Pietenpol-Archive.digest.vol-oa

February 03, 2015 - February 24, 2015



Subject: Re: Sun-N-Fun 2015
From: Steven Dortch <steven.d.dortch(at)gmail.com>
Dick, are the Muk Tuks amphib or float? What will your empty weight go to? You know you get more weight allowance for LSA! 1,430 lbs for seaplanes! Be careful about exceeing VNE! 1930s air speed record setters were mostly float planes. While the floats were heavier they are much more aerodynamic. High HP engines and tiny fast wings liked having really long takeoff runs on water at a time when there were few long runways. I can hardly wait to see your duck fly. Blue Skies, Steve D On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Dick N wrote: > Steve > I am building the Muk Tuk floats. They are current technology. I looked > at the Flying Glider manual and thought about it for a couple of seconds, > but that was that. > Dick N. > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Steven Dortch > *To:* pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > *Sent:* Monday, February 02, 2015 2:20 PM > *Subject:* Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Sun-N-Fun 2015 > > One of the flying and Glider manuals has floats in it!. > > Blue Skies, > Steve D > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:35 PM, taildrags wrote: > >> >> Dick; >> >> Not sure if you mean that you have not fitted water rudders yet, or that >> you have some but they're not working out. In any case, note that there >> are some pretty good ones out there that the ocean kayaks use. >> Lightweight, strong, and retractable. Most ocean kayak rudders have quite >> a small area since they aren't designed for sharp, tight turns- but it's >> easy to add a larger blade to the stock rudder using some stainless >> hardware. >> >> Thanks for taking on the project in the first place. I've heard people >> ask about floats in the past, but you're the first that I know of who has >> actually undertaken the task. >> >> -------- >> Oscar Zuniga >> Medford, OR >> Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" >> A75 power >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=437949#437949 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ========== >> br> enpol-List" target="_blank"> >> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List >> ========== >> FORUMS - >> _blank">http://forums.matronics.com >> ========== >> b Site - >> -Matt Dralle, List Admin. >> target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> ========== >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Blue Skies, > Steve D > > * > > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List > href="http://forums.matronics.com ">http://forums.matronics.com > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution ">http://www.matronics.com/c > * > > * > > > * > > -- Blue Skies, Steve D ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Philips" <jack(at)bedfordlandings.com>
Subject: Propping planes, WARNING
Date: Feb 03, 2015
Thanks for posting, Scott. Sounds like he might have just wired the switch incorrectly. Hopefully the new switch will have a wiring diagram with it so he can wire it properly. I'm always amazed by the number of PILOTS who will walk up to my plane in the hangar and wiggle the prop. I always fuss at them, telling them they sure trust me to have the mags wired correctly and the p-leads intact. Jack Phillips NX899JP Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of AircamperN11MS Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2015 10:06 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Propping planes, WARNING --> Hello Fellow Pieters, I wanted to share an experience I had yesterday. Just a reminder to all who touch propellers whether they are propping the plane or not. A friend of mine who flys a Thorp T 18 was in the area and his plane was parked at my airport over the whole weekend. He does this a lot. Anyway, The battery was low due to the cold outside air temperatures all weekend. He managed to flood the engine while trying to start it. The engine was turning very slowly. So I asked if he would like me to pull it through several blades to clear the flooding before he tried to start it again. He said sure, please do. Oh yea, It has a metal prop hanging on an 0-360, 180HP and the nose of the plane is very low to the ground. Nough of that, OK, Switch off, throttle closed, mixture lean, master off, and a push on the plane to see if the brakes are holding. All was confirmed by the pilot. When I pulled through the 5th blade the engine started and ran for about 10 seconds then ran out of gas. It sure surprised the pilot. In fact, it scared him. It didn't scare me. I have had this happen to me more than one other time. I always assume that the engine will start anytime I put my hands on a blade. It can folks. I managed to talk the pilot into pushing the plane to my hangar so we can charge the battery and try to figure out why a mag was hot. Long story short. His mag switch was bad, (very bad). When the switch was in the both position, both mags were hot (good). When the switch was On the left mag, both mags were hot (not good). When the switch was on the right mag, the right mag was hot and the left mag was off (good). When the switch was in the off position, the right mag was still hot and the left mag was off (Very bad). This was why the plane started. Conclusion, I gave him a tip that I use before shut down. I will momentarily switch the mags to the off position to verify that the engine quits, then turn it back to the both position so the engine keeps running. Then I will shut down with the mixture control. If you have a problem with the mags not shutting off, this will tell you and you can get it fixed before someone gets hurt. We put the cowl back on and he flew home. He said he will be ordering a new switch from Spruce as soon as he got home. Be careful and prepared around all props everyone. Cheers, -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438007#438007 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 03, 2015
Subject: Propping planes, WARNING
From: Marcus Zechini <marcus.zechini(at)gmail.com>
My mag switch is an old A7 (from a T-6, maybe). Just before last annual, it was not grounding mags when I tried to stop the engine. Yes, it can happen, easy. I always consider them hot. On Feb 3, 2015 10:45 AM, "Jack Philips" wrote: > jack(at)bedfordlandings.com> > > Thanks for posting, Scott. > > Sounds like he might have just wired the switch incorrectly. Hopefully the > new switch will have a wiring diagram with it so he can wire it properly. > > I'm always amazed by the number of PILOTS who will walk up to my plane in > the hangar and wiggle the prop. I always fuss at them, telling them they > sure trust me to have the mags wired correctly and the p-leads intact. > > Jack Phillips > NX899JP > Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of > AircamperN11MS > Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2015 10:06 AM > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Propping planes, WARNING > > --> > > Hello Fellow Pieters, > > I wanted to share an experience I had yesterday. Just a reminder to all > who > touch propellers whether they are propping the plane or not. > > A friend of mine who flys a Thorp T 18 was in the area and his plane was > parked at my airport over the whole weekend. He does this a lot. Anyway, > The battery was low due to the cold outside air temperatures all weekend. > He managed to flood the engine while trying to start it. The engine was > turning very slowly. So I asked if he would like me to pull it through > several blades to clear the flooding before he tried to start it again. He > said sure, please do. Oh yea, It has a metal prop hanging on an 0-360, > 180HP and the nose of the plane is very low to the ground. Nough of that, > OK, Switch off, throttle closed, mixture lean, master off, and a push on > the > plane to see if the brakes are holding. All was confirmed by the pilot. > > When I pulled through the 5th blade the engine started and ran for about 10 > seconds then ran out of gas. It sure surprised the pilot. In fact, it > scared him. It didn't scare me. I have had this happen to me more than > one > other time. I always assume that the engine will start anytime I put my > hands on a blade. It can folks. > > I managed to talk the pilot into pushing the plane to my hangar so we can > charge the battery and try to figure out why a mag was hot. Long story > short. His mag switch was bad, (very bad). When the switch was in the > both > position, both mags were hot (good). When the switch was On the left mag, > both mags were hot (not good). When the switch was on the right mag, the > right mag was hot and the left mag was off (good). When the switch was in > the off position, the right mag was still hot and the left mag was off > (Very > bad). This was why the plane started. > > Conclusion, > I gave him a tip that I use before shut down. I will momentarily switch > the > mags to the off position to verify that the engine quits, then turn it back > to the both position so the engine keeps running. Then I will shut down > with the mixture control. If you have a problem with the mags not shutting > off, this will tell you and you can get it fixed before someone gets hurt. > We put the cowl back on and he flew home. He said he will be ordering a > new > switch from Spruce as soon as he got home. > > Be careful and prepared around all props everyone. > > Cheers, > > -------- > Scott Liefeld > Flying N11MS since March 1972 > Steel Tube > C-85-12 > Wire Wheels > Brodhead in 1996 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438007#438007 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Propping planes, WARNING
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Feb 03, 2015
Jack, The mags were wired correctly. The plane and the switch are 35 years old. In fact, the switch would not even return from the start position on its own. You have to return it to the both position. It was just flat worn out. -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438011#438011 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 03, 2015
Subject: Re: Propping planes, WARNING
From: Steven Dortch <steven.d.dortch(at)gmail.com>
Scott, when I started reading your email my heart rate increased. I am sure glad you were smart and diligent. I have been around two accidents involving touching a prop. None life or limb threatening, both caused significant damage. 1. Old Fellow was loading his Tripacer and somehow bumped the mag switch to on and pushed the throttle in. He then went around front to turn the prop to "Prime the Oil pump." When he turned the prop, it started! and went to High RPM. He dove out of the way, and the Tripacer started taxing and he grabbed a strut. The plane turned and hit a Cessna 182 with 3 people in it. The wing looked like JAWS had taken a bite out of it and, praise God, The prop stopped when it hit the cockpit.. Turns out the 182 pilot had been trained by the Tripacer pilot. Tripacer pilot was one of the very respected pilots in the area. 2. Several years later, different aiport but the same respected pilot now has a minicoupe (single seat, metal, low wing, VW engine). He walks around front to turn the prop to prime the engine. When he touches the prop, IT FIRES and goes to full throttle. He dives out of the way, the plane accellerates down the runway but about 20 degrees off runway heading. It lifts off but does not clear the barbed wire (BOB war in West Texas) and crashes on the railroad tracks. We all ran over and drug the plane off the tracks. He quit flying. Too bad he was a great guy and really a good pilot in other ways. Rules about hand propping: I learned from the Fort Eustis and Langely AFB flying clubs: All Club members MUST take the handprop class before handpropping anything. A 15 min class on the Piper cub. Treat all props as HOT, All the time. Touch them in such a way that you are out of the way WHEN it fires. Don't handprop a plane that has a starter. Get it fixed! Make sure the mags are off if you are just turning the prop. Touch it like it is a rattlesnake and will bite you. Just wrap the tips of your fingers around the blade. Don't grip it. Don't wear loose floppy clothes that can catch in the prop. Nothing in your shirt pocket that might fall out. It is best to take your hat, and sunglasses off and put them in the plane. Tf someone is in the plane, and they say the plane is "COLD" then both hands should be visible before you touch the prop. Still treat the prop like it is HOT! Only a pilot should touch the controls, NEVER a non pilot. Beware leaving a nonpilot in the plane while you prop.They WILL touch something you don't want them to. Chock and tie the plane down. When you start handpropping, all motions should move your body away from the prop. You should be backing away from the prop when it spins. These are not in order, but I always consider them. Blue Skies, Steve D ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-LME0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Subject: hot ignition system, propping
