Kolb-Archive.digest.vol-hx
December 19, 2008 - January 15, 2009
> times faster than cats. We would start a rat ranch adjacent to our
> cat farm for the rats. If we start with a million rats, we will
> have four rats per cat per day. The rats will be fed on the
> carcasses of the cats that we skin. This will give each rat a
> quarter of a cat. You can see by this that the business is a clean
> operation; self-supporting and really automatic throughout. The
> cats will eat the rats and the rats will eat the cats and we will
> get the skins
> Time is of the essence. Any hesitation on your part would be sheer
> disaster. Become a millionaire with us through knowledgeable
> investments.
>
> Send your cashier's check today to:
>
> Possums Inc.
> Kennesaw,
> Georgia, USA, Earth
>
>
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | russ kinne <russ(at)rkiphoto.com> |
Larry
That's a good way to set a snap-trap; must cover the pan with
newspaper or whatever to keep dirt out. I've put a trap under 2" of
cracked corn in the bottom of a deep galv. steel pail where they have
to jump down into it. Chained trap to handle. Never missed.
If you can see their runways, and there's a spot where they jump down
from one level to another, put a sheet of flypaper over their landing
spot.
Works, but you'll hear the worst blood-curdling screams ever! I've
watched rats climb up and over & around a trap set on a rafter
walkway; they may be smart but can't change direction in midair.
Tough time of year to finish an aircraft & then the wx wont let you
fly it!
Good luck, Merry Xmas,
Russ
On Dec 18, 2008, at 11:39 PM, Larry Cottrell wrote:
> Hi,
> A little advice from a "never failed yet" trapper. If the rats
> are licking the P Butter from the pan, there are two ways to handle
> it. Firstly it may not be rats, it may be mice that are not heavy
> enough to trip the trap. I would put lots of mouse traps around or
> a live trap that will take care of the little ones. The other thing
> you can do is to dig enough ground out to bury the trap. It would
> need to be by a wall where you could hang your bait high enough
> that the rat would have to stretch to reach the bait. You, I assume
> have a steel trap with a pan, if so tear off a small piece of cloth
> and lay over the trigger and pan, but not over the jaws. The idea
> is to keep the dirt from sifting under the pan and keep the trap
> from springing. Sift the dirt over the jaws just enough to conceal
> the trap, but the bare minimum necessary to hide it. What you are
> trying to do is to lure the rat into walking up to the wall and
> trying to reach the food that is dangling just out of reach, thus
> stepping into a trap that it does not know is there. Rats generally
> run along walls and natural corridors, so even if they don't smell
> the bait, (unlikely) they have a chance to step into the trap. If
> there are isolated points of entrance bury a trap there. If they
> run the walls, such as on a 2x4, place a trap there where they
> can't avoid it.
>
> Karen and I put the wings on the Firestar today, wind is howling,
> cold as a well diggers butt!
> Larry C
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | herb <herbgh(at)nctc.com> |
Looks as if "Rats" is now running third to Sea Foam and Vortex Generators...
Herb
At 09:57 AM 12/19/2008, you wrote:
>Larry
>That's a good way to set a snap-trap; must cover the pan with
>newspaper or whatever to keep dirt out. I've put a trap under 2" of
>cracked corn in the bottom of a deep galv. steel pail where they
>have to jump down into it. Chained trap to handle. Never missed.
>If you can see their runways, and there's a spot where they jump
>down from one level to another, put a sheet of flypaper over their
>landing spot.
>Works, but you'll hear the worst blood-curdling screams ever! I've
>watched rats climb up and over & around a trap set on a rafter
>walkway; they may be smart but can't change direction in midair.
>Tough time of year to finish an aircraft & then the wx wont let you fly it!
