Kolb-Archive.digest.vol-ho

June 18, 2008 - July 07, 2008



From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: William Sullivans Accident
At 06:46 PM 6/18/2008, David Key wrote: >I thought I'd heard everything now I'm hearing about un-gusts? LOL!! What's so funny? Sailors have spoken of "non puffs" for years. It's a sudden, brief, lull in an otherwise steady wind. -Dana -- Please let me know if you did not receive this. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 18, 2008
From: Ben Ransom <bransom(at)ucdavis.edu>
Subject: Crow Hopping -- was WSullivan's accident
Although it's as old as Seafoam discussions, I dare post my own opinion again on "crow hopping". It's probably 10 years, so what the heck, here it is. I am a proponent of them, in ultralights, if done after dual training in a like aircraft. Crow hopping has two key pieces: Foremost is getting there in baby steps. Second, keep a mindset of very minor throttle changes, whether they be increase or decrease in rpm, and similarly, stay with minimal stick pitch changes. And I'm talking dual here!! I had 4.5 hours of transition training in a 2-place phantom many years ago. Most of that was crow hops, which started out as taxi, then fast taxi, etc. By hour 3 I would go down the runway just at flying speed, jockeying all 4 control inputs as needed. Important too, no wind until I was pretty good at it. I did a lot of flight with wheels 0 to 2ft AGL. No sudden moves, no surprises. Guess what, I got darn good at controlling the plane in that configuration, even adding in wind. When it came time to test fly my never before flown Firestar, I was confident of being able to handle transition issues near the ground. I'm posting just for the record that there are at least some (or at least one ;) ) who maintain that learning crow hopping properly is a good thing. Flying at altitude -- that's a lot simpler, and should be optional. -Ben/ KXP ps: All the best to you William -- get well soon. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: David Key <dhkey(at)msn.com>
Subject: Un-gusts
Date: Jun 18, 2008
Here are some phrases and terms I haven't figured out yet but I don=92t nee d an explanation to. What is concerning is that I've seen them applied to a ccident scenarios on this list. "kolb drop", "the air went away", and "un-gusts" I know being a pilot has the built in responsibility of always learning but in these cases I think it could work against you. Un-Gusts LOL!! I'm still cracking up. What's next, un-lift, my plane hit some un-lift and well as y ou can understand I was screwed. At some point someone has to call fiction fiction and made up made up and bull bull. If it's only to maintain some ki nd of integrity to this list, the phrases and terms used for years and to p revent new pilots from a total state of confusion. You know there is someon e out there thinking =93kolb-drop=94, =93un-gusts=94 I don=92t understand t his=85 (and you shouldn=92t) Have you ever heard this=85 "the forecast calls for ceilings two thousand b roken and winds 180 @ 16 un-gusts to 21" of course you haven=92t and you w on=92t. Have you ever heard the tower say =93use caution we=92ve had report s of un-gusts 2 miles off of 18=85=94 me neither and I won=92t. Have you ev er read in an FAA accident report that the plane went down due to un-gusts? Well your not going to. But you don=92t have to believe me, call a briefer and tell them you were c oncerned about un-gusts along your route and ask him if he can recommend a alternate route around the un-gusts. Then ponder this answer, =93well it=92 s defiantly gustier to the North so I=92d say you should go there I expect much less un-gusting there.=94 The weather was pleasant in Texas today there were un-tornados, un-rain and un-wind all day long, un-fortunately it was very un-cold. Would there be un-gusts if there weren=92t gusts and there wasn=92t someone there to fly in it? Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:24:23 -0400To: kolb-list(at)matronics.comFrom: d-m-h ague(at)comcast.netSubject: RE: Kolb-List: William Sullivans AccidentAt 06:46 PM 6/18/2008, David Key wrote: I thought I'd heard everything now I'm hearing about un-gusts? LOL!!What's so funny? Sailors have spoken of "non puffs" for years. It's a sudden, br ief, lull in an otherwise steady wind.-Dana -- Please let me know if you did not receive this. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Crow Hopping -- was WSullivan's accident
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 18, 2008
bransom(at)ucdavis.edu wrote: > Although it's as old as Seafoam discussions, I dare post my own opinion > again on "crow hopping". It's probably 10 years, so what the heck, here > it is. I am a proponent of them, in ultralights, if done after dual > training in a like aircraft. > > Crow hopping has two key pieces: Foremost is getting there in baby > steps. Second, keep a mindset of very minor throttle changes, whether > they be increase or decrease in rpm, and similarly, stay with minimal > stick pitch changes. And I'm talking dual here!! > > I had 4.5 hours of transition training in a 2-place phantom many years > ago. Most of that was crow hops, which started out as taxi, then fast > taxi, etc. By hour 3 I would go down the runway just at flying speed, > jockeying all 4 control inputs as needed. Important too, no wind until > I was pretty good at it. I did a lot of flight with wheels 0 to 2ft > AGL. No sudden moves, no surprises. Guess what, I got darn good at > controlling the plane in that configuration, even adding in wind. When > it came time to test fly my never before flown Firestar, I was confident > of being able to handle transition issues near the ground. > > I'm posting just for the record that there are at least some (or at > least one ;) ) who maintain that learning crow hopping properly is a > good thing. Flying at altitude -- that's a lot simpler, and should be > optional. > > -Ben/ KXP > > ps: All the best to you William -- get well soon. I'll add my .02 on crow-hopping, mostly because it deceptively gets pilots in trouble..... In my experience, the crow hop is actually a pretty advanced maneuver and one that requires pretty intimate familiarity with the plane, more so than simply blasting off and landing normally. So I think it should be done only after some time in normal flight modes in the plane has been accumulated. I'll never tell why I know this, so don't ask.... LS -------- LS FS II Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188542#188542 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 18, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Un-gusts
At 08:55 PM 6/18/2008, David Key wrote: >...Un-Gusts LOL!! I'm still cracking up.... OK, fine. "The airplane was flying just above stall speed when a brief lull in the otherwise steady wind put him below stall speed..." Simpler to call it, as sailors do, a "non puff" (as opposed to a puff). I called it an un gust because fliers don't use the term "puff" much. Doesn't matter what you call it, the phenomenon is real. -Dana -- When you get it right mighty beasts float up into the sky When you get it wrong people die -Roger Bacon (c1384) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Un-gusts
Date: Jun 18, 2008
I think the term is "wind shear". Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIC ----- Original Message ----- From: Dana Hague To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 9:43 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Un-gusts At 08:55 PM 6/18/2008, David Key wrote: ...Un-Gusts LOL!! I'm still cracking up.... OK, fine. "The airplane was flying just above stall speed when a brief lull in the otherwise steady wind put him below stall speed..." Simpler to call it, as sailors do, a "non puff" (as opposed to a puff). I called it an un gust because fliers don't use the term "puff" much. Doesn't matter what you call it, the phenomenon is real. -Dana -- When you get it right mighty beasts float up into the sky When you get it wrong people die -Roger Bacon (c1384) ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: William Sullivans Accident
From: "The BaronVonEvil" <grageda(at)innw.net>
Date: Jun 18, 2008
Hi All When most people think of wind gusts they think of a sudden rush of wind coming at them or flying into them head on. I believe what is meant by un-gust are actually just gust of wind that moves [In the same direction as the aircraft is traveling] (Sorry I don't know how to do italics). This would make it appear that the wind has slowed or stopped relative to the motion of the plane. I think when that happens, you loose lift and then start to sink until you A. Move out of the still air, (relative to the A/C) B.The plane accelerates back up above stall speed or C. Ends up on the ground. I always try and carry a safe margin of speed on approach until I'm just above the ground within safe bounce altitude and then bleed off airspeed until touch down. Should I encounter a 10 to 15 mph gust from behind, my airspeed should still be above stall speed and continue flying until the plane accelerates with the gust or flies out of it. Un-Gust is as good a name as any for a generic term for this type of wind effect. Just My $.02 Carlos G. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188550#188550 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 18, 2008
From: possums <possums(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: William Sullivans Accident
I remember wearing the brakes out on my CGS Hawk, taxing it up and down the runway (back in 1983) before I ever flew it. I did solo in a Cessna 150 after 4 hours and spent about 2 hours in a two-seat QuickSilver so I had some training. I can only see out of one eye, but I discovered that wasn't nearley the problem I though it would be. My fricking "Dealer" lived about 40 miles north of me and never could find the time to come look at the plane to see if it was built according to the plans. If you guys think "Kolb" plans have some deficiencies, you should have seen mine and if you think Kolbs are hard to build...I was not even sure if the wings were upside down or not. Anyway - he told me that if I would fly it up to his place, he would take a good look at it and make sure everything was OK. Back then, the Ultralight factories were going full bore, and the market was awash with new designs. And "knockoffs of new designs, and knockoffs of the knockoffs. Somebody would bring a new one up every two or three weeks, put it together & try to fly it the next day. There were plans with bicycle wheels for landing gear & worse - neat. So mine (being the state-of -the-art) looked pretty good. Back then, (state of the art) meant double surfaced wings, ailerons (not spoilers) and mine even had flaps!! All that being said, I had everyone at the airport help me go over the plane before it's first flight. I don't care who you are - that is always scary. They would find things like missing bolts, missing nuts, missing cotter pins ...etc. Things that would make the aircraft difficult or interesting to handle under any circumstances. If William would have been flying with us back then he would have fit right in. Just kidding. You just started 20 years too late William. BTW: I did get there, manage to land and get back. Cheated death again. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 18, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Un-gusts
At 10:02 PM 6/18/2008, Richard & Martha Neilsen wrote: >I think the term is "wind shear". I suppose that could apply, but I always thought of wind shear as applying when an aircraft flew from a mass of air steadily moving at one velocity to another steadily moving at another velocity, whereas an un-gust (or gust) is more a transient bit of turbulence moving along with the wind, such that it temporarily cancels (or reinforces) the mainstream wind. Put another way, a gust can be either positive or negative (or sideways, a sudden brief wind shift). I suppose I should've said "lull" instead... but I think of a "non puff" (or "un gust") as a particularly short and sharp edged lull. -Dana -- Press any key... no, no, no, NOT THAT ONE! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 18, 2008
From: possums <possums(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Un-gusts
I have to land on this postage stamp every time I fly (at least 1,400 landings here - so far). Only one way out and in. (Always land up hill) and we got trees at the north end anyway. I learned a long time ago that if I have a 10 mph headwind while landing, I add 10 mph to the landing speed because it's going to "ungust" or quit when I get below the trees. BUT I hate the south/tail winds the most. You still have to add speed to the landing so you don't have loose controls (that adds 10 mph for the wind & 10 mph for what you added - VGs are nice) . We are not allowed a "bounce" with downwind landings. These Kolbs are like a horse, you've got to have enough wind going over the surfaces to make it do what you want it to do. If you want that left wing up, you better have wind going over it to make it do what you want it to do. Called "Horsing it in". http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=263159682459782825&hl=en ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Un-gusts
From: "David Lucas" <d_a_lucas(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 19, 2008
Reminds me of a story of a young WWI pilot who crashed his Bi-Plane on Take-Off. The ensuing 'Inquiry' found him guilty of poor technique and both grounded and demoted him. His appeal's to his superiors established a review committee that quashed the initial finding and instead attributed the accident to attempting a take off in meteorological conditions when there was no 'lift' in the air. His demotion was canceled and he was restored to flying status forthwith. The review committee also took the opportunity of congratulating the pilot on the occasion of his engagement to the commanders daughter. (Nudge, nudge, wink, wink, say no more !) David. :-) Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188570#188570 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Russ Kinne <russ(at)rkiphoto.com>
Subject: Re: Un-gusts
Date: Jun 19, 2008
Wind shear is quite different! But can also cause an unexpected drop in airspeed do not archive On Jun 18, 2008, at 10:02 PM, Richard & Martha Neilsen wrote: > I think the term is "wind shear". > > Rick Neilsen > Redrive VW powered MKIIIC > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Dana Hague > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 9:43 PM > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Un-gusts > > At 08:55 PM 6/18/2008, David Key wrote: > >> ...Un-Gusts LOL!! I'm still cracking up.... > > OK, fine. "The airplane was flying just above stall speed when a > brief lull in the otherwise steady wind put him below stall > speed..." Simpler to call it, as sailors do, a "non puff" (as > opposed to a puff). I called it an un gust because fliers don't > use the term "puff" much. Doesn't matter what you call it, the > phenomenon is real. > > -Dana > > > -- > When you get it right > mighty beasts float up into the sky > When you get it wrong > people die > > -Roger Bacon (c1384) > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List">http:// > www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http:// > www.matronics.com/c > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 19, 2008
Subject: Bill Sullivan's Accident
From: edharvey1(at)juno.com
There may be an additional casualty in Bill's accident: town officials have advised us that they are reviewing the advisability of renewing our lease in view of our unsafe and irresponsible flying practices. We are finding it difficult to defend against charges that are essentially true. So it may be that the countless hours of effort over the past 5 years to convert this remote, decommissioned landfill into a viable, active ultralight airstrip may all be forfeited. We should know for sure in a few weeks. Ed Harvey Firefly038/447/IVO Silver Wings Ultralight Club Palmer. MA. ____________________________________________________________ Enter for Your Chance to WIN* The TotalBeauty.com Summer Spa Sweepstakes! http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/JKFkuJi7UfiLLTF1pBXrFC11loMrl7488ZqBHAz81BvS7fBk3em7dr/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: William Sullivans Accident
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 19, 2008
It is true about the gusts of wind, it is possible to be flying along and suddenly lose 10 MPH of airspeed due to a gust from behind, or suddenly loosing a gust that is coming from the front. If you are flying a slow approach within 10 MPH of stall speed, you will suddenly find yourself stalled very close to the ground. Downdraft's do not occur close to the ground unless there is some extraordinary circumstance like high wind next to a hanger, or a bad thunderstorm in the area... 10 MPH gusts are very common, even on a nice day. It is a good idea to keep approach speeds very high, especially in ultralight aircraft like the Kolbs. In a new type of airplane far different than he has ever flown before, without an airspeed indicator, William did not have much of a chance. Don't give up on Kolbs's William, they are pretty easy to fly with a little bit of instruction in this type of plane and an airspeed indicator !!! Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188589#188589 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Bill Sullivan's Accident
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 19, 2008
edharvey1(at)juno.com wrote: > > town > officials have advised us that they are reviewing the advisability of > renewing our lease in view of our unsafe and irresponsible flying > practices. We are finding it difficult to defend against charges that are > essentially true. > Ed Harvey > With that attitude you deserve to be closed down. Does one accident mean that you all are engaging in "unsafe and irresponsible flying practices" ? So next time some new driver crashes his car in down, you would say that people are driving recklessly and that streets should be blocked off to traffic ? So tell me when does one accident by a new pilot make this " Essentially True " as you have stated ? Ed, grow some balls and stand up for yourself. With statements like your just made here, is it any wonder they want to close you down ? Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188590#188590 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Carlos" <grageda(at)innw.net>
Subject: Re: Bill Sullivan's Accident
Date: Jun 19, 2008
Hi Ed, I suspect that until the accident, your airstrip was "Under the Radar" of those helpful folks who see every open space as a spot that needs a house on it. Now that it has been discovered it will be only a matter of time before some developer convinces the city fathers that here is a city revenue making opportunity by allowing the property to to sprout houses... and that it would eliminate any liabilities of a aircraft operation. So who do you think will win this argument? Sorry to hear about your situation, Carlos G. ----- Original Message ----- From: <edharvey1(at)juno.com> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 6:57 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Bill Sullivan's Accident > > There may be an additional casualty in Bill's accident: town > officials have advised us that they are reviewing the advisability of > renewing our lease in view of our unsafe and irresponsible flying > practices. We are finding it difficult to defend against charges that are > essentially true. > So it may be that the countless hours of effort over the past 5 > years to convert this remote, decommissioned landfill into a viable, > active ultralight airstrip may all be forfeited. We should know for sure > in a few weeks. > > Ed Harvey > Firefly038/447/IVO > Silver Wings Ultralight Club > Palmer. MA. > > ____________________________________________________________ > Enter for Your Chance to WIN* > The TotalBeauty.com Summer Spa Sweepstakes! > http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/JKFkuJi7UfiLLTF1pBXrFC11loMrl7488ZqBHAz81BvS7fBk3em7dr/ > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: LEE CREECH <dcreech3(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: William Sullivans Accident
Date: Jun 19, 2008
Good point Dana makes about slow airplanes -- I think the implication is th at the oft-cited "1.3 times stall speed" rule of thumb for approach speed m ay not be enough, since that point-three margin is not very many MPH when y ou stall at 35! Regarding the "low inertia of such a light plane", though -- I would have t hought that's an asset rather than a liability in that situation, since it allows the plane to accelerate more quickly to regain the airspeed that's l ost when an "un-gust" or decreasing headwind is encountered. Wrong? Regards to all, Lee Firestar II Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:27:45 -0400To: kolb-list(at)matronics.comFrom: d-m-h ague(at)comcast.netSubject: Re: Kolb-List: William Sullivans AccidentBill,Firs t, I'm glad you're OK (more or less). Bad as it was, it could have been a lot worse!Unless you're in rotor behind obstacles, you won't find downdraft s at 15'. What you _will_ find is gusts or "un gusts", which can quickly r educe your airspeed from something above stall to below stall... and you dr op. This may have been what happened. I the aircraft you previously flew, the higher stall speed means such an effect is a smaller percentage of the stall speed, so it's less likely to be a problem. However, if you're appr oaching at 35 mph in an airplane that stalls at 30, and you get a 10 mph un -gust... well, you get the picture. Add to this the inoperative ASI, the t endency of the plane to pitch up when you reduce power and the low inertia of such a light plane, and it's even worse. That's why in an ultralight yo u don't just "fly the plane to the ground", but (to the perspective of a pi lot with GA experience) you literally DIVE the plane at the runway.Anyway, I hope you recover soon, and get to work rebuilding or shopping for another or whatever makes sense, so we can fly together.-Dana _________________________________________________________________ The i=92m Talkathon starts 6/24/08.- For now, give amongst yourselves. http://www.imtalkathon.com?source=TXT_EML_WLH_LearnMore_GiveAmongst ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: William Sullivans Accident
From: "Ralph B" <ul15rhb(at)juno.com>
Date: Jun 19, 2008
After flying a Firestar for 21 years, a smooth landing can be accomplished every time by actually diving the plane toward the runway. I use a 60 mph approach speed at about 3500 RPM. This sounds hot and it is, but remember that a Firestar is light with a lot of drag that dissipates quickly. Cut the power just before touchdown (novices should keep the power on until the aircraft is on the ground and rolling). There is a technique to it and it takes practice. After flying the Kolbra (591 lbs) for a few hours, I don't need to dive the plane down as it has a lot more weight and inertia. The Firestar needs that airspeed to punch through wind gusts and lifting thermals. Bill Sullivan was the victim of a lack of airspeed. Without experience and no ASI he was setup for failure. The Kolbs are one the safest aircraft to fly, but it takes some good training and practice to make a good landing. Ralph -------- Ralph B Original Firestar 447 N91493 E-AB 21 years flying it Kolbra 912UL N20386 0 years flying it Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188604#188604 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Crow Hopping -- was WSullivan's accident
From: "Ralph B" <ul15rhb(at)juno.com>
Date: Jun 19, 2008
We all have opinions on crow-hopping when learning to fly. I agree with Lucien as it's a setup for a crash. The problem is that a Kolb will hop into the air too quickly and catch the pilot by surprise. When this happens, the pilot cuts the throttle, stalls the plane, and down she goes very hard. This is classic and I have heard many a Kolb pilot hurt or crash their planes this way. Once I test flew an Ultrastar for a guy. After I was done with it, I told him that if he got into the air, to give it throttle and go for it. He took off and chopped the throttle (just what I told him not to do). I witnessed an accident that day. He wasn't hurt, but the Ultrastar was. Ralph -------- Ralph B Original Firestar 447 N91493 E-AB 21 years flying it Kolbra 912UL N20386 0 years flying it Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188607#188607 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Crow Hopping
Date: Jun 19, 2008
Ben Its almost always good to to hear from you. On this subject again I disagree. I have been flying my VW powered MKIIIC for ten+ years and apparently not as skilled a pilot as you. Last year when I got my newest reduction drive I wanted to test it without actually committing aviation so I decided to crow hop. I had tied the plane down and did a full power run up but. My strip is only 1400 ft so gentle power changes would not get me airborne AND stopped by the end of the strip. I was shocked. I would full power run up to flying speed then pull power back with the intent of flying a few feet off the ground. Wow. I pride myself on balancing power down pitch down power up pitch up in the air but a few feet off the ground the skill level needs to be very very high. I only did this a few times before I decided that this was much more dangerous than just flying this preproduction redrive. I noticed that you practiced crow hops in a Two place Phantom. For those that aren't familiar with it I will note that it is tractor configuration. I have never flown one but I suspect that it is much more docile in the crow hop maneuver. I agree that if a crow hop is done power changes should be made VERY minor. Also on a 5,000 to 10000 foot grass strip where a new pilot will not feel rushed. Remember your are recommending this to a new pilot. Gentle on the controls will come with time. Again I recommend that crow hops should never be done is a Kolb. A Kolb is a very good airplane but like all airplanes there are some things that you shouldn't do and this is one of them. I do agree that learning balanced usage of the controls is a very good thing but not close to the ground where you have no room for error. Its somewhat like learning to drive a car on ice. My dad took me to a big open parking lot where there was plenty of room for error. Crow hopping is like learning ice driving on a crowded city street. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIC ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ben Ransom" <bransom(at)ucdavis.edu> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 7:54 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Crow Hopping -- was WSullivan's accident > > Although it's as old as Seafoam discussions, I dare post my own opinion > again on "crow hopping". It's probably 10 years, so what the heck, here > it is. I am a proponent of them, in ultralights, if done after dual > training in a like aircraft. > > Crow hopping has two key pieces: Foremost is getting there in baby steps. > Second, keep a mindset of very minor throttle changes, whether they be > increase or decrease in rpm, and similarly, stay with minimal stick pitch > changes. And I'm talking dual here!! > > I had 4.5 hours of transition training in a 2-place phantom many years > ago. Most of that was crow hops, which started out as taxi, then fast > taxi, etc. By hour 3 I would go down the runway just at flying speed, > jockeying all 4 control inputs as needed. Important too, no wind until I > was pretty good at it. I did a lot of flight with wheels 0 to 2ft AGL. No > sudden moves, no surprises. Guess what, I got darn good at controlling > the plane in that configuration, even adding in wind. When it came time > to test fly my never before flown Firestar, I was confident of being able > to handle transition issues near the ground. > I'm posting just for the record that there are at least some (or at least > one ;) ) who maintain that learning crow hopping properly is a good > thing. Flying at altitude -- that's a lot simpler, and should be > optional. > > -Ben/ KXP > > ps: All the best to you William -- get well soon. > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: William Sullivans Accident
Date: Jun 19, 2008
My MkIII is just as fat and heavy with the resultant inertia. Carrying power all the way in is enticing because it is easier. I do it myself but actually, cutting power out on long final or even the end of downwind is really good practice. It makes you more aware of wind and rate of descent. BB still windy, car painting. On 19, Jun 2008, at 11:56 AM, Ralph B wrote: > > After flying a Firestar for 21 years, a smooth landing can be > accomplished every time by actually diving the plane toward the > runway. I use a 60 mph approach speed at about 3500 RPM. This > sounds hot and it is, but remember that a Firestar is light with a > lot of drag that dissipates quickly. Cut the power just before > touchdown (novices should keep the power on until the aircraft is > on the ground and rolling). There is a technique to it and it takes > practice. After flying the Kolbra (591 lbs) for a few hours, I > don't need to dive the plane down as it has a lot more weight and > inertia. The Firestar needs that airspeed to punch through wind > gusts and lifting thermals. Bill Sullivan was the victim of a lack > of airspeed. Without experience and no ASI he was setup for > failure. The Kolbs are one the safest aircraft to fly, but it takes > some good training and practice to make a good landing. > > Ralph > > -------- > Ralph B > Original Firestar 447 > N91493 E-AB > 21 years flying it > Kolbra 912UL > N20386 > 0 years flying it > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188604#188604 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Bill Sullivan's Accident
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 19, 2008
I am not jumping on Bill Sullivan or any of their friends, I am jumping on ONE GUY - Ed Harvey, and it is well deserved. Making a statement like Ed Harvey did: " We are finding it difficult to defend against charges that are essentially true. " Is nothing short of asking to have your field closed down. The fact that a a new guy got into an accident is nothing new, it happens all the time in any sport... To go around saying that the accusations of " Unsafe and irresponsible flying practices are essentially true " is nothing short short of asking for the land to be taken away... So Russ, this is exactly the time to be jumping all over Ed, before starts making statements like this in more public places. My post is directed at ONE GUY not the rest of the group as you so incorrectly stated. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188632#188632 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: William Sullivans Accident
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jun 19, 2008
My Mark III weights 425# empty. All of our landings are done at idle from the base leg to touchdown. I only add power if I am coming up short or wind interferes. My indicated stall is 46mph my normal approach is 65mph or about 1.4X stall. In rough air with plenty or rotor at the end of the runway I have pushed 70 and 75mph on the approach to cut through the crap. It seems to work fine. All of my training has involved making approaches and landings at idle. The Mk III actually floats down the runway a fair distance before touching the tail wheel 1stwith the 65mph approach. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188664#188664 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 19, 2008
From: Dudley <airspeedx3(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Doing it the proper way!!
