Pietenpol-Archive.digest.vol-fp

January 11, 2007 - January 30, 2007



      Skip Gadd
      csfog(at)earthlink.net
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Skip-Cinda Gadd" <csfog(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Ohio piets planning on brodhead
Date: Jan 11, 2007
Shad, I am going to try and fly Felix the GN-1 to Brodhead this summer. I live about an hour, Piet time, southeast of Columbus Ohio in West Virginia. Skip ----- Original Message ----- From: shad bell Just wondering who plans on flying up to Brodhead from Ohio or surrounding states. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: tenpol-List:OIL
Date: Jan 11, 2007
From: <harvey.rule(at)bell.ca>
I had mentioned in a letter that I was using 90 mineral oil.Correct that to be 80 mineral oil;used to work in an engine when new parts are installed or if engine is new. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Making Rib Gussets
Date: Jan 11, 2007
From: "Bill Church" <eng(at)canadianrogers.com>
You're right, Glenn, That's the way I did my gussets. Most of my gussets are made with 2" diameter discs, which are then cut into halves or quarters. Here's a link to the round gussets and sanding http://www.mykitplane.com/Planes/buildLogReportDetail.cfm?BuildLogID=115 3&PlaneID=510&FName=Bill&LName=Church&PlaneName=Air%20Camper I did also use some rectangular gussets (1" x 2 3/4") in my ribs - at three locations - the leading edge, at the rear spar, and at the trailing edge http://www.mykitplane.com/Planes/buildLogReportDetail.cfm?BuildLogID=115 7&PlaneID=510&FName=Bill&LName=Church&PlaneName=Air%20Camper Bill C ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 11, 2007
From: shad bell <aviatorbell(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Ohio piets planning on brodhead
Skip, Which day will you be flying up? Dad and I took turns last year flying and driving the "chase truck". He was in Delaware Ohio, but moved it up to my place in Centerburg OH. Stay in touch and we can try to meet up along the way. US RT 30 is a great route to follow all the way to the south edge of ORD class B then up the western side toward Rockford ILL. Centerburg might even be on your way to Brodhead with out going out of the way. Shad I am going to try and fly Felix the GN-1 to Brodhead this summer. I live about an hour, Piet time, southeast of Columbus Ohio in West Virginia. Skip --------------------------------- Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your question on Yahoo! Answers. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 11, 2007
From: shad bell <aviatorbell(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Center section butt rib location
I can't picture the fittings perfectly in my minds eye, but I think the space is to conceal the wing attatch fittings between the C-section and outter wing pannel. Look at the plans, if the outter wing pannel to c-section bolts are inside of the rib outline then that is why you will need the space between the but ribs, to get the bolts in. Greg Bacon wrote: Does anyone know if a significant reason the butt rib on the center section is 1-7/8 inch from the end of the spar while the butt rib on the wing is only 1/2 inch from the end of it's spar? It looks as though the butt rib could be closer to the end of the CS spar without causing any major problem. However, I might be failing to see potential/operational problems. I would like to have the butt ribs on the CS as far apart as possible to allow for a wider arc cut-out (instead of the flop). I'm rebuilding Mtn Piet's CS a little wider, like Bill Rewey's bird. Thanks, Greg Bacon Prairie Home, MO P.S. For the age survey, I'm 39 with only 16 days until 40! --------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: long johns
Date: Jan 11, 2007
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Corky, Don't forget to pack your long johns and some of those instant heat packets too keep your equipment from freezing up:) Bet its been a long time since you wrote your name in the snow, so being in the cold is sometimes fun. At least you don't have to dot the I like in my name. Talk about a challenge. Glad to hear you called off the Fargo trip until they get some less-brutal temperatures. I see they are calling for sub-zero lows and single digits for this weekend when you would have been there. The Yankee Boy ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Isablcorky(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 11, 2007
Subject: Re: long johns
Hey Yankee Boy, Isabelle dug up my johns so I might be ready. About the autograph, you're right it has been a long time. Once I peed all over Indiana, no problem but once in Korea we woke in our bunker to -45 and when I went it was like ice cream salt hitting the ground. Now yankee boy, top that one The Reb ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: art lesson
Date: Jan 11, 2007
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Wow Corky, I can't top that one, brother. Reminds me of the old joke where one dad is pissed because a neighbor boy kept writing his name in the snow in this guys yard and the father of the boy told the other father and he said "yeah, he shouldn't be doing that but did you notice that it is in your daughter's handwriting ??" The Yankee Boy ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Ride with these Mustangs at Oshkosh
Date: Jan 11, 2007
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Excellent video. I'd give my left one to ride with these guys.... Mike C. http://airshowbuzz.com/videos/index.php?id=2 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 11, 2007
From: "walt evans" <waltdak(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: tenpol-List:OIL
What does the 90 and 80 represent? Hopefully it's not viscosity. walt evans NX140DL "Put your wealth in knowledge, and no one can ever take it from you" Ben Franklin ----- Original Message ----- From: harvey.rule(at)bell.ca To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 8:40 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List:OIL I had mentioned in a letter that I was using 90 mineral oil.Correct that to be 80 mineral oil;used to work in an engine when new parts are installed or if engine is new. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: long johns
From: "Glenn Thomas" <glennthomas(at)flyingwood.com>
Date: Jan 11, 2007
Corky, Just curious, where were you in Korea? I was at Osan AB for 8 years. Things have changed quite a bit between our 2 tours. Funny that we still have a presence there. Kind of makes you wonder how much longer we'll be in Iraq. -------- Glenn Thomas N????? http://www.flyingwood.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86971#86971 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Isablcorky(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 11, 2007
Subject: Re: art lesson
I'm topped ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gardiner Mason" <airlion(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: bending wood
Date: Jan 11, 2007
Is there a good way to bend the 1/16 plywood around rhe leading edge? I am thinking about glueing and tacking the bottom edge and glueing to the bottom of the ribs. When this dries then I start wetting down around the leading edge to make the bend, and then I glue and tack the top. Has anyone tried this, or is there any other better way? Thanks, Gardiner Mason in Atlanta , Ga. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 11, 2007
From: "walt evans" <waltdak(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Ride with these Mustangs at Oshkosh
Kind of takes me back. My flight instructor in the 60's was a P51 pilot in the south Pacific in WWll. It's the old thing about how the young thinks about the old these days. They are just babbling old turds that had no idea. Remember me asking about his old plane, and he said that another guy had taken it. Said that the enemy had "run up his ass and got him" means alot more to me now. Got old pics of him in his P51, P39, and something else. His wife was named Ruth. So it was Ruth-less 1,2,3,4 As you get older,,,the more you know,,the less you know,,,,,wow walt evans NX140DL "Put your wealth in knowledge, and no one can ever take it from you" Ben Franklin ----- Original Message ----- From: Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC] To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 3:37 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Ride with these Mustangs at Oshkosh Excellent video. I'd give my left one to ride with these guys.... Mike C. http://airshowbuzz.com/videos/index.php?id=2 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Peter W Johnson" <vk3eka(at)bigpond.net.au>
Subject: bending wood
Date: Jan 12, 2007
Gardner, I bent my ply around a 1 inch steel tube first. I wet the ply and gradually tightened the clamps until the ply was almost bent in half. We the ply was formed I glued it to the wing. I used trailer tie down straps and staples to hold everything in place until the glue dried. If I were to do it again I would used a long piece of timber under the tie down strap along the leading edge. This would stop some indentations along the leading edge caused by uneven tension in the straps. Check out HYPERLINK "http://www.cpc-world.com/"http://www.cpc-world.com. Go to Airframe Construction > Wings > Outer Sections. There are some more pictures on Page 9 in the build photos section. Hope that helps. Peter Wonthaggi Australia HYPERLINK "http://www.cpc-world.com/"http://www.cpc-world.com _____ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Gardiner Mason Sent: Friday, 12 January 2007 10:37 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: bending wood Is there a good way to bend the 1/16 plywood around rhe leading edge? I am thinking about glueing and tacking the bottom edge and glueing to the bottom of the ribs. When this dries then I start wetting down around the leading edge to make the bend, and then I glue and tack the top. Has anyone tried this, or is there any other better way? Thanks, Gardiner Mason in Atlanta , Ga. "http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List"http://www.matronics.com/ Navigator?Pietenpol-List 2:52 PM -- 2:52 PM ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 11, 2007
From: Larry Rice <rice(at)iapdatacom.net>
Subject: Welding Rod
The conventional wisdom I always heard is to use mild steel welding rod, as the flame from the torch always adds some carbon even when it's neutral, and 4130 + carbon is too brittle. I don't know for sure if that's technically correct, but I've been up in a lot of airplanes welded with mild steel rod and I'm still here to talk about it. I use RG45 myself. Larry the micro Mong guy -- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gardiner Mason" <airlion(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: bending wood
Date: Jan 11, 2007
Peter, Thanks for the feedback,but in my case I don,t thing the straps will work. My center section-like yours- is the fuel tank closed up. I am only putting wood on that section- the wings have a metal leading edge and I used clamping straps which worked well. You do beautiful work, and I hope mine turns out pretty good. My center section will hold about 17 gallons feeding down to a 3 gallon header tank. WM Wynne is finishing my engine,but I did all the prep work. I don,t have a problem with all the wood work, but I had to cut all the metal pieces by hand and learn how to gas weld myself. I could go on and on so thanks for your help. All your pictures are a big help. I started my project in March 05, and hope to have it finished in the fall. Gardiner Mason, Atlanta, Ga. USA ----- Original Message ----- From: Peter W Johnson To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 7:16 PM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: bending wood Gardner, I bent my ply around a 1 inch steel tube first. I wet the ply and gradually tightened the clamps until the ply was almost bent in half. We the ply was formed I glued it to the wing. I used trailer tie down straps and staples to hold everything in place until the glue dried. If I were to do it again I would used a long piece of timber under the tie down strap along the leading edge. This would stop some indentations along the leading edge caused by uneven tension in the straps. Check out http://www.cpc-world.com. Go to Airframe Construction > Wings > Outer Sections. There are some more pictures on Page 9 in the build photos section. Hope that helps. Peter Wonthaggi Australia http://www.cpc-world.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Gardiner Mason Sent: Friday, 12 January 2007 10:37 AM To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Pietenpol-List: bending wood Is there a good way to bend the 1/16 plywood around rhe leading edge? I am thinking about glueing and tacking the bottom edge and glueing to the bottom of the ribs. When this dries then I start wetting down around the leading edge to make the bend, and then I glue and tack the top. Has anyone tried this, or is there any other better way? Thanks, Gardiner Mason in Atlanta , Ga. -- Date: 10/01/2007 2:52 PM -- 10/01/2007 2:52 PM ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- 1/10/2007 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rcaprd(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 11, 2007
Subject: Re: bending wood
In a message dated 1/11/2007 5:39:31 PM Central Standard Time, airlion(at)bellsouth.net writes: When this dries then I start wetting down around the leading edge to make the bend, and then I glue and tack the top. Has anyone tried this, or is there any other better way? Gardiner, The best way is according to the plans - no need to bend the plywood around the leading edge. It only goes on the top. Overlap the top of the leading edge with the forward edge of the 1/16, but not around the L. E. radius. Then blend in (sand) the top of the plywood with the leading edge. Chuck G. NX770CG ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Whaley" <MerlinFAC(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: bending wood
Date: Jan 12, 2007
>> Is there a good way to bend the 1/16 plywood around rhe leading edge? >> I am thinking about glueing and tacking the bottom edge and glueing to >> the bottom of the ribs. When this dries then I start wetting down around >> the leading edge to make the bend, and then I glue and tack the top. >> Has anyone tried this, or is there any other better way? Thanks, >> Gardiner Mason in Atlanta , Ga. Steen Aero Lab makes 1/16" vacuum-formed laminated plywood leading edges that might work for you with a little adaptation. They're VERY popular with the acro bipe crowd nowadays. Check out www.steenaero.com (look in the products section and in the online store.) Steen can do custom work on these, it's usually just a matter of how the pieces are trimmed and laid into the mold. The Obligatory Disclaimer: I work for Steen... but I thought this would be of interest to this discussion. -Mike Mike Whaley merlin@ov-10bronco.net Webmaster, OV-10 Bronco Association http://www.ov-10bronco.net/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HelsperSew(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 12, 2007
Subject: Re: bending wood
Gardiner, I did not pre-bend my 1/16" ply. It is not necessary to go under the wing, only on top. It only adds that extra "dreaded" weight anyway. I undercut (with a router) the 1/16" depth into the leading edge spruce piece, giving you a small "ledge" to nest the starting edge into, and provide a solid nailing surface. I did this by clamping a straight 1 x 4 to the top of the ribs, to use as a straight edge, so I would have something to guide the router. After this operation, you have a nice starting point for the edge of the plywood. It "nests" into the leading edge down flush, so that no sanding or feathering is needed. I began by glueing and nailing all along the starting edge (only do 8' length at a time). Just nail it down, from front to back, back and forth along the length, bending it back and nailing as you go along. I would suggest pre-starting your nails before mixing the glue. There are alot of nails to drive. I was very happy with the way mine came out. Think ahead about creating a nailing suface at the end of the operation, betwen the ribs, where it will end over the spar. I added some small strips of spruce in between the ribs so that this edge of the plywood would not "oil can" or pull down when the fabric is applied. This was one of the most fun and satisfying parts of the project for me. The toughest and most time consuming/frustrating parts of building for me was the straight axle landing gear. Praise the Lord I have finally finished this, and my Piet will at long last be standing on its own gear by the end of this weekend. Also, here is a good idea for holding those small gosh darn nails so you can drive them straight. Use a cheap wire stripper pliers, the kind with the little searations in the jaws. The little nails fit in the searations of the jaws, and it makes it very easy to hold the nails for driving. Hope all this helps. Dan Helsper Poplar Grove, IL. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: tenpol-List:OIL
Date: Jan 12, 2007
From: <harvey.rule(at)bell.ca>
I believe the number refers to weight;not sure.I just do as I'm told and my AME said use this stuff to work the engine in. ________________________________ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of walt evans Sent: January 11, 2007 4:15 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List:OIL What does the 90 and 80 represent? Hopefully it's not viscosity. walt evans NX140DL "Put your wealth in knowledge, and no one can ever take it from you" Ben Franklin ----- Original Message ----- From: harvey.rule(at)bell.ca To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 8:40 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List:OIL I had mentioned in a letter that I was using 90 mineral oil.Correct that to be 80 mineral oil;used to work in an engine when new parts are installed or if engine is new. href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat r onics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Joseph Czaplicki" <fishin3(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: help from nawthrurn
Date: Jan 12, 2007
Corky, Besides preparing yourself for the arctic trek, don't forget to have all the necessary survival gear packed away in the corner of your vehicle. Blankets, extra cloths, food rations, jumper cables, shovel, kiddie litter for traction etc. You should remember from your early days up in Wisc. And most important, your vehicle itself. Be sure your radiator is protected for the minus double digit temps that you're heading into. Chances are that Cajun auto protection temps are nowhere near what you'll be needing. Good luck for a safe trip up nawth and back. JoeC in the NE corner of IL counting the days till spring 22498 & 94634 From: Isablcorky(at)aol.com Subject: Pietenpol-List: Help from Nawthurn Pieters Nawthurn and upper mid-western Pieters, Joseph Czaplicki fishin3(at)earthlink.net EarthLink Revolves Around You. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Shawn Wolk" <shawnwolk(at)can.rogers.com>
Subject: Not Flying today!
Date: Jan 12, 2007
Hello Group, Just for info, and so you all don't believe that I've lost it. It's -37 C (-35F) here on Winnipeg this morning. And I will NOT go flying on skis today. I'll bet at this temperature the oil could be sliced like sandwich meat. Shawn Wolk C-FRAZ Winnipeg MB Canada ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Nawthurn Pieters
Date: Jan 12, 2007
From: "Dan Loegering" <danl(at)odayequipment.com>
-----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Pietenpol-List Digest Server Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 1:57 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List Digest: 25 Msgs - 01/11/07 * ================================================= Online Versions of Today's List Digest Archive ================================================= Today's complete Pietenpol-List Digest can also be found in either of the two Web Links listed below. The .html file includes the Digest formatted in HTML for viewing with a web browser and features Hyperlinked Indexes and Message Navigation. The .txt file includes the plain ASCII version of the Pietenpol-List Digest and can be viewed with a generic text editor such as Notepad or with a web browser. HTML Version: http://www.matronics.com/digest/digestview.php?Style=82701&View=html&Chapter 07-01-11&Archive=Pietenpol Text Version: http://www.matronics.com/digest/digestview.php?Style=82701&View=txt&Chapter 07-01-11&Archive=Pietenpol =============================================== Corky, Crosswinds and lightly loaded trailers are not a good combination for the roads around here right now, but I wouldn't let that deter you from making the trip up to sample our lovely weather this time of year. When Ken mentioned that you were heading this way this week, I hoped you realized what you were running into. Glad to see that you still have your "johns" - you'll need 'em! Hopefully you will get a chance to swing by and check out the projects - currently both fuselages are in my garage and we are getting close to the point of joining the fuse sides. Was out there working last night with the heaters on and a thought dawned on me as I was watching frost form on the windows. I had the inside temp up to about 60 Deg, and the outside temp was somewhere around 13 below... not too bad a temp differential! Granted it took two hours just to get it that warm and when the wife came home all that heat disappeared in about 20 seconds when she opened the garage door. But such are the challenges of building in North Dakota. If we wait a month, it will be back in the 20's - 30's and life will be good again! ;-) And now a question for all - since T-88 has a lower temp limit of 50 deg during cure, what adverse effects will happen if during the cure time, the temperature dips significantly below that point? Is the cure just slowed down and will it develop full strength if I warm the joints. Usually at the end of a build session, I usually shut down the heaters and the garage maintains it's temp long enough for the glue to cure up fully before the temp has dropped significantly. But if one of the garage doors is opened and a cold soaked car is moved in there when the OAT is -13, it tends to get pretty cold pretty quickly... I checked my joints this morning (garage temp = 30 deg, OAT = -11) and they had set, but were still soft. I will kick the heat on again this evening and warm everything up to around 60 again and hope for the best. Dan Loegering Fargo, ND ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 12, 2007
From: "Rick Holland" <at7000ft(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Welding Rod
Several 'experts' at Oshkosh recommend ER80S-D2. A welder from the company that makes the Legend Cub was welding one of their fuselages at SNF last year for a demo. He was using ER70S-2 and said their was no reason to use the more expensive ER80S-D2. Other info gathered from welding experts (many PhD metallurgists): - 80% say copper coated rod is fine, 20% say the copper contaminates the weld and you will surely die. - 50% say you don't have to stress relieve welds, 50% say you must or you will die (interestingly enough the experts from the big companies that sell tig welders all say you don't need to stress relieve) - in case you ever wondered if you need to remove all that thin black coating from 4130 tubing before welding, the guy from Legend Cub never removes any of it, and they are FAA certified. But you will find plenty of experts that will tell you that you will die if even a single molecule of that stuff gets in your weld. Don't know if I will keep cleaning that stuff off or not. Rick On 1/11/07, Larry Rice wrote: > > > The conventional wisdom I always heard is to use mild steel welding rod, > as the flame from the torch always adds some carbon even when it's > neutral, and 4130 + carbon is too brittle. I don't know for sure if > that's technically correct, but I've been up in a lot of airplanes > welded with mild steel rod and I'm still here to talk about it. I use > RG45 myself. > > Larry the micro Mong guy > > > -- > > -- Rick Holland "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad" ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 12, 2007
From: "Rick Holland" <at7000ft(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bending wood
I also pre-bent my leading edge ply Gardiner (see attached picture). Soaked it in a bath tub, stood it on edge then clamped the front 1 1/2" inch between an angle and a 1 x 2 then bent the rest over 90 degrees and let it dry. The fit was very close, when I glued it on I held it on with 5/16" staples over plastic strips for easy removal. Rick On 1/11/07, Gardiner Mason wrote: > > Is there a good way to bend the 1/16 plywood around rhe leading edge? I > am thinking about glueing and tacking the bottom edge and glueing to the > bottom of the ribs. When this dries then I start wetting down around the > leading edge to make the bend, and then I glue and tack the top. Has anyone > tried this, or is there any other better way? Thanks, Gardiner Mason in > Atlanta , Ga. > > * > > > * > > -- Rick Holland "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad" ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Nawthurn Pieters
Date: Jan 12, 2007
Dan wrote- >I checked my joints this morning (garage temp = 30 deg, OAT = -11) and >they had set, but were still soft. Yeah, I know what you mean. It gets that cold and MY joints set, too ;o) We have what's called Southern Comfort for that condition. It continues to work very well on your joints even well below 50 degrees, especially the black label version. And so this post isn't considered totally useless, I've uploaded a photo of the tailwheel hold-down release that I just made, using the idea from the "Craftsman's Corner" article with a few modifications. It is not yet flight tested, but will be soon. It's at http://www.flysquirrel.net/piets/P1120002.JPG . It does not yet have the trip cord attached; probably a length of nylon "parachute cord" will run from the split ring on the release pin, up to the cockpit. Oscar Zuniga, in warm south Texas San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags(at)hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net _________________________________________________________________ Type your favorite song. Get a customized station. Try MSN Radio powered by Pandora. http://radio.msn.com/?icid=T002MSN03A07001 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: filler for 4130
Date: Jan 12, 2007
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Rick-- most everything I referenced said that the proper filler rod for 4130N (normalized condition) was was you said the Legend Cub guys are using, AWS ER70S-2. Anything with a nice low carbon content around 0.06% carbon is good. I used 316 s/s rod which has a 0.3% carbon content. Some poo-poo stainless but low carbon is a big factor to crack-free 4130 welds. (plus a myriad of other factors like pre-heating and cool down practices. For some straight talk on welding look (once again I preach the word of Homebuilding according to the Book of Bingelis) at the Tony Bingelis books. One of the main things (and I found out by some sloppy cleaning habits early on) is to remove the oils from your 4130 before you try to weld. I had to backup and punt making my motor mount because I didn't clean out the INSIDE of the tubing and boy, does that oil like to come to the surface and bubble up thru your nice melted filler material and cause a beautiful Swiss cheese effect. MEK to the rescue. Mike C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Alan Lyscars" <alyscars(at)maine.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Nawthurn Pieters
Date: Jan 12, 2007
Nice work Oscar! Al in Maine > And so this post isn't considered totally useless, I've uploaded a photo of > the tailwheel hold-down release that I just made, using the idea from the > "Craftsman's Corner" article with a few modifications. It is not yet flight > tested, but will be soon. It's at > http://www.flysquirrel.net/piets/P1120002.JPG . It does not yet have the > trip cord attached; probably a length of nylon "parachute cord" will run > from the split ring on the release pin, up to the cockpit. > > Oscar Zuniga, in warm south Texas > San Antonio, TX > mailto: taildrags(at)hotmail.com > website at http://www.flysquirrel.net > > _________________________________________________________________ > Type your favorite song. Get a customized station. Try MSN Radio powered > by Pandora. http://radio.msn.com/?icid=T002MSN03A07001 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 12, 2007
From: "Rick Holland" <at7000ft(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: filler for 4130
Correct Mike. I started off using ER80S-D2 (which is .09% C) based on some experts suggestions at Oshkosh. But since talking to the Legend Cub guys and more research I have stayed with the ER70S-2 at .06% Carbon (and its cheaper too). Rick On 1/12/07, Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC] wrote: > > > Rick-- most everything I referenced said that the proper filler rod for > 4130N (normalized condition) was was you said the Legend Cub guys are > using, AWS ER70S-2. Anything with a nice low carbon content around > 0.06% carbon is good. I used 316 s/s rod which has a 0.3% carbon > content. Some poo-poo stainless but low carbon is a big factor to > crack-free 4130 welds. (plus a myriad of other factors like pre-heating > and cool > down practices. For some straight talk on welding look (once again I > preach the word of Homebuilding according to the Book of Bingelis) at > the Tony Bingelis books. > > One of the main things (and I found out by some sloppy cleaning habits > early on) is to remove the oils from your 4130 before you try to weld. > I had to backup and punt making my motor mount because I didn't clean out > the INSIDE of the tubing and boy, does that oil like to come to > the surface and bubble up thru your nice melted filler material and cause > a beautiful Swiss cheese effect. MEK to the rescue. > > Mike C. > > > * > > > * > > -- Rick Holland "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad" ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dale Johnson" <ddjohn(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: bending wood
Date: Jan 12, 2007
Mike The 1/16 plywood goes from the center of the front spar to 1/2 " overlap on the leading edge. It's about a 9" strip of 1/16 plywood. After gluing sand it down to feather it in with the leading edge.No wetting no bending required. Dale > [Original Message] > From: Mike Whaley <MerlinFAC(at)cfl.rr.com> > To: > Date: 1/12/2007 12:20:05 AM > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: bending wood > > > >> Is there a good way to bend the 1/16 plywood around rhe leading edge? > >> I am thinking about glueing and tacking the bottom edge and glueing to > >> the bottom of the ribs. When this dries then I start wetting down around > >> the leading edge to make the bend, and then I glue and tack the top. > >> Has anyone tried this, or is there any other better way? Thanks, > >> Gardiner Mason in Atlanta , Ga. > > Steen Aero Lab makes 1/16" vacuum-formed laminated plywood leading edges > that might work for you with a little adaptation. They're VERY popular with > the acro bipe crowd nowadays. Check out www.steenaero.com (look in the > products section and in the online store.) Steen can do custom work on > these, it's usually just a matter of how the pieces are trimmed and laid > into the mold. > > The Obligatory Disclaimer: I work for Steen... but I thought this would be > of interest to this discussion. > > -Mike > > Mike Whaley merlin@ov-10bronco.net > Webmaster, OV-10 Bronco Association > http://www.ov-10bronco.net/ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 12, 2007
From: Tim Willis <timothywillis(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Nawthurn Pieters
Beautiful, Oscar. Thanks for the pic. Used some Bridgeport time? Tim in central TX -----Original Message----- >From: Oscar Zuniga <taildrags(at)hotmail.com> >Sent: Jan 12, 2007 2:26 PM >To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Pietenpol-List: Nawthurn Pieters > > >Dan wrote- > >>I checked my joints this morning (garage temp = 30 deg, OAT = -11) and >>they had set, but were still soft. > >Yeah, I know what you mean. It gets that cold and MY joints set, too ;o) >We have what's called Southern Comfort for that condition. It continues to >work very well on your joints even well below 50 degrees, especially the >black label version. > >And so this post isn't considered totally useless, I've uploaded a photo of >the tailwheel hold-down release that I just made, using the idea from the >"Craftsman's Corner" article with a few modifications. It is not yet flight >tested, but will be soon. It's at >http://www.flysquirrel.net/piets/P1120002.JPG . It does not yet have the >trip cord attached; probably a length of nylon "parachute cord" will run >from the split ring on the release pin, up to the cockpit. > >Oscar Zuniga, in warm south Texas >San Antonio, TX >mailto: taildrags(at)hotmail.com >website at http://www.flysquirrel.net > >_________________________________________________________________ >Type your favorite song. Get a customized station. Try MSN Radio powered >by Pandora. http://radio.msn.com/?icid=T002MSN03A07001 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Greg Bacon" <gbacon67(at)hughes.net>
Subject: Re: bending wood
Date: Jan 12, 2007
John Dilatush has a really nice method for attaching the ply to the leading edge. He router cut the leading edge 1/16"th by 1/4". Attached is a quick sketch to show the detail. I used some scrap to get the angle right. This gives a 1/4" gluing surface to the leading edge without any bending around the leading edge. Greg Bacon Prairie Home, MO ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dale Johnson" <ddjohn(at)earthlink.net> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 4:42 PM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Re: bending wood > > > Mike > The 1/16 plywood goes from the center of the front spar to 1/2 " overlap > on > the > leading edge. It's about a 9" strip of 1/16 plywood. After gluing sand it > down to feather it in with the > leading edge.No wetting no bending required. > Dale > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 12, 2007
From: Larry Rice <rice(at)iapdatacom.net>
Subject: Welding Rod
I know guys who use 1/16, others who claim they get more control with 3/32, whatever workd for you. I think it's supposed to vary with the wall thickness of what you're welding, and should be pretty close to the same. Larry the micro mong guy -- ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Welding Rod
From: "Glenn Thomas" <glennthomas(at)flyingwood.com>
Date: Jan 12, 2007
Rick, That post was hillarious. Too bad there is such variance in data on such an important topic. Thanks -------- Glenn Thomas N????? http://www.flyingwood.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=87195#87195 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 12, 2007
From: shad bell <aviatorbell(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Interesting Info on leading edge sheeting
Hello Group, Just passing on some 2nd hand knowlage about leading edges that might be of interest to some Pieters. Was told by Stan McLeod (I think it was) designer of the Cavilier series of aircraft, That for the most efficiant wing the leading edge sheeting should go back to the thickest part of the wing on top. This will help keep that ridge where the fabric pulls in aft of the sheeting from forming. Even most factory built aircraft covered with fabric have a visible bump or edge all the way down the top of the wing spanwise where the fabric "bellies" down between the ribs aft of the sheeting. One solution to this (as I was told) is to take your ply back to the thickest part of the camber, and scallop the ply in a radius a litle bigger than the rib spacing if you want to save some weight. In theroy this will keep the airfoil of the covered wing much closer to the shape of the ribs. Don't hold me to this, like I said it 2nd hand info, but it makes perfect sense to me. And by more efficiant that means less drag, more lift and more speed (even though speed is not the issue for a piet). I will be trying this on my Jungster 1 biplane. One question, Does anyone on the list have any experiance with gluing fabric to rip capstrips in place of stitching. I know some of you will say NO!!! YOU HAVE TO STITCH, but any way that is how this airplane was designed, what fabric cement would you recomend? Shad --------------------------------- The fish are biting. Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: tail tiedown release
Date: Jan 12, 2007
To answer questions from several who asked about the tiedown release, the rough machine work was done by friend and KR builder extraordinaire Mark Langford in Alabama. Mark bought a mill and some other shop tools from Carl Vought's widow and this was his first little project on the mill. It's made of a hunk of aluminum scrap milled to rough shape. He also drilled the guide holes for the release pin and formed the pin from a 5/16" carriage bolt that was in the shop. Plans called for a 1/4" pin, but you use what you have. I finish-shaped the piece, rounded the edges, chamfered the holes, found a spring for it, and assembled it. There are a few things that could be done differently to make it a little better, but this one seems to work just fine as-is. Time will tell. Oscar Zuniga San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags(at)hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net _________________________________________________________________ Your Hotmail address already works to sign into Windows Live Messenger! Get it now ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HVandervoo(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 12, 2007
Subject: Re: skydiving the next generation?
