Commander-Archive.digest.vol-ac

June 20, 2001 - August 08, 2001



      
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 20, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: enough
Oh,BY the way,Iwas going the Florida-Seminole(BURN)Wussy route,but MYYYYY DE. discouraged me from that route and talked me into entering the great world of ME flying in the GREATEST ME plane in the world! AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 20, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: enough
Justified passion there, Al. Of course, you are right and also double right for pointing it out. Nobody in his right mind should cut a good running motor at low altitude and kill a pilot just to show him how dangerous it is. I didn't mention it in my dissertation and I should have, but it should be said clearly, and this should be cleared with your DE before you strap that plane onto your backside: don't you dare cut an engine on me at low altitude. We will do engine out exercises at altitude! Simulate a runway altitude at say 5000' (there are many airports at that altitude in standard conditions, let alone DA, so it is a perfectly legitimate exercise) and fly at minimum speed well below VMC and then open the taps for take off. Maintain 5000' and rotate as usual. Then cut an engine where ever you like and see if you can climb away at various configurations. With geared motors, it is now no problem to level off (to stop the clock, so to speak), reduce power on both engines until you fly in equilibrium, safely reduce power on the engine you want to cut until beta power, increase power on the live motor at a safe pace and proceed with the climb away. If you are alone doing these exercises, you can maintian altitude by reducing power on the 'dead' motor in stages, alternating it with increase in power on the 'live' motor. This calls for very accurate flying; try to maintain heading throughout the exercise: it is time spent very well. If you are two persons up front, the safety pilot can prepare the 'dead' engine while you increase the power on the 'live' engine. It is a good thing to try and circle and land at 20' up, 50' up, into or out of the dead engine because the real hard stuff is nearly a mile below you. If you want to be a hotshot, that is the time to be one. See if you drop below the 5000' level in your recovery. If you do, you know that it was a cheap crash. You can analyze and try again until you not only get it right, but you are performing the maneuvers AUTOMATICALLY. See also what happens if you cut both engines and determine at which altitude you are able to do a 180 and not fall through 5000'. It is an eye-opener. It will scare the crap out of you if you haven't tried these exercises before and they will open up rusted areas in your training that you don't want to find in other circumstances. In singles these exercises hold true also, especially for those jocks who think they can whip a plane around to land on the airfield after losing the only engine at 100' up. It not only humbles you, it teaches you what not to experiment with when you have no time to ponder on poetry. I wrote about my open rating earlier today and when I do airwork to grind in the procedures for a plane that I have never flown before, I will do 15 to 20 take offs and landings at altitude with varying engine and speed configurations until I am comfortable that I know what is expected of me. I wrote an article for AOPA about my years of bush flying and how to prepare for the accurate flying that is required in that scenario. A lot of that discipline has been stitched into my ME flying. Does anybody use the knee-technique in identifying a dead engine? Aw, I am sure you all know it well. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com> To: Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 8:37 PM Subject: enough > > > Oh,BY the way,Iwas going the Florida-Seminole(BURN)Wussy route,but MYYYYY > DE. discouraged me from that route and talked me into entering the great > world of ME flying in the GREATEST ME plane in the world! AL > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 20, 2001
From: res00rbl <res00rbl(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: enough
Great words, Nico - and no, I don't know the "knee" method - please share, if you would. Thx! Jim Jorgensen ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 20, 2001
From: RnJThompson(at)aol.com <RnJThompson(at)aol.com>
Subject: RE Enough
Hi All, In my earlier comments about hard training I think I might have left the door open and allowed STUPIDITY in.Nico has put it to us all well. I am a practicing coward when it comes to the ground and especially COWBOYS or HOTROD pilots. It goes back to the old story of THE OLD and THE BOLD.Getting to grips with the OH SHIT factor has to be done at altitude. A point that was raized earlier about the lack of landing and takeoff charts for the older commanders. I have a solution compliments of our CASA (FAA) .Years ago the Australian department of Transport decided to reinvent the wheel (which is not uncommon) and decided to issue their own Flight Manuals on each aircraft (a uniquely Australian idea) . I believe that all the calculations are based on origional Manufacturers claims multiplied by factors ranging from 1.15 to1.5. The copies I have for my 680E are in poor shape,so I will go down to the department tomorrow and see if I can get new copies that I can either fax or Email to those that want them. I will also try and get copies for the 560E and any others that may still be on record. Please note that in Australia we work in Knots as opposed to Miles per hour, Meters opposed to Feet for airfield lengths and Kilograms as opposed to Pounds.(Pound being were your dog gets sent after arrest). Anyway all those that want please speak up. Regards, Richard. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 21, 2001
From: Mark Woodley Earthlink <woodlema(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: The value of IFR training
I read this about 5 years ago when I started flying. I learned from it, and had about 10 hours of VERY SOLID instrument training during my private training. Not to go flying in conditions I was not legally qualified to fly in, but to be prepared in case I accidentally got into conditions that were less than favorable for a VFR pilot since I did the vast majoority of my flying in Night cross country conditions. I read this frequently. I also take time and do IFR currency training often. This senario can occur also for those IFR pilots who don't keep current, or lose their perspective. Personally I do not consider under the hood necessarily current. I will do "hard" IFR currency training when there is a nice IFR day, doing the full set of approaches, and missed approaches with an instructor. I have been known to take 3 hours of solid actual IFR with an instructor just for the practice. It is interesting to me personally, that when I have been in actual IFR doing 8 or 9 approaches, and 7 missed approaches, with vectoring, and hold patterns, that the stress builds slowly. I am relucant to use the words comfortable when flying IFR, but I am not uncomfortable while flying IFR I respect the conditions and place myself in a different frame of mind than when flying in severe VFR(yes I did type VFR), however after 3 hours of constant missed approaches, holds, and vectors during actual IFR conditions there is certainly a progression of stress. In fact I find myself sweating like I ran a marathon by the end of my "boot camp" type session. Updated 7/24/99 178 Seconds to Live How long can a licensed VFR pilot who has little or no instrument training expect to live after he flies into bad weather and loses visual contact? In 1991 researchers at the University of Illinois did some tests and came up with some very interesting data. Twenty VFR pilot "guinea pigs" flew into simulated instrument weather, and all went into graveyard spirals or roller coasters. The outcome differed in only one respect - the time required until control was lost. The interval ranged from 480 seconds to 20 seconds. The average time was 178 seconds -- two seconds short of three minutes. Here's the fatal scenario. . . . . . . The sky is overcast and the visibility is poor. That reported five mile visibility looks more like two, and you can't judge the height of the overcast. Your altimeter tells you that you are at 5500 feet but your map tells you that there's local terrain as high as 3200 feet. There might be a tower nearby because you're not sure how far off course you are so you press on. You find yourself unconsciously easing back just a bit on the controls to clear those towers. With no warning, you're in the soup. You peer so hard into the milky white mist that your eyes hurt. You fight the feelings in your stomach that tell you're banked left, then right! You try to swallow, only to find your mouth dry. Now you realize you should have waited for better weather. The appointment was important, but not all that important. Somewhere a voice is saying, "You've had it -- it's all over!" You've only referred to you instruments in the past and have never relied on them. You're sure that this is just a bad spot and you'll break out in a few minutes. The problem is that you don't have a few minutes left. You now have 178 seconds to live. Your aircraft "feels" on even keel but your compass turns slowly. You push a little rudder and add a little pressure on the controls to stop the turn but this feels unnatural and you return the controls to their original position. This feels better but now your compass is turning a little faster and your airspeed is increasing slightly. You scan your instruments for help but what you see looks somewhat unfamiliar. You are confused so you assume the instruments must be too. You are now experiencing full blown Spatial Disorientation. Up feels like down and left feels like right. You feel like you are straight and level again but you're not. The spiral continues. You now have 100 seconds to live. You glance at your altimeter and you are shocked to see it unwinding. You're already down to 3000 feet. Instinctively, you pull back on the controls but the altimeter still unwinds. You don't realize that you are in a graveyard spiral and it only gets worse. Your plane is almost sideways you're just tightening the turn by pulling up but all you can see is that altimeter going lower, lower, lower. The engine is into the red and growling and the airspeed is dangerously high. The sound of the air passing by begins to resemble a scream. You now have 45 seconds to live. Now you're sweating and shaking. There must be something wrong with the controls; pulling back only moves the airspeed indicator further into the red. It's supposed to do the opposite! You can hear the wind tearing at the aircraft. Rivets are popping as the load on the wings and tail far exceeds design specifications. 1800, 1500, 1100 feet...... down you go. You now have 10 seconds to live. Suddenly you see the ground. The trees rush up at you. You can now see the horizon if you turn your head far enough but it's at a weird angle -- you're almost inverted! You open your mouth to scream but. . . . . . Your time is up! Next time: LEVEL THE WINGS, REDUCE THROTTLE TO IDLE AND PULL THE NOSE UP NO HIGHER THAN THE HORIZON! YOUR WINGS PRODUCE ALL THE LIFT BUT THEY CANNOT CARRY YOU OUT OF DANGER IF THEY ARE AT A STEEP ANGLE! GET YOUR EYES OFF OF THE ALTIMITER AND LOOK AT YOUR ATTITUDE INDICATOR. THEN LEVEL THE WINGS! LEVEL THE WINGS! LEVEL THE WINGS! Ron's Commentary: Think about it before you press on into marginal weather without an instrument rating AND recent instrument practice or experience. It is just as important to keep your instrument skills current and honed AFTER you become rated. To a GOOD instrument pilot, the view outside of the airplane is of little or no consequence. We watch our trusty instruments using a good steady scan, never fixating on one or the other, constantly interpreting what each one is telling us and how it relates to all the others. If one does not look right, others will either enforce or negate what it is telling us. We strive to always see the "big picture" our entire instrument panel is giving us and fly the airplane accordingly. Someone once said, "Flying itself is inherently safe, but it is mercilessly unforgiving of error." Could there be a truer statement? This article seems all too vivid now with the recent death of John F. Kennedy Jr. on July 17th 1999. He was an aspiring pilot and IMHO, an all around good guy. But by all reports he never got a standard weather briefing from Flight Service nor did he call for an in-flight weather update. He chose not to file a flight plan nor did he reqeust radar flight following which is an option for VFR pilots. Had no more than 100-150 hours total time, less than 25 hours in his new plane, a complex Piper Saratoga. Although he had recently started his instrument training he flew into nighttime blindness with no instrument experience and the rest is history that none of us will ever forget. Very sad indeed for a family who has known this kind of tragedy all too often and also the Bessette family who lost two daughters, one of them an identical twin. I think it is the remaining twin, Lisa Ann Bessette who will suffer the worst. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 21, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: enough
In a message dated 6/20/01 8:27:37 PM Pacific Daylight Time, allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com writes: << Hey,those high dollar Barons,if not caught in 1.75 sec. is rolled! >> HI ALL....... Well, I wasn't going to reply but when I saw the Baron reference I just had to post one more. I promise this is my last. I want to say that while few minds may have been changed, I think this has been a worth while discussion and I for one have enjoyed the dialog. Also, while we clearly disagree on training technique, I love having you in our group Al. Your love for these great airplanes shows and I enjoy your great humor as well....well, here goes. I dug out my log book and I took my ME training just over 20 years ago in a, you guessed it, Baron, (285hp). I was flying Big, heavy, overloaded, 600HP Thrush Commanders under powerlines for a living then and fancied myself as a pretty good aircraft handler. My ego matched the job description and I really thought I was ready for my ME check ride right after the instructor showed me how to start the engines. My instructor was a "hotrod" kid, Jim Oswald, (who now flies for a Major airline) who would spend the next 5.3 hours trying to kill me in this airplane. Jim was my age but had gone a different rout in flying. He had already accrued a bizillion hours in twins as a freight dog. In your flying career you will have a few events that will become etched in you mind between the pleasant blur of hours in the air. Things like the first time you put on real ice in a non deiced airplane, your first groundloop and for me, hour number two of my ME training. We had just finished lunch/ground school/debrief from my firs flight. After one hour of dual I was now cretin that I was ready for the check ride, easy to fly around on one engine 2000 feet AGL, what's the big deal?? We taxied our, did the run up and I started the TO. Just about the time I eased the yoke back to rotate, Jim Mixture cut the right engine. About 1.75 seconds later he cut the other engine and saved the airplane. It was the wildest thing I had done in a flying machine! He had the airplane and the now silent Baron coasted to an intersection and quietly onto a taxiway to a halt, (Jim had obviously done this a few times before )!! I sat in the airplane with my palms sweating and my head spinning. It was the very first time I could remember being a "passenger" in the "pilot seat" Jim never said a word, he didn't need to, "message transmitted, message received" This airplane is a cold hearted S.O.B. and it will hurt you. I was properly humbled and from then on I had to use a step ladder to drain the sumps on the Baron We spent the next 4 hours really flying that airplane including a landing with the left engine caged. If you have never actually landed with one dead, you might get another surprise at just how mush adverse yaw the windilling engine will create, but I suppose you can just be told about that. You see, I am from the old school and still think instructors should instruct. Isn't that why we hire an expert to teach us? To show us what to do (and what not to do)?? To show us what might happen if we become complacent. To allow us to experience the "real deal." I can read all about adverse yaw and VMC speeds with out paying an instructor, I want to Learn how to deal with these possibilities. If you don't learn this now, with a qualified instructor by your side, what chance do you think you have learning it on that 90 degree day on that 2300 foot strip. Or do you just assume that the engine will never quit near the ground, or suddenly, of at rotation?? And if it does, you will just "figure it out"?? I am a firm believer in simulators and the training they afford, but like someone else posted, if there is no simulator, are we to then just accept mediocre training and book learning or park the airplane and buy one that is supported by a sim?? Did Jim's engine cut demonstration teach my a new flying technique?? Nope. Did it make me a better pilot?? Absolutely!! I remember that event vividly and on EVERY T.O. I plan for that event. It made me consider every T.O. as a potential emergency and I REALLY know what happens when one "swarms" at rotation, not what the book says, not what my instructor told me happens, what really happens, do you? In the 2300 foot, 90 degree illustration it would ad a level of understanding that might cause the "hard trained" guy to decide not to go just then, or at least to use extra caution. I would not have missed my staggering around on one engine, close to the ground "hard training" for anything. I also wouldnt subject a geared engine to this, as someone said, "trash someone else's airplane". Thanks for letting me vent. I really am done now and wont say one more word on this subject. Thanks again Al an all of you for the great dialog we can have. We can agree to disagree on some things but one thing is for sure, we all love the Greatest Twin ever made!! VIVA LA COMMANDER!! jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 21, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: NICE FLIGHT, IGUANAS???
In a message dated 6/19/01 11:07:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time, CloudCraft writes: << << Stayed low, (5500 ft) cause I had an Iguana (yep, I said Iguana) riding on this trip and worry about there ears >> OK. You owe us an explanation. >> OK, OK.......... Yep, Al had it right. I might be a red neck Commander pilot. I do occasionally fly with an Iguana as my copilot. They actually make a pretty good one. They never talk back (Never) They don't whine about the food or the hours and they are not "stick hogs" (or any other hog for that matter, they are iguanas) Sue and I have a couple of old iguanas (10 years) Our male, TC, (no, believe it or not it doesn't stand for Twin Commander) is about 5.5 feet long and weighs 12 pounds. We also have a female, Puff usually smaller than TC but she is currently with eggs. (anybody want a baby iguana or three????) TC commutes with Rocky (Our Schnauzer) and I in the Commander each week from SEA and seems to do OK but I worry about his ears, although it never seems to bother him?? Anyway, I stay a little lower. He just sits on the rear bench and looks out the window. Kinda reminds you or Noah's ark?? jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 21, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: RE Enough
Richard, I'd love a copy of 680E stuff!!! Barry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 21, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: NICE FLIGHT, IGUANAS???
Anyway, I stay a little lower. He just sits on the > rear bench and looks out the window. > Kinda reminds you or Noah's ark?? jb Oh how I wish I could make the fly-in....you guys are *unreal*!!!!! I though I had heard it all when a friend of mine told me abou the time he forgot he had his dog (bassett hound) in the back seat of his CJ-6A (tandem, 9 cyl. radial, Chinese AF trainer) and pulled 4 G's in the overhead break!!! Dog doesn't fly anymore..... Barry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 21, 2001
From: Bruce A. Campbell <baruch(at)IntelligentFlight.com>
Subject: 520 Perf data
While were at it, the 520 manual is a masterpiece of brevity (13 typewritten pages), lacking any hint of performance info, take-off distances, climb rates, power settings, etc. The 560 manual has some of this stuff. Does anyone have a feeling for whether it would be representative of a 520's perf, or do I need to do the test pilot thing and produce test data myself as a first order of business? If not the 560, is the 500S or 680 similar in performance? (I know that the engines on the 500S are direct drive, so I would expect differences there, but the power is similar to the GO 435, then again the props are different too...) BTW, nothing quite as satisfying as a lively debate on something important, eh? Bruce A. Campbell N4186B ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 21, 2001
From: AOPA ePilot Newsletter <aopa_news(at)aopa.org>
Subject: AOPA ePilot -- Vol. 3, Issue 25
AOPA ePilot--Vol. 3, Issue 25 Departments Inside AOPA On Capitol Hill Airport Support Network ASF News Quiz Me! 2001 Bonanza Sweepstakes ePilot Calendar Weekend Weather GlaStar kit production to resume under new flag Paris Air Show: Dassault announces FNX jet Women racers ready for adventure FAA report supports AOPA on runway safety Volume 3, Issue 25 June 22, 2001 GA News MOONEY CLEARS THE AIR ON ITS FINANCIAL STATUS In a statement to ePilot this week, Mike McConnell, Mooney Aircraft's senior vice president of strategic planning, adamantly denied rumors that his company is on the verge of filing for bankruptcy protection. Over the past few weeks some had portrayed the Kerrville, Texas, company as being both broke and bloated with excess inventory. "Just to be crystal clear: We are not planning to halt production or working to avert Chapter 11 [bankruptcy] proceedings. We absolutely have not held those discussions internally." Mooney officials said they have been organizing the company to be profitable over the next year to "hedge against softer market conditions" and have decided to reduce outputby 40 percent compared to the past two yearsto improve its sales and service support networks. Mooney plans to produce about 70 airplanes this year, down from 100 units last year. "As a result of this effort, residual aircraft values should remain GLASTAR KIT PRODUCTION TO RESUME UNDER NEW FLAG Thomas W. Wathen, who ended months of legal wrangling in bankruptcy court when he bought the assets to the Glasair kitplane line, is once again in the buying mode with his latest: the GlaStar assets. "After the purchase of the Glasair assets, it quickly became evident to us that the overhead necessary to operate the business would be better spread over more than one product line," said Mikael Via, chief operating officer of New GlaStar LLC and New Glasair LLC. Wathen said his companies have placed top priority on shipping parts to grounded builders. He bought the assets from Arlington Aircraft Development Inc., which once had a licensing agreement with the now-bankrupt Stoddard-Hamilton Aircraft Inc. More than 800 of the high-wing GlaStar aircraft have been sold since 1995. See the PARIS AIR SHOW: DASSAULT ANNOUNCES FNX JET Dassault Aviation announced at the Paris Air Show last week that it was launching a new business "tri-jet" called the FNX, capable of flying as far as 5,700 nautical miles and at cruise speeds in the range of 0.85 Mach. This fills the niche between Dassault Falcon Jet's Falcon 2000 and the 6,500-nm global business jets (the Bombardier Global Express and Gulfstream's G-V and G-VSP). Engines have yet to be selected. The FNX will have fly-by-wire controls. First flight of the FNX is set for 2004. For more Paris Air Show coverage, see AOPA Online. WOMEN RACERS READY FOR ADVENTURE The twenty-fifth annual Air Race Classic, an all-women coast-to-coast air race, starts in San Diego next Tuesday. You can follow along with our own Elizabeth A. Tennyson, managing editor of AOPA Flight Training magazine, as she posts daily dispatches about the race on AOPA Online. She will be flying a Cessna 182RG along with pilot Gretchen Jahn. The race is scheduled to end in Batavia, Ohio, on June 29. See AOPA Online. WORLD AIR GAMES GET UNDER WAY The opening ceremony for the World Air Games 2001 commences tomorrow in southern Spain. More than 5,000 air athletes and officials from 80 countries will compete in the Olympic-style event in sports ranging from formation skydiving to glider aerobatics. This is the second year the event has taken place. The closing ceremony will be on July 1. To follow the competition, see the Web site. NTSB GIVES NOTICE OF FINAL GA CRASH REPORTS The NTSB has added a new feature to its Web site to let the public know when final general aviation accident reports are nearing completion. The pending reports will be listed by accident number, date, location, and aircraft registration number. See the Web site. CLARIFICATION: Contrary to what was reported last week in ePilot, Jerry Michael Warren was alone when the Cessna 150 he was flying became entangled in high-voltage wires. For daily news updates, see AOPA Online. Inside AOPA FAA REPORT SUPPORTS AOPA ON RUNWAY SAFETY The FAA released Wednesday a report that proves what AOPA has been saying for some time, "that the majority of runway incursions are minor, particularly those involving general aviation aircraft." The study, which looked at the years 1997 through 2000, also showed that the number of runway incursions among aircraft operations is proportional to the activity levelsGA represents 60 percent of the incursions and nearly 60 percent of all aircraft operations. For the first time the FAA report categorized the severity of runway incursions, something that AOPA has been calling for in order to develop appropriate responses to the problem. Next week AOPA President Phil Boyer will testify before Congress, saying that "education, rather than expensive technology is the best means to prevent runway incursions for GA." AOPA AOPA OBJECTS TO FAA HIGH-ALTITUDE PLAN AOPA has objected to an FAA plan to accelerate domestic reduced vertical separation minima (DRVSM). The plan could cost owners of turbine aircraft as much as $300,000 in testing and modification if they want to continue flying above Flight Level 290 over the United States. In order to increase system capacity, the FAA wants to reduce vertical separation between aircraft from 2,000 feet to 1,000 feet above 29,000 feet. (2,000 feet is used today at high altitudes because of the inaccuracy of conventional altimeter systems.) While the FAA wants to change the standards by 2004, AOPA wants the agency to stick to a phased introduction plan that would start DRVSM above FL350 in 2004, then add the lower altitudes at a later date. See AOPA Online. AOPA, SPORTY'S TEAM UP ON LEARN TO FLY CAMPAIGN AOPA and Sporty's Pilot Shop are again sending some 2,000 free "Learn to Fly Here!" highway directional signs to flight schools nationwide to mark the way to local flight training. "When we sent this same sign a few years ago, it was such a success at boosting flight training that we decided to send it again," said Sporty's Chairman Hal Shevers, who also operates a flight school at Sporty's home base airport in Batavia, Ohio, and is this year's Be A Pilot program chairman. "We know from our own experience that these signs really can help boost a school's business." The reflective, white-on-green metal signs are traffic sign quality for durable mounting on standard signposts. The design also features the silhouette of a general aviation aircraft to help define the concept of flight training. The signs were sent to all flight schools registered with the Be A Pilot program. For more, see here to update. On Capitol Hill HOUSE FUNDING BILL INCLUDES AOPA INPUT The House Appropriations Committee approved Wednesday the annual funding bill for the Department of Transportation for the 2002 fiscal year that begins on October 1. The bill that recommends $13.3 billion for the FAA includes input by AOPA, such as a provision to retain the language prohibiting the funding of work on unauthorized user fees. Programs key to general aviation that are currently set to receive funding include: OASIS ($33.9 million), the program designed to modernize flight service stations; Safe Flight 21 ($35 million), a program that will evaluate several GPS-based solutions to help reduce controlled flight into terrain accidents, runway incursions, and midair collisions; Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS, $76 million) and the Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS, $42.45 million), which enhance the accuracy of current GPS signals; and notams ($ Airport Support Network ASN WORKS TO SAVE NATION'S AIRPORTS What would you do if your airport closed tomorrow? Every day 925 AOPA Airport Support Network volunteers work with AOPA headquarters on a local level to help save their airports. That's a lot, but not enough. Ask yourself these questions: Has my flying been affected by development, new restrictions, or negative public relations about my local airport? Have local issues or political pressures affected my use and the efficiency of my local airport? If the answer is "yes" to either question, you may be just the kind of person we're looking for to help ensure the health and availability of your airport. ASN is looking for volunteers at several airports in California, including O32, O88, SDM, IZA, MIT, TVL, SVE, and O15. To learn more about the Airport Support Network, visit AOPA Online. AOPA Air Safety Foundation News ASF, JEPP LAUNCH ONLINE CFI REFRESHER COURSE A fast-paced, highly interactive certificated flight instructor refresher course that allows a CFI to renew his or her FAA teaching certificate without leaving home is now available online. The innovative 16-hour course, a cooperative effort of the AOPA Air Safety Foundation and Jeppesen Sanderson Inc., is FAA-approved and may be used to renew all valid and current FAA flight instructor certificates and ratings. (Flight instructor certificates, unlike other pilot certificates, expire every two years.) In addition, the new $149 course allows chief instructors for FAA-approved flight schools to renew their designations yearly. See AOPA Online. Quiz Me! Heres a question asked by an AOPA member last week of our AOPA technical specialists. Test your knowledge. Question: As an airline pilot, I am current to carry 200 passengers across the North Atlantic. Can I take a member of my family for a ride on Sunday afternoon in our 172? Answer: Not necessarily. FAR 61.57(a) and (b) require three takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days in the same category, class, and type (if a type rating is required) to act as pilot in command carrying passengers. Category and class require the pilot to complete three takeoffs and landing in both single-engine airplanes and multiengine airplanes if the pilot is rated in both and is exercising the privileges of carrying passengers in both. For more, see AOPA Online. Got a technical question for AOPA specialists? Call 800/872-2672 or e-mail to inforequest(at)aopa.org. Send comments on our Quiz Me! questions to epilot(at)aopa.org. AOPA Sweepstakes Bonanza Update Read about how Beryl D'Shannon's products will make the 2001 AOPA Sweepstakes Bonanza safer, especially during the takeoff and landing phases of flight. See the latest project update on AOPA Online. On The Road To Expo The Sweepstakes Bonanza will be the centerpiece of the static display at AOPA Expo 2001, which takes place November 8 through 10 in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Don't miss this opportunity to see your dream airplane. See AOPA Online. What's New At AOPA Online The AOPA Air Safety Foundation's new Safety Advisor publication, Fuel Awareness, is now available. Click here to download. Printed copies are also available by calling 800/USA-AOPA. There's also a fuel awareness quiz. See AOPA Online. ePilot Calendar WEEKEND FLYING DESTINATIONS Rockton, Ontario. 2001 Canadian National Soaring Championships take place June 27 through July 6. Call 905/793-9849 for event information, or visit the Web site ( http://www.sac.ca/nationals ). Niagara Falls, New York. The Niagara Falls Air Force Base presents an airshow June 30 and July 1. Call 716/236-2136 for event information. Scott Air Force Base, Illinois. Scott AFB presents an air show June 30 and July 1. Call 618/628-8838 for event information. FLYING DESTINATIONS IN YOUR AREA QUINCY, CALIFORNIA. Annual Wings and Wheels Fly-In takes place June 30 at Gansner Field (2O1). Call 530/283-2500 for event information. For more airport details, see AOPA's Airport Directory Online. For more events, see Aviation Calendar of Events ASF SAFETY SEMINARS The next AOPA ASF Safety Seminars are scheduled in Queens, New York, June 25; Long Island, New York, June 26; Poughkeepsie, New York, June 27; and North Branch, New Jersey, June 28. See AOPA Online for more information. ASF FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR REFRESHER CLINICS (All clinics start at 7:30 a.m.) The next AOPA Air Safety Foundation Flight Instructor Refresher Clinics are scheduled in Columbus, Ohio, and Reston, Virginia, June 23 and 24. Clinics are scheduled in San Mateo, California; Portland, Maine; and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, July 14 and 15. For the Flight Instructor Refresher Clinic schedule, see AOPA Online. ASF PINCH-HITTER GROUND-SCHOOL COURSES (Pinch-Hitter courses start at 9:30 a.m.) The next Pinch-Hitter Ground School will take place June 24 in Columbus, Ohio. For more Pinch-Hitter courses, see AOPA Online. For comments on calendar items or to make submissions, contact Julie S. Walker at julie.walker(at)aopa.org. Contacting ePilot Got news tips? Contact ePilot editor Nathan A. Ferguson at nate.ferguson(at)aopa.org. Having difficulty using this service? Visit the ePilot Frequently Asked Questions now at AOPA Online or write to epilot(at)aopa.org. You are currently subscribed as NAME-NICO VAN NIEKERK eMail Address-NICO(at)CYBERSUPERSTORE.COM. Changing your mailing or e-mail addresses? Click here to update. To UNSUBSCRIBE: Click here Unsubscribe, then hit the "Send" button. Do not include a message. To SUBSCRIBE: visit http://www.aopa.org/members/epilot.html. AOPA, 421 Aviation Way, Frederick, MD 21701 Tel: 800/USA-AOPA or 301/695-2000 Copyright 2001. Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association. Advertisers ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 22, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Commander list update
Morning all. I just received official word that Microsoft is going to eliminate the listbot service. Listbot will be shut down August 20th. Our Commander forum seems to be very popular and many of you have expressed appreciation for it's existance. I will attempt to either find a suitable replacement service or will set up my own list server over the next 60 days. I'll do my best to ensure an easy transition for all the list members. More info as I figure out what to do... Chris Schuermann ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 22, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: 520 Perf data
In a message dated 6/21/01 11:36:39 PM Pacific Daylight Time, baruch(at)IntelligentFlight.com writes: << While were at it, the 520 manual is a masterpiece of brevity (13 typewritten pages), lacking any hint of performance info, take-off distances, climb rates, power settings, etc. >> HI BRUCE......... I talked to Richard Thompson from Oz yesterday and he told me that the Aussies rewrite all the flight manuals on airplanes shipped there. He said in most cases they are more accurate (less optimistic) than the US version. If any 520s made it over there, Their FAA may have a good manual available?? Richard is on this list so he may reply jb PS Richard and his lovely bride will be attending the flyin. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 22, 2001
From: Mark Woodley Earthlink <woodlema(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: 520 Perf data
My POH, is a brilliant piece of sales literature. Remember back then I don;t believe that there was anything even romotely called POH. I will see what I can drag up, I have all the documents on my AC560 with GO 480's, but if I remember all my performance stuff, "PoH" and relating documents are in my plane. Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Odum" <calnet01(at)gte.net> To: "Bruce A. Campbell" Cc: Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 11:45 AM Subject: Re: 520 Perf data > > > Bruce and all. > > There are some great articles on AVWEB and in the EAA magazine on the > methodology required to gather performance data on any aircraft. These > procedures are quite intensive and require good math skills while flying. > Most people use digital movie cameras and record instrument readings and > coclpit lever settings. This way you can do the math at home. > > I will see if I can get electronic copies of the EAA stuff from Earl > Lawrence and get them out to you. > > If we all make a concerted effort TOGETHER we could break out requirements > into sections and everyone could take a crack at a certain part. This way we > can assemble our own performance data based on the current condition of our > aircraft NOT USING PERFECT TEST PILOT TECHNIQUES and assemble real world > data. > > Give me some feedback gentlemen and ladies. This is what the TCFG is all > about. > > Being an ex-test pilot I know this is asking alot. It will take a concerted > effort on everyones parts. OH - by the way - we all fly different aircraft > so each group of model owners will need to assemble a team to develop > numbers for each aircraft ! > > Paul Odum > > > "Bruce A. Campbell" wrote: > > > > > > > While were at it, the 520 manual is a masterpiece of brevity (13 > > typewritten pages), lacking any hint of performance info, take-off > > distances, climb rates, power settings, etc. > > > > The 560 manual has some of this stuff. Does anyone have a feeling for > > whether it would be representative of a 520's perf, or do I need to do > > the test pilot thing and produce test data myself as a first order of > > business? > > > > If not the 560, is the 500S or 680 similar in performance? (I know that > > the engines on the 500S are direct drive, so I would expect differences > > there, but the power is similar to the GO 435, then again the props are > > different too...) > > > > BTW, nothing quite as satisfying as a lively debate on something > > important, eh? > > > > Bruce A. Campbell > > N4186B > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 22, 2001
From: Reynolds, Rich <Rich.Reynolds(at)UNIFORM.ARAMARK.com>
Subject: Re: Actual article - May 1955
Very well put...... Rich Reynolds I.T. Development Staff - ext. 3633 rich.reynolds(at)uniform.aramark.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Nico van Niekerk [SMTP:nico(at)cybersuperstore.com] > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 1:11 PM > To: jagdip(at)iwon.com; Markota, Dorothy > Cc: Cook, Betsy; Lew, Sandra; Andrea Bent; Betty Tlanda; Carolyn & Bill; > Cheryl Cook; Danni Meyer; David Larkin; Gross, Meredith; Jane & Boo; Kathy > & Scott; Kopy, Martha; Lois Driscoll; Margo Sundy; Paula Gomez; Potter, > Tammy; Robert Nolen; Robyn Tarrant; Ron Stein; Sayegh, Pat; Siebler, > Barbara; Bill & Diane Cook; Bob Cook, Jr.; Terry Cook; Uncle Bob & Aunt > Peg; Arnold, Harry; Cappuccilli, Mark; Doran, Kathy; Nicassio, Philip; > Park, Greg; Porter, Carrie; Reynolds, Rich; Smith, Warren; Tepper, > Belinda; Schmidt, Patricia; Carol Burks; Larry Gaines; Nancy - home; Baba, > Mary > Subject: Re: Actual article - May 1955 > > No, it does not mean "all wives should..." I never said ALL wives. There > are > wives who couldn't care a hoot about other people. There are wives who > will > take care of their working husbands but not in the sense of the 1955 > article. And there will always be wives who will take care of their > working > (or not working) husbands regardless of circumstance or consequence. > If it were in my demeanor to take up a job as homemaker, I would take damn > good care of the one who brings in the cash, that I assure you. But it may > sound a bit materialistic, so if I know that my wife, if she is the bread > winner, gets in contact with attractive men all day and she has to come > home > at night to deal with me and the kids, I assure you I would follow a lot > of > the advise in that article. I would make damn sure she gets so much sex > and > love that she would not want to look at those hunks out there. I would > make > sure that I remain her hunk and not p... her off unnecessarily, especially > not just because I feel neglected. She would be pampered and pleased > because of her I have my job. But alas, now I am the bread winner. > I would not want a wife that is submissive at all times. Kinda takes the > fun > out of the relationship. I am undisputedly the head of the household but > it > does not mean that my wife is a subject of mine, which is where I disagree > with the 1955 approach. It is not good practice to consider your opinion > less important as someone else's. She is a partner and fulfills an office > that I cannot or would not want to fulfill. That's why it works. > Nico > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jagdip at iwon.com <jagdip(at)iwon.com> > To: Markota, Dorothy ; 'Nico van > Niekerk' > Cc: Cook, Betsy ; Lew, Sandra > ; Andrea Bent > ; > Betty Tlanda ; Carolyn & Bill ; > Cheryl Cook ; Danni Meyer ; David > Larkin > ; Gross, Meredith > ; Jane & Boo ; Kathy > & > Scott ; Kopy, Martha ; > Lois Driscoll ; Margo Sundy ; > Paula Gomez ; Potter, Tammy > ; Robert Nolen ; > Robyn > Tarrant ; Ron Stein > ; > Sayegh, Pat ; Siebler, Barbara > ; Bill &am > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 12:40 PM > Subject: RE: Actual article - May 1955 > > > This means - what you are saying is > > "all wifes should take care of working husbands - if they are house wives > - like the good old days !!!!" > > I am sure if men stayed home, they may be taking - good care of their " > working women ". > > -- Original Message -- > > > > > Like Betsy said, "Dream on, guys!". > > > > The men should be taking care of us working women so well, huh? > > > >Dorothy Markota > >Aramark Uniform Services > >EDI and Reporting Project Manager > >(818) 973-3665 Fax: (818) 973-3796 > >dorothy.markota(at)uniform.aramark.com > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Nico van Niekerk [mailto:nico(at)cybersuperstore.com] > >Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 11:05 AM > >To: Cook, Betsy; Andrea Bent; Betty Tlanda; Carolyn & Bill; Cheryl Cook; > >Danni Meyer; David Larkin; Gross, Meredith; Jane & Boo; Jay Mehta; Kathy > >& Scott; Kopy, Martha; Lois Driscoll; Margo Sundy; Paula Gomez; Potter, > >Tammy; Robert Nolen; Robyn Tarrant; Ron Stein; Sayegh, Pat; Siebler, > >Barbara; Bill & Diane Cook; Bob Cook, Jr.; Terry Cook; Uncle Bob & Aunt > >Peg; Arnold, Harry; Cappuccilli, 14; Doran, Kathy; Nicassio, Philip; > >Park, Greg; Porter, Carrie; Reynolds, Rich; Smith, Warren; Tepper, > >Belinda; Schmidt, Patricia; Carol Burks; Larry Gaines; Nancy - home; > >Baba, Mary; Lew, Sandra; Markota, Dorothy > >Subject: Re: Actual article - May 1955 > > > > > >Aaah, the good old times. Pity it went by before I could enjoy it. > >Nico > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: Cook, Betsy <betsy.cook(at)uniform.aramark.com> > >To: Andrea Bent ; Betty Tlanda > >; Carolyn & Bill ; Cheryl Cook > >; Danni Meyer ; David Larkin > >; Gross, Meredith > >; Jane & Boo ; Jay > >Mehta ; Kathy & Scott ; Kopy, Martha > >; Lois Driscoll ; > Margo > >Sundy ; Paula Gomez ; > >Potter, Tammy ; Robert Nolen > >; Robyn Tarrant ; Ron > Stein > >; Sayegh, Pat ; > >Siebler, Barbara ; Bill & Diane Cook > >; Bob Cook, Jr. >Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 10:02 AM > >Subject: FW: Actual article - May 1955 > > > > > >> Dream on, guys! > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Introducing iWon Cash Points...now everyone's a winner on iWon.com. > Visit http://www.iwon.com now and start earning iWon Cash Points today! > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 22, 2001
