Pietenpol-Archive.digest.vol-ms
June 23, 2013 - July 14, 2013
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | shad bell <aviatorbell(at)yahoo.com> |
Subject: | Re: What oil in a Corvair? |
Thats what we use, and it works good. 330 hrs, and the filters are still clean
at oil changes, no chunks of metal. We are running a 12 plate corvair oil cooler
(from the corvair van I think), and the oil temp runs around 425-450 on 95+
degree days (400 at 75-80 degree day), measured in the pan. CHT about 325-350
on the same day.
Shad
--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 6/23/13, Larry Vetter wrote:
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: What oil in a Corvair?
To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com
Date: Sunday, June 23, 2013, 6:31 PM
--> Pietenpol-List message posted
by: "Larry Vetter"
So Rotella T 15-40 is the oil of choice for the Corvair? Any
Corvair even a non WW conversion?
Thanks.
Larry
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403240#403240
Email Forum -
- MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
List Contribution Web Site -
-Matt
Dralle, List Admin.
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | Re: First engine start on You Tube |
From: | "Mark Roberts" <mark.rbrts1(at)gmail.com> |
How fun Rick! Congratulations. Great feeling for all of us!
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403266#403266
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | Re: Martha Lunken |
From: | "stearmandriver" <pwr2800(at)gmail.com> |
Hello folks,
I can add a Martha story. Around 1994, I believe, I was flying for Rhoades Aviation
in Columbus Indiana, It was time for me to get typed in the Douglas Sleeper
Transport. aka DC-3. I flew to Lunken with the Chief Pilot to meet Martha
and do the type/ATP ride. Nervous as heck, this is a big day, we proceed to
her office. Nice big desk, nice office, in walks Martha. The oral exam is starting!
She can see that I'm scared to death. She eases into her big leather
seat, opens up the AIM/FAR. Looks up and over the top of the book and asks....."Dave,
do you think my butt looks big in these jeans?" First question of
the most important type ride of my life, and this is the way it starts! She made
me feel so at ease... The rest of the day was a breeze! What a lady! What
an advocate for GA. The FAA lost a great examiner the day she retired. Good
to see she still is a D.E.
Hope I did not bore anyone, and I look forward to getting home from this trip
and picking up my wing wood and fuselage steel.
Best Regards,
Dave Hughes
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403270#403270
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | Re: Sunset - send in your favorite photo |
From: | "pineymb" <airltd(at)mts.net> |
Sun setting to the West landing Rwy 17 at CJL5
--------
Adrian M
Winnipeg, MB
Canada
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403278#403278
Attachments:
http://forums.matronics.com//files/plane3_405.jpg
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | "l.morlock" <l.morlock(at)att.net> |
Subject: | Re: ELT requirement |
I ended up putting the ELT unit under the pilot's seat and the ground plane
& antenna just behind the pilot's seatback, similar to Jack's.
Whether an ELT is required seems to be up to your individual DAR's
interpretation of the FAR. Mine said I am not conducting training, so I
need an ELT regardless of how close or far I am from the airport. Also, I
tried to say it was part of the design and testing of the aircraft, but no
joy on that one either.
I bought a new ELT from ACS for $199.. Had access to older ones, but by the
time I modified them and renewed batteries, it was about as cheap to get the
new one.
Larry
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Charvet" <bencharvet(at)gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: ELT requirement
>
> The outdated 121.5 mhz Elts are still enough to make you legal, and are
> available used for pretty cheap. I had the one I use given to me by
> someone that had updated to the newer version. The 121.5 units don't
> really do much good. The guy in the hangar next door set his off
> accidently while doing some maintenance, and it went off for 5 days in his
> hangar before he was able to shut it off, and nobody except us hangar bums
> even checked on it. I use a Spot GPS device for safety.
>
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/Narco-ELT-10-System-w-Tray-and-Antenna-/370834214299?pt=Motors_Aviation_Parts_Gear&hash=item5657710d9b&vxp=mtr
>
> As Douwe said, you can spend your phase 1 time shopping and planning the
> installation.