Check this out _http://jet-man.com/actuel.html_ (http://jet-man.com/actuel.html) Hans ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 12, 2007
From: KMHeide <kmheidecpo(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Interesting Info on leading edge sheeting
Shad, I understand your description of the trailing edge of the leading edge material creating a "step down" of fabric. However, I have learned from other builders outside the Pietenpol ring they have used a piece of flexible material to blend in and hide the transition when fabric is applied and shrunk. I can't recall what they were using, but on many aircraft that have a leading edge wrap, filler material was utilized and no sign of any transition step was ever noticed. shad bell wrote: Hello Group, Just passing on some 2nd hand knowlage about leading edges that might be of interest to some Pieters. Was told by Stan McLeod (I think it was) designer of the Cavilier series of aircraft, That for the most efficiant wing the leading edge sheeting should go back to the thickest part of the wing on top. This will help keep that ridge where the fabric pulls in aft of the sheeting from forming. Even most factory built aircraft covered with fabric have a visible bump or edge all the way down the top of the wing spanwise where the fabric "bellies" down between the ribs aft of the sheeting. One solution to this (as I was told) is to take your ply back to the thickest part of the camber, and scallop the ply in a radius a litle bigger than the rib spacing if you want to save some weight. In theroy this will keep the airfoil of the covered wing much closer to the shape of the ribs. Don't hold me to this, like I said it 2nd hand info, but it makes perfect sense to me. And by more efficiant that means less drag, more lift and more speed (even though speed is not the issue for a piet). I will be trying this on my Jungster 1 biplane. One question, Does anyone on the list have any experiance with gluing fabric to rip capstrips in place of stitching. I know some of you will say NO!!! YOU HAVE TO STITCH, but any way that is how this airplane was designed, what fabric cement would you recomend? Shad --------------------------------- The fish are biting. Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing. --------------------------------- Get your own web address. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 12, 2007
From: KMHeide <kmheidecpo(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: A response to having a flyin..
YAHOO.Shortcuts.hasSensitiveText = true; YAHOO.Shortcuts.doUlt = false; YAHOO.Shortcuts.location = "us"; YAHOO.Shortcuts.lang = "us"; YAHOO.Shortcuts.annotationSet = { lw_1168663128_0: { text: 'Arlington', weight: 0.835352, type: ['shortcuts:/us/instance/place/ambiguous'] , metaData: [ { geoArea: "249.207", geoCountry: "United States", geoCounty: "Tarrant", geoIsoCountryCode: "US", geoLocation: "(-97.107872, 32.735119)", geoName: "Arlington", geoPlaceType: "Town", geoState: "Texas", geoStateCode: "TX", geoTown: "Arlington", type: "shortcuts:/us/instance/place/us/town"}, { geoArea: "144.307", geoCountry: "United States", geoCounty: "Arlington", geoIsoCountryCode: "US", geoLocation: "(-77.083817, 38.89077)", geoName: "Arlington", geoPlaceType: "Town", geoState: "Virginia", geoStateCode: "VA", geoTown: "Arlington", type: "shortcuts:/us/instance/place/us/town"} ] }, lw_1168663128_1: { text: 'Seattle', weight: 0.947381, type: ['shortcuts:/us/instance/place/us/town'] , metaData: { geoArea: "258.925", geoCountry: "United States", geoCounty: "King", geoIsoCountryCode: "US", geoLocation: "(-122.32974, 47.603458)", geoName: "Seattle", geoPlaceType: "Town", geoState: "Washington", geoStateCode: "WA", geoTown: "Seattle", type: "shortcuts:/us/instance/place/us/town" } }, lw_1168663128_2: { text: 'FlyChallenger-unsubscribe(at)yahoogroups.com', weight: 1, type: ['shortcuts:/us/instance/identifier/email_address']} }; YAHOO.Shortcuts.overlaySpaceId = "97546169"; YAHOO.Shortcuts.hostSpaceId = "97546168"; I can see it now: "Deckard Field, E021GW inbound for landing." "1GW be advised that landing on this airfield could lead to serious injury or death. Land only at your own risk. Owners of this field cannot be held responsible for claims, actions or judgments resulting from damages to persons or property in the use of this land for the purpose of landing, taxing, parking, storage or departure of your aircraft. While you are on the property, personal safety equipment is required but not provided. Please verbally acknowledge your unconditional acceptance of these terms by repeating the following: I One Golf Whisky hereby acknowledge that I have voluntarily chosen to land my craft and use the facilities at Deckard Field (hereinafter called "Jerry's Patch"). I understand the risks involved in the fly-in activities. I recognize that this activity involves risk of injury and I agree to accept any and all risks associated with it, including but not limited to property damage or loss, minor bodily injury, severe bodily injury, and death. Furthermore, I recognize that this activity involves risks incidental thereto, including but not limited to, travel to and from the restroom, parking and hangar areas. There is limited availability of medical assistance and the possiblity of reckless conduct of others present. I am voluntarily participating in the activities with full knowledge of the risks involved and hereby agree to accept any and all inherent risks of property damage, bodily injury, or death. In consideration of my participation in the fly-in and to the fullest extent permitted by law, I agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Jerry's Patch, its officers, directors, employees, agents, volunteers and assigns from and against all claims arising out of or resulting from my participation in the event. "Claim" as used in this agreement means any financial loss, claim, suit, action, damage, or expense, including but not limited to attorney's fees, attributable to bodily injury, sickness, disease or death, or injury to or destruction of tangible property including loss of use resulting therefrom. In addition, I hereby voluntarily hold harmless Jerry's Patch, its officers, directors, employees, agents, volunteers and assigns from any and all claims, both present and future, that may be made by me, my family, estate, heirs or assigns. I hereby expressly agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Jerry's Patch, its officers, directors, employees, agents, volunteers and assigns for any claim arising out of or incident to my participation in the fly-in, unless claim is caused by sole negligence or willful misconduct. I also understand that Jerry's Patch does not provide any medical or dental insurance or life insurance to cover bodily injury, illness or death, nor insurance for personal property damage or loss, nor insurance for liability arising out of my negligent acts or poor pilotage; and I acknowledge that I am completely responsible for my own insurance to cover these expenses. I further understand that this acknowledgment of risk and hold harmless is intended to be as broad and inclusive as permitted by the laws of the State of Washington and that if any portion hereof is held invalid, I agree that the balance shall, notwithstanding, continue in full legal force and effect. I agree that this acknowledgment of risk and hold harmless is effective for as long as I participate in the fly-in." . . . --- In FlyChallenger@ yahoogroups. com, "Jerry Deckard" wrote: > > This is an example of why I don't have flyin's at my strip. I would love to have them, but don't want to take the chance. > Jerry > --------------------------------- Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your question on Yahoo! Answers. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rcaprd(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 13, 2007
Subject: Re: Interesting Info on leading edge sheeting
Shad, and all, None of the posts about how to install the plywood is better than the way Bernard shows to do it in the plans. However, bending it around the leading edge, notching and nesting the plywood into leading edge, and scalloping the plywood between the ribs WILL be more work, with No advantage !! The real beauity of the Pietenpol is in it's simplicity. The Jungster 1 biplane is quite a different design than the Pietenpol, and should not influence anyone to build the Pietenpol wing, using anything other than the conventional ribstiching method. Chuck G. NX770CG ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: tail tiedown release
Date: Jan 13, 2007
Oscar, Great looking release! Looking forward to your report once you've used it. Gene : > > Your Hotmail address already works to sign into Windows Live Messenger! > Get it now > > > Checked by PC Tools AntiVirus (3.1.0.10 - 9.055.001). > http://www.pctools.com/anti-virus/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Isablcorky(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 13, 2007
Subject: Re: A response to having a flyin..
Ken, Is this the place where I am to pick up Blue Boy? Corky ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 13, 2007
From: KMHeide <kmheidecpo(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: A response to having a flyin..
No.....It was just a post from another flyer who made it know he was not going to host any flyins on his strip... Isablcorky(at)aol.com wrote: Ken, Is this the place where I am to pick up Blue Boy? Corky --------------------------------- Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Andimaxd(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 13, 2007
Subject: flying straight
Howdy group, It's cold down here in Texas today... I've been a lurker for quiet some time. I'm afraid of heights and don't really believe in airplane's, I've heard they are really dangerous. I can barely stand on a ladder without getting scared. All that said, we mounted our vertical stabilizer straight with the world, no offset in the front to counter P-factor and torque. I was just wondering what the experts here thought about this. Will I end up having to put a degree or two in, will it be noticeable, or can it be fixed with a ground adjustable tab on the rudder or what? I would like to know in inches how far the offset is (and in which direction) it should be, half inch, one inch or whatever some of you are flying with. The A-75 does have an offset, I don't remember exactly how much; and how many flying have no offset... Thanks in advance, Max L. Davis Arlington, TX. NX101XW (Reserved) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Glass" <redsglass(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: flying straight
Date: Jan 13, 2007
Hi Max Here attached is a picture of an adjuster I had copied and filed away. Best regards Steve in Maine >From: Andimaxd(at)aol.com >Reply-To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Pietenpol-List: flying straight >Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:35:52 EST > >Howdy group, > >It's cold down here in Texas today... > >I've been a lurker for quiet some time. I'm afraid of heights and don't >really believe in airplane's, I've heard they are really dangerous. I can >barely stand on a ladder without getting scared. > > >All that said, we mounted our vertical stabilizer straight with the world, >no offset in the front to counter P-factor and torque. I was just >wondering >what the experts here thought about this. Will I end up having to put a >degree or two in, will it be noticeable, or can it be fixed with a ground >adjustable tab on the rudder or what? I would like to know in inches how >far the >offset is (and in which direction) it should be, half inch, one inch or >whatever >some of you are flying with. The A-75 does have an offset, I don't >remember >exactly how much; and how many flying have no offset... > >Thanks in advance, >Max L. Davis >Arlington, TX. >NX101XW (Reserved) _________________________________________________________________ Your Hotmail address already works to sign into Windows Live Messenger! Get it now ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Andimaxd(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 13, 2007
Subject: Re: flying straight
In a message dated 1/13/2007 3:50:29 P.M. Central Standard Time, redsglass(at)hotmail.com writes: Here attached is a picture of an adjuster I had copied and filed away. Best regards Steve in Maine Steve, I appreciate your picture, I've seen it before. My issue is that mine is installed, sans adjustment apparatus. I'm just wondering what to expect during the flight phase. I think Chuck G.'s is straight like mine, but I can't remember for sure. Max ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "gcardinal" <gcardinal(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: flying straight
Date: Jan 13, 2007
I would strongly suggest you build in a means of adjusting both the vertical and horizontal stabilizers for trim adjustments. You will be glad you did if you discover that you need it. Greg C. ----- Original Message ----- From: Andimaxd(at)aol.com To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 2:35 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: flying straight Howdy group, It's cold down here in Texas today... I've been a lurker for quiet some time. I'm afraid of heights and don't really believe in airplane's, I've heard they are really dangerous. I can barely stand on a ladder without getting scared. All that said, we mounted our vertical stabilizer straight with the world, no offset in the front to counter P-factor and torque. I was just wondering what the experts here thought about this. Will I end up having to put a degree or two in, will it be noticeable, or can it be fixed with a ground adjustable tab on the rudder or what? I would like to know in inches how far the offset is (and in which direction) it should be, half inch, one inch or whatever some of you are flying with. The A-75 does have an offset, I don't remember exactly how much; and how many flying have no offset... Thanks in advance, Max L. Davis Arlington, TX. NX101XW (Reserved) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rcaprd(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 13, 2007
Subject: Re: flying straight
In a message dated 1/13/2007 4:21:29 PM Central Standard Time, Andimaxd(at)aol.com writes: Steve, I appreciate your picture, I've seen it before. My issue is that mine is installed, sans adjustment apparatus. I'm just wondering what to expect during the flight phase. I think Chuck G.'s is straight like mine, but I can't remember for sure. Max Hey Mad Dawg, You're right, my vertical fin is straight. After flying for a couple of years with a very slight pressure on the right rudder bar, I decided to install a non adjustable trim tab on the rudder, similar in design to the ones that I have on the flippers. I used a 5" piece of balsa wood trailing edge (from the hobby store for R.C. planes), and duct taped it to the center of the trailing edge of the rudder. I radiused the leading edge of the balsa, to match the trailing edge of the rudder, with sand paper wrapped around an ink pen. Put a slight angle on each end, so it can blend in. Duct tape it at an approximate angle, and go fly. I've adjusted the angle twice, and now I have a permanent angle, that allows neutral pressure on the rudder bar. Now I remove the duct tape, and glue it on at that angle, cover it with fabric & paint. Using this method makes a clean looking install, and no screws are needed. I've got a picture of the method here - http://nx770cg.com/Fuselage.html Fine tune the pitch trim with the flying wires on the tail, by adjusting the turnbuckles to raise or lower the leading edge of the horizontal stab. Chuck G. NX770CG slip sliding on the ice ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 14, 2007
From: "walt evans" <waltdak(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: flying straight
Max, I can just report how mine handles. My tail section is right to plans. The mount is right to plans, with the exception of extending 1 3/4" (approx) On climbout you need to hold right rudder, At cruise, no rudder needed, flies straight walt evans NX140DL "Put your wealth in knowledge, and no one can ever take it from you" Ben Franklin ----- Original Message ----- From: Andimaxd(at)aol.com To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 3:35 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: flying straight Howdy group, It's cold down here in Texas today... I've been a lurker for quiet some time. I'm afraid of heights and don't really believe in airplane's, I've heard they are really dangerous. I can barely stand on a ladder without getting scared. All that said, we mounted our vertical stabilizer straight with the world, no offset in the front to counter P-factor and torque. I was just wondering what the experts here thought about this. Will I end up having to put a degree or two in, will it be noticeable, or can it be fixed with a ground adjustable tab on the rudder or what? I would like to know in inches how far the offset is (and in which direction) it should be, half inch, one inch or whatever some of you are flying with. The A-75 does have an offset, I don't remember exactly how much; and how many flying have no offset... Thanks in advance, Max L. Davis Arlington, TX. NX101XW (Reserved) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Roman Bukolt" <conceptmodels(at)tds.net>
Subject: Re: flying straight
Date: Jan 14, 2007
For what it's worth, My Piet's vertical stabilizer is centered on the fuse center line and it flies straight with no ruddeer input. Roman Bukolt NX 20795 ----- Original Message ----- From: Rcaprd(at)aol.com To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 10:21 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: flying straight In a message dated 1/13/2007 4:21:29 PM Central Standard Time, Andimaxd(at)aol.com writes: Steve, I appreciate your picture, I've seen it before. My issue is that mine is installed, sans adjustment apparatus. I'm just wondering what to expect during the flight phase. I think Chuck G.'s is straight like mine, but I can't remember for sure. Max Hey Mad Dawg, You're right, my vertical fin is straight. After flying for a couple of years with a very slight pressure on the right rudder bar, I decided to install a non adjustable trim tab on the rudder, similar in design to the ones that I have on the flippers. I used a 5" piece of balsa wood trailing edge (from the hobby store for R.C. planes), and duct taped it to the center of the trailing edge of the rudder. I radiused the leading edge of the balsa, to match the trailing edge of the rudder, with sand paper wrapped around an ink pen. Put a slight angle on each end, so it can blend in. Duct tape it at an approximate angle, and go fly. I've adjusted the angle twice, and now I have a permanent angle, that allows neutral pressure on the rudder bar. Now I remove the duct tape, and glue it on at that angle, cover it with fabric & paint. Using this method makes a clean looking install, and no screws are needed. I've got a picture of the method here - http://nx770cg.com/Fuselage.html Fine tune the pitch trim with the flying wires on the tail, by adjusting the turnbuckles to raise or lower the leading edge of the horizontal stab. Chuck G. NX770CG slip sliding on the ice ________________________________________________________________________________
From: lshutks(at)webtv.net (Leon Stefan)
Date: Jan 14, 2007
Subject: Flying straight
I built "hard points" on the trailing edges of my elevator, and rudder just in case I need to add trim tabs. Not as pretty as stab. adjustments, but much, much less work. Leon S. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: NX41CC is rolling again
Date: Jan 14, 2007
Howdy, Pieters- Yesterday goes down in my memoirs as a red-letter day. Saturday, Jan. 13, in the final fading minutes of the day, I taxied 41CC up and down the runway at Zapata County Airport to the applause of a cheering crowd of several uncaring South Texas coyotes and one grizzled old airport manager. The A65 thundered mightily, with all those hungry horses just waiting to be let out of the corral... but never saw more than a couple of hundred RPM this day on the ground. The weather was perfect. Very slight breeze, overcast, 80 degrees (yes, EIGHTY degrees Fahrenheit, you northerners), and I had just worked furiously to get the brakes finished up and the cowlings back on before dark. An old Alabama A&P with a long southern drawl had signed off the annual inspection about an hour earlier after only picking up a few little squawks, and neither the airplane nor I had any more excuses. My instructor (the grizzled old airport manager) propped it off with me at the controls and the A65 fired on the first blade after sitting quietly since Thanksgiving, oil pressure came right up, thumbs went up, chocks were pulled, and off I went. It was my first time at the controls of a fully operational and airworthy Pietenpol. I only had a few minutes of daylight left, but it was enough to let me taxi around on the apron, get a feel for the rudder bar and brakes, then roll up and down the runway to get a feel for the view over the nose and the general ground handling characteristics. The biggest surprise was how responsive the airplane is to the rudder and steerable tailwheel. I was expecting the usual slow swing of the tail, but this airplane is almost zippy enough on the ground to run a slalom course. It was absolutely delightful to taxi this airplane, but I'll have to watch the rudder dance to make sure I don't overcontrol it on the ground. More taxiing is in store, to be followed by return to flight. Right now I have a brake on the port side that will not release completely. The shoes stay on the disk pretty tightly, and post-taxi inspection (my hand) proved that the port side brake was mucho hot while the starboard brake was not. I may have to disassemble the wheel cylinder to see if the piston is dragging or something. Any ideas on what might be wrong are appreciated. Weather will be very bad for at least the next week, but soon enough 41CC will again grace the skies of South Texas! Thanks to everyone who has helped along the way... Corky, Randy, Mark, Jeff, Mike, and a host of others. I know I keep repeating myself, but there have been so many who have helped me with so many different things over the last two years. I owe you all rides ;o) Oscar Zuniga San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags(at)hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net _________________________________________________________________ Your Hotmail address already works to sign into Windows Live Messenger! Get it now ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Isablcorky(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 14, 2007
Subject: Re: NX41CC is rolling again
Oscar, It's like beautiful music to these ears. Corky ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 14, 2007
From: KMHeide <kmheidecpo(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: NX41CC is rolling again
Oscar...... My address if Fargo, ND and I'll take that ride this June 12, 2007 between the hours of 4:30 and 5:30 PM. I'll have the lawn chairs out and steaks on the grill for when you arrive. I would like a nice flight from Hawley Airport down into Elbow Lake Airport and back. Ken Heide Fargo, ND Oscar Zuniga wrote: Howdy, Pieters- Yesterday goes down in my memoirs as a red-letter day. Saturday, Jan. 13, in the final fading minutes of the day, I taxied 41CC up and down the runway at Zapata County Airport to the applause of a cheering crowd of several uncaring South Texas coyotes and one grizzled old airport manager. The A65 thundered mightily, with all those hungry horses just waiting to be let out of the corral... but never saw more than a couple of hundred RPM this day on the ground. The weather was perfect. Very slight breeze, overcast, 80 degrees (yes, EIGHTY degrees Fahrenheit, you northerners), and I had just worked furiously to get the brakes finished up and the cowlings back on before dark. An old Alabama A&P with a long southern drawl had signed off the annual inspection about an hour earlier after only picking up a few little squawks, and neither the airplane nor I had any more excuses. My instructor (the grizzled old airport manager) propped it off with me at the controls and the A65 fired on the first blade after sitting quietly since Thanksgiving, oil pressure came right up, thumbs went up, chocks were pulled, and off I went. It was my first time at the controls of a fully operational and airworthy Pietenpol. I only had a few minutes of daylight left, but it was enough to let me taxi around on the apron, get a feel for the rudder bar and brakes, then roll up and down the runway to get a feel for the view over the nose and the general ground handling characteristics. The biggest surprise was how responsive the airplane is to the rudder and steerable tailwheel. I was expecting the usual slow swing of the tail, but this airplane is almost zippy enough on the ground to run a slalom course. It was absolutely delightful to taxi this airplane, but I'll have to watch the rudder dance to make sure I don't overcontrol it on the ground. More taxiing is in store, to be followed by return to flight. Right now I have a brake on the port side that will not release completely. The shoes stay on the disk pretty tightly, and post-taxi inspection (my hand) proved that the port side brake was mucho hot while the starboard brake was not. I may have to disassemble the wheel cylinder to see if the piston is dragging or something. Any ideas on what might be wrong are appreciated. Weather will be very bad for at least the next week, but soon enough 41CC will again grace the skies of South Texas! Thanks to everyone who has helped along the way... Corky, Randy, Mark, Jeff, Mike, and a host of others. I know I keep repeating myself, but there have been so many who have helped me with so many different things over the last two years. I owe you all rides ;o) Oscar Zuniga San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags(at)hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net _________________________________________________________________ Your Hotmail address already works to sign into Windows Live Messenger! Get it now --------------------------------- Don't pick lemons. See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gardiner Mason" <airlion(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: bending wood
Date: Jan 14, 2007
Rick, thanks for the feedback. I have already wraped the leading edge of both wings with metal,and it worked fine. The center section is where I will use wood. I have decided to glue the bottom on first and then the top next. I will use Z Grip to fair off the front edge. By the way, what is all that white stuff behind your house? Down here in Ga. we just have Georgia ice cream. I am going to Fl this weekend to get my engine. William says he has all the parts and come on down to finish putting it together. Take care, Gardiner. ----- Original Message ----- From: Rick Holland To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 2:34 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: bending wood I also pre-bent my leading edge ply Gardiner (see attached picture). Soaked it in a bath tub, stood it on edge then clamped the front 1 1/2" inch between an angle and a 1 x 2 then bent the rest over 90 degrees and let it dry. The fit was very close, when I glued it on I held it on with 5/16" staples over plastic strips for easy removal. Rick On 1/11/07, Gardiner Mason wrote: Is there a good way to bend the 1/16 plywood around rhe leading edge? I am thinking about glueing and tacking the bottom edge and glueing to the bottom of the ribs. When this dries then I start wetting down around the leading edge to make the bend, and then I glue and tack the top. Has anyone tried this, or is there any other better way? Thanks, Gardiner Mason in Atlanta , Ga. http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List http://forums.matronics.com -- Rick Holland "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad" ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- 1/12/2007 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: NX41CC is rolling again
Date: Jan 14, 2007
Ken; I'll be happy to give you that ride up in Fargo if you'll help me convert a little box of Bendix parts into an impulse coupling for my left mag, installed and timed. I don't dare touch a magneto, don't know anything about working on or timing them, have the parts, want to add impulse to my left mag, and might be able to do that flight sometime if you've got the know-how. But I sure ain't going up your way before the spring thaw, and June might not be warm enough up your way! Oscar Zuniga San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags(at)hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net _________________________________________________________________ Fixing up the home? Live Search can help ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Catdesigns" <catdesigns(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: wet wood?
Date: Jan 14, 2007
Hey Don, Glad to hear your finally going to build a Piet. I soaked my wing upper wing rib piece in my bathtub for about 2 or 3 hours so I could bend it. They are nice and wet when I take them out, as in really wet and pliable. I have not noticed any staining, weakness or discoloration from this. What you need to watch out for is getting a piece of dusty or dirty wood wet. This will drive the dirt into the wood and stain it. Also, some how something leaked into my fuselage and stained the mahogany plywood on the floor. I think it was water off the garage door as I would open it though I'm not sure as I never saw it drip nor have I since seen it drip. In any event I think the plywood might stain easily. I would think if you wrap it up as tight as you can you will be fine. Just make sure you open it up to dry out as soon as possible. Chris Tracy Sacramento, Ca Website at http://www.Westcoastpiet.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: For Sale - Piet Ribs
Date: Jan 15, 2007
From: "Jack T. Textor" <jtextor(at)thepalmergroup.com>
God morning all. Recently, I purchased a partially completed project from David Paulsen in Missouri. I don't need the ribs, so plan to sell them. There are 33 ribs, built for a 1" spar, glued with T88. The spruce was from Wicks. David did a good job, but they will require a couple of hours cleaning them up a bit. You can see some pictures on my site www.textors.com <http://www.textors.com/> , under Piet Project, towards the bottom. I'm asking $300.00, plus packaging and shipping. If you have questions or wish to purchase, drop me an email at jtextor(at)thepalmergroup.com. Thanks, Jack Textor Des Moines, IA ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: tail brace fittings
Date: Jan 15, 2007
From: "Arden Adamson" <aadamson(at)wnmdag.org>
Gentlemen, I have a simple question I'd like your opinion on. Do you mount the wire brace fittings for the rudder and horizontal stabilizer under the covering and protruding through or on top of the covering? Does it even matter? What did you do and/or what do you recommend? Any thoughts would be appreciated. Arden ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: For Sale - Piet Ribs
Date: Jan 15, 2007
From: amsafetyc(at)aol.com
Jack, Let me know shipping and prep cost, to Lititz, Pennsylvania 17543. I think w e have a deal, will confirm but just about certain I want the ribs, unless y ou have already sold them. Please advise as soon as possible, my project make take off on an accerlerat ed rate of build. Thanks John Recine office number and answering machine 717-627-4901 -----Original Message----- From: jtextor(at)thepalmergroup.com Sent: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 9:54 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: For Sale - Piet Ribs God morning all. Recently, I purchased a partially completed project from D avid Paulsen in Missouri. I don=99t need the ribs, so plan to sell th em. There are 33 ribs, built for a 1=9D spar, glued with T88. The sp ruce was from Wicks. David did a good job, but they will require a couple o f hours cleaning them up a bit. You can see some pictures on my site www.te xtors.com, under Piet Project, towards the bottom. I=99m asking $300. 00, plus packaging and shipping. If you have questions or wish to purchase, drop me an email at jtextor(at)thepalmergroup.com. Thanks, Jack Textor Des Moines, IA ________________________________________________________________________ ee AOL Mail and more. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 15, 2007
From: shad bell <aviatorbell(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Congradulations Oscar
Oscar, Its a great feeling isn't it! NX92GB is pretty well behaved on the ground (except the old goose the throtle smash the rudder and aim the stick at the ground to turn routine), and I imagine your piet is also. There is definatly plenty of rudder athority with slow speeds. I have no experiance with a steerable tailwheel (on a piet) but don't think it would be any harder to control than a Cub or Champ. Just fly it by feel and carry a little extra speed on final untill you get the feel of the landings. I was a little too hot on my 1st landing and used up a lot of runway but touched down smoothly. It wont float as much as a cub or champ with one person aboard. It will flare loose speed rapidly and just bump down and stay down. Start at 55-60 mph over the fence and work down to what you feel it should be. I flew a cub for the 1st time this past November and with me and the owner aboard (probably a little over gross) it was heavy but acted very similar to the piet on landing when I came in at 50mph. Take your time, do things in your own time, and enjoy the hell out of it!! CONGRATS Shad --------------------------------- We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: tail brace fittings
From: Hans Vander Voort <hans.vander.voort(at)alfalaval.com>
Date: Jan 15, 2007
Arden, It is up to your personal preference how you do it, I do not think there is right or wrong way here I did mine under the fabric, just like BHP's last original. Hans "Arden Adamson" <aadamson@wnmdag. org> To Sent by: owner-pietenpol-l cc ist-server@matron ics.com Subject Pietenpol-List: tail brace fittings 01/15/2007 09:57 AM Please respond to pietenpol-list@ma tronics.com Gentlemen, I have a simple question Id like your opinion on. Do you mount the wire brace fittings for the rudder and horizontal stabilizer under the covering and protruding through or on top of the covering? Does it even matter? What did you do and/or what do you recommend? Any thoughts would be appreciated. Arden ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 15, 2007
From: DONALD COOLEY <adonjr(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Apology
Hello, group, I apologize for forgetting to snip before I replied to yesterday's digest. I'll be more careful in the future. Keep the sawdust flying! Don Cooley Pietenpol-List Digest Server wrote: * ================================================= Online Versions of Today's List Digest Archive ================================================= ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Singleton" <slsingleton(at)cvalley.net>
Subject: Re: Another dumb question
Date: Jan 15, 2007
---Hi everyone- I've found a source locally that has 1/8in Baltic Birch in 5x5 sheets and am wanting to use it for Gusset material. Would this be aceptable to use? Thanks. Steve Singleton ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 15, 2007
From: Kip and Beth Gardner <kipandbeth(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Another dumb question
Steve, Baltic Birch is an interior grade plywood (the glue is not waterproof), and is NOT recommended for aircraft. The other consideration is that is mainly intended for finish applications - the interior plys may not be up to aircraft spec structurally. What you can use that is cheaper than aircraft grade is Marine Grade plywood that meets a spec (don't remember the #) for waterproofness, quality of interior plys, etc. It is generally sold in metric thicknesses (made in Israel), so you'll need to convert (~25mm/inch). If I remember correctly, the best source for this is a marine building supply company that's called Noah's (?). They have locations in Buffalo and Toronto. Kip Gardner > > >---Hi everyone- I've found a source locally that has 1/8in Baltic >Birch in 5x5 sheets and am wanting to use it for Gusset material. >Would this be aceptable to use? Thanks. Steve Singleton > > ><http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List -- North Canton, OH ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "MICHAEL SILVIUS" <M.Silvius(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: wet wood?
