Kolb-Archive.digest.vol-ei

May 08, 2003 - June 11, 2003



      
      Chuck Davis
      Firefly 028
      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "James, Ken" <KDJames(at)berkscareer.com>
Subject: Fly-In at Winchester VA
Date: May 08, 2003
Bob Did you know a old marine pilot names Ray " Dallas" Wells he passed away awhile ago he was from Winchester, I lived there about 12 years ago . Reply of page if you like Kjamesdesign(at)yahoo.com Ken -----Original Message----- From: Bob N. [mailto:ronoy(at)shentel.net] Subject: Kolb-List: Fly-In at Winchester VA EAA ch 186 will have their Spring Fly-In at Winchester (VA) Regional Airport (OKV)Saturday & Sunday May 17,18. No FAA tower, just friendly folks welcoming anything that flies, including ULs (fat, thin, reg'ler). EAA judging. Pancake breakfast both days, soda &hamburg stand right on ramp. 100LL available, if a fellow ULer needs Mogas I can take cans to nearby gas station (2 mi). Five motels within 2-3 miles, at least five more a coupla miles further. Tie downs available--bring rope if all used up here. Here are the radio freqs: CTAF/UNICOM 122.7 APPR/DEP 120.45 CLRNC DEL 126.15 WX AWOS-3 124.85 Contact me for any questions. Y'all come, heah? Bob N. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GeoR38(at)aol.com
Date: May 08, 2003
Subject: Re: COLOR AND STRIPING IDEAS!!!
In a message dated 5/7/03 5:26:54 PM Eastern Daylight Time, duesouth(at)govital.net writes: > > > > > > > >] > >] Go in the archives and find a picture of my Thunderbird. It is a simple > >straight line paint scheme that attracts a lot of attention. > > > I meant go to the photo share and look for my flying totem pole > "THUNDERBIRD" > > > I looked but couldn't find it ....maybe if you gave the date? George Randolph ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 08, 2003
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Woody's MKIII mods
You widened the MKIII fuselage at the back and also changed the airfoil, and the relationship of the gap seal to the wing. How about a report on how those mods have worked out? Pros? Cons? Enquiring minds want to know... Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > >Go in the archives and find a picture of my Thunderbird. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Camping at Monument Valley
Date: May 08, 2003
I've just received an email from a friend who was camped at Goulding's in Monument Valley last week. He says it's a nice place and all, but there are groups coming in around the end of the time we'll be there, and there won't be any RV campsites. I took the advice the other week, and have reservations for my camper, but if you haven't yet, you'd better. Lar. Do not Archive. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Kolb Mk III - Vamoose N78LB www.gogittum.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: FRED2319(at)aol.com
Date: May 08, 2003
Subject: Mark 3 for sale
Hi Guys I still have my Mark 3,582 B drive 5 hr. sense rebuild for sale. No one has came and looked at it had a bunch of calls. Fred Brown Ohio 419 694 4315 $14000 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Doug Wetzel <dougwe(at)wrq.com>
Subject: Mark 3 for sale
Date: May 08, 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Pictures, Fred? Doug Wetzel Seattle, WA - -----Original Message----- From: FRED2319(at)aol.com [mailto:FRED2319(at)aol.com] Subject: Kolb-List: Mark 3 for sale Hi Guys I still have my Mark 3,582 B drive 5 hr. sense rebuild for sale. No one has came and looked at it had a bunch of calls. Fred Brown Ohio 419 694 4315 $14000 == == == == -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQA/AwUBPrqA+3OHrG41gAgoEQLrFgCgpk+cP1I0hb/zErIyV6jZUWMFW7cAn2HV oim9SdBtYKFnULV21Ttkvtn7 =HP7v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: FRED2319(at)aol.com
Date: May 08, 2003
Subject: Re: Mark 3 for sale
________________________________________________________________________________
From: FRED2319(at)aol.com
Date: May 08, 2003
Subject: Re: Mark 3 for sale
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 08, 2003
From: woody <duesouth(at)govital.net>
Subject: Re: COLOR AND STRIPING IDEAS!!!
> > > > > > > > I looked but couldn't find it ....maybe if you gave the date? >George Randolph It should be after sept Kolb Picnic. Perhaps do a search for my name on the kolb Photoshare. I will try to find it later or I could send it to you off list. I am having trouble with my scanner so I can't send you a newer one. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GeoR38(at)aol.com
Date: May 08, 2003
Subject: Re: COLOR AND STRIPING IDEAS!!!
In a message dated 5/8/03 10:41:51 PM Eastern Daylight Time, duesouth(at)govital.net writes: > > > > It should be after sept Kolb Picnic. Perhaps do a search for my name on > the kolb Photoshare. I will try to find it later or I could send it to you > off list. I am having trouble with my scanner so I can't send you a newer > one. > no problem, woody, I found it ....looks great...and I remembered it from before. George Randolph ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: test
Date: May 08, 2003
h sjyjhm ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 08, 2003
From: woody <duesouth(at)govital.net>
Subject: Re: Woody's MKIII mods
> >You widened the MKIII fuselage at the back and also changed the airfoil, >and the relationship of the gap seal to the wing. How about a report on how >those mods have worked out? Pros? Cons? Enquiring minds want to know... Where to begin????? I was going to wait untill I had more experience with it before I wrote up a review. The initial problem I have with it is extremely heavy ailerons. Yesterday I finished installing the aileron balances and spade combination. I am hoping this will alleviate some of the heavyness. Because of this I did not do any real testing of the performance. I did enjoy some nice flights however, just needed a lot of muscle to turn it. This may be due to a mistake I made fabricating the ailerons. Late at night I was building them and in my infinite wisdom made the ailerons half the span of the wing and the flaps the other half. Unfortunately I forgot about that little gap there that the prop spins in so my flaps turned out to be only a couple feet long. These big ailerons are hard to move. The ailerons also do not come out to the wing tips. The aircraft does break ground about 32 mph and I have had it up to 85 accidentally. I want to keep it slower until I have doors on it. The wing airfoil came out of one of the EAA flying and glider manuals and was used on the Flying Bathtub. Impressive performance numbers and the same physical sizes and weights as a Kolb. The fuselage tapers at a 4/1 ratio from the wide point of the fuselage and ends abruptly 6 inches before the prop. My theory is that in a factory Kolb the air breaks away from the side at that wide point and causes drag. My air stays on the side until it is ready to go into the prop. Due to the extensive designs modifications I have made it is hard to tell what one specific element did to the performance. The nose is carved out of styrofoam and then fiberglassed. Doing this in the confines of a hanger it looked good. Once out and painted and I was able to stand a distance away from it I noticed the nose sort of droops down like a concord coming in for a landing. I was out in the hanger tonight adding stringers to get rid of that distraction. I will be gluing the fabric on with contact cement and then heat sealing the bond surfaces with the iron and then heat shrinking the fabric. I am going to try a white varathane paint rather than go to the bother of mixing up the 2 part automotive paint and wearing the respirator again. I mounted the 582 engine 2 inches farther back than plans call for. The engine mount holes are now in line with the engine case holes. I use a heavy battery in the front to counteract this but the weight and balance did not show the engine shift to be very significant for the CG. I will be installing a Jabiru after I get a couple more flights in with this present configuration. My Kolb also is defined as a parasol wing. The cabin does not run up into the leading edge. There is a 5 inch gap between the top of the cockpit and the bottom surface of my non removable gap seal. My theory on that was to gain an extra 3 feet of wing area and eliminate the drag caused by 2 separate wings in this area. It also gave me the design opportunity to make the cockpit sleeker and lower like a sports car rather than an old station wagon. I wish TNK would give me an opportunity to redesign the front enclosure of the Kolbra. A new pod could be built without changing the steel structure. It would sell a lot better if it was prettier. Not much else to say about it at this time except that my bottom tail wires are a bit different. My wire tangs are permanently bolted to the tail post. The wires are connected to these tangs with a clevis, a bolt, wing nut and a safety pin on each side. I find it easier to hook them up and the brace wires are tighter. I just discovered I did not post a bottom inflight picture to photo share. I did now so some day soon matt will post a new bunch of pictures and it will be there. If interested I can send it on request. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 09, 2003
From: "Robert Laird" <rlaird(at)cavediver.com>
Subject: cross-country...
I'm about to do a long cross-country... I'm no neophyte: I've done a 660 mile cross-country before. This one will be about 1,000 miles. But! It's over territory I've not been over before. I was hoping that some of you who know these areas may be able to make comments and suggestions about the route and/or the airports I'm stopping at. It's essentially an almost-straight North to South line from Minnesota to Texas. Here's the itinerary: Start: Litchfield, MN (LJF) then... Esterville, IA (EST) Audubon, IA (ADU) Maryville, MO (EVU) Lawrence, KS (LWC) Coffeyville,KS (CFV) Haskell, OK (2K9) Hugo, OK (HHW) Mineola, TX (3F9) Huntsville, TX (UTS) Many thanks for any info you can pass on about terrain, weather this time of year, airports, waypoints, etc.! -- Robert ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net>
Subject: Re: cross-country...
Date: May 09, 2003
what are you flying? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Laird" <rlaird(at)cavediver.com> Subject: Kolb-List: cross-country... > > I'm about to do a long cross-country... I'm no neophyte: I've done a 660 mile cross-country before. This one will be about 1,000 miles. > > But! It's over territory I've not been over before. I was hoping that some of you who know these areas may be able to make comments and suggestions about the route and/or the airports I'm stopping at. It's essentially an almost-straight North to South line from Minnesota to Texas. Here's the itinerary: > > Start: Litchfield, MN (LJF) > then... Esterville, IA (EST) > Audubon, IA (ADU) > Maryville, MO (EVU) > Lawrence, KS (LWC) > Coffeyville,KS (CFV) > Haskell, OK (2K9) > Hugo, OK (HHW) > Mineola, TX (3F9) > Huntsville, TX (UTS) > > > Many thanks for any info you can pass on about terrain, weather this time of year, airports, waypoints, etc.! > > -- Robert > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 09, 2003
From: "Robert Laird" <rlaird(at)cavediver.com>
Subject: Re: cross-country...
It's a Bucanneer amphibious ultralight with a 582 oil-injected... I'm ferrying it for a friend who's about to solo. -- Robert ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net> Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 00:37:14 -0500 > >what are you flying? >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Robert Laird" <rlaird(at)cavediver.com> >To: >Subject: Kolb-List: cross-country... > > >> >> I'm about to do a long cross-country... I'm no neophyte: I've done a 660 >mile cross-country before. This one will be about 1,000 miles. >> >> But! It's over territory I've not been over before. I was hoping that ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Williamson" <kolbrapilot(at)attbi.com>
Subject: Flying Photos
Date: May 10, 2003
Kolb Airmen, I'm just waiting for departure time to head to Monument Valley and points west and have started a webpage link to other webpages of photos taken from a Kolb vehicle or airplane. Here is what I have so far: http://home.attbi.com/~kolbrapilot/OtherKolbPhotos.htm If you know of a link to similar pages or have one of your own, I would like to include it in the list so everyone can enjoy the photos from the different parts of the world. This new page of links will be added to my website when I update it after returning from this upcoming trip. I should get back to Texas on 30 May. John Williamson Arlington, TX Kolb Kolbra, N49KK, Jabiru 2200, 257 hours http://home.attbi.com/~kolbrapilot ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 10, 2003
From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Flying Photos
> If you know of a link to similar pages or have one of your own, I would like to include it in the list so everyone can enjoy the photos from the different parts of the world. > John Williamson John W/Gang: I'm about ready to head West also. Got some little nit-picking things to do, load the plane, gas it up, and go for it. I'll probably depart here 15 May, unless it looks like I will have headwind or weather problems. If so, I'll leave 14 May, if I am ready (I should be). My first big stop will be Richard Harris's airstrip in Lewisville, Arkansas, between El Dorado and Texarkana. Hope to make about 600 miles the first day, get into Albuquerque, NM, the second day, and Monument Valley, Utah, the third day. Should be arriving MV on 17 or 18 May. Have you pinned down your departure date? I have lots of pictures from the 1994, 2000(as far north as Muncho Lake, BC), and 2001, flights to Alaska. Problem is they take lots of bandwidth to keep loaded on a web page. If you have lots of web space, would be glad to send you some of them to post. Also have pictures from my very early cross country flights in the Firestar. I am getting excited about the upcoming flight. I really look forward to renewing old friendships and making some new ones. My flight plan is in the GPS which is in the airplane, but roughly, I will be flying from Titus, Alabama, to: Eutaw, AL Lewisville, AR Texarkana, TX Wichita Falls, TX Amarillo, TX Santa Rosa, NM Albuquerque, NM Farmington, NM Monument Valley, UT After MV I plan to fly around the SW and some of California, Nevada, and Utah. My general route of flight back to Alabama will probably be the southern route along I-8 and I-10. I've got some buddies to visit in El Paso, San Antonio, then shoot for Titus, AL. Anybody along that flight line that is interested in a short visit, let me know. Be glad to stop by if it is not too far off my route of flight. I always tell myself I am going to take my time and really enjoy my flight, but when I get in my MK III, point the nose towards my destination, I am ready to make time. I don't spend much time on the ground, although I land quite frequently. My buddy John Williamson plans his flights with 4 hour legs. Mine are much shorter now days. With a 64 year old bladder, in spite of all the saw palmetto I take, I still have a one to two hour bladder. I like landing and meeting the people along my route of flight. Every place and everybody is a little different, but we all share a common cause of freedom for every individual and support of our great country. I finally got Miss P'fer a good bath and engine gunking this morning over at the Weumpka AP. Uneducated spam can driver comes out of the FBO and hollers at me washing my airplane, "Where's the rest of your airplane?" Oops! I don't like those kind of comments. I told him I never got a stupid, smart ass comment like that from anyone in Canada or anywhere in Alaska during two flights up there, only from dumb asses in the lower 48. He got in his little Cherokee or whatever it was, and left without saying a word or looking my way again. I know I should have smiled and made some cute comment, but sometimes they get my goat, and I have responded before I realize it. Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 10, 2003
From: Bob Bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: Flying Photos
> > > > > >> >> > > > I know I should have smiled and made some >cute comment, but sometimes they get my goat, and >I have responded before I realize it. > >Nahhhh, we all know you better than that John. :) > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 10, 2003
From: Rick & Martha Neilsen <neilsenrm(at)comcast.net>
Subject: VW Update
I have app. 60 hours on my reduction drive VW. I reworked the exhaust system over the winter and changed the tach for one that is much more accurate. With these changes I have the following to report. I'm getting 3400 RPM on takeoff at 50 MPH and at low cruise 3200 RPM at 75MPH. At full throttle I'm seeing app. 93 MPH at 3700 RPM. The MPH figures are all from GPS. It appears that the muffler that I had on my 4 into 1 exhaust system was very restrictive it is now without a muffler. The VW is now were I wanted it to be and no other changes will be done to it for the time being. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIII classic ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 10, 2003
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: VW Update
If you want a muffler, (?) there is a Supertrapp VW muffler on e-bay right now that if no one else bids up, I will get and see if I can adapt it to my Honda 500 Thumper. I currently have a Supertrapp on my Suzuki 650 single, and am very pleased, they are very simple to tune for whatever compromise you want between noise and power, it made a great improvement over the stock exhaust, and is only marginally louder, and then only at certain RPM's. Since you are a Kolber, it's OK if you want it more than me, let me know, and I won't bid against ya... It's at http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=33633&item =2414430685 Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > >I have app. 60 hours on my reduction drive VW. I reworked the exhaust system >over the winter and changed the tach for one that is much more accurate. >With these changes I have the following to report. I'm getting 3400 RPM on >takeoff at 50 MPH and at low cruise 3200 RPM at 75MPH. At full throttle I'm >seeing app. 93 MPH at 3700 RPM. The MPH figures are all from GPS. It appears >that the muffler that I had on my 4 into 1 exhaust system was very >restrictive it is now without a muffler. The VW is now were I wanted it to >be and no other changes will be done to it for the time being. > >Rick Neilsen >Redrive VW powered MKIII classic > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Bonsell" <ebonsell(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Original Firestar Ailerons
Date: May 11, 2003
Hi Friends, I'm rebuilding an 86 Firestar. The Ailerons are controlled by rods and bearings up through the cage and out the rear along the root tube. It was later changed to a tube that runs under the cage and up the back. Has anyone ever tried to take out the old control style and install the newer one? If it were possible it would leave more room inside the body for a larger fuel tank and parachute. Sincerely, Ed Bonsell ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 11, 2003
Subject: Re: Original Firestar Ailerons
From: ul15rhb(at)juno.com
Ed, You don't want to convert the old aileron control system on an Original Firestar to the new type. I've flown both types and the Original has more differential aileron control than the new ones and this is why it was designed that way. It almost eliminates adverse yaw. I believe the reason the company went to the other type was because it was too costly to weld those two bellcranks in place and there was a problem with the weld on the aft bellcrank breaking on a few. No need to be concerned about this as the ones that broke were with pilots doing aerobatics in them. The Original Firestars are more responsive than the new ones in roll with the full span ailerons. Ralph Original Firestar 16 years flying it writes: > > > Hi Friends, > > I'm rebuilding an 86 Firestar. The Ailerons are controlled by rods > and bearings up through the cage and out the rear along the root > tube. It was later changed to a tube that runs under the cage and up > the back. Has anyone ever tried to take out the old control > style and install the newer one? If it were possible it would > leave more room inside the body for a larger fuel tank and > parachute. > > Sincerely, > > Ed Bonsell The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 11, 2003
From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: firestar rear bellcrank
> Snip..... there was a problem with the weld on > the aft bellcrank breaking on a few. No need to be concerned about this as > the ones that broke were with pilots doing aerobatics in them.Ralph > Thanks for the heads up. I will take a very close look at mine even > though I don't do aerobatics. > Roger in Ashland, OR Ralph/Roger/Gang: Aerobatics probably did not break the weld on the aft aileron bell crank. A heavy hand and weak design is what broke it. The aft aileron bell crank pivots on a 1/4 inch bolt that is butt welded around its head to the main fuselage root tube. There are tremendous loads placed on the bolt with nothing to stabalize the free end. I remedied that problem by making a "Z" shaped 4130 strap brace pop riveted to the root tube at one end and drilled to accept the threaded end of the bolt at the other end. This worked for me. I had a heavy hand plus many many aerobatic maneuvers in the old Firestar that was DEFINITELY NOT DESIGNED FOR AEROBATICS. In the end, it nearly cost me my life, but not from a control failure. That has been 13 years ago. I learned a good lesson. Do not attempt to perform aerobatic maneuvers in an aircraft that is not designed for aerobatics. I haven't since then. john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: VW Update/Vamoose
Date: May 11, 2003
That's good news, Rick, and really gives me hope. I had Vamoose fired up last Thurs., and it lifted the tail at around 3000, and differential steering worked great at that setting. The Matco disc brakes held it solid. The engine sounds very smooth & strong. Wasn't tied down, so no more was possible, but it sure wanted to go. The potential looks very good. I brought it home - finally - last Thurs, but unfortunately Vamoose won't make it to Monument Valley - in, or out of, the trailer.................too many other things to do, and not enuf time. It IS fly-able now, but not legal yet, and still some detail work to do. (That "detail work" seems to be un-ending) See some of you at George Thompson's/Pelletier's in Paulsen, AZ next Sat., (got my hours changed) then the rest at M.V. on Sun. afternoon. I hope some of you carry hitch-hikers. John, you've got a choice between a regular folding chair, and a folding recliner. Hmmmm...........maybe I could put hidden springs in one of them ?? :-) No, I won't be bringing you that sody pop............sounds like others have that covered pretty good. Lar. Do not Archive. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Kolb Mk III - Vamoose N78LB www.gogittum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick & Martha Neilsen" <neilsenrm(at)comcast.net> Subject: Kolb-List: VW Update > > I have app. 60 hours on my reduction drive VW. I reworked the exhaust system > over the winter and changed the tach for one that is much more accurate. > With these changes I have the following to report. I'm getting 3400 RPM on > takeoff at 50 MPH and at low cruise 3200 RPM at 75MPH. At full throttle I'm > seeing app. 93 MPH at 3700 RPM. The MPH figures are all from GPS. It appears > that the muffler that I had on my 4 into 1 exhaust system was very > restrictive it is now without a muffler. The VW is now were I wanted it to > be and no other changes will be done to it for the time being. > > Rick Neilsen > Redrive VW powered MKIII classic > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net>
Subject: Re: Firefly Shoulderbelts
Date: May 11, 2003
what should the fuel burn be on a cuyuna II-02? > >============================================================== > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Steuber" <esteuber(at)rochester.rr.com>
Subject: Cuyuna fuel burn and Ultrastar ailerons
Date: May 12, 2003
The cuyuna Ul 202 can burn as little as 2 gallons an hour at a reduced power setting down to 4800 but a normal cruise setting of 5200 to 5400 is gonna get you 2.5 to 3. Now I need an answer to a question that I have been thinking about for some time and need the help of you aeronautical engineers , experts or amateurs ...... Here Goes ! I have an Ultrastar with the original full span ailerons that are also deep in chord and taper from wide at the butt rib out to the tip. They are original as per plans. My last Ultrastar had heavy ailerons but they were shortened like the newer Firestars by the previous owner before I purchased it. As it is now the problem is probably greater. I want to make these lighter in response but want to maintain the length for low speed lift .I have no flaperon system and will not be adding it. I will be adding vortex generators after covering but I doubt it will help as much as I need. SOOOOO... I have been thinking about the options and they seem to be .. 1.Goose Feet.....2 Servo tabs.....or 3 ( here's the question ) the extensions on the ends of the ailerons as some of the WW1 German aircraft had that went beyond the end of the wing and in front of the pivot point of the aileron. This design was for lightening the aileron response ( Right?) . Some modern day aircraft have this incorporated in the elevator system for the same reason I assume ( Agcat , AA-5 )... I have already decided to paint the new Ultrastar in WW1 colors with Iron Crosses so adding these aileron boosters would be relatively easy and adding some balance weight for flutter at the same time could be done. The reason these may have been used in the first place may have been as a flutter prevention but I am only guessing....... Is there a fomula to figure out how much area to add forward of the aileron hinge to get the desired result without getting dangerous.....I may even do the elevators strictly for "eye appeal" ....The" Homer bumps" on the ailerons and elevators have got to go ! All info and ideas welcome....... except junking the Ultrastar ! This Ultrastar is going to be one of a kind ...check the photo share for pics........changing as much as I already have is going to make for an interesting test flight.....getting to old for too much excitement....I will have to make sure I have a new box of "Depends" on hand..... Ed in Western NY Hey BB , when am I gonna see the new plane fly over ? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 12, 2003
From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Ultrastar Ailerons
I want to make these lighter in response but want to maintain the length for low speed lift . Ed in Western NY Morning Ed/Gang: I am strictly an amateur, shade tree at that. When I built my MK III I reduced the cord of the aileron and flap. My problem was I wanted less aileron but all the flap I could get and still stay in the same general area as designed. I forget how much I reduced the cord at the outboard end, but what I did was lay out the aileron and flap, reduce the cord at the outboard end, snapped a line to the standard inboard end. This took a pretty good chunk out of the aileron area and not so much out of my flaps. If I were to build and fly an Ultrastar, I would definitely cut the cord of the ailerons from inboard to outboard. Don't know how much at this time. It would be an experiment. Probably start by chopping 1/3 the cord across the span. Might even go to 1/2 cord. Again, for me, it would strictly be an experiment. I remember how stiff the original Ultrastar ailrons were. Anything over 35 mph and they were loaded up. The Ultrastar was the first airplane I had ever flown. I was used to flying helicopters. When I first took off I was surprised at how much lateral stick movement was required to maintain control and also how heavy lateral stick movement was. Helicopters require very little stick movement with little or no resistance. I flew my Ultrastar in the standard configuration and never experiemented with changing aileron configuration. Subject was changed to reflect content of post. john h ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 12, 2003
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Ultrastar ailerons
Don't know how much aileron travel you currently have, or how much you might be able to give away, but I felt my MKIII ailerons were excessively stiff, so shortened the control horn at the fuselage end to reduce throw and increase leverage. Was very pleased with the results. Any chance you could drill a couple sets of alternate holes in the fuselage end bellcrank (or add extensions to the aileron bellcranks?) make up a couple sets of alternate length pushrods, fly it and see what happens? It is a lot less drastic than modifying the ailerons because if gives a variety of options. I discovered that the MKIII ailerons with 1/3 less travel were still more than sufficient even in adverse conditions, and the control force is now very comfortable. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > > Now I need an answer to a question that I have been thinking > about for some time and need the help of you aeronautical engineers , > experts or amateurs ...... Here Goes ! > I have an Ultrastar with the original full span ailerons that are > also deep in chord and taper from wide at the butt rib out to the tip. > They are original as per plans. My last Ultrastar had heavy ailerons but > they were shortened like the newer Firestars by the previous owner before > I purchased it. As it is now the problem is probably greater. I want to > make these lighter in response but want to maintain the length for low > speed lift .I have no flaperon system and will not be adding it. I will > be adding vortex generators after covering but I doubt it will help as > much as I need. > SOOOOO... I have been thinking about the options and they seem > to be .. 1.Goose Feet.....2 Servo tabs.....or 3 ( here's the question ) > the extensions on the ends of the ailerons as some of the WW1 German > aircraft had that went beyond the end of the wing and in front of the > pivot point of the aileron. This design was for lightening the aileron > response ( Right?) . Some modern day aircraft have this incorporated in > the elevator system for the same reason I assume ( Agcat , AA-5 )... I > have already decided to paint the new Ultrastar in WW1 colors with Iron > Crosses so adding these aileron boosters would be relatively easy and > adding some balance weight for flutter at the same time could be done. > The reason these may have been used in the first place may have been as a > flutter prevention but I am only guessing....... Is there a fomula to > figure out how much area to add forward of the aileron hinge to get the > desired result without getting dangerous.....I may even do th! >e elevators strictly for "eye appeal" ....The" Homer bumps" on the >ailerons and elevators have got to go ! > All info and ideas welcome....... except junking the Ultrastar ! > This Ultrastar is going to be one of a kind ...check the > photo share for pics........changing as much as I already have is going > to make for an interesting test flight.....getting to old for too much > excitement....I will have to make sure I have a new box of "Depends" on > hand..... > > Ed in Western NY > Hey BB , when am I gonna see the new plane > fly over ? > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: test
Date: May 12, 2003
test ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Mk- 3 passenger CG point
Date: May 12, 2003
Mk-3 drivers, What figure did you all use for the pilot/passenger cg point when working your weight and balance sheets? I get 2.5 to 3 inches in front of the leading edge datum point, just want to check against what others measured. Denny Rowe ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 12, 2003
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Mk- 3 passenger CG point
Where ever your belly button is, that's your CG. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > >Mk-3 drivers, >What figure did you all use for the pilot/passenger cg point when working >your weight and balance sheets? >I get 2.5 to 3 inches in front of the leading edge datum point, just want >to check against what others measured. >Denny Rowe > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Re: Mk- 3 passenger CG point
Date: May 12, 2003
I measured 4" to my navel, and allowed the same for the passenger, but I've got different seats. My A&P worked it out 3 times, and came up with 3 different answers for W&B. Looks like I'll hafta use my new-found education and work it out for myself.....................after I get back from Monument Valley. Lar. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Kolb Mk III - Vamoose N78LB www.gogittum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net> Subject: Kolb-List: Mk- 3 passenger CG point > > Mk-3 drivers, > What figure did you all use for the pilot/passenger cg point when working your weight and balance sheets? > I get 2.5 to 3 inches in front of the leading edge datum point, just want to check against what others measured. > Denny Rowe > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 12, 2003
From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: MV/update/short visit
Tim and Craig: I will probably take you up on your offer. Will let you know when I will arrive as soon as I can determine, which will probably be a day or two out. Thanks again, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 12, 2003
From: Chuck Davis - Comcast <davis207(at)comcast.net>
Subject: zinc oxide
I was doing a little shopping in Aircraft Spruce. A spray can of Zinc Oxide primer is $6.80. However, the additional shipping due to a "hazardous item" is over $20. When I added a quart of tube seal (smallest size available) the shipping charges went up another 30+ USD. Can any one suggest some alternatives / alternative sources (local availability?) that are not so economically non-sensible? Chuck Davis ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Swiderski" <swiderski@advanced-connect.net>
Subject: Re: Ultrastar ailerons
Date: May 12, 2003
Ed, The spades and the extensions would certainly help to lighten the lateral force, but the trailing edge of the wing & the leading edge of the ailerons are only .028" which will not handle much of a load & those forces could get to be pretty strong. I was going to go that route myself but was advised by Dennis S not to. I did what Richard Pike suggested and I also went with flaperons which was a huge payoff for me. Richard Swiderski > > > > Now I need an answer to a question that I have been thinking > > about for some time and need the help of you aeronautical engineers , > > experts or amateurs ...... Here Goes ! > > I have an Ultrastar with the original full span ailerons that are > > also deep in chord and taper from wide at the butt rib out to the tip. > > They are original as per plans. My last Ultrastar had heavy ailerons but > > they were shortened like the newer Firestars by the previous owner before > > I purchased it. As it is now the problem is probably greater. I want to > > make these lighter in response but want to maintain the length for low > > speed lift .I have no flaperon system and will not be adding it. I will > > be adding vortex generators after covering but I doubt it will help as > > much as I need. > > SOOOOO... I have been thinking about the options and they seem > > to be .. 1.Goose Feet.....2 Servo tabs.....or 3 ( here's the question ) > > the extensions on the ends of the ailerons as some of the WW1 German > > aircraft had that went beyond the end of the wing and in front of the > > pivot point of the aileron. This design was for lightening the aileron > > response ( Right?) . Some modern day aircraft have this incorporated in > > the elevator system for the same reason I assume ( Agcat , AA-5 )... I > > have already decided to paint the new Ultrastar in WW1 colors with Iron > > Crosses so adding these aileron boosters would be relatively easy and > > adding some balance weight for flutter at the same time could be done. > > The reason these may have been used in the first place may have been as a > > flutter prevention but I am only guessing....... Is there a fomula to > > figure out how much area to add forward of the aileron hinge to get the > > desired result without getting dangerous.....I may even do th! > >e elevators strictly for "eye appeal" ....The" Homer bumps" on the > >ailerons and elevators have got to go ! > > All info and ideas welcome....... except junking the Ultrastar ! > > This Ultrastar is going to be one of a kind ...check the > > photo share for pics........changing as much as I already have is going > > to make for an interesting test flight.....getting to old for too much > > excitement....I will have to make sure I have a new box of "Depends" on > > hand..... > > > > Ed in Western NY > > Hey BB , when am I gonna see the new plane > > fly over ? > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net>
Subject: Re: Ultrastar ailerons
Date: May 13, 2003
As I just got my ultrastar about 4 weeks ago,, what is wrong with it as is? it flys great. am I missing something here? thanks ron in texas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Swiderski" <swiderski@advanced-connect.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Ultrastar ailerons <swiderski@advanced-connect.net> > > Ed, > > The spades and the extensions would certainly help to lighten the > lateral force, but the trailing edge of the wing & the leading edge of the > ailerons are only .028" which will not handle much of a load & those forces > could get to be pretty strong. I was going to go that route myself but was > advised by Dennis S not to. I did what Richard Pike suggested and I also > went with flaperons which was a huge payoff for me. > > Richard Swiderski > > > > > > > > Now I need an answer to a question that I have been thinking > > > about for some time and need the help of you aeronautical engineers , > > > experts or amateurs ...... Here Goes ! > > > I have an Ultrastar with the original full span ailerons that > are > > > also deep in chord and taper from wide at the butt rib out to the tip. > > > They are original as per plans. My last Ultrastar had heavy ailerons but > > > they were shortened like the newer Firestars by the previous owner > before > > > I purchased it. As it is now the problem is probably greater. I want to > > > make these lighter in response but want to maintain the length for low > > > speed lift .I have no flaperon system and will not be adding it. I will > > > be adding vortex generators after covering but I doubt it will help as > > > much as I need. > > > SOOOOO... I have been thinking about the options and they seem > > > to be .. 1.Goose Feet.....2 Servo tabs.....or 3 ( here's the question ) > > > the extensions on the ends of the ailerons as some of the WW1 German > > > aircraft had that went beyond the end of the wing and in front of the > > > pivot point of the aileron. This design was for lightening the aileron > > > response ( Right?) . Some modern day aircraft have this incorporated in > > > the elevator system for the same reason I assume ( Agcat , AA-5 )... I > > > have already decided to paint the new Ultrastar in WW1 colors with Iron > > > Crosses so adding these aileron boosters would be relatively easy and > > > adding some balance weight for flutter at the same time could be done. > > > The reason these may have been used in the first place may have been as > a > > > flutter prevention but I am only guessing....... Is there a fomula to > > > figure out how much area to add forward of the aileron hinge to get the > > > desired result without getting dangerous.....I may even do th! > > >e elevators strictly for "eye appeal" ....The" Homer bumps" on the > > >ailerons and elevators have got to go ! > > > All info and ideas welcome....... except junking the > Ultrastar ! > > > This Ultrastar is going to be one of a kind ...check the > > > photo share for pics........changing as much as I already have is going > > > to make for an interesting test flight.....getting to old for too much > > > excitement....I will have to make sure I have a new box of "Depends" on > > > hand..... > > > > > > Ed in Western NY > > > Hey BB , when am I gonna see the new plane > > > fly over ? > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 12, 2003
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: zinc oxide
I have found spray cans of Zinc Chromate primer in the local Army surplus store cheap. Tube seal is nothing more than boiled linseed oil. (Wonder how that's different from plain linseed oil?) Try Lowes, Home Depot, Ace Hardware, etc. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > >I was doing a little shopping in Aircraft Spruce. A spray can of Zinc Oxide >primer is $6.80. However, the additional shipping due to a "hazardous item" >is over $20. > > >When I added a quart of tube seal (smallest size available) the shipping >charges went up another 30+ USD. > > >Can any one suggest some alternatives / alternative sources (local >availability?) that are not so economically non-sensible? > > >Chuck Davis > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 12, 2003
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)airmail.net>
Subject: Re: zinc oxide
Sounds like there double dipping on the hazardous fee. What's interesting I've found it varies depending upon who your doing business with. Shouldn't be two charges for the same shipment. How much does FedEx Ground charge? I've found I can ship stuff for 1/2 to 2/3 the cost of what UPS charges and it gets there faster, St-Pete to Dallas in 2 days and the box looked like it was hardly touched. Kind of like what UPS used to be like, fast, and gentle. jerb > >I was doing a little shopping in Aircraft Spruce. A spray can of Zinc Oxide >primer is $6.80. However, the additional shipping due to a "hazardous item" >is over $20. > > >When I added a quart of tube seal (smallest size available) the shipping >charges went up another 30+ USD. > > >Can any one suggest some alternatives / alternative sources (local >availability?) that are not so economically non-sensible? > > >Chuck Davis > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: KolbTwinstar(at)aol.com
Date: May 13, 2003
Subject: Re: Kolb Twinstar For Sale
Due to cutbacks at my job I'm forced to sell my Kolb. Kolb aircraft N560TB New Rotax 503CDI with a new ground adjustable Warp Prop Paint (Poly Tone) is white with blue and black trim Fly's Great! Asking $10,950 I also have a 24ft. fully enclosed trailer with electric hoist I would sell with it if needed. Plus kolb accessories. Tracy Briggs 74 Gallop Lane Wentzville Mo. 63385 314-258-1061 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Steuber" <esteuber(at)rochester.rr.com>
Subject: What's wrong with an original Ultrastar?
