Pietenpol-Archive.digest.vol-lm

October 05, 2012 - October 26, 2012



Subject: pilot in command, Gary Boothe
Date: Oct 05, 2012
Dan =93 I never did =9Cre-pitch.=9D I only removed extra meat, and made sure I accurately maintained the pitch I had planned. The results were dramatic! Since I wasn=99t flying at the time, I can only report what the pilot reported, which was an increase of 10-15 mph, and a dramatic cooling effect! With full power (over 3,000rpm), I can easily increase speed to 85, but at a comfortable 2700rpm I appear to be cruising at about 72. Yesterday, at about 80 F, with two people and 16 gallons of fuel, we were climbing at about 400 fpm. By myself, (just one take off) climb was at about 700 fpm. I was a little distracted, though, as my borrowed head set started to blow off; so, while removing it, it also snagged my bi-focaled safety glasses, so there I was with no hearing protection, no eye protection, and no corrective lenses! Being a =9Csteely-eyed missile man=9D though, as John Hoffman put it, the absence of these creature comforts did little to affect the outcome [yawn]. Gary Boothe NX308MB
From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com
[mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of helspersew(at)aol.com Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 5:41 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: pilot in command, Gary Boothe Gary, Supreme congratulations!! You da Man! Please say how the prop re-pitch worked out. Dan Helsper Poplar Grove IL (till Sunday) -----Original Message----- From: Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC] (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC] Sent: Fri, Oct 5, 2012 7:36 am Subject: Pietenpol-List: pilot in command, Gary Boothe Would the owner/operator of NX308MB please step forward to accept this award Here=99s a huge round of applause for achieving the ultimate dream of every homebuilder Gary: flying your hand-built creation for the very first time. Way to go bro. Mike C. " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: pilot in command, Gary Boothe
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Oct 05, 2012
Congratulations Gary, I finally got logged in again. It is great to hear about your great successes. Keep it up buddy. -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384693#384693 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Douwe Blumberg" <douweblumberg(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Congrats Gary!
Date: Oct 05, 2012
Way to go Gary!! ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Pietenpol Pilot - Now I are one!
From: Robert Bush <rbush96589(at)aol.com>
Date: Oct 05, 2012
Way to go Gary, happy for you! Randy Bush NX294RB Sent from my iPhone On Oct 4, 2012, at 10:52 PM, "Gary Boothe" wrote: > > Following are some musings about the Phase 1 flight testing for NX308MB > > Having not logged any time since 1984, I made the decision to turn over Ph ase 1 testing to CFI/Test Pilot, Roy Richardson. I found that, when the time came, that brash confidence which dominated my flying in my youth had been r eplaced with a calmer patience. It had never been my intent to let someone e lse have the pleasure of the first flight, but I couldn=99t ignore the good fortune of finding the right person at the right time. Certainly it wo uld have been far less expensive to merely get current, then do my own test f lights, and having over 200 hrs of tail wheel time I wasn=99t concerne d about take offs and landings, but, for once in my life, I couldn=99t quiet that little voice, and Safety took the lead. > > Previously, I have explained my feelings of relief during the first few fl ights, watching from a distance. Eventually, I became accustomed to my role a s =98Crew Chief=99, tweaking, adjusting and repairing every big a nd little complaint that the pilot reported. As all of you who have built yo ur own planes can testify, there is no trepidation about making repairs; and , if you have also built your own engines, you have confidence there, too. T o me, this became the final chapter of the building processwithout a ny of the stress of those early flights. > > Roy addressed Phase 1 professionally, and quickly; flying the required 40 h ours in less than a month. He carried with him the =98Owner=99s M anual=99 that I had copied from someone else, making notations and cha nges where needed. We had long conversations about his discoveries (this was the first Pietenpol he had seen!), and how much he enjoyed how it flies. Ea ger to get the opportunity to fly myself, I was glad that he devoted so much time to it, and found the extra waiting time to be helpful in understanding what to expect. > > Flying with a CFI has never been relaxing or fun, but that flight, tonight , for me was still exciting and rewarding. The evening started with me stopp ing by the hangar to complete some maintenance, when Roy showed up. We start ed talking, and, wellyou knowone thing led to another and p retty soon we up in the air, with me in the rear cockpit!! The BFR checkride went without issue and, before long, I was up by myself! I doubt if I am ca pable of describing those feelings, or at least doing justice to the whole e vent (those who have been there will understand), but I can say that I think it was especially sweet knowing that I did not need to be concerned about t he mechanics or design of my plane, and needed only to concentrate on my fly ing. > > Definetly, I am not saying that I recommend this process to anyone, only t hat it worked for me. It=99s quite possible that I could have done my o wn first flight and subsequent Phase 1 flying, and had no lasting bad experi ences; but I do know that there were a number of minor issues that were imme diately apparent upon that first lift off, and a rusty old pilot would have b een busy. > > I wish all of you Pietenpol builders the pleasure I have experienced in th e building process, and the pleasure of your eventual first flight! > > Gary Boothe > NX308MB > > > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 05, 2012
From: Michael Perez <speedbrake(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Pietenpol Pilot - Now I are one!
Nice to hear Gary! Sounds like the plane is dialed in and ready for you to be pilot in command. Michael Perez Pietenpol HINT Videos Karetaker Aero www.karetakeraero.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 05, 2012
From: Jim Boyer <boyerjrb(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Pietenpol Pilot - Now I are one!
Wow! Congratulations Gary!!! I think you took the phase 1 40 hours exactly like my former employer; Boeing Airplane Co., would have a new model aircraft. I can still remember my first solo flight vividly and that was 59 years ago. Again congratulations and can't wait to see that beautiful Piet in person. Jim B. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 05, 2012
From: Jim Boyer <boyerjrb(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: pilot in command, Gary Boothe
Hi Again Gary, Sounds like your Piet performs very well with your prop. Your climb solo and with two is good. I don't remember my dad's old Aeronca Champ doing that well. About the Corvair numbers; you are climbing out at 3000 rpm? Cruising at 2700 rpm at ~72mph. What static rpm are you getting now that you refined your prop? Cheers, Jim B. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 05, 2012
From: Jim Boyer <boyerjrb(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Rib milestone
Curt I wish my eyes were that good! Cheers, Jim B. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Pietenpol Pilot - Now I are one!
From: Ray Krause <raykrause(at)frontiernet.net>
Date: Oct 05, 2012
Great job, Gary! I will stop in the first weekend that is available. I am anxious to see you r beautiful plane! Congratulations. Ray Krause Sent from my iPad On Oct 4, 2012, at 8:52 PM, "Gary Boothe" wrote: > > Following are some musings about the Phase 1 flight testing for NX308MB > > Having not logged any time since 1984, I made the decision to turn over Ph ase 1 testing to CFI/Test Pilot, Roy Richardson. I found that, when the time came, that brash confidence which dominated my flying in my youth had been r eplaced with a calmer patience. It had never been my intent to let someone e lse have the pleasure of the first flight, but I couldn=99t ignore the good fortune of finding the right person at the right time. Certainly it wo uld have been far less expensive to merely get current, then do my own test f lights, and having over 200 hrs of tail wheel time I wasn=99t concerne d about take offs and landings, but, for once in my life, I couldn=99t quiet that little voice, and Safety took the lead. > > Previously, I have explained my feelings of relief during the first few fl ights, watching from a distance. Eventually, I became accustomed to my role a s =98Crew Chief=99, tweaking, adjusting and repairing every big a nd little complaint that the pilot reported. As all of you who have built yo ur own planes can testify, there is no trepidation about making repairs; and , if you have also built your own engines, you have confidence there, too. T o me, this became the final chapter of the building processwithout a ny of the stress of those early flights. > > Roy addressed Phase 1 professionally, and quickly; flying the required 40 h ours in less than a month. He carried with him the =98Owner=99s M anual=99 that I had copied from someone else, making notations and cha nges where needed. We had long conversations about his discoveries (this was the first Pietenpol he had seen!), and how much he enjoyed how it flies. Ea ger to get the opportunity to fly myself, I was glad that he devoted so much time to it, and found the extra waiting time to be helpful in understanding what to expect. > > Flying with a CFI has never been relaxing or fun, but that flight, tonight , for me was still exciting and rewarding. The evening started with me stopp ing by the hangar to complete some maintenance, when Roy showed up. We start ed talking, and, wellyou knowone thing led to another and p retty soon we up in the air, with me in the rear cockpit!! The BFR checkride went without issue and, before long, I was up by myself! I doubt if I am ca pable of describing those feelings, or at least doing justice to the whole e vent (those who have been there will understand), but I can say that I think it was especially sweet knowing that I did not need to be concerned about t he mechanics or design of my plane, and needed only to concentrate on my fly ing. > > Definetly, I am not saying that I recommend this process to anyone, only t hat it worked for me. It=99s quite possible that I could have done my o wn first flight and subsequent Phase 1 flying, and had no lasting bad experi ences; but I do know that there were a number of minor issues that were imme diately apparent upon that first lift off, and a rusty old pilot would have b een busy. > > I wish all of you Pietenpol builders the pleasure I have experienced in th e building process, and the pleasure of your eventual first flight! > > Gary Boothe > NX308MB > > > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Pietenpol Pilot - Now I are one!
From: "K5YAC" <hangar10(at)cox.net>
Date: Oct 05, 2012
Way to go Gary! -------- Mark Chouinard Wings, Center Section and Empannage and Fuse framed up - Working on Landing Gear Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384707#384707 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5(at)comcast.net>
Subject: pilot in command, Gary Boothe
Date: Oct 05, 2012
Yes, 3000-3100 on climb out. At 2700, cruise appears to be about 72mph. Since re-conditioning my prop, I have not done a static run-up. My brakes are still ineffective, but I have new brake linings to install, as suggested by Dan Helsper. Gary Boothe NX308MB From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jim Boyer Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 7:43 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: pilot in command, Gary Boothe Hi Again Gary, Sounds like your Piet performs very well with your prop. Your climb solo and with two is good. I don't remember my dad's old Aeronca Champ doing that well. About the Corvair numbers; you are climbing out at 3000 rpm? Cruising at 2700 rpm at ~72mph. What static rpm are you getting now that you refined your prop? Cheers, Jim B. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Pietenpol Pilot - Now I are one!
From: "caldwrl" <caldwrl(at)etex.net>
Date: Oct 05, 2012
Gary... great job! I can only imagine the feeling at this time, but your example will lead me on. I look forward to flying in the same sky with you... someday soon, I hope. -------- Robert Caldwell Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384712#384712 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Ray Krause
Date: Oct 05, 2012
Ray =93 The email address I have for you does not appear to be functioning. Please send me a private note so that I can correct it. Thanks, Gary From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ray Krause Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 7:52 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Pietenpol Pilot - Now I are one! Great job, Gary! I will stop in the first weekend that is available. I am anxious to see your beautiful plane! Congratulations. Ray Krause Sent from my iPad On Oct 4, 2012, at 8:52 PM, "Gary Boothe" wrote: Following are some musings about the Phase 1 flight testing for NX308MB Having not logged any time since 1984, I made the decision to turn over Phase 1 testing to CFI/Test Pilot, Roy Richardson. I found that, when the time came, that brash confidence which dominated my flying in my youth had been replaced with a calmer patience. It had never been my intent to let someone else have the pleasure of the first flight, but I couldn=99t ignore the good fortune of finding the right person at the right time. Certainly it would have been far less expensive to merely get current, then do my own test flights, and having over 200 hrs of tail wheel time I wasn=99t concerned about take offs and landings, but, for once in my life, I couldn=99t quiet that little voice, and Safety took the lead. Previously, I have explained my feelings of relief during the first few flights, watching from a distance. Eventually, I became accustomed to my role as =98Crew Chief=99, tweaking, adjusting and repairing every big and little complaint that the pilot reported. As all of you who have built your own planes can testify, there is no trepidation about making repairs; and, if you have also built your own engines, you have confidence there, too. To me, this became the final chapter of the building processwithout any of the stress of those early flights. Roy addressed Phase 1 professionally, and quickly; flying the required 40 hours in less than a month. He carried with him the =98Owner=99s Manual=99 that I had copied from someone else, making notations and changes where needed. We had long conversations about his discoveries (this was the first Pietenpol he had seen!), and how much he enjoyed how it flies. Eager to get the opportunity to fly myself, I was glad that he devoted so much time to it, and found the extra waiting time to be helpful in understanding what to expect. Flying with a CFI has never been relaxing or fun, but that flight, tonight, for me was still exciting and rewarding. The evening started with me stopping by the hangar to complete some maintenance, when Roy showed up. We started talking, and, wellyou knowone thing led to another and pretty soon we up in the air, with me in the rear cockpit!! The BFR checkride went without issue and, before long, I was up by myself! I doubt if I am capable of describing those feelings, or at least doing justice to the whole event (those who have been there will understand), but I can say that I think it was especially sweet knowing that I did not need to be concerned about the mechanics or design of my plane, and needed only to concentrate on my flying. Definetly, I am not saying that I recommend this process to anyone, only that it worked for me. It=99s quite possible that I could have done my own first flight and subsequent Phase 1 flying, and had no lasting bad experiences; but I do know that there were a number of minor issues that were immediately apparent upon that first lift off, and a rusty old pilot would have been busy. I wish all of you Pietenpol builders the pleasure I have experienced in the building process, and the pleasure of your eventual first flight! Gary Boothe NX308MB ========= >http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List ========= cs.com ========= matronics.com/contribution ========= ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5(at)comcast.net>
Subject: pilot in command, Gary Boothe
Date: Oct 05, 2012
[bowing..humbly] Gary Boothe NX308MB From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 5:36 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: pilot in command, Gary Boothe Would the owner/operator of NX308MB please step forward to accept this award.. Here's a huge round of applause for achieving the ultimate dream of every homebuilder Gary: flying your hand-built creation for the very first time. Way to go bro. Mike C. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: pilot in command, Gary Boothe
From: "Don Emch" <EmchAir(at)aol.com>
Date: Oct 05, 2012
Gary, That is awesome news! Congratulations! Being up there by yourself for the first time is an amazing experience. It's like the thing is finally alive. There really is no way to fully describe it! Good luck and be careful!! Don Emch NX899DE Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384719#384719 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5(at)comcast.net>
Subject: From my CFI
Date: Oct 05, 2012
List, Below, kind words, no doubt, from my instructor/test pilot. I forward this, not for the commentary on my own plane because I have been to Brodhead and have seen true, lasting craftsmanship, but because I think it speaks to the Pietenpol community as a whole. Roy has done a fair amount of background reading on Pietenpols, but he really has no inkling about all of you, and how this could be directed to anyone of you. He has accomplishments which include CFI, ATP, Rotorcraft and is rumored to have over 15,000 hrs! Pilots at my airport hale him as "the best stick & rudder instructor" they know (of course, they don't know you CFI's in Pietenpol Land). His opinion of the airplanes we build and fly is gratifying. Funny story: Yesterday, while re-fueling, as usual, I collected some gawkers. One was a nice old guy who had just flown in in a RV-whatever. He said, "It's been a long time since I have seen a Pietenpol, and that's a damn nice-looking one!" "It oughta be.it's fresh off the factory floor." "No kidding? I didn't know they were back in business!" Gary Boothe NX308MB From: Roy Richardson [mailto:royc_richardson(at)hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 8:44 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol Pilot - Now I are one! Thanks Gary! Rarely in a pilot's career does one get the opportunity to meet and fly with a true craftsman....the whole experience with you and the Piet has been a real highlight in my career. In one short month, I got to fly a plane that took me back to how flying must have been in the 20's and 30's...no radios, cold, loud, windy, incredible. Knowing that the airplane was professionally built and by someone who paid attention to detail; who listened to my concerns and complaints and fixed them immediately...no matter how small. In my opinion, your plan and your execution was perfect! Watching you leave with the Pietenpol was as, if not more, exciting as soloing a student for the first time. You have an amazing gift that you can now completely share with others. You can now see things the way few people on this Earth can. Enjoy every minute of time with your amazing airplane! Thanks again for allowing me to be a part of this great experience! Roy _____ From: gboothe5(at)comcast.net Subject: FW: Pietenpol Pilot - Now I are one! Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 21:35:39 -0700 Thanks, again, Roy!! Hope your pictures turned out better than mine! Following is my post to my fellow Pietenpolers. Gary From: Gary Boothe [mailto:gboothe5(at)comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 8:53 PM Subject: Pietenpol Pilot - Now I are one! Following are some musings about the Phase 1 flight testing for NX308MB. Having not logged any time since 1984, I made the decision to turn over Phase 1 testing to CFI/Test Pilot, Roy Richardson. I found that, when the time came, that brash confidence which dominated my flying in my youth had been replaced with a calmer patience. It had never been my intent to let someone else have the pleasure of the first flight, but I couldn't ignore the good fortune of finding the right person at the right time. Certainly it would have been far less expensive to merely get current, then do my own test flights, and having over 200 hrs of tail wheel time I wasn't concerned about take offs and landings, but, for once in my life, I couldn't quiet that little voice, and Safety took the lead. Previously, I have explained my feelings of relief during the first few flights, watching from a distance. Eventually, I became accustomed to my role as 'Crew Chief', tweaking, adjusting and repairing every big and little complaint that the pilot reported. As all of you who have built your own planes can testify, there is no trepidation about making repairs; and, if you have also built your own engines, you have confidence there, too. To me, this became the final chapter of the building process.without any of the stress of those early flights. Roy addressed Phase 1 professionally, and quickly; flying the required 40 hours in less than a month. He carried with him the 'Owner's Manual' that I had copied from someone else, making notations and changes where needed. We had long conversations about his discoveries (this was the first Pietenpol he had seen!), and how much he enjoyed how it flies. Eager to get the opportunity to fly myself, I was glad that he devoted so much time to it, and found the extra waiting time to be helpful in understanding what to expect. Flying with a CFI has never been relaxing or fun, but that flight, tonight, for me was still exciting and rewarding. The evening started with me stopping by the hangar to complete some maintenance, when Roy showed up. We started talking, and, well.you know.one thing led to another and pretty soon we up in the air, with me in the rear cockpit!! The BFR checkride went without issue and, before long, I was up by myself! I doubt if I am capable of describing those feelings, or at least doing justice to the whole event (those who have been there will understand), but I can say that I think it was especially sweet knowing that I did not need to be concerned about the mechanics or design of my plane, and needed only to concentrate on my flying. Definetly, I am not saying that I recommend this process to anyone, only that it worked for me. It's quite possible that I could have done my own first flight and subsequent Phase 1 flying, and had no lasting bad experiences; but I do know that there were a number of minor issues that were immediately apparent upon that first lift off, and a rusty old pilot would have been busy. I wish all of you Pietenpol builders the pleasure I have experienced in the building process, and the pleasure of your eventual first flight! Gary Boothe NX308MB ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: pilot in command, Gary Boothe
From: "aerocarjake" <flight.jake(at)gmail.com>
Date: Oct 05, 2012
Congratulations Gary - very inspirational. Now, back down the shop for me. (see, it is inspirational...!) -------- Jake Schultz - curator, Newport Way Air Museum (OK, it's just my home) Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384733#384733 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: pilot in command, Gary Boothe
From: "aerocarjake" <flight.jake(at)gmail.com>
Date: Oct 05, 2012
Congratulations Gary - very inspirational. Now, back down the shop for me. (see, it is inspirational...!) -------- Jake Schultz - curator, Newport Way Air Museum (OK, it's just my home) Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384737#384737 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: From my CFI
From: "echobravo4" <eab4(at)comcast.net>
Date: Oct 05, 2012
Wow Gary That's awesome! -------- Earl Brown I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I intended to be. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384749#384749 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: AMsafetyC(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 05, 2012
Subject: Garys PIC
Hey Gary, That's great stuff, congratulations my friend, fly safe and enjoy! John ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Pietenpol Pilot - Now I are one!
From: "Mark Roberts" <mark.rbrts1(at)gmail.com>
Date: Oct 05, 2012
Well done Mr. Boothe!! I believe a cross country is in order.... To Fresno! Maybe we could talk the Groahs to fly up and have a mini convention... I'll bring my camera and notebook :D Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384768#384768 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: From my CFI
From: "Mark Roberts" <mark.rbrts1(at)gmail.com>
Date: Oct 05, 2012
What a great letter! Really puts it in perspective the value of what we decided to make ours! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384769#384769 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 06, 2012
From: shad bell <aviatorbell(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Pietenpol Pilot - Now I are one!
