Kolb-Archive.digest.vol-ic

March 25, 2009 - April 08, 2009



      >
      >
      > > Wing leveling corrections are understandable and are common to all
      >> craft but
      >> watching the ASI go from 40 to 80 in a matter of seconds is not  
      >> comfortable.
      >> BB, always bitchin about sumthin
      >
      >
      > Hey Bob!
      >
      > Might be that unconventional power plant.  ;-)
      >
      > Seriously, and I'll try my best to be, that is not a common problem  
      > with Kolb aircraft, of any model, that I am aware of.
      >
      > I don't like rough air either, but in most cases, if you are going  
      > to get where you are going, ya gotta fly...
      >
      > John W and I had a unwritten law of anything over 25 mph ground  
      > speed was reason for staying on the ground.  We demonstrated that  
      > May 2008, when we spent three days waiting for the wind to subside  
      > at Ontario, OR.  The wind averaged about 45 mph for all three days  
      > and nights.  Got used to walking around at odd angles.
      >
      > john h
      > mkIII
      >
      >
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flying videos thermals!
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Mar 25, 2009
slyck(at)frontiernet.net wrote: > That kind of air brings up my only complaint regarding my Kolb. > Strong up/down drafts involve > what I consider to be excessive pitch changes and corrections. > Whether it is a symptom > of only my individual airplane is open to question. I would prefer > that the result of a > sudden boost from below would involve less noticeable speed and pitch > changes. > Wing leveling corrections are understandable and are common to all > craft but > watching the ASI go from 40 to 80 in a matter of seconds is not > comfortable. > BB, always bitchin about sumthin > My FSII did that as well in thermally conditions, but then again the Kolb isn't an Edge 540 as far as control authority goes. The last time I flew my FSII in midday thermals was one hot day back in TX and that was indeed the last time I ever did that. The titan has significantly higher limits in stuff like that, but even then I prefer not to battle airmasses that are trying to slam the plane into the ground while I'm trying to land. The trip back here to NM from nebraska, I ran into the midday stuff over Kansas, as that was about 1 or 2 in the afternoon when I was out in that particular area. I had it slowed down to 90 and even 85mph, and I was still getting popped up into the shoulder straps from time to time. I've just accepted over the years that I don't like flying on the edge of control. Regular full-stop control movements just to maintain flight or keep the plane out of the dirt isn't a region I like to be in. I'm ok being a wuss nowadays. but in good smooth air, there wasn't a much more fun plane to climb into than my FSII. Even after I'd bought the titan and before I had to sell er, I was usually in the FSII in late afternoons shooting wheel landings or sightseeing rather than the other plane. I can tell I'm pining away for that plane a bit. The firefly idea keeps coming back too... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236117#236117 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flying videos thermals!
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Mar 25, 2009
I hate being throw up in the shoulder harness! I hate roller coasters and thats what it feels like when the negative Gs occur! :( My asi didn't fluctuate much over 10mph and the fluctuations were mostly positive gaining asi. Strong up/down drafts do not seem to be that big of an issue in my plane. There are times when I have to be aggressive with fore or aft stick to overcome a vertical gust but for the most part I only make minor pitch changes to maintain a stable pitch attitude. I did have a lot of horizontal gust which was causing my plane to yaw around a bit. You can see it happen alot in the videos. Just the ole girl wagging her tail. [Wink] I guess thats just a matter of where you are in relationship to the up or down draft as to how it affects the airplane's axes Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236121#236121 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 25, 2009
From: Jon LaVasseur <firestar503(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Air Force base open to civilains for two days in May
FYI The Ellsworth Air Force base at Rapid City SD is allowing civilians to fly in on May 23 &24 of the Memorial Day weekend. All you need is a radio. Arrival is morning. There will be lots of exhibits and the Thunderbirds will put on a show. You do need to submita waiver tothe AirForce releasing them ofresponsibility.Complete details are not yet finalized but you can get information from EAA39.org site. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 25, 2009
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: Flying videos thermals!
> >I am guilty of flying too low also. 25 mph wind over the flatlands >is fine. >When the terrain is bumpy it's time to climb. >The lumpiest part of most of my rides is when I descend to the >rolling hillsides >returning to my home strip. >BB Bob, In southeast Missouri I always flew mid day because the airport was 37 miles away. With the original ailerons, the FireFly could not be controlled in roll. One had to kick rudder to help lift a wing and so flying mid day was an exercise in dutch rolls. I found that I could not tolerate an hour or so of dutch rolls and so mounted nine inch chord ailerons. They were wonderful. With them the FireFly may bob up and down a little, but with light stick side pressure, one could keep the wings level. It made mid day flying very tolerable with out worrying about up chucking. I have continued to fly at mid day as it is more interesting. If I am going somewhere, I climb to at least 2,000 feet and mostly to 3,000 feet agl. There I discovered the thermal and winter weather rolls are greatly abated. By doing this there is only five to ten minutes of very active air that has to be tolerated climbing up or gliding down. The only time I do not feel comfortable in the FireFly is if I do not have my shoulder straps snug. If I can feel my back coming off the sling seat back, I get uncomfortable. During turbulent flight, if I do not move relative the FireFly, I am ok. Weird things will happen, but a bit of pressure on the stick and/or rudder usually set thing right. One of the advantages of flying mid day with the thermals, is that you can pick up about five mph ground speed by following a thermal street. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flying videos thermals!
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Mar 25, 2009
I have flown my MK III Xtra through mid day thermals, and it has never been a problem in pitch. The MK III Xtra has very good control in pitch and have only needed small fore and aft stick pressures to maintain level flight. I have never ever even come close to using just half stick for pitch control in turbulence. Roll control in my Kolb was to slow for me, I have never had to use rudder to get the airplane to roll level in turbulence, but it was slower than I liked so I added the Aileron Spades. With the addition of aileron spades on my Kolb, it is very controllable in roll, but being used to flying airplanes with very responsive ailerons, I am hoping to get a little better roll rate and lighter roll forces with my wingtip mod which will keep any wingtip vortices off the ailerons. Time will tell when I do this project. Remember when flying in thermals, its not just air rising and sinking, the air is swirling and moving all over the place in horizontal directions as well as vertical, so some yaw and other weird movements will happen. I never see changes in airspeed over 10 MPH in turbulence though. Gusts of 40 MPH are reason not believe the airspeed indicator though, that kind of air movement would result in severe turbulence even in a heavy jet, and would make a light airplane unflyable, and is very very rare unless in a thunderstorm or other extreme and rare condition. Heavier airplanes tend not to get thrown around so much in turbulence, and the airfoil also has a big effect on this. As John H says, the flat bottom Kolb wing loves to lift, and if there is a vertical gust, it will lift the heck out of the plane immediately, more so than other wings ! With a very high lift, slow speed wing, feeling the bumps comes with the territory. I like flying in the mornings and evenings, I don't fly mid day unless I need to go somewhere. Funny thing is my wife actually likes the turbulence, I can let her fly in the worst mid day stuff I can find and she says she wants more. One day I told her that is she likes turbulence so much that she should fly under one of the many thunderstorms we have here in South Florida. She said she would like to but had doubts as to weather the plane could handle it ! Here are some pictures flying in some convection induced turbulence, if you notice the airspeed, I do slow down for turbulence, it helps :) Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236172#236172 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/ultralightaerialkolbfloridahomestead_207.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/ultralightaerialkolbfloridaevergladesthunderstorms_840.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/ultralightaerialkolbfloridahomestead_660.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Do you have to have a current chart and AFD for X country?
Date: Mar 26, 2009
A person takes a mighty big gamble flying cross-country with old charts. Hi All, in the UK it is illegal to fly without an up to date chart. Most people fly with one, not necessarily THAT up to date but i have never heard of anyone being checked. Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flying videos thermals!
From: "ropermike" <ropermike2002(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Mar 26, 2009
I purchased my MK II in south Ms and flew it there for 6 months before bringing it home to West Texas. After unloading the plane in the middle of the summer afternoon, I couldnt resist taking it for a spin. I was shocked as it nearly beat me to death and my aileron control was very sluggish at times! It didnt take me long to get back on the ground! I found out pretty quick why they have the yearly world championship hang gliding competition 20 miles north in Big Springs, Texas......I am a early morning/ late evening flyer as I like to fly at 1000' agl or lower on my pleasure missions. I try to go up on short flights in the midday thermals every now and then just to train myself and get used to the rough air but I am still very uncomfortable. Until a few years ago, I had owned and flown a Piper Pacer for 10 years and never remember it being that rough, but then again, most of my flights with the Pacer was climbing up high and going somewhere. -------- The next best thing to playing and winning is playing and losing!...Mike Hillger Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236202#236202 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 26, 2009
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Do you have to have a current chart and AFD for X country?
At 08:18 AM 3/26/2009, pj.ladd wrote: > >in the UK it is illegal to fly without an up to date chart. Most people >fly with one, not necessarily THAT up to date but i have never heard of >anyone being checked. To the best of my knowledge there is no US regulation requiring a chart to be carried. Instead we simply have this: =A7 91.103 Preflight action. Each pilot in command shall, before beginning a flight, become familiar with all available information concerning that flight. This information must include=97 (a) For a flight under IFR or a flight not in the vicinity of an airport, weather reports and forecasts, fuel requirements, alternatives available if the planned flight cannot be completed, and any known traffic delays of which the pilot in command has been advised by ATC; (b) For any flight, runway lengths at airports of intended use, and the following takeoff and landing distance information: (1) For civil aircraft for which an approved Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual containing takeoff and landing distance data is required, the takeoff and landing distance data contained therein; and (2) For civil aircraft other than those specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, other reliable information appropriate to the aircraft, relating to aircraft performance under expected values of airport elevation and runway slope, aircraft gross weight, and wind and temperature. -Dana -- Hangover: The Wrath of Grapes. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 26, 2009
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Flying videos thermals!
At 09:13 AM 3/26/2009, ropermike wrote: >...rough air but I am still very uncomfortable. Until a few years ago, I >had owned and flown a Piper Pacer for 10 years and never remember it being >that rough, but then again, most of my flights with the Pacer was climbing >up high and going somewhere... Your Pacer had short wings and a much higher wing loading than a Kolb. -Dana -- Hangover: The Wrath of Grapes. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Do you have to have a current chart and AFD for X country?
Date: Mar 26, 2009
I tried to find the reg, but alas, I failed. Maybe some of the more informed pilots on the Kolb List can pull up this info. John W was the one who told me about sectionals and GPS's. He said if your sectional was current, the Jeppesen Data Base in your GPS did not have to be current. If your GPS was current, you were not required to have a current sectional. However, don't get ramp checked with only an expired sectional or only an expired Jeppesen Data Base in your GPS, or both. John W was an excellent source of flying info. He should have been. He lived and worked with it right out of high school, as an Army Aviator, for nearly 40 years to the day he died. I have no reason to disagree with his info. john h mkIII To the best of my knowledge there is no US regulation requiring a chart to be carried. -Dana ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Do you have to have a current chart and AFD for X country?
Date: Mar 26, 2009
Dana It would be nice if part 91.103 said up to date chart. What is says is that you need "all available information" which means no matter what all information you may have gathered you are likely to have missed something they could cite you for missing. I have said this before but If you are a EAA member there is a free flight planning service that is really worth doing. If your not a member it may still be well worth using it. You get the latest charts in knee board format and notams for your route of flight. This is especially useful if you don't have time to order the latest charts before a flight. It can also be found at areoplanner.com Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIC ----- Original Message ----- From: Dana Hague To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 12:39 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Do you have to have a current chart and AFD for X country? At 08:18 AM 3/26/2009, pj.ladd wrote: in the UK it is illegal to fly without an up to date chart. Most people fly with one, not necessarily THAT up to date but i have never heard of anyone being checked. To the best of my knowledge there is no US regulation requiring a chart to be carried. Instead we simply have this: =A7 91.103 Preflight action. Each pilot in command shall, before beginning a flight, become familiar with all available information concerning that flight. This information must include- (a) For a flight under IFR or a flight not in the vicinity of an airport, weather reports and forecasts, fuel requirements, alternatives available if the planned flight cannot be completed, and any known traffic delays of which the pilot in command has been advised by ATC; (b) For any flight, runway lengths at airports of intended use, and the following takeoff and landing distance information: (1) For civil aircraft for which an approved Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual containing takeoff and landing distance data is required, the takeoff and landing distance data contained therein; and (2) For civil aircraft other than those specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, other reliable information appropriate to the aircraft, relating to aircraft performance under expected values of airport elevation and runway slope, aircraft gross weight, and wind and temperature. -Dana -- Hangover: The Wrath of Grapes. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Do you have to have a current chart and AFD for X country
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Mar 26, 2009
Hmm... It sounds to me like Dana is right. There's no specific reg that says you must carry charts (except for 91.503, but that applies only to big iron jets and such). There's just the requirement that you get "all available information". Looks like this can be a De Facto requirement that you have a chart, i.e. you can get busted under 91.103 if there's a violation and they want to pin you with that. But that appears to be it. I'll be darned... I could have sworn it was a hard/fast requirement..... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236238#236238 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "frank.goodnight" <frank.goodnight(at)att.net>
Subject: Dates for M.V.
Date: Mar 26, 2009
Would someone please post the dates for M.V. I plan to attend but don't know when to be there. Frank Goodnight FireStar2 HKS 65 hrs. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Do you have to have a current chart and AFD for X country?
Date: Mar 26, 2009
Instead we simply have this: =A7 91.103 Preflight action.. Hi Dana. Thats enough to be going on with. I am sure that we have something similar but the way it actually works is kick the tyres (or tires) and pull the string. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Dates for M.V.
Date: Mar 26, 2009
> Would someone please post the dates for M.V. > I plan to attend but don't know when to be there. > > Frank Goodnight Here's what was published 19 Dec 08: 2009 Unplanned/Unorganized Kolb Flyin Monument Valley 15,16, 17 May 2009. Those dates are the weekend between Mothers' Day and Memorial Day Weekend. Although the "official" dates are 15, 16, and 17 May 2009, most of us get there a day early on Thursday and depart Sunday morning (14-17 May 09). Frank, where are you going to be flying from? All are welcome. Hope we have a big crowd of Kolb enthusiast. If you aren't a Kolb enthusiast, you may become one if you hang around us too long. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flying videos thermals!
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Mar 26, 2009
It takes a bit of aileron input to correct for some for the gusts. A few points in the video you can see I am having to just hold the stick to the left to keep the wing down. Next time I will get the angle set so you can see my stick inputs better. I wish the plane did have a quicker roll response. I guess what we try to avoid is what glider pilots love to get in. I wonder how rough the air feels in a glider or hang glider. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236250#236250 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flying videos thermals!
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Mar 26, 2009
grantr wrote: > I guess I am hard headed but I always wind up going out to fly in mid day conditions. I hate getting up early and I hate going out late and getting home late especially with the time change having it get dark around 8 so I choose to fly in mid day conditions. > > I don't know how rough it is in larger planes but it sure gives me a workout keeping the wings level and the airspeed and altitude constant. The winds were not bad at 5 to 10mph but thermals were! > > Its fun though and I can climb over it. It has helped me flying in these conditions to become more comfortable with the airplane. The rough air still makes me a little nervous at times especially low on final when I get a good toss. > > I have posted 21 videos! WOW I didnt realize I was enjoying this camera so much.:D > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i83zmWxqpZM&fmt=18 > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Gvs3PaElJM&fmt=18 Grant, That did not look like fun. When I flew to the Douglas Fly-In everyone was taking off around noon or 1 so I thought I'd give it a try although I knew from flying before in similar conditions that I wouldn't like it. Sure enough I got in the air and the thermals/winds rolled me to the left and what seemed like an eternity (but was probably only 3 or 4 seconds) I was finally able to get control back. I just turned my little tail around and headed for the nice comfy recliner at the FBO and waited until evening. Then I had a very nice, enjoyable flight home in the evening. I'm glad to see other's comments here with similar experiences. Hey, I also saw your snow video! That was so funny. You must have been really excited when filming it. That snow chased me all the way from Illinois. I was driving my car and everytime I stopped it would start snowing or icing. So I headed east and stopped at Jim Kmet's airport and rested for a few hours. Woke up around 4am and saw 2-3 inches of snow already building up. So I got back on the road and plowed my own route through the unplowed mountain roads (being VERY careful not to fall off the mountain...ha!). And when I finally made it to Tifton, GA it dried up and we never saw any of it in Waycross. -------- Cristal Waters Kolb Mark II Twinstar Rotax 503 DCSI Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236262#236262 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flying videos thermals!
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Mar 26, 2009
grantr wrote: > It takes a bit of aileron input to correct for some for the gusts. A few points in the video you can see I am having to just hold the stick to the left to keep the wing down. > > Next time I will get the angle set so you can see my stick inputs better. > > I wish the plane did have a quicker roll response. > I guess what we try to avoid is what glider pilots love to get in. I wonder how rough the air feels in a glider or hang glider. In a glider it's nothin.. no matter how rough you don't care in the glider and just want more. Those things are so stable with those super long wings.... It's just on landing that all the fun you had in the air suddenly goes away. That's why I basically stopped with sailplanes myself, you have to land in those conditions because you also have to fly in them. Slamming airplanes onto the ground is not the kind of fun I want to have. So I went crawling back to powered flight in the evenings and have never looked back. Now a motorglider, on the other hand... that'd give you the best of both worlds if you really needed to fly in midday conditions...... But who can afford one of those? We're fine with our small planes I think... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236264#236264 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Brian Steiner <bksss(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: How long is a folded mark 111 classic?
Date: Mar 26, 2009
A 6 foot 275 pound person wants to purchase my mark 111 classic. It was a long distance phone call and he wants to pick it up with a 16 foot car trai ler. Has anyone hauled a mark 111 on a 16 foot long trailer? Will he be a ble to fit in the cabin. I do not want him to drive 9 hours and find out t hat he is too big for it or we can not get it on his trailer. I know that we will have to make a stand to hold the tail up but am worried that it may protrude a bit far past the end of the trailer. Thanks for any help. Brian _________________________________________________________________ Share photos with friends on Windows Live Messenger http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9650734 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 26, 2009
Subject: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation
From: Jean PILLAUDIN <jean.pillaudin(at)gmail.com>
Hi Kolbers, I read a lot about chute here, don't want to launch again the debat...I know that at the Kolb's begining pilot save their life with hand launched chute. I have a question regarding the hand launch rescue chute installation on my Kolb Ultrastar. I get a chute from ParaDelta Italia, spec are: Max weight: 250kilos Max opened speed: 170 km/h Weight 5kilos See the drawing NumberOne.jpg : the chute is on a ventrally position on my thighs, It is fixed to my harness. The security belt is too long, I do put it on the top near the karabiner (see NumberThree.jpg) ? The chute must be removable easily, what is the kind of fixation do i use? Bests Regards Jean PILLAUDIN -- Jean Q' importe le frelon pourvu qu'on ai l'ivresse! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 26, 2009
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: Flying videos thermals!
> >Next time I will get the angle set so you can see my stick inputs better. > >I guess what we try to avoid is what glider pilots love to get in. I wonder how rough the air feels in a glider or hang glider. > It feels great. Loose shoulder straps let you beat your head against the canopy. Altitude is important, as you are continously flying just above stall. When something unexpected happens, altitude gives you some time to figure out what is going on or what to do. The best part is that there is no engine noise or vibration that mask ones inputs. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 26, 2009
Subject: Re: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation
From: Jean PILLAUDIN <jean.pillaudin(at)gmail.com>
Pffff The pictures! 2009/3/26 Jean PILLAUDIN > Hi Kolbers, > > I read a lot about chute here, don't want to launch again the debat...I > know that at the Kolb's begining pilot save their life with hand launched > chute. > > I have a question regarding the hand launch rescue chute installation on my > Kolb Ultrastar. I get a chute from ParaDelta Italia, spec are: > > Max weight: 250kilos > Max opened speed: 170 km/h > Weight 5kilos > > See the drawing NumberOne.jpg : the chute is on a ventrally position on my > thighs, It is fixed to my harness. > > The security belt is too long, I do put it on the top near the karabiner > (see NumberThree.jpg) ? > > The chute must be removable easily, what is the kind of fixation do i use? > > Bests Regards > > Jean PILLAUDIN > -- > Jean > > Q' importe le frelon pourvu qu'on ai l'ivresse! > > * > > * > > -- Jean Q' importe le frelon pourvu qu'on ai l'ivresse! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation
Date: Mar 26, 2009
Jean: I would use a zig-zag fold of about 10-12" to take up the extra length of the bridal, what you refer to as a security belt. Secure the fold with a couple nylon tie wraps. Then secure the folded section to a tube inside the gap seal. The end of the bridal, I would secure the loop aroung the 2" root tube of the airframe behind your head. That is where I attached my bridal on my Ultrastar. john h mkIII ----- Original Message ----- From: Jean PILLAUDIN To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:20 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation Pffff The pictures! 2009/3/26 Jean PILLAUDIN Hi Kolbers, I read a lot about chute here, don't want to launch again the debat...I know that at the Kolb's begining pilot save their life with hand launched chute. I have a question regarding the hand launch rescue chute installation on my Kolb Ultrastar. I get a chute from ParaDelta Italia, spec are: Max weight: 250kilos Max opened speed: 170 km/h Weight 5kilos See the drawing NumberOne.jpg : the chute is on a ventrally position on my thighs, It is fixed to my harness. The security belt is too long, I do put it on the top near the karabiner (see NumberThree.jpg) ? The chute must be removable easily, what is the kind of fixation do i use? Bests Regards Jean PILLAUDIN -- Jean Q' importe le frelon pourvu qu'on ai l'ivresse! get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution -- Jean Q' importe le frelon pourvu qu'on ai l'ivresse! ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: How long is a folded mark 111 classic?
From: "ces308" <ces308(at)ldaco.com>
Date: Mar 26, 2009
Well....when I pick up my m3x in January I had a 25' enclosed snow mobile trailer and we had to rig up the rear door to stay open at the top about a foot....a 26 footer would have just made it.If there is any way he can get an enclosed trailer...tell him to do it! As far as him fitting into it...I am 5' 10" tall and I fit just fine .I think anyway you look at it he is going to have to try it on ! Good luck! chris ambrose m3x-jab Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236280#236280 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/100_3018_199.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Kmet" <jlsk1(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: How long is a folded mark 111 classic?
Date: Mar 26, 2009
Brian, a 16 foot trailer has to have an extension added onto it, at least 2 feet, then it has to be wide enough for the main gear. I bought a MK-3C last year from a guy that wasn`t that tall, but had such a large girth( Belly), he couldn`t reach across to the throttle. Jim Kmet Cookeville, TN 2 MK-3C`s ----- Original Message ----- From: Brian Steiner To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:10 PM Subject: Kolb-List: How long is a folded mark 111 classic? A 6 foot 275 pound person wants to purchase my mark 111 classic. It was a long distance phone call and he wants to pick it up with a 16 foot car trailer. Has anyone hauled a mark 111 on a 16 foot long trailer? Will he be able to fit in the cabin. I do not want him to drive 9 hours and find out that he is too big for it or we can not get it on his trailer. I know that we will have to make a stand to hold the tail up but am worried that it may protrude a bit far past the end of the trailer. Thanks for any help. Brian ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Tell the whole story with photos, right from your Messenger window. Learn how! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 26, 2009
From: gliderx5(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: How long is a folded mark 111 classic?
Brian Not apples to apples, but my MKII is about 24' folded. The previous owner was about the size of your buyer, and he was able to fit in and fly it. Malcolm Morrison ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Steiner" <bksss(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:10:45 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Kolb-List: How long is a folded mark 111 classic? A 6 foot 275 pound person wants to purchase my mark 111 classic. It was a long distance phone call and he wants to pick it up with a 16 foot car trailer. Has anyone hauled a mark 111 on a 16 foot long trailer? Will he be able to fit in the cabin. I do not want him to drive 9 hours and find out that he is too big for it or we can not get it on his trailer. I know that we will have to make a stand to hold the tail up but am worried that it may protrude a bit far past the end of the trailer. Thanks for any help. Brian _________________________________________________________________ Share photos with friends on Windows Live Messenger http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid'50734 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 26, 2009
Subject: Re: How long is a folded mark 111 classic?
From: Robert Laird <rlaird(at)cavediver.com>
My 26' trailer can fit my MkIII and close the back tailgate, and, when closed, have just barely enough room to squeeze by if I want to cross to the other side. But only if you're really skinny. I've flown 2-up for a total people-weight of about 420 lbs (and I'm 6' tall), so a single 275 lbs shouldn't be an issue... but, as Jim said, reaching the throttle might be an issue if the belly is large. -- Robert On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Brian Steiner wrote: > A 6 foot 275 pound person wants to purchase my mark 111 classic. It was a > long distance phone call and he wants to pick it up with a 16 foot car > trailer. Has anyone hauled a mark 111 on a 16 foot long trailer? Will he > be able to fit in the cabin. I do not want him to drive 9 hours and find > out that he is too big for it or we can not get it on his trailer. I know > that we will have to make a stand to hold the tail up but am worried that it > may protrude a bit far past the end of the trailer. > Thanks for any help. > Brian > > ------------------------------ > Tell the whole story with photos, right from your Messenger window. Learn > how! <http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid'50732> > > * > > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 26, 2009
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Florida may tax recently purchased visiting aircraft
Hey folks, If you recently purchased a plane and plan to visit Florida such as attending Sun & Fun, you might want to be aware of the follow regarding their taxing recently purchased visiting aircraft. jerb http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/region/2009/090326florida.html ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 26, 2009
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Florida may tax recently purchased visiting aircraft
Hey folks, If you recently purchased a plane and plan to visit Florida such as attending Sun & Fun, you might want to be aware of the follow regarding their taxing recently purchased visiting aircraft. Anyone up on this? jerb <http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/region/2009/090326florida.html> ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mike Welch <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Florida may tax recently purchased visiting aircraft
Date: Mar 26, 2009
Yes=2C I recall seeing that Florida levied a 6% tax on people that flew t heir airplanes and landed at a Florida airport (including visiting aircraft attending air shows). Maybe it was on this list=2C about 2 years back. Stinkin' freaking tax thieves. Here's how it worked: (let's say you landed your new TBM turboprop at S & F) If they sent you a tax bill=2C and you thought you were immune just becau se you lived in another state...you're wrong!! So=2C you'd say "Screw 'em =2C I'll just not go back into Florida!" Hold on=2C it's not that easy!! (BTW=2C that's what I thought when California did that to me=2C and billed me after I moved out of state) Remember=2C you're talking about "the government". THEY (the thieves) ma ke the rules!! They just look into your personal records for your social s ecurity number=2C and put a TAX LIEN on you. This tax lien is immediately recorded with all three credit bureaus. You won't qualify to buy anything =2C until that lien is cleared!! (ask me how I know) To read that this thievery is being repealed is comforting. It's about t ime!! Now=2C how about a re-vote on the pork-u-lous bill?? Mike Welch > Hey folks=2C > If you recently purchased a plane and plan to visit Florida such as > attending Sun & Fun=2C you might want to be aware of the follow > regarding their taxing recently purchased visiting aircraft. Anyone > up on this? > jerb > > <http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/region/2009/090326florida.html> _________________________________________________________________ Internet Explorer 8 ' Get your Hotmail Accelerated. Download free! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mike Welch <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: AOA indicator
Date: Mar 27, 2009
Kolb people=2C A guy that makes these posted this link on a different group site. I thi nk it may get more exposure on this site=2C for those that are interested. Some pilots feel AOA is a better stall indicator than airspeed. Here's t he link: http://www.pipcom.com/~cowcam/AOAr.htm Mike Welch MkIII _________________________________________________________________ Windows Live=99 SkyDrive: Get 25 GB of free online storage. http://windowslive.com/online/skydrive?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_skydrive_032009 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Florida may tax recently purchased visiting aircraft
From: "N111KX (Kip)" <n111kx(at)mindspring.com>
Date: Mar 27, 2009
Yes, it seems that we went through this a couple years ago. It ended up with a Florida official saying is was only meant for Florida residents IIRC. Maybe they are really "going for it" now... [Rolling Eyes] -------- Kip Firestar II, N111KX Waiex, N111YX Quickie 1, N111QX Atlanta Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236341#236341 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Do you have to have a current chart and AFD for X country
From: "Thom Riddle" <riddletr(at)gmail.com>
Date: Mar 27, 2009
Some instructors erroneously teach (preach) that you must have current sectionals and current AFD in the airplane but it just isn't true. Dana's quotation from the FARs is correct, of course. However, having a current sectional may or may not satisfy that requirement nor an inspector, because the sectional may not contain all the pertinent information needed for a particular flight. It does not contain NOTAMS for your intended destination or alternates, for example. I've been ramp checked only once, enroute to southern California from Buffalo in Hays, KS after a night IFR flight. All the FAA inspector wanted to see were the AR(r)OW documents. He was pleasant and easily satisfied. Your experience may vary. We keep a current local sectional in our airplane and rarely cross its borders. About once a year we update our GPS, sometimes more often. -------- Thom Riddle Buffalo, NY http://riddletr.googlepages.com/sportpilot-cfi http://riddletr.googlepages.com/a%26pmechanix A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works. - John Gaule Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236342#236342 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flying videos thermals!