From: Jim Crunkleton <crunk12(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: New Address
Hi Guys, I finally got back on line after firing my ISP. Gee, I had to go over an entire week without one RNCP joke. One other thing, does anyone know the preferred method of attaching the black mudflap with the shiny silhouette nude to a 520 Commander gear? Crunk ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 22, 2001
From: Jim Crunkleton <crunk12(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Address
Rodd, hmmm.......not a bad idea! Crunk ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 22, 2001
From: Richard Brown <pawpaw1(at)starband.net>
Subject: Re: 520 Perf data
GREAT idea Paul! That will get everyone real numbers Rich ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Odum" <calnet01(at)gte.net> To: "Bruce A. Campbell" Cc: Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 10:45 AM Subject: Re: 520 Perf data > > > Bruce and all. > > There are some great articles on AVWEB and in the EAA magazine on the > methodology required to gather performance data on any aircraft. These > procedures are quite intensive and require good math skills while flying. > Most people use digital movie cameras and record instrument readings and > coclpit lever settings. This way you can do the math at home. > > I will see if I can get electronic copies of the EAA stuff from Earl > Lawrence and get them out to you. > > If we all make a concerted effort TOGETHER we could break out requirements > into sections and everyone could take a crack at a certain part. This way we > can assemble our own performance data based on the current condition of our > aircraft NOT USING PERFECT TEST PILOT TECHNIQUES and assemble real world > data. > > Give me some feedback gentlemen and ladies. This is what the TCFG is all > about. > > Being an ex-test pilot I know this is asking alot. It will take a concerted > effort on everyones parts. OH - by the way - we all fly different aircraft > so each group of model owners will need to assemble a team to develop > numbers for each aircraft ! > > Paul Odum > > > "Bruce A. Campbell" wrote: > > > > > > > While were at it, the 520 manual is a masterpiece of brevity (13 > > typewritten pages), lacking any hint of performance info, take-off > > distances, climb rates, power settings, etc. > > > > The 560 manual has some of this stuff. Does anyone have a feeling for > > whether it would be representative of a 520's perf, or do I need to do > > the test pilot thing and produce test data myself as a first order of > > business? > > > > If not the 560, is the 500S or 680 similar in performance? (I know that > > the engines on the 500S are direct drive, so I would expect differences > > there, but the power is similar to the GO 435, then again the props are > > different too...) > > > > BTW, nothing quite as satisfying as a lively debate on something > > important, eh? > > > > Bruce A. Campbell > > N4186B > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Commander web site and chatlist update
Commander friends (and RNCP's too), I have been studying the options to migrate the chatlist off of listbot (since they are closing). I've been unimpressed wtih the options so far. Most of the other facilities (including the higher-priced services) are cumbersom to use and (in my opinion) leave much to be desired from a privacy standpoint. Don't know about y'all, but I just hate having to provide a bunch of personal information to get signed up for a service. I get plenty of spam, junk mail, and telemarketers as is without giving my life history away to microsoft etal. Question for you: anyone have any comments about the current web site connectivity? Do you have any problems accessing the web site? I am currently running aerocommander.com on a mid-range pentium server with a 100baseT connection to a Cisco router connected to the internet with a full dedicated T1. I've not heard any complaints, so have not upgraded the connection in a long time. (I'm currently paying $1400/month for the T1 already). I am considering adding a secure email server to the same box just for the Commander chatlist. At least this way, I can assure absolute security and privacy for my fellow Commander nuts. The only real disadvantage I can see is that the signup/remove operation would be a manual operation for me at this time. People would have to send me a subscribe request email and then I'd add them by hand. We have a significant base of long-term subscribers, but we also get about a dozen subscribe/unsubscribes a week - probably just from folks wondering what we are... Anyway, I'm continuing to search for options. I'm not in favor of a BBS style interface. I've watched that type of forum fail entirely for other type groups as it eliminates the "interactivness" of the group. Will keep everyone informed as I figure out what to do about the list, but I DO intend to keep things going as long as YOU continue to appreciate and enjoy the chatlist. Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: Commander web site and chatlist update
Not only do I appreciate the list, but the chattering of the members is a great source of hangar talk. So, if you can keep it going, it would be great. Before you decide to shut it down, yell for help; there may be a lot of resources in the group that can keep the list going. Look at the chat section of AOPA. It is not friendly because of its size and when one posts a message or two in different sections, it is hard to find it again to respond to replies. I mean I have around 2,000 unread messages which are not addressed to me! That's useless and I don't go there anymore. Maybe I should tell them. The access times have never been a problem. The T1 you have should be more than ample to handle the calls. (You can get a T1 for around a grand now if you shop around.) Thanks Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com> To: Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 2:47 PM Subject: Commander web site and chatlist update > > > Commander friends (and RNCP's too), > I have been studying the options to migrate the chatlist off of listbot > (since they are closing). I've been unimpressed wtih the options so > far. > Most of the other facilities (including the higher-priced services) are > cumbersom to use and (in my opinion) leave much to be desired from a > privacy > standpoint. Don't know about y'all, but I just hate having to provide a > bunch of personal information to get signed up for a service. I get > plenty > of spam, junk mail, and telemarketers as is without giving my life > history > away to microsoft etal. > Question for you: anyone have any comments about the current web site > connectivity? Do you have any problems accessing the web site? > I am currently running aerocommander.com on a mid-range pentium server > with > a 100baseT connection to a Cisco router connected to the internet with a > full dedicated T1. I've not heard any complaints, so have not upgraded > the > connection in a long time. (I'm currently paying $1400/month for the T1 > already). I am considering adding a secure email server to the same box > just for the Commander chatlist. At least this way, I can assure > absolute > security and privacy for my fellow Commander nuts. The only real > disadvantage > I can see is that the signup/remove operation would be a manual > operation > for me at this time. People would have to send me a subscribe request > email > and then I'd add them by hand. We have a significant base of long-term > subscribers, but we also get about a dozen subscribe/unsubscribes a week > - > probably just from folks wondering what we are... > > Anyway, I'm continuing to search for options. I'm not in favor of a BBS > style interface. I've watched that type of forum fail entirely for > other > type groups as it eliminates the "interactivness" of the group. > Will keep everyone informed as I figure out what to do about the list, > but > I DO intend to keep things going as long as YOU continue to appreciate > and enjoy the chatlist. > > Chris > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Commander web site and chatlist update
In a message dated 06/23/01 14:48:28 Pacific Daylight Time, chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com writes: > I DO intend to keep things going as long as YOU continue to appreciate > and enjoy the chatlist. Chris, As I've said before, you're a saint. (That would be St. Christopher, now the patron saint of Aero Commanders. It's a promotion.) Having been with the Twin Commander Flight Group since its beginning, I get to say that the email reflector is absolutely one of the best things to ever happen for the Group ... right up there with Capt. Jimbob. I hope it can continue. Would a small dontation from each of us help? I don't own a Twin Commander, but I'd toss a few drakmars towards keeping this list alive. I believe it's that valuable! What about the rest of us? Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: Commander web site and chatlist update
Up to this time I have been participating in the email exchanges for free. Is there a subscription fee that I have been missing? Because if there is, I would like to pay my dues. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com To: chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Cc: tcfg(at)listbot.com Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 4:15 PM Subject: Re: Commander web site and chatlist update 1. Fill in the brief application 2. Receive approval decision within 30 seconds In a message dated 06/23/01 14:48:28 Pacific Daylight Time, chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com writes: I DO intend to keep things going as long as YOU continue to appreciate and enjoy the chatlist. Chris, As I've said before, you're a saint. (That would be St. Christopher, now the patron saint of Aero Commanders. It's a promotion.) Having been with the Twin Commander Flight Group since its beginning, I get to say that the email reflector is absolutely one of the best things to ever happen for the Group ... right up there with Capt. Jimbob. I hope it can continue. Would a small dontation from each of us help? I don't own a Twin Commander, but I'd toss a few drakmars towards keeping this list alive. I believe it's that valuable! What about the rest of us? Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2001
From: Bruce A. Campbell <baruch(at)IntelligentFlight.com>
Subject: Re: Commander web site and chatlist update
The list is very appreciated. I have a sparcstation 5 serving IntelligentFlight.com and would be happy to give you superuser access and anything else necessary if you wish, but it probably isn't as fast as your pentium. At any event, it seems to me performace isn't an issue for a mail list. I second the nomination for canonisation. The best part would be the medals are already in the gift shop! Bruce A. Campbell N4186B Chris Schuermann wrote: > > > Commander friends (and RNCP's too), > I have been studying the options to migrate the chatlist off of listbot > (since they are closing). I've been unimpressed wtih the options so > far. > Most of the other facilities (including the higher-priced services) are > cumbersom to use and (in my opinion) leave much to be desired from a > privacy > standpoint. Don't know about y'all, but I just hate having to provide a > bunch of personal information to get signed up for a service. I get > plenty > of spam, junk mail, and telemarketers as is without giving my life > history > away to microsoft etal. > Question for you: anyone have any comments about the current web site > connectivity? Do you have any problems accessing the web site? > I am currently running aerocommander.com on a mid-range pentium server > with > a 100baseT connection to a Cisco router connected to the internet with a > full dedicated T1. I've not heard any complaints, so have not upgraded > the > connection in a long time. (I'm currently paying $1400/month for the T1 > already). I am considering adding a secure email server to the same box > just for the Commander chatlist. At least this way, I can assure > absolute > security and privacy for my fellow Commander nuts. The only real > disadvantage > I can see is that the signup/remove operation would be a manual > operation > for me at this time. People would have to send me a subscribe request > email > and then I'd add them by hand. We have a significant base of long-term > subscribers, but we also get about a dozen subscribe/unsubscribes a week > - > probably just from folks wondering what we are... > > Anyway, I'm continuing to search for options. I'm not in favor of a BBS > style interface. I've watched that type of forum fail entirely for > other > type groups as it eliminates the "interactivness" of the group. > Will keep everyone informed as I figure out what to do about the list, > but > I DO intend to keep things going as long as YOU continue to appreciate > and enjoy the chatlist. > > Chris > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2001
From: Mark Woodley <woodlema(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Commander web site and chatlist update
Solution. 99% of all ISP's provide space on the server. Use a basic web interface and HTML code along with some CGI scripts which can be gotten anyplace for free, to set up a basic sign in sheet. Also, Microsoft Outlook, Outlook express, and Exchange provide ADDRESS BOOKS. You can create your own distribution list. Not a hard thing to do. It is not like this group has millions of folks to keep track of and the list does not change much, and only gets added to. If someones e-mail address changes make them responsible to update the CGI, or sign in sheet. Forgive my blatent voice in this but SCREW the folks like Microsoft and list services, all they do is take your e-mail addresses, and send to to places who spam you with unwanted e-mail. I would have everyone reply directly to one or 2 adress, and add them to a seperate address book. This can be all kept simply and easily. There are so many possibilities, it would take me hours to elaborate on them all. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 24, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: WOW!
Hey guys (do we have any 'gals' here???). I'm humbled by the emails I've received since the update yesterday. Thanks for all the kind and supportive words! I truely appreciate all the offers to assist in so many different ways. Your feedback has given me the incentive to get my butt in gear and make sure this forum continues to be freely available to all Commander enthusiasts. At this time, I'm not happy with any of the alternative services that I've reviewed, so will probably go ahead and create my own listbot-like service. After reading all the email waiting for me this morning, it also occured to me that I need to make sure the list and web site will be able to continue should something ever happen to me. Once I get the new list-server online, I'm going to burn a CDROM of the web site and mail server system and send it to Capt Jimbob. Everything is currently backed up nightly on 4mm DAT tape and stored in a bank vault, but I've not arranged for someone else to take it over should the need arise. Thanks again to everyone! Chris Schuermann ps: Keith - might want to hold up on that sainthood until I actually get something to work :-) Since I live in Oklahoma is that going to make me a "redneck patron saint" ? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 24, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <tylorh(at)sound.net>
Subject: Re: WOW!
"RPS" Chris, Look at http://mucows.tucows.com/win2k/mailserver2k.html There is a lot of mail server software out there. What do you think of Yahoo Groups, Topica.com as free services? Like a lot of others on this list, I get a lot out of this chat. There is a lot of good information exchanged. Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 -----Original Message----- From: chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com [mailto:chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com] Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 8:44 AM To: tcfg(at)listbot.com Subject: WOW! Hey guys (do we have any 'gals' here???). I'm humbled by the emails I've received since the update yesterday. Thanks for all the kind and supportive words! I truely appreciate all the offers to assist in so many different ways. Your feedback has given me the incentive to get my butt in gear and make sure this forum continues to be freely available to all Commander enthusiasts. At this time, I'm not happy with any of the alternative services that I've reviewed, so will probably go ahead and create my own listbot-like service. After reading all the email waiting for me this morning, it also occured to me that I need to make sure the list and web site will be able to continue should something ever happen to me. Once I get the new list-server online, I'm going to burn a CDROM of the web site and mail server system and send it to Capt Jimbob. Everything is currently backed up nightly on 4mm DAT tape and stored in a bank vault, but I've not arranged for someone else to take it over should the need arise. Thanks again to everyone! Chris Schuermann ps: Keith - might want to hold up on that sainthood until I actually get something to work :-) Since I live in Oklahoma is that going to make me a "redneck patron saint" ? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 24, 2001
From: Milt <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Long Day
Long day yesterday, Gary Gadberry brought N414C down to Gulfport and spent the entire day going over it with mechanic. Flew an hour to altitude to check pressurization then took Gary home to Chatanooga and brought the plane back to Gulfport. Put it in the hangar about 2AM. Gary is one hell of a nice guy. Lots of squaks to work off and lots of training to do for the transition. Keith you were right it loves to suck up runway and climbs like a Pig. Your numbers from the flight log were pretty accurate. At max gross @ 18,000, 33", 2650 rpm, 100 deg rich of peak burnt 284lbs/hr. estimated TAS was about 195. Its a lot different from the 560 but at least it has a real flight manual. Today I'm waiting for a call from Big Al hes supposed to be nearby house hunting and promised to stop by so I could rub Lucilles ------. He needs to take his laptop with him It gets kind of boring going several days without his comments. If I can get adequate transition training in the 685 in time and Big All and I can get off from work we plan on coming to the fly in. We may stop and get Blake on the way. (Jimbo well let you know as soon as we know) Anyone heard of or dealt with recurrent training center in Savoy Illinois ? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 24, 2001
From: Arizphys(at)aol.com <Arizphys(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: WOW!
Yep.....you do have at least one gal here. I enjoy reading all of your posts! Kristina Huffman Mesa, AZ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 24, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: WOW!
In a message dated 06/24/01 06:43:46 Pacific Daylight Time, chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com writes: > ps: Keith - might want to hold up on that sainthood until I > actually get something to work :-) Since I live in Oklahoma is > that going to make me a "redneck patron saint" ? > Yup. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 24, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Long Day
In a message dated 06/24/01 07:26:51 Pacific Daylight Time, mdcmd@ms-online.com writes: > Gary Gadberry brought N414C down to Gulfport and spent the entire day going > over it with mechanic. > Flew an hour to altitude to check pressurization then took Gary home to > Chatanooga and brought the plane back to Gulfport. Put it in the hangar > about 2AM. > Put it in the hangar at 02:00? This sound very much like the words of a man who just bought an airplane. Congratulations! Now the fun begins .... ~Wing Commander Gordon~ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 24, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: IFR Trainer
HI KIDS............ I am slowly working on getting triple 2 IFR ready. I just bought a new GPS (King Skymap 111C) I love it!! Now this is an HSI. I am planing to by a procedures trainer for my computer. I am looking at one now that offers a baron 58 as one of the airplanes to train with. The whole thing is about $350 and seems to really work well. Any suggestions?? jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 24, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Re: IFR Trainer
YOURTCFG(at)aol.com wrote: > I am slowly working on getting triple 2 IFR ready. I just bought a new > GPS (King Skymap 111C) Nifty looking piece of hardware JB. Just curious - if you're shooting for IFR capability, why didn't you go with an ifr gps? FYI, Garmin has a free simulator for their 400/500 series products which is mighty impressive. chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 24, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: NEW FEATURE
I've decided to add something new to the web site to get a bit more action going on - THE COMMANDER OF THE MONTH... Here's the scoop: Email one or two of your favorite pictures (preferably at least one with YOU with your Commander). Please use jpeg format if at all possible. Write a short piece about yourself and your bird. Email to me (chris@c2-tech.com). I know we've got a LOT of owners on the list now. Here's your chance to become famous and respected by your peers. :-) Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 24, 2001
From: ctro(at)att.net <ctro(at)att.net>
Subject: recurrent training center
In response to Milt's question about Recurrent Training Center - I attended several years ago for a Navajo Chieftain because they said it was insurance approved, and it was, but I don't know how. I got an instructor who had never even seen a Navajo. We did some Frasca sim training for 2 days - 4 hours each - then had me do a workbook on the airplane. I already had 700 hours in type and started asking some deep questions on systems about qwerks, etc. but he couldn't answer them. The sim was set us as a Seminole or something and nothing was said about turbos or higher performance cabin class twins. A bright spot was the owner of the place was an air traffic control guy for CHAMPAIGNE APPROACH. He had some good insight into the pilot - controller relationship that you can only find from a pilot-controller. He also had some videos that he made on radar and weather that were ok. Would I go back for anything? NO. All I feel that I gained from the 3 days was a brush up on my basic instrument skills (which I could have done much more inexpensively at the local university's sim). Some videos can be obtained from Sporty's along the same lines and would probably be more professional. Would/Could I recommend them for insurance requirements or to learn anything about your airplane? NO My personal opinion is to get a good IPC from a good instructor in your airplane (no engine snatchin'). Talk over systems,weather, and your instrumentation. If you need basic brush up, find an Elite sim (desktop sim-can be approved for dual with the right setup) and use a nice cabin class twin setup, train for engine care, systems, emergencies, failures, etc., then go to your plane. Anyone else been to this place? Regards Clark ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 25, 2001
From: RnJThompson(at)aol.com <RnJThompson(at)aol.com>
Subject: Ozzie Flight manuals
Hi all, I will endeavour to get hold of copies of fligt manuals for the following models. 500A,500B,500U,500S,560E,680,680E,680F,680FL,680FLP,685. Sir Barry kindly sent me a list of the commanders sent to OZ. I am busy tracking the above ones down. I will give JB copies of all the manuals I get hold of for his records. Regards, Richard ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 25, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: ANOTHER NICE FLIGHT
HI KIDS.................. Well, What a great ride home today (nothing like commuting to and from work in a Commander) I left BFI and headed north to Arlington for a quick stop at TCAC. Had a brief chat with Jeff, Pierre and Ken Moulson from Aero Air. We talked a bit about SB214 and I think I will change my letter to the FAA regarding that action. It sounds like they are really finding major problems with the airplanes that have been looked at. It is a mute point really as the FAA made it clear to me that they are going to issue an AD. Left there and flew to Roach Harbor. Sue and I are looking around at some options to retire on an airport and it cant get better than Roach. A beautiful view of the bay looking across a 3300 foot strip (narrow and obstructed, but plenty good for a commander) The approach to the East is over the Harbor and quant marina/town. To the West, it is pretty downhill and over the trees on final. Got stooped in 1/2 the length (gota love those Clevelands)! Looked at the house that was available and then Rocky and I walked into town and had a burger on the dock. Greet view of the marina. I had been there in the float plane before as well. Neat place. Blasted out of there (after a starter problem ???) and straight home 209 sm. What a difference a little heading change can make. The course from Roach took me a lot farther west than usual, and I started 50 miles farther north as well. This trip is down the East slope of the Olympic range. These are 7500 ft high, snow capped peaks that look like baby Alps. Lots of vertical rise!! Beautiful!! I see them all the time on the biplane rides but from always from a distance. Today I was right over them (7500 feet and the Iguana seemed OK??) It was a great clear day and SEA and Tacoma passed well to the East. There are a million islands that make up the San Juan chain and they were all out there today. What a great view. Those coming to the Flyin will get to see this for yourself. Fjords and little marinas and towns dot the endless shoreline with the Cascade Mountains far to the East. I was monitoring 122.9 along the way and was able to chat with some of my seaplane buddies driving Beavers and Turbo Otters into downtown SEA. Right over the top of Olympia, the state capitol and on to MT St. Helen and home. The first 15 minutes were on top of a low overcast that became broken and the scattered, what a hoot blasting around the cloud tops! My new GPS worked great and I love it. Had a little headwind, abut 190mph cruse. It was a great trip (except for the starter??) and they had just mowed the grass where I park, I just love the way a Commander looks parked on the grass, dont you! Anyway, it was a great weekend, hope yours was as well. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 26, 2001
From: Randy Sharp <sharp.r(at)apple.com>
Subject: Re: two cents on ME training
Very good write-up Dave! (You actually sound like one of my old USAF instructors!) The military flies many types of complex aircraft, (imagine a 22 year old young man sitting behind one of those sticks), in order to avoid overwhelming mishaps the training has to be very stringent, dedicated, and encompassing... This is done for a very good reason; safety. If you look at a typical dash 1 (The instructions used for each individual type aircraft), you'll find 4 major areas common to every aircraft which are found in the emergency section. 1. MAINTAIN AIRCRAFT CONTROL (fly the aircraft, this is primary in ALL cases) 2. ANALYZE THE SITUATION (you must know the systems to be able to do this, simulator training, troubleshooting, basic airman knowledge etc) 3. TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION (bold face ITEMS, these are a set of critical, memorized, specific, sequence of steps taken). You must know these by rote memory with no hesitations-this is more related to complex systems) (I still brief - "no fast hands in the cockpit") 4. REFER TO CHECKLIST (as time permits, cleanup items, alternate course of actions etc). I have found that these 4 line items work just about anywhere and are not just for the USAF. Each area can be subdivided into appropriate sections for discussions, training, confidence building drills, hanger talk scenarios, systems knowledge lesson plans, preflight discussions, profile regiments (ie your mission), recurrency training etc... You can almost build a complete ME course just by using these 4 simple statements. Maybe the next time you search out for ME training try to see if these 4 areas are included in the training syllabus, it might just be worth the money. Regards, >Gentlemen, > >I have had the unique opportunity to transition many new ME pilots into >high performance twins, as a instructor pilot/checkairman for a major Part >135 Cargo operation. > >We flew Barons, Aerostars and Chieftons. I also own an geared Twin >Commander and have a good amount of time in various radial engines (which >are treated much the same as our geared Lycs.) I continue to do high >performance twin checkouts and training to supplement my meager existence >flying CRJs. > >I don't intend to sound like an expert here, because I learn something new >everday I fly. The day I stop learning will be the day something really >bad happens..... > >There were several weak areas common to most of the pilots I had to >opportunity to transition. > >1. Basic instrument skills. Anyone flying a high performance twin should >be a competent instrument pilot. Bottom line. One of the toughest items >I needed to drill out of most people was that at the end of an instrument >approach we LAND! Most CFII's spend a great deal of time on the missed >approach, that's fine, but the one of the most critical phases is the >transition in a high performance twin from instrument to visual reference, >on course, on speed and configured for landing. Landing from the circle, >descent to MDA, on and on...high performance twins all have their unique >set of limitations that need to be respected, turbos, geared engines, etc. > The workload under instrument conditions, to minimums ups the stress >exponentially. We did all of our training under night, IFR real world >conditions (icing, turbulence, t-storms, you name it). > >2. Single-engine operations. Mixtures, props, throttles, identify, >verify, feather. Where did all this troubleshooting come in? Flight >instructors. The good and bad about flying piston twins in cargo is that >you get some real good practice in malfunctions. I have yet to have an >engine quit without me being real sure about which one. Most failures are >dramatic, unless it is a precautionary shutdown. My point is FLY THE >AIRPLANE. As soon as the engine is caged, leave well enough alone. Sure >if a fire is present there are specific actions that you need to take care >of like shutting of fluids, etc., but I was never at a loss of amazement >when our new pilots would be so busy "troubleshooting" that they would >loose control of the airplane. (Remember, I train in real world conditions) > >3. Profiles. Those of us who fly for a living (i.e.-someone else's >airplane) fly by very specific profiles. Those profiles are there for a >reason. To get you into the air, or to the runway at the appropriate >speed, configuration -- safely! You would be amazed how you can hit the >marker in an Aerostar at 250kts, and land in 200 and 1/2 on speed if you >follow a profile. Workload is decreased, and your attention is directed >to flying the aircraft. I train everyone I fly with in a twin to follow >very specific profiles and procedures, just like they were their own 135 >operation. I require all profiles and procedures for any given make or >model of aircraft to be memorized PRIOR to ever leaving the ground with a >student. I don't work cheap, and the effort spent here saves big bucks. > >4. Basic airman knowledge. If your limitations are not memorized, and >emergency procedures (kill items) are not memorized and heaven forbid, if >you cannot do a blindfold check of your cockpit, you are not ready to >transition. Again back to instrument skills (yes, even if you fly VFR >most of the time). I often find that it is not the stick and rudder >issues that get people killed, it is the "distractions". Letting ATC fly >the airplane, not being able to quickly set up for the approach, etc. One >thing leads to another. > >Well, now you all see why I often don't speak up too often. I get way too >wordy. I think if I go on any longer, I may be banned for life from all >further discussions! I have some definite opinions on how ME training >should go. I welcome comments, criticism and suggestions. My goal here >is to help, not preach..I am not worthy :-). > >I am happy to have the opportunity to lend my two cents.....I will now >duck... > >Regards, >David Costa >airshow(at)earthlink.net >614-336-8211 ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ Major Randy "Laser" Sharp ANG/USAF, MEII-A/H The ultimate vertical Flight experience. HH-60G...PaveHawk "The Jolly Green Giants" 129TH RQS "RESCUE SERVICE"; Fly Safe! AC-500B Twin Commander "N6367U" "-within the hearts of all who fly, lives the child who once stood at the gate to their future-" ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 26, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: rncp
Guess WHO? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 26, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <tylorh(at)sound.net>
Subject: Re: rncp
Big Al, Are you ready for your check ride?? Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 -----Original Message----- From: Allen Reed [mailto:allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 10:01 PM To: tcfg(at)listbot.com Subject: rncp Guess WHO? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 26, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: ride
Hey Gang,Had to cancel ride for tommorrow.My schedule and Clark's got all out of wack so no fine tuning.DE has agreed to work me in at any time I feel that I'm ready,which I hope is soon.Bought house in PNS and will be moving soon,but if every thing works right,will be at the Flying with my soon-to-be new neighbor Uncle Milty.Best to ALL! AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 26, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: ride
In a message dated 6/26/01 9:01:03 PM Pacific Daylight Time, allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com writes: << will be at the Flying with my soon-to-be new neighbor Uncle Milty.Best to ALL! AL >> HEY AL, Cant wait to meet you!! be safe. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 26, 2001
From: John Vormbaum <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: ride
Big Al, You BETTER make it to the flyin! I haven't suffered your emails for all these months for nothing! ;-) Plus, I want to meet a REAL RNCP. Us California surfer-pilots have never seen one, dude.... /John ----- Original Message ----- From: "Allen Reed" <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com> To: Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 9:00 PM Subject: ride > > > Hey Gang,Had to cancel ride for tommorrow.My schedule and Clark's got all > out of wack so no fine tuning.DE has agreed to work me in at any time I feel > that I'm ready,which I hope is soon.Bought house in PNS and will be moving > soon,but if every thing works right,will be at the Flying with my soon-to-be > new neighbor Uncle Milty.Best to ALL! AL > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 26, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: fly-in apparel
Gents, What happens when a guy flies his warbird in to the TCFG fly-in because his partner is taking the Aero Commander on vacation after the event? Barry Hancock FNG ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 26, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: enough
The suspense is killing me! What's the knee technique? Barry > Does anybody use the knee-technique in identifying a dead engine? Aw, I am > sure you all know it well. > Nico ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 26, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: fly-in apparel
In a message dated 06/27/01 00:08:12 Pacific Daylight Time, bdogltd(at)pacbell.net writes: > What happens when a guy flies his warbird in to the TCFG fly-in because his > Of course, we'll have to call a meeting of the ethics committee, the Standards and Practices committee and the Confederacy of RNCPs, but under the circumstances, I'm sure you'll breeze right through the process. Just don't show up wearing a green nomex flight suit just because you're in a war bird. However, boxers or briefs? Your call. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Milt <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Re: rncp
AL We were beginning to wonder if maybe some yankees kidnapped you in Pensacola and were holding you for ransom. We collected 37cents and 2 used condoms to bail you out. How did the house hunting go? Milt ----- Original Message ----- From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com> To: Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 10:00 PM Subject: rncp > > > Guess WHO? > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Milt <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Re: ride
Let me be perfectly clear about one thing! Uncle Milty (as Milton Berle was known) is rumored to have liked little boys and was Liberaces best friend. I AM NOT AT ALL LIKE UNCLE MILTY even though the whole world calls everyone named Milt that. I definately prefer aerocommanders and girls. Milt ----- Original Message ----- From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com> To: Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 11:00 PM Subject: ride > > > Hey Gang,Had to cancel ride for tommorrow.My schedule and Clark's got all > out of wack so no fine tuning.DE has agreed to work me in at any time I feel > that I'm ready,which I hope is soon.Bought house in PNS and will be moving > soon,but if every thing works right,will be at the Flying with my soon-to-be > new neighbor Uncle Milty.Best to ALL! AL > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Milt <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Re: fly-in apparel
We immediately suspect that you are a voyeur and really dont fly a commander. ----- Original Message ----- From: Barry Hancock To: tcfg(at)listbot.com Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 2:16 AM Subject: fly-in apparel Gents, What happens when a guy flies his warbird in to the TCFG fly-in because his partner is taking the Aero Commander on vacation after the event? Barry Hancock FNG ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Ricardo A. Otaola <otayca(at)telcel.net.ve>
Subject: 680F
Hi Gnag: I have got the check list for the 680F, as well as the maintenance manual, and the ops manual. Anyone??? Pls send the exact location of the Fly-in as I am trying to see if I can go. It will take about 3-4 days to get there. Also, I have not decided to go through Central America-Mexico, California, Oregon, or just go from FLA, all the way up to Oregon, I will take advice on stop overs. Thanks Ricardo A. Otaola Gerente General Newcom Venezuela 582-9934234 / 0904 rotaola(at)newcomamericas.net www.newcomamericas.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: PSSST!