>
> Ben Charvet
> (coming to Brodhead by car)
>
>
> On 6/18/2013 11:00 PM, Douwe Blumberg wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hey Larry,
>>
>> You absolutely are NOT required to have an ELT installed during phase 1
>> flight testing, if you do not carry a passenger (which you aren't really
>> supposed to anyways). You ARE required after phase 1 is complete. It is
>> explained very clearly in the FAR AIM.
>>
>> Douwe
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ben Charvet, PharmD
> Staff Pharmacist
> Parrish Medical center
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | shad bell <aviatorbell(at)yahoo.com> |
Subject: | Re: nose bowl for N92GB |
Ken, The rough measurements are:
24" wide, 23" tall (at the back), and 5" depth. The cooling openings are roughly
8" wide (at top and bottom edges) and 6 " tall. I would recomend widening the
nosebowl to 27"-28" or so to get it out to the width of the valve covers. I
believe this is what Kurt Shipman did with his, and it does look a little more
streamlined and less cumbersome. Our cooling shroud is just a stock corvair fan
shroud with the top closed in with a piece of sheet metal, and a "scoop" over
the starter for clearance. Read up in the Tony Bingalis books for the method
of mounting the nosebowl during fitting/trimming. A plywood disk or foam disk
was used to hold the nose bowl in place centered on the prop hub cutout. If
Dad has any pictures of him building it I will forward them to you. Hope this
helps.
Shad
Ken Bickers wrote:
Subject: nose bowl
To: "shad bell"
Date: Sunday, June 23, 2013, 11:25 PM
Shad,
I'm emailing in the hope that you
can help with some measurements of your Pietenpol nose bowl.
I'm close to being ready to make one, and as I think
you know have long admired the one your dad made.
If you have a moment, the measurements
that would be most helpful are the width, height, depth,
intake dimensions, and location of the intake and prop hub
holes above/below the horizontal center line and, in the
case of the intake holes, the location away from the
vertical center line.
I'm hoping you and your dad
subscribe to the motto that Imitation is the best form of
flattery.
Cheers, Ken
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | Re: nose bowl for N92GB |
From: | Ken Bickers <bickers.ken(at)gmail.com> |
Shad,
Thank you, thank you, thank you. This is very helpful.
Cheers, Ken
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:00 AM, shad bell wrote:
>
> Ken, The rough measurements are:
> 24" wide, 23" tall (at the back), and 5" depth. The cooling openings are
> roughly 8" wide (at top and bottom edges) and 6 " tall. I would recomend
> widening the nosebowl to 27"-28" or so to get it out to the width of the
> valve covers. I believe this is what Kurt Shipman did with his, and it
> does look a little more streamlined and less cumbersome. Our cooling
> shroud is just a stock corvair fan shroud with the top closed in with a
> piece of sheet metal, and a "scoop" over the starter for clearance. Read
> up in the Tony Bingalis books for the method of mounting the nosebowl
> during fitting/trimming. A plywood disk or foam disk was used to hold the
> nose bowl in place centered on the prop hub cutout. If Dad has any
> pictures of him building it I will forward them to you. Hope this helps.
>
> Shad
>
>
> Ken Bickers wrote:
>
> Subject: nose bowl
> To: "shad bell"
> Date: Sunday, June 23, 2013, 11:25 PM
>
> Shad,
> I'm emailing in the hope that you
> can help with some measurements of your Pietenpol nose bowl.
> I'm close to being ready to make one, and as I think
> you know have long admired the one your dad made.
>
> If you have a moment, the measurements
> that would be most helpful are the width, height, depth,
> intake dimensions, and location of the intake and prop hub
> holes above/below the horizontal center line and, in the
> case of the intake holes, the location away from the
> vertical center line.
>
> I'm hoping you and your dad
> subscribe to the motto that Imitation is the best form of
> flattery.
> Cheers, Ken
>
>
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | Re: ELT requirement |
From: | "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org> |
You guys are correct by stating that ELT's are not required during Phase 1 test
flights. However, If you do not have one in the plane for the inspection you
will need to contact the DAR or FAA again for a second inspection to verify the
installation. This could incur another upcharge from the DAR. at least this
is what I have encountered out here on the left coast. I am an EAA Tech Counsoler
so I see this question quite often. It is more seamless to just have
it already in the plane from the start.