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Mar 27, 2009
> Hey, I also saw your snow video! That was so funny. You must have been really excited when filming it. Yep giddy as a school girl on a playground :D My Wife and i did have a blast running around in it and throwing snow balls. Someone down the road made a snow man. It was nice to see the snow and it was nice to see it go away. The 1st few times I flew in mid day conditions solo it scared the crap out of me. Actually on my 2nd solo flight i encountered some rough air and man that made me nervous. I was literally shaking. Now I get a tad nervous in the real rough bumps but nothing like before. The more comfortable you become with the bumpy air the more you will enjoy flying in it as it doesn't bother you as much. Nothing beats a late afternoon flight or early morning one though. Thats like sitting in a lounge chair in the sky. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236345#236345 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Brian Steiner <bksss(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: =?windows-1256?Q?How_long_i?= =?windows-1256?Q?s_a_folded?=
=?windows-1256?Q?_mark_111_?= =?windows-1256?Q?classic=3F=FE?
Date: Mar 27, 2009
Thanks for all the help. He decided to take a trip out my way and check it out before finding a trailer. I am relieved that he will not be pulling a trailer a long distance it without seeing it first. Brian _________________________________________________________________ Chat with the whole group, and bring everyone together. http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid'50735 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 27, 2009
From: herb <herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Subject: Re: AOA indicator
Mike I haven't looked through all of my email this morning...taking them as they come....that said... I like the simplicity of the angle of attack indicator on the linked page... except...the bracket and pickup head are on single bolts...meaning that with temp; they could pivot...causing incorrect indications... simple to fix... use single bolt while adjusting and then go with double ones.... Herb At 07:33 AM 3/27/2009, you wrote: >Kolb people, > > A guy that makes these posted this link on a > different group site. I think it may get more > exposure on this site, for those that are interested. > Some pilots feel AOA is a better stall > indicator than airspeed. Here's the link: > ><http://www.pipcom.com/~cowcam/AOAr.htm>http://www.pipcom.com/~cowcam/AOAr. htm > >Mike Welch >MkIII > > >---------- >Windows Live=99 SkyDrive: Get 25 GB of free online >storage. ><http://windowslive.com/online/skydrive?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_skydrive_032009 >Check >it out. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 27, 2009
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: rivets
- I noticed that the rivets holding the outer end of the drag strut and d rag strut brackets apparently are regular steel rivets- not stainless steel .- The wings are about 1986 vintage.- Is this normal, or should they be changed to stainless?- This is on an original Firestar.- I noticed rus t on the heads, and a magnet sticks firmly to them. - ------------------------- ----------------------- Bill Sullivan ------------------------- ----------------------- Winds or Locks, Ct. ------------------------- ----------------------- FS 44 7 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 27, 2009
Subject: Re: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation
From: Jean PILLAUDIN <jean.pillaudin(at)gmail.com>
Thank's a lot John, I need to understand all of your sentences, i need time. I'll reply if something is not clear in my brain =8;O) Have a good Week-end. Jean 2009/3/26 John Hauck > Jean: > > I would use a zig-zag fold of about 10-12" to take up the extra length of > the bridal, what you refer to as a security belt. Secure the fold with a > couple nylon tie wraps. Then secure the folded section to a tube inside the > gap seal. The end of the bridal, I would secure the loop aroung the 2" root > tube of the airframe behind your head. That is where I attached my bridal > on my Ultrastar. > > john h > mkIII > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Jean PILLAUDIN > *To:* kolb-list(at)matronics.com > *Sent:* Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:20 PM > *Subject:* Re: Kolb-List: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation > > Pffff > > The pictures! > > 2009/3/26 Jean PILLAUDIN > >> Hi Kolbers, >> >> I read a lot about chute here, don't want to launch again the debat...I >> know that at the Kolb's begining pilot save their life with hand launched >> chute. >> >> I have a question regarding the hand launch rescue chute installation on >> my Kolb Ultrastar. I get a chute from ParaDelta Italia, spec are: >> >> Max weight: 250kilos >> Max opened speed: 170 km/h >> Weight 5kilos >> >> See the drawing NumberOne.jpg : the chute is on a ventrally position on my >> thighs, It is fixed to my harness. >> >> The security belt is too long, I do put it on the top near the karabiner >> (see NumberThree.jpg) ? >> >> The chute must be removable easily, what is the kind of fixation do i use? >> >> Bests Regards >> >> Jean PILLAUDIN >> -- >> Jean >> >> Q' importe le frelon pourvu qu'on ai l'ivresse! >> >> * >> >> get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List >> tp://forums.matronics.com >> _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> * >> >> > > > -- > Jean > > Q' importe le frelon pourvu qu'on ai l'ivresse! > > * > > * > > -- Jean Q' importe le frelon pourvu qu'on ai l'ivresse! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: rivets
Date: Mar 27, 2009
The original FS kits shipped with carbon steel pop rivets. My 1986 FS Kit was shipped with carbon steel, but I opted to spend a little more money and use SS. Yes, that was normal 23 years ago. You'll have to be the judge of whether or not they are still serviceable. Wing lift strut fittings were also riveted with carbon steel rivets. No do ubt in my mind what I would do with them after all these years. john h mkIII I noticed that the rivets holding the outer end of the drag strut and drag strut brackets apparently are regular steel rivets- not stainless steel. The wings are about 1986 vintage. Is this normal, or should they be changed to stainless? This is on an original Firestar. I noticed rust on the heads, and a magnet sticks firmly to them. Bill Sullivan Windsor Locks, Ct. FS 447 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 27, 2009
From: herb <herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Subject: Re: rivets
William I had a vintage Kolb Ultrastar some years ago. I bought it from a buddy who had stalled it in... It needed a complete uncovering and some rebuilding... If I am not mistaken...Steel rivets were the norm for many years on the early Kolb models. ? .... that said....my impression is that they do very well.....little corrosion,,,no signs of the dreaded galvanic effect that is offered by some.. I would have no worries flying a Kolb built with them... I notice , in other applications, that steel rivets seem to have less spring back ...Herb At 11:54 AM 3/27/2009, you wrote: > I noticed that the rivets holding the outer end of the drag strut > and drag strut brackets apparently are regular steel rivets- not > stainless steel. The wings are about 1986 vintage. Is this > normal, or should they be changed to stainless? This is on an > original Firestar. I noticed rust on the heads, and a magnet > sticks firmly to them. > > Bill Sullivan > Windsor Locks, Ct. > FS 447 > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 27, 2009
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb List- Rivets
- Thanks, John.- I am going to change them.- The rusty heads were bot hering me- what you can't see can hurt you. - ------------------------- ------------------------- Bill Sullivan ------------------------- ------------------------- Windsor Locks, Ct. ------------------------- ------------------------- FS 447 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "boyd" <by0ung(at)brigham.net>
Subject: AOA indicator
Date: Mar 27, 2009
Unless you are flying like a fighter pilot pulling high g levels and possible getting yourself into accelerated stall. You don't need angle of attack. Admittedly,, for a fighter pilot, it is still the best,, but for our type of flying,,, airspeed is good indicator. Keep it simple. like one less thing to have to worry about. And one less distraction , and less pilot work load. Boyd Young >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kolb people, A guy that makes these posted this link on a different group site. I think it may get more exposure on this site, for those that are interested. Some pilots feel AOA is a better stall indicator than airspeed. Here's the link: http://www.pipcom.com/~cowcam/AOAr.htm Mike Welch MkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: rivets
Date: Mar 27, 2009
> I notice , in other applications, that steel rivets seem to have > less spring back ...Herb Will you explain the above please? I don't understand what you are talking about. john h mkiii ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: AOA indicator
Date: Mar 27, 2009
And learn to fly the Kolb before adding lots of goodies and making major c hanges. Might save you a lot of time, money, and heart ache in the future. john h mkiii Keep it simple. like one less thing to have to worry about. And one le ss distraction , and less pilot work load. Boyd Young ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 27, 2009
From: herb <herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Subject: Re: rivets
John I use a hand riveter...Have a grip like Pop eye.!! When pulling stainless...I notice that I get more loose rivets that have to be drilled out... Steel rivets seem to be more conforming as one would expect...since they are of a softer,milder composition... Evidenced when drilling out!! By the way...when were stainless rivets first used as a factory requirement? Herb At 12:53 PM 3/27/2009, you wrote: > > > > I notice , in other applications, that steel rivets seem to have >>less spring back ...Herb > >Will you explain the above please? > >I don't understand what you are talking about. > >john h >mkiii > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 27, 2009
From: herb <herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Subject: Re: AOA indicator
John Dressing up a plane is a bit like dressing up a motorcycle...Lots of stickers for one.., showing the name of the engine co, name of oil, prop used,, favorite parts supplier etc..name of places we have flown... Gal friends name...etc... and as we get older...our name and address and phone number...:-) The only trouble I see with aol is the distraction one must go thru when adjusting.... I think I would install a small movie camera during the full stall landings...that are suggested and necessary...My one full stall landing required some repairs...:-) Herb At 12:57 PM 3/27/2009, you wrote: >And learn to fly the Kolb before adding lots of >goodies and making major changes. Might save >you a lot of time, money, and heart ache in the future. > >john h >mkiii > > Keep it simple=85 like one less thing to have > to worry about. And one less distraction , and less pilot work load. > >Boyd Young > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: rivets
Date: Mar 27, 2009
> I use a hand riveter...Have a grip like Pop eye.!! > > When pulling stainless...I notice that I get more loose rivets that > have to be drilled out... Steel rivets seem to be more conforming as one > would expect...since they are of a softer,milder composition... Evidenced > when drilling out!! By the way...when were stainless rivets first used > as a factory requirement? Herb I also use a hand pop rivet tool, always have. May be getting too old for one now, although I popped about 10 each 1/8 X 1/2" rivets the other day without any big problems. Never had a problem with loose SS rivets, although I must be careful to insure the rivet is fully seated before I start pulling. I agree, SS is more difficult to pull than carbon steel pop rivets. Little Mike, at Old Kolb, special ordered my SS rivets in 1986, for my FS. I am not sure when SS started getting shipped with the kits, probably some time around 1987 or 1988. Dennis Souder probably remembers. john h mkiii ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Kolb-List Digest: 26 Msgs - 03/26/09
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Mar 27, 2009
Why is there a email list and a forum for the same reading? I joined the forum and do not get email notices. When I log in I can see new posts. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236417#236417 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell(at)fmtcblue.com>
Subject: air scoop on HKS
Date: Mar 27, 2009
Jerry from Green Sky AV. sent me a pair of alum air scoops, that someone had made for an earlier model of HKS, to try to see if I could reduce the temps without moving the oil cooler. With the muffler and oil cooler on top of the Firestar wings the air is disrupted enough that the temps on the engine are way too high, bumping redline at anything over 5300 RPM's. I am pleased to report that they worked just fine. I was able to use the engine as I wished without regard to overheating for the first time. Results of the test are @ 43 degrees OAT. @ 5350 RPM - 286 degrees. @ 5750 RPM 304 degrees. @ 6150 RPM- 304 degrees. I currently have 21 hours on the engine. I flew for one hour and 12 minutes, total of one hour and 24 minutes counting warm up and burned 4 gallons of fuel. 91 Octane mogas. This is a reduction of 40 degrees through the entire range of operation. I can live with that. Larry C ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: air scoop on HKS
Date: Mar 27, 2009
Thank God!!! Now...us Rotax guys won't have to hear you whine during our visit to the Ro ck House in May. ;-) Glad you got some real relief. john h mkIII This is a reduction of 40 degrees through the entire range of operation. I can live with that. Larry C ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 27, 2009
From: herb <herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Subject: Re: air scoop on HKS
Larry Not unlike the scoops used on the Jabiru's on Titan airframes... Herb At 02:25 PM 3/27/2009, you wrote: >Jerry from Green Sky AV. sent me a pair of alum air scoops, that >someone had made for an earlier model of HKS, to try to see if I >could reduce the temps without moving the oil cooler. With the >muffler and oil cooler on top of the Firestar wings the air is >disrupted enough that the temps on the engine are way too high, >bumping redline at anything over 5300 RPM's. > >I am pleased to report that they worked just fine. I was able to use >the engine as I wished without regard to overheating for the first time. > >Results of the test are @ 43 degrees OAT. @ 5350 RPM - 286 degrees. >@ 5750 RPM 304 degrees. @ 6150 RPM- 304 degrees. I currently have 21 >hours on the engine. > >I flew for one hour and 12 minutes, total of one hour and 24 minutes >counting warm up and burned 4 gallons of fuel. 91 Octane mogas. > >This is a reduction of 40 degrees through the entire range of >operation. I can live with that. >Larry C ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell(at)fmtcblue.com>
Subject: Re: air scoop on HKS
Date: Mar 27, 2009
:-) Larry ----- Original Message ----- From: John Hauck To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 1:47 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: air scoop on HKS Thank God!!! Now...us Rotax guys won't have to hear you whine during our visit to the Rock House in May. ;-) Glad you got some real relief. john h mkIII This is a reduction of 40 degrees through the entire range of operation. I can live with that. Larry C ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 03/27/09 07:13:00 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 27, 2009
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: rivets
> >John > > I use a hand riveter...Have a grip like Pop eye.!! > > When pulling stainless...I notice that I get more loose rivets >that have to be drilled out... Steel rivets seem to be more >conforming as one would expect...since they are of a softer,milder >composition... Evidenced when drilling out!! By the way...when >were stainless rivets first used as a factory requirement? Herb > Herb, I noticed the same thing. After comparing the two the reason became clear. When looking at them with the flange to the bottom, one can see the steel rivets have less of a radius from the flat to the rivet body. This lets them drop further into the hole before pulling the mandrel. With stainless steel rivets it is important to slightly de burr or knock the edge off the hole to accommodate the rivet. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 27, 2009
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: rivets
I have had good results with Marson "Klik-Lok" rivets. These are all aluminum, retained mandrel, specially made for weatherproofness and high vibration applications... 700# shear and 500# tensile in the 3/16" size I used. I haven't used them on my UltraStar (the existing rivets look fine), but They're holding up fine in some high stress areas on one of my paramotors, with plenty of vibration (single cylinder motor). The Klik-Loks aren't available in 1/8", but their Q-Lok's are... still retained mandrel, but in steel, and considerably stronger than standard pop rivets, particularly under vibration. I plan to use either or both of these on the new airplane I'm designing. -Dana -- Resist militant "normality" -- A mind is a terrible thing to erase. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flying videos thermals!
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Mar 27, 2009
[quote="grantr"] > The more comfortable you become with the bumpy air the more you will enjoy flying in it as it doesn't bother you as much. > > Nothing beats a late afternoon flight or early morning one though. Thats like sitting in a lounge chair in the sky. I flew my friend's RV-9 and there was a HUGE difference in the way his plane handled the turbulence. It was still very bumpy (couldn't even grab hold of the dial to turn up my headset), but I still felt like I was in control of the plane. With my Mark II, I don't know if it's those big flaperons that does it but the turbulence will roll me and turn me and the controls just don't respond quick enough for me to be comfortable. I've tried it several times and it's just not something I WANT to get comfortable with or used to. I'll stick to evening/morning flights in my Mark II. -------- Cristal Waters Kolb Mark II Twinstar Rotax 503 DCSI Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236458#236458 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flying videos thermals!
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Mar 27, 2009
[quote="cristalclear13"] grantr wrote: > > I flew my friend's RV-9 and there was a HUGE difference in the way his plane handled the turbulence. It was still very bumpy (couldn't even grab hold of the dial to turn up my headset), but I still felt like I was in control of the plane. With my Mark II, I don't know if it's those big flaperons that does it but the turbulence will roll me and turn me and the controls just don't respond quick enough for me to be comfortable. I've tried it several times and it's just not something I WANT to get comfortable with or used to. I'll stick to evening/morning flights in my Mark II. Oh yeah, that's true - the former partner in my plane bought an RV6-A about a year ago. You can fly that thing in any old hurricane or dust devils you want and you barely have to move the stick. You basically don't have to worry about it until it just gets so bad that even the big iron can't fly. But of course, that's why you spend upwards of 100 large to build one of those things... and drink a fortune in gas.... and the view isn't too hot either.... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236460#236460 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "boyd" <by0ung(at)brigham.net>
Subject: rivets
Date: Mar 27, 2009
I used an air driven rivet gun... at first I was not happy with it.. it set the rivets with the same speed as a nail gun... then I built a flow restrictor so that the rivet would take a couple seconds to pull, at that speed I could push the joint tight and watch it pull the pieces together even tighter as it set the rivet. Boyd Young Kolb MKIIIC >>>>>>>>>>>>>> With stainless steel rivets it is important to slightly de burr or knock the edge off the hole to accommodate the rivet. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: air scoop on HKS
From: "ces308" <ces308(at)ldaco.com>
Date: Mar 27, 2009
Alright !!! Finally a real airplane engine !!! lol chris ambrose M3X-jab Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236472#236472 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 27, 2009
From: TheWanderingWench <thewanderingwench(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: I'm On My Way! (Yet Still At Home.)
Hi fellow aviators - I think most, but perhaps not all of you know that I'm about to take off on a mega-flight in my Drifter, flying from Sandy Oregon to Sun n Fun, round trip. Randy Simpson, a good friend and Carrera pilot will be making the flight with me, and lots of other pilots are chiming in about joining us for part of the flight. We are scheduled to leave Sunday, March 30. I was in my hangar yesterday, (Thursday) getting packed, when another pilot stopped by and pointed out that the weather forecast was for rain starting Friday night and continuing non-stop until next Tuesday or Wednesday. That's what I was afraid of when I first began planning this flight - not being able to get out of northwestern Oregon during March or even early April. I looked out at the perfect blue sky and thought: "Right now is great flying weather." I'm a great believer in taking advantage of the moment. So I called Norm and asked: "Honey, could you skip your meeting tonight and drive down to Lebanon and pick me up?" When he asked what the heck I was talking about, I explained that if I left right away and flew south to Lebanon - about 70 miles - I'd be pretty much out of the forecast rain storms. Since I had a work commitment on Friday that I absolutely couldn't walk away from, I figured that I'd leave the Drifter at the Lebanon State Airport, come home, work on Friday, and then he could drive me back to Lebanon on Sunday so I could get on with the flight. Norm, bless his heart, is used to my shenanigans. He said he'd meet me down there. So - I had a great flight yesterday. Lots of clouds but a high ceiling so not to worry. More than 20 miles visibility. Calm air. It's really peaceful flying by myself, and I enjoyed loafing along at 50-55 mph. I decided to fly strictly by pilotage instead of using my GPS, just to brush up on my ability to follow a sectional. It was great fun, but not a real test since I'm so very familiar with the area. I also turned on my SPOT tracker so that when I got home I could look up my track during the flight. (It works perfectly! I've now got a link to my SPOT tracking on my blog.) The FBO owners at Lebanon are absolutely wonderful. They have the first-ever S-LSA Hornet, which they want to use for flight instruction. They live right there at the FBO and the entire FBO looks more like a home than a business office. So Norm met me in Lebanon, we came home, I worked today (Friday,) will use tomorrow to finish packing and do miscellaneous other things at home, and will begin the 2nd leg of my flight on Sunday!!! You can check out my blog at the URL below. I still have to put our return route on the site - have almost all of the east-bound route figured out. I'll have e-mail access, so you can still be in touch. If we'll be flying your way and you'd like us to stop in, send me a phone number and airstrip coordinates (or an identifier) so I can contact you when we're a day or so out. YEAH! After months of dreaming about this, it's about to happen! Arty Trost Maxair Drifter Sandy, Oregon www.LessonsFromTheEdge.com/uladventure.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 27, 2009
From: TheWanderingWench <thewanderingwench(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Whoops - sent the wrong URL
Sorry - I forgot to add the 2009 in the URL I sent. www.LessonsFromTheEdge.com/uladventure2009.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 27, 2009
From: TheWanderingWench <thewanderingwench(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Whoops - sent the wrong URL in my last post
It should be

www.LessonsFromTheEdge.com/uladventure2009.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: I'm On My Way! (Yet Still At Home.)
Date: Mar 28, 2009
will begin the 2nd leg of my flight on Sunday!!>> Good Luck! Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Flying videos thermals!
Date: Mar 28, 2009
but the turbulence will roll me and turn me and the controls just don't respond quick enough for me to be comfortable.>> You are comparing apples and oranges. The two planes are built to do different things, just look at the wing loadings! If you you fly a low wing loading plane like the Kolb it is pointless complaining that it doesn`t handle like P45. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Florida may tax recently purchased visiting aircraft
Date: Mar 28, 2009
We had a law in Ky where the state could remove a percentage of one > savings account each year...automatically...>> Hi, we had a County Council here that tried to stop flying at weekends, including stopping off for fuel and the operation of the Flying Ambulance Service. They also wanted all planes at airfields placed so that they could not be seen from any adjacent road.. We don`t have `local taxes`, at least only ones which have been delegated by the Government so they couldn`t have raised money in the way that Florida does. Bet they would have if they could. Incidentally the Coucil in question were hauled across the coals over their proposals and told not to be so silly. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: russ kinne <russ(at)rkiphoto.com>
Subject: Re: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation
Date: Mar 27, 2009
Mon cher M. Pillaudin Mon Francais, c'est affreuse -- but maybe I can help. John Hauck is probably the most experienced Kolb pilot in the world -- and I think all he's saying is for you to arrange, by hand, the bridle (security belt?) in a "Z" shape, about 10-12 inches long; put a couple nylon tie-wraps on to hold it in that shape; then secure this to any convenient place on the airframe, inside the gap seal. Does your chute have a pilot chute? Sounds to me that a chute without one might not deploy properly, or even break the tie-wraps. That would not be good. C'est vrai! The pilot chutes that have a big spring inside are the best. Bonne chance, Russ K On Mar 27, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Jean PILLAUDIN wrote: > Thank's a lot John, I need to understand all of your sentences, i > need time. I'll reply if something is not clear in my brain =8;O) > > Have a good Week-end. > > Jean > > 2009/3/26 John Hauck > Jean: > > I would use a zig-zag fold of about 10-12" to take up the extra > length of the bridal, what you refer to as a security belt. Secure > the fold with a couple nylon tie wraps. Then secure the folded > section to a tube inside the gap seal. The end of the bridal, I > would secure the loop aroung the 2" root tube of the airframe > behind your head. That is where I attached my bridal on my Ultrastar. > > john h > mkIII > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jean PILLAUDIN > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:20 PM > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute > installation > > Pffff > > The pictures! > > 2009/3/26 Jean PILLAUDIN > Hi Kolbers, > > I read a lot about chute here, don't want to launch again the > debat...I know that at the Kolb's begining pilot save their life > with hand launched chute. > > I have a question regarding the hand launch rescue chute > installation on my Kolb Ultrastar. I get a chute from ParaDelta > Italia, spec are: > > Max weight: 250kilos > Max opened speed: 170 km/h > Weight 5kilos > See the drawing NumberOne.jpg : the chute is on a ventrally > position on my thighs, It is fixed to my harness. > > The security belt is too long, I do put it on the top near the > karabiner (see NumberThree.jpg) ? > > > The chute must be removable easily, what is the kind of fixation do > i use? > > > Bests Regards > > > Jean PILLAUDIN > > -- > Jean > > Q' importe le frelon pourvu qu'on ai l'ivresse! > > get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List > tp://forums.matronics.com > _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > > -- > Jean > > Q' importe le frelon pourvu qu'on ai l'ivresse! > > get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List > a href="http://forums.matronics.com/" target="_blank">http:// > forums.matronics.com > _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > > -- > Jean > > Q' importe le frelon pourvu qu'on ai l'ivresse! > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Hauck" <jimh474(at)embarqmail.com>
Subject: Re: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation
Date: Mar 28, 2009
Russ and All; A pilot chute on a hand deployed parachute is neither needed or required. When the container holding the parachute is thrown into the slip stream the part of the attaching bridle that is stowed inside the container is deployed opening the container allowing the suspension lines to deploy. Actually the container acts like a pilot chute. As for breaking the tie wraps, that is no problem what so ever. When the canopy opens the weight of the airplane will definitely break those tie wraps and anything else that is the way, even to include streamline chrome-moly lift struts. For those that use or plan on using a hand deployed parachute, I would suggest that if you are right handed, I would throw the parachute down and to your left. As you normally have more strength throwing it down than you would trying to toss it up. If you are left handed I would throw it in the opposite direction. I would also suggest that this procedure be practiced until it becomes second nature. When the time come to have to use it in real time, you won't have time to figure out how to throw it. No, I don't mean throw the danged parachute, just sit in your plane and go through the motions. May be a good idea every time you fly to rehearse this procedure. Worth what you paid for it. Jim Hauck ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 28, 2009
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation
At 08:07 AM 3/28/2009, Jim Hauck wrote: > >For those that use or plan on using a hand deployed parachute, I would >suggest that if you are right handed, I would throw the parachute down and >to your left. As you normally have more strength throwing it down than you >would trying to toss it up. If you are left handed I would throw it in >the opposite direction. You throw it forehand, across your lap? I would have thought you'd throw it down on the side of the arm you're using. >I would also suggest that this procedure be practiced until it becomes >second nature. When the time come to have to use it in real time, you >won't have time to figure out how to throw it. > >No, I don't mean throw the danged parachute, just sit in your plane and go >through the motions. May be a good idea every time you fly to rehearse >this procedure. The paraglider and hang glider guys often have "reserve clinics", where you hang from the harness in a gym somewhere and actually throw the parachute, then a rigger repacks it for you. -Dana -- Diplomacy: Saying "nice doggy" until you find a rock. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flying videos thermals!
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Mar 28, 2009
pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com wrote: > but the turbulence will roll me and turn me and the controls just don't > respond quick enough for me to be comfortable.>> > > You are comparing apples and oranges. The two planes are built to do > different things, just look at the wing loadings! > If you you fly a low wing loading plane like the Kolb it is pointless > complaining that it doesn`t handle like P45. > > Cheers > > Pat Lucien and Pat, You guys are misunderstanding me. I am not complaining about my Mark II in any way or wanting some other plane. I LOVE my Kolb and how it handles and flies and lands and takes off and taxis and anything else I could possibly think that my plane does. I wouldn't trade it for anything. I am just explaining why I don't fly in mid-day thermals in it. This is no problem for me. Like when I went to Douglas, I was in no rush to get home, matter of fact the nice rest I got on their big comfy recliner was quite refreshing (especially after standing around in the hot sun all morning) before I made the trek home that evening. I fly for the relaxation and the VIEW. Nothing beats the view in my Kolb...nothing! -------- Cristal Waters Kolb Mark II Twinstar Rotax 503 DCSI Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236515#236515 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation
Date: Mar 28, 2009
I doubt anybody on the Kolb List is using a hand deployed parachute. When I got mine, 1984, ballistic recovery systems were extremely new, and my poo r budget would not allow me to have one. It took extra time to get into th e parachute harness, was cumbersome getting in and out of the airplane with it on, difficult to get the seat belt and shoulder harness connected, and finally, the weight of the parachute was always on top of my legs. I often dreamed of the ease of getting in and out of an airplane equipped with a b allistic parachute. So much easier to get in, buckle up, and take off. Ho wever, my desire to fly was so great, I never complained about the hours th at Jim Handbury hand deployed parachute rode in my lap. Brother Jim is correct. I could best grasp the handle on top of the pack t ray with both hands, snatch the deployment bag out of the pack tray, then t hrow it out, down and to the left, with both hands. I am right handed. A left hander will probably be able to do a better job of tossing out the dep loyment bag down and to the right. October 1985, I flew to Florida so Brother Jim could repack my parachute. Before we opened it up, Jim asked me if I had ever practiced deploying it. I had not. He told me to put it on, sit down on the ac unit beside the ho use, and throw it. I did. Seven days later the parachute saved my life. john h ----- You throw it forehand, across your lap? I would have thought you' d throw it down on the side of the arm you're using. -Dana ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flying videos thermals!