Date: Feb 03, 2015
R2xhZCB5b3UgZGlkbuKAmXQgZ2V0IGh1cnQgU2NvdHQgYW5kIHRoYW5rIHlvdSBmb3IgcmVsYXlp bmcgeW91ciBleHBlcmllbmNlIHRvIHVzIG9uIHRoZSBsaXN0Lg0KDQpGb3IgdGhvc2Ugb2YgdXMg d2hvIGRvbuKAmXQgaGF2ZSBtaXh0dXJlIGNvbnRyb2xzIHRvIHNodXRvZmYgb3VyIGVuZ2luZXMs IHdoYXQgSSBkbyBpcyBkdXJpbmcgc2h1dGRvd24gYXQgaWRsZSBzd2l0Y2ggdG8gdGhlIHJpZ2h0 IG9ubHksDQp0aGUgbGVmdCBvbmx5LCBhbmQgdGhlIGVuZ2luZSB3aWxsIHN0YXkgcnVubmluZyBv biBlaXRoZXIgbWFnIGJ1dCB0aGUgTCBtYWcgcnVucyBhIGxpdHRsZSByb3VnaGVyIHNpbmNlIHRo ZSBBLTY1IHVzZXMgdGhlIEwgbWFnIHRvIGZpcmUNCnRoZSBib3R0b20gKHVzdWFsbHkgYSBiaXQg bW9yZSBjYXJib24vb2lseSB0aGFuIHRoZSB0b3AgcGx1Z3MpIGFuZCB0aGVuIHRvIHRoZSBPRkYg cG9zaXRpb24uICAgSWYgZWl0aGVyIG1hZyBpcyBzdGlsbCBob3QgaW4gdGhlIG9mZiBwb3NpdGlv bg0KdGhlIGVuZ2luZSB3aWxsIHN0aWxsIHJ1buKAlG5vdCBnb29kLg0KDQpNaWtlIEMuDQpPaGlv DQoNCg0K ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Propping planes, WARNING
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Feb 03, 2015
Steve, When I was a kid I saw a guy loose his arm while propping a small homebuilt. I guess the image has stuck with me. All your points should be taken seriously by all pilots. If you are not properly trained, then stay away from the big nasty man eating propeller. Rattlesnake? Yes. I just wanted to share the story. I didn't mean to raise your heart rate but maybe that's a good thing. I wanted to just remind folks that what we do can bite you if you are not prepared. -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438015#438015 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kip Gmail <kipgohio1957(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Propping planes, WARNING
Date: Feb 03, 2015
I treat props the way I treat chain saws - they should always be treated as dangerous as soon as someone puts their hands on them. Kip Gardner On Feb 3, 2015, at 11:35 AM, AircamperN11MS wrote: > > > > Steve, > > When I was a kid I saw a guy loose his arm while propping a small > homebuilt. I guess the image has stuck with me. All your points > should be taken seriously by all pilots. If you are not properly > trained, then stay away from the big nasty man eating propeller. > > Rattlesnake? Yes. > > I just wanted to share the story. I didn't mean to raise your heart > rate but maybe that's a good thing. I wanted to just remind folks > that what we do can bite you if you are not prepared. > > -------- > Scott Liefeld > Flying N11MS since March 1972 > Steel Tube > C-85-12 > Wire Wheels > Brodhead in 1996 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438015#438015 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Propping planes, WARNING
From: "tkreiner" <tkreiner(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 03, 2015
First lesson I learned when my Dad took me to airport for my first flight - maybe I was around 6 or 7. As we approached the plane, my Dad said, "Never touch a prop." When I asked him why, the answer was, "The engine might start, and you can get hurt bad or killed." I've told exactly this to my own children, and to non-pilots when I take them to the field. We should all do the same... Thanks for the reminder! -------- Tom Kreiner Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438017#438017 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: hot ignition system, propping
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Feb 03, 2015
Thanks Mike, Funny thing, When doing the mag check there was no drop on the left and 150 drop on the right. One would think that the left mag was in really great shape with no drop. But to my surprise the right mag was still running in the left position. Hence, no mag drop. I always seem to learn something when at the airport. -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438018#438018 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dick N" <horzpool(at)goldengate.net>
Subject: Re: Sun-N-Fun 2015
Date: Feb 03, 2015
They are simple Floats, no idea about empty weight. When it's all done I will bring it to SNF on Fuse. with wings. Thanks for the info, I did know about the weight thing. Dick N. ----- Original Message ----- From: Steven Dortch To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 9:30 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Sun-N-Fun 2015 Dick, are the Muk Tuks amphib or float? What will your empty weight go to? You know you get more weight allowance for LSA! 1,430 lbs for seaplanes! Be careful about exceeing VNE! 1930s air speed record setters were mostly float planes. While the floats were heavier they are much more aerodynamic. High HP engines and tiny fast wings liked having really long takeoff runs on water at a time when there were few long runways. I can hardly wait to see your duck fly. Blue Skies, Steve D On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Dick N wrote: Steve I am building the Muk Tuk floats. They are current technology. I looked at the Flying Glider manual and thought about it for a couple of seconds, but that was that. Dick N. ----- Original Message ----- From: Steven Dortch To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 2:20 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Sun-N-Fun 2015 One of the flying and Glider manuals has floats in it!. Blue Skies, Steve D On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:35 PM, taildrags wrote: Dick; Not sure if you mean that you have not fitted water rudders yet, or that you have some but they're not working out. In any case, note that there are some pretty good ones out there that the ocean kayaks use. Lightweight, strong, and retractable. Most ocean kayak rudders have quite a small area since they aren't designed for sharp, tight turns- but it's easy to add a larger blade to the stock rudder using some stainless hardware. Thanks for taking on the project in the first place. I've heard people ask about floats in the past, but you're the first that I know of who has actually undertaken the task. -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=437949#437949 ========== br> enpol-List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List ========== FORUMS - _blank">http://forums.matronics.com ========== b Site - -Matt Dralle, List Admin. target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution ========== -- Blue Skies, Steve D href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution -- Blue Skies, Steve D ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 03, 2015
Subject: Re: Propping planes, WARNING
From: Steven Dortch <steven.d.dortch(at)gmail.com>
My kids hear the same thing. Also as a Skydiver we never let anyone go in front of the Wing. When I take people out to a plane, I tell them they will be safe if they don't go in front of the wing. Oh and never touch the prop. One additonal thing. The idea of taking your hat off. People have their hats blow off and go into the prop. Instinctively they reach for it! Not a good idea. Blue Skies, Steve D On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:58 AM, tkreiner wrote: > > First lesson I learned when my Dad took me to airport for my first flight > - maybe I was around 6 or 7. > > As we approached the plane, my Dad said, "Never touch a prop." > > When I asked him why, the answer was, "The engine might start, and you can > get hurt bad or killed." > > I've told exactly this to my own children, and to non-pilots when I take > them to the field. > > We should all do the same... > > Thanks for the reminder! > > -------- > Tom Kreiner > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438017#438017 > > -- Blue Skies, Steve D ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Cold Weather Piet
From: "Bill Church" <billspiet(at)sympatico.ca>
Date: Feb 03, 2015
Ever wondered what a Pietenpol might look like with an enclosed canopy? There's one listed on Kijiji for sale in Nova Scotia: http://www.kijiji.ca/v-cars-other/city-of-halifax/aircraft/1045355367?enableSearchNavigationFlag=true Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438025#438025 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/piet_canopy_985.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Cold Weather Piet
Date: Feb 03, 2015
They need bigger rudders in Nova Scotia. Gary Boothe NX308MB -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Church Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 1:01 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Cold Weather Piet --> Ever wondered what a Pietenpol might look like with an enclosed canopy? There's one listed on Kijiji for sale in Nova Scotia: http://www.kijiji.ca/v-cars-other/city-of-halifax/aircraft/1045355367?enable SearchNavigationFlag=true Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438025#438025 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/piet_canopy_985.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robert Gow <rgow(at)avionicsdesign.ca>
Subject: Cold Weather Piet
Date: Feb 03, 2015
I always wondered how a cabin version of the piet would look. Like a Robin perhaps. Robert Gow, President and DAO Manager. Avionics Design Services Ltd. Phn 705-527-6095 Cell 416-434-3393 Fax 705-527-6028 www.avionicsdesign.ca <http://www.avionicsdesign.ca/> -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Gary Boothe Sent: February 3, 2015 4:33 PM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Cold Weather Piet --> They need bigger rudders in Nova Scotia. Gary Boothe NX308MB -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Church Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 1:01 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Cold Weather Piet --> Ever wondered what a Pietenpol might look like with an enclosed canopy? There's one listed on Kijiji for sale in Nova Scotia: http://www.kijiji.ca/v-cars-other/city-of-halifax/aircraft/1045355367?enab le SearchNavigationFlag=true Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438025#438025 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/piet_canopy_985.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Cold Weather Piet
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Feb 03, 2015
Yep, looks like a big rudder Gary. I think it could be classified as a flipper cause it is apparently cold and wet up there. How do you get into the thing. I don't see any slides on the rear canopy, and the front??? Maybe you remove it then put it back on after you get the victim loaded. I mean passenger. Any guesses anyone???????????? -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438029#438029 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Cold Weather Piet
From: "tools" <n0kkj(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Feb 03, 2015
I always thought enclosing open cockpit airplanes was just plane dumb... until I got an open cockpit airplane! Still probably not for me, but I get it now. My guess is they flip to the side. The front one couldn't slide anyway. Given the curvature, and where the pivot would be, don't think it would get taller as it flips over, so should work up under the wing even though there isn't much clearance. Would be easy to remove for nice weather as well. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438030#438030 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Propping planes, WARNING
From: "tools" <n0kkj(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Feb 03, 2015
So there I was.... Just a few weeks ago, haven't been up in the Piet in a couple months. It was cold, so wasn't planning on going flying, thought I'd start it up, warm up the oil, etc. Not in a hurry, no onlookers distracting me. Just wanted to blow out some cobwebs, which I could do right in the hangar, where it was (thankfully...) tied down three points. Check throttle back, carb heat off, switches off. Pull it through ten or so times, give it time to gas off in the cylinders. Go back around, throttle back, carb heat off, switches on. Clothing correct, nothing sitting around in the way... I really feel relaxed and on my game. First pull almost starts, but seems to flood itself instead. Half a dozen pulls later, decide to clear it out. I've always figured this was the most dangerous of things to do hand propping, so really going slow now... Throttle open full, carb heat off, switches off. Still careful to assume it could start, pull it though a dozen times backwards. Back to the cockpit, carb heat off, switches on. Pull it through, surprised it didn't start... took a deep breath, went back to the cockpit and pulled the throttle back...! D'oh! Tied down, still, REALLY happy it didn't start up on me. Man, NOTHING was distracting me. Not in a hurry at all, wasn't even going flying. Still missed it. When it's out of the hangar, I always tie off one wheel when I start it, and try to park in a depression, up against concrete, push it off concrete if I can, etc. From now on, tieing off both wheels. There's just nothing about flying these things you can take for granted. Not a single little thing. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438032#438032 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-LME0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Subject: flooded starts---, WARNING