Date: Jan 15, 2007
Donald: I live less than a half mile form Richard Decosta. I thought he had sold that about 2 years ago but my UPS man just told me it was still in his garage last week. I have seen the plane it is a nice short fuselage Piet built to the original construction manual if I recall correctly. I passed on buying it as I could not fit in the short fuse with my big clodhoppers. As for wrapping the thing with shipping grade saran wrap you'd likely be fine. Just be sure to wrap in the right direction so the wind don't blow it off. U-Haul sells the stuff in 18 inch wide rolls. Transport should be easy as it is the 3 piece wing. If you are really concerned we are right on the coast an thus we have a lot of boating around here. And we also have a lot of folks that do shrink wrapping of boats for winter storage. I am certain that if you were up for it you could get it shrink wrapped for the trip by one of the fellows that do that around here. Richard or myself could come up with some phone numbers for you. It may give you the extra peace of mind for the long journey. I hauled a project home from western Vermont just a week before Christmas and was having a kinipshen fit when I went through a couple of rain brief and ever so slight showers. They passed quick enough. http://rides.webshots.com/album/147451245dhnmgI the piet parts are in the basement for now michael silvius scarborough, maine ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "MICHAEL SILVIUS" <M.Silvius(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Another dumb question
Date: Jan 15, 2007
Re: Pietenpol-List: Another dumb questionhttp://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/wppages/finnishbirch.php http://www.wicksaircraft.com/catalog/product_cat.php/subid=9/index.html http://www.wicksaircraft.com/catalog/product_cat.php/subid=8/index.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Singleton" <slsingleton(at)cvalley.net>
Subject: Re: Another dumb question
Date: Jan 15, 2007
Re: Pietenpol-List: Another dumb questionThanks Kip-The price was really cheap. I guess thats why. Just a tibit of info-I'm 48 and yes a waist line that should be somewhat smaller. I built the ribs last winter (glued them up in the living room) If i have the Piet done by the time I'm 50 I'll be doing great. I only fell twice today on the ice comeing and going between the shop and house. Steve Singleton ----- Original Message ----- From: Kip and Beth Gardner To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 5:36 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Another dumb question Steve, Baltic Birch is an interior grade plywood (the glue is not waterproof), and is NOT recommended for aircraft. The other consideration is that is mainly intended for finish applications - the interior plys may not be up to aircraft spec structurally. What ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DJ Vegh" <dj(at)veghdesign.com>
Subject: down in 230'
Date: Jan 15, 2007
wow! what fun today. Been practicing short field landings in our Taylorcraft. Today I managed down and stopped in 230' (see attached) Winds were ahead at 9kts. I wonder... a Piet/GN-1 should be able to do the same right?? For those flying, what's your shortest landing in your Piet and what were the winds? DJ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 15, 2007
From: Clif Dawson <CDAWSON5854(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: wet wood?
My choice for moving large object this way is 10 mil poly. It's 10 ft wide and you buy it in any length you want. Wrap the part in it with the seam on the "bottom" surface away from the rain. You'll have to plan that of course. :-) Tape up seams with lots of duct tape. The problem I see with the saran wrap idea is that there are multitudes of seams, each a potential leak. It doesn't always stick to itself as well as you would need. Now how would I know that? :-) The shrink wrap is a good one too. I like that. I think it just boils down to which you one guys think would be easier. Clif ----- Original Message ----- From: MICHAEL SILVIUS To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 3:58 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: wet wood? Donald: As for wrapping the thing with shipping grade saran wrap you'd likely be fine. Just be sure to wrap in the right direction so the wind don't blow it off. And we also have a lot of folks that do shrink wrapping of boats for winter storage. I am certain that if you were up for it you could get it shrink wrapped for the trip by one of the fellows that do that around here. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Isablcorky(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 15, 2007
Subject: Re: wet wood?
Here I go again after saying I never would again. May I suggest that you get up to Maine a few days earlier than planned put on a couple of coats of good spar varnish, 1st coat thinned then 2d coat full strength out of the can. I like Ace hardware gloss. Then you wouldn't have to wrap anything or worry about plastic flying. I'm thinking like a completed fuse of course. Just a thought but I bet that's the way I'd do it. Corky ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rcaprd(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 15, 2007
Subject: Re: tail brace fittings
In a message dated 1/15/2007 10:01:45 AM Central Standard Time, aadamson(at)wnmdag.org writes: Gentlemen, I have a simple question I=99d like your opinion on. Do you mount the wire brace fittings for the rudder and horizontal stabilizer under the covering a nd protruding through or on top of the covering? Does it even matter? What di d you do and/or what do you recommend? Any thoughts would be appreciated. Arden Arden, The tail wire brace fittings for the vertical and horizontal stabilizer, are Under the fabric. I used 3/16" iron rivets, called out in the plans, so it was a permanent install, before fabric. You need to have them installed whe n you pre-fit the empenage. Then you the parts, and cover the vert & horiz st abs, with just a slit for the fittings to protrude, then install a re-enforcing small round patch (about 3" diameter), slit for the protruding fitting, with the fibers running at about a 45=C2=BA to the covering, on top of the fabric. A llow the fabric to creep up on the fitting, and it makes for a nice clean looking , and waterproof install. You can see the fittings here, as well as how I set up the heel brakes, sealed hinge gaps, and means to jack the plane up http://nx770cg.com/Unique.html Chuck G. NX770CG ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Graham Hansen" <ghans@cable-lynx.net>
Subject: Re: tail brace fittings
Date: Jan 15, 2007
Arden, In general, early designs having a wooden structure (and the Pietenpol fits this category) have fittings placed outside the fabric covering. The DeHavilland Moths, among others, did it this way because: 1. Inspection of fittings is made easy. 2. Fabric covering is easier to accomplish. 3. It is easy to seal between the fabric and the fittings.* 4. Removal/replacement of fittings or bolts is facilitated. 5. You get a nice "antique" appearance. * Use a high quality marine sealant here. Covering the fittings with fabric is OK, but make sure no water can enter where the fitting emerges from the fabric. This can be difficult to accomplish for long term protection. I opted to place my fittings outside the fabric and tolerate the extra drag they produce. After all, what's a bit more drag to a Pietenpol? Graham Hansen (Pietenpol CF-AUN) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: tail brace fittings
Date: Jan 16, 2007
Just to chime in here, the tail brace fittings on NX41CC are mounted outside the fabric and I've been glad of it a time or two already. I had to remove the vertical stabilizer for repairs and it was my first time doing fabric covering. It was tricky learning to fit the fabric around protruding fittings (the Vi Kapler style rudder hinges in this case), and the fewer fittings I need to work fabric around, the better for me. I'm sure it presents a smoother finish to cover over them though. And after looking at Chuck Gantzer's link to his page, I remembered how slick his heel brake setup is. 41CC has toe brakes and they work fine, but that heel brake setup of Chuck's is nifty too. Higher parts count and more detail than the toe brake setup, I'll admit. Someone else sent me pictures of their heel brake setup (along with their trim wheel setup, using part of a bicycle chain with a nicely done wooden trim wheel) and that one, too, is really nice; it uses Matco masters in the laydown position along with short sections of tubing below the rudder bar to activate the brakes. Oscar Zuniga San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags(at)hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net _________________________________________________________________ >From photos to predictions, The MSN Entertainment Guide to Golden Globes has it all. http://tv.msn.com/tv/globes2007/?icid=nctagline1 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: wet wood?
Date: Jan 16, 2007
From: "Bill Church" <eng(at)canadianrogers.com>
I agree with Clif. I would wrap with polyethylene (vapour barrier), and seal ALL the seams. Water has a way of working through almost any opening, and if you have the misfortune of driving through a rainstorm, or even if the roads are wet, the water will get to places you don't want it to be. Since you're going to be driving across the continent, there's likely going to be some rain along the way. To seal the seams, I would use this stuff: http://www.can-save.ca/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=19 5&Ite mid=93 It really sticks, and is waterproof - much better than duct tape. Up here in Canada, we can buy it at building supply stores (Home Depot carries it) - not sure how available it is on your side of the border. Bill C ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 16, 2007
From: "Dave Case" <dav3xor(at)gmail.com>
Subject: No Space to Build.
Just to back up what's being said -- I'm making ribs in my dinette -- no problem at all. My wife always balks at the talk of "Oh, I'll hang the wings up from the ceiling; think of it as decoration!". Maybe I can get a shop built by then. :) Plus, it has it's advantages, I don't have to worry about temperature, but I do have to worry about drifts of sawdust in my kitchen. I just bought an electronic scale accurate to within 1/10th of a gram -- makes measuring T-88 braindead simple, and I can also measure dry ingredients (flower, sugar etc...) like the Europeans do. It's a MyWeigh i500, and cost me about $60. I always had a nagging fear in the back of my head that measuring T-88 by eye was a bad idea. Plus, how can you call it a real aircraft project if you don't make it on to some sort of Drug Enforcement Agency watch list? -- David Case Dav3xor(at)gmail.com www.builddiary.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 16, 2007
From: "Dave Case" <dav3xor(at)gmail.com>
Subject: More Measuring Epoxy...
Forgot to mention... it takes about 5 grams of resin per rib, and remember to multiply your weight of resin by .83 to get the amount of hardener to use. Results may vary. Do not attempt to operate a motor vehicle while mixing epoxy. Warning -- glue may attach objects together beyond your ability to break them apart again. It is advisable to take your gloves off before opening any doors. No matter how good it smells, please don't eat the hardener. -- David Case Dav3xor(at)gmail.com www.builddiary.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: More Measuring Epoxy...
Date: Jan 16, 2007
From: "Bill Church" <eng(at)canadianrogers.com>
I wonder what advantage, if any, one might gain by weighing epoxy components, rather than measuring the volume. I just used small disposable plastic graduated measuring cups. For each rib I measured 1/4 oz resin and added hardener, to make 1/2 oz of epoxy, which seems to be a good amount to do one rib - leaves a little (maybe 1/8 oz) in the bottom of the cup to save as a glue batch sample. I wrote the date on each cup and set them aside for safekeeping. I also numbered each rib assembly, so that if I found a glue sample to be not quite right, I could identify the rib built with that batch of glue. Bill C ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Ask Markle about the mustard
Date: Jan 16, 2007
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
I hate to bust a good builder from Texas but Jim Markle had a funny story about what not to eat one day....... and for what it's worth, I mixed all of my epoxy by eye. Two very similar diameter blobs of part A and part B and did glue joint tests with many batches along the way and nary at time when the joint didn't break where it should--in the wood. A good use for all of those cap strip pieces that you might normally throw away is to use them to test your glue batches from time to time. A sharp FAA or DAR inspector might even ask you to produce to a few (dated is best, with a pencil or marker) I used to dab two offset overlapping joints, let them cure then clamp one end in a vise and hit the other end/piece with a hammer and see where the joint would break. Mike C. (PS-- white vinegar on a paper towel works good for removing T-88 from tools, hands, hair, and makes you smell like a cucumber salad somewhat) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 16, 2007
From: "walt evans" <waltdak(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: No Space to Build.
I built my Pietenpol in a 10x20ft basement. Where there's a wil,,,,blah, blah. PS did have to take a piece of the foundation out to get the wings out walt evans NX140DL "Put your wealth in knowledge, and no one can ever take it from you" Ben Franklin ----- Original Message ----- From: Dave Case To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 1:36 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: No Space to Build. Just to back up what's being said -- I'm making ribs in my dinette -- no problem at all. My wife always balks at the talk of "Oh, I'll hang the wings up from the ceiling; think of it as decoration!". Maybe I can get a shop built by then. :) Plus, it has it's advantages, I don't have to worry about temperature, but I do have to worry about drifts of sawdust in my kitchen. I just bought an electronic scale accurate to within 1/10th of a gram -- makes measuring T-88 braindead simple, and I can also measure dry ingredients (flower, sugar etc...) like the Europeans do. It's a MyWeigh i500, and cost me about $60. I always had a nagging fear in the back of my head that measuring T-88 by eye was a bad idea. Plus, how can you call it a real aircraft project if you don't make it on to some sort of Drug Enforcement Agency watch list? -- David Case Dav3xor(at)gmail.com www.builddiary.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Greg Bacon" <gbacon67(at)hughes.net>
Subject: Syringes and measuring epoxy
Date: Jan 16, 2007
Just a tip I thought I'd share with the list: I fill two 10cc syringes, one with resin and one with hardener. I can then dispense various amounts of each part. If I have a small job, I may only dispense 2cc of each, leaving the rest in the syringes. For a bigger job I might use 4cc of each. This ensures a very close volumetric mix of both parts and you can quickly dispense the amount you need. BTW, T-88 is formulated to be mixed 1:1 by VOLUME. My 2 cents anyway. Greg Bacon Prairie Home, MO ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Singleton" <slsingleton(at)cvalley.net>
Subject: Re: Congratulations Gene Hubbard
Date: Jan 16, 2007
Doug-I had some wood in my house attic for a few years and when i went to use it it had dried out so much in the hot attic that the wood was no good to use. I hope you the best on your Piet. I just getting started also. Steve Singleton Hale MO ----- Original Message ----- From: DOUGLAS BLACKBURN To: Pietenpol List Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 12:45 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Congratulations Gene Hubbard Good job Gene!!!!! I have been down to see Gene a few times over the years. He even loaned me his rib jig to many years ago. I have to say I have been the proverbial bump on a log, and I'd say it is time to get off that log and pull my head out and get to building. Even though Gene loaned me his jig, It appears to be a better deal to build your own from what I have been reading in the archives this evening. I have the cap-strip for the ribs, the wood for the tail group, and all the wood for the fuse in the attic above the garage. I suppose this list is making me accountable so to speak for getting this project on the road. I hope my questions over the next few years don't become too much for you guys. No more excuses either. Tomorrow I will pick up a board to build the rib jig. Gene I will return yours as soon as it fits into yours and mines schedule. Email me off list and we will work that out. My wife has had many health problems and I suppose I have been hiding behind that in a way. He rproblems continue, but it is time for me to move forward with this dream of mine to build a plane. I hope to learn as much, and be able to teach as much some day to someone else, in the way you all teach each other. I'll get off the soapbox now, I need to find a place to build a website, and start the progress logs. Thanks, you'll be hearing from me. Doug Blackburn Yucaipa California p.s. Carl Levken, drop me a line.............. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 17, 2007
From: santiago morete <moretesantiago(at)yahoo.com.ar>
Subject: Jenny landing gear & ash cross member
I am building the jenny style landing gear and since there are no ash cross members in the F&GM for this type of gear, I am wondering if it is really necesary. As far as I know, most of you use them anyway, but there is a reason? I hope that my english has been sufficiently clear . Thanks to all. Santiago --------------------------------- Pregunt. Respond. Descubr. Todo lo que queras saber, y lo que ni imaginabas, est en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta). ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: down in 230'
Date: Jan 16, 2007
From: "Steve Eldredge" <steve(at)byu.edu>
About 20' ground roll once in the piet. It was downright scary. I didn't dare turn off the runway for fear I would flip. Winds were about 35kts down the runway after I diverted to the larger metro apt. with a crosswind runway. I somehow got it to a tie down and left it there for the weekend. I haven't landed backwards yet though. My personal record for TO/Landings is 5 without a pattern on our 5900' strip. Take off, climb to 100' and land straight ahead full stop, without turning as many times as you can before running out of runway. Silly headwind piet tricks. Steve E -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of DJ Vegh Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 6:02 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: down in 230' wow! what fun today. Been practicing short field landings in our Taylorcraft. Today I managed down and stopped in 230' (see attached) Winds were ahead at 9kts. I wonder... a Piet/GN-1 should be able to do the same right?? For those flying, what's your shortest landing in your Piet and what were the winds? DJ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "gcardinal" <gcardinal(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Jenny landing gear & ash cross member
Date: Jan 17, 2007
Hi Santiago, Yes, the ash cross members are necessary. They stiffen and reinforce the plywood floor between the gear leg attach points. The metal strap addition is a good idea also. Greg C. ----- Original Message ----- From: santiago morete To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 10:02 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Jenny landing gear & ash cross member I am building the jenny style landing gear and since there are no ash cross members in the F&GM for this type of gear, I am wondering if it is really necesary. As far as I know, most of you use them anyway, but there is a reason? I hope that my english has been sufficiently clear . Thanks to all. Santiago ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Pregunt=E1. Respond=E9. Descubr=ED. Todo lo que quer=EDas saber, y lo que ni imaginabas, est=E1 en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta). ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "gcardinal" <gcardinal(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: down in 230'
Date: Jan 17, 2007
I can't beat 20' but I did have a ground roll of less than 100' in a 20kt wind straight down the runway. Even in windless conditions the ground roll is only a few hundred feet. This is in NX18235 which is brakeless. Greg Cardinal ----- Original Message ----- > > About 20' ground roll once in the piet. It was downright scary. I didn't > dare turn off the runway for fear I would flip. Winds were about 35kts > down the runway after I diverted to the larger metro apt. with a crosswind > runway. I somehow got it to a tie down and left it there for the weekend. > I haven't landed backwards yet though. My personal record for TO/Landings > is 5 without a pattern on our 5900' strip. Take off, climb to 100' and > land straight ahead full stop, without turning as many times as you can > before running out of runway. Silly headwind piet tricks. > > > Steve E > > > > server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of DJ Vegh > > Subject: Pietenpol-List: down in 230' > > wow! what fun today. Been practicing short field landings in our > Taylorcraft. Today I managed down and stopped in 230' (see attached) > Winds were ahead at 9kts. I wonder... a Piet/GN-1 should be able to do > the same right?? For those flying, what's your shortest landing in your > Piet and what were the winds? > > DJ > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: down in 230'
Date: Jan 17, 2007
From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com>
I think my shortest landing was at Oshkosh in 2005. I had flown from Brodhead on Sunday morning and landed on runway 18. Winds were 250 at 20 kts, gusts to 25 (remember the winds that morning, Chuck?). I didn't measure it (are you kidding - this is OSHKOSH!), but I touched down just in front of the big painted dot on the end of the runway and stopped rolling just on the other side of the dot. I think it was well under 200'. I was just glad to get it down safe in such a crosswind, never mind in front of such a crowd of highly critical spectators. It sure wasn't the softest landing I've ever made, but it was the shortest. The so-called "RV Grin" was nothing compared to the grin I had that day. Jack Phillips NX899JP -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of DJ Vegh Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 8:02 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: down in 230' wow! what fun today. Been practicing short field landings in our Taylorcraft. Today I managed down and stopped in 230' (see attached) Winds were ahead at 9kts. I wonder... a Piet/GN-1 should be able to do the same right?? For those flying, what's your shortest landing in your Piet and what were the winds? DJ _________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Date: Jan 17, 2007
I'm looking into buying another prop for my A-65 powered Piet. Does anyone have any knowledge of Cloudcars or Tennessee props and how well or how poorly they perform Also would be interested in anyones opinion of any other props (good or bad) they have used. Thank You Gene ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Date: Jan 17, 2007
From: <harvey.rule(at)bell.ca>
I'm using a Tennessee prop 72X42 on my 80hp Franklin and it seems to be performing fine.I've only got two hours on it so far. ________________________________ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Gene and Tammy Sent: January 17, 2007 9:00 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers I'm looking into buying another prop for my A-65 powered Piet. Does anyone have any knowledge of Cloudcars or Tennessee props and how well or how poorly they perform Also would be interested in anyones opinion of any other props (good or bad) they have used. Thank You Gene ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Roman Bukolt" <conceptmodels(at)tds.net>
Subject: Re: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Date: Jan 17, 2007
I have a Sturba wood prop 72 x 42 on my Piet, total gross at 1223 lbs. with two people and 15 gal. fuel, which climbs well and cruises at 80mph at 2150rpm. iI'm quite satisfied with its performance. Roman Bukolt NX20795 ----- Original Message ----- From: Gene and Tammy To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 8:00 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers I'm looking into buying another prop for my A-65 powered Piet. Does anyone have any knowledge of Cloudcars or Tennessee props and how well or how poorly they perform Also would be interested in anyones opinion of any other props (good or bad) they have used. Thank You Gene ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Date: Jan 17, 2007
Roman, Thnks for your reply. Which engine do you have? Do you remember what you gave for the prop? I've heard of the Sturba prop but am not familiar with it. Do you have a phone # or address? Thank You Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: Roman Bukolt To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 8:56 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers I have a Sturba wood prop 72 x 42 on my Piet, total gross at 1223 lbs. with two people and 15 gal. fuel, which climbs well and cruises at 80mph at 2150rpm. iI'm quite satisfied with its performance. Roman Bukolt NX20795 ----- Original Message ----- From: Gene and Tammy To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 8:00 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers I'm looking into buying another prop for my A-65 powered Piet. Does anyone have any knowledge of Cloudcars or Tennessee props and how well or how poorly they perform Also would be interested in anyones opinion of any other props (good or bad) they have used. Thank You Gene href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Date: Jan 17, 2007
Harvey, Thanks for your reply. Do you happen to know how much your 72X42 Tennesse Prop weighed? I'm going to be replacing a metal prop and I'm a little concerned about the weight difference. Have thought about adding a battery in the engine compartment to off set the difference. Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: harvey.rule(at)bell.ca To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 8:50 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers I'm using a Tennessee prop 72X42 on my 80hp Franklin and it seems to be performing fine.I've only got two hours on it so far. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DJ Vegh" <dj(at)veghdesign.com>
Subject: Re: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Date: Jan 17, 2007
I've 14 hours of ground run time on my Tennesee 66x29. It's a well made prop. One of the only propr makers that I know of that use 1/16" laminations. There are 48 laminations on my prop and it's very sturdy and tracks dead on. DJ ----- Original Message ----- From: harvey.rule(at)bell.ca To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 7:50 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers I'm using a Tennessee prop 72X42 on my 80hp Franklin and it seems to be performing fine.I've only got two hours on it so far. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Gene and Tammy Sent: January 17, 2007 9:00 AM To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers I'm looking into buying another prop for my A-65 powered Piet. Does anyone have any knowledge of Cloudcars or Tennessee props and how well or how poorly they perform Also would be interested in anyones opinion of any other props (good or bad) they have used. Thank You Gene ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Date: Jan 17, 2007
DJ, Thanks for the info on the Tennessee. I've always liked the ultralite props that Tennessee makes but have not seen any of the props they make for GA.. Well worth looking into. What motor are you running the 66X29 on? Gene----- Original Message ----- From: DJ Vegh To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:24 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers I've 14 hours of ground run time on my Tennesee 66x29. It's a well made prop. One of the only propr makers that I know of that use 1/16" laminations. There are 48 laminations on my prop and it's very sturdy and tracks dead on. DJ href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <harvey.rule(at)sympatico.ca>
Subject: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Date: Jan 17, 2007
>From: <harvey.rule(at)bell.ca> >To: >Subject: FW: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers >Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:52:00 -0500 > > >________________________________ > >From: Rule, Harvey G (N092740) >Sent: January 17, 2007 11:48 AM >To: 'pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com' >Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee >propellers > > >I don't know how much it weighed but I took a metal prop off and >replaced it with the wood prop and the weight difference of the two >props was quite substantial.I also took off an adaptor plate which >weighed a lot as well.I put my battery in the front seat (bolted in with >a battery box).I was able to put my started back on with the weight I >took off.Tennessee props could give you the exact answer to the weight >question.I will say that the prop I received from them is a work of >art.I paid 650$ for it and it's worth every penny.I get about 80 -85 mph >out of her and I'm hoping to make that 90 mph in the spring. > > >________________________________ > >From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com >[mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Gene and >Tammy >Sent: January 17, 2007 10:16 AM >To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee >propellers > > >Harvey, > >Thanks for your reply. Do you happen to know how much your 72X42 >Tennesse Prop weighed? I'm going to be replacing a metal prop and I'm a >little concerned about the weight difference. Have thought about adding >a battery in the engine compartment to off set the difference. > >Gene > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: harvey.rule(at)bell.ca > > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 8:50 AM > > Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee >propellers > > > I'm using a Tennessee prop 72X42 on my 80hp Franklin and it >seems to be performing fine.I've only got two hours on it so far. > > >________________________________ > > >href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.matr >onics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DJ Vegh" <dj(at)veghdesign.com>
Subject: Re: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Date: Jan 17, 2007
mine is mounted to a 100hp Corvair ----- Original Message ----- From: Gene and Tammy To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:46 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers DJ, Thanks for the info on the Tennessee. I've always liked the ultralite props that Tennessee makes but have not seen any of the props they make for GA.. Well worth looking into. What motor are you running the 66X29 on? Gene----- Original Message ----- From: DJ Vegh To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:24 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers I've 14 hours of ground run time on my Tennesee 66x29. It's a well made prop. One of the only propr makers that I know of that use 1/16" laminations. There are 48 laminations on my prop and it's very sturdy and tracks dead on. DJ href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HVandervoo(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 17, 2007
Subject: Re: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Gene, I use a Tennessee prop, 64 x 34 on my Corvair powered Piet. It is a well made prop, I have the urethane leading edge option. The prop is excellently balanced and performs well, I have about 40 hours on it and it show little wear, I fly from grass. I would definitely buy from Tennessee prop again Hans ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HelsperSew(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 17, 2007
Subject: Re: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Hans, You said you had the urethane leading edge on your prop. Have you ever flown through rain, and if so, how did it hold up? Dan Helsper Poplar Grove, IL. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <harvey.rule(at)sympatico.ca>
Subject: Re: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Date: Jan 17, 2007
I forgot ,I have the urethane leading edge on mine as well.After a flight I just spray a light mixture of dish washing soap and water on it and wipe the bugs off.Looks like new all the time.I have attached a picture of what it looks like on the aircraft. >From: HVandervoo(at)aol.com >Reply-To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers >Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:44:25 EST > >Gene, > >I use a Tennessee prop, 64 x 34 on my Corvair powered Piet. >It is a well made prop, I have the urethane leading edge option. > >The prop is excellently balanced and performs well, >I have about 40 hours on it and it show little wear, I fly from grass. > >I would definitely buy from Tennessee prop again > >Hans ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Roman Bukolt" <conceptmodels(at)tds.net>
Subject: Re: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Date: Jan 17, 2007
The engine is a Continental A-65. The prop was on the plane when I bought it last Oct. but it was bought in 2004 and i can probably find out from the previous owner. ----- Original Message ----- From: Gene and Tammy To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:05 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers Roman, Thnks for your reply. Which engine do you have? Do you remember what you gave for the prop? I've heard of the Sturba prop but am not familiar with it. Do you have a phone # or address? Thank You Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: Roman Bukolt To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 8:56 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers I have a Sturba wood prop 72 x 42 on my Piet, total gross at 1223 lbs. with two people and 15 gal. fuel, which climbs well and cruises at 80mph at 2150rpm. iI'm quite satisfied with its performance. Roman Bukolt NX20795 ----- Original Message ----- From: Gene and Tammy To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 8:00 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers I'm looking into buying another prop for my A-65 powered Piet. Does anyone have any knowledge of Cloudcars or Tennessee props and how well or how poorly they perform Also would be interested in anyones opinion of any other props (good or bad) they have used. Thank You Gene href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Date: Jan 17, 2007
From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com>
I've got a certified Sensenich 72 x 42 and I'm not all that happy with it. On the way back from OSH in 2005, I flew through some pretty heavy rain (got myself soaked). The rain knocked all the varnish off the brass leading edge, although the varnish on the wood itself seemed to hold up alright. I don't think it is pitched right for a Pietenpol climb prop as I can't get full redline RPM in level flight at full throttle. I've got a St. Croix that is 74 x 36 that I want to try this spring, to see if I can get a little better climb. Jack Phillips NX899JP -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of HVandervoo(at)aol.com Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 12:44 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers Gene, I use a Tennessee prop, 64 x 34 on my Corvair powered Piet. It is a well made prop, I have the urethane leading edge option. The prop is excellently balanced and performs well, I have about 40 hours on it and it show little wear, I fly from grass. I would definitely buy from Tennessee prop again Hans _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilege d, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it i n error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 17, 2007
From: KMHeide <kmheidecpo(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Gene, I do not know much about props but can tell you my experience with Tennessee Props. I ordered one for my Challenger Ultralight some 9 years ago. Upon receiving it, I tested it for balance and found it to be near perfect! Having said that, of the other 5-8 challenger operators whom had the same prop, none were even close to being balanced. As I recalled, the blade would drop quite fast to the bottom of our balance rod. Many people sanded their until close to balance and then re-coated them. I eventually ordered the Warp Drive three blade ground adjustable for less noise and better performance. Again....just my 2 pennies worth. I hope they have improved since then.... Ken H Fargo Pietenpol Association (FPA) Gene and Tammy wrote: I'm looking into buying another prop for my A-65 powered Piet. Does anyone have any knowledge of Cloudcars or Tennessee props and how well or how poorly they perform Also would be interested in anyones opinion of any other props (good or bad) they have used. Thank You Gene --------------------------------- Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dick Navratil" <horzpool(at)goldengate.net>
Subject: Re: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Date: Jan 17, 2007
I'm with you on that, Jack. A couple of weeks ago in discussion, someone had much better climb performance with the same engine. It would be worth the change if we could climb out better. Dick N. ----- Original Message ----- From: Phillips, Jack To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 11:55 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers I've got a certified Sensenich 72 x 42 and I'm not all that happy with it. On the way back from OSH in 2005, I flew through some pretty heavy rain (got myself soaked). The rain knocked all the varnish off the brass leading edge, although the varnish on the wood itself seemed to hold up alright. I don't think it is pitched right for a Pietenpol climb prop as I can't get full redline RPM in level flight at full throttle. I've got a St. Croix that is 74 x 36 that I want to try this spring, to see if I can get a little better climb. Jack Phillips NX899JP http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listhttp://forums.matronics. com _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Date: Jan 18, 2007
Once again, Thanks everyone for all of the good input. As I understand it, what may work well from one prop maker will not necessarily work well from another. I have been told by one prop maker that he thought 74X38 would be the best all around prop for the 65 Piet. Anyone use this prop? Gene N502R Tennessee ----- Original Message ----- From: Dick Navratil To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:16 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers I'm with you on that, Jack. A couple of weeks ago in discussion, someone had much better climb performance with the same engine. It would be worth the change if we could climb out better. Dick N. ----- Original Message ----- From: Phillips, Jack To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 11:55 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers I've got a certified Sensenich 72 x 42 and I'm not all that happy with it. On the way back from OSH in 2005, I flew through some pretty heavy rain (got myself soaked). The rain knocked all the varnish off the brass leading edge, although the varnish on the wood itself seemed to hold up alright. I don't think it is pitched right for a Pietenpol climb prop as I can't get full redline RPM in level flight at full throttle. I've got a St. Croix that is 74 x 36 that I want to try this spring, to see if I can get a little better climb. Jack Phillips NX899JP http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listhttp://forums.matronics. com _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Date: Jan 18, 2007
From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com>
As I said in an earlier post, I've got a St. Croix that is 74 x 36 and was supposedly designed for a Pietenpol, as a climb prop. I have not flown it yet, but will do so this spring. Jack Phillips Raleigh, NC - where it is currently snowing on top of the sleet we got last night. -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Gene and Tammy Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 9:02 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers Once again, Thanks everyone for all of the good input. As I understand it, what may work well from one prop maker will not necessarily work well from another. I have been told by one prop maker that he thought 74X38 would be the best all around prop for the 65 Piet. Anyone use this prop? Gene N502R Tennessee ----- Original Message ----- From: Dick Navratil <mailto:horzpool(at)goldengate.net> To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:16 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers I'm with you on that, Jack. A couple of weeks ago in discussion, someone had much better climb performance with the same engine. It would be worth the change if we could climb out better. Dick N. ----- Original Message ----- From: Phillips, Jack <mailto:Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com> To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 11:55 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers I've got a certified Sensenich 72 x 42 and I'm not all that happy with it. On the way back from OSH in 2005, I flew through some pretty heavy rain (got myself soaked). The rain knocked all the varnish off the brass leading edge, although the varnish on the wood itself seemed to hold up alright. I don't think it is pitched right for a Pietenpol climb prop as I can't get full redline RPM in level flight at full throttle. I've got a St. Croix that is 74 x 36 that I want to try this spring, to see if I can get a little better climb. Jack Phillips NX899JP http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List> http://forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com> _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.matr onics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.matr onics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilege d, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it i n error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Date: Jan 18, 2007
From: hvandervoo(at)aol.com
Dan, Only once and for a short time, less than 5 minutes. No noticeable difference on the prop. Not fun in a open cockpit Piet. Did make some landings in high grass, where the prop acted as a weed-wacker. I must state I clean my prop after most flights and frequently wax the prop. The wax (TURTLE WAX) helps in removing bugs and grass stains. Hans -----Original Message----- From: HelsperSew(at)aol.com Sent: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:58 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers Hans, You said you had the urethane leading edge on your prop. Have you ever flown through rain, and if so, how did it hold up? Dan Helsper Poplar Grove, IL. ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Date: Jan 18, 2007
I didn't realize your 74 X 36 was made for a Piet. Where can I get information on the St Croix? Haven't heard of them before. If you were a dedicated mentor you'd say "Damn the snow and rain, I'm going to put that prop on today and fly it so Gene will know if he should order one." Corky would do that, wouldn't you Corky. As a side note, I fould Ed Sterba's phone number and I'm giving him a call today as well as Tennessee Props. Gene PS I'll spend the day waiting for your report on how well your St Croix does. ----- Original Message ----- From: Phillips, Jack To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 8:09 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers As I said in an earlier post, I've got a St. Croix that is 74 x 36 and was supposedly designed for a Pietenpol, as a climb prop. I have not flown it yet, but will do so this spring. Jack Phillips Raleigh, NC - where it is currently snowing on top of the sleet we got last night. ----- Original Message ----- From: Dick Navratil To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:16 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers I'm with you on that, Jack. A couple of weeks ago in discussion, someone had much better climb performance with the same engine. It would be worth the change if we could climb out better. Dick N. ----- Original Message ----- From: Phillips, Jack To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 11:55 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers I've got a certified Sensenich 72 x 42 and I'm not all that happy with it. On the way back from OSH in 2005, I flew through some pretty heavy rain (got myself soaked). The rain knocked all the varnish off the brass leading edge, although the varnish on the wood itself seemed to hold up alright. I don't think it is pitched right for a Pietenpol climb prop as I can't get full redline RPM in level flight at full throttle. I've got a St. Croix that is 74 x 36 that I want to try this spring, to see if I can get a little better climb. Jack Phillips NX899JP http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listhttp://forums.matronics. com _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listhref="http://forums.matronics.com">h ttp://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listhref="http://forums.matronics.com">h ttp://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listhttp://forums.matronics. com _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dave Abramson" <davea(at)symbolicdisplays.com>
Subject: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Date: Jan 18, 2007
The Phone # for St Croix Aircraft 1-641-322-4041 Chad Wille is the man!!!!!!! -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Gene and Tammy Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 7:11 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers I didn't realize your 74 X 36 was made for a Piet. Where can I get information on the St Croix? Haven't heard of them before. If you were a dedicated mentor you'd say "Damn the snow and rain, I'm going to put that prop on today and fly it so Gene will know if he should order one." Corky would do that, wouldn't you Corky. As a side note, I fould Ed Sterba's phone number and I'm giving him a call today as well as Tennessee Props. Gene PS I'll spend the day waiting for your report on how well your St Croix does. ----- Original Message ----- From: Phillips, Jack <mailto:Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 8:09 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers As I said in an earlier post, I've got a St. Croix that is 74 x 36 and was supposedly designed for a Pietenpol, as a climb prop. I have not flown it yet, but will do so this spring. Jack Phillips Raleigh, NC - where it is currently snowing on top of the sleet we got last night. ----- Original Message ----- From: Dick Navratil <mailto:horzpool(at)goldengate.net> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:16 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers I'm with you on that, Jack. A couple of weeks ago in discussion, someone had much better climb performance with the same engine. It would be worth the change if we could climb out better. Dick N. ----- Original Message ----- From: Phillips, Jack <mailto:Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 11:55 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers I've got a certified Sensenich 72 x 42 and I'm not all that happy with it. On the way back from OSH in 2005, I flew through some pretty heavy rain (got myself soaked). The rain knocked all the varnish off the brass leading edge, although the varnish on the wood itself seemed to hold up alright. I don't think it is pitched right for a Pietenpol climb prop as I can't get full redline RPM in level flight at full throttle. I've got a St. Croix that is 74 x 36 that I want to try this spring, to see if I can get a little better climb. Jack Phillips NX899JP http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List> http://forums.matronics.com _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.matronic s.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.matronic s.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List http://forums.matronics.com _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.matronic s.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Date: Jan 18, 2007
Dave, Thank you for the phone #. I'll give Chad a call. --- Original Message ----- From: Dave Abramson To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:12 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers The Phone # for St Croix Aircraft 1-641-322-4041 Chad Wille is the man!!!!!!! http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List http://forums.matronics.com _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listhref="http://forums.matronics.com">h ttp://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listhref="http://forums.matronics.com">h ttp://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listhttp://forums.matronics. com _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listhref="http://forums.matronics.com">h ttp://forums.matronics.com - The Pietenpol-List Email Forum - --> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List - NEW MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - --> http://forums.matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: TBYH(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 18, 2007
Subject: Brake calipers, slow flight
Question: I asked this once before but don't recall what the responses were -- what would you all recommend for disk brake calipers. I see that at the bottom end there are Manco mechanically actuated calipers that are very inexpensive and from there calipers go up to more than $100 for juice actuated brakes. Let me know your thoughts -- I've got the Jenny-style landing gear. Speaking of slow flight -- way back in 1978 I learned to fly in a 150-HP SuperCub. The day of my flight exam it was cold and rather windy but we went out anyway. The winds aloft were even stronger straight out of the Northwest, gusting to 35 mph...while demonstrating slow flight the examiner had me head into that northwesterly wind because he wanted to see if we could go backwards. I had it slowed down just hanging on the prop and edge of a stall until we almost did creep backwards over the ground! We sure weren't moving ahead! The FBO sold the Cub not long after that -- always loved that airplane and I was told by the FBO owner that I was the first person to get a private ticket in a tailwheel airplane at the La Crosse airport in nearly 20 years. The SuperCub sure wasn't fast, but she'd sure get off the ground quick. Never used the flaps either, preferring to slip her in -- great fun! In fact, my instructor had neglected to teach me about the flaps and the first time I used them was on that check ride! Enough rambling --let me know your thoughts on brake calipers...Many thanks! Fred Beseler La Crosse, WI _TBYH(at)aol.com_ (mailto:TBYH(at)aol.com) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom Stinemetze" <tstinemetze(at)cox.net>
Subject: RE: Short Landings
Date: Jan 18, 2007
Just so the list members won't think that I died or gave up on my Pietenpol project since you haven't heard from me for about 6-months - just a word of update. I have not been building since I haven't the funds or time to build at the same time that I am taking flying lessons. Well, that's about to change as I passed my Private Pilot check ride about two hours ago. Winds 18 kts gusting to 25 - WHAT WAS I THINKING? Well, it was either do it today or wait and see what the next ice storm / blizzard / "winter mix" has in store for us this weekend. I want to hear all your "ho humm" stories about how easy your check ride was. Back to the Workshop for me! Tom Stinemetze McPherson, KS ____ | ____ \8/ / \ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: passed your checkride !
