Kolb-Archive.digest.vol-hs

September 09, 2008 - September 25, 2008



      
      
      I worked one up. maybe a bit overkill.:D 
      
                                                                  ADULT 
      Transportation Authorization, Liability Release and Indemnity Form 
      
      ADULT PASSENGER: __________________________________
      
      CHECKED PASSENGER ID: _____________DATE:______________ 
      (Please Print) (Pilot or EA Initials) 
      PILOT: __________________________________________________________ 
      AIRCRAFT (Type and N-Number):____________________________________________________
      N___________________ 
      DRIVER: ____________________________________VEHICLE (Type & License Number):_________________________________
      
      
      
      I understand that flying is a very dangerous activity and this aircraft  Kolb Mark
      III  N-1153 is an amateur  build experimental airplane that does not meet
      federal aviation safety standards. 
       I understand that the Owner of the Aircraft   Mr. Grant Richardson  is volunteering
      his services, time, skills, flight, aircraft, vehicles, and other related
      costs and expenses for the proposed flight. I, the undersigned Passenger and
      or any person or organization associated with me, in consideration of the furnishing
      of services, time, skills, flight, transportation, aircraft, vehicles,
      and other related costs and expenses being arranged and provided, hereby agree
      to forever release, discharge, and hold harmless  Mr. Grant Richardson, aircraft
      and vehicles owner(s) and/or lessor(s) (as applicable), each of their respective
      divisions, parents, family members, subsidiaries, member organizations,
      affiliates, chapters, officers, directors, agents, employees, volunteers, insurers,
      heirs, assigns, and successors in interest, and any and all entities who
      referred me to Mr. Grant Richardson, from any and all claims, demands, liability
      (under the law of any  county, municipality, state or country), fees, expenses,
      and costs of any kind whatsoever that I and or any person or organization
      associated with me may have or claim to have on account of or in any way related
      to or arising from, directly or indirectly, the proposed transportation
      and or flight, the cancellation or delay of the transportation, and/or the failure
      to provide return transportation. 
      My release specifically includes, but is not limited to, any and all alleged negligent
      acts, errors, and omissions of any of the released persons or entities.
      In addition to economic damages, costs, and expenses, this release also specifically
      covers any and all injuries, deaths, and conditions of health, whether
      or not immediately apparent following the flight, or which may at any time thereafter
      develop. 
      As evidenced by my signing this release, I and or any person or organization associated
      with me regard the services, time, skills, flight, aircraft, transportation,
      vehicles, and other related costs and expenses being furnished to me as
      significant, material, and valuable consideration in exchange for this release,
      and value this consideration as a significant, material factor in my well-being
      and physical prosperity. I have read and fully understand this document.
      I talked with  Mr. Grant Richardson about my questions concerning the proposed
      transportation and or flight. In connection with any portion of this document
      that I did not understand, I understand that I had and continue to have the
      right to obtain legal advice from an attorney of my choice. 
      This agreement shall be binding upon all the heirs at law, assigns, and successors
      in interest of all parties hereto. This agreement may be enforced by any party
      hereto and/or by any person or organization released in this agreement. I
      agree that this agreement shall be governed and interpreted by the laws of the
      state of Georgia. 
      
      PASSENGER SIGNATURE: 
      
      ______________________________________________________________ 
      
      DATE:_______________
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3391#203391
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: I am officially a sport pilot!
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 09, 2008
Cool! 8) Congratulations Grant! -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3398#203398 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: passengers/ law suits?
From: "Jim ODay" <jimoday(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 09, 2008
Thoughtful advice ---- "If I do take someone up, I make sure that I fly very carefully and safely, keeping in mind that stall speeds are up and the plane will be a lot heavier than I am used to. My best landings are reserved for passengers." ........ Well said Larry. -------- Jim O'Day Fargo, ND Former Firestar II Builder/Pilot Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3405#203405 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jerry Jones <maderah2(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: resonance 912
Date: Sep 09, 2008
Terry, ...to clarify on my earlier comment on wood props on pushers, lemme say although I'm not high on wood props on pushers, prolly not aluminum either, after what you said, I do have a wood Sensenich on my Jab-powered Skyranger, and in fact love their props. Wish I'd known about the tests you describe. I'd have felt more comfortable flying with one of their props after a loose bolt went through one on takeoff (A&P screwup--me) on my Titan. Didn't know it at the time, except the Titan went into a brief stall at its usual extreme takeoff angle (had a 3300 on it giving me incredible climb, even when well above Vy). Discovered the problem when I landed--prop was split lengthwise and a small chunk was missing. Wrapped the amazing invention, duct tape, on it and flew it home--praying all the way, of course. Couldn't save the prop. Fixed a lot of others though with baking soda and super glue after things went through them. Simple and easy fix. Jerry (aka Ricochet--story there too) Hangar 2 >> >> > Pat, > > Because that is the only kind of statement he seems capable of! > > During college I worked for Sensenich Aircraft Propeller Co. > building wood props. One of their tests was to put a propeller on > a test stand and the throw objects through the spinning propeller > to demonstrate, that even though chunks of wood would be torn off, > the prop was still able to provide thrust and give the pilot a > chance to land safely. You can imagine the excitement of that > demo!!!! Do that with an aluminum prop and it will immediately > fold back making flight impossible. There weren't any composite > props back then, but it would have been an interesting test also!! > Believe it or not, they would actually repair wood props that had > the ends sheared off. > > I have also seen what a piece of hard candy will do to a carbon > fiber prop when striking it. Causes major damage that is not easy > to repair, but repairable. Metal hardware would do more damage. > > Again, we have someone talking that doesn't know what he is talking > about!! > > Wood props are not fragile, do not have problems with moisture if > kept in good repair and the hub does not keep on compressing after > the first couple of times of torquing it up. I have 925 hr.s in > front of my Tennessee wood prop and get great performance from it. > Meets the published numbers for climb and cruise and I burn 2 > gallons per hour consistently. It survived a major strike from my > left wheel when my leg strut broke over a year ago upon landing. > The brake cable held on and swung the wheel assembly back up into > the prop. Sent the prop back to Tennessee Propeller and they > spliced and repaired the tips and did a great job. Been flying it > ever since with total confidence!! > > But, then what do I know compared to someone who knows it all, > > Terry - FireFly #95 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fusing the Ignition System
From: "Mnflyer" <gbsb2002(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Sep 09, 2008
Hi Steven, is right in that the HKS ignition is a CDI system that requires either battery of alternator power to operate same as an automobile system, if properly wired it is redundant in that it the engine will run on just the battery or the alternator. Whereas the 912 uses a magneto type (self generating) ignition and the 30 amp fuse / CB would be for the main alternator electrical system. -------- GB MNFlyer Flying a HKS Kitfox III Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3420#203420 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: resonance 912
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 09, 2008
tkrolfe(at)toast.net wrote: > > > Again, we have someone talking that doesn't know what he is talking about!! > > Wood props are not fragile, > > Terry, Despite all Terry wrote about working and having knowledge of all these propeller tests, Terry is JUST PLAIN WRONG. Wood props are very fragile, and are very likely to be broken by something coming off a pusher plane like a Kolb. This is a very well known fact. If anyone out there is starting to wonder after reading Terrys very misleading post, read this: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/418892/four_disadvantages_of_aircraft_propellers.html http://users.hunterlink.net.au/~dddj/Powershift.htm Terry claims that "Again, we have someone talking that doesn't know what he is talking about!! " Its pretty sad that a guy that likes to make this claim is the one that is posting bad information. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3422#203422 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Wood Props
Date: Sep 09, 2008
Lets ALL keep it nice. I would personally not have a wood prop on my MKIIIC. My experience has proven to me that composite props are much better on our airplanes. On my first plane I lost a wood prop in flight (it sheared the prop bolts and literally flew off) due to seasonal changes in temperature and humidity. I didn't know I needed to retorque the prop bolts at least twice a year because of the shrinking and swelling of a wood prop. This may not be necessary in all climates but it is in Michigan. I was also told that I should always leave wood props in a horizontal position so that oils in the wood would not migrate to one tip causing prop imbalance. I don't know for sure about this information but that is what I was told. My direct drive VW had a wood prop because wood props were the only props that didn't cause crank shaft problems. During taxi testing I got a bit too close to a tree and clipped a twig. I wasn't much over idle and the branch where I clipped it was only about a 1/8 inch dia. but the prop split from the tip almost to the hub. Since switching to a redrive VW and a PowerFin Prop I lost a 5/16 bolt X 3 inches long from a starter mount. The bolt went thru the prop at cruise RPMs. It got my attention and I subsequently landed to check things out. The prop was damaged but serviceable enough to fly almost 400 miles home. You do what you feel is best but I prefer a composite prop. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIC ----- Original Message ----- From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 2:23 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: resonance 912 > > > tkrolfe(at)toast.net wrote: >> >> >> Again, we have someone talking that doesn't know what he is talking >> about!! >> >> Wood props are not fragile, >> >> > > > Terry, ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: fuel line?
Date: Sep 09, 2008
From: "Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL" <Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland.af.mil>
<< The tygon and clear vinyl type fuel lines are substandard and cheap ... >> Grant - I'll second JetPilot's statement above, and will back it up with this short story: (OK - maybe a medium length story) (This all happened to me in the past month.) I installed new fuel tanks in my Mark-3 (2 x 6 gal) recently. They are the stock, top-feed type tanks, with the stainless 1/4" pipe dropping down into the tank. At the bottom end of the SS pipe is a 5-inch piece of flexible fuel hose, the other end of which is connected to the finger screen, which rests on the bottom of the tank. When installing these new tanks in June, I used Tygon for those two 5-inch pieces of flexible fuel line in each tank, for the finger screens. It was new, unused tubing that I happened to have in my aircraft supply bin, so I used it. It was in brand new condition - soft, flexible, very rubbery. Since there is zero stress on that little piece of fuel line sitting at the bottom of the tank, I figured it would be OK. I was wrong. (NOTE - the entire rest of my fuel system is plumbed using the black Neoprene automotive fuel line, as you've seen recommended already in this thread.) After only 3 months of sitting in gasoline, that piece of flex line lost its flexibility, and actually expanded a little bit. I discovered this last week when I went to start the engine, and I turned on the electric fuel pump (before starting the engine). I can always confirm that the EFP is pushing fuel uphill to the engine when I see the fuel bubbling though the clear glass fuel filter, located up at engine level. I saw no fuel flowing through the fuel filter, even though the EFP was on. (Here's a plug for being able to see your fuel somewhere in the fuel circuit, even if only at one point!) The tanks each still had a gallon of gas, so the pickup screens were well submerged in fuel. But the junction of the flex line and SS pipe was ABOVE the fuel level, and air was being sucked into the fuel line from the space between the inside of the flex line and the SS pickup pipe. I couldn't believe that Tygon would lose its flexibility so quickly from sitting in gas. Right away, I replaced the Tygon with the black Neoprene auto fuel line (I use Gates, heavy wall), and all is well again. Dennis Kirby Mark-3 Classic, N93DK ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "boyd" <by0ung(at)brigham.net>
Subject: fuel line?
Date: Sep 09, 2008
II want to replace my fuel lines. What is the best line to replace it with. >>>>>>>>>>>>> I went to the NAPA store and bought some black rubber fuel line,,, been on for about 5 years now.. the plastic line that came with the kit gave me problems after 6 months,,, the clamps that came with the kit left a very small area on the fuel line fittings that would not seal well.... while checking on some staining on 1 carb, I was doing some pressure test and found a very small leak coming from the connection... put in the black hose and never found any problem since. Boyd Young MkIIIC 500 + hours ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Eugene Zimmerman <ez(at)embarqmail.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb List re: resonance 912
Date: Sep 09, 2008
Bill, Interesting 3D message illusion. Took me awhile to "get" it though. Gene On Sep 8, 2008, at 9:51 AM, william sullivan wrote: > Ted- I have no experience, but I think somebody went through this > a few months ago. Do you have a spare prop you could switch out? > > Bill Sullivan > > > _- > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > ====================== > _- > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > ====================== > _- > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > ====================== > _- > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > = > 3D > ====================== > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 09, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Wood props, was: Re: wood resonance 912
At 02:23 PM 9/9/2008, JetPilot wrote: >Wood props are very fragile, and are very likely to be broken by something >coming off a pusher plane like a Kolb. This is a very well known fact. > >If anyone out there is starting to wonder after reading Terrys very >misleading post, read this: > >http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/418892/four_disadvantages_of_aircraft_propellers.html > >http://users.hunterlink.net.au/~dddj/Powershift.htm Mike, I don't agree. You can't make a blanket statement that "wood props are more fragile" or "composite props are better". Wood is more susceptible to some kinds of damage and less susceptible to other kinds. I have seen (especially in the PPG world) wood props in regular use with all kinds of damage, and they hold together. I know one pilot whose headphones went through the [wood] prop right on takeoff. He said it was vibrating so bad that he thought the engine mounts would snap, but he made it up and aro und for a safe landing. OTOH I have seen composite props come completely apart due to what seemed a very minor nick, or even no visible damage at all. Wood props are softer, so they're more likely to suffer abrasion damage (a major factor for seaplanes or airboats with water spray), but that very softness means that a nick is less likely to propagate into a major crack. Also not all composite props are the same. The Warp Drive props, as I understand, are solid, rather heavy, and durable. Powerfins, with their relatively thin skin and foam core, are much more easily damaged. I don't know much about the Ivos. Wood has some other advantages as well as disadvantages. A wood prop is easier to repair if it is damaged. It can get out of balance, especially if damaged or neglected (but not because it's stored vertical, that's an old wives tale). A composite or metal prop can be more efficient due to the thinner blades, but a wood prop is easier to modify or "tweak" if it's not quite right. And wood is less expensive (I hesitate to say "cheaper"). The websites you cited are both either misleading to this discussion or plain wrong. I agree that a composite prop is probably better for an airboat, but only due to the specifics of their application. OTOH, the associatedcontent site has mostly misleading statements: "If there is a small split on the propeller, it can easily travel up through the wood grain and get larger and cause the propeller to fail. You don't want this to happen in the air, so you need to make sure there are no cracks or splits before you takeoff." A small nick in an aluminum prop can also cause a crack to propagate, much more likely than a similar nick in a wood prop. "Propellers that are made from wood can warp over time. Changes in temperature and humidity can easily cause wood propellers to warp." I have never seen a wood prop warp, though I suppose it's possible if left out in the rain with badly worn finish. "Four stroke engines generally run smoother when used with heavier propellers. Unfortunately, most wood propellers are very lightweight. Therefore, they usually aren't suitable to use with four stroke engines." Tell that to the designers, builders, and owners of hundreds of thousands of 4-stroke powered aircraft with wood props. "The density of wood is not uniform. Therefore, two blades of a propeller that is made from wood may not balance with each other. This can be the cause even when the blades have identical shapes." That's not a problem so much as an issue that must be dealt with in manufacturing. Careful attention to wood selection, final shaping, and finishing means any new wood prop you buy from a reputable manufacturer will balance properly. -Dana -- People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's safer to pick on rich women than biker gangs. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 09, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
At 04:57 PM 9/9/2008, Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL wrote: >...When installing these new tanks in June, I used Tygon for those two >5-inch pieces of flexible fuel line in each tank... >...air was being sucked into the fuel line >from the space between the inside of the flex line and the SS pickup >pipe. I couldn't believe that Tygon would lose its flexibility so >quickly from sitting in gas. Dennis, since we've been discussing various types of tubing, what kind of Tygon was it? Their yellow "Fuel and Lubricant Tubing"? Or something else? -Dana -- People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's safer to pick on rich women than biker gangs. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 09, 2008
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb List re: resonance 912
Gene- I have no idea what you are talking about!- I can't make out anythi ng, and don't know whose computer puts the "3D" there. - ------------------------- ------------------ Bill --- On Tue, 9/9/08, Eugene Zimmerman wrote: From: Eugene Zimmerman <ez(at)embarqmail.com> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Kolb List re: resonance 912 Date: Tuesday, September 9, 2008, 9:32 PM Bill, -Interesting -3D -message illusion.- Took me awhile to "get" it though. Gene On Sep 8, 2008, at 9:51 AM, william sullivan wrote: - Ted- I have no experience, but- I think somebody went through this a few months ago.- Do you have a spare prop you could switch out? - ------------------------- --------------- Bill Sullivan - 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D href="3D"http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List"">http://www.matron ics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D href="3D"http://forums.matronics.com"">http://forums.matronics.com 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D href="3D"http://www.matronics.com/contribution"">http://www.matronics.com /contribution 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 09, 2008
From: TK <tkrolfe(at)toast.net>
Subject: Puzzled
Is it me or does anyone else find it strange that the most belligerent and rude person on this list hides behind a pseudonym for his identity. Is there a reason he doesn't want people to know who he is?!!! Most everyone else signs with their real name and is known to the group. While the rest of us might disagree we don't find it necessary to insult the other person by calling them stupid and other names when they don't agree. Of course, as long as some others on the list encourage his bad behavior, he will continue to feed on it. Maybe after he sells his plane, he will evaporate from here!!!! Terry - FireFly #95 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 09, 2008
From: "Charles Davis" <ceddavis(at)gmail.com>
Subject: LSA
I think I'm one of the 2 individuals Terry mentions...:) The key section from the relevant CFR George quoted is: > (a) Receive and log ground and flight training from an authorized instructor in a make and model of light-sport aircraft that is *within the same set of aircraft* as the make and model of aircraft you intend to operate; Here's an FAA link to the "Sets" http://www.faa.gov/licenses_certificates/airmen_certification/sport_pilot/media/aircraft_sets.pdf So, I have an AP-5, ASEL tricycle gear over 87kts (earned in an Evektor Sportstar). However, this would not allow me to fly my Firefly, which is AP-2, ASEL Tailwheel under 87kts. However, with a tail wheel endorsement Aeronca Champ, I can legally fly the Firefly. The problem I have is that the local FBO sold the Champ, and I'll need a bi-annual soon. Technically, you could take the flight test "ground observed" in a single place ELSA (I do not know of anyone who did). Does any one know if the flight portion of the bi-annual can be done in a single place? Chuck Davis Firefly N7057K From: TK <tkrolfe(at)toast.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: LSA George Alexander wrote: > > > tc1917(at)bellsouth.net wrote: > >> I may be wrong here, correct me please, but I was under the impression that >> an AP-1 rating was a lesser rating than AP-2. In other words, if you had an >> AP-2, you were qualified in tail dragger AND nose wheel. You were stepping >> up a notch. Same as if you are rated for over 87 knots, you were >> automatically qualified for the lesser of the ratings. Any other way of >> interpreting it would be ridiculous. >> > > > Ted: > > For Sport Pilot, no "ranking" of LSA sets. The practical test for Sport Pilot gets you a set endorsement for the aircraft used. Have to do additional work for the others you want/need. Differences in handling characteristics is the reason given for the additional requirement(s). > > >From the FARs....... > > Sec. 61.323 > > How do I obtain privileges to operate a make and model of light-sport aircraft in the same category and class within a different set of aircraft? > > If you hold a sport pilot certificate and seek to operate a make and model of light-sport aircraft in the same category and class but within a different set of aircraft as the make and model of aircraft for which you have received an endorsement, you must- > (a) Receive and log ground and flight training from an authorized instructor in a make and model of light-sport aircraft that is within the same set of aircraft as the make and model of aircraft you intend to operate; > (b) Receive a logbook endorsement from the authorized instructor who provided you with the aircraft specific training specified in paragraph (a) of this section certifying you are proficient to operate the specific make and model of light-sport aircraft. > > -------- > George Alexander > FS II R503 N709FS > http://gtalexander.home.att. > George, If I understand you correctly, if I were to get certified as a Sport Pilot in an Aeronca then I would only be allowed to fly that type of plane? What does that do to those that have transitioned from a GA licenses to Sport Pilot. Are they then restricted to only flying their current aircraft type? I know of two individuals that have transitioned to Sport Pilot and was wondering how it would affect them. I'm having second thoughts about Sport Pilot certification if that is the restriction. Terry - FireFly #95 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: russ kinne <russ(at)rkiphoto.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb List re: resonance 912
Date: Sep 09, 2008
Bill I had trouble too -- this is all I got: > > On Sep 8, 2008, at 9:51 AM, william sullivan wrote: > >> Ted- I have no experience, but I think somebody went through >> this a few months ago. Do you have a spare prop you could switch >> out? >> >> Bill Sullivan >> >> 3D======================= >> 3D===================== >> href="3D"http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List"">http:// >> www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List >> 3D======================= >> 3D===================== >> href="3D"http://forums.matronics.com"">http://forums.matronics.com >> 3D======================= >> 3D===================== >> href="3D"http://www.matronics.com/contribution"">http:// >> www.matronics.com/contribution >> 3D======================= >> 3D===================== >> > > > _- > ======================== > 3D=======================3 > D============ > _- > ======================== > 3D=======================3 > D============ > _- > ======================== > 3D=======================3 > D============ > _- > ======================== > 3D=======================3 > D============ > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Tygon F4040A FUEL LINE
From: "beauford" <beauford(at)tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sep 09, 2008
Brother Hague: Had an interesting experience with the blue Bing down here... In service, it became the Brown Bing... and in some instances, the Black Bing with a brown furry side dish after about 5 months on the job. The puzzling aspect of the situation was that the clear Tygon fuel line pieces installed in the same system for the same period of time yellowed a little, but remained clean and unaffected inside. They were still soft and flexible. The attached photo shows the strange deterioration of the blue line, along with samples of the new blue stuff from the same batch of the corrupted Bing line and another batch of blue line obtained from another source. I have no idea what caused this. I use only Amoco Premium gas and PZ air cooled oil. I changed out the lines with clear Tygon and have had no recurrence of this problem Worth what ye paid fer it... Non-Blue beauford FF-076 Brandon, FL Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3471#203471 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/blueline_617.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 09, 2008
From: "Robert Laird" <rlaird(at)cavediver.com>
Subject: Re: LSA
I can't quote verse and scripture, but I don't think it's allowed for the biannual. On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Charles Davis wrote: > The problem I have is that the local FBO sold the Champ, and I'll need a > bi-annual soon. Technically, you could take the flight test "ground > observed" in a single place ELSA (I do not know of anyone who did). Does > any one know if the flight portion of the bi-annual can be done in a single > place? > > Chuck Davis > Firefly N7057K > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Puzzled
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 09, 2008
tkrolfe(at)toast.net wrote: > Is it me or does anyone else find it strange that the most belligerent > and rude person on this list hides behind a pseudonym for his identity. > Is there a reason he doesn't want people to know who he is?!!! Most > everyone else signs with their real name and is known to the group. > While the rest of us might disagree we don't find it necessary to insult > the other person by calling them stupid and other names when they don't > agree. Of course, as long as some others on the list encourage his bad > behavior, he will continue to feed on it. > > Maybe after he sells his plane, he will evaporate from here!!!! > > Terry - FireFly #95 Terry, I always sign my posts, sometimes with my full name, sometimes with my first name. There has never been any hiding involved on my part, anyone that uses this list knows this. I do not appreciate you resorting to lies to mislead this group. The last time things got ugly on this list, you jumped in with both feet posting some of the most objectionable things this list has ever seen. Almost everyone on this list has been able to move on from past ugliness, and let bygones be bygones. Why do you feel the need to post very objectionable statements at every opportunity ? Go read what you just posted... Having posted what you just posted, your statements make you not only a liar, but a hypocrite. I am sure everyone on the list will be thrilled to see that you are doing your best to turn things ugly again. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3475#203475 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: LSA
From: "George Alexander" <gtalexander(at)att.net>
Date: Sep 09, 2008
cedavis wrote: > > > > The problem I have is that the local FBO sold the Champ, and I'll need a bi-annual soon. Technically, you could take the flight test "ground observed" in a single place ELSA (I do not know of anyone who did). Does any one know if the flight portion of the bi-annual can be done in a single place? > > Chuck Davis > Firefly N7057K > > > > Chuck: Don't think the flight instruction portion of the review is allowed in a single place. Beyond the single place issue, don't think it matters what a/c you use. As long as the instructor is willing..... Not even sure it has to be LSA. -------- George Alexander FS II R503 N709FS http://gtalexander.home.att.net Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3476#203476 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wood Props
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 09, 2008
Rick, I SAW the same experience with a wooden prop on a 447 on a trike that I fly. One day a nylon strap came down and bounced off the tip of the wooden prop... Not catch, but just bounce off the tip... I signaled the pilot to cut the engine so that we could secure the strap. When the engine stopped, the result of this very light strike was a large split from the tip to the hub. The nylon strap did not have a mark on it... The wooden prop was beyond repair, so we replaced it with a Powerfin. The Powerfin is quieter, smoother, and gives us better performance on the 447. Given what I have seen first hand, and many reports like Ricks of wooden props taking major damage due to the slightest nick, there is no way I would ever put a wooden prop on a pusher plane. The balance and hub torque problems just make a bad situation worse. Wooden props have been around since the very beginning of flight, for many years they were the only propeller option people had. There is a very good reason that wooden props are almost never used on certified aircraft anymore. The almost total and complete switch from wood to aluminum and composite propellers did not happen for no reason. From small Cessnas and Light Sport airplanes, to larger piston airplanes, almost no one is using wood anymore. Aside from the few Nostalgic and antique repleca airplanes, wooden props are a thing of the past. The vast majority of aircraft engineers and designers recognize that wood propellers are inferior, and would never consider using them on modern aircraft. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3477#203477 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Baker" <jlbaker(at)msbit.net>
Date: Sep 09, 2008
Subject: Re: fuel line?