>Good luck, Merry Xmas,
>Russ
>
>
>On Dec 18, 2008, at 11:39 PM, Larry Cottrell wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>> A little advice from a "never failed yet" trapper. If the rats
>> are licking the P Butter from the pan, there are two ways to
>> handle it. Firstly it may not be rats, it may be mice that are not
>> heavy enough to trip the trap. I would put lots of mouse traps
>> around or a live trap that will take care of the little ones. The
>> other thing you can do is to dig enough ground out to bury the
>> trap. It would need to be by a wall where you could hang your bait
>> high enough that the rat would have to stretch to reach the bait.
>> You, I assume have a steel trap with a pan, if so tear off a small
>> piece of cloth and lay over the trigger and pan, but not over the
>> jaws. The idea is to keep the dirt from sifting under the pan and
>> keep the trap from springing. Sift the dirt over the jaws just
>> enough to conceal the trap, but the bare minimum necessary to hide
>> it. What you are trying to do is to lure the rat into walking up
>> to the wall and trying to reach the food that is dangling just out
>> of reach, thus stepping into a trap that it does not know is
>> there. Rats generally run along walls and natural corridors, so
>> even if they don't smell the bait, (unlikely) they have a chance
>> to step into the trap. If there are isolated points of entrance
>> bury a trap there. If they run the walls, such as on a 2x4, place
>> a trap there where they can't avoid it.
>>
>> Karen and I put the wings on the Firestar today, wind is
>> howling, cold as a well diggers butt!
>>Larry C
>>
>>
>>
>><http://www.matronics.com/contribution>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
>><http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com> |
Subject: | Re: Kolb Ultrastar: How to take-off |
Apparently Pat hadn't found it in various posts, >>
Hi,
I found it. I found it, and every single person on the list told me what I
was to old and stupid to remember.
Thanks everybody
Pat
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | gliderx5(at)comcast.net |
Subject: | MKII Dimensions for trailer |
Just an FYI for anyone looking at a MKII. I couldn't find these numbers when I
was looking at MKIIs. I wanted to know the folded dimensions so that I could consider
trailer options. Here are the folded dimensions of my MKII, with a 503
and 3 blade prop.
Overall length - 270"
Nose to back of wheels - 68"
Nose to prop - 114"
Outside wheel to outside wheel - 68"
wheel height - 14"
Prop height - 77"
Prop width (at top) - 59"
Width at wings - 28"
Tail height - 69"
Anyone else care to offer up other Kolb model dimensions?
P.S. I will have my enclosed trailer for sale in a month or so as I am outfitting
new one.
Malcolm Morrison
MKII
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | TheWanderingWench <thewanderingwench(at)yahoo.com> |
Subject: | From Lockwood Aviation re: oil and fuel |
Hi Kolbers,
This was posted today on the FlyChallenger list, and I thought it would be of interest.
Arty Trost
Sandy, Oregon
>From Richard on the FlyChallenger list:
I had an interesting talk with Dean from Lockwood Aviation today
about my concerns for the best products to put through the 503 DCDI.
I know it's been discussed at nausium, but time is drawing near for
the crank to start turning.
About oil:
As spoken about on the list many times, Shell has bought out Penzoil.
He stated that with the supply of Penzoil 2 stroke oil for air cooled
engines drawing near extinction, Shell will be coming out with an oil
especially formulated for the Rotax engine. Great news!
It has been blind bench tested with three other brands and has
prooved its worth. It will be out soon but he doesn't know exactly
when or what the new product name will be. Stay tuned.
Fuel:
When asked what he would burn in a 503 if he was the owner.
He stated that if your concerned about legalities and need to keep
your fuel at the Rotax reccomended 5% or less of Ethenol then he
would mix, as some on the list have mentioned, 50% 100LL avgas with
50% auto gas, 87 octane or higher that contains 10% of Ethenol.
On the other hand he stated that there have been no ENGINE problems
with running the auto gas with 10% ethenol.
The POSSIBLE problems coud include deterioration of O-rings, Poly
fuel tanks, fuel lines if not Ethenol rated, and other rubberized
parts.