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Mar 28, 2009
cristalclear13 wrote: > > Lucien and Pat, > You guys are misunderstanding me. I am not complaining about my Mark II in any way or wanting some other plane. I LOVE my Kolb and how it handles and flies and lands and takes off and taxis and anything else I could possibly think that my plane does. I wouldn't trade it for anything. I am just explaining why I don't fly in mid-day thermals in it. This is no problem for me. Like when I went to Douglas, I was in no rush to get home, matter of fact the nice rest I got on their big comfy recliner was quite refreshing (especially after standing around in the hot sun all morning) before I made the trek home that evening. I fly for the relaxation and the VIEW. Nothing beats the view in my Kolb...nothing! Er no I'm not complaining either. You can't goof around the patch with a great view in the RV like you can in a Kolb or other light a/c. Even if I could hold a medical, I'd have to be rich enough to do both an RV and a Kolb or Titan ;). Otherwise I'd still choose the latter as that's my preferred flight experience. I don't normally like to use personal aviation for travel anyway, just not my normal mission... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236537#236537 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Hauck" <jimh474(at)embarqmail.com>
Subject: Re: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation
Date: Mar 28, 2009
Dana and All; Yes, you throw it across your body and down. Jim Hauck ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "boyd" <by0ung(at)brigham.net>
Subject: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation
Date: Mar 28, 2009
Dana and All; Yes, you throw it across your body and down. Jim Hauck >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am no expert,,,,, never been there,,,, never done that,,,,, but,,,,,, from a sitting position, across your body and down is the direction =93I=94 would have the most throwing power,,,, that said,,,,,,, I would route the attaching hardware so that it will cause the least upset of the plane and occupants when the chute opens. I am sure that if used it would be upsetting enough,,,, but if because of the routing of the attachment bridle you did an extra 1 =BD flip with 2 =BD twist,,, don=92t get me wrong, that may still be better than impact at 300 foot per sec=85 but a nice smooth opening in as straight and level mode as possible,,, would be preferable. But then again who is to say what attitude you may be in at the time. Boyd Young My .02 worth. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Souder" <flykolb(at)pa.net>
Subject: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation
Date: Mar 28, 2009
I too had the dubious opportunity of deploying a Handbury (hand deployed) when I failed a wing on the UltraStar. At the speed I was traveling, throwing it one way or the other would have been like attempting to spit into a hurricane. All I recall is that when I had opened the velcro flap on the parachute - it was gone and out of sight in an instant. I am very glad that I didn't "throw it" into any of the structure where it would have gotten caught in something. Totally agree - the ballistic is preferable. Dennis _____ From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Hauck Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 9:50 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation I doubt anybody on the Kolb List is using a hand deployed parachute. When I got mine, 1984, ballistic recovery systems were extremely new, and my poor budget would not allow me to have one. It took extra time to get into the parachute harness, was cumbersome getting in and out of the airplane with it on, difficult to get the seat belt and shoulder harness connected, and finally, the weight of the parachute was always on top of my legs. I often dreamed of the ease of getting in and out of an airplane equipped with a ballistic parachute. So much easier to get in, buckle up, and take off. However, my desire to fly was so great, I never complained about the hours that Jim Handbury hand deployed parachute rode in my lap. Brother Jim is correct. I could best grasp the handle on top of the pack tray with both hands, snatch the deployment bag out of the pack tray, then throw it out, down and to the left, with both hands. I am right handed. A left hander will probably be able to do a better job of tossing out the deployment bag down and to the right. October 1985, I flew to Florida so Brother Jim could repack my parachute. Before we opened it up, Jim asked me if I had ever practiced deploying it. I had not. He told me to put it on, sit down on the ac unit beside the house, and throw it. I did. Seven days later the parachute saved my life. john h ----- You throw it forehand, across your lap? I would have thought you'd throw it down on the side of the arm you're using. -Dana ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation
Date: Mar 28, 2009
I agree with you. The primary mission is the get yourself down safely. What attitude and the condition of the equipment does not matter one bit, in a situation like th is. Getting on the ground safely is. Both times I used my hand deployed parachute, I knew I would sacrifice the airplane. Throwing the deployment bag down and to the left sent it under t he left wing strut. When I got opening shock, it broke the round aluminum strut, allowed the left wing to fly up and over the top of the airplane, an d down on the right wing. I had 4130 streamlined struts on the FS. That strut did not break. I had both wings fully extended until I went through the tall oak and hickory trees. Then the left wing folded down a little. john h mkIII But then again who is to say what attitude you may be in at the time. Boyd Young My .02 worth. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Vince Hallam" <vince(at)devonwindmills.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation
Date: Mar 28, 2009
Hey John What caused you to need the chute each time.? Congratulations by the way. Are you saying the bridle is attached to circraft strong point , not to youor your seat belt? Im interested because I was wondereing if I could use a paragliders hand thrown back up on a sub 115 kg aircraft Tel: 01803 316191 Mob: 07941 313141 ----- Original Message ----- From: John Hauck To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 7:04 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation I agree with you. The primary mission is the get yourself down safely. What attitude and the condition of the equipment does not matter one bit, in a situation like this. Getting on the ground safely is. Both times I used my hand deployed parachute, I knew I would sacrifice the airplane. Throwing the deployment bag down and to the left sent it under the left wing strut. When I got opening shock, it broke the round aluminum strut, allowed the left wing to fly up and over the top of the airplane, and down on the right wing. I had 4130 streamlined struts on the FS. That strut did not break. I had both wings fully extended until I went through the tall oak and hickory trees. Then the left wing folded down a little. john h mkIII But then again who is to say what attitude you may be in at the time. Boyd Young My ..02 worth. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation
Date: Mar 28, 2009
Vinve H: 1-Upper aileron bell crank pulled out of pivot tube. Total loss of aileron control on my Ultrastar, immediate aileron flutter followed, although I wa s not aware it happened. Someone on the ground saw them flutter and told m e. Ultrastar and all the other Kolbs with standard dihedral are not contro lable without ailerons. 2-Leading edge of wing failure, both wings, from leading edge to the main s par. Folded up and back. Firestar would not fly in that configuration. B lanked out elevators, rudder, and ailerons. 250 feet, 75 mph, in the US. Threw the chute, got full canopy and full lin e stretch, parachute and aircraft horizontal, 1/2 occilation down and on th e ground. No injuries to me. Totalled the US. 500 feet, 75 mph, in the FS. Threw the chute, got full canopy at tree top level, through the trees, and on the ground. No injuries to me. Totalled FS. Having much better luck with the mkIII. ;-) john h mkIII What caused you to need the chute each time.? Congratulations by the way . Are you saying the bridle is attached to circraft strong point , not to y ouor your seat belt? Im interested because I was wondereing if I could use a paragliders hand thrown back up on a sub 115 kg aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 28, 2009
Subject: Re: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation
From: Jean PILLAUDIN <jean.pillaudin(at)gmail.com>
Hi All, Thank's a lot to every contributors, these information are very useful for me. I need time to understand all. Thank's to Russ K. to try in french. Have fun fly. Jean 2009/3/28 Vince Hallam > Hey John > What caused you to need the chute each time.? Congratulations by the way. > Are you saying the bridle is attached to circraft strong point , not to > youor your seat belt? > Im interested because I was wondereing if I could use a paragliders hand > thrown back up on a sub 115 kg aircraft > Tel: 01803 316191 > Mob: 07941 313141 > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* John Hauck > *To:* kolb-list(at)matronics.com > *Sent:* Saturday, March 28, 2009 7:04 PM > *Subject:* Re: Kolb-List: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation > > I agree with you. > > The primary mission is the get yourself down safely. What attitude and the > condition of the equipment does not matter one bit, in a situation like > this. Getting on the ground safely is. > > Both times I used my hand deployed parachute, I knew I would sacrifice the > airplane. Throwing the deployment bag down and to the left sent it under > the left wing strut. When I got opening shock, it broke the round aluminum > strut, allowed the left wing to fly up and over the top of the airplane, and > down on the right wing. I had 4130 streamlined struts on the FS. That > strut did not break. I had both wings fully extended until I went through > the tall oak and hickory trees. Then the left wing folded down a little. > > john h > mkIII > > But then again who is to say what attitude you may be in at the time. > > > Boyd Young > > My ..02 worth. > > > * > > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c* > > * > > * > > -- Jean Q' importe le frelon pourvu qu'on ai l'ivresse! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "The Kuffels" <kuffel(at)cyberport.net>
Subject: Re: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation
Date: Mar 28, 2009
<< zig-zag fold of about 10-12" to take up the extra length of the bridal, what you refer to as a security belt the bridle (security belt?) in a "Z" shape, about 10-12 inches long; put a couple nylon tie-wraps on to hold it in that shape; .. even break the tie-wraps. >> Of course, if you use a one-ended zig-zag with relatively loose tie-wraps, you don't have to break the tie-wraps. See the crude diagram: bridle-------------------- __ __ --------------bridle \ / \ / \ / | | | | | | Tie-Wrap --> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tie-Wrap --> | | | | | | | | | | | | |__| |__| |__| Tom Kuffel Whitefish, MT ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flying videos thermals!
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Mar 28, 2009
Don't feel bad Cristal, I don't like mid day turbulence much either, I avoid it when possible ! Sometimes I fly through midday turbulence when I want to get somewhere, it is kind of funny to watch my wife enjoy fighting the turbulence like Grant does, but I fly mostly mornings and evenings also. Its all about fun and enjoying what you are doing, if you are not then its good judgment to wait on the ground for better conditions. All I can say is that Grant has balls to fly when he does just for the fun of it ;) I was experiencing the same thing in having to hold the stick hard over for a couple seconds at a time trying to correct the roll induced by the turbulence that you are, but the aileron spades helped a lot. I never have to hold full aileron for a couple seconds anymore to keep the wings level in a thermal, I never even need full stick at all. This makes flying in rough conditions a lot less nerve racking. One thing that helps is to stay away from the Hawks, if you make the mistake of flying into an air where you see a bunch of birds soaring, you are in for some really good bumps. I use the birds often to avoid the worst thermals. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236566#236566 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Ultrastar hand launch rescue chute installation
Date: Mar 28, 2009
Tom K: Not necessary. Snug down the tie-wraps. When the canopy opens, there is e nough power to pull the kevlar bridal through aluminum and steel tubing. T he main square tube that ties the main spars together on the top of the fus elage was flattened by the bridal. It wouldn't know the tie-wraps were the re. john h mkIII Of course, if you use a one-ended zig-zag with relatively loose tie-wraps , you don't have to break the tie-wraps. See the crude diagram: bridle-------------------- __ __ --------------bridle \ / \ / \ / | | | | | | Tie-Wrap --> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tie-Wrap --> | | | | | | | | | | | | |__| |__| |__| Tom Kuffel ________________________________________________________________________________
From: russ kinne <russ(at)rkiphoto.com>
Subject: Re: I'm On My Way! (Yet Still At Home.)
Date: Mar 28, 2009
Hey, WW/Arty Go for it, girl! -- we're all proud of you. Fair winds, Russ K On Mar 28, 2009, at 12:56 AM, TheWanderingWench wrote: > > > > Hi fellow aviators - > > I think most, but perhaps not all of you know that I'm about to > take off on a mega-flight in my Drifter, flying from Sandy Oregon > to Sun n Fun, round trip. Randy Simpson, a good friend and Carrera > pilot will be making the flight with me, and lots of other pilots > are chiming in about joining us for part of the flight. > > We are scheduled to leave Sunday, March 30. I was in my hangar > yesterday, (Thursday) getting packed, when another pilot stopped by > and pointed out that the weather forecast was for rain starting > Friday night and continuing non-stop until next Tuesday or > Wednesday. That's what I was afraid of when I first began planning > this flight - not being able to get out of northwestern Oregon > during March or even early April. > > I looked out at the perfect blue sky and thought: "Right now is > great flying weather." I'm a great believer in taking advantage of > the moment. So I called Norm and asked: "Honey, could you skip your > meeting tonight and drive down to Lebanon and pick me up?" When he > asked what the heck I was talking about, I explained that if I left > right away and flew south to Lebanon - about 70 miles - I'd be > pretty much out of the forecast rain storms. Since I had a work > commitment on Friday that I absolutely couldn't walk away from, I > figured that I'd leave the Drifter at the Lebanon State Airport, > come home, work on Friday, and then he could drive me back to > Lebanon on Sunday so I could get on with the flight. Norm, bless > his heart, is used to my shenanigans. He said he'd meet me down > there. > > So - I had a great flight yesterday. Lots of clouds but a high > ceiling so not to worry. More than 20 miles visibility. Calm air. > It's really peaceful flying by myself, and I enjoyed loafing along > at 50-55 mph. > > I decided to fly strictly by pilotage instead of using my GPS, just > to brush up on my ability to follow a sectional. It was great fun, > but not a real test since I'm so very familiar with the area. I > also turned on my SPOT tracker so that when I got home I could look > up my track during the flight. (It works perfectly! I've now got a > link to my SPOT tracking on my blog.) > > The FBO owners at Lebanon are absolutely wonderful. They have the > first-ever S-LSA Hornet, which they want to use for flight > instruction. They live right there at the FBO and the entire FBO > looks more like a home than a business office. > > So Norm met me in Lebanon, we came home, I worked today (Friday,) > will use tomorrow to finish packing and do miscellaneous other > things at home, and will begin the 2nd leg of my flight on Sunday!!! > > You can check out my blog at the URL below. I still have to put > our return route on the site - have almost all of the east-bound > route figured out. > > I'll have e-mail access, so you can still be in touch. If we'll be > flying your way and you'd like us to stop in, send me a phone > number and airstrip coordinates (or an identifier) so I can contact > you when we're a day or so out. > > YEAH! After months of dreaming about this, it's about to happen! > > Arty Trost > Maxair Drifter > Sandy, Oregon > www.LessonsFromTheEdge.com/uladventure.htm > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: russ kinne <russ(at)rkiphoto.com>
Subject: Re: Florida may tax recently purchased visiting aircraft
Date: Mar 28, 2009
Pat Thank God for those that hauled the coals! Russ On Mar 28, 2009, at 6:58 AM, pj.ladd wrote: > > We had a law in Ky where the state could remove a percentage of one >> savings account each year...automatically...>> > > Hi, > we had a County Council here that tried to stop flying at weekends, > including stopping off for fuel and the operation of the Flying > Ambulance Service. They also wanted all planes at airfields placed > so that they could not be seen from any adjacent road.. > We don`t have `local taxes`, at least only ones which have been > delegated by the Government so they couldn`t have raised money in > the way that Florida does. Bet they would have if they could. > > Incidentally the Coucil in question were hauled across the coals > over their proposals and told not to be so silly. > > Cheers > > Pat > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Flying videos thermals!
Date: Mar 29, 2009
it is kind of funny to watch my wife enjoy fighting the turbulence >> Hi, I think the secret is NOT to fight the thermals. It doesn`t normally matter if you are pushed up or down 50 feet, or tilted a bit, the next gust will probably correct it to some extent. Provided of course that you are not thrown in to a dangerous position. of course. Changes of airspeed on the ASI are more likely to be caused by changes of pressure or direction in a gust rather than an actual change in the planes speed. The inertia of the plane just doesn`t change that fast and chasing the the airspeed through every change can be pretty wearing. As you approach a thermal the air gets a little bubbly, like champagne, and then a wing lifts, and there is a little surge. You put the lifting wing down and put in a bootfull of rudder, ease back on the stick to drop the speed and begin to circle to find the strong lift in the middle of the thermal and ...up you go. At least that was the way it used be when I flew gliders. Now that I am older and my stomach can no longer withstand roller coaster rides I fly mornings or evenings. If I have to fly nearer mid day I stay away from thermic sources like town roofs, ploughed fields, tarmac airfields. I watch for buzzards circling and go the other way. I stay out from under milky looking cumulus. I am just chicken...and I don`t care, I do this for fun and being thrown around as if I was in a laundry machine just doesn`t qualify. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ted Cowan" <tc1917(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: smooth flying
Date: Mar 29, 2009
Ok, after all of that stuff, I want to say this; if you want smooth flying even in the afternoon, without the bad bumps, mind grinding tugs on the stick to right yourself, the solution is easy: 'get a sling shot'. Easy as that. I flew an original firestar for close to seven years and a lot of hours. Flying to Florida to ride the coast line and just about every type of thermal you can image and you know what, I got real tired yanking and banking. Took hits that left me bruised and aching. Since I got the Slingshot, I love flying even in the afternoon. This is the most forgiving and capable flyer I have ever been in. I fly along side C150s and they are rocking and rolling harder than I. What I get is more of a pivot back and forth, left and right and a little pitch up and down but even the six and eight hundred foot risers only show up on my instruments. It weighs in at 500 lbs dry (heavier than most) has a 912UL 80 hp (had a 582 gas guzzler) and I couldnt be happier. Carrying a passenger is testy cause they have to be small to get in and it really doesnt like the extra weight but I have taken an 180 pounder up and it just requires a little more RPM to keep it going. Lands just as smooth, just requires a hundred or more feet to get up. So if you want smooth and zoom zoom, get a slingshot. Dont know about the firefly cause it is too light. Hope I didnt bore you all. But -- if you ever want the thrill of a lifetime, get to the Florida coast with us and fly the beach, 80 miles down for a grouper sandwich, two hundred feet up, two hundred feet off the beach, grand. Something else, when I rebuilt my first ultrastar, I took some advise and used stainless steel rivets. Some years later I got it back and had to repair it and I learned a lesson. Stainless rivets are the worse things in the world to drill out without overdrilling the holes. Been told by a Navy aircraft repairman, very experienced, that we should not be using steel rivets on alum. anyway. It is about dislike materials. But if you have to, use steel because it will NOT tighten as much as stainless and possibly weaken the holes as the mandrel is pulled. Stainless is actually too tight. Take a sample of alum and test pull both and you will see the stainless mandrel comes almost all the way through when you break it. There are other problems with dislike materials also. My two cents worth. A properly pulled steel rivet is better than an overpulled stainless. I want as much meat around the mandrel ball as I can get. I am sure I will get heat from this. Ted Cowan, Alabama ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: smooth flying
From: "Ralph B" <ul15rhb(at)juno.com>
Date: Mar 29, 2009
Ted, I notice the same thing in the Kolbra after many years flying the very light Firestar. It's that extra wing loading that does the trick. There is a trade off in everything, of course, and the Kolbra sink rate is much higher, especially with a passenger. Going flying today in Minnesota. Wow, the afternoon high will be 45! It's a heat wave ... Ralph -------- Ralph B Original Firestar 447 N91493 E-AB 22 years flying it Kolbra 912UL N20386 1 year flying it Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236639#236639 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: smooth flying
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Mar 29, 2009
Ralph B wrote: > Ted, I notice the same thing in the Kolbra after many years flying the very light Firestar. It's that extra wing loading that does the trick. There is a trade off in everything, of course, and the Kolbra sink rate is much higher, especially with a passenger. > > Going flying today in Minnesota. Wow, the afternoon high will be 45! It's a heat wave ... > > Ralph Does TNK even still make the Kolba? Or is it a by-request-only kit build like the FS? I've lusted after the Kolbra forever (along with a billion other planes too I guess)... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236664#236664 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mike Welch <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: smooth flying
Date: Mar 29, 2009
Lucien=2C Yes=2C I believe TNK will sell you a Kolbra kit. You are correct=2C it i s by request only. At least=2C this is what I remember from talking to Tra vis a while back. Hell=2C I guess they'd even sell you a Bell JetRanger=2C if you have the money. : ) Mike Welch sent from Gulf Shores=2C AL...here visiting youngest son=2C home from Afgha nistan=2C and grandkids > Subject: Kolb-List: Re: smooth flying > From: lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com > Date: Sun=2C 29 Mar 2009 08:50:14 -0700 > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > > > > Ralph B wrote: > > Ted=2C I notice the same thing in the Kolbra after many years flying th e very light Firestar. It's that extra wing loading that does the trick. Th ere is a trade off in everything=2C of course=2C and the Kolbra sink rate i s much higher=2C especially with a passenger. > > > > Going flying today in Minnesota. Wow=2C the afternoon high will be 45! It's a heat wave ... > > > > Ralph > > > Does TNK even still make the Kolba? Or is it a by-request-only kit build like the FS? > > I've lusted after the Kolbra forever (along with a billion other planes t oo I guess)... > > LS > > -------- > LS > Titan II SS > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236664#236664 > > > > > > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > > _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail=AE is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_03200 9 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mike Welch <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: AOA indicator
Date: Mar 29, 2009
Boyd=2C I don't believe I was advocating using an AOA. I simply stated some pilo ts feel they are a better stall indicator. I also said I think the link wi ll get more exposure on this site=2C which is true. Whether someone sees the value of an AOA in a Kolb airplane is up to that person=2C and their wants and desires. I'm not inclined to think it is to o distracting=2C or too much workload=2C if a person had one. Can't say I understand how an AOA "complicates" things=2C either. For many (Kolb) pilots=2C an AOA is just not worth the effort=2C nor the added information it may display. I can accept that. I was just passing along a link=2C that's all. Mike Welch MkIII....which is looking less like a project=2C and more like an airplane everyday. From: by0ung(at)brigham.net Subject: RE: Kolb-List: AOA indicator Date: Fri=2C 27 Mar 2009 10:41:59 -0700 Unless you are flying like a fighter pilot pulling high g levels and possible getting yourself into accelerated stall. You don=92t need angle of attack=85 Admittedly=2C=2C for a fighter pilot=2C it is still the best=2C=2C but for our type of flying=2C=2C=2C airspeed is good indicator. Keep it simple=85 like one less thing to have to worry about. And one less distraction =2C and less pilot w ork load. Boyd Young >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kolb people=2C A guy that makes these posted this link on a different group site. I think it may get more exposure on this site=2C for those that are interes ted. Some pilots feel AOA is a better stall indicator than airspeed. Here's the link: http://www.pipcom.com/~cowcam/AOAr.htm Mike Welch MkIII _________________________________________________________________ Quick access to Windows Live and your favorite MSN content with Internet Ex plorer 8. http://ie8.msn.com/microsoft/internet-explorer-8/en-us/ie8.aspx?ocid=B037 MSN55C0701A ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 29, 2009
From: herb <herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Subject: Re: smooth flying
Heck of a deal on the factory MkIII extra also... Cannot believe it has not sold!! Herb At 12:11 PM 3/29/2009, you wrote: >Lucien, > > Yes, I believe TNK will sell you a Kolbra > kit. You are correct, it is by request > only. At least, this is what I remember from talking to Travis a while back. > > Hell, I guess they'd even sell you a Bell > JetRanger, if you have the money. : ) > >Mike Welch >sent from Gulf Shores, AL...here visiting >youngest son, home from Afghanistan, and grandkids > > > Subject: Kolb-List: Re: smooth flying > > From: lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com > > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:50:14 -0700 > > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > > > > > > > > Ralph B wrote: > > > Ted, I notice the same thing in the Kolbra > after many years flying the very light > Firestar. It's that extra wing loading that > does the trick. There is a trade off in > everything, of course, and the Kolbra sink rate > is much higher, especially with a passenger. > > > > > > Going flying today in Minnesota. Wow, the > afternoon high will be 45! It's a heat wave ... > > > > > > Ralph > > > > > > Does TNK even still make the Kolba? Or is it > a by-request-only kit build like the FS? > > > > I've lusted after the Kolbra forever (along > with a billion other planes too I guess)... > > > > LS > > > > -------- > > LS > > Titan II SS > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236664#236664 > > > > > > > > > > > >---------- >Hotmail=AE is up to 70% faster. Now good news >travels really fast. ><http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_0320 09>Find >out more. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 29, 2009
From: herb <herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Subject: AOA indicator
Mike I like the idea of a "Bacon Saver/Gear saver) AOA indicator... I think something similar is used in 150's ? hooked to a big noise maker in the cockpit... :-) I turned it on regularly...much to the consternation of my asleep instructor...thought that was what it was for for a while....:-) Simplicity?? I got that....a big red idiot light ... attached to a Grand Rapids box however...:-) Herb At 12:23 PM 3/29/2009, you wrote: >Boyd, > > I don't believe I was advocating using an > AOA. I simply stated some pilots feel they are > a better stall indicator. I also said I think > the link will get more exposure on this site, which is true. > > Whether someone sees the value of an AOA in a > Kolb airplane is up to that person, and their > wants and desires. I'm not inclined to think > it is too distracting, or too much workload, if > a person had one. Can't say I understand how > an AOA "complicates" things, either. > > For many (Kolb) pilots, an AOA is just not > worth the effort, nor the added information it may display. I can accept that. >I was just passing along a link, that's all. > >Mike Welch >MkIII....which is looking less like a project, >and more like an airplane everyday. > > >---------- >From: by0ung(at)brigham.net >To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RE: Kolb-List: AOA indicator >Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:41:59 -0700 > >Unless you are flying like a fighter pilot >pulling high g levels and possible getting >yourself into accelerated stall. You don=92t need angle of attack=85 > >Admittedly,, for a fighter pilot, it is still the best,, > > but for our type of flying,,, airspeed is > good indicator. Keep it simple=85 like one > less thing to have to worry about. And one less > distraction , and less pilot work load. > > >Boyd Young > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >Kolb people, > > A guy that makes these posted this link on a > different group site. I think it may get more > exposure on this site, for those that are interested. > Some pilots feel AOA is a better stall > indicator than airspeed. Here's the link: > ><http://www.pipcom.com/%7Ecowcam/AOAr.htm>http://www.pipcom.com/~cowcam/AOA r.htm > >Mike Welch >MkIII > >http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > >---------- >Quick access to Windows Live and your favorite >MSN content with ><http://ie8.msn.com/microsoft/internet-explorer-8/en-us/ie8.aspx?ocid=B03 7MSN55C0701A>Internet >Explorer 8. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: smooth flying
From: loseyf(at)comcast.net
Date: Mar 29, 2009
RnJvbSBhIGZlbGxvdyBNYXJpbmUsIHRoYW5rIGhpbSBwbGVhc2UgZm9yICBoaXMgc2VydmljZSB0 byBvdXIgZ3JlYXQgQ291bnRyeSENClNlbnQgZnJvbSBteSBWZXJpem9uIFdpcmVsZXNzIEJsYWNr QmVycnkNCg0KLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IE1pa2UgV2VsY2ggPG1k bmFud2VsY2g3QGhvdG1haWwuY29tPg0KDQpEYXRlOiBTdW4sIDI5IE1hciAyMDA5IDEwOjExOjI1 IA0KVG86IDxrb2xiLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbT4NClN1YmplY3Q6IFJFOiBLb2xiLUxpc3Q6 IFJlOiBzbW9vdGggZmx5aW5nDQoNCg0KDQpMdWNpZW4sDQoNCiAgWWVzLCBJIGJlbGlldmUgVE5L IHdpbGwgc2VsbCB5b3UgYSBLb2xicmEga2l0LiAgWW91IGFyZSBjb3JyZWN0LCBpdCBpcyBieSBy ZXF1ZXN0IG9ubHkuICBBdCBsZWFzdCwgdGhpcyBpcyB3aGF0IEkgcmVtZW1iZXIgZnJvbSB0YWxr aW5nIHRvIFRyYXZpcyBhIHdoaWxlIGJhY2suDQoNCiAgSGVsbCwgSSBndWVzcyB0aGV5J2QgZXZl biBzZWxsIHlvdSBhIEJlbGwgSmV0UmFuZ2VyLCBpZiB5b3UgaGF2ZSB0aGUgbW9uZXkuICA6ICkN Cg0KTWlrZSBXZWxjaA0Kc2VudCBmcm9tIEd1bGYgU2hvcmVzLCBBTC4uLmhlcmUgdmlzaXRpbmcg eW91bmdlc3Qgc29uLCBob21lIGZyb20gQWZnaGFuaXN0YW4sIGFuZCBncmFuZGtpZHMNCg0KPiBT dWJqZWN0OiBLb2xiLUxpc3Q6IFJlOiBzbW9vdGggZmx5aW5nDQo+IEZyb206IGxzdGF2ZW5oYWdl bkBob3RtYWlsLmNvbQ0KPiBEYXRlOiBTdW4sIDI5IE1hciAyMDA5IDA4OjUwOjE0IC0wNzAwDQo+ IFRvOiBrb2xiLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbQ0KPiANCj4gLS0+IEtvbGItTGlzdCBtZXNzYWdl IHBvc3RlZCBieTogImx1Y2llbiIgPGxzdGF2ZW5oYWdlbkBob3RtYWlsLmNvbT4NCj4gDQo+IA0K PiBSYWxwaCBCIHdyb3RlOg0KPiA+IFRlZCwgSSBub3RpY2UgdGhlIHNhbWUgdGhpbmcgaW4gdGhl IEtvbGJyYSBhZnRlciBtYW55IHllYXJzIGZseWluZyB0aGUgdmVyeSBsaWdodCBGaXJlc3Rhci4g SXQncyB0aGF0IGV4dHJhIHdpbmcgbG9hZGluZyB0aGF0IGRvZXMgdGhlIHRyaWNrLiBUaGVyZSBp cyBhIHRyYWRlIG9mZiBpbiBldmVyeXRoaW5nLCBvZiBjb3Vyc2UsIGFuZCB0aGUgS29sYnJhIHNp bmsgcmF0ZSBpcyBtdWNoIGhpZ2hlciwgZXNwZWNpYWxseSB3aXRoIGEgcGFzc2VuZ2VyLg0KPiA+ IA0KPiA+IEdvaW5nIGZseWluZyB0b2RheSBpbiBNaW5uZXNvdGEuIFdvdywgdGhlIGFmdGVybm9v biBoaWdoIHdpbGwgYmUgNDUhIEl0J3MgYSBoZWF0IHdhdmUgLi4uDQo+ID4gDQo+ID4gUmFscGgN Cj4gDQo+IA0KPiBEb2VzIFROSyBldmVuIHN0aWxsIG1ha2UgdGhlIEtvbGJhPyBPciBpcyBpdCBh IGJ5LXJlcXVlc3Qtb25seSBraXQgYnVpbGQgbGlrZSB0aGUgRlM/DQo+IA0KPiBJJ3ZlIGx1c3Rl ZCBhZnRlciB0aGUgS29sYnJhIGZvcmV2ZXIgKGFsb25nIHdpdGggYSBiaWxsaW9uIG90aGVyIHBs YW5lcyB0b28gSSBndWVzcykuLi4NCj4gDQo+IExTDQo+IA0KPiAtLS0tLS0tLQ0KPiBMUw0KPiBU aXRhbiBJSSBTUw0KPiANCj4gDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gUmVhZCB0aGlzIHRvcGljIG9ubGluZSBoZXJl Og0KPiANCj4gaHR0cDovL2ZvcnVtcy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL3ZpZXd0b3BpYy5waHA/cD0yMzY2 NjQjMjM2NjY0DQo+IA0KPiANCj4gDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gDQo+IA0KPT09PT09PT09PT09DQo9PT09 PT09PT09PT0NCj09PT09PT09PT09PQ0KPT09PT09PT09PT09DQo+IA0KPiANCj4gDQoNCl9fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fDQpIb3RtYWlsriBpcyB1cCB0byA3MCUgZmFzdGVyLiBOb3cgZ29vZCBuZXdzIHRyYXZlbHMg cmVhbGx5IGZhc3QuDQpodHRwOi8vd2luZG93c2xpdmUuY29tL29ubGluZS9ob3RtYWlsP29jaWQ9 VFhUX1RBR0xNX1dMX0hNXzcwZmFzdGVyXzAzMjAwOQ0K ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <apilot(at)surewest.net>
Subject: Re: fuel flow meter
Date: Mar 29, 2009
Do any of the Kolb clan use a fuel flow meter? Would like one for my Mark IIIC. Vic ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Dates for M.V.