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) X-SpamReason %%SpamReason%%: > When installing these new tanks in June, I used Tygon for those two > 5-inch pieces of flexible fuel line in each tank snip... > After only 3 months of sitting in gasoline, that piece of flex line lost > its flexibility, and actually expanded a little bit. Then, on the other side of the experience continuum.... I have fuel grade Tygon F-4040-A fuel and lubricant tubing at the bottom of my tanks, in a setup similar to yours, and they've been there for 13 years. Still like new with very minor swelling and no cracks, abrasions. There's a huge difference in Tygon formulations. Just happening to have some yellow tubing lying around doesn't ensure that it's the correct formulation. I'm sure that most folks are convinced that Tygon is the Devil's own spawn and I'd have to say that assumption would be correct...IF you haven't taken the time to research the issue. Jim Baker 580.788.2779 Elmore City, OK ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DAquaNut(at)aol.com
Date: Sep 09, 2008
Subject: Re: Tygon F4040A FUEL LINE
In a message dated 9/9/2008 6:41:49 A.M. Central Daylight Time, d-m-hague(at)comcast.net writes: I still prefer the blue Bing line. -Dana I just replaced my fuel line with blue tubing I got from LEAF. It has , B.A. I. on it Any idea what the B.A.I. stands for? I used this line for a year and a half and it still seemed strong and reasonably soft Ed D. **************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com. (http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 09, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Tygon F4040A FUEL LINE
At 09:03 PM 9/9/2008, beauford wrote: >Had an interesting experience with the blue Bing down here... In service, >it became the Brown Bing... and in some instances, the Black Bing with a >brown furry side dish after about 5 months on the job... Interesting. The blue line that was on my Ultrastar when I bought it looked like that, but I don't know how old it was. OTOH I have some blue line on one of my PPG's and several years later it looks and feels just like new. I wonder if it's not chemical, but UV damage that does the clear tubing in? -Dana -- When only cops have guns, it's called a police state. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Denny Rowe" <rowedenny(at)windstream.net>
Subject: Re: Puzzled
Date: Sep 09, 2008
Mike, Calling Terry a liar and a hypocrite is a perfect example of your ridiculously short fuse! His being put off by your consistantly rude and derogatory personal attacks is most likely the reason he did not pick up on your real name when you use it, he probably quits reading half way through most of your posts. Take your own advise and reread what you posted. Your rude comments in the past have really put a lot of us off. Denny Rowe, owner of both wood and composite propellers that likes em both. Also have destroyed both kinds (not on my Kolb) no fault of the props. > > Terry, > > I always sign my posts, sometimes with my full name, sometimes with my > first name. There has never been any hiding involved on my part, anyone > that uses this list knows this. I do not appreciate you resorting to lies > to mislead this group. > > The last time things got ugly on this list, you jumped in with both feet > posting some of the most objectionable things this list has ever seen. > Almost everyone on this list has been able to move on from past ugliness, > and let bygones be bygones. Why do you feel the need to post very > objectionable statements at every opportunity ? Go read what you just > posted... Having posted what you just posted, your statements make you not > only a liar, but a hypocrite. I am sure everyone on the list will be > thrilled to see that you are doing your best to turn things ugly again. > > Mike > > -------- > "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you > could have !!! > > Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Puzzled
From: "Richard Pike" <richard(at)bcchapel.org>
Date: Sep 09, 2008
Terry, it's like this: the only way you will ever get any relief from this problem of bad manners and rudeness is to give up on the list and find something else to do. Guess how I know this? Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3495#203495 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 09, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Tygon F4040A FUEL LINE
At 10:31 PM 9/9/2008, DAquaNut(at)aol.com wrote: > > I just replaced my fuel line with blue tubing I got from LEAF. It > has , B.A. I. on it Any idea what the B.A.I. stands for? I used this > line for a year and a half and it still seemed strong and reasonably soft > B.A.I. = Bing Agency International -Dana -- As I learn the innermost secrets of the people around me, they reward me in many ways to keep me quiet. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: resonance 912
From: "John Bickham" <gearbender(at)bellsouth.net>
Date: Sep 09, 2008
Ted, Sorry for late response. Using Internet at work. Still without power from Gustav (day 8). Do not know if this will be helpful. I had a drumming problem when I first built my Mark IIIC w/ 912. It was my one and only attempt at plane building. I opted for the full enclosure. Problem was that the cage was fabricated with a slight bow outward at the bulkhead at shoulder level. This resulted in a small gap (less than 1/8") between the fabric and a couple of the long tubes on the side of the cage. I couldn't see it with a string line. With some speed and a big prop, the drumming would start. On the rebuild/modification, I used John Williamson's method. Started with fabric on bottom and rolled over each tube and glued. Overlapped and taped a joint to start for the next section. I'm not a fabric stitcher. Made a big difference. Much quieter and a bit faster. Not sure how much the fabric drumming affected speed. My plane is faster after the rebuild and I'm leaning to that as a big contributor. That or I knocked it into trim with that high/hard landing. Long shot but may help. I remember looking at your plane's instrument panel but did not pay attention to the rear area. Do not know if this will apply. best wishes! -------- Thanks too much, John Bickham Mark III-C w/ 912UL St. Francisville, LA "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as slow as you could have !!! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3504#203504 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 09, 2008
From: TheWanderingWench <thewanderingwench(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: LSA
Chuck Davis wrote: > Technically, you could take the flight > test "ground > observed" in a single place ELSA (I do not know of > anyone who did). Does > any one know if the flight portion of the bi-annual can be > done in a single > place? > I took my practical flight test in my single seat ELSA Maxair Drifter, with the examiner observing from the ground. Now that my bi-annual is coming up, I have checked with EAA and the FAA and have been told that the bi-annual MUST be taken in a two-seater with the examiner...because the bi-annual is meant to be for instruction, not a test. If John W. were still with us, he could quote the regs. Arty Trost Maxair Drifter Sandy, Oregon ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Puzzled
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 09, 2008
Richard Pike wrote: > Terry, it's like this: the only way you will ever get any relief from this problem of bad manners and rudeness is to give up on the list and find something else to do. > > Guess how I know this? > > Richard Pike > MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Richard, The only way you will ever get relief from this problem is to not to try to start shit and rekindle bad feelings at every opportunity. If anyone should know this, it should be you... You are a pretty poor excuse for a preacher, you sure do not practice what the bible teaches when you support this kind of behavior by Terry. If you believe in God, one day you will have to answer to him for it. Lets see here, Terry starts this shit again with multiple personal attacks, and then you bad apples criticize me for responding. Its obvious that you don't give a damn about right and wrong. There is not a one of you that would sit back and take something like Terry posted. So if a few of you bad apples support this behavior by Terry, then don't complain when things get ugly. Don't post unwarranted personal attacks then cry like babies when things get ugly on the list. There are a lot of people on this list that see how you bad apples operate, you are only making yourselves look like the hypocrites you are. We have been down this road before. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3515#203515 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Puzzled
From: "John Bickham" <gearbender(at)bellsouth.net>
Date: Sep 10, 2008
> We have been down this road before. Your right and your always the one in the middle of the road! I try my best to stay our of this stuff (nice word version). Can't let you insult a good man like the Rev. I wish you much success in selling your plane as soon as possible. There is a silent majority that has chosen not to post to or participate in this list because of this kind of stuff, of which you are the common denominator. I've been told this over and over by many people. A lot of them have (or had) a lot more to contribute to the list than you and I. I do wish you the best. But I can't let you keep thinking most of us agree with you and your position. Fly more, type less. -------- Thanks too much, John Bickham Mark III-C w/ 912UL St. Francisville, LA "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as slow as you could have !!! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3518#203518 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Puzzled
From: "David Lucas" <d_a_lucas(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 10, 2008
Mike, If a poll were to be conducted amongst all members, on a voluntary basis, regarding the incredibly strong way you respond to issues which have offended many on the list, would you accept the result ? You may not set out to offend people in your own thinking, but, most surely, it is the result that I see. David Lucas Not a Kolb owner/flyer yet, just 62 years experience of life ! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3520#203520 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Puzzled
Date: Sep 10, 2008
If you believe in God, one day you will have to answer to him for it.>> Good grief! If you think God monitors this list, man, do you have problems Seems a little like overkill to start invoking the Diety when there is that little key marked `DELETE` sitting right there on the keyboard. Come off it Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: passengers/ law suits?
Date: Sep 10, 2008
I worked one up. maybe a bit overkill.:<< I know that you are a litigious lot over there but that `blood chit` is frightening. I just checked on of mine and it says "I the undersigned understand that the flight I am taking is not a commercial flight and that the pilot is absolved from any resposibilty or claim resulting in an accident. Signed and dated" As I said in my original post I don`t think one of these chits has ever been tested in court and it doesn`t pretend to be a legal document. We just don`t sue for a pastime over here, but unfortunately we are slowly moving in your direction. Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ted Cowan" <tc1917(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: resonance 912
Date: Sep 10, 2008
Firstly, let me say to these two guys (men?), both of you shut up, nobody wants to hear it. Take it to personal mail and not on the list. This is a great list for information and experiences, not for arguing. One mans idea is another mans folly. One size dont fit all. You have to pick and chose what you want to do and how to do it. This list and its wonderful participants only SUGGEST things based on their own experience. Nobody HAS to do anything. If you dont like the advice, dont take it!!! Saying nasty things to each other on this list is terrible. Shows your intelligence level. Thats it. Now, on to the resonance on my slingshot with a 912. Have tested out many of the theories mentioned so far by several great guys. One that I have not tested out so far is by John Hauck about putting my windows in. May not have time before homecoming to try it but hope I do. Lots of humidity out there now. Just about everything has been checked and double checked. I am going to pull the filters off my carbs and watch them while tied down under power enough to create the rum rum. Might be one of the slides are moving up and down slightly. Might be the boot leaking. Gotta check it out. Called Miss. Lite and talked to Ronny Smith and he says his experience has shown -- guess he knows of an instance -- that its the prop. Warp makes its own troubles. He suggested the pulses from the exhaust of the titan exhaust system hits the prop and causes the whop whop which is amplified by the warp drive prop. He suggested I go to a Kiev Prop, about the same length. States it is quiet and very efficient and less mass to spin. Has had very good luck with them and are very much quieter and more efficient. He stated it is NOT the gear box. I would have a lot of crap on the magnet in the gear box and a chatter if it was loose. Great, another thousand bucks! I just bought the spinner for my warp. I may have a whole warp system up for sale soon. havent enough time to get the prop and test it before the homecoming. That is no place to be testing something new on your plane. Just wanted to let you all know of the updates on the rum rum problem. I have what I would call a perfect aircraft (for myself) except for the rum rum. If I can get that fixed, almost no matter what it cost, I will be a very happy man. Thanks to all who have helped. Oh, yeah, Bean is the one who was strongest in the suggestion about the props. We might end up with a winner. Thanks Again, Ted Cowan, Alabama, Slingshot 912 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: LSA
Date: Sep 10, 2008
If John W. were still with us, he could quote the regs. > > Arty Trost Arty T: And you could get your BFR in his Kolbra,in the SE corner of Oregon. Another week until time for Kolb Homecoming. Hope the huricanes leave us alone long enough to fly up and back in peace... john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "KOLB AIRCRAFT" <customersupport(at)tnkolbaircraft.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb time needed W Tennessee.
Date: Sep 10, 2008
THUMPER, COME TO KOLB AIRCRAFT HOMECOMING SEPT. 19, 20, 21, AND WE CAN HELP YOU. THANKS DONNIE. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thumper" <dlong1957(at)yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 1:46 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Kolb time needed W Tennessee. > > Anyone within a half days drive of Memphis consider taking me up in a two seat Kolb? I am just about ready to fly my recently purchased Ultrastar and need re-familiarized with it. I will pay your fuel bill. I have been getting some time is a Cub but everything I have read and remember there are many differences I need briefed on. Just some landings and several hours should be enough. My time 20 years ago was in MXL 2's and MXL amounted to over 40 hours plus several hours in a Zenair Zipper (any of those still around?). Anyone will ing to help. > Thanks. > > -------- > Dennis Long > Oakland TN > Kolb Ultrastar Owner > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 0273#200273 > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/100_1356_812.jpg > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: resonance 912
Date: Sep 10, 2008
Ted C: Daryl, at Warp Drive, has always had a 100% satisfaction guarantee on his props. I'd call him and see if he will send you another Warp Drive to try. There may be some problem with your particular Warp Drive. More mysterious things have happened when it comes to home built airplanes. I never had a problem with prop blades and Titan exhaust noises, but the first thing I noticed when Erich Weaver showed up at MV with his new STE exhaust system. It made a terrible noise as the exhaust pulses intermittently smacked the advancing blade on the right silencer exhaust pulses. John W got an STE system and hit did the same thing. The system was designed for the Pulsar, a tractor aircraft. Not for pushers like our Kolbs. About the same time my Titan exhaust system had multiple tube failures over a very short period of time. I had to have something I could rely on. I got the STE knowing it had the exhaust pulse, prop blade smacking problem. Yes, it did the same thing. Sounded like it was coming apart. My idea was to weld some 45 degree elbows on the outlets, but could not find anyone to do it for me before time to depart on a long flight. Got another idea. Cut the tips off perpendicular to the ground with the aircraft sitting in the 3 point position. Cranked it up and the smack was gone. John W trimmed his similar to mine and that fixed his problem. If, by chance the Titan exhaust is creating your resonance problem, then it is easy to change the silencer outlets to point in any one of three different positions. Yours is the only problem I have heard of with a 912/Warp Drive/Sling Shot (or any model Kolb) resonance problem. Ronny Collins had the similar resonance problem with Sling Shot/582 caused by loose fabric on the top of the right wing. Two stroke turns opposite the four stroke, so the top of the right wing was getting drummed by the fabric. It had been rib stitched, stitches pulled loose, and Ronny's SS sounded like a twin engine airplane with the props out of synch. Popped the fabric back to the ribs and the resonance went away. I really don't think you have a prop problem, but a prop drumming problem associated with fabric and air flow. You can take 10 minutes, tape up the back windows, go fly, and see if that changes anything. Check to insure fabric is affixed tightly to all fuselage tubes and wing ribs and tubes. Something is causing this problem. Just gonna have to keep looking until you find and fix it. There are too many Kolbs with 912's, Warps, and Titan exhaust out there flying without resonance to blame it on an engine, prop, or airframe design problem. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
Date: Sep 10, 2008
To keep my tank pickups simple I have only straight dip tubes with no floppy devices at the bottom. I cut the ends at an angle. I think they end about 3/8" from the bottom. I have some unusable fuel but I wouldn't be trying to get that last few ounces anyway. BB On 9, Sep 2008, at 10:13 PM, Jim Baker wrote: > > X-SpamReason %%SpamReason%%: > >> When installing these new tanks in June, I used Tygon for those two >> 5-inch pieces of flexible fuel line in each tank > > snip... > >> After only 3 months of sitting in gasoline, that piece of flex >> line lost >> its flexibility, and actually expanded a little bit. > > Then, on the other side of the experience continuum.... > > I have fuel grade Tygon F-4040-A fuel and lubricant tubing at the > bottom of my tanks, in a setup similar to yours, and they've been > there for 13 years. Still like new with very minor swelling and no > cracks, abrasions. > > There's a huge difference in Tygon formulations. Just happening to > have some yellow tubing lying around doesn't ensure that it's the > correct formulation. I'm sure that most folks are convinced that > Tygon is the Devil's own spawn and I'd have to say that assumption > would be correct...IF you haven't taken the time to research the > issue. > > Jim Baker > 580.788.2779 > Elmore City, OK > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Puzzled
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 10, 2008
This entire thread has nothing to do with Kolbs or aviation. Terry authored this thread with lies, and with no other intention than to post a personal attack to stir up trouble and cause bad feelings. Those in the group that support this kind of behavior, shame on you. It shows what hypocrites and poor excuse of men you are. When Reverend Richard jumps into this post to support someone that wrote a post with no other intention than cause trouble and hate, it puts him right in the company of Reverend Wright, Extreme Islamics, and other " religious " men that support this kind of behavior. Richards supporting of discord and hate might not be on the same grand level as Richards contemporaries, but he is taken his stand. Lots of bad " Religious " men out there, Richard Pike has shown what kind of man he is. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3576#203576 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Not very Puzzled
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 10, 2008
Here we have two entire threads, started by others by myself, that have nothing to do with Kolbs, and were written with other intention than to post personal attacks, and cause trouble. If you don't like the tone of this list, and the way things are going, I suggest you talk with the people that started these threads. Lets see, you ignore the person that authored these threads, and then you complain about me for their content. This is shows the behavior a very poor group men bent on vindictiveness and intimidation of someone they don't like. Supporting this kind of behavior by your " little clique " and then complaining when I respond makes you nothing short of a hypocrite. There are a lot of lurkers out there on the list that have to be unhappy with those that have started this again and those that support it. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3578#203578 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
Date: Sep 10, 2008
> To keep my tank pickups simple I have only straight dip tubes with no > floppy devices at the bottom. > I cut the ends at an angle. I think they end about 3/8" from the bottom. > I have some unusable fuel > but I wouldn't be trying to get that last few ounces anyway. > BB Bob B: I have always pulled fuel from the bottom of tanks, US, FS, and mkIII. I don't want the engine to quit and still have a gallon of gas in the tanks to crash with. ;-) Never did like multiple tanks and dip tubes, but that is strictly personal. My engine driven pump does a good job of pulling fuel (flown at 14,500 feet MSL wide open throttle), although I help it along with a Facet electric pump on takeoff, landing, and during low level flight, which is most of the time. Would probably never get the standby pump turned on if I lost an engine due to fuel pump on takeoff, landing, or low level flying. I figure if I get myself into an impending crash I can turn off the master switch and alternator switch which will shut down the electrical system, and isolate it all the way back to the battery. However, don't think I have ever remembered to do this on any of my crashes to date. Hardly ever hear of a post crash fire in a Kolb, but there is always that one time. I don't want to be the victim. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "KOLB AIRCRAFT" <customersupport(at)tnkolbaircraft.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb time needed W Tennessee.
Date: Sep 10, 2008
----- Original Message ----- From: "KOLB AIRCRAFT" <customersupport(at)tnkolbaircraft.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 9:09 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Kolb time needed W Tennessee. > > THUMPER, COME TO KOLB AIRCRAFT HOMECOMING SEPT. 19, 20, 21, AND WE CAN HELP > YOU. THANKS DONNIE. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Thumper" <dlong1957(at)yahoo.com> > To: > Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 1:46 PM > Subject: Kolb-List: Kolb time needed W Tennessee. > > > > > > Anyone within a half days drive of Memphis consider taking me up in a two > seat Kolb? I am just about ready to fly my recently purchased Ultrastar and > need re-familiarized with it. I will pay your fuel bill. I have been > getting some time is a Cub but everything I have read and remember there are > many differences I need briefed on. Just some landings and several hours > should be enough. My time 20 years ago was in MXL 2's and MXL amounted to > over 40 hours plus several hours in a Zenair Zipper (any of those still > around?). Anyone will ing to help. > > Thanks. > > > > -------- > > Dennis Long > > Oakland TN > > Kolb Ultrastar Owner > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 0273#200273 > > > > > > > > > > Attachments: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/100_1356_812.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
Date: Sep 10, 2008
I admit to a less than perfect system. My tanks are 20 year old chem jugs from my old employer. Probably held coil cleaner or cooling tower additive. Most likely should get new ones :) If I were to install a metal tank it would drain from the bottom too. With a plastic one I prefer not to weaken the floor with a hole. I also have forgotten to shut power in emergency landings. Seem to get too busy looking for a good spot. Last time the pump was squirting fuel straight out of the line. May have cleaned the prop a little. The thought offered about the exhaust direction possibly creating a resonance will be considered. BB On 10, Sep 2008, at 10:09 AM, John Hauck wrote: > > > > To keep my tank pickups simple I have only straight dip tubes > with no >> floppy devices at the bottom. >> I cut the ends at an angle. I think they end about 3/8" from the >> bottom. I have some unusable fuel >> but I wouldn't be trying to get that last few ounces anyway. >> BB > > > Bob B: > > I have always pulled fuel from the bottom of tanks, US, FS, and > mkIII. I don't want the engine to quit and still have a gallon of > gas in the tanks to crash with. ;-) > > Never did like multiple tanks and dip tubes, but that is strictly > personal. > > My engine driven pump does a good job of pulling fuel (flown at > 14,500 feet MSL wide open throttle), although I help it along with > a Facet electric pump on takeoff, landing, and during low level > flight, which is most of the time. Would probably never get the > standby pump turned on if I lost an engine due to fuel pump on > takeoff, landing, or low level flying. > > I figure if I get myself into an impending crash I can turn off the > master switch and alternator switch which will shut down the > electrical system, and isolate it all the way back to the battery. > However, don't think I have ever remembered to do this on any of my > crashes to date. Hardly ever hear of a post crash fire in a Kolb, > but there is always that one time. I don't want to be the victim. > > john h > mkIII > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 10, 2008
From: "VICTOR PETERS" <vicsv(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: resonance 912
Hey John, Did you mean to say perpendicular or parallel to the ground concerning Titan exhaust. Mine, used, came perpendicular and I thought of cutting the tips because of prop noise. Vic MIII Exrra 912ul ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
Date: Sep 10, 2008
Bob B: I haven't used a plastic jug tank since 1990. Back then the wall thickness of the jugs seemed to be quite a bit thicker than the jugs that are being utilized today. Popular in the UL world was a push in "elbow" pulling fuel out the bottom of the tank. Used a large neoprene grommet. These worked well for me. Never experienced any problems with them. I am still scratching my head trying to figure why folks use plastic fuel lines, when "good ole" black neoprene is readily available, cheap, durable, and reliable. Only reason anyone has come up with is to see the bubbles in the line. I think one of our fuel experts on the Kolb List some time back offered that gasoline "gases". When placed in a vacuum, i.e., pulling fuel uphill, it pulls gas out of the fuel that looks just like air bubbles. Back in the good ole days when I was running UL fuel line like everyone else, my fuel lines were always pulling bubbles. Used to drive me crazy. Pulling air through the fuel system, yet no fuel was leaking out when the engine was shut down or running. Now...I don't see it and am not bothered with it. I have, during preflight inspections of my US and FS, pulled on a fuel or pulse line and have it fail. Never had that problem with black neoprene. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: resonance 912
Date: Sep 10, 2008
Vic: A Titan exhaust can be tried with the outlets pointed left, right, or strai ght up. I never had a noise problem with the Titan systems, only the STE. john h mkIII Hey John, Did you mean to say perpendicular or parallel to the ground concerning Ti tan exhaust. Mine, used, came perpendicular and I thought of cutting the tips because of prop noise. Vic MIII Exrra 912ul ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: The Suggested Jetpilot Poll
From: "Michael Sharp" <kolbdriver(at)mlsharp.com>
Date: Sep 10, 2008
Ok, lets have a poll. -------- The air up there in the clouds is very pure and fine...And why shouldn't it be?- --It is the same the angels breathe. Mark Twain, Roughing it' 1886 Mike Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3602#203602 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: fuel line?
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 10, 2008
If you run a fuel pump below the level of the fuel and pressure feed it up to the engine, you will not have bubbles to worry about. It is possible to have an engine failure from pulling fuel up to much of a distance, and it will most likely happen during full power = Takeoff. The powerful fuel pump does a pretty good job of pulling fuel uphill, but the gas can vapor lock under certain conditions which would lead to engine failure. It is good practice to run an electric pump on takeoff and landing to pressure feed your engine driven pump. We had someone post that so paranoid about fire, he says not to run an electric pump on takeoff which is wrong, he is more likely to induce an engine failure and crash by doing this. A fire after a crash can happen with or without an electric fuel pump running... It is foolish to be so paranoid about remote possibility of a fuel pump causing a fire, that you create a much greater hazard of an engine failure. The best way to avoid a fire is to keep your engine running on takeoff and avoid a crash altogether. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3604#203604 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: The Suggested Jetpilot Poll
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 10, 2008
Your poll is of poor taste, and is nothing more than a personal attack and an attempt to cause trouble and discord on this list. As a matter of fact, the last three threads have been nothing but objectionable attacks designed to cause trouble on the list. I see a lot of gang type mentality here, a few here are posting nothing but objectionable and personal attacks because they are emboldened by their friends. This is type of behavior usually practiced by uneducated kids on the street. That says a lot about the quality of the so called " Men " participating in this conduct. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3608#203608 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Poor posting etiquette
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 10, 2008
Look at who authored the three post that were of " Poor Etiquette ". Not one of them were started by me. Yes, they were of very poor etiquette, you should complain to the people that wrote them. -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3609#203609 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fusing the Ignition System
Date: Sep 10, 2008
From: "Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL" <Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland.af.mil>
<< Dennis and others, Don't confuse ignition system with electrical system. The Rotax 912 "ignition system" is for the most part independent of the "electrical system". Rotax does NOT recommend a fuse in the ignition system. They do recommend one in the electrical system. The fuse in the electrical system can blow and the engine will continue to run well. Steven Green >> Steven - Thanks for the clarification! That answers my question then, about why the 30-amp fuse (Rotax) versus the 3-amp fuse on the HKS ignition system. Dennis Kirby Mk-3C, Cedar Crest, NM ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: fuel line?
Date: Sep 10, 2008
From: "Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL" <Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland.af.mil>
<< Dennis, what kind of Tygon was it? Their yellow "Fuel and Lubricant Tubing"? Or something else? -Dana >> Dana - No, it was not the yellow-colored Tygon F4040 that Thom Riddle describes. Just some (mostly) clear "Tygon" that I ordered from Aircraft Spruce a few years ago - I don't recall the exact description, besides that it was advertised as fuel line. Dennis Kirby New Mexico ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "KOLB AIRCRAFT" <customersupport(at)tnkolbaircraft.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb time needed W Tennessee.