Date: Jan 18, 2007
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Way to go Tom Stinemetze on passing your private checkride and letting us know !!!! Sure is more fun to build a Piet if you know you are qualified to fly it when you're done. Excellent. I half think that you have a better chance of passing a checkride on a rough day since you have to prove you can handle the plane in adverse conditions---and you did ! Loved my checkride in 1981. WWII veteran. Instructor from Kent State University named Dick Schwabe. He flew more of the checkride than I did because he rarely got time in much else than 150's and I showed up in a Grumman AA-1B. Still a rough, windy day and despite my flaws, he passed me. Mike C. PS-- you'll sleep good tonight ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jdavis2a(at)wmconnect.com
Date: Jan 18, 2007
Subject: Re: RE: Short Landings
CONGRATS!!!!!! from Tulsa ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Brake calipers, slow flight
Date: Jan 18, 2007
From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com>
Fred, I've got regular Cleveland 8" discs on mine. Got 'em on ebay for $25. The pads were worn and had to be replaced (okay, add another $22 to the cost) but they work fine. Any less brake and I wouldn't be able to hold it for a runup. I've got the Jenny style gear and 21" wheels. Those big wheels are mighty hard to stop. Airplanes quit using big wheels about the time they started using brakes. Jack Phillips Snow has stopped in Raleigh. Now it's just foggy. And COLD -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of TBYH(at)aol.com Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:38 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Brake calipers, slow flight Question: I asked this once before but don't recall what the responses were -- what would you all recommend for disk brake calipers. I see that at the bottom end there are Manco mechanically actuated calipers that are very inexpensive and from there calipers go up to more than $100 for juice actuated brakes. Let me know your thoughts -- I've got the Jenny-style landing gear. Speaking of slow flight -- way back in 1978 I learned to fly in a 150-HP SuperCub. The day of my flight exam it was cold and rather windy but we went out anyway. The winds aloft were even stronger straight out of the Northwest, gusting to 35 mph...while demonstrating slow flight the examiner had me head into that northwesterly wind because he wanted to see if we could go backwards. I had it slowed down just hanging on the prop and edge of a stall until we almost did creep backwards over the ground! We sure weren't moving ahead! The FBO sold the Cub not long after that -- always loved that airplane and I was told by the FBO owner that I was the first person to get a private ticket in a tailwheel airplane at the La Crosse airport in nearly 20 years. The SuperCub sure wasn't fast, but she'd sure get off the ground quick. Never used the flaps either, preferring to slip her in -- great fun! In fact, my instructor had neglected to teach me about the flaps and the first time I used them was on that check ride! Enough rambling --let me know your thoughts on brake calipers...Many thanks! Fred Beseler La Crosse, WI TBYH(at)aol.com _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilege d, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it i n error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: brake calipers
Date: Jan 18, 2007
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Fred, I purchased Comet brake calipers at a local lawnmower/ go-kart shop http://www.hoffcocomet.com/comet/aftermarket-brakes.asp (scroll down when you get there) and traded aerial photos of a machinist friend's home for him to turn some rotors that fit my wheel hubs. My wheels are 19" and my rotors are 6" in diameter and the Comet DC Series caliper just hold me for run-up and no more---which works out fine. As you've seen my plane at Brodhead, I made up heel brakes ala Cub/Champ and actuate the calipers with 1/16" cable. Lots of ATV brakes out there too now which I'm sure would be worth looking into depending on what suites you. Mike C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Brake calipers, slow flight
Date: Jan 18, 2007
OK, OK, Guess the fog lets you out of the propeller trial. Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: Phillips, Jack To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 3:27 PM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Brake calipers, slow flight Fred, I've got regular Cleveland 8" discs on mine. Got 'em on ebay for $25. The pads were worn and had to be replaced (okay, add another $22 to the cost) but they work fine. Any less brake and I wouldn't be able to hold it for a runup. I've got the Jenny style gear and 21" wheels. Those big wheels are mighty hard to stop. Airplanes quit using big wheels about the time they started using brakes. Jack Phillips Snow has stopped in Raleigh. Now it's just foggy. And COLD ttp://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List .com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Singleton" <slsingleton(at)cvalley.net>
Subject: Re: RE: Short Landings
Date: Jan 18, 2007
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Stinemetze" <tstinemetze(at)cox.net> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 1:56 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: RE: Short Landings > > > Just so the list members won't think that I died or gave up on my > Pietenpol project since you haven't heard from me for about 6-months - > just a word of update. I have not been building since I haven't the > funds or time to build at the same time that I am taking flying lessons. > Well, that's about to change as I passed my Private Pilot check ride > about two hours ago. Winds 18 kts gusting to 25 - WHAT WAS I THINKING? > Well, it was either do it today or wait and see what the next ice storm > / blizzard / "winter mix" has in store for us this weekend. I want to > hear all your "ho humm" stories about how easy your check ride was. > > Back to the Workshop for me! > > Tom Stinemetze > McPherson, KS > > ____ | ____ > \8/ > / \ > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Singleton" <slsingleton(at)cvalley.net>
Subject: Re: RE: Short Landings
Date: Jan 18, 2007
Congradulations Tom! Happy for you. Steve Singleton ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Stinemetze" <tstinemetze(at)cox.net> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 1:56 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: RE: Short Landings > > > Just so the list members won't think that I died or gave up on my > Pietenpol project since you haven't heard from me for about 6-months - > just a word of update. I ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: passed your checkride!
Date: Jan 18, 2007
There is only one time in your life when you will pass your private pilot checkride, Tom, so savor the moment. I remember mine like it was yesterday. Andy Anderson, old-time instructor at David Wayne Hooks Memorial field outside of Houston, TX- gave me my checkride. Smooth and strong as an old hickory walking stick was old Andy, skin was the color of walnut and just as sturdy. I took my ride in a Piper Warrior that I knew inside and out and it went great. Andy pulled the old "darn... these old fingers... I dropped my pencil down there by the flap handle. Would you reach and get it while I try to fold this sectional, please?" while he put the airplane in an unusual attitude and messed up my inner ear. No problem; I recovered it and we moved on. He put me through the paces and I wanted him to. I wanted to please that examiner more than anything else in the world. He was my golden gate to my flying future and I wanted his name in my logbook that day. I wanted to show him that I knew how to fly an airplane. When we landed and he signed me off (he never really said I'd passed until he had signed me off), he told me that he used to be a Navy basic training instructor during the war and that he had sent boys younger than me off to fly fighters and bombers in a war, with fewer hours than I had in my logbook, and we're not talking about Piper Warriors either. Don't sell yourself short... the human mind and body can learn and perform things far more complex than flying a single-engine light aircraft with much less training than we receive, especially when we're doing something that we fervently enjoy and want to excel at. Now you have your ticket to learn. I found out that these old airplanes are good teachers, too ;o) Now follow me off my wing as I fly 41CC through that big field with the trees alongside it up ahead. The space between the trees and the fencerow is plenty wide enough to clear our wingtips. Smoke on and down onto the deck!!! Oscar Zuniga San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags(at)hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net _________________________________________________________________ The MSN Entertainment Guide to Golden Globes is here. Get all the scoop. http://tv.msn.com/tv/globes2007/?icid=nctagline2 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rcaprd(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 19, 2007
Subject: Re: down in 230'
In a message dated 1/17/2007 7:02:18 AM Central Standard Time, Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com writes: Winds were 250 at 20 kts, gusts to 25 (remember the winds that morning, Chuck?). Ah yes, Jack, I remember that morning well. Brodhead '05, and you took off shortly before I did, en route to that other show up north. You must have stayed low on that leg, because the winds at 3000' msl where I was, were quite different. I don't really know why I climbed that high...I think I just wanted to see more of the beautiful Wisconsin countryside from the higher altitude. I got about 15 miles to the north of Brodhead, trying to track to the North, but the strong winds out of the West caused the nose of my plane to point almost directly West !! I had almost full power in, and was indicating just over 75 mph, and according to my GPS, I had about 15 mph. ground speed. At one point, I noticed a tower to the North, between the right struts a couple of miles away. Five minutes later that tower was still in the same place...10 minutes later, still there...15 minutes later that tower didn't change location !! I've never been in that situation before, where I'm trying to track north, heading west, with almost full power in and getting nowhere. It was a strange feeling. I decided to abort the leg to Oshkosh, and headed back to Brodhead. For a while, I wasn't sure that I could even make it back, till I dropped to a much lower altitude where the winds weren't quite as strong. I finally made it back to Brodhead, and rode up to Oshkosh with Dennis & Kathy E. We had a great time there, but I never could find Jack. Chuck G. NX770CG ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rcaprd(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 19, 2007
Subject: Re: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
In a message dated 1/18/2007 8:13:15 AM Central Standard Time, Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com writes: As I said in an earlier post, I=99ve got a St. Croix that is 74 x 36 a nd was supposedly designed for a Pietenpol, as a climb prop. I have not flown it y et, but will do so this spring. Jack, I'm very interested in how the 74 X 36 prop changes the performance of your plane. I think the longer blades, with a shorter pitch would work better on a Pietenpol...at least as far as climb / short field take off performance, but I've never heard of anyone using that prop on their Piet. It just seems lik e the standard prop for an A 65 has always been a 72 X 42 prop. Chuck G. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: down in 230'
Date: Jan 19, 2007
From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com>
I never got more than 500 feet off the ground on that trip, Chuck (typical Pietenpol altitude for me). I know why you went high - trying to get out of the turbulence down low. It about beat me to death. Down low the winds were more from the west-southwet and I had a pretty good tailwind component. As I recall, I was seeing groundspeed on the GPS of around 90 mph. I only stayed at OSH until Wednesday morning, then took off for the long trip home. I'm bringing the RV-4 this year. Will you have your Tailwind at Brodhead this summer? Jack Trying to stay focused on building the RV-10 (yawn). Not as much challenge or fun as a Pietenpol, but slightly better for travelling -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rcaprd(at)aol.com Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 1:10 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: down in 230' In a message dated 1/17/2007 7:02:18 AM Central Standard Time, Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com writes: Winds were 250 at 20 kts, gusts to 25 (remember the winds that morning, Chuck?). Ah yes, Jack, I remember that morning well. Brodhead '05, and you took off shortly before I did, en route to that other show up north. You must have stayed low on that leg, because the winds at 3000' msl where I was, were quite different. I don't really know why I climbed that high...I think I just wanted to see more of the beautiful Wisconsin countryside from the higher altitude. I got about 15 miles to the north of Brodhead, trying to track to the North, but the strong winds out of the West caused the nose of my plane to point almost directly West !! I had almost full power in, and was indicating just over 75 mph, and according to my GPS, I had about 15 mph. ground speed. At one point, I noticed a tower to the North, between the right struts a couple of miles away. Five minutes later that tower was still in the same place...10 minutes later, still there...15 minutes later that tower didn't change location !! I've never been in that situation before, where I'm trying to track north, heading west, with almost full power in and getting nowhere. It was a strange feeling. I decided to abort the leg to Oshkosh, and headed back to Brodhead. For a while, I wasn't sure that I could even make it back, till I dropped to a much lower altitude where the winds weren't quite as strong. I finally made it back to Brodhead, and rode up to Oshkosh with Dennis & Kathy E. We had a great time there, but I never could find Jack. Chuck G. NX770CG _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilege d, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it i n error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers
Date: Jan 19, 2007
From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com>
As I indicated, I hope to do the prop swap this spring - probably after I fly the Pietenpol to Sun 'n' Fun. I wish I had a second prop hub - then the swap would be easier. The St. Croix came from a fellow in our EAA Chapter who had started a Pietenpol project with a couple of other fellows years ago. He bought the prop and then decided he didn't like the workmanship the rest of the team was doing, so he took his prop and left the partnership. When he found I was building a Piet, he offered to sell it to me for what he paid for it in the early '80's - $125. I bought the Sensenich because I wanted to get my test time down to 25 hours, and I thought it would perform better. If the St. Croix works as well as I think it will, I'll probably sell the Sensenich. Jack NX899JP -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rcaprd(at)aol.com Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 1:23 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Jay Anderson Cloudcars & Tennessee propellers In a message dated 1/18/2007 8:13:15 AM Central Standard Time, Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com writes: As I said in an earlier post, I've got a St. Croix that is 74 x 36 and was supposedly designed for a Pietenpol, as a climb prop. I have not flown it yet, but will do so this spring. Jack, I'm very interested in how the 74 X 36 prop changes the performance of your plane. I think the longer blades, with a shorter pitch would work better on a Pietenpol...at least as far as climb / short field take off performance, but I've never heard of anyone using that prop on their Piet. It just seems like the standard prop for an A 65 has always been a 72 X 42 prop. Chuck G. _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilege d, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it i n error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: prop swaps
Date: Jan 19, 2007
Jack wrote- >I wish I had a second prop hub - then the swap would be easier. I take it that you have a tapered shaft hub and the prop bolts are the problem? But if both props have the same thickness at the hub, can't you use the same length bolts? What's easier about pulling and swapping the entire prop and prop hub over swapping just the prop on the same hub? Oscar Zuniga San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags(at)hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net _________________________________________________________________ Search for grocery stores. Find gratitude. Turn a simple search into something more. http://click4thecause.live.com/search/charity/default.aspx?source=hmemtagline_gratitude&FORM=WLMTAG ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: prop swaps
Date: Jan 19, 2007
From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com>
Yes, I have a tapered shaft. If I had an additional hub, I could mount the new prop to the spare hub, then just pull the entire prop/hub assembly off the engine and install the new one, without ever having to remove and re-torque the prop bolts. Unfortunately, a new hub assembly sells for somewhere in the $500 neighborhood. I bought another one on ebay for about $100, but I was dissappointed with its quality and don't consider it airworthy. The tapered shaft is a pretty neat concept. The thread on the end of the shaft allows the threaded collar on the hub to act as a "prop puller". By inserting a 1/2" diameter rod into the hole in that collar, you can just unscrew the whole assembly, backing the hub off the keyed taper of the crankshaft. Jack Phillips -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Oscar Zuniga Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 8:57 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: prop swaps Jack wrote- >I wish I had a second prop hub - then the swap would be easier. I take it that you have a tapered shaft hub and the prop bolts are the problem? But if both props have the same thickness at the hub, can't you use the same length bolts? What's easier about pulling and swapping the entire prop and prop hub over swapping just the prop on the same hub? Oscar Zuniga San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags(at)hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net _________________________________________________________________ Search for grocery stores. Find gratitude. Turn a simple search into something more. http://click4thecause.live.com/search/charity/default.aspx?source=hmemta gline_gratitude&FORM=WLMTAG _________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Joe Krzes" <jkrzes(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: passed your checkride!
Date: Jan 19, 2007
Yep, Ol' Andy reached down and shut the fuel off on the C-150 during my checkride (also at DWH). I passed. Shirt tail that was hung up in the hanger is long gone, but I have the other part of the shirt :) Joe >From: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com> > >Andy Anderson, old-time instructor at David Wayne Hooks Memorial field >outside of Houston, TX- gave me my checkride. Smooth and strong as an old >hickory walking stick was old Andy, skin was the color of walnut and just >as sturdy. I took my ride in a Piper Warrior that I knew inside and out >and it went great. Andy pulled the old "darn... these old fingers... I >dropped my pencil down there by the flap handle. Would you reach and get >it while I try to fold this sectional, please?" while he put the airplane >in an unusual attitude and messed up my inner ear. No problem; I recovered >it and we moved on. _________________________________________________________________ Get in the mood for Valentine's Day. View photos, recipes and more on your Live.com page. http://www.live.com/?addTemplate=ValentinesDay&ocid=T001MSN30A0701 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: passed your checkride!
From: Hans Vander Voort <hans.vander.voort(at)alfalaval.com>
Date: Jan 19, 2007
Well I don't know Andy, But DWH is where I passed my check ride, still rent an airplane there once in a while. The flight school is moving away from aluminum steam gage Cessna's and has now plastic & glass Katana and Cirrus on the flight line. Hans ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: taper-shaft prop hubs, Continentals
Date: Jan 19, 2007
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
I agree with the practical nature of the taper-shaft prop hub design Jack, but in reality it really wouldn't take you much longer than an hour to remove your prop/hub assembly, knock the prop bolts out, and re-install, torque, and track your other prop. We are supposed to totally relax our prop bolts once a year then re-torque and check after about 45 minutes again so you're almost 1/2 way there with that procedure alone. I'm preaching to the choir I know, but worth a thought I think. Too bad your weather has turned to crap like us, but tis winter. Mike C. PS-- the guy who sold me my engine (runout, no logs from North Carolina, incidentally) was not happy with himself after he found out he should have sold me the engine sans the taper-shaft prop hub since he could have sold it for a third again as much as he sold me the entire engine, carb, mags, and hub for ! (I didn't know how much those were worth either until I had the engine home in my basement) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom Stinemetze" <tstinemetze(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: passed your check ride!
Date: Jan 19, 2007
> Now follow me off my wing as I fly 41CC through that big field with the trees alongside it up ahead. The space between the trees and the fencerow is plenty wide enough to clear our wingtips. Smoke on and down onto the deck!!! < Oscar: Thanks for that great story. Now I'm going to have to put smoke in the Piet for sure. Maybe I can join you, Mike C., and Chuck G. and fog for mosquitoes at Broadhead. I hear they get pretty big up there. Tom Stinemetze ____ | ____ \8/ / \ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rcaprd(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 21, 2007
Subject: Re: down in 230'
In a message dated 1/19/2007 7:00:09 AM Central Standard Time, Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com writes: I never got more than 500 feet off the ground on that trip, Chuck (typical Pietenpol altitude for me). I know why you went high =93 trying to ge t out of the turbulence down low. It about beat me to death. Down low the winds were more from the west-southwet and I had a pretty good tailwind component. As I recall, I was seeing groundspeed on the GPS of around 90 mph. I only stayed at OSH until Wednesday morning, then took off for the long tri p home. I=99m bringing the RV-4 this year. Will you have your Tailwind at Bro dhead this summer? Jack, Yes, you are right about that turbulence...it was pretty rough down low. I think we got going too late in the morning. It was the only flight that I'v e ever made, that I didn't make my intended destination. Every flight is certainly a Learning Experience, and I love it !! I'm hoping to get both wings complete this winter, in the environmentally controlled atmosphere of my Dining Room. Having done that, I'll be able to pre-fit them to the fuselage in the spring, and then complete the fuselage. I think the cowling is going to take me a long time to build, because I hope t o make a very efficient cooling system. Instrument panel will be two flat screens, with a small steam gauges - ASI and Altimeter as backup. If I didn't have t o go to work every day, I could certainly have 'er going by mid summer. Be th at as it may, I think it will be a next summer '08 before she graces the skies. Jack,I hope you still have that spam can RV-4 then !! Chuck G. NX770CG ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rcaprd(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 21, 2007
Subject: Airstrips
In a message dated 1/19/2007 11:09:09 AM Central Standard Time, taildrags(at)hotmail.com writes: You don't see the airport until you're practically over it, which means you need a fairly steep approach over the trees once you're there. I guess with the Piet all you'd have to do is chop the power and you'd come right down. Oscar, That reminds me of where NX41CC first broke the surely bonds of earth, and was born - Bluebird Hill Airport (5F5). I think I probably still slipped it in a little. Ol' Corky warned me not to get it mixed up with another small airstrip that is a couple of miles to the west. "If you land there, you will be shot on sight !!" Hummmm....OK, Corky...I'll keep that in mind. Chuck G. NX770CG ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rcaprd(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 21, 2007
Subject: Re: passed your check ride!
In a message dated 1/19/2007 6:32:33 PM Central Standard Time, tstinemetze(at)cox.net writes: Oscar: Thanks for that great story. Now I'm going to have to put smoke in the Piet for sure. Maybe I can join you, Mike C., and Chuck G. and fog for mosquitoes at Broadhead. I hear they get pretty big up there. Hey Tom, Congrats on your checkride !! I'm going to make a flight up to McPhereson sometime this spring, and give you some stick time in my plane...I have the stick, throttle and now I have an intercom in the front cockpit, but I didn't install the pedals, because unless you have very short legs, there is just not enough room up there. Besides, the rudder pedals would be in the way of cargo, where as the stick is easily removed. Chuck G. NX770CG Wichita, KS with 6 or 7 inches on snow on the ground since yesterday ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 21, 2007
From: "Rick Holland" <at7000ft(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: passed your checkride !