Date: May 13, 2003
Ronnie, The original Ultrastar is a great machine as is....the original intentions for the design were met but with any good design there is always somebody that thinks he can make it better......My problem was created by myself after modifying the cage by streamlining it and putting in a center line stick. The Ultrastar was cruising at much higher cruise speeds and with normal Cuyuna power settings was going too fast for the aileron response that was very disturbing when a steep bank was initiated at these higher speeds. The Ultrastar would tend to stay in the bank or increase it even with opposite aileron. Top rudder was usually the way to get it level again but it just did not feel right to this old Agcat pilot. Usually when you change something on a homebuilt you create a chain reaction that you start chasing and sometimes never catch.....but I don't take my own advice and just go nuts... Richard...I really want to add the ends to the ailerons and incorporate the balance weights.... I was already thinking about a solution to the .028 tubes.....to err on the safe side I was thinking of replacing both with .049 and adding some angle to the bottom wing ribs (as per previous advice) for added compression strength to help the wing warp at higher cruise speeds. I am also adding the steel ring at the butt rib for the same reason.....I think I will also make the end hinge much longer to take the extra load at the wing tip.......more weight and no longer a true ultralight....the chain reaction keeps getting worse....now I gotta get it inspected cause it will be too heavy... AAARGH ! Ronnie... don't change a thing ! ! Just fly it and "be happy" . Tinkeritis Ed in Western NY ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "boyd young" <by0ung(at)brigham.net>
Subject: pilot cg
Date: May 13, 2003
Mk-3 drivers, What figure did you all use for the pilot/passenger cg point when working your weight and balance sheets? I get 2.5 to 3 inches in front of the leading edge datum point, just want to check against what others measured. Denny Rowe Denny when i weighed a couple months ago i weighed the plane empty then with me in it... subtracted out the diferences in the wheel weights and calculated -3 1/2 inches..... for what it is worth i do not have original seats.... but they are very close to the cg figures i had with the original. boyd ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Re: pilot cg
Date: May 13, 2003
Thanks Boyd, It looks like I am going with the 3 inch measurement for FAA inspection, if I use 2.5" my cg goes past 37% with emty tanks and my 185# butt in the seat. Using 3" I just make it inside the rear cg limit throughout my fuel range which is 0 - 60 pounds. This baby is going to be quite the hauler, with full fuel and myself, I have 280# of room under the max gross limit of 1000#. My foreward cg limit of 20% cord would require a 450# passenger with a belly button 12 inches in front of mine to reach. We should have plenty of elevator trim to handle passengers. One problem I have is that my co-owner Jay Swager only weighs 145# soaking wet, so I'll have to come up with some kind of removable ballast on the passenger side floor pan for Jay to fly solo. The 23rd is coming fast, I'm still trying to get all the i's dotted and t ' s crossed before inspector man gets here. Denny Mk-3 N616DR Leechburg PA ----- Original Message ----- From: boyd young To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com ; rowedl(at)highstream.net Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 10:23 AM Subject: pilot cg Mk-3 drivers, What figure did you all use for the pilot/passenger cg point when working your weight and balance sheets? I get 2.5 to 3 inches in front of the leading edge datum point, just want to check against what others measured. Denny Rowe Denny when i weighed a couple months ago i weighed the plane empty then with me in it... subtracted out the diferences in the wheel weights and calculated -3 1/2 inches..... for what it is worth i do not have original seats.... but they are very close to the cg figures i had with the original. boyd ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Terry" <tswartz(at)hydrosoft.net>
Subject: Re: pilot cg
Date: May 13, 2003
Denny, I weigh 165# and did the removable ballast thing when testing my plane. I fastened a small duffel bag in the nose, got some lead shot, packaged it in zip lock bags, 5 lbs per bag, put them in the duffel bag and zipped it shut. I was then able to remove 5 lbs at a time and test fly. I no longer use any ballast. Terry One problem I have is that my co-owner Jay Swager only weighs 145# soaking wet, so I'll have to come up with some kind of removable ballast on the passenger side floor pan for Jay to fly solo. The 23rd is coming fast, I'm still trying to get all the i's dotted and t ' s crossed before inspector man gets here. Denny ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DAquaNut(at)aol.com
Date: May 13, 2003
Subject: Re: Prop Spacer
Group, Im getting ready to order the 447 engine kit for my firefly now that I finally finnished building my enclosed trailer. Does the firefly come with a prop spacer or does it need one? I was at a flyin last weekend & there was a guy there with a firestar11 . He showed me the ding he had in the aileron tube. He said that he got the ding when the Ivo prop struck the tube just after start up. It looked like he had plenty of clearance. Is the Ivo more prone to this problem or is it a problem with all composite props? I just want to do all I can to keek this from happening to me Comments, Ed ( in Houston) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 13, 2003
From: Jack & Louise Hart <jbhart(at)ldd.net>
Subject: Re: Prop Spacer
> > > Group, > Im getting ready to order the 447 engine kit for my firefly now >that I finally finnished building my enclosed trailer. Does the firefly come >with a prop spacer or does it need one? I was at a flyin last weekend & >there was a guy there with a firestar11 . He showed me the ding he had in the >aileron tube. He said that he got the ding when the Ivo prop struck the tube >just after start up. It looked like he had plenty of clearance. Is the Ivo >more prone to this problem or is it a problem with all composite props? I >just want to do all I can to keek this from happening to me > > Comments, > Ed ( in Houston) > Ed, A prop spacer is a good idea. Mine came with the parts kit that included the IVO propeller too from the old Kolb Company. I assume the spacer was made by IVO. The best I remember is that IVO recommends a minimum of five inch clearance between the blade and the nearest part of the plane. It is easy to measure how close the propeller comes to the aileron tubes while flying. See: http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly83.html Good luck, Jack B. Hart FF004 Jackson, MO Jack & Louise Hart jbhart(at)ldd.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Bonsell" <ebonsell(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Original Firestar rear bellcrank
Date: May 13, 2003
.....there was a problem with the weld on the aft bellcrank breaking on a few...... Thanks for the responses Ralph and John, This also happened to a Firestar kept outside at the field I flew out of. It was surmised that the plane was left tied down for an unknown period of time without the stick tied down. The resulting whipping back and forth in the wind eventually broke the weld. I have seen my ailerons whip back and forth so I always tie the stick down when I'm not in it outside. A quick builder for the old Kolb Co. I know said they started sending out the little Z shaped fittings after a few bolts broke. Does anyone know the specs? I checked my bolt and there are no sign of cracks. I was never very heavy handed on the stick but as long as I'm rebuilding I might as well put one on. Sincerely, Ed Bonsell ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Swiderski" <swiderski@advanced-connect.net>
Subject: Re: Prop Spacer
Date: May 13, 2003
Ed, If Rotax just would come out of the Stone Age and put an advance curve in their ignition so we wouldn't have to start our engines at full advance, and watch our planes go through the shakes on every start, no one would need a spacer. But as it is, Ivo's are best used with a spacer. ...Richard Swiderski ----- Original Message ----- From: <DAquaNut(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Prop Spacer > > > Group, > Im getting ready to order the 447 engine kit for my firefly now > that I finally finnished building my enclosed trailer. Does the firefly come > with a prop spacer or does it need one? I was at a flyin last weekend & > there was a guy there with a firestar11 . He showed me the ding he had in the > aileron tube. He said that he got the ding when the Ivo prop struck the tube > just after start up. It looked like he had plenty of clearance. Is the Ivo > more prone to this problem or is it a problem with all composite props? I > just want to do all I can to keek this from happening to me > > Comments, > Ed ( in Houston) > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 13, 2003
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)airmail.net>
Subject: Re: Prop Spacer
When I got my FireFly kit back in 95, it was part of the engine/prop kit. Not sure what the new company includes. Dennis told me the spacer put the prop in cleaner air thus reducing the vibration and noise level as blades passed the trailing edge of the wing. jerb > > > > > > > Group, > > Im getting ready to order the 447 engine kit for my firefly now > >that I finally finnished building my enclosed trailer. Does the firefly > come > >with a prop spacer or does it need one? I was at a flyin last weekend & > >there was a guy there with a firestar11 . He showed me the ding he had > in the > >aileron tube. He said that he got the ding when the Ivo prop struck the > tube > >just after start up. It looked like he had plenty of clearance. Is the Ivo > >more prone to this problem or is it a problem with all composite props? I > >just want to do all I can to keek this from happening to me > > > > Comments, > > Ed ( in Houston) > > >Ed, > >A prop spacer is a good idea. Mine came with the parts kit that included >the IVO propeller too from the old Kolb Company. I assume the spacer was >made by IVO. The best I remember is that IVO recommends a minimum of five >inch clearance between the blade and the nearest part of the plane. > >It is easy to measure how close the propeller comes to the aileron tubes >while flying. See: > >http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly83.html > >Good luck, > >Jack B. Hart FF004 >Jackson, MO > > >Jack & Louise Hart >jbhart(at)ldd.net > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mhqqqqq(at)aol.com
Date: May 13, 2003
Subject: 582 for sale
I saw a few weeks ago Jim gerken has his 582 for sale, I know jim and if I needed a 582 I would jump on this and think more of it than a new one, this engine has been great for him and I know how much detail he put into taking care of it. anyone who needs a 582 should grab this one, it is better than new. mark twinstar minnesota ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "NBD" <mk3(at)bailinair.com>
Subject: Aero Vee 2002
Date: May 14, 2003
Has anyone looked at the Aero Vee 2002 engine as a possibility for use on the MKIII? http://www.aeroconversions.com Regards Noel Kolb MK III Classic New Hampshire http://www.bailinair.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Re: Aero Vee 2002
Date: May 14, 2003
Noel, The direct drive VW's are better suited for the faster planes like the Sonex. At Kolb speeds, you need a reduction on the VW's to get good performaance. Than they get a little on the heavy side, but we do have a few Mk-3 drivers here on the list with reductions on their VW's, some flying and at least one soon to be. Denny Rowe Mk-3, PA ----- Original Message ----- From: NBD <mk3(at)bailinair.com> Subject: Kolb-List: Aero Vee 2002 > > Has anyone looked at the Aero Vee 2002 engine as a possibility for use on > the MKIII? > > http://www.aeroconversions.com > > > Regards > Noel > Kolb MK III Classic > New Hampshire > http://www.bailinair.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 14, 2003
From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Great News!!
> > I sold the Buell today!!! Called Linda @ TNK and set up a visit for > 5/23/03. Plan to ride in the M3X and order kit 1. > > pp.... pp/Gang: Great! I feel your excitement. Good luck on your project. john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Steuber" <esteuber(at)rochester.rr.com>
Subject: spacers
Date: May 14, 2003
I have been thinking about installing a spacer on the 2SI powered Ultrastar but have not found a source....same bolt pattern as the 447 Rotax setup....anybody got a source ? Ed in Western NY ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 14, 2003
From: Jack & Louise Hart <jbhart(at)ldd.net>
Subject: Re: spacers
> >I have been thinking about installing a spacer on the 2SI powered Ultrastar but have not found a source....same bolt pattern as the 447 Rotax setup....anybody got a source ? > Ed in Western NY > Ed, TNK Company may be a good source for this information. Jack B. Hart FF004 Jackson, MO Jack & Louise Hart jbhart(at)ldd.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Airgriff2(at)aol.com
Date: May 14, 2003
Subject: Light Sport Aircraft catagory
Just a note. I was reading up on the details of the up and coming Sport Pilot & Light Sport Aircraft proposals and notice that an aircraft fitting into this catagory can only have a fixed or ground adjustable prop. Some builders may be considering in flight adjustable props and may want to look further into this before getting cought between a rock and a hard place. Started my 618 up after a rebuild by Tom Olenik. Will break it in tonite and be back in the air soon. Fly Safe Bob Griffin upstate NY ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 14, 2003
From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Monument Valley
Morning Kolbers: Sitting here in hauck's holler watching the raindrops fall. Do not know when I will be able to get out of here. Had planned on doing a leisurely flight by leaving today, but that is not going to happen. The worst weather is along my planned route of flight. I may be able to sneak out of here to the SW and take a more southernly route to get around it. Will just have to wait and see. I still have plenty time to get to MV by Monday or earlier. john h N101AB (My N number is for 101st Aviation Battalion, 101st Airborne Division (RVN) (1969-1970) Jump School, 101st Abn Div, Ft Campbell, KY, May 1958 Co D, 2d Abn BG, 187th Inf, 101st Abn Div, Mar 1958 - Apr 1960 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 14, 2003
From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: [Fwd: Monument Valley]
Hi Gang: The attached post got lost in the shuffle somewhere in cyber space. As soon as I resend it, the original will also come through. It was sent over an hour ago. Still sitting here watching the weather and waiting to get out of here tomorrow, or when weather permits. john h > Morning Kolbers: > > Sitting here in hauck's holler watching the > raindrops fall. Do not know when I will be able > to get out of here. Had planned on doing a > leisurely flight by leaving today, but that is not > going to happen. > > The worst weather is along my planned route of > flight. I may be able to sneak out of here to the > SW and take a more southernly route to get around > it. Will just have to wait and see. > > I still have plenty time to get to MV by Monday or > earlier. > > john h > N101AB (My N number is for 101st Aviation > Battalion, 101st Airborne Division (RVN) > (1969-1970) > Jump School, 101st Abn Div, Ft Campbell, KY, May > 1958 > Co D, 2d Abn BG, 187th Inf, 101st Abn Div, Mar > 1958 - Apr 1960 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "L. Ray Baker" <rbaker-@atlantic.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb-List Digest: 27 Msgs - 05/13/03
Date: May 14, 2003
From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net> Subject: Kolb-List: Re: pilot cg Denny, I have the same problem. I welded a 20 lb, 15b and 5 lb weights into one unit with a handle on top for ease of handling. I installed a short post, on the floor in front of the passenger seat, and secure it with a hitch pin thru a hole in the top of the post. Secure an quick and easy to remove or install. Check out the pictures at http://rbaker-.members.atlantic.net Folder Mark III 500-579, pictures 080_a575a ballast, 080_a575b ballast and 082-a575c Bubba (I had to call it something). L Ray Baker Gainesville, FL Mark III N629RB One problem I have is that my co-owner Jay Swager only weighs 145# soaking wet, so I'll have to come up with some kind of removable ballast on the passenger side floor pan for Jay to fly solo. The 23rd is coming fast, I'm still trying to get all the i's dotted and t ' s crossed before inspector man gets here. Denny Mk-3 N616DR Leechburg PA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Petty" <ppetty@c-gate.net>
Subject: Re: Monument Valley
Date: May 14, 2003
John, If you need a field to duck into where right on the way ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com> Subject: Kolb-List: Monument Valley > > Morning Kolbers: > > Sitting here in hauck's holler watching the > raindrops fall. Do not know when I will be able > to get out of here. Had planned on doing a > leisurely flight by leaving today, but that is not > going to happen. > > The worst weather is along my planned route of > flight. I may be able to sneak out of here to the > SW and take a more southernly route to get around > it. Will just have to wait and see. > > I still have plenty time to get to MV by Monday or > earlier. > > john h > N101AB (My N number is for 101st Aviation > Battalion, 101st Airborne Division (RVN) > (1969-1970) > Jump School, 101st Abn Div, Ft Campbell, KY, May > 1958 > Co D, 2d Abn BG, 187th Inf, 101st Abn Div, Mar > 1958 - Apr 1960 > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 14, 2003
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Oil line bubble
Got a question: after a career of Rotax premix, I flew today with the new 582 with oil injection (a first) and there is a recurring problem. The oil line keeps presenting an air bubble about as big as a pea right at the point where the oil line hose connects to the oil pump. As soon as you start the engine, it goes away, but when you shut down, after a couple minutes it comes back. I greatly dislike this. Is it normal? If not, how to make it go away and stay away? Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 14, 2003
From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Oil line bubble
> I greatly dislike this. Is it normal? If not, how to > make it go away and stay away? > > Richard Pike Richard/Gents: I seem to remember Ronnie Smith, South Mississippi Light Aircraft, telling me to solve the problem and insure the pump is cleared out by running the engine about 3,000 or so rpm while manually pushing the arm on the oil pump to the full rich position and holding it there for a while. I may be wrong, so give Ronnie a call and confirm the correct method to solving the problem. john h PS: Hope to bust out of Gantt International Airport in the morning, weather permitting. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 14, 2003
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Oil line bubble
Thanks for the quick response. I already tried that - and it came back. That's why I don't like it, it really ought to be gone by now... Have fun out there & be careful. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > > > > I greatly dislike this. Is it normal? If not, how to > > make it go away and stay away? > > > > Richard Pike > >Richard/Gents: > >I seem to remember Ronnie Smith, South Mississippi >Light Aircraft, telling me to solve the problem >and insure the pump is cleared out by running the >engine about 3,000 or so rpm while manually >pushing the arm on the oil pump to the full rich >position and holding it there for a while. > >I may be wrong, so give Ronnie a call and confirm >the correct method to solving the problem. > >john h > >PS: Hope to bust out of Gantt International >Airport in the morning, weather permitting. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Guy Swenson" <guys(at)rrt.net>
Subject: Re: pilot cg
Date: May 14, 2003
Denny , I have the original sling seats in my Xtra with the 2in upholstery and have a pilot / passenger cg figure of -7.125. and I believe the 20% forward cg is a typo and should be 25%. Are you measuring the pilot cg with the wing set at 9 degrees? I will send you my weight and balance sheet off list. Guy S. MK III Xtra 60 hrs > Mk-3 drivers, > What figure did you all use for the pilot/passenger cg point when working your > weight and balance sheets? > I get 2.5 to 3 inches in front of the leading edge datum point, just want to check > against what others measured. >Rowe ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Re: pilot cg
Date: May 15, 2003
Guy, Wow, if thats a typo, I am really going to have to recheck some of my figures. A friend at work set me up a sweet spreadsheet at yesterday using Excel and man does it make things easy, I can't wait to check yours out too. Well, maybe some other Mk-3 drivers can fill us in on the CG range in their manuals. Again my kit is a 1992 model year and the CG page I am using is page 43 in the Mk-3 drawing manual copyright 1990, Rev 0. It calls out the range to be greater than 20% and less than 37% of the wing cord. Denny ----- Original Message ----- From: Guy Swenson <guys(at)rrt.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: pilot cg > > Denny , > I have the original sling seats in my Xtra with the 2in upholstery and have > a pilot / passenger cg figure of -7.125. and I believe the 20% forward cg is > a typo and should be 25%. Are you measuring the pilot cg with the wing set > at 9 degrees? I will send you my weight and balance sheet off list. > > Guy S. > MK III Xtra > 60 hrs > > > Mk-3 drivers, > > What figure did you all use for the pilot/passenger cg point when working > your > > weight and balance sheets? > > I get 2.5 to 3 inches in front of the leading edge datum point, just want > to check > > against what others measured. > >Rowe > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb-List Digest: 27 Msgs - 05/13/03
Date: May 15, 2003
Ray, Thanks for the info, I think I'll do something real similar to what you have. Question: What CG range does your Mk-3 manual call out? And what date is your manual? Denny ----- Original Message ----- From: L. Ray Baker <rbaker-@atlantic.net> Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb-List Digest: 27 Msgs - 05/13/03 > > > From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net> > Subject: Kolb-List: Re: pilot cg > > > Denny, > > I have the same problem. I welded a 20 lb, 15b and 5 lb weights into one > unit with a handle on top for ease of handling. I installed a short post, > on the floor in front of the passenger seat, and secure it with a hitch pin > thru a hole in the top of the post. Secure an quick and easy to remove or > install. > > Check out the pictures at http://rbaker-.members.atlantic.net Folder Mark > III 500-579, pictures 080_a575a ballast, > 080_a575b ballast and 082-a575c Bubba (I had to call it something). > > L Ray Baker > Gainesville, FL > Mark III N629RB > > One problem I have is that my co-owner Jay Swager only weighs 145# soaking > wet, > so I'll have to come up with some kind of removable ballast on the passenger > side floor pan for Jay to fly solo. > The 23rd is coming fast, I'm still trying to get all the i's dotted and t ' > s crossed > before inspector man gets here. > > Denny > Mk-3 N616DR Leechburg PA > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Cavuontop(at)aol.com
Date: May 15, 2003
Subject: Re: Oil line bubble
In a message dated 5/14/2003 10:28:00 PM Eastern Standard Time, rwpike(at)charter.net writes: > The oil > line keeps presenting an air bubble about as big as a pea right at the > point where the oil line hose connects to the oil pump. As soon as you > start the engine, it goes away, but when you shut down, after a couple > minutes it comes back. I greatly dislike this. Is it normal? If not, how to > > make it go away and stay away? > Brother Pike: The solution to your problem is to get an opaque hose. Use the new style coated fabric wrapped hose from Rotax which is far superior to the older style woven hose. I think the only bubbles that matter are the ones on the upstream side of the pump. There is a procedure for bleeding the pump in the repair manual. Mark R. Sellers Kolb Twinstar Mark III, N496BM ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 15, 2003
From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Monument Valley
Morning Ron/Gang: Thanks for the lunch invite. Hope I don't get that far south on my way out though. Plan on coming back through FHU on the way home. Weather does not look good from here to Albuquerque today or tomorrow. I am hoping to get out today, but don't want to get caught up in this adverse weather. I really do not have many options to circumvent to the south or north. Will play it cool for a while and see what happens. I have to wait out one system of thunderstorms to come through before I can get out of my airstrip. Trying to wait patiently, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb-List Digest: 25 Msgs - 05/14/03
Date: May 15, 2003
Boyd, You are correct, however it will be a while longer before you can lay hands on one. The Joint venture by Honda motors and Teledyne Continental revolves around a 4 cylinder opposed , dual overhead camshaft, electronicly fuel injected aircraft engine of the 150 hp class specifically designed for the military UAV (drone) contracts that are being prolifically offered currently. These contracts offer a significantly larger volume initally than the entire light plane market does and have attracted the attention of many engine manufacturers. Also of interest is that the "other than USA" world market for an aircraft engine of this category will likely be addressed first as the inherent cost of FAA approval in the USA vs cost recovery time period at current market volume levels is unattractive. I would bet a buck, that if the military contracts are lost to another competitor....that project will vanish unless SEVERAL major OEMS outside the USA express interest for substantial volume! Don Gherardini Sales / Engineering dept. American Honda Engines Power Equipment Company 800-626-7326 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 15, 2003
From: woody <duesouth(at)govital.net>
Subject: Re: zinc oxide
I tried to send some wing ribs to Lar once. It was going to cost $25 for shipping and $90 for special handling as it was longer than a normal box. Old Lar could not afford my offer of free ribs. PS... Hey Lar I have a couple ideas for Vamouse but untill I get the scanner and printer working I can't get them back to you. I didn't forget ya. > >I was doing a little shopping in Aircraft Spruce. A spray can of Zinc Oxide >primer is $6.80. However, the additional shipping due to a "hazardous item" >is over $20. > > >When I added a quart of tube seal (smallest size available) the shipping >charges went up another 30+ USD. > > >Can any one suggest some alternatives / alternative sources (local >availability?) that are not so economically non-sensible? > > >Chuck Davis > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 15, 2003
From: woody <duesouth(at)govital.net>
Subject: Re: Prop Spacer
> > > > > > Group, > > Im getting ready to order the 447 engine kit for my firefly now > > that I finally finnished building my enclosed trailer. Does the firefly >come > > with a prop spacer or does it need one? I am not just a rude and crude builder , I am also cheap. I moved the whole engine back 2 inches. This saved me a couple hundred for the prop spacer and did not affect the cg much. Thats what I did anyway. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Re: zinc oxide
Date: May 15, 2003
Well, tarnation - get 'em going. I don't got nothing to take to M.V. with me. Those wing ribs are long ago taken care of...................but I'll accept some BBQ ribs in August. Lar. Do not Archive. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Kolb Mk III - Vamoose N78LB www.gogittum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "woody" <duesouth(at)govital.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: zinc oxide > > > I tried to send some wing ribs to Lar once. It was going to cost $25 for > shipping and $90 for special handling as it was longer than a normal box. > Old Lar could not afford my offer of free ribs. > > PS... Hey Lar I have a couple ideas for Vamouse but untill I get the > scanner and printer working I can't get them back to you. I didn't forget ya. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Doug Wetzel <dougwe(at)wrq.com>
Subject: Conversion
Date: May 16, 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Can anyone write a brief description (summary is fine) of what's involved in converting a MKIII from a 582 to a 912? Thanks! Doug Wetzel Seattle, WA -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQA/AwUBPsUIK3OHrG41gAgoEQLHvQCgl3KviwDtPFJLU9oGtS5UC/WKqwwAn3Lt iUVb+Jv2rIFVGiyYJagL9FBK =RPPx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Cavuontop(at)aol.com
Date: May 16, 2003
Subject: Re: Conversion
In a message dated 5/16/2003 11:51:34 AM Eastern Standard Time, dougwe(at)wrq.com writes: > Can anyone write a brief description (summary is fine) of what's > involved in converting > a MKIII from a 582 to a 912? Money. Mark R. Sellers Kolb Twinstar Mark III, N496BM ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Frank Reynen" <frank_reynen(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Conversion
Date: May 16, 2003
Doug; I did this conversion 3 years ago and several additional changes are required. You need a new prop as it now turns in the opposite direction and can be increased to 72".Use a 21/2" spacer. The throttle is also reversed action and requires changing. You need new mounting supports (2X2X1/4 angle) You can use the same Lord mount positions on the MKIII frame but you need to increase the size of the units to 200# size The radiator is separately mounted. You need a new oil cooler and a place for the big oil sump. There are additional things you can do but look up my WebPages www.webcom.com/reynen under tech info page for additional tips on reverse mounted carbs Frank Reynen MKIII ser#022 Lotus floats @735 hrs ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Wetzel" <dougwe(at)wrq.com> Subject: Kolb-List: Conversion > > > Can anyone write a brief description (summary is fine) of what's > involved in converting > a MKIII from a 582 to a 912? > > Thanks! > > Doug Wetzel > Seattle, WA > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 16, 2003
From: Jack & Louise Hart <jbhart(at)ldd.net>
Subject: IVO Propeller Blade Cutting Fixture
I puzzled over how to do this in a simple way so that one would not have to re balance the propeller. My cutting fixture can be seen at: http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly94.html It seems to work well and is inexpensive. Jack B. Hart FF004 Jackson, MO Jack & Louise Hart jbhart(at)ldd.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 16, 2003
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)airmail.net>
Subject: Re: Prop Spacer
Why is the spacer costing you that much, ours came with the engine/prop kit or are you short cutting here. jerb > > > > > > > > > > > > Group, > > > Im getting ready to order the 447 engine kit for my firefly now > > > that I finally finnished building my enclosed trailer. Does the firefly > >come > > > with a prop spacer or does it need one? > > > I am not just a rude and crude builder , I am also cheap. I moved >the whole engine back 2 inches. This saved me a couple hundred for the >prop spacer and did not affect the cg much. Thats what I did anyway. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Hauck Flight
Date: May 16, 2003
Got a call from John H. this morning. He was forced down on a small field south of Ardmore, OK., by high winds, and was hoping to continue on this afternoon. He says the weather's great, aside from the pesky wind. See ya day after tomorrow, John. Lar. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Kolb Mk III - Vamoose N78LB www.gogittum.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Kolb-List Digest: 9 Msgs - 05/16/03
Date: May 17, 2003
From: "Souza, Mark W" <mark.w.souza(at)boeing.com>
I will not be at my desk Monday 5/19/03. l will return Tuesday. Any issues that can't wait that long should be addressed to my back-up Dave Wellman 342-5112. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "S Ferkey" <sferkey(at)charter.net>
Subject: Firestar II For Sale
Date: May 17, 2003
Hi fellow Kolbers !!! Just wanted to let you know that my brother has one of his factory quickbuild Firestar II' s for sale on ebay. If anyone has any questions you may conntact me and I will get you an answer ASAP. Thanks !!! Sheldon ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Hugh" <hmhumes(at)attbi.com>
