Commander-Archive.digest.vol-bk

January 23, 2005 - February 10, 2005



      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: JBOBSTER(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 23, 2005
Subject: Straight 500 for sale
Gang anyone know anything about the straight 500 for sale at (gulp) Barron Thomas??? Appreciate any info.... Trying to get into my first Commander....maybe this is a candidate???? Jim Carroll Seattle WA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Curtis Perry <cperry(at)subictel.com>
Subject: Re: Straight 500 for sale
Date: Jan 23, 2005
Yes, we have a deposit on the aircraft and it's currently being inspected. If we don't push through with purchase I'll be glad to share the results of the inspection with you. Curt Perry On Jan 23, 2005, at 8:59 AM, JBOBSTER(at)aol.com wrote: > > Gang > > anyone know anything about the straight 500 for sale at (gulp) Barron > Thomas??? > > Appreciate any info.... > > Trying to get into my first Commander....maybe this is a candidate???? > > Jim Carroll > Seattle WA > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JBOBSTER(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 23, 2005
Subject: Re: Straight 500 for sale
Curt appreciate the feedback.... Jim C ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ray Mansfield" <hcourier(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re:
Date: Jan 23, 2005
Don't think there's an easy way. Just had that done to the 680FLP, IO-720 I fly by an A&P, took him quite a while. Not sure how long but I think we're talking 1-2 hrs, however I do think it was his first time doing the job. . Ray M. ----- Original Message ----- From: "MASON CHEVAILLIER" <Kamala(at)msn.com> Subject: Commander-List: > > DOES ANYONE HAVE A EASY ACCESS AND WAY TO CHANGE A GARLOCK SEAL AND GASKET > AND THE HYDROLIC PUMP ON OFF THE ACCESSORY CASE ON AN IO720 EQUIPED 680FP? > THANK YOU FOR ANY HELP. MASON N2001M > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com>
Subject: FAA Action
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Hi everyone, I haven't posted here for quite awhile, seems life keeps changing things and we have to change to keep up. I've been so busy with my business I Just haven't had much spare time. But we had some things happening here during the last few weeks I think you may be interested in. We had some record breaking flooding here the week of January 10, many homes were washed away and completely destroyed, 50 at last count are either gone or condemned. Anyway, during the flooding my son Jeremy volunteered his R44 and himself to help out and ended up flying pretty much non-stop for 4 or 5 days doing everything from rescuing people caught by the rising water to delivering food to people who were cut off from town and even ferrying some dynamite and the demolition man across the river so he could try and clear a debris dam that was diverting the flood toward some homes. I'm very proud of Jeremy as he did this all on his dime, and would not accept any compensation from anyone. He also offered to give tours to anyone who would donate $100.00 toward helping out one family that had lost everything. He ended up raising around $20,000.00 that went to them to help them get back on their feet. Well it appears he may have violated some FAR's in doing all this and a Helio pilot flying a Blackhawk for the state turned him in to the FAA so they have launched an investigation. There's an article about it on AVWEB: http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archives/avflash/341-full.html#189017 if you want to read about it. It's pretty sad to think our Government officials have so little sense or ability to look at a situation and determine if it has anything to do with why a rule was written or not before they take such an action. Reminds me of the Scribes and Pharoses in the Gospels, they know the rule book by memory, but don't have a lick of sense. KV Electric, INC. Kerry Johnson 1139 North 1210 West St. George, UT 84770 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brock Lorber" <blorber(at)vegasfc.com>
Subject:
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Ray: I want your A&P! I haven't found anyone who can do anything to the IO-720s in less than 1-2 weeks, let alone 1-2 hours! Thank goodness I do my own oil changes, or the airplane would never fly! Mason: The pump and seal are located in the second most fun to work on spot on the entire airplane (the first is where the electric fuel pump lives in the aft nacelle). Once you move or remove the induction hoses, fuel/oil/hydraulic/upper deck lines, and air cleaner (if you are working on the right engine), the real fun begins. A good set of stubby end wrenches, dexterous fingers, a powerful magnet, aspirin, and a fifth of Jack Daniels are required tools. Just bend your arm under the turbo and over the hydraulic pump, and with the tips of two fingers, put the wrench on the nuts on the fuel pump side of the hydraulic pump. Loosen approximately 1/64th of one thread (you won't be able to move the wrench any more than that), flip the wrench over, and reposition on the nut. After two or three cycles, your fingers will get tired. Don't worry, you will soon drop the wrench (which will slide under the fuel servo and wedge itself between the bottom of the compartment and the fuel servo) giving you a much needed break. By the way, all four nuts on the hydraulic pump need to be backed off more or less together, or they will become jam nuts on the case of the hydraulic pump. After all four nuts and washers are off the pump and you've fished them out of the oil in the bottom of the engine compartment, remove the pump and replace the seal and gasket. Take time to congratulate yourself at this point; you are approximately 10% complete with this project! Replacement makes removal look like a snap! Or...get Ray's A&P to do it! Good luck! Trust me, I feel for you. Brock - 400CH -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ray Mansfield Subject: Re: Commander-List: Don't think there's an easy way. Just had that done to the 680FLP, IO-720 I fly by an A&P, took him quite a while. Not sure how long but I think we're talking 1-2 hrs, however I do think it was his first time doing the job. . Ray M. ----- Original Message ----- From: "MASON CHEVAILLIER" <Kamala(at)msn.com> Subject: Commander-List: > > DOES ANYONE HAVE A EASY ACCESS AND WAY TO CHANGE A GARLOCK SEAL AND GASKET > AND THE HYDROLIC PUMP ON OFF THE ACCESSORY CASE ON AN IO720 EQUIPED 680FP? > THANK YOU FOR ANY HELP. MASON N2001M > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "dcm@c-sw.com" <dcm@c-sw.com>
Subject: [Q] *REAL* Commander Ownership Cost
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Greetings Group, Can someone *ballpark* relative costs of ownership of an older Twin Commander (e.g. 520, 560, 500) for a wanna-be-owner? (I know it depends on aircraft condition, but I am looking for a couple of data points from individual experiences.) Please note that I am not a Twin Commander owner, but am fascinated with the design. Keep in mind that I am in my 2nd ownership experience (Beech Sundowner). I previously owned a Piper Lance. In general terms, my ownership experiences so far have shown that the first annual has been the only rough experience, costing an amount equal to 5-10% of the purchase price. Buying has been the easiest part, perhaps because it is exciting! (I always do a pre-buy inspection, BTW.) My maintenance shop is meticulous and it takes $$$ to get "up to their standards". Any and all information will be much appreciated! Kind Regards, David ________________________________________________________________________________
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Subject: Re: FAA Action
In a message dated 1/24/2005 7:04:46 AM Pacific Standard Time, kerry(at)kvelectric.com writes: It's pretty sad to think our Government officials have so little sense or ability to look at a situation and determine if it has anything to do with why a rule was written or not before they take such an action. Reminds me of the Scribes and Pharoses in the Gospels, they know the rule book by memory, but don't have a lick of sense. I am sorry to report that this is the way the FAA operates and has for about 3 decades now. They took Bob Hoover down and will almost certainly get this guy as well. Boston Tea party anyone?? jb ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bobby Sather" <sather(at)charter.net>
Subject: FAA Action
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Does anyone have the name of the helio pilot that was flying the Blackhawk? -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kerry Johnson Subject: Commander-List: FAA Action Hi everyone, I haven't posted here for quite awhile, seems life keeps changing things and we have to change to keep up. I've been so busy with my business I Just haven't had much spare time. But we had some things happening here during the last few weeks I think you may be interested in. We had some record breaking flooding here the week of January 10, many homes were washed away and completely destroyed, 50 at last count are either gone or condemned. Anyway, during the flooding my son Jeremy volunteered his R44 and himself to help out and ended up flying pretty much non-stop for 4 or 5 days doing everything from rescuing people caught by the rising water to delivering food to people who were cut off from town and even ferrying some dynamite and the demolition man across the river so he could try and clear a debris dam that was diverting the flood toward some homes. I'm very proud of Jeremy as he did this all on his dime, and would not accept any compensation from anyone. He also offered to give tours to anyone who would donate $100.00 toward helping out one family that had lost everything. He ended up raising around $20,000.00 that went to them to help them get back on their feet. Well it appears he may have violated some FAR's in doing all this and a Helio pilot flying a Blackhawk for the state turned him in to the FAA so they have launched an investigation. There's an article about it on AVWEB: http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archives/avflash/341-full.html#189017 if you want to read about it. It's pretty sad to think our Government officials have so little sense or ability to look at a situation and determine if it has anything to do with why a rule was written or not before they take such an action. Reminds me of the Scribes and Pharoses in the Gospels, they know the rule book by memory, but don't have a lick of sense. KV Electric, INC. Kerry Johnson 1139 North 1210 West St. George, UT 84770 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com>
Subject: FAA Action
Date: Jan 24, 2005
I could probably find it, but what good would that do? -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bobby Sather Subject: RE: Commander-List: FAA Action --> Does anyone have the name of the helio pilot that was flying the Blackhawk? -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kerry Johnson Subject: Commander-List: FAA Action Hi everyone, I haven't posted here for quite awhile, seems life keeps changing things and we have to change to keep up. I've been so busy with my business I Just haven't had much spare time. But we had some things happening here during the last few weeks I think you may be interested in. We had some record breaking flooding here the week of January 10, many homes were washed away and completely destroyed, 50 at last count are either gone or condemned. Anyway, during the flooding my son Jeremy volunteered his R44 and himself to help out and ended up flying pretty much non-stop for 4 or 5 days doing everything from rescuing people caught by the rising water to delivering food to people who were cut off from town and even ferrying some dynamite and the demolition man across the river so he could try and clear a debris dam that was diverting the flood toward some homes. I'm very proud of Jeremy as he did this all on his dime, and would not accept any compensation from anyone. He also offered to give tours to anyone who would donate $100.00 toward helping out one family that had lost everything. He ended up raising around $20,000.00 that went to them to help them get back on their feet. Well it appears he may have violated some FAR's in doing all this and a Helio pilot flying a Blackhawk for the state turned him in to the FAA so they have launched an investigation. There's an article about it on AVWEB: http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archives/avflash/341-full.html#189017 if you want to read about it. It's pretty sad to think our Government officials have so little sense or ability to look at a situation and determine if it has anything to do with why a rule was written or not before they take such an action. Reminds me of the Scribes and Pharoses in the Gospels, they know the rule book by memory, but don't have a lick of sense. KV Electric, INC. Kerry Johnson 1139 North 1210 West St. George, UT 84770 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Subject: Re: FAA Action
In a message dated 24-Jan-05 07:04:46 Pacific Standard Time, kerry(at)kvelectric.com writes: > Well it appears he may have violated some FAR's in doing all this and a > Helio pilot flying a Blackhawk for the state turned him in to the FAA so > they have launched an investigation. > What FARs did he violate? Name chapter and verse; that's the only way to mount a defense. Wing Commander Gordon Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bobby Sather" <sather(at)charter.net>
Subject: FAA Action
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Just curious, I think a letter to the Blackhawk pilot would be in order for being so officious. I also think that letters to the FAA on this subject would be good. I live in the Washington, Utah area and admire Jeremy's efforts in helping those in need. This was such a terrible tragedy for so many families and to reprimanded for the things he did is also a tragedy. To receive compensation for services without part 135 is against the law. But he did not receive compensation but suggested a donation to a charitable cause. Where can this be viewed as compensation is beyond my understanding. I believe the FAA has a responsibility to explain the violation to us so we understand. Bobby Sather -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kerry Johnson Subject: RE: Commander-List: FAA Action I could probably find it, but what good would that do? -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bobby Sather Subject: RE: Commander-List: FAA Action --> Does anyone have the name of the helio pilot that was flying the Blackhawk? -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kerry Johnson Subject: Commander-List: FAA Action Hi everyone, I haven't posted here for quite awhile, seems life keeps changing things and we have to change to keep up. I've been so busy with my business I Just haven't had much spare time. But we had some things happening here during the last few weeks I think you may be interested in. We had some record breaking flooding here the week of January 10, many homes were washed away and completely destroyed, 50 at last count are either gone or condemned. Anyway, during the flooding my son Jeremy volunteered his R44 and himself to help out and ended up flying pretty much non-stop for 4 or 5 days doing everything from rescuing people caught by the rising water to delivering food to people who were cut off from town and even ferrying some dynamite and the demolition man across the river so he could try and clear a debris dam that was diverting the flood toward some homes. I'm very proud of Jeremy as he did this all on his dime, and would not accept any compensation from anyone. He also offered to give tours to anyone who would donate $100.00 toward helping out one family that had lost everything. He ended up raising around $20,000.00 that went to them to help them get back on their feet. Well it appears he may have violated some FAR's in doing all this and a Helio pilot flying a Blackhawk for the state turned him in to the FAA so they have launched an investigation. There's an article about it on AVWEB: http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archives/avflash/341-full.html#189017 if you want to read about it. It's pretty sad to think our Government officials have so little sense or ability to look at a situation and determine if it has anything to do with why a rule was written or not before they take such an action. Reminds me of the Scribes and Pharoses in the Gospels, they know the rule book by memory, but don't have a lick of sense. KV Electric, INC. Kerry Johnson 1139 North 1210 West St. George, UT 84770 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com>
Subject: FAA Action
Date: Jan 24, 2005
The letter Jeremy got from the FAA just says that they are launching an investigation. Once they finish their investigation they will let he know which FAR's they believe he violated and he will be able to respond to them. By the way, the FAA has already received letters from Mayor Denny Drake of Santa Clara, and Kirk Smith, Washington County Sheriff stating that Jeremy was under their direction and that he refused any compensation, even for fuel costs. -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of CloudCraft(at)aol.com Subject: Re: Commander-List: FAA Action In a message dated 24-Jan-05 07:04:46 Pacific Standard Time, kerry(at)kvelectric.com writes: > Well it appears he may have violated some FAR's in doing all this and > a Helio pilot flying a Blackhawk for the state turned him in to the > FAA so they have launched an investigation. > What FARs did he violate? Name chapter and verse; that's the only way to mount a defense. Wing Commander Gordon Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com>
Subject: FAA Action
Date: Jan 24, 2005
I'll find out they guys name and who he was working for, probably post it here tomorrow. -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bobby Sather Subject: RE: Commander-List: FAA Action --> Just curious, I think a letter to the Blackhawk pilot would be in order for being so officious. I also think that letters to the FAA on this subject would be good. I live in the Washington, Utah area and admire Jeremy's efforts in helping those in need. This was such a terrible tragedy for so many families and to reprimanded for the things he did is also a tragedy. To receive compensation for services without part 135 is against the law. But he did not receive compensation but suggested a donation to a charitable cause. Where can this be viewed as compensation is beyond my understanding. I believe the FAA has a responsibility to explain the violation to us so we understand. Bobby Sather -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kerry Johnson Subject: RE: Commander-List: FAA Action I could probably find it, but what good would that do? -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bobby Sather Subject: RE: Commander-List: FAA Action --> Does anyone have the name of the helio pilot that was flying the Blackhawk? -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kerry Johnson Subject: Commander-List: FAA Action Hi everyone, I haven't posted here for quite awhile, seems life keeps changing things and we have to change to keep up. I've been so busy with my business I Just haven't had much spare time. But we had some things happening here during the last few weeks I think you may be interested in. We had some record breaking flooding here the week of January 10, many homes were washed away and completely destroyed, 50 at last count are either gone or condemned. Anyway, during the flooding my son Jeremy volunteered his R44 and himself to help out and ended up flying pretty much non-stop for 4 or 5 days doing everything from rescuing people caught by the rising water to delivering food to people who were cut off from town and even ferrying some dynamite and the demolition man across the river so he could try and clear a debris dam that was diverting the flood toward some homes. I'm very proud of Jeremy as he did this all on his dime, and would not accept any compensation from anyone. He also offered to give tours to anyone who would donate $100.00 toward helping out one family that had lost everything. He ended up raising around $20,000.00 that went to them to help them get back on their feet. Well it appears he may have violated some FAR's in doing all this and a Helio pilot flying a Blackhawk for the state turned him in to the FAA so they have launched an investigation. There's an article about it on AVWEB: http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archives/avflash/341-full.html#189017 if you want to read about it. It's pretty sad to think our Government officials have so little sense or ability to look at a situation and determine if it has anything to do with why a rule was written or not before they take such an action. Reminds me of the Scribes and Pharoses in the Gospels, they know the rule book by memory, but don't have a lick of sense. KV Electric, INC. Kerry Johnson 1139 North 1210 West St. George, UT 84770 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com>
Subject: FAA Action
Date: Jan 24, 2005
I forgot to add that the two they seem fixated on are one about transporting explosives without a HAZMAT permit, when he transported the dynamite and demo man across the river and that he didn't give the FAA 7 days notice before he did the charity/donation flights I don't know the chapter and verse off hand. -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of CloudCraft(at)aol.com Subject: Re: Commander-List: FAA Action In a message dated 24-Jan-05 07:04:46 Pacific Standard Time, kerry(at)kvelectric.com writes: > Well it appears he may have violated some FAR's in doing all this and > a Helio pilot flying a Blackhawk for the state turned him in to the > FAA so they have launched an investigation. > What FARs did he violate? Name chapter and verse; that's the only way to mount a defense. Wing Commander Gordon Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: FAA Action
Date: Jan 24, 2005
So many folks would like to earn a buck or two by making a willing passenger pay for the privilege of air transportation. We are not talking about packing a plane full of unsuspecting pax and then fly them somewhere under the impression that they are getting a very good deal in competition with Delta, or Southwest. But, if there is a willing customer who understands the risks (private pilot, SE plane, short trip) and a willing pilot, why would it be wrong to practice free enterprise? Prosecuting Jeremy, if he used his own chopper to help save lives, would see folks in future sit with folded arms while others lose their lives. If the pilot is prepared to face serious consequences for the sake of others, without a change in the law, it becomes a one-way ticket because if Jeremy loses his license, he would most likely sell his chopper and next time, he will be compelled to sit and watch folks in trouble go down anyway. So, nobody would lift a finger. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com> Subject: Commander-List: FAA Action > > Hi everyone, > > I haven't posted here for quite awhile, seems life keeps changing things > and we have to change to keep up. I've been so busy with my business I > Just haven't had much spare time. But we had some things happening here > during the last few weeks I think you may be interested in. > > We had some record breaking flooding here the week of January 10, many > homes were washed away and completely destroyed, 50 at last count are > either gone or condemned. Anyway, during the flooding my son Jeremy > volunteered his R44 and himself to help out and ended up flying pretty > much non-stop for 4 or 5 days doing everything from rescuing people > caught by the rising water to delivering food to people who were cut off > from town and even ferrying some dynamite and the demolition man across > the river so he could try and clear a debris dam that was diverting the > flood toward some homes. I'm very proud of Jeremy as he did this all on > his dime, and would not accept any compensation from anyone. He also > offered to give tours to anyone who would donate $100.00 toward helping > out one family that had lost everything. He ended up raising around > $20,000.00 that went to them to help them get back on their feet. > > Well it appears he may have violated some FAR's in doing all this and a > Helio pilot flying a Blackhawk for the state turned him in to the FAA so > they have launched an investigation. > > There's an article about it on AVWEB: > http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archives/avflash/341-full.html#189017 if > you want to read about it. > > It's pretty sad to think our Government officials have so little sense > or ability to look at a situation and determine if it has anything to do > with why a rule was written or not before they take such an action. > Reminds me of the Scribes and Pharoses in the Gospels, they know the > rule book by memory, but don't have a lick of sense. > > KV Electric, INC. > > Kerry Johnson > 1139 North 1210 West > St. George, UT 84770 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: FAA Action
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Oh, it's a natural desire to go and read to him Leviticus, you know. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com> Subject: RE: Commander-List: FAA Action > > I could probably find it, but what good would that do? > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bobby > Sather > To: commander-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RE: Commander-List: FAA Action > > > --> > > Does anyone have the name of the helio pilot that was flying the > Blackhawk? > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kerry > Johnson > To: 'Commander Chat' > Subject: Commander-List: FAA Action > > > > Hi everyone, > > I haven't posted here for quite awhile, seems life keeps changing things > and we have to change to keep up. I've been so busy with my business I > Just haven't had much spare time. But we had some things happening here > during the last few weeks I think you may be interested in. > > We had some record breaking flooding here the week of January 10, many > homes were washed away and completely destroyed, 50 at last count are > either gone or condemned. Anyway, during the flooding my son Jeremy > volunteered his R44 and himself to help out and ended up flying pretty > much non-stop for 4 or 5 days doing everything from rescuing people > caught by the rising water to delivering food to people who were cut off > from town and even ferrying some dynamite and the demolition man across > the river so he could try and clear a debris dam that was diverting the > flood toward some homes. I'm very proud of Jeremy as he did this all on > his dime, and would not accept any compensation from anyone. He also > offered to give tours to anyone who would donate $100.00 toward helping > out one family that had lost everything. He ended up raising around > $20,000.00 that went to them to help them get back on their feet. > > Well it appears he may have violated some FAR's in doing all this and a > Helio pilot flying a Blackhawk for the state turned him in to the FAA so > they have launched an investigation. > > There's an article about it on AVWEB: > http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archives/avflash/341-full.html#189017 if > you want to read about it. > > It's pretty sad to think our Government officials have so little sense > or ability to look at a situation and determine if it has anything to do > with why a rule was written or not before they take such an action. > Reminds me of the Scribes and Pharoses in the Gospels, they know the > rule book by memory, but don't have a lick of sense. > > KV Electric, INC. > > Kerry Johnson > 1139 North 1210 West > St. George, UT 84770 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Subject: Re: FAA Action
In a message dated 24-Jan-05 09:29:10 Pacific Standard Time, kerry(at)kvelectric.com writes: > By the way, the FAA has already received letters from Mayor Denny Drake > of Santa Clara, and Kirk Smith, Washington County Sheriff stating that > Jeremy was under their direction and that he refused any compensation, > even for fuel costs. If he was, indeed, operating as a "Public Service" aircraft, he is exempt from all FARs. When I flew (an Aero Commander, of course!) on contract for the U. S. Forest Service, I learned that the San Bernadino Sheriff's helicopter pilot did not have a license. And the surplus military helo did not have an airworthiness certificate. Didn't have to: public service aircraft. To be fair, most government agencies do operate under Part 91, if not 135 rules, but they do not have to and if the Sheriff will stand up to the FAA,=20it should all go away. (Would have been nice if he had been deputized) Wing Commander Gordon Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com>
Subject: FAA Action
Date: Jan 24, 2005
I'm aware of the "Public Service" exemption and I it should negate any FAA action on everything except the charity rides. If it really gets ugly and the FAA won't back off, we will probably give Senator Bennett a call and see if he can help out. Since he is on the Transportation Appropriations Committee I think he would have a little influence. I just think it is such a sad affair that a government agency, that is specifically there to protect the public would be so myopic as to believe that prosecuting anyone who did what Jeremy did would promote the public good. It seems counter-productive to me. -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of CloudCraft(at)aol.com Subject: Re: Commander-List: FAA Action In a message dated 24-Jan-05 09:29:10 Pacific Standard Time, kerry(at)kvelectric.com writes: > By the way, the FAA has already received letters from Mayor Denny > Drake of Santa Clara, and Kirk Smith, Washington County Sheriff > stating that Jeremy was under their direction and that he refused any > compensation, even for fuel costs. If he was, indeed, operating as a "Public Service" aircraft, he is exempt from all FARs. When I flew (an Aero Commander, of course!) on contract for the U. S. Forest Service, I learned that the San Bernadino Sheriff's helicopter pilot did not have a license. And the surplus military helo did not have an airworthiness certificate. Didn't have to: public service aircraft. To be fair, most government agencies do operate under Part 91, if not 135 rules, but they do not have to and if the Sheriff will stand up to the FAA,=20it should all go away. (Would have been nice if he had been deputized) Wing Commander Gordon Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Subject: Re: FAA Action
In a message dated 24-Jan-05 10:20:52 Pacific Standard Time, kerry(at)kvelectric.com writes: > If it really gets ugly and the FAA won't back off, we will probably give > Senator Bennett a call and see if he can help out. Since he is on the > Transportation Appropriations Committee I think he would have a little > influence. Don't wait. Start that process right now. You'll save tons of time if you do. Maybe even head it off at the pass. Re: the Blackhawk pilot reporting Jeremy ... I am not apologizing for him or his actions be aware that when agencies are working an incident they get territorial. They're busy, they're communicating on discreet frequencies and any "outsider" is an intruder, regardless of intent. Jeremy was doing excellent work but he may have gotten near their Ops and that's a real hot button. Again, from my Air Attack days, we'd have all these inter-agency aircraft working together in a tightly orchestrated dance and a news helicopter or power company helicopter would show up and piss everyone off. That's could be what's happened here. Sending the Blackhawk pilot a letter in a moot point now. It's in the FAA's hands and it has to be quashed. Pressure from higher up than the FSDO office has to be applied because FSDO has their bible they have to go by unless there's "divine intervention." This is where a Senator comes in handy. Anyone who has met the FAA knows this. Wing Commander Gordon Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com>
Subject: FAA Action
Date: Jan 24, 2005
The one Blackhawk was the only Government aircraft here during the whole time, so I don't know who he could have been talking to on a discrete freq. From what I've heard he was a real jerk, but since I didn't actually see him do any of the things I've heard he did, I won't repeat them. There was one incident Jeremy told me about that may have been the his reason to tattling. He (Blackhawk) had landed out in the boonies by Matoquaw to pick up some stragglers, he told the Sheriff he would only wait 5 minutes and then would leave. He took off with three people driving to get to him that were within half a block, thereby stranding them. Jeremy went in after he left and picked them up per the Sheriff's request. Jeremy also tells me now, that the Blackhawk pilot is the FAA official that has been assigned to "investigate". With that last bit of information, I think I agree with you, that it's time to contact Senator Bennett. -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of CloudCraft(at)aol.com Subject: Re: Commander-List: FAA Action In a message dated 24-Jan-05 10:20:52 Pacific Standard Time, kerry(at)kvelectric.com writes: > If it really gets ugly and the FAA won't back off, we will probably > give Senator Bennett a call and see if he can help out. Since he is on > the Transportation Appropriations Committee I think he would have a > little influence. Don't wait. Start that process right now. You'll save tons of time if you do. Maybe even head it off at the pass. Re: the Blackhawk pilot reporting Jeremy ... I am not apologizing for him or his actions be aware that when agencies are working an incident they get territorial. They're busy, they're communicating on discreet frequencies and any "outsider" is an intruder, regardless of intent. Jeremy was doing excellent work but he may have gotten near their Ops and that's a real hot button. Again, from my Air Attack days, we'd have all these inter-agency aircraft working together in a tightly orchestrated dance and a news helicopter or power company helicopter would show up and piss everyone off. That's could be what's happened here. Sending the Blackhawk pilot a letter in a moot point now. It's in the FAA's hands and it has to be quashed. Pressure from higher up than the FSDO office has to be applied because FSDO has their bible they have to go by unless there's "divine intervention." This is where a Senator comes in handy. Anyone who has met the FAA knows this. Wing Commander Gordon Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom Fisher" <tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca>
Subject: Re: FAA Action
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Kerry, without yet reading the article you do understand that these rules are all to protect the general public. I am a seasoned helicopter pilot with years of IFR medevac experience. I needed to take "dangerous goods transportation" courses throughout my career in order to carry same. Flying dynamite takes knowledge in order to do it safely. I have seen private operators flying from fair to fair in the summer offering tours if the manager of the fair got a cut (did it myself in my youth). Some of these helicopters were flying with time X engines (not mine) allowed in the private sector but not in the commercial sector. In the rescue business one takes precautions in order not to make the situation worse by killing additional people. It's all risky at best. I hope this young lad manages his way through the FAA red tape. I support his actions hoping that he knew everything was as it should be with his equipment and training which will be accepted by the FAA. Tom F ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com> Subject: Commander-List: FAA Action > > Hi everyone, > > I haven't posted here for quite awhile, seems life keeps changing things > and we have to change to keep up. I've been so busy with my business I > Just haven't had much spare time. But we had some things happening here > during the last few weeks I think you may be interested in. > > We had some record breaking flooding here the week of January 10, many > homes were washed away and completely destroyed, 50 at last count are > either gone or condemned. Anyway, during the flooding my son Jeremy > volunteered his R44 and himself to help out and ended up flying pretty > much non-stop for 4 or 5 days doing everything from rescuing people > caught by the rising water to delivering food to people who were cut off > from town and even ferrying some dynamite and the demolition man across > the river so he could try and clear a debris dam that was diverting the > flood toward some homes. I'm very proud of Jeremy as he did this all on > his dime, and would not accept any compensation from anyone. He also > offered to give tours to anyone who would donate $100.00 toward helping > out one family that had lost everything. He ended up raising around > $20,000.00 that went to them to help them get back on their feet. > > Well it appears he may have violated some FAR's in doing all this and a > Helio pilot flying a Blackhawk for the state turned him in to the FAA so > they have launched an investigation. > > There's an article about it on AVWEB: > http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archives/avflash/341-full.html#189017 if > you want to read about it. > > It's pretty sad to think our Government officials have so little sense > or ability to look at a situation and determine if it has anything to do > with why a rule was written or not before they take such an action. > Reminds me of the Scribes and Pharoses in the Gospels, they know the > rule book by memory, but don't have a lick of sense. > > KV Electric, INC. > > Kerry Johnson > 1139 North 1210 West > St. George, UT 84770 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom Fisher" <tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca>
Subject: Re: [Q] *REAL* Commander Ownership Cost
Date: Jan 24, 2005
You heard the old saying, "if you have to ask how much it costs to operate you can't afford it". I intend to buck that theory myself, good luck. Tom F ----- Original Message ----- From: <dcm@c-sw.com> Subject: Commander-List: [Q] *REAL* Commander Ownership Cost > > Greetings Group, > > Can someone *ballpark* relative costs of ownership of an older Twin > Commander (e.g. 520, 560, 500) for a wanna-be-owner? (I know it depends on > aircraft condition, but I am looking for a couple of data points from > individual experiences.) Please note that I am not a Twin Commander owner, > but am fascinated with the design. Keep in mind that I am in my 2nd > ownership experience (Beech Sundowner). I previously owned a Piper Lance. > > In general terms, my ownership experiences so far have shown that the first > annual has been the only rough experience, costing an amount equal to 5-10% > of the purchase price. Buying has been the easiest part, perhaps because > it is exciting! (I always do a pre-buy inspection, BTW.) My maintenance > shop is meticulous and it takes $$$ to get "up to their standards". > > Any and all information will be much appreciated! > > Kind Regards, > David > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "dcm@c-sw.com" <dcm@c-sw.com>
Subject: [Q] What's It Really Worth (Ballpark)?
