Commander-Archive.digest.vol-ad

August 08, 2001 - September 12, 2001



      unfortunately) we lined up on the center line on 11R, and after a thumbs up
      from mom, blasted off with a climbing right turnout.  The thermals may not
      have been coming off the runway, but *man* was it bumpy shortly after we got
      the gear up.  Bad timing.  Ya see, 680E doesn't have air conditioning and
      after sitting on the ground for 15 min. waiting to take off, it was more
      than a bit steamy in the cabin.  What's worse mom forgot to take her
      dramamine...the results were predictable.
      
      The bumps stayed with us all the way to 10.5.  Good thing mom brought a big
      plastic bag.  Finally, about a half an hour into the flight the chop quit
      and the cabin "fresh air" was taking effect.  The sweat off mom's brow had
      evaporated and she was drifting off into the post motion sickness daze.
      
      I had just cracked the celophane on my turkey sandwich when all of the
      sudden, "Bear, there's a wasp under your seat!"  "What?!"  "Yeah, I just saw
      a big yellow wasp go under your seat," said mom.
      
      Just as I turned around in front of me to look down, THERE IT WAS!  What I
      thought was just the fresh air blowing on my right leg was actually a wasp
      the size of Montana flying/crawling up my leg!  This thing was right out of
      a "Lost World" script!
      
      As my blood pressure went throught the roof and I'm gasping for air
      (consider for a second I am highly allergic to bees and wasps...), I cocked
      my left middle finger against my thumb preparing to flick that little
      f**cker into oblivion.  He must have seen it coming because just as I fired
      the first round, he jumped a little further up my leg as the nail of my left
      middle finger whizzed by his stinger laden tail.  No sooner than I let out
      an "OHH, SH**" did I see his little deriere pushing it's way past my leg
      hairs to inflict immence pain with his jurassic ass.
      
      But his gloating cost him as I quickly reloaded and fired a second salvo
      with my left bird finger.  This time it found it's mark.  "How's that for a
      catapult ride, mother F'er!!!"  The yellow peckerhead got the ride of his
      life right into the carpet on the left sidewall next to the right seat...and
      stuck without even a flintch!
      
      The bogey dispatched I was happy to find that the aircraft was trimmed well
      and no significant turbulence had put us into a graveyard spiral.  As I
      began breathing again with my heart beat becoming less visible underneath my
      shirt, I refastened my seatbelt as a laughing voice came over the intercom,
      "I thought for a minute that I was going to have to land this darned thing!"
      "Me too!" I replied.
      
      The rest of the trip was spent manuvering around the desert thunder boomers
      and making sure my mom was going to survive.  After putting down at SNA,
      mom's first flight with me had thankfully come to a close without further
      incident.
      
      In retrospect, this flight seems like it might be a part of aviation
      history.  Though severly outmatched in both firepower and turning ability,
      this may be the first recored downing of a Hornet by an Aero Commander.
      Looks like the F/A-18E *is* a needed upgrade.
      
      Barry 
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Bandit! 12 o'clock low! RESEND
I sent this from the wrong mailbox! After flying up to Morris' place, over the coastal range to Watsonville, then back down to SNA/John Wayne airport via the coastal route on a crystal clear day, I made my way down to Arizona for some business and to pick up my mother in Tucson. The day began with a short flight from DVT in Phoenix north to Prescott. With building cumulus rising above the high desert floor and the morning sun painting the numerous rock formations in the area I shot my first short approach...full flaps, 17" and a 30 degree bank from abeam the threshold. 680E came around like she was on rails and touched down at the captain's bars with her nose proudly in the air until the wings would no longer carry it. My first true greaser in the AC. With business finished in Prescott, I blasted out of Love field just ahead of the approaching build-ups for the 50 min. flight down to Tucson Int'l. It was to be my mom's first flight in 680E. At *only* 103 degrees, the Tucson tarmac was not producing the boiling gas tornadoes I had experienced on the runway a few weeks earlier in Phoenix. After watching a flight of 4 F-16's depart (minus afterburner, unfortunately) we lined up on the center line on 11R, and after a thumbs up from mom, blasted off with a climbing right turnout. The thermals may not have been coming off the runway, but *man* was it bumpy shortly after we got the gear up. Bad timing. Ya see, 680E doesn't have air conditioning and after sitting on the ground for 15 min. waiting to take off, it was more than a bit steamy in the cabin. What's worse mom forgot to take her dramamine...the results were predictable. The bumps stayed with us all the way to 10.5. Good thing mom brought a big plastic bag. Finally, about a half an hour into the flight the chop quit and the cabin "fresh air" was taking effect. The sweat off mom's brow had evaporated and she was drifting off into the post motion sickness daze. I had just cracked the celophane on my turkey sandwich when all of the sudden, "Bear, there's a wasp under your seat!" "What?!" "Yeah, I just saw a big yellow wasp go under your seat," said mom. Just as I turned around in front of me to look down, THERE IT WAS! What I thought was just the fresh air blowing on my right leg was actually a wasp the size of Montana flying/crawling up my leg! This thing was right out of a "Lost World" script! As my blood pressure went throught the roof and I'm gasping for air (consider for a second I am highly allergic to bees and wasps...), I cocked my left middle finger against my thumb preparing to flick that little f**cker into oblivion. He must have seen it coming because just as I fired the first round, he jumped a little further up my leg as the nail of my left middle finger whizzed by his stinger laden tail. No sooner than I let out an "OHH, SH**" did I see his little deriere pushing it's way past my leg hairs to inflict immence pain with his jurassic ass. But his gloating cost him as I quickly reloaded and fired a second salvo with my left bird finger. This time it found it's mark. "How's that for a catapult ride, mother F'er!!!" The yellow peckerhead got the ride of his life right into the carpet on the left sidewall next to the right seat...and stuck without even a flintch! The bogey dispatched I was happy to find that the aircraft was trimmed well and no significant turbulence had put us into a graveyard spiral. As I began breathing again with my heart beat becoming less visible underneath my shirt, I refastened my seatbelt as a laughing voice came over the intercom, "I thought for a minute that I was going to have to land this darned thing!" "Me too!" I replied. The rest of the trip was spent manuvering around the desert thunder boomers and making sure my mom was going to survive. After putting down at SNA, mom's first flight with me had thankfully come to a close without further incident. In retrospect, this flight seems like it might be a part of aviation history. Though severly outmatched in both firepower and turning ability, this may be the first recored downing of a Hornet by an Aero Commander. Looks like the F/A-18E *is* a needed upgrade. Barry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 2001
From: John Vormbaum <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: Bandit! 12 o'clock low!
Bandit! 12 o'clock low!Mighty Tropical Storm Barry (or am I confused again?), Your eloquence is astounding, both in descriptiveness and verbosity. At the risk of a serious backlash, I daresay that you give our good Capt. Jimbob a run for his money in recounting your aerial adventures. As is true through history, you have triumphed against great odds simply out of necessity and a willingness to fight. The history books are filled with exploits of men as undaunted and couageous as yourself. Interestingly, I was rudely surprised last Sunday afternoon. As I climbed out of SAC through 8.5 bound for home (PAO), there at 2 o'clock and 9" was an enemy hornet...the first I'd seen at such close proximity in my limited flying career. Alas, the story ends there...the stealth equipment of 353CC must have proven too much, as the hornet evidently lost radar lock and was condemned to the Hell of Heater Ductwork. A diving turn to the defroster (lining up for a nose-to-nose shot, I imagine), and I never saw that hornet again (thankfully). On one level I was preparing for the embarassment of being the first TCFG member to go down from a sting, and on the other hand, all I could hear was the voice of my primary instructor saying "no matter what.....FLY THE AIRPLANE." Upon landing at PAO, SAR (OK, me) made a sweep up front and found the offending (and sun-cooked--dead) hornet nestled between the windshield and glareshield. Not exactly a combat kill a la Barry, but a victory nonetheless. Score TCFG 2, Black-n-Yellow Air Force 0. Aero Commanders RULE. /John ----- Original Message ----- From: Deborah Looman To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 9:48 PM Subject: Bandit! 12 o'clock low! After flying up to Morris' place, over the coastal range to Watsonville, then back down to SNA/John Wayne airport via the coastal route on a crystal clear day, I made my way down to Arizona for some business and to pick up my mother in Tucson. The day began with a short flight from DVT in Phoenix north to Prescott. With building cumulus rising above the high desert floor and the morning sun painting the numerous rock formations in the area I shot my first short approach...full flaps, 17" and a 30 degree bank from abeam the threshold. 680E came around like she was on rails and touched down at the captain's bars with her nose proudly in the air until the wings would no longer carry it. My first true greaser in the AC. With business finished in Prescott, I blasted out of Love field just ahead of the approaching build-ups for the 50 min. flight down to Tucson Int'l. It was to be my mom's first flight in 680E. At *only* 103 degrees, the Tucson tarmac was not producing the boiling gas tornadoes I had experienced on the runway a few weeks earlier in Phoenix. After watching a flight of 4 F-16's depart (minus afterburner, unfortunately) we lined up on the center line on 11R, and after a thumbs up from mom, blasted off with a climbing right turnout. The thermals may not have been coming off the runway, but *man* was it bumpy shortly after we got the gear up. Bad timing. Ya see, 680E doesn't have air conditioning and after sitting on the ground for 15 min. waiting to take off, it was more than a bit steamy in the cabin. What's worse mom forgot to take her dramamine...the results were predictable. The bumps stayed with us all the way to 10.5. Good thing mom brought a big plastic bag. Finally, about a half an hour into the flight the chop quit and the cabin "fresh air" was taking effect. The sweat off mom's brow had evaporated and she was drifting off into the post motion sickness daze. I had just cracked the celophane on my turkey sandwich when all of the sudden, "Bear, there's a wasp under your seat!" "What?!" "Yeah, I just saw a big yellow wasp go under your seat," said mom. Just as I turned around in front of me to look down, THERE IT WAS! What I thought was just the fresh air blowing on my right leg was actually a wasp the size of Montana flying/crawling up my leg! This thing was right out of a "Lost World" script! As my blood pressure went throught the roof and I'm gasping for air (consider for a second I am highly allergic to bees and wasps...), I cocked my left middle finger against my thumb preparing to flick that little f**cker into oblivion. He must have seen it coming because just as I fired the first round, he jumped a little further up my leg as the nail of my left middle finger whizzed by his stinger laden tail. No sooner than I let out an "OHH, SH**" did I see his little deriere pushing it's way past my leg hairs to inflict immence pain with his jurassic ass. But his gloating cost him as I quickly reloaded and fired a second salvo with my left bird finger. This time it found it's mark. "How's that for a catapult ride, mother F'er!!!" The yellow peckerhead got the ride of his life right into the carpet on the left sidewall next to the right seat...and stuck without even a flintch! The bogey dispatched I was happy to find that the aircraft was trimmed well and no significant turbulence had put us into a graveyard spiral. As I began breathing again with my heart beat becoming less visible underneath my shirt, I refastened my seatbelt as a laughing voice came over the intercom, "I thought for a minute that I was going to have to land this darned thing!" "Me too!" I replied. The rest of the trip was spent manuvering around the desert thunder boomers and making sure my mom was going to survive. After putting down at SNA, mom's first flight with me had thankfully come to a close without further incident. In retrospect, this flight seems like it might be a part of aviation history. Though severly outmatched in both firepower and turning ability, this may be the first recored downing of a Hornet by an Aero Commander. Looks like the F/A-18E *is* a needed upgrade. Barry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Bandit! 12 o'clock low!
GREAT STORY BARRY............... Thanks jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Bandit! 12 o'clock low!
In a message dated 8/9/01 12:57:44 AM Pacific Daylight Time, john(at)vormbaum.com writes: > Sounds like the Commanders are "two for two" jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 2001
From: Milt Concannon <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Re: Bandit! 12 o'clock low!
The score for all you hornet killers isnt exactly TCFG 2, Bandits 0 My new plane came with a story of being knocked out of the sky from 21,000' by some muddaubers. They apparently filled the fuel vents with mud up and out of sight which allowed the plane to achieve altitude before a double flame out it was being flown by an apparently skilled pilot who deadsticked it with minimal damage. I think Keith and Barry have more of the specifics than I do but the true score is TCFG 2, Bugs 1 Milt ----- Original Message ----- From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com To: whiteslave2(at)home.com ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 9:34 AM Subject: Re: Bandit! 12 o'clock low! GREAT STORY BARRY............... Thanks jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Mud Daubbers - 1
In a message dated 08/09/01 08:07:57 Pacific Daylight Time, mdcmd@ms-online.com writes: > My new plane came with a story of being knocked out of the sky from 21,000' > by some muddaubers. They apparently filled the fuel vents with mud up and > out of sight which allowed the plane to achieve altitude before a double > True! N414C was en route from Tucson, Arizona to Oshkosh. With some reasonable amount of fuel on board indicated, both engines quit from fuel starvation. (Note: not fuel exhaustion) The pilot set up for a dead-stick landing at a small airport, spiraled down in a text book perfect set-up ... and was completely screwed when the gear came down instantly! Yes! He had read the manual and noted it was suggested that it took 12 seconds for gear to come down with a hydraulic failure. In this case, there was no hydraulic failure, plus, the pneumatic system works really well. So, now, gear is down and locked -- way too soon -- if you can imagine such a thing -- and his glide planning is shot to hell. He sets up on an empty field that's been graded for construction, looks perfect for an off-airport landing and just prior to touchdown, an earth mover or some other heavy construction equipment turns from its path, right across his "landing strip." This forced a 90 degree turn, into the furrowed field next to the graded, smooth lot and the result was a collapsed nose gear. Not much else. The aircraft was lifted and moved to the (very) nearby airport and 2 days later was on its way to Dakota Aero for repairs. For the skeptics: There were passengers on board this flight and although I did not see it, most of this event was video taped, including the instrument panel, showing the fuel remaining on the gauge. Moral of the story: if you live in mud daubber country, cover your fuel vents as well as everything else. The clog was so far up inside the fuel vent lines, it was not dectable (without a bore scope). Now, all this being said, what I really want to know is this who is "whiteslave2" that Barry first filed his Hornet report under. Is there something you'd like to share with the rest of us, Mr. Hancock? Kind of weird call sign for a fighter pilot ... Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Mud Daubbers - 1
HI KIDS............... Well, I to have a "Bee" story, but not Commander related. Want to hear it?? Good. It was my first year flying AG and I was the proud pilot of a "paper pilot killer" or Piper Super Cub with a belly tank. I was flying for a fine old gentleman in Kansas. We always used roads as our runways, so to length was never a problem, landing with a full load of spray can however be challenging. I had just taken off and was staggering out when a huge bumble bee cruised past my ear. I heard him!! He was big enough to need an "N" number and made about three circuits before landing on the spray pressure gauge mounted on top if the instrument panel. He then just stared at me with all those thousands of eyes. I carefully removed my ball cap and raising it into the air, then froze. A little voice whispered to me "now jimbob, this is a very big bee and I think you should ether kill it or leave it alone, you really dont want to make him mad, are you sure you can kill it?????????????" Discretion being the better part of valor, I reluctantly landed straight ahead on the miles of endless hiway. Throughout the landing, he just sat there. Once stopped, I carefully exited the airplane and then proceeded to beat the farts out him. I missed and he flew merrily away. Man, was I glad I didn't try that at 200 feet in a loaded airplane!! As it was we both survived jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 2001
From: Furlong5(at)aol.com <Furlong5(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Mud Daubbers - 1
In a message dated 8/9/01 2:09:01 PM Pacific Daylight Time, YOURTCFG(at)aol.com writes: << I had just taken off and was staggering out when a huge bumble bee cruised past my ear. I heard him!! He was big enough to need an "N" number and >> While flying a Stearman many years ago -- too many --- a bee got trapped in the side of my leather helmet right beside my temple. I spoke nicely to him and when I got on the ground - took off my helmet and - he - or she departed. Did not want to deal with a bee sting while flying. Also, did not want to take the chance of extricating that bee while in the air. As an aside, my "new" AC500A, Colemill was delivered on Saturday July 14th. It has been in the shop since. Will not be ready for the "flyin". A major dissappointment. Jim Furlong ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 2001
From: Milt <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: RNAV manual
My new ride has a Collins ANS-351 RNAV. It now works but I have no manual. Anyone have one? Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 2001
From: Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk <Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk>
Subject: Restoration Project ?
Hi gang! The Quonset Air Museum were donated an old Model 680, serial 432-105 a few years back, N2100M. Rick Alexander, who used to work for Rockwell's publicity people, tells me it hadn't flown for about 20 years, and the Museum are considering trading it for a military aircraft, or may otherwise dispose of it. If anyone wants a restoration candidate, this could be one? See it on their web-site at: http://users.ids.net/~qam/Museum%20Aircraft%20Index/Aircraft%20Spec's/AC680.html Very Best Regards, Barry C. THIS TRANSMISSION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY If you are not the intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for return. Any distribution or copying of this document by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. Airclaims cannot be held responsible for any alterations made to this document, intentionally or Airclaims Limited, Registered Office: Cardinal Point, Newall Road, Heathrow Airport, Hounslow, Middlesex, TW6 2AS. Company Registration No. 710284 England and Wales. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: pretty quiet
Wow, been pretty quiet around here lately. Guess that we've discussed just about everything about Commanders of interest? Well, the flyin is just around the corner. I'm looking forward to meeting many of you. From what I'm hearing, it looks like there should be a pretty impressive turnout! Any of you last-minute undecided stragglers need to git yer tails in gear an get signed up with JB. Since I'm just rambling, I'll share a few other topics: I now declare myself to be a propane tractor guru. Over the last few days, I have been attempting to resurect a dead M&M tractor which I inherited. I had no knowledge whatsoever of propane systems and was unable to find anyone to overhaul what I had. Well, me being who I am, I decided just to tear the whole thing apart and see if I could figure out how it was supposed to work. I can tell you that you can fabricate all diaphrams (from innertubes) and all gaskets and other widgets successfully if needed. She now purrrrrs like a kitten. That HUGE old 6-banger is a sweet motor. On another topic, our friends on the other side of the planet (who like to crash into our airplanes and hold our people hostage) have been pretty successful at damaging the internet. The "code red worm" is causing vastly more financial damage than I would have believed. The receive light on my home cable modem is on almost continuous and I have 75% saturation of my home network even with no computers on just due to the worm's attempts to thrash the net. The Aerocommander.com server which is connected via a T1 link is taking several hundred attacks per second! Fortunately, I have no microsoft products online so I'm basicly immune to any potential for break-in, but it certainly toasts my cookies to see that I'm paying $2000/month in bandwidth which is being ravaged by vandals! Anyway, at this time you will see a slow down of the web site as well as some delay in getting email out to the chatlist. Until we can get all the idiots in the world running Microsoft's web servers to patch up the gaping holes in their security, this is likely to continue for a while. For those of you still using MS Outlook, be aware that there are several new viruses that could hit you pretty hard. Make sure you have all of the "features" in Outlook turned off please! I've been filtering out hundreds of viruses a day from the chatlist over the last week which are being auto-sent from folks running outlook without their knowledge. My appologies for letting a few slip through, but I can't "police" the list 24x7. The best suggestion is to use just about _anything_ other than Outlook. 'nuff rambles for now :-) Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Lake Tahoe private Fly-In
Well, well. Landed at Truckee (KTRK) today and there on the ramp were 3 Turbo Commanders parked in a row. N690AR, s/n 11155, a 690A N364WA, s/n 11439, a 690B with a fresh SB218 patch (kind of late at this pont in history for that, I'd think) N75U, s/n 11218, a dash 10'd and Q-tipped 690A Wonder if this was just coincidence, or, if these guys got together and had their own Fly-In. Nice to see them side by side, in any event. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Lake Tahoe private Fly-In
HI KEITH..... Did you take pix for Barry with your cardboard camera?? jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 2001
From: MRPOULIN27(at)aol.com <MRPOULIN27(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Activity
Oh good some activity, I was beginning to wonder if my email was working. Does anybody know the scedule for the "Fly-in"? I think it was asked earlier, but didn't see an answer. I was planning on coming in on the 16th, but may have to wait until Friday. Also, I noted fire mentioned in the 685's fuel lines. Four out of five sold by Aero Air? Whats the deal? I'll be sure to replace mine annually. And lastly, Clark if you out there can you call me @ HM:843-651-1195 or WK:843-357-3199 or eM: mrpoulin27(at)aol.com. Thanks! See y'all on the 17th! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Re: Activity
MRPOULIN27(at)aol.com wrote: > Does anybody know the scedule for the "Fly-in"? I think it was asked earlier, but didn't see an answer. > I was planning on coming in on the 16th, but may have to wait until Friday. Mark, The flyin is Aug 24-26 at HIO. I'll let JB fill in the day-to-day details. Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Activity
HI MARK AND KIDS.......... I apologize for the late send on the agenda. I will have one in the mail Monday to all but here is the short answer. Fri (24th) will be an arrival day. We will have a lunch/dinner BBQ and corn roast that afternoon and eve. There is a great grassy area where we can lie to each other about Commanders. It should be a great time to relax. Sat (25th) will be a full day of seminars with Jeff from TCAC, Morris, Dick Wartinger, Dick Mccoon and others. There will be a lunch and a time reminiscing with Swede Ralston about his 46 years selling and flying Commanders. I have a special award for him from the TCFG. The afternoon will end with a roundtable featuring many of the above speakers, in front of a Commander, so you can point to something you always wanted to know about and get an answer. Sunday (26th) will start with a cont breakfast and then a fun flight to Arlington and a special factory tour. You can ask to have the records for your airplane pulled and you can hold the "birth certificate" for your airplane. We will then fly to Friday Harbor, walk to town for a no-host lunch at the Downrigger. It is a great spot with a view of the ferry and seaplanes landing. That will be the official end of the activities. Sorry for the silence, I have really been swamped with flying the biplane but will get the conformation and agenda to everyone Monday. I NEED A RIDE FOR TWO FROM THE LONGBEACH CA. AREA. CAN ANYONE HELP?? LET ME KNOW ASAP. Thanks jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Gas prices at 0F8
Milt - FYI they just lowered 100LL prices again here. We're now at $1.80 /gal. Looks like a good time to fill your ship up! :-) Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Activity
HI KIDS......... Forgot to tell you about the evening activities. There will be a steak dinner in the hangar at 6:30 on Sat eve followed by a birthday celebration for the 520. I have a 50s DJ to play great music (not to loud) and we will have a nice evening in the hangar surrounded by Commanders. jb Ladies. I have a couple of you signed up for the shopping trip, any others??? Please let me know so my Lovely Bride can plan. Thanks!! jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 2001
From: Furlong5(at)aol.com <Furlong5(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Activity
In a message dated 8/12/01 9:04:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time, YOURTCFG(at)aol.com writes: << Ladies. I have a couple of you signed up for the shopping trip, any others??? Please let me know so my Lovely Bride can plan. Thanks!! jb >> Jim --- shopping trip where????? Jim Furlong ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Activity
In a message dated 8/12/2001 10:14:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time, Furlong5 writes: > > Jim --- shopping trip where????? HI JIM. Good question. Sue plans to take the ladies to the Saturday market in downtown PDX. It is a great place and you can find home made items next to name brand merchandise. There is a lot of different food choices there and one can get a feel for our community. Thanks for asking. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Re: Activity
YOURTCFG(at)aol.com wrote: > Forgot to tell you about the evening activities. > I have a couple of you signed up for the shopping trip Jim, How far is the hotel from the airport (or where-ever we're all meeting)? Does it happen to have a pool? My spousal unit is trying to schedule time Sat to visit with a friend in the area so we don't know if she'll be attending the shopping trip yet. Do you have a schedule for that? (ie: depart/ arrive times) Milt - I think you mentioned that you need to depart fairly early Sunday - is that correct? Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 2001
From: Furlong5(at)aol.com <Furlong5(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Activity
In a message dated 8/12/01 12:13:48 PM Pacific Daylight Time, chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com writes: Chris et al, I'll try to help JB if I can. I don't know at which hotel you are staying but the Hallmark - right across from HIO - does have a pool. Denise and I have a home on Main Street - 1.5 mi from HIO and know the area so will help any way we can. Jim Furlong << How far is the hotel from the airport (or where-ever we're all meeting)? Does it happen to have a pool? My spousal unit is trying to schedule time Sat to visit with a friend in the area so we don't know if she'll be attending the shopping trip yet. Do you have a schedule for that? (ie: depart/ arrive times) Milt - I think you mentioned that you need to depart fairly early Sunday - is that correct? Chris >> ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Lake Tahoe private Fly-In
In a message dated 08/11/01 10:04:34 Pacific Daylight Time, YOURTCFG(at)aol.com writes: > Did you take pix for Barry with your cardboard camera?? Uhhhhh. Ummmmmm. Errrrrrr. Well, no .... BUT! Mike Macosko did call me and tip me off that you broadcast this humiliating reminder/request and I did buy a disposable camera, went to Truckee airport 6 hours prior to departure (much to the pouting of my young copilot) just to shoot the pix. And naturally, they'd already gone. At least now I have that silly little camera on board. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 2001
From: TILLMAN333(at)aol.com <TILLMAN333(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Gas prices at 0F8
Chris: I'm stuck at DCA. "Signature-FBO" The weather this evening consists of Hail and Thunder Storms from DCA to RMG... Rome, Ga. As for gas, $3.09 per gallon. I guess the guy who just departed in the $210,000 Bentley can afford it with no problem. Proud to say that I'm sitting in the pilot's lounge with my wonderful wife and three lovely daughter watching a $11,000 "big Screen" TV. Wow, I never dreamed I would go from a $3,500 Tri-Pacer to visiting with the King...Seem like yesterday we were all flying around following roads to the next town... Now we file direct to the next country... See you guys and gals in HIO. Gary Tillman Ps. This is the first time in 20 years that I've filed IFR for immeditate departure, and within 15 minutes canncelled the flight...The upto date radar does not lie...FlySafe ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 2001
From: Furlong5(at)aol.com <Furlong5(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Activity
Jim et al, I'm in Southern CA this week and in Los Altos next. I called Denise today and she would be happy to help host the women coming on the trip. Hillsboro is a quaint little town. As I said there is a Saturday market in the morning, most of the buildings in the town were built at the turn of the century and there are a number of antique shops. All of this is within 1.5 mi of HIO. The Pharmacy in town has been around since 1892 and still has an old soda fountain. Surrounding Hillsboro is an abundance of farm land with beautiful drives that are all close. There are also a number of vineyards that have tasting rooms open to the public. Just let us know what the women would like to do and Denise will do her best to help. Jim Furlong ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Welcome newbies
Well, we've had about a half-dozen new folks sign up to the mail list over the last week. Welcome aboard! Y'all take a moment to introduce yourselves (and your airplanes if you own). For the newbies: I'm Chris Schuermann (Tulsa,OK). I operate the mail list and the web site (www.aerocommander.com). I'm a rabid aviation enthusiast. My current steed is a Bellanca Turbo Viking although I owned a Commander 520 for about 6 years and am shopping for another Commander currently. Jim Metzger (aka Capt Jimbob) is the head cheeze of the Twin Commander Flight Group (TCFG). The TCFG is a paid membership type group which supports owners of Commanders. If you're an owner or are simply looking for expertise to learn more about Twin Commanders, I strongly urge you to join the Flight Group. Contact: Jim Metzger Twin Commander Flight Group 38205 se70th Washougal WA 98671 (360) 835-1090 email: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com Also, the TCFG is having a flyin Aug 24-26 at Hillsboro OR. It promises to be a great time with plenty of fine food as well as discussions by some serious Commander gurus! Cost is $100/head and you'll need to contact Jim ASAP to make arrangments if you have not already done so. Further info available on the web site. Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Progress of SoloSpirit - FYI
Another aviator; another adventurer. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: SoloSpirit List <sololist(at)solospirit.wustl.edu> To: SoloSpirit List Subscriber Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 4:12 PM Subject: [sololist] Update from Mission Control at Washington University in St. Louis > > > 12-hour Summary > > Solo Spirit: Approaching South America > some 600 > miles in the last 12 hours, Fossett is nearing the end of his flight over the > Pacific Ocean as he approaches Chile. Passing Easter Island earlier today, > Fossett is headed toward the island of San Felix, which is about 500 miles (805 > kilometers) off the Chilean coast. Fossett is expected to reach South America > Tuesday after daybreak. > > Today was Fossett's fifth day over water and his eighth day in the air. Since > launching on August 4, Solo Spirit has flown approximately 9,200 miles. Mission > Control reports that Fossett has been monitoring winds at various altitudes in > search of one that would speed the pace of his around-the-globe mission. He has > completed nearly 40 percent of the total miles, although at his present pace, he > will exceed the two-week journey originally projected. > > In the meantime, Fossett is approaching the second-longest around-the-world solo > flight distance record. In January 1997, he set the solo balloon world distance > record of 10,361 miles. And in August 1998, he beat his own record by traveling > 14,236 miles. > > Fossett is still upbeat as good weather and a well-functioning balloon help him > continue. > > > For more information on the flight, please visit our Web page at > http://solospirit.wustl.edu. > > > --- > You are currently subscribed to sololist as: nico(at)cybersuperstore.com > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-sololist-8053P(at)solospirit.wustl.edu > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Activity
In a message dated 8/12/2001 12:13:48 PM Pacific Daylight Time, chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com writes: > Jim, > How far is the hotel from the airport (or where-ever we're all > meeting)? Does it happen to have a pool? The motel is less than a mile from the airport and yes, it does have a nice pool. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Lake Tahoe private Fly-In
Barry will love you . jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 2001
From: JETPAUL(at)aol.com <JETPAUL(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Restoration Project ?