Glad to hear you are an "Oficial Piet Pilot".=C2- Congradulations Gary. =C2- Shad --- On Fri, 10/5/12, Robert Bush wrote: From: Robert Bush <rbush96589(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Pietenpol Pilot - Now I are one! Date: Friday, October 5, 2012, 10:13 AM Way to go Gary, happy for you! Randy Bush NX294RB Sent from my iPhone On Oct 4, 2012, at 10:52 PM, "Gary Boothe" wrote: =C2- Following are some musings about the Phase 1 flight testing for NX308MB =C2- Having not logged any time since 1984, I made the decision to turn over Pha se 1 testing to CFI/Test Pilot, Roy Richardson. I found that, when the time came, that brash confidence which dominated my flying in my youth had been replaced with a calmer patience. It had never been my intent to let someon e else have the pleasure of the first flight, but I couldn=99t ignore the good fortune of finding the right person at the right time. Certainly it would have been far less expensive to merely get current, then do my own test flights, and having over 200 hrs of tail wheel time I wasn=99t concerned about take offs and landings, but, for once in my life, I couldn =99t quiet that little voice, and Safety took the lead. =C2- Previously, I have explained my feelings of relief during the first few fli ghts, watching from a distance. Eventually, I became accustomed to my role as =98Crew Chief=99, tweaking, adjusting and repairing every bi g and little complaint that the pilot reported. As all of you who have buil t your own planes can testify, there is no trepidation about making repairs ; and, if you have also built your own engines, you have confidence there, too. To me, this became the final chapter of the building processw ithout any of the stress of those early flights. =C2- Roy addressed Phase 1 professionally, and quickly; flying the required 40 h ours in less than a month. He carried with him the =98Owner=99s Manual=99 that I had copied from someone else, making notations and changes where needed. We had long conversations about his discoveries (this was the first Pietenpol he had seen!), and how much he enjoyed how it flie s. Eager to get the opportunity to fly myself, I was glad that he devoted s o much time to it, and found the extra waiting time to be helpful in unders tanding what to expect. =C2- Flying with a CFI has never been relaxing or fun, but that flight, tonight, for me was still exciting and rewarding. The evening started with me stopp ing by the hangar to complete some maintenance, when Roy showed up. We star ted talking, and, wellyou knowone thing led to another an d pretty soon we up in the air, with me in the rear cockpit!! The BFR check ride went without issue and, before long, I was up by myself! I doubt if I am capable of describing those feelings, or at least doing justice to the w hole event (those who have been there will understand), but I can say that I think it was especially sweet knowing that I did not need to be concerned about the mechanics or design of my plane, and needed only to concentrate on my flying. =C2- Definetly, I am not saying that I recommend this process to anyone, only th at it worked for me. It=99s quite possible that I could have done my own first flight and subsequent Phase 1 flying, and had no lasting bad expe riences; but I do know that there were a number of minor issues that were i mmediately apparent upon that first lift off, and a rusty old pilot would h ave been busy. =C2- I wish all of you Pietenpol builders the pleasure I have experienced in the building process, and the pleasure of your eventual first flight! =C2- Gary Boothe NX308MB =C2- =C2- ========= >http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List ========= cs.com ========= matronics.com/contribution ========= ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 06, 2012
Subject: Piano hinge for aileron
From: John Fay <jfay1950(at)gmail.com>
I have a question for Michael Cuy or any others who have mounted their ailerons with piano hinge. How long does the hinge need to be? Is six feet long enough, or is it longer. And what size hinge is it? (How wide is it when it is opened up flat?) I am getting ready to order the hinge so I was wondering. John Fay in Peoria ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Hollywd
From: "TriScout" <apfelcyber(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Oct 06, 2012
Of interest: I came across a link of actors past and present that fly. There's an actress that had a Piet.. Michelle Goodeve (Apr 22, 1952). Tv actress, screenwriter. Owned Aeronca 7AC, de Havilland Tiger Moth, Luscombe, Piper Tri-Pacer, Pietenpol Air Camper. Aviation films: roles as pilot in tv series Barnstormers (2005), Danger Bay (1986), Vulcan EFTS (1987), White Fang (1993). http://www.aerofiles.com/00stars.html Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384820#384820 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 2012
Subject: Piano hinge for aileron
From: John Fay <jfay1950(at)gmail.com>
Thanks to all of you who replied to the question about the hinge you used for your ailerons. I know what I am going to order now. John Fay in Peoria ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "C N Campbell" <cncampbell(at)windstream.net>
Subject: Re: Piano hinge for aileron
Date: Oct 07, 2012
John, my aileron hinges are the MS 20257-5 from Aircraft Spruce. They are 6-feet long. They do not cover the complete length of the aileron. I split the difference at the ends of the hinge. Chuck ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Fay" <jfay1950(at)gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 10:36 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Piano hinge for aileron > > I have a question for Michael Cuy or any others who have mounted their > ailerons with piano hinge. > > How long does the hinge need to be? Is six feet long enough, or is it > longer. And what size hinge is it? (How wide is it when it is opened > up flat?) > I am getting ready to order the hinge so I was wondering. > > John Fay > in Peoria > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Piano hinge for aileron
From: "John Francis" <Mrkringles(at)msn.com>
Date: Oct 07, 2012
I'm dealing with the piano hinge now. The first image shows a pretty straight joint however the second shows how the hinge is bowed about a 1/16 of an inch along its' length. Should this be corrected with planing/sanding? -------- John Francis Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384845#384845 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc07741_187.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc07742_647.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Piano hinge for aileron
Date: Oct 07, 2012
John, My guess is, Yes, some straightening is called for, but the only area that matters is right at the hinge itself...2 hours of work, tops! Gary Boothe NX308MB -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Francis Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2012 8:26 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Piano hinge for aileron --> I'm dealing with the piano hinge now. The first image shows a pretty straight joint however the second shows how the hinge is bowed about a 1/16 of an inch along its' length. Should this be corrected with planing/sanding? -------- John Francis Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384845#384845 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc07741_187.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc07742_647.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Piano hinge for aileron
From: "tools" <n0kkj(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Oct 07, 2012
If your ribs are all the same, then the bow is being transmitted from the spar. So, might want to see if you can correct the bow with the anti-drag wires. If not, do like mentioned and just plane the wing and shim behind the hinge on the aileron (or glue in a little strip and reshape). You're definitely going to want that hinge as straight as possible. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384851#384851 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Phillips" <pietflyr(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Hollywd
Date: Oct 07, 2012
And here is a picture of her, with her Pietenpol. Maybe she should come to Brodhead one year? Jack Phillips NX899JP Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of TriScout Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 10:44 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Hollywd Of interest: I came across a link of actors past and present that fly. There's an actress that had a Piet.. Michelle Goodeve (Apr 22, 1952). Tv actress, screenwriter. Owned Aeronca 7AC, de Havilland Tiger Moth, Luscombe, Piper Tri-Pacer, Pietenpol Air Camper. Aviation films: roles as pilot in tv series Barnstormers (2005), Danger Bay (1986), Vulcan EFTS (1987), White Fang (1993). http://www.aerofiles.com/00stars.html Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384820#384820 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Hollywd
Date: Oct 07, 2012
She looks better in her gear than I do in mine. Gary Boothe NX308MB From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jack Phillips Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2012 9:13 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Hollywd And here is a picture of her, with her Pietenpol. Maybe she should come to Brodhead one year? Jack Phillips NX899JP Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of TriScout Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 10:44 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Hollywd Of interest: I came across a link of actors past and present that fly. There's an actress that had a Piet.. Michelle Goodeve (Apr 22, 1952). Tv actress, screenwriter. Owned Aeronca 7AC, de Havilland Tiger Moth, Luscombe, Piper Tri-Pacer, Pietenpol Air Camper. Aviation films: roles as pilot in tv series Barnstormers (2005), Danger Bay (1986), Vulcan EFTS (1987), White Fang (1993). http://www.aerofiles.com/00stars.html Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384820#384820 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Phillips" <pietflyr(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Hollywd
Date: Oct 07, 2012
Probably looks even better out of it. _____ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Gary Boothe Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2012 12:22 PM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Hollywd She looks better in her gear than I do in mine. Gary Boothe NX308MB From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jack Phillips Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2012 9:13 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Hollywd And here is a picture of her, with her Pietenpol. Maybe she should come to Brodhead one year? Jack Phillips NX899JP Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of TriScout Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 10:44 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Hollywd Of interest: I came across a link of actors past and present that fly. There's an actress that had a Piet.. Michelle Goodeve (Apr 22, 1952). Tv actress, screenwriter. Owned Aeronca 7AC, de Havilland Tiger Moth, Luscombe, Piper Tri-Pacer, Pietenpol Air Camper. Aviation films: roles as pilot in tv series Barnstormers (2005), Danger Bay (1986), Vulcan EFTS (1987), White Fang (1993). http://www.aerofiles.com/00stars.html Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384820#384820 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Piano hinge for aileron
From: "John Francis" <Mrkringles(at)msn.com>
Date: Oct 07, 2012
It appears the bump in the front aileron spar was transmitted via the ribs from a bump in the rear main wing spar which is hard to see with the ribs on. I won't trammel the wings to try to correct this as they are square and although you might be able to correct this bump, you would twist the wings out of whack someplace else. If you look closely at the attached image you will see a blue chalk line I just made and it shows the bump. A hand plane should remedy this but I will lose a 1/16 inch of material from that section of aileron spar. Should I glue some 1/16 inch plywood on the back side for support? -------- John Francis Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384854#384854 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc07744_390.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Piano hinge for aileron
Date: Oct 07, 2012
John, You only need to remove material at the top of the spar. I'm willing to bet your life that it won't matter. ;-) Gary Boothe NX308MB -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Francis Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2012 9:32 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Piano hinge for aileron --> It appears the bump in the front aileron spar was transmitted via the ribs from a bump in the rear main wing spar which is hard to see with the ribs on. I won't trammel the wings to try to correct this as they are square and although you might be able to correct this bump, you would twist the wings out of whack someplace else. If you look closely at the attached image you will see a blue chalk line I just made and it shows the bump. A hand plane should remedy this but I will lose a 1/16 inch of material from that section of aileron spar. Should I glue some 1/16 inch plywood on the back side for support? -------- John Francis Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384854#384854 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc07744_390.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 2012
From: Jim Boyer <boyerjrb(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Hollywd
Jack thanks for the pictures. It would be neat if she is still flying and still has the Piet. Jim B. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Piano hinge for aileron
From: "John Francis" <Mrkringles(at)msn.com>
Date: Oct 07, 2012
Correct Gary, just that 1" material the hinge attaches too. I still might add some plywood pieces under the bolts in that area since it is my life you are betting on. [Shocked] -------- John Francis Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384859#384859 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Hollywd
From: "Bill Church" <billspiet(at)sympatico.ca>
Date: Oct 07, 2012
Jim, Michelle still has the Piet, and just recovered it a few years ago. I tried posting a photo, but it wouldn't go through. I'll try again later when I'm at my home computer, where I have access to my photos. Bill C. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384861#384861 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Piano hinge for aileron
From: "tools" <n0kkj(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Oct 07, 2012
You're basically laminating on a piece of metal there, which is stronger than wood. The loss of wood isn't going to matter. MIGHT want to add a few extra screws in the part that attaches to the wing for piece of mind. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384862#384862 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 2012
From: Dave Millikan <n11dmx(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Piano hinge for aileron
I was going to use piano hinge too, then it dawned on me that the fastners were all in a line, not good soooo I went to Ace- Aircraft Supply and bot screen door hinges just like Bernard--- did. fasteners- spread the lod across the 3 inch or so beam. Dave- NX1QZ, Inverness,Fl --- On Sun, 10/7/12, John Francis wrote: From: John Francis <Mrkringles(at)msn.com> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Piano hinge for aileron Date: Sunday, October 7, 2012, 5:13 PM Correct Gary, just that 1" material the hinge attaches too.- I still migh t add some plywood pieces under the bolts in that area since it is my life you are betting on. [Shocked] -------- John Francis Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384859#384859 le, List Admin. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: wayne & cathy <catway(at)sympatico.ca>
Subject: Re: Hollywd http://youtu.be/Tc8FCFdiTPQ
Date: Oct 07, 2012
Michelle Goodeve is a canadian gal that has flown quite a number of clasic aircraft. she is a fixture around the tiger boys group in guelph ontario. she just recently restored a piet. that was found in a barn north of there . the video shows her having fun in the first cub in canada. at the end of the video is a shot of a thruxton jackeroo (the only one flying in the world) she usualy flys that at some point in time belonged to her and her husband. she has quite an aviation history. wayne in waterloo on. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dick N" <horzpool(at)goldengate.net>
Subject: Hollywd
Date: Oct 07, 2012
Hasnt anyone noticed the 6 cyl engine over her shoulder. That jumped out at me right away. Dick N. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Phillips" <pietflyr(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Hollywd http://youtu.be/Tc8FCFdiTPQ
Date: Oct 07, 2012
Can't some of you Canadians convince her to make an appearance at Brodhead next year? That would really be cool! Jack Phillips NX899JP Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia _____ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of wayne & cathy Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2012 2:18 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Hollywd http://youtu.be/Tc8FCFdiTPQ Michelle Goodeve is a canadian gal that has flown quite a number of clasic aircraft. she is a fixture around the tiger boys group in guelph ontario. she just recently restored a piet. that was found in a barn north of there . the video shows her having fun in the first cub in canada. at the end of the video is a shot of a thruxton jackeroo (the only one flying in the world) she usualy flys that at some point in time belonged to her and her husband. she has quite an aviation history. wayne in waterloo on. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Piano hinge for aileron
From: Gene Rambo <generambo(at)msn.com>
Date: Oct 07, 2012
I don't know about sanding. It is hard to tell from photo, but you might need to pop the false spar loose and shim it straight before reattaching it. On Oct 7, 2012, at 11:25 AM, "John Francis" wrote: > > I'm dealing with the piano hinge now. The first image shows a pretty straight joint however the second shows how the hinge is bowed about a 1/16 of an inch along its' length. Should this be corrected with planing/sanding? > > -------- > John Francis > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384845#384845 > > > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc07741_187.jpg > http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc07742_647.jpg > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 2012
From: shad bell <aviatorbell(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Piano hinge for aileron
You could simply shim the hinge streight with washers, shims etc, if it is ony 1/16 or so.- we have a washer/shim on one of our aileron hinges and i t hasn't been an issue in 320 hrs of flying. - Shad --- On Sun, 10/7/12, Gene Rambo wrote: From: Gene Rambo <generambo(at)msn.com> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Piano hinge for aileron Date: Sunday, October 7, 2012, 3:16 PM I don't know about sanding.- It is hard to tell from photo, but you might need to pop the false spar loose and shim it straight before reattaching i t. On Oct 7, 2012, at 11:25 AM, "John Francis" wrote: > > I'm dealing with the piano hinge now. The first image shows a pretty stra ight joint however the second shows how the hinge is bowed about a 1/16 of an inch along its' length. Should this be corrected with planing/sanding? > > -------- > John Francis > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384845#384845 > > > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc07741_187.jpg > http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc07742_647.jpg > > > > > > > > le, List Admin. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: First Years Progress
From: "DaveG601XL" <david.m.gallagher(at)ge.com>
Date: Oct 08, 2012
I have been working almost a year now on the GN-1 project I inherited from my father. I got it as a fuselage with A-65 engine, tail feathers and some wing ribs. In the meantime, I built an engine mount, made Cub gear, tore down, rebuilt and ran the engine, put in heel brakes, fit a Cub fuel tank, made both front and rear cockpit panels and started the center section. From a looks standpoint, probably the most important thing that I did was rid it of 30 years of cobwebs so it can stand proud. I hope to have the CS and turtle deck done over the winter and start the wings next spring. Before and after pictures below. -------- David Gallagher Zodiac 601 XL-B: flying, 220+ hours now Next project under construction: Finish my father's Aircamper Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384963#384963 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/pickup_01_542.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/1year_502.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: moving Scout
From: "Mark Roberts" <mark.rbrts1(at)gmail.com>
Date: Oct 08, 2012
Safe travels Oscar! I, for one, hope to shake hands with ya when you make that N. California trip. My SLO daughter just came home for a visit this week. I won't have my plane close to ready by then, but I can drive to where you land... :-) Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384972#384972 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: First Years Progress
From: gboothe5(at)comcast.net
Date: Oct 09, 2012
That GN1 will have a special story! Nice progress... Gary NX308MB ------Original Message------ From: DaveG601XL Sender: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com ReplyTo: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Pietenpol-List: First Years Progress Sent: Oct 8, 2012 6:32 PM I have been working almost a year now on the GN-1 project I inherited from my father. I got it as a fuselage with A-65 engine, tail feathers and some wing ribs. In the meantime, I built an engine mount, made Cub gear, tore down, rebuilt and ran the engine, put in heel brakes, fit a Cub fuel tank, made both front and rear cockpit panels and started the center section. From a looks standpoint, probably the most important thing that I did was rid it of 30 years of cobwebs so it can stand proud. I hope to have the CS and turtle deck done over the winter and start the wings next spring. Before and after pictures below. -------- David Gallagher Zodiac 601 XL-B: flying, 220+ hours now Next project under construction: Finish my father's Aircamper Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384963#384963 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/pickup_01_542.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/1year_502.jpg Sent on the Sprint Now Network from my BlackBerry ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: First Years Progress
From: helspersew(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 09, 2012
Dave, Did you save the prop that your brother Tim carved when he was in college? Dan Helsper Puryear, TN -----Original Message----- From: gboothe5 <gboothe5(at)comcast.net> Sent: Mon, Oct 8, 2012 11:25 pm Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: First Years Progress That GN1 will have a special story! Nice progress... Gary NX308MB ------Original Message------ From: DaveG601XL Sender: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com ReplyTo: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Pietenpol-List: First Years Progress Sent: Oct 8, 2012 6:32 PM m> I have been working almost a year now on the GN-1 project I inherited from my father. I got it as a fuselage with A-65 engine, tail feathers and some win g ribs. In the meantime, I built an engine mount, made Cub gear, tore down, rebuilt and ran the engine, put in heel brakes, fit a Cub fuel tank, made b oth front and rear cockpit panels and started the center section. From a looks standpoint, probably the most important thing that I did was rid it of 30 y ears of cobwebs so it can stand proud. I hope to have the CS and turtle deck do ne over the winter and start the wings next spring. Before and after pictures below. -------- David Gallagher Zodiac 601 XL-B: flying, 220+ hours now Next project under construction: Finish my father's Aircamper Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384963#384963 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/pickup_01_542.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/1year_502.jpg Sent on the Sprint=C2=AE Now Network from my BlackBerry=C2=AE ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Ball or bronze bearings in wheels?
From: "giacummo" <mario.giacummo(at)gmail.com>
Date: Oct 09, 2012
Hello; as always asking something. Is there any problem in use ball bearings than bronze in the wheels hubs?, and what kind of ball bearing I have to use if I decide to use them? Thank you in advance. Best regards. -------- Mario Giacummo http://vgmk1.blogspot.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384988#384988 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Phillips" <pietflyr(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Ball or bronze bearings in wheels?
Date: Oct 09, 2012
Hi Mario, I don't know about ball bearings for an axle application. I'm not sure how well they would react to side loading. Most people use bronze bushings. I used tapered roller bearings on mine and they have worked well. You can buy them from McMaster-Carrr: http://www.mcmaster.com/#standard-ball-and-roller-bearings/=jn8lp0 Jack Phillips NX899JP Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of giacummo Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 8:48 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Ball or bronze bearings in wheels? Hello; as always asking something. Is there any problem in use ball bearings than bronze in the wheels hubs?, and what kind of ball bearing I have to use if I decide to use them? Thank you in advance. Best regards. -------- Mario Giacummo http://vgmk1.blogspot.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384988#384988 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: First Years Progress
From: "DaveG601XL" <david.m.gallagher(at)ge.com>
Date: Oct 09, 2012
Dan, Yes, that is the prop brother Tim carved out of mahogany planks while in college. I am ever amazed and humbled by his craftsmanship. Hard to think we are of the same genes. One thing of note for those with sharp eyeballs. Even though this is a GN-1, I have changed the strut and wing attach to be Pietenpol so I can translate the wing for CG purposes. I also made the CS 6" wider after visiting with Skip Gadd and his project. I need a wider flop in order to help get my fat a$$ in and out. -------- David Gallagher Zodiac 601 XL-B: flying, 220+ hours now Next project under construction: Finish my father's Aircamper Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384991#384991 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Ball or bronze bearings in wheels?
From: "giacummo" <mario.giacummo(at)gmail.com>
Date: Oct 09, 2012
Thank you Jack, most than enough. regards -------- Mario Giacummo http://vgmk1.blogspot.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=384995#384995 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 09, 2012
From: Jim Boyer <boyerjrb(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: First Years Progress
Hi Dave, Its looking good. You have definitely turned it into a nice looking project. Keep at it you are not far from having a Pietenpol. Jim B. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: moving Scout
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Oct 09, 2012
Oscar, If you need a place to stay over night just let me know. I'm in Lancaster CA just 5 miles so. of KWJF (fox field). Plenty of room to park your moving truck at the house. Could save you a hotel bill. Heck, you may even eat better. -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385002#385002 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Evening With the Boyers
Date: Oct 09, 2012
Yesterday, I spent an enjoyable afternoon and evening with Jim Boyer, where he graciously allowed me to tinker with him on his engine. We set the starter, and timed the distributer. He's not too far from running his engine now! Afterward, Jim & Arlene took me out to dinner.What a deal! I might quit my job and do this full time! In typical Pietenpoler fashion, Jim offered me his Warp Drive prop while I re-carve a new one, as did Kevin Purtee. Gary Boothe NX308MB ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: First Years Progress
From: "taildrags" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 09, 2012
Dave; Although it will never be a Pietenpol (always a Grega), it looks beautiful! You have made a tremendous amount of progress in just a year. Welcome to the Air Camper/Aircamper fleet, one of the few places where slower is better, older is cooler, and you will always get more attention with your airplane on the ramp than any RV will ;o) -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385024#385024 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Clif Dawson" <cdawson5854(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Fw: spars
Date: Oct 09, 2012
Spars are now routed. thirteen pounds removed. Total spar weight now 261/2 lb. They are true fir ( not Douglas ) and 1" thick. The bit used is this one; http://www.leevalley.com/en/wood/page.aspx?p=30171&cat=1,46168,69435, 46173&ap=1 See that table with all the stuff on it? Well guess where my wing panels are supposed to be built? It took years to load it like that. Every single thing lovingly placed ( dumped ) and now just as lovingly needs a new home. Clif Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. Einstein ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 10, 2012
From: Dave and Connie <dmatt(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: First Years Progress
Dave; Although it will never be a Pietenpol (always a Grega), it looks beautiful! You have made a tremendous amount of progress in just a year. Welcome to the Air Camper/Aircamper fleet, one of the few places where slower is better, older is cooler, and you will always get more attention with your airplane on the ramp than any RV will ;o) -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385024#385024 ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: moving Scout
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Oct 10, 2012
Enjoy your IFR ( I follow roads) trip. Should you get lost, the offer still stands. -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385037#385037 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: moving Scout
Date: Oct 10, 2012
Not to worry. Oscar THINKS he can slip by us by taking the back roads, but I'll be running a blockade on 395 two days before Thanksgiving. He'll have to stop or crash into me! Gary Boothe NX308MB -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of AircamperN11MS Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 6:34 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: moving Scout --> Enjoy your IFR ( I follow roads) trip. Should you get lost, the offer still stands. -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385037#385037 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: moving Scout
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Oct 10, 2012
I put a request in to the weather gods. He will need to come over to the west side of CA due to snow falling on his planned route. Then he will have to visit us. -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385045#385045 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Fish Scale Thrust
From: "bender" <jfaith(at)solairusaviation.com>
Date: Oct 10, 2012
Not the scales on the side of a fish.. got the official piet prop carver fish scale from the prop man Dan Helsper via UPS today... and ran right out to try it. My A with homebuilt prop 76X42 was turning 1750 rpm per my 1930 moth tach and showed 275 lbs of fish scale thrust .... and smooth as butter. i taxied to the hangar next door for coffee and got to use the radio.. first time talking to the tower as "experimental 1929F".... the guys next door all got a kick out of it.. Jeff Faith SDF Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385054#385054 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Fish Scale Thrust
Date: Oct 10, 2012
Very cool, Jeff!! I'm glad you used the 'official' industrial fish scales, too. Your thrust sounds plenty good. Gary Boothe NX308MB -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of bender Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 10:23 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Fish Scale Thrust --> Not the scales on the side of a fish.. got the official piet prop carver fish scale from the prop man Dan Helsper via UPS today... and ran right out to try it. My A with homebuilt prop 76X42 was turning 1750 rpm per my 1930 moth tach and showed 275 lbs of fish scale thrust .... and smooth as butter. i taxied to the hangar next door for coffee and got to use the radio.. first time talking to the tower as "experimental 1929F".... the guys next door all got a kick out of it.. Jeff Faith SDF Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385054#385054 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 10, 2012
From: Jim Boyer <boyerjrb(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Evening With the Boyers
Gary said;=C2- where he graciously allowed me to tinker with him on his e ngine. We set the starter, and timed the distributer. He=99s not too far from running his engine now! Actually I was stuck and he really helped me get over the hump. It is alway s fun and enjoyable to have Gary stop and visit/help. I think thats one of the nice things about building a Piet; the other people building Pietenpols too. I am getting there now that I am retired I can and have been working on it more. Cheers, Jim B. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 10, 2012
From: Jim Boyer <boyerjrb(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Evening With the Boyers
Oh darn Kevin, you mean the Warp drive prop got dinged too! Reading your comments about the ailerons made me wonder how the right aileron managed to survive complete with hinges. Glad you are making such good progress rebuilding FBG. Cheers, Jim B. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fish Scale Thrust
From: helspersew(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 10, 2012
You are now good to go man. I registered 260 lbs. You have got plety of thr ust there Jeff!! No worries. Congratulations!! Dan Helsper Puryear, TN -----Original Message----- From: bender <jfaith(at)solairusaviation.com> Sent: Wed, Oct 10, 2012 12:23 pm Subject: Pietenpol-List: Fish Scale Thrust > Not the scales on the side of a fish.. got the official piet prop carver fish scale from the prop man Dan Helsper via UPS today... and ran right out to try it. My A with homebuilt prop 76X42 was turning 1750 rpm per my 1930 moth tach a nd showed 275 lbs of fish scale thrust .... and smooth as butter. i taxied to the hangar next door for coffee and got to use the radio.. firs t time talking to the tower as "experimental 1929F".... the guys next door al l got a kick out of it.. Jeff Faith SDF Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385054#385054 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fish Scale Thrust
From: "bender" <jfaith(at)solairusaviation.com>
Date: Oct 10, 2012
Hey Gary... here is an album http://s1125.photobucket.com/albums/l593/jfaithbass/ And Thanks a million Dan.... the scale will be back soon Jeff Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385069#385069 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 10, 2012
From: Dave Millikan <n11dmx(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: First Years Progress
What a coinidece.. We ara a Dave and Connie too. I,m 2 yrs into a Pete NX1QZ Wings and Tail done- Fuse 20 %,,. VW- engine. Dave, Inverness, Fla --- On Wed, 10/10/12, Dave and Connie wrote: From: Dave and Connie <dmatt(at)frontiernet.net> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: First Years Progress Date: Wednesday, October 10, 2012, 10:45 AM t> Dave; Although it will never be a Pietenpol (always a Grega), it looks beautiful! - You have made a tremendous amount of progress in just a year.- Welcom e to the Air Camper/Aircamper fleet, one of the few places where slower is better, older is cooler, and you will always get more attention with your a irplane on the ramp than any RV will ;o) -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385024#385024 ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com le, List Admin. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: TOM MICHELLE BRANT <tmbrant(at)msn.com>
Subject: cable and fittings
Date: Oct 10, 2012
I thought I recently saw a thread on this but cannot find it.. So - sorry if this has been asked recently.. Was wondering if I use stainless cable=2C do I use copper=2C aluminum or zi nc crimps / thimbles=2C etc.. Seems odd that they wouldn't have stainless fittings to go along with it but I cannot find them anywhere. Same questio n if I were to use galvanized cable - although that seems more clear that I would use zinc fittings. Specifically=2C looking at doing the drag/anti-d rag wires in the wings. Thanks=2C Tom B. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: computer & internet
From: "zieglera" <ziegleradevid(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Oct 10, 2012
Does sharing internet make the internet slow down on one computer? I have a pc and wireless laptop connected with a router. The internet on the laptop is fine. When the laptop is connected it makes my computer internet slow, the internet is slow not the computer. When the laptop is not connected the internet on the computer works fine. -------- my life my way Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385095#385095 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "C N Campbell" <cncampbell(at)windstream.net>
Subject: Re: cable and fittings
Date: Oct 11, 2012
