Kolb-Archive.digest.vol-nq

February 06, 2016 - March 08, 2016



      > *From:* owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:
      > owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.co
      m]
      > *On Behalf Of *Larry Cottrell
      > *Sent:* Thursday, January 21, 2016 9:34 PM
      > *To:* kolb-list(at)matronics.com
      > *Subject:* Re: Kolb-List: A question of Battery type
      >
      >
      > <http://www.arizonabattery.com/?page=shop/flypage&product_id=58&categ
      ory_id=b291dca6cea297f2a41f49052a63d38d&>
      > http://www.arizonabattery.com/?page=shop/flypage&product_id=58&catego
      ry_id=b291dca6cea297f2a41f49052a63d38d&
      >
      > This is the one that I use and have a cheap float charger that I  keep on
      > it when I am not using. It has been in service for three years so far. Th
      e
      > problem is if they are regularly discharged, the float takes care of that
      .
      > Larry
      >
      >
      > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Nick Cassara < 
      > nickc(at)mtaonline.net> wrote:
      > nickc(at)mtaonline.net>
      >
      > Kolbers,
      >
      > In a few months I will be needing to buy a battery for my Kolbra
      .so, I am
      > wondering where we stand in the debate between Lead acid and Lithium.
      > Thank you as always for your insights!
      >
      > Nick Cassara
      > Palmer, AK
      > PAAQ
      >
      > ==========
      > br> fts!)
      > r> > w.buildersbooks.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">
      > <http://www.buildersbooks.com/>www.buildersbooks.com
      > rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"> <http://www.matronics.com/contribut
      ion>
      > http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      >           -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
      > ==========
      > -List" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">
      > <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List>
      > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
      > ==========
      > FORUMS -
      > eferrer" target="_blank"> <http://forums.matronics.com/>
      > http://forums.matronics.com
      > ==========
      > b Site -
      >           -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
      > rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"> <http://www.matronics.com/contribut
      ion>
      > http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      > ==========
      >
      >
      > --
      > *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.*
      >
      > *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email
      > address before sending.*
      >
      >
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: 582 Preventive maintenance - stuff that fails
From: "Richard Pike" <thegreybaron(at)charter.net>
Date: Feb 06, 2016
Last fall I had one side of the ignition system quit on the 582. One of the red trigger coil wires had broken at the male connector where it plugged into the coil pack female connector. As good as the Austrians seem to be at building machinery, they are at least that bad at wiring. They use wire that eventually goes soft and gummy. In this case, the insulation had gone bad and allowed moisture to get in, corrode the wire, and it broke. Three years ago one of the wires from the coil pack had gone mushy on its insulation, the internal wire corroded, had to have it replaced. So I pulled the engine, sat it on the workbench so I could poke around inside the mag end, turned out that both the red wires from both trigger coils had gone mushy on their external insulation. Imminent failure mode. Clipped them off close to the coils, used an Exacto knife to scrape off any corrosion, soldered new wires on, potted the whole mess with much silicone and put it back together. Also one of the yellow with black stripe wires from the coil packs to ground had a similar problem, the insulation had turned to mush. Replaced that also. Spent the afternoon today putting everything back together on the airplane, replaced all the fuel line as well. Even the good black rubber stuff from NAPA is cheap enough to replace every 5 years. Peace of mind. Finally got it done and ran it up just before dark, ran nice and smooth, put it away. Just now went out to see if the coolant had sucked itself back into the radiator system, and discovered one of the radiator hoses has moisture around the lower hose clamp. Tomorrow after church guess I will drain the coolant again, and replace that hose. Details, details, details. When you get them all right, then next years flying season ought to have a lot less drama! -------- Richard Pike Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Kingsport, TN 3TN0 Would you consider yourself to be a good person? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWcDXT6pH7A Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452652#452652 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Patrick Ladd <patrickjladd(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: posts
Date: Feb 15, 2016
Anyone out there. No posts for about a week. Say hello to check if my confuser is working. Just gone to Windows 10 and may have lost something in the changeover. Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Eddie <e.bayliss(at)blueyonder.co.uk>
Subject: posts
Date: Feb 15, 2016
Still here Pat just quiet -----Original Message----- From: "Patrick Ladd" <patrickjladd(at)hotmail.com> Sent: =8E15/=8E02/=8E2016 11:36 Subject: Kolb-List: posts Anyone out there. No posts for about a week. Say hello to check if my confuser is working. Ju st gone to Windows 10 and may have lost something in the changeover. Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 15, 2016
From: mojavjoe(at)comcast.net
Subject: posts
hello ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Ladd" <patrickjladd(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 6:36:41 AM Subject: Kolb-List: posts Anyone out there. No posts for about a week. Say hello to check if my confuser is working. Just gone to Windows 10 and may have lost something in the changeover. Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 15, 2016
Subject: posts
From: Charlie England <ceengland7(at)gmail.com>
U3RpbGwgaGVyZTsgZ29vZCBsdWNrIHdpdGggMTAuCgpDaGFybGllCgoKU2VudCBvbiBhIFNhbXN1 bmcgR2FsYXh5IFPCrjQKCjxkaXY+LS0tLS0tLS0gT3JpZ2luYWwgbWVzc2FnZSAtLS0tLS0tLTwv ZGl2PjxkaXY+RnJvbTogUGF0cmljayBMYWRkIDxwYXRyaWNramxhZGRAaG90bWFpbC5jb20+IDwv ZGl2PjxkaXY+RGF0ZTowMi8xNS8yMDE2ICA1OjM2IEFNICAoR01ULTA2OjAwKSA8L2Rpdj48ZGl2 PlRvOiBrb2xiLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbSA8L2Rpdj48ZGl2PlN1YmplY3Q6IEtvbGItTGlz dDogcG9zdHMgPC9kaXY+PGRpdj4KPC9kaXY+QW55b25lIG91dCB0aGVyZS4KTm8gcG9zdHMgZm9y IGFib3V0IGEgd2Vlay4gU2F5IGhlbGxvIHRvIGNoZWNrIGlmIG15IGNvbmZ1c2VyIGlzIHdvcmtp bmcuIEp1c3QgZ29uZSB0byBXaW5kb3dzIDEwIGFuZCBtYXkgaGF2ZSBsb3N0IHNvbWV0aGluZyBp biB0aGUgY2hhbmdlb3Zlci4gUGF0 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Mark III for sale
From: "Dee One" <leblancds(at)cox.net>
Date: Feb 15, 2016
Selling my Mark III to build another. Kolb Mark III Classic completely rebuilt in late 2015. Recovered with new fabric and repainted with top quality Stits epoxy paint. New Rotax 582 engine installed. New plexiglass windscreen and doors, custom 15 gallon capacity welded aluminum fuel tank, front and side accessible baggage compartment, both mechanical and electric fuel pump with fuel pressure gauge, ELT with remote on panel, five point seatbelts, strobe lights, hydraulic heel brakes disc brakes, new Key West voltage regulator, dual CHTs, dual EGTs, ASI, hobbs meter, altimeter, VSI, new COM Radio with the intercom and new Gulf Coast headsets with gel earcups, push to talk, new custom-fabricated engine cover and fuselage cover . . . . only 8 hours on new engine and rebuild. $18K+=my cost. Selling for $15K OBO Contact Dee LeBlanc 225-802-1038 leblancds(at)cox.net -------- The Past is History The Future is a Mystery Today is a Gift Thats Why They Call it the Present Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452835#452835 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/thumb_dscn2324_1024_190.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: posts
From: "Richard Pike" <thegreybaron(at)charter.net>
Date: Feb 15, 2016
Since it is a very slow 2 weeks, and people are concerned - rightly - about the change over to Windows 10, and I am bored (And it is sleeting with freezing rain outside)... Non Kolb topic follows: I went to Windows 10 last spring from Windows 7, it worked great for several months, then went into endless boot mode. The wife's computer (Win 10) soon followed suit. Neither could be made to boot or behave. Here is how I retrieved all the data: (both the wife & I are using desktops with room for several hard drives) went to Best Buy and purchased a new hard drive for each 'puter, be sure that the drive you buy is at least as big or bigger than your current drive, this will be important later. Make this new drive your C: drive. Loaded the new drives for each 'puter with their respective copies of Windows 7. Now I could retrieve all our files: boot into Win7, access the wonky Win10 drive which is still plugged into your motherboard, but is no longer C:, copy all your files and pictures back into your fresh copy of 7 on C:. Now you have recovered all your stuff, your are back on good ol' stable Windows 7, and you have a spare hard drive in your computer with a dud copy of Windows 10 on it. Leave it there: you will be using it soon. Two weeks ago Microsoft announced that it will soon be including Windows 10 as a mandatory download/patch to Windows 7 & 8, so here are the precautions I took: Bought a new hard drive for each computer, same size as the one I bought this summer, cloned Win 7 from C: to it. This is easy to do with a free downloaded program called Macrium Reflect. http://www.macrium.com/reflectfree.aspx Now I have 2 identical hard drives with bootable copies of Win 7 on each computer, bootable being the important word. If you now download Windows 10 to your C: drive, and it fails, you still have a fully functional identical hard drive with 7 or 8 on it off to the side. Plus you still have your old hard drive in there with your wonky copy of Win 10 on it - we are now about to put that one to use. With 2 fully functional hard drives with copies of Win 7 available, you now are safe, so go ahead and download and install Windows 10 on the C: drive over the top of Windows 7. Now you have a functional (for the time being) copy of Win 10 on C:, and another functional hard drive with Win 7 sitting idle off to the side. If you want to guarantee that it cannot get a virus, or get nuked if your neighborhood gets hit by lightning, you can always unplug it from the motherboard. Windows 10 has (IMO) all sorts of goofy stuff all over it, so I downloaded and installed Classic Shell; http://www.classicshell.net/ Now Win 10 looks and superficially functions like a cross between Windows 7 and Windows XP. Very user friendly, all you have done is put Windows 10 into a different skin while keeping all the serious grunt of Windows 10. And in spite of it's flaws, Windows 10 does have some serious grunt. Until it goes wonky... Now fire up Macrium Reflect and clone your newly tweaked C: copy of Windows 10 to your third (new) hard drive. You now have back ups for any eventuality. If Windows 10 on your C: drive fails, you can swap it out with either of your back ups, and you have lost nothing but maybe the last few days of work or pictures. (I have a schedule where I reclone the C: drive to my 10 clone (L) drive every week. Macrium Reflect will do this) I included a screen shot of the drives in my computer so you can see how they are named. I strongly recommend you do this: right click and rename the various hard drives before you start to clone them, or sure as sin, you'll clone a blank drive over a good one, and lose everything. MAKE SURE YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING. A mistake here is fatal. Maybe this sounds like a lot of trouble, but I have 25 years worth of pictures, sermons and family history documents on my 'puter, and $120 for a couple of spare hard drives is cheap compared to trying to get all that stuff back if/when Microsoft's latest crapware fails on me. Especially since I have already learned the hard way that it is easier to spend a couple hours backing your computer up than spending a week recovering it after it crashes. PS: If you like poking around in your computer, all this stuff will be obvious. If you have never poked around inside your computer and these instructions are not completely obvious to you, this is not a good place to start. The learning curve will leave you with an erased and non-functioning computer. Go away and pretend you never read any of this. -------- Richard Pike Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Kingsport, TN 3TN0 Would you consider yourself to be a good person? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWcDXT6pH7A Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452845#452845 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/hds_medium_764.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: posts
From: Charlie England <ceengland7(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 15, 2016
Thanks for writing up the process, but I have a question. Where did you see that Win10 is going to be a *mandatory* update to 7? I don't want to boot my -7 computers one day & discover that they've been converted to tablets. (I'd consider 10 a 'mandatory' update for 8, just to have a functional computer....) Thanks, Charlie On 2/15/2016 10:35 AM, Richard Pike wrote: > > Since it is a very slow 2 weeks, and people are concerned - rightly - about the change over to Windows 10, and I am bored (And it is sleeting with freezing rain outside)... Non Kolb topic follows: > > I went to Windows 10 last spring from Windows 7, it worked great for several months, then went into endless boot mode. The wife's computer (Win 10) soon followed suit. Neither could be made to boot or behave. > > Here is how I retrieved all the data: (both the wife & I are using desktops with room for several hard drives) went to Best Buy and purchased a new hard drive for each 'puter, be sure that the drive you buy is at least as big or bigger than your current drive, this will be important later. Make this new drive your C: drive. Loaded the new drives for each 'puter with their respective copies of Windows 7. Now I could retrieve all our files: boot into Win7, access the wonky Win10 drive which is still plugged into your motherboard, but is no longer C:, copy all your files and pictures back into your fresh copy of 7 on C:. Now you have recovered all your stuff, your are back on good ol' stable Windows 7, and you have a spare hard drive in your computer with a dud copy of Windows 10 on it. Leave it there: you will be using it soon. > > Two weeks ago Microsoft announced that it will soon be including Windows 10 as a mandatory download/patch to Windows 7 & 8, so here are the precautions I took: Bought a new hard drive for each computer, same size as the one I bought this summer, cloned Win 7 from C: to it. This is easy to do with a free downloaded program called Macrium Reflect. http://www.macrium.com/reflectfree.aspx > Now I have 2 identical hard drives with bootable copies of Win 7 on each computer, bootable being the important word. If you now download Windows 10 to your C: drive, and it fails, you still have a fully functional identical hard drive with 7 or 8 on it off to the side. Plus you still have your old hard drive in there with your wonky copy of Win 10 on it - we are now about to put that one to use. > > With 2 fully functional hard drives with copies of Win 7 available, you now are safe, so go ahead and download and install Windows 10 on the C: drive over the top of Windows 7. Now you have a functional (for the time being) copy of Win 10 on C:, and another functional hard drive with Win 7 sitting idle off to the side. If you want to guarantee that it cannot get a virus, or get nuked if your neighborhood gets hit by lightning, you can always unplug it from the motherboard. > > Windows 10 has (IMO) all sorts of goofy stuff all over it, so I downloaded and installed Classic Shell; http://www.classicshell.net/ > Now Win 10 looks and superficially functions like a cross between Windows 7 and Windows XP. Very user friendly, all you have done is put Windows 10 into a different skin while keeping all the serious grunt of Windows 10. And in spite of it's flaws, Windows 10 does have some serious grunt. Until it goes wonky... > > Now fire up Macrium Reflect and clone your newly tweaked C: copy of Windows 10 to your third (new) hard drive. You now have back ups for any eventuality. If Windows 10 on your C: drive fails, you can swap it out with either of your back ups, and you have lost nothing but maybe the last few days of work or pictures. (I have a schedule where I reclone the C: drive to my 10 clone (L) drive every week. Macrium Reflect will do this) > > I included a screen shot of the drives in my computer so you can see how they are named. I strongly recommend you do this: right click and rename the various hard drives before you start to clone them, or sure as sin, you'll clone a blank drive over a good one, and lose everything. MAKE SURE YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING. A mistake here is fatal. > > Maybe this sounds like a lot of trouble, but I have 25 years worth of pictures, sermons and family history documents on my 'puter, and $120 for a couple of spare hard drives is cheap compared to trying to get all that stuff back if/when Microsoft's latest crapware fails on me. Especially since I have already learned the hard way that it is easier to spend a couple hours backing your computer up than spending a week recovering it after it crashes. > > PS: If you like poking around in your computer, all this stuff will be obvious. If you have never poked around inside your computer and these instructions are not completely obvious to you, this is not a good place to start. The learning curve will leave you with an erased and non-functioning computer. Go away and pretend you never read any of this. > > -------- > Richard Pike > Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > Kingsport, TN 3TN0 > > Would you consider yourself to be a good person? > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWcDXT6pH7A > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452845#452845 > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/hds_medium_764.jpg > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: posts
From: Herb <Herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Date: Feb 15, 2016
I have likely said this before... and I agree with Bro Pike....just a different view.... there are several ways to rid oneself of the nuisance that is/can be Microsoft... Setting up Linux Mint 17.3 in a dual boot environment is one way... Presumably windows will never kill your Linux partition..?? Then again...win 10 may prohibit dual boot hard drives? Nothing wrong with win XP either... For most of the things we do with computers....it is fine... If you email and browse...then just about anything that can run Firefox and Mozilla Thunderbird email is fine... Tons of programs out there for photo manipulation and video viewing... Internet speed is very slow compared to the speed of the processor that is inside the PC.. so that should never be an issue...for the average user... The other thing I am hearing is that win 10 is a bit nosey and seems to collect more user data... never a good thing!! Billions of dollars to be made in user data...habits...etc...witness google...and Microsoft has not failed to notice.. Never keep valuables on you computer...buy the 60 buck , 1 terra byte usb drive(wal mart) and drag and drop or copy and past your goodies to it... All of these , advertised, online storage places are a rip!! Full hard drive back up software usually comes pre loaded..if that is your need.. Linux Mint has 17,000+ free soft ware packages...that are easy to download and install...just find the package that you want...and click install...thats it!! http://www.linuxmint.com/ and to top it off...there is a program , called Wine, which allows one(as opposed to "you" ) :-) to run windows programs ... I use it to run my favored, Genealogy program... On the Kolb side...selling has been slow... very little interest in my Firefly...no one is buying boats either...have a barn full of those...nor cars...have several of those for sale... Herb in Ky, no pillow over my head!! On 02/15/2016 10:35 AM, Richard Pike wrote: > > Since it is a very slow 2 weeks, and people are concerned - rightly - about the change over to Windows 10, and I am bored (And it is sleeting with freezing rain outside)... Non Kolb topic follows: > > I went to Windows 10 last spring from Windows 7, it worked great for several months, then went into endless boot mode. The wife's computer (Win 10) soon followed suit. Neither could be made to boot or behave. > > Here is how I retrieved all the data: (both the wife & I are using desktops with room for several hard drives) went to Best Buy and purchased a new hard drive for each 'puter, be sure that the drive you buy is at least as big or bigger than your current drive, this will be important later. Make this new drive your C: drive. Loaded the new drives for each 'puter with their respective copies of Windows 7. Now I could retrieve all our files: boot into Win7, access the wonky Win10 drive which is still plugged into your motherboard, but is no longer C:, copy all your files and pictures back into your fresh copy of 7 on C:. Now you have recovered all your stuff, your are back on good ol' stable Windows 7, and you have a spare hard drive in your computer with a dud copy of Windows 10 on it. Leave it there: you will be using it soon. > > Two weeks ago Microsoft announced that it will soon be including Windows 10 as a mandatory download/patch to Windows 7 & 8, so here are the precautions I took: Bought a new hard drive for each computer, same size as the one I bought this summer, cloned Win 7 from C: to it. This is easy to do with a free downloaded program called Macrium Reflect. http://www.macrium.com/reflectfree.aspx > Now I have 2 identical hard drives with bootable copies of Win 7 on each computer, bootable being the important word. If you now download Windows 10 to your C: drive, and it fails, you still have a fully functional identical hard drive with 7 or 8 on it off to the side. Plus you still have your old hard drive in there with your wonky copy of Win 10 on it - we are now about to put that one to use. > > With 2 fully functional hard drives with copies of Win 7 available, you now are safe, so go ahead and download and install Windows 10 on the C: drive over the top of Windows 7. Now you have a functional (for the time being) copy of Win 10 on C:, and another functional hard drive with Win 7 sitting idle off to the side. If you want to guarantee that it cannot get a virus, or get nuked if your neighborhood gets hit by lightning, you can always unplug it from the motherboard. > > Windows 10 has (IMO) all sorts of goofy stuff all over it, so I downloaded and installed Classic Shell; http://www.classicshell.net/ > Now Win 10 looks and superficially functions like a cross between Windows 7 and Windows XP. Very user friendly, all you have done is put Windows 10 into a different skin while keeping all the serious grunt of Windows 10. And in spite of it's flaws, Windows 10 does have some serious grunt. Until it goes wonky... > > Now fire up Macrium Reflect and clone your newly tweaked C: copy of Windows 10 to your third (new) hard drive. You now have back ups for any eventuality. If Windows 10 on your C: drive fails, you can swap it out with either of your back ups, and you have lost nothing but maybe the last few days of work or pictures. (I have a schedule where I reclone the C: drive to my 10 clone (L) drive every week. Macrium Reflect will do this) > > I included a screen shot of the drives in my computer so you can see how they are named. I strongly recommend you do this: right click and rename the various hard drives before you start to clone them, or sure as sin, you'll clone a blank drive over a good one, and lose everything. MAKE SURE YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING. A mistake here is fatal. > > Maybe this sounds like a lot of trouble, but I have 25 years worth of pictures, sermons and family history documents on my 'puter, and $120 for a couple of spare hard drives is cheap compared to trying to get all that stuff back if/when Microsoft's latest crapware fails on me. Especially since I have already learned the hard way that it is easier to spend a couple hours backing your computer up than spending a week recovering it after it crashes. > > PS: If you like poking around in your computer, all this stuff will be obvious. If you have never poked around inside your computer and these instructions are not completely obvious to you, this is not a good place to start. The learning curve will leave you with an erased and non-functioning computer. Go away and pretend you never read any of this. > > -------- > Richard Pike > Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > Kingsport, TN 3TN0 > > Would you consider yourself to be a good person? > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWcDXT6pH7A > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452845#452845 > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/hds_medium_764.jpg > > -- Signature text; ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: posts
From: kinne russ <russk50(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 15, 2016
Good advice from bother Herb, sorry his FFC has;t sold yet. Use a separate HD to store backups etc. Much safer Sorry to hear of the troubles with Windows, but thats nothing new. Sure glad Im on a Mac. Whats a virus? Ive never had one Russ K > On Feb 15, 2016, at 1:03 PM, Herb wrote: > > > I have likely said this before... and I agree with Bro Pike....just a different view.... > > there are several ways to rid oneself of the nuisance that is/can be Microsoft... Setting up Linux Mint 17.3 in a dual boot environment is one way... Presumably windows will never kill your Linux partition..?? Then again...win 10 may prohibit dual boot hard drives? Nothing wrong with win XP either... For most of the things we do with computers....it is fine... If you email and browse...then just about anything that can run Firefox and Mozilla Thunderbird email is fine... Tons of programs out there for photo manipulation and video viewing... Internet speed is very slow compared to the speed of the processor that is inside the PC.. so that should never be an issue...for the average user... > > The other thing I am hearing is that win 10 is a bit nosey and seems to collect more user data... never a good thing!! Billions of dollars to be made in user data...habits...etc...witness google...and Microsoft has not failed to notice.. > > Never keep valuables on you computer...buy the 60 buck , 1 terra byte usb drive(wal mart) and drag and drop or copy and past your goodies to it... All of these , advertised, online storage places are a rip!! Full hard drive back up software usually comes pre loaded..if that is your need.. > > Linux Mint has 17,000+ free soft ware packages...that are easy to download and install...just find the package that you want...and click install...thats it!! > > http://www.linuxmint.com/ > > and to top it off...there is a program , called Wine, which allows one(as opposed to "you" ) :-) to run windows programs ... I use it to run my favored, Genealogy program... > > > On the Kolb side...selling has been slow... very little interest in my Firefly...no one is buying boats either...have a barn full of those...nor cars...have several of those for sale... Herb in Ky, no pillow over my head!! > > > > On 02/15/2016 10:35 AM, Richard Pike wrote: >> >> Since it is a very slow 2 weeks, and people are concerned - rightly - about the change over to Windows 10, and I am bored (And it is sleeting with freezing rain outside)... Non Kolb topic follows: >> >> I went to Windows 10 last spring from Windows 7, it worked great for several months, then went into endless boot mode. The wife's computer (Win 10) soon followed suit. Neither could be made to boot or behave. >> >> Here is how I retrieved all the data: (both the wife & I are using desktops with room for several hard drives) went to Best Buy and purchased a new hard drive for each 'puter, be sure that the drive you buy is at least as big or bigger than your current drive, this will be important later. Make this new drive your C: drive. Loaded the new drives for each 'puter with their respective copies of Windows 7. Now I could retrieve all our files: boot into Win7, access the wonky Win10 drive which is still plugged into your motherboard, but is no longer C:, copy all your files and pictures back into your fresh copy of 7 on C:. Now you have recovered all your stuff, your are back on good ol' stable Windows 7, and you have a spare hard drive in your computer with a dud copy of Windows 10 on it. Leave it there: you will be using it soon. >> >> Two weeks ago Microsoft announced that it will soon be including Windows 10 as a mandatory download/patch to Windows 7 & 8, so here are the precautions I took: Bought a new hard drive for each computer, same size as the one I bought this summer, cloned Win 7 from C: to it. This is easy to do with a free downloaded program called Macrium Reflect. http://www.macrium.com/reflectfree.aspx >> Now I have 2 identical hard drives with bootable copies of Win 7 on each computer, bootable being the important word. If you now download Windows 10 to your C: drive, and it fails, you still have a fully functional identical hard drive with 7 or 8 on it off to the side. Plus you still have your old hard drive in there with your wonky copy of Win 10 on it - we are now about to put that one to use. >> >> With 2 fully functional hard drives with copies of Win 7 available, you now are safe, so go ahead and download and install Windows 10 on the C: drive over the top of Windows 7. Now you have a functional (for the time being) copy of Win 10 on C:, and another functional hard drive with Win 7 sitting idle off to the side. If you want to guarantee that it cannot get a virus, or get nuked if your neighborhood gets hit by lightning, you can always unplug it from the motherboard. >> >> Windows 10 has (IMO) all sorts of goofy stuff all over it, so I downloaded and installed Classic Shell; http://www.classicshell.net/ >> Now Win 10 looks and superficially functions like a cross between Windows 7 and Windows XP. Very user friendly, all you have done is put Windows 10 into a different skin while keeping all the serious grunt of Windows 10. And in spite of it's flaws, Windows 10 does have some serious grunt. Until it goes wonky... >> >> Now fire up Macrium Reflect and clone your newly tweaked C: copy of Windows 10 to your third (new) hard drive. You now have back ups for any eventuality. If Windows 10 on your C: drive fails, you can swap it out with either of your back ups, and you have lost nothing but maybe the last few days of work or pictures. (I have a schedule where I reclone the C: drive to my 10 clone (L) drive every week. Macrium Reflect will do this) >> >> I included a screen shot of the drives in my computer so you can see how they are named. I strongly recommend you do this: right click and rename the various hard drives before you start to clone them, or sure as sin, you'll clone a blank drive over a good one, and lose everything. MAKE SURE YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING. A mistake here is fatal. >> >> Maybe this sounds like a lot of trouble, but I have 25 years worth of pictures, sermons and family history documents on my 'puter, and $120 for a couple of spare hard drives is cheap compared to trying to get all that stuff back if/when Microsoft's latest crapware fails on me. Especially since I have already learned the hard way that it is easier to spend a couple hours backing your computer up than spending a week recovering it after it crashes. >> >> PS: If you like poking around in your computer, all this stuff will be obvious. If you have never poked around inside your computer and these instructions are not completely obvious to you, this is not a good place to start. The learning curve will leave you with an erased and non-functioning computer. Go away and pretend you never read any of this. >> >> -------- >> Richard Pike >> Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) >> Kingsport, TN 3TN0 >> >> Would you consider yourself to be a good person? >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWcDXT6pH7A >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452845#452845 >> >> >> >> >> Attachments: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com//files/hds_medium_764.jpg >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > Signature text; > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WhiskeyVictor36(at)aol.com
Date: Feb 15, 2016
Subject: Re: posts
greybaron, Glad you included this comment at the end of your explanation, since I don't know much about computers. I do have windows 10 which so far has been working ok for me. Bill Varnes Original FireStar First flight 1994 so I guess that puts me at almost 20 years flying it. Me? 79 yo. In a message dated 2/15/2016 11:38:49 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, thegreybaron(at)charter.net writes: If you have never poked around inside your computer and these instructions are not completely obvious to you, this is not a good place to start. The learning curve will leave you with an erased and non-functioning computer. Go away and pretend you never read any of this. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: 582 Radiator Advice
From: "ThermalHunter" <thermal_hunter2002(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Feb 15, 2016
I just replace my Rotax 503 with a 582 on my Firestar II. I am looking for advice on what radiator to use. Thanks -------- Robert G Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452873#452873 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: posts
From: "Richard Pike" <thegreybaron(at)charter.net>
Date: Feb 15, 2016
ceengland7(at)gmail.com wrote: > Thanks for writing up the process, but I have a question. > > Where did you see that Win10 is going to be a *mandatory* update to 7? I > don't want to boot my -7 computers one day & discover that they've been > converted to tablets. (I'd consider 10 a 'mandatory' update for 8, just > to have a functional computer....) > > Thanks, > > Charlie > > Stuff like this: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2993381/windows/windows-10-upgrades-reportedly-appearing-as-mandatory-for-some-users.html http://www.ign.com/articles/2015/10/15/windows-10-upgrade-has-become-mandatory-for-some-users http://betanews.com/2016/02/01/microsoft-makes-windows-10-a-recommended-update-for-windows-7-and-8-1-users/ So yes, you can hold it at bay, but MS is pushing it hard. Depending on your settings, you may get surprised. -------- Richard Pike Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Kingsport, TN 3TN0 Would you consider yourself to be a good person? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWcDXT6pH7A Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452876#452876 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 582 Radiator Advice
From: "Richard Pike" <thegreybaron(at)charter.net>
Date: Feb 15, 2016
Here is what Rotax recommends according to CPS: https://www.cps-parts.com/catalog/rtxpages/cps15-04302.php?clickkey=1517555 Note the dimensions: 11" X 11" x 1.25". That is the one thing you need to know, other than that CPS gets $425 for it and the plumbing fittings come out at inconvenient places; the top one points down and the bottom one is on the wrong side. If you mount it on the back of your cage, it is helpful if both plumbing fittings come out facing aft, (and up, or at least not down) with the one by the right wing at the top of the radiator, and the one by the left wing at the bottom of the radiator. That makes plumbing it up so much easier. Now you can go to your friendly local motorcycle salvage yard and see if they have a good clean radiator that is at least 11" x 11" x 1.5" that has the plumbing coming out at convenient places and they want a fair price for it. Or you can go to ebay and get something like this: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Motorcycle-Replacement-Aluminum-Radiator-Cooler-Cooling-For-BENELLI-TREK-899-New-/141419647261?hash=item20ed44911d:g:X-gAAOSwRLZUErZ0&vxp=mtr It looks like it might fit, the plumbing is in the right place, and it looks big enough. Your call. But this is the general idea. -------- Richard Pike Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Kingsport, TN 3TN0 Would you consider yourself to be a good person? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWcDXT6pH7A Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452877#452877 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: posts