You are right about taking check rides on rough days Mike, on my Private check ride a long time ago the crosswinds were too strong do short field landing approaches so the examiner just asked me to describe how I would do them and that was good enough. However if the winds are real bad he could just ask you to come back and complete the testing on another day. Rick On 1/18/07, Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC] wrote: > > michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov> > > > Way to go Tom Stinemetze on passing your private checkride and letting > us know !!!! > Sure is more fun to build a Piet if you know you are qualified to fly it > when you're done. > Excellent. I half think that you have a better chance of passing a > checkride on a rough > day since you have to prove you can handle the plane in adverse > conditions---and you did ! > > Loved my checkride in 1981. WWII veteran. Instructor from Kent State > University named Dick Schwabe. > He flew more of the checkride than I did because he rarely got time in > much else than 150's and I > showed up in a Grumman AA-1B. Still a rough, windy day and despite my > flaws, he passed me. > > Mike C. > > PS-- you'll sleep good tonight > > -- Rick Holland "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad" ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 21, 2007
From: "Rick Holland" <at7000ft(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: down in 230'
A guy in our chapter is also building an RV-10, never seen so many clecos in my life, think he said he had a total of around 10,000 rivets to drive, is that right? Rick On 1/19/07, Phillips, Jack wrote: > > > I'm bringing the RV-4 this year. Will you have your Tailwind at Brodhead > this summer? > > > Jack > > Trying to stay focused on building the RV-10 (yawn). Not as much > challenge or fun as a Pietenpol, but slightly better for travelling > > > -----Original Message----- > *From:* owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto: > owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Rcaprd(at)aol.com > *Sent:* Friday, January 19, 2007 1:10 AM > *To:* pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* Re: Pietenpol-List: down in 230' > > > In a message dated 1/17/2007 7:02:18 AM Central Standard Time, > Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com writes: > > Winds were 250 at > 20 kts, gusts to 25 (remember the winds that morning, Chuck?). > > Ah yes, Jack, I remember that morning well. Brodhead '05, and you took > off shortly before I did, en route to that other show up north. You must > have stayed low on that leg, because the winds at 3000' msl where I was, > were quite different. I don't really know why I climbed that high...I think > I just wanted to see more of the beautiful Wisconsin countryside from the > higher altitude. I got about 15 miles to the north of Brodhead, trying to > track to the North, but the strong winds out of the West caused the nose of > my plane to point almost directly West !! I had almost full power in, and > was indicating just over 75 mph, and according to my GPS, I had about 15 > mph. ground speed. At one point, I noticed a tower to the North, between > the right struts a couple of miles away. Five minutes later that tower was > still in the same place...10 minutes later, still there...15 minutes later > that tower didn't change location !! I've never been in that situation > before, where I'm trying to track north, heading west, with almost full > power in and getting nowhere. It was a strange feeling. I decided to abort > the leg to Oshkosh, and headed back to Brodhead. For a while, I wasn't sure > that I could even make it back, till I dropped to a much lower altitude > where the winds weren't quite as strong. I finally made it back to > Brodhead, and rode up to Oshkosh with Dennis & Kathy E. We had a great time > there, but I never could find Jack. > > > Chuck G. > > NX770CG > > * * > > * * > > > _________________________________________________ > > > Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N > > * > > > * > > -- Rick Holland "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad" ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 21, 2007
From: Tim Verthein <minoxphotographer(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Steamin' Curious
Since I'm still in the planing and gathering stages of the project, I noticed on the Pietenpol Official Website in the discussion on construction, it says "no steaming" necessary for rib construction, yet here it's often discussed. What's the scoop on that? Tim in Bovey == You *can* repair a flip-flop with a capacitor! == Have a burning question? Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 21, 2007
From: del magsam <farmerdel(at)rocketmail.com>
Subject: Re: Steamin' Curious
It means that you don't have to steam anything but some people do anyway. I didn't and got along just fine, but maybe others like to think of their longerons without that much pressure/stress on them. A personal choice....works either way Del Tim Verthein wrote: Since I'm still in the planing and gathering stages of the project, I noticed on the Pietenpol Official Website in the discussion on construction, it says "no steaming" necessary for rib construction, yet here it's often discussed. What's the scoop on that? Tim in Bovey == You *can* repair a flip-flop with a capacitor! == Have a burning question? Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know. Del-New Richmond, Wi "farmerdel(at)rocketmail.com" --------------------------------- It's here! Your new message! Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 21, 2007
From: "walt evans" <waltdak(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Steamin' Curious
Tim, My feeling was that I didn't want to take the chance of breaking a rib cap, so I steamed,,,or actually "steeped" Every day I'd come home from work, and put on a pot of water to boil. By the time I'd changed, the water was boiling. Carried it down to the aircraft factory (cellar). And poured it into a thing I'd made out of 1 1/4" (or 1 1/2") white PVC pipe. It was capped and vertical, and about 16" tall. This was mounted on a wood block so it was self standing. I'd pour the water in the pipe, and insert the end on the next capstrip. And it would "steep" while I put away the completed rib I'd done the day before , and removed the prior rib from the jig ready to get the second side of gussets, and lay that aside. Now lay the bottom cap strip in the jig, pull the top strip out of the pipe and bend it beautifully around the jig top formers, and procede to cut the rest of the rib "sticks". When done, pull the internal sticks out, after numbering them, and mix a batch of T-88. that rib got glued with one side gussets,,,and the previous nites got a final set of gussets. this drill goes on for 30 some odd days till the gussets are done. I usually left the rib work for the last hour or so of the work day. Kind of played it by ear,,,when I had an hour left in me,,I'd switch to the rib job. Before you know it the ribs are done. They are all the same except for the end ribs that have more sticks. walt evans NX140DL PS Just remember that T-88 work just as well on wet wood as dry,,,amazing! read the specs "Put your wealth in knowledge, and no one can ever take it from you" Ben Franklin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Verthein" <minoxphotographer(at)yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 4:20 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Steamin' Curious > > > Since I'm still in the planing and gathering stages of the project, I > noticed on the Pietenpol Official Website in the discussion on > construction, it says "no steaming" necessary for rib construction, yet > here it's often discussed. What's the scoop on that? > > Tim in Bovey > > == > You *can* repair a flip-flop with a capacitor! > == > > > Have a burning question? > Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know. > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dick Navratil" <horzpool(at)goldengate.net>
Subject: welding
Date: Jan 21, 2007
A question for any who are more experienced at Oxy/actl welding. I was making some parts today and kept having that popping in the molten pool. Sometimes I can work away without having it occur but today it was blowing holes in my tubing.That is real frustrating. Can someone tell me what I am doing wrong. Dick N. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "GlennThomas(at)flyingwood.com" <glennthomas(at)flyingwood.com>
Subject: Re: Steamin' Curious
Date: Jan 21, 2007
I did things very close to the way Walt explains. Although, Walt being a better man than I, got it done in 30 days. I do a rib whenever I can and have been lucky to get 3 or 4 a week lately and have been at it for 9 months. Today just finished up rib #20. 12 more to go. Watching them add up in my study is keeping me active in the shop. Renovations on my house took me out of the game for a couple months but I've been staying pretty committed to getting the ribs done the last month or so. Steaming... I originally made something that just allowed steam to pass by them and it didn't seem to penetrate (even after an hour) and the capstrip broke when clamping into the bending jig. ...so I put a wine bottle full of water (kind of a double-boiler) in the steam chamber and let them sit there while I make a rib. When the gussets are all on the second side of the last rib and then the gussets of the first side of the next rib is done I pull it out of the steamer and put it in a bending jig to set it's curve. Every day out in the rib factory it's a similar routine: 1. Start a capstrip in the steamer. 2. Put the Side B gussets on the last half-completed rib. 3. Cut and fit into the rib jig all the pieces and put the Side A gussets on using the capstrip now dry in the bending jig from the previous day. (Doesn't necessarily have to be dry, just fits my pace/routine.) 4. Put the freshly steamed capstrip in the bending jig. It only takes a day (actually a few hours) to do those 4 steps, so if you have the time you definitely should be able to do it in a month. (and I clamp my gussets using a custom clamping rib jig) If you use staples or nails you could make more than 1 rib per day. I like the no-nails look and the reduced weight. Time up front spent on a jig that clamps is reclaimed in the end. Idea was stolen from Bill Church on MyKitPlanes.com. Lots of great pictures of his and other projects there too. Everybody has a slightly different way of doing things and if you go to Brodhead and see them side by side you can see their many subtle differences but all recognizably Pietepols, very cool. If you didn't scratch your head and come up with your own way to build each part you missed out on the fun. Glenn W. Thomas Storrs, CT http://www.flyingwood.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "gcardinal" <gcardinal(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: welding
Date: Jan 21, 2007
Hi Dick, Increase the flow of gas. The popping is the welding gases igniting inside the torch because the tip is getting too hot. Greg C. ----- Original Message ----- From: Dick Navratil To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 8:15 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: welding A question for any who are more experienced at Oxy/actl welding. I was making some parts today and kept having that popping in the molten pool. Sometimes I can work away without having it occur but today it was blowing holes in my tubing.That is real frustrating. Can someone tell me what I am doing wrong. Dick N. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: lshutks(at)webtv.net (Leon Stefan)
Date: Jan 22, 2007
Subject: Re: welding
Hi Dick: Ditto what Greg said. That happened to me too and someone suggested going to a larger tip size for more flow to cool the tip. That worked for me. Lucky for me I didn't burn the house down. Leon S. Finally having a white Christmas in Ks.--a mo. late. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: down in 230'
Date: Jan 22, 2007
From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com>
Chuck, I should still have the RV-4 in '08. My original plan was to sell the RV-4 when it came time to buy the engine for the RV-10 and use the money to buy a Lycoming IO-540. However, I got an opportunity to pick up a freshly rebuilt O-540-A1D5 from an Aztec for $13K this past fall, so I already have the engine for the RV-10 and can keep the RV-4 a little longer. I'm going to miss it when I finally have to sell it. The RV-10 will be nice for travel, but that's all. The RV-4 is just FUN. Not the most comfortable cross-country airplane, though. Karen gets tired of just staring at the back of my head. I'm hoping to have the RV-10 finished in early 2009, and at that point I'll have to seel the -4. Can't afford to keep three airplanes, and I'll never sell the Pietenpol. Jack Phillips NX899JP Pietenpol Air Camper N18LR RV-4 N142KW RV-10 (under construction) -----Original Message----- .=2E. Be that as it may, I think it will be a next summer '08 before she graces the skies. Jack,I hope you still have that spam can RV-4 then !! Chuck G. NX770CG _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilege d, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it i n error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dave Abramson" <davea(at)symbolicdisplays.com>
Subject: Steamin' Curious
Date: Jan 22, 2007
This is also how I did my ribs....I had a 24" tube that I filled with cold water. Let the cap strip soak for 8hrs then after work poured out the cold water and filled with VERY hot water to soak the cap strip in for 5min or so.... Took it out of the water wiped it off and put it into my rib jig.. you know the rest..... Worked out very well and you get a system after a while and they move right along. Cheers, Dave -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of walt evans Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 3:52 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Steamin' Curious Tim, My feeling was that I didn't want to take the chance of breaking a rib cap, so I steamed,,,or actually "steeped" Every day I'd come home from work, and put on a pot of water to boil. By the time I'd changed, the water was boiling. Carried it down to the aircraft factory (cellar). And poured it into a thing I'd made out of 1 1/4" (or 1 1/2") white PVC pipe. It was capped and vertical, and about 16" tall. This was mounted on a wood block so it was self standing. I'd pour the water in the pipe, and insert the end on the next capstrip. And it would "steep" while I put away the completed rib I'd done the day before , and removed the prior rib from the jig ready to get the second side of gussets, and lay that aside. Now lay the bottom cap strip in the jig, pull the top strip out of the pipe and bend it beautifully around the jig top formers, and procede to cut the rest of the rib "sticks". When done, pull the internal sticks out, after numbering them, and mix a batch of T-88. that rib got glued with one side gussets,,,and the previous nites got a final set of gussets. this drill goes on for 30 some odd days till the gussets are done. I usually left the rib work for the last hour or so of the work day. Kind of played it by ear,,,when I had an hour left in me,,I'd switch to the rib job. Before you know it the ribs are done. They are all the same except for the end ribs that have more sticks. walt evans NX140DL PS Just remember that T-88 work just as well on wet wood as dry,,,amazing! read the specs "Put your wealth in knowledge, and no one can ever take it from you" Ben Franklin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Verthein" <minoxphotographer(at)yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 4:20 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Steamin' Curious > > > Since I'm still in the planing and gathering stages of the project, I > noticed on the Pietenpol Official Website in the discussion on > construction, it says "no steaming" necessary for rib construction, yet > here it's often discussed. What's the scoop on that? > > Tim in Bovey > > == > You *can* repair a flip-flop with a capacitor! > == > > > Have a burning question? > Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: TGSTONE236(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 22, 2007
Subject: Steamer for wood bending
I needed to bend some wood so I made a steamer. 10 ft X 4 inch pvc pipe 2 - 4 inch pvc pipe threaded adapter no need to glue things together. just slip fit 2 - 4 in pvc threaded plug 1 wallpaper steamer , drill a hole in one plug end for the steamer hose and some vent holes in the other plug for the steam to exit. this is the most efficient rig I have ever used for bending wood. Try it Ted Stone Building a Piet one little piece at a time ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed G." <flyboy_120(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: welding
Date: Jan 22, 2007
Hi Dick Popping is caused by burning too small a flame on too big of a tip. use a smaller tip which will give you a smaller flame but still keep the flow of gas up enough to cool the tip. Ed G. >From: "Dick Navratil" <horzpool(at)goldengate.net> >Reply-To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: Pietenpol-List: welding >Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:15:25 -0600 > >A question for any who are more experienced at Oxy/actl welding. I was >making some parts today and kept having that popping in the molten pool. >Sometimes I can work away without having it occur but today it was blowing >holes in my tubing.That is real frustrating. >Can someone tell me what I am doing wrong. >Dick N. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: saving hands and fingers on the table saw
Date: Jan 22, 2007
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Click on the hot dog demo video if nothing else. Amazing...a small electrical charge in this saw's blade is constantly monitored and if your finger or hand touches the blade it changes the charge slightly that the electronics are monitoring in the blade and an aluminum blade brake stops the saw in something like 1/4000th of a second. Amazing...a small electrical charge in this saw's blade is constantly monitored and if your finger or hand touches the blade it changes the charge slightly that the electronics are monitoring in the blade and an aluminum blade brake stops the saw in something like 1/4000th of a second. http://www.sawstop.com/ <http://www.sawstop.com/> ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Graham Hansen" <ghans@cable-lynx.net>
Subject: Re: welding
Date: Jan 22, 2007
Dick, Torch popping/backfiring is often caused by: 1. Holding the inner cone of the flame too close to the puddle, thus overheating the tip. 2. A partly clogged, or dirty, tip. 3. Using too large a tip for the job, and reducing the gas flow too much in order to avoid totally melting the work piece. Possible solutions: Keep tips clean and use the recommended tip pressures for the tip size you are using (this may vary with the make of the welding outfit). Keep inner flame cone clear of the puddle (try 1/8" to 1/4" clearance and find what works for you). Don't use too large a tip for the job and try to throttle it back; take the time to switch to a smaller tip, rather than trying to manage with the too-large tip. Good luck! Graham Hansen (Pietenpol CF-AUN) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Singleton" <slsingleton(at)cvalley.net>
Subject: Re: Steamer for wood bending
Date: Jan 22, 2007
I made a temporary steamer useing a 4ft x 6in pipe (galv.) welded one end shut, set it up over the barbeque grill burner (of cource one end was higher than the other) fill with water and after a bit the water boils-stick in as many cap strips as you can hold onto and after 30 seconds in the boiling water took out and clamped them in a wide jig. done about half the cap strips at a time. I did disect the burner so i could raise it up somewhat so a 4in concrete block could be put under it to raise it up to meet the pipe. I'll admit the galv pipe is not ideal to weld on but it was cheap to make. I also used a srap piece of metal to close off most of the open end. Had a lot of fun doing this-sometime i want to try heating a 2x4 and see how much it will bend. Steve Singleton ----- Original Message ----- From: TGSTONE236(at)aol.com To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 9:06 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Steamer for wood bending I needed to bend some wood so I made a steamer. 10 ft X 4 inch pvc pipe 2 - 4 inch pvc pipe threaded adapter no need to glue things together. just slip fit 2 - 4 in pvc threaded plug 1 wallpaper steamer , drill a hole in one plug end for the steamer hose and some vent holes in the other plug for the steam to exit. this is the most efficient rig I have ever used for bending wood. Try it Ted Stone Building a Piet one little piece at a time ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom Stinemetze" <tstinemetze(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: passed your check ride!
Date: Jan 22, 2007
Hey Chuck: Stick time in a real, honest to goodness Air Camper. Now I've got something to get the juices flowing. Tom in McPherson ____ | ____ \8/ / \ > Congrats on your checkride !! I'm going to make a flight up to McPherson sometime this spring, and give you some stick time in my plane...I have the stick, throttle and now I have an intercom in the front cockpit, but I didn't install the pedals, because unless you have very short legs, there is just not enough room up there. Besides, the rudder pedals would be in the way of cargo, where as the stick is easily removed.> ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Whaley" <MerlinFAC(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Fly-In in Central Florida... seeking Piets & other interesting
airplanes
Date: Jan 22, 2007
Hi all, I know this is a bit off-topic but perhaps it will be of interest to those of you in Florida... we're having a little fly-in / aviation day type event on February 17th at Valkaria Airport (X59) and we're trying to round up "exotic" aircraft to show all the interesting aspects of general and recreational aviation to the community. ("Exotic" meaning anything except a white Cessna 152, basically... homebuilts, warbirds, ultralights, balloons, helicopters, anti-gravity boots, rocket belts, magic flying carpets, big red bulletproof capes, etc.) Valkaria is a small uncontrolled field a little bit south of Melbourne on the east coast of Florida, with cheap avgas and some interesting homebuilt activity. If anyone is interested in attending, get in touch with me and I can give you more info, or check out our website: http://www.mlbpilots.org/ValkariaAirFest/ Thanks! -Mike Mike Whaley merlin@ov-10bronco.net Webmaster, OV-10 Bronco Association http://www.ov-10bronco.net/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "GlennThomas(at)flyingwood.com" <glennthomas(at)flyingwood.com>
Subject: Re: saving hands and fingers on the table saw
Date: Jan 22, 2007
Hmmm, I wonder if this technology could be adapted to my circa 1950 Cast Iron Craftsman table saw. Glenn W. Thomas Storrs, CT http://www.flyingwood.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC] To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 2:51 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: saving hands and fingers on the table saw Click on the hot dog demo video if nothing else. Amazing.a small electrical charge in this saw's blade is constantly monitored and if your finger or hand touches the blade it changes the charge slightly that the electronics are monitoring in the blade and an aluminum blade brake stops the saw in something like 1/4000th of a second. Amazing.a small electrical charge in this saw's blade is constantly monitored and if your finger or hand touches the blade it changes the charge slightly that the electronics are monitoring in the blade and an aluminum blade brake stops the saw in something like 1/4000th of a second. http://www.sawstop.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: snow in Texas Metric snow?
Date: Jan 22, 2007
Steve in Maine wrote- >Looks to me like you got 20 cm. Glad to see you use the metric system Alright, lay off. So I played on "special effects" a little bit. Maybe that just adds to the humor, OK? I could have said that the tape was a scaling tape used by loggers to measure tree diameter. >Do you get metric snowflakes in Texas I thought they just fell up in >Canada. No, up there they have "bunyip" snowflakes or something. Eh?! ;o) In order to keep this focused on Pietenpols, I'd like to mention that the president of our EAA Chapter 35 just invited me to present the February program to our chapter. I chose the topic, "All About Aircampers" and will outline the attractions of our simple, affordable, honest Pietenpol. I'm putting together a Powerpoint presentation with a general introduction to the airplane, source of information and plans (the Pietenpol family, the BPA, and this list), engine options, and of course all of the traits that make this airplane such a fine contender for any builder's project. With a heavy population of ex-Air Force people around here, this airplane should win more hearts than among the modern "fast glass/slick panel" crowd. Anyway, I have plenty of great photos for the program (thanks again, Chris Tracy, for such a great stash of photos). And Mike Cuy, and Chuck Gantzer, and Corky, and DJ Vegh, and Steve Eldredge, Don Emch, and so many of you who have provided a rich archive of extremely nice photos and documentation of the building and flying process. The problem is sifting them all down to a 35-minute presentation! I'll tell you, Don's photo of his airplane full of kids has got to be one of the all-time classics and says it all about what this airplane, and flying, are all about... Oscar Zuniga San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags(at)hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net _________________________________________________________________ Valentines Day -- Shop for gifts that spell L-O-V-E at MSN Shopping http://shopping.msn.com/content/shp/?ctId=8323,ptnrid=37,ptnrdata=24095&tcode=wlmtagline ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dick Navratil" <horzpool(at)goldengate.net>
Subject: welding
Date: Jan 22, 2007
Thanks all for the input. I don't do enough welding to ever get good at it. I went out tonight for an evenings entertainment, cleaned the tip, there was already a 205 tip installed, I adjusted pressures and tried a hotter flame and holding the tip farther from the puddle. Much better and now I have a new tailwheel assembly. Dick N. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "GlennThomas(at)flyingwood.com" <glennthomas(at)flyingwood.com>
Subject: Re: snow in Texas Metric snow?
Date: Jan 22, 2007
You could probably start off with a plans interpretation intro and continue the presentation on the group dynamics of this forum. The information you received from the various sources you mentioned could be the various interpretations of plans/modifications citing photos from different sources as each individual's own interpretation and their chosen technique for implementing a certain aspect of the plane's construction. In the end they are all nice Air Campers, right? You might even limit the discussion to one part of the plane and cover the various methods people have chosen to, say, build a wing. I sit in on other building forums and they are nothing like ours. We all respect each other and know when to provide ideas and when to be silent. This group has been my greatest resource so far. Just trying to give you an angle. Glenn W. Thomas Storrs, CT http://www.flyingwood.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 23, 2007
From: Clif Dawson <CDAWSON5854(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: saving hands and fingers on the table saw
Why pay for something you already have? It's a wonderful piece of natural technology called "Situational Awareness". To paraphrase, it's "Where the Eye Meets the Blade." Like any fine tool it benefits from sharpening. Clif ----- Original Message ----- From: GlennThomas(at)flyingwood.com To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 7:17 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: saving hands and fingers on the table saw Hmmm, I wonder if this technology could be adapted to my circa 1950 Cast Iron Craftsman table saw. Glenn W. Thomas Storrs, CT http://www.flyingwood.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: saving hands and fingers on the table saw
Date: Jan 23, 2007
From: amsafetyc(at)aol.com
As the consummate safety director that I am, I have contacted them to ask th e same question. A retro fit for all saws would save tons of injuries, indus trial as well as infrequent hobbyist and the dedicated Piet builder. It shou ld be interesting to see a reply of which I will share as soon as they get b ack to me. Although I have the professional interest, as of this week end I was putting my table saw together, thinking about the hazards associated with it and ho w to prevent them. John -----Original Message----- From: glennthomas(at)flyingwood.com Sent: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:17 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: saving hands and fingers on the table saw Hmmm, I wonder if this technology could be adapted to my circa 1950 Cast Iron Craf tsman table saw. Glenn W. Thomas Storrs, CT http://www.flyingwood.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 2:51 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: saving hands and fingers on the table saw Click on the hot dog demo video if nothing else. Amazinga small electrical charge in this saw's blade is constantly monitored and if your finger or hand touches the blade it changes the charge slightly that the electronics are mo nitoring in the blade and an aluminum blade brake stops the saw in something like 1/4000th of a se cond. Amazinga small electrical charge in this saw's blade is constantly monitored and if your finger or hand touches the blade it changes the charge slightly that the electronics are mo nitoring in the blade and an aluminum blade brake stops the saw in something like 1/4000th of a se cond. http://www.sawstop.com/ href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.matron ics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________ ee AOL Mail and more. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Steamin' Curious
Date: Jan 23, 2007
From: "Bill Church" <eng(at)canadianrogers.com>
Granted, this isn't an airplane part, but here's an example of the power of steam bending. In the attached photo you'll see a small wooden box I just built (from a kit) http://www.leevalley.com/wood/page.aspx?c=1&p=53191&cat=1,250,43313 &ap=1 The wood (cherry) is 1/16" thick, and was soaked in hot water for about 20 minutes, then put into my capstrip steamer for another 20 minutes. I was amazed how pliable the wood became. Of course, the thinner the strip, the more pliable it is, so it's no real surprise that the thin strips were much more bendy (scientific term)than my 1/4" x 1/2" spruce capstrips were, but look how sharp those ends are bent. It's important to get the wood wet and hot. The heat helps to change the structure of the lignin (the "glue" that holds the wood fibers together) and allows the wood fibers to move. When the wood cools down and dries out, it holds the shape. This box doesn't use any glue - just a few copper tacks and a few tiny wooden dowels (toothpicks). While it may be possible to build your wing ribs without steaming or soaking your top capstrips and pre-bending them, I think it would put unnecessary stress in your rib structure, and make fitting your pieces into your rib jig more frustrating. Afterall, what you are trying to achieve is a strong, stable, lightweight, consistant profile. The fuselage longerons, however, have a much gentler curve (especially the "Improved Air Camper" (1933) plans as compared to the Flying and Glider plans), and are not necessary to pre-bend - although I haven't done my fuselage yet, so what do I know. You would need quite a big steam box to steam your longerons. Bill C ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HelsperSew(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 23, 2007
Subject: Re: Steamin' Curious
Bill, I built all my ribs before I knew I was supposed to steam the top cap strip. The guys at Brodhead said they had heard of ribs breaking after the airplane had been flown awhile. They scared me, so I took all my finished ribs, and soaked the noses of them in warm water in a 5 gal. bucket. When I took them out, two of the top cap strip pieces had broken at the sharpest point. I had to make these two ribs over again. My thinking was that soaking after completion relieved the stress, and was better than nothing. Dan Helsper Poplar Grove, IL. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: saws
Date: Jan 23, 2007
From: "Bill Church" <eng(at)canadianrogers.com>
When it comes to power tools, especially the table saw, one always has to keep in the FRONT (as opposed to the back) of one's mind just how powerful these tools are and how much respect they deserve. Take any chunk of wood and cut through it with a handsaw. Then cut that same piece of wood and do the same cut on a tablesaw. All that work that your arm did to cut the wood is packed into that one or two seconds of the tablesaw cut. Fingers are softer than wood, and. sawblades don't discriminate. I got my wake-up call when one time I decided to adjust the blade height without shutting the saw off. I got my eye level down to the saw table height and was using a piece of wood as reference for the desired blade height, when the wood made contact with the spinning blade. It kicked back, and the small piece of wood hit me square between the eyes. An inch or so to either side and I am sure I would have lost an eye. As it was I just ended up with a very conspicuous welt in the middle of my forehead. I was extremely lucky. Since then I have never made adjustments to the blade height or angle without shutting the saw off. ALWAYS be prepared for kickback, allowing a path for the wood to travel in that doesn't include contact with or passing through your body. Use a featherboard whenever possible. I have one more reminder of the need to respect the power of the table saw - my father-in-law's fingers (or lack thereof). He lost about one and a half fingers in a fraction of a second on his table saw several years ago. Unlike starfish, human fingers don't grow back. Be safe. Stay awake. Bill C ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Steamin' Curious
Date: Jan 23, 2007
From: "Bill Church" <eng(at)canadianrogers.com>
Dan, My guess is that the two capstrips that broke probably had defects or weak spots in the wood, and would have also broken if you had pre-soaked and pre-bent them. The lucky part is that you found out before you had them assembled into a wing, and could easily replace them. Bill C ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Steamin' Curious
Date: Jan 23, 2007
From: amsafetyc(at)aol.com
That makes a good point, if the hot water test is found to be an acceptable stress inspection technique. Should that become a recommended practice for checking ribs either home made or purchased from another builder to identify ribs that may fail in flight? John -----Original Message----- From: eng(at)canadianrogers.com Sent: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:31 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Steamin' Curious Dan, My guess is that the two capstrips that broke probably had defects or weak spots in the wood, and would have also broken if you had pre-soaked and pre-bent them. The lucky part is that you found out before you had them assembled into a wing, and could easily replace them. Bill C ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Steamin' Curious
Date: Jan 23, 2007
From: "Bill Church" <eng(at)canadianrogers.com>
John, Before you start cooking your ribs, one thing to watch out for is whether the ribs were constructed with T-88 (or similar epoxy). These epoxies are not intended for high temperature applications, and sticking your assembled rib into a pot of boiling water might net you with a collection of loose sticks. Bill C. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: push sticks
Date: Jan 23, 2007
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Absolutely, Glenn. My old Sears table saw gave me outstanding service and used push sticks on 95% of my cuts. One push stick and a second push type stick to keep the work piece against the fence. Mike C. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 23, 2007
From: del magsam <farmerdel(at)rocketmail.com>
Subject: saws
Always keep to front of the sawblade as well, never reach around behind and pull something through. This is how people loose fingers 99 percent of the time. Del Bill Church wrote: When it comes to power tools, especially the table saw, one always has to keep in the FRONT (as opposed to the back) of one's mind Del-New Richmond, Wi "farmerdel(at)rocketmail.com" --------------------------------- Never miss an email again! Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: saws
Date: Jan 23, 2007
From: "Bill Church" <eng(at)canadianrogers.com>
Actually, you want to be a little off to the side, not directly in front of the blade. Carbide-tipped sawblades (which is the vast majority of the sawblades sold today) have been known to throw a tooth on occasion, if they are damaged. That tooth will be flying at over 100 - 125mph - a nasty little projectile that you don't want to hit your body parts. But, yes reaching to the back side of the blade is a good way to get your fingers pulled into the blade. Bill C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Eric Williams" <ewilliams805(at)msn.com>
Subject: Fly-In in Central Florida... seeking Piets & other
interesting airplanes
Date: Jan 23, 2007
We Cessna drivers won't be turned away by a squadron of Piets if we try to fly in will we? >From: "Mike Whaley" <MerlinFAC(at)cfl.rr.com> >Reply-To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >To: "Pietenpol List" >Subject: Pietenpol-List: Fly-In in Central Florida... seeking Piets & other >interesting airplanes >Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:38:59 -0500 > > >Hi all, > >I know this is a bit off-topic but perhaps it will be of interest to those >of you in Florida... we're having a little fly-in / aviation day type event >on February 17th at Valkaria Airport (X59) and we're trying to round up >"exotic" aircraft to show all the interesting aspects of general and >recreational aviation to the community. ("Exotic" meaning anything except a >white Cessna 152, basically... homebuilts, warbirds, ultralights, balloons, >helicopters, anti-gravity boots, rocket belts, magic flying carpets, big >red >bulletproof capes, etc.) Valkaria is a small uncontrolled field a little >bit >south of Melbourne on the east coast of Florida, with cheap avgas and some >interesting homebuilt activity. > >If anyone is interested in attending, get in touch with me and I can give >you more info, or check out our website: > >http://www.mlbpilots.org/ValkariaAirFest/ > >Thanks! > >-Mike > >Mike Whaley merlin@ov-10bronco.net >Webmaster, OV-10 Bronco Association >http://www.ov-10bronco.net/ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "MICHAEL SILVIUS" <M.Silvius(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: saws
Date: Jan 23, 2007