In a message dated 8/10/01 5:09:38 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk writes: << http://users.ids.net/~qam/Museum%20Aircraft%20Index/Aircraft%20Spec's/AC680.ht ml >> Hey Chris!! Isn't this the airplane from one of your old factory brochures on your website?? Paul Reason ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Lake Tahoe private Fly-In
In a message dated 08/12/01 20:58:31 Pacific Daylight Time, YOURTCFG(at)aol.com writes: > Barry will love you . It's a mutual love affair. In fact, if I were able to attend the Fly-In, we were going to get married there. It will have to wait now, I'm afraid. (Did I give a away the surprize, Sir Barry?) Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 2001
From: JETPAUL(at)aol.com <JETPAUL(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Gas prices at 0F8
Good move to cancel Gary!!! I was through there today as well. I was holiding in the DC-9 Trying to get into Philly. I had left Tamp in an airplane with no AUX tank. I could have really used that extra 4000 lbs. today!! I declared Min Fuel (Guys and Girl dont EVER be scared to say those words. It only means that you can accept no further delays. It is nothing like a LOW FUEL EMERGENCY where everyone has to get out way and you are instantly #1 for the closest runway.) My 2:20 trip turned into 3:30 and I was OUT-O-PUSH WATER!!!! I told the Center that I had 10 left in holding untill diverting to D.C. for fuel and they gave clearance to shoot the apprch. 8 minutes later. I WAS 2 MINS FROM THE "E" Word. If you fly for a living you will find yourself in this situation 3-5 times a year maybe. It's not fun and can be avoided by just saying "NO" (to taking off that is.) Finally got home to hot 'Lanta (That ATLANTA for you guys who put Limes in your beer.) I was greeted at the gate by none other than our very own TCFG member Jim Crunkleton. He took my jet (now his jet, we only get to keep for so long) to Orlando. But the good news is that he told today I can become partner in his 520 soon. Paul Reason ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 2001
From: JETPAUL(at)aol.com <JETPAUL(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Activity
TASTING ROOMS?? DID YOU SAY TASTING ROOMS>>> Better look out!!! From what I have gathered about Big Al he's going to want to go there. (Do they allow "NO NAME" in the tasting rooms for "Comparrison" test only??) Paul Reason ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 2001
From: JETPAUL(at)aol.com <JETPAUL(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Lake Tahoe private Fly-In
Well I must say......You guys are starting to scare me now!!!! Or was that the "NO-NAME Talkin'??? I'd marry Crunk if he were up to it!!!! Just to get to use his hangar/house/Fuel Farm/2-Twin-Commnaders/RV-8/Private strip//////////////////(It goes on and on!!) NOT!!!!! Better just keep my partnerships in Commanders stay out of Divorce Court. Paul Reason ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 2001
From: w.bow <w.bow(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Lake Tahoe private Fly-In
Is this some kinda Left Coast thing? bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com To: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com Cc: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 12:06 AM Subject: Re: Lake Tahoe private Fly-In In a message dated 08/12/01 20:58:31 Pacific Daylight Time, YOURTCFG(at)aol.com writes: Barry will love you . jb It's a mutual love affair. In fact, if I were able to attend the Fly-In, we were going to get married there. It will have to wait now, I'm afraid. (Did I give a away the surprize, Sir Barry?) Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 2001
From: res00rbl <res00rbl(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: pretty quiet
Hey Chris - do you work for Oracle or Sun Microsystems, or what??? You sound like that jerk Joel Klein from the DOJ - lighten up a little, huh? Jim Jorgensen -----Original Message----- From: chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com [mailto:chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com] Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 6:47 PM To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Subject: pretty quiet Wow, been pretty quiet around here lately. Guess that we've discussed just about everything about Commanders of interest? Well, the flyin is just around the corner. I'm looking forward to meeting many of you. From what I'm hearing, it looks like there should be a pretty impressive turnout! Any of you last-minute undecided stragglers need to git yer tails in gear an get signed up with JB. Since I'm just rambling, I'll share a few other topics: I now declare myself to be a propane tractor guru. Over the last few days, I have been attempting to resurect a dead M&M tractor which I inherited. I had no knowledge whatsoever of propane systems and was unable to find anyone to overhaul what I had. Well, me being who I am, I decided just to tear the whole thing apart and see if I could figure out how it was supposed to work. I can tell you that you can fabricate all diaphrams (from innertubes) and all gaskets and other widgets successfully if needed. She now purrrrrs like a kitten. That HUGE old 6-banger is a sweet motor. On another topic, our friends on the other side of the planet (who like to crash into our airplanes and hold our people hostage) have been pretty successful at damaging the internet. The "code red worm" is causing vastly more financial damage than I would have believed. The receive light on my home cable modem is on almost continuous and I have 75% saturation of my home network even with no computers on just due to the worm's attempts to thrash the net. The Aerocommander.com server which is connected via a T1 link is taking several hundred attacks per second! Fortunately, I have no microsoft products online so I'm basicly immune to any potential for break-in, but it certainly toasts my cookies to see that I'm paying $2000/month in bandwidth which is being ravaged by vandals! Anyway, at this time you will see a slow down of the web site as well as some delay in getting email out to the chatlist. Until we can get all the idiots in the world running Microsoft's web servers to patch up the gaping holes in their security, this is likely to continue for a while. For those of you still using MS Outlook, be aware that there are several new viruses that could hit you pretty hard. Make sure you have all of the "features" in Outlook turned off please! I've been filtering out hundreds of viruses a day from the chatlist over the last week which are being auto-sent from folks running outlook without their knowledge. My appologies for letting a few slip through, but I can't "police" the list 24x7. The best suggestion is to use just about _anything_ other than Outlook. 'nuff rambles for now :-) Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Re: pretty quiet
res00rbl wrote: > > Hey Chris - do you work for Oracle or Sun Microsystems, or what??? You > sound like that jerk Joel Klein from the DOJ - lighten up a little, huh? > Jim Jorgensen Jim, I'm just a guy who has created his own small business with my own money and lots of 100 hour work weeks. I sold just about everything I owned to start this business including my car, my airplane, and my house. If I sound a bit "heavy", it's only due to the fact that every time some bozo decides to try to break into my computers, hack my networks, or steal from me it basicly ends up costing me enough that I have no income for the month. Frankly, I consider those actions to be right up there with any other form of vandalism. The last time someone hacked one of my servers, they vandalized my web site and then trashed the filesystems on several other machines. I ended up having to borrow money to cover the substantial expenses in overtime trying to recover from the damage as well as lost the faith of a couple of my customers who's projects were affected by the delays. If that sounds like a "jerk" to you then so be it, but when someone breaks into YOUR house someday and decides to valdalize the place make sure to be a bit introspective about how you feel about it... Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 2001
From: res00rbl <res00rbl(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: pretty quiet
I totally agree with you about the vandals - it's just that your mail inferred Microsoft was to blame, somehow. Why do you think the vandals target MSFT & Outlook - it's because they no that they can screw up many more users with less effort. It's not the carrier's fault - it's the hackers! I feel bad for the economic consequences to you & thousands of others - I just felt that it was right to blame the bad actors, and not the stage on (in) which they are playing out their script. Thanks again for all your hard work, Chris. Jim Jorgensen -----Original Message----- From: Chris Schuermann [mailto:chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 7:58 AM To: res00rbl; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Subject: Re: pretty quiet res00rbl wrote: > > Hey Chris - do you work for Oracle or Sun Microsystems, or what??? You > sound like that jerk Joel Klein from the DOJ - lighten up a little, huh? > Jim Jorgensen Jim, I'm just a guy who has created his own small business with my own money and lots of 100 hour work weeks. I sold just about everything I owned to start this business including my car, my airplane, and my house. If I sound a bit "heavy", it's only due to the fact that every time some bozo decides to try to break into my computers, hack my networks, or steal from me it basicly ends up costing me enough that I have no income for the month. Frankly, I consider those actions to be right up there with any other form of vandalism. The last time someone hacked one of my servers, they vandalized my web site and then trashed the filesystems on several other machines. I ended up having to borrow money to cover the substantial expenses in overtime trying to recover from the damage as well as lost the faith of a couple of my customers who's projects were affected by the delays. If that sounds like a "jerk" to you then so be it, but when someone breaks into YOUR house someday and decides to valdalize the place make sure to be a bit introspective about how you feel about it... Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: pretty quiet
And it's probably wise not to publicize what goes through your mind after discovering such a violation. Nico What flashes through a bug's mind after hitting a windshield? His rear end. ----- Original Message ----- From: res00rbl <res00rbl(at)verizon.net> To: ; Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 8:12 AM Subject: RE: pretty quiet > I totally agree with you about the vandals - it's just that your mail > inferred Microsoft was to blame, somehow. Why do you think the vandals > target MSFT & Outlook - it's because they no that they can screw up many > more users with less effort. It's not the carrier's fault - it's the > hackers! > I feel bad for the economic consequences to you & thousands of others - I > just felt that it was right to blame the bad actors, and not the stage on > (in) which they are playing out their script. > Thanks again for all your hard work, Chris. > > Jim Jorgensen > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Schuermann [mailto:chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com] > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 7:58 AM > To: res00rbl; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com > Subject: Re: pretty quiet > > res00rbl wrote: > > > > Hey Chris - do you work for Oracle or Sun Microsystems, or what??? > You > > sound like that jerk Joel Klein from the DOJ - lighten up a little, huh? > > Jim Jorgensen > > Jim, > I'm just a guy who has created his own small business with my own > money and lots of 100 hour work weeks. I sold just about everything > I owned to start this business including my car, my airplane, and > my house. If I sound a bit "heavy", it's only due to the fact > that every time some bozo decides to try to break into my computers, > hack my networks, or steal from me it basicly ends up costing me > enough that I have no income for the month. > Frankly, I consider those actions to be right up there with any other > form of vandalism. The last time someone hacked one of my servers, > they vandalized my web site and then trashed the filesystems on several > other machines. I ended up having to borrow money to cover the > substantial expenses in overtime trying to recover from the damage as > well as lost the faith of a couple of my customers who's projects > were affected by the delays. > If that sounds like a "jerk" to you then so be it, but when someone > breaks into YOUR house someday and decides to valdalize the place > make sure to be a bit introspective about how you feel about it... > > Chris > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 2001
From: Milt <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: RNCP
> > > > An RNCPs daughter is in love > > > > Susie Lee fell in love. > > She planned to marry Joe. > > She was so happy 'bout it all, > > she told her Pappy so. > > > > Pappy told her, "Susie Gal, > > you'll have to find another. > > I'd just as soon yo' maw don't know, > > but Joe is yo' half-brother." > > > > So Susie forgot about her Joe > > and planned to marry Will. > > But, after telling Pappy this, > > he said, "There's trouble still. > > > > You can't marry Will, my gal, > > and please don't tell yo' mother, > > cause Will and Joe and several mo' > > I know is yo' half-brother." > > > > But Mama knew and said "Honey Child, > > Do what makes yo' happy. > > Marry Will or marry Joe, > > you ain't no kin to Pappy > > > > > > End > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 2001
From: Randy Sharp <sharp.r(at)apple.com>
Subject: Re: Lake Tahoe private Fly-In
CloudCraft(at)aol.com said: >Well, well. >Landed at Truckee (KTRK) today and there on the ramp were 3 Turbo Commanders >parked in a row. >N690AR, s/n 11155, a 690A >N364WA, s/n 11439, a 690B with a fresh SB218 patch (kind of late at this >pont in history for that, I'd think) >N75U, s/n 11218, a dash 10'd and Q-tipped 690A >Wonder if this was just coincidence, or, if these guys got together and had >their own Fly-In. >Nice to see them side by side, in any event. >Wing Commander Gordon I routinely fly into KTVL (South Lake Tahoe), about every weekend. I am constently amazed on how many Cmdrs I see. (690s, 680s, 500s etc.) This past weekend; N6253X a 680F was parked next to the Citation, 2 down from me. I believe it is owned by Mr. DETTMER. (Next time your in Tahoe, give me a call 530 543-0733 and come up for a beer/coke) Randy ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 2001
From: John Vormbaum <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: Lake Tahoe private Fly-In
I figured Mr. Dettmer was someplace fun, as I was at SBP this weekend and didn't see N6253X in her customary parking spot... Tahoe is one of my favorite fly-in destinations as well, although I seem to favor TRK over TVL. Cheers, /J ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Sharp" <sharp.r(at)apple.com> To: Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 11:42 AM Subject: Re: Lake Tahoe private Fly-In > CloudCraft(at)aol.com said: > >Well, well. > >Landed at Truckee (KTRK) today and there on the ramp were 3 Turbo Commanders > >parked in a row. > >N690AR, s/n 11155, a 690A > >N364WA, s/n 11439, a 690B with a fresh SB218 patch (kind of late at this > >pont in history for that, I'd think) > >N75U, s/n 11218, a dash 10'd and Q-tipped 690A > >Wonder if this was just coincidence, or, if these guys got together and had > >their own Fly-In. > >Nice to see them side by side, in any event. > >Wing Commander Gordon > > I routinely fly into KTVL (South Lake Tahoe), about every weekend. > I am constently amazed on how many Cmdrs I see. (690s, 680s, 500s etc.) > > This past weekend; N6253X a 680F was parked next to the Citation, 2 down > from me. > I believe it is owned by Mr. DETTMER. > (Next time your in Tahoe, give me a call 530 543-0733 and come up for a > beer/coke) > > Randy > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 2001
From: Mark Burson <info(at)reaganfoundation.org>
Subject: Ronald Reagan's 1976 Campaign
Dear Nico, In August 1976, then citizen Reagan challenged President Ford for the Republican Nomination, losing the nomination by a mere 117 votes. Twenty-five years after the contest, the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation is proud to host a Reagan Forum entitled "A Revolution Revealed: The Reagan Presidential Bid in 1976" on Wednesday, August 22nd, 2001. Peggy Noonan, special assistant and speechwriter to President Reagan, and Martin Anderson, Senior Policy Adviser to President Reagan, will discuss the importance of this campaign, what it meant to those who were there, and how it became a model for future political bids. If you would like to attend this event, please call 805-522-2977 for tickets. Running the Right Way: Ronald Reagan's 1976 Campaign By Mark Burson It will no doubt seem odd to some that this year we commemorate the 25th anniversary of the only election Ronald Reagan ever lost. But our nation's 40th President has never been measured by the conventional means that we evaluate so many others, and for that reason, this anniversary is better understood. Still, it should come as no surprise that perhaps he alone could secure a place of honor and favor from the aftermath of a bitter election defeat. Can you think of any candidate - for any public office - who has ever shone brighter in defeat than the winner enjoyed in the victory both had hoped to achieve? This is only one of the many reasons that we consider Ronald Reagan to be one of a kind. In 1976, not even a full year after two successful terms as Governor of California, Ronald Reagan challenged President Gerald Ford for the Republican nomination. This was not an easy decision, and one he wrestled with for many months. He believed he would have a chance to win, but he considered the enormity of opposing a sitting President for the nomination of his own party. He feared that the contest, if not successful, could cripple Ford's chances for election - the last thing Reagan wanted to happen. In that primary election, Reagan vigorously debated his differences with Ford on the issues, including taxes, spending, government regulation, the nation's infrastructure and, especially, foreign policy. But in making the case that he, not Ford, should be the GOP choice, he did not tear down the other man. This deserves special mention, for it kept faith with Ronald Reagan's famous 11th Commandment: "Thou shalt not speak ill of any other Republican." The battle between Reagan and Ford was a spirited one. Ford was successful in many early primaries, but after a surprising win in North Carolina, Ronald Reagan scored other victories, and the contest lasted right up to the Republican National Convention in Kansas City. This brought the contest out of the realm of issues and voters and into the sometimes Byzantine world of back-room politics, jousting over the slates of uncommitted delegates who would determine the party's nominee. After all the ballots were tallied, Reagan narrowly lost the nomination, gaining 1,070 delegates to Ford's 1,187. Had Reagan prevailed, he would have been the first candidate in 92 years to wrest the nomination from an incumbent president. Among loyalists to the Reagan campaign, stories abound of delegates who pledged their support to Reagan, but then gave in to arm-twisting and good old-fashioned political threats, and who then threw their crucial support to Ford. Even so, as disappointing as the outcome might have been, Reagan did not hang this unsavory laundry out for public view. He did not even publicly proclaim that he had been short-changed by the process, although there is ample evidence he felt that way. In keeping with the unprecedented nature of these events, on the final night of the convention, after Ford delivered well-received remarks, a spontaneous demonstration ensued for Reagan to address the assembled convention crowd. The newly nominated Ford had no alternative but to ask Reagan to come down to the platform. In that moment, the hardball political atmosphere of the convention was changed to a rarefied air of vision and ideas of which Ronald Reagan has no peer. And his words that night resonated long after the delegates had gone off into the Missouri night. Recalling an English ballad he had memorized as a child, Reagan soothed his supporters with the belief in future triumphs. "Lay me down and bleed awhile," he said. "Though I am wounded, I am not slain. I shall rise and fight again." More importantly, Ronald Reagan was able to see where others could not, presaging an era that would transcend the nuclear stalemate of the Cold War age. He asked the audience that night to look far into the future, and about those a hundred years hence, "Will they say we kept them free?" Presidential historian Michael Beschloss has observed that "The address that everyone remembered that evening was not Ford's, the nominee, but Reagan's, and he tended to overshadow the person who had just gotten the Republican nomination." This was because Ronald Reagan spoke as he always did - from the heart, and directly to the American people. So when another time for choosing arrived four years later, Ronald Reagan was swept into office as our 40th President by a national mandate. And that triumph was due in no small measure to the dignity he showed in defeat and the vision of a better world he fashioned for America on that stage, on that night, in Kansas City. SPECIAL OFFER: It's classic Reagan: This month, we are offering "Speaking My Mind: Selected Speeches by Ronald Reagan" for $29.95. This book is a selection of 55 annotated speeches including his famous "A Time For Choosing" speech on behalf of Barry Goldwater in 1964, his remarks at the Brandenburg Gate in 1987, and his Farewell Address to the Nation in 1989. Each speech is preceded by Ronald Reagan's candid comments on why it was given and under what circumstances. Purchase this selection during August and we will also send you, at no charge, a copy of "The Unfinished Work", our newest video, chronicling the story of his life from childhood to the White House and his legacy at the Reagan Library (a $12.95 value). Just click on the link below, select "Speaking My Mind", and when you are completing the order form, type in the words "Video" in the Comments section of the on-line order form. When we fulfill your order, we will include the free video. http://www.reaganfoundation.org/store/products.asp?subcat_id=39 < A href = "http://www.reaganfoundation.org/store/products.asp?subcat_id=39" >AOL users click here Thank you for your support. Mark Burson Executive Director The Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Foundation 40 Presidential Drive Simi Valley, CA 93065 805-522-2977 http://www.reaganfoundation.org mburson(at)reaganfoundation.org ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Lake Tahoe private Fly-In
In a message dated 08/13/01 01:09:33 Pacific Daylight Time, Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk writes: > Still, I'll let Keith off if he manages to use up the contents of the > cardboard camera in the next two weeks!! That's a pretty big order to fill ... I'll have to take lots of pix of what ever Commander(s) get lured to Las Vegas. Hey! That brings up a good point. Wouldn't it better to get married here, at the Elvis Chapel of Love? Don't forget, you're all brides's maids. The point of this is not to scare you all off (well ... not too much) but to remind you to gather data on Commanders you see parked, as you vist other airports or, when they visit you home 'drome. Sir Barry keeps a data base cross referenced by serial number and N number and often the N numbers change and he needs to know ASAP. Also, any obvious mods you see that you can name are appreciated. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Lake Tahoe private Fly-In
YOU TOOK A PIX WITH YOUR CARDBOARD CAMER FOR BARRY, RIGHT?? jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <tylorh(at)sound.net>
Subject: Re: Photos of Commanders
JB, Do you want photos of the largest collection of 500's??? Central Air operates 38 Twin Commanders and I have seen upwards of 20 or more on the ground at one time at MKC, Downtown Airport, Kansas City. Do you ( or Barry) want photos of them???? Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 -----Original Message----- From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com [mailto:YOURTCFG(at)aol.com] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 5:07 PM To: sharp.r(at)apple.com; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Subject: Re: Lake Tahoe private Fly-In YOU TOOK A PIX WITH YOUR CARDBOARD CAMER FOR BARRY, RIGHT?? jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: ONE MORE
HI KIDS........... Yet another late registered attendee. Luis Allende will be bringing his Shrike. It is the next to the last one built and has been in the family in Argentina since new!! jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Internet connection
Dear sirs, This is to inform you that we have terminated your Internet connection because 1) We have no record of having an agreement with Erotic Environments; 2) The content of your Internet communications is not compatible with what we want to associate our business with; 3) We cannot provide access to the Internet to host web sites or provide streaming (video or audio). If you have any questions please contact me directly at (818) 421-4089. Nico van Niekerk President & CEO CyberSuperStore, Inc. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 2001
From: Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk <Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Photos of Commanders
Hi Tylor et al! I was in Kansas City late last year for a week, with a primary objective of meeting John Towner, the head of Central Air. What a great guy! What an immaculate fleet of Commanders! John told me that if someone had sat down and designed an aeroplane suitable for his business, it would have been an Aero Commander. He is so proud and enthusiastic about them! The cameras were put to full use, but of course many Commanders in his fleet were not at home when I called. So, any photos will be gratefully received and, of course, I am more than happy to pay for any shots. I haven't, shame on me, up-dated my photographic collection database for about 4/5 years(!!), but there's over 5,000 prints/negatives/slides there at the moment, and by the time I add the new ones to it, there's probably going to be around 7,000. In fact, a guy in Australia sadly passed away last year and earlier this year, I bought his collection of Commander slides, being about 650. Thanks guys, your help and support is really very much appreciated. Kindest Regards, Barry C. Tylor Hall commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com cc: 13/08/2001 Subject: RE: Photos of Commanders 23:31 JB, Do you want photos of the largest collection of 500's??? Central Air operates 38 Twin Commanders and I have seen upwards of 20 or more on the ground at one time at MKC, Downtown Airport, Kansas City. Do you ( or Barry) want photos of them???? Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 -----Original Message----- From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com [mailto:YOURTCFG(at)aol.com] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 5:07 PM To: sharp.r(at)apple.com; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Subject: Re: Lake Tahoe private Fly-In YOU TOOK A PIX WITH YOUR CARDBOARD CAMER FOR BARRY, RIGHT?? jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 2001
From: Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk <Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk>
Subject: Re: ONE MORE
Great news, the list is growing and growing. Luis' Commander (500S-3322) has just been placed on the US register as N42ZZ, but at the moment it's showing as "registration pending", no doubt due to a paperwork hitch. It was formerly in Argentina as LV-OAT and before that, had the provisional marks LV-PDY new from the factory. Hopefully, Luis will have some photographs in its Argentine marks !! See you All next week!!! Barry C. YOURTCFG@aol. com To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com cc: 13/08/2001 Subject: ONE MORE 23:59 HI KIDS........... Yet another late registered attendee. Luis Allende will be bringing his Shrike. It is the next to the last one built and has been in the family in Argentina since new!! jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 2001
From: Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk <Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk>
Subject: Roving Reports
Hi All! I'd like to echo Keith's posting - naturally! Of real interest, are those Commanders seen derelict/abandoned around the country. Could well be that they are still listed on the current FAA register, in which case I'm likely to assume they are happily flying around. Reports of any seen in poor shape or with various parts missing etc., will be most welcome. Of course, I know of various airframes bought by the major parts companies, like White Industries, Dodson, Atlanta Air Salvage and Earle Aircraft. If you have a similar facility near you, a report of any Commanders they've got may prove useful. Thanks! Very Best Regards, Barry CloudCraft@ao l.com To: Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk cc: commanderchat@c2-tech.com 13/08/2001 Subject: Re: Lake Tahoe private Fly-In 23:03 In a message dated 08/13/01 01:09:33 Pacific Daylight Time, Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk writes: Still, I'll let Keith off if he manages to use up the contents of the cardboard camera in the next two weeks!! That's a pretty big order to fill ... I'll have to take lots of pix of what ever Commander(s) get lured to Las Vegas. Hey! That brings up a good point. Wouldn't it better to get married here, at the Elvis Chapel of Love? Don't forget, you're all brides's maids. The point of this is not to scare you all off (well ... not too much) but to remind you to gather data on Commanders you see parked, as you vist other airports or, when they visit you home 'drome. Sir Barry keeps a data base cross referenced by serial number and N number and often the N numbers change and he needs to know ASAP. Also, any obvious mods you see that you can name are appreciated. Wing Commander Gordon THIS TRANSMISSION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY If you are not the intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for return. Any distribution or copying of this document by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. Airclaims cannot be held responsible for any alterations made to this document, intentionally or Airclaims Limited, Registered Office: Cardinal Point, Newall Road, Heathrow Airport, Hounslow, Middlesex, TW6 2AS. Company Registration No. 710284 England and Wales. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Roving Reports
In a message dated 8/14/01 2:12:19 AM Pacific Daylight Time, Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk writes: > Of course, I know of various airframes bought by the major parts companies, > like White Industries, Dodson, Atlanta Air Salvage and Earle Aircraft. If > you have a similar facility near you, a report of any Commanders they've > got may prove useful. > WILL DO jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 2001
From: Randy Sharp <sharp.r(at)apple.com>
Subject: Re: ONE MORE
Luis (N42ZZ) is parked directly across from me at RHV. When I get a chance I'll take some photos. I just talked to him yesterday and his Dad is out visiting from Argentina and having a great time in the states. Randy Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk said: >Great news, the list is growing and growing. > >Luis' Commander (500S-3322) has just been placed on the US register as >N42ZZ, but at the moment it's showing as "registration pending", no doubt >due to a paperwork hitch. It was formerly in Argentina as LV-OAT and before >that, had the provisional marks LV-PDY new from the factory. > >Hopefully, Luis will have some photographs in its Argentine marks !! >See you All next week!!! >Barry C. >HI KIDS........... > >Yet another late registered attendee. Luis Allende will be >bringing his Shrike. It is the next to the last one built and has been in >the family in Argentina since new!! jb > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 2001
From: Milt Concannon <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: priceless
2 new fuelcaps $700 1 New fuel pump $750 New fuel hoses $1800 Avionics repairs $Ungodly amount Left engine repair $dont know yet Other trip expenses$ a bunch Getting to spend a day or so with a bunch of Commander degenerates PRICELESS ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: priceless
HI MILT............. You cant put a price on fun!! jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: RIDE FROM SAN DIEGO / LA
HI KIDS.................... Still looking for a ride for two from ether San Diego or LA. anybody? Thanks jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: HYD ACCUMULATOR
HI KIDS................ I am amazed at how much difference little things can make. All summer my accumulator has been a little low and I had noticed the pressure cycling more and more. I was parked next to an FAA King air a couple of days ago and noticed the ground crew was working on the struts so................... Wow, what an improvement 250psi of nitrogen will make. The flaps stay up again for days, no more cycling in flight and the steering is even better. It also was making a kinda rattling noise when I taxied across the grass to my parking spot, but that is gone. Little things! The preparation for the flyin is going well. Aero Air had two of the three projectors I needed so that will help and Sue found a great deal on a coffee maker so we bought one. The food is ordered and I am starting to worry over the little things. Jim Furlong (500A) has volunteered his wife's services to help with the shopping trip and that was greatly appreciated. I am working on a great award for Swede Ralston. It is a lifetime acheivmet award, and I had a hand made stained glass Commander made to mount on a thophy base, will be really cool and he is a really cool guy. hope all is well in "Commanderland" jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 2001
From: Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk <Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk>
Subject: Hillsboro
Hi gang! If anybody attending Hillsboro will have a lap-top with them, running say FoxPro or Access, please let me know. I'll then burn a copy of my Commander database on a CD-ROM and bring it with me. Then if anyone wants to see the history of a specific Commander, we can look at it. For those who are attending, I'll bring a printed copy of your Commander's history with me. Capt Jimbob has sent me a list of attendees, but if you want to check with me, please do so. Also, I mentioned yesterday that it's sometimes difficult to know whether a Commander, although listed on the current FAA database, is actually still around. Well, I did a trawl of my database last night and found 270 Commanders listed, which shouldn't be! A breakdown follows: Not built : 9 Destroyed : 105 (includes damaged beyond repair or destroyed by fire) Exported : 71 Retired : 85 Additionally, there's another 80-odd with paperwork problems holding up present owners being properly registered. Add the ones whose history is surrounded in mystique through hauling white powder around, and you can see what fun it all is, piecing things together! I really do need to get out more. Kindest Regards, Barry C. THIS TRANSMISSION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY If you are not the intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for return. Any distribution or copying of this document by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. Airclaims cannot be held responsible for any alterations made to this document, intentionally or Airclaims Limited, Registered Office: Cardinal Point, Newall Road, Heathrow Airport, Hounslow, Middlesex, TW6 2AS. Company Registration No. 710284 England and Wales. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: TWO MORE
HI KIDS........... We have a couple more late registers. Ed and Sherry Blair will be bringing up a 680FLP (the old "Black Bird") with its new paint and interior. They will be leaving from Reno (I think) Also, got my starter problem fixed. It was $40 deal and took only about an hour, a mere stitch in time as Commanders go! It needed a new seal at the drive end (Just like uncle Harry told me) I am amazed at the engineering on some of these things. The starter depends on the tightness of the seal to allow the jaws to engage the engine, I think that is crazy, but I guise they work more often than not. New seal, no problem!! jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: ANOTHER ONE
HI KIDS....... Well, it looks like another small group. Jack Chappell will be coming up with two others. I called him tonight to order up a #4 exhaust pipe and he told me he had been planing to come but just hadn't "got around to calling" I told him he just about ended up eating a Macdonld's burger. I need to give the caterer the final headcount Saturday, so if anyone is coming but hasn't let me know, PLEASE let me know. Thanks. PS Jack has the largest inventory of old Commander parts west of the Mississippi, call him at 909-371-7413. I have bought several bits from him and they have all been just what he said they would be. He also owns the last 560E built jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 16, 2001
From: Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk <Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk>
Subject: Re: TWO MORE
Ed & Sherry Blair? Thank goodness it's not Tony & Cherie Blair - otherwise I would have cancelled my trip !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Barry C. YOURTCFG@aol. com To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com cc: 16/08/2001 Subject: TWO MORE 02:22 HI KIDS........... We have a couple more late registers. Ed and Sherry Blair will be bringing up a 680FLP (the old "Black Bird") with its new paint and interior. They will be leaving from Reno (I think) Also, got my starter problem fixed. It was $40 deal and took only about an hour, a mere stitch in time as Commanders go! It needed a new seal at the drive end (Just like uncle Harry told me) I am amazed at the engineering on some of these things. The starter depends on the tightness of the seal to allow the jaws to engage the engine, I think that is crazy, but I guise they work more often than not. New seal, no problem!! jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 16, 2001
From: John Vormbaum <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: TWO MORE
What, you would be jealous if someone else were representing the Crown (irrespective of the quality of their representation)? ----- Original Message ----- From: <Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk> To: Cc: Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 1:19 AM Subject: Re: TWO MORE > > Ed & Sherry Blair? > > Thank goodness it's not Tony & Cherie Blair - otherwise I would have > cancelled my trip !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > Barry C. > > > YOURTCFG@aol. > com To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com > cc: > 16/08/2001 Subject: TWO MORE > 02:22 > > > HI KIDS........... > > We have a couple more late registers. Ed and Sherry Blair will > be bringing up a 680FLP (the old "Black Bird") with its new paint and > interior. They will be leaving from Reno (I think) > Also, got my starter problem fixed. It was $40 deal and took only > about an hour, a mere stitch in time as Commanders go! It needed a new > seal > at the drive end (Just like uncle Harry told me) I am amazed at the > engineering on some of these things. The starter depends on the tightness > of > the seal to allow the jaws to engage the engine, I think that is crazy, but > I > guise they work more often than not. New seal, no problem!! jb > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 16, 2001
From: res00rbl <res00rbl(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: TWO MORE
I know how you feel, Barry. It's almost as scary as Jimbo saying a "Bill & Hill" are attending. Sends shivers up & down the spine, doesn't it? Jim Jorgensen PS - They could bring Mark Rich & the cocaine dealer he pardoned, as well! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 16, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: New list member
[FWD] Dan Brady AC-500(250 lycs) Based at Tiger Field Fernley NV. 775 575 6822 valbrady(at)thegrid.net Purchased in '87 Still struggling with ADs&Mods to make our retirement dream come true. Spent many hrs. thru '60s into '70s flying 520,560,560e, 680s &680e models. Also a few hrs. in turbine. It's much harder to maintain financial stability when you're trying to fly for pleasure as opposed to revenue. I'd like to hear from fellow AC lovers. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 16, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: New list member
In a message dated 8/16/2001 4:39:12 PM Pacific Daylight Time, chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com writes: > Purchased in '87 Still struggling with > ADs&Mods to make our retirement > dream come true. Spent many hrs. > thru '60s into '70s flying 520,560,560e, > 680s &680e models. Also a few hrs. in > turbine. It's much harder to maintain > financial stability when you're trying to > fly for pleasure as opposed to revenue. > I'd like to hear from fellow AC lovers HI DAN. I really know what you mean. You just need to remember that the airplane may be 40+ years old but in its time, it was the best corporate chariot money could buy. These were 1959 lear jets and if you look at the ads that Commander ran over the years, it is clear who the were selling to. We now buy them and wonder why they can be expensive to maintain. They are still an exotic, corporate airplane. The good news is that when you get finished, you will have a great airplane that will last you a lifetime. You will be treated to a level of comfort and safety that few pilots will ever enjoy. You already know this from your past experience. Stay tuned in to the list, we are here to help and have a ton of experience. Good luck and hang in there. Jim Metzger (capt jimbob or jb) Director, Twin Commander Flight Group ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 16, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: RNCP
If you go through your first hurricane(and it fizzles out)and you then put thirty house-plants in the back of a dooly(duelly for you new comers)then drive for seven hours at 75.5 mph so you can at least see what it might have looked like,you might be a RED-NECKED COMMANDER PILOT! BIG AL Hey Gang,this move has been rough on the kid,but it's all over except getting Lucille relocated.Truly sorry I can't come out and play,but Clark started his training on the 717 this week and will not be through for two more weeks.If ya'll don't mind I sure would like some photos. Happy flying to all!!! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 16, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: RNCP
Glad you have the move behind you, we will look forward to meeting you at next years "east coast" event!! jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 2001
From: nico <nico(at)insdaq.com>
Subject: STRANGE COMMANDER
---------- From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2001 10:25 AM To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Subject: STRANGE COMMANDER HI KIDS............ Made my commute to work the other day and found a strange Commander parked in my area. It is a 1000 with what are best described as mini torpedoes mounted on each side of the fuselage about abeam the main gear. I cant remember the N number 808NC I think?? (Yes, I tool a picture with my cardboard camera for Barry) My old Commander is really running sweet, must be that steady diet of Marvel Mystery Oil and Money I feed it!! Still leaks a some oil ! #*>##@>! Hope all is well in Commanderland. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 2001
From: MRPOULIN27(at)aol.com <MRPOULIN27(at)aol.com>
Subject: One Less 685
Hello guys, It looks like a "no go" with the plane. Too much going on I guess. I'll still be arriving on Thursday evening less my plane, and friends. Sorry for the late notice Jim. Also, if I could bum a ride with someone the day we go to TCAC, it would be greatly appreciated. I look forward to seeing all of you! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 19, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: STRANGE COMMANDER
In a message dated 08/18/01 10:29:36 Pacific Daylight Time, YOURTCFG(at)aol.com writes: > > > Made my commute to work the other day and found a strange > Commander parked in my area. It is a 1000 with what are best described as > mini torpedoes mounted on each side of the fuselage about abeam the main > gear. Not so strange, really. Those are "slipper tanks" and have been hung on 690s through the 1000s. They add 300 pounds of fuel or so (can't remember the exact amount), reduce cruise speed about 10 knots. Not too bad of a trade off. I've seen many of these -- and every once in a while, if I look closely, can see where they've been installed and removed. These tanks are especially useful for oceanic work, whether it be North Atlantic, Western Pacific or Caribbean (don't ask, don't tell). Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 19, 2001
From: w.bow <w.bow(at)att.net>
Subject: mini-torpedoes
If it was a 500A like mine, maybe they were JATO Bottles. bilbo ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 19, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: STRANGE COMMANDER
HI KEITH........ Nice try but no cigar. These things were to small to be gas tanks and the slipper tanks mount on the wings. These were sticking out of the fuselage?? jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 19, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: STRANGE COMMANDER
In a message dated 08/19/01 21:46:31 Pacific Daylight Time, YOURTCFG writes: > Nice try but no cigar. These things were to small to be gas > tanks and the slipper tanks mount on the wings. These were sticking out of > the fuselage?? The plot thickens. Was the aircraft in "Restricted" category? May be a geophysical sensor package ... or one of the FBI / DEA's Commander 1000s with SLIR. If the latter was the case, the same bromide applies. "Don't ask, don't tell." Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 20, 2001
From: Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk <Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk>
Subject: Re: STRANGE COMMANDER
Hi Gang! I think that strange Commander was N808NC and it is a Model 695A which has been converted to a 695B, serial 96085. It is registered to Wilmington Trust Company as Trustee, on behalf of a German Trustor, Aero-Sensing Radarsysteme GmbH., and as far as I know, is being operated by a UK concern, Cooper Aerial Surveys Ltd. I know Gerry Cooper modified another of his Turbo Commanders to map by radar, and would imagine that this Commander has now been similarly modified. Hopefully, the cardboard camera image will confirm this to me. But, thanks Capt Jimbob, these reports are always of interest! Best Regards, Barry C. YOURTCFG@aol. com To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com cc: 18/08/2001 Subject: STRANGE COMMANDER 18:25 HI KIDS............ Made my commute to work the other day and found a strange Commander parked in my area. It is a 1000 with what are best described as mini torpedoes mounted on each side of the fuselage about abeam the main gear. I cant remember the N number 808NC I think?? (Yes, I tool a picture with my cardboard camera for Barry) My old Commander is really running sweet, must be that steady diet of Marvel Mystery Oil and Money I feed it!! Still leaks a some oil ! #*>##@>! Hope all is well in Commanderland. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 20, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Re: STRANGE COMMANDER
YOURTCFG(at)aol.com wrote: > These things were to small to be > gas tanks and the slipper tanks mount on the wings. These were sticking > out of the fuselage?? jb The DEA has a Commander with various "sneaky toys" including FLIR, special night-vision cameras and some other unidentified gadgets. Did you happen to notice if it had some odd antennas on it? Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 20, 2001
From: Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk <Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk>
Subject: The Strange Commander
Hi Gang! OK. I've just checked with Cooper Aerial Surveys Limited, who are based at Gamston Airport, Nottinghamshire, in England. They do indeed operate N808NC, and it is confirmed that the pods are for mapping by radar. I'll try and dig out some photos I've got at home of a 690A, which if I remember correctly is N91384, which has also got the same equipment. Again, if I remember correctly, the pods, two one side and one the other, are mounted on the ends of a single beam which traverses the fuselage just behind the cockpit area, at about floor level. I'll bring the pictures with me to Hillsboro. Gerry Cooper tells me the definition they get is extremely good. They couldn't mount the pods directly onto the sides of the fuselage, because being pressurized, any small movement of the fuselage sides would have destroyed the definition. Similar equipment has been used before, but I understand not on a pressurized aircraft. Another 'first' for the ubiquitous Aero Commander? Best Regards, Barry C. THIS TRANSMISSION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY If you are not the intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for return. Any distribution or copying of this document by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. Airclaims cannot be held responsible for any alterations made to this document, intentionally or Airclaims Limited, Registered Office: Cardinal Point, Newall Road, Heathrow Airport, Hounslow, Middlesex, TW6 2AS. Company Registration No. 710284 England and Wales. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 20, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: The Strange Commander
THANKS BARRY............. Another mystery solved!! See you soon. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 20, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Rncp
If you think your plane suddenly grew slipper tanks,then you remember overtaking a 150 while on final,you might be a RED-NECKED COMMANDER PILOT! BIG AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 20, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: IT' THIS WEEK!
