Europa-Archive.digest.vol-jh

November 10, 2011 - December 04, 2011



      as per the build book"
      Apparently I have "Matco 5 inch discs on the wheels with new seals fitted."
      
      
      I just popped the cover off the levers to look at the master cylinders and 
      there are A LOT of very large bubbles in the left hand tube leading out of 
      the master cylinder.
      
      
      I have just bought a bleeding kit and some 5.1 and will try to sort it out 
      tomorrow, I'm just worried there is a leak or something =93 as it was
       fine last week but absolutely terrible now..
      
      
      Do you think a simple bleed from the LH calliper will do the job?
      
      
      Regards,
      -Carl.
      
      
From: <duanefamly(at)aol.com>
Date: Nov 10, 2011
Subject: Re: Europa Finger Brakes
Describe the type of master cylinder you have as well as the type wheel cyl inders. There have been a few master cylinders of inferior quality experien ced by several builders. Mike Duane -----Original Message----- From: Carl Meek <carlmeek(at)gmail.com> Sent: Thu, Nov 10, 2011 12:43 pm Subject: Europa-List: Europa Finger Brakes Can I just get a bit of advice from anyone with finger brakes fitted? Mine seem to be a bit odd. Firstly, if i just pull a single one of them it will hit the stop, whereas if i pull them both they have more feel and don 't hit the stop quite so much, however they seem to respond better with a b it of pumping first. Essentially I'm saying that they appear to be substandard, need pumping to work properly, and even then pulling just one doesn't seem to work well. Any thoughts on what could be wrong? An engineer investigated it but could n't find anything wrong - he checked they were bled and suchlike, he then r eported it was caused by the fact the master cylinders were not big enough for the callipers so they need pumping. _blank>www.aeroelectric.com " target=_blank>www.buildersbooks.com _blank>www.homebuilthelp.com lank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution rget=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List ://forums.matronics.com lank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution ic.com .buildersbooks.com help.com onics.com/contribution /www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List om onics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 11, 2011
From: Richard Wheelwright <rpwheelwright(at)yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Europa Finger Brakes
=C2-I used Nev's method of the Kart Cylinders and it is perfect.=C2-=0A =C2-=0ANev you always give the perfect answer to a question " Thanx Nev" :-)=0A=C2-=0A=0A=================== ==0A=0ARichard Wheelwright=0A============== =======0A=0AFrom: Neville Eyre <neveyre(at)aol.co.uk>=0ATo: europa -list(at)matronics.com=0ASent: Friday, 11 November 2011, 21:35=0ASubject: Re: Europa-List: Europa Finger Brakes=0A=0A=0AHi,=0AIf you have the Jamar maste r cylinder, this is what you have to do......=0ALay out some clean paper on your bench, remove the Jamar unit from the plane and disassemble the unit, keep all the seals / springs / pushrods etc in the correct order, laid out on the clean paper.=0ATake a close look at the quality of all the parts... . this is about as poor as anything could ever be made ! Wrap all the parts up in the paper and lob it in the bin !=0AYou could invest a lot of time i n cleaning=C2-the buffing soap [ that was used to put the BS shine on the outside ] from the inside, and polish the machining marks from the bores, clean the soap from the tranverse bore between the two cylinders, ease the diameter and radius the edge of the nylon washers and try to make something out of it, but from experience you can spend a lot of time that rarely giv es you something you would want to put in an Aircraft.=0ATwo options.=0A1. =C2-Fit Matco cylinders, top quality, very expensive but will work. Can s till be a bear to bleed, but you can use the red [ cherryade] brake fluid t hat every Aircraft Maintenence Facility has ....=0A2.Use two of the Kart ma ster cylinders as fitted to the Mono Europa and original Trigear [ foot bra kes ], you will need to make longer levers [ to get mechanical advantage] =C2-BUT there are two kinds of seals / O rings around, one sort is suitab le for Dot 3,[ as supplied for the Mono] which works with the Europa calipe r,=C2-the other is for the cherryade that works with the Matco caliper. T rouble is you can't tell the difference by looking at them, if used in the wrong fluid, they expand / go squishy.=0AEuropa have a stock of these that they don't know which type they are, so no help there.=0AYou CAN use Silico ne Dot 5 with both the master cylinders and the Calipers, but it is damn aw ful stuff, very thick [ so is=C2-a bitch to bleed] and if you get any on paintwork [ or God forbid unpainted structure] you will never get anything to really get it off. Only one good place for Silicone, that is where Dolly Parton / Pamela Anderson has it !=0A=C2-Bleeding the set up with the Kar t cylinders is a breeze, big [Large Vet's syringe] bit of model fuel tube s tuffed over the bleed nipple, bung out of the Master cylinder, crack open t he nipple, squirt the fuid in, have someone peek at the bung hole, when it comes to the top, job done 5 minutes a side Max. Down side ? As the pads we ar you need to top up the fluid, but simple as you just need to dribble it in the bung hole to the bottom of the threads.=0AYou might be able to use t he Jamar unit as the lever / baseplate and graft the Kart cylinders on to t hat ? I will have a look tomorrow on the feasability of that.That would sav e a lot of mucking about.=0ACheers,=0ANev=0A=0A=0A=0A-----Original Message- ----=0AFrom: Carl Meek <carlmeek(at)gmail.com>=0ATo: europa-list <europa-list@ matronics.com>=0ASent: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:02=0ASubject: Re: Europa-List: E uropa Finger Brakes=0A=0A=0AThanks for the advice, I've just come from the airfield having done a bit more investigation.=0A=0AAttached is a picture o f my master cylinder, apparently it's a "New Jamar finger brake controller all filled with DOT5.1 fluid filled from the wheels as per the build book" =0AApparently I have "Matco 5 inch discs on the wheels with new seals fitte d."=0A=0AI just popped the cover off the levers to look at the master cylin ders and there are A LOT of very large bubbles in the left hand tube leadin g out of the master cylinder.=0A=0AI have just bought a bleeding kit and so me 5.1 and will try to sort it out tomorrow, I'm just worried there is a le ak or something =93 as it was fine last week but absolutely terrible now..=0A=0ADo you think a simple bleed from the LH calliper will do the job ?=0A=0ARegards,=0A-Carl.=0AFrom: <duanefamly(at)aol.com>=0AReply-To: <europa-l ist(at)matronics.com>=0ADate: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 23:16:54 -0500 (EST)=0ATo: =0ASubject: Re: Europa-List: Europa Finger Brakes=0A =0ADescribe the type of master cylinder you have as well as the type wheel cylinders. There have been a few master cylinders of inferior quality exper ienced by several builders.=0A=0AMike Duane=0A=0A=0A=0A=C2-=0A-----Origin al Message-----=0AFrom: Carl Meek <carlmeek(at)gmail.com>=0ATo: europa-list <e uropa-list(at)matronics.com>=0ASent: Thu, Nov 10, 2011 12:43 pm=0ASubject: Eur opa-List: Europa Finger Brakes=0A=0A=0ACan I just get a bit of advice from anyone with finger brakes fitted?=0A=0AMine seem to be a bit odd.=C2- Fir stly, if i just pull a single one of them it will hit the stop, whereas if i pull them both they have more feel and don't hit the stop quite so much, however they seem to respond better with a bit of pumping first.=0A=0AEssen tially I'm saying that they appear to be substandard, need pumping to work properly, and even then pulling just one doesn't seem to work well.=0A=0AAn y thoughts on what could be wrong?=C2- An engineer investigated it but co uldn't find anything wrong - he checked they were bled and suchlike, he the n reported it was caused by the fact the master cylinders were not big enou gh for the callipers so they need pumping.=0A_blank>www.aeroelectric.com /" target=_blank>www.buildersbooks.com =_blank>www.homebuilthelp.com blan k>http://www.matronics.com/contribution arget=_blank>http://www.matronics .com/Navigator?Europa-List p://forums.matronics.comblank>http://www.matr onics.com/contribution =0Aic.comw.buildersbooks.comthelp.comronics .com/contribution//www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List comronics. ======= ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: EURO02 part supplied wrong
From: Rowland Carson <rowlandcarson(at)gmail.com>
Date: Nov 11, 2011
On 11 Nov 2011, at 16:35, Jan de Jong wrote: > > Rowland, > > I'm close behind you (a race of snails?) and went to check my EUR002 screws. > And I share your problem. Kit 461 was also supplied with bolts instead of screws. > I'll be interested in your solution. > > Regards, > Jan de Jong Jan - Mike McClean at Europa read my e-mail posting and is getting the right screws sent to me on Monday. Good service! in friendship Rowland | Rowland Carson ... that's Rowland with a 'w' ... | http://www.rowlandcarson.org.uk | Skype, Twitter: rowland_carson Facebook: Rowland Carson | pictures: http://picasaweb.google.com/rowlandcarson ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 12, 2011
From: Frans Veldman <frans(at)privatepilots.nl>
Subject: Re: Europa Finger Brakes
On 11/11/2011 04:57 PM, Carl Meek wrote: > Attached is a picture of my master cylinder, apparently it's a "New > Jamar finger brake controller all filled with DOT5.1 fluid filled from > the wheels as per the build book" DOT5.1 is not per the book. The book says 5.0. You might think that 5.1 is an upgrade of 5.0, but it is not, it is entirely different stuff. Apart from that, the Jamar brakes are rubbish. My kit came with the Jamar cylinders, after spending almost a frustrating week in futile attempts to bleed them and to get these things working, I tossed them out and replaced them by Matco cylinders. Bleeding was then a piece of cake and the brake system now works like a charm. I'm glad I never flew with the Jamar cylinders but got rid of them just in time. > I just popped the cover off the levers to look at the master cylinders > and there are A LOT of very large bubbles in the left hand tube leading > out of the master cylinder. I have been there. Forget about getting these bubbles away. I pumped almost a full can of DOT5.0 through these things but the bubbles never went away. Now you have used DOT 5.1 instead of DOT 5.0, you have probably destroyed the seals. Don't bother fixing them, toss the whole thing out and replace them by Matco's and fill the system with red aircraft hydraulic fluid. Frans ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Christoph Both <christoph.both(at)acadiau.ca>
Subject: Europa Finger Brakes
Date: Nov 12, 2011
Frans, Could you please provide the exact part numbers for the MATCO Brake cylinders fitting the Europa TRI?Aircraft Spruce lists 4 types: MCM-5 and MCM-5A. MCM-4 and MCM-4A. Thanks! Christoph Both #223 Wolfville, Nova Scotia Canada -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Frans Veldman Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 8:00 PM Subject: Re: Europa-List: Europa Finger Brakes On 11/11/2011 04:57 PM, Carl Meek wrote: > Attached is a picture of my master cylinder, apparently it's a "New > Jamar finger brake controller all filled with DOT5.1 fluid filled from > the wheels as per the build book" DOT5.1 is not per the book. The book says 5.0. You might think that 5.1 is an upgrade of 5.0, but it is not, it is entirely different stuff. Apart from that, the Jamar brakes are rubbish. My kit came with the Jamar cylinders, after spending almost a frustrating week in futile attempts to bleed them and to get these things working, I tossed them out and replaced them by Matco cylinders. Bleeding was then a piece of cake and the brake system now works like a charm. I'm glad I never flew with the Jamar cylinders but got rid of them just in time. > I just popped the cover off the levers to look at the master cylinders > and there are A LOT of very large bubbles in the left hand tube leading > out of the master cylinder. I have been there. Forget about getting these bubbles away. I pumped almost a full can of DOT5.0 through these things but the bubbles never went away. Now you have used DOT 5.1 instead of DOT 5.0, you have probably destroyed the seals. Don't bother fixing them, toss the whole thing out and replace them by Matco's and fill the system with red aircraft hydraulic fluid. Frans ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Max Cointe" <mcointe(at)free.fr>
Subject: Tie down points
Date: Nov 12, 2011
Hi Bob, Many thanks for your answer. Could we get a picture ? (thanks to Jeff BB for the one he sent but without the speed kit) Max Cointe F-PMLH TriGear Kit #560 912ULS Airmaster 400+ hours De : owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] De la part de Bob Harrison Envoy=E9 : vendredi 11 novembre 2011 20:13 =C0 : europa-list(at)matronics.com Objet : RE: Europa-List: Tie down points Hi! All I=92m sorry about my standard of message and I have corrected it below, hopefully those whose Mother Tongue isn=92t English can now understand it.? Regards Bob Harrison From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Harrison Sent: 11 November 2011 17:33 Subject: RE: Europa-List: Tie down points Hi! Max I have put a long eye bolt through the slab of metal in the outboard end of the flap hinge so the eye just protrudes through the large speed kit fairing .on each wing. Similarly you could put an eye bolt into the re-enforcing in the tail where the old tail WHEEL spring was to be mounted.. I actually use the mono tail wheel spring since I need it to winch the aircraft into the trailor (. I tell folks it is my arrester hook for landing on my aircraft carrier I wish!) However the spring has saved my rudder during countless bounces on landing and take offs . ................. Suitable eye bolts can be sourced at yacht chandlers usually in stainless material. Regards Bob Harrison.G-PTAG From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Max Cointe Sent: 11 November 2011 17:00 Subject: Europa-List: Tie down points Hi there all ! The builder of F-PMLH didn=92t include tie down points and I=92m not ready to open the wings to fix a hook. What something invented to hold the plane on ground on a windy airfield? Max Cointe F-PMLH TriGear Kit #560 912ULS Airmaster 400 hours www.aeroelectric.com www.buildersbooks.com www.homebuilthelp.com http://www.matronics.com/contribution http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List http://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 12, 2011
From: "mau11" <mau11(at)free.fr>
Subject: Re: Europa Finger Brakes
X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 15, 201, 26 [cn] The Matco master cylinder is MC-4D. Good evening Michel AUVRAY ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Harrison" <ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: Tie down points
Date: Nov 12, 2011
Hi! Max. Unfortunately G-PTAG is in it=92s trailor and impossible to provide a photo at present. However I am aiming to fly down to London next Friday (weather dependent) and I will photo it then . But the construction is simple ...take a =BC=94stainless eye bolt (if I recall correctly I think it was about 4=94 long or 5=94 and I cut it down) , drill a hole nearly perpendicular to and through the large faces of the block of metal which sits between the outboard wing flap hinge brackets so that the eye of the bolt is positioned to just protrude through the leading edge of the speed kit fairing.(slightly up from the lowest point ) You need to do some pretty fine judging for the exact location .(You will need to cut a small hole in the leading edge of the fairing so the eye sticks through just far enough to get a piece of tie down cord through it when needing to tie the aircraft down. The length of the eye bolt is adjusted by two nuts fitted to the eye bolt one in a position under the block so that another nut can be tightened down on top of the block to lock the bolt and lower nut to the block. Check that operation of the flap doesn=92t conflict with the finished position of the bolt before flying. It is easier to fit the eye bolt with the faring removed and so re fit it after experimentation as to how long the eye bolt needs to be before locking up. If you can=92t understand by this description let me know ....but I=92m guessing it will be a poor photograph for clarity of purpose. I have no drawings or approvals, just plain old common sense .! Regards Bob Harrison G_PTAG From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Max Cointe Sent: 12 November 2011 17:46 Subject: RE: Europa-List: Tie down points Hi Bob, Many thanks for your answer. Could we get a picture ? (thanks to Jeff BB for the one he sent but without the speed kit) Max Cointe F-PMLH TriGear Kit #560 912ULS Airmaster 400+ hours De : owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] De la part de Bob Harrison Envoy=E9 : vendredi 11 novembre 2011 20:13 =C0 : europa-list(at)matronics.com Objet : RE: Europa-List: Tie down points Hi! All I=92m sorry about my standard of message and I have corrected it below, hopefully those whose Mother Tongue isn=92t English can now understand it.? Regards Bob Harrison From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Harrison Sent: 11 November 2011 17:33 Subject: RE: Europa-List: Tie down points Hi! Max I have put a long eye bolt through the slab of metal in the outboard end of the flap hinge so the eye just protrudes through the large speed kit fairing .on each wing. Similarly you could put an eye bolt into the re-enforcing in the tail where the old tail WHEEL spring was to be mounted.. I actually use the mono tail wheel spring since I need it to winch the aircraft into the trailor (. I tell folks it is my arrester hook for landing on my aircraft carrier I wish!) However the spring has saved my rudder during countless bounces on landing and take offs . ................. Suitable eye bolts can be sourced at yacht chandlers usually in stainless material. Regards Bob Harrison.G-PTAG From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Max Cointe Sent: 11 November 2011 17:00 Subject: Europa-List: Tie down points Hi there all ! The builder of F-PMLH didn=92t include tie down points and I=92m not ready to open the wings to fix a hook. What something invented to hold the plane on ground on a windy airfield? Max Cointe F-PMLH TriGear Kit #560 912ULS Airmaster 400 hours www.aeroelectric.com www.buildersbooks.com www.homebuilthelp.com http://www.matronics.com/contribution http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List http://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/contribution www.aeroelectric.comwww.aeroelectric.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "G-IANI" <g-iani(at)ntlworld.com>
Subject: Europa Finger Brakes
Date: Nov 12, 2011
Christoph The master cylinders that fit are the Matco MCM-4D. AS do not stock them but they can be ordered direct from Matco. Europa also supply them (the last pair I purchased were only just more expensive than Matco) How to fit them is covered in the Combined Build manual CBM-33T (Matco) available on the Europa site. Ian Rickard G-IANI XS Trigear, 300hours Europa Club Mods Specialist e-mail g-iani(at)ntlworld.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Max Cointe" <mcointe(at)free.fr>
Subject: Tie down points
Date: Nov 13, 2011
Hi Bob, Many thanks, I think I see how you did it. An even poor picture will be welcome anyhow, no hurry I won=92t make it before next maintenance operation. Have a good flight! Max Cointe F-PMLH TriGear Kit #560 912ULS Airmaster 400 hours De : owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] De la part de Bob Harrison Envoy=E9 : samedi 12 novembre 2011 22:31 =C0 : europa-list(at)matronics.com Objet : RE: Europa-List: Tie down points Hi! Max. Unfortunately G-PTAG is in it=92s trailor and impossible to provide a photo at present. However I am aiming to fly down to London next Friday (weather dependent) and I will photo it then . But the construction is simple ...take a =BC=94stainless eye bolt (if I recall correctly I think it was about 4=94 long or 5=94 and I cut it down) , drill a hole nearly perpendicular to and through the large faces of the block of metal which sits between the outboard wing flap hinge brackets so that the eye of the bolt is positioned to just protrude through the leading edge of the speed kit fairing.(slightly up from the lowest point ) You need to do some pretty fine judging for the exact location .(You will need to cut a small hole in the leading edge of the fairing so the eye sticks through just far enough to get a piece of tie down cord through it when needing to tie the aircraft down. The length of the eye bolt is adjusted by two nuts fitted to the eye bolt one in a position under the block so that another nut can be tightened down on top of the block to lock the bolt and lower nut to the block. Check that operation of the flap doesn=92t conflict with the finished position of the bolt before flying. It is easier to fit the eye bolt with the faring removed and so re fit it after experimentation as to how long the eye bolt needs to be before locking up. If you can=92t understand by this description let me know ....but I=92m guessing it will be a poor photograph for clarity of purpose. I have no drawings or approvals, just plain old common sense .! Regards Bob Harrison G_PTAG From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Max Cointe Sent: 12 November 2011 17:46 Subject: RE: Europa-List: Tie down points Hi Bob, Many thanks for your answer. Could we get a picture ? (thanks to Jeff BB for the one he sent but without the speed kit) Max Cointe F-PMLH TriGear Kit #560 912ULS Airmaster 400+ hours De : owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] De la part de Bob Harrison Envoy=E9 : vendredi 11 novembre 2011 20:13 =C0 : europa-list(at)matronics.com Objet : RE: Europa-List: Tie down points Hi! All I=92m sorry about my standard of message and I have corrected it below, hopefully those whose Mother Tongue isn=92t English can now understand it.? Regards Bob Harrison From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Harrison Sent: 11 November 2011 17:33 Subject: RE: Europa-List: Tie down points Hi! Max I have put a long eye bolt through the slab of metal in the outboard end of the flap hinge so the eye just protrudes through the large speed kit fairing .on each wing. Similarly you could put an eye bolt into the re-enforcing in the tail where the old tail WHEEL spring was to be mounted.. I actually use the mono tail wheel spring since I need it to winch the aircraft into the trailor (. I tell folks it is my arrester hook for landing on my aircraft carrier I wish!) However the spring has saved my rudder during countless bounces on landing and take offs . ................. Suitable eye bolts can be sourced at yacht chandlers usually in stainless material. Regards Bob Harrison.G-PTAG From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Max Cointe Sent: 11 November 2011 17:00 Subject: Europa-List: Tie down points Hi there all ! The builder of F-PMLH didn=92t include tie down points and I=92m not ready to open the wings to fix a hook. What something invented to hold the plane on ground on a windy airfield? Max Cointe F-PMLH TriGear Kit #560 912ULS Airmaster 400 hours www.aeroelectric.com www.buildersbooks.com www.homebuilthelp.com http://www.matronics.com/contribution http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List http://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/contribution www.aeroelectric.comwww.aeroelectric.com www.buildersbooks.com www.homebuilthelp.com http://www.matronics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 13, 2011
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Make Sure You're Listed! List of Contributors Published
in December! Dear Listers, The List of Contributors (LOC) is just around the corner! In December I post a list of everyone that so generously made a Contribution to support the Lists. Its my way of publicly thanking everyone that took a minute to show their appreciation for the Lists. Won't you take minute and assure that your name is on the upcoming LOC? Tell others that you appreciate the Lists. Making a Contribution to support the Lists is fast and easy using your Visa, MasterCard, or Paypal account: http://www.matronics.com/contribution Or, drop a personal check in the mail to: Matt Dralle / Matronics 581 Jeannie Way Livermore CA 94550 USA I would like to thank everyone that has so generously made a Contribution thus far during this year's List Fund Raiser! Remember that its YOUR support that keeps these Lists running and improving! Don't forget to include a little comment about how the Lists have helped you! Thank you! Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Anyone considered a ULPOWER UL260i engine
From: "Galaxy UL Power Engines" <mark(at)galaxymicrolights.co.uk>
Date: Nov 13, 2011
Here in the UK Galaxy UL Engines is working with a customer at the moment to fit a UL260iS 107hp engine to a Europa Swiss Taildragger in place of a Subaru. Work is in progress, engine mout sorted. We hope to have the Basic demonstrated instalation ready for the Flying Show at NEC over the weekend of 26 -27 Nov. Regards Mark Jones Galaxy UL Engines UK UL Power Agent. 07841 614577 -------- "If a Test Pilot tells you something thats so bloody complicated you don't understand it, then its all Balls" R,J Mitchell Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=357736#357736 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 13, 2011
From: "mau11" <mau11(at)free.fr>
Subject: Main leg fairing dimensions
X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 15, 201, 26 [cn] SGVsbG8gYWxsLA0KV2UgdHJhbnNmb3JtIHRoZSBLaXQgTrAgOTggZnJvbSBtb25vIHRvIHRocmVl IGdlYXIgDQpEb2VzIGFueW9uZSBnaXZlIG1lIHRoZSBsZWcgZmFpcmluZyBkaW1lbnNpb25zIGFu ZCBmaXhhdGlvbiB0eXBlIG9uIHRoZSBmdXNlbGFnZSBhbmQgb24gdGhlIHdoZWVsLg0KDQpBbmQg cGljdHVyZXMgaWYgaXQgaXMgcG9zc2libGUgDQpNYW55IHRoYW5rcw0KDQpNaWNoZWwgQVVWUkFZ DQpCdWlsZGVyIDE0NQ0K ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: ULPower 260i in Europa
From: "Galaxy UL Power Engines" <mark(at)galaxymicrolights.co.uk>
Date: Nov 13, 2011
Hi Martin. Where are you based? What Country? Here in the UK Galaxy UL Engines is working with a customer at the moment to fit a UL260iS 107hp engine to a Europa Swiss Taildragger in place of a Subaru. Work is in progress, engine mout sorted. We hope to have the Basic demonstrated instalation ready for the Flying Show at NEC over the weekend of 26 -27 Nov. Regards Mark Jones Galaxy UL Engines UK UL Power Agent. 07841 614577 -------- "If a Test Pilot tells you something thats so bloody complicated you don't understand it, then its all Balls" R,J Mitchell Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=357737#357737 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Tony Renshaw <tonyrenshaw268(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Jamar vs Matco Finger Brakes
Date: Nov 14, 2011
Gidday, As this picture displays, there is one really good use for the Jamar Finger Brakes. Here it is. Look closely. Reg Tony Renshaw ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Tony Renshaw <tonyrenshaw268(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Jamar vs matco
Date: Nov 14, 2011
Sorry if you get this twice, but it came back to me without the photo, so I thought it worth resending. Reg Tony Renshaw Sydney Aussie ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Jamar vs matco
From: "pestar" <peter(at)reivernet.com>
Date: Nov 14, 2011
While I do not have a Europa (I have a DynAero MCR-4S - don't shoot me) I belong to this list because of its Rotax 914 experience. I however do have finger brakes and chose them against foot brakes because of weight considerations and simplicity. If it is of interest and help I am happy to provide photographs of my installation which may be of assistance. The DynAero finger brakes are lighter than the Matco ones picture already published and have a locking mechanism which holds them on for parking and run-ups tests. I am happy with my choice. Let me know - happy to help Cheers Peter Peter Armstrong Auckland, New Zealand Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=357794#357794 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: ULPower 260i in Europa
From: "smartieb" <smartieb(at)bigpond.com>
Date: Nov 14, 2011
Hi Malcolm, I am in Brisbane, Australia and have had previous correspondence with Ian Rickard and cc'd yourself. Ian does have a CAD drawing of my proposed engine mount which I have yet to carry out an FEA analysis on. The date of fitting my engine could still be at least a year away. Let me know if you want to find out any more details. I would be very interested to see how your conversion works out. Ian did send an early photo of your 260i mount adapter for the Europa. Regards Martin Benson Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=357795#357795 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Sidsel & Svein Johnsen" <sidsel.svein(at)oslo.online.no>
Subject: "Flight into known icing conditions prohibited"
Date: Nov 14, 2011
- is one of the placards on my panel, next to "VFR operations only". We all have heard about the danger of icing, and we understand why it can be fatal. Today I ran the engine on idle for 3-4 minutes on the ground (prior to squirting engine conservation oil into the carbs until stopping, for winter storage). It was a foggy day, air temperature just around freezing. A soft, very thin layer of frost formed on the wings and fuselage when pulling the aircraft out of hangar. I had not, however, expected to see the rapid build-up of ice on the propeller during this very short run - see the attached two photos. There was no ice on the front face of the blades, but on the sharp leading edge there was a 4 mm buildup of clear, very hard and difficult to remove ice (gradually diminishing towards the blade root). This is seen as a white stripe along the leading edge on the photos. Ice had also begun to build up on the blade back face and on the tip edge. One can only imagine the loss of propeller efficiency and risk of vibration if flying through clouds or fog around/below the freezing point. I did not need this demonstration to heed the placard's warning, but it does bring the message home. Fly safely! Regards, Svein LN-SKJ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rowland Carson <rowlandcarson(at)gmail.com>
Subject: brake fluid
Date: Nov 14, 2011
All the recent postings about appropriate fluids for the tri-gear finger-brakes has prompted me to think about what is OK for the monowheel brake system. I'm using the standard Europa parts. My journal shows that, when fitting it, I cleaned up & lubricated my master cylinder with Castrol Girling Universal SAE J1703 (which appears to be DOT3), and later I bought a can of DOT5.1 with which to fill the system (when I get that far). I note Neville's enthusiasm for the red aircraft grade brake fluid (what's the proper name for that? Can I get it from LAS, for instance?) but also that Europa-supplied seals may be an unknown quantity with respect to what fluid they like. Is there any way (other than soaking them in a sample of fluid) to determine what seals I've got in my master cylinder and in my brake calipers? If the seals held in stock by Europa are not identifiable, where else could one get seals properly identified as to type of fluid for (a) the monowheel master cylinder and (b) the monowheel calipers? in friendship Rowland | Rowland Carson ... that's Rowland with a 'w' ... | http://www.rowlandcarson.org.uk | Skype, Twitter: rowland_carson Facebook: Rowland Carson | pictures: http://picasaweb.google.com/rowlandcarson ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Collings" <rcollings(at)talktalk.net>
Subject: Re: Europa Finger Brakes
Date: Nov 14, 2011
Hi I don't know what seal are fitted in your brake system so to be safe you must use DOT5 fluid no other. To help with bleeding the system first apply the brake on the wheel you are not attempting to bleed and tie the brake finger leaver in the on position. Now bleed the other brake circuit from the wheel cylinder by using one of the std pressure bleeding kit's [Airworld 300981 worked for me] that way you will drive the air up and out of the system at the header tank. Once you are clear of air on the first circuit lock the bleed nipple shut and repeat the same procedure on the other circuit. Good luck Richard ----- Original Message ----- From: Carl Meek To: europa-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 3:57 PM Subject: Re: Europa-List: Europa Finger Brakes Thanks for the advice, I've just come from the airfield having done a bit more investigation. Attached is a picture of my master cylinder, apparently it's a "New Jamar finger brake controller all filled with DOT5.1 fluid filled from the wheels as per the build book" Apparently I have "Matco 5 inch discs on the wheels with new seals fitted." I just popped the cover off the levers to look at the master cylinders and there are A LOT of very large bubbles in the left hand tube leading out of the master cylinder. I have just bought a bleeding kit and some 5.1 and will try to sort it out tomorrow, I'm just worried there is a leak or something - as it was fine last week but absolutely terrible now.. Do you think a simple bleed from the LH calliper will do the job? Regards, -Carl. From: <duanefamly(at)aol.com> Reply-To: Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 23:16:54 -0500 (EST) To: Subject: Re: Europa-List: Europa Finger Brakes Describe the type of master cylinder you have as well as the type wheel cylinders. There have been a few master cylinders of inferior quality experienced by several builders. Mike Duane -----Original Message----- From: Carl Meek <carlmeek(at)gmail.com> To: europa-list Sent: Thu, Nov 10, 2011 12:43 pm Subject: Europa-List: Europa Finger Brakes Can I just get a bit of advice from anyone with finger brakes fitted? Mine seem to be a bit odd. Firstly, if i just pull a single one of them it will hit the stop, whereas if i pull them both they have more feel and don't hit the stop quite so much, however they seem to respond better with a bit of pumping first. Essentially I'm saying that they appear to be substandard, need pumping to work properly, and even then pulling just one doesn't seem to work well. Any thoughts on what could be wrong? An engineer investigated it but couldn't find anything wrong - he checked they were bled and suchlike, he then reported it was caused by the fact the master cylinders were not big enough for the callipers so they need pumping. _blank>www.aeroelectric.com /" target=_blank>www.buildersbooks.com =_blank>www.homebuilthelp.com blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution arget=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List p://forums.matronics.com blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution ic.com w.buildersbooks.com thelp.com ronics.com/contribution //www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List com ronics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Davies" <brian.davies(at)clara.co.uk>
Subject: brake fluid
Date: Nov 14, 2011
Rowland, The original name for the red stuff was DTD585. I think the latest stuff has an H on the end. LAS do stock it. When I had a Mono setup I used exactly what the manual said to use (dot 3 or 4)and had no problems. Regards Brian -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rowland Carson Sent: 14 November 2011 22:23 Subject: Europa-List: brake fluid --> All the recent postings about appropriate fluids for the tri-gear finger-brakes has prompted me to think about what is OK for the monowheel brake system. I'm using the standard Europa parts. My journal shows that, when fitting it, I cleaned up & lubricated my master cylinder with Castrol Girling Universal SAE J1703 (which appears to be DOT3), and later I bought a can of DOT5.1 with which to fill the system (when I get that far). I note Neville's enthusiasm for the red aircraft grade brake fluid (what's the proper name for that? Can I get it from LAS, for instance?) but also that Europa-supplied seals may be an unknown quantity with respect to what fluid they like. Is there any way (other than soaking them in a sample of fluid) to determine what seals I've got in my master cylinder and in my brake calipers? If the seals held in stock by Europa are not identifiable, where else could one get seals properly identified as to type of fluid for (a) the monowheel master cylinder and (b) the monowheel calipers? in friendship Rowland | Rowland Carson ... that's Rowland with a 'w' ... | http://www.rowlandcarson.org.uk | Skype, Twitter: rowland_carson Facebook: Rowland Carson | pictures: http://picasaweb.google.com/rowlandcarson ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: "Flight into known icing conditions prohibited"
From: "AirEupora" <AirEupora(at)sbcglobal.net>
Date: Nov 14, 2011
A number years ago I was flying along the Alaska coast on a job in a Hughes 500. The fog keep getting lower and I had to fly lower to the ground. Then the whole helicopter started to vibrate through the controls to the point I had to make a landing quickly. Once on the ground I shut the engine off and there was about 1/4 -3/8 of inch of ice along the leading edge and under it. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=357876#357876 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Main leg fairing dimensions
From: "AirEupora" <AirEupora(at)sbcglobal.net>
Date: Nov 14, 2011
I took these pictures of my fairings. Hope they help Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=357881#357881 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/land_gear_coverings_004_665.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/land_gear_coverings_003_618.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/land_gear_coverings_002_171.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/land_gear_coverings_001_124.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Fred Klein <fklein(at)orcasonline.com>
Subject: A hat tip to the Brits
Date: Nov 14, 2011
> One of the great puzzles of the industrial revolution is why it > began in England. Why not France, or Germany? Many reasons have been > offered. Britain had plentiful supplies of coal, for instance. It > had a good patent system in place. It had relatively high labor > costs, which encouraged the search for labor-saving innovations. In > an article published earlier this year, however, the economists Ralf > Meisenzahl and Joel Mokyr focus on a different explanation: the role > of Britain=92s human-capital advantage=97in particular, on a group they > call =93tweakers.=94 They believe that Britain dominated the industrial > revolution because it had a far larger population of skilled > engineers and artisans than its competitors: resourceful and > creative men who took the signature inventions of the industrial age > and tweaked them=97refined and perfected them, and made them work. > In 1779, Samuel Crompton, a retiring genius from Lancashire, > invented the spinning mule, which made possible the mechanization of > cotton manufacture. Yet England=92s real advantage was that it had > Henry Stones, of Horwich, who added metal rollers to the mule; and > James Hargreaves, of Tottington, who figured out how to smooth the > acceleration and deceleration of the spinning wheel; and William > Kelly, of Glasgow, who worked out how to add water power to the draw > stroke; and John Kennedy, of Manchester, who adapted the wheel to > turn out fine counts; and, finally, Richard Roberts, also of > Manchester, a master of precision machine tooling=97and the tweaker=92s > tweaker. He created the =93automatic=94 spinning mule: an exacting, high- > speed, reliable rethinking of Crompton=92s original creation. Such > men, the economists argue, provided the =93micro inventions necessary > to make macro inventions highly productive and remunerative.=94 Then > there was Ivan Shaw... http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/11/14/111114fa_fact_gladwell ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 15, 2011
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: What's Your Contribution Used For?