From: Charlie England <ceengland7(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 15, 2016
On 2/15/2016 6:56 PM, Richard Pike wrote: > > > ceengland7(at)gmail.com wrote: >> Thanks for writing up the process, but I have a question. >> >> Where did you see that Win10 is going to be a *mandatory* update to 7? I >> don't want to boot my -7 computers one day & discover that they've been >> converted to tablets. (I'd consider 10 a 'mandatory' update for 8, just >> to have a functional computer....) >> >> Thanks, >> >> Charlie >> >> > > Stuff like this: > http://www.pcworld.com/article/2993381/windows/windows-10-upgrades-reportedly-appearing-as-mandatory-for-some-users.html > http://www.ign.com/articles/2015/10/15/windows-10-upgrade-has-become-mandatory-for-some-users > http://betanews.com/2016/02/01/microsoft-makes-windows-10-a-recommended-update-for-windows-7-and-8-1-users/ > > So yes, you can hold it at bay, but MS is pushing it hard. Depending on your settings, you may get surprised. > > -------- > Richard Pike > Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > Kingsport, TN 3TN0 Well, I never let MS update anything (or even download) automatically, so I'm reasonably confident I can hold them off. I won't be surprised to see MS get embroiled in some major lawsuits if they continue down this path. Charlie ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: posts
From: Bradley Nation <nationcap(at)comcast.net>
Date: Feb 15, 2016
How is this related to Kolb let alone airplanes? There isnt even a token mention of MS flight simulator. > On Feb 15, 2016, at 21:18 , Charlie England wrote: > > > On 2/15/2016 6:56 PM, Richard Pike wrote: >> >> >> ceengland7(at)gmail.com wrote: >>> Thanks for writing up the process, but I have a question. >>> >>> Where did you see that Win10 is going to be a *mandatory* update to 7? I >>> don't want to boot my -7 computers one day & discover that they've been >>> converted to tablets. (I'd consider 10 a 'mandatory' update for 8, just >>> to have a functional computer....) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Charlie >>> >>> >> >> Stuff like this: >> http://www.pcworld.com/article/2993381/windows/windows-10-upgrades-reportedly-appearing-as-mandatory-for-some-users.html >> http://www.ign.com/articles/2015/10/15/windows-10-upgrade-has-become-mandatory-for-some-users >> http://betanews.com/2016/02/01/microsoft-makes-windows-10-a-recommended-update-for-windows-7-and-8-1-users/ >> >> So yes, you can hold it at bay, but MS is pushing it hard. Depending on your settings, you may get surprised. >> >> -------- >> Richard Pike >> Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) >> Kingsport, TN 3TN0 > Well, I never let MS update anything (or even download) automatically, so I'm reasonably confident I can hold them off. I won't be surprised to see MS get embroiled in some major lawsuits if they continue down this path. > > Charlie > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Short Field Landings
From: "FiascoDave" <FiascoDave(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 15, 2016
Allan, May I ask what video app did you use to film your short field landings work with that gave real-time airspeed, track etc? Thanx, Dave -------- Ciao, FiascoDave Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452882#452882 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Bob Green <bgreen(at)bimi.org>
Date: Feb 16, 2016
Subject: Re: Kolb-List Digest: 19 Msgs - 02/15/16
No sales due to everyone waiting for the change or deletion of the third class medical. Many are waiting so they can buy a manufactured airplane... Maybe. Just my opinion. B Green Kolb Mark 3X project. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 16, 2016
Subject: Re: posts
From: Denny Baber <baberdk(at)gmail.com>
Here is one way to prevent Windows 10 since they made it a virus. http://www.howtogeek.com/228551/how-to-stop-windows-7-or-8-from-downloading-windows-10-automatically/ Respectfully, Dennis Baber (305) 814-7218 baberdk(at)gmail.com Connection - Compassion - Control ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Fuel tank options Mk3
From: "FiascoDave" <FiascoDave(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 16, 2016
I've got a mk3 with three 5 gal plastic tanks side-by-side mount on shelf above boom. Problem? Having to refill 3 tanks...very near and above electrical components, battery...inside of fuselage. Does anyone have a single tank solution? Fiberglass, steel or aluminum? Or a single manifold for refueling over the wing? Thanx, Dave -southern Oregon -------- Ciao, FiascoDave Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452902#452902 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Lukehart" <llukehart(at)heartofiowa.net>
Subject: Unable to open Kolb Matronics list
Date: Feb 16, 2016
I am registered as a member but the site will not accept my name or password ?? It will not accept my request to confirm my name and password either !! I have tried for several days to open so I can post questions concerning the purchase of a Kolb Firestar but am unable !! Can you please suggest any help ?? Thank You Larry L. Lukehart ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 16, 2016
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Unable to open Kolb Matronics list
Looks good to me. Ask what you need. Bill Sullivan Windsor Locks, Ct. On Tue, 2/16/16, Larry Lukehart wrote: Subject: Kolb-List: Unable to open Kolb Matronics list To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Date: Tuesday, February 16, 2016, 12:37 PM I am registered as a member but the site will not accept my name or password ?? It will not accept my request to confirm my name and password either !! I have tried for several days to open so I can post questions concerning the purchase of a Kolb Firestar but am unable !! Can you please suggest any help ?? Thank You Larry L. Lukehart ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Short Field Landings
From: "olendorf" <olendorf(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 16, 2016
I tried to find the boring part but was unable. I was surprised at the amount of tailwheeel flutter at 3:19. I guess that's why we use springs. -------- Scott Olendorf Original Firestar, Rotax 447, Powerfin prop Schenectady, NY http://sites.google.com/site/kolbfirestar/ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452904#452904 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fuel tank options Mk3
From: "Richard Pike" <thegreybaron(at)charter.net>
Date: Feb 16, 2016
Made this arrangement out of Epoxy and glass cloth, has worked good for many years. Don't put ethanol into it, or you'll get to make it twice. http://oh2fly.net/oldpoops/pg1.htm -------- Richard Pike Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Kingsport, TN 3TN0 Would you consider yourself to be a good person? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWcDXT6pH7A Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452905#452905 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Lukehart" <llukehart(at)heartofiowa.net>
Subject: Kolb
Date: Feb 16, 2016
Can anyone send me the email address of the fella in Hastings Minn. that has the Kolb for sale,, I'm in the market for purchasing one !! I can't open on send on the Matronics list even tho I'm listed as a new member,,, don't know why I can't open for posts !! ?? Thank You Larry L. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 16, 2016
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb
I don't have his address, but you seem to be posting just fine. -------------------------------------------- On Tue, 2/16/16, Larry Lukehart wrote: Subject: Kolb-List: Kolb To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Date: Tuesday, February 16, 2016, 12:59 PM Can anyone send me the email address of the fella in Hastings Minn. that has the Kolb for sale,, I'm in the market for purchasing one !! I can't open on send on the Matronics list even tho I'm listed as a new member,,, don't know why I can't open for posts !! ?? Thank You Larry L. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Lukehart" <llukehart(at)heartofiowa.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb
Date: Feb 16, 2016
OK Bill,,, Thanks for your help and response !! Regards Larry L. ----- Original Message ----- From: "william sullivan" <williamtsullivan(at)att.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 12:02 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Kolb > > > I don't have his address, but you seem to be posting just fine. > > > -------------------------------------------- > On Tue, 2/16/16, Larry Lukehart wrote: > > Subject: Kolb-List: Kolb > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Tuesday, February 16, 2016, 12:59 PM > > > Can anyone send me the > email address of the fella > in Hastings Minn. > > that has the Kolb for > sale,, > > I'm in the market for > purchasing one > !! > > I can't open on send on > the Matronics list even tho > I'm listed as a new > > member,,, don't know > why I can't open for posts !! > ?? > > Thank You > Larry L. > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Fuel tank options Mk3
Date: Feb 16, 2016
Got a 25 gal 5052 aluminum fuel tank secured in what is the normal open area behind the cockpit. One of a kind. Fuel through the center section. Opens up the area below, which is normally filled up with two 5 gal tanks, for cargo compartment. Built an 18 gal 5052 aluminum fuel tank for my Firestar (Original). Same configuration as my MKIII. Tank up top and cargo compartment below. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of FiascoDave Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 11:09 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Fuel tank options Mk3 I've got a mk3 with three 5 gal plastic tanks side-by-side mount on shelf above boom. Problem? Having to refill 3 tanks...very near and above electrical components, battery...inside of fuselage. Does anyone have a single tank solution? Fiberglass, steel or aluminum? Or a single manifold for refueling over the wing? Thanx, Dave -southern Oregon -------- Ciao, FiascoDave Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452902#452902 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fuel tank options Mk3
From: "Shadow94" <seanote(at)echoes.net>
Date: Feb 16, 2016
I was able to come across a used dune buggy fuel tank, but the owner put me onto this site for his original purchase. http://www.pacificcustoms.com/round_poly_fuel_tanks.html Seems like they have all the fixin's -------- Mark Twinstar MKII Great Bend, PA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452908#452908 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/kolb_cover_job_002_164.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Kolb
From: "west1m" <west1m(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 16, 2016
I must be the one in Hastings Email west1m at Hotmail . Com There are some pics at West1m.Com. under flying -------- West1m Hastings, MN Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452910#452910 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 16, 2016
Subject: Re: Fuel tank options Mk3
From: Rick Neilsen <neilsenrm(at)gmail.com>
Dave I have a single manifold (boat fuel filler/cap) under the wing on the side of the fuselage just behind the doors of my MKIIIC that I use to fill my two 5 gallon fuel tanks. Also, ANY software don't install a early version. Installed Windows 10 on three of my computers works great. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIC On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:09 PM, FiascoDave wrote: > > I've got a mk3 with three 5 gal plastic tanks side-by-side mount on shelf > above boom. > > Problem? Having to refill 3 tanks...very near and above electrical > components, battery...inside of fuselage. > > Does anyone have a single tank solution? Fiberglass, steel or aluminum? > > Or a single manifold for refueling over the wing? > > Thanx, > > Dave -southern Oregon > > -------- > Ciao, > > FiascoDave > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452902#452902 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Kolb
From: "Watkinsdw" <david.watkins0(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 17, 2016
Hi, Luke, I have a beautiful MkIII Classic with a 100 hp. Rotax 912 for sale. I'm about to post it on Barnstormers for a reduced price of $19,900. If you'd like to see a video of the walk-around inspection, click on this link: http://youtu.be/dwpU42ViVDA Dave Watkins Pompano Beach, FL 954-608-5423 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452917#452917 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Kolb
From: "Watkinsdw" <david.watkins0(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 17, 2016
Hi, Luke, I have a beautiful MkIII Classic with a 100 hp. Rotax 912 for sale. I'm about to post it on Barnstormers for a reduced price of $19,900. If you'd like to see a video of the walk-around inspection, click on this link: http://youtu.be/dwpU42ViVDA Dave Watkins Pompano Beach, FL 954-608-5423 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452918#452918 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Lukehart" <llukehart(at)heartofiowa.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb
Date: Feb 17, 2016
Good Morning Dave, Thanks for the early on "heads up" response but I am only interested in a single place and not wanting to spend that much for one,,, I have no doubt your Mark III is beautiful but it's more than I'm looking for,,, Thanks again Larry L. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Watkinsdw" <david.watkins0(at)gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 6:43 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb > > Hi, Luke, > I have a beautiful MkIII Classic with a 100 hp. Rotax 912 for sale. I'm > about to post it on Barnstormers for a reduced price of $19,900. If you'd > like to see a video of the walk-around inspection, click on this link: > http://youtu.be/dwpU42ViVDA > Dave Watkins > Pompano Beach, FL > 954-608-5423 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452918#452918 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 17, 2016
From: Bill Berle <victorbravo(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Newbie Alert, Bought Kit: Take me to school on the Firestar
II please Greetings from Los Angeles. I just made an arrangement to purchase a partly built Firestar II kit. Don't have it here yet (couple of weeks probably). I am seeking information and experiences from experienced Kolbers in several areas. I am certain that a lot of information is in the archives, but I am new to the Matronics lists and I have no experience with where to find the specific types of things I'm looking for. Absolutely no disrespect or laziness intended: I'm SURE that many of my questions have been answered over and over before... but I really don't want to sort through thousands of pages of general discussion and "I flew to X place today" information before finding the relevant answer. All help in navigating quickly to the right information is greatly appreciated. The questions that I already know that I want answers to are: 1) What are the known issues, problems, inaccuracies, common mistakes, and things to avoid when building this kit? 2) What are the (mechanical, aerodynamic, structural) upgrades, tweaks, hacks, and modifications if any that are known to be worthwhile and desirable to have? 3) What are the upgrades, tweaks, modifications and "improvements" that people have tried which did not work, caused problems, or wasted time? About me: Age: Old enough to know that The Riddler is Frank Gorshin and not Jim Carrey :) Pilot: approx 1800 hours TT, First Solo 1977, private pilot rating, airplane and glider Owned Aircraft: RV-3, Taylorcraft (4), J-3, Cessna 172 "straight tail" (current), Cassutt F-1 Racer (Race #81, Reno 1988-89) Owned Sailplanes: Mini-Nimbus, AS-W20, AS-W20BL, Ventus B-16.6 (contest # VB, 1981-87, 2 FAI speed records, 1984) Graduated A&P Mechanic college program 1983 (still haven't taken the FAA test) Holder of FAA STC-PMA manufacturing approval for a safety/performance upgrade product on numerous certified aircraft Interest in Kolb: My interest in the Kolb has happened only recently. When I first saw them way back when, I disliked the looks of the design compared to traditional aircraft. The flat bottom airfoil (all too similar to my old Eagle 63 R/C models), and the harsh angular shape of the fuselage lines, didn't agree with me. Over time and with a lot of water under the bridge, my flying desires and realistic needs changed. I took a second look at the Kolb with a fresh set of eyes and an open mind, and I finally realized the brilliance behind many of the Kolb's features. My desire to have a low and slow airplane had to also address the fact that it had to fit in a T-hangar along with the larger 172. So the Kolb folding wings is a make-or-break item. The placement of the tube spar in the wing, behind the max. thickness point, had initially annoyed me all to hell, until I learned from a senior level engineer that this unusual placement balanced out the forces between the torsion/twisting moment of the wing and the lifting moment. Anyway, I am very thankful for answers and information from the members of this mail list. I'll be glad to provide more information about what I will be using the Firestar for and why/where I will be flying it if anyone is interested. Bill Berle Whiteman Airport, Los Angles, CA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Newbie Alert, Bought Kit: Take me to school on the Firestar
II please
Date: Feb 17, 2016
Homer Kolb was a brilliant aircraft designer, among many, many other talents. On top of that he was a true gentleman and a very good friend. I've built and flown a few Kolb models. Still flying my MKIII I built in 1991. It has nearly twice as many flight hours as you have. No one else has ever flown my MKIII. Welcome to the Kolb List. If you have a question that I can answer, I'll be glad to try and answer it. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Berle Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 5:17 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Newbie Alert, Bought Kit: Take me to school on the Firestar II please Greetings from Los Angeles. I just made an arrangement to purchase a partly built Firestar II kit. Don't have it here yet (couple of weeks probably). I am seeking information and experiences from experienced Kolbers in several areas. I am certain that a lot of information is in the archives, but I am new to the Matronics lists and I have no experience with where to find the specific types of things I'm looking for. Absolutely no disrespect or laziness intended: I'm SURE that many of my questions have been answered over and over before... but I really don't want to sort through thousands of pages of general discussion and "I flew to X place today" information before finding the relevant answer. All help in navigating quickly to the right information is greatly appreciated. The questions that I already know that I want answers to are: 1) What are the known issues, problems, inaccuracies, common mistakes, and things to avoid when building this kit? 2) What are the (mechanical, aerodynamic, structural) upgrades, tweaks, hacks, and modifications if any that are known to be worthwhile and desirable to have? 3) What are the upgrades, tweaks, modifications and "improvements" that people have tried which did not work, caused problems, or wasted time? About me: Age: Old enough to know that The Riddler is Frank Gorshin and not Jim Carrey :) Pilot: approx 1800 hours TT, First Solo 1977, private pilot rating, airplane and glider Owned Aircraft: RV-3, Taylorcraft (4), J-3, Cessna 172 "straight tail" (current), Cassutt F-1 Racer (Race #81, Reno 1988-89) Owned Sailplanes: Mini-Nimbus, AS-W20, AS-W20BL, Ventus B-16.6 (contest # VB, 1981-87, 2 FAI speed records, 1984) Graduated A&P Mechanic college program 1983 (still haven't taken the FAA test) Holder of FAA STC-PMA manufacturing approval for a safety/performance upgrade product on numerous certified aircraft Interest in Kolb: My interest in the Kolb has happened only recently. When I first saw them way back when, I disliked the looks of the design compared to traditional aircraft. The flat bottom airfoil (all too similar to my old Eagle 63 R/C models), and the harsh angular shape of the fuselage lines, didn't agree with me. Over time and with a lot of water under the bridge, my flying desires and realistic needs changed. I took a second look at the Kolb with a fresh set of eyes and an open mind, and I finally realized the brilliance behind many of the Kolb's features. My desire to have a low and slow airplane had to also address the fact that it had to fit in a T-hangar along with the larger 172. So the Kolb folding wings is a make-or-break item. The placement of the tube spar in the wing, behind the max. thickness point, had initially annoyed me all to hell, until I learned from a senior level engineer that this unusual placement balanced out the forces between the torsion/twisting moment of the! wing and the lifting moment. Anyway, I am very thankful for answers and information from the members of this mail list. I'll be glad to provide more information about what I will be using the Firestar for and why/where I will be flying it if anyone is interested. Bill Berle Whiteman Airport, Los Angles, CA ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 18, 2016
From: Bill Berle <victorbravo(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Newbie Alert, Bought Kit: Take me to school on the Firestar
II please John, I just saw something where you mentioned a "Hauck landing gear" on the Kolb archives. Did you make a taller or different landing gear for a Kolb? I want to put taller legs on mine in order to have a better ground angle for STOL work. Among other STOL mods. Bill Berle www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and for-profit entities -------------------------------------------- On Wed, 2/17/16, John Hauck wrote: Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Newbie Alert, Bought Kit: Take me to school on the Firestar II please To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Date: Wednesday, February 17, 2016, 3:44 PM "John Hauck" Homer Kolb was a brilliant aircraft designer, among many, many other talents. On top of that he was a true gentleman and a very good friend. I've built and flown a few Kolb models. Still flying my MKIII I built in 1991. It has nearly twice as many flight hours as you have. No one else has ever flown my MKIII. Welcome to the Kolb List. If you have a question that I can answer, I'll be glad to try and answer it. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Berle Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 5:17 PM To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Kolb-List: Newbie Alert, Bought Kit: Take me to school on the Firestar II please Greetings from Los Angeles. I just made an arrangement to purchase a partly built Firestar II kit. Don't have it here yet (couple of weeks probably). I am seeking information and experiences from experienced Kolbers in several areas. I am certain that a lot of information is in the archives, but I am new to the Matronics lists and I have no experience with where to find the specific types of things I'm looking for. Absolutely no disrespect or laziness intended: I'm SURE that many of my questions have been answered over and over before... but I really don't want to sort through thousands of pages of general discussion and "I flew to X place today" information before finding the relevant answer. All help in navigating quickly to the right information is greatly appreciated. The questions that I already know that I want answers to are: 1) What are the known issues, problems, inaccuracies, common mistakes, and things to avoid when building this kit? 2) What are the (mechanical, aerodynamic, structural) upgrades, tweaks, hacks, and modifications if any that are known to be worthwhile and desirable to have? 3) What are the upgrades, tweaks, modifications and "improvements" that people have tried which did not work, caused problems, or wasted time? About me: Age: Old enough to know that The Riddler is Frank Gorshin and not Jim Carrey :) Pilot: approx 1800 hours TT, First Solo 1977, private pilot rating, airplane and glider Owned Aircraft: RV-3, Taylorcraft (4), J-3, Cessna 172 "straight tail" (current), Cassutt F-1 Racer (Race #81, Reno 1988-89) Owned Sailplanes: Mini-Nimbus, AS-W20, AS-W20BL, Ventus B-16.6 (contest # VB, 1981-87, 2 FAI speed records, 1984) Graduated A&P Mechanic college program 1983 (still haven't taken the FAA test) Holder of FAA STC-PMA manufacturing approval for a safety/performance upgrade product on numerous certified aircraft Interest in Kolb: My interest in the Kolb has happened only recently. When I first saw them way back when, I disliked the looks of the design compared to traditional aircraft. The flat bottom airfoil (all too similar to my old Eagle 63 R/C models), and the harsh angular shape of the fuselage lines, didn't agree with me. Over time and with a lot of water under the bridge, my flying desires and realistic needs changed. I took a second look at the Kolb with a fresh set of eyes and an open mind, and I finally realized the brilliance behind many of the Kolb's features. My desire to have a low and slow airplane had to also address the fact that it had to fit in a T-hangar along with the larger 172. So the Kolb folding wings is a make-or-break item. The placement of the tube spar in the wing, behind the max. thickness point, had initially annoyed me all to hell, until I learned from a senior level engineer that this unusual placement balanced out the forces between the torsion/twisting moment of the! wing and the lifting moment. Anyway, I am very thankful for answers and information from the members of this mail list. I'll be glad to provide more information about what I will be using the Firestar for and why/where I will be flying it if anyone is interested. Bill Berle Whiteman Airport, Los Angles, CA Lists This Month -- Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!) Raiser. Click on more about Gifts provided www.buildersbooks.com -Matt Dralle, List Admin. Forum - - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - List Contribution Web Site - -Matt Dralle, List Admin. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 17, 2016
From: Jim Baker <jimbaker(at)npacc.net>
Subject: Re: Newbie Alert, Bought Kit: Take me to school on the Firestar
II please QWxsIHJpYiBub3NlcyBhbmQgZmFsc2UgcmliIG5vc2VzIHNob3VsZCBiZSBjaGVja2VkIHRvIGVu c3VyZSB0aGV5IGZhaXIgaW50by9iZWxvdyB0aGUgZmFicmljIHByb3Blcmx5LiBZb3UnbGwgbmVl ZCB0byBhbmdsZSBjdXQvZ3JpbmQgdGhlIHR1YmVzIGF0IHRoZSB0aXBzIHRvIGVuc3VyZSBhIGdv b2QgbG9va2luZyBjb3ZlciBqb2IuCgpDb3ZlcmluZyBpcyBtb3N0IGVhc2lseSBkb25lIGJ5IGdl dHRpbmcgc29tZSB0b2JhY2NvIGJhZ3MgKCBzbWFsbCBzdHJpbmctY2xvc2VkIGJhZ3MgKSwgd2Vp Z2h0ZWQgd2l0aCBzYW5kIG9yIHNvbWV0aGluZyBlbHNlLCBhbmQgdGhlbiBodW5nIG9uIHRoZSBl ZGdlcyBvZiB0aGUgZmFicmljICggc3BpbmcgYmluZGVyIGNsaXBzICkgdG8gZHJhcGUgdGhlIGZh YnJpYyBwcm9wZXJseSB0byB0aGUgcHJlLWFkaGVzaXZlZCBmcmFtZS4gV2lsbCBiZWNvbWUgb2J2 aW91cyB3aGVuIHlvdSByZWFkIHRoZSBjb3ZlcmluZyBpbnN0cnVjdGlvbnMuCgpFdmVyeXRoaW5n IGVsc2Ugd2VudCBieSB0aGUgd2VsbCB3cml0dGVuIHBsYW5zLiBObyB1bmR1ZSBzdXJwcmlzZXMu CgoKSmltIEJha2VyCjQwNSA0MjYgNTM3NwoKLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0KRnJv bTogQmlsbCBCZXJsZSA8dmljdG9yYnJhdm9Ac2JjZ2xvYmFsLm5ldD4KVG86IGtvbGItbGlzdEBt YXRyb25pY3MuY29tClNlbnQ6IFdlZCwgMTcgRmViIDIwMTYgMTg6MTcKU3ViamVjdDogS29sYi1M aXN0OiBOZXdiaWUgQWxlcnQsIEJvdWdodCBLaXQ6IFRha2UgbWUgdG8gc2Nob29sIG9uIHRoZSBG aXJlc3RhciBJSSAgcGxlYXNlCgotLT4gS29sYi1MaXN0IG1lc3NhZ2UgcG9zdGVkIGJ5OiBCaWxs IEJlcmxlIDx2aWN0b3JicmF2b0BzYmNnbG9iYWwubmV0PgoKR3JlZXRpbmdzIGZyb20gTG9zIEFu Z2VsZXMuIEkganVzdCBtYWRlIGFuIGFycmFuZ2VtZW50IHRvIHB1cmNoYXNlIGEgcGFydGx5IGJ1 aWx0IEZpcmVzdGFyIElJIGtpdC4gRG9uJ3QgaGF2ZSBpdCBoZXJlIHlldCAoY291cGxlIG9mIHdl ZWtzIHByb2JhYmx5KS4KCkkgYW0gc2Vla2luZyBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBhbmQgZXhwZXJpZW5jZXMg ZnJvbSBleHBlcmllbmNlZCBLb2xiZXJzIGluIHNldmVyYWwgYXJlYXMuIEkgYW0gY2VydGFpbiB0 aGF0IGEgbG90IG9mIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIGlzIGluIHRoZSBhcmNoaXZlcywgYnV0IEkgYW0gbmV3 IHRvIHRoZSBNYXRyb25pY3MgbGlzdHMgYW5kIEkgaGF2ZSBubyBleHBlcmllbmNlIHdpdGggd2hl cmUgdG8gZmluZCB0aGUgc3BlY2lmaWMgdHlwZXMgb2YgdGhpbmdzIEknbSBsb29raW5nIGZvci4g QWJzb2x1dGVseSBubyBkaXNyZXNwZWN0IG9yIGxhemluZXNzIGludGVuZGVkOiBJJ20gU1VSRSB0 aGF0IG1hbnkgb2YgbXkgcXVlc3Rpb25zIGhhdmUgYmVlbiBhbnN3ZXJlZCBvdmVyIGFuZCBvdmVy IGJlZm9yZS4uLiBidXQgSSByZWFsbHkgZG9uJ3Qgd2FudCB0byBzb3J0IHRocm91Z2ggdGhvdXNh bmRzIG9mIHBhZ2VzIG9mIGdlbmVyYWwgZGlzY3Vzc2lvbiBhbmQgIkkgZmxldyB0byBYIHBsYWNl IHRvZGF5IiBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBiZWZvcmUgZmluZGluZyB0aGUgcmVsZXZhbnQgYW5zd2VyLiBB bGwgaGVscCBpbiBuYXZpZ2F0aW5nIHF1aWNrbHkgdG8gdGhlIHJpZ2h0IGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIGlz IGdyZWF0bHkgYXBwcmVjaWF0ZWQuCgpUaGUgcXVlc3Rpb25zIHRoYXQgSSBhbHJlYWR5IGtub3cg dGhhdCBJIHdhbnQgYW5zd2VycyB0byBhcmU6CgoxKSBXaGF0IGFyZSB0aGUga25vd24gaXNzdWVz LCBwcm9ibGVtcywgaW5hY2N1cmFjaWVzLCBjb21tb24gbWlzdGFrZXMsIGFuZCB0aGluZ3MgdG8g YXZvaWQgd2hlbiBidWlsZGluZyB0aGlzIGtpdD8KMikgV2hhdCBhcmUgdGhlIChtZWNoYW5pY2Fs LCBhZXJvZHluYW1pYywgc3RydWN0dXJhbCkgdXBncmFkZXMsIHR3ZWFrcywgaGFja3MsIGFuZCBt b2RpZmljYXRpb25zIGlmIGFueSB0aGF0IGFyZSBrbm93biB0byBiZSB3b3J0aHdoaWxlIGFuZCBk ZXNpcmFibGUgdG8gaGF2ZT8KMykgV2hhdCBhcmUgdGhlIHVwZ3JhZGVzLCB0d2Vha3MsIG1vZGlm aWNhdGlvbnMgYW5kICJpbXByb3ZlbWVudHMiIHRoYXQgcGVvcGxlIGhhdmUgdHJpZWQgd2hpY2gg ZGlkIG5vdCB3b3JrLCBjYXVzZWQgcHJvYmxlbXMsIG9yIHdhc3RlZCB0aW1lPwoKQWJvdXQgbWU6 CgpBZ2U6IE9sZCBlbm91Z2ggdG8ga25vdyB0aGF0IFRoZSBSaWRkbGVyIGlzIEZyYW5rIEdvcnNo aW4gYW5kIG5vdCBKaW0gQ2FycmV5IDopClBpbG90OiBhcHByb3ggMTgwMCBob3VycyBUVCwgRmly c3QgU29sbyAxOTc3LCBwcml2YXRlIHBpbG90IHJhdGluZywgYWlycGxhbmUgYW5kIGdsaWRlcgpP d25lZCBBaXJjcmFmdDogUlYtMywgVGF5bG9yY3JhZnQgKDQpLCBKLTMsIENlc3NuYSAxNzIgInN0 cmFpZ2h0IHRhaWwiIChjdXJyZW50KSwgQ2Fzc3V0dCBGLTEgUmFjZXIgKFJhY2UgIzgxLCBSZW5v IDE5ODgtODkpCk93bmVkIFNhaWxwbGFuZXM6IE1pbmktTmltYnVzLCBBUy1XMjAsIEFTLVcyMEJM LCBWZW50dXMgQi0xNi42IChjb250ZXN0ICMgVkIsIDE5ODEtODcsIDIgRkFJIHNwZWVkIHJlY29y ZHMsIDE5ODQpCkdyYWR1YXRlZCBBJlAgTWVjaGFuaWMgY29sbGVnZSBwcm9ncmFtIDE5ODMgKHN0 aWxsIGhhdmVuJ3QgdGFrZW4gdGhlIEZBQSB0ZXN0KQpIb2xkZXIgb2YgRkFBIFNUQy1QTUEgbWFu dWZhY3R1cmluZyBhcHByb3ZhbCBmb3IgYSBzYWZldHkvcGVyZm9ybWFuY2UgdXBncmFkZSBwcm9k dWN0IG9uIG51bWVyb3VzIGNlcnRpZmllZCBhaXJjcmFmdAoKSW50ZXJlc3QgaW4gS29sYjoKTXkg aW50ZXJlc3QgaW4gdGhlIEtvbGIgaGFzIGhhcHBlbmVkIG9ubHkgcmVjZW50bHkuIFdoZW4gSSBm aXJzdCBzYXcgdGhlbSB3YXkgYmFjayB3aGVuLCBJIGRpc2xpa2VkIHRoZSBsb29rcyBvZiB0aGUg ZGVzaWduIGNvbXBhcmVkIHRvIHRyYWRpdGlvbmFsIGFpcmNyYWZ0LiBUaGUgZmxhdCBib3R0b20g YWlyZm9pbCAoYWxsIHRvbyBzaW1pbGFyIHRvIG15IG9sZCBFYWdsZSA2MyBSL0MgbW9kZWxzKSwg YW5kIHRoZSBoYXJzaCBhbmd1bGFyIHNoYXBlIG9mIHRoZSBmdXNlbGFnZSBsaW5lcywgZGlkbid0 IGFncmVlIHdpdGggbWUuIE92ZXIgdGltZSBhbmQgd2l0aCBhIGxvdCBvZiB3YXRlciB1bmRlciB0 aGUgYnJpZGdlLCBteSBmbHlpbmcgZGVzaXJlcyBhbmQgcmVhbGlzdGljIG5lZWRzIGNoYW5nZWQu IEkgdG9vayBhIHNlY29uZCBsb29rIGF0IHRoZSBLb2xiIHdpdGggYSBmcmVzaCBzZXQgb2YgZXll cyBhbmQgYW4gb3BlbiBtaW5kLCBhbmQgSSBmaW5hbGx5IHJlYWxpemVkIHRoZSBicmlsbGlhbmNl IGJlaGluZCBtYW55IG9mIHRoZSBLb2xiJ3MgZmVhdHVyZXMuIE15IGRlc2lyZSB0byBoYXZlIGEg bG93IGFuZCBzbG93IGFpcnBsYW5lIGhhZCB0byBhbHNvIGFkZHJlc3MgdGhlIGZhY3QgdGhhdCBp dCBoYWQgdG8gZml0IGluIGEgVC1oYW5nYXIgYWxvbmcgd2l0aCB0aGUgbGFyZ2VyIDE3Mi4gU28g dGhlIEtvbGIgZm9sZGluZyB3aW5ncyBpcyBhIG1ha2Utb3ItYnJlYWsgaXRlbS4gVGhlIHBsYWNl bWVudCBvZiB0aGUgdHViZSBzcGFyIGluIHRoZSB3aW5nLCBiZWhpbmQgdGhlIG1heC4gdGhpY2tu ZXNzIHBvaW50LCBoYWQgaW5pdGlhbGx5IGFubm95ZWQgbWUgYWxsIHRvIGhlbGwsIHVudGlsIEkg bGVhcm5lZCBmcm9tIGEgc2VuaW9yIGxldmVsIGVuZ2luZWVyIHRoYXQgdGhpcyB1bnVzdWFsIHBs YWNlbWVudCBiYWxhbmNlZCBvdXQgdGhlIGZvcmNlcyBiZXR3ZWVuIHRoZSB0b3JzaW9uL3R3aXN0 aW5nIG1vbWVudCBvZiB0aGUhCiAgd2luZyBhbmQgdGhlIGxpZnRpbmcgbW9tZW50LiAKCkFueXdh eSwgSSBhbSB2ZXJ5IHRoYW5rZnVsIGZvciBhbnN3ZXJzIGFuZCBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBmcm9tIHRo ZSBtZW1iZXJzIG9mIHRoaXMgbWFpbCBsaXN0LiBJJ2xsIGJlIGdsYWQgdG8gcHJvdmlkZSBtb3Jl IGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIGFib3V0IHdoYXQgSSB3aWxsIGJlIHVzaW5nIHRoZSBGaXJlc3RhciBmb3Ig YW5kIHdoeS93aGVyZSBJIHdpbGwgYmUgZmx5aW5nIGl0IGlmIGFueW9uZSBpcyBpbnRlcmVzdGVk LgoKQmlsbCBCZXJsZSAgV2hpdGVtYW4gQWlycG9ydCwgTG9zIEFuZ2xlcywgQ0EKCgpfLT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQpf LT0KXy09ICAgICAgIC0tIFBsZWFzZSBTdXBwb3J0IFlvdXIgTGlzdHMgVGhpcyBNb250aCAtLQpf LT0gICAgICAgICAgIChBbmQgR2V0IFNvbWUgQVdFU09NRSBGUkVFIEdpZnRzISkKXy09Cl8tPSAg IE5vdmVtYmVyIGlzIHRoZSBBbm51YWwgTGlzdCBGdW5kIFJhaXNlci4gIENsaWNrIG9uCl8tPSAg IHRoZSBDb250cmlidXRpb24gbGluayBiZWxvdyB0byBmaW5kIG91dCBtb3JlIGFib3V0Cl8tPSAg IHRoaXMgeWVhcidzIFRlcnJpZmljIEZyZWUgSW5jZW50aXZlIEdpZnRzIHByb3ZpZGVkCl8tPSAg IGJ5OgpfLT0gICAKXy09ICAgICAqIFRoZSBCdWlsZGVyJ3MgQm9va3N0b3JlIHd3dy5idWlsZGVy c2Jvb2tzLmNvbQpfLT0KXy09ICAgTGlzdCBDb250cmlidXRpb24gV2ViIFNpdGU6Cl8tPQpfLT0g ICAtLT4gaHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL2NvbnRyaWJ1dGlvbgpfLT0KXy09ICAgVGhh bmsgeW91IGZvciB5b3VyIGdlbmVyb3VzIHN1cHBvcnQhCl8tPQpfLT0gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAtTWF0dCBEcmFsbGUsIExpc3QgQWRtaW4uCl8tPQpfLT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQpfLT0gICAg ICAgICAgLSBUaGUgS29sYi1MaXN0IEVtYWlsIEZvcnVtIC0KXy09IFVzZSB0aGUgTWF0cm9uaWNz IExpc3QgRmVhdHVyZXMgTmF2aWdhdG9yIHRvIGJyb3dzZQpfLT0gdGhlIG1hbnkgTGlzdCB1dGls aXRpZXMgc3VjaCBhcyBMaXN0IFVuL1N1YnNjcmlwdGlvbiwKXy09IEFyY2hpdmUgU2VhcmNoICYg RG93bmxvYWQsIDctRGF5IEJyb3dzZSwgQ2hhdCwgRkFRLApfLT0gUGhvdG9zaGFyZSwgYW5kIG11 Y2ggbXVjaCBtb3JlOgpfLT0KXy09ICAgLS0+IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9OYXZp Z2F0b3I/S29sYi1MaXN0Cl8tPQpfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQpfLT0gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAtIE1BVFJPTklDUyBX RUIgRk9SVU1TIC0KXy09IFNhbWUgZ3JlYXQgY29udGVudCBhbHNvIGF2YWlsYWJsZSB2aWEgdGhl IFdlYiBGb3J1bXMhCl8tPQpfLT0gICAtLT4gaHR0cDovL2ZvcnVtcy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tCl8t PQpfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PQpfLT0gICAgICAgICAgICAgLSBMaXN0IENvbnRyaWJ1dGlvbiBXZWIgU2l0ZSAtCl8t PSAgVGhhbmsgeW91IGZvciB5b3VyIGdlbmVyb3VzIHN1cHBvcnQhCl8tPSAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIC1NYXR0IERyYWxsZSwgTGlzdCBBZG1pbi4KXy09ICAgLS0+IGh0dHA6 Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9jb250cmlidXRpb24KXy09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0KCgoKCg= ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <wrice(at)omnicityusa.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb
Date: Feb 17, 2016
I have a MarkIII that needs flown, I dont have my Sport Pilots Cert. and just dont feel its correct to fly without it. the plane was built in 1992, and took Grand Champion at Oshkosh that year. I am the 3rd owner and the total hours are approx. 135 on airframe and the Rotax 503, duel carb, duel ignition. GSC three blade prop w/al. spinner. Wheel Pants. Always hangered. $13000. If interested, 260 758 3391, 25 mi. S. of Fort Wayne, In. P.S. I wont be able to be reached at this no. until Tuesday 23 Feb 2016. Bill ----Original Message----- From: Larry Lukehart Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 9:13 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb Good Morning Dave, Thanks for the early on "heads up" response but I am only interested in a single place and not wanting to spend that much for one,,, I have no doubt your Mark III is beautiful but it's more than I'm looking for,,, Thanks again Larry L. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Watkinsdw" <david.watkins0(at)gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 6:43 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb > > Hi, Luke, > I have a beautiful MkIII Classic with a 100 hp. Rotax 912 for sale. I'm > about to post it on Barnstormers for a reduced price of $19,900. If you'd > like to see a video of the walk-around inspection, click on this link: > http://youtu.be/dwpU42ViVDA > Dave Watkins > Pompano Beach, FL > 954-608-5423 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452918#452918 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb
Date: Feb 17, 2016
Who built this 1992 MKIII? Do you have a serial number for it? I was at Oshkosh that year, but cannot remember who had the 1992 Grand Champion Light Plane. OK. I remember the 503 on a MKIII. It was a red and white color scheme. The aircraft had not been flown, nor the initial flight test hours flown off it. It certainly wasn't flown to Oshkosh, and was not qualified to be judged at Oshkosh, but somehow it was. I may be wrong on this aircraft. Please let me know. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of wrice(at)omnicityusa.com Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb I have a MarkIII that needs flown, I dont have my Sport Pilots Cert. and just dont feel its correct to fly without it. the plane was built in 1992, and took Grand Champion at Oshkosh that year. I am the 3rd owner and the total hours are approx. 135 on airframe and the Rotax 503, duel carb, duel ignition. GSC three blade prop w/al. spinner. Wheel Pants. Always hangered. $13000. If interested, 260 758 3391, 25 mi. S. of Fort Wayne, In. P.S. I wont be able to be reached at this no. until Tuesday 23 Feb 2016. Bill ----Original Message----- From: Larry Lukehart Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 9:13 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb Good Morning Dave, Thanks for the early on "heads up" response but I am only interested in a single place and not wanting to spend that much for one,,, I have no doubt your Mark III is beautiful but it's more than I'm looking for,,, Thanks again Larry L. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Watkinsdw" <david.watkins0(at)gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 6:43 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb > > Hi, Luke, > I have a beautiful MkIII Classic with a 100 hp. Rotax 912 for sale. I'm > about to post it on Barnstormers for a reduced price of $19,900. If you'd > like to see a video of the walk-around inspection, click on this link: > http://youtu.be/dwpU42ViVDA > Dave Watkins > Pompano Beach, FL > 954-608-5423 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452918#452918 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb
Date: Feb 17, 2016
Second thoughts. The aircraft I describe may have been 1994. I know the 1993 Grand Champ Lt Plane. No important. Just making my brain itch a bit. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Hauck Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 7:50 PM Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb Who built this 1992 MKIII? Do you have a serial number for it? I was at Oshkosh that year, but cannot remember who had the 1992 Grand Champion Light Plane. OK. I remember the 503 on a MKIII. It was a red and white color scheme. The aircraft had not been flown, nor the initial flight test hours flown off it. It certainly wasn't flown to Oshkosh, and was not qualified to be judged at Oshkosh, but somehow it was. I may be wrong on this aircraft. Please let me know. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of wrice(at)omnicityusa.com Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb I have a MarkIII that needs flown, I dont have my Sport Pilots Cert. and just dont feel its correct to fly without it. the plane was built in 1992, and took Grand Champion at Oshkosh that year. I am the 3rd owner and the total hours are approx. 135 on airframe and the Rotax 503, duel carb, duel ignition. GSC three blade prop w/al. spinner. Wheel Pants. Always hangered. $13000. If interested, 260 758 3391, 25 mi. S. of Fort Wayne, In. P.S. I wont be able to be reached at this no. until Tuesday 23 Feb 2016. Bill ----Original Message----- From: Larry Lukehart Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 9:13 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb Good Morning Dave, Thanks for the early on "heads up" response but I am only interested in a single place and not wanting to spend that much for one,,, I have no doubt your Mark III is beautiful but it's more than I'm looking for,,, Thanks again Larry L. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Watkinsdw" <david.watkins0(at)gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 6:43 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb > --> > > Hi, Luke, > I have a beautiful MkIII Classic with a 100 hp. Rotax 912 for sale. > I'm about to post it on Barnstormers for a reduced price of $19,900. > If you'd like to see a video of the walk-around inspection, click on this link: > http://youtu.be/dwpU42ViVDA > Dave Watkins > Pompano Beach, FL > 954-608-5423 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452918#452918 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Kolb
From: kinne russ <russk50(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 17, 2016
John - your memory is impressive! > On Feb 17, 2016, at 9:02 PM, John Hauck wrote: > > > Second thoughts. The aircraft I describe may have been 1994. I know the 1993 Grand Champ Lt Plane. > > No important. Just making my brain itch a bit. > > john h > mkIII > Titus, Alabama > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Hauck > Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 7:50 PM > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb > > > Who built this 1992 MKIII? Do you have a serial number for it? > > I was at Oshkosh that year, but cannot remember who had the 1992 Grand Champion Light Plane. > > OK. I remember the 503 on a MKIII. It was a red and white color scheme. The aircraft had not been flown, nor the initial flight test hours flown off it. It certainly wasn't flown to Oshkosh, and was not qualified to be judged at Oshkosh, but somehow it was. I may be wrong on this aircraft. Please let me know. > > john h > mkIII > Titus, Alabama > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of wrice(at)omnicityusa.com > Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 6:17 PM > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb > > > I have a MarkIII that needs flown, I dont have my Sport Pilots Cert. and just dont feel its correct to fly without it. the plane was built in 1992, and took Grand Champion at Oshkosh that year. I am the 3rd owner and the total hours are approx. 135 on airframe and the Rotax 503, duel carb, duel ignition. GSC three blade prop w/al. spinner. Wheel Pants. Always hangered. $13000. If interested, 260 758 3391, 25 mi. S. of Fort Wayne, In. P.S. I wont be able to be reached at this no. until Tuesday 23 Feb 2016. > Bill > ----Original Message----- > From: Larry Lukehart > Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 9:13 AM > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb > > > > Good Morning Dave, > > Thanks for the early on "heads up" response but I am only interested > > in a single place and not wanting to spend that much for one,,, > > I have no doubt your Mark III is beautiful but it's more than I'm > > looking for,,, > > Thanks again > > Larry L. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Watkinsdw" <david.watkins0(at)gmail.com> > To: > Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 6:43 AM > Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb > > >> --> >> >> Hi, Luke, >> I have a beautiful MkIII Classic with a 100 hp. Rotax 912 for sale. >> I'm about to post it on Barnstormers for a reduced price of $19,900. >> If you'd like to see a video of the walk-around inspection, click on this link: >> http://youtu.be/dwpU42ViVDA >> Dave Watkins >> Pompano Beach, FL >> 954-608-5423 >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452918#452918 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Dee LeBlanc <leblancds(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb
Date: Feb 17, 2016
This one may be of interest to you . . . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLJYjGBLCDI Dee LeBlanc leblancds(at)cox.net cell 225-802-1038 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The Past is History The Future is a Mystery Today is a Gift That=92s Why They Call it the Present > On Feb 16, 2016, at 11:59 AM, Larry Lukehart wrote: > > Can anyone send me the email address of the fella in Hastings Minn. > > that has the Kolb for sale,, > > I'm in the market for purchasing one !! > > I can't open on send on the Matronics list even tho I'm listed as a new > > member,,, don't know why I can't open for posts !! ?? > > Thank You > Larry L. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 17, 2016
Subject: Re: Kolb
From: Rick Neilsen <neilsenrm(at)gmail.com>
Dave's airplane is Steven Green's old airplane. Steve built it. It looks to be well maintained. I spent a lot of time trying unsuccessfully to keep up with this plane on the way to Oshkosh. I was there at a Kolb flyin when Homer Kolb signed this plane. Seems like he said it was his honor to sign it. Very nice airplane. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Watkinsdw wrote: > > Hi, Luke, > I have a beautiful MkIII Classic with a 100 hp. Rotax 912 for sale. I'm > about to post it on Barnstormers for a reduced price of $19,900. If you'd > like to see a video of the walk-around inspection, click on this link: > http://youtu.be/dwpU42ViVDA > Dave Watkins > Pompano Beach, FL > 954-608-5423 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452917#452917 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Newbie Alert, Bought Kit: Take me to school on the Firestar
From: "Richard Pike" <thegreybaron(at)charter.net>
Date: Feb 17, 2016
Figure out if you have the old style thin wall gear leg to axle fittings. If you do, call Kolb and get the new thick wall version. Yeah, they are expensive; buy them anyway. The old thin wall ones will break in a hard landing. Also make sure you do not have the "short" landing gear legs that only go part way up into the socket. A hard landing can kink/damage the socket. A 503 is plenty enough engine, but if you want a 582, be pepared to beef up the upper cage a bit. Instructions in included link. Make sure your instrument panel is easy to remove or slide out to access the back side. John Hauck came up with a mod where you add a brace to the lower vertical fin and from there up to the steel ring just below the elevator inboard hinge point. It is possible to put a large side load on the tailwheel and over time this can fatigue or crack your vertical tailpost below the steel ring. Beefing this up is good, study the included pictures. The MKIII will not fly hands off, but a few degrees of dihedral in a FSII and an adjustable elevator trim system and it will fly hands off very nicely. When you do your fuel plumbing, use only soft aluminum aircraft fuel line, P/N 03-40400 https://www.cps-parts.com/catalog/mepages/3003versatube.php?clickkey=108654 and good quality fuel line from the auto parts store, not any of the clear, or blue, or yellow "ultralight" fuel tubing. More stuff on this link: http://oh2fly.net/oldpoops/kolb.html -------- Richard Pike Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Kingsport, TN 3TN0 Would you consider yourself to be a good person? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWcDXT6pH7A Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452947#452947 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/p1040956_medium_102.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/p1040957_medium_163.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Bradley Nation <nationcap(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Tire Replacement
Date: Feb 17, 2016
Im try to replace my tires on my Xtra but so far I am unable to remove them from the Matco split rims. It seems that the beed sealer is being uncooperative (Im thinking its really epoxy or perhaps someone has found a new method to vulcanize rubber to metal). I havent found any tire shop that will work on that size of wheel. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Brad Nation ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 17, 2016
Subject: Tire Replacement
From: Charlie England <ceengland7(at)gmail.com>
R29sZiBjYXJ0IGRlYWxlcj8gU29tZSB0aXJlIGRpc3RyaWJ1dG9ycyB0aGF0IGhhdmUgYSByZXRh aWwgZGVwdCBtaWdodCBkbyBpdCwgYXMgd2VsbC4gT3IsIGEgc21hbGwgdGlyZSBzaG9wIGluIGEg c21hbGxlciBjb21tdW5pdHkgd2lsbCBvZnRlbiBzZWxsIGF0di91dHYgdGlyZXMuCgo8ZGl2Pi0t LS0tLS0tIE9yaWdpbmFsIG1lc3NhZ2UgLS0tLS0tLS08L2Rpdj48ZGl2PkZyb206IEJyYWRsZXkg TmF0aW9uIDxuYXRpb25jYXBAY29tY2FzdC5uZXQ+IDwvZGl2PjxkaXY+RGF0ZTowMi8xNy8yMDE2 ICAxMTowMSBQTSAgKEdNVC0wNjowMCkgPC9kaXY+PGRpdj5UbzogS29sYi1saXN0IDxrb2xiLWxp c3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbT4gPC9kaXY+PGRpdj5TdWJqZWN0OiBLb2xiLUxpc3Q6IFRpcmUgUmVw bGFjZW1lbnQgPC9kaXY+PGRpdj4KPC9kaXY+LS0+IEtvbGItTGlzdCBtZXNzYWdlIHBvc3RlZCBi eTogQnJhZGxleSBOYXRpb24gPG5hdGlvbmNhcEBjb21jYXN0Lm5ldD4KCknigJltIHRyeSB0byBy ZXBsYWNlIG15IHRpcmVzIG9uIG15IFh0cmEgYnV0IHNvIGZhciBJIGFtIHVuYWJsZSB0byByZW1v dmUgdGhlbSBmcm9tIHRoZSBNYXRjbyBzcGxpdCByaW1zLiAgSXQgc2VlbXMgdGhhdCB0aGUgYmVl ZCBzZWFsZXIgaXMgYmVpbmcgdW5jb29wZXJhdGl2ZSAoSeKAmW0gdGhpbmtpbmcgaXTigJlzIHJl YWxseSBlcG94eSBvciBwZXJoYXBzIHNvbWVvbmUgaGFzIGZvdW5kIGEgbmV3IG1ldGhvZCB0byB2 dWxjYW5pemUgcnViYmVyIHRvIG1ldGFsKS4gSSBoYXZlbuKAmXQgZm91bmQgYW55IHRpcmUgc2hv cCB0aGF0IHdpbGwgd29yayBvbiB0aGF0IHNpemUgb2Ygd2hlZWwuICBBbnkgc3VnZ2VzdGlvbnMg d291bGQgYmUgZ3JlYXRseSBhcHByZWNpYXRlZC4KClRoYW5rcyBpbiBhZHZhbmNlLAoKQnJhZCBO YXRpb24KCgoKXy09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0KXy09Cl8tPSAgICAgICAtLSBQbGVhc2UgU3VwcG9ydCBZb3VyIExpc3Rz IFRoaXMgTW9udGggLS0KXy09ICAgICAgICAgICAoQW5kIEdldCBTb21lIEFXRVNPTUUgRlJFRSBH aWZ0cyEpCl8tPQpfLT0gICBOb3ZlbWJlciBpcyB0aGUgQW5udWFsIExpc3QgRnVuZCBSYWlzZXIu ICBDbGljayBvbgpfLT0gICB0aGUgQ29udHJpYnV0aW9uIGxpbmsgYmVsb3cgdG8gZmluZCBvdXQg bW9yZSBhYm91dApfLT0gICB0aGlzIHllYXIncyBUZXJyaWZpYyBGcmVlIEluY2VudGl2ZSBHaWZ0 cyBwcm92aWRlZApfLT0gICBieToKXy09ICAgCl8tPSAgICAgKiBUaGUgQnVpbGRlcidzIEJvb2tz dG9yZSB3d3cuYnVpbGRlcnNib29rcy5jb20KXy09Cl8tPSAgIExpc3QgQ29udHJpYnV0aW9uIFdl YiBTaXRlOgpfLT0KXy09ICAgLS0+IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9jb250cmlidXRp b24KXy09Cl8tPSAgIFRoYW5rIHlvdSBmb3IgeW91ciBnZW5lcm91cyBzdXBwb3J0IQpfLT0KXy09 ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgLU1hdHQgRHJhbGxlLCBMaXN0IEFkbWluLgpf LT0KXy09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT0KXy09ICAgICAgICAgIC0gVGhlIEtvbGItTGlzdCBFbWFpbCBGb3J1bSAtCl8tPSBV c2UgdGhlIE1hdHJvbmljcyBMaXN0IEZlYXR1cmVzIE5hdmlnYXRvciB0byBicm93c2UKXy09IHRo ZSBtYW55IExpc3QgdXRpbGl0aWVzIHN1Y2ggYXMgTGlzdCBVbi9TdWJzY3JpcHRpb24sCl8tPSBB cmNoaXZlIFNlYXJjaCAmIERvd25sb2FkLCA3LURheSBCcm93c2UsIENoYXQsIEZBUSwKXy09IFBo b3Rvc2hhcmUsIGFuZCBtdWNoIG11Y2ggbW9yZToKXy09Cl8tPSAgIC0tPiBodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1h dHJvbmljcy5jb20vTmF2aWdhdG9yP0tvbGItTGlzdApfLT0KXy09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0KXy09ICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgLSBNQVRST05JQ1MgV0VCIEZPUlVNUyAtCl8tPSBTYW1lIGdyZWF0IGNvbnRlbnQgYWxzbyBh dmFpbGFibGUgdmlhIHRoZSBXZWIgRm9ydW1zIQpfLT0KXy09ICAgLS0+IGh0dHA6Ly9mb3J1bXMu bWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbQpfLT0KXy09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0KXy09ICAgICAgICAgICAgIC0gTGlzdCBDb250cmlidXRp b24gV2ViIFNpdGUgLQpfLT0gIFRoYW5rIHlvdSBmb3IgeW91ciBnZW5lcm91cyBzdXBwb3J0IQpf LT0gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAtTWF0dCBEcmFsbGUsIExpc3QgQWRtaW4u Cl8tPSAgIC0tPiBodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vY29udHJpYnV0aW9uCl8tPT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09CgoK Cg= ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 18, 2016
From: Malcolm Brubaker <brubakermal(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: ALASK or bust
Alaska=C2- or bust !!=C2- we a\have booked our plane tickets to anchora ge=C2- may 27 till june 17th and are renting a car for the trip=C2-=C2 - now we are looking for lodging and day trips for that time frame and al ready have 2 places to stay . anyone=C2- with a=C2-good lead on accommo dations=C2- could plase let me know =C2-=C2-=C2-Malcolm & Jeanne Br ubaker Michigan Sport Pilot Repair http://michigansportpilotrepair.comLSRM-A, PPC, WS Great Sails - Sailmaker for Ultralight & Light Sport (989)513-3022=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- From: John Hauck <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com> To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 9:02 PM Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb Second thoughts.=C2- The aircraft I describe may have been 1994.=C2- I know the 1993 Grand Champ Lt Plane. No important.=C2- Just making my brain itch a bit. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server@m atronics.com] On Behalf Of John Hauck Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 7:50 PM Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb Who built this 1992 MKIII?=C2- Do you have a serial number for it? I was at Oshkosh that year, but cannot remember who had the 1992 Grand Cham pion Light Plane. OK.=C2- I remember the 503 on a MKIII.=C2- It was a red and white color scheme.=C2- The aircraft had not been flown, nor the initial flight test hours flown off it.=C2- It certainly wasn't flown to Oshkosh, and was no t qualified to be judged at Oshkosh, but somehow it was.=C2- I may be wro ng on this aircraft.=C2- Please let me know. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server@m atronics.com] On Behalf Of wrice(at)omnicityusa.com Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb I have a MarkIII that needs flown, I don=99t have my Sport Pilots Cer t. and just don=99t feel its correct to fly without it.=C2- the pla ne was built in 1992, and took Grand Champion at Oshkosh that year.=C2- I am the 3rd owner and the total hours are approx. 135 on airframe and the R otax 503, duel carb, duel ignition.=C2- GSC three blade prop w/al. spinne r.=C2- Wheel Pants.=C2- Always hangered.=C2- $13000.=C2- If interes ted, 260 758 3391, 25 mi. S. of Fort Wayne, In. P.S. I wont be able to be r eached at this no. until Tuesday 23 Feb 2016. Bill =C2- =C2- ----Original Message----- From: Larry Lukehart Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 9:13 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb Good Morning Dave, Thanks for the early on "heads up" response but I am only interested in a single place and not wanting to spend that much for one,,, I have no doubt your Mark III is beautiful but it's more than I'm looking for,,, Thanks again Larry L. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Watkinsdw" <david.watkins0(at)gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 6:43 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb > --> > > Hi, Luke, > I have a beautiful MkIII Classic with a 100 hp. Rotax 912 for sale. > I'm about to post it on Barnstormers for a reduced price of $19,900. > If you'd like to see a video of the walk-around inspection, click on this link: > http://youtu.be/dwpU42ViVDA > Dave Watkins > Pompano Beach, FL > 954-608-5423 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452918#452918 > > =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- -Matt Dralle, List Admin. S - - =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- -Matt Dralle, List Admin. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 18, 2016
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Tire Replacement
Try a fork lift dealer. They work on small diameter stuff. Maybe somebody used a petroleum based product to put them on. Raises hell trying to get them off. Petroleum will dissolve rubber. -------------------------------------------- On Thu, 2/18/16, Bradley Nation wrote: Subject: Kolb-List: Tire Replacement To: "Kolb-list" Date: Thursday, February 18, 2016, 12:01 AM Bradley Nation Im try to replace my tires on my Xtra but so far I am unable to remove them from the Matco split rims. It seems that the beed sealer is being uncooperative (Im thinking its really epoxy or perhaps someone has found a new method to vulcanize rubber to metal). I havent found any tire shop that will work on that size of wheel. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Brad Nation Lists This Month -- Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!) Raiser. Click on more about Gifts provided www.buildersbooks.com -Matt Dralle, List Admin. Forum - - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - List Contribution Web Site - -Matt Dralle, List Admin. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Tire Replacement
From: Herb <Herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Date: Feb 18, 2016
I break tires loose by laying a board on the tire next to the rim and running a wheel of an auto on the board.. Herb On 02/18/2016 07:08 AM, william sullivan wrote: > > Try a fork lift dealer. They work on small diameter stuff. Maybe somebody used a petroleum based product to put them on. Raises hell trying to get them off. Petroleum will dissolve rubber. > > > -------------------------------------------- > On Thu, 2/18/16, Bradley Nation wrote: > > Subject: Kolb-List: Tire Replacement > To: "Kolb-list" > Date: Thursday, February 18, 2016, 12:01 AM > > Bradley Nation > > Im try to replace my tires on my Xtra but so far I am > unable to remove them from the Matco split rims. It > seems that the beed sealer is being uncooperative (Im > thinking its really epoxy or perhaps someone has found a > new method to vulcanize rubber to metal). I havent found > any tire shop that will work on that size of wheel. > Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks in advance, > > Brad Nation > > > > Lists This Month -- > Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!) > Raiser. Click on > more about > Gifts provided > www.buildersbooks.com > -Matt > Dralle, List Admin. > Forum - > - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - > List Contribution Web Site - > -Matt > Dralle, List Admin. > > > > > -- Signature text; Fort Marcy Park? Sure...Mr. Foster...Third red light and turn left. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Tire Replacement
Date: Feb 18, 2016
Never used tire sealer on wheels, but had a couple Armstrong tires that refused to release from the beads on either the FS or MKIII wheels. The tire beads were tougher than the light aluminum wheels. Eventually used a die grinder and cut off wheel to cut the wire bead so I could cut them off. Don't know anything about golf carts. Do they use a one piece or a split rim? I have ATV and SXS one piece wheels and tires mounted and dismounted at regular tire shops, but they would not touch one of these aluminum split rims. A small "shade tree" shop somewhere might tackle the job. I had a flat tire when I landed at Fort Nelson, British Columbia, in 2004. A motorcycle gang was using a hanger to build bikes. They tackled the job for me, took me all the way to town to get some patches. Could have never gotten the job done by myself. I think aircraft tires come off much easier than the golf cart type tires. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bradley Nation Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 11:02 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Tire Replacement Im try to replace my tires on my Xtra but so far I am unable to remove them from the Matco split rims. It seems that the beed sealer is being uncooperative (Im thinking its really epoxy or perhaps someone has found a new method to vulcanize rubber to metal). I havent found any tire shop that will work on that size of wheel. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Brad Nation ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: ALASK or bust
Date: Feb 18, 2016
You aren't flying a Kolb? Try this one: http://alaska.gov/visitorhome.html Be careful in Anchorage and Fairbanks. Easy to get mugged. Pan Handlers everywhere. Much safer out in the bush with the beasts and bears, but you need a Kolb to get there. Tough keeping this one Kolb related. ;-) john h mkIII Titus, Alabama From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Malcolm Brubaker Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 6:36 AM Subject: Kolb-List: ALASK or bust Alaska or bust !! we a\have booked our plane tickets to anchorage may 27 till june 17th and are renting a car for the trip now we are looking for lodging and day trips for that time frame and already have 2 places to stay . anyone with a good lead on accommodations could plase let me know Malcolm & Jeanne Brubaker Michigan Sport Pilot Repair <http://michigansportpilotrepair.com/> http://michigansportpilotrepair.com LSRM-A, PPC, WS Great Sails - Sailmaker for Ultralight & Light Sport (989)513-3022 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Tire Replacement
From: Charlie England <ceengland7(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 18, 2016
Golf cart wheels are one piece; similar in concept to automotive wheels. The reason I mentioned them is that they will have a bead breaker usable on small diameter wheels. Leave the wheel assembled, & let them break the bead on both sides. I'd assume that once the bead is broken free, he can handle the rest of the job himself. On 2/18/2016 8:28 AM, John Hauck wrote: > > Never used tire sealer on wheels, but had a couple Armstrong tires that refused to release from the beads on either the FS or MKIII wheels. The tire beads were tougher than the light aluminum wheels. > > Eventually used a die grinder and cut off wheel to cut the wire bead so I could cut them off. > > Don't know anything about golf carts. Do they use a one piece or a split rim? I have ATV and SXS one piece wheels and tires mounted and dismounted at regular tire shops, but they would not touch one of these aluminum split rims. A small "shade tree" shop somewhere might tackle the job. > > I had a flat tire when I landed at Fort Nelson, British Columbia, in 2004. A motorcycle gang was using a hanger to build bikes. They tackled the job for me, took me all the way to town to get some patches. Could have never gotten the job done by myself. > > I think aircraft tires come off much easier than the golf cart type tires. > > john h > mkIII > Titus, Alabama > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bradley Nation > Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 11:02 PM > To: Kolb-list > Subject: Kolb-List: Tire Replacement > > > Im try to replace my tires on my Xtra but so far I am unable to remove them from the Matco split rims. It seems that the beed sealer is being uncooperative (Im thinking its really epoxy or perhaps someone has found a new method to vulcanize rubber to metal). I havent found any tire shop that will work on that size of wheel. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks in advance, > > Brad Nation > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Tire Replacement
From: Charlie England <ceengland7(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 18, 2016
I like it. :-) I'll file that one away in my (computer) memory banks for future use. On 2/18/2016 8:19 AM, Herb wrote: > > I break tires loose by laying a board on the tire next to the rim and > running a wheel of an auto on the board.. Herb > > On 02/18/2016 07:08 AM, william sullivan wrote: >> >> >> Try a fork lift dealer. They work on small diameter stuff. Maybe >> somebody used a petroleum based product to put them on. Raises hell >> trying to get them off. Petroleum will dissolve rubber. >> >> >> -------------------------------------------- >> On Thu, 2/18/16, Bradley Nation wrote: >> >> Subject: Kolb-List: Tire Replacement >> To: "Kolb-list" >> Date: Thursday, February 18, 2016, 12:01 AM >> Bradley Nation >> Im try to replace my tires on my Xtra but so far I am >> unable to remove them from the Matco split rims. It >> seems that the beed sealer is being uncooperative (Im >> thinking its really epoxy or perhaps someone has found a >> new method to vulcanize rubber to metal). I havent found >> any tire shop that will work on that size of wheel. >> Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. >> Thanks in advance, >> Brad Nation >> Lists This Month -- >> Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!) >> Raiser. Click on >> more about >> Gifts provided >> www.buildersbooks.com >> -Matt >> Dralle, List Admin. >> Forum - >> - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - >> List Contribution Web Site - >> -Matt >> Dralle, List Admin. >> >> >> >> >> > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Tire Replacement
Date: Feb 18, 2016
Problem with breaking tough beads on UL type aluminum wheels is the tire bead is tougher than the aluminum wheel. Very easy to ruin a wheel in the process. The reason I cut the bead with a die grinder was to sacrifice the "off road" tire before I sacrificed the wheel. I'd have second thoughts about butchering an aircraft tire. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Charlie England Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 9:43 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Tire Replacement I like it. :-) I'll file that one away in my (computer) memory banks for future use. On 2/18/2016 8:19 AM, Herb wrote: > > I break tires loose by laying a board on the tire next to the rim and > running a wheel of an auto on the board.. Herb > > On 02/18/2016 07:08 AM, william sullivan wrote: >> >> >> Try a fork lift dealer. They work on small diameter stuff. Maybe >> somebody used a petroleum based product to put them on. Raises hell >> trying to get them off. Petroleum will dissolve rubber. >> >> >> -------------------------------------------- >> On Thu, 2/18/16, Bradley Nation wrote: >> >> Subject: Kolb-List: Tire Replacement >> To: "Kolb-list" >> Date: Thursday, February 18, 2016, 12:01 AM >> Bradley Nation >> Im try to replace my tires on my Xtra but so far I am >> unable to remove them from the Matco split rims. It >> seems that the beed sealer is being uncooperative (Im >> thinking its really epoxy or perhaps someone has found a >> new method to vulcanize rubber to metal). I havent found >> any tire shop that will work on that size of wheel. >> Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. >> Thanks in advance, >> Brad Nation >> Lists This Month -- >> Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!) >> Raiser. Click on >> more about >> Gifts provided >> www.buildersbooks.com >> -Matt >> Dralle, List Admin. >> Forum - >> - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - >> List Contribution Web Site - >> -Matt >> Dralle, List Admin. >> >> >> >> >> > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pcking" <pc.king(at)comcast.net>
Subject: changing tires
Date: Feb 18, 2016
Have you thought of using a mini tire change from Harbor Freight? $42.99. http://www.harborfreight.com/mini-tire-changer-61179.html ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 18, 2016
From: nationcap(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: changing tires
No I did not know about this. I will give it a try. ----- Original Message ----- From: "pcking" <pc.king(at)comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 1:36:11 PM Subject: Kolb-List: changing tires Have you thought of using a mini tire change from Harbor Freight? $42.99. http://www.harborfreight.com/mini-tire-changer-61179.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: changing tires
Date: Feb 18, 2016
Usually, the problem when attempting to break he bead, is that the rim is weaker than the tire bead. If it was my problem and I had a off road tire on the rim, I'd sacrifice the tire and cut the wire bead. If not, I'd figure out which cost the most to replace, aircraft tire or MATCO rim. Good luck with your tire operation. john h Titus, Alabama From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of nationcap(at)comcast.net Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 3:35 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: changing tires No I did not know about this. I will give it a try. _____ From: "pcking" <pc.king(at)comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 1:36:11 PM Subject: Kolb-List: changing tires Have you thought of using a mini tire change from Harbor Freight? $42.99. http://www.harborfreight.com/mini-tire-changer-61179.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <wrice(at)omnicityusa.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb
Date: Feb 18, 2016
Mr. Hauck, maybe I can shed more light on the MIII! If you are like me and scratch your head any more, we wont need a comb. The Builder was Daniel Bauman, serial No. 16 and registration no N726DB. -----Original Message----- From: John Hauck Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 8:49 PM Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb Who built this 1992 MKIII? Do you have a serial number for it? I was at Oshkosh that year, but cannot remember who had the 1992 Grand Champion Light Plane. OK. I remember the 503 on a MKIII. It was a red and white color scheme. The aircraft had not been flown, nor the initial flight test hours flown off it. It certainly wasn't flown to Oshkosh, and was not qualified to be judged at Oshkosh, but somehow it was. I may be wrong on this aircraft. Please let me know. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of wrice(at)omnicityusa.com Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb I have a MarkIII that needs flown, I dont have my Sport Pilots Cert. and just dont feel its correct to fly without it. the plane was built in 1992, and took Grand Champion at Oshkosh that year. I am the 3rd owner and the total hours are approx. 135 on airframe and the Rotax 503, duel carb, duel ignition. GSC three blade prop w/al. spinner. Wheel Pants. Always hangered. $13000. If interested, 260 758 3391, 25 mi. S. of Fort Wayne, In. P.S. I wont be able to be reached at this no. until Tuesday 23 Feb 2016. Bill ----Original Message----- From: Larry Lukehart Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 9:13 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb Good Morning Dave, Thanks for the early on "heads up" response but I am only interested in a single place and not wanting to spend that much for one,,, I have no doubt your Mark III is beautiful but it's more than I'm looking for,,, Thanks again Larry L. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Watkinsdw" <david.watkins0(at)gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 6:43 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb > > Hi, Luke, > I have a beautiful MkIII Classic with a 100 hp. Rotax 912 for sale. I'm > about to post it on Barnstormers for a reduced price of $19,900. If you'd > like to see a video of the walk-around inspection, click on this link: > http://youtu.be/dwpU42ViVDA > Dave Watkins > Pompano Beach, FL > 954-608-5423 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452918#452918 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb
Date: Feb 18, 2016
Yep, that is the one. Was a nice looking MKIII. Must still be like brand new with so few hours on it. Mine shows a lot of fair wear and tear, but still flies well. In fact, I have gotten off my butt and hit the air ways this past Saturday. Got 1.5 hours of really fun flying although the wind was blowing, I still managed to make it home without bending anything. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of wrice(at)omnicityusa.com Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 7:16 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb Mr. Hauck, maybe I can shed more light on the MIII! If you are like me and scratch your head any more, we wont need a comb. The Builder was Daniel Bauman, serial No. 16 and registration no N726DB. -----Original Message----- From: John Hauck Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 8:49 PM Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb Who built this 1992 MKIII? Do you have a serial number for it? I was at Oshkosh that year, but cannot remember who had the 1992 Grand Champion Light Plane. OK. I remember the 503 on a MKIII. It was a red and white color scheme. The aircraft had not been flown, nor the initial flight test hours flown off it. It certainly wasn't flown to Oshkosh, and was not qualified to be judged at Oshkosh, but somehow it was. I may be wrong on this aircraft. Please let me know. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of wrice(at)omnicityusa.com Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb I have a MarkIII that needs flown, I dont have my Sport Pilots Cert. and just dont feel its correct to fly without it. the plane was built in 1992, and took Grand Champion at Oshkosh that year. I am the 3rd owner and the total hours are approx. 135 on airframe and the Rotax 503, duel carb, duel ignition. GSC three blade prop w/al. spinner. Wheel Pants. Always hangered. $13000. If interested, 260 758 3391, 25 mi. S. of Fort Wayne, In. P.S. I wont be able to be reached at this no. until Tuesday 23 Feb 2016. Bill ----Original Message----- From: Larry Lukehart Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 9:13 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb Good Morning Dave, Thanks for the early on "heads up" response but I am only interested in a single place and not wanting to spend that much for one,,, I have no doubt your Mark III is beautiful but it's more than I'm looking for,,, Thanks again Larry L. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Watkinsdw" <david.watkins0(at)gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 6:43 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb > --> > > Hi, Luke, > I have a beautiful MkIII Classic with a 100 hp. Rotax 912 for sale. > I'm about to post it on Barnstormers for a reduced price of $19,900. > If you'd like to see a video of the walk-around inspection, click on this link: > http://youtu.be/dwpU42ViVDA > Dave Watkins > Pompano Beach, FL > 954-608-5423 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452918#452918 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 19, 2016