> You'll need a Private or sport... - - Got it!! - > You'll need Airworthiness - Working on it...got the paperwork! - > He'll have gone over your Weight and Balance... And he'll tell you he wan ts it in the FRONT 51% of the CG RANGE ( Better recovery ) - Yup!! -> You'll need a Tailwheel endorsement ( Around 10 hrs ) - Okay. - > Then , Last but not least , you'll need 5 hrs in a "LIKE" aircraft ( vari es ) - Can we log this simultaneous in the "Tailwheel endorsement plane"? - > I SWEAR .... If you do all of this , You will have NO PROBLEM > flying your plane.... ( Just give it extra Left Rudder on take-off ) As it should be!!!!- Good advice.- I shall follow it.-- Mike Welch > Gotta Fly... > Mike & "Jaz" in MN =0A=0A=0A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "William and/or Justina Fyfe" <wjfyfe(at)att.net>
Subject: Information on Mark III and Kolbra
Date: Jun 19, 2008
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 19, 2008
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Randolph County Airport Fly-in Newspaper Article
Kolbers, I was interviewed for the local newpaper during the fly-in. The article came out today. I asked for an email copy of it and I put it up at: http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly141.html I thought you may enjoy it. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 19, 2008
From: gary aman <gaman(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Un-gusts
Possum, We could start a new thread here ( and leave William alone for a while) .I'll start it with; :you call that a postage stamp?I've seen aircraft carriers smaller than that! ----- Original Message ---- From: possums <possums(at)bellsouth.net> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 11:55:53 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Un-gusts I have to land on this postage stamp every time I fly (at least 1,400 landings here - so far). Only one way out and in. (Always land up hill) and we got trees at the north end anyway. I learned a long time ago that if I have a 10 mph headwind while landing, I add 10 mph to the landing speed because it's going to "ungust" or quit when I get below the trees. BUT I hate the south/tail winds the most. You still have to add speed to the landing so you don't have loose controls (that adds 10 mph for the wind & 10 mph for what you added - VGs are nice) . We are not allowed a "bounce" with downwind landings. These Kolbs are like a horse, you've got to have enough wind going over the surfaces to make it do what you want it to do. If you want that left wing up, you better have wind going over it to make it do what you want it to do. Called "Horsing it in". http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=263159682459782825&hl=en ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: One less hurdle
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)juno.com>
Date: Jun 19, 2008
Thanks Rick, I received my Kolb training from Jim Kmet, an experienced Kolb pilot and an excellent CFI. Since he signed me off, I AM flying off some of my required solo hours in my Kolb. I find learning about and becoming very familiar with every available resource, even if it is "old-fashioned", is well worth it. It's good to have a back-up. (You never know when some crazy country will decide to blow up our GPS satellites, right? - wouldn't that cripple a lot of people...not just pilots.) I can use and operate my husband's GPS. It is a small one and doesn't have many features but it would tell me what direction I'm flying and where I've been. I will learn more advanced GPS when I can afford to buy one. My current instructor is training me in a 1977 Cessna 150. I began learning to fly with just the intention of going up and seeing the view, which my Kolb serves that purpose, but I'm not ruling out the possibility of one day renting a Cessna and taking a little trip or taking up a few friends and family. My Mark II will only take a 200 lb passenger (I have many family and friends larger than that) and even then the passenger seat is very small and cramped such that even a 160 lb passenger might be uncomfortable. After I had some Kolb training, but before I got my sign off some older pilots hanging around the airport urged me to fast taxi or do crow hops, but luckily one of my mentors there said, "That is too dangerous" and proceeded to explain why. The others would have had me believe that fast taxiing or crow hopping (without further training) would be a good thing. I suppose those are the same type of people who would throw me in a pool saying, "Sink or swim". Isn't that what they used to do in the "old days"? Hindsight is much easier than foresight and it's easy for people to say, "You shouldn't have done that...that was too dangerous." It might even be the same people who told you to do it! Sometimes an action can seem very logical and practical at the time and unless you have someone around who has been there...done that or perhaps even heard about the dangers of doing something, you may very well do something dangerous and sometimes you may make it through ok, and sometimes not. I just pray that I'll always have someone around who's "been there, done that" and that I'll have the ears to listen. Thanks, Cristal Waters Kolb Mark II NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net wrote: > Cristal > > It's great to hear about getting your pilots license. It's a lot of work. > Today we hear of to many that are continuing to fly illegally without a > license. And a few that try to fly with almost no training and hurt them > selves. Keep us informed of your progress. > > I wonder about your instructor wanting you to practice ADF and VORs. It > surprises me that these instruments are still in airplanes. Are you getting > GPS training or glass cockpits? I suppose you still had to learn to decode > weather briefings for your written. Check out Pilot-Mycast for your cell > phone. There is everything you can get from a weather briefer direct, > graphic and decoded. > > Also are you able to get flight training in something closer to a Kolb. Are > you going to fly off some of your hours in your Kolb? Be real careful > letting a GA instructor fly your plane or instruct in it. Pilots used to the > big heavies don't do well in a Kolb. The CFI instructor for Old Kolb told me > his most difficult students were long time GA pilots and instructors. > > Rick Neilsen > Redrive VW powered MKIIIC > > > --- -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188700#188700 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 19, 2008
From: gary aman <gaman(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: William Sullivans Accident
Grant, My MK-3 weighs 623 empty and stalls below 30 (with vg's) and just me 170# in it.I'd almost bet you have some error in your indicated airspeed.65 is my economy cruise speed! ----- Original Message ---- From: grantr <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 4:28:10 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: William Sullivans Accident My Mark III weights 425# empty. All of our landings are done at idle from the base leg to touchdown. I only add power if I am coming up short or wind interferes. My indicated stall is 46mph my normal approach is 65mph or about 1.4X stall. In rough air with plenty or rotor at the end of the runway I have pushed 70 and 75mph on the approach to cut through the crap. It seems to work fine. All of my training has involved making approaches and landings at idle. The Mk III actually floats down the runway a fair distance before touching the tail wheel 1stwith the 65mph approach. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188664#188664 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Randolph County Airport Fly-in Newspaper Article
Date: Jun 20, 2008
<> Now there is a guy who is really switched on! Falling out of my airplane... well.. wonder why I never thought of that. .<< So he got a better seatbelt to replace the racing buckle he first had. He saw just what he needed at Toys R Us,>> So he went to the shop and bought a safety harness that was rated to stop a 5 year old child from going through the windshield at 30 mph. I hope it never has to stop a full grown man from being thrown out of his plane at 70 mph when it hits a tree The best bit was that the plane `was made of Dacron`. Great !. Just like an umbrella with no frame. Presumably you can roll it up in a ball and put it in your pocket. Cripes. I said in my post that all reporters write b********s. Even when you carefully explain everything they will write it up full of mistakes. Worse they may have an agenda of their own .We were unfortunate to have a light aircraft written off at a local strip I sometimes use. The pilot missed the strip, tried to put it down in an adjacent field and rolled it into a ball. Reporters, newspaper and TV, descended on the site and proceeded to question everyone in the area. The main thrust of all their questions was " Doesn`t it scare you with these little planes flying overhead all the time" All they wanted to do was dump on someone, get the locals to complain about the noise etc.,. Luckily we are very close, actually within the MATZ, of Lyneham which operates the largest fleet of C130 outside the States. All the neighbors said that the C130`s were much more of a problem than the planes operating out of this little strip. You gotta watch the press. Even if you write the report yourself they will edit it so that it reads wrongly. We are all enthusiastic about our sport and like to spread the word and its a bit of an ego boost to have your name attached to a report. However, over the years I have come to believe that we are best served by keeping our heads down and keeping the media out of the picture if we possible can. If you want to spread the word talk to your friends NOT the press. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ted Cowan" <tc1917(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: reviews
Date: Jun 20, 2008
Just got my bi-annual review a couple of days ago. Wow, it was a lot better than the original performance examination. This was relaxed and fun. I went to Wetumpka, Al, Airport and utilized the services of Tommy Ussery. He has a J-3. Being as I already have a tail dragger permit (took my exam in one so it is instant), the J-3 fit the bill. This evaluation is supposed to be informative and instructive at the same time. Tommy did a wonderful job. Being as I am not used to his plane, he took the time to 'show' me exactly what he wanted me to accomplish and I did it. No big surprises, no nerve racking questions or tricks. The big ole J-3 does not perform as my Kolb Sling Shot but nothing does!! I can see where for the most part, the J-3 would be a good trainer plane for a Kolb driver except a whole lot more rudder is required (which is good training). It landed pretty much the same (3-point stall). I am good for two more years now. Gotta mention, we had a cross wind on asphault and not once did we experience an un-gust! I have heard a lot of excuses in my time but this is rediculous. I am self taught all the way until Sport Pilot so I gotta tell you, the crow hop is about the only way a person can learn his plane and get good enough on the controls hopefully not to kill yourself. If you do taxi too fast you do have the problem of backing off power (the kolb wants to fly at that point) but if you push it over a little, you can control it fine. I think personally, you need to just relax and let your hands do the walking and shut off your brain. If you think too hard about what you are going to do, you wont do it right. You need to relax and let your intuition do it for you. your instincs will work if you let them. works that way for RC too. Dont think about what you are about to do, just do it. I am amased though, with some humans, walking is about as proficient as they are ever going to get. "You can teach a Monkey to fly better than that" but you cannot get them to pack a parachute. Sorry if I insulted anyone. Just keep practicing until using the rudder is natural and you dont have to THINK about it. That is the key. Ted Cowan, Alabama ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Bill Sullivan's Accident
Date: Jun 20, 2008
Making a statement like Ed Harvey did: " We are finding it difficult to defend against charges that are essentially true. " >> I agree. That looked like an invitation to be closed down. What sort of a set up are they running there when they agree that unsound practices are the norm? I think that if I was learning to fly with an outfit like that I would find somewhere else, pronto. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: William Sullivans Accident
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jun 20, 2008
Gaman, This is with me an my instructor so 317# total. Yes I think my asi is off about 10mph fast. I plan to check it with the gps method. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188741#188741 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 20, 2008
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: Randolph County Airport Fly-in Newspaper Article
> >You gotta watch the press. Even if you write the report yourself they will >edit it so that it reads wrongly. > >We are all enthusiastic about our sport and like to spread the word and its >a bit of an ego boost to have your name attached to a report. However, over >the years I have come to believe that we are best served by keeping our >heads down and keeping the media out of the picture if we possible can. If >you want to spread the word talk to your friends NOT the press. > Pat, At my age ego has nothing to do with it. This is a rural area, and just about everyone knows everyone else. The New Gazette is a small local newspaper that reports everything that happens in the county. If I had refused to talk to the reporter, it would have been in the paper "Jack Hart refuses to talk about ultra-light" Ms. Aukerman, locally, is well known for "not getting it right". I was pleasantly surprised about how well she did do with the article. In questioning her, I found she hates flying, but she is a word smith and wrote an article that makes sense to her and most of the other people in the county. Those who fly will get a chuckle about what she wrote. Those who do not fly will find it interesting from the normal fare of county, town, farm, and weather news. We must not feel superior because we can fly. We should feel compassion for those who have never had the experience. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 20, 2008
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: re: William Sullivan accident
Kolbers: I am back home, and have not read the mail yet. My wife tells me you have all been asking about me, and thank you for your best wishes. More later on me and the incident later, but would somebody pleas forward the following: Dear Homer Kolb- I am sorry to say that I recently bent one of your fine aircraft, and I sincerely apologize. Thank you for the fine design- it worked exactly as intended, and the cage design protected me from any major injuries whatsoever. I will give details later, but the take-off was totally unintentional, and the hard landing was apparently a tailwind induced stall from a few feet up followed by a cartwheel. When my wife released the seatbelt, I got up and walked away from it. A very few cuts and bruises, and a couple of cracked bones (minor). I will save this one for parts, and will soon purchase another. Thank you again Bill Sullivan ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 20, 2008
From: Ben Ransom <bransom(at)ucdavis.edu>
Subject: Re: Crow Hopping
Rick I'm fine if there is disagreement on the merit of crow hopping. Just wanted to get my $.02 in on it. It worked awfully well for me and I'm grateful for having learned that way. I still enjoy riding along a landing strip barely at flying speed and playing the controls. WRT Phantom, although a tractor, it is still a high drag, low inertia plane, and sinks quick when power chopped and two aboard. Makes sense there is less pitch change due to throttle as you say. Can't remember that well! :) BTW, when my UL instructor and I felt I was dialed in, I got in a Quicksilver MX to solo. I also wrote him a check for $5k to cover anything other than 'happy landings'. How's that for self insured? Good times. Cheers, -Ben Richard & Martha Neilsen wrote: > > > Ben > > Its almost always good to to hear from you. On this subject again I > disagree. > > I have been flying my VW powered MKIIIC for ten+ years and apparently > not as skilled a pilot as you. Last year when I got my newest > reduction drive I wanted to test it without actually committing > aviation so I decided to crow hop. I had tied the plane down and did a > full power run up but. My strip is only 1400 ft so gentle power > changes would not get me airborne AND stopped by the end of the strip. > I was shocked. I would full power run up to flying speed then pull > power back with the intent of flying a few feet off the ground. Wow. I > pride myself on balancing power down pitch down power up pitch up in > the air but a few feet off the ground the skill level needs to be very > very high. I only did this a few times before I decided that this was > much more dangerous than just flying this preproduction redrive. > > I noticed that you practiced crow hops in a Two place Phantom. For > those that aren't familiar with it I will note that it is tractor > configuration. I have never flown one but I suspect that it is much > more docile in the crow hop maneuver. I agree that if a crow hop is > done power changes should be made VERY minor. Also on a 5,000 to 10000 > foot grass strip where a new pilot will not feel rushed. Remember your > are recommending this to a new pilot. Gentle on the controls will come > with time. > > Again I recommend that crow hops should never be done is a Kolb. A > Kolb is a very good airplane but like all airplanes there are some > things that you shouldn't do and this is one of them. I do agree that > learning balanced usage of the controls is a very good thing but not > close to the ground where you have no room for error. Its somewhat > like learning to drive a car on ice. My dad took me to a big open > parking lot where there was plenty of room for error. Crow hopping is > like learning ice driving on a crowded city street. > > Rick Neilsen > Redrive VW powered MKIIIC > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ben Ransom" <bransom(at)ucdavis.edu> > To: > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 7:54 PM > Subject: Kolb-List: Crow Hopping -- was WSullivan's accident > > >> >> Although it's as old as Seafoam discussions, I dare post my own >> opinion again on "crow hopping". It's probably 10 years, so what the >> heck, here it is. I am a proponent of them, in ultralights, if done >> after dual training in a like aircraft. >> >> Crow hopping has two key pieces: Foremost is getting there in baby >> steps. Second, keep a mindset of very minor throttle changes, whether >> they be increase or decrease in rpm, and similarly, stay with minimal >> stick pitch changes. And I'm talking dual here!! >> >> I had 4.5 hours of transition training in a 2-place phantom many >> years ago. Most of that was crow hops, which started out as taxi, >> then fast taxi, etc. By hour 3 I would go down the runway just at >> flying speed, jockeying all 4 control inputs as needed. Important >> too, no wind until I was pretty good at it. I did a lot of flight >> with wheels 0 to 2ft AGL. No sudden moves, no surprises. Guess >> what, I got darn good at controlling the plane in that configuration, >> even adding in wind. When it came time to test fly my never before >> flown Firestar, I was confident of being able to handle transition >> issues near the ground. >> I'm posting just for the record that there are at least some (or at >> least one ;) ) who maintain that learning crow hopping properly is a >> good thing. Flying at altitude -- that's a lot simpler, and should >> be optional. >> >> -Ben/ KXP >> >> ps: All the best to you William -- get well soon. >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jerry Jones <maderah2(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Randolph County Airport Fly-in Newspaper Article
Date: Jun 20, 2008
Jack, I enjoyed "your" article, but it piqued my interest. What Italian engine are you using, and what has been your experience with it, performance and reliability? Also, what is the third engine and of course why. Thanks again, Jerry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 20, 2008
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: Randolph County Airport Fly-in Newspaper Article
> >Jack, > >I enjoyed "your" article, but it piqued my interest. What Italian >engine are you using, and what has been your experience with it, >performance and reliability? Also, what is the third engine and of >course why. > Jerry, I have 161 hours on a Simonini Victor 1+, 382 cc, one cylinder, water cooled, reed valve engine with dual ignition and electric start. Although they say it is more powerful than the Rotax 447, I do not believe this to be the case. It burns 1.5 to 1.0 gph less than the Rotax 447 on my FireFly. It is one sweet engine. If you would like more info on the engine, it can be found at: http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly.html - and: http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/fireflyindex.html The reason for changing to a lower hp third engine, is to reduce fuel consumption, drag, and overall weight. I will give up some climb rate, but by going down in hp and weight, I can fare in more things and reduce drag and still cruise just as fast. Since I have moved to east central Indiana, the winters are more severe, and I would like to fly with a full enclosure and remain 103-7 compliant. I purchased an MZ34 engine three + years ago, and then got involved with moving etc. I took it out of storage a couple of months ago and am trying to get the muffler mounted. It will hang inverted off the rear of the fuselage. No propeller extension will be required. Using electric start, and discarding the pull start, it should lower empty weight by 40 to 50 pounds. This engine is air cooled reed valve engine of 27 hp. In general, reed valve engines are smoother running and use less fuel than piston ported engines. The big problem is carburetion and getting the Bing tuned for your engine aircraft set up. If you have any additional questions please let me know. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Randolph County Airport Fly-in Newspaper Article
Date: Jun 20, 2008
We must not feel superior because we can fly. We should feel compassion for those who have never had the experience.>> Nicely put Jack. As far as the egotrip is concerned. I don`t think age has much to do with.it. I shall be 79 in August and I must confess to a little frisson of pleasure when an article or a letter which I have written is good enough to be published. When I bust my leg hang gliding, not an unusual occurence in the sport, the local press made their usual rubbish write up of it. While I was laid up with my leg in plaster I wrote my own account for Sailplane and Gliding, the main gliding magazine here It so happened that I turned up at my next Rotary Club meeting to be met with "The speaker has not turned up, can you talk about your crash" `Crash` you will note , not `accident`. Of course I was lucky. I had the article which I had just written clear in my head. I also had a plaster cast on and was using crutches. Therefore I found myself holding forth on how safe the sport was while surrounded by the evidence that it obviously was not. The talk went well and by chance there were several Rotarians from other Rotary Clubs in the audience. In due time they reported to their Clubs that they had enjoyed my talk and as Rotary Clubs are always short of speakers invitations to speak at other Clubs rolled in. In the end I think I did about 20 or so repeat performances, and didn`t have to buy a dinner for ages. By the time of the last talk of course the crutches were gone and the plaster cast but I learned the usefulness of using props when speaking to a crowd. Sailplane and Gliding also deemed my article worthy of publication and that produced a few comments in the letter columns from readers worldwide. Its an ill wind etc.. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jerry Jones <maderah2(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Randolph County Airport Fly-in Newspaper Article
Date: Jun 20, 2008
Jack, Thank you for your informative reply and the links to your web site. It has the best analysis of anything I've seen. Jerry On Jun 20, 2008, at 11:47 AM, Jack B. Hart wrote: > > >> >> Jack, >> >> I enjoyed "your" article, but it piqued my interest. What Italian >> engine are you using, and what has been your experience with it, >> performance and reliability? Also, what is the third engine and of >> course why. >> > > Jerry, > > I have 161 hours on a Simonini Victor 1+, 382 cc, one cylinder, water > cooled, reed valve engine with dual ignition and electric start. > Although > they say it is more powerful than the Rotax 447, I do not believe > this to be > the case. It burns 1.5 to 1.0 gph less than the Rotax 447 on my > FireFly. > It is one sweet engine. If you would like more info on the engine, > it can > be found at: > > http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly.html - and: > http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/fireflyindex.html > > The reason for changing to a lower hp third engine, is to reduce fuel > consumption, drag, and overall weight. I will give up some climb > rate, but > by going down in hp and weight, I can fare in more things and > reduce drag > and still cruise just as fast. Since I have moved to east central > Indiana, > the winters are more severe, and I would like to fly with a full > enclosure > and remain 103-7 compliant. I purchased an MZ34 engine three + > years ago, > and then got involved with moving etc. I took it out of storage a > couple of > months ago and am trying to get the muffler mounted. It will hang > inverted > off the rear of the fuselage. No propeller extension will be > required. > Using electric start, and discarding the pull start, it should > lower empty > weight by 40 to 50 pounds. This engine is air cooled reed valve > engine of > 27 hp. > > In general, reed valve engines are smoother running and use less > fuel than > piston ported engines. The big problem is carburetion and getting > the Bing > tuned for your engine aircraft set up. > > If you have any additional questions please let me know. > > Jack B. Hart FF004 > Winchester, IN > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 20, 2008
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: The logical order of things
> > >Fellow and future Kolb pilots, > > While we are still on the "crow hopping" subject, this my advice on the correct order of doing them. Mike, Will you let someone else make the first flights in your plane to check it out for trim? If you are to be the pilot on the original flight, it may be of value to add some training experience on how to fly a poorly trimmed aircraft from takeoff to landing, or during crow hopping. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mike Welch <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: The logical order of things
Date: Jun 20, 2008
> Mike, > > Will you let someone else make the first flights in your plane to check it > out for trim? If you are to be the pilot on the original flight, it may be > of value to add some training experience on how to fly a poorly trimmed > aircraft from takeoff to landing, or during crow hopping. > > Jack B. Hart FF004 > Winchester, IN Jack, Seeing as how I am building it, I just naturally assumed it would fly perfect, the first time!! Just kidding!!!!!!! ha ha ha Remember. I ASSUME NOTHING..... anymore!! Absolutely yes, I'd be happy to have an experienced (Kolb) pilot do the maiden flight. It will be as close to "operationally fit" as I can make it. This is why I've gone to great lengths to make sure the all the "angles of incidences" are all correct. (main wings, hor. stab, etc.) Maybe I could get you to come down to the Lake of the Ozarks, and give it a "once around the patch". Mike Welch MkIII _________________________________________________________________ Introducing Live Search cashback . It's search that pays you back! http://search.live.com/cashback/?&pkw=form=MIJAAF/publ=HMTGL/crea=introsrchcashback ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mike Welch <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: The logical order of things
Date: Jun 20, 2008
> Anyone know what the life expectancy of a crow is anyhow?? > > Jim Providing he doesn't do something incredibly really dumb, such as act like a human, he's probably gonna' rack up about 50 years. Mike W _________________________________________________________________ Need to know now? Get instant answers with Windows Live Messenger. http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/connect_your_way.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_messenger_062008 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 21, 2008
Subject: Bill's Accident
From: edharvey1(at)juno.com
Apparently my previous posting was so poorly worded that it left the impression that we generally operate in a dangerous and irresponsible manner. This is not the case. There has been only one instance that might be so described and that was Bill's recent unintended flight. It was to this flight only that I was referring when I said it was difficult to defend. The only other incident in our history occurred 2 years ago when a fuel pump failure on takeoff resulted in an off field landing with no injuries and minor damage. This is not a record of dangerous and irresponsible flying practices. We are not sitting on our hands waiting for the ax to fall and are actively negotiating with the town. Only this one incident has been cited against us and one incident does not constitute a practice. Ed Harvey Firefly/447/IVO Palmer, MA ____________________________________________________________ Click to find great rates on home insurance, save big, shop here. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/Ioyw6i3m3GBL2oII4dy1MWd9pUHDONY0z0o6ZpD8lgcflTWrgk0W8t/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: You have received photos from Adobe Photoshop Album Starter
Edition 3.0
Date: Jun 21, 2008
Hi All, dont know if this is going to work but here is an example of a crop circle in a field locally. Some people think it is the work of aliens(it appeared overnight) but I think it more likely to be the local Young Farmers Union, or the pub darts team. It supposed to represent the numbers in pi but it is complicated to explain. We had some Mandelbrot and Julian Equations last year. The things I can see from my Kolb. Cheers Pat The sender has included tags, so you can do more with these photos. Download Photoshop (R) Album Starter Edition-Free! http://www.adobe.com/aboutstarteredition ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: One less hurdle
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 21, 2008
NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net wrote: > Jim > > It is so great that we have such talent in our group. Thanks for responding. > > The point I was trying to make is that there is so much to learn that to > teach VORs and ADFs is really a waste. This equipment is expensive and > inaccurate. No one in there right mind would even spend the money to repair > one > if it quit working when they could purchase a GPS for less money and get so > much more. Its not just navigation accuracy its also the wealth of > information at your fingertips. It would seem that pilot training should > teach for the current and future not some antiquated equipment that should > be phased out. > Don't mean to barge in on this thread but I don't really understand the animosity towards VOR's that seems to have cropped up recently. It's actually not "inaccurate", true it does take some skill to learn to use it at first, but after that you really appreciate its simplicity and reliability. The debate about GPS is contentious and has been going on for quite a while now. The key point being whether to start using it as the _sole_ means of navigation (rather than as just one means among several). That appears to be part of what's behind the effort to eliminate things like VOR's. Just teach how to use a GPS and then no need to learn all this other "outdated" technology. I may be kinda old-school, but I think that's a ridiculous (and dangerous) idea for a variety of reasons that I won't go into here (unless we want a GPS vs other navigation methods thread). In small planes like ours, of course, GPS tends to be a lot more practical, for size and cost reasons usually. But truth is, if I could fit a decent King VOR in my titan I'd do it in a heartbeat (the one in my A22 barely works). Or heck, any of you guys throwing away your old VOR's, give it to me. I'll _make_ the sucker fit..... As for the ILS, I don't recall too many ILS's that require an ADF. Many require DME, but I've seen some you can shoot with just a VOR and a LOC/GS. LS -------- LS FS II Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188900#188900 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: You have received photos from Adobe Photoshop Album Starter
Edition 3.0
Date: Jun 21, 2008
Patrick: What altitude were you when you took this photo from your Kolb? john h mkIII The things I can see from my Kolb. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff
Date: Jun 21, 2008
Lucien Hey join in. When I got my private ticket all there was for electronic navigation was VORs and ADFs. Later I joined a flying club with three planes that all had dual VORs with DME and a ADF. Believe me I used them and I was good at it. At the time it was super. But the GPS offers so much more for less. At best a VOR will give you a radial off a point and maybe a distance if it has DME but Exactly where are you? The further you are from a VOR the worse it gets. A GPS gives you a graphic and says you are right here. I'm not saying just teach GPS also teach compass and clock (real navigation) for when the power goes out. When I was working in the computer field I had to drag slide rules and type writers out of peoples hands all the time. Some people are never comfortable with anything new. You wouldn't believe the battles to get some people to use E-Mail. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIC ----- Original Message ----- From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 11:40 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: One less hurdle > > > NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net wrote: >> Jim >> >> It is so great that we have such talent in our group. Thanks for >> responding. >> >> The point I was trying to make is that there is so much to learn that to >> teach VORs and ADFs is really a waste. This equipment is expensive and >> inaccurate. No one in there right mind would even spend the money to >> repair >> one >> if it quit working when they could purchase a GPS for less money and get >> so >> much more. Its not just navigation accuracy its also the wealth of >> information at your fingertips. It would seem that pilot training should >> teach for the current and future not some antiquated equipment that >> should >> be phased out. >> > > > Don't mean to barge in on this thread but I don't really understand the > animosity towards VOR's that seems to have cropped up recently. It's > actually not "inaccurate", true it does take some skill to learn to use it > at first, but after that you really appreciate its simplicity and > reliability. > > The debate about GPS is contentious and has been going on for quite a > while now. The key point being whether to start using it as the _sole_ > means of navigation (rather than as just one means among several). > > That appears to be part of what's behind the effort to eliminate things > like VOR's. Just teach how to use a GPS and then no need to learn all this > other "outdated" technology. > > I may be kinda old-school, but I think that's a ridiculous (and dangerous) > idea for a variety of reasons that I won't go into here (unless we want a > GPS vs other navigation methods thread). > > In small planes like ours, of course, GPS tends to be a lot more > practical, for size and cost reasons usually. But truth is, if I could fit > a decent King VOR in my titan I'd do it in a heartbeat (the one in my A22 > barely works). > > Or heck, any of you guys throwing away your old VOR's, give it to me. I'll > _make_ the sucker fit..... > > As for the ILS, I don't recall too many ILS's that require an ADF. Many > require DME, but I've seen some you can shoot with just a VOR and a > LOC/GS. > > LS > > -------- > LS > FS II > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188900#188900 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff
Date: Jun 21, 2008
From: knowvne(at)aol.com
