Kolb-Archive.digest.vol-et

January 10, 2004 - February 07, 2004



      to keep tract of a simple piece of paper
      Mike Thomason
      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kelvin Kurkowski" <kkurkow(at)chase3000.com>
Subject: Old Kolb tape
Date: Jan 10, 2004
(not processed: message from valid local sender) ....dah, should have included the address in the first post, just didn't know if anyone would be interested. And thanks John H, hope the footage still survives somewhere. Kelvin Kurkowski Rt 1 Box 103 76795 Rd 332 Grant, NE 69140 no need to archive ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 10, 2004
From: "Bob N." <ronoy(at)shentel.net>
Subject: Re: First Flight!! aka bad cap.
Ok, Mike--I'll ck with RS tomorrow, and if they have one, I'll let you know, and can mail. Bob N. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: solo and capacitor question
Date: Jan 10, 2004
From my search on the list I have > determined it is probably 22,000mfd > Mike Thomason > Glasgow, Kentucky Hi Mike/All: I use a 22,000mf capacitor on my electrical system. It acts much the same as a battery eliminator when I turn off the alternator. Should work ok, unless the EIS people encourage you to use a different size. They are available from Electornic Shops or the internet. john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Heaters?
Date: Jan 10, 2004
> What's your opinion about using heat from the heads in such a > way? Any risks or down-side that you can see? > > -Ken Fackler Hi Ken/All: Folks have been using heat off exhaust manifolds, mufflers, and engines, for a long time. Model A Fords, 1928-1931, had an after market exhaust manifold heater. And, of course, VW's. However, I never had a VW (all mine were buses) heater that worked very well. The only down side I see is carbon monoxide poisoning. Other than that, something else to get attached to the airplane. I just got back from flying. We had a low of 34 and a high of 39 today. I got home about sundown and it was 35F. A lot colder out of the cockpit than in it. The Chilli Vest worked great. I set the thermostat about 75% and stayed nice and warm. BTW the sun was not shining, which is a great help to heat the cockpit when it is. I contemplated heating systems for many years and never designed and built one. Glad I didn't now. Was much simpler and cleaner to attach two wires to the battery, zip up the Chilli Vest, plug it in, and stay warm. When not in use, it folds up into a tiny package that takes little room and weighs nothing. Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 10, 2004
From: Bob Bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: First Flight!!
Mark German wrote: > >Kolbers: >I had my first flight today at 9:30am OAT was 22F > > Good work Mark, looks like eventually Kolbs might even outnumber Cessnas! -BB , still minus numbers here in W. NY > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Aaron Hollingsworth" <aaron(at)gamespeak.com>
Subject: rudder tab
Date: Jan 10, 2004
I just test flew with my rudder tab. Feels great. instead of 50% left rudder on takeoff... I need a TINY bit of right. In flight it seems pretty even. I'll fly a little more with it and see if I need to ease out a slight bit of bend. Thanks to everyone that helped me out with tips / advice on it. Aaron\MK3 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 10, 2004
From: Earl & Mim Zimmerman <emzi(at)supernet.com>
Subject: Re: Heaters?
> Prior to the 2001, or it may have been the 2000 flight, I purchased a Chilli > Vest from Sargeant MC Equip in Orlando, FL. > > http://www.sargentcycle.com/chillivest.htm > > Folks, it is still only $179.95, and worth every cent. Ok, but that's x2 if you want anybody to go with you when it's cold! -- Earl ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 10, 2004
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: solo and capacitor question
Cap's also have a voltage rating - he needs that to get one rated at least that or higher - you can always go higher but may cost more $. 22,000 mfd is a electrolytic and there is a polarity to them - you will need to install the new one with +/- terminals/wire ends matching the old one. jerb > > From my search on the list I have > > determined it is probably 22,000mfd > Mike Thomason > > Glasgow, Kentucky > >Hi Mike/All: > >I use a 22,000mf capacitor on my electrical system. It acts much the same >as a battery eliminator when I turn off the alternator. > >Should work ok, unless the EIS people encourage you to use a different size. > >They are available from Electornic Shops or the internet. > >john h > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb Database
Date: Jan 10, 2004
Guess I'm gonna hafta update my brain a little more often, and get a new 2x4 to pound the info in with. I took a quick look at the California page, and see that Jim Clayton is in Santa Clara. Hmmm.............just drove thru there yesterday, on my way to see an old friend in Marin City after leaving the Native American Artist in Santa Maria. Now, THERE's one sharp fella who's getting ready to start a Kolb. Thanks for the Photoshop help, Marty. Also stopped in Manteca, CA on the way home today to meet lurker Bob Dalton, who's also getting ready to start a Kolb. He's another nice fella, who's head works so much like mine that it's scary.............and he says it doesn't hurt, either. Travelin' Lar Do not Archive. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Building Kolb Mk III N78LB Vamoose www.gogittum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "dama" <dama(at)mindspring.com> Subject: Kolb-List: Kolb Database > > It's been a while since I mentioned it on the list but to those that are not aware, you will find the best of the Kolb-type people in the database found here... > http://www.springeraviation.net/ > > Happy Flying... > Kip > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "CRAIG M NELSON" <vitalfx0(at)msn.com>
Subject: when is your first flight
Date: Jan 10, 2004
John was up working on our web sight when I saw your post. Guess I'm not the only one kolbing late hours. have been watching your progress I like what you have done, tank, engine and all looks like you are moving at light speed. when are you planning on the first flight? my extra is still moving at a snail pace with my bud Larry doing the gap sil good luck uncle craig mk MKIIIex 912uls warp Arizona www.milow.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Heaters?
Date: Jan 11, 2004
> Ok, but that's x2 if you want anybody to go with you when it's cold! > -- Earl Earl/All: Well, I had not thought about keeping the passenger warm. I figured if anyone was crazy enough to fly with me as cold as it was yesterday, they would make arrangements to keep themselves warm. :-) Seriously, I don't have anyone that flies with me on a regular or irregular basis. I think the beauty of the Chilli Vest is the simplicity of the system, without hanging additional hardware on the aircraft, which equals weight, or inviting another inflight hazzard by routing hot water into the cockpit. For that matter, I don't like primers that route fuel into the cockpit either. To each his own, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Airgriff2(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 11, 2004
Subject: Re: First Flight!!
Mark wrote: > > > I had my first flight today at 9:30am OAT was 22F Wind was less then 5. > Flight lasted 35 minuets. The Kolbra handled better than expected. Way to go on your first flight in the Kolbra. Glad all went well. What a feeling huh? Wish you many hrs. of safe flying. Bob Griffin ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: New owner of a MK III
Date: Jan 11, 2004
Giovanni, Depending on what kind of dope/paint you have, you might have difficulty if it is 97 vintage stuff also. The pigments have no doubt setteled out, and become sludge in the bottom of the can. I know for instance that at Wicks aircraft supply, they go thru all their Poly-Tone stock and use a shaker on each can once a month. I would call the distributor of the brand and ask their advice. I believe I also would take it all to a paint store and have them use a mechanical shaker on each can, then open and try a test on a small frame covered with scraps of dacron or something. AS far as that engine...it is really hard to say. Humidity conditions are different everywhere and in everones home...If he had airconditioning it would be a better chance all is ok. If no one spilled Coca-cola on the "end-table" that leaked down onto the engine...if the engine was wrapped in plastic...6 or 7 years is a long time. If he had children like mine....an anvil might have a hard time surviving in the living room as an end table for 7 years! Good luck, and welcome to the wonderful world of Kolb ownership! Don Gherardini FireFly 098 http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "CRAIG M NELSON" <vitalfx0(at)msn.com>
Subject: Fw: The Good News That Isn't In Print
Date: Jan 11, 2004
Fellow kolbers this doesn't directly related to my airplane but I think it's worth a reed uncle craig MKIIIex 912uls warp Arizona www.milows.com The Good News That Isn't In Print The following is an email message sent to all First Marine Air Wing and Marine Wing Support Squadron 171 from LtCol Scot S. Seitz, Commanding Officer, on Monday, December 1, 2003. It's worth reading and sharing. Marines and Sailors, As we approach the end of the year, I think it is important to share a few thoughts about what you've accomplished directly, in some cases, and indirectly in many others. I am speaking about what the Bush Administration and each of you has contributed by wearing the uniform, because the fact that you wear the uniform contributes 100% to the capability of the nation to send a few onto the field to execute national policy. As you read about these achievements you are a part of, I would call your attention to two things: 1. This is good news that hasn't been fit to print or report on TV. 2. It is much easier to point out the errors a man makes when he makes the tough decisions, rarely is the positive as aggressively pursued. Since President Bush declared an end to major combat on May 1. . . . . . the first battalion of the new Iraqi Army has graduated and is on active duty. . . . over 60,000 Iraqis now provide security to their fellow citizens. . . . nearly all of Iraq's 400 courts are functioning. . . . the Iraqi judiciary is fully independent. . . . on Monday, October 6, power generation hit 4,518 megawatts-exceeding the prewar average. . . . all 22 universities and 43 technical institutes and colleges are open, as are nearly all primary and secondary schools. . . . by October 1, Coalition forces had rehab-ed over 1,500 schools-500 more than scheduled. . . . teachers earn from 12 to 25 times their former salaries. . . . all 240 hospitals and more than 1,200 clinics are open. . . . doctors salaries are at least eight times what they were under Saddam. . . . pharmaceutical distribution has gone from essentially nothing to 700 tons in May to a current total of 12,000 tons. . . . the Coalition has! helped administer over 22 million vaccinations to Iraq's children. . . a Coalition program has cleared over 14,000 kilometers of Iraq's 27,000 kilometers of weed-choked canals which now irrigate tens of thousands of farms. This project has created jobs for more than 100,000 Iraqi men and women. . . . we have restored over three-quarters of prewar telephone services and over two-thirds of the potable water production. . . there are 4,900 full-service telephone connections. We expect 50,000 by year-end. the wheels of commerce are turning. From bicycles to satellite dishes to cars and trucks, businesses are coming to life in all major cities and towns. . . . 95 percent of all prewar bank customers have service and first-time customers are opening accounts daily. . . . Iraqi banks are making loans to finance businesses. . . . the central bank is fully independent. . . . Iraq has one of the world's most growth-oriented investment and banking laws. . . . Iraq has a single, unified currency for the first time in 15 years. . . . satellite TV dishes are legal. . . . foreign journalists aren't on 10-day visas paying mandatory and extortionate fees to the Ministry of Information for "minders" and other government spies. . . . there is no Ministry of Information. . . . there are more than 170 newspapers. . . . you can buy satellite dishes on what seems like every street corner. . . . foreign journalists (and everyone else) are free to come and go. . . a nation that had not one single element-legislative, judicial or executive-of a representative government, now does. . . . in Baghdad alone, residents have selected 88 advisory councils. Baghdad's first democratic transfer of power in 35 years happened when the city council elected its new chairman. . today in Iraq, chambers of commerce, business, school and professional organizations are electing their leaders all over the country. . . . 25 ministers, selected by the most representative governing body in Iraq's history, run the day-to-day business of government. the Iraqi government regularly participates in international events. Since July, the Iraqi government has been represented in over two dozen international meetings, including those of the UN General Assembly, the Arab League, the World Bank and IMF and, today, the Islamic Conference Summit. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs today announced that it is reopening over 30 Iraqi embassies around the world. . . . Shia religious festivals that were all but banned, aren't. . . for the first time in 35 years, in Karbala thousands of Shiites celebrate the pilgrimage of the 12th Imam. . . . the Coalition has completed over 13,000 reconstruction projects, large and small, as part of a strategic plan for the reconstruction of Iraq. . . . Uday and Qusay are dead-and no longer feeding innocent Iraqis to the zoo lions, raping the young daughters of local leaders to force cooperation, torturing Iraq's soccer players for losing games, or murdering critics. . . . children aren't imprisoned or murdered when their parents disagree with the government. . . . political opponents aren't imprisoned, tortured, executed, maimed, or are forced to watch their families die for disagreeing with Saddam. . . . millions of longsuffering Iraqis no longer live in perpetual terror. . . . Saudis will hold municipal elections. . . . Qatar is reforming education to give more choices to parents. . . . Jordan is accelerating market economic reforms. . . . the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded for the first time to an Iranian-a Muslim woman who speaks out with courage for human rights, for democracy and for peace. . . . Saddam is gone. . . . Iraq is free. . . . President Bush has not faltered or failed. . . . Yet, little or none of this information has been published by the Press corps that prides itself on bringing you all the news that's important. Iraq under US-led control has come further in six months than Germany did in seven years or Japan did in nine years following WWII. Military deaths from fanatic Nazi's and Japanese numbered in the thousands and continued for over three years after WWII victory was declared. It took the US over four months to clear away the twin tower debris, let alone attempt to build something else in its place. Now, take into account that almost every Democrat leader in the House and Senate has fought President Bush on every aspect of his handling of this country's war and the post-war reconstruction, and that they continue to claim on a daily basis on national TV that this conflict has been a failure. Taking everything into consideration, event the unfortunate loss of our brothers and sisters in this conflict, do you think anyone else in the world could have accomplished as much as the United States and the Bush administration in so short a period of time? These are things worth writing about. Get the word out. Write to someone you think may be able to influence our Congress or the press to tell the story. Above all, be proud that you are a part of this historical precedent. God bless you all. Have a great Holiday. Semper Fidelis, LtCol Scot S Seitz ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Clay Stuart" <tcstuart(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: markers
Date: Jan 11, 2004
Here is an item that might be handy for the builder: http://www.ishopwiz.com/4/4-1670.html It is a set of retractable fine tip markers that can be used one-handed. Avery Marks-A-Lot Retractable Fine Tip Marker. No top to lose. I got some at Office Depot and I also saw some at Walmart. I was always misplacing tops before and letting mine dry out. Clay Stuart Building Mark IIIXtra Danville KY ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "boyd young" <by0ung(at)brigham.net>
Subject: egt probes
Date: Jan 10, 2004
This past fall, one side of my dual egt guage went to 0. I flew with it that way for a month and the second side went to 0. ------------------------ the egt probes are thermocouples simular to those used on water heaters and furnaces.... they produce up to 30 mv of power when heated..... i have seen them last 15 - 20 years... and as little as a few months.... i would sugest that you heat it up and test with a dc milivolt meter and check the output... if it seems ok then check the wireing. to heat it up it could be removed and heated with a match, candle, or a torch on low heat.. boyd ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 12, 2004
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: markers
The best markers I've used are the German made ones - they often have a pinkish color to the body and are often sold at larger graphic stores. Brand is Stabilo - Permanent Fine Tip While building parts for an RV-6 I tried the Sharpies, they draw about one or two lines on aluminum sheet metal and then do not want to write any more. Pilots work but there very fine tips don't last long and dry out faster than the German brand. Haven't tried the Mark's-A-Lot brand. I've lost my local source for the German ones, last batch I got while working in Australia. Any body knows of mail order place that carries them PLEASE let me know. Thanks, jerb > >Here is an item that might be handy for the builder: > >http://www.ishopwiz.com/4/4-1670.html > >It is a set of retractable fine tip markers that can be used >one-handed. Avery Marks-A-Lot Retractable Fine Tip Marker. No top to >lose. I got some at Office Depot and I also saw some at Walmart. I was >always misplacing tops before and letting mine dry out. > >Clay Stuart >Building Mark IIIXtra >Danville KY > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 12, 2004
From: "Bob N." <ronoy(at)shentel.net>
Subject: Re: markers
This has come up several times before, BUTT don't mark aluminum with a lead (graphite) pencil. May cause corrosion. Marking pens OK. Bob N. really old aircraft sheet metal mech ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 12, 2004
From: "Bob N." <ronoy(at)shentel.net>
Subject: Re: solo and capacitor question
Yep, Herb, you're right about the plethora of mostly good parts on junked electronics. The problem is that most of the components are sitting on ckt boards with leads almost too short to splice. And locally we have to PAY $ to junk stuff! Bob N. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 12, 2004
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: markers
It has been established cracks have formed along the pencil mark line. It's considered a no-no in aircraft construction industry to use pencil marking aluminum. jerb > >This has come up several times before, BUTT don't mark aluminum with a >lead (graphite) pencil. May cause corrosion. Marking pens OK. > >Bob N. really old aircraft sheet metal mech > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DMe5430944(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 12, 2004
Subject: Re: Kolb-List Digest: 22 Msgs - 01/11/04
I agree, lets keep the Kolb list intact for what it is intended, not world news or such Don Mekeel Firefly No 002 El Paso, Texas ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Gherkins Tim-rp3420 <rp3420(at)motorola.com>
Subject: Rotax Carb Heaters-4 sale
Date: Jan 12, 2004
Kolbers, All this talk about heaters reminded me I have some carb heaters. No need for carb heaters in the Sonoran desert. So I have a pair for sale. Designed for 2 stroke, Bing 54 series Rotax engines. They are new, never used. Anyone interested in the cold parts of the country, I am taking offers. let me know off the list at:< rp3420(at)email.sps.mot.com > Thanks, Tim ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 12, 2004
From: "Bob N." <ronoy(at)shentel.net>
Subject: Re: solo and capacitor question
OK, ever-buddy hole whatcha got. I was just looking for a cap for "Mike Thomason" By now he may hopefully be near to flying! Mike, talk to Herb... herbgh(at)juno.com Bob N. way over an' out ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "CRAIG M NELSON" <vitalfx0(at)msn.com>
Subject: calling
Date: Jan 12, 2004
Kolbers no moor stuff. just kolb related. sorry to be sooooooooooooo rude to put any stupid petty things on the site, my fault. sorry. Hay, I work on the MKIII every day, getting real close, the gap sill is finally done!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I put some pictures on the web site showing techniques I used to make the calling today if any one is interested. again sorry for the lat post. uncle craig MKIIIex 912uls warp arizona www.milows.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 12, 2004
Subject: Re: solo and capacitor question
From: herbgh(at)juno.com
Hi Bob Yep! Met Mike at a flyin at Franklin Ky. Was going to go over to his place near Glasgow and look his plane over. Glad to give him a hand if he needs it. I will email him and extend the offer---Mike are you listening??? Herb in Scottsville. KY > > OK, ever-buddy hole whatcha got. I was just looking for a cap for > "Mike Thomason" > > By now he may hopefully be near to flying! > > Mike, talk to Herb... > herbgh(at)juno.com > > Bob N. way over an' out > > > = > = > = > = > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 12, 2004
From: "Bob N." <ronoy(at)shentel.net>
Subject: Beauford's add?
Anyone have a Good add fer ol' Beauford? I keep getting a reject notice, saying... over quota... What quota? Is he rationed? Bob N. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: calling
Date: Jan 13, 2004
Tell ya what Craig....that is a great site..good looking bird too!.....now I know how ya got it all done tho....maybe when ya get done here soon ya could send Lt Dan or Slick over here to give me a hand too! Don Gherardini FireFly 098 http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: grind carbon? danger!
From: Jim Gerken <gerken(at)us.ibm.com>
Date: Jan 13, 2004
01/13/2004 07:43:43 AM >The warp drive with its solid carbon construction would seem an ideal >blade for this kind of shaping... although it probably isn't easy to >grind carbon fibers >Topher Please do not grind or sand carbon without carefull dust control. Particles of carbon are very bad news to your lungs, like asbestos. Jim Gerken ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GeoR38(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 13, 2004
Subject: Re: solo and capacitor question
In a message dated 1/10/04 4:03:56 PM Eastern Standard Time, ronoy(at)shentel.net writes: > > Fergot, it's a big electrolytic capacitor---aka a "condenser" to some. > > Bob N. > > If'n ya can't find the exact duplicate anywhere, just make sure you match its Working Volts DC and Capacitance Value in Mfd to expect a seamless repair. George Randolph ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GeoR38(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 13, 2004
Subject: Re: solo and capacitor question
In a message dated 1/10/04 9:56:26 PM Eastern Standard Time, jtripp(at)elmore.rr.com writes: > Mike, > I've got the capacitor that came with my EIS right here in my hand. It is > blue and about 1" long with a wire out the top and one out the bottom. It > comes from BC and the label on it says 2200 yf .16V. Actually, it's not > really a y but a backward y like you're looking at it in a mirror. Hope that > helps. > > James Tripp > FS II > that is the greek letter mu meaning micro or in this case times 10 to the minus 6 or millionths. so the capacitor value is 2thousand 2 hundred micro farads. Another way to look at it is.... .0022 farads. 1,000,000 micro farads equals one farad. One farad is a helluva big capacitor (for the rednecks in the group). But your capacitor is only 2 thousandths that size.....kinda like the mach business. A jet goes mach one which is the speed of sound at 760 mph. Kolbers go 50/760 or .066 mach. All this plus a little money will purchase a cup of java. just trying to be helpful and put into proper perspective. George Randolph...the Villages obviously I miss my Firestar which is stuck in Ohio, now ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GeoR38(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 13, 2004
Subject: Re: calling
In a message dated 1/12/04 7:25:55 PM Eastern Standard Time, vitalfx0(at)msn.com writes: > I put some pictures on the web site showing techniques I used to make the > calling today if any one is interested. > again sorry for the lat post. > uncle craig > MKIIIex 912uls warp > arizona www.milows.com > > no apologies necessary for me buddy, I'm glad you posted it and I learned from it and the other opposite view as well. Every now and then that stuff is ok by me. George Randolph firestar driver ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 13, 2004
From: Jack & Louise Hart <jbhart(at)ldd.net>
Subject: FireFly & Propeller Off Set
Kolbers, I got to fly to day for the first times since Thanksgiving Day. Some days were flyable, but the FireFly was not. On the day before Thanksgiving one of the bands for the brakes broke. I tied off the cable so that I had a brake on one wheel only. After the Thanksgiving Day flight for the grandchildren, the other band broke. I increased band thickness and recycled the braking material. I got the new bands installed Sunday. It was the first day warm enough so that tools did not bite. Also, I rotated the engine belt reducer so that it is 90 degrees to the left and remounted the IVO propeller. Monday, I attempted to fly, but one of the magnetos was shorted. Today, I put some booster springs to help retract the fish line to the engine mounted magneto kill switches, and it solved the problem. Taxied to burn in the new brake bands, and then flew for about ten minutes. With the new thrust position, the ball is centered at cruise. Turning/banking to the left requires little to no rudder for a coordinated turn. Flight time was too short to evaluate pitch trim, but the thrust line is 5.5 inches to the left and 2.17 inches below that of the Rotax 447. I hope the weather will be good for this coming Sunday and the local EAA Chapter 453 meeting. If the thrust line is helping, it should show up on a two hour trip in reduced fuel consumption and better ground speed. I thought the Powerfin was a quieter propeller than the IVO but after a long flight, I thought the opposite. And so, I have ordered a noise/sound meter so that I can objectively measure the sound in the cockpit while in flight. After I get noise readings, I will be cutting the IVO so that it will clear the tail tube with the belt reducer rotated 135 degrees to the left. This will put the thrust line 3.89 inches to the left and 6.06 inches below that of the Rotax 447. Then I will cut the IVO tips to Terry's new tip. Jack B. Hart FF004 Jackson, MO Jack & Louise Hart jbhart(at)ldd.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: calling
Date: Jan 13, 2004
Hi Craig/All: ----- Original Message ----- From: "CRAIG M NELSON" <vitalfx0(at)msn.com> Subject: Kolb-List: calling I put some pictures on the web site showing techniques I used to make the calling today if any one is interested. > MKIIIex 912uls warp ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: calling
Date: Jan 13, 2004
> I put some pictures on the web site showing techniques I used to make the calling today if any one is interested. > uncle craig Craig/Gang: Enjoyed looking at your pics. Noticed you had painted your engine mount "rails", or the aluminum angles. I did the same thing first time I mounted the 912. After a short period of time the four engine mount bolts throught the angle and into the engine cases became slightly loose. Loose enough to start the tell tale signs of some black streaks from aluminum rubbing on aluminum. I retightened several times before I realized what was happening. Vibration was wearing away the paint and primer, loosening the torqued engine bolts. Next set of angle I installed I did not paint and eliminated the problem. Sitting here thinking about it, "hind sight", I could have masked the small area of contact with the engine case and painted the rest of the angle. Another thing that caught my eye was the long run of aluminum oil tubing from the bottom of the engine case and the oil pump to the forward end of the engine, where it then attaches to flexible oil line to the tank. My question is: Have you given any thought to the possibility of vibration and stress cracking and failure of this hard mounted tubing? Personally, I would keep all these lines flexible to prevent any chance of failure. I admit the aluminum looks very professional and clean, but am concerned about hard mounting anything to the engine, 2 or 4 stroke. I like the cooling tower. With intake air passing through the radiator and oil cooler prior to arriving to the carbs, should be no need for additional carb heat to prent carb ice. Did I ever tell you guys about sleeping on the tarmac at Gila Bend, AZ, airport last May. Woke up about 0600 to find a drunk in a pickup truck parked right next to me on the parking pad. He had the drivers door open and his feet sticking out. With all the room on that newly paved parking pad, I would have thought maybe he would have parked way over on the other side, rather than right up next to me. Anyhow, he was very quiet coming in because I did not know he was there until I rolled over in my sleeping bag to see him there. As I was getting out of my bag the drunk woke up and it turned out to be Uncle Craig, not a drunk at all. He had driven 110 miles from Phoenix to Gila Bend to see Miss P'fer, was afraid he would have missed her had he waited until later to drive down. We had a great visit before I had to depart for Sierra Vista to try and locate one of our past members of the Kolb List. Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "CRAIG M NELSON" <vitalfx0(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: calling
Date: Jan 13, 2004
----- Original Message ----- From: John Hauck Subject: Re: Kolb-List: calling -->John hauck wrote Another thing that caught my eye was the long run of aluminum oil tubing from the bottom of the engine case and the oil pump to the forward end of the engine, where it then attaches to flexible oil line to the tank. My question is: Have you given any thought to the possibility of vibration and Take care, john h Yes. if you look in the pictures you will see the adel clamps that hold the lines to the engine. uncle craig MKIIIex 912uls warp arizona www.milows.com ps all soelling courtiessy of weibestier including couwelleing ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 13, 2004
From: Bob Bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: oncle craig
OK guys, ONKLE CRAIG had me going for awhile two. Half too admit tho he is fonetikly keerect. Some translatin': calling=cowling.....sill=seal Yer a great craftsman craig, keep up the good work, hope to see your bird fly over my head some day. -BB, MkIII N3851E in storage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: : Kolb-List:ENGINE MOUNT RAILS
Date: Jan 13, 2004
> I wonder if it was the paint only. I remember you talking about a thicker aluminum angle or something heavier angle when you installed the 912uls. so I formed a thick washer that has the sane contour as the angle rail and now the bolt head and washer are tight against the base of the angle aluminum. your thoughts john? > uncle craig Craig/Folks: The problem with paint and primer errosion between engine case bolts and vertical arm of aluminum angle occurred early on on a set of 1/4" thick angle. I feel the problem of loosing torque on these four bolts was paint and primer wearing away. My new 3/8" thick angle was fabricated for me by John Russell, former Sling Shot builder and flyer, at Rome Plow in Rome, Ga. The inside filet was relieved by a vertical milling machine to allow the washer to sit flat on the bottom arm of the angle. I believe the mill they used radius'd 90 deg angle to prevent stress cracking. After 620 hours it is performing flawlessly. Have not retorqued the four case bolts since initial installation. Your thick washers should work well. john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: calling
Date: Jan 13, 2004
> Yes. if you look in the pictures you will see the adel clamps that hold the lines to the engine. > uncle craig > MKIIIex 912uls warp Craig/All: Yes, looked at pics, did see adel clamps, and still question how long those lines will last before failure. They may last forever in that configuration, but I choose to use flex hose from sump and pump to tank. I know that system works. :-) john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Williamson" <kolbrapilot(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: : Kolb-List:ENGINE MOUNT RAILS
Date: Jan 13, 2004
Hi Craig, I had the same problem of the washer and bolt head touching the radius of the AL angle. I rounded off a standard washer and put another one on top of it. John Williamson Arlington, TX ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Lawton" <skyrider2(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb-List Digest: 22 Msgs - 01/11/04
Date: Jan 14, 2004
John, I agree. I was on a long xc in a Mooney many years ago (early 70's) and had a fuel leak in the cockpit. Scared the bejeezus out of me. Can't remember now just why it happened, some line to a guage or something. But I do remember fuel in the floorboard on the passenger side, being at altitude when it happened, and landing in Daytona because of it. Cockpits are not a good place for fuel. Fly Safely, Doug john h wrote: ...For that matter, I don't like primers that route fuel into the cockpit either. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 14, 2004
From: "Mike Pierzina" <planecrazzzy(at)lycos.com>
Subject: New Web Site
Hey Guys, I've finally built a web site...200 pictures. http://www.geocities.com/planecrazzzy/Planecrazzzy.html Gotta Fly... Mike in MN --- Sometimes you just have to take the leap and build your wings on the way down... Gotta Fly... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "boyd young" <by0ung(at)brigham.net>
Subject: Re: carb ice
Date: Jan 14, 2004
I like the cooling tower. With intake air passing through the radiator and oil cooler prior to arriving to the carbs, should be no need for additional carb heat to prent carb ice. =============== it has been proven that if you heat up realy cold air to just above the freezing point then cool it with the evaporation of the gas that you will make carb ice... where you would not if the air was not heated. boyd ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Fackler, Ken" <kfackler(at)ameritech.net>
Subject: Kolbers in Ottawa
Date: Jan 15, 2004
I'm leaving next Tuesday for about 10 days up on Ottawa on business. Any Kolbers up there who might want to get together for a burger and a beer at some point? -Ken Fackler Kolb Mark II / A722KWF Rochester MI ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 17, 2004
From: "Gene D." <gdledbetter(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Panama City Beach Run
Florida Kolbers, I pulled my Trailer and Firefly to Panacea again and have already enjoyed the pleasure of flying with Duane The Plane 3 days this week. Had a heck of a problem getting the trailer out of the lower level parking spot at my airport with all of the rain we had been having. Hooked up and just spun the wheels.. Threw lots of mud. Weather finally got cold enough to freeze the ground so I could get the trailer out. Had to taxi the firefly a couple of blocks to the trailer so decided to take it around the patch at 18F. Boy, it jumped into the air and the engine pulled strong but hot since I didn't bother to adjust the mixture a notch or two. Wondered if anyone might be trying to make a beach run this year from Panama City to Panacea as has been done in the past. Last year the run was rained out two weekends in a row and didn't happen. I'll only be here a month this year since I need to be at home to help my honey plan the wedding. Old love is better than young love. Take my word for it. Gene ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Elder" <billelder(at)denver.net>
Subject: Hand Pump for Fueling
Date: Jan 17, 2004
It's very difficult and awkward for me to fill the fuel tanks on my Mark III Classic with the standard 5 gal fuel tanks. Anyone know of a good hand pump that will tranfer fuel from a five gal tank? I'm trying to avoid an electric pump. Thanks guys. Bill in Colorado ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: drop nose kolb
Date: Jan 17, 2004
> it seems that i saw john w come into monument valley last may..... it seems he had a drop nose allready...... john h saw it as well. > > boyd Boyd/All: Yep. There we were, drinking coffee by the big window in the resturant overlooking the airstrip, when in flies a Kolb Kolbra. Taxied around to the tie down cable, increased power, and the nose actually drooped, all the way down to the red dust and dirt of Monument Valley. Boyd and I both thought a small Concorde had arrived. Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Re: Vamoose
Date: Jan 17, 2004
Looking at this pic again, and another question comes to mind. I mentioned quite a while ago that the windshield had been sandblasted while sitting in my driveway. I polished it out 3 times by hand, and got it to where you can see thru it, but it's still a little foggy, as you can see in the picture on the webpage below. Sight thru the lexan on the top 1/3. If I go very gently with the power random orbit sander with a fleece cup cover, and the Novus #2 that I used in my previous efforts, do you think that'll hurt the lexan ?? Thanks Lar. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Building Kolb Mk III N78LB Vamoose www.gogittum.com > > Today, I finally brought Vamoose home after 4 months of being jerked around, so now might even get something accomplished. The new landing gear looks great, but the A&P really ripped me off on the price..............double what was expected. You can see it at: http://www.flyingpics.homestead.com/gear1.html . Now, just gotta paint it. I had planned on powder coating, but Tom Kuffel raised the question of flexing. Before checking on that, I called the heat treating shop, and they told me NOT to powder coat the legs. Anything over 300 deg. F., will start to degrade the R48 hardness ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Hand Pump for Fueling
Date: Jan 17, 2004
> It's very difficult and awkward for me to fill the fuel tanks on my Mark III Classic with the standard 5 gal fuel tanks. Anyone know of a good hand pump that will tranfer fuel from a five gal tank? I'm trying to avoid an electric pump. Thanks guys. Bill in Colorado Bill E/Gang: I have posted this several times before. I use about six feet of vinyl tubing pushed over the spout of the gas can. The tubing is long enough to put one end in the tank first, then attach the other end to the spout. Pick the gas can up and fuel will transfer very rapidly. I use this system to refuel the filler on top and aft on the gap seal. Works great. I'm pushing 65 and can still handle the 5 gal cans ok. I figure if I get to the point where I can't hold 5 gal of gas over my head to refuel, I'll go to 2.5 gal. No sweat. Price is the cost of the vinyl tubing, or for that matter, any other tubing that will have a nice snug fit over the end of the pour spout. I like the vinyl because it is clear and I can see what's happening. Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dale Sellers" <dsel1(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Hand Pump for Fueling
Date: Jan 17, 2004
I got mine from Northern tools. Comes with an adapter to let screw on most any size opening. Wirks really good and cost only bout ten bucks. Dale Sellers ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Elder" <billelder(at)denver.net> Subject: Kolb-List: Hand Pump for Fueling > > It's very difficult and awkward for me to fill the fuel tanks on my Mark III Classic with the standard 5 gal fuel tanks. Anyone know of a good hand pump that will tranfer fuel from a five gal tank? I'm trying to avoid an electric pump. Thanks guys. Bill in Colorado > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Fackler, Ken" <kfackler(at)ameritech.net>
Subject: Re: Hand Pump for Fueling
Date: Jan 17, 2004
I hear you loud and clear on this one, Bill! I was hoisting five gallons cans over my head until last summer when I tore a muscle in my lower back doing that. I tried all sorts of solutions, and got many suggestions from the list. What I finally did was to order a 28 gal Gas Caddy with the hand-operated Rotary Pump. It's on wheels, and fuel feed hose is about 10 feet long, so I just wheel that sucker up behind my plane, insert the fuel nozzle, and twirl that crank. I particularly like that the pump is high-flow, approx 10 turns per gallon, and that it's a two-way pump, i.e., you can run it backwards to suck the fuel out if need be. The unit is UL approved. http://www.toddusa.com/index.html The website above is to the supplier I bought it from. The picture on the far right is the actual item. Click on the text just above that picture to go to their online catalog. I don't wanna sound like a commercial, but I've been very happy with this unit -and- the customer service provided by the company. -Ken Fackler (248) 601-0566 Kolb Mark II / A722KWF Rochester MI ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Elder" <billelder(at)denver.net> Subject: Kolb-List: Hand Pump for Fueling > > It's very difficult and awkward for me to fill the fuel tanks on my Mark III Classic with the standard 5 gal fuel tanks. Anyone know of a good hand pump that will tranfer fuel from a five gal tank? I'm trying to avoid an electric pump. Thanks guys. Bill in Colorado > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mhqqqqq(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 17, 2004
Subject: Re: Hand Pump for Fueling
I buy gas 50 gals. at a time, I mix it with 1 gal of oil. (don't send anything to me about old gas, I know about the loss of octane and all that stuff) I have a truck come and fill a 55 gal. barrel. I have a barrel pump that I got at harbor freight tools. it is the best way I found to do this. lots of people at my air field do it like this and have been doing it for a long time (10 years or more) ps. I get 92 octane fuel, alcohol free. 92 octane is not the point, alcohol free is. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 17, 2004
From: Robert Laird <rlaird(at)cavediver.com>
Subject: Re: Hand Pump for Fueling
At 10:26 AM 1/17/2004, you wrote: > >I hear you loud and clear on this one, Bill! I was hoisting five gallons >cans over my head until last summer when I tore a muscle in my lower back >doing that. I tried all sorts of solutions, and got many suggestions from >the list. What I finally did was to order a 28 gal Gas Caddy with the >hand-operated Rotary Pump. It's on wheels, and fuel feed hose is about 10 >feet long, so I just wheel that sucker up behind my plane, insert the fuel >nozzle, and twirl that crank. I particularly like that the pump is >high-flow, approx 10 turns per gallon, and that it's a two-way pump, i.e., >you can run it backwards to suck the fuel out if need be. The unit is UL >approved. > >http://www.toddusa.com/index.html > >The website above is to the supplier I bought it from. The picture on the >far right is the actual item. Click on the text just above that picture to >go to their online catalog. > >I don't wanna sound like a commercial, but I've been very happy with this >unit -and- the customer service provided by the company. Northern Tool has it at a good price: http://www.northerntool.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?xsell=33649&storeId=6970&productId=9950&langId=-1 -- Robert ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Hand Pump for Fueling
Date: Jan 17, 2004
> I buy gas 50 gals. at a time, I mix it with 1 gal of oil. > (don't send anything to me about old gas, I know about the loss of octane > and all that stuff) Hi Mhqqqqq/All: Is that your real name? Seems like you have all the answers, so I have a question. Is there any problem with fuel/oil seperation, should this 50 gal of fuel and gal of oil sit for an extended period of time, like and month or so? Thanks, john h BTW: What is your real name? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jo and Larry" <joandlp(at)starband.net>
Subject: Firestar II trade?