Hey Milt,I'll give you a call tonight on the phone.By the way;haven't heard any mention about how many student nurse FLIGHT ATTENDENTS we will be using.Just trying to figure out how much grocery money I'll need. Have a great one! AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Re: 680F
> "Ricardo A. Otaola" wrote: > Pls send the exact location of the Fly-in Ricardo, I have some info on the flyin on the web site: http://www.aerocommander.com Looking forward to seeing you there! Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: TILLMAN333(at)aol.com <TILLMAN333(at)aol.com>
Subject: TWO PLANES, WIFE SAYS ONE MUST GO. (not the Commander)
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Mark Woodley Earthlink <woodlema(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: PSSST!
This is by far one of the BEST uses of Jumbo jets EVER. http://milehighclub.com/virgin.html ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Mark Woodley Earthlink <woodlema(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: MHCO, rules, and regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 61 (Docket No. 75487345, Notice No. 95-523040306) ---- REGULATION OF MILE HIGH CLUB OPERATIONS ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) SUMMARY: This notice proposes to require additional qualifications and testing before a certificated pilot may engage or continue to engage in Mile High Club Operations (MHCO) while also exercising the privileges of a pilot certificate. DATES: Comments should be received before December 31, 1999. ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed or delivered in sextuplicate to: Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Chief Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket (AGC-204), Docket No. 75487345, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington DC 20591. Comments may be examined in the Rules Docket weekdays, except Federal holidays, between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Need for Rulemaking Under the provisions of the East Chitlin Switch, Kansas, Wheat Silo Subsidy Act (P.L. 100-872398-A), Congress has mandated the FAA to regulate the activities of the formerly unregulated Mile High Club (MHC). Under present rules, anything accomplished at an altitude of one statute mile (5,280 feet) above ground level (AGL), regardless of the degree of difficulty or the level of expertise demanded, earns a certificated pilot a scroll illustrated by Milton Caniff and a three-color bumper sticker. Through a procedure of self-regulation, the organization has set forth requirements that activities take place at an altitude of at least 5,280 feet above ground level to prevent Denver pilots from messing around on the ramp. Although the organization has adopted rigid admission requirements for its pilot members, a recent National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) report disclosed an accident in a light training aircraft (LTA) caused by pilot error in the form of disorientation of a student pilot (sex unknown) after the Certified Flight Instructor (CFI) (sex unknown) attempted to introduce the student to a maneuver not included in the MHC syllabus. Similarly, the crash of a corporate-owned Learjet in western Pennsylvania was thought to have been caused by the absence of the crew from the cockpit at the time the aircraft arrived in Pittsburgh. Further, evidence suggests that some hitherto unexplained accidents may have been due to pilot fatigue following Mile High Club Operations (MHCO) activities. These accidents have amply demonstrated that there is a compelling need for regulation of MHCO activities for the protection of the public and property under the flight paths of such aircraft. The FAA is proposing to expand the scope of Part 61 of the FARs by the addition of paragraphs 61.300 through 61.305 to prohibit the propositioning of any occupant of a certificated aircraft by any licensed and current pilot who has not first demonstrated the ability to execute the duties of pilot-in-command and/or co-pilot to the satisfaction of an Operations Inspector or a designated Pilot Examiner. It is further proposed to establish minimum experience, age, and skill levels for the issuance of MHCO ratings to pilots' certificates. To ensure that a satisfactory level of proficiency is maintained by certificated pilots possessing MHCO ratings, it is proposed that biennial proficiency reviews be mandated. Environmental Impact Statement The adoption of these regulations is not anticipated to have a significant impact upon the environment including an impact upon population pressures. Economic Impact Statement The proposed rules would not materially impact the economics of MHCO activities, including those conducted for hire under Part 135. Definitions For the purposes of this NPRM, the following Definitions are established: PILOT: An applicant for or possessor of a MHCO rating regardless of sex, creed, color, political affiliation, proclivities, or physical dimensions. CO-PILOT: Any person regardless of sex, creed, color, political affiliation, proclivities, or physical dimensions assisting a certificated, MHCO-rated pilot in carrying out MHCO activities. PASSENGER: Any reliable witness to an MHCO flight test who does not actively participate. FLIGHT ENGINEER: Anyone other than a co-pilot who assists the pilot in establishing the proper conditions for accomplishing the minimum requirements of MHCO activities. AIRCRAFT: Any vehicle aloft suitable for MHCO activities. Does not include automobiles or parachutists falling from high places. GLIDER: Anyone performing an MHCO activity entirely in mid-air such as during the free-fall period of a parachute jump. HANG GLIDER: Glider with above-average equipment. SOLO FLIGHT: A practice session where the pilot is the sole manipulator of the controls. DUAL FLIGHT: An MHCO activity during which the pilot uses both hands. AUTOPILOT AUTHORIZATION: An authorization from the FAA permitting someone else to do it for a shy pilot. The Proposed Rule For reasons set forth above, the FAA is proposing to amend Part 61 of the Federal Aviation Regulations as follows: PART 61 - [AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for Part 61 continues to read as follows: Authority: Secs. 313(a), 314, 601, 602, Federal Aviation Act of 1958, 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1355, 1421, 1422; sec. 6(c), Department of Transportation Act, 49 U.S.S. 1655(2), unless otherwise noted. 2. Section 61 would be amended by adding the following: 61.300 An applicant for a Mile High Club Operations (MHCO) rating on a pilot certificate must meet the following minimum qualifications: (a) The applicant must have reached his/her fifteenth birthday or possess a deep voice. (b) The applicant must present a high school diploma or equivalent indicating a grade of Failing or better, or a notarized statement proving the applicant has compromised at least one substitute teacher. 61.301 An applicant for an MHCO rating must pass a written examination on the following applicable aviation subjects: (a) Care, operation, a periodic maintenance of articulating seats in certificated U.S. civil aircraft. (b) Basic anatomy and other considerations in selecting a co-pilot. (c) Dangers associated with the destruction of aircraft panel instruments by bare feet. 61.302 An applicant for an MHCO rating will be tested on the following maneuvers: (a) Takeoffs. Applicant will prepare the co-pilot for MHCO activities. (b) Stalls. Applicant will demonstrate any acceptable and workable method of delay maneuvering to avoid premature results. (c) Approaches. Applicant will demonstrate at least six (6) precision or three (3) non-precision approaches to a co-pilot who does not suspect the purpose of the flight. (d) Soft Field Landings. Applicant will show proficiency in selecting procedures to be utilized under soft conditions. (e) Short Field Landings. Applicant will show proficiency in utilizing the proper procedures under short conditions. (f) Forced Landings. Applicant will accomplish the minimum MHCO activities despite co-pilot's objections. (g) On-pylon Eights. Applicant will select two prominent landmarks and maneuver between them. If the co-pilot is not endowed with sufficiently prominent landmarks, the activity may be performed in a flight simulator approved by the Administrator. (h) In-flight Emergencies. Applicant will conduct a suitable approach with the zipper jammed in the "up" position and will demonstrate the smooth emergency extension of gear before contact. (i) Holding Patterns. The Applicant will show proficiency in covering all points of interest with only two hands. (j) Radio Navigation. Applicant will insert the radial into the omnibearing selector and achieve station passage before the "off" flag appears. (k) Back Course Approach. Not an approved procedure. (l) Diverting to an Alternate. Applicant will make an approach to a passenger when it becomes obvious that the original destination has gone below minimums because of a cold front. (m) Maneuvering with an Inoperative Engine. Self explanatory. (n) Weather Recognition. Applicant will readily identify cold fronts and warm fronts with the cockpit lights inoperative. (o)Lost Communications Procedures. Applicant will show proficiency in blocking the co-pilot's voice channel using a broad-band antenna with great frequency. 61.303 Proficiency Review. (a) No person may conduct MHCO activities unless, within the preceding 24 months, that person has -- 1.. Accomplished a proficiency review given to him, in an aircraft for which the person is rated, by an appropriately certificated flight instructor or other person designated by the Administrator who possesses a valid MHCO Inspection Authorization. 2.. Had his/her log book endorsed by the person conducting the review certifying that the person has satisfactorily accomplished all the required activities of the review. 3.. However, a person who has, within the preceding 24 months, satisfactorily completed an MHCO proficiency check conducted by the FAA or otherwise been satisfactorily screwed by the FAA need not accomplish the flight review required by this section. 61.304 General Experience. No person may engage in MHCO activities as pilot-in-command of an aircraft carrying passengers, nor of an aircraft certificated for more than one required pilot flight crewmember unless within the preceding 90 days that person has satisfactorily carried out MHCO activities and has made suitable log book entries attesting the fact. This requirement does not apply to persons holding an airline transport pilot certificate or to activities conducted while operating under part 135 of this chapter. 61.305 Instrument Experience. No person may engage in MHCO activities unless, during the preceding 6 months, that person has conducted MHCO operations in the immediate vicinity of cold fronts and successfully logged at least 6 hours under actual or simulated IFR conditions which involved at least six approaches. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: fly-in apparel
Of course, we'll have to call a meeting of the ethics committee, the Standards and Practices committee and the Confederacy of RNCPs, but under the circumstances, I'm sure you'll breeze right through the process. Phew! OK, I'll buy the beer. Just don't show up wearing a green nomex flight suit just because you're in a war bird. Hey, mister, you try flying a 40 yr. old, round engine, bird with the fuel pump mere inches from the exhaust stacks and just a couple feet from your toes. Do I think it looks cool? No, I wear an ugly green nomex flight suit because it might one day save my life. But then again, I sit in the left seat of the Commander and reach for my parachute straps... I'll just taxi to the far side of the field and take my flightsuit off before I get out of the airplane, if that'll make you feel better. However, boxers or briefs? Your call. I'm a boxer-breif kinda guy. But thanks for the "descretion" call. :) Barry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: fly-in apparel
In a message dated 06/27/01 08:52:10 Pacific Daylight Time, bdogltd(at)pacbell.net writes: > I'm a boxer-breif kinda guy. But thanks for the "descretion" call. I knew the green nomex flight suit thing would get ya! OK, you'll be the guy walking across the ramp in green nomex boxer-briefs, carrying beer. I'm sure you'll have no trouble gaining access to the Fly-In. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Milt Concannon <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Re: fly-in apparel
I dug out my 33 year old Marine Corps nomex flight suit and found it had shrunk so much that I couldn,t even get 1 leg into it. Thats probably good because my wife said i'd be as attractive in it as I would a Speedo bathing suit. I just dont understand how a dry flight suit could shrink like that. Im certainly no bigger than 30 years ago. In any case being a redneck Al and I will probably wear bib overalls. Milt ----- Original Message ----- From: Barry Hancock To: CloudCraft(at)aol.com Cc: tcfg(at)listbot.com Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 10:52 AM Subject: Re: fly-in apparel Of course, we'll have to call a meeting of the ethics committee, the Standards and Practices committee and the Confederacy of RNCPs, but under the circumstances, I'm sure you'll breeze right through the process. Phew! OK, I'll buy the beer. Just don't show up wearing a green nomex flight suit just because you're in a war bird. Hey, mister, you try flying a 40 yr. old, round engine, bird with the fuel pump mere inches from the exhaust stacks and just a couple feet from your toes. Do I think it looks cool? No, I wear an ugly green nomex flight suit because it might one day save my life. But then again, I sit in the left seat of the Commander and reach for my parachute straps... I'll just taxi to the far side of the field and take my flightsuit off before I get out of the airplane, if that'll make you feel better. However, boxers or briefs? Your call. I'm a boxer-breif kinda guy. But thanks for the "descretion" call. :) Barry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <tylorh(at)sound.net>
Subject: Re: fly-in apparel
Barry, What do we look for you in when you arrive? Warbird aircraft Type? Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 -----Original Message----- From: Barry Hancock [mailto:bdogltd(at)pacbell.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 10:52 AM To: CloudCraft(at)aol.com Cc: tcfg(at)listbot.com Subject: Re: fly-in apparel _____ _____ Of course, we'll have to call a meeting of the ethics committee, the Standards and Practices committee and the Confederacy of RNCPs, but under the circumstances, I'm sure you'll breeze right through the process. Phew! OK, I'll buy the beer. Just don't show up wearing a green nomex flight suit just because you're in a war bird. Hey, mister, you try flying a 40 yr. old, round engine, bird with the fuel pump mere inches from the exhaust stacks and just a couple feet from your toes. Do I think it looks cool? No, I wear an ugly green nomex flight suit because it might one day save my life. But then again, I sit in the left seat of the Commander and reach for my parachute straps... I'll just taxi to the far side of the field and take my flightsuit off before I get out of the airplane, if that'll make you feel better. However, boxers or briefs? Your call. I'm a boxer-breif kinda guy. But thanks for the "descretion" call. :) Barry _____ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: fly-in apparel
OK, you'll be the guy walking across the ramp in green nomex boxer-briefs, carrying beer. I'm sure you'll have no trouble gaining access to the Fly-In. Nah, my nomex boxer-breifs are *dark blue*! What's the preferred brew of the RNCP? Barry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: fly-in apparel
Barry, What do we look for you in when you arrive? A green nomex flight suit! Warbird aircraft Type? Oooooh, that. A Yak-3U. Wait, sorry, that's what it wants to be when it grows up (and daddy has LOTS of money to burn!). It's a Nanchang CJ-6A. Barry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: Knee technique
Thanks, Nico. Sounds like a great IFR tool... Barry ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nico van Niekerk" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com> To: "Barry Hancock" Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 3:21 AM Subject: Knee technique > Hi Barry, > I responded already to the list about it, but here it is again. > Thanks, > Nico > > Well, it's very simple and designed to identify the dead engine without > rational thought (which means automatic action) and allow the pilot to > maintain control of the airplane. When an engine quits, just keep the plane > straight and the knee that comes up is the dead engine. You don't think but > automatically keep the plane straight, pull the power lever on the motor > that's on the side of the 'up' knee to positively identify and then feather. > A very safe two-step process done in less than five seconds. With practice a > pilot can focus on other things while doing this. To test proficiency, ask > the pilot to add from 1 to 20 while performing this procedure. Better would > be to read out the airspeed at one-second intervals. This forces the pilot > to focus on something else while identifying and feathering the dead motor. > If the pilot has to interpret the ball on the turn-and-bank to identify the > dead engine precious time and attitude is lost. Not only has the plane > already started to roll into the dead engine, but rough whether can confuse > the pilot causing the live engine to be feathered instead or control lost > completely. If that happens, and there is altitude, the only remedy is to > throttle back on > both engines, stabilize and start again. If not, well then it's sad. > Nico > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net> > To: Nico van Niekerk > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 12:24 AM > Subject: Re: enough > > > > The suspense is killing me! What's the knee technique? > > > > Barry > > > > > Does anybody use the knee-technique in identifying a dead engine? Aw, I > am > > > sure you all know it well. > > > Nico > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Paul Odum <calnet01(at)gte.net>
Subject: Re: fly-in apparel
Guys, If you are worried about it Barry and I will fly the RF-104 up. Forgoet that Commander crap ! 350 KTS in the break and you are handled. Paul P51PAUL Tylor Hall wrote: > > Barry, > > What do we look for you in when you arrive? > > Warbird aircraft Type? > > Regards, > > Tylor Hall > > tylorh(at)sound.net > > 913-422-8869 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Barry Hancock [mailto:bdogltd(at)pacbell.net] > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 10:52 AM > To: CloudCraft(at)aol.com > Cc: tcfg(at)listbot.com > Subject: Re: fly-in apparel > > Of course, we'll have to call a meeting of the ethics committee, the > > Standards and Practices committee and the Confederacy of RNCPs, but > under the > circumstances, I'm sure you'll breeze right through the process. > > Phew! OK, I'll buy the beer. > > Just don't show up wearing a green nomex flight suit just because > you're in a > war bird. > > Hey, mister, you try flying a 40 yr. old, round engine, bird with the > fuel pump mere inches from the exhaust stacks and just a couple feet > from your toes. Do I think it looks cool? No, I wear an ugly green > nomex flight suit because it might one day save my life. But then > again, I sit in the left seat of the Commander and reach for my > parachute straps... > > I'll just taxi to the far side of the field and take my flightsuit off > before I get out of the airplane, if that'll make you feel better. > > However, boxers or briefs? Your call. > > I'm a boxer-breif kinda guy. But thanks for the "descretion" call. > :) > > Barry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Randy Sharp <sharp.r(at)apple.com>
Subject: Re: nomex protection
mdcmd@ms-online.com said: >I dug out my 33 year old Marine Corps nomex flight suit and found it had >shrunk so much that I couldn,t even get 1 leg into it. Thats probably good >because my wife said i'd be as attractive in it as I would a Speedo >bathing suit. I just dont understand how a dry flight suit could shrink >like that. Im certainly no bigger than 30 years ago. In any case being a >redneck Al and I will probably wear bib overalls. >Milt Hi Milt, Just to let you know that nomex protection does have a limitation. If the flight suit has been washed excessively or is of old material then the protection will not be very helpful in a fire. (flash fire protection etc) If you can hold it up to the light and see right thru it (very little tint) then I would say that for personal protection it would be better for you to wear a cotton overall. I have some old flight suits that I finally put in the garbage for just that reason. The life of the garment is subject to how well it has been maintained and the age of the material. Might want to read the fine print on the label if it's still intact. Unless of course you are just using it for looks and really don't care about the protection. Randy ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Paul Odum <calnet01(at)gte.net>
Subject: Re: nomex protection
Guys, If you wash a nomex flight suit one time they are no good - they aren't much good anyway if you have a real fire in the cockpit. I fly Phantom II's and an CF-104 (I always say RF-104 for some reason) a few times a week. I get my flight suits retreated after every wash. By the way - I have some Size 36 brand new flight suits if anyone is interested. I'll let them go for $60.00 each. P51PAUL Randy Sharp wrote: > > > mdcmd@ms-online.com said: > > >I dug out my 33 year old Marine Corps nomex flight suit and found it had > >shrunk so much that I couldn,t even get 1 leg into it. Thats probably good > >because my wife said i'd be as attractive in it as I would a Speedo > >bathing suit. I just dont understand how a dry flight suit could shrink > >like that. Im certainly no bigger than 30 years ago. In any case being a > >redneck Al and I will probably wear bib overalls. > >Milt > > Hi Milt, > > Just to let you know that nomex protection does have a limitation. > If the flight suit has been washed excessively or is of old material then > the protection will not be very helpful in a fire. (flash fire protection > etc) > > If you can hold it up to the light and see right thru it (very little > tint) then I would say that for personal protection it would be better > for you to wear a cotton overall. > > I have some old flight suits that I finally put in the garbage for just > that reason. > The life of the garment is subject to how well it has been maintained and > the age of the material. > > Might want to read the fine print on the label if it's still intact. > Unless of course you are just using it for looks and really don't care > about the protection. > Randy > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: nomex protection
> > If you wash a nomex flight suit one time they are no good - they aren't much > good anyway if you have a real fire in the cockpit. > All I'm asking for is a few seconds so I can get the heck out of the cockpit without 3rd degree burns...if I have a real fire in the cockpit, I've waited too long to bail! But I digress...the real question is what type of beers do RNCP drink! We SDCP's like Corona's and other wussie beers you can put limes in.... Barry (2 beers to the first guy to figure out SDCP) Hancock ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Beer derby
In a message dated 06/27/01 13:34:36 Pacific Daylight Time, bdogltd(at)pacbell.net writes: > > Barry (2 beers to the first guy to figure out SDCP) Hancock > Surfer Dude Commander Pilot (or, SouthernCalifornia Dude Comander Pilot) You might be a SDCP if you go to the fly-in BBQ and expect to be served a tofu burger. Did I win? Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: John Vormbaum <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: SDCP
> But I digress...the real question is what type of beers do RNCP drink! We > SDCP's like Corona's and other wussie beers you can put limes in.... > > Barry (2 beers to the first guy to figure out SDCP) Hancock Suds-Drinkin' Commander Pilots? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: TILLMAN333(at)aol.com <TILLMAN333(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: fly-in apparel
RNCP WE DRINK RED WHITE AND BLUE. $2.25 PER CASE. ALSO, IT IS USED FOR FUEL. STC'D BY MARCELL LEDBETTER. DO YOU KNOW HIM? HE WORKS FOR THE ATLANTA FSDO, AKA GADO. COON HUNTS AT NIGHT AND BUST KA-200 PILOTS FOR ILLEGAL PART 135. ORIGANALLY FROM CHATTANOOGA TENNESSEE. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: rncp
If You think an over night tie-down is something those funny dressing San-Francisco men do,you might be a RED NECKED COMMANDER PILOT! AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: rncp
If you are daring enough to put stops on your seat rails so that you can slide far enough back to kiss your Ass goodby,you might be a RED NECKED COMMANDER PILOT, AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: rncp
If you have a magnetic sign advertising your lawn mowing business stuck on your plane,you might be a RED NECKED COMMANDER PILOT! AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: rncp
If the field elevation of your airport is 615ft. and you are trying to convence the local barmaid(whom you have talked into coming to your hanger)that the reading opf 5,280ft. showing on the altimeter is RIGHT,you might be a RED NECKED COMMANDER PILOT! AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: rncp
If you open the side vent window and the hair in your ears gets caught in the prop,you might be a RED NECKED COMMANDER PILOT! AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: rncp
If you have a PINE scented tree hanging from you Vertical Card Compass,you might be a RED NECKED COMMANDER PILOT! AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: nomex protection
South Dakota Commander Pilot? Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net> To: Twin Commander Flightgroup Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 1:35 PM Subject: Re: nomex protection > > > > > > If you wash a nomex flight suit one time they are no good - they aren't > much > > good anyway if you have a real fire in the cockpit. > > > > All I'm asking for is a few seconds so I can get the heck out of the cockpit > without 3rd degree burns...if I have a real fire in the cockpit, I've waited > too long to bail! > > But I digress...the real question is what type of beers do RNCP drink! We > SDCP's like Corona's and other wussie beers you can put limes in.... > > Barry (2 beers to the first guy to figure out SDCP) Hancock > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <thall5(at)kc.rr.com>
Subject: New Web Site
Ricardo, I just found an interesting web site for flight planning to go to the TCFG fly in. www.airnav.com <http://www.airnav.com/> It only works with US airport identifiers, but once you get to the US, it could help you find the lowest cost fuel. I tried FXE to HIO. 2350 NM. Lowest fuel cost. Check it out. Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2001
From: Max Schuermann <max(at)greencis.net>
Subject: Re: New Web Site
Here's another pretty good site. http://www.aeroplanner.com Tylor Hall wrote: > I just found an interesting web site for flight planning to go to the > TCFG fly in. > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: FLYIN
HI KIDS... I just got a nice message from TCFG member Bob Murdock from NY requesting his registration form. Bob flies a really nice Shrike and is planing on attending the Flyin, Are you?? Have you requested your reg. form. If you have on, have you returned it?? Make you reservations soon at the Best Western and I hope to see all of you, it will be a blast!! Also, you will soon receive your copy of the TCAC magazine, Flight Levels. On the cover is a small photo of Chris and Dans 560E, Dreamcatcher. Look closely at the driver. It is a short, fat little guy from Washougal. We have a nice spot inside as well advertising our flyin. Thanks to Jim and Jeff and Mark Twombly for the help!!!! See ya there! capt jimbob ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2001
From: Paul Odum <calnet01(at)gte.net>
Subject: Re: nomex protection
Hi Nick, YEP - I have about 60 hours in the CF-104 now and I am still SCARED STRAGHT every time I get ready to fly the thing. 350 KTS in the break and 200 KTS on final. 160 KTS over the fence and hope the boundary layer fans keep working until the wheels stop rolling ! Paul Nico van Niekerk wrote: > Hi Paul, > The CF-104's are the Starfighters? (I'm new to the US so I apologize for a > stupid question) > Nico > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Paul Odum <calnet01(at)gte.net> > To: Randy Sharp > Cc: Twin Commander Flightgroup > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 12:21 PM > Subject: Re: nomex protection > > > > > > > Guys, > > > > If you wash a nomex flight suit one time they are no good - they aren't > much > > good anyway if you have a real fire in the cockpit. > > > > I fly Phantom II's and an CF-104 (I always say RF-104 for some reason) a > few > > times a week. I get my flight suits retreated after every wash. > > > > By the way - I have some Size 36 brand new flight suits if anyone is > > interested. I'll let them go for $60.00 each. > > > > P51PAUL > > > > Randy Sharp wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > mdcmd@ms-online.com said: > > > > > > >I dug out my 33 year old Marine Corps nomex flight suit and found it > had > > > >shrunk so much that I couldn,t even get 1 leg into it. Thats probably > good > > > >because my wife said i'd be as attractive in it as I would a Speedo > > > >bathing suit. I just dont understand how a dry flight suit could shrink > > > >like that. Im certainly no bigger than 30 years ago. In any case being > a > > > >redneck Al and I will probably wear bib overalls. > > > >Milt > > > > > > Hi Milt, > > > > > > Just to let you know that nomex protection does have a limitation. > > > If the flight suit has been washed excessively or is of old material > then > > > the protection will not be very helpful in a fire. (flash fire > protection > > > etc) > > > > > > If you can hold it up to the light and see right thru it (very little > > > tint) then I would say that for personal protection it would be better > > > for you to wear a cotton overall. > > > > > > I have some old flight suits that I finally put in the garbage for just > > > that reason. > > > The life of the garment is subject to how well it has been maintained > and > > > the age of the material. > > > > > > Might want to read the fine print on the label if it's still intact. > > > Unless of course you are just using it for looks and really don't care > > > about the protection. > > > Randy > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: rncp
Alright WUSSIE boys; found my stash.Ya'll can put your limes,your lemons,your olives,and your cherries in this and it's still gona' kick ya'lls RED NECKED COMMANDER PILOT wanna-bees Butts! That's right,I found my JUG of 5yr. old NO LABEL,now it's time to find out what ya'lls service ceiling is!SEE ya real soon. AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2001
From: TILLMAN333(at)aol.com <TILLMAN333(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: rncp
Speaking of Service Ceiling: I was talking with my good friend and insured, Richard Collins of Flying Magazine, today. The topic of discussion was FAR 61.13 High Altitude requirements, (check out.) And the April 15, 1991 date. this date applies to tail wheel endorsements, also. Is there a Piston Commander, pressurized, with a Service Ceiling above 25,000? How many of you guys Smoke? I think you know where I'm going with this... Any pilots out there experienced rapid decompression? Jerry S. if your out there sound off....You've flown 'em all... Thanks Guys, your letters may make to Flying Magazine. There's a lot of Great talent on this forum...Sound off. Gary Tillman ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Re: rncp
TILLMAN333(at)aol.com wrote: > Is there a Piston Commander, pressurized, with a Service Ceiling above > 25,000? > How many of you guys Smoke? I think you know where I'm going with this... > Any pilots out there experienced rapid decompression? Well, the 680FP/FLP I _think_ are, and I'm sure the 685 is... My little brother had a R-D experience a few years back and ruptured both eardrums. Was in considerable pain and off flight duty for some time... The FAA has a decompression chamber in OKC which I understand is available to any pilot. Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: rncp
I was'nt talking about their planes!!!!! AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: High Altitude Requirement
In a message dated 06/28/01 18:33:20 Pacific Daylight Time, TILLMAN333(at)aol.com writes: > Is there a Piston Commander, pressurized, with a Service Ceiling above > 25,000? No. Does that mean pilots of pressurized Commanders shouldn't get high altitude training requried by 61.13? No. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: 400 hp AC-560F?
Gentlemen and Lady, Have any of you heard of a 400 h.p. engine conversion on the Commander 560F? One of our list members is having one dangled in front of him and I've never heard of such an STC. That doesn't mean it can't or hasn't been done. I've just not heard of it. Any out there have knowledge of this? Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <tylorh(at)sound.net>
Subject: Re: 400 hp AC-560F?
Yes! I love short answers. MR RPM 400 HP conversion fits on 560F, 680F, and I think 500B's. I will check it with Dick McCoon tomorrow. I understand that with the short airframe, they can get with the program. Dick is working on intercoolers for the MR RPM conversions that could add up to 100 HP per side at altitude due to reduced inlet temperatures. It is part of his turbo kit he is working on for the 500 B's. Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 -----Original Message----- From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com [mailto:CloudCraft(at)aol.com] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 9:51 PM To: tcfg(at)listbot.com Subject: 400 hp AC-560F? _____ 1. Fill in the brief application 2. Receive approval decision within 30 seconds _____ Gentlemen and Lady, Have any of you heard of a 400 h.p. engine conversion on the Commander 560F? One of our list members is having one dangled in front of him and I've never heard of such an STC. That doesn't mean it can't or hasn't been done. I've just not heard of it. Any out there have knowledge of this? Wing Commander Gordon _____ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2001
From: Earthilnk Mail <woodlema(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: 400 hp AC-560F?
Shame he does not have the same conversion for the straight 560.. Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: Tylor Hall To: CloudCraft(at)aol.com ; tcfg(at)listbot.com Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 8:02 PM Subject: RE: 400 hp AC-560F? Yes! I love short answers. MR RPM 400 HP conversion fits on 560F, 680F, and I think 500B's. I will check it with Dick McCoon tomorrow. I understand that with the short airframe, they can get with the program. Dick is working on intercoolers for the MR RPM conversions that could add up to 100 HP per side at altitude due to reduced inlet temperatures. It is part of his turbo kit he is working on for the 500 B's. Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 -----Original Message----- From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com [mailto:CloudCraft(at)aol.com] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 9:51 PM To: tcfg(at)listbot.com Subject: 400 hp AC-560F? 1. Fill in the brief application 2. Receive approval decision within 30 seconds Gentlemen and Lady, Have any of you heard of a 400 h.p. engine conversion on the Commander 560F? One of our list members is having one dangled in front of him and I've never heard of such an STC. That doesn't mean it can't or hasn't been done. I've just not heard of it. Any out there have knowledge of this? Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2001
From: Milt <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Re: rncp
So does FAR 61.13 apply if the service ceiling is exactly 25,000? ----- Original Message ----- From: <TILLMAN333(at)aol.com> To: ; Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 8:32 PM Subject: Re: rncp > > > Speaking of Service Ceiling: > I was talking with my good friend and insured, Richard Collins of Flying > Magazine, today. > The topic of discussion was FAR 61.13 High Altitude requirements, (check > out.) > And the April 15, 1991 date. this date applies to tail wheel endorsements, > also. > Is there a Piston Commander, pressurized, with a Service Ceiling above > 25,000? > How many of you guys Smoke? I think you know where I'm going with this... > Any pilots out there experienced rapid decompression? > Jerry S. if your out there sound off....You've flown 'em all... > Thanks Guys, your letters may make to Flying Magazine. > There's a lot of Great talent on this forum...Sound off. > Gary Tillman > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Service ceiling
Well, I hope I am not totally off base here, if you don't mean the planes, Al. I was throwing parachuters out in South Africa, oh, maybe somewhere in the mid-1970's in a C182 with the right hand door and back seats removed in the dead of winter. My limited knowledge of the atmosphere tells me that the atmosphere is contracted in winter time and my service ceiling ought to be lower than what it would be in summer time. The drop zone was about 100 miles south of Johannesburg at a stadium where a local fair was being held and slap bang in the center of the airway in which the airliners descended from the south. Now without prior permission this would never have been possible but we had the permits and all the commercial traffic were routed around us while we were climbing to the drop altitude of 14000'. When I reached altitude I had about 30 minutes to kill before these poor saps were going to jump out of a perfectly functioning airplane, so I timed my run-in so that I would let them out at the exact time the announcer on the ground would direct the audience's attention skywards. I still had time to kill after that so, I decided to check where my service ceiling would be, I mean, while I was up there anyway. So I trimmed the Skylane's nose down and pulled up on the stick so that if I pass out, the plane would spontaneously drop its nose and I would recover. I remember that at 15300' I became euphoric and my status reports to approach control at Jan Smuts airport, as it was known back then, became more comical and the guy on the ground knew what I was doing as I was horsing around more and more over the radio. The last I remembered seeing was the alitimeter at 15600' and then I passed out. I came to when the Skylane roared through 15000' at which time the poor jumpers in the back also resurfaced and needless to say they were not impressed that I completely forgot about them. I will not repeat what I was called before they left. They jumped as scheduled and I never heard from them again (needless to say, their club never asked me again to fly for them! Go figure. Such ingratitude!) As a footnote: I did not realize that I had a slight cold and since there was no slow descend after the drop was made because of pressure from the airliners, I blocked up my Eustachian tubes so bad that a quack had to intervene. Anyway, that's my service ceiling at about -20C. Nico PS. Pity I cannot attend the fly-in. Next year, maybe? N. ----- Original Message ----- From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com> To: Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 7:01 PM Subject: rncp > > > I was'nt talking about their planes!!!!! AL > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: 400 hp AC-560F?