Rick =C2- I'm so glad you mention the Compass and Clock... Personally I view the GPS as secondary confirmation to what my compass check points and Clock is telling me.. The GPS is also Great for helping you figure fuel requirements 8-) Distance and speed is right in your face.....=C2- BUT here again you=C2-should already have =C2-numbers before leaving the =C2-ground... If the GPS fails for what ever reason =C2-and your=C2-50 miles out =C2 -the last thing you want=C2- is a Panic attack at 3k...... =C2-Course in a Kolb you do have more LZ opt ions than the GA experience gives ya.... 8-) =C2-But landing in someone back yard to ask WHERE AM I =C2-just isnt cool hahahaha Mark -----Original Message----- From: Richard & Martha Neilsen <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net> Sent: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:57 pm Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff st.net>=C2- =C2- Lucien=C2- =C2- Hey join in.=C2- =C2- When I got my private ticket all there was for electronic navigation was VORs and ADFs.=C2- Later I joined a flying club with three planes that all had dual VORs with DME and a ADF.=C2- Believe me I used them and I was good at it.=C2- At the time it was super. But the GPS offers so much more for less.=C2- At best a VOR will give you a radial off a point and maybe a distance if it has DME but Exactly where are you? =C2-The further you are from a VOR the worse it gets. A GPS gives you a graphic and says you are right here. I'm not saying just teach GPS also teach compass and clock (real navigation) for when the power goes out.=C2- =C2- When I was working in the computer field I had to drag slide rules and type writers out of peoples hands all the time. Some people are never comfortable with anything new. You wouldn't believe the battles to get some people to use E-Mail.=C2- =C2- Rick Neilsen=C2- Redrive VW powered MKIIIC=C2- =C2- ----- Original Message ----- From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>=C2- Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 11:40 AM=C2- Subject: Kolb-List: Re: One less hurdle=C2- =C2- - >=C2- >=C2- > NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net wrote:=C2- >> Jim=C2- >>=C2- >> It is so great that we have such talent in our group. Thanks for >> responding.=C2- >>=C2- >> The point I was trying to make is that there is so much to learn that to =C2- >> teach VORs and ADFs is really a waste. This equipment is expensive and =C2- >> inaccurate. No one in there right mind would even spend the money to >> repair=C2- >> one=C2- >> if it quit working when they could purchase a GPS for less money and get >> so=C2- >> much more. Its not just navigation accuracy its also the wealth of=C2- >> information at your fingertips. It would seem that pilot training should =C2- >> teach for the current and future not some antiquated equipment that >> should=C2- >> be phased out.=C2- >>=C2- >=C2- >=C2- > Don't mean to barge in on this thread but I don't really understand the > animosity towards VOR's that seems to have cropped up recently. It's > actually not "inaccurate", true it does take some skill to learn to use it > at first, but after that you really appreciate its simplicity and > reliability.=C2- >=C2- > The debate about GPS is contentious and has been going on for quite a > while now. The key point being whether to start using it as the _sole_ > means of navigation (rather than as just one means among several).=C2- >=C2- > That appears to be part of what's behind the effort to eliminate things > like VOR's. Just teach how to use a GPS and then no need to learn all this > other "outdated" technology.=C2- >=C2- > I may be kinda old-school, but I think that's a ridiculous (and dangerous) > idea for a variety of reasons that I won't go into here (unless we want a > GPS vs other navigation methods thread).=C2- >=C2- > In small planes like ours, of course, GPS tends to be a lot more > practical, for size and cost reasons usually. But truth is, if I could fit > a decent King VOR in my titan I'd do it in a heartbeat (the one in my A22 > barely works).=C2- >=C2- > Or heck, any of you guys throwing away your old VOR's, give it to me. I'll > _make_ the sucker fit.....=C2- >=C2- > As for the ILS, I don't recall too many ILS's that require an ADF. Many > require DME, but I've seen some you can shoot with just a VOR and a > LOC/GS.=C2- >=C2- > LS=C2- >=C2- > --------=C2- > LS=C2- > FS II=C2- >=C2- >=C2- >=C2- >=C2- > Read this topic online here:=C2- >=C2- > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188900#188900=C2- >=C2- >=C2- >=C2- >=C2- >=C2- >=C2- >=C2- >=C2- >=C2- > =C2- ============C2- ============C2- ============C2- ============C2- =C2- =C2- ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 21, 2008
NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net wrote: > Lucien > > Hey join in. > > When I got my private ticket all there was for electronic navigation was > VORs and ADFs. Later I joined a flying club with three planes that all had > dual VORs with DME and a ADF. Believe me I used them and I was good at it. > At the time it was super. But the GPS offers so much more for less. At best > a VOR will give you a radial off a point and maybe a distance if it has DME > but Exactly where are you? The further you are from a VOR the worse it gets. > A GPS gives you a graphic and says you are right here. I'm not saying just > teach GPS also teach compass and clock (real navigation) for when the power > goes out. > > When I was working in the computer field I had to drag slide rules and type > writers out of peoples hands all the time. Some people are never comfortable > with anything new. You wouldn't believe the battles to get some people to > use E-Mail. > > Rick Neilsen > Redrive VW powered MKIIIC > > --- Well I'm ambivalent about GPS personally. I'm all for anything that reduces pilot workload, but at the same time I get really nervous hanging multi-thousand buck airplanes on little crappy electronic devices (especially digital ones). Note tongue is a little in cheek here but.... It's sort of like the debate about putting new technology on engines - electronic fuel injection, electronic spark advance and all this stuff. Fact is, you don't need 95% of that stuff in an aircraft applications for a variety of reasons. A good friend of mine back in TX once told me that the Lycosaurs and continentals were so exactingly refined for aviation that they havn't changed since the late 1940's. Or was it that they quit adding new features in the 1940's and then it's merely been refining them for aviation that's gone on since... Can't remember, but I think his point was quite well made ;). I'd say CDI is the best innovation that's come to aircraft engines in the last 50 years and really the only one that truly improves an a/c engine's situation. This may or may not be true of GPS in avionics. GPS has lot of downsides - it's little crappy digital semiconductors, 100 bucks worth of parts being sold for 100 times that with the single-point failure problem in most cases, the GPS is owned by the military and they frequently intentionally degrade the signal (like they do here) with very little notice and on and on. For reasons like this, I don't like the idea of GPS as _sole_ means of aviation. I think it's fine as one of several and it's absolutely grand in that regard. It adds so much simplicity to navigation and helps so much with situational awareness and so on. But I'm not convinced that it's reliable enough to justify pitching the "old technology" out altogether. An analogue VOR or even two in good working condition can by itself get you out of all kinds of jams even absent anything else (This is how I found myself again on my private long xcountry for example when I got lost). I don't think FnAA agrees tho and they seem to be pushing it as sole means. So who knows. Like I said, if I could fit a good VOR in the titan I'd definitely install one... LS -------- LS FS II Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188966#188966 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Russ Kinne <russ(at)rkiphoto.com>
Subject: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff
Date: Jun 21, 2008
just a humorous comment -- many Bahamian natives fish in small smacks, rocks for ballast, no compass, no lights, no nothing. Good sailors, but the navigation is near-nonexistent. After a storm, when they fetch up on an unknown coast or harbor, their first call is "HELLO DIS PLACE' -- then someone ashore will yell "WELCOME TO ABACO", and then they'll say "HELLOOOO ABACO!" and go on from there. It works. do not archive On Jun 21, 2008, at 2:14 PM, knowvne(at)aol.com wrote: > Rick > I'm so glad you mention the Compass and Clock... > Personally I view the GPS as secondary confirmation to what my > compass check points > and Clock is telling me.. > > The GPS is also Great for helping you figure fuel requirements 8-) > Distance and speed is > right in your face..... > > BUT here again you should already have numbers before leaving the > ground... > > If the GPS fails for what ever reason and your 50 miles out the > last thing you want > is a Panic attack at 3k...... Course in a Kolb you do have more LZ > options than > the GA experience gives ya.... 8-) But landing in someone back > yard to ask > WHERE AM I just isnt cool hahahaha > > > Mark > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard & Martha Neilsen <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net> > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > Sent: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:57 pm > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff > > > > Lucien > > Hey join in. > > When I got my private ticket all there was for electronic > navigation was VORs and ADFs. > Later I joined a flying club with three planes that all had dual > VORs with DME and a ADF. > Believe me I used them and I was good at it. > > At the time it was super. But the GPS offers so much more for less. > > At best a VOR will give you a radial off a point and maybe a > distance if it has DME but Exactly where are you? > > > The further you are from a VOR the worse it gets. A GPS gives you > a graphic and says you are right here. I'm not saying just teach > GPS also teach compass and clock (real navigation) for when the > power goes out. > > When I was working in the computer field I had to drag slide rules > and type writers out of peoples hands all the time. Some people are > never comfortable with anything new. You wouldn't believe the > battles to get some people to use E-Mail. > > Rick Neilsen > Redrive VW powered MKIIIC > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com> > To: > Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 11:40 AM > Subject: Kolb-List: Re: One less hurdle > > > > > > > NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net wrote: > >> Jim > >> > >> It is so great that we have such talent in our group. Thanks for > >> responding. > >> > >> The point I was trying to make is that there is so much to learn > that to > >> teach VORs and ADFs is really a waste. This equipment is > expensive and > >> inaccurate. No one in there right mind would even spend the > money to >> repair > >> one > >> if it quit working when they could purchase a GPS for less money > and get >> so > >> much more. Its not just navigation accuracy its also the wealth of > >> information at your fingertips. It would seem that pilot > training should > >> teach for the current and future not some antiquated equipment > that >> should > >> be phased out. > >> > > > > > > Don't mean to barge in on this thread but I don't really > understand the > animosity towards VOR's that seems to have cropped > up recently. It's > actually not "inaccurate", true it does take > some skill to learn to use it > at first, but after that you really > appreciate its simplicity and > reliability. > > > > The debate about GPS is contentious and has been going on for > quite a > while now. The key point being whether to start using it > as the _sole_ > means of navigation (rather than as just one means > among several). > > > > That appears to be part of what's behind the effort to eliminate > things > like VOR's. Just teach how to use a GPS and then no need > to learn all this > other "outdated" technology. > > > > I may be kinda old-school, but I think that's a ridiculous (and > dangerous) > idea for a variety of reasons that I won't go into > here (unless we want a > GPS vs other navigation methods thread). > > > > In small planes like ours, of course, GPS tends to be a lot more > > practical, for size and cost reasons usually. But truth is, if I > could fit > a decent King VOR in my titan I'd do it in a heartbeat > (the one in my A22 > barely works). > > > > Or heck, any of you guys throwing away your old VOR's, give it to > me. I'll > _make_ the sucker fit..... > > > > As for the ILS, I don't recall too many ILS's that require an > ADF. Many > require DME, but I've seen some you can shoot with just > a VOR and a > LOC/GS. > > > > LS > > > > -------- > > LS > > FS II > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188900#188900 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ========== > et="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List > ========== > p://forums.matronics.com > ========== > blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > ========== > > > Get the Moviefone Toolbar. Showtimes, theaters, movie news, & more! > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "William and/or Justina Fyfe" <wjfyfe(at)att.net>
Subject: Who is going to be at Arlington?
Date: Jun 22, 2008
________________________________________________________________________________
From: <apilot(at)surewest.net>
Subject: Re: reviews
Date: Jun 21, 2008
As I remember, there are 4 levels of learning. Rote, Insight, Perception and finally Reflex. I am an old, old flight instructor who learned in a tail dragger. One can learn with an instructor or one can learn without an instructor. A rusty old pilot in a new plane maybe just as prone to accident as a novice. I taxied my Kolb Mark III Classic for about 3 or more hours before I even lifted the tail at high speed. After all, over 1000 hours of labor and $18,000 dollars of investment, gets ones attention. How would one know how much taxi time is required before trying to crow hop? It is somewhere between Perception and Reflex. The more that one does not want to wreck his airplane, the more he will want to achieve accurate and quick reflexs. One other thing: If one gets confident enough to leave the airport, DO NOT just go up and fly around. Make a plan to fly somewhere and do it. Such as: 5 - 10 pattern flights in a row without touching wheels to the ground. In othe r! words, get comfortable with the approach before trying a landing. Have an eventless flight. Vic ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 21, 2008
From: TheWanderingWench <thewanderingwench(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Who is going to be at Arlington?
I will be there. Arty Trost Sandy, Oregon www.LessonsFromTheEdge.com "Life's a daring adventure or nothing" Helen Keller "I refuse to tip toe through life just to arrive safely at death." --- On Sat, 6/21/08, William and/or Justina Fyfe wrote: > From: William and/or Justina Fyfe <wjfyfe(at)att.net> > Subject: Kolb-List: Who is going to be at Arlington? > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Saturday, June 21, 2008, 5:29 PM > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: One less hurdle
Date: Jun 22, 2008
the ship-captain license still requires you to know the light code for minesweepers! >> Stick with it Russ. Our little turbanned friends might decide that laying mines is simpler than flying airplanes into tall buildings. Anything disappeared mysteriously in the Bermuda Triangle recently? Cheers Pat :-) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: You have received photos from Adobe Photoshop Album Starter
Edition 3.0
Date: Jun 22, 2008
What altitude were you when you took this photo from your Kolb?>> Good one John. I can`t claim to have taken this one. If I had my attitude was likely to have been `Extremely anxious` As you probably guessed this was a picture from a national daily newspaper. Looking for crop circles at this time of the year is a local pastime. Usually about a dozen appear although generally not so complicated as this one Farmers tend to charge sightseers to walk around their fields but in an ultralight it is all free. For some reason the area west of my field, for about 20 miles is a favourite place for these things to appear. It used to be also an area where UFO`s were reported. One night a few years ago, at dusk Wendy and I had been viewing crop circles from the Challenger. I knew that there was some sort of multinational gathering of UFO spotters who were supposed to be keeping a vigil all night from the local hills . It had got pretty dark and I reckoned that I would be invisible to the UFO watchers even if they heard me. We flew past the UFO gang just above their height, about 800ft agl and about a mile distance. As we came abeam Wendy fired off her camera flash. Then we headed for home. Sure enough the local paper had "Light in the sky mystifies UFO watchers` that weekend. Cheers Pat :-) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: fuel prices
Date: Jun 22, 2008
Hi, someone on the list queried avgas prices over here. This from todaysissue of FLYER. Varying prices from =A31.34 + VAT to =A31.51 + VAT. That doesnt look too bad until you realise that is PER LITRE. I am not surewhat the VAT rate is. Generally it is 17.5% but there is a Fuel Tax and I do not know if if that is included in th main body of the price or not. Since the 1980`s the Fuel Tax for aircraft has been at 50% that of motor fuel but that protection is due to be removed. Courtesy of the European Union. Current price for motor fuel is !.34 per litre for diesel and =A31.28 for normal unleaded. I have started a collection of very strong rubber bands.... Cheers Pat :-( ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff
From: "Thom Riddle" <riddletr(at)gmail.com>
Date: Jun 22, 2008
The last GA airplane I flew regularly, until 2004, had a VOR and an ADF. The VOR worked most of the time and the ADF worked only when I could find an NDB still in service, which was not all that often. The slow death of VOR and NDB is a certainty because as the ground facilities become disabled or fail, the FAA is no longer fixing them except those for which there is no reasonable alternative, yet. On May 19, 1967, I found myself a bit "mis-placed" on a night flight from Atlanta to Opa-Locka, FL. I was talking to Opa-Locka Tower but in the MIA traffic pattern, about 7 miles south of Opa-Locka. I'd never flown into either one before even during day time. It did not take long for the controller to figure out what had happened and I was vectored north with no further problems. If GPS had been invented back then that slight "misplacement" would not have occurred. If transponders had been required back then, it would not have occurred. As soon as the Cessna 162 SkyCatchers become available, a friend who owns/operates a local flight school wants me to do their SP instruction. The 162 will have all glass Garmin G300 multifunction and primary flight displays sort of like a junior version of the G1000. He now operates three 172s, all with Garmin Glass. I've flown one of them once. It is a lot of new stuff to learn but once I get a handle on it, there will be no going back, at least not in modern GA. Just wait until the new ADS-B stuff becomes a requirement! And yet, for pure joy of flying, simple is much better. Nothing like a Kolb for that.... but I do like the EIS, compact reliable and accurate! -------- Thom Riddle N221FA Allegro 2000 912UL N197BG FS1/447 -------------------- It has been said that man is a rational animal. All my life I have been searching for evidence which could support this. - Bertrand Russell Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189019#189019 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: reviews
Date: Jun 22, 2008
I agree Vic. I don't go along with the advice some give about stalls during the initial flight. First get the feel of the aircraft during normal flight with shallow easy turns. Check how out of rig it is. The last thing I would want to do is an unintentional spin in the plane I had next to zero experience in. Stalls are highly over rated as a familiarity exercise. Go for that first one in ground effect. BB On 21, Jun 2008, at 10:32 PM, wrote: > > As I remember, there are 4 levels of learning. Rote, Insight, > Perception and finally Reflex. I am an old, old flight instructor > who learned in a tail dragger. One can learn with an instructor or > one can learn without an instructor. A rusty old pilot in a new > plane maybe just as prone to accident as a novice. I taxied my > Kolb Mark III Classic for about 3 or more hours before I even > lifted the tail at high speed. After all, over 1000 hours of labor > and $18,000 dollars of investment, gets ones attention. How would > one know how much taxi time is required before trying to crow hop? > It is somewhere between Perception and Reflex. The more that one > does not want to wreck his airplane, the more he will want to > achieve accurate and quick reflexs. One other thing: If one gets > confident enough to leave the airport, DO NOT just go up and fly > around. Make a plan to fly somewhere and do it. Such as: 5 - 10 > pattern flights in a row without touching wheels to the ground. In > othe > r! > words, get comfortable with the approach before trying a landing. > Have an eventless flight. Vic > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 22, 2008
From: <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: reviews
One other thing: If one gets confident enough to leave the airport, DO NOT just go up and fly around. Make a plan to fly somewhere and do it. Such as: 5 - 10 pattern flights in a row without touching wheels to the ground. In othe > r! > words, get comfortable with the approach before trying a landing. > Have an eventless flight. Vic Hi Vic: Good advice. One does not have to land the first approach, as long as the engine is running. Keep shooting approaches until it feels right or better. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 22, 2008
From: <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: reviews
I don't go along with the advice some give about stalls > during the initial flight. > BB Bob B: Homer Kolb, back during the dark ages of the early 1980's, always gave this instruction in the "How to fly your Kolb" section of the builders manual, "Climb to at least 1,000 feet above the ground, check the stall speed." I still agree with Homer's instructions from so long ago. How else will I know what the stall speed is if I do not check it? In a Kolb, it is a no brainer. From straight and level flight there is little or no chance of spinning a Kolb during a stall. Once the stall is out of the way, then I am equipped to add my margin and work on getting the Kolb back on the ground. I always check the stall speed on any new Kolb I fly, and when flying passengers of differing weight, I check stall with those passengers, especially the big'uns. There are a lot of differences in ASI's. No matter how accurate or inaccurate, it will always stall at the same indicated airspeed, unless the instrument is inop or one is getting into accelerated stalls. However, in a first flight in a Kolb, one would be hard pressed to get into an accelerated stall solo. I used to fail, most of the time, demonstrating the MKIII in an accelerated stall. Unless I was really loaded up, the old MKIII would not get into an accelerated stall. When it did, it was an immediate recovery to relax the stick pressure momentarily. At Sun and Fun and Oskosh demonstrations are conducted less than 500 feet AGL. This is plenty altitude for an experienced Kolb pilot to demonstrate the aircraft. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 22, 2008
From: <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: fuel prices
---- "pj.ladd" wrote: > Hi, > someone on the list queried avgas prices over here. This from todaysissue of FLYER. Good Morning Patrick: Pounds, liters, and VAT, do not mean a thing to 95% of your audience, especially me. ;-) Could you translate your fuel prices into gallons and dollars? or do you have the same problem I have? During my recent flight out West, I found av gas prices were not much more than auto fuel prices, and diesel prices were more than av gas prices. Putting a crimp in my flying, as well as my driving style. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)juno.com>
Date: Jun 22, 2008
Any words of advice for adding a passenger to your Kolb Twinstar for the first time (and what to expect)? I was told to gradually add weight (50lbs at a time or so), but how to do that safely is another question. -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189050#189050 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 22, 2008
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: re: William Sullivan accident
Another trip to the hospital. I can only get to the computer now and then. I had minor bruises, minor cuts (no stitches), a broken neck (one crack), broken back (lumbar area- 2 or more cracks), and a broken pelvis (3 or 4 cracks). Pelvis is not attached to spine- cracked and can't take ANY weight. I am going to spend the next 12-16 weeks on the living room floor. The only danger is to my neck, as the cracked vertabrae can pinch or rupture an artery. My butt hurts. At least I wasn't seriously injured, but I do have to wear a cervical collar all the time, and a body brace when I am up in the wheel chair. I still haven't read the mail- can't stay up long enough. Later Bill Sullivan ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 22, 2008
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff
>On my second Solo XC I land at a little dirt strip so to find out where I >was...BUT I wouldn't havelanded had they painted the name in the Dirt ... Mark, I was taught to circle a town water tower. At that time most had the town name painted on them. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 22, 2008
From: "VICTOR PETERS" <vicsv(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff
All Why not just get a backup GPS Vic N740VP ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Kmet" <jlsk1(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 22, 2008
Cristal, I have done this 2 times.Start with Bags of something, sand, grain, something clean too. I`d start with about 75 or100 lbs, 50 will be hardly noticeable.Take off after MAKING SURE that the strapped in weight CANNOT move.The last thing you want is the weight to shift duiring movement & lock up a flight control.Then go up as all have suggested & do the stalls to see what airspeed they occurred at, & write them down.Gradually build up to the weight you`re comfortable hauling.Say maybe 125, then 150, & so on. Know how it will handle before you take Live passengers!. Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)juno.com> Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 8:38 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar > > > Any words of advice for adding a passenger to your Kolb Twinstar for the > first time (and what to expect)? I was told to gradually add weight > (50lbs at a time or so), but how to do that safely is another question. > > -------- > Cristal Waters > Mark II Twinstar > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189050#189050 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Lee/Cannon" <leecannon(at)telus.net>
Subject: HKS Twinstar
Date: Jun 22, 2008
Hello Kolb group - my name is Rob Cannon. I am rebuilding a Twinstar mark 2 , including installing the HKS engine on it. My plane has flaperons, which I dont believe are original, and am cosidering removing. I am looking for build plans for the twinstar, or a photo of the original aileron bell crank bit that attaches to the root tube. If anyone has any comments on flaperons on a Kolb, I'd love to hear them. If anyone has I any questions about the HKS install, I'd be happy to answer them. cheers, Rob Cannon Salt Spring Island BC Canada ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff
Date: Jun 22, 2008
From: knowvne(at)aol.com
Jack Good Tip, but dont the locals get upset using those things for Race Pylons 8 -) Back home in CA were I got lost we use to joke about flying low enough to re ad =C2- Free way signs hahaha Today I use a compass =C2-most flights and the GPS as my confirmation... =C2- BTW =C2-I have family in Winchester and Nabb IN.. Know any Vaughns or Johnsons =C2-down there? Mark -----Original Message----- From: Jack B. Hart <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net> Sent: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:52 am Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff >On my second Solo XC I land at a little dirt strip so to find out where I >was...BUT I wouldn't have=C2-landed had they painted the name in the Dirt ... Mark, I was taught to circle a town water tower. At that time most had the town name painted on them. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 22, 2008
Cristal Good advise. One more thing to take into consideration is that sand or what ever you strap down (if you put it in the seat) will not give you the forward CG loading that a person would give you. It's surprising how heavy legs are. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIC ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Kmet" <jlsk1(at)frontiernet.net> Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 11:49 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar > > Cristal, I have done this 2 times.Start with Bags of something, sand, > grain, something clean too. I`d start with about 75 or100 lbs, 50 will be > hardly noticeable.Take off after MAKING SURE that the strapped in weight > CANNOT move.The last thing you want is the weight to shift duiring > movement & lock up a flight control.Then go up as all have suggested & do > the stalls to see what airspeed they occurred at, & write them > down.Gradually build up to the weight you`re comfortable hauling.Say maybe > 125, then 150, & so on. Know how it will handle before you take Live > passengers!. Jim > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)juno.com> > To: > Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 8:38 AM > Subject: Kolb-List: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar > > >> >> >> Any words of advice for adding a passenger to your Kolb Twinstar for the >> first time (and what to expect)? I was told to gradually add weight >> (50lbs at a time or so), but how to do that safely is another question. >> >> -------- >> Cristal Waters >> Mark II Twinstar >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189050#189050 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: fuel prices
Date: Jun 22, 2008
John, Math was never my strong subject but this is the way it works, I think 1 is worth $1.97 3.78litres to US Gall. Price here about 1.20 per litre (and over) Say $2.364 per litre. $2.364 multiplied by 3.78 =$8.93 Roughly 9 bucks a gallon to you. Hope that is right. By the way. VAT ( the French call it TVA, but then they would) stands for Value Added Tax. Each country in Europe fixes their own rate and usually some exemptions. Here food is VAT rated Zero. but the idea is that all countries should become the same eventually. On the other hand there are no State or local taxes.. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: re: William Sullivan accident
Date: Jun 22, 2008
Another trip to the hospital.>> Hard luck Bill, I think everyone had gathered from the first reports that you had got away with it scot free. Very sorry to learn that is not so. Nothing anyone can do except to wish you well. Keep up with the list and let us know how you are progressing. Cheers and best wishes Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 22, 2008
how to do that safely is another question.>> No problem Cristal, get a large plastic tank.tie it firmly in the passenger seat. Use the seatbelts plus as many bungee`s as you need to fix it IMMOVABLY. You do not want it falling onto the stick when you put your nose down on the approach Put some water in the tank in gradually increasing amounts. You can fill it in situ with a hose which will save you having to lug a heavy tank around. 10 gallons is a heavy load to lift and manouvre into place and you will need more than that A plastic tank is also clean and will not mess up the upholstery. Sand is dirty and awkward. Don`t use it. Good luck Pat. . ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: fuel prices
Date: Jun 22, 2008
> Roughly 9 bucks a gallon to you. > > Pat Thanks, Patrick: Good explanation. Makes a lot more sense to me now. That is a lot more than I paid for 87 oct this morning, $3.76 a gal. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)juno.com>
Date: Jun 22, 2008
My passenger seat is very small...smaller than the Mark III. If I use a container filled with water it would have to be a very tall, skinny container (10lbs of water is only 80 lbs) and I can't picture being able to keep 150 lbs of bags of sand in that tiny seat without it shifting somewhere where I wouldn't want it to go even if I strap it in good. If I put the sand in a container, again it would have to be a very tall, skinny container and I don't know how much weight that would add (anyone know how much weight is in a cubic foot of sand?). Someone else suggested to me to gradually add weights (like the kind you have on the end of a dumbbell) in a bag and strap that down, but someone else thought it would be dangerous...that it couldn't be secured properly. Is there more danger in trying to add weight like this (and as mentioned the possibility of it shifting) or simply adding a real person (not a fat kid :), but a fellow experienced pilot)? Are there any other differences to be aware of besides a longer takeoff (we have a 6000ft runway here which should be way more than enough since I barely use any of it when I'm by myself) and a faster approach on landing (adding the 10-15mph to the new stall speed)? assuming still air -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189102#189102 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 22, 2008
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
> Cristal, You can purchase sand in 25 pound plastic bags. Does not cost very much and it is easy to load/unload and fairly clean and easy to secure in the seat. If you are worried about it shifting, purchase some light ratchet strap type mechanisms that are used to hold odd shaped loads in pickups etc. They are very inexpensive and can be used for all sorts of things. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 22, 2008
> My passenger seat is very small...smaller than the Mark III. > > -------- > Cristal Waters Cristal: Been a long time since I flew my first passenger in a MKIII. I don't recall hauling sand or water prior to putting a RLP (real live person) in the passenger seat. I think it is absolutely normal for a new pilot to want to fly a passenger as soon as they get their credentials to do so. We want to share the love of our experiences in the air and show folks we can really fly an airplane, all by ourselves. I was that way. As a much older, more experienced Kolb pilot, who has hauled many, many passengers, over the years, I think I have a little different attitude now about getting an innocent passenger up in my little Kolb as quickly as possible after getting licensed. I think if I had to do it over again, I would build some good flight time, gain a lot of experience, and prepare myself to make that first passenger carrying flight and all those that follow as safe as possible, insuring I get myself and my passenger home safely. When you are ready to take up your first passenger, you should have more than enough runway, 6,000 feet, to be able to feel out your airplane which will change quite a bit after putting a passenger in the other seat. In the MKIII there is a need for much more nose up trim than when flying solo. In addition, the aircraft will not respond as quickly and the increased stall speed will be the primary differences in flying solo and dual. I have never flown a MKII, so can not help you in that respect. Personally, I would not want anything in the passenger seat, unless it was a passenger, especially not water and sand. The last thing I would ever want to do is injure or kill a passenger (or myself). john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff
Date: Jun 22, 2008
knowvne(at)aol.com: Was wondering how much flight experience you base your opinion on? Do you do a lot of cross country flying? BTW would be nice if we knew who we were talking with, what you are flying or building, and where you live. Not much fun talking to an email address we know nothing about. In addition to pilotage and dead reckoning, I am assuming you also use a se ctional to navigate. Take care, john h mkIII titus, al ----- Original Message ----- From: knowvne(at)aol.com To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 3:40 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff IMO Knowing how to deadrecon with a compass and clock is the way all XC flights should be conducted... The GPS should be viewed as a confirmation device to preflight planning .... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Eugene Zimmerman <ez(at)embarqmail.com>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 22, 2008
On Jun 22, 2008, at 3:59 PM, cristalclear13 wrote: > Are there any other differences to be aware of besides a longer > takeoff (we have a 6000ft runway here which should be way more than > enough since I barely use any of it when I'm by myself) and a faster > approach on landing (adding the 10-15mph to the new stall speed)? > assuming still air Cristal, I believe John Hauck has given you the best advise yet. Your comment above shows a good grasp of the requirements for hauling extra weight. But please be aware that the Mark II was found to have marginal elevator authority for two normal sized adults compared with the Mark III which was give significantly larger tail feathers. With two aboard in a Mark II it is very important for you to discover "at altitude" your minimum safe speed that still provides adequate nose up elevator authority. I consider the Mark II a 1.75 place airplane, not a 2 place airplane. My opinion only. With proper awareness it can be done safely, but please be careful. Gene ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: HKS Twinstar
From: "robcannon" <leecannon(at)telus.net>
Date: Jun 22, 2008