Dear Listers, You might have wondered at some pointd, "What's my Contribution used for?" Here are just a few examples of what your direct List support enables... It provides for the expensive, commercial-grade Internet connection used on the List. It pays for the regular system hardware and software upgrades enabling the highest performance possible for List services such as the Archive Search Engine, List Browser, and the Web Forums. It pays for over 21 years (yeah, I really said *21* years) worth of on line archive data available for instant search and access. And, it offsets the many hours spent writing, developing, and maintaining the custom applications that power this List Service such as the List Browse, Search Engine, Forums, and Wiki. But most importantly, your List Contribution enables a forum where you and your peers can communicate freely in an environment that is free from moderation, censorship, advertising, commercialism, SPAM, and computer viruses. It is YOUR CONTRIBUTION that directly enables these aspects of Matronics List services. Please support it today with your List Contribution. Its one of the best investments you can make in your Sport! List Contribution Web Site: http://www.matronics.com/contribution or, you can send a personal check to the following address: Matronics / Matt Dralle 581 Jeannie Way Livermore, CA 94550 Thank you for your support! Matt Dralle Email List Administrator ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: brake fluid
From: Neville Eyre <neveyre(at)aol.co.uk>
Date: Nov 15, 2011
Hi Rowland, Master cylinders supplied with the Mono Kit, and the Europa caliper are set up to use Dot 3 and Dot 4 fluid, no reason to try anything else. Silicone Dot 5 will work, but no good reason to use that over 3 / 4. Cherryade will attack those seals, no idea what 5.1 will do ? The Matco calipers, as supplied in the Trigear Kit, are set up for cherryad e. The ''footbrake'' Trigear Kit will have the standard ''Monowheel spec' mast er cylinders'' and a replacement set of seals and washers to convert the ma ster cylinders to be used with the Matco calipers [ which are set up for ch erryade ]. The stock of these seals at Europa are loose and unmarked, no one knows whi ch ones they are? My suggestion to them to dispose of the seals, and start again went unheede d. So in short Rowland, bin the 5.1, fill with 3 / 4 when you are ready.. Cheers, Nev. -----Original Message----- From: Rowland Carson <rowlandcarson(at)gmail.com> Sent: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:27 Subject: Europa-List: brake fluid All the recent postings about appropriate fluids for the tri-gear finger-br akes as prompted me to think about what is OK for the monowheel brake system. I' m sing the standard Europa parts. My journal shows that, when fitting it, I leaned up & lubricated my master cylinder with Castrol Girling Universal SA E 1703 (which appears to be DOT3), and later I bought a can of DOT5.1 with wh ich o fill the system (when I get that far). I note Neville's enthusiasm for the red aircraft grade brake fluid (what's the roper name for that? Can I get it from LAS, for instance?) but also that uropa-supplied seals may be an unknown quantity with respect to what fluid they ike. Is there any way (other than soaking them in a sample of fluid) to determin e hat seals I've got in my master cylinder and in my brake calipers? If the seals held in stock by Europa are not identifiable, where else could one et seals properly identified as to type of fluid for (a) the monowheel mast er ylinder and (b) the monowheel calipers? in friendship Rowland | Rowland Carson ... that's Rowland with a 'w' ... http://www.rowlandcarson.org.uk Skype, Twitter: rowland_carson Facebook: Rowland Carson pictures: http://picasaweb.google.com/rowlandcarson - -= -- Please Support Your Lists This Month -- -= (And Get Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!) - -= November is the Annual List Fund Raiser. Click on -= the Contribution link below to find out more about -= this year's Terrific Free Incentive Gifts provided -= by: -= -= * AeroElectric www.aeroelectric.com -= * The Builder's Bookstore www.buildersbooks.com -= * HomebuiltHELP www.homebuilthelp.com - -= List Contribution Web Site: - -= --> http://www.matronics.com/contribution - -= Thank you for your generous support! - -= -Matt Dralle, List Admin. - -======================== -= - The Europa-List Email Forum - -= Use the Matronics List Features Navigator to browse -= the many List utilities such as List Un/Subscription, -= Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, -= Photoshare, and much much more: - -= --> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List - -======================== -= - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - -= Same great content also available via the Web Forums! - -= --> http://forums.matronics.com - -======================== -= - List Contribution Web Site - -= Thank you for your generous support! -= -Matt Dralle, List Admin. -= --> http://www.matronics.com/contribution -======================== ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Sidsel & Svein Johnsen" <sidsel.svein(at)oslo.online.no>
Subject: Re: "Flight into known icing conditions prohibited"
Date: Nov 15, 2011
Here is another photo that I should have attached yesterday - says more than a thousand words. Regards, Svein LN-SKJ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Raimo Toivio" <raimo.toivio(at)rwm.fi>
Subject: Re: Heavy In-flight Vibration Riddle /The Solution /The
Winner(
Date: Nov 15, 2011
Dear Frans, Remi, Brian and all who were interested Thank you for your Very interesting messages (they are below). During last three days my engine (912S) has got his 250 hrs service (in fact 50 hrs service only) + max and full care inspection because of the topic: Heavy In-flight Vibration Riddle. Before that (after my hazard and when changing sparks only) I had flown flawlessly 2 hrs 25 minutes w/o any problems and The Engine has performed great. The inspection and service was completed w the best pros in Finland available (I was there also, just looking behind their shoulders, do not worry). 1) Engine is like a new one and between The Factory Limits and Measurements excluding following 2) Right carburrettor, 2nd float, "some" material has "obviously" separated, gone and disappearred somewhere. - pls notice: these floats have checked last spring when completed 200 hrs engine service. They looked like ok then but did not checked very carefully, of course. - that little "separated" part could be also a malfunction of production, maybe it has never been there 3) That blue colored spark plug was really totally dead (it was NGK R DCPR8E) What ideas we got? A) if some part of the float separated during the flight it could have blocked partially fuel flow. After case it could have gone through the system and no problems anymore. If that is so, changeing sparks meaned nothing - a new start up the engine meaned. If that is so, please check your floats. For your information, there was a Service Bulletin about 15 years ago about those floats. I have not checked it so far (and that should be nothing in my case [engine 2006] but who ever knows). B) this case is a bit embarrassing but I am brave enough to report it to you (could be worth of it for some of you). We tried the engine with that broken spark. As Remi writed A single misfiring spark plug on one cylinder cannot cause the high level of vibration I have experienced. Confirmed. It cannot. I tried. But, what if (after checking the mags) I took off with one magneto only! And loosed one spark just after take-off. Then I had only three sparks! I have to say - I tried it today - and the The Vibras were very known. I have been there. If that is really so, I flied about one hour with three sparks only (there was a heavy head wind but I still was wondering where all the power has gone). That is also the well known CS prop syndrom: The RPMs are fixed: it is not so obvious to see engine limitations. *** What can I say: * check out your floats in the carburrettor chambers (well, Rotax owners at least) ** double check before take-off you have selected dual magnetos: if you loose one spark w two magnetos you will not notice but if you loose one spark with one magneto you will surely notice. And that will vibra you! I have a Cessna type key operated magneto. It is not so easy to see what magneto(s) is (are) valid: A, B or Both. If you are building a plane, have two separate switches. They are easy to confirm; both upp (and a secure latch down)! I took off after sunset and was a bit hurry and maybe also more all less nervous. That is a typical start upp for a chain which will easily lead up to the accident. In my case, what about loosing 1/4 spark during take-off - that was a very short grass strip. *** if you have engine problems during a flight try always magnetos. That is what you have learnt when flying your PPL. I did not by purposely but I was (maybe) wrong. _____________________ Trying to be a better pilot. A flight today was a last one I think until a year or even more has gone and the new season 2012 will begin... _____________________ The Competition has got The Winners - there are three of them. I will publish The Names of The Winners ( I assume I am free to do that ) very soon. Cheers, Raimo Toivio Europa XS Mono OH-XRT #417 Updated flight hours /landings: 258,15 /466 37500 Lempaala FINLAND p +358-3-3753 777 f +358-3-3753 100 toivio(at)fly.to www.rwm.fi -----Alkuperinen viesti----- From: Brian Davies Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 2:20 PM Subject: RE: Europa-List: Re: Heavy In-flight Vibration Riddle /The Solution /The Winner( Following on from Remi's post, it might be worth following the recent blog on the Rotax Owners website. A Rotax 912 owner suffered a partial fuel blockage to one carb that only showed itself under high power conditions- and then only intermittently. In your case, if you have a partial fuel flow problem to one carb, reducing fuel flow by changing power settings could make the symptoms disappear. Worth checking? Regards Brian Davies -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Remi Guerner Sent: 19 October 2011 10:02 Subject: Europa-List: Re: Heavy In-flight Vibration Riddle /The Solution /The Winner( --> Hi Raimo, As an engineer who has been working two decades for a spark plug company, I want to add a few thoughts about your engine problem: A misfiring spark plug, cannot cause detonation. A single misfiring spark plug on one cylinder cannot cause the high level of vibration you have experienced. There are only two cases where a spark plug can cause detonation: the first one is if you are using a spark plug with a too hot heat rating. In this case, the nose core and the center electrode of the spark plug becomes red hot and ignite the fuel mixture even without a spark. The second case is when the spark plug is not torqued enough, becomes loose so that the heat transfer from the shell to the cylinder head is limited, causing the spark plug to become very hot. Both cases will cause preignition and possible detonation. I assume you were using the right spark plug type and that your blue spark plug was found to be tighten correctly. So in my opinion, the very hot blue spark plug you got was not the cause but the consequence of another phenomenon, probably preignition and/or detonation, caused by something else. The two main causes of detonation are: a too lean mixture and a too low octane fuel. This is were I would direct my investigation. Preignition and detonation may seriously damage all combustion chamber parts such as piston, rings, and valves. After such a problem I would ground the aircraft until the root cause is found, and I would carefully check the above parts for damage. Before removing the cylinder, I would perform a compression check and a boroscope inspection of the combustion chamber. Hope that helps. Remi Guerner F-PGKL On 10/18/2011 03:58 PM, Raimo Toivio wrote: > I have earlier forgot to mention one thing: when > I tried to increase > power by moving a power lever forward, I got > significantly less power! This is a weird thing. Maybe the carb slide was stuck after all, so opening the throttle further would result in a leaner mixture. A leaner mixture burns hotter and slower. Maybe that caused the spark plug to fail. Another option is that you had a hidden problem: One spark plug lead cross coupled from another cylinder (so it was firing when the piston was at one of its lower positions), maybe due to a short circuit between two spark plug cables. The interesting thing is that nothing bad happens as long as the correct spark plug fires, because for the one with the wrong timing there is nothing left to ignite and it sparks into a non-combustible void. But then as soon as the correct plug fails, the mixture will be ignited by the remaining spark plug which fires at the wrong time, and the burning mixture works against the up-moving piston. This will also heat the spark plugs and cause a hell of a vibration. > The spark plug head was blue, you remember? Precisely. > I think it has been very hot. Maybe because it > was totally short > circuited. No, you can't get it hot by short circuiting it. Ignition has a very high voltage but low amperage. Total energy is very low, way to low to even warm the plug. > Also, I assume the coils are somehow connected > together. I mean, a > missfiring in one spark and in one cylinder, > could it also disturb > another one (spark /cylinder) ??? If so, that > means more vibra. I think you really have to carefully check the whole ignition and carbs. I wouldn't fly it anymore until this is done. I know it runs ok now, but maybe there was a reason why the spark plug failed, and if this reason still exists it will happen again. As far as I can tell, the whole situation is not what you would get with just a faulty spark plug. > Anyway - this is quite an unusual think to > happen. Sure it is. Therefore, dig to the root of it before flying it again. Frans Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=355494#355494 browse Un/Subscription, FAQ, http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List Forums! List Admin. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "William Daniell" <wdaniell(at)etb.net.co>
Subject: Re: Heavy In-flight Vibration Riddle /The Solution /The
Winner(
Date: Nov 15, 2011
Brave man to fess up -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Raimo Toivio Sent: 15 November, 2011 14:12 Subject: Re: Europa-List: Re: Heavy In-flight Vibration Riddle /The Solution /The Winner( Dear Frans, Remi, Brian and all who were interested Thank you for your Very interesting messages (they are below). During last three days my engine (912S) has got his 250 hrs service (in fact 50 hrs service only) + max and full care inspection because of the topic: Heavy In-flight Vibration Riddle. Before that (after my hazard and when changing sparks only) I had flown flawlessly 2 hrs 25 minutes w/o any problems and The Engine has performed great. The inspection and service was completed w the best pros in Finland available (I was there also, just looking behind their shoulders, do not worry). 1) Engine is like a new one and between The Factory Limits and Measurements excluding following 2) Right carburrettor, 2nd float, "some" material has "obviously" separated, gone and disappearred somewhere. - pls notice: these floats have checked last spring when completed 200 hrs engine service. They looked like ok then but did not checked very carefully, of course. - that little "separated" part could be also a malfunction of production, maybe it has never been there 3) That blue colored spark plug was really totally dead (it was NGK R DCPR8E) What ideas we got? A) if some part of the float separated during the flight it could have blocked partially fuel flow. After case it could have gone through the system and no problems anymore. If that is so, changeing sparks meaned nothing - a new start up the engine meaned. If that is so, please check your floats. For your information, there was a Service Bulletin about 15 years ago about those floats. I have not checked it so far (and that should be nothing in my case [engine 2006] but who ever knows). B) this case is a bit embarrassing but I am brave enough to report it to you (could be worth of it for some of you). We tried the engine with that broken spark. As Remi writed A single misfiring spark plug on one cylinder cannot cause the high level of vibration I have experienced. Confirmed. It cannot. I tried. But, what if (after checking the mags) I took off with one magneto only! And loosed one spark just after take-off. Then I had only three sparks! I have to say - I tried it today - and the The Vibras were very known. I have been there. If that is really so, I flied about one hour with three sparks only (there was a heavy head wind but I still was wondering where all the power has gone). That is also the well known CS prop syndrom: The RPMs are fixed: it is not so obvious to see engine limitations. *** What can I say: * check out your floats in the carburrettor chambers (well, Rotax owners at least) ** double check before take-off you have selected dual magnetos: if you loose one spark w two magnetos you will not notice but if you loose one spark with one magneto you will surely notice. And that will vibra you! I have a Cessna type key operated magneto. It is not so easy to see what magneto(s) is (are) valid: A, B or Both. If you are building a plane, have two separate switches. They are easy to confirm; both upp (and a secure latch down)! I took off after sunset and was a bit hurry and maybe also more all less nervous. That is a typical start upp for a chain which will easily lead up to the accident. In my case, what about loosing 1/4 spark during take-off - that was a very short grass strip. *** if you have engine problems during a flight try always magnetos. That is what you have learnt when flying your PPL. I did not by purposely but I was (maybe) wrong. _____________________ Trying to be a better pilot. A flight today was a last one I think until a year or even more has gone and the new season 2012 will begin... _____________________ The Competition has got The Winners - there are three of them. I will publish The Names of The Winners ( I assume I am free to do that ) very soon. Cheers, Raimo Toivio Europa XS Mono OH-XRT #417 Updated flight hours /landings: 258,15 /466 37500 Lempaala FINLAND p +358-3-3753 777 f +358-3-3753 100 toivio(at)fly.to www.rwm.fi ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Low Voltage
From: "Troy Maynor" <wingnut54(at)charter.net>
Date: Nov 15, 2011
Hey Folks, Just wanted to say I fixed my low voltage problem. It turned out to be the regulator. I checked all connections having anything to do with the charging system,(most anyway). Then having a spare in my cross country box, I put it in and ran it and all is well again. Like I said, I have about 125 hours on it. I MAY have shortened it's life one day during shutdown when I turned off the master before the engine, not sure. The battery was actually 2 and half years old. The Odessey literature states only a two year warranty on the battery. Thanks for all your help. This once more proves the great worth of this forum. Need to make my contribution to Matt. Troy Maynor Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=358053#358053 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 17, 2011
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Please Support The Lists...
Dear Listers, Just a reminder that November is the Matronics Email List Fund Raiser month. There are some very nice incentive gifts to choose from as well! Your Contributions alone keep these services up and running. Please make your Contribution today at: http://www.matronics.com/contribution or by dropping a personal check in the mail to: Matt Dralle / Matronics 581 Jeannie Way Livermore CA 94550 Thank you! Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Cheap fuel
From: "John Price" <nicolaprice(at)tiscali.co.uk>
Date: Nov 17, 2011
Just a quick note that Rochester now sell unleaded Avgas at 1.79/ litre inclusive of VAT. This is not mogas but 91UL Avgas. If you want any more information just give them a call. John. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=358270#358270 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Harrison" <ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: Tie down attachment with an eye bolt though Wing flap hinge
block(Trigear only)
Date: Nov 18, 2011
Hi! Herewith photo of the tie down idea on G-PTAG Regards Bob Harrison ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Harrison" <ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: Eye bolt tie down through wing/flap hinge block (trike only)
Date: Nov 18, 2011
Hi! Herewith a photo of the tie down location on the wing/flap hinge block on G-PTAG . Regards Bob Harrison. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 18, 2011
From: Jeff B <topglock(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Tie down attachment with an eye bolt though Wing flap
hinge block(Trigear only) Bob, I don't see a photo, only a data file Jeff - Baby Blue On 11/18/2011 12:59 PM, Bob Harrison wrote: > Hi! Herewith photo of the tie down idea on G-PTAG > > Regards > > Bob Harrison > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Harrison" <ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: Tie down attachment with an eye bolt though Wing flap
hinge block(Trigear only)
Date: Nov 18, 2011
Hi! Jeff That's why my second name is Jurassic! My damn computer is Toshiba 64 bit on Windows 7. No doubt there will be numerous folks with the same problem. I know Ivor Phillips and Peter Grant may convert them and re-post them again for me, please........? Regards Bob Harrison G-PTAG -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jeff B Sent: 18 November 2011 19:08 Subject: Re: Europa-List: Tie down attachment with an eye bolt though Wing flap hinge block(Trigear only) Bob, I don't see a photo, only a data file Jeff - Baby Blue On 11/18/2011 12:59 PM, Bob Harrison wrote: > Hi! Herewith photo of the tie down idea on G-PTAG > > Regards > > Bob Harrison > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 18, 2011
Subject: Re: Tie down attachment with an eye bolt though Wing flap
hinge block(Trigear only)
From: PHILLIPS I <ivor.phillips(at)ntlworld.com>
Hopefully it should show up now. regards Ivor On 18 November 2011 19:38, Bob Harrison wrote: > > Hi! Jeff > That's why my second name is Jurassic! My damn computer is Toshiba 64 bit > on Windows 7. No doubt there will be numerous folks with the same problem. > I know Ivor Phillips and Peter Grant may convert them and re-post them > again > for me, please........? > Regards > Bob Harrison G-PTAG > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jeff B > Sent: 18 November 2011 19:08 > To: europa-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: Europa-List: Tie down attachment with an eye bolt though Wing > flap hinge block(Trigear only) > > > Bob, I don't see a photo, only a data file > > Jeff - Baby Blue > > On 11/18/2011 12:59 PM, Bob Harrison wrote: > > Hi! Herewith photo of the tie down idea on G-PTAG > > > > Regards > > > > Bob Harrison > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Low Voltage
From: "rampil" <ira.rampil(at)gmail.com>
Date: Nov 18, 2011
Hi Troy, I did not see anything in your description to suggest battery malfunction. It did sound exactly like a failure of the charging system. Sounds like your 2.5 year old battery performed admirably in keeping you going by itself when the regulator failed. The approriate diagnostic test is to check the battery voltage (at the battery) while the engine is running. If it is not > 13.5V, the charging system is belly up. Cheers, Ira -------- Ira N224XS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=358405#358405 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Eye bolt tie down through wing/flap hinge block (trike
only)
From: "rampil" <ira.rampil(at)gmail.com>
Date: Nov 18, 2011
try changing the name of the downloaded file from .dat to .jpg Cheers, Ira -------- Ira N224XS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=358406#358406 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 18, 2011
From: Jeff B <topglock(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Tie down attachment with an eye bolt though Wing flap
hinge block(Trigear only) Perfect! Jeff - Baby Blue On 11/18/2011 3:54 PM, PHILLIPS I wrote: > Hopefully it should show up now. > regards > Ivor > > On 18 November 2011 19:38, Bob Harrison > wrote: > > > > > Hi! Jeff > That's why my second name is Jurassic! My damn computer is Toshiba > 64 bit > on Windows 7. No doubt there will be numerous folks with the same > problem. > I know Ivor Phillips and Peter Grant may convert them and re-post > them again > for me, please........? > Regards > Bob Harrison G-PTAG > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com > > [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com > ] On Behalf Of Jeff B > Sent: 18 November 2011 19:08 > To: europa-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: Europa-List: Tie down attachment with an eye bolt > though Wing > flap hinge block(Trigear only) > > > > > Bob, I don't see a photo, only a data file > > Jeff - Baby Blue > > On 11/18/2011 12:59 PM, Bob Harrison wrote: > > Hi! Herewith photo of the tie down idea on G-PTAG > > > > Regards > > > > Bob Harrison > > > > > ========== > ="_blank">www.aeroelectric.com > ooks.com" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com > et="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com > ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > le, List Admin. > ========== > target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List > ========== > http://forums.matronics.com > ========== > le, List Admin. > ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > ========== > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Low Voltage
From: "Troy Maynor" <wingnut54(at)charter.net>
Date: Nov 18, 2011
Ira, Yes the battery performed as it should. The only charging was in the hangar with the Battery Tender Plus. You are correct about reading battery voltage. My monitor was checking it as I flew along but I did not check it at the battery. Troy Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=358411#358411 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Fred Klein <fklein(at)orcasonline.com>
Subject: broken tap
Date: Nov 18, 2011
Well...I feel like I just REALLY stepped in it. While carefully, slowly, tapping 10-32 threads in 1/2" thick aluminum, I've broken the tap. I needn't go into detail as to what I was attempting to accomplish, but it was in conjunction with providing bolts to the mono LG swing arm to which brackets supporting a portion of a fairing for the main wheel would attach. Not sure how to proceed, though I suspect I'm not the first to break a tap. I'm not optimistic of being able to drill out the tool steel of the broken tap, and even if that could be accomplished, my hunch is I'd end up having to use a larger bolt. One possibility would be to grind the portion of the embedded tap which is proud of the surface of the aluminum, alter the bends in the bracket, and drill a new hole (say) 2 diameters away from the existing partially-plugged hole. On the other hand, perhaps there is a well-recognized method for extracting the broken tap? Any suggestions?...anyone? Fred A194 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2011
From: Lance Sandford <sandford(at)melbpc.org.au>
Subject: Re: broken tap
Fred Your not the first and wont be the last. If there is enough of the tap protruding fron the swing arm you can maybe cut a screwdriver slot using a 1 cutting wheel with a Dremel or similar tool. Sometimes you can tap it out, ( no pun intended) using a punch against the flutes, enough to get a grip with something more substantial. Good Luck Lance Sandford in Oz > > Well...I feel like I just REALLY stepped in it. > > While carefully, slowly, tapping 10-32 threads in 1/2" thick aluminum, > I've broken the tap. > > I needn't go into detail as to what I was attempting to accomplish, > but it was in conjunction with providing bolts to the mono LG swing > arm to which brackets supporting a portion of a fairing for the main > wheel would attach. > > Not sure how to proceed, though I suspect I'm not the first to break a > tap. > > I'm not optimistic of being able to drill out the tool steel of the > broken tap, and even if that could be accomplished, my hunch is I'd > end up having to use a larger bolt. > > One possibility would be to grind the portion of the embedded tap > which is proud of the surface of the aluminum, alter the bends in the > bracket, and drill a new hole (say) 2 diameters away from the existing > partially-plugged hole. > > On the other hand, perhaps there is a well-recognized method for > extracting the broken tap? > > Any suggestions?...anyone? > > Fred > A194 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "craig" <craigb(at)onthenet.com.au>
Subject: broken tap
Date: Nov 19, 2011
One method I have used successfully is to use a very sharp punch (the kind of thing you use to put dents in metal before you drill a hole) and hammer and "unscrew" the tap by tapping the punch with a hammer in one of the flutes in the side of the tap -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Fred Klein Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2011 12:15 PM Subject: Europa-List: broken tap Well...I feel like I just REALLY stepped in it. While carefully, slowly, tapping 10-32 threads in 1/2" thick aluminum, I've broken the tap. I needn't go into detail as to what I was attempting to accomplish, but it was in conjunction with providing bolts to the mono LG swing arm to which brackets supporting a portion of a fairing for the main wheel would attach. Not sure how to proceed, though I suspect I'm not the first to break a tap. I'm not optimistic of being able to drill out the tool steel of the broken tap, and even if that could be accomplished, my hunch is I'd end up having to use a larger bolt. One possibility would be to grind the portion of the embedded tap which is proud of the surface of the aluminum, alter the bends in the bracket, and drill a new hole (say) 2 diameters away from the existing partially-plugged hole. On the other hand, perhaps there is a well-recognized method for extracting the broken tap? Any suggestions?...anyone? Fred A194 ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: broken tap
From: "rparigoris" <rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us>
Date: Nov 18, 2011
Hi Fred A few ideas: **EDM Do a Google search on EDM http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_discharge_machining You would have to bring the piece to someone with a large enough machine to accomodate the part **You can go after the part with a hole saw (center hollow) and take out a plug of metal including the broken tap, but only if you promise not to ever break another tap ;-) you could ream the hole, then put in a precise plug (with a tapped hole in it) and "get it stuck" with 638 Locktight, that is if it is in an area you are OK with making a larger hole in. Warm the holy part (not more than spit sizzle) and cool the plug till the fit is a few thousands between, apply 638 and you will have one stuck plug! When it gets stuck half way, you will have to hole saw out the plug for the first hole saw hole! **I am not sure where the hole is, but did you ever see Pauls Swiss cheese swing arm? Perhaps you can make yours into a piece of Swiss cheese with a hole where the broken tap is? **I remember seeing tap removers for two and three flute taps, they have prongs to fit down the flutes. Perhaps have a look in McMaster, MSC and do a Google search for broken tap removers. Search Google for procedure for removing broken taps in aluminium. Now you will probably be breaking your promise, but on purpose break off another tap like you already did in a sample piece and try removing or plugging first. As far as removing stuck stuff, like Craig mentioned you can "beat it" if that doesn't work, "beat" it and "heat" it and then "beat" it. Watch out heating, i don't know what type of aluminium it is. I think if you stay under 300F it's probably OK but first try ~ spit sizzle temp (~212F). Of course you probably have a beautiful paint job on it! If thats the case, go under paint get hurt temp. **Bring the piece to a machine shop and I think a nice milling machine and a nice carbide cutter may get the job done? **For the future, unless it is a fitting that needs max. strength, drill hole over-sized for a 60% fit instead of 75%, I like Tap Magic for aluminium and use a very sharp tap, I like gun taps (no 1/2 turn in and 1/4 out needed), you can still get bottoming taps. Ron Parigoris Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=358433#358433 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Fred Klein <fklein(at)orcasonline.com>
Subject: Re: broken tap
Date: Nov 18, 2011
On Nov 18, 2011, at 7:45 PM, rparigoris wrote: > > **I remember seeing tap removers for two and three flute taps, they > have prongs to fit down the flutes. Perhaps have a look in McMaster, Ron...excellent suggestion...I find that "4 finger" extractors exist...and hopefully, I can find one locally which I can borrow! Thanks much...Fred ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2011
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: The Value of a Forum...