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Mar 29, 2009
John Hauck wrote: > > > Here's what was published 19 Dec 08: > > 2009 Unplanned/Unorganized Kolb Flyin Monument Valley 15,16, > 17 May 2009. > > Those dates are the weekend between Mothers' Day and Memorial Day Weekend. > > Although the "official" dates are 15, 16, and 17 May 2009, most of us get > there a day early on Thursday and depart Sunday morning (14-17 May 09). > > Frank, where are you going to be flying from? > > All are welcome. Hope we have a big crowd of Kolb enthusiast. If you > aren't a Kolb enthusiast, you may become one if you hang around us too long. > > john h > mkIII Friend of mine from work plans to tag along in his RV-6A, if RV's are welcome too.... So that might be 2 titans and an RV from NM if everything goes right with wx, vacations, etc.... well, we'll need a hefty head start but.... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236717#236717 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: smooth flying
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Mar 29, 2009
That is a very good flight report on the Slingshot, I am sure many people will like the information as they lurk here wondering which Kolb they should build. What part of the Florida coastline did you fly ? Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236727#236727 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: smooth flying
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Mar 29, 2009
P.S. The factory Kolb is about the best deal on a very nice Kolb that one will ever find. I wish that was for sale when I bought mine. Just the parts alone for that Kolb would cost more than they are asking for it, and its already built. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236729#236729 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: russ kinne <russ(at)rkiphoto.com>
Subject: Re: AOA indicator
Date: Mar 29, 2009
Guys Isn't the Cessna "stall warning horn" really an AOA indicator? The little metal tab sticking out of the leading edge gets pushed up by the relative wind & sounds the horn, when the AOA is increased. (it's just an opening in later models) Part of the preflight was to push it up (Master on) and make sure it beeps. In a near-perfect 3-point landing it would beep when you were a foot above the runway. It simply said "slow down a little more and you'll stall". Good to know. I found it very useful, but have been accused of wearing it out when swordfish-spotting & whale-photographing. On all the time. BTW, guys who fly long XC's may find this useful. My instructor used to tell me to maintain a constant altitude -- this was good for practice I suppose, because it needed constant control adjustments to maintain a certain altitude. But this is very inefficient. When you get an updraft, this procedure makes you put the nose down and speed up, spending less time in a favorable, lift-producing wind. And conversely, slow down in a downdraft, spending MORE time in an unfavorable wind. Much better (if airspace permits), to slow down in an updraft and spend the maximum amount of time there, and speed up in a downdraft, to get out of it ASAP. Within limits of course. FWIW Russ K On Mar 29, 2009, at 1:43 PM, herb wrote: > Mike > > I like the idea of a "Bacon Saver/Gear saver) AOA > indicator... I think something similar is used in 150's ? > hooked to a big noise maker in the cockpit... :-) I turned it on > regularly...much to the consternation of my asleep > instructor...thought that was what it was for for a while....:-) > > > Simplicity?? I got that....a big red idiot light ... > attached to a Grand Rapids box however...:-) Herb > > > At 12:23 PM 3/29/2009, you wrote: >> Boyd, >> >> I don't believe I was advocating using an AOA. I simply stated >> some pilots feel they are a better stall indicator. I also said I >> think the link will get more exposure on this site, which is true. >> >> Whether someone sees the value of an AOA in a Kolb airplane is >> up to that person, and their wants and desires. I'm not inclined >> to think it is too distracting, or too much workload, if a person >> had one. Can't say I understand how an AOA "complicates" things, >> either. >> >> For many (Kolb) pilots, an AOA is just not worth the effort, nor >> the added information it may display. I can accept that. >> I was just passing along a link, that's all. >> >> Mike Welch >> MkIII....which is looking less like a project, and more like an >> airplane everyday. >> >> From: by0ung(at)brigham.net >> To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com >> Subject: RE: Kolb-List: AOA indicator >> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:41:59 -0700 >> >> Unless you are flying like a fighter pilot pulling high g levels >> and possible getting yourself into accelerated stall. You don=92t >> need angle of attack=85 >> >> Admittedly,, for a fighter pilot, it is still the best,, >> >> but for our type of flying,,, airspeed is good indicator. >> Keep it simple=85 like one less thing to have to worry about. And >> one less distraction , and less pilot work load. >> >> >> >> Boyd Young >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> Kolb people, >> >> A guy that makes these posted this link on a different group >> site. I think it may get more exposure on this site, for those >> that are interested. >> Some pilots feel AOA is a better stall indicator than airspeed. >> Here's the link: >> >> http://www.pipcom.com/~cowcam/AOAr.htm >> >> Mike Welch >> MkIII >> >> >> http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> >> Quick access to Windows Live and your favorite MSN content with >> Internet Explorer 8. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ElleryWeld(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 29, 2009
Subject: Re: fuel flow meter
I useed a Fuel flow meter in my firestar and I will install one in my MK3Xtra also I got it from Boaters World Ellery in Maine Building MK3Xtra In a message dated 3/29/2009 3:08:34 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, apilot(at)surewest.net writes: --> Kolb-List message posted by: Do any of the Kolb clan use a fuel flow meter? Would like one for my Mark IIIC. Vic **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr .atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1220439616x1201372437/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID %3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "boyd" <by0ung(at)brigham.net>
Subject: Re: fuel flow meter
Date: Mar 29, 2009
Do any of the Kolb clan use a fuel flow meter? Would like one for my Mark IIIC. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hooked an aux input for the EIS to a fuel sender. it reads fuel level on the EIS to tenths of gallons, I check the starting point from a glance in the tank to see it is near where I think it should be. On a x country I burn 4 gal per hour.. and can cross check the level on the EIS to the expected fuel burn and the flight timer. If the fuel in the tank gets below 3 gal indicated it lights up the master warning light. That is my limit for reserve. Boyd ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 29, 2009
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: fuel flow meter
Got one on my Hawk. I have the fuel flow option on my Grand Rapids Technologies EIS - so far for several years it been accurate and worked. It has provided some interesting data related to prop pitch relative to performance (climb/cruise), and fuel consumption rate. jerb At 03:07 PM 3/29/2009, you wrote: > >Do any of the Kolb clan use a fuel flow meter? Would like one for >my Mark IIIC. Vic > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ElleryWeld(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 30, 2009
Subject: Re: fuel flow meter
You are right about the expensive miZer sticker I had the navman 2100 and my wing man bought the miZer and paid about 100.00 more only to find out the extra money was for the cover up sticker Ellery building MK3Xtra In a message dated 3/30/2009 6:58:31 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, planecrazzzy(at)yahoo.com writes: --> Kolb-List message posted by: "planecrazzzy" I love my Fuel flow gauge... Don't let'm sell you the one called miZer... They just put a sticker over what it REALLY is Navman 2100 It "is" a good unit... But they charged me over $100 bucks more under "aircraft" Gotta Fly... -------- . . . . . Do Not Archive Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236941#236941 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/fake_mizer_002_125.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/fake_mizer_005_415.jpg **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! %3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ElleryWeld(at)AOL.COM
Date: Mar 30, 2009
Subject: Distroying a KOLB ?
I just ran across a Kolb Mk3xtra Owner the other day that has a very nice Kolb that I would like to have (Not for free) with the 912S on Floats with total time on plane 26 Hrs the sad part of it is instead of selling it and re cooping some of his money the guy is going to cut the plane up so no one can ever fly it again because he is worried about a liability lawsuit, I really don't blame him with all the sue happy people these days but is there a way to save this from happening so the guy won't be liable for the plane ever ? I just can't imagine someone doing this to a plane this nice especially to a KOLB Ellery in Maine Building Mk3Xtra **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! %3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 31, 2009
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Destroying a Kolb
- Ellery- I am really digging in the old memory, but I seem to remember t hat there is something called a "Hold Harmless" agreement in the UCC (Unifo rm Commercial Code). - In the equipment business, we used to use UCC Forms 1 and 2 a lot, whic h were for partial title of objects- like a truck with a crane on it, and t wo suppliers involved.- Kind of a way to make sure everybody got paid.- Reassure the guy that this question is a common worry, and can be resolved .- Have him see a lawyer!- It would be a lot cheaper than destroying it .- - ------------------------- ------------------- Bill Sullivan ------------------------- ------------------- Windsor Locks, Ct . ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 31, 2009
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Destroying a Kolb
Ellery- I just had another thought.- Have him take the wings off, and sel l it as parts- "Not an airworthy vehicle".- I understand it's commonly do ne with 103's for liability reasons. - ------------------------- ------------------- Bill Sullivan ------------------------- ------------------- Windsor Locks, Ct . ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ElleryWeld(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 31, 2009
Subject: Re: Destroying a Kolb
The guy said he has already talked to a lawyer Im guessing the wrong one first Ellery in Maine In a message dated 3/31/2009 4:57:18 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, williamtsullivan(at)att.net writes: Ellery- I am really digging in the old memory, but I seem to remember that there is something called a "Hold Harmless" agreement in the UCC (Uniform Commercial Code). In the equipment business, we used to use UCC Forms 1 and 2 a lot, which were for partial title of objects- like a truck with a crane on it, and two suppliers involved. Kind of a way to make sure everybody got paid. Reassure the guy that this question is a common worry, and can be resolved. Have him see a lawyer! It would be a lot cheaper than destroying it. Bill Sullivan Windsor Locks, Ct. (http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List) (http://www.matronics.com/contribution) **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! %3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62) ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Distroying a KOLB ?
From: "Thom Riddle" <riddletr(at)gmail.com>
Date: Mar 31, 2009
Sounds to me like the guy is judgment impaired and definitely should not be flying. Why didn't he consider this issue when he built it? In addition to BB's advice to see a lawyer, perhaps he should see a shrink too. -------- Thom Riddle Buffalo, NY http://riddletr.googlepages.com/sportpilot-cfi http://riddletr.googlepages.com/a%26pmechanix A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works. - John Gaule Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236993#236993 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Eugene Zimmerman <etzimm(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Distroying a KOLB ?
Date: Mar 31, 2009
On Mar 30, 2009, at 8:41 PM, ElleryWeld(at)aol.com wrote: > is there a way to save this from happening so the guy won't be > liable for the plane ever ? The only way I know of is to sue him for all he has, including his kolb, for threatening to take the life of his Mk3xtra . ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mike Welch <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Distroying a KOLB ?
Date: Mar 31, 2009
Ellery=2C I agree with the comments so far. Thom especially described this guy. It's just amazing the number of anal people there are! First of all=2C t his guy's concerns can be covered by a simple hold-harmless release form. Secondly=2C it is damn near impossible for a private citizen to be sued by another private citizen from a different state. (costs are the biggest reas on=2C jurisdiction is the next=2C practicality=2C etc. The scope of the tr ial would have to be in the millions for anyone to get an attorney that wou ld accept the case{and he/she wouldn't take the case without a prepaid cash retainer=2C a BIG reta iner}) In the course of 30 minutes=2C this guy could generate a form to be safe from litigation. Included in the form could be: 1) plane sold as parts only=2C assembly at your own risk! 2) flying is dangerous=2C operate at your own risk 3) if this aircraft is put into service=2C it must be inspected by an FAA licensed A & P=2C and properly registered with the FAA as a Experimental Ca tegory Aircraft=2C prior to use 4) do not operate this aircraft without completing proper licensed flight instruction first=2C and be signed off by a CFI I'm not an attorney=2C but I play one on TV. Actually=2C sad to say=2C I have sued many people=2C and been sued once=2C so I do know my way around the courthouse. I wish that weren't true! I have also testified as an "expert witness" on behalf of the state about 25 times. If this guy is truly considering destroying his plane=2C because of fear of litigation=2C he shouldn't built it in the first place. He would be bet ter off living in a cave. Tell him to get a release form and relax!!! Just my thoughts..... Mike Welch MkIII > Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Distroying a KOLB ? > From: riddletr(at)gmail.com > Date: Tue=2C 31 Mar 2009 04:32:37 -0700 > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > > > Sounds to me like the guy is judgment impaired and definitely should not be flying. Why didn't he consider this issue when he built it? In addition to BB's advice to see a lawyer=2C perhaps he should see a shrink too. > > -------- > Thom Riddle > Buffalo=2C NY > http://riddletr.googlepages.com/sportpilot-cfi > http://riddletr.googlepages.com/a%26pmechanix > > A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a si mple system that works. > - John Gaule > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236993#236993 > > > > > > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > > _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail=AE is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_03200 9 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Destroying a Kolb
From: "N111KX (Kip)" <n111kx(at)mindspring.com>
Date: Mar 31, 2009
Donating to a museum sounds like a better option to me... -------- Kip Firestar II, N111KX Waiex, N111YX Quickie 1, N111QX Atlanta Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237002#237002 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: russ kinne <russ(at)rkiphoto.com>
Subject: Re: Distroying a KOLB ?
Date: Mar 31, 2009
Ellery Hold-harmless releases are quite common, and very good if properly written But I doubt if selling it as unassembled parts would totally protect him. He'd still need a H-H release And maybe sad to say, but he needs a lawyer. They often do keep people out of trouble Russ K ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Distroying a KOLB ?
From: "clrprop" <ktony(at)windstream.net>
Date: Mar 31, 2009
I know someone that did this. I think it was a Baby Ace. He destroyed the engine as well. It shocked me to hear about it. He was worried about liability as the builder even from third or fourth owners if it was resold. I guess no disclaimer can keep them from suing you. Even if you win, it might bankrupt you fighting it. He opted for the peace of mind. Can't say I would do the same. Keath T MKIII C Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237008#237008 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "George Myers" <gmyers(at)grandecom.net>
Subject: Re: Distroying a KOLB ?
Date: Mar 31, 2009
As a blue collar comedian once said "You kaint' fix stoopid". From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mike Welch Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 7:49 AM Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Re: Distroying a KOLB ? Ellery, I agree with the comments so far. Thom especially described this guy. It's just amazing the number of anal people there are! First of all, this guy's concerns can be covered by a simple hold-harmless release form. Secondly, it is damn near impossible for a private citizen to be sued by another private citizen from a different state. (costs are the biggest reason, jurisdiction is the next, practicality, etc. The scope of the trial would have to be in the millions for anyone to get an attorney that would accept the case{and he/she wouldn't take the case without a prepaid cash retainer, a BIG retainer}) In the course of 30 minutes, this guy could generate a form to be safe from litigation. Included in the form could be: 1) plane sold as parts only, assembly at your own risk! 2) flying is dangerous, operate at your own risk 3) if this aircraft is put into service, it must be inspected by an FAA licensed A & P, and properly registered with the FAA as a Experimental Category Aircraft, prior to use 4) do not operate this aircraft without completing proper licensed flight instruction first, and be signed off by a CFI I'm not an attorney, but I play one on TV. Actually, sad to say, I have sued many people, and been sued once, so I do know my way around the courthouse. I wish that weren't true! I have also testified as an "expert witness" on behalf of the state about 25 times. If this guy is truly considering destroying his plane, because of fear of litigation, he shouldn't built it in the first place. He would be better off living in a cave. Tell him to get a release form and relax!!! Just my thoughts..... Mike Welch MkIII > Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Distroying a KOLB ? > From: riddletr(at)gmail.com > Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 04:32:37 -0700 > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > > > Sounds to me like the guy is judgment impaired and definitely should not be flying. Why didn't he consider this issue when he built it? In addition to BB's advice to see a lawyer, perhaps he should see a shrink too. > > -------- > Thom Riddle > Buffalo, NY > http://riddletr.googlepages.com/sportpilot-cfi > http://riddletr.googlepages.com/a%26pmechanix > > A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works. > - John Gaule > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236993#236993 > >= Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, &g== > > > _____ HotmailR is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. Find out more. <http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_032009> ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mike Welch <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Hold Harmless Release Form
Date: Mar 31, 2009
Hold Harmless Release Form To whom it may concern: I=2C(Seller)____________________=2C sell the following aircraft=2C (or pa rts=2C or whatever)=2C to (Buyer)________________________=2C on this date__ _________. Prior to agreeing to the purchase of this aircraft (or parts=2C etc)=2C t he Buyer is advised of the following=2C and accepts ALL risks contained the rein: This aircraft=2C (or parts=2C etc) is sold with the thorough understandin g it composed of NON-CERTIFIED parts=2C that is=2C parts that the FAA has n ot deemed suitable for aircraft construction. Such parts may include=2C but not be limited to=2C hardware store bolts and fittings=2C home-made items and other types of brackets and fasteners=2C that are used to constru ct this aircraft. This aircraft=2C (or parts=2C etc.) does NOT comply with any Federal qual ity requirements=2C for use as a certified aircraft=2C and any use of this aircraft (or parts=2C etc) is at the expressed acknowledgement of the Buyer that he accepts all risks involved. buyer's initials________ Buyer further understands and agrees that building an aircraft has many u nforeseen risks. These risks may include=2C but are not limited to=2C airc raft parts longevity=2C allowable tolerances=2C parts used for manufacturer 's non-intended uses=2C undersized fasteners=2C (which may include=2C but a re not limited to=3B nuts=2C bolts=2C cables=2C screws=2C rivets=2C fabric =2C paint=2C tubing=2C etc.) Buyer fully understands and accepts that this aircraft (or parts=2C etc) is not manufactured=2C nor tested=2C by ANY qualifying entity=2C either fed eral or private. Buyer accepts the responsibility that he will thoroughly inspect=2C repair=2C create=2C or otherwise bring this aircraft (or parts =2C etc) up to a FULLY flyable=2C fully dependable=2C fully capable aircraf t=2C prior to it's intended use. Buyer's initials_________ Buyer also acknowledges that ALL aircraft in the USA are regulated by the FAA (Federal Aviation Authority). The buyer will license=2C have inspecte d=2C and maintain this aircraft to ALL legal requirements of ALL controllin g agencies=2C including=2C but not limited to=2C federal=2C state=2C and lo cal requirements and laws. Buyer is to have this aircraft (or parts=2C etc) inspected by a competent =2C fully licensed FAA "A & P mechanic"=2C with the powers necessary to sta te whether this aircraft (or parts=2C etc) is safe=2C flyable=2C and comple tely authorized for it's intended uses. Buyer is NOT to operate=2C use=2C or put into service=2C said aircraft (or parts=2C etc) without such inspect ion and approval by such authorized inspector. It is also completely understood by Buyer=2C that Seller has no control w hatsoever of the completed construction=2C maintenance=2C modification=2C a lteration=2C change of design=2C use=2C or any other method where Buyer can deviate from what Seller created=2C built or assembled. Seller does NOT c ontrol what Buyer does! Buyer's initials_____________ Buyer agrees to fully comply with ALL laws=2C rules=2C guidelines=2C etc. of all governing entities=2C with regard to building=2C repairing=2C flyin g=2C maintaining=2C and using this aircraft (or parts=2C etc) Any failure of Buyer to act in ANY unlawful=2C unauthorized=2C illegal=2C o r otherwise prohibited fashion=2C is solely the fault and actions of the Bu yer. Buyer's initials_____________ Lastly=2C Buyer understands and accepts it is his=2C and ONLY his=2C resp onsibility to see that this aircraft (or parts=2C etc) is/are trustworthy =2C and will safely perform as expected. Seller has no ability to control Buyer's further actions=2C in any regard=2C with referen ce to this transaction. Sellers liability ends with this sale=2C and any future action by Buyer is at Buyer's expense=2C both monetarily and physically. Seller______________________________________ Date_____________________ Buyer______________________________________ Date_____________________ Notary Public________________________________ Date_____________________ Seal______________________________ _________________________________________________________________ Quick access to Windows Live and your favorite MSN content with Internet Ex plorer 8. http://ie8.msn.com/microsoft/internet-explorer-8/en-us/ie8.aspx?ocid=B037 MSN55C0701A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mike Welch <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: lawyers
Date: Mar 31, 2009
Kolb people=2C I threw that together in the course of an hour and a half. I'd love to s ee someone try to sue me=2C after signing this. I wouldn't need a lawyer. I'd send a copy registered mail to their attorney=2C after I was notified I was being sued. Their attorney would ask for more "retainer" and then advise them "YOU DI DN'T TELL ME THIS!!!!" "Am I supposed to go into court and tell the judge =2C oops=2C we forgot this??!!" Any single one of the items breached in the contract/hold harmless agreem ent=2C breaches the whole thing. Maybe because I've been through the process=2C and have had to deal with so many scumbag attorneys (redundant=2C I know) that I am not hung up on th is stuff. If you don't know anything else=2C you've GOT to know this!!!! Attorneys don't do a damn thing unless they make the big bucks. And seeing their clients notarized signature on my HH Form wouldn't look too promisin g. Yes=2C the EAA probably does have a HH form=2C but I didn't look. Mike Welch _________________________________________________________________ Internet Explorer 8 ' Get your Hotmail Accelerated. Download free! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: lawyers
Date: Mar 31, 2009
Mike When the widow is standing in court crying with her six kids the jury tends to overlook any hold harmless form. Your right about the money thing. If you still have a big TARP bonus check, deep pockets, or airplane liability insurance you will be a target. For the rest of us it isn't worth the lawyers time. I personally like the statement in the hold harmless that states that this airplane is guaranteed to kill. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIC ----- Original Message ----- From: Mike Welch To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 11:25 AM Subject: Kolb-List: lawyers Kolb people, I threw that together in the course of an hour and a half. I'd love to see someone try to sue me, after signing this. I wouldn't need a lawyer. I'd send a copy registered mail to their attorney, after I was notified I was being sued. Their attorney would ask for more "retainer" and then advise them "YOU DIDN'T TELL ME THIS!!!!" "Am I supposed to go into court and tell the judge, oops, we forgot this??!!" Any single one of the items breached in the contract/hold harmless agreement, breaches the whole thing. Maybe because I've been through the process, and have had to deal with so many scumbag attorneys (redundant, I know) that I am not hung up on this stuff. If you don't know anything else, you've GOT to know this!!!! Attorneys don't do a damn thing unless they make the big bucks. And seeing their clients notarized signature on my HH Form wouldn't look too promising. Yes, the EAA probably does have a HH form, but I didn't look. Mike Welch ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Internet Explorer 8 ' Get your Hotmail Accelera'_new'>Download free! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 31, 2009
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: lawyers
From what I understand, well written hold harmless agreements can be effective in preventing the person who signed it from bringing legal action against you, but it's not binding on his heirs, even if there is verbage to that effect on the paper... IOW if he crashes and dies you can still be sued by his wife and/or kids. However, I've also read that including a stipulation in the agreement that any disputes be settled by binding arbitration rather than the courts IS binding on the heirs... and arbitration by a group of people knowledgeable in the aviation world would likely go much better for the seller than a jury of people who've never seen an airplane smaller than a 737/ -Dana -- But it's NOT an ASSAULT Weapon, it's a DEFENSE weapon! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Nick Cassara" <nickc(at)mtaonline.net>
Subject: Maule SFS-P8A tail wheel on Kolb...
Date: Mar 31, 2009
Hello John H and Kolber's I am going to follow John's lead and put a larger tail wheel on my Kolbra. I am looking at the Maule SFS-P8A in Aircraft Spruce. Since I have yet to build my tail, I am wondering if there is any need for, or recommendations of structural changes to the lower vertical Stabilizer. Thanks, Nick Cassara Palmer, AK 20*F.No volcanic ash falling today!! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: purplemoon99(at)bellsouth.net
Subject: Re: Hold Harmless Release Form
Date: Mar 31, 2009
________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mike Welch <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: lawyers
Date: Mar 31, 2009
Rick=2C This widow=2C who has six kids=2C is the same one who's husband spent all of their money on home-built airplanes=2C isn't she?? In truth=2C not very many lawsuits of this scope go to trial. They usual ly are decided by a judge=2C or mediated=2C or arbitrated. Remember=2C we' re not talking Cessna=2C or Cirrus=2C just Billy Bob. All the barstool legal advice (from me and others) doesn't diminish a tho rough HH Agreement. NOT everything in this world is someone else's (previo us) fault!! Sometimes=2C believe it or not=2C it is the guy that flew the plane's fault. I still maintain that if this guy's lawyer got his mitts on your copy of the HH Agreement=2C signed and notorized by his client=2C the re just isn't going to be much further legal action. When there is no payd ay for the bloodsucker=2C they move on ambulance chasing=2C and asbestos cl aims. Mike Welch From: NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net Subject: Re: Kolb-List: lawyers Date: Tue=2C 31 Mar 2009 11:49:22 -0400 Mike When the widow is standing in court crying with her six kids the jury tends to overlook any hold harmless form. Your right about the money thing. If y ou still have a big TARP bonus check=2C deep pockets=2C or airplane liabili ty insurance you will be a target. For the rest of us it isn't worth the la wyers time. I personally like the statement in the hold harmless that states that this airplane is guaranteed to kill. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIC ----- Original Message ----- From: Mike Welch Sent: Tuesday=2C March 31=2C 2009 11:25 AM Subject: Kolb-List: lawyers Kolb people=2C I threw that together in the course of an hour and a half. I'd love to s ee someone try to sue me=2C after signing this. I wouldn't need a lawyer. I'd send a copy registered mail to their attorney=2C after I was notified I was being sued. Their attorney would ask for more "retainer" and then advise them "YOU DI DN'T TELL ME THIS!!!!" "Am I supposed to go into court and tell the judge =2C oops=2C we forgot this??!!" Any single one of the items breached in the contract/hold harmless agreem ent=2C breaches the whole thing. Maybe because I've been through the process=2C and have had to deal with so many scumbag attorneys (redundant=2C I know) that I am not hung up on th is stuff. If you don't know anything else=2C you've GOT to know this!!!! Attorneys don't do a damn thing unless they make the big bucks. And seeing their clients notarized signature on my HH Form wouldn't look too promisin g. Yes=2C the EAA probably does have a HH form=2C but I didn't look. Mike Welch Internet Explorer 8 ' Get your Hotmail Accelera'_new'>Download free! href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List">http://www.matronics. com/Navigator?Kolb-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c _________________________________________________________________ Express your personality in color! Preview and select themes for Hotmail=AE . http://www.windowslive-hotmail.com/LearnMore/personalize.aspx?ocid=TXT_MS GTX_WL_HM_express_032009#colortheme ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: Maule SFS-P8A tail wheel on Kolb...
Date: Mar 31, 2009
although bracing won't hurt, the larger diameter tailwheels reduce stress on the whole works because they ride smoother over rough ground. If you taxi on only paved surfaces you shouldn't have to do anything. If you are going with the Maule buy the SFSA soft solid version. -a nice cushiony wheel that will never go flat. A little expensive at $400+ I installed the homebuilt 6" L-696 soft solid wheel and am very impressed. It handles and turns great and IMO is more suited to a MKIII than a larger wheel. -additionally it will fit a round tube if drilled out to match the Kolb spring. BB (not BillyBob) On 31, Mar 2009, at 1:23 PM, Nick Cassara wrote: > Hello John H and Kolber=92s > > I am going to follow John=92s lead and put a larger tail wheel on my > Kolbra. I am looking at the Maule SFS-P8A in Aircraft Spruce. > Since I have yet to build my tail, I am wondering if there is any > need for, or recommendations of structural changes to the lower > vertical Stabilizer. > > Thanks, > > Nick Cassara > > Palmer, AK > 20*F=85No volcanic ash falling today!! > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: 912 Question - Gas dripping from the Carbs
Date: Mar 31, 2009
From: "Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL" <Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland.af.mil>
Fellow 912 Drivers - Looking for your collective experiences to help me solve this 912ul mystery. Last week, after returning from a 2-hour flight in my Mark-3, I noticed gas dripping from one of the air filters. This has never happened before, so I am baffled as to what might've caused this. Here are some specifics of the flight, that might offer clues: I was flying at a higher-than-normal (for me) power setting that day - 5100 rpm. My auxiliary (electric) fuel pump was operating the whole time. It's a Facet -same as what many of us use. I also discovered fuel in the carb overflow hose - the little 1/8 inch clear tube that comes out from the carb. It only dripped for a minute or two after engine shutdown, then stopped. The engine seemed to run fine the entire flight. I suspect that the combination of 5100 rpm, plus having the electric fuel pump running, might have caused excess fuel in the carb, thus overflowing it. But I don't know this for sure. Any clues? Many thanks - Dennis Kirby Cedar Crest, NM ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: lawyers
From: "Jim ODay" <jimoday(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Mar 31, 2009
I discussed this with a personal injury lawyer. He advised me to destroy the aircraft if I no longer wanted it to be 100% safe. I did not follow his advise and sold the plane. The other defense to be safe is to be 100% broke. Civil litigation is always about money; no money = no litigation. -------- Jim O'Day Fargo, ND Former Firestar II Builder/Pilot Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237074#237074 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mike Welch <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: lawyers
Date: Mar 31, 2009
Jim=2C You found one of those worthless attorneys I mentioned. To suggest you d estroy the plane is just plain stupid=2C stupid=2C stupid!! Selling the plane was more intelligent than his advice. Remember people=2C we are talking about attorneys here. Some good=2C and some not so good. It's not like we were dealing with the best of the best....like community o rganizers=2C or anything. Mike Welch And BB=2C that was funny as hell!! > Subject: Kolb-List: Re: lawyers > From: jimoday(at)hotmail.com > Date: Tue=2C 31 Mar 2009 12:03:24 -0700 > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > > > I discussed this with a personal injury lawyer. He advised me to destroy the aircraft if I no longer wanted it to be 100% safe. I did not follow his advise and sold the plane. > > The other defense to be safe is to be 100% broke. Civil litigation is alw ays about money=3B no money = no litigation. > > -------- > Jim O'Day > Fargo=2C ND > Former Firestar II Builder/Pilot > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237074#237074 > > > > > > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > > _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail=AE is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_03200 9 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: lawyers
From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Mar 31, 2009
So I guess selling a car or motorcycle could result in the same crap. Ok say I sell my plane to someone and they take it home crash it and die. Now the family hires a lawyer to sue me for selling them an unsafe aircraft. They would probably say I willingly sold the person an aircraft that I knew was not safe to fly. What if i had a video of the demo flight performed by me and the guy on tape reading and agreeing to the hold harmless form. Would that be good evidence? And to protect my financial assets what if upon receipt of the notice of the pending lawsuit, I moved all of my assets over to my wife's name that way i did not own a dime? Cant be sued if you don't have anything right? Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237094#237094 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Distroying a KOLB ?