From: Bill Berle <victorbravo(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Flaperons on the Slingshot
I was looking through pictures today, and I noticed photos showing a "flap" handle in a Slingshot. But looking at the exterios photos I saw that there was only one control surface behind each wing. This would mean that the Slingshot, or at least this one, had a flaperon control mixer. Was this a standard control setup for the Slingshot, or was this one airplane modified with flaperons? Does anyone have and information about this system, and how it operates? Does anyone knoow whether the flaperons were beneficial and how much they halped on the fast or slow end of the speed range? Bill Berle www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and for-profit entities -------------------------------------------- On Thu, 2/18/16, John Hauck wrote: Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Date: Thursday, February 18, 2016, 5:29 PM "John Hauck" Yep, that is the one. Was a nice looking MKIII. Must still be like brand new with so few hours on it. Mine shows a lot of fair wear and tear, but still flies well. In fact, I have gotten off my butt and hit the air ways this past Saturday. Got 1.5 hours of really fun flying although the wind was blowing, I still managed to make it home without bending anything. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of wrice(at)omnicityusa.com Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 7:16 PM To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb Mr. Hauck, maybe I can shed more light on the MIII!If you are like me and scratch your head any more, we wont need a comb. The Builder was Daniel Bauman, serial No. 16 and registration no N726DB. -----Original Message----- From: John Hauck Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 8:49 PM To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb Who built this 1992 MKIII? Do you have a serial number for it? I was at Oshkosh that year, but cannot remember who had the 1992 Grand Champion Light Plane. OK. I remember the 503 on a MKIII. It was a red and white color scheme. The aircraft had not been flown, nor the initial flight test hours flown off it. It certainly wasn't flown to Oshkosh, and was not qualified to be judged at Oshkosh, but somehow it was. I may be wrong on this aircraft. Please let me know. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of wrice(at)omnicityusa.com Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 6:17 PM To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb I have a MarkIII that needs flown, I dont have my Sport Pilots Cert. and just dont feel its correct to fly without it. the plane was built in 1992, and took Grand Champion at Oshkosh that year. I am the 3rd owner and the total hours are approx. 135 on airframe and the Rotax 503, duel carb, duel ignition. GSC three blade prop w/al. spinner. Wheel Pants. Always hangered. $13000. If interested, 260 758 3391, 25 mi. S. of Fort Wayne, In. P.S. I wont be able to be reached at this no. until Tuesday 23 Feb 2016. Bill ----Original Message----- From: Larry Lukehart Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 9:13 AM To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb Good Morning Dave, Thanks for the early on "heads up" response but I am only interested in a single place and not wanting to spend that much for one,,, I have no doubt your Mark III is beautiful but it's more than I'm looking for,,, Thanks again Larry L. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Watkinsdw" <david.watkins0(at)gmail.com> To: Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 6:43 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb > --> > > Hi, Luke, > I have a beautiful MkIII Classic with a 100 hp. Rotax 912 for sale. > I'm about to post it on Barnstormers for a reduced price of $19,900. > If you'd like to see a video of the walk-around inspection, click on this link: > http://youtu.be/dwpU42ViVDA > Dave Watkins > Pompano Beach, FL > 954-608-5423 > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452918#452918 > > > > > > > > > > > Lists This Month -- Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!) Raiser. Click on more about Gifts provided www.buildersbooks.com -Matt Dralle, List Admin. Forum - - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - List Contribution Web Site - -Matt Dralle, List Admin. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 18, 2016
Subject: Re: Tire Replacement
From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com>
-- Seems like only yesterday that some one suggested that I glue my tires on rather than use screws to keep them from slipping at low pressure. I think I will stick with the screws. I don't have a tire changer, but I do have a screw gun. :-) smug Larry ---Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bradley Nation Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 11:02 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Tire Replacement I=99m try to replace my tires on my Xtra but so far I am unable to re move them from the Matco split rims. It seems that the beed sealer is being uncooperative (I=99m thinking it=99s really epoxy or perhaps so meone has found a new method to vulcanize rubber to metal). I haven=99t found any tir e shop that will work on that size of wheel. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Brad Nation On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 7:28 AM, John Hauck wrote: > > Never used tire sealer on wheels, but had a couple Armstrong tires that > refused to release from the beads on either the FS or MKIII wheels. The > tire beads were tougher than the light aluminum wheels. > > Eventually used a die grinder and cut off wheel to cut the wire bead so I > could cut them off. > > Don't know anything about golf carts. Do they use a one piece or a split > rim? I have ATV and SXS one piece wheels and tires mounted and dismounte d > at regular tire shops, but they would not touch one of these aluminum spl it > rims. A small "shade tree" shop somewhere might tackle the job. > > I had a flat tire when I landed at Fort Nelson, British Columbia, in > 2004. A motorcycle gang was using a hanger to build bikes. They tackled > the job for me, took me all the way to town to get some patches. Could > have never gotten the job done by myself. > > I think aircraft tires come off much easier than the golf cart type tires . > > john h > mkIII > Titus, Alabama > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto: > owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bradley Nation > Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 11:02 PM > To: Kolb-list > Subject: Kolb-List: Tire Replacement > > > I=99m try to replace my tires on my Xtra but so far I am unable to remove > them from the Matco split rims. It seems that the beed sealer is being > uncooperative (I=99m thinking it=99s really epoxy or perhaps someone has found > a new method to vulcanize rubber to metal). I haven=99t found any t ire shop > that will work on that size of wheel. Any suggestions would be greatly > appreciated. > > Thanks in advance, > > Brad Nation > > =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== > > -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 18, 2016
Subject: Re: Tire Replacement
From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com>
Is seems like only yesterday that several people were telling me to use bead sealer rather than screws to keep my tires from slipping at low pressure. I think I will stick with the screws. Larry On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Bradley Nation wrote: > > I=99m try to replace my tires on my Xtra but so far I am unable to remove > them from the Matco split rims. It seems that the beed sealer is being > uncooperative (I=99m thinking it=99s really epoxy or perhaps someone has found > a new method to vulcanize rubber to metal). I haven=99t found any t ire shop > that will work on that size of wheel. Any suggestions would be greatly > appreciated. > > Thanks in advance, > > Brad Nation > > =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== > > -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Tire Replacement
From: "Watkinsdw" <david.watkins0(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 19, 2016
I bought this mini tire changer six years ago at Northern Tool. It has worked well for me. They no longer carry it, but Harbor Freight is advertising it. Hope that helps! Dave Watkins MkIII Classic Pompano Beach, FL (KPMP) Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452995#452995 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/image_547.png ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Tire Replacement
From: "Watkinsdw" <david.watkins0(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 19, 2016
Wow! That turned out way bigger than I intended! Sorry! Dave Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452996#452996 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 19, 2016
Subject: Re: Tire Replacement
From: Rick Neilsen <neilsenrm(at)gmail.com>
I have struggled in the past to break the bead on my Matco wheels. Created a few tools with limited success. The last time I needed to change a tube was at Airventure. Landed on the grass on the UL strip with a totally flat tire, no brakes needed. Taxi speed was slow and lumby. John Williamson followed my in, grumbled later he almost landed on top of me. Took the wheel/tire to the EAA repair shop with a newly purchased tube. I used their small wheel bead breaker. The bead separated very easy with no deformation of the wheel. The tire changer that has been indicated looks like it could stress the wheel when trying to break the bead. Once these tires seat they really bond themselves to the wheel. HF also sells a small wheel bead breaker that I have been telling myself I will buy next time I change my tires. Getting close little/no tread left. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Watkinsdw wrote: > > I bought this mini tire changer six years ago at Northern Tool. It has > worked well for me. They no longer carry it, but Harbor Freight is > advertising it. > Hope that helps! > Dave Watkins > MkIII Classic > Pompano Beach, FL (KPMP) > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=452995#452995 > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/image_547.png > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 19, 2016
From: nationcap(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: Tire Replacement
All I can say is that the tires are not slipping, that's for sure. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 8:52:17 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Tire Replacement Is seems like only yesterday that several people were telling me to use bea d sealer rather than screws to keep my tires from slipping at low pressure. I think I will stick with the screws. Larry On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Bradley Nation < nationcap(at)comcast.net > wrote: I=99m try to replace my tires on my Xtra but so far I am unable to re move them from the Matco split rims. It seems that the beed sealer is being uncooperative (I=99m thinking it=99s really epoxy or perhaps s omeone has found a new method to vulcanize rubber to metal). I haven =99t found any tire shop that will work on that size of wheel. Any suggesti ons would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Brad Nation =========== br> fts!) r> > w.buildersbooks.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.builders books.com rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution -Matt Dralle, List Admin. =========== -List" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Naviga tor?Kolb-List =========== FORUMS - eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com =========== b Site - -Matt Dralle, List Admin. rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution =========== -- The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant. If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email addres s before sending. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Tire Replacement
From: "racerjerry" <gnking2(at)verizon.net>
Date: Feb 20, 2016
A regular tire bead breaker should work. You just need to concentrate the force in one spot using a 2 x 3. Apply and hold force then heat area with a heat gun or hair dryer to soften the glue. Once you get it started, the bead should tear loose easily. I use something like this, together with plywood to protect the wheel on the backside: http://www.harborfreight.com/bead-breaker-92961.html As John H. cautioned, be darned careful not to distort the wheel. If you still have a problem, rig up something to apply concentrated force that you can let sit overnight. Puddle some solvent around the tire bead to help soften the glue -------- Jerry King Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453012#453012 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flaperons on the Slingshot
From: "racerjerry" <gnking2(at)verizon.net>
Date: Feb 20, 2016
>From this video, it appears that most, if not all, Kolb Slingshots incorporate flaperons. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMZ5LJ8IvBc I dunno' about flaperons on a Slingshot, but I modified my clipped wing Firestar II to accommodate flaperons with linkage modeled after the Kolb Firefly. It worked well. The reason I wanted flaperons is that they very much helped me to (almost) meet FAA requirements for an ultralight vehicle; specifically, AC 103-7, appendix 2. I am fairly sure that this is the main reason that flaperons were incorporated into Firefly design. Personally, I found the flaperons to be of little use on an already slow landing draggy airplane; err..., I mean "vehicle". Your mileage may vary. My guess is that flaperons may well benefit the faster Slingshot. In any event, take a close look at the Firefly and its very simple lightweight flaperon mechanism that you may be able to use. Thank you, Homer. -------- Jerry King Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453014#453014 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Flaperons on the Slingshot
Date: Feb 20, 2016
I carried a cameraman and huge video camera on that flight. Not much room in the Slingshot for two folks. He had to put the front of the camera on my right shoulder. The Slingshot performed well with the 65 hp 582. At that time I was still not accustomed to the short, stubby 22' wings. Today you stick a Go Pro on the nose to get video in flight. The flaperons on the FF and SS were not nearly effective as the flaps on the MKIII. This video is the year Kolb introduced the updated MKIIIx with droop wing tips at Sun and Fun. You get a good idea how large the flaps are. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6LjOighew8 john h mkIII Titus, Alabama -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of racerjerry Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2016 8:53 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Flaperons on the Slingshot >From this video, it appears that most, if not all, Kolb Slingshots incorporate flaperons. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMZ5LJ8IvBc I dunno' about flaperons on a Slingshot, but I modified my clipped wing Firestar II to accommodate flaperons with linkage modeled after the Kolb Firefly. It worked well. The reason I wanted flaperons is that they very much helped me to (almost) meet FAA requirements for an ultralight vehicle; specifically, AC 103-7, appendix 2. I am fairly sure that this is the main reason that flaperons were incorporated into Firefly design. Personally, I found the flaperons to be of little use on an already slow landing draggy airplane; err..., I mean "vehicle". Your mileage may vary. My guess is that flaperons may well benefit the faster Slingshot. In any event, take a close look at the Firefly and its very simple lightweight flaperon mechanism that you may be able to use. Thank you, Homer. -------- Jerry King Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453014#453014 = = Photoshare, and much much more: = = = ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Flaperons on the Slingshot
Date: Feb 20, 2016
I might add it didn't take long to get used to those little wings and lift struts which were very capable. Both the SS and the FF are little hot rods. Very quick response and high performance. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Hauck Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2016 9:39 AM Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Re: Flaperons on the Slingshot I carried a cameraman and huge video camera on that flight. Not much room in the Slingshot for two folks. He had to put the front of the camera on my right shoulder. The Slingshot performed well with the 65 hp 582. At that time I was still not accustomed to the short, stubby 22' wings. Today you stick a Go Pro on the nose to get video in flight. The flaperons on the FF and SS were not nearly effective as the flaps on the MKIII. This video is the year Kolb introduced the updated MKIIIx with droop wing tips at Sun and Fun. You get a good idea how large the flaps are. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6LjOighew8 john h mkIII Titus, Alabama -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of racerjerry Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2016 8:53 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Flaperons on the Slingshot >From this video, it appears that most, if not all, Kolb Slingshots incorporate flaperons. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMZ5LJ8IvBc I dunno' about flaperons on a Slingshot, but I modified my clipped wing Firestar II to accommodate flaperons with linkage modeled after the Kolb Firefly. It worked well. The reason I wanted flaperons is that they very much helped me to (almost) meet FAA requirements for an ultralight vehicle; specifically, AC 103-7, appendix 2. I am fairly sure that this is the main reason that flaperons were incorporated into Firefly design. Personally, I found the flaperons to be of little use on an already slow landing draggy airplane; err..., I mean "vehicle". Your mileage may vary. My guess is that flaperons may well benefit the faster Slingshot. In any event, take a close look at the Firefly and its very simple lightweight flaperon mechanism that you may be able to use. Thank you, Homer. -------- Jerry King Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453014#453014 = = Photoshare, and much much more: = = = = = Photoshare, and much much more: = = = ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 20, 2016
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: Tire Replacement
My solution: http://jackbhart.com/firefly/firefly107.html Jack B Hart FF004 Winchester, IN At 09:19 AM 2/18/2016, you wrote: > >I break tires loose by laying a board on the >tire next to the rim and running a wheel of an auto on the board.. Herb > >On 02/18/2016 07:08 AM, william sullivan wrote: >>sullivan >> >> Try a fork lift dealer. They work on small >> diameter stuff. Maybe somebody used a >> petroleum based product to put them >> on. Raises hell trying to get them off. Petroleum will dissolve rubber. >> >> >>-------------------------------------------- >>On Thu, 2/18/16, Bradley Nation wrote: >> >> Subject: Kolb-List: Tire Replacement >> To: "Kolb-list" >> Date: Thursday, February 18, 2016, 12:01 AM >> >> Bradley Nation >> >> Im try to replace my tires on my Xtra but so far I am >> unable to remove them from the Matco split rims. It >> seems that the beed sealer is being uncooperative (Im >> thinking its really epoxy or perhaps someone has found a >> new method to vulcanize rubber to metal). I havent found >> any tire shop that will work on that size of wheel. >> Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Brad Nation >> >> >> >> Lists This Month -- >> Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!) >> Raiser. Click on >> more about >> Gifts provided >> www.buildersbooks.com >> -Matt >> Dralle, List Admin. >> Forum - >> - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - >> List Contribution Web Site - >> -Matt >> Dralle, List Admin. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >-- >Signature text; Fort Marcy Park? Sure...Mr. >Foster...Third red light and turn left. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: ALASK or bust
From: "west1m" <west1m(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 20, 2016
I also did the trip by motorcycle in 2006. I think the most fun I had was in Chicken... -------- West1m Hastings, MN Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453028#453028 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/alaska_241.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 21, 2016
Subject: Re: ALASK or bust
From: undoctor <undoctor(at)rcn.com>
Tm9uLUtvbGIgYWxlcnQuIEFsc28gcm9kZSBteSBjeWNsZSBmcm9tIFBBIHRvIHRoZSBBdGlndW4g UGFzcy4gV2VudCBlYXN0IG9uIFRvcCBvZiB0aGUgV29ybGQgSGlnaHdheSB0b3dhcmQgRGF3c29u IENpdHkgb24gcmV0dXJuIGhvbWUgYW5kIHN0b3BwZWQgYXQgQ2hpY2tlbiBmb3Igc3VwcGVyLiBC b3JkZXIgd2FzIGNsb3NlZCB1bnRpbCBBTSBzbyB3ZSB0YWxrZWQuIEFza2VkIHdoZXJlIHRoZXkg bGl2ZWQgYmVmb3JlIHRoZXkgYm91Z2h0IENoaWNrZW4gYW5kIHNoZSBzYWlkLCAiQSBsaXR0bGUg cGxhY2UgaW4gdGhlIGxvd2VyIDQ4LCBhIHRvd24gaW4gUEEKbmFtZWQgTmV3IEhvcGUuIiDCoCJJ IHJ1biBMYW5zZGFsZSB0byBGbGVtaW5ndG9uIDUgZGF5cyBhIHdlZWsuIiAod2hpY2ggaXMgcmln aHQgdGhyb3VnaCBOZXcgSG9wZSkgSSByZXNwb25kZWQuIFNtYWxsIHdvcmxkIG1vbWVudC7CoAoK U2VudCBmcm9tIG15IFZlcml6b24gV2lyZWxlc3MgNEcgTFRFIHNtYXJ0cGhvbmUKCjxkaXY+LS0t LS0tLS0gT3JpZ2luYWwgbWVzc2FnZSAtLS0tLS0tLTwvZGl2PjxkaXY+RnJvbTogd2VzdDFtIDx3 ZXN0MW1AaG90bWFpbC5jb20+IDwvZGl2PjxkaXY+RGF0ZTowMi8yMC8yMDE2ICA1OjAyIFBNICAo R01ULTA1OjAwKSA8L2Rpdj48ZGl2PlRvOiBrb2xiLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbSA8L2Rpdj48 ZGl2PlN1YmplY3Q6IEtvbGItTGlzdDogUmU6IEFMQVNLIG9yIGJ1c3QgPC9kaXY+PGRpdj4KPC9k aXY+LS0+IEtvbGItTGlzdCBtZXNzYWdlIHBvc3RlZCBieTogIndlc3QxbSIgPHdlc3QxbUBob3Rt YWlsLmNvbT4KCkkgYWxzbyBkaWQgdGhlIHRyaXAgYnkgbW90b3JjeWNsZSBpbiAyMDA2LgpJIHRo aW5rIHRoZSBtb3N0IGZ1biBJIGhhZCB3YXMgaW4gQ2hpY2tlbi4uLgoKLS0tLS0tLS0KV2VzdDFt Ckhhc3RpbmdzLCBNTgoKCgoKUmVhZCB0aGlzIHRvcGljIG9ubGluZSBoZXJlOgoKaHR0cDovL2Zv cnVtcy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL3ZpZXd0b3BpYy5waHA/cD00NTMwMjgjNDUzMDI4CgoKCgpBdHRh Y2htZW50czogCgpodHRwOi8vZm9ydW1zLm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vL2ZpbGVzL2FsYXNrYV8yNDEu anBnCgoKCgpfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PQpfLT0KXy09ICAgICAgIC0tIFBsZWFzZSBTdXBwb3J0IFlvdXIgTGlzdHMg VGhpcyBNb250aCAtLQpfLT0gICAgICAgICAgIChBbmQgR2V0IFNvbWUgQVdFU09NRSBGUkVFIEdp ZnRzISkKXy09Cl8tPSAgIE5vdmVtYmVyIGlzIHRoZSBBbm51YWwgTGlzdCBGdW5kIFJhaXNlci4g IENsaWNrIG9uCl8tPSAgIHRoZSBDb250cmlidXRpb24gbGluayBiZWxvdyB0byBmaW5kIG91dCBt b3JlIGFib3V0Cl8tPSAgIHRoaXMgeWVhcidzIFRlcnJpZmljIEZyZWUgSW5jZW50aXZlIEdpZnRz IHByb3ZpZGVkCl8tPSAgIGJ5OgpfLT0gICAKXy09ICAgICAqIFRoZSBCdWlsZGVyJ3MgQm9va3N0 b3JlIHd3dy5idWlsZGVyc2Jvb2tzLmNvbQpfLT0KXy09ICAgTGlzdCBDb250cmlidXRpb24gV2Vi IFNpdGU6Cl8tPQpfLT0gICAtLT4gaHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL2NvbnRyaWJ1dGlv bgpfLT0KXy09ICAgVGhhbmsgeW91IGZvciB5b3VyIGdlbmVyb3VzIHN1cHBvcnQhCl8tPQpfLT0g ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAtTWF0dCBEcmFsbGUsIExpc3QgQWRtaW4uCl8t PQpfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PQpfLT0gICAgICAgICAgLSBUaGUgS29sYi1MaXN0IEVtYWlsIEZvcnVtIC0KXy09IFVz ZSB0aGUgTWF0cm9uaWNzIExpc3QgRmVhdHVyZXMgTmF2aWdhdG9yIHRvIGJyb3dzZQpfLT0gdGhl IG1hbnkgTGlzdCB1dGlsaXRpZXMgc3VjaCBhcyBMaXN0IFVuL1N1YnNjcmlwdGlvbiwKXy09IEFy Y2hpdmUgU2VhcmNoICYgRG93bmxvYWQsIDctRGF5IEJyb3dzZSwgQ2hhdCwgRkFRLApfLT0gUGhv dG9zaGFyZSwgYW5kIG11Y2ggbXVjaCBtb3JlOgpfLT0KXy09ICAgLS0+IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0 cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9OYXZpZ2F0b3I/S29sYi1MaXN0Cl8tPQpfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQpfLT0gICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAtIE1BVFJPTklDUyBXRUIgRk9SVU1TIC0KXy09IFNhbWUgZ3JlYXQgY29udGVudCBhbHNvIGF2 YWlsYWJsZSB2aWEgdGhlIFdlYiBGb3J1bXMhCl8tPQpfLT0gICAtLT4gaHR0cDovL2ZvcnVtcy5t YXRyb25pY3MuY29tCl8tPQpfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQpfLT0gICAgICAgICAgICAgLSBMaXN0IENvbnRyaWJ1dGlv biBXZWIgU2l0ZSAtCl8tPSAgVGhhbmsgeW91IGZvciB5b3VyIGdlbmVyb3VzIHN1cHBvcnQhCl8t PSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIC1NYXR0IERyYWxsZSwgTGlzdCBBZG1pbi4K Xy09ICAgLS0+IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9jb250cmlidXRpb24KXy09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0KCgoK ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: ALASK or bust
From: "west1m" <west1m(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 21, 2016
OOPS! more non Kolb, but it a bit slow anyway... My wife and I also went in 1979 when the whole way was dirt. We drove this old Corviar (They use those motors in airplanes right??) and three of my buddies followed us in a VW bus. He went through a couple of motors and I went through a couple of trannies. New parts were non existent. We passed this area. it was a row of signs then, when I saw it in 2006, it was a city of signs. -------- West1m Hastings, MN Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453041#453041 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/vuescan81_238.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 21, 2016
Subject: AOA revisited
From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com>
Well the runway finally dried out and the wind momentarily quit blowing, and I ran out of excuses. I rolled the plane out and went out to do some touch and go'es and I took some videos of the basic AOA indicator, and will work on organizing them later. I wanted to find out how much movement there would be from level flight, Wing at 9 degrees, and stall. I built a vane that was 5 1/2 inches long. Picture is attachment "aoa 1". I then put a piece of tape on the inside of the wind screen marked by inches. I located this entire set up on the wrap around wind screen just in front of my knee, figuring that I could see it out of my perifial vision while I was checking the ASI. It was visible to the eye, but not in a very good position to record on a video camera. Regardless of that I found that the plane flew flat and level at the 9 degree mark that I had put on the screen, and began to burble at a level that was 1 5/8 from that mark. The only surprise was that I would rarely on purpose fly the plane that close to a stall. Of course I have about 655 hours on this plane so it is no surprise that I have developed defenses against screwing it up. The things that I learned from this are: That the plane will be very difficult if not impossible to stall at full throttle. At least it is very difficult for me to pull it up that much. That the vane is not a necessity. a piece of yarn would do just as well, and while not as "swavey" as a lighted AOA, is just as visible. Because of the design of the Kolb, there is very little time and not enough inertia for one to fool around when approaching a stall, and be able to recover before something bad happened. An 11 inch piece of yarn would be showing 3 1/4 inches approaching burble. The yarn would also eliminate the problem of some yoyo messing with a metal vane. It would also give you enough warning that even approaching a stall would be quite obvious. I was happy to learn that I didn't seem to be all that rusty even though I haven't flown for several months, and that I still enjoyed it. The tires as you may remember were secured with some expensive stainless steel 3/4 inch screws, 12 per tire. I put 6 pounds of pressure in them when I originally fixed the tires. One of my landings I was paying more attention to the AOA than landing and I dropped it from about a foot off the ground. The cushion was quite noticeable and not unpleasant. I am quite pleased and happy that I did it. Larry -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Brad Nation <nationcap(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Tire Replacement
Date: Feb 21, 2016
Thanks for all the suggestions and help. I finally got the tires off with the help of a Harbor Freight mini tire changer. It took a bit but worked like a charm. One question though, there was a busted O-Ring inside one of the tires between the wheel halfs but not the other and I couldn=99t tell where it went. Any comments or suggestions? Brad ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Tire Replacement
Date: Feb 21, 2016
I run tubes in my MKIII. Don't need the o rings in MATCOs with tubes. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Brad Nation Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 8:21 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Tire Replacement Thanks for all the suggestions and help. I finally got the tires off with the help of a Harbor Freight mini tire changer. It took a bit but worked like a charm. One question though, there was a busted O-Ring inside one of the tires between the wheel halfs but not the other and I couldn=99t tell where it went. Any comments or suggestions? Brad ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Tire Replacement
From: Gary Aman <zeprep251(at)aol.com>
Date: Feb 21, 2016
Think the o ring makes it tubeless Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 21, 2016, at 9:21 PM, Brad Nation wrote: > > Thanks for all the suggestions and help. I finally got the tires off with the help of a Harbor Freight mini tire changer. It took a bit but worked l ike a charm. > One question though, there was a busted O-Ring inside one of the tires bet ween the wheel halfs but not the other and I couldn=99t tell where it w ent. Any comments or suggestions? > > Brad > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Brad Nation <nationcap(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Tire Replacement
Date: Feb 21, 2016
I=99m using tubs as well. So perhaps the O-ring was left over from the previous owner. Brad Nation MKIII Xtra Albuquerque, NM ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "George Bearden" <gab16(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Tire Replacement
Date: Feb 21, 2016
When I change motorcycle tires I use the weight of my F250. I lay the tire under the edge of the truck, somewhere near the middle for convenience. I have a stout long 4x4 I use for a lever. I put a short 2x4 on the tire, extending up. The end of the 4x4 goes under the truck frame, the 2x4 gets pushed down when I push down on the 4x4. You can get 500-700# pressure easily this way. But you'll have to come here to do it unless you supply your own truck. :-) Actually I hinged the short 2x4 to the 4x4 for much easier working, but I dint wanna confuse anyone. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 23, 2016
Subject: AOA video
From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com>
https://vimeo.com/156368644 password- owyheeflyer This is the video that I took while testing my crude wind vane to get some idea of how much movement would be expected leading up to a stall. I intended to do it last night, but when I looked at the video of the GPS speed, I about convinced my self that I had not stalled after all. I really had run it until it began to burble, and saw no need to go any further than that. Then when I saw that the GPS speed was 40 MPH, I was confused until I realized that I was doing my stalls down wind, and the ASI was showing 29 MPH. I guess that is the reason they say that the stall speed can change, but the Angle of Attack will not. It was too windy to fly today, but I have changed out the vane and replaced it with a 12 inch piece of yarn. I will mark it where I expect it to stall, and by lengthening it, the ability to see when it will stall will be at least doubled by the longer piece of yarn. Larry -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: AOA video
From: "Richard Pike" <thegreybaron(at)charter.net>
Date: Feb 23, 2016
Thank you for doing that. Finished the winter maintenance on the MKIII, did a couple test flights and am now airworthy again, however my AOA meter is still sitting on the work bench awaiting the arrival of the gauge itself. So your comments have given me an idea of what baseline alignment ought to be. -------- Richard Pike Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Kingsport, TN 3TN0 Would you consider yourself to be a good person? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWcDXT6pH7A Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453082#453082 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: AOA video
Date: Feb 23, 2016
Forget about ground speed when flying, except to calculate your ETA back to the barn. Easy to screw up turning base to final, near the stall, with a little tail wind. Perceived ground speed is high, air speed is low. That is why I continually cross check my ASI. Takes a split second to scan. Doesn't cost anything. ;-) john h mkIII Titus, Alabama From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Larry Cottrell Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 1:39 AM Subject: Kolb-List: AOA video https://vimeo.com/156368644 password- owyheeflyer This is the video that I took while testing my crude wind vane to get some idea of how much movement would be expected leading up to a stall. I intended to do it last night, but when I looked at the video of the GPS speed, I about convinced my self that I had not stalled after all. I really had run it until it began to burble, and saw no need to go any further than that. Then when I saw that the GPS speed was 40 MPH, I was confused until I realized that I was doing my stalls down wind, and the ASI was showing 29 MPH. I guess that is the reason they say that the stall speed can change, but the Angle of Attack will not. It was too windy to fly today, but I have changed out the vane and replaced it with a 12 inch piece of yarn. I will mark it where I expect it to stall, and by lengthening it, the ability to see when it will stall will be at least doubled by the longer piece of yarn. Larry -- The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant. If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: AOA video
From: Charlie England <ceengland7(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 23, 2016
On 2/23/2016 1:38 AM, Larry Cottrell wrote: > https://vimeo.com/156368644 password- owyheeflyer > > This is the video that I took while testing my crude wind vane to get > some idea of how much movement would be expected leading up to a > stall. I intended to do it last night, but when I looked at the video > of the GPS speed, I about convinced my self that I had not stalled > after all. I really had run it until it began to burble, and saw no > need to go any further than that. Then when I saw that the GPS speed > was 40 MPH, I was confused until I realized that I was doing my stalls > down wind, and the ASI was showing 29 MPH. I guess that is the reason > they say that the stall speed can change, but the Angle of Attack will > not. > > It was too windy to fly today, but I have changed out the vane and > replaced it with a 12 inch piece of yarn. I will mark it where I > expect it to stall, and by lengthening it, the ability to see when it > will stall will be at least doubled by the longer piece of yarn. > > Larry GPS ground speed is irrelevant to stall speed, just as it's irrelevant to airspeed in general. Stall indicated airspeed changes with weight, assuming a 1 G stall. (Stall *true* airspeed changes with density altitude.) To see the effects of changing indicated airspeed at stall, get your AOA working consistently and reliably, and fly a stall series with minimal fuel and as light a payload as possible. Note the indicated airspeed and AOA at stall. Then load the plane up with full fuel and max payload to gross weight, and fly another stall series. You should see a higher indicated airspeed at stall, but the same AOA. (GPS ground speed can vary all over the map, depending on wind speed/direction at that moment & your heading when doing the stall series.) Charlie ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 23, 2016