Date: Jan 17, 2004
Would be interested in trading a 2000 Kolb Firestar II for a dual control 2 seater. Would prefer side by side of same or lesser value such as Mark III, Avid, Kitfox, etc. Would look at the right tandem. Firestar has 0 hour airframe, 150 hr DCDI 503 w/ elect st, oil inj. full encl other opt. email for information and pics. Thanks , Larry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 17, 2004
From: Jimmy <jhankin(at)planters.net>
Subject: Altimeter
Anyone on the list know of a repair facility for a altimeter that has the adjust knob broken off. Called Aircraft Spruce, it is listed in their catalog. No name of it only "Made in China". They could not help. Would it hurt the instrument to open it up to see if I could replace the stud? Jimmy Hankinson 912-863-7384 Rocky Ford, Ga. 30455 jhankin(at)planters.net Kolb Firefly/447/275hrs Local field, Pegasus/2000/Grass Airport JYL/Sylvania, Ga. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "flykolb" <flykolb(at)carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Hand Pump for Fueling
Date: Jan 17, 2004
Bill, I bought a self priming hose from NAPA or Northern Tools (under $10) and a four foot aluminum ladder from Lowe's (also about $10). I put my 5 gal gas can on the ladder, get the gas flowing and in a matter of minutes the fuel is transferred. This way I do not have to hold the 5 gal of gas or pour it. Works great and I can take the hose with me when I fly cross country. Then I just put one foot on the tire of the plane, rest the gas can on my knee, and it works the same way. Jim Mark III Charlotte, NC ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Elder" <billelder(at)denver.net> Subject: Kolb-List: Hand Pump for Fueling > > It's very difficult and awkward for me to fill the fuel tanks on my Mark III Classic with the standard 5 gal fuel tanks. Anyone know of a good hand pump that will tranfer fuel from a five gal tank? I'm trying to avoid an electric pump. Thanks guys. Bill in Colorado > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 17, 2004
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Altimeter
Wouldn't hurt it a bit, it is not rocket science. Probably a small length of brass tubing from the hobby shop and a little JB Weld... There is an instrument repair facility in Atlanta, don't remember the name, but they could fix if you can't cob something that works. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > >Anyone on the list know of a repair facility for a altimeter that has the >adjust knob broken off. > >Called Aircraft Spruce, it is listed in their catalog. No name of it >only "Made in >China". They could not help. > >Would it hurt the instrument to open it up to see if I could replace the stud? > >Jimmy Hankinson >912-863-7384 >Rocky Ford, Ga. 30455 >jhankin(at)planters.net >Kolb Firefly/447/275hrs >Local field, Pegasus/2000/Grass >Airport JYL/Sylvania, Ga. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 17, 2004
From: "Bob N." <ronoy(at)shentel.net>
Subject: laser level
Costco has a laser level at $12.99. Has 16" Al level with both laser and bubble. Puts out either dot or cross. Also a kinda pocket-penlite laser with bubble, batts for both, and a pr of tinted sunglasses to use when operation in direct sunlight. Bob N. http://www.angelfire.com/rpg/ronoy/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MEMATUZAK(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 18, 2004
Subject: Re: Self priming Fueling n still flying :)
I do the same as Jim. A self priming hose that I bought at SnF, $8. It has a brass valve that acts as a one way valve. You shake it up n down to start the flow and you never have to touch raw fuel. Easy to carry and you can't be the price. XC I carry it with me to top off at a friends. As for you icebergs, yesterday flew the beach. Its whale season in our neck of the woods. Didn't see any but I've got the best seat around. The spotters are shorebound and stationary. I'm mobile both horz and vert. later Mike Matuszczak Palm Coast FL ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Lexan
Date: Jan 18, 2004
Not a single reply on my lexan question, either. Hmmmm.................??? Lar. Larry/All: After a few years of wearing out Lexan, not Plexiglass, I have found if a good cleaning and waxing with a quality automotive wax does not give satisfactory results, replace the Lexan with new stuff. I have found Lexan to be much softer and much less scratch resistant and repairable than Plexiglass. However, the beauty of Lexan is it toughness and ability to protect me should I happen to fly through red oak tree limbs, by keeping them and other objects out of the cockpit. Now, does that feel better? or were you looking for someone to tell you how to repair the old Lexan so you would not have to spend another dime to replace? :-) I have heard from some folks on this list, that repairing Lexan is quite possible, but I have not found the secret formula. Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 18, 2004
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Hand Pump for Fueling
One to carry with you or one for your home base. Northern Tool sells a Blue aluminum rotating hand crank pump ($25-$28) that works fairly well. Takes about 16-17 easy cranks per gallon. Only thing is adapting hoses to the thing but it can be done. Made a little cart from one of Harbor Freights small flat bed dolly's they sell. You can sit you tank of fuel on it and wheel it out to the plane - never refuel in the hangar bad ideal. If you have a little time you can use a Facet electric fuel pump available at most NAPA auto parts stores - get the highest fuel rate model ($30-35$- still expect 10-15 minutes to transfer 5 gallons. It can be mounted in the plane and you can have a self sealing quick disconnect on the pump allowing a removable hose. SkySports the outfit that advertises in UL Flying magazine sells two types of the quick disconnects, self sealing and not sealing models. These are good folks the do business with by the way. I gotten all my instruments through them good prices and - no failures so far. I am a very happy camper with their service and their products. jerb > >It's very difficult and awkward for me to fill the fuel tanks on my Mark >III Classic with the standard 5 gal fuel tanks. Anyone know of a good >hand pump that will tranfer fuel from a five gal tank? I'm trying to >avoid an electric pump. Thanks guys. Bill in Colorado > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Re: Lexan
Date: Jan 18, 2004
Yah, grumble, grumble. Seems like every time I turn around I hafta bite the bullet and spend more and more money. I'm not a cheapskate by any stretch of the imagination, but this thing is completely out of hand. (pocket ??) Yah, yah, I'll buy the bloody lexan................but I sure had hopes, and how do ya know if'n ya don't ask ?? Lar. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Building Kolb Mk III N78LB Vamoose www.gogittum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com> Subject: Kolb-List: Lexan > > > Not a single reply on my lexan question, either. Hmmmm.................??? > Lar. > > Larry/All: > > After a few years of wearing out Lexan, not Plexiglass, I have found if a > good cleaning and waxing with a quality automotive wax does not give > satisfactory results, replace the Lexan with new stuff. > > I have found Lexan to be much softer and much less scratch resistant and > repairable than Plexiglass. However, the beauty ________________________________________________________________________________
From: loyd.peterson(at)att.net
Subject: MK3 Extra
Date: Jan 18, 2004
Ordered a quick build at the September 03 fly-in at London-delivery expected any day. Is it possible to request an N number from the FAA prior to buying an engine and knowing the engine serial number/make etc? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Clay Stuart" <tcstuart(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: lexan
Date: Jan 18, 2004
Here is an article about restoring plexiglass in an airplane. It should apply to Lexan also. http://ronkilber.tripod.com/acrylic/acrylic.htm Clay Stuart building Mark IIIXtra Danville KY ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Duncan McBride" <duncanmcbride(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: MK3 Extra
Date: Jan 18, 2004
I don't think I needed the engine serial number just to reserve an n-number. Check this page - http://av-info.faa.gov/dst/amateur/ I believe AC20-27F has the procedure and the address to apply for a custom n-number. I reserved my number about a year and a half before I actually registered it. I think it was $10 to start and $5/year to keep it reserved. Duncan McBride 319DM ----- Original Message ----- From: <loyd.peterson(at)att.net> Subject: Kolb-List: MK3 Extra > > Ordered a quick build at the September 03 fly-in at London-delivery expected > any day. Is it possible to request an N number from the FAA prior to buying > an engine and knowing the engine serial number/make etc? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Pat Lavigne" <pjl53(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: fuel pump-simple=easy
Date: Jan 18, 2004
I fill my firestar using a simple and easy method. I have a two wheel dolly that I made a shelf on at the top measuring roughly 12'x24'. it's held on by large L-brackets to remove when not in use. I put a 5 gal. gas can on it, which is higher than the gas tanks on the plane . then using a syphone pump, I pump gas in the tanks, couldn't be easier . The syphone pump is the kind you use to fill a kerosene heater etc. They cost $3.25 @ Home Depot. Pat Learn how to choose, serve, and enjoy wine at Wine @ MSN. http://wine.msn.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 18, 2004
Subject: Re: MK3 Extra
From: herbgh(at)juno.com
Hi Duncan The one thing that you can get, depending on the state, is a tax bill!! :-) Herb writes: > > > I don't think I needed the engine serial number just to reserve an > n-number. > Check this page - http://av-info.faa.gov/dst/amateur/ I > believe > AC20-27F has the procedure and the address to apply for a custom > n-number. > I reserved my number about a year and a half before I actually > registered > it. I think it was $10 to start and $5/year to keep it reserved. > > Duncan McBride > 319DM > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <loyd.peterson(at)att.net> > To: > Subject: Kolb-List: MK3 Extra > > > > > > Ordered a quick build at the September 03 fly-in at > London-delivery > expected > > any day. Is it possible to request an N number from the FAA prior > to > buying > > an engine and knowing the engine serial number/make etc? > > > = > = > = > = > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Duncan McBride" <duncanmcbride(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: MK3 Extra
Date: Jan 18, 2004
----- Original Message ----- From: <herbgh(at)juno.com> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: MK3 Extra > > Hi Duncan > The one thing that you can get, depending on the state, is a tax bill!! > :-) Herb Not for just reserving the number with the FAA. The state sent me a notice after I actually registered the plane, and I had to pay sales tax on the amount of the first kit. All states want to go after the guys who go across the border to avoid sales tax on their Gulfstream, but Florida at least isn't trying to beat up amateur airplane builders. I called them up and all they wanted was the sales tax on the first kit. They actually have a help desk at Sun'n'Fun to answer questions. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Thacker" <gbthacker(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Sun and Fun
Date: Jan 18, 2004
What are the dates for Sun and Fun Gary Souderton,Pa. Get a FREE online virus check for your PC here, from McAfee. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Elder" <billelder(at)denver.net>
Subject: Hand Pump for Fueling.
Date: Jan 19, 2004
Thanks much for all the inputs. Don't know which to go but I sure have the options now! Safe flying - Bill ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Denny Rowe" <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Sun & Fun Raider info
Date: Jan 19, 2004
Kolbers, I recently received my annual letter from Earl Humble the Chairman of the Sun & Fun Raider unit. For those who don't know who the Raiders are, they are the group of volunteers that handle garbage disposal at S&F. Raiding is the most fun you can have while working your butt off and is a neat way to see the "entire" show while riding on tractor pulled trailers. Between runs you can return to points of interest that you noticed during your pick up runs. Another perk of Raiding is free camping in what I think is the best location on the airport, half way between Paridise City and the main commercial displays, and a short walk from the nicest shower facility on the grounds. Due to our kids now being in school, Linda and I no longer attend but if anyone else is interested I am providing contact info for the Raiders as well as other volunteer groups at S&F. Raiders: Earl Humble 2625 SE 7th Street, Pompano Beach, Florida, 33062-6121 S&F info: 863-644-2431 www.sun-n-fun.org You meet the nicest folks at airshows. Dennis Rowe Mk-3, PA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Lawton" <skyrider2(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Removing Windshield Scratches
Date: Jan 19, 2004
Lar, The sailplane owners at our field use a number of products to polish out scratches on windshields and canopies. One that I remember is a liquid wax made by LP Aeroplastics. Just do a google search to find their website. Also, http://www.wingsandwheels.com/page37.htm carries a number of products for this purpose. I'm not sure that they all work on Lexan, though. Better to check with the respective company. Our on field fiberglass repair specialist has polished out some pretty severe scratches to repair canopies on the gliders. I believe he said he starts out with about 1600 grit sandpaper and goes progressively up to about 2000. Hope that helps. Doug Lawton NE Georgia and Whitwell TN Mathews Field, Sequatchie Valley ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Aileron Deflection
Date: Jan 19, 2004
> When I do "slips" I like to push the stick forward quite a bit, I notice > when the stick is pushed forward that there is not much aileron > deflection. > > What is the purpose of this? > > Bill Vincent Hi Bill/Gang: My guess would be that is a product of the geometry of the control stick. Not the most desireable, but the way things work out sometimes. I don't believe it was designed into the control system for a specific reason. Take care and stay warm in the UP, john h Southern Yooper. :-) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 20, 2004
From: WillUribe(at)aol.com
Subject: I'm ok
Thanks, I was in the oper room for 3hrs. I have no pain, the pain killers work great. Sorry for short messg but I'm using the cell to send emails ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 20, 2004
From: WillUribe(at)aol.com
Subject: I'm ok
Thanks, I was in the oper room for 3hrs. I have no pain, the pain killers work great. Sorry for short messg but I'm using the cell to send emails ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GeoR38(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 20, 2004
Subject: Re: I'm ok
In a message dated 1/20/04 4:04:23 AM Eastern Standard Time, WillUribe(at)aol.com writes: > > Thanks, I was in the oper room for 3hrs. I have no pain, the pain killers > work great. Sorry for short messg but I'm using the cell to send emails > Bless you Will, ...did you notice the difference in light fixtures when you woke up? And how in the world can you use your cell phone for this....you are truly a Great Man. your bud, GeorgeRandolph ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Gherkins Tim-rp3420 <rp3420(at)motorola.com>
Subject: I'm ok
Date: Jan 20, 2004
Will, Good to hear all went well. The pain killers your on? Are they called MEK, or Aerothane, or Polly Brush? Take good care of yourself, look forward to seeing a lean Uribe at monument valley. Your good friends, Tim and Craig -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of WillUribe(at)aol.com Subject: Kolb-List: I'm ok Thanks, I was in the oper room for 3hrs. I have no pain, the pain killers work great. Sorry for short messg but I'm using the cell to send emails ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Johann" <johann(at)gi.is>
Subject: I'm ok
Date: Jan 20, 2004
Hello Will. Great to hear that you are feeling better and this went well. See you at Sun and Fun. Best wishes and speedy recovery. Johann G. Iceland -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of WillUribe(at)aol.com Subject: Kolb-List: I'm ok Thanks, I was in the oper room for 3hrs. I have no pain, the pain killers work great. Sorry for short messg but I'm using the cell to send emails == == == == ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "H MITCHELL" <mitchmnd(at)msn.com>
Subject: Place to stay in Lakeland
Date: Jan 20, 2004
Greetings all, My flying partner and I have stayed at the Brandon Motor Lodge during the last two Sun 'n Fun fly-ins. The rooms are clean, they have cable, pool etc. This is not for royalty but the tab is only $65/night + for geezers. It is about 15 miles of fairly light traffic from the gate. No breakfast but there is at least one of every known franchised eatery and boozatorium near by. I just made my own reservation for 14,15 and 16th. Let's meet at the end of the day at the Kolb trailer and get together for dinner. Duane the plane, Tallahassee, FL, Mk/912, FireFly SN 007. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: What happened to Will?