Tom, somewhere someone said not to use stainless cable but I can't remember the reason. I am using galvanized 3/32 cable with zinc plated copper crimps. If one is put on improperly it is a bear to get off. You have to cut the fitting in about four places to pry the crimp off. This is in places where you don't want to cut the cable. Chuck C. Do not save. ----- Original Message ----- From: TOM MICHELLE BRANT To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 8:46 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: cable and fittings I thought I recently saw a thread on this but cannot find it.. So - sorry if this has been asked recently.. Was wondering if I use stainless cable, do I use copper, aluminum or zinc crimps / thimbles, etc.. Seems odd that they wouldn't have stainless fittings to go along with it but I cannot find them anywhere. Same question if I were to use galvanized cable - although that seems more clear that I would use zinc fittings. Specifically, looking at doing the drag/anti-drag wires in the wings. Thanks, Tom B. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 11, 2012
From: Michael Perez <speedbrake(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: cable and fittings
For the record, I have SS cables exclusively on my plane. (STILL building...) >From what I gather, copper or zinc sleeves for steel and galvanized wire rope, tin plated copper or 304 SS sleeves for SS wire rope. 304 SS sleeves are available from McMaster. Michael Perez Pietenpol HINT Videos Karetaker Aero www.karetakeraero.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Wheels
From: "K5YAC" <hangar10(at)cox.net>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
After several months of waiting, I finally get to look at my completed wheels. I purchased my hubs from Ken Perkins back in the spring and sent them out to Buchanan's to get spokes cut and rims drilled. Received them back on April 19... had them at the powder coater April 20, and then they sat at the local motorcycle shop for over two months! I finally just went and picked them up with the intention of lacing them up on my own sometime. Well, sometime finally came... a friend of mine stopped by the hangar the other day... as he's looking around he says, "what with those wheels?" I explained that I wasn't ready to pull my hair out yet, and that I was saving them for a cold winter day. He grabs a rim, a hub and a hand full of spokes and proceeds to lace one up in under an hour. I forgot that he was a bicycle guy, and it never dawned on me to ask him for help. He came back by last night and laced the other one, and now has them at his house on his truing rig. As much as I wanted to learn to lace wheels (not)... I sure do appreciate him getting them put together for me. -------- Mark Chouinard Wings, Center Section and Empannage and Fuse framed up - Working on Landing Gear Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385109#385109 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc01475_135.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_0698_249.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
Subject: Wheels
Your wire wheels look great Mark and way to go, hat's off to the gent who laced and is truing your wheels for you. You could easily do this yourself but the learning curve is steep for the first wheel but as with all Pietenpol building the second 'anything' goes much faster. They look great--are you planning on using any brakes? Steel landing gear legs or wood? Mike C. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wheels
From: "K5YAC" <hangar10(at)cox.net>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
Thanks Mike... I'm sure I could have done it, but wasn't something I was looking forward to. With a fellow standing there that wanted to pitch in, I was glad he found something he could accomplish. Some things I really want to do on my own without a bunch of you know what I would do comments or interruptions... wheels isn't one of them. In the process of building steel tube gear and plan disc brakes with the Comet calipers like many of you are using. -------- Mark Chouinard Wings, Center Section and Empannage and Fuse framed up - Working on Landing Gear Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385112#385112 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fish Scale Thrust
From: "bender" <jfaith(at)solairusaviation.com>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
according to this calculator i found .... punching in the numbers .. my engine is making 51 HP with the thrust being within 2 lbs of what the calculator says for that pitch and length at 1750 rpm http://personal.osi.hu/fuzesisz/strc_eng/index.htm Jeff Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385113#385113 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 11, 2012
Subject: Wheels
From: Jim Markle <jim_markle(at)mindspring.com>
VGhhdCdzIGV4Y2VsbGVudCEKClNlbnQgdmlhIHNtYXJ0cGhvbmUuLi4uSzVZQUMgPGhhbmdhcjEw QGNveC5uZXQ+IHdyb3RlOi0tPiBQaWV0ZW5wb2wtTGlzdCBtZXNzYWdlIHBvc3RlZCBieTogIks1 WUFDIiA8aGFuZ2FyMTBAY294Lm5ldD4KCkFmdGVyIHNldmVyYWwgbW9udGhzIG9mIHdhaXRpbmcs IEkgZmluYWxseSBnZXQgdG8gbG9vayBhdCBteSBjb21wbGV0ZWQgd2hlZWxzLsKgIEkgcHVyY2hh c2VkIG15IGh1YnMgZnJvbSBLZW4gUGVya2lucyBiYWNrIGluIHRoZSBzcHJpbmcgYW5kIHNlbnQg dGhlbSBvdXQgdG8gQnVjaGFuYW4ncyB0byBnZXQgc3Bva2VzIGN1dCBhbmQgcmltcyBkcmlsbGVk LsKgIFJlY2VpdmVkIHRoZW0gYmFjayBvbiBBcHJpbCAxOS4uLiBoYWQgdGhlbSBhdCB0aGUgcG93 ZGVyIGNvYXRlciBBcHJpbCAyMCwgYW5kIHRoZW4gdGhleSBzYXQgYXQgdGhlIGxvY2FsIG1vdG9y Y3ljbGUgc2hvcCBmb3Igb3ZlciB0d28gbW9udGhzIcKgIEkgZmluYWxseSBqdXN0IHdlbnQgYW5k IHBpY2tlZCB0aGVtIHVwIHdpdGggdGhlIGludGVudGlvbiBvZiBsYWNpbmcgdGhlbSB1cCBvbiBt eSBvd24gc29tZXRpbWUuwqAgV2VsbCwgc29tZXRpbWUgZmluYWxseSBjYW1lLi4uIGEgZnJpZW5k IG9mIG1pbmUgc3RvcHBlZCBieSB0aGUgaGFuZ2FyIHRoZSBvdGhlciBkYXkuLi4gYXMgaGUncyBs b29raW5nIGFyb3VuZCBoZSBzYXlzLCAid2hhdCB3aXRoIHRob3NlIHdoZWVscz8iwqAgSSBleHBs YWluZWQgdGhhdCBJIHdhc24ndCByZWFkeSB0byBwdWxsIG15IGhhaXIgb3V0IHlldCwgYW5kIHRo YXQgSSB3YXMgc2F2aW5nIHRoZW0gZm9yIGEgY29sZCB3aW50ZXIgZGF5LsKgIEhlIGdyYWJzIGEg cmltLCBhIGh1YiBhbmQgYSBoYW5kIGZ1bGwgb2Ygc3Bva2VzIGFuZCBwcm9jZWVkcyB0byBsYWNl IG9uZSB1cCBpbiB1bmRlciBhbiBob3VyLsKgIEkgZm9yZ290IHRoYXQgaGUgd2FzIGEgYmljeWNs ZSBndXksIGFuZCBpdCBuZXZlciBkYXduZWQgb24gbWUgdG8gYXNrIGhpbSBmb3IgaGVscC7CoCBI ZSBjYW1lIGJhY2sgYnkgbGFzdCBuaWdodCBhbmQgbGFjZWQgdGhlIG90aGVyIG9uZSwgYW5kIG5v dyBoYXMgdGhlbSBhdCBoaXMgaG91c2Ugb24gaGlzIHRydWluZyByaWcuwqAgQXMgbXVjaCBhIQpz IEkgd2FudGVkIHRvIGxlYXJuIHRvIGxhY2Ugd2hlZWxzIChub3QpLi4uIEkgc3VyZSBkbyBhcHBy ZWNpYXRlIGhpbSBnZXR0aW5nIHRoZW0gcHV0IHRvZ2V0aGVyIGZvciBtZS4KCi0tLS0tLS0tCk1h cmsgQ2hvdWluYXJkCldpbmdzLCBDZW50ZXIgU2VjdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1wYW5uYWdlIGFuZCBGdXNl IGZyYW1lZCB1cCAtIFdvcmtpbmcgb24gTGFuZGluZyBHZWFyCgoKCgoKClJlYWQgdGhpcyB0b3Bp YyBvbmxpbmUgaGVyZToKCmh0dHA6Ly9mb3J1bXMubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS92aWV3dG9waWMucGhw P3A9Mzg1MTA5IzM4NTEwOQoKCgoKQXR0YWNobWVudHM6IAoKaHR0cDovL2ZvcnVtcy5tYXRyb25p Y3MuY29tLy9maWxlcy9kc2MwMTQ3NV8xMzUuanBnCmh0dHA6Ly9mb3J1bXMubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNv bS8vZmlsZXMvaW1nXzA2OThfMjQ5LmpwZwoKCgoKXy09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0KXy09wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKg IC0gVGhlIFBpZXRlbnBvbC1MaXN0IEVtYWlsIEZvcnVtIC0KXy09IFVzZSB0aGUgTWF0cm9uaWNz IExpc3QgRmVhdHVyZXMgTmF2aWdhdG9yIHRvIGJyb3dzZQpfLT0gdGhlIG1hbnkgTGlzdCB1dGls aXRpZXMgc3VjaCBhcyBMaXN0IFVuL1N1YnNjcmlwdGlvbiwKXy09IEFyY2hpdmUgU2VhcmNoICYg RG93bmxvYWQsIDctRGF5IEJyb3dzZSwgQ2hhdCwgRkFRLApfLT0gUGhvdG9zaGFyZSwgYW5kIG11 Y2ggbXVjaCBtb3JlOgpfLT0KXy09wqDCoCAtLT4gaHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL05h dmlnYXRvcj9QaWV0ZW5wb2wtTGlzdApfLT0KXy09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0KXy09wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDC oMKgwqDCoCAtIE1BVFJPTklDUyBXRUIgRk9SVU1TIC0KXy09IFNhbWUgZ3JlYXQgY29udGVudCBh bHNvIGF2YWlsYWJsZSB2aWEgdGhlIFdlYiBGb3J1bXMhCl8tPQpfLT3CoMKgIC0tPiBodHRwOi8v Zm9ydW1zLm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20KXy09Cl8tPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09Cl8tPcKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDC oCAtIExpc3QgQ29udHJpYnV0aW9uIFdlYiBTaXRlIC0KXy09wqAgVGhhbmsgeW91IGZvciB5b3Vy IGdlbmVyb3VzIHN1cHBvcnQhCl8tPcKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDC oMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAgLU1hdHQgRHJhbGxlLCBMaXN0IEFkbWluLgpfLT3CoMKg IC0tPiBodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vY29udHJpYnV0aW9uCl8tPT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09CgoKCg= ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wheels
From: gboothe5(at)comcast.net
Date: Oct 11, 2012
Mark, I think it is very cool that you have contributions from others! That makes for a really nice story... Gary NX308MB ------Original Message------ From: K5YAC Sender: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com ReplyTo: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Pietenpol-List: Wheels Sent: Oct 11, 2012 8:50 AM After several months of waiting, I finally get to look at my completed wheels. I purchased my hubs from Ken Perkins back in the spring and sent them out to Buchanan's to get spokes cut and rims drilled. Received them back on April 19... had them at the powder coater April 20, and then they sat at the local motorcycle shop for over two months! I finally just went and picked them up with the intention of lacing them up on my own sometime. Well, sometime finally came... a friend of mine stopped by the hangar the other day... as he's looking around he says, "what with those wheels?" I explained that I wasn't ready to pull my hair out yet, and that I was saving them for a cold winter day. He grabs a rim, a hub and a hand full of spokes and proceeds to lace one up in under an hour. I forgot that he was a bicycle guy, and it never dawned on me to ask him for help. He came back by last night and laced the other one, and now has them at his house on his truing rig. As much a! s I wanted to learn to lace wheels (not)... I sure do appreciate him getting them put together for me. -------- Mark Chouinard Wings, Center Section and Empannage and Fuse framed up - Working on Landing Gear Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385109#385109 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc01475_135.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_0698_249.jpg Sent on the Sprint Now Network from my BlackBerry ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wheels
From: "K5YAC" <hangar10(at)cox.net>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
I'm just hoping I can squeak under that 51% rule. [Laughing] -------- Mark Chouinard Wings, Center Section and Empannage and Fuse framed up - Working on Landing Gear Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385116#385116 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wheels
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
Mark, Nobody will even notice the girls standing next to the plane with wheels like that. Fantastic. -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385117#385117 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Tubing Coping
From: "K5YAC" <hangar10(at)cox.net>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
Here is a really cool tool that a friend of mine showed me yesterday yes, the same guy that laced my wheels. Hey, he is a 26 year-old pilot, P.E., neighbor and co-worker. A pretty sharp kid who is currently building his own bicycle hes been talking like he might like to try an airplane next. Anyhow, I told him that I was struggling a bit with how I might shape the tubing for my landing gear where it meets my axles without wasting a lot of material. I described a method that I saw on EAA Hints for Homebuilders using the poster board and attempting to crumple the ends and cut a template. He told me of a cycle design program that would print the necessary template by inputting the intersecting tubes and their angles. So, by utilizing Pythagoras Theorem we can figure the angles and leg length, then using the cycle building program we can produce a very accurate template for coping a nicely fitted joint. Ive not tried this yet, but he has and it looks like it works great. We even found some free coping calculators on the web this one seems pretty straightforward. http://www.metalgeek.com/static/cope.pcgi Coping seems to be fairly simple with thin walled and small diameter tubing, but it is much more difficult (and potentially costly) with large diameter and heavy walled tubing. I hope this will keep me from scrapping my material. -------- Mark Chouinard Wings, Center Section and Empannage and Fuse framed up - Working on Landing Gear Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385118#385118 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wheels
From: "echobravo4" <eab4(at)comcast.net>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
Very cool! I've got about 6 years in a bike shop and am really looking forward to lacing mine -------- Earl Brown I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I intended to be. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385119#385119 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 11, 2012
Subject: Tubing Coping
From: Jim Markle <jim_markle(at)mindspring.com>
VGhhdCdzIGNvb2wgc3R1ZmYhCgpKdXN0IHJlbWVtYmVyIHRvIG1ha2UgdGhlIHRlbXBsYXRlIGFj Y3VyYXRlIGZvciB0aGUgSUQgYW5kIG5vdCB0aGUgT0Qgb2YgdGhlIHBpcGUsIG1vcmUgYW5kIG1v cmUgY3JpdGljYWwgYXMgdGhlIHdhbGwgdGhpY2tuZXNzIGluY3JlYXNlcy4uLi4uSSBsZWFybmVk IHRoYXQgbGVzc29uIHRoZSBoYXJkIHdheSEKCgpTZW50IHZpYSBzbWFydHBob25lLi4uLks1WUFD IDxoYW5nYXIxMEBjb3gubmV0PiB3cm90ZTotLT4gUGlldGVucG9sLUxpc3QgbWVzc2FnZSBwb3N0 ZWQgYnk6ICJLNVlBQyIgPGhhbmdhcjEwQGNveC5uZXQ+CgpIZXJlIGlzIGEgcmVhbGx5IGNvb2wg dG9vbCB0aGF0IGEgZnJpZW5kIG9mIG1pbmUgc2hvd2VkIG1lIHllc3RlcmRhecOiwoDCpiB5ZXMs IHRoZSBzYW1lIGd1eSB0aGF0IGxhY2VkIG15IHdoZWVscy7CoCBIZXksIGhlIGlzIGEgMjYgeWVh ci1vbGQgcGlsb3QsIFAuRS4sIG5laWdoYm9yIGFuZCBjby13b3JrZXIuwqAgQSBwcmV0dHkgc2hh cnAga2lkIHdobyBpcyBjdXJyZW50bHkgYnVpbGRpbmcgaGlzIG93biBiaWN5Y2xlw6LCgMKmIGhl w6LCgMKZcyBiZWVuIHRhbGtpbmcgbGlrZSBoZSBtaWdodCBsaWtlIHRvIHRyeSBhbiBhaXJwbGFu ZSBuZXh0LsKgIEFueWhvdywgSSB0b2xkIGhpbSB0aGF0IEkgd2FzIHN0cnVnZ2xpbmcgYSBiaXQg d2l0aCBob3cgSSBtaWdodCBzaGFwZSB0aGUgdHViaW5nIGZvciBteSBsYW5kaW5nIGdlYXIgd2hl cmUgaXQgbWVldHMgbXkgYXhsZXMgd2l0aG91dCB3YXN0aW5nIGEgbG90IG9mIG1hdGVyaWFsLsKg IEkgZGVzY3JpYmVkIGEgbWV0aG9kIHRoYXQgSSBzYXcgb24gRUFBIEhpbnRzIGZvciBIb21lYnVp bGRlcnMgdXNpbmcgdGhlIHBvc3RlciBib2FyZCBhbmQgYXR0ZW1wdGluZyB0byBjcnVtcGxlIHRo ZSBlbmRzIGFuZCBjdXQgYSB0ZW1wbGF0ZS7CoCBIZSB0b2xkIG1lIG9mIGEgY3ljbGUgZGVzaWdu IHByb2dyYW0gdGhhdCB3b3VsZCBwcmludCB0aGUgbmVjZXNzYXJ5IHRlbXBsYXRlIGJ5IGlucHV0 dGluZyB0aGUgaW50ZXJzZWN0aW5nIHR1YmVzIGFuZCB0aGVpciBhbmdsZXMuwqAgCgpTbywgYnkg dXRpbGl6aW5nIFB5dGhhZ29yYcOiwoDCmXMgVGhlb3JlbSB3ZSBjYW4gZmlndXJlIHRoZSBhbmds ZXMgYW5kIGxlZyBsZW5ndGgsIHRoZW4gdXNpbmcgdGhlIGN5Y2xlIGJ1aWxkaW5nIHByb2dyYW0g d2UgY2FuIHByb2R1Y2UgYSB2ZXJ5IGFjY3VyYXRlIHRlbXBsYXRlIGZvciBjb3BpbmcgYSBuaWNl bHkgZml0dGVkIGpvaW50LsKgIEnDosKAwpl2ZSBub3QgdHJpZWQgdGhpcyB5ZXQsIGJ1dCBoZSBo YXMgYW5kIGl0IGxvb2tzIGxpa2UgaXQgd29ya3MgZ3JlYXQuwqAgV2UgZXZlbiBmb3VuZCBzb21l IGZyZWUgY29waW5nIGNhbGN1bGF0b3JzIG9uIHRoZSB3ZWLDosKAwqYgdGhpcyBvbmUgc2VlbXMg cHJldHR5IHN0cmFpZ2h0Zm9yd2FyZC4gCgpodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1ldGFsZ2Vlay5jb20vc3RhdGlj L2NvcGUucGNnaQoKQ29waW5nIHNlZW1zIHRvIGJlIGZhaXJseSBzaW1wbGUgd2l0aCB0aGluIHdh bGxlZCBhbmQgc21hbGwgZGlhbWV0ZXIgdHViaW5nLCBidXQgaXQgaXMgbXVjaCBtb3JlIGRpZmZp Y3VsdCAoYW5kIHBvdGVudGlhbGx5IGNvc3RseSkgd2l0aCBsYXJnZSBkaWFtZXRlciBhbmQgaGVh dnkgd2FsbGVkIHR1YmluZy7CoCBJIGhvcGUgdGhpcyB3aWxsIGtlZXAgbWUgZnJvbSBzY3JhcHBp bmcgbXkgbWF0ZXJpYWwuCgotLS0tLS0tLQpNYXJrIENob3VpbmFyZApXaW5ncywgQ2VudGVyIFNl Y3Rpb24gYW5kIEVtcGFubmFnZSBhbmQgRnVzZSBmcmFtZWQgdXAgLSBXb3JraW5nIG9uIExhbmRp bmcgR2VhcgoKCgoKCgpSZWFkIHRoaXMgdG9waWMgb25saW5lIGhlcmU6CgpodHRwOi8vZm9ydW1z Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vdmlld3RvcGljLnBocD9wPTM4NTExOCMzODUxMTgKCgoKCgoKCl8tPT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 Cl8tPcKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoCAtIFRoZSBQaWV0ZW5wb2wtTGlzdCBFbWFpbCBGb3J1bSAt Cl8tPSBVc2UgdGhlIE1hdHJvbmljcyBMaXN0IEZlYXR1cmVzIE5hdmlnYXRvciB0byBicm93c2UK Xy09IHRoZSBtYW55IExpc3QgdXRpbGl0aWVzIHN1Y2ggYXMgTGlzdCBVbi9TdWJzY3JpcHRpb24s Cl8tPSBBcmNoaXZlIFNlYXJjaCAmIERvd25sb2FkLCA3LURheSBCcm93c2UsIENoYXQsIEZBUSwK Xy09IFBob3Rvc2hhcmUsIGFuZCBtdWNoIG11Y2ggbW9yZToKXy09Cl8tPcKgwqAgLS0+IGh0dHA6 Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9OYXZpZ2F0b3I/UGlldGVucG9sLUxpc3QKXy09Cl8tPT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09Cl8t PcKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAgLSBNQVRST05JQ1MgV0VCIEZPUlVNUyAtCl8t PSBTYW1lIGdyZWF0IGNvbnRlbnQgYWxzbyBhdmFpbGFibGUgdmlhIHRoZSBXZWIgRm9ydW1zIQpf LT0KXy09wqDCoCAtLT4gaHR0cDovL2ZvcnVtcy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tCl8tPQpfLT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQpfLT3C oMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAgLSBMaXN0IENvbnRyaWJ1dGlvbiBXZWIgU2l0ZSAtCl8t PcKgIFRoYW5rIHlvdSBmb3IgeW91ciBnZW5lcm91cyBzdXBwb3J0IQpfLT3CoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDC oMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgIC1NYXR0IERyYWxs ZSwgTGlzdCBBZG1pbi4KXy09wqDCoCAtLT4gaHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL2NvbnRy aWJ1dGlvbgpfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PQoKCgo ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Tubing Coping
From: "K5YAC" <hangar10(at)cox.net>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
I suppose that one could change the dimensions to end up with a correct OD print. For example... if I were using 1.5" tubing, couldn't I enter 1.6" tube with .100" wall and end up with a template suitable for the OD of my 1.5" tube? Might try that on a test piece. The software that my friend has actually prints two lines... one for the OD and another for the taper needed to achieve the proper ID fit. -------- Mark Chouinard Wings, Center Section and Empannage and Fuse framed up - Working on Landing Gear Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385121#385121 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 11, 2012
From: Jim Markle <jim_markle(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Tubing Coping
If the application is printing od (not important) and id (VERY important), you're good to go! Oh yeah, and that 51% rule? That's for work done....NOT how many parts just magically show up at your hangar!!! -----Original Message----- >From: K5YAC <hangar10(at)cox.net> >Sent: Oct 11, 2012 1:44 PM >To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Tubing Coping > > >I suppose that one could change the dimensions to end up with a correct OD print. For example... if I were using 1.5" tubing, couldn't I enter 1.6" tube with .100" wall and end up with a template suitable for the OD of my 1.5" tube? Might try that on a test piece. > >The software that my friend has actually prints two lines... one for the OD and another for the taper needed to achieve the proper ID fit. > >-------- >Mark Chouinard >Wings, Center Section and Empannage and Fuse framed up - Working on Landing Gear > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385121#385121 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Tubing Coping
From: "K5YAC" <hangar10(at)cox.net>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
I'm not sure that I'm clear on you "OD not important" comment, Jim. If one were to cut the OD to the ID measurement, it might become important, right? I mean, depending on which side of the angle you may be working on, it would seem that the ID could be the longer dimension, whereas the opposing side of the angle would make it the shorter dimension, meaning that you would suddenly be lacking material for a proper fit. I'm told that the template actually accounts for the angle, leaving the greater dimension for all sides of the fit, therefore allowing material for final shaping after the finishing cut. Worst case, I suppose that the builder just needs to visualize the fitted application and anticipate where to cut and where NOT to cut (all the way to the line) in order to achieve the proper fit, but I would think that the OD would be the important measurement since that is where we are applying the template. I mean, if we were to apply the ID measurements, the template wouldn't even fit around the tube, especially where a thick wall were being used. On my previous thought... another way to eliminate the ID/OD difference is to indicate the proper tube diameter, but input a thin wall, say .035 (or less) instead of .120 or whatever may be used. -------- Mark Chouinard Wings, Center Section and Empannage and Fuse framed up - Working on Landing Gear Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385126#385126 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wheels
From: Amsafetyc <amsafetyc(at)aol.com>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
I know a guy that has a set of wheels you can practice on. Just let me know when you want to start on them John Sent from my iPhone On Oct 11, 2012, at 2:30 PM, "echobravo4" wrote: > > Very cool! > I've got about 6 years in a bike shop > and am really looking forward to lacing > mine > > -------- > Earl Brown > > I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I intended to be. > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385119#385119 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Mounting Ailerons
From: "John Francis" <Mrkringles(at)msn.com>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
Today I glued up more of my aileron and mounted the piano hinge to the aileron spar attached to the wing. Now I must figure out how to accurately mount the aileron to the hinge. If you've done this before you will know what I am talking about and the challenges of marking the aileron spar correctly. Any bright ideas out there? -------- John Francis Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385136#385136 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc07759_150.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Wood gear leg material?
From: "FandS_Piet" <fkim79(at)gmail.com>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
Im ready to order spruce for my wood gear and am wondering if I should by spar stock that is 2 3/4" x 1" and rip it down or cap strip that comes 2 1/2" x 1 and is about half the price. I wasnt sure if the capstrip was high enough quality spruce to use for the gear. Thanks -------- Fred Kim Pittsburgh, Pa Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385139#385139 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Brazed 4130
From: "FandS_Piet" <fkim79(at)gmail.com>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
I have done alot of research about brazing 4130 and it was easy to come to the conclusion that, to say the the least it is not advisable. Unfortunately the research was done after we have already brazed some of our metal fittings. Now knowing it should not be done my question is, is there anybody that is flying with brazed 4130? -------- Fred Kim Pittsburgh, Pa Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385140#385140 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Brazed 4130
From: "tools" <n0kkj(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
This is a tough one. After having done A LOT of research like I'm sure you have, I've come to the conclusion that it's alright. There's lots of reports about how the grain structure of 4130 will open SO MUCH you can actually see it, but I've never seen pictures... I've not seen any real authoritative source saying it's a dangerous practice. All the naysayers seem to have secondhand information as to why it's bad. However, practically ALL 4130 bicycle frames built in Europe are brazed, with no ill effects that I'm aware of. While they're not flying yet, I've brazed a number of parts for a biplane I'm helping to restore, an old J-1 Standard. The old parts were regular steel that had been brazed, so they could not then be welded to 4130 because of the contamination. That being said, if you've run across some info you really trust that says you shouldn't, forward it along please. The parts I brazed on the standard are bellcranks to a torque tube in the control system, so they're REALLY important. I did as much reading as I could. I personally felt the bellcranks would fail before the joint let loose. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385144#385144 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wood gear leg material?
From: "tools" <n0kkj(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
The only issue here is whether or not it's straight and free from defects (wind shakes, ie compression failures, knots, etc). If it is, the quality is high enough. There's no problem with gluing up to get the required width if that's an issue. The biggest issue is making sure the legs fit the fittings well and tightly. If they don't and get to moving, you're going to have a problem. Spruce isn't very strong (it's the best strength to weight ratio, far from strong), so a good fit amongst those pieces is critical. Especially in the fittings on the fuselage as there isn't much surface area between them and the legs. Many folks opt in increase the size of those fittings. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385145#385145 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Mounting Ailerons
From: "tools" <n0kkj(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
One trick is to use #2 screws with large area washers. That'll give you some lateral adjustment. Once you're in place, drill in place for the vacant and adjacent holes to the correct size, then replace the #2's with whatever you're using, I imagine #4's or #6's. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385147#385147 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Mounting Ailerons
From: "John Francis" <Mrkringles(at)msn.com>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
Thanks Tools, I like that idea. -------- John Francis Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385149#385149 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Gerry Holland <gholland@content-stream.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Brazed 4130
Date: Oct 12, 2012
Fred Hi from England I have been flying a Corben Junior with brazed 4130 frame. It was built at least 50 years ago. A few weeks ago I had a violent crash in the aircraft and it's now completely written off. My reasoning for replying is that the frame held together at all brazed joints and although the frame is distorted and bent no brazing looks to have split or failed. I cant give you any details on brazing type as I didn't construct but it was a USA build. The strength afforded by the 4130 fuselage frame is incredible and I would seek out that type of construction again. Wood too is impressive for strength and has probably an advantage of absorbing shock. It's a debate we'll end now!!! As an aside. some small structural repairs and modifications I have made over the years and TIG was used in all those cases but not in area of braze directly. Regards Gerry ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wheels
From: "echobravo4" <eab4(at)comcast.net>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
John I'll let you know when I'm ready to start no the wheels and you can get ahold of "That guy"! -------- Earl Brown I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I intended to be. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385152#385152 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Tubing Coping
From: "K5YAC" <hangar10(at)cox.net>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
Jim... where did you go? Am I missing something on the tubing coping? -------- Mark Chouinard Wings, Center Section and Empannage and Fuse framed up - Working on Landing Gear Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385156#385156 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Tubing Coping
From: "tools" <n0kkj(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
I'm pretty certain it pertains to the fact that the fit of the outside of the tubing isn't as important as the fit of the circumference of the inner diameter. That's because any gap visible from the outside can be welded in, in fact, purposely creating that situation gives you a little "v" to weld in. In the case of a good fit with the outside diameter, but poor fit on the inner essentially leaves you with a thinner pipe to weld on. In any case, your reasoning is correct. With this program (pretty cool by the way, nice find!) I'd set the thickness of the tubing to .001 for an accurate pattern to follow for the outside diameter. Then, try to visualize exactly what is going on when you grind, file or cut to shape to make sure you don't "undercut". If you delibrately err the other way, you'll merely have to file away a portion of the thickness of the tubing as you fit to get a perfect union. You can then rest assured you'll have a good fitting inner and outer diameters, and will weld up securely. Make sure to "clock code" the patterns so they orient correctly, like welding on yoke fittings on a drive shaft. You could probably also youtube how to cope home molding to help you visualize what's going when you cope. There are actually other methods of generating the shape to follow right on the tubing, utilizing only miter cuts on an abrasive saw, cold saw, bandsaw, whatever. Knowing how that works will make using this shape generation method, make more sense. Also, play around with the tubing thickness and watch the shape change. The minimum thickness it will accept is SOMETHING bigger than zero, and SOMETHING less than 1/2 the diameter of the tubing. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385161#385161 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Oscar Zuniga <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: official fish scales
Date: Oct 11, 2012
How does one go about getting on the circulation list for the Official Fish Scales? It seems that the Scales have so far been limited to use by prop carvers=2C but I would be interested in knowing how Scout fares with the A7 5 and wood prop. I also have a Prince prop for it and would be interested in a "fish head to fish head" comparison between the two if I had the scale s available and could run one and then the other. I will not have Scout up here and ready for testing until November=2C but w ould be happy to pay shipping over and back if the Official Scales are avai lable to non-carvers. Oscar Zuniga Medford=2C OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Tubing Coping
From: "K5YAC" <hangar10(at)cox.net>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
tools wrote: > In any case, your reasoning is correct. With this program (pretty cool by the way, nice find!) I'd set the thickness of the tubing to .001 for an accurate pattern to follow for the outside diameter. Then, try to visualize exactly what is going on when you grind, file or cut to shape to make sure you don't "undercut". If you delibrately err the other way, you'll merely have to file away a portion of the thickness of the tubing as you fit to get a perfect union. You can then rest assured you'll have a good fitting inner and outer diameters, and will weld up securely. Ok, this is essentially what I did tonight... on the first try. I just wasn't getting (and still kind of don't) how the OD is not important. I would think that attempt cutting to the ID, especially on the side of the acute angle, would be difficult and would create the unwanted situation that you describe. Cutting to the OD will at least leave material necessary to grind/file to fit... cutting to ID, not the case. Anyhow, this is being made too difficult. I've only offered this to eliminate the guesswork on these complex shapes. Use whatever method you prefer to get the correct angles, plug in your details and print. Transfer to your material and cut/grind/file to fit. -------- Mark Chouinard Wings, Center Section and Empannage and Fuse framed up - Working on Landing Gear Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385166#385166 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Brazed 4130
From: "taildrags" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 11, 2012
Gerry: please tell me that the Corben that was bent in the "violent crash" was not the one with the beautiful polished cooling eyebrows? Oh, Lord- I am glad that you are alright. Rum thing, losing an airplane, though... -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385167#385167 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 12, 2012
From: Jim Markle <jim_markle(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Tubing Coping
I'm here....and where WOULD I go???? :-) Just be aware of the ID and OD and their relationship then go to the shop and keep makin' stuff...... -----Original Message----- >From: K5YAC <hangar10(at)cox.net> >Sent: Oct 11, 2012 10:21 PM >To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Tubing Coping > > >Jim... where did you go? Am I missing something on the tubing coping? > >-------- >Mark Chouinard >Wings, Center Section and Empannage and Fuse framed up - Working on Landing Gear > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385156#385156 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 12, 2012
From: Michael Perez <speedbrake(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Wheels
If you guys have one wheel loose laced or finished to use as a template, tr y doing the other wheel yourself. I had zero wheel lacing experience and la ced one of my wheels myself. It is really quite simple and quite rewarding. - It is very easy to see if you got something in the wrong place. The spo kes have a specific length and bend to go in specific locations, so it beco mes obvious when you try to fit a spoke in a location it is not meant to be . (Crossed laced spokes intended for brakes. The straight laced, radial spo kes will all be the same.) After loosed laced, mount wheel on an axle, (I used my actual axle clamped to my table) and true using a dial indicator. Michael Perez =0APietenpol HINT Videos =0AKaretaker Aero =0Awww.karetakeraero.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wheels
From: "echobravo4" <eab4(at)comcast.net>
Date: Oct 12, 2012
I wouldn't say cross-laced wheels are just for use with brakes- it makes a much stronger wheel- radial laced wheels are not as strong in side loads. Probably more info than anyone needs- but this is an excellent book on the subject The Bicycle Wheel Jobst Brandt -------- Earl Brown I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I intended to be. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385180#385180 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Douwe Blumberg" <douweblumberg(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: UK incident
Date: Oct 12, 2012
Glad you're OK Gerry! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 12, 2012
From: Michael Perez <speedbrake(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Wheels
True, not just for brakes, but required with brakes. Michael Perez Pietenpol HINT Videos Karetaker Aero www.karetakeraero.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wheels
From: Amsafetyc <amsafetyc(at)aol.com>
Date: Oct 12, 2012
I learned a valuable lesson about spokes long ago. I had ventured an attempt to adjust the spokes on my motorcycle so I began the process of harmonic evaluation. Tapping the spokes for sound the same ting sound at each Every time I got a thud I tightened the spoke by the time I finished, I could wave at the wheel and it would wave back at me. I never knew a rim could become oblong, wavy and rub the frame and swing in so many places all at the same time. I had a friend come over and rescue me it took hours to correct what took minutes to screw up. From then on I swore off spokes and spoke adjustment. It's better to call uncle than to venture that far into the unknown. Uncle didn't have a clue on fixing it either. A lesson learned and a process respected to those who have the know how to keep a wheel round and true John Not gonna do it! Sent from my iPhone On Oct 11, 2012, at 9:43 PM, "echobravo4" wrote: > > John > I'll let you know when I'm ready to start > no the wheels and you can get ahold of > "That guy"! > > -------- > Earl Brown > > I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I intended to be. > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385152#385152 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Gerry Holland <gholland@content-stream.co.uk>
Subject: Re: UK incident
Date: Oct 12, 2012
Thanks Douwe! Back from Australia and some great flying there so have a renewed sense of wanting another project. Taking my A75 for shock loading check and looking a two possible projects next week. The Corben must RIP. A man needs an Aircraft, Dog and Woman in that order! Only joking ladies! Flew in a Rotec 3600 powered Spacewalker in Oz. Brilliant airplane! Regards Gerry ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: official fish scales
From: helspersew(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 12, 2012
Oscar, Let me know when you are ready. I'll have it here to send you for your test . I am only the caretaker of the Official- Piet- List- Industrial- Fish Sca le. It now belongs to the ages!! This is an incentive to carve another prop . I am the low man on the totem pole with my lousy 260 lbs! Dan Helsper Puryear, TN -----Original Message----- From: Oscar Zuniga <taildrags(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Thu, Oct 11, 2012 11:14 pm Subject: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales How does one go about getting on the circulation list for the Official Fish Scales? It seems that the Scales have so far been limited to use by prop carvers, but I would be interested in knowing how Scout fares with the A75 and wood prop. I also have a Prince prop for it and would be interested in a "fish head to fish head" comparison between the two if I had the scales available and could run one and then the other. I will not have Scout up here and ready for testing until November, but wou ld be happy to pay shipping over and back if the Official Scales are availa ble to non-carvers. Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 12, 2012
From: Michael Perez <speedbrake(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Wheels
It's true. Custom made SS rims are a little pricey!- So I went with unpol ished aluminum. The savings in weight and $$ made me feel better about it. Michael Perez =0APietenpol HINT Videos =0AKaretaker Aero =0Awww.karetakeraero.com =0A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Date: Oct 12, 2012
Subject: make sure your tailwheel steering springs are secure....