If you look forward to checking your List email everyday (and a lot of you have written to say that you do!), then you're probably getting at least $20 or $30 worth of Entertainment from the Lists each year. You'd pay twice that for a subscription to some magazine or even a dinner out. Arn't the Lists worth at least that much to you? Wouldn't it be great if you could pay that same amount and get a well-managed media source free of advertising, SPAM, and viruses? Come to think of it, you do... Won't you take a minute to make your Contribution today and support YOUR Lists? Please make a Contribution today at: http://www.matronics.com/contribution or by dropping a personal check in the mail to: Matt Dralle / Matronics 581 Jeannie Way Livermore CA 94550 Again, I want to say THANK YOU to everyone that has made a Contribution thus far during this year's List Fund Raiser!! These Lists are made possible exclusively through YOUR generosity!! Thank you for your support! Matt Dralle Email List Admin. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2011
From: GRAHAM SINGLETON <grahamsingleton(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: broken tap
Fred=0Ayou could try pushing four bits of locking wire down the flutes,twis t them =0Atogether and trying to work it out. Best approach at that stage i s twisting and =0Areversing a bit at a time. You will need to break off the bits of swarf from the =0Alast bit of cutting before the tap broke. Warmin g the aluminum might help, it =0Awill expand more than the steel tap. Good luck!=0AGraham=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AFrom: Fred Kle in =0ATo: europa-list(at)matronics.com=0ASent: Saturda y, 19 November, 2011 4:20:58=0ASubject: Re: Europa-List: Re: broken tap=0A =0A=0A=0AOn Nov 18, 2011, at 7:45 PM, rparigoris wrote:=0A=0A> =0A> **I rem ember seeing tap removers for two and three flute taps, they have prongs =0A>to fit down the flutes. Perhaps have a look in McMaster,=0A=0ARon...exc ellent suggestion...I find that "4 finger" extractors exist...and =0Ahopefu lly, I can find one locally which I can borrow!=0A=0AThanks much...Fred=0A ===================== ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2011
From: hagargs <hagargs(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: broken tap
Depending on how far you are in get a punch and a big hammer and punch it through all the way from the best side. Then drill the hole for a heli-coil and go ahead and put the screw in. By the way you should be using coarse threads for soft material like aluminum. Use 10-24 and lubricant when tapping. Steve Hagar -----Original Message----- >From: Fred Klein <fklein(at)orcasonline.com> >Sent: Nov 18, 2011 7:14 PM >To: europa-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Europa-List: broken tap > > >Well...I feel like I just REALLY stepped in it. > >While carefully, slowly, tapping 10-32 threads in 1/2" thick aluminum, >I've broken the tap. > >I needn't go into detail as to what I was attempting to accomplish, >but it was in conjunction with providing bolts to the mono LG swing >arm to which brackets supporting a portion of a fairing for the main >wheel would attach. > >Not sure how to proceed, though I suspect I'm not the first to break a >tap. > >I'm not optimistic of being able to drill out the tool steel of the >broken tap, and even if that could be accomplished, my hunch is I'd >end up having to use a larger bolt. > >One possibility would be to grind the portion of the embedded tap >which is proud of the surface of the aluminum, alter the bends in the >bracket, and drill a new hole (say) 2 diameters away from the existing >partially-plugged hole. > >On the other hand, perhaps there is a well-recognized method for >extracting the broken tap? > >Any suggestions?...anyone? > >Fred >A194 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Fred Klein <fklein(at)orcasonline.com>
Subject: Re: broken tap
Date: Nov 19, 2011
On Nov 19, 2011, at 5:10 AM, hagargs wrote: > By the way you should be using coarse threads for soft material > like aluminum. Use 10-24 and lubricant when tapping. Good point Steve...it hadn't occurred to me to use coarse threads. I'll be needing to safety-wire the bolts, so I'd ordered (and have in hand) AN3H-3 bolts...looking again in the Acft Spr cat., I only find 10-24 threads in some cap screws w/ slots for single blade screwdrivers. Guess I'll settle for what I have...and if the threads strip, upsize to 1/4 dia. bolts... Fred ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Andrew Sarangan <asarangan(at)gmail.com>
Date: Nov 19, 2011
Subject: Re: broken tap
Mcmaster has a number of tools for removing broken taps. I do remember using one of the extractors. You need to buy the right size for it to work correctly. Search under tap remover at mcmaster.com On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Fred Klein wrote: > > Well...I feel like I just REALLY stepped in it. > > While carefully, slowly, tapping 10-32 threads in 1/2" thick aluminum, I've > broken the tap. > > I needn't go into detail as to what I was attempting to accomplish, but it > was in conjunction with providing bolts to the mono LG swing arm to which > brackets supporting a portion of a fairing for the main wheel would attach. > > Not sure how to proceed, though I suspect I'm not the first to break a tap. > > I'm not optimistic of being able to drill out the tool steel of the broken > tap, and even if that could be accomplished, my hunch is I'd end up having > to use a larger bolt. > > One possibility would be to grind the portion of the embedded tap which is > proud of the surface of the aluminum, alter the bends in the bracket, and > drill a new hole (say) 2 diameters away from the existing partially-plugged > hole. > > On the other hand, perhaps there is a well-recognized method for extracting > the broken tap? > > Any suggestions?...anyone? > > Fred > A194 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Tony Renshaw <tonyrenshaw268(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Flap up method for single handed rigging
Date: Nov 20, 2011
Gidday, I am about to set up my wings to the fuselage for the first time and see a problem for single handed rigging. I am wondering if there is a design of a portable, light system of a strap setup or similar that clips onto the leading edge of the wing, and then goes up over a block setup that sits just above the flap closeout on the top of the wing, and then clips onto the trailing edge of the flap, consequently allowing the flap to "not fall forward on its hinges when the wing is rotated to the horizontal. I have a mod in my wingtips from Chuck Popenoe where I can rotisserie the wings and move them around single handed, with the tip supported by an inverted T section on castors. Once the wing is located it would be nice to be able to push it home from the wingtip, but the flap will need supporting. Any suggestions on how this can be done would be much appreciated. Reg Tony Renshaw Sydney Aussie. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 20, 2011
From: GRAHAM SINGLETON <grahamsingleton(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Flap up method for single handed rigging
Tony=0AI always rig with the flaps down, the flap will then engage with the operating =0Apin but you need a tapered guide in the flap root=0Ato locate for the final entering of the pin.=0AGraham=0A=0A=0A=0A___________________ _____________=0AFrom: Tony Renshaw <tonyrenshaw268(at)gmail.com>=0ATo: europa- list(at)matronics.com=0ASent: Sunday, 20 November, 2011 10:40:27=0ASubject: Eu ropa-List: Flap up method for single handed rigging=0A=0A--> Europa-List me ssage posted by: Tony Renshaw =0A=0AGidday,=0AI a m about to set up my wings to the fuselage for the first time and see a =0A problem for single handed rigging. I am wondering if there is a design of a =0Aportable, light system of a strap setup or similar that clips onto the leading =0Aedge of the wing, and then goes up over a block setup that sits just above the =0Aflap closeout on the top of the wing, and then clips onto the trailing edge of =0Athe flap, consequently allowing the flap to "not f all forward on its hinges when =0Athe wing is rotated to the horizontal. I have a mod in my wingtips from Chuck =0APopenoe where I can rotisserie the wings and move them around single handed, =0Awith the tip supported by an i nverted T section on castors. Once the wing is =0Alocated it would be nice to be able to push it home from the wingtip, but the =0Aflap will need supp orting. Any suggestions on how this can be done would be much =0Aappreciate ============ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Harrison" <ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: Flap up method for single handed rigging
Date: Nov 20, 2011
Hi! Tony I achieved this by including a tapered guide tube within the flap close out extension. The flap is allowed to fall into fully down position and the flap drive tube is also fully down .This tube receives the flap drive tube and guides it to be exactly in line with the flap drive pin so that it engages when you push the wing home into the spar socket. This can be applied to both flap close outs. For each wing. I also have welded metal RAMP extensions to the spar starboard socket which guide the port spar home into place as you push the port wing into place, this ensures the port spa is guided into the socket on the other side of the aircraft for single person rigging. I did publish photos of both of these items many eons ago . You may be able to search and still find them somewhere in the Europa Cyberspace. Regards Bob Harrison G-PTAG -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tony Renshaw Sent: 20 November 2011 10:40 Subject: Europa-List: Flap up method for single handed rigging Gidday, I am about to set up my wings to the fuselage for the first time and see a problem for single handed rigging. I am wondering if there is a design of a portable, light system of a strap setup or similar that clips onto the leading edge of the wing, and then goes up over a block setup that sits just above the flap closeout on the top of the wing, and then clips onto the trailing edge of the flap, consequently allowing the flap to "not fall forward on its hinges when the wing is rotated to the horizontal. I have a mod in my wingtips from Chuck Popenoe where I can rotisserie the wings and move them around single handed, with the tip supported by an inverted T section on castors. Once the wing is located it would be nice to be able to push it home from the wingtip, but the flap will need supporting. Any suggestions on how this can be done would be much appreciated. Reg Tony Renshaw Sydney Aussie. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 20, 2011
From: GRAHAM SINGLETON <grahamsingleton(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Flap up method for single handed rigging
Good description Bob!=0AGraham, cryptic mode!=0A=0A=0A=0A__________________ ______________=0AFrom: Bob Harrison <ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk>=0ATo: europa-l ist(at)matronics.com=0ASent: Sunday, 20 November, 2011 11:18:21=0ASubject: RE: Europa-List: Flap up method for single handed rigging=0A=0A--> Europa-List message posted by: "Bob Harrison" =0A=0AHi! Tony =0AI achieved this by including a tapered guide tube within the flap close out=0Aextension. The flap is allowed to fall into fully down position and the=0Aflap drive tube is also fully down .This tube receives the flap drive tube=0Aand guides it to be exactly in line with the flap drive pin so that it=0Aengages when you push the wing home into the spar socket. This can b e=0Aapplied to both flap close outs. For each wing.=0AI also have welded me tal RAMP extensions to the spar starboard socket which=0Aguide the port spa r home into place as you push the port wing into place,=0Athis ensures the port spa is guided into the socket on the other side of the=0Aaircraft for single person rigging.=0AI did publish photos of both of these items many e ons ago . You may be able=0Ato search and still find them somewhere in the Europa Cyberspace.=0ARegards=0ABob Harrison G-PTAG=0A=0A-----Original Messa ge-----=0AFrom: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com=0A[mailto:owner-euro pa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tony Renshaw=0ASent: 20 November 2011 10:40=0ATo: europa-list(at)matronics.com=0ASubject: Europa-List: Flap up ony Renshaw =0A=0AGidday,=0AI am about to set up my wings to the fuselage for the first time and see a=0Aproblem for single handed rigging. I am wondering if there is a design of a=0Aportable, light system of a strap setup or similar that clips onto the=0Aleading edge of th e wing, and then goes up over a block setup that sits just=0Aabove the flap closeout on the top of the wing, and then clips onto the=0Atrailing edge o f the flap, consequently allowing the flap to "not fall=0Aforward on its hi nges when the wing is rotated to the horizontal. I have a=0Amod in my wingt ips from Chuck Popenoe where I can rotisserie the wings and=0Amove them aro und single handed, with the tip supported by an inverted T=0Asection on cas tors. Once the wing is located it would be nice to be able to=0Apush it hom e from the wingtip, but the flap will need supporting. Any=0Asuggestions on how this can be done would be much appreciated.=0AReg=0ATony Renshaw=0ASyd ===== ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Fred Klein <fklein(at)orcasonline.com>
Subject: Re: Flap up method for single handed rigging
Date: Nov 20, 2011
On Nov 20, 2011, at 2:40 AM, Tony Renshaw wrote: > Once the wing is located it would be nice to be able to push it home > from the wingtip, but the flap will need supporting. Tony, With your fixed conventional LG, I assume that you'll be using electric flaps...if that's the case, you have some options on the positioning of the flap tube control during your wing attachment process. If flap control shows flaps retracted, a strap around the wing holding the flaps in the retracted position could be handy. I make this comment solely from noting that while moving my wings around the shop with the flaps flapping around can be irritating...alas, I have zero experience attaching the wings at a proper airfield. Fred ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flap up method for single handed rigging
From: Tony Renshaw <tonyrenshaw268(at)gmail.com>
Date: Nov 21, 2011
Thanks Fred,Bob Graham and co re flap rigging. I will have electric flaps and could therefore rig with the flaps at any position. At the moment they will fall right out of the close out and rotate such that the trailing edge of the flap can be against the wing, because I don't have the outrigger hardware to create an extended stop. I either need to come up with an extended stop for my flaps, or rig the wing with the flaps up. Has any of the electric flap Tri-gear guys managed this other ways, or have any suggestions? Reg Tony Renshaw Sent from my iPad On 21/11/2011, at 3:08 AM, Fred Klein wrote: > > > On Nov 20, 2011, at 2:40 AM, Tony Renshaw wrote: > >> Once the wing is located it would be nice to be able to push it home from the wingtip, but the flap will need supporting. > > Tony, > > With your fixed conventional LG, I assume that you'll be using electric flaps...if that's the case, you have some options on the positioning of the flap tube control during your wing attachment process. If flap control shows flaps retracted, a strap around the wing holding the flaps in the retracted position could be handy. > > I make this comment solely from noting that while moving my wings around the shop with the flaps flapping around can be irritating...alas, I have zero experience attaching the wings at a proper airfield. > > Fred > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steven Pitt" <steven.pitt2(at)ntlworld.com>
Subject: Re: Flap up method for single handed rigging
Date: Nov 20, 2011
Tony, I have tried single handed rigging with my trigear and the flaps are only one of the issues. However, I have used a short set of bungies hooked to the back pip pin and flap holes to hold the flap in position (a plagiarised idea) and although it needs care the bungie provides a bit of flexibility when pushing the wing home. A simple solution and it also helps to ensure the flap does not drop when turning from the vertical to the horizontal. Hope this helps. Steve Pitt G-SMDH Trigear XS ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Renshaw" <tonyrenshaw268(at)gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 8:04 PM Subject: Re: Europa-List: Flap up method for single handed rigging > > Thanks Fred,Bob Graham and co re flap rigging. I will have electric flaps > and could therefore rig with the flaps at any position. At the moment they > will fall right out of the close out and rotate such that the trailing > edge of the flap can be against the wing, because I don't have the > outrigger hardware to create an extended stop. I either need to come up > with an extended stop for my flaps, or rig the wing with the flaps up. Has > any of the electric flap Tri-gear guys managed this other ways, or have > any suggestions? > Reg > Tony Renshaw > > Sent from my iPad > > On 21/11/2011, at 3:08 AM, Fred Klein wrote: > >> >> >> On Nov 20, 2011, at 2:40 AM, Tony Renshaw wrote: >> >>> Once the wing is located it would be nice to be able to push it home >>> from the wingtip, but the flap will need supporting. >> >> Tony, >> >> With your fixed conventional LG, I assume that you'll be using electric >> flaps...if that's the case, you have some options on the positioning of >> the flap tube control during your wing attachment process. If flap >> control shows flaps retracted, a strap around the wing holding the flaps >> in the retracted position could be handy. >> >> I make this comment solely from noting that while moving my wings around >> the shop with the flaps flapping around can be irritating...alas, I have >> zero experience attaching the wings at a proper airfield. >> >> Fred >> >> >> >> >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flap up method for single handed rigging
From: Robert Borger <rlborger(at)mac.com>
Date: Nov 20, 2011
Tony, Go download Chapter 9T Fitting ailerons & flaps to wing - Trigear. On page 9T-6, 9T-9, 9T-11 & 9T-17 they show part TGW-1 which serves to limit the extension of the Flap. You could make up a similar piece from 1/8" aluminum and attach it to the outer flap support bracket as illustrated. Adjust the slot to allow full retraction and full extension and you are in business. You have a retaining mechanism for flap extension. Blue skies & tailwinds, Bob Borger Europa XS Tri, Rotax 914, Airmaster C/S Prop. Little Toot Sport Biplane, Lycoming Thunderbolt AEIO-320 EXP 3705 Lynchburg Dr. Corinth, TX 76208-5331 Cel: 817-992-1117 rlborger(at)mac.com On Nov 20, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Tony Renshaw wrote: > > Thanks Fred,Bob Graham and co re flap rigging. I will have electric flaps and could therefore rig with the flaps at any position. At the moment they will fall right out of the close out and rotate such that the trailing edge of the flap can be against the wing, because I don't have the outrigger hardware to create an extended stop. I either need to come up with an extended stop for my flaps, or rig the wing with the flaps up. Has any of the electric flap Tri-gear guys managed this other ways, or have any suggestions? > Reg > Tony Renshaw ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Andrew Sarangan <asarangan(at)gmail.com>
Date: Nov 21, 2011
Subject: Control fork assembly friction against skin
I just did some trial fitting of the control fork in the cockpit module. Although I took great pains to make sure the alignment was perfect, I overlooked something. I am talking about the fork assembly (CS02/Tufnol/CS03 sandwich) where it enters the tunnel through the hole in the thigh support. Since the manual insisted on cutting this hole as low as possible on the cockpit module's floor, I might have gone a hair too low. The edges of the CS02 fork is now pressing against the lower glassfiber flange. This friction is not serious, but even a small change in the setup can make it stiffen up significantly. My thought is to cut that part of the skin off, since I don't see it serving any special purpose. Photos are attached. Any thoughts would be appreciated. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 21, 2011
From: Frans Veldman <frans(at)privatepilots.nl>
Subject: Rotax EASA AD
Hi everyone, I came aware of a recent AD concerning the Rotax engines. Something about certain faulty crankshafts installed in 912's and 914's, serious enough to warrant an emergency AD for certified airplanes. Before I attempt to find out if my engine could have this faulty crankshaft, does anyone know if there is a list with engine serial numbers / years of built, that could possibly have this faulty crankshaft? It would be great if I would not have to dig out the crankshaft to find out whether it is ok or not, and don't have to worry about it at all. Maybe there is such a list but the art of managing paperwork is not my best developed area, so forgive me if I asked for the obvious. Frans ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 21, 2011
From: Frans Veldman <frans(at)privatepilots.nl>
Subject: Re: Eye bolt tie down through wing/flap hinge block (trike
only) On 11/18/2011 08:04 PM, Bob Harrison wrote: > Hi! Herewith a photo of the tie down location on the wing/flap hinge block > on G-PTAG . Ehm, the flap hinge is designed for holding the flap in position. Tying down the aircraft with it imposes the hinge to possible jerking loads, in a different angle than the hinge is supposed to receive during its intended use. I remember some notes about not using pencil marks on this apparently sensitive and critical part. Can anyone make an educated guess whether using this part as tie down point would not compromise the attachment or strength of the hinge? Frans ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 21, 2011
From: Jeff B <topglock(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Control fork assembly friction against skin
Andrew. Simply trim away the offending portion of the flange and continue on... Jeff - Baby Blue On 11/21/2011 9:22 AM, Andrew Sarangan wrote: > I just did some trial fitting of the control fork in the cockpit module. > Although I took great pains to make sure the alignment was perfect, I > overlooked something. I am talking about the fork assembly > (CS02/Tufnol/CS03 sandwich) where it enters the tunnel through the hole > in the thigh support. Since the manual insisted on cutting this hole as > low as possible on the cockpit module's floor, I might have gone a hair > too low. The edges of the CS02 fork is now pressing against the lower > glassfiber flange. This friction is not serious, but even a small change > in the setup can make it stiffen up significantly. My thought is to cut > that part of the skin off, since I don't see it serving any special > purpose. Photos are attached. Any thoughts would be appreciated. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Nose Wheel!
From: "robertpeterfrost" <robertpeterfrost(at)aol.com>
Date: Nov 21, 2011
I am trying to source Nyogel 767A but it is not held in the UK by Newgate Simms they have to import it and it will be in 100ml tubs and will take 3 weeks to come. It costs about 31.00 for this small tub, but that isn't the main problem it's the 3 week wait which then clashes with me being overseas for nearly 3 weeks over the Christmas Holidays, so no flying until the New Year!! Has anyone a small amount of Nyogel 767A I can purchase to save me the wait? Regards Robert -------- Robert Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=358633#358633 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Rotax EASA AD
From: "goff" <goffmoore(at)aviators.net>
Date: Nov 21, 2011
Frans, The EASA notification is misleading in that it only refers to certified engines because EASA only deal with certified aircraft. If you go to the Rotax website you can download the Rotax Alert Service Bulletin (Mandatory) that lists ALL the offending ENGINE numbers. Apparently only about 200 crankshafts were dodgy and they are all more recent, being numbers which start with 6. Hope this helps. Goff ps I'm also going to try and attach a pdf of the bulletin. Never done this before so fingers crossed. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=358634#358634 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/d05094_507.pdf ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Peter Zutrauen <peterz(at)zutrasoft.com>
Date: Nov 21, 2011
Subject: Re: Eye bolt tie down through wing/flap hinge block (trike
only) That would be my concern, I'm planning on a dedicated hard point slightly outboard of the hinge. Cheers, Pete A239 On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Frans Veldman wrote: > > On 11/18/2011 08:04 PM, Bob Harrison wrote: > >> Hi! Herewith a photo of the tie down location on the wing/flap hinge >> block >> on G-PTAG . >> > > Ehm, the flap hinge is designed for holding the flap in position. Tying > down the aircraft with it imposes the hinge to possible jerking loads, in a > different angle than the hinge is supposed to receive during its intended > use. I remember some notes about not using pencil marks on this apparently > sensitive and critical part. Can anyone make an educated guess whether > using this part as tie down point would not compromise the attachment or > strength of the hinge? > > Frans > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Peter Zutrauen <peterz(at)zutrasoft.com>
Date: Nov 21, 2011
Subject: Re: Rotax EASA AD
fwiw, http://eaaforums.org/showthread.php?785-RotaxOwner.com-Alert-912-amp-914-Crankshaft-check-your-serial-number-Manditory On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Frans Veldman wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I came aware of a recent AD concerning the Rotax engines. > Something about certain faulty crankshafts installed in 912's and 914's, > serious enough to warrant an emergency AD for certified airplanes. > > Before I attempt to find out if my engine could have this faulty > crankshaft, does anyone know if there is a list with engine serial numbers > / years of built, that could possibly have this faulty crankshaft? > > It would be great if I would not have to dig out the crankshaft to find > out whether it is ok or not, and don't have to worry about it at all. > > Maybe there is such a list but the art of managing paperwork is not my > best developed area, so forgive me if I asked for the obvious. > > Frans > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jeffrey Roberts <jeff(at)rmmm.net>
Subject: Fwd: question from Rough River
Date: Nov 21, 2011
To All, Below is a note that I received today from Rough River. I apologize not being able to make it last year as life got in the way. It seems maybe Labor day weekend may not be the best time for this event. A lot of Family commitments for all. I think this year we should consider maybe the week after or even two weeks after as we did a few years back. I seem to remember there was someone else that was considering planning the 2012 event. If so let me know or I would be happy to do it. Either way is fine but maybe we should go for a list earlier this year to see if the interest is still there. Looks like by there message below their prices have been lowered a bit. I for one will do my best to attend. My Kid is back in the states and most family emergencies have subsided... LOL! Regards, Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush Begin forwarded message: > From: "Clark, Donna F (Parks)" <DonnaF.Clark(at)ky.gov> > Date: November 21, 2011 10:23:08 AM CST > To: > Subject: question from Rough River > > > Morning, > Just checking in to see if you would like to book for September 2012 > Lodging prices are lowerJ > Lodge Room $80.96 > Standard Cottage$107.96 > Thanks > Group Sales Coordinator > Rough River State Dam Park > 450 Lodge Road > Falls of Rough Ky,40119 > 270-257-2311 > 1-800-325-1713 > DonnaF.Clark(at)ky.gov > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Max Cointe" <mcointe(at)free.fr>
Subject: Re: Rotax EASA AD
Date: Nov 21, 2011
Hi Frans and Goff, Here it is... Not that recent as mine is 6.811.381 built in 2002... Cheers, Max Cointe F-PMLH TriGear Kit #560 912ULS Airmaster 400 hours -----Message d'origine----- De-: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] De la part de goff Envoy=E9-: lundi 21 novembre 2011 17:17 =C0-: europa-list(at)matronics.com Objet-: Europa-List: Re: Rotax EASA AD Frans, The EASA notification is misleading in that it only refers to certified engines because EASA only deal with certified aircraft. If you go to the Rotax website you can download the Rotax Alert Service Bulletin (Mandatory) that lists ALL the offending ENGINE numbers. Apparently only about 200 crankshafts were dodgy and they are all more recent, being numbers which start with 6. Hope this helps. Goff ps I'm also going to try and attach a pdf of the bulletin. Never done this before so fingers crossed. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=358634#358634 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/d05094_507.pdf ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 21, 2011
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Make Sure You're Listed -- List of Contributors Published
Dec 1! Dear Listers, The List of Contributors (LOC) is just around the corner! On December 1st I post a list of everyone that so generously made a Contribution to support the Lists. Its my way of publicly thanking everyone that took a minute to show their appreciation for the Lists. As a number of people have pointed out in their Contribution comments, the Lists are a whole lot more valuable than your typical magazine subscription! Won't you take minute and assure that your name is on the upcoming LOC? Tell others that you appreciate the Lists. Making a Contribution to support the Lists is fast and easy using your Visa, MasterCard, or Paypal account: http://www.matronics.com/contribution Or, by dropping a personal check in the mail to: Matronics / Matt Dralle 581 Jeannie Way Livermore CA 94550 I would like to thank everyone that has so generously made a Contribution thus far during this year's List Fund Raiser! Remember that its YOUR support that keeps these Lists running and improving! Don't forget to include a little comment about how the Lists have helped you! Thank you! Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Davies" <brian.davies(at)clara.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Nose Wheel!
Date: Nov 21, 2011
Nyogel 868H is available from Farnell in the UK. 100cc costs 18.79. I use a sample of it on my aircraft two weeks ago and it works just fine. I obtained a sample from Nyogel in the USA which was delivered within 7 days. Regards Brian Davies -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of robertpeterfrost Sent: 21 November 2011 16:16 Subject: Europa-List: Re: Nose Wheel! --> I am trying to source Nyogel 767A but it is not held in the UK by Newgate Simms they have to import it and it will be in 100ml tubs and will take 3 weeks to come. It costs about 31.00 for this small tub, but that isn't the main problem it's the 3 week wait which then clashes with me being overseas for nearly 3 weeks over the Christmas Holidays, so no flying until the New Year!! Has anyone a small amount of Nyogel 767A I can purchase to save me the wait? Regards Robert -------- Robert Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=358633#358633 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Eye bolt tie down through wing/flap hinge block (trike
only)
From: Neville Eyre <neveyre(at)aol.co.uk>
Date: Nov 21, 2011
No Problem ! This is the position of the Mono Wheel Outriggers, the attachment and struc ture in the wing was set up to take the loads from that. Only point I will make, Bob must have had an early Mono Kit with the Alloy latch block [ that he has drilled though for the eye bolt] Trigear Kits hav e a plastic [ spacer ] block, later Mono Kits had a three piece[ tufnel / h ardened steel / tufnel ] latch block assembly. You won't drill though it i f you have converted from a Mono and left the steel latch block in place ! I suggest Trigear owners do what I do, back up the plastic with an alloy pl ate to spread the load. I also put a tube guide down to near the fairing to help find the hole. Check you have three bolts through each bracket to the embedded plates in t he wing. Cheers, Nev. -----Original Message----- From: Frans Veldman <frans(at)privatepilots.nl> Sent: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:14 Subject: Re: Europa-List: Eye bolt tie down through wing/flap hinge block ( trike only) On 11/18/2011 08:04 PM, Bob Harrison wrote: Hi! Herewith a photo of the tie down location on the wing/flap hinge bloc k on G-PTAG . Ehm, the flap hinge is designed for holding the flap in position. Tying own the aircraft with it imposes the hinge to possible jerking loads, n a different angle than the hinge is supposed to receive during its ntended use. I remember some notes about not using pencil marks on this pparently sensitive and critical part. Can anyone make an educated uess whether using this part as tie down point would not compromise the ttachment or strength of the hinge? Frans - -= -- Please Support Your Lists This Month -- -= (And Get Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!) - -= November is the Annual List Fund Raiser. Click on -= the Contribution link below to find out more about -= this year's Terrific Free Incentive Gifts provided -= by: -= -= * AeroElectric www.aeroelectric.com -= * The Builder's Bookstore www.buildersbooks.com -= * HomebuiltHELP www.homebuilthelp.com - -= List Contribution Web Site: - -= --> http://www.matronics.com/contribution - -= Thank you for your generous support! - -= -Matt Dralle, List Admin. - -======================== -= - The Europa-List Email Forum - -= Use the Matronics List Features Navigator to browse -= the many List utilities such as List Un/Subscription, -= Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, -= Photoshare, and much much more: - -= --> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List - -======================== -= - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - -= Same great content also available via the Web Forums! - -= --> http://forums.matronics.com - -======================== -= - List Contribution Web Site - -= Thank you for your generous support! -= -Matt Dralle, List Admin. -= --> http://www.matronics.com/contribution -======================== ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Nose Wheel!
From: "robertpeterfrost" <robertpeterfrost(at)aol.com>
Date: Nov 21, 2011
Thanks Brian, I will give them a call to see if they have any in stock. Regards Robert -------- Robert Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=358725#358725 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: carb bowl insulation
From: "graeme bird" <graeme(at)gdbmk.co.uk>
Date: Nov 21, 2011
I would like to put some heat insulation under my 912 carb bowls and was thinking of that sticky matting with foil on one side and stick to the bowls. but I am not sure if thats a good idea or not or which foil to use from ASpruce. I can only really see one fixing point - the engine bolt for a aluminium drip tray. Any better ideas? Not flown yet, should be the 10th Dec ish. -------- Graeme Bird G-UMPY Mono Classic/XS FWFD 912ULS/Warp drive FP Build nearing completion Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=358729#358729 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Tim Ward <ward.t(at)xtra.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Control fork assembly friction against skin
Date: Nov 22, 2011
Andrew, Remember that the range of play needed in the Aileron is restricted by two limbs either side of stick. So any rubbing on the extremes is not an issue. Cheers, Tim Tim Ward 12 Waiwetu Street Fendalton, Christchurch, 8052 New Zealand. ward.t(at)xtra.co.nz Ph 64 3 3515166 Mob 0210640221 On 22/11/2011, at 4:22 AM, Andrew Sarangan wrote: > I just did some trial fitting of the control fork in the cockpit module. Although I took great pains to make sure the alignment was perfect, I overlooked something. I am talking about the fork assembly (CS02/Tufnol/CS03 sandwich) where it enters the tunnel through the hole in the thigh support. Since the manual insisted on cutting this hole as low as possible on the cockpit module's floor, I might have gone a hair too low. The edges of the CS02 fork is now pressing against the lower glassfiber flange. This friction is not serious, but even a small change in the setup can make it stiffen up significantly. My thought is to cut that part of the skin off, since I don't see it serving any special purpose. Photos are attached. Any thoughts would be appreciated. > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 21, 2011
From: Frans Veldman <frans(at)privatepilots.nl>
Subject: Re: Rotax EASA AD
On 11/21/2011 06:07 PM, Max Cointe wrote: > Here it is... Not that recent as mine is 6.811.381 built in 2002... Whoops. My engine is uncomfortably close with 6772973, but still outside the range! Thanks for the document (and the others also thanks for the info)! Frans ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Sidsel & Svein Johnsen" <sidsel.svein(at)oslo.online.no>
Subject: carb bowl insulation
Date: Nov 21, 2011
Graeme, Attached are five photos of my carb heat shields (912 ULS), which I hope will say more than a thousand words. The shield is made of thin stainless steel plate. The support is one continous strip cut from a stainless steel plate, riveted to the shield. The zig-zag shape makes the support sufficiently stiff against vibrations. You will see that the aft, lower fixation of the shield support is the screw clamp that holds the exhaust temp thermocouple in place, while the forward, upper fixation is a standard stainless steel screw hose clamp. Both are tightened "just so" - no point tightening hard. If you do not have these thermocouples installed, use hose clamps. Good luck. Regards, Svein LN-SKJ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robert Borger <rlborger(at)mac.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: question from Rough River
Date: Nov 21, 2011
Jeff, We are sure interested in attending the next fly-in. Date doesn't matter much to us, but Labor Day weekend is tougher to plan. Soon as a date is decided, we'll reserve a room. Glad to hear your son is back safe and sound. Will make for a good Thanksgiving. Hope to see Y'all there. Blue skies & tailwinds, Bob Borger Europa XS Tri, Rotax 914, Airmaster C/S Prop. Little Toot Sport Biplane, Lycoming Thunderbolt AEIO-320 EXP 3705 Lynchburg Dr. Corinth, TX 76208-5331 Cel: 817-992-1117 rlborger(at)mac.com On Nov 21, 2011, at 10:44 AM, Jeffrey Roberts wrote: > To All, > Below is a note that I received today from Rough River. I apologize not being able to make it last year as life got in the way. It seems maybe Labor day weekend may not be the best time for this event. A lot of Family commitments for all. I think this year we should consider maybe the week after or even two weeks after as we did a few years back. I seem to remember there was someone else that was considering planning the 2012 event. If so let me know or I would be happy to do it. Either way is fine but maybe we should go for a list earlier this year to see if the interest is still there. Looks like by there message below their prices have been lowered a bit. I for one will do my best to attend. My Kid is back in the states and most family emergencies have subsided... LOL! > > Regards, > > Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush > > > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: "Clark, Donna F (Parks)" <DonnaF.Clark(at)ky.gov> >> Date: November 21, 2011 10:23:08 AM CST >> To: >> Subject: question from Rough River >> >> >> Morning, >> Just checking in to see if you would like to book for September 2012 >> Lodging prices are lowerJ >> Lodge Room $80.96 >> Standard Cottage$107.96 >> Thanks >> Group Sales Coordinator >> Rough River State Dam Park >> 450 Lodge Road >> Falls of Rough Ky,40119 >> 270-257-2311 >> 1-800-325-1713 >> DonnaF.Clark(at)ky.gov >> > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 21, 2011
From: jimpuglise(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: Fwd: question from Rough River
Jeff- Later would be better for all concerned I think. The more we can push it toward the end of September, or maybe even the first part of October, the better. Jim Puglise ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeffrey Roberts" <jeff(at)rmmm.net> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 11:44:21 AM Subject: Europa-List: Fwd: question from Rough River To All, Below is a note that I received today from Rough River. I apologize not being able to make it last year as life got in the way. It seems maybe Labor day weekend may not be the best time for this event. A lot of Family commitments for all. I think this year we should consider maybe the week after or even two weeks after as we did a few years back. I seem to remember there was someone else that was considering planning the 2012 event. If so let me know or I would be happy to do it. Either way is fine but maybe we should go for a list earlier this year to see if the interest is still there. Looks like by there message below their prices have been lowered a bit. I for one will do my best to attend. My Kid is back in the states and most family emergencies have subsided... LOL! Regards, Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush Begin forwarded message: From: "Clark, Donna F (Parks)" < DonnaF.Clark(at)ky.gov > Date: November 21, 2011 10:23:08 AM CST Subject: question from Rough River Morning, Just checking in to see if you would like to book for September 2012 Lodging prices are lower J Lodge Room $80.96 Standard Cottage$107.96 Thanks Group Sales Coordinator Rough River State Dam Park 450 Lodge Road Falls of Rough Ky,40119 270-257-2311 1-800-325-1713 DonnaF.Clark(at)ky.gov ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 21, 2011
From: "ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk" <ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: Eye bolt tie down through wing/flap hinge block (trike
only) Hi! Frans/Peter/all. I would draw your attention to a simple fact that when the flaps are extended at 82 knots a large proportion of the aircraft weight is carried on the flap hinges. The hinges at the outboard end of the flaps are integral with and cured in place as part of two ribs which extend over the full width of the wing which in turn also is cured and envelopes the wing spar thus spreading any loading over a massive part of the wing structure. These structural factors are I would venture to suggest likely stronger than any integral tie down that could be separately constructed into the wing anywhere else without such considerable weight increase when an existing potential facility is already available. With regards to receiving snatch blows through the aircraft "bucking about" this is entirely without foundation since on tying down through these points it is possible to load up and deflect the main gear legs to ensure the system is constantly in tension. In conclusion I can advise that G-PTAG has always been tied down in this manner and has withstood some severe gusting wind conditions without any damage ensuing what or where ever over it's 900 hours life time. However all this advice is provided without liability as to the engineering capability suggested. In other words why don't you all do as you prefer but with the benefit of Neville Eyre's information I suggest you establish your own aircraft's integrity with regards to the type of block in use. May I thank Neville Eyre for his kind intervention on this matter and I can confirm that the blocks on G-PTAG are aluminium alloy and were part of it's original Mono Wheel Kit since the aircraft was originally built as a convertible so embodying all things Trike and Mono together. Best regards Bob Harrison G-PTAG -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list- server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Frans Veldman Sent: 21 November 2011 16:11 Subject: Re: Europa-List: Eye bolt tie down through wing/flap hinge block (trike only) nl> On 11/18/2011 08:04 PM, Bob Harrison wrote: > Hi! Herewith a photo of the tie down location on the wing/flap hinge block > on G-PTAG . Ehm, the flap hinge is designed for holding the flap in position. Tying down the aircraft with it imposes the hinge to possible jerking loads, in a different angle than the hinge is supposed to receive during its intended use. I remember some notes about not using pencil marks on this apparently sensitive and critical part. Can anyone make an educated guess whether using this part as tie down point would not compromise the attachment or strength of the hinge? Frans ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 21, 2011
From: "ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk" <ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: Flap up method for single handed rigging
Hi! Tony. You have me completely baffled . My a/c is a trike and has the electric drive flaps. However it also has a slotted link in the outboard hinge mechanism on each wing which prevents the flap from falling past fully extended position. I can not for the life of me understand why you would need to leave this hard ware out. when it serves the purpose which you are trying to solve? Regards Bob H G-PTAG -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list- server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tony Renshaw Sent: 20 November 2011 20:05 Subject: Re: Europa-List: Flap up method for single handed rigging com> Thanks Fred,Bob Graham and co re flap rigging. I will have electric flaps and could therefore rig with the flaps at any position. At the moment they will fall right out of the close out and rotate such that the trailing edge of the flap can be against the wing, because I don't have the outrigger hardware to create an extended stop. I either need to come up with an extended stop for my flaps, or rig the wing with the flaps up. Has any of the electric flap Tri-gear guys managed this other ways, or have any suggestions? Reg Tony Renshaw ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Peter Zutrauen <peterz(at)zutrasoft.com>
Date: Nov 21, 2011
Subject: Re: Eye bolt tie down through wing/flap hinge block (trike
only) All very good valid points. Thanks for the post! My concern would be with any side-loads on the brackets, but that could likely be mitigated. Cheers, Pete A239 On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:48 PM, ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk < ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk> wrote: > ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk> > > Hi! Frans/Peter/all. > I would draw your attention to a simple fact that when the flaps are > extended at 82 knots a large proportion of the aircraft weight is > carried on the flap hinges. The hinges at the outboard end of the > flaps are integral with and cured in place as part of two ribs which > extend over the full width of the wing which in turn also is cured and > envelopes the wing spar thus spreading any loading over a massive part > of the wing structure. > > These structural factors are I would venture to suggest likely > stronger than any integral tie down that could be separately > constructed into the wing anywhere else without such considerable > weight increase when an existing potential facility is already > available. > > With regards to receiving snatch blows through the aircraft "bucking > about" this is entirely without foundation since on tying down through > these points it is possible to load up and deflect the main gear legs > to ensure the system is constantly in tension. > > In conclusion I can advise that G-PTAG has always been tied down in > this manner and has withstood some severe gusting wind conditions > without any damage ensuing what or where ever over it's 900 hours life > time. However all this advice is provided without liability as to the > engineering capability suggested. In other words why don't you all do > as you prefer but with the benefit of Neville Eyre's information I > suggest you establish your own aircraft's integrity with regards to the > type of block in use. > > May I thank Neville Eyre for his kind intervention on this matter and I > can confirm that the blocks on G-PTAG are aluminium alloy and were part > of it's original Mono Wheel Kit since the aircraft was originally built > as a convertible so embodying all things Trike and Mono together. > > Best regards > > Bob Harrison G-PTAG > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list- > server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Frans Veldman > > Sent: 21 November 2011 16:11 > > To: europa-list(at)matronics.com > > Subject: Re: Europa-List: Eye bolt tie down through wing/flap hinge > block (trike only) > > > nl> > > > On 11/18/2011 08:04 PM, Bob Harrison wrote: > > > Hi! Herewith a photo of the tie down location on the wing/flap hinge > block > > > on G-PTAG . > > > Ehm, the flap hinge is designed for holding the flap in position. > Tying > > down the aircraft with it imposes the hinge to possible jerking > loads, > > in a different angle than the hinge is supposed to receive during its > > intended use. I remember some notes about not using pencil marks on > this > > apparently sensitive and critical part. Can anyone make an educated > > guess whether using this part as tie down point would not compromise > the > > attachment or strength of the hinge? > > > Frans > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 22, 2011
From: Frans Veldman <frans(at)privatepilots.nl>
Subject: Re: Eye bolt tie down through wing/flap hinge block (trike
only) Hi Bob, > I would draw your attention to a simple fact that when the flaps are > extended at 82 knots a large proportion of the aircraft weight is > carried on the flap hinges. Yes, but this load is in the opposite direction and from quite a different nature, and most likely in an angled direction whereas the flap exerts a "straight" line of load. Many of us have a "no push" or "no step" mark on the flap, while it is very unlikely that someone weighs more than the lift potential of the flap. Apparently some people feel that not all loads are of a similar nature. I'm a bit cautious, I have to admit, I couldn't help wondering about this. I just prefer to limit the use of critical parts to their intended usage. > With regards to receiving snatch blows through the aircraft "bucking > about" this is entirely without foundation since on tying down through > these points it is possible to load up and deflect the main gear legs > to ensure the system is constantly in tension. We all know what happens with the doors when they are in constant tension by the support springs: they deform. I can imagine when you load up the structure of the aircraft while being parked in the sun that it may deform a bit over time. Maybe just a millimeter, but that said, while building the airplane I did the measurements down to a precision of better than 1 millimeter. So if I tie down the aircraft I make sure not to tie any load on the wing. Downside of course is that if the airplane rocks in the wind that it will jerk on the tie downs. But I don't use the flap hinges as tie down points. But who knows? Maybe your method is better. We are just guessing here, aren't we? > In conclusion I can advise that G-PTAG has always been tied down in > this manner and has withstood some severe gusting wind conditions > without any damage ensuing what or where ever over it's 900 hours life > time. It is impressive, but no guarantee by itself that it could never have any negative consequences. You are probably right but I had an uneasy feeling when I red about it. If it was about a bicycle I would have ignored it, but we are talking airplanes here and I feel that if any of us has an uneasy feeling about something that he should bring it up. > May I thank Neville Eyre for his kind intervention on this matter and I I hope I didn't irritate you, I was just wondering whether using a critical aircraft part outside the scope of its intended usage would be safe by definition. I have to admit that I would never have thought that just a pencil mark would compromise the strength of that part either. I think it is a good thing if we discuss the safety of some ideas before they become common practice. I would really hate to read someday that one of us lost his flap during flight and that a hinge with an eyebolt was discovered some distance away from the wreckage... Especially if I remember having questioned it silently and never brought up the subject. I guess we won't be able to obtain a definite verdict on this matter, everyone should make his own decision. It is probably ok to use the flap hinge for this but you can't know for sure I think. Frans ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 22, 2011
Subject: Re: Eye bolt tie down through wing/flap hinge block (trike
only)
From: Nigel Graham <nigel_graham@m-tecque.co.uk>
Frans, Don't forget that this mounting point was originally designed and stressed to mount the outrigger on the original mono-wheel. Consider if you will, the compressive shock loads imposed by an unforgiving landing on rough grass, or the lateral loads imposed during turning. I cannot recall a single incidence of this part of the wing/flap/outrigger mounting ever failing (and there have been numerous mono groung handling "incidents"). Your arguments are however, all valid. Nigel Hi Bob, I would draw your attention to a simple fact that when the flaps are extended at 82 knots a large proportion of the aircraft weight is carried on the flap hinges. Yes, but this load is in the opposite direction and from quite a different nature, and most likely in an angled direction whereas the flap exerts a "straight" line of load. Many of us have a "no push" or "no step" mark on the flap, while it is very unlikely that someone weighs more than the lift potential of the flap. Apparently some people feel that not all loads are of a similar nature. I'm a bit cautious, I have to admit, I couldn't help wondering about this. I just prefer to limit the use of critical parts to their intended usage. With regards to receiving snatch blows through the aircraft "bucking about" this is entirely without foundation since on tying down through these points it is possible to load up and deflect the main gear legs to ensure the system is constantly in tension. We all know what happens with the doors when they are in constant tension by the support springs: they deform. I can imagine when you load up the structure of the aircraft while being parked in the sun that it may deform a bit over time. Maybe just a millimeter, but that said, while building the airplane I did the measurements down to a precision of better than 1 millimeter. So if I tie down the aircraft I make sure not to tie any load on the wing. Downside of course is that if the airplane rocks in the wind that it will jerk on the tie downs. But I don't use the flap hinges as tie down points. But who knows? Maybe your method is better. We are just guessing here, aren't we? In conclusion I can advise that G-PTAG has always been tied down in this manner and has withstood some severe gusting wind conditions without any damage ensuing what or where ever over it's 900 hours life time. It is impressive, but no guarantee by itself that it could never have any negative consequences. You are probably right but I had an uneasy feeling when I red about it. If it was about a bicycle I would have ignored it, but we are talking airplanes here and I feel that if any of us has an uneasy feeling about something that he should bring it up. May I thank Neville Eyre for his kind intervention on this matter and I I hope I didn't irritate you, I was just wondering whether using a critical aircraft part outside the scope of its intended usage would be safe by definition. I have to admit that I would never have thought that just a pencil mark would compromise the strength of that part either. I think it is a good thing if we discuss the safety of some ideas before they become common practice. I would really hate to read someday that one of us lost his flap during flight and that a hinge with an eyebolt was discovered some distance away from the wreckage... Especially if I remember having questioned it silently and never brought up the subject. I guess we won't be able to obtain a definite verdict on this matter, everyone should make his own decision. It is probably ok to use the flap hinge for this but you can't know for sure I think. Frans =========== BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; } ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flap up method for single handed rigging
From: "AirEupora" <AirEupora(at)sbcglobal.net>
Date: Nov 21, 2011
I built a telescoping square brace tubing that attaches to the tie down bolt hole. I have an over center brace that I can take the wings off my dolly and place the spar into the hole in the fuselage. I then lift the wing and straighten it out from the wing tip then slide it into the fuselage. I only have one picture, take in the rain, but can sent the measurements and some pictures. The square tubing is welded to a square legs that have 360 degrees rolls installed. The telescoping inner tube is secured with a Vise Grip pliers on each wing. I have then marked with magic marker and once I have the wings in I telescope the tube to the correct height to install the pins. I have the flap in the down position and work the wing into the fuselage to just before engaging the flaps. I hope this makes sense. I have put the wings on using this method for the last year by myself. If you want the pictures e-mail off line aireupora(at)sbcglobal.net Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=358772#358772 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_0296_104.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Andrew Sarangan <asarangan(at)gmail.com>
Date: Nov 22, 2011
Subject: Stick control movement - how many degrees?