HI KIDS.. I just finished a really busy week of flying the biplane and will be crawling into the left seat of triple two in a few minutes. I may need to drive back tomorrow to pick up Richard but don't want to get weathered in here. Anyone else want an air to air of their Commander?? The photographer is hear, spent the night on the boat with me (Took the very best photos ever of the biplane on the way home yesterday, they are amazing!!) Let me know. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 20, 2001
From: Milt <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Pets
Jimbob Gail wants to know if we get to meet Rocy and the Iguana? Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 21, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: GOT EM
HI KIDS......... Just got back from picking up Richard and Jackie Thompson, Great folks!! Jim Raeder (the photographer) and I brought the Commander back to SEA between IFR spots, lousy weather, rain all the way. Supposed to dry up tomorrow????? We talked Commanders for the last three hours. Had dinner with Tyler Hall. He is in town moving his daughter into new digs. He will be at the event. Also, Keith Gordon will be there!! He is coming with Randy Dunn in his 690A Jim Carroll will be driving down from SEA. He is looking for his first Commander. Dick Polits will be there with his father. I think the head count will be 70+. I should have a final by Thursday. Thanks to everybody!! jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 22, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: We're comin'!
Good news! 680E and I will be able to attend. Anyone from the Bay Area headed that way?? Would love to gaggle up with someone on Friday. One concern is the WX. Don't have my IFR ticket yet so I hope it's not a problem. Isn't it supposed to be summer???? Barry Hancock Precision Flight Networks (949) 300-5510 bdogltd(at)pacbell.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 22, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Lucille
Hey Gang,Last offer to the group for the adoption of Lucille before she goes to the broker,which translates into costing more and some non-believer getting his mitts on a truly one of a kind bird.When the weekend rolls around,just ask Milt about the ole gal,and in the meantime I will be getting a spec sheet ready to send to anyone who is seriosly interested!Ya'll enjoy!!!!! Al P.S. If you want to know just how rare she is,just ask Harry Merritt. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 22, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Wingtips available cheap!
FYI, There is a pair of nice Commander wing tips listed on ebay. Current price is $9, so if you need a pair.... ya ain't gonna get 'em much cheaper. Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 22, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: We're comin'!
To all that have replied. I'd be delighted to hook up and will contact each of you who responded. Can you imagine a 4 ship echelon of Commanders doing a 3 second break on arrival at HIO? Maybe the TCFG needs to become a F.A.S.T member! :) Hey, if the Bonanza guys can do it..... At this point I'm planning to come to the Bay Area Thurs. pm and leave for HIO Friday whenever we can coordinate departure. Looking forward to this for sure! Barry Hancock Precision Flight Networks (949) 300-5510 bdogltd(at)pacbell.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 23, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: hitting the air
Just got word that Milt has departed Gulfport. He's picking up Tillman and "little Crunk" before getting to Tulsa to pick up Kim and I. The plan (subject to change of course) is that to Boise ID. Probably stay in Boise and get to HIO fairly early Fri. My thanks to "Milt's travel service for the Commanderless"! Looking forward to seeing everyone! Chris Schuermann ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 23, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <tylorh(at)sound.net>
Subject: Rides for the Commanderless?
Hay Gang, I am stuck-in-Seattle. Anyone going south on Friday? Air or ground? Cell Phone is 913-485-3799. I am willing to help with cost of gas. Thanks, Tylor Hall ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 23, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: hitting the air
YIPPIE!!!!!!!!!!!! Yall fly safe now, Ya hear!! jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 23, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: stranded in Tulsa
Well folks, we're gonna be a bit late getting to HIO tomorrow, but I think we'll overcome the obstacles in our path. Oh, do we have stories to tell! Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 26, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: THANKS EVERYBODY
As I write this dozens of very special people are winging their way home. They are in the care of a great airplane at this very moment. Thanks to all. To the Aussies who have such a great attitude about life and traveled so far, Thank you. To Jim Furlong who's kind words were an inspiration and just what I needed, Thank you. To Morris Kernick and the Commander services crew, Thank you. To Milt Concannon, Chris Schuermann and all the "Southern crew" Thank you. To Gary Tillman, the fastest talking insurance salesman I ever met, Thank you. To Dick Wartinger and Commander Aero, Thank you. To Mike and Randi for the great gifts, Thank you. To TCAC for loaning us Jeffery Pence (sp) for a great talk, Thank you. To Kevin, Ken, Scott, Lori and all the great people at Aero Air, Thank you. To Swede Ralston for the great stories, Thank you. To wing Commander Gordon and Randy for coming so far just to say hi, Thank you. To Barry Collman for, well, everything, Thank you. To all those who attended, I am humbled by your kind words and your passion for these great airplanes, Thank you. Thank you all from the bottom of my heart. It was such a thrill to meet all of you and to put faces with the names. God speed to all of you and my prayers for a safe journey are with you. Remember, "The good Lord never built a low wing bird" PS, If I have forgotten anyone please forgive me. In Christ Capt jimbob ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 26, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: THANKS EVERYBODY
As I write this dozens of very special people are winging their way home. They are in the care of a great airplane at this very moment. Thanks to all. No Jim, THANK YOU!! What a wonderful event. 680E is back safely at SNA after a 4:48 flight...longest single leg in my young career. Will write more later but thanks to all of you for coming and sharing your passion. This was definitely an event to build on! Jim, you can form up on my wing any time...just don't get sucked on takeoff! :) ...only wish more had been there to see it...wish *I* could have seen it from the ground for that matter. Damn I love these airplanes! I feel blessed to be a part of such a wonderful community that is the TCFG. Cheers, Barry Hancock Precision Flight Networks (949) 300-5510 bdogltd(at)pacbell.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 26, 2001
From: John Vormbaum <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: THANKS EVERYBODY
Capt. Jimbob (and ALL!), I'm sitting here safely at home (after a fine 3-hr. formation flight with Dennis Polito & Barry Hancock [and Morris & the Commander Services crew!]), still smiling ear-to-ear and thinking about all the faces I was finally able to put to names, and all the new friends I now have. I can't imagine how this weekend could have been any better. I have many, many new reasons to consider myself lucky, and they don't necessarily have anything to do with Aero Commanders other than the fact that the ownership of one connected me to all of you. Jim & Sue, I think I speak for all of us attendees when I say that you did a FANTASTIC job in making us feel welcome and further stoking the fires of our enthusiasm for these fine airplanes! Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you for working so hard to make this event the best ever (not that *I* know, I got that from people who've been to several over the last decade). I can't wait to fly across the country for next year's event! Also, thanks to Kevin, Swede & all at Aero Air who created such a hospitable Commander-friendly atmosphere for the weekend! Cheers to all, and see you on the chatlist.... /John PS: I do owe one serious apology: Sir Barry, please forgive me for a) blasting out of HIO without a proper goodbye, and b) not sitting still for the ONLY request you've made of me ever.....one single, simple picture with my airplane. Forgive me and please let me buy you a pint at our next meeting.....my departure was extremely bad form. ----- Original Message ----- From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 3:38 PM Subject: THANKS EVERYBODY As I write this dozens of very special people are winging their way home. They are in the care of a great airplane at this very moment. Thanks to all. To the Aussies who have such a great attitude about life and traveled so far, Thank you. To Jim Furlong who's kind words were an inspiration and just what I needed, Thank you. To Morris Kernick and the Commander services crew, Thank you. To Milt Concannon, Chris Schuermann and all the "Southern crew" Thank you. To Gary Tillman, the fastest talking insurance salesman I ever met, Thank you. To Dick Wartinger and Commander Aero, Thank you. To Mike and Randi for the great gifts, Thank you. To TCAC for loaning us Jeffery Pence (sp) for a great talk, Thank you. To Kevin, Ken, Scott, Lori and all the great people at Aero Air, Thank you. To Swede Ralston for the great stories, Thank you. To wing Commander Gordon and Randy for coming so far just to say hi, Thank you. To Barry Collman for, well, everything, Thank you. To all those who attended, I am humbled by your kind words and your passion for these great airplanes, Thank you. Thank you all from the bottom of my heart. It was such a thrill to meet all of you and to put faces with the names. God speed to all of you and my prayers for a safe journey are with you. Remember, "The good Lord never built a low wing bird" PS, If I have forgotten anyone please forgive me. In Christ Capt jimbob ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 27, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: [Here's one for you!]
If anyone can help this person, please reply to him directly chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 27, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: HIO Flyin
Folks, I'll keep this short, but the HIO flyin was the single finest gathering that I have EVER attended. I have never had so much fun and met so many truely fine people. Capt Jimbob set a new standard of greatness which will be hard to ever exceed! There are too many people to show appreciation to for this email, but my personal thanks to Milt Concannon and his wonderful wife for transporting Kim and I in style to HIO. I will put a detailed report (with MANY pictures) up on the web site as soon as I can and will let the group know when it's up. Chris Schuermann ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 27, 2001
From: Randy Sharp <sharp.r(at)apple.com>
Subject: Re: THANKS EVERYBODY
Thanks Capt jimbob for such a great time! I know how hard it is to put one of these gatherings together and you did a very classy job. I echo your comments below. ps I have taken quite a few photos of everyone on their best behavior, so I'll try to put them up on a web site as soon as possible. (email to follow for the site location) regards, Randy Sharp YOURTCFG(at)aol.com said: >As I write this dozens of very special people are winging their way home. >They are in the care of a great airplane at this very moment. Thanks to all. > To the Aussies who have such a great attitude about life and traveled >so far, Thank you. To Jim Furlong who's kind words were an inspiration and >just what I needed, Thank you. To Morris Kernick and the Commander services >crew, Thank you. To Milt Concannon, Chris Schuermann and all the "Southern >crew" Thank you. To Gary Tillman, the fastest talking insurance salesman I >ever met, Thank you. To Dick Wartinger and Commander Aero, Thank you. To >Mike and Randi for the great gifts, Thank you. To TCAC for loaning us >Jeffery Pence (sp) for a great talk, Thank you. To Kevin, Ken, Scott, Lori >and all the great people at Aero Air, Thank you. To Swede Ralston for the >great stories, Thank you. To wing Commander Gordon and Randy for coming so >far just to say hi, Thank you. To Barry Collman for, well, everything, Thank >you. To all those who attended, I am humbled by your kind words and your >passion for these great airplanes, Thank you. Thank you all from the bottom >of my heart. > It was such a thrill to meet all of you and to put faces with the >names. God speed to all of you and my prayers for a safe journey are with >you. Remember, "The good Lord never built a low wing bird" > PS, If I have forgotten anyone please forgive me. In Christ Capt >jimbob > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 27, 2001
From: nico van niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Vantug
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 27, 2001
From: TILLMAN333(at)aol.com <TILLMAN333(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: THANKS EVERYBODY- Hi Y'all
Hi- 'Yall I'm back in Rome, Ga. Slept in the pilots lounge at Tulsa International...Thanks to Mercury Aviation... A courtesy car and a 1 am breakfast at Denny's...The privileges of being a pilot are like non other... Really...it was a blast... The ride from Tulsa to DFW and then to BNA was non-eventful. The Commander was fueled and ready to go at Signature BNA. Broken to Over cast across the mountains, requested the visual from Atlanta CTR. No problem...cleared for the visual. Cancelled IFR and SQUAWKED 1200... Home Again. Indeed it was a great time, had by all... Thanks to all who attended...24 hours in a 685 was really worth it. Thanks Dr. Milt.... Y'all Come. Fly Safe and remember the IPC and BFR in your plane...not a Cessna 150... Or, heaven forbid, a low wing...I know God never built a bird with the wings on the bottom... Thanks for a great time... Gary Tillman ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 28, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: FLYIN TRIP REPORT UP!
Everyone, I just finished putting up a "trip report" with many pictures. For those who didn't attend, this is "must read" stuff. For those who did, hopefully you will have fond memories while reading... http://www.aerocommander.com/TCFG/2001flyin/index2.html Sincerely, Chris Schuermann ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 28, 2001
From: John Vormbaum <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: FLYIN TRIP REPORT UP!
Chris, Thanks for the fantastic report! I've been smiling and laughing for the last 15 minutes as I relived one of the best weekends ever. Seeing the pictures again reinforces my feeling that this is truly a wonderful group of people. I'm glad to be a part of it! Thanks also for your hard work, server space, and never-waning support of all of us & our airplanes!!!! Great meeting you, and I'm looking forward to next year's flyin! /John ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Schuermann" <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com> To: Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:23 AM Subject: FLYIN TRIP REPORT UP! > Everyone, > I just finished putting up a "trip report" with many pictures. > For those who didn't attend, this is "must read" stuff. For those > who did, hopefully you will have fond memories while reading... > > http://www.aerocommander.com/TCFG/2001flyin/index2.html > > > Sincerely, > Chris Schuermann > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 28, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <thall5(at)kc.rr.com>
Subject: 4 engine 680E's
Hi Gang, I too am back home and I find everything is up to date in Kansas City. Wow, what a week-end!!! Meeting old and new friends and Internet friends. Chris, good report. I looked at every photo. JimBob. You know how to put on a great party. We all are looking forward to the next one. Thanks go out to Aero Air, Kevin, and Swede. Great organization and good support. I am totally amazed that on late Saturday afternoon, Dr. Milts 685 was fixed in hours. I had just found out that there was a problem walking through the hangar and was asking Ken Molczan about it when the welder walked in with the part, fixed. The Mechanic grabbed it and started putting it back together. Unbelievable service. Russell (AU) and I were that last ones on the ground after every one had left. We had the great opportunity to witness the departure of two 680Es in formation. A sound not often heard. What a SOUND!!! I have photos to prove it. I just got back from dropping them off to be processed. On Monday, JB came to HIO to pick Russell and me up to take us to PDX. Thanks Jim. We heard him long before we saw him. Russell got a chance to sit right seat with Sir Barry and I in the back. I am amazed at how far Russell and Sir Barry came to attend a one day event. Russell was on his way to LAX and a 20 hour flight to Sidney. He will not be back in Darwin, NWT until Thursday some time. He will spend twice the amount of time on airliners coming and going than at the meeting. That is a large amount of interest from someone who does not own a Commander yet. It will not be long though. He has his eye on a 560. It was great meeting everyone and seeing lots of Twin Commanders. Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 28, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: 4 engine 680E's
Tylor, AWESOME. And here I was pouting that I couldn't see it from the ground. I would love a copy of the photos when they get back!Wish you had a tape recorder to get the sound too! Great meeting you as well. As the Aussies would say "good on ya!" Barry Russell (AU) and I were that last ones on the ground after every one had left. We had the great opportunity to witness the departure of two 680E's in formation. A sound not often heard. What a SOUND!!! I have photos to prove it. I just got back from dropping them off to be processed. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 28, 2001
From: Randy Sharp <sharp.r(at)apple.com>
Subject: Re: FLYIN TRIP REPORT UP!
Chris, The photos and write-ups on your website are fantastic! I have some photos posted as well but unedited and with no commentaries. Hope you enjoy... http://homepage.mac.com/rotors_and_wings/PhotoAlbum1.html ps there are multiple sections to select due to the quantity of photos and more to follow. (more than 130) Regards, Randy chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com said: >Everyone, >I just finished putting up a "trip report" with many pictures. >For those who didn't attend, this is "must read" stuff. For those >who did, hopefully you will have fond memories while reading... > >http://www.aerocommander.com/TCFG/2001flyin/index2.html >Sincerely, >Chris Schuermann ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 28, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: FLYIN TRIP REPORT UP!
Ohh sure! Show off your bitchin' panel to make us all *jealous*! Well, at least you made *me* jealous! Anyone want to donate $30K to the 680E avionics fund? No? And I thought this was a great community.... :) Thanks for all the pics, everyone. I must say that, even though I have only been to fly-ins in the warbird community, this fly-in was top notch. I am very fortunate to fly a warbird (Nanchang CJ-6A) where we all get along and help each other despite background or status - most if not all other warbird groups are not like that. The Commander group has impressed me as having the same qualities. What a wonderfully enthusiastic and pleasant bunch! I'm guessing the TCFG is as unique in this aspect in GA is the Yak Pilots Association is in the warbird community. Speaking of which, I thought I'd throw this one out there... With 2003 approaching fast, and the AC's having such a distinguished place in aviation history. It seems appropriate that we have a formation of Commanders at OSH and the Dayton event that same year. Formation flying is not for everyone, but if there are a few among us qualified/willing to teach it we could make it happen.... If there is sufficient interest I will persue what it would take. I just hate the thought of being out done by Bonanza drivers! (no offense intended - clearly a Commander owner who has/had a Bonanza is a different breed than the average Bonanza driver). Barry Hancock Precision Flight Networks (949) 300-5510 bdogltd(at)pacbell.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 29, 2001
From: Jim Crunkleton <crunk12(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: HIO
Hi Everyone, Just wanted to reiterate Chris' thoughts by saying THANKS to all for a great weekend. It was a pleasure to meet and talk with you and I sincerely appreciated being able to attend on my dad's behalf. Another special thank you to Captain Jim Bob and his wife for their hard work in organizing the event, and most importantly for me.... THANK YOU!! -- Dr. Concannon for letting me ride along and operate your beautiful airplane! I will send you the paper where I wrote "Thank you" one thousand times tomorrow!!! (along with -- "I will not leave an oil cap off of your engine ever again!" -- You wanted that one five thousand times, if my memory serves me correct.) And to the rest of the deep south crew -- Gail, Gary, Chris and Kim -- Thanks -- 20 hours in an aluminum tube together -- and none of you threw me out in flight!! Cordially, Don "Little Crunk" Crunkleton ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 29, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: NEXT YEAR
HI KIDS................... WOW, what a great bunch you all are. Thanks so much for the kind words!!! I know that the dust is just settling from this years event but I want to start planning the 2002 gathering. As promised, it will be on the East coat this time. I am pretty hard over on the event being held at a Commander place, probably a Service Center. The choices seem to be Eagle Creek Aviation, Indianapolis, IN, Northeast air, Portland Maine, Corporate Flight, Smyrna, TN or Banyan Air, FT. Lauderdale. Other suggestions???? Barry suggested that we pick a weekend and hold the event on that weekend every year (except 2003 when we will corodinat the flyin, and arival of 100 Commanders, to coincide with the celebration in Dayton at Commander Aero). I really like that idea and think the third weekend in SEP or the first weekend in OCT would be good????? Let me know what you think. This will of course depend on the service center having us, we are a bit "renegade" for them!! Sue and I have identified several things to do differently next time that should make the event better for you and we are always open to any suggestion you might have. Thanks again for a great event, without you, it sure would have been lonely!!!!!!! jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 29, 2001
From: Jim Crunkleton <crunk12(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: HIO
Hi Everyone, Just wanted to reiterate Chris' thoughts by saying THANKS to all for a great weekend. It was a pleasure to meet and talk with you and I sincerely appreciated being able to attend on my dad's behalf. Another special thank you to Captain Jim Bob and his wife for their hard work in organizing the event, and most importantly for me.... THANK YOU!! -- Dr. Concannon for letting me ride along and operate your beautiful airplane! I will send you the paper where I wrote "Thank you" one thousand times tomorrow!!! (along with -- "I will not leave an oil cap off of your engine ever again!" -- You wanted that one five thousand times, if my memory serves me correct.) And to the rest of the deep south crew -- Gail, Gary, Chris and Kim -- Thanks -- 20 hours in an aluminum tube together -- and none of you threw me out in flight!! Cordially, Don "Little Crunk" Crunkleton ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 29, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: HEY BUDDY??
BUDDY WINDHAM........... I have some interesting info concerning your conversion but don't have your email address. Please contact me. Thanks. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 29, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Echo Echo echo echo ...
I have to echo everything that's already been written about our Fly-In. I was really thrilled to meet many of you who I've only known via this email net. To reunite with some of my old Commander pals was a compulsory maneuver. Thanks to all who flew in via your Commanders and those who braved the airlines. Well done! I regret having to leave so early because there are a number of you I wanted to sit with and get to know. But! At least I was able to be the co-recipient of the coveted Golden Pedal Award. That made my treasonous sneak away from Falcon duty all worth it. The only thing I think needs to be added to the many compliments and the monuments on Chris and Randy's web sites is a belated award going to Dr. Milt Concannon for "Wackiest Shirt." Next Fly-In, I'm coming with one of those eeeeegwanas and one of those shirts they-all wear in Mississippi. Thanks for everything, Capt. Jimbob. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 29, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: STATUS
Guys, We had a bit of a snag in the mail server. I'm terribly sorry as I think several messages sent over the last few days may not have been delivered. Although I believe I have things un-stuck now, I'd like to hear back from one or two of you (directly to me, not the list) that you received THIS message. Thanks, Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 29, 2001
From: Russell Legg <rlegg(at)austarnet.com.au>
Subject: Honey I'm Home!!
Gday to all in Commanderland! Glad to here that everyone got back safely. Just arrived home in Katherine this morning (Thurs) after routing Hillsboro-PDX, 20min with CaptJimbob and N222JS, PDX-LAX (2.5hrs, 737-500 United N920UA), LAX-SYD (15hrs...we had head winds... 747-400 United N175UA), SYD-ASP (3hrs, 737-400 Ansett VH-CZU), ASP-DRW(2hrs, 737-400 Ansett VH-CZU) and DRW-KTR (1hr, Metroliner Air North VH-HCB)... not too jet-lagged and with fond memories of the weekend swirling around in this little Ossies grey matter. Tylor and I stayed on at Best Western Hillsboro on Sunday night, shot the breeze and talked Commanders at length. We walked over to the Hillsboro terminal on Monday morning and were greeted with the sounds of ol triple 2 announcing its arrival to come and pick us up...long before we could see it. Jimbob kindly ferried Sir Barry and the two of us over to PDX pulling in at the Flightcraft facility at approx 11.50am. Before leaving PDX on Monday afternoon Sir Barry and I had a great opportunity to have lunch and reflect on another great week-end in Commanderland. Barry had Fish & Chips and I had the Sushi and over that lunch we regularly found ourselves in fits of laughter around the adventures of the weekend. I filled Sir Barry in on the scope of that last take-off for the 2001 TCFG Fly-in...he was sitting in 222JS looking across at 680E... Sir Barry had been hastily scrambled at the last minute while trying to line up John Vormbaum for a photo shoot in front of JohnCharlieCharlie! As Barry H and Captain Jimbob taxied out, Tylor and I glumly realised that we were the gate-keepers and the end had come! And then there was that departure! Barry and Jimbob you did just great... The very least I expected of my weekend at Hillsboro was to witness a four-engine Commander take-off. Guys your stream take-off was very professional and sounded like four geared lycomings at take-off db, in the same space... Just awesome. For Tylor and I it was well worth the loneliness of gate-keeping... But be put on notice... Next year a tape-recorder must be available! I enjoyed a fabulous time throughout the weekend and add my most sincere thanks to Jimbob and Sue for their great organisational efforts. Guys you should go into professional convention organising! A big thankyou to all those who succeeded in translating my accent. It was great to meet you all and talk about so many future possibilities. Well done Chris on your write-up... A very pleasant surprise to find it up and running so quickly. Good morning all... Another great weekend in Commanderland for this lil Ossie! Cheers and Beers Russell The proud holder of the 2001 TCFG Longest Distance Travelled Award. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 30, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)acu.org>
Subject: Genocide in Zimbabwe. Are we to blame also?