Date: Jan 20, 2004
> I met Will when he came to visit and see my Firestar2, I missed the first > email from him on this. Can someone tell me what happened to him, All I got was a > 3 hour surgery. It's no big thing I'm only going to loose half my stomach to get at the tumor. People pay big bucks to have this done all the time. Regards, Will Uribe ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb History
Date: Jan 21, 2004
John thanks for the great pic's ,one question thou' did anybody notice the really pretty basket on the bike??? "grin" ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Lawton" <skyrider2(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb-List Digest: 14 Msgs - 01/20/04
Date: Jan 21, 2004
John, Thanks for the history pics. Man, you ARE a pioneer !!! I was flying UL's at the same time, but the longest un-supported xc we ever made was from just north of Atlanta to Chattanooga's Lookout Mountain Flight Park (Hang Gliding) and back over the course of a long Memorial Day Weekend. We had hitched a ride for our hang gliders to the mountain with another HG pilot and we flew our Quicksilvers and a Dactyl up on a Thursday. As I remember, there were 5 or 6 of us. One guy developed carb ice and had to put down on the (as of then) unopened stretch of I-575 somewhere around Canton, GA. It was the first and only time I've ever seen carb ice happen to a two stroke, it only happened to one of the 5 aircraft that were all flying in formation, and was actually sort of a non-event. We all just followed him down and onto the 4 - lane. Let the ice melt and took off again. Shortly thereafter, we picked up I-75 and found a truck stop (your pic in front of the McDonald's reminded me of this) north of Cartersville, that had this neat little 2 lane blacktopped spur extending out into a field adjacent to it's parking lot. A natural UL landing strip. (Looked like maybe they were going to build some kind of an industrial park or something). Anyway, the place was dead, no customers hardly at all. Well, we came buzzing in one after another, taxied up to the pumps, topped off, grabbed snacks, etc. Cars were pulling off the interstate in droves and filling the place up. After about 45 minutes of answering all the questions, the management of the gas station came out and asked us to please come back everyday. They apparently hadn't seen that much business since they opened the joint. ; ) I actually stopped at that truck stop about a month ago, and the little blacktopped spur is completely surrounded by powerlines and buildings now. A shame. We got shut down by high winds about 20 miles short of goal in LaFayette, GA late Thursday evening and had to tie down overnight. Finished up the first part of the trip early the next morning. Took us a total of 6 1/2 hours to fly what we could have driven by car in 2. The Quicks only cruised at around 35 mph. The Dactyl flew circles around us to keep from out running the group. We flew back home on the following Monday. You really had an advantage over us in your Firestar with the higher cruise speed. Of course, we had totally open cockpits with all our gear hanging out in the breeze and single surface wings. ; ( Thanks again for the trip down memory lane, Doug ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GeoR38(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 21, 2004
Subject: Re: Kolb History
In a message dated 1/20/04 11:51:14 PM Eastern Standard Time, jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com writes: > > Spent the first night out of The Flight Farm at Linden, MI. Before I > crawled in my sleeping bag, in an old T hanger, the FBO lady loaned me her > bike so I could ride to town in the morning for coffee and fresh pastries at > a little shop a few miles from the airport. Boy, was that good. I landed > at Linden, MI, again last July on the way to St Ignace, MI, to meet John > Williamson and fly on to Scott Trask's at Iron Mountain, MI, and OSH. I was > going to RON, but the place had drastically changed in the 14 years since I > was last there. No more hangers. All had been bull dozed. The old FBO was > still there, but I doubt it will be there long. Probably already gone. The > price of progress and time. > > http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/airplanes/Linden,%20MI%201989.jpg > Really nifty pictures....you can probably blame my daughter and family who bought a house there, and I visit there and make model airplanes in their basement, for taking up the space of the landing strip....yea, that's progress I guess, but as ol Thomas Wolfe said "you can't go home again". My only question is , who is that young feller in all those pictures? George Randolph Firestar driver...er....kinda.... from The Villages, fl ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Lexan Cleaning and Maintenance
Date: Jan 21, 2004
Morning Gang: Still cool in Alabama. Yesterday it was 22F and this morning it is 24F. Yuck!!! I did a google search a couple days ago on Lexan Cleaning. Came up with NOVUS. http://www.airsource1.com/catalog.cgi/OIL%2CFILTER%2CWASH/POLISH-CLEANERS They have three products: #1-Novus Plastic Clean And Shine #2-Novus Fine Scratch Remover #3-Novus Heavy Scratch Remover Although designed primarily for Plexiglas, which is much harder than Lexan, I found a lot of different pages on the internet where folks are using NOVUS on Lexan on motorcyle windshields, head light covers, instrument covers, etc. Figured I would give them a chance. I ordered the #1 and #2. This company was cheaper than all the others I found that carried NOVUS. During the Firestar days I bought a kit, that is still sold 15 years later, to refurbish my Lexan windshield. Spent a couple days removing, going through the process, only to discover I had a completely fogged windshield. This kit is designed for the harder plexiglass. I could not find any product expressly designed to clean, repair, and maintain Lexan. I still think autombile wax is the best product. After I get the NOVUS I will have a better idea. Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb-List Digest: 14 Msgs - 01/20/04
Date: Jan 21, 2004
And, thank you for yours, Doug. Good reading. Lar. Do not Archive. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Building Kolb Mk III N78LB Vamoose www.gogittum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Lawton" <skyrider2(at)earthlink.net> Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb-List Digest: 14 Msgs - 01/20/04 > > John, > > Thanks for the history pics. Man, you ARE a pioneer !!! I was flying UL's > at the same time, but the longest un-supported xc we ever made was from just > north of Atlanta to Chattanooga's Lookout Mountain Flight Park (Hang > Gliding) and back over the course of a long Memorial Day Weekend. > > We had hitched a ride for our hang gliders to the mountain with another HG > pilot and we flew our Quicksilvers and a Dactyl up on a Thursday. As I > remember, there were 5 or 6 of us. > > One guy developed carb ice and had to put down on the (as of then) unopened > stretch of I-575 somewhere around Canton, GA. It was the first and only > time I've ever seen carb ice happen to a two stroke, it only happened to one > of the 5 aircraft that were all flying in formation, and was actually sort > of a non-event. We all just followed him down and onto the 4 - lane. Let > the ice melt and took off again. > > Shortly thereafter, we picked up I-75 and found a truck stop (your pic in > front of the McDonald's reminded me of this) north of Cartersville, that had > this neat little 2 lane blacktopped spur extending out into a field adjacent > to it's parking lot. A natural UL landing strip. (Looked like maybe they > were going to build some kind of an industrial park or something). Anyway, > the place was dead, no customers hardly at all. Well, we came buzzing in > one after another, taxied up to the pumps, topped off, grabbed snacks, etc. > Cars were pulling off the interstate in droves and filling the place up. > After about 45 minutes of answering all the questions, the management of the > gas station came out and asked us to please come back everyday. They > apparently hadn't seen that much business since they opened the joint. ; > ) > I actually stopped at that truck stop about a month ago, and the little > blacktopped spur is completely surrounded by powerlines and buildings now. > A shame. > > We got shut down by high winds about 20 miles short of goal in LaFayette, GA > late Thursday evening and had to tie down overnight. Finished up the first > part of the trip early the next morning. Took us a total of 6 1/2 hours to > fly what we could have driven by car in 2. The Quicks only cruised at > around 35 mph. The Dactyl flew circles around us to keep from out running > the group. We flew back home on the following Monday. > > You really had an advantage over us in your Firestar with the higher cruise > speed. Of course, we had totally open cockpits with all our gear hanging > out in the breeze and single surface wings. ; > ( > > Thanks again for the trip down memory lane, > > Doug > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Derek Lawrence" <Derek(at)prestwoodpetcrematorium.co.uk>
Subject: mK111 Xtra floor
Date: Jan 21, 2004
Authenticated-Sender: Hi all On the rear floor panel there are two cut outs part way along the rear edge not in line with cross tubes. Can anyone say what they are for? Derek Lawrence Kolb Mk111 Xtra Stourbridge England ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 21, 2004
From: "Bob N." <ronoy(at)shentel.net>
Subject: Re: Lexan Cleaning and Maintenance
My experience in scratch removal has been that you first have to use the really coarse stuff, then use progressively smoother papers, taking several steps. When I first started, I didn't use the coarse grit, and soon found that I wasn't doing any good at all. My finest grit paper is 6000, which makes a baby's butt feel like crocodile skin! And polishing out deep scratches will cause some visual distortion. Bob N. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 21, 2004
Subject: Re: Lexan Cleaning and Maintenance
From: ul15rhb(at)juno.com
John and others, I have used Novus #3, then #2 on my Firestar lexan. I think it removes some scratches and cleans it up, but I also notice very fine circular scratches in bright sunlight or glare conditions. The same is true looking at a deep wax shine on my new motorcycle tank under bright lights at night. It seems even the softest cloth will produce some tiny scratches due to particulates in the air and some that get on the polishing cloth. Novus does not cloud the lexan. Ralph Original Firestar 17 years flying it -- "John Hauck" wrote: Morning Gang: Still cool in Alabama. Yesterday it was 22F and this morning it is 24F. Yuck!!! I did a google search a couple days ago on Lexan Cleaning. Came up with NOVUS. http://www.airsource1.com/catalog.cgi/OIL%2CFILTER%2CWASH/POLISH-CLEANERS They have three products: #1-Novus Plastic Clean And Shine #2-Novus Fine Scratch Remover #3-Novus Heavy Scratch Remover Although designed primarily for Plexiglas, which is much harder than Lexan, I found a lot of different pages on the internet where folks are using NOVUS on Lexan on motorcyle windshields, head light covers, instrument covers, etc. Figured I would give them a chance. I ordered the #1 and #2. This company was cheaper than all the others I found that carried NOVUS. During the Firestar days I bought a kit, that is still sold 15 years later, to refurbish my Lexan windshield. Spent a couple days removing, going through the process, only to discover I had a completely fogged windshield. This kit is designed for the harder plexiglass. I could not find any product expressly designed to clean, repair, and maintain Lexan. I still think autombile wax is the best product. After I get the NOVUS I will have a better idea. Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Lexan Cleaning and Maintenance
Date: Jan 21, 2004
> I have used Novus #3, then #2 on my Firestar lexan. I think it removes some scratches and cleans it up, but I also notice very fine circular scratches in bright sunlight or glare conditions. > Ralph > Original Firestar Ralph/All: Oops! Ralph, you missed a step. Supposed to use Novus #1 as the final step. It is the polish/wax treatment. I think it is supposed to fill in those tiny little teenie weenie circular scratches. My guess is, any good auto wax would do the same thing. I know, after I clean and wax my lexan windshield and door glass, a lot of the scratches and haze are gone. I can live with the big scratches. One can look between them. It is that darn circular haze that turns to dazzling diamonds in the sun that really screws me up. I immediately go IFR in the cockpit. I don't like that when I am in or near airport traffic. Scarey! Take care, john h PS: Ordered the NOVUS Monday and the UPS man dropped it off a short time ago. That is quick for surface UPS from Fort Worth, TX, John Williamson country. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 21, 2004
Subject: Re: Lexan Cleaning and Maintenance
From: ul15rhb(at)juno.com
You are right John, I never used the Novus #1 (cleaner) and maybe that would have made the difference. By the way, the Novus polisher that I used was many years old and lasts a long time. Novus may have a better product now. Ralph -- "John Hauck" wrote: Ralph/All: Oops! Ralph, you missed a step. Supposed to use Novus #1 as the final step. It is the polish/wax treatment. I think it is supposed to fill in those tiny little teenie weenie circular scratches. My guess is, any good auto wax would do the same thing. I know, after I clean and wax my lexan windshield and door glass, a lot of the scratches and haze are gone. I can live with the big scratches. One can look between them. It is that darn circular haze that turns to dazzling diamonds in the sun that really screws me up. I immediately go IFR in the cockpit. I don't like that when I am in or near airport traffic. Scarey! Take care, john h PS: Ordered the NOVUS Monday and the UPS man dropped it off a short time ago. That is quick for surface UPS from Fort Worth, TX, John Williamson country. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Christopher Armstrong" <tophera(at)centurytel.net>
Subject: mK111 Xtra floor
Date: Jan 21, 2004
Possibly brake lines? -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Derek Lawrence Subject: Kolb-List: mK111 Xtra floor Hi all On the rear floor panel there are two cut outs part way along the rear edge not in line with cross tubes. Can anyone say what they are for? Derek Lawrence Kolb Mk111 Xtra Stourbridge England == == == == ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Hauck's Kolb History
Date: Jan 21, 2004
Hi Gang: I'll see if I can post a few more history pics before supper. My Kolb History is unique because it does not necessarily follow chronological order. I made several cross country flights in the Ultrastar, several to Woodville, FL; one to Thomasville, GA. But the real serious cross country work started when I got the Firestar flying in July 1987. By the time Sun and Fun 1988 rolled around, Cuz'n P'fer and I had flown an overnight to Lake City, FL, and Miami, FL. I can not tell you how excited I was when I got within sight of the UL area at Lakeland, S&F 1988. I had finally flown something I built to the big show. I started going to S&F in March 1984, a couple weeks after I sent Homer Kolb a check for $3,495.00 for my Ultrastar kit. So, after four visits to S&F, I was finally flying in. Here is my famous body bag, or more commonly called a one man bivy tent. This was what I lived in on all the overnight flights in the Firestar, including a 21 and 25 day flights. Looks tiny, but enough room to sleep comfortably out of the wind and rain. I even got good enough to dress in this little bittie bugger. That was 17 years ago. Doubt I could do that now. http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/airplanes/Sun%20&%20Fun%201988%20Body%20Bag.jpg This is Homer Kolb and me at S&F 1988. This was the first time Homer had seen my FS. He later flew Cuz'n P'fer and was favorably impressed. Homer Kolb was the only other person to fly my FS. http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/airplanes/Homer%20Kolb%20S&F-1%201988.jpg First morning to fly at S&F 1988. I was up early, got my briefing, and was ready to fly. http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/airplanes/1st%20Flt%201st%20Day%20S&F%201988.jpg My first takeoff at S&F. Normal Firestar T/O, but I got continually counciled about my steep angle of attack. Oh well, the air ops guys that were getting me had never flown a Kolb. http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/airplanes/1st%20TO%201st%20Day%20S&F%201988.jpg This is Ben Dawson chastising me for doing aerobatics within 5 miles of Lakeland Tower. I didn't realize I was doing aerobatics. I went outside the UL traffic pattern practiced some stalls and big wing overs that looked much like barrel rolls. My stalls occurred when the FS stopped flying in a vertical climb. What fun. Homer Kolb liked it, but the S&F guys didn't. I was red flagged, chased down, and grounded for a while until I learned my lesson. My heart was broken. This is when I met Ben Dawson who has been a good friend for all these years. http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/airplanes/1st%20S&F%20Flight%20Reprimand%201988.jpg The Sunday morning after the last day of S&F 1988. That's my old buddy "junk yard" Chuck Shaunesey who has since gone on to that big grass strip in the shy. Chuck always made sure I had a way to get chow, usually had a place for me to sleep. That is not a bad picture, but the thickest fog I have ever encountered. It started at ground level and went up. http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/airplanes/Fog%20S&F%201988.jpg Here's me, Cuz'n P'fer, and our Sun and Fun 1988 Grand Champion Ultralight Award. What more can I say. I was overwhelmed. When I flew to S&F I had no idea what aircraft judging was. Some asked if I was going to have the Firestar judged. Then told me where to go to register for the judging. Man, I did not have a clue. I flew the FS to S&F to fly, and brought back that award. Wow! http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/airplanes/1988%20S&F%20Grand%20Champ%20UL.jpg Better get ready to go to town for supper. I'll continue this as I have time and when I am in the mood to do it. Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net>
Subject: Re: Hauck's Kolb History
Date: Jan 21, 2004
I would really like to " hear,see" your ultrastar just cause I LUVS mine. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com> Subject: Kolb-List: Hauck's Kolb History > > Hi Gang: > > I'll see if I can post a few more history pics before supper. > > My Kolb History is unique because it does not necessarily follow > chronological order. > > I made several cross country flights in the Ultrastar, several to Woodville, > FL; one to Thomasville, GA. But the real serious cross country work started > when I got the Firestar flying in July 1987. By the time Sun and Fun 1988 > rolled around, Cuz'n P'fer and I had flown an overnight to Lake City, FL, > and Miami, FL. > > I can not tell you how excited I was when I got within sight of the UL area > at Lakeland, S&F 1988. I had finally flown something I built to the big > show. I started going to S&F in March 1984, a couple weeks after I sent > Homer Kolb a check for $3,495.00 for my Ultrastar kit. So, after four > visits to S&F, I was finally flying in. Here is my famous body bag, or more > commonly called a one man bivy tent. This was what I lived in on all the > overnight flights in the Firestar, including a 21 and 25 day flights. > Looks tiny, but enough room to sleep comfortably out of the wind and rain. > I even got good enough to dress in this little bittie bugger. That was 17 > years ago. Doubt I could do that now. > > http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/airplanes/Sun%20&%20Fun%201988%20Body%20Bag.jpg > > This is Homer Kolb and me at S&F 1988. This was the first time Homer had > seen my FS. He later flew Cuz'n P'fer and was favorably impressed. Homer > Kolb was the only other person to fly my FS. > > http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/airplanes/Homer%20Kolb%20S&F-1%201988.jpg > > First morning to fly at S&F 1988. I was up early, got my briefing, and was > ready to fly. > > http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/airplanes/1st%20Flt%201st%20Day%20S&F%201988.jpg > > My first takeoff at S&F. Normal Firestar T/O, but I got continually > counciled about my steep angle of attack. Oh well, the air ops guys that > were getting me had never flown a Kolb. > > http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/airplanes/1st%20TO%201st%20Day%20S&F%201988.jpg > > This is Ben Dawson chastising me for doing aerobatics within 5 miles of > Lakeland Tower. I didn't realize I was doing aerobatics. I went outside > the UL traffic pattern practiced some stalls and big wing overs that looked > much like barrel rolls. My stalls occurred when the FS stopped flying in a > vertical climb. What fun. Homer Kolb liked it, but the S&F guys didn't. I > was red flagged, chased down, and grounded for a while until I learned my > lesson. My heart was broken. This is when I met Ben Dawson who has been a > good friend for all these years. > > http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/airplanes/1st%20S&F%20Flight%20Reprimand%201988.jpg > > The Sunday morning after the last day of S&F 1988. That's my old buddy > "junk yard" Chuck Shaunesey who has since gone on to that big grass strip in > the shy. Chuck always made sure I had a way to get chow, usually had a > place for me to sleep. That is not a bad picture, but the thickest fog I > have ever encountered. It started at ground level and went up. > > http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/airplanes/Fog%20S&F%201988.jpg > > Here's me, Cuz'n P'fer, and our Sun and Fun 1988 Grand Champion Ultralight > Award. What more can I say. I was overwhelmed. When I flew to S&F I had > no idea what aircraft judging was. Some asked if I was going to have the > Firestar judged. Then told me where to go to register for the judging. > Man, I did not have a clue. I flew the FS to S&F to fly, and brought back > that award. Wow! > > http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/airplanes/1988%20S&F%20Grand%20Champ%20UL.jpg > > Better get ready to go to town for supper. I'll continue this as I have > time and when I am in the mood to do it. > > Take care, > > john h > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "H MITCHELL" <mitchmnd(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Place to stay in Lakeland
Date: Jan 21, 2004
One of my flying partners advised me to put the phone number on our list. Brandon motor Lodge (813) 689-1261. Honest folks, I am not getting a cut on this!!! Duane the plane ----- Original Message ----- From: H MITCHELL To: kolblist Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 4:44 PM Subject: Place to stay in Lakeland Greetings all, My flying partner and I have stayed at the Brandon Motor Lodge during the last two Sun 'n Fun fly-ins. The rooms are clean, they have cable, pool etc. This is not for royalty but the tab is only $65/night + for geezers. It is about 15 miles of fairly light traffic from the gate. No breakfast but there is at least one of every known franchised eatery and boozatorium near by. I just made my own reservation for 14,15 and 16th. Let's meet at the end of the day at the Kolb trailer and get together for dinner. Duane the plane, Tallahassee, FL, Mk/912, FireFly SN 007. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Duncan McBride" <duncanmcbride(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Hauck's Kolb History
Date: Jan 21, 2004
Thanks, John. This is good stuff. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com> Subject: Kolb-List: Hauck's Kolb History > > Hi Gang: > > I'll see if I can post a few more history pics before supper. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "dama" <dama(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Hauck's Kolb History
Date: Jan 21, 2004
John, your pics with Homer reminded me of last years Sun n Fun where I flew down from ATL and at times wondering what I was getting myself into. I was giving a pax a ride in the pattern (Lou from Atlanta who is bulding a MkIII). While waiting in line to depart for a circuit, Lou taps me on the shoulder and yells over the sound of the idling Rotax, "there's Homer and his wife". Sure enough, there he was in the crowd just like your average Joe. Next thing I knew, his camera came up and he snapped a pic of us. Homer wanted a pic of MY Kolb. In an instant, 900 miles with rain, a head splitting Rotax buzz and an aching back was all worth it. PS, Homer was probably thinking "why did this guy fail to cover his cage"! Kip http://www.springeraviation.net/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Linda Rowe" <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb-List Digest: 14 Msgs - 01/20/04
Date: Jan 21, 2004
Doug wrote: The Dactyl flew circles around us to keep from out running > the group. Doug, Great story, it brought back memeries of flying my Dactyl to a Pig roast in Saxonburg PA in 1981 or 82 along with a friend in a Kawasaki 440 powered Wizard .(GASP) The Wizard flew so slow that I also had to fly circles around him as the Dac wouldn't hold altitude at his slow speed. We had a great time that day, what a wonderful experience for myself being all of 15 or 16 years old at the time. Dennis Rowe, Mk-3, PA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Judy or Larry Gitt" <gittj(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: 503 two seater
Date: Jan 22, 2004
I was in Omaha to a car show and got to talking to an old timer like me , And of course Airplanes came into the conversation . He wanted to know what kind of plane I was flying and I told him a Kolb Kolbra . He didn't know anything about the kolbra but knew of Kolb and then he was telling me a story of a guy that went to Alaska with a 503 in a two seater and then from there all the way to the Kolb company back east and he was telling me , it grossed out with the fuel tank at 1200 lbs . He was really impressed with that plane . But never built one . This sounds a little heavy for a Mk II. What's the story on this guy. Does anybody know? Had to some time back . Was that you John H ? Larry G ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Aaron Hollingsworth" <aaron(at)gamespeak.com>
Subject: tail wire tension
Date: Jan 22, 2004
How tight should the flying wires on the fail feathers be? Mine seem a tad bit loose to me. Aaron Mk3 -- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 22, 2004
Subject: Re: tail wire tension
From: ul15rhb(at)juno.com
writes: > > > How tight should the flying wires on the fail feathers be? Mine seem > a tad bit loose to me. > > Aaron > Mk3 Aaron, Mine were loose for many years because I didn't want to use any tools to tighten the wing nut during setup. After about 400 hours, the thimbles were getting gouged by the wing tangs. When looking back at the tail during flight, the stabs were bouncing all over the place. I replaced them and now use a nut/wrench and they are comfortably tight but not too tight. Ralph Original Firestar 17 years flying it ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 22, 2004
From: "Gary r. voigt" <johndeereantique(at)qwest.net>
Subject: Re: tail wire tension
Aaron, i fly a kolb kxp model and mine are pretty tight... no way of telling for sure without putting a deflection gauge on it but i wanted this way because once in the air, forces play a big part on this...if you think yours are loose then they will be more so once the air moves over the elevator etc. to fix this you can get adjustable tangs or use washers inside/outside of the tang depending if you want to tighten or give it slack. hope this helps. Gary r. voigt Excelsior,mn. still flying on wheels off the ice! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aaron Hollingsworth" <aaron(at)gamespeak.com> Subject: Kolb-List: tail wire tension > > How tight should the flying wires on the fail feathers be? Mine seem a tad bit loose to me. > > Aaron > Mk3 > > -- > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 22, 2004
Subject: [ Jim Gerken ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Jim Gerken Subject: Kolb Twinstar MkIII http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/gerken@us.ibm.com.01.22.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 22, 2004
Subject: [ Dennis A Rowe ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Dennis A Rowe Subject: N616DR http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/rowedl@highstream.net.01.22.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 22, 2004
Subject: [ Gary R. Voigt ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Gary R. Voigt Subject: Lake Minnetonka Winter Flying http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/johndeereantique@qwest.net.01.22.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 22, 2004
Subject: [ Paul Petty ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Paul Petty <ppetty@c-gate.net> Subject: Cute http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/ppetty@c-gate.net.01.22.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Christopher Armstrong" <tophera(at)centurytel.net>
Subject: bmw power
Date: Jan 23, 2004
Since the cam shaft and pushrods are on the bottom of the bmw what is in that big bump on top of the crank case? Could you cut some of that away and save a few pounds? I can't think of what would be in there. Topher ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kirk Smith" <snuffy(at)usol.com>
Subject: Re: 503 two seater
Date: Jan 23, 2004
Most likely was Rick Trader. He was carrying near 1000 lbs. if my memory serves me right. The gross rating on his plane was only 750 lbs. Kitplane magazine archives should say. Reading of his adventure was what made me decide on the Kolb. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [ Jim Gerken ] :
Date: Jan 23, 2004
Hi Jim G/All: I like the BMW set up. How can you get more horses out of it? What is the engine rated for now? HP/Torque/Red Line? Are the silencers straight through? I bet the BMW would not be that noisy with straight pipes cut the proper length. John Williamson's Jabiru was running straight exhaust without being overly annoying. I liked the way it sounded. Realistically, the 582 burns 5 to 5.5 gph at 5800 to 6000 rpm. Just guessing, but the BMW will probably burn about 3 gph putting out equivalent power. I know nothing about BMW engines, other than their great reputation for reliability. I bet one could squeeze a lot more than 66 hp out of one and still keep it on the realiable side of the equation. Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [ Dennis A Rowe ] Tailwheel
Date: Jan 23, 2004
Denny/All: Another way to get the nose up and tail down a little, is cut the tail wheel strut so about 6 inches of strut is exposed between the tail post and the tail wheel sockets. Homer always designed the struts extra long, for some reason. The extra long tail wheel strut is prone to get into the bottom of the rudder if one experiences a hard landing on the tail wheel. It also allows the tail wheel to move around a lot in all directions. Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Judy or Larry Gitt" <gittj(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: MkII 1200 lb gross Rick Trader
Date: Jan 23, 2004
How much fuel did this MKII have on board ?, You think the landing gear would be in trouble ;;;;;;;; Plus , Just what is the gross on a MkII ?. Any how ,it amazing what some of these guys do .I guess it shows you how strong kolb's are build . ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kirby Dennis Contr ASC/TM <Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland.af.mil>
Subject: Re: Hauck's Kolb History
Date: Jan 23, 2004
John - Thanks for sharing your early barnstorming stories & bare-bones cross-country adventures. These are the kinds of tales that newbie Kolb fliers (like me) need to hear to get us out and start having fun with our airplanes! I'm still barely only halfway through my 40-hour Phase-1 flight testing. Though I'm already quite comfortable with the flight and landing characteristics of my Mark-III (thanks to all who offered landing tips by the way - I haven't bent a gear leg since my first botched landing!), I have not yet flown to another airport and actually shut down my engine. Being that this is my first homebuilt aircraft, I have not yet managed to sever those psychological apron strings that keep me tied to the comfort & security of being within 25 miles of my home airport. That is why I'll be trailering my plane to Monument Valley in May, rather than flying it there. (Thanks for not smirking at me for that, John!) Keep the stories coming ... Dennis Kirby N93DK, Verner-1400, Powerfin72 in Cedar Crest, NM ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne Cahoon @ Aircraft Engravers" <wayne(at)engravers.net>
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Subject: Fuel Cap Engraving, Labeling, Indentifying
Date: Jan 23, 2004
Have your Fuel Caps engraved, it's permanent and easy to read. Aircraft Engravers has been engraving fuel caps for over 14 years. You can see our web page at http://engravers.net/aircraft/fuel_caps.htm Other types of engraving jobs can be viewed at http://engravers.net/main/ac_products.htm There are a few sets of loaner fuel caps for the more common styles if your tanks are wet. FREE shipping by USPS Priority mail for all fuel cap engraving orders in the month of February. Wayne Cahoon Aircraft Engravers (860) 653-2780 (860) 653-7324 Fax http://engravers.net/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 23, 2004
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Old Kolb tape
Got the tape today, actually, just a bit ago. Haven't seen it yet, me & the Good Lookin' Old Poop are about to leave & go square dancing, but will look at it later tonight! Thanks Richard Pike ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "bryan green" <lgreen1(at)sc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Old Kolb tape
Date: Jan 23, 2004
list I got the old tape and it is great enjoyed it very much. Do not archive. Bryan Green Elgin SC Firestar I 19LBG 377 BRS ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Pike" <rwpike(at)charter.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Old Kolb tape > > Got the tape today, actually, just a bit ago. Haven't seen it yet, me & the > Good Lookin' Old Poop are about to leave & go square dancing, but will look > at it later tonight! > Thanks > Richard Pike > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: FireStar II questions
Date: Jan 23, 2004
Greetings men....I have a couple of questions that have been working on my feeble mind. Need some expierienced answers. How fast will a FireStar II,,..loaded pretty well towards gross...fly with a 503?..... How fast is the economical cruise? (for best range) What is the fuel consumption rate? (at econ cruise) Does a 582 equipped FSII get any better range with the same fuel capacity...say 10 gallons? Does anybody on this list have or had a 690L powered FSII?...and same questions for it... Need some real world numbers here.....Thx in advance. Don Gherardini FireFly 098 http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "James and Cathy Tripp" <jtripp(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: FireStar II questions
Date: Jan 23, 2004
Don, Can't answer most of your questions because I'm still building my FSII but I would think a 582 on a FS is a bit too much engine (weight and HP). Just my opinion though. James Tripp FSII, Wings and Tail surfaces painted. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net> Subject: Kolb-List: FireStar II questions > > Greetings men....I have a couple of questions that have been working on my > feeble mind. Need some expierienced answers. > > How fast will a FireStar II,,..loaded pretty well towards gross...fly with a > 503?..... > > How fast is the economical cruise? (for best range) > > What is the fuel consumption rate? (at econ cruise) > > Does a 582 equipped FSII get any better range with the same fuel > capacity...say 10 gallons? > > Does anybody on this list have or had a 690L powered FSII?...and same > questions for it... > > Need some real world numbers here.....Thx in advance. > > > Don Gherardini > FireFly 098 > http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Linda Rowe" <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Re: FireStar II questions
Date: Jan 23, 2004
> > Greetings men....I have a couple of questions that have been working on my > feeble mind. Need some expierienced answers. > > How fast will a FireStar II,,..loaded pretty well towards gross...fly with a > 503?..... > > How fast is the economical cruise? (for best range) > > What is the fuel consumption rate? (at econ cruise) > > Does a 582 equipped FSII get any better range with the same fuel > capacity...say 10 gallons? > > Does anybody on this list have or had a 690L powered FSII?...and same > questions for it... > > Need some real world numbers here.....Thx in advance. > > Don Gherardini > FireFly 098 > http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm > Don, I don't think the weight of a 582 or 690L would be a problem for a FS II, but the power probably would. Neither engine weigh very much more than a 503 with a C gearbox, but the power increase of 20hp is a huge leap. I know a lot of folks have installed 582s on Mk-2s which I am pretty sure have the same wing as a FS II but Homer always warned against such installations as frame cracking becomes a concern. All that said, I know from flying 503, 582 and 690L powered ships that the 690L would definitly burn the least fuel of the bunch on a FS II size ship. It really is surprisingly easy on fuel for a big 2 stroke with Bing carbs. also the cruise power settings you would use with a 690 powered FS would be extreamly low, no doubt that VNE could be exceeded in level flight with such a set up. One would need to be very careful with throttle control. 503 powered Firestars seem to haul the mail nicely, I'll look foreward to hearing performance numbers from 503 powered FS drivers.Will Uribe, how are you feeling pal? :-) Denny Rowe, 690L powerewd Mk-3, PA, PS: 16 degrees out and we are heading to DQ drive through for ice cream. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 23, 2004
From: Terry <tkrolfe(at)usadatanet.net>
Subject: Thanks for the pics!
John H., Thanks for the trip down memory lane!!!! Being a relative newby to the Kolb world, I find this all very interesting and I look at you early pictures with envy. Wish I could have been involved much earlier. I have had the pleasure of Homer's company and he is the best of gentlemen!! You had the rare privilege of working closely with him and got to know him in a way few have. Wish I had been there! Glad to be part of the Kolb family now and look forward to more encounters with the rest of you in the days ahead. I really enjoyed the time spent with John H. & John W. at Oshkosh and again at New London, KY and also with the others there, Paul, Richard, Bryan, Steve and many more. Wouldn't that be something to have a fly-in at Homer's farm!!!! Wow! I have flown in there once to show him my FireFly, but would caution that advanced approval would be correct and necessary. Wouldn't that be a blast to stage a fly-in at the place where it all began for us Kolber's!! I think it could be arranged with the proper contact and handling. How about you John? Could you help make it happen?!!!!! As a second choice for a Northeast Fly-in, I second Dennis R. idea of Wellsville, Pa. which is the Footlight Ranch airstrip which has three UL fly-in's each year. I know a many UL's make it to this each year. Many Kolber's here in central Pa. Anyway, again thanks for sharing the early years, Terry - FireFly #95 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Clay Stuart" <tcstuart(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: aluminum tanks
Date: Jan 24, 2004
To the fellows with custom aluminum tanks, John Williamson and Uncle Craig, among others. What are you doing to the exterior of the tanks? Painting, anodizing? Is there a need to do anything? I know that Steven Green painted his tank. Clay Stuart building Mark IIIXtra Danville KY ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 24, 2004
From: "johnjung(at)compusenior.com" <johnjung(at)compusenior.com>
Subject: Re: FireStar II questions
Answers for Don's questions: How fast will a FireStar II,,..loaded pretty well towards gross...fly with a 503?..... 80 mph at 725# gross, WOT How fast is the economical cruise? (for best range) 45 mph at 2.25 gph gives 20 mpg or up to 190 miles on 10 gallons What is the fuel consumption rate? (at econ cruise) 5.5 gph at 75 mph is fast cruise 3.5 gph at 58 mph is quiet cruise John Jung Firestar II N6163J Surprise, AZ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: aluminum tanks
Date: Jan 24, 2004
> What are you doing to the exterior of the tanks? Painting, anodizing? > Is there a need to do anything? I know that Steven Green painted his tank. > Clay Stuart Hi Clay/All: If it is hidden, I would not to anything to it on the outside. If it is exposed to prying eyes, I still would not paint it if it was finished up and welded professionally. I shot my 5052 aluminum tank with Stitts, now Polyfiber, epoxy primer 13 years ago. It is hidden. If I had it to do again, I would not. I have two auxilery fuel tanks in the back of my pickup made of 5052. They have been exposed to the elements since 1996, 8 years. Show no corrosion. Today I would save the paint and the weight. On the inside, unless it was a factory 5052 aluminum tank, I would slosh with Randolph combination auto/avgas slosh and seal. john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jo and Larry" <joandlp(at)starband.net>
Subject: New GPS ?
Date: Jan 24, 2004
I am sure I saw a new handheld GPS in an aviation magazine that was setup similar to an EFIS ( altitude and speed on left and right tapes, heading on top, etc). I can't find the magazine or any other information; thought it was cool at the time and was going to go back and look at it. Anyone know what I am talking about or was it a 'bad trip' Thanks, Larry "Aviation is not inherently dangerous, but... ." ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Airgriff2(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 24, 2004
Subject: Re: MkII 1200 lb gross Rick Trader
I,m not sure what the published gross wt. was on the MK2, but I remember reading articles on Rick Trader's flight to Alaska and I also have the video that he had made and it was mentioned that the flight was made at 140% gross wt. Bob Griffin ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: New GPS ?
Date: Jan 24, 2004
Larry/All: That is a Garmin 196. I bought one last year. Great system to fly with. It does have the page you are talking about, looks like an instrument panel. Do a google search for "Garmin+196" to get info on this system. john h > I am sure I saw a new handheld GPS in an aviation magazine that was setup > similar to an EFIS ( altitude and speed on left and right tapes, heading on > top, etc). > Larry ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Airgriff2(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 24, 2004
Subject: Re: NE Kolb Homecoming
A fly-in to Homer's place sounds fantastic!! The only problem I see is a time fitting it in a busy summer already of flying for alot of Kolb pilots. April- S&F, MV-May, Alaska flight in mid summer, Aug- Oshkash, London- Sept. 4th of July sounds nice but it would be guys like John H., and John W, and several others who would be willing to fly across the country to invade Homers farm, wouldn't be able to make it. Is there a way to schedual as to make it possible for most to attend that would want to ? If Homers couldnt work out, I was thinking of Cooperstown NY as a back-up choice also. A great fellow purchased the field 4 yrs. ago and sunk $750,000.00 into it. 3000' grass strip on the west side of the Catskill Mts., a resturant , new hangars, fuel, and plenty of camping room, with bath & showers. Cooperstown is known for the "baseball hall of fame", a small country town with a beautiful lake. First choice would be to see about 20 Kolbs drop out of the sky onto Homers farm. The practice of Kolbs being used so much as cross country flying machines now days is making it difficult to schedual a time and place for them all to meet at once. Isn't that something!! Fly Safe Bob Griffin ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jo and Larry" <joandlp(at)starband.net>
Subject: New GPS?