Subject: AOA test 2
From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com>
https://vimeo.com/156496788 password- owyheeflyer I replaced the vane with a piece of yarn that was 12 inches long, reasoning that a longer indicator would allow better decisions- sooner. I was quite happy with the results, and found that the longer yarn did give ample warning before stall. Larry -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: AOA test 2
Date: Feb 23, 2016
Looked like it worked pretty good, except for the tail flutter. Beautiful day at the Rock House. We are, and have been most of the day and night, under severe tornado watch. Can't tell it by me. john From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Larry Cottrell Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 8:20 PM Subject: Kolb-List: AOA test 2 https://vimeo.com/156496788 password- owyheeflyer I replaced the vane with a piece of yarn that was 12 inches long, reasoning that a longer indicator would allow better decisions- sooner. I was quite happy with the results, and found that the longer yarn did give ample warning before stall. Larry -- The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant. If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 23, 2016
Subject: Re: AOA test 2
From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com>
The tail flutter was during the stall. I also noticed that the air vent would bang open during a stall. Hope it misses you. Larry On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:28 PM, John Hauck wrote: > Looked like it worked pretty good, except for the tail flutter. > > > Beautiful day at the Rock House. > > > We are, and have been most of the day and night, under severe tornado > watch. Can't tell it by me. > > > john > > > *From:* owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto: > owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Larry Cottrell > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 23, 2016 8:20 PM > *To:* kolb-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* Kolb-List: AOA test 2 > > > https://vimeo.com/156496788 password- owyheeflyer > > > I replaced the vane with a piece of yarn that was 12 inches long, > reasoning that a longer indicator would allow better decisions- sooner. I > was quite happy with the results, and found that the longer yarn did give > ample warning before stall. > > Larry > > > -- > > *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* > > > *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email > address before sending.* > -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 23, 2016
Subject: Re: AOA test 2
From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com>
Hopefully the weather will hold. I just heard from Richard at 12 mile, that there is supposed to be a herd of Elk that numbers about 650 hanging out in the Bowden Hills. Need to go see. Larry On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:28 PM, John Hauck wrote: > Looked like it worked pretty good, except for the tail flutter. > > > Beautiful day at the Rock House. > > > We are, and have been most of the day and night, under severe tornado > watch. Can't tell it by me. > > > john > > > *From:* owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto: > owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Larry Cottrell > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 23, 2016 8:20 PM > *To:* kolb-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* Kolb-List: AOA test 2 > > > https://vimeo.com/156496788 password- owyheeflyer > > > I replaced the vane with a piece of yarn that was 12 inches long, > reasoning that a longer indicator would allow better decisions- sooner. I > was quite happy with the results, and found that the longer yarn did give > ample warning before stall. > > Larry > > > -- > > *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* > > > *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email > address before sending.* > -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: AOA test 2
From: Herb <Herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Date: Feb 24, 2016
Maybe the Elk are having a caucus?? :-) Herb On 02/23/2016 10:20 PM, Larry Cottrell wrote: > Hopefully the weather will hold. I just heard from Richard at 12 mile, > that there is supposed to be a herd of Elk that numbers about 650 > hanging out in the Bowden Hills. Need to go see. > Larry > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:28 PM, John Hauck > wrote: > > Looked like it worked pretty good, except for the tail flutter. > > Beautiful day at the Rock House. > > We are, and have been most of the day and night, under severe > tornado watch.Can't tell it by me. > > john > > *From:*owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com > > [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com > ] *On Behalf Of > *Larry Cottrell > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 23, 2016 8:20 PM > *To:* kolb-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* Kolb-List: AOA test 2 > > https://vimeo.com/156496788 password- owyheeflyer > > I replaced the vane with a piece of yarn that was 12 inches long, > reasoning that a longer indicator would allow better decisions- > sooner. I was quite happy with the results, and found that the > longer yarn did give ample warning before stall. > > Larry > > -- > > /The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant./ > > /If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my > email address before sending./ > > > -- > /The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant./ > / > / > /If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email > address before sending./ -- Signature text; Fort Marcy Park? Sure...Mr. Foster...Third red light and turn left. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Patrick Ladd <patrickjladd(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: list activity
Date: Feb 24, 2016
I have solved the problem of the lack of list activity (I think). For some reason the posts have gone into `junk mail`. Never happened before. I blame Windows 10. Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 24, 2016
Subject: Re: AOA test 2
From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com>
I must have been tired, it was Kolb related, but unintended. :-/ Larry Herb via matronics.com 12:15 AM (8 hours ago) to kolb-list Maybe the Elk are having a caucus?? :-) Herb On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:15 AM, Herb wrote: > Maybe the Elk are having a caucus?? :-) Herb > > On 02/23/2016 10:20 PM, Larry Cottrell wrote: > > Hopefully the weather will hold. I just heard from Richard at 12 mile, > that there is supposed to be a herd of Elk that numbers about 650 hanging > out in the Bowden Hills. Need to go see. > Larry > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:28 PM, John Hauck wrote: > >> Looked like it worked pretty good, except for the tail flutter. >> >> >> >> Beautiful day at the Rock House. >> >> >> >> We are, and have been most of the day and night, under severe tornado >> watch. Can't tell it by me. >> >> >> >> john >> >> >> >> *From:* owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto: >> owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Larry Cottrell >> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 23, 2016 8:20 PM >> *To:* kolb-list(at)matronics.com >> *Subject:* Kolb-List: AOA test 2 >> >> >> >> https://vimeo.com/156496788 password- >> owyheeflyer >> >> >> >> I replaced the vane with a piece of yarn that was 12 inches long, >> reasoning that a longer indicator would allow better decisions- sooner. I >> was quite happy with the results, and found that the longer yarn did give >> ample warning before stall. >> >> Larry >> >> >> >> -- >> >> *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* >> >> >> >> *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email >> address before sending.* >> > > > -- > *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* > > *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email > address before sending.* > > > -- > Signature text; Fort Marcy Park? Sure...Mr. Foster...Third red light and turn left. > > -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: AOA video
From: "keith keith" <kac_86(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Feb 24, 2016
i'am new to kolbs bought one last spring , now have 15 hrs. have slowed to 30 mph and called it a stall, but realty didn't, has anyone held it so it reacted significantly ? I want to know what it will do. thanks keith Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453123#453123 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 24, 2016
From: Bill Berle <victorbravo(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: list activity
I blame Windows 8 for the decline of humanity, famine, flood, locusts, and the AIDS virus. Windows 10 will be even worse I'm afraid. Bill Berle www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and for-profit entities -------------------------------------------- On Wed, 2/24/16, Patrick Ladd wrote: Subject: Kolb-List: list activity To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Date: Wednesday, February 24, 2016, 5:41 AM I have solved the problem of the lack of list activity (I think). For some reason the posts have gone into `junk mail`. Never happened before. I blame Windows 10. Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: list activity
From: Herb <Herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Date: Feb 24, 2016
Speaking of mans inhumanity to man....anyone talked to Travis lately....I have called his home several times to no avail.... Travis is my bud..even though he seemed to always grab a few hundred dollar bills out of my pocket each time I visited... gotta run down to London, to the factory , one day soon... Getting ready to start on a "sort of Firestar"....and need some parts... This may be the nose driver plane...that I have thought about for some time...half vw engine..that I have on hand...similar to the Bill Bronson design... may call it the "Ugly Star" ! :-) Under two gals an hour...84 lb engine...should be a good project...Herb ps know I have said this several times before...but Linux Mint 17.3 , once installed and climbing the learning curve...will make one quite independent...of Microsoft... and I have nothing against that company... can install in a dual boot environment....so one can keep the current operating system...Just allocate a few gigs of hard drive space to it...and the install is simple,,, On 02/24/2016 11:56 AM, Bill Berle wrote: > > I blame Windows 8 for the decline of humanity, famine, flood, locusts, and the AIDS virus. Windows 10 will be even worse I'm afraid. > > Bill Berle > www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft > www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and for-profit entities > > -------------------------------------------- > On Wed, 2/24/16, Patrick Ladd wrote: > > Subject: Kolb-List: list activity > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Wednesday, February 24, 2016, 5:41 AM > > > > > > I have solved the problem of the lack of list activity > (I think). For some > reason the posts have gone into `junk mail`. Never happened > before. I blame > Windows 10. Pat > > -- Signature text; Fort Marcy Park? Sure...Mr. Foster...Third red light and turn left. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: list activity
From: kinne russ <russk50(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 24, 2016
Bill B I hear your comments and agree. Why dont you get a Mac? Theres good reason why they cost twice as much. Theyre worth it. This is Kolb-related somehow. Kolbers, ditch your PCs and get Macs! Russ K > On Feb 24, 2016, at 12:56 PM, Bill Berle wrote: > > > I blame Windows 8 for the decline of humanity, famine, flood, locusts, and the AIDS virus. Windows 10 will be even worse I'm afraid. > > Bill Berle > www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft > www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and for-profit entities > > -------------------------------------------- > On Wed, 2/24/16, Patrick Ladd wrote: > > Subject: Kolb-List: list activity > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Wednesday, February 24, 2016, 5:41 AM > > > > > > I have solved the problem of the lack of list activity > (I think). For some > reason the posts have gone into `junk mail`. Never happened > before. I blame > Windows 10. Pat > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: list activity
From: "Richard Pike" <thegreybaron(at)charter.net>
Date: Feb 24, 2016
Travis is on FaceBook, posting pictures of old cars, pickin a banjo, and eating. https://www.facebook.com/travis.brown.14418?fref=ts -------- Richard Pike Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Kingsport, TN 3TN0 Would you consider yourself to be a good person? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWcDXT6pH7A Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453131#453131 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 24, 2016
From: Bill Berle <victorbravo(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: list activity
I bought a little Android tablet computer and downloaded the AvAre moving map GPS thing. Works beautifully, even for me as a computer non-expert. To power this tablet in-flight all I need is a USB port somewhere in the plane to plug it into, and I will have the ability to fly a Kolb (or my 172) with the precision of a $500M airliner. Apple decided to build some or all of their products without a USB port. In an age where USB devices provide almost unlimited options, capabilities, devices, etc..... Apple turning up its nose at the USB (and not providing any alternative) is just the height of arrogance. What if I manufactured a new car that didn't have air conditioning, and air conditioning was not an option, because I just didn't want you to have it available? It wouldn't matter if the car got better mileage or was prettier; you simply could not have something that the majority of car owners want. In my case, my Kolb (just bought a used FS kit) may not have electrical power. But thankfully, my tablet can be recharged by little portable battery power units that I can take with me. What a great option for me to have! Guess where those battery power units plug in to the tablet? Bill Berle www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and for-profit entities -------------------------------------------- On Wed, 2/24/16, kinne russ wrote: Subject: Re: Kolb-List: list activity To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Date: Wednesday, February 24, 2016, 12:03 PM kinne russ Bill B I hear your comments and agree. Why dont you get a Mac? Theres good reason why they cost twice as much. Theyre worth it. This is Kolb-related somehow. Kolbers, ditch your PCs and get Macs! Russ K > On Feb 24, 2016, at 12:56 PM, Bill Berle wrote: > > > I blame Windows 8 for the decline of humanity, famine, flood, locusts, and the AIDS virus. Windows 10 will be even worse I'm afraid. > > Bill Berle > www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft > www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and for-profit entities > > -------------------------------------------- > On Wed, 2/24/16, Patrick Ladd wrote: > > Subject: Kolb-List: list activity > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Wednesday, February 24, 2016, 5:41 AM > > > > > > I have solved the problem of the lack of list activity > (I think). For some > reason the posts have gone into `junk mail`. Never happened > before. I blame > Windows 10. Pat > > > > > Lists This Month -- Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!) Raiser. Click on more about Gifts provided www.buildersbooks.com -Matt Dralle, List Admin. Forum - - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - List Contribution Web Site - -Matt Dralle, List Admin. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 24, 2016
Subject: another video
From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com>
Yesterday I inadvertently posted that I was going to check for some Elk, so today I did so. None were to be found! I took some video anyway, and figured I would share. From the looks of things you are not having very nice weather in the East, but it was nice here today. A bit cool 42 degrees when I took off. https://vimeo.com/156633142 password owyheeflyer Larry -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________________________________________________________
From: kinne russ <russk50(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: another video
Date: Feb 24, 2016
A bit cool????? I workt in -63F once. your temps re near-tropical. But many thanx your videos. Look forward to seeing some elk, sometime Fair winds, Russ K > On Feb 24, 2016, at 7:58 PM, Larry Cottrell wrote: > > Yesterday I inadvertently posted that I was going to check for some Elk, so today I did so. None were to be found! I took some video anyway, and figured I would share. =46rom the looks of things you are not having very nice weather in the East, but it was nice here today. A bit cool 42 degrees when I took off. > > https://vimeo.com/156633142 password owyheeflyer > > Larry > > -- > The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant. > > If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: another video
From: "west1m" <west1m(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 24, 2016
Thanks for the Video Larry! It's too cold for me to consider flyin' yet, good to see you out and about. -------- West1m Hastings, MN Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453152#453152 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Patrick Ladd <patrickjladd(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: another video
Date: Feb 25, 2016
Nice video as always. Thanks. pity about the elk. Still, they are not very bright and have probably gone off to vote for Trump!!!. Pat From: Larry Cottrell Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 12:58 AM Subject: Kolb-List: another video Yesterday I inadvertently posted that I was going to check for some Elk, so today I did so. None were to be found! I took some video anyway, and figured I would share. From the looks of things you are not having very nice weather in the East, but it was nice here today. A bit cool 42 degrees when I took off. https://vimeo.com/156633142 password owyheeflyer Larry -- The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant. If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: another video
From: Herb <Herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Date: Feb 25, 2016
All right Patrick!! Did you mother call you by your proper name when you were a bad boy!! :-) Herb On 02/25/2016 04:05 AM, Patrick Ladd wrote: > Nice video as always. Thanks. pity about the elk. Still, they are not > very bright and have probably gone off to vote for Trump!!!. Pat > *From:* Larry Cottrell > *Sent:* Thursday, February 25, 2016 12:58 AM > *To:* kolb-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* Kolb-List: another video > Yesterday I inadvertently posted that I was going to check for some > Elk, so today I did so. None were to be found! I took some video > anyway, and figured I would share. From the looks of things you are > not having very nice weather in the East, but it was nice here today. > A bit cool 42 degrees when I took off. > https://vimeo.com/156633142 password owyheeflyer > Larry > -- > /The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant./ > / > / > /If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email > address before sending./ -- Signature text; Fort Marcy Park? Sure...Mr. Foster...Third red light and turn left. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: K I <wrk2win4u(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: another video
Date: Feb 25, 2016
Excellent video Larry, as usual! Kurt Twinstar Mark III Sent from my iPhone On Feb 24, 2016, at 18:03, Larry Cottrell > wrote: Yesterday I inadvertently posted that I was going to check for some Elk, so today I did so. None were to be found! I took some video anyway, and figur ed I would share. From the looks of things you are not having very nice wea ther in the East, but it was nice here today. A bit cool 42 degrees when I took off. https://vimeo.com/156633142 password owyheeflyer Larry -- The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant. If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email addres s before sending. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 25, 2016
From: Bill Berle <victorbravo(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: another video
The fact that our situation has gotten to the point where Trump or Hillary are the two most viable candidates to lead the nation.... THAT is the larger problem. It's a significant failure of both the Democratic and Republican party systems that they could not put forth a Kennedy, or a Reagan, or an Eisenhower, or a Truman. Anyway, with that off my chest, I'm waiting for my Firestar kit to arrive, and I can't wait to get started on it. Can anyone here tell me which is the best or best compromise choice for wheels brakes and tires, for my particular intended use? I will be building up this Firestar specifically as an off-airport, back country, extreme STOL aircraft to explore small landing areas. I want to do the hilltops, and small mountain meadows, and dirt trails, the small clearings, etc. So for this I need large tires and good brakes. Which combinations of wheels/brakes/tires have been successful on the Kolb aircraft for this type of mission? Bill Berle -------------------------------------------- On Thu, 2/25/16, Herb wrote: Subject: Re: Kolb-List: another video To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Date: Thursday, February 25, 2016, 4:45 AM All right Patrick!! Did you mother call you by your proper name when you were a bad boy!! :-) Herb On 02/25/2016 04:05 AM, Patrick Ladd wrote: Nice video as always. Thanks. pity about the elk. Still, they are not very bright and have probably gone off to vote for Trump!!!. Pat From: Larry Cottrell Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 12:58 AM To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Kolb-List: another video Yesterday I inadvertently posted that I was going to check for some Elk, so today I did so. None were to be found! I took some video anyway, and figured I would share. From the looks of things you are not having very nice weather in the East, but it was nice here today. A bit cool 42 degrees when I took off. https://vimeo.com/156633142 password owyheeflyer Larry -- The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant. If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending. -- Signature text; Fort Marcy Park? Sure...Mr. Foster...Third red light and turn left. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: another video
From: Dave Kulp <undoctor(at)rcn.com>
Date: Feb 25, 2016
Bill, This is a very friendly forum and injecting politics into it is a sure way to reduce that great quality. Please keep your political opinions at the poker table. Thanks. Good luck building your Firestar. There's lots of good advice to be had here, so don't hesitate to ask. Dave Kulp Bethlehem, PA On 2/25/2016 12:53 PM, Bill Berle wrote: > > The fact that our situation has gotten to the point where Trump or Hillary are the two most viable candidates to lead the nation.... THAT is the larger problem. It's a significant failure of both the Democratic and Republican party systems that they could not put forth a Kennedy, or a Reagan, or an Eisenhower, or a Truman. > > Anyway, with that off my chest, I'm waiting for my Firestar kit to arrive, and I can't wait to get started on it. Can anyone here tell me which is the best or best compromise choice for wheels brakes and tires, for my particular intended use? I will be building up this Firestar specifically as an off-airport, back country, extreme STOL aircraft to explore small landing areas. I want to do the hilltops, and small mountain meadows, and dirt trails, the small clearings, etc. So for this I need large tires and good brakes. > > Which combinations of wheels/brakes/tires have been successful on the Kolb aircraft for this type of mission? > > Bill Berle > > > -------------------------------------------- > On Thu, 2/25/16, Herb wrote: > > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: another video > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Thursday, February 25, 2016, 4:45 AM > > > All right Patrick!! Did you mother call you by your > proper name > when you were a bad boy!! :-) Herb > > > > On 02/25/2016 04:05 AM, > Patrick Ladd > wrote: > > > > > > Nice video as always. Thanks. pity about the > elk. Still, > they are not very bright and have probably gone > off to vote > for Trump!!!. Pat > > > > > From: Larry > Cottrell > > Sent: Thursday, February 25, > 2016 12:58 AM > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > > Subject: Kolb-List: another > video > > > > > > Yesterday I inadvertently posted > that I was > going to check for some Elk, so today I did > so. None were > to be found! I took some video anyway, and > figured I would > share. From the looks of things you are not > having very > nice weather in the East, but it was nice here > today. A > bit cool 42 degrees when I took off. > > https://vimeo.com/156633142 > password owyheeflyer > > Larry > > > -- > > > > > > The > older I get, the less tolerant > I am of > those who are > intolerant. > > > > If you forward this email, > or any part > of it, please remove my email > address before > sending. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Signature text; Fort Marcy Park? Sure...Mr. Foster...Third > red light and turn left. > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 25, 2016
Subject: Re: another video
From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com>
One of the tire companies is now making "tundra tires" that will fit on the 6 inch rims that most are using. There was a recent (last 6 months) I think from Nick Cassara about them. Fairly spendy however. I have 800 x 6 on my firestar with the tires secured by screws so that I can run 6 lbs of air. Other wise the tires spin when you land and shear off the valve stems. I personally prefer individual brakes, and a breakaway tail wheel. You will also need to brace the tail post, so that it can withstand the pressures put on it by the individual braking. I have 6 inch mech brakes, and it seems to be able to do the job for me. I got on them a bit hard last year and it caused the plane to do little jumps as it was bouncing the plane back up in the air. So I know that I get all the braking that I need. I would prefer ?possibly? the hydrallic ones but that requires buying two entire systems to have individual. You will of course need VG's, and for that I would recommend JC Gilpin. http://www.stolspeed.com/ Then of course you will need the 36 inch long tempered steel gear legs, making sure that you have the heavy duty axle fittings. I also recommend a Spot tracking unit, so that if worse comes to worse they will know where to find you. That will give you the best possibility to survive what you plan to do. The only other thing that you will need is training, and some pretty big cahones. Larry On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Bill Berle wrote: > > > Anyway, with that off my chest, I'm waiting for my Firestar kit to arrive, > and I can't wait to get started on it. Can anyone here tell me which is the > best or best compromise choice for wheels brakes and tires, for my > particular intended use? I will be building up this Firestar specifically > as an off-airport, back country, extreme STOL aircraft to explore small > landing areas. I want to do the hilltops, and small mountain meadows, and > dirt trails, the small clearings, etc. So for this I need large tires and > good brakes. > > Which combinations of wheels/brakes/tires have been successful on the Kolb > aircraft for this type of mission? > > Bill > > -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 25, 2016
From: Bill Berle <victorbravo(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: another video
Larry how do you put screws into the tires without puncturing the inner tube, or generating cracks in the rim? If I'm seeing your photo right, are you flying your FS up there in NV someplace? Where are you based? I am planning on VG's (I know, I know... some people think they work and others don't), and I am planning on an aluminum sheeted leading edge, and some other STOL mods bouncing around in my head. Larry does your FS have flaperons, or separate flaps, or no flap features? I do have a little bit of training already, although it is not the formal back country training like you can take classes in Idaho. I was once a sailplane racer in the western US, and I've had my share of off-airport landings in the gilders, in some really strange places (like the helicopter pad at the USMC Mountain Warfare training facility in Bridgeport). I will be starting off a little conservatively, especially since it will be a new type of aircraft for me. Tell me about bracing the tailpost... braced in which direction, and braced to what? Bill Berle www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and for-profit entities -------------------------------------------- On Thu, 2/25/16, Larry Cottrell wrote: Subject: Re: Kolb-List: another video To: "kolb-list(at)matronics.com" Date: Thursday, February 25, 2016, 11:00 AM One of the tire companies is now making "tundra tires" that will fit on the 6 inch rims that most are using. There was a recent (last 6 months) I think from Nick Cassara about them. Fairly spendy however. I have 800 x 6 on my firestar with the tires secured by screws so that I can run 6 lbs of air. Other wise the tires spin when you land and shear off the valve stems. I personally prefer individual brakes, and a breakaway tail wheel. You will also need to brace the tail post, so that it can withstand the pressures put on it by the individual braking. I have 6 inch mech brakes, and it seems to be able to do the job for me. I got on them a bit hard last year and it caused the plane to do little jumps as it was bouncing the plane back up in the air. So I know that I get all the braking that I need. I would prefer ?possibly? the hydrallic ones but that requires buying two entire systems to have individual. You will of course need VG's, and for that I would recommend JC Gilpin. http://www.stolspeed.com/ Then of course you will need the 36 inch long tempered steel gear legs, making sure that you have the heavy duty axle fittings. I also recommend a Spot tracking unit, so that if worse comes to worse they will know where to find you. That will give you the best possibility to survive what you plan to do. The only other thing that you will need is training, and some pretty big cahones.Larry On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Bill Berle wrote: --> Kolb-List message posted by: Bill Berle Anyway, with that off my chest, I'm waiting for my Firestar kit to arrive, and I can't wait to get started on it. Can anyone here tell me which is the best or best compromise choice for wheels brakes and tires, for my particular intended use? I will be building up this Firestar specifically as an off-airport, back country, extreme STOL aircraft to explore small landing areas. I want to do the hilltops, and small mountain meadows, and dirt trails, the small clearings, etc. So for this I need large tires and good brakes. Which combinations of wheels/brakes/tires have been successful on the Kolb aircraft for this type of mission? Bill -- The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant. If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 25, 2016
Subject: Re: another video
From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com>
http://www.jegs.com/p/JEGS-Performance-Products/JEGS-Wheel-Rim-to-Tire-Screw-Kit/756883/10002/-1 It was pointed out to me that you could get the screws cheaper than what I spent on these. YOu just need to have the right size drill bit because you want to cut some threads into the rim. I don't think you are going to have any problem with Alum rims cracking. The rim is aluminum, and the bead of the tire is big enough that the screws don't touch the tube. I did however use a washer between the screws and the rim to make sure. Almost all of the tundra tires are secured to the rim with screws. Firestar's do not have flaps or flaperons. I have been told that they don't need them. I don't know about alum leading edges and stuff, but the plane will perform better the lighter it is. Your decision of course. Disclaimer: I am not a "builder" as such. All and any advice is worth what you paid for it. Larry On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Bill Berle wrote: > > Larry how do you put screws into the tires without puncturing the inner > tube, or generating cracks in the rim? If I'm seeing your photo right, are > you flying your FS up there in NV someplace? Where are you based? > > I am planning on VG's (I know, I know... some people think they work and > others don't), and I am planning on an aluminum sheeted leading edge, and > some other STOL mods bouncing around in my head. > > Larry does your FS have flaperons, or separate flaps, or no flap features? > > I do have a little bit of training already, although it is not the formal > back country training like you can take classes in Idaho. I was once a > sailplane racer in the western US, and I've had my share of off-airport > landings in the gilders, in some really strange places (like the helicopter > pad at the USMC Mountain Warfare training facility in Bridgeport). I will > be starting off a little conservatively, especially since it will be a new > type of aircraft for me. > > Tell me about bracing the tailpost... braced in which direction, and > braced to what? > > Bill Berle > www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft > www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and > for-profit entities > > -------------------------------------------- > On Thu, 2/25/16, Larry Cottrell wrote: > > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: another video > To: "kolb-list(at)matronics.com" > Date: Thursday, February 25, 2016, 11:00 AM > > One of the tire > companies is now making "tundra tires" that will > fit on the 6 inch rims that most are using. There was a > recent (last 6 months) I think from Nick Cassara about them. > Fairly spendy however. I have 800 x 6 on my firestar with > the tires secured by screws so that I can run 6 lbs of air. > Other wise the tires spin when you land and shear off the > valve stems. I personally prefer individual brakes, and a > breakaway tail wheel. You will also need to brace the tail > post, so that it can withstand the pressures put on it by > the individual braking. > I have 6 inch mech brakes, and it seems to be > able to do the job for me. I got on them a bit hard last > year and it caused the plane to do little jumps as it was > bouncing the plane back up in the air. So I know that I get > all the braking that I need. I would prefer ?possibly? the > hydrallic ones but that requires buying two entire systems > to have individual. > You will of course need VG's, and for that I > would recommend JC Gilpin. > http://www.stolspeed.com/ > Then of course you will need the 36 inch long > tempered steel gear legs, making sure that you have the > heavy duty axle fittings. > I also recommend a Spot tracking unit, so that if > worse comes to worse they will know where to find > you. > That will give you the best possibility to > survive what you plan to do. The only other thing that you > will need is training, and some pretty big > cahones.Larry > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 > at 10:53 AM, Bill Berle > wrote: > --> > Kolb-List message posted by: Bill Berle > > > Anyway, with that off my chest, I'm waiting for my > Firestar kit to arrive, and I can't wait to get started > on it. Can anyone here tell me which is the best or best > compromise choice for wheels brakes and tires, for my > particular intended use? I will be building up this Firestar > specifically as an off-airport, back country, extreme STOL > aircraft to explore small landing areas. I want to do the > hilltops, and small mountain meadows, and dirt trails, the > small clearings, etc. So for this I need large tires and > good brakes. > > > Which combinations of wheels/brakes/tires have been > successful on the Kolb aircraft for this type of mission? > > > Bill > > > -- > The older I get, the less > tolerant I am of those who are > intolerant. > If you forward this email, or any part of > it, please remove my email address before sending. > > -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: another video