It seems the suggested 5-7mm gap between the CS08 crank and the cockpit floor may cause interference of the control stick. Some builders have suggested increasing this gap. I hate guessing how much gap to leave, so it would help if I knew how many degrees the stick is expected to swing for a full left or right deflection. Does anyone have this information, or willing to check for me? Thanks! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 22, 2011
From: Frans Veldman <frans(at)privatepilots.nl>
Subject: Re: Eye bolt tie down through wing/flap hinge block (trike
only) On 11/22/2011 01:35 AM, Nigel Graham wrote: > Don't forget that this mounting point was originally designed and > stressed to mount the outrigger on the original mono-wheel. Consider if > you will, the compressive shock loads imposed by an unforgiving landing > on rough grass, Yes, I realize that. But what is the duration of a landing roll compared to a whole night in constant movement due to the wind? it is unlikely that you will experience metal fatigue just due to the landings, but how about prolonged rocking in the wind? Isn't this the same reason why we try to restrain the flight controls while parked in the wind? Normal rudder use is different than constant movement due to the wind, although the movement by itself is similar. > or the lateral loads imposed during turning. I don't have a mono but I think the lateral load is taken up solely by the main gear, and the outrigger just keeps the wing of the ground. I doubt that the hinge attach points will see any sideways loads at all during their life, that is, if they are used for their intended purposes only. It is just a piece of metal sticking out of the wing, I can imagine that it can easily develop metal fatigue just at the edge where it protrudes if you wiggle it long enough. The material and the construction both indicate that it is not designed for this kind of movement, but I'm not a metallurgist so I could be wrong. Frans ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Gerry Holland <gholland@content-stream.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Eye bolt tie down through wing/flap hinge block (trike
only)
Date: Nov 22, 2011
Regarding laterals loads on outriggers. Watching a Europa Mono turn or manoeuvre on the ground and especially grass is a torturous sight. Being pull backwards, even worse. The nylon often bends way out of true and that must inflict loads to the mountings. They seem sufficient in that case. I fitted tie down eyes to the outboard Flap fixings on a Trigear. Based on the insight of that fixing area when building it, I think it has a good strength capability and doesn't compromise long term fixing. All of this is my ageing and confused opinion! Regards Gerry ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Christoph Both <christoph.both(at)acadiau.ca>
Subject: Flap up method for single handed rigging
Date: Nov 22, 2011
Hi, I use a piece of duct tape holding the flaps temporarily in place (all up) while rigging single-handedly having set the electric flap position (TRI) to full "up". The flap pin meets the bushing proper. Once rigged I tear the duct tape off, for next time. Christoph Both #223, Wolfville, Nova Scotia -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 6:51 PM Subject: RE: Europa-List: Flap up method for single handed rigging Hi! Tony. You have me completely baffled . My a/c is a trike and has the electric drive flaps. However it also has a slotted link in the outboard hinge mechanism on each wing which prevents the flap from falling past fully extended position. I can not for the life of me understand why you would need to leave this hard ware out. when it serves the purpose which you are trying to solve? Regards Bob H G-PTAG -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list- server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tony Renshaw Sent: 20 November 2011 20:05 Subject: Re: Europa-List: Flap up method for single handed rigging com> Thanks Fred,Bob Graham and co re flap rigging. I will have electric flaps and could therefore rig with the flaps at any position. At the moment they will fall right out of the close out and rotate such that the trailing edge of the flap can be against the wing, because I don't have the outrigger hardware to create an extended stop. I either need to come up with an extended stop for my flaps, or rig the wing with the flaps up. Has any of the electric flap Tri-gear guys managed this other ways, or have any suggestions? Reg Tony Renshaw ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Peter Jeffers" <pjeffers(at)talktalk.net>
Subject: Fwd: question from Rough River
Date: Nov 22, 2011
Hi all, Sue and I are UK Europa owner/flyers and we visited the Rough River fly in (not in our Europa) two years ago. We had a great time albeit with no Europas due weather. We would very much like to attend again but leaving the UK before the later part of September is not practical. We normally holiday in Florida in the Autunm so would like to be able to combine that with Rough River. So yes we would like to request as late as possible in September or early October. It may also encourage one or two other Europeans to attend. Just a thought. Pete _____ From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of jimpuglise(at)comcast.net Sent: 21 November 2011 20:54 Subject: Re: Europa-List: Fwd: question from Rough River Jeff- Later would be better for all concerned I think. The more we can push it toward the end of September, or maybe even the first part of October, the better. Jim Puglise _____ From: "Jeffrey Roberts" <jeff(at)rmmm.net> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 11:44:21 AM Subject: Europa-List: Fwd: question from Rough River To All, Below is a note that I received today from Rough River. I apologize not being able to make it last year as life got in the way. It seems maybe Labor day weekend may not be the best time for this event. A lot of Family commitments for all. I think this year we should consider maybe the week after or even two weeks after as we did a few years back. I seem to remember there was someone else that was considering planning the 2012 event. If so let me know or I would be happy to do it. Either way is fine but maybe we should go for a list earlier this year to see if the interest is still there. Looks like by there message below their prices have been lowered a bit. I for one will do my best to attend. My Kid is back in the states and most family emergencies have subsided... LOL! Regards, Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush Begin forwarded message: From: "Clark, Donna F (Parks)" <DonnaF.Clark(at)ky.gov> Date: November 21, 2011 10:23:08 AM CST Subject: question from Rough River Morning, Just checking in to see if you would like to book for September 2012 Lodging prices are lower:-) Lodge Room $80.96 Standard Cottage$107.96 Thanks Group Sales Coordinator Rough River State Dam Park 450 Lodge Road Falls of Rough Ky,40119 270-257-2311 1-800-325-1713 DonnaF.Clark(at)ky.gov _blank">www.aeroelectric.com " target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com ="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution arget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution _____ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jeffrey Roberts <jeff(at)rmmm.net>
Subject: Re: Fwd: question from Rough River
Date: Nov 22, 2011
Getting us a latter date shouldn't be a problem. Before I book it, how about we take a quick survey. I'll list the weekends here. Just vote as I have done and this will give us all a feel as to who will try and make it and what are the best dates. As they say you can't please everyone but maybe we can work towards it. Please keep in mind weather could start being more of a factor as we get close to October. Then again??? September Weekends. - Vote / Name 7th & 8th... 15th & 16th... Jeff R Gold Rush 22nd & 23rd... 28th & 29th... October 5th & 6th... On Nov 22, 2011, at 8:15 AM, Peter Jeffers wrote: > Hi all, > Sue and I are UK Europa owner/flyers and we visited the Rough River fly in (not in our Europa) two years ago. We had a great time albeit with no Europas due weather. We would very much like to attend again but leaving the UK before the later part of September is not practical. We normally holiday in Florida in the Autunm so would like to be able to combine that with Rough River. > So yes we would like to request as late as possible in September or early October. It may also encourage one or two other Europeans to attend. > Just a thought. > > Pete > > From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of jimpuglise(at)comcast.net > Sent: 21 November 2011 20:54 > To: europa-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: Europa-List: Fwd: question from Rough River > > Jeff- > > Later would be better for all concerned I think. The more we can push it toward the end of September, or maybe even the first part of October, the better. > > Jim Puglise > > From: "Jeffrey Roberts" <jeff(at)rmmm.net> > To: europa-list(at)matronics.com > Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 11:44:21 AM > Subject: Europa-List: Fwd: question from Rough River > > To All, > Below is a note that I received today from Rough River. I apologize not being able to make it last year as life got in the way. It seems maybe Labor day weekend may not be the best time for this event. A lot of Family commitments for all. I think this year we should consider maybe the week after or even two weeks after as we did a few years back. I seem to remember there was someone else that was considering planning the 2012 event. If so let me know or I would be happy to do it. Either way is fine but maybe we should go for a list earlier this year to see if the interest is still there. Looks like by there message below their prices have been lowered a bit. I for one will do my best to attend. My Kid is back in the states and most family emergencies have subsided... LOL! > > Regards, > > Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush > > > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > From: "Clark, Donna F (Parks)" <DonnaF.Clark(at)ky.gov> > Date: November 21, 2011 10:23:08 AM CST > To: > Subject: question from Rough River > > > > Morning, > Just checking in to see if you would like to book for September 2012 > Lodging prices are lowerJ > Lodge Room $80.96 > Standard Cottage$107.96 > Thanks > Group Sales Coordinator > Rough River State Dam Park > 450 Lodge Road > Falls of Rough Ky,40119 > 270-257-2311 > 1-800-325-1713 > DonnaF.Clark(at)ky.gov > > > > > _blank">www.aeroelectric.com > " target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com > ="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com > _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > arget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List > tp://forums.matronics.com > _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > > > www.buildersbooks.com > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List > http://forums.matronics.com > http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > 11/21/11 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 22, 2011
From: jimpuglise(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: Fwd: question from Rough River
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeffrey Roberts" <jeff(at)rmmm.net> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 10:05:42 AM Subject: Re: Europa-List: Fwd: question from Rough River Getting us a latter date shouldn't be a problem. Before I book it, how about we take a quick survey. I'll list the weekends here. Just vote as I have done and this will give us all a feel as to who will try and make it and what are the best dates. As they say you can't please everyone but maybe we can work towards it. Please keep in mind weather could start being more of a factor as we get close to October. Then again??? September Weekends. - Vote / Name 7th & 8th... 15th & 16th... Jeff R Gold Rush 22nd & 23rd... 28th & 29th... October 5th & 6th... Jim and Lynne N283JL On Nov 22, 2011, at 8:15 AM, Peter Jeffers wrote: Hi all, Sue and I are UK Europa owner/flyers and we visited the Rough River fly in (not in our Europa) two years ago. We had a great time albeit with no Europas due weather. We would very much like to attend again but leaving the UK before the later part of September is not practical. We normally holiday in Florida in the Autunm so would like to be able to combine that with Rough River. So yes we would like to request as late as possible in September or early October. It may also encourage one or two other Europeans to attend. Just a thought. Pete From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of jimpuglise(at)comcast.net Sent: 21 November 2011 20:54 Subject: Re: Europa-List: Fwd: question from Rough River Jeff- Later would be better for all concerned I think. The more we can push it toward the end of September, or maybe even the first part of October, the better. Jim Puglise ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeffrey Roberts" < jeff(at)rmmm.net > Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 11:44:21 AM Subject: Europa-List: Fwd: question from Rough River To All, Below is a note that I received today from Rough River. I apologize not being able to make it last year as life got in the way. It seems maybe Labor day weekend may not be the best time for this event. A lot of Family commitments for all. I think this year we should consider maybe the week after or even two weeks after as we did a few years back. I seem to remember there was someone else that was considering planning the 2012 event. If so let me know or I would be happy to do it. Either way is fine but maybe we should go for a list earlier this year to see if the interest is still there. Looks like by there message below their prices have been lowered a bit. I for one will do my best to attend. My Kid is back in the states and most family emergencies have subsided... LOL! Regards, Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush Begin forwarded message:
From: "Clark, Donna F (Parks)" < DonnaF.Clark(at)ky.gov > Date: November 21, 2011 10:23:08 AM CST Subject: question from Rough River Morning, Just checking in to see if you would like to book for September 2012 Lodging prices are lower J Lodge Room $80.96 Standard Cottage$107.96 Thanks Group Sales Coordinator Rough River State Dam Park 450 Lodge Road Falls of Rough Ky,40119 270-257-2311 1-800-325-1713 DonnaF.Clark(at)ky.gov _blank">www.aeroelectric.com " target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com ="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution arget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution www.buildersbooks.com http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List http://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/contribution No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 11/21/11 href="http://www.aeroelectric.com/">www.aeroelectric.com href="http://www.buildersbooks.com/">www.buildersbooks.com href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com/">www.homebuilthelp.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List href="http://forums.matronics.com/">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fwd: question from Rough River
From: Robert Borger <rlborger(at)mac.com>
Date: Nov 22, 2011
Jeff, Any of the dates are fine with us. Blue skies & tailwinds, Bob Borger Europa XS Tri, Rotax 914, Airmaster C/S Prop. Little Toot Sport Biplane, Lycoming Thunderbolt AEIO-320 EXP 3705 Lynchburg Dr. Corinth, TX 76208-5331 Cel: 817-992-1117 rlborger(at)mac.com On Nov 22, 2011, at 9:05 AM, Jeffrey Roberts wrote: > Getting us a latter date shouldn't be a problem. Before I book it, how about we take a quick survey. I'll list the weekends here. Just vote as I have done and this will give us all a feel as to who will try and make it and what are the best dates. As they say you can't please everyone but maybe we can work towards it. Please keep in mind weather could start being more of a factor as we get close to October. Then again??? > > September Weekends. - Vote / Name > > > 7th & 8th... > > 15th & 16th... Jeff R Gold Rush > > 22nd & 23rd... > > 28th & 29th... > > October > > 5th & 6th... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Peter Jeffers" <pjeffers(at)talktalk.net>
Subject: Fwd: question from Rough River
Date: Nov 22, 2011
_____ From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Roberts Sent: 22 November 2011 15:06 Subject: Re: Europa-List: Fwd: question from Rough River Getting us a latter date shouldn't be a problem. Before I book it, how about we take a quick survey. I'll list the weekends here. Just vote as I have done and this will give us all a feel as to who will try and make it and what are the best dates. As they say you can't please everyone but maybe we can work towards it. Please keep in mind weather could start being more of a factor as we get close to October. Then again??? September Weekends. - Vote / Name 7th & 8th... 15th & 16th... Jeff R Gold Rush 22nd & 23rd... 28th & 29th... Pete & Sue Jeffers Choice 2 October 5th & 6th... Pete & Sue Jeffers (UK) Choice 1 On Nov 22, 2011, at 8:15 AM, Peter Jeffers wrote: Hi all, Sue and I are UK Europa owner/flyers and we visited the Rough River fly in (not in our Europa) two years ago. We had a great time albeit with no Europas due weather. We would very much like to attend again but leaving the UK before the later part of September is not practical. We normally holiday in Florida in the Autunm so would like to be able to combine that with Rough River. So yes we would like to request as late as possible in September or early October. It may also encourage one or two other Europeans to attend. Just a thought. Pete _____ From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of jimpuglise(at)comcast.net Sent: 21 November 2011 20:54 Subject: Re: Europa-List: Fwd: question from Rough River Jeff- Later would be better for all concerned I think. The more we can push it toward the end of September, or maybe even the first part of October, the better. Jim Puglise _____ From: "Jeffrey Roberts" <jeff(at)rmmm.net> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 11:44:21 AM Subject: Europa-List: Fwd: question from Rough River To All, Below is a note that I received today from Rough River. I apologize not being able to make it last year as life got in the way. It seems maybe Labor day weekend may not be the best time for this event. A lot of Family commitments for all. I think this year we should consider maybe the week after or even two weeks after as we did a few years back. I seem to remember there was someone else that was considering planning the 2012 event. If so let me know or I would be happy to do it. Either way is fine but maybe we should go for a list earlier this year to see if the interest is still there. Looks like by there message below their prices have been lowered a bit. I for one will do my best to attend. My Kid is back in the states and most family emergencies have subsided... LOL! Regards, Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush Begin forwarded message: From: "Clark, Donna F (Parks)" <DonnaF.Clark(at)ky.gov> Date: November 21, 2011 10:23:08 AM CST Subject: question from Rough River Morning, Just checking in to see if you would like to book for September 2012 Lodging prices are lower:-) Lodge Room $80.96 Standard Cottage$107.96 Thanks Group Sales Coordinator Rough River State Dam Park 450 Lodge Road Falls of Rough Ky,40119 270-257-2311 1-800-325-1713 DonnaF.Clark(at)ky.gov _blank">www.aeroelectric.com " target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com ="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution arget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution <http://www.buildersbooks.com/> www.buildersbooks.com <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List <http://forums.matronics.com> http://forums.matronics.com <http://www.matronics.com/contribution> http://www.matronics.com/contribution www.aeroelectric.com _____ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 22, 2011
From: hagargs <hagargs(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Stick control movement - how many degrees?
It depends on how fat your legs are. No matter how far the stick swings its not going to get past your legs when you are sitting in the seat. Steve Hagar -----Original Message----- >From: Andrew Sarangan <asarangan(at)gmail.com> >Sent: Nov 21, 2011 10:01 PM >To: Europa List >Subject: Europa-List: Stick control movement - how many degrees? > > >It seems the suggested 5-7mm gap between the CS08 crank and the >cockpit floor may cause interference of the control stick. Some >builders have suggested increasing this gap. I hate guessing how much >gap to leave, so it would help if I knew how many degrees the stick is >expected to swing for a full left or right deflection. Does anyone >have this information, or willing to check for me? >Thanks! > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 22, 2011
From: Jeff B <topglock(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Fwd: question from Rough River
Jeff, I'm good with whatever... Jeff - Baby Blue On 11/22/2011 9:14 AM, jimpuglise(at)comcast.net wrote: > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From: *"Jeffrey Roberts" <jeff(at)rmmm.net> > *To: *europa-list(at)matronics.com > *Sent: *Tuesday, November 22, 2011 10:05:42 AM > *Subject: *Re: Europa-List: Fwd: question from Rough River > > Getting us a latter date shouldn't be a problem. Before I book it, how > about we take a quick survey. I'll list the weekends here. Just vote as > I have done and this will give us all a feel as to who will try and make > it and what are the best dates. As they say you can't please everyone > but maybe we can work towards it. Please keep in mind weather could > start being more of a factor as we get close to October. Then again??? > > September Weekends. - Vote / Name > > > 7th & 8th... > > 15th & 16th... Jeff R Gold Rush > > 22nd & 23rd... > > 28th & 29th... > > October > > 5th & 6th... Jim and Lynne N283JL > > > On Nov 22, 2011, at 8:15 AM, Peter Jeffers wrote: > > Hi all, > > Sue and I are UK Europa owner/flyers and we visited the Rough River > fly in (not in our Europa) two years ago. We had a great time albeit > with no Europas due weather. We would very much like to attend again > but leaving the UK before the later part of September is not > practical. We normally holiday in Florida in the Autunm so would > like to be able to combine that with Rough River. > > So yes we would like to request as late as possible in September or > early October. It may also encourage one or two other Europeans to > attend. > > Just a thought. > > Pete > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:*owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com > > [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of > *jimpuglise(at)comcast.net > *Sent:* 21 November 2011 20:54 > *To:* europa-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* Re: Europa-List: Fwd: question from Rough River > > Jeff- > > Later would be better for all concerned I think. The more we can > push it toward the end of September, or maybe even the first part of > October, the better. > > Jim Puglise > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From: *"Jeffrey Roberts" <jeff(at)rmmm.net <mailto:jeff(at)rmmm.net>> > *To: *europa-list(at)matronics.com > *Sent: *Monday, November 21, 2011 11:44:21 AM > *Subject: *Europa-List: Fwd: question from Rough River > > To All, > > Below is a note that I received today from Rough River. I apologize > not being able to make it last year as life got in the way. It seems > maybe Labor day weekend may not be the best time for this event. A > lot of Family commitments for all. I think this year we should > consider maybe the week after or even two weeks after as we did a > few years back. I seem to remember there was someone else that was > considering planning the 2012 event. If so let me know or I would be > happy to do it. Either way is fine but maybe we should go for a list > earlier this year to see if the interest is still there. Looks like > by there message below their prices have been lowered a bit. I for > one will do my best to attend. My Kid is back in the states and most > family emergencies have subsided... LOL! > > Regards, > > Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush > > Begin forwarded message: > > *From: *"Clark, Donna F (Parks)" <DonnaF.Clark(at)ky.gov > > > > *Date: *November 21, 2011 10:23:08 AM CST > > *To: *> > > *Subject: question from Rough River* > > > Morning, > > Just checking in to see if you would like to book for September 2012 > > Lodging prices are lowerJ > > Lodge Room $80.96 > > Standard Cottage$107.96 > > Thanks > > Group Sales Coordinator > > RoughRiver State Dam Park > > 450 Lodge Road > > Fallsof RoughKy,40119 > > 270-257-2311 > > 1-800-325-1713 > > DonnaF.Clark(at)ky.gov > > * * > > * * > > *_blank">www.aeroelectric.com* > > *" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com* > > *="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com* > > *_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution* > > *arget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List* > > *tp://forums.matronics.com * > > *_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution* > > * * > > * * > > * * > > ** > > ** > > ** > > ** > > *www.buildersbooks.com <http://www.buildersbooks.com/>* > > ** > > ** > > ** > > *http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List* > > ** > > ** > > *http://forums.matronics.com* > > ** > > ** > > *http://www.matronics.com/contribution* > > * * > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/> > 11/21/11 > > * > > href="http://www.aeroelectric.com/">www.aeroelectric.com > href="http://www.buildersbooks.com/">www.buildersbooks.com > href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com/">www.homebuilthelp.com > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List > href="http://forums.matronics.com/">http://forums.matronics.com > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > * > > > * > > _blank">www.aeroelectric.com > " target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com > ="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com > _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > arget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List > tp://forums.matronics.com > _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > * > > * > > > * ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Gary Leinberger <Gary.Leinberger(at)millersville.edu>
Date: Nov 22, 2011
Subject: Fwd: question from Rough River
Any of those dates work for me - although I would prefer it not be Labor Da y weekend Gary Leinberger From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-serv er(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Peter Jeffers Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 10:40 AM Subject: RE: Europa-List: Fwd: question from Rough River ________________________________ From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com<mailto:owner-europa-list-serve r(at)matronics.com> [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Roberts Sent: 22 November 2011 15:06 Subject: Re: Europa-List: Fwd: question from Rough River Getting us a latter date shouldn't be a problem. Before I book it, how abou t we take a quick survey. I'll list the weekends here. Just vote as I have done and this will give us all a feel as to who will try and make it and wh at are the best dates. As they say you can't please everyone but maybe we c an work towards it. Please keep in mind weather could start being more of a factor as we get close to October. Then again??? September Weekends. - Vote / Name 7th & 8th... 15th & 16th... Jeff R Gold Rush 22nd & 23rd... 28th & 29th... Pete & Sue Jeffers Choice 2 October 5th & 6th... Pete & Sue Jeffers (UK) Choice 1 On Nov 22, 2011, at 8:15 AM, Peter Jeffers wrote: Hi all, Sue and I are UK Europa owner/flyers and we visited the Rough River fly in (not in our Europa) two years ago. We had a great time albeit with no Euro pas due weather. We would very much like to attend again but leaving the U K before the later part of September is not practical. We normally holiday in Florida in the Autunm so would like to be able to combine that with Rou gh River. So yes we would like to request as late as possible in September or early O ctober. It may also encourage one or two other Europeans to attend. Just a thought. Pete ________________________________ From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com<mailto:owner-europa-list-serve r(at)matronics.com> [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of jimpuglise@comca st.net Sent: 21 November 2011 20:54 Subject: Re: Europa-List: Fwd: question from Rough River Jeff- Later would be better for all concerned I think. The more we can push it t oward the end of September, or maybe even the first part of October, the be tter. Jim Puglise ________________________________ From: "Jeffrey Roberts" <jeff(at)rmmm.net<mailto:jeff(at)rmmm.net>> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 11:44:21 AM Subject: Europa-List: Fwd: question from Rough River To All, Below is a note that I received today from Rough River. I apologize not bei ng able to make it last year as life got in the way. It seems maybe Labor d ay weekend may not be the best time for this event. A lot of Family commitm ents for all. I think this year we should consider maybe the week after or even two weeks after as we did a few years back. I seem to remember there was someone else that was considering planning the 2012 event. If so let me know or I would be happy to do it. Either way is fine but maybe we should go for a list earlier this year to see if the interest is still there. Look s like by there message below their prices have been lowered a bit. I for o ne will do my best to attend. My Kid is back in the states and most family emergencies have subsided... LOL! Regards, Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush Begin forwarded message: From: "Clark, Donna F (Parks)" <DonnaF.Clark(at)ky.gov<mailto:DonnaF.Clark(at)ky. gov>> Date: November 21, 2011 10:23:08 AM CST Subject: question from Rough River Morning, Just checking in to see if you would like to book for September 2012 Lodging prices are lower:) Lodge Room $80.96 Standard Cottage$107.96 Thanks Group Sales Coordinator Rough River State Dam Park 450 Lodge Road Falls of Rough Ky,40119 270-257-2311 1-800-325-1713 DonnaF.Clark(at)ky.gov _blank">www.aeroelectric.com<http://www.aeroelectric.com> " target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com<http://www.buildersbooks.com> ="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com<http://www.homebuilthelp.com> _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution arget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution www.buildersbooks.com<http://www.buildersbooks.com/> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List http://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/contribution www.aeroelectric.com<http://www.aeroelectric.com> www.homebuilthelp.com<http://www.homebuilthelp.com> http://www.matronics.com/contribution ________________________________ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com> 11/22/11 rsbooks.com> m> ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gavin and Anne Lee" <gavanne(at)iconz.co.nz>
Subject: Eye bolt tie down through wing/flap hinge block (trike
only)
Date: Nov 23, 2011
The Europa sits very nicely in the wind, it might rock around a bit but it's important that the tie down ropes are only loosely tied with some slack, it's rare that the wind will blow hard enough to move the aircraft, (on grass anyway), In 3 years of tying down a Europa at out stations I've never had it pull up hard against the tie downs so they are not under continuous stress, mainly there for the odd gust that might come through. Depends where you live and what your weather patterns are of course Gavin Lee..............ZK-EPA -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Frans Veldman Sent: Tuesday, 22 November 2011 11:28 p.m. Subject: Re: Europa-List: Eye bolt tie down through wing/flap hinge block (trike only) --> On 11/22/2011 01:35 AM, Nigel Graham wrote: > Don't forget that this mounting point was originally designed and > stressed to mount the outrigger on the original mono-wheel. Consider > if you will, the compressive shock loads imposed by an unforgiving > landing on rough grass, Yes, I realize that. But what is the duration of a landing roll compared to a whole night in constant movement due to the wind? it is unlikely that you will experience metal fatigue just due to the landings, but how about prolonged rocking in the wind? Isn't this the same reason why we try to restrain the flight controls while parked in the wind? Normal rudder use is different than constant movement due to the wind, although the movement by itself is similar. > or the lateral loads imposed during turning. I don't have a mono but I think the lateral load is taken up solely by the main gear, and the outrigger just keeps the wing of the ground. I doubt that the hinge attach points will see any sideways loads at all during their life, that is, if they are used for their intended purposes only. It is just a piece of metal sticking out of the wing, I can imagine that it can easily develop metal fatigue just at the edge where it protrudes if you wiggle it long enough. The material and the construction both indicate that it is not designed for this kind of movement, but I'm not a metallurgist so I could be wrong. Frans ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Wiring connectors
From: Tony Renshaw <tonyrenshaw268(at)gmail.com>
Date: Nov 22, 2011
Giddy, I am in LA and figure I might as well give Aircraft Spruce some of my hard earned dollars. I am thinking of buying a 1000' spool of AWG 20 wire and am after advice whether the spade crimp styled connectors are ok for permanent conx? I am not good with electrons. They think like my wife, often changing their minds with unpredictable outcomes. I don't enjoy them, electrons. I can barely tolerate the wife either, but she does let me build my plane so I suppose I should cut her some slack. So, within the Spruce range as I am "Johnny on the spot", is there a simple type of connector such as AMP or is there a better type, dimple or no dimple etc? Any help would be appreciated. P.S if anyone has anything bad to say about a SIRS Navigator Compass let me know as I am planning on getting one of those too. Reg Tony Renshaw Sydney, though in LA. Sent from my iPad ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rob Housman" <rob@hyperion-ef.com>
Subject: Wiring connectors
Date: Nov 22, 2011
If you were monitoring the AeroElectric-List you would have learned that crimped Faston-type connections are the best way to go for permanent air-tight connections for our airplanes. Forget solder and avoid those screw terminal strips supplied by Europa. Best regards, Rob Housman Irvine, California Europa XS Rotax 914 S/N A070 Airframe complete Avionics soon -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tony Renshaw Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 3:34 PM Subject: Europa-List: Wiring connectors --> Giddy, I am in LA and figure I might as well give Aircraft Spruce some of my hard earned dollars. I am thinking of buying a 1000' spool of AWG 20 wire and am after advice whether the spade crimp styled connectors are ok for permanent conx? I am not good with electrons. They think like my wife, often changing their minds with unpredictable outcomes. I don't enjoy them, electrons. I can barely tolerate the wife either, but she does let me build my plane so I suppose I should cut her some slack. So, within the Spruce range as I am "Johnny on the spot", is there a simple type of connector such as AMP or is there a better type, dimple or no dimple etc? Any help would be appreciated. P.S if anyone has anything bad to say about a SIRS Navigator Compass let me know as I am planning on getting one of those too. Reg Tony Renshaw Sydney, though in LA. Sent from my iPad ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wiring connectors
From: Robert Borger <rlborger(at)mac.com>
Date: Nov 22, 2011
Tony, FWIW, I use crimp fast-on spade connectors as much as possible: switches, relays, etc. Crimp ring terminals for circuit breakers and when I have a switch with screw attachments. Crimp pins & sockets in D-Sub connectors. And soldering only when absolutely, positively necessary and there's no other alternative available. Dimple fast-on spade connectors probably more secure. Nothing negative (or positive) to say about the SIRS Navigator Compass, just make sure you confirm that you get one for the Southern Hemisphere. Blue skies & tailwinds, Bob Borger Europa XS Tri, Rotax 914, Airmaster C/S Prop. Little Toot Sport Biplane, Lycoming Thunderbolt AEIO-320 EXP 3705 Lynchburg Dr. Corinth, TX 76208-5331 Cel: 817-992-1117 rlborger(at)mac.com On Nov 22, 2011, at 5:33 PM, Tony Renshaw wrote: > > Giddy, I am in LA and figure I might as well give Aircraft Spruce some of my hard earned dollars. I am thinking of buying a 1000' spool of AWG 20 wire and am after advice whether the spade crimp styled connectors are ok for permanent conx? I am not good with electrons. They think like my wife, often changing their minds with unpredictable outcomes. I don't enjoy them, electrons. I can barely tolerate the wife either, but she does let me build my plane so I suppose I should cut her some slack. So, within the Spruce range as I am "Johnny on the spot", is there a simple type of connector such as AMP or is there a better type, dimple or no dimple etc? Any help would be appreciated. > P.S if anyone has anything bad to say about a SIRS Navigator Compass let me know as I am planning on getting one of those too. > Reg > Tony Renshaw > Sydney, though in LA. > > Sent from my iPad ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wiring connectors
From: "pestar" <peter(at)reivernet.com>
Date: Nov 22, 2011
Tony Used Spade connectors in MCR-4S, using proper crimping tool as recommended by Electric Bob. for 20 & 22 AWG just doubled up the wire to get a better grip where required. Soldering only used where there was no alternative. Cheers Peter -------- Peter Armstrong Auckland, New Zealand DynAero MCR-4S (Do not shoot me :) ). Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=358910#358910 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 23, 2011
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Contributions Down By 20%...