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Greetings Group, In Trade-A-Plane, I saw the following: "1954 560, S/N 186, SEATS 7, Needs paint. All new glass, New Props (30 hrs), New oil filtration, Dual Narco MK-12D NavComs, HSI. 3400 AFTT, 1260 SMOH. Last annual 11/2001. $45K, CA/(831) 335-2745." The way this ad strikes me is that the first annual would be HUGH! (O.K., that's obvious). Is there any other way to view an airplane that hasn't been annualed in over three years as anything besides a project? What would "typical" hull value of such an airplane be? That is, if the purchase price were low enough, it could be considered a good buy if the purchaser were prepared to rebuild it. Do y'all agree? Maybe if the asking price were lowered by 50% this airplane could be considered a possibility for a value-priced rebuild project? (If a pre-buy showed various components, hoses, etc. to be of serviceable condition, some $ could be added back to the purchase price.) TIA for any responses. Kind Regards, David ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Subject: Re: [Q] What's It Really Worth (Ballpark)?
There is no such thing as a $45K twin. Sure, you could buy it at $45, maybe negociate less, but expect to be into it closer to $100K before you fly it to your home aerodrome. $100K may seem a bit over the top, but as you start to find out what it needs and add what you want, I'd be amazed it it was much less. Yes, I'm skeptical, but I've seen this so many times before that I'm pretty confident on those numbers. By the way, if this is the airplane I'm thinking of, saying it needs paint is quite an understatment. On the up side, only 3/4 of it will need to be stripped before repainting. It hasn't flown in 3 years. Are the bladders full of gas? If not, expect to replace some. Have the mixtures been left in idle cut off? If so, expect to overhaul 2 pressure carburetors. Before you start these engines, remove the plugs and pull the prop through (the correct direction, don't back turn it) and get the oil out of the cylinders to avoid hydrostatic lock. In other words, this airplane screams PROJECT! Not that that's a bad thing -- if you want a project. It's a Commander; it deserves to be restored but=20as a wise man already said, "if you have to ask, you can't afford it." Wing Commander Gordon Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com>
Subject: FAA Action
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Tom, Jeremy is my oldest son so I may be a bit biased. I understand the reasons for the rules, and I believe they are necessary, but in this case what was done has nothing to do with those reasons. The flying he was doing with dynamite aboard, was only from one side of the flooded river to the other side. Jeremy never handled it, and the only passenger was the demolition expert, who was also the person handling the dynamite. If there had been another way to get the demo man and his goods across the river they would have used it because it was dark and blustery. There was no other way and if Jeremy hadn't taken them across, they would not have made it across the river. Two homes had already been devoured by the river because the obstruction dam had diverted the river out of it's normal channel and more homes were threatened. This was a last ditch effort to blast the obstruction apart and get the river back into it's channel and would only have been possible from one side of the river, which of course was the other side that couldn't be gotten to other than by air. As far as his equipment is concerned, it a 2003 R44 with about 400 hours TT and it is kept properly maintained. If I had been there and had the skills to do the flying I would have done the same thing. -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tom Fisher Subject: Re: Commander-List: FAA Action --> Kerry, without yet reading the article you do understand that these rules are all to protect the general public. I am a seasoned helicopter pilot with years of IFR medevac experience. I needed to take "dangerous goods transportation" courses throughout my career in order to carry same. Flying dynamite takes knowledge in order to do it safely. I have seen private operators flying from fair to fair in the summer offering tours if the manager of the fair got a cut (did it myself in my youth). Some of these helicopters were flying with time X engines (not mine) allowed in the private sector but not in the commercial sector. In the rescue business one takes precautions in order not to make the situation worse by killing additional people. It's all risky at best. I hope this young lad manages his way through the FAA red tape. I support his actions hoping that he knew everything was as it should be with his equipment and training which will be accepted by the FAA. Tom F ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com> Subject: Commander-List: FAA Action > > Hi everyone, > > I haven't posted here for quite awhile, seems life keeps changing > things and we have to change to keep up. I've been so busy with my > business I Just haven't had much spare time. But we had some things > happening here during the last few weeks I think you may be interested > in. > > We had some record breaking flooding here the week of January 10, many > homes were washed away and completely destroyed, 50 at last count are > either gone or condemned. Anyway, during the flooding my son Jeremy > volunteered his R44 and himself to help out and ended up flying pretty > much non-stop for 4 or 5 days doing everything from rescuing people > caught by the rising water to delivering food to people who were cut > off from town and even ferrying some dynamite and the demolition man > across the river so he could try and clear a debris dam that was > diverting the flood toward some homes. I'm very proud of Jeremy as he > did this all on his dime, and would not accept any compensation from > anyone. He also offered to give tours to anyone who would donate > $100.00 toward helping out one family that had lost everything. He > ended up raising around $20,000.00 that went to them to help them get > back on their feet. > > Well it appears he may have violated some FAR's in doing all this and > a Helio pilot flying a Blackhawk for the state turned him in to the > FAA so they have launched an investigation. > > There's an article about it on AVWEB: > http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archives/avflash/341-full.html#189017 if > you want to read about it. > > It's pretty sad to think our Government officials have so little sense > or ability to look at a situation and determine if it has anything to > do with why a rule was written or not before they take such an action. > Reminds me of the Scribes and Pharoses in the Gospels, they know the > rule book by memory, but don't have a lick of sense. > > KV Electric, INC. > > Kerry Johnson > 1139 North 1210 West > St. George, UT 84770 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom Fisher" <tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca>
Subject: Re: FAA Action
Date: Jan 24, 2005
As I said from the outset I had not even read the article. You should be proud of your son, I would have done the same, it's all risk management. I hope/believe that the ordeal he is about to go through will be primarily paper work and he will come through unscathed. All the best. Tom F. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com> Subject: RE: Commander-List: FAA Action > > Tom, > > Jeremy is my oldest son so I may be a bit biased. I understand the > reasons for the rules, and I believe they are necessary, but in this > case what was done has nothing to do with those reasons. The flying he > was doing with dynamite aboard, was only from one side of the flooded > river to the other side. Jeremy never handled it, and the only passenger > was the demolition expert, who was also the person handling the > dynamite. If there had been another way to get the demo man and his > goods across the river they would have used it because it was dark and > blustery. There was no other way and if Jeremy hadn't taken them across, > they would not have made it across the river. Two homes had already been > devoured by the river because the obstruction dam had diverted the river > out of it's normal channel and more homes were threatened. This was a > last ditch effort to blast the obstruction apart and get the river back > into it's channel and would only have been possible from one side of the > river, which of course was the other side that couldn't be gotten to > other than by air. > > As far as his equipment is concerned, it a 2003 R44 with about 400 hours > TT and it is kept properly maintained. > > If I had been there and had the skills to do the flying I would have > done the same thing. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tom > Fisher > To: commander-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: Commander-List: FAA Action > > > --> > > Kerry, without yet reading the article you do understand that these > rules are all to protect the general public. I am a seasoned helicopter > pilot with years of IFR medevac experience. I needed to take "dangerous > goods transportation" courses throughout my career in order to carry > same. Flying dynamite takes knowledge in order to do it safely. I have > seen private operators flying from fair to fair in the summer offering > tours if the manager of the fair got a cut (did it myself in my youth). > Some of these helicopters were flying with time X engines (not mine) > allowed in the private sector but not in the commercial sector. In the > rescue business one takes precautions in order not to make the situation > worse by killing additional people. It's all risky at best. I hope this > young lad manages his way through the FAA red tape. I support his > actions hoping that he knew everything was as it should be with his > equipment and training which will be accepted by the FAA. > > Tom F > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com> > To: "'Commander Chat'" > Subject: Commander-List: FAA Action > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I haven't posted here for quite awhile, seems life keeps changing > > things and we have to change to keep up. I've been so busy with my > > business I Just haven't had much spare time. But we had some things > > happening here during the last few weeks I think you may be interested > > > in. > > > > We had some record breaking flooding here the week of January 10, many > > > homes were washed away and completely destroyed, 50 at last count are > > either gone or condemned. Anyway, during the flooding my son Jeremy > > volunteered his R44 and himself to help out and ended up flying pretty > > > much non-stop for 4 or 5 days doing everything from rescuing people > > caught by the rising water to delivering food to people who were cut > > off from town and even ferrying some dynamite and the demolition man > > across the river so he could try and clear a debris dam that was > > diverting the flood toward some homes. I'm very proud of Jeremy as he > > did this all on his dime, and would not accept any compensation from > > anyone. He also offered to give tours to anyone who would donate > > $100.00 toward helping out one family that had lost everything. He > > ended up raising around $20,000.00 that went to them to help them get > > back on their feet. > > > > Well it appears he may have violated some FAR's in doing all this and > > a Helio pilot flying a Blackhawk for the state turned him in to the > > FAA so they have launched an investigation. > > > > There's an article about it on AVWEB: > > http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archives/avflash/341-full.html#189017 if > > you want to read about it. > > > > It's pretty sad to think our Government officials have so little sense > > > or ability to look at a situation and determine if it has anything to > > do with why a rule was written or not before they take such an action. > > > Reminds me of the Scribes and Pharoses in the Gospels, they know the > > rule book by memory, but don't have a lick of sense. > > > > KV Electric, INC. > > > > Kerry Johnson > > 1139 North 1210 West > > St. George, UT 84770 > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Subject: Re: FAA Action
In a message dated 24-Jan-05 14:01:10 Pacific Standard Time, kerry(at)kvelectric.com writes: > Jeremy is my oldest son so I may be a bit biased. I am, too, and he's not even related to me. I've looked through Part 91 and aside from Subpart K, the rules Fractional Operators adhere to (this is like FAR 135 in most respects) there is no reference to hazardous material training or permits being mentioned. That's the good news. The bad news is: TITLE 49--TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER I--RESEARCH AND SPECIAL PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PART 175_CARRIAGE BY AIRCRAFT--Table of Contents Subpart A_General Information and Regulations Sec. 175.5 Applicability. (a) This part applies to the acceptance for transportation, loading and transportation of hazardous materials in any aircraft in the United States and in aircraft of United States registry anywhere in air commerce. This part does not apply to: (1) Aircraft owned and operated by a government when not engaged in carrying persons or property for commercial purposes; (2) Aircraft which are not owned by a government nor engaged in carrying persons or property for commercial purposes but which are under the exclusive direction and control of a government for a period of not less than 90 days as specified in a written contract or lease. An aircraft is under the exclusive direction and control of a government when the government exercises responsibility for: (i) Approving crew members and determining that they are qualified to operate the aircraft; (ii) Determining the airworthiness and directing maintenance of the aircraft; and (iii) Dispatching the aircraft, including the times of departure, airports to be used, and type and amount of cargo to be carried; (3) Aircraft of United States registry under lease to and operated by foreign nationals outside the United States if: (i) Hazardous materials forbidden aboard aircraft by Sec. 172.101 of this subchapter are not carried on the aircraft; and (ii) Other hazardous materials are carried in accordance with the regulations of the State (nation) of the aircraft operator. Wing Commander Gordon Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com>
Subject: FAA Action
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Boy, that is as clear as MUD. The way I read that, none of it applies to what Jeremy was doing because he was not involved in any commercial enterprise. There is no written contract between him and the Government agencies etc. So I suppose that means that the Public Service exemption would not apply? The thing about all this is, that this was an emergency and as such any PIC has the authority to circumvent any FAR if he deems it necessary because of the emergency. -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of CloudCraft(at)aol.com Subject: Re: Commander-List: FAA Action In a message dated 24-Jan-05 14:01:10 Pacific Standard Time, kerry(at)kvelectric.com writes: > Jeremy is my oldest son so I may be a bit biased. I am, too, and he's not even related to me. I've looked through Part 91 and aside from Subpart K, the rules Fractional Operators adhere to (this is like FAR 135 in most respects) there is no reference to hazardous material training or permits being mentioned. That's the good news. The bad news is: TITLE 49--TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER I--RESEARCH AND SPECIAL PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PART 175_CARRIAGE BY AIRCRAFT--Table of Contents Subpart A_General Information and Regulations Sec. 175.5 Applicability. (a) This part applies to the acceptance for transportation, loading and transportation of hazardous materials in any aircraft in the United States and in aircraft of United States registry anywhere in air commerce. This part does not apply to: (1) Aircraft owned and operated by a government when not engaged in carrying persons or property for commercial purposes; (2) Aircraft which are not owned by a government nor engaged in carrying persons or property for commercial purposes but which are under the exclusive direction and control of a government for a period of not less than 90 days as specified in a written contract or lease. An aircraft is under the exclusive direction and control of a government when the government exercises responsibility for: (i) Approving crew members and determining that they are qualified to operate the aircraft; (ii) Determining the airworthiness and directing maintenance of the aircraft; and (iii) Dispatching the aircraft, including the times of departure, airports to be used, and type and amount of cargo to be carried; (3) Aircraft of United States registry under lease to and operated by foreign nationals outside the United States if: (i) Hazardous materials forbidden aboard aircraft by Sec. 172.101 of this subchapter are not carried on the aircraft; and (ii) Other hazardous materials are carried in accordance with the regulations of the State (nation) of the aircraft operator. Wing Commander Gordon Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Subject: Re: FAA Action
In a message dated 24-Jan-05 15:16:48 Pacific Standard Time, kerry(at)kvelectric.com writes: > There is no written contract between him and the Government > agencies etc. So I suppose that means that the Public Service exemption > would not apply? > I'll play Devil's Advocate so you can brain storm around the FAA's mentality. My take is that with no public service agreement equal to or longer than 90 days, he can't claim public service so that defense is out. FAR 91.3 ... "(b) In an in-flight emergency requiring immediate action, the pilot incommand may deviate from any rule of this part to the extent requiredto meet that emergency." A disaster is not an in-flight emergency. Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "MASON CHEVAILLIER" <Kamala(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: [Q] What's It Really Worth (Ballpark)?
Date: Jan 24, 2005
CALL ME RE PROJECT PLANE AND ONE SITTING FOR 3 TO 4 YEARS. MASON 817-877-4977 ----- Original Message ----- From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com<mailto:CloudCraft(at)aol.com> To: commander-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 3:57 PM Subject: Re: Commander-List: [Q] What's It Really Worth (Ballpark)? There is no such thing as a $45K twin. Sure, you could buy it at $45, maybe negociate less, but expect to be into it closer to $100K before you fly it to your home aerodrome. $100K may seem a bit over the top, but as you start to find out what it needs and add what you want, I'd be amazed it it was much less. Yes, I'm skeptical, but I've seen this so many times before that I'm pretty confident on those numbers. By the way, if this is the airplane I'm thinking of, saying it needs paint is quite an understatment. On the up side, only 3/4 of it will need to be stripped before repainting. It hasn't flown in 3 years. Are the bladders full of gas? If not, expect to replace some. Have the mixtures been left in idle cut off? If so, expect to overhaul 2 pressure carburetors. Before you start these engines, remove the plugs and pull the prop through (the correct direction, don't back turn it) and get the oil out of the cylinders to avoid hydrostatic lock. In other words, this airplane screams PROJECT! Not that that's a bad thing -- if you want a project. It's a Commander; it deserves to be restored but20as a wise man already said, "if you have to ask, you can't afford it." Wing Commander Gordon Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "MASON CHEVAILLIER" <Kamala(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: [Q] What's It Really Worth (Ballpark)?
Date: Jan 24, 2005
D, GET A GOOD COMMANDER MECHANIC AND HAVE HIM DO A COMPREHENSIVE PREBUY. THEN START TALKING MONEY. MASON ----- Original Message ----- From: dcm@c-sw.com<mailto:dcm@c-sw.com> To: commander-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 2:43 PM Subject: Commander-List: [Q] What's It Really Worth (Ballpark)? Greetings Group, In Trade-A-Plane, I saw the following: "1954 560, S/N 186, SEATS 7, Needs paint. All new glass, New Props (30 hrs), New oil filtration, Dual Narco MK-12D NavComs, HSI. 3400 AFTT, 1260 SMOH. Last annual 11/2001. $45K, CA/(831) 335-2745." The way this ad strikes me is that the first annual would be HUGH! (O.K., that's obvious). Is there any other way to view an airplane that hasn't been annualed in over three years as anything besides a project? What would "typical" hull value of such an airplane be? That is, if the purchase price were low enough, it could be considered a good buy if the purchaser were prepared to rebuild it. Do y'all agree? Maybe if the asking price were lowered by 50% this airplane could be considered a possibility for a value-priced rebuild project? (If a pre-buy showed various components, hoses, etc. to be of serviceable condition, some $ could be added back to the purchase price.) TIA for any responses. Kind Regards, David ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com>
Subject: FAA Action
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Well you Devil you, I think I see what you mean. The FAA position would be that just because peoples lives and property on the ground were in danger, that doesn't constitute an "In Flight Emergency". To which we would say, that flight contrary to FARs was the only way to avert the disaster. And if that scenario doesn't constitute an emergency, what does it constitute as far as the airman present at the "occasion" is concerned? What does the FAA expect the said airman to do? Is he supposed to sit on his thumbs and quote FARs as the people drown and their homes are washed away? This could be a very sticky wicket for the FAA. If they do nothing, they could be in trouble for not following up on a well documented violation. If they punish Jeremy for what he did, all hell will probably break loose on them. I know the media is just waiting and hoping for a story, the County Sheriff, the local Mayors, the Search & Rescue and people in general that know about this are all fired up and spoiling for a fight. I wonder, what's the best way out for all concerned? -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of CloudCraft(at)aol.com Subject: Re: Commander-List: FAA Action In a message dated 24-Jan-05 15:16:48 Pacific Standard Time, kerry(at)kvelectric.com writes: > There is no written contract between him and the Government agencies > etc. So I suppose that means that the Public Service exemption would > not apply? > I'll play Devil's Advocate so you can brain storm around the FAA's mentality. My take is that with no public service agreement equal to or longer than 90 days, he can't claim public service so that defense is out. FAR 91.3 ... "(b) In an in-flight emergency requiring immediate action, the pilot incommand may deviate from any rule of this part to the extent requiredto meet that emergency." A disaster is not an in-flight emergency. Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 25, 2005
From: W J R HAMILTON <wjrhamilton(at)optusnet.com.au>
Subject: Re: FAA Action
Folks, Typical bureaucracy, believe it or not, the FAA for all its faults, is a pillar of virtue compared to some. A little time ago, in an area of severe flooding, with all available aircraft but one, engaged in relief work, a woman on a remote station ( ranch) came into labor, and got into real trouble with a breach birth. The only aircraft available, a C-172, flown by the owner, a PPL and A&P, picked the woman up, and took her to the nearest hospital about 250 nm. Both woman and baby survived, medical evidence at the trial of the pilot was that neither would have lived without getting to hospital. Several weeks after the flight, the grateful father/husband offered an ex-gratia payment to the pilot. CASA got to hear of the payment, and charged the pilot with conducting an illegal commercial operation, ie; without a suitable operating certificate. The pilot was smart enough to elect to have the case heard before a jury, as the charge was a criminal matter. Needless to say, the jury found the miscreant NOT GUILTY. As payback, the maintenance business of the pilot, an A&P ( in Australia a LAME) was hounded by CASA, he was driven out of business and bankrupted. As the former President of AOPA Australia, and Technical Director (still) I have files full of similar vindictive action. The effect of an oppressive regulator in Australia is the reason GA is not so slowly fading away. Regards, Bill Hamilton. At 02:05 25/01/2005, you wrote: > >Hi everyone, > >I haven't posted here for quite awhile, seems life keeps changing things >and we have to change to keep up. I've been so busy with my business I >Just haven't had much spare time. But we had some things happening here >during the last few weeks I think you may be interested in. > >We had some record breaking flooding here the week of January 10, many >homes were washed away and completely destroyed, 50 at last count are >either gone or condemned. Anyway, during the flooding my son Jeremy >volunteered his R44 and himself to help out and ended up flying pretty >much non-stop for 4 or 5 days doing everything from rescuing people >caught by the rising water to delivering food to people who were cut off >from town and even ferrying some dynamite and the demolition man across >the river so he could try and clear a debris dam that was diverting the >flood toward some homes. I'm very proud of Jeremy as he did this all on >his dime, and would not accept any compensation from anyone. He also >offered to give tours to anyone who would donate $100.00 toward helping >out one family that had lost everything. He ended up raising around >$20,000.00 that went to them to help them get back on their feet. > >Well it appears he may have violated some FAR's in doing all this and a >Helio pilot flying a Blackhawk for the state turned him in to the FAA so >they have launched an investigation. > >There's an article about it on AVWEB: >http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archives/avflash/341-full.html#189017 if >you want to read about it. > >It's pretty sad to think our Government officials have so little sense >or ability to look at a situation and determine if it has anything to do >with why a rule was written or not before they take such an action. >Reminds me of the Scribes and Pharoses in the Gospels, they know the >rule book by memory, but don't have a lick of sense. > >KV Electric, INC. > >Kerry Johnson >1139 North 1210 West >St. George, UT 84770 > > CONFIDENTIALITY & PRIVILEGE NOTICE W.J.R.Hamilton,Glenalmond Group Companies,Fighter Flights Internet Services and Warbirds.Net. & . This message is intended for and should only be used by the addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information.If you are not the intended recipient any use distribution,disclosure or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to this communication are not waived or lost by reason of the mistaken delivery to you.If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately to Australia 61 (0)408 876 526 Dolores capitis non fero. Eos do. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: FAA Action
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Aren't the words "...in air commerce" in (a) crucial here? ----- Original Message ----- From: <CloudCraft(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: Commander-List: FAA Action > > In a message dated 24-Jan-05 14:01:10 Pacific Standard Time, > kerry(at)kvelectric.com writes: > > > Jeremy is my oldest son so I may be a bit biased. > > I am, too, and he's not even related to me. > > I've looked through Part 91 and aside from Subpart K, the rules Fractional > Operators adhere to (this is like FAR 135 in most respects) there is no > reference to hazardous material training or permits being mentioned. > > That's the good news. The bad news is: > > > TITLE 49--TRANSPORTATION > > CHAPTER I--RESEARCH AND SPECIAL PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF > TRANSPORTATION > > PART 175_CARRIAGE BY AIRCRAFT--Table of Contents > > Subpart A_General Information and Regulations > > Sec. 175.5 Applicability. > > (a) This part applies to the acceptance for transportation, loading > and transportation of hazardous materials in any aircraft in the United > States and in aircraft of United States registry anywhere in air > commerce. This part does not apply to: > (1) Aircraft owned and operated by a government when not engaged in > carrying persons or property for commercial purposes; > (2) Aircraft which are not owned by a government nor engaged in > carrying persons or property for commercial purposes but which are under > the exclusive direction and control of a government for a period of not > less than 90 days as specified in a written contract or lease. An > aircraft is under the exclusive direction and control of a government > when the government exercises responsibility for: > (i) Approving crew members and determining that they are qualified > to operate the aircraft; > (ii) Determining the airworthiness and directing maintenance of the > aircraft; and > (iii) Dispatching the aircraft, including the times of departure, > airports to be used, and type and amount of cargo to be carried; > (3) Aircraft of United States registry under lease to and operated > by foreign nationals outside the United States if: > (i) Hazardous materials forbidden aboard aircraft by Sec. 172.101 > of this subchapter are not carried on the aircraft; and > (ii) Other hazardous materials are carried in accordance with the > regulations of the State (nation) of the aircraft operator. > > Wing Commander Gordon > > Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ray Mansfield" <hcourier(at)cox.net>
Subject: Hydraulic pump
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Hi, Not sure if I answered the question correctly although I thought I did. I'm talking 1-2 hrs to change a hydraulic pump only, left engine. I talked with the A&P guy today and he said he thought it took him about 1 1/2 hrs to change the one on the plane I fly...he also said it was his first time changing one. (45 minutes to put it back) When removing it from the left engine he said the only thing needing prior removal were the hydraulic lines. However, on the right engine some of the turbo ducting, air filter and other lines had to be removed before one could get at the pump. Love the description of pump removal below. Am going to print it for my A&P. RM ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brock Lorber" <blorber(at)vegasfc.com> Subject: RE: Commander-List: > > Ray: > > I want your A&P! I haven't found anyone who can do anything to the > IO-720s > in less than 1-2 weeks, let alone 1-2 hours! Thank goodness I do my own > oil > changes, or the airplane would never fly! > > Mason: > > The pump and seal are located in the second most fun to work on spot on > the > entire airplane (the first is where the electric fuel pump lives in the > aft > nacelle). Once you move or remove the induction hoses, > fuel/oil/hydraulic/upper deck lines, and air cleaner (if you are working > on > the right engine), the real fun begins. A good set of stubby end > wrenches, > dexterous fingers, a powerful magnet, aspirin, and a fifth of Jack Daniels > are required tools. > > Just bend your arm under the turbo and over the hydraulic pump, and with > the > tips of two fingers, put the wrench on the nuts on the fuel pump side of > the > hydraulic pump. Loosen approximately 1/64th of one thread (you won't be > able to move the wrench any more than that), flip the wrench over, and > reposition on the nut. After two or three cycles, your fingers will get > tired. Don't worry, you will soon drop the wrench (which will slide under > the fuel servo and wedge itself between the bottom of the compartment and > the fuel servo) giving you a much needed break. > > By the way, all four nuts on the hydraulic pump need to be backed off more > or less together, or they will become jam nuts on the case of the > hydraulic > pump. After all four nuts and washers are off the pump and you've fished > them out of the oil in the bottom of the engine compartment, remove the > pump > and replace the seal and gasket. Take time to congratulate yourself at > this > point; you are approximately 10% complete with this project! Replacement > makes removal look like a snap! > > Or...get Ray's A&P to do it! > > Good luck! Trust me, I feel for you. > > Brock - 400CH > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ray > Mansfield > To: commander-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: Commander-List: > > > Don't think there's an easy way. Just had that done to the 680FLP, > IO-720 > I fly by an A&P, took him quite a while. Not sure how long but I think > we're > > talking 1-2 hrs, however I do think it was his first time doing the job. . > > Ray M. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "MASON CHEVAILLIER" <Kamala(at)msn.com> > To: "commander-list" > Subject: Commander-List: > > >> >> >> DOES ANYONE HAVE A EASY ACCESS AND WAY TO CHANGE A GARLOCK SEAL AND >> GASKET > >> AND THE HYDROLIC PUMP ON OFF THE ACCESSORY CASE ON AN IO720 EQUIPED >> 680FP? > >> THANK YOU FOR ANY HELP. MASON N2001M >> >> >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Subject: Re: FAA Action
In a message dated 24-Jan-05 17:33:18 Pacific Standard Time, nico(at)cybersuperstore.com writes: > Aren't the words "...in air commerce" in (a) crucial here? Yes, Nico, but they arrive after the crucial words, "in any aircraft." For about a minute and a half I thought I found The Way Out, but realized that the air commerce reference was to US carriers outside the US (and not subject to US Territory law). As usual, pilots are responsible for knowing all the FARs and any other law that governs aircraft -- such as NTSB rules, HAZMAT rules, FCC rules, etc. Of course, we do this, accepting salaries at a fraction of even the worst of attorneys. Wing Commander Gordon Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Subject: Re: FAA Action
In a message dated 24-Jan-05 16:26:00 Pacific Standard Time, kerry(at)kvelectric.com writes: > I wonder, what's the best way out for all concerned? > To answer your question on logic and ethics, I'll defer to Mr. Hamilton's post from Down Under to illustrate how a government agency can -- and will -- act in the face of the obvious. And since I'm the Devil's Advocate, I'll forecast that the FAA will drop it, or at worst, give Jeremy a letter of Notice of Violation and then not act on it. That covers them, and keeps a bit of sanity running. But do not back down on pulling in every Local, State and Federal official you can. Act as if the FAA is coming and then if nothing happens, you'll have lots of letters of commendation to frame and hang on the walls. Wing Commander Gordon Devil's Advocate Purveyor of Useless Advice Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: FAA Action
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Is that what DA-PUA stands for. ----- Original Message ----- From: <CloudCraft(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: Commander-List: FAA Action > > In a message dated 24-Jan-05 16:26:00 Pacific Standard Time, > kerry(at)kvelectric.com writes: > > > I wonder, what's the best way out for all concerned? > > > > To answer your question on logic and ethics, I'll defer to Mr. Hamilton's > post from Down Under to illustrate how a government agency can -- and will -- act > in the face of the obvious. > > And since I'm the Devil's Advocate, I'll forecast that the FAA will drop it, > or at worst, give Jeremy a letter of Notice of Violation and then not act on > it. That covers them, and keeps a bit of sanity running. > > But do not back down on pulling in every Local, State and Federal official > you can. Act as if the FAA is coming and then if nothing happens, you'll have > lots of letters of commendation to frame and hang on the walls. > > Wing Commander Gordon > Devil's Advocate > Purveyor of Useless Advice > > Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Subject: Re: FAA Action
In a message dated 1/24/2005 2:01:10 PM Pacific Standard Time, kerry(at)kvelectric.com writes: Jeremy is my oldest son so I may be a bit biased. He is a hero in my book. jb ________________________________________________________________________________
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Subject: Re: FAA Action
In a message dated 1/24/2005 6:19:31 PM Pacific Standard Time, CloudCraft(at)aol.com writes: And since I'm the Devil's Advocate, I'll forecast that the FAA will drop it Well, one would hope. I doubt it. The rules the govern our flying have not changed in a wholesale way in the past 2 decades. The people who enforce them have, however changed dramatically. In years past, an FAA "person" would likely be retired from one of maybe even two careers (Millitay/airlaine) and had a wealth of real world knowledge to draw from. Not so today. The young men and women have little of no experience. While the old school thought of themselves as furthering safety and making aviation a better place. The new crowd are simply "sky cops." Media attention will likly make little or no difference. Here is their speech in front of "news 12" "Understand that we also feel a wonderful dead was done, however, the FAA rules are writen to insure safety for everyone. Those on the ground depend on us to make certain the air traffic they see above them wont blow up. We feel strongly that this case needs to be fully prosecuted to insure Bla Bla Bla......." They will through in a sentence or two about 911 and there you have it. Pressure for a higher authority MAY help.(did'nt help the Hoov) Your son needs to wear his violation as a badge of honor. The record only are kept for 5 years. Unless he flies for a living, who cares!! The few, The proud, the Busted!! jb ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brock Lorber - VegasFC" <blorber(at)vegasfc.com>
Subject: FAA Action
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Kerry: It took me all day to realize who this discussion was about. I was lucky enough to ferry Jeremy and his new (to him) Cirrus from Scottsdale to SGU a couple of weeks ago and hate to see him in this position. My take is that everything Jeremy did is worthy of the Presidential medal and the Congressional gold medal (please send all the relevent details and I'll nominate him). There will be no debate about the good deeds he did as long as it was all on his dime. However, the FAA has him on one salient point: the benefit rides require pre-notification. The conversation about public service is irrelevant. There is no emergency situation that would require "scenic rides" and no governmental organization can officially sponsor such flights. If a donation was required to take the flight, he's in violation of the FARs. The sick part of the whole situation is with a single phone call to me, I would have done the benefit flights, on my dime, in his Cirrus (or our Cirrus or our Commander) and been perfectly legal to do so. Jeremy doesn't know me (or other Las Vegas companies I work for) well enough to know that he could have saved alot of money and headaches by using me as a resource, but the unasked question will be his downfall in this situation. Having said that, I agree with Keith that the FAA will offer a letter of violation and the situation will be done with. His biggest worry should not be the FAA, but the insurance company. No insurer will want to get near a pilot that has an FAA violation on his record! For that reason, you should immediately pull every string you have to to avoid a notice of violation. Don't let this get to press or even a formal investigation. The "best way out for all concerned" is for this investigation to get lost in the shuffle! Please let me know if I can help. Brock Lorber N400CH - 680FL(P) N327RH, N578PS, N6053U, N916CD - Cirrus SR22 > > Well you Devil you, I think I see what you mean. The FAA position would > be that just because peoples lives and property on the ground were in > danger, that doesn't constitute an "In Flight Emergency". > > To which we would say, that flight contrary to FARs was the only way to > avert the disaster. And if that scenario doesn't constitute an > emergency, what does it constitute as far as the airman present at the > "occasion" is concerned? What does the FAA expect the said airman to do? > Is he supposed to sit on his thumbs and quote FARs as the people drown > and their homes are washed away? > > This could be a very sticky wicket for the FAA. If they do nothing, they > could be in trouble for not following up on a well documented violation. > If they punish Jeremy for what he did, all hell will probably break > loose on them. I know the media is just waiting and hoping for a story, > the County Sheriff, the local Mayors, the Search & Rescue and people in > general that know about this are all fired up and spoiling for a fight. > I wonder, what's the best way out for all concerned? > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of > CloudCraft(at)aol.com > To: commander-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: Commander-List: FAA Action > > > > In a message dated 24-Jan-05 15:16:48 Pacific Standard Time, > kerry(at)kvelectric.com writes: > > > There is no written contract between him and the Government agencies > > etc. So I suppose that means that the Public Service exemption would > > not apply? > > > > I'll play Devil's Advocate so you can brain storm around the FAA's > mentality. > > My take is that with no public service agreement equal to or longer than > 90 days, he can't claim public service so that defense is out. > > FAR 91.3 > ... "(b) In an in-flight emergency requiring immediate action, the pilot > incommand may deviate from any rule of this part to the extent > requiredto meet that emergency." > > A disaster is not an in-flight emergency. > > Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Addington" <jtaddington(at)charter.net>
Subject: FAA Action
Date: Jan 25, 2005
You have to remember that the 1% of the good FAA people give the other 99% a bad name. Jim A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Fw: Patches the Horse!