From: "Jason Omelchuck" <jason@trek-tech.com>
Date: Feb 26, 2016
These are the largest tires I could find for a 6" rim. There may be some that are larger in diameter but they are also much wider and width causes a lot of drag for little or no improvement on the ground. This tire comes in two versions. One with a full set of treads and one that is considerably lighter and has a lot of the rubber removed from the tread. http://www.desser.com/pc_combined_results.asp?pc_id=3F1FE0C9AD1D4CADBD51347914A186EF Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453223#453223 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 26, 2016
Subject: Bracing the tailwheel
From: B Young <byoungplumbing(at)gmail.com>
Without bracing the lower vertical stabilizer the side loads from the tail wheel will overstress the attachment of the lower vertical stabilizer where it attaches to the steel ring on the end of the tail boom. With that in mind if you could take some (some have used round tube,,, I used some 3/16. X 1 inch alum stock). Place it between the attach point of the lower vertical brace wires and just below center on the steel ring on the end of the tail boom. Use a small bolt in place of one of the rivets called for. Put one on each side. This will triangulate the lower vertical stabilizer against side load movement preventing breakage. Boyd Young Mkiii Utah ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 26, 2016
Subject: Re: another video
From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com>
These tires ( Buffed smooth) are actually about 4 pounds lighter than the 800 x6 that I currently have on my plane. They will also make your wallet a lot lighter as well. Larry On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Jason Omelchuck <jason@trek-tech.com> wrote: > > These are the largest tires I could find for a 6" rim. There may be some > that are larger in diameter but they are also much wider and width causes a > lot of drag for little or no improvement on the ground. This tire comes in > two versions. One with a full set of treads and one that is considerably > lighter and has a lot of the rubber removed from the tread. > > > http://www.desser.com/pc_combined_results.asp?pc_id=3F1FE0C9AD1D4CADBD51347914A186EF > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453223#453223 > > -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: another video
Date: Feb 26, 2016
I agree. Doubt I'd pay that much money for someone to wear the tread off my tire. I have run 8x6 air trac ribs for many, many hours and made many, many landings. Still have a lot of life left in them. I don't notice the weight. Have enough horses note to have to worry about a couple pounds here and there. I run 6 psi in mine without screws, but the MATCO rims grab much better than the rims Larry C is using. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Larry Cottrell Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 10:42 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: another video These tires ( Buffed smooth) are actually about 4 pounds lighter than the 800 x6 that I currently have on my plane. They will also make your wallet a lot lighter as well. Larry On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Jason Omelchuck <jason@trek-tech.com> wrote: These are the largest tires I could find for a 6" rim. There may be some that are larger in diameter but they are also much wider and width causes a lot of drag for little or no improvement on the ground. This tire comes in two versions. One with a full set of treads and one that is considerably lighter and has a lot of the rubber removed from the tread. http://www.desser.com/pc_combined_results.asp?pc_id=3F1FE0C9AD1D4CADBD5 1347914A186EF Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453223#453223 br> fts!) r> > w.buildersbooks.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution -Matt Dralle, List Admin. -List" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List FORUMS - eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com b Site - -Matt Dralle, List Admin. rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution -- The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant. If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 582 Radiator Advice
From: "tomb2b" <ferreeb2b(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 26, 2016
I would go with the twin rotax rads less wait they cool it the right way... Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453245#453245 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 582 Radiator Advice
From: "tomb2b" <ferreeb2b(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 26, 2016
I would go with the twin rotax rads less weight they cool it the right way... Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453246#453246 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 28, 2016
Subject: Hydraulic brakes?
From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com>
> > I am considering changing to a Hydraulic system for my Firestar ll. I have > looked at O'brian and Black Max so far. The only problem is that I want two > hand operation. ( individual braking) It appears that will run about $500 > bucks or more. Somehow I hate to do that, but still might depending on the > feed back I can get from those using hydraulic braking. BCC is fine - > lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com I only want to do this once, and I hate buyer > remorse. Larry -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stuart Harner" <stuart(at)harnerfarm.net>
Subject: Hydraulic brakes?
Date: Feb 28, 2016
Larry, I have the Black Max setup on my Firefly. Individual toe brakes though, not a hand brake. This included the wheels and tires and was purchased as an option when I bought the kit. Some people say you don=99t need brakes at all and especially not individual brakes on the Firefly. As a general rule I don=99t use them much. However, it is nice to be able to keep the engine RPM up and still taxi at a reasonable speed on pavement or not move at all. Occasionally I use them to help on a turn, although without a swiveling tail wheel like you have the effect is not as noticeable. I am not sure how you would rig the dual hand levers for individual brakes. One lever on the stick and one on the throttle? J Anyway, I have no regrets getting the Black Max setup. Easy to install and simple in design. Stuart From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Larry Cottrell Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 2:11 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Hydraulic brakes? I am considering changing to a Hydraulic system for my Firestar ll. I have looked at O'brian and Black Max so far. The only problem is that I want two hand operation. ( individual braking) It appears that will run about $500 bucks or more. Somehow I hate to do that, but still might depending on the feed back I can get from those using hydraulic braking. BCC is fine - lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com I only want to do this once, and I hate buyer remorse. Larry -- The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant. If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 28, 2016
Subject: Re: Hydraulic brakes?
From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com>
Thanks for the reply. After checking I may have to forego the dual hand brakes and stick with heel brakes. It would run about $550 for two separate systems. I am using mechanical heel brakes now, and may have to stick with that. If you have not already braced the tail post on you fly, you should really consider it. Thanks again, Larry On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stuart Harner wrote: > Larry, > > > I have the Black Max setup on my Firefly. Individual toe brakes though, > not a hand brake. This included the wheels and tires and was purchased as > an option when I bought the kit. > > > Some people say you don=99t need brakes at all and especially not i ndividual > brakes on the Firefly. As a general rule I don=99t use them much. However, > it is nice to be able to keep the engine RPM up and still taxi at a > reasonable speed on pavement or not move at all. > > > Occasionally I use them to help on a turn, although without a swiveling > tail wheel like you have the effect is not as noticeable. I am not sure h ow > you would rig the dual hand levers for individual brakes. One lever on th e > stick and one on the throttle? J > > > Anyway, I have no regrets getting the Black Max setup. Easy to install an d > simple in design. > > > Stuart > > > *From:* owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto: > owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Larry Cottrell > *Sent:* Sunday, February 28, 2016 2:11 PM > *To:* kolb-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* Kolb-List: Hydraulic brakes? > > > I am considering changing to a Hydraulic system for my Firestar ll. I hav e > looked at O'brian and Black Max so far. The only problem is that I want t wo > hand operation. ( individual braking) It appears that will run about $500 > bucks or more. Somehow I hate to do that, but still might depending on th e > feed back I can get from those using hydraulic braking. BCC is fine - > lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com I only want to do this once, and I hate buyer > remorse. > > > Larry > > > -- > > *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* > > > *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email > address before sending.* > -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Hydraulic brakes?
From: Herb <Herbgh(at)nctc.com>
Date: Feb 28, 2016
you can save most of that 550 dollars by using Mtn bike disc brakes...either hydraulic or mechanical...Gotta be a bit mechanically inclined...will need to make a couple of spools that attach the disc to the rim...and a couple of adapter plates that attach the caliper to the large washer that is welded to the axle... I found my mechanical versions at the salvage yard...for maybe 5 bucks.... Requires some design work...but was a good two day project... Ebay has both styles...Herb On 02/28/2016 06:11 PM, Larry Cottrell wrote: > Thanks for the reply. After checking I may have to forego the dual > hand brakes and stick with heel brakes. It would run about $550 for > two separate systems. I am using mechanical heel brakes now, and may > have to stick with that. > > If you have not already braced the tail post on you fly, you should > really consider it. > > Thanks again, > Larry > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stuart Harner > wrote: > > Larry, > > I have the Black Max setup on my Firefly. Individual toe brakes > though, not a hand brake. This included the wheels and tires and > was purchased as an option when I bought the kit. > > Some people say you dont need brakes at all and especially not > individual brakes on the Firefly. As a general rule I dont use > them much. However, it is nice to be able to keep the engine RPM > up and still taxi at a reasonable speed on pavement or not move at > all. > > Occasionally I use them to help on a turn, although without a > swiveling tail wheel like you have the effect is not as > noticeable. I am not sure how you would rig the dual hand levers > for individual brakes. One lever on the stick and one on the > throttle? J > > Anyway, I have no regrets getting the Black Max setup. Easy to > install and simple in design. > > Stuart > > *From:*owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com > > [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com > ] *On Behalf Of > *Larry Cottrell > *Sent:* Sunday, February 28, 2016 2:11 PM > *To:* kolb-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* Kolb-List: Hydraulic brakes? > > I am considering changing to a Hydraulic system for my > Firestar ll. I have looked at O'brian and Black Max so far. > The only problem is that I want two hand operation. ( > individual braking) It appears that will run about $500 bucks > or more. Somehow I hate to do that, but still might depending > on the feed back I can get from those using hydraulic braking. > BCC is fine - lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com > I only want to do this once, > and I hate buyer remorse. > > Larry > > -- > > /The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant./ > > /If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my > email address before sending./ > > > -- > /The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant./ > / > / > /If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email > address before sending./ -- Signature text; Fort Marcy Park? Sure...Mr. Foster...Third red light and turn left. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Hydraulic brakes?
From: "west1m" <west1m(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 28, 2016
I put the Black Max hydraulic brakes on my firefly. I use a dual hand control by the throttle. Quite handy, no regrets. -------- West1m Hastings, MN Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453278#453278 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 28, 2016
Subject: Re: Hydraulic brakes?
From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com>
Do you remember the cost for dual controls? Larry On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:59 PM, west1m wrote: > > I put the Black Max hydraulic brakes on my firefly. I use a dual hand > control by the throttle. Quite handy, no regrets. > > -------- > West1m > Hastings, MN > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453278#453278 > > -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stuart Harner" <stuart(at)harnerfarm.net>
Subject: Hydraulic brakes?
Date: Feb 28, 2016
Yeah, that is on my =9Cto do=9D list for this spring before flying season. I haven=99t settled on exactly how to do it yet. Also need to cut out all the inspection holes and have a real good look-see inside. About 15 hours in the air, I figure it is about time for a new bird. Many other =9Clittle details=9D to attend too as well. Weather is getting better every day Stuart From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Larry Cottrell Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 6:11 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Hydraulic brakes? Thanks for the reply. After checking I may have to forego the dual hand brakes and stick with heel brakes. It would run about $550 for two separate systems. I am using mechanical heel brakes now, and may have to stick with that. If you have not already braced the tail post on you fly, you should really consider it. Thanks again, Larry On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stuart Harner wrote: Larry, I have the Black Max setup on my Firefly. Individual toe brakes though, not a hand brake. This included the wheels and tires and was purchased as an option when I bought the kit. Some people say you don=99t need brakes at all and especially not individual brakes on the Firefly. As a general rule I don=99t use them much. However, it is nice to be able to keep the engine RPM up and still taxi at a reasonable speed on pavement or not move at all. Occasionally I use them to help on a turn, although without a swiveling tail wheel like you have the effect is not as noticeable. I am not sure how you would rig the dual hand levers for individual brakes. One lever on the stick and one on the throttle? J Anyway, I have no regrets getting the Black Max setup. Easy to install and simple in design. Stuart From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Larry Cottrell Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 2:11 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Hydraulic brakes? I am considering changing to a Hydraulic system for my Firestar ll. I have looked at O'brian and Black Max so far. The only problem is that I want two hand operation. ( individual braking) It appears that will run about $500 bucks or more. Somehow I hate to do that, but still might depending on the feed back I can get from those using hydraulic braking. BCC is fine - lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com I only want to do this once, and I hate buyer remorse. Larry -- The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant. If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending. -- The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant. If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Lee" <lmorgan100(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb-List Digest: 7 Msgs - 02/28/16
Date: Feb 29, 2016
Larry, I used hydraulic mountain bike brakes on my Twinstar MKII. I used 2 brake handles on the control stick and I can activate either side or both at the same time with just my fingers. The cost was about $100. total. They hold really well, I can power it up until it noses over. I did have to make all the mounting hardware and it has to be accurate so it doesn't rub. I have never used toe brakes and thought I would have a problem because I operate out of a rough field and could picture my feet bouncing on and off the brakes at just the wrong time. Lee Today's Message Index: ---------------------- 1. 12:11 PM - Hydraulic brakes? (Larry Cottrell) 2. 03:33 PM - Re: Hydraulic brakes? (Stuart Harner) 3. 04:11 PM - Re: Hydraulic brakes? (Larry Cottrell) 4. 05:32 PM - Re: Hydraulic brakes? (Herb) 5. 08:00 PM - Re: Hydraulic brakes? (west1m) 6. 08:06 PM - Re: Re: Hydraulic brakes? (Larry Cottrell) 7. 08:34 PM - Re: Hydraulic brakes? (Stuart Harner) ________________________________ Message 1 _____________________________________ Subject: Kolb-List: Hydraulic brakes? From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com> > > I am considering changing to a Hydraulic system for my Firestar ll. I have > looked at O'brian and Black Max so far. The only problem is that I want > two > hand operation. ( individual braking) It appears that will run about $500 > bucks or more. Somehow I hate to do that, but still might depending on the > feed back I can get from those using hydraulic braking. BCC is fine - > lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com I only want to do this once, and I hate buyer > remorse. Larry -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________ Message 2 _____________________________________ From: "Stuart Harner" <stuart(at)harnerfarm.net> Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Hydraulic brakes? Larry, I have the Black Max setup on my Firefly. Individual toe brakes though, not a hand brake. This included the wheels and tires and was purchased as an option when I bought the kit. Some people say you don=99t need brakes at all and especially not individual brakes on the Firefly. As a general rule I don=99t use them much. However, it is nice to be able to keep the engine RPM up and still taxi at a reasonable speed on pavement or not move at all. Occasionally I use them to help on a turn, although without a swiveling tail wheel like you have the effect is not as noticeable. I am not sure how you would rig the dual hand levers for individual brakes. One lever on the stick and one on the throttle? J Anyway, I have no regrets getting the Black Max setup. Easy to install and simple in design. Stuart From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Larry Cottrell Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 2:11 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Hydraulic brakes? I am considering changing to a Hydraulic system for my Firestar ll. I have looked at O'brian and Black Max so far. The only problem is that I want two hand operation. ( individual braking) It appears that will run about $500 bucks or more. Somehow I hate to do that, but still might depending on the feed back I can get from those using hydraulic braking. BCC is fine - lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com I only want to do this once, and I hate buyer remorse. Larry -- The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant. If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending. ________________________________ Message 3 _____________________________________ Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Hydraulic brakes? From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com> Thanks for the reply. After checking I may have to forego the dual hand brakes and stick with heel brakes. It would run about $550 for two separate systems. I am using mechanical heel brakes now, and may have to stick with that. If you have not already braced the tail post on you fly, you should really consider it. Thanks again, Larry On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stuart Harner wrote: > Larry, > > > I have the Black Max setup on my Firefly. Individual toe brakes though, > not a hand brake. This included the wheels and tires and was purchased as > an option when I bought the kit. > > > Some people say you don=99t need brakes at all and especially not i ndividual > brakes on the Firefly. As a general rule I don=99t use them much. However, > it is nice to be able to keep the engine RPM up and still taxi at a > reasonable speed on pavement or not move at all. > > > Occasionally I use them to help on a turn, although without a swiveling > tail wheel like you have the effect is not as noticeable. I am not sure h ow > you would rig the dual hand levers for individual brakes. One lever on th e > stick and one on the throttle? J > > > Anyway, I have no regrets getting the Black Max setup. Easy to install an d > simple in design. > > > Stuart > > > *From:* owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto: > owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Larry Cottrell > *Sent:* Sunday, February 28, 2016 2:11 PM > *To:* kolb-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* Kolb-List: Hydraulic brakes? > > > I am considering changing to a Hydraulic system for my Firestar ll. I hav e > looked at O'brian and Black Max so far. The only problem is that I want t wo > hand operation. ( individual braking) It appears that will run about $500 > bucks or more. Somehow I hate to do that, but still might depending on th e > feed back I can get from those using hydraulic braking. BCC is fine - > lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com I only want to do this once, and I hate buyer > remorse. > > > Larry > > > -- > > *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* > > > *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email > address before sending.* > -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________ Message 4 _____________________________________ Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Hydraulic brakes? From: Herb <Herbgh(at)nctc.com> you can save most of that 550 dollars by using Mtn bike disc brakes...either hydraulic or mechanical...Gotta be a bit mechanically inclined...will need to make a couple of spools that attach the disc to the rim...and a couple of adapter plates that attach the caliper to the large washer that is welded to the axle... I found my mechanical versions at the salvage yard...for maybe 5 bucks.... Requires some design work...but was a good two day project... Ebay has both styles...Herb On 02/28/2016 06:11 PM, Larry Cottrell wrote: > Thanks for the reply. After checking I may have to forego the dual > hand brakes and stick with heel brakes. It would run about $550 for > two separate systems. I am using mechanical heel brakes now, and may > have to stick with that. > > If you have not already braced the tail post on you fly, you should > really consider it. > > Thanks again, > Larry > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stuart Harner > wrote: > > Larry, > > I have the Black Max setup on my Firefly. Individual toe brakes > though, not a hand brake. This included the wheels and tires and > was purchased as an option when I bought the kit. > > Some people say you dont need brakes at all and especially not > individual brakes on the Firefly. As a general rule I dont use > them much. However, it is nice to be able to keep the engine RPM > up and still taxi at a reasonable speed on pavement or not move at > all. > > Occasionally I use them to help on a turn, although without a > swiveling tail wheel like you have the effect is not as > noticeable. I am not sure how you would rig the dual hand levers > for individual brakes. One lever on the stick and one on the > throttle? J > > Anyway, I have no regrets getting the Black Max setup. Easy to > install and simple in design. > > Stuart > > *From:*owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com > > [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com > ] *On Behalf Of > *Larry Cottrell > *Sent:* Sunday, February 28, 2016 2:11 PM > *To:* kolb-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* Kolb-List: Hydraulic brakes? > > I am considering changing to a Hydraulic system for my > Firestar ll. I have looked at O'brian and Black Max so far. > The only problem is that I want two hand operation. ( > individual braking) It appears that will run about $500 bucks > or more. Somehow I hate to do that, but still might depending > on the feed back I can get from those using hydraulic braking. > BCC is fine - lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com > I only want to do this once, > and I hate buyer remorse. > > Larry > > -- > > /The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant./ > > /If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my > email address before sending./ > > > -- > /The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant./ > / > / > /If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email > address before sending./ -- Signature text; Fort Marcy Park? Sure...Mr. Foster...Third red light and turn left. ________________________________ Message 5 _____________________________________ Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Hydraulic brakes? From: "west1m" <west1m(at)hotmail.com> I put the Black Max hydraulic brakes on my firefly. I use a dual hand control by the throttle. Quite handy, no regrets. -------- West1m Hastings, MN Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453278#453278 ________________________________ Message 6 _____________________________________ Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Hydraulic brakes? From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com> Do you remember the cost for dual controls? Larry On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:59 PM, west1m wrote: > > I put the Black Max hydraulic brakes on my firefly. I use a dual hand > control by the throttle. Quite handy, no regrets. > > -------- > West1m > Hastings, MN > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453278#453278 > > -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________ Message 7 _____________________________________ From: "Stuart Harner" <stuart(at)harnerfarm.net> Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Hydraulic brakes? Yeah, that is on my =9Cto do=9D list for this spring before flying season. I haven=99t settled on exactly how to do it yet. Also need to cut out all the inspection holes and have a real good look-see inside. About 15 hours in the air, I figure it is about time for a new bird. Many other =9Clittle details=9D to attend too as well. Weather is getting better every day Stuart From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Larry Cottrell Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 6:11 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Hydraulic brakes? Thanks for the reply. After checking I may have to forego the dual hand brakes and stick with heel brakes. It would run about $550 for two separate systems. I am using mechanical heel brakes now, and may have to stick with that. If you have not already braced the tail post on you fly, you should really consider it. Thanks again, Larry On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stuart Harner wrote: Larry, I have the Black Max setup on my Firefly. Individual toe brakes though, not a hand brake. This included the wheels and tires and was purchased as an option when I bought the kit. Some people say you don=99t need brakes at all and especially not individual brakes on the Firefly. As a general rule I don=99t use them much. However, it is nice to be able to keep the engine RPM up and still taxi at a reasonable speed on pavement or not move at all. Occasionally I use them to help on a turn, although without a swiveling tail wheel like you have the effect is not as noticeable. I am not sure how you would rig the dual hand levers for individual brakes. One lever on the stick and one on the throttle? J Anyway, I have no regrets getting the Black Max setup. Easy to install and simple in design. Stuart From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Larry Cottrell Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 2:11 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Hydraulic brakes? I am considering changing to a Hydraulic system for my Firestar ll. I have looked at O'brian and Black Max so far. The only problem is that I want two hand operation. ( individual braking) It appears that will run about $500 bucks or more. Somehow I hate to do that, but still might depending on the feed back I can get from those using hydraulic braking. BCC is fine - lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com I only want to do this once, and I hate buyer remorse. Larry -- The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant. If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending. -- The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant. If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Hydraulic brakes?
From: "west1m" <west1m(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 29, 2016
I don't recall the cost, they came from Black Max. Expensive but I wanted brakes flying off the blacktop all the time. lcottrell wrote: > Do you remember the cost for dual controls?Larry > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:59 PM, west1m wrote: > > > > > I put the Black Max hydraulic brakes on my firefly. I use a dual hand control by the throttle. Quite handy, no regrets. > > > > -------- > > West1m > > Hastings, MN > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453278#453278 (http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453278#453278) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ========== > > br> fts!) > > r> > w.buildersbooks.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com > > rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > -Matt Dralle, List Admin. > > ========== > > -List" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List > > ========== > > FORUMS - > > eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com > > ========== > > b Site - > > -Matt Dralle, List Admin. > > rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > ========== > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant. > > > If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending. -------- West1m Hastings, MN Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453285#453285 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Hydraulic brakes?
From: "Thumper" <dlong1957(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Feb 29, 2016
Larry Try these for dual hydraulic hand brake actuators. I did something similar on my old Firestar with the levers just in front of the seat between my legs. I used Mt Bike brakes but this would work. This is similar to what we had on a drifter in my hangar at one time and it worked excellent. And lots less than 500. Maybe buy the throttle like the one picture as part of this subject. Shop around for the best price on 5" or 7" levers. Hagar is the brand. Good Luck and I'll get out that way sometime. https://www.cps-parts.com/categories/aircraft_parts/ap/menus/lg/masterbrakecylinders_hegar.html -------- Dennis Long Oakland TN 2000 Aeroprakt A20 Vista Cruiser Previously Kolb Mark IIIC, 94 Firestar, 84 Ultrastar. 700+hours since 1/1/2009 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453286#453286 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/hagar_dual_master_cylinder_221.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 29, 2016
Subject: Re: 582 Radiator Advice
From: Richard Girard <aslsa.rng(at)gmail.com>
The twin radiator set up is designed for a tractor installation. They don't work worth a damn on a pusher like the Kolb. On top of that they're meant for a "C" gearbox mount AND Rotax wants over $800 for the complete kit. There's a better way. Somewhere in the archives is my report on a radiator that does work. It's off a Honda Magna motorcycle, has the fittings in the right location and can be had for anywhere from $25 to $200 so do your shopping on eBay. How well does it work? I took off on a July afternoon when the thermometer read 117 and climbed direct to 6,000 ft. Needle on the coolant temp meter never came out of the green on a three and a half hour flight. I almost boiled over but the engine never came close. Rick Girard PS You'll notice that there's two different systems pictured. Worked perfectly both times. On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:43 PM, tomb2b wrote: > > I would go with the twin rotax rads less wait they cool it the right way. .. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453245#453245 > > =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== > > -- =9CBlessed are the cracked, for they shall let in the light.=9D Groucho Marx <http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/43244.Groucho_Marx> ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: 582 Radiator Advice
Date: Feb 29, 2016
Rick G/Kolbers: Only problem I had with my twin radiator set up on my 582 powered MKIII was the price. Worked fine for me the short 224 hours I flew that engine. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Richard Girard Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:56 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: 582 Radiator Advice The twin radiator set up is designed for a tractor installation. They don't work worth a damn on a pusher like the Kolb. On top of that they're meant for a "C" gearbox mount AND Rotax wants over $800 for the complete kit. There's a better way. Somewhere in the archives is my report on a radiator that does work. It's off a Honda Magna motorcycle, has the fittings in the right location and can be had for anywhere from $25 to $200 so do your shopping on eBay. How well does it work? I took off on a July afternoon when the thermometer read 117 and climbed direct to 6,000 ft. Needle on the coolant temp meter never came out of the green on a three and a half hour flight. I almost boiled over but the engine never came close. Rick Girard PS You'll notice that there's two different systems pictured. Worked perfectly both times. On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:43 PM, tomb2b wrote: I would go with the twin rotax rads less wait they cool it the right way... Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453245#453245 br> fts!) r> > w.buildersbooks.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution -Matt Dralle, List Admin. -List" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List FORUMS - eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com b Site - -Matt Dralle, List Admin. rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution -- =9CBlessed are the cracked, for they shall let in the light.=9D <http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/43244.Groucho_Marx> Groucho Marx ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 29, 2016
From: Bill Berle <victorbravo(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Hydraulic brakes?