Forward to your friends, please. It is a weird, wicked world we live in. In Zimbabwe the illegal occupation of farm land has resumed, only a few weeks after international pressure forced President Mugabe to ease off with the criminal occupation of the farmers' land. Whether one believes that the land traditionally belongs to the blacks or not, is not the point here. What we do know is that the land was not stolen but legally purchased and paid for and, here is the crux of the matter, that country's laws recognize their land ownership. That being the case, the laws of the country should dictate how the land passes from one owner to another, not the emotional attack of a despot who clings to power by criminal means. Criminal in various ways. It is criminal if one disobeys the laws that one is supposed to uphold as the president. It is criminal to willfully cripple one's country's ability to produce food. It is criminal to kill people because they disagree with you. There are so many criminal acts committed in Zimbabwe, all to assure a victory for Mugabe in the next elections. And he knows that he can achieve that by two means, namely, intimidation of the general population, and giving those, who have no inclination to work for a living, free land. What these new 'owners' would do with that land is probably of no concern to Mugabe. Farms and ranches have to be economical units. If you cut them up in pieces that are too small, they become nothing more than subsistence plots, at best able to support those who live on them, if they work at it. This means no food for the urban population, over grazing, no sewer and water services, erosion, disease, and eventually the green lush vegetation of the region would become barren. The topsoil would blow away taking away even the subsistence ability of the soil. What now has the potential of being a food exporting region, would look like the Sudan, Ethiopia and other countries where subsistence farming has failed and damaged their countries for centuries. But Mugabe doesn't care. He wants to be re-elected. Are politics different in Africa? Already the Zimbabwean government admits that the farm occupations will cause Zimbabwe to import 100,000 tons of maize. Now, if they admit that number, one can assume that it is much higher because it is reasonable to expect that they would try to downplay the shame. It wasn't long before experts in Zimbabwe and elsewhere contradicted the 100,000 tons of maize needed and estimated it to be more than eight times that number. It is relatively easy to point to the arch-criminal in this drama; it is less obvious to point to the henchmen that support him. It is relatively easy to point to the victims in this drama; it is less obvious to point to the real sufferers. African leaders are notorious for intercepting aid and money for aid from the West and stuff their foreign bank accounts while their own people are dying by the thousands. They build palaces while babies die of malnutrition and their mothers look like living sacks of bones, no longer able to suckle their dying young, no longer able to muster a tear, no longer able to get angry: they themselves being at the brink of the grave. But drive in their capitols, and see the president pass in his motorcade: bulletproof limousines with hundreds of escorting policemen; millions of dollars spent on private jets, body guards, overseas trips, caviar and champagne. Not a thought to the parents, who at every laugh, every bite of caviar, every sip of champagne, has to bury a child who would have lived had only a fraction of the aid siphoned through, had there only been a little less debauchery and gluttony, had there only been but a mere thought for their wellbeing. Who then, are the real perpetrators? Are those who stand idly by not to blame? How much more are those to blame who participate by kissing up to these genocidalists instead of rebuking them? Remember, evil is not only that evil that is perpetrated but it is also the good that is omitted. Send this to your Congressman and Senator. They should be informed. Nico van Niekerk ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 30, 2001
From: Randy Benson <nosneb(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: You met my sister on a flight from London
My sister talked to you on a flight from London. She sent your e-mail address but I probably lost it in a computer reconfiguration. I have attached my resume in the hope that you may have a fit for me. Thanks for your consideration. Randy Benson ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 30, 2001
From: Bruce Campbell <baruch(at)intelligentflight.com>
Subject: Eqip list, MEL for 520
-----Original Message----- From: Bruce Campbell <baruch(at)intelligentflight.com> To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Date: Thursday, August 30, 2001 10:30 AM Subject: Eqip list, MEL for 520 Does anyone have an equipment list for a 520 or 560 that I could use to re-create to one for my plane. It is one of the few pieces of the puzzle left, and the original is a little terse for the FAA's taste.... The alternative is to try to research a "bunch of stuff" that could take a lot of time, etc. Thanks. Bruce A. Campbell AC52 N4186B ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 30, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Re: Eqip list, MEL for 520
>Pardon me but, what is an "Eqip list"? >Do I need one? >bilbo It is the total list of everything installed in the airplane. It should have a line item entry for EVERY accessory as well as it's moment and weight. (better lists also include part numbers and serial numbers). It is a required piece of documentation for an airworthy aircraft. It's also what is used to update your W&B whenever anything is changed. For example, you decide to swap out your generators for new zillion-amp alternators. You simply add the new alternators to the equip list, zero the weight of the generators, and use their arm for the alternators. Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR
In a message dated 08/29/01 18:26:22 Pacific Daylight Time, YOURTCFG(at)aol.com writes: > The choices seem to be Eagle Creek Aviation, > Indianapolis, IN, Northeast air, Portland Maine, Corporate Flight, Smyrna, > TN > or Banyan Air, FT. Lauderdale. Other suggestions???? > You know, there are tons of Commanders in Fladah (note the correct pronunciation; I was instructed by a native) and there's never been any kind of event there. I like the idea of Portland, Maine, but there is less of a concentration of Commanders up there -- and I think the Fladah venue will enable more of our Latin American and Caribbean amigos to attend. Just as important, Sir Barry has never been to Fladah. Bottom line is whether Banyan would provide facilities for us. Considering the number of piston Commanders they see, I'd think it's a good fit. Careful about summer time, though. It would be really hot and muggy in the hangar. Do iguanas and palmetto bugs get along? Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: YAY!
Thanks for all the responses everyone. Looks like we're back on solid ground and the chatlist is functioning normally. See, I can't leave town for even a weekend before you guys tear something up! Well, I plan to go do a pre-purchase inspection on a MRRPM 680FP sometime very soon. If it's as represented, I intend to purchase! The ride to HIO in Milt's 685 just re-confirmed for me that I want a pressurized bird with turbos! I never really had much interest in a turbocharged bird until I bought my Viking, but after four years of being able to rapidly climb as high as I want and cruise at lower RPMs I'm completely sold on the idea. I was talking to Dick MacCoon at the flyin and he really wants me to bring this 680FP out to his shop to have the intercoolers added. He told me that the engines were being robbed of 100hp each at 24000 just due to heating and that I'd REALLY notice a difference with the upgrade. I'm still skeptical, but Dick claims that I'd be able to get 300mph at 24k.... (at 100% continuous on the IO-720s). Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: RNCP
Hey Gang, Really sorry I missed out but maybe next year.Glad every one had such a good time and all arrived home safely.My biggest kick was hearing the Southern(By the grace of God)Rednecks were well represented,from the largest(can't mention any names but his initials are MILT)to the smallest.Have chatted with Russell in the past and have but one thing to say,How in Hell does he expect to become a RNCP eating SOOCHY? Best to you all. Big AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Re: Eqip list, MEL for 520
> Bruce Campbell wrote: > Does anyone have an equipment list for a 520 or 560 that I could use > to re-create to one for my plane. It is one of the few pieces of the > puzzle left, and the original is a little terse for the FAA's > taste.... The alternative is to try to research a "bunch of stuff" > that could take a lot of time, etc. Bruce, There was a great article in this months AOPA mag on equip lists. The bottom line is that you need to start with the manufacturers basic equip list, then update it to match your airplane. AOPA suggested (for old airplanes) that you just create a new list using your favorite spreadsheet and starting with the data from the orig one that came with the airplane. Once you have the equip list up to date, this would be a good time to re-weigh the airplane and create a new W&B sheet as well. Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: w.bow <w.bow(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Eqip list, MEL for 520
Pardon me but, what is an "Eqip list"? Do I need one? bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: Bruce Campbell To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 1:30 PM Subject: Eqip list, MEL for 520 Does anyone have an equipment list for a 520 or 560 that I could use to re-create to one for my plane. It is one of the few pieces of the puzzle left, and the original is a little terse for the FAA's taste.... The alternative is to try to research a "bunch of stuff" that could take a lot of time, etc. Thanks. Bruce A. Campbell AC52 N4186B ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Eqip list, MEL for 520
In a message dated 08/30/01 10:18:55 Pacific Daylight Time, baruch(at)intelligentflight.com writes: > Does anyone have an equipment list for a 520 or 560 that I could use to > re-create to one for my plane. It is one of the few pieces of the puzzle > left, and the original is a little terse for the FAA's taste.... The > alternative is to try to research a "bunch of stuff" that could take a lot > Bruce, There is NO alternative to a "bunch of stuff" when dealing with MELs. They ARE an bunch of work but that's the nature of the beast. Hey .... some guys do Grand Renegade restoration projects and some guys do MELs. The MMEL for the 500 series Commanders is found at the following FAA web link: http://www.opspecs.com/AFSDATA/MMELs/Final/smallac/G500r4a/G500r4a.txt if the hyper link doesn't work, paste this into your browser: http://www.opspecs.com/AFSDATA/MMELs/Final/smallac/G500r4a/G500r4a.txt If you were looking for a list of originally installed equipment on your airplane, you'll have to request that direclty from TCAC, unless you have very detailed weight and balance data for the 520 (he says tongue in cheek). Best of luck ... and write to us when you get released from the asylum. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: Bruce Campbell <baruch(at)intelligentflight.com>
Subject: Re: Equipment list, MEL for 520
That is equipment list, yes on any twin you need one, and preferrably two one equipment list which lists the installed equipment on the plane (generators, hydraulic pump, instruments, heater, etc), and a mimum equipment list which specifies what *must* be working in order to be airworthy. In the absence of an MEL, *all* of the installed equipment must be functioning for airworthiness, so you can get violated for a faulty copilot rate of climb gauge. The list is usually long and detailed (for the nearby 680FL is runs seven pages), and includes weights and moments for each piece of equipment. Since most of this stuff is hard to find (quick, how much does your janitrol weigh and what is it's *exact* CG?) it would be *really* helpful if someone has one already which I can adapt to my plane, rather than have to generate it all by other means (disassembly and weighting???) Bruce A Campbell AC52 N4186B -----Original Message----- From: w.bow <w.bow(at)att.net> To: Bruce Campbell ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Date: Thursday, August 30, 2001 12:08 PM Subject: Re: Eqip list, MEL for 520 Pardon me but, what is an "Eqip list"? Do I need one? bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: Bruce Campbell To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 1:30 PM Subject: Eqip list, MEL for 520 Does anyone have an equipment list for a 520 or 560 that I could use to re-create to one for my plane. It is one of the few pieces of the puzzle left, and the original is a little terse for the FAA's taste.... The alternative is to try to research a "bunch of stuff" that could take a lot of time, etc. Thanks. Bruce A. Campbell AC52 N4186B ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: JETPAUL(at)aol.com <JETPAUL(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: FLYIN TRIP REPORT UP!
Chris, Randy Great Work On The Photos On The Web!!!!! I really wish that Crunk Senior and I could have come. We were able to get junior out there though!!!! (Thanks a million Milt!!,,I hope he was as much help as I promised!!) Paul Reason ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: Milt <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Next year
Next year I'm comin barefoot in bib overalls and a tobacco stained t-shirt. AND I'm bringin BIG AL. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>. MARK & JACK, Ive converted some of the 685 performance charts to XL spreadsheets and downloaded them to a palmpilot so all you have to do is enter Gross weight , temp, and pressure altitude and it will calculat takeoff, landing and start stop distances. Also have converted some power and time to climb charts. Would you like copies? Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: Honey I'm Home!!
Barry and Jimbob you did just great... The very least I expected of my weekend at Hillsboro was to witness a four-engine Commander take-off. Guys your stream take-off was very professional and sounded like four geared lycomings at take-off db, in the same space... Just awesome. For Tylor and I it was well worth the loneliness of gate-keeping... But be put on notice... Next year a tape-recorder must be available! That's for sure! It was the last thing I was expecting to *do* during the weekend! :) What's more impressive than the take off, for sure, is the fact that you wonderful Aussies gladly made such a grueling effort to attend. I have made a fair share of section takeoffs in my young (350TT) flying career, but that is one I shall never forget! I still get giddy over it. BTW, for those of you unfamiliar with formation flying...lead gets all the credit, but the wingmen do all the work. In short, Jim made us look good. Elsewhere I have another 10 hrs. in 680E since HIO. That's about 40TT and I'm now getting to the point where I'm just getting in and enjoying this remarkable aircraft. Ted Smith, you are my hero. Well, one of 'em anyway... Barry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: w.bow <w.bow(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Eqip list, MEL for 520
Thanks. bilbo ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: Mark Woodley <woodlema(at)intrex.net>
Subject: Re: Eqip list, MEL for 520
Here is a document from the www.faa.gov site. Under search MEL. I hope this helps explain the use and requirement for a Minimum Equipment List. I also did not notice any diferentiation between Twin, Single or Turbine Aircraft. I am pretty sure the MEL applies to all aircraft. COMPANY NAME I-1/R-1/02-01-96 GENERAL OPERATIONS MANUAL USE OF MINIMUM EQUIPMENT LIST [135.23(i)] 1. General A. Federal Aviation Regulations require certain systems and equipment to be operative for multiengined aircraft operations. These FAR's also provide for deviations from these requirements via the Minimum Equipment List (MEL). The policy and procedures in this section will be adhered to by MY COMPANY. B. All components/systems on an aircraft fall into three categories in regard to airworthiness requirements. 1) Units obviously required for the aircraft to be airworthy (such as tires, primary control systems, wings, and units required for original certification) are generally not included in the MEL. 2) Units that do not affect the airworthiness of the aircraft (including such items as entertainment systems, cabin trim, curtains, pillows, additional systems for weather detection, flight phones, etc.) are generally not included in the MEL. 3) Units which do not clearly fall into either of the above categories or for which some deviation from the normal complement of equipment has been approved. C. The MEL contains units and systems in category 3 above for which operation of the aircraft with some deviation from airworthiness standards or operating rules has been approved. These are components and systems that the operator or manufacturer has proven that the aircraft may safely operate without, under specific conditions. D. The MEL does not include every piece of equipment or system in the aircraft. When no specific mention of a unit or system is made in the MEL, it is necessary that the equipment be in place and operative unless it falls into category 2 above. It is the Pilot-in-Command's (PIC) responsibility to determine if an item falls into category 2 above. When the item falls into category 2, the PIC must also determine that the inoperative item does not affect the airworthiness of the aircraft. E. Should any doubt exist as to interpretation of MEL items, or the proper category of an item, assistance shall be obtained from the Director of Maintenance, or the Director of Operations. COMPANY NAME I-2/R-1/02-01-96 GENERAL OPERATIONS MANUAL F. The PIC of an aircraft is directly responsible for, and is the final authority as to, the operation of that aircraft. It is the Pica's responsibility to assure that the inoperative equipment is allowed for in the MEL. However, this authority does not allow the PIC to operate an aircraft with an inoperative item requiring maintenance that has not been approved for return to service. G. MEL authorized inoperative items such as radio black boxes, control heads, etc. may be temporarily removed for repair with a logbook entry. Any necessary weight and balance entries must also be made. H. Before a qualified crewmember operates the aircraft with an inoperative item he shall: 1) Determine that the inoperative item is an MEL authorized inoperative item. 2) Determine that the inoperative item will not affect safety of flight. 3) Determine that any required alternate equipment is operative. 4) Review the aircraft maintenance record to assure that the proper write ups and sign offs have been accomplished. 5) Notify the Director of Maintenance at the earliest opportunity of any inoperative item. This notification will allow him to program and initiate procedures to assure timely corrective action is accomplished. 2. Approving Aircraft for Return to Service with Inoperative Items Requiring Maintenance A. Aircraft may be approved for Return to Service as allowed by the MEL if the Director of Maintenance and the PIC agree that operation in the conditions prevailing at the time does not compromise safe operation of the aircraft, and the Director of Maintenance has confirmed that required maintenance action is taken to assure compliance with MEL procedures and prevention of secondary hazards. If an item is marked with an (M), the maintenance procedure must be followed. Items marked with an (M) are the only procedures that require approval for Return to Service. B. The MEL is designed to provide coverage for individual failure in nonrelated systems. In the event of multiple discrepancies, even though each in itself may be permitted, coordination, communication and agreement shall be accomplished by the PIC and the Director of Maintenance. Consideration of the interrelationship of the discrepancies and good judgment must be exercised by personnel authorized to approve the aircraft for Return to Service. COMPANY NAME I-3/R-1/02-01-96 GENERAL OPERATIONS MANUAL C. When the indicating portion of an aircraft system or component is malfunctioning, it may be necessary to perform appropriate troubleshooting procedures to determine that the fault exists in the indicating system and not in the aircraft system or component, in order to properly apply the requirements of this section. D. Prior to any maintenance being accomplished by any non-company personnel or organization the Director of Maintenance will determine whether that personnel or organization is suitable and qualified. E. Before an aircraft is approved for Return to Service the procedures will be accomplished as follows: 1) Before an aircraft is approved for Return to Service under an (M) provision of the MEL an authorized person will: a. Determine whether or not maintenance action is required in addition to that mandated in the MEL, and ensure prevention of secondary hazards. b. Comply with the appropriate procedures in the MEL for the inoperative item. c. Whenever complying with the recording requirements, the procedures outlined in Part 3 of this section will be adhered to. 2) Before an aircraft is approved for Return to Service under an (M) provision of the MEL from an airport where company maintenance personnel are not based and/or are not on duty and after authorizing a suitable and qualified maintenance person to accomplish the maintenance procedures the PIC will: a. Ascertain that the authorized maintenance person is familiar with and understands the provisions and procedures of the approved MEL and this manual. b. Ascertain that the aircraft maintenance record is completed as outlined in Part 3 of this section by the authorized maintenance person. COMPANY NAME I-4/R-1/02-01-96 GENERAL OPERATIONS MANUAL 3. Proper Write Ups and Sign Offs in the Aircraft Maintenance Record A. The portion of the aircraft maintenance record containing the discrepancy records must be on board the aircraft during operation so the PIC may be aware of any inoperative instruments or equipment and be able to write up airworthiness discrepancies as they are discovered. B. Each person who discovers a discrepancy that affects the airworthiness of the aircraft shall write it up in the aircraft discrepancy record as follows: 1) Description of the discrepancy. 2) Signature of person discovering discrepancy. C. Each authorized person who maintains, performs preventative maintenance, rebuilds or alters an aircraft, aircraft engine, propeller, appliance, or component part to comply with a provision of the MEL shall make an entry in the aircraft discrepancy record containing the following information: 1) A description of work performed, which shall include the statement "Aircraft operations continued per MEL ATA # - Item #". (Example: "Aircraft operations continued per MEL Item 23-1"). 2) The date of completion of work performed. 3) The signature, certificate number, and kind of certificate held by the person approving the work. The signature constitutes the approval for Return to Service only for the work performed. D. Each authorized person who approves an aircraft to continue operations with an MEL authorized in operative item that does not have an (M) procedure shall make an entry into the aircraft discrepancy record containing the following information: 1) The statement "Aircraft operations continued per MEL ATA # - Item #". (Example: "Aircraft operations continued per MEL Item 23-1"). 2) Date action taken. 3) The signature, certificate number, and kind of certificate held by the person approving the aircraft to continue operations. COMPANY NAME I-5/R-1/02-01-96 GENERAL OPERATIONS MANUAL E. The following persons are authorized to approve an aircraft to continue operations with inoperative items in accordance with the MEL: 1) The Pilot in Command. 2) The mechanic assigned to perform maintenance on the aircraft who has been delegated authority to approve an aircraft for Return to Service. 3) The Director of Maintenance. 4. Corrective Action to MEL Inoperative Items A. The Director of Maintenance shall review the status of each item that has been approved to continue operations under the terms of the MEL, and shall schedule repair as required by the repair interval designator (A, B, or C) as specified in the MEL. Except as provided in B below, repairs MUST be accomplished as specified by the repair interval designator. B. The Director of Maintenance is authorized to approve an extension to the repair interval provided he accomplishes the following actions: 1) In the case that required parts are not immediately available: a. He shall obtain a firm delivery date of the part from the supplier. b. He shall have the supplier note the delivery date on the order invoice. c. He shall attach a copy of the invoice to the aircraft discrepancy record page containing the entry in question. d. Upon receipt of the subject part the Director of Operations shall be notified and repair scheduled. 2) In the case of other factors beyond the control of the Company: a. A statement containing all pertinent information shall be prepared and affixed to the record of the inoperative item. b. He shall coordinate with the Director of Operations to schedule repair on the expected repair date. COMPANY NAME I-6/R-1/02-01-96 GENERAL OPERATIONS MANUAL Note: "Schedule Repair" means making adequate arrangements for bringing the aircraft, parts, and maintenance personnel together at a given time and place. For repairs to be performed at Company facilities, the Director of Maintenance shall coordinate with the Director of Operations and arrange to take the aircraft out of service to effect the repair. In case of the necessity to use the services of an outside maintenance facility, this also involves making a firm schedule with the facility to effect the repairs. 3) He shall notify the FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector of each time extension he authorizes within 2 working days of such extensions. C. After repairs have been made, the person approving the aircraft for Return to Service shall enter the date, time, description of corrective action, and his signature in the "corrective action" column of the page of the aircraft discrepancy record containing the original discrepancy entry. He shall also ensure that an appropriate entry is made in the permanent aircraft maintenance record as required by FAR. 5. (M) Maintenance and (O) Operational Procedures A. These procedures as specified in the MEL for certain items will be complied with before approving an aircraft for continued operations with an MEL authorized inoperative item. ----- Original Message ----- From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 4:23 PM Subject: Re: Fw: Eqip list, MEL for 520 In a message dated 08/30/01 10:18:55 Pacific Daylight Time, baruch(at)intelligentflight.com writes: Does anyone have an equipment list for a 520 or 560 that I could use to re-create to one for my plane. It is one of the few pieces of the puzzle left, and the original is a little terse for the FAA's taste.... The alternative is to try to research a "bunch of stuff" that could take a lot of time, etc. Bruce, There is NO alternative to a "bunch of stuff" when dealing with MELs. They ARE an bunch of work but that's the nature of the beast. Hey .... some guys do Grand Renegade restoration projects and some guys do MELs. The MMEL for the 500 series Commanders is found at the following FAA web link: http://www.opspecs.com/AFSDATA/MMELs/Final/smallac/G500r4a/G500r4a.txt if the hyper link doesn't work, paste this into your browser: http://www.opspecs.com/AFSDATA/MMELs/Final/smallac/G500r4a/G500r4a.txt If you were looking for a list of originally installed equipment on your airplane, you'll have to request that direclty from TCAC, unless you have very detailed weight and balance data for the 520 (he says tongue in cheek). Best of luck ... and write to us when you get released from the asylum. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: w.bow <w.bow(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: RNCP
re:Soochy I believe in the south we call that BAIT. bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Allen Reed" <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com> To: Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 1:16 PM Subject: RNCP > Hey Gang, Really sorry I missed out but maybe next year.Glad every one had > such a good time and all arrived home safely.My biggest kick was hearing the > Southern(By the grace of God)Rednecks were well represented,from the > largest(can't mention any names but his initials are MILT)to the > smallest.Have chatted with Russell in the past and have but one thing to > say,How in Hell does he expect to become a RNCP eating SOOCHY? Best to you > all. Big AL > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: RNCP
In a message dated 08/31/01 07:30:29 Pacific Daylight Time, allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com writes: > Have chatted with Russell in the past and have but one thing to > say,How in Hell does he expect to become a RNCP eating SOOCHY Think of it as crawdads. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: Bruce Campbell <baruch(at)intelligentflight.com>
Subject: Re: Eqip list, MEL for 520
The list available from the manufacturer is only 12 items on the side of the original W/B. It includes some seats, but not the generators, hyd pump, janitrol, etc., let alone instruments, etc These items are in turn needed for making up a MEL, which it looks like I wont be able to get. In order to get an accurate weight and moment I would have to remove these items, weigh them, find their individual CG, and put back. At this point in the project that would be extremely difficult and perhaps trash the whole project. I cant believe that no one has better info around than that. Thanks Anyway Bruce Campbell AC52 N4186B -----Original Message----- From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com> To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Date: Friday, August 31, 2001 7:23 AM Subject: Re: Eqip list, MEL for 520 >> Bruce Campbell wrote: >> Does anyone have an equipment list for a 520 or 560 that I could use >> to re-create to one for my plane. It is one of the few pieces of the >> puzzle left, and the original is a little terse for the FAA's >> taste.... The alternative is to try to research a "bunch of stuff" >> that could take a lot of time, etc. > >Bruce, >There was a great article in this months AOPA mag on equip lists. >The bottom line is that you need to start with the manufacturers >basic equip list, then update it to match your airplane. AOPA >suggested (for old airplanes) that you just create a new list using >your favorite spreadsheet and starting with the data from the >orig one that came with the airplane. Once you have the equip >list up to date, this would be a good time to re-weigh the airplane >and create a new W&B sheet as well. > >Chris > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR
Careful about summer time, though. It would be really hot and muggy in the hangar. Having been to Flori-duh (new pronunciation instituted after the election) twice this year I would recommend the event be somewhere's around Sun 'n Fun. 1) More bang for the buck. 2) WX is not as much of an issue. Do iguanas and palmetto bugs get along? Don't know about that, but I'm wondering if they can ward off the similar sized roaches... Wing Commander Gordon Just little ol' Barry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR
In a message dated 08/31/01 09:43:16 Pacific Daylight Time, bdogltd(at)pacbell.net writes: > Do iguanas and palmetto bugs get along? > > Don't know about that, but I'm wondering if they can ward off the similar > sized roaches... > After meeting Capt. JimBob's iguana, I'd say it would be a fair match, if we're counting tail lenght. Good point about piggy-backing onto Sun n' Fun. That way we don't have to test anyone's loyalty if they have to shoot their wad on only one trip to Flori-duh per year. My only fear is that we have to put this to a vote ... you know how elections go there ... Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR
My only fear is that we have to put this to a vote ... you know how elections go there ... We'd spend more time designing the ballot than planning a coast-to-coast low level trip... Then the FAA would have to count the ballots... B ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Eqip list, MEL for 520
In a message dated 08/31/01 11:42:26 Pacific Daylight Time, baruch(at)intelligentflight.com writes: > I cant believe that no one has better info around than that. Bruce, I can appreciate your frustration. If you were dealing with an AC-500B, as an example, you would have more support. For that matter, any Commander that's been on an FAR 135 certificate has most of the data you're looking for. With a 520, you're dealing with a truly classic airplane from an era where nothing of this sort was considered an operational necessity. What was your motivation for obtaining an MEL in the first place? If you're going to place your AC-520 onto an air carrier certificate, you need to follow through. If you're looking for compliance with FAR 91.213, read secion "d" which allows small, non-turbine aircraft to operate without an MEL providing the gizmos are not required for flight. You must disable and placard the item "inop" to be legal. ... excerpt from FAR 91.213: (d) Except for operations conducted in accordance with paragraph (a) or (c) of this section, a person may takeoff an aircraft in operations conducted under this part with inoperative instruments and equipment without an approved Minimum Equipment List provided-- (1) The flight operation is conducted in a-- (i) Rotorcraft, nonturbine-powered airplane, glider, or lighter-than-air aircraft for which a master Minimum Equipment List has not been developed; or (ii) Small rotorcraft, nonturbine-powered small airplane, glider, or lighter-than-air aircraft for which a Master Minimum Equipment List has been developed; and (2) The inoperative instruments and equipment are not-- (i) Part of the VFR-day type certification instruments and equipment prescribed in the applicable airworthiness regulations under which the aircraft was type certificated; (ii) Indicated as required on the aircraft's equipment list, or on the Kinds of Operations Equipment List for the kind of flight operation being conducted; (iii) Required by Sec. 91.205 or any other rule of this part for the specific kind of flight operation being conducted; or (iv) Required to be operational by an airworthiness directive; and (3) The inoperative instruments and equipment are-- (i) Removed from the aircraft, the cockpit control placarded, and the maintenance recorded in accordance with Sec. 43.9 of this chapter; or (ii) Deactivated and placarded "Inoperative." If deactivation of the inoperative instrument or equipment involves maintenance, it must be accomplished and recorded in accordance with part 43 of this chapter; and (4) A determination is made by a pilot, who is certificated and appropriately rated under part 61 of this chapter, or by a person, who is certificated and appropriately rated to perform maintenance on the aircraft, that the inoperative instrument or equipment does not constitute a hazard to the aircraft. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: RNCP
If the rumble of pair of 340 geared engines does more for your labido than a six pack of Viagra,you might be a RED NECKED COMMANDER PILOT! AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: Earthlink <woodlema(at)intrex.net>
Subject: Re: Eqip list, MEL for 520
I am glad you spoke those words first. I was going to mention basically the same thing, and add that the proverbial POH was a laughable joke as compared to the POH of today. infact there was no real POH, the POH is was basically a Sales manual with some technical drawings in it. Remember back in 1955 and round about, there were no real regulations as compared with today. Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 3:31 PM Subject: Re: Eqip list, MEL for 520 In a message dated 08/31/01 11:42:26 Pacific Daylight Time, baruch(at)intelligentflight.com writes: I cant believe that no one has better info around than that. Bruce, I can appreciate your frustration. If you were dealing with an AC-500B, as an example, you would have more support. For that matter, any Commander that's been on an FAR 135 certificate has most of the data you're looking for. With a 520, you're dealing with a truly classic airplane from an era where nothing of this sort was considered an operational necessity. What was your motivation for obtaining an MEL in the first place? If you're going to place your AC-520 onto an air carrier certificate, you need to follow through. If you're looking for compliance with FAR 91.213, read secion "d" which allows small, non-turbine aircraft to operate without an MEL providing the gizmos are not required for flight. You must disable and placard the item "inop" to be legal. ... excerpt from FAR 91.213: (d) Except for operations conducted in accordance with paragraph (a) or (c) of this section, a person may takeoff an aircraft in operations conducted under this part with inoperative instruments and equipment without an approved Minimum Equipment List provided-- (1) The flight operation is conducted in a-- (i) Rotorcraft, nonturbine-powered airplane, glider, or lighter-than-air aircraft for which a master Minimum Equipment List has not been developed; or (ii) Small rotorcraft, nonturbine-powered small airplane, glider, or lighter-than-air aircraft for which a Master Minimum Equipment List has been developed; and (2) The inoperative instruments and equipment are not-- (i) Part of the VFR-day type certification instruments and equipment prescribed in the applicable airworthiness regulations under which the aircraft was type certificated; (ii) Indicated as required on the aircraft's equipment list, or on the Kinds of Operations Equipment List for the kind of flight operation being conducted; (iii) Required by Sec. 91.205 or any other rule of this part for the specific kind of flight operation being conducted; or (iv) Required to be operational by an airworthiness directive; and (3) The inoperative instruments and equipment are-- (i) Removed from the aircraft, the cockpit control placarded, and the maintenance recorded in accordance with Sec. 43.9 of this chapter; or (ii) Deactivated and placarded "Inoperative." If deactivation of the inoperative instrument or equipment involves maintenance, it must be accomplished and recorded in accordance with part 43 of this chapter; and (4) A determination is made by a pilot, who is certificated and appropriately rated under part 61 of this chapter, or by a person, who is certificated and appropriately rated to perform maintenance on the aircraft, that the inoperative instrument or equipment does not constitute a hazard to the aircraft. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: OUCH! OUCH!