Subject: Re: Firestar II For Sale
Date: May 17, 2003
Here it is. http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=26428&item=2415688116 ----- Original Message ----- From: "S Ferkey" <sferkey(at)charter.net> Subject: Kolb-List: Firestar II For Sale > > Hi fellow Kolbers !!! Just wanted to let you know that my brother has one of his factory quickbuild Firestar II' s for sale on ebay. If anyone has any questions you may conntact me and I will get you an answer ASAP. Thanks !!! > > Sheldon > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 17, 2003
From: woody <duesouth(at)govital.net>
Subject: Re: Prop Spacer
> >Why is the spacer costing you that much, ours came with the engine/prop kit >or are you short cutting here. >jerb I never bought one but I thought I had heard that was the going price which is why I never tried to buy one. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Re: Prop Spacer
Date: May 17, 2003
Woody, I use an IVO spacer on my 503 powered Loehle, it does not have a centering boss on it but with a 66"- 34" Ritz wood blade it works great. I think it was less than $50 when I bought it, you would have to check their current price as this was years ago. Denny Mk-3 N616DR ----- Original Message ----- From: woody <duesouth(at)govital.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Prop Spacer > > > > >Why is the spacer costing you that much, ours came with the engine/prop kit > >or are you short cutting here. > >jerb > > > I never bought one but I thought I had heard that was the going price > which is why I never tried to buy one. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: compass corrections and checklists
Date: May 18, 2003
Kolbers, I need to fill out my compass correction card, as I do not have a compass rose in my yard, I was wondering how all of you swung your compass to check for correction. Also, anyone who has passed the airworthiness inspection and has all the checklists available for easy posting, I would sure like to check them out to make sure I haven't forgotten somthing. I guess I'll also check the archives for this We had a visit from Will Uribe Saturday, he is even nicer in person, and what a photographer! A true ambassador of light aviation. Still raining in South Wet Pennsylvania. Denny Rowe Mk-3 N616DR ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Fw: Sports Pilot
Date: May 18, 2003
A good friend from Georgia sent me this, I thought you folks might like to see it. Denny ----- Original Message ----- From: CJR41170(at)aol.com ; gtswift(at)wideopenwest.com ; gtalley(at)gsu.edu Subject: Sports Pilot 05/07/03 - FAA To Open Light-Sport Aircraft Operations Program Office The FAA announced this week that funding has been approved to establish a Light-Sport Aircraft (LSA) Operations Program Office for implementing the pending sport pilot/light-sport aircraft final rule. The office will be set up as a branch within the Regulatory Support Division in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. When the final rule is announced (FAA's goal is to do so at EAA AirVenture Oshkosh 2003), it will initially require the FAA to certificate an existing fleet of an estimated 10,000-plus uncertificated aircraft and airman using a standardized methodology. The LSA office will provide the policy guidance and infrastructure for both industry and FAA field offices; program oversight; and continued standardization of this program, from the effective date of the light sport aircraft rule and into the foreseeable future. "We have gotten approval to start setting up this operation and we are looking at the best ways of doing that," said Joseph Tintara, Manager of the Regulatory Support Division, Aeronautical Center, Oklahoma City. "We intend to meet with the industry people and their FAA counterparts to make sure it's successful. Tintara described it as proactive preparation. "A lot of this right now is getting ourselves prepared with the intent that the rule will be put out sometime in July," he said. "We want to be prepared when the rule rolls out." FAA estimates that 10,000 existing non-registered ultralight vehicles and an equivalent number of noncertificated ultralight pilots will transition into the light-sport category, be issued sport pilot certificates, and have their aircraft issued airworthiness certificates. Included in this number is an estimated 1,300 ultralight instructors who will transition under this new set of regulations and receive a flight instructor certificate with a sport pilot rating. Over the next 10 years the FAA expects a large number (12,000) of new pilots to seek sport pilot certificates and purchase new light-sport aircraft. This will be in addition to the many private pilots that left flying for financial or other reasons who will re-enter general aviation as a result of the new rule. The new set of regulations is also expected to generate an additional 9,000 repairman over the course of the next 10 years in addition to 9,000 people who will apply for certification in the first three years. Sport pilot/light sport aircraft rulemaking action was intended to establish programs that will not place an additional workload on the inspector workforce at the Flight Standards and Manufacturing District office level by delegating some additional functions to the light-sport industry organizations and establishing a program office. A program office will provide oversight, policy development, and implementation support. Here is a high-level overview of the Light-Sport Aircraft Operations Program Office responsibilities: Implementation and continued update of policy and advisory materials required for sport pilot/light-sport aircraft rule Provide overall support and oversight for the light-sport process Provide support and continue partnerships with light sport industry organizations Develop and provide for designee training (DPE/DAR) Develop and maintain Pilot Practical Test Standards and knowledge test item banks Accept/Approve and monitor industry training for sport pilots, sport pilot CFI's, and light-sport repairman Provide a data repository for light-sport information "We think we really have a good chance to be successful," Tintara said. "There is a lot of energy on the industry side as well as on the FAA side. Want to have some preliminary meetings to lay out a reasonable plan of attack." ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "vincenicely" <vincenicely(at)chartertn.net>
Subject: Re: compass corrections and checklists
Date: May 18, 2003
Denny, If you are asking about being prepared for the DAR's inspection, you may find the checklist for inspection near the end of AC90-89A of value as a guide to what the DAR will look at on your aircraft. This checklist is for an annual inspection and should cover many of the points you need to consider. However, if you are asking about checklists for flying, I have a Firestar and mine would not be what you need for a mk III. You can get a copy of the circular at: http://av-info.faa.gov/dst/amateur/ac90-89a.pdf The inspection checklist starts on page 86 of the pdf document that downloads. There is another circular that has all the information on the paperwork required. If you do not have that reference, I can look it up for you also. There is a lot of information referenced on: http://av-info.faa.gov/dst/amateur/ in case you have not found this site. I have used the airport compass rsoe to make my compass correction card. In two inspections of new aircraft, I have not had a DAR ask about the compass correction. Vince Nicely Firestar II N8233G ----- Original Message ----- From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net> Subject: Kolb-List: compass corrections and checklists > > Kolbers, > I need to fill out my compass correction card, as I do not have a compass rose in my yard, I was wondering how all of you swung your compass to check for correction. > Also, anyone who has passed the airworthiness inspection and has all the checklists available for easy posting, I would sure like to check them out to make sure I haven't forgotten somthing. I guess I'll also check the archives for this > We had a visit from Will Uribe Saturday, he is even nicer in person, and what a photographer! A true ambassador of light aviation. > Still raining in South Wet Pennsylvania. > Denny Rowe > Mk-3 N616DR > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Re: compass corrections and checklists
Date: May 18, 2003
Vince, Others, The checklists I was refering to were the ones for flying, preflight, pretake-off, pre- landing, shut down, whatever others people are using. I do have 90-89c,and a good case of the pre inspection jitters. This has been a long time coming and the coming week is shaping up to be a sleepless one. Nerves + midnight shift + full plate = silly posts from Denny. :-( Bear with me folks. Denny Rowe Mk-3 N616DR ----- Original Message ----- From: vincenicely <vincenicely(at)chartertn.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: compass corrections and checklists > > Denny, > > If you are asking about being prepared for the DAR's inspection, you may > find the checklist for inspection near the end of AC90-89A of value as a > guide to what the DAR will look at on your aircraft. This checklist is for > an annual inspection and should cover many of the points you need to > consider. However, if you are asking about checklists for flying, I have a > Firestar and mine would not be what you need for a mk III. You can get a > copy of the circular at: > > http://av-info.faa.gov/dst/amateur/ac90-89a.pdf > > The inspection checklist starts on page 86 of the pdf document that > downloads. > > There is another circular that has all the information on the paperwork > required. If you do not have that reference, I can look it up for you also. > > There is a lot of information referenced on: > > http://av-info.faa.gov/dst/amateur/ > > in case you have not found this site. > > I have used the airport compass rsoe to make my compass correction card. In > two inspections of new aircraft, I have not had a DAR ask about the compass > correction. > > Vince Nicely > Firestar II N8233G > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net> > To: "kolblist" > Subject: Kolb-List: compass corrections and checklists > > > > > > Kolbers, > > I need to fill out my compass correction card, as I do not have a compass > rose in my yard, I was wondering how all of you swung your compass to check > for correction. > > Also, anyone who has passed the airworthiness inspection and has all the > checklists available for easy posting, I would sure like to check them out > to make sure I haven't forgotten somthing. I guess I'll also check the > archives for this > > We had a visit from Will Uribe Saturday, he is even nicer in person, and > what a photographer! A true ambassador of light aviation. > > Still raining in South Wet Pennsylvania. > > Denny Rowe > > Mk-3 N616DR > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 18, 2003
From: John Raeburn <raeburn(at)snowhill.com>
Subject: Door "openers"
I have a Kolb Mk III (Classic). What ideas has anyone come up with to hold the clamshell doors open when it is on the ground. Usually when I am taxiing or leave the doors open to cool off the aircraft, a gust of wind invariably sends the doors crashing down. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Hugh" <hmhumes(at)attbi.com>
Subject: Re: Door "openers"
Date: May 18, 2003
Hello John. Here's a link to Big Lar's gullwing doors webpage. The photos don't really do the installation justice (Sorry Lar) but I can tell you first hand that they are slick. http://www.biglar.homestead.com/GULLWINGS.html Lar is on the way to Monument Valley with the rest of the lucky group getting together there for the next week or so. I'm sure he'll have a suggestion or two for you when he returns. Hugh ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Raeburn" <raeburn(at)snowhill.com> Subject: Kolb-List: Door "openers" > > I have a Kolb Mk III (Classic). What ideas has anyone come up with to hold > the clamshell doors open when it is on the ground. > Usually when I am taxiing or leave the doors open to cool off the aircraft, > a gust of wind invariably sends the doors crashing down. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrel(at)kfalls.net>
Subject: EIS
Date: May 18, 2003
I have a eis that I was attempting to reset the alarm parameters on. I did such a great job that it no longer shows rpm's. I don't have much documentation. Has anyone had any experience screwing these things up, that could give a hapless gage watcher some advice about how to straighten this up?????? confused in Klamath larry ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Re: EIS
Date: May 19, 2003
Larry, You have to set the PR (pulse per revolution) setting to 6 if you have a Rotax 2 stroke and the EIS with the single sub D connector. If you have a 912, or the old two connector EIS you are on your own. Give Grand Rapids a call if you can't get it, they will straighten you right out and will probably send you all the tech info for your unit. Denny ----- Original Message ----- From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrel(at)kfalls.net> Subject: Kolb-List: EIS > > I have a eis that I was attempting to reset the alarm parameters on. I did > such a great job that it no longer shows rpm's. I don't have much > documentation. Has anyone had any experience screwing these things up, that > could give a hapless gage watcher some advice about how to straighten this > up?????? > confused in Klamath > larry > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 19, 2003
From: Rick & Martha Neilsen <neilsenrm(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Door "openers"
I have a rather simple solution that I have pictured on my web site that has worked well on my stock MKIII doors for a few years. The door props are made out of two pieces of left over 5/16 aluminum tubing and small .5 x 1 inch al. sheet stock. The hinges are pop rivets and the sheet al. is attached to keep the arms from going over center too far so that they hold the door open. They cost nothing as they are made from left over Kolb parts, they can't weigh more than an ounce for both and they work. I can taxi and they will stay open as long as I don't go over too rough a ground. Some sort of open lock would be fairly easy to add but for me it isn't necessary. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIII -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of John Raeburn Subject: Kolb-List: Door "openers" I have a Kolb Mk III (Classic). What ideas has anyone come up with to hold the clamshell doors open when it is on the ground. Usually when I am taxiing or leave the doors open to cool off the aircraft, a gust of wind invariably sends the doors crashing down. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ian Heritch" <iheritch(at)satx.rr.com>
Subject: Re: EIS
Date: May 19, 2003
Larry, call the EIS folks, I found them to be very pleasant and eager to help solve problems. They remind me of Jim & Dondi. Grand Rapids Technologies, Inc. 889 76th St SW #2 Byron Center, MI 49315 616 583-8000 fax 616 583-8000 www.GRTavionics.com email : sales(at)grtavionics.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrel(at)kfalls.net> Subject: Kolb-List: EIS > > I have a eis that I was attempting to reset the alarm parameters on. I did > such a great job that it no longer shows rpm's. I don't have much > documentation. Has anyone had any experience screwing these things up, that > could give a hapless gage watcher some advice about how to straighten this > up?????? > confused in Klamath > larry > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: Door "openers"
Date: May 19, 2003
Rick....how bout a link to your website!!! I'd like to look at those. Don Gherardini Sales / Engineering dept. American Honda Engines Power Equipment Company 800-626-7326 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 19, 2003
From: "Mike Pierzina" <planecrazzzy(at)lycos.com>
Subject: Prop Spacer
Hey Guys, I just bought the 2 1/2" spacer from IVO , it was $80....It comes with the replacement bolts too .They also have the Spinners that fit their NEW style pitch adjuster hubs.....for only $30 I also ordered a EIS from Grand Rapids w/ALT & VSI and 12 ft cable.....there's $685 I tried to order a GPL starter but they didn't answer.....TOO LATE (Florida) That will be a QUICK thousand....... it's a good thing I've been working alot of overtime. Anybody know where I can buy Koltz KL-216 synthetic oil in Minnesota ? I tried searching the archives concerning the problem that was talked about the exhaust brackets that were cracking....( NO LUCK ).did you guys replace them with stainless steel ? I'm not going to pay over $200 for a oil injection tank....I'll make something or adapt something.....any ideas ??? Gotta Fly... Mike in MN , Final assembly, FSII,503 injected w/B, 3-66" IVO --- Sometimes you just have to take the leap and build your wings on the way down... Gotta Fly... Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 19, 2003
From: Rick & Martha Neilsen <neilsenrm(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Door "openers"
The link to my web site is http://www.geocities.com/NeilsenRM/kolb-MKIII.htm the link is also on the Kolb web site in the builders web site page. -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Don Gherardini Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Door "openers" Rick....how bout a link to your website!!! I'd like to look at those. Don Gherardini Sales / Engineering dept. American Honda Engines Power Equipment Company 800-626-7326 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 19, 2003
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)airmail.net>
Subject: Oil Injection Tank
Below is a copy of a prior post by Jerry Pridemore regarding what he found and used for an oil injection tank. jerb I was wandering around the "PEP Boys auto parts store yesterday, and noticed an aftermarket Radiator overflow/ wiper-washer reservoir, that looks amazingly like the one sold by Lockwood, LEAf, for 22.00, as an oil injection tank, similar right down to the bracket. 2-3/4 quarts 9.99. Jerry Pridemore prdmr@lou-telecom.net > > Hey Guys, > I just bought the 2 1/2" spacer from IVO , it was > $80....It comes with the replacement bolts too .They also have the > Spinners that fit their NEW style pitch adjuster hubs.....for only $30 > > I also ordered a EIS from Grand Rapids w/ALT & VSI and 12 ft > cable.....there's $685 > > I tried to order a GPL starter but they didn't answer.....TOO LATE > (Florida) > > That will be a QUICK thousand....... it's a good thing I've been > working alot of overtime. > > Anybody know where I can buy Koltz KL-216 synthetic oil in Minnesota ? > > I tried searching the archives concerning the problem that was talked > about the exhaust brackets that were cracking....( NO LUCK ).did you guys > replace them with stainless steel ? > > I'm not going to pay over $200 for a oil injection tank....I'll make > something or adapt something.....any ideas ??? > Gotta Fly... > Mike in MN , Final assembly, FSII,503 > injected w/B, 3-66" IVO >--- >Sometimes you just have to take the leap >and build your wings on the way down... > Gotta Fly... > > >Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail! > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrel(at)kfalls.net>
Subject: eis
Date: May 19, 2003
Thanks to all for the advice on the eis. Living on the west coast, I didn't get a chance to call them today, will do so tomorrow. I am beginning to wonder if something might be wrong with it after all. The hour meter isn't working either, and I cannot get it past the screen that resets the defaults. Or at least I can't get it to the screen that sets the pulse rate. Regarding cabin heat. has anyone used a "heater core" from a car to supply heat to a Mark III? At first glance it seems to be possible. Either a 12 volt fan or a bit of ducting from the front. Any thoughts? Larry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 20, 2003
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: eis
> > Regarding cabin heat. has anyone used a "heater core" from a car to >supply heat to a Mark III? At first glance it seems to be possible. Either a >12 volt fan or a bit of ducting from the front. Any thoughts? >Larry Motorcycle radiator & 2 plastic 12V computer fans, works great. Check it out at http://www.bcchapel.org/pages/0003/kolb.htm Look under "Adding A Heater" If you decide to add a heater, let me know before you start to plumb it, because I have since found out a bit about plumbing that really helps make the cooling work better, and it is not yet on the web page. Just got my airplane back in the air last week after 5 months worth of mods, and on Saturday I had a batch of bad epoxy dissolve and it was part of the gas tank mod... Kind'a messy. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrel(at)kfalls.net>
Subject: Re: EIS
Date: May 20, 2003
Well I talked to the lady at Grand Rapids today, unfortunately I was at work rather than at the plane, so she was unable to do more than reassure me that the problem was fixable. Being on the left coast they seem to be gone when I get off work. I think the unit was stuck in a cycle that didn't allow me to get to all the screens. I tried different combinations this afternoon and then it went to all the screens. I didn't see anything that had PR, but I did find one setting that went to 6 and the other screens were FEC or something like that. Any way what I put into it seemed to work. I now have a tach again. I will try to get some documentation so that I can at least understand how to set it. Richard I will be talking to you about the heater, It is always cold here when it is calm enough to fly. Thanks Larry ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Harris" <rharris@magnolia-net.com>
Subject: Re: EIS
Date: May 20, 2003
Larry, I think I still have my paper work on my E.I.S. somewhere. If you want I will try to find it, scan and e-mail to you.. My specs are for a 912, but if I remember the instructions cover everthing. Richard Harris MK3 N912RH Lewisville, Arkansas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrel(at)kfalls.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: EIS > > Well I talked to the lady at Grand Rapids today, unfortunately I was at work > rather than at the plane, so she was unable to do more than reassure me that > the problem was fixable. Being on the left coast they seem to be gone when I > get off work. I think the unit was stuck in a cycle that didn't allow me to > get to all the screens. I tried different combinations this afternoon and > then it went to all the screens. I didn't see anything that had PR, but I > did find one setting that went to 6 and the other screens were FEC or > something like that. Any way what I put into it seemed to work. I now have a > tach again. I will try to get some documentation so that I can at least > understand how to set it. > Richard I will be talking to you about the heater, It is always cold > here when it is calm enough to fly. > Thanks > Larry > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Olenik Aviation" <olenik-aviation(at)buyitsellitfixit.com>
"FlyChallenger"
Subject: Is this legal?
Date: May 20, 2003
Hi guys, This is related to flying, but it might not seem like it since I am not naming names.......here is my question. Say there is a distributor for a product who has an exclusive on a large section of territory. Under that distributor there are a hand full of Large dealers that sell retail to consumers and wholesale to smaller dealers. Is it legal for the distributor to dictate to the large dealer which smaller dealers they are allowed to sell wholesale to without any input from the smaller dealer? In essence, the smaller dealer would only have one larger dealer to go to based solely on location and not on preference? I've bought about $52,000 in these products so far in 2003. Roughly $45,000 from one larger dealer and $7000 from another larger dealer. This way, I usually do not have to wait on these products long when things are back ordered or when they screw up the orders, which they do often. So I am a $100,000 per year customer for this line of products and now they are telling me that I can only buy from one of these larger dealers and I don't even have a choice in which one it is. Does not seem right to me. Maybe I'll just forget buying from either of them? Any legal types want to give me some insight here? Any ideas? Thanks, Tom Olenik Olenik Aviation http://www.buyitsellitfixit.com Toll Free: 877-AIR-MOTORS Outside United States: 440-858-9445 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 20, 2003
From: Bob Bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: Is this legal?
You might get some free info from your state attorney general's office. Olenik Aviation wrote: > >Hi guys, > >This is related to flying, but it might not seem like it since I am not >naming names.......here is my question. > >Say there is a distributor for a product who has an exclusive on a large >section of territory. Under that distributor there are a hand full of Large >dealers that sell retail to consumers and wholesale to smaller dealers. Is >it legal for the distributor to dictate to the large dealer which smaller >dealers they are allowed to sell wholesale to without any input from the >smaller dealer? In essence, the smaller dealer would only have one larger >dealer to go to based solely on location and not on preference? > >I've bought about $52,000 in these products so far in 2003. Roughly $45,000 >from one larger dealer and $7000 from another larger dealer. This way, I >usually do not have to wait on these products long when things are back >ordered or when they screw up the orders, which they do often. So I am a >$100,000 per year customer for this line of products and now they are >telling me that I can only buy from one of these larger dealers and I don't >even have a choice in which one it is. Does not seem right to me. Maybe >I'll just forget buying from either of them? > >Any legal types want to give me some insight here? Any ideas? > >Thanks, > >Tom Olenik >Olenik Aviation >http://www.buyitsellitfixit.com >Toll Free: 877-AIR-MOTORS >Outside United States: 440-858-9445 > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chris Sudlow" <sudlow77(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: kolb MIII for sale
Date: May 21, 2003
Hi All, With regret, I'm selling my plane. Pictures are posted on the photoshare list from March 13th of this year. The basics are: MIII Classic with Rotax 582 w/B Box 40 hours TT No damage, always hangared, flies as advertised. Instruments are: Hobbs, aviation key start w/ mag check, BRS 1050, water temp, cylinder temp, RPM, Dual EGT, compass, & 3 blade IVO prop. This is a beautifully built MIII Classic and is N Numbered - N937S. Asking price is $19,500.00. Serious inquiries please call for more info 630-820-6432. Based 40 miles west of Chicago at Cushing Field. Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
From: KolbTwinstar(at)aol.com
Date: May 21, 2003
Subject: Re: kolb MIII for sale
Due to=A0 cutbacks at my job I'm forced to sell my Kolb. Kolb aircraft N560TB New Rotax 503CDI with a=A0 new ground adjustable Warp Prop Paint (Poly Tone) is white with blue and=A0 black trim Fly's Great! Asking $10,950 I also have a 24ft. fully enclosed trailer with electric hoist I would sell with it if needed. Plus kolb accessories. Tracy Briggs 74 Gallop Lane Wentzville Mo. 63385 314-258-1061 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 21, 2003
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)airmail.net>
Subject: Bad Epoxy
Was it bad epoxy or was it the type used. There are different types and some do not take exposure to fuel very well. jerb > > > > > > Regarding cabin heat. has anyone used a "heater core" from a car to > >supply heat to a Mark III? At first glance it seems to be possible. Either a > >12 volt fan or a bit of ducting from the front. Any thoughts? > >Larry > > >Motorcycle radiator & 2 plastic 12V computer fans, works great. >Check it out at >http://www.bcchapel.org/pages/0003/kolb.htm >Look under "Adding A Heater" >If you decide to add a heater, let me know before you start to plumb it, >because I have since found out a bit about plumbing that really helps make >the cooling work better, and it is not yet on the web page. >Just got my airplane back in the air last week after 5 months worth of >mods, and on Saturday I had a batch of bad epoxy dissolve and it was part >of the gas tank mod... Kind'a messy. >Richard Pike >MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 21, 2003
From: Bob Bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: ideas
Kolbers, not much accomplished today but a couple ideas. 1. for the gap seal where the (old kolb) manual says to put a piece of 1/2 " alum tube between the two little 1/4" stubs in the middle-- I found at a local hardware store a perfect piece of extruded U-channel with a 1/4" groove that snaps right in there. I'll glue right to that. The opposing side will be sheet metal as that's where my horizontal geo radiator resides. 2. At the bottom rear of the cage where it meets the boom tube, instead of covering with fabric from the bottom horizontal rung to the boom, I took a left-over rib-to-spar stamping, cut it in half, curved the outer flanges to fit the vertical frame and fit it to the opening with the semi-circular flange facing forward. Zinc chromated it and now have to invent a simple device to keep it from going through the fan. -BB archive if you must ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 21, 2003
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Bad Epoxy
It was the type used, and in my subjective opinion, it was "bad." Full disclosure: so no one else makes my mistake, for years when I needed a small amount of epoxy, the local hobby shop carried "Hobbypoxy" which worked great in all applications. Then that company got out of the hobby business, and the hobby shop now carries a different brand, all varieties of which are quick setting. Don't know the name and can't look it up since I threw it out in disgust, but it is not worthy of a Kolb. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > >Was it bad epoxy or was it the type used. There are different types and >some do not take exposure to fuel very well. >jerb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 21, 2003
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: ideas
How about a good dose of "Goop?" That stuff sticks anything. And I plan on doing the same thing to mine and will be "Gooping" it in place. If you want to wait and see how it works for me, be patient, I am still focused on teething problems with the new 582. (Grrr, grumble, mutter) Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > >At the bottom rear of the cage where it meets the boom tube, instead >of covering with fabric from the bottom horizontal rung to the boom, I >took a left-over rib-to-spar stamping, cut it in half, curved the outer >flanges >to fit the vertical frame and fit it to the opening with the >semi-circular flange >facing forward. Zinc chromated it and now have to invent a simple >device to keep it from going through the fan. -BB archive if you must > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 22, 2003
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)airmail.net>
Subject: Re: ideas
Richard, Where exactly are you using this - I sensed it something to do with fuel tank but not sure what your trying to accomplish. In the mean time I'll do some search on the type you should be using. Does this involve fiber glass such as fuel tanks. A few years back we used T88 to adhere a flange for a threaded fuel valve to the bottom of a fiber glass fuel tank. It worked fine and help up without any problems. If you use T88, don't use old stuff, it will not cure well. Today with the reformulated gas, not sure how it would hold up. Guess you'll have to test it for us. jerb > >How about a good dose of "Goop?" That stuff sticks anything. And I plan on >doing the same thing to mine and will be "Gooping" it in place. If you want >to wait and see how it works for me, be patient, I am still focused on >teething problems with the new 582. (Grrr, grumble, mutter) > >Richard Pike >MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > > > > > >At the bottom rear of the cage where it meets the boom tube, instead > >of covering with fabric from the bottom horizontal rung to the boom, I > >took a left-over rib-to-spar stamping, cut it in half, curved the outer > >flanges > >to fit the vertical frame and fit it to the opening with the > >semi-circular flange > >facing forward. Zinc chromated it and now have to invent a simple > >device to keep it from going through the fan. -BB archive if you must > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kirk Smith" <snuffy(at)usol.com>
Subject: FirestarII seating
Date: May 22, 2003
How much room is in the jump seat of a Firestar II? My girlfriend is 5' 6" and 130 lbs. Is there sufficient room for her? Thanks! Kirk ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: Is this legal?