Date: Jan 25, 2005
You've got to see this to believe it!................. (Video with sound) http://www.bassfiles.net/PatchestheHorse.wmv ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Fw: POLICE VOICEMAIL
Date: Jan 25, 2005
You need speakers... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Addington" <jtaddington(at)charter.net>
Subject: Fw: Patches the Horse!
Date: Jan 25, 2005
Thanks Nico, I have some friends that keep and own horses that will like this. Jim A -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of nico css Subject: Commander-List: Fw: Patches the Horse! You've got to see this to believe it!................. (Video with sound) http://www.bassfiles.net/PatchestheHorse.wmv ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 25, 2005
Subject: Re: Fw: Patches the Horse!
I, for one, was appalled by the carelessness and abuse Patches received: That horse was not wearing a seat belt. Wing Commander Gordon Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Remember the guy who wanted to blow up an airliner?
Date: Jan 26, 2005
1.67 SARE_ADLTSUB2 Contains possible adult words Remember the guy who got on a plane with a bomb built into his shoe and tried to light it? Did you know his trial is over? Did you know he was sentenced? Did you see/hear any of the judge's comments on TV/Radio? Didn't think so. Everyone should hear what the judge had to say. Ruling by Judge William Young US District Court. Prior to sentencing, the Judge asked the defendant if he had anything to say. His ! response: After admitting his guilt to the court for the record, Reid also admitted his "allegiance to Osama bin Laden, to Islam, and to the religion of Allah," defiantly stated "I think I ought not apologize for my actions," and told the court "I am at war with your country." Judge Young then delivered the statement quoted below, a stinging condemnation of Reid in particular and terrorists in general: January 30, 2003, United States vs. Reid. Judge Young: Mr. Richard C. Reid, hearken now to the sentence the Court imposes upon you. On counts 1, 5 and 6 the Court sentences y! ou to life in prison in the custody of the United States Attorney General. On counts 2, 3, 4 and 7, the Court sentences you to 20 years in prison on each count, the sentence on each count to run consecutive with the other. That's 80 years. On count 8 the Court sentences you to the mandatory 30 years consecutive to the 80 years just imposed. The Court imposes upon you each of the eight counts a fine of $250,000 for the aggregate fine of $2 million. The Court accepts the government's recommendation with respect to restitution and orders restitution in the amount of $298.17 to Andre Bousquet and $5,784 to American Airlines. The Court imposes upon you the $800 special assessment. The Court imposes upon you five years supervised release simply because the law requires it. But the life sentences are real life sentences so I need go no further. This is the sentence that is provided for by our statutes. It is a fair and just sentence. It is a righteous sentence. Let me explain this to you. We are not afraid of you or any of your terrorist coconspirators, Mr. Reid. We are Americans. We have been through the fire before. There is all too much war talk here and I say that to everyone with the utmost respect. Here in this court, where we deal with individuals as individuals and care for individuals as individuals. As human beings, we reach out for justice. You are not an enemy combatant. You are a terrorist. You are not a soldier in any war. You are a terrorist. To give you that reference, to call you a soldier, gives you far too much stature. Whether it is the officers of government who do it or your attorney who does it, or that happens to be your view, you are a terrorist...And we do not negotiate with terrorists. We do not treat with terrorists. We do not sign documents with terrorists. We hunt them down one by one and bring them to justice. So war talk is way out of line in this court. You are a big fellow. But you are not that big. You're no warrior. I know warriors. You are a terrorist. A species of criminal guilty of multiple attempted murders. In a very real sense, State Trooper Santiago had it right when! you first were taken off that plane and into custody and you wondered where the press and where the TV crews were and he said you're no big deal. You're no big deal. What your counsel, what your able counsel and what the equally able United States attorneys have grappled with and what I have as honestly as I know how tried to grapple with, is why you did something so horrific. What was it that led you here to this courtroom today? I have listened respectfully to what you have to say. And I ask you to search your heart and ask yourself what sort of unfathomable hate led you to do what you are guilty and admit you are guilty of doing. And I have an answer for you. It may not satisfy you, but as I search this entire record, it comes as close to understanding as I know. It seems to me you hate the one thing that is most precious. You hate our freedom. Our individual freedom. Our individual freedom to live as we choose, to come and go as we choose, to believe or not believe as we individually choose. Here, in this society, the very winds carry freedom. They carry it everywhere from sea to shining sea. It is because we prize individua! l freedom so much that you are here in this beautiful courtroom. So that everyone can see, truly see, that justice is administered fairly, individually, and discretely. It is for freedom's sake that your lawyers are striving so vigorously on your behalf and have filed appeals, will go on in their representation of you before other judges. We are about it. Because we all know that the way we treat you, Mr. Reid, is the measure of our own liberties. Make no mistake though. It is yet true that we will bare any burden; pay any price, to preserve our freedoms. Look around this courtroom. Mark it well. The world is not going to long remember what you or I say here. Day after tomorrow, it will be forgotten, but this, however, will long endure. Here in this courtroom and courtrooms all ! across America, the American people will gather to see that justice, individual justice, justice, not war, individual justice is in fact being done. The very President of the United States through his officers will have to come into courtrooms and lay out evidence on which specific matters can be judged and juries of citizens will gather to sit and judge that evidence democratically, to mold and shape and refine our sense of justice. See that flag, Mr. Reid? That's the flag of the United States of America. That flag will fly there long after this is all forgotten. That flag stands for freedom. You know it always will. Mr. Custody Officer. Stand him down. So, how much of this Judge's comments did we hear on our TV sets? We need more judges like Judge Young, but that's another subject. Pass this around. Everyone should and needs to hear what this fine judge had to say. Powerful words that strike home. God bless America Pass it on...............................everyone should read this! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 26, 2005
From: Daniel Stewart <dstewart7777(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Anyone need props?
Hey Commanderland. Does anyone have need for a pair of practically new props. They have only 30hours on them. These are the new MV shank props from Hartzell that are direct replacements for the originals. They are 3 bladed, 84 for the spline shaft engines, such as GO480B. Model #: HC-A3MV20-2/MV8433N These were the permanent solution to AD 97-18-02. New ones are $28,870 each I will part with these for much less. If interested, reply directly to me to avoid unnecessary chatter on the commander board. Thanks, Dan --------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: The ultimate tax dollar
Date: Jan 27, 2005
Fuel: $3,000 One flight hour: $20,000 Training to do this: $1,000,000 Having you and I pay for it: priceless. http://raf.union.rpi.edu/downloads/f18_ride.wmv ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 27, 2005
From: Chris Schuermann <cschuerm(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: The ultimate tax dollar
nico css wrote: > http://raf.union.rpi.edu/downloads/f18_ride.wmv Sweet! Should have put a warming on this posting Nico - may cause unexpected reactions in some males.... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Addington" <jtaddington(at)charter.net>
Subject: The ultimate tax dollar
Date: Jan 27, 2005
Nico, That was a goooood one. You might like this one. http://www.check-six.com/Crash_Sites/XF-11_crash_site.htm Jim A -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of nico css Subject: Commander-List: The ultimate tax dollar Fuel: $3,000 One flight hour: $20,000 Training to do this: $1,000,000 Having you and I pay for it: priceless. http://raf.union.rpi.edu/downloads/f18_ride.wmv ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: The ultimate tax dollar
Date: Jan 27, 2005
Thanks, Jim. I put that one in my favorites folder. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Addington" <jtaddington(at)charter.net> Subject: RE: Commander-List: The ultimate tax dollar > > Nico, > > That was a goooood one. You might like this one. > http://www.check-six.com/Crash_Sites/XF-11_crash_site.htm > > Jim A > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of nico css > To: commander-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Commander-List: The ultimate tax dollar > > > > > Fuel: $3,000 > One flight hour: $20,000 > Training to do this: $1,000,000 > Having you and I pay for it: priceless. > > http://raf.union.rpi.edu/downloads/f18_ride.wmv > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: The ultimate tax dollar
Date: Jan 27, 2005
They don't call those reactions airgasms for nothing, you know. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Schuermann" <cschuerm(at)cox.net> Subject: Re: Commander-List: The ultimate tax dollar > > > nico css wrote: > > http://raf.union.rpi.edu/downloads/f18_ride.wmv > > Sweet! > Should have put a warming on this posting Nico - may cause unexpected > reactions in some males.... > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Barry Collman" <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: 680-490-160 N6222D
Date: Jan 27, 2005
Hi JimBob, Amended owner details: Danny C & Debra Schindler 117 Hackberry Trail Forney Texas 75126 Tel: 972 564 9520 (but the last digit is very indistinct) The FAA have this aircraft listed as: registration pending (to Danny Schindler et al) 6950 Sue Ann Lane Terrell Texas 75161-8173 I'm not sure why the FAA show as it is, the Application for Registration showed the Forney address. Go get 'em!! Sincere Best Regards, Barry ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Joann Chevaillier" <kamala(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: 680-490-160 N6222D
Date: Jan 27, 2005
bc, forney and terrell are right next to each other. mason ----- Original Message ----- From: Barry Collman Subject: Commander-List: 680-490-160 N6222D Hi JimBob, Amended owner details: Danny C & Debra Schindler 117 Hackberry Trail Forney Texas 75126 Tel: 972 564 9520 (but the last digit is very indistinct) The FAA have this aircraft listed as: registration pending (to Danny Schindler et al) 6950 Sue Ann Lane Terrell Texas 75161-8173 I'm not sure why the FAA show as it is, the Application for Registration showed the Forney address. Go get 'em!! Sincere Best Regards, Barry ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Joann Chevaillier" <kamala(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: The ultimate tax dollar
Date: Jan 27, 2005
go see all of this in "the aviator" ----- Original Message ----- From: Jim Addington Subject: RE: Commander-List: The ultimate tax dollar Nico, That was a goooood one. You might like this one. http://www.check-six.com/Crash_Sites/XF-11_crash_site.htm Jim A -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of nico css Subject: Commander-List: The ultimate tax dollar Fuel: $3,000 One flight hour: $20,000 Training to do this: $1,000,000 Having you and I pay for it: priceless. http://raf.union.rpi.edu/downloads/f18_ride.wmv ________________________________________________________________________________
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 27, 2005
Subject: Re: 680-490-160 N6222D
THANKS!! JB ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Joann Chevaillier" <kamala(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: 680-490-160 N6222D
Date: Jan 28, 2005
JB, FORNEY AND TERRELL ARE ONLY ABOUT 70 MILES FROM ME, IF I CAN HELP. MASON ----- Original Message ----- From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com Subject: Re: Commander-List: 680-490-160 N6222D THANKS!! JB ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Barry Hancock <radialpower(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Aviator
Date: Jan 28, 2005
On Jan 27, 2005, at 11:55 PM, Commander-List Digest Server wrote: > > > go see all of this in "the aviator" Brings up a sore spot for me. I was supposed to fly for that movie. I was to make a series of low passes for a hi-tech recording system in my CJ-6A with the sound to be used for the H-1 Racer. The day before our recording session some bonehead in a T-28 was doing the same thing and crashed...got behind the power curve making a dirty pass and totaled the airplane. Of course, he walked away. Anyway, I get a call from the producer saying that it had been cancelled because insurance would not cover it. Cost me $2500...not to mention my immortality at the bottom of the movie credits! So, 8 months later I'm flying with a group of 4 other T-28's. At the lunch table one of the guys proudly says, "wanna see the pictures of my crash?" .....Yep, the guy that cost me two and a half grand is now sitting across the table from me bragging about his crash! Nothing like a little salt in the wound! BTW, anyone want a 680E that will be absolutely the most structurally sound bathtub Commander on the market? Morris is half way through replacing the landing gear trusses and motor mounts....as Morris would say, "the stack of $100 bills is shrinking." Barry ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "tylor.hall" <tylor.hall(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Aviator
Date: Jan 28, 2005
HI Barry, I loved the sound when I flew with you. How much do you want for your 680E? Where did you get the parts for the trusses? Did you take photos of the process to replace them? Tylor Hall On Jan 27, 2005, at 11:55 PM, Commander-List Digest Server wrote: > > > go see all of this in "the aviator" Brings up a sore spot for me. I was supposed to fly for that movie. I was to make a series of low passes for a hi-tech recording system in my CJ-6A with the sound to be used for the H-1 Racer. The day before our recording session some bonehead in a T-28 was doing the same thing and crashed...got behind the power curve making a dirty pass and totaled the airplane. Of course, he walked away. Anyway, I get a call from the producer saying that it had been cancelled because insurance would not cover it. Cost me $2500...not to mention my immortality at the bottom of the movie credits! So, 8 months later I'm flying with a group of 4 other T-28's. At the lunch table one of the guys proudly says, "wanna see the pictures of my crash?" .....Yep, the guy that cost me two and a half grand is now sitting across the table from me bragging about his crash! Nothing like a little salt in the wound! BTW, anyone want a 680E that will be absolutely the most structurally sound bathtub Commander on the market? Morris is half way through replacing the landing gear trusses and motor mounts....as Morris would say, "the stack of $100 bills is shrinking." Barry ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Lowell Girod" <dongirod(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Aviator
Date: Jan 28, 2005
Take heart Barry, nobody sticks around and reads the credits! Don ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 29, 2005
From: Daniel Stewart <dstewart7777(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Propellers for sale.
Hi Jb Yes, i do have a plane. If not sold in 1 month, I will part her out. It will be a sad day. Its a complete 560, engines running at high compression, but at TBO. Everything on the plane works, Plane still flies. Props have 30 hours since new. What do you need? I also have 11 fresh cylinders assemblies for her, will sell for $800 each. I have a roboTow bar for $500, hardly used. Also I have 6 original prop blades for her taged "servicable" and suitable for the MV modification. 2 prop hubs in uncertian state, but appear to be very good. Make me a list of what you're looking for and an offer for each. Dan Looks like you have a 560 to sell here too...are you selling parts off it? if so I would be interested in quite a few parts, let me know what other parts you may have for sale. Thanx Jb. --------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <dfalik(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Propellers for sale.
Date: Jan 29, 2005
Will the roboTow bar work on a 500 shrike? If so I have a strong interest in it. Don -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Stewart Subject: Commander-List: Re: Propellers for sale. Hi Jb Yes, i do have a plane. If not sold in 1 month, I will part her out. It will be a sad day. Its a complete 560, engines running at high compression, but at TBO. Everything on the plane works, Plane still flies. Props have 30 hours since new. What do you need? I also have 11 fresh cylinders assemblies for her, will sell for $800 each. I have a roboTow bar for $500, hardly used. Also I have 6 original prop blades for her taged "servicable" and suitable for the MV modification. 2 prop hubs in uncertian state, but appear to be very good. Make me a list of what you're looking for and an offer for each. Dan Looks like you have a 560 to sell here too...are you selling parts off it? if so I would be interested in quite a few parts, let me know what other parts you may have for sale. Thanx Jb. --------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Barry Hancock <radialpower(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Commander-List Digest: 4 Msgs - 01/28/05
Date: Jan 29, 2005
On Jan 28, 2005, at 11:55 PM, Commander-List Digest Server wrote: > Take heart Barry, nobody sticks around and reads the credits! > > Don LOL! Yeah, but *I* would have! :) Tylor, contact me off list...Morris has been taking pictures. We've had the trusses manufactured... When all the work is done and it's painted I'll take $135K for it, right now you can buy it at a discount.... B ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: Aviator
Date: Jan 29, 2005
That's comforting. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lowell Girod" <dongirod(at)earthlink.net> Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Aviator > > Take heart Barry, nobody sticks around and reads the credits! > > Don > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "steve" <steveg(at)nternet.com>
Subject: Re: Aviator
Date: Jan 30, 2005
I hope I am addressing the list properly via this reply. Please advise of other methods if I am wrong here. Just wanted to introduce myself Steve Gilson and partner Rob Munro. We just purchased and flew home from St. Louis to L31 St. Tammany Aero Commander 500 N6291B. Our first. I also own an A35 Bonanza while Rob has a 1964 MC Mooney. We will greatly appreciate everyones knowledge as we continue to fall in love with the new lady. On a different matter, I am looking for a 720 Commander, N401E, serial #720-650-6 which disappeared off my radar screen a few years back. My father has some history with her and I was hoping to get some current information for him. He is getting up there and would appreciate any stories and whereabouts. If still within our radius and time I would love to fly him out to see his old friend. Steve G and Rob M -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Lowell Girod Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Aviator Take heart Barry, nobody sticks around and reads the credits! Don ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bobby Sather" <sather(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Aviator
Date: Jan 30, 2005
This is what I found: N-number : N401E Aircraft Serial Number : 720-650-6 Aircraft Manufacturer : AERO COMMANDER Model : 720 Engine Manufacturer : LYCOMING Model : GSO&IGSO-480 Aircraft Year : 1959 Owner Name : JOYCE JACK Owner Address : PO BOX 571 AMELIA, LA, 70340 Type of Owner : Partnership Registration Date : 06-Aug-1981 Airworthiness Certificate Type : Standard -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of steve Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Aviator I hope I am addressing the list properly via this reply. Please advise of other methods if I am wrong here. Just wanted to introduce myself Steve Gilson and partner Rob Munro. We just purchased and flew home from St. Louis to L31 St. Tammany Aero Commander 500 N6291B. Our first. I also own an A35 Bonanza while Rob has a 1964 MC Mooney. We will greatly appreciate everyones knowledge as we continue to fall in love with the new lady. On a different matter, I am looking for a 720 Commander, N401E, serial #720-650-6 which disappeared off my radar screen a few years back. My father has some history with her and I was hoping to get some current information for him. He is getting up there and would appreciate any stories and whereabouts. If still within our radius and time I would love to fly him out to see his old friend. Steve G and Rob M -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Lowell Girod Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Aviator Take heart Barry, nobody sticks around and reads the credits! Don ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "steve" <steveg(at)nternet.com>
Subject: Re: Aviator
Date: Jan 30, 2005
Thanks, I am aware of this registration, but the bird disappears after this. Nothing comes up in my searches. Steve G -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bobby Sather Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Aviator This is what I found: N-number : N401E Aircraft Serial Number : 720-650-6 Aircraft Manufacturer : AERO COMMANDER Model : 720 Engine Manufacturer : LYCOMING Model : GSO&IGSO-480 Aircraft Year : 1959 Owner Name : JOYCE JACK Owner Address : PO BOX 571 AMELIA, LA, 70340 Type of Owner : Partnership Registration Date : 06-Aug-1981 Airworthiness Certificate Type : Standard -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of steve Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Aviator I hope I am addressing the list properly via this reply. Please advise of other methods if I am wrong here. Just wanted to introduce myself Steve Gilson and partner Rob Munro. We just purchased and flew home from St. Louis to L31 St. Tammany Aero Commander 500 N6291B. Our first. I also own an A35 Bonanza while Rob has a 1964 MC Mooney. We will greatly appreciate everyones knowledge as we continue to fall in love with the new lady. On a different matter, I am looking for a 720 Commander, N401E, serial #720-650-6 which disappeared off my radar screen a few years back. My father has some history with her and I was hoping to get some current information for him. He is getting up there and would appreciate any stories and whereabouts. If still within our radius and time I would love to fly him out to see his old friend. Steve G and Rob M -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Lowell Girod Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Aviator Take heart Barry, nobody sticks around and reads the credits! Don ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Barry Collman" <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Aviator
Date: Jan 30, 2005
Hi Steve, Thanks for introducing yourself, and I hope you get many happy hours flying your Model 500. The Model 720 you're looking for is indeed registered to Jack Joyce and Robert Munro, of Amelia, Louisiana. They purchased it on April 10th 1981. But, the last I knew, it was with Desert Aircraft Salvage, Artesia,New Mexico and that report was back in September 1995. I'm presently in the process of building myself a new PC workstation, so resources are somewhat limited right now. Also in a week or so, I should be getting a new PC. But, if you remind me in a few week's time, I'll send you the history of both the Model 720 and your Model 500 (s/n 683). Very Best Regards, Barry Collman (Aero Commander historian) ----- Original Message ----- From: "steve" <steveg(at)nternet.com> Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Aviator | | I hope I am addressing the list properly via this reply. Please advise of | other methods if I am wrong here. | | Just wanted to introduce myself Steve Gilson and partner Rob Munro. We just | purchased and flew home from St. Louis to L31 St. Tammany Aero Commander 500 | N6291B. Our first. I also own an A35 Bonanza while Rob has a 1964 MC | Mooney. We will greatly appreciate everyones knowledge as we continue to | fall in love with the new lady. | | On a different matter, I am looking for a 720 Commander, N401E, serial | #720-650-6 which disappeared off my radar screen a few years back. My | father has some history with her and I was hoping to get some current | information for him. He is getting up there and would appreciate any | stories and whereabouts. If still within our radius and time I would love | to fly him out to see his old friend. | | Steve G and Rob M | | -----Original Message----- | From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com | [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Lowell Girod | To: commander-list(at)matronics.com | Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Aviator | | | | Take heart Barry, nobody sticks around and reads the credits! | | Don | | | | | | | ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "tylor.hall" <tylor.hall(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Aviator
Date: Jan 30, 2005
A Google search came up with this phone number. Artiesia is 239 miles south of ABQ, so it is a little ways from me. Artiesia is 40 miles south of Roswell, NM. A phone call will tell you if the aircraft is still there and what is left of it. Desert Aircraft Salvage 5401 West Richardson Avenue, Artesia, NM 88210 (505) 748-2107 Tylor Hall Hi Steve, Thanks for introducing yourself, and I hope you get many happy hours flying your Model 500. The Model 720 you're looking for is indeed registered to Jack Joyce and Robert Munro, of Amelia, Louisiana. They purchased it on April 10th 1981. But, the last I knew, it was with Desert Aircraft Salvage, Artesia,New Mexico and that report was back in September 1995. I'm presently in the process of building myself a new PC workstation, so resources are somewhat limited right now. Also in a week or so, I should be getting a new PC. But, if you remind me in a few week's time, I'll send you the history of both the Model 720 and your Model 500 (s/n 683). Very Best Regards, Barry Collman (Aero Commander historian) ----- Original Message ----- From: "steve" <steveg(at)nternet.com> Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Aviator | | I hope I am addressing the list properly via this reply. Please advise of | other methods if I am wrong here. | | Just wanted to introduce myself Steve Gilson and partner Rob Munro. We just | purchased and flew home from St. Louis to L31 St. Tammany Aero Commander 500 | N6291B. Our first. I also own an A35 Bonanza while Rob has a 1964 MC | Mooney. We will greatly appreciate everyones knowledge as we continue to | fall in love with the new lady. | | On a different matter, I am looking for a 720 Commander, N401E, serial | #720-650-6 which disappeared off my radar screen a few years back. My | father has some history with her and I was hoping to get some current | information for him. He is getting up there and would appreciate any | stories and whereabouts. If still within our radius and time I would love | to fly him out to see his old friend. | | Steve G and Rob M | | -----Original Message----- | From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com | [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Lowell Girod | To: commander-list(at)matronics.com | Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Aviator | | | | Take heart Barry, nobody sticks around and reads the credits! | | Don | | | | | | | ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "alh1(at)juno.com" <alh1(at)juno.com>
Date: Jan 31, 2005
Subject: RE: Commander- 6291B
STEVE, I HAVE 628AH, FORMERLY 6287B. IF YOU NEED ANY HELP WITH THE 500 CALL JIM SCHILLER AT 561-262-8155. HE IS ONE OF THE BEST AS HE HAS BEEN WORKING ON 500'S FOR ABOUT 30 YEARS. FOR INFORMATION ON THE COMMANDER, THIS LIST IS THE BEST. IF THEY DO NOT KNOW IT, YOU DON'T NEED TO KNOW. THERE ARE A COUPLE OF DIFFERENCES ON THE 500 THAT ARE NOT THE SAME AS THE OTHERS SUCH AS THE CARB HEAT BOX. IF THAT IS NOT ADJUSTED RIGHT YOU WILL HAVE A SIMULATED ENGINE FAILURE. (PULL THE CARB HEAT LEVER). ON ALL OLD COMMANDERS, INSPECT THE RUDDER PEDAL TO CABLE CONNECTION AS IT IS ALMOST WORN OUT. WE HAD TWO INFLIGHT FAILURES BEFOREE WE FIXED THEM ALL. JIM CAN GIVE YOU SOME OTHERS. WE ARE AT LANTANA FLORIIDA (LNA) NEAR PALM BEACH. COME BY ANYTIME AND LET'S TALK ABOUT THE 500. ALLAN HOFFMAN Now includes pop-up blocker! Only $14.95/month -visit http://www.juno.com/surf to sign up today! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "steve" <steveg(at)nternet.com>
message body is 75-100% uppercase
Date: Jan 31, 2005
Allan, Wow! Thanks a lot for the heads up. Rob and I plan on as many trips as possible starting next week and will call if we get your way. Steve G -----Original Message-----
From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com
[mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of alh1(at)juno.com body is 75-100% uppercase STEVE, I HAVE 628AH, FORMERLY 6287B. IF YOU NEED ANY HELP WITH THE 500 CALL JIM SCHILLER AT 561-262-8155. HE IS ONE OF THE BEST AS HE HAS BEEN WORKING ON 500'S FOR ABOUT 30 YEARS. FOR INFORMATION ON THE COMMANDER, THIS LIST IS THE BEST. IF THEY DO NOT KNOW IT, YOU DON'T NEED TO KNOW. THERE ARE A COUPLE OF DIFFERENCES ON THE 500 THAT ARE NOT THE SAME AS THE OTHERS SUCH AS THE CARB HEAT BOX. IF THAT IS NOT ADJUSTED RIGHT YOU WILL HAVE A SIMULATED ENGINE FAILURE. (PULL THE CARB HEAT LEVER). ON ALL OLD COMMANDERS, INSPECT THE RUDDER PEDAL TO CABLE CONNECTION AS IT IS ALMOST WORN OUT. WE HAD TWO INFLIGHT FAILURES BEFOREE WE FIXED THEM ALL. JIM CAN GIVE YOU SOME OTHERS. WE ARE AT LANTANA FLORIIDA (LNA) NEAR PALM BEACH. COME BY ANYTIME AND LET'S TALK ABOUT THE 500. ALLAN HOFFMAN Now includes pop-up blocker! Only $14.95/month -visit http://www.juno.com/surf to sign up today! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Wokral" <l.wokral(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Seat Belts
Date: Jan 31, 2005
My 500B presently only has lap belts all around. I would like to install shoulder harnesses for the pilot and copilot seats. Is there an approved modification for this, and where would I find a vendor? Has anyone installed inertial reel split shoulder harnesses? If so, same question. Thanks, Larry Wokral ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "James Rodriguez Colom" <jamesrodriguez(at)bppr.com>
Date: Jan 31, 2005
Subject: Seat Belts
Larry, BAS has what you need. Their belts can be installed on a field-approval basis. Look for their ad in Trade-a-Plane. Let us know if you do it. Jimmy N107VC -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Larry Wokral Subject: Commander-List: Seat Belts My 500B presently only has lap belts all around. I would like to install shoulder harnesses for the pilot and copilot seats. Is there an approved modification for this, and where would I find a vendor? Has anyone installed inertial reel split shoulder harnesses? If so, same question. Thanks, Larry Wokral CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This communication and any attachments hereto contain information that may be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. The information is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the employee or agent entrusted with the responsibility of delivering the message to the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying or distribution of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please delete or destroy all copies and notify the sender immediately. In addition, although precautions have been taken to ensure that the data included herein is free from viruses or other malicious content, we cannot assure that such is indeed the case and disclaim any responsibility attributable thereto. AVISO DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD: Este documento, y cualquier anejo incluido, contienen informacin que podra considerarse privilegiada, confidencial y exenta de divulgacin bajo las leyes aplicables. La informacin es para el uso exclusivo del individuo o entidad a quien est dirigida. Si usted no es el destinatario, el empleado o el agente a quien se le confi la responsabilidad de hacer llegar el mensaje al destinatario, debe percatarse que la divulgacin, copia o distribucin de esta transmisin est estrictamente prohibida. Si ha recibido esta comunicacin por error, favor de borrarla o destruir todas las copias y notificar al remitente inmediatamente. Adems, aunque se hayan tomado precauciones para asegurar que los datos que aqu se incluyen estn libre de virus u otro contenido malintencionado, no podemos asegurar que as sea y, por lo tanto, no nos hacemos responsables de cualquier dao atribuible al caso. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Bow" <bowing74(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Aviator
Date: Jan 31, 2005
Where is L31 St. Tammany? bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: "steve" <steveg(at)nternet.com> Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Aviator > > I hope I am addressing the list properly via this reply. Please advise of > other methods if I am wrong here. > > Just wanted to introduce myself Steve Gilson and partner Rob Munro. We > just > purchased and flew home from St. Louis to L31 St. Tammany Aero Commander > 500 > N6291B. Our first. I also own an A35 Bonanza while Rob has a 1964 MC > Mooney. We will greatly appreciate everyones knowledge as we continue to > fall in love with the new lady. > > On a different matter, I am looking for a 720 Commander, N401E, serial > #720-650-6 which disappeared off my radar screen a few years back. My > father has some history with her and I was hoping to get some current > information for him. He is getting up there and would appreciate any > stories and whereabouts. If still within our radius and time I would love > to fly him out to see his old friend. > > Steve G and Rob M > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Lowell > Girod > To: commander-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Aviator > > > > Take heart Barry, nobody sticks around and reads the credits! > > Don > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Aviator
Date: Jan 31, 2005
From: "Alan Kucheck" <Alan.Kucheck(at)borland.com>
Covington, LA http://www.airnav.com/airport/L31 ak -----Original Message----- From: Bill Bow [mailto:bowing74(at)earthlink.net] Subject: Re: Commander-List: Re: Aviator Where is L31 St. Tammany? bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: "steve" <steveg(at)nternet.com> Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Aviator > > I hope I am addressing the list properly via this reply. Please advise of > other methods if I am wrong here. > > Just wanted to introduce myself Steve Gilson and partner Rob Munro. We > just > purchased and flew home from St. Louis to L31 St. Tammany Aero Commander > 500 > N6291B. Our first. I also own an A35 Bonanza while Rob has a 1964 MC > Mooney. We will greatly appreciate everyones knowledge as we continue to > fall in love with the new lady. > > On a different matter, I am looking for a 720 Commander, N401E, serial > #720-650-6 which disappeared off my radar screen a few years back. My > father has some history with her and I was hoping to get some current > information for him. He is getting up there and would appreciate any > stories and whereabouts. If still within our radius and time I would love > to fly him out to see his old friend. > > Steve G and Rob M > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Lowell > Girod > To: commander-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Aviator > > > > Take heart Barry, nobody sticks around and reads the credits! > > Don > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Addington" <jtaddington(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Aviator
Date: Jan 31, 2005
Bilbo, Go to airnav.com. It will give all information on the airport including fuel prices for a 50 mile radius. Jim A -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Bill Bow Subject: Re: Commander-List: Re: Aviator Where is L31 St. Tammany? bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: "steve" <steveg(at)nternet.com> Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Aviator > > I hope I am addressing the list properly via this reply. Please advise of > other methods if I am wrong here. > > Just wanted to introduce myself Steve Gilson and partner Rob Munro. We > just > purchased and flew home from St. Louis to L31 St. Tammany Aero Commander > 500 > N6291B. Our first. I also own an A35 Bonanza while Rob has a 1964 MC > Mooney. We will greatly appreciate everyones knowledge as we continue to > fall in love with the new lady. > > On a different matter, I am looking for a 720 Commander, N401E, serial > #720-650-6 which disappeared off my radar screen a few years back. My > father has some history with her and I was hoping to get some current > information for him. He is getting up there and would appreciate any > stories and whereabouts. If still within our radius and time I would love > to fly him out to see his old friend. > > Steve G and Rob M > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Lowell > Girod > To: commander-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RE: Commander-List: Re: Aviator > > > > Take heart Barry, nobody sticks around and reads the credits! > > Don > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jody Pillatzki" <Jpillatzki(at)702com.net>
Subject:
Date: Jan 31, 2005
Guys I need a bracket that goes around the augmenter tube on a 520 commander. Anyone have a good one for sale or know of a source for new ones. Jpillatzki at 702com.net. Jody Pillatzki 411VV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Dettmer, AIA" <rcdettmer(at)charter.net>
Subject: Commander Covers
Date: Jan 31, 2005
Hello Commanderland I am looking for a solution to preventing rain water from seeping into my 680F. Since I do not have the luxury of a hangar to protect my cherished Commander, I am wondering if anyone has had any sucess with covers. I remember that Dennis Poletti (hope I spelled that right...) had a cover for his Commander that covered the fuselage. Do they work..?? Morris has worked hard to seal windows during annual inspections, but the rain just keeps coming in and soaking the carpet. If anybody has any insight to this situation, I would appreciate hearing from you. Thanks for your help. Wet in San Luis Obispo, CA... Randy Dettmer 680F/N6253X ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: Commander Covers
Date: Jan 31, 2005