Date: Sep 10, 2008
----- Original Message ----- From: "KOLB AIRCRAFT" <customersupport(at)tnkolbaircraft.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 10:30 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Kolb time needed W Tennessee. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "KOLB AIRCRAFT" <customersupport(at)tnkolbaircraft.com> > To: > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 9:09 AM > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Kolb time needed W Tennessee. > > > > > > > THUMPER, COME TO KOLB AIRCRAFT HOMECOMING SEPT. 19, 20, 21, AND WE CAN > HELP > > YOU. THANKS DONNIE. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Thumper" <dlong1957(at)yahoo.com> > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 1:46 PM > > Subject: Kolb-List: Kolb time needed W Tennessee. > > > > > > > > > > Anyone within a half days drive of Memphis consider taking me up in a > two > > seat Kolb? I am just about ready to fly my recently purchased Ultrastar > and > > need re-familiarized with it. I will pay your fuel bill. I have been > > getting some time is a Cub but everything I have read and remember there > are > > many differences I need briefed on. Just some landings and several hours > > should be enough. My time 20 years ago was in MXL 2's and MXL amounted to > > over 40 hours plus several hours in a Zenair Zipper (any of those still > > around?). Anyone will ing to help. > > > Thanks. > > > > > > -------- > > > Dennis Long > > > Oakland TN > > > Kolb Ultrastar Owner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 0273#200273 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Attachments: > > > > > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/100_1356_812.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: LSA
From: "Thom Riddle" <riddletr(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 10, 2008
A key to understanding which airplanes/sets and in which airspace a Sport Pilot can legally fly in, is the required endorsements list, which is in the FAA Advisory Circular AC 61.65e which is found on-line in .pdf format at http://tinyurl.com/6ha28m . After downloading this file, go to the 25th page in this document where Appendix 1. begins. The second section (12-21) of this appendix lists the Endorsements a Student Pilot Seeking Sport Pilot Certificate must have for various privileges. The third section (22-29) lists the Endorsements a Sport Pilot must have to gain legal flying access to aircraft with Vh faster than 87knots, operations to/from towered controlled airports and in controlled airspace, etc. Notice that this appendix listing also references the specific FARs. This AC 61-65e plus the LSA SETS referenced before in this thread pretty much spells out the requirements, though there a few things that are still open to interpretation. For example: If a Sport Pilot is trained in and passes his check ride in an LSA with faster than 87knots Vh (i.e. gets the >87kts endorsement), can s/he fly a slower than 87knot aircraft of the same type? My interpretation, which agrees with the interpretation of the Designated Pilot Examiner (DPE) who gave me my CFI-SP check ride, is that the faster than 87knot endorsement qualifies a Sport Pilot to fly the slower ones of the same type but not vice versa. I hope this helps a bit. -------- Thom Riddle CFI-SP Power Plant Mechanic N221FA Allegro 2000 912UL N197BG FS1/447 -------------------- Scratch any cynic, he said, and youll find a disappointed idealist. George Carlin Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3642#203642 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Eugene Zimmerman <ez(at)embarqmail.com>
Subject: Re: Puzzled
Date: Sep 10, 2008
Hey Richard, Welcome back! "All that is needed for the forces of evil to succeed is for enough good men to remain silent. " Please do not do that again. :-) With you here again, there is still hope for a better Kolb list. Gene On Sep 9, 2008, at 11:08 PM, Richard Pike wrote: > > Terry, it's like this: the only way you will ever get any relief > from this problem of bad manners and rudeness is to give up on the > list and find something else to do. > > Guess how I know this? > > Richard Pike > MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3495#203495 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Puzzled
From: "Ralph B" <ul15rhb(at)juno.com>
Date: Sep 10, 2008
I've been on the Kolb list as long as it's been in existence. There is no reason to attack anyone or make remarks that hurt people. The purpose of the list is to promote the sport of building and flying Kolb ultralight and Light Sport Aircraft. I enjoy reading comments, but I sure don't like to read a lot of bickering and political agendas. Can't we all just get along? Ralph B -------- Ralph B Original Firestar 447 N91493 E-AB 21 years flying it Kolbra 912UL N20386 0 years flying it Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3657#203657 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <smlplanet(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: FlyChallenger: Re: Dead Stick Takeoff
Date: Sep 10, 2008
From: Lowflier Sent: 2008-09-10 13:24 Subject: Fw: FlyChallenger: Re: Dead Stick Takeoff --- On Wed, 9/10/08, Red Stokes wrote: From: Red Stokes <lava472003(at)yahoo.com> Subject: FlyChallenger: Re: Dead Stick Takeoff To: FlyChallenger(at)yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, September 10, 2008, 12:56 PM --- This is good. My buddy Raymond Hanover sent me the link last week. I don't think I would have the guts to try it. Red In FlyChallenger@ yahoogroups. com, "J.D. Stewart" wrote: > > I never even thought about something like this. Of course, it's impossible > here in flat Nebraska... > > http://www.wingscha nnel.com/ index.php? &video_id= 754 > > J.D. Stewart > UltraFun AirSports, LLC > www.ultrafunairspor ts.com > Titan Aircraft E-mail list > http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Titanaircr aft/ > Challenger E-mail list > http://challenger. inebraska. com > __._,_.___ Messages in this topic (3) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic Messages | Links | Members Make 10+% Return in Safe, Commercial Real Estate: http://titan912s.realestms.hop.clickbank.net Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe Recent Activity a.. 7New Members b.. 2New Links Visit Your Group Y! Sports for TV Game Day Companion Live fantasy league & game stats on TV. Yahoo! Finance It's Now Personal Guides, news, advice & more. Discover Tips on healthy living and healthy eating on Yahoo! Groups.. __,_._,___ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Puzzled
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Sep 10, 2008
Come on now! Was it necessary to start this thread? Was it necessary to respond to it? [Rolling Eyes] I have a solution for you guys. Ya'll need to fly more and spend less time sitting around being bored and getting on the list starting these unnecessary conflicts. I don't have a problem with anyone on the list. I feel all of you have valuable information to share. I am new to Light sport aircraft and I value the input from the list and I value differences in opinions between members. The best way to smooth over this Hatfield and McCoy situation is to start ignoring the things said that get to you. Now play nice! :D Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3661#203661 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 10, 2008
From: "Richard Girard" <aslsa.rng(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Here we go again
Ladies and Gentleman, May I offer a suggestion based on experience? There will always be someone on a forum who acts like the kid who drops his pants in the supermarket check out line to try and embarrass his mom into buying him the candy bar he's denied. Attention is what the kid wants and by acting like a little s*** he gets it. A good spanking would help, too, but that's not PC anymore. So my suggestion is just ignore those who have no manners and insult people, start the name calling, etc. Eventually, when they don't get the attention they want they will go away to find someplace else to bother people.It seems that what is called the tyranny of the question has become the tyranny of the email. Once posted it requires a response. Well it doesn't. Just as the rude question doesn't deserve a response, the rude email doesn't either. I have the advantage of using Gmail and it handles this quite nicely. When I open my inbox all the messages are listed by subject and sender. Next to each message is also a box. All I have to do is check the box and hit delete. Poof, they're gone. No one is offended and I don't have to subject myself to some rude jerk. I'm sure other email services offer options like this, but if yours doesn't please feel free to contact me off list and I'll be happy to send you an invitation to Gmail. Rick ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Puzzled
Date: Sep 10, 2008
Preacher and others: I find the best thing to do is ignore the bastards, both sides, and drive o n. They ain't gonna run me off with a key board and monitor. If they want to run me off, they'll have to do it in person. You know, eye ball to eyeball. The ones that woof the loudest on the Kolb List are usual ly the ones that are the meekest when you meet them in person. Now.......let's get back to building and flying Kolbs. Now is one of the b est times of the year to fly. The air will soon start cooling off and clea n up a bit. Autumn colors are right around the corner. The Kolb Homecomin g is next week. Get your sleeping bag and air mattress loaded in the Kolb and head for Labhart Field. This Kolb List is ok if you ain't got nuthin' else. But the real Kolb expe rience is to load up the airplane, or yourself, and head out to the next Ko lb Homecoming, MV, John Bickham's Nauga Flyin. Meet some of us old and you ng farts that fly these things. Share some experiences eyeball to eyeball. Get to "really" know each other. That, to me, is what it is all about. I have met some of the finest folks in the world through my Kolbs. They ar e, for the most part, life long friends. Friends I enjoy visiting with, wh ether it is airplane, dirt bike, ATV, 5th wheeling, or whatever. You guys need to knock this crap off. Try to say something "nice" to each other once in a while. Don't look for stuff to pick apart. And.........do n't be telling me what a dumb ass I am, or how stupid I am, for what I am d oing. I bet I have been doing it a hell of a lot longer than a lot of you all. ;-) For the most part, I usually tell folks what and how I do it. I leave it u p to you to decide what you want to do. What you do and how you do it is y our business. Take care, john h mkIII Terry, it's like this: the only way you will ever get any relief from thi s problem of bad manners and rudeness is to give up on the list and find so mething else to do. Guess how I know this? Richard Pike ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Flycrazy8(at)aol.com
Date: Sep 10, 2008
Subject: Re: Puzzled
I agree with jhauck...... and That's my final answer !! do not archive **************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com. (http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 10, 2008
From: possums <possums(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
A lot of the degradation of the "blue fuel line" has to do with the sun. If you'll notice - the bottom fuel line (maybe coming out of your tank) inside the fuselage, will last a lot longer than the fuel line going to your carbs that are exposed to direct sunlight all the time. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: LSA
From: "George Alexander" <gtalexander(at)att.net>
Date: Sep 10, 2008
Thom Riddle wrote: > > > > > This AC 61-65e plus the LSA SETS referenced before in this thread pretty much spells out the requirements, though there a few things that are still open to interpretation. For example: If a Sport Pilot is trained in and passes his check ride in an LSA with faster than 87knots Vh (i.e. gets the >87kts endorsement), can s/he fly a slower than 87knot aircraft of the same type? My interpretation, which agrees with the interpretation of the Designated Pilot Examiner (DPE) who gave me my CFI-SP check ride, is that the faster than 87knot endorsement qualifies a Sport Pilot to fly the slower ones of the same type but not vice versa. > > Thom: Can't say with absolute certainty, but I believe I remember right that this interpretation differs from what I was given by the DPE who gave me my SP check ride. Sec 61.323 (and 61.319) seem pretty clear that you need an endorsement for any set that you want to operate in, no matter what other(s) you may have. Could be wrong..... wouldn't be the first time. My $.02 -------- George Alexander FS II R503 N709FS http://gtalexander.home.att.net Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3718#203718 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Puzzled
From: "Richard Pike" <richard(at)bcchapel.org>
Date: Sep 10, 2008
What kind of man I am - Hmmm. All I did was check the list - like I do from time to time to see if there is anything "airplaney" on it that is interesting - and happened to read this thread. I don't know who's post I am supposed to be supporting, don't know any of the details, don't care. All I did was say what was true. It was true nine months ago, still true now. If bad manners and rudeness are intolerable, then the list isn't an option. Guess I made a good choice when I left. PS to Mike: What made you think I was talking about you? Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3729#203729 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 2008 Kolb Homecoming
From: "N111KX (Kip)" <n111kx(at)mindspring.com>
Date: Sep 10, 2008
Looks like I will miss the homecoming for the 8th straight year. It never works out as Sep 25th is my wife's birthday AND out anniversary. Now, being a week earlier, work will get me. Hope to see you all somewhere soon. Regards, Kip FS II PS...Is the Firestar really gone for good :( -------- Kip Firestar II, N111KX Waiex, N111YX Quickie 1, N111QX Atlanta Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3734#203734 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Puzzled
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 10, 2008
Mr Pike, I don't think anyone should leave the list, the advantages to being here outweigh whatever we might not like about it. I would encourage you decide to come back and be active here. Now that things have cooled down a little bit, here is what I had a problem with. Terry started this thread that had nothing to do with Kolbs, and was nothing more than a personal attack on myself. Your response was " Terry, it's like this: the only way you will ever get any relief from this problem of bad manners and rudeness is to give up on the list and find something else to do. " You chose to support terry and imply that he could get relief from this type of behavior when HE IS THE ONE THAT INITIATED THE BAD MANNERS AND RUDENESS. The more honest and appropriate advice would have been to tell him not to initiate this type of behavior if he did not like it. Your supporting Terrys abusive post and uncalled for behavior was wrong. As a preacher, you of all people should not be supporting the person that initiates this type of uncalled for and inappropriate behavior. Instead, you support the attacker... You as a preacher should know better than anyone the difference between right and wrong. Terrys starting this ugly mess again with this thread was wrong. You supporting him doing it was wrong. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3735#203735 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Puzzled
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 10, 2008
John H, With all due respect, I agree with you when you say Enough is Enough. I put all this behind me the last time around months ago. You know very well that I have kept my posts clean and non abusive recently. If you have a problem with what is going on the list, you need to be talking the individual that instigated this whole mess and wrote this abusive " Non Kolb " thread, not me. At last count, there are 4 separate threads that were started here on this list that are nothing but rude and nasty attacks, and have nothing to do with Kolbs, NONE of them were started by me. The majority of rude and inappropriate posts on this list written since yesterday were not written by myself. Double standards do not work, chastising me in public for responding to attacks while not saying a word about the instigators will NEVER achieve peace on this list. This continual mentality of everyone telling me to be quiet and take abuse form other members of this group only encourages repeats of what has been happening here in the past. If you want a clean list, then the same standards must be applied to everyone. It is very clear, that Terry, Michael Sharp, and others feel they have the blessing of the group anytime they want to write personal attacks. Given the response from this episode, it is clear they will surely feel they have the support to do this again and again. Want a clean list, its time to tell your friends to clean up their act, not just me. You know as well as anyone that double standards will never result in peace here. The SAME rules and standards of conduct must apply to everyone. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3747#203747 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DAquaNut(at)aol.com
Date: Sep 11, 2008
Subject: Re: : Kolb-List:Homecoming
In a message dated 9/10/2008 7:44:00 A.M. Central Daylight Time, jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com writes: Another week until time for Kolb Homecoming. Hope the huricanes leave us alone long enough to fly up and back in peace... john h mkIII I just got back from the hanger where I folded the firefly and secured her in the enclosed trailer which is inside the hanger! Hope she will be ok! Ike is supposed to be here by Fri. Hope I can get things to a point that I can make the Homecoming ! I ve got my tickets. Ed (in Houston) **************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com. (http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "KOLB AIRCRAFT" <customersupport(at)tnkolbaircraft.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb time needed W Tennessee.
Date: Sep 11, 2008
----- Original Message ----- From: "KOLB AIRCRAFT" <customersupport(at)tnkolbaircraft.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 1:31 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Kolb time needed W Tennessee. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "KOLB AIRCRAFT" <customersupport(at)tnkolbaircraft.com> > To: > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 10:30 AM > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Kolb time needed W Tennessee. > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "KOLB AIRCRAFT" <customersupport(at)tnkolbaircraft.com> > > To: > > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 9:09 AM > > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Kolb time needed W Tennessee. > > > > > > > > > > > > THUMPER, COME TO KOLB AIRCRAFT HOMECOMING SEPT. 19, 20, 21, AND WE CAN > > HELP > > > YOU. THANKS DONNIE. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Thumper" <dlong1957(at)yahoo.com> > > > To: > > > Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 1:46 PM > > > Subject: Kolb-List: Kolb time needed W Tennessee. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone within a half days drive of Memphis consider taking me up in a > > two > > > seat Kolb? I am just about ready to fly my recently purchased Ultrastar > > and > > > need re-familiarized with it. I will pay your fuel bill. I have been > > > getting some time is a Cub but everything I have read and remember there > > are > > > many differences I need briefed on. Just some landings and several > hours > > > should be enough. My time 20 years ago was in MXL 2's and MXL amounted > to > > > over 40 hours plus several hours in a Zenair Zipper (any of those still > > > around?). Anyone will ing to help. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > -------- > > > > Dennis Long > > > > Oakland TN > > > > Kolb Ultrastar Owner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 0273#200273 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Attachments: > > > > > > > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/100_1356_812.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2008
From: "Thomas R. Riddle" <riddletr(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: LSA
George, I agree with your reading of the quoted FARs... it is pretty clear. Perhaps what I should have said is that the way it will probably(my opinion) be enforced (if it can be policed at all) is the way that I described. In General Aviation (before Rec Pilot and now Sport Pilot) there has been a de facto "ranking", and that is the basis for my belief that this SP rule may be enforced (again, if it is possible to do so) with this ranking legacy and mentality. When I learned to fly a tail wheel airplane (PA-11), there was no such thing as a "tail wheel" endorsement. When I learned to fly a Mooney, there was no such thing as a "complex" endorsement, neither was their a "high performance" endorsement. These came about later and resulted in a de facto ranking system. Although the 61.300 series FARS that deal with Sport Pilots seems to eliminate that for this Airman Certificate, there is a move underway to "normalize" the Sport Pilot regs to be more like the pre-Sport Pilot airman regs. Time will tell if the regs actually change to reflect this. Thom in Buffalo ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Puzzled
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Sep 11, 2008
If you guys must bash each other, Why not keep it in personal messages or personal emails [Question] that way the whole list doesn't have to see this. This thread should have not been started here. This kind of stuff looks bad to new people lurking on the forum. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3781#203781 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: : Kolb-List:Homecoming
Date: Sep 11, 2008
Good luck, Ed: Hope you all all the other folks ride this one out with no problems. john h mkIII I just got back from the hanger where I folded the fir efly and secured her in the enclosed trailer which is inside the hanger! Hope she will be ok! Ike is supposed to be here by Fri. Hope I can get thi ngs to a point that I can make the Homecoming ! I ve got my tickets. Ed (in Houston) ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: fuel line?
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 11, 2008
John Hauck wrote: > Bob B: > > I am still scratching my head trying to figure why folks use plastic fuel > lines, when "good ole" black neoprene is readily available, cheap, durable, > and reliable. Only reason anyone has come up with is to see the bubbles in > the line. > mkIII The hazard with the fuel line from the auto parts store is that it's layered, usually with a webbing of some kind seperating the pleats. The idea here is it's designed for fuel systems that are under pressue, not under vacuum. The problem is that the pleats can seperate over time; the inner pleat can then collapse under vacuum with the expected results. This is a personal experience item, nothing I read off the Internet. The first time it happened to me was on one of my 503's (on my trike years ago, fortunately caught at a maintenance interval before it actually put me down in a field) was enough for me to make it the last time. I've used only the tygothane clear line from the usual a/c suppliers ever since. I'd love to run Aeroquip line as well, but I havn't researched how to deal with the fittings on my tank and on the Rotax fuel pumps for a good attachment. The tygothane lasts a long time and is a proven good solution on our light Rotax powered a/c. Works for me... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3797#203797 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: fuel line?
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 11, 2008
[quote="lucien"] John Hauck wrote: > Bob B: > > I am still scratching my head trying to figure why folks use plastic fuel > lines, when "good ole" black neoprene is readily available, cheap, durable, > and reliable. Only reason anyone has come up with is to see the bubbles in > the line. > mkIII Oops forgot my second point. The other HUGE advantage, the main advantage I'd say, of the clear line is the ability to inspect it. Being able to inspect critical systems is the life blood of flying those systems through the air. Opaque lines like the black neoprene lines cannot be inspected for problems without actually removing them and even then it's difficult to spot problems with the inner pleats in longer runs. So generally it just never is inspected except on the outside and it's quality has to be taken on faith. Not good...... The clear tygothane lines, on the other hand, can be easily and thoroughly inspected with it still on the plane and defects are easy to spot. Don't ask me why I know this... Having to change it out from time to time is, in my experience, a very small trade-off compared to the ability to inspect the lines conveniently and effectively. Well worth it... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3800#203800 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <smlplanet(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
Date: Sep 11, 2008
Some black fuel lines start breaking down when an oil mix is run thru them after awhile and you can find small black pieces in the filer. The best black fuel line would be a marine grade used for gas and oil mixes. -------------------------------------------------- From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com> Sent: 2008-09-11 09:49 Subject: Kolb-List: Re: fuel line? > > > John Hauck wrote: >> Bob B: >> >> I am still scratching my head trying to figure why folks use plastic fuel >> lines, when "good ole" black neoprene is readily available, cheap, >> durable, >> and reliable. Only reason anyone has come up with is to see the bubbles >> in >> the line. >> mkIII > > > The hazard with the fuel line from the auto parts store is that it's > layered, usually with a webbing of some kind seperating the pleats. The > idea here is it's designed for fuel systems that are under pressue, not > under vacuum. > > The problem is that the pleats can seperate over time; the inner pleat can > then collapse under vacuum with the expected results. > > This is a personal experience item, nothing I read off the Internet. The > first time it happened to me was on one of my 503's (on my trike years > ago, fortunately caught at a maintenance interval before it actually put > me down in a field) was enough for me to make it the last time. > > I've used only the tygothane clear line from the usual a/c suppliers ever > since. > > I'd love to run Aeroquip line as well, but I havn't researched how to deal > with the fittings on my tank and on the Rotax fuel pumps for a good > attachment. > > The tygothane lasts a long time and is a proven good solution on our light > Rotax powered a/c. Works for me... > > LS > > -------- > LS > Titan II SS > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3797#203797 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: I am officially a sport pilot!
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Sep 11, 2008
Thanks everyone! Here is a picture Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3805#203805 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: 2008 Kolb Homecoming
Date: Sep 11, 2008
Weather for London, KY, next Thu, Fri, and Sat, is forecast "sunny". Hope is stays that way. Looking forward to another great weekend and flyin. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wood props, was: Re: wood resonance 912
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 11, 2008
Dana wrote: > At 02:23 PM 9/9/2008, JetPilot wrote: > > > > Wood props are very fragile, and are very likely to be broken by something coming off a pusher plane like a Kolb. This is a very well known fact. > > > > If anyone out there is starting to wonder after reading Terrys very misleading post, read this: > > > > http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/418892/four_disadvantages_of_aircraft_propellers.html (http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/418892/four_disadvantages_of_aircraft_propellers.html) > > > > http://users.hunterlink.net.au/~dddj/Powershift.htm (http://users.hunterlink.net.au/~dddj/Powershift.htm) > > Mike, > > I don't agree. > > You can't make a blanket statement that "wood props are more fragile" or "composite props are better". Wood is more susceptible to some kinds of damage and less susceptible to other kinds. > I can't agree either. I've flown wood props on several of the planes I've owned and my experience has not been that they're overly fragile. Most woodies, probably all of them in fact, are made from laminated blocks. Laminating wood in this fashion is a time-honored/well-known way to create a very strong, warp-free material for making props. The loosening bolt thing I would consider to be a non-argument, as loose prop bolts easily corrected with a torque wrench are more properly considered owner/operator error and not the fault of the prop. Laminated woodies don't suffer from this problem to a huge degree anyway. Woodies also have the advantage of light weight, particularly as compared to metal props. This is important for us with our smaller motors that are more sensitive to moment-of-inertia affects. Easy repairability of the woody is time-honored and pretty well understoond also. The failure mode of a good woody is not generally a complete explosion. Highly laminated wood blocks don't generally fail that way, since the grains of the laminates don't all run in the same direction (to my knowledge). I've never been a strong advocate of putting objects through spinning props anyway, tho, so I'm not too overly concerned about this particular aspect of it ;). But in case it does happen without my consent, and it has with one or two of my woodies in the past, the woodies seem to be very durable to me. Would I run one on my 912s? In a heartbeat if there were one appropriate for my plane.... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3810#203810 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Here we go again
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 11, 2008
aslsa.rng(at)gmail.com wrote: > Ladies and Gentleman, May I offer a suggestion based on experience? > Remember folks: this is a mailing list. If you're thinking of it otherwise - as a community, or online Rotary Club - you need to get out more. You can save a lot of heartache by seeking socialization elsewhere and using these lists for what they are - mailing lists. Just a friendly suggestion ;). LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3813#203813 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: russ kinne <russ(at)rkiphoto.com>
Subject: Re: I am officially a sport pilot!
Date: Sep 11, 2008
WAY TO GO, GRANT!! CONGRATULATIONS On Sep 11, 2008, at 10:31 AM, grantr wrote: > > > Thanks everyone! > > Here is a picture > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3805#203805 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
At 09:49 AM 9/11/2008, lucien wrote: >The hazard with the fuel line from the auto parts store is that it's >layered, usually with a webbing of some kind seperating the pleats. The >idea here is it's designed for fuel systems that are under pressue, not >under vacuum... Not necessarily. Although most if not all newer cars have fuel injection and an electric pump located in or near the fuel tank pushing the fuel, there are lots of older cars out there using only an engine driven pump pulling the fuel from the tank. I've owned some old cars with rubber fuel line looking so crispy that you'd think a feather touch would make it disintegrate, but it held even while the metal lines rusted out. But I'll still use clear line on my various flying machines. -Dana -- Sometimes you're the windshield, sometimes you're the bug. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2008
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: List Etiquette (Everyone Must Read This)...
Okay, so this is out of control. I have gotten numerous complaints in recent days about the content on the Kolb-List. I'm not going to point any fingers or publicly spank anyone. I expect everyone to conduct themselves as adults on these forums and treat all other members with respect. Moreover, this is a List about KOLBS. It is not a list about pointing fingers or other such behavior. As most of you know, I prefer to run the List unmoderated and open as I think it generally allows people to freely and openly discuss their opinions. I do not like to step in with a heavy hand and dictate what should or shouldn't be discussed. That being said, the rules from paragraph one above are of paramount importance. READ THIS Starting with message, any posts that are not about Kolbs, or in anyway attack other members or are just generally offensive will subject the offending person an unceremonious 14-day block from posting. Period. No exceptions. The offender will not be directly notified of the block, their posts will simply be rejected. No need to respond to this message. Any further messages must be about Kolbs. Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Admin ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mike Welch <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Kolb MkIII building progress
Date: Sep 11, 2008
Hello to all those that give a hoot! My apologies if I haven't responded to anyone's emails=2C I'm still rough ing it and have to use the library computer=2C and still live in an RV trai ler while I build my 40 X 48 hangar (w/ living qrtrs). Then the house is n ext... After being able to work full time on my MkIII all last year=2C I miss wo rking on the Kolb...but the hangar is almost done=2C and soon=2C I'll be ba ck at it. I'll post a couple of pics of the hangar=2C to anyone who cares. I'm planning on making it to the Kolb Homecoming...hope=2C hope!! See ya there. Oh=2C BTW=2C I'm glad to hear from Rick and Rev Richard. Missed you'ze g uys!! Kolbs are cool! (Hope this is Kolb related enough :) ) Mike Welch MkIII CX _________________________________________________________________ See how Windows connects the people=2C information=2C and fun that are part of your life. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2008
From: mark rinehart <capt_riney(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Engine for Kolb MkIII
I'm looking for a used Rotax 912 (preferrably) or a 582 for my Mark III Classic. If you know of any good deals please let me know. I'll be at the Kolb Open House in September. Mark Rinehart ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Engine for Kolb MkIII
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 11, 2008
A friend of mine is selling a low time Rotax 582 that is currently flying on his plane, he is switching to a VW conversion. I dont know the price, but I will put him in contact with you if you like. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3911#203911 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 12, 2008
From: "trader(at)fotoubuff.com" <trader(at)fotobuff.com>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
Hi everyone I just wanted to post some \ info I know about fuel line. many years ago there was the blue fuel line which was suppose to be the best. and in many cases it was, until someone introduced some blue crap that looked and felt the same as the good stuff. I suggest throwing it all away. I made the mistake of putting some of the bad crap in my dip type fuel tank on trike. the hose broke off inside the tank It didnt take long to go bad. the yellow fuel line tubing is tygon 4040 and is NOT TYGOTHANE but can be used for fuel but NOT recommended. there are 2 types of fuel line I only use. EITHER base will not hold up and will be a mistake. this stuff can be colored if you buy a million or more feet. Probably no one will buy but generally the good stuff will be nearly clear I personally use Superthane ester. I have an account with new age Jackof mosttrades. . ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 12, 2008
From: "Richard Girard" <aslsa.rng(at)gmail.com>
Subject: LSA's and FAR 61.319
Following the various posts on LSA endorsements and reading 61.319, I was in the dark about the meaning of "sets of aircraft" so I called the FAA Light Sport Branch this morning for clarification. They explained it and referred me to: http://www.faa.gov/licenses_certificates/airmen_certification/sport_pilot/media/aircraft_sets.pdf So, here's the deal as explained by Tom, Rich and Joe (yes, it took all three to get the definitive answers). If your endorsement is for a tricycle gear aircraft whose maximum cruise speed is under 87 knots you are good to go in ALL tricycle gear LSA's, qualifying certified aircraft, or E-AB's (again provided they qualify to be flown by a sport pilot) that has a max cruise speed under 87 knots. This is a set of aircraft. Same goes for taildraggers. If you flew a Kolb with a max cruise speed under 87 knots to get your endorsement, you can fly a Firefly, Firestar, Mk III, whatever. It doesn't even have to be a Kolb, perish the thought. As long as it drags its tail and cruises at less than 87 knots you're legal. HOWEVER, a set of aircraft is a set of aircraft and they are NOT backward compatible. If your endorsement is for AP-5 (tricycle gear max cruise greater than 87 knots you are NOT good to go in AP-1 (tricycle gear max cruise less than 87 knots). The same goes AP-6 and AP-2. This applies to Light Sport certificate holders ONLY. If you're a PPL pilot exercising the light sport privilege you need a tail dragger endorsement (unless you are grandfathered in) to fly a tail dragger and that's it. BFR's. They can't be done in a single place aircraft and getting one in a different set of aircraft does NOT equal an endorsement. If you satisfied your instructor that you qualified for the endorsement he/she can give it, but it's not automatic just because your BFR requirement is met. Hope this helps, and thanks for the discussion, it gives me an article for next month's newsletter. Rick ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 12, 2008
From: "Richard Girard" <aslsa.rng(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
I don't want to be the spelling Nazi here, just want to clarify. Did you mean ether based tubing as not being good to use when you mentioned Tygothane C210 and Superthane as being ester based and good to use?Thanks for the clarification. Rick On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 9:16 AM, trader(at)fotoubuff.com wrote: > trader(at)fotobuff.com> > > Hi everyone I just wanted to post some \ info I know about fuel line. > many years ago there was the blue fuel line which was suppose to be the > best. > and in many cases it was, until someone introduced some blue crap that > looked and felt the same as the > good stuff. I suggest throwing it all away. I made the mistake of > putting some of the bad crap in my > dip type fuel tank on trike. the hose broke off inside the tank It didnt > take long to go bad. > > > the yellow fuel line tubing is tygon 4040 and is NOT TYGOTHANE but can > be used for fuel but NOT recommended. > > there are 2 types of fuel line I only use. > > EITHER base will not hold up and will be a mistake. > > this stuff can be colored if you buy a million or more feet. Probably no > one will buy > but generally the good stuff will be nearly clear > I personally use Superthane ester. I have an account with new age > > Jackof mosttrades. > . > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 12, 2008
From: "trader(at)fotoubuff.com" <trader(at)fotobuff.com>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
I purchase quantities from the company, New age and there is a difference in the formulation Both The makers of Tygothane and the makers of Superthane recommend: Either base is not as good. Jackofmosttrades RE I don't want to be the spelling Nazi here, just want to clarify. Did you mean ether based tubing as not being good to use when you mentioned Tygothane C210 and Superthane as being ester based and good to use?T Thanks for the clarification. Rick ________________________________________________________________________________
From: N27SB(at)aol.com
Date: Sep 12, 2008
Subject: Re: Wood props, was: Re: wood resonance 912
In a message dated 9/9/2008 5:38:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, d-m-hague(at)comcast.net writes: Wood props are very fragile, and are very likely to be broken by something coming off a pusher plane like a Kolb. This is a very well known fact. If anyone out there is starting to wonder after reading Terrys very misleading post, read this: Mike, I do not agree. I sat in front of a Sensenich 64 x 79 all wood blade for over a 1000 hours that was bolted to an 0-320 lyc. Even made trips to the Bahamas. That same blade took my good friend from Key West to Roatan and back. Non Stop both ways. Over the years I did have a few small screws from the cowl leave their mark but last time I checked it had over 2k hrs. I suggest that you learn how to keep stuff from falling off your plane and not rely on a blade not breaking no matter what it is made of. steve b **************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com. (http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: N27SB(at)aol.com
Date: Sep 12, 2008
Subject: Re: fuel line?
Lucien, If you follow this link you can see how I did it. I used Yamaha Outboard fuel line on the flex areas. I have used this type of line for years due to it's durability. If you opt to used the squeeze bulb, it is the best around. Part # 6Y1-24306-55. I have an old one that is ten years old and has always been used with oil mix. _http://www.sportpilot.org/magazine/feature/2008%20-%2007%20July%20-%20Buildin g%20a%20Grand%20Champion%20Ultralight.pdf_ (http://www.sportpilot.org/magazine/feature/2008%20-%2007%20July%20-%20Building%20a%20Grand%20Champion%20Ultralig ht.pdf) Steve B Firefly 007/Floats Firefly 0040/ Floats 2008 SnF Grand Champion In a message dated 9/11/2008 9:50:12 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com writes: --> Kolb-List message posted by: "lucien" John Hauck wrote: > Bob B: > > I am still scratching my head trying to figure why folks use plastic fuel > lines, when "good ole" black neoprene is readily available, cheap, durable, > and reliable. Only reason anyone has come up with is to see the bubbles in > the line. > mkIII The hazard with the fuel line from the auto parts store is that it's layered, usually with a webbing of some kind seperating the pleats. The idea here is it's designed for fuel systems that are under pressue, not under vacuum. The problem is that the pleats can seperate over time; the inner pleat can then collapse under vacuum with the expected results. This is a personal experience item, nothing I read off the Internet. The first time it happened to me was on one of my 503's (on my trike years ago, fortunately caught at a maintenance interval before it actually put me down in a field) was enough for me to make it the last time. I've used only the tygothane clear line from the usual a/c suppliers ever since. I'd love to run Aeroquip line as well, but I havn't researched how to deal with the fittings on my tank and on the Rotax fuel pumps for a good attachment. The tygothane lasts a long time and is a proven good solution on our light Rotax powered a/c. Works for me... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 3797#203797 **************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com. (http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014) ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: fuel line?