My father just sent me this. Apparently someone tried to hand-prop a Saratoga....and succeeded... I've NEVER seen such a thing! http://aerocommander.com/Tmp/propped_02.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: John Vormbaum <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: OUCH! OUCH!
"Mr. A&P, I get this funny whistling noise when I fly.....can you check it out?" ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Schuermann" <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com> To: Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 4:31 PM Subject: OUCH! OUCH! > My father just sent me this. Apparently someone tried to hand-prop > a Saratoga....and succeeded... I've NEVER seen such a thing! > > http://aerocommander.com/Tmp/propped_02.jpg > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: Russell Legg <rlegg(at)austarnet.com.au>
Subject: Re: RNCP
If you travel way across the Pacific Ocean tracking the migration of tender flesh that started its life as a 5 metre crocodile from the Arafura Sea and has since been worked into the middle of California rolls only to be consumed by jetsetters at PDX and by Nicole Kidman in hiding in SYD... Then you sure as hell display the worrying symptoms of a RNCP madly searching for some of the sushi action...determined to find viagra with teeth (Nicole's that is !). Remember...Sir Barry was my witness!! Moral of the tale: A true RNCP will routinely consume sushi first... way before that warm beer!! PS BigAl... Did Milt email you that he loved meeting Nicole at HIO?? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: Next year
Absolutely, Milt. If you want a contribution to the costs, it would be a pleasure. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: Milt To: Commander Chat Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 5:44 PM Subject: Next year Next year I'm comin barefoot in bib overalls and a tobacco stained t-shirt. AND I'm bringin BIG AL. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>. MARK & JACK, Ive converted some of the 685 performance charts to XL spreadsheets and downloaded them to a palmpilot so all you have to do is enter Gross weight , temp, and pressure altitude and it will calculat takeoff, landing and start stop distances. Also have converted some power and time to climb charts. Would you like copies? Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: Eqip list, MEL for 520
Just a thought, guys and I may be completely off track here, but wouldn't a company who is in the business of stripping AC's down and rebuilding them be able to help? Thanks Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: Bruce Campbell <baruch(at)intelligentflight.com> To: ; Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:10 AM Subject: Re: Eqip list, MEL for 520 > The list available from the manufacturer is only 12 items on the side of the > original W/B. > It includes some seats, but not the generators, hyd pump, janitrol, etc., > let alone instruments, > etc These items are in turn needed for making up a MEL, which it looks like > I wont be able to get. In order to get an accurate weight and moment I > would have to remove these items, weigh them, find their individual CG, and > put back. At this point in the project that would be extremely difficult > and perhaps trash the whole project. > > I cant believe that no one has better info around than that. > > Thanks Anyway > > Bruce Campbell > AC52 N4186B > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com> > To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com > > Date: Friday, August 31, 2001 7:23 AM > Subject: Re: Eqip list, MEL for 520 > > > >> Bruce Campbell wrote: > >> Does anyone have an equipment list for a 520 or 560 that I could use > >> to re-create to one for my plane. It is one of the few pieces of the > >> puzzle left, and the original is a little terse for the FAA's > >> taste.... The alternative is to try to research a "bunch of stuff" > >> that could take a lot of time, etc. > > > >Bruce, > >There was a great article in this months AOPA mag on equip lists. > >The bottom line is that you need to start with the manufacturers > >basic equip list, then update it to match your airplane. AOPA > >suggested (for old airplanes) that you just create a new list using > >your favorite spreadsheet and starting with the data from the > >orig one that came with the airplane. Once you have the equip > >list up to date, this would be a good time to re-weigh the airplane > >and create a new W&B sheet as well. > > > >Chris > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Eqip list, MEL for 520
In a message dated 8/31/2001 6:00:48 PM Pacific Daylight Time, nico(at)cybersuperstore.com writes: > > Just a thought, guys and I may be completely off track here, but wouldn't a > company who is in the business of stripping AC's down and rebuilding them be > able to help? > Thanks > Sadly no, not if it has geared piston engines jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Eqip list, MEL for 520
In a message dated 8/31/2001 2:48:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time, woodlema(at)intrex.net writes: > Remember back in 1955 and round about, there were no real regulations as > Also remember that you didn't even need a multi engine rateing until about 1962???? It was a better time!!!JB ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Eqip list, MEL for 520
In a message dated 8/31/2001 6:00:48 PM Pacific Daylight Time, nico(at)cybersuperstore.com writes: > > Just a thought, guys and I may be completely off track here, but wouldn't a > company who is in the business of stripping AC's down and rebuilding them be > able to help? > Thanks > Sadly no, not if it has geared piston engines jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2001
From: Russell Legg <rlegg(at)austarnet.com.au>
Subject: Re: RNCP
Greetings all, Thought it might be useful to acknowledge all those Commanders present last weekend... As listed below... Sorry Jimbob for missing your serial number, and Sir Barry please apply your expert eye to the list. Add or amend if you can... The 690?s are airframes which were tucked away in the Aero Air #1 hangar. Have fun guys and dolls Cheers Russell Commanders present at the Aero Air Facility, HIO across the weekend 24 to 26 August: Type Reg s/n 500 N7846C 724 500A N887BD 1249 -74 (Colemill conversion) 500B N353CC 1230 -105 500B N6367U 1424 -150 500B N6273X 1174 - 90 500B N23KM 1436 - 153 500S N9U 1784 - 2 500S N42ZZ 3323 (second last Shrike built) 500U N67SS 1727 - 30 680E N222JS 680E N680E 859 - 78 685 N685JL 685 N414C 12021 690? N9KG 690? N47TT 690? N66GW 690? N325MM 690? N690CH 690? N823SB 690A N310V 690A N290PF 11290 690A N3WU 11336 690B N690LH 11487 690D N611 15018 695A N85NM 96078 (ex VH-LTN) Operated by Aero Air ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 01, 2001
From: w.bow <w.bow(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR
re:Our beautiful weather There is very little difference between April(Sun-N-Fun) and July down here. I think the Sun-N-Fun is a good idea though. If the weather wins out as the determining factor, October thru March would be my choice. The very Southern, bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com To: bdogltd(at)pacbell.net Cc: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 12:58 PM Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR In a message dated 08/31/01 09:43:16 Pacific Daylight Time, bdogltd(at)pacbell.net writes: Do iguanas and palmetto bugs get along? Don't know about that, but I'm wondering if they can ward off the similar sized roaches... After meeting Capt. JimBob's iguana, I'd say it would be a fair match, if we're counting tail lenght. Good point about piggy-backing onto Sun n' Fun. That way we don't have to test anyone's loyalty if they have to shoot their wad on only one trip to Flori-duh per year. My only fear is that we have to put this to a vote ... you know how elections go there ... Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 01, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR
In a message dated 9/1/2001 5:32:57 AM Pacific Daylight Time, w.bow(at)att.net writes: > October thru March would be my choice. HI KIDS............... Thanks for all the great input. I will talk with both Banyon in FL and Eagle Creek in IN, the two everybody seems to like best. Assuming we choose FL, I think Oct would be better than SNF. I have lots of good friends in the kit industry and would love to visit SNF as a "spectator" instead of an exhibitor, but........... It can be difficult to find lodging during the show and everything costs more, kinda like the Reno air races. Also, tying our event to a destination airshow can make it tough to get enough time off to really enjoy either one. Ad to that I like "sir" Barry's idea of having our event the same weekend each year. Late summer or early fall will help guarantee the weather will cooperate as the evnt moves around the country. It would make it a lot easier to plan and remember. Just my thoughts, lets keep talking. Thanks jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 01, 2001
From: CapnSpray(at)aol.com <CapnSpray(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Eqip list, MEL for 520
I don't want to belabor three years, but It brought back memories because I was required to have a Multi-eng rating in 1959 - also Inst. Rating same year. Thanks capnspray ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 01, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Multi Ratings
In a message dated 9/1/01 10:23:49 AM Pacific Daylight Time, CapnSpray(at)aol.com writes: > I don't want to belabor three years, but It brought back memories because I > was required to have a Multi-eng rating in 1959 - also Inst. Rating same > year. Yeah ... but probably only because you were operating 4 engines! ;-) Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 01, 2001
From: Milt Concannon <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Next year
----- Original Message ----- From: Milt Concannon To: Patrick Gisler Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 1:16 PM Subject: Re: Next year Pat, Will send it in a few days. Im working on an instruction sheet on how to use it and a set of guidelines on how to convert your particular graphs to a spread sheet formula. It will also be posted for download from Chris,s web site. You should be able to just change some variables in my formulas for the turbines as I think the 685 and turboprop manuals were built using similiar test flight techniques and graphs. Milt ----- Original Message ----- From: Patrick Gisler To: Milt Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 7:25 PM Subject: Re: Next year Milt Would you consider sharing your spreadsheet design so that us kerosene burners can build some tools for turbine commanders? The Iceman ----- Original Message ----- From: Milt To: Commander Chat Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 5:44 PM Subject: Next year Next year I'm comin barefoot in bib overalls and a tobacco stained t-shirt. AND I'm bringin BIG AL. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>. MARK & JACK, Ive converted some of the 685 performance charts to XL spreadsheets and downloaded them to a palmpilot so all you have to do is enter Gross weight , temp, and pressure altitude and it will calculat takeoff, landing and start stop distances. Also have converted some power and time to climb charts. Would you like copies? Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 01, 2001
From: Bruce Campbell <baruch(at)intelligentflight.com>
Subject: Re: Eqip list, MEL for 520
Actually, the POH is only 9 typewritten pages. A list of Vspeeds (some), a startup checklist, and the text of the four placards that are supposed to be in the plane. I'm personally not too concerned about the whole thing, but the IA is trying to provide the FAA person involved as little to "let pass" as possible. Hence, I'm tasked with at least *trying* to document the plane in a "modern" fashion. By way of explanation, the plane's (very complete) records were destroyed by the previous mechanic, who has been indicted by DOT for, I believe, 41 counts of all kinds of stuff. All of the docs have to be reconstructed, and approved by the local FSDO rep. The factory (especially Geoffery Pence) has been *extremely* helpful (including many a dive into the boxes of REALLY OLD DOCUMENTS in the "obsolete" pile), which I appreciate very much. I also appreciate the feed back I've gotten here, esp from WingCo Gordon. The fact is that much of this stuff doesn't exist, a lot does, and a lot can be "inferred" from later record, for example from the 560, which is quite similar in many ways. What we (myself and my IA) are trying to do is make sure we can say with certainty that we have produced everything in the last two catagories, and that the rest certainly falls in the first and cant reasonably be asked for. I'm assured that this process is nearly over, and that the plane will actually fly sometime next week with brand new logbooks, AD records, etc. Then I too, can document some wonderful flights instead of the finer points of aairworthiness paperwork! Thanks Again Bruce A. Campbell AC52 N4186B I am glad you spoke those words first. I was going to mention basically the same thing, and add that the proverbial POH was a laughable joke as compared to the POH of today. infact there was no real POH, the POH is was basically a Sales manual with some technical drawings in it. Remember back in 1955 and round about, there were no real regulations as compared with today. Mark Actually, it's only ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 01, 2001
From: Milt Concannon <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Spreadsheets
Here is the first installment, more to come. Let me know if you have any questions. Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 01, 2001
From: Milt Concannon <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: DOWNLOADABLE RADAR IMAGES
I keep hearing about the ability to download realtime weather radar images to the GNS430 and 530 series. Is there a website or any other source of information about this? Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 01, 2001
From: JETPAUL(at)aol.com <JETPAUL(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR
I agree JB, Let SNF be it's own show. We have enough to do in Commander land!! Paul Reason ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 01, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Re: 685 performance spreadsheets
> Milt Concannon wrote: > > Chris, > Could you please post these to your download section. Ive been getting > a lot of requests from turbine guys. > > Do you know Jacks last name and email? He had the other 685 at HIO. > > > Still recovering, > Milt All, Milt has provided a nice spreadsheet which calculates takeoff/landing distances (and more) for the 685 Commander. I've added it to the "Documents" section of the web site. You can get there directly at: http://www.aerocommander.com/Documents/index.html Thanks Milt! I'm just about recovered, so I'm going to drive 26 hours to Chattanooga and back :-) If all goes as planned and the airplane looks great, I'll haul one of the engines back to Tulsa with me for a major overhaul. (I'm pretty sure I can't wedge an IO-720 into the back seat of the Viking!) Chris PS: I'll get "Miss Sept" online as soon as I get back. I need a submition for Oct though!!!! Anyone?!?!?!? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 01, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Re: DOWNLOADABLE RADAR IMAGES
> Milt Concannon wrote: > > I keep hearing about the ability to download realtime weather radar > images to the GNS430 and 530 series. Is there a website or any other > source of information about this? > > Milt Ah yes....THAT.... One of the reasons I purchased a GNS530 was to get weather info in my Viking (which obviously can't ever have radar and stormscopes done't work well in). The scoop is that three companies are involved (plus the FAA). The players are: Garmin - must produce certified satelite receiver and software upgrade Orbcom - LEOS sat service provider Echoflight - provides the actual "service" and weather data Garmin keeps missing the deadline on the receiver unit and keeps pushing the price up. They're now saying they'll have it available by the end of the year. Orbcom went bankrupt and has now re-orged and is back in business. Echoflight is most interested in selling their PDA-based system and isn't quite sure what Garmin is doing. It'll probably actually happen before too long. Looks like a nice solution to a number of issues as well. I'm a bit peeved at the three years of "press releases" promising something that still isn't available though... You can read more at http://www.garmin.com http://www.echoflight.com Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 01, 2001
From: Intrex <woodlema(at)intrex.net>
Subject: Re: DOWNLOADABLE RADAR IMAGES
Having installed a GNS 430 in my AC560, the best option in my opinion, if you can afford it is to use an existing stormscope that piped the data directly to the GNS430/530. This provides real time weather data. mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Schuermann" <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com> To: "Commander Chat" Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 10:02 PM Subject: Re: DOWNLOADABLE RADAR IMAGES > > Milt Concannon wrote: > > > > I keep hearing about the ability to download realtime weather radar > > images to the GNS430 and 530 series. Is there a website or any other > > source of information about this? > > > > Milt > > > Ah yes....THAT.... > One of the reasons I purchased a GNS530 was to get weather info in > my Viking (which obviously can't ever have radar and stormscopes > done't work well in). The scoop is that three companies are involved > (plus the FAA). The players are: > > Garmin - must produce certified satelite receiver and software upgrade > > Orbcom - LEOS sat service provider > > Echoflight - provides the actual "service" and weather data > > Garmin keeps missing the deadline on the receiver unit and keeps > pushing the price up. They're now saying they'll have it available > by the end of the year. Orbcom went bankrupt and has now re-orged > and is back in business. Echoflight is most interested in selling > their PDA-based system and isn't quite sure what Garmin is doing. > > It'll probably actually happen before too long. Looks like a nice > solution to a number of issues as well. I'm a bit peeved at the > three years of "press releases" promising something that still isn't > available though... > > You can read more at > http://www.garmin.com > http://www.echoflight.com > > > Chris > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 01, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: DOWNLOADABLE RADAR IMAGES
Who can tell me what a Commander 600 S-2D is (it's serial number is 600-1904D) Thanks Nico ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 01, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: AC 582?
Also, what is a Commander 582 serial number 1882? Nico ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 01, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR
The suggestion I made was indeed to let SNF be it's own show. I suggested that we consider piggybacking on either the tail or front end - thus allowing people to get more "bang for the buck." That's the impetus here, not to compete or participate in SNF. Besides, I don't see "EXPERIMENTAL" pasted on the side of many AC's. :) Although 680E may have just that in about 6 months.... Barry Hancock Precision Flight Networks (949) 300-5510 bdogltd(at)pacbell.net > > I agree JB, Let SNF be it's own show. We have enough to do in Commander > land!! > > > Paul Reason ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 02, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Re: 685 performance spreadsheets
Nico van Niekerk wrote: > > What is the deadline for Miss Sept? > Nico already have sept, but need an oct entry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 02, 2001
From: Jim Crunkleton <crunk12(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR
JB and Paul, I have to agree with you both. Let's have our own thing without the hassle of fighting for accommodations. We can always plan to have a contingent of Commanders at SNF if enough are interested. As to the site, a vote among the members WOULD put the most Commanders at the same place at the same time. The amount of cooperation JB can elicit from the hosting facility might prove to be the deciding factor for the site, as JB will have to be doing all of this planning from long range. ( A formidable task indeed! ) Let's see........the cost of a Commander, $55 to 300+K.... the cost of fuel to attend the Commander Fly-In, $600 to 4000K.......the chance of having the Fly-In coincide with my Family Reunion where I might be able to pick up wimmen, PRICELESS! Crunk ----- Original Message ----- From: <JETPAUL(at)aol.com> To: ; ; ; Cc: Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 9:16 PM Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR > I agree JB, Let SNF be it's own show. We have enough to do in Commander > land!! > > > Paul Reason > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 02, 2001
From: Intrex <woodlema(at)intrex.net>
Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR
Where is SNF..I cannot find that airport Identifier anyplace. Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barry Hancock" <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net> To: ; ; ; Cc: Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 2:36 AM Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR > The suggestion I made was indeed to let SNF be it's own show. I suggested > that we consider piggybacking on either the tail or front end - thus > allowing people to get more "bang for the buck." That's the impetus here, > not to compete or participate in SNF. Besides, I don't see "EXPERIMENTAL" > pasted on the side of many AC's. :) Although 680E may have just that in > about 6 months.... > > Barry Hancock > Precision Flight Networks > (949) 300-5510 > bdogltd(at)pacbell.net > > > > > > I agree JB, Let SNF be it's own show. We have enough to do in Commander > > land!! > > > > > > Paul Reason > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 02, 2001
From: Andrew Foss <afoss(at)caw.com>
Subject: Re: DOWNLOADABLE RADAR IMAGES
I just saw an add from aircell that talked about this. The MFD's like the GNS 430 are setup now, but getting a network connection via satellite or ground base station is the thing to look for. I'd watch aircell and other communications providers for information on this progress. A friend who works for cisco has a computer like what Jeppesen sells, he combined it w/ a cisco wireless IP router that made a satelite connection and had real-time Internet, weather radar. It wasn't cheap, but it worked well. andrew Milt Concannon wrote: I keep hearing about the ability to download realtime weather radar images to the GNS430 and 530 series. Is there a website or any other source of information about this? Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 02, 2001
From: Milt Concannon <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Lycoming engines
Attached is a description of various lycomings and their characteristics. Dont know if this would be useful to the group or not. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 02, 2001
From: Milt Concannon <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Lycoming engines
It would have helped to attach the list. ----- Original Message ----- From: Milt Concannon To: Chris Schuerman Cc: Commander Chat Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 9:55 AM Subject: Lycoming engines Attached is a description of various lycomings and their characteristics. Dont know if this would be useful to the group or not. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 02, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: DOWNLOADABLE RADAR IMAGES
In a message dated 9/1/2001 10:59:14 PM Pacific Daylight Time, nico(at)cybersuperstore.com writes: > Who can tell me what a Commander 600 S-2D is (it's serial number is > 600-1904D) > Thanks HI NICO............... I can tell you exactly what that is I have owned one and have about 5000 hrs in them, and the S2R. It is a Thrush Commander spray plane. The "600" is the horsepower (R-1340 Prat) The "D" was the last model built before Rockwell took over and had no flaps, Good airplanes. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 02, 2001
From: Jim Crunkleton <crunk12(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR
Mark, It's "Sun-n-Fun" held at LAK ( Lakeland, FL) Crunk ----- Original Message ----- From: Intrex <woodlema(at)intrex.net> To: Cc: Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 10:14 AM Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR > Where is SNF..I cannot find that airport Identifier anyplace. > > > Mark > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Barry Hancock" <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net> > To: ; ; ; > > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 2:36 AM > Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR > > > > The suggestion I made was indeed to let SNF be it's own show. I suggested > > that we consider piggybacking on either the tail or front end - thus > > allowing people to get more "bang for the buck." That's the impetus > here, > > not to compete or participate in SNF. Besides, I don't see "EXPERIMENTAL" > > pasted on the side of many AC's. :) Although 680E may have just that in > > about 6 months.... > > > > Barry Hancock > > Precision Flight Networks > > (949) 300-5510 > > bdogltd(at)pacbell.net > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree JB, Let SNF be it's own show. We have enough to do in > Commander > > > land!! > > > > > > > > > Paul Reason > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 02, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR
In a message dated 9/2/2001 7:26:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time, woodlema(at)intrex.net writes: > > HI MARK......... SNF is short for Sun & Fun. The East coast EAA flyin. It is held at Lakeland fL in early April.. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 02, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: DOWNLOADABLE RADAR IMAGES
In a message dated 9/1/2001 10:59:14 PM Pacific Daylight Time, nico(at)cybersuperstore.com writes: > Who can tell me what a Commander 600 S-2D is (it's serial number is > 600-1904D) > Thanks HI NICO............... I can tell you exactly what that is I have owned one and have about 5000 hrs in them, and the S2R. It is a Thrush Commander spray plane. The "600" is the horsepower (R-1340 Prat) The "D" was the last model built before Rockwell took over and had no flaps, Good airplanes. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 02, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR
In a message dated 09/02/01 06:39:59 Pacific Daylight Time, crunk12(at)bellsouth.net writes: > .......the chance of having the > Fly-In coincide with my Family Reunion where I might be able to pick up > wimmen, PRICELESS! > Let's see if I've got the hang of this. "If you fly your Commander to a family reunion to pick up wimmen, you might be a RNCP." How'd I do? If any of you good ol' boys know of another facility other than Banyan ya'll give us a shout. Banyan is the logical place, but we'd darn shore oughta have an alternate if they can't (or won't) host. Having the event in a hangar has proved to be an excellent and economical way to go. Back in the old days we used swank hotels but it cost big bucks to rent the meeting rooms and usually got hit with mandatory catering contract$. Any ideas to help with JimBob's remote-control planning? Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 02, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR
In a message dated 09/02/01 07:26:31 Pacific Daylight Time, woodlema(at)intrex.net writes: > Where is SNF..I cannot find that airport Identifier anyplace. > I was also about to search the airport data base until I realized it was S n' F, and in Sun n' Fun -- the AOPA's show. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 02, 2001
From: Milt Concannon <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: How to convert charts toExcel
Chris, Hope you don't get tired of receiving this stuff but here are the instructions for converting aircraft charts to a usable spreadsheet format. You might consider flying to Chatanooga and paying a kid with a rented van to deliver the engine. I suspect after HIO your business can ill afford your absence. Is Sandy going to do the rebuild? After seeing his work he'll be rebuilding mine when the time comes. Have a safe trip. Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 02, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: DOWNLOADABLE RADAR IMAGES
Thanks,jb. ----- Original Message ----- From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com To: nico(at)cybersuperstore.com ; chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 8:30 AM Subject: Re: DOWNLOADABLE RADAR IMAGES In a message dated 9/1/2001 10:59:14 PM Pacific Daylight Time, nico(at)cybersuperstore.com writes: Who can tell me what a Commander 600 S-2D is (it's serial number is 600-1904D) Thanks HI NICO............... I can tell you exactly what that is I have owned one and have about 5000 hrs in them, and the S2R. It is a Thrush Commander spray plane. The "600" is the horsepower (R-1340 Prat) The "D" was the last model built before Rockwell took over and had no flaps, Good airplanes. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 02, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: images
I've tried to save you guys a lot of money,but no one seems to listen.Get youself a Casio PDA,they now have an attachment to get you on the wireless web,and you can get the Anywhere Map GPS set up,then you will have a backup GPS equall to any panel mount plus you can get on the web with the same PDA and get real time weather and have less than 1500 dollars in the whole outfit!!! BIG AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 02, 2001
From: Mark Woodley <woodlema(at)intrex.net>
Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR
Well, in this life there are WAY too many acronyms. INOP, SNF, ROFLMAO, LOL, MCSE, ACE, PMI, PMP, HVAC, the ones not listed, add that to all the airports identifiers, the made up ones, the ones we don't think about, the ones yet to be invented, and now i need to add SNF to my database. The United States postal Service has a 25 page book typed in 10 point fonts, listing its acronyms. God only knows how many there really are. Oh well, SNF=LAK. Thanks for anwering my question. Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com To: woodlema(at)intrex.net Cc: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 1:39 PM Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR In a message dated 09/02/01 07:26:31 Pacific Daylight Time, woodlema(at)intrex.net writes: Where is SNF..I cannot find that airport Identifier anyplace. I was also about to search the airport data base until I realized it was S n' F, and in Sun n' Fun -- the AOPA's show. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 02, 2001
From: Milt <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR
Hell I thought SNF meant skilled nursing facility. Thats where I send my Gomers that aint well enough to go home and aint sick enough to stay in the hospital ----- Original Message ----- From: Mark Woodley To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 4:47 PM Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR Well, in this life there are WAY too many acronyms. INOP, SNF, ROFLMAO, LOL, MCSE, ACE, PMI, PMP, HVAC, the ones not listed, add that to all the airports identifiers, the made up ones, the ones we don't think about, the ones yet to be invented, and now i need to add SNF to my database. The United States postal Service has a 25 page book typed in 10 point fonts, listing its acronyms. God only knows how many there really are. Oh well, SNF=LAK. Thanks for anwering my question. Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com To: woodlema(at)intrex.net Cc: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 1:39 PM Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR In a message dated 09/02/01 07:26:31 Pacific Daylight Time, woodlema(at)intrex.net writes: Where is SNF..I cannot find that airport Identifier anyplace. I was also about to search the airport data base until I realized it was S n' F, and in Sun n' Fun -- the AOPA's show. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 02, 2001
From: D Monk <britmonk(at)swbell.net>
Subject: Re: Commander 600 S-2D
Originally Snow S2A single engine monoplane agricultural aircraft powered by P&W R-1340 600 hp engine. Bought by Rockwell Nov '65 and became Thrush Commander 600. Program later sold to Ayers Corp. Derek Monk Nico van Niekerk wrote: > Who can tell me what a Commander 600 S-2D is (it's serial number is > 600-1904D) > Thanks > Nico ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 03, 2001
From: w.bow <w.bow(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR
re:Ft Lauderdale The weather is about the same year round there. The only time it is cool is Dec. 15 to Jan 15. I know, I spent the first 37 years of my life 60 miles south of there. That's before we moved up north(Orlando). bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com To: woodlema(at)intrex.net Cc: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 1:39 PM Subject: Re: NEXT YEAR In a message dated 09/02/01 07:26:31 Pacific Daylight Time, woodlema(at)intrex.net writes: Where is SNF..I cannot find that airport Identifier anyplace. I was also about to search the airport data base until I realized it was S n' F, and in Sun n' Fun -- the AOPA's show. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 03, 2001
From: Milt <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Parts and Pieces
I have the following items available if anybody is interested Shrike nose for a 500 or 680 (will not fit a 520 or short 560) WX 10A stormscope Internal control lock for 500, 520, 560, 680 Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 03, 2001
From: Jim Crunkleton <crunk12(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: RNCP
Wing Commander Gordon, I reckin' yore gittin' the hang of this here southern culture! Where are yore Momma and Diddy from? By the way, if a man and wife move from Alabama to Georgia......are they still man and wife or just brother and sister? Gee, SO much to learn and SO little time! Crunk ( Still trying to figure out how to install the chrome naked lady mudflaps on my 520) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 03, 2001
From: Michrandi(at)aol.com <Michrandi(at)aol.com>
Subject: (no subject)
If you fly your Commander to a family reunion and pick up wimmen, which are your cousins, does that make you a RNCP ? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 03, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: (no subject)
Ya'll git to know what relative humidity is. ----- Original Message ----- From: Michrandi(at)aol.com To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 8:51 PM Subject: (no subject) If you fly your Commander to a family reunion and pick up wimmen, which are your cousins, does that make you a RNCP ? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 03, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re 680FL
Can anyone shed more light on a Commander 680FL airframe serial number 1352? Thanks Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: Jim Crunkleton To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 7:52 PM Subject: RNCP Wing Commander Gordon, I reckin' yore gittin' the hang of this here southern culture! Where are yore Momma and Diddy from? By the way, if a man and wife move from Alabama to Georgia......are they still man and wife or just brother and sister? Gee, SO much to learn and SO little time! Crunk ( Still trying to figure out how to install the chrome naked lady mudflaps on my 520) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 04, 2001
From: Rodd Browne <dc8f(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: sad sighting
Possibly this is a fact already known to our commander historians but there is a 690 (I believe) hull behind the fire house at Daytona Beach airport being used for fire drills. The registration mark is N177DC. Painted out (but still legible) along the lower sides is the name "Embry Riddle Aeronautical Institute". I have a couple of pictures if anyone wants them. rodd ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 04, 2001