If your feet could bounce off the pedals in a rough field, then make a little loop out of nylon webbing (from a broken ratchet strap or something) and tie it to the pedal. Put your foot into this loop and use it like a stirrup. Adjust the size and location of the loop so that it only goes around your toes, so it cannot trip you getting out of the cockpit. Tie it to the pedal system in a location that allows you to move your foot to activate the brakes. Problem solved, cost zero. Bill Berle www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and for-profit entities -------------------------------------------- On Mon, 2/29/16, west1m wrote: Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Hydraulic brakes? To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Date: Monday, February 29, 2016, 6:49 AM "west1m" I don't recall the cost, they came from Black Max. Expensive but I wanted brakes flying off the blacktop all the time. lcottrell wrote: > Do you remember the cost for dual controls?Larry > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:59 PM, west1m wrote: > > > > > I put the Black Max hydraulic brakes on my firefly. I use a dual hand control by the throttle. Quite handy, no regrets. > > > > -------- > > West1m > > Hastings, MN > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453278#453278 (http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453278#453278) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ========== > > br> fts!) > > r> > w.buildersbooks.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com > > rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > -Matt Dralle, List Admin. > > ========== > > -List" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List > > ========== > >FORUMS - > > eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com > > ========== > > b Site - > > -Matt Dralle, List Admin. > > rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > ========== > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant. > > > If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending. -------- West1m Hastings, MN Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453285#453285 Lists This Month -- Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!) Raiser. Click on more about Gifts provided www.buildersbooks.com -Matt Dralle, List Admin. Forum - - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - List Contribution Web Site - -Matt Dralle, List Admin. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Hydraulic brakes?
From: Gary Aman <zeprep251(at)aol.com>
Date: Feb 29, 2016
If it's that rough your tires aren't on the ground either. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 29, 2016, at 12:45 PM, Bill Berle wrote: > > > If your feet could bounce off the pedals in a rough field, then make a little loop out of nylon webbing (from a broken ratchet strap or something) and tie it to the pedal. Put your foot into this loop and use it like a stirrup. Adjust the size and location of the loop so that it only goes around your toes, so it cannot trip you getting out of the cockpit. Tie it to the pedal system in a location that allows you to move your foot to activate the brakes. > > Problem solved, cost zero. > > > Bill Berle > www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft > www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and for-profit entities > > -------------------------------------------- > On Mon, 2/29/16, west1m wrote: > > Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Hydraulic brakes? > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Monday, February 29, 2016, 6:49 AM > > "west1m" > > I don't recall the cost, they came from Black Max. > Expensive but I wanted brakes flying off the blacktop all > the time. > > > > lcottrell wrote: >> Do you remember the cost for dual controls?Larry >> >> >>> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:59 PM, west1m wrote: >>> >>> >>> I put the Black Max hydraulic brakes on my > firefly. I use a dual hand control by the throttle. Quite > handy, no regrets. >>> >>> -------- >>> West1m >>> Hastings, MN >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Read this topic online here: >>> >>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453278#453278 > (http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453278#453278) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ========== >>> br> fts!) >>> r> > w.buildersbooks.com" > rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com >>> rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >>> -Matt Dralle, List > Admin. >>> ========== >>> -List" rel="noreferrer" > target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List >>> ========== >>> FORUMS - >>> eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com >>> ========== >>> b Site - >>> -Matt Dralle, List > Admin. >>> rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >>> ========== >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who > are intolerant. >> >> >> If you forward this email, or any part of it, please > remove my email address before sending. > > > -------- > West1m > Hastings, MN > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453285#453285 > > > > > > > > Lists This Month -- > Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!) > Raiser. Click on > more about > Gifts provided > www.buildersbooks.com > -Matt > Dralle, List Admin. > Forum - > - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - > List Contribution Web Site - > -Matt > Dralle, List Admin. > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "George Bearden" <gab16(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Hydraulic brakes?
Date: Mar 01, 2016
> I used 2 brake handles on the control stick and I can activate either side or both at the same time with just my fingers. Thanks for your post and idea! I have been wondering if I should use separate levers on my conversion. I have mtn bike disc brakes mounted, but the caliper mounts are not done. I was thinking about putting one brake lever on the left of the seat and one on the stick. But as I read your post I visualized both on the stick, maybe reversed so the handle ends are adjacent to each other. Dunno, maybe it would work. How are yours mounted? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 01, 2016
Subject: Re: Hydraulic brakes?
From: Rick Neilsen <neilsenrm(at)gmail.com>
I can't imagine having to worry about my feet bouncing off the rudder pedals or brakes. I like heal brake pedals because they don't stress the rudder cables and you aren't near as likely to inadvertently apply the brakes. Hand brakes???? I have Matco brakes I like the design but mine are a bit low on braking power. Kolb's old demonstrator, Fat Albert had Matco brakes and it had four times the braking power. I had to be very careful using them because I'm so used to standing on mine. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Bill Berle wrote: > > If your feet could bounce off the pedals in a rough field, then make a > little loop out of nylon webbing (from a broken ratchet strap or something) > and tie it to the pedal. Put your foot into this loop and use it like a > stirrup. Adjust the size and location of the loop so that it only goes > around your toes, so it cannot trip you getting out of the cockpit. Tie it > to the pedal system in a location that allows you to move your foot to > activate the brakes. > > Problem solved, cost zero. > > > Bill Berle > www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft > www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and > for-profit entities > > -------------------------------------------- > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 01, 2016
Subject: Re: Hydraulic brakes?
From: B Young <byoungplumbing(at)gmail.com>
Rick do you know why fat Albert's brakes were so much better? did it have the 2 puck calipers. or a better mechanical advantage? Boyd On Mar 1, 2016 1:24 PM, "Rick Neilsen" wrote: > I can't imagine having to worry about my feet bouncing off the rudder > pedals or brakes. I like heal brake pedals because they don't stress the > rudder cables and you aren't near as likely to inadvertently apply the > brakes. Hand brakes???? > > I have Matco brakes I like the design but mine are a bit low on braking > power. Kolb's old demonstrator, Fat Albert had Matco brakes and it had four > times the braking power. I had to be very careful using them because I'm so > used to standing on mine. > > Rick Neilsen > Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Bill Berle > wrote: > >> >> If your feet could bounce off the pedals in a rough field, then make a >> little loop out of nylon webbing (from a broken ratchet strap or something) >> and tie it to the pedal. Put your foot into this loop and use it like a >> stirrup. Adjust the size and location of the loop so that it only goes >> around your toes, so it cannot trip you getting out of the cockpit. Tie it >> to the pedal system in a location that allows you to move your foot to >> activate the brakes. >> >> Problem solved, cost zero. >> >> >> Bill Berle >> www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft >> www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and >> for-profit entities >> >> -------------------------------------------- >> >> >> ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 01, 2016
Subject: Re: Hydraulic brakes?
From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com>
Using my mech brakes I came up with this and it worked very well. I found it much easier to control my plane with these and using the rudders. They at least were always positive, where as I find it difficult sometimes to get my feet where I want them and use the rudders as well. Perhaps I am just clumsy! I had to do a bit of welding, but it worked just fine. On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:33 AM, George Bearden wrote: > > > I used 2 brake handles on the control stick and I can activate either > side or both at the same time with just my fingers. > > Thanks for your post and idea! I have been wondering if I should use > separate levers on my conversion. I have mtn bike disc brakes mounted, but > the caliper mounts are not done. > > I was thinking about putting one brake lever on the left of the seat and > one on the stick. But as I read your post I visualized both on the stick, > maybe reversed so the handle ends are adjacent to each other. Dunno, maybe > it would work. How are yours mounted? > > -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Hydraulic brakes?
From: "Richard Pike" <thegreybaron(at)charter.net>
Date: Mar 01, 2016
Looks like their are all sorts of ways to skin this cat. Here is how we did it in the FSII: instead of pulling back you push down. (Did it this way because it was easier to weld in the brackets and make everything fit. Bleeding the air out is a pain tho...) http://oh2fly.net/oldpoops/Panel.htm -------- Richard Pike Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Kingsport, TN 3TN0 Would you consider yourself to be a good person? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWcDXT6pH7A Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453350#453350 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Patrick Ladd <patrickjladd(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Hydraulic brakes?
Date: Mar 02, 2016
=9Cfeet bouncing off the rudder pedals or brakes. I like heal brake pedals..=9D I remember the CFI at my Gliding Club pulling the horn off the rudder of a glider which had heel operated rudder pedals through a rough landing run. The forces involved in a rough run are considerable. I flew with a plaster cast on and punched a hole in the cockpit floor through banging up and down on a rough take off run. Pat From: Rick Neilsen Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 5:10 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Hydraulic brakes? I can't imagine having to worry about my feet bouncing off the rudder pedals or brakes. I like heal brake pedals because they don't stress the rudder cables and you aren't near as likely to inadvertently apply the brakes. Hand brakes???? I have Matco brakes I like the design but mine are a bit low on braking power. Kolb's old demonstrator, Fat Albert had Matco brakes and it had four times the braking power. I had to be very careful using them because I'm so used to standing on mine. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Bill Berle wrote: If your feet could bounce off the pedals in a rough field, then make a little loop out of nylon webbing (from a broken ratchet strap or something) and tie it to the pedal. Put your foot into this loop and use it like a stirrup. Adjust the size and location of the loop so that it only goes around your toes, so it cannot trip you getting out of the cockpit. Tie it to the pedal system in a location that allows you to move your foot to activate the brakes. Problem solved, cost zero. Bill Berle www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and for-profit entities -------------------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 02, 2016
Subject: Re: Hydraulic brakes?
From: Rick Neilsen <neilsenrm(at)gmail.com>
Pat We are talking about Kolb airplanes. Also not recommended that one is on the brake peddles until after landing. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Patrick Ladd wrote: > =9Cfeet bouncing off the rudder pedals or brakes. I like heal brake pedals..=9D > > I remember the CFI at my Gliding Club pulling the horn off the rudder of a > glider which had heel operated rudder pedals through a rough landing run. > The forces involved in a rough run are considerable. I flew with a plaste r > cast on and punched a hole in the cockpit floor through banging up and do wn > on a rough take off run. > > Pat > > *From:* Rick Neilsen > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 1, 2016 5:10 PM > *To:* kolb-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* Re: Kolb-List: Re: Hydraulic brakes? > > I can't imagine having to worry about my feet bouncing off the rudder > pedals or brakes. I like heal brake pedals because they don't stress the > rudder cables and you aren't near as likely to inadvertently apply the > brakes. Hand brakes???? > > I have Matco brakes I like the design but mine are a bit low on braking > power. Kolb's old demonstrator, Fat Albert had Matco brakes and it had fo ur > times the braking power. I had to be very careful using them because I'm so > used to standing on mine. > > Rick Neilsen > Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Bill Berle > wrote: > >> >> If your feet could bounce off the pedals in a rough field, then make a >> little loop out of nylon webbing (from a broken ratchet strap or somethi ng) >> and tie it to the pedal. Put your foot into this loop and use it like a >> stirrup. Adjust the size and location of the loop so that it only goes >> around your toes, so it cannot trip you getting out of the cockpit. Tie it >> to the pedal system in a location that allows you to move your foot to >> activate the brakes. >> >> Problem solved, cost zero. >> >> >> Bill Berle >> www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft >> www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and >> for-profit entities >> >> -------------------------------------------- >> >> >> ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 02, 2016
Subject: Re: Hydraulic brakes?
From: Rick Neilsen <neilsenrm(at)gmail.com>
Boyd I have asked myself that question many times. No I don't think it had the it had the 2 puck calipers or more mechanical advantage. I think the brake disk is a different material, mine don't rust (likely stainless) or the brake pads are less abrasive.??????? Rick Neilsen Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 3:49 PM, B Young wrote: > Rick > do you know why fat Albert's brakes were so much better? did it have > the 2 puck calipers. or a better mechanical advantage? > Boyd > On Mar 1, 2016 1:24 PM, "Rick Neilsen" wrote: > >> I can't imagine having to worry about my feet bouncing off the rudder >> pedals or brakes. I like heal brake pedals because they don't stress the >> rudder cables and you aren't near as likely to inadvertently apply the >> brakes. Hand brakes???? >> >> I have Matco brakes I like the design but mine are a bit low on braking >> power. Kolb's old demonstrator, Fat Albert had Matco brakes and it had four >> times the braking power. I had to be very careful using them because I'm so >> used to standing on mine. >> >> Rick Neilsen >> Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC >> >> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Bill Berle >> wrote: >> >>> >>> If your feet could bounce off the pedals in a rough field, then make a >>> little loop out of nylon webbing (from a broken ratchet strap or something) >>> and tie it to the pedal. Put your foot into this loop and use it like a >>> stirrup. Adjust the size and location of the loop so that it only goes >>> around your toes, so it cannot trip you getting out of the cockpit. Tie it >>> to the pedal system in a location that allows you to move your foot to >>> activate the brakes. >>> >>> Problem solved, cost zero. >>> >>> >>> Bill Berle >>> www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft >>> www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and >>> for-profit entities >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Rotax 503 - 300 Hour Rebuild - Advice
From: "miyer2u" <miyer2u(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Mar 02, 2016
Hello Kolbers, I have 280 HRS on my 503. I decarbed it, checked the crank, Cleant the piston grooves, rings, dome, put new gaskets and assembled it back. Test ran and alls well. I DID NOT change the needle bearings and wanted to know if thats an issue. I have heard the needle bearings can break in the 300 hour range? is that true? Should I go ahead and replace them? Any experience that you could share? Thanks much! Mahesh FS-2 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453365#453365 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 582 Radiator Advice
From: "tomb2b" <ferreeb2b(at)gmail.com>
Date: Mar 02, 2016
I have ran the twin for 20 years that system is designed for the water cooled engines some after market designed you can get a shock cool down you do not get the hours out of it I just bought a good used complete set on barnstormers 400 bucks for my kolb m3 fixer upper it had that big heavy rad mounted on it first thing I removed... just advice Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453366#453366 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: 582 Radiator Advice
Date: Mar 02, 2016
I believe cold seizures are the result of improper thermostat set up, not radiators. The thermostat must have a bleed hole of a specific diameter that I cannot remember at this time. Smaller or no bleed hole at all with cause cold seizures when the thermostat opens and dumps cold water from the radiator into the cylinder and head. I learned this the hard way in 1993, on my first MKIII engine, a 582 with 224.0 hours on it. My engine came without a thermostat and I thought it would operate better with one. Bought the thermostat from Rotax, but it did not have a bleed hole, or it had a very tiny one. Been too long ago. Cannot remember. john h mkIII 912ULS with not thermostat Titus, Alabama -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of tomb2b Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 4:06 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: 582 Radiator Advice I have ran the twin for 20 years that system is designed for the water cooled engines some after market designed you can get a shock cool down you do not get the hours out of it I just bought a good used complete set on barnstormers 400 bucks for my kolb m3 fixer upper it had that big heavy rad mounted on it first thing I removed... just advice Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453366#453366 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Hydraulic brakes?
From: "Thumper" <dlong1957(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Mar 03, 2016
Here is my MT bike brake handles for my Firestar I that I installed before selling. Pull one or the other, or the cable loop for both. worked good for me. -------- Dennis Long Oakland TN 2000 Aeroprakt A20 Vista Cruiser, 2016 A22LS Aeroprakt Previously Kolb Mark IIIC, 94 Firestar, 84 Ultrastar. 1200+hours since 1/1/2009 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453390#453390 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/100_3394_901.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/100_3393_316.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Hydraulic brakes?
From: "Richard Pike" <thegreybaron(at)charter.net>
Date: Mar 04, 2016
Wow...the term "photo bombed" just took on a new meaning for this thread... https://imageresizer.codeplex.com/ -------- Richard Pike Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Kingsport, TN 3TN0 Would you consider yourself to be a good person? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWcDXT6pH7A Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453414#453414 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 04, 2016
Subject: Re: Hydraulic brakes?
From: Charlie England <ceengland7(at)gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Richard Pike wrote: > > Wow...the term "photo bombed" just took on a new meaning for this thread... > https://imageresizer.codeplex.com/ > > -------- > Richard Pike > Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > Kingsport, TN 3TN0 > > Thanks for the link. Previous versions I tried for win7 didn't seem to > work; this one does. AVG scan says 'no threats found'. Charlie ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Hydraulic brakes?
From: "Richard Pike" <thegreybaron(at)charter.net>
Date: Mar 04, 2016
williamtsullivan(at)att.n wrote: > Richard- Can that photo tool be used with Windows 10? Is it from a trusted source? Free? > I've been using it with no problems, it's free, it works, it uses a Microsoft Public License, I have had no issues with it. If you browse the website it looks pretty legit. That's all I know. https://imageresizer.codeplex.com/ -------- Richard Pike Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Kingsport, TN 3TN0 Would you consider yourself to be a good person? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWcDXT6pH7A Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453432#453432 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Hydraulic brakes?
From: "Rex Rodebush" <jrrodebush(at)gmail.com>
Date: Mar 05, 2016
If your picture is on Picasa and you export it will give you the option to resize it. Then go the export file where you sent it and attach it to your post. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453441#453441 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Extending instrument panel
From: "Mcabbage" <Mc(at)americanbuilding.com>
Date: Mar 05, 2016
I would like to extend my fs2 Inst. panel I have seen a few have done it and was hoping to get a little guidance and or pictures of the process. I was thinking to hinge it for better access. How far to extend What materials how to fabricate it How to hinge and how to secure to existing panel? I found these pics on barnstormers and really like the layout. Thanks for any help Mike -------- 2007 Firestar 2 503 N203SD Moster 185 flattop PPG/Sky K2 Paraglider Trike Buggy Soaring Trike & Northwing Stratus XP Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453445#453445 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/watermarked_0fc82c0fa7d617e1abc793e11a6e1fa1_142.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/watermarked_84269d8fe77ecb1283f59dc7b15d37f6_200.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Extending instrument panel
Date: Mar 05, 2016
Do a Google search of the N number. It will produce the first, second, and third owners of this FS. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mcabbage Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2016 4:11 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Extending instrument panel I would like to extend my fs2 Inst. panel I have seen a few have done it and was hoping to get a little guidance and or pictures of the process. I was thinking to hinge it for better access. How far to extend What materials how to fabricate it How to hinge and how to secure to existing panel? I found these pics on barnstormers and really like the layout. Thanks for any help Mike -------- 2007 Firestar 2 503 N203SD Moster 185 flattop PPG/Sky K2 Paraglider Trike Buggy Soaring Trike & Northwing Stratus XP Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453445#453445 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/watermarked_0fc82c0fa7d617e1abc793e11a6e1 fa1_142.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/watermarked_84269d8fe77ecb1283f59dc7b15d3 7f6_200.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Rotax 503 - 300 Hour Rebuild - Advice
From: "Richard Pike" <thegreybaron(at)charter.net>
Date: Mar 05, 2016
I think no one wants to reply because no one wants to give you bad advice. I currently have 270 hours on my 582, and plan to run it to 450 hours. Given my age, and the number of hours I fly each year, that will probably be sufficient for my aviating future. BUT I consistently try and run it at 5,400 rpm, which keeps the centrifugal load on the crank bearings down, and should extend the crank life. Should. Hmm.. I guess in a another few years I'll find out if that was a good idea. -------- Richard Pike Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Kingsport, TN 3TN0 Would you consider yourself to be a good person? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWcDXT6pH7A Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453450#453450 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 06, 2016
From: Jim Baker <jimbaker(at)npacc.net>
Subject: Re: Rotax 503 - 300 Hour Rebuild - Advice
Richard brings up a point that drove me to acquiring a Hirth, specifically the old 2704. Max rpm for that model is 5400. I normally fly at 3500 to 3900 rpm, depending on the day and the resultant EGT. Combine that with 624 CC and you get a powerplant that creates its max torque well down the Rev range and is creating much less heat in the cylinder per unit time than the higher revving two stroke. I, however, run two strokes much differently than others would. The most common ailment heard is burned oil creating coke on the piston crown, ring lands (especially Dykes type, which is the type Rotax uses) and exhaust ports. The oil in the ring lands is cooked and leaves behind the carbon residue from that cooking. Same for crowns and ports. EGT is, I believe, my key. I don't run an RPM or an airspeed, simply an EGT that is sufficiently high to more completely burn the fuel mixed with the oil. Generally that's in the 1150 to 1200 range. I'll often read an article up to the point that the "expert" says no one should run below 32 or 20:1 ratios. There goes the credibility. On top of that, more oil is not better. Too much oil will cause roller bearing balls to hydrodynamically skid instead of roll. The amount of lubrication a quality ball bearing or needle bearing needs is vanishingly small. Consider a wheel bearing....packed with grease, initially, after awhile the grease retreats from contact with the balls and ony sporadically comes in contact, usually from some high G load such as a pothole. Re-pack a really old bearing and watch what comes out...congealed chunks of lubicant. The wrist pin needle bearings are the more susceptible to heat damage from lack of lubrication. So. I run 100:1 oil mix. Doesn't matter which one, I'm not pushing a brand. The less oil there is, the less there is to leave carbon behind. It's a fine balancing act to not use too little that the bearings complain. I think I get away with it because my larger piston surface area more readily sheds heat via cylinder wall contact, less heat per unit time, and the cooling of the underside of the piston by the incoming charge, the oil doesn't have a chance to coke and leave deposits behind. That, and the fact that I don't have a Dykes top ring. Dykes are great at more complete cylinder sealing because of the larger ring/cylinder wall contact area but it also makes them hotter because of that contact. After 600 hours, no decarbon needed. Plugs have been replaced once, more from curiosity than anything else. They looked just like four stroke plugs, just a light tan and no coking up into the insulator well. Maybe I'm spouting crap. My Gordon Jennings handbook, the SAE papers I've read have confirmed, at least in my mind, what I've just posted....but as I said, may be crap. Or not. Jim Baker 405 426 5377 -----Original Message----- From: Richard Pike <thegreybaron(at)charter.net> Sent: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 22:48 Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Rotax 503 - 300 Hour Rebuild - Advice I think no one wants to reply because no one wants to give you bad advice. I currently have 270 hours on my 582, and plan to run it to 450 hours. Given my age, and the number of hours I fly each year, that will probably be sufficient for my aviating future. BUT I consistently try and run it at 5,400 rpm, which keeps the centrifugal load on the crank bearings down, and should extend the crank life. Should. Hmm.. I guess in a another few years I'll find out if that was a good idea. -------- Richard Pike Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Kingsport, TN 3TN0 Would you consider yourself to be a good person? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWcDXT6pH7A Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453450#453450 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
From: "Mcabbage" <Mc(at)americanbuilding.com>
Date: Mar 06, 2016
Thank you John. I did contact seller from the ad but I think he was busy . Maybe new owner could help some. Another question, when replacing ruder and elevater cables wher is the best source for materials? Thanks -------- 2007 Firestar 2 503 N203SD Moster 185 flattop PPG/Sky K2 Paraglider Trike Buggy Soaring Trike & Northwing Stratus XP Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453460#453460 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 06, 2016
From: Bob Underwood <bob.pipercolt(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Rotax 503 - 300 Hour Rebuild - Advice
Hi JimThanks for the info. I purchased a recently rebuilt 582 and the previ ous owner said that the man who rebuilt the engine the first time told him to fun it 100 to 1 and not decarbon it. It was overhauled with about 800 ho urs on it and was in great condition with minimal parts replaced. Interesti ng isn't it. Bob On Sunday, March 6, 2016 9:12 AM, Jim Baker wrote: Richard brings up a point that drove me to acquiring a Hirth, specifically the old 2704. Max rpm for that model is 5400. I normally fly at 3500 to 390 0 rpm, depending on the day and the resultant EGT. Combine that with 624 CC and you get a powerplant that creates its max torque well down the Rev ran ge and is creating much less heat in the cylinder per unit time than the hi gher revving two stroke. I, however,=C2- run two strokes much differently than others would. The m ost common ailment heard is burned oil creating coke on the piston crown, r ing lands (especially Dykes type, which is the type Rotax uses) and exhaust ports. The oil in the ring lands is cooked and leaves behind=C2- the car bon residue from that cooking. Same for crowns and ports. EGT is, I believe, my key. I don't run an RPM or an airspeed, simply an EGT that is sufficiently high to more completely burn the fuel mixed with the oil. Generally that's in the 1150 to 1200 range. I'll often read an article up to the point that the "expert" says no one should run below 32 or 20:1 ratios. There goes the credibility. On top of that, more oil is not better. Too much oil will cause roller bear ing balls to hydrodynamically skid instead of roll. The amount of lubricati on a quality ball bearing or needle bearing needs is vanishingly small. Con sider a wheel bearing....packed with grease, initially, after awhile the gr ease retreats from contact with the balls and ony sporadically comes in con tact, usually from some high G load such as a pothole. Re-pack a really old bearing and watch what comes out...congealed chunks of lubicant. The wrist pin needle bearings are the more susceptible to heat damage from lack of l ubrication. So. I run 100:1 oil mix. Doesn't matter which one, I'm not pushing a brand. The less oil there is, the less there is to leave carbon behind. It's a fi ne balancing act to not use too little that the bearings complain. I think I get away with it because my larger piston surface area more readily sheds heat via cylinder wall contact, less heat per unit time, and the cooling o f the underside of the piston by the incoming charge, the oil doesn't have a chance to coke and leave deposits behind. That, and the fact that I don't have a Dykes top ring. Dykes are great at more complete cylinder sealing b ecause of the larger ring/cylinder wall contact area but it also makes them hotter because of that contact. After 600 hours, no decarbon needed. Plugs have been replaced once, more fr om curiosity than anything else. They looked just like four stroke plugs, j ust a light tan and no coking up into the insulator well. Maybe I'm spouting crap. My Gordon Jennings handbook, the SAE papers I've r ead have confirmed, at least in my mind, what I've just posted....but as I said, may be crap. Or not. Jim Baker 405 426 5377 -----Original Message----- From: Richard Pike <thegreybaron(at)charter.net> Sent: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 22:48 Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Rotax 503 - 300 Hour Rebuild - Advice I think no one wants to reply because no one wants to give you bad advice. I currently have 270 hours on my 582, and plan to run it to 450 hours. Give n my age, and the number of hours I fly each year, that will probably be su fficient for my aviating future. BUT I consistently try and run it at 5,400 rpm, which keeps the centrifugal loa d on the crank bearings down, and should extend the crank life. Should. Hmm.. I guess in a another few years I'll find out if that was a good idea. -------- Richard Pike Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Kingsport, TN 3TN0 Would you consider yourself to be a good person? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWcDXT6pH7A Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453450#453450 =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- -Matt Dralle, List Admin. S - - =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- -Matt Dralle, List Admin. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
Date: Mar 06, 2016
I recommend Kolb Aircraft Company. Phone (606) 862-9692 john h mkIII Titus, Alabama -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mcabbage Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2016 8:23 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Extending instrument panel Thank you John. I did contact seller from the ad but I think he was busy . Maybe new owner could help some. Another question, when replacing ruder and elevater cables wher is the best source for materials? Thanks -------- 2007 Firestar 2 503 N203SD Moster 185 flattop PPG/Sky K2 Paraglider Trike Buggy Soaring Trike & Northwing Stratus XP Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453460#453460 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 06, 2016
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
From: Richard Girard <aslsa.rng(at)gmail.com>
For control cable, first get the proper mil spec cable, second read the section on cable in AC 43-13 1B. I know there will be a lot of carping about recommending covered cable but you owe it to yourself to read what FAA certified mechanics read when they don't have a manufacturer's spec to go by. Covered cable, one properly swaged Nico sleeve is the recommendation . Extending your panel, consider doing it with vibration dampers. You can get them from McMaster Carr as well as the specs for allowable shear loads so you can design a panel that will last. Rick Girard On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Mcabbage wrote: > > Thank you John. I did contact seller from the ad but I think he was busy . > Maybe new owner could help some. > > Another question, when replacing ruder and elevater cables wher is the > best source for materials? > > Thanks > > -------- > 2007 Firestar 2 503 N203SD > Moster 185 flattop PPG/Sky K2 Paraglider > Trike Buggy Soaring Trike & Northwing Stratus XP > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453460#453460 > > =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== > > -- =9CBlessed are the cracked, for they shall let in the light.=9D Groucho Marx <http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/43244.Groucho_Marx> ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
From: "George Alexander" <gtalexander(at)att.net>
Date: Mar 06, 2016
Mcabbage wrote: > I would like to extend my fs2 Inst. panel > > .S N I P . > > Mike Being one who must remain conscious of leg room, I would be careful how deep you make your extension and/or the top to bottom measurement. Too much in either of these dimensions will cut down that leg room. Looking at the inside shot of the pictures you posted, there's not much room between the pilot's shins and the bottom edge of the extension. As Beauford would say.... "Worth what you paid fer it.." -------- George Alexander FS II R503 N709FS http://www.oh2fly.net Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453484#453484 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 06, 2016
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com>
Looking at the inside shot of the pictures you posted, there's not much room between the pilot's shins and the bottom edge of the extension. I am not sure how big you are, but let me tell you how I get into my plane. I am 6 feet- 235 lbs. I sit backwards on my seat, lift my left leg over the stick, and down onto the rudder pedals. I of course reverse this process to get out of the plane. My plane has longer gear legs, so I had to change the method of entering the cockpit. With the smaller gear legs, One can lift up the wind screen- stick the left leg in, then put your butt on the seat. Much like what you do to get into a sports car. These are only ways to get in that I have found. Smaller younger pilots will be able to do things that I probably cannot. The only thing on my cockpit that I need to do anything with is adjust the altimeter. I do that on the ground. The rest of the controls that I need- tank selection- fuel pump, strobe, ignition switch are all located in various spots that are within reach. Primarily what I am saying is that you can position every thing that you need in spots that allow you to reach them while seated and flying. It just takes some thinking on your part. However you are the one that will be flying it, your choice, but give it some serious thought. I have a small center console in front of the stick that holds my radio, all my switches- plug ins for the intercom. HAC man system on the left side by the throttle, fuel selector switches on the gusset to the left of my seat. Take a poll and see how many have moved their console out. Larry Larry On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 9:06 PM, George Alexander wrote: > > > Mcabbage wrote: > > I would like to extend my fs2 Inst. panel > > > > .S N I P . > > > > Mike > > > Being one who must remain conscious of leg room, I would be careful how > deep you make your extension and/or the top to bottom measurement. Too > much in either of these dimensions will cut down that leg room. Looking at > the inside shot of the pictures you posted, there's not much room between > the pilot's shins and the bottom edge of the extension. > > As Beauford would say.... "Worth what you paid fer it.." > > -------- > George Alexander > FS II R503 N709FS > http://www.oh2fly.net > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453484#453484 > > -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Patrick Ladd <patrickjladd(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