He stated that he would keep a close eye on these parts if running
straight auto fuel.
Fuel filters:
He doesn't encourage the use of paper element fuel filters when
running Ethenol tainted fuel. Dean states that over time, I don't
know how long, the paper absorbes the water from the Ethenol and
swells, which can cause a fuel starvation problem.
He suggest using a metal mesh fuel filter of 60 to 70 microns. The
Rotax manual suggest a metal mesh also.
These are his suggestions and I know there are vairables, but I
thought I'd put it out there.
I'm going to change my paper fuel filter to the metal mesh but
haven't decided what fuel or fuel mix I may use. I'm on the fence but
leaning towards the auto fuel with a higher octane.
I'm not sure but I think the higher octane fuel burns more completely
and may leave less deposits. I'd like your suggestions on the octane
rating?
Richard
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | russ kinne <russ(at)rkiphoto.com> |
Possums
You didn't mention one big advantage to your plan (which is a great
one!) -- it gives worthwhile and enjoyable employment to the
thousands of yuppies who have blown out their olfactory lobes by
stuffing various items up their noses --
somehow I doubt anyone else would go near your ranch(es).
Where are all these 'Cat skinners' I hear about?
do not archive
On Dec 18, 2008, at 8:16 PM, possums wrote:
> At 10:08 AM 12/18/2008, you wrote:
>
>>
>> So far it is rats - 3 and me - 0. That have tripped the rat traps
>> three times, liked the peanut butter off clean, without getting
>> caught.
>
>
> Dear Investors,
> This is of the utmost urgency. The following is the "sleeper of all
> sleepers." Please send your check in the amount of $50,000
> immediately. We are limiting each participant to one unit. You can
> understand after reading this once in a lifetime offer.
>
> A group of us are considering investing in a large cat ranch near
> Hermosillo, Mexico. It is our purpose to start rather small with
> about one million cats. Each cat averages about twelve kittens a
> year; skins can be sold for about 20 cents for the white ones and
> up to 40 cents for the black. This will give us twelve million cat
> skins per year to sell at an average price of around 32 cents,
> making our gross revenue about $3 million a year. This really
> averages out to about $10,000 a day (excluding Sundays and
> holidays, of course).
>
> A good Mexican cat man can skin about 50 cats each day, at a wage
> of $13.15 a day. It will take 663 men to operate the ranch, so the
> net profit would be over $8,200 per day. Your $50,000 investment
> would be recovered in 6.1 days, which beats the stock market don't
> ya know.
>
> Now, the cats would be fed on rats exclusively. Rats multiply four
> times faster than cats. We would start a rat ranch adjacent to our
> cat farm for the rats. If we start with a million rats, we will
> have four rats per cat per day. The rats will be fed on the
> carcasses of the cats that we skin. This will give each rat a
> quarter of a cat. You can see by this that the business is a clean
> operation; self-supporting and really automatic throughout. The
> cats will eat the rats and the rats will eat the cats and we will
> get the skins
> Time is of the essence. Any hesitation on your part would be sheer
> disaster. Become a millionaire with us through knowledgeable
> investments.
>
> Send your cashier's check today to:
>
> Possums Inc.
> Kennesaw,
> Georgia, USA, Earth
>
>
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | possums <possums(at)bellsouth.net> |
At 05:17 PM 12/19/2008, you wrote:
>Possums
>Where are all these 'Cat skinners' I hear about?
>do not archive
Mexico? - maybe the UK ........ don't remember where I plagiarized it from.
Maybe we can use "Spanish Hamsters" instead of rats.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5aD6nWbvcI
>do not archive
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net> |
Subject: | Re: From Lockwood Aviation re: oil and fuel |
At 04:53 PM 12/19/2008, TheWanderingWench wrote:
>...I'm on the fence but
>leaning towards the auto fuel with a higher octane.