From: "Dave Bigelow" <up_country(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 13, 2008
> Jack, do you have a source for these two types of fuel line? Thanks. -------- Dave Bigelow Kamuela, Hawaii FS2, HKS 700E Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4055#204055 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 13, 2008
From: "Thomas R. Riddle" <riddletr(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
I copied the following from New Age's website. Note the bit about water and about modern fuel additives. I could find nothing about ethanol tolerance. Notes ^^Hydrolytic Stability -- For resistance to moisture and fungus, SUPERTHANE ether is recommended (Ester polyurethane does not react well with water, prolonged humid conditions, or attack from fungus.) The ether-based formulation is listed by the National Sanitation Foundation (NSF 61). It also resists attack from ultra-violet rays making it a good material for outside use. SUPERTHANE PU tubing is much more resistant to pressure and vacuum applications than corresponding sizes of PVC or rubber. ^Although polyurethane is commonly used in fuel applications, due to additives in today's gasoline and petroleum products, field testing should be performed. Thom in Buffalo ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Hurricane Ike/2008 Kolb Homecoming
Date: Sep 13, 2008
Hope all our Kolb folks in the area of Ike are ok. As of this morning, I have not heard from any of my Kolb friends from that area. Weather at hauck's holler is beautiful. Based on it, one would never suspect what is happening on the Gulf coast. Don't know how this storm will affect weather between Thursday and Sunday. Hopefully, we will be blessed with good flying weather and have a successful Kolb Homecoming. Whether you fly, drive, or walk, everyone make an extra effort to attend. The folks at TNK go to great length to make all of us Kolbers feel at home, comfortable, and well fed. The 2001 Kolb Homecoming was canceled. However, some of us felt so strongly about attending we decided to fly to TNK anyway. I can not remember who showed up for that Homecoming. We had a good time despite the troubled times. Take care, john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 13, 2008
From: "Robert Laird" <rlaird(at)cavediver.com>
Subject: Re: Hurricane Ike/2008 Kolb Homecoming
The eye of Ike passed about 45 miles to my east... winds are in the 75mph range, and there's lots of hard rain, lots of debris flying through the air... power is out in my area, and reports say 2 million people in the Houston/Galveston area are without power. So far, though, no major issues. -- Robert On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 8:07 AM, John Hauck wrote: > > Hope all our Kolb folks in the area of Ike are ok. > > As of this morning, I have not heard from any of my Kolb friends from that > area. > > Weather at hauck's holler is beautiful. Based on it, one would never > suspect what is happening on the Gulf coast. > > Don't know how this storm will affect weather between Thursday and Sunday. > Hopefully, we will be blessed with good flying weather and have a successful > Kolb Homecoming. > > Whether you fly, drive, or walk, everyone make an extra effort to attend. > The folks at TNK go to great length to make all of us Kolbers feel at home, > comfortable, and well fed. > > The 2001 Kolb Homecoming was canceled. However, some of us felt so > strongly about attending we decided to fly to TNK anyway. I can not > remember who showed up for that Homecoming. We had a good time despite the > troubled times. > > Take care, > > john h > mkIII > > -- Jack Benny - "I don't deserve this award, but I have arthritis and I don't deserve that either." ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HShack(at)aol.com
Date: Sep 13, 2008
Subject: Re: Hurricane Ike/2008 Kolb Homecoming
Price of gas was up over $1.00 a gallon last night; wonder how long that will last.............? Howard Shackleford FS II SC In a message dated 9/13/2008 9:27:24 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, rlaird(at)cavediver.com writes: The eye of Ike passed about 45 miles to my east... winds are in the 75mph range, and there's lots of hard rain, lots of debris flying through the air... -- (http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List) (http://www.matronics.com/contribution) **************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com. (http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Hurricane Ike/2008 Kolb Homecoming
Date: Sep 13, 2008
Robert: Glad you are ok. Still waiting to hear from Gary Haley NW of Houston. We got some more Kolb folks down that way also. john h - Blue bird perfect day at hauck's holler, alabama. mkIII So far, though, no major issues. -- Robert ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 13, 2008
From: "Robert Laird" <rlaird(at)cavediver.com>
Subject: Re: Hurricane Ike/2008 Kolb Homecoming
Gary lives about 15 miles due east of me which would, of course, put him 30 miles from path of the eye. Not too many trees in his aviation subdivision, so he's probably okay, but I'd bet his power is out.... almost everyone in Houston has no power. -- R On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 10:23 AM, John Hauck wrote: > Robert: > > Glad you are ok. > > Still waiting to hear from Gary Haley NW of Houston. > > We got some more Kolb folks down that way also. > > john h - Blue bird perfect day at hauck's holler, alabama. > mkIII > > > So far, though, no major issues. > > -- Robert > > > * > > > * > > -- David Lee Roth - "I used to jog but the ice cubes kept falling out of my glass." ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Hurricane Ike/2008 Kolb Homecoming
From: "George Alexander" <gtalexander(at)att.net>
Date: Sep 13, 2008
John Hauck wrote: > > We got some more Kolb folks down that way also. > > Anyone hear from Jimmy Young yet? -------- George Alexander FS II R503 N709FS http://gtalexander.home.att.net Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4096#204096 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: fuel line?
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 13, 2008
Steve Boetto wrote: > Lucien, If you follow this link you can see how I did it. I used Yamaha Outboard fuel line on the flex areas. I have used this type of line for years due to it's durability. If you opt to used the squeeze bulb, it is the best around. Part # 6Y1-24306-55. I have an old one that is ten years old and has always been used with oil mix. > http://www.sportpilot.org/magazine/feature/2008%20-%2007%20July%20-%20Building%20a%20Grand%20Champion%20Ultralight.pdf (http://www.sportpilot.org/magazine/feature/2008%20-%2007%20July%20-%20Building%20a%20Grand%20Champion%20Ultralight.pdf) > > Steve B > Firefly 007/Floats > Firefly 0040/ Floats 2008 SnF Grand Champion > Now that's a super nice fuel system setup there....... Personally, like I said I like to be able to inspect fuel line, at least any that isn't something I know has a very low chance of deteriorating like aluminum lines connected by AN fittings... So my personal preference is clear line. Now that said, I wouldn't worry about something like aeroquip line which even tho it's opaque, it's also not the rank stuff from the auto parts place either ;). Last line change on my plane I was trying to figure out how to go aeroquip, but I couldn't figure out how to get AN fittings on the fuel pump, carburettor and tank outlets. At least not without major mods and without just clamping the hose on there which would have been a little lame..... I had also tried to work up a metal line up to where it needed to flex at the engine, but couldn't come up with a good solution..... Yours is really nice tho... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4100#204100 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 13, 2008
From: "Robert Laird" <rlaird(at)cavediver.com>
Subject: Re: Hurricane Ike/2008 Kolb Homecoming
I just finished talking to him..... he lost part of a fence, and of course no power, but he's fine otherwise. He moved his plane from its regular place to a more secure hangar, and it turned out to be a good move.... the roof came off his original hangar. -- Robert On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 10:49 AM, George Alexander wrote: > > > John Hauck wrote: > > > > We got some more Kolb folks down that way also. > > > > > > > Anyone hear from Jimmy Young yet? > > -------- > George Alexander > FS II R503 N709FS > http://gtalexander.home.att.net > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4096#204096 > > -- David Lee Roth - "I used to jog but the ice cubes kept falling out of my glass." ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Fw: FAASafety.gov - General Information "Law Enforcement Assistance
Program"
Date: Sep 13, 2008
I just received this from the FAA. Note the attached link https://www.faasafety.gov/files/notices/2008/Sep/LEAP_Brochure.pdf The area of concern is the need to fill out and carry a FAA form 337 when flying with a aux fuel tank in my passenger seat. The brochure indicates that this form must be filled out, carried, and presented to law enforcement officials when requested. The form is for major modifications to an aircraft. This isn't even a true "installation" in my plane any more than a passenger is an installation but? Any thoughts Rick Neilsen Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC ----- Original Message ----- From: FAASafety.gov Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 10:14 PM Subject: FAASafety.gov - General Information "Law Enforcement Assistance Program" Law Enforcement Assistance Program Notice Number: NOTC1361 Law Enforcement Assistance Program The Security and Hazardous Materials Division of the FAA has a new brochure that reminds applicants of certain questions when completing applications for Part 61 (Pilots), Part 65 (Mechanics), and Part 67 (Medical Certificates). Read the questions carefully concerning drug convictions and any other felony convictions and answer appropriately. Instructors, because of their unique position as mentors, are especially reminded to review with applicants the questions on the application. The brochure contains an extract of pertinent questions pertaining to the regulations. The new brochure can be viewed at the link shown below. You can cut and paste this link into your Internet browser if clicking on it does not work. https://www.faasafety.gov/files/notices/2008/Sep/LEAP_Brochure.pdf See the brochure for points of contact for your state. Questions and comments can be directed to the LEAP Coordinator, Joseph Garcia, 202-493-5402. You have received this notice from FAASafety.gov because you have selected "General Information" in your preferences on your FAASafety.gov account. Click here to log in and edit your preferences on FAASafety.gov. FAASTeam CFI Workshops start this Fall. Watch for them in SPANS... FAASafety.gov | Email Preferences | Opt Out Do not reply to this email as it is an unmonitored alias. Contact us for comments or questions. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
Date: Sep 13, 2008
| Now that said, I wouldn't worry about something like aeroquip line which even tho it's opaque, it's also not the rank stuff from the auto parts place either ;). | | | LS LS: I got into UL'ing initially because it was the only way I could figure out how to fly again after retiring as an Army aviator. I chose to live on my retirement beginning at the ripe old age of 40. So far, nearly 29 years later, I have survived and have thoroughly enjoyed my last 24 years of experimental flying. If I deleted all the items on my airplane that were obtained from Wal-Mart and "rank stuff from the auto parts place", I would be permanently grounded. I find if a builder uses his head, he can obtain safe, reliable, efficient hardware to keep his bird flying, at much less expense than buying expensive aircraft stuff because it looks slick, and real airplanes are Federally mandated to be equipped that way. Thank God for a little freedom of choice. I am not knocking Steve B's beautifully finished FF that walked off with the S&F Grand Champion UL 2008 trophy. However, I was able to bring home the same trophy in 1988 for my FS, plus two Gold Lindy Trophies from OSH, 1989 and 1993, using my old philosophy of using good quality stuff that will get me there and back without worrying whether it will or not, for half the price. I think the record of my airplanes indicates it can be done. Been thinking about inspecting clear fuel line vs my black neoprene fuel line. First, I can't see all my fuel line. Most of it is hidden inside the fuselage. Based on my experience with plastic line, in most cases, one could not tell if it was serviceable or not by looking at it. Took a hand and a pull to see if it was going to fall apart or not. Sometimes the pulse line or a fuel line would do just that. The beauty of our system of experimental airplanes is, for the most part, our freedom to equip and fly our aircraft the way we want to. Personal choice means a lot to me and I respect others freedom for personal choice. However, I am still looking for a valid requirement to see the little bubbles in my fuel line. ;-) john h - Glad to hear everyone, so far, is ok down Texas way. mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: FAASafety.gov - General Information "Law Enforcement Assista
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 13, 2008
NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net wrote: > I just received this from the FAA. Note the attached link https://www.faasafety.gov/files/notices/2008/Sep/LEAP_Brochure.pdf () > > The area of concern is the need to fill out and carry a FAA form 337 when flying with a aux fuel tank in my passenger seat. The brochure indicates that this form must be filled out, carried, and presented to law enforcement officials when requested. The form is for major modifications to an aircraft. This isn't even a true "installation" in my plane any more than a passenger is an installation but? > > Any thoughts > > Rick Neilsen > Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC > > --- It sounds like this only applies if you've actually attached a "fuel tank" - i.e if it's been added to the fuel system with fuel lines, pump and etc. Yeah that would definitely count as a modification for purposes of the regs I should think. It's definitely an "installation" of an aux fuel tank. If it's just a can of gas all sealed up, set in the back seat and therefore not part of the fuel system, I don't see that it would count as a mod........ LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4116#204116 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: FAASafety.gov - General Information "Law Enforcement Assista
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 13, 2008
If there is not a line attached to the tank, it is not a mod, its just cargo. If you hook it into the fuel system, it MIGHT be considered a mod, but that could also be subject to interpretation of whoever you run into. If you were worried about it, I would just make it so that I could quickly connect and disconnect to the fuel system as needed, making it nothing but a gas can carried as cargo whenever you are at somewhere you might get inspected.. Also, as an experimental plane, I think you are allowed to make modifications without a bunch of paperwork. It seems that this restriction that FAA is talking about would apply to a certified aircraft, but I would not think that it would apply to experimental, it would be worth checking into. The EAA would know for sure, its a free call. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4125#204125 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Firestar II Center of Gravity?
From: "Goodone" <goodone41(at)verizon.net>
Date: Sep 13, 2008
Would there be any Center-of-Gravity (c.g.) concerns with a Firestar II powered by a Rotax 503+"C" Gear Box+ Rotax Intake Silencer+3 Blade Warp Drive Prop? I had a good friend that had an accident in a Firestar II that might well be explained if this rather heavy power plant system would result in an aft c.g. He was a rather slim fellow probably weighing around 160 lbs. I would appreciate any information that you might provide. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4144#204144 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Curtiss America
Date: Sep 13, 2008
Well it may not be a Kolb, but it IS an experimental and a pusher (x2) -and I got to see it fly today. A marvelous effort and a beautiful flying machine. 72' wingspan, 2 100 hp Curtiss OXX-6 engines. First one flew right here in 1914 DSCN1727.JPG copy got off quickly and ran smoothly DSCN1730.JPG copy DSCN1735.JPG copy

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 13, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Curtiss America
At 06:32 PM 9/13/2008, robert bean wrote: >Well it may not be a Kolb, but it IS an experimental and a pusher (x2) >-and I got to see it fly today. A marvelous effort and a beautiful >flying machine. >72' wingspan, 2 100 hp Curtiss OXX-6 engines. >First one flew right here in 1914 Cool! That's actually quite a beautiful airplane. -Dana -- Black holes are where God is dividing by zero. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: N27SB(at)aol.com
Date: Sep 13, 2008
Subject: Re: fuel line?
Buddy John, No knock taken. Bryan and I were just showin off. It is far and above what is required for an Ultralight. It sure was fun doing it that way though. Much of what I do I have learned from the pioneers of UL like yourself. Past Trophy winners have set the Bar pretty high so you have to work hard to keep up. However, I do worry about the use of Gates Auto Fuel Line when you run oil mix through it. Had some break down on me. Steve B Firefly 007/Floats Firefly 0040/ Floats 2008 SnF Grand Champion In a message dated 9/13/2008 1:19:35 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com writes: I am not knocking Steve B's beautifully finished FF that walked off with the S&F Grand Champion UL 2008 trophy. However, I was able to bring home the same trophy in 1988 for my FS, plus two Gold Lindy Trophies from OSH, 1989 and 1993, using my old philosophy of using good quality stuff that will get me there and back without worrying whether it will or not, for half the price. **************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com. (http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
Date: Sep 13, 2008
Steve B: I have heard of folks having problems with fuel/oil mix and neoprene fuel l ine. However, it has been many years ago. Probably have not heard of prob lems now because I do not pay that much attention to two strokes and their inherent problems, unless I am going to be flying one at an air show. I think this problem is like others we encounter. Its a one in a thousand or million thing. I imagine today there is good fuel line, line Yamaha Mar ine, that will get the job done. Must be. Look at the thousands of jet sk iis and snow machines that used neoprene fuel line and mixed fuel/oil in th e old days. Still looking for valid reasons to look at the little bubbles in the clear plastic line. ;-) No one has come up with a good reason yet. I think it is a carry over from the early days of UL'ing when everybody used it. Hell , I thought we were supposed to use it, when I got into UL'ing. john h - with a freshly cut 750 feet of Gantt International Airport. Smoot hed out the cow crap too! mkIII I do worry about the use of Gates Auto Fuel Line when you run oil mix throu gh it. Had some break down on me. Steve B ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 13, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
At 07:55 PM 9/13/2008, John Hauck wrote: > >Still looking for valid reasons to look at the little bubbles in the clear >plastic line. ;-) No one has come up with a good reason yet... I don't want to look at the little bubbles... I want to look and verify that there AREN'T any little bubbles! Almost lost my US on its first flight, when a fuel line blockage cause either air to be sucked in or cavitation, I don't know... but it was a steady stream of bubbles that I saw after getting it back down. The blockage passed enough fuel for anything less than full throttle, and the carb bowl held just enough to get airborne up to around 100' where things got exciting... now part of my preflight is to look for bubbles during a full power runup. That's a good enough reason for me. -Dana -- Grow your own dope! Plant a politician! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
Date: Sep 13, 2008
Dana: What kind of bubbles are you seeing? air or fuel vapor? I'm no engineer or chemist, but if I shake a container of gasoline, it prod uces a lot of fuel vapor. Enough to expand a 5 gal plastic jug or blow the lid off a Folgers plastic coffee container. I bet a fuel line being moved and vibrated by a healthy two stroke would also produce bubbles that looke d just like air bubbles. Those bubbles used to drive me crazy, back in the early days. I chased the m every way I could, and still could not completely eliminate them. Black line, can't see'em. Out of sight, out of mind. ;-) Takes a hell of a leak to let air enter a fuel line, especially one that is under vacuum and on a push on hose barb. Unless the plastic line is stret ched and hardened, it shouldn't leak, even without a clamp. Neoprene is th e same way. I have a heck of a time getting the fuel line off the hose bar b on the fuel filter to check it. john h mkIII now part of my preflight is to look for bubbles during a full power runup. That's a good enough reason for me. -Dana ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 13, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Ultrastar crash
This is a few weeks old, anybody hear about it? Man injured after plane crash The Capital-Journal Published Monday, August 18, 2008 OLSBURG An ultra-light plane crash Saturday evening north of Manhattan sent the pilot to a Topeka hospital with injuries he sustained in the accident, the Kansas Highway Patrol said. The pilot, who was the only person on board the aircraft, was identified as Bill Johnson, 58, of Olsburg. He was taken to Stormont-Vail Regional Health Center in Topeka, the patrol said. The crash occurred when the engine stalled in the homemade Kolb UltraStar plane that Johnson was piloting, the patrol said. The plane went down near Booth Creek, a half-mile south of K-16 highway in Pottawatomie County. From http://www.cjonline.com/stories/081808/kan_319878042.shtml -Dana -- Grow your own dope! Plant a politician! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
Date: Sep 13, 2008
I have the black stuff. Could be NAPA, Pep Boys, Tractor Supply? dunno but Im not too concerned. I run only low pressure. I noticed a little black dusty (colloidal?) residue initially but that has subsided. The hose is stiffer than new (at least something is getting stiffer with age) but since part of it is in the windstream I consider that a plus. When it gets about 5-6 years years old I'll replace it. IMO the 2 stroke world has totally different circumstances to deal with than do us 4 strokers. BB On 13, Sep 2008, at 8:30 PM, John Hauck wrote: > Dana: > > What kind of bubbles are you seeing? air or fuel vapor? > > I'm no engineer or chemist, but if I shake a container of gasoline, > it produces a lot of fuel vapor. Enough to expand a 5 gal plastic > jug or blow the lid off a Folgers plastic coffee container. I bet > a fuel line being moved and vibrated by a healthy two stroke would > also produce bubbles that looked just like air bubbles. > > Those bubbles used to drive me crazy, back in the early days. I > chased them every way I could, and still could not completely > eliminate them. > > Black line, can't see'em. Out of sight, out of mind. ;-) > > Takes a hell of a leak to let air enter a fuel line, especially one > that is under vacuum and on a push on hose barb. Unless the > plastic line is stretched and hardened, it shouldn't leak, even > without a clamp. Neoprene is the same way. I have a heck of a > time getting the fuel line off the hose barb on the fuel filter to > check it. > > john h > mkIII > > > now part of my preflight is to look for bubbles during a full > power runup. > > That's a good enough reason for me. > > -Dana > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 13, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
At 08:30 PM 9/13/2008, John Hauck wrote: >Dana: > >What kind of bubbles are you seeing? air or fuel vapor? > >...Takes a hell of a leak to let air enter a fuel line, especially one >that is under vacuum and on a push on hose barb... I'm not seeing _any_ bubbles, any more. At the time, I assumed they were air bubbles, but I really don't know. The brand new primer bulb was bad, and at full throttle there was a steady stream of bubbles downstream of the fuel filter (which was downstream of the primer). Drove me crazy for awhile, I was chasing what I thought were leaks, replacing hose clamps, the filter, etc., until I finally put the old bulb back in and the problem went away. If I ever have such a problem again, I want to SEE it during runup, not have to wait until I'm airborne. -Dana -- If at first you DO succeed, try not to look astonished! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Souder" <flykolb(at)pa.net>
Subject: Curtiss America
Date: Sep 13, 2008
Actually at Old Kolb we built something very similar - but much smaller - actually about half that size with 2 Cuyunas. We called it the WireStar. Dennis, -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of robert bean Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 6:33 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Curtiss America Well it may not be a Kolb, but it IS an experimental and a pusher (x2) -and I got to see it fly today. A marvelous effort and a beautiful flying machine. 72' wingspan, 2 100 hp Curtiss OXX-6 engines. First one flew right here in 1914 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Souder" <flykolb(at)pa.net>
Subject: Curtiss America
Date: Sep 13, 2008
Just kidding about the WireStar :-) Dennis -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of robert bean Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 6:33 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Curtiss America Well it may not be a Kolb, but it IS an experimental and a pusher (x2) -and I got to see it fly today. A marvelous effort and a beautiful flying machine. 72' wingspan, 2 100 hp Curtiss OXX-6 engines. First one flew right here in 1914 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jimmy Young" <jdy100(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Hurricane Ike/2008 Kolb Homecoming
Date: Sep 13, 2008
Kolbers, Here is a picture of what is left of my hanger at Alvin Airpark as a result of Hurricane Ike. Luckily I had moved my plane on Thursday to a more secure hanger that wasn't damaged. We have no power and probably won't have for a while, but my home is in good shape. I haven't seen any news so I don't know what all damage has occured elsewhere, but I'm sure Galveston and anything along the bay is torn up. I'm going to TNK on Friday, looking forward to some Kolb fellowship! Jimmy Young FS II - Houston ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
Date: Sep 13, 2008
Dana: Would be interesting to know how many UL forced landings were caused by pri mer bulbs. 1987, I was making my first long cross country flight from my airstrip in A labama to Miami, FL, in my Firestar. I spent the weekend with the Florida Flying Gators at their airstrip in Central Florida. While there, and durin g some enjoyable flying, I was experiencing some intermittent power losses. Not enough to kill the engine, but not developing full power. It was no big cause for alarm. We were always having some sort of problem with engin es back in those days. I departed first thing Monday morning. A short time later I was over Sebri ng, Florida. Power was starting to bleed off my mighty 447. If I went ful l throttle, it would try to die on me. I ended up turning about 4000 rpm, just enough to keep me aloft. Closest forced landing area was the Sebring High School football field. I had to do something. Did not want to lose t he engine over down town Sebring. Made a decision and landed on the foot b all field. No brakes were installed. Started unloading stuff to get to th e fuel system. The bell rang and here comes a whole flock of HS students t o see what the funny little airplane was doing on their foot ball field. F ound my problem. A tiny ball of silicone seal had fouled the intake valve on the primer bulb. Was only letting enough fuel through to keep the engin e running at low power, but that was all. The reason the silicone seal end ed up in the fuel system was lack of education working with silicone seal. This was before most of us learned that silicone seal and gasoline did not get along with each other. I had used a dab to seal the vent in the Ken B rock seat tank to keep the cap from leaking should I get inverted. I had i nstalled a seperate fuel tank vent line that exited out the bottom of the f uselage. The reason I had done this was an engine failure that resulted in my brand new Firestar ending up on its back in the middle of a cotton fiel d. While I was trying to get out to the cockpit, gasoline was leaking out of the cap and down my neck into my helmet. I was very near a panic situat ion. That little piece of silicone seal is what put me down. We also went through a lot of problems with paper element fuel filters. A drop of water would cause the element to expand and cut off the fuel flow. Took a lot of engine failures from Woodville, FL, to Titus, AL, to figure that one out. john h mkIII The brand new primer bulb was bad, -Dana ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Firestar II Center of Gravity?
From: "N111KX (Kip)" <n111kx(at)mindspring.com>
Date: Sep 13, 2008
As every Firestar is different, it's impossible to say exactly if the aircraft was out of CG. But, I have found that the FS tends to be an "aft" CG biased airplane more than forward with pilot weights of less than 180lbs or so. I can say that I have operated my FS aft of the factory suggested CG range as I am even lighter than your friend. That said, I have yet to find any dangerous flight characteristics in this CG area, even with spin entry and recovery. Again, the model in question may have been mis-rigged, or any number of other discrepancies to contribute to the accident. Kip -------- Kip Firestar II, N111KX Waiex, N111YX Quickie 1, N111QX Atlanta Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4188#204188 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 13, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
At 09:33 PM 9/13/2008, John Hauck wrote: > >Would be interesting to know how many UL forced landings were caused by >primer bulbs. > ...A tiny ball of silicone seal had fouled the intake valve on the > primer bulb.... Probably quite a few. Although, of course, yours wasn't actually caused by the primer. I've since removed the primer bulb and replaced it with a plunger primer. Still have the bulbs on my PPG's, though, with no problems. >We also went through a lot of problems with paper element fuel filters. A >drop of water would cause the element to expand and cut off the fuel flow... I have a screen filter on my US, don't think I'd want a paper filter there... OTOH, again, I used them on my PPG's for years with no problems. Of course an engine out in a PPG is usually much less of an issue than in a Kolb! -Dana -- Censorship: The reaction of the ignorant to freedom. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Hurricane Ike/2008 Kolb Homecoming
Date: Sep 13, 2008
Good news, Jimmy, See you at the Kolb Homecoming Fri. john h mkIII I'm going to TNK on Friday, looking forward to some Kolb fellowship! Jimmy Young FS II - Houston ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ted Cowan" <tc1917(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: resonance 912
Date: Sep 14, 2008
Well, thanks to you all with your wonderful suggestions concerning the hum hum of my little 912. I want to report that I still have it live and strong as ever. I built two 60 degree elbows for the exhaust flanges of my titan exhaust system -- did not help. actually it made the exhaust louder. did not affect the resonance. I already went from none to four inch spacer and back to two inch which I have today. I was told it was not the gear box because there was no scrap in the oil. (I still believe it is the spacers in the box or an elliptical gear or something that is not actually tearing it apart. I dont seem to be able to get the 'AUTHORIZED DEALERS AND REPAIR CENTERS' to care or want to do anything about it. I even offered to pay them out of my pocket.) I have padded just about everything padable. I put my windows in - Haucks suggestion - wow, was that hot inside. I like free air while I am flying. No joy, still there. I was told by a prop person, Kiev Props that their prop would help in a lot of ways but the prop was probably not the producer of the sound, just the amplifier. So, there I am. When we get to the Homecoming, you all can hear it from the ground and while I am in the air and solve this mystery for me. Looking forward to seeing you all again. Ted Cowan, Alabama, Slingshot, 912 UL ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: fuel line?
From: "Thom Riddle" <riddletr(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 14, 2008
>From Dave Bidelow: Quote: Jack, do you have a source for these two types of fuel line? Thanks. Dave, Both of the Tygon brand lines mentioned in this thread as well as St. Gobain's recommended F4040A Tygon are available from McMaster-Carr at www.mcmaster.com . They are my preferred supplier because of their excellent customer service, fast shipping and good prices. -------- Thom Riddle CFI-SP Power Plant Mechanic N221FA Allegro 2000 912UL N197BG FS1/447 -------------------- Scratch any cynic, he said, and youll find a disappointed idealist. George Carlin Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4220#204220 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 14, 2008
From: "trader(at)fotoubuff.com" <trader(at)fotobuff.com>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
Hi Tom and gang \ the 4040 is better than most other tubing, and is a great choice. Just so people dont go and use some of the bad blue stuff that was out there. it looked good, felt good, worked good for about 90 and then cracked, rotted and gelled and fell apart. if it doesnt say tygon 4040 or Tygothane c210 or Superthane I will no longer use it. although i do have some NOS 1/8 primer line that was not labeled on the tubing. but says C210 a on the box of 100 ft. My data was From both companys http://www.tygon.com/Data/Element/Node/ProductLine/product_line_edit.asp?ele_ch_id=L0000000000000001506 I have called Saint-Gobain and New age, and many of the technicians recommendation is the Ester base polyurethane. because of the extra durability. although the 4040 A is good the recommendation, and is highly used for fuel, it is softer. the c210 is the extra toughness and and durability, again this is from the manufactures, I have also read misleading or incomplete descriptions on other websites that sell the stuff. actually contradictions, that is why I have called both mfgs. there is always errors even in opinions. ps> mcmaster carr says not use c210 in water it will crack. ( where did this come from?) Surely not StGobain. at this point we all have to do research.! surely we are not running or keeping water in our tanks, we are not keeping water around our tubing, and getting it wet in the rain is not going to deteriorate the line. It may just mean dont use it on a boat and keeping it submerged in the Hull. with fuel inside it? I have had Tygothane on my planes for 6+ years (it is probably time to change) but has little signs of any change(aging etc) whatsoever. Jackofmosttrades >Dave, >Both of the Tygon brand lines mentioned in this thread as well as St. Gobain's recommended F4040A Tygon are available from McMaster-Carr at www.mcmaster.com . > >They are my preferred supplier because of their excellent customer service, fast shipping and good prices. > >-------- >Thom Riddle >CFI-SP >Power Plant Mechanic >N221FA Allegro 2000 912UL >N197BG FS1/447 >-------------------- > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steven Green" <Kolbdriver(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: resonance 912
Date: Sep 14, 2008
Ted, Is the noise cyclicle in amplitude? If so there may be two fundamental frequencies creating a "beat". Is the wing fabric noticable tighter on one wing than on the other, in the prop area? If I remember correctly you said that the noise was independant of engine speed. What about air speed, does it change with air speed? Does it do it in a high speed decent with the engine at idle. Did you say it would do it during a static run up? Steven Green Hope to see ya'll in London soon ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: nice flight
Date: Sep 14, 2008
Part of a post I sent to Russ. Just thought it might interest someone. My comments about filling etc. applied to the Kolb. My pump is just a plastic pipe, about 3/4"bore, 3 ft long, straight with a cap to screw into a barrel (which I have never used) the pump is hand operated, straight push pull with a stroke of about 5 inches. This drives the fuel through a flexible plastic hose into the tank.Not very fast I admit but as a light pump to carry about in the KOlb it works fine. Just had a pleasant 40 minute flight. No wind but bad viz until mid day, cleared this afternoon so I grabbed the chance. My field is only about 15 minutes away. Flew along our valley, which is about 10 miles wide with about 600ft high hills either side. Very smooth. Pushed her up to 90 mpg at 3000 revs. Solid as a rock. Usually cruise at 70 at 2600 revs. Flew over Avebury stone circle and Silbury Hill, largest manmade hill in Europe. No one knows why it was built. Also the remains of a few crop circles still showing. One romantic farmer had mowed his field in the shape of a gigantic heart. Wind has changed today and the sun is almost obliterated with a high haze. More rain during the night I would expect. Will it never stop? This summer has been almost wiped out. Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 14, 2008
From: gary aman <gaman(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Firestar II Center of Gravity?