My three cents,
--------
Scott Liefeld
Flying N11MS since March 1972
Steel Tube
C-85-12
Wire Wheels
Brodhead in 1996
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403306#403306
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | Michael Perez <speedbrake(at)sbcglobal.net> |
Subject: | Re: First engine start on You Tube |
Great Job Rick. Nice sounding engine and as always, these are the kinds of
videos that keep those of us STILL building motivated.- I am also slightl
y dissapointed that you did not over-dub some lame, obnoxius music over the
entire clip...=0A=0AMust feel like quite the accomplishment, good for you!
=0A=0A=0A-=0AMichael Perez=0APietenpol HINT Videos=0AKaretaker Aero=0Awww
.karetakeraero.com
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | Rick Schreiber <lmforge(at)earthlink.net> |
Subject: | Re: First engine start on You Tube |
On 6/24/2013 9:57 AM, Michael Perez wrote:
> Great Job Rick. Nice sounding engine and as always, these are the
> kinds of videos that keep those of us STILL building motivated. I am
> also slightly dissapointed that you did not over-dub some lame,
> obnoxius music over the entire clip...
>
> Must feel like quite the accomplishment, good for you!
>
> Michael Perez
> Pietenpol HINT Videos
> Karetaker Aero
> www.karetakeraero.com
>
Michael,
Whats really great now is that I don't have to sit in the cockpit and
make fake engine noises anymore!!!! I just got through ordering a
Odyssey PC680 battery so I don't have to jump start anymore.
Rick Schreiber
NX478RS
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | Andre Abreu <andre_abreu_2000(at)yahoo.com> |
Subject: | Re: Martha Lunken |
I took my Sport Pilot checkride with Martha Lunken August 2010 in 6186L at
Red Stewart.=0AWhat a day to remember.- She arrived in the morning in her
Cessna 180.- For such a mature lady, she sure knows her way around compu
ters.- We had problems with the IACRA website and she was able to trouble
shoot the issue and get the show on the road.=0A=0AOne memorable part of th
e checkride was the departure stall.- She insisted on a full power stall.
.. which we never did in this Piet since the CG was so far aft. Those pesky
unrecoverable spins and all.- When I babied the stick back, she took ove
r and gave the stick a quick yank into "key parts" of my anatomy.- I thin
k she grumbled something about a wimp.- I thought I was busted.- I wasn
't giving up though.- After the flight, she asked how I thought I did...
I said... "I would pass me!"- She laughed.- She passed me that day, so
I decided to get a subscription to flying magazine.- By far, she has the
best articles.=0A=0A=0AAndy Abreu=0A6186L=0AKTDZ=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A_________
_______________________=0A From: Charles Burkholder <born2fly(at)abcmailbox.ne
t>=0ATo: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com =0ASent: Friday, June 21, 2013 6:50 A
M=0ASubject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Martha Lunken=0A =0A=0A--> Pietenpol-List
message posted by: Charles Burkholder =0A=0AIntere
sting. I did my flight exam with her back in Oct. It was as low =0Astress a
nd relaxed as could be. During the test she told me her flying =0Astories o
f the area....Many times while reading her flying mag articles =0AI wished
I could meet her and never dreamed I would be able to fly with =0Aher.=0ACB
=0A=0AOn 06/21/2013 05:08 AM, John Francis wrote:=0A> -->- Pietenpol-List
message posted by: "John Francis"=0A>=0A> I had a sand
wich and coke with Martha Lunken last night.- My Piqua, OH EAA chapter me
t at "The End Zone" in Covington, OH for our monthly meeting.- We try to
get there at least once a year.- All other meetings are held in the Hartz
ell Hangar at the airport.=0A>=0A> Martha regularly flies up from Lunken ai
rport in her Cessna 180 for the meeting and flies home the same evening.-
She will likely by my flight examiner when I go for my Sport License.=0A>
=0A> She told me she once owned a Pietenpol built by Bernard himself.- Sh
e believes it is now in Wisconsin.- Can anyone tell me more about the whe
reabouts of this aircraft and who owns it?=0A>=0A> Thanks=0A>=0A> --------
=0A> John Francis=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A> Read this topic online here:=0A>=0A>
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403078#403078=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>
=
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | Re: ELT requirement |
From: | helspersew(at)aol.com |
Still haven't put mine in.....resisting.......arrrrg. I guess I'll just tak
e it out of the Aeronca. Its one of those that just slips into a channel fo
r installation. I can only fly one airplane at a time anyhow.