Date: May 22, 2003
Tom, You might review the federal trade act. We have some expierience with that around here, and it generally addresses the relationship between Wholesalers and retailers, with the emphasis on protecting the retailers. Generally, it is my understanding that a wholesaler, of any kind..be it a distributor or a manufacturer, CANNOT dictate where and for how much a product can be retailed. In other words....no "territories for retail" or prices for retail can be dictated. This is where we coined the term "manuf. Suggested retail price".....it cannot be dictated..only "suggested" and no penalties can be enforced upon a retailer for not adhereing . And no manufacturer or wholesaler can dictate to a retailer just "WHERE" he can sell an item , so anyone dictating territories for RETAIL is in violation. OF course pressure can be brought upon a retailer in other ways......Usually discount levels are compromised...or dating....if a retailer is dealing with a wholesaler whom likes to push. Now...Conversely, relationships between manufacturers and wholesalers are not governed generally, and for the purposes of "DISTRIBUTION", the difference between a "Retailer" and a "Wholesaler" is decided by who collects the sales tax from the end user. I believe a manufacturer can create just about any rules he decides for "Wholesale Distribution". These relationships are not covered by many laws and have only evolved from court decisions over the years resulting from lawsuits. I can tell you that if you have reciived any pressure from a "manufacturer" or a "distributor" that resulted in you giving up any other products so as to become an "Exclusive" distributor or wholesaler of a said companies products, and the company then denies you the distribution rights.( takes the line away)....you can clean their clock in court....this has been done and set a precident just a few years ago that sent waves of new wholesale agreements out in this country to eliminate and language to suggest a wholesaler become exclusive to a product line by eliminating any other lines he carried...competitive or not..... If I read you post correctly....the question is of the legality of any unfavorable "wholesale" rules....and I believe the answer is Yes....they can make any dang rules they want to concerning just where and who a "Retailer" buys from....but NOT where he RETAILS or for how much . It is unfortunate, as practices to keep wholesale prices high result from these tactics, and they usually result in a wholesaler dictateing volume requirements that do in effect reduce the competition with their products and in return for the wholesaler meeting these volume requirements...he recieves a guarantee of "territory" or a number of existing accounts..or a market share. A savvy sales manager will consider markets and attempt to require his wholesale customers buy at a volume level (to maintain discount levels) to effectivly "push" the competitors out. (We call this "tieing up the account" in this Biz). These are common wholesale biz tactics practiced by mostly by foregin countries (generally the socialist ones)that import products into the united states, so without really knowing you or your situation, I can guess who you are talking about. Of course a few American companies have adopted these practices also, some by requirement from a manufacturer..and some by choice. Good Luck Tom.....it can be a tuff fight Don Gherardini Sales / Engineering dept. American Honda Engines Power Equipment Company 800-626-7326 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 22, 2003
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)airmail.net>
Subject: Re: Is this legal?
Often there are sales territories assigned to distributors, example US, or East, Central, West. Supposed to help insure the success of the distributor and help them recover for local support and advertising cost. Bad side is they may be a lousy run operation, mess up you orders, not be responsive, and gouge you since you have limited alternatives. I've also seen some price enforcement practices by HP, ever notice the prices of HP printers when advertised are very close to each other. Then there's MicroSuck. jerb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 22, 2003
From: "John Cooley" <johnc(at)datasync.com>
Subject: Re: FirestarII seating
Hi Kirk and Gang,=0D =0D My wife is very close to your girlfriends height and maybe weighs 5 lbs less She fits in the back seat of my Firestar ok. It is pretty tight getting in and out for anyone. My wife usually fly's with me for 45 minutes or so with no problem. I'm working on my MK III landing gear right now doing the John Hauck special to it. Really look forward to having enough room and HP to take larger passengers. =0D =0D Later,=0D John Cooley=0D =0D =0D -------Original Message-------=0D =0D =0D =0D How much room is in the jump seat of a Firestar II? My girlfriend is 5' 6" and 130 lbs. Is there sufficient room for her? Thanks! Kirk=0D =0D ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Re: Landing Gear
Date: May 22, 2003
I re-named this for the change in subject............................John, I'm real interested in progress reports on your landing gear. Please keep us posted. Lar. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Kolb Mk III - Vamoose N78LB www.gogittum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Cooley" <johnc(at)datasync.com> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: FirestarII seating > > Hi Kirk and Gang,=0D > =0D > My wife is very close to your girlfriends height and maybe weighs 5 lbs less > She fits in the back seat of my Firestar ok. It is pretty tight getting in > and out for anyone. My wife usually fly's with me for 45 minutes or so with > no problem. I'm working on my MK III landing gear right now doing the John > Hauck special to it. Really look forward to having enough room and HP to > take larger passengers. =0D > =0D > Later,=0D > John Cooley=0D > =0D > =0D > -------Original Message-------=0D > =0D > =0D > =0D > How much room is in the jump seat of a Firestar II? My girlfriend is 5' 6" > and 130 lbs. Is there sufficient room for her? Thanks! Kirk=0D > =0D > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: snuffy(at)usol.com
Subject: Re: FirestarII seating
Date: May 22, 2003
> Hi Kirk and Gang,=0D > =0D > My wife is very close to your girlfriends height and maybe weighs 5 lbs less > She fits in the back seat of my Firestar ok. It is pretty tight getting in > and out for anyone. My wife usually fly's with me for 45 minutes or so with > no problem. Thanks John, I have an unfinished Mark 3 and am looking at purchasing a Firestar II as I really think it is more suited to my uses. Will buy one already built. Don't know what I'll do with the Mark 3. Don't what it's worth as it is.............Kirk Do not archive ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: Is this legal?
Date: May 22, 2003
<<>>> You are absoultly 100% correct in the above statement Tom Don Gherardini Sales / Engineering dept. American Honda Engines Power Equipment Company 800-626-7326 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Hauck" <jimh474(at)velocityonline.net>
Subject: MV
Date: May 22, 2003
Y'all; Just got off the phone with Bro John. He is in Trulock, Ca. Said he had a wonderful flight over Yosemite Nat. Park, all the way up to 14,500 ft. John should be in Monterey Bay, Ca this evening. Jim Hauck ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 22, 2003
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Useless tach
I have a problem with either my tach or my ignition system. For the first two hours of running in and test flying the new 582, the tach worked normally, except when I did a mag check. When I switched off one mag, the tach would show a small drop, and you could hear a small decrease in rpm. When I checked the other mag, you could likewise hear a small drop in rpm, but the tach would jump up 500 to 1000 rpm increase, obviously an error, but aside from that, it worked normally. Just to be on the safe side, I used an optical tach to set the static prop pitch so things would be in the ballpark. Now the tach has become totally useless, it shows 7,000-7,500 rpm at full throttle, and 6,000 at half throttle, 55 mph cruise, when it probably ought to be at 4,600-4,800 or thereabouts. But it still reads 2,200 at idle. Big help. And it still shows a small drop for one mag check, and a big increase up for the other. Is there some way I could have wired up things incorrectly to cause this problem, or is it just time to buy a new tach? Thanks, Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Inpection delay.
Date: May 22, 2003
After waiting three weeks for tomorrows airworthiness inspection, my inspector called me today and postponed it till next Friday. I think Linda is ready to bury this guy, if he ever gets here I just might help her. Denny (feeling snubbed) Rowe ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 22, 2003
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)airmail.net>
Subject: Re: Useless tach
Richard, Do you have a Ford or a Chevy tach, is it an analog for lighting coils or Ducati ignition or an EIS. Helps us determine where the problem may lie. Also what points (engine wires/colors) is it connected to. jerb > >I have a problem with either my tach or my ignition system. For the first >two hours of running in and test flying the new 582, the tach worked >normally, except when I did a mag check. When I switched off one mag, the >tach would show a small drop, and you could hear a small decrease in rpm. >When I checked the other mag, you could likewise hear a small drop in rpm, >but the tach would jump up 500 to 1000 rpm increase, obviously an error, >but aside from that, it worked normally. Just to be on the safe side, I >used an optical tach to set the static prop pitch so things would be in the >ballpark. > >Now the tach has become totally useless, it shows 7,000-7,500 rpm at full >throttle, and 6,000 at half throttle, 55 mph cruise, when it probably ought >to be at 4,600-4,800 or thereabouts. But it still reads 2,200 at idle. Big >help. And it still shows a small drop for one mag check, and a big increase >up for the other. > >Is there some way I could have wired up things incorrectly to cause this >problem, or is it just time to buy a new tach? > >Thanks, >Richard Pike >MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 23, 2003
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Useless tach
It is a Westach 2ATH8A2/6 with the little loop wire in the back (which has been cut.) It is connected to the gray wire from the 582 harness, which is the dedicated tach wire. The gray wire goes to pin #2 on the tach, and pin #5 on the tach is grounded, just as Westach calls for. Thanks > >Richard, >Do you have a Ford or a Chevy tach, is it an analog for lighting coils or >Ducati ignition or an EIS. Helps us determine where the problem may >lie. Also what points (engine wires/colors) is it connected to. >jerb > > > > >I have a problem with either my tach or my ignition system. For the first > >two hours of running in and test flying the new 582, the tach worked > >normally, except when I did a mag check. When I switched off one mag, the > >tach would show a small drop, and you could hear a small decrease in rpm. > >When I checked the other mag, you could likewise hear a small drop in rpm, > >but the tach would jump up 500 to 1000 rpm increase, obviously an error, > >but aside from that, it worked normally. Just to be on the safe side, I > >used an optical tach to set the static prop pitch so things would be in the > >ballpark. > > > >Now the tach has become totally useless, it shows 7,000-7,500 rpm at full > >throttle, and 6,000 at half throttle, 55 mph cruise, when it probably ought > >to be at 4,600-4,800 or thereabouts. But it still reads 2,200 at idle. Big > >help. And it still shows a small drop for one mag check, and a big increase > >up for the other. > > > >Is there some way I could have wired up things incorrectly to cause this > >problem, or is it just time to buy a new tach? > > > >Thanks, > >Richard Pike > >MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Monument Valley
Date: May 22, 2003
I'm surprised there haven't been any other comments from the Monument Valley trippers. I thought a great time was had by all. Unhappily, my shiny new digital camera died - and is on its' way back to Nikon - after the 1st day of flying, but I did take plenty of pics in that one day. Today, I sat down, and put together a web page on the trip, so I'll put the address below. It was really tough, deciding which pics to use. That is such a beautiful area, it was hard to stop. I hope you-all enjoy the pics. Lar. http://www.webpictures.homestead.com.travelling.html Click on "Monument Valley '03." Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Kolb Mk III - Vamoose N78LB www.gogittum.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Re: Monument Valley
Date: May 22, 2003
Hmmm................don't seem to be working, tho' it does by typing it in direct. Let's try again: http://www.webpictures.homestead.com/travelling.html Click on "Monument Valley '03 Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Kolb Mk III - Vamoose N78LB www.gogittum.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Cavuontop(at)aol.com
Date: May 23, 2003
Subject: Re: Useless tach
Brother Pike: I had the same situation with my tach-- obviously incorrect reading on one mag, but seeming correct when on both. I spoke with Kerry Yunck at Lockwood and he indicated there is a stator defect which pops up on some of the older 582s. You might give him a call. Mark R. Sellers Kolb Twinstar Mark III, N496BM ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim and Phyllis Hefner" <hefners_tucson(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Monument Valley
Date: May 23, 2003
Subject: Monument Valley From: Larry Bourne (biglar(at)gogittum.com) Date: Thu May 22 - 9:45 PM -- Kolb-List message posted by: "Larry Bourne" biglar(at)gogittum.com "I'm surprised there haven't been any other comments from the Monument Valley trippers. I thought a great time was had by all." Lar,great job on the website pictures and commentary!!! We did truly have awonderful time and it was great to meet everyone that came and now be able to put a face with a name. I saw where Tom and Betty had some adventureonthe way home.... guesswhere there's a trace of a problem, there's a bigger problem waiting to get worse. I hada similar adventure getting back to Tucson .... just got in this morning. I had an overheating situation around Kayenta when I wastowing my trailer into a baddust storm.... wellto make a long story short, my car started overheating when it wasn't even working hard after heading home and by the time I got about 15miles south of Chinle, where Canyon deChelley is located, Ihad to park the trailer off the road and limp back to Chinle. It overheated without pulling a trailer... You mightknow, it was after hours, so getting help was a challenge.... finally got the police station to contact a towing service and hadthem go fetch my trailer and park it in the Canyon de Chelly campground. Needless to say, a wrecker with a big yellow light towing my big trailer and depositing into a camping spot brought out lots of curiosity seekers from all over the campground, so I had the trailer open and everyone came to look at the Firefly. Turns outthe closest place to get a car serviced when you break down on the Navajo reservation(unless you are trust youcar to local "shade tree mechanics", which I didn't)was Gallup, NM, which is 95miles away. The next morning thesame tow truck and driver picked me and my car up and hauled us to Gallup to the Ford dealer there.As I expected, itturned out to be a failed thermostat. Cost $100 forthe parts and labor and $375 in towing fees between the car and trailer.... OUCH!!! Oh well, it was a reasonably priced trip until then...I had had such a wonderful time upat M.V.the past several days, so I didn't let this little misfortune bother me much at all. While I waited on my car, I watched myvideo from Monument Valley and Lake Powell flights to remind me of more pleasant things. I was glad to have my wheels back late afternoon yesterday, with a holiday weekend fast approaching, when getting anything fixed would be impossible. I hooked onto the trailer and started toward Tucson around 7pm last night and got back toSanManuel airport around 5:30am this morning. Lar, I did log a little over 5.5hrs in the FF while up there. When you pull the plane there and don't do the cross country flying, you are more motivated to get out there and see the sights I guess. I especially enjoyed the Lake Powell flight on Wed morning, but was frustrated not to be able to ID Rainbow Bridge.... saw in another post where Boyd and others spotted it.... oh well, next time. Due to holiday plans, I won't be back at my house until Monday night, so I won't be able to retrieve any digital pic's or video untilprobably mid next week. It was a wonderful time and a great group of folks. Hope we do something like this again, whether at M.V. or somewhere else. Whitefish would be great, but probably a stretch for hauling my FF... might make a nice motorcycle trip though. Happy Memorial Day to the Vets! It was really fun listening to the war stories of helicopter flying by John Hauck and John Williamson! Hanging out mid day story tellingand around campfires in the evening were as enjoyable as the flying (almost!). Jim Hefner Tucson, AZ FF#022 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net>
Subject: landing gear
Date: May 24, 2003
I have read about a gear leg change on the ultrastar?, why is that, mine is completely stock. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Swiderski" <swiderski@advanced-connect.net>
Subject: Re: landing gear
Date: May 23, 2003
Ronnie, My reasons were as follows: 1) every bump is transmitted to every rivot & bolt in the airframe. 2) I was using my US as a lawn mower too often. 3) It restricted the prop diameter. 4) Tortoise holes, ant hills & hidden ruts too often bent or broke the gear. Going to a shock absorbing taller gear solved all of these (for me, serious) problems. Raising the gear a foot, dropping the engine a few inches & adding a gearbox (which replaced the multi-V belt redrive that was prone to cracking & no longer available for parts, plus it made a few more inches clearance between prop & boomtube) gave me greater ground clearance & allowed the use of a 60" prop which in turn boosted the static thrust from 225lb with the 50" prop to 275lb with the 60" prop. Later, I inlaid p-tips into the prop which took the thrust to over 300lbs. Over all, it made a huge difference in performance and rough field capability. ...Richard Swiderski . > > I have read about a gear leg change on the ultrastar?, why is that, mine is completely stock. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net>
Subject: Re: landing gear
Date: May 24, 2003
thanks richard, Now I am in the know! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Swiderski" <
swiderski@advanced-connect.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: landing gear <swiderski@advanced-connect.net> > > Ronnie, > > My reasons were as follows: > 1) every bump is transmitted to every rivot & bolt in the airframe. > 2) I was using my US as a lawn mower too often. > 3) It restricted the prop diameter. > 4) Tortoise holes, ant hills & hidden ruts too often bent or broke the gear. > Going to a shock absorbing taller gear solved all of these (for me, > serious) problems. Raising the gear a foot, dropping the engine a few > inches & adding a gearbox (which replaced the multi-V belt redrive that was > prone to cracking & no longer available for parts, plus it made a few more > inches clearance between prop & boomtube) gave me greater ground clearance & > allowed the use of a 60" prop which in turn boosted the static thrust from > 225lb with the 50" prop to 275lb with the 60" prop. Later, I inlaid p-tips > into the prop which took the thrust to over 300lbs. Over all, it made a > huge difference in performance and rough field capability. ...Richard > Swiderski > > . > > > > I have read about a gear leg change on the ultrastar?, why is that, mine > is completely stock. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 23, 2003
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: P-tips?
><swiderski@advanced-connect.net> >Later, I inlaid p-tips > > into the prop which took the thrust to over 300lbs. Over all, it made a > > huge difference in performance and rough field capability. ...Richard > > Swiderski Tell us more about p-tips and how you did it. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net>
Subject: Re: landing gear
Date: May 24, 2003
What is involved in the change?off list is ok. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Swiderski" <swiderski@advanced-connect.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: landing gear <swiderski@advanced-connect.net> > > Ronnie, > > My reasons were as follows: > 1) every bump is transmitted to every rivot & bolt in the airframe. > 2) I was using my US as a lawn mower too often. > 3) It restricted the prop diameter. > 4) Tortoise holes, ant hills & hidden ruts too often bent or broke the gear. > Going to a shock absorbing taller gear solved all of these (for me, > serious) problems. Raising the gear a foot, dropping the engine a few > inches & adding a gearbox (which replaced the multi-V belt redrive that was > prone to cracking & no longer available for parts, plus it made a few more > inches clearance between prop & boomtube) gave me greater ground clearance & > allowed the use of a 60" prop which in turn boosted the static thrust from > 225lb with the 50" prop to 275lb with the 60" prop. Later, I inlaid p-tips > into the prop which took the thrust to over 300lbs. Over all, it made a > huge difference in performance and rough field capability. ...Richard > Swiderski > > . > > > > I have read about a gear leg change on the ultrastar?, why is that, mine > is completely stock. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 24, 2003
From: "Mike Pierzina" <planecrazzzy(at)lycos.com>
Subject: Exhaust brackets
Hey Guys, This is a RE- post (most of you were outa town) I tried searching the archives concerning the problem that was talked about the exhaust brackets that were cracking....( NO LUCK ).did you guys replace them I would like to make it right the FIRST time. Gotta Fly...Mike --- Sometimes you just have to take the leap and build your wings on the way down... Gotta Fly... Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kirk Smith" <snuffy(at)usol.com>
Subject: KXP??????????
Date: May 24, 2003
Group, What is the KXP model Kolb? Is it the firestar 2? Features? Thanks!!! Kirk ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 24, 2003
From: "Mike Pierzina" <planecrazzzy(at)lycos.com>
Subject: Wing Rack
Hey Guys, While I've been building my plane I've aways been TIGHT on SPACE. When the wings were done (skeleton) they took up alot of room, but they could be HUNG UP,but it seemed they were always in the way... Once I started the "fabric stage" I thought they would really be a "bear" to deal with. I had a little furniture cart (4caster swivel wheels) so I put a 1" sq.tubing frame,higher than the wing so it could be secured to the rack.... It works great edge rests on the carpet of the cart and I slapped some duct tape on the sq. tubing to smooth it out. The carts are around $14. Some guys asked for pictures of it , but the ones I had didn't show it very good... I took some pictures of it on my last roll, and their back....So if you would like to see it just let me know. I think the cart is going to be handy to have even after it's done,or is it ever done ? I know after mine is flying I'll have alot of other MOD'S to improve it , and I'm sure the wings will be in the way.... Gotta Fly... Mike --- Sometimes you just have to take the leap and build your wings on the way down... Gotta Fly... Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 24, 2003
From: "John Cooley" <johnc(at)datasync.com>
Subject: Re: Wing Rack
Hi Mike,=0D I would like to see your rack. I have similar problems moving the wings around.=0D =0D Thanks,=0D John =0D =0D -------Original Message-------=0D =0D From: kolb-list(at)matronics.com=0D Date: Saturday, May 24, 2003 10:25:28 AM=0D Subject: Kolb-List: Wing Rack=0D =0D =0D Hey Guys,=0D While I've been building my plane I've aways been TIGHT on SPACE.=0D When the wings were done (skeleton) they took up alot of room, but they could be HUNG UP,but it seemed they were always in the way...=0D Once I started the "fabric stage" I thought they would really be a "bear" to deal with.=0D I had a little furniture cart (4caster swivel wheels) so I put a 1" sq tubing frame,higher than the wing so it could be secured to the rack.... It works great , The wings can be moved anywhere,any direction, one wing or both. the leading edge rests on the carpet of the cart and I slapped some duct tape on the sq. tubing to smooth it out. The carts are around $14.=0D Some guys asked for pictures of it , but the ones I had didn't show it very good...=0D I took some pictures of it on my last roll, and their back....So if you would like to see it just let me know. I think the cart is going to be handy to have even after it's done,or is it ever done ?=0D I know after mine is flying I'll have alot of other MOD'S to improve it , and I'm sure the wings will be in the way....=0D Gotta Fly...=0D Mike=0D =0D =0D ---=0D Sometimes you just have to take the leap=0D and build your wings on the way down...=0D Gotta Fly...=0D =0D =0D Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail!=0D =0D =0D =0D =0D =0D =0D =2E ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Harris" <rharris@magnolia-net.com>
Subject: GPS
Date: May 24, 2003
Hey Gang, I need some input.. I have a opportunity to buy a Garmin GPS 90 that a friend of a friend had in his airplane when crashed. I can get the unit and everything that came with the original GPS 90 kit for $150.00. Anyone know anything about this GPS? Thanks, Richard Harris MK3 N912RH Lewisville, Arkansas ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 24, 2003
From: "Dallas Shepherd" <cen23954(at)centurytel.net>
Subject: Re: GPS
Richard: I have used a GPS 90 since 1997 and was considered right up with the top=0D hand helds at that time. I like it and have used it a lot. Takes some practice to use =0D all the programs. Try to get the direction book with it so you won't be lost with all =0D the things its capable of. I hooked it into the 12 volts of my kolb and used it constantly=0D while flying. Liked to check my speed with it also. You'll like it for that price. It=0D survives crashes too.=0D Dallas Shepherd=0D Norfork, Arkansas=0D Former Kolb owner=0D =0D -------Original Message-------=0D =0D From: kolb-list(at)matronics.com=0D Date: Saturday, May 24, 2003 11:44:41 AM=0D Subject: Kolb-List: GPS=0D =0D =0D Hey Gang, I need some input.. I have a opportunity to buy a Garmin GPS 90=0D that a friend of a friend had in his airplane when crashed.=0D I can get the unit and everything that came with the original GPS 90 kit for=0D $150.00. Anyone know anything about this GPS?=0D =0D Thanks,=0D =0D Richard Harris=0D MK3 N912RH=0D Lewisville, Arkansas=0D =0D =0D =0D =0D =0D =0D =0D =2E ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "George Thompson" <eagle1(at)commspeed.net>
Subject: Re: KXP??????????
Date: May 24, 2003
The KXP is the single place heavy duty Firestar. It has the stronger 7 rib wing as opposed to the earler 6 rib. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kirk Smith" <snuffy(at)usol.com> Subject: Kolb-List: KXP?????????? > > Group, > > What is the KXP model Kolb? Is it the firestar 2? Features? Thanks!!! Kirk > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Petty" <ppetty@c-gate.net>
Subject: The Factory...
Date: May 24, 2003
Kolbers, What a ride!!!! First ride in a Kolb for Charlie and I and let me say...WOW!!!! way more than Charley or I expected. I guess that I have been apprehensive about flying in one of these planes from the start but love the way they look and respect the way they are admired by all of you. Second the numbers of the aircraft are very impressive and sorta like my HD power numbers grabbed some of you guys attention, so did the Kolb. Before I tell you of the great experience we had, let me first thank the folks at the TNK factory. What a class act! Charley and I punched out at 0500 from LUL and had planned to be there by 10:00am to spend the day. So much for that. We made it about 40 miles north, in hopes that conditions would improve when the call was made that it was IFR to any stops that we had planned for fuel. So back to LUL we went and waited it out. At 0900 it looked like we may be able to make Huntsville, our only gas stop so we went for it. How did that go? NOT TOO GOOD... Was forced west into Muscle Shoals because of IFR conditions. Determined, we waited there for a while and conditions improved for a shot at Shelbyville.So off we went. Made Shelbyville no probe but still a ways from London. I called Linda from there and told her that depending on conditions we should be able to make it by late Friday. She said that they would set up a Saturday visit for us and that was the plan. As you know, I'm a student pilot with only 23 hrs. This for me was an adventure in it's self so I'm not complaining. Had the opportunity to see a lot of airports,FBO's, dandy aircraft and FBO attendants!!!!:-) Acutely did a weight load chart to see if one darling FBO attendant would fit...errs got to lose 20 more lbs.... oh well..... Back to the trip. We hammered out of Shelbyville and from there on I'm glad I was flying with a veteran pilot like Charley Harris. Geezzz folks I was butt puckered for the next 2.8 hrs we flew through the mountains (as we flat Landers call them) Hills to the rest of the aviation public, very poor conditions, clouds just over the top of the wings, who knows what just under. Spooky stuff for me folks. But in the end we arrive at LON at 4:00pm and jump on the cell phones. Yall all know the factory's answering service.. I could not reach Linda so went for parts. Turns out parts guy, forgive me cant remember his name answers.... Thank god!!! and turns out he is a "Beast fan" said he is a cloak listener of the list but got a gas out of my project. After all was said and done with the phone tag Norm arrived and we crammed into his sports car for a ride to the factory. Note to Kolb customers.... If Norm come's to pick you up? Fasten your seatbelt... Just a note......trust me..... Norm was kind enough as well as Linda and Don to stay late and give us a demo ride and tour of the factory. After we had a look around the facility's Norm had made a few fly by's in the Mark III Xtra and Charley as well as myself were worn slap out from the whole trip but hopes were high weather was perfect and the time came to shut up, get in, and go flying..... Norm as I understand is a great pilot (also a salesperson for Kolb) Hell of a sports car driver...(needs to have the right rear checked on that 100mph sports car Only if ya ask me) He does a great job I strapped in after signing the waivers""" reminded me of Disney World""" and scared shitless of ' First time in a Stick and Rudder tail dragger (only after hearing all the horror stories about these contraptions)....... here we go............ Norm, Our Demo Pilot was very good to explain the aircraft as we taxied onto the runway. He fully explained how Kolb aircraft worked and was personal to me as a Cessna 150 student pilot. He said " I flew Cessna's for 20 years and in the 70's "Ultralight aircraft was introduced to me and I said nope'''' no thanks''''' He went on to demonstrate to me how Cessna student pilots tend to climb out at higher altitudes and veer away from possible landing site in case of trouble. The Mark III X-TRA has been the plane of my choice from the get-go............ After Meeting John Hauck and Looking at his unique MkIII I wanted taller landing gear..... Charley was so tired from the trip he went up with Norm and was Highly impressed...but..... We hung around ad drilled the factory folks about engines/Kits/competition Let me close with this...... The Kolbra.... WOW after all we did and all we were able to do there... the KOLBRA No doubt the first Kolb that we will build hands down.......... Trip home out of London was wonderful I flew 217 out of Huntsville to LUL and Charley flew the CO-150 to the farm. TAT 12.6 Thanks to everyone @ the TNK Factory pp.... N4958P archive if you wish God Bless ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 24, 2003
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Wing Rack
> >Hey Guys, > While I've been building my plane I've aways been TIGHT > on SPACE. > When the wings were done (skeleton) they took up alot of room, but they > could be HUNG UP,but it seemed they were always in the way... I hang my wings up one on either side of a two car garage, horizontally & next to the ceiling, airfoil bottom side down. At the root end of the wing, I have a six foot long section of 2" pvc pipe suspended horizontally from the ceiling. About 2/3's toward the tip, I have another 6' length of 2" pvc hung from the ceiling by one end. Hanging adjacent to the other end of the 6' length of pvc is a loop of cord. The pvc pipe is just far enough from the ceiling that the wings will lay flat on them, yet my wife and I can still reach high enough to get the wings on them. My wife and I raise the wing up and I slide the wing root end over the one level pvc tube. Then while she continues to hold the wingtip end up, I raise the other pvc pipe to horizontal, taking up the weight of the wing, and slip the cord loop over the end of the pipe. Then all I need to do is anchor the ailerons and flaps because they tend to hang down too far. Maybe that is something useful to somebody. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Re: Wing Rack
Date: May 24, 2003
Mike, The photos worked fine, where did you buy the cart? Denny ----- Original Message ----- From: Mike Pierzina <planecrazzzy(at)lycos.com> Subject: Kolb-List: Wing Rack > > Hey Guys, > While I've been building my plane I've aways been TIGHT on SPACE. > When the wings were done (skeleton) they took up alot of room, but they could be HUNG UP,but it seemed they were always in the way... > Once I started the "fabric stage" I thought they would really be a "bear" to deal with. > I had a little furniture cart (4caster swivel wheels) so I put a 1" sq.tubing frame,higher than the wing so it could be secured to the rack.... It works great , The wings can be moved anywhere,any direction, one wing or both. the leading edge rests on the carpet of the cart and I slapped some duct tape on the sq. tubing to smooth it out. The carts are around $14. > Some guys asked for pictures of it , but the ones I had didn't show it very good... > I took some pictures of it on my last roll, and their back....So if you would like to see it just let me know. I think the cart is going to be handy to have even after it's done,or is it ever done ? > I know after mine is flying I'll have alot of other MOD'S to improve it > Gotta Fly... > Mike > > > --- > Sometimes you just have to take the leap > and build your wings on the way down... > Gotta Fly... > > > Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail! > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Swiderski" <swiderski@advanced-connect.net>
Subject: Re: landing gear
Date: May 24, 2003
Ronnie, Its a long story, its already in the archives. If you can't find it give me a call some evening before 10pm. Richard Swiderski 352-307-9009 ----- Original Message ----- From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: landing gear > > What is involved in the change?off list is ok. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Richard Swiderski" <swiderski@advanced-connect.net> > To: > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: landing gear > > > <swiderski@advanced-connect.net> > > > > Ronnie, > > > > My reasons were as follows: > > 1) every bump is transmitted to every rivot & bolt in the airframe. > > 2) I was using my US as a lawn mower too often. > > 3) It restricted the prop diameter. > > 4) Tortoise holes, ant hills & hidden ruts too often bent or broke the > gear. > > Going to a shock absorbing taller gear solved all of these (for me, > > serious) problems. Raising the gear a foot, dropping the engine a few > > inches & adding a gearbox (which replaced the multi-V belt redrive that > was > > prone to cracking & no longer available for parts, plus it made a few more > > inches clearance between prop & boomtube) gave me greater ground clearance > & > > allowed the use of a 60" prop which in turn boosted the static thrust from > > 225lb with the 50" prop to 275lb with the 60" prop. Later, I inlaid > p-tips > > into the prop which took the thrust to over 300lbs. Over all, it made a > > huge difference in performance and rough field capability. ...Richard > > Swiderski > > > > . > > > > > > I have read about a gear leg change on the ultrastar?, why is that, mine > > is completely stock. > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HShack(at)aol.com
Date: May 24, 2003
Subject: Re: KXP??????????