We lost a spring on our Champ tailwheel steering years ago and almost groun dlooped. Here's a scary result of losing a spring on landing. Make sure those things won't pop off. Even if they do you can still contro l directionally with prop blasts over the rudder. Mike C. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGOwcnGts4s&feature=related ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 12, 2012
From: Andre Abreu <andre_abreu_2000(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: official fish scales
Is there something special about this particular scale? Thanks Andy Abreu Toledo Ohio Pietenpol A65 N6186L --- On Fri, 10/12/12, helspersew(at)aol.com wrote: From: helspersew(at)aol.com <helspersew(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales Date: Friday, October 12, 2012, 11:22 AM =0AOscar,=0A=0A-=0A=0ALet me know when you are ready. I'll have it here t o send you for your test. I am only the caretaker of the Official- Piet- Li st- Industrial- Fish Scale. It now belongs to the ages!!-This is an incen tive to carve another prop. I am the low man on the totem pole with my lous y 260 lbs!=0A=0A-=0A=0ADan Helsper=0A=0APuryear, TN=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A---- -Original Message----- =0AFrom: Oscar Zuniga <taildrags(at)hotmail.com> =0ATo: Pietenpol List =0ASent: Thu, Oct 11, 2012 11:14 pm =0ASubject: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales =0A =0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A How does one go about getting on the circulation list-for the Official Fi sh Scales?- It seems that the Scales have so far been limited to use by p rop carvers, but I would be interested in knowing how Scout fares with the A75 and wood prop.- I also have a Prince prop for it and would be interes ted in a "fish-head to fish head" comparison between the two if I had the scales available and could run one and then the other. =0A- =0AI will not have Scout up here and ready for testing until November, but would be happy to pay shipping over and back if the Official Scales are ava ilable to non-carvers. =0A- =0AOscar Zuniga =0AMedford, OR =0AAir Camper NX41CC "Scout" =0AA75 power =0A =0A=0A=0A=0A=0A" target="_blank">http://www.matr onics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List=0Atp://forums.matronics.com=0A_blank">ht =================0A=0A ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: official fish scales
From: helspersew(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 12, 2012
No, other than it is a "controlled" fish scale, and the same one used by (s o far) three of us. So it conveys a certain amount of reliable information when it comes to a thrust measurement as compared to other Piets. :O) Dan Helsper Puryear, TN -----Original Message----- From: Andre Abreu <andre_abreu_2000(at)yahoo.com> Sent: Fri, Oct 12, 2012 12:13 pm Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales Is there something special about this particular scale? Thanks Andy Abreu Toledo Ohio Pietenpol A65 N6186L --- On Fri, 10/12/12, helspersew(at)aol.com wrote: From: helspersew(at)aol.com <helspersew(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales Date: Friday, October 12, 2012, 11:22 AM Oscar, Let me know when you are ready. I'll have it here to send you for your test . I am only the caretaker of the Official- Piet- List- Industrial- Fish Sca le. It now belongs to the ages!! This is an incentive to carve another prop . I am the low man on the totem pole with my lousy 260 lbs! Dan Helsper Puryear, TN -----Original Message----- From: Oscar Zuniga <taildrags(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Thu, Oct 11, 2012 11:14 pm Subject: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales How does one go about getting on the circulation list for the Official Fish Scales? It seems that the Scales have so far been limited to use by prop carvers, but I would be interested in knowing how Scout fares with the A75 and wood prop. I also have a Prince prop for it and would be interested in a "fish head to fish head" comparison between the two if I had the scales available and could run one and then the other. I will not have Scout up here and ready for testing until November, but wou ld be happy to pay shipping over and back if the Official Scales are availa ble to non-carvers. Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution http://www.matro=================== ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Gene Rambo <generambo(at)msn.com>
Subject: official fish scales
Date: Oct 12, 2012
Put me in line for the scale . . . I am ready to run the engine. Also=2C t o those of you running Model As=2C are you using pure water or some type of antifreeze?? It is starting to freeze here=2C so I am hesitant to fill it to run just to have to drain. Gene To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales From: helspersew(at)aol.com Date: Fri=2C 12 Oct 2012 14:54:10 -0400 No=2C other than it is a "controlled" fish scale=2C and the same one used b y (so far) three of us. So it conveys a certain amount of reliable informat ion when it comes to a thrust measurement as compared to other Piets. :O) Dan Helsper Puryear=2C TN -----Original Message----- From: Andre Abreu <andre_abreu_2000(at)yahoo.com> Sent: Fri=2C Oct 12=2C 2012 12:13 pm Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales Is there something special about this particular scale? Thanks Andy Abreu Toledo Ohio Pietenpol A65 N6186L --- On Fri=2C 10/12/12=2C helspersew(at)aol.com wrote: From: helspersew(at)aol.com <helspersew(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales Date: Friday=2C October 12=2C 2012=2C 11:22 AM Oscar=2C Let me know when you are ready. I'll have it here to send you for your test . I am only the caretaker of the Official- Piet- List- Industrial- Fish Sca le. It now belongs to the ages!! This is an incentive to carve another prop . I am the low man on the totem pole with my lousy 260 lbs! Dan Helsper Puryear=2C TN -----Original Message----- From: Oscar Zuniga <taildrags(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Thu=2C Oct 11=2C 2012 11:14 pm Subject: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales How does one go about getting on the circulation list for the Official Fish Scales? It seems that the Scales have so far been limited to use by prop carvers=2C but I would be interested in knowing how Scout fares with the A7 5 and wood prop. I also have a Prince prop for it and would be interested in a "fish head to fish head" comparison between the two if I had the scale s available and could run one and then the other. I will not have Scout up here and ready for testing until November=2C but w ould be happy to pay shipping over and back if the Official Scales are avai lable to non-carvers. Oscar Zuniga Medford=2C OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution http://www.matro=================== " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 12, 2012
Subject: Fwd: New to Pietenpol list
From: G <grantz5906(at)aol.com>
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: New to Pietenpol list From: G <grantz5906(at)aol.com> CC: Hello, all, I am Grant Ziebell and live in Savannah, TN. I had been considering building a Pietenpol for a while and have now taken the plunge. Plans are in hand, as is the Corvair conversion manual. I have been studying the plans and reviewing the archive contents of this invaluable list. Much to learn before the first sawdust flies. Is it worthwhile to purchase the "kits" from Aircraft Spruce or just develop my own wood needs list? I also read in the archives about McCormacks as a wood supplier. Is this a good way to go since I will not be able to actually go to their facility ans select the wood? Had the opportunity a few weeks ago to spend time with Randy Bush and Dan Helsper at the Beech River fly-in. Thanks, gentlemen, for the words of encouragement. I look forward to the building experience and would like to hear from 'horzpool' regarding his wider center section. Grant Ziebell Savannah, TN ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: official fish scales
From: helspersew(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 12, 2012
Per the advice of K. Perkins I run pure water. Its in a heated hangar for t he winter so I don't have to worry. As far as The Fish Scale goes, Gene sen d me your address off-list when you are ready. I expect to receive it back from Jeff Faith (along with some of his home-brewed beer) any day now :O) BTW how 'bout some photos? You're copying everything from others anyway, so there is no reason for secrecy. Dan Helsper Puryear, TN -----Original Message----- From: Gene Rambo <generambo(at)msn.com> Sent: Fri, Oct 12, 2012 5:04 pm Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales Put me in line for the scale . . . I am ready to run the engine. Also, to those of you running Model As, are you using pure water or some type of ant ifreeze?? It is starting to freeze here, so I am hesitant to fill it to ru n just to have to drain. Gene Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales From: helspersew(at)aol.com Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:54:10 -0400 No, other than it is a "controlled" fish scale, and the same one used by (s o far) three of us. So it conveys a certain amount of reliable information when it comes to a thrust measurement as compared to other Piets. :O) Dan Helsper Puryear, TN -----Original Message----- From: Andre Abreu <andre_abreu_2000(at)yahoo.com> Sent: Fri, Oct 12, 2012 12:13 pm Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales Is there something special about this particular scale? Thanks Andy Abreu Toledo Ohio Pietenpol A65 N6186L --- On Fri, 10/12/12, helspersew(at)aol.com wrote: From: helspersew(at)aol.com <helspersew(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales Date: Friday, October 12, 2012, 11:22 AM Oscar, Let me know when you are ready. I'll have it here to send you for your test . I am only the caretaker of the Official- Piet- List- Industrial- Fish Sca le. It now belongs to the ages!! This is an incentive to carve another prop . I am the low man on the totem pole with my lousy 260 lbs! Dan Helsper Puryear, TN -----Original Message----- From: Oscar Zuniga <taildrags(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Thu, Oct 11, 2012 11:14 pm Subject: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales How does one go about getting on the circulation list for the Official Fish Scales? It seems that the Scales have so far been limited to use by prop carvers, but I would be interested in knowing how Scout fares with the A75 and wood prop. I also have a Prince prop for it and would be interested in a "fish head to fish head" comparison between the two if I had the scales available and could run one and then the other. I will not have Scout up here and ready for testing until November, but wou ld be happy to pay shipping over and back if the Official Scales are availa ble to non-carvers. Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution http://www.matro=================== " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution st" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List http://forums.matronics.com ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Gene Rambo <generambo(at)msn.com>
Subject: official fish scales
Date: Oct 12, 2012
After seeing Douwe's and Gary's airplanes=2C I am ashamed to show photos . . . . I am painting the wing as we speak. Just in case anyone was wonderi ng=2C it takes 1 1/2 gallons of dope to make a complete wet cross coat on a 30 ft one piece wing (2X completely around wing=2C one side to side=2C one up and down). Just finished my 5th cross coat . . . . Wet sand tomorrow =2C silver on sunday To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales From: helspersew(at)aol.com Date: Fri=2C 12 Oct 2012 18:13:34 -0400 Per the advice of K. Perkins I run pure water. Its in a heated hangar for t he winter so I don't have to worry. As far as The Fish Scale goes=2C Gene s end me your address off-list when you are ready. I expect to receive it bac k from Jeff Faith (along with some of his home-brewed beer) any day now :O) BTW how 'bout some photos? You're copying everything from others anyway=2C so there is no reason for secrecy. Dan Helsper Puryear=2C TN -----Original Message----- From: Gene Rambo <generambo(at)msn.com> Sent: Fri=2C Oct 12=2C 2012 5:04 pm Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales Put me in line for the scale . . . I am ready to run the engine. Also=2C t o those of you running Model As=2C are you using pure water or some type of antifreeze?? It is starting to freeze here=2C so I am hesitant to fill it to run just to have to drain. Gene Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales From: helspersew(at)aol.com Date: Fri=2C 12 Oct 2012 14:54:10 -0400 No=2C other than it is a "controlled" fish scale=2C and the same one used b y (so far) three of us. So it conveys a certain amount of reliable informat ion when it comes to a thrust measurement as compared to other Piets. :O) Dan Helsper Puryear=2C TN -----Original Message----- From: Andre Abreu <andre_abreu_2000(at)yahoo.com> Sent: Fri=2C Oct 12=2C 2012 12:13 pm Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales Is there something special about this particular scale? Thanks Andy Abreu Toledo Ohio Pietenpol A65 N6186L --- On Fri=2C 10/12/12=2C helspersew(at)aol.com wrote: From: helspersew(at)aol.com <helspersew(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales Date: Friday=2C October 12=2C 2012=2C 11:22 AM Oscar=2C Let me know when you are ready. I'll have it here to send you for your test . I am only the caretaker of the Official- Piet- List- Industrial- Fish Sca le. It now belongs to the ages!! This is an incentive to carve another prop . I am the low man on the totem pole with my lousy 260 lbs! Dan Helsper Puryear=2C TN -----Original Message----- From: Oscar Zuniga <taildrags(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Thu=2C Oct 11=2C 2012 11:14 pm Subject: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales How does one go about getting on the circulation list for the Official Fish Scales? It seems that the Scales have so far been limited to use by prop carvers=2C but I would be interested in knowing how Scout fares with the A7 5 and wood prop. I also have a Prince prop for it and would be interested in a "fish head to fish head" comparison between the two if I had the scale s available and could run one and then the other. I will not have Scout up here and ready for testing until November=2C but w ould be happy to pay shipping over and back if the Official Scales are avai lable to non-carvers. Oscar Zuniga Medford=2C OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution http://www.matro=================== " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution st" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List http://forums.matronics.com ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 12, 2012
From: Dave Millikan <n11dmx(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: New to Pietenpol list
Welcome,..I am 2 yrs into a pete.wings and tail are built, fuse 10 %. Steel fuse, have made many changes, moved wing aft based on William Wynes c g- measurements at Brodhead 2010 and 2011. 3 ft ctr- section bbig aq$$ wheels from airdromes and aeroplanes in Misso uri. Dave-- N11DMX(at)yahoo.com --- On Fri, 10/12/12, G wrote: From: G <grantz5906(at)aol.com> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Fwd: New to Pietenpol list Date: Friday, October 12, 2012, 10:05 PM -------- Original Message -------- Subject: New to Pietenpol list From: G <grantz5906(at)aol.com> CC: Hello, all, I am Grant Ziebell and live in Savannah, TN.- I had been considering buil ding a Pietenpol for a while and have now taken the plunge.- Plans are in hand,- as is the Corvair conversion manual. I have been studying the plans and reviewing the archive contents of this i nvaluable list.- Much to learn before the first sawdust flies. Is it worthwhile to purchase the "kits" from Aircraft Spruce or just develo p my own wood needs list? I also read in the archives about McCormacks as a wood supplier.- Is this a good way to go since I will not be able to actually go to their facility ans select the wood? Had the opportunity a few weeks ago to spend time with Randy Bush and Dan H elsper at the Beech River fly-in.- Thanks, gentlemen, for the- words of encouragement. I look forward to the building experience and would like to hear from 'horz pool' regarding- his wider center section.- Grant Ziebell Savannah, TN le, List Admin. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dick N" <horzpool(at)goldengate.net>
Subject: Re: Fwd: New to Pietenpol list
Date: Oct 12, 2012
Hey Grant Are you a member of the Brodhead Pietenpol Assn.? If so go to Page 15, there is an ad for wood from Bill Rewey, it looks like a great deal at $750 for Brodhead Pietenpol assnnough wood to build a Piet. Bills ph# is 608-833-5839. He lives near Madison, Wi. If you arent a member you should join, send a $20 check to Brodhead Pietenpol Assn Box 3501 Oshkosh, Wi. 54903 Dick N. ----- Original Message ----- From: "G" <grantz5906(at)aol.com> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 5:05 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Fwd: New to Pietenpol list -------- Original Message -------- Subject: New to Pietenpol list From: G <grantz5906(at)aol.com> CC: Hello, all, I am Grant Ziebell and live in Savannah, TN. I had been considering building a Pietenpol for a while and have now taken the plunge. Plans are in hand, as is the Corvair conversion manual. I have been studying the plans and reviewing the archive contents of this invaluable list. Much to learn before the first sawdust flies. Is it worthwhile to purchase the "kits" from Aircraft Spruce or just develop my own wood needs list? I also read in the archives about McCormacks as a wood supplier. Is this a good way to go since I will not be able to actually go to their facility ans select the wood? Had the opportunity a few weeks ago to spend time with Randy Bush and Dan Helsper at the Beech River fly-in. Thanks, gentlemen, for the words of encouragement. I look forward to the building experience and would like to hear from 'horzpool' regarding his wider center section. Grant Ziebell Savannah, TN ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Fwd: New to Pietenpol list
Date: Oct 12, 2012
Welcome, Grant!! I cannot comment on buying wood kits, as I purchased all mine (Poplar) from a local wood supplier. I can say, though, that if you spent time with Randy and Dan and still want to be involved in the Pietenpol community you will do great! ;-) Gary Boothe NX308MB -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of G Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 3:05 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Fwd: New to Pietenpol list -------- Original Message -------- Subject: New to Pietenpol list From: G <grantz5906(at)aol.com> CC: Hello, all, I am Grant Ziebell and live in Savannah, TN. I had been considering building a Pietenpol for a while and have now taken the plunge. Plans are in hand, as is the Corvair conversion manual. I have been studying the plans and reviewing the archive contents of this invaluable list. Much to learn before the first sawdust flies. Is it worthwhile to purchase the "kits" from Aircraft Spruce or just develop my own wood needs list? I also read in the archives about McCormacks as a wood supplier. Is this a good way to go since I will not be able to actually go to their facility ans select the wood? Had the opportunity a few weeks ago to spend time with Randy Bush and Dan Helsper at the Beech River fly-in. Thanks, gentlemen, for the words of encouragement. I look forward to the building experience and would like to hear from 'horzpool' regarding his wider center section. Grant Ziebell Savannah, TN ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5(at)comcast.net>
Subject: official fish scales
Date: Oct 12, 2012
I smell a rat! Dan - make him show the pictures! Gary Boothe NX308MB From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Gene Rambo Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 3:30 PM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales After seeing Douwe's and Gary's airplanes, I am ashamed to show photos . . . . I am painting the wing as we speak. Just in case anyone was wondering, it takes 1 1/2 gallons of dope to make a complete wet cross coat on a 30 ft one piece wing (2X completely around wing, one side to side, one up and down). Just finished my 5th cross coat . . . . Wet sand tomorrow, silver on sunday _____ Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales From: helspersew(at)aol.com Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 18:13:34 -0400 Per the advice of K. Perkins I run pure water. Its in a heated hangar for the winter so I don't have to worry. As far as The Fish Scale goes, Gene send me your address off-list when you are ready. I expect to receive it back from Jeff Faith (along with some of his home-brewed beer) any day now :O) BTW how 'bout some photos? You're copying everything from others anyway, so there is no reason for secrecy. Dan Helsper Puryear, TN -----Original Message----- From: Gene Rambo <generambo(at)msn.com> Sent: Fri, Oct 12, 2012 5:04 pm Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales Put me in line for the scale . . . I am ready to run the engine. Also, to those of you running Model As, are you using pure water or some type of antifreeze?? It is starting to freeze here, so I am hesitant to fill it to run just to have to drain. Gene _____ Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales From: helspersew(at)aol.com Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:54:10 -0400 No, other than it is a "controlled" fish scale, and the same one used by (so far) three of us. So it conveys a certain amount of reliable information when it comes to a thrust measurement as compared to other Piets. :O) Dan Helsper Puryear, TN -----Original Message----- From: Andre Abreu <andre_abreu_2000(at)yahoo.com> Sent: Fri, Oct 12, 2012 12:13 pm Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales Is there something special about this particular scale? Thanks Andy Abreu Toledo Ohio Pietenpol A65 N6186L --- On Fri, 10/12/12, helspersew(at)aol.com wrote: From: helspersew(at)aol.com <helspersew(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales Date: Friday, October 12, 2012, 11:22 AM Oscar, Let me know when you are ready. I'll have it here to send you for your test. I am only the caretaker of the Official- Piet- List- Industrial- Fish Scale. It now belongs to the ages!! This is an incentive to carve another prop. I am the low man on the totem pole with my lousy 260 lbs! Dan Helsper Puryear, TN -----Original Message----- From: Oscar Zuniga <taildrags(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Thu, Oct 11, 2012 11:14 pm Subject: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales How does one go about getting on the circulation list for the Official Fish Scales? It seems that the Scales have so far been limited to use by prop carvers, but I would be interested in knowing how Scout fares with the A75 and wood prop. I also have a Prince prop for it and would be interested in a "fish head to fish head" comparison between the two if I had the scales available and could run one and then the other. I will not have Scout up here and ready for testing until November, but would be happy to pay shipping over and back if the Official Scales are available to non-carvers. Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution http://www.matro=================== " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution st" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List http://forums.matronics.com ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution st" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List http://forums.matronics.com ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dick N" <horzpool(at)goldengate.net>
Subject: Re: Fwd: New to Pietenpol list
Date: Oct 12, 2012
Hi again Grant Sorry , I didnt read your whole sending off the last post. The 2" wider fuse I belive is some what un-necessary. I know some will disagree with that so sit in one first and see how you feel after that. Best luck to you. Dick N. ----- Original Message ----- From: "G" <grantz5906(at)aol.com> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 5:05 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Fwd: New to Pietenpol list -------- Original Message -------- Subject: New to Pietenpol list From: G <grantz5906(at)aol.com> CC: Hello, all, I am Grant Ziebell and live in Savannah, TN. I had been considering building a Pietenpol for a while and have now taken the plunge. Plans are in hand, as is the Corvair conversion manual. I have been studying the plans and reviewing the archive contents of this invaluable list. Much to learn before the first sawdust flies. Is it worthwhile to purchase the "kits" from Aircraft Spruce or just develop my own wood needs list? I also read in the archives about McCormacks as a wood supplier. Is this a good way to go since I will not be able to actually go to their facility ans select the wood? Had the opportunity a few weeks ago to spend time with Randy Bush and Dan Helsper at the Beech River fly-in. Thanks, gentlemen, for the words of encouragement. I look forward to the building experience and would like to hear from 'horzpool' regarding his wider center section. Grant Ziebell Savannah, TN ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Fuselage
From: "biplan53" <biplan53(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 12, 2012
Well after much hesitation,trying to plan ahead,cutting and fitting I have both sides of a steel fuselage hanging on the wall. I added a door on the left side and 6 inches to the front. You guys bear with me I am trying to get a good work schedule going. -------- Building steel fuselage aircamper. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385229#385229 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: make sure your tailwheel steering springs are secure....
From: "biplan53" <biplan53(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 12, 2012
In 1996 a good friend and I flew his Arctic Tern to Oshkosh When I was tying the tail down I found the tail spring at top of the hole about to come loose. I almost fainted,Kip had just got finished rebuilding the plane from a so called friends bad landing. I had landed the plane at Oshkosh and Kip would have blown a gasket if I had ground looped and bent the plane.[/b] -------- Building steel fuselage aircamper. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385230#385230 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: make sure your tailwheel steering springs are secure....
From: "biplan53" <biplan53(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 12, 2012
In 1996 a good friend and I flew his Arctic Tern to Oshkosh When I was tying the tail down I found the tail spring at top of the hole about to come loose. I almost fainted,Kip had just got finished rebuilding the plane from a so called friends bad landing. I had landed the plane at Oshkosh and Kip would have blown a gasket if I had ground looped and bent the plane.[/b] -------- Building steel fuselage aircamper. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385231#385231 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Douwe Blumberg" <douweblumberg(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: radiator fluid
Date: Oct 13, 2012
Hey Gene, I had to keep at least a 50/50 mix in my Ford during the winters. I once cracked a block on a auto engine conversion project I had sitting in my studio and it was a real bummer! Don't risk it! Douwe ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 13, 2012
From: Jim Boyer <boyerjrb(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: make sure your tailwheel steering springs are
secure.... Hi Jerry, The gull wing Stinson is one=C2- of the most beautiful airplanes ever I t hink. A local dentist in Redfield SD had one and I always loved seeing it. Never had a ride in one unfortunately but maybe someday! Thanks for the picture. Jim B. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Donald Lane" <dslane(at)embarqmail.com>
Subject: official fish scales
Date: Oct 13, 2012
Am using water with water pump lube added, Zerex product from NAPA, per Ken Perkins. I drain it when needed to protect from freezing. I would also like to get in line for the official fish scales. I am running a home carved propeller, copied from another, origin unknown. I am interested to see how it compares. Don Lane Minnesott Beach NC ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: radiator fluid
From: "BYD" <billsayre(at)ymail.com>
Date: Oct 13, 2012
In seeking answers about the Model-A I look to those who went before me and those with experience. Those with experience would be the model-A clubs and their presence is abundant on the web. Some of those who went before me are on this list, some are not. Both camps advocate a 50/50 mix of antifreeze and water during the winter so thats set. During the summer, some advocate pure water (distilled) and some the addition of WaterWetter to that distilled water. The question is do you want the best, or whats adequate? Depending on your flying and location, a 50/50 mix could work year round. I fly in a low altitude and cool environment so Ill start by using the 50/50 mix and if my temps stay where I want them, Ill use it year round if I lived in Colorado or the deep south I might need to run a different seasonal mix. I like the KISS methodology and like to use products that can be found easily from multiple sources particularly if I plan on cross-country travel so I often ask myself, could I find this at a country store. Water alone can be had anywhere. Anti-freeze, just about. Redline WaterWetter, not so much. Read http://www.rockymountainmodelaclub.org/Cooling_System_Fluids_v2007.pdf for a dissertation about cooling fluids for the Model-A and search other Model-A websites. Another area for study will be engine oil. Ive found that newer oils are not best for the Model-A due to lack of zinc (an anti-pollution move). If you use oil with higher rating than SAE SF then adding ZDDPLUS will restore it to the SF levels. Using plain 30wt HD oil will prevent you from having to add an additive and can be found in automotive, hardware and even some grocery stores (so it may pass my country store test). Half the fun of running these old time engines is learning the folklore that goes with them, but be wary of falling into the trap of needing the absolute best or scientifically the best. The most eloquent solutions are dirt simple and readily available. Ill run a 50/50 mix and watch my temps. If I find myself in the southwest desert in a heat spell running high temps, I may drain it out and replace it with pure water knowing Ill find antifreeze by winter. Best of luck and enjoy the ride! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385253#385253 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Gene Rambo <generambo(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: radiator fluid
Date: Oct 13, 2012
the 50/50 mix may well work for cars=2C but you might find yourself lifting paint off of your aircraft or poisoning yourself or both as the aircraft a pplication does leak from time to time. I think I'll stick with water and drain it after running. Gene > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: radiator fluid > From: billsayre(at)ymail.com > Date: Sat=2C 13 Oct 2012 12:42:35 -0700 > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > > > In seeking answers about the Model-A I look to those who went before me a nd those with experience. Those with experience would be the model-A clubs and their presence is abundant on the web. Some of those who went before me are on this list=2C some are not. Both camps advocate a 50/50 mix of an tifreeze and water during the winter so that=99s set. During the sum mer=2C some advocate pure water (distilled) and some the addition of WaterW etter to that distilled water. The question is do you want the best=2C or what=99s adequate? > > Depending on your flying and location=2C a 50/50 mix could work year roun d. I fly in a low altitude and cool environment so I=99ll start by u sing the 50/50 mix and if my temps stay where I want them=2C I=99ll u se it year round =93 if I lived in Colorado or the deep south I might need to run a different seasonal mix. I like the KISS methodology and lik e to use products that can be found easily from multiple sources particular ly if I plan on cross-country travel so I often ask myself=2C could I find this at a country store. Water alone can be had anywhere. Anti-freeze=2C just about. Redline WaterWetter=2C not so much. > > Read http://www.rockymountainmodelaclub.org/Cooling_System_Fluids_v2007.p df for a dissertation about cooling fluids for the Model-A and search other Model-A websites. > > Another area for study will be engine oil. I=99ve found that newer oils are not best for the Model-A due to lack of zinc (an anti-pollution m ove). If you use oil with higher rating than SAE SF then adding ZDDPLUS wi ll restore it to the SF levels. Using plain 30wt HD oil will prevent you f rom having to add an additive and can be found in automotive=2C hardware an d even some grocery stores (so it may pass my country store test). > > Half the fun of running these old time engines is learning the folklore t hat goes with them=2C but be wary of falling into the trap of needing the a bsolute best or scientifically the best. The most eloquent solutions are d irt simple and readily available. > > I=99ll run a 50/50 mix and watch my temps. If I find myself in the southwest desert in a heat spell running high temps=2C I may drain it out and replace it with pure water knowing I=99ll find antifreeze by wint er. > > Best of luck and enjoy the ride! > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385253#385253 > > > > > > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: radiator fluid
From: "BYD" <billsayre(at)ymail.com>
Date: Oct 13, 2012
I did have leaks on the first run especially - loose clamps that hadn't set in with the heat et cetera, but I didn't lose any paint (Latex) and I only have an occasional facial twitch so far. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385257#385257 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 13, 2012
From: airlion <airlion(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: radiator fluid
I have to reply to this one tho I am not a rariator man except in my car. A few years ago I picked up a piece of metal and sliced my fuel tank abt 4 inches. pouring out fuel I made it to a RV repair shop 2 miles away. They could not fix it but suggested I rub a bar of soap on the crack which I did and drove the car for a month before replacing the tank. I t did not leak. Another suggestion was if you had a radiator leak you should pour a cup of EGG white in and it would seal it. HAVE NOT HAD TO USE THAT ONE. cHEERS, Gardiner Mason ----- Original Message ---- From: BYD <billsayre(at)ymail.com> Sent: Sat, October 13, 2012 3:43:27 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: radiator fluid In seeking answers about the Model-A I look to those who went before me and those with experience. Those with experience would be the model-A clubs and their presence is abundant on the web. Some of those who went before me are on this list, some are not. Both camps advocate a 50/50 mix of antifreeze and water during the winter so thats set. During the summer, some advocate pure water (distilled) and some the addition of WaterWetter to that distilled water. The question is do you want the best, or whats adequate? Depending on your flying and location, a 50/50 mix could work year round. I fly in a low altitude and cool environment so Ill start by using the 50/50 mix and if my temps stay where I want them, Ill use it year round if I lived in Colorado or the deep south I might need to run a different seasonal mix. I like the KISS methodology and like to use products that can be found easily from multiple sources particularly if I plan on cross-country travel so I often ask myself, could I find this at a country store. Water alone can be had anywhere. Anti-freeze, just about. Redline WaterWetter, not so much. Read http://www.rockymountainmodelaclub.org/Cooling_System_Fluids_v2007.pdf for a dissertation about cooling fluids for the Model-A and search other Model-A websites. Another area for study will be engine oil. Ive found that newer oils are not best for the Model-A due to lack of zinc (an anti-pollution move). If you use oil with higher rating than SAE SF then adding ZDDPLUS will restore it to the SF levels. Using plain 30wt HD oil will prevent you from having to add an additive and can be found in automotive, hardware and even some grocery stores (so it may pass my country store test). Half the fun of running these old time engines is learning the folklore that goes with them, but be wary of falling into the trap of needing the absolute best or scientifically the best. The most eloquent solutions are dirt simple and readily available. Ill run a 50/50 mix and watch my temps. If I find myself in the southwest desert in a heat spell running high temps, I may drain it out and replace it with pure water knowing Ill find antifreeze by winter. Best of luck and enjoy the ride! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385253#385253 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Tubing Coping
From: "K5YAC" <hangar10(at)cox.net>
Date: Oct 13, 2012
Soooo... I'm reading through the notes page for the Tube Coping Calculator I posted at the beginning of this thread... you know how it goes... open package, play with new tool and THEN read instructions. Anyhow... it clearly states right in the notes that, "specifying the tube's wall thickness makes the cut fit to the inside diameter of the tube, which makes it easier to fit, and makes a nice notch for welding." Perhaps THIS is the reason I had good success with my first attempt? LOL! I still visualize a nicely contoured notch with flush fitting edges that are tapered to the mating tube, which would mean that the ID and OD would be considered, but I can see where in my current application (landing gear), where heavy walled tube is going to be welded, the ID and notched edge is preferred. -------- Mark Chouinard Wings, Center Section and Empannage and Fuse framed up - Working on Landing Gear Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385261#385261 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Ruse" <steve(at)wotelectronics.com>
Subject: Re: make sure your tailwheel steering springs are secure....