Date: Jan 24, 2004
Thanks John but it's not the 196 I saw. This one had the map in the center, with flight information on the sides and top. Similar to the Chelton system. I thought it was the new Lowrance 1000 but their web site does not contain a picture of that page setup. I will keep looking in my mags if the wife did not throw it away. You are right, the 196 is a great machine, I especially like the runway extension. I was drawn to the Lowrance because of the obstruction database. Larry "Aviation is not inherently dangerous, but... ." ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Judy or Larry Gitt" <gittj(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: To all the past stores
Date: Jan 24, 2004
Weather it John H or Rick, John W anybody else you got to enjoy the adventures of reading these stores of the past . and there travels and seeing some real engineering in the building go on . thanks guys I love it for what it worth Larry G ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MEMATUZAK(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 24, 2004
Subject: Re: FireStar II questions
FSII data flying speeds 45-65 comfortable 70 is pushing it for me fuel consump. 2.5 gal./hr. on average. At 50-55 mph and 4500rpm just sight seeing 2 GPH. 2 hours of flying and I can see where I'm going to land. This is a FSII 503 sc 5 gal of fuel 190 lb pilot. Too much fun:) mike matuszczak palm coast FL ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb "Builders Site"
Date: Jan 25, 2004
> Linda at Kolb wrote me and told me my new web site ( building my Firestar II ) is going to be put on the Kolb web page , in their "Builders Sites..... Gotta Fly... > Mike in MN Hi Mike/All: That is cool! john h DO NOT ARCIVE ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 25, 2004
From: possums <possums(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Rick Trader
I met Rick Trader at Sun & Fun - I think it was a year before he left on his trip; it might have been two years before. He was talking to us (The Possums from Hell) about what he wanted to do. We thougt we were "bad asses" back then. He seemed like a nice guy - but really didn't know a lot about utralights or engines. We tried to explain to him abut how the engines were really not that really reliable. How what he was talking about was not something that was really feasible. How it was hard enough to just get to Sun & Fun & Back from "Atlanta". Heck back in the late 80's and early 90's you were doing something if you just got there. But he didn't listen - and see where it got him. I also got to see his plane when he got back with all the signatures on it. He kind of used it up on that adventure. But it was worth it. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: trailer of shame
From: Erich_Weaver(at)URSCorp.com
01/26/2004 12":01:15.AM(at)matronics.com, MIME-CD complete at 01/26/2004 12:01:15.AM(at)matronics.com, Serialize by Router on SMTP102/URSCorp(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 01/25/2004 11:59:06.PM(at)matronics.com
Date: Jan 26, 2004
Dennis et al: There is no shame in trailering to Monument Valley, my friend! The shame would be to miss it completely. Also makes things a bit more convenient to have a vehicle around instead of being tied to the plane.I am always amazed by the long trips done by our two Johns, but for me, its unlikely I will ever attempt a real cross-the-country trip unless I start flying something a bit faster than a Kolb. I can relate to those feelings of uncertainty about venturing out beyond your comfort zone. No need to over do it - go a little at a time, and pick your days. What really helps my condfidence is to venture out with a flying buddy in a plane that is reasonably matched with my own own. A few words over the radio from a friendly voice can be very comforting at times, especially if your buddy has done the route before! And its nice to know that if you were to go down, there will be someone who knows exactly where you are (make sure you know how to quickly mark a waypoint on the GPS in-flight, so you can always back track to find your buddy or at least tell the recue crew exactly where to go!). Two years ago, Boyd and I met up in Beaver Utah with a few other folks and started on the way to MV. I was so scared I didnt sleep the night before. I remember often finding myself as the lead plane, which was startling given that I had never seen any of this country before, I was pretty much totally depending on the GPS for navigation, and I couldnt see anybody else because they were following behind me (Why are they following ME???). I later joked to Boyd that I felt like the guy in the cell phone commercial, saying "Can you hear me now? Can you hear me now?" over and over, just so I could hear someone's voice and reassure myself I was not alone. The group disintegrated before we got to MV, but I did gain valuable experience and confidence. It also resulted in me mentioning a possible return trip to MV on the List sometime later, which ended up being last years trip - so much fun that we are all gonna do it over again. Anyway,I still prefer to trailer the longer distances - especially when Im on my own. See ya on the road pardner. Erich Weaver ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: Flight Farm 1989
Date: Jan 25, 2004
John, I have always admired Howlands designs.The tig welded square tube alum fuselage interests me alot.,,, not to mention they are all so attractive. I tried to buy an H-1 pegasus with a 503 in fla once...went very cheap...and I was an hour late...man...I brooded over missing that one for awhile! That H-2 in your pics is a real beauty! Don Gherardini FireFly 098 http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: bmw, what's on top?
From: Jim Gerken <gerken(at)us.ibm.com>
Date: Jan 26, 2004
01/26/2004 07:31:26 AM >From: "Christopher Armstrong" <tophera(at)centurytel.net> >Subject: Kolb-List: bmw power >Since the cam shaft and pushrods are on the bottom of the bmw what is in >that big bump on top of the crank case? Could you cut some of that away >and save a few pounds? I can't think of what would be in there. >Topher Starter. There's a cover over it, and that could be removed, wouldnt need it at all really. In fron of that theres a engine case section that also provides mounting for the rectifier, which coul be moved so the case section and cover could be cut down. Both these mods could provide maybe 4 pounds reduction if redone in fiberglass and foam. There would be maybe 50 hours in the job. Won't be this year, that much is certain. Good input Topher. Jim Gerken ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: trailer of shame
Date: Jan 26, 2004
> There is no shame in trailering to Monument Valley, my friend! The shame > would be to miss it completely. Also makes things a bit more convenient to > have a vehicle around instead of being tied to the plane. > Erich Weaver Erich/All: I agree with what you say. Last year worked out great. We had the right mix of people who flew and trailered in. Jim Hefren's trailer became his and Boyd Young's home, plus a good place to gather during the day. A lot of us slept in Jim's yard and saved a dollar or two on camping fees. :-) Having ground transportation made getting the gear from the airplane to the campground, fueling, and eating, a lot more convenient. I did enjoy walking up and down the hill, looking at those gigantic red rocks and cliffs. However, there were other times I was more interested in that good coffee and breakfast at the resturant than the red dirt and rocks. One of the best things about our sport is freedom of choice. We pretty much can do what we want to do with our airplanes, during building as well as flying them. Satisfying our desires, the excitement and fun of building and flying, meeting and spending time with others with similar interests, that's what it is all about. I feel lucky to be part of this Kolb Family, spread world wide. Special folks! john h ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: John H: BMW questions/comments
From: Jim Gerken <gerken(at)us.ibm.com>
Date: Jan 26, 2004
01/26/2004 08:10:30 AM >Hi Jim G/All: >I like the BMW set up. >How can you get more horses out of it? >What is the engine rated for now? HP/Torque/Red Line? >Are the silencers straight through? I bet the BMW would not be that noisy >with straight pipes cut the proper length. John Williamson's Jabiru was >running straight exhaust without being overly annoying. I liked the way it >sounded. >Realistically, the 582 burns 5 to 5.5 gph at 5800 to 6000 rpm. Just >guessing, but the BMW will probably burn about 3 gph putting out equivalent >power. I know nothing about BMW engines, other than their great reputation >for reliability. I bet one could squeeze a lot more than 66 hp out of one >and still keep it on the realiable side of the equation. >Take care, >john h On the bike, they claim 60 Hp. Redline intermittant is set at 7250, continuous is 7000. The silencers I am using are glass packs, with one perforated obstruction halfway through. The noise so far is a bit louder than the 582, with the noise spectrum biased toward louder at lwer frequencies, and less high-pitched noise than the 582. This works out well since the ANR headsets work better at lower frequencies. Straight pipes were so freeking loud it was like a drag car. No way I could tolerate it, let alone the neighbor factor. Mods to get more power include cam, bigger valve heads, higher compression. I've seen one turbocharged. Yes, there is more available power without compromising too much reliability. Jim Gerken ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <billie.kennedy(at)cox.net>
Subject: 1985 Firestar
Date: Jan 26, 2004
Does anyone have a flight manual for the subject Firestar? I just purchased this Firestar with a Rotax 447. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HShack(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 26, 2004
Subject: Re: Flight Farm 1989
In a message dated 1/26/2004 12:16:30 AM Eastern Standard Time, donghe@one-eleven.net writes: I have always admired Howlands designs.The tig welded square tube alum fuselage interests me alot.,,, not to mention they are all so attractive. I tried to buy an H-1 pegasus with a 503 in fla once...went very cheap...and I was an hour late...man...I brooded over missing that one for awhile! There is a Pegasus w/447 beautifully built by an A & P in SC for sale. Howard Shackleford FS II SC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GeoR38(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 26, 2004
Subject: Re: trailer of shame
In a message dated 1/26/04 12:02:34 AM Eastern Standard Time, Erich_Weaver(at)URSCorp.com writes: > It also resulted in me mentioning a possible return trip to MV > on the List sometime later, which ended up being last years trip - so much > fun that we are all gonna do it over again. > > Anyway,I still prefer to trailer the longer distances - especially when Im > on my own. See ya on the road pardner. > > > Erich Weaver > > Great story Erich!! George Randolph sounds about like what I would write as a non X countryer ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dale Sellers" <dsel1(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: The effect of speed reduction on power
Date: Jan 26, 2004
I have a question for you thinkers. I am too old to concentrate this hard. It makes my brain hurt, even though I am a retired math teacher, it's been a long time since my Physics classes. It seems that I remember something about power increase being directly proportional to speed decrease, not taking into consideration inefficencies of things like bearing friction, belt slippage or chain/gear friction. That said, I know that if you reduce the speed of an engine at a given RPM through the use of some sort of a reduction drive, the power delivered to the out put is increased. That's why my 1957 Ford tractor with a 34 hp engine, has more than enough power to pull two row implements. BUT, if the decrease in speed is directionly portional to the power gain, that would mean that my 35 hp Cuyuna on my Ultra Star with a 2.56:1 reduction drive, would be delivering 2.56 X 35 hp or it would be delivering 89.6 hp to the output shaft and I don't think it's doing that. What's wrong with this picture? Dale Sellers Georgia Ultra Star ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "boyd young" <by0ung(at)brigham.net>
"Kolb-List Digest Server"
Subject: fuel tanks
Date: Jan 26, 2004
To the fellows with custom aluminum tanks, John Williamson and Uncle Craig, among others. What are you doing to the exterior of the tanks? Painting, anodizing? Is there a need to do anything? I know that Steven Green painted his tank. Clay Stuart ------------------------------------- i polished mine and put automobile wax on it. boyd ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Re: The effect of speed reduction on power
Date: Jan 26, 2004
I believe it multiplies the torque, not the horsepower. Lar. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Building Kolb Mk III N78LB Vamoose www.gogittum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dale Sellers" <dsel1(at)bellsouth.net> Subject: Kolb-List: The effect of speed reduction on power BUT, if the decrease in speed is directionly portional to the power gain, that would mean that my 35 hp Cuyuna on my Ultra Star with a 2.56:1 reduction drive, would be delivering 2.56 X 35 hp or it would be delivering 89.6 hp to the output shaft and I don't think it's doing that. > > What's wrong with this picture? > > Dale Sellers > Georgia Ultra Star > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: The effect of speed reduction on power
Date: Jan 26, 2004
Dale....its a hard concept to understand sometimes.....when I am teaching our engine service schools....I attempt to describe it this way.. We measure torque with an insturment....and we caculate horsepower with a caculator., and not all manufacturers of engines use the generally accepted "Watts" formula for caculating Hp anymore. So when you us the term "Power"...it is important to keep this concept in mind. now...to address your question....lets forget horsepower...because we increase torque with a reduction drive....the same as we increase the torque to the wheels of our auto with a transmission....we never think of increasing the horsepower of our car with a transmission. so when you are caculating the HORSEPOWER gained by a reduction unit....technically you loose some...NEVER gain.. In your horsepower caculation..you need to adjust the horsepower caculation of the reduced output shaft by the rpm reduction numbers....(time factors in you hp formula) A Horsepower rating basically is a torque rating converted to a time factor....and thats where the rpm number effects the formula. All in all...its a lousy way to rate an engine really! But...Marketing has seized the horsepower numbers and put all the effort behind it use. Today..it is very difficult to compare engines with Horsepower ratings as which is more "powerful" than the other...which is just how some marketing people want it! Don Gherardini Sales / Engineering dept. American Honda Engines Power Equipment Company CortLand, Illinois 800-626-7326 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Judy or Larry Gitt" <gittj(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: What happen to rich
Date: Dec 31, 2003
Possums, What happen to Rick is he still alive and still flying ? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Gherkins Tim-rp3420 <rp3420(at)motorola.com>
Subject: aluminum tanks
Date: Jan 26, 2004
Clay, Uncle Craig did nothing to the outside or inside of his aluminum tank. The welds are works of art, done by a local guy here who does a lot of custom work as well as work on indy cars. After the tank was welded up, we air pressurized it for 4 days and it never lost air pressure over that time. So no sloshing the inside of the tank was necessary. If we were to do it over again, I would suggest some sort of anodizing, because after time the tank will start to dull with oxidation. Nephew Tim Gherkins Firestar II in painting stage. -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Clay Stuart Subject: Kolb-List: aluminum tanks To the fellows with custom aluminum tanks, John Williamson and Uncle Craig, among others. What are you doing to the exterior of the tanks? Painting, anodizing? Is there a need to do anything? I know that Steven Green painted his tank. Clay Stuart building Mark IIIXtra Danville KY ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: The effect of speed reduction on power
Date: Jan 26, 2004
Dale....I re-read you post...and here you being a math teacher....I should have said it like this maybe... Horsepower stays the same..minus additional frictional losses of reduction unit.(just as you suggest)...torque is multiplied by your formula correctly...so instead of using 35 hp x 2.56....use torque x 2.56.. then...when you have the new torque number....run the watts formula backwards to find the "new "hp number...which...by the reduced rpm...will be back around 35... hp= torque x rpm divided by 5252 Don Gherardini Sales / Engineering dept. American Honda Engines Power Equipment Company CortLand, Illinois 800-626-7326 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Original Firestar Instrument Panel
Date: Jan 26, 2004
Hi Gang: Actually, this picture is on my updated instrument panel. The one that was pulled back towards the pilot so he could do normal pilot things, like, see it. :-) I took this shot somewhere north of Marshall, Texas, climbing over the mountains towards Muscogee, OK, and the Hat Box Flyin 1989. Got everything I need right there on the little panel: Slip/Skid Indicator Mag Compass Digital Tach (Ticking along at 5,800 rpm, normal cruise for the 447. I had started pulling Cuz'n P'fer's nose up to get over those mountains in the foreground and he's still indicating 67 MPH. The note on the back of the pic indicates I need 3,500 feet to clear the mountains. I'm working on it.) Cyl Head Temp G Meter Altimeter ASI EGT http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/Hat%20Box%20Flyin%201989/Firestar%20Instr%20Panel.jpg The G Meter should have kept me honest, but it takes more than high readings on an instrument to get a "fool's" attention. Normal aerobatics pulled 3 to 3.5 g's. Intentionally, I could not get the airplane to pull more than 5 g's. The most I encountered in turbulence was 3 g's. That is as in, "I was flying along and BAM!!! I hit a bump in the road." That was probably wind shear, which, BTW, hurt my neck when it happened. The lighter the load, the more violent the reaction to the wind. I was on my way to Sun and Fun 1989, with an RON at Woodville, FL. I'll have to look in my log book, but I believe it took me a tad over two hours to fly from Gantt IAP, AL, to Woodville, FL, about 250 miles, with a cruise speed of about 70 mph. When I got to the cow pasture at Woodville, which was surround by planted pines on 3 sides, I had the worst time in my aviation career getting the Firestar on the ground in one piece. I made 5 or 6 approaches before it was over. Bro Jim was just a grinning at me when I was trying to fly that little bucking bronco. Twern't funny a bit to me. Was one wild ass ride. Guaranteed to pump adrenalin. Those were the good old days! john h PS: Little did I know, one could eventually wear one of these little airplanes out, especially when flown well beyond what it was originally designed for. :-( ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GeoR38(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 26, 2004
Subject: Re: The effect of speed reduction on power
In a message dated 1/26/04 10:56:08 AM Eastern Standard Time, dsel1(at)bellsouth.net writes: > > It seems that I remember something about power increase being directly > proportional to speed decrease, not taking into consideration inefficencies of > things like bearing friction, belt slippage or chain/gear friction. > That said, I know that if you reduce the speed of an engine at a given RPM > through the use of some sort of a reduction drive, the power delivered to the > out put is increased. > Torque, which is a force, not power which includes time and force. George Randolph ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 26, 2004
From: Jack & Louise Hart <jbhart(at)ldd.net>
Subject: Re: The effect of speed reduction on power
> Dale, There is a good explanation of horsepower and torque at: http://www.4x4abc.com/jeep101/torque.html Jack B. Hart FF004 Jackson, MO Jack & Louise Hart jbhart(at)ldd.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jimmy @ Jo Ann Hill" <hillstw(at)jhill.biz>
Subject: Re: The effect of speed reduction on power
Date: Jan 26, 2004
What's wrong is: power is equal to force times distance, divided by units of time. ie, one horsepower is defined as 550 foot-pounds per second. When you hold power input equal, and reduce either force, or distance in a given unit of time, then the other parameter goes up. (more force, less distance, or more distance, less force) Another way to think of it is this: your tractor may be able to pull a one bottom plow at, say, 5 miles per hour, but may only be able to pull a two bottom plow at 2.5 miles per hour. Regards. Jimmy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dale Sellers" <dsel1(at)bellsouth.net> Subject: Kolb-List: The effect of speed reduction on power > > I have a question for you thinkers. I am too old to concentrate this hard. It makes my brain hurt, even though I am a retired math teacher, > it's been a long time since my Physics classes. > > It seems that I remember something about power increase being directly proportional to speed decrease, not taking into consideration inefficencies of things like bearing friction, belt slippage or chain/gear friction. > That said, I know that if you reduce the speed of an engine at a given RPM through the use of some sort of a reduction drive, the power delivered to the out put is increased. > > That's why my 1957 Ford tractor with a 34 hp engine, has more than enough power to pull two row implements. > BUT, if the decrease in speed is directionly portional to the power gain, that would mean that my 35 hp Cuyuna on my Ultra Star with a 2.56:1 reduction drive, would be delivering 2.56 X 35 hp or it would be delivering 89.6 hp to the output shaft and I don't think it's doing that. > > What's wrong with this picture? > > Dale Sellers > Georgia Ultra Star > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: Flight Farm 1989
Date: Jan 26, 2004
John....dang those are great pics..and the narratives ...well it just makes me dream!.... Cant thank you eonugh for sharing those....and I sure hope you get to feeling better. Snow is A$$-deep to a tall indian here now...drifts at the end of the lane 5 ft high...this internet hangar flying sure helps keep a fellas summertime dreams moving along! Whether technical talk.....or hangar flying...it is all so dang good! I am gonna have to go on the road tomorrow for a few days...and I am gonna be thinking aircraft thoughts now for the whole time!! .this group is the best!..every dang one of ya's! Keep it up men. Don Gherardini FireFly 098 http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Thom Riddle" <jtriddle(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: photoshare
Date: Jan 26, 2004
I am very interested in such a NE get together. The Finger Lakes are always nice but of course there are countless good places in the area. Thom in Buffalo ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Thom Riddle" <jtriddle(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: FireStar II questions
Date: Jan 26, 2004
I know you asked about a FS II w/ 503 but I just had to chime in here with real world data on the early FS single seat w/ 377 and 60" IVO 2-blade prop. My normal cruise is 60 mph IAS (checked with GPS up and down wind avg. at 5300 rpm and 2.1 gph > 28.5 mpg in no wind conditions. This is with full enclosure so it is probably a bit faster than with just a windshield. It will fly at 70 but it is too noisy for my tastes and burns more than 3 gph at that speed. Cheap Thrills! Thom in Buffalo ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 26, 2004
From: Jack & Louise Hart <jbhart(at)ldd.net>
Subject: Lowering FireFly Propeller Thrust Line
FireFlyers & Kolbers, I cut the IVO propeller to 56 inches so that it would clear the tail tube with the belt reducer rotated 135 degrees down from its original position. This drops the thrust line to six inches below that of the Rotax 447. Still waiting for flyable weather so that I can test it out. Out of curiosity, I ran some numbers to see what happens when one lowers the thrust line on a FireFly. Basically, it shows that a higher thrust line adds to the wing and the horizontal tail loads. Flying with a more rear CG reduces wing and horizontal tail loads. By rotating the belt reduction unit 135 degrees down, it drops the thrust line 9.39 inches. The calculations indicate a drop in wing and tail loads of 9.9 pounds with a CG at 37%. If one keeps everything else the same but moves the CG forward to 20% the change in wing and tail loads due to thrust line shift remain the same, but the total loads increase by 18 pounds. Now I must fly the FireFly, to see if the reduction in wing and tail loading will off-set the loss in propeller efficiency by cutting it from 62 to 56 inches. Fuel burn rates from a couple of one half hour flights with the belt reducer in the 45 and the 135 degree off set should indicate if thrust line lowering is effective. The calculations and assumptions can be seen at: http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly101.html Waiting for a 40+ degree, no rain or fog day with the wind below 20 mph. Jack B. Hart FF004 Jackson, MO Jack & Louise Hart jbhart(at)ldd.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: FireStar II questions
Date: Jan 26, 2004
Thx Tom...and all you Firestar owners for the dope!... however...The general conclusion is a FireStar wont really preform much better than my FireFly as far a cruising speed. My numbers with the UL-II-02 are pretty close... 60 mph cruise at 5300...2.5 gph 75 or so WOT (6200) @ 3.5 GPH...maybe higher fuel...have never really held it WOT for very long..I just know it really burns the gas at 6200 which is what Im propped for. MAX hp is 38 @ 6200 ANYway... looks like a 503 FS II will do 2 things the Fly wont...hold a tad more gear an stuff....and burn more gas...but not really cruise faster.??? Now...John H...John W....and all you X-country'in Kolbers....I was under the impression that you guys cruised faster than 60mph...right? when you guys flew MV last year..or ...anywhere else you have been on a "Kolb Karavan" trip.....do you have trouble slowing up for the FireStars?... I Know That where I fly out of..I'm about the fastest cruiser at 60 mph of all the regular flyers...and the Fly really just doesnt fly well below about 50...throttle hunts around...you have to pay to much attention to flying to enjoy it. I have been making 150 mile flights this summer. (got a 10 gal tank now)..just wandering in big circles..ending up back at homeplate and having a ball visiting airports and UL feilds in central Illinois. I reckon what I'm askin is....How do you all get along on a fairly long You can guess that I'm askin all these silly questions because I would dearly luv to join up in a x-country..but I dont want to hold up the caravan...and the trouble is I cant haul any gear for a RON...so I was thinking of a FSII....But it doesnt look like thats the bird to do it in either. Now...all you who where kind enough to share info with me...share your thoughts on this also! thx men... Don Gherardini FireFly 098 http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: FireStar II questions
Date: Jan 26, 2004
> Now...John H...John W....and all you X-country'in Kolbers....I was under the > impression that you guys cruised faster than 60mph...right? Don/Gang: We land 60 mph. :-) My normal cruise is 80 to 90 mph. Whatever Miss P'fer is going to cruise at at 5000 or 5200 rpm. Normally, that is right at 85 mph. Those are about the same numbers for John W's Kolbra powered with the Jab direct drive. He will probably cruise a little faster with the 912S based on a 72" 3 blade warp drive prop over the 58" two blade warp on the Jab. We flew 75 mph all the way from Iron Mountain, MI, to OSH, based on the 503 powered Kit Fox that flew with us. At times, on the Kitty Hawk flight, we were flying 70 to 75, based on Steve Green's 582 powered MK III. The other two 912 MKIII drivers eventually found out if they pushed the little throttle lever forward a tad more, the airplane would fly about 80 mph with ease. Bro Jim and I have been talking about taking some incidence out of the wing on my MK III. We feel one of the biggest drag factors on most of the Kolb models is the high flying tail boom. Takes a lot more power to drag that thing through the air side ways rather than as the Sling Shot and Kolbra do, in a more leve attitude and much smaller profile. We've been thinking about a couple other little tidbits to clean up the air and increase cruise speed. If I stay home and on the ground long enough, we may get around to playing with those projects. I have been flying in the same flight envelope for so long I am quite comfortable where I am. If I can get another 5 mph cruise. Great. If not. Ain't no big thing. Right now I am waiting on a new tachometer to replace the worn out Rotax tach. Even with the prop tach, interpolating the error producing tach's readouts is a pain and not the least bit comfortable. I'll have to wait to get the new 72" Warp Drive dialed in where I want it. Then some nice calm air to recalibrate the ASI and I'll be good to go. Got to pull the gear legs and press the bends and hard landings out of them. Also rewire my instrument panel and intercom/radio. Get this old bod back in some sort of shape, and I'll be ready to do some serious fun flying this coming year. Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GeoR38(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 27, 2004
Subject: Re: The effect of speed reduction on power
In a message dated 1/26/04 6:12:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, jbhart(at)ldd.net writes: > > There is a good explanation of horsepower and torque at: > > > > Jack B. Hart FF004 > Jackson, MO > > > Jack &Louise Hart > jbhart(at)ldd.net > > Jack, that IS a good dissertation on Hp and Torque and I thought I found only one mistake ....but it wasn't ...I read it wrong......:-). But I did read the whole thing, and as I read it, primarily about cars, about Corvettes as a matter of fact, there was a glaring difference in the analogy between cars and planes. And that is Propeller efficiency or efficacy or whatever it is. Both of these e words would be dimensionless ratios or comparisons describing the relationship of the propeller to the effectiveness of interaction to the air. That effectiveness or what ever it is called would obviously be completely diffferent from 0 rpm to 7000 rpm. A car's wheels are ALWAYS on the ground offering a resistance. Not so in an airplane. And one maxim not mentioned is that there is NO work or hp or energy dissipated if there is NO resistance to work, even though you have plenty of rpm. George Randolph firestar driver from the Villages ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GeoR38(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 27, 2004
Subject: Re: Lowering FireFly Propeller Thrust Line
In a message dated 1/26/04 11:54:30 PM Eastern Standard Time, jbhart(at)ldd.net writes: > The calculations and assumptions can be seen at: > > http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly101.html > > Waiting for a 40+ degree, no rain or fog day with the wind below 20 mph. > > Jack B. Hart FF004 > Jackson, MO > Jack, I tried to follow your logic, but got lost at the beginning when you presented your setup formula of balance which I understood to a point. but when you said to substitute for T, I could never duplicate what you got from there on. I "eliminated T" by replacing it with L-W and got a different formula than you. And I know it is different because when making an identity out of your formula and mine, i don't get 0=0 but F=D and I know that isn't right. Just tryin to help. George Randolph Firestar driver from The Villages ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Airgriff2(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 27, 2004
Subject: Re: NE gathering
> > >> Thom, others, >> Lets keep brainstorming this NE get together. >> Why let all the other guys have all the fun, after all we North >> Easters only >> get a few months out of the year to enjoy our birds. >> Denny >> > Denny, Thom and other pilots in the northeast, I'm all for a get together of some kind. Maybe we can set up a Homer Farm fly-in for next summer when most of the list hasn't commited to other flights already. For this summer, if July is busy for some as it has been stated, possibly June would be a good time? If there is interest in a gathering at Cooperstown, NY. let me know and I'll contact the owner. Fly Safe Bob Griffin ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net>
Subject: Re: FireStar II questions
Date: Jan 27, 2004
Help, I lost a sheet of paper that had all the operating RPM's for my ultarstar ,idle,cruise ect, fuel burn ?, need to make a placard , i got that dreaded CRS! thanks ron in 21* west texas,, that's cold to us! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: FireStar II questions > > Thx Tom...and all you Firestar owners for the dope!... > > however...The general conclusion is a FireStar wont really preform much > better than my FireFly as far a cruising speed. > My numbers with the UL-II-02 are pretty close... > 60 mph cruise at 5300...2.5 gph > 75 or so WOT (6200) @ 3.5 GPH...maybe higher fuel...have never really held > it WOT for very long..I just know it really burns the gas at 6200 which is > what Im propped for. MAX hp is 38 @ 6200 > > ANYway... looks like a 503 FS II will do 2 things the Fly wont...hold a tad > more gear an stuff....and burn more gas...but not really cruise faster.??? > > Now...John H...John W....and all you X-country'in Kolbers....I was under the > impression that you guys cruised faster than 60mph...right? > when you guys flew MV last year..or ...anywhere else you have been on a > "Kolb Karavan" trip.....do you have trouble slowing up for the > FireStars?... > I Know That where I fly out of..I'm about the fastest cruiser at 60 mph of > all the regular flyers...and the Fly really just doesnt fly well below about > 50...throttle hunts around...you have to pay to much attention to flying to > enjoy it. > I have been making 150 mile flights this summer. (got a 10 gal tank > now)..just wandering in big circles..ending up back at homeplate and having > a ball visiting airports and UL feilds in central Illinois. > > I reckon what I'm askin is....How do you all get along on a fairly long > You can guess that I'm askin all these silly questions because I would > dearly luv to join up in a x-country..but I dont want to hold up the > caravan...and the trouble is I cant haul any gear for a RON...so I was > thinking of a FSII....But it doesnt look like thats the bird to do it in > either. > > Now...all you who where kind enough to share info with me...share your > thoughts on this also! > > thx men... > > Don Gherardini > FireFly 098 > http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "James, Ken" <KDJames(at)berkscareer.com>
Subject: bmw, what's on top?