In a message dated 5/24/03 5:29:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time, ulpilot(at)cavtel.net writes: > The FS KXP is of the 1990 vintage. It is a single place with each wing > having 7 ribs instead of 5 as the FS KX does. In addition to the stronger > wing, a rotax 503 can be used for power instead of the 447. The FS 1 and 2 > model have larger cockpits than the KXP. > Jim Ballenger > With a 503 DCDI it seems to fly a little better than a FS II. There seems to be no way to put more than a 5 gallon fuel tank in [permanently]. Shack FS II SC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GeoR38(at)aol.com
Date: May 24, 2003
Subject: Re: KXP??????????
In a message dated 5/24/03 8:53:13 AM Eastern Daylight Time, snuffy(at)usol.com writes: > > Group, > > What is the KXP model Kolb? Is it the firestar 2? Features? Thanks!!! > Kirk > > I have a KX, which is just after the Original, I think....it has the option to not cover the fuselage behind the pilots head, and is supposed to have a new technique for folding the elevator (although mine still had the old original approach) and the KXP was the same thing except for the 7 rib wing. George Randolph driver of the first KX, I think 1992 Akron, ohio, home of LeBron James ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Austin" <joandlp(at)starband.net>
Subject: Tandem vs Side By Side ?
Date: May 25, 2003
BlankHello Group, We will probably be buying a Kolb in the next year (for all the reasons you folks fly them) I am trying to decide between tandem and side by side. My wife and I would prefer the side by side but I weight about 80 pounds more than her. When training in a Quick the instructor weighted less than I and that resulted in a constant right stick pressure to balance. Will this be a problem with say a MarkIII or would I be better off with a tandem? Thanks in advance for all your input. Larry Do Not Meddle in the Affairs of Dragons...for You are Crunchy & Good with Ketchup ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 25, 2003
From: Duncan McBride <duncanmcbride(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Tandem vs Side By Side ?
Most everybody fits a trim tab on the right aileron to adjust for solo or dual flying. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Austin" <joandlp(at)starband.net> Subject: Kolb-List: Tandem vs Side By Side ? > > BlankHello Group, > > We will probably be buying a Kolb in the next year (for all the reasons you > folks fly them) I am trying to decide between tandem and side by side. My > wife and I would prefer the side by side but I weight about 80 pounds more > than her. When training in a Quick the instructor weighted less than I and > that resulted in a constant right stick pressure to balance. Will this be a > problem with say a MarkIII or would I be better off with a tandem? Thanks in > advance for all your input. > > Larry > > > Do Not Meddle in the Affairs of Dragons...for You are Crunchy & Good with > Ketchup > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Petty" <ppetty@c-gate.net>
Subject: reflections
Date: May 25, 2003
Kolbers, As I reflect back on this weekend's trip to the factory, I often think of all the comments made about my HD project being a giant vibrator. Although my experience in the M3X was the best flying experience yet, the noise and vibration was overwhelming.... The high RPM the Rotax has to make to produce the power needed also transmits high vibration through out the airframe. Quite possibly the warp drive prop is part of the blame, not sure. At any rate after the demo ride I wonder... would my HD with it's ability to produce high torque at any RPM be smoother perhaps? Sure makes me want to complete a redrive and find out! The only turn off's on light sport aircraft to me is the feeling of flying a weed eater.... Today I was weed wacking my fence and as I was going along I couldn't help but to think of standing on the flight line at the ultralight section at Sun n Fun no phun intended... The ballistic wide open screaming of the 2 strokes as well as the 912 just is spooky to me. Call me what ever you wish, but I like raw bottom line horsepower... We (Charley,Johnny,Steve and myself) plan to become Kolb dealers. With our 5000 sq ft heated and air conditioned shop and the love of sport light aircraft, should be able to provide a good base of operation as well as a great place to fly into and out of. With South Mississippi Light Aircraft just 70 miles to the south east as a Rotax repair center, we feel that we are in a great place to build and sell Kolb aircraft. Rans is also a great company, however they, to us, do not appear to be nearly as professional as the kind folk's at TNK. With that said Kolb is our choice and were sticking to it. As for powerplant's well...... we just feel that there is a better solution. The Kolb folk's when asked about the other powerplant's on the market would not knock the competition even if provoked. Their reply was simply "We prefer the Rotax" witch tells me that there is room for a better engine. But where will it come from? I feel that it will come from us. Just give us time. We are working on a 3 cylinder 120 hp high torque radial light weight solution to this market.Our smart guy has already had one Paul Harvey interview. Who knows what's next... I'm out of here to go fly the 150~~~~ C-ya pp.... N4958P ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Russell Phillips" <rphillip1999(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: flap deflection
Date: May 26, 2003
Getting real close to the covering stage on a Mark III classic,(neverdone it before so I'm a little nervous about it) so I'm trying to get everything ready ; wingtip strobes wired, fabric rivet holes, hinge rivet holes drilled etc. etc. One thing I need to fix is the amount of flap deflection I have. It is excessive - probably around 50 degrees at the last notch.I suspect it may be because of the position I installed the flaphorn, which I did according to the manual if a 912 is to be used (perpendicular to the bottom of the wing). I was wondering if anyone else had this problem, and if so how did you solve it? It looks like the easiest way is to replace the flat piece the flap handle fits into and make my own notches to achieve the proper deflection, but I might be missing something. Any advice would be appreciated. Russ,inchilly western NY ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 25, 2003
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: flap deflection
One of the easiest cures for excessive deflection is to drill another hole in the actuating lever at the end of the flap handle. If you move the hole toward the pivot point, you reduce the amount of travel and increase your leverage. You may need to make up a new connecting link of a different length, but that is simple. You can even make a couple extra holes in the lever arm and see which one you like, I did. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > >One thing I need to fix is the amount of flap deflection I have. It is >excessive - probably around 50 degrees at the last notch.I suspect it may >be because of the position I installed the flaphorn, which I did according >to the manual if a 912 is to be used (perpendicular to the bottom of the >wing). I was wondering if anyone else had this problem, and if so how did >you solve it? It looks like the easiest way is to replace the flat piece >the flap handle fits into and make my own notches to achieve the proper >deflection, but I might be missing something. Any advice would be appreciated. > > >Russ,inchilly western NY > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 25, 2003
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Tandem vs Side By Side ?
Adjustable trim tabs easily deal with anything like that. (As long as you remember to reset it before you take off...) If you forget, it's just a minor nuisance. One other thought - never got into or out of a Kolbra, especially the back seat, but as the years pass, I suspect the MKIII might require less athletics? (We had checked out a Challenger before we got the Kolb. Discovered that the challenge was the Good Lookin' Old Poop getting in and out of the back seat. That was a sight to behold...Could'a sold tickets and paid it off in six weeks...) Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > >BlankHello Group, > >We will probably be buying a Kolb in the next year (for all the reasons you >folks fly them) I am trying to decide between tandem and side by side. My >wife and I would prefer the side by side but I weight about 80 pounds more >than her. When training in a Quick the instructor weighted less than I and >that resulted in a constant right stick pressure to balance. Will this be a >problem with say a MarkIII or would I be better off with a tandem? Thanks in >advance for all your input. > >Larry > > >Do Not Meddle in the Affairs of Dragons...for You are Crunchy & Good with >Ketchup > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: KXP??????????
Date: May 26, 2003
Dang Kirk...I feel awful for ya pard....we have had labs around here since i was a boy, and my kids , although grown up now...never knew life without one..or several....and Ive lost a special one or two myself.....it tough I know...get you another one....dont worry about it "not being as good as Cocoa"...Im sure it wont be the same, But I will tell you that they ALL can be special in their own way...and dont think that you wont love the next one just as strong ....the sooner the better my friend, I promise it will help a lot! Finished painting and started reassembling today gents....FINALLY.....and I believe that im gonna take that advice about painting the next one battleship gray with a roller, this one is a beaut....but I aint gonna take on a chore like this for a long time again. check er out on page 10 http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm Don Gherardini- FireFly 098 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Swiderski" <swiderski@advanced-connect.net>
Subject: Re: P-tips?
Date: May 26, 2003
Richard Pike, I copied them from a picture in Ultralight Fying years back. A Canadian company was offering them. It is basically a .049 piece of 6061-T6 aluminum sheet inlaid in the tip of the prop with a 90 degree bend in it (about 3/4" high) that also extends beyond the trailing edge about 3/4". It looks like a Prince P-Tip prop. It cuts out much of the prop tip's vortex & redirects it as thrust, while lowering the noise level. On a 50" prop it gave me a 12% increase in thrust and climb rate & a 12% decrease in fuel burn and rpm for a given speed. For a 60" prop it made a 10% difference. The 50" was a 2 blade & the 60" was a 3-blade, both were different brands as well. The p-tip plates were inlaid, JB Weld epoxied & screwed together with 3 stainless steel flush mounted screws. No rocket science involved, just need to make sure the bends have a proper radius & be careful with maintaining balance. If you are making 270lbs static thrust they'll put you over the 300lb mark & that's a kick in the pants you can feel. You get more power, burn less fuel, make less noise, you end up with a tougher prop, & its virtually free. I just sold my prop & converted 582 SeaDoo engine to a guy in GA, so I can't get a picture. I'm trying to get my son to make me a website to detail my conversion of the Chevy Sprint Turbo 3 cyl engine. Maybe I'll get a drawing up on it. Richard Swiderski > ><swiderski@advanced-connect.net> > >Later, I inlaid p-tips into the prop which took the thrust to over 300lbs. ...Richard Swiderski > Tell us more about p-tips and how you did it. > > Richard Pike > MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kirk Smith" <snuffy(at)usol.com>
Subject: Re: KXP??????????
Date: May 26, 2003
Don, You would certainly know how the darn mutts can worm their way into your heart then. I will probably get another pup but not until I got a fence up. God I don't want that to happen again. Thank you so much for your understanding........Kirk ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: KXP?????????? > > Dang Kirk...I feel awful for ya pard....we have had labs around here since > i was a boy, and my kids , although grown up now...never knew life without > one..or several....and Ive lost a special one or two myself.....it tough I > know...get you another one....dont worry about it "not being as good as > Cocoa"...Im sure it wont be the same, But I will tell you that they ALL can > be special in their own way...and dont think that you wont love the next one > just as strong ....the sooner the better my friend, I promise it will help a > lot! > > Finished painting and started reassembling today gents....FINALLY.....and I > believe that im gonna take that advice about painting the next one > battleship gray with a roller, this one is a beaut....but I aint gonna take > on a chore like this for a long time again. > > check er out on page 10 > > http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm > Don Gherardini- > FireFly 098 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: monument valley
From: Erich_Weaver(at)URSCorp.com
05/26/2003 12":20:23.PM(at)matronics.com, MIME-CD complete at 05/26/2003 12:20:23.PM(at)matronics.com, Serialize by Router on SMTP102/URSCorp(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 05/26/2003 12:21:08.PM(at)matronics.com
Date: May 26, 2003
Got back from the Monument Valley trip Saturday evening. What a great trip, and so cool just looking down that patch of dirt and seeing so many Kolbs with the beautiful red cliffs in the background. The early morning flights when the light made everything glow were spectacular. Big Lar has the list of people, but by my memory, it was attended by John Hauck (Alabama), Larry Bourne (California), Boyd Young (Utah), Dave and Eva (?) Pelletier (Arizona), Jim Heffner (Arizona), John Williamson (Texas), Dave Rains (Texas), Dennis Kirby (New Mexico), Tom and Betty Kuffel, and myself, with wife Sonja and daughter Kendall (California). Lar, did I forget anybody? The weather was fantastic, and I flew each morning and afternoon, except for when I took the ground tour. Lar's photos captured the essence, but I'll try to share a few more photos of interest on the Matronics Photo share. The place emptied out on Wednesday, and just wasnt the same once all those Kolbs left. The wife and kid and I left and went to Page, AZ., gawking at the Glen Canyon dam, Lake Powell, and then doing a a 1/2 day raft trip down the Colorado River, going from the dam down to Lee's Ferry. From there, continued over for more gawking at the Grand Canyon on Friday before driving home. My answering machine at home had a message from John H indicating that he had made it over the Sierra and through Yosemite before heading south and landing at my home airport, Santa Ynez. Sounds like he moved on since neither I nor his other local buddy were around. Folks, this guy is an animal! The journeys and mileage this guy is cranking out in his Kolb are unbelievable! I salute you John, and was thrilled to hang out with you for a few days in a great spot. When I first got interested in ultralights about four years ago, this trip was a dream of mine. Now its been done, and the great group of people that were there to share it with made it that much better. I would gladly do it all again, and I know there is plenty of sightseeing left to do within an easy days flight from MV. Its not too early to start planning Erich Weaver ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Johann G." <johann(at)gi.is>
Subject: New homepage.
Date: May 26, 2003
Hello list members. If anyone is interested, here is my new homepage, where my Kolb and Zenith projects can be seen. It is the same link, but more to see. http://www.gi.is/fis/ Hope it can help some builders with their project. Best wishes, Johann G. Iceland. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "boyd young" <by0ung(at)brigham.net>
Subject: monument valley
Date: May 26, 2003
WOW monument valley was great..... I have started this about 3 or 4 times but i cant ever seem to get the words to express the feelings. It seemed like everyone in the group had been friends for such a long time.. and the trip only seemed to make everyone closer. It was fun to sit and chat together and hear some of the stories that we havent shared on the net. I have learned a great respect for John H and John W. as their trips are continuing.... I put on about 1000 air miles and their trips are going to be in the 4000 mile range. I remember on the way down the first 4 hours or so was a great adventure....... then the last hour and a half to two seemed to take forever.... I think that some of the desert in southern Utah is only there to keep the other parts of the state further apart. Since I have been home my wife had decided that it is warm enough to go flying and has had me take her up for 2 1/2 hours the last few days. Larry, have you had a chance to find out what is wrong with your camera? It was good to know that the pictures on your memory stick did not get erased. I have not been able to get my digital camera to talk with my computer.... It starts out like it will work then at the time it should start downloading pictures everything just stops....I think it is the computer, not the camera. On the trip home i picked up one of the disposable cameras for pictures of rainbow bridge and lake powell.. I hope they turn out.... if not I suppose that I will have to do the trip again. As soon as I get my camera and computer in a chating mood or get the other pictures back I will get something uploaded to the web sight. boyd ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "George Thompson" <eagle1(at)commspeed.net>
Subject: Kolb KXP
Date: May 26, 2003
Dear Kolber's and Kolberets, I have listed my prime Kolb KXP for sale at a very choice price on www.barnstormers.com Look it up on May 23rd. It is priced way below even the kit price even less engine,paint, insterments, full enclousure etc. I assure all of you that it is a very well made aircraft,. I have flown it from Arizona back to Missouri and back with no problums. It has 275 hrs on its 503. It has always been hangered and is ready to go with a fresh tank of fuel. It is hangered in Arizona and WILL BE SOLD. George, Bald Eagle Of Arizona eagle1(at)commspeed.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net>
Subject: ultrastar
Date: May 27, 2003
anyone gone a fair distance in a ultrastar, any ideas on where to install some storage, not much, just for oil and tie-downs. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: wheels and rims
Date: May 27, 2003
Well Im to the point where I need to purchase some tires and rims for my Firefly gents. I'm looking for advice.. 6 or 8 inch?....will selsom see paved runways... I want to install Mountian bike cable operated discs, and I can machine my own adapters if I need to. I have been looking those 6 " Azusalite nylon....question is will they hold up?....but no 8 inch avail.... Will I be happy with 6 inch instead of nice fat 8" that will likely give me a little more cusion for bumpy feilds...or noy so perfect landings?....will 8 inch tires add so much weight I wont like em?...can I cover 8 inch with wheel pants?.....aARGHHHH....I'm ready to buy today but I just cant make up my mind.....Somebody MAKE me do something!!!! http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm Don Gherardini- FireFly 098 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Anderson" <janderson3(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: ultrastar
Date: May 27, 2003
for oil, tools (plug wrench, screw driver and pliers), and plugs I have used a small size duffle and velcro straps to tie it in front of my 5 gal tanks between my knees. A Buddy of mine, who won grand champion light plane with his US, flew his US to Oshkosh. He hand sewed a duffle that fit behind his head in the "V" for the cage support, this fit most of his camping gear. I have also heard of folks tying storage bags tighly up under the seat. You could also use something like 4" PVC tubing with screw ends. This could be attached in the same places mentioned above or on the outside of the landing gear legs(depending on the style of your legs). Make sure what ever you use is secure - don't want it flying through the prop. -JA ----- Original Message ----- From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net> Subject: Kolb-List: ultrastar > > anyone gone a fair distance in a ultrastar, any ideas on where to install some storage, not much, just for oil and tie-downs. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net>
Subject: Re: ultrastar
Date: May 28, 2003
thanks john, if you install something behind your head doesn't it mess with the airflow to the prop? asking cause I don't know? ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Anderson" <janderson3(at)nc.rr.com> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: ultrastar > > for oil, tools (plug wrench, screw driver and pliers), and plugs I have used > a small size duffle and velcro straps to tie it in front of my 5 gal tanks > between my knees. > > A Buddy of mine, who won grand champion light plane with his US, flew his US > to Oshkosh. He hand sewed a duffle that fit behind his head in the "V" for > the cage support, this fit most of his camping gear. > > I have also heard of folks tying storage bags tighly up under the seat. > > You could also use something like 4" PVC tubing with screw ends. This could > be attached in the same places mentioned above or on the outside of the > landing gear legs(depending on the style of your legs). > > Make sure what ever you use is secure - don't want it flying through the > prop. > > -JA > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net> > To: > Subject: Kolb-List: ultrastar > > > > > > anyone gone a fair distance in a ultrastar, any ideas on where to install > some storage, not much, just for oil and tie-downs. > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 27, 2003
From: Rick & Martha Neilsen <neilsenrm(at)comcast.net>
Subject: reflections
I agree high RPMs no matter how smooth get to me. If nothing else the sound of a high engine is more irritating. My VW doesn't run as smooth as a 912 but at 3200 RPM it just feels better and the sound is 300% better. I have never had a chance to ride a Harley so I have no idea how bad the vibrations might be from one of those V twins but they do sound sweet. Don't give up on looking for Rotax alternatives. There has to be something that is better and more REASONABLY PRICED. For now I'm enjoying my reduction drive VW. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIII -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Paul Petty Subject: Kolb-List: reflections Kolbers, As I reflect back on this weekend's trip to the factory, I often think of all the comments made about my HD project being a giant vibrator. Although my experience in the M3X was the best flying experience yet, the noise and vibration was overwhelming.... The high RPM the Rotax has to make to produce the power needed also transmits high vibration through out the airframe. Quite possibly the warp drive prop is part of the blame, not sure. At any rate after the demo ride I wonder... would my HD with it's ability to produce high torque at any RPM be smoother perhaps? Sure makes me want to complete a redrive and find out! The only turn off's on light sport aircraft to me is the feeling of flying a weed eater.... Today I was weed wacking my fence and as I was going along I couldn't help but to think of standing on the flight line at the ultralight section at Sun n Fun no phun intended... The ballistic wide open screaming of the 2 strokes as well as the 912 just is spooky to me. Call me what ever you wish, but I like raw bottom line horsepower... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Anderson" <janderson3(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: ultrastar
Date: May 27, 2003
Probably ANYPLACE you put it will disturb the airflow to the prop, just keep it as small as posible and as streamlined as posible. I have seen people put thier gas tanks behind thier head so that they had gravity feed. I don't think disturbing airflow is as important as CG, and you are only talking light weight so CG should not be a concern. ----- Original Message ----- From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: ultrastar > > thanks john, if you install something behind your head doesn't it mess with > the airflow to the prop? asking cause I don't know? > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Anderson" <janderson3(at)nc.rr.com> > To: > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: ultrastar > > > > > > for oil, tools (plug wrench, screw driver and pliers), and plugs I have > used > > a small size duffle and velcro straps to tie it in front of my 5 gal tanks > > between my knees. > > > > A Buddy of mine, who won grand champion light plane with his US, flew his > US > > to Oshkosh. He hand sewed a duffle that fit behind his head in the "V" > for > > the cage support, this fit most of his camping gear. > > > > I have also heard of folks tying storage bags tighly up under the seat. > > > > You could also use something like 4" PVC tubing with screw ends. This > could > > be attached in the same places mentioned above or on the outside of the > > landing gear legs(depending on the style of your legs). > > > > Make sure what ever you use is secure - don't want it flying through the > > prop. > > > > -JA > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net> > > To: > > Subject: Kolb-List: ultrastar > > > > > > > > > > anyone gone a fair distance in a ultrastar, any ideas on where to > install > > some storage, not much, just for oil and tie-downs. > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 28, 2003
From: dale seitzer <dalemseitzer(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb-List Digest: 8 Msgs - 05/27/03
I have seen Challenger builders who use 5 inch azuza and get (free) used front tires off Cessna 150/152/172. These tires are 6 ply and rated to 120 mph with a pretty big foot print and they are better balanced. They can be run at low air pressure and can handle lots of abuse. Definitely use high speed bearings--they will last longer and be quiet and smooth. Dale Seitzer > Well Im to the point where I need to purchase some > tires and rims for my > Firefly gents. I'm looking for advice.. > > 6 or 8 inch?....will selsom see paved runways... > > __________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Steuber" <esteuber(at)rochester.rr.com>
Subject: storage and wheels
Date: May 28, 2003
Ronnie, I think the only reasonable place for storage of a good amount of camping and maintenance items would be above the engine in the triangle area.....You could make a permanent or temporary storage area by using vinyl covered clamps that will attach to the tubing with no welding.. I had a 5 gallon plastic gas tank that fit in that area on my last Ultrastar that did not make any difference to propellar air or airspeed. I plan on using this area again on the new Ultrastar which will give me the option on trips of 11 gallons but still removable . Look in the photo share and you can see the plastic tank position on my old Ultrastar.. Don. Go with the 6 inch rims , tires and tubes. I only know about the aluminum and not the plastic. I did have considerable trouble with the Azusa wheels because of assembly problems concerning wobble. The only solution was to assenble everything on the axle and torque very carefully...never got it perfect but acceptable. Tracy Obrien brakes recquired a lot of screwing around to make acceptable......Although I do like the result . Good Luck Ed in Western NY ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bruce McElhoe" <mcelhoe(at)cvip.net>
Subject: Re: wheels and rims
Date: May 28, 2003
Don, We used 5-inch wheels and aircraft 5.00-5 tires, and made our weight limit. We searched around the airport and found the lightest (most worn out) tires. We only have about 15 hours on our FireFly, so this is hardly a good test. Our thinking is that aircraft tires have a stiffer sidewall so they are stable at very low pressure (4-5 psi). Also, we have puncture vines here that will put holes in a wheelbarrow tire. We put some light go-cart mechanical brakes on the airplane, and found them to be more than adequate. I find I rarely use the brakes. They are not necessary on roll-out, and we don't run-up the engine. If the brakes are too good you will simply nose over. Regards, Bruce McElhoe FireFly 88 Reedley, Calif. > > Well Im to the point where I need to purchase some tires and rims for my > Firefly gents. I'm looking for advice.. > > 6 or 8 inch?....will selsom see paved runways... > > I want to install Mountian bike cable operated discs, and I can machine my > own adapters if I need to. > > I have been looking those 6 " Azusalite nylon....question is will they hold > up?....but no 8 inch avail.... > > Will I be happy with 6 inch instead of nice fat 8" that will likely give me > a little more cusion for bumpy feilds...or noy so perfect landings?....will > 8 inch tires add so much weight I wont like em?...can I cover 8 inch with > wheel pants?.....aARGHHHH....I'm ready to buy today but I just cant make up > my mind.....Somebody MAKE me do something!!!! > > http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm > Don Gherardini- > FireFly 098 > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Johann G." <johann(at)gi.is>
Subject: Warp Drive Propeller
Date: May 28, 2003
Hello List members. I have a problem with a Warp Drive propeller, and I would like to ask you specialists on the list for advise. My friend is using the Warp Drive prop on his Firestar II. The engine is a Rotax 503. The problem is that the three blades are off track. No blade is the same, and the difference is about1/2. How do we adjust the tracking of the blades? Thank you in advance. Regards, Johann G. Iceland. http://www.gi.is/fis/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Johann G." <johann-g(at)talnet.is>
Subject: Warp Drive Propeller
Date: May 28, 2003
I noticed that the inch mark was missing from my first mail. It was supposed to be half-inch difference in each blade. Best regards, Johann G. Iceland. http://www.gi.is/fis/ -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Johann G. Subject: Kolb-List: Warp Drive Propeller Hello List members. I have a problem with a Warp Drive propeller, and I would like to ask you specialists on the list for advise. My friend is using the Warp Drive prop on his Firestar II. The engine is a Rotax 503. The problem is that the three blades are off track. No blade is the same, and the difference is about1/2. How do we adjust the tracking of the blades? Thank you in advance. Regards, Johann G. Iceland. http://www.gi.is/fis/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Beauford Tuton" <beauford(at)tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: Re: wheels and rims
Date: May 28, 2003
Don: I now run the 6 inch Azuzalite nylon on the FF... with the azuza internally expanding double shoe brakes... No problems at all with the wheels or the brakes... got about 75 hours on them running out of a sandy grass strip... After 20 hours, I removed the 5 inchers (Azuzalite nylon) with the low-profile tires that Kolb originally furnished, because they tended to hang in ruts and relatively small holes... no sweat with the 6 inchers... made a big difference... If you want to see what they look like on the Fly, will send you a snapshot. For what it's worth... Good luck, Beauford, Aluminum Butcher of Brandon FF #076 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net> Subject: Kolb-List: wheels and rims > > Well Im to the point where I need to purchase some tires and rims for my > Firefly gents. I'm looking for advice.. > > 6 or 8 inch?....will selsom see paved runways... > >> FireFly 098 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: wheels and rims
Date: May 28, 2003
Beauford....what size tires did you fit on those 6 inch nylon rims?..I can only find a spec that they are 3 inchs wide, and I dont know if they would work with a 6.00 x 6 inch airtrac???...or maybe there are wider azusalites that i have found.....?? http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm Don Gherardini- FireFly 098 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Beauford Tuton" <beauford(at)tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: Re: wheels and rims
Date: May 28, 2003
Don... They are 4.10 x 3.50 x 6... the same Chinee tires/tubes listed with the 6 inch Azuzalite wheels in the Spruce catalog as PN 06-03000.... they were $19.50 per side for the tire and tube as a set... IMHO, the standard general aviation 600x6 is way too heavy for the Fly.... and I doubt they would fit these toy wheels, anyway... I really do think that "lite" is the way to go on the Fly... and I have have dabbled these little 6 inch tires in some pretty crummy strips without problems... Worth what ye paid fer it... Beauford ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: wheels and rims > > Beauford....what size tires did you fit on those 6 inch nylon rims?..I can > only find a spec that they are 3 inchs wide, and I dont know if they would > work with a 6.00 x 6 inch airtrac???...or maybe there are wider azusalites > that i have found.....?? > > http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm > Don Gherardini- > FireFly 098 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: wheels and rims
Date: May 28, 2003
P.S. BeauFord.....what did ya make that gap seal out of? Don G ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "NBD" <mk3(at)bailinair.com>
Subject: Priming Cage
Date: May 28, 2003
A couple of questions concerning the priming of the fuselage cage, with my schedule this is apt to take at least a week. Is it recommended that the entire cage be stripped and cleaned prior to priming or in sections? i.e. strip & clean a section and prime. Using Stit's epoxy primer (white), will their be a problem applying paint after a period of time or should the finish coat be applied shortly after the primer has cured? Thank you Regards Noel Kolb MK III Classic New Hampshire http://www.bailinair.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 28, 2003
From: possums <possums(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: wheels and rims
How to change a flat without taking the tire off of the rim or the rim off the axle - in the field repair for punctured tubes. Just a suggestion for those that don't already know. First, you of course, have to prop up the wheel or wing and remove the wheel pant if you have one. Next - the tire is usually already broken lose from the rim if it's flat. We just cut the old tube in half and pull it out from inside the tire. Then push the new tube inside the tire with the valve in the right place. Pump it up and go. If you don't have a tube and have to go anyway, I have stuffed tires with rags, papers or my clothes - etc. Anything to get off the ground, especially if you're on a sandbar and the tide is coming in. It is always easier to land with a flat than to take off with a flat. Enquiring minds might want to know. > >Don... >. and I have have dabbled these >little 6 inch tires in some pretty crummy strips without problems... >Worth what ye paid fer it... >Beauford ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 28, 2003
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Priming Cage
> >A couple of questions concerning the priming of the fuselage cage, with my >schedule this is apt to take at least a week. > >Is it recommended that the entire cage be stripped and cleaned prior to >priming or in sections? i.e. strip & clean a section and prime. Nope, work fast, do it all at once, get it over with. That cleaner stuff is nasty on your hands, you don't want to extend the agony any more than necessary. >Using Stit's epoxy primer (white), will their be a problem applying paint >after a period of time or should the finish coat be applied shortly after >the primer has cured? Anytime is fine, maybe a little scuff sanding helps. >Thank you > >Regards >Noel >Kolb MK III Classic >New Hampshire >http://www.bailinair.com You're welcome Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: Priming Cage
Date: May 28, 2003
Yes Noel..like richard says..do it all at once....and do a good job...dont leave anything...any single spot not cleaned..and fer goodness sake..dont leave any spots not primed. I bought my kit second hand...the owner had just got started on it and passed away. he primed the cage with epoxy primer and a brush...didnt clean it well and didnt cover it real well with primer either.....6 months later when I bought it from his heirs....there was little streaks of rust showing thru in several spots. It took me several LONG days to strip that dang epoxy primer off and redo the whole thing...when it sticks...it sticks better than anything in the world, and dont come off easy. But where its not cleaned proper....its pitiful! http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm Don Gherardini- FireFly 098 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: Priming Cage
Date: May 28, 2003
One other thing Noel....good clean bare chrome-moly will rust in a matter of hours in the right weather...so if you cant get it all cleaned right away for some reason..(like I couldnt)...get a spray can of zinc-chromate primer, and shoot the bare metal you have cleaned.it dont take much..just a light coat...then when you are all done....epoxy the whole critter at once. http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm Don Gherardini- FireFly 098 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Steuber" <esteuber(at)rochester.rr.com>