From: Milt <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Re: RNCP
If they move to Gawgia they still bes married. If they move to Noo Yawk Theys kin and caint do it no more. If theys move to californy it dont matter cuz everythins ok out there. ----- Original Message ----- From: Jim Crunkleton To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 9:52 PM Subject: RNCP Wing Commander Gordon, I reckin' yore gittin' the hang of this here southern culture! Where are yore Momma and Diddy from? By the way, if a man and wife move from Alabama to Georgia......are they still man and wife or just brother and sister? Gee, SO much to learn and SO little time! Crunk ( Still trying to figure out how to install the chrome naked lady mudflaps on my 520) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 04, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Re 680FL
In a message dated 09/04/01 00:39:18 Pacific Daylight Time, nico(at)cybersuperstore.com writes: > Can anyone shed more light on a Commander 680FL airframe serial number 1352? > Thanks > Nico > Sounds like an assignment for Sir Barry. Do you have a registration number as well? Some of us may know it by that. ~Wing Commander Gordon~ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 04, 2001
From: Barry Collman <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: Hillsboro
The reason for this rather late addition to the accolades already posted is two-fold. Firstly, I travelled from Portland to Oklahoma City where I spent a further week in the US, returning home yesterday. Secondly, I have trawled through the Concise Oxford Dictionary to find the words necessary to describe the event at Hillsboro. I found some which 'would do', but am now certain that in order to express my true feelings, word(s) haven't yet been defined. I could try great, terrific, fabulous, fantastic, sensational and other similar ones, but they just wouldn't win a cigar. Also, inhabitants of Commanderland, I have now rumbled your presence on planet Earth. I do not know from which planet you all come from, nor the Solar System or Galaxy, but you cannot be from our humble planet. We just simply are not capable of breeding beings with such a great attitude to life. All I can say is, you are welcome to stay for as long as you like. You almost had me fooled that you were Earthlings, but nobody born on this planet can possibly have the attributes which you all are obviously blessed with. Three things gave you away. First, is the craft you arrived in, known here by us mortal beings as an Aero Commander. No earthling could have designed and built such a wonderful and beautiful machine. Second, is your leader, who you call Capt. Jimbob. No human being can possibly have been born with such enthusiasm, drive, energy and organisational skills. Humans can possess some of these attributes, but not all. Thirdly, the one you call Milt. Such shirts are not made on planet Earth. But, fear not. I will not be telling US or Australian Immigration - your secret is safe with me. Should it ever be necessary to leave planet Earth and find another to bless with your presence, please, please, please, take me with you. Seriously though, I was totally blown away by the Fly-In. Having met Capt. Jimbob and spent some time with him when we flew down to Scottsdale last March, I knew we had an extraordinary leader of the Group. I can only hope that those who attended Hillsboro can now appreciate the reason for posting my "Ass Chewin" email. It was evident that Jim dearly wanted the Fly-In to be a success, he was so fired up about it all, but the support didn't appear to be there for him. Even people I had met before seemed different to me. The event seemed to bring an even bigger smile to their faces than I'd seen before. Capt. Jimbob and Susan deserve all the plaudits which have been posted through the chatlist, and more. They were, of course, ably assisted by Chad and Jim's mate Jim Reader. They were, of course, ably supported by the terrific group of attendees. How he can possibly top Hillsboro at next year's event I do not know, but one thing is for sure. I'm not missing it! Thanks must, of course, go to everybody who attended and contributed to such a great time. I don't really think it fair to single out names, but must pick a few other than Capt. Jimbob and Susan. Aero Air, of course, for hosting the event and Kevin, Ken and Swede. The guys (and doll!) from Oz, Richard, Jacqui and Russell. I thought my journey was long, but to travel all that way is just extraordinary. Did I really hear Richard say he was bringing his 680E to the 2003 Fly-In? Yes, I did! Also, Milt Concannon for making the journey from Gulfport in his 685. What a great guy!! My mind is still reeling from it all. There are memories there which will never, never ever be lost. I can only say Thank You, each and every one of you for making this trip the most enjoyable one I've ever had the pleasure to make. It was truly awesome. There are so many memories I could write a book about those few days at Hillsboro. Some great rides with Jimbob in 222JS. Dropping into the Flying M grass strip for lunch on the way home to Jim's. I'm sure the restaurant emptied when we left. It seemed they all wanted to watch the departure of Juliet Sierra. I wonder if they've ever had a Commander there before? The joint take-off from Hillsboro, with Barry Hancock's 680E and at least a whole film used to shoot some air-to-air shots. There's more, lots more. How many people can say they've flown with an Iguana? I can!! How many other Groups could possibly have such nice people all together at one event? None! Again, Thank You to everybody. Very Sincere Regards, Barry C. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 04, 2001
From: Barry Collman <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Re 680FL
Hi gang! Well, just about back in the harness again. The downside of the trip is that I'm back at work tomorrow! Serial 1352 was originally N6333U and was Certificated on October 29th, 1963. It was exported to South Africa as ZS-RIL by Downtown Airpark in April, 1970 and to the best of my knowledge, is still there. Was registered to Eigenbau (Pty) Ltd., in Brixton on February 18th 1992. If you need anything more specific Nico, please let me know. Very Best Regards Barry C. ----- Original Message ----- From: Nico van Niekerk To: Jim Crunkleton ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 8:14 AM Subject: Re 680FL Can anyone shed more light on a Commander 680FL airframe serial number 1352? Thanks Nico ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 04, 2001
From: Barry Collman <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Re 680FL
Hi Nico! I've attached an .xls file showing what I had on the history of serial 1352. There was one accident I have traced, which happened at Tucson, Arizona, on May 10th, 1966. According to the NTSB brief report, the left main gear torque link shaft (Part No. ED12406) was missing and the shaft lock bolt was improperly installed. N6333U made a wheels up landing on a foamed runway. Damage was shown as 'Substantial', but as you can see, repairs were effected on June 20th 1966. If you proceed with the purchase, perhaps you will be kind enough to let me know what the "glass installation" modification was, made on June 16th, 1964. Picture windows perhaps? Also, I'd like to know the date the Miller nose was added. Lastly, if you know which Province both Mabopane and Brixton are in, please let me know! I cannot help on the matter of flying it back though. I'm not a pilot myself. However, I'm sure that if you posed the question to Wing Commander Gordon, he'd be able to help. Hope this is of interest, Nico and will look forward to seeing 1352 at next year's Fly-In. This year's was just so good, I cannot wait until the next one. Now Capt. Jimbob's got one under his belt, fine-tuning will make future ones just awesome. So many great people there, it was an honour to be in their presence. Great people, great humour, great food. It couldn't have been better. Very Best Regards, Barry C. ----- Original Message ----- From: Nico van Niekerk To: Barry Collman Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:20 PM Subject: Re: Re 680FL Amazing! You do have all the details!. I am interested in buying the plane to either use it in South Africa when I am down there on business or bring it right back here to its motherland. I favor the latter of course: still being PO'd because I couldn't attend the fly-in. Next year, maybe, with this baby. If you have any details about mishaps, misuse or any other information that would help me evaluating this plane, I would really appreciate it. I am traveling to Johannesburg next week and will spend a bit of time with her. There was an article some time ago (cannot remember who posted it) how to determine that the gearboxes are still OK, something of a 'kick-tire' type test. Also, I am contemplating flying her back to the States (if I decide to buy and bring her back) myself purely because I'd hate to pass up the opportunity to make such a trip. What do you think? Is it a wise thing to do? Sorry for all the questions. I will scan and prepare a storyboard on my straight 500 that I owned in SA for miss October. Thanks Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: Barry Collman To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 8:23 AM Subject: Re: Re 680FL Hi gang! Well, just about back in the harness again. The downside of the trip is that I'm back at work tomorrow! Serial 1352 was originally N6333U and was Certificated on October 29th, 1963. It was exported to South Africa as ZS-RIL by Downtown Airpark in April, 1970 and to the best of my knowledge, is still there. Was registered to Eigenbau (Pty) Ltd., in Brixton on February 18th 1992. If you need anything more specific Nico, please let me know. Very Best Regards Barry C. ----- Original Message ----- From: Nico van Niekerk To: Jim Crunkleton ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 8:14 AM Subject: Re 680FL Can anyone shed more light on a Commander 680FL airframe serial number 1352? Thanks Nico ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 04, 2001
From: Mark Woodley <woodlema(at)intrex.net>
Subject: Panel pics of my AC-560
Delays, Delays, Delays. Exterior still in the almost done stage, but I thought I would send out some pics of my panel. I don;t think it is too bad for a 1955 airplane. The center throttle quadrant will be painted like the panel. I cannot wait till I can get it back and fly it. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 04, 2001
From: Barry Collman <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Re 680FL
That's OK Nico and I'm pleased the history was of interest! I should have known Mabopane was in Botswana and, of course, could have done a search on the web. I have quite a few other such instances where the State/Province of some Countries is awaiting detail, but now I have the Internet at home, I'll engage my brain and get cracking on some of them! If you can get some up-to-date pictures of 'RIL, I'll be really grateful. If you do decide to buy it, I've got one shot of 1352 as N6333U and at least eleven as ZS-RIL. I can scan them and send to you. Very Best Regards, Barry C. ----- Original Message ----- From: Nico van Niekerk To: Barry Collman Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 8:19 PM Subject: Re: Re 680FL Thanks Barry. This guy's gonna wet himself if he sees all of this on his 'plane. Mabopane used to be the capitol of the Republic of Bophuthatswana, one of the old homelands of South Africa. I don't know whether it has survived as a city since the communist ANC take-over in 1994, but in 1988 that would have been about 100 or so miles west of Johannesburg. Brixton is a suburb of Johannesburg and is about 5 miles west of downtown Johannesburg. I already have some pictures of RIL (exterior and interior) but I will take more and let you know when I get back. Perhaps copies of its POH and so on. I'll see what I can do. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: Barry Collman To: Nico van Niekerk Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:25 AM Subject: Re: Re 680FL Hi Nico! I've attached an .xls file showing what I had on the history of serial 1352. There was one accident I have traced, which happened at Tucson, Arizona, on May 10th, 1966. According to the NTSB brief report, the left main gear torque link shaft (Part No. ED12406) was missing and the shaft lock bolt was improperly installed. N6333U made a wheels up landing on a foamed runway. Damage was shown as 'Substantial', but as you can see, repairs were effected on June 20th 1966. If you proceed with the purchase, perhaps you will be kind enough to let me know what the "glass installation" modification was, made on June 16th, 1964. Picture windows perhaps? Also, I'd like to know the date the Miller nose was added. Lastly, if you know which Province both Mabopane and Brixton are in, please let me know! I cannot help on the matter of flying it back though. I'm not a pilot myself. However, I'm sure that if you posed the question to Wing Commander Gordon, he'd be able to help. Hope this is of interest, Nico and will look forward to seeing 1352 at next year's Fly-In. This year's was just so good, I cannot wait until the next one. Now Capt. Jimbob's got one under his belt, fine-tuning will make future ones just awesome. So many great people there, it was an honour to be in their presence. Great people, great humour, great food. It couldn't have been better. Very Best Regards, Barry C. ----- Original Message ----- From: Nico van Niekerk To: Barry Collman Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:20 PM Subject: Re: Re 680FL Amazing! You do have all the details!. I am interested in buying the plane to either use it in South Africa when I am down there on business or bring it right back here to its motherland. I favor the latter of course: still being PO'd because I couldn't attend the fly-in. Next year, maybe, with this baby. If you have any details about mishaps, misuse or any other information that would help me evaluating this plane, I would really appreciate it. I am traveling to Johannesburg next week and will spend a bit of time with her. There was an article some time ago (cannot remember who posted it) how to determine that the gearboxes are still OK, something of a 'kick-tire' type test. Also, I am contemplating flying her back to the States (if I decide to buy and bring her back) myself purely because I'd hate to pass up the opportunity to make such a trip. What do you think? Is it a wise thing to do? Sorry for all the questions. I will scan and prepare a storyboard on my straight 500 that I owned in SA for miss October. Thanks Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: Barry Collman To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 8:23 AM Subject: Re: Re 680FL Hi gang! Well, just about back in the harness again. The downside of the trip is that I'm back at work tomorrow! Serial 1352 was originally N6333U and was Certificated on October 29th, 1963. It was exported to South Africa as ZS-RIL by Downtown Airpark in April, 1970 and to the best of my knowledge, is still there. Was registered to Eigenbau (Pty) Ltd., in Brixton on February 18th 1992. If you need anything more specific Nico, please let me know. Very Best Regards Barry C. ----- Original Message ----- From: Nico van Niekerk To: Jim Crunkleton ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 8:14 AM Subject: Re 680FL Can anyone shed more light on a Commander 680FL airframe serial number 1352? Thanks Nico ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 04, 2001
From: w.bow <w.bow(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Panel pics of my AC-560
very nice bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: Mark Woodley To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 2:30 PM Subject: Panel pics of my AC-560 Delays, Delays, Delays. Exterior still in the almost done stage, but I thought I would send out some pics of my panel. I don;t think it is too bad for a 1955 airplane. The center throttle quadrant will be painted like the panel. I cannot wait till I can get it back and fly it. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 04, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Re: Hillsboro
Barry Collman wrote: > I have trawled through the Concise Oxford Dictionary to find the words > necessary to describe the event at Hillsboro. Supercalifragilisticexpialidotious! cs ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2001
From: Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk <Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk>
Subject: Re: AC 582?
Hi Nico! I haven't seen a response to your request on this one, so thought I'd 'have a stab'. I believe the Commander 582 is a amateur-built rotocraft, powered by a Rotax engine. And, no, I'm not going to include them on my database! Further info can be found at: http://www.airsport.com/kits/k582.htm Best Regards, Barry C. Nico van Niekerk , Chris store.com> Schuermann , Commander Chat 02/09/2001 06:42 cc: Subject: AC 582? Also, what is a Commander 582 serial number 1882? Nico ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2001
From: Russell Legg <rlegg(at)austarnet.com.au>
Subject: Re: Hillsboro
> Barry Collman wrote: >> I have trawled through the Concise Oxford Dictionary to find the words >> necessary to describe the event at Hillsboro. > > Supercalifragilisticexpialidotious! > > cs G'day Chris, Just thought I'd announce you as the most adventurous speller of the week! It's just the Principal coming out in me... Cheers and beers Russell ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2001
From: Russell Legg <rlegg(at)austarnet.com.au>
Subject: Re: RNCP
> Milt, > > This lil Ozzie is finding the interpretations more and more difficult...will > things ever return to normal again...playyyze! > > Russell > (closeted in the dictionary section of an ozzie library...somewhere on the > south side!) > > > If they move to Gawgia they still bes married. If they move to Noo Yawk Theys > kin and caint do it no more. If theys move to californy it dont matter cuz > everythins ok out there. > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Jim Crunkleton <mailto:crunk12(at)bellsouth.net> >> To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com >> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 9:52 PM >> Subject: RNCP >> >> Wing Commander Gordon, >> I reckin' yore gittin' the hang of this here southern culture! Where are yore >> Momma and Diddy from? By the way, if a man and wife move from Alabama to >> Georgia......are they still man and wife or just brother and sister? Gee, SO >> much to learn and SO little time! >> Crunk ( Still trying to figure out how to install the chrome naked lady >> mudflaps on my 520) >> >> ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2001
From: w.bow <w.bow(at)att.net>
Subject: belts
I found this lurking in the back of the AOPA magazine the other day and thought it might be of use to some. http://www.aircraftbelts.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Re: images
Allen Reed wrote: > > I've tried to save you guys a lot of money,but no one seems to listen.Get > youself a Casio PDA,they now have an attachment to get you on the wireless > web Allen, That would be a very nice way to do it if there was some way to get the data to the airplane, I agree. Sadly, there is no such thing as the "wireless web" yet... I know that there are several major companies attempting to provide some reasonable coverage, but at this time it's mostly just a pipe dream. cs ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Pipe Dream
Chris,I know I am probably the dumbest person in the group,but before I am judged so,you need to check the Casio web site,under Cassiopea and read there latest release.Yes It does state that weather can be accessed through their wireless receiver attached to the Casio. Thanks for your support. Allen ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: AC 582?
Thanks, Chief. I agree, this one does not belong on your database. Any Commander that you can buy for $995 new does not belong here. :-) Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: <Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk> To: Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 2:29 AM Subject: Re: AC 582? > > Hi Nico! > > I haven't seen a response to your request on this one, so thought I'd 'have > a stab'. > > I believe the Commander 582 is a amateur-built rotocraft, powered by a > Rotax engine. And, no, I'm not going to include them on my database! > > Further info can be found at: > > http://www.airsport.com/kits/k582.htm > > Best Regards, > > Barry C. > > > Nico van Niekerk > , Chris > store.com> Schuermann , > Commander Chat > 02/09/2001 06:42 > cc: > Subject: AC 582? > > > Also, what is a Commander 582 serial number 1882? > Nico > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2001
From: Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk <Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk>
Subject: Re: AC 582?
No problem Nico, but the kit does actually cost $10,471. The $995 is additional to that, for a two-place option. Big deal!! They cannot spell propeller correctly though!! Very Best Regards, Barry Nico van Niekerk Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk cc: 05/09/2001 15:31 Subject: Re: AC 582? Thanks, Chief. I agree, this one does not belong on your database. Any Commander that you can buy for $995 new does not belong here. :-) Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: <Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk> To: Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 2:29 AM Subject: Re: AC 582? > > Hi Nico! > > I haven't seen a response to your request on this one, so thought I'd 'have > a stab'. > > I believe the Commander 582 is a amateur-built rotocraft, powered by a > Rotax engine. And, no, I'm not going to include them on my database! > > Further info can be found at: > > http://www.airsport.com/kits/k582.htm > > Best Regards, > > Barry C. > > > Nico van Niekerk > , Chris > store.com> Schuermann , > Commander Chat > 02/09/2001 06:42 > cc: > Subject: AC 582? > > > Also, what is a Commander 582 serial number 1882? > Nico > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: VB resume
----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Taylor" <douglast(at)thorit.com> To: Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 8:34 AM Subject: VB resume > Hello Nico > Here is 1 more for you to review > Thank you > > DOUGLAS TAYLOR > SERVICE MANAGER > THOR > 818-710-1800 > douglast(at)thorit.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Re: Pipe Dream
Allen Reed wrote: > > Chris,I know I am probably the dumbest person in the group Not at all Allen! I'm actually very familiar with the Casio offering. It was my company that designed the "wireless backpack" for Casio! The only problem is that all of the folks who are spouting great press releases about "wireless access" are not providing the whole picture... The issue is that in the US, wireless access is only available in a very few areas and with very limited range. If you have wireless access (for example) in Houston Tx, it will ONLY work in Houston. You'd need to subscribe to a different service in any other city. Unlike the cell phone network which "hands off" between service provides, the internet data networks have no such ability. Echoflight uses the Orbcom Sat network to transmit data and it will work anywhere. It's substantially more expensive of course and they still don't have a certified tranceiver available for aircraft use yet, but at least their handheld device IS up and running. The data you get through echoflight is horribly compressed however to cut the sat airtime costs. It's nowhere near the quality you'd get over your normal internet connection. (actually, you COULD get that quality, but it would cost several hundred dollars to pull up a web page). There are a number of companies which are trying to build out a nation-wide terrestial wireless network, but at this time there is only spotty coverage. I think we WILL have this technology in the future, but I'm not going to guess when you'll actually be able to get quality weather info in pseudo-realtime to your airplane.... Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: images
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tylor Hall" <tylorh(at)sound.net> To: ; Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 7:51 AM Subject: RE: images > I just ran across Echo Flight. > http://www.echoflight.com/index.html > They have the Data Link Transceiver and GPS that can be installed in your > aircraft and feed your lap top or their handheld or fixed MFD. > You also need to subscribe to the service. > Includes real time weather, terrain, traffic, GPS moving map and charts. > > A friend with a Palm VII that had wireless web was able to get e-mail in his > Aerostar and in airliners. > > No, Big Al you are not dumb! You are uninhibited and open to many new > ideas. > > Any body going to NBAA in New Orleans later this month?? > > Regards, > > Tylor Hall > tylorh(at)sound.net > 913-422-8869 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Schuermann [mailto:chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 9:00 AM > To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com > Subject: Re: images > > > Allen Reed wrote: > > > > I've tried to save you guys a lot of money,but no one seems to listen.Get > > youself a Casio PDA,they now have an attachment to get you on the wireless > > web > > Allen, > That would be a very nice way to do it if there was some way to > get the data to the airplane, I agree. Sadly, there is no such > thing as the "wireless web" yet... I know that there are several > major companies attempting to provide some reasonable coverage, but > at this time it's mostly just a pipe dream. > > cs > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: AC 582?
In a message dated 9/5/01 7:53:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time, nico(at)cybersuperstore.com writes: > . Any > Commander that you can buy for $995 new does not belong here. :-) > Careful now, That is about what I paid for triple 2 (and it was tooooo much!!) jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: THERE EVERYWHERE
HI KIDS............. Just got home from a busy week with the biplane. Took a little flight to Harvey field north of SEA for lunch with some friends from Idaho. Pokeing around the hangars found a Commander (The hangar looked to small from the outside). N2774B was carefully parked inside. Looks like a 560A?? It is completely stock (no winglets, noses even still has Goodyears) Not a gorgeous example but nice and clean. It was to dark to take a picture through the window (sorry Barry). Hope all is well in Commanderland. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2001
From: Jim Martyn <vertigo(at)whidbey.net>
Subject: Looking for Demo Flight in Seattle Area
I'm new to this list and wondering if any of you folks in the Seattle area might be willing to take me for a short demo flight in your Twin Commander if I pay for fuel. I may be selling my Twin Bonanza soon and I'm very interested in acquiring a Commander next, but I haven't flown in any yet to know if this is the right aircraft for me. Thanks for the bandwidth, Jim Martyn Oak Harbor, WA (76S) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2001
From: Intrex <woodlema(at)intrex.net>
Subject: Re: Looking for Demo Flight in Seattle Area
Big difference. Twin commander has some performance you cannot get in any other aircraft. ----- Original Message ----- From: Jim Martyn To: AeroCommander List Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:00 AM Subject: Looking for Demo Flight in Seattle Area I'm new to this list and wondering if any of you folks in the Seattle area might be willing to take me for a short demo flight in your Twin Commander if I pay for fuel. I may be selling my Twin Bonanza soon and I'm very interested in acquiring a Commander next, but I haven't flown in any yet to know if this is the right aircraft for me. Thanks for the bandwidth, Jim Martyn Oak Harbor, WA (76S) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2001
From: Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk <Barry.Collman(at)airclaims.co.uk>
Subject: Re: THERE EVERYWHERE
Hi All! N2774B is, as our leader surmised, a Model 560A. Serial 274 was Certificated on December 6th 1955 and was modified to a Model HC560A, with GO-480-G1B6 engines, on September 22nd, 1967. Currently appears to be owned by Frank G Welch, of Woodinville, WA. Great to know that another old Commander is still alive and well. Thanks for the "Roving Report" Jim. Very Best Regards, Barry C. UK Commanderland Rep. YOURTCFG@aol. com To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com cc: 05/09/2001 Subject: THERE EVERYWHERE 16:59 HI KIDS............. Just got home from a busy week with the biplane. Took a little flight to Harvey field north of SEA for lunch with some friends from Idaho. Pokeing around the hangars found a Commander (The hangar looked to small from the outside). N2774B was carefully parked inside. Looks like a 560A?? It is completely stock (no winglets, noses even still has Goodyears) Not a gorgeous example but nice and clean. It was to dark to take a picture through the window (sorry Barry). Hope all is well in Commanderland. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Re: Looking for Demo Flight in Seattle Area
> Jim Martyn wrote: > I may be selling my Twin Bonanza soon and I'm very interested in > acquiring a Commander next, but I haven't flown in any yet to know if > this is the right aircraft for me. Howdy Jim. I consider T-bone owners to be "kindred spirits" :-) Your hearing (what's left of it) is already attuned to the sound of a pair of geared Lycs with augmentor tubes so you would be right at home in an older Commander. Just curious - what is your motivation for changing to a Commander? Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Self-fly or ferry
Folks, I need to pick someone's brain here for a moment. I am interested in buying a 680FL in South Africa and I may keep it in SA for use when I am down there, or bring it back to the States (for next year's fly-in?) Now, here's my question: what is best, fly it back myself or have it ferried back? I realize that there are a host of things and red-tape that has to be taken care of when one self-drives an aircraft halfway accros the globe but it would be a rare adventure too, which is what I don't want to pass up if it can be helped. If anybody has experience with flying over several countries (not behind some pro jocks) and especially between South Africa and the US, some feedback and advice would be really helpful. My greatest concern is flying over or landing in politically unstable countries in Africa. Do we go north along the east coast, the center, or the west coast of Africa. Once we are in Europe we should be safe from that problem, I think. Should I have ferry tanks installed to have minimum ground contact over Africa or not. Should I 'N'-number the plane before leaving or fly it to the States with its SA registration and switch here. So many questions... Nico ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2001
From: Frits Abbing <fritsabbing(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry
Hi Nico I tried to sent an e-mail but it didn't work --- Nico van Niekerk wrote: > Folks, I need to pick someone's brain here for a > moment. > I am interested in buying a 680FL in South Africa > and I may keep it in SA for use when I am down > there, or bring it back to the States (for next > year's fly-in?) > Now, here's my question: what is best, fly it back > myself or have it ferried back? > I realize that there are a host of things and > red-tape that has to be taken care of when one > self-drives an aircraft halfway accros the globe but > it would be a rare adventure too, which is what I > don't want to pass up if it can be helped. > If anybody has experience with flying over several > countries (not behind some pro jocks) and especially > between South Africa and the US, some feedback and > advice would be really helpful. My greatest concern > is flying over or landing in politically unstable > countries in Africa. Do we go north along the east > coast, the center, or the west coast of Africa. Once > we are in Europe we should be safe from that > problem, I think. Should I have ferry tanks > installed to have minimum ground contact over Africa > or not. Should I 'N'-number the plane before leaving > or fly it to the States with its SA registration and > switch here. > So many questions... > Nico > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2001
From: Frits Abbing <fritsabbing(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry
Hi Nico I've read your story of buying an Commander in SA. I can help you in bringing it over. My background is a retired airline pilot with the last 10 years on the Boeing 747-400 with a Dutch company(KLM). I've flown well in SA and did also lots of ocean crossings to the US. At this moment I have an FAA PPL ME and some hours experience on the Commander 680. I bought one myself in Florida in august this year. More to come! If I can assist you please do not hesitate in e-mailing me. Regards Frits Abbing --- Nico van Niekerk wrote: > Folks, I need to pick someone's brain here for a > moment. > I am interested in buying a 680FL in South Africa > and I may keep it in SA for use when I am down > there, or bring it back to the States (for next > year's fly-in?) > Now, here's my question: what is best, fly it back > myself or have it ferried back? > I realize that there are a host of things and > red-tape that has to be taken care of when one > self-drives an aircraft halfway accros the globe but > it would be a rare adventure too, which is what I > don't want to pass up if it can be helped. > If anybody has experience with flying over several > countries (not behind some pro jocks) and especially > between South Africa and the US, some feedback and > advice would be really helpful. My greatest concern > is flying over or landing in politically unstable > countries in Africa. Do we go north along the east > coast, the center, or the west coast of Africa. Once > we are in Europe we should be safe from that > problem, I think. Should I have ferry tanks > installed to have minimum ground contact over Africa > or not. Should I 'N'-number the plane before leaving > or fly it to the States with its SA registration and > switch here. > So many questions... > Nico > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2001
From: w.bow <w.bow(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry
This info is 20 years old. When I was in Tanzania you could not fly from South Africa directly to Tanzania. It was politically impossible. I know there are others that are the same way. "You can't get there from here" That might be where an "N" number might be good. However a GB might be better. To me an adventure is civilized departure point to civilized arrival point. The first half of your trip sounds more like a "Mission" A Big OLD Wuss bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: Nico van Niekerk To: AeroCommander List Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:42 AM Subject: Self-fly or ferry Folks, I need to pick someone's brain here for a moment. I am interested in buying a 680FL in South Africa and I may keep it in SA for use when I am down there, or bring it back to the States (for next year's fly-in?) Now, here's my question: what is best, fly it back myself or have it ferried back? I realize that there are a host of things and red-tape that has to be taken care of when one self-drives an aircraft halfway accros the globe but it would be a rare adventure too, which is what I don't want to pass up if it can be helped. If anybody has experience with flying over several countries (not behind some pro jocks) and especially between South Africa and the US, some feedback and advice would be really helpful. My greatest concern is flying over or landing in politically unstable countries in Africa. Do we go north along the east coast, the center, or the west coast of Africa. Once we are in Europe we should be safe from that problem, I think. Should I have ferry tanks installed to have minimum ground contact over Africa or not. Should I 'N'-number the plane before leaving or fly it to the States with its SA registration and switch here. So many questions... Nico ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2001
From: Andrew Foss <afoss(at)caw.com>
Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry
My advice is pay jeppesen or some other international flight planning service, regardless of who pilots! andrew "w.bow" wrote: This info is 20 years old. When I was in Tanzania you could not fly from South Africa directly to Tanzania. It was politically impossible. I know there are others that are the same way. "You can't get there from here" That might be where an "N" number might be good. However a GB might be better. To me an adventure is civilized departure point to civilized arrival point. The first half of your trip sounds more like a "Mission" A Big OLD Wussbilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: Nico van Niekerk To: AeroCommander List Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:42 AM Subject: Self-fly or ferry Folks, I need to pick someone's brain here for a moment.I am interested in buying a 680FL in South Africa and I may keep it in SA for use when I am down there, or bring it back to the States (for next year's fly-in?)Now, here's my question: what is best, fly it back myself or have it ferried back?I realize that there are a host of things and red-tape that has to be taken care of when one self-drives an aircraft halfway accros the globe but it would be a rare adventure too, which is what I don't want to pass up if it can be helped.If anybody has experience with flying over several countries (not behind some pro jocks) and especially between South Africa and the US, some feedback and advice would be really helpful. My greatest concern is flying over or landing in politically unstable countries in Africa. Do we go north along the east coast, the center, or the west coast of Africa. Once we are in Europe we should be safe from that problem, I think. Should I have ferry tanks installed to have minimum ground contact over Africa or not. Should I 'N'-number the plane before leaving or fly it to the States with its SA registration and switch here.So many questions...Nico ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry
Things have changed a lot from 20 years ago and one cannot help but wonder if 'N' numbered planes are more at a disadvantage than 'ZS' (South African) planes especially when flying over Arab countries. With a ferry tank the 680FL could have a 2000 nm range, which could take it from Durban FADN (sea level take off) to the south of France with perhaps one or two fuel stops. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: w.bow To: Nico van Niekerk ; AeroCommander List Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:38 AM Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry This info is 20 years old. When I was in Tanzania you could not fly from South Africa directly to Tanzania. It was politically impossible. I know there are others that are the same way. "You can't get there from here" That might be where an "N" number might be good. However a GB might be better. To me an adventure is civilized departure point to civilized arrival point. The first half of your trip sounds more like a "Mission" A Big OLD Wuss bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: Nico van Niekerk To: AeroCommander List Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:42 AM Subject: Self-fly or ferry Folks, I need to pick someone's brain here for a moment. I am interested in buying a 680FL in South Africa and I may keep it in SA for use when I am down there, or bring it back to the States (for next year's fly-in?) Now, here's my question: what is best, fly it back myself or have it ferried back? I realize that there are a host of things and red-tape that has to be taken care of when one self-drives an aircraft halfway accros the globe but it would be a rare adventure too, which is what I don't want to pass up if it can be helped. If anybody has experience with flying over several countries (not behind some pro jocks) and especially between South Africa and the US, some feedback and advice would be really helpful. My greatest concern is flying over or landing in politically unstable countries in Africa. Do we go north along the east coast, the center, or the west coast of Africa. Once we are in Europe we should be safe from that problem, I think. Should I have ferry tanks installed to have minimum ground contact over Africa or not. Should I 'N'-number the plane before leaving or fly it to the States with its SA registration and switch here. So many questions... Nico ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2001
From: blake hermel <bhermel(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry
Just curious, but, Wouldnt a 2,000 mile trip burn alot of oil??? Blake Hermel >From: Nico van Niekerk >To: "w.bow" , AeroCommander List >Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry >Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:15:41 -0700 > >Things have changed a lot from 20 years ago and one cannot help but wonder if 'N' numbered planes are more at a disadvantage than 'ZS' (South African) planes especially when flying over Arab countries. With a ferry tank the 680FL could have a 2000 nm range, which could take it from Durban FADN (sea level take off) to the south of France with perhaps one or two fuel stops. >Nico > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: w.bow > To: Nico van Niekerk ; AeroCommander List > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:38 AM > Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry > > > This info is 20 years old. When I was in Tanzania you could not fly from South Africa directly to Tanzania. It was politically impossible. I know there are others that are the same way. "You can't get there from here" That might be where an "N" number might be good. However a GB might be better. > > To me an adventure is civilized departure point to civilized arrival point. The first half of your trip sounds more like a "Mission" > > A Big OLD Wuss > bilbo > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Nico van Niekerk > To: AeroCommander List > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:42 AM > Subject: Self-fly or ferry > > > Folks, I need to pick someone's brain here for a moment. > I am interested in buying a 680FL in South Africa and I may keep it in SA for use when I am down there, or bring it back to the States (for next year's fly-in?) > Now, here's my question: what is best, fly it back myself or have it ferried back? > I realize that there are a host of things and red-tape that has to be taken care of when one self-drives an aircraft halfway accros the globe but it would be a rare adventure too, which is what I don't want to pass up if it can be helped. > If anybody has experience with flying over several countries (not behind some pro jocks) and especially between South Africa and the US, some feedback and advice would be really helpful. My greatest concern is flying over or landing in politically unstable countries in Africa. Do we go north along the east coast, the center, or the west coast of Africa. Once we are in Europe we should be safe from that problem, I think. Should I have ferry tanks installed to have minimum ground contact over Africa or not. Should I 'N'-number the plane before leaving or fly it to the States with its SA registration and switch here. > So many questions... > Nico > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Request
All, I received the following request which I think is a great idea. I'll need YOUR help in filling it though. I will start a list immediatly. Please send your submitions directly to me for addition... Chris ----snip-------- Would it be possible to have a list of services and suppliers that have been used by individuals in the group. And maybe a satisfaction rating with it. Some comments like expensive or cheap or fast or slow. Something like the Insurance survey maybe? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2001
From: blake hermel <bhermel(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry
Nico,need a copilot........Blake >From: "Nico van Niekerk" >To: "blake hermel" , , >Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry >Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:22:32 -0700 > >Yes it would. The installation of ferry tanks usually also include the installation of a manual oil replenishing system, pumping oil at a predetermined rate of say, 1 quart of oil every two hours, or so, depending on the need of the engines. >Nico > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: blake hermel > To: nico(at)cybersuperstore.com ; w.bow(at)att.net ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:59 PM > Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry > > > Just curious, but, Wouldnt a 2,000 mile trip burn alot of oil??? > > Blake Hermel > > >From: Nico van Niekerk > >To: "w.bow" , AeroCommander List > >Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry > >Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:15:41 -0700 > > > >Things have changed a lot from 20 years ago and one cannot help but wonder if 'N' numbered planes are more at a disadvantage than 'ZS' (South African) planes especially when flying over Arab countries. With a ferry tank the 680FL could have a 2000 nm range, which could take it from Durban FADN (sea level take off) to the south of France with perhaps one or two fuel stops. > >Nico > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: w.bow > > To: Nico van Niekerk ; AeroCommander List > > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:38 AM > > Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry > > > > > > This info is 20 years old. When I was in Tanzania you could not fly from South Africa directly to Tanzania. It was politically impossible. I know there are others that are the same way. "You can't get there from here" That might be where an "N" number might be good. However a GB might be better. > > > > To me an adventure is civilized departure point to civilized arrival point. The first half of your trip sounds more like a "Mission" > > > > A Big OLD Wuss > > bilbo > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Nico van Niekerk > > To: AeroCommander List > > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:42 AM > > Subject: Self-fly or ferry > > > > > > Folks, I need to pick someone's brain here for a moment. > > I am interested in buying a 680FL in South Africa and I may keep it in SA for use when I am down there, or bring it back to the States (for next year's fly-in?) > > Now, here's my question: what is best, fly it back myself or have it ferried back? > > I realize that there are a host of things and red-tape that has to be taken care of when one self-drives an aircraft halfway accros the globe but it would be a rare adventure too, which is what I don't want to pass up if it can be helped. > > If anybody has experience with flying over several countries (not behind some pro jocks) and especially between South Africa and the US, some feedback and advice would be really helpful. My greatest concern is flying over or landing in politically unstable countries in Africa. Do we go north along the east coast, the center, or the west coast of Africa. Once we are in Europe we should be safe from that problem, I think. Should I have ferry tanks installed to have minimum ground contact over Africa or not. Should I 'N'-number the plane before leaving or fly it to the States with its SA registration and switch here. > > So many questions... > > Nico > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry
Yes it would. The installation of ferry tanks usually also include the installation of a manual oil replenishing system, pumping oil at a predetermined rate of say, 1 quart of oil every two hours, or so, depending on the need of the engines. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: blake hermel To: nico(at)cybersuperstore.com ; w.bow(at)att.net ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:59 PM Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry Just curious, but, Wouldnt a 2,000 mile trip burn alot of oil??? Blake Hermel >From: Nico van Niekerk >To: "w.bow" , AeroCommander List >Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry >Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:15:41 -0700 > >Things have changed a lot from 20 years ago and one cannot help but wonder if 'N' numbered planes are more at a disadvantage than 'ZS' (South African) planes especially when flying over Arab countries. With a ferry tank the 680FL could have a 2000 nm range, which could take it from Durban FADN (sea level take off) to the south of France with perhaps one or two fuel stops. >Nico > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: w.bow > To: Nico van Niekerk ; AeroCommander List > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:38 AM > Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry > > > This info is 20 years old. When I was in Tanzania you could not fly from South Africa directly to Tanzania. It was politically impossible. I know there are others that are the same way. "You can't get there from here" That might be where an "N" number might be good. However a GB might be better. > > To me an adventure is civilized departure point to civilized arrival point. The first half of your trip sounds more like a "Mission" > > A Big OLD Wuss > bilbo > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Nico van Niekerk > To: AeroCommander List > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:42 AM > Subject: Self-fly or ferry > > > Folks, I need to pick someone's brain here for a moment. > I am interested in buying a 680FL in South Africa and I may keep it in SA for use when I am down there, or bring it back to the States (for next year's fly-in?) > Now, here's my question: what is best, fly it back myself or have it ferried back? > I realize that there are a host of things and red-tape that has to be taken care of when one self-drives an aircraft halfway accros the globe but it would be a rare adventure too, which is what I don't want to pass up if it can be helped. > If anybody has experience with flying over several countries (not behind some pro jocks) and especially between South Africa and the US, some feedback and advice would be really helpful. My greatest concern is flying over or landing in politically unstable countries in Africa. Do we go north along the east coast, the center, or the west coast of Africa. Once we are in Europe we should be safe from that problem, I think. Should I have ferry tanks installed to have minimum ground contact over Africa or not. Should I 'N'-number the plane before leaving or fly it to the States with its SA registration and switch here. > So many questions... > Nico > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Request
In a message dated 9/6/01 1:28:50 PM Pacific Daylight Time, chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com writes: > Would it be possible to have a list of services and suppliers that > have > been used by individuals in the group. And maybe a satisfaction rating > with > it. HI KIDS........... I have used the services of almost all of the advertisers in the Flight Group News and found them to be reliable. capt jimbob ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2001
From: Andrew Foss <afoss(at)caw.com>
Subject: Re: Request
Morris Kernick, Commander Services, Hayward, CA! He's quite a character, his shop is a mess, he's hired some poor mechanics, he's terrible w/ paperwork, a few people bad mouth him... He knows more about our airplanes and has more passion for them than anyone. He's fixed more stuff on my airplane than others continually seem to be able to f%$! up. Even he can't always fix things as easily and quickly as he'd like, but he really wants to! I wouldn't want to operate my airplane w/ my friends and family in it without him! andrew PS He's also a great source of humurous quotes... "The problem was located 14" behind and 12" to the left of the power quadrant..." "If you can see the other end of the runway it's not long enough..." "When you push on the levers, you darn well better be pointed in the right direction..." "Even a barn door can fly with enough power..." YOURTCFG(at)aol.com wrote: In a message dated 9/6/01 1:28:50 PM Pacific Daylight Time, chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com writes: Would it be possible to have a list of services and suppliers that have been used by individuals in the group. And maybe a satisfaction rating with it. HI KIDS........... I have used the services of almost all of the advertisers in the Flight Group News and found them to be reliable. capt jimbob ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2001
From: Randy Dettmer <rcdettmer(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Request
Another couple of quotes from Morris... "Too much power... is just about right". "If you don't mind the red levers, you may find yourself piling up a stack of dead presidents". Or, about my 680F... "Just imagine a line of 55 gallon barrels full of fuel sitting along the top of your wing...and just pushing one off every hour of so..." "With a 680F, it'll climb at 140 knots and 1000 fpm with the seats full of anvil salesmen...and their samples". Wouldn't take my airplane to anyone else. Randy Dettmer 680F/N6253X ----- Original Message ----- From: Andrew Foss To: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com Cc: chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 4:38 PM Subject: Re: Request Morris Kernick, Commander Services, Hayward, CA! He's quite a character, his shop is a mess, he's hired some poor mechanics, he's terrible w/ paperwork, a few people bad mouth him... He knows more about our airplanes and has more passion for them than anyone. He's fixed more stuff on my airplane than others continually seem to be able to f%$! up. Even he can't always fix things as easily and quickly as he'd like, but he really wants to! I wouldn't want to operate my airplane w/ my friends and family in it without him! andrew PS He's also a great source of humurous quotes... "The problem was located 14" behind and 12" to the left of the power quadrant..." "If you can see the other end of the runway it's not long enough..." "When you push on the levers, you darn well better be pointed in the right direction..." "Even a barn door can fly with enough power..." YOURTCFG(at)aol.com wrote: In a message dated 9/6/01 1:28:50 PM Pacific Daylight Time, chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com writes: Would it be possible to have a list of services and suppliers that have been used by individuals in the group. And maybe a satisfaction rating with it. HI KIDS........... I have used the services of almost all of the advertisers in the Flight Group News and found them to be reliable. capt jimbob ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2001
From: Patrick Gisler <patrick(at)gislermgmt.com>
Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry
Nico, For a modest fee, uvair provides everything from weather to lunch for such adventures. If it were me, I'd fly it myself. Life is short, and all they can do is steal your airplane and torture you to near death. The Iceman ----- Original Message ----- From: Nico van Niekerk To: blake hermel ; w.bow(at)att.net ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:22 PM Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry Yes it would. The installation of ferry tanks usually also include the installation of a manual oil replenishing system, pumping oil at a predetermined rate of say, 1 quart of oil every two hours, or so, depending on the need of the engines. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: blake hermel To: nico(at)cybersuperstore.com ; w.bow(at)att.net ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:59 PM Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry Just curious, but, Wouldnt a 2,000 mile trip burn alot of oil??? Blake Hermel >From: Nico van Niekerk >To: "w.bow" , AeroCommander List >Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry >Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:15:41 -0700 > >Things have changed a lot from 20 years ago and one cannot help but wonder if 'N' numbered planes are more at a disadvantage than 'ZS' (South African) planes especially when flying over Arab countries. With a ferry tank the 680FL could have a 2000 nm range, which could take it from Durban FADN (sea level take off) to the south of France with perhaps one or two fuel stops. >Nico > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: w.bow > To: Nico van Niekerk ; AeroCommander List > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:38 AM > Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry > > > This info is 20 years old. When I was in Tanzania you could not fly from South Africa directly to Tanzania. It was politically impossible. I know there are others that are the same way. "You can't get there from here" That might be where an "N" number might be good. However a GB might be better. > > To me an adventure is civilized departure point to civilized arrival point. The first half of your trip sounds more like a "Mission" > > A Big OLD Wuss > bilbo > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Nico van Niekerk > To: AeroCommander List > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:42 AM > Subject: Self-fly or ferry > > > Folks, I need to pick someone's brain here for a moment. > I am interested in buying a 680FL in South Africa and I may keep it in SA for use when I am down there, or bring it back to the States (for next year's fly-in?) > Now, here's my question: what is best, fly it back myself or have it ferried back? > I realize that there are a host of things and red-tape that has to be taken care of when one self-drives an aircraft halfway accros the globe but it would be a rare adventure too, which is what I don't want to pass up if it can be helped. > If anybody has experience with flying over several countries (not behind some pro jocks) and especially between South Africa and the US, some feedback and advice would be really helpful. My greatest concern is flying over or landing in politically unstable countries in Africa. Do we go north along the east coast, the center, or the west coast of Africa. Once we are in Europe we should be safe from that problem, I think. Should I have ferry tanks installed to have minimum ground contact over Africa or not. Should I 'N'-number the plane before leaving or fly it to the States with its SA registration and switch here. > So many questions... > Nico > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry
In a message dated 09/06/01 13:12:27 Pacific Daylight Time, bhermel(at)hotmail.com writes: > Just curious, but, Wouldnt a 2,000 mile trip burn alot of oil??? Yes! Take a peek at the article on the Commander web site about my trip to Pago Pago from Oakland, California for some insight on fuel and oil consumption. Nico, In today's climate a GB registration (or Canadian) is probably as good as it gets ... French would be good but probably more trouble than it's worth to obtain. They are French, after all. Call or email Denny Craig. He frequently pulls Raytheon products out of South Africa (BE-1900s, BE-58, etc.) and brings them back to Europe and the U.S. This is his full time business, so don't expect all this trade secrets, but he'll give you his take on the current shoot-down climate, etc. Denny Craig Aviation Services International P.O. Box 2785 Fairfield, CA 94533 office: 707-448-5138*** use this fax: 707-448-7769 Res: 707-425-0430 dcraigfly(at)aol.com If you have the spare time, it will be one of the great adventures (or missions) of your life -- although I think you've had plenty already. (Nice to rev up the adrenal glands now and then, eh?) If you're busy managing your financial empire, employ a pro like Mr. Craig. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Miss Sept online
Miss September 2001 - bilbo's 500A is now showing... In other news, I (aided by "Crunk" who was so kind as to drive several hours to lend a hand AND bring cold beer) did a pre-purchase inspection on N89PK over the weekend. (I would also add that 27 hours of seat time in an old pickup was NOT fun!). She appears to be a fine old bird and I committed to purchase. I brought the r/h engine back with me to be overhauled. 89PK is a 680FP Commander with MRRPM IO-720 engines and rayjay turbos. At this time all looks to be a "go" for purchase as long as we don't find anything unexpected (ie: bad crank or such) during the engine teardown. More later Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry
Great tips, guys. Thanks. Financial empire? Steady now. It might be a case of fiddling while something else is burning type empire, or rather piddling on the fire. I have done a few things that I would like to remember. This would be one of them. Getting pumped up already. Have to resist. Haven't bought the ship yet. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 5:51 PM Subject: Re: Self-fly or ferry In a message dated 09/06/01 13:12:27 Pacific Daylight Time, bhermel(at)hotmail.com writes: Just curious, but, Wouldnt a 2,000 mile trip burn alot of oil??? Yes! Take a peek at the article on the Commander web site about my trip to Pago Pago from Oakland, California for some insight on fuel and oil consumption. Nico, In today's climate a GB registration (or Canadian) is probably as good as it gets ... French would be good but probably more trouble than it's worth to obtain. They are French, after all. Call or email Denny Craig. He frequently pulls Raytheon products out of South Africa (BE-1900s, BE-58, etc.) and brings them back to Europe and the U.S. This is his full time business, so don't expect all this trade secrets, but he'll give you his take on the current shoot-down climate, etc. Denny Craig Aviation Services International P.O. Box 2785 Fairfield, CA 94533 office: 707-448-5138*** use this fax: 707-448-7769 Res: 707-425-0430 dcraigfly(at)aol.com If you have the spare time, it will be one of the great adventures (or missions) of your life -- although I think you've had plenty already. (Nice to rev up the adrenal glands now and then, eh?) If you're busy managing your financial empire, employ a pro like Mr. Craig. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Miss Sept online
WOW!!!!!!!!!!!! GREAT NEWS!!!!!!!!!!! SEND MORE INFO SOON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 Love jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Request
ANOTHER "YODA" QUOTE............ "A TAKEOFF IN A 680E IS LIKE SITTING BETWEEN TWO FUEL DRAGSTERS" jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 07, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Another oldie but goodie
Down at Gillispie Field, San Diego today...pulled up a Whirlwind Propellers (composite aerobatic props) to drop off a prop for my CJ and saw a rough white with blue and gold trim bathtub Commander. Data plate said 560A, Mfgrs. # 264, built Sept 1955. Had GO-480-D1A engines. Apparently bought for $7K and will require $150K to get it flying.... 680E is flying like a dream! Up to 50 hrs. in her now. What a great bird! "Man, that thing is loud" said a friend that recently watched a max. perf. takeoff. Cool. Very cool. Barry Hancock Precision Flight Networks (949) 300-5510 bdogltd(at)pacbell.net From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 00:04:58 -0400 (EDT) To: rcdettmer(at)charter.net, afoss(at)caw.com Cc: chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com, commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Subject: Re: Request ANOTHER "YODA" QUOTE............ "A TAKEOFF IN A 680E IS LIKE SITTING BETWEEN TWO FUEL DRAGSTERS" jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 07, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Dragsters of the sky
ANOTHER "YODA" QUOTE............ "A TAKEOFF IN A 680E IS LIKE SITTING BETWEEN TWO FUEL DRAGSTERS" Yeah! Why is power SOOOOO addicting? I'm lucky in that, by pure chance, the first Commander I own is a 680E. Sure I burn a little more gas, but max. perf. TO's are so FUNNNNNN. So is getting to altitude, whatever altitude you choose, at 1000 fpm. I have a Nanchang CJ-6A Chinese Military trainer. 9 cyl. radial with 285 hp...1500 fpm initial climb rate, 150 kt. cruise on 14 gph. However, the engine started going south a couple months ago so I elected to swap engines....to the M14P 360 HP RADIAL MONSTER, HAAHHAAAHAAAHHAAAHAHHAHAHAAAAAA!!!!!!..........uh, um, sorry. Climb will now be 3000 fpm with cruise and fuel burn about the same. New aircraft paint, about $20K... New Apollo MX-20, about $7K... The feeling you get in your loins when you pour the coals to a (or two) fire breathing engines, PRICELESS! Barry (Tim Allen is my hero) Hancock ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 07, 2001
From: CapnSpray(at)aol.com <CapnSpray(at)aol.com>
Subject: A Real RNCP
[Unable to display image]Cap'n Spray ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 07, 2001
From: David Maytag <dmaytag(at)commspeed.net>
Subject: Re: Dragsters of the sky
----- Original Message ----- From: David Maytag To: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 7:51 PM Subject: RE: Dragsters of the sky Like I always say: "You ain't havin fun if you ain't burnin gas!" So many people just don't realize how simple it is -- but it sounds like all of you get it. I'm new to the group and sorry I missed the fly-in, but it sure is fun reading all the enthusiasm for these great airplanes. I'm also glad to hear someone else in the group has found the joys of the M-14. My other plane (or only plane at the moment since I am between Commanders) is a Helio Courier with a 400hp M-14PF. Without a doubt, the geared Lycoming and the M-14 are the coolest sounding engines out there! Anyone else out there ever think about putting a pair of M-14's on a 680E? I don't think I could bastardize a venerable 680, but it would be fun. Regards, David Maytag ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 07, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: Dragsters of the sky
I tell you, I once saw in Mozambique a BN Islander with a pair of turboprops hung on its wings. That sucker took off and ascended like a home-sick angel. I know it would be sacrilegious to replace good geared pumps with a fan, but man, wouldn't they sail. But then again, buy a Renaissance. Fool. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: David Maytag To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:20 PM Subject: RE: Dragsters of the sky ----- Original Message ----- From: David Maytag To: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 7:51 PM Subject: RE: Dragsters of the sky Like I always say: "You ain't havin fun if you ain't burnin gas!" So many people just don't realize how simple it is -- but it sounds like all of you get it. I'm new to the group and sorry I missed the fly-in, but it sure is fun reading all the enthusiasm for these great airplanes. I'm also glad to hear someone else in the group has found the joys of the M-14. My other plane (or only plane at the moment since I am between Commanders) is a Helio Courier with a 400hp M-14PF. Without a doubt, the geared Lycoming and the M-14 are the coolest sounding engines out there! Anyone else out there ever think about putting a pair of M-14's on a 680E? I don't think I could bastardize a venerable 680, but it would be fun. Regards, David Maytag ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 08, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: Dragsters of the sky
I tell you, I once saw in Mozambique a BN Islander with a pair of turboprops hung on its wings. That sucker took off and ascended like a home-sick angel. I know it would be sacrilegious to replace good geared pumps with a fan, but man, wouldn't they sail. It would be worth considering if you could find a way to keep the props behind the cockpit. Those turbines stick SO FAR out there... But then again, buy a Renaissance. Fool. Not really a fool. You could do the conversion for less than a half a million using Walter turbines.... Barry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 08, 2001
From: Luis Henrique Pennacchi <lhpmail(at)uol.com.br>
Subject: AFM supplement ...
Hi Folks ! Im sorry about my short vocabulary ! I havent fluency in english language ... I would like to known if anyone have the power settings to the Shrike Commander 500-S with manual controlled Rajay turbocharge system (turbonormalizer) STCs "SE 6WE" and "SA 529WE" or if you know where I can find the AFM supplement... Thank You Very Much ! Luis Henrique Pennacchi lhpmail(at)uol.com.br ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 08, 2001
From: Milt Concannon <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: new names
Its nice to see some new names ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 08, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <tylorh(at)sound.net>
Subject: Re: AFM supplement ...
Luis, The AFM will show the Max Cont. 29.5" MP - 2650 RPM power setting is only allowed for 5 Min (due to over heating) then power must be pulled back to 26" MP. This is a very high power setting that will consume a lot of fuel at a high noise level. On the stock Rajay system, overheating was a problem. Excessive heat is a maintenance problem. Dick MacCoons Mr. RPM new system is being designed to reduce the heat by moving the oil cooler behind the firewall and increase the airflow over the turbos and components aft of the engine. There will also be an intercooler to lower the inlet temperature to the engine. Also the removal of the cowl flaps will reduce the drag of a stock system. We are looking at offering the oil cooler and the intercooler as separate modifications if there is enough requests. Most operators will like to operate the engine at 2200 RPM for lower sound levels and at 25 of MP for economy cruse with lean of peek fuel flow settings. The system will come standard with new fuel injectors balanced to the engine. You will be able to use higher setting for increased climb to cruse altitudes in the 10,000 to 12,000 ft levels (or higher if you are on O2). I heard one operator claim a 20-knot increase in speed over standard with just fixing he turbos. The new system may have even better performance. We will know more when we get one flying. Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 -----Original Message----- From: Luis Henrique Pennacchi [mailto:lhpmail(at)uol.com.br] Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 4:24 PM To: Twin Commander Flight Group Subject: AFM supplement ... Hi Folks ! Im sorry about my short vocabulary ! I havent fluency in english language ... I would like to known if anyone have the power settings to the Shrike Commander 500-S with manual controlled Rajay turbocharge system (turbonormalizer) STCs "SE 6WE" and "SA 529WE" or if you know where I can find the AFM supplement... Thank You Very Much ! Luis Henrique Pennacchi lhpmail(at)uol.com.br ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 08, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: new names
In a message dated 9/8/2001 6:23:30 PM Pacific Daylight Time, mdcmd@ms-online.com writes: > Its nice to see some new names > > YEP, it is!! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 09, 2001
From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com>
Subject: Re: AFM supplement ...
Tylor wrote: >The AFM will show the Max Cont. 29.5" MP - 2650 RPM power setting is >only allowed for 5 Min (due to over heating) then power must be pulled back >to 26" MP. My Bellanca also has a Lycoming 540 with rayjays that appears to have the same basic numbers. I like to cruise it at 2200 and 24-26". Like Tylor says, it's considerably quieter and the fuel flows much lower. You may find, however, that your engine is smoother at 2400 - especially if it is a higher time motor that has spent most of it's life at 2400. The counterweight bushings tend to wear and won't dampen as well... >Dick MacCoon's Mr. RPM new system is being designed to reduce the heat by moving the oil cooler behind the firewall and >increase >the airflow over the turbos and components aft of the engine. There will also be an intercooler to lower the inlet >temperature >to the engine. Also the removal of the cowl flaps will reduce the drag of a stock system. >We are looking at offering the oil cooler and the intercooler as separate modifications if there is enough requests. I am very interested in making these upgrades to 89PK, but I'm just not sure if there's enough room to add the intercooler on the 720's. Tylor, I noticed that you used "we" in your letter. Are you working with Dick on this project? Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 09, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Copy of Agreement and directions for tomorrow morning.