In a message dated 06/28/01 20:02:22 Pacific Daylight Time, tylorh(at)sound.net writes: > Hi Tylor, Yeah, I know Dick put his STC onto the 680 series and the Shrike. Never saw one go onto a 560F ... not that it couldn't. Just wondering if the STC was there, why it had never been done yet. Market pressure finally put the price point to where it made sense? The 500B conversion is actually the Merlyn conversion with the engine that was fit onto the Piper Navajo series, done by Hugh Evans in Washington. (Same guy doing the Orenda engine fit on the King Air 90.) Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: High Altitude Training, correction
In a message dated 06/28/01 20:19:53 Pacific Daylight Time, mdcmd@ms-online.com writes: > So does FAR 61.13 apply if the service ceiling is exactly 25,000? Milt, Nico and everyone. First, I apologize. I fell into someone else's lysdexia. It's FAR 61.31 ... not .13. I quote chapter and verse from the Big Book of Airplane Rules, 61.31: (g) Additional training required for operating pressurized aircraft capable of operating at high altitudes. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (g)(3) of this section, no person may act as pilot in command of a pressurized aircraft (an aircraft that has a service ceiling or maximum operating altitude, whichever is lower, above 25,000 feet MSL), unless that person has received and logged ground training from an authorized instructor and obtained an endorsement in the person's logbook or training record from an authorized instructor who certifies the person has satisfactorily accomplished the ground training. The ground training must include at least the following subjects: (i) High-altitude aerodynamics and meteorology; (ii) Respiration; (iii) Effects, symptoms, and causes of hypoxia and any other high-altitude sickness;(iv) Duration of consciousness without supplemental oxygen; (v) Effects of prolonged usage of supplemental oxygen; (vi) Causes and effects of gas expansion and gas bubble formation; (vii) Preventive measures for eliminating gas expansion, gas bubble formation, and high-altitude sickness; (viii) Physical phenomena and incidents of decompression; and(ix) Any other physiological aspects of high-altitude flight. (2) Except as provided in paragraph (g)(3) of this section, no person may act as pilot in command of a pressurized aircraft unless that person has received and logged training from an authorized instructor in a pressurized aircraft, or in a flight simulator or flight training device that is representative of a pressurized aircraft, and obtained an endorsement in the person's logbook or training record from an authorized instructor who found the person proficient in the operation of a pressurized aircraft. The flight training must include at least the following subjects: (i) Normal cruise flight operations while operating above 25,000 feet MSL; (ii) Proper emergency procedures for simulated rapid decompression without actually depressurizing the aircraft; and (iii) Emergency descent procedures.(3) The training and endorsement required by paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this section are not required if that person can document satisfactory accomplishment of any of the following in a pressurized aircraft, or in a flight simulator or flight training device that is representative of a pressurized aircraft: (i) Serving as pilot in command before April 15, 1991; (ii) Completing a pilot proficiency check for a pilot certificate or rating before April 15, 1991; (iii) Completing an official pilot-in-command check conducted by the military services of the United States; or(iv) Completing a pilot-in-command proficiency check under part 121, 125, or 135 of this chapter conducted by the Administrator or by an approved pilot check airman. Whew! OK, bottom line, if you fly OVER FL250, you're required to have the training stated above. Note: For a Commander to go above FL250, it must have a glass windshield; that did not appear in production until the 690A Turbo Commander. That's one of the big differences between the 690 and 690A -- Altitude capability. Hope that helps. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2001
From: AOPA ePilot Newsletter <aopa_news(at)aopa.org>
Subject: AOPA ePilot -- Vol. 3, Issue 26
AOPA ePilot--Vol. 3, Issue 26 Departments Inside AOPA On Capitol Hill Airport Support Network Quiz Me! 2001 Bonanza Sweepstakes ePilot Calendar Weekend Weather Officials suggest new site for Florida airport Bendix/King launches in-flight weather service Pilots land at all Oregon airports House members question technology approach Volume 3, Issue 26 June 29, 2001 GA News RUNWAY INCURSIONS GET NEW SCRUTINY A recent incident at Washington Reagan National Airport that was uncovered by The Washington Post has raised new concerns about runway incursions. In the May 14 event, a twin-engine Piper Aztec aircraft was forced to initiate heavy braking to avoid hitting a US Airways Boeing 737 that had begun its takeoff roll. The Post quoted the pilot, Ronald W. Zborowski of Eighty Four, Pennsylvania, as stating that an air traffic controller caught the error and tried to tell Zborowski to go around, but used the wrong call sign. Congress has begun hearings on runway incursions that include testimony by AOPA President Phil Boyer. See On Capitol Hill below. U.S. AEROBATIC TEAM DOES WELL IN WORLD COMPETITION The United States Aerobatic Team did well during competition at the World Air Games 2001 in southern Spain. Robert Armstrong won second place overall, and also won a bronze medal in the Freestyle category. David Martin captured the Freestyle gold. More than 5,000 air athletes and officials from 80 countries competed in the Olympic-style event. The team returns to Dover, Delaware, July 4. OFFICIALS SUGGEST NEW SITE FOR FLORIDA AIRPORT What's the best way to build a new general aviation airport in the Orlando, Florida, area? Pick a site that is outside that area. Airport supporters had hoped to establish a new airport in Orange County, home to Orlando and gateway to nationally popular attractions (see June 15 ePilot). Public controversy over proposed sites has now led the West Orange County Airport Authority to consider a new site in nearby Lake County. Lake County commissioners last week approved a study of a remote 300-acre site. Still under consideration are two of the more controversial sites in Orange County. BENDIX/KING LAUNCHES IN-FLIGHT WEATHER SERVICE The Bendix/King Datalink Weather service became operational on June 20 and will premier during EAA AirVenture 2001 in July. The service will provide free textual weather and subscription-based graphic weather to aircraft flying at 5,000 feet or higher anywhere in the United States. Equipment was developed under an FAA contract and uses VDL 2 (VHF datalink) equipment that transmits data nearly as fast as the average home computer. Honeywell, owner of the Bendix/King line, will begin taking orders in the next two months and will deliver receivers by the end of the year. The receivers will cost less than $5,000. For information call 877/712-2386 or 913/712-2613. PILOTS LAND AT ALL OREGON AIRPORTS Two pilots have visited all 96 public-use airports in Oregon in a single trip while simultaneously raising money for two charities. On June 19 and 20, Parker Johnstone of Redmond, Oregon, and Jim Murphy of Brookline, New Hampshire, piloted a Bonanza for nearly 33 hours over a 2,822-nm journey that covered the state. The duo raised more than $10,000 for their chosen charitiesthe Make-A-Wish Foundation and the American Diabetes Associationfrom pledges made by individuals based on the number of airports visited. SNOWBIRDS CANCEL SHOWS THROUGH JULY 21 The Canadian Snowbirds flight demonstration team has cancelled shows through July 21 following an accident in which two of the aircraft collided during formation flight. Shows are expected to resume in late July. In the accident, aircraft number 5 flown by Captain Warren Wright collided with aircraft No. 1 flown by the group commander, Major Bob Painchaud. The two Canadair CT-114 Tutor jets had separated from the formation to take photographs and were rejoining when the accident occurred. For more information, visit the Web site. For daily news updates, see AOPA Online. Inside AOPA AOPA CONTINUES TO FIGHT FOR MEIGS AOPA is working to protect general aviation operations as new initiatives to avoid delays at Chicago O'Hare International Airport are developed by the Chicago Delay Task Force. Chicago aviation officials insist that there will be little impact on GA from the Chicago O'Hare initiative and continue to argue that the closing of Meigs Field and the corresponding shift in operations to Midway (or other area airports) should not be considered in the discussions. However, AOPA disagrees and continues to question how shifting Meigs' 46,000 operations per year to other area airports cannot affect air traffic in airspace surrounding O'Hare. AOPA TO APPEAL RICHARDS-GEBAUR AIRPORT DECISION AOPA is researching legal issues to decide if it will ask for a rehearing on a court decision allowing the closure of Richards-Gebaur Airport in Kansas City, Missouri. After almost a year of deliberation, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Paul, Minnesota, ruled earlier this month that the FAA had acted properly in allowing Kansas City to close Richards-Gebaur Airport and convert it into a rail-truck freight center. AOPA filed a lawsuit last May challenging the FAA's authority to release Kansas City from its federal grant assurances and surplus property deed restrictions. For more information, see AOPA Online. AOPA AND OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA, LOCK HORNS AGAIN AOPA has fired another shot at the city of Oceanside, California. In April, city officials were considering plans to close the airport and redevelop the property. AOPA vehemently objected. Now, city officials are proposing draconian restrictions on the use of the airport. "It appears the city of Oceanside is attempting to regulate aircraft operations that are within the exclusive province of the federal government," AOPA wrote in a June 22 letter to Mayor Terry Johnson. "AOPA believes very strongly that the staff proposals on airport operational issues violate existing federal laws and constitute breach of contract with the federal government. AOPA strongly opposes these proposals." City officials want an airport curfew with no landings or takeoffs permitted between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. Runway lights couldn't be activated after 10 p.m., except for a "declared emergency." For more informa NO AD FOR DUAL-VACUUM SYSTEMS, FAA SAYS A recent highly publicized accident in Missouri involving a Cessna 335 has focused the FAA regulatory spotlight on potential deficiencies in aircraft equipped with dual vacuum systems. Late last year the FAA issued an airworthiness concern sheet (ACS) to AOPA and aircraft type clubs indicating that it was considering an AD mandating repetitive inspection and replacement of vacuum system components. In response to the ACS, AOPA and several aircraft type clubs opposed the proposed AD, pointing out that a simple preflight check at engine start-up could completely preclude the possibility of an undetected vacuum system failure. As a result of the comments received, the FAA opted out of an AD and instead issued a special airworthiness information bulletin recommending a simple preflight verification of the vacuum system's integrity. For more information, visit Changing your mailing or e-mail addresses? Click here to update. On Capitol Hill HOUSE MEMBERS QUESTION TECHNOLOGY APPROACH AOPA President Phil Boyer testified Tuesday at a House aviation subcommittee hearing focusing on runway incursions. Boyer told the subcommittee, "We're not against using technology, but simply using better paint for runway and taxiway lines and using better signage would go a long way towards reducing runway incursions." AOPA member Rep. Robin Hayes (R-N.C.) was particularly tough on technology advocate Ken Mead, DOT inspector general. "When it comes to incursions, the personal responsibility issue is oftentimes pushed aside," Hayes said. "It all comes back to basic training and education." Other House aviation subcommittee members were also skeptical that technology is the cure-all for runway incursions, including pilot Rep. Vernon Ehlers (R-Mich.), ranking member Rep. William Lipinski (D-Ill.), and Rep. John Baldacci (D-Maine). For more information, visit the Web. HOUSE PASSES TRANSPORTATION APPROPRIATIONS BILL The House of Representatives approved a fiscal year 2002 funding bill for the FAA that includes a number of recommendations made by AOPA. Overall, the legislation would provide the FAA with $13.3 billion for the FAA$690 million (5 percent) more than the fiscal year 2001 budget that was enactedand consistent with the funding levels required by the Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the Twenty-First Century (AIR-21). A number of AOPA recommendations also were adopted, including full funding of the flight service station modernization program; a requirement that the FAA disseminate the database of airport diagrams to manufacturers at no cost; that the notam transmission system be modernized; and, despite the change in administration, that language be included prohibiting the FAA from funding user fee studies. The Senate is expected to take up the legislation in early July. Airport Support Network VOLUNTEER OF THE WEEKTONY MARMIANI AOPA Airport Support Network volunteer Tony Marmiani coordinated the efforts of several pro-airport groups at the Lawrence Municipal Airport, Massachusetts (LWM), in support of a long-term lease of airport property for an industrial park, rather than an outright sale of the property. Marmiani started a letter-writing campaign and contacted AOPA so it could write the city council members, citing AOPA's strong support for the long-term lease option. Marmiani is also involved in the Lawrence Airport Educational Foundation that is informing the public about aviation and the airport's role in providing economic, educational, and recreational benefits to the Merrimack Valley. To learn more about the Airport Support Network, visit AOPA Online. Quiz Me! Heres a question asked by an AOPA member last week of our AOPA technical specialists. Test your knowledge. Question: Would you please give me the instructions on how to notify the FAA of my change of address? Answer: When a pilot moves or the permanent address changes, the FAA must be notified within 30 days. Otherwise, the pilot may not act as PIC (FAR 61.60). Send the FAA a letter including the pilot's name, date of birth, social security number and/or airman certificate number, new address, and signature of the airman. To receive a certificate that reflects the new address, a $2 fee must accompany the letter. For full details, including the appropriate FAA address, see AOPA Online. Got a technical question for AOPA specialists? Call 800/872-2672 or e-mail to inforequest(at)aopa.org. Send comments on our Quiz Me! questions to epilot(at)aopa.org. AOPA Sweepstakes Bonanza Update Your AOPA Sweepstakes Bonanza is in the paint shop at Murmer Aircraft Services, located on Houston Southwest Airport in Texas. It is all white at the moment, awaiting stripes and other accents. It should be completed and dried by next week. After that, the aircraft is off to Salina, Kansas, to complete the installation of a TKS ice protection system. Visit AOPA Online. On The Road To Expo SEE A PARADE OF PLANES PREVIEW Ever see an AOPA Parade of Planes? You can get an idea of how the parade will look on November 7 as it passes down the streets of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, from a video that has just been placed on AOPA Online. Click here and click on "Parade of Planes" on the left side of the screen. That will link to a video featuring AOPA President Phil Boyer. The video was made during a previous Expo as the AOPA Parade of Planes passed in the background. ePilot Calendar WEEKEND FLYING DESTINATIONS Tacoma, Washington. The Tacoma Freedom Fair Air Show takes place July 4 at Tacoma Narrows Airport (TIW). Call 253/761-9433 for event information. Battle Creek, Michigan. The Team U.S. Nationals and Battle Creek Air Show takes place July 4 through 8 at W.K. Kellogg Airport (BTL). Call 616/962-0592 for event information. Peterborough, Ontario, Canada. The Canadian Owners and Pilots Association Convention takes place July 6 through 8 at Peterborough Airport (CYPQ). Call 613/236-4901 for event information. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Wings Over Pittsburgh Air Show takes place July 7 and 8 at Pittsburgh International Airport (PIT). Call 412/474-8683 for event information, or visit the Web site. FLYING DESTINATIONS IN CALIFORNIA CRESCENT CITY, CALIFORNIA. Airport Day and Fly-In takes place July 4 at Crescent City Airport (CEC). Call 707/464-3110 for event information. LOMPOC. West Coast Cub Fly-In takes place July 6 through 8 at Lompoc Airport (LPC). Call 805/733-1914. CONCORD. An open house takes place July 7 at Buchanan Field (CCR). Call 510/733-4734 for event information. GRASS VALLEY. AirFest 2001 takes place July 7 at Nevada County Airport (O17). Call 530/273-1972 for event information. For more airport details, see AOPA's Airport Directory Online. For more events, see Aviation Calendar of Events ASF SAFETY SEMINARS The next AOPA ASF Safety Seminars are scheduled in Reno, Nevada, July 9; Sacramento, California, July 10; Santa Rosa, California, July 11; Oakland, California, July 12; and Salinas, California, July 13. See AOPA Online for more information. ASF FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR REFRESHER CLINICS (All clinics start at 7:30 a.m.) The next AOPA Air Safety Foundation Flight Instructor Refresher Clinics are scheduled in San Mateo, California; Portland, Maine; and Pittsburgh, July 14 and 15. For the Flight Instructor Refresher Clinic schedule, see AOPA Online. ASF PINCH-HITTER GROUND-SCHOOL COURSES (Pinch-Hitter courses start at 9:30 a.m.) The next Pinch-Hitter Ground School will take place July 22 in Jacksonville, Florida. For more Pinch-Hitter courses, see AOPA Online. For comments on calendar items or to make submissions, contact Julie S. Walker at julie.walker(at)aopa.org. Contacting ePilot Got news ? Contact ePilot at nate.ferguson(at)aopa.org. Due to the large volume of mail received, we regret that we are unable to individually answer all correspondence. Having difficulty using this service? Visit the ePilot Frequently Asked Questions now at AOPA Online or write to epilot(at)aopa.org. You are currently subscribed as NAME-NICO VAN NIEKERK eMail Address-NICO(at)CYBERSUPERSTORE.COM. Changing your mailing or e-mail addresses? Click here to update. To UNSUBSCRIBE: Click here Unsubscribe, then hit the "Send" button. Do not include a message. To SUBSCRIBE: visit http://www.aopa.org/members/epilot.html. AOPA, 421 Aviation Way, Frederick, MD 21701 Tel: 800/USA-AOPA or 301/695-2000 Copyright 2001. Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association. Advertisers ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: garyloff <n27kb(at)erols.com>
Subject: Anchorage
Just returned from a conference in Anchorage, Alaska hosted by the super people of Alaska Aeronautics. I would highly reommend going. The temperatures are in the mid 70's and there is lots of daylight. Places to see Denali National Park, Fairbanks, Seward, Homer are all worth while in addition to Anchorage. Anchorage has the largest sea plane base in the world and at 8:00 PM it's as busy as LAX as all the float planes return. If you fly yourself (SUMMER ONLY) use the GA field in Anchorage whose name escapes me at the moment. While we were there the was a meeting ot the "Short Winged Piper Association" . I met one intrepid couple whom flew their Tri Pacer from St Louis. If your going to fly into the interior get a mountain check out or better yet a guide. Be advised there are only twelve paved airports in the state and virtually no radar coverage outside the major cities. Now to the real point of this communication as we were driving out of Anchorage International I got a glimpse of two Commanders. Upon further inspection these two birds were sans engines and interiors. The airframes looked to be in good condition. One even had what appeared to be a relatively recent paint job from Downtown Airpark. The registration numbers are N6114X belongiing to Ram Air and the other had Aussie markings VH EPM of which I can find no record for. I'm going to continue my research with the possible goal of recovering these airplanes and restoring them before they head to the junk yard. If anyone has info on VH EPM let me know, I'd appreciate your help. I will keep you informed on my hopefully non Quixotic quest. I hope you all have a great fly in. Finally if anyone is attending the EAA fly in I will be there carrying the flag for Superunicom, stop by. GL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk <Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Anchorage
Hi! N6114X is serial 500B-924-9 registered to Ram Air Inc. VH-EPM is the former mark of N16578, serial 500U-1647-7 registered to Douglas A Burts (an owner of Ram Air Inc?). I believe he bought this one over four years ago, from Australia. Has a 'bubble' window, as it was used by the Australian Customs. Ram Air Inc also have registered to them: N999GB, serial 500U-1717-27 N17DL, serial 500S-1866-42 Hope this helps, Barry J Collman "garyloff" <n27kb@erols. To: "Twin Commander Flight Group" com> cc: 29/06/2001 Subject: Anchorage 11:29 1. Fill in the brief application 2. Receive approval decision within 30 seconds Just returned from a conference in Anchorage, Alaska hosted by the super people of Alaska Aeronautics. I would highly reommend going. The temperatures are in the mid 70's and there is lots of daylight. Places to see Denali National Park, Fairbanks, Seward, Homer are all worth while in addition to Anchorage. Anchorage has the largest sea plane base in the world and at 8:00 PM it's as busy as LAX as all the float planes return. If you fly yourself (SUMMER ONLY) use the GA field in Anchorage whose name escapes me at the moment. While we were there the was a meeting ot the "Short Winged Piper Association" . I met one intrepid couple whom flew their Tri Pacer from St Louis. If your going to fly into the interior get a mountain check out or better yet a guide. Be advised there are only twelve paved airports in the state and virtually no radar coverage outside the major cities. Now to the real point of this communication as we were driving out of Anchorage International I got a glimpse of two Commanders. Upon further inspection these two birds were sans engines and interiors. The airframes looked to be in good condition. One even had what appeared to be a relatively recent paint job from Downtown Airpark. The registration numbers are N6114X belongiing to Ram Air and the other had Aussie markings VH EPM of which I can find no record for. I'm going to continue my research with the possible goal of recovering these airplanes and restoring them before they head to the junk yard. If anyone has info on VH EPM let me know, I'd appreciate your help. I will keep you informed on my hopefully non Quixotic quest. I hope you all have a great fly in. Finally if anyone is attending the EAA fly in I will be there carrying the flag for Superunicom, stop by. GL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: garyloff <n27kb(at)erols.com>
Subject: Alaska conf
I should share with the rest of you some of the observations I took from the Alaska Conf on Technology. I'm paraphrasing the title but that is the gist of it. In addition to what we contributed with our gadjet/project with Galaxy Scientific the conf was devoated in large measure the Capstone Project and ADS-B and the reduction of accidents most notably CFIT. There were some very heavy hitters from FAA, NASA and other branches of govt. First UAT (UPS/Apollo) has the inside track when ADS-B comes to the rest of us. Most of the avionics manufacturers are buildiing the types of avionics that will work with it and whose architecture will be flexible/open. Unfortunetly the venerable King is going in a different direction at this time and it will probably cost those who invest in their equipment. ADS-B has been extremely successful in Alaska and is very cool stuff, it will come to the lower 48 sooner than later. If I had to give a recommendation it would be to shy away from King and go with Garmin, UAT. However King are no dummies and I'm sure/hope they will soon see the light. I had the good fortune through no fault of my own to go with the entire UAT package with two of their MFDs. The whole stackwith one MX 20 can be had for well under 20k. I would highly recommend two of the MX 20 and your still under or very close to 20k. If the avionics your considering don't have RS 232 interfaces and open architecture you will may be very sorry in the next 5 years. The FAA has backed way off the GPS only panel. If you have a Loran keep it. ILS and the like are going to be around for many years. Finally I saw one of the scariest airpoorts in the world. Juneau has to be seen to be believed. The tower almost sits lower than the runway the top of the tower is at eye level with the runway. Talk about pucker factor the missed approach gives me shivers. Gary ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: ALERT!
I think someone just sent a virus to the list as an executable attachment. I'm not sure what it is, but since it was an MS Outlook attachment, be aware that it is likely a virus. FYI, I HIGHLY recomend against using any of Microsoft's email products as they are full of security holes! Seems like a week never goes by without a warning that somebody has found a new fault in Outlook. Chris Schuermann ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: rncp
Hey Gang, Well ya'll are worse than I thought! there is an old saying that when you are drinking,you get higher than a Georgia Pine.When I said we would see what your service ceiling was, I was talking about your ability to handle the contents of the JUG! DUHHHH!! AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: Milt <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Re: Alaska conf
Anyone care to interpret all those abbreviations for us rednecks. Milt ----- Original Message ----- From: garyloff To: Twin Commander Flight Group Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 6:41 AM Subject: Alaska conf 1. Fill in the brief application 2. Receive approval decision within 30 seconds I should share with the rest of you some of the observations I took from the Alaska Conf on Technology. I'm paraphrasing the title but that is the gist of it. In addition to what we contributed with our gadjet/project with Galaxy Scientific the conf was devoated in large measure the Capstone Project and ADS-B and the reduction of accidents most notably CFIT. There were some very heavy hitters from FAA, NASA and other branches of govt. First UAT (UPS/Apollo) has the inside track when ADS-B comes to the rest of us. Most of the avionics manufacturers are buildiing the types of avionics that will work with it and whose architecture will be flexible/open. Unfortunetly the venerable King is going in a different direction at this time and it will probably cost those who invest in their equipment. ADS-B has been extremely successful in Alaska and is very cool stuff, it will come to the lower 48 sooner than later. If I had to give a recommendation it would be to shy away from King and go with Garmin, UAT. However King are no dummies and I'm sure/hope they will soon see the light. I had the good fortune through no fault of my own to go with the entire UAT package with two of their MFDs. The whole stackwith one MX 20 can be had for well under 20k. I would highly recommend two of the MX 20 and your still under or very close to 20k. If the avionics your considering don't have RS 232 interfaces and open architecture you will may be very sorry in the next 5 years. The FAA has backed way off the GPS only panel. If you have a Loran keep it. ILS and the like are going to be around for many years. Finally I saw one of the scariest airpoorts in the world. Juneau has to be seen to be believed. The tower almost sits lower than the runway the top of the tower is at eye level with the runway. Talk about pucker factor the missed approach gives me shivers. Gary ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: Milt <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: virus
Dont know if we are all getting paranoid about a virus but my zone alarm and virus scan quarantined and suggested I not open an attachment labeled unaxa attached to Luis Panacchi's e mail 6/29 Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Anchorage
In a message dated 06/29/01 03:32:38 Pacific Daylight Time, n27kb(at)erols.com writes: > If you fly yourself (SUMMER ONLY) use the GA field in Anchorage whose name > Merrill Field is the GA airport at Anchorage. Busy place! The name escapes me right now, but there is/was at least one "fleet" operator in Alaska. Also, Tom Blaesing, owner of Commanders Northwest, has traditionally had several Commanders on Forest Service contracts based up there. Wing Commander Gordon Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Alaska conf
In a message dated 06/29/01 04:44:37 Pacific Daylight Time, n27kb(at)erols.com writes: > Finally I saw one of the scariest airpoorts in the world. Juneau has to be > seen to be believed. The tower almost sits lower than the runway the top of > the tower is at eye level with the runway. Talk about pucker factor the > That's good ... but try this out: Kodiak, Alaska. The approach plate has the statement "missed approach N/A." You do the ILS and get an automatic GCA (or PAR if you prefer) back up, whether you ask for it or not. Why? The ILS brings you to a runway with the shear vertical wall of granite mountain near the other end. First time I was in there and broke out and I saw what I was facing I was more than grateful for the GCA back-up! And on the North Slope ... well, there's a certain charm to shooting an ILS to a dirt runway. Thanks for the field report on ADS-B. Very interesting and I think members who are doing panel upgrades are well advised to talk to you first. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: Furlong5(at)aol.com <Furlong5(at)aol.com>
Subject: The Fun part of Aviation
In a message dated 6/29/2001 8:09:06 AM Pacific Daylight Time, somewhereoutwest(at)home.com writes: > > Another good reason to check around before you kick the tires and fly!! > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: Milt Concannon <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Flyin routing
Looks like my last stop before HIO will be Salt Lake City. Is there any preferred or best route across the mountains. Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: Furlong5(at)aol.com <Furlong5(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Flyin routing
In a message dated 6/29/2001 8:35:15 AM Pacific Daylight Time, mdcmd@ms-online.com writes: > Looks like my last stop before HIO will be Salt Lake City. > Is there any preferred or best route across the mountains. > > Milt > If I were going to make that leg I would go to Boise then V500 -Jepp IFR Planning chart -to Newberg VOR which is just a couple of miles south of HIO ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Flyin routing
In a message dated 6/29/01 8:34:57 AM Pacific Daylight Time, mdcmd@ms-online.com writes: << Is there any preferred or best route across the mountains >> High Milt, fly very High!! see ya there jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: The Fun part of Aviation
I don't do wingdings, or other like codes! :) Attachment was all *$# %'d up... Barry ----- Original Message ----- From: Furlong5(at)aol.com To: tcfg(at)listbot.com Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 8:27 AM Subject: Fwd: The Fun part of Aviation In a message dated 6/29/2001 8:09:06 AM Pacific Daylight Time, somewhereoutwest(at)home.com writes: Another good reason to check around before you kick the tires and fly!! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: preflight
Gang, Just thought I'd share my experience today that could/would have ended up very ugly were it not for a thorough preflight. I've been doing my ME training in a Piper Seminole. The flight school (Sunrise Aviation) is very reputable and takes good care of their aircraft. That said, they rent airplanes and train students...stuff breaks. Today was the day of my checkride. After passing the ground portion , the DE told me to go out and preflight the airplane...he'd be right there. Out to the airplane I go.... After completing the cockpit part of the preflight, I began the walk around. Everything was normal: right flap, right aileron, right wing lights, gear, gear door, fuel, oil, fuel pump line, landing light (in nose), front gear, right front gear door, left...front...gear.....what's that? That's not supposed to be hanging down there! the left gear door is free on it's hinge! The attach bracket for the gear door link arm had sheared clean off. The link arm was haning down and the gear door was free to do as it pleased. A takeoff in this situation would have, at the very least, been very expensive! After talking to the mech. he stated that he had seen this condition before where the pilot took off and the wind pushed the door closed ahead of the gear, JAMMING the nosewheel in place - half way up. Two engines, props, nosewheel, and sheetmetal later, the plane was flying again. I share this not to boast of my wonderful preflight inspection, rather that I am fortunate to have caught the problem. It would have been very easy to overlook. Especially in the Seminole, or Commander where the plane sits low to the ground. Another reminder to take this flying s**t seriously.... Y'all be safe out there! Barry Hancock Precision Flight Networks (949) 300-5510 bdogltd(at)pacbell.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: preflight
In a message dated 06/29/01 10:56:00 Pacific Daylight Time, bdogltd(at)pacbell.net writes: > I share this not to boast of my wonderful preflight inspection, rather that > I am fortunate to have caught the problem. It would have been very easy to > overlook. Especially in the Seminole, or Commander where the plane sits > Good catch! Go ahead and boast about a wonderful preflight inspection -- you deserve it! Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: Milt <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Update on earlier topic 6 place long range aircraft
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay Remember pilots for Christ Just got this e mail From H. James mcConell thought some of yall might be interesred Milt ----- Original Message ----- From: H. James McConnell To: Milt Concannon Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 5:18 PM Subject: Re: 6 place long range aircraft Milt: Sometimes you will never know how the Lord will work things out but it is always better than we can do for ourselves. You will remember our emails re: Jerry Ferrells 560. I had several phone conversations with him and sent him the latest copy of our newsletter which included our most recent non-ambulatory mercy flight. I also gave him a copy of our video about Pilots for Christ which had a sequence where we transported a paralyzed child from Arkansas to New York. On June 14th, while on a flight viewing other TC's I stopped off at Temple and looked at the aircraft and met Jerry. He sat me down in his hanger and asked me "If I give you this aircraft, what will you do with it?" I described the missions that we could not do with our Seneca that we could with his aircraft because of the high load capability and greater range. He said, "If you can get me an appraisal for at least $70,000, I will give you the aircraft! The aircraft appraised at $70.500. The appraiser refused to accept payment because it was the Lord's work. The attorney helping me draw up the legal papers refused payment and a local IP is training our multiengine pilots in the 560 without pay. We returned from Temple last evening with the aircraft and it flew great. Needs a few small repairs and upgrades but is basically ready to fly missions. PTL! I appreciate the part you played in all this. Without your referral, we would not have known about the aircraft or Mr. Ferrell's possible gifting of it. Thanks for all you have done, Milt. I hope that you feel a little of the joy of the Lord's blessing that we do having received an aircraft that greatly enlarges the mission of Pilots for Christ. In His Service. Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: Milt Concannon To: H. James McConnell Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 12:53 PM Subject: Re: 6 place long range aircraft James attached are some items off the internet I would seriously look at the one owned by jerry ferrel in TX. He owns a beer distributorship and may be more interested in a writeoff its a really great plane. Jerry Ferrell Home 254 778 3176 Work 254 773 3336 Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: The Fun part of Aviation
That was a virus, Barry. I had two that my Norton picked up and killed before it could do any harm. Don't open their attachments. If you deleted them, you also have to go to your 'deleted items' folder and kill it there too. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: Barry Hancock To: Furlong5(at)aol.com ; tcfg(at)listbot.com Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 10:35 AM Subject: Re: The Fun part of Aviation I don't do wingdings, or other like codes! :) Attachment was all *$# %'d up... Barry ----- Original Message ----- From: Furlong5(at)aol.com To: tcfg(at)listbot.com Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 8:27 AM Subject: Fwd: The Fun part of Aviation In a message dated 6/29/2001 8:09:06 AM Pacific Daylight Time, somewhereoutwest(at)home.com writes: Another good reason to check around before you kick the tires and fly!! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: The Fun part of Aviation
Nico, Thanks! I opened the attachment, not thinking. Scary that these things are getting on group BB's now. I've come out of the dark ages and subscribed to McAfee now.... Barry ----- Original Message ----- From: Nico van Niekerk To: Barry Hancock ; Furlong5(at)aol.com ; tcfg(at)listbot.com Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 3:29 PM Subject: Re: The Fun part of Aviation That was a virus, Barry. I had two that my Norton picked up and killed before it could do any harm. Don't open their attachments. If you deleted them, you also have to go to your 'deleted items' folder and kill it there too. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: Barry Hancock To: Furlong5(at)aol.com ; tcfg(at)listbot.com Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 10:35 AM Subject: Re: The Fun part of Aviation I don't do wingdings, or other like codes! :) Attachment was all *$# %'d up... Barry ----- Original Message ----- From: Furlong5(at)aol.com To: tcfg(at)listbot.com Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 8:27 AM Subject: Fwd: The Fun part of Aviation In a message dated 6/29/2001 8:09:06 AM Pacific Daylight Time, somewhereoutwest(at)home.com writes: Another good reason to check around before you kick the tires and fly!! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: preflight
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay WAY TO GO BARRY!.................jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: preflight
Looks like Barry found-----------THE WEAKEST LINK!!!!!!!! AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: res00rbl <res00rbl(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Advertisements
Hi Guys I landed a hand full of old Flying magazine ads. Id be happy to share them with anyone interested they run from 520s to the jets. I can either e-mail them as attachments, as long as your server can handle multi-attachments, or I will send photocopies via snail mail. I also have three pilot reviews from magazines the reviews are on a 500, 500B & 500U (Shrike). Please contact me if you would enjoy reading one of them. All I ask is a couple of bucks for the postage & copying. Take Care Jim Jorgensen (Seattle) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: ANOTHER nice flight
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay HI KIDS.............. Had a great ride to work today. Almost "sever clear" but had some build ups along the way. Tops right at cursing alt, 6500. What a blast. Diving through the cloud valleys and blasting up the sides of the canyons!! Lots of "trails" to follow then pull up at the last minute at the end of the box canyon, roll hard left (59degrees), float over the top and dive back into the next one!! I had the Iguanas complete and undivided attention!! When I landed a guy came out to meet the airplane. He flies for Boeing Corporate (came over from MD when Boeing bought them out). Seems his dad and he sold Commanders in the early 60s. His favorite was the 500A with the IO-470s. They had one for there "driver" . He went on to fly lots of other stuff but said the Commanders are the best. He may join the list, I hope he does. He has some original Commander memorabilia and the factory key fob for a 500B, N6168X of something like that. Anyway, fun to talk to him. Amazing how many guys got there start in a commander, we are in good company. Tomorrow I will fly a Biplane ride for Jim Matheson and his yacht club from a place called "Quarter Master" harbor, should be fun. Yall have a great weekend. capt jimbob ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: res00rbl <res00rbl(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: ANOTHER nice flight
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay Sounds like you're having way too much fun, Jimbo! Keep at it - the weather may/will change up here, you know (haha) - Jimbo -----Original Message----- From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com [mailto:YOURTCFG(at)aol.com] Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 5:57 PM To: tcfg(at)listbot.com Subject: ANOTHER nice flight Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay HI KIDS.............. Had a great ride to work today. Almost "sever clear" but had some build ups along the way. Tops right at cursing alt, 6500. What a blast. Diving through the cloud valleys and blasting up the sides of the canyons!! Lots of "trails" to follow then pull up at the last minute at the end of the box canyon, roll hard left (59degrees), float over the top and dive back into the next one!! I had the Iguanas complete and undivided attention!! When I landed a guy came out to meet the airplane. He flies for Boeing Corporate (came over from MD when Boeing bought them out). Seems his dad and he sold Commanders in the early 60s. His favorite was the 500A with the IO-470s. They had one for there "driver" . He went on to fly lots of other stuff but said the Commanders are the best. He may join the list, I hope he does. He has some original Commander memorabilia and the factory key fob for a 500B, N6168X of something like that. Anyway, fun to talk to him. Amazing how many guys got there start in a commander, we are in good company. Tomorrow I will fly a Biplane ride for Jim Matheson and his yacht club from a place called "Quarter Master" harbor, should be fun. Yall have a great weekend. capt jimbob ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: preflight
Don't know 'bout that. *I* was the PIC... :) Barry > Looks like Barry found-----------THE WEAKEST LINK!!!!!!!! AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: preflight
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay Okay, so everyone will get the PUN, the WEAKEST LINK-AGE! AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 30, 2001
From: res00rbl <res00rbl(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Ads To You
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay Hi just wanted to let you know that Im gone this whole week, so I will forward any requests the week of the 9th. Have a great, great day of celebrating the founding of the greatest nation ever! Jim Jorgensen ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 30, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Mr. RPM 560F? It's true!