Had one of them flying carbide tips embed in my eye lid once!!!!! TABLE SAW SAFETY 101 your hands should never be on the table saw top. ---EVER--- use a push stick and a feather board, if you bugger up your wood - - -big deal!!!, it can be replaced, not so your fingers, besides it really sucks to try and pick your nose with stumps. 20 yrs of making a living as a carpenter and still have all my digits if you wrap your fingers around your board so as they make contact with the edge of the table top when they get to it your hands will never go near the blade. now for angle grinders- - - had cutting wheel shatter on me this summer. Makita 10k rpm, estimated distance to my belly 17 inches. the two inch piece that hit my belly (yes guard was on) was found in the neighbors garage 200 feet across the street. felt like a gun shot to the gut. Doubeld over out of breath for 5 minutes. Waiting to see the blod gush between my gloved fingers. I was real lucky, fortunately it hit side on as opposed to on edge so no penetration. the apple sized purple-pink-black-and-blue was sore as al getup for 32 weeks and took 3 months to dissipate. be safe. ----- Original Message ----- From: Bill Church . Carbide-tipped sawblades have been known to throw a tooth on occasion ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "MICHAEL SILVIUS" <M.Silvius(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: saws
Date: Jan 23, 2007
that was meant to read 3 weeks!! not 32 I Have no stumps but I type as if I doo!!! -black-and-blue was sore as al getup for 32 weeks and took 3 months to dissipate. be safe. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 23, 2007
From: Ben Charvet <bcharvet(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Fly-In in Central Florida... seeking Piets & other
interesting airplanes My Pietenpol won't be able to make it (still a few years away from flight), but I may be able to come in my Baby Ace. I bought it from a guy in my EAA chapter (866), and it was built in 1955. Not too exotic, but a homebuilt that old has to be a classic. I haven't flown it yet, cause I'm one test ride away from my BFR and tailwheel endorsement. If I get a chance to get in some flight practice and the weather looks good I'll head your way. Ben Charvet Mims, Fl Mike Whaley wrote: > >Hi all, > >I know this is a bit off-topic but perhaps it will be of interest to those >of you in Florida... we're having a little fly-in / aviation day type event >on February 17th at Valkaria Airport (X59) and we're trying to round up >"exotic" aircraft to show all the interesting aspects of general and >recreational aviation to the community. ( > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Online Piet database
Date: Jan 24, 2007
From: "Bill Church" <eng(at)canadianrogers.com>
Hi guys (and gals), Just stumbled onto this website that has a bunch of Piet photos (lots of them hi-res), and even more Piet registration info. If you have photos of any of the planes listed, you can submit your photo for all to share. I just posted a couple of Canadian Piets that I had photos of. Take a look and see if your plane is there. Not sure how you would add your plane if it's not listed, though. http://www.airport-data.com/search/search2.html?field=model&code=piet enp ol Bill C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dick Navratil" <horzpool(at)goldengate.net>
Subject: Re: Online Piet database
Date: Jan 24, 2007
Bill Thanks for posting that site. That list is amazing. Dick N. ----- Original Message ----- From: Bill Church To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 9:58 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Online Piet database Hi guys (and gals), Just stumbled onto this website that has a bunch of Piet photos (lots of them hi-res), and even more Piet registration info. If you have photos of any of the planes listed, you can submit your photo for all to share. I just posted a couple of Canadian Piets that I had photos of. Take a look and see if your plane is there. Not sure how you would add your plane if it's not listed, though. http://www.airport-data.com/search/search2.html?field=model&code=piet enpol Bill C. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 24, 2007
From: shad bell <aviatorbell(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Online Piet database
Hey what am I doing in that picture!! I checked out the pic of Mike Cuy's Piet on the link web sight and I am in the picture, talking to Mike, (the high and tight haircut on the left) and Dad is the one in the Grey t-shirt with his back to the camera. --------------------------------- No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Online Piet database
From: Hans Vander Voort <hans.vander.voort(at)alfalaval.com>
Date: Jan 24, 2007
As with any data base it has its limitations. This one is partly based on FAA records and for the FAA register the builder is you. (not pietenpol) So to fix this I run three queries, one on "Pietenpol" one for "Air Camper" and one Aircamper Dumped them all in a spread sheet and removed duplicates 588 Pietenpol airplanes, not all active (See attached file: 588 pietenpol air campers.xls) Hans "Bill Church" To Sent by: owner-pietenpol-l cc ist-server@matron ics.com Subject Pietenpol-List: Online Piet database 01/24/2007 09:58 AM Please respond to pietenpol-list@ma tronics.com Hi guys (and gals), Just stumbled onto this website that has a bunch of Piet photos (lots of them hi-res), and even more Piet registration info. If you have photos of any of the planes listed, you can submit your photo for all to share. I just posted a couple of Canadian Piets that I had photos of. Take a look and see if your plane is there. Not sure how you would add your plane if it's not listed, though. http://www.airport-data.com/search/search2.html?field=model&code=pietenpol Bill C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Online Piet database
Date: Jan 24, 2007
Corky is now immortalized in cyberspace in the photo with 41CC on that page. I assumed that the photo was taken by Isabelle, but if not- sorry. Oscar Zuniga San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags(at)hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net _________________________________________________________________ Get Hilary Duffs homepage with her photos, music, and more. http://celebrities.live.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 24, 2007
From: shad bell <aviatorbell(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Online Piet database
Hey guys, I finnaly got a picture of Dad's Piet posted on this site. This was the infamous day (sat of brodhead 2006) when the Fords beat the Chevys. Engine problems plagued me about 45 min after this picture was taken, then for the rest of the day untill we trailered her home. Look at the listings for N92GB. Enjoy, Shad http://www.airport-data.com/search/search2.html?field=model&code=pietenpol --------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Catdesigns" <catdesigns(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Online Piet database
Date: Jan 24, 2007
Shad, I see you have a fixed tailwheel. How well does it taxi on pavement? Any operational issues with a fixed wheel? It would certainly lighten things up back there. Chris Tracy Sacramento, Ca Website at http://www.Westcoastpiet.com ----- Original Message ----- From: shad bell To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 3:32 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Online Piet database Hey guys, I finnaly got a picture of Dad's Piet posted on this site. This was the infamous day (sat of brodhead 2006) when the Fords beat the Chevys. Engine problems plagued me about 45 min after this picture was taken, then for the rest of the day untill we trailered her home. Look at the listings for N92GB. Enjoy, Shad http://www.airport-data.com/search/search2.html?field=model&code=piet enpol ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Whaley" <MerlinFAC(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Fly-In in Central Florida... seeking Piets & other
interesting airplanes
Date: Jan 25, 2007
Hi Ben, Baby Ace? That ain't no Piet! hehehe Actually I like the Corbin planes a lot... Kristin and I saw a Junior Ace at Oshkosh and REALLY liked it, I hope that Mr. Wood can keep the Ace line going and growing for a long time. Certainly hope you can make it. That reminds me, if you see Jim Webb soon, please ask him if he can bring his Piet if possible... we may have several other Corvair aircraft there as well. Spread the word! :) -Mike Mike Whaley merlin@ov-10bronco.net Webmaster, OV-10 Bronco Association http://www.ov-10bronco.net/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ben Charvet" <bcharvet(at)bellsouth.net> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 7:29 PM Subject: [piet] Re: Pietenpol-List: Fly-In in Central Florida... seeking Piets & other interesting airplanes > > My Pietenpol won't be able to make it (still a few years away from > flight), but I may be able to come in my Baby Ace. I bought it from a > guy in my EAA chapter (866), and it was built in 1955. Not too exotic, > but a homebuilt that old has to be a classic. I haven't flown it yet, > cause I'm one test ride away from my BFR and tailwheel endorsement. If > I get a chance to get in some flight practice and the weather looks good > I'll head your way. > > Ben Charvet > Mims, Fl > > Mike Whaley wrote: > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Whaley" <MerlinFAC(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Fly-In in Central Florida... seeking Piets & other
interesting airplanes
Date: Jan 25, 2007
Hehehe... not at all... everyone's welcome! Now, if you get bounced by a gaggle of Piets on the way there armed with rolls of air-to-air toilet paper, well... :) -Mike Mike Whaley merlin@ov-10bronco.net Webmaster, OV-10 Bronco Association http://www.ov-10bronco.net/ > > We Cessna drivers won't be turned away by a squadron of Piets if we try to > fly in will we? > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CapnAvid(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 25, 2007
Subject: Central Fla Piet fly-in
Mike Whately Central Fla Piet fly-in; when and where? I'm at Sun-n-Fun volunteering and would join you if not too far away--no airplane, just me as a builder. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 25, 2007
From: shad bell <aviatorbell(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Taxing with a fixed tailwheel
Chris, Dad went that route to save all the weight he could back there. He is about 220 and I am About 180lbs. The wing is set back 4 inches I think and engine mount is a couple inches longer than plans. It is definitly eaiser to taxi a Champ or Cub or anything with a steerable tailwheel, but a hell of a lot less fun...ha ha ha. It took us longer to get good at taxing NX92GB than it did to learn to fly it. It sure turns heads when you roll up on the ramp and are goosing the throtle holding full down elevator and mashing full rudder and brake to turn. Everybody looks and says "What in the hell is that guy doing?!!!" (Except the older guys who have flown planes with tail skids) We did go through a few tailwheels before we figured out it needs ball bearings, industrial castor with sleeve bushing did not last and the wheel split in half, steel wheel makes a lot of noise and still wears too fast on pavement. The 2 1/2 in wheel from wicks or Aircraft spruce works well. You have to think well ahead and know where you want to taxi, especially when exiting a runway on to a narrow taxi way, I had to shut down, unbuckle, and climb out the first time I flew off to a local airport to show it off. I hesitated my turn off the runway and didn't leave enough room. It is fine on grass, it slides on around. The best thing is you touch down strieght and for the most part it will stay there with little inputs. I have landed in 30-40mph quarting gusty crosswind (once, and only out of necesity) and stayed on the asphault runway, so as far as the airplane design, and the fixed tailwheel I feel it is pretty forgiving. If you fly out of busy, controlled, paved airports a sterable wheel would be a lot better, and you would have to change tailwheels a lot less. Shad P.S. Guys, Please don't give me the credit for building 92GB, it is Dads airplane and he built 99% of all the parts on it, I just did some riviting and helped out here and there. Although I am very proud of his accomplishment, and I get to fly it he he he. Shad, I see you have a fixed tailwheel. How well does it taxi on pavement? Any operational issues with a fixed wheel? It would certainly lighten things up back there. Chris Tracy Sacramento, Ca Website at http://www.Westcoastpiet.com http://www.airport-data.com/search/search2.html?field=model&code=pietenpol --------------------------------- Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Catdesigns" <catdesigns(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Taxing with a fixed tailwheel
Date: Jan 25, 2007
Thanks Shad, that's exactly the advice I was looking for. I will stick with my sterable tailwheel for now as I doubt I will land on grass very much. Do they even have grass runways in California? Good to have a great flight report as it's always something I have wondered about. Tell your Dad he did a great job. Chris Tracy Sacramento, Ca Website at http://www.Westcoastpiet.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Whaley" <MerlinFAC(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Central Fla Piet fly-in
Date: Jan 26, 2007
Valkaria airport (X59) on Feb. 17th. It's not a Piet-specific fly-in, though it sounds like we'll probably have a couple Piets there (hopefully more!) Full info available here: http://www.mlbpilots.org/ValkariaAirFest/ -Mike Mike Whaley merlin@ov-10bronco.net Webmaster, OV-10 Bronco Association http://www.ov-10bronco.net/ Central Fla Piet fly-in; when and where? I'm at Sun-n-Fun volunteering and would join you if not too far away--no airplane, just me as a builder. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: update on 41CC
Date: Jan 26, 2007
NX41CC is back in the air. Three successful touch and goes shortly before noon today. I wasn't there but Charlie says she handles nicely with just a touch of heaviness on the right wing. More testing as weather allows, but not out of the pattern yet. Life is good. It's Friday. Hope Corky is now in possession of an Aeronca. Oscar Zuniga San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags(at)hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net _________________________________________________________________ Valentines Day -- Shop for gifts that spell L-O-V-E at MSN Shopping http://shopping.msn.com/content/shp/?ctId=8323,ptnrid=37,ptnrdata=24095&tcode=wlmtagline ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: update on 41CC
Date: Jan 26, 2007
From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com>
Great News, Oscar! I'm sure ol' Corky is pleased. Jack Phillips Shivering in chilly North Carolina and hoping for warmer weather tomorrow so i can do some flying -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Oscar Zuniga Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 3:00 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: update on 41CC NX41CC is back in the air. Three successful touch and goes shortly before noon today. I wasn't there but Charlie says she handles nicely with just a touch of heaviness on the right wing. More testing as weather allows, but not out of the pattern yet. Life is good. It's Friday. Hope Corky is now in possession of an Aeronca. Oscar Zuniga San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags(at)hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net _________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: update on 41CC
Date: Jan 26, 2007
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Congratulations, Oscar ! Have a cigar for us, okay ? Mike C. PS-- anyone get a Corkyreport ? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 26, 2007
From: Tim Willis <timothywillis(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: update on 41CC
Oscar, That's super. Tim -----Original Message----- >From: Oscar Zuniga <taildrags(at)hotmail.com> >Sent: Jan 26, 2007 1:59 PM >To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Pietenpol-List: update on 41CC > > >NX41CC is back in the air. Three successful touch and goes shortly before >noon today. I wasn't there but Charlie says she handles nicely with just a >touch of heaviness on the right wing. More testing as weather allows, but >not out of the pattern yet. > >Life is good. It's Friday. Hope Corky is now in possession of an Aeronca. > >Oscar Zuniga >San Antonio, TX >mailto: taildrags(at)hotmail.com >website at http://www.flysquirrel.net > >_________________________________________________________________ >Valentines Day -- Shop for gifts that spell L-O-V-E at MSN Shopping >http://shopping.msn.com/content/shp/?ctId=8323,ptnrid=37,ptnrdata=24095&tcode=wlmtagline > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 26, 2007
From: del magsam <farmerdel(at)rocketmail.com>
Subject: update on 41CC (the weather)
How cold is it? we had a nice warm day at 30 degrees, planes were out everywhere. I had to work on my house watching them fly over.... Del "Phillips, Jack" wrote: Jack Phillips Shivering in chilly North Carolina and hoping for warmer weather tomorrow so i can do some flying Del-New Richmond, Wi "farmerdel(at)rocketmail.com" --------------------------------- TV dinner still cooling? Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Isablcorky(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 26, 2007
Subject: Re: update on 41CC
Corky is in Souix 'city Iowa on his way to Fargo to get his plane. Isablc ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Cold Weather Building
From: "Glenn Thomas" <glennthomas(at)flyingwood.com>
Date: Jan 26, 2007
Chris, Took your post to heart and went to Home Depot. Got a 45000 BTU, 2 burner, propane heater for 60 bucks. Immediately put it together and got the shed from 8.6F to 82F in about 25 minutes on low. Runs on a regular gas grill tank. They have another one that has one burner , 15000 BTUs, for 29 bucks. Once the place is warmed up I could probably fall back to 1 burner and crack a window. Burns clean and my work shed is warmer than the house! Just curious how long a tank lasts. -------- Glenn Thomas N????? http://www.flyingwood.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=90744#90744 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 26, 2007
From: Jim Markle <jim_markle(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Cold Weather Building
I once had one of those Home Depot two burner heaters and a tank lasted about a day and a half. But I kept it on the highest setting. But...after 5 days without electricity last week because of a sever ice storm in NE OK, I have become EXTREMELY aware of (possible) carbon monoxide generating heating devices. One of my neighbors and her kids just got out of the hospital because of carbon monoxide poisoning.... Please add another $20 to that $60 investment and buy a carbon monoxide monitor...please... JM -----Original Message----- >From: Glenn Thomas <glennthomas(at)flyingwood.com> >Sent: Jan 26, 2007 9:10 PM >To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Pietenpol-List: Cold Weather Building > > >Chris, >Took your post to heart and went to Home Depot. Got a 45000 BTU, 2 burner, propane heater for 60 bucks. Immediately put it together and got the shed from 8.6F to 82F in about 25 minutes on low. Runs on a regular gas grill tank. They have another one that has one burner , 15000 BTUs, for 29 bucks. Once the place is warmed up I could probably fall back to 1 burner and crack a window. Burns clean and my work shed is warmer than the house! Just curious how long a tank lasts. > >-------- >Glenn Thomas >N????? >http://www.flyingwood.com > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=90744#90744 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Cold Weather Building
From: "Glenn Thomas" <glennthomas(at)flyingwood.com>
Date: Jan 26, 2007
Jim, That is an excellent idea. I was planning on keeping the window open a little and opening the door frequently but your suggestion is a more scientific solution to that guessing game. Thanks -------- Glenn Thomas N????? http://www.flyingwood.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=90756#90756 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 26, 2007
From: KMHeide <kmheidecpo(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: update on 41CC
CorkyReport....... Just received a telephone call from him indicating he is in Sioux City, Iowa. I hope he is not down wind of the stock yards...Yes.....he is not liking the cold, snow and wind.... Ken H. Fargo, ND Blue Boy Owner (Champ Defender) "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC]" wrote: Congratulations, Oscar ! Have a cigar for us, okay ? Mike C. PS-- anyone get a Corkyreport ? --------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Catdesigns" <catdesigns(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Cold Weather Building
Date: Jan 26, 2007
Glen, It all depends on how much you have to use it. I cycle mine on and off as I get to cold. My last tank lasted about a month and a half but I used it a lot. Around here a BBQ tank cost $15 to fill. Seems like a cheap way to go for me. Does the instructions have a flow rate in it? You could calculate the hours per tank. It also works better when the tank is full.Your probably right that you could go down to 1 burner to maintain the heat and save cost. I think I will go and see if HD has any here. All you need now is to get your self a bag of marshmallows. Isn't it fun to be hotter then the house. My wife gives me grief because I wont let her keep the house that warm. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glenn Thomas" <glennthomas(at)flyingwood.com> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 7:10 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Cold Weather Building > > > Chris, > Took your post to heart and went to Home Depot. Got a 45000 BTU, 2 > burner, propane heater for 60 bucks. Immediately put it together and got > the shed from 8.6F to 82F in about 25 minutes on low. Runs on a regular > gas grill tank. They have another one that has one burner , 15000 BTUs, > for 29 bucks. Once the place is warmed up I could probably fall back to 1 > burner and crack a window. Burns clean and my work shed is warmer than > the house! Just curious how long a tank lasts. > > -------- > Glenn Thomas > N????? > http://www.flyingwood.com > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=90744#90744 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Catdesigns" <catdesigns(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Cold Weather Building
Date: Jan 26, 2007
I frequently take my digital carbon dioxide detector out in the garage to do air sampling and it never registers anything. I sometimes wonder if the thing is working. I think I will by another one just to test it. Fear of carbon monoxide is one of the reasons I cycle it on and off. My garage is a bit drafty so I'm sure it helps circulate the air. PLEASE everyone listen to Jim and get a carbon dioxide tester and test it for your self. Speaking of Jim, did Jim finally get back to working on his plane? Chris Tracy Sacramento, Ca Website at http://www.Westcoastpiet.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Markle" <jim_markle(at)mindspring.com> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 8:03 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Cold Weather Building > > > I once had one of those Home Depot two burner heaters and a tank lasted > about a day and a half. But I kept it on the highest setting. > > But...after 5 days without electricity last week because of a sever ice > storm in NE OK, I have become EXTREMELY aware of (possible) carbon > monoxide generating heating devices. One of my neighbors and her kids > just got out of the hospital because of carbon monoxide poisoning.... > > Please add another $20 to that $60 investment and buy a carbon monoxide > monitor...please... > > JM > > > -----Original Message----- >>From: Glenn Thomas <glennthomas(at)flyingwood.com> >>Sent: Jan 26, 2007 9:10 PM >>To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >>Subject: Pietenpol-List: Cold Weather Building >> >> >> >>Chris, >>Took your post to heart and went to Home Depot. Got a 45000 BTU, 2 >>burner, propane heater for 60 bucks. Immediately put it together and got >>the shed from 8.6F to 82F in about 25 minutes on low. Runs on a regular >>gas grill tank. They have another one that has one burner , 15000 BTUs, >>for 29 bucks. Once the place is warmed up I could probably fall back to 1 >>burner and crack a window. Burns clean and my work shed is warmer than >>the house! Just curious how long a tank lasts. >> >>-------- >>Glenn Thomas >>N????? >>http://www.flyingwood.com >> >> >> >> >>Read this topic online here: >> >>http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=90744#90744 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 27, 2007
From: Larry Rice <rice(at)iapdatacom.net>
Subject: Propane Heater
I found one that is catalytic & has an oxygen sensor that shuts it down when oxygen is short, which is when you tend to get significant carbon monoxide. Larry the micromong guy -- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 27, 2007
From: del magsam <farmerdel(at)rocketmail.com>
Subject: Re: Cold Weather Building
A couple of years ago, I was working on my engine on the plane in a non insulated hangar. I made a 10 x 10 plastic pvc pipe frame with plastic sheet stretched between the pipes. hung the thing from the ceiling, and then hung plastic all of way around the edges. when I went there to work I plugged in the knipko 100,000 btu heater to get it to 80 degrees in about 5 minutes, and then maintained it at about 60 degrees with the lp "sunflower" heater. I didn't even use the whole tank for the project. But BEWARE...do not leave it unattended or get it close to the plastic. Del Catdesigns wrote: Glen, It all depends on how much you have to use it. I cycle mine on and off as I get to cold. My last tank lasted about a month and a half but I used it a lot. Around here a BBQ tank cost $15 to fill. Seems like a cheap way to go for me. Does the instructions have a flow rate in it? You could calculate the hours per tank. It also works better when the tank is full.Your probably right that you could go down to 1 burner to maintain the heat and save cost. I think I will go and see if HD has any here. All you need now is to get your self a bag of marshmallows. Isn't it fun to be hotter then the house. My wife gives me grief because I wont let her keep the house that warm. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glenn Thomas" Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 7:10 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Cold Weather Building > > > Chris, > Took your post to heart and went to Home Depot. Got a 45000 BTU, 2 > burner, propane heater for 60 bucks. Immediately put it together and got > the shed from 8.6F to 82F in about 25 minutes on low. Runs on a regular > gas grill tank. They have another one that has one burner , 15000 BTUs, > for 29 bucks. Once the place is warmed up I could probably fall back to 1 > burner and crack a window. Burns clean and my work shed is warmer than > the house! Just curious how long a tank lasts. > > -------- > Glenn Thomas > N????? > http://www.flyingwood.com > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=90744#90744 > > > Del-New Richmond, Wi "farmerdel(at)rocketmail.com" --------------------------------- Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast with theYahoo! Search weather shortcut. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Cold Weather Building
From: "dwilson" <marwilson(at)charter.net>
Date: Jan 27, 2007
These posts have been pretty interesting to read. I used an electric heater in my attached insulated garage. Could have bought a new Cessna for what I paid the utility company. I now have a natural gas furnace. The furnace is 45,000 btu and is vented to the outside through a forced air chimney. Even in the garage with a forced air furnace I have a CO (Carbon Monoxide) detector. You can purchase a very reliable CO detector for less than $ 25 at most discount and hardware stores. Seems like very cheap insurance. Click on this link to learn more... http://www.nfpa.org/itemDetail.asp?categoryID=280&itemID=18270&URL=Research%20&%20Reports/Fact%20sheets/Safety%20in%20the%20home/Carbon%20monoxide%20poisoning&cookie%5Ftest=1 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=90792#90792 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 27, 2007
From: Michael Fisher <mfisher(at)gci.net>
Subject: Re: Testing CO Detectors
Cold Weather Builders, Check your digital electronic CO detectors for operational status and sensitivity by lighting a stick of incense in a safe container about a foot below the unit and leaving it for an hour or so.  The reading should show anywhere between 5 and 75 parts per million.  Incense burns about as dirty as an old Continental with a leaky needle valve.  DO NOT test your detector by placing it near an engine exhaust. Mike Fisher Talkeetna, Alaska  I frequently take my digital carbon dioxide detector out in the > garage to do > air sampling and it never registers anything.  I sometimes wonder > if the > thing is working. I think I will by another one just to test it. > Fear of > carbon monoxide is one of the reasons I cycle it on and off. > > My garage is a bit drafty so I'm sure it helps circulate the air.  > PLEASE > everyone listen to Jim and get a carbon dioxide tester and test it > for your > self. -- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: update on 41CC
Date: Jan 27, 2007
Well, it was in the mid 60s today, clear and nice, the new brake linings were all cured and full braking effect available, and Charlie took the airplane out of ground effect and into the pattern. Quite different from the slight right wing heaviness in ground effect, he found that in the pattern he had to hold the stick with both hands at one point, hard left aileron, due to excessive wash-in on the starboard wing. But we have plenty of threads on the forward lift strut fork end to make adjustments, so that's next. The engine pulled 2250 RPM in climb with that 72x42 Hegy prop, climbing at 50 MPH. I have not verified the mechanical tach against an optical one, so I'm feeling real good about the engine and prop doing just about as good as you can expect. It runs and sounds strong and smooth. Life is good ;o) Oscar Zuniga San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags(at)hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net _________________________________________________________________ FREE online classifieds from Windows Live Expo buy and sell with people you know ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: update on 41CC
Date: Jan 27, 2007
Congrats Oscar! Pretty exciting. Keep us posted and get some in flight photos you can share with us. Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 7:58 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: update on 41CC > > > Well, it was in the mid 60s today, clear and nice, the new brake linings > were all cured and full braking effect available, and Charlie took the > airplane out of ground effect and into the pattern. Quite different from > the slight right wing heaviness in ground effect, he found that in the > pattern he had to hold the stick with both hands at one point, hard left > aileron, due to excessive wash-in on the starboard wing. But we have > plenty of threads on the forward lift strut fork end to make adjustments, > so that's next. > > The engine pulled 2250 RPM in climb with that 72x42 Hegy prop, climbing at > 50 MPH. I have not verified the mechanical tach against an optical one, > so I'm feeling real good about the engine and prop doing just about as > good as you can expect. It runs and sounds strong and smooth. > > Life is good ;o) > > Oscar Zuniga > San Antonio, TX > mailto: taildrags(at)hotmail.com > website at http://www.flysquirrel.net > > _________________________________________________________________ > FREE online classifieds from Windows Live Expo - buy and sell with people > you know > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 27, 2007
From: Jim Markle <jim_markle(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Cold Weather Building
Thanks Chris! Well, no, I'm not back to work on it yet. Been out of work (unemployed) for a couple months and frankly haven't had the motivation to even look at it. But I WILL some day. I have several interviews going and expect to get back in the swing of important things (like my Pietenpol!) soon. I do get a bit sad though thinking about how nice it would have been to be finishing up right now so I can fly it this summer. Hey, that will just make it that much sweeter when it DOES happen! In the meantime, I'm living the aviator's dream...vicariously...I just read Oscar's summary of 41CC's flight in the pattern and my arms are still sore from holding in so much left aileron...Hopefully he'll get the struts adjusted so I can imagine a nice gentle flight around the pattern. What's really been interesting is how many of my Pietenpol friends have been a key part of me NOT getting really depressed during an otherwise "challenging" period of my life. Very nice. And I'm glad there has been so much discussion/thought about heaters. I know everyone is careful, but on this stuff you can't be TOO careful! Hope everyone's staying warm! Jim in Northeastern Oklahoma...where all that darn ice is now melting...I've never seen SO much mud! -----Original Message----- >From: Catdesigns <catdesigns(at)comcast.net> >Sent: Jan 27, 2007 12:44 AM >To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Cold Weather Building > > >I frequently take my digital carbon dioxide detector out in the garage to do >air sampling and it never registers anything. I sometimes wonder if the >thing is working. I think I will by another one just to test it. Fear of >carbon monoxide is one of the reasons I cycle it on and off. > >My garage is a bit drafty so I'm sure it helps circulate the air. PLEASE >everyone listen to Jim and get a carbon dioxide tester and test it for your >self. > >Speaking of Jim, did Jim finally get back to working on his plane? > >Chris Tracy >Sacramento, Ca >Website at http://www.Westcoastpiet.com > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Jim Markle" <jim_markle(at)mindspring.com> >To: >Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 8:03 PM >Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Cold Weather Building > > >> >> >> I once had one of those Home Depot two burner heaters and a tank lasted >> about a day and a half. But I kept it on the highest setting. >> >> But...after 5 days without electricity last week because of a sever ice >> storm in NE OK, I have become EXTREMELY aware of (possible) carbon >> monoxide generating heating devices. One of my neighbors and her kids >> just got out of the hospital because of carbon monoxide poisoning.... >> >> Please add another $20 to that $60 investment and buy a carbon monoxide >> monitor...please... >> >> JM >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >>>From: Glenn Thomas <glennthomas(at)flyingwood.com> >>>Sent: Jan 26, 2007 9:10 PM >>>To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >>>Subject: Pietenpol-List: Cold Weather Building >>> >>> >>> >>>Chris, >>>Took your post to heart and went to Home Depot. Got a 45000 BTU, 2 >>>burner, propane heater for 60 bucks. Immediately put it together and got >>>the shed from 8.6F to 82F in about 25 minutes on low. Runs on a regular >>>gas grill tank. They have another one that has one burner , 15000 BTUs, >>>for 29 bucks. Once the place is warmed up I could probably fall back to 1 >>>burner and crack a window. Burns clean and my work shed is warmer than >>>the house! Just curious how long a tank lasts. >>> >>>-------- >>>Glenn Thomas >>>N????? >>>http://www.flyingwood.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>Read this topic online here: >>> >>>http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=90744#90744 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 27, 2007
From: KMHeide <kmheidecpo(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: A corksickle update........
Members of the List: Corky arrived with his son around 1:00 pm Fargo time (amidst zero temperatures, strong winds, Less then 5 miles visability, windchill of 20 below) to greet his new found project.. the 42' Blue Boy Defender Aeronca Champ. He arrived excited yet tired of the long trip up. "Us Yankees handle the cold much better than them southerners"...... Corky, his son David, me and my daughters started up the salamander heater and started the work of removing the tail section. Everything went smoothly but with the cold inside the hanger, it made a 10 minute job much longer. We kept working with rotation between heater time and planning time. Finally, we moved the trailer into the hanger along side the plane for loading. Created a wood platform for the front gear and then another platform for the tail. With the plane parallel to the trailer, lifted the tail up onto the rear of the trailer. Then, we planned on lifting the front of the Defender (one gear leg at a time) onto the trailer with hopes of sliding the wheels across into position/alignment with the trailer. Since the wood was frozen and had some frost on it, I added more snow to make it slippery for sliding the planes gear across it. Corky and I grabbed one side of the front gear leg and his son David used a dolly on the opposite side to lift that sides' wheel off the floor as we lifted our side. The tail-wheel was kept in place with a block to prevent moving on the rear platform. *(Note - Corky being a young man (80 yrs. old) is extremely strong!!) Together we lifted the entire side of the plane and set the wheel onto the trailer which was about 3 1/2 feet tall! We then walked around and grabbed the side David was on and picked up the wheel and side it the remaining wheel onto the trailer and into position. In summation, we picked up the entire front of the defender and slide it on to the trailer. (We are two strong sons-of- *itches! Don't mess with pietenpol builders!) After this we decided to call it a day. Total time on loading fuselage.....about 4 1/2 hours. Tomorrow....the wings under the fuselage and then strapping everything down. Departure time around 1:00 PM or thereabouts. Photos to follow.... This has been a Corksickle update! He loves winter in North Dakota....Will try and get him to help make snowman tomorrow...before he is completely frozen and can't move! Ken H Fargo, ND --------------------------------- No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 28, 2007
From: Jeff Boatright <jboatri(at)emory.edu>
Subject: short Piet movie; Wayne's BFR
Wayne took and passed his BFR in the Piet yesterday. The video is at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFZjsCnu__g It was a fairly warm day (maybe in the low 50s), but fairly windy, and due to the runway slope, they had a quartering tailwind. You'll see the effects of this in the ground run and lift off. On landing, of course, it was a headwind, and Wayne really stuck it at the numbers. It's hard to tell in the video, but that was a short landing as the field slopes very steeply at the other end, too. Anyway, hope this gives you a little smile on a cold Sunday morning! Jeff ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: A corksickle update........