Date: Oct 13, 2012
Good reminder Mike. After losing a tailwheel spring on my GN-1 the day I bought it, I thought it was a good idea to secure the springs. Now I keep them safety wired where the spring can't just pop off when there is no tension. I haven't had one come loose in ~8 years. Steve Ruse Norman, OK From: Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 11:39 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: make sure your tailwheel steering springs are secure.... We lost a spring on our Champ tailwheel steering years ago and almost groundlooped. Here's a scary result of losing a spring on landing. Make sure those things won't pop off. Even if they do you can still control directionally with prop blasts over the rudder. Mike C. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGOwcnGts4s&feature=related ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Clif Dawson" <cdawson5854(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: radiator fluid
Date: Oct 13, 2012
I've used pepper many times in car and truck rads. Strange how these things happen after your vehicle travels a few hundred thousand miles. :-) Another trick is to use your lady's nylons to replace a broken fan belt. I wonder if Waldo ever had occasion to use that one on his Hisso. Clif The Early Bird may get the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese. > I have to reply to this one tho I am not a rariator man except in my car.. > Another suggestion was > if you had a radiator leak you should pour a cup of EGG white in and it > would > seal it. HAVE NOT HAD TO USE THAT ONE. > cHEERS, Gardiner Mason ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: official fish scales
From: helspersew(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 14, 2012
Hi Don, There is no official "line" for the Official Pietenpol-List Fish Scale. Who ever wants it gets it. IF you are ready just send me a note off-line, and i t will be on it's way to you. Dan Helsper Puryear, TN -----Original Message----- From: Donald Lane <dslane(at)embarqmail.com> Sent: Sat, Oct 13, 2012 8:00 am Subject: Pietenpol-List: official fish scales Am using water with water pump lube added, Zerex product from NAPA, per Ken Perkins. I drain it when needed to protect from freezing. I would also like to get in line for the official fish scales. I am runnin g a home carved propeller, copied from another, origin unknown. I am inter ested to see how it compares. Don Lane Minnesott Beach NC ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Firewall Bracing
From: Jack <jack(at)textors.com>
Date: Oct 14, 2012
Trying to figure the support for my nose tank. The plans call for a piece of ash 11/2 x 11/4 placed horizontally between the top longerons. Can anyone assist with comments or pictures showing their application? Thanks! Sent from my iPad Jack Textor ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 14, 2012
From: Andre Abreu <andre_abreu_2000(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: make sure your tailwheel steering springs are secure....
http://tinyurl.com/9hqk4ct Our spring is preloaded with a cable and nicopress.=C2- see picture. Andy N6186L --- On Sun, 10/14/12, Steve Ruse wrote: From: Steve Ruse <steve(at)wotelectronics.com> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: make sure your tailwheel steering springs are secure.... Date: Sunday, October 14, 2012, 12:51 AM =0A=0A =0A =0A=0A=0A=0AGood reminder Mike.=0A=C2-=0AAfter losing a tailwh eel spring on my GN-1 the day =0AI bought it, I thought it was a good idea to secure the springs.=C2- Now I =0Akeep them safety wired where the spri ng can't just pop off when there is no =0Atension.=C2- I haven't had one come loose in ~8 years.=0A=C2-=0ASteve Ruse=0ANorman, OK=0A=0A =0A=0AFrom: Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage =0APartners, LLC] =0ASent: F riday, October 12, 2012 11:39 AM=0ATo: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com =0A=0AS ubject: Pietenpol-List: make sure your tailwheel steering springs =0Aare se cure....=0A =0A=0AWe lost a =0Aspring on our Champ tailwheel steering years ago and alm ost =0Agroundlooped. =0AHere=99s a =0Ascary result of losing a spring on landing. =0A =C2- =0AMake sure =0Athose things won=99t pop off .=C2- Even if they do you can still control =0Adirectionally =0Awith prop =0Ablasts over the rudder. =0A =C2- =0AMike =0AC. =0A =C2- =0Ahttp:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGOwcnGts4s&feature=related =0A =C2- =0A =C2 - =0A =C2-=0A=0Ahref="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Li st">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List=0Ahref="http://foru ms.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com=0Ahref="http://www.matronic ===============0A=0A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dortch, Steven D MAJ MIL USA NGB" <steven.d.dortch(at)us.army.mil>
Date: Oct 14, 2012
Subject: Re: make sure your tailwheel steering springs are secure....
The first thing told to me by two tail wheel gurus during my tailwheel checkout was "During pre-flight look at the tail wheel springs. Make sure they are preloaded with no slack." then both related accidents or near accidents due to loose/broken tail wheel springs. First make sure you know what you are looking for. As a student pilot I was taught to look the engine over. I had no idea what I was looking at. But I looked. During my first Owner hindered annual (Cessna 150) I learned a great deal about what to look for. Blue Skies, Steve D ----- Original Message ----- From: Andre Abreu <andre_abreu_2000(at)yahoo.com> Date: Sunday, October 14, 2012 10:45 Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: make sure your tailwheel steering springs are secure.... > http://tinyurl.com/9hqk4ct > > Our spring is preloaded with a cable and nicopress. see picture. > > Andy > N6186L > > --- On Sun, 10/14/12, Steve Ruse < wrote: > > From: Steve Ruse < > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: make sure your tailwheel steering springs are secure.... > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Sunday, October 14, 2012, 12:51 AM > > > > > > > > > Good reminder Mike. > > After losing a tailwheel spring on my GN-1 the day > I bought it, I thought it was a good idea to secure the springs. Now I > keep them safety wired where the spring can't just pop off when there is no > tension. I haven't had one come loose in ~8 years. > > Steve Ruse > Norman, OK > > > > > From: Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage > Partners, LLC] > Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 11:39 AM > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > > Subject: Pietenpol-List: make sure your tailwheel steering springs > are secure.... > > > > We lost a > spring on our Champ tailwheel steering years ago and almost > groundlooped. > Heres a > scary result of losing a spring on landing. > > Make sure > those things wont pop off. Even if they do you can still control > directionally > with prop > blasts over the rudder. > > Mike > C. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGOwcnGts4s&feature=related > > > > > href="blockedhttp://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List > href="blockedhttp://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com > href="blockedhttp://www.matronic============= > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 14, 2012
From: Michael Perez <speedbrake(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: make sure your tailwheel steering springs are secure....
One safety measure you guys might want to consider, especially if you do no t have differential brakes, is to install a type of "jumper" cable that wil l attach to the cables where the spring is attached. This cable can share t he same thimbles as the springs at both ends. Think of it-like safety cha ins on a truck pulling a trailer. Attach the jumper on one cable end, leave enough slack for the spring to work and attach the other end on the other cable. If the spring separates, the jumper will keep the cables connected a nd provide limited control. Michael Perez Pietenpol HINT Videos Karetaker Aero www.karetakeraero.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 14, 2012
From: Michael Perez <speedbrake(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Firewall Bracing
Jack, the attached pictures demonstrate what I did. I knew how I wanted the tank mounted prior to building the fuselage, so I positioned the white ash cross piece as I needed it. I believe it is 3/4" X 2". - I designed and fabricated the fuel tank to fit.- The tank sits on the ins trument shelf and the ash.- It will be held in place with a strap and sid e to side movement will be restricted by some rubber inserts between the ta nk sides and fuselage. - I have a write up on it in a previous newsletter. Michael Perez Pietenpol HINT Videos Karetaker Aero www.karetakeraero.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 14, 2012
From: Michael Perez <speedbrake(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Fwd: New to Pietenpol list
Hello Grant. Welcome to the Pitenpol list. - This past July marked my fourth year building my plane. I believe it will b e flight ready by end of next summer. - I opted to buy all my sitka and plywood in bulk and machine my own pieces. - My wood came from McCormick's and Public Lumber.- (On internet)- I have the tools to do this and loved the work involved. - Not for everyone, but a good option. - I hope I may be of assistance to you in the future. Michael Perez Pietenpol HINT Videos Karetaker Aero www.karetakeraero.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Todd Pryby" <tpryby(at)cox.net>
Subject: New Pietenpol Builder
Date: Oct 14, 2012
I have finally purchased my builder plans for the Pietenpol Air Camper and wonder if anyone has modified the plans to increase the useable payload. I weight 250 and would like to carry a passenger and fuel. Todd Pryby ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: make sure your tailwheel steering springs are secure....
From: "biplan53" <biplan53(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 14, 2012
My friend Kip Yearwood in Sanger, Texas has a Gullwing that he is restoring. Before he dismantled it he let me fly it from Texarkana to Justine,Texas one time,and it is one big sweet flying airplane. Once trimmed out it is surprising how light the controls are considering how big the plane is. Only thing is, it is a costly plane to fly. With the 300 horsepower lycoming engine you better bring plenty oil with you.[/b] -------- Building steel fuselage aircamper. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385333#385333 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 15, 2012
Subject: Re: radiator fluid
From: Greg Bacon <gbacon67(at)gmail.com>
I've been working in commercial and industrial water treatment for 15 years, so I feel compelled to share my two cents here. Distilled water is corrosive, especially with respect to steel. I don't recommend using distilled water unless you add a corrosion inhibitor. Name brand automotive coolants have pH buffers and corrosion inhibitors that do a good job preventing corrosion. Typically, a 50/50 glycol mix only reduces heat transfer by approximately 10%. Not a big deal. Greg Bacon On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 2:42 PM, BYD wrote: > > In seeking answers about the Model-A I look to those who went before me > and those with experience. Those with experience would be the model-A > clubs and their presence is abundant on the web. Some of those who went > before me are on this list, some are not. Both camps advocate a 50/50 mi x > of antifreeze and water during the winter so that=92s set. During the > summer, some advocate pure water (distilled) and some the addition of > WaterWetter to that distilled water. The question is do you want the bes t, > or what=92s adequate? > > Depending on your flying and location, a 50/50 mix could work year round. > I fly in a low altitude and cool environment so I=92ll start by using th e > 50/50 mix and if my temps stay where I want them, I=92ll use it year roun d ' > if I lived in Colorado or the deep south I might need to run a different > seasonal mix. I like the KISS methodology and like to use products that > can be found easily from multiple sources particularly if I plan on > cross-country travel so I often ask myself, could I find this at a countr y > store. Water alone can be had anywhere. Anti-freeze, just about. Redli ne > WaterWetter, not so much. > > Read > http://www.rockymountainmodelaclub.org/Cooling_System_Fluids_v2007.pdffor a dissertation about cooling fluids for the Model-A and search other > Model-A websites. > > Another area for study will be engine oil. I=92ve found that newer oils are > not best for the Model-A due to lack of zinc (an anti-pollution move). I f > you use oil with higher rating than SAE SF then adding ZDDPLUS will resto re > it to the SF levels. Using plain 30wt HD oil will prevent you from havin g > to add an additive and can be found in automotive, hardware and even some > grocery stores (so it may pass my country store test). > > Half the fun of running these old time engines is learning the folklore > that goes with them, but be wary of falling into the trap of needing the > absolute best or scientifically the best. The most eloquent solutions ar e > dirt simple and readily available. > > I=92ll run a 50/50 mix and watch my temps. If I find myself in the > southwest desert in a heat spell running high temps, I may drain it out a nd > replace it with pure water knowing I=92ll find antifreeze by winter. > > Best of luck and enjoy the ride! > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385253#385253 > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > -- Greg Bacon ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Date: Oct 15, 2012
Subject: nose fuel tank supports
Jack-I've got a few sketches of how I supported my nose fuel tank that Chri s Tracy was kind enough to post here of possible interest: http://www.westcoastpiet.com/images/Mike%20C uy%20A-65%20Piet/mike_cuy_3.htm Mike C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ralph" <ralphhsd(at)itctel.com>
Subject: "fish scale"
Date: Oct 15, 2012
I have been following the posts concerning the official =9Cfish scale=9D for measuring prop performance. Here in the Midwest a hardware store called =9CMAC=99S=9D has a =9Cbig game scale=9D with a 440 pound capacity. I haven=99t seen it yet but for the sale price of $12.99 I am going to check it out. The price is probably less than two shipping charges to use the =9COFFICIAL FISH SCALE=9D. Ralph in South Dakota ________________________________________________________________________________
From: TOM MICHELLE BRANT <tmbrant(at)msn.com>
Subject: which Bingelis book
Date: Oct 15, 2012
I'm ordering one of the construction technique books by Bingelis but I see there are two which don't seem to be terribly different... Construction Te chniques and then there is Sport Plane Builder. Which one is preferred for the subject matters I'll need working on the Piet. Maybe it's best to buy both?? Tom B. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 15, 2012
Subject: Re: which Bingelis book
From: Ryan Mueller <ryan(at)rmueller.org>
This is what you should buy: http://www.shopeaa.com/bingelissetof4.aspx On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:28 AM, TOM MICHELLE BRANT wrote: > I'm ordering one of the construction technique books by Bingelis but I > see there are two which don't seem to be terribly different... > Construction Techniques and then there is Sport Plane Builder. Which one > is preferred for the subject matters I'll need working on the Piet. Maybe > it's best to buy both?? > > Tom B. > > * > > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: which Bingelis book
From: "K5YAC" <hangar10(at)cox.net>
Date: Oct 15, 2012
I would recommend both, Tom... the two you mention are similar, but there are notable differences. -------- Mark Chouinard Wings, Center Section and Empannage and Fuse framed up - Working on Landing Gear Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385374#385374 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 15, 2012
From: Michael Perez <speedbrake(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: which Bingelis book
Buy both because they do cover different subjects some and even the same subjects are show with different diagrams, photos and explanations. Michael Perez Pietenpol HINT Videos Karetaker Aero www.karetakeraero.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 15, 2012
Subject: Re: which Bingelis book
From: Ken Bickers <bickers.ken(at)gmail.com>
I'll second Mark and Ryan. While the topics are similar, I don't think there is any specific content shared across the Bingelis books. Ken On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:19 AM, K5YAC wrote: > > I would recommend both, Tom... the two you mention are similar, but there are notable differences. > > -------- > Mark Chouinard > Wings, Center Section and Empannage and Fuse framed up - Working on Landing Gear > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385374#385374 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Piet fuse and tail feathers on craigslist
From: "gabenner" <gbenner(at)bixbymachine.com>
Date: Oct 15, 2012
Hello, Search for craigslist spokane and then aircraft. Take care! Gary Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385404#385404 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: New Pietenpol Builder
From: "jarheadpilot82" <jarheadpilot82(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 16, 2012
How big a passenger? Are you sure the Pietenpol is for you? Build it light, and keep your passengers small. To modify the airplane is to be your own aircraft designer. Just my $.02 -------- Semper Fi, Terry Hand Athens, GA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385434#385434 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: New Pietenpol Builder
From: "tools" <n0kkj(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Oct 16, 2012
There's some small changes that are common enough that they are well vetted and you're not really just starting over... such as... A little more room between the wing and fuse. A little wider. The long fuse version and of course some more horse power. However, if you want something that's a little roomier and can routinely carry passengers along, you might seriously consider a larger plane. A Bakeng Deuce is a 2 hole open cockpit parasol for example. If you just really really like the lines of a Piet, I'd consider the Bakeng and changing the shape of tail feathers, cowling, etc rather than changing the Piet too much. This from someone who picked a Piet so he wouldn't have to do ANY designing himself! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385469#385469 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Barry Davis" <bed(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: which Bingelis book
Date: Oct 16, 2012
Unless you are an experienced builder, then I would buy all 4. If you are an experienced builder, then I would buy all 4. Barry D From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of TOM MICHELLE BRANT Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 12:29 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: which Bingelis book I'm ordering one of the construction technique books by Bingelis but I see there are two which don't seem to be terribly different... Construction Techniques and then there is Sport Plane Builder. Which one is preferred for the subject matters I'll need working on the Piet. Maybe it's best to buy both?? Tom B. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ellery voge <elleryvoge(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: New Pietenpol Builder
Date: Oct 16, 2012
Has anyone tried reducing the wing span? Curious to know. > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: New Pietenpol Builder > From: n0kkj(at)yahoo.com > Date: Tue=2C 16 Oct 2012 09:47:00 -0700 > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > > > There's some small changes that are common enough that they are well vett ed and you're not really just starting over... such as... > > A little more room between the wing and fuse. A little wider. The long fuse version and of course some more horse power. > > However=2C if you want something that's a little roomier and can routinel y carry passengers along=2C you might seriously consider a larger plane. A Bakeng Deuce is a 2 hole open cockpit parasol for example. > > If you just really really like the lines of a Piet=2C I'd consider the Ba keng and changing the shape of tail feathers=2C cowling=2C etc rather than changing the Piet too much. > > This from someone who picked a Piet so he wouldn't have to do ANY designi ng himself! > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385469#385469 > > > > > > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 16, 2012
Subject: Re: New Pietenpol Builder
From: Ken Bickers <bickers.ken(at)gmail.com>
I'm sure if it can be done, it has been done. I've never heard of anyone thinking that a shorter wing span on a Pietenpol was a good idea. Many people have advocated lengthening the wing span. I lengthened mine by a total of 18 inches, hopefully to give somewhat better climb performance at the high density altitudes where I'm located. Not flying yet, but it looks nice in the hangar. On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:50 AM, ellery voge wrote: > Has anyone tried reducing the wing span? Curious to know. > >> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: New Pietenpol Builder >> From: n0kkj(at)yahoo.com >> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:47:00 -0700 >> To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >> >> >> There's some small changes that are common enough that they are well >> vetted and you're not really just starting over... such as... >> >> A little more room between the wing and fuse. A little wider. The long >> fuse version and of course some more horse power. >> >> However, if you want something that's a little roomier and can routinely >> carry passengers along, you might seriously consider a larger plane. A >> Bakeng Deuce is a 2 hole open cockpit parasol for example. >> >> If you just really really like the lines of a Piet, I'd consider the >> Bakeng and changing the shape of tail feathers, cowling, etc rather than >> changing the Piet too much. >> >> This from someone who picked a Piet so he wouldn't have to do ANY >> designing himself! >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385469#385469 >> > ===================== > >====== >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Date: Oct 16, 2012
Subject: reducing the wingspan
Ellery, Welcome to the group and glad you're building a Pietenpol. This is a goo d group of folks and there are some very talented and extremely well versed and knowledgeable people on the list and most of them are even housebroken:). ! I've never heard of anyone reducing the wingspan on a Piet but rather makin g it longer. Most low power (65 horse Continentals and such) planes of the 1940's like Taylorcrafts, Luscombes, Cubs, and Champs had win gspans in the 35' range. The Pietenpols wing is only 29' so making it a little longer is goodness in that you will be able to lift more weight and that is important if you're on a shorter field or high elevation...even on hotter days it wil l help you. I built my Pietenpol with the standard 29' wing but if I had to do it over again I might make my center section wider as Jack Phillips did and if not mistaken Bill Rewey-this gives you more wing area, greater l ifting capability. I wouldn't hesitate to add 2-3 feet to the overall length of my wing. Whatever you built, Piet or other design, try your best to keep it light an d it will then be a GOOD performing airplane. Most of us are not 150 pound pilots like Bernard Pietenpol was so if you are heavier and y ou want to take a full-size adult for a Piet ride your best bet is too keep the plane light when building. Nothing is more frightening than wondering if you're going to be able to cl imb high enough on a hot day with a passenger to clear the tops of telephone wires or tree tops. Every extra pound you add is on e you'll have to take for each ride also. Mike C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Date: Oct 16, 2012
Subject: Barry Davis fantastic quote
Okay Barry-you are now my new hero. This is the best post I've seen on the list ever:)! In regard to the Tony Bingelis book series Barry writes: Unless you are an experienced builder, then I would buy all 4. If you are a n experienced builder, then I would buy all 4. Barry D ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Allan Macklem" <awmacklem(at)cox.net>
Subject: reducing the wingspan
Date: Oct 16, 2012
I'm interested in the pros and cons of lengthening the wings. I understand more wing area = more lift. What are the negatives (decrease in speed?) and how great are they? Widening the center wing section must have is limitation in relationship to the width of the fuselage. What width center section did Jack and Bill achieve? Can the wing tips also be extended 12-18" on each side? Seems like this would be about two ribs per wing. If the wings are lengthened what are the major changes needed to support the longer wings? Allan Macklem From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC] Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 2:58 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: reducing the wingspan Ellery, Welcome to the group and glad you're building a Pietenpol. This is a good group of folks and there are some very talented and extremely well versed and knowledgeable people on the list and most of them are even housebrokenJ. ! I've never heard of anyone reducing the wingspan on a Piet but rather making it longer. Most low power (65 horse Continentals and such) planes of the 1940's like Taylorcrafts, Luscombes, Cubs, and Champs had wingspans in the 35' range. The Pietenpols wing is only 29' so making it a little longer is goodness in that you will be able to lift more weight and that is important if you're on a shorter field or high elevation.even on hotter days it will help you. I built my Pietenpol with the standard 29' wing but if I had to do it over again I might make my center section wider as Jack Phillips did and if not mistaken Bill Rewey-this gives you more wing area, greater lifting capability. I wouldn't hesitate to add 2-3 feet to the overall length of my wing. Whatever you built, Piet or other design, try your best to keep it light and it will then be a GOOD performing airplane. Most of us are not 150 pound pilots like Bernard Pietenpol was so if you are heavier and you want to take a full-size adult for a Piet ride your best bet is too keep the plane light when building. Nothing is more frightening than wondering if you're going to be able to climb high enough on a hot day with a passenger to clear the tops of telephone wires or tree tops. Every extra pound you add is one you'll have to take for each ride also. Mike C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Douwe Blumberg" <douweblumberg(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: I flew Re-PIET!!!
Date: Oct 16, 2012
Well after ten years of work and a lifetime of daydreams, I flew "Re-PIET" today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Flew from the asphalt runway near my house to a grass paradise an hour away where she'll stay until I'm ready for pavement. The flight could NOT have been better in any possible way. Engine temps were good, (C-90 with Cloud Car prop) and she climbed very strongly (66 degree day with 12 gallons and 160 lb Douwe), about like the 85 horse Cub I've been practicing in with two people aboard, but I didn't have a VSI so I'm not sure. GPS said cruise was 75, but there was a bit of a tailwind, so it was probably more like 70. Flew totally hands off, seriously! The almost 1" stab offset is perfect, didn't need to touch the rudder to keep her straight and the servo elevator trim worked beautifully, just push the switch to get whatever trim you want. Was very pleased with that. Practiced some stalls at about 1,000rpm like landing and almost couldn't get her to break, she just mushed along. Power off was straight ahead and clean. Smoke system worked great, though I'll have to add some longer "downtubes" off my long exhaust to keep unburnt oil off the tail. Controls were super light and pleasant in all regards. Much nicer than the cub I've been flying. Landing was a non-event, except that the sun was directly in my eyes as it was evening and the refraction through the two plexi windscreens precluded ANY forward vis, plus the runway slants east so it was in the dark and I could NOT see the runway. Had to go around once, then really had to feel my way down, but it ended very nicely and she just settled down and tracked very straight. I didn't think I'd need goggles. I was wrong, I need them unless I sit right up behind the windscreen. Thanks all for your help, advice and encouragement through the years. Too many to name, but I am hugely indebted to you all. Just a lovely, lovely airplane in all regards... Keep building gents, IT'S WORTH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Douwe ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 16, 2012
From: Dave and Connie <dmatt(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: I flew Re-PIET!!!
That grin says it all. Congratulations. Dave ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 16, 2012
From: Andre Abreu <andre_abreu_2000(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: I flew Re-PIET!!!