>
>I'm not sure but I think the higher octane fuel burns more completely
>and may leave less deposits. I'd like your suggestions on the octane
>rating?
No difference there. Higher octane fuel has one purpose only: It resists
detonation, or "pinging". This is typically a problem on higher
compression engines. There is no advantage to using higher octane fuel
than the manufacturer calls for... it doesn't burn cleaner, or make more
power, or leave less deposits.
However... some auto fuel manufacturers may put more or different detergent
or other additives in their "premium" higher octane fuel. This may reduce
deposits; I don't know... but it's not the octane rating that's making any
difference.
-Dana
--
Software isn't released, it's allowed to escape.
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net> |
Subject: | Re: From Lockwood Aviation re: oil and fuel |
If you are using a porous bronze filter with an oil mix you may have
a problem. Aside from blowing through them there
is no visual method to inspect. After some use, especially during
storage, they can gum up and reduce flow.
I did have one of those glass cylinder type on a VW and it was easy
to take apart to clean the plastic mesh sleeve
inside but wouldn't care to have the pot metal parts of that thing on
an airplane.
I will continue to use the "paper" filter and throw it away after
each season. They are resin impregnated and
reasonably waterproof. Cheap too.
BB
On 19, Dec 2008, at 4:53 PM, TheWanderingWench wrote:
>
>
> Hi Kolbers,
>
> This was posted today on the FlyChallenger list, and I thought it
> would be of interest.
>
> Arty Trost
> Sandy, Oregon
>
>
>> From Richard on the FlyChallenger list:
>
> I had an interesting talk with Dean from Lockwood Aviation today
> about my concerns for the best products to put through the 503 DCDI.
> I know it's been discussed at nausium, but time is drawing near for
> the crank to start turning.
>
> About oil:
> As spoken about on the list many times, Shell has bought out Penzoil.
> He stated that with the supply of Penzoil 2 stroke oil for air cooled
> engines drawing near extinction, Shell will be coming out with an oil
> especially formulated for the Rotax engine. Great news!
> It has been blind bench tested with three other brands and has
> prooved its worth. It will be out soon but he doesn't know exactly
> when or what the new product name will be. Stay tuned.
>
> Fuel:
> When asked what he would burn in a 503 if he was the owner.
>
> He stated that if your concerned about legalities and need to keep
> your fuel at the Rotax reccomended 5% or less of Ethenol then he
> would mix, as some on the list have mentioned, 50% 100LL avgas with
> 50% auto gas, 87 octane or higher that contains 10% of Ethenol.
>
> On the other hand he stated that there have been no ENGINE problems
> with running the auto gas with 10% ethenol.
> The POSSIBLE problems coud include deterioration of O-rings, Poly
> fuel tanks, fuel lines if not Ethenol rated, and other rubberized
> parts.
> He stated that he would keep a close eye on these parts if running
> straight auto fuel.
>
> Fuel filters:
> He doesn't encourage the use of paper element fuel filters when
> running Ethenol tainted fuel. Dean states that over time, I don't
> know how long, the paper absorbes the water from the Ethenol and
> swells, which can cause a fuel starvation problem.
> He suggest using a metal mesh fuel filter of 60 to 70 microns. The
> Rotax manual suggest a metal mesh also.
>
> These are his suggestions and I know there are vairables, but I
> thought I'd put it out there.
> I'm going to change my paper fuel filter to the metal mesh but
> haven't decided what fuel or fuel mix I may use. I'm on the fence but
> leaning towards the auto fuel with a higher octane.
>
> I'm not sure but I think the higher octane fuel burns more completely
> and may leave less deposits. I'd like your suggestions on the octane
> rating?
>
> Richard
>
>
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | Schedule vacation for MV 2009 |
From: | "John Bickham" <gearbender(at)bellsouth.net> |
I know it may seem like I am chomping at the bit on this. Unlike a lot of you
that have reached retirement or have gained their independence in other ways,
I have to pick/schedule the vacation in advance.