Date: Mar 07, 2016
<> Thats interesting Larry. Do you not set your altimeter to read zero when you land at an away field? Normally we set QFE Baro pressure at your home field if just messing about locally. When approaching another field the local pressure will be passed to you along with wind speed and direction, circuit direction, circuit height etc. So if you are supposed to join the circuit at 1000 ft then that is the height which your altimeter shows. Pat From: Larry Cottrell Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 5:55 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Extending instrument panel Looking at the inside shot of the pictures you posted, there's not much room between the pilot's shins and the bottom edge of the extension. I am not sure how big you are, but let me tell you how I get into my plane. I am 6 feet- 235 lbs. I sit backwards on my seat, lift my left leg over the stick, and down onto the rudder pedals. I of course reverse this process to get out of the plane. My plane has longer gear legs, so I had to change the method of entering the cockpit. With the smaller gear legs, One can lift up the wind screen- stick the left leg in, then put your butt on the seat. Much like what you do to get into a sports car. These are only ways to get in that I have found. Smaller younger pilots will be able to do things that I probably cannot. The only thing on my cockpit that I need to do anything with is adjust the altimeter. I do that on the ground. The rest of the controls that I need- tank selection- fuel pump, strobe, ignition switch are all located in various spots that are within reach. Primarily what I am saying is that you can position every thing that you need in spots that allow you to reach them while seated and flying. It just takes some thinking on your part. However you are the one that will be flying it, your choice, but give it some serious thought. I have a small center console in front of the stick that holds my radio, all my switches- plug ins for the intercom. HAC man system on the left side by the throttle, fuel selector switches on the gusset to the left of my seat. Take a poll and see how many have moved their console out. Larry Larry On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 9:06 PM, George Alexander wrote: Mcabbage wrote: > I would like to extend my fs2 Inst. panel > > .S N I P . > > Mike Being one who must remain conscious of leg room, I would be careful how deep you make your extension and/or the top to bottom measurement. Too much in either of these dimensions will cut down that leg room. Looking at the inside shot of the pictures you posted, there's not much room between the pilot's shins and the bottom edge of the extension. As Beauford would say.... "Worth what you paid fer it.." -------- George Alexander FS II R503 N709FS http://www.oh2fly.net Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453484#453484 ========== br> fts!) r> > w.buildersbooks.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution -Matt Dralle, List Admin. ========== -List" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List ========== FORUMS - eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com ========== b Site - -Matt Dralle, List Admin. rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution ========== -- The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant. If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
From: "Mcabbage" <Mc(at)americanbuilding.com>
Date: Mar 07, 2016
Thanks guys yes proper planning! I am 6 feet 190 lbs size 12 sneakers! So I agree not much room down there for sure! Mike -------- 2007 Firestar 2 503 N203SD Moster 185 flattop PPG/Sky K2 Paraglider Trike Buggy Soaring Trike & Northwing Stratus XP Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453499#453499 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
From: "Mcabbage" <Mc(at)americanbuilding.com>
Date: Mar 07, 2016
Thanks guys yes proper planning! I am 6 feet 190 lbs size 12 sneakers! So I agree not much room down there for sure! Mike -------- 2007 Firestar 2 503 N203SD Moster 185 flattop PPG/Sky K2 Paraglider Trike Buggy Soaring Trike & Northwing Stratus XP Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453498#453498 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
From: "olendorf" <olendorf(at)gmail.com>
Date: Mar 07, 2016
This is how I did it. The panel is attached to a rubber hose at the bottom. The top rests against the nose cone. This allows the nose cone off by itself. Not attached to the panel at all. Yes you lose a little shin room. Just be sure to account for that. I rounded off the panel at the bottom so I didn't cut my legs off in a crash. Two things I would do differently next time around. The compass needs to be vertical. The panel should be painted black. -------- Scott Olendorf Original Firestar, Rotax 447, Powerfin prop Schenectady, NY http://sites.google.com/site/kolbfirestar/ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453501#453501 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/cimg2371_197.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/cimg2369_204.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/cimg2368_170.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/rebuild5_598.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/cimg2860_604.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
From: "Richard Pike" <thegreybaron(at)charter.net>
Date: Mar 07, 2016
lcottrell wrote: > Looking at the inside shot of the pictures you posted, there's not much room between the pilot's shins and the bottom edge of the extension. > > The only thing on my cockpit that I need to do anything with is adjust the altimeter. I do that on the ground. The rest of the controls that I need- tank selection- fuel pump, strobe, ignition switch are all located in various spots that are within reach. > > Primarily what I am saying is that you can position every thing that you need in spots that allow you to reach them while seated and flying. It just takes some thinking on your part. However you are the one that will be flying it, your choice, but give it some serious thought. I have a small center console in front of the stick that holds my radio, all my switches- plug ins for the intercom. HAC man system on the left side by the throttle, fuel selector switches on the gusset to the left of my seat. Take a poll and see how many have moved their console out. > Larry > > I agree with what Larry says here. (Even if Scott Olendorf's panel setup is extremely cool) It is really easy to make the panel on the FSII slide out a bit; notice that the wood has holes drilled in it and the windscreen tubes fit through it. You remove one screw on either side and the panel will slide up the tubes about 8 inches, plenty of room to get access to the back side. Radio Shack is out of business, but the little black box with all the switches on it has lots of room for all your wiring needs. Probably other electronics shops sell similar boxes. -------- Richard Pike Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Kingsport, TN 3TN0 Would you consider yourself to be a good person? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWcDXT6pH7A Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453512#453512 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/fs_switches_3_274.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/fs_switches_2_166.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
From: "Richard Pike" <thegreybaron(at)charter.net>
Date: Mar 07, 2016
One more thought: if you do extend the panel back toward your shins, make sure it is not rigidly attached to anything. -------- Richard Pike Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Kingsport, TN 3TN0 Would you consider yourself to be a good person? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWcDXT6pH7A Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453514#453514 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/wreck_110.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Rotax 503 - 300 Hour Rebuild - Advice
From: "miyer2u" <miyer2u(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Mar 07, 2016
Thank you Richard and Jim for your inputs! Appreciate it. Mahesh FS2 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453517#453517 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 07, 2016
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
From: Rick Neilsen <neilsenrm(at)gmail.com>
Pat Many of us live in remote locations that never talk to control towers. I think it has been ten years since talking to any tower. Even flying into the the LSA strip at Oshkosh and Sun N Fun, just flew in. I set my altimeter at the base elevation of the airport I take off from while on the ground. I have a stick that I use to adjust my altimeter and switches on the panel while belted in. I have a holder that keeps the stick safely stored when not in use. George A got a chuckle and took pictures of it a few years back. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Patrick Ladd wrote: > < the altimeter. I do that on the ground>> > Thats interesting Larry. Do you not set your altimeter to read zero when > you land at an away field? Normally we set QFE Baro pressure at your home > field if just messing about locally. When approaching another field the > local pressure will be passed to you along with wind speed and direction, > circuit direction, circuit height etc. So if you are supposed to join the > circuit at 1000 ft then that is the height which your altimeter shows. > Pat > > *From:* Larry Cottrell > *Sent:* Monday, March 7, 2016 5:55 AM > *To:* kolb-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* Re: Kolb-List: Re: Extending instrument panel > > Looking at the inside shot of the pictures you posted, there's not much > room between the pilot's shins and the bottom edge of the extension. > > > I am not sure how big you are, but let me tell you how I get into my > plane. I am 6 feet- 235 lbs. I sit backwards on my seat, lift my left leg > over the stick, and down onto the rudder pedals. I of course reverse this > process to get out of the plane. My plane has longer gear legs, so I had to > change the method of entering the cockpit. With the smaller gear legs, One > can lift up the wind screen- stick the left leg in, then put your butt on > the seat. Much like what you do to get into a sports car. These are only > ways to get in that I have found. Smaller younger pilots will be able to do > things that I probably cannot. > > The only thing on my cockpit that I need to do anything with is adjust the > altimeter. I do that on the ground. The rest of the controls that I need- > tank selection- fuel pump, strobe, ignition switch are all located in > various spots that are within reach. > > Primarily what I am saying is that you can position every thing that you > need in spots that allow you to reach them while seated and flying. It just > takes some thinking on your part. However you are the one that will be > flying it, your choice, but give it some serious thought. I have a small > center console in front of the stick that holds my radio, all my switches- > plug ins for the intercom. HAC man system on the left side by the throttle, > fuel selector switches on the gusset to the left of my seat. Take a poll > and see how many have moved their console out. > > Larry > Larry > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 9:06 PM, George Alexander > wrote: > >> >> >> Mcabbage wrote: >> > I would like to extend my fs2 Inst. panel >> > >> > .S N I P . >> > >> > Mike >> >> >> Being one who must remain conscious of leg room, I would be careful how >> deep you make your extension and/or the top to bottom measurement. Too >> much in either of these dimensions will cut down that leg room. Looking at >> the inside shot of the pictures you posted, there's not much room between >> the pilot's shins and the bottom edge of the extension. >> >> As Beauford would say.... "Worth what you paid fer it.." >> >> -------- >> George Alexander >> FS II R503 N709FS >> http://www.oh2fly.net >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453484#453484 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ========== >> br> fts!) >> r> > w.buildersbooks.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"> >> www.buildersbooks.com >> rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> -Matt Dralle, List Admin. >> ========== >> -List" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"> >> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List >> ========== >> FORUMS - >> eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com >> ========== >> b Site - >> -Matt Dralle, List Admin. >> rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> ========== >> >> >> >> > > > -- > *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* > > *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email > address before sending.* > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
From: "Mcabbage" <Mc(at)americanbuilding.com>
Date: Mar 07, 2016
Thank you Olendorf, George, Larry, John and Rick Richard- Ouch! that looks like it hurt! a lot.... it hurts just to see. Larry, how did you extend the gear legs? Many thanks Mike -------- 2007 Firestar 2 503 N203SD Moster 185 flattop PPG/Sky K2 Paraglider Trike Buggy Soaring Trike & Northwing Stratus XP Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453544#453544 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 07, 2016
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com>
"Larry, how did you extend the gear legs?" I got a pair of 4130 gear legs built by a friend that were 36 inches long. That gives me 24 inches sticking out rather than the stock alum legs. I also run 800X6 tires. Larry On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Mcabbage wrote: > > Thank you Olendorf, George, Larry, John and Rick > > Richard- Ouch! that looks like it hurt! a lot.... it hurts just to see. > > Larry, how did you extend the gear legs? > > Many thanks > Mike > > -------- > 2007 Firestar 2 503 N203SD > Moster 185 flattop PPG/Sky K2 Paraglider > Trike Buggy Soaring Trike & Northwing Stratus XP > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453544#453544 > > -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
From: "Mcabbage" <Mc(at)americanbuilding.com>
Date: Mar 07, 2016
Nice! -------- 2007 Firestar 2 503 N203SD Moster 185 flattop PPG/Sky K2 Paraglider Trike Buggy Soaring Trike & Northwing Stratus XP Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453547#453547 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 08, 2016
From: Bill Berle <victorbravo(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
The extra long 36 inch gear.... do you notice a shorter takeoff roll because of the higher ground angle of the wing??? Enquiring minds want to know ! I want to build up my Firestar 2 as a STOL airplane :) Bill Berle www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and for-profit entities -------------------------------------------- On Mon, 3/7/16, Mcabbage wrote: Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Extending instrument panel To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Date: Monday, March 7, 2016, 4:23 PM "Mcabbage" Nice! -------- 2007 Firestar 2 503 N203SD Moster 185 flattop PPG/Sky K2 Paraglider Trike Buggy Soaring Trike & Northwing Stratus XP Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453547#453547 Lists This Month -- Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!) Raiser. Click on more about Gifts provided www.buildersbooks.com -Matt Dralle, List Admin. Forum - - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - List Contribution Web Site - -Matt Dralle, List Admin. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 07, 2016
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
From: Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com>
The extra long 36 inch gear.... do you notice a shorter takeoff roll because of the higher ground angle of the wing??? Enquiring minds want to know ! I want to build up my Firestar 2 as a STOL airplane :) I am afraid that I cannot say for sure. You would have to ask others for that answer. I only know that it looks better, feels better, and I like it. :-) Larry On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Bill Berle wrote: > > The extra long 36 inch gear.... do you notice a shorter takeoff roll > because of the higher ground angle of the wing??? Enquiring minds want to > know ! I want to build up my Firestar 2 as a STOL airplane :) > > Bill Berle > www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft > www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and > for-profit entities > > -------------------------------------------- > On Mon, 3/7/16, Mcabbage wrote: > > Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Extending instrument panel > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Monday, March 7, 2016, 4:23 PM > > "Mcabbage" > > Nice! > > -------- > 2007 Firestar 2 503 N203SD > Moster 185 flattop PPG/Sky K2 Paraglider > Trike Buggy Soaring Trike & Northwing Stratus XP > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453547#453547 > > > Lists This Month -- > Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!) > Raiser. Click on > more about > Gifts provided > www.buildersbooks.com > -Matt > Dralle, List Admin. > Forum - > - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - > List Contribution Web Site - > -Matt > Dralle, List Admin. > > -- *The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant.* *If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending.* ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Patrick Ladd <patrickjladd(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
Date: Mar 08, 2016
I have a stick that I use to adjust my altimeter >> That beats the band. Well worth a chuckle. I must admit that having learned to fly in gliders where you are more than likely to land out in a field with no known height I never bothered too much. More `that elm tree is about 50 feet high, turn final a bit above it`. We also have a `transition height` when going higher for serious xcountry flights. This ensures that everyone is on the same baro. pressure to enable them to maintain the quadrantal rule accurately. Never used it myself. Pat From: Rick Neilsen Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 4:26 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Extending instrument panel Pat Many of us live in remote locations that never talk to control towers. I think it has been ten years since talking to any tower. Even flying into the the LSA strip at Oshkosh and Sun N Fun, just flew in. I set my altimeter at the base elevation of the airport I take off from while on the ground. I have a stick that I use to adjust my altimeter and switches on the panel while belted in. I have a holder that keeps the stick safely stored when not in use. George A got a chuckle and took pictures of it a few years back. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Patrick Ladd wrote: <> Thats interesting Larry. Do you not set your altimeter to read zero when you land at an away field? Normally we set QFE Baro pressure at your home field if just messing about locally. When approaching another field the local pressure will be passed to you along with wind speed and direction, circuit direction, circuit height etc. So if you are supposed to join the circuit at 1000 ft then that is the height which your altimeter shows. Pat From: Larry Cottrell Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 5:55 AM To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Extending instrument panel Looking at the inside shot of the pictures you posted, there's not much room between the pilot's shins and the bottom edge of the extension. I am not sure how big you are, but let me tell you how I get into my plane. I am 6 feet- 235 lbs. I sit backwards on my seat, lift my left leg over the stick, and down onto the rudder pedals. I of course reverse this process to get out of the plane. My plane has longer gear legs, so I had to change the method of entering the cockpit. With the smaller gear legs, One can lift up the wind screen- stick the left leg in, then put your butt on the seat. Much like what you do to get into a sports car. These are only ways to get in that I have found. Smaller younger pilots will be able to do things that I probably cannot. The only thing on my cockpit that I need to do anything with is adjust the altimeter. I do that on the ground. The rest of the controls that I need- tank selection- fuel pump, strobe, ignition switch are all located in various spots that are within reach. Primarily what I am saying is that you can position every thing that you need in spots that allow you to reach them while seated and flying. It just takes some thinking on your part. However you are the one that will be flying it, your choice, but give it some serious thought. I have a small center console in front of the stick that holds my radio, all my switches- plug ins for the intercom. HAC man system on the left side by the throttle, fuel selector switches on the gusset to the left of my seat. Take a poll and see how many have moved their console out. Larry Larry On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 9:06 PM, George Alexander wrote: Mcabbage wrote: > I would like to extend my fs2 Inst. panel > > .S N I P . > > Mike Being one who must remain conscious of leg room, I would be careful how deep you make your extension and/or the top to bottom measurement. Too much in either of these dimensions will cut down that leg room. Looking at the inside shot of the pictures you posted, there's not much room between the pilot's shins and the bottom edge of the extension. As Beauford would say.... "Worth what you paid fer it.." -------- George Alexander FS II R503 N709FS http://www.oh2fly.net Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453484#453484 ========== br> fts!) r> > w.buildersbooks.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution -Matt Dralle, List Admin. ========== -List" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List ========== FORUMS - eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com ========== b Site - -Matt Dralle, List Admin. rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution ========== -- The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant. If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email address before sending. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: K I <wrk2win4u(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
Date: Mar 08, 2016
I am in the process of rebuilding a dash for my Mark III that extends 12 in ches back to the pilot. I am 6'2" and can reach the mag switch and altimete r while still belted in. Kurt Mark III Utah ________________________________ From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com <owner-kolb-list-server@matronic s.com> on behalf of Patrick Ladd Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 2:37 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Extending instrument panel I have a stick that I use to adjust my altimeter >> That beats the band. Well worth a chuckle. I must admit that having learned to fly in gliders where you are more than likely to land out in a field with no known height I never bothered too muc h. More `that elm tree is about 50 feet high, turn final a bit above it`. W e also have a `transition height` when going higher for serious xcountry fl ights. This ensures that everyone is on the same baro. pressure to enable t hem to maintain the quadrantal rule accurately. Never used it myself. Pat From: Rick Neilsen<mailto:neilsenrm(at)gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 4:26 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Extending instrument panel Pat Many of us live in remote locations that never talk to control towers. I th ink it has been ten years since talking to any tower. Even flying into the the LSA strip at Oshkosh and Sun N Fun, just flew in. I set my altimeter at the base elevation of the airport I take off from while on the ground. I have a stick that I use to adjust my altimeter and switches on the panel while belted in. I have a holder that keeps the stick safely stored when no t in use. George A got a chuckle and took pictures of it a few years back. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Patrick Ladd > wrote: <> Thats interesting Larry. Do you not set your altimeter to read zero when yo u land at an away field? Normally we set QFE Baro pressure at your home fi eld if just messing about locally. When approaching another field the local pressure will be passed to you along with wind speed and direction, circu it direction, circuit height etc. So if you are supposed to join the circui t at 1000 ft then that is the height which your altimeter shows. Pat From: Larry Cottrell<mailto:lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 5:55 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Extending instrument panel Looking at the inside shot of the pictures you posted, there's not much roo m between the pilot's shins and the bottom edge of the extension. I am not sure how big you are, but let me tell you how I get into my plane. I am 6 feet- 235 lbs. I sit backwards on my seat, lift my left leg over th e stick, and down onto the rudder pedals. I of course reverse this process to get out of the plane. My plane has longer gear legs, so I had to change the method of entering the cockpit. With the smaller gear legs, One can lif t up the wind screen- stick the left leg in, then put your butt on the seat . Much like what you do to get into a sports car. These are only ways to ge t in that I have found. Smaller younger pilots will be able to do things th at I probably cannot. The only thing on my cockpit that I need to do anything with is adjust the altimeter. I do that on the ground. The rest of the controls that I need- t ank selection- fuel pump, strobe, ignition switch are all located in variou s spots that are within reach. Primarily what I am saying is that you can position every thing that you ne ed in spots that allow you to reach them while seated and flying. It just t akes some thinking on your part. However you are the one that will be flyin g it, your choice, but give it some serious thought. I have a small center console in front of the stick that holds my radio, all my switches- plug in s for the intercom. HAC man system on the left side by the throttle, fuel s elector switches on the gusset to the left of my seat. Take a poll and see how many have moved their console out. Larry Larry On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 9:06 PM, George Alexander > wrote: ilto:gtalexander(at)att.net>> Mcabbage wrote: > I would like to extend my fs2 Inst. panel > > .S N I P . > > Mike Being one who must remain conscious of leg room, I would be careful how dee p you make your extension and/or the top to bottom measurement. Too much i n either of these dimensions will cut down that leg room. Looking at the i nside shot of the pictures you posted, there's not much room between the pi lot's shins and the bottom edge of the extension. As Beauford would say.... "Worth what you paid fer it.." -------- George Alexander FS II R503 N709FS http://www.oh2fly.net Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453484#453484 br> fts!) r> > w.buildersbooks.com<http://w.buildersbooks.com>" rel="noreferrer" ta rget="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com<http://www.buildersbooks.com> rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution -Matt Dralle, List Admin. -List" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Naviga tor?Kolb-List FORUMS - eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com b Site - -Matt Dralle, List Admin. rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution -- The older I get, the less tolerant I am of those who are intolerant. If you forward this email, or any part of it, please remove my email addres s before sending. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
From: Dave Kulp <undoctor(at)rcn.com>
Date: Mar 08, 2016
Something to consider about your instrument panel; Autumn of '13 I took off in my FlagFly and at about 800' I had an engine out. Too low to do a 180 so I looked for a place to put it down. Lots of soybean fields so I picked the best one and, thinking the soybeans were maybe 6 - 8" high, went in to land. Found out after I was able to locate the seat belt buckle (major disorientation when hanging upside down by the belt!!) drop down and climb out before it caught fire that the soybeans are about 2 1/2 to 3' high, and the stems are like hemp ropes. When the landing gear got into the soybeans and stopped, the nose dug straight down into the ground and bent up as I was forced forward by the inertia. My shins got acquainted with the bottom of the instrument panel and I snapped off the bottom of the slip indicator with my right shin bone. Took a while to heal. If you look at the pic of the front end and wonder how my face did with the tube that supports the windscreen, not too bad, Third deep cut at the same place on the bridge of my nose in my lifetime, so the new scar is hardly noticeable. I miss the FlagFly bad but I'm not in a position to replace it just now, plus I'm a tad sensitive about 2 stroke flying now. That's just me, your mileage may vary. Dave Kulp Bethlehem, PA On 3/7/2016 10:00 AM, Richard Pike wrote: > > > lcottrell wrote: >> Looking at the inside shot of the pictures you posted, there's not much room between the pilot's shins and the bottom edge of the extension. >> >> The only thing on my cockpit that I need to do anything with is adjust the altimeter. I do that on the ground. The rest of the controls that I need- tank selection- fuel pump, strobe, ignition switch are all located in various spots that are within reach. >> >> Primarily what I am saying is that you can position every thing that you need in spots that allow you to reach them while seated and flying. It just takes some thinking on your part. However you are the one that will be flying it, your choice, but give it some serious thought. I have a small center console in front of the stick that holds my radio, all my switches- plug ins for the intercom. HAC man system on the left side by the throttle, fuel selector switches on the gusset to the left of my seat. Take a poll and see how many have moved their console out. >> Larry >> >> > > I agree with what Larry says here. (Even if Scott Olendorf's panel setup is extremely cool) > > It is really easy to make the panel on the FSII slide out a bit; notice that the wood has holes drilled in it and the windscreen tubes fit through it. You remove one screw on either side and the panel will slide up the tubes about 8 inches, plenty of room to get access to the back side. > Radio Shack is out of business, but the little black box with all the switches on it has lots of room for all your wiring needs. Probably other electronics shops sell similar boxes. > > -------- > Richard Pike > Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > Kingsport, TN 3TN0 > > Would you consider yourself to be a good person? > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWcDXT6pH7A > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453512#453512 > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/fs_switches_3_274.jpg > http://forums.matronics.com//files/fs_switches_2_166.jpg > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 08, 2016
From: william sullivan <williamtsullivan(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
Looks very repairable to me. Mine was worse than that, and went right back together. What did you do with it? Bill Sullivan -------------------------------------------- On Tue, 3/8/16, Dave Kulp wrote: Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Extending instrument panel To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2016, 12:20 PM Something to consider about your instrument panel; Autumn of '13 I took off in my FlagFly and at about 800' I had an engine out. Too low to do a 180 so I looked for a place to put it down. Lots of soybean fields so I picked the best one and, thinking the soybeans were maybe 6 - 8" high, went in to land. Found out after I was able to locate the seat belt buckle (major disorientation when hanging upside down by the belt!!) drop down and climb out before it caught fire that the soybeans are about 2 1/2 to 3' high, and the stems are like hemp ropes. When the landing gear got into the soybeans and stopped, the nose dug straight down into the ground and bent up as I was forced forward by the inertia. My shins got acquainted with the bottom of the instrument panel and I snapped off the bottom of the slip indicator with my right shin bone. Took a while to heal. If you look at the pic of the front end and wonder how my face did with the tube that supports the windscreen, not too bad, Third deep cut at the same place on the bridge of my nose in my lifetime, so the new scar is hardly noticeable. I miss the FlagFly bad but I'm not in a position to replace it just now, plus I'm a tad sensitive about 2 stroke flying now. That's just me, your mileage may vary. Dave Kulp Bethlehem, PA On 3/7/2016 10:00 AM, Richard Pike wrote: > > > lcottrell wrote: >> Looking at the inside shot of the pictures you posted, there's not much room between the pilot's shins and the bottom edge of the extension. >> >> The only thing on my cockpit that I need to do anything with is adjust the altimeter. I do that on the ground. The rest of the controls that I need- tank selection- fuel pump, strobe, ignition switch are all located in various spots that are within reach. >> >> Primarily what I am saying is that you can position every thing that you need in spots that allow you to reach them while seated and flying. It just takes some thinking on your part. However you are the one that will be flying it, your choice, but give it some serious thought. I have a small center console in front of the stick that holds my radio, all my switches- plug ins for the intercom. HAC man system on the left side by the throttle, fuel selector switches on the gusset to the left of my seat. Take a poll and see how many have moved their console out. >> Larry >> >> > > I agree with what Larry says here. (Even if Scott Olendorf's panel setup is extremely cool) > > It is really easy to make the panel on the FSII slide out a bit; notice that the wood has holes drilled in it and the windscreen tubes fit through it. You remove one screw on either side and the panel will slide up the tubes about 8 inches, plenty of room to get access to the back side. > Radio Shack is out of business, but the little black box with all the switches on it has lots of room for all your wiring needs. Probably other electronics shops sell similar boxes. > > -------- > Richard Pike > Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > Kingsport, TN 3TN0 > > Would you consider yourself to be a good person? > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWcDXT6pH7A > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=453512#453512 > > > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/fs_switches_3_274.jpg > http://forums.matronics.com//files/fs_switches_2_166.jpg > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
From: Dave Kulp <undoctor(at)rcn.com>
Date: Mar 08, 2016
I sold it to a man up on the Cape (Cod) who has a business of restoring antique cars. He called me about all the dimensions and built a stainless steel trailer to come down and pick the FlagFly up. The damage, although I ended up upside down, was solely to the cage, but I figured it would be foolish to spend the money (I'm not equipped to do it myself) to have it repaired and still have a 2 stroke engine. Now that it's gone I probably should have considered replacing the engine with a 4 stroke because it was built meticulously and I loved that little thing!!! Like a sports car in the sky. Dave On 3/8/2016 12:57 PM, william sullivan wrote: > > Looks very repairable to me. Mine was worse than that, and went right back together. What did you do with it? > > Bill Sullivan > -------------------------------------------- > On Tue, 3/8/16, Dave Kulp wrote: > > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Extending instrument panel > To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2016, 12:20 PM > > Something to consider about your > instrument panel; > Autumn of '13 I took off in my FlagFly and at about 800' I > had an engine > out. Too low to do a 180 so I looked for a place to > put it down. Lots > of soybean fields so I picked the best one and, thinking the > soybeans > were maybe 6 - 8" high, went in to land. Found out > after I was able to > locate the seat belt buckle (major disorientation when > hanging upside > down by the belt!!) drop down and climb out before it caught > fire that > the soybeans are about 2 1/2 to 3' high, and the stems are > like hemp > ropes. When the landing gear got into the soybeans and > stopped, the > nose dug straight down into the ground and bent up as I was > forced > forward by the inertia. My shins got acquainted with > the bottom of the > instrument panel and I snapped off the bottom of the slip > indicator with > my right shin bone. Took a while to heal. > > If you look at the pic of the front end and wonder how my > face did with > the tube that supports the windscreen, not too bad, > Third deep cut at > the same place on the bridge of my nose in my lifetime, so > the new scar > is hardly noticeable. I miss the FlagFly bad but I'm > not in a position > to replace it just now, plus I'm a tad sensitive about 2 > stroke flying > now. That's just me, your mileage may vary. > > Dave Kulp > Bethlehem, PA > > On 3/7/2016 10:00 AM, Richard Pike wrote: > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 08, 2016
From: Bill Berle <victorbravo(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Extending instrument panel
I'm about to receive a used FireStar 2 kit in 2 days, and I am planning to put in the 4 stroke Big Bad Twin engine from Valley Engineering. Where I'm going to fly this airplane (Los Angeles city) definitely requires the reliability of a 4 stroke. From all the research I've done, it appears to be an affordable, reliable, and good performing engine for this type aircraft. I will report on my progress with this engine. Bill Berle www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and for-profit entities -------------------------------------------- On Tue, 3/8/16, Dave Kulp wrote: Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Extending instrument panel To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2016, 10:44 AM Dave Kulp I sold it to a man up on the Cape (Cod) who has a business of restoring antique cars. He called me about all the dimensions and built a stainless steel trailer to come down and pick the FlagFly up. The damage, although I ended up upside down, was solely to the cage, but I figured it would be foolish to spend the money (I'm not equipped to do it myself) to have it repaired and still have a 2 stroke engine. Now that it's gone I probably should have considered replacing the engine with a 4 stroke because it was built meticulously and I loved that little thing!!! Like a sports car in the sky. Dave On 3/8/2016 12:57 PM, william sullivan wrote: > > Looks very repairable to me. Mine was worse than that, and went right back together. What did you do with it? > > Bill Sullivan > -------------------------------------------- > On Tue, 3/8/16, Dave Kulp wrote: > >Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Extending instrument panel >To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com >Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2016, 12:20 PM > >Something to consider about your >instrument panel; >Autumn of '13 I took off in my FlagFly and at about 800' I >had an engine >out. Too low to do a 180 so I looked for a place to >put it down. Lots >of soybean fields so I picked the best


February 06, 2016 - March 08, 2016

Kolb-Archive.digest.vol-nq