Douwe, Wow... congratulation.- I have not experience building a Piet ... other t han having the privileged to get my ticket in it.....- Great airplane in my estimation.- It must have been a fantastic journey building a Piet.- I only dream to build on a flying machine.- Hats off to you and the gent leman.. God Rest His Soul... that build the "JOY" that I am so lucky to fly whenever I want and the weather permits. Andy --- On Tue, 10/16/12, Douwe Blumberg wrote: From: Douwe Blumberg <douweblumberg(at)earthlink.net> Subject: Pietenpol-List: I flew Re-PIET!!! Date: Tuesday, October 16, 2012, 10:35 PM Well after ten years of work and a lifetime of daydreams, I flew "Re-PIET" today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Flew from the asphalt runway near my house to a grass paradise an hour away where she'll stay until I'm ready for pavement. The flight could NOT have been better in any possible way.- Engine temps were good, (C-90 with Cloud Car prop) and she climbed very strongly (66 degree day with 12 gallons and 160 lb Douwe), about like the 85 horse Cub I've been practicing in with two people aboard, but I didn't have a VSI so I'm not sure. GPS said cruise was 75, but there was a bit of a tailwind, so it was probably more like 70. Flew totally hands off, seriously!- The almost 1" stab offset is perfect, didn't need to touch the rudder to keep her straight and the servo elevator trim worked beautifully, just push the switch to get whatever trim you want . Was very pleased with that. Practiced some stalls at about 1,000rpm like landing and almost couldn't ge t her to break, she just mushed along.- Power off was straight ahead and clean. Smoke system worked great, though I'll have to add some longer "downtubes" off my long exhaust to keep unburnt oil off the tail. Controls were super light and pleasant in all regards.- Much nicer than t he cub I've been flying. Landing was a non-event, except that the sun was directly in my eyes as it was evening and the refraction through the two plexi windscreens precluded ANY forward vis, plus the runway slants east so it was in the dark and I could NOT see the runway.- Had to go around once, then really had to feel my way down, but it ended very nicely and she just settled down and tracked very straight. I didn't think I'd need goggles.- I was wrong, I need them unless I sit right up behind the windscreen. Thanks all for your help, advice and encouragement through the years.- To o many to name, but I am hugely indebted to you all. Just a lovely, lovely airplane in all regards... Keep building gents, IT'S WORTH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Douwe ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5(at)comcast.net>
Subject: I flew Re-PIET!!!
Date: Oct 16, 2012
Douwe, You are a Pietenpol ICON!! and a real role model! Many happy landings... Oh...Congratulations on making the newsletter front page! Gary Boothe NX308MB -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Douwe Blumberg Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 7:35 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: I flew Re-PIET!!! Well after ten years of work and a lifetime of daydreams, I flew "Re-PIET" today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Flew from the asphalt runway near my house to a grass paradise an hour away where she'll stay until I'm ready for pavement. The flight could NOT have been better in any possible way. Engine temps were good, (C-90 with Cloud Car prop) and she climbed very strongly (66 degree day with 12 gallons and 160 lb Douwe), about like the 85 horse Cub I've been practicing in with two people aboard, but I didn't have a VSI so I'm not sure. GPS said cruise was 75, but there was a bit of a tailwind, so it was probably more like 70. Flew totally hands off, seriously! The almost 1" stab offset is perfect, didn't need to touch the rudder to keep her straight and the servo elevator trim worked beautifully, just push the switch to get whatever trim you want. Was very pleased with that. Practiced some stalls at about 1,000rpm like landing and almost couldn't get her to break, she just mushed along. Power off was straight ahead and clean. Smoke system worked great, though I'll have to add some longer "downtubes" off my long exhaust to keep unburnt oil off the tail. Controls were super light and pleasant in all regards. Much nicer than the cub I've been flying. Landing was a non-event, except that the sun was directly in my eyes as it was evening and the refraction through the two plexi windscreens precluded ANY forward vis, plus the runway slants east so it was in the dark and I could NOT see the runway. Had to go around once, then really had to feel my way down, but it ended very nicely and she just settled down and tracked very straight. I didn't think I'd need goggles. I was wrong, I need them unless I sit right up behind the windscreen. Thanks all for your help, advice and encouragement through the years. Too many to name, but I am hugely indebted to you all. Just a lovely, lovely airplane in all regards... Keep building gents, IT'S WORTH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Douwe ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: nose fuel tank supports
From: "taildrags" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 16, 2012
And glean what you may from the photos of the tank and supports on "Scout", here: http://www.flysquirrel.net/piets/repairs/fueltank.html -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385533#385533 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: I flew Re-PIET!!!
From: "K5YAC" <hangar10(at)cox.net>
Date: Oct 16, 2012
Great report Douwe! I can't wait to experience your excitement. Hope mine flies as nice as yours. -------- Mark Chouinard Wings, Center Section and Empannage and Fuse framed up - Working on Landing Gear Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385535#385535 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dick N" <horzpool(at)goldengate.net>
Subject: re piet
Date: Oct 16, 2012
Congratulations Douwe, You really need to get some kind of endurance award for that project. I really hope things go smoothly for you. Now you need to make it to Brodhead next year. Dick N. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: I flew Re-PIET!!!
From: Robert Bush <rbush96589(at)aol.com>
Date: Oct 17, 2012
Congratulations Douwe. Looking forward to seeing you and re piet at Brodhead next year. Randy Bush NX294RB Sent from my iPhone On Oct 16, 2012, at 9:35 PM, "Douwe Blumberg" wrote: > Well after ten years of work and a lifetime of daydreams, I flew "Re-PIET" > today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > Flew from the asphalt runway near my house to a grass paradise an hour away > where she'll stay until I'm ready for pavement. > > The flight could NOT have been better in any possible way. Engine temps > were good, (C-90 with Cloud Car prop) and she climbed very strongly (66 > degree day with 12 gallons and 160 lb Douwe), about like the 85 horse Cub > I've been practicing in with two people aboard, but I didn't have a VSI so > I'm not sure. > > GPS said cruise was 75, but there was a bit of a tailwind, so it was > probably more like 70. > > Flew totally hands off, seriously! The almost 1" stab offset is perfect, > didn't need to touch the rudder to keep her straight and the servo elevator > trim worked beautifully, just push the switch to get whatever trim you want. > Was very pleased with that. > > Practiced some stalls at about 1,000rpm like landing and almost couldn't get > her to break, she just mushed along. Power off was straight ahead and > clean. > > Smoke system worked great, though I'll have to add some longer "downtubes" > off my long exhaust to keep unburnt oil off the tail. > > Controls were super light and pleasant in all regards. Much nicer than the > cub I've been flying. > > Landing was a non-event, except that the sun was directly in my eyes as it > was evening and the refraction through the two plexi windscreens precluded > ANY forward vis, plus the runway slants east so it was in the dark and I > could NOT see the runway. Had to go around once, then really had to feel my > way down, but it ended very nicely and she just settled down and tracked > very straight. > > I didn't think I'd need goggles. I was wrong, I need them unless I sit > right up behind the windscreen. > > Thanks all for your help, advice and encouragement through the years. Too > many to name, but I am hugely indebted to you all. > > Just a lovely, lovely airplane in all regards... > > Keep building gents, IT'S WORTH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > Douwe > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: I flew Re-PIET!!!
From: Amsafetyc <amsafetyc(at)aol.com>
Date: Oct 17, 2012
Very nice congratulations and safe flying. John Sent from my iPhone On Oct 16, 2012, at 10:35 PM, "Douwe Blumberg" wrote: > Well after ten years of work and a lifetime of daydreams, I flew "Re-PIET" > today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > Flew from the asphalt runway near my house to a grass paradise an hour away > where she'll stay until I'm ready for pavement. > > The flight could NOT have been better in any possible way. Engine temps > were good, (C-90 with Cloud Car prop) and she climbed very strongly (66 > degree day with 12 gallons and 160 lb Douwe), about like the 85 horse Cub > I've been practicing in with two people aboard, but I didn't have a VSI so > I'm not sure. > > GPS said cruise was 75, but there was a bit of a tailwind, so it was > probably more like 70. > > Flew totally hands off, seriously! The almost 1" stab offset is perfect, > didn't need to touch the rudder to keep her straight and the servo elevator > trim worked beautifully, just push the switch to get whatever trim you want. > Was very pleased with that. > > Practiced some stalls at about 1,000rpm like landing and almost couldn't get > her to break, she just mushed along. Power off was straight ahead and > clean. > > Smoke system worked great, though I'll have to add some longer "downtubes" > off my long exhaust to keep unburnt oil off the tail. > > Controls were super light and pleasant in all regards. Much nicer than the > cub I've been flying. > > Landing was a non-event, except that the sun was directly in my eyes as it > was evening and the refraction through the two plexi windscreens precluded > ANY forward vis, plus the runway slants east so it was in the dark and I > could NOT see the runway. Had to go around once, then really had to feel my > way down, but it ended very nicely and she just settled down and tracked > very straight. > > I didn't think I'd need goggles. I was wrong, I need them unless I sit > right up behind the windscreen. > > Thanks all for your help, advice and encouragement through the years. Too > many to name, but I am hugely indebted to you all. > > Just a lovely, lovely airplane in all regards... > > Keep building gents, IT'S WORTH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > Douwe > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Phillips" <pietflyr(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: I flew Re-PIET!!!
Date: Oct 17, 2012
Congratulations, Douwe! And so another of next year's crop of new Pietenpols for Brodhead is ready (we've got to somehow convince Gary Boothe to fly his new creation from Cool to Very Cool). Next could be Jeff Bender or Gene Rambo. With all the tribulations you went through, I know it was worth it to have the feeling of making your first flight in an aircraft you created yourself. There is just no feeling like it. Jack Phillips NX899JP Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Douwe Blumberg Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:35 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: I flew Re-PIET!!! Well after ten years of work and a lifetime of daydreams, I flew "Re-PIET" today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Flew from the asphalt runway near my house to a grass paradise an hour away where she'll stay until I'm ready for pavement. The flight could NOT have been better in any possible way. Engine temps were good, (C-90 with Cloud Car prop) and she climbed very strongly (66 degree day with 12 gallons and 160 lb Douwe), about like the 85 horse Cub I've been practicing in with two people aboard, but I didn't have a VSI so I'm not sure. GPS said cruise was 75, but there was a bit of a tailwind, so it was probably more like 70. Flew totally hands off, seriously! The almost 1" stab offset is perfect, didn't need to touch the rudder to keep her straight and the servo elevator trim worked beautifully, just push the switch to get whatever trim you want. Was very pleased with that. Practiced some stalls at about 1,000rpm like landing and almost couldn't get her to break, she just mushed along. Power off was straight ahead and clean. Smoke system worked great, though I'll have to add some longer "downtubes" off my long exhaust to keep unburnt oil off the tail. Controls were super light and pleasant in all regards. Much nicer than the cub I've been flying. Landing was a non-event, except that the sun was directly in my eyes as it was evening and the refraction through the two plexi windscreens precluded ANY forward vis, plus the runway slants east so it was in the dark and I could NOT see the runway. Had to go around once, then really had to feel my way down, but it ended very nicely and she just settled down and tracked very straight. I didn't think I'd need goggles. I was wrong, I need them unless I sit right up behind the windscreen. Thanks all for your help, advice and encouragement through the years. Too many to name, but I am hugely indebted to you all. Just a lovely, lovely airplane in all regards... Keep building gents, IT'S WORTH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Douwe ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: I flew Re-PIET!!!
From: helspersew(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 17, 2012
Douwe, Congratulations man!! It's been a long hard road. A truly great example of perseverance! Beautiful work of art!! Dan Helsper Puryear, TN ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 17, 2012
From: shad bell <aviatorbell(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: I flew Re-PIET!!!
Congradulations!- It is truley a work of art.- If it flies as good as i t looks you have one heck of a gem there. - Shad --- On Wed, 10/17/12, helspersew(at)aol.com wrote: From: helspersew(at)aol.com <helspersew(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: I flew Re-PIET!!! Date: Wednesday, October 17, 2012, 8:03 AM Douwe, - Congratulations man!! It's been a long hard road. A truly great example of perseverance! Beautiful work of art!! - Dan Helsper Puryear, TN ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 17, 2012
From: Michael Perez <speedbrake(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: I flew Re-PIET!!!
Glad to hear it all went well. I hope to report as good flight characteristics when I get mine flown. It sounds like you have very little, if any, tweaking to do. Michael Perez Pietenpol HINT Videos Karetaker Aero www.karetakeraero.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Donald Lane" <dslane(at)embarqmail.com>
Subject: Re: I flew Re-PIET!!!
Date: Oct 17, 2012
Douwe, Super! Congratulations. Don Lane ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: I flew Re-PIET!!!
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Oct 17, 2012
Douwe, What a beautiful flying machine. You have out done us all. Now it is time to enjoy the wind in your face. Nothing more enjoyable then seeing the sun rise or set from the seat of your own Piet. What a great reward. Happy landings, -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385552#385552 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Date: Oct 17, 2012
Subject: Douwe flies Re-Piet for the first time!
I don't think I've ever read a first flight story that has had such a rich history of the builder staying with the program thru thick and thin with such a storybook ending of accomplishing your goal Douwe. You meet people at Brodhead who are camped and have photos of their first few wing ribs, you see them yearly and they give progress reports. 10 years later you hear a story like yours and it just is such a cause for celebration and satisfaction even for everyone--new builders and even people whose 1st flight was years and years ago. You did it right Douwe just like Gary Boothe in taking your time, getting it right, and especially in taking your time in getting ready by taking a good amount of training in tailwheel airplanes like the Cub you flew before had which helped make your 1st flight a non-event...just the way we like to hear about it. A total standing ovation from this infidel in Ohio. Mike C. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 17, 2012
From: "TOM STINEMETZE" <TOMS(at)mcpcity.com>
Subject: Re: I flew Re-PIET!!!
And let me add a resounding DOOOOWEEEEE! to the list of congratulations that have been recorded. You 'da MAN!, man. I look at your work of art and then look at my unfinished project just sitting there looking forlorn and wonder if it will ever know that kind of joy. It takes moments of inspiration like this to get me kick started sometimes. Just one question for you though. How did you route the electric wiring from your RAC trim servo into the fuselage? Did you pass from the elevator into the horizontal stab through the hinge line and then from the stab down into the fuse? If so, is there a way to disassemble the elevator from the stab without having to cut the wires and re-solder later? Tom Stinemetze N328Xray (wiring as we speak) ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: First Flight in Re-Piet
From: woodflier(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 17, 2012
Douwe, I know the words can't really capture what you were feeling, but I g ot a pretty good idea. Congratulations on this milestone. I sure hope you e njoy flying it as much as I have mine, and I can't wait to see Re-Piet at B rodhead next year. Hope I can get a ride. Matt Paxton ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: I flew Re-PIET!!!
From: "Don Emch" <EmchAir(at)aol.com>
Date: Oct 17, 2012
That's awesome Douwe! You deserve to be Re-Excited or Re-Deserving about your first flight! There's no other feeling like it! Don Emch NX899DE Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385563#385563 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 17, 2012
From: santiago morete <moretesantiago(at)yahoo.com.ar>
Subject: I flew Re-PIET!!!
Hi Douwe, congratulations! Fantastic airplane!=0ASaludos=0A=0ASantiago ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: nose fuel tank supports
From: Ray Krause <raykrause(at)frontiernet.net>
Date: Oct 17, 2012
Oscar, I have been meaning to ask you about your A 65 motor mount. Are you using it on the 75(85) Engine,was it destroyed? Did you make a new mount and did you build the jig for a new mount? I have to build a mount for my A-65 for the Skyscout and could use some help. I used the Piet hardware patterns and think the front of my Skyscout is identicle to the Piet. So.... I was hoping you might help me a little. Ray Krause Ps. Will you be coming up I-5 on the way to Oregon? Need a place to stay, want a ride in the Waiex? Sent from my iPad On Oct 16, 2012, at 8:52 PM, "taildrags" wrote: > > And glean what you may from the photos of the tank and supports on "Scout", here: > > http://www.flysquirrel.net/piets/repairs/fueltank.html > > -------- > Oscar Zuniga > Medford, OR > Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" > A75 power > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385533#385533 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: I flew Re-PIET!!!
From: "bender" <jfaith(at)solairusaviation.com>
Date: Oct 17, 2012
That's awesome ! way to go Douwe.... its really cool how many new piets are coming along Jeff Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385582#385582 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 17, 2012
From: Michael Perez <speedbrake(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Ray's A-65 Engine Mount Question
Ray, forgive me for intruding on your question to Oscar, but I may be able to share some ideas on building an A-65 engine mount.- Attached are pictu res of how I made mine.- The aluminum angle represent the fuselage bracke ts and the round washers on the ends of the threaded rod represent the engi ne mounting ears on the engine.- Ideally, you lay out the locations for a ll of these brackets/rods on the wood base and then install them. Since I m anged to make my wood base too small, I had to bend two of the rods to get the dimensions correct. Had the wood been the right size, all rods would ha ve been straight. - Anyhoo, if interested feel free to contact me as I have a few more pictures and all the details to build this jig and do the welding.- This jig make s it a snap to dial in down and right thrust to just about anything you wis h prior to welding. Michael Perez Pietenpol HINT Videos Karetaker Aero www.karetakeraero.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 17, 2012
From: Ryan M <aircamperace(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Ray's A-65 Engine Mount Question
Nice fit up Michael. What's your secret?=0A=0ARyan Michals=0A=0A___________ _____________________=0A From: Michael Perez <speedbrake(at)sbcglobal.net>=0AT o: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com =0ASent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 7:57 P M=0ASubject: Pietenpol-List: Ray's A-65 Engine Mount Question=0A =0A=0ARay, forgive me for intruding on your question to Oscar, but I may be able to s hare some ideas on building an A-65 engine mount.- Attached are pictures of how I made mine.- The aluminum angle represent the fuselage brackets a nd the round washers on the ends of the threaded rod represent the engine m ounting ears on the engine.- Ideally, you lay out the locations for all o f these brackets/rods on the wood base and then install them. Since I mange d to make my wood base too small, I had to bend two of the rods to get the dimensions correct. Had the wood been the right size, all rods would have b een straight.=0A-=0AAnyhoo, if interested feel free to contact me as I ha ve a few more pictures and all the details to build this jig and do the wel ding.- This jig makes it a snap to dial in down and right thrust to just about anything you wish prior to welding. =0A=0AMichael Perez=0APietenpol H INT Videos=0AKaretaker Aero=0Awww.karetakeraero.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 17, 2012
Subject: Re: I flew Re-PIET!!!
From: Greg Bacon <gbacon67(at)gmail.com>
Congrats Douwe!!! Way to persevere. Re-Piet is amazing. I'm really looking forward to seeing her at Brodhead. Blue skies! Greg Bacon On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Douwe Blumberg wrote: > Well after ten years of work and a lifetime of daydreams, I flew "Re-PIET" > today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > Flew from the asphalt runway near my house to a grass paradise an hour away > where she'll stay until I'm ready for pavement. > > The flight could NOT have been better in any possible way. Engine temps > were good, (C-90 with Cloud Car prop) and she climbed very strongly (66 > degree day with 12 gallons and 160 lb Douwe), about like the 85 horse Cub > I've been practicing in with two people aboard, but I didn't have a VSI so > I'm not sure. > > GPS said cruise was 75, but there was a bit of a tailwind, so it was > probably more like 70. > > Flew totally hands off, seriously! The almost 1" stab offset is perfect, > didn't need to touch the rudder to keep her straight and the servo elevator > trim worked beautifully, just push the switch to get whatever trim you > want. > Was very pleased with that. > > Practiced some stalls at about 1,000rpm like landing and almost couldn't > get > her to break, she just mushed along. Power off was straight ahead and > clean. > > Smoke system worked great, though I'll have to add some longer "downtubes" > off my long exhaust to keep unburnt oil off the tail. > > Controls were super light and pleasant in all regards. Much nicer than the > cub I've been flying. > > Landing was a non-event, except that the sun was directly in my eyes as it > was evening and the refraction through the two plexi windscreens precluded > ANY forward vis, plus the runway slants east so it was in the dark and I > could NOT see the runway. Had to go around once, then really had to feel > my > way down, but it ended very nicely and she just settled down and tracked > very straight. > > I didn't think I'd need goggles. I was wrong, I need them unless I sit > right up behind the windscreen. > > Thanks all for your help, advice and encouragement through the years. Too > many to name, but I am hugely indebted to you all. > > Just a lovely, lovely airplane in all regards... > > Keep building gents, IT'S WORTH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > Douwe > -- Greg Bacon ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Douwe Blumberg" <douweblumberg(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Thank you guys!!
Date: Oct 18, 2012
Thank you all for your kind words, they are much valued and appreciated!! Thank you all who let me "pick your brains" through the years, over and over and over. and over and never got irritated but just kept helping. Thank you to all of you who helped in any way, big or small to get her rebuilt. Thank you all for the rides and encouragement through the years. It is truly a great feeling, but it was a bit surreal, like it just kind of happened and before I knew it I was landing. Yesterday morning's flights were almost more real and relaxing as I was over the airfield and not ferrying her over unknown territory. Regarding the trim.. The servo is in the left elevator, inboard. There is a inspection cover so I can get to it. I purchased a short length of robotic wire designed for movement (talcum powder inside between the wires). The wire comes out of the moveable surface right at the inner corner and then drops down under and goes into a small hole in the ply on the side of the tailpost in the fuse. There are inspection holes on the fuse back there for access to tailwheel bolts, elevator bolts etc and inside there are two quick connects to the permanently mounted wire that runs forward to the switch so I can just reach in there and "unplug" the servo if I need to remove the elevator. Will keep reporting as I gradually acquire accurate flight info, and sending pics! Douwe ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 18, 2012
From: Michael Perez <speedbrake(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Ray's A-65 Engine Mount Question
The idea is not my own, per say. I got it from the EAA website, in their home builder video section. There was a great engine mount video there and I just tweaked it to be used on our Pietenpols. Michael Perez Pietenpol HINT Videos Karetaker Aero www.karetakeraero.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 18, 2012
From: Michael Perez <speedbrake(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: reducing the wingspan
You can ban me as well, (if not already...) because being a 612 builder myself, I agree with Paul! Michael Perez Pietenpol HINT Videos Karetaker Aero www.karetakeraero.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 18, 2012
From: "TOM STINEMETZE" <TOMS(at)mcpcity.com>
Subject: Re: Thank you guys!!
Thanks Douwe, that makes sense. Can you share where you go to buy "robotic wire?" Somehow that does not sound like something ACE Hardware - or even Aircraft Spruce - would carry. Tom Stinemetze N328Xray Regarding the trim.. The servo is in the left elevator, inboard. There is a inspection cover so I can get to it. I purchased a short length of robotic wire designed for movement (talcum powder inside between the wires). The wire comes out of the moveable surface right at the inner corner and then drops down under and goes into a small hole in the ply on the side of the tailpost in the fuse. There are inspection holes on the fuse back there for access to tailwheel bolts, elevator bolts etc and inside there are two quick connects to the permanently mounted wire that runs forward to the switch so I can just reach in there and unplug the servo if I need to remove the elevator. Douwe ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: I flew Re-PIET!!!
From: "kevinpurtee" <kevin.purtee(at)us.army.mil>
Date: Oct 18, 2012
Congratulations, Douwe! We're delighted for you. -------- Kevin "Axel" Purtee NX899KP Austin/San Marcos, TX Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385622#385622 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 18, 2012
Subject: Douwe's 1st flight
From: Timothy Willis <timwillis01(at)gmail.com>
Congratulations. Great job. Inspiring. All the posted accolades are on the mark. Tim in central TX ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 18, 2012
From: Jim Boyer <boyerjrb(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: I flew Re-PIET!!!
=C2-Well after ten years of work and a lifetime of daydreams, I flew "Re- PIET" today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Congratulations Douwe! You have a beautiful Re-Piet and glad you are now en joying flying it. Can't wait to see it at Brodhead. Jim B. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Ray's A-65 Engine Mount Question
From: Ray Krause <raykrause(at)frontiernet.net>
Date: Oct 18, 2012
Mike, Thanks for the information on the A-65 mount. I will use your photos and th e video to figure it out. I have a great friend who will do the TIG welding . I have the engine case free of all other parts so it will be easy to get t he mounting holes correct! Thanks again, Ray Sent from my iPad On Oct 17, 2012, at 4:57 PM, Michael Perez wrote: > > Ray, forgive me for intruding on your question to Oscar, but I may be able to share some ideas on building an A-65 engine mount. Attached are picture s of how I made mine. The aluminum angle represent the fuselage brackets an d the round washers on the ends of the threaded rod represent the engine mou nting ears on the engine. Ideally, you lay out the locations for all of the se brackets/rods on the wood base and then install them. Since I manged to m ake my wood base too small, I had to bend two of the rods to get the dimensi ons correct. Had the wood been the right size, all rods would have been stra ight. > > Anyhoo, if interested feel free to contact me as I have a few more picture s and all the details to build this jig and do the welding. This jig makes i t a snap to dial in down and right thrust to just about anything you wish pr ior to welding. > > Michael Perez > Pietenpol HINT Videos > Karetaker Aero > www.karetakeraero.com > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Oscar Zuniga <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: reducing the wingspan
Date: Oct 18, 2012
Those of you who receive the BPA Newsletter will notice my little commentary on the Piet design in the current issue. I take no credit for the engineering or math... all I did was compare my Air Camper's dimensions and proportions to the "rule of thumb" formulae to see how it shapes up. The indications are that per the rules of thumb, the stock Air Camper can use a bit more wingspan. Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 18, 2012
From: johnwoods(at)westnet.com.au
Subject: Re: I flew Re-PIET!!!
Congratulations Douwe! Your smile certainly shows you are one proud owner of one of the finest examples of this classic flying machine. Best regards, John Woods Perth W Aust ----- "Jim Boyer" wrote: > > Well after ten years of work and a lifetime of daydreams, I flew "Re-PIET" > today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Congratulations Douwe! You have a beautiful Re-Piet and glad you are now enjoying flying it. Can't wait to see it at Brodhead. Jim B. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Oscar Zuniga <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: nose fuel tank supports
Date: Oct 18, 2012
Ray asks- >I have been meaning to ask you about your A 65 motor mount. >Are you using it on the 75(85) Engine,was it destroyed? I am using the same mount, since the mounts for the A65 and A75 are exactly the same. The mount was not damaged in the nose-over. >Did you make a new mount and did you build the jig for a new mount? Nope... no new mount, no jigs. All I've done since mounting the A75 is changed the shimming to add downthrust and right offset, and it's made a very positive difference in cruise trim. Mike Perez is on the right track there. >Will you be coming up I-5 on the way to Oregon? Need a place to stay, wanta ride in the Waiex? No, not coming up I-5 till I get to Mount Shasta. I'll need places to stay, but I've got the numbers (Super 8 and Motel 6). I'd love a ride in the Waiex! Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 18, 2012
From: Michael Perez <speedbrake(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: reducing the wingspan
..and more vertical stab., less horizontal...if I read it right.- Had I k nown this, I would have tried a shorter horiz. stab. Good write up Oscar, thanks. Michael Perez =0APietenpol HINT Videos =0AKaretaker Aero =0Awww.karetakeraero.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: nose fuel tank supports
From: Ray Krause <raykrause(at)frontiernet.net>
Date: Oct 18, 2012
Thanks, Oscar. I always beat Motel 6 and Super 8 on both price and hospitality! If you come via I-80 I'm just off the route on Hiway 20. If you change your mind, let me know. Free food, free lodging and free flights... What else is there in life? Ray Sent from my iPad On Oct 18, 2012, at 8:18 AM, Oscar Zuniga wrote: > > > Ray asks- >> I have been meaning to ask you about your A 65 motor mount. >> Are you using it on the 75(85) Engine,was it destroyed? > I am using the same mount, since the mounts for the A65 and A75 are exactly the same. The mount was not damaged in the nose-over. >> Did you make a new mount and did you build the jig for a new mount? > Nope... no new mount, no jigs. All I've done since mounting the A75 is changed the shimming to add downthrust and right offset, and it's made a very positive difference in cruise trim. Mike Perez is on the right track there. >> Will you be coming up I-5 on the way to Oregon? Need a place to stay, wanta ride in the Waiex? > No, not coming up I-5 till I get to Mount Shasta. I'll need places to stay, but I've got the numbers (Super 8 and Motel 6). I'd love a ride in the Waiex! > Oscar Zuniga > Medford, OR > Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" > A75 power > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Ray's A-65 Engine Mount Question
From: "taildrags" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 18, 2012
Mike: It was suggested to me that the lower engine mount clusters be gusseted as well as the top ones, so when I made repairs to the airplane I had those gussets added to the mount. You can see them in several pictures here: http://www.flysquirrel.net/piets/engine/A75.html, but probably the last two pics on that page show them the closest-up. I suppose they do add some torsional rigidity to the setup and don't add appreciable weight. -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385657#385657 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: I flew Re-PIET!!!
From: "TriScout" <apfelcyber(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Oct 19, 2012
That's Awsome! ... the photo shows the vertical stab offset. I tried to type in re-piet on youtube just incase you had a vid there, but this is all I come up with. Not sure if it's related... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IaM6VnjiUzo&feature=plcp Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385662#385662 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: I flew Re-PIET!!!