Subject: warp drive prop
Date: May 29, 2003
Johann, Remove the prop and dissassemle . Lay the plates on a surface plate and make sure they are flat...if OK, then start mixing the blade holders with different ones and you should get changes. If that does not work you need to modify the blade holders by sanding suspected areas on the flats against the flat plates...it may take a while but can be done. .......try to get the blade track within 1/8 inch of each other...smoothes right out.. Ed in Western NY ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Steuber" <esteuber(at)rochester.rr.com>
Subject: Key West Regulator
Date: May 29, 2003
Gang, I have a problem with a Key West regulator used in parallel with a Westberg Tach operating off the lighting coil on my 2SI engine. The tach works fine till I put the Regulator on the 2 yellow coil wires. Key West says it is the regulator keeping the lighting coil from allowing the AC voltage to change....I do not have a charging coil on this engine to put the regulator on . Is there a regulator I can use without a battery that will work with my Tach ? I need a Cig Lighter Power plug to run a hanheld GPS and handheld radio otherwise I would just forget the regulator. I have a Tiny Tach that I am considering using but the panel is already cut for the Westberg..... Ed in Western NY ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Geoff Thistlethwaite" <geoffthis(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Key West Regulator
Date: May 29, 2003
Ed, check out: http://www.kestrobes.com/Powerx.html I used this on my firestar to power my radio and tape deck.... HTH Geoff Thistlethwaite ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Steuber" <esteuber(at)rochester.rr.com> Subject: Kolb-List: Key West Regulator > > Gang, > I have a problem with a Key West regulator used in parallel with a Westberg Tach operating off the lighting coil on my 2SI engine. The tach works fine till I put the Regulator on the 2 yellow coil wires. Key West says it is the regulator keeping the lighting coil from allowing the AC voltage to change....I do not have a charging coil on this engine to put the regulator on . Is there a regulator I can use without a battery that will work with my Tach ? I need a Cig Lighter Power plug to run a hanheld GPS and handheld radio otherwise I would just forget the regulator. I have a Tiny Tach that I am considering using but the panel is already cut for the Westberg..... > Ed in Western NY > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <gdledbetter1(at)fuse.net>
Subject: Re: wheels and rims
Date: May 29, 2003
Possum, You are always a source of incredible, useful information. I guess flying a Kolb submarine gives you extra insight. Gene Ledbetter Firefly - 193hrs Cincinnati -------------------------------------------------------- ........If you don't have a tube and have to go anyway, I have stuffed tires with rags, papers or my clothes - etc. Anything to get off the ground, especially if you're on a sandbar and the tide is coming in. It is always easier to land with a flat than to take off with a flat. Enquiring minds might want to know. Possums ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 29, 2003
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)airmail.net>
Subject: Re: Key West Regulator
That is because the KeyWest is a shunt-type regular which basically means it shorts the lighting coil to control the output voltage. Yep, that's the way it works. When it shorts, you loose tach signal or get a very erratic one. Do you have two sets of lighting coils on the 2Si, one for the ignition and one for accessory power? On a Rotax I would tell you to use the gray wire but don't know much about 2Si's ignition or electrical system. One fix is to go to one of those limited 3 amp output regulars. I suggest to Kuntzleman who manufacturers strobes and the hot box that he should design and sell a unit but he replies his hot box is the total solution but not if your want more than a few amps. Anybody got any help for this guy? jerb > >Gang, > I have a problem with a Key West regulator used in parallel with > a Westberg Tach operating off the lighting coil on my 2SI engine. The > tach works fine till I put the Regulator on the 2 yellow coil wires. Key > West says it is the regulator keeping the lighting coil from allowing the > AC voltage to change....I do not have a charging coil on this engine to > put the regulator on . Is there a regulator I can use without a battery > that will work with my Tach ? I need a Cig Lighter Power plug to run a > hanheld GPS and handheld radio otherwise I would just forget the > regulator. I have a Tiny Tach that I am considering using but the panel > is already cut for the Westberg..... > Ed in Western NY > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Beauford Tuton" <beauford(at)tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: Re: wheels and rims
Date: May 29, 2003
Don: Thankee for the kind words about the Fly.....nothing big has come off it yet, so I reckon it's so far, so good... I harbor a deep-seated intrinsic mistrust of aeronautics in general... it colors my perspective. Re your question: That gap seal is .028 aluminum sheet... put industrial strength one-inch velcro on the outboard edges... plus (because I don't totally trust velcro) I riveted four little aluminum angles, about 1.5 inches long and high, on the inside.... two on the top, two on the bottom... drilled holes in them to accept bungee cords... I carry the bungees around behind the top cage cross member to keep aft tension on the gap seal... so far it has shown no tendency to get loose from the velcro... I hated that factory stock cloth gap seal...never looked right... being white fabric on a greasy airplane, it gradually got dirty as a high school seniors' intentions....and it finally shredded out on me up at London... First thing (well, mebbe the third thing) I did when I got back was to make this aluminum one. I fold the Fly and stuff it into its homemade trailer every time it flies... The metal gap seal is no big deal for folding... adds maybe three minutes to the set-up and tear-down process... I like it a helluva lot better than the cloth... Best Regards, Beauford ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: wheels and rims > > P.S. BeauFord.....what did ya make that gap seal out of? > > Don G > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net>
Subject: Re: wheels and rims
Date: May 30, 2003
you have a picture, as my cloth one on my ultrastar needs replacing ----- Original Message ----- From: "Beauford Tuton" <beauford(at)tampabay.rr.com> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: wheels and rims > > Don: > Thankee for the kind words about the Fly.....nothing big has come off it > yet, so I reckon it's so far, so good... I harbor a deep-seated intrinsic > mistrust of aeronautics in general... it colors my perspective. > Re your question: That gap seal is .028 aluminum sheet... put industrial > strength one-inch velcro on the outboard edges... plus (because I don't > totally trust velcro) I riveted four little aluminum angles, about 1.5 > inches long and high, on the inside.... two on the top, two on the > bottom... drilled holes in them to accept bungee cords... I carry the > bungees around behind the top cage cross member to keep aft tension on the > gap seal... so far it has shown no tendency to get loose from the velcro... > > I hated that factory stock cloth gap seal...never looked right... being > white fabric on a greasy airplane, it gradually got dirty as a high school > seniors' intentions....and it finally shredded out on me up at London... > First thing (well, mebbe the third thing) I did when I got back was to make > this aluminum one. I fold the Fly and stuff it into its homemade trailer > every time it flies... The metal gap seal is no big deal for folding... > adds maybe three minutes to the set-up and tear-down process... I like it a > helluva lot better than the cloth... > > Best Regards, > Beauford > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net> > To: > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: wheels and rims > > <donghe@one-eleven.net> > > > > P.S. BeauFord.....what did ya make that gap seal out of? > > > > Don G > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 29, 2003
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Key West Regulator
Had a similar problem with my 532 using a Westberg tach & Key West regulator off the lighting coil. You don't have to use the charging coil, the lighting coil will work just as well. Swap the wires around. Swap the coil wires to the Key West terminals. If that doesn't work, try various coil/tach combinations. On mine, there was one combination of wires to regulator, wires to tach that would work right, all others didn't. Obviously there are several possible combinations, take notes or you'll get really frustrated. (Guess how I know this?) Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > >Gang, > I have a problem with a Key West regulator used in parallel with > a Westberg Tach operating off the lighting coil on my 2SI engine. The > tach works fine till I put the Regulator on the 2 yellow coil wires. Key > West says it is the regulator keeping the lighting coil from allowing the > AC voltage to change....I do not have a charging coil on this engine to > put the regulator on . Is there a regulator I can use without a battery > that will work with my Tach ? I need a Cig Lighter Power plug to run a > hanheld GPS and handheld radio otherwise I would just forget the > regulator. I have a Tiny Tach that I am considering using but the panel > is already cut for the Westberg..... > Ed in Western NY > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Re: Key West Regulator
Date: May 29, 2003
Ed, Kuntzleman has a unit called the (Radio power supply) that will power your GPS and radio without a battery, I use one on my 503 powered Loehle and am very happy with it. He also has pretty good tech support. Denny Rowe ----- Original Message ----- From: Ed Steuber <esteuber(at)rochester.rr.com> Subject: Kolb-List: Key West Regulator > > Gang, > I have a problem with a Key West regulator used in parallel with a Westberg Tach operating off the lighting coil on my 2SI engine. The tach works fine till I put the Regulator on the 2 yellow coil wires. Key West says it is the regulator keeping the lighting coil from allowing the AC voltage to change....I do not have a charging coil on this engine to put the regulator on . Is there a regulator I can use without a battery that will work with my Tach ? I need a Cig Lighter Power plug to run a hanheld GPS and handheld radio otherwise I would just forget the regulator. I have a Tiny Tach that I am considering using but the panel is already cut for the Westberg..... > Ed in Western NY > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 29, 2003
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)airmail.net>
Subject: Re: Key West Regulator
Your problem is due to the KeyWest regulator being a shunt-type. It is connected across the lighting coil, yellow wires on a Rotax, not sure what color they are on a 2Si. The way the regular works is it effectively shorts the lighting coil to control the rectified DC output voltage. That's the way it works. The problem is when it does this, your tach looses it signal also. Not sure if the 2Si has dual coils, one for the ignition and one for accessories like the Rotax, if so you might be able to connect the tach to the ignition power (lighting) coil and run the regulator on the other high Amp output lighting coil. You could also use one of the other type regulators but most are limited to a DC output load of 3 amps. I suggested to Kuntzleman that he consider designing and selling a higher output regulator, his solution was to use his "hot box" but if I recall right its still limited to about 3 amps. jerb > >Gang, > I have a problem with a Key West regulator used in parallel with > a Westberg Tach operating off the lighting coil on my 2SI engine. The > tach works fine till I put the Regulator on the 2 yellow coil wires. Key > West says it is the regulator keeping the lighting coil from allowing the > AC voltage to change....I do not have a charging coil on this engine to > put the regulator on . Is there a regulator I can use without a battery > that will work with my Tach ? I need a Cig Lighter Power plug to run a > hanheld GPS and handheld radio otherwise I would just forget the > regulator. I have a Tiny Tach that I am considering using but the panel > is already cut for the Westberg..... > Ed in Western NY > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 29, 2003
From: possums <possums(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: wheels and rims
Darn - you've got a lot of hours real quick. I guess you "Professional Retirees" can work that out. Are you and "Duane the Plane" still in Fla. > >Possum, > >You are always a source of incredible, useful information. I guess >flying a Kolb submarine >gives you extra insight. > >Gene Ledbetter >Firefly - 193hrs >==================================================================== ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: Key West Regulator
Date: May 29, 2003
Ed, I dont know which engine you have, but my ULII-02 Cuyuna has one coil. and I believe its the sames as the newer 2 cylinders....if you have one a those powerhouse 3 cylinders...then I sure dont know...But Roger Zerkle will, and here is his E-mail atr ZDE Zerkle, Roger E-mail Address(es): zde(at)frtci.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: wheels and rims
Date: May 29, 2003
Beauford, I like that idea on the Gap seal, and I believe Ill use it...thankyou! Got the Azuza wheels today....and they are just a tad too wide to fit the little .063 chromoly axle stub....which doesnt dissapoint be to awful bad...cause I just didnt think much a those axle fittings. They seemed awful flimsy and didnt fit the gear leg well either...too wobbley on the leg to suit me.,, .0875 leg and a .090 hole in the fitting....so I spun out a new one on the lathe today much better and will do the other one tomorrow, and weld on axle stubs a tad longer..and just a tad heavier. http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm Don Gherardini- FireFly 098 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Steuber" <esteuber(at)rochester.rr.com>
Subject: Key West regulator
Date: May 30, 2003
Gang, Ask a question on this list and you get the answer ....Thanks to all....I ordered the KE power supply yesterday.The 2SI has only one coil and I think this is the only option....unless I use a Tiny Tach or feed batteries to my GPS and radio......I sure could buy a lot of batteries for what that little box costs.... Thanks, Ed in Western NY ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 30, 2003
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)airmail.net>
Subject: Re: storage and wheels
Ed, Surprised you encountered so much difficultly with the Tracy O'Brien brakes. They were a snap putting on my friends Hawk. He has the Azusa plastic wheels. They work great. He can drag the wheels locked at full power. jerb > >Ronnie, > I think the only reasonable place for storage of a good amount > of camping and maintenance items would be above the engine in the > triangle area.....You could make a permanent or temporary storage area by > using vinyl covered clamps that will attach to the tubing with no > welding.. I had a 5 gallon plastic gas tank that fit in that area on my > last Ultrastar that did not make any difference to propellar air or > airspeed. I plan on using this area again on the new Ultrastar which will > give me the option on trips of 11 gallons but still removable . Look in > the photo share and you can see the plastic tank position on my old > Ultrastar.. > > Don. > Go with the 6 inch rims , tires and tubes. I only know about the > aluminum and not the plastic. I did have considerable trouble with the > Azusa wheels because of assembly problems concerning wobble. The only > solution was to assenble everything on the axle and torque very > carefully...never got it perfect but acceptable. Tracy Obrien brakes > recquired a lot of screwing around to make acceptable......Although I do > like the result . Good Luck > >Ed in Western NY > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 30, 2003
From: John Raeburn <raeburn(at)snowhill.com>
Subject: John Hauck's e-mail address
Does anyone know John Hauck's e-mail address? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 30, 2003
From: John Raeburn <raeburn(at)snowhill.com>
Subject: John Haucks e-mail address?
Hi, does anyone know John Hauck's e-mail address? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 31, 2003
From: "Bob N." <ronoy(at)shentel.net>
Subject: Re: List Down?
Think mine auto-deleted. Bob N. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 31, 2003
From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Flight Complete
Hi Ya'll: I returned to Gantt International Airport about I have scanned most of the Kolb emails and must add my own short comments at this time that the Kolb "get-together" at Monument Valley, Utah, was by far the most successful, enjoyable, satisfying, complete, and most interesting flyin I have attended since starting this hobby in 1983, almost 20 years ago. Nuther words, we had a ball. Was much like old friends getting back together after a long absence. MV was the place to have the gathering, although it was halfway round the world from Abalama. I am more than willing to spend a couple days flying or driving to get back there next year for another one. Off the top of my head: I flew 70.5 hrs. Burned 350 gals fuel. No oil (although I thought I had during the first couple days of the flight). Was "on the road" 15 days, as the Army would count them, or 16 days, as civilians would count. Spent an afternoon in Marietta, Oklahoma, on the ground because of a 30 mph direct headwind. When my ground speed gets below 60 mph and it is turbulent, I land and take a nap. Spent two nights and a day at Terrell County International Airport, between Sanderson and Dryden, Texas, because of severe thunderstorms and extremely heavy rain. I was responsible for flooding on the high plateau in the West Texas Desert. Water was ankle deep, and six inches up the main tires of Miss P'fer. Several of the thunderstorms were complete whiteouts. Never dreamed I would see anything like this in that local. I came through Terrell County AP on my 1994 flight around the country and to Alaska. Tied down in the same old T Hanger to get out of the sun then, but this time to get out of the rain and possible hail. On the way into Marfa, halfway between El Paso and Terrell County AP, I danced with the dust devils and did my best to outrun an enormous thunderstorm that was playing "cat and mouse" with me". When I felt cold air and a thump, looked over my left shoulder and saw the black cloud try to envelope me from the rear, then flank me on the left, I ran for 20 miles to Marfa, WOT and riding a bucking bronc on the edge of the storm. On top of that I had a full bladder, so the effort to arrive Marfa soonest was two fold. :-) When I get a chance, I will sit down and share my flight with you all. It ranks up there as one of the finest I have had since I started cross countrying ultralights and light planes 19 years ago. I must say that Miss P'fer and the 912S (now with 490.8 hours) performed impeccably. For an old home built experimental that came out of my basement nearly 12 years ago, she is without a doubt the best aircraft I have ever flown being pushed by the best recip engine I have ever flown in front of or behind, for that matter. I know the crusade for a better, cheaper, more reliable, and fuel efficient power plant for our little airplanes goes on, but you will not find a better engine than the 912 or 912S at any price. When one finds himself and his airplane over the Sierra Nevada Rockies at 14,500 feet, with the top of the highest mountain less than 600 feet under the main landing gear, a couple extra dollars for something that works is the least of my worries. I am not sponsored by Rotax, but I sure wish I was. I have done a lot of PR work for them whether I wanted to or not. They have a good product in the 912 series engines. My previous altitude record was 13,500 feet with the 912 over flat and nearly sea level ground level above Illinois or Indiana some years ago on the way home from Oshkosh. I decided I was high enough when I got cold as Hell dressed in shorts and T shirt. Dress the same way, OAT 28F, I was comfortable in Miss P'fers cabin heated to a lovely 70F by a beautiful CAVU sky and warm sun on the lexan. WHAT A FLIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!! I still have not unpacked all the bags and put up my gear from the flight. It is piled in the kitchen and living room of my old lake cabin I call home. It is good to be back, I miss the "gypsie" life of light plane cross countrying, but it is always good to get back home. Will take a few days to get back in the groove and overcome post flight depression and the let down after having such an exciting and enjoyable flight. Take care, john h PS: Anybody heard from John Williamson? Has he returned from his flight to Washington State? I was going to call his wife and check on him during my flight, but discovered I did not have his home phone in my "little black book" of phone numbers I have collected from all over the US, Canada, and Alaska. PSS: I am tired and have not taken the extra time to proof what I have typed. If I have made typos, gramatical errors, misspelled words, etc., please correct if you wish. :-) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Williamson" <kolbrapilot(at)attbi.com>
Subject: My latest trip
Date: May 31, 2003
Fellow Kolbers, I returned home last evening and have been catching up on everything today. The trip went very well and I met some of the nicest people in the world. The gathering at Monument Valley was the high point of the trip. You just can't find better people than those that fly or build Kolb aircraft. Here are the stats for my trip: Distance flown: 4696.9 nm, 5405.1 sm Flight time: 68 hours 25 minutes Average speed: 68.6 knots, 78.4 mph Fuel burned: 299.8 gallons Landings: 54 States landed in: 17 Lowest airport elevation: 210 feet below sea level Highest altitude flown: 11,000 feet msl Rides given to relatives: 23 Here are some links to some of the pictures I was able to take. More will be posted to my website in the next couple of days. I have looked at all the other photos posted of the Monument Valley trip and just had to add few to the growing list. http://home.attbi.com/~KolbraPilot3/KUIL/100_0366.JPG http://home.attbi.com/~KolbraPilot3/KUIL/100_0370.JPG http://home.attbi.com/~KolbraPilot3/KUIL/100_0373.JPG http://home.attbi.com/~KolbraPilot3/KUIL/100_0374.JPG http://home.attbi.com/~KolbraPilot3/KUIL/100_0387.JPG http://home.attbi.com/~KolbraPilot3/KUIL/100_0408.JPG http://home.attbi.com/~KolbraPilot3/KUIL/100_0420.JPG http://home.attbi.com/~KolbraPilot3/KUIL/100_0435.JPG http://home.attbi.com/~KolbraPilot3/KUIL/100_0448.JPG http://home.attbi.com/~KolbraPilot3/KUIL/100_0455.JPG http://home.attbi.com/~KolbraPilot3/KUIL/100_0473.JPG http://home.attbi.com/~KolbraPilot3/KUIL/100_0609.JPG http://home.attbi.com/~KolbraPilot3/KUIL/100_0631.JPG John Williamson Arlington, TX Kolb Kolbra, N49KK, Jabiru 2200, 327 hours http://home.attbi.com/~kolbrapilot ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 31, 2003
From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: My latest trip
Hi John W/Gang: Great to hear you are home safely and had a good flight. I enjoyed the pics you posted and can not wait to see the others when you get them on your web site. I took 13 rolls of 35mm, 24 and some 36 exposures, during my flight. They are still in zip lock bags in red stuff sacks that have not been unloaded yet. I will try and get them in the shop tonight. Should get them back in a few days. Will also have them make up CDs so I can post on my index page for you all to see. I still have not gotten around to captioning the pics I made on my last Alaska flight, so don't expect any different on this flight. However, I will do my best. :-) As soon as I get the grass cut here at the house, at the airstrip, and a myriad of other chores that have been waiting for my return. The life of a bachelor is rough with no one to split the inside and outside chores with.......... These are John W's stats and I will post mine next to his for comparison. While we were at MV we had a chance to catch up on a lot of history for the past 35 years since we graduated from Army Rotary Wing Flight School. John was a couple classes and about a month behind me in flight school, AH-1G Transition Course, and arriving in VN. We discovered that we both use 65 kts or 75 mph ground speed to plan for our civilian flights in our Kolbs, and that we both usually come very close to that figure when the flight is complete. My 1994 flight was 17,400 miles long, I averaged 78 mph for the duration of the flight. Let me add, my figures are approximate, based on time off the hour meter. When I get time I will get actual distances, add up my gas burn, etc. > Distance flown: 4696.9 nm, 5405.1 sm 5287.5 sm > Flight time: 68 hours 25 minutes 70.5 hours > Average speed: 68.6 knots, 78.4 mph 75 mph (estimate) > Fuel burned: 299.8 gallons 350 gal bases on 5 gph X 70.5 hours > Landings: 54 Get those when I add up my log book numbers. > States landed in: 17 10 (Based on a quick count on my fingers and limited memory.) > Lowest airport elevation: 210 feet below sea level 211 feet below sea level at Furnace Creek, Death Valley, California. Probably same airport John W. landed. Sectional indicated 210, sign at Furnace Creek Airport indicated 211. > Highest altitude flown: 11,000 feet msl 14,500 feet msl > Rides given to relatives: 23 None, but did give Ziggy from El Paso, Larry Bourne, and two kids, 7 and 10 yrs old, a ride. It is surprising how close the stats are on the two flights, though one originated and terminated in Arlington, Texas, and the other in Titus, Alabama. Proud to say John W flies his cross country flights much the same as I do, roughing it, living with the airplane. Only way to go! Congratulations on your successful flight John W. john h PS: We'll have to compare notes soon. Bet we were not more than a day apart at Furnace Creek, Death Valley, California. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 31, 2003
From: KRISTINA L GIBFRIED <tk1991(at)swbell.net>
Subject: Cutting 1/2" Plate
Due to the expense of spring landing gears I decided to make my own. My plans call for .5 x 4 x 72" with a taper starting 11.5" from centerline. I already had the bar cut to length, but have to cut the taper, 4 cuts. I put a cut off blade in a table saw and spent 15 minutes of chips burning my face for one cut. I even stopped short as the cut off was a perfect spear head and I could imagine it being kicked back by the blade and right through me. Does anyone have a beter way to make this cut in my garage with basic tools? Regards, Tim ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Re: Cutting 1/2" Plate
Date: May 31, 2003
You're absolutely right - I've seen saws kick the material back hard enuf to go thru a wall. I think I'd find me a cutting torch, then grind the edges smooth. Can you send me some pics and description of what you're doing, off List ?? I'm looking at a different route, with the same type of end result in mind. Lar. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Kolb Mk III - Vamoose N78LB www.gogittum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "KRISTINA L GIBFRIED" <tk1991(at)swbell.net> Subject: Kolb-List: Cutting 1/2" Plate > > > Due to the expense of spring landing gears I decided to make my own. My plans call for .5 x 4 x 72" with a taper starting 11.5" from centerline. I already had the bar cut to length, but have to cut the taper, 4 cuts. I put a cut off blade in a table saw and spent 15 minutes of chips burning my face for one cut. I even stopped short as the cut off was a perfect spear head and I could imagine it being kicked back by the blade and right through me. Does anyone have a beter way to make this cut in my garage with basic tools? > > Regards, > > Tim > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Re: Cutting 1/2" Plate
Date: May 31, 2003
Should've mentioned - if you clamp a straight edge of angle iron along the length of your cut, and use it to brace the torch's tip, you can make a very smooth cut with a torch, and have minimal grinding afterwards. Lar. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Kolb Mk III - Vamoose N78LB www.gogittum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Cutting 1/2" Plate > > You're absolutely right - I've seen saws kick the material back hard enuf to > go thru a wall. I think I'd find me a cutting torch, then grind the edges > smooth. Can you send me some pics and description of what you're doing, off > List ?? I'm looking at a different route, with the same type of end result > in mind. Lar. > > Larry Bourne > Palm Springs, CA > Kolb Mk III - Vamoose N78LB > www.gogittum.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "KRISTINA L GIBFRIED" <tk1991(at)swbell.net> > To: > Subject: Kolb-List: Cutting 1/2" Plate > > > > > > > > Due to the expense of spring landing gears I decided to make my own. My > plans call for .5 x 4 x 72" with a taper starting 11.5" from centerline. I > already had the bar cut to length, but have to cut the taper, 4 cuts. I put > a cut off blade in a table saw and spent 15 minutes of chips burning my face > for one cut. I even stopped short as the cut off was a perfect spear head > and I could imagine it being kicked back by the blade and right through me. > Does anyone have a beter way to make this cut in my garage with basic tools? > > > > Regards, > > > > Tim > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ian Heritch" <iheritch(at)satx.rr.com>
Subject: Swing the Compass
Date: May 31, 2003
Friends, the instructions with my new adjustable compass (Pegasus PG2A) state that prior to adjusting I should "swing the compass". Of course they don't explain how to swing the compass. So, is it as simple as rotating the aircraft on the ground one or more times in one direction, and then rotating it again one or more times in the opposite direction? Please advise. Ian Heritch San Antonio, TX Slingshot, 912 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 31, 2003
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Swing the Compass
Boy, this is soooo tempting...but...I'll pass. Beauford? Grey Baron? Would'st care to have a go? (Be patient Ian, & we'll tell you all about it... Snarf, chortle, ROTFL) Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > >Friends, the instructions with my new adjustable compass (Pegasus PG2A) >state that prior to adjusting I should "swing the compass". Of course >they don't explain how to swing the compass. > >So, is it as simple as rotating the aircraft on the ground one or more >times in one direction, and then rotating it again one or more times in >the opposite direction? > >Please advise. > >Ian Heritch >San Antonio, TX Slingshot, 912 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 01, 2003
From: "Bob N." <ronoy(at)shentel.net>
Subject: Re: Swing the Compass
It's midnight here and my keeper will shut me down err long. Tomorrow I'll expound on swinging vs. boxing--and maybe even say a word(s) or two about compasses. my carriage awaits Bob N. http://www.angelfire.com/rpg/ronoy/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: Cutting 1/2" Plate
Date: Jun 01, 2003
Jeez Tim.....If I understand ya,,,you are trying to make a 4 inch deep cut...an edge wise on that 1/2 x4...whew....dont use a torch...you wont have spring steel when ya get done...just a piece of hot-rolled flat. Thats gonna take a serious grinding job or a awful good plasma cutter.....not a small one either. Dont know what you have in the garage,,....but thats a heavy duty cut...more than alot of small welding shops might attempt with any accuracy. Try a good size machine shop. http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm Don Gherardini- FireFly 098 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Beauford Tuton" <beauford(at)tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Swing the Compass
Date: Jun 01, 2003
Ian: Swinging a compass is a tedious, but necessary little process that generates the compass deviation card and cranks most, if not all, of the apparent error out of the compass ... There is an excellent, very detailed, article by Tony Bingelis on how to do it available on the EAA homebuilder's website... it is a reprint of a Sport Aviation article from 1996....suggest you hit that site and take a look at it. Appropriately enough, it is entitled "Swinging the Compass..." I watched some guys do this to a Cherokee using GPS about 3 weeks ago... first time I saw GPS used in the process.... worked pretty well... We always used the old compass rose painted on the ramp... Good Luck... Beauford ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Heritch" <iheritch(at)satx.rr.com> Subject: Kolb-List: Swing the Compass > > Friends, the instructions with my new adjustable compass (Pegasus PG2A) state that prior to adjusting I should "swing the compass". Of course they don't explain how to swing the compass. > > So, is it as simple as rotating the aircraft on the ground one or more times in one direction, and then rotating it again one or more times in the opposite direction? > > Please advise. > > Ian Heritch > San Antonio, TX Slingshot, 912 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 01, 2003
From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Texoma Ultralight Gathering
> I plan on being there on Saturday the 7th of June. If any one is interested > in the Kolbra, come at look at it. > > John Williamson John W/Kolbers: After I read John's msg, I clicked on his web site to see if he had posted any recent pics. For some reason I checked his flight to Sun and Fun and Key West. Was reading through and clicking on photos in his narrative of the flight. Low and behold, John spent the night in Crystal Springs, Mississippi, I believe (without going back to check) on his last night out. I can confirm his statement that there was nothing at the airport. I spent the last night of my MV flight at, you guessed it, Crystal Springs, MS, Airport. Had messed around a little in the Vidalia, LA, and Natchez, MS, area looking for and finding an ultralight airstrip depicted on the Sectional. Turned out to be a good airstrip, but not used for ULs in many years. After fuel at Natchez, I decided to push on even though sun set was fast approaching. The airport was supposed to be lighted, but that is no guarantee. As I approached the little town of Crystal Springs, I still had not been able to pick out the beacon (which it did not have) or the runway lights. Once on a return flight from Oshkosh I had gambled on getting into a small airport in Kentucky after dark. Could not get the runway lights to come up on arrival. Airport surrounded by lights that ruined my night vision. Was not willing to gamble on a landing with just my single landing light when I could not see the field. A couple miles from Crystal Springs I did pick out the runway lights and shot my approach into a dead and abandoned airfield. No telephone or humans around the area. Luckily, my cell phone worked in the middle of nowhere. I was able to contact Nell and let her know where I was. As I was chowing down on my MRE a 4 wheel drive pickup with more lights than a 747 came down the little pig trail and proceeded to blind me. I made a slight angry gesture. He turned around and did not come back. Luckily I had fuel for the remainder of the flight. I slept on the tarmac under the wing without any intruders to my space. Left Friday morning at 0630 to discover that Paul Petty's family compound and grass strip were only 30 or 40 miles away, right on my course line. Was hard to roust everybody out of bed, but I did. Got my three cups of Louisiana coffee in Mississippi. The jolt was enough to get me the 200 miles or so to Gantt IAP and home. Sorry about getting so wordy, but I did............. :-) Happy Sunday morning, john h PS: Got my 12 rolls of film in the shop last night. Will get them out Wednesday evening with prints and CDs. Should have them on my index page Wed night. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Johann G." <johann(at)gi.is>
Subject: Mark III late off ground.
Date: Jun 01, 2003
Hi list members. My friend here in Iceland is having some difficulties with his Mark III. When in the take off roll, the plane wants to stay on the ground even though the speed is sufficient for take off. The weight of balance is correct and the wing dihedral is set according to the drawings. He is using the Rotax 912 UL engine with IVO three blade prop. He had not installed any kind of trim on the plane. Does anyone on the list have the same experience with his Mark III? Is the engine thrust line too low, i.e. wants to push the plane down and hold it on the ground? Could the wing angle of incidence be too low? Or the horizontal stabilizer be positioned incorrectly? Take a look at my friends plane. It is the yellow one. http://www.gi.is/fis/misc.htm Any help would be appreciated. Best regards, Johann G. Iceland. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 01, 2003
From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Mark III late off ground.