Randy, I don't know how well Dennis Polito's cover worked. You can reach him at 650-595-3949 if you want to bend his ear. Is it for certain the windows? After years of trying to seal my windows, the culprit turned out to be an antenna; the water would leak in the overhead, then run towards the front and down the pilot door, making it look as if the pilot door seal were no good. We fixed it and hopefully it'll hold up with the new interior. Incidentally, Jimbob is in MO right NOW, picking up the airplane, woohoo! He's leaving from there at oh-dark-hundred tomorrow morning and will hopefully have the airplane back here by tomorrow evening. When it gets back I'll take some pix and post a link. Cheers, /John ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Dettmer, AIA" <rcdettmer(at)charter.net> Subject: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > Hello Commanderland > I am looking for a solution to preventing rain water from seeping into my > 680F. Since I do not have the luxury of a hangar to protect my cherished > Commander, I am wondering if anyone has had any sucess with covers. I > remember that Dennis Poletti (hope I spelled that right...) had a cover for > his Commander that covered the fuselage. Do they work..?? Morris has > worked hard to seal windows during annual inspections, but the rain just > keeps coming in and soaking the carpet. > > If anybody has any insight to this situation, I would appreciate hearing > from you. Thanks for your help. > > Wet in San Luis Obispo, CA... > > Randy Dettmer > 680F/N6253X > > > __________ NOD32 1.988 (20050131) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > > __________ NOD32 1.988 (20050131) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom Fisher" <tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca>
Subject: Re: Commander Covers
Date: Jan 31, 2005
Wing to fuselage is where my 500B leaked. I sign for my 680FLP Mr. RPM tomorrow, I'm so excited I can hardly contain myself. Tom F. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Dettmer, AIA" <rcdettmer(at)charter.net> Subject: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > Hello Commanderland > I am looking for a solution to preventing rain water from seeping into my > 680F. Since I do not have the luxury of a hangar to protect my cherished > Commander, I am wondering if anyone has had any sucess with covers. I > remember that Dennis Poletti (hope I spelled that right...) had a cover for > his Commander that covered the fuselage. Do they work..?? Morris has > worked hard to seal windows during annual inspections, but the rain just > keeps coming in and soaking the carpet. > > If anybody has any insight to this situation, I would appreciate hearing > from you. Thanks for your help. > > Wet in San Luis Obispo, CA... > > Randy Dettmer > 680F/N6253X > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: Commander Covers
Date: Jan 31, 2005
I remember having had the same problem with my 500. The water would appear to drip from behind the overhead console. It wasn't much but enough to be irritating. At one time I contemplated removing and resealing the windshield, but I had to sell her to emigrate to the US so it was never done. The covers I had made patch-covered only the windows, so I wasn't expecting any water protection from that. Just a piece of worthless information. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Dettmer, AIA" <rcdettmer(at)charter.net> Subject: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > Hello Commanderland > I am looking for a solution to preventing rain water from seeping into my > 680F. Since I do not have the luxury of a hangar to protect my cherished > Commander, I am wondering if anyone has had any sucess with covers. I > remember that Dennis Poletti (hope I spelled that right...) had a cover for > his Commander that covered the fuselage. Do they work..?? Morris has > worked hard to seal windows during annual inspections, but the rain just > keeps coming in and soaking the carpet. > > If anybody has any insight to this situation, I would appreciate hearing > from you. Thanks for your help. > > Wet in San Luis Obispo, CA... > > Randy Dettmer > 680F/N6253X > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: Commander Covers
Date: Jan 31, 2005
Tom, AWESOME!!! Let us know how you like it! /J ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Fisher" <tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca> Subject: Re: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > Wing to fuselage is where my 500B leaked. > I sign for my 680FLP Mr. RPM tomorrow, I'm so excited I can hardly contain > myself. > Tom F. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Randy Dettmer, AIA" <rcdettmer(at)charter.net> > To: "Commander Chat" > Subject: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > > > > > > Hello Commanderland > > I am looking for a solution to preventing rain water from seeping into my > > 680F. Since I do not have the luxury of a hangar to protect my cherished > > Commander, I am wondering if anyone has had any sucess with covers. I > > remember that Dennis Poletti (hope I spelled that right...) had a cover > for > > his Commander that covered the fuselage. Do they work..?? Morris has > > worked hard to seal windows during annual inspections, but the rain just > > keeps coming in and soaking the carpet. > > > > If anybody has any insight to this situation, I would appreciate hearing > > from you. Thanks for your help. > > > > Wet in San Luis Obispo, CA... > > > > Randy Dettmer > > 680F/N6253X > > > > > > > __________ NOD32 1.988 (20050131) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > > __________ NOD32 1.988 (20050131) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 31, 2005
Subject: Re: Commander Covers
In a message dated 31-Jan-05 18:44:13 Pacific Standard Time, tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca writes: > I sign for my 680FLP Mr. RPM tomorrow, I'm so excited I can hardly contain > myself. Tom! That's great news. Which one are you buying? Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Lowell Girod" <dongirod(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Commander Covers
Date: Jan 31, 2005
Randy; I have a cover for my 560E, got it from Bruce's Covers at Sun & Fun last year. I never had too much of a problem with leaks but was concerned about the new windshields, however this one goes from just ahead of the windshield to over the leading edges. It hooks over the wings to the flaps and two straps under the fuselage. So far I am pleased, I will send you a picture direct if you are interested. I also have trouble finding a hanger, seems like most hangers where I keep my Commander have forty or fifty foot doors. Don > [Original Message] > From: Randy Dettmer, AIA <rcdettmer(at)charter.net> > To: Commander Chat > Date: 1/31/2005 9:32:12 PM > Subject: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > > Hello Commanderland > I am looking for a solution to preventing rain water from seeping into my > 680F. Since I do not have the luxury of a hangar to protect my cherished > Commander, I am wondering if anyone has had any sucess with covers. I > remember that Dennis Poletti (hope I spelled that right...) had a cover for > his Commander that covered the fuselage. Do they work..?? Morris has > worked hard to seal windows during annual inspections, but the rain just > keeps coming in and soaking the carpet. > > If anybody has any insight to this situation, I would appreciate hearing > from you. Thanks for your help. > > Wet in San Luis Obispo, CA... > > Randy Dettmer > 680F/N6253X > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom Fisher" <tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca>
Subject: Re: Commander Covers
Date: Jan 31, 2005
After I sign I will tell all. Tom F. ----- Original Message ----- From: <CloudCraft(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > In a message dated 31-Jan-05 18:44:13 Pacific Standard Time, > tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca writes: > > > I sign for my 680FLP Mr. RPM tomorrow, I'm so excited I can hardly contain > > myself. > > Tom! > > That's great news. Which one are you buying? > > Wing Commander Gordon > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: Commander Covers
Date: Jan 31, 2005
Randy et. al., http://www.aircraftcovers.com/techsheets/ac500.html Looks like a pretty good set of options, and at roughly $800 it might be a good investment... Great, thanks guys. With a new interior & windshield to protect, now you've got me thinking maybe I should get one too. When will I be done spending money on this thing? (that's a rhetorical question, I already know the answer) /J ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lowell Girod" <dongirod(at)earthlink.net> Subject: RE: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > Randy; > > I have a cover for my 560E, got it from Bruce's Covers at Sun & Fun last > year. I never had too much of a problem with leaks but was concerned about > the new windshields, however this one goes from just ahead of the > windshield to over the leading edges. It hooks over the wings to the flaps > and two straps under the fuselage. So far I am pleased, I will send you a > picture direct if you are interested. I also have trouble finding a > hanger, seems like most hangers where I keep my Commander have forty or > fifty foot doors. > > Don > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Randy Dettmer, AIA <rcdettmer(at)charter.net> > > To: Commander Chat > > Date: 1/31/2005 9:32:12 PM > > Subject: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > > > > > > Hello Commanderland > > I am looking for a solution to preventing rain water from seeping into my > > 680F. Since I do not have the luxury of a hangar to protect my cherished > > Commander, I am wondering if anyone has had any sucess with covers. I > > remember that Dennis Poletti (hope I spelled that right...) had a cover > for > > his Commander that covered the fuselage. Do they work..?? Morris has > > worked hard to seal windows during annual inspections, but the rain just > > keeps coming in and soaking the carpet. > > > > If anybody has any insight to this situation, I would appreciate hearing > > from you. Thanks for your help. > > > > Wet in San Luis Obispo, CA... > > > > Randy Dettmer > > 680F/N6253X > > > > > > > __________ NOD32 1.988 (20050131) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > > __________ NOD32 1.988 (20050131) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: Commander Covers
Date: Jan 31, 2005
Randy, One good thing, if the Bruce's cover is a good one.....they're here in Sunnyvale, about a 5 min. drive from PAO! /J ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lowell Girod" <dongirod(at)earthlink.net> Subject: RE: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > Randy; > > I have a cover for my 560E, got it from Bruce's Covers at Sun & Fun last > year. I never had too much of a problem with leaks but was concerned about > the new windshields, however this one goes from just ahead of the > windshield to over the leading edges. It hooks over the wings to the flaps > and two straps under the fuselage. So far I am pleased, I will send you a > picture direct if you are interested. I also have trouble finding a > hanger, seems like most hangers where I keep my Commander have forty or > fifty foot doors. > > Don > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Randy Dettmer, AIA <rcdettmer(at)charter.net> > > To: Commander Chat > > Date: 1/31/2005 9:32:12 PM > > Subject: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > > > > > > Hello Commanderland > > I am looking for a solution to preventing rain water from seeping into my > > 680F. Since I do not have the luxury of a hangar to protect my cherished > > Commander, I am wondering if anyone has had any sucess with covers. I > > remember that Dennis Poletti (hope I spelled that right...) had a cover > for > > his Commander that covered the fuselage. Do they work..?? Morris has > > worked hard to seal windows during annual inspections, but the rain just > > keeps coming in and soaking the carpet. > > > > If anybody has any insight to this situation, I would appreciate hearing > > from you. Thanks for your help. > > > > Wet in San Luis Obispo, CA... > > > > Randy Dettmer > > 680F/N6253X > > > > > > > __________ NOD32 1.988 (20050131) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > > __________ NOD32 1.988 (20050131) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Alan Kucheck" <akucheck(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: New Engine Monitor in Colemill 500A
Date: Feb 01, 2005
My mechanic, Fred Holstein, and his son Jeff recently completed the installation of a JPI engine monitor for me in N811D. The link below shows the graph of a flight last weekend. Tought the group might find it interesting... http://www.kucheck.net/Aircraft/Engine%20Monitor%20Data%20for%202005%2001%20 23.html ak -- Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Barry Collman" <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Commander Covers
Date: Feb 01, 2005
Hi Randy, Just a thought, but have you made sure the sun roof is closed! ? ! BC ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Dettmer, AIA" <rcdettmer(at)charter.net> Subject: Commander-List: Commander Covers | | Hello Commanderland | I am looking for a solution to preventing rain water from seeping into my | 680F. Since I do not have the luxury of a hangar to protect my cherished | Commander, I am wondering if anyone has had any sucess with covers. I | remember that Dennis Poletti (hope I spelled that right...) had a cover for | his Commander that covered the fuselage. Do they work..?? Morris has | worked hard to seal windows during annual inspections, but the rain just | keeps coming in and soaking the carpet. | | If anybody has any insight to this situation, I would appreciate hearing | from you. Thanks for your help. | | Wet in San Luis Obispo, CA... | | Randy Dettmer | 680F/N6253X | | | | | | | ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Bow" <bowing74(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Commander Covers
Date: Feb 01, 2005
Here in Florida, the land of the bugs, the leak is from a different place. The Mud Dobbers like to plug up the drain hole for the cabin exhaust scoops. The ones on the roof just aft of the leading edge. Then it rains and the little collection box fills with water since the drain is plugged and it runs down the side wall into the cabin. I thought I was the only one with the problem. My Bruces Cover fixed the problem. bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Dettmer, AIA" <rcdettmer(at)charter.net> Subject: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > > Hello Commanderland > I am looking for a solution to preventing rain water from seeping into my > 680F. Since I do not have the luxury of a hangar to protect my cherished > Commander, I am wondering if anyone has had any sucess with covers. I > remember that Dennis Poletti (hope I spelled that right...) had a cover > for > his Commander that covered the fuselage. Do they work..?? Morris has > worked hard to seal windows during annual inspections, but the rain just > keeps coming in and soaking the carpet. > > If anybody has any insight to this situation, I would appreciate hearing > from you. Thanks for your help. > > Wet in San Luis Obispo, CA... > > Randy Dettmer > 680F/N6253X > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Bow" <bowing74(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: New Engine Monitor in Colemill 500A
Date: Feb 01, 2005
that link didn't work for me. bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Kucheck" <akucheck(at)hotmail.com> Subject: Commander-List: New Engine Monitor in Colemill 500A > > > My mechanic, Fred Holstein, and his son Jeff recently completed the > installation of a JPI engine monitor for me in N811D. The link below > shows > the graph of a flight last weekend. Tought the group might find it > interesting... > > http://www.kucheck.net/Aircraft/Engine%20Monitor%20Data%20for%202005%2001%20 > 23.html > > ak > > -- > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Bow" <bowing74(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Commander Covers
Date: Feb 01, 2005
Some of the windshield manufacturers recommend NOT using a cover. bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com> Subject: Re: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > Randy et. al., > > http://www.aircraftcovers.com/techsheets/ac500.html > > Looks like a pretty good set of options, and at roughly $800 it might be a > good investment... > > Great, thanks guys. With a new interior & windshield to protect, now > you've > got me thinking maybe I should get one too. > > When will I be done spending money on this thing? (that's a rhetorical > question, I already know the answer) > > /J > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lowell Girod" <dongirod(at)earthlink.net> > To: > Subject: RE: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > > >> >> Randy; >> >> I have a cover for my 560E, got it from Bruce's Covers at Sun & Fun last >> year. I never had too much of a problem with leaks but was concerned > about >> the new windshields, however this one goes from just ahead of the >> windshield to over the leading edges. It hooks over the wings to the > flaps >> and two straps under the fuselage. So far I am pleased, I will send you >> a >> picture direct if you are interested. I also have trouble finding a >> hanger, seems like most hangers where I keep my Commander have forty or >> fifty foot doors. >> >> Don >> >> >> > [Original Message] >> > From: Randy Dettmer, AIA <rcdettmer(at)charter.net> >> > To: Commander Chat >> > Date: 1/31/2005 9:32:12 PM >> > Subject: Commander-List: Commander Covers >> > >> >> > >> > Hello Commanderland >> > I am looking for a solution to preventing rain water from seeping into > my >> > 680F. Since I do not have the luxury of a hangar to protect my > cherished >> > Commander, I am wondering if anyone has had any sucess with covers. I >> > remember that Dennis Poletti (hope I spelled that right...) had a cover >> for >> > his Commander that covered the fuselage. Do they work..?? Morris has >> > worked hard to seal windows during annual inspections, but the rain >> > just >> > keeps coming in and soaking the carpet. >> > >> > If anybody has any insight to this situation, I would appreciate >> > hearing >> > from you. Thanks for your help. >> > >> > Wet in San Luis Obispo, CA... >> > >> > Randy Dettmer >> > 680F/N6253X >> > >> > >> >> >> __________ NOD32 1.988 (20050131) Information __________ >> >> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. >> http://www.nod32.com >> >> >> __________ NOD32 1.988 (20050131) Information __________ >> >> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. >> http://www.nod32.com >> >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Dettmer, AIA" <rcdettmer(at)charter.net>
Subject: Commander Covers
Date: Feb 01, 2005
Hi Barry, Darn...forgot about the sunroof. Bet that's my problem. Thanks for the tip. BTW...will we see you at the next flyin in California..?? I'll be sure to be there...along with all of us "west coasters". -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Barry Collman Subject: Re: Commander-List: Commander Covers <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk> Hi Randy, Just a thought, but have you made sure the sun roof is closed! ? ! BC ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Dettmer, AIA" <rcdettmer(at)charter.net> Subject: Commander-List: Commander Covers | | Hello Commanderland | I am looking for a solution to preventing rain water from seeping into my | 680F. Since I do not have the luxury of a hangar to protect my cherished | Commander, I am wondering if anyone has had any sucess with covers. I | remember that Dennis Poletti (hope I spelled that right...) had a cover for | his Commander that covered the fuselage. Do they work..?? Morris has | worked hard to seal windows during annual inspections, but the rain just | keeps coming in and soaking the carpet. | | If anybody has any insight to this situation, I would appreciate hearing | from you. Thanks for your help. | | Wet in San Luis Obispo, CA... | | Randy Dettmer | 680F/N6253X | | | | | | | ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Dettmer, AIA" <rcdettmer(at)charter.net>
Subject: Commander Covers
Date: Feb 01, 2005
Thanks everyone for the excellent response to my questions about covers. I will be looking into a Bruce's Cover. I am planning an interior upgrade, and sure would like to keep it dry. $800 seems like a reasonable expense. The only hangar space I have been able to find at SBP is "half a hangar" at almost $900 a month. RD -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Bill Bow Subject: Re: Commander-List: Commander Covers Some of the windshield manufacturers recommend NOT using a cover. bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com> Subject: Re: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > Randy et. al., > > http://www.aircraftcovers.com/techsheets/ac500.html > > Looks like a pretty good set of options, and at roughly $800 it might be a > good investment... > > Great, thanks guys. With a new interior & windshield to protect, now > you've > got me thinking maybe I should get one too. > > When will I be done spending money on this thing? (that's a rhetorical > question, I already know the answer) > > /J > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lowell Girod" <dongirod(at)earthlink.net> > To: > Subject: RE: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > > >> >> Randy; >> >> I have a cover for my 560E, got it from Bruce's Covers at Sun & Fun last >> year. I never had too much of a problem with leaks but was concerned > about >> the new windshields, however this one goes from just ahead of the >> windshield to over the leading edges. It hooks over the wings to the > flaps >> and two straps under the fuselage. So far I am pleased, I will send you >> a >> picture direct if you are interested. I also have trouble finding a >> hanger, seems like most hangers where I keep my Commander have forty or >> fifty foot doors. >> >> Don >> >> >> > [Original Message] >> > From: Randy Dettmer, AIA <rcdettmer(at)charter.net> >> > To: Commander Chat >> > Date: 1/31/2005 9:32:12 PM >> > Subject: Commander-List: Commander Covers >> > >> >> > >> > Hello Commanderland >> > I am looking for a solution to preventing rain water from seeping into > my >> > 680F. Since I do not have the luxury of a hangar to protect my > cherished >> > Commander, I am wondering if anyone has had any sucess with covers. I >> > remember that Dennis Poletti (hope I spelled that right...) had a cover >> for >> > his Commander that covered the fuselage. Do they work..?? Morris has >> > worked hard to seal windows during annual inspections, but the rain >> > just >> > keeps coming in and soaking the carpet. >> > >> > If anybody has any insight to this situation, I would appreciate >> > hearing >> > from you. Thanks for your help. >> > >> > Wet in San Luis Obispo, CA... >> > >> > Randy Dettmer >> > 680F/N6253X >> > >> > >> >> >> __________ NOD32 1.988 (20050131) Information __________ >> >> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. >> http://www.nod32.com >> >> >> __________ NOD32 1.988 (20050131) Information __________ >> >> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. >> http://www.nod32.com >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 01, 2005
From: Chris Schuermann <cschuerm(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Commander Covers
Randy Dettmer, AIA wrote: > The only hangar space I have been able to find at SBP is "half a hangar" at > almost $900 a month. OUCH! Whenever I start thinking that Oklahoma is a sorry place to live, somebody comes along and reminds me there are some positives. I pay $150/month for a nice, insulated and heated hangar and 100LL is $2.25/gal. ($1.95 for self serve). My hat's off to you guys who havn't just given up on flying due to the expense! Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Alan Kucheck" <akucheck(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: New Engine Monitor in Colemill 500A
Date: Feb 01, 2005
Sometimes browsers mess spaces up. This one should work... http://www.kucheck.net/Aircraft/EngineData20050123.html ak > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf > Of Bill Bow > Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 6:05 AM > To: commander-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: Commander-List: New Engine Monitor in Colemill 500A > > --> > > that link didn't work for me. > > bilbo > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alan Kucheck" <akucheck(at)hotmail.com> > To: > Subject: Commander-List: New Engine Monitor in Colemill 500A > > > > > > > > My mechanic, Fred Holstein, and his son Jeff recently completed the > > installation of a JPI engine monitor for me in N811D. The > link below > > shows > > the graph of a flight last weekend. Tought the group might find it > > interesting... > > > > > http://www.kucheck.net/Aircraft/Engine%20Monitor%20Data%20for% > 202005%2001%20 > > 23.html > > > > ak > > > > -- > > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > > > > > > > > > ========= > ========= > ========= > > > > > > -- > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > > -- Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom Fisher" <tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca>
Subject: Re: New Engine Monitor in Colemill 500A
Date: Feb 01, 2005
I get "page cannot be found". Tom F ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Kucheck" <akucheck(at)hotmail.com> Subject: Commander-List: New Engine Monitor in Colemill 500A > > My mechanic, Fred Holstein, and his son Jeff recently completed the > installation of a JPI engine monitor for me in N811D. The link below shows > the graph of a flight last weekend. Tought the group might find it > interesting... > > http://www.kucheck.net/Aircraft/Engine%20Monitor%20Data%20for%202005%2001%20 > 23.html > > ak > > -- > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: Commander Covers
Date: Feb 01, 2005
Where in California will it be held? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Dettmer, AIA" <rcdettmer(at)charter.net> Subject: RE: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > Hi Barry, > Darn...forgot about the sunroof. Bet that's my problem. Thanks for the > tip. BTW...will we see you at the next flyin in California..?? I'll be > sure to be there...along with all of us "west coasters". > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Barry > Collman > To: commander-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > > <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk> > > Hi Randy, > > Just a thought, but have you made sure the sun roof is closed! ? ! > > BC > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Randy Dettmer, AIA" <rcdettmer(at)charter.net> > To: "Commander Chat" > Subject: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > > > | > | Hello Commanderland > | I am looking for a solution to preventing rain water from seeping into my > | 680F. Since I do not have the luxury of a hangar to protect my cherished > | Commander, I am wondering if anyone has had any sucess with covers. I > | remember that Dennis Poletti (hope I spelled that right...) had a cover > for > | his Commander that covered the fuselage. Do they work..?? Morris has > | worked hard to seal windows during annual inspections, but the rain just > | keeps coming in and soaking the carpet. > | > | If anybody has any insight to this situation, I would appreciate hearing > | from you. Thanks for your help. > | > | Wet in San Luis Obispo, CA... > | > | Randy Dettmer > | 680F/N6253X > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Fw: Lucky GI
Date: Feb 01, 2005
Subject: FW: Lucky GI checks out on http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/t/toothmiracle.htm and snopes.com Christmas Eve morning a soldier came into our clinic at the Ibn Sina Hospital in downtown Baghdad covered in his own blood. He recounted an incredible story. Early Christmas Eve morning, two squads were assigned to sweep and clear two adjacent homes where Iraq terrorists were holed-up. The patient, SGT C, was leading one of those assault squads. The other squad hit their target first. SGT C said that he heard a lot of small arms fire and yelling, so he thought he would round the corner and size up the situation before advancing his team. Unfortunately, as he turned the corner, he found himself staring directly into the barrel of a 9mm automatic pistol. SGT C said he never had time to be scared, he just knew he was dead. The terrorist pulled the trigger and, miraculously, SGT C found himself still standing. He figured the bullet had missed. He advanced on the Iraqi, who immediately surrendered. After the enemy was rounded up, SGT C said he started to feel light headed and one of his soldiers insisted that he proceed to the hospital. He realized at this time that he had lost his front tooth in the gun fight. He figured the ballistic shock from the weapon's blast had knocked it loose. He was wrong. When he presented early that morning Major Kimberly Perkins, our oral surgeon, took a panograph and discovered the incredible truth. The 9mm bullet did NOT miss SGT C. He was hit directly in the face. The bullet entered just below his nose where it impacted the apex of #8. The energy from the bullet was transferred to the tooth, literally ejecting the tooth from its socket, and stopping the bullet in its track. Other than the missing tooth, the majority of SGT C's injuries were confined to soft tissue. (Embedded image moved to file: pic24626.jpg) Here is the pan with the bullet clearly visible, embedded in the upper lip. (Embedded image moved to file: pic11323.jpg) SGT C is a citizen soldier - a reservist. When he returns to the states, the Army will see he has an implant replacement for the missing #8. Meanwhile, the prosthodontist in Baghdad, LTC Richard Druckman, made him an acrylic interim treatment partial. When SGT C came in for the prosthesis, I said "Can you imagine what the enemy thought when he shot you point blank in the face, and you just kept coming at him! ! Americans are invincible. No wonder he surrendered so fast!" (Embedded image moved to file: pic05537.pcx) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Barry Collman" <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Commander Covers
Date: Feb 01, 2005
Hi Randy, I'll be there and am hoping to see lots of Commanders! Barry C. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Dettmer, AIA" <rcdettmer(at)charter.net> Subject: RE: Commander-List: Commander Covers | | Hi Barry, | Darn...forgot about the sunroof. Bet that's my problem. Thanks for the | tip. BTW...will we see you at the next flyin in California..?? I'll be | sure to be there...along with all of us "west coasters". | | -----Original Message----- | From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com | [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Barry | Collman | To: commander-list(at)matronics.com | Subject: Re: Commander-List: Commander Covers | | | <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk> | | Hi Randy, | | Just a thought, but have you made sure the sun roof is closed! ? ! | | BC | | | ----- Original Message ----- | From: "Randy Dettmer, AIA" <rcdettmer(at)charter.net> | To: "Commander Chat" | Subject: Commander-List: Commander Covers | | | | | | | Hello Commanderland | | I am looking for a solution to preventing rain water from seeping into my | | 680F. Since I do not have the luxury of a hangar to protect my cherished | | Commander, I am wondering if anyone has had any sucess with covers. I | | remember that Dennis Poletti (hope I spelled that right...) had a cover | for | | his Commander that covered the fuselage. Do they work..?? Morris has | | worked hard to seal windows during annual inspections, but the rain just | | keeps coming in and soaking the carpet. | | | | If anybody has any insight to this situation, I would appreciate hearing | | from you. Thanks for your help. | | | | Wet in San Luis Obispo, CA... | | | | Randy Dettmer | | 680F/N6253X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "tylor.hall" <tylor.hall(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Commander Covers
Date: Feb 01, 2005
Tom, Sounds great, go. Dick MacCoon lives just South of you. You may want to go see him. He is full of a lot of information about your aircraft. There is a lot of information tucked away in his head. He is very open to talking about his aircraft. He is treasure that wants to talk. Tylor Hall After I sign I will tell all. Tom F. ----- Original Message ----- From: <CloudCraft(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > In a message dated 31-Jan-05 18:44:13 Pacific Standard Time, > tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca writes: > > > I sign for my 680FLP Mr. RPM tomorrow, I'm so excited I can hardly contain > > myself. > > Tom! > > That's great news. Which one are you buying? > > Wing Commander Gordon > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom Fisher" <tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca>
Subject: Re: Commander Covers
Date: Feb 01, 2005
You bet, I signed the papers with the bank today and will be sending payment this week. Tom F. ----- Original Message ----- From: "tylor.hall" <tylor.hall(at)sbcglobal.net> Subject: RE: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > Tom, > Sounds great, go. > Dick MacCoon lives just South of you. You may want to go see him. > He is full of a lot of information about your aircraft. > There is a lot of information tucked away in his head. > He is very open to talking about his aircraft. He is treasure that wants to > talk. > Tylor Hall > > > After I sign I will tell all. > Tom F. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <CloudCraft(at)aol.com> > To: > Subject: Re: Commander-List: Commander Covers > > > > > > In a message dated 31-Jan-05 18:44:13 Pacific Standard Time, > > tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca writes: > > > > > I sign for my 680FLP Mr. RPM tomorrow, I'm so excited I can hardly > contain > > > myself. > > > > Tom! > > > > That's great news. Which one are you buying? > > > > Wing Commander Gordon > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com>
Subject: Jeremy Johnson & FAA Action
Date: Feb 02, 2005
Hi all, I thought you might like a follow up as to what has been happening with Jeremy and his case with the FAA. Jeremy got a call from the Desert News last Friday asking him to comment on the letter Orrin Hatch had written to the FAA. Jeremy didn't know that Senator Hatch had written anything, so they emailed him a copy of the letter. Here's a copy of the letter the deseret news got ahold of from Senator Orrin Hatch to the administrator of the FAA: January 28, 2005 Administrator Marion Blakey Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave. S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Dear Administrator Blakey: I was extremely disappointed to learn that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is investigating the conduct of Jeremy Johnson, a St. George, Utah, pilot who risked his life to help people stranded by severe flooding this month in Utah. Washington County experienced the worst flood in more than 100 years, and literally dozens of lives were saved because Jeremy responded to their call for help. He rescued a stranded family from harm, air-lifted food to many others to sustain them until more help could arrive, and, at the request of rescue workers, carried explosives to remove blockages on the river that contributed to the flooding. You can understand why I am upset to hear rumors that he may face fines and even lose his license because he failed to follow proper FAA protocol during this crisis. I would expect that you or anyone else in Jeremy's case would have done whatever was in your power to help people whose homes were washing away and whose lives were hanging in the balance. While I understand the well-intentioned reasons behind FAA rules, I would expect those like Jeremy would be rewarded with appreciation and recognition, not with fines and threats to remove their licenses. As they say, "desperate times call for desperate measures" and when local townspeople and authorities came to Jeremy with requests for help, he responded in kind. For this, he should be applauded. Given the extenuating circumstances surrounding the investigation of Jeremy, I am requesting that you take a personal interest in this investigation. I would be extremely disappointed to see Jeremy unjustly punished by the FAA for his heroic actions. I look forward to hearing from you on this important matter and learning what the FAA can do to help Jeremy and the citizens of southern Utah deal with the difficult task of recovering from such a devastating flood. Sincerely, Orrin G. Hatch United States Senator Haven't heard if the FAA has responded to Senator Hatch yet, but my guess is that they will. __________________________________ http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: Jeremy Johnson & FAA Action
Date: Feb 02, 2005
I am sure the FAA will respond. This letter left no room for discretion by anyone. Good for sen. Hatch. There is some sense in D.C. after all. Please keep us posted. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com> Subject: Commander-List: Jeremy Johnson & FAA Action > > Hi all, > > I thought you might like a follow up as to what has been happening with > Jeremy and his case with the FAA. Jeremy got a call from the Desert News > last Friday asking him to comment on the letter Orrin Hatch had written > to the FAA. Jeremy didn't know that Senator Hatch had written anything, > so they emailed him a copy of the letter. Here's a copy of the letter > the > deseret news got ahold of from Senator Orrin Hatch to the administrator > of the FAA: > > January 28, 2005 > > > Administrator Marion Blakey > Federal Aviation Administration > 800 Independence Ave. S.W. > Washington, D.C. 20591 > > Dear Administrator Blakey: > > I was extremely disappointed to learn that the Federal Aviation > Administration (FAA) is investigating the conduct of Jeremy Johnson, a > St. George, Utah, pilot who risked his life to help people stranded by > severe flooding this month in Utah. > > Washington County experienced the worst flood in more than 100 years, > and literally dozens of lives were saved because Jeremy responded to > their call for help. He rescued a stranded family from harm, air-lifted > food to many others to sustain them until more help could arrive, and, > at the request of rescue workers, carried explosives to remove blockages > on the river that contributed to the flooding. > > You can understand why I am upset to hear rumors that he may face fines > and even lose his license because he failed to follow proper FAA > protocol during this crisis. I would expect that you or anyone else in > Jeremy's case would have done whatever was in your power to help people > whose homes were washing away and whose lives were hanging in the > balance. > > While I understand the well-intentioned reasons behind FAA rules, I > would expect those like Jeremy would be rewarded with appreciation and > recognition, not with fines and threats to remove their licenses. As > they say, "desperate times call for desperate measures" and > when local townspeople and authorities came to Jeremy with requests for > help, he responded in kind. For this, he should be applauded. > > Given the extenuating circumstances surrounding the investigation of > Jeremy, I am requesting that you take a personal interest in this > investigation. I would be extremely disappointed to see Jeremy unjustly > punished by the FAA for his heroic actions. > > I look forward to hearing from you on this important matter and learning > what the FAA can do to help Jeremy and the citizens of southern Utah > deal with the difficult task of recovering from such a devastating > flood. > > Sincerely, > > > Orrin G. Hatch > United States Senator > > Haven't heard if the FAA has responded to Senator Hatch yet, but my > guess is that they will. > > > __________________________________ > http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: She's HOME!