Date: Mar 31, 2009
From: "Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL" <Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland.af.mil>
Ellery wrote: << with all the sue happy people these days is there a way to save this from happening so the guy won't be liable for the plane ever ? >> Ellery - This topic has been asked and kicked around on the Kolb List in the past. I asked the same question to Joe Norris, of EAA Aviation Services in Oshkosh. His answer was, in short, there is NO liability trail back to the seller, by the very nature that it is an Experimental/Amateur-Built aircraft. Here's why: When the purchaser buys your aircraft, THEY must make the assertion that the entire aircraft (including the engine) is in a condition for safe operation. Further, on any given flight in an experimental aircraft, the person operating the aircraft is responsible to ascertain that the aircraft is in a condition for safe operation. Thus, there is no responsibility to any party that had previous ownership of the aircraft or its components. Joe Norris goes on to suggest that you could, if you wish, make up some form of sales document. This document would declare that the aircraft is experimental in nature, and is sold "as is, where is" with no warrantee of condition or suitability expressed or implied. I've even seen someone suggest that, if you REALLY wanted to cover yourself, you include the words, "THIS AIRCRAFT IS GUARANTEED TO KILL YOU." But that seems like overkill. Hope this helps ... Dennis Kirby Mark-3, 912ul (with a drippy carb), in Cedar Crest, NM ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 912 Question - Gas dripping from the Carbs
Date: Mar 31, 2009
From: zeprep251(at)aol.com
The only way fuel gets into the air filter is past the needle and seat.It h as to fill the float bowl high enough to be pushed out of the main jet disch arge.More pressure than the needle can handle,perhaps because of the use of the aux pump.There are different size needles and seats for higher pressure systems with the Bing 64CV.The residual pressure in the pump and hoses will force fuel past the seat until the pressure equalizes atmospheric.=C2- =C2- G Aman MK 3 C 2200 Jabiru Bing 64CV -----Original Message----- From: Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL <Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland.af.mil> Sent: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 1:59 pm Subject: Kolb-List: 912 Question - Gas dripping from the Carbs Fellow 912 Drivers =93 =C2- Looking for your collective experiences to help me solve this 912ul mystery. Last week, after returning from a 2-hour flight in my Mark-3, I noticed gas dripping from one of the air filters. This has never happened before, so I am baffled as to what might=99ve caused this. =C2- Here are some specifics of the flight, that might offer clues: I was flying at a higher-than-normal (for me) power setting that day =93 5100 rpm. My auxiliary (electric) fuel pump was operating the whole time.=C2- It=99s a Facet =93same as what many of us use. I also discovered fuel i n the carb overflow hose =93 the little 1/8 inch clear tube that comes out from the carb. =C2- It only dripped for a minute or two after engine shutdown, then stopped. The engine seemed to run fine the entire flight. I suspect that the combination of 5100 rpm, plus having the electric fuel pump running, might have caused excess fuel in the carb, thus overflowi ng it.=C2- =C2-But I don=99t know this for sure. =C2- Any clues? =C2- Many thanks =93 Dennis Kirby Cedar Crest, NM ==================== ============== ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 31, 2009
From: Jon LaVasseur <firestar503(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Distroying a KOLB ? Lawyers-lawsuits
Hi Guys,=0A=0AI have been told some time ago that while there are numerous urban legends regarding the sale of Experimental Amatuer Built aircraft tha t there has never been a successful suit, brought against a builder, that r esulted in significant damages being awarded.- Does anyone know, first ha nd of actual damages?- I am sure builders have been sued but were the sui ts successful?=0A=0AJon L=0A=0A=0A ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 912 Question - Gas dripping from the Carbs
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Mar 31, 2009
Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland. wrote: > > > > Fellow 912 Drivers > > Looking for your collective experiences to help me solve this 912ul mystery. > Last week, after returning from a 2-hour flight in my Mark-3, I noticed gas dripping from one of the air filters. > This has never happened before, so I am baffled as to what mightve caused this. > > Here are some specifics of the flight, that might offer clues: > I was flying at a higher-than-normal (for me) power setting that day 5100 rpm. > My auxiliary (electric) fuel pump was operating the whole time. Its a Facet same as what many of us use. > I also discovered fuel in the carb overflow hose the little 1/8 inch clear tube that comes out from the carb. > > It only dripped for a minute or two after engine shutdown, then stopped. > The engine seemed to run fine the entire flight. > I suspect that the combination of 5100 rpm, plus having the electric fuel pump running, might have caused excess fuel in the carb, thus overflowing it. But I dont know this for sure. > > Any clues? > > Many thanks > Dennis Kirby > Cedar Crest, NM > There was a service bulletin on the 912 fuel pump (I believe it was the FP) a while back where a possible overpressure situation could develop when an auxiliary electric pump is used. Can't remember if it was both the 80 and 100hp engines... You might check through the bulletins on rotax-owner.com and see if your engine is affected. I think you had to replace the fuel pump to comply with it. Otherwise, could just be a sticky float valve. I had one of the float bowl pins bent on one of my carbs when I first got mine, no idea how it got bent, but it made it so only one float was actually functional. The motor ran perfectly, but there was always a fine layer of gas on the float bowl after flying that I simply didn't notice for a while. Replaced the bowl and that fixed it. LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237128#237128 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 912 Question - Gas dripping from the Carbs
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Mar 31, 2009
Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland. wrote: > > > > I suspect that the combination of 5100 rpm, plus having the electric fuel pump running, might have caused excess fuel in the carb, thus overflowing it. But I dont know this for sure. > > Any clues? > > Running the engine at a higher RPM should not cause any increase in fuel pressure to the carbs. If you have the correct pressure rating electric pump, running that the entire time should not cause gas to leak out the carb. With the correct facet fuel pump installed, the pressure to the carb is the very close to the same weather the electric pump is turned on or off. Assuming you have the correct pressure facet electric pump, and assuming it has not been causing this fuel overflow in the past, I see no reason to suspect it now. >From what you describe, the float bowl of your carb is overfilling and letting it leak out of the carb at places you describe. It sounds like a stuck float or stuck float valve to me. I would also check the vitreon valve tip material on the carb float valve to make sure it is in good condition and capable of shutting off the gas in the float chamber to prevent overfilling of the float bowl. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237136#237136 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tony Oldman" <aoldman(at)xtra.co.nz>
Subject: Re: lawyers
Date: Apr 01, 2009
You could always sell it to me cheap and I could ship it down under. We do not sue people in our part of the world as we understand the principal of personal responsability, also our legal system is not set up for this. Surly anyone building a hot rod or restoring a old car must face the same problem. The mind boggles. The only ones to make a fortune are the lawyers but then again the lawyers make the laws. Tony Downunder MK111 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana Hague" <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 6:03 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: lawyers > > From what I understand, well written hold harmless agreements can be > effective in preventing the person who signed it from bringing legal > action against you, but it's not binding on his heirs, even if there is > verbage to that effect on the paper... IOW if he crashes and dies you can > still be sued by his wife and/or kids. However, I've also read that > including a stipulation in the agreement that any disputes be settled by > binding arbitration rather than the courts IS binding on the heirs... and > arbitration by a group of people knowledgeable in the aviation world would > likely go much better for the seller than a jury of people who've never > seen an airplane smaller than a 737/ > > -Dana > -- > But it's NOT an ASSAULT Weapon, it's a DEFENSE weapon! > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Wandering Wench is on her way
From: "Jimmy Young" <jdy100(at)comcast.net>
Date: Apr 01, 2009
For those who are interested, (how could one not be?) Arty Trost has begun her journey to Sun & Fun. Go to www.lessonsfromtheedge.com/uladventure2009.htm to stay informed. -------- Jimmy Young FS II, Generac V-Twin Houston TX area Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237166#237166 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: lawyers
From: loseyf(at)comcast.net
Date: Apr 01, 2009
How refreshing to know there are still Countries with their heads on straight! ------Original Message------ From: Tony Oldman Sender: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com ReplyTo: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Apr 1, 2009 3:33 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: lawyers You could always sell it to me cheap and I could ship it down under. We do not sue people in our part of the world as we understand the principal of personal responsability, also our legal system is not set up for this. Surly anyone building a hot rod or restoring a old car must face the same problem. The mind boggles. The only ones to make a fortune are the lawyers but then again the lawyers make the laws. Tony Downunder MK111 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana Hague" <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 6:03 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: lawyers > > From what I understand, well written hold harmless agreements can be > effective in preventing the person who signed it from bringing legal > action against you, but it's not binding on his heirs, even if there is > verbage to that effect on the paper... IOW if he crashes and dies you can > still be sued by his wife and/or kids. However, I've also read that > including a stipulation in the agreement that any disputes be settled by > binding arbitration rather than the courts IS binding on the heirs... and > arbitration by a group of people knowledgeable in the aviation world would > likely go much better for the seller than a jury of people who've never > seen an airplane smaller than a 737/ > > -Dana > -- > But it's NOT an ASSAULT Weapon, it's a DEFENSE weapon! > > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 01, 2009
Subject: Re: lawyers
From: "Thomas R. Riddle" <riddletr(at)gmail.com>
Mike, Good job on the HH. I too have been frivolously sued. It is no fun and not cheap regardless of who "wins." Thom in Buffalo ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 912 Question - Gas dripping from the Carbs
From: "Thom Riddle" <riddletr(at)gmail.com>
Date: Apr 01, 2009
Dennis, As others have stated, the Viton tipped float valve is probably not sealing properly. They do wear out in time and/or sometimes a tiny bit of debris can settle between the float valve and seat. If you don't have one already, pay $10 for a Bing Manual at http://www.bingcarburetor.com/manual.html and dig into the carbs (one at a time). If you have a few hundred hours or more on these carbs, it is probably time to do an inspection, cleaning and selective seal and parts replacement anyway. -------- Thom Riddle Buffalo, NY http://riddletr.googlepages.com/sportpilot-cfi http://riddletr.googlepages.com/a%26pmechanix A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works. - John Gaule Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237180#237180 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mike Welch <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: lawyers
Date: Apr 01, 2009
Thanks Thom=2C When I was sued=2C it wasn't so much as frivolous=2C as it was misdirecte d. I was a concrete contractor=2C and used a very rarely used concrete sup plier to pour a customer some flatwork. The concrete was bad. People sued me=2C I settled. Then I sued the concre te supplier. I won. With regard to building and selling your home-built airplane=2C there is way too much "hype"=2C fear factor=2C and lack of knowledge. There are all kinds of myths that some people keep alive=2C but the simple truth is=2C b eing sued for building a plane is incredibly rare. Sure=2C there's lots of horror stories=2C but these are 99% BS. (again=2C we're referrring to pri vate parties here=2C not commercial) People should just relax=2C enjoy building and flying their Kolbs. When the time comes to sell it=2C get a thorough Hold Harmless Agreement (notori zed)=2C and rest easy. Mike Welch MkIII > Date: Wed=2C 1 Apr 2009 07:54:47 -0400 > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: lawyers > From: riddletr(at)gmail.com > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > > > Mike=2C > > Good job on the HH. I too have been frivolously sued. It is no fun > and not cheap regardless of who "wins." > > Thom in Buffalo > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > > _________________________________________________________________ Rediscover Hotmail=AE: Get e-mail storage that grows with you. http://windowslive.com/RediscoverHotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Rediscover_ Storage1_042009 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: russ kinne <russ(at)rkiphoto.com>
Subject: Re: lawyers
Date: Apr 01, 2009
Grant Unfortunately, the lawyers saw that one coming long ago. You cannot divest yourself of your assets at the last minute to get some protection. Doesn't work. Even with the best of evidence, defending yourself would be way too expensive. And arbitration is way better all around, than litigation. I've had experience with the American Arbitration Ass'n; they're good and work well. BUT like the court judges, they select the next persons available, regardless of their knowledge or lack thereof, about the subject at hand. Just take the next man /woman in line. Another flaw in our system. So you could get a board that didn't know much about, or even didn't like, aviation. Big crap-shoot. Bah! On Mar 31, 2009, at 4:46 PM, grantr wrote: > > > So I guess selling a car or motorcycle could result in the same crap. > > Ok say I sell my plane to someone and they take it home crash it > and die. Now the family hires a lawyer to sue me for selling them > an unsafe aircraft. They would probably say I willingly sold the > person an aircraft that I knew was not safe to fly. > > What if i had a video of the demo flight performed by me and the > guy on tape reading and agreeing to the hold harmless form. > > Would that be good evidence? > > And to protect my financial assets what if upon receipt of the > notice of the pending lawsuit, I moved all of my assets over to my > wife's name that way i did not own a dime? > > Cant be sued if you don't have anything right? > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237094#237094 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 912 Question - Gas dripping from the Carbs
From: "Roger Lee" <ssadiver1(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Apr 01, 2009
Thom and Mike both have good points. A little wear on the needle valve attached to the floats to shut off the fuel, plus maybe more vibration at 5100 in your particular plane (for whatever reason i.e. prop or carb balance) and running an electric pump in series verse parallel could all add up to fuel bypassing the needle valve shut off in the carb and puking out the tube and or air intake. -------- Roger Lee Tucson, Az. Light Sport Repairman - Maintenance Rated Rotax Service Center 520-574-1080 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237233#237233 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 912 Question - Gas dripping from the Carbs
Date: Apr 01, 2009
From: "Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL" <Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland.af.mil>
Thanks to the 912 guys who responded to my question with good advice! Gary A. - I think you are right ... the likely culprit is my electric fuel pump pushing too much gas thru the carbs. I will try flying with the electric Facet "off" and see what happens. I may also consider plumbing my auxiliary fuel pump in parallel rather than in series, like it is now. Lucien - Good idea to look inside the float bowls - see if I have any stuck floats or bent pins. Mike B. - Again, good tips about a potential overpressure from the Facet pump, as well as a possible stuck float. I'll address each of these ideas one at a time, and report back to the List when I discover the fix. Dennis Kirby Cedar Crest, New Mexico ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
From: "Thom Riddle" <riddletr(at)gmail.com>
Date: Apr 01, 2009
This subject has been broached before but I thought it might be worth noting again. Some Kolbers have been searching for a transparent gascolator with drain valve. I found one which you can see here. http://www.rotaxparts.net/scripts/prodView.asp?idproduct=690 I know nothing about it but what is said in the ad. -------- Thom Riddle Buffalo, NY http://riddletr.googlepages.com/sportpilot-cfi http://riddletr.googlepages.com/a%26pmechanix A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works. - John Gaule Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237250#237250 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 01, 2009
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
- Racor has been around for a long time.- Back in the early '70's, the company I worked for had bought a bunch of VW Rabbit diesels, and they were equiped with these to get the water out.- Worked very well with diesel. -- The last company I worked for had trouble with water in the diesel, and we acquired what we referred to as "plastic tampons".- They were abou t an inch in diameter and 6 inches long, and had an exterior plastic cage w ith a mesh screen inside.- In that was some dessicant crystals that would expand as water was absorbed.- When the cage was full, we would replace. - I think they could be dried, but I'd be real careful with gas.- These had a string to tie them to the gas cap.- I believe they were inexpensiv e, and I know they worked great- especially on yard equipment that was not fueled very often.- Seems like these would be ideal for aircraft. - ------------------------- -------------------- Bill Sullivan ------------------------- -------------------- Windsor Locks, ct. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
From: "George Alexander" <gtalexander(at)att.net>
Date: Apr 01, 2009
williamtsullivan(at)att.n wrote: > < < > > Seems like these would be ideal for aircraft. > > Bill Sullivan > Windsor Locks, ct. > Some caution...... Might be a similar issue as the "Mr Funnel" filters for those aircraft using pre-mix. (Over time loses the ability to trap water out of fuel.) -------- George Alexander FS II R503 N709FS http://gtalexander.home.att.net Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237261#237261 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 01, 2009
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
- George- Not the same as the MR funnel.- This catridge has dessicant c rystals in it- kind of very large off-white salt looking.- They expand un til they fill the tube, and then you replace.- Very easy to check the sta tus- it starts out as 1/4 full, and they expand to fill it.- You just tie off the string and drop it in.- Worked great, but I have no idea of the supplier or the cost.- I seem to remember they were cheap.- Maybe avail able through truck stops, or we might have got them from Jack Young and Co. in Allston, Mass.- Young was our supplier. - ------------------------- ------------------------- -- Bill Sullivan ------------------------- ------------------------- -- Windsor Locks, Ct. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
From: "George Alexander" <gtalexander(at)att.net>
Date: Apr 01, 2009
williamtsullivan(at)att.n wrote: > George- Not the same as the MR funnel. This catridge has dessicant crystals in it- kind of very large off-white salt looking. < < > > > Bill: Didn't mean to imply that it was like a Mr. Funnel from a content/chemistry standpoint.... the issue that should be considered is whether or not a fuel/oil mix going through the device affects its ability to accomplish the design purpose (separate/trap/filter the water). The quick scan that I did on the info doesn't mention fuel/oil mix..... just fuel. That's all. Just a thought. May not even be worth $.02! -------- George Alexander FS II R503 N709FS http://gtalexander.home.att.net Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237284#237284 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 01, 2009
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
- Goerge- From what I have seen, it ought to work.- The unit just sits on the bottom of the tank, absorbing water.- If it works in diesel, gas/o il shouldnb't be a problem.- I know it works with a diesel stand-pipe, so a top feed tank won't be bothered.- For a bottom feed, it wouldn't block it either.- The only questions that come to mind are if it would work wi th gas; or if it moves around enough to hit and break a stand-pipe in aircr aft service.- Maybe John H.- or somebody else who has been around a farm- has more knowledge than I do.- I can say that the units worked as advert ised, could be visually inspected, and did not bother the fuel feeds on any of the trucks or farm tractors.- This is not an in-line filter, it just lays on the bottom of the tank. - If it looks interesting to anyone, I can call my old employer and see i f they remember the source and cost. - ------------------------- ------------------------ Bi ll Sullivan ------------------------- ------------------------ Wi ndsor Locks, Ct. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 01, 2009
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
At 01:53 PM 4/1/2009, Thom Riddle wrote: > >This subject has been broached before but I thought it might be worth >noting again. Some Kolbers have been searching for a transparent >gascolator with drain valve. I found one which you can see here. > >http://www.rotaxparts.net/scripts/prodView.asp?idproduct=690 Not a small (or inexpensive) thing. A bit large for my UltraStar. A subject of current personal interest to me, since it was my friends who were badly injured in the MKIII crash last fall due to water in the fuel (the plane had no sump or gascolator). It just so happens that I'm making a simple small gascolator right now, with a clear bowl, drain valve, two inlets, and no filter (I have a separate fuel filter in the line). Once it's done I'll post more information on it. -Dana -- When you were born, you cried and the world rejoiced... Live your life so that when you die, the world cries and you rejoice. -- Cherokee saying ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 01, 2009
The best way to remove water from an aircraft fuel system is a gascolator. General aviation aircraft have been flying for better than 70 years using gascolators. I would not be anxious to try some limited use chemical way of removing water from my Kolb. I just drain the gascolator at the low point of my fuel system before each flight to check for water, as aviators have been successfully doing for decades. I most definitely would not put something in the fuel system line that could become clogged. There is no need for the gascolator to be clear either, I see the gas when it drains out, and see what comes out, again the same as a Cessna and most certified airplanes. You can get a gascolator at Aircraft Spruce for around 70 bucks. http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/appages/acsgascolator.php Make sure you order the Auto Gas compatible gasket for it if you buy it, the one that comes installed is for Avgas only and will swell with auto fuel. Thats an extra 5 bucks.... Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237295#237295 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 01, 2009
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
Dana- This gadget we have been discussing only weighs about 2 ounces, empty and dry.- Full (of water) it probably has absorbed maybe 6 ounces. - How are your friends doing? - ------------------------- ------------------------- - Bill Sullivan ------------------------- ------------------------- - Windsor Locks, Ct. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 01, 2009
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
At 05:58 PM 4/1/2009, william sullivan wrote: >Dana- This gadget we have been discussing only weighs about 2 ounces, >empty and dry. Full (of water) it probably has absorbed maybe 6 ounces. > How are your friends doing? They're OK... Bob's walking with a cane but still needs some surgery, I think, and Dave's pretty much healed. -Dana -- When you were born, you cried and the world rejoiced... Live your life so that when you die, the world cries and you rejoice. -- Cherokee saying ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 912 Question - Gas dripping from the Carbs
Date: Apr 01, 2009
From: zeprep251(at)aol.com
To all, =C2- Just a little trick for flooding problems.If a piece of debris gets s tuck in the seat and is held there by the pressure exerted on the needle by higher than normal fuel level,,just clamp off the fuel line and let the engi ne run until it is ready to quit.You can usually tell when it leans out and picks up a few RPM.Now the fuel bowl is near empty,but of more importance, t he needle has dropped clear of the seat,and by releasing the clamp, a rush o f fuel will clear the debris out of the seat and off the needle.Like Beaufor d says,worth what ye paid for it. =C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- G Aman MK-3C Jabiru 2200A Bing 64CV -----Original Message----- From: Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL <Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland.af.mil> Sent: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:43 pm Subject: Kolb-List: Re: 912 Question - Gas dripping from the Carbs Thanks to the 912 guys who responded to my question with good advice! =C2- Gary A. =93 I think you are right the likely culprit is my electric fuel pump pushing too much gas thru the carbs.=C2- I will try flying with the electric Facet =9Coff=9D and see what happens.=C2- I may also consider plumbing my auxiliary fuel pump in parall el rather than in series, like it is now. =C2- Lucien =93 Good idea to look inside the float bowls =93 see if I have any stuc k floats or bent pins. =C2- Mike B. =93 Again, good tips about a potential overpressure from the Facet pump, as well as a possible stuck float. =C2- I=99ll address each of these ideas one at a time, and report back to the List when I discover the fix. =C2- Dennis Kirby Cedar Crest, New Mexico 0 -Matt Dralle, List Admin. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ElleryWeld(at)aol.com
Date: Apr 01, 2009
Subject: Re: fuel flow meter
I put the MK3xtra on hold for a while I am about to get back into it now the guy that had my old firestar couldn't fly without getting air sick and sold it to someone else in MN and I haven't heard from him in a while but he had damaged a wing tip the last I knew I dont know if he was capable of the repair or not Ellery building Mk3Xtra In a message dated 3/31/2009 2:03:44 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, planecrazzzy(at)yahoo.com writes: --> Kolb-List message posted by: "planecrazzzy" Hey Ellery, You should be just about done with the Mark III X by now. I don't hang around here... So I haven't noticed if you've posted progress.... Don't know if you heard... But the guy you made the trade with... Can't fly... either he gets air sick.... or he got scared...Don't know. Gotta Fly... Mike & "Jaz" the Flying Dog . Building Wittman- Buttercup -------- . . . . . Do Not Archive Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237073#237073 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/leading_edges_finished_02_113.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/coating_wood_with_west_systems_02_211.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/leading_edge_19_214.jpg **************New Low Prices on Dell Laptops =93 Starting at $399 ttp:%2F%2Fad.doubl eclick.net%2Fclk%3B213540506%3B35046329%3Bx) ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Maule SFS-P8A tail wheel on Kolb...
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 02, 2009
I like the larger tailwheels, I need to do that one day, along with a bunch of other projects :) I was wondering how the larger 6 inch Aircraft Spruce tailwheel would fit on a round spring. Did drilling it out leave enough material for the tailwheel not to crack at the mount ? John H's bracing on tail is also nice, if I had the ability to weld, I would do that also. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237436#237436 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: Maule SFS-P8A tail wheel on Kolb...
Date: Apr 02, 2009
Mike, plenty of wall thickness after the resizing. I also shortened the spring rod. BB On 2, Apr 2009, at 5:31 PM, JetPilot wrote: > > I like the larger tailwheels, I need to do that one day, along with > a bunch of other projects :) I was wondering how the larger 6 > inch Aircraft Spruce tailwheel would fit on a round spring. Did > drilling it out leave enough material for the tailwheel not to > crack at the mount ? John H's bracing on tail is also nice, if I > had the ability to weld, I would do that also. > > Mike > > -------- > "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast > as you could have !!! > > Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237436#237436 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 02, 2009
From: Robert Laird <rlaird(at)cavediver.com>
Subject: Re: fuel flow meter
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 02, 2009
From: Robert Laird <rlaird(at)cavediver.com>
Subject: Re: fuel flow meter
I got a Navman 3100 fuel flow meter.... my console wasn't big enough for it, so I hand-made a box for it to go into, and put it on the "floor" of my MkIII... all the power and cables are underneath, so it's a clean installation. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 03, 2009
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
- I agree that a gascolator is a very valuable component of the fuel syst em, but I am thinking of the water held in the fuel by the alcohol in E-10. - I was wondering if a dessicant cartridge could extract the water from t he alcohol before it reached the gascolator.- Anyone know enough chemistr y to determine how much water could be absorbed by E-10 before it reaches a saturation point?- The catridge (if it works on E-10) would be a lightwe ight safety backup for a gascolator, plus has the advantage of no plumbing, visual checking for water, or a lightweight alternative for 103 weight wat chers. - ------------------------- ------------------------ Bi ll Sullivan ------------------------- ------------------------ Wi ndsor Locks, Ct. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Maule SFS-P8A tail wheel on Kolb...