I am considering removing the flaperon system for two reasons. After installing the hks, custom fuel tanks, electric fuel pumps, etc. the twinstar has gained a few pounds. I am using 750 lbs. as the gross and it is up to 460 empty. hmmmmmmmmmm. As the present flaperon system is poorly built, and I am looking for ways to shed weight. Rob Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189134#189134 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Bill's Accident
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 22, 2008
Thats good to hear Ed, from the last post it sounded like you guys were ready to pack up and leave. Its nothing short of unjust and hypocritical that the county would want to close an ultralight strip at the first accident, if that was the standard every recreational activity in the US would have to be closed down. There have been accidents in the past where I fly, and there will be more, Accidents happen, in any sport... I hope William has a speedy recovery and gets in the air. It really suck to go through that he has and never get to fly ! Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189136#189136 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 22, 2008
The biggest change I feel in my MK III with a passenger is the elevator authority. I heaviest passenger I have taken up is 210 pounds, and thats my limit. With the 912-S, the plane has more than enough power to fly a heavier load, but I feel that I would not have enough up elevator authority with a heavier passenger. John H's advice about having a very long runway is good, if you want to fly someone, have them drive to an airport with a long runway and fly them from there until you see how your plane will perform. Also keep your speed up on approach, which is good technique weather alone or with someone. Also if you have a smaller engine, be ready for and do a much shallower climb, you will be surprised how much the extra weight slows down your climb. You will see your climb angle more like a heavy loaded Cessna rather than the normal steep climb of an ultralight. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189141#189141 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff
Date: Jun 22, 2008
From: knowvne(at)aol.com
Hi John Iv' e been flying since 1979 .. Soloed in a Acrobat C-150....=C2- The =C2-Compass VOR, =C2-ADF, and YES the Sectional=C2-was the only wa y to fly.... At least until 88 when I took up HangGliding 8-) 120 GA hours - Longest XC 500 miles 2000 hours Plus in=C2-HangGliders - =C2-longest XC 81 miles....=C2-Lot s of trees up here 8-( 5 hours in sail planes - Just around the patch and some thermal and ridge so aring... 10 hours in Trikes - maybe 2 hours of XC all dead reckoning =C2-( my new l ove ) Also Two Static Line Parachute jumps... =C2- 3000 ft straight down... That was enough hahaha 8-) I suppose the faster you fly the more helpful the GPS can be to helping you stay Well ahead of what your flying.... =C2-But it seems to me THATS all the mo re reason to know how to use the compass and dead reckon if the thing Fails... At 250 kts imagine how little time would need to pass for you to be WAY off course.... Today the way I fly I like to enjoy the Roses=C2-as I pass over them.... =C2-In=C2-HGs I rarely reached 60 kts =C2-usually teens to 30s ( airsp eed).. In Trikes its about the same for Kolbs=C2-50 to 60 is about average... The GPS is a great tool for quickly figureing fuel requirements once your in the air... It can tell you pretty quickly how close you are to your preflight=C2-=C2 -estimate .. No more do we have to pass a couple predetermined checkpoints and watch the clock to know how close we are... Mark -----Original Message----- From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com> Sent: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 5:17 pm Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff knowvne(at)aol.com: =C2- Was wondering how much flight experience you base your opinion on? =C2- Do you do a lot of cross country flying? =C2- BTW would be nice if we knew who we were talking with, what you are flying or building, and where you live.=C2- Not much fu n talking to an email address we know nothing about. =C2- In addition to pilotage and dead reckoning, I am assuming you also use a sectional to navigate. =C2- Take care, =C2- john h mkIII titus, al ----- Original Message ----- From: knowvne(at)aol.com Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 3:40 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff =C2- IMO =C2- Knowing how to deadrecon with a compass and clock=C2- is the way all XC flights should be conducted...=C2- The GPS should be viewed=C2-as a confirmation=C2-device to preflight planning .... =C2- =C2- =C2- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff
Date: Jun 22, 2008
Mark: That's very interesting. Unless I missed it, you didn't tell us where you were from, what you are bu ilding or flying, and who you are. You can quickly figure fuel with an E6B, along with a lot of other valuable info. Do you use an E6B? I also learned to fly cross country by pilotage and dead reckoning. Flew t hat way through most of my Army career, and until 1993, when I got my first GPS. I have a few more cross country hours than you do over the last 40 y ears and use my GPS for my primary nav instrument. It is a very important instrument, very reliable, improving my flight safety many times over my ba ck up of pilotage and dead reckoning. Once in a while I will hit a dead sp ot where no GPS signal can be obtained. Usually lasts for 20 or 30 miles. That has only happened 3 or 4 times in the last 2,500+ hours of flying. I have flown with GPS all over CONUS, Canada, and Alaska. Would not leave h ome without it. Recommend you get a GPS, use it and discover the many tasks it can perform for you. You will be amazed. Right off the top of my head, I think knowing what your ground speed is at all times is a function that is impossible to obtain constantly using pilot age and dead reckoning. Another is sunset at your destination, how long it will take to get there and how much fuel it will take. Nearest airports h ave saved my buns many times on cross country flights. John W and I used t hat feature many times during our last cross country flight out West. We e ncountered several thunderstorms, and many days of high winds, and periods of reduced visibility. Finding fuel and a safe landing area was quick and at our finger tips at all times. Take care, john h mkIII Titus, Alabama ----- Original Message ----- From: knowvne(at)aol.com To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 7:10 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff Hi John Iv' e been flying since 1979 .. Soloed in a Acrobat C-150.... The Compass VOR, ADF, and YES the Sectional was the only way to fly.... At least until 88 when I took up HangGliding 8-) 120 GA hours - Longest XC 500 miles 2000 hours Plus in HangGliders - longest XC 81 miles.... Lots of trees u p here 8-( 5 hours in sail planes - Just around the patch and some thermal and ridge soaring... 10 hours in Trikes - maybe 2 hours of XC all dead reckoning ( my new lov e ) Also Two Static Line Parachute jumps... 3000 ft straight down... That was enough hahaha 8-) I suppose the faster you fly the more helpful the GPS can be to helping y ou stay Well ahead of what your flying.... But it seems to me THATS all the more reason to know how to use the compass and dead reckon if the thing Fails... At 2 50 kts imagine how little time would need to pass for you to be WAY off course.. .. Today the way I fly I like to enjoy the Roses as I pass over them.... In HGs I rarely reached 60 kts usually teens to 30s ( airspeed).. In Trikes its about the same for Kolbs 50 to 60 is about average... The GPS is a great tool for quickly figureing fuel requirements once your in the air... It can tell you pretty quickly how close you are to your preflight estim ate .. No more do we have to pass a couple predetermined checkpoints and watch t he clock to know how close we are... Mark -----Original Message----- From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com> To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 5:17 pm Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff knowvne(at)aol.com: Was wondering how much flight experience you base your opinion on? Do you do a lot of cross country flying? BTW would be nice if we knew who we were talking with, what you are flyin g or building, and where you live. Not much fun talking to an email addres s we know nothing about. In addition to pilotage and dead reckoning, I am assuming you also use a sectional to navigate. Take care, john h mkIII titus, al ----- Original Message ----- From: knowvne(at)aol.com To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 3:40 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff IMO Knowing how to deadrecon with a compass and clock is the way all XC flights should be conducted... The GPS should be viewed as a confirmation device to preflight planning .... or?Kolb-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List p://forums.matronics.com ution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Get the Moviefone Toolbar. Showtimes, theaters, movie news, & more! ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)juno.com>
Date: Jun 22, 2008
Thanks for everyone's advice and input. I believe that even if I get my license next month I'll wait until much cooler weather before even thinking about adding another person (and in south Georgia sometimes it's very late in the year before it really cools down). That will also give me more time to fly it on my own. Perhaps I'll stick to renting the Cessna (for a while) if someone wants to go up with me. -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189181#189181 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff
Date: Jun 22, 2008
From: knowvne(at)aol.com
Hi John Sorry about that..=C2- I'm up =C2-here in New England... Not building much of anything these days .. Maybe a Few RCs now and then... Rather spend my limited free=C2-time flyin g instead of building... Although I would love to build a Carbon Dragon Sail Plane like a buddy of mi ne has.. It has a Sink Rate of 98 ft per =C2-min.. That give you the potential of s oaring all day 8-) =C2- Finding 100 fpm lift is very common on a good soaring day.... =C2-Great GA S Mileage 8-) I do own and use a GPS =C2-a garmin 76CS and a Etrex Legend. I =C2-didn' t mean to imply=C2- I don't use them.. I just don't rely on it for my primary=C2-NAV tool..... If it fails so what I was using the compass and dead reckoning anyway.... =C2-I fly the compass and look out front=C2- picking=C2-way points to head for... =C2-When I get there I'll look at t he GPS to confirm how close=C2- I=C2-am to its course line... =C2-It quickly confirms how well I'm doing ..=C2- GPS is my back up tool to confirm what I already know.. =C2-Like I said re al time GS is what=C2- I like most=C2-about them.. =C2-Makes figuring=C2-fuel needs quick and simple.. BTW=C2- was in AK last Aug.. Would have loved to got some air time over some of thos e Glaciers we hike on.... =C2-8-) Mark Mark: =C2- That's very interesting. =C2- Unless I missed it, you didn't tell us where you were from, what you are bui lding or flying, and who you are.=C2- You can quickly figure fuel with an E6B, along with a lot of other valuable info.=C2- Do you use an E6B? Yea I own the Circular Slide Rule.. No battery powered version there either. . 8-) =C2- I also learned to fly cross country by pilotage and dead reckoning.=C2- Flew that way through most of my Army career, and unti l 1993, when I got my first GPS.=C2-=C2- I have a few more cross country hours than you do over the last 40 years and use my GPS for my primary nav instrument. It is a very important instrument, very reliable, improving my flight safety many times over my back up of pilotage and dead reckoning. =C2- Once in a while I will hit a dead spot where no GPS signal can be obtained.=C2- Usually lasts for 20 or 30 miles.=C2- That has only happen ed 3 or 4 times in the last 2,500+ hours of flying. =C2-=C2- I have flown with GPS all over CONUS, Canada, and Alaska.=C2- Would not leave home without it. =C2- Recommend you get a GPS, use it and discover the many tasks it can perform for you.=C2- You will be amazed. =C2- Right off the top of my head, I think knowing what your ground speed is at all times is a function that is impossible to obtain constantly using pilotage and dead reckoning.=C2- Another is sunset at you r destination, how long it will take to get there and how much fuel it will take.=C2- Nearest airports have saved my buns many times on cross country flights.=C2- John W and I used that feature many times during our last cro ss country flight out West.=C2- We encountered several thunderstorms, and man y days of high winds, and periods of reduced visibility.=C2- Finding fuel an d a safe landing area was quick and at our finger tips at all times. =C2- Take care, =C2- john h mkIII Titus, Alabama =C2- =C2- =C2- ----- Original Message ----- From: knowvne(at)aol.com Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 7:10 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff Hi John Iv' e been flying since 1979 .. Soloed in a Acrobat C-150....=C2- The =C2-Compass VOR, =C2-ADF, and YES the Sectional=C2-was the only way to fly.... At least until 88 when I took up HangGliding 8-) 120 GA hours - Longest XC 500 miles 2000 hours Plus in=C2-HangGliders - =C2-longest XC 81 miles....=C2-Lots of trees up here 8-( 5 hours in sail planes - Just around the patch and some thermal and ridge soaring... 10 hours in Trikes - maybe 2 hours of XC all dead reckoning =C2-( my new love ) Also Two Static Line Parachute jumps... =C2- 3000 ft straight down... That was enough hahaha 8-) I suppose the faster you fly the more helpful the GPS can be to helping you stay Well ahead of what your flying.... =C2-But it seems to me THATS all the more reason to know how to use the compass and dead reckon if the thing Fails... At 250 kts imagine how little time would need to pass for you to be WAY off course..... Today the way I fly I like to enjoy the Roses=C2-as I pass over them.... =C2-In=C2-HGs I rarely reached 60 kts =C2-usually teens to 30s ( airspeed).. In Trikes its about the same for Kolbs=C2-50 to 60 is about average... The GPS is a great tool for quickly figureing fuel requirements once your in the air... It can tell you pretty quickly how close you are to your preflight=C2-=C2-estimate .. No more do we have to pass a couple predetermined checkpoints and watch the clock to know how close we are... Mark -----Original Message----- From: John Hauck Sent: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 5:17 pm Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff knowvne(at)aol.com: =C2- Was wondering how much flight experience you base your opinion on? =C2- Do you do a lot of cross country flying? =C2- BTW would be nice if we knew who we were talking with, what you are flying or building, and where you live.=C2- Not much fun talking to an email address we know nothing about. =C2- In addition to pilotage and dead reckoning, I am assuming you also use a sectional to navigate. =C2- Take care, =C2- john h mkIII titus, al ----- Original Message ----- From: knowvne(at)aol.com Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 3:40 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff =C2- IMO =C2- Knowing how to deadrecon with a compass and clock=C2- is the way all XC flights should be conducted...=C2- The GPS should be viewed=C2-as a confirmation=C2-device to preflight planning .... =C2- =C2- =C2- or?Kolb-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List p://forums.matronics.com ution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution Get the Moviefone Toolbar. Showtimes, theaters, movie news, & more! p://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List ics.com .matronics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tony Oldman" <aoldman(at)xtra.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 23, 2008
Would it not be a lot simpler to just do a checkflight with your instructor . That way you get the fell of the plane with a whole lot of experiance sitting beside you. When I first flew the MK111 ,I did so with a instructor and all he got me to do was some basic steep turns ,figger 8s, stalls, power on ,power off and about 3 take offs / landings then away I went. I completed about 5 hours solo before the first passanger flight.I had about 150hrs ultralight time before that and it was all tail dragger stuff. I have not flown a Twinstar and do not want to put you wrong but I would be looking to put some experiance in the passanger seat for that first flight if I had any concerns at all Tony MK111 400 hrs ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Kmet" <jlsk1(at)frontiernet.net> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 3:49 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar > > Cristal, I have done this 2 times.Start with Bags of something, sand, > grain, something clean too. I`d start with about 75 or100 lbs, 50 will be > hardly noticeable.Take off after MAKING SURE that the strapped in weight > CANNOT move.The last thing you want is the weight to shift duiring > movement & lock up a flight control.Then go up as all have suggested & do > the stalls to see what airspeed they occurred at, & write them > down.Gradually build up to the weight you`re comfortable hauling.Say maybe > 125, then 150, & so on. Know how it will handle before you take Live > passengers!. Jim > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)juno.com> > To: > Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 8:38 AM > Subject: Kolb-List: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar > > >> >> >> Any words of advice for adding a passenger to your Kolb Twinstar for the >> first time (and what to expect)? I was told to gradually add weight >> (50lbs at a time or so), but how to do that safely is another question. >> >> -------- >> Cristal Waters >> Mark II Twinstar >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189050#189050 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Russ Kinne <russ(at)rkiphoto.com>
Subject: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff
Date: Jun 22, 2008
Nothing wrong with reading highway and other signs! -- I even carry binoculars do not archive On Jun 22, 2008, at 12:19 PM, knowvne(at)aol.com wrote: > Jack > Good Tip, but dont the locals get upset using those things for Race > Pylons 8-) > > Back home in CA were I got lost we use to joke about flying low > enough to read > Free way signs hahaha > Today I use a compass most flights and the GPS as my confirmation... > > > BTW I have family in Winchester and Nabb IN.. > > Know any Vaughns or Johnsons down there? > > Mark > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jack B. Hart <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net> > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > Sent: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:52 am > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff > > > > > >On my second Solo XC I land at a little dirt strip so to find out > where I > >was...BUT I wouldn't have landed had they painted the name in the > Dirt ... > > Mark, > > I was taught to circle a town water tower. At that time most had > the town > name painted on them. > > Jack B. Hart FF004 > Winchester, IN > > > et="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List > p://forums.matronics.com > blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > > Get the Moviefone Toolbar. Showtimes, theaters, movie news, & more! > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: fuel prices
Date: Jun 23, 2008
but the difference is all the taxes, additives and extra refinements mandated by our government that causes us to pay more.>> Same here Will, most of the price of fuel is now the tax which has been increased steadily (stealthily) over the years. The good side of all this is that the increasing price makes it worthwhile to adopt, or invent, alternatives. The only thing that gets those things going is economics. If there is a buck to be made someone will be on the case. Enjoy the price of fuel as it is. It will seem low in 5 years. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff
Date: Jun 23, 2008
Nothing wrong with reading highway and other signs! -- I even carry binoculars>> Why not Russ? Here flying by following the railways used to be standard practice. You just dropped a little lower to read the station sign. Locally, I often follow the pub signs as I know where most of them are. My ex partner in the Eurostar is a railway buff. He knows where all the old lines which are now dismantled used to run. While flying he will point to a long straight field or a hedge an say `Thats where the old Bath and Radstock line used to be` and pinpoint his position. Talking of flying low. The No 1 Training School of the Royal Flying Corps, before it became the Royal Air Force between the Wars, was on Salisbury Plain. There was a serious proposal from the RFC that Stonehenge ( all of 20ft high) be removed as a danger to flying. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff
Date: Jun 23, 2008
It has a Sink Rate of 98 ft per min.. That give you the potential of soaring all day 8-) Finding 100 fpm lift is very common on a good soaring day.... Great GAS Mileage 8-)>> Hi Mark, it was a long time ago when I was in gliding but 98fpm doesn`t mean much to me without the distance that you fly in that time. I learned to fly in a stick and string glider that would fly in a straight line about 20 miles before it hit the ground from a mile high. When I finished gliding I had a 19 metre plastic beast that would do over 40 miles from a mile high, and at nearly twice the speed. The way to go is a motor glider. Makes you independent of launching facilities, gets you home when the day goes flat and is so slipery that it gives cross country MPG undreamed of in any other machine. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 23, 2008
(anyone know how much weight is in a cubic foot of sand?).>> Hi Cristal, Your friendly local building materials supplier will probably have sand in clean prepacked plastic bags, sold by weight.. Beware as plastic bags are slippery and will be difficult to secure. <> That is the best option, but make it an experience ultrlight pilot, preferably Kolb <> Sounds about right. You could land a B-17 on 6000 feet I am in a similar position to you with only a few hours, and landings in an Xtra. I have a committment to fly someone in the village as he bought a flight in an ultralight which I put up for sale in an `Auction of Promises` fund raiser around last Christmas. He paid around $120 for the flight but I am not going to fly him until I feel a bit happier at the prospect. It will be a late evening , non thermic flight with a gentle cruise around for an hour and hopefully an equally gentle landing. I know that the guys wife is having conniptions at the thought of her beloved husband being up in the sky in `that flying motorbike`. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jun 23, 2008
Crystal, Did you have any dual instruction in your twinstar? If you did not, how did you solo it with out any instruction in it? We have plans for me to solo the next time I go fly. Probably in 2 weeks. I have a concern now. I have a Mark III with a 503. My instructor and I have been using my plane for training. He test flew the plane for me prior to the lessons. Now what should I expect flying the plane solo? The W/B says the pilot weight should be a minimum of 195#. I weight 150#. So I need at least 45# ballast to fly solo. So with the proper ballast the plane will be 120# lighter with out my instructor in it. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189249#189249 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
From: "olendorf" <olendorf(at)gmail.com>
Date: Jun 23, 2008
I'm not recommending any option but if it was me I would prefer the water barrel. I'd have a valve on it so I could let the water out if I wound up in an unstable or dangerous condition due to the extra weight. -------- Scott Olendorf Original Firestar, Rotax 447, Powerfin prop Schenectady, NY http://KolbFirestar.googlepages.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189253#189253 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2008
From: gary aman <gaman(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Cristal, One addition to the answers on passengers.The Mark has a high thrust line,and when you add weight and full power, be prepared for the tail to come up and the nose to push over immediately.Bring the trim adjustment about halfway up for passengers near 150# and keep the stick back firmly until the mains lift,then slowly reduce back pressure to maintain the climb speed and rate you need.Even the ladies will give you accurate answers when you ask about weight,a fact that surprised me at first!It won't take long before you know how much trim to add for their weight.The mark lands easier but faster when it's heavier. Enjoy your Kolb,G Aman MK-3C 2200 Jabiru 320hrs -- Original Message ---- From: pj.ladd <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 5:51:05 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar (anyone know how much weight is in a cubic foot of sand?).>> Hi Cristal, Your friendly local building materials supplier will probably have sand in clean prepacked plastic bags, sold by weight.. Beware as plastic bags are slippery and will be difficult to secure. <> That is the best option, but make it an experience ultrlight pilot, preferably Kolb <> Sounds about right. You could land a B-17 on 6000 feet I am in a similar position to you with only a few hours, and landings in an Xtra. I have a committment to fly someone in the village as he bought a flight in an ultralight which I put up for sale in an `Auction of Promises` fund raiser around last Christmas. He paid around $120 for the flight but I am not going to fly him until I feel a bit happier at the prospect. It will be a late evening , non thermic flight with a gentle cruise around for an hour and hopefully an equally gentle landing. I know that the guys wife is having conniptions at the thought of her beloved husband being up in the sky in `that flying motorbike`. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2008
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
> Cristal, You can purchase sand in 25 pound plastic bags. Does not cost very much and it is easy to load/unload and fairly clean and easy to secure in the seat. If you are worried about it shifting, purchase some light ratchet strap type mechanisms that are used to hold odd shaped loads in pickups etc. They are very inexpensive and can be used for all sorts of things. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ............................... Cristal, I failed to mention you do not have to put a full persons weight in the seat on the first flight. I am a great believer in taking incremental small steps as it prevents unwarranted surprises. Start out with 25 pounds in the seat, and add another on each succeeding flight. This will let you fly out of your normal strip and let you know if you should move to a longer strip for flying a passenger. You end up finding out what you want to know, but at lower risk, and more flights before you take up your first passenger. At each weight increase climb to altitude and check out your stall speed. If you are running out of back stick to lift the nose, you know what the maximum weight is that you can safely fly in the passenger seat. Fly safe. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Russ Kinne <russ(at)rkiphoto.com>
Subject: q
Date: Jun 23, 2008
George Alexander! pls contact me offlist thanx do not archive ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "KOLB AIRCRAFT" <customersupport(at)tnkolbaircraft.com>
Subject: Re: Information on Mark III and Kolbra
Date: Jun 23, 2008
WILLIAM, SEND ME YOUR ADDRESS , I WILL SEND YOU INFO. THANKS DONNIE. ----- Original Message ----- From: "William and/or Justina Fyfe" <wjfyfe(at)att.net> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 7:06 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Information on Mark III and Kolbra > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 23, 2008
I used 40 lb salt bags. -two at first, then three which was more than my first passenger. I strapped them in well, positioned to roughly reproduce a passenger. I recommend the method as it gives you the assurance of no surprises. The bags were "free" because I have a water softener. BB MkIII, suzuki Scottsville,NY On 23, Jun 2008, at 1:44 PM, Jack B. Hart wrote: > > >> >> > > Cristal, > > You can purchase sand in 25 pound plastic bags. Does not cost very > much and > it is easy to load/unload and fairly clean and easy to secure in > the seat. > If you are worried about it shifting, purchase some light ratchet > strap type > mechanisms that are used to hold odd shaped loads in pickups etc. > They are > very inexpensive and can be used for all sorts of things. > > Jack B. Hart FF004 > Winchester, IN > ............................... > > Cristal, > > I failed to mention you do not have to put a full persons weight in > the seat > on the first flight. I am a great believer in taking incremental > small > steps as it prevents unwarranted surprises. Start out with 25 > pounds in the > seat, and add another on each succeeding flight. This will let you > fly out > of your normal strip and let you know if you should move to a > longer strip > for flying a passenger. You end up finding out what you want to > know, but > at lower risk, and more flights before you take up your first > passenger. > > At each weight increase climb to altitude and check out your stall > speed. > If you are running out of back stick to lift the nose, you know > what the > maximum weight is that you can safely fly in the passenger seat. > > Fly safe. > > Jack B. Hart FF004 > Winchester, IN > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: William Sullivans Accident
At 08:47 PM 6/19/2008, Jack B. Hart wrote: >For a FireFly with a 27 mph stall speed, it might be better to add a 20 mph >margin... In my US, which stalls at about the same speed, I fly final at 40-45 depending on conditions. >Low inertia should/will allow quick acceleration if and only if you slam the >stick forward to get out of the stall immediately and return to flying. If >you don't do this you are in a high drag configuration with a high rate of >deceleration and loosing altitude rapidly. Actually, no. Low inertia means quick acceleration from power added, but not from gravity. The lower weight of the plane means less potential energy, too. A heavy object and a light one fall at the same rate, as Galileo proved some 400 years ago. -Dana -- When I was young I was told that anyone could be President. I'm beginning to believe it. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2008
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: William Sullivans Accident
> > >Actually, no. Low inertia means quick acceleration from power added, but >not from gravity. The lower weight of the plane means less potential >energy, too. A heavy object and a light one fall at the same rate, as >Galileo proved some 400 years ago. > Dana, In a departure stall, all the power has already been added. The only way out of it is to move the stick forward. Potential energy is a function of mass and height. If you want to fly at equal potential energies, the FireFly will have to fly at greater altitude. You are right about Galileo where the assumption is made that the objects have equal drag, but then again he was not dropping different models of Kolb aircraft. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)juno.com>
Date: Jun 23, 2008
Wow, I go off to work (yes, back to the grindstone) and come home to lots of advice and even an ellery offer (um...no thx). Waycross airport IS my normal airstrip, and I mentioned it had 6000ft to let you guys know that I know I have PLENTY of room. Grant, I don't think your instructor weighs that much either...when he flew it did he add weight? You asked about my signoff - that's a long story. I had to go to Tennessee to find an instructor familiar with Kolb. We flew a Kolb but it wasn't my Mark II, so that's why I haven't flown mine with someone in it. I know it'll carry two good size people because when I bought it the man took me up in it. After I bought it I started the process of getting the airworthiness certificate. Couldn't fly it until that was completed and once that was completed there was a five hour minimum solo flight restriction - couldn't even take up an instructor with me. Couldn't find anyone locally willing to fly off the five hours for me. And I couldn't solo my plane until someone signed me off to fly it. An endless red-tape circle! With Jim's help (to whom I am eternally grateful) I got signed off. I've flown off the five hours. I'm close to getting my private certificate. And like John said, I'm eager to take someone up with me. Not to show off, but to share the joy of flying and the wonderful view. But as I hope you all can tell from my questioning, I'm very safety conscience and I tend to follow rules closely (thus the red-tape making me go in circles searching for a loop hole or way to be able to fly my plane legally). I, like John, certainly don't want to do anything to hurt anyone or myself. Everyone seems to have differing opinions of what is safe. On the Mark II there is a middle bar that leans over into the passenger's seat making it only about 12 inches wide. If you're wider than that you have a bar jabbing you in the hip. That doesn't leave much room to add bags of anything or even a container. I mean...it's a small seat. For a quick flight around the pattern (and going up high enough to find the new approach speed) is all I'd probably take someone up for because any longer than that and they're going to have a mighty sore hip. -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189475#189475 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: fuel prices
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)juno.com>
Date: Jun 23, 2008
My uncle recently sent me this link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmqpGZv0YT4 Cut and paste it into the address bar on your internet browser. I wish they had those available now in America! -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189485#189485 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff
Date: Jun 23, 2008
From: knowvne(at)aol.com
Hi Mark, It was a long time ago when I was in gliding but 98 fpm doesn`t mean much to me without the distance that you fly in that time. =C2-I learned to fly in a stick and string glider that would fly in a stra ight line about 20 miles before it hit the ground from a mile high. When I =C2- finished gliding I had a 19 metre plastic beast that would do over 40 miles from a mile high, and at nearly twice the speed. =C2- The way to go is a motor glider. Makes you independent of launching faciliti es, gets you home when the day goes flat and is so slipery that it gives cro ss country MPG undreamed of in any other machine. =C2- Cheers =C2- Pat Pat=C2- You seem to be in a Hurry to get someplace... 8-) Thats not the goal in the Dragon... Its purpose is to soar... Beleive me you WILL be looking up at steves Dragon while your packing up you r motor glider... =C2- He may have got there slower but as the sun sets he does get there and is st ill in the air to prove it hahahaha Below are some specs the Carbon Dragon was designed to meet or exceed ..... and here is a Web site of a Photo of me soaring beside Steve in his CarbonDr agon as well as some Pix of his bird.. http://www.sailplanehomebuilders.com/steve_arndt_cd.htm Steves =C2-plane is modified and a bit lighter than the plans=C2-call fo r so his sink rate reflects this... But even a stock Carbon dragon is amazing to watch......=C2- Steves Plane is also Super Clean just like a fast XC =C2-ship would be.. Pat=C2- The purpose of a Carbon Dragon is to Exploit Micro LIft... Very Light Lift i n very small pockets.. Also to take advantage of dynamic soaring conditions... Climbing in Micro Lift =C2-is something the typical sailplane just can't d o given its speed and =C2-turn radus when thermalling..=C2- A carbon dragon can easly =C2-orbit inside the bases of a base ball field. . =C2-It has the same =C2-turn radious as your Typical Flex wing Hangglider but Half the sink rate .... =C2- I often out climb sail planes in my Hangglider because Im able to turn alot tighter and climb in=C2- the Thermals core=C2-.. Steve also does this and with =C2-half my Sink r ate so climbs much faster... Spec: =C2-Required for exploiting microlift ... mostly from Gary Osoba 100 fpm Very low sink rate=C2- =C2-25 mph Very low speed at above sink rate=C2- Extremely small thermalling circle diameter (directly related to the speed s quared ... v2)=C2- =C2-26:1=C2-=C2-A decent glide ratio at a respectable speed ... =C2- Pat BTW =C2- Todays top of the line Hangliders =C2-which we call RWs =C2-have the sam e performance as your old stick and String Glider... The =C2-difference is these gliders let you land on your feet in someones back yard 8-) Oh and it fits on the Roof of your car..8-) =C2-Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Baker" <jlbaker(at)msbit.net>
Date: Jun 23, 2008
Subject: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) X-SpamReason %%SpamReason%%: > > It doesn't just happen to Kolbers, Brother Kinne....one fine summer Sunday > morning in 1955an Eastern Air Lines Martin 404 did that very thing at Bowman > Field in Louisville. And the USAF folks have have been remiss at times..... Working the tower at Yokota AB Japan one day, and a C-5 inbound, Tachikawa AB is about 3 1/2 miles southeast of Yokota. We hear a rather frantic Japanese voice come up on guard channel, "Big-a bird on final, GO AWAY! GO AWAY!" If he had gotten in, he wouldn't have been able to get out...3700 feet at Tachi vs 11,000 at Yokota. Jim Baker 580.788.2779 Elmore City, OK ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "William and/or Justina Fyfe" <wjfyfe(at)att.net>
Subject: Text of my posts fail to show? Why?