Date: Feb 03, 2015
Mike Danforth's post (Tools) below was an EXCELLENT reminder of how scary this stuff can be, even when we are not distracted as he describes below! This is a really good post---thank you for sharing this and if it hasn't happened to us, it just might even when you least expect it. What Mike describes below happens to the little Continentals from time to t ime and his procedure for clearing out the carb is exactly what I was taught and it works but it is really the time (especially when alone) w hen you want the plane tied down, for sure. I end up tying the tail of my plane to the tow hitch on my Ford Explorer wh en I have to do this clearing procedure or find a tie-down ring on the ramp and even then I'm operating in a 'holy moly' mindset. So glad this story turned out well and thank you for sharing it. Mike C. Ohio PS-let me tell you about the first year I went to Oshkosh with my plane. I had it ALL packed, ready to go. Full fuel, full oil, charts ready, everything was perfect including the weather. I start the airplane, taxi out and stop to do all my pretakeoff checks. I advance the throttle, check left mag, check right mag......1800 rpm....carb heat on and the engin e STOPS cold. Mr. Oshkosh-bound forgot to turn on the fuel. Thank God I didn't just throttle up and go because I would have had the eng ine STOP on climb out over the trees and wires! @yahoo.com>> So there I was.... Just a few weeks ago, haven't been up in the Piet in a couple months. It w as cold, so wasn't planning on going flying, thought I'd start it up, warm up the oil, etc. Not in a hurry, no onlookers distracting me. Just wanted to blow out some cobwebs, which I could do right in the hangar, where it was (thankfully...) tied down three points. Check throttle back, carb heat off, switches off. Pull it through ten or s o times, give it time to gas off in the cylinders. Go back around, throttl e back, carb heat off, switches on. Clothing correct, nothing sitting around in the way... I really feel relaxe d and on my game. First pull almost starts, but seems to flood itself inst ead. Half a dozen pulls later, decide to clear it out. I've always figured this was the most dangerous of things to do hand proppi ng, so really going slow now... Throttle open full, carb heat off, switches off. Still careful to assume it could start, pull it though a dozen times backwards. Back to the cockpit, carb heat off, switches on. Pull it through, surprise d it didn't start... took a deep breath, went back to the cockpit and pulle d the throttle back...! D'oh! Tied down, still, REALLY happy it didn't start up on me. Man, NOTHING was distracting me. Not in a hurry at all, wasn't even going flying. Still missed it. When it's out of the hangar, I always tie off one wheel when I start it, an d try to park in a depression, up against concrete, push it off concrete if I can, etc. From now on, tieing off both wheels. There's just nothing about flying these things you can take for granted. N ot a single little thing. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438032#438032 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dick N" <horzpool(at)goldengate.net>
Subject: Re: Propping planes, WARNING
Date: Feb 03, 2015
Hey Tools, All that stuff you checked but you didnt say anything about washing the wings down, just a thought. Dick N. ----- Original Message ----- From: "tools" <n0kkj(at)yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 4:52 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Propping planes, WARNING > > So there I was.... > > Just a few weeks ago, haven't been up in the Piet in a couple months. It > was cold, so wasn't planning on going flying, thought I'd start it up, > warm up the oil, etc. > > Not in a hurry, no onlookers distracting me. Just wanted to blow out some > cobwebs, which I could do right in the hangar, where it was > (thankfully...) tied down three points. > > Check throttle back, carb heat off, switches off. Pull it through ten or > so times, give it time to gas off in the cylinders. Go back around, > throttle back, carb heat off, switches on. > > Clothing correct, nothing sitting around in the way... I really feel > relaxed and on my game. First pull almost starts, but seems to flood > itself instead. Half a dozen pulls later, decide to clear it out. > > I've always figured this was the most dangerous of things to do hand > propping, so really going slow now... Throttle open full, carb heat off, > switches off. Still careful to assume it could start, pull it though a > dozen times backwards. > > Back to the cockpit, carb heat off, switches on. Pull it through, > surprised it didn't start... took a deep breath, went back to the cockpit > and pulled the throttle back...! D'oh! > > Tied down, still, REALLY happy it didn't start up on me. > > Man, NOTHING was distracting me. Not in a hurry at all, wasn't even going > flying. Still missed it. > > When it's out of the hangar, I always tie off one wheel when I start it, > and try to park in a depression, up against concrete, push it off concrete > if I can, etc. From now on, tieing off both wheels. > > There's just nothing about flying these things you can take for granted. > Not a single little thing. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438032#438032 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: John Letkeman <pilot(at)fehrs.com>
Subject: Re: New Pietenpol Aircamper owner
Date: Feb 04, 2015
Thanks Steve, I will keep you posted of any flights to your area. John Sent from my iPad On Feb 3, 2015, at 7:45 AM, Steven Dortch > wrote: John, No need for a rental car. I live about 10 min from both San Antonio I nternational and Stinson (the GA reliever, and second oldest General Aviati on airport in the US, est 1915) From either of these it is 40 min to San Ge ronimo where my plane is. I will haul you around, I just mentioned it for planning purposes. I work u ntil about 3PM most weekdays. Give me some forwarning and I will let you see my project. PS I have heard that "Der Faker Fokker" a highly modified Piet is at the Ai r museum at Stinson. On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:31 PM, John Letkeman > wrote: Thanks Steve! I may take you up on that, I could just jump in a rental car, do you have any pictures of your Piet on this forum? John Sent from my iPad On Feb 1, 2015, at 9:09 AM, Steven Dortch > wrote: Yes, I am smack dab in the middle. I live on Fort Sam Houston. with some warning I could haul you out to look over my project. Note it tak es 40 min to get there from almost any airport. Steve D On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 8:56 AM, John Letkeman @fehrs.com>> wrote: 90% done 50% to go! So true! I have spent a lot of time measuring parts and looking at the plans already! Are you in the San Antonio area? I fly my boss there occasionally. John Sent from my iPad On Jan 31, 2015, at 10:10 PM, Steven Dortch > wrote: John, It looks 90% complete. That means there is only 50% to go! Seriously, Don't be surprised if you spend some time figuring out why or ho w the last builder did something. I spend a lot of time doing just that. If you can't find a local Pietenpol or even (Heaven forbid) Grega, look aro und for someone who has built a Bowers Flybaby. While very different in man y ways (low wing, single seat), there are a lot of building similarities (W ood frame, cloth, A65) One of my problem solving mentors built a fly baby. He is full of informati on. He also gets me to simplify my sometimes overly complex thoughts. IE, " Rather than custom machining a mount, why don't you just burn a hole in the fabric and turn the bolt around!" "Use one long screw instead of two short ones." He really wants me to get my plane flying because, "no one else fl ies as slow as I do." Oscar also helped me by getting me to write down everything I thought I wan ted to do. Then he had me do a shorter list of everything that had to be do ne to fly safely. Work off of that list first, then later you can add bells and whistles (or guns and bombs and smoke, and horns that play songs) Blue Skies, Steve D On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 3:40 PM, John Letkeman > wrote: :pilot(at)fehrs.com>> Oscar, Although I've been flying for 15 years, I'm pretty new to experimental airc raft, I've been interested in the Pietenpol for as long as I've been flying, I ne ed too research the FAR's And find out what the steps are too getting N-# and airworthiness certifica te, I'm ok with not getting repairman certificate, is Raymond Hanover on th is forum? I would like too visit with him, He's only about a two hour flight in the C170. Thanks John Sent from my iPad > On Jan 30, 2015, at 6:38 AM, taildrags > wrote: > mailto:taildrags(at)hotmail.com>> > > John; there's nothing wrong with you being the builder... the FARs just s ay that the airplane has be be amateur-built but it doesn't say you have to be the only builder. My Piet and most others have been through several ha nds before being completed by the second, third, or more builders. What yo u're probably saying is that you probably will not qualify to get the repai rman's certificate for it. That would permit you to do your own condition inspections on it, and for that you have to convince your DAR that you've d one enough of the work on it that you're so familiar with it that you can i nspect it. With the wings and fuselage covered and painted, I don't think you have much hope of getting that cert. > > You do have a nearby neighbor (nearby, if measured by Texas standards)- R aymond Hanover is up in Skellytown and is in test flights with his Corvair- powered GN-1. > > -------- > Oscar Zuniga > Medford, OR > Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" > A75 power > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=437857#437857 > > br> enpol-List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pieten pol-List FORUMS - _blank">http://forums.matronics.com b Site - -Matt Dralle, List Admin. target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution -- Blue Skies, Steve D ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List ics.com<http://ics.com> .matronics.com/contribution<http://matronics.com/contribution> " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List tp://forums.matronics.com<http://forums.matronics.com> _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution -- Blue Skies, Steve D ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List ics.com<http://ics.com> .matronics.com/contribution<http://matronics.com/contribution> " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution -- Blue Skies, Steve D ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: flooded starts---, WARNING
From: "tools" <n0kkj(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Feb 03, 2015
Hehe, uh, ya, it was my pleasure to reveal my... you get the idea! We actually had a formal name for this sort of thing in Navy safety training called true confessions. We set aside about a half hour every safety stand down and folks just fessed up. No harm, no foul... was VERY beneficial. Which reminds me... so there I ALMOST was... I don't turn off the fuel shutoffs in my plane. I can't remember exactly how it happened, but after a ride, maybe letting someone else fly, something, I caught someone ELSE turning off the shutoff. I'm not sure how many times I've flown without REALLY checking those things. There but by the grace of God go I... At work, I don't hit the head without reading a check list out loud. Hey, this Piet doesn't have flaps, mixture, prop, gear... why would I need a checklist... geesh... I, too, LOVE these discussions. ESPECIALLY when it's just a close call. Nonetheless, talking about ANY learning experience helps the collective consciousness. Tools Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438036#438036 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Propping planes, WARNING