From: "robcannon" <leecannon(at)telus.net>
Date: Apr 03, 2009
Mike and others - John H's bracing on tail is nice, and I believe a very good idea. If you look at the pics he posted you'll see one of someone else's plane (looks very similar to his) that shows the bracing done with flat stock aluminum, bolted at each end. I did mine this way and it was simple, and I believe a VERY good mod. cheers, Rob Cannon Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237509#237509 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 03, 2009
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
At 07:27 AM 4/3/2009, william sullivan wrote: > I agree that a gascolator is a very valuable component of the fuel > system, but I am thinking of the water held in the fuel by the alcohol in > E-10. I was wondering if a dessicant cartridge could extract the water > from the alcohol before it reached the gascolator. Anyone know enough > chemistry to determine how much water could be absorbed by E-10 before it > reaches a saturation point? The catridge (if it works on E-10) would be > a lightweight safety backup for a gascolator, plus has the advantage of > no plumbing, visual checking for water, or a lightweight alternative for > 103 weight watchers. If the water is held in solution by the ethanol it's not a major problem; it's when there's too much, or it separates out, that you have a problem with engine noise (or rather, the lack of it). I forget the exact amount that's soluble but google "olive jar test for ethanol"; it's how you test for ethanol (by adding water to a fuel sample until no more water dissolves). I'd be leery of dropping a dessicant cartridge in my fuel tank; somebody said they're made for diesel fuel, but what about gasoline? And even if they're OK with gasoline, what about ethanol or other additives? -Dana -- People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's safer to pick on rich women than biker gangs. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 03, 2009
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 04:27:25 -0700 (PDT) From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net> >.................. The cartridge (if it works on E-10) would be a lightweight safety backup for a gascolator, plus has the advantage of no plumbing, visual checking for water, or a lightweight alternative for 103 weight watchers. > Bill, The best back up is to ensure no water gets into the tank. When fuel is low in the five gallon FireFly tank, it is very easy to look in through the bung to see if there is water on the tank bottom. Also, since I refuel with 2.5 gallon plastic cans, it is very easy to do the same with them. When refueling, I never pour out the last drop into the FireFly tank. This captures all water and debris in the bottom of the refueling cans. I remove the FireFly tank in the Spring and purge out the accumulated water and debris. It is rare to get more than a dimes volume of water from the tank. I have never found any water in the Bing float bowl. Normally I do not purge the refilling cans, as I use the remaining fuel as oil slosh fuel before refilling the cans. But when I can see some build up, I will purge the refilling cans too. One must be careful when refueling from other than your own cans, etc. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 03, 2009
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
Dana- That is why I was asking.- I don't know about compatability with a gas/oil mix.- I am wondering about the supposed tendabcy of E-10 to pick up and suspend quantities of water from, say, high humidity.- Naturally, the bulk of raw water would be easy to get out of straight mo-gas with an M R filter or gascolator, but what about E-10 that already has absorbed an am ount of water.- Would the alcohol permit the water to go through the MR? - Would a dessicant draw the water from the alcohol/ water mix?- Curios ity on my part, now that straight mo-gas is not available around here any m ore. - ------------------------- ----------------------- Bill Sullivan ------------------------- ----------------------- Winds or Locks, Ct. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 03, 2009
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
At 02:00 PM 4/3/2009, william sullivan wrote: >I am wondering about the supposed tendabcy of E-10 to pick up and suspend >quantities of water from, say, high humidity. Naturally, the bulk of raw >water would be easy to get out of straight mo-gas with an MR filter or >gascolator, but what about E-10 that already has absorbed an amount of >water. Would the alcohol permit the water to go through the MR? Yes. There is a difference between a suspension and a solution. Suspension is what you have when you shake the oil and vinegar for your salad (vinegar being basically water). It mixes, sort of, but the water is still in discrete blobs and but settles back out immediately. That's what a Mr Funnel strains out. A solution is different, like stirring sugar into your tea. It dissolves (up to a point) and is no longer identifiable as separate clumps... and can't be strained out. Mix water into gas containing ethanol, and some will go into solution, up to the saturation limit. A Mr Funnel won't take it out (and I don't believe dessicant would either, but I could be wrong). Add more and it settles to the bottom (or suspension if you shake it). The Mr Funnel will take only that part of it out. -Dana -- Politicians are those who deal with the problems which would not exist if they didn't exist. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 03, 2009
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
- Dana- Now the question is whether it is possible to get some E-10 that for some reason has already absorbed say, about 95% of the water it is capa ble of soaking up.- If this will go through an MR funnel, will the gascol ator remove it?- Also, how much performance would be lost with the combin ation of 10% alcohol, plus all the water?- I am just doing a little intel lectual speculation here, I don't have anything specific in mind.- Or, po ssibly find a little insurance against water absorption in gas (E-10) store d long term in aircraft or in reserve cans.- I understand long term witho ut Sta-Bil is around 30 days, and it does seem to lose it's volitility in p ower equipment stored over a season- lawn mowers, etc. - ------------------------- ------------------------ Bi ll Sullivan ------------------------- ------------------------ Wi ndsor Locks, Ct. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
From: "Dana" <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Date: Apr 03, 2009
OK, here's my new transparent gascolator. As I've said, I don't want a large heavy expensive aircraft gascolator for my ultralight, don't want a cheap glass tractor gascolator with no drain, either, but I do want to be able to see what's inside... so I made my own (see attached picture). Basically, it's a 3" x 1.75" x 1" polycarbonate block with nylon fittings and a Saf-Air drain valve. No filter, since I also have an inline filter. It's not on the plane yet, but it's sitting on my workbench filled with gas/oil mix as a final chemical compatibility check. -Dana Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237589#237589 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/fuel_strainer_658.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 03, 2009
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
At 07:37 PM 4/3/2009, william sullivan wrote: > Dana- Now the question is whether it is possible to get some E-10 that > for some reason has already absorbed say, about 95% of the water it is > capable of soaking up. If this will go through an MR funnel, will the > gascolator remove it? No, as I said if it's in solution the Mr Funnel won't take it out, and it won't settle out in the gascolator either, unless the temperature drops (the amount that will stay in solution varies with temperature). > Also, how much performance would be lost with the combination of 10% > alcohol, plus all the water? I am just doing a little intellectual > speculation here, I don't have anything specific in mind. Or, possibly > find a little insurance against water absorption in gas (E-10) stored > long term in aircraft or in reserve cans. I understand long term without > Sta-Bil is around 30 days, and it does seem to lose it's volitility in > power equipment stored over a season- lawn mowers, etc. I don't know how much performance you'd lose, but I doubt it's that much. Re old gas, I've used old (6 months +) gas in my PPG and seen no performance difference. This only applies to gas in SEALED containers, though. My rule is, it the gas doesn't smell bad, it's OK (though I'll be draining and refilling my Kolb tanks after the winter,because the tanks AREN'T sealed (Vented). -Dana -- Q: Why is it that New Jersey got all the toxic waste dumps and California got all the lawyers? A: New Jersey had first choice. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 03, 2009
Dana That is quite a nice rendering of your gascolator, what program did you use to make that picture ? That should be great, given that you check your plastic tanks anyways, you will probably never get more than a trace of water in your system. The biggest problem is, most f us don't have the materials and ability to make a gascolator, I suppose I could build one, but it would take so much time and effort, probably days, that I am better off to spend the 80 bucks. The one from Aircraft Spruce weights only about 8 ounces, and not so big that it would look out of place on an ultralight. The important thing is that we have a gascolator. As in the case of the outside airplane, the gascolator saved a failed engine by keeping a bunch of water rather then sending it to the carbs. A gascolator is also useful for getting any small solid debris out finds its way into the lines. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237623#237623 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: russ kinne <russ(at)rkiphoto.com>
Subject: Re: Fear of Liability
Date: Apr 04, 2009
All this talk about product liability -- remember Thuman Munson ? He bought a Cessna Citation 501, and was killed in it. As I recall Cessna had to pay his estate 22 million! The Citation is a well-proven design, it certainly was NOT Cessna's fault -- but they still had to pay. The lawyers always go after the deepest pockets they can find (we should be pretty safe!) and it becomes a contest to see which side can find the hungriest lawyers. A sorry state of affairs. What's happened to our country? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mike Welch <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: non-transparent gascolator
Date: Apr 04, 2009
Mike B. Dana did a very good job building his fuel drain block. (although is isn 't quite a gascolator=2C but in his case=2C doesn't need to be) I do have the ability and the tools to copy his design=2C and have a block of aluminu m that would be perfect for such a project. But...... I went to Aircraft Spruce=2C and looked for the $80 gascolator=2C like yo u mentioned. I assume the "Usher Gascolator" is the one you were referring to. Although it would be closer to a $100=2C after you add all the fittin gs and the Saf Air drain valve=2C it still looks like a deal! This Usher Gascolator appears to be a very high quality item=2C and I can 't imagine even trying to make a fuel block=2C when you can get one of thes e for $80. I especially like the fact that it has a sediment bowl. This gascolator subject is very timely for me=2C since my engine installa tion is virtually finished=2C except for reinstalling my fuel tanks and gas colator. My fuel lines are finished=2C and are simply waiting to be slid o n and clamped tight. I will not be re-installing any of the drain system I had. I was looking for a decent gascolator system. Found one=2C thanks. BTW=2C I know there is a lot of interest in having a clear sediment bowl. But=2C to be honest=2C this isn't all that necessary. In your preflight inspection=2C you should always drain your fuel sump (whatever design it is ) into your fuel checker flask. The flask gives you all the ability you ne ed to see and remove what's coming out of the fuel lines. Being able to se e the water in the sediment bowl isn't really necessary=2C when you conside r you CAN drain it into something you can see. Mike Welch MkIII _________________________________________________________________ Rediscover Hotmail=AE: Now available on your iPhone or BlackBerry http://windowslive.com/RediscoverHotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Rediscover_ Mobile1_042009 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DAquaNut(at)aol.com
Date: Apr 04, 2009
Subject: Re: Fear of Liability
In a message dated 4/4/2009 7:54:54 A.M. Central Daylight Time, russ(at)rkiphoto.com writes: A sorry state of affairs. What's happened to our country? Can you spell GREED!!!!! **************Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make dinner for $10 or less. (http://food.aol.com/frugal-feasts?ncid=emlcntusfood00000001) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 04, 2009
From: Dave Kulp <undoctor(at)ptd.net>
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
Dana, does it make a difference (or preferable) whether the gascolator is before or after the inline filter? Dave Kulp Bethlehem, PA Firefly 098 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 04, 2009
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
At 12:41 AM 4/4/2009, JetPilot wrote: >That is quite a nice rendering of your gascolator, what program did you >use to make that picture ? That should be great, given that you check >your plastic tanks anyways, you will probably never get more than a trace >of water in your system. The biggest problem is, most f us don't have >the materials and ability to make a gascolator... The rendering was done in KeyCreator (formerly Cadkey, which I've been using for years). This one is real simple to make, at its crudest just a saw, drill press, and some drills and taps (though I admit I had a machinist friend mill the sides to get them cleaner). I actually started out intending to use a glass tube clamped between endplates with o-rings, but that required a lathe which I don't have... then I saw my friend had this bar of Lexan clamped on his Bridgeport... -Dana -- I no longer need to punish, deceive or compromise myself. Unless, of course, I want to stay employed. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: non-transparent gascolator
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 04, 2009
Mike, Glad to hear you are making good progress on rebuilding your plane, that must mean your recovery went very well also ! There are lots of good options for gascolators out there, its just important that you have one. In my MK III, I have the gascolator inside the fuselage, with just the drain sticking out the bottom of the fuselage, so I could not see it even if it was clear ! Its cool though, I have the quick drain just like a real Cessna :) I do drain into a clear glass, so if there is anything in the fuel I will see it when I drain it out. I have my gascolator before my fuel filter, that way I can see and remove large debris before it gets to the filter stage. The gascolator also has a screen in it, so large stuff would never get to the filter and get drained out. Then it goes on to the 10 micron filter that gets out even the smallest of particles. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237679#237679 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell(at)fmtcblue.com>
Subject: Re: non-transparent gascolator
Date: Apr 04, 2009
----- Original Message ----- From: Mike Welch To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 8:43 AM Subject: Kolb-List: non-transparent gascolator Mike B. Dana did a very good job building his fuel drain block. (although is isn't quite a gascolator, but in his case, doesn't need to be) I do have the ability and the tools to copy his design, and have a block of aluminum that would be perfect for such a project. But...... I find it interesting that you guys are going to all that trouble to make? or buy a gascolator, especially one that will fit in a Kolb that you can see through. I do have one that is drained out through the bottom of the plane at the fuels lowest point, (in front of the filter) from a Curtis Fuel Valve that I think cost me $16.00. A standard GA application is drained into a standard collector with a clear body. (even has a little screw driver on the end of it) Other than the cost of the valve the rest only cost perhaps $6.00 at the most. Mine has been in operation for at least two years with no problems or leaks. I got the design from one by Rev Pike, posted on the list about two years ago, It is made from 1 1/2 PVC. It takes a small piece of PVC and two caps to make the body of the gascolator, two nylon 1/4 inch barbs with one threaded end. The Curtis valve is also tapped and threaded into the bottom which in my case goes through the bottom of the plane to allow me to drain the gascolator or the fuel for that matter. The inlet and outlet are installed in the top cap. The fuel goes in the top and the water and sediment floats to the bottom of the gascolator. I have a small plate mounted on the bottom of the cage that mine is clamped to in an upright position, with the Curtis valve clamped to the bottom plate. If you don't have a handy plate on the bottom of your plane, you can install one with out too much trouble. all you would need to do is measure the distance and diameter of two of the cross tubes on the bottom. Make a plate with tabs that will fit on top of the tubes. __ __ I I I___________I They can then either be riveted to the top of if your are reluctant to drill a hole there, leave a small tab on each side that will allow you to put a small hose clamp on the tabs over the tube. You will need some taps for the nylon hose barbs and some thread sealer. Larry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 04, 2009
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
- Thank you, Henry, very informative.- For the actual amount of water i nvolved with the ethanol, the dessicant cartridge looks like a wasted effor t.- It was extremely helpful with the trucks, and also with the occassion ally used farm equipment.- With the E-10, a gascolator and MR look like t he best bet. - ------------------------- ---------------- Bill Sullivan ------------------------- ---------------- Windsor Locks, Ct. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Douglas Fly-In slideshow/video
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 04, 2009
Where have you been Crystal ? I havent seen a post from you for several weeks. Have you been flying ? I have not flow my Kolb in well over a month, every day I am in Miami, its very windy :( Today and tomorrow look perfect, and I am up north flying airplanes that aren't as much fun as my Kolb... I ran across this picture of a MK III like yours in flight, the elevator seems to be very close to she same position as yours, so its probably normal. The big wedge of the MK III Xtra tends to push the nose down a lot, so the elevator is a lot more up during flight. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237728#237728 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/kolbmkiiiinflight_178.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: K I <wrk2win4u(at)msn.com>
Subject: Kolb markll
Date: Apr 04, 2009
Hello List=2C I soon will be the owner of a Kolb Markll if everything turns out well. I h ave not owned or flown a Kolb before. I however have been impressed with th e Kolb for many years. I am on the edge of =93pulling the trigger=94=2C (finalizing the deal) on a Kolb Markll. I have some questions about the plane and the engine. Any adv ice provided by the writers of this list will be taken very seriously. First of all=2C the plane is registered and has an =93N=94 number. It was p ut in a hanger in August of 2008 and not started or flown since. The engine is a Hirth 2704 electric start single carburetor with a 3 blade prop. Acco rding to the seller=2C it has been =93hard landed=94 once. This only bent t he left wheel strut slightly. The strut has been replaced. The engine has 1 75 hours total hours. Well=2C I know I=92m asking a lot of information on a plane =93sight unseen =94. What should I look for as far as =93RED FLAGS=94=2C safety issues or p otential costly problems? Thank you for any advice provided=2C Kurt _________________________________________________________________ Rediscover Hotmail=AE: Now available on your iPhone or BlackBerry http://windowslive.com/RediscoverHotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Rediscover_ Mobile1_042009 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell(at)fmtcblue.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb markll
Date: Apr 04, 2009
The Hirth for one thing. Perhaps this engine is ok, but I have at least one friend that has been through three of them and did not ever get one that didn't set him down in the pucker brush. Not really willing to say that the engine is no good, just be very critical and get it checked out completely before you jump. Larry C ----- Original Message ----- From: K I To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 9:03 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Kolb markll Hello List, I soon will be the owner of a Kolb Markll if everything turns out well. I have not owned or flown a Kolb before. I however have been impressed with the Kolb for many years. I am on the edge of =93pulling the trigger=94, (finalizing the deal) on a Kolb Markll. I have some questions about the plane and the engine. Any advice provided by the writers of this list will be taken very seriously. First of all, the plane is registered and has an =93N=94 number. It was put in a hanger in August of 2008 and not started or flown since. The engine is a Hirth 2704 electric start single carburetor with a 3 blade prop. According to the seller, it has been =93hard landed=94 once. This only bent the left wheel strut slightly. The strut has been replaced. The engine has 175 hours total hours. Well, I know I=92m asking a lot of information on a plane =93sight unseen=94. What should I look for as far as =93RED FLAGS=94, safety issues or potential costly problems? Thank you for any advice provided, Kurt ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Rediscover Hotmail=AE: Now available on your iPhone or BlackBerry Check it out. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 04/04/09 16:53:00 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb markll
Date: Apr 04, 2009
Look at it in person before writing a check. A positive is the owner being honest enough to tell you about a hard landing. Look for any bends in the little tubes welded to the gear socket and slack fabric on that side of the cage. Look at the registration certificate and the airworthiness certificate. They should be together. Check the logbook for the most recent "condition inspection" and whether done by the owner with a repairman certificate or an A&P. Good logs are a plus. I would want to witness the engine running with at least some ( tethered) full throttle. BB MkIII, suzuki On 4, Apr 2009, at 11:03 PM, K I wrote: > Hello List, > > I soon will be the owner of a Kolb Markll if everything turns out > well. I have not owned or flown a Kolb before. I however have been > impressed with the Kolb for many years. > > I am on the edge of =93pulling the trigger=94, (finalizing the deal) on > a Kolb Markll. I have some questions about the plane and the > engine. Any advice provided by the writers of this list will be > taken very seriously. > > First of all, the plane is registered and has an =93N=94 number. It was > put in a hanger in August of 2008 and not started or flown since. > The engine is a Hirth 2704 electric start single carburetor with a > 3 blade prop. According to the seller, it has been =93hard landed=94 > once. This only bent the left wheel strut slightly. The strut has > been replaced. The engine has 175 hours total hours. > > Well, I know I=92m asking a lot of information on a plane =93sight > unseen=94. What should I look for as far as =93RED FLAGS=94, safety > issues or potential costly problems? > > > Thank you for any advice provided, > > Kurt > > > Rediscover Hotmail=AE: Now available on your iPhone or BlackBerry > Check it out. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Kolb markll
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 04, 2009
Everything I have ever heard about Hirth engines is bad, very bad !!! I personally would not buy a Hirth engine at any price. There are always good deals on MK III 's out there, how much are you looking at spending ? Maybe waiting for a MK III with a Rotax might be a better option. In all fairness, we do have a guy here on the list that flys with a Hirth and likes it. I personally think he has exceptional skills that most others do not have to have kept that engine running good, and maybe a bit of luck also ;) The Kolb is a great airplane, but make sure you get the right one. Don't rush into getting an airplane that you will not be able to fly due to a poor engine choice. Even a Kolb will not fly without a good engine. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237780#237780 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Maule SFS-P8A tail wheel on Kolb...
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 04, 2009
Rob, Can you post pictures of yours !!! I think I get the idea, but I would like to see exactly what you did. This is a good mod I would like to do sooner rather than later. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237782#237782 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wandering Wench is on her way
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 04, 2009
Be sure to click on the " Blog " link, Arty has a very good day to day narrative of her flight along with pictures. I find myself looking at this every day ! Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237783#237783 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 05, 2009
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb markll
Let the engine warm up (cylinder head temps) before doing any full throttle runs. jerb At 10:51 PM 4/4/2009, you wrote: >Look at it in person before writing a check. A >positive is the owner being honest enough to tell you >about a hard landing. Look for any bends in the >little tubes welded to the gear socket and slack fabric >on that side of the cage. >Look at the registration certificate and the >airworthiness certificate. They should be together. >Check the logbook for the most recent "condition >inspection" and whether done by the owner with >a repairman certificate or an A&P. Good logs are a plus. > >I would want to witness the engine running with >at least some ( tethered) full throttle. >BB >MkIII, suzuki > >On 4, Apr 2009, at 11:03 PM, K I wrote: > >>Hello List, >> >>I soon will be the owner of a Kolb Markll if >>everything turns out well. I have not owned or >>flown a Kolb before. I however have been >>impressed with the Kolb for many years. >> >>I am on the edge of pulling the trigger, >>(finalizing the deal) on a Kolb Markll. I have >>some questions about the plane and the engine. >>Any advice provided by the writers of this list will be taken very seriously. >> >>First of all, the plane is registered and has >>an N number. It was put in a hanger in August >>of 2008 and not started or flown since. The >>engine is a Hirth 2704 electric start single >>carburetor with a 3 blade prop. According to >>the seller, it has been hard landed once. >>This only bent the left wheel strut slightly. >>The strut has been replaced. The engine has 175 hours total hours. >> >>Well, I know Im asking a lot of information on >>a plane sight unseen. What should I look for >>as far as RED FLAGS, safety issues or potential costly problems? >> >> >>Thank you for any advice provided, >> >>Kurt >> >> >> >> >>---------- >>Rediscover Hotmail: Now available on your >>iPhone or BlackBerry >><http://windowslive.com/RediscoverHotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Rediscover_Mobile1_042009>Check >>it out. >> >> >><http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List >><http://www.matronics.com/contribution>http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> ________________________________________________________________________________
From: russ kinne <russ(at)rkiphoto.com>
Subject: Re: Wandering Wench is on her way
Date: Apr 05, 2009
Mike Where do I find Arty's "blog link"? I'm on her website but don't see it Thanx On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:01 AM, JetPilot wrote: > > Be sure to click on the " Blog " link, Arty has a very good day to > day narrative of her flight along with pictures. I find myself > looking at this every day ! > > Mike > > -------- > "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast > as you could have !!! > > Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237783#237783 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Kolb markll
From: "Thom Riddle" <riddletr(at)gmail.com>
Date: Apr 05, 2009
I've never built a complete airplane but have bought many used experimental airplanes. If it is being sold as a flying airplane, I always insist on the seller flying it for me. Many times I've even insisted on the seller flying it to my airport for delivery, with me paying his out-of-pocket expenses. If s/he won't at least fly the airplane in my presence then I walk away. If it is a repair project that is a completely different scenario and it should be priced as such. If you land hard enough to bend a leg there is a fair chance there is other hidden damage. If it is not flyable with the bent leg, offer to pay for a new one if he'll fly it with the new leg. If you buy the airplane you are going to have to buy a new gear leg anyway. If he balks at that, I'd walk away. If you are not confident of the older Hirth engines make allowance for a replacement engine in your pricing or ask him to sell it without the engine at a price that will allow you to buy an engine in which you have confidence. -------- Thom Riddle Buffalo, NY http://riddletr.googlepages.com/sportpilot-cfi http://riddletr.googlepages.com/a%26pmechanix A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works. - John Gaule Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237796#237796 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 05, 2009
Subject: Re: Kolb markll
From: Richard Girard <aslsa.rng(at)gmail.com>
Hirth's use a flat belt to drive the fan. Make sure it hasn't flipped. One side of the belt has a rubber coating, the other side is braid. The braid side no run the fan so good. It's a 50 cent shim to fix it, but a bearcat t o do the first time. If you find the belt flipped, it's almost certain the engine has been over heated. Rick On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 10:03 PM, K I wrote: > Hello List, > > > I soon will be the owner of a Kolb Markll if everything turns out well. > I have not owned or flown a Kolb before. I however have been impressed wi th > the Kolb for many years. > > > I am on the edge of =93pulling the trigger=94, (finalizing the deal) on a Kolb > Markll. I have some questions about the plane and the engine. Any advice > provided by the writers of this list will be taken very seriously. > > > First of all, the plane is registered and has an =93N=94 number. It was p ut in > a hanger in August of 2008 and not started or flown since. The engine is a > Hirth 2704 electric start single carburetor with a 3 blade prop. Accordin g > to the seller, it has been =93hard landed=94 once. This only bent the lef t wheel > strut slightly. The strut has been replaced. The engine has 175 hours tot al > hours. > > > Well, I know I=92m asking a lot of information on a plane =93sight unseen =94. > What should I look for as far as =93RED FLAGS=94, safety issues or potent ial > costly problems? > > > Thank you for any advice provided, > > > Kurt > > > ------------------------------ > Rediscover Hotmail=AE: Now available on your iPhone or BlackBerry Check i t > out.<http://windowslive.com/RediscoverHotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Redi scover_Mobile1_042009> > =========== =========== =========== =========== > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Kolb markll
From: "ces308" <ces308(at)ldaco.com>
Date: Apr 05, 2009
Make sure there are no kinks in the tail boom...inspect the whole length. chris ambrose m3x/jab Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237798#237798 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wandering Wench is on her way
From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs(at)elltel.net>
Date: Apr 05, 2009
Here's the direct link to Arty's blog. http://www.lessonsfromtheedge.com/b2evolution/blog1.php -------- Tom Jones Classic IV 503 Rotax, 72 inch Two blade Warp Ellensburg, WA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237806#237806 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 05, 2009
From: herb <herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb markll
Buy it without the Hirth and get yourself a Rotax....they never have problems...:-) No one has reported a seizure for several weeks now...:-) Herb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 05, 2009
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: non-transparent gascolator
At 10:43 AM 4/4/2009, Mike Welch wrote: > I went to Aircraft Spruce, and looked for the $80 gascolator, like you > mentioned. I assume the "Usher Gascolator" is the one you were referring > to. Although it would be closer to a $100, after you add all the > fittings and the Saf Air drain valve, it still looks like a deal...I know > there is a lot of interest in having a clear sediment bowl. But, to be > honest, this isn't all that necessary. In your preflight inspection, you > should always drain your fuel sump (whatever design it is) into your fuel > checker flask... If I was flying a larger plane like the MKIII's most of you guys fly, I'd agree. I always had a drain cup in my T-Craft. But my UltraStar has no cockpit at all, not even a pod, so I need to limit what I carry around, and being Part 103, I also need to minimize the weight. Besides, I just like making things... -Dana -- Sometimes you're the windshield, sometimes you're the bug. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Any suggestions for sticking altimeter?
From: "John Bickham" <gearbender(at)bellsouth.net>
Date: Apr 05, 2009
Hello folks, Was wondering if anyone has any suggestions for a sticking altimeter? I know the obvious suggestion is buy a new one. Probably will do that. It is sticking around 500 ft. That is kinda where I spend a lot of time. Must have wore the mechanism out there. It will come unstuck with a few taps or with enough gain in altitude. We stay in a very humid and wet environment. I think the guts have rusted or something. Just wondering if there are I tricks out there for this? Looking at AS&S for new altimeter. Trying to work on squawk list for MV. Yesterday, flew 2.3 hours with 9 cross wind landings (15 knots) to build up my wind threshold for the trip out west. Trying to get ready. Appreciate any help or suggestions. Stay safe. -------- Thanks too much, John Bickham Mark III-C w/ 912UL St. Francisville, LA Landing a plane and being married - a few smooth moments mixed with a lot of rough ones. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237826#237826 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 05, 2009
From: Lanny Fetterman <donaho1(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Harsh words about Rotax
Hi all, I don`t want to start a peeing match here, however, I have flown with two different Rotax engines and had good luck with both of them. I have a 503 now that hasn`t given be any problems at all. Granted it only has 60 hours on it but it has never skipped a beat. I put over 100 hours on a used 377 (total hours around 250) and it never had a problem, except on one flight when the diaphragm flapper in the fuel pump went bad. I don`t blame that on the engine! I`m not saying they are bulletproof. Perhaps some day I will have a different opinion. Would I fly a four stroke if I could? Sure I would, but as of now I am happy with their two stroke reliability. Just wondering Herb, have you ever owned a Rotax. If so, what happened that soured you on them? Lanny Fetterman FSII N598LF ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mike Welch <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Any suggestions for sticking altimeter?
Date: Apr 05, 2009
John. If I had a sticky altimeter needle=2C here's what I'd do. First=2C lay o ut a clean towel for a spotless work area. Wash your hands real good=2C to get rid of any skin oils. Round up your itty bitty screwdriver set=2C and remove the front bezel and glass. Continue removing the (2) screws that h old the inner parts inside the housing. Remove the inner parts. It comes out as an assembly. Put one (1) drop of mineral oil on the needle swinging point. (you might have better access to this location from the rear of the dial face.) While you have the gauge apart=2C carefully=2C very lightly blow any dust that ma y have gotten into the bellows and gear mechanism. Get some Windex glass cleaner=2C and thoroughly clean the inside and outs ide of the front glass. Reassemble. The insides of the altimeter are very sensitive to ham hands. We're talk ing toothpicks=2C and Qtips=2C and a super light touch. That drop of oil s hould really help with the needle swinging action. It MAY not hurt to put a teensy bit of oil on the gears that go between the needle and the bellows .....you'll see what I mean. Hope this helps. BTW=2C thanks again for the gear leg measurements. One of the best mods I did to my MkIII. Mike Welch MkIII > Subject: Kolb-List: Any suggestions for sticking altimeter? > From: gearbender(at)bellsouth.net > Date: Sun=2C 5 Apr 2009 10:16:39 -0700 > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > > > > Hello folks=2C > > Was wondering if anyone has any suggestions for a sticking altimeter? I k now the obvious suggestion is buy a new one. Probably will do that. It is s ticking around 500 ft. That is kinda where I spend a lot of time. Must have wore the mechanism out there. It will come unstuck with a few taps or with enough gain in altitude. > > We stay in a very humid and wet environment. I think the guts have rusted or something. > > Just wondering if there are I tricks out there for this? > > Looking at AS&S for new altimeter. Trying to work on squawk list for MV. Yesterday=2C flew 2.3 hours with 9 cross wind landings (15 knots) to build up my wind threshold for the trip out west. Trying to get ready. > > Appreciate any help or suggestions. Stay safe. > > -------- > Thanks too much=2C > > John Bickham > Mark III-C w/ 912UL > St. Francisville=2C LA > > Landing a plane and being married - a few smooth moments mixed with a lot of rough ones. > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237826#237826 > > > > > > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > > _________________________________________________________________ Quick access to your favorite MSN content and Windows Live with Internet Ex plorer 8. http://ie8.msn.com/microsoft/internet-explorer-8/en-us/ie8.aspx?ocid=B037 MSN55C0701A ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Any suggestions for sticking altimeter?
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 05, 2009
John Bickham wrote: > Hello folks, > > Was wondering if anyone has any suggestions for a sticking altimeter? I know the obvious suggestion is buy a new one. Probably will do that. It is sticking around 500 ft. That is kinda where I spend a lot of time. Must have wore the mechanism out there. It will come unstuck with a few taps or with enough gain in altitude. > > We stay in a very humid and wet environment. I think the guts have rusted or something. > > Just wondering if there are I tricks out there for this? > > Looking at AS&S for new altimeter. Trying to work on squawk list for MV. Yesterday, flew 2.3 hours with 9 cross wind landings (15 knots) to build up my wind threshold for the trip out west. Trying to get ready. > > Appreciate any help or suggestions. Stay safe. Only trick I know of for that climate is to get out of there, at least 1500 north and west....... I lived in central TX for 30 years and my health and mental state are significantly improved having left there for northern NM (and no rust/mold all over the plane) a couple years ago. Took me long enough I suppose....... As for the alt., yeah once they start to stick or give the wobbly needle syndrome, you're better off simply replacing it. That does indicate the mechanism is worn. Vibration is what does them in, if you can isolate it somehow during mounting they'll last a fair bit longer.... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237852#237852 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell(at)fmtcblue.com>
Subject: Re: Any suggestions for sticking altimeter?