Date: Feb 02, 2005
Commanderland, After an extended wait, N353CC is back home in her new livery. Check out the pics at: http://www.vormbaum.com/sys-tmpl/thenewmoby/ VERY SPECIAL THANKS need to go out to Captain Jimbob, for being a tireless and patient ferry pilot, and an even better friend for watching out for my best interests: a wasted trip....he flew out only to discover that the airplane wasn't finished, and wrote up a 65-squawk list, and kicked them in the butt to get it fixed. Then 10 days later he repeated the trip to get the airplane home for me. THANKS JIM! No more back-40 portion of the ramp for me anymore, at this year's fly-in I'll be looking for a front-row spot with the big boys! /John ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Dettmer, AIA" <rcdettmer(at)charter.net>
Subject: She's HOME!
Date: Feb 02, 2005
Hey John... WOW...what a gorgeous bird..!! I really like the black treatment around the windshield...makes it look like a turbine machine. I have been thinking about a similar upgrade for my 680F, and would like to know the details of your project...who did it, how much, how long...etc. Congrats..!!! Bet you're one excited fellow. And kudos to JB for his excellent assistance in the project. Randy D. 680F/N6253X -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of John Vormbaum Subject: Commander-List: She's HOME! Commanderland, After an extended wait, N353CC is back home in her new livery. Check out the pics at: http://www.vormbaum.com/sys-tmpl/thenewmoby/ VERY SPECIAL THANKS need to go out to Captain Jimbob, for being a tireless and patient ferry pilot, and an even better friend for watching out for my best interests: a wasted trip....he flew out only to discover that the airplane wasn't finished, and wrote up a 65-squawk list, and kicked them in the butt to get it fixed. Then 10 days later he repeated the trip to get the airplane home for me. THANKS JIM! No more back-40 portion of the ramp for me anymore, at this year's fly-in I'll be looking for a front-row spot with the big boys! /John ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Moe" <moe(at)rosspistons.com>
Subject: Re: She's HOME!
Date: Feb 02, 2005
John, This look really great! I think that I might get out a rattle can and copy your windshield trim. It sure makes your bird look sleek! Congratulations! Moe N680RR ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Dettmer, AIA" <rcdettmer(at)charter.net> Subject: RE: Commander-List: She's HOME! > > Hey John... > WOW...what a gorgeous bird..!! I really like the black treatment around the > windshield...makes it look like a turbine machine. I have been thinking > about a similar upgrade for my 680F, and would like to know the details of > your project...who did it, how much, how long...etc. > > Congrats..!!! Bet you're one excited fellow. And kudos to JB for his > excellent assistance in the project. > > Randy D. > 680F/N6253X > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of John > Vormbaum > To: commander-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Commander-List: She's HOME! > > > Commanderland, > > After an extended wait, N353CC is back home in her new livery. Check out the > pics at: http://www.vormbaum.com/sys-tmpl/thenewmoby/ > > VERY SPECIAL THANKS need to go out to Captain Jimbob, for being a tireless > and patient ferry pilot, and an even better friend for watching out for my > best interests: a wasted trip....he flew out only to discover that the > airplane wasn't finished, and wrote up a 65-squawk list, and kicked them in > the butt to get it fixed. Then 10 days later he repeated the trip to get the > airplane home for me. THANKS JIM! > > No more back-40 portion of the ramp for me anymore, at this year's fly-in > I'll be looking for a front-row spot with the big boys! > > /John > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: She's HOME!
Date: Feb 02, 2005
Congratulations, John. She is a thing of beauty. I browsed around your site a bit. Hope you don't mind. That hillside next to the house would look better with a strip on it, you know. Very nice. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com> Subject: Commander-List: She's HOME! > > Commanderland, > > After an extended wait, N353CC is back home in her new livery. Check out the pics at: http://www.vormbaum.com/sys-tmpl/thenewmoby/ > > VERY SPECIAL THANKS need to go out to Captain Jimbob, for being a tireless and patient ferry pilot, and an even better friend for watching out for my best interests: a wasted trip....he flew out only to discover that the airplane wasn't finished, and wrote up a 65-squawk list, and kicked them in the butt to get it fixed. Then 10 days later he repeated the trip to get the airplane home for me. THANKS JIM! > > No more back-40 portion of the ramp for me anymore, at this year's fly-in I'll be looking for a front-row spot with the big boys! > > /John > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Dettmer, AIA" <rcdettmer(at)charter.net>
Subject: She's HOME!
Date: Feb 02, 2005
John, Checked out your website too...great family pictures..!! I recognize the house site, with Bishop's Peak in the background. That's just around the corner from me. Are we going to be seeing you permanently down here in SLOtown..?? RD -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of nico css Subject: Re: Commander-List: She's HOME! Congratulations, John. She is a thing of beauty. I browsed around your site a bit. Hope you don't mind. That hillside next to the house would look better with a strip on it, you know. Very nice. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com> Subject: Commander-List: She's HOME! > > Commanderland, > > After an extended wait, N353CC is back home in her new livery. Check out the pics at: http://www.vormbaum.com/sys-tmpl/thenewmoby/ > > VERY SPECIAL THANKS need to go out to Captain Jimbob, for being a tireless and patient ferry pilot, and an even better friend for watching out for my best interests: a wasted trip....he flew out only to discover that the airplane wasn't finished, and wrote up a 65-squawk list, and kicked them in the butt to get it fixed. Then 10 days later he repeated the trip to get the airplane home for me. THANKS JIM! > > No more back-40 portion of the ramp for me anymore, at this year's fly-in I'll be looking for a front-row spot with the big boys! > > /John > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "MASON CHEVAILLIER" <Kamala(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: She's HOME!
Date: Feb 02, 2005
JV, WOW, DOESN'T SHE LOOK NICE! HAPPY AND SAFE FLYING. MASON ----- Original Message ----- From: Randy Dettmer, AIA<mailto:rcdettmer(at)charter.net> To: commander-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 6:47 PM Subject: RE: Commander-List: She's HOME! John, Checked out your website too...great family pictures..!! I recognize the house site, with Bishop's Peak in the background. That's just around the corner from me. Are we going to be seeing you permanently down here in SLOtown..?? RD -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com<mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com> [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of nico css To: commander-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Re: Commander-List: She's HOME! Congratulations, John. She is a thing of beauty. I browsed around your site a bit. Hope you don't mind. That hillside next to the house would look better with a strip on it, you know. Very nice. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com<mailto:john(at)vormbaum.com>> To: > Subject: Commander-List: She's HOME! > > Commanderland, > > After an extended wait, N353CC is back home in her new livery. Check out the pics at: http://www.vormbaum.com/sys-tmpl/thenewmoby/> > > VERY SPECIAL THANKS need to go out to Captain Jimbob, for being a tireless and patient ferry pilot, and an even better friend for watching out for my best interests: a wasted trip....he flew out only to discover that the airplane wasn't finished, and wrote up a 65-squawk list, and kicked them in the butt to get it fixed. Then 10 days later he repeated the trip to get the airplane home for me. THANKS JIM! > > No more back-40 portion of the ramp for me anymore, at this year's fly-in I'll be looking for a front-row spot with the big boys! > > /John > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com
Date: Feb 02, 2005
Subject: Re: She's HOME
In a message dated 02-Feb-05 16:48:49 Pacific Standard Time, rcdettmer(at)charter.net writes: > Checked out your website too...great family pictures..!! I recognize the > house site, with Bishop's Peak in the background. Ditto! You're between SLO and Los Osos, aren't you? One of my favorite areas in the entire world. Your Commander looks terrific. Now, was that placed in it's parking spot via tug, or did JimBob really taxi in right on the stripe? Tell the truth. Enjoy! Wing Commander Gordon Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com
Date: Feb 02, 2005
Subject: Re: Jeremy Johnson & FAA Action
In a message dated 02-Feb-05 06:58:34 Pacific Standard Time, kerry(at)kvelectric.com writes: > Haven't heard if the FAA has responded to Senator Hatch yet, but my > guess is that they will. Count on it. Excellent development. Hatch isn't exactly a junior senator and Blakely doesn't want to get on his bad side, if she's half smart. Wing Commander Gordon Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Bow" <bowing74(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: She's HOME!
Date: Feb 02, 2005
Wow! Very pretty John. Yours is the only one, I've seen, with the same nose as mine. It must be the Morris Beenie. Something is leaking onto the left tire from the left engine.:>) bilob ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com> Subject: Commander-List: She's HOME! > > Commanderland, > > After an extended wait, N353CC is back home in her new livery. Check out > the pics at:
http://www.vormbaum.com/sys-tmpl/thenewmoby/ > > VERY SPECIAL THANKS need to go out to Captain Jimbob, for being a tireless > and patient ferry pilot, and an even better friend for watching out for my > best interests: a wasted trip....he flew out only to discover that the > airplane wasn't finished, and wrote up a 65-squawk list, and kicked them > in the butt to get it fixed. Then 10 days later he repeated the trip to > get the airplane home for me. THANKS JIM! > > No more back-40 portion of the ramp for me anymore, at this year's fly-in > I'll be looking for a front-row spot with the big boys! > > /John > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "MASON CHEVAILLIER" <Kamala(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: She's HOME
Date: Feb 02, 2005
kg, tacky, tacky. mason ----- Original Message ----- From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com<mailto:CloudCraft(at)aol.com> To: commander-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 7:27 PM Subject: Re: Commander-List: She's HOME In a message dated 02-Feb-05 16:48:49 Pacific Standard Time, rcdettmer(at)charter.net writes: > Checked out your website too...great family pictures..!! I recognize the > house site, with Bishop's Peak in the background. Ditto! You're between SLO and Los Osos, aren't you? One of my favorite areas in the entire world. Your Commander looks terrific. Now, was that placed in it's parking spot via tug, or did JimBob really taxi in right on the stripe? Tell the truth. Enjoy! Wing Commander Gordon Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: She's HOME!
Date: Feb 02, 2005
Yeah I really liked how the black bandito mask came out! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Moe" <moe(at)rosspistons.com> Subject: Re: Commander-List: She's HOME! > > John, > > This look really great! I think that I might get out a rattle can and copy > your windshield trim. It sure makes your bird look sleek! Congratulations! > > Moe > N680RR > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Randy Dettmer, AIA" <rcdettmer(at)charter.net> > To: > Subject: RE: Commander-List: She's HOME! > > > > > > > Hey John... > > WOW...what a gorgeous bird..!! I really like the black treatment around > the > > windshield...makes it look like a turbine machine. I have been thinking > > about a similar upgrade for my 680F, and would like to know the details of > > your project...who did it, how much, how long...etc. > > > > Congrats..!!! Bet you're one excited fellow. And kudos to JB for his > > excellent assistance in the project. > > > > Randy D. > > 680F/N6253X > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com > > [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of John > > Vormbaum > > To: commander-list(at)matronics.com > > Subject: Commander-List: She's HOME! > > > > > > > > Commanderland, > > > > After an extended wait, N353CC is back home in her new livery. Check out > the > > pics at: http://www.vormbaum.com/sys-tmpl/thenewmoby/ > > > > VERY SPECIAL THANKS need to go out to Captain Jimbob, for being a tireless > > and patient ferry pilot, and an even better friend for watching out for my > > best interests: a wasted trip....he flew out only to discover that the > > airplane wasn't finished, and wrote up a 65-squawk list, and kicked them > in > > the butt to get it fixed. Then 10 days later he repeated the trip to get > the > > airplane home for me. THANKS JIM! > > > > No more back-40 portion of the ramp for me anymore, at this year's fly-in > > I'll be looking for a front-row spot with the big boys! > > > > /John > > > > > > > __________ NOD32 1.989 (20050131) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > > __________ NOD32 1.989 (20050131) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: She's HOME!
Date: Feb 02, 2005
Hi Nico, A lot of that information is old stuff....but I agree about the strip! ----- Original Message ----- From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com> Subject: Re: Commander-List: She's HOME! > > Congratulations, John. She is a thing of beauty. > > I browsed around your site a bit. Hope you don't mind. That hillside next to > the house would look better with a strip on it, you know. > > Very nice. > > Nico > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com> > To: > Subject: Commander-List: She's HOME! > > > > > > Commanderland, > > > > After an extended wait, N353CC is back home in her new livery. Check out > the pics at: http://www.vormbaum.com/sys-tmpl/thenewmoby/ > > > > VERY SPECIAL THANKS need to go out to Captain Jimbob, for being a tireless > and patient ferry pilot, and an even better friend for watching out for my > best interests: a wasted trip....he flew out only to discover that the > airplane wasn't finished, and wrote up a 65-squawk list, and kicked them in > the butt to get it fixed. Then 10 days later he repeated the trip to get the > airplane home for me. THANKS JIM! > > > > No more back-40 portion of the ramp for me anymore, at this year's fly-in > I'll be looking for a front-row spot with the big boys! > > > > /John > > > > > > > __________ NOD32 1.989 (20050131) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > > __________ NOD32 1.989 (20050131) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: She's HOME
Date: Feb 02, 2005
Keith, That bit of property belongs to my younger brother. They bought the land in '99 and in Aug. of '04 they completed & moved into their house. SLO is one of my favorite destinations. Randy D. is fortunate to live there! As for the park job, what makes you think I'll tell a former "Golden Pedal Award" winner the parking secrets of the pros ;-)? Cheers, /J ----- Original Message ----- From: <CloudCraft(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: Commander-List: She's HOME > > In a message dated 02-Feb-05 16:48:49 Pacific Standard Time, > rcdettmer(at)charter.net writes: > > > Checked out your website too...great family pictures..!! I recognize the > > house site, with Bishop's Peak in the background. > > Ditto! You're between SLO and Los Osos, aren't you? One of my favorite > areas in the entire world. > > Your Commander looks terrific. > > Now, was that placed in it's parking spot via tug, or did JimBob really taxi > in right on the stripe? Tell the truth. > > Enjoy! > > Wing Commander Gordon > > Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. > > > __________ NOD32 1.989 (20050131) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > > __________ NOD32 1.989 (20050131) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: She's HOME!
Date: Feb 02, 2005
LOL, Bilbo, That leak is heinous! I have a crack in the housing for the oil fiter on that engine. I can't believe you noticed....if you hadn't, nobody would be the wiser, as I've had the Airwolf remote-mounted filter kits waiting in Morris' shop for the return of the airplane. By Saturday it will no longer be an issue! (well.....THAT leak won't be an issue) Thanks, /J ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Bow" <bowing74(at)earthlink.net> Subject: Re: Commander-List: She's HOME! > > Wow! Very pretty John. > > Yours is the only one, I've seen, with the same nose as mine. It must be > the Morris Beenie. > > Something is leaking onto the left tire from the left engine.:>) > > bilob > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com> > To: > Subject: Commander-List: She's HOME! > > > > > > Commanderland, > > > > After an extended wait, N353CC is back home in her new livery. Check out > > the pics at: http://www.vormbaum.com/sys-tmpl/thenewmoby/ > > > > VERY SPECIAL THANKS need to go out to Captain Jimbob, for being a tireless > > and patient ferry pilot, and an even better friend for watching out for my > > best interests: a wasted trip....he flew out only to discover that the > > airplane wasn't finished, and wrote up a 65-squawk list, and kicked them > > in the butt to get it fixed. Then 10 days later he repeated the trip to > > get the airplane home for me. THANKS JIM! > > > > No more back-40 portion of the ramp for me anymore, at this year's fly-in > > I'll be looking for a front-row spot with the big boys! > > > > /John > > > > > > > > > __________ NOD32 1.989 (20050131) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > > __________ NOD32 1.989 (20050131) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Barry Collman" <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: Re: She's HOME!
Date: Feb 03, 2005
Hi John! Very nice-looking machine! I've always liked the black surround to the cockpit area. It sort of makes a "this is my office" statement. It's akin to people who have a moustache. They think their nose is so important, they underline it!! Now, be sure and keep it in good shape for pride of place in the Fly-In line-up! Very Best Regards, Barry C. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com> Subject: Commander-List: She's HOME! | | Commanderland, | | After an extended wait, N353CC is back home in her new livery. Check out the pics at: http://www.vormbaum.com/sys-tmpl/thenewmoby/ | | VERY SPECIAL THANKS need to go out to Captain Jimbob, for being a tireless and patient ferry pilot, and an even better friend for watching out for my best interests: a wasted trip....he flew out only to discover that the airplane wasn't finished, and wrote up a 65-squawk list, and kicked them in the butt to get it fixed. Then 10 days later he repeated the trip to get the airplane home for me. THANKS JIM! | | No more back-40 portion of the ramp for me anymore, at this year's fly-in I'll be looking for a front-row spot with the big boys! | | /John | | | | | | | ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Bow" <bowing74(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: She's HOME!
Date: Feb 03, 2005
>>It's akin to people who have a moustache. They think their nose is so >>important, they underline it!! You suppose that's why Hoover has a handlebar mustache???? bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barry Collman" <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk> Subject: Re: Commander-List: She's HOME! > <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk> > > Hi John! > > Very nice-looking machine! > > I've always liked the black surround to the cockpit area. It sort of makes > a > "this is my office" statement. > > It's akin to people who have a moustache. They think their nose is so > important, > they underline it!! > > Now, be sure and keep it in good shape for pride of place in the Fly-In > line-up! > > Very Best Regards, > Barry C. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com> > To: > Subject: Commander-List: She's HOME! > > > > | > | Commanderland, > | > | After an extended wait, N353CC is back home in her new livery. Check out > the > pics at: http://www.vormbaum.com/sys-tmpl/thenewmoby/ > | > | VERY SPECIAL THANKS need to go out to Captain Jimbob, for being a > tireless and > patient ferry pilot, and an even better friend for watching out for my > best > interests: a wasted trip....he flew out only to discover that the airplane > wasn't finished, and wrote up a 65-squawk list, and kicked them in the > butt to > get it fixed. Then 10 days later he repeated the trip to get the airplane > home > for me. THANKS JIM! > | > | No more back-40 portion of the ramp for me anymore, at this year's > fly-in I'll > be looking for a front-row spot with the big boys! > | > | /John > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 04, 2005
Subject: Re: She's HOME!
From: Russell Legg <rlegg(at)austarnet.com.au>
G'day John, Congratulations old mate!! Great to see the new paint job/interior. Nice parking spot right at the base of the tower. Couldn't quite make out any champagne marks on the front tire, but a big Ozzie toast coming your way... Hey, well done for sticking to that 5 year business plan to bring it up to scratch. Cheers Russell On 3/2/05 9:25 AM, "John Vormbaum" wrote: > > Commanderland, > > After an extended wait, N353CC is back home in her new livery. Check out the > pics at: http://www.vormbaum.com/sys-tmpl/thenewmoby/ > > VERY SPECIAL THANKS need to go out to Captain Jimbob, for being a tireless and > patient ferry pilot, and an even better friend for watching out for my best > interests: a wasted trip....he flew out only to discover that the airplane > wasn't finished, and wrote up a 65-squawk list, and kicked them in the butt to > get it fixed. Then 10 days later he repeated the trip to get the airplane home > for me. THANKS JIM! > > No more back-40 portion of the ramp for me anymore, at this year's fly-in I'll > be looking for a front-row spot with the big boys! > > /John > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com>
Subject: Jeremy Johnson & FAA Action
Date: Feb 03, 2005
I agree, Hatch is well known and I doubt Blakely wants to butt heads with him. We also understand that Senator Bennett is or has written Blakely a letter along the same lines as Hatch. Bennett as you probably know is on the Transportation Board Appropriations Committee, so he has direct financial oversight of the FAA. It should be interesting to see how this all plays out. Kerry -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of CloudCraft(at)aol.com Subject: Re: Commander-List: Jeremy Johnson & FAA Action In a message dated 02-Feb-05 06:58:34 Pacific Standard Time, kerry(at)kvelectric.com writes: > Haven't heard if the FAA has responded to Senator Hatch yet, but my > guess is that they will. Count on it. Excellent development. Hatch isn't exactly a junior senator and Blakely doesn't want to get on his bad side, if she's half smart. Wing Commander Gordon Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: Jeremy Johnson & FAA Action
Date: Feb 03, 2005
I guess this is the time Blakely wished this was just a quiet incident, huh? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com> Subject: RE: Commander-List: Jeremy Johnson & FAA Action > > I agree, Hatch is well known and I doubt Blakely wants to butt heads > with him. We also understand that Senator Bennett is or has written > Blakely a letter along the same lines as Hatch. Bennett as you probably > know is on the Transportation Board Appropriations Committee, so he has > direct financial oversight of the FAA. It should be interesting to see > how this all plays out. > > Kerry > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of > CloudCraft(at)aol.com > To: commander-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: Commander-List: Jeremy Johnson & FAA Action > > > In a message dated 02-Feb-05 06:58:34 Pacific Standard Time, > kerry(at)kvelectric.com writes: > > > Haven't heard if the FAA has responded to Senator Hatch yet, but my > > guess is that they will. > > Count on it. Excellent development. Hatch isn't exactly a junior > senator and Blakely doesn't want to get on his bad side, if she's half > smart. > > Wing Commander Gordon > > Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Props
Date: Feb 03, 2005
From: "Matthew J. Hawkins" <hawkins(at)cms.udel.edu>
Dan- I apologize if you (and everyone else) are getting this message again. I've had trouble getting subscribed to the mailing list and not sure if the original message went out - I got a number of kickbacks, but I'm at least receiving traffic again. Yes - we could use a set of props! I'm new to the group. About a year ago, my father bought N2760B here in Georgetown, Delaware (GED) and was doing a complete refurbishment to her. Unfortunately, he passed away suddenly in November before he finished the project. My family and I are pressing on with completing Dad's project. I've attached a couple of photos of where we are in the process. Engines are due back from overhaul in the next week or so. All we need are props and we've had one hell of a time trying to find a decent set - w/o paying the $28K each! All help appreciated! My mechanic is checking the numbers of what you have to make sure they'll work - GO480 engines, so 99% sure they'd be OK. The props that were originally on her were: HC83X20-2C But I understand those only have a 250 hr AD on them. Please let me know if you still have (or if anyone else has a set) and feel free to e-mail or call direct. Matt Hawkins hawkins(at)udel.edu 302-645-4341 (work) 302-424-1852 (home) 410-924-2472 (cell) -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Stewart Subject: Commander-List: Anyone need props? --> Hey Commanderland. Does anyone have need for a pair of practically new props. They have only 30hours on them. These are the new MV shank props from Hartzell that are direct replacements for the originals. They are 3 bladed, 84 for the spline shaft engines, such as GO480B. Model #: HC-A3MV20-2/MV8433N These were the permanent solution to AD 97-18-02. New ones are $28,870 each I will part with these for much less. If interested, reply directly to me to avoid unnecessary chatter on the commander board. Thanks, Dan ******************** Matthew Hawkins Director, Marine Ops R/V Cape Henlopen 302-645-4341 FAX: 302-645-4006 hawkins(at)udel.edu ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com>
Subject: Jeremy Johnson & FAA Action
Date: Feb 03, 2005
That would be my guess and I'll bet she is wishing the field agent that tattled on Jeremy was a bit less zealous. -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of nico css Subject: Re: Commander-List: Jeremy Johnson & FAA Action --> I guess this is the time Blakely wished this was just a quiet incident, huh? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kerry Johnson" <kerry(at)kvelectric.com> Subject: RE: Commander-List: Jeremy Johnson & FAA Action > > I agree, Hatch is well known and I doubt Blakely wants to butt heads > with him. We also understand that Senator Bennett is or has written > Blakely a letter along the same lines as Hatch. Bennett as you > probably know is on the Transportation Board Appropriations Committee, > so he has direct financial oversight of the FAA. It should be > interesting to see how this all plays out. > > Kerry > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of > CloudCraft(at)aol.com > To: commander-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: Commander-List: Jeremy Johnson & FAA Action > > > In a message dated 02-Feb-05 06:58:34 Pacific Standard Time, > kerry(at)kvelectric.com writes: > > > Haven't heard if the FAA has responded to Senator Hatch yet, but my > > guess is that they will. > > Count on it. Excellent development. Hatch isn't exactly a junior > senator and Blakely doesn't want to get on his bad side, if she's half > smart. > > Wing Commander Gordon > > Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Lowell Girod" <dongirod(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: She's HOME!