It's true! I just got off the phone with Mr. RPM himself. The first AC-560-F with a Mr. RPM installation actually began a year and a half ago. Since the 560F is the same type certificate as the 680 series and the 500S, it was always a possibilty but was never done before. Dick MacCoon says Banyan Aero in Ft. Lauderdale is doing great work and he is really impressed with them. The airframe is zero-timed, by the way. Noteworthy is that Mr. RPM has moved the oil cooler to the back of the nacelle and is using all stainless hardware. It seems there has been some trouble with one particular key person in the certification process on site and the paperwork is dragging and the cost is going up. Dick says that the price should be around $350K but the current one is way over that due to some of the factors he mentioned above. "$350K is not cheap, but put side by side with the Mr. RPM airplanes on the market and the Merlyn conversions, it's not out of line," he points out. On another topic, Mr. RPM is finishing up the updated turbo charging package for the 500B and S Commanders. He thinks it will be ready to sell in 6 months. Sounds like a good package; lots of refinements from the original turbochargers on the 500 series. I know Tylor Hall will have the scoop on that when it's ready for market as he's keeping his eye on the program. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 2001
From: D Monk <britmonk(at)swbell.net>
Subject: [Is this for real?]
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 2001
From: D Monk <britmonk(at)swbell.net>
Subject: [Is this for real?]
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Re: [Is this for real?] NO - IGNORE IT
D Monk wrote: > Subject: Fwd: Is this for real? > Federal Bill 602P adds 5-cents per > E-mail sent. This is an ancient "sucker email" that's been making the rounds on the internet for years. Ignore it - it's totally bogus... There are tons of these types of emails floating around including the ever-popular virus scares. If you think you have something thats "big news(tm)" to share, make sure to check to see if it's accurate before posting to the chatlist. For news such as this one, I suggest looking at CNN - it would be on TV. For virus scares, go to the web site: http://www.cert.org If it is a real virus, full details will be there as well as instructions on how to deal with it. Cheers! Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 2001
From: garyloff <n27kb(at)erols.com>
Subject: Re: [Is this for real?] NO - IGNORE IT
I didn't read the attachment as I never open anything from a unknown source. I will relate my most recent commercial flying experiance. First I guess it's a given that commercial flying sucks but by going on line I was able to get first class tickets to Anchorage for less than many of the coach fares. Another personal discovery. In the DC area we have 3 major airports Washington National-DCA. Dulles IAD and Baltimore-BWI. Even though IAD and BWI are equi distant from my home the same airline will charge you far more to fly from IAD than BWI. If you have a second tier city like Baltimore located near you next time you are forced to endure commercial flying check out the airfares from there too. G ----- Original Message ----- From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com> To: D Monk Cc: Amazon.com ; Amy Morris ; Andy Arena ; Barb Farrell ; Bill McGinnis ; Cheap Tickets Insider Specials ; Chris Schuermann ; Curtis Vickery ; Daniel P. Raymer ; Dave McGhee ; Frank Chambers ; Frank Dixon ; Gert Lundgren ; Heather Lightfoot ; Jerry Crim ; Jerry Owsley ; Jim Hand ; John & Babs ; Judy Boyd ; Kerry Thompson ; Lee Harpe ; Lisa Bacon ; Mac Swindell > > D Monk wrote: > > Subject: Fwd: Is this for real? > > Federal Bill 602P adds 5-cents per > > E-mail sent. > > > This is an ancient "sucker email" that's been making the rounds > on the internet for years. Ignore it - it's totally bogus... > There are tons of these types of emails floating around including > the ever-popular virus scares. If you think you have something > thats "big news(tm)" to share, make sure to check to see if it's > accurate before posting to the chatlist. For news such as this > one, I suggest looking at CNN - it would be on TV. For virus > scares, go to the web site: http://www.cert.org If it is a real > virus, full details will be there as well as instructions on how > to deal with it. > > Cheers! > Chris > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 2001
From: Mark Burson <info(at)reaganfoundation.org>
Subject: What the 4th of July means to Ronald Reagan- And should
mean to us Dear Nico, Tomorrow, we celebrate the 225th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Many of you are aware that July 4th has always been Ronald Reagan's favorite holiday. To celebrate this important day and to pay tribute to a holiday that was a source of continuing inspiration to President Reagan, I offer the following: What The Fourth of July Means to Ronald Reagan-And Should Mean To All of Us By Mark Burson Twenty years ago this week, Parade Magazine invited President Reagan to write a special July 4th message to the nation, to be printed and published nationwide. The result was an extraordinary essay that prominently featured his personal reflection and historical understanding-as well his unique brand of patriotic appreciation. In this observation, any reader would surely not be surprised by Ronald Reagan's heartfelt regard for the stalwart men who chartered our nation. But first allow me to briefly describe a part of the article that appeared at its beginning and that struck me as particularly important. It is a disclaimer of sorts, from the magazine, and it details a letter from one of the President's assistants. The cover note to Parade's readers stated, "This 4th of July message is the President's own words and written initially in his own hand. I thought your readers might like to know that, and that he wrote it on a yellow pad at Camp David the week before last." To some this note might have suspiciously smacked of political posturing, the surgical handiwork of a clever spin-doctor trying to sell the public on an elected official's authenticity. With Ronald Reagan, however, has there ever been any mistaking that he is the genuine article? Even more fortunately, with the recent publication of Reagan In His Own Hand, a collection of the radio commentaries he delivered between 1975 and 1979, we have come to know the 40th President as the quintessential thinking-and writing man. This is because Reagan In His Own Hand includes many priceless reproductions of the man's own handwritten drafts, composed in his own handwriting, on a yellow pad-just as President Reagan wished to impart to the nation what its birthday means to him. Often, we look upon July 4th as a relaxing holiday from work, more akin to backyard barbecues and flaring fireworks than personal sacrifice and hardships endured. Ronald Reagan himself remarked about how the town in which he grew up came colorfully alive with the onset of July, and that, for him, the 4th was almost as long-anticipated as Christmas. Who can frown upon that sense of joy? But his words then took into careful consideration a developing sense of national identity and recognition of America's special start: "Somewhere in our growing up, we began to be aware of the meaning of the day, and with the awareness came the birth of our patriotism." In recounting the remarkable event that took place now 225 years ago in that little hall in Philadelphia where the Declaration of Independence was signed, how often do we stop to think of the risk its signers took, instead of the reward that we enjoy today? Ronald Reagan made sure that we did, not to remind us of sad things or personal misfortune, but to pay appropriate tribute to the remarkable men we have come to know simply as the Founding Fathers. He made certain we would understand that signing the document was "an irretrievable act, and that the walls resounded with the words-treason, the gallows, the headsman's axe-and the issue remained in doubt." This vivid writing recognized not only the glory of victory, but of the men, signers all, who risked all and surrendered all to, as he put it, "sire a nation that grew from sea to shining sea." In this way, Ronald Reagan called us to our destiny, to consider anew that July 4th is "more than just the birthday of a nation. It also commemorates the only true philosophical revolution in all history. There have been revolutions before and since ours. But those revolutions exchanged one set of rules for another. Ours was a revolution that changed the very concept of government." Has anyone ever captured-more succinctly and more inclusively -the inspiration that created the American experiment and gave life to the ideals we claim as birthright? President Reagan concluded with a thoughtful comment, not delivered as demanding edict, but as solemn hope: "We sometimes forget that great truth and we never should." From that yellow pad of paper sprang a true homage to the 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence, and it could only have been written by a man for whom patriotism, love of country and an appreciation for how we got here were never far from his heart. Thank you, Mr. President. And to everyone: Happy Fourth of July. SPECIAL OFFER: Recently, you may have heard about the release of our highly acclaimed new book, Ronald Reagan: An American Hero. The handsome, leather bound version is available exclusively at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Museum Store. If you order this collector's item this month, we will also send you a copy of Stand-Up Reagan, a 40-minute video (value $12.95) that celebrates the wit, warmth and humor of President Reagan. Just click here to order the leather bound version of Ronald Reagan: An American Hero, and when we fulfill your order, we will include a copy of Stand-Up Reagan. You may also go to: http://www.reaganfoundation.org/store online store Thank you for your support. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 2001
From: Mark Burson <info(at)reaganfoundation.org>
Subject: Correction.
Dear Nico, Regarding the offer in my first e-mail, I would like to provide a direct link to the leather bound version of Ronald Reagan: An American Hero if you are interested in learning more. http://www.reaganfoundation.org/store/products.asp?subcat_id=39 Direct Link Thank you again for your support. Mark Burson Executive Director Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Foundation 40 Presidential Drive Simi Valley, CA 93065 805-522-2977 http://www.reaganfoundation.org/ mburson(at)reaganfoundation.org ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 2001
From: TILLMAN333(at)aol.com <TILLMAN333(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: times are a' changing
Freedom? When was the last time you spent an evening with your bride discussing the purchase of a Fuji Commander 700 at a sushi bar after viewing the movie Pearl Harbor, sipping on a bottle of Socki? (red neck moonshine) Brewed at the foot of Taylor's Ridge. Fly Safe GT Ps. Any 700 pilots out there? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: times are a' changing
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay AUE THO GADY............jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: times are a' changing
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay Forgive my ignorance, but what is a Fuji Commander? Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: <TILLMAN333(at)aol.com> To: ; Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 7:40 PM Subject: Re: times are a' changing > > > Freedom? > When was the last time you spent an evening with your bride discussing the > purchase of a Fuji Commander 700 at a sushi bar after viewing the movie Pearl > Harbor, sipping on a bottle of Socki? (red neck moonshine) > Brewed at the foot of Taylor's Ridge. > Fly Safe > GT > Ps. Any 700 pilots out there? > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <thall5(at)kc.rr.com>
Subject: Fuji Commander 700
Nico, In 1978, 79,80, Then Rockwell Commander made a deal with Fuji of Japan to market a new commander built by Fuji, finished in US aircraft. It is a low wing, pressurized 5.5 psi, twin along the lines of a Navajo. Pointy Nose. Powered by two Lyc TIO-540-R2AD, 340 HP engines. It was not a hot seller and only 32 were sold in three years. Some lawyer decided that the unsold units were to be destroyed after removing the engines and avionics. Then they drove a steam roller over the airframes. They are reported to fly well, but were no improvements in performance over older Twin Commanders. The 500 S went out of production in 1979. The 690 was doing well, and the 685 stopped in 1974. I am pulling most of this off the top of my head. I am sure that Sir Berry can fill in some more details. There is a company locally that flies one. I have a photo of one. Where is the History of Commanders paper that Morris and Leff and a few others wrote some time ago? Wing Commander Gordon- Do you have a copy? Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <thall5(at)kc.rr.com>
Subject: Fuji Commander 700
Nico, In 1978, 79,80, Then Rockwell Commander made a deal with Fuji of Japan to market a new commander built by Fuji, finished in US aircraft. It is a low wing, pressurized 5.5 psi, twin along the lines of a Navajo. Pointy Nose. Powered by two Lyc TIO-540-R2AD, 340 HP engines. It was not a hot seller and only 32 were sold in three years. Some lawyer decided that the unsold units were to be destroyed after removing the engines and avionics. Then they drove a steam roller over the airframes. They are reported to fly well, but were no improvements in performance over older Twin Commanders. The 500 S went out of production in 1979. The 690 was doing well, and the 685 stopped in 1974. I am pulling most of this off the top of my head. I am sure that Sir Berry can fill in some more details. There is a company locally that flies one. I have a photo of one. Where is the History of Commanders paper that Morris and Leff and a few others wrote some time ago? Wing Commander Gordon- Do you have a copy? Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: rncp
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay You can not fly a Fuji 700 upside down,bown to have crackup!!!! AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: HAPPY 4TH!!!!!
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay HI KIDS............ I just wanted to wish everybody a happy 4th and I hope all of you have a safe and fun holiday (I will be working flying the biplane all week) Remember all those who gave their lives so we can enjoy our freedom. See Ya jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 2001
From: JETPAUL(at)aol.com <JETPAUL(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: HAPPY 4TH!!!!!
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay Amen JB!!!!! Do not let this day go by without a prayer for all those who have fallen in the defense of freedom where ever they were called upon to fight. And remember, if you are still savin' yo' confederate money so you will be rich again one day...........YOU MIGHT BE A RNCP!!!!!! Paul Reason ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 2001
From: w.bow <w.bow(at)att.net>
Subject: The 4 letter word, SUMP
Well our sump ordeal is finally over for a while at least. Many of you remember when it started. I hope it is more peaceful that the last time I brought it up. It all started when I took the 500A over to Titusville(X21),FL to Crazy, Uncle, Dirty Harry M. for an "O" ring job on the sump drain. This small task exploded into the "SUMP FROM HELL" when the valve was being tightened back into the sump and the female part(I think that's still politically correct) of the sump cracked. Harry said "#$% &*(*& %$" I think that meant "OH MY". I went home laughing, hoping to find a quiet place to go cry. There wasn't time I had to go to work for 3 weeks and left the sump dumped on Harry, Scott and Roger. Harry and Co. pulled the old sump out and a decision was made to try to get another from Yoda. He sent one he had down and while it was being cleaned up 3 cracks were discovered. Work was halted until I could get back and "finger" things out. We decided to send the sump to SNH Aerospace in San Antonio. SNH found 3 more cracks for a total of 6. Repairs were $600.00 and turn time was 5 days which they stuck to. Within a couple of days it was all back together and leaking nicely down the left side of the airplane. "Oh didn't I tell you I never fill it to the top." That little mistake cost me plenty $$$ but Harry, Scott and Roger got lots of good practice removing and reinstalling sumps and fuel cells. I'm glad I was able to be a part of the educational process. Scott was the winner of the timed event with Dirty and Roger tying for first place in the #$% &*( event. What a team. They are a good group. If you "Left Coast Dudes" ever get to the Right Coast and are neat X21 you should at least stop in for a Diet Coke or a Cold Beer. Harry also give tutoring in English, My kids have a new understanding of how the English language is spoken. For the ladies in the group, they can stop off for some amazing "Butt Cleavage" I won't say who though. THE END FOR NOW bilbo ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 2001
From: John Vormbaum <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: Fuji Commander 700
Nico, I have a copy of the History of Commanders paper that Morris gave me not 90 days ago....I can probably scan it & get it to Chris, and if it's small enough, put it up on the website. Chris....any thoughts? /John ----- Original Message ----- From: Tylor Hall To: TCFG ; Nico van Niekerk Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 5:29 AM Subject: Fuji Commander 700 Nico, In 1978, 79,80, Then Rockwell Commander made a deal with Fuji of Japan to market a new commander built by Fuji, finished in US aircraft. It is a low wing, pressurized 5.5 psi, twin along the lines of a Navajo. Pointy Nose. Powered by two Lyc TIO-540-R2AD, 340 HP engines. It was not a hot seller and only 32 were sold in three years. Some lawyer decided that the unsold units were to be destroyed after removing the engines and avionics. Then they drove a steam roller over the airframes. They are reported to fly well, but were no improvements in performance over older Twin Commanders. The 500 S went out of production in 1979. The 690 was doing well, and the 685 stopped in 1974. I am pulling most of this off the top of my head. I am sure that Sir Berry can fill in some more details. There is a company locally that flies one. I have a photo of one. Where is the History of Commanders paper that Morris and Leff and a few others wrote some time ago? Wing Commander Gordon- Do you have a copy? Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 2001
From: Michrandi(at)aol.com <Michrandi(at)aol.com>
Subject: Rockwell Commander 700
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay Taylor, Here is some information: seats 6 Top 254 mph Gross wt. 6947 Cruise 244 mph Empty wt. 4704 Stall 79 mph Fuel cap. 210 Int. Climb 1578 (2)340-hp turbo Lyc. Ceiling 25,000 Range 1,214 T.O. (50) 2,264 Lnd. Dist.(50) 2,154 The press. 700 was designed and produced under an agreement between Fuji and Rockwell. The 700 was to be the first in a series of wide-bodied aircraft between the two companies. The 700 provides sea-level comfort up to 12,500 with a useful load of 2,283 pounds. Rockwell and Fuji ended there contract in December 1979. Happy 4th, Mike Macosko (wannabe 560F owner) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Fuji Commander 700
In a message dated 07/04/01 05:28:47 Pacific Daylight Time, thall5(at)kc.rr.com writes: > Where is the History of Commanders paper that Morris and Leff and a few > others wrote some time ago? Uhhhh. Ummmmmm. Well, I hate to say this, but I wrote the History of the Aero Commander. It was with Morris Kernick's help and I thank him for the initial input. I self published (not a sophisticated deal, it was desk-top published and cranked out by Kinko's) and Dick Wartinger has been my exclusive distributor since around 1993 or 1994. As far as your report on the Commander 700, you were quite good -- except you oversated how well they flew after being run over by a steam roller. I quote: "Some lawyer decided that the unsold units were to be destroyed after removing the engines and avionics. Then they drove a steam roller over the airframes.They are reported to fly well, but were no improvements in performance over older Twin Commanders." The never really flew that well, before or after. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: rncp
If you think that an armadillo as POSSUM ON THE HALF SHELL,you might be a RED NECKED COMMANDER PILOT! AL So here is the latest.The wife is going to perform a MRI And an EEG on me next week,so it looks like that after I do my check ride(in the very near future)Imay be going under the knife.If,and it looks enevitable,this happens Lucille will be on the market.If you fellows know of anyone interested in her just give me a shout. Thanks Allen ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <thall5(at)kc.rr.com>
Subject: History of Commanders
Wing Commander, Since I do not own a copy of your History, I did not know who wrote it. How much do you charge for your work to TCFG members???? Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: Fuji Commander 700
It remains a shame that they were destroyed though, don't you think? I mean if Apache's and other dubious craft could remain aloft and intact, who is this guy to decide to destroy them? I guess he must've owned them or else he would have been locked up. Any chance of getting a copy of the history? I would certainly pay to get a copy, especially if it is signed by the author. :-) Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com To: thall5(at)kc.rr.com Cc: tcfg(at)listbot.com Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 7:05 PM Subject: Re: Fuji Commander 700 In a message dated 07/04/01 05:28:47 Pacific Daylight Time, thall5(at)kc.rr.com writes: Where is the History of Commanders paper that Morris and Leff and a few others wrote some time ago? Wing Commander Gordon- Do you have a copy? Uhhhh. Ummmmmm. Well, I hate to say this, but I wrote the History of the Aero Commander. It was with Morris Kernick's help and I thank him for the initial input. I self published (not a sophisticated deal, it was desk-top published and cranked out by Kinko's) and Dick Wartinger has been my exclusive distributor since around 1993 or 1994. As far as your report on the Commander 700, you were quite good -- except you oversated how well they flew after being run over by a steam roller. I quote: "Some lawyer decided that the unsold units were to be destroyed after removing the engines and avionics. Then they drove a steam roller over the airframes.They are reported to fly well, but were no improvements in performance over older Twin Commanders." The never really flew that well, before or after. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: History of Commanders
In a message dated 07/04/01 20:51:53 Pacific Daylight Time, thall5(at)kc.rr.com writes: > Wing Commander, > Since I do not own a copy of your History, I did not know who wrote it. > How much do you charge for your work to TCFG members???? > Son, if you have to ask, you can't afford it. Seriously, Dick Wartinger was a gentleman enough to actually buy the History book from me years and years ago, to give away to prospective customers. It's an advertising cost for him and he pays me what amounts to an honorarium plus printing and shipping cost. In turn, I honor him and let him distribute the booklets. It should be said that every now and then I look at the work and cringe because there have been many changes since I first put it out and the booklet itself was done on the very best 300 dpi scanners and printers that existed at the time. What a long way we've come. Sir Barry and I talk about a revised edition, adding his excellent research and all new photos. I intend to add more about Ted Smith, as I have since come up with some great biographical material on him. When will this happen? I don't know. But as a very small consolation prize, I am going to post a Word document to the website that is a table that I created a long time ago on the piston models. Someone asked me about it a while back and it kind of slipped through my fingers, or mind, or whatever. Chris will let us know when it's ready to view at the website. Oh - I don't think there's any AC-700 details on it. Sorry. I'll immediately go to a Sushi bar and eat some slimy, squiggly, wiggly, icky stuff as a penance. Mike Macosko and Dennis Polito will see to it. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: rncp
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay Hey Gang, Thanks for the words of support! Not sick,just had the ole back broken in eight places in 1977 and the nerves are coming into contact with some bone spurs and fragments.Should'nt be anything major but just incase I hoped you guys will help me find her a home with someone who would treat her like the Lady she is! Thanks again AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 2001
From: TILLMAN333(at)aol.com <TILLMAN333(at)aol.com>
Subject: FujiCommander 700
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay God Bless America!!! Let's get a reply from a pilot who actually flew the AC-700. The only corporate 700 that I knew about, was owned and flow professionally by The Golden Rule Insurance Company, Indianapolis Indiana. On more than one occasion, I parked beside the AC-700 while @ (DCA)...then Washington National. No mention of Ronald R. Seems like the N# was N--GR. Oh by the way, specialized N# 's have a 30% greater accident rate than the factory reserved N# 's... (FYI) Fly Safe, Gary Tillman www.flysafeinsurance.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 2001
From: TILLMAN333(at)aol.com <TILLMAN333(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: insurance
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay Mr. Reed. I called you 3 times this am. Paged you 3 times this pm. Thanks GT what is your fax number? try the value of the aircraft x 3% $500 for the liability. If you have your instrument rating the rate will below 2% If you're willing to fly with me, for approval, the rate will be lower. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 2001
From: TILLMAN333(at)aol.com <TILLMAN333(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: insurance / FAR 61.15
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay Dr. Milt: Thanks for the good word. You are progressing as desired by the underwriters. Keep up the good work. I had a Track coach in College who repeated the words "Train Smart...Train Hard" Please fax a copy of your training certificate. Continue to TRAIN. I spoke with the airport manager this am. He will support a "fly-in" at the Rome, Ga airport. We have a large hangar in case of rain, and have the approval for a large tent at the end of the ramp for cooking etc...Rooms will not be a problem if desired. Rome Georgia is wet... FAR 61.15 (the most common reason general aviation pilots have there pilot privileges suspended) you must report the DUI etc...read this... The best time will be in the fall...It's 93 degrees today. Let me know and I'll facilitate the meeting (I'll do the grunt work) if there is enough interest. Milt, there seems to be a know it all attitude among the Commander Group. I, along with several others, suggest a TRAINING MEETING with a MEII who has great knowledge of the Commander series. Emergencies etc...Along with a Mechanic, with Commander experience... Fly Safe, Gary Tillman ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 2001
From: Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk <Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk>
Subject: An explanation
Hello Group, I hope you'll all allow me to explain a few things to those of you who haven't hit the delete button already, given the fact that you've seen who sent this, and are quickly donning your bullet-proof vests. Firstly, I'm going to do one of two things. Either I program the 'Send' button so that only the wife can use it, after she's verified what I'm saying is right and proper. Or, I get a monkey as a pet and get him, or her, to do it. It will probably have more common sense than I seem to have been given. Secondly, I've allowed myself to get far too passionate about Commanders. Far, far, far, too passionate. I should have got myself a hobby which is more appropriate to being domiciled here in the UK. You see, we've got so few over here, my only chance of seeing, photographing them, and meeting owners is to use up my hard-earned cash on getting to the US of A, where I mistakenly anticipate seeing dozens and dozens at Fly-Ins. I should have learnt my lesson by now. Each year, I dream that the Fly-In is going to be different and each year I get disappointed. This year disappointment turned into depression. I don't know why, but I thought this year was going to be different. A monkey has more common sense than I. Anyway, not to be out-flown, distance-wise, by Messrs Conannon & Otaola, I'll be at Hillsboro. Actually, that was never in doubt. If was just me & Capt Jimbob, I know the trip would be worthwhile. Plus, of course, meeting Kevin McCullough again, and getting to know the other guys at Aero Air. Thanks to Wing Commander Gordon, John Vormbaum, Buddy Windham and others, for reminding me what I'm about. I made some rather churlish remarks, admittedly in a fit of pique, and I'm sorry. I'm sorry for most of the remarks I posted, but certainly not sorry for the underlying reason I made them. Thankfully, a number of you have held up your hands and acknowledged that things could have been better handled. I know that a good number of you are busy people, who have taken the risk of building up a business in order to provide a good way of life, and that business cannot be neglected incase it goes down the pan. I've got nothing but admiration for people who do that and that's why you've got a Commander and I haven't. No, that's not sour grapes, it is genuine admiration. If I choose to work 9-5 for a set income, that's my choice - but I'm happy with it! Now, I'm not launching another Exocet missile, but I'd just like to pose a few thoughts for you to mull over. Firstly, Jim has taken over the unenviable task of running the Flight Group. It wasn't as if he started it and was going to build it up. That would be starting a point zero. He's actually taken on a Group starting at minus one hundred, so he's got to re-build up to point zero even before he can even get into a plus situation. I wonder how many people would be prepared to take that on. Not many. I'm not having another 'pop' here, but I'm not very good with words and this is the only way I can think of putting it. One reason said for not being able to attend is 'I'm too busy'. Aren't we fortunate then, that Jim isn't too busy to take the time and trouble to go and sit down with TCAC, FAA et al to resolve issues like the dreaded sump; organise a Fly-In; and produce a magazine for us all to enjoy. I know that Jim will probably not thank me for this unsolicited blowing of his trumpet, but he'll never blow his own, he's too nice a guy. He'll think that you'll all think he's asked me to say it. He hasn't! What a pity that more of you find it impossible to get to the location known as Hillsboro, to thank him in person and shake his hand. He doesn't expect you to do that, of course, but oh boy, would it give him a buzz! I know, to my cost, that trying to organise an event for the benefit of others is an absolute minefield. As they say, 'you can please some of the people some of the time, but not all of the people all of the time'. Jim explained earlier this year of the reasons for choosing Hillsboro, and he was exactly right. He obviously needed to be on the spot, to make sure things ran smoothly, rather than organise something 2,000 miles away, and there had never been a Fly-In on the West Coast before. In future, to get your registration form (and cash!) to Jim well before the event is essential. Firstly, it helps prevent him running YOUR Group out of HIS back pocket. Secondly, he will have a reasonable chance of making sure the event runs smoothly. Surely, you can see that turning up on the day is not conducive to a successful event. In fact, it will have exactly the reverse effect. Those who registered well in advance will probably have their food & drink scoffed, and their seats taken, by ones who may well not have paid anything! Word then later gets around that the event was 'badly organised'! Also, if people ask Jim how many are signed up, there is a good chance they will attend too, if the figures look reasonable. The snowball syndrome kicks in. Jim said, that other than me, I think a couple of people made enquiries this year as to how many were coming. I've no doubt they were guys who attended the last couple of Fly-Ins of the 'old' TCFG, which were poorly attended. It was embarrassing seeing tables and chairs set out for 50-60 people, with about 10 people in attendance. It just didn't send out the right signal. One didn't get that warm fuzzy feelgood factor thing. OK, if there's only a dozen of us there this year, but no spare seats, that at least looks full up! So, next time Jim asks us to get our registration forms in, let's do it, and do it promptly. I'm living with the vision that one year, we'll get at least twenty Commanders to one of the Fly-Ins and the event will then have a good chance of becoming self-perpetuating. When owners read reports of a reasonably large gathering, I'm hoping they'll feel they missed out on something rather special and will be champing at the bit to get to the next one. I wonder if my dream will ever become a reality. I know, I'm selfish. I thought, I don't care what it takes, you should all attend these events, so I can meet you all, get loads and loads of photographs of these magnificent aircraft, with little regard to the logistics of you getting there; how much it costs you; and your business getting neglected. But, when our NHS waiting list permits, I will have the labotomy done and I'll be a more sane person. Or, perhaps William Peper, if I nip down to Waco - you could do it? (Bill is a chest & heart surgeon, for those who haven't had the pleasure of meeting him). Incidentally, none of you will have an excuse next year, rather, hopefully next year. I'm working on an STC that, when fitted to your Commander, will transport it at no cost, and in no time, from wherever you are to wherever the Fly-In is. It's in the early stages of development, and there are a few teething troubles to overcome, but if all goes well, I can sell it for about $5-10. I'm going to call it Will Power. Anyway, Jim, Chris & Max Schuermann, Milt Concannon, Ricardo Otaola, John Vormbaum, Morris Kernick (how did he get the 'Yoda' tag ?), Paul Odum, Barry Hancock and myself (plus Bob & Sonnie Murdock and Wayne Brutger?) are going to have what Jim calls 'a Blast' at Hillsboro. If anybody else wants to join us 'on the day', then of course, you're most welcome. But, PLEASE bring your own seating, food and drink - what's going to be there is spoken for !! If you've read down this far, well done, and thanks for bearing with me. Very Best Regards to You All, Barry (the Bulldog) Collman P.S. I've had better weekends than that last one. Tim Henman lost at Wimbledon; the British Lions got mauled in Oz; and they beat us out of sight at cricket too. Can someone please tell us one thing we're actually good at doing, besides running an election? THIS TRANSMISSION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY If you are not the intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for return. Any distribution or copying of this document by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. Airclaims cannot be held responsible for any alterations made to this document, intentionally or otherwise after tranmission. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: An explanation
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay In a message dated 07/10/01 06:12:50 Pacific Daylight Time, Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk writes: > Can someone please tell us one thing we're actually > good at doing, besides running an election? > Certainly. The Brits are much better at history than Americans. After reading your post, I'd say you're much better at future, as well. Thanks for launching your Verbal Exocet at us, Sir Barry. You're spot on, (as we say over here) and although I'm sure a few featheres will be ruffled, the truth is, well, it was the truth. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 2001
From: Bow <w.bow(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Barry's ass chewing