Date: Apr 05, 2009
----- Original Message ----- From: John Bickham To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 11:16 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Any suggestions for sticking altimeter? Hello folks, Was wondering if anyone has any suggestions for a sticking altimeter? I know the obvious suggestion is buy a new one. Probably will do that. It is sticking around 500 ft. That is kinda where I spend a lot of time. Must have wore the mechanism out there. It will come unstuck with a few taps or with enough gain in altitude. John, I can assure you that if you come out here you will be operating in an area of your altimeter that does not have a groove worn in it. Larry C ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 05, 2009
From: herb <herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Subject: Re: Harsh words about Rotax
Lanny Not soured...I flew a 532 on my Kolb MkIII some years ago...no problems...currently fly a 447 on my Firefly..no problems..:-) I think that Hirth is getting a bad rap...that is all...Herb At 12:33 PM 4/5/2009, you wrote: > >Hi all, I don`t want to start a peeing match here, however, I have >flown with two different Rotax engines and had good luck with both >of them. I have a 503 now that hasn`t given be any problems at all. >Granted it only has 60 hours on it but it has never skipped a beat. >I put over 100 hours on a used 377 (total hours around 250) and it >never had a problem, except on one flight when the diaphragm flapper >in the fuel pump went bad. I don`t blame that on the engine! I`m not >saying they are bulletproof. Perhaps some day I will have a >different opinion. Would I fly a four stroke if I could? Sure I >would, but as of now I am happy with their two stroke >reliability. Just wondering Herb, have you ever owned a Rotax. If >so, what happened that soured you on them? Lanny Fetterman FSII N598LF > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Kolb markll
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Apr 05, 2009
wrk2win4u(at)msn.com wrote: > Isoon will be the owner of a KolbMarkll if everything turns out well. Ihave not owned or flown a Kolb before. I however have been impressed with the Kolb for many years. > You must want a two-seater if you are looking at a Mark II. Be sure to look at the weight and balance that he has and considering your weight (and gas and other things you take up that may add weight) and see how much of a passenger you are going to be able to take up if you plan to do that. Also you may want to sit in the passenger seat on the Mark II and feel what a tiny seat it is. If it is like mine, you will not be able to take a large second passenger up in the Mark II. If you want to take up other good size adults you will want to be looking at a Mark III instead of the Mark II. Please DO get training in a Kolb before trying to fly it yourself [Exclamation] -------- Cristal Waters Kolb Mark II Twinstar Rotax 503 DCSI Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237907#237907 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Douglas Fly-In slideshow/video
From: "cristalclear13" <cristalclearwaters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Apr 05, 2009
JetPilot wrote: > Where have you been Crystal ? I havent seen a post from you for several weeks. Have you been flying ? I have not flow my Kolb in well over a month, every day I am in Miami, its very windy :( Today and tomorrow look perfect, and I am up north flying airplanes that aren't as much fun as my Kolb... > > I ran across this picture of a MK III like yours in flight, the elevator seems to be very close to she same position as yours, so its probably normal. The big wedge of the MK III Xtra tends to push the nose down a lot, so the elevator is a lot more up during flight. > > Mike Thanks Mike. John Hauck said he had one that flew like that. I just got back from taking the Rotax 2 stroke maintenance class at South Mississippi Light Aircraft. I learned a lot and really enjoyed it. Ronnie Smith is a great instructor. He checks to make sure you understand before he moves on. All the storms made for an "interesting" drive to MS and back. On the way home I was wondering if I was going to make it home since several roads I tried to get home on were closed due to rivers flooding over the roads. I finally found a road that would get me home. The sheriff was parked on that bridge watching and waiting as the river was creeping up so close to it also. It gave a whole new meaning to the saying I've heard...Lord willing and the creek don't rise. When I got to Ronnie Smith's in MS I camped out by Ronnie's hanger and it was a gorgeous sunset every evening. I've attached a couple pictures here (taken with my cell). On the way to MS I stopped by and saw Jim and John Hauck's camping hideaway...it's in the sticks. That's why you haven't heard from them either. No internet out there, barely any cell phone coverage. Jim is going to help me with my muffler. Thanks Jim! :) Before that I was working like a dog trying to get ahead on my work so I could take some time off from work for the class and spring break. -------- Cristal Waters Kolb Mark II Twinstar Rotax 503 DCSI Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237913#237913 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/camping_at_class_394.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/sunset_in_lucedale_ms_161.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Maule SFS-P8A tail wheel on Kolb...
From: "robcannon" <leecannon(at)telus.net>
Date: Apr 05, 2009
Mike - sorry it took me a while, Rob Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237933#237933 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/plane_stuff_005_139.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 06, 2009
From: bczygan(at)yahoo.com
Subject: Yahoo! Auto Response
Hi Friend, How are you doing recently? I would like to introduce you a very good company which I know. Their website is *www.myehomebuy*They can offer you all kinds of Electronic products like laptops, gps,TV LCD,cell phones,ps3,MP3/4, etc........Please take some time to have a check, There must have something you'd like to buy. Their contact email: myehomebuy_service(at)188.com MSN: myehomebuy-easylife(at)hotmail.com Hope you have a good mood in shopping from their company! Best Regards Julie! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 06, 2009
From: chris davis <capedavis(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: saws
Anybody ever used a chop saw for cutting- aluminum tubing or- is there a reason against it ? Thanks Chris=0A=0A=0A ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 06, 2009
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: saws
- Chris-- I never used a chop saw for it, but I have used a table saw w ith a carbide blade.- Very noisy and dangerous- chips flying, and the pie ce can grab.- I use the miter guide and go through very slowly.- Hang o n tight.- The chop saw should work, but be very careful- full face shield , ear plugs, and hang on to the part.- Any chips with the table saw go qu ite a ways, too. - ------------------------- ------------------------- -- Bill Sullivan ------------------------- ------------------------- -- Windsor Locks, Ct. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mike Welch <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Saws, or more specifically, cutting aluminum
Date: Apr 06, 2009
Chris=2C Using a miter saw with a "toothed" blade is more than scary=2C it's the k ind of thing that makes statistics. There is absolutely no SAFE way to do it. The problem is the way the saw blade's teeth want to grab the edge of the tubing once you've managed to break into the inner walls. You CAN use the chop saw=2C but you have to use the carborundum blade=2C made especially for cutting metal. These blades are completely circular=2C and do not "catch" and shred the tube=2C like a toothed blade will. My preference for cutting aluminum tubing is my Makita hand grinder=2C wi th the 1/16" thick "cut off disc. This is relatively safe=2C and very fast =2C when compared to a hack saw or jigsaw. The cheapo discs last very little. The brand name discs last a long time. You WILL get what you pay for!!! (Harbor Freight sells 10-packs for a few bucks. For the same price=2C you can buy 3 decent brand name discs that w ill outlast the 10-pack.) Since we are on the subject of cutting metal=2C never=2C never=2C never ( !!!) cut this stuff without ear protection. Take it from a deaf basturd=2C who's listened to Skil Saws whine for decades=2C these tools will take the ir toll on your hearing!! My hearing is about 40% of what is was when I wa s younger. While we are at it. Eye protection. Same as hearing!!!!! Never cut an y metal without decent eye protection. Last year=2C I had to go to an eye doctor=2C and have a metal sliver removed from my eyeball!! After 3+ weeks of the agony=2C I faced the music and got it removed. I was hoping it wou ld come out on it's own........nope! (I had to this 35 years ago=2C but it was a wood splinter back then.) I thought my glasses were good enough. They weren't. Here on the Kolb list=2C we want to always use protection!! Mike Welch MkIII _________________________________________________________________ Rediscover Hotmail=AE: Get quick friend updates right in your inbox. http://windowslive.com/RediscoverHotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Rediscover_ Updates1_042009 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 912 ULS starter
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 06, 2009
I have an 18 Amp Hour battery in my Kolb that has been starting my 912-S for 3 years without a problem. I live in Florida, so I cant tell you weather it would work in cold weather or not. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237989#237989 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom Longo" <tlongo(at)tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: Saws, or more specifically, cutting aluminum
Date: Apr 06, 2009
Put a plywood (fine tooth) blade in backwards and it works great for that. -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Mike Welch Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 12:24 PM To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Kolb-List: Saws, or more specifically, cutting aluminum Chris, Using a miter saw with a "toothed" blade is more than scary, it's the kind of thing that makes statistics. There is absolutely no SAFE way to do it. The problem is the way the saw blade's teeth want to grab the edge of the tubing once you've managed to break into the inner walls. You CAN use the chop saw, but you have to use the carborundum blade, made especially for cutting metal. These blades are completely circular, and do not "catch" and shred the tube, like a toothed blade will. My preference for cutting aluminum tubing is my Makita hand grinder, with the 1/16" thick "cut off disc. This is relatively safe, and very fast, when compared to a hack saw or jigsaw. The cheapo discs last very little. The brand name discs last a long time. You WILL get what you pay for!!! (Harbor Freight sells 10-packs for a few bucks. For the same price, you can buy 3 decent brand name discs that will outlast the 10-pack.) Since we are on the subject of cutting metal, never, never, never (!!!) cut this stuff without ear protection. Take it from a deaf basturd, who's listened to Skil Saws whine for decades, these tools will take their toll on your hearing!! My hearing is about 40% of what is was when I was younger. While we are at it. Eye protection. Same as hearing!!!!! Never cut any metal without decent eye protection. Last year, I had to go to an eye doctor, and have a metal sliver removed from my eyeball!! After 3+ weeks of the agony, I faced the music and got it removed. I was hoping it would come out on it's own........nope! (I had to this 35 years ago, but it was a wood splinter back then.) I thought my glasses were good enough. They weren't. Here on the Kolb list, we want to always use protection!! Mike Welch MkIII ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Rediscover Hotmail: Get quick friend updates right in your inbox. Check it out. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- We are a community of 6 million users fighting spam. The Professional version does not have this message. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Yahoo! Auto Response
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 06, 2009
Can they offer me an EIS for my Rotax ??? -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=237992#237992 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 06, 2009
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: saws
At 11:11 AM 4/6/2009, chris davis wrote: >Anybody ever used a chop saw for cutting aluminum tubing or is there a >reason against it ? Thanks Chris I did a lot of aluminum (tube and sheet) with my radial arm saw a couple of years ago. I bought a blade specifically made for light metals and plastic, which is used with stick wax. Messy and the metal you're cutting gets REAL hot, but it works. You do need to push the saw into the work rather than pulling it as you typically do with wood. -Dana -- This is a test of the emergency tagline system. Were this an actual tagline, you would see amusing mottos, disclaimers, a zillion net addresses, or edifying philisophical statements. This is only a test. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: saws
Date: Apr 06, 2009
From: zeprep251(at)aol.com
A small band saw worked well for me,used a very fine tooth blade.at fast speed. -----Original Message----- From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net> Sent: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 12:58 pm Subject: Re: Kolb-List: saws At 11:11 AM 4/6/2009, chris davis wrote: Anybody ever used a chop saw for cutting? aluminum tubing or? is there a reason against it ? Thanks Chris I did a lot of aluminum (tube and sheet) with my radial arm saw a couple of years ago.? I bought a blade specifically made for light metals and plastic, which is used with stick wax.? Messy and the metal you're cutting gets REAL hot, but it works.? You do need to push the saw into the work rather than pulling it as you typically do with wood. -Dana -- ?This is a test of the emergency tagline system.? Were this an actual tagline, you would see amusing mottos, disclaimers, a zillion net addresses, or edifying philisophical statements.? This is only a test. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Souder" <flykolb(at)pa.net>
Subject: saws
Date: Apr 06, 2009
Chris, Using a powered miterbox saw was all we ever used at Old Kolb for cutting aluminum tubing of all sizes . and tons of 5/16 x 035 for ribs. We used a carbide blade with the most teeth per inch available. I like to wear a leather glove on my left hand which did the tube holding chore. Never had a problem - not to say you couldn't. Of course, cut slowly and wear goggles as chips do fly everywhere. I don't argue with those who think it too dangerous - but it has worked for us. Dennis _____ From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of chris davis Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 11:12 AM Subject: Kolb-List: saws Anybody ever used a chop saw for cutting aluminum tubing or is there a reason against it ? Thanks Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "George Myers" <gmyers(at)grandecom.net>
Subject: Saws, or more specifically, cutting aluminum
Date: Apr 06, 2009
Actually if you turn the blade around backwards it cuts all manner of metal like butter. Use any old blade. Max Nix. From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mike Welch Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 11:24 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Saws, or more specifically, cutting aluminum Chris, Using a miter saw with a "toothed" blade is more than scary, it's the kind of thing that makes statistics. There is absolutely no SAFE way to do it. The problem is the way the saw blade's teeth want to grab the edge of the tubing once you've managed to break into the inner walls. You CAN use the chop saw, but you have to use the carborundum blade, made especially for cutting metal. These blades are completely circular, and do not "catch" and shred the tube, like a toothed blade will. My preference for cutting aluminum tubing is my Makita hand grinder, with the 1/16" thick "cut off disc. This is relatively safe, and very fast, when compared to a hack saw or jigsaw. The cheapo discs last very little. The brand name discs last a long time. You WILL get what you pay for!!! (Harbor Freight sells 10-packs for a few bucks. For the same price, you can buy 3 decent brand name discs that will outlast the 10-pack.) Since we are on the subject of cutting metal, never, never, never (!!!) cut this stuff without ear protection. Take it from a deaf basturd, who's listened to Skil Saws whine for decades, these tools will take their toll on your hearing!! My hearing is about 40% of what is was when I was younger. While we are at it. Eye protection. Same as hearing!!!!! Never cut any metal without decent eye protection. Last year, I had to go to an eye doctor, and have a metal sliver removed from my eyeball!! After 3+ weeks of the agony, I faced the music and got it removed. I was hoping it would come out on it's own........nope! (I had to this 35 years ago, but it was a wood splinter back then.) I thought my glasses were good enough. They weren't. Here on the Kolb list, we want to always use protection!! Mike Welch MkIII _____ Rediscover HotmailR: Get quick friend updates right in your inbox. Check it out. <http://windowslive.com/RediscoverHotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Rediscover_Up dates1_042009> ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "b young" <by0ung(at)brigham.net>
Subject: Re: 912 ULS starter
Date: Apr 06, 2009
I have an 18 Amp Hour battery in my Kolb that has been starting my 912-S for 3 years without a problem. I live in Florida, so I cant tell you weather it would work in cold weather or not. Mike >>>>>>>>>>>>>. I have a 18 amp hour that starts the 912 in 20 deg temps. Boyd ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 06, 2009
From: "dshepherd" <cen23954(at)centurytel.net>
Subject: Re: saws
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 06, 2009
From: chris davis <capedavis(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: saws
Thank you guys for your responce to my Saws question ! Iwent to sears today and looked at the mitersaws and knowing myself I bought a new 10 inch band saw it was about the same price and I have experence with a band saw and k now that you can cut yourself with one and back out mayme loosing a finger but with a chopsaw I can see me "in the condition Im in and as halfassed as -I am I might just chop off my whole hand . so thats why I bought the ban d saw . I will let you know how it goes Thank Chris=0A=0A=0A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Vic" <vicsv(at)myfairpoint.net>
Subject: Re: saws
Date: Apr 06, 2009
Chris, Use a nonferrous blade, cut on the pull stroke, hold it firmly or clamped and make sure you use a backing board. A glove would'nt hurt incase you forget one of these suggestions. Alway use a firm slow cut. I cut from 5/16 tube to 3" angle, did the whole plane. You can even use a bandsaw- with cut oil. Tiny stuff is most unstable. Vic Ex carpenter 30Yrs ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob" <rcarillon(at)neo.rr.com>
Subject: Super LED Light
Date: Apr 06, 2009
To anyone considering strobes for their Kolb you may want to look at Whelens new Vertex Super-LED Light. We had a rep at my work last week and he showed us these new super LED lights and they were definitely bright. All self contained and very low current draw as you would expect from LEDs. You can choose from multiple flash patterns just by momentarily touching one wire to B+ to cycle through the different flash patterns. These look like they could be perfect wing tip strobes.You can buy a chrome bezel to go around the light which finishes them off nicely. You can check them out at whelen.com just to the right of the new product arrow. Bob ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 07, 2009
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Transparent gascolator with drain valve
At 11:55 AM 4/4/2009, Dave Kulp wrote: >Dana, does it make a difference (or preferable) whether the gascolator is >before or after the inline filter? I'm putting it before the inline filter, so that if it _does_ trap any sediment, I'll see it. Also I'm adding a coarse (170 micron) screen to the gascolator outlet to catch any large debris before it gets to the primary filter. -Dana -- Remember when a trojan was a warrior? ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Bent Gear Legs and Hidden Damage
From: "Thom Riddle" <riddletr(at)gmail.com>
Date: Apr 07, 2009
Dennis, You are absolutely correct.... if the gear legs are standard Kolb aluminum, but if they are heat treated 4130 tubing, not necessarily so. I don't recall if the original post even said which type of gear leg was on the subject Kolb. -------- Thom Riddle Buffalo, NY http://riddletr.googlepages.com/sportpilot-cfi http://riddletr.googlepages.com/a%26pmechanix A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works. - John Gaule Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=238130#238130 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Souder" <flykolb(at)pa.net>
Subject: Re: Bent Gear Legs and Hidden Damage
Date: Apr 07, 2009
There is only one caveat to add to these basically correct observations. The standard aluminum gear leg must fully insert into the A-frame tubing. If a gear leg is too short or not correctly inserted. If, for what ever reason, the end of the gear leg is not fully inserted, it could bend the A-frame tube. This has happened with some FireStars where the end of the alum leg was only about halfway inserted into the frame tube. I, like, Dennis Kirby, once landed a TwinStar so hard that it bent both gear legs up to where the wheels hardly touched the ground. It was a beautifully flying evening and I think I must have been daydreaming about something else and not paying attention to my flying chores; all of a sudden I saw the horizon moving very quickly upward. I added full throttle instantly, but too late and I hit the ground very hard - but not hard enough to stick. I bounced back into the air and was flying again with both gear bent way up. I did a "belly" landing and all was well except the gear legs and my pride. I didn't add the worst part yet: I was taking a bunch of kids for rides that evening and this was the last. I had a 6 year old girl with me. The father - a jet fighter pilot was watching the whole thing. He was very gracious and praised my "wheels up" landing. But I was absolutely blown away by my inattention and carelessness, esp given the payload I had aboard. Too old too soon -too smart to late Dennis -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Thom Riddle Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 8:31 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Bent Gear Legs and Hidden Damage Dennis, You are absolutely correct.... if the gear legs are standard Kolb aluminum, but if they are heat treated 4130 tubing, not necessarily so. I don't recall if the original post even said which type of gear leg was on the subject Kolb. -------- Thom Riddle Buffalo, NY http://riddletr.googlepages.com/sportpilot-cfi http://riddletr.googlepages.com/a%26pmechanix A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works. - John Gaule Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=238130#238130 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Bent Gear Legs and Hidden Damage
Date: Apr 07, 2009
> I, like, Dennis Kirby, once landed a TwinStar so hard that it bent both gear > legs up to where the wheels hardly touched the ground. > > Too old too soon -too smart to late Dennis First time I heard about that one, Dennis. ;-) Reminded me of a bad landing on Grand Island, NY, 1988, in my Fire Star. Back then they were Fire Stars, not original Fire Stars. Plans called for gear legs to be inserted half way into the sockets, secured by a 1/4" bolt. After flying over Niagra Falls for the first time, had already flown across Grand Island and was half way across the Niagra River north of Buffalo, NY, when a fine wire NGK plug electrode seperated, all but shutting down the 447 completely. Wind favored returning to Grand Island, and away I went, mostly down. Was setting up to land on the Interstate Highway right of way, but changed my mind, too late, and tried to put it across the fence off the right of way. Got behind on my flying chores, stalled it high, got a serious case of "Kolb Quit", bent both gear legs (had 1" X .090" heat treated 4130 legs), the left left shearing the gear leg socket. Had I remained totally focused on the first place I picked out, the forced landing would have been successful, I could have changed spark plugs, and been on my way. Wish I had. ;-) john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Sun and Fun 2009
Date: Apr 07, 2009
Morning Gang: Sun and Fun 2009 is two weeks away. Had about decided not to fly down, but got up this morning and decided I would like to fly down and sleep under the stars a few nights. Mainly, I'm looking forward to spending time with Travis and Dennis, and all my old friends from previous flyins. Hope the weather will be great for the entire week. I have not flown much since last September. Doesn't take long for me to get rusty. It is about a 5 hour flight one way. This will help me confirm what I need to do to get ready for my flight to Monument Valley in May. The more one does it, the better they get at it. One wants to travel as light as possible, but have everything one needs to make the flight comfortable. See you all at Lakeland. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WhiskeyVictor36(at)aol.com
Date: Apr 07, 2009
Subject: Re: Bent Gear Legs and Hidden Damage
In a message dated 4/7/2009 9:30:00 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, flykolb(at)pa.net writes: Too old too soon -too smart to late Dennis Hi Dennis, I was born and raised close to the Pennsylvania Dutch Land area (Cochranville, PA), but now live in South Jersey. I always heard it said as: To soon oldt, to late schmart. Either way it is so true! Bill Varnes Original Kolb FireStar Audubon NJ Do Not Archive **************Worried about job security? Check out the 5 safest jobs in a recession. (http://jobs.aol.com/gallery/growing-job-industries?ncid=emlcntuscare00000003) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "mccarthy" <mccarthy(at)jefnet.com>
Subject: MV-09 Dreaming-Flight planning- maybe just dreaming
Date: Apr 07, 2009
I'm a long time reader of the list, and would love to fly out to MV to meet the group, and see the area, but have way too many hurdles to jump to be possible. I live 70 miles south of Oshkosh, WI, have no "real" cross country time, no mountain experience, and a very unpredictable work schedule. I have a original Firestar, but just for flying around the area, and have a Zenith 601HD 912ul for getting around. The Zenith cruises just fine between 80-100MPH, with a 3 hour duration, but can't land where a Kolb can. First off, for flight planning, should I would fly to Albuquerque and then up to MV to avoid the higher elevations? Secondly, is anyone from the upper Midwest considering this trip? I believe there is courage, knowledge, and strength in numbers. In summary, this will probably just have to stay on my wish list, but I am one of those who enjoys the planning as much as the trip. Tom McCarthy Firestar N441TM Zenith 601HD N514TM ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: MV-09 Dreaming-Flight planning- maybe just dreaming
Date: Apr 07, 2009
> I'm a long time reader of the list, and would love to fly out to MV to > meet > the group, and see the area, but have way too many hurdles to jump to be > possible. I live 70 miles south of Oshkosh, WI, have no "real" cross > country time, no mountain experience, and a very unpredictable work > schedule. I have a original Firestar, but just for flying around the > area, > and have a Zenith 601HD 912ul for getting around. The Zenith cruises just > fine between 80-100MPH, with a 3 hour duration, but can't land where a > Kolb > can. > First off, for flight planning, should I would fly to Albuquerque and then > up to MV to avoid the higher elevations? Secondly, is anyone from the > upper > Midwest considering this trip? I believe there is courage, knowledge, and > strength in numbers. > In summary, this will probably just have to stay on my wish list, but I am > one of those who enjoys the planning as much as the trip. > > Tom McCarthy > Firestar N441TM > Zenith 601HD N514TM Tom Mc: It's about 1200 statute miles from your home to MV, straight line distance. With good wind and weather, you could make that in two days, 2.5 at the most. Looking at the map, I'd fly direct to Denver area. From there either follow the I-70W over the pass, about 10,000 feet, then south to Moab, UT, and MV. Or, fly direct to Pueblo, CO, then south to pick up highway 160W to the Four Corners area, then direct to MV. Long cross country flights are a lot of short legs combined, one leg at a time. If you can fly a good 1.5 hour leg, you can fly anywhere you want to go. For those that thrive on long cross country flights in very small aircraft, especially Kolbs, this type flying is addictive. I was lucky to find a friend that had that same desire, same flying style, and a lot of free time to accomplish the flights. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: MV-09 Dreaming-Flight planning- maybe just dreaming
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 07, 2009
mccarthy(at)jefnet.com wrote: > I'm a long time reader of the list, and would love to fly out to MV to meet > the group, and see the area, but have way too many hurdles to jump to be > possible. I live 70 miles south of Oshkosh, WI, have no "real" cross > country time, no mountain experience, and a very unpredictable work > schedule. I have a original Firestar, but just for flying around the area, > and have a Zenith 601HD 912ul for getting around. The Zenith cruises just > fine between 80-100MPH, with a 3 hour duration, but can't land where a Kolb > can. > First off, for flight planning, should I would fly to Albuquerque and then > up to MV to avoid the higher elevations? Secondly, is anyone from the upper > Midwest considering this trip? I believe there is courage, knowledge, and > strength in numbers. > In summary, this will probably just have to stay on my wish list, but I am > one of those who enjoys the planning as much as the trip. > > Tom McCarthy > Firestar N441TM > Zenith 601HD N514TM Just FYI, I may not be able to make it. The new prop isn't working out as I've expected so I may be down experimenting rather than flying for fun.... There may still be some others from my area going tho.... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=238166#238166 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: MV-09 Dreaming-Flight planning- maybe just dreaming
Date: Apr 07, 2009
> Just FYI, I may not be able to make it. The new prop isn't working out as I've expected so I may be down experimenting rather than flying for fun.... > There may still be some others from my area going tho.... > -------- > LS > Titan II SS 225 sm! You can fly that in on leg. If you miss it, you will be sacrificing some good quality time with other like minded Kolb folks you won't find any place else. Don't miss the opportunity of a great get together so close to home. There will be some of the original Monument Valley gang that have been to every Unplanned/Unorganized Kolb Flyin, MV, UT, since the first one in 2003. Again this year, we will miss several of our original gang that have gone on the that big Kolb Flyin in the sky. Looking forward to seeing Tom and Betty Kuffel again. They flew in for the 2003 flyin, were planning on returning in 2004, and also flying with me to Alaska that same year. A little incident broke their Prospector experimental, grounding them for a while. I think they will have their new experimental flying soon. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: MV-09 Dreaming-Flight planning- maybe just dreaming
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 07, 2009
John Hauck wrote: > > > 225 sm! You can fly that in on leg. > > If you miss it, you will be sacrificing some good quality time with other > like minded Kolb folks you won't find any place else. > > Don't miss the opportunity of a great get together so close to home. > > There will be some of the original Monument Valley gang that have been to > every Unplanned/Unorganized Kolb Flyin, MV, UT, since the first one in 2003. > Again this year, we will miss several of our original gang that have gone on > the that big Kolb Flyin in the sky. > > Looking forward to seeing Tom and Betty Kuffel again. They flew in for the > 2003 flyin, were planning on returning in 2004, and also flying with me to > Alaska that same year. A little incident broke their Prospector > experimental, grounding them for a while. I think they will have their new > experimental flying soon. > > john h > mkIII Well I'm hoping I'll get my problem resolved by then. As-is, I'm not yet convinced I have a safe situation for a long flight so I need to get it fixed first. Just FYI, I have a prop harmonic that I'm still researching, a hard buzz in the seat and a rotating low frequency hum. Last night I finally figured out it wasn't acceptable - I hadn't flown for an extended period of time until last night so didn't think it was a problem until I spent some time in the plane with it. I was ready to land after a little more than half an hour. I'm as close to convinced as I can be that it's NOT the fault of the prop or the plane, but simply the two together. But a hard vibration isn't something I want to let go unaddressed...... Next thing I'm going to do is take it off and check the balance just to be sure, but an unbalanced WD right out of the factory is just not something I think the guys at WD would allow to happen. So I'll be a test pilot for a little while longer looks like...... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=238170#238170 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: MV-09 Dreaming-Flight planning- maybe just dreaming
Date: Apr 07, 2009
> > So I'll be a test pilot for a little while longer looks like...... > > LS Make sure all three blades have as near pitch as possible. Usually, this will be the primary reason for a vibration or harmonic in the airframe. I believe the prop has a life time customer satisfaction guarantee. Work with Daryl at WD. I'm waiting on new blades for my prop. Hope they get here before time to fly to Lakeland. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: MV-09 Dreaming-Flight planning- maybe just dreaming
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 07, 2009
John Hauck wrote: > > > Make sure all three blades have as near pitch as possible. Usually, this > will be the primary reason for a vibration or harmonic in the airframe. > > I believe the prop has a life time customer satisfaction guarantee. Work > with Daryl at WD. > > I'm waiting on new blades for my prop. Hope they get here before time to > fly to Lakeland. > > john h > mkIII Yeah, I have the blades as pefectly pitched as I can get them with the protractor. The tracking is less than 1/4" on all blades too.... I may have a go with the 4" extension which is what the IVO had on it. It's probably unlikely an inch would make a difference but it might. I'm calling daryl here in a bit to talk it over with him. There're a couple other things to try too. So the experimenting shall continue ;). LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=238173#238173 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: MV-09 Dreaming-Flight planning- maybe just dreaming
Date: Apr 07, 2009
> I may have a go with the 4" extension which is what the IVO had on it. It's probably unlikely an inch would make a difference but it might. I'm calling daryl here in a bit to talk it over with him. > > LS I have had good luck with a 4" extension on the mkIII. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "kirkds" <kirkds(at)dishmail.net>
Subject: Re: MV-09 Dreaming-Flight planning- maybe just dreaming
Date: Apr 07, 2009
Secondly, is anyone from the upper > Midwest considering this trip? I believe there is courage, knowledge, and > strength in numbers. I considered it but too far for me. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: MV-09 Dreaming-Flight planning- maybe just dreaming
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 07, 2009
John Hauck wrote: > > > > I have had good luck with a 4" extension on the mkIII. > > john h > mkIII Dale said the extra inch is almost guaranteed not to make a difference. Going down in diameter is the next idea..... ugh..... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=238199#238199 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Sun and Fun 2009
From: "cspoke" <cspoke(at)gulftel.com>
Date: Apr 07, 2009
I too am looking forward to spending time with all the Kolb gang at Sun n Fun. I'll be there Friday and Saturday. Hope to see some of you then -------- Craig Spoke Mk 111 Xtra VW (in the works) Lillian, AL cspoke(at)gulftel.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=238207#238207 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 07, 2009
From: Dave Kulp <undoctor(at)ptd.net>
Subject: Back to gascolators