My FS-2 with b box and pull start and my 170#s required some ballast to get into the recommended cg range.I think it could be possible with that combination of equipment and pilot to have an issue. Mine required 15# in the nose to feel right, although many on this list have had success aerodynamically trimming their Kolbs to fly well without the addition of ballast. My 2 cents worth. ----- Original Message ---- From: Goodone <goodone41(at)verizon.net> Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 4:38:57 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Firestar II Center of Gravity? Would there be any Center-of-Gravity (c.g.) concerns with a Firestar II powered by a Rotax 503+"C" Gear Box+ Rotax Intake Silencer+3 Blade Warp Drive Prop? I had a good friend that had an accident in a Firestar II that might well be explained if this rather heavy power plant system would result in an aft c.g. He was a rather slim fellow probably weighing around 160 lbs. I would appreciate any information that you might provide. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4144#204144 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 14, 2008
From: gary aman <gaman(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
Have had the pump primer o-ring seal fail on a FS.No leaks of fuel but a solid string of bubbles entering the fuel line from the primer thru the T fitting.Was part of the pre flight after that .Pull start then check lines for bubbles. ----- Original Message ---- From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 8:10:48 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: fuel line? At 07:55 PM 9/13/2008, John Hauck wrote: Still looking for valid reasons to look at the little bubbles in the clear plastic line. ;-) No one has come up with a good reason yet... I don't want to look at the little bubbles... I want to look and verify that there AREN'T any little bubbles! Almost lost my US on its first flight, when a fuel line blockage cause either air to be sucked in or cavitation, I don't know... but it was a steady stream of bubbles that I saw after getting it back down. The blockage passed enough fuel for anything less than full throttle, and the carb bowl held just enough to get airborne up to around 100' where things got exciting... now part of my preflight is to look for bubbles during a full power runup. That's a good enough reason for me. -Dana -- Grow your own dope! Plant a politician! ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Firestar II Center of Gravity?
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 14, 2008
Goodone wrote: > Would there be any Center-of-Gravity (c.g.) concerns with a Firestar II powered by a Rotax 503+"C" Gear Box+ Rotax Intake Silencer+3 Blade Warp Drive Prop? I had a good friend that had an accident in a Firestar II that might well be explained if this rather heavy power plant system would result in an aft c.g. He was a rather slim fellow probably weighing around 160 lbs. I would appreciate any information that you might provide. My old FS II was setup exactly like that (well with a clutch but also without silencers on the engine) and the builder put 10lbs of ballast in the nose to get the CG to come out right. He flew it for a while without the ballast; with him (large guy about 210 lbs) and full gas it was right at the aft limit. He didn't like the way it flew and put the ballast in to correct it. Monster performance with that huge prop tho... well worth the additional weight.... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4273#204273 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 15, 2008
From: "Richard Girard" <aslsa.rng(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Resonance
Ted, I went back through all the posts about your resonance problem and the one thing I can't find mention of under the things you've tried is balancing the carbs. Before you spend money on tearing your gearbox apart or a new prop you might want want to consider spending less than $100 on a set of vacuum gauges. You can buy them all set up and ready to use from suppliers like Lockwood or buy the gauges and damper valves from someplace like McMaster Carr. I did the latter and didn't save a dime over Lockwood's price. :-{ The entire procedure is documented in the Rotax manual ( I'll look it up in the morning and get you chapter and verse ) and takes less than an hour. First you do the mechanical synching then the pneumatic with the gauges. I've documented my experience with my HKS and despite the fact that I couldn't hear or feel anything wrong, the carbs were 3" vacuum different at 3000 RPM. When I pneumatically balanced them engine RPM increased to 3500.In one of your posts you commented that the rum rum was like a twin with the engines out of synch. Not having your carbs synched is basically that. Two cylinders are carrying more load than the other two. I don't know that this is the be all end all of your problem but if you haven't done it recently I'd recommend you do it or get it done if for no other reason than it's the cheapest of all the other options you've proposed doing. Rick PS. I also stick to my other recommendation that I sent to you off line. If you can't kill the resonance directly softer engine mounts will dampen it. If the good folks at TNK don't carry mounts of varying hardness they might be able to point you to their supplier so you can contact them and see if they're available. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: resonance
From: "Dave Bigelow" <up_country(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 15, 2008
Ted, This is probably a longshot, but I had some noise issues somewhat like yours with my Firestar. I thought it was related to the Rotax 503, but when I changed to the HKS engine, I still had the noise. Turned out to be the cables at the tail. The airflow of either the propwash (on the ground) or the airstream in flight caused them to vibrate (strum). I tightened them some, and the strumming went away. Hope this is the problem, since the solution is simple and cheap. -------- Dave Bigelow Kamuela, Hawaii FS2, HKS 700E Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4345#204345 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ted Cowan" <tc1917(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: resonance 912
Date: Sep 15, 2008
Okay, the easy answer first. Yes, first time out the gate, at Miss Lite, a year ago October, I suspected that was it. Was told by Ronny Smith that it was not the carbs, it needed the expensive four inch spacer (which I had but not installed). I installed it. Same-O. Later, purchased vacuum gauges and went after the carbs. Set them and checked them -- four times in so many months. No joy. Took off the four inch spacer and bought another two inch spacer (needed different bolts of course) still no joy. balanced better for flying though and left it on. Thought maybe it was noise from the prop hub and bought another expensive play pretty spinner. Looks good. No workie. Now, it makes the noise on run up from about 3500 on, on the ground!!!! Makes no difference how fast I am flying, it is there. I have it on decent for landing, feathered back, just not as loud, same beat though. Taking off, full throttle, I dont notice it cause of all the extra noise but as soon as I pull back -- it says "I'm baaaack!". On to the fabric. Although it maybe coming from there, why would it not change in beat? I have taped up the wing area approximately where it should be on both wings, no change in sound. I padded the back, sides, top inside and around, no change, just maybe not as loud to me in the cabin. It is not a thumping sound. It is a metallic sound to me as gears meshing or washers running. I am so convinced it is in the gear box, I will PAY someone to check it (must be a qualified rotax mech) and then if it is in there, I can get it on warrantee. Just wait and hear it yourself next week. Going to be an expensive run from here to there but I just hope I will be able to get gas along the way. See ya there. Ted Cowan, Alabama, Slingshot 912UL ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Denny Rowe" <rowedenny(at)windstream.net>
Subject: Slingshot 582 cooling setup
Date: Sep 15, 2008
Kolbers, My friend Dave Lewis is trying to figure out how to route the lower hose that joins his dual, rear mounted rads on the 582 Slingshot he bought. The airframe and engine mounts make quite a maze, complete with sharp edges. Also the lower hose nipples on the rads face forward pointing the wrong way for easy hose routing. Any pics you have would be helpful. He is getting close to first start up since he bought it and this is the last problem that needs resolved. Thanks, Dennis Rowe, Mk-3, PA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: resonance 912
Date: Sep 15, 2008
Ted, this is a long shot, but are your cylinder compressions equal? BB On 15, Sep 2008, at 6:07 AM, Ted Cowan wrote: > > Okay, the easy answer first. Yes, first time out the gate, at Miss > Lite, a year ago October, I suspected that was it. Was told by > Ronny Smith that it was not the carbs, it needed the expensive four > inch spacer (which I had but not installed). I installed it. Same- > O. Later, purchased vacuum gauges and went after the carbs. Set > them and checked them -- four times in so many months. No joy. > Took off the four inch spacer and bought another two inch spacer > (needed different bolts of course) still no joy. balanced better > for flying though and left it on. Thought maybe it was noise from > the prop hub and bought another expensive play pretty spinner. > Looks good. No workie. > Now, it makes the noise on run up from about 3500 on, on the > ground!!!! Makes no difference how fast I am flying, it is there. > I have it on decent for landing, feathered back, just not as loud, > same beat though. Taking off, full throttle, I dont notice it > cause of all the extra noise but as soon as I pull back -- it says > "I'm baaaack!". > On to the fabric. Although it maybe coming from there, why would > it not change in beat? I have taped up the wing area approximately > where it should be on both wings, no change in sound. I padded the > back, sides, top inside and around, no change, just maybe not as > loud to me in the cabin. It is not a thumping sound. It is a > metallic sound to me as gears meshing or washers running. I am so > convinced it is in the gear box, I will PAY someone to check it > (must be a qualified rotax mech) and then if it is in there, I can > get it on warrantee. Just wait and hear it yourself next week. > Going to be an expensive run from here to there but I just hope I > will be able to get gas along the way. See ya there. Ted Cowan, > Alabama, Slingshot 912UL > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 15, 2008
From: herb <herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Subject: Re: C box bearings
Looking at the cps catalog...I see that the bearings for the c and e gear boxes are the same 932-420 #23 is a 6205 C3 , 932-820 #14 is a 6305 C3, 932-570 is a 6306 C3.. C3 means deep groove near as I can tell.. All seals seem to be standard...off the shelf parts.. same for bearings.. The difference being that they are about one fourth to one third as expensive as CPS prices... That said...ran into a wall...with the roller bearing that supports the back of the propeller shaft.. #11... $101 at CPS.. I can measure it and come up with a fit..but would be nice to have the generic number if someone on the list has it at hand... The oil seals run from 20 to 70 bucks...at CPS.. usually cost 3 or 4 bucks each at a bearing house... Herb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 15, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: resonance 912
One bit of useful data to solve the resonance problem is to know the frequencies. When you hear a "beat frequency" resonance, like a twin engine airplane with the engines out of synch, the beat frequency is equal to the difference in the primary frequencies. For example, if one engine is turning 3000 rpm and the other is at 3060 rpm, that's a 60 rpm difference or 1 cycle per second, i.e. the beat frequency would have a 1 second period. Timing the beat period and comparing it to the other various speeds (engine rpm, exhaust pulse frequency, reduction ratio, etc.) may lead to a match which points to the source. -Dana -- He's dead, Jim. Grab his tricorder and his wallet. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: C box bearings
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 15, 2008
herbgh(at)nctc.com wrote: > Looking at the cps catalog...I see that the bearings for the c and e > gear boxes are the same 932-420 #23 is a 6205 C3 , 932-820 #14 > is a 6305 C3, 932-570 is a 6306 C3.. C3 means deep groove near as I > can tell.. All seals seem to be standard...off the shelf > parts.. same for bearings.. The difference being that they are > about one fourth to one third as expensive as CPS prices... > > That said...ran into a wall...with the roller bearing that > supports the back of the propeller shaft.. #11... $101 at > CPS.. I can measure it and come up with a fit..but would be nice > to have the generic number if someone on the list has it at hand... > > The oil seals run from 20 to 70 bucks...at CPS.. usually cost 3 > or 4 bucks each at a bearing house... Herb If they're like the crank seals on the 2-strokes, the Rotax parts are not the same as the aftermarket ones (the rotax parts have a Viton coating on the inner lip). I still have my old C box off the original motor that was on my FS II. I remember talking about it with the builder - it had had an aftermarket seal put in it but it continued to leak. Replacement with a rotax seal fixed the problem. So I suspect the Rotax part is probably required. Try lockwood aviation or Ronnie Smith - they may have a lower price... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4394#204394 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 15, 2008
From: herb <herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Subject: Re: C box bearings and seals
LS Thanks...Searching the web...I find that there are all kinds of seals available.. Viton included... Double lip also... I feel certain that there is no rocket science in this box... neither special seals or bearings .. special parts otherwise...naturally.. Ronnie is one of the good guys...likely will have cross references to generic parts... Was your lower drive shaft seal leaking? Herb At 11:42 AM 9/15/2008, you wrote: > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steven Green" <Kolbdriver(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Slingshot 582 cooling setup
Date: Sep 15, 2008
Denny, Is This what you want? Steven ----- Original Message ----- From: Denny Rowe To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 6:39 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Slingshot 582 cooling setup Kolbers, My friend Dave Lewis is trying to figure out how to route the lower hose that joins his dual, rear mounted rads on the 582 Slingshot he bought. The airframe and engine mounts make quite a maze, complete with sharp edges. Also the lower hose nipples on the rads face forward pointing the wrong way for easy hose routing. Any pics you have would be helpful. He is getting close to first start up since he bought it and this is the last problem that needs resolved. Thanks, Dennis Rowe, Mk-3, PA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: gliderx5(at)comcast.net
Subject: Wind ramage to trailer
Date: Sep 16, 2008
Well, it got a little windy in PA last night, and my trailer took a beating. The tarp disintegrated and the steel brackets that hold the tongue jack tore and the jack folded. The MKII appears to be just fine however. I went out tonight and quickly recovered the trailer with a new tarp to protect the Kolb. I will work on a better fix later. Still having a lot of fun with the MKII. Malcolm Morrison ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: C box bearings
From: "R. Hankins" <rphanks(at)grantspass.com>
Date: Sep 15, 2008
Herb, I've been working with bearings on a daily basis for the last ten years or so. Thought you might want to know that C3 is a reference to bearing internal clearance, not the type of bearing. C3 bearings are called for where you have a condition that can reduce the internal clearance of the bearing (such as high temperature, the outer race pressed into a bore, and/or the inner race being press fit over a shaft). Bearing catalogs will tell you that C3 bearings have extra clearance compared to "normal" bearings, but C3 is the default today. If there is nothing listed after the bearing number, it is a safe bet that it is a C3 (usually with two rubber seals). I have had difficulty finding replacement C2 (low clearance) and "normal" bearings for applications where they are required. Here is good link to the basics: http://www.bearing-king.co.uk/how-to-measure-a-bearing.php -------- Roger in Oregon 1992 KXP 503 - N1782C Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4482#204482 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 15, 2008
From: herb <herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Subject: Re: C box bearings
Thanks Roger The CPS catalog simply indicates a generic number...ie: 6205 with the suffix C3.. I have seen that referred to as deep groove. Mean anything more? And how about seals...any preference towards lip compound? Viton? Herb At 08:17 PM 9/15/2008, you wrote: > >Herb, > >I've been working with bearings on a daily basis for the last ten >years or so. Thought you might want to know that C3 is a reference >to bearing internal clearance, not the type of bearing. C3 bearings >are called for where you have a condition that can reduce the >internal clearance of the bearing (such as high temperature, the >outer race pressed into a bore, and/or the inner race being press >fit over a shaft). > >Bearing catalogs will tell you that C3 bearings have extra clearance >compared to "normal" bearings, but C3 is the default today. If >there is nothing listed after the bearing number, it is a safe bet >that it is a C3 (usually with two rubber seals). I have had >difficulty finding replacement C2 (low clearance) and "normal" >bearings for applications where they are required. > >Here is good link to the basics: >http://www.bearing-king.co.uk/how-to-measure-a-bearing.php > >-------- >Roger in Oregon >1992 KXP 503 - N1782C > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4482#204482 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Denny Rowe" <rowedenny(at)windstream.net>
Subject: Re: Slingshot 582 cooling setup
Date: Sep 15, 2008
Steve, That is the kind of info we need, we have been looking at maybe lifting the engine and running the hose underneath, but I'll foreward your pic to dave and see what he thinks. Thanks Dennis ----- Original Message ----- From: Steven Green To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 7:36 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Slingshot 582 cooling setup Denny, Is This what you want? Steven ----- Original Message ----- From: Denny Rowe To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 6:39 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Slingshot 582 cooling setup Kolbers, My friend Dave Lewis is trying to figure out how to route the lower hose that joins his dual, rear mounted rads on the 582 Slingshot he bought. The airframe and engine mounts make quite a maze, complete with sharp edges. Also the lower hose nipples on the rads face forward pointing the wrong way for easy hose routing. Any pics you have would be helpful. He is getting close to first start up since he bought it and this is the last problem that needs resolved. Thanks, Dennis Rowe, Mk-3, PA ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 9/13/2008 12:50 PM ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: fuel line?
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 15, 2008
Dana wrote: > > I don't want to look at the little bubbles... I want to look and verify that there AREN'T any little bubbles! > > If your fuel system were properly designed, you would not have the need to look for little bubbles in the fuel line. There are thousands upon thousands of general aviation airplanes, both low wing, and high wing, and NONE of them had a place to look for bubbles in the fuel line. With a pressure fed fuel system, there are no problems with pinhole leaks resulting in engine failures. There is also no need for primer bulbs that fail, causing air, or blockages in the fuel line. A 40 dollar Facet pump solves all these problems and more. If you start to get vapor lock in flight, the ability to see those gas bubbles are forming in the fuel line is not going to make your engine run. I have to agree with you on one thing, if you are making the mistake of using a pump to suck fuel up from a tank, then you probably have a need to look for bubbles in the fuel line. I would much rather have a properly designed fuel system that is reliable rather than have such a poorly designed, substandard fuel system that I had to constantly inspect the lines and watch for bubbles. As far as the Rotax 912-S, Rotax has now changed the engine to include aviation fuel line covered by firesleeve from the fuel pump to the carburetors as standard equipment. You can not inspect this fuel line before each flight, you cant even see see the fuel line under the firesleeve, but with quality materials there is no need to. Someone at Rotax that has a lot more experience and knowlege than most here knew that it was worth the extra money to keep people from using substandard clear fuel line on the engine itself. I made the same mistake as many guys here and used the clear fuel line and two fuel pumps to suck fuel up from the tanks to the engine in my Kolb. When I saw all the bubbles forming in the line after the filter, it became obvious to me that this was hazardous and could cause an engine failure one day. The difference between me and many here is that I researched fuel system design, materials, and corrected my mistakes. Many here seem unable to admit to themselves that what they have been doing is wrong. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4509#204509 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: C box bearings
From: "R. Hankins" <rphanks(at)grantspass.com>
Date: Sep 15, 2008
Herb: > I have seen that referred to as deep groove. Mean > anything more? Deep groove ball bearings are radial ball bearings designed to take axial loads from both directions (tension and compression of the shaft, if you will). It is the standard sort of bearing you think of if someone says "ball bearing" All of the bearing numbers you listed above would be considered deep groove ball bearings. If you go with after market, stick with major brands such as SKF, FAG, NTN, INA, etc. and be sure to read the bearing itself to see where it was made. Location can vary widely even within the same brand. Of course stay away from China, Malaysia, India, etc. I have had good luck with USA, Japan, France, Austria, Germany, and the Czech Republic. The hidden cost in the original bearings might be tolerance class. The Austrians do not compromise quality when it comes to bearings. The engineers at Rotax have surely done their research and specified bearings with certain minimum and maximum clearances suitable to the temperatures, loads and mounting fits of the gearbox. Not all bearings with the same number and clearance rating are created equal. The smaller the tolerance range, the more expensive the bearing. There is really no way of knowing if your after-market bearing fits their spec (unless you can get some inside info on the spec). Your chances go way up if you buy the exact same brand, number, and clearance, made in the same country. In short I would think that with all of the time and effort expended to rebuild a gearbox, saving even a couple hundred bucks on bearings may not be cheap in the long run. If your gearbox fails and puts you down in a rough field or the trees, it will not seem like a good deal. On the other hand, it is entirely possible that the $12 bearings you purchase at the local bearing store will perform well. You do increase your chances (and the cost of course) vastly by buying from the gearbox manufacturer. -------- Roger in Oregon 1992 KXP 503 - N1782C Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4512#204512 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: fuel line?
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 15, 2008
Here are some pictures of my first fuel system. The last picture shows lots of bubbles that form in the gasoline after the fuel filter due to fuel being pulled through it rather than pushed. There was no leak, changing the fuel filter did not reduce the amount of bubbles flowing out of the filter. At what point are there enough bubbles that the engine would quit ??? I do not know... I do know that the amount of bubbles forming in the gas could greatly increase with altitude and temperature. The second picture shows more of my first fuel system, with the fuel line and the Facet pump sucking the fuel up on top of the cage, not good system design. This is vapor lock waiting to happen, or an engine out due to air entering through a pinhole leak causing the fuel pumps to lose their prime. The first picture shows my first fuel system with the clear line running up to the engine, and out to the carburetors. This type of fuel line melts very easily, and is also very thin and easily cut. This is a fire, or at least an engine failure waiting to happen. Rotax came up with a fix for their 912 engines, I copied what Rotax did and put aviation fuel line with firesleeve on my engine. Like John H. says, we are all free to chose what we do with our airplanes, and I agree. For those that like clear fuel line and always will, that is your choice, just be careful and keep inspecting it as often as possible... These posts and pictures are for those that want good information on fuel systems and their design. There is much more information about fuel systems than I know, or I could possibly present here, but hopefully this will start some people thinking. I would encourage everyone wondering about this subject to research recommended aviation fuel system design and materials to make Kolb as safe and reliable as possible. The EAA has a lot of excellent articles and suggestions on this subject. Fly Safe, Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4522#204522 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/ultralightmikekolbdetail01_18_2007_13_143.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/ultralightmikekolbdetail12_27_2006_114_958.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/fuellinebubbles1_169.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 16, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
At 12:01 AM 9/16/2008, JetPilot wrote: >If your fuel system were properly designed, you would not have the need to >look for little bubbles in the fuel line....There is also no need for >primer bulbs that fail, causing air, or blockages in the fuel line. A 40 >dollar Facet pump solves all these problems and more. If you start to get >vapor lock in flight, the ability to see those gas bubbles are forming in >the fuel line is not going to make your engine run. > >I have to agree with you on one thing, if you are making the mistake of >using a pump to suck fuel up from a tank, then you probably have a need to >look for bubbles in the fuel line..... When I saw all the bubbles forming >in the line after the filter, it became obvious to me that this was >hazardous..... Some of us don't have the luxury of pushing the fuel up with an electric fuel pump, and a pulse pump can be located only so far from the engine. I no longer have a primer bulb, but one can get a blockage from many things... including moisture in the paper filter shown in your pictures. -Dana -- Can I deduct last years taxes as a bad investment? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 16, 2008
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb List Re: fuel line
- On my 447 I had clear fuel line- Tygon- and a clear fuel filter.- I a lso questioned the bubbles in the line, and air in the filter.- I had tri ed bleeding the system, but always ended up with a visible flow of bubbles. - No apparent leaks or loose clamps.- John H. advised ignoring it, and it didn't seen to affect engine rpm.- Possibly it was cavitation, as the pulse pump was quite close to the engine, and the "lift" was over a foot. - Dana's last comment was that a pulse pump (Mikuni) could only be locate d a limited distance away from the engine.- How far can it be located fro m the engine?- Mine was bolted near the base of the engine, and it was ve ry close to being hit by the aileron control horn when folded.- - ------------------------- ------------------- Bill Sullivan ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: fuel line?
From: "N111KX (Kip)" <n111kx(at)mindspring.com>
Date: Sep 16, 2008
I have had great success with automotive "fuel injection" tubing from NAPA or similar. It's black, very stiff and durable. Sorry that I don't have a part#. I use metal hose clamps also. Never had a fuel problem in 8 years. Kip -------- Kip Firestar II, N111KX Waiex, N111YX Quickie 1, N111QX Atlanta Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4558#204558 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb List Re: fuel line
Date: Sep 16, 2008
I am fascinated by all the discussion about fitting an extra fuel pump. Has anyone actually checked to see what percentage of fuel pumps have failed. It seems to me, ignorant as I am, that all the complications of setting up a back up pump merely increase the risk of something going wrong. What about doubling up on the control cables? If they part you really do have trouble. Whatever happened to simple, slow, cheap flying.. puzzled Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: fuel line?