Date: Feb 03, 2005
John; A very nice looking Commander. I have my 560E done similar, except I swept the strips up the tail. My interior is gray leather like yours, but my inside window frames are not nearly as nice, did you get new ones or just refurbish the old ones, beautiful and I know you are proud of it. A beautiful lady is always an asset, all things considered. Don ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: She's HOME!
Date: Feb 03, 2005
Hi Don, Honestly...I'm not sure! I didn't get a chance to really pick at the interior yesterday. I *think* they just refurbished the existing window frames, but you've made me curious. I'll let you know, after I take a closer look. I'm very pleased with the way the paint scheme came out. By not going up the tail like most Commanders, I took a little risk. In the end I think it accomplished my goal, which was to make the airplane look longer and graceful. Should be good for 7 years or so! /J ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lowell Girod" <dongirod(at)earthlink.net> Subject: Re: Commander-List: She's HOME! > > John; > > A very nice looking Commander. I have my 560E done similar, except I swept > the strips up the tail. My interior is gray leather like yours, but my > inside window frames are not nearly as nice, did you get new ones or just > refurbish the old ones, beautiful and I know you are proud of it. A > beautiful lady is always an asset, all things considered. > > Don > > > __________ NOD32 1.990 (20050202) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > > __________ NOD32 1.990 (20050202) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "dcm@c-sw.com" <dcm@c-sw.com>
Subject: Jeremy Johnson & FAA Action
Date: Feb 03, 2005
Greetings Group, Wouldn't this make a *great* SouthWest Airlines Ad? You know, where someone finds themselves in an awkward situation -- the punchline is "Do You Ever Just Want To Get Away?". I know I would enjoy it... Kind Regards, David Original Message: ----------------- From: Kerry Johnson kerry(at)kvelectric.com Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:53:23 -0700 Subject: RE: Commander-List: Jeremy Johnson & FAA Action That would be my guess and I'll bet she is wishing the field agent that tattled on Jeremy was a bit less zealous. -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of nico css Subject: Re: Commander-List: Jeremy Johnson & FAA Action --> I guess this is the time Blakely wished this was just a quiet incident, huh? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Lost Pilot?
Date: Feb 03, 2005
Folks, I came across this piece of interesting email just now. Does anyone know anything about this? Nico I have purchased a vertical card compass at an aircraft salvage yard. On the compass is a note which states "this compass is CUSTOM MODIFIED for Mr. Gordon Pugh for his Mooney Mite. All headings are 180 degrees off". I was told by the salvage yard that Mr Pugh modified the compass for use on a flight to the North Pole, and that it would be more (????) accurate reading opposite. I just typed "Gordon Pugh" into Google Search engine, and it returned an article about a Mr. Pugh's Flight to Alaska. It further stated that the Mooney Mite (337M) is missing or unaccounted for. I know where the airplane was and would like to contact Gordon. The Alaska Story had him living in New England, problably New Hampshire. I think he would be about 70 to 75 years of age. My limited search of FAA records doesn't show current pilots certificate. That's about all I know. Can some of you computer geeks find him? Or can anyone forward this to a pilot/Mooney fan/adventurer/etc. who might know him. He doesn't owe me any money, I just think he might enjoy knowing where his airplane is/was located. Sorry, this is not more Rocket related, but thanks for the help. Les Featherston 417-466-4663h or 417-425-3595c Morocketman(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom Fisher" <tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca>
Subject: Re: Lost Pilot?
Date: Feb 03, 2005
I flew a Bell 212 helicopter in the high Arctic in the winter time in the 70's. We used stars and VLF Omega for position information. In the summer when the sum actually made an appearance we took sun shots using our HF radio for GMT reference. I really would like to hear how a magnetic compass would work offset to anything as I was both North and South of the magnetic North pole. Tom F. ----- Original Message ----- From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com> Subject: Commander-List: Lost Pilot? > > Folks, > > I came across this piece of interesting email just now. Does anyone know > anything about this? > > Nico > > > I have purchased a vertical card compass at an aircraft > salvage yard. On the compass is a note which states "this compass is > CUSTOM > MODIFIED for Mr. Gordon Pugh for his Mooney Mite. All headings are 180 > degrees > off". I was told by the salvage yard that Mr Pugh modified the compass for > use on a flight to the North Pole, and that it would be more (????) > accurate > reading opposite. I just typed "Gordon Pugh" into Google Search engine, > and > it returned an article about a Mr. Pugh's Flight to Alaska. It further > stated > that the Mooney Mite (337M) is missing or unaccounted for. I know where > the > airplane was and would like to contact Gordon. The Alaska Story had him > living in New England, problably New Hampshire. I think he would be about > 70 to > 75 years of age. My limited search of FAA records doesn't show current > pilots certificate. That's about all I know. Can some of you computer > geeks > find him? Or can anyone forward this to a pilot/Mooney fan/adventurer/etc. > who > might know him. He doesn't owe me any money, I just think he might enjoy > knowing where his airplane is/was located. Sorry, this is not more Rocket > related, but thanks for the help. > > Les Featherston > 417-466-4663h or 417-425-3595c > > Morocketman(at)aol.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Bow" <bowing74(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Lost Pilot?
Date: Feb 03, 2005
If you used Omega you're lucky to have made it home. What a piece of junk. The worst thing was an instalation where there were two of them. They NEVER agreed. I figured it there was only one, you just wouldn't know whether it was right or not, and would just go on. bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Fisher" <tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca> Subject: Re: Commander-List: Lost Pilot? > > > I flew a Bell 212 helicopter in the high Arctic in the winter time in the > 70's. We used stars and VLF Omega for position information. In the summer > when the sum actually made an appearance we took sun shots using our HF > radio for GMT reference. > I really would like to hear how a magnetic compass would work offset to > anything as I was both North and South of the magnetic North pole. > Tom F. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com> > To: > Subject: Commander-List: Lost Pilot? > > > >> >> Folks, >> >> I came across this piece of interesting email just now. Does anyone know >> anything about this? >> >> Nico >> >> >> I have purchased a vertical card compass at an aircraft >> salvage yard. On the compass is a note which states "this compass is >> CUSTOM >> MODIFIED for Mr. Gordon Pugh for his Mooney Mite. All headings are 180 >> degrees >> off". I was told by the salvage yard that Mr Pugh modified the compass > for >> use on a flight to the North Pole, and that it would be more (????) >> accurate >> reading opposite. I just typed "Gordon Pugh" into Google Search engine, >> and >> it returned an article about a Mr. Pugh's Flight to Alaska. It further >> stated >> that the Mooney Mite (337M) is missing or unaccounted for. I know where >> the >> airplane was and would like to contact Gordon. The Alaska Story had him >> living in New England, problably New Hampshire. I think he would be > about >> 70 to >> 75 years of age. My limited search of FAA records doesn't show current >> pilots certificate. That's about all I know. Can some of you computer >> geeks >> find him? Or can anyone forward this to a pilot/Mooney > fan/adventurer/etc. >> who >> might know him. He doesn't owe me any money, I just think he might >> enjoy >> knowing where his airplane is/was located. Sorry, this is not more > Rocket >> related, but thanks for the help. >> >> Les Featherston >> 417-466-4663h or 417-425-3595c >> >> Morocketman(at)aol.com >> >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 03, 2005
From: Daniel Stewart <dstewart7777(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Props
Matt, I am asking only $9K more for the whole flying plane($45K) then for just the props ($36K). She was last flown in the end of 02. I regulary run the plane up and cycle the props. The plane is flyable and was flown till my anual expiered. The plane had nothing notibly wronge with her and could be annualled or ferry permitted to move her. Engines run well and have high compression tests. All new glass and opening pilot/copilot windows, new exhast all around, rebuilt carb, rebuilt engine mount, surface corrostion was removed and treated, new spin on oil filtration system installed, new interiour 50% complete. Many hydrolic lines replaced. New brake lines and brake pads, New accumulater bladder and filter. Needless to say the last annual in Nov 01 was pretty thorough. I currently have a couple persons dwelling on the plane, so I will give them 2 weeks to decide. If they don't take her then the props are yours. If you are interested in the whole plane, let me know. I have a call in to my mechanic and will let you know the cost of removing/crating the props. Yes, I have 11 top assemblies for $800, each is lubricated and sealed in a 5 gallon bucket with desecant and humitity monitors. They come with complete gasket sets. Yes, my 6 older blades clamps and hubs may have a recurring AD inspection on them. They are tagged "servicable". Regards, Dan "Matthew J. Hawkins" wrote: Dan- That's too bad - a paint job is a easy thing to fix! What were you asking for the whole plane? Just curious. How long has your plane been sitting? You mentioned only 30 hours on the props - just trying to get an idea of when they were last spun around. Just talked with my mechanic and (as you would guess), he'd prefer another mechanic to do the removal. Plus (like you say) he could crate them properly and direct ship them out to our prop shop. Happy to pay for those costs. Could you get an estimate from your mechanic to remove, crate, and ship? Saw in one of your previous e-mails that you're asking $800 each for the cylinder assemblies - that price still good? We may be interested. I take it the 6 original prop blades you mention are the ones with the 250 hr AD? Thanks, Matt -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Stewart [mailto:dstewart7777(at)yahoo.com] Subject: RE: Commander-List: Props The props are still on my 560. Was trying to sell the whole plane, but because the plane needs paint badly, knowone wants to buy it. Would you want me to remove the props or have a mechanic do it. You would need to pay for the mechanics fees. The mechanic could arange direct shippment to your prop shop in PA. We are in Wattsonville CA. Do you know anyone who would want any other part of this 560. I also have 11 rebuilt cylinder assemblies sealled for spares. Dan --------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: Lost Pilot?
Date: Feb 03, 2005
Sounds like the old saying, "a man with one watch knows what time it is. A man with two isn't quite sure." ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Bow" <bowing74(at)earthlink.net> Subject: Re: Commander-List: Lost Pilot? > > If you used Omega you're lucky to have made it home. What a piece of junk. > The worst thing was an instalation where there were two of them. They NEVER > agreed. I figured it there was only one, you just wouldn't know whether it > was right or not, and would just go on. > > bilbo > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Fisher" <tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca> > To: > Subject: Re: Commander-List: Lost Pilot? > > > > > > > > I flew a Bell 212 helicopter in the high Arctic in the winter time in the > > 70's. We used stars and VLF Omega for position information. In the summer > > when the sum actually made an appearance we took sun shots using our HF > > radio for GMT reference. > > I really would like to hear how a magnetic compass would work offset to > > anything as I was both North and South of the magnetic North pole. > > Tom F. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com> > > To: > > Subject: Commander-List: Lost Pilot? > > > > > > > >> > >> Folks, > >> > >> I came across this piece of interesting email just now. Does anyone know > >> anything about this? > >> > >> Nico > >> > >> > >> I have purchased a vertical card compass at an aircraft > >> salvage yard. On the compass is a note which states "this compass is > >> CUSTOM > >> MODIFIED for Mr. Gordon Pugh for his Mooney Mite. All headings are 180 > >> degrees > >> off". I was told by the salvage yard that Mr Pugh modified the compass > > for > >> use on a flight to the North Pole, and that it would be more (????) > >> accurate > >> reading opposite. I just typed "Gordon Pugh" into Google Search engine, > >> and > >> it returned an article about a Mr. Pugh's Flight to Alaska. It further > >> stated > >> that the Mooney Mite (337M) is missing or unaccounted for. I know where > >> the > >> airplane was and would like to contact Gordon. The Alaska Story had him > >> living in New England, problably New Hampshire. I think he would be > > about > >> 70 to > >> 75 years of age. My limited search of FAA records doesn't show current > >> pilots certificate. That's about all I know. Can some of you computer > >> geeks > >> find him? Or can anyone forward this to a pilot/Mooney > > fan/adventurer/etc. > >> who > >> might know him. He doesn't owe me any money, I just think he might > >> enjoy > >> knowing where his airplane is/was located. Sorry, this is not more > > Rocket > >> related, but thanks for the help. > >> > >> Les Featherston > >> 417-466-4663h or 417-425-3595c > >> > >> Morocketman(at)aol.com > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > __________ NOD32 1.990 (20050202) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > > __________ NOD32 1.990 (20050202) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Bow" <bowing74(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Lost Pilot?
Date: Feb 03, 2005
EXACTLY! bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com> Subject: Re: Commander-List: Lost Pilot? > > Sounds like the old saying, "a man with one watch knows what time it is. A > man with two isn't quite sure." > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Bow" <bowing74(at)earthlink.net> > To: > Subject: Re: Commander-List: Lost Pilot? > > >> >> If you used Omega you're lucky to have made it home. What a piece of > junk. >> The worst thing was an instalation where there were two of them. They > NEVER >> agreed. I figured it there was only one, you just wouldn't know whether > it >> was right or not, and would just go on. >> >> bilbo >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Tom Fisher" <tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca> >> To: >> Subject: Re: Commander-List: Lost Pilot? >> >> >> > >> > >> > I flew a Bell 212 helicopter in the high Arctic in the winter time in > the >> > 70's. We used stars and VLF Omega for position information. In the > summer >> > when the sum actually made an appearance we took sun shots using our HF >> > radio for GMT reference. >> > I really would like to hear how a magnetic compass would work offset to >> > anything as I was both North and South of the magnetic North pole. >> > Tom F. >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com> >> > To: >> > Subject: Commander-List: Lost Pilot? >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> Folks, >> >> >> >> I came across this piece of interesting email just now. Does anyone > know >> >> anything about this? >> >> >> >> Nico >> >> >> >> >> >> I have purchased a vertical card compass at an aircraft >> >> salvage yard. On the compass is a note which states "this compass is >> >> CUSTOM >> >> MODIFIED for Mr. Gordon Pugh for his Mooney Mite. All headings are > 180 >> >> degrees >> >> off". I was told by the salvage yard that Mr Pugh modified the > compass >> > for >> >> use on a flight to the North Pole, and that it would be more (????) >> >> accurate >> >> reading opposite. I just typed "Gordon Pugh" into Google Search > engine, >> >> and >> >> it returned an article about a Mr. Pugh's Flight to Alaska. It > further >> >> stated >> >> that the Mooney Mite (337M) is missing or unaccounted for. I know > where >> >> the >> >> airplane was and would like to contact Gordon. The Alaska Story had > him >> >> living in New England, problably New Hampshire. I think he would be >> > about >> >> 70 to >> >> 75 years of age. My limited search of FAA records doesn't show > current >> >> pilots certificate. That's about all I know. Can some of you > computer >> >> geeks >> >> find him? Or can anyone forward this to a pilot/Mooney >> > fan/adventurer/etc. >> >> who >> >> might know him. He doesn't owe me any money, I just think he might >> >> enjoy >> >> knowing where his airplane is/was located. Sorry, this is not more >> > Rocket >> >> related, but thanks for the help. >> >> >> >> Les Featherston >> >> 417-466-4663h or 417-425-3595c >> >> >> >> Morocketman(at)aol.com >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> __________ NOD32 1.990 (20050202) Information __________ >> >> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. >> http://www.nod32.com >> >> >> __________ NOD32 1.990 (20050202) Information __________ >> >> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. >> http://www.nod32.com >> >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom Fisher" <tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca>
Subject: Re: Lost Pilot?
Date: Feb 03, 2005
Not only that, every time we landed or took off the snow crystals from the down wash would wipe out all the signals, it was fun. Tom F. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Bow" <bowing74(at)earthlink.net> Subject: Re: Commander-List: Lost Pilot? > > If you used Omega you're lucky to have made it home. What a piece of junk. > The worst thing was an instalation where there were two of them. They NEVER > agreed. I figured it there was only one, you just wouldn't know whether it > was right or not, and would just go on. > > bilbo > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Fisher" <tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca> > To: > Subject: Re: Commander-List: Lost Pilot? > > > > > > > > I flew a Bell 212 helicopter in the high Arctic in the winter time in the > > 70's. We used stars and VLF Omega for position information. In the summer > > when the sum actually made an appearance we took sun shots using our HF > > radio for GMT reference. > > I really would like to hear how a magnetic compass would work offset to > > anything as I was both North and South of the magnetic North pole. > > Tom F. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com> > > To: > > Subject: Commander-List: Lost Pilot? > > > > > > > >> > >> Folks, > >> > >> I came across this piece of interesting email just now. Does anyone know > >> anything about this? > >> > >> Nico > >> > >> > >> I have purchased a vertical card compass at an aircraft > >> salvage yard. On the compass is a note which states "this compass is > >> CUSTOM > >> MODIFIED for Mr. Gordon Pugh for his Mooney Mite. All headings are 180 > >> degrees > >> off". I was told by the salvage yard that Mr Pugh modified the compass > > for > >> use on a flight to the North Pole, and that it would be more (????) > >> accurate > >> reading opposite. I just typed "Gordon Pugh" into Google Search engine, > >> and > >> it returned an article about a Mr. Pugh's Flight to Alaska. It further > >> stated > >> that the Mooney Mite (337M) is missing or unaccounted for. I know where > >> the > >> airplane was and would like to contact Gordon. The Alaska Story had him > >> living in New England, problably New Hampshire. I think he would be > > about > >> 70 to > >> 75 years of age. My limited search of FAA records doesn't show current > >> pilots certificate. That's about all I know. Can some of you computer > >> geeks > >> find him? Or can anyone forward this to a pilot/Mooney > > fan/adventurer/etc. > >> who > >> might know him. He doesn't owe me any money, I just think he might > >> enjoy > >> knowing where his airplane is/was located. Sorry, this is not more > > Rocket > >> related, but thanks for the help. > >> > >> Les Featherston > >> 417-466-4663h or 417-425-3595c > >> > >> Morocketman(at)aol.com > >> > >> > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 03, 2005
From: Daniel Stewart <dstewart7777(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Aero Commander
Jim, can you accept high res pictures (do you have high speed connection)? Dan JBOBSTER(at)aol.com wrote: I llove to buy airplanes with bad paint...... please send pics to this e-mail address and /or call me! Jim Carroll Seattle WA 206 623 3720 --------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Props
Date: Feb 04, 2005
From: "Matthew J. Hawkins" <hawkins(at)cms.udel.edu>
Dan- Thanks for the info. If your plane sells, what would you want for the 6 blades and hubs? Matt -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Stewart Subject: RE: Commander-List: Props --> Yes, my 6 older blades clamps and hubs may have a recurring AD inspection on them. They are tagged "servicable". Regards, Dan ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Barry Collman" <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: N6291B & N401E
Date: Feb 04, 2005
Hi Steve, As promised, I've now extracted the history of your Model 500 N6291B and the Model 720 N401E from my database and have attached them as .XLS files. Both are ready to be printed out on 'Letter' format paper. With regard to the date suffix letters: "S" - indicates the Bill of Sale date "A" - indicates the Application for Registration date, where the Bill of Sale is undated, or the owner moves to a new location. Unusually, both these Commanders retained their original ex-factory 'N' numbers! With regard to N6291B: (1) - Does anything in the paperwork or log books throw any light on the propellers quoted in August 1983? What props were actually on the aircraft at that time and when were they actually installed? (2) - When were the winglets signed-off as being installed? Kindest Regards, Barry Collman Aero Commander historian (UK) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 04, 2005
From: Daniel Stewart <dstewart7777(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Props
lets say 8K for the lot (blades, hubs and clamps), plus shipping. They are disassembled. Dan "Matthew J. Hawkins" wrote: Dan- Thanks for the info. If your plane sells, what would you want for the 6 blades and hubs? Matt -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Stewart Subject: RE: Commander-List: Props --> Yes, my 6 older blades clamps and hubs may have a recurring AD inspection on them. They are tagged "servicable". Regards, Dan --------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kevin Coons" <kevincoons(at)cavucompanies.net>
Subject: Moe Mills I need to talk with you.
Date: Feb 05, 2005
Moe, I misplaced your cell phone number and I want to give you an update on the crossing. Private email me if you'd like at kevincoons(at)cavucompanies.net or call me at 859-992-6920 to discuss. Kevin Coons -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Barry Collman Subject: Commander-List: N6291B & N401E <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk> Hi Steve, As promised, I've now extracted the history of your Model 500 N6291B and the Model 720 N401E from my database and have attached them as .XLS files. Both are ready to be printed out on 'Letter' format paper. With regard to the date suffix letters: "S" - indicates the Bill of Sale date "A" - indicates the Application for Registration date, where the Bill of Sale is undated, or the owner moves to a new location. Unusually, both these Commanders retained their original ex-factory 'N' numbers! With regard to N6291B: (1) - Does anything in the paperwork or log books throw any light on the propellers quoted in August 1983? What props were actually on the aircraft at that time and when were they actually installed? (2) - When were the winglets signed-off as being installed? Kindest Regards, Barry Collman Aero Commander historian (UK) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: COMMANDER560(at)cs.com
Date: Feb 05, 2005
Subject: Re: N6291B & N401E
Sir Barry, A bit of info for you, I was flying a 680E, N136K, in Lexington, Ky in 1968, right before I went to my airline job, a good friend of mine, Audie Melton flew 401E for Mr. Bull Hancock, of Clairbourne Farm, ie, race horses during the time I was there 2 and one half years, it was highly polished, with yellow and black trim, and a white leather interior, a RCA avq 50 radar, it was a beautiful commander, new engines every 800 hours. Do we know if it is alive now? Regards, Joe Shepherd ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom Fisher" <tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca>
Subject: s/n:1497-15
Date: Feb 05, 2005
Barry, another piece of data for you, the above.......ALL MINE, (well, part of it is the banks). Currently registered as C-GISS, delivery in two weeks. Tom F. ----- Original Message ----- From: <COMMANDER560(at)cs.com> Subject: Re: Commander-List: N6291B & N401E > > Sir Barry, A bit of info for you, I was flying a 680E, N136K, in Lexington, > Ky in 1968, right before I went to my airline job, a good friend of mine, Audie > Melton flew 401E for Mr. Bull Hancock, of Clairbourne Farm, ie, race horses > during the time I was there 2 and one half years, it was highly polished, with > yellow and black trim, and a white leather interior, a RCA avq 50 radar, it > was a beautiful commander, new engines every 800 hours. Do we know if it is > alive now? Regards, Joe Shepherd > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 05, 2005
From: Chris Schuermann <cschuerm(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: s/n:1497-15
>> >>Melton flew 401E ...it was highly polished There used to be two absolutely incredible polished Commander 520s around. Onn was owned by a guy who owned a metal polish company in CA I think. It has gold trim all over. The other was from arizona if I remember correctly and had black trim. Anyone seen those birds lately? Are they owned by TCFG members? On the list? chris ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Wokral" <l.wokral(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: John's "New" Commander
Date: Feb 05, 2005
John, My daughter goes to school at Cal Poly. While I was still living in Bethel Island CA, I used to regularly fly into SLO to visit her in my Cardinal RG. What a wonderful area that it. I've seen your plane on the ramp many times. I can't wait to see the new version in person on my next visit. Do you have it hangared now that you have new paint? Since I sold my Cardinal a couple of months ago, I guess I'll just have to make the flight in my 500B! Tough life. I now live at my place in Darby Montana, so it will be a little longer flight. I just (finally) got all the bugs worked out with the avionics shop in Missoula Montana for all my new avionics. There are just a couple of items left to work out with the Merlyn conversion, then I will finally be able to do some real flying. I, too, need paint and interior. That is why it was fun looking over your photos. That might have to wait for a couple of years though while I rebuild the airplane kitty. Larry Wokral ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com
Date: Feb 05, 2005
Subject: Re: s/n:1497-15
In a message dated 05-Feb-05 09:18:44 Pacific Standard Time, cschuerm(at)cox.net writes: > The other was from arizona if I remember correctly and had black trim. It's been 7+ years, but there was a polished AC-520 with black trim based at Salinas, California (KSNS) for a while, then it migrated to Watsonville (KWVI). I don't get out that way more than once or twice a year now, so don't know if it's still around. Wing Commander Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com
Date: Feb 05, 2005
Subject: Re: She's HOME!