I have some unfinished business as far as attending the "Annual Informal MV Gathering".
Headed that way in 2003, but made some dumb decisions and didn't make
it. Going to make it a priority this year (1st vacation pick).
I'm going with the 3rd weekend in May (15, 16, and 17). Let me know if these need
to be adjusted.
I plan to be off from May 12th to May 31st. If conditions are right, I may even
head toward the Alvord, if JH wants my company and he is up to it. I know I
can be a burden and a challenge at times.
Gonna work toward that goal. Gotta get plane and pilot in condition for that trip.
Wish all my Kolb friends a blessed and happy holiday season.
--------
Thanks too much,
John Bickham
Mark III-C w/ 912UL
St. Francisville, LA
Landing a plane and being married - a few smooth moments mixed with a lot of rough
ones.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=220235#220235
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com> |
Subject: | Re: Schedule vacation for MV 2009 |
> I'm going with the 3rd weekend in May (15, 16, and 17). Let me know if
these need to be adjusted.
>
> I plan to be off from May 12th to May 31st. If conditions are right, I
> may even head toward the Alvord, if JH wants my company and he is up to
> it. I know I can be a burden and a challenge at times.
>
> John Bickham
John B/Gang:
Sounds good to me.
Mother's Day is 10 May.
Memorial Day Weekend is 23, 24, 25 May.
That makes the 2009 Unplanned/Unorganized Kolb Flyin Monument Valley 15,16,
17 May 2009.
Most of us get there on Thursday, the day before the official start of the
flyin. Takes me 2.5 days and 20 flight hours to get there from Alabama. I
usually depart on Tuesday morning and get there about noon Thursday. By
Sunday, we are loading airplanes and heading home or other exciting places.
John B will be more than welcome to fly with me to the Alvord. If we are
lucky, we may get Bruce Chaison to fly along with us. Three MKIIIs would
make a fine formation flight to the Rock House. That is if Larry and Karen
will let us land and mooch for a couple days.
John W and I missed landing at Winnemucca, NV, last year. That was the
first time we missed staying with one of my old SF buddies and his wife.
This year I plan on landing at Elko, NV, where Tony has moved, to spend the
night with them in their new house. From Elko, it is a hop skip and jump to
the Rock House.
That will give you plenty of time to make the return flight to Nauga Field,
LA.
We started this flyin at MV in May 2003. We have had a great flyin there
every year since. Look forward to another one next year.
john h
mkIII
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell(at)fmtcblue.com> |
Subject: | Re: Schedule vacation for MV 2009 |
Karen and I are looking forward to any and all of the Kolb pilots or
even those flying other types as well. There is always room and food
enough, as well as places to go and things to do. The only problem with
the plan as I see it is that "a few days" generally isn't enough to get
it all done. Plan a bit more generous stay. You see I generally don't
have any one to play with, so you have to be a real jerk to not be
welcome. 42 40.419 N 117 51.198 W - 2600 foot dirt runway, tiedowns for
6 airplanes.
Larry C
----- Original Message -----
From: John Hauck
To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Schedule vacation for MV 2009
> I'm going with the 3rd weekend in May (15, 16, and 17). Let me know
if
these need to be adjusted.
>
> I plan to be off from May 12th to May 31st. If conditions are
right, I
> may even head toward the Alvord, if JH wants my company and he is up
to
> it. I know I can be a burden and a challenge at times.
>
> John Bickham
John B/Gang:
Sounds good to me.
Mother's Day is 10 May.
Memorial Day Weekend is 23, 24, 25 May.
That makes the 2009 Unplanned/Unorganized Kolb Flyin Monument Valley
15,16,
17 May 2009.
John B will be more than welcome to fly with me to the Alvord. If we
are
lucky, we may get Bruce Chaison to fly along with us. Three MKIIIs
would
make a fine formation flight to the Rock House. That is if Larry and
Karen
will let us land and mooch for a couple days.