Dear Listers, As of today, Contributions to the Matronics List Fund Raiser are lagging behind last year at this time by roughly 20%. I have a Fund Raiser each year simply to cover my operating costs for the Lists. I *do not* accept any advertising income to support the Lists and rely solely on the Contributions of members to keep the expenses paid. I run all of my own servers and they are housed here locally, and the Internet connection is a commercial-grade, T1 connection with public address space. I also maintain a full backup system that does nightly backups of all List-related data so that in the event of a server crash, all of the Lists and the many years of List archive data could be restored onto a new server in a matter of hours. All of this costs a fair amount of money, not to mention a significant amount of my personal time. I have a Fund Raiser each year to cover these costs and I ask that members that feel they receive a benefit from my investments make a modest Contribution each year to support the continued operation and upgrade of these services. If you enjoy the Lists, please make a Contribution today. I also offer some incentive gifts for larger Contribution levels. At the Contribution Web Site, you can use a credit card, Paypal, or personal check to show your support for the continuation of these services: http://www.matronics.com/contribution Or, drop a personal check in the mail to: Matt Dralle / Matronics 581 Jeannie Way Livermore CA 94550 Thank you for your support! Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fwd: question from Rough River
From: "h&jeuropa" <butcher43(at)att.net>
Date: Nov 23, 2011
The big Canard Fly In is Sept 28-30. The KY EAA Fly In and GlaStar Fly In are weekend of Sept 8. September Weekends. - Vote / Name 7th & 8th... 15th & 16th... Jeff R Gold Rush 22nd & 23rd... Jim & Heather N241BW (2nd choice) 28th & 29th... October 5th & 6th... Jim and Lynne N283JL , Jim & Heather N241BW (1st choice) Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=358988#358988 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wiring connectors
From: "rampil" <ira.rampil(at)gmail.com>
Date: Nov 23, 2011
Crimping is the way to go for most of the power circuits in the Europa. It is extremely important to purchase and use only Aviation grade crimp, not the automotive grade commonly available locally. The Aviation grade connectors, like "PIDG" are closed barrel with the metal internal sleeve extending up the barrel to support the insulation. In Auto grade connectors, the metal sleeve stops deep inside the barrel and only grips the bare wire. These connectors fail with vibration. The Europa needs some wire gauges other than 20ga. Again, choose the right colored connector for the wire gauge. I bought ring crimp connectors for up to 4-0 welding cable for the lines from my battery to contactor to starter for example. Cheers, Ira -------- Ira N224XS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=359012#359012 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Fred Klein <fklein(at)orcasonline.com>
Subject: RR2012 dates
Date: Nov 23, 2011
I asked my TN weather GURU, John Lawton, for his thoughts about dates for a Rough River Europa gathering...he responded by writing: > Usually, fall is the driest part of the year. Mid to late September > is usually a good choice unless we have a storm (hurricane) come up > out of the gulf. The local hang gliding club schedules their annual > contest in late September and they usually have decent weather. > Ordinarily, by, by mid September the daily convective T-storms are > pretty much done for the season and the heavy, set in rains like > we're seeing now that happen later in the fall haven't started yet. > So, my first choice would be mid to late September. The next best > time would be early to mid May. If you go much later than say, May > 20th, we're starting to get into the convective season and the > potential for getting rained out is considerably higher. It's also > hotter and more humid after about May 20th or so. If you go earlier > than say May 10th it can be windy. If memory serves, we've been at the effect of one of those storms out of the gulf before which reduced aircraft attendance to just 2 or 3... Let's factor in weather when setting our date, Fred ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bud Yerly" <budyerly(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Wiring connectors
Date: Nov 23, 2011
Tony, Pidge connectors and the proper crimping tool is the way to go. Bob Knuckles of Aeroelectric fame is a lover of spade connectors, I hate them as they tend to be very hard to disengage with fat fingers in a dark hole inside an airplane. I prefer ring terminals which are terrible to get a screw driver on in the dark in a hole in a panel. No matter what you decide, please buy a quality crimping tool for Pidge style connectors ( I spent $100 and mine is perfect, but not for a one time use) or better yet get a good crimping tool and practice. I prefer AMP connectors, and the circular AMP or now Tyco Amp plastic circular connectors. For a crimp tool the AMP pro crimper at A/C Spruce is very good and very expensive. Eclipse has a good crimper with various heads, but do some hand strengthening exercises to use it. Cost is about $40 and heads are also about $40 for Pidge, standard, Coax etc. I suggest you look on line at Allied or Digikey for tools and Dsub connectors. Again, I have a pair of crimpers that I only use as I do not want to lose them. I can make 100 crimps and only have one bad one. (I test each one anyway) and have found the Eclipse Dsub pin crimper to be quite good, but watch your wire size. 20 Ga, through 18 Ga works well with the Eclipse, but you need a good AMP with the proper die to do the really small 24-26 wires, but you can make do with cheaper ones. Enjoy your stay. Regards, Bud Yerly Custom Flight Creations, Inc. www.customflightcreations.com<http://www.customflightcreations.com/> (813) 653-4989 ----- Original Message ----- From: Tony Renshaw<mailto:tonyrenshaw268(at)gmail.com> To: europa-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 6:33 PM Subject: Europa-List: Wiring connectors > Giddy, I am in LA and figure I might as well give Aircraft Spruce some of my hard earned dollars. I am thinking of buying a 1000' spool of AWG 20 wire and am after advice whether the spade crimp styled connectors are ok for permanent conx? I am not good with electrons. They think like my wife, often changing their minds with unpredictable outcomes. I don't enjoy them, electrons. I can barely tolerate the wife either, but she does let me build my plane so I suppose I should cut her some slack. So, within the Spruce range as I am "Johnny on the spot", is there a simple type of connector such as AMP or is there a better type, dimple or no dimple etc? Any help would be appreciated. P.S if anyone has anything bad to say about a SIRS Navigator Compass let me know as I am planning on getting one of those too. Reg Tony Renshaw Sydney, though in LA. Sent from my iPad www.aeroelectric.com<http://www.aeroelectric.com/> www.buildersbooks.com<http://www.buildersbooks.com/> www.homebuilthelp.com<http://www.homebuilthelp.com/> http://www.matronics.com/contribution on> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List avigator?Europa-List> http://www.matronics.com/contribution on> ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 24, 2011
Subject: Any idea what this is?
From: Carl Meek <carlmeek(at)gmail.com>
My engineer just found this floating around in the belly of the aircraft, h e was quite worried it could get entangled somewhere and jam a control. The question is=8A. What is it? Did it do something important? Thanks, -Carl. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Any idea what this is?
From: "h&jeuropa" <butcher43(at)att.net>
Date: Nov 24, 2011
Looks like the starboard spar socket - the one attached to the fiberglass behind the seat (the tip of port spar slides in and pin goes through it). Part # S02, install instructions on page 14-2. It makes rigging easier by capturing the tip of the port wing spar. Don't think it is particularly structural but it shouldn't remain where it is now . ;-) Jim & Heather Butcher N241BW Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=359101#359101 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Any idea what this is?
From: Neville Eyre <neveyre(at)aol.co.uk>
Date: Nov 24, 2011
Hi, As Jim and Heather have said, the rigging cup that captures the tip of the Port spar. Not needed to be there for structural reasons, but makes life a whole lot easier to rig the wings. Would have / should have been Reduxed on during the build, I insist [ when doing Final Inspections] on a 3 ply Bid lay up from the rim, onto the seatb ack bulkhead [ 1'' x 1'' ] to prevent just this from happening. If you haven't got Redux about, scuff the can and seat back area with 80 gr it paper and bond on with [std ] J B Weld, wipe on a good radius fillet, th en do a 3 Bid lay up with whatever epoxy you can get , Zap from you Hobby S tore will do for this. It should ''register'' back on to the Redux pad that is left on the seatback, you can release the tip of the Port spar with pac king tape and wax, and nip up with a greased bolt with the Port wing rigged to be sure of correct position. Check the bond of the other one [ on the aft of the Port spar ]that takes the Stb spar tip. Cheers, Nev -----Original Message----- From: Carl Meek <carlmeek(at)gmail.com> Sent: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:01 Subject: Europa-List: Any idea what this is? My engineer just found this floating around in the belly of the aircraft, h e was quite worried it could get entangled somewhere and jam a control. The question is. What is it? Did it do something important? Thanks, -Carl. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Harrison" <ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: Any idea what this is?
Date: Nov 24, 2011
Hi! Carl It is the receptacle can for the port spar and should be reduxed to the rear of the starboard seat back/tank forward bulk head. It is damaging the ruder cable in the present location. And was probably knocked off by misdirected assembly. If it is not in position between both spars it will allow the starboard pin to be end loose, and therefore IMHO it is a critical part. I recently advised putting leading ramps on to this item to safly guide the port spar into the can rather than thumping it off. It also occurres to me to say that one of your fuel pipes isn't pushed right home under the clip? Regards Bob Harrison. From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Carl Meek Sent: 24 November 2011 12:56 Subject: Europa-List: Any idea what this is? My engineer just found this floating around in the belly of the aircraft, he was quite worried it could get entangled somewhere and jam a control. The question is.. What is it? Did it do something important? Thanks, -Carl. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Carl Meek <carlmeek(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Any idea what this is?
Date: Nov 24, 2011
Do you mean the main starboard pin that goes behind the seat cushion? My pin has a double lock on it to totally prevent it coming loose, presumably this is ok without the part? I recently derigged and rigged with no real issues, despite part not being in place. Regards Carl Sent from my iPhone On 24 Nov 2011, at 20:14, "Bob Harrison" wrote: > Hi! Carl > It is the receptacle can for the port spar and should be reduxed to the re ar of the starboard seat back/tank forward bulk head. > It is damaging the ruder cable in the present location. And was probably k nocked off by misdirected assembly. > If it is not in position between both spars it will allow the starboard pi n to be end loose, and therefore IMHO it is a critical part. > I recently advised putting leading ramps on to this item to safly guide th e port spar into the can rather than thumping it off. > It also occurres to me to say that one of your fuel pipes isn=99t pu shed right home under the clip? > Regards > Bob Harrison. > > From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-ser ver(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Carl Meek > Sent: 24 November 2011 12:56 > To: europa-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Europa-List: Any idea what this is? > > My engineer just found this floating around in the belly of the aircraft, h e was quite worried it could get entangled somewhere and jam a control. > > The question is. What is it? Did it do something important? > > Thanks, > -Carl. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Harrison" <ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: Any idea what this is?
Date: Nov 24, 2011
H! Carl Yes that is the pin but mine is an Avdel Pin with the expanding balls to retain it in place. So I guess you are OK but it for sure would be very difficult rigging on your own , for my money I would do as Neville has recommended soonest. Regards Bob Harrison. G-PTAG From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Carl Meek Sent: 24 November 2011 20:49 Subject: Re: Europa-List: Any idea what this is? Do you mean the main starboard pin that goes behind the seat cushion? My pin has a double lock on it to totally prevent it coming loose, presumably this is ok without the part? I recently derigged and rigged with no real issues, despite part not being in place. Regards Carl Sent from my iPhone On 24 Nov 2011, at 20:14, "Bob Harrison" wrote: Hi! Carl It is the receptacle can for the port spar and should be reduxed to the rear of the starboard seat back/tank forward bulk head. It is damaging the ruder cable in the present location. And was probably knocked off by misdirected assembly. If it is not in position between both spars it will allow the starboard pin to be end loose, and therefore IMHO it is a critical part. I recently advised putting leading ramps on to this item to safly guide the port spar into the can rather than thumping it off. It also occurres to me to say that one of your fuel pipes isn=99t pushed right home under the clip? Regards Bob Harrison. From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Carl Meek Sent: 24 November 2011 12:56 Subject: Europa-List: Any idea what this is? My engineer just found this floating around in the belly of the aircraft, he was quite worried it could get entangled somewhere and jam a control. The question is. What is it? Did it do something important? Thanks, -Carl. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Carl Pattinson" <carl(at)flyers.freeserve.co.uk>
Subject: Any idea what this is?
Date: Nov 25, 2011
Hi, I see this subject has already been well covered. It has been identified as the socket for the starboard (right) wing spar (located behind the port (left) side seat). However it could also be the other locating socket which is bonded to the starboard wing spar itself ! - you don't say if you have identified which side the offending article originates from. Neville refers to this (other socket) in his email. The socket needs to be reduxed back (whichever side it is) and held in place with a couple of layers of bid (as per his instructions). The bid can be applied using either the proper resin (Ampreg) or 30 minute Z-poxy will work just as well - may need to warm it to wet the cloth out as it's a bit gloopy. Cheers Carl (as in Carl Pattinson - G-LABS) From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Carl Meek Sent: 24 November 2011 12:56 Subject: Europa-List: Any idea what this is? My engineer just found this floating around in the belly of the aircraft, he was quite worried it could get entangled somewhere and jam a control. The question is.. What is it? Did it do something important? Thanks, -Carl. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 25, 2011
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Just A Few More Days To Make Your List Contribution...
There is less than a week left in this year's List Fund Raiser and only a few short days to grab one of the great Contribution Gifts available this year. Support is still significantly lagging behind last year at this point but hopefully it will pick up here towards the end. Please remember that it is solely the Contributions of List members that keeps the Lists up and running as there is no commercialism or advertising on the Matronics Lists and Forums. The List Contribution web site is secure, fast, and easy and you can use a credit card, Paypal: http://www.matronics.com/contribution Or, drop a personal check in the mail to: Matt Dralle / Matronics 581 Jeannie Way Livermore CA 94550 I want to thank everyone that has already made a generous contribution to support the Lists! Thank you! Matt Dralle Matronics EMail List and Forum Administrator ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steven Pitt" <steven.pitt2(at)ntlworld.com>
Subject: NEC Flying Show
Date: Nov 25, 2011
For those going to the Flying Show this weekend at the NEC, Birmingham, the Club will be present as a guest/supporter of the LAA stand. Come and meet with us and see David Joyce's prize winning Europa monowheel on display. If you want to meet up with other Europa owners then why not stop by at 11.00am (the traditional meeting time for those attending Sun'n'Fun). Regards Steve Pitt Chairman Europa Club G-SMDH Trigear XS ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Any idea what this is?
From: "h&jeuropa" <butcher43(at)att.net>
Date: Nov 25, 2011
The reason we think it is the starboard cup is that the port cup has a hardened washer bonded to it (or it should have!). The glider wing mod requires removal of the starboard cup due to the increased size of the spar, so if you're not having trouble rigging and anticipate also doing glider wings, that's a reason to leave it off. Jim & Heather N241BW Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=359231#359231 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: NEC Flying Show
From: Groups <Groups(at)thegoddards.com>
Date: Nov 25, 2011
Also visit the Galaxy UL Engines stand to see my Europa classic tailwheel fi tted with a UL Power UL260iS 107Bhp fuel injected air cooled engine. Only ha d the engine 1 day so is work in progress. Vince Goddard Sent from my phone On 25 Nov 2011, at 09:09, "Steven Pitt" wrote: > For those going to the Flying Show this weekend at the NEC, Birmingham, th e Club will be present as a guest/supporter of the LAA stand. Come and meet w ith us and see David Joyce's prize winning Europa monowheel on display. > > If you want to meet up with other Europa owners then why not stop by at 11 .00am (the traditional meeting time for those attending Sun'n'Fun). > > Regards > Steve Pitt > Chairman Europa Club > G-SMDH Trigear XS > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Christoph Both <christoph.both(at)acadiau.ca>
Subject: Diameter of 912 oil hose and oil hose type
Date: Nov 25, 2011
SGVsbG8gRXVyb3BhIGJ1aWxkZXJzOg0KVGhlIDkxMiBpbnN0YWxsYXRpb24gbWFudWFsIHNwZWNp ZmllcyBhIDEyLW1pbGxpbWV0ZXIgb2lsIGhvc2UgY29ubmVjdGluZyB0aGUgUm90YXggdG8gdGhl IG9pbCBjb29sZXIvcm90YXggZXh0ZXJuYWwgb2lsIHBhbi4gMTJtbSBob3NlIGlzIGhhcmQgdG8g Z2V0IGluIE5vcnRoIEFtZXJpY2EvQ2FuYWRhLiDCvSBpbmNoIGhvc2UgaXMganVzdCBhIGJpdCB3 aWRlciBJRCwgc28gbXkgcXVlc3Rpb24gaXMsIHRha2luZyBpbnRvIGFjY291bnQgdGhlIGNvbnNp ZGVyYWJsZSBvaWwgcHJlc3N1cmUgb24gc3RhcnQgdXAgZXhjZWVkaW5nIDEwMHBzaSwgaWYgwr0g aW5jaCBob3NlIGlzIGZpbmUg4oCTIG9mIGNvdXJzZSwgcHJvcGVybHkgc2VjdXJlZCB3aXRoIGNs YW1wcy4gSSBoYXZlIGEgQ0xBU1NJQyBlbmdpbmUgaW5zdGFsbGF0aW9uIGFuZCBhbSBjb25jZXJu ZWQgdGhhdCBvaWwgaG9zZSBkaXJlY3RseSBsb2NhdGVkIGFib3ZlIHRoZSBtdWZmbGVyIHdoaWNo LCBpZiBvaWwgc3RhcnRzIGRyaXBwaW5nIGlzIGFuIGlzc3VlIHdpdGggcG90ZW50aWFsbHkgc3Rh cnRpbmcgYSBmaXJlLg0KUXVlc3Rpb24gIzIgdGhlbiBpczogd2hpY2ggaG9zZSB0eXBlIGV4YWN0 bHk/IFdpdGggdGhlIG9pbCBzdW1wIGV4aXQgbG9jYXRlZCBkaXJlY3RseSBhYm92ZSB0aGUgSE9U IG11ZmZsZXIsIGF0IGEgY2xvc2UgZGlzdGFuY2Ugb2YgbGVzcyB0aGFuIDEgaW5jaCBteSBwcmVm ZXJyZWQgc2VsZWN0aW9uIG9mIGhvc2Ugd291bGQgYmUgc3RhaW5sZXNzIHN0ZWVsIGJyYWlkZWQg aGlnaCBwcmVzc3VyZS9oaWdoIHRlbXBlcmF0dXJlIHByb2R1Y3QuIFdlaWdodCBhbmQgbm90IHRv byBsYXJnZSBPRCBpcyBhbiBpc3N1ZSBhcyB3ZWxsICg1IGZlZXQgd2lsbCBiZSB1c2VkIGZvciB0 aGUgZW50aXJlIGNpcmN1aXQpLiBJIGhhdmUgaWRlbnRpZmllZCBBZXJvcXVpcCA2MDEtOCB3aXRo IFNTIG91dGVyIGFzIHRoZSBtb3N0IGxpa2VseSBwcm9kdWN0ICgkMjAvZm9vdCBmcm9tIEFpcmNy YWZ0IFNwcnVjZSkgYnV0IGJlZm9yZSBJIHBsYWNlIGFuIG9yZGVyIEkgbGlrZSB0byBoZWFyIHlv dXIgb3Bpbmlvbi4NClRoYW5rcywNCkNocmlzdG9waCBCb3RoDQojMjIzIFdvbGZ2aWxsZSwgTm92 YSBTY290aWEsIENhbmFkYQ0KRVVST1BBIENsYXNzaWMgUm90YXggOTEyUyBXb29kY29tcCBTUiAz MDAwLCAyLWJsYWRlLCBpbiBwZXJwZXR1YWwgc3RhdGUgb2YgY29tcGxldGlvbuKApi4NCg= ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 25, 2011
From: Frans Veldman <frans(at)privatepilots.nl>
Subject: Re: Diameter of 912 oil hose and oil hose type
On 11/25/2011 04:53 PM, Christoph Both wrote: > Question #2 then is: which hose type exactly? With the oil sump exit Take a look at: https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/group.asp?GroupID=PLUMANFLEX I used these hoses in my Europa and they served me well. Very light weight, flexible and durable. Make sure to get the associated hose ends, these hoses are not suitable for standard hose clamps. Frans ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Diameter of 912 oil hose and oil hose type
From: Neville Eyre <neveyre(at)aol.co.uk>
Date: Nov 25, 2011
Hi Christoph, The oil lines in the circuit do not see the pressure you see on the gauge,t hat stays within the engine, the line from the tank via the cooler to the p ump inlet sees SUCTION, the return line from the crankcase sees just above atmospheric [ crankcase pressure] so you don't need fancy high pressure hos es, but it does need to be oil resistant, and firm enough to not collapse u nder suction. Try Jap or German Auto parts outlets, they will have hose in that horrible foriegn measurement size ! Go for a ''name'' Brand, ie Goodye ar, Pirelli, Conti and you won't be far wrong. I sleeve ALL fuel and oil lines in either / both Firesleeve [ the red rubbe ry glass lined stuff], or the silver foil covered glass sleeve, ACS or ''Bo y Racer'' Auto stores for those. Rather than the ''Jubilee'' worm drive clamps which have a stiff straight p art on them that won't conform to the hose, I go for the ones with a ''swiv el'' nut and bolt that keeps a constant curve to the clamp circumference, t hey also have a flared rim that prevents them digging in to the hose, more expensive than Jubilee's, cheaper than the fancy [ and unnecessary] Aeroqui p sort. Cheers , Nev -----Original Message----- From: Christoph Both <christoph.both(at)acadiau.ca> Sent: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 17:48 Subject: RE: Europa-List: Diameter of 912 oil hose and oil hose type Hello Europa builders: The 912 installation manual specifies a 12-millimeter oil hose connecting t he Rotax to the oil cooler/rotax external oil pan. 12mm hose is hard to get in North America/Canada. =C2=BD inch hose is just a bit wider ID, so my qu estion is, taking into account the considerable oil pressure on start up ex ceeding 100psi, if =C2=BD inch hose is fine =93 of course, properly s ecured with clamps. I have a CLASSIC engine installation and am concerned t hat oil hose directly located above the muffler which, if oil starts drippi ng is an issue with potentially starting a fire. Question #2 then is: which hose type exactly? With the oil sump exit locate d directly above the HOT muffler, at a close distance of less than 1 inch m y preferred selection of hose would be stainless steel braided high pressur e/high temperature product. Weight and not too large OD is an issue as well (5 feet will be used for the entire circuit). I have identified Aeroquip 6 01-8 with SS outer as the most likely product ($20/foot from Aircraft Spruc e) but before I place an order I like to hear your opinion. Thanks, Christoph Both #223 Wolfville, Nova Scotia, Canada EUROPA Classic Rotax 912S Woodcomp SR 3000, 2-blade, in perpetual state of completion. =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD~=EF=BD=EF=BD,=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD% =EF=BD=EF=BDM4=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDx=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BDw=EF=BDr=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Christoph Both <christoph.both(at)acadiau.ca>
Subject: Diameter of 912 oil hose and oil hose type
Date: Nov 25, 2011
SGkgTmV2LA0KVGhhbmsgeW91IHZlcnkgbXVjaCBmb3IgeW91ciB0aW1lLiBJIHdpbGwgaGVlZCB5 b3VyIGFkdmljZSAoYXMgaW4gdGhlIHBhc3QhKS4NClRoYW5rcywNCkNocmlzdG9waA0KDQoNCkZy b206IG93bmVyLWV1cm9wYS1saXN0LXNlcnZlckBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tIFttYWlsdG86b3duZXIt ZXVyb3BhLWxpc3Qtc2VydmVyQG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb21dIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiBOZXZpbGxlIEV5 cmUNClNlbnQ6IEZyaWRheSwgTm92ZW1iZXIgMjUsIDIwMTEgMjo1NiBQTQ0KVG86IGV1cm9wYS1s aXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20NClN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBFdXJvcGEtTGlzdDogRGlhbWV0ZXIgb2Yg OTEyIG9pbCBob3NlIGFuZCBvaWwgaG9zZSB0eXBlDQoNCkhpIENocmlzdG9waCwNClRoZSBvaWwg bGluZXMgaW4gdGhlIGNpcmN1aXQgZG8gbm90IHNlZSB0aGUgcHJlc3N1cmUgeW91IHNlZSBvbiB0 aGUgZ2F1Z2UsdGhhdCBzdGF5cyB3aXRoaW4gdGhlIGVuZ2luZSwgdGhlIGxpbmUgZnJvbSB0aGUg dGFuayB2aWEgdGhlIGNvb2xlciB0byB0aGUgcHVtcCBpbmxldCBzZWVzIFNVQ1RJT04sIHRoZSBy ZXR1cm4gbGluZSBmcm9tIHRoZSBjcmFua2Nhc2Ugc2VlcyBqdXN0IGFib3ZlIGF0bW9zcGhlcmlj IFsgY3JhbmtjYXNlIHByZXNzdXJlXSBzbyB5b3UgZG9uJ3QgbmVlZCBmYW5jeSBoaWdoIHByZXNz dXJlIGhvc2VzLCBidXQgaXQgZG9lcyBuZWVkIHRvIGJlIG9pbCByZXNpc3RhbnQsIGFuZCBmaXJt IGVub3VnaCB0byBub3QgY29sbGFwc2UgdW5kZXIgc3VjdGlvbi4gVHJ5IEphcCBvciBHZXJtYW4g QXV0byBwYXJ0cyBvdXRsZXRzLCB0aGV5IHdpbGwgaGF2ZSBob3NlIGluIHRoYXQgaG9ycmlibGUg Zm9yaWVnbiBtZWFzdXJlbWVudCBzaXplICEgR28gZm9yIGEgJyduYW1lJycgQnJhbmQsIGllIEdv b2R5ZWFyLCBQaXJlbGxpLCBDb250aSBhbmQgeW91IHdvbid0IGJlIGZhciB3cm9uZy4NCkkgc2xl ZXZlIEFMTCBmdWVsIGFuZCBvaWwgbGluZXMgaW4gZWl0aGVyIC8gYm90aCBGaXJlc2xlZXZlIFsg dGhlIHJlZCBydWJiZXJ5IGdsYXNzIGxpbmVkIHN0dWZmXSwgb3IgdGhlIHNpbHZlciBmb2lsIGNv dmVyZWQgZ2xhc3Mgc2xlZXZlLCBBQ1Mgb3IgJydCb3kgUmFjZXInJyBBdXRvIHN0b3JlcyBmb3Ig dGhvc2UuDQpSYXRoZXIgdGhhbiB0aGUgJydKdWJpbGVlJycgd29ybSBkcml2ZSBjbGFtcHMgd2hp Y2ggaGF2ZSBhIHN0aWZmIHN0cmFpZ2h0IHBhcnQgb24gdGhlbSB0aGF0IHdvbid0IGNvbmZvcm0g dG8gdGhlIGhvc2UsIEkgZ28gZm9yIHRoZSBvbmVzIHdpdGggYSAnJ3N3aXZlbCcnIG51dCBhbmQg Ym9sdCB0aGF0IGtlZXBzIGEgY29uc3RhbnQgY3VydmUgdG8gdGhlIGNsYW1wIGNpcmN1bWZlcmVu Y2UsIHRoZXkgYWxzbyBoYXZlIGEgZmxhcmVkIHJpbSB0aGF0IHByZXZlbnRzIHRoZW0gZGlnZ2lu ZyBpbiB0byB0aGUgaG9zZSwgbW9yZSBleHBlbnNpdmUgdGhhbiBKdWJpbGVlJ3MsIGNoZWFwZXIg dGhhbiB0aGUgZmFuY3kgWyBhbmQgdW5uZWNlc3NhcnldIEFlcm9xdWlwIHNvcnQuDQpDaGVlcnMg LA0KTmV2DQotLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KRnJvbTogQ2hyaXN0b3BoIEJvdGgg PGNocmlzdG9waC5ib3RoQGFjYWRpYXUuY2E+DQpUbzogJ2V1cm9wYS1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5j b20nIDxldXJvcGEtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tPg0KU2VudDogRnJpLCAyNSBOb3YgMjAxMSAx Nzo0OA0KU3ViamVjdDogUkU6IEV1cm9wYS1MaXN0OiBEaWFtZXRlciBvZiA5MTIgb2lsIGhvc2Ug YW5kIG9pbCBob3NlIHR5cGUNCkhlbGxvIEV1cm9wYSBidWlsZGVyczoNClRoZSA5MTIgaW5zdGFs bGF0aW9uIG1hbnVhbCBzcGVjaWZpZXMgYSAxMi1taWxsaW1ldGVyIG9pbCBob3NlIGNvbm5lY3Rp bmcgdGhlIFJvdGF4IHRvIHRoZSBvaWwgY29vbGVyL3JvdGF4IGV4dGVybmFsIG9pbCBwYW4uIDEy bW0gaG9zZSBpcyBoYXJkIHRvIGdldCBpbiBOb3J0aCBBbWVyaWNhL0NhbmFkYS4gwr0gaW5jaCBo b3NlIGlzIGp1c3QgYSBiaXQgd2lkZXIgSUQsIHNvIG15IHF1ZXN0aW9uIGlzLCB0YWtpbmcgaW50 byBhY2NvdW50IHRoZSBjb25zaWRlcmFibGUgb2lsIHByZXNzdXJlIG9uIHN0YXJ0IHVwIGV4Y2Vl ZGluZyAxMDBwc2ksIGlmIMK9IGluY2ggaG9zZSBpcyBmaW5lIOKAkyBvZiBjb3Vyc2UsIHByb3Bl cmx5IHNlY3VyZWQgd2l0aCBjbGFtcHMuIEkgaGF2ZSBhIENMQVNTSUMgZW5naW5lIGluc3RhbGxh dGlvbiBhbmQgYW0gY29uY2VybmVkIHRoYXQgb2lsIGhvc2UgZGlyZWN0bHkgbG9jYXRlZCBhYm92 ZSB0aGUgbXVmZmxlciB3aGljaCwgaWYgb2lsIHN0YXJ0cyBkcmlwcGluZyBpcyBhbiBpc3N1ZSB3 aXRoIHBvdGVudGlhbGx5IHN0YXJ0aW5nIGEgZmlyZS4NClF1ZXN0aW9uICMyIHRoZW4gaXM6IHdo aWNoIGhvc2UgdHlwZSBleGFjdGx5PyBXaXRoIHRoZSBvaWwgc3VtcCBleGl0IGxvY2F0ZWQgZGly ZWN0bHkgYWJvdmUgdGhlIEhPVCBtdWZmbGVyLCBhdCBhIGNsb3NlIGRpc3RhbmNlIG9mIGxlc3Mg dGhhbiAxIGluY2ggbXkgcHJlZmVycmVkIHNlbGVjdGlvbiBvZiBob3NlIHdvdWxkIGJlIHN0YWlu bGVzcyBzdGVlbCBicmFpZGVkIGhpZ2ggcHJlc3N1cmUvaGlnaCB0ZW1wZXJhdHVyZSBwcm9kdWN0 LiBXZWlnaHQgYW5kIG5vdCB0b28gbGFyZ2UgT0QgaXMgYW4gaXNzdWUgYXMgd2VsbCAoNSBmZWV0 IHdpbGwgYmUgdXNlZCBmb3IgdGhlIGVudGlyZSBjaXJjdWl0KS4gSSBoYXZlIGlkZW50aWZpZWQg QWVyb3F1aXAgNjAxLTggd2l0aCBTUyBvdXRlciBhcyB0aGUgbW9zdCBsaWtlbHkgcHJvZHVjdCAo JDIwL2Zvb3QgZnJvbSBBaXJjcmFmdCBTcHJ1Y2UpIGJ1dCBiZWZvcmUgSSBwbGFjZSBhbiBvcmRl ciBJIGxpa2UgdG8gaGVhciB5b3VyIG9waW5pb24uDQpUaGFua3MsDQpDaHJpc3RvcGggQm90aA0K IzIyMyBXb2xmdmlsbGUsIE5vdmEgU2NvdGlhLCBDYW5hZGENCkVVUk9QQSBDbGFzc2ljIFJvdGF4 IDkxMlMgV29vZGNvbXAgU1IgMzAwMCwgMi1ibGFkZSwgaW4gcGVycGV0dWFsIHN0YXRlIG9mIGNv bXBsZXRpb27igKYuDQrvv73vv73vv71+77+977+9LO+/ve+/ve+/vSXvv73vv71NNO+/ve+/ve+/ vXjvv73vv73vv73vv71377+9cu+/ve+/ve+/ve+/vQ0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCl8tPT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09DQoNCl8tPQ0K DQpfLT0gICAgICAgLS0gUGxlYXNlIFN1cHBvcnQgWW91ciBMaXN0cyBUaGlzIE1vbnRoIC0tDQoN Cl8tPSAgICAgICAgICAgKEFuZCBHZXQgU29tZSBBV0VTT01FIEZSRUUgR2lmdHMhKQ0KDQpfLT0N Cg0KXy09ICAgTm92ZW1iZXIgaXMgdGhlIEFubnVhbCBMaXN0IEZ1bmQgUmFpc2VyLiAgQ2xpY2sg b24NCg0KXy09ICAgdGhlIENvbnRyaWJ1dGlvbiBsaW5rIGJlbG93IHRvIGZpbmQgb3V0IG1vcmUg YWJvdXQNCg0KXy09ICAgdGhpcyB5ZWFyJ3MgVGVycmlmaWMgRnJlZSBJbmNlbnRpdmUgR2lmdHMg cHJvdmlkZWQNCg0KXy09ICAgYnk6DQoNCl8tPQ0KDQpfLT0gICAgICogQWVyb0VsZWN0cmljIHd3 dy5hZXJvZWxlY3RyaWMuY29tPGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuYWVyb2VsZWN0cmljLmNvbT4NCg0KXy09ICAg ICAqIFRoZSBCdWlsZGVyJ3MgQm9va3N0b3JlIHd3dy5idWlsZGVyc2Jvb2tzLmNvbTxodHRwOi8v d3d3LmJ1aWxkZXJzYm9va3MuY29tPg0KDQpfLT0gICAgICogSG9tZWJ1aWx0SEVMUCB3d3cuaG9t ZWJ1aWx0aGVscC5jb208aHR0cDovL3d3dy5ob21lYnVpbHRoZWxwLmNvbT4NCg0KXy09DQoNCl8t PSAgIExpc3QgQ29udHJpYnV0aW9uIFdlYiBTaXRlOg0KDQpfLT0NCg0KXy09ICAgLS0+IGh0dHA6 Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9jb250cmlidXRpb24NCg0KXy09DQoNCl8tPSAgIFRoYW5rIHlv dSBmb3IgeW91ciBnZW5lcm91cyBzdXBwb3J0IQ0KDQpfLT0NCg0KXy09ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgLU1hdHQgRHJhbGxlLCBMaXN0IEFkbWluLg0KDQpfLT0NCg0KXy09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0N Cg0KXy09ICAgICAgICAgIC0gVGhlIEV1cm9wYS1MaXN0IEVtYWlsIEZvcnVtIC0NCg0KXy09IFVz ZSB0aGUgTWF0cm9uaWNzIExpc3QgRmVhdHVyZXMgTmF2aWdhdG9yIHRvIGJyb3dzZQ0KDQpfLT0g dGhlIG1hbnkgTGlzdCB1dGlsaXRpZXMgc3VjaCBhcyBMaXN0IFVuL1N1YnNjcmlwdGlvbiwNCg0K Xy09IEFyY2hpdmUgU2VhcmNoICYgRG93bmxvYWQsIDctRGF5IEJyb3dzZSwgQ2hhdCwgRkFRLA0K DQpfLT0gUGhvdG9zaGFyZSwgYW5kIG11Y2ggbXVjaCBtb3JlOg0KDQpfLT0NCg0KXy09ICAgLS0+ IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9OYXZpZ2F0b3I/RXVyb3BhLUxpc3QNCg0KXy09DQoN Cl8tPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09DQoNCl8tPSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIC0gTUFUUk9OSUNTIFdFQiBGT1JVTVMgLQ0KDQpf LT0gU2FtZSBncmVhdCBjb250ZW50IGFsc28gYXZhaWxhYmxlIHZpYSB0aGUgV2ViIEZvcnVtcyEN Cg0KXy09DQoNCl8tPSAgIC0tPiBodHRwOi8vZm9ydW1zLm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20NCg0KXy09DQoN Cl8tPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09DQoNCl8tPSAgICAgICAgICAgICAtIExpc3QgQ29udHJpYnV0aW9uIFdlYiBTaXRlIC0N Cg0KXy09ICBUaGFuayB5b3UgZm9yIHlvdXIgZ2VuZXJvdXMgc3VwcG9ydCENCg0KXy09ICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgLU1hdHQgRHJhbGxlLCBMaXN0IEFkbWluLg0KDQpfLT0g ICAtLT4gaHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL2NvbnRyaWJ1dGlvbg0KDQpfLT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ0KDQoN Cg= ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 26, 2011
Subject: Leaky Brake Fitting - Some advice please!