Johann/Gang: Tell your friend to come back off the power a little once he reaches flying speed, say 50 mph. Could be high thrust line and high power causing the airplane not to want to fly off the ground. I experienced this with the 912S on my first take off. Other tricks to fool it into flying are: Let the tail rise pretty high through flying speed then try to rotate. Sometimes rolling the airplane up on one main with ailerons near flying speed will encourage it to take off and fly. If it was mine, I would shorten the tail wheel strut to aprx'ly 5 or 6 inches showing between the tail wheel strut socket and the tail wheel assembly. This will get the tail a little lower and put a little more incidence in the wings. If the above does not work, then I would recommend putting it into a nice three point stance like old Miss P'fer. Let me know what happens, please. john h ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 01, 2003
From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Replies
Folks: If you have sent me an email and I haven't replied it is because I have not waded deep enough into this little mountain of mail that was waiting on me when I got home, over 3,000 emails. The folks on the SF List were supposed to put me TDY while on the MV Flight, but the wires got crossed and Brother Jim was put on TDY and I kept on getting the normal daily flood of mail while away. I am working my way through it little by little. :-) john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Harris" <rharris@magnolia-net.com>
Subject: Re: Mark III late off ground.
Date: Jun 01, 2003
Johann, Its real hard to tell much about the set up of your friend's MK3 from the photos. However when I was building my MK3 ( with a 912) the old Kolb Company told me to raise the front of the engine about 3/4" to get the thrust line lower. Since that time I have talk to folks that know a great deal about Kolbs. The general consensus seems to be to have the prop perpendicular to the trailing edge of the wing. Hope this helps.. Richard Harris MK3 N912RH Lewisville, Arkansas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Johann G." <johann(at)gi.is> Subject: Kolb-List: Mark III late off ground. > > Hi list members. > > My friend here in Iceland is having some difficulties with his Mark III. > When in the take off roll, the plane wants to stay on the ground even though > the speed is sufficient for take off. > The weight of balance is correct and the wing dihedral is set according to > the drawings. > He is using the Rotax 912 UL engine with IVO three blade prop. He had not > installed any kind of trim on the plane. > > Does anyone on the list have the same experience with his Mark III? > Is the engine thrust line too low, i.e. wants to push the plane down and > hold it on the ground? > Could the wing angle of incidence be too low? Or the horizontal stabilizer > be positioned incorrectly? > > Take a look at my friends plane. It is the yellow one. > http://www.gi.is/fis/misc.htm > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Best regards, > > Johann G. > Iceland. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 01, 2003
From: "Bob N." <ronoy(at)shentel.net>
Subject: Re: Swing the Compass
OK I'm back from Honey-Do City. Swinging the mag compass in an Ultralight should be easy, especially if you can corral a helper. But first a word on installation/location. Anything magnetic affects the compass. Being as how Kolbs have a lot of steel it is difficult to find a low-magnetic location that is viewable. [funny story later] First the reason it's easy is that you must align the vehicle's physical heading (using the boom tube, for instance) with magnetic North. If you are on an arpt with a compass rose, position the UL on the rose, with the tail in approx. flying position. If it's windy, or the UL is wobbling, wait a bit for calmer conditions. Helpful if you have a tail stand/old box/etc to rest the tail on. If you were working with a larger SpamCan it would be a lot more difficult with the tail situation. If you have an electrical system, turn on those items that are usually on in flight. (Other loads such as Transmit, landing lights, etc. will affect the compass, but only when on). Depending upon the engine installed, RPMs should be fast enough to show some charging current. With all the foregoing, ck the compass reading for 360 degrees; using a non-mag (brass or fiber) screwdriver set compass to 360, using the N/S adj. Turn around heading mag South on the rose, and take out One Half the error, using N/S adj. Now turn UL to mag 270 and take out One Half the error, using the E/W adj. Now go to mag 90, repeating the above. And then go back and do it again, taking out even smaller bites of error. See how a UL is much easier to swing than a C182, or even a 150? After the second or third iteration, check the compass at 30 degree headings (or even 45s) and write down the mag rose headings vs the mag compass headings. Make a teeny card and slip into frame under compass face--if available. What you've done is to make a Table of compass deviation--more later. And just for info, turn on some current hogs, like Transmit, heated vest/gloves/boots/etc and note approximate changes. Now you almost done, except for being able to Stand Up Straight, AvCad and give me the two mnemonic covering compasses! Sir: Can Dead Men Vote Twice, and True Virgins Make Dull Company. Compass +/-Deviation=Magnetic +/-Variation=True. And True +/- Variation=Magnetic +/-Deviation=Compass You get the value of Variation right from the sectional(s) covering your route. And that's the way it was in'42. Oh, the funny? I was ferrying a 172 from CA to east coast in August. I'd come down the hill from Walsenburg and on to Lamar. Had a couple frozen 7UPs on board. Filed IFR for the run to Dodge City. Enroute controllers were good, giving some needed steers around big cell. So being bone dry, got a can open without spraying entire cabin, took a drink of ice and foam, set the can on the glare shield, and motored on. Center comes on, saying I'm almost 10 deg off centerline and getting worse. Gave me vector to intercept course. Later after a couple more slugs of ice---and a knuckle rap from Center I figure that the steel 7UP can shouldn't be on the glare shield, right beside the compass! Bob N. http://www.angelfire.com/rpg/ronoy/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 01, 2003
From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Swing the Compass
> Swinging the mag compass in an Ultralight should be easy, especially if > Bob N. Bob N/Gang: Great explanation from an experienced aviator that goes back a number of years. How's that sound? Started to call you an old fart, which you would understand coming from me, but was afraid some of the other Kolbers might take offense to something that comes naturally. :-) Anyhow, let me add one thing I learned by accident while swinging the compass on my Firestar many years ago. In addition to everything that the Grey Baron explained insure your control stick (made of steel) is also in the cruise position of flight when you swing the compass. I did not do that for a long time, then one day when I was swinging a new compass I pulled the stick back and got a big swing in the compass indication. Yep, when it was relaxed on the ground and forward, closer to the compass, it was greatly affecting its accuracy. Nuff said, john h PS: Just got back from my first flight since I landed back home Friday morning. Boy does that MK III climb now that it is empty. Well, all except the 7 MRE's in the nose I forgot to take out when I unloaded. Last light flight was smooth and very enjoyable. Got to fly with my buddies who were all out and about doing the aviating thing this Sunday evening. Life is great at those times, and in the morning when I get up to a new day. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 01, 2003
Subject: [ Woody ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Woody Subject: Thunderbird http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/duesouth@govital.net.06.01.2003/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 01, 2003
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)airmail.net>
Subject: Re: Mark III late off ground.
A few things quickly come to mind. Assuming the wings incidence is correct, (should be checked in the normal flying attitude as per the building manual), is the plane tail coming up OK? Is the tail wheel assembly and/or gear legs standard so the proper "stance" is obtained - a taller tail wheel or longer tail spring can raise the tail or shorter gears legs lower the nose to decrease the wings angle of attack. Is the tail horizontal stabilizer incidence set correctly? Does the elevator have adequate up movement (that is the rear tip of the elevator swinging upward when the stick is pulled back) - needs to be rechecked. If the tail is coming up, the plane sticks to the ground, the engine thrust line may not be set correctly where it pushes the nose down with enough force to over come the lift generated by the wing at the takeoff speed. Front of the engine relative to the rear may be to low, may require removing shims from the rear and adding shims to the front to raise the front of the engine. Have you performed a static ground run on the engine with the tail tied down to verify the prop has been adjusted to properly load the engine? Are you getting the speed required on take off roll, and how long is it taking to reach it? Are the prop blades installed in the correct from/back orientation? It may be possible you have set some pitch in them (twisted them backwards) to load the engine and produce some thrust but is may not be adequate to bite the air. Last, are the brakes dragging? Regards, jerb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 01, 2003
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)airmail.net>
Subject: Re: Mark III late off ground.
Relative to the top surface or bottom surface? > >Johann, Its real hard to tell much about the set up of your friend's MK3 >from the photos. However when I was building my MK3 ( with a 912) the old >Kolb Company told me to raise the front of the engine about 3/4" to get the >thrust line lower. Since that time I have talk to folks that know a great >deal about Kolbs. The general consensus seems to be to have the prop >perpendicular to the trailing edge of the wing. > > Hope this helps.. > > >Richard Harris >MK3 N912RH >Lewisville, Arkansas >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Johann G." <johann(at)gi.is> >To: >Subject: Kolb-List: Mark III late off ground. > > > > > > Hi list members. > > > > My friend here in Iceland is having some difficulties with his Mark III. > > When in the take off roll, the plane wants to stay on the ground even >though > > the speed is sufficient for take off. > > The weight of balance is correct and the wing dihedral is set according to > > the drawings. > > He is using the Rotax 912 UL engine with IVO three blade prop. He had not > > installed any kind of trim on the plane. > > > > Does anyone on the list have the same experience with his Mark III? > > Is the engine thrust line too low, i.e. wants to push the plane down and > > hold it on the ground? > > Could the wing angle of incidence be too low? Or the horizontal stabilizer > > be positioned incorrectly? > > > > Take a look at my friends plane. It is the yellow one. > > http://www.gi.is/fis/misc.htm > > > > Any help would be appreciated. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Johann G. > > Iceland. > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 02, 2003
From: Rick & Martha Neilsen <neilsenrm(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Mark III late off ground.
My MKIII flies best with the thrust line set a few degrees up from even with the bottom of the wing. This puts the thrust line straight back in normal flight. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIII -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of jerb Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Mark III late off ground. Relative to the top surface or bottom surface? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "dama" <dama(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Builders and Flyers
Date: Jun 02, 2003
For those unaware, click below for a database of Kolb builders and flyers. Feel free to send any updates also. Kip Firestar II Atlanta http://www.springeraviation.net/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
, "Jay R Swager" , "earl lafean"
Subject: N616DR Airworthy
Date: Jun 02, 2003
Friends and neighbors, Hallaluja!!!!. Denny Rowe Kolb Mk-3-90-DR3 N616DR, 2SI 690L-70, Powerfin F model three blade, 2.65 to 1 reduction, Gull wing doors, full enclosure, 475 pounds. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: SR3SA2L1(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 02, 2003
Subject: Re: Conversion
Maybe all of you guys that have done conversions of X Kolb to a Y Kolb (Firestar to a Firestar 2 etc.) can archive what you did and learned for future generations under a "conversions" category? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rayfield, Bill" <brayfield(at)kcc.com>
Subject: N616DR Airworthy
Date: Jun 02, 2003
475 lbs ! With a 690 ! Man you build light. That thing oughta really climb! -----Original Message----- From: rowedl(at)highstream.net [mailto:rowedl(at)highstream.net] lafean Subject: Kolb-List: N616DR Airworthy Friends and neighbors, Hallaluja!!!!. Denny Rowe Kolb Mk-3-90-DR3 N616DR, 2SI 690L-70, Powerfin F model three blade, 2.65 to 1 reduction, Gull wing doors, full enclosure, 475 pounds. This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from disclosure under law. If you have received this message in error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. Thank you. ============================================================================== ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Harris" <rharris@magnolia-net.com>
Subject: Re: Mark III late off ground.
Date: Jun 02, 2003
That would be the bottom surface... Richard Harris MK3 N912RH Lewisville, Arkansas ----- Original Message ----- From: "jerb" <ulflyer(at)airmail.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Mark III late off ground. > > Relative to the top surface or bottom surface? > <rharris@magnolia-net.com> > > > >Johann, Its real hard to tell much about the set up of your friend's MK3 > >from the photos. However when I was building my MK3 ( with a 912) the old > >Kolb Company told me to raise the front of the engine about 3/4" to get the > >thrust line lower. Since that time I have talk to folks that know a great > >deal about Kolbs. The general consensus seems to be to have the prop > >perpendicular to the trailing edge of the wing. > > > > Hope this helps.. > > > > > >Richard Harris > >MK3 N912RH > >Lewisville, Arkansas > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Johann G." <johann(at)gi.is> > >To: > >Subject: Kolb-List: Mark III late off ground. > > > > > > > > > > Hi list members. > > > > > > My friend here in Iceland is having some difficulties with his Mark III. > > > When in the take off roll, the plane wants to stay on the ground even > >though > > > the speed is sufficient for take off. > > > The weight of balance is correct and the wing dihedral is set according to > > > the drawings. > > > He is using the Rotax 912 UL engine with IVO three blade prop. He had not > > > installed any kind of trim on the plane. > > > > > > Does anyone on the list have the same experience with his Mark III? > > > Is the engine thrust line too low, i.e. wants to push the plane down and > > > hold it on the ground? > > > Could the wing angle of incidence be too low? Or the horizontal stabilizer > > > be positioned incorrectly? > > > > > > Take a look at my friends plane. It is the yellow one. > > > http://www.gi.is/fis/misc.htm > > > > > > Any help would be appreciated. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Johann G. > > > Iceland. > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 02, 2003
From: Duncan McBride <duncanmcbride(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: N616DR Airworthy
Well done, Denny. Congratulations. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 02, 2003
From: woody <duesouth(at)govital.net>
Subject: Re: Mark III late off ground.
A . He had not >installed any kind of trim on the plane. I know I have tried flying my Mk 111 and my Twinstar with the trim set incorrectly and it sure takes a lot of muscle to get it up. I thought there was something wrong with the plane untill I looked at the trim handle. Just didn't seem to want to fly. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Re: N616DR Airworthy
Date: Jun 03, 2003
----- Original Message ----- From: Rayfield, Bill <brayfield(at)kcc.com> Subject: RE: Kolb-List: N616DR Airworthy > > 475 lbs ! With a 690 ! Man you build light. That thing oughta really climb! Yeah Bill, I can't wait to try it out, now that the Feds delayed my inspection so long I may have to wait a few weeks to get her airborn. We are heading to Kittyhawk for vacation this Saturday, than home for a few days than off to Dayton Ohio for the Celebration of flight Dayton to Kittyhawk UL flight. I had hoped to take the Kolb, but did not finish it in time to fly off the test period, looks like the Loehle will be my steed for the trip, good thing it did not sale yet. Denny > > -----Original Message----- > From: rowedl(at)highstream.net [mailto:rowedl(at)highstream.net] > To: geraldh(at)intergrafix.net; kolblist; WillUribe(at)aol.com; Jay R Swager; earl > lafean > Subject: Kolb-List: N616DR Airworthy > > > Friends and neighbors, certificate. > Hallaluja!!!!. > > Denny Rowe > Kolb Mk-3-90-DR3 N616DR, 2SI 690L-70, Powerfin F model three blade, 2.65 to > 1 reduction, Gull wing doors, full enclosure, 475 pounds. > > > This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain > privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from > disclosure under law. If you have received this message in error, please > inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any > printed copy. Thank you. > ============================================================================ == > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Johann G." <johann(at)gi.is>
Subject: Re:Mark III late of the ground
Date: Jun 03, 2003
Hello List members. All who responded with solutions and ideas to my friends Mark III problems, I thank you all greatly for the help. We will work with the ideas and inform you on the list of our result. Until then, Best regards, Johann G. Iceland. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Landing Gear
Date: Jun 03, 2003
I'm in the midst of building steel landing gear for Vamoose, and as John H. recommends for uh - plump - Mk III's, I've ordered the heavier duty W-62 wheels, axles, and brakes to replace the standard ones. Soooo............in a week or so, I'll have a complete set-up for sale - aluminum gear legs; wheels; brakes; tires, fittings, and all. What am I bid ?? The gear legs have been shortened about 2". The whole thing is 6 yrs old, but brand new. Different topic - recently, when I've tried to open a picture, I get a drop down saying "What would you like to do with this file ??" Then I have to click "open it," etc. How can I get rid of that ?? I want to just open the pictures, and not hafta fool with it. Impatient Lar. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Kolb Mk III - Vamoose N78LB www.gogittum.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "S Ferkey" <sferkey(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Firestar II For Sale
Date: Jun 03, 2003
----- Original Message ----- From: "S Ferkey" <sferkey(at)charter.net> Subject: Kolb-List: Firestar II For Sale > > Hi fellow Kolbers !!! Just wanted to let you know that my brother has one of his factory quickbuild Firestar II' s for sale on ebay. If anyone has any questions you may conntact me and I will get you an answer ASAP. Thanks !!! > > Sheldon > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Airgriff2(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 04, 2003
Subject: 618 Rotax oil
Can't remember if I mentioned this or not, but I learned at Sun & Fun from Lockwood Aviation, that they are now recommendinng Penzoil Outboard motor oil for the Rotax 618> This is the petrolium based not the synthetic blend. Again, this is for the 618 only, not any other engines. Fly Safe Bob Griffin ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Gherkins Tim-rp3420 <rp3420(at)motorola.com>
Subject: Firestar trim tabs?
Date: Jun 04, 2003
Experienced Kolbers, I could not find, after searching in the archives for conclusive information on where to place the trim tabs on a Kolb Firestar II. The Kolb model is a Firestar II with a Rotax 503 with a B-gearbox. ( I believe the prop is turning clockwise as you stand behind the engine ) 1. Which side of the rudder should I place the tab? How big? length and width? 2. Should I place a tab on both elevators, or is one tab on one elevator enough? If, so what is the length and width? 3. What about ailerons, should they both have trim tabs? Where on the aileron, root end or the tip end? And length and width of tab. Come on Firestar owners, after having and flying your plane over time what you would do if you had to do it over again. Should I even mess with trim tabs? I know you can trim the pitch some what with aileron reflex. What about the rudder, does it need a tab. I am planning to do many hours of cross country flying and know that tabs would be appreciated. Maybe I am thinking too much and should just get along and cover this thing and fly it. Sure would appreciate your input on or off the list. Kindest regards, Tim Gherkins Firestar II in fabric covering stage ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 04, 2003
From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Firestar trim tabs?
Jim G/Gents/and Ladies: Sorry I missed you while vacationing at Gila Bend International Airport. However, I did get to spend some quality time with Uncle Craig. :-) If it were me, I would wait until I flew the airplane on a short cross country to see if and where I might need a trim tab. No need to hange them all over the aircraft if you do not need them. I usually try tp put the tab on the side of the control that will be doing the work. I use fabric rivets because the are easy to drill out if required. Also, .016 or .020 alum is good for tabs, because they are easy to bend. On my original Firestar I had a tab on right aileron, rudder, and one elevator. After adjusting a little to suit my needs, I had a great system that did not need to be tampered and tinkered with. I think the .016 I used would in fact deflect from its original setting to compensate for increase in airspeed. Was very happy with the way this little airplane flew and handled. john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Gherkins Tim-rp3420 <rp3420(at)motorola.com>
Subject: Firestar trim tabs?
Date: Jun 04, 2003
John, Excellent input on the .016 alum. and how it would deflect with increased airspeed. I never thought of that. With a clockwise turning prop, which side of the rudder should I place the tab? Uncle Craig reported on all your advise and mods on your MarkIII. He was really impressed, especially with your paint and paint scheme. Regards, Tim -----Original Message----- From: John Hauck [mailto:jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com] Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Firestar trim tabs? think the .016 I used would in fact deflect from its original setting to compensate for increase in airspeed. Was very happy with the way this little airplane flew and handled. john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ian Heritch" <iheritch(at)satx.rr.com>
Subject: Bathroom Scales
Date: Jun 04, 2003
Kolbers, are bathroom scales accurate enough to do the weight and balance? My wife has been telling me for years how inaccurate our scale is. Any suggestions? Ian Heritch San Antonio, TX Slingshot, ready to do weight & balance ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Brakes
Date: Jun 04, 2003
When I sent the message about my old wheels and brakes being for sale, I forgot to mention that they have the 15x6.00-6 Chen Shin tires mounted. I also have a pair of partially worn, but good Carlisle 15x6.00-6 tires that will go with the set-up. Lar. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Kolb Mk III - Vamoose N78LB www.gogittum.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 04, 2003
From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Firestar trim tabs?
With a clockwise turning prop, which side of the rudder should I place the tab? Tim G Tim/Gang: How come you asking an old fart who hasn't owned a two stroke in 10 years which side to put the rudder trim tab on? :-) The smiley face is for all the Kolbers who feel I am a meany, or something to that effect. hehehehe Because I don't beat around the bush, call a spade a spade, and tell it like it is or was, doesn't make me a meany. Just an ornery old fart, but not as old as my Brother Jim or a flying friend I affectionately refer to as "old as dirt". Since my 912S rotates opposite the two strokes, I would guess it goes on the right or starboard side of the rudder, with bend to right to deflect rudder left. Ya'll check me out since I have not drawn myself a picture of all this. Again, I would wait and fly the bird a good bit to insure I really understand what it needs before I start drilling holes and riveting. john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Re: Bathroom Scales
Date: Jun 04, 2003
She has, huh ?? Dare we answer that ?? :-) I borrowed 2 top end bathroom scales from work (a luxury hotel), weighed myself on each of them, then on a balance beam scale in the spa. They all agreed with each other, so I used them. Be very careful about the plane moving while on the scales. On my 1st attempt, with my own bathroom scale, while fooling with the tailwheel height to get the correct angle of attack, the right landing gear wheel rolled off the scale and trashed it. Too much weight in one corner - bent the frame. Fairly new, good quality scale, and it was junk in about 2 seconds. Lar. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Kolb Mk III - Vamoose N78LB www.gogittum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Heritch" <iheritch(at)satx.rr.com> Subject: Kolb-List: Bathroom Scales > > Kolbers, are bathroom scales accurate enough to do the weight and balance? My wife has been telling me for years how inaccurate our scale is. > > Any suggestions? > > Ian Heritch > San Antonio, TX > > Slingshot, ready to do weight & balance > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob, Kathleen, & Kory Brocious" <bbrocious(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bathroom Scales
Date: Jun 04, 2003
Ian, you are going to need at least 3 scales, one for each wheel. Calibrate them by weighing yourself on one and setting the others to match. You can then rotate the scales between the wheels a couple times to make sure you are getting accurate readings. Bob N57MB "Wait'n on the FAA" Bob, Kathleen, and Kory BrociousTenacity Farm Campbellsburg, Kentucky From: "Ian Heritch" <IHERITCH(at)SATX.RR.COM> Subject: Kolb-List: Bathroom Scales Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:00:54 -0500 -- Kolb-List message posted by: "Ian Heritch" Kolbers, are bathroom scales accurate enough to do the weight and balance? My wife has been telling me for years how inaccurate our scale is. Any suggestions? Ian Heritch San Antonio, TX Slingshot, ready to do weight balance ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "dama" <dama(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Bathroom Scales
Date: Jun 04, 2003
Yes Ian, borrow 2 other scales and see if the 3 are even close. Borrow another if one is way off. When they are in place under the wheels rotate all of them around 3 times for an average. The general consensus you will find is that this will be close enough. Kip http://www.springeraviation.net/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob, Kathleen, & Kory Brocious" <bbrocious(at)hotmail.com> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Bathroom Scales > > > Ian, you are going to need at least 3 scales, one for each wheel. Calibrate them by weighing yourself on one and setting the others to match. You can then rotate the scales between the wheels a couple times to make sure you are getting accurate readings. > > Bob > > N57MB "Wait'n on the FAA" > > > Bob, Kathleen, and Kory BrociousTenacity Farm > > Campbellsburg, Kentucky > > > From: "Ian Heritch" <IHERITCH(at)SATX.RR.COM> > To: > Subject: Kolb-List: Bathroom Scales > Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:00:54 -0500 > > -- Kolb-List message posted by: "Ian Heritch" > > Kolbers, are bathroom scales accurate enough to do the weight and balance? My wife has been telling me for years how inaccurate our scale is. > > Any suggestions? > > Ian Heritch > San Antonio, TX > > Slingshot, ready to do weight balance > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 04, 2003
From: Jack & Louise Hart <jbhart(at)ldd.net>
Subject: Re: Firestar trim tabs?
> >Experienced Kolbers, > >I could not find, after searching in the archives for conclusive information on where to place the trim tabs on a Kolb Firestar II. > >The Kolb model is a Firestar II with a Rotax 503 with a B-gearbox. ( I believe the prop is turning clockwise as you stand behind the engine ) > >1. Which side of the rudder should I place the tab? How big? length and width? > >2. Should I place a tab on both elevators, or is one tab on one elevator enough? If, so what is the length and width? > >3. What about ailerons, should they both have trim tabs? Where on the aileron, root end or the tip end? And length and width of tab. > Tim, 1. Assuming your Firestar II is reasonably well rigged, there is no need for a tab on the rudder. Just adjust engine tilt until the ball becomes centered at cruise with no pressure on the rudder pedals. See: http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly56.html 2. & 3. Very light in cockpit adjustable trims can be fitted to the aileron and elevator control horns in the cockpit with the use of guitar string tighteners, woven fish line and some bungee cord. There is nothing to come loose on the elevator or aileron and the possible flutter problems if it does come loose. These trim mechanisms can be seen at: http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly57.html http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly51.html http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly76.html It is best to test fly without trim so that one can determine where the trims need to be placed. If one has to fly with too much back or forward stick, one may want to adjust the leading edge of the horizontal stabilizer before addressing elevator trim. Jack B. Hart FF004 Jackson, MO Jack & Louise Hart jbhart(at)ldd.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 04, 2003
From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Monument Valley 2003
Kolbers: These are pics taken by Jim Hefner. The aerial shots were made from his Kolb Fire Fly: http://home.sw.rr.com/jhauck/Monument%20Valley%202003/Jim%20Hefner/ john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Martin" <kolbdriver(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Ultralight trailer
Date: Jun 04, 2003
Hello members, I've got the chance to buy a 25 ft trailer for my Firestar II, but don't if it's suitable. The trailer has tandem torsion axles, each rated at 3,500 lbs. Think it was originally designed as a snowmobile (4) trailer, and the owner had its roof raised 1 ft for more prop and tail clearance. Has only about 800 miles on it so far. Would the suspension be too stiff for an ultralight? Can the torsion axles be "detuned" to a softer suspension? Thanks. Don Kolbdriver(at)hotmail.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 05, 2003
From: "johnjung(at)compusenior.com" <johnjung(at)compusenior.com>
Subject: Re: Ultralight trailer
Don, I have almost the same trailer, and because of the torsion bar axles, it rides really smooth. The only problem is that it takes a good tow vehicle, not because of weight, but because of the amount of air. John Jung ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BILLBEAM(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 05, 2003
Subject: Re: Visitor to KGKY
You Southern Kentucky jocks. Just heard on the news that someone was killed in an ultralight crash around Somerset, Ky. Any information?? 308 Jessamine Station Road Wilmore, Kentucky 40390 Phone: 859-858-3168 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BILLBEAM(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 05, 2003
Subject: Re: Visitor to KGKY
Just got the word that the fatality near Somerset, KY was William Steelman. It was not a Kolb. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BILLBEAM(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 05, 2003
Subject: Re: Fatality
John, Somerset is about 35 miles west of London. I believe the factory guys use a London address. Howard Ping is running his Firestar in the Somerset area. He probably knows the deceased. Bill Wilmore, Kentucky 40390 Phone: 859-858-3168 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 05, 2003
From: "Gary robert voigt" <johndeereantique(at)qwest.net>
Subject: Re: Ultralight trailer
Don, you can not change the torsion aspect of it and you would not want to because it is all welded in...i don't know what you are going to pay but it sounds like a nice trailer. if the curb weight of the trailer is 3500 lbs. like mine is, that means you can only haul 3500 lbs. which is way more than you will ever probably haul but if you go to 2 - 2000 axels that means you can only haul 500 lbs. because you are over the gross weight and say you want to sell it someday for a car hauler....not too many cars under 500 lbs. except maybe for a yougo....there goes your resale value. i love my haulmark and would not trade it for anything. thanks, Gary r. voigt Don Martin wrote: > > Hello members, > > I've got the chance to buy a 25 ft trailer for my Firestar II, but don't if > it's suitable. The trailer has tandem torsion axles, each rated at 3,500 > lbs. Think it was originally designed as a snowmobile (4) trailer, and the > owner had its roof raised 1 ft for more prop and tail clearance. Has only > about 800 miles on it so far. > > Would the suspension be too stiff for an ultralight? Can the torsion axles > be "detuned" to a softer suspension? > > Thanks. > > Don Kolbdriver(at)hotmail.com > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net>
Subject: Re: storage and wheels
Date: Jun 06, 2003
SpamAssassin (Message larger than max testing size) any one know who owns this one? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Steuber" <esteuber(at)rochester.rr.com> Subject: Kolb-List: storage and wheels > > Ronnie, > I think the only reasonable place for storage of a good amount of camping and maintenance items would be above the engine in the triangle area.....You could make a permanent or temporary storage area by using vinyl covered clamps that will attach to the tubing with no welding.. I had a 5 gallon plastic gas tank that fit in that area on my last Ultrastar that did not make any difference to propellar air or airspeed. I plan on using this area again on the new Ultrastar which will give me the option on trips of 11 gallons but still removable . Look in the photo share and you can see the plastic tank position on my old Ultrastar.. > > Don. > Go with the 6 inch rims , tires and tubes. I only know about the aluminum and not the plastic. I did have considerable trouble with the Azusa wheels because of assembly problems concerning wobble. The only solution was to assenble everything on the axle and torque very carefully...never got it perfect but acceptable. Tracy Obrien brakes recquired a lot of screwing around to make acceptable......Although I do like the result . Good Luck > Ed in Western NY > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 05, 2003
From: Robert Laird <rlaird(at)cavediver.com>
Subject: Re: Visitor to KGKY
At 10:47 PM 6/5/2003, you wrote: >Maybe >there will some more Kolbs up there. This will be my first time there. Any >lurkers planning on attending besides John and I? > > Ed Diebel (Getting ready to install 447 ) Ed -- There should be a small contingent of fat UL-ers from Bailes Airport, Angleton, Texas, heading for Bowie. Bailes is about 20 miles south of Houston, and a very active ultralight airport (7R9), and EAA Chapter (347). You should run into John Wall in his blue and white Challenger II, John Riley in his red and white RANS S-12XL, and Russell Hakanson in his newly repaired SkyBoy, draped in a patriotic red, white and blue. These folks are as friendly as they come, so if you see 'em, stop and say howdy! -- Robert ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Clay Stuart" <tcstuart(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: fatality
Date: Jun 06, 2003
Here is the link about the crash near London: http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/news/state/6026085.htm On TV they talked about the E number number on the tail indicating that it was an experimental plane. I think that would be the European designation for the Czech-made plane. Is that correct? Clay Stuart Danville KY ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jam'n" <jghunter(at)nol.net>
Subject: Re: fatality
Date: Jun 06, 2003
and another... yesterday, i believe not sure of all the details other than as stated here... but the message here is clear. we must always be on the path towards safe flights. as a pilot i think of each flite i take and the joy of the 'marvel of flight' and how special it is to go up there and encounter the magic.... just some knowledge, skill and a bunch of parts... yet i never forget that it is a combination of parts and things that allows for the possibility... and for this flight do i have it all together so that the unexpected will not show its ugly head? will all the parts perform each's contribution to the required function? i am aware of several recent losses in ga aviation of highly skilled pilots, lots of time, where aviation was a life style for them... yet despite all the experience and knowledge... murphy's law showed up. despite all the safety they had a failure. and it cost them and their passenges their lives. one can only share these sorts of posts. the losses of these families are shared by the entire aviation community. one must endeavor at all costs to manage the weather issue and the combination of parts... so that the magic never disappears. be safe! be careful! jg ----- Original Message ----- From: Phil Subject: [Alaskan Aviators] Re: Another tragedy Joe Every time I hear of an aircraft crash pray it wasn't someone I know. Mike Jackober will be dearly missed, I stopped in to say hi and have a cup of coffee with Mike whenever I was in the area. He was always interested in how things where going in Fairbanks and one of the few ultralight enthusiasts that was truely interested in all aspects of aviation. He helped me though some rough times with my ultralight and was certainly the most knowlegable and skilled trike pilot in the state. He was also internationally know for some of his innovations, especially his in flight mixture control for Rotax 2 cycle engines. This is truely a great loss to aviation, I will miss him... Phil --- In alaskanaviators(at)yahoogroups.com, "captaincook9611" <captaincook9611@y...> wrote: > Sadly, there was another fatal ultralight accident today when a > training flight went down at Birchwood. Mike Jacober and a student > pilot from Homer were on board. Initial reports are there may have > been structural seperation according to a police witness of the > scene. > Mike owned Arctic Sparrow Ultralights at Birchwood and was argueably > the > highest time ultralight pilot in the State, and one time even flew > over > McKinley in one. He will be missed. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "George Thompson" <eagle1(at)commspeed.net>
Subject: Mike Jackober
Date: Jun 06, 2003
I too had the pleasure of meeting Mike while I was in Alaska a couple of years ago. He showed me all through his hanger and flight operations. I also bought his in flight mixture controls for both of my Firestars. He was a true professional and a dedicated ultralight enthusiast. Our Sport will miss him. My two Firestars are still for sale. George Thompson ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net>
Subject: Re: Mike Jackober
Date: Jun 07, 2003
what was he flying? ----- Original Message ----- From: "George Thompson" <eagle1(at)commspeed.net> Subject: Kolb-List: Mike Jackober > > I too had the pleasure of meeting Mike while I was in Alaska a couple of years ago. He showed me all through his hanger and flight operations. I also bought his in flight mixture controls for both of my Firestars. He was a true professional and a dedicated ultralight enthusiast. Our Sport will miss him. > > My two Firestars are still for sale. > > George Thompson > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "George Thompson" <eagle1(at)commspeed.net>
Subject: Re: Mike Jackober
Date: Jun 06, 2003
Mike did most of his training and flying in Trikes and I do not know sure, I think it would be a two place Trike with a student aboard. ----- Original Message ----- From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Mike Jackober > > what was he flying? > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "George Thompson" <eagle1(at)commspeed.net> > To: > Subject: Kolb-List: Mike Jackober > > > > > > I too had the pleasure of meeting Mike while I was in Alaska a couple > of years ago. He showed me all through his hanger and flight operations. I > also bought his in flight mixture controls for both of my Firestars. He was > a true professional and a dedicated ultralight enthusiast. Our Sport will > miss him. > > > > My two Firestars are still for sale. > > > > George Thompson > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 06, 2003
From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Monument Valley Flight
Hi Ya'll: Started playing around with some pics I took on my flight out west. 1. Coming out of Stove Pipe Wells, Death Valley, California, to the west: http://home.sw.rr.com/jhauck/Monument%20Valley%202003/jhauck/Pass%20out%20of%20Stove%20Pipe%20Wells,%20Desert%20Valley.JPG 2. Ship Rock, NM: http://home.sw.rr.com/jhauck/Monument%20Valley%202003/jhauck/Ship%20Rock,%20NM.JPG 3. San Joaquin Valley between Turlock and Watsonville, California: http://home.sw.rr.com/jhauck/Monument%20Valley%202003/jhauck/San%20Joaquin%20Valley.JPG Stuck these up on the index page to see how they would come out. Got lot more when I get time to work with them. john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kirk Smith" <snuffy(at)usol.com>
Subject: New engine
Date: Jun 07, 2003
http://www.ultralightnews.ca/sunfun03/8.htm A new 4 stroke alternative. Anybody seen this engine yet? Kirk ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 07, 2003
From: Bob Bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: geo thrust line
Rick and curious bystanders, with the dry sump I have about 2" clearance to the boom tube with a 70" prop. Mine is mounted in the standard upright position. Initial runs with the prop at approx 12 deg yielded about 3800 rpm static. Before I make any changes I'll check the accuracy of the tach with a handheld optical unit. I believe 4000 static would be about right for me. The geo develops peak torque at 3500 rpm and stays flat up to about 5000, thereafter falling off. 60 ftlbs @ 3500 and intersecting the 582 curve at 6000rpm and 55 ftlbs. -BB ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "boyd young" <by0ung(at)brigham.net>
Subject: trim tabs
Date: Jun 06, 2003
>>>>>>>> With a clockwise turning prop, which side of the rudder should I place the tab? Tim G Again, I would wait and fly the bird a good bit to insure I really understand what it needs before I start drilling holes and riveting. john h<<<<<<<<<< I am with john here I would not be too big a hurry to add tabs until i had a chance to fly the plane .... untill you fly it you dont know if it even needs one.... After you fly you will have an idea of how much control pressure it takes and can adjust the size and bend as necessary. boyd ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: New engine
Date: Jun 07, 2003
I saw that Ilmore at Sun'n'Fun and talked to the reps. The engine is a spin-off of a model they made for the US Gov trials on UAV powerplants. With the expanded use of UAV's by the military and the contracts to be yet bid, this engine is hoped to compete in a 100 hp class for UAV's and if they get the contract, they will offer it to the light aircraft market. Ilmore was NOT awarded the 150 hp class bid, and that is why we never saw the larger engine on the civilian market http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm Don Gherardini- FireFly 098 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "James" <jamesl(at)acncanada.net>
Subject: Firestar II for sale.