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com> |
Subject: | Re: Schedule vacation for MV 2009 |
> Larry C - thanks for the open invitation. Maybe you could come pass a
good time with us at Nauga Field in July. What do you make your Jambalya
with - Antelope meat? [Laughing]
>
> John Bickham
John B/Gang:
That would really be a blast if we could get the whole gang together. Don't
forget Gary Haley too.
john h
mkIII
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | Mike Welch <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com> |
Herb,
Although I don't see any pictures when I bring up his ad, Steve Green is
identified as the owner. So, in answer to your question, yes, it is his palne for
sale.
Mike Welch
MkIII
_________________________________________________________________
Send e-mail anywhere. No map, no compass.
http://windowslive.com/oneline/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_anywhere_122008
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | Mike Welch <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com> |
> it is his palne for sale.
>
> Mike Welch
> MkIII
Make that "plane". I should put on my glasses and proofrfead.<--(note: this is
a joke!)
Mike Welch
_________________________________________________________________
Send e-mail anywhere. No map, no compass.
http://windowslive.com/oneline/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_anywhere_122008
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | herb <herbgh(at)nctc.com> |
Subject: | Re: MkIII for sale |
Kinda surprised... Maybe he is selling to buy the MkIII extra that
the Kolb factory has for sale?? :-) Both look to be pretty good deals...
Herb
At 10:32 AM 12/20/2008, you wrote:
>
>
>Herb,
>
>Although I don't see any pictures when I bring up his ad, Steve Green is
>identified as the owner. So, in answer to your question, yes, it is
>his palne for sale.
>
>Mike Welch
>MkIII
>_________________________________________________________________
>Send e-mail anywhere. No map, no compass.
>http://windowslive.com/oneline/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_anywhere_122008
>
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | Re: What is your Altitude loss in a 180 degree turn? |
From: | "Richard Pike" <richard(at)bcchapel.org> |
Very interesting thread, here is my experience - in a MKIII, if you are making
a typical Kolb wonder climb, the first thing that has to be dealt with before
you can even think of making a turn back is getting the nose down. With our high
thrust line, if the engine barfs when you are in a 40 or 45 mph full throttle
climb, it only takes a couple seconds for the airspeed to fall to zero, and
the resulting stall is quite a dandy.
So I got serious a couple years back about occasionally practicing "engine barf
recoveries" at altitude. My experience is that if you are in a steep full throttle
climb and snatch the throttle back to idle, you need to immediately go to
full nose down stick and even then the airspeed will go to about zero.
Meanwhile, the airplane feels like it is simultaneously decelerating and rotating
around the main spar. (It's actually very cool) Once the airplane has transitioned
to about a 45 degree nose down attitude, it begins to accelerate, and
it doesn't feel like it actually stalls. Probably it does, but it's not apparent,
because of the odd rotation it is doing.
At this point, as soon as the airspeed indicator passes about 30, (because it is
accelerating very well) I have found that if you go to either a maximum deflection
right or left turn (keep the ball centered) and begin your pullout, you
can do a course reversal and level out in around 200 feet. Best I ever did was
160, but that was primed and ready. In actual "surprise engine barf mode," it
would probably be closer to 250 feet.
As Beauford says, Worth what ye paid for it.
Richard Pike
MKIII N420P (420ldPoops)
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=220361#220361
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com> |
Subject: | Re: What is your Altitude loss in a 180 degree turn? |
40 or 45 mph full throttle climb,>>
Hi Richard,
very intersting post.
What engine do you have.? I dont think that I would climb quite that
steeply, say 50 mph with my Jabi. With our high thrust line the nose will
tend to come up abit if you suddenly lose power making a potentialy chancy
situation just a little worse.