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay Well Gentlepersons, X-42 to HIO is 15.2hrs and about 400 gallons of motion lotion ONE WAY. (Milt there are points past GPT). I have 1. a newly remodeled fuel s--p 2. a new right hand boost pump 3. spent nearly the same on the GM rolling stock in the garage this summer 4. just returned from the only vacation in 5 years Sorry, I have no ass left for chewing. Suspenders will be next or butt cleavage will result:) JB I can say with great certainty. I would like to but can't make it. Bill Bow ----- Original Message ----- From: <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com> To: ; Cc: Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 11:23 PM Subject: Re: Barry's ass chewing > > Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can > buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From > consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you > waiting for? Try eBay today. > http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay > > HI KIDS......... > > Well, what a firestorm!! First let me say that I am not whining > about the lack of commitment from the group concerning the flyin. I know > that everybody is busy and that summers are hectic. I had been asked by > Barry and others just how many were "signed up" to attend and after a couple > of requests I finally had to stop stalling around and answer him. I know > that many of you are planing to be there but just haven't taken time to send > the paperwork. > Please don't be offended but I had to be truthful. It has however caused > me to rethink the whole flyin issue. Do you, as a group want an annual > event?? Is this summer to soon?? Should we just plan on meeting each year > at the TCAC University, as a group, and spend a little time in the evening > together?? Would someone else like to volunteer to plan the event?? > Look, I don't think the TCFG lives or dies by our flyin. Our group is > growing and in the information age maybe we can get along without an > organized event but I need to know that. If you really don't want to make > time to attend then I really don't want you to feel like you were forced to > do so. The gathering should be fun or what's the point?? > I like the idea of getting together as a group and I have seen positive > things happen when a number of enthusiasts gather to exchange ideas, but it > wont kill our group not to have it. > So, what will it be guys? I will be out a few hundred bucks in deposits > but it isn't the end of the world. This really is your group. I am only > trying to facilitate your needs and wishes. If it is not your wish to > gather, no hard feelings on my part (although I was looking forward to > meeting many of you) I will move on to other important matters. > If you do want to meet, I need to know that to. I know that it is hard > to make commitments in these fast paced times but imagine trying to plan an > event not knowing how many will be there. Do I tell the dinner guy to plan > on 5 or 50 people?? How many airplanes will be parking at Arlington on > Sunday 5 or 50?? You can see that it is really hard for me to plan YOUR > event if YOU wont commit. > Anyway, please don't be hard on Barry. He is an amazing man and a > wonderful asset to our group and to our airplanes, whether you are a member > of the TCFG or not. He is also a good friend. > Please let me know what YOU want YOUR group to do concerning this and > future events. Thanks to all. Jim Metzger Director, Twin Commander Flight > Group > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 2001
From: Bow <w.bow(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: An explanation
Saving the monarchy. bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: <Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk> To: Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 9:11 AM Subject: An explanation > > > Hello Group, > > I hope you'll all allow me to explain a few things to those of you who > haven't hit the delete button already, given the fact that you've seen who > sent this, and are quickly donning your bullet-proof vests. > > Firstly, I'm going to do one of two things. Either I program the 'Send' > button so that only the wife can use it, after she's verified what I'm > saying is right and proper. Or, I get a monkey as a pet and get him, or > her, to do it. It will probably have more common sense than I seem to have > been given. > > Secondly, I've allowed myself to get far too passionate about Commanders. > Far, far, far, too passionate. I should have got myself a hobby which is > more appropriate to being domiciled here in the UK. You see, we've got so > few over here, my only chance of seeing, photographing them, and meeting > owners is to use up my hard-earned cash on getting to the US of A, where I > mistakenly anticipate seeing dozens and dozens at Fly-Ins. I should have > learnt my lesson by now. Each year, I dream that the Fly-In is going to be > different and each year I get disappointed. This year disappointment turned > into depression. I don't know why, but I thought this year was going to be > different. A monkey has more common sense than I. > > Anyway, not to be out-flown, distance-wise, by Messrs Conannon & Otaola, > I'll be at Hillsboro. Actually, that was never in doubt. If was just me & > Capt Jimbob, I know the trip would be worthwhile. Plus, of course, meeting > Kevin McCullough again, and getting to know the other guys at Aero Air. > > Thanks to Wing Commander Gordon, John Vormbaum, Buddy Windham and others, > for reminding me what I'm about. > > I made some rather churlish remarks, admittedly in a fit of pique, and I'm > sorry. > > I'm sorry for most of the remarks I posted, but certainly not sorry for the > underlying reason I made them. Thankfully, a number of you have held up > your hands and acknowledged that things could have been better handled. > > I know that a good number of you are busy people, who have taken the risk > of building up a business in order to provide a good way of life, and that > business cannot be neglected incase it goes down the pan. I've got nothing > but admiration for people who do that and that's why you've got a Commander > and I haven't. No, that's not sour grapes, it is genuine admiration. If I > choose to work 9-5 for a set income, that's my choice - but I'm happy with > it! > > Now, I'm not launching another Exocet missile, but I'd just like to pose a > few thoughts for you to mull over. > > Firstly, Jim has taken over the unenviable task of running the Flight > Group. It wasn't as if he started it and was going to build it up. That > would be starting a point zero. He's actually taken on a Group starting at > minus one hundred, so he's got to re-build up to point zero even before he > can even get into a plus situation. I wonder how many people would be > prepared to take that on. Not many. I'm not having another 'pop' here, but > I'm not very good with words and this is the only way I can think of > putting it. One reason said for not being able to attend is 'I'm too busy'. > Aren't we fortunate then, that Jim isn't too busy to take the time and > trouble to go and sit down with TCAC, FAA et al to resolve issues like the > dreaded sump; organise a Fly-In; and produce a magazine for us all to > enjoy. I know that Jim will probably not thank me for this unsolicited > blowing of his trumpet, but he'll never blow his own, he's too nice a guy. > He'll think that you'll all think he's asked me to say it. He hasn't! What > a pity that more of you find it impossible to get to the location known as > Hillsboro, to thank him in person and shake his hand. He doesn't expect you > to do that, of course, but oh boy, would it give him a buzz! > > I know, to my cost, that trying to organise an event for the benefit of > others is an absolute minefield. As they say, 'you can please some of the > people some of the time, but not all of the people all of the time'. Jim > explained earlier this year of the reasons for choosing Hillsboro, and he > was exactly right. He obviously needed to be on the spot, to make sure > things ran smoothly, rather than organise something 2,000 miles away, and > there had never been a Fly-In on the West Coast before. > > In future, to get your registration form (and cash!) to Jim well before the > event is essential. Firstly, it helps prevent him running YOUR Group out of > HIS back pocket. Secondly, he will have a reasonable chance of making sure > the event runs smoothly. Surely, you can see that turning up on the day is > not conducive to a successful event. In fact, it will have exactly the > reverse effect. Those who registered well in advance will probably have > their food & drink scoffed, and their seats taken, by ones who may well not > have paid anything! Word then later gets around that the event was 'badly > organised'! Also, if people ask Jim how many are signed up, there is a good > chance they will attend too, if the figures look reasonable. The snowball > syndrome kicks in. Jim said, that other than me, I think a couple of people > made enquiries this year as to how many were coming. I've no doubt they > were guys who attended the last couple of Fly-Ins of the 'old' TCFG, which > were poorly attended. It was embarrassing seeing tables and chairs set out > for 50-60 people, with about 10 people in attendance. It just didn't send > out the right signal. One didn't get that warm fuzzy feelgood factor thing. > OK, if there's only a dozen of us there this year, but no spare seats, that > at least looks full up! So, next time Jim asks us to get our registration > forms in, let's do it, and do it promptly. > > I'm living with the vision that one year, we'll get at least twenty > Commanders to one of the Fly-Ins and the event will then have a good chance > of becoming self-perpetuating. When owners read reports of a reasonably > large gathering, I'm hoping they'll feel they missed out on something > rather special and will be champing at the bit to get to the next one. I > wonder if my dream will ever become a reality. > > I know, I'm selfish. I thought, I don't care what it takes, you should all > attend these events, so I can meet you all, get loads and loads of > photographs of these magnificent aircraft, with little regard to the > logistics of you getting there; how much it costs you; and your business > getting neglected. But, when our NHS waiting list permits, I will have the > labotomy done and I'll be a more sane person. Or, perhaps William Peper, if > I nip down to Waco - you could do it? (Bill is a chest & heart surgeon, for > those who haven't had the pleasure of meeting him). > > Incidentally, none of you will have an excuse next year, rather, hopefully > next year. I'm working on an STC that, when fitted to your Commander, will > transport it at no cost, and in no time, from wherever you are to wherever > the Fly-In is. It's in the early stages of development, and there are a few > teething troubles to overcome, but if all goes well, I can sell it for > about $5-10. I'm going to call it Will Power. > > Anyway, Jim, Chris & Max Schuermann, Milt Concannon, Ricardo Otaola, John > Vormbaum, Morris Kernick (how did he get the 'Yoda' tag ?), Paul Odum, > Barry Hancock and myself (plus Bob & Sonnie Murdock and Wayne Brutger?) are > going to have what Jim calls 'a Blast' at Hillsboro. If anybody else wants > to join us 'on the day', then of course, you're most welcome. But, PLEASE > bring your own seating, food and drink - what's going to be there is spoken > for !! > > If you've read down this far, well done, and thanks for bearing with me. > > Very Best Regards to You All, > > Barry (the Bulldog) Collman > > P.S. I've had better weekends than that last one. Tim Henman lost at > Wimbledon; the British Lions got mauled in Oz; and they beat us out of > sight at cricket too. Can someone please tell us one thing we're actually > good at doing, besides running an election? > > > THIS TRANSMISSION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY > > If you are not the intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for > return. Any distribution or copying of this document by anyone other than > the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. Airclaims cannot be held > responsible for any alterations made to this document, intentionally or > otherwise after tranmission. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Re: An explanation
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk wrote: > Hello Group, Barry, I for one not only forgive you, but would like to express my appreciation for you "passion" for Commanders. If it wasn't for your efforts, most of the history of the Commander line would probably fade into oblivion. Besides, a brief outburst from someone who has to drink warm beer, drive cars that have lucas electrical systems, and eats mad cows is to be expected from time-to-time :-) Your comments (even when negative) are accepted and welcome as they come from the heart of a person who has truely poured himself into a honorable task only for the love of the topic. I'd say that every point you've made has been completely valid and I take no offense whatsoever. I'm glad to hear that you will be attending the flying. I am going to make very effort to be there myself even if I have to drive. Look forward to seeing "whoever" shows! Chris PS: I branded Morris with the "Yoda" tag a long time back as a reference to the Star Wars character who was very wise. (okay, actually, the two of them DO kinda look alike and have similar personalities, but that wasn't the point :-) Yoda raised a downed ship from a swamp and I've seen Morris perform comparable miracles as well... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 2001
From: Bow <w.bow(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: An explanation
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay HERE HERE Thanks for sticking around, Sir(if I can use your first name). Do you know that in the UK they call Lucas Electric....... the Prince of Darkness? bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Schuermann" <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com> To: Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 2:33 PM Subject: Re: An explanation > > Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can > buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From > consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you > waiting for? Try eBay today. > http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay > > Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk wrote: > > Hello Group, > > Barry, > I for one not only forgive you, but would like to express my > appreciation > for you "passion" for Commanders. If it wasn't for your efforts, most > of > the history of the Commander line would probably fade into oblivion. > Besides, a brief outburst from someone who has to drink warm beer, drive > cars that have lucas electrical systems, and eats mad cows is to be > expected from time-to-time :-) > Your comments (even when negative) are accepted and welcome as they come > from the heart of a person who has truely poured himself into a > honorable > task only for the love of the topic. I'd say that every point you've > made > has been completely valid and I take no offense whatsoever. I'm glad to > hear that you will be attending the flying. I am going to make very > effort > to be there myself even if I have to drive. Look forward to seeing > "whoever" shows! > > Chris > > PS: I branded Morris with the "Yoda" tag a long time back as a reference > to > the Star Wars character who was very wise. (okay, actually, the two of > them > DO kinda look alike and have similar personalities, but that wasn't the > point :-) > Yoda raised a downed ship from a swamp and I've seen Morris perform > comparable miracles as well... > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 2001
From: Barry Collman <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: Re: An explanation
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay | Barry, | I for one not only forgive you, but would like to express my appreciation | for your "passion" for Commanders. If it wasn't for your efforts, most | of the history of the Commander line would probably fade into oblivion. | | Besides, a brief outburst from someone who has to drink warm beer, drive cars | that have Lucas electrical systems, and eats mad cows is to be expected from time-to-time :-) Thanks Chris, but I cannot hide under any of those excuses. 1. I don't drink any more. Well, I do, 'cos I get thirsty every now and again, but not alcohol. Well, I do drink alcohol, but not much. Nothin' against it, just got bored with it, having over-indulged until about 10 years ago. Don't worry, I'll keep up with the best of them at Hillsboro !! 2. I drive an old Mercedes, so the electrics are not a problem. The problem is towing my own fuel truck behind the car so I have enough gas to call on to get to & from work. Also have a Securicor armored van on call to carry enough cash to pay for the fuel when the fuel truck needs topping up. 3. Ah! Mad cow disease. Perhaps that is the problem. Of course, yes, that's why I had a good 'beef' the other day. I don't know whether you get our (old) TV program 'One Foot In The Grave' over there, but my problem is that I'm getting more and more like Victor Meldrew as each month passes. 'I don't believe it' - but her indoors (the Mrs) reckons it's true! | Your comments (even when negative) are accepted and welcome as they come | from the heart of a person who has truely poured himself into a honorable | task only for the love of the topic. I'd say that every point you've made | has been completely valid and I take no offense whatsoever. I'm glad to | hear that you will be attending the flying. I am going to make very effort | to be there myself even if I have to drive. Look forward to seeing | "whoever" shows! | | Chris | | PS: I branded Morris with the "Yoda" tag a long time back as a reference | to the Star Wars character who was very wise. (okay, actually, the two of | them DO kinda look alike and have similar personalities, but that wasn't the | point :-) Yoda raised a downed ship from a swamp and I've seen Morris perform | comparable miracles as well... OK, I can understand that now. I must get out more. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 2001
From: Barry Collman <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: Re: An explanation
Hi bilbo! | | Thanks for sticking around, Sir(if I can use your first name). | | Do you know that in the UK they call Lucas Electric....... the Prince of Darkness? | | bilbo No, I didn't, but that's very funny. Talking of 'funny', I've never heard before now that Lucas electrics were a problem, and I've been driving since about 1964 ! Perhaps we exported all the 4pm Friday-built ones !! Either that or it rains so much over here, the dampness actually helps keep the circuit intact? Nah! we use Bosch gear !!! On the subject of driving: If you're driving in the Indy 500 and make fifteen pit-stops, one for fuel and fourteen to ask for directions, you might be a RED-NECKED COMMANDER PILOT! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Ouch!!
Have you visited eBayTM lately? The Worlds Marketplace where you can buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better. From consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay. What are you waiting for? Try eBay today. http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay Sorry for tieing up the line but someone(I hit the wrong button)asked where I was moving to,Pensacola Fla.Also asked how I broke my back,all eight places in one place(skid steer loader)Yhanks for asking. Al Oh,Milt just sent me a photo of ETHEL? Loookin Goooood! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 2001
From: MRPOULIN27(at)aol.com <MRPOULIN27(at)aol.com>
Subject: "Blast" at Hillsboro
Sir Barry and Gang! I don't think you can ever be too passionate. Ever. Since becoming a member of TCFG, and reading about Commanders and yall's experiences, the flame burns stronger than ever. I've been reading "Flying Magazine" since I was 14. I am now 39. That's 25 years of anxiously waiting to earn my wings. After busting my a** for the last 17 years trying to build a company, I am now ready to do so. Time to smell the roses. The purchase of my AC 685 from Dick MacCoon will be final within a week to ten days, and I can't even fly it. I know "bass ackwards"; just counldn't wait. Hopefully by fall :-) !!! Anyway, I'm trying to get my instuctor to fly us and our girlfriends to Hillsboro. I know. . . wrong seat. Right Plane though! If that doesn't work out, is there anyone out there willing to fly left seat? Myrtle Beach, SC to Hillsboro, OR. Anyone !?! And if so, maybe Sir Barry would like to join us? (Barry, all you need is a ticket to MYR) I look forward too meeting as many of you as possible. Is there anyone else sitting on the fence? I hope you can make it! With warmest regards, Mark Mark R. Poulin 3946 Wachesaw Centre POB 1222 Murrells Inlet, SC 29576 WK(843)357-3199 FX(843)357-1098 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 13, 2001
From: John Vormbaum <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: ME checkride
Re: ME checkrideWhat is this, like a hole-in-one thing for golf? I think somebody owes ME a beer, since I easily sweated out a 12-pack on my ball-busting FAA-accompanied checkride! That's another story I have to put together. The FAA was testing my Examiner while on my IFR checkride. Pucker-factor of 9.5!!!!! /J ----- Original Message ----- From: Milt To: Barry Hancock ; John Vormbaum ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 12:36 PM Subject: Re: ME checkride If I remember correctly its those who pass the checkride that should be buying Corona's for the rest of us. Milt ----- Original Message ----- From: Barry Hancock To: John Vormbaum ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 12:01 PM Subject: Re: ME checkride Deal! Barry, congratulations! Get to northern CA and I'll supply you with a Corona myself! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 13, 2001
From: Milt <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Commander chat address
I have 2 commander chat addresses one contains skymaster one doesnt which is correct? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 25, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Commander
> >jean jean-ph wrote: > > > > we have a plane aero commander to sell > >I'll pass this along to the group. > >Chris thank you chris i can give you more info aero commander inc bethany okla manufactures model 680 fl manuf serial number 1355-34 type cert2-a-4 production certificate 203 engine type igso-540bia mfrs air assn plate no 286812 best regards jean pierre ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 25, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: NAME TAGS
HI KIDS................... I hate to be a bother but I REALLY need to get your registration form in. I know that several of you are planing to come, but no form. I am working on name tags and will need to have the information soon. Thanks. Thanks Buddy and Kerry Windham, got yours today, sorry you wont be bringing the 560E but it will be great to meet you. Thanks to all................jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 2001
From: JETPAUL(at)aol.com <JETPAUL(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: A bit of history
Was that sump joke from Von Braum??? or Vorbaum???? If you got that one just listen to the next one. I was reading Aviation Leak (intended) and Space Technology yesterday, and it seams that the Shuttle DID INDEED have a fuel sump A.D. They are modifying all of the fuel pumps on the shuttle from a welded (100 total welds in all) to a cast piece that weighs 300 pounds more, but should prove to be 80% more reliable!!!! Paul (and you thought I was an unlernt [intended again] RNCP!!) Reason ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 2001
From: JETPAUL(at)aol.com <JETPAUL(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: interruption
Hey Chris, I too am a BMW FANATIC. But since I am also a RNCP you must at least try to explain to your wife that a 2 Cylinder "POPPIN JOHN" is worth more than a 94 540I Sport package with a 6 speed!!!!! And therefore worthy of the garage space!! Any failure on your part to do so will result in your being "CUT OFF" from the "NO NAME" that Allen has!!!!! Can I get an A-MEN for a John Deer??? O.K. let's be politically correct here also, since there is also one female member. Can I also have an A-WOMEN!!!! Paul (its not my fault, I grew up on a farm) Reason ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 2001
From: JETPAUL(at)aol.com <JETPAUL(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Heeeee'SSS trippin
Hey Allen!!!! maybe best to not email the whole group after a night of "NO NAME"!!! Just remember to save some for me at the Rome Fly in!!!!! As Jimmy Buffet would say: "like cool honey dew vine water trickling off the vine!!" "IF YOU ARE PAYING 210/HOUR DRY JUST TO GET TO FLY A COMMANDER.......YOU MIGHT BE A RNCP!!!" Paul (my wife is about to leave me over this airplane!!) Reason ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 2001
From: John Vormbaum <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: A bit of history
Paul, "My bad" on that joke... Um, I think I have one of those welded fuel pumps in my 500B. Well, it doesn't have that many welds, but I seem to remember it costing about the same as the Shuttle's fuel pump... /John PS: If I could only find some of that 100LL-distilled-in-a-chevy-radiator Shuttle fuel, I'd be a RNCP too.... ----- Original Message ----- From: <JETPAUL(at)aol.com> To: ; Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 10:48 PM Subject: Re: A bit of history > Was that sump joke from Von Braum??? or Vorbaum???? > > If you got that one just listen to the next one. > > I was reading Aviation Leak (intended) and Space Technology yesterday, and it > seams that the Shuttle DID INDEED have a fuel sump A.D. > > They are modifying all of the fuel pumps on the shuttle from a welded (100 > total welds in all) to a cast piece that weighs 300 pounds more, but should > prove to be 80% more reliable!!!! > > Paul (and you thought I was an unlernt [intended again] RNCP!!) Reason > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 2001
From: AOPA ePilot Newsletter <aopa_news(at)aopa.org>
Subject: AOPA ePilot -- Vol. 3, Issue 30
AOPA ePilot--Vol. 3, Issue 29 Departments Inside AOPA On Capitol Hill Airport Support Network ASF News Quiz Me! 2001 Bonanza Sweepstakes ePilot Calendar Weekend Weather Eclipse announces airplane, schedule changes Piper revamps customer service system UPSAT adds Jepp approach charts to MX20 AOPA continues fight as UWB decision nears Volume 3, Issue 30 July 27, 2001 GA News FINANCIAL WOES STRESS MOONEY, CEO RESIGNS While Mooney Aircraft Company representatives are in Oshkosh to sell airplanes, more than $300,000 in overdue local taxes await them in Kerrville, Texas, where the company is based. In addition, Mooney President and CEO Chris Dopp has resigned; no reason was given for his departure. A company official told ePilot that Mooney has reduced its workforce from 220 to 150 employees through furloughs. But the local newspaper, The Kerrville Daily Times, reported Wednesday that 85 percent of the workforce was furloughed, citing anonymous company sources. The official said the company plans to negotiate a tax repayment plan by a July 31 deadline, and that Mooney will continue to build and sell airplanes. ECLIPSE ANNOUNCES AIRPLANE, SCHEDULE CHANGES Eclipse Aviation ended several months of public silence on the progress of its six-place Eclipse 500 light twinjet with several announcements at EAA AirVenture in Oshkosh, including some exterior refinements, updated instrument panel and interior configurations--and a revised timetable for first flight, FAA certification, and first customer deliveries. First flight of the Eclipse 500 is now scheduled to take place in July 2002, one month later than originally planned. FAA certification slips to December 2003, with first customer delivery in January 2004. "What we've done is restructure the program to get the first airplane in the air," said Eclipse CEO Vern Raburn. Eclipse will start cutting metal for the first airplane this September and begin assembly in November. For more on this story, see AOPA Online. PIPER REVAMPS CUSTOMER SERVICE SYSTEM The New Piper Aircraft has launched an initiative to revamp how the company treats its customers. The first phase of the eight-step program was implemented July 16. It is a computerized customer response system called PULSE, for Piper Unlimited Liaison via Standards of Excellence, and is based on a software tracking program developed by Seibel Systems. "What we are launching today is nothing less than the new face of Piper, as it will be seen in the future by our customers and the world," Piper President and CEO Chuck Suma said. The system will be expanded over the course of the next year. Every Piper employee will have access to data on any individual customer's requests or service problems. Eventually each customer will have a customized Web page. Officials said the system will bring service levels in the general aviation aircraft industry up to the s UPSAT ADDS JEPP APPROACH CHARTS TO MX20 UPS Aviation Technologies (UPSAT) announced upgrades to its popular MX20 multifunction display that will let pilots view Jeppesen instrument approach charts, terminal area charts, and airport surface charts on the MX20's moving map display. These new display functions, called Chart View, will automatically display charts appropriate to various phases of flight. The Chart View upgradeavailable September 1is priced at $2,495, but early subscribers will get a $500 discount. Jeppesen database updates to support Chart View will have an initial cost of $126; the annual revision service (a CD-ROM update every 14 days) is priced at $839 per year. The CD-ROM will also let subscribers print hard copies of approach charts and surface charts. eBAY CREATES AVIATION SECTION eBay, which claims to be the world's largest online marketplace, has realized the importance of aviation. The company announced that it is creating an aviation category on its Web site for airplanes, parts, and memorabilia. Also, eBay said that a special auction will take place on August 6 that will include a Cessna 182 once owned by the late John F. Kennedy Jr., a de Havilland Vampire owned by John Travolta, and the helicopter that was used in the TV show "Airwolf." For a preview, see the Web site. COMM1 LAUNCHES AVIATION SCHOLARSHIPS Planning for a career in aviation? Need scholarship money? E-publishing Group has announced the new Comm1 Aviation Scholarship Program for aspiring aviators. Two $1,000 scholarships are being offered to raise awareness of the importance of pilot communication skills by the company, which produces interactive radio communication simulators. The application deadline is October 1. The winners will be announced at AOPA Expo 2001 in November. For more information and an application, see the Web site. See AOPA Online for more EAA AirVenture coverage, or for daily news updates. Inside AOPA FAA REWRITES AIRPORT SECURITY RULE The FAA recently completed a 15-year effort to revise FAR Part 107, which covers security requirements for airports. Generally, the rule's security access control mandates affect AOPA members based at or conducting operations to the nearly 300 airports served by airlines using passenger aircraft of 60 seats or more. It is important that GA aircraft operations not be adversely impacted as the revised regulation and the associated requirements for badges, security training, and background checks are incorporated into airport security programs over the next two years. AOPA staff is working to educate the FAA about the differences in the use of GA areas at Part 107 airports compared to those used by the airlines, and will respond at specific airports where attempts are made to inappropriately restrict GA access. AOPA CONTINUES FIGHT AS UWB DECISION NEARS In the latest effort to curb an onerous rulemaking proposal, AOPA has joined a coalition of 38 other groups from a wide range of industries to oppose a Federal Communication Commission (FCC) proposal to allow unlicensed uses of ultra-wideband (UWB) radio technology. The coalition recently submitted a letter to top government officials urging them to mitigate any harmful effects. AOPA recently learned that the FCC intends to issue a final rule by the end of the year for UWB. The proposal would allow for the further expansion of wireless communications where UWB developers would not need to obtain licenses. But the aviation, cellular, and satellite communications industries have raised concerns about potential interference with communication and navigation frequencies if there isn't adequate regulation. Of particular concern is the possible effect on GPS signals that could present dangers for pilots. See FAA COMMITS TO PHASED APPROACH FOR DRVSM In response to concerns expressed by AOPA and other representatives of the general aviation community, the FAA has agreed to phase in domestic reduced vertical separation minima (DRVSM) operations and airspace. The first phase will commence by December 2004, impacting aircraft that fly between Flight Level 350 and FL390. Although the ultimate goal is to lower DRVSM to FL290, AOPA was concerned that doing so would create a hardship for many operators who wouldn't have time to comply. The FAA has not set a date for the second phase that includes altitudes of FL290 and above. See AOPA Onlline. AOPA WELCOMES CORLISS EFFECT AOPA has appointed Brian H. Corliss as its Northeast regional representative. Corliss will represent AOPA in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont. "Brian comes from a New England aviation family," said AOPA President Phil Boyer. "His passion for aviation and the region, plus his experience working with government agencies and state legislatures, make him uniquely qualified to represent the interests of general aviation pilots in the Northeast." A former pilot for the FBI, Corliss currently owns and operates Corliss Associates, which provides commercial aviation services including aerial survey and photography services. Corliss owns a Cessna Cardinal RG and has more than 4,000 hours flying experience. Changing your mailing or e-mail addresses? Click here to update. On Capitol Hill SHOOTDOWN RESTRICTIONS ARE ADDED TO BILL Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.) added an amendment this week to the Foreign Operations Appropriations bill (H.R.2506), cutting $65 million from the bill's $676 million for expected aid to Peru unless the secretary of state submits to Congress a full report on the April 20 shootdown of an aircraft carrying American missionaries in the country. The provision also stipulates that the secretaries of state and defense and the director of the CIA certify to Congress that the force-down program will include safeguards to prevent the occurrence of any similar incident. Over the past 15 years, AOPA has opposed proposed changes in policy authorizing the shoot-down or force-down of civil aircraft here and abroad. After the April 20 incident, AOPA President Phil Boyer submitted testimony to Congress condemning the use of deadly force against civilian aircraft. See AOPA Online. AOPA, CONGRESSMAN OPPOSE BAN ON FISH SPOTTERS Responding to a proposed amendment to the Senate Commerce-Justice-State (C-J-S) Appropriations bill (S.1215) that would prohibit the Department of Commerce from issuing licenses for aerial fish spotters, AOPA sent a letter Monday requesting that senators resist adding this provision to the bill. Rep. James Hansen (R-Utah), an AOPA member, also sent a letter to the C-J-S subcommittee, asking its chairman to oppose any efforts to add such language to any Senate appropriations bill. The proposed amendment would maintain the prohibition against use of aircraft in Atlantic bluefin tuna fishing. The amendment's intent is to reduce competition among fishery participants. AOPA, along with some environmental and conservation groups, believes that spotter aircraft play a crucial environmental role by directing fisherman away from undersized tuna. See AOPA Online. Airport Support Network VOLUNTEER OF THE WEEKPAUL DeVORE Paul DeVore is taking to the air to promote general aviation. DeVore, who is the AOPA Airport Support Network volunteer for Morgantown Municipal-Walter L. Bill Hart Field in West Virginia, departs September 7 on his solo flight to 34 states, a distance of 7,778 nautical miles. At each airport, he will talk with other ASN volunteers and airport managers about ways to promote GA. He also will be promoting Scholarship Challenge, a program designed to create aviation education and training scholarships. To learn more about the Airport Support Network, visit AOPA Online. AOPA Air Safety Foundation News ASF BOXES TWO POPULAR SEMINARS Two of the AOPA Air Safety Foundation's most popular live safety seminars, "Collision Avoidance" and "GPS for VFR Operations," are now available as prepackaged Seminar-in-a-Box programs for small groups. ASF Seminar-in-a-Box programs provide fast-paced, riveting safety information for pilots who are unable to attend ASF safety seminars that take place regularly throughout the country. Programs include the same information presented in the live seminars, and features videos, safety pamphlets, and a presenter's guide. Evaluation forms and door prizes complete the package. Although all Seminar-in-a-Box programs are free to aviation safety counselors, flying clubs, and other organized aviation groups, there is a $24.95 charge for shipping and handling. These seminars satisfy the safety meeting requirements of the FAA's "Wings" safety program. To order, see AOPA Online. Quiz Me! Heres a question asked by an AOPA member last week of our AOPA technical specialists. Test your knowledge. Question: I'm planning a flight that will take me through restricted and alert airspace. What do I have to do for clearance through the restricted airspace and do I have to do anything, besides staying extra vigilant, when flying through the alert airspace? Answer: To gain clearance through restricted airspace, a pilot should contact the controlling agency that is listed in the border of the sectional chart, which will grant or deny access depending on what activities are taking place. In alert airspace, the pilot should exercise extreme vigilance because of the high volume of aerial activity. AOPA offers information on the status of special use airspace (SUA) on AOPA Online. Got a technical question for AOPA specialists? Call 800/872-2672 or e-mail to inforequest(at)aopa.org. Send comments on our Quiz Me! questions to epilot(at)aopa.org. AOPA Sweepstakes Bonanza Update AOPA Pilot Editor at Large Thomas A. Horne flies the 2001 AOPA Sweepstakes Bonanza to Oshkosh in our latest project update. Take a look at the gauges to see for yourself how this aluminum rocket performs. See AOPA Online. On The Road To Expo The AOPA Air Safety Foundation will host a golf tournament on November 7 called "Score for GA Safety." The tournament will take place at the Palm Aire Country Club in Pompano Beach, Florida, one day prior to AOPA Expo 2001 in nearby Fort Lauderdale. It begins with lunch at noon, followed by a 1 p.m. shotgun start. There are several prizes and all proceeds will directly benefit ASF's mission of promoting general aviation safety, education, research, and training. Click here to register or become a sponsor. For more on Expo, see AOPA Online. What's New At AOPA Online The AOPA Airport Support Network's Where Will You Land Tomorrow? brochure is now available on AOPA Online. Click here to download. ePilot Calendar WEEKEND FLYING DESTINATIONS Broomfield, Colorado. The Jeffco Airport Open House Fly-In 2001 takes place August 4 at Jeffco Airport (BJC). Call 303/466-2314 for event information. Fort Wayne, Indiana. The sixtieth annual Air Expo takes place August 4 and 5 at Fort Wayne International Airport (FWA). Call 219/747-4146 for event information. Norridgewock, Maine. The "Everything That Flies" Fly-In takes place August 4 and 5 at Central Maine Regional Airport (OWK). Call 207/634-5351 for event information. FLYING DESTINATIONS IN YOUR AREA CHINO, CALIFORNIA. The Planes of Fame Air Museum at Chino Airport (CNO) presents a flight demonstration of the Grumman F-6F Hellcat August 4. Call 909/597-3722 for event information. For more airport details, see AOPA's Airport Directory Online. For more events, see Aviation Calendar of Events ASF SAFETY SEMINARS The next AOPA ASF Safety Seminars are scheduled in East Windsor, Connecticut, August 6 ("Fuel Awareness"); Andover, Massachusetts, August 8 ("Fuel Awareness"); Portsmouth, New Hampshire, August 9 ("Fuel Awareness"); Troy, Michigan, August 10 and 11 ("Single Pilot IFR," "Weather Tactics," and "Weather Strategies"). See AOPA Online for more information. ASF FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR REFRESHER CLINICS (All clinics start at 7:30 a.m.) The next AOPA Air Safety Foundation Flight Instructor Refresher Clinics are scheduled in Newark, New Jersey; Allentown, Pennsylvania; and Dallas, Texas, August 4 and 5. For the Flight Instructor Refresher Clinic schedule, see AOPA Online. ASF PINCH-HITTER GROUND-SCHOOL COURSES (Pinch-Hitter courses start at 9:30 a.m.) The next Pinch-Hitter Ground School will take place August 5 in Allentown, Pennsylvania. For more Pinch-Hitter courses, see AOPA Online. For comments on calendar items or to make submissions, contact Julie S. Walker at julie.walker(at)aopa.org. Contacting ePilot Got news? Contact ePilot at nate.ferguson(at)aopa.org. Due to the large volume of mail received, we regret that we are unable to individually answer all correspondence. Having difficulty using this service? Visit the ePilot Frequently Asked Questions now at AOPA Online or write to epilot(at)aopa.org. You are currently subscribed as NAME-NICO VAN NIEKERK eMail Address-NICO(at)CYBERSUPERSTORE.COM. Changing your mailing or e-mail addresses? Click here to update. To UNSUBSCRIBE: Click here Unsubscribe, then hit the "Send" button. Do not include a message. To SUBSCRIBE: visit http://www.aopa.org/members/epilot.html. AOPA, 421 Aviation Way, Frederick, MD 21701 Tel: 800/USA-AOPA or 301/695-2000 Copyright 2001. Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association. Advertisers ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 2001