Date: Jan 27, 2004
Jim I'm interested in alternate engines and would like to discuss what mods you have made and hear more about your engine as you go. I'm not a Rotax purest and I like the BMW rep in a good solid four cycle engine. This can be done off list/line also. Ken ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Linda Rowe" <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Re: NE gathering
Date: Jan 27, 2004
> > > > > > >> Thom, others, > >> Lets keep brainstorming this NE get together. > >> Why let all the other guys have all the fun, after all we North > >> Easters only > >> get a few months out of the year to enjoy our birds. > >> Denny > >> > > > Denny, Thom and other pilots in the northeast, > I'm all for a get together of some kind. Maybe we can set up a > Homer Farm fly-in for next summer when most of the list hasn't commited to other > flights already. For this summer, if July is busy for some as it has been > stated, possibly June would be a good time? If there is interest in a gathering > at Cooperstown, NY. let me know and I'll contact the owner. > Fly Safe > Bob Griffin > > Bob, The Wellsville Fathers Day fly in is in June and my work schedule will allow me to get there Saturday and Sunday. How do you all feel about just trying to get everyone we can to that one, and if the weather destroys those plans they have a last chance fly in later in the year. How bout it, Dennis Rowe ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: NE gathering
Date: Jan 27, 2004
> If there is interest in a gathering > at Cooperstown, NY. let me know and I'll contact the owner. > Fly Safe > Bob Griffin Bob G/All: If I was going to able to fly up for this one I would love to flyin here: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/Osh%201989/Westville%20AP,%20NY.jpg This is Westville AP, Cooperstown, NY. Was built for a Kolb flyin. Beautiful country to fly in. Grass strip. Cafe on site. Lots of nice green grass to camp on. Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dale Sellers" <dsel1(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: FireStar II questions
Date: Jan 27, 2004
Ron, I would like to have that info too. Dale Sellers ----- Original Message ----- From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: FireStar II questions > > Help, I lost a sheet of paper that had all the operating RPM's for my > ultarstar ,idle,cruise ect, fuel burn ?, need to make a placard , i got > that dreaded CRS! thanks ron in 21* west texas,, that's cold to us! > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net> > To: > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: FireStar II questions > > <donghe@one-eleven.net> > > > > Thx Tom...and all you Firestar owners for the dope!... > > > > however...The general conclusion is a FireStar wont really preform much > > better than my FireFly as far a cruising speed. > > My numbers with the UL-II-02 are pretty close... > > 60 mph cruise at 5300...2.5 gph > > 75 or so WOT (6200) @ 3.5 GPH...maybe higher fuel...have never really held > > it WOT for very long..I just know it really burns the gas at 6200 which is > > what Im propped for. MAX hp is 38 @ 6200 > > > > ANYway... looks like a 503 FS II will do 2 things the Fly wont...hold a > tad > > more gear an stuff....and burn more gas...but not really cruise faster.??? > > > > Now...John H...John W....and all you X-country'in Kolbers....I was under > the > > impression that you guys cruised faster than 60mph...right? > > when you guys flew MV last year..or ...anywhere else you have been on a > > "Kolb Karavan" trip.....do you have trouble slowing up for the > > FireStars?... > > I Know That where I fly out of..I'm about the fastest cruiser at 60 mph of > > all the regular flyers...and the Fly really just doesnt fly well below > about > > 50...throttle hunts around...you have to pay to much attention to flying > to > > enjoy it. > > I have been making 150 mile flights this summer. (got a 10 gal tank > > now)..just wandering in big circles..ending up back at homeplate and > having > > a ball visiting airports and UL feilds in central Illinois. > > > > I reckon what I'm askin is....How do you all get along on a fairly long > > You can guess that I'm askin all these silly questions because I would > > dearly luv to join up in a x-country..but I dont want to hold up the > > caravan...and the trouble is I cant haul any gear for a RON...so I was > > thinking of a FSII....But it doesnt look like thats the bird to do it in > > either. > > > > Now...all you who where kind enough to share info with me...share your > > thoughts on this also! > > > > thx men... > > > > Don Gherardini > > FireFly 098 > > http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 27, 2004
From: "johnjung(at)compusenior.com" <johnjung(at)compusenior.com>
Subject: Re: FireStar II questions
Don and Group, I think that you are right about the Firestar not being a good enough cross-country machine to fly with the 912's. Even if the speed was pushed up and they slowed down, the range would still be short because of the 503's high fuel burn. If you held that 2SI at 70 mph for at least 5 gallons, you would probably find that it would only take about an hour. Because I have room for a tent, sleeping bag and other gear, I believe that I could travel on long trips with my Firestar. Dave and Will did it. The only problem that I have had is being comfortable enough to sit that long. My Original Firestar have a seat that I could sit in all day, but not the Firestar II. I have added memory foam to the seat, but haven't taken a long flight to test it. The one thing that would help the Firestar II, to be a better cross-country machine, is a four-cycle engine that would allow an 80 mph cruise at a reasonable fuel burn. I currently am using a full enclosure with sound insulation and 80 is feasable except for fuel burn. John Jung Firestar II 503 N6163J Surprise, AZ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: FireStar II questions
Date: Jan 27, 2004
Thx John W... Boy,,,I would like to fly in formation with you also...but.....above 70 is stem wound for my Fly and the Cuyuna....sure..it will fly 75 maybe 78...but I just cant bear the thought of running any engine WOT for more than a little bit...temps go up...I can just hear those rings rubbin away! at 60..to 65 it will do ok....but that is about it. I have 41 hours on it now...and I like the bird alot....but ..kinda like a dirt bike, it handles great...nimble, responsive, but not to good for a road trip!. Course..I already knew that...and as I have said before, I bought this kit because it was a good deal...not because I was shopping for a Kolb...figgered on sellin it pretty quick. What I didnt figger on is falling in luv with the way it handles! The dang thing makes a fella want to do things in an airplane he should not do...or at least not in a Kolb....maybe a Pitts...or a Chaos....but not a FireFly!... best way to describe the FireFly I have decided is she's a "Temptress!" I sure do like this bird!...but the call of the far blue skies is in my ears, and I guess I'm just trying to figger out what to ride next. Anyway...had to postpone my road trip today...at least for a while due to White-out conditions here...Old man winter is really a growlin! Might be able to get out of here in a few hours. Don Gherardini Sales / Engineering dept. American Honda Engines Power Equipment Company CortLand, Illinois 800-626-7326 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 27, 2004
From: Eugene Zimmerman <eugenezimmerman(at)dejazzd.com>
Subject: Re: NE gathering
Rowe wrote: > The Wellsville Fathers Day fly in is in June and my work schedule will allow > me to get there Saturday and Sunday. > How do you all feel about just trying to get everyone we can to that one, > and if the weather destroys those plans they have a last chance fly in later > in the year. > How bout it, > Dennis Rowe > The Wellsville Fathers Day fly in will have at least a half a dozen or more local Kolb drivers if the weather is flyable. Some of us would be happy to join a Homer farm ambush. Lots of other local grass strips in the area too. Gene ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: FireStar II questions
Date: Jan 27, 2004
John Jung Yes sirree...you are reading my thoughts. A 4 stroke with a 75 to 80 cruise would satisfy me fine. Better fuel burn..so you dont need to carry so much fuel. Trouble is It does not sound like most of the fellas think a FS II will handle the horsepower thet a 80 mph cruise would take. At least that is kinda the conclusion I have drawn from my inquiry. I have larger engines avail right here in the barn..but Dennis Souder told me the FlreFly has thinner wall tubing in the cage than a Firestar...so if the FireStar wont handle more than 50 hp or so, the FireFly certainly wouldnt. Might not even handle 50. AS far as the Fuel rate on the Cuyuna....I would not be suprised if you are right...and holding the hammer down it might burn 5 gph...about the hardest I have ever ran it at length was trying to keep up with w 503 powered Team EROS(minimax)....we ran at 75 for about 20 minutes...I stayed right with him, I was running about wide open most of the time, and I was not expecting him to run that fast, and when we turned around to RTB....I kinda cut in an took the lead at a slower pace...and he slowed down to stay with me. I Had the Stock 5 gal jug fuel tank in it then...and when we got back to homeplate....I was periously low on fuel. When we landed first thing he asked was.."How fast were we going?"...I told him..and he said oh... When I asked him what he was reading..he said..."well..I dunno..ASI never gets above 40 mph, I think its busted" This Guy...he is a great wingman to fly with..as he is cautious..and very smooth...but he has no radio..and now I know no ASI....Im thinking about buying he a dang radio!!! You say the New FSI has a different seat huh?....I didnt realize that...I need to find a pic of one I think. Don Gherardini Sales / Engineering dept. American Honda Engines Power Equipment Company CortLand, Illinois 800-626-7326 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Rotax 912 School
Date: Jan 27, 2004
Hi Gang: Will be attending the Rotax 912 School 1, 2, 3 Feb 04, at South Mississippi Light Aircraft, Lucedale, MS. I had the opportunity to attend four years ago when I picked up my new 912S. This will be a good chance to get updated on the 912/912S/914. If any of you have any specific questions you need answered, let me know bc. I'll see if I can get the answers from Eric Tucker during the course. Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "James, Ken" <KDJames(at)berkscareer.com>
Subject: Re: NE gathering
Date: Jan 27, 2004
Maybe I could bum a ride in a Kolb at Wellsville. Help keep me building. To Dam Cold in the garage to do any work and for some reason my wife won't let me drag a wing into the dinning room she funny that way :-) Ken -----Original Message----- From: Eugene Zimmerman [mailto:eugenezimmerman(at)dejazzd.com] Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: NE gathering Rowe wrote: > The Wellsville Fathers Day fly in is in June and my work schedule will allow > me to get there Saturday and Sunday. > How do you all feel about just trying to get everyone we can to that one, > and if the weather destroys those plans they have a last chance fly in later > in the year. > How bout it, > Dennis Rowe > The Wellsville Fathers Day fly in will have at least a half a dozen or more local Kolb drivers if the weather is flyable. Some of us would be happy to join a Homer farm ambush. Lots of other local grass strips in the area too. Gene ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 27, 2004
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Coordinates for Homer's strip
Does anybody have the lat/longs for Homer Kolb's strip? Thanks Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net>
Subject: Re: NE gathering
Date: Jan 27, 2004
put it in the bedroom, she WILL change her mind and let you use the dining room ,ha!!! To Dam Cold in the garage to do any work and for some reason my wife won't let me drag a wing into the dinning room she funny that way ----- Original Message ----- From: "James, Ken" <KDJames(at)berkscareer.com> Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Re: NE gathering ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 27, 2004
From: Earl & Mim Zimmerman <emzi(at)supernet.com>
Subject: Re: Super Kolbra Update
John Williamson wrote: > > Gentlemen, > > The Rotax 912 ULS 100 hp engine might be little "Over Kill" when installed > on a Kolb Kolbra. But I'm gonna keep it. Oh! Please stop!! Your making us all cry!! :-) Good for you sounds like fun! -- Earl ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 27, 2004
Subject: Re: NE Kolb Homecoming
From: Scott Trask <sctrask(at)diisd.org>
(not processed: message from valid local sender) on 1/26/04 3:34 PM, Richard & Martha Neilsen at NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net wrote: > > > This sounds interesting but around July 4th isn't good for me and near the > end of July I will be heading for Oshkosh. Which brings to mind an earlier > post of mine about getting a group to fly into Oshkosh this year. Anyone > interested??? > > Rick Neilsen > Redrive VW powered MKIIIc > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Linda Rowe" <rowedl(at)highstream.net> > To: > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: NE Kolb Homecoming Hi Rick and list I'll be planning on flying in again into OSH this year. It will be my 12th year on flying in. You're more than welcome to stop here again and fly in with me. Rick, I'll even cut a few more tree limbs off for you. John W. I'll cut some more ferns at the end of the runway for you. Those Alaskan travelers could swing in on their way back from Alaska (with whale blubber on their breaths). There's always fresh venison here in the U.P. ( NOT freezer burned, John H.). I do realize that it would be a little far north for you guys coming from Alaska, but know that you are welcome. The Homecoming gathering would be nice. As long as the group doesn't stay too long. I would think everyone could meet someplace else and everybody could fly in together, if this wasn't already thought of. You guys in the N.E. should gather at the week-long Yankee fly-in in July. I haven't gone in 3 years. We were attending every year prior to that. It's a great time! Scott Trask IMT ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 27, 2004
From: Terry <tkrolfe(at)usadatanet.net>
Subject: Fly-in
Denny, Richard, all I like the idea of staging a Homer Kolb fly-in this year. It's one of those things that gets put of and then never done if not now. It only takes someone to come up with a date and then do it. I can make it anytime, weather permitting, so it should be arranged for when the most working Kolbers could make. Open to suggestions. What ever date would be agreed on, prior contact should be made with Homer to see if he is agreeable and available. I have flown into his farm to show him my FireFly and found him to be very gracious of his time. Still I think we would want to make prior arrangements for a group fly-in. As an alternative: I think the fly-in at Wellsville is a good choice. It is already a major UL fly-in each year and well attended when the weather allows. Last year was a wash because of weather! Grass strip with facilities, lodging and fuel! Get to see allot of other UL's there! I see that John has already answered Richard's question about coordinates for Homer's farm. You might be surprised as to how close you will be flying to a nuclear power plant which is right across the Schuylkill River from his place. They also have an airport right next to the power plant called Pottstown/Limerick and it's something else to fly into and out of next to those big stacks. This is where Homer first learned to fly long before the nuclear power plant was built So let's hear some dates and rain dates for a North East fly-in! Then it can be resolved as to where. Terry - FireFly #95 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Russell Phillips" <rphillip1999(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: N E Gathering
Date: Jan 28, 2004
That would be great to have more Kolbs at Footlight Ranch in Wellsville, Pa. I've been going the last 8 or 9 years missing it just once. There is where I got my first ride in a Kolb which convinced me thats the way to go. I'm about 3/4 the way done with my Mark III now. The camping there is fine (right next to the runway) and there is a bunkhouse where you can reserve a room ahead. They have a website if you want to learn more about the place. It is www.footlightranch.com (they don't update it often) . When the weather is good, 70 to 75 aircraft is common for the Fathers Day Flyin. Its a real friendly place. Hope many of youmake the trip. I'll be there, planeless :(butstill smilingbecause of all the small planes nearby. Russ Building Mark III Classic SW N.Y. "cold and snowy" Check out the coupons and bargains on MSN Offers! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Denny Rowe" <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: NE Kolb gathering
Date: Jan 28, 2004
Kolbers, So it looks like we will all try to make Wellsville for the Fathers day fly in. If time allows maybe we can put together a sorty to Homers. As I mentioned before, I am off work the week of independance day and am open to ideas. Denny ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Airgriff2(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 28, 2004
Subject: Re: NE gathering comes together!!
> > >> >> > Bob, >> The Wellsville Fathers Day fly in is in June and my work schedule >> will allow >> me to get there Saturday and Sunday. >> How do you all feel about just trying to get everyone we can to that >> one, >> and if the weather destroys those plans they have a last chance fly >> in later >> in the year. >> How bout it, >> Dennis Rowe >> > OK gang From the feed back on todays list there does't seem much interest to fly into Cooperstown. Thanks for the photo, John H., yes that if the field I'm talking about. Since you were there the new owner sunk $750,000.00 into it and loves to see UL's come in. Maybe another time we can schedual a fly-in there. Most of the interest seems to be leading for flying into Wellsville PA.from fellas like Denny, Gene, Richard, Earl, Russel. Lets get one person to coordiate and head it up. Any volunteers ? Who is the most familiar with the event ? We need the exact dates, identifier, facilities availiable, such as showers, camping, food, fuel etc. Someone even mentioned a flight from wellsville to Homers ? How far a trip is that ? Anyway, someone take the raines here and let's plan a Northeast Gathering of Kolbs at the Wellsville PA Fly-in. Fly Safe Bob Griffin ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 28, 2004
From: Ted Cowan <tcowan1917(at)direcway.com>
Subject: Re: fuel burn
Howdy folks. Like to make some comments on fuel burn. As some might recall, built myself a great little slingshot, 582 blue head. Started out around five gals an hour burn at around 75-80 asi. I realigned the engine seveal times until I had 3/4 inch higher on the back mounts than the front and now I am getting as high as 20 minute per gal at around 72 to 15/17 minute per gal burn at 80. It goes to about 14 minute per gal burn up to 90 +. Now, mind you that it is cold outside and that is solo and this plane is clean up there. My egts run in around 1050 and my chts are consistently at 265. My water temps seem to stay at 164 (with one width of duct tape across the rad) (two strips increase temps 5 degrees). I have heard that I am running too lean to get that kind of gas mileage but my plugs are light tan (redish) on the tips and I am running BR8eVs. (Love those platnums) Easy start, better performance and last longer. That is what I am getting so far. I have 30 hours on the "Greezd Lightn'n" so far and loving every minute of it. I modified the rear castor wheel to break when almost sideways. Gives me better control if it doesnt break so easy. (someone on the list suggested this). And -- by the way, must have done something right cause I can let go of the stick at any speed - up to 90 so far - and it will cruise straight, no dips, slips or slides to the side. Did I mention I love this plane? See ya. Ted Cowan, Alabama ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Airgriff2(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 28, 2004
Subject: Re: NE gathering
> > >> >> The Wellsville Fathers Day fly in will have at least a half a dozen >> or >> more local Kolb drivers if the weather is flyable. Some of us would >> be >> happy to join a Homer farm ambush. Lots of other local grass strips >> in >> the area too. >> >> Gene >> > Gene and gang, Checking on Airnav,, the flight from Wellsville to Homers is roughly 67 NM. Around 1hr. 15 min. one way , for Kolbs cruising around 65 MPH. Sounds like that could work out. Depending on some planes fuel capicity, wind conditions, and reserve, arrangements may need to be made for fuel at Homers. Fly Safe Bob Griffin Upstate NY ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Joe Allman" <fisherallman(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: fuel burn
Date: Jan 28, 2004
Ted, I can count on five/hour at 5800 and 85 indicated. I'm set up for climb with a 582 ss ivo. Joe -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Ted Cowan Subject: Kolb-List: Re: fuel burn Howdy folks. Like to make some comments on fuel burn. As some might recall, built myself a great little slingshot, 582 blue head. Started out around five gals an hour burn at around 75-80 asi. I realigned the engine.... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dale Sellers" <dsel1(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: fuel burn
Date: Jan 28, 2004
Ted, Where in ALA. you live? I'm just across the border at Columbus, GA. Dale Sellers ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ted Cowan" <tcowan1917(at)direcway.com> Subject: Kolb-List: Re: fuel burn > > Howdy folks. Like to make some comments on fuel burn. As some might > recall, built myself a great little slingshot, 582 blue head. Started out > around five gals an hour burn at around 75-80 asi. I realigned the engine > seveal times until I had 3/4 inch higher on the back mounts than the front > and now I am getting as high as 20 minute per gal at around 72 to 15/17 > minute per gal burn at 80. It goes to about 14 minute per gal burn up to 90 > +. Now, mind you that it is cold outside and that is solo and this plane is > clean up there. My egts run in around 1050 and my chts are consistently at > 265. My water temps seem to stay at 164 (with one width of duct tape across > the rad) (two strips increase temps 5 degrees). I have heard that I am > running too lean to get that kind of gas mileage but my plugs are light tan > (redish) on the tips and I am running BR8eVs. (Love those platnums) Easy > start, better performance and last longer. That is what I am getting so > far. I have 30 hours on the "Greezd Lightn'n" so far and loving every > minute of it. I modified the rear castor wheel to break when almost > sideways. Gives me better control if it doesnt break so easy. (someone on > the list suggested this). And -- by the way, must have done something right > cause I can let go of the stick at any speed - up to 90 so far - and it will > cruise straight, no dips, slips or slides to the side. Did I mention I love > this plane? See ya. Ted Cowan, Alabama > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 28, 2004
From: Eugene Zimmerman <eugenezimmerman(at)dejazzd.com>
Subject: Re: NE gathering comes together!!
Airgriff2(at)aol.com wrote: >>OK gang > >>From the feed back on todays list there does't seem much interest to fly into > Cooperstown. Thanks for the photo, John H., yes that if the field I'm > talking about. Since you were there the new owner sunk $750,000.00 into it and loves > to see UL's come in. Maybe another time we can schedual a fly-in there. Most > of the interest seems to be leading for flying into Wellsville PA.from fellas > like Denny, Gene, Richard, Earl, Russel. Lets get one person to coordiate and > head it up. Any volunteers ? Who is the most familiar with the event ? We > need the exact dates, identifier, facilities availiable, such as showers, > camping, food, fuel etc. > Someone even mentioned a flight from wellsville to Homers ? How far a trip > is that ? > Anyway, someone take the raines here and let's plan a Northeast Gathering of > Kolbs at the Wellsville PA Fly-in. > Fly Safe > Bob Griffin > Terry has done a good job organizing several local flyins last year. I'd be happy to volunteer him for the job of point man. Sorry Terry, but you are good. :-) 1:15 to 1:30 hrs. sounds about right to get to Homers' strip or less with a tail wind. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steven Green" <kolbdriver(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Oshkosh
Date: Jan 27, 2004
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Re: e-mail
Date: Jan 28, 2004
Good news. I couldn't figure out what the problem was............thought we had parted friends last summer. :-) I emailed you about the air filter we had discussed. I NEED it. Lar. Do not Archive. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Building Kolb Mk III N78LB Vamoose www.gogittum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Petty" <ppetty@c-gate.net> Subject: Kolb-List: e-mail > > Lar/guys, > > A couple of months ago I had my ISP block all e-mails to ppetty@c-gate.net to rid myself of the spam problem I was having. If you are not on the list that I gave the ISP the e-mails go into a spam folder and don't go back to you as a returned ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 29, 2004
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Fly to Homer's
I am starting to get serious about going to Homer Kolb's strip over Father's Day weekend. Think about it. We could fly together. I will be asking Vince Nicely (Firestar II) if he wants to go with us. rp ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Denny Rowe" <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Re: Fly to Homer's
Date: Jan 29, 2004
----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Pike" <rwpike(at)charter.net> Subject: Kolb-List: Fly to Homer's > > I am starting to get serious about going to Homer Kolb's strip over > Father's Day weekend. Think about it. We could fly together. I will be > asking Vince Nicely (Firestar II) if he wants to go with us. > rp > > > Richard, others, Check out Footlight Ranch on line to get all the info on the Fathers Day Fly-in, seems like meeting up there, and taking a mass side trip to see Mr Kolb would be a mighty fine way to salute the father of these Great machines we are so proud of. Denny Rowe, Leechburg, PA ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 29, 2004
From: Terry <tkrolfe(at)usadatanet.net>
Subject: Fathers Day fly-in
Eugene, Bob, Eugene, Richard, Denny and all others, I will act as the contact person if that's what the gang wants. The Wellsville Fathers Day Fly-In is a long established event that runs the whole weekend. We could meet there and then if possible make at journey to Homer's. There is a good stop off airport on the way at Smoketown, Lancaster County that is UL friendly. If you want more information on Wellsville go to their web page at footlightranch.com and hit Mason-Dixion Ultralight Fly-in or the others. The information is for last years fly-in which was canceled because of weather, but you can explore the facilities available and get the data about the airstrip there. I know they would welcome a good group of new Kolb's arriving there! Terry - FireFly #95 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 29, 2004
From: Eugene Zimmerman <eugenezimmerman(at)dejazzd.com>
Subject: Re: Fathers Day fly-in
Thanks Terry, You da man! Just don't pray quite so hard for rain this year, OK? :-) Terry wrote: > > Eugene, Bob, Eugene, Richard, Denny and all others, > > I will act as the contact person if that's what the gang wants. The > Wellsville Fathers Day Fly-In is a long established event that runs the > whole weekend. We could meet there and then if possible make at journey > to Homer's. There is a good stop off airport on the way at Smoketown, > Lancaster County that is UL friendly. > > If you want more information on Wellsville go to their web page at > footlightranch.com and hit Mason-Dixion Ultralight Fly-in or the > others. The information is for last years fly-in which was canceled > because of weather, but you can explore the facilities available and get > the data about the airstrip there. > I know they would welcome a good group of new Kolb's arriving there! > > Terry - FireFly #95 > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Judy or Larry Gitt" <gittj(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Paul petty
Date: Jan 29, 2004
I wonder if you got all the consturction Pictures i sent to you of my kolbra as i never did get a reply ? As i was wondering what was going on after sending all them to you .As i sure was wondering;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ??? larry G ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Judy or Larry Gitt" <gittj(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Kolbra
Date: Jan 29, 2004
I think you got a hot rod now for a kolb , It sure sounds like it be a fun ride full power on stall, WoW::::::::: What is the empty weight with 912 on it now ?? What it is like to fly level at 110 as i have to dive mind to get to that speed ? Look out guys , John will be all over this county now and in no time , good work John . Larry G ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steven Green" <kolbdriver(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Fly to Homer's
Date: Jan 29, 2004
Richard and all, I have a new I-net provider and my new address in kolbdriver(at)bellsouth.net I have been following the talk about a trip to Homer's place with great inertest. Last year I started a trip to the sentimental journey fly-in with a return trip by Homer's but the weather didn,t cooperate and KY is as far as I got. I am having a personal problem with priorities and time management, I have only flown 5.4 hours since the Kolb homecoming/ Kittyhawk trip. Building a house should not interfer with flying. Oh well wishfull thinking. I hope to be moved in by May at the latest and resume the more important activities in life FLYING. Steven ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Thom Riddle" <jtriddle(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: Fathers Day fly-in
Date: Jan 29, 2004
Now that John W. has a really fast airplane I was wondering if you guys would mind if I came to the Wellsville Fly-in in my Cherokee. It is not much faster than John's Super Kolbra now. I've already got other plans for that weekend which would prevent me from making that long round-trip in the early FS/377 but would allow me to come in the Cherokee. Both Wellsville and Kolb's place would accommodate a LTOL airplane like the Cherokee. Thom in Buffalo ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Aaron Hollingsworth" <aaron(at)gamespeak.com>
Subject: flooding
Date: Jan 29, 2004
I think I flooded my 618 today. I recall the previous owner warning me not to prime it or only once when the weather is warmer (like today)... of course I forgot and gave it a good 3 pushes of the primer. Now trying to recover from flooding it, I was unable :/ I first pulled the back plug in each cylinder. They were a little wet, but not dripping. I blew them off with my air compressor and put them back in. About 10-15 minutes had passed by this point. I tried again, no go.... So I did the same to the front plug in each, tried again... no go. Next I called up the previous owner... got a couple tips to try; pulled all four, opened full throttle and while plugs are out cranked it over 10-15 times. Blew off all four plugs. Put em back in.. tried again... no go. during this whole time the engine never even started to crank over. Plenty of amps on battery (12.9 and even hooked up to charger for last few tests). The starter motor did great... just as fast as it always is when it starts up. Now, I am pretty sure that I did flood it... but logic is telling me that I should have been able to recover without letting it sit overnight? Hopefully it will start up tomorrow without issue. this is the first time it hasn't started in 4-5 turns. Any suggestions on how to recover should I flood it again int the future? Aaron ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 29, 2004
From: Robert Laird <rlaird(at)cavediver.com>
Subject: Re: flooding
At 06:59 PM 1/29/2004, you wrote: >recover without letting it sit overnight? Hopefully it will start up >tomorrow without issue. this is the first time it hasn't started in 4-5 >turns. Any suggestions on how to recover should I flood it again int the >future? Replace the plugs with new ones, properly gapped. -- R ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Thom Riddle" <jtriddle(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: flooding
Date: Jan 29, 2004
I've had success in clearing flooded engines by doing most of the things you mentioned, Aaron, plus burn out the rich fuel mixture in the cylinder with a long reach lighter; the kind that has a trigger and long skinny tube where the flame comes out of the end of the tube. One difference in your procedure though. Crank the engine w/o plugs and throttle completely closed, not open. Thom in Buffalo ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Edward Chmielewski" <edchmiel(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: flooding
Date: Jan 29, 2004
Hi Aaron, Is there spark? Sounds like it's not even trying, did you get any indication it wanted to fire? Pull 1 plug from each cylinder, connect to the plug wire, crank the engine with the base of the plug in contact with the engine to create the ground path. Best done with as little light as possible, close the hangar door. Spark should be strong and blue. If not, suspect the ignition circuit. Good luck with it. Ed in JXN MkII/503 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aaron Hollingsworth" <aaron(at)gamespeak.com> Subject: Kolb-List: flooding > > I think I flooded my 618 today. I recall the previous owner warning me not to prime it or only once when the weather is warmer (like today)... of course I forgot and gave it a good 3 pushes of the primer. Now trying to recover from flooding it, I was unable :/ > (Snip) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chuck Davis - Comcast" <davis207(at)comcast.net>
Subject: NE gathering
Date: Jan 29, 2004
I am definately in for a Wellsville / Homer fly-in. It's already been cleared with the "boss". I now commute over from Princeton, NJ to the next town over from Phoenixville. Every morning I see the cooling tower from the Nuke plant that some one mentioned is just across the river from "the farm." The tower and the column of steam certainly will make it easy to find! Regarding fuel, being one of the "locals" I guess I'll volunteer to have a few gallons cached in advance if the "planning staff" receives some requests and can secure permission from Homer. I'm already looking forward to seeing Richard, Bob, Denny, Gene, Earl, Russel and anyone else. Chuck > From: Airgriff2(at)aol.com Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: NE gathering > > >> >> The Wellsville Fathers Day fly in will have at least a half a dozen >> or >> more local Kolb drivers if the weather is flyable. Some of us would >> be >> happy to join a Homer farm ambush. Lots of other local grass strips >> in >> the area too. >> >> Gene >> > Gene and gang, Checking on Airnav,, the flight from Wellsville to Homers is roughly 67 NM. Around 1hr. 15 min. one way , for Kolbs cruising around 65 MPH. Sounds like that could work out. Depending on some planes fuel capicity, wind conditions, and reserve, arrangements may need to be made for fuel at Homers. Fly Safe Bob Griffin Upstate NY > > > > > ________________________________ Message 21 ____________________________________ > > > From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net> > Subject: Kolb-List: Fly to Homer's > > > I am starting to get serious about going to Homer Kolb's strip over > Father's Day weekend. Think about it. We could fly together. I will be > asking Vince Nicely (Firestar II) if he wants to go with us. > rp > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Flooded Engine
Date: Jan 29, 2004
Hi Gang: Well, ............ here's the way I do it, four stroke or two stroke, real airplane engine or not. There is a little different procedure for electric and manual start. Manual Start: 1. Switch off. 2. Throttle full. 3. Pull it through vigorously three or four or five times. 4. Throttle closed. 5. Switch on. 6. Pull it through and start. 7. If it doesn't start because the engine is cold, then open enricher, leave throttle shut, switch on, and pull it through to start. Electric Start: 1. Full throttle. 2. Be sure the pilot is in the seat. 3. Hit the starter until it starts firing, reducing power as the engine clears itself. Doesn't normally require removing plugs, replacing plugs, unless you really screwed them up. Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Denny Rowe" <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Re: Will Uribe
Date: Jan 30, 2004
. If I keep loosing weight I'm will need to add counter > weights on the nose of my FireStar. > Thanks for asking > Regards, > Will Uribe > El Paso, TX > FireStar II N4GU > C-172 N2506U > http Will, If you make it back to Pittsburgh this summer, we'll do our best to put some meat back on your bones, I can taste the burgers tomatoes and sweet corn now. :-) Take Care , Denny PS: I'll even throw in a Mk-3 ride. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Denny Rowe" <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Fw: [sonextalk] Fw: [Fwd: FW: Men & Tools]
Date: Jan 30, 2004
Kolbers, I got this from the Sonex list, thought you folks would enjoy it too. Denny I thought I'd send this on for all the newbies to warn them about what tools are really for. Matt ----- Original Message ----- > > > -----Original Message > > > > > > > > >Men and tools: > > > > > >HAMMER: > > >Originally employed as a weapon of war, > > >the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to > > >locate expensive parts not far from the object we are trying to hit. > > > > > >ELECTRIC HAND DRILL: > > >Normally used for spinning steel Pop rivets in their holes > > >until you die of old age, but it also works great for drilling > > >mounting holes in fenders just above the brake line that goes > > >to the rear wheel. > > > > > >PLIERS: > > >Used to round off bolt heads. > > > > > >HACKSAW: > > >One of a family of cutting tools built on the original sin principle. > > >It transforms human energy into a crooked, unpredictable motion, > > >and the more you attempt to influence its course, the more > > >dismal your future becomes. > > > > > >VISE-GRIPS: > > >Used to round off bolt heads. > > >If nothing else is available, they can also be used to transfer > > >intense welding heat to the palm of your hand. > > > > > >OXYACETYLENE TORCH: > > >Used almost entirely for setting various flammable > > >objects in your garage on fire. Also handy for igniting the > > >grease inside a brake drum you're trying to get > > >the bearing race out of. > > > > > >DRILL PRESS: > > >A tall upright machine useful for suddenly snatching flat metal > > >bar stock out of your hands so that it smacks you in the chest and flings > > >your coffee across the room, splattering it against that freshly painted > > >part you were drying. > > > > > >WIRE WHEEL: > > >Cleans rust off old bolts and then throws them somewhere under > > >the workbench with the speed of light. > > >Also removes fingerprint whorls and hard-earned guitar calluses > > >in about the time it takes you to say, "Fuc...." > > > > > >TWEEZERS: > > >A tool for removing wood splinters. > > > > > >E-Z OUT BOLT AND STUD EXTRACTOR: > > >A tool that snaps off in bolt > > >holes and is ten times harder than any known drill bit. > > > > > >TWO-TON HYDRAULIC ENGINE HOIST: > > >A handy tool for testing the tensile strength of ground straps > > >and brake lines you may have forgotten to disconnect. > > > > > >BATTERY ELECTROLYTE TESTER: > > >A handy tool for transferring sulfuric acid from a car battery > > >to the inside of your toolbox after determining that your > > >battery is dead as a doornail, just as you thought. > > > > > >PHILLIPS SCREWDRIVER: > > >Normally used to stab the lids of old-style > > >paper-and-tin oil cans and splash oil on your shirt; can also be used, > > >as the name implies, to round off Phillips screw heads. > > >PRY BAR: > > >A tool used to crumple the metal surrounding that clip or > > >bracket you needed to remove in order to replace a 50 cent part. > > > > > >HOSE CUTTER: > > >A tool used to cut hoses 1/2 inch too short ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Denny Rowe" <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Re: Fathers Day fly-in