Cheers
Pat
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | possums <possums(at)bellsouth.net> |
Subject: | Re: What is your Altitude loss in a 180 degree turn? |
At 10:32 PM 12/20/2008, you wrote:
>
>So I got serious a couple years back about occasionally practicing
>"engine barf recoveries" at altitude. My experience is that if you
>are in a steep full throttle climb and snatch the throttle back to
>idle, you need to immediately go to full nose down stick and even
>then the airspeed will go to about zero.
>Meanwhile, the airplane feels like it is simultaneously decelerating
>and rotating around the main spar. (It's actually very cool) Once
>the airplane has transitioned to about a 45 degree nose down
>attitude, it begins to accelerate, and it doesn't feel like it
>actually stalls. Probably it does, but it's not apparent, because of
>the odd rotation it is doing.
>At this point, as soon as the airspeed indicator passes about 30,
>(because it is accelerating very well) I have found that if you go
>to either a maximum deflection right or left turn (keep the ball
>centered) and begin your pullout, you can do a course reversal and
>level out in around 200 feet. Best I ever did was 160, but that was
>primed and ready. In actual "surprise engine barf mode," it would
>probably be closer to 250 feet.
>
>
>Richard Pike
I bet if somebody did it, it would look something like this?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4600043392041186975&hl=en
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | Re: What is your Altitude loss in a 180 degree turn? |
From: | "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com> |
Richard Pike wrote:
> Very interesting thread, here is my experience - in a MKIII, if you are making
a typical Kolb wonder climb, the first thing that has to be dealt with before
you can even think of making a turn back is getting the nose down. With our
high thrust line, if the engine barfs when you are in a 40 or 45 mph full throttle
climb, it only takes a couple seconds for the airspeed to fall to zero, and
the resulting stall is quite a dandy.
> So I got serious a couple years back about occasionally practicing "engine barf
recoveries" at altitude. My experience is that if you are in a steep full throttle
climb and snatch the throttle back to idle, you need to immediately go
to full nose down stick and even then the airspeed will go to about zero.
> Meanwhile, the airplane feels like it is simultaneously decelerating and rotating
around the main spar. (It's actually very cool) Once the airplane has transitioned
to about a 45 degree nose down attitude, it begins to accelerate, and
it doesn't feel like it actually stalls. Probably it does, but it's not apparent,
because of the odd rotation it is doing.
> At this point, as soon as the airspeed indicator passes about 30, (because it
is accelerating very well) I have found that if you go to either a maximum deflection
right or left turn (keep the ball centered) and begin your pullout, you
can do a course reversal and level out in around 200 feet. Best I ever did
was 160, but that was primed and ready. In actual "surprise engine barf mode,"
it would probably be closer to 250 feet.
> As Beauford says, Worth what ye paid for it.
>
> Richard Pike
> MKIII N420P (420ldPoops)
FWIW, I had practiced this same thing a fair bit in my FS II after I'd gotten a
few hours in it and the results are really very predictable if you're accustomed
to flying very light a/c.
I will say (heresy coming!) that the ASI doesn't tell you much in the recovery
so it's better to rely on AOA maintenance skills instead. I.e. I had seen the
ASI read 40 even tho I was still basically in a stall.
My FS II required a fair bit of forward stick for a few seconds to truly get flying
again. Trying to restore level flight too early, particularly if you're practicing
recovering without adding power, can get you into a secondary stall.
But most high engine pusher light a/c I've flown, even my titan, are like this
so it's just part of doing business in a stall....
It's actually amazing how much altitude you really need to recover tho. For that
reason, I adopted a flatter climbout at higher airspeed in the FS II just in
case. I do this even in the titan.
LS
--------
LS
Titan II SS
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=220397#220397
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net> |
Subject: | brake lines/tow cart |
I went for a bit of overkill here. Steel lines to motorcycle braided
flex. I didn't want to work harden the
steel.
DSCN1768.JPG
the cart was about $35 at harbor freight. Saves my back pulling it
into the winter harbor.
I hate that painful stoop position bringing the tail under the
overhead door.
DSCN1769.JPG