From: "tools" <n0kkj(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Feb 03, 2015
We did! BUT, there's always a but, the birds are still there. Need to get that danged hangar finished up and the birds out. She's flying great though. Need to stop by on the way south to SnF and say hi to her... pretty sure she misses you! Tools Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438037#438037 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 03, 2015
Subject: Re: Cold Weather Piet
From: Steven Dortch <steven.d.dortch(at)gmail.com>
My guess is a hinge on the side. A buddy's Flybaby has a canopy like this. He uses it for the extreme cold weather here in South Texas. Blue Skies, Steve D On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:18 PM, AircamperN11MS wrote: > Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org> > > Yep, looks like a big rudder Gary. I think it could be classified as a > flipper cause it is apparently cold and wet up there. How do you get into > the thing. I don't see any slides on the rear canopy, and the front??? > Maybe you remove it then put it back on after you get the victim loaded. I > mean passenger. > > Any guesses anyone???????????? > > -------- > Scott Liefeld > Flying N11MS since March 1972 > Steel Tube > C-85-12 > Wire Wheels > Brodhead in 1996 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438029#438029 > > -- Blue Skies, Steve D ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ray Krause <raykrause(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: Cold Weather Piet
Date: Feb 03, 2015
A long ferry flight to CA! Ray Krause Sent from my iPad > On Feb 3, 2015, at 1:00 PM, Bill Church wrote: > > > Ever wondered what a Pietenpol might look like with an enclosed canopy? > There's one listed on Kijiji for sale in Nova Scotia: > http://www.kijiji.ca/v-cars-other/city-of-halifax/aircraft/1045355367?enableSearchNavigationFlag=true > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438025#438025 > > > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/piet_canopy_985.jpg > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Turtledeck
From: Scott Knowlton <flyingscott_k(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 04, 2015
I didn't know how I was going to finish the aft end of the turtledeck where i t abuts the horizontal stab. 3 bucks worth of balsa, a little fun sanding a nd shaping and a piece of 1/16 ply did the trick. A nice shop morning befor e heading off to work. The bolt secures my hard point for the shoulder harnesses. Scott Knowlton. Burlington ON. Sent from my iPhone ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Philips" <jack(at)bedfordlandings.com>
Subject: Turtledeck
Date: Feb 04, 2015
Nice job, Scott! Jack Phillips NX899JP Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Scott Knowlton Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2015 10:20 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Turtledeck I didn't know how I was going to finish the aft end of the turtledeck where it abuts the horizontal stab. 3 bucks worth of balsa, a little fun sanding and shaping and a piece of 1/16 ply did the trick. A nice shop morning before heading off to work. The bolt secures my hard point for the shoulder harnesses. Scott Knowlton. Burlington ON. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Turtledeck
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Feb 04, 2015
That's slick. Nice touch. -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438044#438044 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Cold Weather Piet
From: "Bill Church" <billspiet(at)sympatico.ca>
Date: Feb 04, 2015
Looking at the other photos from the Kijiji ad, it looks like the front canopy has a hinge on the top, right down the center. And the rear canopy has a slot cut into the back edge, like it would need to clear the antenna, if it was designed to slide back. However, there doesn't appear to be a track to slide on, so not sure how that might work. BC Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438045#438045 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/canopies_181.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Cold Weather Piet
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Feb 04, 2015
Interesting thoughts everyone. The front pit is just hard to get into without the canopy. Perhaps the owner or someone near him has the answer. I'm sure it is easy once explained. -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438046#438046 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Cold Weather Piet
From: "tools" <n0kkj(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Feb 04, 2015
So many ways to skin a cat... The back one doesn't need a track to come back, and the antenna would keep it from coming all the way out... Getting in the front like that though, wow. Could be a bifold mechanism. Any of the MN crowd working on a solution?! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438050#438050 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Hot Mag Fatality.
From: "William Wynne" <WilliamTCA(at)aol.com>
Date: Feb 04, 2015
I would normaly just tack the thought onto the bottom of the other thread, but Gary Collins was a very good man, and for that reason maybe another thread is in order. Gary was part of the Corvair world, as he built a Corvair powered Carlson Saprrow II. He was at Many Corvair Colleges, and part of the tight knit world of Ohio homebuilding. He had many planes over the years, many people remember his C-170. He also owned an 0-320 powered Tailwind, and last year, while working on it in his hangar, not trying to start it, just working on it, it killed him. There are some notes here http://flycorvair.net/2014/03/08/aircraft-wiring-101/. He was a very careful man, and I can say this because I see how people work at Colleges, and 30 minutes there is a better indicator than 10 years of talking around the campfire. I want to be very clear that I am in no way suggesting that I know what was wrong with his plane, or even if there was anything wrong. He was working alone and was not found for hours, it took several days in the hospital for him to die. I bring this up because frequently new people think these warnings are an anachronism, something to do with barnstorming. They are not, and perhaps a real name, and a personal tragedy provide some awareness. The story above had link to his photos on his FB page, but it has been taken down. Look at his image, he is in the white shirt, 2nd photo down here: http://flycorvair.net/2012/04/07/sun-n-fun-2012/ Some thoughts: Don't just try to shut the plane off with the mag switch. Every now and then try wiggling the key in the switch. Many mag switches pass the test, but if you jiggle the key and torment it a little, they fail. Many people put a lot of keys on their key ring, it is a bad idea, the weight bothers the switch. Try reaching behind the panel and wiggling the wiring also. Never get a used mag switch from anybody. They sell them in flymarts. I watched a guy take a bad one out of a C-120 and put it on the shelf. I suggested he just smash it with a hammer and toss it out, he didn't I am sure it went to a flymart. The switch is no better than the crimps on the wires, and I have seen countless shitty chimps on homebuit P leads. This is like having a firearm with a broken safety. Dan Weseman and I once walked around our airport looking at mag wiring on RV's. 20% of the ones owned by 2nd owners had the L R backwards. Demonstrates that people were careless with a very critical system 50% of the planes were wired with wire and crimps I would deem inadequate for installing an 8-track in a '74 Pinto. Even with this said, the least reliable component of the system is the human. I watch people around planes very carefully, because I do not like doing anything with distracted idiots present. I watch people preflight planes and pull them out while speaking on cell phones. They are idiots, and Darwin and statistics will get them. Just make sure you are not collateral damage when their bill comes due. Grace was good friends with Canadian aviator Ray Fiset, who spent the last 50 years of his life in a wheel chair, as a reward for stopping a moron from walking into a prop and ended up getting it by it himself. http://www.eaa.ca/bitsandpieces/articles/2011-11_Editorial.asp There have always been stupid people, but prescription drugs and cell phones have made the problem more acute. Read rays story, and see that he died working because a scam artist stole his life savings, slowly accumulated over decades of living frugally in a wheelchair. They sent the scam guy to jail, but in a just world, they should have executed him. I spent many hours in Ray's company, he was a great human being. I can't find words to express this adequately. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438051#438051 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Hot Mag Fatality.
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Feb 05, 2015
William, As a tech counselor for EAA the past 20 years or so I run across a few planes that folks have botched up the wiring as described by you. Most guys will listen and make the correct changes. There are very few that won't. I live in an area that is full of aerospace employees of all trades. They work at places like Northrup, Lockheed, NASA and the Air force. The list goes on and on. Mechanics, Pilots, Test Pilots, Engineers of all sorts. These guys have seen what can happen if things are not done correctly. The guys around here are very sharp and do all the right things to make their plane very safe. It makes my Tech visits very pleasurable. All your points are very valid and I am glad you shared them. Most all of us with Piets hand prop our planes. We get very comfortable around our own planes. We can hear them talking to us and they tell us when they are ready to run, or if we have a low cylinder. All kinds of stuff. I just wanted to share my story with everyone to remind them that what we do can hurt you, and to always be prepared for that engine to fire up anytime you are around that prop. We all have our stories. Thank you for sharing yours. I have found that if I can learn from mistakes others have made before me, that perhaps I'll live longer. Now lets go flying everyone. It's over 70 degrees here in So. California. Happy landings, -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438091#438091 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 05, 2015
Subject: Re: Hot Mag Fatality.
From: Marcus Zechini <marcus.zechini(at)gmail.com>
Scott, went out after work, here in northern VA, as it was 54 degrees. Can you weigh in on the practice of going backwards a few blades? I see that compression & impulse mags could override one's perceived safety in that endeavor. On Feb 5, 2015 3:09 PM, "AircamperN11MS" wrote: > Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org> > > William, > > As a tech counselor for EAA the past 20 years or so I run across a few > planes that folks have botched up the wiring as described by you. Most > guys will listen and make the correct changes. There are very few that > won't. I live in an area that is full of aerospace employees of all > trades. They work at places like Northrup, Lockheed, NASA and the Air > force. The list goes on and on. Mechanics, Pilots, Test Pilots, Engineers > of all sorts. These guys have seen what can happen if things are not done > correctly. The guys around here are very sharp and do all the right things > to make their plane very safe. It makes my Tech visits very pleasurable. > > All your points are very valid and I am glad you shared them. Most all of > us with Piets hand prop our planes. We get very comfortable around our own > planes. We can hear them talking to us and they tell us when they are ready > to run, or if we have a low cylinder. All kinds of stuff. > > I just wanted to share my story with everyone to remind them that what we > do can hurt you, and to always be prepared for that engine to fire up > anytime you are around that prop. > > We all have our stories. Thank you for sharing yours. I have found that > if I can learn from mistakes others have made before me, that perhaps I'll > live longer. > > Now lets go flying everyone. It's over 70 degrees here in So. California. > > Happy landings, > > -------- > Scott Liefeld > Flying N11MS since March 1972 > Steel Tube > C-85-12 > Wire Wheels > Brodhead in 1996 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438091#438091 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Hot Mag Fatality.