In a message dated 2/2/2005 3:58:05 PM Pacific Standard Time, john(at)vormbaum.com writes: n 10 days later he repeated the trip to get the airplane home for me. THANKS JIM! You are most welcome!! jb ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Dettmer, AIA" <rcdettmer(at)charter.net>
Subject: John's "New" Commander
Date: Feb 05, 2005
Good morning Commanderland, When I hear mention of Cal Poly and SLO, I can't resist chiming in. I came down to SLO in 1967 as a freshman architecture student at Cal Poly...and, never left. Learned to fly in 1975 at SBP, first airplane - a Commanche 250, and now my wonderful 680F parked at the base of the tower. After 37 years, I still pinch myself to remind me what a great place this is to live and work. Anytime you guys are in town, please give me a call to say hello, or leave a note on my airplane. BTW, we now have 3 Commanders on the field - 2-500B's and my 680F...oh yes, and a 690A. Have a great weekend...and happy flying..!! Randy Dettmer 680F/N6253X -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Larry Wokral Subject: Commander-List: John's "New" Commander John, My daughter goes to school at Cal Poly. While I was still living in Bethel Island CA, I used to regularly fly into SLO to visit her in my Cardinal RG. What a wonderful area that it. I've seen your plane on the ramp many times. I can't wait to see the new version in person on my next visit. Do you have it hangared now that you have new paint? Since I sold my Cardinal a couple of months ago, I guess I'll just have to make the flight in my 500B! Tough life. I now live at my place in Darby Montana, so it will be a little longer flight. I just (finally) got all the bugs worked out with the avionics shop in Missoula Montana for all my new avionics. There are just a couple of items left to work out with the Merlyn conversion, then I will finally be able to do some real flying. I, too, need paint and interior. That is why it was fun looking over your photos. That might have to wait for a couple of years though while I rebuild the airplane kitty. Larry Wokral ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 05, 2005
From: Chris Schuermann <cschuerm(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: s/n:1497-15
CloudCraft(at)aol.com wrote: > It's been 7+ years, but there was a polished AC-520 with black trim based at > Salinas, California (KSNS) for a while, then it migrated to Watsonville > (KWVI). Thanks Keith. At one time (even before you introduced Barry to me), I was well on my way to collecting a picture of every bathtub Commander. I've been digging back through my email archives and found a fuzzy picture of the one I was thinking of. It's N2600B and (as of 7 years ago), was owned by a Jeff Griffon. He mentioned that he'd moved from CA to AZ. The really beautiful one with the 24kt gold trim was N19KD and was at Corona, CA as of 3 years ago. Owned by a Gregory Barry. I'm having a lot of fun digging back through the thousands of emails people have sent me. Gives me a great opportunity to poke a bit of fun at Mr Vormbaum though.... from 5 years ago to the day: ============== "Chris, You might remember me, I tried to rescue an old 560A(HC) that was slowly dissolving on Catalina Island Incidentally, I'm going to send you some pictures shortly, when the paint's finished. I finally did purchase a 1962 500-B, s/n 1230. I feel like a kid on Christmas day.... Best regards, John " ==================== Hey John - that paint job took longer than expected??? :-) Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RRamm52(at)cs.com
Date: Feb 05, 2005
Subject: Re: N6291B & N401E
In a message dated 2/5/2005 9:44:32 AM Central Standard Time, COMMANDER560(at)cs.com writes: > Sir Barry, A bit of info for you, I was flying a 680E, N136K, in Lexington, > > Ky in 1968, right before I went to my airline job, a good friend of mine, > Audie > Melton flew 401E for Mr. Bull Hancock, of Clairbourne Farm, ie, race horses > during the time I was there 2 and one half years, it was highly polished, > with > yellow and black trim, and a white leather interior, a RCA avq 50 radar, it > was a beautiful commander, new engines every 800 hours. Do we know if it is > alive now? Regards, Joe Shepherd Joe, I applied that paint and polish and interior, and am still on the U.S. registry as half owner of 401E. Unfortunately, she was parted out in the mid 90's in california.....Rob Munro N6291B ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Barry Collman" <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: Re: N6291B & N401E
Date: Feb 05, 2005
Hi Joe, I see that N401E was sold to Mr A B Hancock Jr., of Paris, Kentucky on November 19th 1964, so assume this is the 'Bull' Hancock you refer to. It was last noted in September 1995 with Desert Aircraft Salvage, in Artesia, New Mexico. Thanks for the info, which was most welcome. Are you able to recall whether it had a nose radome with the RCA AVQ-50 radar? Lastly, I don't suppose you have a photo of t, do you? Kindest Regards, Barry ----- Original Message ----- From: <COMMANDER560(at)cs.com> Subject: Re: Commander-List: N6291B & N401E | | Sir Barry, A bit of info for you, I was flying a 680E, N136K, in Lexington, | Ky in 1968, right before I went to my airline job. A good friend of mine, Audie | Melton flew 401E for Mr. Bull Hancock, of Clairbourne Farm, ie, race horses | during the time I was there 2 and one half years. It was highly polished, with | yellow and black trim, and a white leather interior, a RCA avq 50 radar, it | was a beautiful commander, new engines every 800 hours. Do we know if it is | alive now? Regards, Joe Shepherd | | | | | | | ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Barry Collman" <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: Re: s/n:1497-15
Date: Feb 05, 2005
Hi Tom, Nice one! I'm so pleased you managed to get what you set out to get some while ago. A 680FLP with the MR. RPM modification. Well done Sir! Could it well appear in California next September? Kindest Regards, Barry ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Fisher" <tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca> Subject: Commander-List: s/n:1497-15 | | Barry, another piece of data for you, the above.......ALL MINE, (well, part | of it is the banks). | Currently registered as C-GISS, delivery in two weeks. | Tom F. | | ----- Original Message ----- | From: <COMMANDER560(at)cs.com> | To: | Subject: Re: Commander-List: N6291B & N401E | | | > | > Sir Barry, A bit of info for you, I was flying a 680E, N136K, in | Lexington, | > Ky in 1968, right before I went to my airline job, a good friend of mine, | Audie | > Melton flew 401E for Mr. Bull Hancock, of Clairbourne Farm, ie, race | horses | > during the time I was there 2 and one half years, it was highly polished, | with | > yellow and black trim, and a white leather interior, a RCA avq 50 radar, | it | > was a beautiful commander, new engines every 800 hours. Do we know if it | is | > alive now? Regards, Joe Shepherd | > | > | | | | | | | ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom Fisher" <tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca>
Subject: Re: s/n:1497-15
Date: Feb 05, 2005
If the $$ support the trip it's a date. Tom F. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barry Collman" <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk> Subject: Re: Commander-List: s/n:1497-15 <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk> > > Hi Tom, > > Nice one! > > I'm so pleased you managed to get what you set out to get some while ago. A > 680FLP with the MR. RPM modification. > > Well done Sir! > > Could it well appear in California next September? > > Kindest Regards, > Barry > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Fisher" <tfisher(at)commandergroup.bc.ca> > To: > Subject: Commander-List: s/n:1497-15 > > > > | > | Barry, another piece of data for you, the above.......ALL MINE, (well, part > | of it is the banks). > | Currently registered as C-GISS, delivery in two weeks. > | Tom F. > | > | ----- Original Message ----- > | From: <COMMANDER560(at)cs.com> > | To: > | Subject: Re: Commander-List: N6291B & N401E > | > | > | > > | > Sir Barry, A bit of info for you, I was flying a 680E, N136K, in > | Lexington, > | > Ky in 1968, right before I went to my airline job, a good friend of mine, > | Audie > | > Melton flew 401E for Mr. Bull Hancock, of Clairbourne Farm, ie, race > | horses > | > during the time I was there 2 and one half years, it was highly polished, > | with > | > yellow and black trim, and a white leather interior, a RCA avq 50 radar, > | it > | > was a beautiful commander, new engines every 800 hours. Do we know if it > | is > | > alive now? Regards, Joe Shepherd > | > > | > > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RRamm52(at)cs.com
Date: Feb 05, 2005
Subject: Re: N6291B & N401E/photo
In a message dated 2/5/2005 2:05:50 PM Central Standard Time, barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk writes: > Thanks for the info, which was most welcome. Are you able to recall whether > it > had a nose radome with the RCA AVQ-50 radar? > > Lastly, I don't suppose you have a photo of t, do you? > > Kindest Regards, > Barry Hi, Barry When I get back next week, I'll send you a photo of her after I painted her in Virginia in 1982..........she had the radar nose. Rob Munro ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Fw: Commander Junkyard
Date: Feb 05, 2005
Can anyone help Peter with this? Thanks Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Hawkins" <PeterHawkins(at)greeneking.co.uk> Subject: Commander Junkyard > Dear Nico, > > I hope you don't mind me getting in touch but I have been trying to research > the crash of Aero Commander N6362U in Greenland on 14/08/1967 and found your > email "Commander Junkyard"on the internet. My grandfather Raymond Hawkins > was the pilot of N6362U on that day and is still with the aircraft, the > other members of the crew were rescued. > > Have you any information or contacts that could help me understand what > happened, who the other members of the crew were, the location of the > aircraft? > > Kind Regards, > > Peter Hawkins > > > ********************************************************************** > The contents of this E Mail message are confidential as between the sender and the named recipient, and may be legally privileged. Any person receiving this E Mail message not being the named recipient is prohibited from using the contents for any purpose other than to pass it to the named recipient without copying, disclosing or disseminating the contents in any way other than with the express consent of the named recipient. Greene King reserves the right to monitor any and all E Mail communications using any part of its Network. > > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by > MIMEsweeper/Sophos for the presence of computer viruses. > ********************************************************************** > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: COMMANDER560(at)cs.com
Date: Feb 05, 2005
Subject: Re: N401E
Barry, No, I do not have a photo, wish I had one as I was good friends with Audie Melton, the pilot. He passed a few years ago, the nose had that radome that had the snout look, forget what they called that one. Talk to you later. Joe ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: s/n:1497-15
Date: Feb 05, 2005
OUch! Yeah, I guess it took a little longer than expected ;-). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Schuermann" <cschuerm(at)cox.net> Subject: Re: Commander-List: s/n:1497-15 > > > CloudCraft(at)aol.com wrote: > > It's been 7+ years, but there was a polished AC-520 with black trim based at > > Salinas, California (KSNS) for a while, then it migrated to Watsonville > > (KWVI). > > Thanks Keith. At one time (even before you introduced Barry to me), I > was well on my way to collecting a picture of every bathtub Commander. > I've been digging back through my email archives and found a fuzzy > picture of the one I was thinking of. It's N2600B and (as of 7 years > ago), was owned by a Jeff Griffon. He mentioned that he'd moved from CA > to AZ. > > The really beautiful one with the 24kt gold trim was N19KD and was at > Corona, CA as of 3 years ago. Owned by a Gregory Barry. > > I'm having a lot of fun digging back through the thousands of emails > people have sent me. Gives me a great opportunity to poke a bit of fun > at Mr Vormbaum though.... from 5 years ago to the day: > > ============== > "Chris, > > You might remember me, I tried to rescue an old 560A(HC) that was slowly > dissolving on Catalina Island > > Incidentally, I'm going to send you some pictures shortly, when the > paint's finished. I finally did purchase a 1962 500-B, s/n 1230. I feel > like a kid on Christmas day.... > > Best regards, > > John > " > ==================== > > > Hey John - that paint job took longer than expected??? :-) > > Chris > > > __________ NOD32 1.991 (20050203) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > > __________ NOD32 1.991 (20050203) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Barry Collman" <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Fw: Commander Junkyard
Date: Feb 06, 2005
Hi All, Peter has contacted me regarding N6362U. The accident report was prepared under the jurisdiction of the Danish Government and I'm trying to obtain a copy of it through Air-Britain's Specialist on aviation in that country. Best Regards, Barry C. ----- Original Message ----- From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com> Subject: Commander-List: Fw: Commander Junkyard | | Can anyone help Peter with this? | Thanks | Nico | | | ----- Original Message ----- | From: "Peter Hawkins" <PeterHawkins(at)greeneking.co.uk> | To: | Subject: Commander Junkyard | | | > Dear Nico, | > | > I hope you don't mind me getting in touch but I have been trying to | research | > the crash of Aero Commander N6362U in Greenland on 14/08/1967 and found | your | > email "Commander Junkyard"on the internet. My grandfather Raymond | Hawkins | > was the pilot of N6362U on that day and is still with the aircraft, the | > other members of the crew were rescued. | > | > Have you any information or contacts that could help me understand what | > happened, who the other members of the crew were, the location of the | > aircraft? | > | > Kind Regards, | > | > Peter Hawkins | > | > | > ********************************************************************** | > The contents of this E Mail message are confidential as between the sender | and the named recipient, and may be legally privileged. Any person | receiving this E Mail message not being the named recipient is prohibited | from using the contents for any purpose other than to pass it to the named | recipient without copying, disclosing or disseminating the contents in any | way other than with the express consent of the named recipient. Greene King | reserves the right to monitor any and all E Mail communications using any | part of its Network. | > | > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by | > MIMEsweeper/Sophos for the presence of computer viruses. | > ********************************************************************** | > | | | | | | | ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Barry Collman" <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: Re: N6291B & N401E/photo
Date: Feb 06, 2005
Thanks Rob! I haven't got any photographic coverage of N401E at all, so a copy will be of great interest. Very Best Regards, Barry ----- Original Message ----- From: <RRamm52(at)cs.com> Subject: Re: Commander-List: N6291B & N401E/photo | | In a message dated 2/5/2005 2:05:50 PM Central Standard Time, | barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk writes: | > Thanks for the info, which was most welcome. Are you able to recall whether | > it | > had a nose radome with the RCA AVQ-50 radar? | > | > Lastly, I don't suppose you have a photo of t, do you? | > | > Kindest Regards, | > Barry | Hi, Barry | When I get back next week, I'll send you a photo of her after I painted her | in Virginia in 1982..........she had the radar nose. | Rob Munro | | | | | | | ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Wokral" <l.wokral(at)ix.netcom.com>
"Commander e-mail list" , "Craig Lundborg"
Subject: RE: Avionics
Date: Feb 06, 2005
>Wow Larry, All I know is that when your airplane is done, it's going to be one of the finest examples of a piston commander. What did you put in your panel? I need to do avionics next, I was thinking Garmin GNS480 (CNX80) plus the MX20 MFD...> Yup John, that's what I would suggest. I put in a new CNX80; MX20 with Chart View and terrain options; Garmin GTX330 S mode transponder with TIS to the MX20; Shadin Digidata fuel flow/air data computer that cross feeds air data info to the CNX80 (approved as primary replacement for the stock fuel flow gauge during the Merlyn 320 conversion); PS Engineering 7000B audio panel w/seven place stereo intercom (with cell phone connect, dual stereo audio inputs that can be switched or shared from front seats and back; PS Engineering PXE7300 CD/MP3/AM&FM player; a four receptacle 28 to 12V converter mounted at the rear table and one receptacle at the copilot's lower panel (I have a small 12V to 115V inverter that can plug into any of these for laptops, coolers, etc.); Electronics International volt/amp, MP, RPM, and dual CHT gauges as primary replacements; and two JPI EDM800 engine scanners with all available scanning options (all CHTs, all EGTs, TIT, IAT, OAT, fuel flow, volt/amps). I already had and reused a King HSI, a 1000E Stormscope, and a KX155 as the secondary radio. We built a new center panel section. The MX20, CNX80, and GTX330 are mounted in a stack on the left half. This was considered to be within the normal IFR scan, so no separate "within scan" enunciators were required. The PS Eng 7000B, PXE7300, and KX155 are mounted immediately to the right of those in another stack. The Shadin, Stormscope, and JPIs are lined up vertically to the right of those with the two 3-in-one gauges and the E.I. dual CHT gauge horizontally below them. The MP, RPM, and volt/amp gauges are in a horizontal row of six in a small, extended sub panel running across the top just under the glare shield. While we were at it, I put in an Electro luminescent light strip under the glare shield that is wired to the main bus and has a battery backup. I also put Electro Luminescent light rings around all instruments and gauges that weren't already internally lighted. As a backup, I left in the existing post lights too. For now, I left the copilot's panel alone. It has a new A.I., older T&B, older VSI, and older DG. Some of these still have the older brow lights as does the flap and trim indicators. We installed Bose's buss powered jack for my headset. We also prewired the main harness for the XM/WX audio entertainment & weather links where the weather will be displayed on the MX20. It's pretty hard to imagine all of this without a photo. I need to take some. There were a lot of complications encountered during the installation. A lot of old wiring behind the panel was removed and replaced with a new harness designed for this particular installation. Many of these components are long, leaving little clearance in the back - another reason for a formed custom harness. Instead of in-line fuses for the additional gauges etc. as is suggested by the manufacturers, we made a small new sub panel and attached it just below the existing avionics bus so that an additional row of pullable circuit breakers could be installed. Where ever possible, we wired through existing cannon plugs for easier future maintenance. Because the amperage load is now substantially higher (easily handled by the two 70 amp alternators included with the Merlyn 320 conversion), we had to run a larger feed wire from the new Zefftronics Alternator Controller/Voltage Regulator too. I've spent lots of bucks over the last couple of years for the Merlyn 320 conversion, the new built in altitude compensating oxygen system (dual 115 cf Kevlar bottles mounted aft of the extended baggage area on the starboard side opposite the battery), and the avionics installation. Now I'm broke, eating chicken pot pies for dinner, and can't afford avgas. The plane still needs paint - I'll just have to keep it waxed up for now. The interior is in OK shape, but it is in an older style and not up to what the plane deserves. I still need to refinish and re-label the overhead panel and the quadrant. When I bought the plane, it already had the dual pane cabin windows, flap gap seals, the Shrike nose, stinger tail cone, the square rudder cap, eyebrow windows, and the frameless vent windows. During the Merlyn conversion, we certified the extended baggage area (I previously had no paperwork showing its installation) as an additional 150 lb. "light weight" area. The other things I'd still like to do include installing winglets with tip strobes, new paint, leather interior refurbishment (with window and crew/cabin separation curtains), make a new small drawered "entertainment center" cabinet that could be placed between the copilot seat and the aft facing one behind it, exchange the rear bench seat for one that has the droppable center armrest, and install deicing boots (or maybe even a TKS system - don't need known ice, but good deicing or anti-icing would be good). The new "compact" propellers already have the hot prop kit. I'm also considering Merlyn's fuel increase system that allows an extra 70 gallons with their additional gross weight increase to 7,400 lbs. (fuel weight only to be added to the present allowed gross weight of 7200 lbs.). This increase would put the plane back into the 1,000 mile IFR range. It would also be nice to replace the present Century III autopilot with a new digital roll steering type like the S-TEC. Keep dreaming I guess! Sure, I've spent more money on this plane than I could ever expect to get back from a sale (and there's more to spend). I guess a way to rationalize this is by contemplating what other plane could do what this one can: with the short field performance and safety designed in by Mr. Smith, with the added performance of the Merlyn conversion, with the great sleek look of an Aerocommander, and at what purchase price. A pressurized turboprop would be nice, but the cost to operate one is out of my budget. This one will now cruise at 200 KTAS (75% power @ about 34 gph); has good climb ability (I just did a high performance takeoff with just me and 70 gallons of fuel (cool air has the capability of flying to 25,000'; and has a single engine service ceiling of 16,000'. I'm jazzed! Sorry I got so involved. Several people wanted to know what was installed, so I though I would try to be complete and answer all at the same time. Larry Wokral ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Bow" <bowing74(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: RE: Avionics
Date: Feb 06, 2005
I've learned to enjoy chicken pot pies and have found a grilled cheese sandwich is a nice change for about the same price. It all turns into the same thing anyway. bilbo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Wokral" <l.wokral(at)ix.netcom.com> ; "Craig Lundborg" Subject: Commander-List: RE: Avionics > > >>Wow Larry, > > All I know is that when your airplane is done, it's going to be one of the > finest examples of a piston commander. > > What did you put in your panel? I need to do avionics next, I was thinking > Garmin GNS480 (CNX80) plus the MX20 > MFD...> > > Yup John, that's what I would suggest. > > I put in a new CNX80; MX20 with Chart View and terrain options; Garmin > GTX330 S mode transponder with TIS to the MX20; Shadin Digidata fuel > flow/air data computer that cross feeds air data info to the CNX80 > (approved > as primary replacement for the stock fuel flow gauge during the Merlyn 320 > conversion); PS Engineering 7000B audio panel w/seven place stereo > intercom > (with cell phone connect, dual stereo audio inputs that can be switched or > shared from front seats and back; PS Engineering PXE7300 CD/MP3/AM&FM > player; a four receptacle 28 to 12V converter mounted at the rear table > and > one receptacle at the copilot's lower panel (I have a small 12V to 115V > inverter that can plug into any of these for laptops, coolers, etc.); > Electronics International volt/amp, MP, RPM, and dual CHT gauges as > primary > replacements; and two JPI EDM800 engine scanners with all available > scanning > options (all CHTs, all EGTs, TIT, IAT, OAT, fuel flow, volt/amps). I > already > had and reused a King HSI, a 1000E Stormscope, and a KX155 as the > secondary > radio. We built a new center panel section. The MX20, CNX80, and GTX330 > are > mounted in a stack on the left half. This was considered to be within the > normal IFR scan, so no separate "within scan" enunciators were required. > The > PS Eng 7000B, PXE7300, and KX155 are mounted immediately to the right of > those in another stack. The Shadin, Stormscope, and JPIs are lined up > vertically to the right of those with the two 3-in-one gauges and the E.I. > dual CHT gauge horizontally below them. The MP, RPM, and volt/amp gauges > are > in a horizontal row of six in a small, extended sub panel running across > the > top just under the glare shield. While we were at it, I put in an Electro > luminescent light strip under the glare shield that is wired to the main > bus > and has a battery backup. I also put Electro Luminescent light rings > around > all instruments and gauges that weren't already internally lighted. As a > backup, I left in the existing post lights too. For now, I left the > copilot's panel alone. It has a new A.I., older T&B, older VSI, and older > DG. Some of these still have the older brow lights as does the flap and > trim > indicators. We installed Bose's buss powered jack for my headset. We also > prewired the main harness for the XM/WX audio entertainment & weather > links > where the weather will be displayed on the MX20. It's pretty hard to > imagine > all of this without a photo. I need to take some. > > There were a lot of complications encountered during the installation. A > lot > of old wiring behind the panel was removed and replaced with a new harness > designed for this particular installation. Many of these components are > long, leaving little clearance in the back - another reason for a formed > custom harness. Instead of in-line fuses for the additional gauges etc. as > is suggested by the manufacturers, we made a small new sub panel and > attached it just below the existing avionics bus so that an additional row > of pullable circuit breakers could be installed. Where ever possible, we > wired through existing cannon plugs for easier future maintenance. Because > the amperage load is now substantially higher (easily handled by the two > 70 > amp alternators included with the Merlyn 320 conversion), we had to run a > larger feed wire from the new Zefftronics Alternator Controller/Voltage > Regulator too. > > I've spent lots of bucks over the last couple of years for the Merlyn 320 > conversion, the new built in altitude compensating oxygen system (dual 115 > cf Kevlar bottles mounted aft of the extended baggage area on the > starboard > side opposite the battery), and the avionics installation. Now I'm broke, > eating chicken pot pies for dinner, and can't afford avgas. > > The plane still needs paint - I'll just have to keep it waxed up for now. > The interior is in OK shape, but it is in an older style and not up to > what > the plane deserves. I still need to refinish and re-label the overhead > panel > and the quadrant. When I bought the plane, it already had the dual pane > cabin windows, flap gap seals, the Shrike nose, stinger tail cone, the > square rudder cap, eyebrow windows, and the frameless vent windows. During > the Merlyn conversion, we certified the extended baggage area (I > previously > had no paperwork showing its installation) as an additional 150 lb. "light > weight" area. > > The other things I'd still like to do include installing winglets with tip > strobes, new paint, leather interior refurbishment (with window and > crew/cabin separation curtains), make a new small drawered "entertainment > center" cabinet that could be placed between the copilot seat and the aft > facing one behind it, exchange the rear bench seat for one that has the > droppable center armrest, and install deicing boots (or maybe even a TKS > system - don't need known ice, but good deicing or anti-icing would be > good). The new "compact" propellers already have the hot prop kit. I'm > also > considering Merlyn's fuel increase system that allows an extra 70 gallons > with their additional gross weight increase to 7,400 lbs. (fuel weight > only > to be added to the present allowed gross weight of 7200 lbs.). This > increase > would put the plane back into the 1,000 mile IFR range. It would also be > nice to replace the present Century III autopilot with a new digital roll > steering type like the S-TEC. Keep dreaming I guess! > > Sure, I've spent more money on this plane than I could ever expect to get > back from a sale (and there's more to spend). I guess a way to rationalize > this is by contemplating what other plane could do what this one can: with > the short field performance and safety designed in by Mr. Smith, with the > added performance of the Merlyn conversion, with the great sleek look of > an > Aerocommander, and at what purchase price. A pressurized turboprop would > be > nice, but the cost to operate one is out of my budget. This one will now > cruise at 200 KTAS (75% power @ about 34 gph); has good climb ability (I > just did a high performance takeoff with just me and 70 gallons of fuel > (cool air has the > capability of flying to 25,000'; and has a single engine service ceiling > of > 16,000'. I'm jazzed! > > Sorry I got so involved. Several people wanted to know what was installed, > so I though I would try to be complete and answer all at the same time. > > Larry Wokral > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: RE: Avionics
Date: Feb 06, 2005
From: "Alan Kucheck" <Alan.Kucheck(at)borland.com>
Larry: Can you post [or send] some photos of your new panel? I'm going to be moving some things around at some point and would like to see what worked for you. thanks, Alan -----Original Message----- From: Larry Wokral [mailto:l.wokral(at)ix.netcom.com] Subject: Commander-List: RE: Avionics >Wow Larry, All I know is that when your airplane is done, it's going to be one of the finest examples of a piston commander. What did you put in your panel? I need to do avionics next, I was thinking Garmin GNS480 (CNX80) plus the MX20 MFD...> Yup John, that's what I would suggest. I put in a new CNX80; MX20 with Chart View and terrain options; Garmin GTX330 S mode transponder with TIS to the MX20; Shadin Digidata fuel flow/air data computer that cross feeds air data info to the CNX80 (approved as primary replacement for the stock fuel flow gauge during the Merlyn 320 conversion); PS Engineering 7000B audio panel w/seven place stereo intercom (with cell phone connect, dual stereo audio inputs that can be switched or shared from front seats and back; PS Engineering PXE7300 CD/MP3/AM&FM player; a four receptacle 28 to 12V converter mounted at the rear table and one receptacle at the copilot's lower panel (I have a small 12V to 115V inverter that can plug into any of these for laptops, coolers, etc.); Electronics International volt/amp, MP, RPM, and dual CHT gauges as primary replacements; and two JPI EDM800 engine scanners with all available scanning options (all CHTs, all EGTs, TIT, IAT, OAT, fuel flow, volt/amps). I already had and reused a King HSI, a 1000E Stormscope, and a KX155 as the secondary radio. We built a new center panel section. The MX20, CNX80, and GTX330 are mounted in a stack on the left half. This was considered to be within the normal IFR scan, so no separate "within scan" enunciators were required. The PS Eng 7000B, PXE7300, and KX155 are mounted immediately to the right of those in another stack. The Shadin, Stormscope, and JPIs are lined up vertically to the right of those with the two 3-in-one gauges and the E.I. dual CHT gauge horizontally below them. The MP, RPM, and volt/amp gauges are in a horizontal row of six in a small, extended sub panel running across the top just under the glare shield. While we were at it, I put in an Electro luminescent light strip under the glare shield that is wired to the main bus and has a battery backup. I also put Electro Luminescent light rings around all instruments and gauges that weren't already internally lighted. As a backup, I left in the existing post lights too. For now, I left the copilot's panel alone. It has a new A.I., older T&B, older VSI, and older DG. Some of these still have the older brow lights as does the flap and trim indicators. We installed Bose's buss powered jack for my headset. We also prewired the main harness for the XM/WX audio entertainment & weather links where the weather will be displayed on the MX20. It's pretty hard to imagine all of this without a photo. I need to take some. There were a lot of complications encountered during the installation. A lot of old wiring behind the panel was removed and replaced with a new harness designed for this particular installation. Many of these components are long, leaving little clearance in the back - another reason for a formed custom harness. Instead of in-line fuses for the additional gauges etc. as is suggested by the manufacturers, we made a small new sub panel and attached it just below the existing avionics bus so that an additional row of pullable circuit breakers could be installed. Where ever possible, we wired through existing cannon plugs for easier future maintenance. Because the amperage load is now substantially higher (easily handled by the two 70 amp alternators included with the Merlyn 320 conversion), we had to run a larger feed wire from the new Zefftronics Alternator Controller/Voltage Regulator too. I've spent lots of bucks over the last couple of years for the Merlyn 320 conversion, the new built in altitude compensating oxygen system (dual 115 cf Kevlar bottles mounted aft of the extended baggage area on the starboard side opposite the battery), and the avionics installation. Now I'm broke, eating chicken pot pies for dinner, and can't afford avgas. The plane still needs paint - I'll just have to keep it waxed up for now. The interior is in OK shape, but it is in an older style and not up to what the plane deserves. I still need to refinish and re-label the overhead panel and the quadrant. When I bought the plane, it already had the dual pane cabin windows, flap gap seals, the Shrike nose, stinger tail cone, the square rudder cap, eyebrow windows, and the frameless vent windows. During the Merlyn conversion, we certified the extended baggage area (I previously had no paperwork showing its installation) as an additional 150 lb. "light weight" area. The other things I'd still like to do include installing winglets with tip strobes, new paint, leather interior refurbishment (with window and crew/cabin separation curtains), make a new small drawered "entertainment center" cabinet that could be placed between the copilot seat and the aft facing one behind it, exchange the rear bench seat for one that has the droppable center armrest, and install deicing boots (or maybe even a TKS system - don't need known ice, but good deicing or anti-icing would be good). The new "compact" propellers already have the hot prop kit. I'm also considering Merlyn's fuel increase system that allows an extra 70 gallons with their additional gross weight increase to 7,400 lbs. (fuel weight only to be added to the present allowed gross weight of 7200 lbs.). This increase would put the plane back into the 1,000 mile IFR range. It would also be nice to replace the present Century III autopilot with a new digital roll steering type like the S-TEC. Keep dreaming I guess! Sure, I've spent more money on this plane than I could ever expect to get back from a sale (and there's more to spend). I guess a way to rationalize this is by contemplating what other plane could do what this one can: with the short field performance and safety designed in by Mr. Smith, with the added performance of the Merlyn conversion, with the great sleek look of an Aerocommander, and at what purchase price. A pressurized turboprop would be nice, but the cost to operate one is out of my budget. This one will now cruise at 200 KTAS (75% power @ about 34 gph); has good climb ability (I just did a high performance takeoff with just me and 70 gallons of fuel (cool air has the capability of flying to 25,000'; and has a single engine service ceiling of 16,000'. I'm jazzed! Sorry I got so involved. Several people wanted to know what was installed, so I though I would try to be complete and answer all at the same time. Larry Wokral ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: RE: Avionics
Date: Feb 06, 2005