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Oct 19, 2012
Love the video. Although the fabric looks a little loose. -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385663#385663 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: reducing the wingspan - Big Piet update
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Oct 19, 2012
Great to hear the updates. Way to go guys. I too have a piper wing. Mine is a wood spar clipped cub wing. Built to the Reed Clipped wing drawings with squared off tips. 27 feet in all. I wish it had two more feet of wing span. It would help a lot in high density alt situations and carrying two people. It too is a little faster than the stock Piets. WOT at sea level shows 100 MPH and WOT at 5000 it will indicate 93 MPH. Way to fast and not comfortable. I like flying it at about 70 or 75 MPH. More enjoyable that way. Keep up the good work. -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385664#385664 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 19, 2012
From: Michael Perez <speedbrake(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Ray's A-65 Engine Mount Question
Thanks for the note Oscar. With the lower engine members welded in an "X" pattern, I am not sure what adding these lower gussets achieve. Perhaps they do, but I just don't see it. Michael Perez Pietenpol HINT Videos Karetaker Aero www.karetakeraero.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: A Corvair Question for Corvair drivers
From: "jarheadpilot82" <jarheadpilot82(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 19, 2012
I know that this post is not really specific to Pietenpol, but I thought that this was a good place to ask for help. So all of you A-65 pilots, Rotec pilots, )-200 pilots, etc. just roll on by as this will probably not interest you- I am going to a junkyard tomorrow that says they have 8 or 10 corvairs "off in the weeds". I have William Wynne's Manual as well as his disassembly dvd, but they do not really address the how to of pulling an engine from a corvair. I wrote William Wynne and he suggested that I have someone fax or email me a copy of the 2 pages from Finch's book, the 2 pages that deal with dropping the engine from a car. Can anyone help? Terry jarheadpilot82(at)hotmail.com P.S. Thanks for any help in advance. If it is easier to fax, contact me off-line and I will get my fax number to you. -------- Semper Fi, Terry Hand Athens, GA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385678#385678 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: A Corvair Question for Corvair drivers
From: "jarheadpilot82" <jarheadpilot82(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 20, 2012
I got the information, so thanks to all who looked at the post. -------- Semper Fi, Terry Hand Athens, GA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385680#385680 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "C N Campbell" <cncampbell(at)windstream.net>
Subject: Re: A Corvair Question for Corvair drivers
Date: Oct 20, 2012
Hey. I'm not about to copy any of Finch's book without his permission. But the book does have some info on removing the engine from a car. I would suggest you buy Finch's "how to keep your Corvair alive" -- there is other information in it that you will need. C ----- Original Message ----- From: "jarheadpilot82" <jarheadpilot82(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 9:27 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: A Corvair Question for Corvair drivers > > > I know that this post is not really specific to Pietenpol, but I thought > that this was a good place to ask for help. So all of you A-65 pilots, > Rotec pilots, )-200 pilots, etc. just roll on by as this will probably > not interest you- > > I am going to a junkyard tomorrow that says they have 8 or 10 corvairs > "off in the weeds". I have William Wynne's Manual as well as his > disassembly dvd, but they do not really address the how to of pulling an > engine from a corvair. I wrote William Wynne and he suggested that I have > someone fax or email me a copy of the 2 pages from Finch's book, the 2 > pages that deal with dropping the engine from a car. Can anyone help? > > Terry > > jarheadpilot82(at)hotmail.com > > P.S. Thanks for any help in advance. If it is easier to fax, contact me > off-line and I will get my fax number to you. > > -------- > Semper Fi, > > Terry Hand > Athens, GA > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385678#385678 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: A Corvair Question for Corvair drivers
From: "jarheadpilot82" <jarheadpilot82(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 20, 2012
I have the book on order and it has not arrived. Seeing 2 pages before I go look at the engine I thought would be a help. I have also ordered the junkyard primer, I think it is called. I already have the green shop manual. -------- Semper Fi, Terry Hand Athens, GA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385686#385686 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 20, 2012
From: airlion <airlion(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: A Corvair Question for Corvair drivers
JUST START UNSCREWING ALL THE NUTS AND BOLTS YOU SEE AND SAVE THEM BUT YOU WILL PROBABLY DISCARD THEM ANYWAY. ALL THE IMPORTANT STUFF YOU WILL BE GETTING FROM WILLIAM. JUST MY 2cents worth. Gardiner. GO TO THE COLLEGE 24 to answer all your questions ----- Original Message ---- From: C N Campbell <cncampbell(at)windstream.net> Sent: Sat, October 20, 2012 9:51:48 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: A Corvair Question for Corvair drivers Hey. I'm not about to copy any of Finch's book without his permission. But the book does have some info on removing the engine from a car. I would suggest you buy Finch's "how to keep your Corvair alive" -- there is other information in it that you will need. C ----- Original Message ----- From: "jarheadpilot82" <jarheadpilot82(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 9:27 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: A Corvair Question for Corvair drivers > > > I know that this post is not really specific to Pietenpol, but I thought that >this was a good place to ask for help. So all of you A-65 pilots, Rotec pilots, >)-200 pilots, etc. just roll on by as this will probably not interest you- > > I am going to a junkyard tomorrow that says they have 8 or 10 corvairs "off in >the weeds". I have William Wynne's Manual as well as his disassembly dvd, but >they do not really address the how to of pulling an engine from a corvair. I >wrote William Wynne and he suggested that I have someone fax or email me a copy >of the 2 pages from Finch's book, the 2 pages that deal with dropping the engine >from a car. Can anyone help? > > Terry > > jarheadpilot82(at)hotmail.com > > P.S. Thanks for any help in advance. If it is easier to fax, contact me >off-line and I will get my fax number to you. > > -------- > Semper Fi, > > Terry Hand > Athens, GA > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385678#385678 > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: A Corvair Question for Corvair drivers
From: "jarheadpilot82" <jarheadpilot82(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 20, 2012
Gardiner, I am planning on being at CC#24. I hope to take one of these engines with me. -------- Semper Fi, Terry Hand Athens, GA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385689#385689 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 20, 2012
From: airlion <airlion(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: A Corvair Question for Corvair drivers
Terry, I am ready to start up an do some taxi test. That will be next week an if everything goes well I will fly it to CC24. Cheers, Gardiner ----- Original Message ---- From: jarheadpilot82 <jarheadpilot82(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Sat, October 20, 2012 2:49:27 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: A Corvair Question for Corvair drivers Gardiner, I am planning on being at CC#24. I hope to take one of these engines with me. -------- Semper Fi, Terry Hand Athens, GA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385689#385689 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: reducing the wingspan - Big Piet update
From: "aerocarjake" <flight.jake(at)gmail.com>
Date: Oct 20, 2012
Thanks for all these posts.... I plan to make my center section wider so I can carry more fuel in a enter-section tank, but it sounds like the slightly longer wingspan would not hurt either. (I had considered trimming a bay from each wing to keep the wingspan more stock.....?!?!). Working on the walking beam in the shop today after I drive the "first teacher in space" to an event at the Museum of Flight.... tough duty... -------- Jake Schultz - curator, Newport Way Air Museum (OK, it's just my home) Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385705#385705 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Went flying today...
From: "Mark Roberts" <mark.rbrts1(at)gmail.com>
Date: Oct 20, 2012
A friend of mine has the dealership rights to California for the Sport Cruiser LSA and asked me to help him sell some. I am in the midst of the 4th lay off in 7 years, so I figured what the heck?! We went flying today so I could experience the plane, and after not being behind the controls for 4 years, it sure felt great. I wish I was further along on my Piet, as it is hard to be stressed and worried at 4500 feet looking down on God's green earth! So glad to hear Douwe is back in the air with his beautiful airplane! The Sport Cruiser is one very nice plane, and I hope to get more time in one as time goes on. But you can't get bugs in your teeth with that big canopy! Need some fresh air for that... :) Not a substitute for an open cockpit! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385709#385709 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Went flying today...
From: gboothe5(at)comcast.net
Date: Oct 21, 2012
Way to go, Mark!! ------Original Message------ From: Mark Roberts Sender: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com ReplyTo: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Pietenpol-List: Went flying today... Sent: Oct 20, 2012 7:19 PM A friend of mine has the dealership rights to California for the Sport Cruiser LSA and asked me to help him sell some. I am in the midst of the 4th lay off in 7 years, so I figured what the heck?! We went flying today so I could experience the plane, and after not being behind the controls for 4 years, it sure felt great. I wish I was further along on my Piet, as it is hard to be stressed and worried at 4500 feet looking down on God's green earth! So glad to hear Douwe is back in the air with his beautiful airplane! The Sport Cruiser is one very nice plane, and I hope to get more time in one as time goes on. But you can't get bugs in your teeth with that big canopy! Need some fresh air for that... :) Not a substitute for an open cockpit! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385709#385709 Sent on the Sprint Now Network from my BlackBerry ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Went flying today...
From: Michael Groah <dskogrover(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Oct 20, 2012
That's awesome mark. !!! It's a good day when you get to go flying. Gary, did you fly that new prop today? Mike Groah 13 flight hours on my Piet so far On Oct 20, 2012, at 7:55 PM, gboothe5(at)comcast.net wrote: > > Way to go, Mark!! > ------Original Message------ > From: Mark Roberts > Sender: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > ReplyTo: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Went flying today... > Sent: Oct 20, 2012 7:19 PM > > > A friend of mine has the dealership rights to California for the Sport Cruiser LSA and asked me to help him sell some. I am in the midst of the 4th lay off in 7 years, so I figured what the heck?! > > We went flying today so I could experience the plane, and after not being behind the controls for 4 years, it sure felt great. I wish I was further along on my Piet, as it is hard to be stressed and worried at 4500 feet looking down on God's green earth! > > So glad to hear Douwe is back in the air with his beautiful airplane! The Sport Cruiser is one very nice plane, and I hope to get more time in one as time goes on. > > But you can't get bugs in your teeth with that big canopy! Need some fresh air for that... :) Not a substitute for an open cockpit! > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385709#385709 > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent on the Sprint Now Network from my BlackBerry > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Went flying today...
From: Ray Krause <raykrause(at)frontiernet.net>
Date: Oct 20, 2012
You have a new prop already? Did you carve it? You are a fast guy. Ray Krause Sent from my iPad On Oct 20, 2012, at 8:33 PM, Michael Groah wrote: > > That's awesome mark. !!! It's a good day when you get to go flying. > > Gary, did you fly that new prop today? > > Mike Groah > 13 flight hours on my Piet so far > > > > > On Oct 20, 2012, at 7:55 PM, gboothe5(at)comcast.net wrote: > >> >> Way to go, Mark!! >> ------Original Message------ >> From: Mark Roberts >> Sender: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com >> To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >> ReplyTo: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Went flying today... >> Sent: Oct 20, 2012 7:19 PM >> >> >> A friend of mine has the dealership rights to California for the Sport Cruiser LSA and asked me to help him sell some. I am in the midst of the 4th lay off in 7 years, so I figured what the heck?! >> >> We went flying today so I could experience the plane, and after not being behind the controls for 4 years, it sure felt great. I wish I was further along on my Piet, as it is hard to be stressed and worried at 4500 feet looking down on God's green earth! >> >> So glad to hear Douwe is back in the air with his beautiful airplane! The Sport Cruiser is one very nice plane, and I hope to get more time in one as time goes on. >> >> But you can't get bugs in your teeth with that big canopy! Need some fresh air for that... :) Not a substitute for an open cockpit! >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385709#385709 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Sent on the Sprint Now Network from my BlackBerry > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Went flying today...
From: "Mark Roberts" <mark.rbrts1(at)gmail.com>
Date: Oct 20, 2012
Hey Mike! We chatted about your plane today at the Airport. I told my friend I might be able to talk you into flying it up to Chandler one day after your allowed out of your "air cage" of distance from Porterville :D Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385714#385714 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Went flying today...
From: gboothe5(at)comcast.net
Date: Oct 21, 2012
I did! Short flight...if the wind stays down, I'll fly again on Sunday. Sent on the Sprint Now Network from my BlackBerry -----Original Message----- From: Michael Groah <dskogrover(at)yahoo.com> Sender: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 20:33:06 today... That's awesome mark. !!! It's a good day when you get to go flying. Gary, did you fly that new prop today? Mike Groah 13 flight hours on my Piet so far On Oct 20, 2012, at 7:55 PM, gboothe5(at)comcast.net wrote: > > Way to go, Mark!! > ------Original Message------ > From: Mark Roberts > Sender: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > ReplyTo: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Went flying today... > Sent: Oct 20, 2012 7:19 PM > > > A friend of mine has the dealership rights to California for the Sport Cruiser LSA and asked me to help him sell some. I am in the midst of the 4th lay off in 7 years, so I figured what the heck?! > > We went flying today so I could experience the plane, and after not being behind the controls for 4 years, it sure felt great. I wish I was further along on my Piet, as it is hard to be stressed and worried at 4500 feet looking down on God's green earth! > > So glad to hear Douwe is back in the air with his beautiful airplane! The Sport Cruiser is one very nice plane, and I hope to get more time in one as time goes on. > > But you can't get bugs in your teeth with that big canopy! Need some fresh air for that... :) Not a substitute for an open cockpit! > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385709#385709 > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent on the Sprint Now Network from my BlackBerry > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Went flying today...
From: Michael Groah <dskogrover(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Oct 20, 2012
Awesome Gary. I hope you get to go up again tomorrow. If the weather is good and this cold I have will let up I'll fly tomorrow too. Mike Groah Sent from my iPhone On Oct 20, 2012, at 9:47 PM, gboothe5(at)comcast.net wrote: > > I did! Short flight...if the wind stays down, I'll fly again on Sunday. > Sent on the Sprint Now Network from my BlackBerry > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Groah <dskogrover(at)yahoo.com> > Sender: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com > Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 20:33:06 > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > Reply-To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.comSubject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Went flying today... > > > That's awesome mark. !!! It's a good day when you get to go flying. > > Gary, did you fly that new prop today? > > Mike Groah > 13 flight hours on my Piet so far > > > > > On Oct 20, 2012, at 7:55 PM, gboothe5(at)comcast.net wrote: > >> >> Way to go, Mark!! >> ------Original Message------ >> From: Mark Roberts >> Sender: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com >> To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >> ReplyTo: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Went flying today... >> Sent: Oct 20, 2012 7:19 PM >> >> >> A friend of mine has the dealership rights to California for the Sport Cruiser LSA and asked me to help him sell some. I am in the midst of the 4th lay off in 7 years, so I figured what the heck?! >> >> We went flying today so I could experience the plane, and after not being behind the controls for 4 years, it sure felt great. I wish I was further along on my Piet, as it is hard to be stressed and worried at 4500 feet looking down on God's green earth! >> >> So glad to hear Douwe is back in the air with his beautiful airplane! The Sport Cruiser is one very nice plane, and I hope to get more time in one as time goes on. >> >> But you can't get bugs in your teeth with that big canopy! Need some fresh air for that... :) Not a substitute for an open cockpit! >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385709#385709 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Sent on the Sprint Now Network from my BlackBerry > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Going Flying
From: Jane and Fred <tbyh(at)aol.com>
Date: Oct 21, 2012
I hate when guys say they're going flying, then they go flying and then the y don't post any pictures! ; ) Just kidding...kind of... Best regards, Fred B. La Crosse, WI ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Greg Cardinal" <gcardinal(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Going Flying
Date: Oct 21, 2012
Here you go, Fred... Greg Cardinal ----- Original Message ----- From: Jane and Fred To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:43 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Going Flying I hate when guys say they're going flying, then they go flying and then they don't post any pictures! ; ) Just kidding...kind of... Best regards, Fred B. La Crosse, WI ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Going Flying
From: "pineymb" <airltd(at)mts.net>
Date: Oct 21, 2012
About to go flying.....does that count??? -------- Adrian M Winnipeg, MB Canada Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385722#385722 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/pietenpol_4_119.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 21, 2012
From: Ryan M <aircamperace(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Going Flying
Nice!! Where was that Greg?=0A=0ARyan M=0A=0A=0A___________________________ _____=0A From: Greg Cardinal <gcardinal(at)comcast.net>=0ATo: pietenpol-list@m atronics.com =0ASent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 9:00 AM=0ASubject: Re: Piete npol-List: Going Flying=0A =0A=0A =0AHere you go, Fred...=0A-=0AGreg Card inal=0A----- Original Message ----- =0A>From: Jane and Fred =0A>To: pietenp ol-list(at)matronics.com =0A>Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:43 AM=0A>Subjec t: Pietenpol-List: Going Flying=0A>=0A>I hate when guys say they're going flying, then they go flying and then they don't post any pictures!- ; ) =0A>-=0A>Just kidding...kind of...=0A>-=0A>Best regards,=0A>Fred B.=0A> La Crosse, WI=0A>href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List" >http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List=0Ahref="http://forums. matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com=0Ahref="http://www.matronics.c om/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Going Flying
From: darmahboy(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 21, 2012
Hey Greg, You on Line, What's the plan for today? -----Original Message----- From: Greg Cardinal <gcardinal(at)comcast.net> Sent: Sun, Oct 21, 2012 8:00 am Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Going Flying Here you go, Fred... Greg Cardinal ----- Original Message ----- From: Jane and Fred Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:43 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Going Flying I hate when guys say they're going flying, then they go flying and then t hey don't post any pictures! ; ) Just kidding...kind of... Best regards, Fred B. La Crosse, WI href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.matro nics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Going Flying
Date: Oct 21, 2012
Sorry, Fred. My bad, of course. In my defense, my new prop had me a bit puzzled, and I really only had time for one pass around the pattern. Camera was sitting right there beside me. As a consolation, I offer this pic, taken today, but too breezy to fly. Gary Boothe NX308MB From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jane and Fred Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 5:44 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Going Flying I hate when guys say they're going flying, then they go flying and then they don't post any pictures! ; ) Just kidding...kind of... Best regards, Fred B. La Crosse, WI ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Greg Cardinal" <gcardinal(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Going Flying
Date: Oct 21, 2012
Somewhere between Brodhead and LaCrosse, WI. Greg ----- Original Message ----- From: Ryan M To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 8:35 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Going Flying Nice!! Where was that Greg? Ryan M ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- From: Greg Cardinal <gcardinal(at)comcast.net> To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 9:00 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Going Flying Here you go, Fred... Greg Cardinal ----- Original Message ----- From: Jane and Fred To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:43 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Going Flying I hate when guys say they're going flying, then they go flying and then they don't post any pictures! ; ) Just kidding...kind of... Best regards, Fred B. La Crosse, WI href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Greg Cardinal" <gcardinal(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Going Flying
Date: Oct 21, 2012
Correction, it is the Lake Zumbro power dam north of Rochester, MN. (Thank you Bob Poore) Greg ----- Original Message ----- From: Greg Cardinal To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 6:46 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Going Flying Somewhere between Brodhead and LaCrosse, WI. Greg ----- Original Message ----- From: Ryan M To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 8:35 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Going Flying Nice!! Where was that Greg? Ryan M ------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- From: Greg Cardinal <gcardinal(at)comcast.net> To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 9:00 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Going Flying Here you go, Fred... Greg Cardinal ----- Original Message ----- From: Jane and Fred To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:43 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Going Flying I hate when guys say they're going flying, then they go flying and then they don't post any pictures! ; ) Just kidding...kind of... Best regards, Fred B. La Crosse, WI href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Going Flying
From: "biplan53" <biplan53(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 21, 2012
I agree with Fred I love to see the pictures you guys post. It makes for good inspiration and a lot of times it answers questions us builders have too. Thanks, Mike Smith.[/b] -------- Building steel fuselage aircamper. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385768#385768 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Oscar Zuniga <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: can a piet legally tow gliders
Date: Oct 22, 2012
Greg: some people install tow hooks on their airplanes to hold it in place while hand-propping the airplane solo. However=2C I believe Mountain Piet had a regular starter on the Subaru=2C so the hold-down would not have been needed and it must have been intended for towing. With the turbo Soob=2C it probably had enough power. Oscar Zuniga Medford=2C OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 22, 2012
Subject: Re: can a piet legally tow gliders
From: Greg Bacon <gbacon67(at)gmail.com>
Yes, Oscar, Mtn Piet has a starter. I'll get in touch with John. He may be able to shed some light on the towing regs issue. On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Oscar Zuniga wrote: > > Greg: some people install tow hooks on their airplanes to hold it in place > while hand-propping the airplane solo. However, I believe Mountain Piet > had a regular starter on the Subaru, so the hold-down would not have been > needed and it must have been intended for towing. With the turbo Soob, it > probably had enough power. > > Oscar Zuniga > Medford, OR > Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" > A75 power > > * > > * > > -- Greg Bacon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 22, 2012
From: Michael Groah <dskogrover(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Going Flying
Ok.. well the storm that kept Gary on the ground yesterday hadn't reached s outh to me yet so I got to go up for a couple of flights.=C2- My morning flight was a little bumpy as things were starting to warm up ( I could see dust devils forming in the fields surrounding me), but my evening flight wa s smooth as could be. It was just beautiful and I didn't want to come back down but the sun was setting so I didn't' have much of a choice.=C2- I ma de a respectable wheel landing, put the plane away and was able to log 1.9 hours for the day.=C2- I'm now up to 14.3 hours of flying in the plane. =C2- =0AThe attached photos were taken on my morning flight ( I didn't' n eed the jacket on the evening flight).=C2- Nothing special with the photo s, just a couple quick shots, like Gary I was more focused on flying the pl ane than taking good pictures.=C2- =0A=0A=0AMike Groah=0ATulare CA=0A=0A =0A=0A________________________________=0A From: Gary Boothe <gboothe5@comca st.net>=0ATo: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com =0ASent: Sunday, October 21, 201 2 11:34 AM=0ASubject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Going Flying=0A =0A=0ASorry, Fred . My bad, of course. In my defense, my new prop had me a bit puzzled, and I really only had time for one pass around the pattern. Camera was sitting r ight there beside me. As a consolation, I offer this pic, taken today, but too breezy to fly=0A=C2-=0A=C2-=0AGary Boothe=0ANX308MB=0A=C2 -=0AFrom:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpo l-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jane and Fred=0ASent: Sunday, Oct ober 21, 2012 5:44 AM=0ATo: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com=0ASubject: Pietenp ol-List: Going Flying=0A=C2-=0AI hate when guys say they're going flying, then they go flying and then they don't post any pictures!=C2- ; )=0A=C2 -=0AJust kidding...kind of...=0A=C2-=0ABest regards,=0AFred B.=0ALa Cro sse, WI=0A=C2-=0A=C2-=0Ahttp://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Li st=0Ahttp://forums.matronics.com=0Ahttp://www.matronics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Mtn Piet update Oct 2012
From: "taildrags" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 22, 2012
Greg: there is one thing that I have found and that is, whether you build one from scratch or just make some minor mods or repairs, the feeling when you hop in and get it in the air again is the same. You'll see ;o) -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385805#385805 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Deanie Montgomery
From: "taildrags" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 22, 2012
Time marches on. Some of you may recall that I have had a fellow named Deanie Montgomery overhaul several Stromberg carbs for me. Reading the list of names in "Gone West" in the most recent issue of Sport Aviation, I saw Deanie's name there and just like that, he's gone. Last time I spoke with him on the phone (I don't think he ever had email) he mentioned that he was starting work on an Air Camper and a Corvair for it. Here's an obit from the Corsicana, Texas "Daily Sun": http://corsicanadailysun.com/obituaries/x1395116878/Deanie-Montgomery . If anybody is near Corsicana and knows if Deanie had actually started a Piet project, maybe you can post an update here. Enjoy what you're doing while you still can. I can't wait to get Scout back home (just about 4 weeks till that happens). This Thanksgiving will include giving thanks for my wonderful wood and fabric Scout. -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385809#385809 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Date: Oct 22, 2012
Subject: there's trouble in paradise
Won't miss this guy. He cut and sliced up the veteran staff and cut some great people from EAA's HQ. [cid:image001.jpg@01CDB074.095FA350]HIGHTOWER OUT AT EAA<http://www.avweb.c om/avwebflash/news/RodHightower_ExperimentalAircraftAssociation_EAAPresiden t_SteppingDown_207552-1.html> In a surprise announcement Monday, EAA president and CEO Rod Hightower anno unced he was stepping down effectively immediately. The decision came follo wing a board of directors meeting in which former Cessna CEP Jack Pelton wa s elected chairman of EAA's board. EAA spokesman Dick Knapinski said Pelton has not been named the president o r the CEO but he will handle the transition from Hightower. Pelton will mee t with staff Tuesday. Hightower said he was stepping down to spend more time with his family, and he plans to move back to St. Louis. Hightower was hired in July of 2012 to replace former EAA president Tom Poberezny. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 22, 2012
Subject: Re: there's trouble in paradise
From: Ken Bickers <bickers.ken(at)gmail.com>
Agreed. I hope his replacement brings back a commitment to builders. One tangible piece of evidence would be bringing back the EAA SportAir Workshops. I attended the electrical systems and avionics class early in October in Broomfield, CO. There were only two more sets of workshops scheduled after that one: in Riverside, CA, and in Oshkosh. None were planned after those. On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC] wrote: > Won=92t miss this guy. He cut and sliced up the veteran staff and cut > some great people from EAA=92s HQ. **** > > * * > > **[image: Description: http://www.avweb.com/newspics/hightower.jpg]***HIG HTOWER > OUT AT EAA<http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/RodHightower_Experimental AircraftAssociation_EAAPresident_SteppingDown_207552-1.html> > ***** > > In a surprise announcement Monday, EAA president and CEO Rod Hightower > announced he was stepping down effectively immediately. The decision came > following a board of directors meeting in which former Cessna CEP Jack > Pelton was elected chairman of EAA's board.**** > > EAA spokesman Dick Knapinski said Pelton has not been named the president > or the CEO but he will handle the transition from Hightower. Pelton will > meet with staff Tuesday.**** > > Hightower said he was stepping down to spend more time with his family, > and he plans to move back to St. Louis. Hightower was hired in July of 20 12 > to replace former EAA president Tom Poberezny.**** > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 22, 2012
From: Jim Boyer <boyerjrb(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Going Flying
Hi Mike, Keep on building those hours so you can get it to Frazier Lake next June. Imagine it is getting cool in the Piet now; especially now that the rains are here. You look good in that flying helmet. Cheers, Jim B. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Phillips" <pietflyr(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: there's trouble in paradise
Date: Oct 22, 2012
Ding Dong. _____ From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 4:41 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: there's trouble in paradise Won't miss this guy. He cut and sliced up the veteran staff and cut some great people from EAA's HQ. Description: http://www.avweb.com/newspics/hightower.jpg <http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/RodHightower_ExperimentalAircraftAssoc iation_EAAPresident_SteppingDown_207552-1.html> HIGHTOWER OUT AT EAA In a surprise announcement Monday, EAA president and CEO Rod Hightower announced he was stepping down effectively immediately. The decision came following a board of directors meeting in which former Cessna CEP Jack Pelton was elected chairman of EAA's board. EAA spokesman Dick Knapinski said Pelton has not been named the president or the CEO but he will handle the transition from Hightower. Pelton will meet with staff Tuesday. Hightower said he was stepping down to spend more time with his family, and he plans to move back to St. Louis. Hightower was hired in July of 2012 to replace former EAA president Tom Poberezny. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: there's trouble in paradise
From: helspersew(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 22, 2012
Wow that was quick!! Did anybody think this original decision through? Scar y. Who's running that place? Dan Helsper Puryear, TN -----Original Message----- From: Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC] (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC] Sent: Mon, Oct 22, 2012 3:41 pm Subject: Pietenpol-List: there's trouble in paradise Won=99t miss this guy. He cut and sliced up the veteran staff and cut some great people from EAA=99s HQ. HIGHTOWER OUT AT EAA In a surprise announcement Monday, EAA president and CEO Rod Hightower anno unced he was stepping down effectively immediately. The decision came follo wing a board of directors meeting in which former Cessna CEP Jack Pelton wa s elected chairman of EAA's board. EAA spokesman Dick Knapinski said Pelton has not been named the president o r the CEO but he will handle the transition from Hightower. Pelton will mee t with staff Tuesday. Hightower said he was stepping down to spend more time with his family, and he plans to move back to St. Louis. Hightower was hired in July of 2012 to replace former EAA president Tom Poberezny. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: there's trouble in paradise
From: helspersew(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 22, 2012
Those SportAir workshops were GREAT! I myself attended two of them. Can't i magine why he wanted to eliminate them. Dan Helsper Puryear, TN -----Original Message----- From: Ken Bickers <bickers.ken(at)gmail.com> Sent: Mon, Oct 22, 2012 3:57 pm Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: there's trouble in paradise Agreed. I hope his replacement brings back a commitment to builders. One tangible piece of evidence would be bringing back the EAA SportAir Workshop s. I attended the electrical systems and avionics class early in October i n Broomfield, CO. There were only two more sets of workshops scheduled aft er that one: in Riverside, CA, and in Oshkosh. None were planned after tho se. On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partner s, LLC] wrote: Won=99t miss this guy. He cut and sliced up the veteran staff and cut some great people from EAA=99s HQ. HIGHTOWER OUT AT EAA In a surprise announcement Monday, EAA president and CEO Rod Hightower anno unced he was stepping down effectively immediately. The decision came follo wing a board of directors meeting in which former Cessna CEP Jack Pelton wa s elected chairman of EAA's board. EAA spokesman Dick Knapinski said Pelton has not been named the president o r the CEO but he will handle the transition from Hightower. Pelton will mee t with staff Tuesday. Hightower said he was stepping down to spend more time with his family, and he plans to move back to St. Louis. Hightower was hired in July of 2012 to replace former EAA president Tom Poberezny. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 22, 2012
Subject: Re: there's trouble in paradise
From: Ryan Mueller <ryan(at)rmueller.org>
They weren't selling enough Ford's or Deere's at them, of course.... On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 5:39 PM, wrote: > Those SportAir workshops were GREAT! I myself attended two of them. Can't > imagine why he wanted to eliminate them. > > Dan Helsper > Puryear, TN > -----Original Message----- > From: Ken Bickers <bickers.ken(at)gmail.com> > To: pietenpol-list > Sent: Mon, Oct 22, 2012 3:57 pm > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: there's trouble in paradise > > Agreed. I hope his replacement brings back a commitment to builders. > One tangible piece of evidence would be bringing back the EAA SportAir > Workshops. I attended the electrical systems and avionics class early in > October in Broomfield, CO. There were only two more sets of workshops > scheduled after that one: in Riverside, CA, and in Oshkosh. None were > planned after those. > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage > Partners, LLC] wrote: > >> Won=92t miss this guy. He cut and sliced up the veteran staff and cu t >> some great people from EAA=92s HQ. **** >> * * >> **[image: Description: http://www.avweb.com/newspics/hightower.jpg]***HI GHTOWER >> OUT AT EAA<http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/RodHightower_Experimenta lAircraftAssociation_EAAPresident_SteppingDown_207552-1.html> >> ***** >> In a surprise announcement Monday, EAA president and CEO Rod Hightower >> announced he was stepping down effectively immediately. The decision cam e >> following a board of directors meeting in which former Cessna CEP Jack >> Pelton was elected chairman of EAA's board.**** >> EAA spokesman Dick Knapinski said Pelton has not been named the presiden t >> or the CEO but he will handle the transition from Hightower. Pelton will >> meet with staff Tuesday.**** >> Hightower said he was stepping down to spend more time with his family, >> and he plans to move back to St. Louis. Hightower was hired in July of 2 012 >> to replace former EAA president Tom Poberezny.**** >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Deanie Montgomery
From: "biplan53" <biplan53(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 22, 2012
One thing I have found in home built airplanes is you meet some of the best people. I have found that people will step up and share information with no thought of self profit and proud to help any way they can.[/b] -------- Building steel fuselage aircamper. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385824#385824 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Hightower's "Resignation"
From: woodflier(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 23, 2012
Mike, I couldn't agree with you more. If you read between the lines, it loo ks like the board wanted him out. When I had my incident at OSH this year, I had terrific help from a lot of EAA volunteers, and most of them were not Hightower fans, by a long shot. Ask around about the $30,000 golf cart he demanded. I've always camped in North 40 with a bunch of people, and we all fly in together so that we can camp together. This year, it almost looked like the marching orders were to intentionally not park groups together. Th ere were a lot of upset folks, not just in our group. I also hope they bring back the Sportair workshops. I attended several and they were great. Good riddance! Matt Paxton ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Thanks Mike!