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Feb 05, 2015
Marcus, I never turn my engine backwards. I used to do that but have found a better way of clearing a flooded Cont. engine. To answer your question. Once the coil in the Magneto is charged it can fire and hurt you if the mags are not grounded. When the points break then you will get a spark to the plugs no mater which direction you turn the engine. By turning the engine backwards you are also pushing all the oil from the oil pump back into the oil tank. I need to run to a meeting right now. More later if you want. -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438093#438093 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Notes for new handprop builders
From: "William Wynne" <WilliamTCA(at)aol.com>
Date: Feb 05, 2015
Most old School guys will know this stuff, but here are Some resources for people new to hand propping: ( I ask forgiveness in advance if the overlaps the previous posts of others) . Below are a few links that may help builders looking a Continental options. I actually have more flight hours behind Centennials that I do behind Corvairs. I like everything about Centennials except for the new owners.My wife Grace has owned a C-85 powered BC-12D for 16 years. To make it easier for her to use solo, it is set up with a total loss starting system that doesn't weigh much. A few years ago we set it up to tow our single seat 1954 Schweitzer 1-26 glider. Along the way we picked up some info that might be of use to a new Piet guy. This story is kind of a companion piece to one I wrote on July 6th called "Carbs, mags and Certified engines." It should be here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?t=104226&highlight=mags+wynne+navion . Grace's plane is set up with a tow hook on the tail spring. Because it is certified, we used a very expensive Schweitzer hook, (they are $500-$1000 used) You can buy the mechanically identical item from these people: http://www.wingsunlimitedtowhooks.com/ for Experimentals.for half that. You could make your own, but it is something you will be trusting your life to. If I was building a hand prop plane, it would have one of these. They weigh about a pound. Start the plane and get in with it tied down solo, and then pull the cockpit cable and go. A few lengths of disposable nylon rope in the glove box, and you can stop for lunch somewhere and just leave the nylon rope behind. Vastly better than any kind of wheel chocks for propping. . Funny story: Friend of ours who is a well known aviation journalist totaled a PZL Wilga in a landing accident he was very embarrassed of. Years later he is hand propping a Varga with a dead battery. It jumps the chocks, drives across a large airport and makes a very successful unmanned strike on a tied down Mooney. After finding that no one was hurt, the man feels horrible realizing that he has now destroyed three aircraft in his career. His friends console him on email by pointing out that he only has two more to destroy before his is an "Ace." . Critical to flying a hand prop plane is a carb that will ALWAYS idle Too many people are taught to fly power on approaches, which most old school instructors consider very poor form and potentially dangerous behavior in a hand prop plane. If you try this, and a hand prop plane quits on final, they might name the overrun in your memory. Key here is having a 1st class carb. I would not fly an experimental carb on a hand prop plane, particularly not with a pilot taught to fly power on approaches. It is a bad combination To read up on carbs, there are a dozen stories here: http://flycorvair.net/2013/12/03/carburetor-reference-page/ Look at Strombergs and MA3's. Do not be temped to using something like a posa or an aerocarb. . On the topic of flying approaches, if you don't own and understand this book: http://flycorvair.net/2013/05/25/greatest-book-on-flying-ever-written-is-your-life-worth-16/ do yourself a very big favor, buy it read it, study it, and really know it. It was written 71 years ago about real Airmanship, it is period correct for Pietenpols. If you would like to make the engine easier to hand prop, help the CG, and noticeably improve the performance of the plane, look at a metal prop. I switched from a Wood Sensenich 72-48 to this model prop on the Taylorcraft when we set it up for the glider: http://www.barnstormers.com/classified_982818_McCauley+Prop++++++.html I bought one at the SnF flymart for $300, but I would not fly it that way. I took it to a certified prop shop owned by a friend and told I wanted it pitched incredibly low, that I would not complain about the rpm no matter how high it was. He told me that the lowest legal pitch was 42", and my response was "Then, I guess that is what the paperwork will say." My estimate is that it is in the 40-38" range. This hits 2575 on the takeoff roll. It increased the rate of climb by more than 50%, but most impressive, it shortened the ground roll from 350' to 140'. If you don't look at the tach to closely, the plane will still do 95-100 mph. If I was building a Cont. Piet, I would used the same prop. BTW, it comes as 74" for 65hp engines, but it works much better at 71" on any engine 75hp and up. Don't take my word for it, there have been countless tests done on Cubs to verify this. . On a C series Continental, you can have just a starter by no charging system. Graces' 85hp has been this way for 15 years. It uses this starter: http://www.bandc.biz/continentalstarter12vhomebuilt.aspx which isn't cheap but it is a heck of a lot lighter and requires less amps than the stock starter. We use an Odyssey 680 sized battery, which is about half the size and weight of a standard aircraft Gill battery, but I think it would work fine with a PC-545 sized battery. It will actually get 50-75 starts between chargings. . If you are looking for alternative batteries, We have flown Deka SLA batteries for years, they are good, cheap and made in the US. We have also used Interstate SLA-1116 batteries, it fits in an odyssey 680 sized box, and is half the money. The last one we had took 8 years to get tired. The Deka site is: http://www.eastpennmanufacturing.com/about/facilities/ . -ww. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438105#438105 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 06, 2015
From: danhelsper(at)aol.com
Subject: Re: Hot Mag Fatality.
I will chime in with another educational story. It was Brodhead 2013 I think. It had been a long day of giving one ride after another. I had taken a lunch break, and the Model A had turned cold. So I climbed back in with the next passenger in line. One of the older members (and very experienced) of our group volunteered to prop me. So I said what I always do in this situation, "Turn the prop through four blades with the mags off". So he dutifully does just what I asked, then I, without further thought, turned the mag switch to "on", anticipating he would pause before touching the prop once again....WRONG! We were both very surprised when he grabs the prop again without missing a beat and the A predictably fires off! I assure you he was startled by the look in his eyes, and I shuddered when I thought what might have happened to a man who's aging reflexes might not have allowed his body to get out of the way. That bullet was dodged....and a lesson learned. Dan Helsper Loensloe Airfield Puryear, TN -----Original Message----- From: AircamperN11MS <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org> Sent: Thu, Feb 5, 2015 3:03 pm Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Hot Mag Fatality. Marcus, I never turn my engine backwards. I used to do that but have found a better way of clearing a flooded Cont. engine. To answer your question. Once the coil in the Magneto is charged it can fire and hurt you if the mags are not grounded. When the points break then you will get a spark to the plugs no mater which direction you turn the engine. By turning the engine backwards you are also pushing all the oil from the oil pump back into the oil tank. I need to run to a meeting right now. More later if you want. -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438093#438093 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Any Piets/Builders in the Charlotte area?
From: "dfwplt" <jim_markle(at)mindspring.com>
Date: Feb 06, 2015
I'll have trips in the next couple weeks to Anderson, SC and Newton, NC and wonder if there are any Piet People in the area? Flying into/out of Charlotte. Jim in Pryor Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438120#438120 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Cub Fuel Tank from project
From: "tkreiner" <tkreiner(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 06, 2015
A SE TX project plane is available, and for the right $$$, I might be interested in getting it. Project has ribs, two sets of spars, steel tube fuse, and a box full of extra tubing, etc. The tank is a new, unused J3 Cub tank, and it still has stickers on it... So, the question is: is anyone using a J3 Cub fuel tank in their Piet? If so, please let me know your experience, i.e., not enough fuel, just right, etc., also, let me know whether it's a drop in, or requires a lot of work to use. Since I have a fuse, the steel tube fuse might become available. Thanks, -------- Tom Kreiner Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438121#438121 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Air Camper vs SLSA
From: "taildrags" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 06, 2015
So I was catching up on my stack of reading on a recent commercial flight and I get to a page in Flying magazine where they are showing a very special deal... a Quicksilver Sport 2SE, only $39,999. It's a 2-place, open cockpit, double-surface wing, strut braced. 65HP, 1000 lb. max takeoff weight, cruises at a max of about 60 MPH. Sounds a lot like an Air Camper, right? Considering that I'm going to be offering my Air Camper for sale for something a little south of $10k, this means I could possibly find four Air Campers for the price of one new SLSA, and I could fly a different airplane every other day of the week if I wanted to. There is something in my mind that cannot understand this, but I'm hoping it's only because I'm in early- to mid-geezerhood and this is normal for us. Oh, and also- a simple "glass panel" instrument for an LSA, plus an ADS-B gadget, seem to add up to the same cost as my Air Camper. It's a good thing I'm headed for senility... that's probably the only way any of this will make sense. I'm glad it's Friday. -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438123#438123 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Air Camper vs SLSA
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Feb 06, 2015
Oscar, Have you been swimming around inside my head??????? -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438124#438124 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Engelkenjohn" <mushface1(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Air Camper vs SLSA
Date: Feb 06, 2015
Its easy. Why would you drive a Bentley for upwards of $300,000 when you could drive a dozen Chevrolets or Fords or whatever for that price? Don't you hold your pinkies out when you fly? dennis -----Original Message----- From: taildrags Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 3:14 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Air Camper vs SLSA So I was catching up on my stack of reading on a recent commercial flight and I get to a page in Flying magazine where they are showing a very special deal... a Quicksilver Sport 2SE, only $39,999. It's a 2-place, open cockpit, double-surface wing, strut braced. 65HP, 1000 lb. max takeoff weight, cruises at a max of about 60 MPH. Sounds a lot like an Air Camper, right? Considering that I'm going to be offering my Air Camper for sale for something a little south of $10k, this means I could possibly find four Air Campers for the price of one new SLSA, and I could fly a different airplane every other day of the week if I wanted to. There is something in my mind that cannot understand this, but I'm hoping it's only because I'm in early- to mid-geezerhood and this is normal for us. Oh, and also- a simple "glass panel" instrument for an LSA, plus an ADS-B gadget, seem to add up to the same cost as my Air Camper. It's a good thing I'm headed for senility... that's probably the only way any of this will make sense. I'm glad it's Friday. -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438123#438123 --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 06, 2015
Subject: Re: Any Piets/Builders in the Charlotte area?