From: Carl Meek <carlmeek(at)gmail.com>
I had a problem today where the parking brake got stuck on. Normally to release it, I put a lot of pressure on the finger brakes and it unsticks. Unfortunately, something else unstuck first! I must have put a bit too much pressure on the left brake (same one I had bleeding problems with) and it squirted fluid out. Looks like I need a new nylon compression olive, or perhaps a whole new brass fitting. Any idea where to get these from? They are the much hated jamar (I think that's the name) brakes. Leak was from between the nylon olive ring and pipe itself. The next trouble is that I need to get to the parking brake valve to put a new handle on it (I snapped it off during my messing about) but I have no idea how to get to it! Its inside the central tunnel, seemingly inaccessible. I might even need to get to this to replace the length of pipe, I suspect it needs refreshing in order to fix this leak. Thanks for any advice :) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "G-IANI" <g-iani(at)ntlworld.com>
Subject: Leaky Brake Fitting - Some advice please!
Date: Nov 26, 2011
Carl What colour are your brake pipes. If they were supplied by Europa and are black they are 6mm tube. If they are supplied by Europa and clear (white) they are =BC inch. Brass poly flow fittings are designed for =BC inch tube. They will (just about) work with the black 6mm tube but can be blown of with pressure or knocked of easily. Europa changed over to the clear (white) =BC tube when this was pointed out to them. So if you are replacing any tube make sure it is =BC inch. As far as I know you cannot buy the olives on there own. You can buy the brass end fitting with the olive and sleeve in it from Aircraft Spruce part No 261-UB-4 . Have a look at the range, search for Brass Poly-flo fittings. Sorry but I have no magic way of getting at your parking brake valve. I assume you can just about access it from the inspection hatch behind the fuel cock on the starboard side of the tunnel. Ian Rickard G-IANI XS Trigear, 300hours Europa Club Mods Specialist e-mail g-iani(at)ntlworld.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 26, 2011
Subject: Re: Leaky Brake Fitting - Some advice please!
From: Carl Meek <carlmeek(at)gmail.com>
See attached pic=8A they are a mix! Looks like black from the reservoir, opaque white onwards. Thanks for the info, I'll check out Aircraft Spruce. There is a small access hatch about 8" behind it on starboard side, but no clear way to access it directly=8A. I guess I'll have to get mirrors and torc h and try and see if I can service it! Thanks, -Carl. From: G-IANI <g-iani(at)ntlworld.com> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 19:01:19 -0000 Subject: RE: Europa-List: Leaky Brake Fitting - Some advice please! Carl What colour are your brake pipes. If they were supplied by Europa and are black they are 6mm tube. If they are supplied by Europa and clear (white) they are 1=8E4 inch. Brass poly flow fittings are designed for 1=8E4 inch tube . They will (just about) work with the black 6mm tube but can be blown of with pressure or knocked of easily. Europa changed over to the clear (white) 1=8E4 tube when this was pointed out to them. So if you are replacin g any tube make sure it is 1=8E4 inch. As far as I know you cannot buy the olives on there own. You can buy the brass end fitting with the olive and sleeve in it from Aircraft Spruce part No 261-UB-4 . Have a look at the range, search for Brass Poly-flo fittings. Sorry but I have no magic way of getting at your parking brake valve. I assume you can just about access it from the inspection hatch behind the fuel cock on the starboard side of the tunnel. Ian Rickard G-IANI XS Trigear, 300hours Europa Club Mods Specialist e-mail g-iani(at)ntlworld.com <http://www.buildersbooks.com> > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 26, 2011
From: Jan de Jong <jan_de_jong(at)casema.nl>
Subject: Re: EURO02 part supplied wrong
Much belated - thank you Rowland! Jan de Jong > Jan - Mike McClean at Europa read my e-mail posting and is getting the right screws sent to me on Monday. Good service! > > in friendship > > Rowland > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 27, 2011
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Please Make A Contribution Today...
Dear Listers, A quick reminder that November is the annual List Fund Raiser and the List of Contributors is quickly approching. The Matronics Lists are 100% member supported and all of the operational costs are provided for by your Contributions during this time of the year. Your personal Contribution makes a big difference and keeps all of the Matronics Email Lists and Forums completely ad-free. Please make your Contribution today to keep these services up and running! http://www.matronics.com/contribution or by dropping a personal check in the mail to: Matt Dralle / Matronics 581 Jeannie Way Livermore CA 94550 Thank you in advance! Matt Dralle Matronics Email List and Forum Administrator ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 27, 2011
From: Frans Veldman <frans(at)privatepilots.nl>
Subject: Re: Leaky Brake Fitting - Some advice please!
Hi Carl, > I had a problem today where the parking brake got stuck on. Normally to > release it, I put a lot of pressure on the finger brakes and it > unsticks. I'm a bit puzzled by this. My parking brake valve, as supplied by Europa together with the Jamar junk, has no "feel" in it. I just move the lever back and forth without any force (there is no detectable friction), and it doesn't matter whether the brakes are enganged or not. So, if the parking brake is set it takes no force at all to release it, just a hint of a fingertip is sufficient. > Unfortunately, something else unstuck first! I must have put a > bit too much pressure on the left brake (same one I had bleeding > problems with) and it squirted fluid out. As seen from the picture it looks like someone mishandled the nut, apparently in a desperate attempt to seal it. If it wasn't you who did it just after the recent leak, it looks like it has caused troubles before. Although I hate the Jamar junk it doesn't look like it has anything to do with it this time. You just need to replace the brass nut and seal. Ian just pointed out that the black tube is of the wrong size. Well, I only have the black one but it never gave problems. In your case I wouldn't worry about the one black tube from the central connection, it is indeed connected to the reservoir and never carries any pressure at all. > The next trouble is that I need to get to the parking brake valve to put > a new handle on it From your description I think that your parking brake is broken and needs to be replaced completely. > but I have > no idea how to get to it! Its inside the central tunnel, seemingly > inaccessible. The belly directly under the tunnel was originally intended to be cut away for the monowheel, it is just a thin skin and carries no structural purpose at all. Many trigear owners (like me) have cut it (partly) away nevertheless and created a hatch in place of it. You can still do that and you will find there is so much working space there that you can even stick your head in it. Replacing the parking brake will be very easy that way. Also it offers easy inspection of fuel lines, rudder cables and other things. If there is no hatch there, I wonder how one would carry out the annual inspection. Succes, Frans ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 27, 2011
From: jimpuglise(at)comcast.net
Subject: First Flight Video N283JL
We were able to upload the video of N283JLs first flight to Youtube. Sue Jeffers took some excellent video and stills and Peter expertly edited it. The video is about 8 minutes long. To view it, go to Youtube and put "N283JL" into your search engine. We are now approaching 10 hours, everything seems to be running fine, and all temps have been in the green for the last two flights. Jim Puglise N283JL, XS Jabiru 3300 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 27, 2011
Subject: Re: First Flight Video N283JL
From: Paul McAllister <paul.the.aviator(at)gmail.com>
Jim, thanks for sharing this. Let the fun begin [?] !!!! On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 10:39 AM, wrote: > We were able to upload the video of N283JLs first flight to Youtube. Sue > Jeffers took some excellent video and stills and Peter expertly edited it. > The video is about 8 minutes long. To view it, go to Youtube and put > "N283JL" into your search engine. We are now approaching 10 hours, > everything seems to be running fine, and all temps have been in the green > for the last two flights. > > Jim Puglise > N283JL, XS Jabiru 3300 > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: First Flight Video N283JL
From: Robert Borger <rlborger(at)mac.com>
Date: Nov 27, 2011
Jim & Lynn, Thanks for the video! Enjoy! Enjoy! Enjoy! Blue skies & tailwinds, Bob Borger Europa XS Tri, Rotax 914, Airmaster C/S Prop. Little Toot Sport Biplane, Lycoming Thunderbolt AEIO-320 EXP 3705 Lynchburg Dr. Corinth, TX 76208-5331 Cel: 817-992-1117 rlborger(at)mac.com On Nov 27, 2011, at 10:39 AM, jimpuglise(at)comcast.net wrote: > We were able to upload the video of N283JLs first flight to Youtube. Sue Jeffers took some excellent video and stills and Peter expertly edited it. The video is about 8 minutes long. To view it, go to Youtube and put "N283JL" into your search engine. We are now approaching 10 hours, everything seems to be running fine, and all temps have been in the green for the last two flights. > > Jim Puglise > N283JL, XS Jabiru 3300 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Fred Klein <fklein(at)orcasonline.com>
Subject: Re: First Flight Video N283JL
Date: Nov 27, 2011
On Nov 27, 2011, at 8:39 AM, jimpuglise(at)comcast.net wrote: > We were able to upload the video of N283JLs first flight to Youtube. Excellent Jim...a very BIG DAY...thanks for the tip on the video, Fred ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tim Ward" <ward.t(at)xtra.co.nz>
Subject: Aluminium Pipe for Fuel Inlet
Date: Nov 28, 2011
Hi Europa Builders, I have had a request for more Aluminium pipes for the fuel Inlet between the =9Ccobra=9D and the fuel tank. Are there any other builders interested in one? See the attachment. Cheers, Tim Mono Classic #292 ZK-TIM Tim Ward, 12 Waiwetu Street, Fendalton, Christchurch 8052 New Zealand Ph; 03 3515166 Mob; 0210640221 email; ward.t(at)xtra.co.nz ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "craig" <craigb(at)onthenet.com.au>
Subject: First Flight Video N283JL
Date: Nov 28, 2011
Wonderful, Jim, you must be very happy, congrats craig From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of jimpuglise(at)comcast.net Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 2:40 AM Subject: Europa-List: First Flight Video N283JL We were able to upload the video of N283JLs first flight to Youtube. Sue Jeffers took some excellent video and stills and Peter expertly edited it. The video is about 8 minutes long. To view it, go to Youtube and put "N283JL" into your search engine. We are now approaching 10 hours, everything seems to be running fine, and all temps have been in the green for the last two flights. Jim Puglise N283JL, XS Jabiru 3300 _____ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jeffrey Roberts <jeff(at)rmmm.net>
Subject: Re: First Flight Video N283JL
Date: Nov 27, 2011
Jim & lynn, A very hardy Congratulations from Tennessee!! Fly safe & have fun!! Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush On Nov 27, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Robert Borger wrote: > Jim & Lynn, > > Thanks for the video! Enjoy! Enjoy! Enjoy! > > Blue skies & tailwinds, > Bob Borger > Europa XS Tri, Rotax 914, Airmaster C/S Prop. > Little Toot Sport Biplane, Lycoming Thunderbolt AEIO-320 EXP > 3705 Lynchburg Dr. > Corinth, TX 76208-5331 > Cel: 817-992-1117 > rlborger(at)mac.com > > On Nov 27, 2011, at 10:39 AM, jimpuglise(at)comcast.net wrote: > >> We were able to upload the video of N283JLs first flight to Youtube. Sue Jeffers took some excellent video and stills and Peter expertly edited it. The video is about 8 minutes long. To view it, go to Youtube and put "N283JL" into your search engine. We are now approaching 10 hours, everything seems to be running fine, and all temps have been in the green for the last two flights. >> >> Jim Puglise >> N283JL, XS Jabiru 3300 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fwd: question from Rough River
From: "Troy Maynor" <wingnut54(at)charter.net>
Date: Nov 27, 2011
Jeff, Any weekend is good for Donna and myself. Just let us know. Probably later is better than Labor Day. Troy Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=359509#359509 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Diameter of 912 oil hose and oil hose type
From: Neville Eyre <neveyre(at)aol.co.uk>
Date: Nov 27, 2011
Hi Guys, Duncan kindly remined me I didn't mention temperature specification in my l ast post, thanks Duncan, I trust builders won't go to B&Q or Walmart for th eir hose, go to a Race Auto shop [Think Automotive or similar outlet], don' t trust the Clerk, refer to the Manufacturers Spec' Sheet to see the hose i s both Oil and Temp suitable.See what racers are using on their Subaru WRX' s and Mitsubushi EVO's and the like ? What I was [ poorly] trying to say is fancy Teflon / Stainless lines are no t needed , and in fact difficult to hook up to the Rotax tank and motor con nections with the Aeroquip / Earls type fittings and too stiff to run in th e limited space easily.. [ and at =C2=A325 / $35 + an end !] Cheers, Nev. -----Original Message----- From: Christoph Both <christoph.both(at)acadiau.ca> Sent: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 19:38 Subject: RE: Europa-List: Diameter of 912 oil hose and oil hose type Hi Nev, Thank you very much for your time. I will heed your advice (as in the past! ). Thanks, Christoph From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-serv er(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Neville Eyre Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 2:56 PM Subject: Re: Europa-List: Diameter of 912 oil hose and oil hose type Hi Christoph, The oil lines in the circuit do not see the pressure you see on the gauge,t hat stays within the engine, the line from the tank via the cooler to the p ump inlet sees SUCTION, the return line from the crankcase sees just above atmospheric [ crankcase pressure] so you don't need fancy high pressure hos es, but it does need to be oil resistant, and firm enough to not collapse u nder suction. Try Jap or German Auto parts outlets, they will have hose in that horrible foriegn measurement size ! Go for a ''name'' Brand, ie Goodye ar, Pirelli, Conti and you won't be far wrong. I sleeve ALL fuel and oil lines in either / both Firesleeve [ the red rubbe ry glass lined stuff], or the silver foil covered glass sleeve, ACS or ''Bo y Racer'' Auto stores for those. Rather than the ''Jubilee'' worm drive clamps which have a stiff straight p art on them that won't conform to the hose, I go for the ones with a ''swiv el'' nut and bolt that keeps a constant curve to the clamp circumference, t hey also have a flared rim that prevents them digging in to the hose, more expensive than Jubilee's, cheaper than the fancy [ and unnecessary] Aeroqui p sort. Cheers , Nev -----Original Message----- From: Christoph Both <christoph.both(at)acadiau.ca> Sent: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 17:48 Subject: RE: Europa-List: Diameter of 912 oil hose and oil hose type Hello Europa builders: The 912 installation manual specifies a 12-millimeter oil hose connecting t he Rotax to the oil cooler/rotax external oil pan. 12mm hose is hard to get in North America/Canada. =C2=BD inch hose is just a bit wider ID, so my qu estion is, taking into account the considerable oil pressure on start up ex ceeding 100psi, if =C2=BD inch hose is fine =93 of course, properly s ecured with clamps. I have a CLASSIC engine installation and am concerned t hat oil hose directly located above the muffler which, if oil starts drippi ng is an issue with potentially starting a fire. Question #2 then is: which hose type exactly? With the oil sump exit locate d directly above the HOT muffler, at a close distance of less than 1 inch m y preferred selection of hose would be stainless steel braided high pressur e/high temperature product. Weight and not too large OD is an issue as well (5 feet will be used for the entire circuit). I have identified Aeroquip 6 01-8 with SS outer as the most likely product ($20/foot from Aircraft Spruc e) but before I place an order I like to hear your opinion. Thanks, Christoph Both #223 Wolfville, Nova Scotia, Canada EUROPA Classic Rotax 912S Woodcomp SR 3000, 2-blade, in perpetual state of completion. =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD~=EF=BD=EF=BD,=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD% =EF=BD=EF=BDM4=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDx=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BDw=EF=BDr=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD~=EF=BD=EF=BD,=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD% =EF=BD=EF=BDM4=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDx=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BDw=EF=BDr=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Christoph Both <christoph.both(at)acadiau.ca>
Subject: Diameter of 912 oil hose and oil hose type
Date: Nov 28, 2011
TmV2LA0KVGhhbmtzIGFnYWluIGZvciBjbGFyaWZpY2F0aW9uLiBJbiBhZGRpdGlvbiB0byB0aGUg cnViYmVyIGhvc2UgeW91IHJlY29tbWVuZCBGaXJlU2xlZXZlIGFzIHdlbGwsIHJpZ2h0Pw0KSWYg c3VjaCBhIGdvb2QgaG9zZSBjb3VsZCBiZSBmb3VuZCDigJMgd291bGQgwr0gaW5jaCBiZSBPSz8g SSBhbSBoYXZpbmcgZ3JlYXQgZGlmZmljdWx0eSBzb3VyY2luZyAxMm1tIG9pbC9oaWdoIHRlbXAg aG9zZSBpbiB0aGUgbG9jYWwgYXV0byBwYXJ0IHN0b3JlcyBpbiBDYW5hZGEuIMK9IGluY2ggaXMg YSBiaXQgd2lkZXIgYW5kIEkgZG9u4oCZdCBsaWtlIHNlZXBpbmcgb2lsIGxpbmVzLCBlc3BlY2lh bGx5IGluIHRoZSBDTEFTU0lDIGluc3RhbGxhdGlvbiB3aGVyZSBldmVyeXRoaW5nIGluIHJlYWNo IGRyaXBzIG9uIHRoZSBob3QgZXhoYXVzdC4gRmlyZXNsZWV2ZSBpcyBubyBwcm9ibGVtLCBJIGNh biBnZXQgaXQgZnJvbSBBaXJjcmFmdCBTcHJ1Y2UuDQpZb3VyIHRob3VnaHRzPw0KQ2hyaXN0b3Bo DQoNCg0KRnJvbTogb3duZXItZXVyb3BhLWxpc3Qtc2VydmVyQG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20gW21haWx0 bzpvd25lci1ldXJvcGEtbGlzdC1zZXJ2ZXJAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbV0gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mIE5l dmlsbGUgRXlyZQ0KU2VudDogU3VuZGF5LCBOb3ZlbWJlciAyNywgMjAxMSAxMDoxNSBQTQ0KVG86 IGV1cm9wYS1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20NClN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBFdXJvcGEtTGlzdDogRGlh bWV0ZXIgb2YgOTEyIG9pbCBob3NlIGFuZCBvaWwgaG9zZSB0eXBlDQoNCkhpIEd1eXMsDQpEdW5j YW4ga2luZGx5IHJlbWluZWQgbWUgSSBkaWRuJ3QgbWVudGlvbiB0ZW1wZXJhdHVyZSBzcGVjaWZp Y2F0aW9uIGluIG15IGxhc3QgcG9zdCwgdGhhbmtzIER1bmNhbiwgSSB0cnVzdCBidWlsZGVycyB3 b24ndCBnbyB0byBCJlEgb3IgV2FsbWFydCBmb3IgdGhlaXIgaG9zZSwgZ28gdG8gYSBSYWNlIEF1 dG8gc2hvcCBbVGhpbmsgQXV0b21vdGl2ZSBvciBzaW1pbGFyIG91dGxldF0sIGRvbid0IHRydXN0 IHRoZSBDbGVyaywgcmVmZXIgdG8gdGhlIE1hbnVmYWN0dXJlcnMgU3BlYycgU2hlZXQgdG8gc2Vl IHRoZSBob3NlIGlzIGJvdGggT2lsIGFuZCBUZW1wIHN1aXRhYmxlLlNlZSB3aGF0IHJhY2VycyBh cmUgdXNpbmcgb24gdGhlaXIgU3ViYXJ1IFdSWCdzIGFuZCBNaXRzdWJ1c2hpIEVWTydzIGFuZCB0 aGUgbGlrZSA/DQpXaGF0IEkgd2FzIFsgcG9vcmx5XSB0cnlpbmcgdG8gc2F5IGlzIGZhbmN5IFRl ZmxvbiAvIFN0YWlubGVzcyBsaW5lcyBhcmUgbm90IG5lZWRlZCAsIGFuZCBpbiBmYWN0IGRpZmZp Y3VsdCB0byBob29rIHVwIHRvIHRoZSBSb3RheCB0YW5rIGFuZCBtb3RvciBjb25uZWN0aW9ucyB3 aXRoIHRoZSBBZXJvcXVpcCAvIEVhcmxzIHR5cGUgZml0dGluZ3MgYW5kIHRvbyBzdGlmZiB0byBy dW4gaW4gdGhlIGxpbWl0ZWQgc3BhY2UgZWFzaWx5Li4gWyBhbmQgYXQgwqMyNSAvICQzNSArIGFu IGVuZCAhXQ0KQ2hlZXJzLA0KTmV2Lg0KDQotLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KRnJv bTogQ2hyaXN0b3BoIEJvdGggPGNocmlzdG9waC5ib3RoQGFjYWRpYXUuY2E+DQpUbzogJ2V1cm9w YS1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20nIDxldXJvcGEtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tPg0KU2VudDog RnJpLCAyNSBOb3YgMjAxMSAxOTozOA0KU3ViamVjdDogUkU6IEV1cm9wYS1MaXN0OiBEaWFtZXRl ciBvZiA5MTIgb2lsIGhvc2UgYW5kIG9pbCBob3NlIHR5cGUNCkhpIE5ldiwNClRoYW5rIHlvdSB2 ZXJ5IG11Y2ggZm9yIHlvdXIgdGltZS4gSSB3aWxsIGhlZWQgeW91ciBhZHZpY2UgKGFzIGluIHRo ZSBwYXN0ISkuDQpUaGFua3MsDQpDaHJpc3RvcGgNCg0KDQpGcm9tOiBvd25lci1ldXJvcGEtbGlz dC1zZXJ2ZXJAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbTxtYWlsdG86b3duZXItZXVyb3BhLWxpc3Qtc2VydmVyQG1h dHJvbmljcy5jb20+IFttYWlsdG86b3duZXItZXVyb3BhLWxpc3Qtc2VydmVyQG1hdHJvbmljcy5j b208bWFpbHRvOm93bmVyLWV1cm9wYS1saXN0LXNlcnZlckBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tPz5dIE9uIEJl aGFsZiBPZiBOZXZpbGxlIEV5cmUNClNlbnQ6IEZyaWRheSwgTm92ZW1iZXIgMjUsIDIwMTEgMjo1 NiBQTQ0KVG86IGV1cm9wYS1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb208bWFpbHRvOmV1cm9wYS1saXN0QG1h dHJvbmljcy5jb20+DQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogRXVyb3BhLUxpc3Q6IERpYW1ldGVyIG9mIDkxMiBv aWwgaG9zZSBhbmQgb2lsIGhvc2UgdHlwZQ0KDQpIaSBDaHJpc3RvcGgsDQpUaGUgb2lsIGxpbmVz IGluIHRoZSBjaXJjdWl0IGRvIG5vdCBzZWUgdGhlIHByZXNzdXJlIHlvdSBzZWUgb24gdGhlIGdh dWdlLHRoYXQgc3RheXMgd2l0aGluIHRoZSBlbmdpbmUsIHRoZSBsaW5lIGZyb20gdGhlIHRhbmsg dmlhIHRoZSBjb29sZXIgdG8gdGhlIHB1bXAgaW5sZXQgc2VlcyBTVUNUSU9OLCB0aGUgcmV0dXJu IGxpbmUgZnJvbSB0aGUgY3JhbmtjYXNlIHNlZXMganVzdCBhYm92ZSBhdG1vc3BoZXJpYyBbIGNy YW5rY2FzZSBwcmVzc3VyZV0gc28geW91IGRvbid0IG5lZWQgZmFuY3kgaGlnaCBwcmVzc3VyZSBo b3NlcywgYnV0IGl0IGRvZXMgbmVlZCB0byBiZSBvaWwgcmVzaXN0YW50LCBhbmQgZmlybSBlbm91 Z2ggdG8gbm90IGNvbGxhcHNlIHVuZGVyIHN1Y3Rpb24uIFRyeSBKYXAgb3IgR2VybWFuIEF1dG8g cGFydHMgb3V0bGV0cywgdGhleSB3aWxsIGhhdmUgaG9zZSBpbiB0aGF0IGhvcnJpYmxlIGZvcmll Z24gbWVhc3VyZW1lbnQgc2l6ZSAhIEdvIGZvciBhICcnbmFtZScnIEJyYW5kLCBpZSBHb29keWVh ciwgUGlyZWxsaSwgQ29udGkgYW5kIHlvdSB3b24ndCBiZSBmYXIgd3JvbmcuDQpJIHNsZWV2ZSBB TEwgZnVlbCBhbmQgb2lsIGxpbmVzIGluIGVpdGhlciAvIGJvdGggRmlyZXNsZWV2ZSBbIHRoZSBy ZWQgcnViYmVyeSBnbGFzcyBsaW5lZCBzdHVmZl0sIG9yIHRoZSBzaWx2ZXIgZm9pbCBjb3ZlcmVk IGdsYXNzIHNsZWV2ZSwgQUNTIG9yICcnQm95IFJhY2VyJycgQXV0byBzdG9yZXMgZm9yIHRob3Nl Lg0KUmF0aGVyIHRoYW4gdGhlICcnSnViaWxlZScnIHdvcm0gZHJpdmUgY2xhbXBzIHdoaWNoIGhh dmUgYSBzdGlmZiBzdHJhaWdodCBwYXJ0IG9uIHRoZW0gdGhhdCB3b24ndCBjb25mb3JtIHRvIHRo ZSBob3NlLCBJIGdvIGZvciB0aGUgb25lcyB3aXRoIGEgJydzd2l2ZWwnJyBudXQgYW5kIGJvbHQg dGhhdCBrZWVwcyBhIGNvbnN0YW50IGN1cnZlIHRvIHRoZSBjbGFtcCBjaXJjdW1mZXJlbmNlLCB0 aGV5IGFsc28gaGF2ZSBhIGZsYXJlZCByaW0gdGhhdCBwcmV2ZW50cyB0aGVtIGRpZ2dpbmcgaW4g dG8gdGhlIGhvc2UsIG1vcmUgZXhwZW5zaXZlIHRoYW4gSnViaWxlZSdzLCBjaGVhcGVyIHRoYW4g dGhlIGZhbmN5IFsgYW5kIHVubmVjZXNzYXJ5XSBBZXJvcXVpcCBzb3J0Lg0KQ2hlZXJzICwNCk5l dg0KLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IENocmlzdG9waCBCb3RoIDxjaHJp c3RvcGguYm90aEBhY2FkaWF1LmNhPG1haWx0bzpjaHJpc3RvcGguYm90aEBhY2FkaWF1LmNhPj4N ClRvOiAnZXVyb3BhLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbTxtYWlsdG86ZXVyb3BhLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9u aWNzLmNvbT4nIDxldXJvcGEtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tPG1haWx0bzpldXJvcGEtbGlzdEBt YXRyb25pY3MuY29tPj4NClNlbnQ6IEZyaSwgMjUgTm92IDIwMTEgMTc6NDgNClN1YmplY3Q6IFJF OiBFdXJvcGEtTGlzdDogRGlhbWV0ZXIgb2YgOTEyIG9pbCBob3NlIGFuZCBvaWwgaG9zZSB0eXBl DQpIZWxsbyBFdXJvcGEgYnVpbGRlcnM6DQpUaGUgOTEyIGluc3RhbGxhdGlvbiBtYW51YWwgc3Bl Y2lmaWVzIGEgMTItbWlsbGltZXRlciBvaWwgaG9zZSBjb25uZWN0aW5nIHRoZSBSb3RheCB0byB0 aGUgb2lsIGNvb2xlci9yb3RheCBleHRlcm5hbCBvaWwgcGFuLiAxMm1tIGhvc2UgaXMgaGFyZCB0 byBnZXQgaW4gTm9ydGggQW1lcmljYS9DYW5hZGEuIMK9IGluY2ggaG9zZSBpcyBqdXN0IGEgYml0 IHdpZGVyIElELCBzbyBteSBxdWVzdGlvbiBpcywgdGFraW5nIGludG8gYWNjb3VudCB0aGUgY29u c2lkZXJhYmxlIG9pbCBwcmVzc3VyZSBvbiBzdGFydCB1cCBleGNlZWRpbmcgMTAwcHNpLCBpZiDC vSBpbmNoIGhvc2UgaXMgZmluZSDigJMgb2YgY291cnNlLCBwcm9wZXJseSBzZWN1cmVkIHdpdGgg Y2xhbXBzLiBJIGhhdmUgYSBDTEFTU0lDIGVuZ2luZSBpbnN0YWxsYXRpb24gYW5kIGFtIGNvbmNl cm5lZCB0aGF0IG9pbCBob3NlIGRpcmVjdGx5IGxvY2F0ZWQgYWJvdmUgdGhlIG11ZmZsZXIgd2hp Y2gsIGlmIG9pbCBzdGFydHMgZHJpcHBpbmcgaXMgYW4gaXNzdWUgd2l0aCBwb3RlbnRpYWxseSBz dGFydGluZyBhIGZpcmUuDQpRdWVzdGlvbiAjMiB0aGVuIGlzOiB3aGljaCBob3NlIHR5cGUgZXhh Y3RseT8gV2l0aCB0aGUgb2lsIHN1bXAgZXhpdCBsb2NhdGVkIGRpcmVjdGx5IGFib3ZlIHRoZSBI T1QgbXVmZmxlciwgYXQgYSBjbG9zZSBkaXN0YW5jZSBvZiBsZXNzIHRoYW4gMSBpbmNoIG15IHBy ZWZlcnJlZCBzZWxlY3Rpb24gb2YgaG9zZSB3b3VsZCBiZSBzdGFpbmxlc3Mgc3RlZWwgYnJhaWRl ZCBoaWdoIHByZXNzdXJlL2hpZ2ggdGVtcGVyYXR1cmUgcHJvZHVjdC4gV2VpZ2h0IGFuZCBub3Qg dG9vIGxhcmdlIE9EIGlzIGFuIGlzc3VlIGFzIHdlbGwgKDUgZmVldCB3aWxsIGJlIHVzZWQgZm9y IHRoZSBlbnRpcmUgY2lyY3VpdCkuIEkgaGF2ZSBpZGVudGlmaWVkIEFlcm9xdWlwIDYwMS04IHdp dGggU1Mgb3V0ZXIgYXMgdGhlIG1vc3QgbGlrZWx5IHByb2R1Y3QgKCQyMC9mb290IGZyb20gQWly Y3JhZnQgU3BydWNlKSBidXQgYmVmb3JlIEkgcGxhY2UgYW4gb3JkZXIgSSBsaWtlIHRvIGhlYXIg eW91ciBvcGluaW9uLg0KVGhhbmtzLA0KQ2hyaXN0b3BoIEJvdGgNCiMyMjMgV29sZnZpbGxlLCBO b3ZhIFNjb3RpYSwgQ2FuYWRhDQpFVVJPUEEgQ2xhc3NpYyBSb3RheCA5MTJTIFdvb2Rjb21wIFNS IDMwMDAsIDItYmxhZGUsIGluIHBlcnBldHVhbCBzdGF0ZSBvZiBjb21wbGV0aW9u4oCmLg0K77+9 77+977+9fu+/ve+/vSzvv73vv73vv70l77+977+9TTTvv73vv73vv71477+977+977+977+9d++/ vXLvv73vv73vv73vv70NCmJzcDsgICAgLS0gUGxlYXNlIFN1cHBvcnQgWW91ciBMaXN0cyBUaGlz IE1vbnRoIC0tDQotPSAgIE5vdmVtYmVyIGlzIHRoZSBBbm51YWwgTGlzdCBGdW5kIFJhaXNlci4g IENsaWNrIG9ud3d3LmJ1aTsgKiBIb21lYnVpbHRIRUxQIHd3dy5ob21lYnVpbHRoZWxwLmNvbTxo dHRwOi8vd3d3LmhvbWVidWlsdGhlbHAuY29tLz4NCg= ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Max Cointe" <mcointe(at)free.fr>
Subject: First Flight Video N283JL
Date: Nov 28, 2011
Hi Jim, Unlike for babies birth of a plane is better than conception (except if you are a mechanical fanatic)! Enjoy flights of every kind including what we call here =9Cflights in a hangar=9D to express talks of pilots on ground. Max Cointe F-PMLH TriGear Kit #560 912ULS Airmaster 400 hours De : owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] De la part de jimpuglise(at)comcast.net Envoy=C3=A9 : dimanche 27 novembre 2011 17:40 =C3 : Europa List Objet : Europa-List: First Flight Video N283JL We were able to upload the video of N283JLs first flight to Youtube. Sue Jeffers took some excellent video and stills and Peter expertly edited it. The video is about 8 minutes long. To view it, go to Youtube and put "N283JL" into your search engine. We are now approaching 10 hours, everything seems to be running fine, and all temps have been in the green for the last two flights. Jim Puglise N283JL, XS Jabiru 3300 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 28, 2011
From: Frans Veldman <frans(at)privatepilots.nl>
Subject: Re: Diameter of 912 oil hose and oil hose type
On 11/28/2011 03:15 AM, Neville Eyre wrote: > What I was [ poorly] trying to say is fancy Teflon / Stainless lines are > not needed , and in fact difficult to hook up to the Rotax tank and > motor connections with the Aeroquip / Earls type fittings and too stiff > to run in the limited space easily.. [ and at 25 / $35 + an end !] The link a gave earlier in this thread points to a hose that is light weight, very flexible, and able to handle high temperatures. Rubber hoses age and need to be replaced at least every five years, are heavy, and not tolerant of very high temperatures. Normally you wouldn't need the additional protection of a "fancy" hose, but what if you have a crack in the exhaust and the resulting plume heats up the hose, or something breaks loose in the engine compartment (I once had a factory drip tray fall off during flight) and abbrases the oil hose? I have been flying with the standard rubber hoses and barb fittings, but when I took them off after one year I was glad I did so (one hose had softened considerably and had became a bit sticky) and I feel much more comfortable with my new "fancy" hoses. ;-) Frans ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "hpreusser" <hpreusser(at)vtxmail.ch>
Subject: Aluminium Pipe for Fuel Inlet
Date: Nov 28, 2011
Hello Tim Would like to have one too. Regards Hans-Peter Reusser Kit # 498 Hans-Peter Reusser Spiezbergstrasse 13 CH-3700 Spiez Switzerland T: +41 33 654 00 24 M: +41 78 748 00 24 Von: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] Im Auftrag von Tim Ward Gesendet: Sonntag, 27. November 2011 19:58 An: europa-list(at)matronics.com Betreff: Europa-List: Aluminium Pipe for Fuel Inlet Hi Europa Builders, I have had a request for more Aluminium pipes for the fuel Inlet between the =9Ccobra=9D and the fuel tank. Are there any other builders interested in one? See the attachment. Cheers, Tim Mono Classic #292 ZK-TIM Tim Ward, 12 Waiwetu Street, Fendalton, Christchurch 8052 New Zealand Ph; 03 3515166 Mob; 0210640221 email; ward.t(at)xtra.co.nz ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Tim Ward <ward.t(at)xtra.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Aluminium Pipe for Fuel Inlet
Date: Nov 29, 2011
Hello Hans Peter , That is fine. If you could send me a cheque (local is ok) for 45 Swiss franc s and I will send it to you as soon as possible. I have your address below so that is good. Many thanks, Tim Tim Ward 12 Waiwetu Street Fendalton, Christchurch, 8052 New Zealand. ward.t(at)xtra.co.nz Ph 64 3 3515166 Mob 0210640221 On 29/11/2011, at 6:48 AM, "hpreusser" wrote: > Hello Tim > > Would like to have one too. > > Regards Hans-Peter Reusser Kit # 498 > > Hans-Peter Reusser > Spiezbergstrasse 13 > CH-3700 Spiez > Switzerland > T: +41 33 654 00 24 > M: +41 78 748 00 24 > > > Von: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-serv er(at)matronics.com] Im Auftrag von Tim Ward > Gesendet: Sonntag, 27. November 2011 19:58 > An: europa-list(at)matronics.com > Betreff: Europa-List: Aluminium Pipe for Fuel Inlet > > Hi Europa Builders, > I have had a request for more Aluminium pipes for the fuel Inlet between t he =9Ccobra=9D and the fuel tank. > Are there any other builders interested in one? > See the attachment. > > Cheers, > > Tim > Mono Classic #292 ZK-TIM > > Tim Ward, > 12 Waiwetu Street, > Fendalton, > Christchurch 8052 > New Zealand > > Ph; 03 3515166 > Mob; 0210640221 > > email; ward.t(at)xtra.co.nz > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 29, 2011
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Just Two Days Left - Still Way Behind...