Date: Jan 28, 2007
Ken, Thanks for the update. I think we were all wondering how he's coming along. It's great to hear he's really enjoying the winter wonderland. What more could he ask for, other than a nice long flight over the winter scene in a Piet. I think he deserves one. Gene This has been a Corksickle update! He loves winter in North Dakota....Will try and get him to help make snowman tomorrow...before he is completely frozen and can't move! Ken H Fargo, ND ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 28, 2007
From: Larry Rice <rice(at)iapdatacom.net>
Subject: Enforced "no build" Time
Jim, Keep your chin up. We all go through times that are difficult for various reasons. My project has been at a standstill due to moving and tuition & etc for 2 kids. One gets out of school in a couple months and should be supporting herself, and I'm really looking forward to it. :) Just roll with the punches & it'll come out allright. Larry the micromong guy -- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <harvey.rule(at)sympatico.ca>
Subject: Re: Cold Weather Building
Date: Jan 28, 2007
After the ice storm of 97/98 up here in Ottawa we changed our fire place to a gas style instead of wood burning and at the flick of a switch I have instant heat even if the hydro goes off.Now mind you there won't be any blower from the fire place if the hydro is off but you can get enough heat from it to survive.Sort of like camping out.You just bring your sleeping bags down and sleep in front of the fire place.Nothing to do with Pietenpols but everything to do with survival and carbonmonoxide poisoning.There won't be any danger from this system. >From: Jim Markle <jim_markle(at)mindspring.com> >Reply-To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Cold Weather Building >Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:03:09 -0600 (GMT-06:00) > > > >I once had one of those Home Depot two burner heaters and a tank lasted >about a day and a half. But I kept it on the highest setting. > >But...after 5 days without electricity last week because of a sever ice >storm in NE OK, I have become EXTREMELY aware of (possible) carbon monoxide >generating heating devices. One of my neighbors and her kids just got out >of the hospital because of carbon monoxide poisoning.... > >Please add another $20 to that $60 investment and buy a carbon monoxide >monitor...please... > >JM > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Glenn Thomas <glennthomas(at)flyingwood.com> > >Sent: Jan 26, 2007 9:10 PM > >To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > >Subject: Pietenpol-List: Cold Weather Building > > > > > > >Chris, > >Took your post to heart and went to Home Depot. Got a 45000 BTU, 2 >burner, propane heater for 60 bucks. Immediately put it together and got >the shed from 8.6F to 82F in about 25 minutes on low. Runs on a regular >gas grill tank. They have another one that has one burner , 15000 BTUs, >for 29 bucks. Once the place is warmed up I could probably fall back to 1 >burner and crack a window. Burns clean and my work shed is warmer than the >house! Just curious how long a tank lasts. > > > >-------- > >Glenn Thomas > >N????? > >http://www.flyingwood.com > > > > > > > > > >Read this topic online here: > > > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=90744#90744 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <harvey.rule(at)sympatico.ca>
Subject: A corksickle update........
Date: Jan 28, 2007
Go Corky!Good luck on the return trip our peayers are with you man! >From: KMHeide <kmheidecpo(at)yahoo.com> >Reply-To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >To: Pietenpol >Subject: Pietenpol-List: A corksickle update........ >Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:01:31 -0800 (PST) > >Members of the List: > > Corky arrived with his son around 1:00 pm Fargo time (amidst zero >temperatures, strong winds, Less then 5 miles visability, windchill of 20 >below) to greet his new found project.. the 42' Blue Boy Defender Aeronca >Champ. He arrived excited yet tired of the long trip up. "Us Yankees handle >the cold much better than them southerners"...... > > Corky, his son David, me and my daughters started up the salamander >heater and started the work of removing the tail section. Everything went >smoothly but with the cold inside the hanger, it made a 10 minute job much >longer. We kept working with rotation between heater time and planning >time. Finally, we moved the trailer into the hanger along side the plane >for loading. > > Created a wood platform for the front gear and then another platform for >the tail. With the plane parallel to the trailer, lifted the tail up onto >the rear of the trailer. Then, we planned on lifting the front of the >Defender (one gear leg at a time) onto the trailer with hopes of sliding >the wheels across into position/alignment with the trailer. Since the wood >was frozen and had some frost on it, I added more snow to make it slippery >for sliding the planes gear across it. Corky and I grabbed one side of the >front gear leg and his son David used a dolly on the opposite side to lift >that sides' wheel off the floor as we lifted our side. The tail-wheel was >kept in place with a block to prevent moving on the rear platform. *(Note - >Corky being a young man (80 yrs. old) is extremely strong!!) Together we >lifted the entire side of the plane and set the wheel onto the trailer >which was about 3 1/2 feet tall! We then walked around and grabbed the >side David was on and picked > up the wheel and side it the remaining wheel onto the trailer and into >position. In summation, we picked up the entire front of the defender and >slide it on to the trailer. (We are two strong sons-of- *itches! Don't mess >with pietenpol builders!) > > After this we decided to call it a day. Total time on loading >fuselage.....about 4 1/2 hours. Tomorrow....the wings under the fuselage >and then strapping everything down. Departure time around 1:00 PM or >thereabouts. > > Photos to follow.... > > This has been a Corksickle update! He loves winter in North >Dakota....Will try and get him to help make snowman tomorrow...before he is >completely frozen and can't move! > > Ken H > Fargo, ND > > >--------------------------------- >No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go >with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 28, 2007
Subject: Re: Enforced "no build" Time OT
From: John Hofmann <jhofmann(at)reesgroupinc.com>
Hey Larry! I remember when those girls were about three feet tall with you in the 150! Hope all is well. I have some books of yours I found in my last move. -john- --------------------------------- John Hofmann Vice-President, Information Technology The Rees Group, Inc. 2810 Crossroads Drive, Ste 3800 Madison, WI 53718 Phone: 608-443-2468, ext. 150 Fax: 608-443-2474 Email: jhofmann(at)reesgroupinc.com > > > Jim, > > Keep your chin up. We all go through times that are difficult for > various reasons. My project has been at a standstill due to moving and > tuition & etc for 2 kids. One gets out of school in a couple months and > should be supporting herself, and I'm really looking forward to it. :) > Just roll with the punches & it'll come out allright. > > Larry the micromong guy > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: propane heater/was Cold Weather Building
Date: Jan 28, 2007
Regarding the use of propane shop heaters. When we lived in Oregon I bought one of those "orange torpedo" type heaters with electronic spark ignition and used it with a standard barbeque grill type propane tank. I seem to recall it being 75,000 btu/hr. A standard gas grill type propane tank is nominal 20 lbs. or 4 gal. of propane, which has a heating value of about 71,000 btu/hr/gal. As you can see, with a 75,000 btu/hr heater you have a little less than 4 hours of blowing and going at full blast. I used to use it to warm the garage up (15 min. or so), then fire it up again every hour or as needed to take the chill off. Sucker was too loud to run continuously in there even if I had wanted to, but it sure was warm when the heater was running. I never worried about CO or CO2 because my garage door had cracks that you could drive a VW through, all around it, and I never ran the heater unattended or for extended periods. And hey, Jim Markle- what line of work are you in? If you're in science or engineering or anything related (chemistry, geology, etc.)- we are always looking for engineers, scientists, and technicians at Southwest Research. Careers webpage at http://www.swri.org/hr/default.htm Oscar Zuniga San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags(at)hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net _________________________________________________________________ Valentines Day -- Shop for gifts that spell L-O-V-E at MSN Shopping http://shopping.msn.com/content/shp/?ctId=8323,ptnrid=37,ptnrdata=24095&tcode=wlmtagline ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "MICHAEL SILVIUS" <M.Silvius(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Cold Weather Building
Date: Jan 28, 2007
this rig cost me a couple of hundred to set up, mostly the insulated pipe to run through the ceiling. The kit for the barrel stove was about $70, barel rescued from behind the local Catterpillar dealer. fuel is mostly pallate material collected behind big box stores, and construction site dumpster diving. 3 yrs and I never had to pay for fuel for it yet. keeps my uninsulated shop in T shirrt conditions till the ouside temps drop below zero. then a sweat shirt is all we need. I know in the republic of Kalifornia where you have to get a burn permit for a Hibachy you could not do this but then you likely don need to either. Michael in Maine ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 28, 2007
From: Dave and Connie <dmatt(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: Cold Weather Building
My father used to have a similar stove in the cellar. His was a Sotz with a double barrel. The top barrel sucked out so much heat that he had to be careful to not put a smoke shelf in the chimney. He put in an old water heater with a convction loop into the stove and put that in series with the house water heater. It had a pressure vent to the outdoors and blew off most mornings. With an all electric house it made a huge difference. Before we were married my wife to be was visisting and mentioned that she was cold. It took about 10 minutes to put the whole house to 80 or so. Dave At 06:38 PM 1/28/2007, MICHAEL SILVIUS wrote: >this rig cost me a couple of hundred to set up, mostly the insulated pipe to >run through the ceiling. The kit for the barrel stove was about $70, barel >rescued from behind the local Catterpillar dealer. > >fuel is mostly pallate material collected behind big box stores, and >construction site dumpster diving. 3 yrs and I never had to pay for fuel for >it yet. > >keeps my uninsulated shop in T shirrt conditions till the ouside temps drop >below zero. >then a sweat shirt is all we need. > >I know in the republic of Kalifornia where you have to get a burn permit for >a Hibachy you could not do this but then you likely don need to either. > >Michael in Maine ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "MICHAEL SILVIUS" <M.Silvius(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Cold Weather Building
Date: Jan 29, 2007
heres the one I have: http://www.vogelzang.com/barrel_stoves.htm If I leave the door open it gets going to fast. too much draft. it is a leaky thing so even with the damper shut she draws real good. Sometimes on real low wind days if I open the door to soon when its all shut down low it will belch out a cloud of smoke. But my shop is quite drafty so its not a big deal. Runing it with the door open is not real efficient and runs through fuel way to fast. I try to keep the fire in the back 3rd of the barrel and it keeps thing runing nicely without to much belching. michael ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 29, 2007
Subject: Re: Cold Weather Building
From: "Glenn W. Thomas" <glennthomas(at)flyingwood.com>
Do you line the bottom of the Vogelzang with fire brick or is there a grate or something? That looks like a great way to heat up a building. > > > heres the one I have: > > http://www.vogelzang.com/barrel_stoves.htm > > If I leave the door open it gets going to fast. too much draft. it is a > leaky thing so even with the damper shut she draws real good. Sometimes on > real low wind days if I open the door to soon when its all shut down low > it > will belch out a cloud of smoke. But my shop is quite drafty so its not a > big deal. Runing it with the door open is not real efficient and runs > through fuel way to fast. > > I try to keep the fire in the back 3rd of the barrel and it keeps thing > runing nicely without to much belching. > > michael > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "MICHAEL SILVIUS" <M.Silvius(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Cold Weather Building
Date: Jan 29, 2007
Glen: Just a bit of sand on the inside of the barrel, couple of 25 lb bags is enough. as you see I also have the cement paver pad under the stove. at first I was concerned but with the sand in the bottom of the barrel the underside remains completey cool to the touch. so there is no issue at all there. I also placed he stove so that it is in the corner of the shop and the stair well comes up around it so it tends do draw cool air in form the garage bellow. michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glenn W. Thomas" <glennthomas(at)flyingwood.com> > Do you line the bottom of the Vogelzang with fire brick or is there a > grate or something? That looks like a great way to heat up a building. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HelsperSew(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 29, 2007
Subject: Source for tailwheel spring
Hi Pieters, Can anyone help with a source for the large coil tail wheel spring? Thanko mucho (that's Spanish for thank you very much). Dan Helsper Poplar Grove, IL. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Terry Hall" <adaairport(at)cableone.net>
Subject: Re: Source for tailwheel spring
Date: Jan 29, 2007
I'm building a Sky Scout with a tail skid. I bought a coil spring at a local farm supply house that normally would go on a gate. I don't know how it will hold up, but that is at least a source. Good luck, Terry Hall, Ada, OK ----- Original Message ----- From: HelsperSew(at)aol.com To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 11:29 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Source for tailwheel spring Hi Pieters, Can anyone help with a source for the large coil tail wheel spring? Thanko mucho (that's Spanish for thank you very much). Dan Helsper Poplar Grove, IL. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Fuel tanks
Date: Jan 29, 2007
I'm checking into building a new fuel tank for my Piet. What grade of aluminum should I use? Has anyone used any other metal for their tanks? I could use extra weight up front so the weight is not a negative factor. I'm changing from a metal prop to a wood one, a loss of about 12 lbs Plus when I pulled my old tank I found 16 lbs of lead the builder had installed in front of the tank. I'm going to mount a battery and a tool box on the firewall and that will help some. Thanks Gene ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 29, 2007
From: Steve Ruse <steve(at)wotelectronics.com>
Subject: Re: Source for tailwheel spring
The day I bought my GN-1, I was doing some taxi practice on a big grass strip (my first time ever in a GN-1 or Piet). At some point, I lost a tailwheel spring. I was in a hurry to get in the air, as I had an 800+ mile trip ahead of me and already felt like I was behind schedule. A couple of us started looking for the spring in the grass, while some helpful guy who I didn't know went to the hardware store to see what he could find. He found a two pack of the exact sprint that was on my tailwheel...I was amazed. It took twenty minutes & $2. If it had been a certified plane, it would have taken three weeks and $150 to get that spring. So I put a new spring on both sides, and zip tied the ends to secure the springs and avoid that problem in the future. No problems since then in ~200hrs of flying. Anyway, I've seen these same springs several times in several different hardware stores since then. The ones I've found come in pairs in a small yellow/white plastic bag, and generally they have at least 4-5 sizes to choose from. I was in Lowes a few days ago and saw them and thought I should pick some up for spares. Terry, I didn't know you were in Ada. I'm in Norman, OK, not too far away. Chet Peek is building a Model A Piet in Norman, and there are at least a couple others in the OKC area. We will have to get together sometime, I would love to see your project. I'm going to go to the Paul's Valley fly-in on Saturday if the weather allows, and the following weekend (February 10th) I'm having a fly-in at the strip where I keep my plane (a few miles south of Norman), you should come out if you aren't busy. Chet Peek will probably be there. Here is some more information if you are interested: http://www.wotelectronics.com/flyin Steve Ruse Norman, OK Quoting Terry Hall : > I'm building a Sky Scout with a tail skid. I bought a coil spring > at a local farm supply house that normally would go on a gate. I > don't know how it will hold up, but that is at least a source. Good > luck, Terry Hall, Ada, OK > ----- Original Message ----- > From: HelsperSew(at)aol.com > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 11:29 AM > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Source for tailwheel spring > > > Hi Pieters, > > Can anyone help with a source for the large coil tail wheel > spring? Thanko mucho (that's Spanish for thank you very much). > > Dan Helsper > Poplar Grove, IL. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "gbowen(at)ptialaska.net" <gbowen(at)ptialaska.net>
Date: Jan 29, 2007
Subject: Fuel tanks
Gene, Mucho simpler to build out of fiberglass and epoxy using the lost foam core method I decribed about 1 year ago. Ask someone in the EAA chapter who's building any composite plane for help. Carving a foam core to fit exactly what you want isn't hard, laminating glass with epoxy over the outside, putting in 1/4 Al blanks for the hard points needed for drains/vent/fills, piece of cake. You simply cut the thing in half, take out the "lost" foam. You got a custom tank, lighter than metal. Gordon Original Message: ----------------- From: Gene and Tammy zharvey(at)bellsouth.net Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:56:47 -0600 Subject: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks I'm checking into building a new fuel tank for my Piet. What grade of aluminum should I use? Has anyone used any other metal for their tanks? I could use extra weight up front so the weight is not a negative factor. I'm changing from a metal prop to a wood one, a loss of about 12 lbs Plus when I pulled my old tank I found 16 lbs of lead the builder had installed in front of the tank. I'm going to mount a battery and a tool box on the firewall and that will help some. Thanks Gene -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web.com Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 29, 2007
From: Jeff Boatright <jboatri(at)emory.edu>
Subject: Re: Source for tailwheel spring
Steve, We went through exactly the same thing on our Piet. The springs are for storm doors and come with their own chains. I like your zip-tie addition. I'll try it. Jeff > >... He found a two pack of the exact sprint that was on my >tailwheel...I was amazed. It took twenty minutes & $2. If it had >been a certified plane, it would have taken three weeks and $150 to >get that spring. > >So I put a new spring on both sides, and zip tied the ends to secure >the springs and avoid that problem in the future. No problems since >then in ~200hrs of flying. > >Anyway, I've seen these same springs several times in several >different hardware stores since then. The ones I've found come in >pairs in a small yellow/white plastic bag, and generally they have >at least 4-5 sizes to choose from. I was in Lowes a few days ago >and saw them and thought I should pick some up for spares. ... -- _____________________________________________________________ Jeffrey H. Boatright, PhD Associate Professor, Emory Eye Center, Atlanta, GA, USA Senior Editor, Molecular Vision, http://www.molvis.org/molvis mailto:jboatri(at)emory.edu ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Source for tailwheel spring
Date: Jan 29, 2007
From: "Bill Church" <eng(at)canadianrogers.com>
Dan, Just did a search of the Matronics List and found the following: http://www.matronics.com/searching/getmsg_script.cgi?INDEX=616679?KEYS= t ail_spring?LISTNAME=Pietenpol?HITNUMBER=23?SERIAL=10362125687?SHOWB UTTON S=YES <http://www.matronics.com/searching/getmsg_script.cgi?INDEX=616679?KEYS tail_spring?LISTNAME=Pietenpol?HITNUMBER=23?SERIAL=10362125687?SHOW BUTTO NS=YES> here's the relevant info, cut and pasted from the above posting (incase the link doesn't work for you): "John Deere sells a spring that's a perfect match for the specs; its part number is T 143444, and it costs about $9.00. Its outer dia. is 1.5in.; full length( no load ) is 6.73" Bill C ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Source for tailwheel spring
From: "Catdesign" <Catdesign(at)intergate.com>
Date: Jan 29, 2007
http://www.mcmaster.com/ I bought two springs, Part Number: 96485K141 and 96485K135. I ended up using the 96485K141 because spring 96485K135 seemed to easy to compress. Look at their webpage to get the information on each spring. Chris Tracy Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=91364#91364 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel tanks
Date: Jan 29, 2007
Thanks for the reply Gordon. Fiberglass was considered as I've built and repaired fiberglass boats for a fair number of years. I discarded the idea for a number of reasons. I actually need more weight not less. I guess the biggest reason is the alcohol that is finding its way into almost all fuel. A real killer on fiberglass tanks. If you use only av gas it shouldn't be a problem for now, but I end up using a lot of auto gas. Thank you Gene in Tennessee (down with the flu) >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > mail2web.com - Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on > Microsoft > Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HelsperSew(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 29, 2007
Subject: Tailwheel spring
Thanks Chris, I just ordered the 96485K141. I had an order ready for Mcmaster Carr anyway today, so I just added it on. I love that place. They have everything under the sun, and you can order 1 bolt or nut if you need it. (and have it the next morning). A lot of my misc. parts in my airplane come from there. Also I have been looking at your posted photos of your tailwheel assembly. I got some good ideas from you. Mine will be a skid plate, with the option of attaching (with pins) a removable tailwheel. At this point it will be a non-steerable tailwheel. We shall see how it goes. Hopefully with good brakes, I won't need the steerable model. Dan Helsper Poplar Grove, IL. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Source for tailwheel spring
Date: Jan 29, 2007
I think different folks are talking about different springs. Unless I'm mistaken, the original request was for a source for the spring that is used in the Pietenpol tail skid design. It's a single large coil in the vertical position. The other responders seem to be talking about steerable tailwheel springs, aka storm door springs, inline with the tailwheel steering cables. Different critters. I believe someone said they got their large coil spring from a farm tractor seat. Oscar Zuniga San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags(at)hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net _________________________________________________________________ >From predictions to trailers, check out the MSN Entertainment Guide to the Academy Awards http://movies.msn.com/movies/oscars2007/?icid=ncoscartagline1 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: McMaster-Carr for just about anything
Date: Jan 29, 2007
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Dan from Poplar Grove is right, McMaster-Carr is amazing--we use them for things we need at work almost every other week and I don't know how they do it but we generally order one day and have the goods the next day. http://www.mcmaster.com/ I needed some high-strength metric bolts for a brake job I was doing on my stepson's car last fall and it had to be a super fine metric thread. Nobody in town carried anything of the sort but McMaster-Carr had them and I had them the next day. Amazing. Come to find out that unlike SAE threads like NC and NF coarse and fine, metric bolts have three or four different thread spacing's and a grade 8 in SAE is not the same as a grade 8 in metric. Learned quite a bit that day. Mike C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "gbowen(at)ptialaska.net" <gbowen(at)ptialaska.net>
Date: Jan 29, 2007
Subject: Re: Fuel tanks
Gene, Fiberglass made using polyester resin is a problem with all sorts of solvents, including normal fuel. But fiberglass tanks made with epoxy have been in service with the canard-pusher guys since Rutan first flew into Osh in the early 70's. If they're done right, they don't leak. But if weight is the consideration, make them out of galvanized steel like my Piete. If fixed my weight problem (I'm 275lbs) with a 0-235 engine, chevy starter, car battery under legs of passenger seat and moved the engine mount forward about 4". With Aeronca wings get about 750'/min. climb, with full 22 gal fuel, my fat carcass, and indicates 105 mph at 3000' with full 2650 rpm power. But love to cruise at 2000 rpm at 75mph indicated, hang the elbow out the side like driving a convertable, fuel burn is about 6 gal/hr Fresh jugs on Lyco gets about 108 hp. Gordon Original Message: ----------------- From: Gene and Tammy zharvey(at)bellsouth.net Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:30:11 -0600 Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks Thanks for the reply Gordon. Fiberglass was considered as I've built and repaired fiberglass boats for a fair number of years. I discarded the idea for a number of reasons. I actually need more weight not less. I guess the biggest reason is the alcohol that is finding its way into almost all fuel. A real killer on fiberglass tanks. If you use only av gas it shouldn't be a problem for now, but I end up using a lot of auto gas. Thank you Gene in Tennessee (down with the flu) >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > mail2web.com - Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on > Microsoft > Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft Windows and Linux web and application hosting - http://link.mail2web.com/myhosting ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Fuel tanks
Date: Jan 29, 2007
From: "Jack T. Textor" <jtextor(at)thepalmergroup.com>
Gordon, At 105 indicated, do you have a concern with control fluter? Jack www.textors.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel tanks
Date: Jan 29, 2007
Gordon, Very interested in your galvanized steel tank. What thickness did you use? How hard was it to work with? I plan on forming my own and then having it welded by someone that knows what their doing. Sounds like you get great performance out of your plane. I'm in the middle of completely going thru my Piet and doing a major on the A-65. I'm not completely happy with the current fuel tank and using a heavier metel would allow me to do away with the lead. As far as fiberglass using polyester resin or epoxy I encourage anyone considering building a fuel tank from fiberglass to check around and do a little investigating pior to building. Boat US is a good source of information on fiberglass fuel tanks as well as many of the homebuilt sites (Avid, Kit Fox ect) that use fiberglass tanks. Fuel with alcohol is a big problem for fiberglass tanks everyone should be awear of.. Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: <gbowen(at)ptialaska.net> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 4:35 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks > > > Gene, > Fiberglass made using polyester resin is a problem with all sorts of > solvents, including normal fuel. But fiberglass tanks made with epoxy > have > been in service with the canard-pusher guys since Rutan first flew into > Osh > in the early 70's. If they're done right, they don't leak. But if weight > is the consideration, make them out of galvanized steel like my Piete. If > fixed my weight problem (I'm 275lbs) with a 0-235 engine, chevy starter, > car battery under legs of passenger seat and moved the engine mount > forward > about 4". With Aeronca wings get about 750'/min. climb, with full 22 gal > fuel, my fat carcass, and indicates 105 mph at 3000' with full 2650 rpm > power. But love to cruise at 2000 rpm at 75mph indicated, hang the elbow > out the side like driving a convertable, fuel burn is about 6 gal/hr > Fresh > jugs on Lyco gets about 108 hp. > Gordon > > Original Message: > ----------------- > From: Gene and Tammy zharvey(at)bellsouth.net > Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:30:11 -0600 > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks > > > > > Thanks for the reply Gordon. > Fiberglass was considered as I've built and repaired fiberglass boats for > a > fair number of years. I discarded the idea for a number of reasons. I > actually need more weight not less. I guess the biggest reason is the > alcohol that is finding its way into almost all fuel. A real killer on > fiberglass tanks. If you use only av gas it shouldn't be a problem for > now, > but I end up using a lot of auto gas. > Thank you > Gene in Tennessee (down with the flu) > >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> mail2web.com - Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on >> Microsoft >> Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft Windows and Linux web and application > hosting - http://link.mail2web.com/myhosting > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rcaprd(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 29, 2007
Subject: Re: Fuel tanks
In a message dated 1/29/2007 1:32:37 PM Central Standard Time, zharvey(at)bellsouth.net writes: Thanks for the reply Gordon. Fiberglass was considered as I've built and repaired fiberglass boats for a fair number of years. I discarded the idea for a number of reasons. I actually need more weight not less. I guess the biggest reason is the alcohol that is finding its way into almost all fuel. A real killer on fiberglass tanks. If you use only av gas it shouldn't be a problem for now, but I end up using a lot of auto gas. Thank you Gene in Tennessee (down with the flu) Gene, I built both my fuel tanks with fiberglass, however, I mistakenly used polyester resin (auto body stuff). Instead of the lost foam method, I built female moulds, and did the 4 ply layups inside the moulds. I have a lot of pictures and explainations about this process on my web site: http://nx770cg.com/FuelSystem.html West Systems Epoxy is the type of resin you should use in a fuel tank, as it is impervious to fuels, oil, and solvents. I am VERY careful about not having alcohol in my fuel, and I use MoGas about half the time. There is a lot of corn out here in Kansas, and more and more of it is being used in the fuel. Another thing I would like to mention, is that a Nose Heavy Pietenpol is about as rare as a light weight Pietenpol driver. Have you ever done a Weight & Balance ? And then do it all over again, with a helper, just to confirm the first time ? Chuck G. NX770CG (hope you get to feeling better...flying weather ain't far off !! ) ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Source for tailwheel spring
From: "Don Emch" <EmchAir(at)aol.com>
Date: Jan 29, 2007
Hey guys, Just as another source. I got mine from the front forks of a motorcycle. At the time I didn't realize how easy it was to order from McMaster-Carr. I went to a local junkyard and they had a few motorcycles with bent front forks. They told me if they were bent to have at it and do what I wanted to them. The forks are a hydraulic cylinder with a spring inside. I took the cap off of both bent tubes from one bike and ended up with 2 springs almost 18" long. They charged me a whopping $2.00 for both. I cut it down and now have a few spares. It has been doing really well back there since I started flying. If you really want to know there is probably a story behind just about every part on my plane. And I'm sure all the other Piets are the same! Don Emch NX899DE Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=91443#91443 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rcaprd(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 29, 2007
Subject: Re: Tailwheel spring
In a message dated 1/29/2007 2:56:04 PM Central Standard Time, HelsperSew(at)aol.com writes: Mine will be a skid plate, with the option of attaching (with pins) a removable tailwheel. At this point it will be a non-steerable tailwheel. We shall see how it goes. Hopefully with good brakes, I won't need the steerable model. Dan, I tried that set up, and in '03 I flew 'er from Wichita to Brodhead / Oshkosh. Here is a re-print of one of the write ups I did about that flight: Subj: Pietenpol-List: Flying Stories - Tail skids & hard surface Date: 8/12/03 12:10:02 AM Central Daylight Time From: Rcaprd(at)aol.com I just gotta share some of my flying stories with y'all (most of them are true), as well as some of the lessons I've learned. Flying a 'Low & Slow' airplane cross country is absolutely the best way to see this beautiful country we live in, and meet so many people...it's a real attention getter at the FBO's. Don't tell me this ain't no cross country airplane, cause I don't wanna hear about it. On the return trip, someone asked "Well, how many hours did it take to get there ?" I replied "When you fly a Pietenpol on a cross country, you don't measure time in hours, you measure it in days !!" After a good heart felt laugh, they gathered themselves back together and asked "OK, well how many days did it take you to get there ?" I replied with a grin "Three !!" Tail Skids, and hard surface runways: I have always flown off the grass runways, no brakes, and the tail skid performs very well on the grass. Simplicity at it's finest, and much less weight back at the tail. Stick forward, add power, and just rudder it around...no worries. I got the brakes operational just a week before Brodhead, but didn't have time to get a tail wheel done. Well, when ya try to land a tail skid on a hard surface runway, ya really gotta spit your gum out, and pay attention !! My first one, was on the second leg of my trip. I did four hard surface landings during my adventure to Brodhead / Oshkosh adventure, and each time I almost lost it on roll out - maybe 20 or 15 mph down to zero mph. I learned that any slight breeze will push the tail around, and with the engine at idle - no prop wash, she just doesn't pay any attention to where the rudder is, and the tail just goes wherever the wind tells it to. When I left, I thought I could just use a touch of brake in this situation, and everything would be cool...Big Mistake...BIG BIG MISTAKE !! Example: When she's headed to the right side of the edge of the runway, I just lightly stabbed the left brake to keep it on course down the runway. Well, this got 'er pointed back on course, but it also brought the tail up abruptly, and then it did a double bounce back down. Adding power takes a second or two, for the prop wash to reach the rudder. On my second hard surface landing, I just let 'er go to the grass off the side of the runway...I think she was just letting me know she likes it there much more !! Each time, I had visions of either nosing over, or doing a ground loop. So...THAT'S why I was the only one there at Brodhead with a tail skid !! When I landed at Oshkosh in front of all those people, and as I was doing this dance down the runway, ATC was saying to me "Red high wing, exit runway...as soon as you can..." So... the morale of this story, is 'Entertainment is as close as my next landing'. Or...'Tail skids, and hard surface runways, just don't mix well'. Chuck Gantzer NX770CG Wichita, KS ________________________________________________________________________________
From: PIETLARS29(at)wmconnect.com
Date: Jan 29, 2007
Subject: Re: Fuel tanks
Hi, Made my tank out of 26 ga. galvanized iron; I think that 28 ga would do OK. We soldered the seams, not welded; make flanges at joints and rivet the pieces for mechanical joining then solder the seams. You need a large soldering iron, preferably using a gas burner to heat it. Lou Larsen ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fuel tanks
From: "Don Emch" <EmchAir(at)aol.com>
Date: Jan 29, 2007
Mine is .050" 5052 Al. It is very soft and workable. I formed it all up and used a filler neck and cap from Aircraft Spruce. I clamped it together and took it to a racecar builder who welds aluminum tanks and 4130 steel car frames. The guy is from Gibsonburg, OH (near Toledo) and does really great work. He has done several other airplane tanks and 4130 tubing engine mounts. If anyone is interested I could get the info. Don Emch NX899DE Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=91449#91449 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel tanks
Date: Jan 29, 2007