From: "Charles N. Campbell" <charlescampbell1924(at)gmail.com>
Jim, I live in Salisbury, NC which is about 40 miles from Charlotte up Interstate 85. I have a Piet about done except for welding up the landing gear and engine mount. After that I'll get an IA to look at it and then comes the covering. Would love to meet you. Chuck On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:40 PM, dfwplt wrote: > > I'll have trips in the next couple weeks to Anderson, SC and Newton, NC > and wonder if there are any Piet People in the area? Flying into/out of > Charlotte. > > Jim in Pryor > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438120#438120 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Air Camper vs SLSA
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Feb 06, 2015
Wow, The Quicksilver does everything a Piet does, but only slower. Did you notice that the TBO on the engine is only 300 hours????? The stall speed is 38 MPH, I think most Piets stall a lot slower than that. Oscar, Please burn that rag of an article so nobody else can read it. Geesh, Some people will buy most anything. I hope I have not offended anyone on this list that may have one. It is Friday and the list is always slow on Fridays. I think Fridays should be our "we can say what we want day without offending". All in fun folks. Cheers all, -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438130#438130 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ben Charvet <bencharvet(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Cub Fuel Tank from project
Date: Feb 06, 2015
I'm using a J3 tank. It was an easy fit amd 12 gallons is more than i need Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 6, 2015, at 4:02 PM, tkreiner wrote: > > > A SE TX project plane is available, and for the right $$$, I might be interested in getting it. Project has ribs, two sets of spars, steel tube fuse, and a box full of extra tubing, etc. The tank is a new, unused J3 Cub tank, and it still has stickers on it... > > So, the question is: is anyone using a J3 Cub fuel tank in their Piet? If so, please let me know your experience, i.e., not enough fuel, just right, etc., also, let me know whether it's a drop in, or requires a lot of work to use. > > Since I have a fuse, the steel tube fuse might become available. > > Thanks, > > -------- > Tom Kreiner > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438121#438121 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Air Camper vs SLSA
From: "taildrags" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 06, 2015
Dennis; I do not hold my pinkies out when I fly. I have found that it adds drag and slows the airplane when I do that. I am not out to bad-mouth anyone else's favorite airplane; not at all. The point I wanted to make is that the Pietenpol Air Camper has a fantastic cost-to-benefit ratio. My other point was that neither a glass panel nor ADS-B gadget does anything to make me a better pilot or the airplane a better performer, but they certainly cost plenty of money. -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438136#438136 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Engelkenjohn" <mushface1(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Air Camper vs SLSA
Date: Feb 06, 2015
I understood, I was trying to be tongue in cheek but you know how the interweb is, you can't show humor. Dennis -----Original Message----- From: taildrags Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 5:03 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Air Camper vs SLSA Dennis; I do not hold my pinkies out when I fly. I have found that it adds drag and slows the airplane when I do that. I am not out to bad-mouth anyone else's favorite airplane; not at all. The point I wanted to make is that the Pietenpol Air Camper has a fantastic cost-to-benefit ratio. My other point was that neither a glass panel nor ADS-B gadget does anything to make me a better pilot or the airplane a better performer, but they certainly cost plenty of money. -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438136#438136 --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Air Camper vs SLSA
From: "wheelharp" <wheelharp(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 06, 2015
Oscar, You are going to put NX41CC up for sale? -------- Jon Jones Ironton, MO Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438141#438141 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Air Camper vs SLSA
From: "wheelharp" <wheelharp(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 06, 2015
Oscar, You are going to put NX41CC up for sale? -------- Jon Jones Ironton, MO Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438142#438142 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Air Camper vs SLSA
From: "taildrags" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 06, 2015
Yes, Scout will be up for sale this spring. I'm not even bothering with it right now, since it's still cold and rainy up here in the PacNW, but come springtime it's going to be available. I have two other projects waiting for me in the hangar and I'll never work on them if I have an airplane to fly. -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438143#438143 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jack <fastnaught(at)windstream.net>
Subject: Re: Any Piets/Builders in the Charlotte area?
Date: Feb 06, 2015
Jim, I'm in Gilbert, SC. That's about an hour away. It's just west of Columbia. You're welcome anytime if you like. My airplane is finished and waiting for the DAR on the 14th. Jack Sent from my iPad > On Feb 6, 2015, at 3:40 PM, dfwplt wrote: > > > I'll have trips in the next couple weeks to Anderson, SC and Newton, NC and wonder if there are any Piet People in the area? Flying into/out of Charlotte. > > Jim in Pryor > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438120#438120 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ray Krause <raykrause(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: Air Camper vs SLSA
Date: Feb 06, 2015
Oscar, I could just buy your plane and part it out for more than 10K! Hmm, engine 10K, turn buckles $500, wheels $300, instruments $800, prop $1000, your time ZILTCH. Had a great visit with Gary Boothe today. Poor guy had to listen to my blabbing for about two hours! Too big a price to pay for a breakfast! Ray Krause Sent from my iPad > On Feb 6, 2015, at 1:14 PM, taildrags wrote: > > > So I was catching up on my stack of reading on a recent commercial flight and I get to a page in Flying magazine where they are showing a very special deal... a Quicksilver Sport 2SE, only $39,999. It's a 2-place, open cockpit, double-surface wing, strut braced. 65HP, 1000 lb. max takeoff weight, cruises at a max of about 60 MPH. Sounds a lot like an Air Camper, right? > > Considering that I'm going to be offering my Air Camper for sale for something a little south of $10k, this means I could possibly find four Air Campers for the price of one new SLSA, and I could fly a different airplane every other day of the week if I wanted to. > > There is something in my mind that cannot understand this, but I'm hoping it's only because I'm in early- to mid-geezerhood and this is normal for us. > > Oh, and also- a simple "glass panel" instrument for an LSA, plus an ADS-B gadget, seem to add up to the same cost as my Air Camper. It's a good thing I'm headed for senility... that's probably the only way any of this will make sense. > > I'm glad it's Friday. > > -------- > Oscar Zuniga > Medford, OR > Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" > A75 power > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438123#438123 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ray Krause <raykrause(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: Cub Fuel Tank from project
Date: Feb 06, 2015
I'm using one in the Sky Scout, but had to cut a triangle piece off the bott om rear area, now it holds only 10 gals. Easy installation. Sent from my iPad > On Feb 6, 2015, at 1:55 PM, Ben Charvet wrote: > > > I'm using a J3 tank. It was an easy fit amd 12 gallons is more than i need > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Feb 6, 2015, at 4:02 PM, tkreiner wrote: >> >> >> A SE TX project plane is available, and for the right $$$, I might be int erested in getting it. Project has ribs, two sets of spars, steel tube fuse , and a box full of extra tubing, etc. The tank is a new, unused J3 Cub tan k, and it still has stickers on it... >> >> So, the question is: is anyone using a J3 Cub fuel tank in their Piet? I f so, please let me know your experience, i.e., not enough fuel, just right, etc., also, let me know whether it's a drop in, or requires a lot of work t o use. >> >> Since I have a fuse, the steel tube fuse might become available. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -------- >> Tom Kreiner >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438121#438121 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > > >

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Air Camper vs SLSA
From: "wheelharp" <wheelharp(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 06, 2015
If I wasn't so looking forward to building my own Piet, I would jump on that deal so fast your head would spin : ) -------- Jon Jones Ironton, MO Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438148#438148 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Air Camper vs SLSA
From: "wheelharp" <wheelharp(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 06, 2015
If I wasn't so looking forward to building my own Piet, I would jump on that deal so fast your head would spin : ) -------- Jon Jones Ironton, MO Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438149#438149 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Any Piets/Builders in the Charlotte area?