Date: Jan 30, 2004
> > Now that John W. has a really fast airplane I was wondering if you guys would mind if I came to the Wellsville Fly-in in my Cherokee. It is not much faster than John's Super Kolbra now. I've already got other plans for that weekend which would prevent me from making that long round-trip in the early FS/377 but would allow me to come in the Cherokee. Both Wellsville and Kolb's place would accommodate a LTOL airplane like the Cherokee. > > Thom in Buffalo > I Don't mind at all Thom, I earned my private in a PA 28, I'll even take you for a Mk-3 ride to ease your pain if time allows. I just hope that we get dry weather, last summer was as soggy as I have ever seen it around here. Denny ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Airgriff2(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 30, 2004
Subject: Re: Will Uribe
Hi'Will, Really glad to hear your surgery went well and no cancer was found. Enjoy your time off the best you can. Could probably squeese in some flight planning?. Bob Griffin ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Airgriff2(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 30, 2004
Subject: Re: Fathers Day fly-in
> Thom from Bufflo writes: > >> I was wondering if you guys would mind >> if I came to the Wellsville Fly-in in my Cherokee. > Who cares what you bring or come in? Fly, drive, walk, at least you'll be there, that's what counts. Your Cherokee may learn something also by watching the other planes climb out at 1000 FPM.+ Fly Safe Bob Griffin ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Scott Olendorf" <solendor(at)nycap.rr.com>
Subject: Fathers Day flyin
Date: Jan 30, 2004
Count me in for the Fathers day fly-in at Footlight ranch. I'll be following Bob Griffin down if I can keep up with him. Scott Olendorf Firestar, Rotax 447 and Powerfin prop. Schenectady, NY http://home.nycap.rr.com/firestar ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Thom Riddle" <jtriddle(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: Fathers Day fly-in
Date: Jan 30, 2004
Thanks guys...I can take the ribbing and I would very much like to meet you guys and ride in some of your REAL airplanes. My son-in-law has decided he wants to learn to fly and I've been giving him some ground school but need a 2-place trainer to do the airwork, of course. So... I am in the market for a 2-place to train him in and will probably sell my interest in the Cherokee at that time. Actually, we had the prop repitched last year for climb and lightly loaded 63Charlie will climb at 1100-1200 fpm under standard conditions. If the runway is very soggy though, I may not be able to use it. If that happens, there is a paved airport northwest of Wellsville (Carlisle - N94) and one southeast (York - THV). Perhaps one of you two-holer drivers could pick me up from there in case the grass is swampy. Thom in Buffalo ________________________________________________________________________________
From: PaulServaty(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 30, 2004
Subject: Re: Kolb-List Digest: 21 Msgs - 01/28/04
Fm Paul Servaty(at)aol.com Hi Gang 1st time sending on internet so please accept errors. I own a used 1987 Kolb KX Firestar (5-rib wing). Restored it and have over 400 flight hours & 800 landings in 2 1/2 years. Trailered to Wellsville 2 years ago, Sun-Fun twice &last years Kolb open house. I would like to join up with you this Fathers Day at Wellsville, PA & visit Homer Kolb. I met him last year at Sun&Fun and he is great person. Paul Servaty Clements, MD DO NOT ARCHIEVE ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Fathers Day fly-in
Date: Jan 30, 2004
Terry You can put me down for a maybe. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIc ----- Original Message ----- From: "Terry" <tkrolfe(at)usadatanet.net> Subject: Kolb-List: Fathers Day fly-in > > Eugene, Bob, Eugene, Richard, Denny and all others, > > I will act as the contact person if that's what the gang wants. The > Wellsville Fathers Day Fly-In is a long established event that runs the > whole weekend. We could meet there and then if possible make at journey > to Homer's. There is a good stop off airport on the way at Smoketown, > Lancaster County that is UL friendly. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "James and Cathy Tripp" <jtripp(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Starter on Rotax 503
Date: Jan 30, 2004
Listers, I'm trying to decide which starter to put on my FS. For those who have an electric start 503, what starter are you using? Any experience with the Rotax starter used in connection with a canister type BRS that's mounted on top of the wing in front of the engine? Does the starter interfere with the placement of the BRS? What are your thoughts/reports on the GPL starter? As always, thanks for the suggestions and opinions. You always come through. James Tripp, FSII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net>
Subject: trailer plans
Date: Jan 30, 2004
about 3-4 months ago someone sent me a drawing of a trailer for a ultrastar, it was too small to read, and was resent as a larger one,, and I have lost, misplaced, deleted it , it ain't here no more, whoever sent it , please send again. thanks ron w in windy west tx. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Firestar mods
Date: Jan 30, 2004
John H., and all the gang John, I have been studying your old FireStar pics and the mods. I have my Fly in the shed for the winter tore down and I am considering a few mods to it also. So naturally those pics are very interesting to me. Let me ask you a question, relying on your "hindsight" If you had it to do over... Would you have done any different? if so what? I realise that the big tank raised your weight...but...even considering this..do you think that the enclosing of the rear cage area gave you any more speed? Did it give you a more effiecient cruise? Enclosing the rear of my FireFly is a mod I am considering, along with adding fiberglass seat and whatever cage mods it takes to accomplish this.and then some sort of better wing gap cover...semi permenant...or permenant...not just sure yet. Any suggestions you might have I would like to throw in the box along with all the builders ideas I am compiling from builders websites, which there are a lot of good ones. Jim H...Dennis S.....and anyone else who might be reading this...all suggestions/ideas are welcome. Ill throw em all in an shake em up.... Think on this awhile boys...no hurry...didnt get above 6 below today and started snowing again...so its not like im in a big hurry!!!! Don Gherardini FireFly 098 http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GeoR38(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 30, 2004
Subject: Re: flooding
In a message dated 1/29/04 9:25:30 PM Eastern Standard Time, edchmiel(at)mindspring.com writes: > Hi Aaron, > > Is there spark? Sounds like it's not even trying, did you get any > indication it > wanted to fire? Pull 1 plug from each cylinder, connect to the plug wire, > crank the > engine with the base of the plug in contact with the engine to create the > ground path. > Best done with as little light as possible, close the hangar door. Spark > should be strong > and blue. If not, suspect the ignition circuit. Good luck with it. > > Ed in JXN > MkII/503 > and do NOT be satisfied with a white or yellow spark....it MUST Be Blue!!! Don't ask how I know George Randolph ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Firestar mods
Date: Jan 30, 2004
Hi Don G/All: Glad it is not us "southern" boys having to endure the below zero weather. > Let me ask you a question, relying on your "hindsight" If you had it to do > over... > > Would you have done any different? if so what? Well, about the only thing I would have done differently would be learn to fly the old Firestar within its design flight envelope. > I realise that the big tank raised your weight...but...even considering > this..do you think that the enclosing of the rear cage area gave you any > more speed? > Did it give you a more effiecient cruise? The original Firestar fuselage was always fully covered, top and bottom. Small diameter 4130 streamlined lift struts added significantly to performance of my Firestar. I think the added fabric bracing on the belly, front and rear, also helped streamline and channel air to the prop. The addition of the fairing on the windshield also increased cruise and top speed, by kicking air over the top of the wing, instead of through me and the rear bulkhead. Never did get around to fairing the gear legs, but that would have also helped some. Went to sheet metal cap seal with the Ultrastar. Never put the fabric seal on the Firestar, but went straight to sheet metal. Always shrunk fabric on wings, tail, fuselage, control surfaces, extremely tight, to the point of deflecting aluminum as well as 4130 tubing. Topped this off with nice, slick two part polyurethane paint, Aerothane. Flew with a fixed pitch Jim Culver two blade wood prop, I think it was a 60X30 or 60 X32. This prop was dialed in perfectly for Firestar and 447. Would just bump the red line, WOT, straight and level flight. The 447, actually there were two, were kept built at all times. I always had a fresh engine on the bench to put on the airplane when the need arised, which was usually just prior to time to fly to an airshow or flyin somewhere. Both engines were cleaned up by Bobby Norwood, a noted Montgomery, Alabama, engine builder. Bobby would bore the cylinders, then match the ports to the steel liners. At the same time, he cleaned up the ports, not changing any dimensions, only increasing the ability for them to flow better. He also balanced piston assemblies. This little bit of balancing and cleaning up the intake and exhaust system, increased performance while reducing, significantly, engine vibration. There was always significant difference in weight between piston assemblies when obtaining parts for rebuild. If I had to do it all over again, and still fly and enjoy my Firestar the way I did, I would have built it aerobatically from the ground up. I did not find out until the end of the airplane, and nearly me, that I did not have nearly enough wing to be flying the way I was. It was the one area I did not worry about, but the area that reared up to bite me. I got rid of the Ken Brock Seat Tank during the 1988-89 rebuild. Replaced it with a light weight fiberglass jon boat seat, a gift from a local gentleman in Woodville, FL. > Enclosing the rear of my FireFly is a mod I am considering, along with > adding fiberglass seat and whatever cage mods it takes to accomplish > this.and then some sort of better wing gap cover...semi permenant...or > permenant...not just sure yet. I never found a reason to build a permanent gap seal to the fuselage. Jim welded a few 4130 tabs to the inboard ribs to attach a plain, flat, sheet metal gap seal. I found that the aluminum "valley" material I could obtain from the local hardware store held up better to the rigors of two stroke aviation much better than the one 2024 gap seal I built that cost me an arm and leg to buy the material. The stronger, harder 2024 was not nearly as stress resistant as the cheap "valley" material. Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Aaron Hollingsworth" <aaron(at)gamespeak.com>
Subject: Re: flooding
Date: Jan 30, 2004
Thanks for all the tips guys..... I feel like a dope now that I figured it out. It was not flooded at all. I guess it was the first time that 2-3 primes didn't actually get much gas to the engine. After changing plugs and thinking my plugs were wet (guess I didn't know how 'wet' a wet plug really looks) I tried and tried to get it started.. same result... spin spin not even a hint of kicking over.... After that I thought... hmm maybe the primer wasn't working... cranked it more while squirting primer... 2-3 more shots and it started up nice and easy. Sounded great, warmed up great... flew great. :/ I guess when it is a little warmer out the primer takes 2-3 before it gets the gas to the engine :/ What a dope, Aaron ----- Original Message ----- From: <GeoR38(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: flooding > > In a message dated 1/29/04 9:25:30 PM Eastern Standard Time, > edchmiel(at)mindspring.com writes: > > > Hi Aaron, > > > > Is there spark? Sounds like it's not even trying, did you get any > > indication it > > wanted to fire? Pull 1 plug from each cylinder, connect to the plug wire, > > crank the > > engine with the base of the plug in contact with the engine to create the > > ground path. > > Best done with as little light as possible, close the hangar door. Spark > > should be strong > > and blue. If not, suspect the ignition circuit. Good luck with it. > > > > Ed in JXN > > MkII/503 > > > and do NOT be satisfied with a white or yellow spark....it MUST Be Blue!!! > Don't ask how I know > > George Randolph > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Re: flooding
Date: Jan 30, 2004
There's no "dope" about it, if you can admit to a boo-boo, and maybe help someone else avoid the same mistake. Good on you ! ! ! Lar. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Building Kolb Mk III N78LB Vamoose www.gogittum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aaron Hollingsworth" <aaron(at)gamespeak.com> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: flooding > > Thanks for all the tips guys..... I feel like a dope now that I figured it > out. It was not flooded at all. I guess it was the first time that 2-3 > primes didn't actually get much gas to the engine. After changing plugs and > thinking my plugs were wet (guess I didn't know how 'wet' a wet plug really ________________________________________________________________________________
From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com
Date: Jan 31, 2004
Subject: Re: Starter on Rotax 503
Hello James, I am using the VLS system on my Firestar II, and the 503 engine. The Rotax starter attatched to the recoil starter will not fit behind the VLS box. I had planned on using the GPL starter but never got to it. I do know of two friends who are using the GPL starter and are very happy with its performance. I would definetly choose it on my Firestar because it is mounter from the side and not in front of the engine. MHO. Best regards, Johann G. Iceland. > > Listers, > > I'm trying to decide which starter to put on my FS. > > For those who have an electric start 503, what starter are you using? Any > experience with the Rotax starter used in connection with a canister type BRS > that's mounted on top of the wing in front of the engine? Does the starter > interfere with the placement of the BRS? > > What are your thoughts/reports on the GPL starter? > > As always, thanks for the suggestions and opinions. You always come through. > > James Tripp, FSII > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Olenik Aviation" <olenik-aviation(at)buyitsellitfixit.com>
Subject: Starter on Rotax 503
Date: Jan 31, 2004
If at all possible, use the Rotax starter over the GPL. I would rather go to the type E gearbox or keep using manual start than use a GPL starter. Cracked fan housing and crankcases is not uncommon with the GPL because they have absolutely no shock absorbtion to them when they engauge. The Rotax MAG end electric start has the starter motor mounted on a stack of o-rings and there is supposed to be a 1 mm gap between the starter motor and the housing it is attached to. This gap is taken up by one big o-ring. If you tighten down the starter motor so that there is no gap, the Rotax starter will also cause cracked castings. There needs to be something to isolate that starter motor from the fan housing or crankcase in the case of the 582. Tom Olenik Olenik Aviation - Supplying the lighter side of sport aviation. Level III Repair Station for Rotax Aircraft Engines Dealer for Summit Powered Parachutes http://www.buyitsellitfixit.com Toll Free: 877-AIR-MOTORS Buy from a dealer who can support what they sell...... -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of James and Cathy Tripp Subject: Kolb-List: Starter on Rotax 503 Listers, I'm trying to decide which starter to put on my FS. For those who have an electric start 503, what starter are you using? Any experience with the Rotax starter used in connection with a canister type BRS that's mounted on top of the wing in front of the engine? Does the starter interfere with the placement of the BRS? What are your thoughts/reports on the GPL starter? As always, thanks for the suggestions and opinions. You always come through. James Tripp, FSII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Firestar mods
Date: Jan 31, 2004
> John H...thx pard, about those 4130 struts....do you remember what size and > thickness they were...Wicks has several sizes...as well as aluminum struts > material also...I am going to change the Fly to a single lift strut for > sure. > > Ditto on the wing gap cover...boy..I wished I would have known what a hassle > they are without any tabs on the wing ribs to attach em to...thats one > little addition Ill never forget if I recover the wings..or build another > kolb. > Don Gherardini Don/All: 2.023 X .857 X .049 Was one of the first and significant modifications we did to the old Firestar. The old round aluminum struts constantly danced. That was the primary reason to change to steel. What a suprise on the first flight after installation of the 4130 streamlined struts. Nice solid struts. No vibration. First landing was an eye opener though. This was still in the days of no brakes, landing on my 600 foot grass strip. Glide improved a great deal. Was hard to get the Firestar down and stopped. Short field and no brakes was the primary reason for getting the nose up with longer gear legs. I wanted to turn up the bottom of the wings to assist slow down and stop on landing. Remember: No brakes! Going to 35" gear legs, shoved all the way in to the end of each gear leg socket was a big help slowing down after making a nice 3 point landing. Not to forget, it also helped get the Firestar off the ground quicker, by enabling it to rotate better. However, this was in contradiction to Homer's design plan of little airplanes for low time pilots. He kept his airplanes nearly level sitting on the landing gear. This was so the pilot would have to have sufficient airspeed to fly on take off, and keep up his airspeed on landing. Also made a more gentle ground handler out of them. With jury struts, one might be able to use smaller 4130 streamlined tubing. The Fire Fly has much shorter struts than the old Firestar, so going smaller would probably not be a problem. The main thing is to keep the strut in column during compression. Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 31, 2004
From: Bob Bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: pitch conversion
http://search.netscape.com/ns/boomframe.jsp?query=prop+pitch&page=1&offset=0&result_url=redir?src=websearch&requestId=7f402d08d41bc1bf&clickedItemRank=9&userQuery=prop+pitch&clickedItemURN=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.indoorduration.com%2Fpropcalc.asp&invocationType=-&fromPage=NSCPResults&remove_url=http://www.indoorduration.com/propcalc.asp <http://search.netscape.com/ns/boomframe.jsp?query=prop+pitch&page=1&offset=0&result_url=redir%3Fsrc%3Dwebsearch%26amp%3BrequestId%3D7f402d08d41bc1bf%26amp%3BclickedItemRank%3D9%26amp%3BuserQuery%3Dprop%2Bpitch%26amp%3BclickedItemURN%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.indoorduration.com%252Fpropcalc.asp%26amp%3BinvocationType%3D-%26amp%3BfromPage%3DNSCPResults&remove_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.indoorduration.com%2Fpropcalc.asp> Here's a dandy conversion tool, remember to divide your prop diameter by two. -and use the actual angle at the tip. -BB ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 31, 2004
Subject: [ Dennis Souder ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Dennis Souder Subject: Kolb Flyer with Homer and Dennis http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/flykolb@pa.net.01.31.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 31, 2004
Subject: [ Erich Weaver ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Erich Weaver Subject: Brace for Titan Exhaust System on Rotax 912 http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/Erich_Weaver@URSCorp.com.01.31.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 31, 2004
Subject: [ Paul Petty ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Paul Petty <ppetty@c-gate.net> Subject: Wing Mods http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/ppetty@c-gate.net.01.31.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 31, 2004
Subject: [ James A. Tripp ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: James A. Tripp Subject: FSII Building Progress http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/jtripp@elmore.rr.com.01.31.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Gps questions
Date: Jan 31, 2004
Hey Gang....I am haveing a hard time trying to figger out which GPS handhelds have the ability to use the aviation data base so you can just punch in the airport letter identifier...like OSH....or MTO...or what ever,, and it will find the location for you. I have been using a magellen meridan...which I like do to the large screen (for a hand held)...but it does not have this capability. A fella mentioned the Garmin GPS V the other day..and they seem reasonably priced...will they do this...I went to the Garmin website and it does not mention this....now I figgered that the Aviation GPS's they list will surely do this...but will any others? Now I know John H mentioned a garmin 196....hows the readability John?...the screen big enough to see ok? Don Gherardini FireFly 098 http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Virus
Date: Jan 31, 2004
You'll all want to make sure your virus protections are up to date. I got hit by the Novarg worm this evening, and am not sure where it came from. Norton did warn of its' presence, but was unable to quarantine it. I sent one List member a message saying I thought it was from him, but that was probably not the case.............just a co-incidence..........I think. It locked out my email, and Norton help & support was finally able to clean it out. Take care.................... Lar. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Building Kolb Mk III N78LB Vamoose www.gogittum.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dave Starbuck" <npd(at)maui.net>
Subject: UltraStar stolen on Maui
Date: Jan 31, 2004
This scratch-built UltraStar was stolen on Maui the 26th of January 04. It has a new 447 with a three blade Ivo prop. Please call 808 878 2469 with leads. Thanks, Dave ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "James, Ken" <KDJames(at)berkscareer.com>
Subject: BMW
Date: Feb 01, 2004
I'm looking at this engine on E-Bay Any thoughts from the group _ I want to power a MK III Extra Description BMW R100 aircraft engine with true dual CDI ignition, electric start, 2.58:1 belt reduction drive, 2 Bing 54 carburetors. 75 Horsepower @ 6400 RPM. weighs 118 lbs. Previously on gyrocopter. New internal components. Total of 5 hours running time. Ken BMW I'm looking at this engine on E-Bay Any thoughts from the group _ I want to power a MK III Extra Description BMW R100 aircraft engine with true dual CDI ignition, electric start, 2.58:1 belt reduction drive, 2 Bing 54 carburetors. 75 Horsepower @ 6400 RPM. weighs 118 lbs. Previously on gyrocopter. New internal components. Total of 5 hours running time. Ken ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Thom Riddle" <jtriddle(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: Wellsville ...
Date: Feb 01, 2004
Tim and all, Indeed there is plenty of length at Wellsville. My concern was if it is soggy like I hear it was last year, then I can't land there and will have to use a paved runway, 'cuz Tundra tires won't fit inside my wheelpants :-) nor do they fit my flying partners' idea of a sleek "fast" aeroplane. If it is dry then absolutely no problem at all. Thom in Buffalo ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Thom Riddle" <jtriddle(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Kolbra Wt. & Balance
Date: Feb 01, 2004
I am looking for a 2-seat TANDEM trainer to teach my son-in-law to fly in and need to know wt. & balance data for Kolbras with the heavy engines such as the 912. If anyone has a spreadsheet with their particular information I would appreciate getting a copy of it. If not in a spreadsheet format, that is okay...just need the datum locations of front and back seats, fuel, main gear, tail gear wts. and datum locations. I can forsee a situation where a heavy instructor(me) in the back with a light weight student in the front exceeding the aft CG limit. Thanks for your input. Thom in Buffalo ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Clay Stuart" <tcstuart(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: wing mods
Date: Feb 01, 2004
Dear Paul Petty, John Hauck and others, Paul, nice work on the wings. What is the rationale for the added angle on the ribs? What type aluminum and thickness was used for the 3/4 and 1/2" angle? I don't plan to fold my wings, but my Xtra will probably be heavy, so I may need the mods too. Thanks, Clay Stuart building Xtra Danville KY ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 01, 2004
Subject: [ Dave Starbuck ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Dave Starbuck Subject: Stolen UltraStar http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/npd@maui.net.02.01.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 01, 2004
Subject: [ David Starbuck ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: David Starbuck <ds@np-designcenter.com> Subject: Decisions, decisions... http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/ds@np-designcenter.com.02.01.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: BMW
Date: Feb 01, 2004
The reduction ratio looks allot higher than 2.58 to one, closer to 4 to one with that double reduction. First question would be why so much reduction with a gyro copter? Why would they sell it so quick? The double reduction seems to be prone to problems and weight. The thrust line would be kind of high for a kolb with the double reduction. If you are really considering a BMW why not go with a German conversion that is being offered with a larger CC engine, gear reduction and a clutch? Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIc ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eugene Zimmerman" <eugenezimmerman(at)dejazzd.com> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: BMW > > Looks like an interesting project to experiment with. > I would question the weight. The belt reduction looks a bit wimpy for > 75HP to me in the pictures. It would be helpful if there were more > picts from different angles. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Ebay BMW
From: Jim Gerken <gerken(at)us.ibm.com>
Date: Feb 02, 2004
02/02/2004 08:26:41 AM I looked at the Ebay listing for the BMW engine, currently at $1250. Here are a few observations: >It is single reduction. The other black thing is just the front of the engine I believe. It appears to be a multi-v, not a toothed-belt type. I would think that transmitting 65 Hp thru this would lead to often tightening and frequent replacement. My opinion. It does have a very high thrustline. >What year is it? There would be no traceability to the original motorcycle, to gauge the TT. "New Internal Components" could be anything. >Bing 54 carbs are slide type, not the CV carbs the engine originally ran with on the motorcycle. You are on your own for tuning. >75 HP @ 6400 rpm is a bit optimistic. >118 lbs cannot be correct. My 582 complete wet was 128, and the wife and I could just lift it off the MKiii when I sold it. We could NOT lift the BWM block back up there (not including carbs and exhaust and any ignition and no oil). >Exhaust system shown is not balanced, and ends without any muffler. I would toss it. My experiments showed a couple of HP available in the exhaust tuning. Proper power balance demands equal exhaust headers, even if not tuned. Bottom line: I spent $1100 for a low time (12000 miles) 1991 R100, all stock, hadn't been messed with. About a $1000 seems to be the norm for a crashed bike, which gets you everything you need, and then since it is a titled vehicle you get some traceability. I would judge this Ebay to be worth less due to its unknown age and wear. It could have been pieced together from parts. The stuff that is missing could easily exceed the cost of the engine. Mine did not include a reduction drive, but the "C" gearbox is the slick way to go anyway. Thrustline with "C" box is about an inch different than the 582 was (depending on your mount plate and oil pan combinations, could be an inch lower, could be an inch higher) . My bid is $700. If you are serious about the engine, perhaps a little research can clear up some of these issues, and maybe add a bit of value. I agree with Don though, that ugly blue color has to go. My 2 cents worth... Jim Gerken ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: BMW on E-bay
Date: Feb 02, 2004
From: "Jason Omelchuck" <jason(at)acuityinc.com>
It would appear that this engine has been modified to be in the tractor (not pusher) position. On a regular BMW engine the exhaust is pointing forward and the transmission is pointing and carbs are at the rear. There is a conversion that can be done to put the cylinders on the opposite sides and then a new cam is installed, it looks like this engine has had this done. I believe the exhaust should be on the forward side for cooling reasons. This keeps the hot side of the cylinders into the wind and the cold side down wind. Jason MKIII with BMW R100 (unfinished) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "James, Ken" <KDJames(at)berkscareer.com>
Subject: BMW
Date: Feb 02, 2004
I asked the owner if it was a new engine modded to aircraft use or a used bike engine. He said it was a used bike engine with new internals ( what ever that means). I don't know enough yet about BMW conversions yet to make a bid so if anyone wants it I'm out of the race. Ken I would also appreciate input pro/con from the list. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "James, Ken" <KDJames(at)berkscareer.com>
Subject: BMW on E-bay
Date: Feb 02, 2004
Can you guys recommend conversion sites or where to by a converted engine? Yes I know I can goggle it but if you are already working with a dealer or a conversion site your insights about problems you have faced would be better than cold calling. Ken -----Original Message----- From: Jason Omelchuck [mailto:jason(at)acuityinc.com] Subject: Kolb-List: BMW on E-bay It would appear that this engine has been modified to be in the tractor (not pusher) position. On a regular BMW engine the exhaust is pointing forward and the transmission is pointing and carbs are at the rear. There is a conversion that can be done to put the cylinders on the opposite sides and then a new cam is installed, it looks like this engine has had this done. I believe the exhaust should be on the forward side for cooling reasons. This keeps the hot side of the cylinders into the wind and the cold side down wind. Jason MKIII with BMW R100 (unfinished) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 02, 2004
Subject: BMW engine on a trike
From: ul15rhb(at)juno.com
A friend sent me this website. While on the topic of BMW engines, I thought it might be interesting. http://community-2.webtv.net/rwflyer/LibertyTrike/ Ralph ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Olenik Aviation" <olenik-aviation(at)buyitsellitfixit.com>
"Powerchutes(at)Yahoogroups. Com" , "Engines-Ul(at)Yahoogroups. Com" , "FlyChallenger"
Subject: sending e-mail to Olenik Aviation
Date: Feb 02, 2004
Hi guys, I just talked to someone who said he had been e-mailing me several times with no response. It turns out he was using the wrong e-mail address. I use a specific e-mail address just for message groups. In addition to the hundred or so e-mails per day I get from those groups, I get maybe three times that on that same address that is nothing but junk. So if the subject line does not have the pre-fix from one of the message groups I supscribe to, it automaticly gets the delete key and will often get the delete key even with the prefix if the subject does not get my attention. This e-mail address that I use for message groups is not advertised anywhere. To e-mail us directly, use the e-mail address that we advertise on our website, in magazines and everytwhere: olenik(at)buyitsellitfixit.com Notice, I've had to add the message below to my signature as well. So I'm sorry if anyone has tried to contact me and got no response.... you were just using the wrong e-mail address. It makes me wonder how many others are doing this and why I'm sending this message. I can't use one e-mail address because then my important e-mails that are sent to me directly would get lost among hundreds of junk ones. Tom Olenik Olenik Aviation - Supplying the lighter side of sport aviation. Level III Repair Station for Rotax Aircraft Engines Dealer for Summit Powered Parachutes http://www.buyitsellitfixit.com Toll Free: 877-AIR-MOTORS Buy from a dealer who can support what they sell...... (DO NOT USE THIS E-MAIL ADDRESS FOR DIRECT E-MAIL. WE WILL NEVER SEE IT. USE THE ABOVE CONTACT INFORMATION TO CONTACT US DIRECTLY) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Oshkosh 2004
Date: Feb 02, 2004
Scott I keep forgetting to answer you kind offer. I had a super time last year in god's country and flying with you to Oshkosh. I'm honored to have you offer a stop over at your place again. It was super flying in a flight of five into Oshkosh and it would be nice to have at least that many this year. It appears the Johns will be in Alaska instead of Oshkosh. How about Bill Vincent and the rest of Iron Mountain group, are you guys interested in flying along??? Maybe we can talk Uncle Craig and some others in meeting at Iron Mountain or some other place for a mass Kolb flight into Oshkosh. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIc ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Trask" <sctrask(at)diisd.org> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: NE Kolb Homecoming > > on 1/26/04 3:34 PM, Richard & Martha Neilsen at NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net wrote: > > > > > > > This sounds interesting but around July 4th isn't good for me and near the > > end of July I will be heading for Oshkosh. Which brings to mind an earlier > > post of mine about getting a group to fly into Oshkosh this year. Anyone > > interested??? > > > > Rick Neilsen > > Redrive VW powered MKIIIc > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Linda Rowe" <rowedl(at)highstream.net> > > To: > > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: NE Kolb Homecoming > > > Hi Rick and list > I'll be planning on flying in again into OSH this year. It will be my 12th > year on flying in. You're more than welcome to stop here again and fly in > with me. Rick, I'll even cut a few more tree limbs off for you. John W. I'll > cut some more ferns at the end of the runway for you. Those Alaskan > travelers could swing in on their way back from Alaska (with whale blubber > on their breaths). There's always fresh venison here in the U.P. ( NOT > freezer burned, John H.). I do realize that it would be a little far north > for you guys coming from Alaska, but know that you are welcome. > The Homecoming gathering would be nice. As long as the group doesn't stay > too long. I would think everyone could meet someplace else and everybody > could fly in together, if this wasn't already thought of. > You guys in the N.E. should gather at the week-long Yankee fly-in in July. > I haven't gone in 3 years. We were attending every year prior to that. It's > a great time! > > Scott Trask IMT > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Re: Bi-focals
Date: Feb 02, 2004
Huh ?? 'D I come on too strong ?? Again ?? :-) Do not Archive. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Building Kolb Mk III N78LB Vamoose www.gogittum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "ronnie wehba" <rwehba(at)wtxs.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Bi-focals > > WOW, Larry, sure glad you are happy now!!,ron in tx. later cold and windy > here, > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com> > To: > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Bi-focals > > > > > > You young, clear-eyed whippersnappers can hit "delete" right now. > > I changed the subject line, too. > > > > I bin called stiff-necked more'n once, too, but I think it was related > more > > to my nickname of Stub-Bourne than ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob" <rcarillon(at)neo.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Gps questions
Date: Feb 02, 2004
Sorry, My email was in response to Dons question on which GPS has the aviation database. Not Tom. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net> Subject: Kolb-List: Gps questions > > Hey Gang....I am haveing a hard time trying to figger out which GPS > handhelds have the ability to use the aviation data base so you can just > punch in the airport letter identifier...like OSH....or MTO...or what ever,, > and it will find the location for you. I have been using a magellen > meridan...which I like do to the large screen (for a hand held)...but it > does not have this capability. > > A fella mentioned the Garmin GPS V the other day..and they seem reasonably > priced...will they do this...I went to the Garmin website and it does not > mention this....now I figgered that the Aviation GPS's they list will surely > do this...but will any others? > > Now I know John H mentioned a garmin 196....hows the readability John?...the > screen big enough to see ok? > > Don Gherardini > FireFly 098 > http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Airgriff2(at)aol.com
Date: Feb 03, 2004
Subject: Wellsville PA fly-in
A group is flight planning our trip to Wellsville and I thought I would mention our stops along the way to see if anyone on the list was familiar with them as far as being a good place to stop. They are all listed as having fuel availiable. Our stops ,heading south from the Albany NY area are,: Wurtsboro (N82) - Stroudsburg (N53)- Slatington (69N)- Smoketown (Q08) and then into Shreveport North (62PA) Thanks Fly Safe Bob Griffin ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: BMW dealers ?