Date: Jun 24, 2008
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2008
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Re: Text of my posts fail to show? Why?
Try selecting "Plain-text Only" as a sending option in your email client. Looks like your email client isn't following the MIME encoding rules correctly. Matt Dralle At 08:20 PM 6/23/2008 Monday, you wrote: Matt G Dralle | Matronics | PO Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 925-606-1001 V | 925-606-6281 F | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ WWW | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "William and/or Justina Fyfe" <wjfyfe(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Text of my posts fail to show? Why?
Date: Jun 24, 2008
Thanks Matt. Let's see if this works? Bill Grants Pass, Oregon ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff
Date: Jun 24, 2008
Hi Mark, really interesting How is the dragon launched, cable or just leap off a hill.? Things have obviously moved on since I flew gliders. I had a 19mtre span Jantar and only flirted with hang gliders for a short while. I have always envied the hang gliders ability to stick the whole thing on a car and travel to and from a gliding site. Home built gliders are very few and far between in the UK. I dont know anyone who has built one although there are some stirrings with a glider to operate withinn the ultralight spec at the moment. Looks as though the Dragon would be really fun. Provided you don`t want to go anywhere. It seems to me that Hangliders and paragliders are reinventing the wheel and doing everything that the the gliding movement went through in the 30`s. First the flight sticking to hills, then the venturing into thermals, then going from thermal to thermal to go cross country. The perfect answer to those who think that gliding has got too technical Somewhere there is a Dagling in which I have a =C2=A35 share. I never had the nerve to fly the thing. In my gliding club we launched it with a winch cable once. I think that with 1000ft launch the Dagling landed about 10 seconds after the cable end hit the ground. Cheers Pat . ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "boyd" <by0ung(at)brigham.net>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 24, 2008
The W/B says the pilot weight should be a minimum of 195#. I weight 150#. So I need at least 45# ballast to fly solo. So with the proper ballast the plane will be 120# lighter with out my instructor in it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you put say 10 or 15 lbs in the nose,,, would do as much or more than 45 lbs in the seat. Putting the weight in the nose will give it a much greater moment arm. And what should you expect..... take off will be only 2/3 as long and much quicker acceleration. Climb will be faster. The roll trim may be different. You will need less elevator trim... be prepared to be amazed. Boyd Young MKIIIC 912 225+ hours and counting. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 24, 2008
He paid around $120 for the flight but I am not going to fly him until I feel a bit happier at the prospect. >> Hi Cristal, I wrote the above only yesterday. Unfortunately yeterday evening was soo perfect that I took the bull by the horns, rang the guy who bought the flight and offered to fly him . Introduced the guy to the plane, did a walk round with him.Explained what I was doing and strapped him in. Fired up and taxied out. Now, the farmer has cut my field and there is hay lying everywhere, drying. The strip has been raked clear but not the taxyway. Taxied out very gingerly through the hay and went right to the end of the strip. Unusual as I usually use only a part of it. Told the passenger what was going to happen. Got him to move his hip away from the dual throttle. Move his feet away from the pedals, move his left arm so that I could operate the flaps Ran through my mental checklist Controls, ballast, straps, intsruments trim Flaps... At this point I decided that I should check to see if I had picked up a load of hay round the mains or the tailwheel. Mains clear, eased my straps to look out of the door to check the tailwheel. All OK. Tightened straps completed checklist with Canopy( left over from gliding days) it means check doors now, and Brakes, keep feet clear. Opened the throttle, tail up, speed building.... we should be in the air by now. Thinks...nil wind.....perhaps the passenger is heavier than expected...going like the clappers now....too late to stop...hedge coming up....drag the stick back and she reluctantly took off. She was flying OK but not climbing as expected. Speed was ok so I just kept going pretending to the passenger that all was normal. Arrived some time later at 1000 ft and throttled back and finally had time to think. You have got there by now. Right! . I had forgotten to set the takeoff Flap. Enough for one flight you might think. But.. Flew to our home village, passenger happily taking pics, circuited over the village and then flew on when I noticed that the oil temp was in the red and the oil pressure had dropped. Very calmly I announced that something wasn`t quite right and it would be prudent to fly back. Eased throttle and began to lose height and arrived at the strip about 10 minutes later.. Pressure was still low but the temp had eased a bit. Made a reasonable circuit apart from having to fight the passenger for the flap lever, it really is an abortion, and then I messed up the landing. Allowing for the extra weight I arrived over the hedge at about 70 instead of 60.In nil wind that was close to the ground speed. We whistled in. The touchdown itself was a greaser but we took up about three quarters of the strip wheras I am usually down in less than half. The passenger of course thought this was quite normal. Just to put the lid on everything. When I taxied in I found that the rear of the plane was covered in oil Yuck. Engine frame, prop, fuselage, tail feathers. It seems that when I changed the oil a couple of days ago I over filled it, I hadn`t done an oil change before. and the excess had blown out of the breather tube. Luckily while I was cleaning up a couple of mates landed in a Jabiru and kindly took my passenger off fora flight. Over a beer later I was happy to hear my passenger say that although the Jabiru was comfortable and quiet he preferred the Kolb beause of the visibility. If it can go wrong it will. All reminds me of a cartoon in a RAF iinstructional magazine during the war. A whole bomber crew arriving at the Pearly Gates saying "We forgot the checklist" Today luckily has been quite nice weather and I have spent the day cleaning oil from everything and arranging a bottle and a piece of hose for the blow tube to lead into. Looking forward to checking the oil temp and pressure on the next flight. cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)juno.com>
Date: Jun 24, 2008
pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com wrote: > I took the bull by the horns, rang the guy who bought the > flight and offered to fly him . > > Pat Pat, Thanks for sharing your experience. I'm glad you and your passenger made it safely home. -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189625#189625 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Subject Changed To Protect The Innocent!
Date: Jun 24, 2008
Patrick/Mark: Don't ya think you all are getting a bit far from Kolb related subject matt er? john h mkIII hauck's holler, alabama ----- Original Message ----- From: pj.ladd To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:19 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff Hi Mark, really interesting How is the dragon launched, cable or just leap off a hill.? ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff
Date: Jun 24, 2008
From: knowvne(at)aol.com
Hi Mark, really interesting=C2-=C2- How is the dragon launched, cable or just leap off=C2- a hill.? Hi Pat The Dragon Kit is designed with Bomb Bay Doors below the cockpit so you coul d foot launch it if you wanted to but Steve built his with a floor..Its so light that an Ultralite can tow it. .. =C2-He's also =C2-launched it a few times by a Car tow.. Things have obviously =C2-moved on=C2- since I flew gliders. I had a 19mtre span Jantar and only flirted with hang gliders for a short while. =C2- I have always envied the hang gliders ability to stick the whole thing on a car and travel to and from a gliding site. Pat They have indeed......=C2- Today we even have sailplanes that are Electric powered using a Folding boom =C2-that comes up behind the cockpit..=C2- The Apis Sail plane I believe even gives you the ability to recharge the Bat tery in flight by=C2-Simply raising the boom and letting the Prop wind mill as you ridge soar or climb out in that =C2-Ripper to cloud base.. 8-) Now THAT sounds like the perfect Air toy if you can afford one.. 8-) And yes HangGliders have greatly evolved as well in the past 20 years I've b een flying them.....10:1 to 20:1 Alum Tubes to carbon fiber spars .. =C2-Transporting them to various sites =C2-is a bi g plus=C2-and in fact around the world is possible... Ive flown in Sydney, AU and Hawaii ... Fun Flying Vac.... Also some gliders can now be short packed =C2-to 8 ft.. This does require some Extra assembly once your ready to set her up but its very portable and great for traveling...=C2- =C2- Home built gliders are very few and far between in the UK. I don't know anyone who has built one although there are some stirri ngs with a glider to operate within the ultralight spec at the moment. Pat=C2- I=C2-believe there is at least ONE Carbon Dragon on =C2-your side of the pond... I thought I read some place about one being built =C2-over there... =C2- Looks as though the Dragon would be really fun. Provided you don`t want to go anywhere. =C2- Well they fit in a trailer just like the Race=C2-ships do =C2-so you can GO XC and land out.. Your slow enough that your Chace crew easily keep unde r you as you go.... Its nice sometimes to have some eyes on the surface conf irming Wind Direction and slope of chosen LZ 8-) It seems to me that Hangliders and paragliders are reinventing the wheel and doing everything that the the glid ing movement went through in the 30`s. First the flight sticking to hills, then the venturing into thermals, then=C2- going from thermal to thermal to go cros s country.=C2- The fun thing about HangGliding is you often never know where you'll land... =C2-And when you do you meet some amazed people just full=C2-of Question s...=C2- They're shocked to learn you just flew 100 miles in a KITE hahahaha ... BTW =C2-I believe the Open Record is 450 miles=C2-and to a Declared Goal just under 400miles..... =C2- =C2- =C2- My longest is only 81 but have many 50 to 70 mile flights We have Oceans of trees =C2-here that we have cross over So Distance can be a reall challenge for us... I think our Area REcord is 12 5 Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 24, 2008
I took the bull by the horns, rang the guy who bought the > flight and offered to fly him . > > Pat Patrick: "Taking the bull by the horns is a good way to get gored." Glad you did not kill or injure your innocent passenger. Over the years I have been flying Kolbs, I have made it a hard and fast rule to test fly the airplane solo before I put an innocent passenger in the other seat. Do that every day I fly passengers to insujre it is good to go. If I discover there is something not normal about the airplane, or me, after I am airborne, then it is only me and the Kolb that have to deal with the problem. In the US, if we build our Kolbs to be "homebuilt/experimental category", normally, we must fly off a 40 hour test period, solo. We are not legally authorized to fly a passenger until we have flown off our test time. This gives the pilot a lot of time to get to know his airplane before he attempts to fly with a passenger. High engine oil temp and low oil pressure is a pretty good indication of an impending engine failure. But you know all that, of course. Take care, john h mkIII hauck's holler, alabama ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Subject Changed To Protect The Innocent!
Date: Jun 24, 2008
From: knowvne(at)aol.com
Hi John Yes I concede=C2-8-) =C2- Mark I love the KOLB in fact I came this close =C2-l<--->l =C2- to buying one BUT the need for such a LONG trailer to store and transport it to flying sites I want to some day visit is what d eters me.... That is a nice advantage the Trike has over Fix wings... Very Portable.... =C2- And thats probably Why they cost so damn much=C2-for what you get... 8-( Mark -----Original Message----- From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com> Sent: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 4:55 pm Subject: Kolb-List: Subject Changed To Protect The Innocent! Patrick/Mark: =C2- Don't ya think you all are getting=C2-a bit far=C2-from Kolb related subject matter? =C2- john h mkIII hauck's holler, alabama =C2- =C2- ----- Original Message ----- From: pj.ladd Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:19 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff Hi Mark, really interesting=C2-=C2- How is the dragon launched, cable or just leap off=C2- a hill.? =C2- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Subject Changed To Protect The Innocent!
Date: Jun 24, 2008
Mark: Most of us, on the Kolb List, have already made the decision to build and f ly Kolbs. I've been doing just that for many, many years and flight hours. I, personally, am not interested in trikes, hang gliders, paragliders, etc. If I was, I'd have one, and be on a List that was dedicated to them. I believe the only requirement to be a member of the Kolb List is to sign u p and keep our posts Kolb related. Not much more to it. I built my airplanes to fly, not to haul around on top of, or behind, my tr uck. john h mkIII hauck's holler, alabama That is a nice advantage the Trike has over Fix wings... Very Portable... . And thats probably Why they cost so damn much for what you get... 8-( Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 24, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Subject Changed To Protect The Innocent!
At 05:59 PM 6/24/2008, John Hauck wrote: > >I built my airplanes to fly, not to haul around on top of, or behind, my >truck. Well, lots of us (including me!) did choose a Kolb for the ability to haul it behind a truck. If I couldn't keep it in a trailer I wouldn't be flying it. -Dana -- Work is underway on drafting a new constitution for Iraq. Why don't we send them ours? It worked for 200 years, and we don't use it any more. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Subject Changed To Protect The Innocent!
Date: Jun 24, 2008
From: knowvne(at)aol.com
HI John=C2- I completely understand the=C2-fascination and focus on KOLBs... -----Original Message----- From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com> Sent: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 5:59 pm Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Subject Changed To Protect The Innocent! Mark: =C2- Most of us, on the Kolb List, have already made the decision to build and fly Kolbs.=C2- I've been doing=C2-just that for ma ny, many years and flight hours. =C2- I, personally, am not interested in trikes, hang gliders, paragliders, etc.=C2- If I was, I'd have one, and be on a List th at was dedicated to them. =C2- I believe the only requirement to be a member of the Kolb List is to sign up and keep our posts Kolb related.=C2- Not much more to it. =C2- I built my airplanes to fly, not to haul around on top of, or behind, my truck. =C2- john h mkIII hauck's holler, alabama =C2- =C2- =C2- That is a nice advantage the Trike has over Fix wings... Very Portable....=C2- And thats probably Why they cost so damn much=C2-for what you get.. 8-( Mark =C2- ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Subject Changed To Protect The Innocent!
Date: Jun 24, 2008
From: knowvne(at)aol.com
HAHAHAHAHA =C2- DANA=C2- I LOVE YOUR TAG LINE =C2-HAHAHAHA =C2- SAD TOO 8-/ MARK -----Original Message----- From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net> Sent: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 7:06 pm Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Subject Changed To Protect The Innocent! At 05:59 PM 6/24/2008, John Hauck wrote: =C2- I built my airplanes to fly, not to haul around on top of, or behind, my truck. Well, lots of us (including me!) did choose a Kolb for the ability to haul it behind a truck.=C2- If I couldn't keep it in a trailer I wouldn't be flying it. -Dana -- =C2-Work is underway on drafting a new constitution for Iraq.=C2- Why don't we send them ours?=C2- It worked for 200 years, and we don't use it any more. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Subject Changed To Protect The Innocent!
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Date: Jun 24, 2008
Dana: When I spoke of flying and not hauling, I was speaking strictly for myself. I understand there are a lot of folks that have no choice, and a lot of folks that like to put their Kolb in a trailer and haul it around behind their cars and trucks. That is the primary reason Homer has designed all his airplanes from the Ultrastar forward with folding wings. It is still a very big selling point for TNK. I have been very fortunate. Never had to trailer my Kolbs, except to get them from the shop to the airstrip, and to retrieve them when I broke them beyond their capability to fly me home. Been flying out of a little 750 grass strip in the cow pasture for more than 24 years. In fact, got a chance today to share that airstrip, the mkIII, the cows, the cow manure, antique tractors, with some mighty fine folks from Pennsylvania, Terry and Pat Frantz, my old friends from south of Smoketown, PA. Terry is the man that organizes the Homer Kolb Father's Day Flyins. Was totally surprised when they came driving in my drive pulling a popup camper, unannounced. The beauty of the whole thing is he was delayed by 30 minutes trying to find a Shell fuel station. I had returned from a trip to Mobile, Alabama, 10 minutes prior to their arrival. Had they not gotten lost trying to find the Shell Station, I would not have been at home, and we would have missed each other. We had a great visit. Always good to spend time with Kolb friends. When I make comments on the Kolb List, I make them for myself and not others. I try not to give advice, but to share what I have done right or wrong in situations that involve building and flying Kolbs. I personally do not like to get advice from people that have little or no experience flying Kolbs in matters that are pertinent to Kolbs. Guess I better get down off my soapbox. Got a bc msg to check my meds. ;-) Take care, john h mkIII hauck's holler, alabama -------- John Hauck MKIII/912ULS hauck's holler, alabama Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189666#189666 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf4347_1_160.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Subject Changed To Protect The Innocent!
Date: Jun 24, 2008
Dana: Forgot to mention in my previous response, I have quite a bit of experience trailering Kolbs. In fact, I broke my mkIII,1 July 2000, at Muncho Lake i n northern BC, Canada. Did a very good job of breaking it. It was unflyab le and would take some extensive repairs to get it flying again. The best course of action was return home to Alabama, get the truck and trailer, the n drive 3,742 miles from hauck's holler, alabama, to Muncho Lake, BC. Took a couple days to configure the trailer, load the mkIII, secure it, and dep art for Oshkosh. We made it to OSH the first day of the flyin, mkIII in to w. From OSH back home was another thousand miles and a couple more days. Took 30 days from the time I crashed until I got the mkIII home. Some of you may have been at OSH that year. I gave a briefing on how to cu t a flight to Barrow, AK, OSH, and home, short in flight hours, but long in driving and hauling. Take care, john h mkIII Well, lots of us (including me!) did choose a Kolb for the ability to ha ul it behind a truck. If I couldn't keep it in a trailer I wouldn't be fly ing it. -Dana ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 24, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Subject Changed To Protect The Innocent!
At 08:41 PM 6/24/2008, John Hauck wrote: >... 3,742 miles... I gave a briefing on how to cut a flight to Barrow, AK, >OSH, and home, short in flight hours, but long in driving and hauling. That's a l-o-n-g drive! And I thought my 570 mile round trip seemed long... Thought it seems a lot longer when you know you have a bent axle... and as you know it's a good thing it wasn't even one mile longer... -Dana -- The Bill of Rights goes too far--it should have stopped at "Congress shall make no law". ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "William and/or Justina Fyfe" <wjfyfe(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Text of my posts fail to show? Why?
Date: Jun 25, 2008
OK. Lemme try? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "William and/or Justina Fyfe" <wjfyfe(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Text of my posts fail to show? Why?
Date: Jun 25, 2008
It works! Thanks Matt! Bill Grants Pass, Oregon ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "William and/or Justina Fyfe" <wjfyfe(at)att.net>
Subject: Questions about the Mark III and Kolbra
Date: Jun 25, 2008
Here are my thoughts and maybe some of you can advise me on my sanity. We presently own a 150HP Cessna 150. A great airplane for most of what we have done with it. But very recently we have decided that we just are not that interested any more in the longer cross country flying. So, I am looking for an airplane that is more suitable doing low and slow just for local pursuits. An airplane that is capable of those shorter, rough airstrips. Or, possibly no airstrip at all. Something with good visibility. One that folds down easily for transport so we can take the airplane with us when we travel if we choose. What do some of you think? Is the Kolb the right aircraft for us? Thanks! Bill Grants Pass, Oregon ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WhiskeyVictor36(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 24, 2008
Subject: Re: Questions about the Mark III and Kolbra
In a message dated 6/24/2008 11:05:20 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, wjfyfe(at)att.net writes: What do some of you think? Is the Kolb the right aircraft for us? Bill, YEP! Kolb is the only one. Bill Varnes Original Kolb FireStar Audubon NJ Do Not Archive **************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 25, 2008
"Taking the bull by the horns is a good way to get gored." Hi John,Good one. I will remember that. After all my good advice to Cristal about being properly prepared, I had to get it all wrong. <> I had flown the day before. What I hadn`t done was fly since my oil change. I dont see quite how , until I investigate further, but I suspect that the low pressure and the high temps were related to the oil change somehow. Hot oil on the sensor perhaps? I drained the oil out yesterday and only refilled to a much lower level. Ground ran the engine for a long period (It was too rough to fly) and evrything seems OK. I good grind around the patch within gliding distance of my strip seems to be indicated before going further. Luckily most of the hayfields are cut so there are plenty of big field to put her down in if the worst happens. I managed not to scare my passenger anyhow. . He rang me up to thank me for the flight and asked to fly again. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: ...olb-List: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff
Date: Jun 25, 2008
.Its so light that an Ultralite can tow it...>> Hi Mark I think that is done pretty regularly here. The rest of your post just shows how out of touch I am. Back to Kolbs Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Subject Changed To Protect The Innocent!