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 16, 2008
Dana wrote: > > > but one can get a blockage from many > things... including moisture in the paper filter shown in your pictures. > > -Dana > -- > This is true, paper filter elements can be very problematic with the ethanol now found in most gasoline. I will take some pictures of the second version of my fuel system and post them soon. The paper fuel filter has been replaced with a Challenger Stainless Steel 10 micron fuel filter from Aircraft Spruce. It was expensive, but after reading the EAA's statistics on the percentage of experimental aircraft failures caused by bad fuel system design, I decided it was worth the 130 dollars for the filter. The stainless steel filter is designed to be taken apart and cleaned, so it should be a one time purchase. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4590#204590 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Kolb List Re: fuel line
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 16, 2008
pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com wrote: > I am fascinated by all the discussion about fitting an extra fuel pump. > > Has anyone actually checked to see what percentage of fuel pumps have failed. It seems to me, ignorant as I am, that all the complications of setting up a back up pump merely increase the risk of something going wrong. > > What about doubling up on the control cables? If they part you really do have trouble. Whatever happened to simple, slow, cheap flying.. > > puzzled > > Pat > >From most field experience with the Rotax motors that I'm aware of, fuel pump failures are very rare compared to other things that tend to go wrong. Even the pneumatic pumps for the 2-strokes very rarely give problems. I've never felt the need for a backup electric pump in any of my planes because of this. I try to keep the system as simple as possible so that the backup pump isn't needed for fuel flow reasons. My experience with engine trouble and engine outs is generally that you don't want to try to debug a quit or sagging engine in the air anyway. I muchly prefer to get the plane on the ground first and ignore that until I'm down. By the time I could diagnose that it was actually the fuel pump that's bad the prop would likely be already stopped anyway and continued fiddling would only hinder my chances at a good emergency out-landing. That's just what works for me and I'm not suggesting that for anyone else. I just don't like long checklists when trouble with the fan starts; at that point I'd rather make the landing field choice and start setting up the approach rather than going through some long procedure. The engine out I had in my trike was the very best lesson on this for me that I ever had in my flying career. So, MHO is that the addition of the backup electric pump where it's not needed for fuel flow reasons isn't worth the extra complexity, wiring etc. that it adds, due to the very low chances it'd ever be needed with the Rotax pumps. Again only MHO and not a suggestion for others, LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4594#204594 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 16, 2008
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: fuel line
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:17:15 +0100 > I am fascinated by all the discussion about fitting an extra fuel pump. Has anyone actually checked to see what percentage of fuel pumps have failed. It seems to me, ignorant as I am, that all the complications of setting up a back up pump merely increase the risk of something going wrong. What about doubling up on the control cables? If they part you really do have trouble. Whatever happened to simple, slow, cheap flying.. > Pat, I believe it has to do with "comfort level". If you have the same two of anything, the cost and weight and the chance of a failure for that item doubles. I have two retired Air Force brother-in-laws, who believe it is dangerous to fly with anything less than four engines and a redundancy of at least two on every other support system. As far as the fuel pump is concerned, I test it on each take off. If the engine will not come up to max rpm, I will change it out. I use clear line from the pump to the carburetor, so I can see that the carburetor float bowl is completely primed by the fuel bulb pump. I remove the float bowl periodically to check for debris and water. So far, I have never found any. Once a year I remove the tank and remove debris from the bottom. I may find a dime's volume of water in the tank. I purge my four 2.5 gallon fuel transport and oil mixing tanks twice a year. This has been a simple, light weight, and reliable fuel system for the FireFly. I do not consider it to be substandard. If I could figure out how to select the correct pitch wood propeller on the first pick, I would be flying with a wood propeller. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
Date: Sep 16, 2008
> This is true, paper filter elements can be very problematic with the ethanol now found in most gasoline. I will take some pictures of the second version of my fuel system and post them soon. The paper fuel filter has been replaced with a Challenger Stainless Steel 10 micron fuel filter from Aircraft Spruce. It was expensive, but after reading the EAA's statistics on the percentage of experimental aircraft failures caused by bad fuel system design, I decided it was worth the 130 dollars for the filter. The stainless steel filter is designed to be taken apart and cleaned, so it should be a one time purchase. > > Mike Mike B: I don't like paper element fuel filters, primarily because we had so much trouble with them and moisture back in the 1980's. More than 20 years ago, the industry has done a good job of improving the composition of paper elements in fuel filters. I haven't heard of this problem in many years. There is nothing wrong with the fuel systems we have been using in our ultralights and light planes for the 24 years that I have been playing with these things. Mikuni has a good reputation of "pulling" fuel from low tanks to feed the two strokes. Pierberg fuel pumps used on 912 series engines have been around for decades. Very popular on German autos, Opel, Taunas, and others. It is also a good puller. I can account for more than 14,000 gallons of fuel being pulled through my Pierbergs, up 14,500 feet above sea level, in my mkIII alone. I don't think we need to reinvent our fuel systems, but we do need to insure they are serviceable, whether we use clear plastic or expensive aviation type fuel line. I for one would not spend 130.00 for a fuel filter, when the purolator filter I have been using since 1984, on all three of my airplanes, has done an excellent job. That's right. Nearly 5,000 operational hours, from the 35 hp Cuyuna to the 100 hp 912ULS, this little filter has been doing its job. Have no idea how many nylon elements have gone through it, but it still works great, except for the first night it was installed on my Ultrastar. Either I over tightened the filter or had a bad glass cylinder, but the glass had broken during the night and my 6 gallons of mogas had drained out of the new 6 gallon tank. I made one modification to the filter, replaced the glass with the same size 7/8 X .058 6061T6 aluminum tube, never having that problem again. My good friend, John W, flew with the same filter and the glass cylinder with no problems. I have one on my Onan generator that has been in operation several thousand hours, with glass cylinder, and no problems. I am happy that you have updated your fuel system. I thought Bryan Milburn had done a pretty good job when he built your MKIIIx and installed the fuel system. However, I am sure your updates have improved your fuel system. Because you made these updates is not an indication that the rest of us out here in Kolb Land are wrong and need to follow suit............. I try not to tell others to do what I do. I like to tell and show them what I have done, then leave it up to them to make the decision what they want to do with their individual airplanes. I can assure you, in the past 24 years I have seen some aircraft applications and systems that were pretty frightening to me, but did not phase the folks that were flying the airplanes. I use what I use on my airplane because I have proven to myself that it works. There are times that my stuff failed, but I had to get out there and put a lot of time on the aircraft to test it. If I see something that will improve my airplane, an idea that someone else has come up with, I will make the change to my airplane if I feel that it is worthwhile and I can afford it. Got to go get my mkIII ready to fly to the Kolb Homecoming. Bruce Chaison is flying his MKIII from Louisiana to Wetumpka airport tomorrow, RON with James Tripp, then we three will fly to Labhart Field Thursday morning. Weather for the Homecoming looks great!!! See you all then............... john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steven Green" <Kolbdriver(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: C box bearings
Date: Sep 16, 2008
I am working from memory here soooo.. If it is SKF's numbering system, the 6000 series bearings are deep grove single row ball bearings. The C3 suffix means that the bearing has greater than normal internal radial clearance. The C3 IS important. Steven Green ----- Original Message ----- From: "herb" <herbgh(at)nctc.com> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 10:49 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: C box bearings > > Looking at the cps catalog...I see that the bearings for the c and e gear > boxes are the same 932-420 #23 is a 6205 C3 , 932-820 #14 is a 6305 > C3, 932-570 is a 6306 C3.. C3 means deep groove near as I can tell.. > All seals seem to be standard...off the shelf parts.. same for bearings.. > The difference being that they are about one fourth to one third as > expensive as CPS prices... > > That said...ran into a wall...with the roller bearing that supports the > back of the propeller shaft.. #11... $101 at CPS.. I can measure > it and come up with a fit..but would be nice to have the generic number if > someone on the list has it at hand... > > The oil seals run from 20 to 70 bucks...at CPS.. usually cost 3 or 4 > bucks each at a bearing house... Herb > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb List Re: fuel line
Date: Sep 16, 2008
> So, MHO is that the addition of the backup electric pump where it's not needed for fuel flow reasons isn't worth the extra complexity, wiring etc. that it adds, due to the very low chances it'd ever be needed with the Rotax pumps. > > Again only MHO and not a suggestion for others, > > LS Lucien: Boost pump doesn't really increase complexity of the system; a Facet pump, a little wire, and a switch. I put the boost pump in line. All the aircraft I have flown prior to getting into ultralights had boost pumps. It is automatic for me to flip the switch if I have an engine problem. Flipping the boost pump switch to the on position, or doing nothing if the switch is already on during take offs, landings, and low level flying. In addition to filling the float bowl prior to engine start, (eliminates the primer bulb), it is a little insurance to keep you going should your main engine pump fail. That's why I use mine... john h' mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 16, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb List Re: fuel line
At 08:39 AM 9/16/2008, william sullivan wrote: > On my 447 I had clear fuel line- Tygon- and a clear fuel filter. I > also questioned the bubbles in the line, and air in the filter. I had > tried bleeding the system, but always ended up with a visible flow of > bubbles. No apparent leaks or loose clamps. John H. advised ignoring > it, and it didn't seen to affect engine rpm. Possibly it was cavitation, > as the pulse pump was quite close to the engine, and the "lift" was over > a foot. Dana's last comment was that a pulse pump (Mikuni) could only be > located a limited distance away from the engine. How far can it be > located from the engine? Mine was bolted near the base of the engine, > and it was very close to being hit by the aileron control horn when folded. The Cuyuna manual says the pulse line should be 6 inches long or less. Also the pump should always be located above the pulse line connection on the crankcase, so that any fluid that gets into the pulse line can drain back down into the engine. There's always a bit of air visible in my clear glass fuel filter. When I start the engine, some bubbles move through the fuel line toward the pump, and a few more when I first go to full throttle. However, I never see them downstream of the pump, which is why I'm fairly certain they're minor cavitation, or dissolved air coming out of solution. The time I had the blockage in the [now removed] primer bulb, there were bubbles downstream of the pump as well, indicating that there _was_ a leak. -Dana -- Resist militant "normality" -- A mind is a terrible thing to erase. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 16, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb List Re: fuel line
At 10:17 AM 9/16/2008, pj.ladd wrote: >I am fascinated by all the discussion about fitting an extra fuel pump. > >Has anyone actually checked to see what percentage of fuel pumps have >failed. It seems to me, ignorant as I am, that all the complications of >setting up a back up pump merely increase the risk of something going wrong. > >What about doubling up on the control cables? If they part you really >do have trouble. Whatever happened to simple, slow, cheap flying.. The previous owner of my plane had an engine failure on his very first solo flight when a new (but sitting on the shelf for several years) Mikuni pump failed... the diaphragm was shot. (He got it down on the airport with only a broken landing gear). I'll simply replace or rebuild the pump every winter... it's cheap insurance. I also installed a fuel pressure gauge, not because I really need it, but because I had it laying around. The pressure is pretty constant, so if I see it drop I'll know it's time to poke around a bit. I'd be a lot less worried about control cables which are far stronger than they need to be, and which I can see during my preflight, than I am about hidden rubber flaps and diaphragm vibrating madly inside a fuel pump. -Dana -- Resist militant "normality" -- A mind is a terrible thing to erase. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb List Re: fuel line
Date: Sep 16, 2008
Dana: How does the little mikuni pump do, pressure-wise? Will is maintain 3 to 5 psi? Just curious. How do you inspect your control cables? Can't remember for sure, but do no think there are any fairleads on the US. I have some on my mkIII, and can not remember if there were any on the or iginal Firestar. Normal aging process.............. john h mkIII - With fresh Shell Rotella T Full Synthetic 5W40 diesel oil and a Fra m TG3614. Good for another 25 to 50 hours. I also installed a fuel pressure gauge, not because I really need it, bu t because I had it laying around. The pressure is pretty constant, so if I see it drop I'll know it's time to poke around a bit. I'd be a lot less worried about control cables which are far stronger tha n they need to be, and which I can see during my preflight, than I am about hidden rubber flaps and diaphragm vibrating madly inside a fuel pump. -Dana ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 16, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb List Re: fuel line
At 02:25 PM 9/16/2008, John Hauck wrote: >Dana: > >How does the little mikuni pump do, pressure-wise? > >Will is maintain 3 to 5 psi? 3-4 psi, a bit less at idle. Another good check (of the pump check valves as well as the float needle) is that it holds pressure for awhile after shutting down the engine. >How do you inspect your control cables? > >Can't remember for sure, but do no think there are any fairleads on the US... Just a visual check, with particular attention to where they go around the pulleys, the most likely point of failure, and look for any signs of slippage at the nicopress swages (highly unlikely if they were done correctly and survived this long). Security of clevis and cotter pins and turnbuckle wiring, and any unusual feel or noise when the controls are moved. No, no fairleads... the nice thing about the US is that everything is out in the open and visible; I even can (and do) peer down the inside of the boom tube before putting the gap seal on. -Dana -- What has four legs and an arm? A happy pit bull. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 16, 2008
From: curtis groote <cgroote1(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Firestar II kit in progress for sale
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 16, 2008
From: curtis groote <cgroote1(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Firestar II kit in progress for sale
I'm in various stages of the covering process, but too many other things go ing on to allow completion. Cost of materials so far $11,367.-- South D akota. cgroote1(at)yahoo.com---- 605-348-7170 =0A=0A=0A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <apilot(at)surewest.net>
Subject: N4201G
Date: Sep 16, 2008
Sorry to say that I must sell my Mark III Classic for $25,000. Will show it on Sept. 23rd at hanger #30, Susanville, CA airport. Call for details a/c 916, 722-9692 Vic Gibson (must sell hanger also) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 16, 2008
From: herb <herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Subject: Re: C box bearings
Steve The 6000 series seems to be made by everyone.. judging by the Google search.. I am not absolutely certain, but I think that the C box uses std 6000 series bearings with the C3 suffix... Herb At 11:07 AM 9/16/2008, you wrote: > > >I am working from memory here soooo.. If it is SKF's numbering >system, the 6000 series bearings are deep grove single row ball >bearings. The C3 suffix means that the bearing has greater than >normal internal radial clearance. The C3 IS important. > >Steven Green > >----- Original Message ----- From: "herb" <herbgh(at)nctc.com> >To: >Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 10:49 AM >Subject: Re: Kolb-List: C box bearings > > >> >>Looking at the cps catalog...I see that the bearings for the c and >>e gear boxes are the same 932-420 #23 is a 6205 >>C3 , 932-820 #14 is a 6305 C3, 932-570 is a 6306 C3.. C3 means >>deep groove near as I can tell.. All seals seem to be >>standard...off the shelf parts.. same for bearings.. The >>difference being that they are about one fourth to one third as >>expensive as CPS prices... >> >> That said...ran into a wall...with the roller bearing that >> supports the back of the propeller shaft.. #11... $101 at >> CPS.. I can measure it and come up with a fit..but would be >> nice to have the generic number if someone on the list has it at hand... >> >> The oil seals run from 20 to 70 bucks...at CPS.. usually cost 3 >> or 4 bucks each at a bearing house... Herb >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: fuel line?
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 16, 2008
John Hauck wrote: > > > I try not to tell others to do what I do. I like to tell and show them what > I have done, then leave it up to them to make the decision what they want to > do with their individual airplanes. > > john h > mkIII John, Most of the time I am smart enough to do what you do without being told [Wink] When I have a question, or need to see the best way to do something on a Kolb, the first thing I do is pull up all the pictures I have taken of you plane. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4686#204686 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Mark III performance
From: "clrprop" <ktony(at)windstream.net>
Date: Sep 16, 2008
Could someone post the perfomance data for the Mark III C / 582 ? I've e-mailed Kolb a couple of times but haven't heard back. Is there a pilot operating handbook for this plane? Thxs Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4687#204687 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb List Re: fuel line
Date: Sep 16, 2008
Dana: We used to have problems with the sides of the micarta pulleys wearing if t hey were a little out of alignment. Not a big problem, but something I lik ed to keep my eye on.\ john h mkIII Just a visual check, with particular attention to where they go around t he pulleys, -Dana ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: airspeed tubing
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 16, 2008
Started to take off with my son tonight...increased throttle, raised the tailwheel, glanced down to check the instruments and saw my airspeed indicator was not moving. So I decreased the throttle and managed to keep it on the ground. Luckily it was a hot evening and I wasn't by myself otherwise I would have been off the ground quicker than a wink and then would have had to land it w/o the ASI working. I have landed a Cessna w/o ASI but it is not fun. The strange thing is I went to go fly by myself this morning...all was clear- no ceiling and 7 miles visibility. I grabbed my gas cans, went to the station to fill them up and as soon as I headed back to the airport the airport was covered in thick fog and had a 400 foot ceiling. Just 10 minutes probably had passed. So I didn't get to fly by myself this morning...good thing! After my son and I got out of the plane I looked inside the very front of the nosecone and saw that the airspeed tubing was cut right in two. It is a thick plastic tubing...I don't know what to replace it with. -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4699#204699 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: airspeed tubing
Date: Sep 16, 2008
Cut in two? vandalism? Any plastic tube that is flexible will do. Neither the pitot nor the static endure any real pressure. All my tubing is from a roll of HVAC black poly used by industrial building mechs. Try ACE hardware or a heating/cooling supply if you don't care to wait for an aviation supplier. BB On 16, Sep 2008, at 9:58 PM, cristalclear13 wrote: > > > Started to take off with my son tonight...increased throttle, > raised the tailwheel, glanced down to check the instruments and saw > my airspeed indicator was not moving. So I decreased the throttle > and managed to keep it on the ground. Luckily it was a hot evening > and I wasn't by myself otherwise I would have been off the ground > quicker than a wink and then would have had to land it w/o the ASI > working. I have landed a Cessna w/o ASI but it is not fun. > > The strange thing is I went to go fly by myself this morning...all > was clear- no ceiling and 7 miles visibility. I grabbed my gas > cans, went to the station to fill them up and as soon as I headed > back to the airport the airport was covered in thick fog and had a > 400 foot ceiling. Just 10 minutes probably had passed. So I > didn't get to fly by myself this morning...good thing! > > After my son and I got out of the plane I looked inside the very > front of the nosecone and saw that the airspeed tubing was cut > right in two. It is a thick plastic tubing...I don't know what to > replace it with. > > -------- > Cristal Waters > Mark II Twinstar > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4699#204699 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DAquaNut(at)aol.com
Date: Sep 17, 2008
Subject: Re: Ike report
Well, I survived the storm along with the Firefly. Been cutting trees for 3 days. No major damage to the property. No damage to the Firefly, at all. The hangar that Jimmy was in ,before he moved His Firestar, was only 4 feet away from my hangar! I am typing using power from my trusty Honda generator. Dont expect power to be on before we leave for Kentucky. If I can get packed and to the airport, and everything secured here My wife and I should be up there , Thurs. eve or Fri. morn. God willing. Ed ( in wind altered Houston) P S Guess it was my turn Beauford **************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com. (http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: airspeed tubing
Date: Sep 17, 2008
saw my airspeed indicator was not moving. >> Hi Cristal, replace it with any tube you like. It will work. I had my ASI gradually fail on the climb out once. Climbing at 55 and then the needle began to fall back. It is automatic to lower the nose in such a case and as the ASI indicated slower and slower so I kept pushing the stick forward until I found myself with the nose well below the horizon and the speed still falling. Once I had picked up the horizon of course I realised what was wrong and ignored the ASI until I had landed. Inspection found that a spider had got well up the pitot and when I took off the speed pushed it back into the right angle bend I had in the tube, and blocked it completely. Always put a boot on the exposed pitot now. Unless your plastic tube is in a very exposed place it seems unlikely that someone woul;d have cut it unless they really don`t like you. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: help with wiring
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Sep 17, 2008
Since i got my plane home I have been doing some work on it to get it like I want it. Anyway I ran into a strange situation yesterday. I disconnected the ground leads from the battery a few days ago and yesterday when I turned on the key to me amazement the hour meter started running/ clicking. After this I took my volt meter and stuck the ground lead to the airframe and the positive to the positive side of the battery and got 12 volts. [Question] This has me confused. Then I disconnected the positive side of the battery and tried the key again. This time the hour meter did not run. Then I took my tester and stuck the positive lead to each of the positive wires. One wire leading to the blue box the voltage regulator consistently read 2.5 volts. So tell me how in the world can the hour meter run and the volt meter read 12 volts with the ground side of the battery is completed disconnected from everything? I did touch the fuel pump lead to the positive side of the battery and the ground to the frame and it would not run or arc so I am guessing the engine would not turn over, however the 2.5 volts and the 12 volt readings have me confused. Any ideas? I didn't try the starter since the plane was folded up [Rolling Eyes] Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4750#204750 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: airspeed tubing
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 17, 2008
slyck(at)frontiernet.net wrote: > Cut in two? vandalism? > I suppose I used the wrong word "cut", but it seems strange to use "broke" with plastic. I'm not indicating it was vandalism because I keep it locked up. I haven't seen many plastic tubes break in half except when you bend them good and they've been out in the sun. The man who had the plane before me had it under a shelter. I've kept it hangered. I don't know about before the previous owner...it's had several. My tube was just a straight line from the ASI to the pitot tube. But the plastic was yellow and felt old so perhaps it had a weak spot and the vibrations of the plane made it weak. Also I had JBWelded my pitot tube to the front of my nosecone because it kept sliding in and out of the hole a little. Perhaps that put a little stress on the old plastic tube as well. Now I wish I hadn't welded it...will make it a little more challenging to fix. The break is very close to the very front of the nosecone (where my pitot tube sticks out the very tip/front). I didn't know if there was a special size of tube to replace it or if it went by ASI manufacturer specs or if there was something from aircraft spruce maybe someone else had ordered and used. But if you guys say I can use anything, then that's good. Actually my son had the idea to duct tape it. I did try that and it worked for a flight around the pattern but I don't know if I want to keep it that way. :) -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4751#204751 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: help with wiring
Date: Sep 17, 2008
> So tell me how in the world can the hour meter run and the volt meter read 12 volts with the ground side of the battery is completed disconnected from everything? I did touch the fuel pump lead to the positive side of the battery and the ground to the frame and it would not run or arc so I am guessing the engine would not turn over, however the 2.5 volts and the 12 volt readings have me confused. > > Any ideas? Grant R: If you have a large capacitor wired into the 12DVC side of the reg/rec, it will act as a battery for a very short period of time, enough to operate the hour meter and show some voltage indications. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 17, 2008
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Kolb List: airspeed tubing
- Cristal---I don't now exactly what kind of plastic tubing you have, but some of the plastic air lines used on trucks would break just like dry spaghetti when they got old.- Somebody said the plastic would "dry out" with age.- Inside the nose cone, somebody's toe could have touched it. - ------------------------- --------------------- Bill Sulliv an - ------------------------- ---------------------- - - ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 17, 2008
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Kolb List: help with wiring
- Grant- do you have a radio or GPS with a back-up battery?- Could be g etting feedback from there. - ------------------------- ---------------- Bill Sullivan ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 17, 2008
From: herb <herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Subject: Re: help with wiring
second battery somewhere or your charger is hooked up...? Herb At 07:41 AM 9/17/2008, you wrote: > >Since i got my plane home I have been doing some work on it to get >it like I want it. Anyway I ran into a strange situation yesterday. >I disconnected the ground leads from the battery a few days ago and >yesterday when I turned on the key to me amazement the hour meter >started running/ clicking. After this I took my volt meter and >stuck the ground lead to the airframe and the positive to the >positive side of the battery and got 12 volts. [Question] This >has me confused. Then I disconnected the positive side of the >battery and tried the key again. This time the hour meter did not >run. Then I took my tester and stuck the positive lead to each of >the positive wires. One wire leading to the blue box the voltage >regulator consistently read 2.5 volts. > >So tell me how in the world can the hour meter run and the volt >meter read 12 volts with the ground side of the battery is completed >disconnected from everything? I did touch the fuel pump lead to the >positive side of the battery and the ground to the frame and it >would not run or arc so I am guessing the engine would not turn >over, however the 2.5 volts and the 12 volt readings have me confused. > >Any ideas? > >I didn't try the starter since the plane was folded up [Rolling Eyes] > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4750#204750 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: help with wiring
From: "George Alexander" <gtalexander(at)att.net>
Date: Sep 17, 2008
grantr wrote: > > > > ---- SNIP ---- > > So tell me how in the world can the hour meter run and the volt meter read 12 volts with the ground side of the battery is completed disconnected from everything? I did touch the fuel pump lead to the positive side of the battery and the ground to the frame and it would not run or arc so I am guessing the engine would not turn over, however the 2.5 volts and the 12 volt readings have me confused. > > Any ideas? > > Grant: Try disconnecting the Pos (+) side of the rect/reg (blue box? sounds like a Key West) and see if the hour meter continues to run. There is a small, residual voltage that takes some time to drain off on the output circuitry of the rect/reg. (You may have to wait until you run the engine before you try this one since that residual voltage may have drained off.) Whatever the source, it doesn't take much to click the hour meter over. I added a relay so that the hour meter will not run unless the engine is powering the rect/reg. Your other question about the VM reading 12V with the ground side of the battery disconnected.... either got to be another source for the 12V or a ground circuit that you haven't discovered yet. My $.02 worth...... -------- George Alexander FS II R503 N709FS http://gtalexander.home.att.net Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4773#204773 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: airspeed tubing
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 17, 2008
cristalclear13 wrote: > > Actually my son had the idea to duct tape it. I did try that and it worked for a flight around the pattern but I don't know if I want to keep it that way. :) > Hahaha, I like that, he must have really wanted to go flying with you ! Be careful though, once he learns how to fly, you will have to fight him over who gets to use plane ! Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4776#204776 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: airspeed tubing
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 17, 2008
JetPilot wrote: > > cristalclear13 wrote: > > > > Actually my son had the idea to duct tape it. I did try that and it worked for a flight around the pattern but I don't know if I want to keep it that way. :) > > > > > Hahaha, I like that, he must have really wanted to go flying with you ! Be careful though, once he learns how to fly, you will have to fight him over who gets to use plane ! > > Mike Actually he sat that one out Mike. I do any "test" flights by myself. He knows how much I LOVE to fly and does what he can to make things work out for me. -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4789#204789 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: fuel line?
Date: Sep 17, 2008
From: "Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL" <Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland.af.mil>
"JetPilot" wrote: << The paper fuel filter has been replaced with a Challenger Stainless Steel 10 micron fuel filter from Aircraft Spruce. It was expensive, ... 130 dollars for the filter. The stainless steel filter is designed to be taken apart and cleaned, so it should be a one time purchase. Mike >> Mike, and Kolbers - Another (less expensive) option to the paper element filter are the in-line clear glass "micro screen" cartridge filters, available at most auto parts stores. You've heard them recommended by various Kolbers more than once over the past several years. Purolator and Mr Gasket make these types of filters; I'm sure there are others. They're usually under 15 dollars. The screens are replaceable - you just toss the old one. Because they're glass, you can see the junk accumulating on the screen inside, and change it when necessary. I do this every annual. At annual, I also check and replace the rubber o-rings on the filter (there are 2). Easy, cheap, and o-rings are always available. I remember Hauck telling us the story of how the glass on his Purolator filter broke once (John - I do not recall the details, did that happen in flight?), which prompted him to replace the glass tube with the same diameter, same length piece of alum tube. Works the same. Dennis Kirby Mark-3, 912ul NM ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 17, 2008
From: "Richard Girard" <aslsa.rng(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
Dennis, all, I have recent experience with the filter you describe marketed under the Mr. Gasket brand name. In a word it was junk. As it happens, I had one of the originals, which proudly said made in the USA cast into one of the end pieces, to compare it to (ran it on my Harley until I switched from the S & S carb to the SU, but that's another story). The difference between the two is that the center piece on the original was round and the filter fit on it snugly so that it could take a bit of compression and allow the filter element to seal against the ends without distortion. The center section also had machined threads that were dead square to it and of a fit that the ends threaded on smoothly and enabled the o-ring seal in each end to do as it was intended. The barbed ends for the fuel lines were cast into the ends and then machined for a good seal on the fuel line. Of course that meant you had to purchase the proper filter for the size fuel line you were using. On the Mr. Gasket version (made proudly in the land where they put melamine in baby formula so they can kill their children for a few cents profit, but that truly is another story) the center is a flat casting of pot metal made so poorly that the threads were misaligned side to side (the parting line of the casting ran right down the middle) so that in order to actually function as threads they are so loose as to be worthless and the misalignment causes the ends to hold the glass barrel so that one side of the o-ring didn't even touch the barrel. If the ends were screwed down enough to stop it from leaking the o-ring was chewed up by the parting line inside the cap. The threads on the center, being only an 1/8" (~3mm) thick got distorted furthering the problem of their being too poor a fit to start with. When the ends were screwed down enough to make a sort of seal the ends were visibly out of square and the filter was buckled on one side. The end caps are threaded and several sizes of plastic barb fittings are supplied so it's a one filter fits all (1/4, 5/16, and 3/8) common fuel lines. The problem here was that there was so much chrome buildup on the first two threads on the cap that they stripped the plastic fittings as you threaded them in. Regular brass barbed fittings would not thread in at all. My suggestion would be that if you are buying on of these cheap knock off filters you get it at the local auto parts so you can ask the nice kid behind the counter if you can open it right there and inspect it for these types of defects. It won't solve your search for an alternative to paper fuel filters, but it will save you your $15 or a trip back to the store to return it. Just my experience, yours might be different. Rick do no archive On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL < Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland.af.mil> wrote: > Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland.af.mil> > > > "JetPilot" wrote: << The paper fuel filter has been replaced with > a Challenger Stainless Steel 10 micron fuel filter from Aircraft Spruce. > > It was expensive, ... 130 dollars for the filter. The stainless steel > filter is designed to be taken apart and cleaned, so it should be a one > time purchase. Mike >> > > > Mike, and Kolbers - > > Another (less expensive) option to the paper element filter are the > in-line clear glass "micro screen" cartridge filters, available at most > auto parts stores. You've heard them recommended by various Kolbers > more than once over the past several years. > > Purolator and Mr Gasket make these types of filters; I'm sure there are > others. They're usually under 15 dollars. The screens are replaceable > - you just toss the old one. Because they're glass, you can see the > junk accumulating on the screen inside, and change it when necessary. I > do this every annual. At annual, I also check and replace the rubber > o-rings on the filter (there are 2). Easy, cheap, and o-rings are > always available. > > I remember Hauck telling us the story of how the glass on his Purolator > filter broke once (John - I do not recall the details, did that happen > in flight?), which prompted him to replace the glass tube with the same > diameter, same length piece of alum tube. Works the same. > > > Dennis Kirby > Mark-3, 912ul > NM > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: 2008 Kolb Homecoming
Date: Sep 17, 2008
Hi Gang: Bruce Chaison made it into Wetumpka Airport this afternoon from Louisiana, his first cross country in his MKIII/912ULS. In the morning James Tripp, Bruce and I will take off for Labhart Field, KY, via Rome, GA, and Rockwood, TN, 342 sm. James T will be flying his FSII/503. Weather is supposed to be good on into next week. Hope the weather folks are correct. We look forward to meeting up with all the Kolb folks tomorrow. Take care, john h mkIII - 2,858.6 hours 912ULS - 290.1 hours ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
Date: Sep 17, 2008
Rick: Most of us bought a Purolator. Been using one for 24 years, and about 4,30 0 hours on my three Kolbs. Only problem I had with mine was a cracked glas s cylinder the first night it was on my Ultrastar. Replaced it with a piec e of aluminum tube, 7/8X.058, and have been filtering fuel every since, alm ost 18,000 gallons. ;-) Most all the popular parts houses have the Purolator fuel filter with glass cylinder and nylon mesh filter. One of the convenient thing about this filter is the small elements and "0" rings. They fit in my flight bag, taking up nearly no space. I can stick a couple replacements in there. Changing out requires a common screw driv er and a 1/2" or 13mm wrench. Pretty simple. I like it that way. john h mkIII Dennis, all, I have recent experience with the filter you describe market ed under the Mr. Gasket brand name. In a word it was junk. Just my experience, yours might be different. Rick ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: 447 tuning tips
From: "2danglico" <john.tempest(at)basf.com>
Date: Sep 18, 2008
Hi guys, I've got rid of the surging and stumbling at part throttle I was having. Adjusting the jet needle down one groove did the trick. It even brought my EGT more in line 900-1000. However my CHT's remained unchanged and are still showing below 300. The front one is closer to 250. This has me a little concerned but the engine seems to be running smooth and the plugs don't indicate a rich condition. I was wondering if dropping a size down on the main jet would be a good idea? Also I can only manage 6100 rpm at WOT. Is this just the prop pitch that dictates max engine speed or am I not making full power? Thanks for any advice. John Tempest Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4898#204898 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 18, 2008
From: "Richard Girard" <aslsa.rng(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: fuel line?