Folks, I bought a nice used gascolator a few months back and it has what appears to be a vacuum fitting on the top. Before I install it I need to know the options/requirements re: the vacuum line? I.e., can it be plugged or is it's use necessary for the gascolator to function properly? Thanks Dave Kulp Bethlehem, PA Firefly 098 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 07, 2009
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Back to gascolators
At 06:45 PM 4/7/2009, Dave Kulp wrote: >I bought a nice used gascolator a few months back and it has what appears >to be a vacuum fitting on the top. Before I install it I need to know the >options/requirements re: the vacuum line? I.e., can it be plugged or is >it's use necessary for the gascolator to function properly? Vacuum doesn't seem likely... are you sure it's not a primer connection? -Dana -- Okay, who put a "stop payment" on my reality check? ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Sun and Fun 2009
From: "N111KX (Kip)" <n111kx(at)mindspring.com>
Date: Apr 07, 2009
I'm watching the weather... :D Kip -------- Kip Firestar II, N111KX Waiex, N111YX Quickie 1, N111QX Atlanta Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=238225#238225 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 07, 2009
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: A Truly Classic Statement by Dennis Souder
The following is a truly classic statement extracted from a post made by our Dennis Souder, former Kolb Aircraft company owner. I' too have been there, done that, but the best is the last few words below highlighted in blue. jerb "I must have been daydreaming about something else and not paying attention to my flying chores; all of a sudden I saw the horizon moving very quickly upward. I added full throttle instantly, but too late and I hit the ground very hard - but not hard enough to stick." ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 07, 2009
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: A Truly Classic Statement by Dennis Souder
The following is a truly classic statement extracted from a post made by our Dennis Souder, former Kolb Aircraft company owner. I' too have been there, done that, but the best is the last few words below highlighted in blue. jerb "I must have been daydreaming about something else and not paying attention to my flying chores; all of a sudden I saw the horizon moving very quickly upward. I added full throttle instantly, but too late and I hit the ground very hard - but not hard enough to stick." ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: 912 ULS starter
Date: Apr 07, 2009
> Thanks for the info on the size battery you're using. I was hoping someone had actually tested the amp draw of the starter while cranking. Not something one would normally check but I've never been called 'normal'! [Laughing] > > -------- > Scott Scott: This is the battery I use in my mkIII and 912ULS: http://www.odysseybatteries.com/battery/pc545.htm john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ted Cowan" <tc1917(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: blade harmonics
Date: Apr 08, 2009
I still have the problem of harmonics with my blades on my slingshot. I have narrowed it back down to the blades. even though they have been sent back twice and super balanced by myself and lazer set, it is still there, buzz buzz buzz. drives you nuts. put a good anr set in my helmet and that makes it tolerable. friend has a new set of wd blades down in florida. gotta get down there and put them on my plane. if it makes it go away I am going after wd for new blades big time. this noise is awsome and sounds like I am flying a five o'clock charlie in korea. good luck. on two of my blades you can see the cloth and one has a smaller tip. told wd this and they didnt do anything but grind them down further. gotta prove it first. will think twice about my next set of blades. ted cowan, alabama, slingshot 912. p.s. if it werent for this harmonic problem I think I have the perfect flying machine, zoom zoom. at least for me. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Kmet" <jlsk1(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: blade harmonics
Date: Apr 08, 2009
Hey Ted, I just started flying my MK-3C with a 912 with the Titan exhaust,(& WD Prop) & have a similar harmonics. Now don`t get me wrong, mine isn`t as pronounced as yours, & I`ve only flown it 2.2 hours with the 912, but here`s something I`m gonna try, unless you already have & proven it doesn`t work. When I look at the exhaust/prop view from the side, my exhaust is hitting the blades a few inches up the blade in the flatter area of the prop. My exhaust goes straight up now, but if I rotate it 90 degrees either way, it looks like it will hit the prop more in the "hub -to -blade transition area, in the round part of the blade just as it exits the hub. It will be another week or 2 before I get to try this, So if you already have, or do soon, let me know what happened. Also, mine isn`t so bad that a tweak of the throttle lessens it & If it doesnt` go away, I`ll probably live with it. None on my friends have mentioned it, & I have`nt either, on purpose, to see if anyone else notices. Thanks, Jim Kmet Cookeville, TN MK-3C 912 MK-3C 582 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ted Cowan" <tc1917(at)bellsouth.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:53 AM Subject: Kolb-List: blade harmonics > > I still have the problem of harmonics with my blades on my slingshot. I > have narrowed it back down to the blades. even though they have been sent > back twice and super balanced by myself and lazer set, it is still there, > buzz buzz buzz. drives you nuts. put a good anr set in my helmet and > that makes it tolerable. friend has a new set of wd blades down in > florida. gotta get down there and put them on my plane. if it makes it go > away I am going after wd for new blades big time. this noise is awsome > and sounds like I am flying a five o'clock charlie in korea. good luck. > on two of my blades you can see the cloth and one has a smaller tip. told > wd this and they didnt do anything but grind them down further. gotta > prove it first. will think twice about my next set of blades. ted cowan, > alabama, slingshot 912. p.s. if it werent for this harmonic problem I > think I have the perfect flying machine, zoom zoom. at least for me. > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 912 ULS starter
From: "Thom Riddle" <riddletr(at)gmail.com>
Date: Apr 08, 2009
I believe the typical draw while cranking the 912ul is about 75 amps. I'm going to check mine today and will report back. 912ULS may be different. -------- Thom Riddle Buffalo, NY http://riddletr.googlepages.com/sportpilot-cfi http://riddletr.googlepages.com/a%26pmechanix A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works. - John Gaule Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=238289#238289 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Blumax008(at)aol.com
Date: Apr 08, 2009
Subject: Re: Harsh words about Rotax
In a message dated 4/5/2009 1:35:32 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, donaho1(at)verizon.net writes: I have a 503 now that hasn`t given be any problems at all. Granted it only has 60 hours on it but it has never skipped a beat. I put over 100 hours on a used 377 (total hours around 250) and it never had a problem My friend, if you own a Rotax 503 you are one very intelligent & lucky fellow! That motor will give you years & years of worry-free, enjoyable flying. Run that sucker wide open! It doesn't care a hoot! We tow hang gliders here in NW Florida using the 503. Mine has over 1,600 hours on it now with C-box, Pennzoil & Amoco Super Premium & still going strong. Will be 12 years old in September of this year. All with 3 tops. No major overhauls. I'll leave you with my maxim for 503 owners... IF IT AIN'T BROKE...DON'T FIX IT. I've since added a new one... GET OFF THE INTERNET & GO FLY! (which reminds me, I gotta' go fly!) Bill Catalina Ochlockonee Bay, Florida (on the coast south of Tallahassee) **************Worried about job security? Check out the 5 safest jobs in a recession. (http://jobs.aol.com/gallery/growing-job-industries?ncid=emlcntuscare00000003) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 08, 2009
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: blade harmonics
> Ted, Have you considered trying a lower inertia propeller? Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 08, 2009
Subject: Re: blade harmonics
From: Richard Girard <aslsa.rng(at)gmail.com>
Ted, Have you considered getting a prop spacer and gaining a little space between the exhaust pipe opening and the prop blades? Rick On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Ted Cowan wrote: > > I still have the problem of harmonics with my blades on my slingshot. I > have narrowed it back down to the blades. even though they have been sent > back twice and super balanced by myself and lazer set, it is still there, > buzz buzz buzz. drives you nuts. put a good anr set in my helmet and that > makes it tolerable. friend has a new set of wd blades down in florida. > gotta get down there and put them on my plane. if it makes it go away I am > going after wd for new blades big time. this noise is awsome and sounds > like I am flying a five o'clock charlie in korea. good luck. on two of my > blades you can see the cloth and one has a smaller tip. told wd this and > they didnt do anything but grind them down further. gotta prove it first. > will think twice about my next set of blades. ted cowan, alabama, slingshot > 912. p.s. if it werent for this harmonic problem I think I have the perfect > flying machine, zoom zoom. at least for me. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: blade harmonics
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 08, 2009
tc1917(at)bellsouth.net wrote: > I still have the problem of harmonics with my blades on my slingshot. I > have narrowed it back down to the blades. even though they have been sent > back twice and super balanced by myself and lazer set, it is still there, > buzz buzz buzz. drives you nuts. put a good anr set in my helmet and that > makes it tolerable. friend has a new set of wd blades down in florida. > gotta get down there and put them on my plane. if it makes it go away I am > going after wd for new blades big time. this noise is awsome and sounds > like I am flying a five o'clock charlie in korea. good luck. on two of my > blades you can see the cloth and one has a smaller tip. told wd this and > they didnt do anything but grind them down further. gotta prove it first. > will think twice about my next set of blades. ted cowan, alabama, slingshot > 912. p.s. if it werent for this harmonic problem I think I have the perfect > flying machine, zoom zoom. at least for me. Well I think I've found a possible culprit on my setup. There's a resonance between the engine/mount and the frequency at which the blades vibrate fore and aft. I discovered this yesterday by accident when I happened to tap one of the blades, the entire top of the plane went "thoom" like a drum in concert with the blade. And it sounds like that frequency is the frequency I'm hearing in the cab.... Also yesterday I went over the whole butt end of the plane to make sure nothing was loose or any problems with the mounts. No problemo. In my case it's clearly not a problem with the prop itself - it's just an interaction between it and this particular plane. The only option with the WD looks like changing the diameter and I've BTDT on a couple other planes (that means a few different sets of blades that all still do the same thing). Going down in diameter is not acceptable as I need the climb performance. And I can only go up another inch before I run out of safe clearance, doubtful an inch is going to do it. So it's time to get a little busier on this - next idea is a different prop type. That's the only way I can see right now to change the blade resonance enough, get the whole fundamental changed back there. LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=238319#238319 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Harsh words about Rotax
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 08, 2009
FWIW, Regarding the 503, I'm still building up trust in my 912 in hopes it measures up to my 503's in terms of reliability ;). But seriously, I've had more trouble with 4-strokes (not the 912) over the years than I've had with any of my 503's. They usually rot away long before they wear out or do something catastrophic. Even at 4 large, the 503 is still the best deal in an aviation engine available today. The only 2-stroke rotax I"m not too fond of is the 582. It's a little less durable than the aircooled motors. And so far my 912 has been a good engine, but due to the far higher parts costs, I'm significantly more paranoid about something breaking in it. I hope it holds together as well as my 2 447's and can't remember how many 503's..... (It is nice that the crank seals aren't leaking after a couple hundred hours tho)..... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=238328#238328 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Victoria Falls
Date: Apr 08, 2009
Hi, hope this works!. This should be 3 pics of me flying at the Victoria Falls in a weightshift while in Zambia a couple of weeks ago. Quite exciting flying around and through the spray which was so atomised that the cloud just kept going up until it reached cloudbase. Flew up the Zambesi at under 500 ft looking for hippos, crocs. etc with no luck, but did find a herd of giraffes. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Harsh words about Rotax
Date: Apr 08, 2009
> Regarding the 503, I'm still building up trust in my 912 in hopes it measures up to my 503's in terms of reliability ;). > > LS If you fly it enough, I bet you'll gain a little confidence in the 912. I've been extremely lucky to have had the opportunity to enjoy many hours, over the last 25 years, in Kolb airplanes. During that time, the first eight years flying my own two strokes, and 15 years flying my own 912 engines. In between crashes and rebuilds, I put significant time on Kolb Factory two and four strokes, of which, I never had either type engine in a factory airplane quit. With 2,660.00 hours of flying my own 912 series engines, I never had a problem with the engine, although I have had a couple problems with the pilot getting lazy and not checking fuel after topping off from unreliable sources, 1994 and 1998. Based on the places my 912 engines have pushed me, I'd say I have quite a bit of confidence in their reliability, and have also helped prove that reliability. As far as high price of parts for 912 engines, aren't all engine parts expensive now? Also, I haven't had to buy parts for my 912 engines. The basic engine is close to bullet proof and do not wear out major parts. Accessories, yes, they must be replaced, like spark plugs, oil filters, oil, carb parts (probably weakest link of the 912), spark plug connectors, etc. However, it takes a lot of flying to go through these parts like some of us have done over the years. I think getting out there and grinding out hour after hour in a short period of time, 232 hours in 41 total days for example, and many other high flying hour, short number of day trips, is an excellent example of the 912 engine's reliability. Don't think I'd bite off extremely long cross country flights, flying over the inhospitible terrain, with a two stroke of any make. In fact, there is no way I would have made the 2004 flight to and in Alaska with one. Not that I do not like them, but I know the difference between two and four. As far as 4 strokes rotting away from non-use, I don't think so. I have antique tractors that are much older than me, that have sat and waited most of their life, still running like the day they were built. ;-) I might add, my 912ULS has not seen much use since last summer, but it will get out there and run like it should today, if the rats haven't eaten it since I last checked. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Victoria Falls
Date: Apr 08, 2009
Patrick: Do you fly the trike from the back seat? Notice a nice reliable 912 powering the trike. Nice photos of the Falls. I envy your travels. I have never been to Africa, but would love to do some serious flying there, if I could afford the bill. john h mkIII This should be 3 pics of me flying at the Victoria Falls in a weightshift while in Zambia a couple of weeks ago. Quite exciting flying around and through the spray which was so atomised that the cloud just kept going up until it reached cloudbase. Flew up the Zambesi at under 500 ft looking for hippos, crocs. etc with no luck, but did find a herd of giraffes. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 08, 2009
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: blade harmonics
At 11:22 AM 4/8/2009, lucien wrote: >Well I think I've found a possible culprit on my setup. There's a >resonance between the engine/mount and the frequency at which the blades >vibrate fore and aft....it's clearly not a problem with the prop itself - >it's just an interaction between it and this particular plane. If that's the case, going to a slightly stiffer or softer engine mount rubber isolator might help, change the resonant frequency. If it's a pulsating mmmmMMMmmmmMMMmmmmMMMmmmm, though, an exhaust/prop interaction seems the more likely culprit. Comparing the frequency of the cycle with the engine and prop rpm's may help to narrow it down. -Dana -- Welcome to the Federal Bureau for Reducing Bureaucracy! ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Harsh words about Rotax
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 08, 2009
John Hauck wrote: > > > As far as high price of parts for 912 engines, aren't all engine parts > expensive now? Also, I haven't had to buy parts for my 912 engines. The > basic engine is close to bullet proof and do not wear out major parts. > Accessories, yes, they must be replaced, like spark plugs, oil filters, oil, > carb parts (probably weakest link of the 912), spark plug connectors, etc. > However, it takes a lot of flying to go through these parts like some of us > have done over the years. > john h > > mkIII Actually, the value of the 912 overall is fixing to go up as the official TBO is being raised to 2000 hours, that according to Ronnie Smith IIRC. And actually, for 100hp, with a 2000 hour TBO the 912ULS is probably going to be the highest bang/buck available in that power range if it isn't already. And that TBO is pessimistic from what I've heard of the engines in the field, particularly at flight schools, where they go for as long as 3000 hours. I try to run mine up to operating temperature at least once every 2 weeks (and usually every week) to keep any possibility of corrosion away. Even if it's a trip around the pattern in the holes between the 40knot winds..... So far so good on mine at a little over 300 hours..... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=238345#238345 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: blade harmonics
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 08, 2009
Dana wrote: > > If that's the case, going to a slightly stiffer or softer engine mount > rubber isolator might help, change the resonant frequency. > > If it's a pulsating mmmmMMMmmmmMMMmmmmMMMmmmm, though, an exhaust/prop > interaction seems the more likely culprit. Comparing the frequency of the > cycle with the engine and prop rpm's may help to narrow it down. > > -Dana > > -- > Welcome to the Federal Bureau for Reducing Bureaucracy! Yeah it's a pulsating thing like you describe, it could very well be aggravated by exhaust pulses. I do have a 3" extension installed tho and the blades are a good ways away from the exhaust outlet. The lower frequency doesn't seem to correspond to anything that I can tell, though a wild guess is it coincides with the alignment of the crank and prop as it rotates around the 2.43 gear ratio. this _does_ change in frequency with rpm so that could be it. The higher frequency hum seems to be a constant frequency and, I think I repeat think..., it's the same frequency as the "thoom" I get when tapping the blade on the ground. That's probably the resonance of the blades/engine/mount etc. Next I go back up (if we ever get flyable weather again) I'm going to listen to it some more. No idea if different compliance mounts are available on my mount.... I'll try to research that and see..... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=238347#238347 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Watson" <djwatson(at)olg.com>
Subject: Re: blade harmonics
Date: Apr 08, 2009
LS, Ran into something like this years ago when I still had a Kolb, try to direct your exhaust up down or to the side if you haven't already done so, also, unbolt the prop hub and rotating it by one bolt hole and see if it makes a difference V/R, Dennis from MD. ----- Original Message ----- From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 1:27 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: blade harmonics > > > Dana wrote: >> >> If that's the case, going to a slightly stiffer or softer engine mount >> rubber isolator might help, change the resonant frequency. >> >> If it's a pulsating mmmmMMMmmmmMMMmmmmMMMmmmm, though, an exhaust/prop >> interaction seems the more likely culprit. Comparing the frequency of >> the >> cycle with the engine and prop rpm's may help to narrow it down. >> >> -Dana >> >> -- >> Welcome to the Federal Bureau for Reducing Bureaucracy! > > > Yeah it's a pulsating thing like you describe, it could very well be > aggravated by exhaust pulses. I do have a 3" extension installed tho and > the blades are a good ways away from the exhaust outlet. > > The lower frequency doesn't seem to correspond to anything that I can > tell, though a wild guess is it coincides with the alignment of the crank > and prop as it rotates around the 2.43 gear ratio. this _does_ change in > frequency with rpm so that could be it. > > The higher frequency hum seems to be a constant frequency and, I think I > repeat think..., it's the same frequency as the "thoom" I get when tapping > the blade on the ground. That's probably the resonance of the > blades/engine/mount etc. > > Next I go back up (if we ever get flyable weather again) I'm going to > listen to it some more. > > No idea if different compliance mounts are available on my mount.... I'll > try to research that and see..... > > LS > > -------- > LS > Titan II SS > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=238347#238347 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: blade harmonics
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 08, 2009
djwatson(at)olg.com wrote: > LS, > > Ran into something like this years ago when I still had a Kolb, try to > direct your exhaust up down or to the side if you haven't already done so, > also, unbolt the prop hub and rotating it by one bolt hole and see if it > makes a difference > > V/R, > Dennis from MD. > > > --- Oh yeah, this may be possible with the exhaust now that I thinka bout it. Ironically, my FS II had this exact same prop (WD 68" taper).... completely different airframe and motor but it was totally silky smooth with no vibration whatsoever..... just that healthy 503 howl.... ;) LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=238352#238352 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell(at)fmtcblue.com>
Subject: Re: Victoria Falls
Date: Apr 08, 2009
I am thinking that he should adopt me and take me along on some of these trips. Larry C ----- Original Message ----- From: John Hauck To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 10:39 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Victoria Falls Patrick: Do you fly the trike from the back seat? Notice a nice reliable 912 powering the trike. Nice photos of the Falls. I envy your travels. I have never been to Africa, but would love to do some serious flying there, if I could afford the bill. john h mkIII This should be 3 pics of me flying at the Victoria Falls in a weightshift while in Zambia a couple of weeks ago. Quite exciting flying around and through the spray which was so atomised that the cloud just kept going up until it reached cloudbase. Flew up the Zambesi at under 500 ft looking for hippos, crocs. etc with no luck, but did find a herd of giraffes. Cheers Pat ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 04/08/09 05:53:00 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: blade harmonics
Date: Apr 08, 2009
> Oh yeah, this may be possible with the exhaust now that I thinka bout it. > > Ironically, my FS II had this exact same prop (WD 68" taper).... > completely different airframe and motor but it was totally silky smooth > with no vibration whatsoever..... just that healthy 503 howl.... ;) > > LS Never heard of a Titan Exhaust/912 prop noise/vibration/harmonic problem. I experimented with the outlets on my Titan left, right, and straight up. No problems. I know of three Kolbs that flew with Rick Thomasson's exhaust designed for the Pulsar. All three suffered from a terrible rattling/noisy exhaust beat caused by the retreating blade hitting the downward aimed exhaust pipe on the right exhaust system. I knew I was going to have that problem so I cut the outlets perpendicular to the ground and eliminated the noise. There was no vibration or harmonic associated with this system. I know of three airplanes that have had this similar problem: a Titan with 912, a SS with 912, and a SS with 582. The SS with 582, with 3 blade warp drive, was caused by loose fabric on the inboard rear corner of the right wing. I don't know what Ted Cowan's problem is, probably disturbed air flow and the way it is hitting the prop blade, or blades. Items mounted in front of the prop all contribute to the way air flows to and through it. Ever play with an electric fan? Set one up, turn it on high, then start messing with the air flow to the blades. You'll get all kinds of very unusal complaints coming from those blades. Why wouldn't a pusher respond similarly? john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 08, 2009
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: blade harmonics
FWIW, I get a similar pulsing hum at cruise rpm on my UltraStar. -Dana -- I hadda I LOVE WINDOWS sticker on my car...but it crashed. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 912 ULS starter
From: "Thom Riddle" <riddletr(at)gmail.com>
Date: Apr 08, 2009
I don't know where I got the "typical draw while cranking the 912ul is about 75 amps." from but it was way off for our 912UL per testing this morning. Using clamp on ammeter I got ~13 amps current during cranking our 912UL at about 45-50F OAT. I hope this figure helps with at least a ballpark guestimate. -------- Thom Riddle Buffalo, NY http://riddletr.googlepages.com/sportpilot-cfi http://riddletr.googlepages.com/a%26pmechanix A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works. - John Gaule Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=238378#238378 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "frank.goodnight" <frank.goodnight(at)att.net>
Subject: V.W.conversion
Date: Apr 08, 2009
Anyone have an idea wich would be the more satisfying , Great plains , Revmaster, or some other? Frank Goodnight Firestar 2 On Apr 8, 2009, at 4:38 PM, Thom Riddle wrote: > > I don't know where I got the "typical draw while cranking the 912ul > is about 75 amps." from but it was way off for our 912UL per testing > this morning. > > Using clamp on ammeter I got ~13 amps current during cranking our > 912UL at about 45-50F OAT. > > I hope this figure helps with at least a ballpark guestimate. > > -------- > Thom Riddle > Buffalo, NY > http://riddletr.googlepages.com/sportpilot-cfi > http://riddletr.googlepages.com/a%26pmechanix > > A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from > a simple system that works. > - John Gaule > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=238378#238378 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: now an actual Kolb question
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 08, 2009
What is the status of the new mark III? I.e. here it is with I believe John H. flying it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6LjOighew8 Just curious if testing is complete and TNK is selling it or did they abandon it or ? LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=238384#238384 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 08, 2009
From: Dave Kulp <undoctor(at)ptd.net>
Subject: Re: Back to gascolators
** >to be a vacuum fitting on the top. Before I install it I need to know the >options/requirements re: the vacuum line? I.e., can it be plugged or is >it's use necessary for the gascolator to function properly? Vacuum doesn't seem likely... are you sure it's not a primer connection? -Dana I guarantee you I'm not sure of anything. Following is a web address and the second entry down has a picture of the same setup. Maybe that would give you a hint. I asked the mechanic at Queen City, where I've been flying out of and he didn't know. He's worked on military jets for years and now is the first he's worked GA, so the setup may be peculiar to home builts... ** http://www.vansairforce.com/community/showthread.php?t=5513 Dave ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 08, 2009
From: TheWanderingWench <thewanderingwench(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Victoria Falls
Pat - The shot of you over the Falls is incredible. You ought to make a banner and put it up over your house! :>) Arty www.LessonsFromTheEdge.com/uladventure2009.htm "Life's a daring adventure or nothing" Helen Keller "I refuse to tip toe through life just to arrive safely at death." --- On Wed, 4/8/09, pj.ladd wrote: > From: pj.ladd <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com> > Subject: Kolb-List: Victoria Falls > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2009, 9:15 AM > > > > > > > > Hi, > hope this > works!. > > This should be 3 pics of > me flying at the Victoria > Falls in a weightshift while in Zambia a couple of weeks > ago. Quite exciting > flying around and through the spray which was so atomised > that the cloud just > kept going up until it reached cloudbase. > Flew up the Zambesi at > under 500 ft looking for > hippos, crocs. etc with no luck, but did find a herd of > giraffes. > > Cheers > > Pat > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: now an actual Kolb question
Date: Apr 08, 2009
> What is the status of the new mark III? I.e. here it is with I believe John H. flying it: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6LjOighew8 > > Just curious if testing is complete and TNK is selling it or did they > abandon it or ? > > LS That clip was shot during the Dealers Showcase at Sun and Fun 2008. My buddy Dick Rahill missed the pilots briefing and they would not let him fly. Normally, we would fly the FSII and MKIII at the same time during the demonstration. For many years, it was me, Dick, and Dennis Souder, doing the Showcase. It was extremely windy, gusty, and turbulent, during this flight. Those of you who have flown Lakeland during S&F will know what I mean. However, it is not readily noticeable in the clip. I spent three weeks in London testing the MKIIIx March 2008. Testing was completed and the 40 hours flown off. Weather was cold and wet, along with wind, during that period. I think the MKIIIx is still for sale. It has been featured on Ebay, but did not make the minimum. It is a good flying airplane, has full flaps, ailerons operated by Morris Cables, nice comfy fiberglass seats molded into one piece. I'm not ready to trade my mkIII for one, but the X is a good airplane. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 08, 2009
From: herb <herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Subject: Re: now an actual Kolb question
Its a deal !!! Could be yours for a very good price...Call Travis..!! :-) Herb At 05:26 PM 4/8/2009, you wrote: > >What is the status of the new mark III? I.e. here it is with I >believe John H. flying it: > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6LjOighew8 > >Just curious if testing is complete and TNK is selling it or did >they abandon it or ? > >LS > >-------- >LS >Titan II SS > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=238384#238384 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: now an actual Kolb question
Date: Apr 08, 2009
> Its a deal !!! Could be yours for a very good price...Call > Travis..!! :-) Herb It sure is. Forgot to mention it is powered with a new 912ULS with Titan SS exhaust system, Warp Drive 3 blade fast taper prop and no wierd vibrations or harmonics. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mike Welch <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Back to gascolators
Date: Apr 08, 2009
Dave=2C That port you refer to a 1/8" NPT hole=2C isn't it? If it is=2C it is th e primer port. If you do not need a primer=2C you don't need the port. Pl ug it. Gascolaters have such a wide range of engines they're expected to work wi th. It's easier to machine the hole=2C and thread it=2C than try to create two types of gascolators=2C those with the hole=2C and those without. If you go to www.aircraftspruce.com=2C and read the descriptions of the g ascolators they offer=2C you'll see the primer port mentioned. Mike Welch MkIII Date: Wed=2C 8 Apr 2009 18:58:28 -0400 From: undoctor(at)ptd.net Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Back to gascolators >to be a vacuum fitting on the top. Before I install it I need to know th e >options/requirements re: the vacuum line? I.e.=2C can it be plugged or is >it's use necessary for the gascolator to function properly? Vacuum doesn't seem likely... are you sure it's not a primer connecti on? -Dana I guarantee you I'm not sure of anything. Following is a web address and t he second entry down has a picture of the same setup. Maybe that would give you a hint. I asked th e mechanic at Queen City=2C where I've been flying out of and he didn't know. He's worked on military jets for years and now is the first he's worked GA=2C so the setup may be peculiar to home bui lts... http://www.vansairforce.com/community/showthread.php?t=5513 Dave _________________________________________________________________ Windows Live=99: Keep your life in sync. http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_allup_1a_explore_042009 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Back to gascolators
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 08, 2009
Mine also has the thrid port on top, its the primer port.. Plug it !!! Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=238419#238419 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 08, 2009
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: Back to gascolators
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:58:28 -0400 From: Dave Kulp <undoctor(at)ptd.net> Dave, It is a primer tap. See: http://www.andair.co.uk/pdfs/GAS01.pdf Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 08, 2009
From: herb <herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Subject: Mixture control...
Jack See your post and am reminded...how is the mixture control coming...? IMHO...not only does it promise a bit better fuel burn through better mixture control...but also may allow us to dial out the egt peak as we drop below 5k rpms? Perhaps make the engine less susceptible to seizures...? Herb ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: now an actual Kolb question
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Apr 08, 2009
John Hauck wrote: > > > It sure is. > > Forgot to mention it is powered with a new 912ULS with Titan SS exhaust > system, Warp Drive 3 blade fast taper prop and no wierd vibrations or > harmonics. > > john h > mkIII lol..... There's actually a video that Travis made doing a walkaround of what looks like that plane. I watched it 3 times straight in a row at work today (when I was supposed to be working). I did notice the 4" saber extension and my prop on the motor..... I love my titan but I've always been a kolb fan and a fanatic after my FS II (which I still regret having had to sell). So I've been curious how the new Mark III had come out. Wonder if any of the new style have been sold and are being built? I watched the video of the firefly as well, which looks like it probably was flown on the same day. The gusty/thermally weather was definitely evident in that video........ LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=238431#238431 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: V.W.conversion
Date: Apr 08, 2009
Frank "Most satisfying" ?? You get the most thrust by no small margin with a reduction drive VW engine. Revmaster, Happy(sp), AreoVee, and GP direct drive engines will not except the Valley redrive so they would not be very "satisfying". Great Plains redrive engines and properly built big dune buggy engines will except the Valley redrive. They give very "satisfying" thrust in Kolb airplanes. A big dune buggy engine built super strong with a mild cam and valve springs and a few aircraft conversion parts would be less expensive and still be powerful and reliable so that would be and is very "satisfying" for me. There are some gear reduction drives that may be suitable for VWs that might fit work on direct drive VW aircraft conversion engines but???? Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIC ----- Original Message ----- From: "frank.goodnight" <frank.goodnight(at)att.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:53 PM Subject: Kolb-List: V.W.conversion > > > Anyone have an idea wich would be the more satisfying , Great plains , > Revmaster, or some other? > Frank Goodnight > Firestar 2 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: now an actual Kolb question
Date: Apr 08, 2009


March 25, 2009 - April 08, 2009

Kolb-Archive.digest.vol-ic