From: "William Wynne" <WilliamTCA(at)aol.com>
Date: Feb 06, 2015
If you are headed over to see Jack in Gilbert, Barnwell is about 45 more minutes south. It is the home of two flying Corvair powered Pietempols, P.F. Beck's: http://flycorvair.net/2014/11/16/the-cherry-grove-trophy-2014/ . and Don Harper's http://flycorvair.net/2013/01/17/nwe-pietenpol-2700-corvair-don-harper-sc/ Tim Freer is the airport manager, he knows both men well, you can touch base with him and make sure they are around. All three men are the central crew that are the local host of the 5 Corvair Colleges we have held in Barnwell. I am not sure if Jack is at the White Plains airport (I think it is in Gilbert) but that was the Location of Corvair Colleges #12 and #16. With local host Ed and Val Fisher. A friendly residential airport. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438151#438151 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Ray Krause
Date: Feb 06, 2015
"Had a great visit with Gary Boothe today. Poor guy had to listen to my blabbing for about two hours! Too big a price to pay for a breakfast!" I think I have posted these pictures before of Ray's absolutely impeccable Waiex, and his Sky Scout, now getting fabric. You can bet that when Ray has something to say, I'll be listening! Gary Boothe NX308MB -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ray Krause Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 6:58 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Air Camper vs SLSA --> Oscar, I could just buy your plane and part it out for more than 10K! Hmm, engine 10K, turn buckles $500, wheels $300, instruments $800, prop $1000, your time ZILTCH. Had a great visit with Gary Boothe today. Poor guy had to listen to my blabbing for about two hours! Too big a price to pay for a breakfast! Ray Krause Sent from my iPad > On Feb 6, 2015, at 1:14 PM, taildrags wrote: > > --> > > So I was catching up on my stack of reading on a recent commercial flight and I get to a page in Flying magazine where they are showing a very special deal... a Quicksilver Sport 2SE, only $39,999. It's a 2-place, open cockpit, double-surface wing, strut braced. 65HP, 1000 lb. max takeoff weight, cruises at a max of about 60 MPH. Sounds a lot like an Air Camper, right? > > Considering that I'm going to be offering my Air Camper for sale for something a little south of $10k, this means I could possibly find four Air Campers for the price of one new SLSA, and I could fly a different airplane every other day of the week if I wanted to. > > There is something in my mind that cannot understand this, but I'm hoping it's only because I'm in early- to mid-geezerhood and this is normal for us. > > Oh, and also- a simple "glass panel" instrument for an LSA, plus an ADS-B gadget, seem to add up to the same cost as my Air Camper. It's a good thing I'm headed for senility... that's probably the only way any of this will make sense. > > I'm glad it's Friday. > > -------- > Oscar Zuniga > Medford, OR > Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" > A75 power > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438123#438123 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Air Camper vs SLSA
From: "William Wynne" <WilliamTCA(at)aol.com>
Date: Feb 06, 2015
Oz, The math says building a Pietenpol is poor investment of one's money, While the heart says that it is an excellent investment in one's life. As you well know, you can figure out costs with a calculator, but the can not measure value, which is best done with that organ in your chest. . Consider that a $3,000 overhaul at 300 hrs is about twice the hourly amortization rate of a Lycoming. which will cost four times as much but go eight times as long, to say nothing about down time nor reliability. . I have 3 close friends at our airport, Dan Weseman, Vern Stevenson and Alex Follen, who each flew hundreds of hours behind two stroke Rotaxes in the 1990s. They are all super mechanical guys, alert to fine signals of an issue, all into extreme maintenance. They liked those engines, but I have to think that any two stroke engine is a poor match for a typical S-LSA buyer who might like flying, but has no real interest in nuts and bolts. Conversely, I think a big part of the success story of planes like J-3's was the fact the A-65 (or 75) on the front of your Piet, required no such special attention when it was the "S-LSA" of it's day. . In 1946, almost every modest sized or larger airport in the US had a professional mechanic ready and skilled in the care and feeding of the A-65 for the "S-LSA" pilot of that day. Today, no such service system exists to support a non-mechanical flyer trying to operate a $40K plane with a two stroke Rotax power plant. (there isn't really one for the 912 either) Yes, there are plenty of people who have been through some 20-40 hour Rotax training session, but suggesting such a person is then qualified to determine what is airworthly on a human carrying aircraft is a morbid joke. My A&P from Embry-Riddle had an FAA mandated 2,880 classroom and lab hours. If I suggested to the department chair Dick Ulm, USMC ( http://flycorvair.net/2014/02/23/erau-models-of-integrity/ ) that I was ready to work on planes at the end of my first week in the program, he would have laughed his ass off....and then probably punched my lights out. . Real Homebuilders, people in it to learn build and Fly, are immune to the vulnerabilities of typical S-LSA flyers, who are often just looking for another mechanical toy. Homebuilders are looking for freedom in all it's forms, and this includes educating oneself so you are free of being dependent on the availability and quality of maintenance professionals. The quote below is the core of the matter. Every few years they roll out a program to "get new people" interested in flying. All of these programs that fail to acknowledge that the commitment and motivation for success in aviation are higher, are bound to fail. Yet they never stop trotting out the comparisons between the cost of S-LSA planes and new boats, as if the whole issue can be solved with a calculator, ignoring the organ in the chest. . ------------------------------------------------ . At any real level, flying is not a sport, a hobby a pastime nor entertainment. It is an Endeavor, worthy of every hour of your life you invest; Those that dabble in it find only high cost, poor reward and serious risk. They are approaching it as consumers. Conversely, for those who devote their best efforts and their serious commitment, the rewards are without compare.-ww . (From the 'thought for the day' http://flycorvair.net/2015/01/12/thought-for-the-day-collection/) Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438153#438153 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Cub Fuel Tank from project
From: Jack <jack(at)textors.com>
Date: Feb 07, 2015
Tom it fits well. I'm putting a sump in mine so it hopefully will allow draining in the three point attitude... Sent from my iPad Jack Textor > On Feb 6, 2015, at 3:02 PM, "tkreiner" wrote: > > > A SE TX project plane is available, and for the right $$$, I might be interested in getting it. Project has ribs, two sets of spars, steel tube fuse, and a box full of extra tubing, etc. The tank is a new, unused J3 Cub tank, and it still has stickers on it... > > So, the question is: is anyone using a J3 Cub fuel tank in their Piet? If so, please let me know your experience, i.e., not enough fuel, just right, etc., also, let me know whether it's a drop in, or requires a lot of work to use. > > Since I have a fuse, the steel tube fuse might become available. > > Thanks, > > -------- > Tom Kreiner > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438121#438121 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Cub Fuel Tank from project
From: "TriScout" <apfelcyber(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Feb 07, 2015
That would be a "penzon" . penzon the engine you plan on installing. I did not build my GN-1, but had been flying it for 4 yrs now to BBQ's, Bfast, etc, and I'm liking the 12 gal Cub tank w/the A65. Just enough to stretch out and meet people at small aerodromes.. I entertained the thought/logistics of adding a temporary 30 gallon tank to the front seat and try to non-stop from Dallas-Brodhead, but not sure how I would add oil while inflightjust a daydream I suppose.. ler -------- KLNC A65-8 N2308C AN Hardware Airframe 724TT W72CK-42 Sensenich Standard Factory GN-1 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438158#438158 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Cub Fuel Tank from project
From: "taildrags" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 08, 2015
Tom; have you decided about purchasing that project? If you acquire the project and want to sell the steel tube fuselage, as they say in the upper midwest, "I'll buy it off ya" and have a friend who can pick it up. Regarding fuel capacity, Scout carries 16 gallons in the nose and has a Stromberg carb, so the geometry -not the tank capacity- determines the fuel flow and endurance. I have found, by experience, that the bottom 3 or 4 gallons are unusable in the 3-point attitude and are either "cruise reserve" for an emergency in level flight only, or are nose ballast. My airplane has a cruise range of about 2 hours, maybe 2-1/2, but that's about as long as I want to sit in the airplane at a single stretch anyway and I can generally plan on finding an airport or strip within 100-120 miles of my fueling point in most areas. Nevada and the California desert are exceptions, and headwinds change everything. The point is, if your Cub tank holds 12 gallons, you may want to do a fuel flow test the way Tony Bingelis describes it, and do your flight planning accordingly. -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438173#438173 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Change of e mail address
From: Claude Corbett <isablcorky(at)aol.com>
Date: Feb 08, 2015
Please change my address from isablcorky@aol .com to isablcorky@gmail .com Sent from my iPad ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Aerial progress
From: glenschweizer(at)yahoo.com
Date: Feb 08, 2015
Last weekend, the aerial was officially started! All structural lumber is hemlock except the spars which will be Douglas fir. The reasons for this are many. Both of these species are locally sourced(oregon and Washington). Extreme quality is readily available at a fraction or what Sitka Spruce would cost thru ACS, or Wicks. Shipping costs are amazing as well. Work benches wet completed last week end as well as ripping lots or really pretty Hemlock for Longerons,vertical and brace pieces for both fuselage sides. Layout and kitting of both sides was completed as well. This weekend both sides wet glued and gusseted. It sure feels good to finally be building again! Photos to follow. Glen Sent from my iPhone ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 08, 2015
Subject: Re: Cub Fuel Tank from project
From: Steven Dortch <steven.d.dortch(at)gmail.com>
Oscar, thanks for the heads up on unusable fuel. I poked around the Piper cub sites and their general consensus is a 12 gallon tank with 10 useable. Since my solution to putting two planes in a one plane hangar involves "kneeling" my Piet on it's nose, I am considering turning the nose tank around. Currently the gas cap is in the front 1/3. By turning it around, the cap would be in the rear 1/3rd. It would mean slightly less fuel in a 3 point attitude but I could leave more in it before putting it in storage. Just a weekend project. But it will not happen until I fly the thing. That is not required for flight. If I have to drain fuel before I put it up, so be it. Blue Skies, Steve D. On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 7:48 PM, taildrags wrote: > > Tom; have you decided about purchasing that project? If you acquire the > project and want to sell the steel tube fuselage, as they say in the upper > midwest, "I'll buy it off ya" and have a friend who can pick it up. > > Regarding fuel capacity, Scout carries 16 gallons in the nose and has a > Stromberg carb, so the geometry -not the tank capacity- determines the fuel > flow and endurance. I have found, by experience, that the bottom 3 or 4 > gallons are unusable in the 3-point attitude and are either "cruise > reserve" for an emergency in level flight only, or are nose ballast. My > airplane has a cruise range of about 2 hours, maybe 2-1/2, but that's about > as long as I want to sit in the airplane at a single stretch anyway and I > can generally plan on finding an airport or strip within 100-120 miles of > my fueling point in most areas. Nevada and the California desert are > exceptions, and headwinds change everything. The point is, if your Cub tank > holds 12 gallons, you may want to do a fuel flow test the way Tony Bingelis > describes it, and do your flight planning accordingly. > > -------- > Oscar Zuniga > Medford, OR > Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" > A75 power > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438173#438173 > > -- Blue Skies, Steve D ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Aerial progress