John, That was what I was trying to point out. Mine is 16 years old. These filters used to be well made and a good value, but what is sold today only looks like those under very casual inspection. If you look at them closely they reveal themselves to be junk. I wouldn't have one on my lawn mower. I thought it might be just that particular brand, but I have been unable to find one made like the one I bought years ago.I tried to find the Purolator version of this filter but it doesn't appear in their online catalog and I couldn't find it at any of the aftermarket suppliers either. Caveat emptor. Rick On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 9:48 PM, John Hauck wrote: > Rick: > > Most of us bought a Purolator. Been using one for 24 years, and about > 4,300 hours on my three Kolbs. Only problem I had with mine was a cracked > glass cylinder the first night it was on my Ultrastar. Replaced it with a > piece of aluminum tube, 7/8X.058, and have been filtering fuel every since, > almost 18,000 gallons. ;-) > > Most all the popular parts houses have the Purolator fuel filter with glass > cylinder and nylon mesh filter. > > One of the convenient thing about this filter is the small elements and "0" > rings. They fit in my flight bag, taking up nearly no space. I can stick a > couple replacements in there. Changing out requires a common screw driver > and a 1/2" or 13mm wrench. Pretty simple. I like it that way. > > john h > mkIII > > > Dennis, all, I have recent experience with the filter you describe marketed > under the Mr. Gasket brand name. In a word it was junk. > Just my experience, yours might be different. > > Rick > > > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 18, 2008
From: "Richard Girard" <aslsa.rng(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 447 tuning tips
John, Where are you getting the WOT reading, on the ground or in the air? Rick On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:22 AM, 2danglico wrote: > > Hi guys, > I've got rid of the surging and stumbling at part throttle I was having. > Adjusting the jet needle down one groove did the trick. It even brought my > EGT more in line 900-1000. However my CHT's remained unchanged and are still > showing below 300. The front one is closer to 250. This has me a little > concerned but the engine seems to be running smooth and the plugs don't > indicate a rich condition. I was wondering if dropping a size down on the > main jet would be a good idea? Also I can only manage 6100 rpm at WOT. Is > this just the prop pitch that dictates max engine speed or am I not making > full power? Thanks for any advice. John Tempest > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4898#204898 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 18, 2008
From: TheWanderingWench <thewanderingwench(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: LSA's and FAR 61.319
Do you have the telephone number of the FAA Light Sport Branch? I'm coming up on my biennial. I took my original checkride in my single seat taildragger. I know I can't take my biennial in it. So I have a number of questions: 1. Can I get a biennial from any CFI, or do I need to get it from a DPE? (I think that right now we can get a Sport Pilot biennial from any CFI - and that's what the FAA is trying to change in the current NPRM.) 2. Do I need to take the biennial in a taildragger? If I take it in a tricycle gear, it looks as though I can "pass" the biennial in a tricycle gear, but still will not be able to get a tricycle gear endorsement without instruction from one CFI (61.321a) and then getting a checkride from a different CFI (61.321b) and then applying to the FAA (61.321c) and when I get something back from them, going back to the proficiency checkride CFI and getting them to write a logbook endorsement. Thanks - Arty Trost Maxair Drifter Sandy, Oregon www.LessonsFromTheEdge.com "Life's a daring adventure or nothing" Helen Keller "I refuse to tip toe through life just to arrive safely at death." --- On Fri, 9/12/08, Richard Girard wrote: > From: Richard Girard <aslsa.rng(at)gmail.com> > Subject: Kolb-List: LSA's and FAR 61.319 > To: "kolb-list(at)matronics.com" > Date: Friday, September 12, 2008, 9:23 AM > Following the various posts on LSA endorsements and reading > 61.319, I was in > the dark about the meaning of "sets of aircraft" > so I called the FAA Light > Sport Branch this morning for clarification. They explained > it and referred > me to: > http://www.faa.gov/licenses_certificates/airmen_certification/sport_pilot/media/aircraft_sets.pdf > > So, here's the deal as explained by Tom, Rich and Joe > (yes, it took all > three to get the definitive answers). > If your endorsement is for a tricycle gear aircraft whose > maximum cruise > speed is under 87 knots you are good to go in ALL tricycle > gear LSA's, > qualifying certified aircraft, or E-AB's (again > provided they qualify to be > flown by a sport pilot) that has a max cruise speed under > 87 knots. This is > a set of aircraft. > Same goes for taildraggers. If you flew a Kolb with a max > cruise speed under > 87 knots to get your endorsement, you can fly a Firefly, > Firestar, Mk III, > whatever. It doesn't even have to be a Kolb, perish the > thought. As long as > it drags its tail and cruises at less than 87 knots > you're legal. > HOWEVER, a set of aircraft is a set of aircraft and they > are NOT backward > compatible. If your endorsement is for AP-5 (tricycle gear > max cruise > greater than 87 knots you are NOT good to go in AP-1 > (tricycle gear max > cruise less than 87 knots). The same goes AP-6 and AP-2. > This applies to Light Sport certificate holders ONLY. If > you're a PPL pilot > exercising the light sport privilege you need a tail > dragger endorsement > (unless you are grandfathered in) to fly a tail dragger and > that's it. > BFR's. They can't be done in a single place > aircraft and getting one in a > different set of aircraft does NOT equal an endorsement. If > you satisfied > your instructor that you qualified for the endorsement > he/she can give it, > but it's not automatic just because your BFR > requirement is met. > Hope this helps, and thanks for the discussion, it gives me > an article for > next month's newsletter. > > Rick ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 18, 2008
From: "Richard Girard" <aslsa.rng(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: LSA's and FAR 61.319
Arty, 1-405-954-6400. Rick On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:52 AM, TheWanderingWench < thewanderingwench(at)yahoo.com> wrote: > thewanderingwench(at)yahoo.com> > > Do you have the telephone number of the FAA Light Sport Branch? > > I'm coming up on my biennial. I took my original checkride in my single > seat taildragger. I know I can't take my biennial in it. So I have a > number of questions: > 1. Can I get a biennial from any CFI, or do I need to get it from a DPE? (I > think that right now we can get a Sport Pilot biennial from any CFI - and > that's what the FAA is trying to change in the current NPRM.) > 2. Do I need to take the biennial in a taildragger? If I take it in a > tricycle gear, it looks as though I can "pass" the biennial in a tricycle > gear, but still will not be able to get a tricycle gear endorsement without > instruction from one CFI (61.321a) and then getting a checkride from a > different CFI (61.321b) and then applying to the FAA (61.321c) and when I > get something back from them, going back to the proficiency checkride CFI > and getting them to write a logbook endorsement. > > Thanks - > > Arty Trost > Maxair Drifter > Sandy, Oregon > > > www.LessonsFromTheEdge.com > > "Life's a daring adventure or nothing" > Helen Keller > > "I refuse to tip toe through life just to arrive safely at death." > > > --- On Fri, 9/12/08, Richard Girard wrote: > > > From: Richard Girard <aslsa.rng(at)gmail.com> > > Subject: Kolb-List: LSA's and FAR 61.319 > > To: "kolb-list(at)matronics.com" > > Date: Friday, September 12, 2008, 9:23 AM > > Following the various posts on LSA endorsements and reading > > 61.319, I was in > > the dark about the meaning of "sets of aircraft" > > so I called the FAA Light > > Sport Branch this morning for clarification. They explained > > it and referred > > me to: > > > http://www.faa.gov/licenses_certificates/airmen_certification/sport_pilot/media/aircraft_sets.pdf > > > > So, here's the deal as explained by Tom, Rich and Joe > > (yes, it took all > > three to get the definitive answers). > > If your endorsement is for a tricycle gear aircraft whose > > maximum cruise > > speed is under 87 knots you are good to go in ALL tricycle > > gear LSA's, > > qualifying certified aircraft, or E-AB's (again > > provided they qualify to be > > flown by a sport pilot) that has a max cruise speed under > > 87 knots. This is > > a set of aircraft. > > Same goes for taildraggers. If you flew a Kolb with a max > > cruise speed under > > 87 knots to get your endorsement, you can fly a Firefly, > > Firestar, Mk III, > > whatever. It doesn't even have to be a Kolb, perish the > > thought. As long as > > it drags its tail and cruises at less than 87 knots > > you're legal. > > HOWEVER, a set of aircraft is a set of aircraft and they > > are NOT backward > > compatible. If your endorsement is for AP-5 (tricycle gear > > max cruise > > greater than 87 knots you are NOT good to go in AP-1 > > (tricycle gear max > > cruise less than 87 knots). The same goes AP-6 and AP-2. > > This applies to Light Sport certificate holders ONLY. If > > you're a PPL pilot > > exercising the light sport privilege you need a tail > > dragger endorsement > > (unless you are grandfathered in) to fly a tail dragger and > > that's it. > > BFR's. They can't be done in a single place > > aircraft and getting one in a > > different set of aircraft does NOT equal an endorsement. If > > you satisfied > > your instructor that you qualified for the endorsement > > he/she can give it, > > but it's not automatic just because your BFR > > requirement is met. > > Hope this helps, and thanks for the discussion, it gives me > > an article for > > next month's newsletter. > > > > Rick > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 18, 2008
From: gary aman <gaman(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: 447 tuning tips
Head temps reflect load more than anything else.Put your pitch where you want it ,for climb or cruise and adjust the needle to get the mixture/exhaust temps where you want them for the cruising speed/rpm at which you operate your engine. ----- Original Message ---- From: Richard Girard <aslsa.rng(at)gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 8:37:17 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: 447 tuning tips John, Where are you getting the WOT reading, on the ground or in the air? Rick On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:22 AM, 2danglico wrote: Hi guys, I've got rid of the surging and stumbling at part throttle I was having. Adjusting the jet needle down one groove did the trick. It even brought my EGT more in line 900-1000. However my CHT's remained unchanged and are still showing below 300. The front one is closer to 250. This has me a little concerned but the engine seems to be running smooth and the plugs don't indicate a rich condition. I was wondering if dropping a size down on the main jet would be a good idea? Also I can only manage 6100 rpm at WOT. Is this just the prop pitch that dictates max engine speed or am I not making full power? Thanks for any advice. John Tempest Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4898#204898 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 447 tuning tips
From: "2danglico" <john.tempest(at)basf.com>
Date: Sep 18, 2008
Rick, That's in the air. I've a wood prop so I can't adjust the pitch. -John Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4983#204983 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 447 tuning tips
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 18, 2008
If the engine runs correctly, and the plugs are the correct color, and the temperatures are where they should be then I would fly it. On the Trike that I fly we have the prop adjusted so that we get around 6100 RPM full power climbout maximum. Turning the prop faster just runs the piss out of the engine, makes the temperatures much harder to keep in limits, and only gives a very small amount more power, hardly enough to make a difference on the Trike. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4987#204987 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: fuel line?
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 18, 2008
I have one of those Purolator screen filters I got from Lockwood, I will have to look closely at it... I never used it after reading Johns experience with the glass. I could do the aluminum tube thing John talks about, thats just another project that I have on a very long list. The cheap junk coming from China is a big problem, not just in airplanes, but almost everything I buy now. I have lived in a third world country... A place where people try light bulbs at the stores before they pay for them to make sure they work. I bought an extension cord one day and when I plugged it in, there were sparks, it was a dead short. My wife was very surprised that I did not try it before I bought it. People in these third world countries don't care if a product fails the next day after you get it home, if they can save a few pennies in making it, they will make junk. Its to bad nothing is made in the USA any more, we may not be that competitive on the world market for a lot of different reasons, but we did make really good products that last ! Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4989#204989 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 18, 2008
From: "Richard Girard" <aslsa.rng(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 447 tuning tips
With all deference to the ideas of Mr. Aman, they are contrary to what Rotax recommends. Your prop is over pitched and you can chase jetting until the cows come home, it'll never come right until the prop is right for the engine.From Rotax Service Information document 3UL-89E (available from R.O.A.N.) Attention: If you wish to run your aircraft for noise reasons or other intentions constantly at reduced engine r.p.m. (limited throttle lever command or carburetor slide opening), you neverthelee have to chose the propeller by testing at the full throttle r.p.m. (fully open carburetor). >From Rotax Installation Manual pg 21-1 "....properly loaded with matched propeller for Max RPM (emphasis mine) The RPM you are getting is about right for climb out or max RPM when sitting still on the ground, but it is low for WOT. Do you have a friend with a prop you could borrow to test? Rick On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:34 PM, 2danglico wrote: > > Rick, > That's in the air. I've a wood prop so I can't adjust the pitch. -John > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 4983#204983 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: LSA's and FAR 61.319
From: "Ralph B" <ul15rhb(at)juno.com>
Date: Sep 19, 2008
I had my Flight Review last Wednesday in my Kolbra. The CFI knew very little about LSA's and Sport Pilot. I acted as PIC while he gave me instructions from the back seat. Not all CFI's are willing to take a ride in a light experimental aircraft. He had a lot of questions about the aircraft and the 912 engine. Normally the ground portion takes an hour and the flight an hour. He took 3.5 hours because he had questions and I let him fly the plane to get familiar with it. He pulled the power while I glided to a safe landing. I asked him if other GA pilots were able to make it to the field and land. He told me many needed a second try as they don't normally pull the power back while in the pattern. He was very thorough, more than my checkride two years ago. There is something to be said for all that ultralight experience. All went well and he signed my logbook. I'm good to go for another two years. Ralph -------- Ralph B Original Firestar 447 N91493 E-AB 21 years flying it Kolbra 912UL N20386 0 years flying it Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5058#205058 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 447 tuning tips
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 19, 2008
I read your quotes from the Rotax manual, but I do not see where it says anything about that your prop MUST turn the full 6800 RPM. I think you are misinterpreting what you are reading. Many props on the 447 do not turn 6800 RPM, that is quite normal. There is no requirement to turn the full 6800 RPM, and the temperatures that John was quoting were pretty good. The best indicator, which is the color of the plugs, is fine, I would not go chasing a problem that does not exist. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5064#205064 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: LSA's and FAR 61.319
From: "Thom Riddle" <riddletr(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 19, 2008
A proficiency check is a testing process and that is what the FAA is proposing to change in the new NPRM. That is not a Biennial Flight Review. By definition, a Biennial Flight Review is INSTRUCTION. The FARS specify a minimum of one hour of ground instruction and one hour of flight instruction to qualify as a BFR. There is no pass/fail and ANY CFI can provide this service. -------- Thom Riddle CFI-SP Power Plant Mechanic N221FA Allegro 2000 912UL N197BG FS1/447 -------------------- Scratch any cynic, he said, and youll find a disappointed idealist. George Carlin Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5101#205101 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 19, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: LSA's and FAR 61.319
At 01:55 PM 9/19/2008, Thom Riddle wrote: >By definition, a Biennial Flight Review is INSTRUCTION. The FARS specify a >minimum of one hour of ground instruction and one hour of flight >instruction to qualify as a BFR. There is no pass/fail... Well, yes and no. If you "fail" your logbook shows only dual instruction, not a completed BFR. -Dana -- This is an Uzi. This is an Uzi on full auto. Any questions? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: LSA's and FAR 61.319
Date: Sep 19, 2008
You mean if I smash that rattley old C-150 into oblivion I won't get my BFR signed off? Rats! BTW did anyone notice the C-162 test plane spiraled in? Pilot bailed out successfully. Maybe it shouldn't be held in a spin for more than one turn. I don't know about the rest of youze guyz but after one turn I'm usually satisfied. BB On 19, Sep 2008, at 5:25 PM, Dana Hague wrote: > > At 01:55 PM 9/19/2008, Thom Riddle wrote: >> By definition, a Biennial Flight Review is INSTRUCTION. The FARS >> specify a minimum of one hour of ground instruction and one hour >> of flight instruction to qualify as a BFR. There is no pass/fail... > > Well, yes and no. If you "fail" your logbook shows only dual > instruction, not a completed BFR. > > -Dana > > -- > This is an Uzi. This is an Uzi on full auto. Any questions? > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: LSA's and FAR 61.319
From: "Thom Riddle" <riddletr(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 19, 2008
Dana, In the spirit of friendly hair-splitting.... I say yes and no, to your yes and no. Yes, if the CFI is not satisfied with the pilot's performance after the MINIMUM one hour of ground and one hour of dual, s/he can state this and ask the pilot to continue with the instruction past these minimums or schedule another instructional session. The CFI is not required to endorse the pilot's logbook until he is satisfied, but he cannot stop the pilot from continuing to fly as long as his/her old BFR is still current. No, in the sense that an examiner in a proficiency test of check-ride (not a BFR) can "fail" the pilot and must send paperwork to the FAA stating this. Also, there are specific procedures for scheduling a re-take of a proficiency test or check-ride. Neither of these are required for a BFR. -------- Thom Riddle CFI-SP Power Plant Mechanic N1208P RANS S6S, Tailwheel, 912UL N197BG FS1/447 -------------------- Scratch any cynic, he said, and youll find a disappointed idealist. George Carlin Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5154#205154 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 19, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: LSA's and FAR 61.319
At 05:48 PM 9/19/2008, robert bean wrote: >BTW did anyone notice the C-162 test plane spiraled in? Pilot bailed >out successfully. >Maybe it shouldn't be held in a spin for more than one turn. >I don't know about the rest of youze guyz but after one turn I'm >usually satisfied. I always liked to do spins. Did 20 turns in a 150 once, then was hugely amused to read in Flying magazine the very next day that "what it does after 6 turns is unknown...". Could be they were doing aft C.G. tests in the 162. That could make a spin "unrecoverable". -Dana -- Everyone who lives dies; yet not everyone who dies, has lived. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 19, 2008
From: possums <possums(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: LSA's and FAR 61.319
At 06:33 PM 9/19/2008, you wrote: > >At 05:48 PM 9/19/2008, robert bean wrote: > >>BTW did anyone notice the C-162 test plane spiraled in? Pilot bailed >>out successfully. > >I always liked to do spins. Did 20 turns in a 150 once, then was >hugely amused to read in Flying magazine the very next day that >"what it does after 6 turns is unknown...". > >Could be they were doing aft C.G. tests in the 162. That could make >a spin "unrecoverable". > >-Dana The C-162 Skycatcher, made in China and still cost $110,000 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: LSA's and FAR 61.319
Date: Sep 19, 2008
maybe they'll rename it the turf snatcher On 19, Sep 2008, at 8:53 PM, possums wrote: > > At 06:33 PM 9/19/2008, you wrote: >> >> At 05:48 PM 9/19/2008, robert bean wrote: >> >>> BTW did anyone notice the C-162 test plane spiraled in? Pilot >>> bailed >>> out successfully. >> >> I always liked to do spins. Did 20 turns in a 150 once, then was >> hugely amused to read in Flying magazine the very next day that >> "what it does after 6 turns is unknown...". >> >> Could be they were doing aft C.G. tests in the 162. That could >> make a spin "unrecoverable". >> >> -Dana > > The C-162 Skycatcher, made in China and still cost $110,000 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 20, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: MKIII crash today
It's my sad duty to report a Kolb MKIII crash today in Connecticut. Engine failure on takeoff, perhaps 200-300' up, not clear whether the pilot was attempting to return to the airport or stalled due to the pitch-up and was trying to recover. Looked like he had turned about 45 from the runway centerline and went into the trees on about a 45 down line. Pilot (Bob Berrie whom some of you may know) and passenger are in stable condition, many broken bones and much pain but apparently not life threatening. They, another pilot on a GT400, and I were heading together to a fly-in in Rhode Island, I was still taxiing out and behind the hangars so I didn't see it happen. Looking at the wreckage, it's a miracle either of them survived. Our prayers are with them tonight. http://www.wfsb.com/news/17519674/detail.html#- or http://tinyurl.com/44s427 Surprisingly, the newscritters got it mostly right, except for the pilot's name and calling it an "ultralight". -Dana -- Lie ? Me ? Never! No, no, no, the truth is far too much fun! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: MKIII crash today
Date: Sep 20, 2008
That puts a damper on a day's outing. I hope their injuries are of the mendable variety. Departure failures are the worst. I don't have a lot of regard for the so-called departure stall routines used in testing procedures, mostly because you would rarely ever be in that extreme a position in real life. That struggle at full throttle in the old C-150 until it flips its ass over teakettle is bogus. Best wishes to your friends. BB On 20, Sep 2008, at 7:28 PM, Dana Hague wrote: > > It's my sad duty to report a Kolb MKIII crash today in > Connecticut. Engine failure on takeoff, perhaps 200-300' up, not > clear whether the pilot was attempting to return to the airport or > stalled due to the pitch-up and was trying to recover. Looked like > he had turned about 45 from the runway centerline and went into > the trees on about a 45 down line. Pilot (Bob Berrie whom some of > you may know) and passenger are in stable condition, many broken > bones and much pain but apparently not life threatening. They, > another pilot on a GT400, and I were heading together to a fly-in > in Rhode Island, I was still taxiing out and behind the hangars so > I didn't see it happen. Looking at the wreckage, it's a miracle > either of them survived. Our prayers are with them tonight. > > http://www.wfsb.com/news/17519674/detail.html#- or http:// > tinyurl.com/44s427 > > Surprisingly, the newscritters got it mostly right, except for the > pilot's name and calling it an "ultralight". > > -Dana > -- > Lie ? Me ? Never! No, no, no, the truth is far too much fun! > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 21, 2008
From: "Richard Girard" <aslsa.rng(at)gmail.com>
Subject: 447 tuning tips
Mike, John, all, I regret leaving out HP when I said the engine must reach full RPM. Look at the graphs in the operators manual and you see that the engine develops its peak HP at 6500 RPM and this is what must be achieved at WOT, not 6800 RPM as Mike interpreted my remarks. This is also reflected in SI 3UL - 89E. The graphs here are directed at various problems that occur when the prop is not matched to the engine so that it reaches "nominal RPM" at WOT.Back to the graphs in the Operation Manual. John says he is getting 6100 RPM WOT in level flight. I would guess he is seeing 5700 to 5800 RPM in climb. This represents an 8 to 10 per cent loss of horsepower. Why on earth would you want to tune for that? Sort of like running the engine with one arm tied behind its back :-} John, I've never had dealings with Ronnie Smith at South Mississippi Light Aircraft but he comes highly recommended by John H and others here on the list. Give him a call and describe your symptoms. I'll bet you a quarter he'll tell you your prop pitch is too steep. Rick ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: 447 Tuning
From: "2danglico" <john.tempest(at)basf.com>
Date: Sep 22, 2008
Hey Guys, I appreciate the feedback. I've put a couple hours on her since my last post and noticed these things. Climb out rpm is 5800-6000, level flight is 6200. Prop is 66 inches and 30 degrees pitch. CHT is 260 front, 290 rear. EGT's are good, after dropping my needle, moving around between 900 and 1100 degrees depending on throttle position. I never revisit WOT after climb out, so I was kinda in the dark as to my max RPM at level flight. I throttle back to 4750 RPM and this gives me 'bout 50mph AIS, my comfy cruise speed. I'll give R. Smith a call and see what his take is. My friends at the airpark say leave well enough alone. But I think it has to do with my Kolb embarrassing their planes on climb out. They all are running 503 DC/DI and none are showing CHT below 350. If my Rotax manual didn't say 330 to 425 degrees, I'd be a happy camper. Even if there's a little more power to be had at 6500 rpm. I feel my climb outs are safe. I can hold it at 50 mph and I'm getting up in a hurry. -John Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5466#205466 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: EGT?
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Sep 22, 2008
I just installed a new westach Dual egt gauge and one new sender. The plane originally had 1 EGT gauge. I am using the existing sender since the old gauge is a westach as well. Both( new and old) senders are working however I noticed after shutdown that one gauge in the dual egt continued to read the temp at shutdown and tapered off as the engine cooled and the other one stopped reading right after shutdown. Since these are non powered gauges is there something wrong? Also the new sender is longer than the old one and it's head is shaped a little different. Grant Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5477#205477 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: MKIII crash today
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Sep 22, 2008
I saw a news video and it showed the plane upside down at the base of a tree. Did they go in at the top of the tree and tumble through? What engine did they have? Very sad indeed. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5479#205479 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: MKIII crash today
At 09:07 AM 9/22/2008, grantr wrote: > >I saw a news video and it showed the plane upside down at the base of a >tree. Did they go in at the top of the tree and tumble through? > >What engine did they have? > >Very sad indeed. It looked they went in on a 45 degree angle from the treetop, then nosed over. Whether they initially hit the treetop at that angle or came in at a normal glide angle and then dropped after hitting the tree I can't say. Engine was [I think] a 912, or perhaps a 914. Reason for the failure unknown, possibly a fuel system problem. -Dana -- Friends help you move. *Real* friends help you move bodies. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2008
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: MKIII crash today
> >I saw a news video and it showed the plane upside down at the base of a tree. Did they go in at the top of the tree and tumble through? > >What engine did they have? > http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/NNumSQL.asp?NNumbertxt=350RB&cmndfind.x=0&cmndfind.y=0 Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: 100LL use in rotax 503?
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Sep 22, 2008
It seems lately ethanol free gas is becoming harder to find. The last 30 gallons I have run through my 503 contained 10% ethanol according to the pump sticker. I might be crazy but I swear I can tell the difference in smell between the regular and ethanol blended gas. Anyway I know rotax does not recommended ethanol at all over I think 5% and they do allow use of av gas some of the time. I have heard of some people using exclusively 100LL in 2 strokes with no problems. Then I have heard that the lead will flat spot the bearing and cause deposits in cylinder and foul the plugs more often. So far so good with the E fuel but I still don't like it. Is anyone using exclusively 100LL in a 2 stroke rotax? Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5554#205554 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: 100LL use in rotax 503?
Date: Sep 22, 2008
> I have heard of some people using exclusively 100LL in 2 strokes with no problems. Then I have heard that the lead will flat spot the bearing and cause deposits in cylinder and foul the plugs more often. > > So far so good with the E fuel but I still don't like it. > > Is anyone using exclusively 100LL in a 2 stroke rotax? Grant R: I used a lot of 100LL during my travels with old Firestar and point ign 447. This was in the 1980's. I doubt there would be any difference now as then. Hope 100LL doesn't flat spot bearings, because I burn an awful lot of it in my 912ULS loaded with bearings. I always ran my two strokes hard, as I do my 4 strokes. I cruised at 5,800 rpm, the recommended cruise power for all the current Rotax two strokes. Sometimes, when I got closer to home after a long trip, I'd push it on up to 6200 rpm and let it rip. I am a firm believer in running the engines as they were designed, not babying them, but keeping them blown out and clean. 4 to 5 thousand rpm hardly keeps a two stroke crankcase free from excess oil. My thoughts only, for what they are worth. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 100LL use in rotax 503?
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Sep 22, 2008
John, I don't have a problem babying my 503 on my Mk III she has to turn about 5700 to 6000 to cruise.:D Did the spark plug last as long with the 100LL. How about combustion deposits and carbon build up? Thanks Grant Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5566#205566 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: 100LL use in rotax 503?
Date: Sep 22, 2008
Grant R: Probably leaves less carbon deposits, but some lead deposits. Spark plugs are cheap. I would not skimp when it came to changing them out. Usually, you can pull the plugs, use a small pin knife blade and a piece of safety wire to clean the lead out of the plugs. I end up doing that occasionally on the 912ULS on long cross country flights. john h mkIII I don't have a problem babying my 503 on my Mk III she has to turn about 5700 to 6000 to cruise.:D > > Did the spark plug last as long with the 100LL. How about combustion > deposits and carbon build up? > > Thanks > > Grant ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: 2008 Kolb Homecoming
Date: Sep 22, 2008
Hi Gang: The 2008 Kolb Homecoming has come and gone. My, the years are flying by. Was great to see all my old friends again. Where else can you come together once a year, spend a weekend with folks you met at the Homecoming in previous years, have the same love of the same aircraft, eat enough for two people, go to bed early and get up when you want to, and not spend a dime, except for the money to get there and get back home. Bruce Chaison, James Tripp and I had a good flight to Labhart Field. Even though we had a headwind most of the way, we still had fun and got there in time for the BBQ put on by Bryan Millborn (sp). The "cake lady" had two scrumdiddlyumpscious cakes, just like last year. All the food was great, three meals a day. Entertainment was put on by my main man Travis Brown and his five string banjo. He was accompanied by Eddy and her feller, and Howard Brandon. We were also privileged to hear a little 9 year old girl sing a couple songs for us. The photos are: a. Three intrepid flyers waiting for weather at Gantt International Airport. b. James Tripp heading for the Kolb Homecoming. c. Approaching Wind Rock Mountain near Oak Ridge, TN. d. Wind Generators at Wind Rock. For a size comparison, check the yellow road grader left of the white building in the foreground. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: EGT?
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Sep 22, 2008
Maybe I didn't word that the best. The issue is I bought a new dual EGT gauge and one new sender. I am using the old sender on the pto side and the new one on the mag side. The new sender mag side reading continues to read say around 800 degrees and tapers off gradually over a few mins after engine shutdown. the other sender pto side basically tapers off quickly after engine shutdown. What is the gauge suppose to do normally? Slowly taper off or rather rapidly? The only think I could thing off that would cause this is the sender touching the exhaust pipe wall, however I am 95% sure thats not the case. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5592#205592 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 100LL use in rotax 503?
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Sep 22, 2008
Thanks John, I only head that from one person regarding 100LL flat spotting bearing. I have not seen that posted any where else. Looks like I am going leaded [Wink] Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5593#205593 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: 100LL use in rotax 503?