Dear Listers, There are just two more days left in this years List Fund Raiser. Over the last few weeks I have received some really nice comments from members on what the Lists have meant to them. I have included some of them below. Please read over the comments and ponder on your own feelings about the Lists and the support and camaraderie you have found here. We are still way behind last year in terms of the number of contributions. I really want to keep providing these services to the homebuilt community, but it take resources. Since there's no advertising budget or deep pockets to keep the operation a float, its solely your generosity during the Fund Raiser that keeps things going. Please make a Contribution today. If you've been putting off showing your support for the Lists, now is the time to do it! Make a contribution with a Credit Card or though PayPal at that Matronics Contribution web site: http://www.matronics.com/contribution Or, drop a check in the mail: Matronics / Matt Dralle 581 Jeannie Way Livermore, CA 94550 Thank you in advance for your support! Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator ==================== A Few List Member Comments ===================== I get a lot of useful information and satisfaction from belonging to your groups. Somehow you foster a great sense of community without the baggage that accompanies other lists. Dave S. We do appreciate you running the lists spam and advertising free. Jeff P. I am celebrating my first flight day and you and the lists deserve a thanks since without it my build would have taken twice as long. Chris L. I enjoy the list. Have my morning coffee with it! Buddy M. Your lists are the best investment of my time and money, bar none, when it comes to interfacing with my fellow amateur builders. Owen B. Keep it going!! Thanks for taking over. Wallace J. I enjoy the Pietenpol List a lot. Malcolm Z. Thanks for your great site! As a new CJ-6 owner, your web site is an invaluable resource. Ken B. Great informational source. Fred S. Thanks for doing this! Lance G. Thank you for the service i do enjoy the many hours I use on line with the banter/ serious technical items. Noel G. Thanks for the years of builder support. Roy H. Great forum! Roger C. Thank you VERY MUCH, Matt, for carrying on with this great service. The "Europa" community really appreciates it. All the best, Svein - now celebrating 10 years as a subscriber, I think! Svein J. Matt, I'm building a much nicer and safer airplane because of your efforts. Robert D. 21 years for you 9 years for me on the Zenith lists. Could not imagine building and flying without Matronics. Brian U. Thanks for ALL the hard work and time you put into maintaining these forums. As an EAA Tech counselor I recommend them often. Paul M. This Pietenpol list is a huge part of the motivation that keeps me working on my project. This has been a great place for meeting like minded folks and getting help for the difficult parts. Thomas S. Thanks for the excellent service Matt. Frank S. Matt, I'm a Sonex building, but I have to say that the Piet group is without a doubt the most interesting. Ken M. I can't tell you how much I appreciate the Piet List. This is one of my sanity lifelines! Daniel H. Your site has provided us over the years with excellent connections to others for advice. Good job! Bob M. Kolb List is my #1 source! Henry V. Matt, you do a great job with this site. I've been with it since the beginning! John M. I am very grateful for all of your excellent work on the List. Arthur L. Thank you for the service you provide us all! Nicholas C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Christoph Both <christoph.both(at)acadiau.ca>
Subject: Diameter of 912 oil hose and oil hose type
Date: Nov 29, 2011
Hi Frans, Thanks for your thoughts. I ended up calling Rotax Canada - they had the right hose and the firesleeves, at quite a reasonable price. Lesson learned - ask Rotax first, then fan out. Thanks to all those taking the time to address my question. Christoph Europa TRI CLASSIC 912S, SR3000-2 blade prop, in final assembly after 16 years of slow building... -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Frans Veldman Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 4:47 AM Subject: Re: Europa-List: Diameter of 912 oil hose and oil hose type On 11/28/2011 03:15 AM, Neville Eyre wrote: > What I was [ poorly] trying to say is fancy Teflon / Stainless lines are > not needed , and in fact difficult to hook up to the Rotax tank and > motor connections with the Aeroquip / Earls type fittings and too stiff > to run in the limited space easily.. [ and at 25 / $35 + an end !] The link a gave earlier in this thread points to a hose that is light weight, very flexible, and able to handle high temperatures. Rubber hoses age and need to be replaced at least every five years, are heavy, and not tolerant of very high temperatures. Normally you wouldn't need the additional protection of a "fancy" hose, but what if you have a crack in the exhaust and the resulting plume heats up the hose, or something breaks loose in the engine compartment (I once had a factory drip tray fall off during flight) and abbrases the oil hose? I have been flying with the standard rubber hoses and barb fittings, but when I took them off after one year I was glad I did so (one hose had softened considerably and had became a bit sticky) and I feel much more comfortable with my new "fancy" hoses. ;-) Frans ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jeffrey Roberts <jeff(at)rmmm.net>
Subject: Rough River Dates September 21st & 22nd
Date: Nov 29, 2011
Hi All, Finally managed to get to Donna at Rough River lodge as she's been on vacation. She's the one that books the group blocks of rooms & cabins. When you call I would ask for her. I believe most everyone has agreed that the Labor Day weekend wasn't right and most wanted to go as close to October as possible. So here's the deal... The weekend of the 14th & 15th had sport aviation booked and not many rooms left. The weekend of the 28th & 29th had no avails due to a large wedding so that left us with either the 7&8th or the 21st & 22nd. So I went with the 21st & 22nd. I hope you all agree. I know some have shown an interest in the 1st week of October and the lodge has some opening's that weekend however going from memory I think weather can start being more of a factor then. The 28th & 29th is wide open as far as rooms go so unless I contact her we're good to go on that weekend. She has set aside a block of rooms and cabins to cover us based on years past but the sooner we each book the better we are. Last year was slow due to weather & commitments so lets turn this around and make 2012 the best yet. Hope this is good for you all. If we as a group feel we should change lets chime in here and I'll get er done. I will also contact the weather gods early and put our order in for a fabulous weekend and suggest you all do the same. Just let me know and I'll start the list. Best Regards, Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush.... Flying great once again. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Andrew Sarangan <asarangan(at)gmail.com>
Date: Nov 29, 2011
Subject: Setting angle of incidence for bonding spar alignment bushes
I am about to embark on bonding the spar alignment bushes into the cockpit module (chapter 14). The manual says to set the wing spar parallel to the front of the seat back, and that this is good enough for now. That seems rather arbitrary to me, given that the tolerance required later is 2.5 +/- 0.05 degrees. I am confused how the angle of incidence can be adjusted in the future with the bushes already bonded in. Would it not be best if the bushes are bonded after setting the 2.5 deg incidence? But then I am uncertain how to infer the angle of incidence with the cockpit module sitting face down on the floor. Any thoughts from experienced builders would be appreciated! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Peter Jeffers" <pjeffers(at)talktalk.net>
Subject: Rough River Dates September 21st & 22nd
Date: Nov 29, 2011
Hi Jeff, We can only thank you for your good works and attempt at controlling the weather gods. However please can you confirm which week end we are going for. You have left an ambiguity. Is it 21st & 22nd or 28th & 29th? Pete -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Roberts Sent: 29 November 2011 18:35 Subject: Europa-List: Rough River Dates September 21st & 22nd Hi All, Finally managed to get to Donna at Rough River lodge as she's been on vacation. She's the one that books the group blocks of rooms & cabins. When you call I would ask for her. I believe most everyone has agreed that the Labor Day weekend wasn't right and most wanted to go as close to October as possible. So here's the deal... The weekend of the 14th & 15th had sport aviation booked and not many rooms left. The weekend of the 28th & 29th had no avails due to a large wedding so that left us with either the 7&8th or the 21st & 22nd. So I went with the 21st & 22nd. I hope you all agree. I know some have shown an interest in the 1st week of October and the lodge has some opening's that weekend however going from memory I think weather can start being more of a factor then. The 28th & 29th is wide open as far as rooms go so unless I contact her we're good to go on that weekend. She has set aside a block of rooms and cabins to cover us based on years past but the sooner we each book the better we are. Last year was slow due to weather & commitments so lets turn this around and make 2012 the best yet. Hope this is good for you all. If we as a group feel we should change lets chime in here and I'll get er done. I will also contact the weather gods early and put our order in for a fabulous weekend and suggest you all do the same. Just let me know and I'll start the list. Best Regards, Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush.... Flying great once again. ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Peter Jeffers" <pjeffers(at)talktalk.net>
Subject: Setting angle of incidence for bonding spar alignment
bushes
Date: Nov 29, 2011
Hi Andrew, The wing incidence is pre determined by the pre drilled bushes in both the wing spars and the fuselage. The angle of attack does need to be set by you. Parallel to the front of the seat back refers to both spars being parallel to the seat back when viewed from ABOVE. Hope this will give you a different view on the problem Pete Europa club LAA inspector -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Sarangan Sent: 29 November 2011 18:57 Subject: Europa-List: Setting angle of incidence for bonding spar alignment bushes I am about to embark on bonding the spar alignment bushes into the cockpit module (chapter 14). The manual says to set the wing spar parallel to the front of the seat back, and that this is good enough for now. That seems rather arbitrary to me, given that the tolerance required later is 2.5 +/- 0.05 degrees. I am confused how the angle of incidence can be adjusted in the future with the bushes already bonded in. Would it not be best if the bushes are bonded after setting the 2.5 deg incidence? But then I am uncertain how to infer the angle of incidence with the cockpit module sitting face down on the floor. Any thoughts from experienced builders would be appreciated! ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Rough River Dates September 21st & 22nd
From: Jeffrey Roberts <jeff(at)rmmm.net>
Date: Nov 29, 2011
See thats what happens when I get in a hurry and more frequently as I get older. It's the 21st & the 22nd. Thanks for the correction Pete. Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush On Nov 29, 2011, at 1:18 PM, Peter Jeffers wrote: > > Hi Jeff, > We can only thank you for your good works and attempt at controlling the > weather gods. However please can you confirm which week end we are going > for. You have left an ambiguity. Is it 21st & 22nd or 28th & 29th? > Pete > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Roberts > Sent: 29 November 2011 18:35 > To: europa-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Europa-List: Rough River Dates September 21st & 22nd > > > Hi All, > Finally managed to get to Donna at Rough River lodge as she's been on > vacation. She's the one that books the group blocks of rooms & cabins. When > you call I would ask for her. > I believe most everyone has agreed that the Labor Day weekend wasn't right > and most wanted to go as close to October as possible. So here's the deal... > The weekend of the 14th & 15th had sport aviation booked and not many rooms > left. The weekend of the 28th & 29th had no avails due to a large wedding so > that left us with either the 7&8th or the 21st & 22nd. So I went with the > 21st & 22nd. I hope you all agree. I know some have shown an interest in the > 1st week of October and the lodge has some opening's that weekend however > going from memory I think weather can start being more of a factor then. The > 28th & 29th is wide open as far as rooms go so unless I contact her we're > good to go on that weekend. She has set aside a block of rooms and cabins to > cover us based on years past but the sooner we each book the better we are. > Last year was slow due to weather & commitments so lets turn this around and > make 2012 the best yet. > Hope this is good for you all. If we as a group feel we should change lets > chime in here and I'll get er done. I will also contact the weather gods > early and put our order in for a fabulous weekend and suggest you all do the > same. Just let me know and I'll start the list. > > Best Regards, > > Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush.... Flying great once again. > > > > > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Rough River Dates September 21st & 22nd
From: Robert Borger <rlborger(at)mac.com>
Date: Nov 29, 2011
Hi Jeff & All, >From your explanation of choice of dates being 7/8 or 21/22, I'm assuming that the 2nd reference to 28th & 29th is in error and you actually mean 21st & 22nd. Upon clarification, I will call Donna and reserve a room (as I hope to fly mine up this year). Blue skies & tailwinds, Bob Borger Europa XS Tri, Rotax 914, Airmaster C/S Prop. Little Toot Sport Biplane, Lycoming Thunderbolt AEIO-320 EXP 3705 Lynchburg Dr. Corinth, TX 76208-5331 Cel: 817-992-1117 rlborger(at)mac.com On Nov 29, 2011, at 12:34 PM, Jeffrey Roberts wrote: > > Hi All, > Finally managed to get to Donna at Rough River lodge as she's been on vacation. She's the one that books the group blocks of rooms & cabins. When you call I would ask for her. > I believe most everyone has agreed that the Labor Day weekend wasn't right and most wanted to go as close to October as possible. So here's the deal... The weekend of the 14th & 15th had sport aviation booked and not many rooms left. The weekend of the 28th & 29th had no avails due to a large wedding so that left us with either the 7&8th or the 21st & 22nd. So I went with the 21st & 22nd. I hope you all agree. I know some have shown an interest in the 1st week of October and the lodge has some opening's that weekend however going from memory I think weather can start being more of a factor then. The 28th & 29th is wide open as far as rooms go so unless I contact her we're good to go on that weekend. She has set aside a block of rooms and cabins to cover us based on years past but the sooner we each book the better we are. Last year was slow due to weather & commitments so lets turn this around and make 2012 the best yet. > Hope this is good for you all. If we as a group feel we should change lets chime in here and I'll get er done. I will also contact the weather gods early and put our order in for a fabulous weekend and suggest you all do the same. Just let me know and I'll start the list. > > Best Regards, > > Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush.... Flying great once again. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Andrew Sarangan <asarangan(at)gmail.com>
Date: Nov 29, 2011
Subject: Re: Setting angle of incidence for bonding spar alignment
bushes Hi Pete, Thanks for that response. It is good to know that the drilled holes are predetermined for the correct angle. My concern actually arose from reading others' posting that the the pins were difficult to engage, which I assumed came from small twists during the angle setting process. These are long bolts, so I suspect even a fraction of a degree rotation would cause the holes to become misaligned. If I could somehow verify using some reference points inside the cockpit module that the bushes I am about to bond are actually at the correct angle, that would be a great relief. On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Peter Jeffers wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > The wing incidence is pre determined by the pre drilled bushes in both the > wing spars and the fuselage. The angle of attack does need to be set by > you. Parallel to the front of the seat back refers to both spars being > parallel to the seat back when viewed from ABOVE. > > > Hope this will give you a different view on the problem > > > Pete Europa club LAA inspector > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Sarangan > Sent: 29 November 2011 18:57 > To: Europa List > Subject: Europa-List: Setting angle of incidence for bonding spar alignment > bushes > > > I am about to embark on bonding the spar alignment bushes into the > > cockpit module (chapter 14). The manual says to set the wing spar > > parallel to the front of the seat back, and that this is good enough > > for now. That seems rather arbitrary to me, given that the tolerance > > required later is 2.5 +/- 0.05 degrees. I am confused how the angle of > > incidence can be adjusted in the future with the bushes already bonded > > in. Would it not be best if the bushes are bonded after setting the > > 2.5 deg incidence? But then I am uncertain how to infer the angle of > > incidence with the cockpit module sitting face down on the floor. Any > > thoughts from experienced builders would be appreciated! > > > ----- > > No virus found in this message. > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Peter Jeffers" <pjeffers(at)talktalk.net>
Subject: Setting angle of incidence for bonding spar alignment
bushes
Date: Nov 29, 2011
Hi Andrew, It is a long time ago that I did this bit so my memory is a little hazy but the pins are not actually a tight fit and the bushes themselves are quite short. I have worked with a number of builders through this phase and none have had a problem. To be quite honest none of them have really raised any questions, they followed the instructions in the manual and all worked OK. It is good that you have thought through and anticipated problems but in this instance it probably seems worse than it is. Pete Europa Club LAA inspector -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Sarangan Sent: 29 November 2011 19:55 Subject: Re: Europa-List: Setting angle of incidence for bonding spar alignment bushes Hi Pete, Thanks for that response. It is good to know that the drilled holes are predetermined for the correct angle. My concern actually arose from reading others' posting that the the pins were difficult to engage, which I assumed came from small twists during the angle setting process. These are long bolts, so I suspect even a fraction of a degree rotation would cause the holes to become misaligned. If I could somehow verify using some reference points inside the cockpit module that the bushes I am about to bond are actually at the correct angle, that would be a great relief. On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Peter Jeffers wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > The wing incidence is pre determined by the pre drilled bushes in both the > wing spars and the fuselage. The angle of attack does need to be set by > you. Parallel to the front of the seat back refers to both spars being > parallel to the seat back when viewed from ABOVE. > > > Hope this will give you a different view on the problem > > > Pete Europa club LAA inspector > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Sarangan > Sent: 29 November 2011 18:57 > To: Europa List > Subject: Europa-List: Setting angle of incidence for bonding spar alignment > bushes > > > I am about to embark on bonding the spar alignment bushes into the > > cockpit module (chapter 14). The manual says to set the wing spar > > parallel to the front of the seat back, and that this is good enough > > for now. That seems rather arbitrary to me, given that the tolerance > > required later is 2.5 +/- 0.05 degrees. I am confused how the angle of > > incidence can be adjusted in the future with the bushes already bonded > > in. Would it not be best if the bushes are bonded after setting the > > 2.5 deg incidence? But then I am uncertain how to infer the angle of > > incidence with the cockpit module sitting face down on the floor. Any > > thoughts from experienced builders would be appreciated! > > > ----- > > No virus found in this message. > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Peter Jeffers" <pjeffers(at)talktalk.net>
Subject: Rough River Dates September 21st & 22nd
Date: Nov 29, 2011
Jeff, Thank you for the clarification. That weekend may just put it out of range for us coming from the UK. One of our daughters is getting married just days before that and we had hoped to come to Florida first so that we could drive up to RR from there to support N283JL. We will have to wait till nearer the time for a final decision. Pete & Sue -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Roberts Sent: 29 November 2011 19:35 Subject: Re: Europa-List: Rough River Dates September 21st & 22nd See thats what happens when I get in a hurry and more frequently as I get older. It's the 21st & the 22nd. Thanks for the correction Pete. Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush On Nov 29, 2011, at 1:18 PM, Peter Jeffers wrote: > > Hi Jeff, > We can only thank you for your good works and attempt at controlling the > weather gods. However please can you confirm which week end we are going > for. You have left an ambiguity. Is it 21st & 22nd or 28th & 29th? > Pete > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Roberts > Sent: 29 November 2011 18:35 > To: europa-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Europa-List: Rough River Dates September 21st & 22nd > > > Hi All, > Finally managed to get to Donna at Rough River lodge as she's been on > vacation. She's the one that books the group blocks of rooms & cabins. When > you call I would ask for her. > I believe most everyone has agreed that the Labor Day weekend wasn't right > and most wanted to go as close to October as possible. So here's the deal... > The weekend of the 14th & 15th had sport aviation booked and not many rooms > left. The weekend of the 28th & 29th had no avails due to a large wedding so > that left us with either the 7&8th or the 21st & 22nd. So I went with the > 21st & 22nd. I hope you all agree. I know some have shown an interest in the > 1st week of October and the lodge has some opening's that weekend however > going from memory I think weather can start being more of a factor then. The > 28th & 29th is wide open as far as rooms go so unless I contact her we're > good to go on that weekend. She has set aside a block of rooms and cabins to > cover us based on years past but the sooner we each book the better we are. > Last year was slow due to weather & commitments so lets turn this around and > make 2012 the best yet. > Hope this is good for you all. If we as a group feel we should change lets > chime in here and I'll get er done. I will also contact the weather gods > early and put our order in for a fabulous weekend and suggest you all do the > same. Just let me know and I'll start the list. > > Best Regards, > > Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush.... Flying great once again. > > > > > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > > > > ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Setting angle of incidence for bonding spar alignment
bushes
From: Kingsley Hurst <kingsnjan(at)westnet.com.au>
Date: Nov 30, 2011
Andrew, I shared your dilemma when at the same stage. A couple of pertinent points that may assist ...... 1 When the cockpit module is installed, the seat back is reclined at 2.5 degrees to the horizontal axis of the aircraft hence the need to set up the spars parallel to the seat back.. 2 You will find that the bushes you have to fit are quite a sloppy fit on the main wing pins which allows for considerable tolerance. 3 I'm fairly sure the 2.5 +/- 0.05 degrees reference is in relation to each wing rather than the incidence setting overall. If you go ahead as per the manual taking as much care as you can, you can expect things to turn out like you hope. All the best Kingsley Sent from my iPhone On 30/11/2011, at 4:57 AM, Andrew Sarangan wrote: > > I am about to embark on bonding the spar alignment bushes into the > cockpit module (chapter 14). The manual says to set the wing spar > parallel to the front of the seat back, and that this is good enough > for now. That seems rather arbitrary to me, given that the tolerance > required later is 2.5 +/- 0.05 degrees. I am confused how the angle of > incidence can be adjusted in the future with the bushes already bonded > in. Would it not be best if the bushes are bonded after setting the > 2.5 deg incidence? But then I am uncertain how to infer the angle of > incidence with the cockpit module sitting face down on the floor. Any > thoughts from experienced builders would be appreciated! > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 30, 2011
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: [Please Read] - Last Official Day of List Fund Raiser!