Dan Helsper
Puryear, TN
-----Original Message-----
From: AircamperN11MS <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Sent: Mon, Jun 24, 2013 12:19 pm
Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: ELT requirement
y.org>
You guys are correct by stating that ELT's are not required during Phase 1
test
flights. However, If you do not have one in the plane for the inspection y
ou
will need to contact the DAR or FAA again for a second inspection to verify
the
installation. This could incur another upcharge from the DAR. at least th
is is
what I have encountered out here on the left coast. I am an EAA Tech Couns
oler
so I see this question quite often. It is more seamless to just have it al
ready
in the plane from the start.
My three cents,
--------
Scott Liefeld
Flying N11MS since March 1972
Steel Tube
C-85-12
Wire Wheels
Brodhead in 1996
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403306#403306
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | Re: squirrelly on the gear |
From: | "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org> |
I just measured mine yesterday. Tread width is 52" and the top of the longeron
is 49.5" .
--------
Scott Liefeld
Flying N11MS since March 1972
Steel Tube
C-85-12
Wire Wheels
Brodhead in 1996
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403334#403334
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | Re: squirrelly on the gear |
From: | Gary Boothe <gboothe5(at)comcast.net> |
I'll be the first to admit that my problems may be as much pilot related as anything,
but my re-work includes a spring and a bonafide Matco tailwheel like Mike
Groah and Kevin's, placing the wheel further back. My plans-built set up has
always been sloppy.
Scott - Your width is the same as mine is now, but the longeron height is 3" less...FWIW...
Gary
NX308MB
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 24, 2013, at 12:06 PM, "AircamperN11MS" wrote:
>
> I just measured mine yesterday. Tread width is 52" and the top of the longeron
is 49.5" .
>
> --------
> Scott Liefeld
> Flying N11MS since March 1972
> Steel Tube
> C-85-12
> Wire Wheels
> Brodhead in 1996
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403334#403334
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | Re: squirrelly on the gear |
From: | "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org> |
Gary, I think the tail wheel mod will correct your problem also. What the heck
is TWIW? My tail wheel fork is one from Vans. Non-swival. Works very well.
An RV-6 builder gave me mine and I adapted it to my airplane. I can take pics
next time I am at the airport. Maybe Friday?
--------
Scott Liefeld
Flying N11MS since March 1972
Steel Tube
C-85-12
Wire Wheels
Brodhead in 1996
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403339#403339
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | Re: squirrelly on the gear |
From: | "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org> |
FWIW ???
--------
Scott Liefeld
Flying N11MS since March 1972
Steel Tube
C-85-12
Wire Wheels
Brodhead in 1996
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403340#403340
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | Re: squirrelly on the gear |
From: | Gary Boothe <gboothe5(at)comcast.net> |
Right...corrected by I-phone!
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 24, 2013, at 1:14 PM, "AircamperN11MS" wrote:
>
> FWIW ???
>
> --------
> Scott Liefeld
> Flying N11MS since March 1972
> Steel Tube
> C-85-12
> Wire Wheels
> Brodhead in 1996
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403340#403340
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | Re: squirrelly on the gear |
From: | "Catdesigns" <Catdesigns(at)att.net> |
Scott
No need to take pictures. There ARE pictures of it on my website. Just say-en.......
http://www.westcoastpiet.com/images/Scott%20Liefeld/images/IMG_5515.JPG
Chris
--------
Chris
Sacramento, CA
WestCoastPiet.com
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403351#403351
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | Re: squirrelly on the gear |
From: | "Bill Church" <billspiet(at)sympatico.ca> |
That sure looks like a swivelling tailwheel to me.
But what do I know.
BC
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403357#403357
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | Re: squirrelly on the gear |
From: | Gary Boothe <gboothe5(at)comcast.net> |
There's a difference between metric swiveling and US Standard swiveling.