From: John Vormbaum <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: interruption
Um, "Nothing Runs Like a DEERE." See, I could be an Honorary Southerner! /John PS: I've owned 4 BMW's. What other car could make driving nearly as safe as flying? PPS: I'm angry at BMW. Did you guys (and 1 gal at least) hear about BMW trying to ground the Vickers Vimy (which is based at my lovely girlfriend's field in Novato, CA) so they couldn't get to Oshkosh? SHAME!!! Lucky for us U.S. lawyers seem to be better, I hear the Vimy made it.... PPPS: I got a ride in a '01 BMW M5, it could chirp 3rd gear at about 70mph, I think the speed made my hairline recede even more. ----- Original Message ----- From: <JETPAUL(at)aol.com> To: ; Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 11:00 PM Subject: Re: interruption > Hey Chris, I too am a BMW FANATIC. But since I am also a RNCP you must at > least try to explain to your wife that a 2 Cylinder "POPPIN JOHN" is worth > more than a 94 540I Sport package with a 6 speed!!!!! And therefore worthy > of the garage space!! Any failure on your part to do so will result in your > being "CUT OFF" from the "NO NAME" that Allen has!!!!! > > Can I get an A-MEN for a John Deer??? O.K. let's be politically correct here > also, since there is also one female member. Can I also have an A-WOMEN!!!! > > Paul (its not my fault, I grew up on a farm) Reason > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 27, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Re: interruption
John Vormbaum wrote: > PPS: I'm angry at BMW. Did you guys (and 1 gal at least) hear about BMW > trying to ground the Vickers Vimy (which is based at my lovely girlfriend's > field in Novato, CA) so they couldn't get to Oshkosh? SHAME!!! Yea, that one really burned me. I have always held BMW in the highest regard. When the crew building the Vickers was having such a difficult time trying to power the beast, BMW stepped up to the plate and designed them a custom engine based upon their existing 5L V-12 auto motor with a custom gearbox. How many other companies would have (could have) done that. The Vickers guys have been flying this thing all over the world, but they get to the US and BMW-NA's legal staff hacks a furball over the "potential liability" issues and slaps the owners with a court order to not fly as well as arranging for a surprise FAA airworthiness inspection (which they passed)!. I both called and wrote to BMW expressing my EXTREME displeasure with their actions. No doubt it was some small contingent of small-minded lawyers on an ego trip that started this, but it should have been axed at the top levels. Y'all know that the BMW logo represents an aircraft prop right? BMW started life as an aircraft engine company. ....done ranting now.... chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 27, 2001
From: Mark Woodley <woodlema(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: RNCMP
You might Be a Red neck commander pilot if you spend $16,000.00 to repaint your commander John Deer Green and apply for the tail number NJDEER and put a bumper sticker on the fusalage that says, My other plane is a John Deer. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 27, 2001
From: N700PF(at)aol.com <N700PF(at)aol.com>
Subject: NEW OMPUTER
HI KIDS... Just seeing if the new computer that my wife gave me for my birthday (yesterday) Hope all is well with everybody jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 27, 2001
From: N700PF(at)aol.com <N700PF(at)aol.com>
Subject: MORE ATTENDEES
HI KIDS.......... We have some more confirmed attendees. Al Thalmeir of Toppenish, WA will be there. He owns a 680E and I hope he will be bringing it. Also, Mike and Randi Macocko from Vas Vegas will also be there. They are looking to buy their first Commander and have become good friends with "Wing Commander Gordon." Also, Uris Frey is our newest TCFG member. He flies a 500 A with all the right stuff and less that 3000TT!! Welcome!! lousy weather here in SEA no good for open cockpit biplane fides :-( Have a great weekend all jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 28, 2001
From: w.bow <w.bow(at)att.net>
Subject: BMW
I prefer to cruise behind the "Gun Site", the Star and the Wreath.(here we go again) bilbo ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 28, 2001
From: Andrew Foss <afoss(at)caw.com>
Subject: Re: MORE ATTENDEES
I'll be coming from the Bay Area, bringing Yoda. If anyone else would like to ride w/ us, let me know! andrew N700PF(at)aol.com wrote: > HI KIDS.......... > > We have some more confirmed attendees. Al Thalmeir of Toppenish, WA > will be there. He owns a 680E and I hope he will be bringing it. Also, Mike > and Randi Macocko from Vas Vegas will also be there. They are looking to buy > their first Commander and have become good friends with "Wing Commander > Gordon." > Also, Uris Frey is our newest TCFG member. He flies a 500 A with all the > right stuff and less that 3000TT!! Welcome!! > lousy weather here in SEA no good for open cockpit biplane fides :-( > Have a great weekend all jb > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 28, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <tylorh(at)sound.net>
Subject: Re: MORE ATTENDEES
Ok Gang, I am coming. JB, send me the form to fill out. E-mail or fax it. I need a ride from the Midwest. I will buy tanks of gas to any Twin Commander going by. I do not want to ride the airlines. I know where to buy self service AVGAS at good rates. I am in the Kansas City area. There are several airports around here that have low cost gas. Call me. I saw a quote in a book that said that if you fly the airlines through a hub less than 500 miles, you average travel will be between 50 and 60 mile per hour from your home to return. You could drive it faster. What a great argument for owning an airplane. Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Foss [mailto:afoss(at)caw.com] Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 11:12 AM To: N700PF(at)aol.com Cc: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Subject: Re: MORE ATTENDEES I'll be coming from the Bay Area, bringing Yoda. If anyone else would like to ride w/ us, let me know! andrew N700PF(at)aol.com wrote: > HI KIDS.......... > > We have some more confirmed attendees. Al Thalmeir of Toppenish, WA > will be there. He owns a 680E and I hope he will be bringing it. Also, Mike > and Randi Macocko from Vas Vegas will also be there. They are looking to buy > their first Commander and have become good friends with "Wing Commander > Gordon." > Also, Uris Frey is our newest TCFG member. He flies a 500 A with all the > right stuff and less that 3000TT!! Welcome!! > lousy weather here in SEA no good for open cockpit biplane fides :-( > Have a great weekend all jb > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 28, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: MORE ATTENDEES
In a message dated 7/28/2001 10:00:16 AM Pacific Daylight Time, tylorh(at)sound.net writes: << I saw a quote in a book that said that if you fly the airlines through a hub less than 500 miles, you average travel will be between 50 and 60 mile per hour from your home to return. You could drive it faster. What a great argument for owning an airplane. >> THAT IS SOOOOO TRUE!! People forget that travel time is not "in the air" time. Triple 2 will routinely beat a Boeing 737 from my front door to my folks house in Idaho (450 miles) Now, with the need to arrive an hour or more before the flight, it is even easier to out run an airliner. Will you be traveling alone?? Let me know so I can make a name tag GREAT to hear you will be there, we are going to have a great time. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 28, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: OLD ADS
HI KIDS... I want to thank TCFG member Jim Jorgenson for all the GREAT ads and articles he shared with me. We had lunch yesterday and he gave me about 15 Ads from magazines, many that I didn't have and several advertising the original Turbo Commander. (ever seen a "short nose" turbine??) There are also some mag. articles on the 500A and U and the straight 500, FUN STUFF!!! Jim and Lori will be at the gathering as well. They are looking for their first Commander (a straight 500??) Thanks again Jim, all of you will be seeing the ads in future issues of the FGN. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 28, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <tylorh(at)sound.net>
Subject: Re: One more attendee?
Nico, www.aerocommander.com You will find the details of the fly-in Aug 24-26 in Hillsboro, OR HIO There was an announcement in Flying Mag. This month. Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 -----Original Message----- From: Nico van Niekerk [mailto:nico(at)cybersuperstore.com] Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 6:15 PM To: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Subject: One more attendee? Hi guys, I have been on an extended trip to England and Europe and have been out of the loop for a while. I used to own a straight 500 for many years and am considering getting a Charlie again. I would like to attend the fly-in but I have no details where and when exactly it will be held. Could someone email me that info so that I can check if it would be possible to be there. Not much will keep me from coming. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com> To: Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 10:30 AM Subject: OLD ADS > HI KIDS... > > I want to thank TCFG member Jim Jorgenson for all the GREAT ads and > articles he shared with me. We had lunch yesterday and he gave me about 15 > Ads from magazines, many that I didn't have and several advertising the > original Turbo Commander. (ever seen a "short nose" turbine??) There are > also some mag. articles on the 500A and U and the straight 500, FUN STUFF!!! > Jim and Lori will be at the gathering as well. They are looking for > their first Commander (a straight 500??) Thanks again Jim, all of you will > be seeing the ads in future issues of the FGN. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 28, 2001
From: Paul Odum <calnet01(at)gte.net>
Subject: Re: One more attendee?
Nick, I am going up there next month if would like to go. I am going up om 8/24. Paul Nico van Niekerk wrote: > Hi guys, > I have been on an extended trip to England and Europe and have been out of > the loop for a while. I used to own a straight 500 for many years and am > considering getting a Charlie again. I would like to attend the fly-in but I > have no details where and when exactly it will be held. Could someone email > me that info so that I can check if it would be possible to be there. Not > much will keep me from coming. > Nico > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com> > To: > Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 10:30 AM > Subject: OLD ADS > > > HI KIDS... > > > > I want to thank TCFG member Jim Jorgenson for all the GREAT ads > and > > articles he shared with me. We had lunch yesterday and he gave me about > 15 > > Ads from magazines, many that I didn't have and several advertising the > > original Turbo Commander. (ever seen a "short nose" turbine??) There are > > also some mag. articles on the 500A and U and the straight 500, FUN > STUFF!!! > > Jim and Lori will be at the gathering as well. They are looking for > > their first Commander (a straight 500??) Thanks again Jim, all of you > will > > be seeing the ads in future issues of the FGN. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 28, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: THE MOVIES
HI KIDS I just got back from the new Jurassic Park 111, I thought it was great movie but I think I will lock the Iguana in the galley before I go to bed tonight!! I can happily report that "no Twin Commanders were killed or injured in the making of this film" However, Beech Kig Air 300, N622DC had a really bad day at the office!! Man did they trash that poor old gal. Anyway, was a good day to see a movie and a lousy day to fly biplanes, Oh well. Hope all is well with all of you. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 28, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: THE MOVIES
OH,YEA.................................... I forgot, it would have been a lot shorter movie if they had been flying a Turbo Commander instead of a King Air, they would have got off short enough to have missed hitting the T-Rex on take off and....................... jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 28, 2001
From: Paul Odum <calnet01(at)gte.net>
Subject: Oshkosh Report
Hi there folks, Got back from Oshkosh yesterday. Nothing spectaclar to report. Julie Clark almost balled up her pretty T-34 during the airshow. We got VIP seats for that from our friends mom who ran VIP seating ! Put in 10.3 total time and 8.8 flight on the 680E yesterday ! She never missed a beat. The whole trip was 23.3 Total Time and 19.3 flight. Oshkosh has had me ! Did see some cool avionics but they aren't certified for us unless you want to slap EXPERIMENTAL on your bird. Which might not be a bad idea anyway. Then you can get the cool stuff. Paul ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 28, 2001
From: Bruce A. Campbell <baruch(at)intelligentflight.com>
Subject: Re: THE MOVIES
For further info, watch "Clear and Present Danger". IT's shocking that a pilot like Harrison Ford wouldn't have rescued.... Well, just see it *sob* Bruce A. Campbell N4186B AC 52 and Fiercely Proud of IT! YOURTCFG(at)aol.com wrote: > HI KIDS > > I just got back from the new Jurassic Park 111, I thought it was > great movie but I think I will lock the Iguana in the galley before I go to > bed tonight!! I can happily report that "no Twin Commanders were killed or > injured in the making of this film" However, Beech Kig Air 300, N622DC had a > really bad day at the office!! Man did they trash that poor old gal. > Anyway, was a good day to see a movie and a lousy day to fly biplanes, Oh > well. Hope all is well with all of you. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 29, 2001
From: John Vormbaum <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: THE MOVIES
Well, We saw Planet of the Apes tonight. Fabulous makeup, and the plot was nothing more/less than you'd expect. I have to give credit to the actors for their efforts in mimicking Ape behavior. Kinda fun to watch. As far as the flying portions, Mark Wahlberg is such a fine pilot that he entered rainforest jungle at a shallow angle at perhaps 300kts and received not a scrape (pure luck missing all those big tree trunks I guess).....and then repeated the same feat later in the movie, only this time on concrete. Only thing I can think, the little spacecraft he was flying must have been made by Aero Design & Engineering... Capt. Jimbob, I SWEAR I filled out & sent my flyin application on Friday (woohoo!) and will be flying up with the rest of the Commander fighter wing who will be able to make it from the SF bay area. Cheers to all, /J ----- Original Message ----- From: <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com> To: Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 8:05 PM Subject: THE MOVIES > HI KIDS > > I just got back from the new Jurassic Park 111, I thought it was > great movie but I think I will lock the Iguana in the galley before I go to > bed tonight!! I can happily report that "no Twin Commanders were killed or > injured in the making of this film" However, Beech Kig Air 300, N622DC had a > really bad day at the office!! Man did they trash that poor old gal. > Anyway, was a good day to see a movie and a lousy day to fly biplanes, Oh > well. Hope all is well with all of you. jb > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 29, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Ins.
Mr. Tillman, Lost your number. How's about sending it to me ? Allen P.S. have the specs. for Lucille for ypur clients. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 29, 2001
From: Michael Pidek <pidekmc(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Insurable
Milt, Where did you go for training? >From: Rodd Browne <DC8F(at)worldnet.att.net> >To: Milt Concannon <mdcmd@ms-online.com>, Commander Chat > >Subject: Re: Insurable >Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 15:49:00 -0400 > >Way to go Milt!!!! > >rodd > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Milt Concannon > To: Commander Chat > Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 11:47 AM > Subject: Insurable > > > Just finished ground and simulator school and now am insured. > What a pain but in retrospect it was quite a valuable experience. > Barring mechanical difficulties or absolutely horrible weather look >forwrd to seeing many of you at HIO. > > Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 29, 2001
From: Milt <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Flight Sim
Downloaded Nikki's 680flp and 685 for flitesim last night and flew th #$%$ out of them. They fly much better than the stock aircraft that came with the program. Cant wait until he finishes the newer version of the 685. Those of you who saw Jurassic Park only thought that was a T Rex that the King Air hit. It was really Big AL after a jug of moonshine. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 29, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Lucille
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 29, 2001
From: John Vormbaum <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: Lucille
Big Al, She's mighty purty! /J ----- Original Message ----- From: "Allen Reed" <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com> To: Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 4:13 PM Subject: Lucille > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 29, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Lucille
Thanks! I think so too. Allen >From: "Nico van Niekerk" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com> >To: "Allen Reed" , > >Subject: Re: Lucille >Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 20:54:12 -0700 > >A thing of beauty. >Nico > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com> >To: >Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 4:13 PM >Subject: Lucille > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 29, 2001
From: Diana Talpos-Reed <drreed(at)charter.net>
Subject: Lucille
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 29, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Lucille
Hey Gang,have 2 more shot to show ya'll soon. ALLEN ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 29, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Lucille
Hey Gang, trust me,I had to send that one on her sight,Much easier than mine. AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 29, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: MORE ATTENDEES
HI KIDS................. Just got off the phone with Stan Perkins. He and his dad plan to attend the gathering. Stan learned to fly in a twin Commander. No, I don't mean got his multi in one, He got his Private ticket in one. He had a ME license before he had his SE rating!! Is that cool or what?? His dad owned several Commanders including a couple of 680Es and a 680W. Sadly, they sold all the airplanes some time ago but Stan is now looking to buy a Commander again. Sometimes this job is just to much fun!! Hope you all had a great weekend. Great Pix of Lucille!! jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 30, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: More Pictures of Lucille
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 30, 2001
From: Randy Sharp <sharp.r(at)apple.com>
Subject: Re: MORE ATTENDEES
Just returned from Campbell River BC (salmon fishing ie http://www.obmg.com/) and Whistler Mtn resort so I stopped in at KHIO for customs clearance on the return. Visited Aero Air so Jeff showed me a beautiful renaissance of a 690A just about finished and a real nice 1000 in the hanger having rework. Hard IFR with lots of heavy rain at 11K (just below the freezing level), sure cleaned my aircraft off! What happened to the nice summer wx? btw I now have lots of salmon, so I'm going to have a big barbecue with all of this fresh fish. (Maybe I'll bring some up to the fly-in) Randy YOURTCFG(at)aol.com said: >HI KIDS................. > Just got off the phone with Stan Perkins. He and his dad plan >to attend the gathering. Stan learned to fly in a twin Commander. No, I >don't mean got his multi in one, He got his Private ticket in one. He had a >ME license before he had his SE rating!! Is that cool or what?? His dad >owned several Commanders including a couple of 680Es and a 680W. >Sadly, they sold all the airplanes some time ago but Stan is now looking to >buy a Commander again. Sometimes this job is just to much fun!! Hope you >all had a great weekend. Great Pix of Lucille!! jb > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 31, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: RICHARD THOMPSON
HI RICHARD....... I have misplaced you email address, could you please contact me, Thanks jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 31, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: stranded in Tulsa....
Well, it seems as though I've turned into a flightless waterfowl. My Viking's annual is going to run long due to a failed turbo and the chances of me having a Commander to fly to HIO look slim. Anyone passing near Tulsa, OK on their way to HIO that would like two passengers and some help with fuel please let me know! I'll work my schedule to accomodate. Milt? Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 31, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Miss August!
Another month gone and a new "Commander of the month" online. Welcome the beautiful Miss August 2001! Who's next? I need YOU to supply the COTM section. I can't even come close to affording to purchase a new airplane each month just to keep a web site active! :-) Paul Reason - need pics and text from you and Urs for Miss Sept. Come on all you procrastinators - take a few minutes and get me some pictures and a short writeup about yourself and your airplane! Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 31, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: CALIFORNIA RIDE??
HI KIDS......... There is also a father/Son team looking for a ride the HIO from San Diego or somewhere in CA. Anybody?? jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 31, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: stranded in Tulsa....
In a message dated 7/31/01 5:38:26 PM Pacific Daylight Time, chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com writes: > TERMITES ???jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 31, 2001
From: Rodd Browne <DC8F(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Miss August!
Chris, As long as you don't need interior pics, (mine needs help) I'll have a "new paint" pic for you in August. Standby rodd ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Schuermann" <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com> To: Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 9:46 PM Subject: Miss August! > Another month gone and a new "Commander of the month" online. > Welcome the beautiful Miss August 2001! > > Who's next? I need YOU to supply the COTM section. I can't > even come close to affording to purchase a new airplane each > month just to keep a web site active! :-) > > Paul Reason - need pics and text from you and Urs for Miss Sept. > > Come on all you procrastinators - take a few minutes and get > me some pictures and a short writeup about yourself and your > airplane! > > Chris > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: COM
THANKS CHRIS!!!!!!!!!!!! Great story and photos of Milts airplane. Maybe you could do a double feature and show his new ride, the 685, next month?? I really appreciate you taking the time to post this. Come on guys, this is your chance to share your Commander with us so send the info to Chris. I am looking forward to meeting Milt and Gail this month. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: FIRE AND THE 685
HI KIDS.................... I had a nice conversation with Ken Molson of Aero Air last week. We have a lot in common (we have both built a homebuilt airplane and we both like boats, he is building one of those too) He is a great guy and you will be treated to a siminar session with him. He doesn't have a lot of good things to say about the 685. Aero Air sold 5 new ones and they all crashed. I asked him why?? Without hesitation he said "fire." It seems the fuel lines are routed near the turbos and because of the heat, age very quickly. Worse, when they fail, they spray fuel on the turbo with predictable results. Of the 5 lost airplanes, only one actually lost the wing. The others were not able to fly on the remaining engine (one was well over gross) "So why not just replace the fuel lines every 100hr or at each annual insp?" I asked. "I think that would have saved all 5 of these airplanes" he said. So, I challenge all of you 685 owners to remove and replace the fuel lines NOW! It cant cost that much and will eliminate the single largest cause of engine shut downs suffered by the fleet. Just thought you should know. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Norwegian 680FL - salvage
Remember the post to our email net last week about a Norwegian 680FL? Well, Jean Pierre has sent me photos of this former Commander. I say former because the wings have been sawed off at the roots, fuselage appears to have been sawed off behind the wings as well. From the photos, it appears there are some parts that may be salvageable, including control surfaces and landing gear. I have email Jean Pierre back to find out if the engines are available. Will let the list know. Meanwhile, if anyone is looking for parts, this specimen would have to be containerized and shipped out. In fact, it resides in this man's garden, not an airport. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Norwegian salvage - correction
Hello all, In looking over the photos, it's a 680- FLP. Sir Barry probably already told us that. Cockpit is torn up, but the panel template is intact with many flight instruments. They've been in the elements for who knows how long, but the following are still installed: Basic "6 pack" flight instruments copilot side VSI and horizon Pressurization controller Throttle quadrant, intact. Landing gear control box Pilot side control column and yoke The tail was cut off just aft of the baggage area. Nose gear intact, photo shows one main landing gear retracted in a nacelle, lying on the ground. Several control surfaces and (I think) flaps -- with vines growing around them. Did not see cabin supercharger / air cycle machine. If the engines are around, that could mean hydraulic pumps (300 psi variety) and Simmonds units. This is not a fixer-upper, unless you are really bored. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: AC560F Mr. RPM
Yesterday I spoke with Kevin Riecker at Banyan Air Service in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. (Sorry, "Fladah," as it's spoken there) Here's the info: IO-720s were hung on the airframe per Mr. RPM's STC about 9 months ago. The project is being held up due to lack of money (this is the first time this has ever happened in aviation). The owner had some really terrific ideas for this package, but some of those ideas have cost time and money. 84" propellors are awaiting field approval. (I'd sure love to see that take to the air, but the fastest way may be back to 80" props>0 Starter engage lights. Cooling blast tubes on the vacuum pumps. A new design oil cooler located in the aft nacelle. Along with those, Banyan has done a mini-Renaissance, in that all cables, hoses, and components have been overhauled. It's rumored to have $100K in avionics, with Gamins 430s. So that's the story up to the minute. It exists, it's not flying due to lack of bucks and may be for sale. Oh, and if you have to ask, you can't afford it. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Norwegian 680FL - salvage
MAKES ME WANT TO CRY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 2001
From: Barry Collman <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Norwegian salvage - correction
Keith & Gang! No, it is/was a Model 680FL. Serial 680FL-1355-34, registered in Norway as LN-LMM. Can the Pressurisation Controller be mistaken for something else? I note the cabin supercharger / air cycle machine couldn't be seen and are they only on the Pressurised Models? Are the cockpit DV windows visible? The pressurized pistons either had no DV window, or one with a much wider surround. Could you forward the pics to me for a 'butcher's'. (Butcher's hook = rhyming slang for look). I am really bored - so may go for it. See you all in about 15 years time! Best Regards, Barry ----- Original Message ----- From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 10:58 PM Subject: Norwegian salvage - correction Hello all, In looking over the photos, it's a 680- FLP. Sir Barry probably already told us that. Cockpit is torn up, but the panel template is intact with many flight instruments. They've been in the elements for who knows how long, but the following are still installed: Basic "6 pack" flight instruments copilot side VSI and horizon Pressurization controller Throttle quadrant, intact. Landing gear control box Pilot side control column and yoke The tail was cut off just aft of the baggage area. Nose gear intact, photo shows one main landing gear retracted in a nacelle, lying on the ground. Several control surfaces and (I think) flaps -- with vines growing around them. Did not see cabin supercharger / air cycle machine. If the engines are around, that could mean hydraulic pumps (300 psi variety) and Simmonds units. This is not a fixer-upper, unless you are really bored. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Norwegian salvage - correction
How about the windshields?? jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <tylorh(at)sound.net>
Subject: Re: Norwegian salvage -?
Sir Berry, How many Euros per Kilo is aluminum going for over there?? I saw a sign over here at $.25/ lbs for beer cans. Decota Aero has two 685s with out engines for sale. www.dakotaaero.com <http://www.dakotaaero.com/> IF you hang two Turbo V-8 engines from you John Deer tractor pull tractor on you Twin Commander, are you a Red Neck Commander Pilot? Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 -----Original Message----- From: Barry Collman [mailto:barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 6:01 PM To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Subject: Re: Norwegian salvage - correction Keith & Gang! No, it is/was a Model 680FL. Serial 680FL-1355-34, registered in Norway as LN-LMM. Can the Pressurisation Controller be mistaken for something else? I note the cabin supercharger / air cycle machine couldn't be seen and are they only on the Pressurised Models? Are the cockpit DV windows visible? The pressurized pistons either had no DV window, or one with a much wider surround. Could you forward the pics to me for a 'butcher's'. (Butcher's hook = rhyming slang for look). I am really bored - so may go for it. See you all in about 15 years time! Best Regards, Barry ----- Original Message ----- From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <mailto:CloudCraft(at)aol.com> To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 10:58 PM Subject: Norwegian salvage - correction Hello all, In looking over the photos, it's a 680- FLP. Sir Barry probably already told us that. Cockpit is torn up, but the panel template is intact with many flight instruments. They've been in the elements for who knows how long, but the following are still installed: Basic "6 pack" flight instruments copilot side VSI and horizon Pressurization controller Throttle quadrant, intact. Landing gear control box Pilot side control column and yoke The tail was cut off just aft of the baggage area. Nose gear intact, photo shows one main landing gear retracted in a nacelle, lying on the ground. Several control surfaces and (I think) flaps -- with vines growing around them. Did not see cabin supercharger / air cycle machine. If the engines are around, that could mean hydraulic pumps (300 psi variety) and Simmonds units. This is not a fixer-upper, unless you are really bored. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 2001
From: Milt <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: jbs note on 685 fires
OK Im replacing the hoses. Do I have any riders left to HIO JB any statistics on these accidents where when weather etc???????? Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Norwegian salvage - correction
In a message dated 08/01/01 16:02:03 Pacific Daylight Time, YOURTCFG writes: > How about the windshields?? They're there. Can't tell the condition from the photos. I can upload one of the photos, but I think it would depress everyone. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Norwegian salvage - correction
In a message dated 08/01/01 16:10:38 Pacific Daylight Time, barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk writes: > No, it is/was a Model 680FL. Serial 680FL-1355-34, registered in Norway as > Ah ha! Imagine my double take when I saw small side windows, the large pilot's D. V. window and what I can only determine is a pressurization controller in the panel. Lack of cabin supercharger and air cycle macine may be due to early scavenging. No shots of the aft top fuselage to see air scoop -- but you'll like the Chamberlain nose, Sir Barry. Now, most of my call is based on the so-called cabin pressure controller in the pilot's sub panel and a set of rocker switches not normally seen in an FL. I can't imagine what else this stuff could be. Do we have a mystery ship on our hands? If nothing else, you can cobble it together for Harrison Ford to blow up in his next movie. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Norwegian salvage -?
In a message dated 08/01/01 16:57:34 Pacific Daylight Time, tylorh(at)sound.net writes: > IF you hang two Turbo V-8 engines from you John Deer tractor pull tractor on > Depends. Is it done under an STC? If so, then probably not. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <tylorh(at)sound.net>
Subject: Re: Norwegian salvage -?