From: Jim Gerken <gerken(at)us.ibm.com>
Date: Feb 03, 2004
02/03/2004 08:47:58 AM > >From: "James, Ken" <KDJames(at)berkscareer.com> >Subject: RE: Kolb-List: BMW on E-bay >Can you guys recommend conversion sites or where to by a converted engine? >Yes I know I can goggle it but if you are already working with a dealer or a >conversion site your insights about problems you have faced would be better >than cold calling. >Ken Sorry Ken, I can't give you any dealers names. There's one place called Airdale I think : http://www.airdale.com/bmw_engines.htm but the last time I called there (6 months ago), they were moving toward the BMW 1150 engine and moving away from the R100 series. The 1150 is a neat package but I deemed it too heavy. It is injected, uses a computer of sorts, is a bit bigger and weighs around 20-25 MORE pounds than the R100 (1000 CC). The power output is more, I think around 80 HP, on the 1150, but weight is weight, and enough power is enough. Diminishing returns, etc. Airdale was selling gearbox adaptor plates to mate the R100 to the Rotax "C" box for a company from South Africa (always scary to deal with S. Africa), but that company was moving away from this market also and was making adaptors only to-order, unsure of delivery time. The last time I called Airdale, they had one complete engine with gearbox for sale. The price at that time was around 3500. It had come from Europe. I understand that someone in Europe has made a casting mold for the adaptor plate. I saw a photo of one somewhere but cannot find it now. That would be a nice way to go, if you could find it. It looked great, with cast-in ribs and features. A site for photos of installations in England is: http://www.bmw.flyer.co.uk/index.htm To get into the info loop, you need to find a way to converse with the flyers from England. My understanding is that there are hundreds of these R100 conversions flying in England/Europe. The bikes are more available there. Here in the U.S., everything has become collectable if it is a bit dusty, so nothing depreciates. We depend on wrecks instead. Maybe our very own Hans VanAlphen will post a link to his site showing his conversion, which I am following with close attention to do my own. Hans had some parts made, and has tried a number of combinations, as you probably remember reading on this List. Jason has discovered his local VoTech as a valuable machining resource for some of these parts. And I have scratched them out myself so far, learning from Hans and Jason, and a bit of trial and error (and some luck). I have done some experimentation with exhausts and timing, and carb jetting, updated to Bings latest float design for these CV carbs (see http://www.bingcarburetor.com/bmw/cvaccessories.html ). Eventually I will get some stuff written up summarizing my setup. I have kept good notes. Good luck, Jim Gerken 1991 R100 almost ready to fly on 1997 MKiii, formerly powered by 582 Rotax ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 03, 2004
From: Terry <tkrolfe(at)usadatanet.net>
Subject: Re: Wellsville PA fly-in
Airgriff2(at)aol.com wrote: > > A group is flight planning our trip to Wellsville and I thought I would > mention our stops along the way to see if anyone on the list was familiar with them > as far as being a good place to stop. They are all listed as having fuel > availiable. Our stops ,heading south from the Albany NY area are,: > Wurtsboro (N82) - Stroudsburg (N53)- Slatington (69N)- Smoketown (Q08) > and then into Shreveport North (62PA) > Thanks > Fly Safe > Bob Griffin > Bob, Can attest to the fact that Smoketown (Q08) is a good stop. Very friendly people there and with several UL's based there. Fuel, food and lodging available! Would be a couple of us willing to meet up with you there for the leg to Wellsville. Terry - FireFly #95 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Judy or Larry Gitt" <gittj(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: GPS in largement of screen
Date: Feb 03, 2004
How about a Magnifying glass out in front of GPS that folds out of the way to inlarge the screen. To help us old time out to see . Give you guys somthang to think about LarryG ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: BMW dealers ?
Date: Feb 03, 2004
I found this site a few years ago when I was considering ALL engine options. http://www.microlightsport.co.uk/Catalogue/New/bmwengine.htm They offer this engine in 80, 90 , and 100HP versions and has a reduction drive designed for these BMW engines. The prices were reasonable at the time. The only concern and deciding factor for me was the 6200 to 7500 RPMs necessary to produce the rated power. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIc ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Gerken" <gerken(at)us.ibm.com> Subject: Kolb-List: BMW dealers ? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Judy or Larry Gitt" <gittj(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Engine of with two differnt HP
Date: Feb 03, 2004
Hirth has Engine 3701 Witch i seen at Oshkosh, the last two year But there was only two in the USA . for 140 LB wet with all the equipment looks good to me .May some of you guys seen it http://www.recpower.com/3701.htm It might be worth a try larry G ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Airplast, does that look a lot like the Top Flight power point
tips and the mods you guys tried?
From: Jim Gerken <gerken(at)us.ibm.com>
Date: Feb 03, 2004
02/03/2004 02:36:25 PM http://www.cavediver.com/texas-flyer/Rossi/default.htm I followed the above link to Robert Laird's page, describing his Trike experience, and followed the "prop" link to view that beautiful red Airplast prop. Does it look like the Airplast design is what the Top Flight Power point tips look like? And the same mods that a couple of you guys made recently? I know the Airplast props are supposed to be very smooth and quiet. Jim Gerken ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 03, 2004
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: What's Status on Prop Tip Mod
Any one else modify their prop tips to resemble those on a Top Flite RC model prop? Interested to hear what the results were. jerb http://www.top-flite.com/accys/topq5000.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Petty" <Lynnp@c-gate.net>
Subject: wing mods
Date: Feb 03, 2004
Mike,Clay,all, Sorry for the delay but I have been at Ronnie Smith's for the past 4 days attending a Rotax engine school.The wing mods were a suggestion from John Hauck. His brother, Jim, I believe, designed the mod as well as a lot of the design changes on Kolb aircraft over the past 15 years or so. The angle mod made the wing incredibly strong and is a worthwhile investment compared to the weight gain, which is not very much. I have some digital scales and will weigh the total number of pieces for one wing and post this evening. If this mod had not been designed by someone way smarter than myself, and proven for some 15 years now, I would have not even considered it. But with some 1500+ hours and through some really ruff conditions, I chose to go the extra mile. The angle is .063" thick and is 6063 T-52 sharp corner and available @ http://www.nolansupply.com/bysubcategory.asp?categoryMetals&supercategoryAluminum&subcategoryAluminum+Angle+%2D+6063%2DT52+%2D+Sharp+Corner&typeFalse&specsTrue The rivet pattern gets a little tricky and I had to pick Haucks brain a bit to get it right. Perhaps John or Jim can explain what this mod will do. I sure cant, just trusted them on this.Please correct me John if any of the above statements are incorrect. I'm calling all of this from memory which is about wiped out at this time from the 3 days of intense schooling. The school... WOW I must say that anyone that plans to turn a wrench or do any maintenance on their Rotax engine, be it 2 or 4 cycle, go and take this training. I had forgot about the class and let it slip up on me after the 2 cycle was almost over. So the 4 cycle was all I was able to get in and the next 2 cycle class will be a year, maybe sooner I hope. Eric Tucker is a great instructor and the classes is very small and personal.Right off the bat I knew the class was going to be interesting because when asked "How long do you think Rotax has been around?" and many saying 20/30 years? Turns out Rotax has been around since the 1920's!!! They started out inventing the coast-a-brake for bicycles. The Rotax name comes from "Rotating Axle" aint that neat? The 912 series engines are a pure work of art. Things like 1 thousands clearance piston to cylinder wall. Zero wear in cylinders @ TBO! One of the biggest discoveries was how fast the tiny power plant can recirculate it's 3 liters of engine oil. Cant remember the exact flow rate but a 912 will puke all 3 liters in like 10 seconds if an oil line blows off!!! Another was how the connecting rods do not have rod caps. Nope! The crank is a pressed together assembly from the factory just like a Harley Davidson engine. I have plans of becoming a Rotax repair station and are just breaking the surface. However there were several folks there just learning proper maintenance. And believe me there is plenty of that to be done. Well worth the cost and time. We had a gent from as far away as Alaska! It is easy to see why these engines are as expensive as they are. I am surprised that they are not more expensive than they are.The 912UL series engines are the same engines as the FAA 912 certified engines with component replacement parts and time required replacement being the only difference.There are 912UL engines out there running with over 3000 hours on them. With constant R&D and good service bulletins to keep them all up to date with the latest data I cant think of a better engine for my airplane. Speaking of which, If any of you are planning on buying a Rotax engine soon, do it real soon! They expect a 18% price increase in the near future. Parts prices.... Anyone ever had to purchase any major components or parts? Cylinder head for a 912 $1000.00 dollars debit card Rocker arms $200.00 EACH debit card Crank assembly $3000.00 debit card Frequent oil changes.....priceless........ Not to knock anyone wanting to power a Kolb aircraft with any other power plant. I say GO FOR IT !! Heck I still want to fly the Harley Davidson engine. However, after the school and learning how well built these tiny short stroke 4 cycle engines are,and how well these engines are produced and constantly evaluated and updated, I have no doubt I have purchased the best (proven) aircraft engine on the market. Now I'm going to head to the hanger and give my engine a good looking over. I will weigh the mod parts and post later. For what it's worth it took me an hour to type this friggen post !!!!! Sorry to be so long winded folks but hey it's been four days!!!!!! Paul Petty Building Ms. Dixie Kolbra/912UL/Warp ________________________________________________________________________________
From: SR3SA2L1(at)aol.com
Date: Feb 03, 2004
Subject: Firestar For Sale
FIRESTAR FOR SALE: I'm moving out of country and can't take it with me. Includes original builders plans and builders manual. AIRFRAME/WINGS: Always hangered since new Never in bad or wet weather 60 HR Total Time on airframe New yellow, red and white paint New ceconite fabric with silver base and Randolph aviation dope paint (0 time in air) Framed and removable rear doors/enclosure Tilting nose for easy entrance Original and custom adj. hard seat 8 adj. inflatable lumbar/seat support bladders All new cables and hardware In cockpit metal covers for cables Metal floors Multiple windshields with quick change Multiple wing gap/leading edges Extra frame bracing for heavier engine Extra wing/frame bracing Wing tip brace kit from Kolb installed Removable rear firewall 5 point seat belts Second Chance softpack rocket deployed parachute LANDING GEAR: Original gear legs, wheels and tires Firestar 2 legs, larger wheels and tires Brake system has dual, right and left control handles New cables (no brakes inside wheels yet) ENGINE: New 503 DCDI with 1 hour (break-in time only, not flown) New "B" drive Air Drive Service electric starter New In-flight adjustable carbs Cermachromed exhaust Shaft balancer Choke Primer New Duel mag key start PROP: New 3 blade Ivo prop (1 hour only during engine break-in) In-flight adjustable Yellow blades match paint scheme Metal leading edge tape Metal spinner Prop balancer FUEL SYSTEM: Custom 11+ gal alum. fuel tank Easy fill system Flow stop to prevent fuel loss if fuel cap came off in flight Multi fuel outlets Dual vents Large access door Sight gauge Original tank (in case you want to put it back in) Pulse pump 3 Electric back-up pumps (1 set up for emergency reserve fuel tank) Separate fuel line for each pump Multi fuel filter system for each pump and fuel line Pressure regulator Multi fuel line system for automatic fuel back-up delivery INSTRUMENTS: Hobbs Quad - (duel EGTs, CHTs) Tach Duel - (volt/amp) Air speed Sensitive altimeter "G" meter Ball variometer Wiskey barrel compose Slip ind. Scanner (200 channel programmable) Loran KX99 (VHF, CDI, VOR, etc) PTT Air Repeater AM/FM/CASS with ext speakers, headset jack CB with ext speakers, headset jack PA Multi timer/clock FM transceivers (2) Fire ext. Solar batt charger Multi 12V access/cig outlets Cockpit lighting Military helmets/headsets (2) with drop down faceshields Helmet with AVCom headset Access switch boxes (2) HISTORY: I purchased this already built in 1991 from a local pilot who had purchased it new and built it. He was selling because he bought a GA airplane (he liked to do aerobatics). He put 10 hours on it before he sold it to me. It had the wood prop and a 377 on it at the time. I flew it for 50 hours over the next few years before I bought a PA-28-180 to use for a long commute I was making at the time. I really like the Kolb and decided in 1995 that I would do a complete teardown, repaint it and equip it better and make it more adequate for the type of flying I was doing (I figured since I had another plane to fly while I was doing this and plenty of space in the hanger, I could take all the time I wanted, make all the upgrades I wanted and still fly all I wanted in the other plane). A bunch of other projects got in the way and the Firestar took a back seat to higher priorities. Mission creep happened - a lot. New 503, prop, fabric and paint scheme etc., etc., etc. Now the only original instrument left is the airspeed indicator and just about everything else is new. There are still a few things left to be done before it is ready to go back in the air (put the wing gap on, finish the wiring for strobes and radios (instruments are done) and about a week worth of misc. work (depending on which options you want in it when you fly). It's never been crashed or abused. It has never been left outside or been flown in inclement weather. It has been in our desert weather since new. I am now planning a move out of country and it can't go with me or I would never sell it. I will send pictures upon request (as soon as it stops raining here I will take some and send them via email - I don't want to take it out of the garage and get it wet. It is supposed to clear up here in the next few days). It is in central Calif. I also have a duel axle boat trailer I was converting to a flat bed to haul it that I can sell with it (if I get time to finish it, you can use it to haul it home or you can use your own trailer) and a SkyOx 4 place auto alt comp O2 system if you like to fly high. I have over $17K in it and have less than a year to sell it - make offer. I can be reached at: Steve (209) - 669 - 9448 SR3SA2L1(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 04, 2004
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Balance Master
Anybody have any experience with using a Balance Master dynamic balancer on the crank of a Rotax? Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 04, 2004
From: Terry <tkrolfe(at)usadatanet.net>
Subject: Re: Balance Master
Richard Pike wrote: > > Anybody have any experience with using a Balance Master dynamic balancer on > the crank of a Rotax? > > Richard Pike > MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > > Richard, Put one on my 447 on my FireFly last year. Didn't notice any big improvement, but I fell it's more smooth than before. That's a subjective analysis having no instrumentation to verify. Did so after reading that Rotax was including this feature on some of their engines. I now have one on the prop and the one on the magneto end as well. Works for me! Terry - FireFly #95 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 04, 2004
From: Terry <tkrolfe(at)usadatanet.net>
Subject: Northeast Fly-in
I talked to Homer this morning about being able to have a fly-in at his farm on Fathers Day. Told him that a bunch of Kolbers would like to fly in and pay their respects. He said that he though that would be a neat thing to have happen and that he doesn't have anything scheduled for that day. I also asked that if the weather looks bad for that day if we could do it that Saturday instead. He said that would be OK also. He would love to meet you guys and see your planes. I discussed landing and takeoff protocol and he mentioned the church at the west end of his runway. We can get into more of that as we get closer to that time. I'm also getting in touch with the Mason- Dixon UL Club to see what their schedule is for the fly-in at Wellsville. I know they have planned events each day and we would need to schedule our arrivals around those. Also will find out if they are still observing a left hand right hand pattern. Again more later when these are known. Just wanted you all to know that it looks like we have an event in the makings. As I learn more I will keep you posted. Terry - FireFly #95 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 04, 2004
From: "Bob N." <ronoy(at)shentel.net>
Subject: Re: mod weight
Maybe he's gonna put the mod on Both wings! Bob N. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 04, 2004
From: Earl & Mim Zimmerman <emzi(at)supernet.com>
Subject: Re: Balance Master
Richard Pike wrote: > > Anybody have any experience with using a Balance Master dynamic balancer on > the crank of a Rotax? Richard, If you have a newer 582 it may already have one installed from rotax. If you look on the parts breakdown for the magneto it is Ref.#16 part # 965-497. -- Earl ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Christopher Armstrong" <tophera(at)centurytel.net>
Subject: mod weight
Date: Feb 04, 2004
I don't think that the mod you made was an efficient structural addition. What was the point of the addition? To stiffen the ribs front to rear? To increase the bending strength of the rib chordwise? You have added 6 pounds of aluminum angle and a 1/4 pound or so of rivets that are very ineffective at strengthening in the directions that the ribs carry loads in your wing while putting a bunch of holes in you rib tubing weakening it. To strengthen the structure efficiently you need to add the material exactly where it is needed and carry that new load path from the source load all the way back to the wing hard points. I think it is possible that this mod has weakened the structure in someways more then it strengthened it in others. Your statement that it is only the weight of a gallon of gas is also confusing. This is 10 percent of your fuel load, 10 percent of your range, or a reduction in your rate of climb, longer takeoff and landings and a small increase in stall speed. Not completely insignificant, especially if you hit a tree on takeoff someday cause you are 6 pounds heavyer! Kolbs flown responsibly don't have any significant history of structural problems. What are you trying to improve on? If it ain't broke don't fix it. Just wondering Topher ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 05, 2004
From: Earl & Mim Zimmerman <emzi(at)supernet.com>
Subject: Re: Balance Master
Richard Pike wrote: > > It does. I was hoping to learn about one that actually did something about > the vibration. My 532 didn't have one, & it was much smoother... > > Richard Pike > MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) That's interesting! Maybe I should take mine off??? I bought a balance master for the prop.too, but didn't get to try it out yet. -- Earl ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Petty" <lynnp@c-gate.net>
Subject: from class
Date: Feb 05, 2004
Kolbers, An interesting note from the Rotax class that came to mind that I thought I would share with those of you that are powered by the 912 series engine is that the engines oiling system pumps the oil through the engine at a rate of 15 gpm. With a capacity of only 3 quarts, it can puke it's entire oil supply in 10 to 15 seconds!!! This means by the time your EIS or gauge indicates a loss of oil pressure, your engine is toast! Another interesting note applies to the NPRM sport pilot rule. One catch to the new rule that is not mentioned is that if a pilot fails a medical, he or she will not be able to fly under the new rule. If you fail a medical your done. If you do however let your current medical expire then you can fly under the new rule. If you fail a medical you will have then pass a medical and then let it expire to go SP. Take Care... pp ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: mod weight
Date: Feb 05, 2004
Hi Gang: I don't, take credit for the rib mod. Seems the rib mod, using 1/2" and 3/4" aluminum angle to beef up outboard ribs, was developed by Old Kolb Company, either Homer Kolb or Dennis Souder, or both. I took that mod a little further to increase rib strength on my MK III, which was being built to fly and survive daily in an environment most Kolbs never see in their lifetime. Yes, the mod greatly strenthens the rib, especially the nose, which carries the greatest load in the Kolb wing. Even responsible pilots can get into situations the airplane was not designed to operate in. If you have not been there, you probably will not understand. I have a feeling Paul's Kolbra is going to be one of those Kolbs that will fly in places where it could use that extra strength/insurance to get there and get home. I seriously doubt the extra weight of the rib mod is going to make the difference of "hitting the tree on take off" or not. Hitting trees on takeoff has not been a problem with Kolbs, unless they lose the engine.............. Wish I had had those aluminum angles on my old Firestar. :-) Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Wing Mod Weights
Date: Feb 05, 2004
Hi Gng: I don't take credit for the rib mod. Seems the rib mod, using 1/2" and 3/4" aluminum angle to beef up outboard ribs, was developed by Old Kolb Company, either Homer Kolb or Dennis Souder, or both. I took that mod a little further to increase rib strength on my MK III, which was being built to fly and survive daily in an environment most Kolbs never see in their lifetime. Yes, the mod greatly strenthens the rib, especially the nose, which carries the greatest load in the Kolb wing. Even responsible pilots can get into situations the airplane was not designed to operate in. If you have not been there, you probably will not understand. I have a feeling Paul's Kolbra is going to be one of those Kolbs that will fly in places where it could use that extra strength/insurance to get there and get home. I seriously doubt the extra weight of the rib mod is going to make the difference of "hitting the tree on take off" or not. Hitting trees on takeoff has not been a problem with Kolbs, unless they lose the engine.............. Wish I had had those aluminum angles on my old Firestar. :-) Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Balance Master
Date: Feb 05, 2004
> Maybe the 582 would get smoother on something better than 87 octane? > > Richard Pike Richard/Gang: Only if it is detonating on 87. You haven't increased compression or advanced the timing, have you? No matter what, if it makes you feel better, do it. :-) john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: mod weight
Date: Feb 05, 2004
HIya Gang.....that rob mod that Paul did...it is described zactly the same in my FireFly Builders manual...and required on the outboard ribs. The Logic certainly makes sense to me, and although not mentioned in the plans...I bet is serves 2 problems that could occour. 1st is the known aileron flutter occurance... Control surface flutter is as often not induced by a occilating flex between the control surface and the attachment structure.(not just the air passing to fast over both). If you build a Kolb wing, as you are finished but just before you add the prescribed angles, you can lift the trailing edge at the tip very slightly..or anywhere around the bow, and it will rise up before the spar begins to rise....I measured the "flex" in my wing before the addition of the angles and it was 3/8 of an inch on the trailing edge...and slightly more at the center of the bow tip. As I have been exposed to control surface flutter twice previously in my life...this disturbed me greatly..(read that as scared the living chit outta me)...Not in a Kolb...but even after 20 years...everytime a rudder or an aileron bounces in a thermal....I get the puckers.... So after installing the prescribed angles....this flex was reduced...not completely...but significantly... After myself and 2 of my A&P friends were standing around this structure on my bench...the general opinion was another rib was needed between the Bow area ...which was a greater span than the ribs spacing. So I added a rib...and a tad more bow stiffining structure. The goal was to get the wing to be able to be lifted at the trailing edge, and at the bow...with no flex. we accomplished that. This also preserved the airfoil profile out a little further towards the tip..with the resulting taper that is so common to a Kolb wing reduced. I might add that the 2 compadres of mine...both fellow college buds from Spartan, have been in the AC industry since we got out of school. 1 went to work at McDonnel-Douglas...and spent 10 years building F-4s.then on to the american airlines airframe overhaul center in Tulsa...and the other went to work for Fairchild building Metroliners till the plant closed. These 2 fellas know more about control surface building and rigging than I can ever hope to...so their advice was heeded...I should give some credit here...Cheif Bob( I still call the old F-4 Crew Cheif that) is the Metroliner man...and he insisted that He be here when the controls were rigged...even tho he lives several hundred miles away...he made me promise to let him do it. Well he has never rigged a Kolb...but he came up and told me to sit my but down over there and watch, and he did it. When I flew the first flight...no trim was needed, and no adjustments..it flew straight as a string! .Then there was that other fella who wore out a firestar...and explained to me just how the wing failed...I paid alot of attention to him also. I think they all would approve of your wing Paul. Don Gherardini Sales / Engineering dept. American Honda Engines Power Equipment Company CortLand, Illinois 800-626-7326 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: mod weight
Date: Feb 05, 2004
> 1st is the known aileron flutter occurance... > Don Gherardini Don/Gang: The only requirement to eliminate aileron flutter or prevent it from happening in the first place, is to install the aileron counterbalance weights designed by old Kolb, after they finally decided that I was not lying for six years about aileron flutter experienced on a regular basis in my Ultrastar and Firestar. When Dick Rahill got the crap scared out of him during Sun and fun, probably 1993 or 1994, aileron counterbalance weights were designed and produced for the Firestar initially, but not the MK III. I installed a pair of Firestar weights on my MKIII (all available at the time) and flew with them until 2001 when I rebuilt the left wing and changed up to MKIII weights. I had designed and installed aileron counterbalance weights on my MK III during initial build based on flutter problems with my FS and US. My weights did not work and only agrevated aileron flutter. I made one short flight and removed them. :-) I have never encountered elevator or rudder flutter. However, some Kolb rudders will start an occilation that could get into flutter if ignored. The cure for rudder flutter is a counterbalance weight similar to Richard Pike's fix, or keep your feet on the rudder pedals. Could be an easy enough fix if planned for during construction. The outboard trailing edge corner is fine the way it is built, according to plans. Early on I thought it should be stiffened up. Have since changed my mind based on thousands of hours flown in all kinds of weather without an inkling of aileron flutter. Rod end bearings are flown until they get sloppy, inboard hinge hole and bolt are worn and sloppy, the old airplane is very close to 2,000 hard hours, and she will not go into aileron flutter with the simple fix of Kolb's aileron counterbalance weights. I would recommend installation of counter balance weights on all Kolb aircraft whether you have experienced flutter or not. Why wait until it is too late to fix? I have also experienced severe aileron flutter. If the Kolb wings were not at strong as they are, I am sure I would have had them ripped right off the airplane on many occassions on all three of my Kolbs, US, FS and MKIII. Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Denny Rowe" <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Duane Cole RIP
Date: Feb 05, 2004
Guys, The flying community lost a great one on Tuesday 2/3/04 when Mr Duane Cole Passed away of natural causes. I met Mr Cole and his Son once at Sun N Fun, he was a real gentleman and a living legend. Rest in peace Mr Cole, Denny Rowe PS: For more info on Mr Cole, check out eaa.org. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 05, 2004
From: curtis groote <cgroote1(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: first-time builder
I'm a novice soon to start on a Firestar. Your thoughts on a table to build it on or to buy; someone suggested getting a smarttool level - if so, 2 or 4 feet?; suggestions on an air compressor to take care of both riveting and spray painting. Thanks. __________________________________ http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Linda Rowe" <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Re: Balance Master
Date: Feb 04, 2004
Subject: Kolb-List: Balance Master > > Anybody have any experience with using a Balance Master dynamic balancer on > the crank of a Rotax? > > Richard Pike > MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > > Richard, I have a B/M on the prop flange of my Mk-3s 2SI engine, I took it off once and noticed a little more vibration than with it installed, put it back on and seemed to feel an improvement. Figure I'll be leaving it on from now on. The one on the crank would probably help the same way. Dennis Rowe, PA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Christopher Armstrong" <tophera(at)centurytel.net>
Subject: Wing Mod Weights
Date: Feb 05, 2004
Everyone/All, Very close Will, especially the "ground" part. Actually we did the outboard rib reinforcement because of hard landings! Hard landings to the point of gear bending and wing tip striking the ground. On even a fairly light strike, the upper rib tube would buckle and then it would be a big repair job. The angle reinforcement would help prevent damage with light strikes, and we felt was worth the extra weight. A determined individual could still do serious damage, but the angle did provided a larger no-damage window. Dennis So Dennis, do you feel that adding those braces to more then just the outboard rib makes sense? Do you feel that they improve the wing structurally for flight loads? I don't want to sound negative, stronger wings are fine... but I just don't like adding weight if it isn't required, or especially where it isn't doing you a bit of good. Topher ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Harris" <rharris@magnolia-net.com>
Subject: Re: work table
Date: Feb 05, 2004
However my background tends to make me build things level with the ground ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Petty" <Lynnp@c-gate.net> OK, Paul you got me with that one.. What kind of background? Richard ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: : Kolb-List:Fuel Octane
Date: Feb 05, 2004
> I don't know why the difference, the book says 87 octane, so that's what it > gets & it seems to run OK > Richard Pike > MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Richard/All: The way I understand octane is it is there for one thing only, to prevent detonation, which is hard on a four stroke and murder on a two stroke. Increased octane over and above what the engine requires for detonation prevention does not increase power. Correct me if I am wrong please. john h PS: But I have to agree, sometimes stuff makes us feel better whether it changes anything or not. Like an airplane that is freshly washed and cleaned up always flies better than it did dirty. :-) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Timandjan(at)aol.com
Date: Feb 05, 2004
Subject: Re: work table
Some things I did that were helpful were to build them fairly tall so you don't have to bend over to work on the wings, also the saw horses rather than a solid table were heflful so you can access the wing from underneath. I actually drilled anchors into the concrete floot and bolted them down. I also have used bondo and glued them down, Bondo is amazingly strong. For building the tails, ailerons etc, I found a hollow core door and set it on sawhorses, which worked great.nbsp;nbsp; I used hollow core cause for some of the fabricating I cut pieces out of the work surface, for instance when building the vertical stab, I cut a hole for the fuselage tube ring so it would lay flat as I fabricated. Take your time, build jigs to hold things and have fun. Tim ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 05, 2004
Subject: Re: from class
From: ul15rhb(at)juno.com
Paul, Take another look at what the rule says: Q. Can someone with a valid state driver's license but who has been denied a FAA medical still fly as a sport pilot? A. Yes. As a sport pilot, per SFAR 89 Sections 15 and 17, as long as you have a current and valid U.S. driver's license. However, if your medically disqualifying condition also prohibits you from driving a car, then the answer would be NO, until such time as a licensed physician medically certifies you safe to drive. Ralph Original Firestar 17 years flying it > > Kolbers, > Another interesting note applies to the NPRM sport pilot rule. One > catch to the new rule that is not mentioned is that if a pilot fails > a medical, he or she will not be able to fly under the new rule. If > you fail a medical your done. If you do however let your current > medical expire then you can fly under the new rule. If you fail a > medical you will have then pass a medical and then let it expire to > go SP. > > > Take Care... > > pp > > > = > = > = > = > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Sport Pilot
Date: Feb 05, 2004
> A. Yes. As a sport pilot, per SFAR 89 Sections 15 and 17, as long as you > have a current and valid U.S. driver's license. However, if your > medically disqualifying condition also prohibits you from driving a car, > then the answer would be NO, until such time as a licensed physician > medically certifies you safe to drive. > > Ralph Ralph/All: Eric Tucker passed this information that he personally received from the FAA as part of the workgroup. The above is what most folks think is the way it will work. However, according to Eric, it does not work that way. If you have a good medical, go in to have it renewed and flunk it, you are out. No fly Sport Pilot. However, if you have a good medical, know you probably have something that would preclude passing another Class III or higher medical, do not go to a flight surgeon, let it expire, then you can do the Sport Pilot thing with a valid drivers license. If you don't have anything to preclude passing a Class III or higher, allow it to expire, you are good to go with Sport Pilot if you have a valid drivers license. Of course, Eric also told us this has not been approved in final form. Still has to go before OMB or some such. If I have any doubt in my mind that I may not be able to pass my next Class III, I am not going to get it renewed until after the final on Sport Pilot. We shall have to wait and see what transpires. I have not kept up with Sport Pilot. Don't claim to know anything about it. Only repeating what I heard Eric Tucker present in class the other day. Take care, john h john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Wing Mod Weights
Date: Feb 05, 2004