Gary
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 24, 2013, at 5:35 PM, "Bill Church" wrote:
>
> That sure looks like a swivelling tailwheel to me.
> But what do I know.
>
> BC
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403357#403357
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | Re: squirrelly on the gear |
From: | "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org> |
Hi Bill,
Gary is right. It is a special US Standard Non-swivel tailwheel fork. Really,
it is a non-swivel. I just have a lot of sag in my chains which allows it to
turn 90 degrees to either side. It works out very well for me and allows for
turning in tight areas even without brakes. Oh, no shimmies either. Come to
the west coast Piet gathering next year and I will demonstrate it for you.
Cheers,
--------
Scott Liefeld
Flying N11MS since March 1972
Steel Tube
C-85-12
Wire Wheels
Brodhead in 1996
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403387#403387
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | "Dortch, Steven D MAJ MIL USA NGB" <steven.d.dortch(at)us.army.mil> |
Subject: | Re: ELT requirement |
UNCLASSIFIED
I would really suggest getting the ELT that uses coppertop D cell batteries. They
can save you a significant amount of money over the years.
Blue Skies,
Steve D
On 06/24/13, "l.morlock" wrote:
>
> I ended up putting the ELT unit under the pilot's seat and the ground plane &
antenna just behind the pilot's seatback, similar to Jack's.
>
> Whether an ELT is required seems to be up to your individual DAR's interpretation
of the FAR. Mine said I am not conducting training, so I need an ELT regardless
of how close or far I am from the airport. Also, I tried to say it was
part of the design and testing of the aircraft, but no joy on that one either.
>
> I bought a new ELT from ACS for $199.. Had access to older ones, but by the time
I modified them and renewed batteries, it was about as cheap to get the new
one.
>
> Larry
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ben Charvet" <bencharvet(at)gmail.com>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 9:31 AM
> Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: ELT requirement
>
>
> >
> >The outdated 121.5 mhz Elts are still enough to make you legal, and are available
used for pretty cheap. I had the one I use given to me by someone that had
updated to the newer version. The 121.5 units don't really do much good. The
guy in the hangar next door set his off accidently while doing some maintenance,
and it went off for 5 days in his hangar before he was able to shut it off,
and nobody except us hangar bums even checked on it. I use a Spot GPS device
for safety.
> >
> >http://www.ebay.com/itm/Narco-ELT-10-System-w-Tray-and-Antenna-/370834214299?pt=Motors_Aviation_Parts_Gear&hash=item5657710d9b&vxp=mtr
> >
> >As Douwe said, you can spend your phase 1 time shopping and planning the installation.
> >
> >Ben Charvet
> >(coming to Brodhead by car)
> >
> >
> >On 6/18/2013 11:00 PM, Douwe Blumberg wrote:
> >>
> >>Hey Larry,
> >>
> >>You absolutely are NOT required to have an ELT installed during phase 1 flight
testing, if you do not carry a passenger (which you aren't really supposed
to anyways). You ARE required after phase 1 is complete. It is explained very
clearly in the FAR AIM.
> >>
> >>Douwe
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >Ben Charvet, PharmD
> >Staff Pharmacist
> >Parrish Medical center
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
UNCLASSIFIED
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | Re: ELT requirement |
From: | Marcus Zechini <marcus.zechini(at)gmail.com> |
Just went through conditional. The ELT installed in my Piet has the D
batteries. Yes, big money saver, I learned.
On Jun 25, 2013 10:15 AM, "Dortch, Steven D MAJ MIL USA NGB" <
steven.d.dortch(at)us.army.mil> wrote:
> steven.d.dortch(at)us.army.mil>
>
> UNCLASSIFIED
> I would really suggest getting the ELT that uses coppertop D cell
> batteries. They can save you a significant amount of money over the years.
>
> Blue Skies,
> Steve D
>
> On 06/24/13, "l.morlock" wrote:
> >
> > I ended up putting the ELT unit under the pilot's seat and the ground
> plane & antenna just behind the pilot's seatback, similar to Jack's.