Chuck, No I haven't heard of a nose heavy Piet. That's the reason I'm looking for a heavy fuel tank. Need the weight up front. When I pulled the tank I found the builder had installed 16 lbs of lead to help put more weight forward Plus I'm taking off the metal prop and installing a wood prop (about a 12 lb loss). Guess I should have mentioned that my fuel tank sets right behind the firewall. The plane has been flying hands off but you had better believe I will be doing a new W & B after my changes. So far I'm not a builder but I would call my self a "redoer". I've rebuilt 5 different airplanes and I've been pleased with the results. I can't afford to build and fly at the same time and I hate to give up flying for very long. Rebuilding is much quicker and I still get some of the satisfaction of building, plus it's a great way to get to know your airplane. The plane should be down only about 2 to 3 months, mainly because of the engine major overhaul. I'll be flying by spring. I really appreciate all the good info and advice from this site. Gene in Tennessee ----- Original Message ----- From: Rcaprd(at)aol.com To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks In a message dated 1/29/2007 1:32:37 PM Central Standard Time, zharvey(at)bellsouth.net writes: Thanks for the reply Gordon. Fiberglass was considered as I've built and repaired fiberglass boats for a fair number of years. I discarded the idea for a number of reasons. I actually need more weight not less. I guess the biggest reason is the alcohol that is finding its way into almost all fuel. A real killer on fiberglass tanks. If you use only av gas it shouldn't be a problem for now, but I end up using a lot of auto gas. Thank you Gene in Tennessee (down with the flu) Gene, I built both my fuel tanks with fiberglass, however, I mistakenly used polyester resin (auto body stuff). Instead of the lost foam method, I built female moulds, and did the 4 ply layups inside the moulds. I have a lot of pictures and explainations about this process on my web site: http://nx770cg.com/FuelSystem.html West Systems Epoxy is the type of resin you should use in a fuel tank, as it is impervious to fuels, oil, and solvents. I am VERY careful about not having alcohol in my fuel, and I use MoGas about half the time. There is a lot of corn out here in Kansas, and more and more of it is being used in the fuel. Another thing I would like to mention, is that a Nose Heavy Pietenpol is about as rare as a light weight Pietenpol driver. Have you ever done a Weight & Balance ? And then do it all over again, with a helper, just to confirm the first time ? Chuck G. NX770CG (hope you get to feeling better...flying weather ain't far off !! ) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel tanks
Date: Jan 29, 2007
Lou, Good info. How long (flight hours) have you had your tank and how has it held up? Thank you Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: PIETLARS29(at)wmconnect.com To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 6:34 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks Hi, Made my tank out of 26 ga. galvanized iron; I think that 28 ga would do OK. We soldered the seams, not welded; make flanges at joints and rivet the pieces for mechanical joining then solder the seams. You need a large soldering iron, preferably using a gas burner to heat it. Lou Larsen ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "gcardinal" <gcardinal(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel tanks
Date: Jan 29, 2007
Tried this method on NX18235 and we were not happy. The tank was beautifully constructed and leak checked on the bench. It held fine for the first hour of flight time and then the tell-tale blue streaks of 100LL started showing up. After about 50 hours of flight time the galvanized, riveted and soldered tank was leaking at the rate of about 1 gallon per hour. Replaced it with a TIG welded aluminum tank. No more leaks and no more worries. Greg Cardinal ----- Original Message ----- Hi, Made my tank out of 26 ga. galvanized iron; I think that 28 ga would do OK. We soldered the seams, not welded; make flanges at joints and rivet the pieces for mechanical joining then solder the seams. You need a large soldering iron, preferably using a gas burner to heat it. Lou Larsen ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 29, 2007
From: KMHeide <kmheidecpo(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: A Corksickle Update
Today we finished securing the airplane and wings in place. Everything is tucked underneath with the tail section dissembled and stored in the back of the truck. As Corky filled up with gas, I made sure the trailer tires were properly inflated. Finally with map in one hand and the other waving goodbye, I heard him exclaim....Merry Christmas to all..... and to yous Yankees with 15 below kiss my cold southern @*#%+ ass! Tee-hee-hee Enjoy the trip corky and my god bless you always! Members...enjoy the photos. Ken H. Fargo, ND --------------------------------- Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast with theYahoo! Search weather shortcut. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel tanks
Date: Jan 30, 2007
Greg, Thanks for the heads up report on your galvanized fuel tank. Did you use 5052 Aluminum on your new tank? The reason I ask is that the aluminum tank installed in my Piet is stress cracking after only 50 hours. Have no idea what aluminum was used but I want to do it right when I replace it. Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: gcardinal To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 10:59 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks Tried this method on NX18235 and we were not happy. The tank was beautifully constructed and leak checked on the bench. It held fine for the first hour of flight time and then the tell-tale blue streaks of 100LL started showing up. After about 50 hours of flight time the galvanized, riveted and soldered tank was leaking at the rate of about 1 gallon per hour. Replaced it with a TIG welded aluminum tank. No more leaks and no more worries. Greg Cardinal ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HelsperSew(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 30, 2007
Subject: Re: Tailwheel spring
Chuck, Thanks for the archive report. Did you put the "keels" on your skid plate, and do you think these are necessary on grass? Dan Helsper Poplar Grove, IL. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Glass" <redsglass(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Fuel tanks and baffels
Date: Jan 30, 2007
With all the talk about fuel tank and some failures of the thinner tanks, has anybody installed any baffels in their tanks? I understand these are fairly small tanks but the baffels would structurally stiffen the tanks and slow down the fuel "banging" into one side or the other. What do you other guys think? Steve in Maine _________________________________________________________________ FREE online classifieds from Windows Live Expo buy and sell with people you know ________________________________________________________________________________
From: PIETLARS29(at)wmconnect.com
Date: Jan 30, 2007
Subject: Re: Fuel tanks
Gene, Flight time on my tank is zero; I'm about 90% complete and about 70% to go. My tank was built with an majority assist by a Chapter member who is retired from the sheet metal trade. he used to make ferry tanks for folks ferrying aircraft to South America from Miami, so he knows what he's doing. . We did pressure tests and leak tests until we had it tight. B. Pietenpol used terne plate for his tanks and a while back Larry Williams presented considerable detail on his G.I. tank fabrication; should be in the archives. Regards, Lou Larsen ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Source for tailwheel spring
Date: Jan 30, 2007
From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com>
I got mine at McMaster-Carr. http://www.mcmaster.com/ I forget what model number I used. Jack Phillips Getting ready to fly the Piet to Sun 'n' Fun -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of HelsperSew(at)aol.com Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 12:30 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Source for tailwheel spring Hi Pieters, Can anyone help with a source for the large coil tail wheel spring? Thanko mucho (that's Spanish for thank you very much). Dan Helsper Poplar Grove, IL. _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilege d, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it i n error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Fuel tanks
Date: Jan 30, 2007
From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com>
Gene, I made my tank out of 5052 aluminum, .040" thick, riveted together and then TIG welded Jack NX899JP -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Gene and Tammy Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 12:57 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks I'm checking into building a new fuel tank for my Piet. What grade of aluminum should I use? Has anyone used any other metal for their tanks? I could use extra weight up front so the weight is not a negative factor. I'm changing from a metal prop to a wood one, a loss of about 12 lbs Plus when I pulled my old tank I found 16 lbs of lead the builder had installed in front of the tank. I'm going to mount a battery and a tool box on the firewall and that will help some. Thanks Gene _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilege d, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it i n error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 30, 2007
From: Mike Luther <luther(at)gci.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel tanks
Gene, My vote for a fuel tank is .040 5052 H32 Aluminum. You can assemble it easy enough and have it Tig welded. Mike Luther ----- Original Message ----- From: Gene and Tammy <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net> Date: Monday, January 29, 2007 9:06 am Subject: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks > I'm checking into building a new fuel tank for my Piet. What > grade of aluminum should I use? Has anyone used any other metal > for their tanks? I could use extra weight up front so the weight > is not a negative factor. I'm changing from a metal prop to a wood > one, a loss of about 12 lbs Plus when I pulled my old tank I found > 16 lbs of lead the builder had installed in front of the tank. > I'm going to mount a battery and a tool box on the firewall and > that will help some. > Thanks > Gene ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Fuel tanks and baffels
Date: Jan 30, 2007
From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com>
My tank (centersection) has two baffles acting as ribs to stiffen the tank. About 80 hours on the plane now and no leaks. 15 gallon tank. Jack Phillips -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Steve Glass Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 7:53 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks and baffels With all the talk about fuel tank and some failures of the thinner tanks, has anybody installed any baffels in their tanks? I understand these are fairly small tanks but the baffels would structurally stiffen the tanks and slow down the fuel "banging" into one side or the other. What do you other guys think? Steve in Maine _________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "MICHAEL SILVIUS" <M.Silvius(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Source for tailwheel spring
Date: Jan 30, 2007
Try searching for Part # 9624 K6 at http://www.mcmaster.com/ that is the spring for the main landing gear in the Cub type set up with springs instead of bungees. that # will bring up the page with the springs and then you can go from there. michael ----- Original Message ----- From: Phillips, Jack I got mine at McMaster-Carr. http://www.mcmaster.com/ I forget what model number I used. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel tanks
Date: Jan 30, 2007
Thanks Mike. My local A & P is saying the same. I just want to explore all possibilities and find out what other Piet builders have done. Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: Mike Luther To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 10:45 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks Gene, My vote for a fuel tank is .040 5052 H32 Aluminum. You can assemble it easy enough and have it Tig welded. Mike Luther ----- Original Message ----- From: Gene and Tammy <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net> Date: Monday, January 29, 2007 9:06 am Subject: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > I'm checking into building a new fuel tank for my Piet. What > grade of aluminum should I use? Has anyone used any other metal > for their tanks? I could use extra weight up front so the weight > is not a negative factor. I'm changing from a metal prop to a wood > one, a loss of about 12 lbs Plus when I pulled my old tank I found > 16 lbs of lead the builder had installed in front of the tank. > I'm going to mount a battery and a tool box on the firewall and > that will help some. > Thanks > Gene ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel tanks
Date: Jan 30, 2007
Jack, Hate to make a pest out of myself but where have you found to be the best place to order your metal. Still haven't decided what I'm going to use but I need to place an order soon. How soon can I expect a report on that prop? Thanks Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: Phillips, Jack To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 10:20 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks Gene, I made my tank out of 5052 aluminum, .040" thick, riveted together and then TIG welded Jack NX899JP -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Gene and Tammy Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 12:57 PM To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks I'm checking into building a new fuel tank for my Piet. What grade of aluminum should I use? Has anyone used any other metal for their tanks? I could use extra weight up front so the weight is not a negative factor. I'm changing from a metal prop to a wood one, a loss of about 12 lbs Plus when I pulled my old tank I found 16 lbs of lead the builder had installed in front of the tank. I'm going to mount a battery and a tool box on the firewall and that will help some. Thanks Gene _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: A Corksickle Update
Date: Jan 30, 2007
Ken, Thanks for the report on Corky the wimp. Where can I find the photos? Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: KMHeide To: Pietenpol Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 1:04 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: A Corksickle Update Today we finished securing the airplane and wings in place. Everything is tucked underneath with the tail section dissembled and stored in the back of the truck. As Corky filled up with gas, I made sure the trailer tires were properly inflated. Finally with map in one hand and the other waving goodbye, I heard him exclaim....Merry Christmas to all..... and to yous Yankees with 15 below kiss my cold southern @*#%+ ass! Tee-hee-hee Enjoy the trip corky and my god bless you always! Members...enjoy the photos. Ken H. Fargo, ND ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast with theYahoo! Search weather shortcut. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Fuel tanks
Date: Jan 30, 2007
From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com>
I don't know the best place, but I just ordered most of my aluminum from AS&S. The prop report will probably be after SNF. Jack Phillips In San Diego on business, and enjoying the warmth (it was 22 F when I left NC yesterday) -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Gene and Tammy Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 12:48 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks Jack, Hate to make a pest out of myself but where have you found to be the best place to order your metal. Still haven't decided what I'm going to use but I need to place an order soon. How soon can I expect a report on that prop? Thanks Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: Phillips, Jack <mailto:Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com> To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 10:20 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks Gene, I made my tank out of 5052 aluminum, .040" thick, riveted together and then TIG welded Jack NX899JP -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Gene and Tammy Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 12:57 PM To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks I'm checking into building a new fuel tank for my Piet. What grade of aluminum should I use? Has anyone used any other metal for their tanks? I could use extra weight up front so the weight is not a negative factor. I'm changing from a metal prop to a wood one, a loss of about 12 lbs Plus when I pulled my old tank I found 16 lbs of lead the builder had installed in front of the tank. I'm going to mount a battery and a tool box on the firewall and that will help some. Thanks Gene _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.matr onics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilege d, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it i n error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: 17 gallon nose tank, no baffles
Date: Jan 30, 2007
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
My behind the firewall tank is just like Jack's being 5052 .040" and TIG welded. I have the tank well supported so it doesn't oil can on me that I can tell and no leaks after 300 plus hours. Used Fuel Lube on the screw-in fittings. Small can will last you two or three lifetimes and to share with other homebuilders. I liken it to cold bees wax...very stiff and sticky but better than using teflon tape (which is verboten in fuel systems...see Bingelis books) or other goop. Mike C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: 17 gallon nose tank, no baffles
Date: Jan 30, 2007
Mike The tank I removed from my Piet is almost an exact copy of your drawing! The only difference I noticed is the stainless strap. I'm not sure of the thickness of the tank. I've even considered just plateing over the tank. I'm going to take the tank to someone knowledgable to see what they say. In the end, it'll be me that makes the decision on what to do and it will be me flying with it. Everyones input has been really helpful. I'm learning a lot Thanks for the heads up on the Fuel Lube and yes, teflon tape is a good thing to keep away from fuel or oil. All it takes is one little ol' piece to shut you down in a big way (been there/done that with a P/U truck engine). Thanks Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 1:00 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: 17 gallon nose tank, no baffles My behind the firewall tank is just like Jack's being 5052 .040" and TIG welded. I have the tank well supported so it doesn't oil can on me that I can tell and no leaks after 300 plus hours. Used Fuel Lube on the screw-in fittings. Small can will last you two or three lifetimes and to share with other homebuilders. I liken it to cold bees wax...very stiff and sticky but better than using teflon tape (which is verboten in fuel systems...see Bingelis books) or other goop. Mike C. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 30, 2007
From: "walt evans" <waltdak(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: 17 gallon nose tank, no baffles
Mine looks very similar to yours mike, except 14 gallons. Made mine to sit on the original "A" shelf. No baffles The pics are of the tank BEFORE having it rewelded by my welder/builder friend. After I welded it I used it to water the flowers in the garden, then had it rewelded. :^) walt evans NX140DL "Put your wealth in knowledge, and no one can ever take it from you" Ben Franklin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:00 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: 17 gallon nose tank, no baffles My behind the firewall tank is just like Jack's being 5052 .040" and TIG welded. I have the tank well supported so it doesn't oil can on me that I can tell and no leaks after 300 plus hours. Used Fuel Lube on the screw-in fittings. Small can will last you two or three lifetimes and to share with other homebuilders. I liken it to cold bees wax...very stiff and sticky but better than using teflon tape (which is verboten in fuel systems...see Bingelis books) or other goop. Mike C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "gbowen(at)ptialaska.net" <gbowen(at)ptialaska.net>
Date: Jan 30, 2007
Subject: Fuel tanks
Jack, Haven't seen a problem yet, but don't spend much time at that speed due to my ears fluttering in the wind. My buddy has a Champ and with the tight cowling he has he timed us as I tried to catch up for pictures, C-85 on the Champ Gordon Original Message: ----------------- From: Jack T. Textor jtextor(at)thepalmergroup.com Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:10:31 -0600 Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks Gordon, At 105 indicated, do you have a concern with control fluter? Jack www.textors.com -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "gbowen(at)ptialaska.net" <gbowen(at)ptialaska.net>
Date: Jan 30, 2007
Subject: Re: Fuel tanks
Gene, The issue of alcohol in fuel has been batted around the canardian group a lot. Concensus is use AVgas, unless forced to use a tank or two of Mogas with alcohol. Epoxy is pretty resistant to alcohol and most other solvents, I suspect the aromatics they put in no-lead fuel is more damaging to epoxy tanks than the issue of alcohol. I run only Avgas. Gordon Original Message: ----------------- From: Gene and Tammy zharvey(at)bellsouth.net Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:02:33 -0600 Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks Gordon, Very interested in your galvanized steel tank. What thickness did you use? How hard was it to work with? I plan on forming my own and then having it welded by someone that knows what their doing. Sounds like you get great performance out of your plane. I'm in the middle of completely going thru my Piet and doing a major on the A-65. I'm not completely happy with the current fuel tank and using a heavier metel would allow me to do away with the lead. As far as fiberglass using polyester resin or epoxy I encourage anyone considering building a fuel tank from fiberglass to check around and do a little investigating pior to building. Boat US is a good source of information on fiberglass fuel tanks as well as many of the homebuilt sites (Avid, Kit Fox ect) that use fiberglass tanks. Fuel with alcohol is a big problem for fiberglass tanks everyone should be awear of.. Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: <gbowen(at)ptialaska.net> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 4:35 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks > > > Gene, > Fiberglass made using polyester resin is a problem with all sorts of > solvents, including normal fuel. But fiberglass tanks made with epoxy > have > been in service with the canard-pusher guys since Rutan first flew into > Osh > in the early 70's. If they're done right, they don't leak. But if weight > is the consideration, make them out of galvanized steel like my Piete. If > fixed my weight problem (I'm 275lbs) with a 0-235 engine, chevy starter, > car battery under legs of passenger seat and moved the engine mount > forward > about 4". With Aeronca wings get about 750'/min. climb, with full 22 gal > fuel, my fat carcass, and indicates 105 mph at 3000' with full 2650 rpm > power. But love to cruise at 2000 rpm at 75mph indicated, hang the elbow > out the side like driving a convertable, fuel burn is about 6 gal/hr > Fresh > jugs on Lyco gets about 108 hp. > Gordon > > Original Message: > ----------------- > From: Gene and Tammy zharvey(at)bellsouth.net > Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:30:11 -0600 > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks > > > > > Thanks for the reply Gordon. > Fiberglass was considered as I've built and repaired fiberglass boats for > a > fair number of years. I discarded the idea for a number of reasons. I > actually need more weight not less. I guess the biggest reason is the > alcohol that is finding its way into almost all fuel. A real killer on > fiberglass tanks. If you use only av gas it shouldn't be a problem for > now, > but I end up using a lot of auto gas. > Thank you > Gene in Tennessee (down with the flu) > >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> mail2web.com - Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on >> Microsoft >> Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft Windows and Linux web and application > hosting - http://link.mail2web.com/myhosting > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft Windows and Linux web and application hosting - http://link.mail2web.com/myhosting ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 30, 2007
From: "walt evans" <waltdak(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Prop refinishing/out of the blue
Just happened to remember when I was looking at some old pics of my building..... I had gotten an old Sensinich and refinished it. I contacted them and they sent me new decals for free. You may be able to get them right off the net. Just a little something. walt evans NX140DL "Put your wealth in knowledge, and no one can ever take it from you" Ben Franklin ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene and Tammy" <zharvey(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel tanks
Date: Jan 30, 2007
Gordon, Your right that as long as you use Avgas, fiberglass tanks are safe. I'm one of those that simply wants to be able to make the choice without fear of putting my self or my plane in danger. The last plane I owned (Avid) had fiberglass tanks and I didn't have one single problem. I always tested every tank of gas for alcohol. Others with the same plane, same fiberglass tanks, that did not test their gas, were having bad problems and some planes may have been lost because of it. Lots of problems with fiberglass and alcohol are well documented. I'm not trying to scare anyone or badmouth fiberglass, just want others to be informed. Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: <gbowen(at)ptialaska.net> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:45 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks > > > Gene, > The issue of alcohol in fuel has been batted around the canardian group a > lot. Concensus is use AVgas, unless forced to use a tank or two of Mogas > with alcohol. Epoxy is pretty resistant to alcohol and most other > solvents, I suspect the aromatics they put in no-lead fuel is more > damaging > to epoxy tanks than the issue of alcohol. I run only Avgas. > Gordon > > Original Message: > ----------------- > From: Gene and Tammy zharvey(at)bellsouth.net > Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:02:33 -0600 > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks > > > > > Gordon, > Very interested in your galvanized steel tank. What thickness did you > use? > How hard was it to work with? I plan on forming my own and then having it > welded by someone that knows what their doing. Sounds like you get great > performance out of your plane. > I'm in the middle of completely going thru my Piet and doing a major on > the > A-65. I'm not completely happy with the current fuel tank and using a > heavier metel would allow me to do away with the lead. > As far as fiberglass using polyester resin or epoxy I encourage anyone > considering building a fuel tank from fiberglass to check around and do a > little investigating pior to building. Boat US is a good source of > information on fiberglass fuel tanks as well as many of the homebuilt > sites > (Avid, Kit Fox ect) that use fiberglass tanks. Fuel with alcohol is a big > problem for fiberglass tanks everyone should be awear of.. > Gene > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <gbowen(at)ptialaska.net> > To: > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 4:35 PM > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks > > >> >> >> Gene, >> Fiberglass made using polyester resin is a problem with all sorts of >> solvents, including normal fuel. But fiberglass tanks made with epoxy >> have >> been in service with the canard-pusher guys since Rutan first flew into >> Osh >> in the early 70's. If they're done right, they don't leak. But if >> weight >> is the consideration, make them out of galvanized steel like my Piete. >> If >> fixed my weight problem (I'm 275lbs) with a 0-235 engine, chevy starter, >> car battery under legs of passenger seat and moved the engine mount >> forward >> about 4". With Aeronca wings get about 750'/min. climb, with full 22 gal >> fuel, my fat carcass, and indicates 105 mph at 3000' with full 2650 rpm >> power. But love to cruise at 2000 rpm at 75mph indicated, hang the elbow >> out the side like driving a convertable, fuel burn is about 6 gal/hr >> Fresh >> jugs on Lyco gets about 108 hp. >> Gordon >> >> Original Message: >> ----------------- >> From: Gene and Tammy zharvey(at)bellsouth.net >> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:30:11 -0600 >> To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks >> >> >> >> >> Thanks for the reply Gordon. >> Fiberglass was considered as I've built and repaired fiberglass boats for >> a >> fair number of years. I discarded the idea for a number of reasons. I >> actually need more weight not less. I guess the biggest reason is the >> alcohol that is finding its way into almost all fuel. A real killer on >> fiberglass tanks. If you use only av gas it shouldn't be a problem for >> now, >> but I end up using a lot of auto gas. >> Thank you >> Gene in Tennessee (down with the flu) >> >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> mail2web.com - Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on >>> Microsoft >>> Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft Windows and Linux web and application >> hosting - http://link.mail2web.com/myhosting >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft Windows and Linux web and application > hosting - http://link.mail2web.com/myhosting > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rcaprd(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 30, 2007
Subject: Re: Tailwheel spring & Skid
In a message dated 1/30/2007 6:09:59 AM Central Standard Time, HelsperSew(at)aol.com writes: Did you put the "keels" on your skid plate, and do you think these are necessary on grass? Nope, no keels on the bottom of the skid plate...just a flat plate. At Brodhead '03, I had to weld another plate on the skid, because it was worn through. I can't think of the guy's name, but he has the shop behind the fuel pumps there, and he found me a piece of metal, and let me use his torches. No place in the world like Brodhead !! I bought him a six pack of his favorite beer. I had to taxi across some asphalt at my home field, and I'm sure it would have left marks on the asphalt on a hot summer day. I don't think the keel is really necessary. It handled well on the grass. Get it on the pavement though, with any cross wind, and it's very difficult to control, unless you are going very slow, and you have differential brakes. Land on hard surface with a tail skid, and you are completely at the mercy of a cross wind. I've never taken out any runway lights, but she did veer off the runway twice, and there were a few other close calls on hard surface landings. Landing full stall on the grass was a no-brainer, and she tracked straight on roll out, and the rudder was effective. I now have a 3 1/2" steerable tailwheel, but it should have been a 4". I've got to use some brakes to steer in tall grass. The 1/16" tailwheel cables run all the way up to the inboard portion of the rudder bar. I can go anywhere now, with confidence. I used the original tail skid, and added the wheel to the aft portion, to keep the tail as low as possible. I've got to touch the tail wheel before the mains, to get a full stall landing now, or she'll bounce a little because the wing is not done flying yet. If I ever put a 4" wheel back there, it would be even more challenging to get a full stall landing. Chuck G. NX770CG ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "gbowen(at)ptialaska.net" <gbowen(at)ptialaska.net>
Date: Jan 30, 2007
Subject: Re: Fuel tanks
The Canardian group I'm a member has about 1000 members via Yahoo, several are engineers in the fuel industry. Since all the Rutanesque type planes have all composite tanks, this problem of Mogas has been beat around a heck of alot. Biggest issue is the variable nature of Mogas, diff formula for different times of year and different regions of the country. Issue of increased amounts of alcohol in Mogas has been of great concern lately. Most problems have come from the additives to gas eating the various gaskets in the entire fuel system. I spent most of my career in the epoxy industry, so can be pretty sure the least of the problems with composite tanks is the epoxy. Derakane, epoxie's chemical cousin is used for underground fuel storage tanks at the local gas station. Gordon Original Message: ----------------- From: Gene and Tammy zharvey(at)bellsouth.net Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:31:36 -0600 Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks Gordon, Your right that as long as you use Avgas, fiberglass tanks are safe. I'm one of those that simply wants to be able to make the choice without fear of putting my self or my plane in danger. The last plane I owned (Avid) had fiberglass tanks and I didn't have one single problem. I always tested every tank of gas for alcohol. Others with the same plane, same fiberglass tanks, that did not test their gas, were having bad problems and some planes may have been lost because of it. Lots of problems with fiberglass and alcohol are well documented. I'm not trying to scare anyone or badmouth fiberglass, just want others to be informed. Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: <gbowen(at)ptialaska.net> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:45 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks > > > Gene, > The issue of alcohol in fuel has been batted around the canardian group a > lot. Concensus is use AVgas, unless forced to use a tank or two of Mogas > with alcohol. Epoxy is pretty resistant to alcohol and most other > solvents, I suspect the aromatics they put in no-lead fuel is more > damaging > to epoxy tanks than the issue of alcohol. I run only Avgas. > Gordon > > Original Message: > ----------------- > From: Gene and Tammy zharvey(at)bellsouth.net > Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:02:33 -0600 > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks > > > > > Gordon, > Very interested in your galvanized steel tank. What thickness did you > use? > How hard was it to work with? I plan on forming my own and then having it > welded by someone that knows what their doing. Sounds like you get great > performance out of your plane. > I'm in the middle of completely going thru my Piet and doing a major on > the > A-65. I'm not completely happy with the current fuel tank and using a > heavier metel would allow me to do away with the lead. > As far as fiberglass using polyester resin or epoxy I encourage anyone > considering building a fuel tank from fiberglass to check around and do a > little investigating pior to building. Boat US is a good source of > information on fiberglass fuel tanks as well as many of the homebuilt > sites > (Avid, Kit Fox ect) that use fiberglass tanks. Fuel with alcohol is a big > problem for fiberglass tanks everyone should be awear of.. > Gene > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <gbowen(at)ptialaska.net> > To: > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 4:35 PM > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks > > >> >> >> Gene, >> Fiberglass made using polyester resin is a problem with all sorts of >> solvents, including normal fuel. But fiberglass tanks made with epoxy >> have >> been in service with the canard-pusher guys since Rutan first flew into >> Osh >> in the early 70's. If they're done right, they don't leak. But if >> weight >> is the consideration, make them out of galvanized steel like my Piete. >> If >> fixed my weight problem (I'm 275lbs) with a 0-235 engine, chevy starter, >> car battery under legs of passenger seat and moved the engine mount >> forward >> about 4". With Aeronca wings get about 750'/min. climb, with full 22 gal >> fuel, my fat carcass, and indicates 105 mph at 3000' with full 2650 rpm >> power. But love to cruise at 2000 rpm at 75mph indicated, hang the elbow >> out the side like driving a convertable, fuel burn is about 6 gal/hr >> Fresh >> jugs on Lyco gets about 108 hp. >> Gordon >> >> Original Message: >> ----------------- >> From: Gene and Tammy zharvey(at)bellsouth.net >> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:30:11 -0600 >> To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Fuel tanks >> >> >> >> >> Thanks for the reply Gordon. >> Fiberglass was considered as I've built and repaired fiberglass boats for >> a >> fair number of years. I discarded the idea for a number of reasons. I >> actually need more weight not less. I guess the biggest reason is the >> alcohol that is finding its way into almost all fuel. A real killer on >> fiberglass tanks. If you use only av gas it shouldn't be a problem for >> now, >> but I end up using a lot of auto gas. >> Thank you >> Gene in Tennessee (down with the flu) >> >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> mail2web.com - Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on >>> Microsoft >>> Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft Windows and Linux web and application >> hosting - http://link.mail2web.com/myhosting >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft Windows and Linux web and application > hosting - http://link.mail2web.com/myhosting > > >


January 11, 2007 - January 30, 2007

Pietenpol-Archive.digest.vol-fp