Date: Jun 25, 2008
Patrick/Mark: Don't ya think you all are getting a bit far from Kolb related subject matter?>> Quite right John. I consider my wrist slapped. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 25, 2008
Pat, Thanks for sharing your experience.>> Hi Cristal, Glad you liked it, and learned from it, I hope.. At least my stupidity can do someone a bit of good. They say that bad things happen in threes. In this case It was 1) Absolutely zero wind, 2) Not putting in enough trim to compensate for the passenger weight. 3) Missing the flap setting from my interrupted Check list. Good .luck. Keep us posted with your progress. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 25, 2008
From: gary aman <gaman(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Pat, What powers your Kolb? ----- Original Message ---- From: pj.ladd <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 5:39:25 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar "Taking the bull by the horns is a good way to get gored." Hi John,Good one. I will remember that. After all my good advice to Cristal about being properly prepared, I had to get it all wrong. <> I had flown the day before. What I hadn`t done was fly since my oil change. I dont see quite how , until I investigate further, but I suspect that the low pressure and the high temps were related to the oil change somehow. Hot oil on the sensor perhaps? I drained the oil out yesterday and only refilled to a much lower level. Ground ran the engine for a long period (It was too rough to fly) and evrything seems OK. I good grind around the patch within gliding distance of my strip seems to be indicated before going further. Luckily most of the hayfields are cut so there are plenty of big field to put her down in if the worst happens. I managed not to scare my passenger anyhow. . He rang me up to thank me for the flight and asked to fly again. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Pilot Error
Date: Jun 25, 2008
With all this non Kolb stuff I figured I could send this. I didn't write this. My ex-wife started taking flying lessons about the time our divorce started and she got her license shortly before our divorce was final, later that same year. Yesterday afternoon, she narrowly escaped injury in the aircraft she was piloting when she was forced to make an emergency landing in Southern Tennessee because of bad weather. Thank God our kids were with me at the Beach House this weekend. The NTSB issued a preliminary report, citing pilot error: Judy was flying a single engine aircraft in IFR (instrument flight rating) conditions while only having obtained a VFR (visual flight rating) rating. The absence of a post-crash fire was likely due to insufficient fuel on board. No one on the ground was injured. The photograph below was taken at the scene and shows the extent of damage to her aircraft. She was very lucky. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Lee/Cannon" <leecannon(at)telus.net>
Subject: why can't I see photos
Date: Jun 25, 2008
Can anyone tell me why I can't see photos which people attach ? thanks, Rob ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Pilot Error
Date: Jun 25, 2008
With all this non Kolb stuff I figured I could send this.>> Watch it. John H will be after you. Very funny though. Still chuckling Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 25, 2008
What powers your Kolb? I have a Jabiru. The only engine which is cleared for use on the Xtra in the UK. The others put the weight above the ultralight limit. Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jerry Jones <maderah2(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 25, 2008
Pat, What prop are you using with your Jab and how many blades? Three blades on a pusher are reported to be considerably quieter than two, but wooden props are normally recommended, though perhaps difficult to find. I've got a Jab on another bird and am considering hanging it on a Kolb, but not certain which one. Kinda miss the Firestar I had and slewing sideways in a crosswind now and then. Jerry On Jun 25, 2008, at 12:54 PM, pj.ladd wrote: > What powers your Kolb? > > I have a Jabiru. The only engine which is cleared for use on the > Xtra in the UK. The others put the weight above the ultralight limit. > > Pat > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: ...olb-List: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff
Date: Jun 25, 2008
From: knowvne(at)aol.com
Yes even a KOLB with a Tow hook =C2-could tow it up.. 8-) Mark -----Original Message----- From: pj.ladd <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com> Sent: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 5:44 am Subject: Kolb-List: ...olb-List: Re: Why Teach Out Dated Stuff .Its so light that an Ultralite can tow it...>> =C2- Hi Mark =C2- I think that is done pretty regularly here. =C2- The rest of your post just shows how out of touch I am. =C2- Back to Kolbs =C2- Cheers =C2- Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: why can't I see photos
From: "robcannon" <leecannon(at)telus.net>
Date: Jun 25, 2008
thanks, folks.........I think it was the "old list" cheers, Rob [Wink] Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189833#189833 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Aileron Spades, Lighten Stick Forces and Improve Roll Rates.
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 25, 2008
The roll forces on my MK III have always been heavy which is annoying but flyable since the Kolb is very stable... My biggest concern is that the rate of roll on my MK III Xtra has always been pretty slow, which can be dangerous in certain situations. I have always felt that if I got banked sharply close to the ground such as in wake turbulence or in a Rotor off a hanger that I would have a hard time rolling the plane back to level quickly. I have seen where a number of people have done mods to their Kolbs to give more mechanical advantage to moving the ailerons, which helps reduce the stick forces for normal slow roll rates, but it useless for improving the rate of roll. The problem is that the aileron actuator tube that runs from the cage along the trailing edge of the wing to the aileron will twist instead of moving the aileron if a large movement is commanded in flight. If you want to test this for yourself, move the stick to each limit on the ground, and watch how much your aileron deflects... Then move the stick to each limit in flight in the air and you will see that the aileron deflects less than half of what it did on the ground, that is the tube twisting which acts like a spring in the stick... Essentially most of the stick travel is being wasted in the spring effect of the tube twisting instead of moving the aileron. My solution was to put Aileron Spades on my MK III Xtra. Spades use aerodynamic forces actually make the aileron deflect easier, not just a mechanical advantage, so the aileron actuator tube twisting is much less of a problem. I designed the spade brackets to fit right on to the aileron tube, and had Kolb fabricate them. Dennis at Kolb did an incredible job of making a very strong steel bracket that makes my spades more rigid than the spades found 200 MPH Decathlon that shares my hanger. Each spade is attached to its aileron tube with 48 rivets and leveled to within 1/3 of a degree to the bottom of each aileron. Spades are common and used on many different type of aircraft, including some airplanes that are in the same weight and speed speed class as our Kolbs ( Many Rans Models and others ). Aileron spades are a well tested, accepted, and proven way to make aileron forces lighter. As with anything in aviation, close attention must be paid to detail with this modification... A poorly mounted, or incorrectly positioned spade will very possibly result in an uncontrollable roll and a crash. The spades have helped lighten the roll forces of the MK III considerably, I now feel very good about the rate of roll, with the added benefit of light feeling ailerons that are more balanced with the light forces of the elevator. I am also much happier with the way my Kolb feels and flies with the addition of spades, it also feels much better in turbulence since I have the ability to quickly and easily correct any banks caused by conditions. Very thorough flight testing, and many hours of normal flying have shown the addition of aileron spades on my Kolb to work very well with no undesirable results. Attached are some pictures. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189848#189848 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/ultralightkolbspadeconstructiondetail05_2008_43_211.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/ultralightkolbspadeconstructiondetail05_2008_30_775.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/ultralightkolbspadeconstructiondetail05_2008_18_141.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/ultralightaerialkolbspadedetailfloridahomestead06_02_2008_31_742.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Denny Rowe" <rowedenny(at)windstream.net>
Subject: Re: Mk 3 steel main gear legs
Date: Jun 25, 2008
Richard, If you still have the gear legs I am finally ready to pay up. I recall the price was $250 plus $25 shipping. Let me know if you still want to sale them and I will get a check in the mail. Denny Rowe ----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Girard To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 9:38 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Mk 3 steel main gear legs Yep, still on my "parts I'll use someday" rack. Rick On 7/16/07, Denny Rowe wrote: Rich, Do you still have the gear legs? Denny ----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Girard To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 8:36 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Mk 3 steel main gear legs Colder than a well digger's knee caps here, I woosed out last night, but got a picture today. Still in TNK tape and factory insert up to here lines. Rick On 2/1/07, Denny Rowe wrote: Are "these" ----- Original Message ----- From: Denny Rowe To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 2:50 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Mk 3 steel main gear legs Are this legs for a Mk-3 Classic? Do you still have them? Pic? Denny Rowe rowedenny(at)windstream.net ----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Girard To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 11:44 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Mk 3 steel main gear legs When I was in the midst of main gear straightening caused by my horrible landing technique, I thought the way out was TNK's steel gear legs. Now that I am pretty happy with my landings, I know I'm not going to install them. $350 for the pair, plus shipping. Rick -- Rick Girard "Ya'll drop on in" takes on a whole new meaning when you live at the airport. href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List"> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List href="http://forums.matronics.com"> http://forums.matronics.com -------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 1/26/2007 11:11 AM href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List"> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List href="http://forums.matronics.com"> http://forums.matronics.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 1/31/2007 3:16 PM http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List http://forums.matronics.com -- Rick Girard "Ya'll drop on in" takes on a whole new meaning when you live at the airport. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Date: 2/1/2007 2:28 PM http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List http://forums.matronics.com when you live at the airport. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7/14/2007 3:36 PM ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Denny Rowe" <rowedenny(at)windstream.net>
Subject: Re: Mk 3 steel main gear legs
Date: Jun 25, 2008
Guys and Gals, Sorry about that last post, did not mean for it to be on the list. Denny ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: why can't I see photos
Date: Jun 26, 2008
this picture of "Marilyn Monroe".>> I think maybe your computer is bent. Cheers Pat :-) ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Kolb Sales
From: "alking50" <alking737(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jun 26, 2008
I recent retired (2nd time) and have been doing my research for a build and fly project. The Kolb MrkIII Extra is definitely a finalist. Since I live in Asia I have not had an opportunity to see and fly one. I called the factory to make an appointment to come there for a look and to test fly the Extra. Dennis told me it was doubtful if I could fly one because there is no qualified pilot around. I explained that I was going to travel 8000 miles to come see and make my final decision based on what I saw and how it flew. He just said I cant promise you any thing but I'll make a call or two. Just makes me wonder how they ever imagine selling an airplane with out a test flight. Did they ever make a call to their competition? They have a totally different attitude even offering transportation and lodging. Maybe he did not think I was serious but seems if a guy will travel that far he may be a little interested. Well I changed m plans and will go see another aircraft. I will be in Seattle area July 10 to 14 and would love to make contact with an owner around there. I would appreciate any help in that regard. I still like the airplane but... Al. King Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189887#189887 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: David Key <dhkey(at)msn.com>
Subject: Kolb Sales
Date: Jun 26, 2008
You're not the first one to wonder about the companies sales strategy. I wi ll confim that they will do anything durring the building process to suppor t you, I made many calls and got immeadate assistance. > Subject: Kolb-List: Kolb Sales> From: alking737(at)yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 26 age posted by: "alking50" > > I recent retired (2nd ti me) and have been doing my research for a build and fly project. The Kolb M rkIII Extra is definitely a finalist. Since I live in Asia I have not had a n opportunity to see and fly one. I called the factory to make an appointme nt to come there for a look and to test fly the Extra. Dennis told me it wa s doubtful if I could fly one because there is no qualified pilot around. I explained that I was going to travel 8000 miles to come see and make my fi nal decision based on what I saw and how it flew. He just said I cant promi se you any thing but I'll make a call or two.> > Just makes me wonder how t hey ever imagine selling an airplane with out a test flight. Did they ever make a call to their competition? They have a totally different attitude ev en offering transportation and lodging. Maybe he did not think I was seriou s but seems if a guy will travel that far he may be a little interested. We ll I changed m plans and will go see another aircraft. I will be in Seattle area July 10 to 14 and would love to make contact with an owner around the re. I would appreciate any help in that regard. I still like the airplane b ut...> > Al. King> > > > > Read this topic online here:> > http://forums.ma ==================> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb Sales
Date: Jun 26, 2008
I still like the airplane but... > > Al. King Hi Al: Welcome to the Kolb List. Where in Asia do you live? Asia is a pretty big continent. TNK is a very small company. That means they have 4 full time employees, President, Donnie Sizemore; Parts and Sales, Travis Brown; Ken does fabrication; and Dennis is the welder. You were speaking with the welder because one of his secondary duties is to answer the phone if Travis and Donnie are not available. Why don't you give TNK another call and talk to the Pres? TNK is more than an airplane experience. They are more like family, once you join them. Don't think you can expect that type treatment from the larger airplane companies. I have flown the new MKIIIx. It is a terrific airplane. john hauck mkIII Titus, Alabama ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Kolb Sales
From: "alking50" <alking737(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jun 26, 2008
Thanks to each on of you that took the time to respond to my ranting. I Understand now more about the company. I really appreciator your replays to me. I will be at Arlington and hopefully Ill find some proud KOLB owners there. Im looking forward oto meeting many of you in the future. Thanks again, Allan King -------- Allan L. King Continental Airlines Retired and loving it! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189916#189916 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 26, 2008
What prop are you using with your Jab and how many blades?>> Hi Jerry, prop is 2 blade, wooden GT/157. 157 cms dia X 98cms pitch. The dealer reports better performance with the Prince `P` tip. I have found the combination very noisy indeed although I think it can only be the result of the `pusher` configuration as Jabi`s in normal tractor config are super quiet. I would like to run the exhausts so that it is expelled outside the diameter of the prop to see if that makes it quieter. Unfortunately it would be pretty expensive to get a one off system made and there would be a weight penalty.We do not have your freedom to experiment and a change like that would need permission for a modification from the Light Aircraft Assoc. Incidentally if anyone on the list has a noise problem, and a solution, I would be pleased to hear about it. The ordinary noise from a 912 and a Jabi are pretty similar so any comments would probably be valid Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 26, 2008
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: Aileron Spades, Lighten Stick Forces and Improve Roll
Rates. > > ............................. >My solution was to put Aileron Spades on my MK III Xtra. Spades use aerodynamic forces actually make the aileron deflect easier, not just a mechanical advantage, so the aileron actuator tube twisting is much less of a problem. I designed the spade brackets to fit right on to the aileron tube, and had Kolb fabricate them. Dennis at Kolb did an incredible job of making a very strong steel bracket that makes my spades more rigid than the spades found 200 MPH Decathlon that shares my hanger. Each spade is attached to its aileron tube with 48 rivets and leveled to within 1/3 of a degree to the bottom of each aileron. ............................. > Mike, I am pleased they have worked out for you. How did you decide on the moment arm length, the spade area, and the number of holes to attach it to the aileron tube? Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 26, 2008
Patrick: We aren't flying Cessna Citations or Lear Jets. Some of us are building th ese things in the basement and flying them out of cow pastures. They are n oisy as Hell and I don't know that anyone has built a quiet one yet. I thi nk the problem is the engine and prop are on the wrong end. When I am at L akeland and OSH, I am always amazed at how quiet the tractors are, powered with the same prop and engine I have. Get a good ANR headset, learn how to fly your airplane, see if you can get to TBO next year, and enjoy the Hell out of it. I plan on doing that, if I can. Tomorrow morning flying to Harris Field, R aleigh, MS, home of Paul Petty's ex-Father-In-Law. Going to do some Kolbra tweaking, get a BFR out of the way, eat some home grown vegetables and fri ed chicken. Hope to beat the thunderstorms by getting out of here early in the morning, and back home again early tomorrow morning. A 400 mile round trip flight is good for the soul. Haven't done a cross country since I re turned from out West the first of June. Two weeks until John Bickham's Nauga Field Flyin at Star Hill, LA. Everyon e is invited. Prefer flying in, but if you can't fly, hitch a ride and get there the best way you can. I can assure you you will have a ball. These folks know how to take care of their guests. Most of the old gang that fl ew cross country flights with John W will be there to honor our old buddy, tell lies, eat good, and maybe play a little Knock Knock Poker if the weath er turns sour. See ya'll there!!! Take care, john h mkIII 2,800+ hours and counting in the old mkIII, Miss P'fer (p fer plane) Incidentally if anyone on the list has a noise problem, and a solution, I would be pleased to hear about it. The ordinary noise from a 912 and a Ja bi are pretty similar so any comments would probably be valid Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Archives searches
Date: Jun 26, 2008
> I hope I haven't offended anyone. There IS a reason why we are supposed to stay on the subject of KOLBS and related items. (Not just to irritate John!) > > Have a nice day. > Mike Welch > MkIII CX (building) Mike: Who said I was irritated. You took that for granted. I wasn't frowning or snarling as I typed those emails. In fact, I think I added a smiley face to let you all know I was my same "old" contented, happy, mellowed out self. Takes more than a couple shit birds to irritate me. After having an Infantry Company a couple years and an Officer Student Aviation Company for a year, the only thing that bothers me is someone leaning on my Kolb or putting finger prints on the windshield. ;-) There is definitely a reason for Matt's suggested guidelines for operation of the Kolb List. If it strays too far away from center, it becomes a hang glider or truck repair list. I'm here because I like Kolbs. I also like a lot of other stuff too, dirt bikes, ATVs, antique tractors, boating, RV'ing, but it doesn't have a place on the Kolb List. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Quiet Kolb
From: "robcannon" <leecannon(at)telus.net>
Date: Jun 26, 2008
I am making a quiet Kolb [Shocked] , I hope ! How quiet it will be is yet to be seen (Heard). HKS with stock upward pointed exhaust (apparently meets strict European noise standard) whatever that means, and a four blade 65" powerfin prop.........should be running in a week or so. Any guesses on how quiet it will be? Rob Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189936#189936 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 26, 2008
From: gary aman <gaman(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Pat, Noise is a problem.Here is a picture of my home made exhaust system.Also requires sealing the fuselage tube to keep exhaust from coming up the tube. ----- Original Message ---- From: pj.ladd <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:36:46 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar What prop are you using with your Jab and how many blades?>> Hi Jerry, prop is 2 blade, wooden GT/157. 157 cms dia X 98cms pitch. The dealer reports better performance with the Prince `P` tip. I have found the combination very noisy indeed although I think it can only be the result of the `pusher` configuration as Jabi`s in normal tractor config are super quiet. I would like to run the exhausts so that it is expelled outside the diameter of the prop to see if that makes it quieter. Unfortunately it would be pretty expensive to get a one off system made and there would be a weight penalty.We do not have your freedom to experiment and a change like that would need permission for a modification from the Light Aircraft Assoc. Incidentally if anyone on the list has a noise problem, and a solution, I would be pleased to hear about it. The ordinary noise from a 912 and a Jabi are pretty similar so any comments would probably be valid Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Quiet Kolb
Date: Jun 26, 2008
Any guesses on how quiet it will be? Rob > Rob: You might have something there. What model Kolb is it? Some folks are chasing low fuel burn, some stealth Kolbs, and the rest of us are trying to squeeze all the HP we can out of those little noisy props and engines, to have a blast. Nice thing about building and flying Kolbs, you can build and fly'em like you want to. Thank goodness we don't have to comply with all the noise, and other restrictions, our overseas friends have to. That would take a lot of fun out of our sport, here in the States. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "JR" <jrsmith2(at)triad.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Quiet Kolb
Date: Jun 26, 2008
Very interested in this project... we need to cut noise, its just a matter of time until conplaints are filed and we are make to quieten our Kolbs. ----- Original Message ----- From: "robcannon" <leecannon(at)telus.net> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:05 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Quiet Kolb > > I am making a quiet Kolb [Shocked] , I hope ! How quiet it will be is yet > to be seen (Heard). HKS with stock upward pointed exhaust (apparently > meets strict European noise standard) whatever that means, and a four > blade 65" powerfin prop.........should be running in a week or so. Any > guesses on how quiet it will be? Rob > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189936#189936 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Checked by AVG. 8:00 AM ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 26, 2008
.Here is a picture of my home made exhaust system.>> Hi, I had something on those lines in mind. Did it accomplish anything? Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Quiet Kolb
Date: Jun 26, 2008
. HKS with stock upward pointed exhaust (apparently meets strict European noise standard) whatever that means, >> Hi Rob, HKS is reputedly a pretty quiet engine. My exhaust are swept forward and point at the sky. European Standards vary from country to country at the moment we are heading for more integration. Germany I think has the most stringent noise levels if you can get down to those levels beware taxying. You can knock over a pedestrian without him hearing you coming Pat. . ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jerry Jones <maderah2(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 26, 2008
Pat, As a former Jab-powered Titan driver, both the four and the six, and now in a tractor, I can vouch for what you say. Pushers are inherently noisy because the propeller is chopping disturbed air from over the wings. With a 2-blade, both blades are chopping at the same time, kinda doubling the noise produced, hence the advantage of a 3- blade is that only one blade is chopping the air. Another lesson learned is that shorter props, and hence less tip speed, are quieter. I was swinging 58 inch props which were much quieter than friends who put on 62 inch props. Warp drive props, I have since learned, are presumably okay for the Jabs, and hence a 3-blade setup is possible. Jerry On Jun 26, 2008, at 7:36 AM, pj.ladd wrote: > What prop are you using with your Jab and how many blades?>> > > Hi Jerry, > prop is 2 blade, wooden GT/157. 157 cms dia X 98cms pitch. > > The dealer reports better performance with the Prince `P` tip. > > I have found the combination very noisy indeed although I think it > can only be the result of the `pusher` configuration as Jabi`s in > normal tractor config are super quiet. > > I would like to run the exhausts so that it is expelled outside the > diameter of the prop to see if that makes it quieter. Unfortunately > it would be pretty expensive to get a one off system made and there > would be a weight penalty.We do not have your freedom to experiment > and a change like that would need permission for a modification > from the Light Aircraft Assoc. > > Incidentally if anyone on the list has a noise problem, and a > solution, I would be pleased to hear about it. The ordinary noise > from a 912 and a Jabi are pretty similar so any comments would > probably be valid > > Cheers > > Pat > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jerry Jones <maderah2(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 26, 2008
Oh, yeah, Pat, another claimed way to reduce noise was to install a prop extension, pushing the prop back one to three inches. Jerry On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:09 AM, gary aman wrote: > Pat, > Noise is a problem.Here is a picture of my home made exhaust > system.Also requires sealing the fuselage tube to keep exhaust from > coming up the tube. > > > Incidentally if anyone on the list has a noise problem, and a > solution, I would be pleased to hear about it. The ordinary noise > from a 912 and a Jabi are pretty similar so any comments would > probably be valid > > Cheers > > Pat > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 26, 2008
We aren't flying Cessna Citations or Lear Jets. Some of us are flying them out of cow pastures. They are noisy as Hell and I don't know that anyone has built a quiet one yet.>> Hi John, I fly from a cow pasture too, but we just do not have the room that you do in the States. You can`t start an engine here without annoying somebody and unless you get the plane noise certificated you will not fly. I am noise legal but it is still noisy. The guy who owns the strip is very twitchy as there is a movement in the local village to close it. In spite of the fact that it has been there more than 30 years. The trouble is a complaint to the local Council is almost always carried through in spite of the hundreds in the area who do NOT complain. Consequently we never do circuits or fly close to the strip. Take off and fly away is the rule. << I think the problem is the engine and prop are on the wrong end. When I am at Lakeland and OSH, I am always amazed at how quiet the tractors are, powered with the same prop and engine I have.>> Ithink you are right. A Jabiru flew into my strip a couple of days ago and it was like a sewing machine.Almost noiselss at 300 feet. <> Tried to get a ANR retrofit for my headphones. Would you believe that the series I have are the only ones in the manufacturers range which cannot be converted . In any case I am not particularly bothered, its other people. This week from 1500 ft I broke up an open air Shakespeare play rehearsal.. I have been threatened with sudden death if I pull the same stunt on a performance night.. learn how to fly your airplane, and enjoy the Hell out of it.>> I am learning and I am really enjoying it << Hope to beat the thunderstorms by getting out of here early in the morning,>> We have the hell of a thunderstorm going on at the moment. Rain is sheeting down and its the first night of the Outdoor Shakespeare performance. Wendy is in it and will NOT be pleased.. Two weeks until John Bickham's Nauga Field Flyin at Star Hill, LA. Everyone is invited. Prefer flying in, but if you can't fly, hitch a ride and get there the best way you can.>> Definitely will not be making it to the States this year Say `Hello` to all those I met at MV last year. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Date: Jun 26, 2008
Pushers are inherently noisy because the propeller is chopping disturbed air from over the wings.>> Hi Jerry, that is about the conclusion I have come to. Messing with props is again not a simple operation here. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Quiet Kolb
Date: Jun 26, 2008
A few years ago I had a muffler on my Redrive VW. When I took it off to find out if I would get more power without it I also found that it made no more noise than It did with the muffler on. At least in side the cockpit it is no more noisy. I have never heard the noise from out side but I'm told that my straight pipe VW sounds considerably better on a over flight (I don't know if it is more quiet or just lower pitch) than a muffled Rotax. My first engine mount used the stock Kolb mount which allowed my redrive VW to move around quite a bit and was fairly quiet inside the cockpit. One day I even took my head sets off to see if I could fly without them.......I put them right back on. When I switched to the new lower custom engine mount the inside noise increased quite a bit. I currently fly with MP3 player headphones stuck in my ears under my noise canceling aviation headphones. I have tried stopping the noise with noise reducing foam in the gap seal and behind the cockpit with little benefit. I think the biggest noise source is the prop and engine vibrations. Select a prop with the lowest tip speed and use the softest vibration dampers (engine Mounts) you can get hold of. Stock Kolb vibration dampers are pretty good too bad I can't use them. Of course shorter props will produce less thrust and too soft a engine mount may allow the engine to twist out of alignment (not a good thing). My $.02 worth. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIC ----- Original Message ----- From: "robcannon" <leecannon(at)telus.net> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:05 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Quiet Kolb > > I am making a quiet Kolb [Shocked] , I hope ! How quiet it will be is yet > to be seen (Heard). HKS with stock upward pointed exhaust (apparently > meets strict European noise standard) whatever that means, and a four > blade 65" powerfin prop.........should be running in a week or so. Any > guesses on how quiet it will be? Rob > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189936#189936 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Quiet Kolb
From: "robcannon" <leecannon(at)telus.net>
Date: Jun 26, 2008
The airstrip I live at has serious noise rules. The owners have basically said "no ultralights". If I annoy the neighbors, I'm out. So.........I am hoping this combo will be quiet. (Kolb Twinstar / hks ) - as a matter of general interest, the twinstar with the hks, custom fuel tanks, twin facets, gascolator(it all adds up) minimal fairings, weighs 460 lbs. With a gross weight of 750, it's a one and a half person plane. And probably better as a single seater. cheers, Rob Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189962#189962 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Russ Kinne <russ(at)rkiphoto.com>
Subject: Re: noise
Date: Jun 26, 2008
In re noise -- I think everyone would like to have a quieter plane, whether it affects their flying permissions or not. I recall the Lockheed 'quiet plane' they developed for Vietnam use. It was astonishingly quiet, mainly due to a huge slow-turning tractor prop on a shaft above the fuselage. Kolbs can't do that; no help there. But the exhaust was fairly large in diameter and aimed upward. I read that one Kolb installation had the exhausts aimed up and FORWARD. I'd think that would produce too much back-pressure, but if it works? They've done a lot of things with 'tuned exhausts' on VW dune buggies -- that might be close enough to have some practicality for kolbs . Who's got some experience here? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: Quiet Kolb
Date: Jun 26, 2008
It may be quiet.... and slow. That 4 blade powerfin is waay too much prop for the HKS unless you will be pushing a trike. What kind of Kolb are you putting it on? If you pitch it for 5000 engine rpm you will be creeping through the sky unless that model is a turbo. My one liter suzuki makes about what the 680cc HKS ( published) HP is at similar engine rpms. I have run a three blade 65" powerfin on it and got reasonable performance but not as long-legged as my 2 blade 70" WarpDrive. BB, MKIII Scottsville, NY On 26, Jun 2008, at 2:05 PM, robcannon wrote: > > I am making a quiet Kolb [Shocked] , I hope ! How quiet it will be > is yet to be seen (Heard). HKS with stock upward pointed exhaust > (apparently meets strict European noise standard) whatever that > means, and a four blade 65" powerfin prop.........should be running > in a week or so. Any guesses on how quiet it will be? Rob > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189936#189936 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Quiet Kolb
From: "robcannon" <leecannon(at)telus.net>
Date: Jun 26, 2008
sorry - forgot to mention 3:47 gearbox Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189970#189970 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jerry Jones <maderah2(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Quiet Kolb
Date: Jun 26, 2008
A good thing about the 4-blade setup is they are likely to be shorter with less tip speed, thereby reducing noise. Howsomever, if there is any truth to the idea that two blades cutting across the wing air at the same time are noiser, then using only three of the four might be quieter still--save the 4th for a backup replacement. Also, will 4- blades interfere with wing folding? Jerry > > It may be quiet.... and slow. That 4 blade powerfin is waay too > much prop for the HKS unless > you will be pushing a trike. What kind of Kolb are you putting it on? > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 26, 2008
From: gary aman <gaman(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar
Pat, Would you prefer the truth or do you want me to tell you how much it helped?I lined the entire cabin and over head center cover with 1/2" denso foam sound control foam.Doesn't weigh much and now I can actually use the intercom at 2700 rpm,but not at full throttle.It's not the engine,it's the prop.It sounds so good at 1800 I wish it would fly at that rpm.I really thought that a geared engine would get the prop noise down to a tolerable level,but I can't address that.I think Mr. Pike has made some cabin mods that may be more productive in suppling cleaner air flow to the prop,which may reduce noise.Like John said,I guess I'll just have to get OVER it and enjoy the flight! ----- Original Message ---- From: pj.ladd <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:37:09 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Adding a passenger to the Twinstar .Here is a picture of my home made exhaust system.>> Hi, I had something on those lines in mind. Did it accomplish anything? Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: Quiet Kolb
Date: Jun 26, 2008
So you figure on turning the prop about 1800. I was turning my three blade 65" powerfin about 2100. They have a broad thrust producing chord so it might work for you at the lower RPM. Keep us posted. BB On 26, Jun 2008, at 5:53 PM, robcannon wrote: > > sorry - forgot to mention 3:47 gearbox > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189970#189970 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Quiet Kolb
From: "Ralph B" <ul15rhb(at)juno.com>
Date: Jun 26, 2008
robcannon > sorry - forgot to mention 3:47 gearbox Did you guys know that if you make a mistake that it can be corrected after the post is submitted with the "edit" button to the right. It will go back into your post and you can make the correction without having to make a new post. Ralph -------- Ralph B Original Firestar 447 N91493 E-AB 21 years flying it Kolbra 912UL N20386 0 years flying it Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=190001#190001 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steven Green" <Kolbdriver(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Aileron Spades, Lighten Stick Forces and Improve Roll Rates.