> >
> > Whether an ELT is required seems to be up to your individual DAR's
> interpretation of the FAR. Mine said I am not conducting training, so I
> need an ELT regardless of how close or far I am from the airport. Also, I
> tried to say it was part of the design and testing of the aircraft, but no
> joy on that one either.
> >
> > I bought a new ELT from ACS for $199.. Had access to older ones, but by
> the time I modified them and renewed batteries, it was about as cheap to
> get the new one.
> >
> > Larry
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ben Charvet" <bencharvet(at)gmail.com>
> > To:
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 9:31 AM
> > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: ELT requirement
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >The outdated 121.5 mhz Elts are still enough to make you legal, and are
> available used for pretty cheap. I had the one I use given to me by someone
> that had updated to the newer version. The 121.5 units don't really do much
> good. The guy in the hangar next door set his off accidently while doing
> some maintenance, and it went off for 5 days in his hangar before he was
> able to shut it off, and nobody except us hangar bums even checked on it. I
> use a Spot GPS device for safety.
> > >
> > >
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/Narco-ELT-10-System-w-Tray-and-Antenna-/370834214299?pt=Motors_Aviation_Parts_Gear&hash=item5657710d9b&vxp=mtr
> > >
> > >As Douwe said, you can spend your phase 1 time shopping and planning
> the installation.
> > >
> > >Ben Charvet
> > >(coming to Brodhead by car)
> > >
> > >
> > >On 6/18/2013 11:00 PM, Douwe Blumberg wrote:
> douweblumberg(at)earthlink.net>
> > >>
> > >>Hey Larry,
> > >>
> > >>You absolutely are NOT required to have an ELT installed during phase
> 1 flight testing, if you do not carry a passenger (which you aren't really
> supposed to anyways). You ARE required after phase 1 is complete. It is
> explained very clearly in the FAR AIM.
> > >>
> > >>Douwe
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >Ben Charvet, PharmD
> > >Staff Pharmacist
> > >Parrish Medical center
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> UNCLASSIFIED
>
>
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | Re: What oil in a Corvair? |
From: | "tkreiner" <tkreiner(at)gmail.com> |
Could be I'm missing something here, but if your oil temps are running over 400F,
you probably have a problem; could that actually be 220?
--------
Tom Kreiner
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403421#403421
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | Re: What oil in a Corvair? |
From: | airlion2(at)gmail.com |
Tom. I am using rotella. 15 /40 and my temps are 220 to 240, cheers, gardiner
"
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 25, 2013, at 4:47 PM, "tkreiner" wrote:
>
> Could be I'm missing something here, but if your oil temps are running over 400F,
you probably have a problem; could that actually be 220?
>
> --------
> Tom Kreiner
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403421#403421
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | shad bell <aviatorbell(at)yahoo.com> |
Subject: | Re: What oil in a Corvair? |
oops sorry you are correct 250ish on hot days, good catch, I might have had a fire
at 450!
Shad
--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 6/25/13, airlion2(at)gmail.com wrote:
Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: What oil in a Corvair?
To: "pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com"
Date: Tuesday, June 25, 2013, 6:11 PM
--> Pietenpol-List message posted
by: airlion2(at)gmail.com
Tom. I am using rotella. 15 /40 and my temps are 220
to 240, cheers, gardiner
"
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 25, 2013, at 4:47 PM, "tkreiner"
wrote:
>
> Could be I'm missing something here, but if your oil
temps are running over 400F, you probably have a problem;
could that actually be 220?
>
> --------
> Tom Kreiner
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403421#403421
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Email Forum -
- MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
List Contribution Web Site -
-Matt
Dralle, List Admin.
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: | projects near Anchorage, AK |
From: | "stearmandriver" <pwr2800(at)gmail.com> |
Hello folks,
I will find myself in Anchorage starting tomorrow afternoon (Wednesday). I have
a two day layover and was hoping to meet someone working on their Pietenpol project
or any aircraft.
I understand how pathetic this sounds to some. When I'm not flying I am an airport
bum! Beats the heck out of golf!
Best Regards,
Dave Hughes
513 827-7474
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403445#403445
________________________________________________________________________________
From: | Gary Boothe <gboothe5(at)comcast.net> |
New spar, thanks to Jim Boyer, who refuses payment!
Gary
Sent from my iPhone