Dear Listers, Its November 30th and that means a couple of things. Its my birthday again, 48 of them, in fact! But it also means that its that last official day of the Matronics Email List Fund Raiser! If you been jones'n over one of those really nice incentive gifts now is the time to jump on one!! If you've been meaning to make a Contribution this month but have been putting it off for some reason, NOW is the time! I will be posting the List of Contributors in a few days, so you'll probably want to be known as a person that supported the Lists! I want to thank everyone that has so generously made a Contribution this year in support of our Lists. It is your generosity that keeps this operation running and I don't ever forget it. Hopefully everyone feels the same. Below are a few more of the nice comments from Listers I've received this year. Please read them over and see if you don't agree. The List Contribution Web Site is fast and easy. Please support our habit by making your Contribution right now: http://www.matronics.com/contribution Or, by dropping a personal check in the mail to: Matt Dralle / Matronics 581 Jeannie Way Livermore CA 94550 Thank you to all in advance! Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator ==================== A Few More List Member Comments ===================== I never would have ended up with the great flying airplane I have without the help of people on the Pietenpol list. Thanks for giving us the medium to communicate our questions, tips and suggestions. Matt P. Thanks for the hard work and maintaining the site commercial free. Good luck for the future and this site has been a source of great friendship. Peter B. It is a great resource. Jim G. Thanks so much for your continuing support of the homebuilt community. Gerald A. You are doing an outstanding job running the list's. Keep it going. Bill V. Thanks for keeping this valuable information source going. Best of all the forums. George A. Another Great year on the RV-List! Thomas E. Still the best source of information (& opinion) for builders on a wide range of issues. Martin H. Matt, thanks for hosting and maintaining the lists! Rumen D. It is a great resource. Bryan R. Thanks for your continuing interest in Van's RV8 kitplanes. Peter C. I'm no longer building or flying but like to keep in touch with the current generation of builders. Best wishes to a great list system. Gerry C. A great list that is most useful for builders. Graham H. Thanks for this wonderful tool! Ralph C. Thanks for a great service to the experimental aviation community. Douglas D. Great topics and loads of useful info keep the subject matter relevant. George H. Thanks for keeping this going. Richard R. Great facility and well managed. Victor F. Thanks for a great service. John D. Thank you for you time and efforts they have made Aviation a better place for everyone. Jim W. I still enjoy getting the list in the morning. Don M. You provide a great resource. David M. You have probably saved a few necks over the years. Robert F. Thank you for being there. Benjamin B. You perform a great service. Bruce M. Thank you for providing this invaluable resource. William D. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Joyce" <davidjoyce(at)doctors.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Setting angle of incidence for bonding spar alignment
bushes
Date: Nov 30, 2011
Andrew, A couple of points possibly of value : 1) When setting up the wings the manual (or at least my version of it) talks about checking that the distance from wing tip to tail on each side is the same. This manoevre led me to all sorts of confusion, which was only settled when I realised that there is only one sensible location for the spars and that is tight against the seat back. You definitely do not want the spars set back from the seat back with the spar pins bridging the gap, which would be asking the spar pins to do more than they are designed for. I would advise setting up the spars with some pieces of wood jammed behind them in the tunnel to ensure they are tight aginst the seat back. If one wing tip is a 1/2" closer to the tail than the other it is because the fueslage or your fixing of the cockpit module is less than absolutely symmetrical, but it is of no consequence. 2) The location of the spars gives an approximation to the right rigging angle for the wings, but the precise angle is set by your positioning of the lift pins. I would strongly recommend buying or borrowing a Smartool (which measures to 1/10 degree, to ensure that you get the two wings set as close the same angle as possible. Even a small difference in rigging angle will of course leave you with an irritating lateral trim issue and quite possibly to a built in tendency to drop a wing in the stall. Regards, David Joyce, G-XSDJ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Sarangan" <asarangan(at)gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 6:57 PM Subject: Europa-List: Setting angle of incidence for bonding spar alignment bushes > > I am about to embark on bonding the spar alignment bushes into the > cockpit module (chapter 14). The manual says to set the wing spar > parallel to the front of the seat back, and that this is good enough > for now. That seems rather arbitrary to me, given that the tolerance > required later is 2.5 +/- 0.05 degrees. I am confused how the angle of > incidence can be adjusted in the future with the bushes already bonded > in. Would it not be best if the bushes are bonded after setting the > 2.5 deg incidence? But then I am uncertain how to infer the angle of > incidence with the cockpit module sitting face down on the floor. Any > thoughts from experienced builders would be appreciated! > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Tony Renshaw <tonyrenshaw268(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Moulding material
Date: Nov 30, 2011
Gidday, I am attempting to remould my door tang fuselage recesses, with the doors open and the top off the fuselage, doors on. I have only opened up the original recesses on their inboard ends, leaving the hing attachment areas as original. The door tangs protrude up into the space and I could always spend hours gluing pieces of foam onto the tangs when taped, and then try and tidy up their shapes, then glass over the top of that and in time dissolve the foam. I am wondering if there is another way, maybe using glad wrap, thin plastic sandwich wrap, and modelling clay. I am wondering if anyone has a moulding material that is easy to shape, and easy to dissolve away leaving a nice surface afterwards. If not, well I'll just struggle on but there must be an easier way that currently escapes me. Reg Tony Renshaw Sydney Aussie. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Peter Zutrauen <peterz(at)zutrasoft.com>
Date: Nov 30, 2011
Subject: Re: Setting angle of incidence for bonding spar alignment
bushes Hi Andrew, It's great to hear you've got back at it! Are you going to be updating your website again? My status? Sadly still at 1% due to about 10 false starts due to life. Just bought into a 1946 Canuck tho (created the not for profit "Heritage Fun Fliers Inc", so I'm back flying after a 10 year absence. Quite the motivator! Now that the snag list on the Canuck is gone, I'm about to try for #11, but this time with the Canuck to spur me onwards, I plan to keep at it. My website has also been dead for about 10 years too. Cheers & blue skies, Pete :) On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Andrew Sarangan wrote: > > Hi Pete, > Thanks for that response. It is good to know that the drilled holes > are predetermined for the correct angle. My concern actually arose > from reading others' posting that the the pins were difficult to > engage, which I assumed came from small twists during the angle > setting process. These are long bolts, so I suspect even a fraction of > a degree rotation would cause the holes to become misaligned. If I > could somehow verify using some reference points inside the cockpit > module that the bushes I am about to bond are actually at the correct > angle, that would be a great relief. > > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Peter Jeffers > wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > The wing incidence is pre determined by the pre drilled bushes in both > the > > wing spars and the fuselage. The angle of attack does need to be set by > > you. Parallel to the front of the seat back refers to both spars being > > parallel to the seat back when viewed from ABOVE. > > > > > > > > Hope this will give you a different view on the problem > > > > > > > > Pete Europa club LAA inspector > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com > > [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Andrew > Sarangan > > Sent: 29 November 2011 18:57 > > To: Europa List > > Subject: Europa-List: Setting angle of incidence for bonding spar > alignment > > bushes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am about to embark on bonding the spar alignment bushes into the > > > > cockpit module (chapter 14). The manual says to set the wing spar > > > > parallel to the front of the seat back, and that this is good enough > > > > for now. That seems rather arbitrary to me, given that the tolerance > > > > required later is 2.5 +/- 0.05 degrees. I am confused how the angle of > > > > incidence can be adjusted in the future with the bushes already bonded > > > > in. Would it not be best if the bushes are bonded after setting the > > > > 2.5 deg incidence? But then I am uncertain how to infer the angle of > > > > incidence with the cockpit module sitting face down on the floor. Any > > > > thoughts from experienced builders would be appreciated! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > > No virus found in this message. > > > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Peter Zutrauen <peterz(at)zutrasoft.com>
Date: Nov 30, 2011
Subject: Re: Setting angle of incidence for bonding spar alignment
bushes Sorry all, wasn't meant for the list. Guess that means I *gotta* keep at it now ;-) Cheers, Pete On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Peter Zutrauen wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > It's great to hear you've got back at it! Are you going to be updating > your website again? > > My status? Sadly still at 1% due to about 10 false starts due to life. > Just bought into a 1946 Canuck tho (created the not for profit "Heritage > Fun Fliers Inc", so I'm back flying after a 10 year absence. Quite the > motivator! Now that the snag list on the Canuck is gone, I'm about to try > for #11, but this time with the Canuck to spur me onwards, I plan to keep > at it. My website has also been dead for about 10 years too. > > Cheers & blue skies, > Pete :) > > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Andrew Sarangan wrote: > >> >> Hi Pete, >> Thanks for that response. It is good to know that the drilled holes >> are predetermined for the correct angle. My concern actually arose >> from reading others' posting that the the pins were difficult to >> engage, which I assumed came from small twists during the angle >> setting process. These are long bolts, so I suspect even a fraction of >> a degree rotation would cause the holes to become misaligned. If I >> could somehow verify using some reference points inside the cockpit >> module that the bushes I am about to bond are actually at the correct >> angle, that would be a great relief. >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Peter Jeffers >> wrote: >> > Hi Andrew, >> > >> > The wing incidence is pre determined by the pre drilled bushes in both >> the >> > wing spars and the fuselage. The angle of attack does need to be set by >> > you. Parallel to the front of the seat back refers to both spars being >> > parallel to the seat back when viewed from ABOVE. >> > >> > >> > >> > Hope this will give you a different view on the problem >> > >> > >> > >> > Pete Europa club LAA inspector >> > >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com >> > [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Andrew >> Sarangan >> > Sent: 29 November 2011 18:57 >> > To: Europa List >> > Subject: Europa-List: Setting angle of incidence for bonding spar >> alignment >> > bushes >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > I am about to embark on bonding the spar alignment bushes into the >> > >> > cockpit module (chapter 14). The manual says to set the wing spar >> > >> > parallel to the front of the seat back, and that this is good enough >> > >> > for now. That seems rather arbitrary to me, given that the tolerance >> > >> > required later is 2.5 +/- 0.05 degrees. I am confused how the angle of >> > >> > incidence can be adjusted in the future with the bushes already bonded >> > >> > in. Would it not be best if the bushes are bonded after setting the >> > >> > 2.5 deg incidence? But then I am uncertain how to infer the angle of >> > >> > incidence with the cockpit module sitting face down on the floor. Any >> > >> > thoughts from experienced builders would be appreciated! >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > ----- >> > >> > No virus found in this message. >> > >> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 30, 2011
Subject: Re: Setting angle of incidence for bonding spar alignment
bushes
From: PHILLIPS I <ivor.phillips(at)ntlworld.com>
Pete That will be the only way you will get it finished :-) best wishes on the the 11 start and it will be worth it when complete, Regards Ivor phillips G-IVER On 30 November 2011 11:26, Peter Zutrauen wrote: > Sorry all, wasn't meant for the list. > > Guess that means I *gotta* keep at it now ;-) > > Cheers, > Pete > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Peter Zutrauen wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, >> >> It's great to hear you've got back at it! Are you going to be updating >> your website again? >> >> My status? Sadly still at 1% due to about 10 false starts due to >> life. Just bought into a 1946 Canuck tho (created the not for profit >> "Heritage Fun Fliers Inc", so I'm back flying after a 10 year absence. >> Quite the motivator! Now that the snag list on the Canuck is gone, I'm >> about to try for #11, but this time with the Canuck to spur me onwards, I >> plan to keep at it. My website has also been dead for about 10 years too. >> >> Cheers & blue skies, >> Pete :) >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Andrew Sarangan wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi Pete, >>> Thanks for that response. It is good to know that the drilled holes >>> are predetermined for the correct angle. My concern actually arose >>> from reading others' posting that the the pins were difficult to >>> engage, which I assumed came from small twists during the angle >>> setting process. These are long bolts, so I suspect even a fraction of >>> a degree rotation would cause the holes to become misaligned. If I >>> could somehow verify using some reference points inside the cockpit >>> module that the bushes I am about to bond are actually at the correct >>> angle, that would be a great relief. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Peter Jeffers >>> wrote: >>> > Hi Andrew, >>> > >>> > The wing incidence is pre determined by the pre drilled bushes in both >>> the >>> > wing spars and the fuselage. The angle of attack does need to be set >>> by >>> > you. Parallel to the front of the seat back refers to both spars being >>> > parallel to the seat back when viewed from ABOVE. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Hope this will give you a different view on the problem >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Pete Europa club LAA inspector >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -----Original Message----- >>> > From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com >>> > [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Andrew >>> Sarangan >>> > Sent: 29 November 2011 18:57 >>> > To: Europa List >>> > Subject: Europa-List: Setting angle of incidence for bonding spar >>> alignment >>> > bushes >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> asarangan(at)gmail.com> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > I am about to embark on bonding the spar alignment bushes into the >>> > >>> > cockpit module (chapter 14). The manual says to set the wing spar >>> > >>> > parallel to the front of the seat back, and that this is good enough >>> > >>> > for now. That seems rather arbitrary to me, given that the tolerance >>> > >>> > required later is 2.5 +/- 0.05 degrees. I am confused how the angle of >>> > >>> > incidence can be adjusted in the future with the bushes already bonded >>> > >>> > in. Would it not be best if the bushes are bonded after setting the >>> > >>> > 2.5 deg incidence? But then I am uncertain how to infer the angle of >>> > >>> > incidence with the cockpit module sitting face down on the floor. Any >>> > >>> > thoughts from experienced builders would be appreciated! >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > ----- >>> > >>> > No virus found in this message. >>> > >>> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>> > >>> >>> >>> ========== >>> ="_blank">www.aeroelectric.com >>> ooks.com" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com >>> et="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com >>> ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >>> le, List Admin. >>> ========== >>> target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List >>> ========== >>> http://forums.matronics.com >>> ========== >>> le, List Admin. >>> ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >>> ========== >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > * > > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Andrew Sarangan <asarangan(at)gmail.com>
Date: Nov 30, 2011
Subject: Re: Setting angle of incidence for bonding spar alignment
bushes So, if I am understanding it correctly - set the spars firmly against the seat-back, then set the seat-back perfectly square against the canoe side walls when bonding the cockpit module, then all should be ok. If the manual had a stated that the seatback is already set at 2.5 degrees inclination this question would not have come up at all. I have found this in several areas of the manual. It tells you what to do but leaves out the why. It might be useful someday to create a user commentary addendum for each chapter, based on the insights and experience from other builders. May be that is something I can work on in the future. On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:29 AM, David Joyce wrote: > > Andrew, A couple of points possibly of value : > 1) When setting up the wings the manual (or at least my version of it) talks > about checking that the distance from wing tip to tail on each side is the > same. This manoevre led me to all sorts of confusion, which was only settled > when I realised that there is only one sensible location for the spars and > that is tight against the seat back. You definitely do not want the spars > set back from the seat back with the spar pins bridging the gap, which would > be asking the spar pins to do more than they are designed for. I would > advise setting up the spars with some pieces of wood jammed behind them in > the tunnel to ensure they are tight aginst the seat back. If one wing tip is > a 1/2" closer to the tail than the other it is because the fueslage or your > fixing of the cockpit module is less than absolutely symmetrical, but it is > of no consequence. > 2) The location of the spars gives an approximation to the right rigging > angle for the wings, but the precise angle is set by your positioning of the > lift pins. I would strongly recommend buying or borrowing a Smartool (which > measures to 1/10 degree, to ensure that you get the two wings set as close > the same angle as possible. Even a small difference in rigging angle will of > course leave you with an irritating lateral trim issue and quite possibly to > a built in tendency to drop a wing in the stall. > Regards, David Joyce, G-XSDJ > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Sarangan" <asarangan(at)gmail.com> > To: "Europa List" > Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 6:57 PM > > Subject: Europa-List: Setting angle of incidence for bonding spar alignment > bushes > > >> >> I am about to embark on bonding the spar alignment bushes into the >> cockpit module (chapter 14). The manual says to set the wing spar >> parallel to the front of the seat back, and that this is good enough >> for now. That seems rather arbitrary to me, given that the tolerance >> required later is 2.5 +/- 0.05 degrees. I am confused how the angle of >> incidence can be adjusted in the future with the bushes already bonded >> in. Would it not be best if the bushes are bonded after setting the >> 2.5 deg incidence? But then I am uncertain how to infer the angle of >> incidence with the cockpit module sitting face down on the floor. Any >> thoughts from experienced builders would be appreciated! >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jeffrey Roberts <jeff(at)rmmm.net>
Subject: Revised Letter for RR Dates September 21st & 22nd
Date: Nov 30, 2011
1st let me say I corrected my error on the letter below. If enough of you chime in and wish to move the date to October 4th & 5th I'll see what I can do. Now would be the time. 21st & 22nd had the most available as far as cabins & rooms but the 4th & 5th could work. Maybe some voting here? Hi All, Finally managed to get to Donna at Rough River lodge as she's been on vacation. She's the one that books the group blocks of rooms & cabins. When you call I would ask for her. I believe most everyone has agreed that the Labor Day weekend wasn't right and most wanted to go as close to October as possible. So here's the deal... The weekend of the 14th & 15th had sport aviation booked and not many rooms left. The weekend of the 28th & 29th had no avails due to a large wedding so that left us with either the 7&8th or the 21st & 22nd. So I went with the 21st & 22nd. I hope you all agree. I know some have shown an interest in the 1st week of October and the lodge has some opening's that weekend however going from memory I think weather can start being more of a factor then. The 21st & 22nd is wide open as far as rooms go so unless I contact her we're good to go on that weekend. She has set aside a block of rooms and cabins to cover us based on years past but the sooner we each book the better we are. Last year was slow due to weather & commitments so lets turn this around and make 2012 the best yet. Hope this is good for you all. If we as a group feel we should change lets chime in here and I'll get er done. I will also contact the weather gods early and put our order in for a fabulous weekend and suggest you all do the same. Just let me know and I'll start the list. Best Regards, Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush.... Flying great once again. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jeffrey Roberts <jeff(at)rmmm.net>
Subject: RR Rain Or Sun
Date: Nov 30, 2011
Click on this link and scroll down. It shows September is the best month for no rain but October is 2nd best so if changing the dates to October the 4th & 5th would get more of us there let me know and we'll do it. http://www.weather.com/weather/wxclimatology/monthly/graph/USKY0912 Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 30, 2011
From: jimpuglise(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: RR Rain Or Sun
Jeff- I know that the October dates would be better for Tony and Peter, and it would really be nice to have them. Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeffrey Roberts" <jeff(at)rmmm.net> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 10:21:48 AM Subject: Europa-List: RR Rain Or Sun Click on this link and scroll down. It shows September is the best month for no rain but October is 2nd best so if changing the dates to October the 4th & 5th would get more of us there let me know and we'll do it. http://www.weather.com/weather/wxclimatology/monthly/graph/USKY0912 Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 30, 2011
From: jimpuglise(at)comcast.net
Subject: Chattering brakes
I used the kit-furnished Jamar brake cylinders and Matco calipers. The brakes work fine, but there is about 1/8 play if you wiggle the calipers, and they chatter like crazy while in motion. If I exert just enough pressure to move the pucks a little, the chatter disappears. It appears to me that there is too much play in the calipers, but we checked the drawings, and everything is installed properly. Any ideas? Jim Puglise N283JL, now at 10.2 hours ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "craig" <craigb(at)onthenet.com.au>
Subject: Moulding material
Date: Dec 01, 2011
There is tony, I'll email you later with how I did it, got to run to work now Craig goldcoast -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tony Renshaw Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 8:35 PM Subject: Europa-List: Moulding material Gidday, I am attempting to remould my door tang fuselage recesses, with the doors open and the top off the fuselage, doors on. I have only opened up the original recesses on their inboard ends, leaving the hing attachment areas as original. The door tangs protrude up into the space and I could always spend hours gluing pieces of foam onto the tangs when taped, and then try and tidy up their shapes, then glass over the top of that and in time dissolve the foam. I am wondering if there is another way, maybe using glad wrap, thin plastic sandwich wrap, and modelling clay. I am wondering if anyone has a moulding material that is easy to shape, and easy to dissolve away leaving a nice surface afterwards. If not, well I'll just struggle on but there must be an easier way that currently escapes me. Reg Tony Renshaw Sydney Aussie. ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 30, 2011
Subject: Re: Chattering brakes
From: PHILLIPS I <ivor.phillips(at)ntlworld.com>
Hi Jim just a thought have you fitted the four spacers for the torque plate and brake pads I also used some copperslip between the spacers for lubrcation, another problem i had in the early days was the allen screws hold the discs to the wheels became loose even with the locking wire, this caused some noise when taxying, solved it by using loctite and locking wire, regards ivor G-IVER On 30 November 2011 17:58, wrote: > I used the kit-furnished Jamar brake cylinders and Matco calipers. The > brakes work fine, but there is about 1/8 play if you wiggle the calipers, > and they chatter like crazy while in motion. If I exert just enough > pressure to move the pucks a little, the chatter disappears. It appears to > me that there is too much play in the calipers, but we checked the > drawings, and everything is installed properly. > > Any ideas? > > Jim Puglise > N283JL, now at 10.2 hours > > * > > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 30, 2011
From: Jan de Jong <jan_de_jong(at)casema.nl>
Subject: Re: Setting angle of incidence for bonding spar alignment
bushes Andrew, Whether it did any good I don't know (yet), but I painted the fitting bolts (enlarging their diameter) before fitting the cockpit module bushes to the spars - hoping to increase future wiggle room for the spar pins. Jan de Jong ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jeffrey Roberts <jeff(at)rmmm.net>
Subject: Re: RR Rain Or Sun
Date: Nov 30, 2011
I'll work on it tomorrow and let you all know. I agree we need them all to come. Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush On Nov 30, 2011, at 11:45 AM, jimpuglise(at)comcast.net wrote: > Jeff- > > I know that the October dates would be better for Tony and Peter, and it would really be nice to have them. > > Jim > > From: "Jeffrey Roberts" <jeff(at)rmmm.net> > To: europa-list(at)matronics.com > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 10:21:48 AM > Subject: Europa-List: RR Rain Or Sun > > > Click on this link and scroll down. It shows September is the best month for no rain but October is 2nd best so if changing the dates to October the 4th & 5th would get more of us there let me know and we'll do it. > > http://www.weather.com/weather/wxclimatology/monthly/graph/USKY0912 > > > === > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jeffrey Roberts <jeff(at)rmmm.net>
Subject: Rough River Revised Date
Date: Dec 01, 2011
Hi All, In an effort to help all that want to attend I'm attempting to move the date for our RR fly in to October 5th & 6th. I should have conformation back today and I will forward it to you. Please hold off calling for any rooms till I post officially the revision. Lets all make this a big one. Regards, Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kjell Skogeland" <kjell.skogeland(at)telia.com>
Subject:
Date: Dec 01, 2011
test ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jeffrey Roberts <jeff(at)rmmm.net>
Subject: Fwd: Europa Fly IN Revised date Oct. 45th & 6th
Date: Dec 01, 2011
Europa Flyers, We have moved the date for the 2012 Europa Fly In at Rough River to October 5th & 6th. I hope this helps all to attend. As you can see by Donna's response below the lodging selection will be a little shorter however there is plenty available as of now. I would suggest we all that plan on attending get into action and book your cabin or room. I checked again with the weather gods... AKA weather.com and it seems the likelihood of a nice weekend is good. Again... the new date is October 5th & 6th 2012. Hope to see you all there. It would be nice to see you west cost boys again! ;-) Best Jeff R. N128LJ Gold Rush > > > On Dec 1, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Clark, Donna F (Parks) wrote: > > > Lodging is a little shorter. > For October 5-6 > 10 lodge rooms > 4 Standard Cottages > 1 Executive Cottage 'Handicapped Assailable (no oven) > Prices are still the same > I have no other cottages available for Oct.5-6,2012 > Let me know if this works if it does, I will resent the contract > Thanks > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 2011
Subject: Annual Dinner
From: Nigel Graham <nigel_graham@m-tecque.co.uk>
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; } An unashamed plug for the Europa Club, This is perhaps, mainly appropriate to UK based readers, but if circumstances allow =93 all are welcome. Every year, the Europa club organises an =9CAnnual Dinner=9D, usually in late January, to give the members and their wives/partners the opportunity to meet up in a stylish hotel, play golf, enjoy the spa and generally socialise. We try to keep the topic of conversation away from =9CAviation=9D so as not to bore the lad ies, but occasionally =9Cflying=9D does get discussed. This year we have as guest speaker, Ivan Shaw, creator of the Europa, who has kindly agreed to share some of the secrets of the trials and tribulations of the early days of the Europa=99s development during the frenetic three years of development. This should be fascinating, particularly to those owners that that bought their aircraft ready built and did not have the =9Cpleasure=9D of building! He has also agreed to give an insight into the development of the glider wing. The talk is scheduled to start at 16.00 (before dinner) The venue is The Hillidon Lakes Hotel, Hellidon, Daventry NN11 6GG (Google =9CThe Hillidon Lakes Hotel=9D) and the Date is Saturda y 21st January 2012. If you=99re a member of the club but have never considered joining in, now would be an ideal excuse. If you=99re not yet a member of the club but you would like to attend, now would be an ideal opportunity to join and benefit from half price membership (just =C2=A38 until next April ). We would love to welcome you to this and the many other flying, eating and socialising events that are being organised for the coming year. To book a Table at the dinner, please e-mail: irene.watson(at)ntlworld.com [1] To book a room at the hotel, e-mail: hellidonlakes(at)QHotels.co.uk [2] (mention =9CEuropa Club=9D for a discount rate) To Join the club, please e-mail: memsec(at)europaclub.org.uk [3] Apologies again for the plug, but we really would welcome as many new faces as possible. Nigel Links: ------ [1] mailto:irene.watson(at)ntlworld.com [2] mailto:hellidonlakes(at)QHotels.co.uk [3] mailto:memsec(at)europaclub.org.uk ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Peter Zutrauen <peterz(at)zutrasoft.com>
Date: Dec 02, 2011
Subject: Re: Annual Dinner
Could someone please video tape this landmark event? I'd be very grateful to get a copy of the vid! Cheers & Blue skies, Pete :-D A239 Ottawa, Canada On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Nigel Graham <nigel_graham@m-tecque.co.uk>wrote: > > An unashamed plug for the Europa Club, This is perhaps, mainly appropriat e > to UK based readers, but if circumstances allow ' all are welcome.***** * > > Every year, the Europa club organises an =93Annual Dinner=94, usually in late > January, to give the members and their wives/partners the opportunity to > meet up in a stylish hotel, play golf, enjoy the spa and generally > socialise. We try to keep the topic of conversation away from =93Aviatio n=94 > so as not to bore the ladies, but occasionally =93flying=94 does get disc ussed. > **** > > This year we have as guest speaker, Ivan Shaw, creator of the Europa, who > has kindly agreed to share some of the secrets of the trials and > tribulations of the early days of the Europa=92s development during the > frenetic three years of development. This should be fascinating, > particularly to those owners that that bought their aircraft ready built > and did not have the =93pleasure=94 of building! He has also agreed to g ive > an insight into the development of the glider wing. The talk is scheduled > to start at 16.00 (before dinner) **** > > The venue is The Hillidon Lakes Hotel, Hellidon, Daventry NN11 6GG (Googl e > =93The Hillidon Lakes Hotel=94) and the Date is Saturday 21st January 201 2.*** > * > > If you=92re a member of the club but have never considered joining in, no w > would be an ideal excuse. If you=92re not yet a member of the club but yo u > would like to attend, now would be an ideal opportunity to join and benef it > from half price membership (just =A38 until next April ). We would love t o > welcome you to this and the many other flying, eating and socialising > events that are being organised for the coming year.**** > > To book a Table at the dinner, please e-mail: irene.watson(at)ntlworld.com** * > * > > To book a room at the hotel, e-mail: hellidonlakes(at)QHotels.co.uk (mention > =93Europa Club=94 for a discount rate)**** > > To Join the club, please e-mail: memsec(at)europaclub.org.uk**** > > Apologies again for the plug, but we really would welcome as many new > faces as possible.**** > > Nigel**** > > * > =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Harrison" <ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: Calling Robert Frost.....
Date: Dec 03, 2011
Hi! Robert Frost please note that your new e-mail address doesn't work ........I copied and pasted it in to a message and demon mailer has said it is a bad host destination. Send me a message again please Robert. Since \I already deleted your older and working one ! Regards Bob Harrison. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Fred Klein <fklein(at)orcasonline.com>
Subject: GPS...
Date: Dec 03, 2011
Some time ago I bought a "Gizmo" receptacle for a Garmin 396/496 which I'd confidently installed on my central sub panel...alas, it appears that Garmin no longer is making those models. I'd been attracted to its size, versatility, functionality, relatively low cost, and its seemingly wide spread use and satisfaction by Europa buddies. So in today's market, I'm wondering if anyone would venture an opinion on currently manufactured GPS units as to whether or not they offer significant additional functionality...(?). My anticipated set up should serve for day/night VFR flight only, and will be based around a Dynon Skyview EFIS (7" screen) w/ 2.25" dia. back up ALT & ASI gauges. Panel will have a separate EMS from RWS which integrates with the RWS ECU which manages my MPEFI'ed aftermarket Sube-based powerplant. Skyview allows for split screen PFD/moving map...though Dynon promises future software updates for a fully functioning moving map sectional chart display, currently the moving map only shows terrain and heading. Although I like the idea of an always-on, separate screen, my hunch is that a stand-alone GPS will just be serving as back up once I have the Skyview moving map update. If that's so, I'm tempted to find a used 396/496. Comments or advice most welcome, Fred ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 03, 2011
From: jimpuglise(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: GPS...
Fred- I have the Air Gizmos receptacle and 396 in my plane. I have seen all sorts of 396 / 496 Garmins for sale through Sportys and other pilot shops. In fact, they appear to be real steals now. I paid over $ 2,000 for mine and I think I have seen them for 5-600. Jim Puglise ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fred Klein" <fklein(at)orcasonline.com> Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2011 5:53:53 PM Subject: Europa-List: GPS... Some time ago I bought a "Gizmo" receptacle for a Garmin 396/496 which I'd confidently installed on my central sub panel...alas, it appears that Garmin no longer is making those models. I'd been attracted to its size, versatility, functionality, relatively low cost, and its seemingly wide spread use and satisfaction by Europa buddies. So in today's market, I'm wondering if anyone would venture an opinion on currently manufactured GPS units as to whether or not they offer significant additional functionality...(?). My anticipated set up should serve for day/night VFR flight only, and will be based around a Dynon Skyview EFIS (7" screen) w/ 2.25" dia. back up ALT & ASI gauges. Panel will have a separate EMS from RWS which integrates with the RWS ECU which manages my MPEFI'ed aftermarket Sube-based powerplant. Skyview allows for split screen PFD/moving map...though Dynon promises future software updates for a fully functioning moving map sectional chart display, currently the moving map only shows terrain and heading. Although I like the idea of an always-on, separate screen, my hunch is that a stand-alone GPS will just be serving as back up once I have the Skyview moving map update. If that's so, I'm tempted to find a used 396/496. Comments or advice most welcome, Fred ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robert Borger <rlborger(at)mac.com>
Subject: Re: GPS...
Date: Dec 03, 2011
Fred, I agree with Jim. There are plenty of used (and a few new) 396 & 496 out there and they can be excellent bargains. For a real good price, I picked up a used 496 last year expecting just a 496, wall charger and carrying case. What came was a 496, spare rod antenna, little square antenna with window mount, XM weather antenna, bean bag mount, wall charger, auto charger with speaker, carrying case and a couple other pieces I can't remember off the top of my head right now. I had to put a new battery in it, but still, WHAT A BARGAIN! I bought Air Gizmo panel mount & XM antenna mount that allows the antenna to be moved from plane to plane (the XM Antenna is what you register with XM to get weather) so I can use the unit in my Europa or my Toot (should it ever be finished) and have weather in both without extra costs. Do some searching and see what you can come up with. Blue skies & tailwinds, Bob Borger http://www.europaowners.org/N914XL Europa XS, Short Wing, Intercooled Rotax 914 rlborger(at)mac.com Cel: 817-992-1117 On Dec 3, 2011, at 4:53 PM, Fred Klein wrote: > > Some time ago I bought a "Gizmo" receptacle for a Garmin 396/496 which I'd confidently installed on my central sub panel...alas, it appears that Garmin no longer is making those models. > > I'd been attracted to its size, versatility, functionality, relatively low cost, and its seemingly wide spread use and satisfaction by Europa buddies. > > So in today's market, I'm wondering if anyone would venture an opinion on currently manufactured GPS units as to whether or not they offer significant additional functionality...(?). > > My anticipated set up should serve for day/night VFR flight only, and will be based around a Dynon Skyview EFIS (7" screen) w/ 2.25" dia. back up ALT & ASI gauges. Panel will have a separate EMS from RWS which integrates with the RWS ECU which manages my MPEFI'ed aftermarket Sube-based powerplant. > > Skyview allows for split screen PFD/moving map...though Dynon promises future software updates for a fully functioning moving map sectional chart display, currently the moving map only shows terrain and heading. > > Although I like the idea of an always-on, separate screen, my hunch is that a stand-alone GPS will just be serving as back up once I have the Skyview moving map update. If that's so, I'm tempted to find a used 396/496. > > Comments or advice most welcome, > > Fred ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bud Yerly" <budyerly(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Chattering brakes
Date: Dec 03, 2011
Jim, Because we let our planes sit so long and so much dirt builds up on our wheels and brakes, obviously clean the slide pins and caliper bushes. I am sure your disk is installed correct and runs true. Roll the plane slowly and look at the disc track and caliper and check that all runs true. See the Matco website for tips in installation and caliper alignment. I have always just slid the caliper where it fit, but there is actually a procedure. See : http://static.veracart.com/matco/item_pdfs/2665/document1.pdf ic.veracart.com/matco/item_pdfs/2665/document1.pdf> I have never needed to lube the caliper slide pins, just a good cleaning and alignment is all that is normally needed. Next be sure to clean the disk well. Yours truly squirted Dot 5 silicone fluid on the disk during my bleed and sure enough, less than smooth performance and a required change of the pad due to poor braking quality. A good cleaning was all that was needed. Lastly, the Jamar doesn't normally transmit the vibration of the caliper if the adjustment forks that attach to your handles are screwed out a bit. If they are screwed down (toward the cylinder) until the pucks move in a bit holding slight pressure then your direct hydraulic transmission of the caliper movement will be quite noticeable. Congrats on your good looking plane and here's hoping the fly off and engine break in goes well. Regards, Bud ----- Original Message ----- From: jimpuglise(at)comcast.net<mailto:jimpuglise(at)comcast.net> To: Europa List Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 12:58 PM Subject: Europa-List: Chattering brakes I used the kit-furnished Jamar brake cylinders and Matco calipers. The brakes work fine, but there is about 1/8 play if you wiggle the calipers, and they chatter like crazy while in motion. If I exert just enough pressure to move the pucks a little, the chatter disappears. It appears to me that there is too much play in the calipers, but we checked the drawings, and everything is installed properly. Any ideas? Jim Puglise N283JL, now at 10.2 hours www.aeroelectric.com<http://www.aeroelectric.com/> www.buildersbooks.com<http://www.buildersbooks.com/> www.homebuilthelp.com<http://www.homebuilthelp.com/> http://www.matronics.com/contribution on> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List avigator?Europa-List> http://www.matronics.com/contribution on> ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 04, 2011
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Hardware Failure - Matronics Web Servers Currently Offline
failure and is currently not available. Replacement hardware has been ordered and should arrive on Tuesday 12/6/2011. All services should be restored shortly there after. During the outage, the Matronics Forums, Wiki, and other web-based List services will NOT be available. However, during the outage, all normal EMAIL based sevices WILL be available so you may continue to post messages to the various lists without an issue. I am so sorry for any inconvenience this web server outage has caused... Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Richard Iddon <riddon(at)sent.com>
Subject: SB's & AD's etc.
Date: Dec 04, 2011
Hi guys, I am just recommissioning my XS tri with 912S after being out of the country for 8 months and wondered if there have been any SB's or AD's etc which I need to comply with before renewing my permit. I have looked on the Europa Aircraft and Rotax web sites and can find nothing there. Richard Iddon G-RIXS XS Tri gear ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "G-IANI" <g-iani(at)ntlworld.com>
Subject: SB's & AD's etc.
Date: Dec 04, 2011
Richard The only ones I am aware of is for the glider wings (SB17 & 18) Ian Rickard G-IANI XS Trigear, 300hours Europa Club Mods Specialist e-mail g-iani(at)ntlworld.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Richard Iddon Sent: 04 December 2011 08:47 Subject: Europa-List: SB's & AD's etc. Hi guys, I am just recommissioning my XS tri with 912S after being out of the country for 8 months and wondered if there have been any SB's or AD's etc which I need to comply with before renewing my permit. I have looked on the Europa Aircraft and Rotax web sites and can find nothing there. Richard Iddon G-RIXS XS Tri gear ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Peter Jeffers" <pjeffers(at)talktalk.net>
Subject: SB's & AD's etc.
Date: Dec 04, 2011
Hi Richard, Welcome home. We just got back from Florida and are finding the short days rather limiting. Re AD's There are two from Rotax which is are made mandatory AD's by the CAA. They will probably will not apply to your engine but you will need to check. One concerns a washer in the gear box and the other (very recent) concerns a crankshaft inspection for potential cracks. The last one arose from a batch of crankshafts with a manufacturing fault. No new AD's on Tri Gears or Mono's Pete -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Richard Iddon Sent: 04 December 2011 08:47 Subject: Europa-List: SB's & AD's etc. Hi guys, I am just recommissioning my XS tri with 912S after being out of the country for 8 months and wondered if there have been any SB's or AD's etc which I need to comply with before renewing my permit. I have looked on the Europa Aircraft and Rotax web sites and can find nothing there. Richard Iddon G-RIXS XS Tri gear ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Tim Ward <ward.t(at)xtra.co.nz>
Subject: Re: SB's & AD's etc.
Date: Dec 04, 2011
Richard, Lately a big AD on Rotax crankshaft but equally big chance it won't affect your engine. Cheers, Tim Tim Ward 12 Waiwetu Street Fendalton, Christchurch, 8052 New Zealand. ward.t(at)xtra.co.nz Ph 64 3 3515166 Mob 0210640221 On 4/12/2011, at 9:47 PM, Richard Iddon wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I am just recommissioning my XS tri with 912S after being out of the country for 8 months and wondered if there have been any SB's or AD's etc which I need to comply with before renewing my permit. I have looked on the Europa Aircraft and Rotax web sites and can find nothing there. > > Richard Iddon > > G-RIXS XS Tri gear > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Harrison" <ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: SB's & AD's etc.
Date: Dec 04, 2011
Richard/Peter ...........with respect I think the washer was at the other end ? or am I thinking bloody Jabiru still !!!!! If it was a washer in the gearbox I may have the problem ?!!! Don't rely on what |I say Richard. Regards and Compliments of the season to you all. Bob Harrison G-PTAG -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Peter Jeffers Sent: 04 December 2011 09:36 Subject: RE: Europa-List: SB's & AD's etc. Hi Richard, Welcome home. We just got back from Florida and are finding the short days rather limiting. Re AD's There are two from Rotax which is are made mandatory AD's by the CAA. They will probably will not apply to your engine but you will need to check. One concerns a washer in the gear box and the other (very recent) concerns a crankshaft inspection for potential cracks. The last one arose from a batch of crankshafts with a manufacturing fault. No new AD's on Tri Gears or Mono's Pete -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Richard Iddon Sent: 04 December 2011 08:47 Subject: Europa-List: SB's & AD's etc. Hi guys, I am just recommissioning my XS tri with 912S after being out of the country for 8 months and wondered if there have been any SB's or AD's etc which I need to comply with before renewing my permit. I have looked on the Europa Aircraft and Rotax web sites and can find nothing there. Richard Iddon G-RIXS XS Tri gear ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: spinner cracks
From: Richard Iddon <riddon(at)sent.com>
Date: Dec 04, 2011
On the spinner for my Airmaster prop, I have noticed a couple of small cracks running from the fixing holes to the edge. Can anyone tell me is the spinner just aluminium or duralumin and is it possible to weld these cracks up or is it a new spinner? Richard Iddon G-RIXS ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Christoph Both <christoph.both(at)acadiau.ca>
Subject: SB's & AD's etc.
Date: Dec 04, 2011
For the Rotax 912, the washer is right under the bolt holding the flywheel. I recently took the flywheel off and checked. It is quite accessible, but you need the right tools, correctly tighten to specified torque, etc. Christoph Both #223 Wolfville, Nova Scotia -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Harrison Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 6:31 AM Subject: RE: Europa-List: SB's & AD's etc. Richard/Peter ...........with respect I think the washer was at the other end ? or am I thinking bloody Jabiru still !!!!! If it was a washer in the gearbox I may have the problem ?!!! Don't rely on what |I say Richard. Regards and Compliments of the season to you all. Bob Harrison G-PTAG -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Peter Jeffers Sent: 04 December 2011 09:36 Subject: RE: Europa-List: SB's & AD's etc. Hi Richard, Welcome home. We just got back from Florida and are finding the short days rather limiting. Re AD's There are two from Rotax which is are made mandatory AD's by the CAA. They will probably will not apply to your engine but you will need to check. One concerns a washer in the gear box and the other (very recent) concerns a crankshaft inspection for potential cracks. The last one arose from a batch of crankshafts with a manufacturing fault. No new AD's on Tri Gears or Mono's Pete -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Richard Iddon Sent: 04 December 2011 08:47 Subject: Europa-List: SB's & AD's etc. Hi guys, I am just recommissioning my XS tri with 912S after being out of the country for 8 months and wondered if there have been any SB's or AD's etc which I need to comply with before renewing my permit. I have looked on the Europa Aircraft and Rotax web sites and can find nothing there. Richard Iddon G-RIXS XS Tri gear ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Peter Jeffers" <pjeffers(at)talktalk.net>
Subject: SB's & AD's etc.
Date: Dec 04, 2011
Richard, Sorry I did not mean the gearbox for the first AD. As you say Chris, I should have said flywheel instead. Almost right. Pete -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Christoph Both Sent: 04 December 2011 13:51 Subject: RE: Europa-List: SB's & AD's etc. For the Rotax 912, the washer is right under the bolt holding the flywheel. I recently took the flywheel off and checked. It is quite accessible, but you need the right tools, correctly tighten to specified torque, etc. Christoph Both #223 Wolfville, Nova Scotia -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Harrison Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 6:31 AM Subject: RE: Europa-List: SB's & AD's etc. Richard/Peter ...........with respect I think the washer was at the other end ? or am I thinking bloody Jabiru still !!!!! If it was a washer in the gearbox I may have the problem ?!!! Don't rely on what |I say Richard. Regards and Compliments of the season to you all. Bob Harrison G-PTAG -----Original Message----- From: owner-europa-list-server(at)matronics.com


November 10, 2011 - December 04, 2011

Europa-Archive.digest.vol-jh