Date: Jun 26, 2008
Mike, Just a note of caution. I considered spades 6 years ago for my Mark III, even started fabrication. When seeking opinions about spades on the Kolb wing I was advised to take it easy if I did install them. Aileron deflection puts additional load on the TE of the wing. I was told that the standard configuration can withstand about all the force you can put on the stick, but with "power steering" it may be possible to overstress the wing and fail the ribs near the trailing edge. I did not proceed any further. Steven Green ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Aileron Spades, Lighten Stick Forces and Improve Roll Rates.
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 26, 2008
Steven Green wrote: > Mike, > > Just a note of caution. > > I considered spades 6 years ago for my Mark III, even started fabrication. > When seeking opinions about spades on the Kolb wing I was advised to take it > easy if I did install them. Aileron deflection puts additional load on the > TE of the wing. I was told that the standard configuration can withstand > about all the force you can put on the stick, but with "power steering" it > may be possible to overstress the wing and fail the ribs near the trailing > edge. > > I did not proceed any further. > > Steven Green I thought about spades for my FS II also. It didn't have the strongest aileron response either, tho it had the lightest controls of any airplane I've ever flown. I too was advised about the additional loads that could have been imposed on the wing and ailerons themselves if the spades had been added. So I never did actually tr it. My titan has spades on the ailerons but the wing, aileron and attach hinges are noticeably significantly thicker, stronger and etc. The airfoil is different as well so it's just got loads of aileron and can handle spades. The kolb wings still strike me as pretty strong, but probably still getting close to a limit with the extra deflection. I resolved the issue by not flying my FS II in bad weather and just letting the brave guys call me names.... It was more fun to fly in smooth morning or evening conditions anyway. In fact that's still how I fly and I still get called names ;)..... LS -------- LS FS II Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=190023#190023 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Quiet Kolb
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)juno.com>
Date: Jun 26, 2008
I like my Kolb loud...let's me know she's running. It's when she gets quiet that gets me a little anxious. Haven't heard any noise complaints here (yet anyways). Guess the prisoners and guards right next to the airport have gotten used to it (who ever had the "brilliant" idea of building a prison right next to an airport I'll never know). Was a beautiful evening for flying. Got down just before sunset. Change of gear box oil seemed to do it some good. Whoever changed it last had filled it up too much. -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=190025#190025 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/sunset_at_kays_2008_06_26_141.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Sold my Kolb Firestar II- purchased a Aeronca Champ 7AC
From: "John H Murphy" <mailjohnmurphy(at)gmail.com>
Date: Jun 26, 2008
I just sold my FS II to a gentleman from New Mexico who could not pass his medical. I decided to purchase a 1946 Aeronca Champ. This is probably my last post before signing off on this list. I wanted to thank everyone who helped me with various problems on my Kolb. This is really a great resource. I also think often about our friend John Williamson who was such an inspiration to so many including myself. Thanks again for all your help! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=190027#190027 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tony Oldman" <aoldman(at)xtra.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Sold my Kolb Firestar II- purchased a Aeronca Champ 7AC
Date: Jun 27, 2008
You will like the Aeronca. I put about 60hrs in one before the MK111. Very nice to fly not a lot different than the Kolb. Floots a bit more when landing into good wind . Tony Do not arcive ----- Original Message ----- From: "John H Murphy" <mailjohnmurphy(at)gmail.com> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 3:36 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Sold my Kolb Firestar II- purchased a Aeronca Champ 7AC > > > I just sold my FS II to a gentleman from New Mexico who could not pass his > medical. I decided to purchase a 1946 Aeronca Champ. This is probably my > last post before signing off on this list. I wanted to thank everyone who > helped me with various problems on my Kolb. This is really a great > resource. I also think often about our friend John Williamson who was such > an inspiration to so many including myself. Thanks again for all your > help! > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=190027#190027 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "KOLB AIRCRAFT" <customersupport(at)tnkolbaircraft.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb Sales
Date: Jun 27, 2008
al, this is donnie at kolb aircraft, let me know what date you can be at kolb and i will have something set up for you, sorry i was not here at the time you called, e-mail me your plan to be here. thank you for your interest in kolb. donnie. ----- Original Message ----- From: "alking50" <alking737(at)yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:26 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Kolb Sales > > I recent retired (2nd time) and have been doing my research for a build and fly project. The Kolb MrkIII Extra is definitely a finalist. Since I live in Asia I have not had an opportunity to see and fly one. I called the factory to make an appointment to come there for a look and to test fly the Extra. Dennis told me it was doubtful if I could fly one because there is no qualified pilot around. I explained that I was going to travel 8000 miles to come see and make my final decision based on what I saw and how it flew. He just said I cant promise you any thing but I'll make a call or two. > > Just makes me wonder how they ever imagine selling an airplane with out a test flight. Did they ever make a call to their competition? They have a totally different attitude even offering transportation and lodging. Maybe he did not think I was serious but seems if a guy will travel that far he may be a little interested. Well I changed m plans and will go see another aircraft. I will be in Seattle area July 10 to 14 and would love to make contact with an owner around there. I would appreciate any help in that regard. I still like the airplane but... > > Al. King > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189887#189887 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "KOLB AIRCRAFT" <customersupport(at)tnkolbaircraft.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb Sales
Date: Jun 27, 2008
----- Original Message ----- From: "KOLB AIRCRAFT" <customersupport(at)tnkolbaircraft.com> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 8:13 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Kolb Sales > > al, this is donnie at kolb aircraft, let me know what date you can be at > kolb and i will have something set up for you, sorry i was not here at the > time you called, e-mail me your plan to be here. thank you for your > interest in kolb. donnie. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "alking50" <alking737(at)yahoo.com> > To: > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:26 AM > Subject: Kolb-List: Kolb Sales > > > > > > I recent retired (2nd time) and have been doing my research for a build > and fly project. The Kolb MrkIII Extra is definitely a finalist. Since I > live in Asia I have not had an opportunity to see and fly one. I called the > factory to make an appointment to come there for a look and to test fly the > Extra. Dennis told me it was doubtful if I could fly one because there is > no qualified pilot around. I explained that I was going to travel 8000 > miles to come see and make my final decision based on what I saw and how it > flew. He just said I cant promise you any thing but I'll make a call or > two. > > > > Just makes me wonder how they ever imagine selling an airplane with out a > test flight. Did they ever make a call to their competition? They have a > totally different attitude even offering transportation and lodging. Maybe > he did not think I was serious but seems if a guy will travel that far he > may be a little interested. Well I changed m plans and will go see another > aircraft. I will be in Seattle area July 10 to 14 and would love to make > contact with an owner around there. I would appreciate any help in that > regard. I still like the airplane but... > > > > Al. King > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=189887#189887 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2008
From: "Robert Laird" <rlaird(at)cavediver.com>
Subject: Re: Quiet Kolb
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:06 PM, cristalclear13 wrote: (who ever had the "brilliant" idea of building a prison right next to an airport I'll never know). Cristal -- In 2003, I flew into an airport at Newport, Arkansas. Apparently, it was at one time an Air Force base, so it was very large. Even the shortest of its three runways is long enough for me to takeoff and land on about three or four times. But the oddest feature is, on the approach to runway 04, there is a prison. I don't mean it's close by, I mean it's on the approach! I decided not to fly over it directly, but that means I'm approaching my touch-down spot at a 45-degree angle, so I had to make a fairly sharp turn to line up with the runway once I was clear of the prison. -- Robert http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&ie=UTF8&t=h&msa=0&msid=101773101841869726868.000450a5d63f109a051a0&ll=35.634279,-91.185665&spn=0.039205,0.063171&z=14 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Quiet Kolb
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 27, 2008
Theres a prison here in Santa Fe, about 4NM to the SE. In fact, it's a very commonly used waypoint for position reports to the tower. The worst part is it looks very much like the airport at night and many of the locals report approaching to land at the prison, mistaking it for the airport until the last minute. I never took the FS II over it and avoid it even in the titan. I wouldn't want to put down anywhere near it. As for a quiet Kolb, mine had the 3.47:1 C box cranking a 68" 3 blade warp drive. It was a fair bit quieter than my friend's FSII back in TX. He ran the 2.58:1 b box spinning a TPI woodie. I have used the Rotax aftermuffler and intake silencers. They do a surprisingly good job of hushing up the motor. I'd have loved to have tried them on my FSII. As for the 912, not much choice unless you can somehow fit a can muffler on top of the engine. Mine is louder than my 2-stroke ever was by far. The locals can hear me approaching the airport even while I'm still outside the class D...... LS -------- LS FS II Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=190082#190082 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2008
From: thewanderingwench(at)yahoo.com
Subject: Yahoo! Auto Response
I'm on an ultralight flight from Saturday, June 28 through Sunday, July 13. Since I'll be camping along the way, I won't have access to a computer...and only sporadic access to a phone So I'll get back to you on Monday, July 14. Arty ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2008
From: gary aman <gaman(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Quiet Kolb
Cristal, The evenings are nice but morning is my favorite. ----- Original Message ---- From: cristalclear13 <cristalclearwaters(at)juno.com> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:06:15 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Quiet Kolb I like my Kolb loud...let's me know she's running. It's when she gets quiet that gets me a little anxious. Haven't heard any noise complaints here (yet anyways). Guess the prisoners and guards right next to the airport have gotten used to it (who ever had the "brilliant" idea of building a prison right next to an airport I'll never know). Was a beautiful evening for flying. Got down just before sunset. Change of gear box oil seemed to do it some good. Whoever changed it last had filled it up too much. -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=190025#190025 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/sunset_at_kays_2008_06_26_141.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Aileron Spades, Lighten Stick Forces and Improve Roll Rates.
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 27, 2008
The strength of the ribs and the trailing edge of the wing is a valid concern and something I thought about. The most important thing here is that I don't use the spades to fly my Kolb around like I would a Decathlon. I still fly smoothly with normal roll rates, so the wing and its ribs are not being stressed any more than before I had the spades. I fly my Kolb like it was designed to fly, smoothly and well within its limits. The spades just make flying much more enjoyable as I have lighter forces on the stick when I fly in the way I always have flown my Kolb. I also have John H's wing strengthening angle iron inside the wing in addition to the ribs to make the wing much more rigid and less prone to twisting at the trailing edge. I did flight test my Kolb and took pictures of the wing with the ailerons at full deflection at higher speeds with the spades so that I could check for twisting, or any other type of deformation. The flight pictures gave me lots of time to check everything over very carefully on my large computer monitor, and it all looked great. I would not recommend anyone try to use spades to fly a Kolb like it was not designed to fly... It is really great to fly my Kolb with light aileron forces and also know that if I find myself getting banked excessively or close to the ground, that have very positive and quick control if I need it in an emergency. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=190138#190138 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Kolb Sales
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 27, 2008
If you find yourself in Miami, or if anyone else needs a some experience in a Kolb, I will be happy to take you for up in my MK III Xtra. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=190140#190140 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Yahoo! Auto Response
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 27, 2008
That sounds like fun !!! Anywhere to see your route, and the plane you are flying ? Good luck and fly safe. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=190152#190152 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Quiet Kolb
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)juno.com>
Date: Jun 27, 2008
rlaird wrote: > But the oddest feature is, on the > approach to runway 04, there is a prison. I don't mean it's close by, > I mean it's on the approach! I decided not to fly over it directly, > but that means I'm approaching my touch-down spot at a 45-degree > angle, so I had to make a fairly sharp turn to line up with the runway > once I was clear of the prison. > > -- Robert > > That's similar to ours. I almost have to fly over it on a left pattern to rwy 18. Link: -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=190153#190153 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Quiet Kolb
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)juno.com>
Date: Jun 27, 2008
gaman(at)att.net wrote: > Cristal, > The evenings are nice but morning is my favorite. > > --- That's a beautiful shot. -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=190154#190154 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2008
From: chris davis <capedavis(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Yahoo! Auto Response
June 28 through Sunday, July 13------------ -you lucky dog--- Chris=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: "thewa nderingwench(at)yahoo.com" =0ATo: kolb-list@matro nics.com=0ASent: Friday, June 27, 2008 2:23:59 PM=0ASubject: Kolb-List: Yah ahoo.com=0A=0AI'm on an ultralight flight from Saturday, June 28 through Su nday, July 13.- Since I'll be camping along the way, I won't have access to a computer...and only sporadic access to a phone- So I'll get back to ==============0A=0A=0A ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Mk 3 steel main gear legs
From: "Richard Pike" <richard(at)bcchapel.org>
Date: Jun 27, 2008
Denny, did you mean the ones I had for sale? If so, give me a call at 423-323-9441 or at richard(at)bcchapel.org Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=190189#190189 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: aviation pioneer
Date: Jun 28, 2008
Mr. Miller saw and did it all: <http://www.dmairfield.com/people/miller_jm/index.htm> Watch him in the Kellett in the vid clip. (BTW, welcome back Richard) BB ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2008
From: "Dan G." <azfirestar(at)cox.net>
Subject: Does anyone have video of John Williamson?
Hi All, I've been in touch with Beverly Williamson and the family would like to have some video of John that captures his voice. I took some of him flying but don't have any of him in person. If you have videos on VHS, DVD, or mini DV, I could combine them and write it to DVD for the family. Thanks, Dan Gilb 503 F2 Tucson, AZ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2008
From: "Dan G." <azfirestar(at)cox.net>
Subject: John W's Mounument Valley Trip Photos
Beverly Williamson has the memory sticks with the photos that John took during his MV trip. Their son put some of them on John's website - if you'd like to view them, click on the Scheduled Flights in 2008 <2008_Flights/Flights_in_2008_A.htm> link http://home.tx.rr.com/kolbrapilot/ I've offered to put the photos on CD for those who would like them. Please reply to me off list with your name and address and I'll start a list. I plan to mail them out in a few weeks if the list is not too long. Thanks, Dan Gilb 503 F2 Tucson, AZ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: crash
Date: Jun 29, 2008
Hi All, this time the crash is not mine. This morning I was working in my driveway when a neighbour put her head over the fence and said =ACOh, its not you then". She explained that she had been told that there had been a plane crash about a mile away last night and had assumed it was me. Why she should think that I have no idea. There are 3 landing strips within a couple of miles so I drove to the crash to check to see if it was local plane. .The police woudn`t let me poke around but it was obviously a Piper of some sort, probably an Archer, but identification was difficult as all that could be seen was about a foot of fin and about 6 inches of cabin top sticking up above the water in a small fishing hole. The story, as far as I can ascertain is that the guy lost his engine, tried to get down in a field and messed it up spectacularly. He arrived at the far hedge still going well, ploughed through it, removing his wings in the process. Ran down a bank and ended in the middle of the pond. Local fishermen tell me that it is only about four feet deep so he either had his wheels retracted or he wiped them off going through the hedge as the water nearly covered the cabin top The plane must have been pretty low and he picked his field in a hurry as there are several big fields within a few hundred yards of the one he chose. The pilot was not injured but the best bit was that the first person to arrive at the scene reported that the pilot was sitting on the cabin top, with his feet in the water wearing a tee shirt with a slogan written on it. The slogan was ` Trust me. I`m a pilot` Still laughing Pat. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "JR" <jrsmith2(at)triad.rr.com>
Subject: Re: John W's Mounument Valley Trip Photos
Date: Jun 29, 2008
Thank you Dan, I would like a CD when you finish them. Let me know what it cost. My address is: JR Smith 3007 Robin Hood Drive Greensboro, NC 27408 ----- Original Message ----- From: Dan G. To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 1:30 AM Subject: Kolb-List: John W's Mounument Valley Trip Photos Beverly Williamson has the memory sticks with the photos that John took during his MV trip. Their son put some of them on John's website - if you'd like to view them, click on the Scheduled Flights in 2008 link http://home.tx.rr.com/kolbrapilot/ I've offered to put the photos on CD for those who would like them. Please reply to me off list with your name and address and I'll start a list. I plan to mail them out in a few weeks if the list is not too long. Thanks, Dan Gilb 503 F2 Tucson, AZ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Checked by AVG. 6/19/2008 8:00 AM ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "thumb" <bill_joe(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: John W's Mounument Valley Trip Photos
Date: Jun 29, 2008
Dan you can add me to that list too. Bill Futrell 15052 Copeland Way Brooksville Fla 34604 ----- Original Message ----- From: JR To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 1:49 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: John W's Mounument Valley Trip Photos Thank you Dan, I would like a CD when you finish them. Let me know what it cost. My address is: JR Smith 3007 Robin Hood Drive Greensboro, NC 27408 ----- Original Message ----- From: Dan G. To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 1:30 AM Subject: Kolb-List: John W's Mounument Valley Trip Photos Beverly Williamson has the memory sticks with the photos that John took during his MV trip. Their son put some of them on John's website - if you'd like to view them, click on the Scheduled Flights in 2008 link http://home.tx.rr.com/kolbrapilot/ I've offered to put the photos on CD for those who would like them. Please reply to me off list with your name and address and I'll start a list. I plan to mail them out in a few weeks if the list is not too long. Thanks, Dan Gilb 503 F2 Tucson, AZ href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List">http://www.matronic s.com/Navigator?Kolb-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c ------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- 6/19/2008 8:00 AM ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <kcooper(at)ptd.net>
Subject: Missing Lord Mounts for 582
Date: Jun 30, 2008
All, Somehow during my 10 year build of my SS I have misplaced my 582 Engine Lord mounts. Probably mounted on my tractor somewhere. Does anyone have a part number? My prints and inventory show nothing. I want to make sure that I have the right parts. I'm finally getting ready to mount my engine and probably could of used some new ones anyway. I'm off camping for the next couple of days so sorry for the lack of a quick response. Appreciate the help, Dan Cooper SS SN 17 Wellsboro, PA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Missing Lord Mounts for 582
Date: Jun 30, 2008
Dan: I'd give Travis a call at TNK. He will fix you right up. john h mkIII Somehow during my 10 year build of my SS I have misplaced my 582 Engine Lord mounts. Dan Cooper SS SN 17 Wellsboro, PA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steven Green" <Kolbdriver(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Missing Lord Mounts for 582
Date: Jun 30, 2008
Dan, TNK keeps them in stock. There are three different mounts that are dimensionally identical with different hardnesses of rubber. Give Travis a call and He will have them in a box with your address on it before you get off the phone. Steven Green Mark III 912S 550 hrs ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WillUribe(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 01, 2008
Subject: Intercept flight over the firing range
Greetings, Dave R. took this picture yesterday from my FireStar. Regards, Will Uribe FireStar II El Paso, TX **************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Back home
Date: Jul 01, 2008
> Got back home in PA after a very good trip around the southern states. > > Terry - FireFly #95 Hi Terry: Was a very pleasant surprise to see you and your wife in my driveway. I thoroughly enjoyed your visit. You all are welcome back anytime. Next time, plan on staying longer. Glad you all had a good, safe trip. Take care, john h ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Back home
Date: Jul 01, 2008
> Glad you all had a good, safe trip. > > Take care, > > john h Kolb Gang: My appologies. Assumed the email I replied to was a bc from Terry. 20,000 xin loi (excuse me's in Vietnamese/GI slang), john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Michael Adams" <altojazz35(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: New video
Date: Jul 01, 2008
For those who like to watch videos of Kolb Firestars, I have a new video posted. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdW_CyLOz8Q or visit http://www.youtube.com/user/stlmusic to see more videos. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Travis Brown (Kolb Aircraft)" <travis(at)tnkolbaircraft.com>
Subject: Re: New video
Date: Jul 01, 2008
Thanks Michael for the great videos. Kind Regards Travis @ Kolb ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Adams To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 12:41 PM Subject: Kolb-List: New video For those who like to watch videos of Kolb Firestars, I have a new video posted. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdW_CyLOz8Q or visit http://www.youtube.com/user/stlmusic to see more videos. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Unbelievable Aviation Laws
Date: Jul 01, 2008
From: "Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL" <Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland.af.mil>
<< There was a serious proposal from the RFC that Stonehenge (all of 20ft high) be removed as a danger to flying. Cheers, Pat >> Hi, Pat - Glad to hear that we are not the only country with aviation-ignorant bureaucrats making the laws. Here in the USA, an opposite sort of situation occurred, although equally ridiculous. In Biloxi, Mississippi, a 20-story casino/hotel went up almost overnight, and in a spot that was DIRECTLY along the final approach path to the main runway for Keesler Air Force Base, and within a half mile. Local political greed being what it is, this was done without any communication or coordination with the US Air Force, who would have protested vehemently about the proximity of such a high-rise on short final to the runway. Following unsuccessful attempts to have the hotel moved, the Air Force finally gave up. Now, the official published procedure for landing at Keesler on that runway is to approach at an angle 20-degrees off runway centerline, then align with runway heading when you cross over the numbers. Although this would be easy in a Kolb (gotta keep this thread Kolb-related) or any other general aviation aircraft, it is an especially unsettling maneuver for the KC-135 tankers that primarily use that base. Dennis Kirby Mark-3, 912ul, in Cedar Crest, New Mexico ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Intercept flight over the firing range
From: "Dave Rains" <RangeFlyer72(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jul 01, 2008
It's just amazing how reliable Will's FireStar II is. I have been using this aircraft every year since 911, it's made every mission without fail. Thanks Homer Kolb. Dave "Skeeter" Rains -------- Dave Rains N8086T Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=190794#190794 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Nauga Field Fly Around - in 10 days!
From: "John Bickham" <gearbender(at)bellsouth.net>
Date: Jul 01, 2008
Well time is flying fast now. The second annual Nauga Field Fly Around will be held July 11, 12, & 13th. Location is south of St. Francisville, LA in the community of Starhill, LA. Nauga Field - LS35 1550 ft. runway with obstacles both ends. Folks planning to attend: John Hauck Mark IIIC Titus, AL James Tripp Firestar Millbrook, AL (next year Mark III) Steven Green Mark IIIC Etowah, TN Gary Haley Mark IIIC Houston, TX Jimmy Young Firestar Houston, TX (trailering) Ken Korenek Titan Dallas, TX (2005 Oshkosh Light Plane Grand Champion) A few locals. If I left anyone off the list, let me know so we can get the menus and groceries right. T-shirts are ordered. Hope the weather cooperates. For those that have never attended. Here are some rough videos. Sorry about the poor quality and shake. These are my first attempts and it was a bit thermally. I'm learning and experimenting. Will give you a rough idea of what to expect. For landing, the preferred RWY is 14 (to SE). Obstacles are further back and a makes is a little easier. Not enough difference to try to land downwind. The preferred RWY for takeoff is RWY 32 (to NW). Mostly because of available emergency landing options. Take off runway 32: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EMGPQEtvdY&feature=user Landing runway 14: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhX9-JMs7xA&feature=user You should be able to notice from the airspeed indicator that these are not maximum performance takeoff and landing (no braking!). Trying not to let out secrets so I can try to take the trophy away from John Hauck for the shortest landing last year. I'm pretty sure the lighter Firestar's will give him some stiff competition. Hope everyone can make it. Above all be safe. Should be able to put most folks up in bunks, spare rooms, etc. Don't need to pack a tent except for RON's to/from Nauga Field. The community of Starhill, my wife, and I are looking forward to the weekend. -------- Thanks too much, John Bickham Mark III-C w/ 912UL St. Francisville, LA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=190822#190822 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: New video
At 12:41 PM 7/1/2008, Michael Adams wrote: >For those who like to watch videos of Kolb Firestars, I have a new video >posted. > ><http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdW_CyLOz8Q>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdW_CyLOz8Q Nice. What kind of camera, and how did you mount it? I just posted a new one today, not flying but definitely Kolb related: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3ma4FioJno -Dana -- We are born naked, wet, and hungry. Then things get worse. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WillUribe(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 02, 2008
Subject: Coast Guard Intercept
Today Skeeter was intercepted by "Biel" Coast Guard. This while training the military to protect the nations capital. When intercepted, the light board on the helicopter flashed, "Hey Skeeter, I'd turn back if I were you!" Nice personal touch. Today the weather was better then yesterday because Dave didn't have to fly in the rain and around thunderstorms. **************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Unbelievable Aviation Laws
Date: Jul 02, 2008
<< There was a serious proposal from the RFC that Stonehenge (all of 20ft high) be removed as a danger to flying. Cheers, Pat >> Hi, Pat - Glad to hear that we are not the only country with aviation-ignorant bureaucrats making the laws.>> Hi, although bureaucrats are usually responsible for a SNAFU in this case it was the RFC, the Royal Flying Corps who made the request. The RFC`s No 1 Training Wing was close by and I suppose there were tyros struggling around the area at nought feet. Engines were notoriously unreliable and although the pilots must have found hitting a tree or a hedge an acceptable risk, smacking into a few tons of stone could make your eyes water. In general it was a great place for flying training. Miles of open rolling downland. There are still a few airfields in the area, and quite a lot of it is used for military training including air attacks.. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Update on my flying lessons.
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jul 02, 2008
I took my Sport Pilot Written test last Thursday and made a 93% on it. So thats out of the way! I didn't do as good as Crystal on her Private exam. [Wink] It looks like I have about 2 more lessons before the Check ride. I have to solo and then get 2 hours instruction with another SP instructor so he can sign me off to take the check ride with my instructor which also happens to be the examiner. I look forward to getting the SP license and bringing my plane home. I am tired of driving 4 hrs round trip to fly! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=190893#190893 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Update on my flying lessons.
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jul 02, 2008
Kolb mkIII in quitman,GA moving to Americus GA once my training is over. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=190918#190918 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Fatal Ultralight crash in North Georgia
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jul 02, 2008
http://www.gainesvilletimes.com/news/article/6799/ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=190970#190970 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Update on my flying lessons.