> strike, the upper rib tube would buckle and then it would be a big repair > job. The angle reinforcement would help prevent damage with light strikes, > and we felt was worth the extra weight. A determined individual could still > do serious damage, but the angle did provided a larger no-damage window. > > Dennis Dennis/All: When I broke my landing gear at Muncho Lake, BC, 1 July 2000, I was still moving at a good clip after the gear leg and gear leg mount was wiped off the fuselage. The load of the aircraft, which was probably around 1100 lbs at the time, was carried by the right main gear and the left wing tip. When it was all over, it was the outboard rib aft of the main spar that was sharing all that load with the right main gear. The rib failed between on top over the main spar where it buckled. The remainder of the rib was in good shape. The second rib next to the OB rib was pushed up on slightly as the result of the trailing edge tube pushing up on it. When I repaired the wing, I replaced the OB rib, was able to pull the 2d rib back into position. I replaced the bowtip from mid point to the trailing edge, all straight tube. Replaced the trailing edge tube back to the mid point between 2d and 3d rib. Did the same thing for the OB section of the aileron. That was the extent of damage and hard replacement and repair. Had the ribs not had the aluminum angle reinforcements, that includes the first four OB ribs, I am sure I would have been into much more material repair and replacement, possibly the main spar. Had that happened, i would have scrapped the left wing and started from scratch. Take care, john h PS: Thanks for the idea for the ribs from years past. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 06, 2004
From: Terry <tkrolfe(at)usadatanet.net>
Subject: (no subject)
Richard, Thanks for posting the url for Top-Flight.com and showing the gang the tip shape that I put on my Tennessee prop. Hopefully this will end some of the confusion as to what I did! What did you construct your intake silencer out of? I too am considering making my own before I pony up the cost of the Rotax model. Form you post I take it it wasn't as effective as you had expected. Any changes you might make if you were to do it again? Can you post pics? Thanks, Terry - FireFly #95 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Denny Rowe" <rowedl(at)highstream.net>
Subject: Re: work table
Date: Feb 06, 2004
> > What do you mean, "my final post ??" Many people, including myself, have > been thoroughly enjoying your progress, and some of your ideas are very > good. Don't let a comment put you off ! ! ! For myself, I didn't think it > was serious, anyway, just kind of a dig. You know I've taken a good share > of those myself in good humor. Hang in there, Paul, and stick with us. > Your Buddy Lar. > > Larry Bourne > Palm Springs, CA > Building Kolb Mk III > N78LB Vamoose > www.gogittum.com I second this opinion, please reconsider Paul, you are a vital part of this forum. Dennis Rowe ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: work table
Date: Feb 06, 2004
Paul....Hmmm.....I hope it aint gonna be your final post..I am enjoying watching your building progress, I think your work is good! let me tell ya how I veiw the membership of this list Paul. It is Kinda like sitting in on a large card game....Dealers choice....and its a 7 card game..bet every card... Every question you ask of the members is like a bet....and every answer is like a card...... You are gonna get some good cards...and some bad ones too maybe...so dont worry about em ...you need em all so you can choose the hand ya want to play. Just like poker...you keep the answers you want in your hand...and ya toss the ones ya dont... Stay in the game pard....and keep betting..cause ya never know when you are gonna draw an ACE!. Don Gherardini Sales / Engineering dept. American Honda Engines Power Equipment Company CortLand, Illinois 800-626-7326 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kirby Dennis Contr ASC/TM <Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland.af.mil>
Subject: Re: first-time builder
Date: Feb 06, 2004
<< suggestions on an air compressor to take care of both riveting and spray painting. Thanks. >> Curtis - You do not need an air compressor to do your riveting. A good-quality hand rivet puller will do the job just fine, since they're all 1/8th inch rivets. (With the exception of about half a dozen 3/16th rivets, which your hand-powered tool can also handle.) Many Kolb builders have used air-driven riveting tools to build their planes, and there is no doubt it makes the job a bit easier. But if you have the strength of an average man's handshake, you don't need the compressor. Bonus: When you are finished, you'll have the strength of a strong man's handshake! Dennis Kirby Mark-3, all 3000 rivets hand-squeezed in Cedar Crest, NM ________________________________________________________________________________
From: TAILDRAGGER503(at)aol.com
Date: Feb 06, 2004
Subject: Re: first-time builder
A two foot level is fine,you can always extend it with a straight edge of any lenth. A band saw with a metal cutting blade is nice for cutting tubes. A hand riveter with a adjusting head. A table vise. I mounted a potable belt sander to my shop table.(works great) A punch and clecos makes building easyer. Dave Snyder Building 2001 FSII ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 06, 2004
From: Terry <tkrolfe(at)usadatanet.net>
Subject: Re: Silencer box
Richard Pike wrote: > > Got the silencer box project posted to the web page, > http://www.bcchapel.org/pages/0003/pg15.html > > If anybody has any constructive suggestions, > ("constructive" being the operative word, ) > I am open to suggestions to make it better. > > Richard Pike > MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > > Richard, Nice job on the construction of your intake silencer!!! Thanks for posting the pictures. Gives me ideas of how I might try to make one. As far as I understand the science behind the silencing, it is the ability to divide the sound up into two channels that can be made out of phase with each other, thereby canceling each other out. That's why I believe you can observe two ports exiting the plastic bottle of the Rotax model. I suspect they are of different length in side the bottle which would cause them to be out of phase with each other canceling each other out. Same as was observed in the silencer on the air-conditioning unit. My problem is that I don't have the math or data to know how to go about doing this other then guess work. Maybe someone else could supply the data!!! On your model you have diverted the sound around a curved path, but it doesn't cancel any of the pulses. Also the fabric sides will transmit the sound like a drum to the out side if I understand your construction correctly. Still by diverting the intake as you have done will get some reduction in noise. Wish I could cut apart a Rotax silencer to be able to measure the tubes inside. But, then again that would be piracy, I guess. Also wish I knew of a sound engineer to consult with!!!! Hope you don't take offense to my comments! Only thinking out loud without having the expertise to back up any thing I said. Thanks again for sharing. Terry - FireFly #95 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "garvelink" <link(at)cdc.net>
Subject: Re: mod weight
Date: Feb 06, 2004
Don, What about the Ultrastar? do you know if there have been any structural failures? SRGLINK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: mod weight > > HIya Gang.....that rob mod that Paul did...it is described zactly the same > in my FireFly Builders manual...and required on the outboard ribs. > The Logic certainly makes sense to me, and although not mentioned in the > plans...I bet is serves 2 problems that could occour. > > 1st is the known aileron flutter occurance... > Control surface flutter is as often not induced by a occilating flex between > the control surface and the attachment structure.(not just the air passing > to fast over both). If you build a Kolb wing, as you are finished but just > before you add the prescribed angles, you can lift the trailing edge at the > tip very slightly..or anywhere around the bow, and it will rise up before > the spar begins to rise....I measured the "flex" in my wing before the > addition of the angles and it was 3/8 of an inch on the trailing edge...and > slightly more at the center of the bow tip. > > As I have been exposed to control surface flutter twice previously in my > life...this disturbed me greatly..(read that as scared the living chit outta > me)...Not in a Kolb...but even after 20 years...everytime a rudder or an > aileron bounces in a thermal....I get the puckers.... > > So after installing the prescribed angles....this flex was reduced...not > completely...but significantly... After myself and 2 of my A&P friends were > standing around this structure on my bench...the general opinion was another > rib was needed between the Bow area ...which was a greater span than the > ribs spacing. So I added a rib...and a tad more bow stiffining structure. > The goal was to get the wing to be able to be lifted at the trailing edge, > and at the bow...with no flex. we accomplished that. This also preserved the > airfoil profile out a little further towards the tip..with the resulting > taper that is so common to a Kolb wing reduced. > > I might add that the 2 compadres of mine...both fellow college buds from > Spartan, have been in the AC industry since we got out of school. 1 went to > work at McDonnel-Douglas...and spent 10 years building F-4s.then on to the > american airlines airframe overhaul center in Tulsa...and the other went to > work for Fairchild building Metroliners till the plant closed. These 2 > fellas know more about control surface building and rigging than I can ever > hope to...so their advice was heeded...I should give some credit > here...Cheif Bob( I still call the old F-4 Crew Cheif that) is the > Metroliner man...and he insisted that He be here when the controls were > rigged...even tho he lives several hundred miles away...he made me promise > to let him do it. Well he has never rigged a Kolb...but he came up and told > me to sit my but down over there and watch, and he did it. When I flew the > first flight...no trim was needed, and no adjustments..it flew straight as a > string! > > .Then there was that other fella who wore out a firestar...and explained to > me just how the wing failed...I paid alot of attention to him also. > > I think they all would approve of your wing Paul. > > Don Gherardini > Sales / Engineering dept. > American Honda Engines > Power Equipment Company > CortLand, Illinois > 800-626-7326 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Souder" <flykolb(at)pa.net>
Subject: Re: Wing Mod Weights
Date: Feb 07, 2004
> Good question Topher, I am certain you already have a very good grasp on these issues, but the following is what runs through my mind as I ponder your question: To answer your question, I would need to have some knowledge of 1) the intended use of the aircraft and 2) firm grasp of the whole related structure*, and more specifically, 3) spedific knowledge of the weakest point of the structure. 4) The weight factor, can I justify adding the additional weight. 5) Accumulated fleet experience. The only reason I would consider doing any reinforcement would be if I felt reasonably sure that I had pinpointed the weakest link(s). Every structure has a weak link. If you pull a chain till it breaks, most of the time just one link will break - not every link simultaneously. And probably the chain will not have broken until well past its rated strength. So to arbitrarily chose one link and reinforce it to make it stronger is really pointless and a waste of time - or, in the case of aircraft, even worse: If you reinforce a stronger link, then you have weakened the whole structure because the reinforcement has made the airplane heavier and that much more stress will be place on the weakest link. Useage: I would need to know something about the intended use of the aircraft. To fly normally as most of us do, I would say probably not. But if I planned on doing aerobatics like John H. used to do ... I probably would. Interesting comment about John adding the reinforcement for reasons of dependability when flying off the beaten path, etc.; I can understand that reasoning as well; although when his gear failed, his trip still ended, even with the reinforcements. I would consider adding reinforcement ONLY because I would know that the wing ribs were the weakest link in the wing structure. I hasten to add that I believe the Kolb wings are as strong as the stated rating. (At least the ratings of Old Kolb, I am not uptodate on new Kolb specs.) And if the ribs are the weakest link in the structure then it would make sense to consider reinforcing them, but only if I felt the rated strength of the aircraft was not sufficient for my purposes - which brings us back to the intended use issue. For building an aircraft for myself, this is how I would answer the question, to reinforce the ribs or not, for the Old Kolb models: FireFly: No. Reason: The FF is an ultralight and 1) I would want to keep the weight under 254 and 2) I would not do aerobatics. FireStar: No. With 7 ribs it is actually stronger than the old TSs and both the FS and TS have been amply proven for its intended use. And no aerbatics. Mark-III: No. With 9 ribs, it is very strong, well proven, bla bla bla. And again no aerobatics. SS: Yes. It is already as tough as nails, but I probably could not resist kicking up my heels. For TNK: Kolbra: Don't know, not really familiar with the changes to the wing. My convictions and throughts on the subject. Hope this helps. Dennis *Part of my knowledge of structures comes from an indepth study of structures; from elaborate computer stress analysis; and from devouring whole libraries of relevant literature. Actually the preceeding statement(s) is not really true. I learded about structures from breaking so many of them! In fact, I was the chief cook and airplane breaker at Kolb. At least until JH came along ... One day Homer sez to me "Dennis, you know you don't need to break our airpanes any more." I must have looked pretty shocked because Homer then added. You don't need to break airplanes any more because JH is doing it now. And I said to my self: "Self, Homer is right, JH is doing a very capable job of breaking airplanes." And the more I thought about it the more amazed I was that JH could pick up on this challenging job so quickly. So ever since then I stopped breaking Kolb airplanes. And then much later on JH too retired from the brokering business. Is there anyone doing it these days??? > > So Dennis, do you feel that adding those braces to more then just the > outboard rib makes sense? Do you feel that they improve the wing > structurally for flight loads? I don't want to sound negative, stronger > wings are fine... but I just don't like adding weight if it isn't required, > or especially where it isn't doing you a bit of good. > > Topher > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 07, 2004
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Silencer box
I like the idea of running an inlet tube under the wing, that is good. Something to be careful of is trying to get too much pressure with ram air without compensating the float bowls. One of our listers who also owns a hot rod Sonerai set up his cowling to force ram air into the air filter box area. He discovered that if you get too much ram air going through the Bing throttle bores, and the air flow becomes a pressure rather than a suction, then the carbs cease to draw the fuel up out of the float bowls, and the engine shuts off. You have to maintain a carb bore suction situation at all times, UNLESS you are clever enough to properly vent the float bowls into your ram air plenum and pressurize them to the same extent that you pressurize the carb bore airflow, as Jack alludes to below. As you vary the pressure and suction differential between the carb bores and the float bowl vent lines, I think you will be able to vary the mixture, but I think you also stand a chance of either flooding the engine or else having your fuel flow suddenly cease, so be careful. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) >Richard, > >You might want to consider running a tube from the silencer air inlet to >some where below the wing. It may give you a little boost in air >pressure. In trying to come up with a way to control air fuel mixture, I >have taken some pressure data from the FireFly and I discovered that the >static air pressure at carburetor height is about 2 inches of water less >than below the wing at 55 mph. If you turn the tube inlet into the air >stream, you can get dynamic pressure on top of the static pressure >difference. This pressure difference may help you get back the air flow >that you believe that you have lost. > >To check this out, I am building a right angle elbow air flow insert to >mount on the Bing in the place of the filter. In my case I am going to >run a flexible one inch ID tube to the air filter that is going to be >suspended below the wing. In making the elbow, I have exposed the >percolation vent so that I can change pressures to see if it will effect >air fuel ratio while flying. I hope to finish up the elbow today. > >Still waiting for weather to clear and snow & ice to melt so I can run the >lowered thrust line experiment with a 56 inch IVO prop. Experimentation >is fun, but only if you get to fly once in a while. We got six inches of >snow yesterday. Back to the shop. > >Jack B. Hart FF004 >Jackson, MO > > >Jack & Louise Hart >jbhart(at)ldd.net > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 07, 2004
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Silencer box
>As far as I understand the science behind the silencing, it is the ability to >divide the sound up into two channels that can be made out of phase with each >other, thereby canceling each other out. That's why I believe you can observe >two ports exiting the plastic bottle of the Rotax model. I suspect they are >of different length in side the bottle which would cause them to be out of >phase with each other canceling each other out. Same as was observed in the >silencer on the air-conditioning unit. >On your model you have diverted the sound around a curved path, but it doesn't >cancel any of the pulses. I think you have analyzed my problem correctly. Not sure how I'll modify it, but at least I think I understand the problem better. >Also the fabric sides will transmit the sound like >a drum to the out side if I understand your construction correctly. Still by >diverting the intake as you have done will get some reduction in noise. No, the fabric is just glued to the outside of the plywood to reinforce it, waterproof it, and make it look nice. >Hope you don't take offense to my comments! Only thinking out loud without >having the expertise to back up any thing I said. Thanks again for sharing. > >Terry - FireFly #95 Take offense, are you kidding? If I knew in December what (I think) I know now, it might have worked better. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "garvelink" <link(at)cdc.net>
Subject: Re: Wing Mod Weights
Date: Feb 07, 2004
Dennis, how well constructed is the Ultrastar? Srglink ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dennis Souder" <flykolb(at)pa.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Wing Mod Weights > > > Good question Topher, > > I am certain you already have a very good grasp on these issues, but the > following is what runs through my mind as I ponder your question: To answer > your question, I would need to have some knowledge of 1) the intended use of > the aircraft and 2) firm grasp of the whole related structure*, and more > specifically, 3) spedific knowledge of the weakest point of the structure. > 4) The weight factor, can I justify adding the additional weight. 5) > Accumulated fleet experience. > > The only reason I would consider doing any reinforcement would be if I felt > reasonably sure that I had pinpointed the weakest link(s). Every structure > has a weak link. If you pull a chain till it breaks, most of the time just > one link will break - not every link simultaneously. And probably the chain > will not have broken until well past its rated strength. So to arbitrarily > chose one link and reinforce it to make it stronger is really pointless and > a waste of time - or, in the case of aircraft, even worse: If you reinforce > a stronger link, then you have weakened the whole structure because the > reinforcement has made the airplane heavier and that much more stress will > be place on the weakest link. > > Useage: I would need to know something about the intended use of the > aircraft. To fly normally as most of us do, I would say probably not. But > if I planned on doing aerobatics like John H. used to do ... I probably > would. Interesting comment about John adding the reinforcement for reasons > of dependability when flying off the beaten path, etc.; I can understand > that reasoning as well; although when his gear failed, his trip still ended, > even with the reinforcements. > > I would consider adding reinforcement ONLY because I would know that the > wing ribs were the weakest link in the wing structure. I hasten to add that > I believe the Kolb wings are as strong as the stated rating. (At least the > ratings of Old Kolb, I am not uptodate on new Kolb specs.) And if the ribs > are the weakest link in the structure then it would make sense to consider > reinforcing them, but only if I felt the rated strength of the aircraft was > not sufficient for my purposes - which brings us back to the intended use > issue. > > For building an aircraft for myself, this is how I would answer the > question, to reinforce the ribs or not, for the Old Kolb models: > FireFly: No. Reason: The FF is an ultralight and 1) I would want to keep > the weight under 254 and 2) I would not do aerobatics. > FireStar: No. With 7 ribs it is actually stronger than the old TSs and > both the FS and TS have been amply proven for its intended use. And no > aerbatics. > Mark-III: No. With 9 ribs, it is very strong, well proven, bla bla bla. > And again no aerobatics. > SS: Yes. It is already as tough as nails, but I probably could not > resist kicking up my heels. > For TNK: > Kolbra: Don't know, not really familiar with the changes to the wing. > > My convictions and throughts on the subject. Hope this helps. > > Dennis > > *Part of my knowledge of structures comes from an indepth study of > structures; from elaborate computer stress analysis; and from devouring > whole libraries of relevant literature. Actually the preceeding > statement(s) is not really true. I learded about structures from breaking > so many of them! In fact, I was the chief cook and airplane breaker at > Kolb. At least until JH came along ... One day Homer sez to me "Dennis, > you know you don't need to break our airpanes any more." I must have looked > pretty shocked because Homer then added. You don't need to break airplanes > any more because JH is doing it now. And I said to my self: "Self, Homer is > right, JH is doing a very capable job of breaking airplanes." And the more > I thought about it the more amazed I was that JH could pick up on this > challenging job so quickly. So ever since then I stopped breaking Kolb > airplanes. And then much later on JH too retired from the brokering > business. Is there anyone doing it these days??? > > > > > > So Dennis, do you feel that adding those braces to more then just the > > outboard rib makes sense? Do you feel that they improve the wing > > structurally for flight loads? I don't want to sound negative, stronger > > wings are fine... but I just don't like adding weight if it isn't > required, > > or especially where it isn't doing you a bit of good. > > > > Topher > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 07, 2004
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Wing Mod Weights
Everyone agrees that Kolb ribs are probably the weakest link in the whole wing structure, yet SOP is to drill them full of unnecessary 1/8" rivet holes all down their top & bottom surface to secure the fabric, (when they could be just as easily rib stitched, and probably with less weight) then we discuss the need to add extra braces to make the wing stronger. Am I the only one that sees something odd about this picture? (Yes. Shut up, take your funnel, and go back to your silencer box...) Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > >I would consider adding reinforcement ONLY because I would know that the >wing ribs were the weakest link in the wing structure. I hasten to add that >I believe the Kolb wings are as strong as the stated rating. (At least the >ratings of Old Kolb, I am not uptodate on new Kolb specs.) And if the ribs >are the weakest link in the structure then it would make sense to consider >reinforcing them, but only if I felt the rated strength of the aircraft was >not sufficient for my purposes - which brings us back to the intended use >issue. > >Dennis ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Christopher Armstrong" <tophera(at)centurytel.net>
Subject: Wing Mod Weights
Date: Feb 07, 2004
Thanks Dennis, That's about what I feel about it, but I will always defer to your and John H's experience based knowledge and improvements over my theoretical musings about these airplanes. You guys know, I only think I know! The only locations that I felt a need to beef up on my wing was diagonally bracing the leading edge tube to the main spar using 1/2 inch tubing. I did that before I understood the mode of John H's leading edge failure. If I build another Kolb I will make the front of the root rib out of 4130 instead of the aluminum rib nose. I also am adding additional support to the flaperon hinges since I have made them nearly full span and can deploy them as flaps for trim changes and steeper approaches so they will see significantly more load then the standard plane. I also shortened each wing to 12 feet eliminating the wing trailing edge and aileron leading edge splices. This significantly strengthened the bow tip simply by making it a foot shorter and makes the entire wing subject to less bending moment. It will cost me in wing efficiency but it should provide me with slightly higher cruise speed, a more comfortable ride in turbulence by raising the wing loading and combined with the near full span flaperons more control in crosswinds. I also added a bit more Dihedral to get more roll stability, but that will make crosswinds worse. Why can't any one change be good for everything? Wings are rigged with slightly less incidence and the tail wheel leg shortened increasing aircraft ground incidence to compensate. My goal with these mods was to favor cross country flying very slightly over short field performance (which is so good as to be ridiculous.) You may notice that most of these mods are made by taking something away from the plane not adding something. Should be one of the lightest FSII 503dc out there. Time will tell if I have made a mess out of a very well optimized plane... Topher ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Christopher Armstrong" <tophera(at)centurytel.net>
Subject: Silencer box
Date: Feb 07, 2004
Who is up for a SWAG. ( newbys SWAG stands for Scientific Wild Ass Guess.) If you put a hole in your nice finished box right in front of the current outlet you would have a short path and a long path. The differences in length are equal to a time when you devide by the speed of sound. ~1000 feet per second. If that distance is equal to n+0.5 ( n=0 or any positive integer ) wave lengths at the frequency that you want to squash then you will get the canceling effect that you are looking for. So if you want to squash say 11000hz (5500 rpm times two cylinders sucking) then you have (~1000ft/sec)/(11000/sec)= .091 feet (1.1 inches) peek to peek. If I did any of this right if you set your length to (n+0.5)*1.1 inches you should get some wave canceling effect. This will squash all the frequencies that are multiples of the target frequency as well, 22000hz 33000hz etc. What you have to do is get the magnitudes of the two waves that same so that they can completely eliminate each other. Most likely the short path is louder then the long path so they cant completely cancel each other. By the way if you end up at an n*1.1 inches length you double the noise, and you would double the noise at every frequency that has this length, in this case the half multiples of 11000; 5500, 16500, 27500 etc. So .55, 1.65, 2.75, 3.85, 4.95, 6.05, 7.15, 8.25 inches would cancel your primary frequency and all the whole multiples while boosting all the half multiples. So you need to know the sound spectrum of the noise and pick the length based on which frequencies to squash and at the same time avoiding the ones that you can't be doubling. Course I could be FOS cause it is just a SWAG. Topher ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 07, 2004
From: Ted Cowan <tcowan1917(at)direcway.com>
Subject: Re: wings
a related story here brings up a what I believe to be a good question. If the Firefly does well, as does the SlingShot, as does the Kobra, then why wouldnt shortning the Original Firestar wing (removing the added materials, i.e., 12 inche extension on each wing) provide a lighter, more efficient wing than the standard 27 footer. I have the original firestar, five rib, been flying it for over seven years, and cannot think of any improvement that I would make to it. It is probably the best flying Kolb ever built. Performs like a dream and if you learn to fly it well, will get you in or out of just about anything. Notice I did not say without bumping around. But -- being five ribs, wouldnt reducing the length of the wing have very profound good benefits; speed, efficiency, weight and still have pretty much the soft, slow landings I have come to know. I would think that would be better than adding beef to the dead cow. Of course, I might be wrong cause shorter might give you more speed easier and thus needing the beefing. I have had mine up to and including the 80 - 85 plus that I have heard about without any flutter -- just feels like it is really fast and gets real light on the controls. Just my thinking. Am rebuilding the ole white lightning from ground up and just getting to the wings. Not going to make any changes in the original design. Cant improve on something this good. (not and sell it too). What do you say about that. ted cowan, alabama ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Christopher Armstrong" <tophera(at)centurytel.net>
Subject: Re: wings
Date: Feb 07, 2004
If the Firefly does well, as does the SlingShot, as does the Kobra, then why wouldnt shortning the Original Firestar wing (removing the added materials, i.e., 12 inche extension on each wing) provide a lighter, more efficient wing than the standard 27 footer. Shorter wingspan means lower aspect ratio and reduced wing efficiency. But oddly enough that does not necessarily mean worse performance across the speed range. Airfoils are optimized for lift to drag at a given lift value. The designer try's to size the wing so that at his chosen airspeed the wing is operating at that most efficient lift coefficient. On the FSII with their generous wing area the airspeed where the wing is operating at that lift coefficient is fairly slow. As you speed up each foot of wing needs a lower lift coefficient because there is more wind and you get farther and farther away from this optimum lift coefficient. By reducing wing span the wing area is reduced and the speed where the wing operates most efficiently increases. At any given lift coefficient the wing is less efficient but at points that were above the target speed before the trim job you can end up with a net improvement, below it you end up with a reduction. If you get carried away the performance goes down everywhere and you feel real bad about your choices. If you add wing span the performance goes up below the sweet spot and down slightly above it. If a plane gets heavier and you add wing span you can often gain back the initial performance because you are getting back to the original sweet spot( less the weight penalty). If you decrease the weight you also are reducing the Lift required and shifting the plane below the sweet spot. Part of my decision to clip my wings is that I am fairly light (160 pounds on a bad day) and I plan on putting a bare minimum of gear on the plane, keeping it light as well. I will need lower lift coefficient then some of you big boys with lots of in plane toys, and I am willing to give up a bit of the short field capability for a small increase in cruise, so a bit less wing should be a benefit for me. Of course it could backfire and my plane might suck! Topher ________________________________________________________________________________
From: snuffy(at)usol.com
Subject: Re: more wing
Date: Feb 07, 2004
. The accelerated air from the prop suction > causes a lot of pressure loss under the wing. Mine must be missing a > good 20% of lift as it is right now. So what happens then in a case like Richard Pikes parasol wing? I think his lift is improved. It still has the accelerated air from the prop suction. Does it have something to do with the turbulance caused by the air spilling off the wing into the center section? Kirk Do not archive ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: more wing
Date: Feb 07, 2004
> I have wondered the same thing. I know that performance has improved, but > is it primarily because the prop is getting fed more and somewhat less > turbulent air, and especially in a way that the thrust is not all from the > top half of the disc? (pushing the nose down) Or is the wing doing more? > And how would you know which? > Richard Pike Richard/All: Since I am not an engineer or mathematician, I must look at "stuff" with the little bit or "horse sense" I have left. Was thinking about the statement above. My question is: Would it make any difference on nose pitch down, whether the top or bottom of the prop is creating the thrust, since the prop is attached to the aircraft by the prop shaft in the center of the prop? Not trying to be a wise ass, but trying to learn. Thanks, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: snuffy(at)usol.com
Subject: Re: more wing
Date: Feb 07, 2004
My question is: Would it make any > difference on nose pitch down, whether the top or bottom of the prop is > creating the thrust, since the prop is attached to the aircraft by the prop > shaft in the center of the prop? I know that if I put the prop in a vertical position on my Minimax I can grab the top end and lift the tail of the plane off the ground. Of course it's a Warp Drive and I wouldn't do it with any other prop. ;o) Do not archive ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 07, 2004
From: Richard Pike <rwpike(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: more wing
I came by my theory by visualizing pushing it - say you could have a model MKIII and the wing was the main source of drag, and you could push on it by pushing on the prop with your finger. If you had a two blade prop, and you pushed on the back side and end of the top blade, the thrust vector would go through the hub, but the push would tend to push the nose down. But if you pushed on the back side and end of the downward pointing blade, then it would tend to push the nose up, the force still going through the hub. Anyway, that is how I picture it, but in high school physics class, I had to sit on the back row. (The better your grades, the closer to the front you sat, and vice versa...) (The problem was I was trying to be a wise ass, but the test scores usually pointed more toward the dumb variety) Now what we need is a reality check by one of the listers who didn't sit on the back row. Guys? Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > > > > I have wondered the same thing. I know that performance has improved, but > > is it primarily because the prop is getting fed more and somewhat less > > turbulent air, and especially in a way that the thrust is not all from the > > top half of the disc? (pushing the nose down) Or is the wing doing more? > > And how would you know which? > > Richard Pike > >Richard/All: > >Since I am not an engineer or mathematician, I must look at "stuff" with the >little bit or "horse sense" I have left. > >Was thinking about the statement above. My question is: Would it make any >difference on nose pitch down, whether the top or bottom of the prop is >creating the thrust, since the prop is attached to the aircraft by the prop >shaft in the center of the prop? > >Not trying to be a wise ass, but trying to learn. > >Thanks, > >john h > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Thom Riddle" <jtriddle(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: more wing
Date: Feb 07, 2004
Mr. Pike's analysis is correct. For those who understand moments (anyone doing weight and balance should be familiar with the term) and or torque(same thing really), what is happening with asymmetrical thrust(more on top compared to bottom), a moment (or torque) is created about the lateral axis (think wing span) resulting in a nose down pitching force(moment). I sat in the front row but mostly because I've been hard-of-hearing to stone deaf and back to hard-of-hearing over the years. But being in the fron row there was little I could do to avoid learning something occasionally and this sort of stuff stuck with me for some reason. Thom in Buffalo ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Gherardini" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Subject: Re: Wing Mod Weights
Date: Feb 07, 2004
brother Pike a post you made caused me to think of a time WAAAYYY back,,,,back at Spartan when I was in the Airframe classes... snip<<<


January 10, 2004 - February 07, 2004

Kolb-Archive.digest.vol-et