Bill, Herewith a copy of the agreement that I would want you to look over. It basically contains the clauses that we are bound to pass on to anybody that we bring into the project. We have some items on dress-code to assure that those who represent us at our customer's offices are presentable and maintain a prefessional image. If you work from home, of course, how you dress is your business. There is a paragraph about Time Sheets, in which we need your full cooperation and that is that the time-sheets are to be accompanied by a narrative of the work done, and the narrative and the time-sheet must be emailed to Jeff every day at the end of the day. His email address is jeff(at)cybersuperstore.com It is very important that we stay abreast of the work done and the only way is for our programmers to do that on a daily basis. The narrative of the work done should ideally be in a journal format, itemizing the items that were worked on and the problems that were encountered. If we are aware of problems that you encountered or problems that you may have solved in a special way, we can take the matter up with the customer, which could result in either a timely redesign or an action by the customer to avoid costly rework, among other benefits of having this information. The contract site is in Pasadena and the address is 2181 E. Foothill Blvd, Pasadena CA 91107. The directions from the 210 East is to exit at Sierra Madre Blvd / Altadena then turn right at the bottom of the exit and right again in Foothill. It is about a quarter mile further on on the right hand side, just next to the Self Storage. My cell phone number is (818) 421-4089 should you need to contact me. You can enter the address into mapquest and it will give you clear directions also. Let's meet at the site at, say 10:00 am. I will meet with you outside first, there is parking at the side of the road. I have created an email box for you at cybersuperstore: bill(at)cybersuperstore.com with password jvrooy. I will send you a test email. Please respond as soon as you receive it so that I know I have done that correctly. Thanks and I am looking forward working with you and to a long and prosperous relationship. Nico ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 09, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Test email
Bill Please hit Reply All just to let us know that the mailbox is working. It automatically forwards all email directly to dutchman(at)subconsciousstudios.com and a copy to Jeff and me as well so that we stay copied on your email. Please use this mailbox for all business mail. Thanks Nico ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 09, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Next Year
In a message dated 09/05/01 03:55:45 Pacific Daylight Time, rlegg(at)austarnet.com.au writes: > We have agreed by democratic processes on the Dayton, Ohio location for > 2003. > Does the Dayton memorandum bring with it a preferred weekend (are we trying > to coincide, preceed or back onto any strategic part of the Wright Bros > Centenary celebration schedules)? > If so we should identify which weekend and then do a count back to the same > weekend next year at a place to be determined but probably in Florida?? > I didn't see any responses to Mr. Legg's idea, but I think it's brilliant. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 10, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Next Year
In a message dated 9/9/2001 10:58:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time, CloudCraft(at)aol.com writes: > idn't see any responses to Mr. Legg's idea, but I think it's brilliant. Im on it, i'll let you know. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 10, 2001
From: Milt Concannon <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Flyin and sequelae
Pleasant surprise this week when I received my repair bill fromAero Air. Saturday callin and overtime for a welder and mechanic about 4hrs wok each total $350. Also recieved bill from Chris's mechanic in Tulsa for 7 hrs overtime (till midnight) less than $350. Then night before last someone broke into hanger and had my center panel out with radar and stormscope remove. Busted the panel, not sure about condition of equipment. Then last weekend while I was out in the wilderness without phone The USAF search and rescue center in Virginia calls my partner at 3AM looking for friends or relatives because they found my plane. Of course they would provide no details. As it turns out the ELT in my old plane had been set off and they wanted someone to turn it off. This was after 2 days of my friends thinking I had augered in somewhere. Good days and bad days life goes on. Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 10, 2001
From: Furlong5(at)aol.com <Furlong5(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Flyin and sequelae
In a message dated 9/10/2001 9:52:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time, mdcmd@ms-online.com writes: I have found Aero Air to be a really good company. Very impressed with them. Milt, sorry about the problems. Jim > Pleasant surprise this week when I received my repair bill fromAero Air. > Saturday callin and overtime for a welder and mechanic about 4hrs wok each > total $350. Also recieved bill from Chris's mechanic in Tulsa for 7 hrs > overtime (till midnight) less than $350. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 10, 2001
From: Barry Collman <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Next Year
Hi, Happy inhabitants of Commanderland! Not wishing to 'stick my nose in' or instigate a big debate, but isn't the Dayton celebration scheduled between the dates of 4th and 20th July 2003? In that case, that time of year will be, surely, too hot for certain locations, such as Florida. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think capt jimbob was looking at a 'weekend' which, no matter where the Fly-In is held, the weather will in all probability, and all things being equal, be pretty good, but not extreme one way or the other. Anyway, I'm certain that capt jimbob, ably aided and abetted by Susan, has got his thinking cap on and will come up with a more than suitable solution. Best Regards to All, Barry ----- Original Message ----- From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com To: rlegg(at)austarnet.com.au Cc: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 6:47 AM Subject: Re: Next Year In a message dated 09/05/01 03:55:45 Pacific Daylight Time, rlegg(at)austarnet.com.au writes: We have agreed by democratic processes on the Dayton, Ohio location for 2003. Does the Dayton memorandum bring with it a preferred weekend (are we trying to coincide, preceed or back onto any strategic part of the Wright Bros Centenary celebration schedules)? If so we should identify which weekend and then do a count back to the same weekend next year at a place to be determined but probably in Florida?? I didn't see any responses to Mr. Legg's idea, but I think it's brilliant. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 10, 2001
From: Barry Collman <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Flyin and sequelae
Hi Milt, So sorry to hear your bad news. I just hope that you get everything sorted out soon, and with the absolute minimum of hassle. Kindest Regards, Barry ----- Original Message ----- From: Milt Concannon To: Commander Chat Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 5:21 PM Subject: Flyin and sequelae Pleasant surprise this week when I received my repair bill fromAero Air. Saturday callin and overtime for a welder and mechanic about 4hrs wok each total $350. Also recieved bill from Chris's mechanic in Tulsa for 7 hrs overtime (till midnight) less than $350. Then night before last someone broke into hanger and had my center panel out with radar and stormscope remove. Busted the panel, not sure about condition of equipment. Then last weekend while I was out in the wilderness without phone The USAF search and rescue center in Virginia calls my partner at 3AM looking for friends or relatives because they found my plane. Of course they would provide no details. As it turns out the ELT in my old plane had been set off and they wanted someone to turn it off. This was after 2 days of my friends thinking I had augered in somewhere. Good days and bad days life goes on. Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 10, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Next Year
In a message dated 09/10/01 11:35:28 Pacific Daylight Time, barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk writes: > Not wishing to 'stick my nose in' or instigate a big debate, but isn't the > 4th of July. Why does that date ring a bell? Something happened on that date a few years ago and I can't quite remember ... none the less, those are good points that you make, Sir Barry. Notice that all the insight on the next Fly-In date is coming from offshore? I guess we Yanks (in this context that includes ya'll in the Southern contingent) won't have much to say until the event is to be held in Britain or Oz. Wing Commander Gordon PS: Dr. Milt. Sorry to hear about the avionics theft. If "having teenagers is punishment for having sex," is avionics-theft punishment for enjoying a Commander Fly-In as much? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 10, 2001
From: Barry Collman <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Next Year
Do you know, Wing Commander, I think you're right. Let me just get my history book to refresh my memory.......................... Ah! Well! Yes! OK, but we'd beat you at soccer. Also, just to get my own back, can I say that when you make tea in the USA, you're supposed to use hot water and add milk. You do not chuck it overboard from a ship into salt water, that just won't 'hit the spot' !! Or to Boston people prefer it that way, a kinda local thing? Or, do they call that ground bait, Big Al? Kindest Regards, Barry ----- Original Message ----- From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com To: barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk Cc: commanderchat@c2-tech.com Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:26 PM Subject: Re: Next Year In a message dated 09/10/01 11:35:28 Pacific Daylight Time, barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk writes: Not wishing to 'stick my nose in' or instigate a big debate, but isn't the Dayton celebration scheduled between the dates of 4th and 20th July 2003? 4th of July. Why does that date ring a bell? Something happened on that date a few years ago and I can't quite remember ... none the less, those are good points that you make, Sir Barry. Notice that all the insight on the next Fly-In date is coming from offshore? I guess we Yanks (in this context that includes ya'll in the Southern contingent) won't have much to say until the event is to be held in Britain or Oz. Wing Commander Gordon PS: Dr. Milt. Sorry to hear about the avionics theft. If "having teenagers is punishment for having sex," is avionics-theft punishment for enjoying a Commander Fly-In as much? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 10, 2001
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com <CloudCraft(at)aol.com>
Subject: 4th of July
In a message dated 09/10/01 13:12:08 Pacific Daylight Time, barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk writes: > Ah! Well! Yes! OK, but we'd beat you at soccer. > > Also, just to get my own back, can I say that when you make tea in the USA, > you're supposed to use hot water and add milk. > You do not chuck it overboard from a ship into salt water, that just won't > 'hit the spot' !! > That explains why we didn't take to tea -- I found it such a salty drink. But this soccer business ... good god, man! Tell your country men to pick up the ball and run with it. With their hands! Yes! Hold that bugger and slam through any opposition and knock over that silly guy in front of the net over for heaven's sake! Then you'd have some decent scores .. not these 1s and 2s. As for the rest, well, it's good thing both the R.A.F. and the Spitfire weren't in service in 1776. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 10, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: CLEAN SCREENS
HI KIDS........................ I just changed the oil in the "fleet" (2 GSO-480s and an R-985) I am happy report that the total metal in the screens would not have filled a coffee cup and no single piece was large enough to read a complete part number! Life is good! Had a really nice flight a few nights ago. Met TCFG member Jim Jorgenson and his father for a shot ride to dinner. It was the first time in 30 years his Dad had been in a light plane. Went to Harvey field and met Jim's wife at the "Buzz in." Nice eve and then a night flight into BFI. Got a close in downwind leg to 31R right past the space needle, the water front skyline and SAFECO field, (The Mariners won). What a great flight!! It was absolutely gorgeous and not a bump in the clear night air. We got to see the last outline of the Olympics just before "dark, dark" Anyway, was cool! I am just getting ready to jump in triple 2 with Rocky and TC and head home. The summer flying season is almost over :-(, it was a great one. Will fly through Sept if the weather holds. Hope all is well in Commanderland. capt jimbob ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 10, 2001
From: Milt <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: Re: Miss Sept online
Beautiful plan but that stained glass window is awsome. Milt ----- Original Message ----- From: Chris Schuermann <chris(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com> To: Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:54 PM Subject: Miss Sept online > Miss September 2001 - bilbo's 500A is now showing... > > In other news, I (aided by "Crunk" who was so kind as to drive > several hours to lend a hand AND bring cold beer) did a pre-purchase > inspection on N89PK over the weekend. (I would also add that 27 hours > of seat time in an old pickup was NOT fun!). She appears to be a > fine old bird and I committed to purchase. I brought the r/h engine > back with me to be overhauled. 89PK is a 680FP Commander with MRRPM > IO-720 engines and rayjay turbos. At this time all looks to be a "go" > for purchase as long as we don't find anything unexpected (ie: bad crank > or such) during the engine teardown. More later > > Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 10, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: Flyin and sequelae
I had a violent attack from this crap virus sircom and it took us quite a while to get our servers and customers clean again. You wouldn't believe the thoughts that went through my mind at the time especially if I imagine that I could lay my hands on these terrorists. Imagine what I would think if someone broke into my plane and violated it like that. Better not think. Sorry to hear about your damage, Milt. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: Milt Concannon To: Commander Chat Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:21 AM Subject: Flyin and sequelae Pleasant surprise this week when I received my repair bill fromAero Air. Saturday callin and overtime for a welder and mechanic about 4hrs wok each total $350. Also recieved bill from Chris's mechanic in Tulsa for 7 hrs overtime (till midnight) less than $350. Then night before last someone broke into hanger and had my center panel out with radar and stormscope remove. Busted the panel, not sure about condition of equipment. Then last weekend while I was out in the wilderness without phone The USAF search and rescue center in Virginia calls my partner at 3AM looking for friends or relatives because they found my plane. Of course they would provide no details. As it turns out the ELT in my old plane had been set off and they wanted someone to turn it off. This was after 2 days of my friends thinking I had augered in somewhere. Good days and bad days life goes on. Milt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: Dnode
Chris, I spoke with Jeff this morning and also reviewed the correspondence between you. It seems as if there are items that he has worked on that took longer than expected and which could be out of scope also, such as the auto email function. From what I understand, the auto email used to be hard-coded in the TSQL statements making it very rigid and maintainable by a programmer only. Jeff developed a template in which the emails can be more readily configured by the administrator making the application much more professional and user friendly. I would like to have your perception on this. I believe that the Wednesday 9/12 deadline was only set on Monday 9/10, which put a higher priority on his work schedule and if that urgency was not apparent in our correspondence, I apologize, but Jeff is confident that the items on your worklist will be completed in time. I trust that your concerns have been addressed and should you still feel uncomfortable with some issues, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thanks Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: Chris Buntine To: 'Nico van Niekerk' Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 4:39 PM Subject: Dnode Nico, I just wanted to raise a concern with you about the lack of progress on the software fixes we are communicating to Jeff. As I understand it you have seen these emails so are aware of our requests. I don't believe we have suggested anything major so I'm concerned about the fact that it's over a week since some of these requests have been made and no changes have been implemented. We want to make sure we resolve any operational problems in a timely manner in accordance with the contract but Jeff's apparent lack of responsiveness makes this difficult. If there is anyway we can better structure our requests to facilitate more rapid responsiveness we would be happy to do so. In the meantime we are trying to have a more robust system for Wednesday's demonstration. Regards, Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Email addresses
I will set up email addresses for our customers that you must use instead of their regular email addresses. I will configure these email addresses so that all relevant persons are copied on all correspondence and will email you later today with these addresses. Please change your address books accordingly. Thanks Nico ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: Milt Concannon <mdcmd@ms-online.com>
Subject: shit
Does this make our problems insignificant or what? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: Tylor Hall <tylorh(at)sound.net>
Subject: Re: shit
There are no words to describe it. Regards, Tylor Hall tylorh(at)sound.net 913-422-8869 -----Original Message----- From: Milt Concannon [mailto:mdcmd@ms-online.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:05 PM To: Commander Chat Subject: shit Does this make our problems insignificant or what? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: shit
Does this make our problems insignificant or what? Our prayers from the Hancock household to all..... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: Furlong5(at)aol.com <Furlong5(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: shit
In a message dated 9/11/2001 10:20:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time, mdcmd@ms-online.com writes: > > Does this make our problems insignificant or what? > > > ----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- > We knew it was coming. We just didn't know when. Now that it has happened it seems unreal. Who is the enemy? Where is the enemy? How do we retaliate? What a feeling of despair and impotence for this Marine. If - and a big IF - the perpertrators are - in fact - Islamic plotters - it is sad to envision them crashing into these buildings chanting "God is great" while they commit suicide and take so many thousands with them. This attack will have 5 to 10X casualties than Pearl Harbor. It is not inconceivable - but frightening - that the casualties could equal either the total of Korea or Viet Nam individually with one act of terrorism. With great sadness, Jim Furlong ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: shit
Things will never be the same, Milt. We have entered a new historical era. One may justly consider yesterday as the last day of the era of freedom or innocence. This is indeed the first day of the rest of our lives. Literally. Hope you all don't have relatives in NY. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: Milt Concannon To: Commander Chat Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:04 AM Subject: shit Does this make our problems insignificant or what? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: Bow <w.bow(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: shit
Re: shitGod help us. ----- Original Message ----- From: Barry Hancock To: Commander Chat Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 1:32 PM Subject: Re: shit Does this make our problems insignificant or what? Our prayers from the Hancock household to all..... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: shit
You are right. It is not the time to judge hastily. What we do know is that this should be dealt with with great efficiency and purpose. This morning, not only our enemies, but also our friends and even some citizens, should tremble, for just as Japan's generals said, after bombing Pearl Harbor, 'we have awakened the giant,' so they too must know now that they have disturbed and irrevocably destroyed the peace. There are some citizens also who believe that one can give up some of your principles to appease irrational threats. It doesn't work, because the signal of peace that is sent, is interpreted as weakness. I believe they have not only woke the giant, but they kicked the tiger in the nuts. It is not time to growl, it is time to hunt. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: Furlong5(at)aol.com To: mdcmd(at)ms-online.com ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:35 AM Subject: Re: shit In a message dated 9/11/2001 10:20:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time, mdcmd@ms-online.com writes: Does this make our problems insignificant or what? ----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- We knew it was coming. We just didn't know when. Now that it has happened it seems unreal. Who is the enemy? Where is the enemy? How do we retaliate? What a feeling of despair and impotence for this Marine. If - and a big IF - the perpertrators are - in fact - Islamic plotters - it is sad to envision them crashing into these buildings chanting "God is great" while they commit suicide and take so many thousands with them. This attack will have 5 to 10X casualties than Pearl Harbor. It is not inconceivable - but frightening - that the casualties could equal either the total of Korea or Viet Nam individually with one act of terrorism. With great sadness, Jim Furlong ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: Gary Kromer <service@commander-aero.com>
Subject: Re: shit
BRAVO!!!! Gary - Commander-Aero ----- Original Message ----- From: Nico van Niekerk To: Furlong5(at)aol.com ; mdcmd(at)ms-online.com ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:35 PM Subject: Re: shit You are right. It is not the time to judge hastily. What we do know is that this should be dealt with with great efficiency and purpose. This morning, not only our enemies, but also our friends and even some citizens, should tremble, for just as Japan's generals said, after bombing Pearl Harbor, 'we have awakened the giant,' so they too must know now that they have disturbed and irrevocably destroyed the peace. There are some citizens also who believe that one can give up some of your principles to appease irrational threats. It doesn't work, because the signal of peace that is sent, is interpreted as weakness. I believe they have not only woke the giant, but they kicked the tiger in the nuts. It is not time to growl, it is time to hunt. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: Furlong5(at)aol.com To: mdcmd(at)ms-online.com ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:35 AM Subject: Re: shit In a message dated 9/11/2001 10:20:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time, mdcmd@ms-online.com writes: Does this make our problems insignificant or what? ----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- We knew it was coming. We just didn't know when. Now that it has happened it seems unreal. Who is the enemy? Where is the enemy? How do we retaliate? What a feeling of despair and impotence for this Marine. If - and a big IF - the perpertrators are - in fact - Islamic plotters - it is sad to envision them crashing into these buildings chanting "God is great" while they commit suicide and take so many thousands with them. This attack will have 5 to 10X casualties than Pearl Harbor. It is not inconceivable - but frightening - that the casualties could equal either the total of Korea or Viet Nam individually with one act of terrorism. With great sadness, Jim Furlong ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: Ricardo A. Otaola <otayca(at)telcel.net.ve>
Subject: Re: shit
Absolutely!!!! The US can no longer stay within certain principles, ithas been kicked in the nuts. The middle east should take note of all of this. Ricardo A. Otaola ----- Original Message ----- From: Nico van Niekerk To: Furlong5(at)aol.com ; mdcmd(at)ms-online.com ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:35 PM Subject: Re: shit You are right. It is not the time to judge hastily. What we do know is that this should be dealt with with great efficiency and purpose. This morning, not only our enemies, but also our friends and even some citizens, should tremble, for just as Japan's generals said, after bombing Pearl Harbor, 'we have awakened the giant,' so they too must know now that they have disturbed and irrevocably destroyed the peace. There are some citizens also who believe that one can give up some of your principles to appease irrational threats. It doesn't work, because the signal of peace that is sent, is interpreted as weakness. I believe they have not only woke the giant, but they kicked the tiger in the nuts. It is not time to growl, it is time to hunt. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: Furlong5(at)aol.com To: mdcmd(at)ms-online.com ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:35 AM Subject: Re: shit In a message dated 9/11/2001 10:20:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time, mdcmd@ms-online.com writes: Does this make our problems insignificant or what? ----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- We knew it was coming. We just didn't know when. Now that it has happened it seems unreal. Who is the enemy? Where is the enemy? How do we retaliate? What a feeling of despair and impotence for this Marine. If - and a big IF - the perpertrators are - in fact - Islamic plotters - it is sad to envision them crashing into these buildings chanting "God is great" while they commit suicide and take so many thousands with them. This attack will have 5 to 10X casualties than Pearl Harbor. It is not inconceivable - but frightening - that the casualties could equal either the total of Korea or Viet Nam individually with one act of terrorism. With great sadness, Jim Furlong ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: PhilHackett(at)aol.com <PhilHackett(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: shit
Dear All, For what it is worth, it is being said here in the UK that; Clinton arranged a commission under Gore to examine airline security. It was found to be extremely poor. International flight security was brought up to European standards, but, the airlines did not want to ramp up Domestic security because, they said it would slow down the turn round of aircraft. They put the $ first. It is SIGNIFICANT that all these flights today were internal! Experts here are saying that this was just an obvious terrorist opportunity. Clinton always kept involved with the Far East, and kept the lid on the situation. BUSH turned his back on the problem when elected. Now it has come to him. Bush has an insular attitude to the world. It appears to us, that anything outside America does not exist for the average domestic citizen, or Bush. Most Americans do not realise that the USA Army is poorly trained, and when deployed in the Balkans recently, was put so far from danger, that most troops are even in different countries, from where the trouble is. If Politicians and Americans per se, keep pretending that American is Best, when patently it isn't, someone somewhere will take advantage of you, as happened today. You and we also, have allowed immigrants into our countries, who are intending to destroy us. The infrastructure exists for this to happen again, and again within both our countries. The people who struck today, learned from the aborted attempt to bomb the World Trade Centre eight years ago. The NY authorities did not. That is why so many emergency vehicles were crushed by debris. They were too close. It took three hours to evacuate the WT Centre eight years age. Nothing was done to improve on that, and as a result people died today. Your airline security people are so poorly trained, and paid,that Mcdonalds Burgher staff earn more. It is estimated that up to 20% of explosives, in tests, get past USA security staff. USA vulnerability is well known! We must all pray for those who perished today, and also those who suffer grief. Our lives will never be carefree again. The free, and safe world is a diminishing place. War has been declared on all of us, not just USA citizens, and Bush needs to grasp that the world is bigger than America. We are your greatest and most loyal allies. I hope Bush learns that from someone soon. I do not feel confident in him at all. God Bless All Of You. Phil ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: PhilHackett(at)aol.com <PhilHackett(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: shit
I agree with fighting back, but, there has to be a will to do so, in the free world. When Reagan wanted to bomb Gadaafi, we were the only country to stand by USA. Therein lies the problem. Satellites will make it possible to pinpoint the likely places where the worst terrorists hide. We should not be too shy about taking these people out. As Ever Phil ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: Randy Dettmer <rcdettmer(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: shit
In support of our country, I have put out the American Flag...and will fly it proudly. Randy Dettmer ----- Original Message ----- From: Milt Concannon To: Commander Chat Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:04 AM Subject: shit Does this make our problems insignificant or what? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: Ricardo A. Otaola <otayca(at)telcel.net.ve>
Subject: Re: shit
Absolutely!!!! The US can no longer stay within certain principles, ithas been kicked in the nuts. The middle east should take note of all of this. Ricardo A. Otaola ----- Original Message ----- From: Nico van Niekerk To: Furlong5(at)aol.com ; mdcmd(at)ms-online.com ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:35 PM Subject: Re: shit You are right. It is not the time to judge hastily. What we do know is that this should be dealt with with great efficiency and purpose. This morning, not only our enemies, but also our friends and even some citizens, should tremble, for just as Japan's generals said, after bombing Pearl Harbor, 'we have awakened the giant,' so they too must know now that they have disturbed and irrevocably destroyed the peace. There are some citizens also who believe that one can give up some of your principles to appease irrational threats. It doesn't work, because the signal of peace that is sent, is interpreted as weakness. I believe they have not only woke the giant, but they kicked the tiger in the nuts. It is not time to growl, it is time to hunt. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: Furlong5(at)aol.com To: mdcmd(at)ms-online.com ; commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:35 AM Subject: Re: shit In a message dated 9/11/2001 10:20:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time, mdcmd@ms-online.com writes: Does this make our problems insignificant or what? ----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- We knew it was coming. We just didn't know when. Now that it has happened it seems unreal. Who is the enemy? Where is the enemy? How do we retaliate? What a feeling of despair and impotence for this Marine. If - and a big IF - the perpertrators are - in fact - Islamic plotters - it is sad to envision them crashing into these buildings chanting "God is great" while they commit suicide and take so many thousands with them. This attack will have 5 to 10X casualties than Pearl Harbor. It is not inconceivable - but frightening - that the casualties could equal either the total of Korea or Viet Nam individually with one act of terrorism. With great sadness, Jim Furlong ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: John Vormbaum <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Tragedy
Commanderland, I was in the East Village this morning when the first plane hit the WTC. I was about 20 blocks northeast of the event and had a ringside view of the most significant military attack on the US since Pearl Harbor. It was totally surreal, and being in the physical presence of the events lends even more of a sense of pain and loss to it than any newscast could convey. Estimates of the casualties are shaping up but there is no definitive info yet; guesses put it somewhere between 6,000 and 40,000 souls. This was not an act of terrorism, but an act of war. I believe that each citizen who lost their life today was indeed killed in action, and that we must treat this as war. America is a truly amazing place. In the face of tragedy, I witnessed some amazing acts of heroism both live and on TV; the line to give blood was over 3 hours long when we went there at 11:30AM. NYC also showed that they have one of the finest police & fire forces in America. Walking from downtown to 33rd & 7th (Penn Station), I overheard countless conversations between pedestrians indicating our solidarity and the American values of morality, drive, determination, and vengeance. It was as if lines of color and class dissolved......all of NY is now filled with very, very, very angry Americans who want payback. If it was Osama Bin Laden who did this, I believe he will find that he made a major miscalculation. This could well be the event that unites America and causes us to put our foot down militarily, and shows the world that we ARE the most powerful nation on the planet....and that we won't stand for this violation of our homeland. I pray that many survivors are found and that the original estimates are inflated. /John ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: Barry Hancock <bdogltd(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: shit
We should all follow suit.... "One nation, under god, indivisible, with unity and justice for all." Barry Hancock Precision Flight Networks (949) 300-5510 bdogltd(at)pacbell.net From: Randy Dettmer <rcdettmer(at)charter.net> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 11:49:10 -0700 To: Milt Concannon <mdcmd@ms-online.com>, Commander Chat Subject: Re: shit In support of our country, I have put out the American Flag...and will fly it proudly. Randy Dettmer ----- Original Message ----- From: Milt Concannon <mailto:mdcmd@ms-online.com> To: Commander Chat Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:04 AM Subject: shit Does this make our problems insignificant or what? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: RnJThompson(at)aol.com <RnJThompson(at)aol.com>
Subject: SHIT
It is with deep sense of shock that Jacqui and I greet all of our friends in Commanderland. Our thoughts are with you all and we hope that none of you have any direct involvement in the tragedy. In my youth I spent a number of years invoved in the fight against terrorism in South Africa and have very strong views on the practices of these type of people. The world as a whole seems to have been very willing to find excuses for this kind of behavior over the last few decades.We have seen people (possibly with good intentions but no experience in the field) condemn hard line tactics used by many nations against these threats and people. What you have to understand is that the normal rules that we all try to live by dont apply to these people,who prey on the innocent and helpless because they are too cowardly to take on anyone who can fight back . I am very sorry to say this but WELCOME TO THE REAL WORLD. A number of nations around the world have been experiencing these attacks for decades. I am sorry that the US has now got to experience these actions on home soil. I hope that this acts as a catalyst for a new outlook on terrorism in any shape or form , THAT IT WILL NOT BE TOLERATED. I am sorry if the above might be a bit blunt but this has stirred up feelings that I have been suppressing for many years,hopefully thinking that this kind of thing was on the decline.But alas . I hope that your great nation and people take this in your stride and take all the appropriate measures to not allow it to happen again. As with your response to the actions of DEC 7, 1941 the time for polite chit-chat is over. OUR THOUGHTS ARE WITH YOU ALL. Regards Richard & Jacqui. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: shit
Phil, Thanks for your concerns. The US has its faults and in the aftermath every match-stick will be picked up, that I assure you. However, I am inclined to think that Clinton and his liberal policies have set us up to a large extent by his lackluster dealings with fanatics, who believe that the West should be destroyed - period. His negotiations in the Israel - Palestinian so-called peace process was a farce because he was interested in building a legacy only. This we know because of the pressure that was brought to bear on the Israelis to sacrifice so much territory and even after complying mostly with the demands of the Palestinians, Yssar Arafat declined and made further, unrealistic demands, basically trashing the process - proving that they never intended to agree on peace with Israel. This attack was very well planned. Think about it: visitors with valid visas enter the US. Apparently they did not have firearms or explosives - but that is not important now - they could have boarded the planes with only a plastic container of poisonous gas, or disassembled knives, checked in as first class passengers so that they would be located directly behind the cockpit, and just unexpectedly got up and overpowered the crew. Two people could walk the few steps in a matter of seconds, slit the throats of the pilot and co-pilot, get behind the yoke and - bang. There are only two ways to defend oneself against this very professional type of attack and that is, first, human intelligence: knowing what your adversaries are up to, and second, retaliate so hard that no one would ever in human memory try to do this again. I believe the US should throw the UN out of New York. Further we should flatten the capitols of Afghanistan, Algiers and other countries that threatened us before, but at night when the least amount of civilian life would be lost - giving them a chance that they did not give 50,000 US citizens. So, although there are faults in the system, and they failed us today, it does not mean that we should not bite back, and bite very, very hard. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: PhilHackett(at)aol.com To: nico(at)cybersuperstore.com Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:25 PM Subject: Re: shit Dear All, For what it is worth, it is being said here in the UK that; Clinton arranged a commission under Gore to examine airline security. It was found to be extremely poor. International flight security was brought up to European standards, but, the airlines did not want to ramp up Domestic security because, they said it would slow down the turn round of aircraft. They put the $ first. It is SIGNIFICANT that all these flights today were internal! Experts here are saying that this was just an obvious terrorist opportunity. Clinton always kept involved with the Far East, and kept the lid on the situation. BUSH turned his back on the problem when elected. Now it has come to him. Bush has an insular attitude to the world. It appears to us, that anything outside America does not exist for the average domestic citizen, or Bush. Most Americans do not realise that the USA Army is poorly trained, and when deployed in the Balkans recently, was put so far from danger, that most troops are even in different countries, from where the trouble is. If Politicians and Americans per se, keep pretending that American is Best, when patently it isn't, someone somewhere will take advantage of you, as happened today. You and we also, have allowed immigrants into our countries, who are intending to destroy us. The infrastructure exists for this to happen again, and again within both our countries. The people who struck today, learned from the aborted attempt to bomb the World Trade Centre eight years ago. The NY authorities did not. That is why so many emergency vehicles were crushed by debris. They were too close. It took three hours to evacuate the WT Centre eight years age. Nothing was done to improve on that, and as a result people died today. Your airline security people are so poorly trained, and paid,that Mcdonalds Burgher staff earn more. It is estimated that up to 20% of explosives, in tests, get past USA security staff. USA vulnerability is well known! We must all pray for those who perished today, and also those who suffer grief. Our lives will never be carefree again. The free, and safe world is a diminishing place. War has been declared on all of us, not just USA citizens, and Bush needs to grasp that the world is bigger than America. We are your greatest and most loyal allies. I hope Bush learns that from someone soon. I do not feel confident in him at all. God Bless All Of You. Phil ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: Furlong5(at)aol.com <Furlong5(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: shit
In a message dated 9/11/2001 4:03:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time, rcdettmer(at)charter.net writes: > > > In support of our country, I have put out the American Flag...and will fly > it proudly. > > Randy Dettmer > Randy, I did the same this morning along with the flag of the U.S. Marines. I have noticed that some of my neighbors have followed suit with the American Flag. I am hoping that the President will order all American flags at all US facilities all over the world be flown at half staff until the perpertrators of this attack have been brought to justice. Jim Furlong ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com <YOURTCFG(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: shit
pray............jb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: rncp
First off,tea is sumpthin ya drink when the preacher comes for supper,secondly,if you run out of coffee filters and you use your ole lady,s drawers to make a new pot,you might be a Red Necked Commander Pilot! HI ALL; BIG AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Milt
Milt,sorry about your run of luck,But to make you feel better,I'll fax you a pilot history sheet and you and I will go to TEN ASS SEE and bring Lucille to Jaws-acola, O K ? AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2001
From: Allen Reed <allen_reed2(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Sorry
Sorry Gang,But I feel that it's too late to be pointing fingers.Patton wanted to finish the job in WW2 but was not allowed to do so.President Bush wanted to finish the job,BUT NOOOO! The rest of the world(that we protect) would not let him.I say that enough is enough and this little-round red neck says,It's time to kick sum terorist ass,and this time finish the job! I'm not much on praying but every prayer I can muster,goes out to you all tonight,And GOD BLESS AMERICA. AL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 12, 2001
From: Nico van Niekerk <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Terrorism today
Thanks Richard & Jacqui. I was there when the communist ANC leader Nelson Mandela ordered the bombing of the Nedbank building in Pretoria killing many innocent people. The world then said it was in the interest of freedom and condoned it. I have many times flown at my own expense my Aero Commander into Mozambique filled with food and provisions after we were let back in after many years of communist rule and plunder. The country was in ruins. The world said it was in the interest of freedom and condoned it. In the '50s when the Belgic Congo received independence and thousands of people fled the horror of indiscriminate killing, the world said it was in the interest of freedom and condoned it. When the WTC was first bombed in '93, a 'feel good' policy caused millions of dollars to be spent on a trial that accomplished what? It made us feel good that the world will learn that we are a just people, a civilized nation. That, when we were not the ones who needed the education. When you preach to the choir, you can be sure of a captive audience. But try to get those who believe that you are but an idiot and an infidel to listen to your sermon, then, and only then are you making a difference. All else is nothing more that a waste of time and an exercise in self indulgence. But since the choir is there, what the hell, let's give them the treatment. It looks good on the news. When Panam's jet was blown out of the sky over Scotland, we had to beg and plead and wait. For what? So that the perpetrators could be handed over for trial. When Pearl Harbor was destroyed, we acted and nearly wiped Japan off the face of the map. That was sufficient for us to act. Is there a level of horror that we are prepared to play with and, ah, well, you know, we should show the world that we are a compassionate people and that our system will eventually execute justice? Or must we accept that once the level of horror reaches beyond a certain point, then we are prepared to speak the language of our adversary? But not sooner? While we have received blessings, freedom, and peace, and while we ate at the table of liberal politics, we have allowed our true focus to be blurred. We have become disciples of our own pleasure and laziness. We have allowed liberal socialists to sway our determination to remain a strong nation. We have allowed liberalism and 'feel good' politics to dumb our children down so that they do not know any longer what to strive for. We have allowed treacherous lies to confuse us in believing that killing a child is in the interest of comfort. We have allowed our own people to kill many fellow Americans in cold blood - a loss of life like we have seen today every year - and we did nothing. Oh, I am sorry, we actually did something. We debated it and argued about it. And then we did nothing. Sorry about that little oversight. President Bush is, in my opinion, a smart man (despite what the popular media insinuates about him) with extreme talent for strategy and finesse. (I mean, he navigated his way through an election while the media waited like roaring lions for him to set a foot wrong so that they could devour him.) I believe that he will seek wisdom from its Source and take whatever actions are necessary to prevent this from happening again. And pray that this nation comes to realize that terrorism is terrorism regardless of where and against whom it is perpetrated. The adage that 'one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter' does not apply to the US for two reasons: First, we are already free and second, we have no desire to terrorize anyone. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: RnJThompson(at)aol.com To: commanderchat(at)skymaster.c2-tech.com Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:47 PM Subject: SHIT It is with deep sense of shock that Jacqui and I greet all of our friends in Commanderland. Our thoughts are with you all and we hope that none of you have any direct involvement in the tragedy. In my youth I spent a number of years invoved in the fight against terrorism in South Africa and have very strong views on the practices of these type of people. The world as a whole seems to have been very willing to find excuses for this kind of behavior over the last few decades.We have seen people (possibly with good intentions but no experience in the field) condemn hard line tactics used by many nations against these threats and people. What you have to understand is that the normal rules that we all try to live by dont apply to these people,who prey on the innocent and helpless because they are too cowardly to take on anyone who can fight back . I am very sorry to say this but WELCOME TO THE REAL WORLD. A number of nations around the world have been experiencing these attacks for decades. I am sorry that the US has now got to experience these actions on home soil. I hope that this acts as a catalyst for a new outlook on terrorism in any shape or form , THAT IT WILL NOT BE TOLERATED. I am sorry if the above might be a bit blunt but this has stirred up feelings that I have been suppressing for many years,hopefully thinking that this kind of thing was on the decline.But alas . I hope that your great nation and people take this in your stride and take all the appropriate measures to not allow it to happen again. As with your response to the actions of DEC 7, 1941 the time for polite chit-chat is over. OUR THOUGHTS ARE WITH YOU ALL. Regards Richard & Jacqui. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 12, 2001
From: RnJThompson(at)aol.com <RnJThompson(at)aol.com>
Subject: rncp
In the face of adversity there is one shining light , BIG AL, you are alegend. Regards Richard ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 12, 2001
From: DAVID LAWSON <david(at)lawsoninc.net>
Subject: Re: shit
Phil: Your comments are interesting in light of your location. However, there more facts that must be fit into the equation. Mr. Bush inherited a dangerous legacy. He received a military which had been "gutted" over the prior eight years by the Clinton administration. You are correct in your comment re the US Army and its training. It impossible to maintain satisfactory levels of proficiency if you are restricted to a maximum of four hours of flying time each month (Black Hawke choppers), have an opportunity to fire live rounds two time a year, and have to take aircraft off the line to use for spare parts (and that only yields a 45/50%


August 08, 2001 - September 12, 2001

Commander-Archive.digest.vol-ad