From: "Dwight" <haydend(at)charter.net>
Date: Jul 02, 2008
congrats Grant. You'll be flyin solo in no time Dwight Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=191011#191011 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Unbelievable Aviation Laws
Date: Jul 03, 2008
a drink at the Coronado Hotel in San Diego, where you can look DOWN on transport aircraft on final?>> Hi Russ, not the Coronado but last year we sat out on that spit of land the marines extended in the `40`s to protect San Diego Harbour and watched the planes disappearing among the buildings. Didn`t get the opportunity to get closer. Apart from flying in there from LA. It was the first stop on our tour which took us to Monument Valley Can`t remember the name of the place. Old age is a terrible thing. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Russ Kinne <russ(at)rkiphoto.com>
Subject: Re: Unbelievable Aviation Laws
Date: Jul 03, 2008
Old age may be terrible, but it's better than nothing! -- like "Halitosis is better than no breath at all," I once saw a needlepoint that said OLD AGE AIN'T FOR SISSIES Couldn't agree more. Best, Russ On Jul 3, 2008, at 7:38 AM, pj.ladd wrote: > a drink at the Coronado Hotel in San Diego, where you can look > DOWN on transport aircraft on final?>> > > Hi Russ, > not the Coronado but last year we sat out on that spit of land the > marines extended in the `40`s to protect San Diego Harbour and > watched the planes disappearing among the buildings. Didn`t get the > opportunity to get closer. Apart from flying in there from LA. It > was the first stop on our tour which took us to Monument Valley > Can`t remember the name of the place. Old age is a terrible thing. > > Cheers > > Pat > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Russ Kinne <russ(at)rkiphoto.com>
Subject: Re: Unbelievable Aviation Laws
Date: Jul 03, 2008
Sorry, List, that was meant to be off-list. My apologies do not srchive On Jul 3, 2008, at 8:59 AM, Russ Kinne wrote: > Old age may be terrible, but it's better than nothing! -- > like "Halitosis is better than no breath at all," > I once saw a needlepoint that said OLD AGE AIN'T FOR SISSIES > Couldn't agree more. > Best, Russ > > > On Jul 3, 2008, at 7:38 AM, pj.ladd wrote: > >> a drink at the Coronado Hotel in San Diego, where you can look >> DOWN on transport aircraft on final?>> >> >> Hi Russ, >> not the Coronado but last year we sat out on that spit of land the >> marines extended in the `40`s to protect San Diego Harbour and >> watched the planes disappearing among the buildings. Didn`t get >> the opportunity to get closer. Apart from flying in there from LA. >> It was the first stop on our tour which took us to Monument Valley >> Can`t remember the name of the place. Old age is a terrible thing. >> >> Cheers >> >> Pat >> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List >> href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com >> href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http:// >> www.matronics.com/contribution >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fatal Ultralight crash in North Georgia
Date: Jul 03, 2008
From: n27sb(at)aol.com
Because of the popularity of the ultralight hobby, crashes of this type of a irplane are not unusual in White County. O=99Brien said the last incid ent happened "a couple of years ago." The problem with such planes, he said, is that if something goes wrong, ther e are no safety features to protect the pilot. "It=99s like a hang glider with an engine," he said. Sounds like someone in the local area should have a talk with sheriff O'bria n and elevate his IQ steve -----Original Message----- From: grantr <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com> Sent: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 8:13 pm Subject: Kolb-List: Fatal Ultralight crash in North Georgia http://www.gainesvilletimes.com/news/article/6799/ ead this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=190970#190970 -= - The Kolb-List Email Forum - -= Use the Matronics List Features Navigator to browse -= the many List utilities such as List Un/Subscription, -= Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, -= Photoshare, and much much more: -= --> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List -======================== -= - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - -= Same great content also available via the Web Forums! -= --> http://forums.matronics.com -======================== -= - List Contribution Web Site - -= Thank you for your generous support! -= -Matt Dralle, List Admin. -= --> http://www.matronics.com/contribution -======================== ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Update on my flying lessons.
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)juno.com>
Date: Jul 03, 2008
Congratulations Grant! To celebrate getting our pilot certificates we'll have to have a South Georgia Kolb Fly-in! I'm in Waycross, you're in Americus, and someone else wrote me from Donalsonville (lost the email...who was that?). Any others? -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=191071#191071 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fatal Ultralight crash in North Georgia
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jul 03, 2008
Steve Boetto wrote: > > "Its like a hang glider with an engine," he said. > > That guy definitely needs to be educated on small experimental aircraft... They don't glide anywhere near as well as a hang glider ;) Not to mention the fact that I cant remember the last time I put my feet down and ran along the runway to land my Kolb ! Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=191076#191076 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 2008
From: TK <tkrolfe(at)toast.net>
Subject: Re: Unbelievable Aviation Laws
Russ Kinne wrote: > Sorry, List, that was meant to be off-list. My apologies > do not srchive > > > On Jul 3, 2008, at 8:59 AM, Russ Kinne wrote: > >> Old age may be terrible, but it's better than nothing! -- >> like "Halitosis is better than no breath at all," >> I once saw a needlepoint that said OLD AGE AIN'T FOR SISSIES >> Couldn't agree more. >> Best, Russ >> Russ, In the spirit of what John Hauck has asked in the past, how about identifying yourself by what you fly and how much experience you have. You have made over 70 postings to the Kolb List in the last two months with all kinds of sage observations and advice, but not stating from which you achieved this wisdom. I would be willing to learn!! This from someone who ignores a reasonable request to not impose themselves on the Homer Kolb family by staying overnight at our fly-in there! Terry - Firefly #95 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Fatal Ultralight crash in North Georgia
Date: Jul 04, 2008
That guy definitely needs to be educated on small experimental aircraft..> Some hope! This is newspaper reporter you are talking about. In general they are beyond educating.. A journalist is a man who would rather write a thousand words of imaginary description than check one fact. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Gyrocopter intercept
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)juno.com>
Date: Jul 05, 2008
I was intercepted today by AF gyro. :) just kidding Gyrocopter flew with me to Alma today on my first cross country in my Kolb Mark II Twinstar. -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=191314#191314 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/gyrocopter_formation_166.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "boyd" <by0ung(at)brigham.net>
Subject: density altitude
Date: Jul 05, 2008
Flying from Brigham City at over 4000 ft elevation and hot as blazes out side made me think of a formula to figure Density altitude easily. years ago I found an article that had a formula to help figure Density Altitude. " DA= E+(66*(T-(59-(E*0.0054))))" where: * = Multiply DA = Density Altitude E = elevation in feet T = Temp in deg F 0.0054 = laps rate per ft(or 5.4 Deg / 1000 ft) A faa article on DA stated 3.6 deg Per 1000 ft. instead of 5.4 DEG F / 1000 I guess I don't know why the difference in the 2 articles.. unless the laps rate changes with humidity levels. using 5.4 in place of 3.6 would allow for greater safety margins. anyway I did some math skills on the formula and came out with something that is not as plain to understand, maybe. but is a lot easier to accomplish with a very simple calculator. the results seem to be the same. DA= E*.0054 - 59 + T * 66 + E boyd young Boyd Young Kolb MkIII C 525+ hours and counting Brigham City Utah. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Fw: Bob Noyer - from his daughter Susan
Date: Jul 05, 2008
Farewell, Grey Baron! I was fortunate to have crossed paths with you. john h mkIII hauck's holler, alabama Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 1:39 PM Subject: Bob Noyer - from his daughter Susan > It is with great sorrow that I tell you that Bob passed away > yesterday, July 4th, at a hospital in Harrisonburg, Virginia. His > death was peaceful and without pain. > No viewing or funeral will be held. A memorial service may be held in > several weeks. > It was his wish that his ashes be flown over the Shenandoah Valley. > Condolences can be sent to: > Mrs. Robert O. Noyer (Jo) > 1316 Darlington Drive > Winchester, Va 22603 > > An obituary will be posted in the Winchester Star in the next several > days. > > If you wish to follow-up on this email please address a response to > me directly at: > snrosenbaum(at)earthlink.net > > Thank you, > Susan Rosenbaum, third daughter > writing from of the home computer of Bob Noyer > > The family would appreciate it if this emailed was forwarded to > anyone else you think might appreciate this information. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Gyrocopter intercept
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)juno.com>
Date: Jul 05, 2008
planecrazzzy wrote: > Just curious.... Could he "keep up" or did you have to back off the throttle? > . > . > . > Gotta Fly... > Mike & "Jaz" in MN > . > . > . Mike, My climb rate is MUCH faster, but as far as cruising he can keep up or even pass me. On the way there I was cruising at 65 but on the way back I cruised at 60 to save on gas. It is a RAF 2000 gyrocopter. -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=191327#191327 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 2008
From: "beauford T" <beauford173(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Fw: Bob Noyer - from his daughter Susan
..we all were, John... He was a class act ... beauford ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com> Farewell, Grey Baron! I was fortunate to have crossed paths with you. Subject: Bob Noyer - from his daughter Susan > writing from of the home computer of Bob Noyer > > The family would appreciate it if this emailed was forwarded to > anyone else you think might appreciate this information. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: Fw: Bob Noyer - from his daughter Susan
Date: Jul 05, 2008
He was a good, caring and thoughtful man. BB On 5, Jul 2008, at 2:47 PM, John Hauck wrote: > > Farewell, Grey Baron! > > I was fortunate to have crossed paths with you. > > john h > mkIII > hauck's holler, alabama > > > Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 1:39 PM > Subject: Bob Noyer - from his daughter Susan > > >> It is with great sorrow that I tell you that Bob passed away >> yesterday, July 4th, at a hospital in Harrisonburg, Virginia. His >> death was peaceful and without pain. >> No viewing or funeral will be held. A memorial service may be held >> in several weeks. >> It was his wish that his ashes be flown over the Shenandoah Valley. >> Condolences can be sent to: >> Mrs. Robert O. Noyer (Jo) >> 1316 Darlington Drive >> Winchester, Va 22603 >> An obituary will be posted in the Winchester Star in the next >> several days. >> If you wish to follow-up on this email please address a response >> to me directly at: >> snrosenbaum(at)earthlink.net >> Thank you, >> Susan Rosenbaum, third daughter >> writing from of the home computer of Bob Noyer >> The family would appreciate it if this emailed was forwarded to >> anyone else you think might appreciate this information. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 2008
From: "Robert Laird" <rlaird(at)cavediver.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: Bob Noyer - from his daughter Susan
I had the joy of exchanging several emails with Bob over the years and, with them, several stories of our respective aviation adventures. He was a gifted story-teller and I will miss hearing new stories. His body may be gone, but his spirit will be with us forever. -- Robert On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 4:07 PM, robert bean wrote: > > He was a good, caring and thoughtful man. > BB > > On 5, Jul 2008, at 2:47 PM, John Hauck wrote: > >> >> Farewell, Grey Baron! >> >> I was fortunate to have crossed paths with you. >> >> john h >> mkIII >> hauck's holler, alabama >> >> >> >> >> Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 1:39 PM >> Subject: Bob Noyer - from his daughter Susan >> >> >>> It is with great sorrow that I tell you that Bob passed away yesterday, >>> July 4th, at a hospital in Harrisonburg, Virginia. His death was peaceful >>> and without pain. >>> No viewing or funeral will be held. A memorial service may be held in >>> several weeks. >>> It was his wish that his ashes be flown over the Shenandoah Valley. >>> Condolences can be sent to: >>> Mrs. Robert O. Noyer (Jo) >>> 1316 Darlington Drive >>> Winchester, Va 22603 >>> An obituary will be posted in the Winchester Star in the next several >>> days. >>> If you wish to follow-up on this email please address a response to me >>> directly at: >>> snrosenbaum(at)earthlink.net >>> Thank you, >>> Susan Rosenbaum, third daughter >>> writing from of the home computer of Bob Noyer >>> The family would appreciate it if this emailed was forwarded to anyone >>> else you think might appreciate this information. >> >> >> >> >> > > -- Why did the chicken cross the Mobius strip? To get to the other, er, um.... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: gliderx5(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: Gyrocopter intercept
Date: Jul 05, 2008
I just flew my 503 powered MKII and I only cruise at about 45 mph on the GPS at 5200 rpm. At 6200 I can get 60 mph but no faster. Do these numbers sound like what others are seeing? I have a 3 blade IVO prop. Average fuel burn looks to be 3 gph. -- Malcolm Morrison http://home.comcast.net/~mmorrison123 Schleicher ASW-15 Pietenpol Air Camper Kolb MKII -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)juno.com> > > > planecrazzzy wrote: > > Just curious.... Could he "keep up" or did you have to back off the throttle? > > . > > . > > . > > Gotta Fly... > > Mike & "Jaz" in MN > > . > > . > > . > > > Mike, My climb rate is MUCH faster, but as far as cruising he can keep up or > even pass me. On the way there I was cruising at 65 but on the way back I > cruised at 60 to save on gas. > It is a RAF 2000 gyrocopter. > > -------- > Cristal Waters > Mark II Twinstar > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=191327#191327 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Gyrocopter intercept
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)juno.com>
Date: Jul 05, 2008
gliderx5 wrote: > I just flew my 503 powered MKII and I only cruise at about 45 mph on the GPS at 5200 rpm. At 6200 I can get 60 mph but no faster. Do these numbers sound like what others are seeing? I have a 3 blade IVO prop. Average fuel burn looks to be 3 gph. > > -- > Malcolm Morrison > http://home.comcast.net/~mmorrison123 > Schleicher ASW-15 > Pietenpol Air Camper > Kolb MKII > > Malcolm, On the way there my rpm was showing 6000 and I was cruising at 65mph on my ASI (and the GPS registered anywhere from 47 to 65). On the way back my rpm was around 5700-5800 and I was cruising at 60mph on my ASI. I have a 66inch wood prop. At the rate I was going I burned approximately 4 GPH. -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=191355#191355 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 2008
From: chris davis <capedavis(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: Bob Noyer - from his daughter Susan
He was a GOOD MAN and he managed to fly almost to the end , may he fly on w ith a fair wind and a smile on his face- . Chris=0A=0A=0A=0A----- Origina l Message ----=0AFrom: Robert Laird <rlaird(at)cavediver.com>=0ATo: kolb-list@ matronics.com; snrosenbaum(at)earthlink.net=0ASent: Saturday, July 5, 2008 5:4 0:12 PM=0ASubject: Re: Kolb-List: Fw: Bob Noyer - from his daughter Susan >=0A=0AI had the joy of exchanging several emails with Bob over the years =0Aand, with them, several stories of our respective aviation adventures. =0AHe was a gifted story-teller and I will miss hearing new stories.=0AHis body may be gone, but his spirit will be with us forever.=0A=0A- -- Rober t=0A=0A=0AOn Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 4:07 PM, robert bean =0A>=0A> He was a good, caring and thoughtful man.=0A> BB=0A>=0A> On 5, Jul 2008, at 2:47 PM, John Hauck wrote:=0A>=0A>> --> Kolb-List message posted by: "John Hauck" =0A>>=0A>> Farewell, Grey Bar on!=0A>>=0A>> I was fortunate to have crossed paths with you.=0A>>=0A>> joh n h=0A>> mkIII=0A>> hauck's holler, alabama=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>> Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 1:39 PM=0A>> Subject: Bob Noyer - from his daughter Susan=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>> It is with great sorrow that I tell you that Bob pas sed away- yesterday,=0A>>> July 4th, at a hospital in Harrisonburg, Virgi nia. His- death was peaceful=0A>>> and without pain.=0A>>> No viewing or funeral will be held. A memorial service may be held in=0A>>>- several we eks.=0A>>> It was his wish that his ashes be flown over the Shenandoah Vall ey.=0A>>> Condolences can be sent to:=0A>>> Mrs. Robert O. Noyer (Jo)=0A>>> 1316 Darlington Drive=0A>>> Winchester, Va 22603=0A>>> An obituary will be posted in the Winchester Star in the next several=0A>>>- days.=0A>>> If you wish to follow-up on this email please address a response to- me=0A>> > directly at:=0A>>> snrosenbaum(at)earthlink.net=0A>>> Thank you,=0A>>> Susan Rosenbaum, third daughter=0A>>> writing from of the home computer of Bob N oyer=0A>>> The family would appreciate it if this emailed was forwarded to - anyone=0A>>> else you think might appreciate this information.=0A>>=0A> >=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A=0A=0A=0A-- =0AWhy did the chick =======================0A=0A=0A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: gliderx5(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: Gyrocopter intercept
Date: Jul 05, 2008
Maybe I should try more prop pitch. My CHTs are 300 but my EGTs peak at 1200 (1100 at full power climb). I have home made streamlined struts, but no other "speed" mode. I don't have a VSI, but I will do some timed climbs to see what type of performance I'm getting. What are you seeing for climb rate? If I could get the cruise up to 55 that would be huge! -- Malcolm Morrison http://home.comcast.net/~mmorrison123 Schleicher ASW-15 Pietenpol Air Camper Kolb MKII -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)juno.com> > > > gliderx5 wrote: > > I just flew my 503 powered MKII and I only cruise at about 45 mph on the GPS > at 5200 rpm. At 6200 I can get 60 mph but no faster. Do these numbers sound > like what others are seeing? I have a 3 blade IVO prop. Average fuel burn > looks to be 3 gph. > > > > -- > > Malcolm Morrison > > http://home.comcast.net/~mmorrison123 > > Schleicher ASW-15 > > Pietenpol Air Camper > > Kolb MKII > > > > > > > Malcolm, On the way there my rpm was showing 6000 and I was cruising at 65mph on > my ASI (and the GPS registered anywhere from 47 to 65). > On the way back my rpm was around 5700-5800 and I was cruising at 60mph on my > ASI. I have a 66inch wood prop. At the rate I was going I burned approximately > 4 GPH. > > -------- > Cristal Waters > Mark II Twinstar > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=191355#191355 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Gyrocopter intercept
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jul 05, 2008
Try increasing your pitch, it does not take long, and you can always put it back if you dont like it. I decreased the pitch on my 912-s a couple weeks ago to get full RPM on takeoff and climb out.... It got me a couple more hundred FPM in climb, but cruise sucked, I had to run a bunch more power just to get the same cruise I did before. I put the pitch back for 5200 RPM on climb out, it restored my cruise speed with lower power settings. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=191370#191370 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 2008
From: gary aman <gaman(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Gyrocopter intercept
Might be helpful to know the top RPM on climb out. ----- Original Message ---- From: "gliderx5(at)comcast.net" <gliderx5(at)comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, July 5, 2008 7:48:08 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Gyrocopter intercept Maybe I should try more prop pitch. My CHTs are 300 but my EGTs peak at 1200 (1100 at full power climb). I have home made streamlined struts, but no other "speed" mode. I don't have a VSI, but I will do some timed climbs to see what type of performance I'm getting. What are you seeing for climb rate? If I could get the cruise up to 55 that would be huge! -- Malcolm Morrison http://home.comcast.net/~mmorrison123 Schleicher ASW-15 Pietenpol Air Camper Kolb MKII -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)juno.com> > > > gliderx5 wrote: > > I just flew my 503 powered MKII and I only cruise at about 45 mph on the GPS > at 5200 rpm. At 6200 I can get 60 mph but no faster. Do these numbers sound > like what others are seeing? I have a 3 blade IVO prop. Average fuel burn > looks to be 3 gph. > > > > -- > > Malcolm Morrison > > http://home.comcast.net/~mmorrison123 > > Schleicher ASW-15 > > Pietenpol Air Camper > > Kolb MKII > > > > > > > Malcolm, On the way there my rpm was showing 6000 and I was cruising at 65mph on > my ASI (and the GPS registered anywhere from 47 to 65). > On the way back my rpm was around 5700-5800 and I was cruising at 60mph on my > ASI. I have a 66inch wood prop. At the rate I was going I burned approximately > 4 GPH. > > -------- > Cristal Waters > Mark II Twinstar > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=191355#191355 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: gliderx5(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: Gyrocopter intercept
Date: Jul 06, 2008
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell(at)fmtcblue.com>
Subject: Re: Gyrocopter intercept
Date: Jul 05, 2008
----- Original Message ----- From: <gliderx5(at)comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 5:48 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Gyrocopter intercept > > Maybe I should try more prop pitch. My CHTs are 300 but my EGTs peak at > 1200 (1100 at full power climb). I have home made streamlined struts, but > no other "speed" mode. I don't have a VSI, but I will do some timed > climbs to see what type of performance I'm getting. What are you seeing > for climb rate? If I could get the cruise up to 55 that would be huge! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sounds as though you might be a bit lean on your midrange. You might try to raise your jet needle one notch. Larry C ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Battery Life
Date: Jul 06, 2008
trouble getting the engine started after the FireFly had set in the hangar for a couple of weeks. >> Hi Jack, you are OK with a mains supply to your trickle charger.. For those like me who hangar in afield with no such luxuries this may be interesting. I had a charging point installed in my Xtra and I have fixed a small solar panel on the roof of the hangar that provides power to an ordinary car plug. The sort that plugs into a cigar socket. Seems to work even here in rainy overcast England. The plug hangs from the hangar roof conveniently placed to plug in. I have in mind a system to lift the spare cable clear of the plane when I push her out, otherwise the cable might remove the VG`s from the top of the wing. Perish the thought. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Eugene Zimmerman <ez(at)embarqmail.com>
Subject: Re: Gyrocopter intercept
Date: Jul 06, 2008
Nope, don't mess with your carb till you get your prop set up correctly. Your top speed indicates that you do not have the optimum prop configuration. Unless your prop diameter is less than 66" diameter you will do significantly better with two blades than with three. What you need is more prop pitch. Gene On Jul 5, 2008, at 11:45 PM, Larry Cottrell wrote: > > > > > Sounds as though you might be a bit lean on your midrange. You might > try to raise your jet needle one notch. > Larry C > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 06, 2008
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: Battery Life
> >So Jack..... Why didn't you just pull the rope or Hand prop it for the one flight.....and git yer batt later..??? > > Gotta Fly... > Mike & "Jaz" in MN > >PS I was SHOCKED to hear you have Elec Start.... >That ALOT of weight... >. Mike, No rope to pull. I thought about tying it to the pickup truck and hand propping. But since I had never done it before, I thought it might be better if someone was around when I did it. So I passed it up for the day. One reason I can make the weight limit is that I don't have a manual rope pull start. The Victor 1+ does not come with one. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
From: gliderx5(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: Gyrocopter intercept
Date: Jul 07, 2008
Quick update I added a half turn more pitch to the 3 blade IVO and my 5200 RPM cruise went from 45 to 50 MPH. My top speed went from 60 to 65 MPH. Climb still good (not sure of the rate). EGTs quite a bit cooler, but engine running rough in the mid range. I think it's too rich now. I will try dropping the needle 1 notch later this week. -- Malcolm Morrison http://home.comcast.net/~mmorrison123 Schleicher ASW-15 Pietenpol Air Camper Kolb MKII -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Eugene Zimmerman <ez(at)embarqmail.com> > > Nope, don't mess with your carb till you get your prop set up > correctly. Your top speed indicates that you do not have the optimum > prop configuration. Unless your prop diameter is less than 66" > diameter you will do significantly better with two blades than with > three. What you need is more prop pitch. > > > Gene > > On Jul 5, 2008, at 11:45 PM, Larry Cottrell wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Sounds as though you might be a bit lean on your midrange. You might > > try to raise your jet needle one notch. > > Larry C > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell(at)fmtcblue.com>
Subject: Re: Gyrocopter intercept
Date: Jul 06, 2008
----- Original Message ----- From: <gliderx5(at)comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 6:50 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Gyrocopter intercept > > Quick update > > I added a half turn more pitch to the 3 blade IVO and my 5200 RPM cruise > went from 45 to 50 MPH. My top speed went from 60 to 65 MPH. Climb still > good (not sure of the rate). EGTs quite a bit cooler, but engine running > rough in the mid range. I think it's too rich now. I will try dropping > the needle 1 notch later this week. Who would have thunk it? :-) Seriously though, you can do a lot with fine tuning of your carbs with pitch, but a 100 degree difference between the midrange and high range is a bit much to accomplish. Keep in mind that the most dangerous to your engine is the midrange since that is the area where your attention is likely to be diverted to the ground coming up at you in landings. The easiest way to tell if you are too lean is to use your enrichner circuit when the temps go up. If the temp go down then you need to lower your clip to raise your needle, if it runs rougher then you are indeed too rich. You may have to do some adjusting with your main jets to get your high range where it needs to be. I personally prefer 1050 to 1100 for WOT, and the same for the midrange. Cht's should be in the 330 range. 6300 RPM's static. Your and others preference may be different. Like Beauford says- Worth what ye paid for it. Larry C ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Gyrocopter intercept
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jul 06, 2008
Does that RAF have a horizontal stabilizer on it? If it doesn't don't fly in it. That particular gyroplane has killed many high time pilots. Its unstable without the H stab on it. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=191530#191530 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: I soloed Saturday!
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jul 06, 2008
Saturday 7-5-08 I soloed my Kolb MarkIII! Prior to my flight we had strong gusty winds and T storms in the area will strong downdrafts and frequent lighting. We had decided to call it a day and head home but the wind died down to less than 3mph and the storms dissipated. My Instructor Danny Tyre and I decided to take a flight around the pattern to see how the wind was in the pattern. After determining it was good. We proceeded to make 3 landings and one emergency landing. After the last landing we headed back to the hanger and loaded my plane with some weight to get the cg in the safe range for my solo flight. Once we had the weight secured I strapped in ran down my check list and headed out to the runway. The Mk III flew much better losing 70 pounds of weight. I made 2 full stop takeoffs and landings. Both takeoffs and landings were on the asphalt and were both real nice and smooth. I am very excited about the Solo. Danny is an excellent instructor! On my solo it really felt like Danny was in the plane with me. Thats how comfortable I felt flying solo. Prior to getting in the plane for the solo I was feeling moderately nervous but not too bad. One I got in the plane I felt very confident. I have attached pictures Danny took of my solo. Danny takes very good pictures. Some of these are a tad dark due to the low light. http://www.flickr.com/photos/11569584@N03/sets/72157606020039760/detail/ Click the pictures to see a lager version. Grant Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=191532#191532 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tony Oldman" <aoldman(at)xtra.co.nz>
Subject: Re: I soloed Saturday!
Date: Jul 07, 2008
Congratulations .Nothing can replace that first flight by your self. Your instructor will always be on your shoulder. You picked a great machine to solo in. you did better than me. Istill prefer the grass to land on. I have never put weight in the Kolb when flying solo. I may be heavier than you. I am about 85Kg or about 190lb. Performance 1 up is great. Time in the seat is the best thing now . Keep it up. Tony Downunder MK111 400+ hours ----- Original Message ----- From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 3:45 PM Subject: Kolb-List: I soloed Saturday! > > Saturday 7-5-08 I soloed my Kolb MarkIII! Prior to my flight we had strong > gusty winds and T storms in the area will strong downdrafts and frequent > lighting. We had decided to call it a day and head home but the wind died > down to less than 3mph and the storms dissipated. My Instructor Danny Tyre > and I decided to take a flight around the pattern to see how the wind was


June 18, 2008 - July 07, 2008

Kolb-Archive.digest.vol-ho