From: "echobravo4" <eab4(at)comcast.net>
Date: Oct 23, 2012
Dispute the cold gray day- had a great visit with Mr. Cuy over the weekend First time I've seen the plane in person It really is a beautiful job! Thanks again Mike for taking the time And all the info Earl -------- Earl Brown I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I intended to be. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385846#385846 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/image_187.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Towing Gliders
From: woodflier(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 23, 2012
Paul, this may have already been covered, but I would think that if glider towing is including in the Operating Limitations, you could legally do it. You may not be able to do it for hire, though. I'm a glider pilot and a tow pilot for our glider club. If the ultralight glider can be towed at speeds of 55-60 mph, a Piet with a 75 or 85 hp engine might be a good towplane. I would hesitate to tow with my 65 hp. Piet unless I was operating out of a long strip with no obstructions. You need good climb performance in a towpl ane, so more power would be a good thing since that's about all that added power does for a Piet, increase the climb rate. I'd also want the release l ever on the towplane end to be easily accessible. If it was on the floor, w here many towplanes have them, it would be a struggle to reach it quickly. I'd want a knob on the panel or just below it, very much like the red knob in the center of the panel in the sailplane I fly. If you're going to do a lot of towing, make sure your cooling is a good as you can make it. If you' re using a Continental, make sure you have the inter-cylinder baffles insta lled. A mechanical CHT gauge wouldn't be a bad idea also. Matt Paxton ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Date: Oct 23, 2012
Subject: Paul's new Pietenpol
Paul-- Do you have a paint scheme selected yet for your Pietenpol? Sounds like you'll be using the Corvair engine and the Riblett wing. Mike C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Date: Oct 23, 2012
Subject: Thanks Mike!
Enjoyed our visit Earl Brown and hope your class reunion out in Chardon was fun. Too bad it wasn't today---we are in the low 70's. Hope you're going to keep making sawdust this winter in PA! All the best, Mike C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "C N Campbell" <cncampbell(at)windstream.net>
Subject: Re: Hightower's "Resignation"
Date: Oct 23, 2012
Yeah, I'm going to renew one more year. If things don't change I've had it! C ----- Original Message ----- From: woodflier(at)aol.com To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 10:04 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Hightower's "Resignation" Mike, I couldn't agree with you more. If you read between the lines, it looks like the board wanted him out. When I had my incident at OSH this year, I had terrific help from a lot of EAA volunteers, and most of them were not Hightower fans, by a long shot. Ask around about the $30,000 golf cart he demanded. I've always camped in North 40 with a bunch of people, and we all fly in together so that we can camp together. This year, it almost looked like the marching orders were to intentionally not park groups together. There were a lot of upset folks, not just in our group. I also hope they bring back the Sportair workshops. I attended several and they were great. Good riddance! Matt Paxton ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Pulleys
From: "Larry V" <larryvangerven(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 23, 2012
Hello Everyone, I read this forum everyday and it keeps me motivated in moving forward on building my piet. I am looking at getting the pulleys for the aileron cables. The plans call for 2 inch formica pulleys and 3/32 cable. I am looking at ordering the pulleys from aircraft spruce part # A-123 (nas) it doesn't show any hub dia. or load limit (lbs). I was wondering if anyone could tell me if these pulleys are ok or have any other suggestions? Thanks Larry V Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385897#385897 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chris" <catdesigns(at)att.net>
Subject: Pulleys
Date: Oct 23, 2012
Larry The A-123 series pulleys are used on secondary controls because the pulley has a plain bore. The MS24566 series are used on primary controls because they have a sealed ball bearing hub. I am using the MS24566-3B pulleys because I quite frankly didn't realize the aileron control cables were only 3/32nd. If I would have known this I might have gone with the -2B and modified the fitting. As it is I will just watch and see if it's a problem for the 3/32 cable but I don't think it will be a problem. Chris Sacramento, Ca Westcoastpiet.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Larry V Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 6:34 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Pulleys --> Hello Everyone, I read this forum everyday and it keeps me motivated in moving forward on building my piet. I am looking at getting the pulleys for the aileron cables. The plans call for 2 inch formica pulleys and 3/32 cable. I am looking at ordering the pulleys from aircraft spruce part # A-123 (nas) it doesn't show any hub dia. or load limit (lbs). I was wondering if anyone could tell me if these pulleys are ok or have any other suggestions? Thanks Larry V Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385897#385897 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Pulleys
From: "Larry V" <larryvangerven(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 24, 2012
Chris. thanks for the information. Larry V Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385910#385910 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Robert Dewenter" <rdewenter(at)woh.rr.com>
Subject: Mountains
Date: Oct 24, 2012
Hello all Piet enthusiasts I want to encourage anyone who is "stuck" on/in their Piet project facing a "mountain" that has you stuck to either reach out to a fellow builder, or just face it head on and push through it. I have just faced another "mountain" and I have overcome it. If I had not, my project would have begun to collect dust. This past weekend I began installing my wood straight axle LG fittings onto the fuselage and it is going quite well. A lot of trepidation about drilling the bolt holes "true and straight" was my main concern followed by cutting out "slots" for the inner fittings. I trusted in my fabricated drill guide and I went for it. After seeing the first pair of fitting with bolts going through them I was very happy. I'm very excited now about my progress on my Piet. Facing this challenge and completing the turtle deck has given me the even more confidence that I will complete it and continue to have a blast doing so. If your "mountain" is engine related, no matter what engine it is, Corvair College is a great place to go. Even as a spectator you will learn a lot about building a flight engine, and it might be the catalyst that gets you over the mountain and allow you to look back and see it was just a mole hill - as I did on several occasions. Bob Dewenter Dayton OH Now an editorial: It looks like perhaps EAA is getting the message that many of us in the Piet community feel like EAA is not looking out for the interests of the "grass roots" home builder. The new Experimenter monthly digital magazine is very nice, but is in danger of becoming its big brother "Sport Aviation". For those of you looking for a "grass roots" group focused on building airplanes "a hundred dollars at a time" consider also joining the newly re-started Sport Aviation Association. It's back and led by Ed and Val Fisher, along with several others in supporting roles. Ed and Val will be at the Corvair College in Barnwell in a couple of weeks. Ed Fisher along with Editor Jeff Lange have put out a first issue and it is the same flavor as is BPAN - printed, mailed, fun to read. Membership is donation based. They have a website: http://www.sportaviationassociation.org/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Carbs
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Oct 24, 2012
Not sure if this link has been passed around before. If so, here it goes again. Great info on the Stromberg Carbs. (http://forums.matronics.com/posting.php?mode=newtopic&f=7) -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385917#385917 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 24, 2012
From: Michael Perez <speedbrake(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: P-Lead, Wire, Grounding, AM4 Mags
Crew, I am ready to make up my P-leads for my Eisemann mags and am not clea r on how to do so.- I would like to use sheilded, (braid) wires but am no t sure how to make the connections at the switch nor at the mag. How/where do I ground the braid? I assume I need to run grounding wires from the engi ne, to the mount and also to the mag P-lead braid...true? If anyone has these mags and can take a picture of how the connection is ma de at the mag, that is about all I need...I believe. Thanks. Michael Perez =0APietenpol HINT Videos =0AKaretaker Aero =0Awww.karetakeraero.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 24, 2012
From: steve(at)wotelectronics.com
Subject: Re: P-Lead, Wire, Grounding, AM4 Mags
Yesterday I was giving a friend some tips on replacing p-leads on a Grumman. Here is some of the stuff I sent him: I think 18awg shielded wire is correct: http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/elpages/shieldwire.php?clickkey=6369 [1] More information: http://www.verticalpower.com/forums/showthread.php?683-P-lead-wiring-to-magneto [2] www.aeroelectric.com/articles/MAGNETOSwitchOptions.pdf The most informative aircraft mainteance web site in the world: http://www.sacskyranch.com/faqslickmagneto.htm [3] The mag should have a screw terminal where you'll connect the ground braid (and another insulated terminal for the p-lead or center conductor). It is also connected to the mag switch at the other end (to kill the motor). I think the mags are grounded through the engine case so no ground is needed to the case. The case should have a braided (flexible) ground strap to the engine mount I believe. It probably isn't that important for a wood Piet...in metal aircraft you are bonding the engine to the airframe with that strap. Doesn't do much good with a wood fuselage. Be sure to brace/secure your wires every few inches or they will break in short order due to vibration! Good luck! Steve Ruse Norman, OK On 2012-10-24 13:02, Michael Perez wrote: > Crew, I am ready to make up my P-leads for my Eisemann mags and am not clear on how to do so. I would like to use sheilded, (braid) wires but am not sure how to make the connections at the switch nor at the mag. How/where do I ground the braid? I assume I need to run grounding wires from the engine, to the mount and also to the mag P-lead braid...true? > > If anyone has these mags and can take a picture of how the connection is made at the mag, that is about all I need...I believe. > > Thanks. > > Michael Perez > Pietenpol HINT Videos > Karetaker Aero > www.karetakeraero.com > > HTTP://WWW.MATRONICS.COM/CONTRIBUTION Links: ------ [1] http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/elpages/shieldwire.php?clickkey=6369 [2] http://www.verticalpower.com/forums/showthread.php?683-P-lead-wiring-to-magneto [3] http://www.sacskyranch.com/faqslickmagneto.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Build Logs
From: "John Francis" <Mrkringles(at)msn.com>
Date: Oct 24, 2012
It looks as though mykitplane is gone. I've gotten no response from the administrator and the sight (and all my past info) is lost. Time to move on. I want to post pictures and share with friends my build log. I believe kit log pro is the way to go for me. I however have a mac and will need to install a windows operating system for this app to work. Should I buy windows 7 or wait for windows 8? I thought maybe some of you apple guys or computer people might have some words of wisdom for me before I make the plunge. Thanks -------- John Francis Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385929#385929 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: P-Lead, Wire, Grounding, AM4 Mags
From: "taildrags" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 24, 2012
The ignition wiring on Scout is done exactly as Steve has described. Note, however, that this goes against what Tony Bingelis says in one of his books, at least the part about grounding the braid on the P-lead wire from the magneto to the ignition switch. I don't have my books here in front of me (I know, I know, Mikee- I should always have them with me ;o), but I believe Bingelis says that the braid should only be grounded at one end, not both. Not sure why that would be, though. And since the magnetos have a lug for landing the ground braid and the ignition switch does too (or at least a lug for landing the ground wire that shorts the P-lead to ground), I grounded both ends of the shielded wire braid. I am ducking for cover, as I see electrons beginning to fly from the electrical system gurus even now. -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385931#385931 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 24, 2012
From: Dave and Connie <dmatt(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: Build Logs
John, I am using a simple Wordpress blog. It is pretty simple to set up and edit. It is a different option and is operating system independent. You do have to get web hosting though. Mine is at www.bearhawklsa14.com Dave On 10/24/2012 4:30 PM, John Francis wrote: > > It looks as though mykitplane is gone. I've gotten no response from the administrator and the sight (and all my past info) is lost. Time to move on. > > I want to post pictures and share with friends my build log. I believe kit log pro is the way to go for me. I however have a mac and will need to install a windows operating system for this app to work. Should I buy windows 7 or wait for windows 8? I thought maybe some of you apple guys or computer people might have some words of wisdom for me before I make the plunge. > > Thanks > > -------- > John Francis > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385929#385929 > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 24, 2012
From: steve(at)wotelectronics.com
Subject: Re: P-Lead, Wire, Grounding, AM4 Mags
I don't have Tony's book, but what he means is that the braid should not be grounded to the airframe at both ends. What you are doing is using the braid as your grounding conductor for the mag which means the braid is not connected to ground at the switch end when the engine is operating, so there is no chance for noise issues if you had parallel ground paths. So essentially you comply with what Tony recommends...that is also how my plane is wired. A shielding conductor (the braid) is typically only grounded at one end I believe to avoid ground loops & noise issues due to having multiple grounding paths. Clear as mud? :) Steve Ruse Norman, OK On 2012-10-24 16:05, taildrags wrote: > > > The ignition wiring on Scout is done exactly as Steve has described. > Note, however, that this goes against what Tony Bingelis says in one > of his books, at least the part about grounding the braid on the > P-lead wire from the magneto to the ignition switch. I don't have my > books here in front of me (I know, I know, Mikee- I should always > have > them with me ;o), but I believe Bingelis says that the braid should > only be grounded at one end, not both. Not sure why that would be, > though. And since the magnetos have a lug for landing the ground > braid and the ignition switch does too (or at least a lug for landing > the ground wire that shorts the P-lead to ground), I grounded both > ends of the shielded wire braid. > > I am ducking for cover, as I see electrons beginning to fly from the > electrical system gurus even now. > > -------- > Oscar Zuniga > Medford, OR > Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" > A75 power > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385931#385931 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: I flew Re-PIET!!!
From: "Pieti Lowell" <Lowellcfrank(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Oct 24, 2012
Men are made of , exactly the thing you have accomplished, Congrats Pieti Lowell Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385949#385949 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 24, 2012
Subject: Re: Build Logs
From: Ryan Mueller <ryan(at)rmueller.org>
Hi John, It doesn't particularly matter whether you go with 7 or 8 for your purposes; Kitlog will run the same on both. Windows 8 has a new default UI, called "Modern UI" (formerly Metro), which is where Microsoft wants to go for the foreseeable future. See the screenshots in this gallery: http://www.theverge.com/2012/10/23/3542270/windows-8-review-screenshots#3885907 However, only apps written for Modern UI will run there. In order to provide compatibility with all existing Windows applications, there is also a Windows 7 style desktop. In your case you would install Kitlog, and it would add a Kitlog "tile" to that default Metro screen. When you click on it it would open Kitlog on the Windows 7 style desktop, and you would use it just like normal. Amazon and Newegg list the System Builder DVDs for Windows 8 at $99, and Windows 7 Home Premium at $91-$99, so about the same cost. As it sounds like you are primarily going to use Windows for Kitlog, you shouldn't need anything higher than basic 8 or 7 Home Premium; Pro versions provide more features for business environments, such as joining to a domain, etc. Windows 8 is the Windows future, whether we like it or not. It's been tested to boot up/shut down faster, and perform somewhat faster in general than 7 on the same hardware. If you're a longtime Mac user that doesn't mess with Windows much, you actually might have a lower learning curve.....you'll have less to "unlearn". There is a free to download/use Windows 8 Release Preview available from Microsoft; this is Windows 8 in more or less final form, and will work until 01/15/13. You could install that on your Mac via Boot Camp (or with Parallels/VMWare if you use that software), and grab the trial version of Kitlog to give the combo a test run to see if you think it will work for you. You can grab the ISOs for Windows here: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows-8/download On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:30 PM, John Francis wrote: > > It looks as though mykitplane is gone. I've gotten no response from the > administrator and the sight (and all my past info) is lost. Time to move > on. > > I want to post pictures and share with friends my build log. I believe > kit log pro is the way to go for me. I however have a mac and will need to > install a windows operating system for this app to work. Should I buy > windows 7 or wait for windows 8? I thought maybe some of you apple guys > or computer people might have some words of wisdom for me before I make the > plunge. > > Thanks > > -------- > John Francis > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385929#385929 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: P-Lead, Wire, Grounding, AM4 Mags
From: "taildrags" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 24, 2012
Clear as mud. I'll describe my setup in a little more detail and let's see what I have. Let's use the (stainless steel sheet) firewall as the starting point. Firewall forward, I have the braid shielded P-leads from a screw terminal block on the firewall, with the braid shields landed to a common "grounding" lug on the firewall. I put "grounding" in quotes because what the heck is it really grounded to? The metal firewall is really just the point of zero voltage reference, I guess you'd say. The leads continue forward to the magnetos, where I have the shields landed on the magneto ground lugs at that end. I have a flat braided grounding strap from the engine block back to the "grounding" lug on the firewall, so it sounds to me like there are parallel ground paths right there. It didn't seem to me that the engine mount points (through rubber donuts) were a solid metallic path between engine block, engine mount, and firewall so I added the flexible braided grounding strap. >From the screw terminal block through the firewall aft to the ignition switch, I have the braid shields of the P-leads landed on my "grounding" lug on the firewall at one end and on the ground terminal of the ignition switch, but other than that there aren't any continuous metallic grounding paths from the firewall aft. NOW clear as thick mud? For what it's worth, using a handheld COM radio has demonstrated that there is no noticeable ignition noise from this setup. -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385960#385960 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Build Logs
From: "K5YAC" <hangar10(at)cox.net>
Date: Oct 24, 2012
Kit Log Pro is excellent, and it does the things you are wanting, and then some. In addition, it is developed and maintained by Matt Dralle, who is also the administrator of Matronics. I really like the program and would recommend it first to anyone looking for builder's log software. -------- Mark Chouinard Wings, Center Section and Empannage and Fuse framed up - Working on Landing Gear Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=385965#385965 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 25, 2012
From: Michael Perez <speedbrake(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: P-Lead, Wire, Grounding, AM4 Mags
Thanks guys. My confusion is the fact that the wires have, in effect, two conductors...the wire and the shielding. My AM4 mags have a single post for the P-lead, so I am not sure what to do/how to connect the shielding. Michael Perez Pietenpol HINT Videos Karetaker Aero www.karetakeraero.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 25, 2012
From: Jim Boyer <boyerjrb(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: My hero my best friend
Hi Shelley, Loved reading Kevin's article. Flying is fun, looking forward to doing=C2 - it again soon. Cheers, Jim B. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Date: Oct 25, 2012
Subject: Airways Beacon: A nice stocking stuffer for your hangar/airport
I'm shamelessly posting this to all of you in case you're having trouble fi nding your home airport after dark. Just mount this thing to the top of your hangar and plug-er in . (Extension cord not included) http://www.barnstormers.com/classified_715265_Airway+Beacon+Historic+Sperry .html Mike C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Airways Beacon: A nice stocking stuffer for your hangar/airport
Date: Oct 25, 2012
Looking at that fine Pietenpol in the background, I completely missed the light! Gary Boothe NX308MB From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[Vantage Partners, LLC] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:09 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Airways Beacon: A nice stocking stuffer for your hangar/airport I'm shamelessly posting this to all of you in case you're having trouble finding your home airport after dark. Just mount this thing to the top of your hangar and plug-er in. (Extension cord not included) http://www.barnstormers.com/classified_715265_Airway+Beacon+Historic+Sperry. html Mike C. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 25, 2012
From: steve(at)wotelectronics.com
Subject: Re: P-Lead, Wire, Grounding, AM4 Mags
The shield just needs to go to a ground point that has a good electrical connection to the mags. The engine case or engine mount would work if the mount is electrically connected to the engine. I'm not sure what standard practice is for that type mag. Just don't put a ring terminal under any structurally important bolt or screw. Steve Ruse Norman, OK On 2012-10-25 08:28, Michael Perez wrote: > Thanks guys. My confusion is the fact that the wires have, in effect, two conductors...the wire and the shielding. My AM4 mags have a single post for the P-lead, so I am not sure what to do/how to connect the shielding. > > Michael Perez > Pietenpol HINT Videos > Karetaker Aero > www.karetakeraero.com > > HTTP://WWW.MATRONICS.COM/CONTRIBUTION ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Allan Macklem" <awmacklem(at)cox.net>
Subject: Increase Piet wingspan
Date: Oct 25, 2012
I'm interested in the pros and cons of lengthening the wings of my Piet. I understand more wing area = more lift. What are the negatives and how significant are they (decrease or increase in speed, other)? Somebody suggested widening the wing center section. What are the limitations of widening the center section, assuming that you do not intend to widen the fuselage? As an alternative, is it practical to extend the wing tips 12-18" on each side? What major changes are needed to support the longer wings? Allan Macklem ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Douwe Blumberg" <douweblumberg(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: P leads
Date: Oct 25, 2012
I did mine just like the Bingilis books. Grounded the shielding on the switch end and one the mag end. Seems to work. Douwe ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Build Logs
From: "jarheadpilot82" <jarheadpilot82(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Oct 25, 2012
John, I am a Mac guy. I use Windows XP and a program called VMWare Fusion. I have been very happy with the program. The choice of which Windows OS to use is purely your call. Fusion will run them all. -------- Semper Fi, Terry Hand Athens, GA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=386013#386013 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dick N" <horzpool(at)goldengate.net>
Subject: Re: Increase Piet wingspan
Date: Oct 25, 2012
Allen If you extend the center section, you dont have to modify the plans for the sections of the wings. Just be sure to build a right and a left. Forget speed, you cant do much to improve that. The center section will give you more room for fuel. Dick N. ----- Original Message ----- From: Allan Macklem To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 2:50 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Increase Piet wingspan I'm interested in the pros and cons of lengthening the wings of my Piet. I understand more wing area = more lift. What are the negatives and how significant are they (decrease or increase in speed, other)? Somebody suggested widening the wing center section. What are the limitations of widening the center section, assuming that you do not intend to widen the fuselage? As an alternative, is it practical to extend the wing tips 12-18" on each side? What major changes are needed to support the longer wings? Allan Macklem ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Douwe Blumberg" <douweblumberg(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: wing length
Date: Oct 26, 2012
If I was starting over, I'd lengthen the wings in some fashion, either a wider center section or slightly longer wing panels. Mainly because I've seen a couple fly like that and they perform markedly better on hot days with passengers. However, I must say that "RE-PIET" flies just fine with standard wings, and she's heavy. However, there's a big motor up there swinging a bit prop. One interesting observation flying a fairly heavy Piet is that she really handles the crosswinds nicely. Douwe ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Douwe Blumberg" <douweblumberg(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: RE-PIET flying characteristics
Date: Oct 26, 2012
Okay good people. Have flown RE-PIET now for five hours and thought I'd make an early pilot report. My darn GPS wouldn't turn on the first non-wind day I had, which was the day I had planned to get some accurate speeds.gotta love electronics. I have a wind vane airspeed indicator which isn't super accurate so I need something extra. She SEEMS to cruise at 70 at 2300. My favorite cruise condition is 2000, indicating around 60. Nice and quiet and she'll still climb, though slowly. Power off stalls are nice and gentle. Have no idea of the speed, the wind vane indicator reads zero. Power on stall is more like a mushing descent, it's hard to get a real break. She just hangs there like a Fokker D-7 with her nose in the air. She turns on a dime! After reading all the landing advice and watching hundres of landings over the last decade, I was prepared for a rather pronounced sink rate once I cut the engine. So the first few landings, I cut it closer than with the cub just to be prepared for the steep descent. and each time found myself floating across the runway longer than the cub! This is on 75 degree days on grass. She seems to float more than the cub I was flying, strange. I can't explain it because she's heavy, but maybe the wing axle fairing is helping a bit? Or the large airfoil wing tank? Who knows. So far she lands easier than the Cub, as it's really easy to decide when to stop her flying and because of that, you actually have more control of when things happen. She lands very easily. Yesterday was a no wind day and I was set up on final, coming right down at my aiming point and doing absolutely nothing with the controls thinking "shouldn't I be doing something"? felt weird as she just took care of herself until the roundout. Haven't tried best climb yet, need to get the gps fixed. I know I got 500fpm on the gps a few times, but have to experiment more. LIKES: Like the whole plane, she is delightful to fly. REALLY like the elevator servo trim system, VERY handy. Like the control placements for carb heat and mixture, on the left, under the control panel. Easy to reach but hard to see. Like the starter. Large wheels make taxiing over rough stuff pretty easy. Small tailwheel, makes the tail lighter. Nice having a powerful engine, I mainly cruise around now at 2000-2200 so she's sipping fuel like a smaller engine, but it's sure nice to have that power on climbout or just for fun. Smoking is fun!!!!! DISLIKES: Really would tilt back the pilots bulkhead a few degrees. Thank GOD I'm smallish. Have to figure something out for the fuel indicating system. My fuel indicator doesn't start reading until about five gallons which makes it kind of hard to keep track of things. I'm considering a small drop down tube type indicator in the back drain bung where I have my water drain. This could let me have accurate readings for probably the last six or seven gallons. We'll see. Small tailwheel. is lighter, but I'm sure I'll have to replace it regularly because it spins so fast. I have a bag of ten from McMaster Carr, takes three minutes to change. Have to keep those plexi windscreens clean or I can't see anything forward when landing into a setting sun. Note to self! Need to add longer "down pipes" to my long exhaust to direct the smoke from my smoke system away from the fuse and tail more. That stuff is yucky to clean. GPS is at Garmin now and I'll get some accurate numbers as soon as possible. So keep building, try to touch it every day, try to hit Brodhead as often as possible for ideas and motivation and then. keep building, DO NOT STOP and one day you will be looking at a finished aircraft, ready to fly. I promise!! THE ONLY TRICK IS TO NOT QUIT!!


October 05, 2012 - October 26, 2012

Pietenpol-Archive.digest.vol-lm