The problem is having caviar taste on a grilled cheese diet... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Bow" <bowing74(at)earthlink.net> Subject: Re: Commander-List: RE: Avionics > > I've learned to enjoy chicken pot pies and have found a grilled cheese > sandwich is a nice change for about the same price. It all turns into the > same thing anyway. > > bilbo > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Larry Wokral" <l.wokral(at)ix.netcom.com> > To: ; "Commander e-mail list" > ; "Craig Lundborg" > Subject: Commander-List: RE: Avionics > > > > > > > >>Wow Larry, > > > > All I know is that when your airplane is done, it's going to be one of the > > finest examples of a piston commander. > > > > What did you put in your panel? I need to do avionics next, I was thinking > > Garmin GNS480 (CNX80) plus the MX20 > > MFD...> > > > > Yup John, that's what I would suggest. > > > > I put in a new CNX80; MX20 with Chart View and terrain options; Garmin > > GTX330 S mode transponder with TIS to the MX20; Shadin Digidata fuel > > flow/air data computer that cross feeds air data info to the CNX80 > > (approved > > as primary replacement for the stock fuel flow gauge during the Merlyn 320 > > conversion); PS Engineering 7000B audio panel w/seven place stereo > > intercom > > (with cell phone connect, dual stereo audio inputs that can be switched or > > shared from front seats and back; PS Engineering PXE7300 CD/MP3/AM&FM > > player; a four receptacle 28 to 12V converter mounted at the rear table > > and > > one receptacle at the copilot's lower panel (I have a small 12V to 115V > > inverter that can plug into any of these for laptops, coolers, etc.); > > Electronics International volt/amp, MP, RPM, and dual CHT gauges as > > primary > > replacements; and two JPI EDM800 engine scanners with all available > > scanning > > options (all CHTs, all EGTs, TIT, IAT, OAT, fuel flow, volt/amps). I > > already > > had and reused a King HSI, a 1000E Stormscope, and a KX155 as the > > secondary > > radio. We built a new center panel section. The MX20, CNX80, and GTX330 > > are > > mounted in a stack on the left half. This was considered to be within the > > normal IFR scan, so no separate "within scan" enunciators were required. > > The > > PS Eng 7000B, PXE7300, and KX155 are mounted immediately to the right of > > those in another stack. The Shadin, Stormscope, and JPIs are lined up > > vertically to the right of those with the two 3-in-one gauges and the E.I. > > dual CHT gauge horizontally below them. The MP, RPM, and volt/amp gauges > > are > > in a horizontal row of six in a small, extended sub panel running across > > the > > top just under the glare shield. While we were at it, I put in an Electro > > luminescent light strip under the glare shield that is wired to the main > > bus > > and has a battery backup. I also put Electro Luminescent light rings > > around > > all instruments and gauges that weren't already internally lighted. As a > > backup, I left in the existing post lights too. For now, I left the > > copilot's panel alone. It has a new A.I., older T&B, older VSI, and older > > DG. Some of these still have the older brow lights as does the flap and > > trim > > indicators. We installed Bose's buss powered jack for my headset. We also > > prewired the main harness for the XM/WX audio entertainment & weather > > links > > where the weather will be displayed on the MX20. It's pretty hard to > > imagine > > all of this without a photo. I need to take some. > > > > There were a lot of complications encountered during the installation. A > > lot > > of old wiring behind the panel was removed and replaced with a new harness > > designed for this particular installation. Many of these components are > > long, leaving little clearance in the back - another reason for a formed > > custom harness. Instead of in-line fuses for the additional gauges etc. as > > is suggested by the manufacturers, we made a small new sub panel and > > attached it just below the existing avionics bus so that an additional row > > of pullable circuit breakers could be installed. Where ever possible, we > > wired through existing cannon plugs for easier future maintenance. Because > > the amperage load is now substantially higher (easily handled by the two > > 70 > > amp alternators included with the Merlyn 320 conversion), we had to run a > > larger feed wire from the new Zefftronics Alternator Controller/Voltage > > Regulator too. > > > > I've spent lots of bucks over the last couple of years for the Merlyn 320 > > conversion, the new built in altitude compensating oxygen system (dual 115 > > cf Kevlar bottles mounted aft of the extended baggage area on the > > starboard > > side opposite the battery), and the avionics installation. Now I'm broke, > > eating chicken pot pies for dinner, and can't afford avgas. > > > > The plane still needs paint - I'll just have to keep it waxed up for now. > > The interior is in OK shape, but it is in an older style and not up to > > what > > the plane deserves. I still need to refinish and re-label the overhead > > panel > > and the quadrant. When I bought the plane, it already had the dual pane > > cabin windows, flap gap seals, the Shrike nose, stinger tail cone, the > > square rudder cap, eyebrow windows, and the frameless vent windows. During > > the Merlyn conversion, we certified the extended baggage area (I > > previously > > had no paperwork showing its installation) as an additional 150 lb. "light > > weight" area. > > > > The other things I'd still like to do include installing winglets with tip > > strobes, new paint, leather interior refurbishment (with window and > > crew/cabin separation curtains), make a new small drawered "entertainment > > center" cabinet that could be placed between the copilot seat and the aft > > facing one behind it, exchange the rear bench seat for one that has the > > droppable center armrest, and install deicing boots (or maybe even a TKS > > system - don't need known ice, but good deicing or anti-icing would be > > good). The new "compact" propellers already have the hot prop kit. I'm > > also > > considering Merlyn's fuel increase system that allows an extra 70 gallons > > with their additional gross weight increase to 7,400 lbs. (fuel weight > > only > > to be added to the present allowed gross weight of 7200 lbs.). This > > increase > > would put the plane back into the 1,000 mile IFR range. It would also be > > nice to replace the present Century III autopilot with a new digital roll > > steering type like the S-TEC. Keep dreaming I guess! > > > > Sure, I've spent more money on this plane than I could ever expect to get > > back from a sale (and there's more to spend). I guess a way to rationalize > > this is by contemplating what other plane could do what this one can: with > > the short field performance and safety designed in by Mr. Smith, with the > > added performance of the Merlyn conversion, with the great sleek look of > > an > > Aerocommander, and at what purchase price. A pressurized turboprop would > > be > > nice, but the cost to operate one is out of my budget. This one will now > > cruise at 200 KTAS (75% power @ about 34 gph); has good climb ability (I > > just did a high performance takeoff with just me and 70 gallons of fuel > > (cool air has the > > capability of flying to 25,000'; and has a single engine service ceiling > > of > > 16,000'. I'm jazzed! > > > > Sorry I got so involved. Several people wanted to know what was installed, > > so I though I would try to be complete and answer all at the same time. > > > > Larry Wokral > > > > > > > > > __________ NOD32 1.992 (20050205) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > > __________ NOD32 1.992 (20050205) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 06, 2005
From: Chris Schuermann <cschuerm(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: RE: Avionics
John Vormbaum wrote: > The problem is having caviar taste on a grilled cheese diet... I thought was was generally refered to as "being an airplane owner" ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "alh1(at)juno.com" <alh1(at)juno.com>
Date: Feb 07, 2005
Subject: Re: RE: Avionics
WITH ALL OF THIS TALK ABOUT NEW PANELS AND NEW RADIOS, I THOUGHT I WOULD SHARE MY RECENT AVIONICS CHANGE WITH THE GROUP. MY KX-175 HAS NOW REACHED THE POINT WHERE THE AVIONICS SHOP REFUSES TO LET ME DROP IT OFF FOR REPAIR. I TRIED TO LEAVE IT ON THE DOORSTEP IN A STRAW BSKET, BUT APPARENTLY THIS HAS BEEN DONE BEFORE AND THEY REFUSED TO MOVE IT INSIDE. SINCE I HAVE A GPS, I DECIDED TO REPLACE THE KING NAV COM WITH HALF A RADIO, A KY 196 (COMM ONLY). I STARTED TO GET A MX-20 WITH A GARMIN 430, BUT THE BANK WOULD NOT GO 125% ON MY HOUSE SO I WILL HAVE TO WAIT. I THOUGHT ABOUT GETTING A PART TIME JOB, BUT HESS IS NOT HIRING LATE NIGHT CLERKS AND DANCING IN CLUBS WITH MEN PUTTING MONEY IN MY WAIST BAND WAS A LITTLE TO DEGRADING, EVEN FOR ME. (ALTHOUGH MY FAMILY HAS BEEN TELLING EVERYONE THAT WAS MY OCCUPATION FOR YEARS BECAUSE THEY WERE TO ASHAMED TO LET ANYONE KNOW THERE WAS A LAWYER IN THE FAMILY) NOW MY MECHANIC TELLS ME THE REST OF THE RADIO WILL NEED TO BE ADDED TO KEEP FROM HAVING A BIG HOLE IN THE PANEL. APPARENTLY A KN53 WILL NOW HAVE TO BE PURCHASED TO FULFILL THIS NEED. IF ANY OF YOU HAPPEN TO SEE A FAT OLD MAN DANCING IN HIS SPEEDO, REMEMBER, THE MONEY IN THE WASTE BAND IS BEING USED TO FILL THE PANEL... AL HOFFMAN Now includes pop-up blocker! Only $14.95/month -visit http://www.juno.com/surf to sign up today! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "nick" <nick(at)container.com>
Subject: RE: Avionics
Date: Feb 06, 2005
al this is a one of the funniest emails i have read all week.where are you based?.Nick N690DB -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of alh1(at)juno.com Subject: Re: Commander-List: RE: Avionics WITH ALL OF THIS TALK ABOUT NEW PANELS AND NEW RADIOS, I THOUGHT I WOULD SHARE MY RECENT AVIONICS CHANGE WITH THE GROUP. MY KX-175 HAS NOW REACHED THE POINT WHERE THE AVIONICS SHOP REFUSES TO LET ME DROP IT OFF FOR REPAIR. I TRIED TO LEAVE IT ON THE DOORSTEP IN A STRAW BSKET, BUT APPARENTLY THIS HAS BEEN DONE BEFORE AND THEY REFUSED TO MOVE IT INSIDE. SINCE I HAVE A GPS, I DECIDED TO REPLACE THE KING NAV COM WITH HALF A RADIO, A KY 196 (COMM ONLY). I STARTED TO GET A MX-20 WITH A GARMIN 430, BUT THE BANK WOULD NOT GO 125% ON MY HOUSE SO I WILL HAVE TO WAIT. I THOUGHT ABOUT GETTING A PART TIME JOB, BUT HESS IS NOT HIRING LATE NIGHT CLERKS AND DANCING IN CLUBS WITH MEN PUTTING MONEY IN MY WAIST BAND WAS A LITTLE TO DEGRADING, EVEN FOR ME. (ALTHOUGH MY FAMILY HAS BEEN TELLING EVERYONE THAT WAS MY OCCUPATION FOR YEARS BECAUSE THEY WERE TO ASHAMED TO LET ANYONE KNOW THERE WAS A LAWYER IN THE FAMILY) NOW MY MECHANIC TELLS ME THE REST OF THE RADIO WILL NEED TO BE ADDED TO KEEP FROM HAVING A BIG HOLE IN THE PANEL. APPARENTLY A KN53 WILL NOW HAVE TO BE PURCHASED TO FULFILL THIS NEED. IF ANY OF YOU HAPPEN TO SEE A FAT OLD MAN DANCING IN HIS SPEEDO, REMEMBER, THE MONEY IN THE WASTE BAND IS BEING USED TO FILL THE PANEL... AL HOFFMAN Now includes pop-up blocker! Only $14.95/month -visit http://www.juno.com/surf to sign up today! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Barry Hancock <radialpower(at)cox.net>
Subject: Sir Barry photos of 680E
Date: Feb 07, 2005
Sir Barry, At the fly-in at HIO a few years ago, you took some air to air photos of my ship. Do you have any of those that you could email me off list? Thanks! Barry N680E ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "James Rodriguez Colom" <jamesrodriguez(at)bppr.com>
Date: Feb 07, 2005
Subject: RE: Avionics
Hi Larry, Can you tell us more about the Merlyn 320 conversion? In the Mirage installation, those engines were blamed for excessive vibration, oil consumption and temperatures. How does it behave in the 500B? Sounds like a great panel. I'm thinking about the MX20 and GNS430 myself. What convinced you to go the 480 route? Jimmy -----Original Message----- From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Larry Wokral Subject: Commander-List: RE: Avionics >Wow Larry, All I know is that when your airplane is done, it's going to be one of the finest examples of a piston commander. What did you put in your panel? I need to do avionics next, I was thinking Garmin GNS480 (CNX80) plus the MX20 MFD...> Yup John, that's what I would suggest. I put in a new CNX80; MX20 with Chart View and terrain options; Garmin GTX330 S mode transponder with TIS to the MX20; Shadin Digidata fuel flow/air data computer that cross feeds air data info to the CNX80 (approved as primary replacement for the stock fuel flow gauge during the Merlyn 320 conversion); PS Engineering 7000B audio panel w/seven place stereo intercom (with cell phone connect, dual stereo audio inputs that can be switched or shared from front seats and back; PS Engineering PXE7300 CD/MP3/AM&FM player; a four receptacle 28 to 12V converter mounted at the rear table and one receptacle at the copilot's lower panel (I have a small 12V to 115V inverter that can plug into any of these for laptops, coolers, etc.); Electronics International volt/amp, MP, RPM, and dual CHT gauges as primary replacements; and two JPI EDM800 engine scanners with all available scanning options (all CHTs, all EGTs, TIT, IAT, OAT, fuel flow, volt/amps). I already had and reused a King HSI, a 1000E Stormscope, and a KX155 as the secondary radio. We built a new center panel section. The MX20, CNX80, and GTX330 are mounted in a stack on the left half. This was considered to be within the normal IFR scan, so no separate "within scan" enunciators were required. The PS Eng 7000B, PXE7300, and KX155 are mounted immediately to the right of those in another stack. The Shadin, Stormscope, and JPIs are lined up vertically to the right of those with the two 3-in-one gauges and the E.I. dual CHT gauge horizontally below them. The MP, RPM, and volt/amp gauges are in a horizontal row of six in a small, extended sub panel running across the top just under the glare shield. While we were at it, I put in an Electro luminescent light strip under the glare shield that is wired to the main bus and has a battery backup. I also put Electro Luminescent light rings around all instruments and gauges that weren't already internally lighted. As a backup, I left in the existing post lights too. For now, I left the copilot's panel alone. It has a new A.I., older T&B, older VSI, and older DG. Some of these still have the older brow lights as does the flap and trim indicators. We installed Bose's buss powered jack for my headset. We also prewired the main harness for the XM/WX audio entertainment & weather links where the weather will be displayed on the MX20. It's pretty hard to imagine all of this without a photo. I need to take some. There were a lot of complications encountered during the installation. A lot of old wiring behind the panel was removed and replaced with a new harness designed for this particular installation. Many of these components are long, leaving little clearance in the back - another reason for a formed custom harness. Instead of in-line fuses for the additional gauges etc. as is suggested by the manufacturers, we made a small new sub panel and attached it just below the existing avionics bus so that an additional row of pullable circuit breakers could be installed. Where ever possible, we wired through existing cannon plugs for easier future maintenance. Because the amperage load is now substantially higher (easily handled by the two 70 amp alternators included with the Merlyn 320 conversion), we had to run a larger feed wire from the new Zefftronics Alternator Controller/Voltage Regulator too. I've spent lots of bucks over the last couple of years for the Merlyn 320 conversion, the new built in altitude compensating oxygen system (dual 115 cf Kevlar bottles mounted aft of the extended baggage area on the starboard side opposite the battery), and the avionics installation. Now I'm broke, eating chicken pot pies for dinner, and can't afford avgas. The plane still needs paint - I'll just have to keep it waxed up for now. The interior is in OK shape, but it is in an older style and not up to what the plane deserves. I still need to refinish and re-label the overhead panel and the quadrant. When I bought the plane, it already had the dual pane cabin windows, flap gap seals, the Shrike nose, stinger tail cone, the square rudder cap, eyebrow windows, and the frameless vent windows. During the Merlyn conversion, we certified the extended baggage area (I previously had no paperwork showing its installation) as an additional 150 lb. "light weight" area. The other things I'd still like to do include installing winglets with tip strobes, new paint, leather interior refurbishment (with window and crew/cabin separation curtains), make a new small drawered "entertainment center" cabinet that could be placed between the copilot seat and the aft facing one behind it, exchange the rear bench seat for one that has the droppable center armrest, and install deicing boots (or maybe even a TKS system - don't need known ice, but good deicing or anti-icing would be good). The new "compact" propellers already have the hot prop kit. I'm also considering Merlyn's fuel increase system that allows an extra 70 gallons with their additional gross weight increase to 7,400 lbs. (fuel weight only to be added to the present allowed gross weight of 7200 lbs.). This increase would put the plane back into the 1,000 mile IFR range. It would also be nice to replace the present Century III autopilot with a new digital roll steering type like the S-TEC. Keep dreaming I guess! Sure, I've spent more money on this plane than I could ever expect to get back from a sale (and there's more to spend). I guess a way to rationalize this is by contemplating what other plane could do what this one can: with the short field performance and safety designed in by Mr. Smith, with the added performance of the Merlyn conversion, with the great sleek look of an Aerocommander, and at what purchase price. A pressurized turboprop would be nice, but the cost to operate one is out of my budget. This one will now cruise at 200 KTAS (75% power @ about 34 gph); has good climb ability (I just did a high performance takeoff with just me and 70 gallons of fuel (cool air has the capability of flying to 25,000'; and has a single engine service ceiling of 16,000'. I'm jazzed! Sorry I got so involved. Several people wanted to know what was installed, so I though I would try to be complete and answer all at the same time. Larry Wokral CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This communication and any attachments hereto contain information that may be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. The information is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the employee or agent entrusted with the responsibility of delivering the message to the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying or distribution of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please delete or destroy all copies and notify the sender immediately. In addition, although precautions have been taken to ensure that the data included herein is free from viruses or other malicious content, we cannot assure that such is indeed the case and disclaim any responsibility attributable thereto. AVISO DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD: Este documento, y cualquier anejo incluido, contienen informacin que podra considerarse privilegiada, confidencial y exenta de divulgacin bajo las leyes aplicables. La informacin es para el uso exclusivo del individuo o entidad a quien est dirigida. Si usted no es el destinatario, el empleado o el agente a quien se le confi la responsabilidad de hacer llegar el mensaje al destinatario, debe percatarse que la divulgacin, copia o distribucin de esta transmisin est estrictamente prohibida. Si ha recibido esta comunicacin por error, favor de borrarla o destruir todas las copias y notificar al remitente inmediatamente. Adems, aunque se hayan tomado precauciones para asegurar que los datos que aqu se incluyen estn libre de virus u otro contenido malintencionado, no podemos asegurar que as sea y, por lo tanto, no nos hacemos responsables de cualquier dao atribuible al caso. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com
Date: Feb 07, 2005
Subject: Re: RE: Avionics
In a message dated 06-Feb-05 20:03:09 Pacific Standard Time, alh1(at)juno.com writes: > > NOW MY MECHANIC TELLS ME THE REST OF THE RADIO WILL NEED TO BE ADDED TO KEEP > FROM HAVING A BIG HOLE IN THE PANEL. Very clever of him. Not that a sheet of flat gray sheet metal would ever be placed where avionics were missing .... no, better put more avionics there. Are you pole dancing or lap dancing? You'll earn more lap dancing ... that's where the money is, here in Las Vegas. With all this talk of panel-mount nuggets of gold, is it time to review Commander weight and balance vs. the original design with aft radio racks? Wing Commander Gordon Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: RE: Avionics
Date: Feb 07, 2005
What are you saying, Keith? If I put me & 5 new radios in the front, will the airplane adopt a permanent nose-down attitude? ----- Original Message ----- From: <CloudCraft(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: Commander-List: RE: Avionics > > In a message dated 06-Feb-05 20:03:09 Pacific Standard Time, alh1(at)juno.com > writes: > > > > > NOW MY MECHANIC TELLS ME THE REST OF THE RADIO WILL NEED TO BE ADDED TO KEEP > > FROM HAVING A BIG HOLE IN THE PANEL. > > Very clever of him. > > Not that a sheet of flat gray sheet metal would ever be placed where avionics > were missing .... no, better put more avionics there. > > Are you pole dancing or lap dancing? You'll earn more lap dancing ... that's > where the money is, here in Las Vegas. > > With all this talk of panel-mount nuggets of gold, is it time to review > Commander weight and balance vs. the original design with aft radio racks? > > Wing Commander Gordon > > Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. > > > __________ NOD32 1.992 (20050205) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > > __________ NOD32 1.992 (20050205) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Barry Collman" <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Sir Barry photos of 680E
Date: Feb 07, 2005
Hi Barry, The ones I took were taken on 'ordinary' film. I did scan a couple of the best ones some while ago, but the quality was not too good. I'll have another go shortly and get some better-quality shots off to you. Kindest Regards, Barry C. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barry Hancock" <radialpower(at)cox.net> Subject: Commander-List: Sir Barry photos of 680E | | Sir Barry, | | At the fly-in at HIO a few years ago, you took some air to air photos | of my ship. Do you have any of those that you could email me off list? | | Thanks! | | Barry | N680E | | | | | | | ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Moe" <moe(at)rosspistons.com>
Subject: Re: Moe Mills I need to talk with you.
Date: Feb 07, 2005
Kevin, Great talking to you. As per our phone con. anytime between about the 10th of July and the 15th of August will work for me. I am about 99% sure on this deal. Please advise as soon as practical. Regards, Moe ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Coons" <kevincoons(at)cavucompanies.net> Subject: Commander-List: Moe Mills I need to talk with you. > > Moe, > > I misplaced your cell phone number and I want to give you an update on the > crossing. Private email me if you'd like at kevincoons(at)cavucompanies.net or > call me at 859-992-6920 to discuss. > > Kevin Coons > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Barry > Collman > To: commander-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Commander-List: N6291B & N401E > > <barry.collman@air-britain.co.uk> > > Hi Steve, > > As promised, I've now extracted the history of your Model 500 N6291B and the > Model 720 N401E from my database and have attached them as .XLS files. Both > are > ready to be printed out on 'Letter' format paper. > > With regard to the date suffix letters: > "S" - indicates the Bill of Sale date > "A" - indicates the Application for Registration date, where the Bill of > Sale is > undated, or the owner moves to a new location. > > Unusually, both these Commanders retained their original ex-factory 'N' > numbers! > > With regard to N6291B: > (1) - Does anything in the paperwork or log books throw any light on the > propellers quoted in August 1983? What props were actually on the aircraft > at > that time and when were they actually installed? > > (2) - When were the winglets signed-off as being installed? > > Kindest Regards, > Barry Collman > Aero Commander historian (UK) > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CloudCraft(at)aol.com
Date: Feb 08, 2005
Subject: Re: RE: Avionics
In a message dated 07-Feb-05 11:15:17 Pacific Standard Time, john(at)vormbaum.com writes: > What are you saying, Keith? If I put me &5 new radios in the front, will > the airplane adopt a permanent nose-down attitude? > Oh, only when your fuel load gets down to about 60 pounds. Unless you've hung a weight back on one of the tail frames. I just thought I'd take this chance to toss the idea out to some of the new members/owners on the list that the original design incorporated a few hundred pounds of avionics in the racks aft of the aft baggage bulkhead and that used to by a Commander was never out of CG. With those gone and the weight moving into the panel, it's a whole new world in the balance. So any of you big spenders / grilled cheese sandwich gourmets planning a new panel, look very closely at your empty weight CG and what your condition would be with pilot seats occupied and minimum fuel. The factory trick (and I got Gary Gadberry to start doing this years ago) was to place a lead weight on the aft tail frame -- unless it was occupied by a flux gate, then it was a frame or two forward. Just some more cheap food for thought. Wing Commander Gordon Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Wokral" <l.wokral(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Merlyn 320 Conversion
Date: Feb 08, 2005
>Can you tell us more about the Merlyn 320 conversion? In the Mirage installation, those engines were blamed for excessive vibration, oil consumption and temperatures. How does it behave in the 500B? Jimmy> Scott Dickey, who also has one, described it here several months ago and probably did a better job than I can. Here are the basics. Hugh Evans calls it a "Merlyn 320 Shrike Conversion." The 500B, S, & U are currently eligible for this new STC (#SA01212SE). Mine was the prototype, although Scott's was completed first. The original engines are removed and replaced with Lycoming TIO540AE2A(MC) engines. These are wide deck engines with a 2,000 hr TBO that were originally rated at 350 HP. He buys them from the company in Spokane that removes them from the Malibu's that change to the turboprop STC. Mine had around 200 hours each since new. He then puts new Millennium up exhaust cylinders on them and adds his single turbocharger and exhaust setup. The Hartzell HC-C3YR-2UF/FC8468( )-6R props are required, so they have to be purchased if the plane hasn't already been upgraded with them previously. I elected to order them with the electric hot prop kit. The turbo waste gates are throttle linkage controlled and, since the turbo is mounted high, it requires no scavenge pump. The 70 amp alternators from the Piper installation are reused as are several other items including remote mounted oil filters, better air oil separators, the pressurized magnetos, and the electric hot prop assemblies if requested. He installs all new fire sleeved oil hoses and new engine lord mounts. The engines are derated to 320 HP at 38"/2500RPM. The maximum prop RPM is 2500. 42" MP (maximum intermittent) is allowed up to 18,000'. This gives an unofficial 15 more HP (approximate) for a high performance takeoff (in fact the pop off valve is set to allow this extra boost). Since the engines were originally rated at 350 HP, I don't expect any problem from doing the 42"/2500RPM takeoff, and I often do. The new single engine service ceiling (at 7,200 lbs.) is 16,000'. Scott says he gets 200 KTAS in the upper teens at 75% with about 36 gph. I haven't been up there yet, but I've been getting over 170 KTAS down low on local flights at 26"/2200 RPM (about 60%) with a burn of under 30 gph and TIT leaned to 1640 (about 65 ROP). The CHTs have always been well under limits (although its been cold here), I've seen no vibrations, and the engines seem to keep 9 quarts (when I put in more, it blows it out). The conversion includes a gross weight increase to 7,200 lbs. (up from the stock 6,750 lbs.). The extra weight of the new components is about 100 lbs., so you actually get a net increase of about 350 lbs. You can also opt for his 70 gallon fuel increase kit which takes the allowed gross weight to 7,400 lbs. (any weight over 7,200 lbs. must be in fuel). I have not yet added this, but I'm considering it. His certification has some other options too. I elected to take out the original fuel flow gauge and replace it with a Shadin Digidata fuel flow/ADC as the new primary. I believe that Scott went with a Shadin Micro Flow. Neither of these are approved by Shadin as primary fuel flow replacements (simply due to the lack of demand), but Hugh got them approved as options under his certification. The new performance is really awesome compared to stock. My C177 Cardinal RG was turbonormalized, and I had gotten used to flying high and from high DA fields without much thought. I missed that ability with the Commander. I first tried to get someone to do a simple turbonormalized system on the stock engines, but didn't get any interest - even from Merlyn initially. (Now, Merlyn does a turbonormalized system based on the work he did for the 320 conversion. He has installed 2 or 3 of those). After several discussions with Hugh, he decided that a reduced version of his already STCd Merlyn 350 just might be a good idea. It all evolved from there. Larry Wokral ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Wokral" <l.wokral(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject:
Date: Feb 08, 2005
>Sounds like a great panel. I'm thinking about the MX20 and GNS430 myself. What convinced you to go the 480 route? Jimmy> WAAS LNAV/VNAV and LPV approach capability. The price isn't much over a 530, and it has a lot more capabilities. Now Garmin is supposed to add WAAS to its 430 and 530 but at a cost of about $1,700 more. I figured why not just go with the CNX80 (GNS480). The avionics shop I used said that the installation cost is about the same for either. Larry ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "nico css" <nico(at)cybersuperstore.com>
Subject: Re: Merlyn 320 Conversion
Date: Feb 09, 2005
Great review, Larry. That sounds like about the right config for the B. It appears to rival the speed of the Aerostar a bit with the comfort of the Commander. Nico ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Wokral" <l.wokral(at)ix.netcom.com> Subject: Commander-List: Merlyn 320 Conversion > > >Can you tell us more about the Merlyn 320 conversion? In the Mirage > installation, those engines were blamed for excessive vibration, oil > consumption and temperatures. How does it behave in the 500B? > > Jimmy> > > Scott Dickey, who also has one, described it here several months ago and > probably did a better job than I can. Here are the basics. > > Hugh Evans calls it a "Merlyn 320 Shrike Conversion." The 500B, S, & U are > currently eligible for this new STC (#SA01212SE). Mine was the prototype, > although Scott's was completed first. The original engines are removed and > replaced with Lycoming TIO540AE2A(MC) engines. These are wide deck engines > with a 2,000 hr TBO that were originally rated at 350 HP. He buys them from > the company in Spokane that removes them from the Malibu's that change to > the turboprop STC. Mine had around 200 hours each since new. He then puts > new Millennium up exhaust cylinders on them and adds his single turbocharger > and exhaust setup. The Hartzell HC-C3YR-2UF/FC8468( )-6R props are required, > so they have to be purchased if the plane hasn't already been upgraded with > them previously. I elected to order them with the electric hot prop kit. > > The turbo waste gates are throttle linkage controlled and, since the turbo > is mounted high, it requires no scavenge pump. The 70 amp alternators from > the Piper installation are reused as are several other items including > remote mounted oil filters, better air oil separators, the pressurized > magnetos, and the electric hot prop assemblies if requested. He installs all > new fire sleeved oil hoses and new engine lord mounts. > > The engines are derated to 320 HP at 38"/2500RPM. The maximum prop RPM is > 2500. 42" MP (maximum intermittent) is allowed up to 18,000'. This gives an > unofficial 15 more HP (approximate) for a high performance takeoff (in fact > the pop off valve is set to allow this extra boost). Since the engines were > originally rated at 350 HP, I don't expect any problem from doing the > 42"/2500RPM takeoff, and I often do. The new single engine service ceiling > (at 7,200 lbs.) is 16,000'. Scott says he gets 200 KTAS in the upper teens > at 75% with about 36 gph. I haven't been up there yet, but I've been getting > over 170 KTAS down low on local flights at 26"/2200 RPM (about 60%) with a > burn of under 30 gph and TIT leaned to 1640 (about 65 ROP). The CHTs have > always been well under limits (although its been cold here), I've seen no > vibrations, and the engines seem to keep 9 quarts (when I put in more, it > blows it out). > > The conversion includes a gross weight increase to 7,200 lbs. (up from the > stock 6,750 lbs.). The extra weight of the new components is about 100 lbs., > so you actually get a net increase of about 350 lbs. You can also opt for > his 70 gallon fuel increase kit which takes the allowed gross weight to > 7,400 lbs. (any weight over 7,200 lbs. must be in fuel). I have not yet > added this, but I'm considering it. His certification has some other options > too. I elected to take out the original fuel flow gauge and replace it with > a Shadin Digidata fuel flow/ADC as the new primary. I believe that Scott > went with a Shadin Micro Flow. Neither of these are approved by Shadin as > primary fuel flow replacements (simply due to the lack of demand), but Hugh > got them approved as options under his certification. > > The new performance is really awesome compared to stock. My C177 Cardinal RG > was turbonormalized, and I had gotten used to flying high and from high DA > fields without much thought. I missed that ability with the Commander. I > first tried to get someone to do a simple turbonormalized system on the > stock engines, but didn't get any interest - even from Merlyn initially. > (Now, Merlyn does a turbonormalized system based on the work he did for the > 320 conversion. He has installed 2 or 3 of those). After several discussions > with Hugh, he decided that a reduced version of his already STCd Merlyn 350 > just might be a good idea. It all evolved from there. > > Larry Wokral > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Herman Hill" <maintenance(at)northstaraviation.net>
Subject: AD 94-04-14, NDT
Date: Feb 10, 2005
Looking for recomendations on a good NDT (ultrasonic) Testing service that is familier with the Twin Commander Spar Cap AD 94-04-14 and is near our location (western Montana). Any help would be appriciatted. Also on the Model 685 will it be required to remove all of the fuel cells to do this AD or can the cells be moved out of the way enough and still be left in the wing bays. Thanks, Herman Hill ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Wokral" <l.wokral(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: RE: Aerocommander 685 Possibly for Sale
Date: Feb 10, 2005
There is a fellow that has a 685 based here at my local field (Hamilton MT, 6S5). I spoke with him yesterday, and he told me he will probably be putting it up for sale shortly. He is older, doesn't have an instrument rating, and can't get insured. It has been in his hangar unflown for a couple of years. Our local mechanic is presently doing an annual on it. It looks like a real clean airplane. The mechanic is a friend of mine, and he said he has found no major faults. They are looking for someone to do the spar cap inspection now. The exterior paint is mostly a gray silver and is in very good condition. The interior looks like it has been reupholstered in a beige cream leather (maybe a leather like vinyl) recently. The radio stack is mixed King and older, but looks good. I believe that he said the engines are getting close to the 1,200 TBO, but that they have good compressions. I don't know what he will want for it (or what they are worth for that matter). If anyone is interested let me know, and I'll have him get in touch with you. Larry Wokral ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Vormbaum" <john(at)vormbaum.com>
Subject: Re: RE: Aerocommander 685 Possibly for Sale
Date: Feb 10, 2005
Larry, do you have a tail number or serial number? /John ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Wokral" <l.wokral(at)ix.netcom.com> Subject: Commander-List: RE: Aerocommander 685 Possibly for Sale > > There is a fellow that has a 685 based here at my local field (Hamilton MT, > 6S5). I spoke with him yesterday, and he told me he will probably be putting > it up for sale shortly. He is older, doesn't have an instrument rating, and > can't get insured. > > It has been in his hangar unflown for a couple of years. Our local mechanic > is presently doing an annual on it. It looks like a real clean airplane. The > mechanic is a friend of mine, and he said he has found no major faults. They > are looking for someone to do the spar cap inspection now. The exterior > paint is mostly a gray silver and is in very good condition. The interior > looks like it has been reupholstered in a beige cream leather (maybe a > leather like vinyl) recently. The radio stack is mixed King and older, but > looks good. I believe that he said the engines are getting close to the > 1,200 TBO, but that they have good compressions. > > I don't know what he will want for it (or what they are worth for that > matter). If anyone is interested let me know, and I'll have him get in touch > with you. > > Larry Wokral > > > __________ NOD32 1.995 (20050210) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > > __________ NOD32 1.995 (20050210) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: YOURTCFG(at)aol.com
Date: Feb 10, 2005
Subject: Re: AD 94-04-14, NDT
In a message dated 2/10/2005 7:14:18 AM Pacific Standard Time, maintenance(at)northstaraviation.net writes: Also on the Model 685 will it be required to remove all of the fuel cells to do this AD or can the cells be moved out of the way enough and still be left in the wing bays.


January 23, 2005 - February 10, 2005

Commander-Archive.digest.vol-bk