Not yet, but we are trying. Very trying. Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 -----Original Message----- From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com [mailto:CloudCraft(at)aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 8:41 PM To: tylorh(at)sound.net Cc: commanderchat@c2-tech.com Subject: Re: Norwegian salvage -? In a message dated 08/01/01 16:57:34 Pacific Daylight Time, tylorh(at)sound.net writes: IF you hang two Turbo V-8 engines from you John Deer tractor pull tractor on you Twin Commander, are you a Red Neck Commander Pilot? Depends. Is it done under an STC? If so, then probably not. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <tylorh(at)sound.net>
Subject: Re: jbs note on 685 fires
Milt, I have not heard from Big Al yet. I have sent my money and I would love a ride. AVGAS at KOJC is $2.29/ gallon as of today, self-service. I will pay and pump it. Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 -----Original Message----- From: Milt [mailto:mdcmd@ms-online.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 6:49 PM To: Commander Chat Subject: jbs note on 685 fires OK Im replacing the hoses. Do I have any riders left to HIO JB any statistics on these accidents where when weather etc???????? Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 2001
From: Rodd Browne <DC8F(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: flight controls
Hey Guys, Would anyone have a copy of the procedures for balancing flight controls prior to re-installation after painting?? Model 560E. My manuals don't address this requirement. Thanks all... rodd ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 2001
From: Paul Odum <calnet01(at)gte.net>
Subject: Re: flight controls
Rodd, There is just rigging procedures. Paul Rodd Browne wrote: > Hey Guys, Would anyone have a copy of the procedures for balancing > flight controls prior to re-installation after painting?? Model > 560E. My manuals don't address this requirement. Thanks all... rodd ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 2001
From: Rodd Browne <DC8F(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: balancing
Thanks Paul, Are you saying that there are no procedures for balancing flight controls in this situation?? I found the rigging procedures but no balancing. rodd ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 02, 2001
From: Bow <w.bow(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: flight controls
Same number on each wing? bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: Rodd Browne To: Commander Chat Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 12:09 AM Subject: flight controls Hey Guys, Would anyone have a copy of the procedures for balancing flight controls prior to re-installation after painting?? Model 560E. My manuals don't address this requirement. Thanks all... rodd ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 02, 2001
From: Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk <Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Norwegian salvage - correction
Hi Keith & Gang! This 680FL Commander was owned by a company called Fjellanger-Wideroe A/S in Norway. They've presently got another couple, a 690B and a 690C, and also had a 680F at one time. Their operations are centred around aerial survey/photography, and I'm certain that this 680FL would have had a camera installation. Now, I don't know how all that gear worked, but I believe some had a hydraulically operated door to the camera hatch, while others had electrically operated ones. Steven Reid at Downtown Airpark is the real expert on these. They've probably installed more cameras in Commanders than all the others put together. So, could what appears to be a Pressurisation Controller and a set of weird rocker switches, be connected with the operation of camera or survey equipment? Anybody any ideas? Very Best Regards, Barry Collman CloudCraft@ao l.com To: barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk cc: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com 02/08/2001 Subject: Re: Norwegian salvage - correction 02:34 In a message dated 08/01/01 16:10:38 Pacific Daylight Time, barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk writes: No, it is/was a Model 680FL. Serial 680FL-1355-34, registered in Norway as LN-LMM Ah ha! Imagine my double take when I saw small side windows, the large pilot's D. V. window and what I can only determine is a pressurization controller in the panel. Lack of cabin supercharger and air cycle macine may be due to early scavenging. No shots of the aft top fuselage to see air scoop -- but you'll like the Chamberlain nose, Sir Barry. Now, most of my call is based on the so-called cabin pressure controller in the pilot's sub panel and a set of rocker switches not normally seen in an FL. I can't imagine what else this stuff could be. Do we have a mystery ship on our hands? If nothing else, you can cobble it together for Harrison Ford to blow up in his next movie. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 02, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: off topic - hobby: Steam engines
Sorry for the non-av post... Don't know how many of fellow Commander enthusiasts are heavily involved in fixing their own airplanes, but I suspect that more than one of you has made a few parts from time to time. One of my hobbies is detailed, small scale steam engines and scale "hit-and miss" gasoline engines. From my experience, Stuart Ltd in England is the finest vendor of small steam engine kits. Although you can order completed engines, the fun part is building your own from raw casting sets. All work can be done on a small lathe but a mill is nice. Actually getting the kits has been a bit of a problem, but there is now a nice retired couple in Little Rock Ark that is importing and stocking the kits. http://www.mindspring.com/~minimachine/ If anyone is looking for a fun several-week winter project, this is a pretty cool way to pass the time! Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 02, 2001
From: Peter Eshleman <peshleman(at)frederickmd.com>
Subject: Re: Commander for sale
Nico, Here are pics and specs for the Commander. Let me know what you think. Call or e-mail me if you need more information or have any questions. Pete Eshleman (301) 831-8334 Home (301) 980-2636 Cell (301) 874-2963 Fax peshleman(at)frederickmd.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 02, 2001
From: garyloff <n27kb(at)erols.com>
Subject: Re: jbs note on 685 fires
We have a fuel club at Potomac Airfield that your FBOs might be interested. The cost of membership is $18.00 monthly and the price of fuel is $1.69. The club has hundreds of members from all over. The benefit to use is the stable flow of income regardless of the crappy months and the benefit to the a/c owners... . If anyone is iinterested in further details let me know. G ----- Original Message ----- From: Tylor Hall To: Milt ; Commander Chat Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 10:41 PM Subject: RE: jbs note on 685 fires Milt, I have not heard from Big Al yet. I have sent my money and I would love a ride. AVGAS at KOJC is $2.29/ gallon as of today, self-service. I will pay and pump it. Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 -----Original Message----- From: Milt [mailto:mdcmd@ms-online.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 6:49 PM To: Commander Chat Subject: jbs note on 685 fires OK Im replacing the hoses. Do I have any riders left to HIO JB any statistics on these accidents where when weather etc???????? Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 02, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: EVEN MORE ATTNDEES
HI KIDS.................. More good news. My wife tells me that the mail today contained registration forms for several more attendees. Ted Shaul (sp) will be attending with his Shrike as well as Mark Poulson (sorry about the spelling Mark) and his 685 from SC!!! Mark will be traveling with his instructor and their girlfriends (hope they aren't married)!! That makes 3 685s in attendance, pretty cool! jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 02, 2001
From: AOPA ePilot Newsletter <aopa_news(at)aopa.org>
Subject: AOPA ePilot -- Vol. 3, Issue 31
AOPA ePilot--Vol. 3, Issue 31 Departments Inside AOPA On Capitol Hill Airport Support Network Quiz Me! 2001 Bonanza Sweepstakes ePilot Calendar Weekend Weather Airplane makes successful HITS flight Superior to market diesel aircraft engines Competition heats up in jet market Don't close Ohio airport, AOPA tells candidates Volume 3, Issue 31 August 3, 2001 GA News MOONEY DECLARES BANKRUPTCY Ten days after Chris Dopp resigned his post as Mooney Aircraft Corporation's president and CEO, the company filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Papers were filed July 27 in Texas. Mooney's day-to-day affairs are now being handled by Michael McConnell, Mooney's senior vice president of strategic planning; Tom Bowen, vice president of engineering; and Mike Baldridge, vice president of operations. Paul Dopp, who owned Mooney in the early 1970s, remains as chairman. McConnell said at AirVenture 2001 in Oshkosh, "This is our opportunity to finally right the ship," and emphasized that Mooney will continue to support Mooney customers and their airplanes. Funding for continued operations has been secured, the company will operate as a debtor in possession, and plans are reportedly in the works to rebuild the company and produce airplanes. A search is under way for a new president and CEO. AIRPLANE MAKES SUCCESSFUL HITS FLIGHT Avidyne Corporation announced the successful demonstration flight of its Highway in the Sky (HITS) technology last Friday. The 30-minute flight in a Lancair Columbia 400 departed EAA AirVenture in Oshkosh and flew a GPS approach into Fond du Lac Airport before returning for a VFR approach back into Oshkosh. The flight was conducted entirely with reference to the HITS display symbology developed by Avidyne as part of the Advanced General Aviation Transport Experiments (AGATE) program. "The HITS system was so easy to fly, even my 7-year-old grandson could have done it," said NASA's Sam Venerri, who acted as pilot on the mission. "It is easy to see how this technology can reduce training time for new pilots and increase competency of low-time pilots in IFR conditions." CIRRUS ENHANCES SR20 AT NO EXTRA CHARGE Cirrus Design announced a 100-pound gross weight increase, to 3,000 pounds, for the SR20 aircraft. Company officials said the increase improves utility by bumping up the useful load to 950 pounds. The airplane will also have a new look with the installation of an ultrabright high-intensity discharge (HID) landing light, pioneered on the SR22, in the lower cowl. Other options include traffic information for the avionics system and some interior refinements. No change in price is anticipated. The company plans to offer retrofit kits for the 140 SR20s already delivered. See the Web site. SUPERIOR TO MARKET AIRCRAFT DIESEL ENGINES Superior Air Parts Inc. has been named as the exclusive sales representative for two aircraft engines that run on jet fuel. The engines are produced by Thielert Aircraft Engines of Lichtenstein. Both engines, the TAE 110 and 125, are four-cylinder, four-valve turbodiesels that operate on Jet-A fuel. The TAE 110 has been certified in Europe while the TAE 125 has accumulated more than 1,000 hours in a Piper Cherokee. Plans are to install the 125-hp engine in a Cessna 172 later this year. Both engines feature 3,000-hour TBOs and full authority digital engine control (FADEC). COMPETITION HEATS UP IN PERSONAL JET MARKET The competition in personal jets is getting tighter. McCotter Aviation LLC, maker of the Maverick TwinJet kitplane, is pursuing certification of a new aircraft, the MC 2400. The six-place composite airframe is to be powered by two jet engines. The company is planning to achieve a maximum cruise speed of 413 knots with a range of more than 1,500 nm. Company officials are currently discussing engine options with manufacturers. The jet is expected to sell for $1.5 million. McCotter plans to receive certification in 2003. See the Web site. AIR FORCE SET TO CONTINUE SEARCH FOR TRAINERS An environmental impact study has found there will be no deleterious effects from noise on the Colorado Springs area, allowing the U.S. Air Force Academy's search for new trainer aircraft to continue. Plans to start a flight training program were put on hold when environmental concerns were raised last year. The academy, based in Colorado Springs, has agreed to realign training routes and select quiet trainers to mitigate possible noise problems. The Air Force will select a contractor and provide funds to the winning bidder to provide initial flight training to Academy cadets. The contract will be awarded by January 2002, and training will begin no later than June 2002. See AOPA Online for more EAA AirVenture coverage, or for daily news updates. Inside AOPA FAA MAKES RNAV CHARTING HIGH PRIORITY Pressure from AOPA and RTCA Inc. (a not-for-profit corporation that advises the federal government) for charted area navigation (RNAV) routes has resulted in the FAA's elevating the RNAV rulemaking to one of the agency's highest priorities. RNAV rulemaking will now receive internal FAA support from technical experts, attorneys, and economists needed to develop rules. The FAA team met this week to begin development of work plans and a timeline. AOPA is pleased that the FAA responded to its multiyear effort to secure charted RNAV routes, and has encouraged the FAA to commit allocated resources to making sure the rulemaking process does not impede progress of route charting. For more, see AOPA Online. DON'T CLOSE OHIO AIRPORT, AOPA TELLS CANDIDATES AOPA is warning mayoral candidates in Cleveland, Ohio, to keep their hands off Burke Lakefront Airport. "AOPA will work diligently to defeat any attempts to close this valuable community resource," wrote AOPA President Phil Boyer in a letter to all the candidates. "With the recent focus on the need for additional airport and runway capacity, closing Burke (a designated FAA reliever airport) could have a detrimental impact on delays at Cleveland's Hopkins International Airport. We doubt the FAA will be willing to accept the negative consequences associated with allowing Burke Lakefront to close." At least five candidates running for mayor of Cleveland want to close the airport and develop the property or turn it into a lakefront park. For more, see AOPA Online. FAA TO ISSUE FINAL RULE FOR REPAIR STATIONS Next week, the FAA will publish its first major revision to FAR Part 145, which covers approved repair stations. "While the FAA responded to many of AOPA's concerns that should make implementation of the final rule less costly than the previous version, there is still going to be an impact on the cost of maintenance resulting from this rule," said Andy Cebula, AOPA senior vice president of government and technical affairs. AOPA submitted formal comments to the FAA in December 1999 citing many needed changes to the proposed rule that would reduce the rule's economic impact without compromising safety. And last week, AOPA presented oral arguments to the U.S. Office of Management and Budget as to the rule's overly burdensome economic impact on small repair stations. AOPA CONTINUES NANTUCKET AIRSPACE FIGHT AOPA is continuing to oppose the FAA's proposed new Class C airspace around Nantucket Memorial Airport on Nantucket Island in Massachusetts. The FAA has scheduled two informal airspace meetings for August 20 and 21 to gather input from pilots on the proposal. AOPA encourages local pilots to attend. "The FAA refuses to consider simpler, less restrictive options," said Melissa K. Bailey, AOPA vice president of air traffic services. "Almost a year ago, AOPA proposed a solution that would have cost the taxpayer next to nothing and could have been implemented immediately. We were ignored." Because of the summer seasonal peak in air traffic on the island, the FAA wants the current Nantucket Class D airspace changed to the more restrictive, radar-based Class C operation. For more, see AOPA Online. Changing your mailing or e-mail addresses? Click here to update. On Capitol Hill CONGRESS MAY PRESSURE CHICAGO TO SAVE MEIGS As a direct result of AOPA legislative efforts, Congress may step in to save Chicago's Meigs Field. After AOPA met with Illinois Sen. Peter Fitzgerald, he added an amendment to the Department of Transportation fiscal 2002 appropriations bill. The Senate passed the bill Wednesday night. The amendment states that area reliever and general aviation airports like Meigs must be preserved and utilized as part of a plan to solve congestion at Chicago's O'Hare International Airport. Bill Deere, AOPA's senior vice president of legislative affairs, helped craft the amendment language. Meanwhile, Illinois Gov. George Ryan announced that he will present an alternative to Chicago's current O'Hare plans which includes extending the life of Meigs Field. It is slated to close in February 2002. For more, see AOPA Online. REPORT INDICATES PROBLEMS IN SHOOT-DOWN POLICY The Bush administration will release this week the State Department's report on its investigation of the U.S.-Peru drug interdiction program and the April 20 incident in which a civilian aircraft was shot down in Peru by a Peruvian Air Force fighter jet, The Washington Post reported Tuesday. The State Department inquiry "characterizes the program as having limited U.S. oversight and having evolved over the years into lax adherence to procedures by both the United States and Peru," said sources familiar with the report. After the April 20 incident, AOPA President Phil Boyer was invited to submit testimony for the House criminal justice, drug policy, and human resources subcommittee hearing on U.S. drug Interdiction efforts in South America. Boyer condemned the use of deadly force against civilian aircraft. See AOPA Online. Airport Support Network AOPA started the Airport Support Network to provide a coordinated effort to reduce antiairport sentiment. ASN volunteers keep AOPA headquarters abreast of political and public opinion developments that may affect their airports. They attend public meetings dealing with airport matters and report to AOPA on the proceedings. ASN volunteers help promote local airport activities to enhance the airport's public image. They also act as the AOPA liaison with local pilot associations, user groups, airport advisory commissions, and airport officials. Does this sound like something your airport has? If not, your airport needs an ASN volunteer. Below are just a few airports in your area where an ASN volunteer could make a difference. ASN is looking for volunteers at several airports in California, including MMH, 068, MYV, MHV, 027, 037, and PSP. To learn more about the Airport Support Network, visit AOPA Online. Quiz Me! Heres a question asked by an AOPA member last week of our AOPA technical specialists. Test your knowledge. Question: It is common knowledge that most small airports with control towers are Class D airspace. However, when the tower closes this airspace changes to either Class E Surface Area or Class G. What determines the change to either Class E Surface Area or Class G? Answer: The Airport/Facilities Directory (A/FD) shows which type of airspace will exist at an airport after the closing of a tower facility. The airspace determination depends on the weather observation facilities on the field. In order to qualify for a surfaced-based Class E airspace the following conditions must exist: There must be a federally certified weather observer or system (AWOS, ASOS, etc.) on the field; this observer or system must have the ability to report to ATC via phone line or other means; and the airport must meet the above requirements after the tower ceases to operate. Otherwise, it will revert to Class G airspace. Got a technical question for AOPA specialists? Call 800/872-2672 or e-mail to inforequest(at)aopa.org. Send comments on our Quiz Me! questions to epilot(at)aopa.org. AOPA Sweepstakes Bonanza Update After its first public appearance at EAA AirVenture in Oshkosh to the delight of thousands, the 2001 AOPA Sweepstakes Bonanza is in Ohio having its new leather installed. See our latest project update on AOPA Online. On The Road To Expo Seeing live product demonstrations is one of the many reasons to attend AOPA Expo 2001. That's right, you can actually see how the products perform before you buy. To get a glimpse of what to expect from November 8 through 10 in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, see AOPA Online. ePilot Calendar WEEKEND FLYING DESTINATIONS Cape May, New Jersey. Airfest 2001 takes place August 11 at Cape May County Airport (WWD). Call 609/886-8787 for event information. Moffett Field, California. NASA's e-Air Expo takes place August 11 and 12. Call 650/604-2162 for event information. FLYING DESTINATIONS IN YOUR AREA NAPA, CALIFORNIA. A Friday dinner and Saturday open house take place August 10 and 11 at Napa Airport (APC). Call 707/259-1868 for event information. For more airport details, see AOPA's Airport Directory Online. For more events, see Aviation Calendar of Events ASF SAFETY SEMINARS The next AOPA ASF Safety Seminars are scheduled in Rockford, Michigan, and Little Rock, Arkansas, August 13 ("Fuel Awareness"); Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, and Memphis, Tennessee, August 14 ("Fuel Awareness"); Anderson, Indiana, and Murfreesboro, Tennessee, August 15 ("Fuel Awareness"); Chattanooga, Tennessee, August 16 ("Fuel Awareness"); and Maryville, Tennessee, August 17 ("Fuel Awareness"). See AOPA Online for more information. ASF FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR REFRESHER CLINICS (All clinics start at 7:30 a.m.) The next AOPA Air Safety Foundation Flight Instructor Refresher Clinics are scheduled in Long Beach, California; Boulder, Colorado; and Reno, Nevada, August 11 and 12. For the Flight Instructor Refresher Clinic schedule, see AOPA Online. ASF PINCH-HITTER GROUND-SCHOOL COURSES (Pinch-Hitter courses start at 9:30 a.m.) The next Pinch-Hitter Ground School will take place August 12 in Reno, Nevada. For more Pinch-Hitter courses, see AOPA Online. For comments on calendar items or to make submissions, contact Julie S. Walker at julie.walker(at)aopa.org. Contacting ePilot Got news? Contact ePilot at nate.ferguson(at)aopa.org. Due to the large volume of mail received, we regret that we are unable to individually answer all correspondence. Having difficulty using this service? Visit the ePilot Frequently Asked Questions now at AOPA Online or write to epilot(at)aopa.org. You are currently subscribed as NAME-NICO VAN NIEKERK eMail Address-NICO(at)CYBERSUPERSTORE.COM. Changing your mailing or e-mail addresses? Click here to update. To UNSUBSCRIBE: Click here Unsubscribe, then hit the "Send" button. Do not include a message. To SUBSCRIBE: visit http://www.aopa.org/members/epilot.html. AOPA, 421 Aviation Way, Frederick, MD 21701 Tel: 800/USA-AOPA or 301/695-2000 Copyright 2001. Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association. Advertisers ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 03, 2001
From: David L. Cummings <fishnpilot(at)mediaone.net>
Subject: Re: Plane for sale
why yes, you are very perceptive.....here is the spec sheet and please feel free to call my home anytime, @ 763-559-8028. if you have the controller or aero trader around, it is in those as well as TAP. dave ----- Original Message ----- From: Nico van Niekerk To: fishnpilot(at)mediaone.net Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 12:28 PM Subject: Plane for sale Please send specs on your twin for sale. It sounds like a Howard. Thanks Nico van Niekerk President & CEO CyberSuperStore, Inc. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 03, 2001
From: David L. Cummings <fishnpilot(at)mediaone.net>
Subject: Re: Plane for sale
and here are pics ----- Original Message ----- From: Nico van Niekerk To: fishnpilot(at)mediaone.net Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 12:28 PM Subject: Plane for sale Please send specs on your twin for sale. It sounds like a Howard. Thanks Nico van Niekerk President & CEO CyberSuperStore, Inc. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 03, 2001
From: w.bow <w.bow(at)att.net>
Subject: hardware
I am trying to find some(50) 1/4-28X3/4 SS Flat Head Machine screws.(MS24693-C296 I think). No luck with Aircraft Spruce or Skybolt. Any thoughts? bilbo ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 03, 2001
From: TILLMAN333(at)aol.com <TILLMAN333(at)aol.com>
Subject: Part Needed
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 03, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: WORKING HARD FOR YOU!
HI KIDS................................. Oh what I wont do, the sacrifices I wont make for the TCFG and you. I had to check out the arrangements at Friday Harbor today so at great expense and personal risk, I climbed into the left seat of triple 2 for a trip over the water. Blasting out of BFI on a downwind departure (at or below 800 feet and close in) then climbing past the space needle and points north. It was a kinda crappy day but VFR below the clouds. Got to FH at about 6pm. Nice approach over the marina and town and on to the 4000 ft strip. A quick taxi to parking and a brisk 10 minute walk to the waterfront and the restaurant, "The Downrigger" I figured that it would not be right to just make a reservation for our lunch on the 26th, I had better sample the cuisine. I orederd the Cod & chips with a bowl of chowder. The chowder was superb, more like a rich potato soup with lots of clams. This was served with a "mini loaf" of homemade bread and hand made garlic butter. When the Cod came, It was wonderful and so plentiful I couldn't eat it all!! Of course it didn't hurt that the view out the window was of the marina and the seaplane dock. Beavers and turbo Otters coming and going just outside the glass. Then, just as I was leaving, the Seattle State ferry came into dock just a 100 yards from the restaurant. The deep sound of the air horn as she docked was the perfect end to a great meal. Then it was a nice walk back to the airport and into the leather pilot seat of old triple 2. It was very late in the evening as I reached for the gear handle slipped the flap lever up. The weather had cleared some but still enough clouds to give the sitting sun a canvas to paint bright orange!! I climbed hard through the cloud bases at 3500 and was on top of the broken layer at 4000. I played in the cloud tops for a while and was monitoring 130.30, the seaplane freq. When I heard Mike, a Kenmore pilot and joined the chatter and found I was right above him!! I found a hole in the cloud deck and dived through. It didn't take long for us to find each other and I came up on his left wing. I stayed far enough away to not be "in formation" with him, he was on a 135 flight in a tubo Otter, they go pretty fast!! Back into the pattern at BFI on a long, straight in approach past the space needle and the Seattle waterfront. Past the aircraft carrier berthed downtown for "sea fair" and back to my parking place between the Nordstrom Hangar and the Boeing corporate hangar. A long hard day just to get things in order for all of you, what sacrifices I wont make!! Good night all, jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 03, 2001
From: res00rbl <res00rbl(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: WORKING HARD FOR YOU!
Thanks for the tremendous sacrifice, Jim Jim Jorgensen (Seattle) Oh what I wont do, the sacrifices I wont make for the TCFG and you ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 03, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: WORKING HARD FOR YOU!
In a message dated 08/03/01 22:06:35 Pacific Daylight Time, YOURTCFG(at)aol.com writes: > > A long hard day just to get things in order for all of you, what > sacrifices I wont make!! We can't thank you enough, Capt. Jimbob. Really. I'm sure you'll be forced into service like this again once or twice and when you are, know that we stand in silent awe of the sacrifices you make for us. It's also good to know that you're the kind of leader who wouldn't ask his troops to do anything that he wouldn't do himself. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 04, 2001
From: Milt Concannon <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Re: WORKING HARD FOR YOU!
Jimbob, Keep your health insurance up to date. If you continue to make these sacrifices for us and eat all that cholesterol youre going to need me and I aint cheap. Milt ----- Original Message ----- From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 11:58 PM Subject: WORKING HARD FOR YOU! HI KIDS................................. Oh what I wont do, the sacrifices I wont make for the TCFG and you. I ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 04, 2001
From: Milt Concannon <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Flyin
Capt Jimbob, If you have a minute in between sacrifices can you tell us where to go when we get there and what time Friday does this thing kick off? Also if there is a house of ill repute on the flyin agenda please dont go there and sample everything on the menu. It certainly would kill you and we would all feel bad knowing you did it for us. Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 04, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <tylorh(at)sound.net>
Subject: Re: hardware
Bow, Have you tried Genuine Aircraft Hardware Co. www.gen-aircraft-hardware.com I picked up their catalog at a show. In there they have NAS517 high strength countersunk screws in 1/4-28. This is a place that has just aviation grade bolts and aviation stuff. Sells direct. 888-247-2738 805-239-4871 FAX Monday -Fri. 7:30 am to 4:30 PM Pacific Time. I hope this helps. Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 -----Original Message----- From: w.bow [mailto:w.bow(at)att.net] Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 7:52 PM To: Commanderchat Subject: hardware I am trying to find some(50) 1/4-28X3/4 SS Flat Head Machine screws.(MS24693-C296 I think). No luck with Aircraft Spruce or Skybolt. Any thoughts? bilbo ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 05, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <thall5(at)kc.rr.com>
Subject: Here comes BARRY
Milt, I hope your new 685 is parked inside. Here comes Hurricane Barry. I think it is going to get wet down there. Is Al Reeds 680E parked inside?? Good luck, you are going to need it. If anyone of us can help, let us know. Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 05, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Here comes BARRY
Geez, and here I was looking at the subject line thinking you were talking about me. How egocentric of me . Having a great time with 680E flying the California coast. Will write a report when I get back down south. Did pass wingtips at about 200 yds separation with a nice looking 500B during arrival at Morris' place (Hayward). "Is there a prettier twin in the sky", asked the rhetorical one. Barry (I don't like having destructive things bearing my name) Hancock Barry Hancock Precision Flight Networks bdogltd(at)pacbell.net 949.300.5510 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 05, 2001
From: Milt Concannon <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Re: Here comes BARRY
Tyler , I think Als plane is in Tennessee even though he and his moving Van are at ground zero. Tried to call him earlier but no answer. My plane is in New Orleons getting some avionics work so I went over Friday night and tied her down on the Southwest side of a big hanger and locked tyhe controls. It looks like Barry is going in around Pensacola although the feeder bands are overhead and looking pretty glomy right now. Ill keep you posted if I get ahold of Al. Milt ----- Original Message ----- From: Tylor Hall To: Commanderchat@Skymaster. C2-Tech. Com ; Milt Concannon Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 9:44 AM Subject: Here comes BARRY Milt, I hope your new 685 is parked inside. Here comes Hurricane Barry. I think it is going to get wet down there. Is Al Reed's 680E parked inside?? Good luck, you are going to need it. If anyone of us can help, let us know. Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 05, 2001
From: Milt Concannon <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Re: Here comes BARRY
Earlier in the forecast Barry looked like he was coming ashore in Hancock county. The it would have been Barry Hancock as opposed to Sir Barry. ----- Original Message ----- From: Barry Hancock To: thall5(at)kc.rr.com ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com ; mdcmd(at)ms-online.com Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 4:50 PM Subject: Re: Here comes BARRY Geez, and here I was looking at the subject line thinking you were talking about me. How egocentric of me . Having a great time with 680E flying the California coast. Will write a report when I get back down south. Did pass wingtips at about 200 yds separation with a nice looking 500B during arrival at Morris' place (Hayward). "Is there a prettier twin in the sky", asked the rhetorical one. Barry (I don't like having destructive things bearing my name) Hancock Barry Hancock Precision Flight Networks bdogltd(at)pacbell.net 949.300.5510 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 05, 2001
From: Milt <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Barry
Storm watch for Mississippi was just cancelled. We are getting a little rain here in GPT. Barry is 170+ miles Southeast. Ft Walton beach FL is starting to see heavy winds and seas. Big Al was moving in to his new house in Pensacola Saturday. I havent been able to contact him by cellular or beeper. He usually answers promptly. Dont know if the towers are down or if hes still enroute. Ill try his wife in the AM and keep everyone posted. His computer is in the moving van and hes not connected. Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 06, 2001
From: Barry Collman <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Here comes BARRY
Streuth! I thought I was taking the blame for a minute! I will hit the USA, but it'll be later this month, and I certainly don't aim to cause trouble!! Very Best Regards, Barry C. ----- Original Message ----- From: Barry Hancock To: thall5(at)kc.rr.com ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com ; mdcmd(at)ms-online.com Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 4:50 PM Subject: Re: Here comes BARRY Geez, and here I was looking at the subject line thinking you were talking about me. How egocentric of me . Having a great time with 680E flying the California coast. Will write a report when I get back down south. Did pass wingtips at about 200 yds separation with a nice looking 500B during arrival at Morris' place (Hayward). "Is there a prettier twin in the sky", asked the rhetorical one. Barry (I don't like having destructive things bearing my name) Hancock Barry Hancock Precision Flight Networks bdogltd(at)pacbell.net 949.300.5510 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 06, 2001
From: Milt <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Barry
Well Barry turned out to be just a little wet fart. (the storm that is, not Barry Hancock) It went ashore well West of Big Als new home and even though I havent talked to him Im sure he's OK. You could actually scud run along the Florida panhandle coast this AM. Severe clear hear here in GPT. I suspect the Guys in Northern Florida and Georgia will see worse weather from Barry than we did. Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 06, 2001
From: JETPAUL(at)aol.com <JETPAUL(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Hurricane Barry
I talked to my mom this morning in Panama City, Fl. and she said Barry was not to bad. They had sustained winds of about 40 mph, and a few peak gusts of 70 mph. I was at work yesterday in the DC-9 and left TPA at noon going to PHL. I Got a good look at all the weather and the feeder bands that Barry was spinning off. By late afternoon yesterday our Captains were refusing to fly to Ft. Walton Beach, FL. The Metar was 45 knots gusting to 55 knots with Tornado warnings for the whole area. I talked to my best friend this morning who is a National Catastrophe Response Specialist for State Farm Insurance (if only they quoted airplanes!!) and he said they did NOT mobilize a CAT team in response to Barry because they had only 38 claims on the panhandle coast. God bless all and I'm glad everyone is O.K. Paul Reason ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 06, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: Hurricane Barry
Thanks for the updates, Chief. Here in Southern California we wondered for a minute what tornado warnings were. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: <JETPAUL(at)aol.com> To: ; Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 8:14 AM Subject: Re: Hurricane Barry > I talked to my mom this morning in Panama City, Fl. and she said Barry was > not to bad. They had sustained winds of about 40 mph, and a few peak gusts > of 70 mph. > > I was at work yesterday in the DC-9 and left TPA at noon going to PHL. I Got > a good look at all the weather and the feeder bands that Barry was spinning > off. By late afternoon yesterday our Captains were refusing to fly to Ft. > Walton Beach, FL. The Metar was 45 knots gusting to 55 knots with Tornado > warnings for the whole area. > > I talked to my best friend this morning who is a National Catastrophe > Response Specialist for State Farm Insurance (if only they quoted > airplanes!!) and he said they did NOT mobilize a CAT team in response to > Barry because they had only 38 claims on the panhandle coast. > > God bless all and I'm glad everyone is O.K. > > Paul Reason ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 06, 2001
From: JETPAUL(at)aol.com <JETPAUL(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Hurricane Barry
I know Nico!!! We still dont understand why you live someplace that is known far and wide because if it's frequent earthquakes!!! Paul Reason ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 06, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: Hurricane Barry
Having grown up near the Tropic of Capricorn, I kind of miss the occasional thunderstorm. Earthquakes? We don't get them that often that we feel them, you know, but the guys who have probes in the ground reckon that we have many smaller ones every day. Folks, if I have to listen to my wife with that intensity, and hear everthing with that sharp an ear, I would also be worried and probably live elsewhere. I will tell you, though, that the '94 shaker was one wild ride. (Don't mean to be insensitive to those who were scarred by it.) So is a thunderstorm. I am always in awe at the raw power of nature. Imagine the energy! Then those who know appreciates Aero Commanders. Never tried to pitch one against an earthquake, though, but my straight 500 has once or twice swam its way across the sky without getting me wet. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: <JETPAUL(at)aol.com> To: ; ; Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 9:04 AM Subject: Re: Hurricane Barry > I know Nico!!! We still dont understand why you live someplace that is > known far and wide because if it's frequent earthquakes!!! > > Paul Reason ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 06, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: RNCP
Hey,what happened to the B.J. the damned weatherman promised me? AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 06, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Don't open email from Marcia de Klerk. It's a virus!!!
Virus alert, Folks. Don't open email from Marcia de Klerk. If you delete it, also delete it then from your Deleted Items folder. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: Milt To: Commander Chat Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 4:55 AM Subject: Barry Well Barry turned out to be just a little wet fart. (the storm that is, not Barry Hancock) It went ashore well West of Big Als new home and even though I havent talked to him Im sure he's OK. You could actually scud run along the Florida panhandle coast this AM. Severe clear hear here in GPT. I suspect the Guys in Northern Florida and Georgia will see worse weather from Barry than we did. Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 06, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <thall5(at)kc.rr.com>
Subject: Another Virus
Gang, I just got hit with another virus from the chat list. My Norton just went off and I have deleted it. Make sure you empty your trash as well. Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 06, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <tylorh(at)sound.net>
Subject: Re: RNCP
Big Al, I guess that Barry was not the big blow hard it was cracked up to be. What are the other Barry's like? We will see later this month. I take it everything is OK down your way??? We still on for going to the fly in?? Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 -----Original Message----- From: Allen Reed [mailto:allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 5:12 PM To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Subject: RNCP Hey,what happened to the B.J. the damned weatherman promised me? AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: Barry
Well Barry turned out to be just a little wet fart. (the storm that is, not Barry Hancock) I've been called worse but thanks for the clarification, Milt! Barry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 2001
From: Deborah Looman <whiteslave2(at)home.com>
Subject: Bandit! 12 o'clock low!
After flying up to Morris' place, over the coastal range to Watsonville, then back down to SNA/John Wayne airport via the coastal route on a crystal clear day, I made my way down to Arizona for some business and to pick up my mother in Tucson. The day began with a short flight from DVT in Phoenix north to Prescott. With building cumulus rising above the high desert floor and the morning sun painting the numerous rock formations in the area I shot my first short approach...full flaps, 17" and a 30 degree bank from abeam the threshold. 680E came around like she was on rails and touched down at the captain's bars with her nose proudly in the air until the wings would no longer carry it. My first true greaser in the AC. With business finished in Prescott, I blasted out of Love field just ahead of the approaching build-ups for the 50 min. flight down to Tucson Int'l. It was to be my mom's first flight in 680E. At *only* 103 degrees, the Tucson tarmac was not producing the boiling gas tornadoes I had experienced on the runway a few weeks earlier in Phoenix. After watching a flight of 4 F-16's depart (minus afterburner,


June 20, 2001 - August 08, 2001

Commander-Archive.digest.vol-ac