Not a reason to choose a fuel, but an interesting aside: When my friend's MKIII crashed this weekend, the DEP was on the scene because all the fuel leaked out of the plane into the ground, close to the river and to a well. He was quite concerned if it was leaded aviation fuel (it wasn't). Either way the pilot (or the pilot's insurance) will have to pay to have the soil dug up and disposed of. -Dana -- Sometimes you're the windshield, sometimes you're the bug. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: EGT probe location
According to the Cuyuna manual, the EGT probe should be 1.5" from the exhaust gasket for the #1 cylinder. However, mine is located (by a previous owner) at the intersection of the two pipes, about 6" from the gasket(s). What I'd like to know is how much does that affect the indicated temperatures? I've jetted to keep the full throttle EGT at or below 1200F (Cuyuna specifies 1200 as "best HP" and 1275 as max), and the plug color seems to confirm I've got it right. When I slightly close the throttle so the needle drops into the jet it rises slightly as I'm told it should, and it runs quite a bit cooler at cruise. CHT is fine too, around 300. Haven't had any engine problems except for the sudden stoppage a few months ago which I now attribute to a bad carb float needle. It's a basic sensor, in the EGT/tach 2" combo gauge. Relocating it is no big deal, but I'd rather not do it until I have the exhaust off for some other reason anyway. -Dana -- Sometimes you're the windshield, sometimes you're the bug. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2008
From: herb <herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Subject: Re: 100LL use in rotax 503?
If a bearing(ball or roller or needle) slides rather than rolls,,,then there can be irregular wear.. Herb At 06:56 PM 9/22/2008, you wrote: > >Thanks John, > >I only head that from one person regarding 100LL flat spotting >bearing. I have not seen that posted any where else. > >Looks like I am going leaded [Wink] > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5593#205593 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Baker" <jlbaker(at)msbit.net>
Date: Sep 22, 2008
Subject: Re: 100LL use in rotax 503?
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) X-SpamReason %%SpamReason%%: posted by: herb > > If a bearing(ball or roller or needle) slides rather than > rolls,,,then there can be irregular wear.. Herb Herb makes a good point...the same can be achieved by using too much oil...just how much is too much is uncertain...wherein the oil creates a hydrodynamic wedge that causes the ball/needle to slide instead of roll. Jim Baker 580.788.2779 Elmore City, OK ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steven Green" <Kolbdriver(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: 100LL use in rotax 503?
Date: Sep 22, 2008
This is good information on bearings, but doesn't rolling element skidding have more to do with minimum loading, bearing alignment, and lubricant viscosity than lead additive in the fuel? Maybe I am missing something, I usually do. Steven > > X-SpamReason %%SpamReason%%: > > posted by: herb >> >> If a bearing(ball or roller or needle) slides rather than >> rolls,,,then there can be irregular wear.. Herb > > Herb makes a good point...the same can be achieved by using too much > oil...just how much is too much is uncertain...wherein the oil > creates a hydrodynamic wedge that causes the ball/needle to slide > instead of roll. > > Jim Baker > 580.788.2779 > Elmore City, OK > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2008
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: EGT probe location
> >According to the Cuyuna manual, the EGT probe should be 1.5" from the >exhaust gasket for the #1 cylinder. However, mine is located (by a >previous owner) at the intersection of the two pipes, about 6" from the >gasket(s). What I'd like to know is how much does that affect the >indicated temperatures? Dana, I located a second EGT probe about six inches further along the pipe on the Victor 1+. This EGT always reads higher that the one that is installed closer to the engine. If the engine is running rich, the new EGT will read as much as 125 degrees higher. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: EGT probe location
At 10:26 PM 9/22/2008, Jack B. Hart wrote: >I located a second EGT probe about six inches further along the pipe on the >Victor 1+. This EGT always reads higher that the one that is installed >closer to the engine. If the engine is running rich, the new EGT will read >as much as 125 degrees higher. Makes sense, if fuel is still burning in the exhaust. How much higher does it read if it's _not_ running rich? -Dana -- In America, anyone can become president. That's one of the risks you take. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2008
From: possums <possums(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: 100LL use in rotax 503?
At 08:10 PM 9/22/2008, you wrote: > >Not a reason to choose a fuel, but an interesting aside: When my >friend's MKIII crashed this weekend, the DEP was on the scene >because all the fuel leaked out of the plane into the ground, close >to the river and to a well. He was quite concerned if it was leaded >aviation fuel (it wasn't). Either way the pilot (or the pilot's >insurance) will have to pay to have the soil dug up and disposed of. > >-Dana Yeah, when I sunk mine in the lake, the Corp of Engineers were more concerned about wether or not I might still have fuel in my tank that could leak, than just about anything else. Like every boat & jet ski sloshing back & forth all day long never spilled a drop. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2008
Subject: Re: EGT probe location
From: "Jim Dunn" <jim@tru-cast.com>
I had a Cuyuna 430R on a Quicksilver MX until 2 years ago. It had the EGT probe at the "Y" also. I relocated it to 2" from the piston, which may be 1.5" from the exhaust gasket. The temps came down quit a bit. I can't remember how much, but probably 150-200 deg F. The EGT also became much more responsive with power changes, choke, etc. If you haven't already, you definitely need to relocate it. Where it is is better than no EGT, but not by much. Jim D. N. Idaho > >According to the Cuyuna manual, the EGT probe should be 1.5" from the >exhaust gasket for the #1 cylinder. However, mine is located (by a >previous owner) at the intersection of the two pipes, about 6" from the >gasket(s). What I'd like to know is how much does that affect the >indicated temperatures? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ted Cowan" <tc1917(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: fuel additive
Date: Sep 23, 2008
Dont know how many know this but there is another answer to using low lead av gas. I have been reading (and using) about the new Sta-bil. There is a website for it at www.goldeagle.com/sta-bil/stabil_marine.htm. There are also some other brands you can find at marine outlets. I have used stabil forever to keep tractor and motorbikes, generators clean. This is formulated special for ethanol. I had it in my gas the whole time I was flying at the homecoming. It sets my mind at ease that I should not have to worry about corn squeezins in my tanks. Check it out and you may find one less thing to worry about. Oh, yeah, put in my rv too, one once per ten gals of gas and although I did not get better mileage, it did run a whole lot faster over the mountains, has an octane booster in it. I am sold. Had a funtastic time at homecoming. Great to see all you guys again, so many Kolbs, so little time. Was impressed with the Hurth on the MkC. Sounded and performed pretty much as a Rotax but I guess a bunch cheaper. Also was a fantastic plane. Red, White and Blue, my colors. My Kudos to all who worked the homecoming. We appreciate it. Ted Cowan, Alabama, Slingshot 912. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: 100LL use in rotax 503?
Date: Sep 23, 2008
disposed of? in other words they dig it up and move it to another spot..-problem solved?.... no transplanted maybe. How many of us have gotten a good mouthful of the old leaded stuff trying to prime a gas transfer? Me?, brain-damaged? nahhhhhh BB On 22, Sep 2008, at 9:40 PM, possums wrote: > At 08:10 PM 9/22/2008, you wrote: >> >> Not a reason to choose a fuel, but an interesting aside: When my >> friend's MKIII crashed this weekend, the DEP was on the scene >> because all the fuel leaked out of the plane into the ground, >> close to the river and to a well. He was quite concerned if it >> was leaded aviation fuel (it wasn't). Either way the pilot (or >> the pilot's insurance) will have to pay to have the soil dug up >> and disposed of. >> >> -Dana > > Yeah, when I sunk mine in the lake, the Corp of Engineers were more > concerned about > wether or not I might still have fuel in my tank that could leak, > than just about > anything else. Like every boat & jet ski sloshing back & forth all > day long never spilled a drop. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Mark III performance
From: "clrprop" <ktony(at)windstream.net>
Date: Sep 23, 2008
Can someone help me out a little here? Was there ever a POH for the MarkIII C? If so, is it possible to get a copy? Operating limitations? Performance data? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5679#205679 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2008
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: EGT probe location
> >Makes sense, if fuel is still burning in the exhaust. How much higher does >it read if it's _not_ running rich? > Dana, So far it will drop to with in 50 degrees on the Victor 1+. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Use of Facet fuel pumps as backup to pulse pump
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 23, 2008
Howard, The first part of your post is very good, there are many reasons to have a backup fuel pump, and your experience is just another example of many reasons as to how having backup electric fuel pump can prevent an engine failure. I strongly disagree with the second part of your post, an electric fuel pump should always be on for takeoff and landing. Takeoff is where the fuel demand is the highest, and when you are most likely to need an electric pump. The safest thing you can do is to keep your engine running on takeoff, and prevent a crash period, you will not have time to turn on your fuel pump or restart if your engine quits soon on takeoff. You increase the chances of a crash and the fire you are so worried about by not running a backup fuel pump on takeoff. You obviously saw the results of one accident where a freak set of circumstances made it much worse, but to base your actions on ONE ACCIDENT is bad judgment. Just because something happens ONCE does not make it PROBABLE. I flipped a coin once, and it landed on the edge, does that mean than in a coin toss I am always going to guess the coin will land on the edge ??? No, I will chose heads or tails... I will chose something that is likely, not something that has a one in a million chance just because I have seen it before. Your chances of a crash on takeoff and a post crash fire are increased by NOT running the fuel pump. It is important to look at what the biggest risks are rather than obsessing over what happened in one freak accident. In certified aircraft, the procedure is to have electric backup pumps running for takeoff and landing. The best solution to avoid a fire is to avoid a crash on takeoff, the best way to avoid a crash is to keep your engine running on takeoff. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5707#205707 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: More 2008 Kolb Homecoming Photos
Date: Sep 23, 2008
Morning Gang: Here are a few more photos. a. My camp. b. James Tripp and his camp. c. Steven Green and his camp. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: More Homecoming Photos
Date: Sep 23, 2008
a. Bruce Chesnut and Bruce Chaison with Bruce's MKIII. NOTE: When I refer to my airplane it is a MKIII. It is serial number M3-011. Fuselage was built in Feb 1991, some years before the Xtra was conceived by TNK. My MKIII is not a MKIII Classic, just a MKIII. I refer to the Xtra as a MKIIIX. ;-) b. Rip Welsh and a local Sling Shot that spent some time in my area before it was sold, several years ago. c. The Boss, Donnie Sizemore, busy as usual. That's the factory MKIIIX in the background. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: More Photos of Homecoming
Date: Sep 23, 2008
a. Happy campers. b. "This is how I would do it!" c. Larry Duncan trying to figure out how to get home to Mountain Home, Arkansas. Larry was one of the flyin campers. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: More Homecoming Photos
Date: Sep 23, 2008
a. Travis Brown and his band of renowned. b. A big coal fired power plant from 7,000 feet SW of Oak Ridge, TN. Cruising 80 mph, my ground speed was 102 mph. That makes me smile when I get over 100 mph ground speed. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: 100LL use in rotax 503?
Date: Sep 23, 2008
I believe the DEP requires that fuel-contaminated soil be BURNED -- like, cremated.>> Good grief. i can see the pointof all this if a tanker had crashed but for 5 gallons? Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jerry Jones <maderah2(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: More Homecoming Photos
Date: Sep 23, 2008
John, As always, thank you for your photos and other input. You do good by showing how much fun and adventure a person can enjoy flying light- sport type aircraft, Kolbs in particular--of course. Jerry Fresno On Sep 23, 2008, at 9:00 AM, John Hauck wrote: > a. Travis Brown and his band of renowned. > > b. A big coal fired power plant from 7,000 feet SW of Oak Ridge, > TN. Cruising 80 mph, my ground speed was 102 mph. That makes me > smile when I get over 100 mph ground speed. > > john h > mkIII < 1314 .JPG>< 1303 .JPG> ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Mark III performance
Date: Sep 23, 2008
Kolb doesn't publish a POH for any of their planes. This is very common with experimentals. Every plane is built differently so a POH would be meaningless. Sorry but that's the way it is. VNE is published as 100MPH for this plane but that is about it. Cruise speeds range from 50-80 MPH for this plane but this is all dependant on engines and accuracy/installation of the airspeed indicator. We weren't ignoring you we just don't have what you wanted. It is always best to tell us about yourself and your plane so that we can help you better. We are not in any way part of the Kolb factory. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIC ----- Original Message ----- From: "clrprop" <ktony(at)windstream.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 9:08 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Mark III performance > > Can someone help me out a little here? > Was there ever a POH for the MarkIII C? If so, is it possible to get a > copy? Operating limitations? Performance data? > Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5679#205679 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2008
From: "Bill Eslick" <wgeslick(at)gmail.com>
Subject: FS II Aileron balance weight
Can anybody tell me where I can get a replacement weight for my Firestar II aileron? I am not having much luck with the "new" Kolb factory. No answer. Seem to have donated this one to the countryside this morning. Bill E. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: FS II Aileron balance weight
Date: Sep 23, 2008
Hi Bill E: TNK has three employees. All three worked their butts off last week and Sa turday and Sunday to put on the Kolb Homecoming for us. I got a good idea they had the day off yesterday and today. I bet if you call Travis in the morning, he'll be there and get you a new counterbalance weight to UPS tomo rrow. BTW: They don't get overtime, and some of their hours have been cut. That hurts in todays environment. Take care, john h mkIII Can anybody tell me where I can get a replacement weight for my Fir estar II aileron? I am not having much luck with the "new" Kolb factory. No answer. Seem to have donated this one to the countryside this morning. Bill E. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: More Photos of Homecoming
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 23, 2008
John Hauck wrote: > a. Happy campers. > > b. "This is how I would do it!" > > c. Larry Duncan trying to figure out how to get home to Mountain Home, > Arkansas. Larry was one of the flyin campers. > > john h > mkIII Where there any Mark II's at the homecoming? -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5801#205801 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: airspeed tubing
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 23, 2008
Replaced my airspeed tube on Saturday with same tube as my fuel line and it worked just fine. It was a windy bumpy day here on Saturday...more than I care to fly in again. It has cooled off around here now but it's still pretty gusty. Maybe the wind will calm down right around dusk and I can go up and take a look around. I love heights! -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5805#205805 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2008
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Fw: Kolb List: re:FS II aileron balance weight
--- On Tue, 9/23/08, william sullivan wrote: From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net> Subject: Kolb List: re:FS II aileron balance weight Date: Tuesday, September 23, 2008, 9:40 PM - Bill- call them tomorrow morning.- I have had good luck with them.- They are probably playing catch-up after the Kolb fly-in. - ------------------------- ----------- Bill Sullivan ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: More Photos of Homecoming
Date: Sep 23, 2008
> Where there any Mark II's at the homecoming? > > -------- > Cristal Waters No MKII's, no US's, and no original FS's. They are getting to be antiques. There was a Kolb Flyer there though. Made of glass and powered with a 912ULS. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2008
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Kolb List: re: Homecoming
- John-- The Kolb Flyer was made of glass?- Are you referring to some kind of see- through Mylar?- I saw some photos of an ultralight bi-plane covered with it, but no Kolbs.- How feasable is it? - ------------------------- -------------- Bill Sullivan ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb List: re: Homecoming
Date: Sep 23, 2008
Composites!!! john h mkIII John- The Kolb Flyer was made of glass? Are you referring to so me kind of see- through Mylar? I saw some photos of an ultralight bi-plane covered with it, but no Kolbs. How feasable is it? Bill Sullivan ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb List: re: Homecoming
At 06:27 PM 9/23/2008, william sullivan wrote: > John- The Kolb Flyer was made of glass? Are you referring to some > kind of see- through Mylar? I saw some photos of an ultralight bi-plane > covered with it, but no Kolbs Glass... as in fiberglass... -Dana -- Never write device drivers on acid. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2008
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Kolb List re: Homecoming
- Okay, John and Dana, I give up.- Where would they put any form of gla ss on a Kolb Flyer?- The photos that I've seen don't show any pod or body . - ------------------------- ---------- Bill Sullivan ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Carlos" <grageda(at)innw.net>
Subject: Re: FS II Aileron balance weight
Date: Sep 23, 2008
Hi Bill, How goes the Firestar flying? Sorry to hear about your unintentional donation. The Kolb guys are really good folks to deal with.With the Kolb Homecoming and other stuff they may have needed a short break before getting back to work. How many hours have you put on your bird since you've got it? Us busy-bodies would like to know :-) Best Regards Carlos Grageda ----- Original Message ----- From: Bill Eslick To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 2:09 PM Subject: Kolb-List: FS II Aileron balance weight Can anybody tell me where I can get a replacement weight for my Firestar II aileron? I am not having much luck with the "new" Kolb factory. No answer. Seem to have donated this one to the countryside this morning. Bill E. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb List re: Homecoming
Date: Sep 23, 2008
Bill S: It is not Homer Kolb's old Flyer, but TNK's new composite Kolb Flyer SS, an LSA. john h mkIII Okay, John and Dana, I give up. Where would they put any form of glass o n a Kolb Flyer? The photos that I've seen don't show any pod or body. Bill Sullivan ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2008
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb List re: Homecoming
At 09:14 PM 9/23/2008, william sullivan wrote: > Okay, John and Dana, I give up. Where would they put any form of glass > on a Kolb Flyer? The photos that I've seen don't show any pod or body. They've resurrected the "Flyer" name for their new aircraft: http://www.kolbsport.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=61&Itemid=99 -Dana -- The most useful tool for dealing with management types is, of course, an automatic weapon. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: airspeed tubing
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 23, 2008
It was a beautiful evening for flying! Temperature is wonderful, sunset was gorgeous (it just goes down too fast!), air was smooth and just enough of a breeze to give a good lift. With the sun setting so early now I just had time for a couple trips around the pattern before the sun went down. But those few minutes are wonderful. -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5859#205859 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2008
From: chris davis <capedavis(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb List re: Homecoming
Bill, Attached please find a pic of a Kolb Flyer, I believe you may be unfa miliar with Kolbs new model- ;-) Chris=0A=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>=0ATo: kolb list <k olb-list(at)matronics.com>=0ASent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 9:14:13 PM=0ASu bject: Kolb-List: Kolb List re: Homecoming=0A=0A=0A- Okay, John and Dana, I give up.- Where would they put any form of glass on a Kolb Flyer?- T he photos that I've seen don't show any pod or body.=0A=0A----- ------------------------- =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D onics.com =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =0A=0A=0A ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: harvested peanut feild for a landing strip?
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Sep 23, 2008
Today the farmer picked the peanuts in the field surrounding my house so now I have a big 30ish acre field with 1200 to 1800 feet of length in any direction. Since the crop has been picked the field is smooth with rows of peanut hay however its real dry and dusty. I am sure many of you are familiar with peanut fields and how dusty things are during harvest. I would like to use it as my airstrip until the guy plows it in which will be a while probably 4 to 5 months however i am a bit concerned about the dusty conditions damaging my prop and sand blasting the tail section. Do any of you fly from fields like this? Should i be concerned with the dirt the prop is going to kick up? It would be so convenient to roll my plane out of the trailer and takeoff from my backyard. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5871#205871 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Mark III performance
From: "clrprop" <ktony(at)windstream.net>
Date: Sep 24, 2008
Thanks for the response Rick. I was looking for at least the performances originally published by Kolb for the MK-3. I understand the New Kolb may not want to give this info because of liability issues. Someone has e-mailed this info to me directly. This is my first plane and I'm just trying to comply with the regs for carrying an operating limitations in the plane. I took the ELSA repairman course this past weekend given by Mike Huffman and your name came up Cristal! He had nice things to say about your achievements! Keath Toney MK-3C /582 Lex. SC Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5900#205900 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Mark III performance
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 24, 2008
clrprop wrote: > I took the ELSA repairman course this past weekend given by Mike Huffman and your name came up Cristal! He had nice things to say about your achievements! > > Keath Toney > MK-3C /582 > Lex. SC That's humbling. Thanks Keath. My annual is coming up in November so now I have to check my class notes and materials and remember all that Mike taught me! I look forward to putting into practice what I learned. -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5902#205902 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: home-built
From: "clrprop" <ktony(at)windstream.net>
Date: Sep 24, 2008
This is off topic but thought you all might enjoy. This guy must have some amazing building skills. I'd love to see this plane in person... http://www.mlive.com/grpress/news/index.ssf/2008/09/holland_man_builds_world_war_i.html Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5908#205908 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Mark III performance
From: "clrprop" <ktony(at)windstream.net>
Date: Sep 24, 2008
Thanks Rick, I'll check with the FSDO. According to the class I just took, The weight & balance is actually not required. I expect to get pounced on about this, just relating what I was told. I was also told that if it is asked for and not given, I can expect to be cited for operating recklessly and something else I can't recall at the moment. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5925#205925 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: airspeed tubing
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Sep 24, 2008
Cristal, I don't know what the winds were in Waycross but the winds here on Saturday were 10- 14 mph mph with gust of 20mph. I was asked to fly down to a flyin in Moultrie however everyone backed out due to the wind. I sure as heck wasn't going to go up in that at least not yet. What were the winds there on Saturday? I hope to fly this weekend. I haven't flown since I got my license.. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5972#205972 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: harvested peanut field for a landing strip?
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 24, 2008
I don't know how many people ARE actually familiar with peanut fields on the forum. Not many from GA. Mostly pine trees and swamp where I live. Sounds like you might be having to do a lot of cleaning up if you fly in and out of there. Have you got a four-wheeler so you can drive on it and see how soft it is? Wouldn't want to get bogged down in the S. GA. sand (or red clay or whatever you have in your area). -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5976#205976 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: airspeed tubing
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 24, 2008
grantr wrote: > Cristal, > > I don't know what the winds were in Waycross but the winds here on Saturday were 10- 14 mph mph with gust of 20mph. I was asked to fly down to a flyin in Moultrie however everyone backed out due to the wind. > > I sure as heck wasn't going to go up in that at least not yet. What were the winds there on Saturday? > > I hope to fly this weekend. I haven't flown since I got my license.. Hi Grant. Hope you get to fly your Kolb soon. I kept checking the AWOS and it never said anything about gusts but after I got up in the air I knew it was. It ranged anywhere from 7-10 before I went up, but it was right down runway 5. -------- Cristal Waters Mark II Twinstar Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5977#205977 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: airspeed tubing
Date: Sep 24, 2008
It was a perfect day for a ride in a Kolb here in the northeast and, since these days are numbered, I pushed the crate out onto the LOOONG grass and fired it up. Gentle breeze right down the runway, dense air made it jump off in short order. I landed at a neighbor's strip, no heads popped out, turned around and left. I cruised over the local golf courses, noticed no shaking fists, spotted what looked like a J3 cub and chased after him. I was gaining on him until I felt a little twitter in the stick.... durn it, got to put those balancers on. Slowed back to sub warp 3 and went back home. Sure was pretty. BB MkIII, suzuki honorary member of ROODF (ancient acronym for royal order of dusty firewalls) On 24, Sep 2008, at 2:53 PM, cristalclear13 wrote: > > > > grantr wrote: >> Cristal, >> >> I don't know what the winds were in Waycross but the winds here on >> Saturday were 10- 14 mph mph with gust of 20mph. I was asked to >> fly down to a flyin in Moultrie however everyone backed out due to >> the wind. >> >> I sure as heck wasn't going to go up in that at least not yet. >> What were the winds there on Saturday? >> >> I hope to fly this weekend. I haven't flown since I got my license.. > > > Hi Grant. Hope you get to fly your Kolb soon. I kept checking the > AWOS and it never said anything about gusts but after I got up in > the air I knew it was. It ranged anywhere from 7-10 before I went > up, but it was right down runway 5. > > -------- > Cristal Waters > Mark II Twinstar > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5977#205977 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 24, 2008
From: "Richard Girard" <aslsa.rng(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Mark III performance
I put in a call to the Light Sport Branch to get FAR on this, but the only guy in the office was a flight test guy who didn't know right off. He did confirm that of the four items, only W & B is authored by the owner. I've just had it drilled into me that those four documents are the first thing to look for after opening the door. Perhaps it's not as strict on the experimental side of the aisle.Just curious, your Mk 3 is "N" numbered, isn't it? Rick On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:58 AM, clrprop wrote: > > Thanks Rick, > I'll check with the FSDO. > According to the class I just took, The weight & balance is actually not > required. I expect to get pounced on about this, just relating what I was > told. I was also told that if it is asked for and not given, I can expect to > be cited for operating recklessly and something else I can't recall at the > moment. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 5925#205925 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Mark III performance
From: "clrprop" <ktony(at)windstream.net>
Date: Sep 24, 2008
It's just a technicality. I think the second possible charge was failure to be in a condition for safe operation. Either way, if you don't have it, you're in deep doo-doo. My ignorance about the operating limitations shows my very limited knowledge about all of this but you've got to start somewhere right? That's why I'm here asking questions. My plane is N numbered but the circumstances surrounding how I got it are a bit unusual and I didn't get any kind of operating limitation sheet and a very basic w&b entry in the log. I ordered a copy of all records for it from the faa today. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 6050#206050 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2008
From: "Richard Girard" <aslsa.rng(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Mark III performance
No problem whatsoever. Let's start with the basics. Is your aircraft an Experimental Light Sport Aircraft (ELSA) or an Experimental Amateur Built Aircraft (EAB)? Do you have an experimental certificate for the airplane (pink piece of paper) and registration (known as the "hard card")? If you have an "N" number you should have the latter. If any of the other paper work is in doubt and If your aircraft is an ELSA, the hard card is the most important piece of paper to have and it must have been issued before 2-1-08. The reason for this is that the FAA granted an extension to the time limit for completing the registration process for an ELSA, provided the aircraft was registered before 2-1-08. If you have the registration all the other paperwork can be straightened out, if you don't there is still an option open to you, but it is extremely limiting to your flying. Rick On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:32 PM, clrprop wrote: > > It's just a technicality. I think the second possible charge was failure to > be in a condition for safe operation. Either way, if you don't have it, > you're in deep doo-doo. > My ignorance about the operating limitations shows my very limited > knowledge about all of this but you've got to start somewhere right? That's > why I'm here asking questions. > My plane is N numbered but the circumstances surrounding how I got it are a > bit unusual and I didn't get any kind of operating limitation sheet and a > very basic w&b entry in the log. > I ordered a copy of all records for it from the faa today. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 6050#206050 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Travis Brown (Kolb Aircraft)" <travis(at)tnkolbaircraft.com>
Subject: Re: FS II Aileron balance weight
Date: Sep 25, 2008
Hi everyone on this great list. We were here all day Monday working as usual. Monday was a regular work day for us. I would say we were outside taking down signs or we could have been on the phone when Bill tried to call. Below is my email address that I check often. travis(at)tnkolbaircraft.com We would like to thank everyone that attended our Homecoming this year.I was very pleased to see all you guys. Thank you so much for all the support and the friendship. Travis @ Kolb ----- Original Message ----- From: Carlos To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 9:20 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: FS II Aileron balance weight Hi Bill, How goes the Firestar flying? Sorry to hear about your unintentional donation. The Kolb guys are really good folks to deal with.With the Kolb Homecoming and other stuff they may have needed a short break before getting back to work. How many hours have you put on your bird since you've got it? Us busy-bodies would like to know :-) Best Regards Carlos Grageda ----- Original Message ----- From: Bill Eslick To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 2:09 PM Subject: Kolb-List: FS II Aileron balance weight Can anybody tell me where I can get a replacement weight for my Firestar II aileron? I am not having much luck with the "new" Kolb factory. No answer. Seem to have donated this one to the countryside this morning. Bill E. href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List">http://www.matronic s.com/Navigator?Kolb-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2008
From: "Bill Eslick" <wgeslick(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: FS II Aileron balance weight
Thanks to all for your replies. Didn't mean to sound disrespectful to your company, Travis! Didn't think about the fly-in, as I am so far away. Found a replacement locally for $1.00, so I am back in business. Bill E. On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Travis Brown (Kolb Aircraft) < travis(at)tnkolbaircraft.com> wrote: > Hi everyone on this great list. > We were here all day Monday working as usual. Monday was a regular work > day for us. > I would say we were outside taking down signs or we could have been on the > phone when Bill tried to call. > Below is my email address that I check often. > travis(at)tnkolbaircraft.com > We would like to thank everyone that attended our Homecoming this year.I > was very pleased to see all you guys. > Thank you so much for all the support and the friendship. > > Travis @ Kolb > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Mark III performance
From: "clrprop" <ktony(at)windstream.net>
Date: Sep 25, 2008
It's an ELSA. I've got the airworthiness card (pink) and am in the process of getting the registration transferred into my name. I just don't have operating limitations and need to do a new weight and balance. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 6125#206125 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Travis Brown (Kolb Aircraft)" <travis(at)tnkolbaircraft.com>
Subject: Re: FS II Aileron balance weight
Date: Sep 25, 2008
Bill No disrespect thought of at all sir.I am happy that you are back in the air. Please let me know if you need anything else in the future. You are important to us. Travis @ Kolb ----- Original Message ----- From: Bill Eslick To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 11:29 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: FS II Aileron balance weight Thanks to all for your replies. Didn't mean to sound disrespectful to your company, Travis! Didn't think about the fly-in, as I am so far away. Found a replacement locally for $1.00, so I am back in business. Bill E.


September 09, 2008 - September 25, 2008

Kolb-Archive.digest.vol-hs