Date: Jun 07, 2003
Selling :1995 Firestar II, 120 TT ,503 DCDI.three blade IVO. pull start,airspeed,alt.,and compass plus engine instruments.Located southern Ontario (Wheatley) $12500.cdn. Jim ,email or phone 519-825-3569 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 07, 2003
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)airmail.net>
Subject: Re: RE: Geo
Rick, If your had to hang your VW engine from a hook with everything but the prop, what would it weigh? Also what kind of fuel consumption are you seeing? I like the VW but they seem heavy. jerb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 08, 2003
From: Rick & Martha Neilsen <neilsenrm(at)comcast.net>
Subject: VW
I never weighed the complete VW engine package but when I add up the weights that Great Plains Aircraft publishes (I consider them to much more reputable) I figured it once to be app 10lbs more than a Rotax 912. My fuel burn appears to be between 3.5 and 5 gallons per hour depending on the power usage. I need to start doing some cross county flying to get a good fuel usage figure but it will be in the 3.5-4 GPH range at a low power 3200RPM 75MPH cruise. Currently my MKIII likes to fly in the 75-79MPH range. I have a number of streamlining plans, the first of which will be pulling in the doors like the Richard Pike has done but I wanted to keep the airframe the same till I finished all the engine work. My current air speeds are: RPM MPH(GPS) 3000 70 3200 75 3300 78-79 3700 93 Full Throttle 3400 55 Full Throttle Climb 3500 60 Full Throttle Climb As you can see at 3200RPM cruise the engine is loafing and will hopefully live a long and happy life. The reduction drive engine has had a problem with low CHT and oil temps that I'm still working on eg. oil temp of no more than 180 degrees and CHT of 300 degrees but these are easy problems. The CHT on the ground has to be watched as it will climb if I sit on the ground running too long (10 minutes maximum) with no air blowing thru the cooling scoops. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIII classic -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of jerb Subject: Re: Kolb-List: RE: Geo Rick, If your had to hang your VW engine from a hook with everything but the prop, what would it weigh? Also what kind of fuel consumption are you seeing? I like the VW but they seem heavy. jerb ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Fackler, Ken" <kfackler(at)ameritech.net>
Subject: Michigan Thumb Tour
Date: Jun 08, 2003
Well, fellow Kolbers, the trip around Michigan's Thumb was a big success and a big hit with the local populace. If you'd like to see a few pictures I took, here's a link: http://www.hiperlightaircraft.com/thumb_tour_03/ There were 13 planes, 4 of which were Kolbs! Mark II - Ken Fackler (hey, that's me!) Mark II - Ken Beaupre Firefly - Dominic Tringali Firestar - Mark Grey The first three are all based at my home field. -Ken Fackler Mark II / 503 Rochester MI ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 08, 2003
From: possums <possums(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Air Ralley
2003 GSFA AIR RALLY Saturday, June 14 (Campers Welcome Fri-Sat; rain date: June 15) Etowah Bend Gliderport, Kingston , Ga Flying Competition: (Torpedo Run, Bomb Drop, Spot Landing); RC Airplane demos, Raffles ,Silent Auction, Campfire, All Nite Poker Game (bring lots of money and the title to your plane) Great Food, Fun, Candy Drop & Moonwalk for the Kids directions http://www.georgiasportflyers.com/pages/ar.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 08, 2003
From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Air Ralley
> 2003 GSFA AIR RALLY > Saturday, June 14 (Campers Welcome Fri-Sat; rain date: June 15) > Etowah Bend Gliderport, Kingston , Ga Possum/Gang: I'll try and be there. Think we might be able to go over to that little resturant we went to last year? Folks, this is a good little flyin and a lot of fun. Located in a great area. john h ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 08, 2003
From: "Bob N." <ronoy(at)shentel.net>
Subject: Re: Michigan Thumb Tour
And did you know that the teeny town at the end of the Thumb is Grindstone City...and the next town south is Bad Axe. Put IFF on radar at Bad Axe in '51. Bob N. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Bryan" <jimwbryan(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Kolb trailers
Date: Jun 10, 2003
Can Anybody Help!!! Is there any body in the good ole U.S of A can help me in locating either Richard Swinderski or Gene Ledbetter. Both of the posted e:mail adds don't seem to work I need help in building a covered trailer for my Mk3. Regards, Jim Bryan Protect your PC from e-mail viruses. Get MSN 8 today. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <gdledbetter1(at)fuse.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb trailers
Date: Jun 10, 2003
Jim, You can call me at 513-984-4009. Gene Ledbetter Email is gdledbetter1(at)fuse.net Very often, the 1 is not noticed in my email address. ------------------------------------------------ > Can Anybody Help!!! > > Is there any body in the good ole U.S of A can help me in locating either Richard Swinderski or Gene Ledbetter. Both of the posted e:mail adds don't seem to work > I need help in building a covered trailer for my Mk3. > Regards, > > Jim Bryan ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 10, 2003
From: Jack & Louise Hart <jbhart(at)ldd.net>
Subject: Drag Reduction, FireFly Wing Strut Fairings & A Quieter FireFly
Kolbers, I have been looking at reducing drag while remaining Part 103 compliant. At 55 mphi one can calculate/estimate the horsepower required to overcome the drag of various components. Struts -> 1.7 hp Rear of fuselage -> 1.4 hp (covered from top to bottom) All 5/16 OD trailing edges -> 0.8 hp Aileron/flaperon torque tubes -> 0.6 hp Aileron push rod tubes -> .2 hp Tail wires -> .2 hp If one fairs all these out, one could expect to reduce the horsepower to fly 55 mphi by 4.5 hp, and remain Part 103 compliant. Other areas for drag reduction would be the wing mid section, and the gap between the horizontal stabilizer and the fuselage tube. I started by mounting some fairings to the original round tube struts on the FireFly. My out of pocket cost was minimal, but I have several hours invested in figuring out how to get them made. They came out about twice as heavy as I thought they would be. The total weight gain was 12 ounces. I mounted the struts yesterday and flew for about 45 minutes. I expected the FireFly to cruise a little better, but the most noticeable effect was that the FireFly is quieter because the struts do not strum in the wind as one flies. I never noticed they strummed until the noise was gone. It was a normal sound of flying the FireFly. After thinking about it I realized this strumming is caused by the vortices generated on the back side of the tubing, first from one side and then the other. This caused the tubes to vibrate up and down perpendicular to the airflow. The fairings stiffen and improve the air flow about the struts which minimize vortex generation. I put up a new page at:
http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly91.html Now to go for the back of the fuselage. Jack B. Hart FF004 Jackson, MO Jack & Louise Hart jbhart(at)ldd.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 10, 2003
From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Monument Valley Pics
All: Here are some MV pics by Dennis Kirby of Cedar Crest, NM: http://home.sw.rr.com/jhauck/Dennis%20Kirby/ After you get to the index page, click on the individual file to bring up the pic. Then hit the back button to go back to the index page. The name of the file explains who is in the pic, except for "Bunch". The hoodlums, left to right are: Tom Kuffel Ziggy Boyd Young Arizona Dave Pelletier John Hauck Eric Weaver Dennis Kirby John Williamson Jim Hefner Camera shy is Big Lar, alias Larry Bourne Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Williamson" <kolbrapilot(at)attbi.com>
Subject: Re: Monument Valley Pics
Date: Jun 10, 2003
John H. and Listers, Thanks for the great photos John. I have added a couple of more links on my website so these photos can be found very easy. http://home.attbi.com/~kolbrapilot/OtherKolbPhotos.htm John Williamson Arlington, TX Kolb Kolbra, N49KK, Jabiru 2200, 331 hours http://home.attbi.com/~kolbrapilot ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob, Kathleen, & Kory Brocious" <bbrocious(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Lights?! Lights?! We don't need no stinking lights!
Date: Jun 10, 2003
Folks, My Mark III is/was ready for inspection, maybe. I just read FAR 91, Section 91.205. Here's the part that confused me... . For small civil airplanes certificated after March 11, 1996, in accordance with part 23 of this chapter, an approved aviation red or aviation white anticollision light system. In the event of failure of any light of the anticollision light system, operation of the aircraft may continue to a location where repairs or replacement can be made. Do I have to have a light on my Mark III to pass inspection? I am certifying it for VFR day only. Thanx ... Bob ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: Drag Reduction, FireFly Wing Strut Fairings & A Quieter
FireFly
Date: Jun 10, 2003
Jack, very interesting this strut stuff! Something I have been wondering about our FireFlys tho. The wing seems just the same as a Firestar..but shorter. The wing loading is also about equal if the Firefly is kept light within reason...now...why do we have 2 struts and they have Just one? I have heard speculation about Dennis designing 2 struts on the Firefly to slow it down and remain within part 103...I am gonna have to hear that from Dennis himself I think ..seems pretty odd to me...as it is too fast still....HE coulda just used a smaller engine, that would have made a whole lot more sense. What I would like to know is if anyone has attempted to use one strut on a firefly or anyone has seen this done? http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm Don Gherardini- FireFly 098 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: Lights?! Lights?! We don't need no stinking lights!
Date: Jun 10, 2003
No Cy Galley Editor, EAA Safety Programs cgalley(at)qcbc.org or experimenter(at)eaa.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob, Kathleen, & Kory Brocious" <bbrocious(at)hotmail.com> Subject: Kolb-List: Lights?! Lights?! We don't need no stinking lights! > > > Folks, > My Mark III is/was ready for inspection, maybe. I just read FAR 91, Section 91.205. Here's the part that confused me... . > > > For small civil airplanes certificated after March 11, 1996, in accordance with part 23 of this chapter, an approved aviation red or aviation white anticollision light system. In the event of failure of any light of the anticollision light system, operation of the aircraft may continue to a location where repairs or replacement can be made. > > Do I have to have a light on my Mark III to pass inspection? I am certifying it for VFR day only. > > > Thanx ... Bob > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 10, 2003
Subject: Oshkosh fly-in
From: Scott Trask <sctrask(at)diisd.org>
Yo, all you trolls down there in Lower Michigan, If you want to come on up to God's Country (the U.P.) on your way to Oshkosh, this UPer would be happy to guide you all in to Oshkosh Fly-In this year. You'd be welcome to hang your hat here on the back forty. Scott Trask Mk111 @ IMT ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 10, 2003
From: Rick & Martha Neilsen <neilsenrm(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Oshkosh fly-in
Hey Scott I would like that. I haven't done any cross country work in my MKIII "YET" so it is a bit of a stretch to confirm that I will be there but at this point I'm planning on Oshkosh and the God's county route sounds like the best way to go. How far are you from Oshkosh and when are you planning to attend? Rick Neilsen Redrive VW Powered MKIII -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Scott Trask Subject: Kolb-List: Oshkosh fly-in Yo, all you trolls down there in Lower Michigan, If you want to come on up to God's Country (the U.P.) on your way to Oshkosh, this UPer would be happy to guide you all in to Oshkosh Fly-In this year. You'd be welcome to hang your hat here on the back forty. Scott Trask Mk111 @ IMT ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 10, 2003
From: Jack & Louise Hart <jbhart(at)ldd.net>
Subject: Two Struts Per Wing on FireFly
>I have heard speculation about Dennis designing 2 struts on the Firefly to >slow it down and remain within part 103...I am gonna have to hear that from >Dennis himself I think ..seems pretty odd to me...as it is too fast >still....HE coulda just used a smaller engine, that would have made a whole >lot more sense. > Don, It all has to do with trying to keep the FireFly with in the ultra light vehicle envelope. You can see for your self at: http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/fireflylegal.html All the calculations are there to see if the FireFly meets Part 103-7 requirements. In defense of Dennis choice of engine, one must remember that the Dennis had to design with the Rotax 447 because at that time there was not much to choose from. To get rid of that power, he was forced to use the four struts, the pilot half exposed, etc. to come up with an acceptable drag factor. Also, one must remember that by meeting the design parameters in Part 103-7 Appendixes fulfills the requirements for an aircraft to be called an ultra light vehicle. Under these constrains, if you can get it to cruise faster than 63 mph and stall faster than 27 mph, it remains a legal ultra light vehicle. Jack B. Hart FF004 Jackson, MO Jack & Louise Hart jbhart(at)ldd.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 10, 2003
From: possums <possums(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Air Ralley
They/we will be setting things up all day Friday and camping out Friday nite - if the weather is good. Mostly "them" - it's good for the new members to take charge ain't it? Probably will be camping out on Saturday nite too. But you never can tell about Saturday. Come over and I'll buy the frog legs at "that restaurant" on the river - and you eat them. > > > > 2003 GSFA AIR RALLY > > Saturday, June 14 (Campers Welcome Fri-Sat; rain date: June 15) > > Etowah Bend Gliderport, Kingston , Ga > >Possum/Gang: > >I'll try and be there. Think we might be able to >go over to that little resturant we went to last >year? > >Folks, this is a good little flyin and a lot of >fun. Located in a great area. > >john h ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 11, 2003
From: possums <possums(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Air Ralley
>Possum/All: > >I'll plan on flying up Sat morning if I can get up >and out of here early, unless I am going to miss >something Friday, other than work. ---------- Here's what you'll be missing - I'd come Sat. morning - if I was you. I'll email Highsmith, you find Steve Green. ---------- May 31, 2003 Mid-Month Punch ListMeeting Fuel was discussed. It will be picked up in a 50 gallon tank, kept on the bed of a pickup truck and mixed using PENNZOIL Aircraft OIL in separate 6 gallon containers then sold at cost to who wants to purchase gas. Fuel to be delivered by the use of the pick up truck to planes. 93 AMOCO Octane will be used. We will refill the 50 gallon tank as needed. Bill Wood is responsible to pick up the Chuck Wagon. Thanks Bill! Friday evening prior to the air Rally folks are welcome to camp-out as well as help with last minute setup!! There was discussion of a dinner and breakfast, and maybe a bonfire, if enough folks showed interest in this activity. There is a shower in the clubhouse for guests. Air Boss/runway lights were discussed next. Richard Logue has a large green and red traffic light with 12 lenses that will be used to signal pilots of landing conditions. Kim Arrowood presided over the meeting. Kim went over items on her Punch-list. P.A. System: System available, all arrangements confirmed. Candy Drop: Falls under games. 3 candy drops done during last years rally. RC Helicopter, Trike, Ultralight. Person buying food to pick up candy at that time. Fuel: Ready. Have(2) 6 gallon plastic containers to mix fuel and have portable 2-way radios to be used to call fuel truck. We still need a fuel sign with price and contact persons name to buy fuel. Media: Video cameras (2) ready with extra Hi 8 Film and extra battery packs. It is requested that anyone shooting video or digital pictures at the rally please contact me (Hugo Garcia) so I can arrange to get copies of pictures and videos we want to use your videos and pictures on the GSFA website. The website has the capability to show video clips as well as still images. We will compile a 5-10 min video recap of this years festivities in a streaming video for the website. T-Shirts: Have 150 T-shirts cost $1087. Invoice to be paid after the air rally sales. We got a flat rate for all shirts even the XXL were priced the same. Runway: The runway needed inspection to locate pot holes and filled these in with dirt. This task will be done Monday June 9th. Treasury: We will need $100 of change. It is asked that GSFA please bring plenty of small bills should change be needed we can ask members to change larger bills for smaller bills. Thanks! Aviation Radios: We have radios for the Air Boss and crew, additional loaner aviation radios or 2-way radios would be welcome. Generators and Extension Cords, Fuel for Generators: Ready. Food/Igloos/Ice: Cook staff and crew in place. Kim will round up the food and candy and ice. Menu: Hotdogs, hamburgers, baked beans, chips, sodas/bottled water, bags of Famous Amos Cookies. Chuck Wagon pickup and return arranged. Water sales were discussed and bottled water will be available for sale. Scaffolding: Ready. To be obtained same place as last year. Tables/Chairs/Moon Walk: All theses items rented same place as moon walk. Parking: The Boy Scout troop helping with parking will be at the field Saturday at 8am. Three volunteers are need to teach scouts about aviation so they can earn aviation merit badges. Please contact Kim Arrowwood to volunteer if interested, there are certain requirements the scouts need to complete to earn this badge. Insurance: The final discussion was on the cost of the use of Etowah Bend facilities. In the past the club has paid of the insurance cost about $400 at Etowah Bend in return for the use of these facilities. There is strong indication that the insurance will go up and GSFAs share maybe $800-1200 per year. This issue was left unresolved until we get a firm quote of what will be due for the use of Etowah Bend, and will probably be an item on the GSFA Website for members to vote on this expenditures approval. All in attendance indicated even at the increased price the facilities were excellent, convenient, Better facilities probably were not available. > > > > Probably will be camping out on Saturday nite too. But you never can tell > > about Saturday. > > Come over and I'll buy the frog legs at "that restaurant" on the river - > > and you eat them. > > >Have you heard from any of the other Kolbers or >the guys in Panama City? > >Steven Green should fly down. Have not heard from >him. Gave Steven a ride in the Mark III at Etowah >several years ago. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Airgriff2(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 11, 2003
Subject: What gas to burn ?
I understand that here in NY, all gas manufacturers will be ban from using MTBE. This is the additive that Rotax says is ok in 2 stroke engines. Some gas companies use alcohol based additives which are not good for 2 strokes. Up to this point , pilots in this area have been using Hess or Sunoco which have been using MTBE. With the upcoming ban on MTBE ,on or before the first of the year, I,m not sure what we are going to do? Have any of you on the list ran into this problem and how did you deal with it. Possibly some companies will not put additives in at all, but most do to boost the octane rating. Fly Safe Bob Griffin ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Thom Riddle" <jtriddle(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: Michigans Thumb
Date: Jun 11, 2003
I am new to the Kolb List and would like to meet you when you come through Niagara Falls area. I live in Tonawanda a northern suburb of Buffalo and keep my plane at Buffalo Airfield (9G0), southeast side of Buffalo. If you are planning on viewing the falls from the air, there is now a permanent NOTAM and TFR which dictates and limits the way one can fly over the falls. 3500' min., clockwise pattern, radio announce position etc. etc. etc. Thom in Buffalo ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 11, 2003
From: Jack & Louise Hart <jbhart(at)ldd.net>
Subject: Re: Drag Reduction, FireFly Wing Strut Fairings & A
Quieter FireFly > >Seems like I remember an old Waco? Stinson? (something) that had two struts >per side, and the bottom third of the strut gap on each side was joined >with one large streamline to reduce the interference drag caused by the one >strut being close behind the other. Might be worth taking a real close look >at the chart in the Part 103 documentation and see if you could get away >with fairing/combining part/a lot of the lower part of the two struts >together and still make the legalities work? Or would it cause too much >trouble setting up/breaking down the aircraft? Would it be worth the trouble? > Richard, Dennis used just about the minimum distance for the struts to count, and he separated the upper ends to meet the eight inch criteria. When I mounted the faired struts to the lower mount, I had to trim away some of the fairing material so that so that the lower ends of both struts do become pretty much as one. One has to be careful to still meet the four foot length requirement. The part relating to struts from Part 103-7 is shown below: Maximum Level Flight Air Speed Calculations - Appendix 1 ******************************************************** 5. Exposed Struts Drag Factor (total struts over 4 feet long and 45 to 90 degrees to airflow [excluding those associated with landing gear] = __4__ x 0.4) ............................. __1.60__ The number of wires or struts, not associated with the landing gear, which are OVER 4 FEET LONG with an angle of 45 TO 90 DEGREES TO THE AIRFLOW are counted and multiplied times the given values. ... Wires or struts located parallel to and behind other wires or struts in the airflow are not counted if they do not flare uniformally away from any common attaching point, achieving a minimum separation of at least 8 inches. --------- At the hangar, I am going to have to play with some more foam to see if I can shape some smooth transistions between the upper strut ends and the bottom of the wing and the lower strut ends and the fuselage. I believe the trick is going to be how to use some light quick disconnects to these shapes so that they will not complicate wing folding. But this will have to wait while I will after the larger drag components. Jack B. Hart FF004 Jackson, MO Jack & Louise Hart jbhart(at)ldd.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "boyd young" <by0ung(at)brigham.net>
Subject: lights on kolb
Date: Jun 11, 2003
I dont have any on mine and it passed. boyd ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 11, 2003
From: "Wayne F.Wilson" <wfwilson1(at)yahoo.ca>
Subject: Firefly Wanted to buy!
I am looking for a Firefly in any stage of construction from Kit to complete and flying. Prefer without engine. Located in Ontario Canada near Detroit MI. Yours truly Wayne F Wilson wfwilson1(at)yahoo.ca ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DAquaNut(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 11, 2003
Subject: Re: Fuel pump
Fireflyers, Is there a better place to mount the mikuni fuel pump, than on the tab under the rear lord mount that the plans call for? Have they changed the location on the newer fireflies? Also, is there a need for a rubber washer or grommet under the fuel pump to reduce vibration? Seems Ive seen where they mounted a pump on a piece of 3/4x 3/4 x1/16 angle. Thanks to those who have helped in the past. Ed ( Installing 447 in Houston) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 11, 2003
From: Rick & Martha Neilsen <neilsenrm(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Oshkosh fly-in
John/All The coordinates for my airport are N 42 43.061 W 84 43.321 on aircraft maps I'm 1.25 statute miles due west of the Lansing VOR. The runway is really only a one way strip due to trees and power lines on the east end so I take off on 26 and land on 08. It is app 1400 ft long, grass. It is my private strip and with lots of area for camping. Everyone is welcome. You may want to buzz the runway to check for or scare off the deer. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIII -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of John Hauck Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Oshkosh fly-in > Let me know and I will send coordinates and directions for my strip. > > Rick Neilsen Rick/All: Send the your coords. I have no firm plans now, but would file the coords away just in case. I flew up through Michigan in 1989, in the Firestar. RON's at Linden, MI. Then on up to Sault Saint Marie, and across to Manistique for another RON. Came into OSH from the North that year. Might be nice to refly that route again. Will let you know what I decided to do when the time comes. Have not heard from Scott Trask yet. Take care, ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kirk Smith" <snuffy(at)usol.com>
Subject: Re: Oshkosh fly-in
Date: Jun 11, 2003
As long as us Michiganders are at it. My GPS N 43 10.8 W 83 21.1 Lots of camping room, pond for a dip or catch a bass, plenty of shade. 2100 feet 9/27 one mile east of the north and south branch of the Flint river. Watch for deer and wild turkeys. Kirk ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 11, 2003
Subject: Oshkosh Fly-in
From: Scott Trask <sctrask(at)diisd.org>
This is what I propose. I'm off of work from July 25 to Aug.8. We can leave the first nice day or evening at the start of the event. If it looks like it would be better to leave in the late afternoon we could. We could stay the night at a private strip. A friend has very nice place 10 miles from OSH. He has rooms and sometimes hanger space. I'm 120 miles north from OSH. N4553.478 W088 04.598 When it gets a little closer to the event we can touch base who's going and more details. I have other ideas that we can kick around off site. Looking forward to it. Scott Trask IMT ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 11, 2003
From: woody <duesouth(at)govital.net>
Subject: Re: Oshkosh fly-in
> > >I think it would be cool to have a dozen or so >Kolbs hit the Ultralight Airstrip in the UL area >at OSH a the same time. :-) > >john h Depending on the legalities I would like to try that next year. Count me in if you don't mind flying with a foreigner. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 11, 2003
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)airmail.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel pump
What is the problem with it mounted directly to the bracket on the FireFly, works for us. I've seen Phantoms with them mounted directly on the engine, works for them. Keep the pulse line short 12" or less and use pulse line not the thinner wall fuel line. Is there something I and Kolb missed? jerb > > > Fireflyers, > Is there a better place to mount the mikuni fuel pump, than on the tab >under the rear lord mount that the plans call for? Have they changed the >location on the newer fireflies? Also, is there a need for a rubber washer or >grommet under the fuel pump to reduce vibration? Seems Ive seen where they >mounted a >pump on a piece of 3/4x 3/4 x1/16 angle. Thanks to those who have helped in >the past. > > Ed ( Installing 447 in Houston) > >


May 08, 2003 - June 11, 2003

Kolb-Archive.digest.vol-ei