From: glenschweizer(at)yahoo.com
Date: Feb 08, 2015
Sent from my iPhone ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 09, 2015
Subject: A65 Primer Lines
From: Peter Johnson <vk3eka(at)bigpond.net.au>
Hi Guys, I managed to get the A65 to run for the first time after the rebuild on Saturday but after exhausting my energy I think a primer is called for. Where do you run the lines, to the spider or to each cylinder? Will in make much difference or should I just continue to use arm power to pull through the prop a few times? Thanks Peter Wonthaggi Australia http://repiet.cpc-world.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 09, 2015
Subject: A65 Primer Lines
From: Matt Paxton <woodflier(at)aol.com>
Peter, there should be a plug in the aluminum casting that the carburetor hangs from and the induction pipes come out of. On my engine, it's on the left side. I plumbed a 1/8" copper line in there from the primer. You need a compression fitting where that plug comes out, and, of course, a line from the gascolator to the primer. Matt Paxton NX629ML ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Peter Johnson <vk3eka(at)bigpond.net.au> Date: Feb 9, 2015 2:06 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: A65 Primer Lines Cc: > > Hi Guys, > > I managed to get the A65 to run for the first time after the rebuild on > Saturday but after exhausting my energy I think a primer is called for. > > Where do you run the lines, to the spider or to each cylinder? > > Will in make much difference or should I just continue to use arm power to > pull through the prop a few times? > > Thanks > > Peter > Wonthaggi Australia > http://repiet.cpc-world.com > > Ex ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Philips" <jack(at)bedfordlandings.com>
Subject: A65 Primer Lines
Date: Feb 09, 2015
Peter, I have a primer on my A65, plumbed exactly as Matt describes. I don't use it much in the summer, but in the winter, after the plane has sat for several weeks and is cold, it makes all the difference in the world. Different engines seem to have different personalities. I know some who use their primer every time they start the engine, and other who like me, don't seem to need it unless the weather is cold. The C-145 Continental in my Cessna 170 needs priming anytime I start it unless it has run within an hour or so. I used to have an RV-4 with an O-320 Lycoming in it. It had no primer and was a real bear to start if the temperature was below freezing. Many is the time I ran the battery dead trying to start that airplane in cold weather. Jack Phillips NX899JP Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Matt Paxton Sent: Monday, February 9, 2015 6:27 AM Subject: Fwd: Pietenpol-List: A65 Primer Lines Peter, there should be a plug in the aluminum casting that the carburetor hangs from and the induction pipes come out of. On my engine, it's on the left side. I plumbed a 1/8" copper line in there from the primer. You need a compression fitting where that plug comes out, and, of course, a line from the gascolator to the primer. Matt Paxton NX629ML ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Peter Johnson <vk3eka(at)bigpond.net.au> Date: Feb 9, 2015 2:06 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: A65 Primer Lines Cc: > --> > > Hi Guys, > > I managed to get the A65 to run for the first time after the rebuild > on Saturday but after exhausting my energy I think a primer is called for. > > Where do you run the lines, to the spider or to each cylinder? > > Will in make much difference or should I just continue to use arm > power to pull through the prop a few times? > > Thanks > > Peter > Wonthaggi Australia > http://repiet.cpc-world.com > > Ex ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Arial progress
From: glenschweizer(at)yahoo.com
Date: Feb 09, 2015
My project is finally an embrio! The week end of the thirtieth of Jan.,workbenches were built and one fuse side was laid out. This past weekend, I kitted the other fuse side, assembled one one Sat and the other side on Sun. The balance of the day was spent ripping cap strips for wing ribs. Most of the structural lumber is Hemlock. 7%heavier, slightly stronger and a whole lot less expensive,and if it matters to anyone, it's locally sourced. Doug Fir will be used for the spars, also locally sourced. For those who don't know, the Arial is a biplane adaptation of the aircamper designed by Chad Wille of St croix aviation My brother Dan has allowed me the use of a portion of his shop to build this project. Sure feels good to be building another airplane! Glen Sent from my iPhone ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Cub Fuel Tank from project
From: "taildrags" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 09, 2015
Steve; I'm glad to see that you've put things in proper perspective by recognizing that your fuel situation may require some adjustment, but you may be able to put off the adjustment until after you've begun test flights. Just don't get complacent... recognize the fuel system's possible limitations and respect those. Keep the fuel topped off or at least within the upper 3/4 of the tank until you're comfortable flying it in all regimes. Go through any list of experimental aircraft accidents and incidents and fuel problems will be in the top couple of causes. Read and heed. What I would probably do after that is fly the airplane in the pattern on a nice day, practicing takeoffs and landings to improve my skill and comfort at the controls as the fuel level got down into the bottom part of the tank. The rest is just my personal testing regime and is based on my comfort level with my plane, at my home field, under controlled conditions. There is no need to fly an actual dead-stick landing when you can simulate flying out of the very last of the tank by putting the tailwheel in a ditch and elevating the nose as you run the engine at a fast idle till it's starved of fuel and sputters to a halt. At that point you can determine how much of your fuel is actually unusable and how much is marginal, and go from there. -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438198#438198 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 10, 2015
Subject: Re: A65 Primer Lines
From: Peter Johnson <vk3eka(at)bigpond.net.au>
Thanks Guys, I blew some fuel into the spider primer hole today, started second pull Looks like I need to order a primer and fittings. Thanks Peter On 10/02/2015 12:31 am, "Jack Philips" wrote: > > >Peter, > >I have a primer on my A65, plumbed exactly as Matt describes. I don't >use it much in the summer, but in the winter, after the plane has sat for >several weeks and is cold, it makes all the difference in the world. > >Different engines seem to have different personalities. I know some who >use their primer every time they start the engine, and other who like me, >don't seem to need it unless the weather is cold. The C-145 Continental >in my Cessna 170 needs priming anytime I start it unless it has run >within an hour or so. > >I used to have an RV-4 with an O-320 Lycoming in it. It had no primer >and was a real bear to start if the temperature was below freezing. Many >is the time I ran the battery dead trying to start that airplane in cold >weather. > >Jack Phillips >NX899JP >Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com >[mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Matt >Paxton >Sent: Monday, February 9, 2015 6:27 AM >To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Fwd: Pietenpol-List: A65 Primer Lines > > >Peter, there should be a plug in the aluminum casting that the carburetor >hangs from and the induction pipes come out of. On my engine, it's on the >left side. I plumbed a 1/8" copper line in there from the primer. You >need a compression fitting where that plug comes out, and, of course, a >line from the gascolator to the primer. > >Matt Paxton >NX629ML >---------- Forwarded message ---------- >From: Peter Johnson <vk3eka(at)bigpond.net.au> >Date: Feb 9, 2015 2:06 AM >Subject: Pietenpol-List: A65 Primer Lines >To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >Cc: > >> --> >> >> Hi Guys, >> >> I managed to get the A65 to run for the first time after the rebuild >> on Saturday but after exhausting my energy I think a primer is called >>for. >> >> Where do you run the lines, to the spider or to each cylinder? >> >> Will in make much difference or should I just continue to use arm >> power to pull through the prop a few times? >> >> Thanks >> >> Peter >> Wonthaggi Australia >> http://repiet.cpc-world.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Ex > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 10, 2015
Subject: Re: A65 Primer Lines
From: Peter Johnson <vk3eka(at)bigpond.net.au>
Jack/Matt, Another question if I may: If I use a spray fitting (AN4022-1) on the inlet manifold end it seems I need to use a copper tube. If I use a standard AN816-2D fitting (no spray), I can use aly tube. Which is best? Cheers Peter On 10/02/2015 6:23 pm, "Peter Johnson" wrote: > > >Thanks Guys, > >I blew some fuel into the spider primer hole today, started second pull? > >Looks like I need to order a primer and fittings. > >Thanks > >Peter > > >On 10/02/2015 12:31 am, "Jack Philips" wrote: > >> >> >>Peter, >> >>I have a primer on my A65, plumbed exactly as Matt describes. I don't >>use it much in the summer, but in the winter, after the plane has sat for >>several weeks and is cold, it makes all the difference in the world. >> >>Different engines seem to have different personalities. I know some who >>use their primer every time they start the engine, and other who like me, >>don't seem to need it unless the weather is cold. The C-145 Continental >>in my Cessna 170 needs priming anytime I start it unless it has run >>within an hour or so. >> >>I used to have an RV-4 with an O-320 Lycoming in it. It had no primer >>and was a real bear to start if the temperature was below freezing. Many >>is the time I ran the battery dead trying to start that airplane in cold >>weather. >> >>Jack Phillips >>NX899JP >>Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com >>[mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Matt >>Paxton >>Sent: Monday, February 9, 2015 6:27 AM >>To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >>Subject: Fwd: Pietenpol-List: A65 Primer Lines >> >> >>Peter, there should be a plug in the aluminum casting that the carburetor >>hangs from and the induction pipes come out of. On my engine, it's on the >>left side. I plumbed a 1/8" copper line in there from the primer. You >>need a compression fitting where that plug comes out, and, of course, a >>line from the gascolator to the primer. >> >>Matt Paxton >>NX629ML >>---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>From: Peter Johnson <vk3eka(at)bigpond.net.au> >>Date: Feb 9, 2015 2:06 AM >>Subject: Pietenpol-List: A65 Primer Lines >>To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >>Cc: >> >>> --> >>> >>> Hi Guys, >>> >>> I managed to get the A65 to run for the first time after the rebuild >>> on Saturday but after exhausting my energy I think a primer is called >>>for. >>> >>> Where do you run the lines, to the spider or to each cylinder? >>> >>> Will in make much difference or should I just continue to use arm >>> power to pull through the prop a few times? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Peter >>> Wonthaggi Australia >>> http://repiet.cpc-world.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Ex >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Philips" <jack(at)bedfordlandings.com>
Subject: A65 Primer Lines
Date: Feb 10, 2015
Peter, I used the spray fitting with a copper tube. Be sure to bend a loop in the tubing to allow the tube to flex as the engine moves on its mounts. Jack Phillips NX899JP Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Peter Johnson Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 5:28 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: A65 Primer Lines --> Jack/Matt, Another question if I may: If I use a spray fitting (AN4022-1) on the inlet manifold end it seems I need to use a copper tube. If I use a standard AN816-2D fitting (no spray), I can use aly tube. Which is best? Cheers Peter On 10/02/2015 6:23 pm, "Peter Johnson" wrote: > > >Thanks Guys, > >I blew some fuel into the spider primer hole today, started second pull? > >Looks like I need to order a primer and fittings. > >Thanks > >Peter > > >On 10/02/2015 12:31 am, "Jack Philips" wrote: > >> >> >>Peter, >> >>I have a primer on my A65, plumbed exactly as Matt describes. I don't >>use it much in the summer, but in the winter, after the plane has sat >>for several weeks and is cold, it makes all the difference in the world. >> >>Different engines seem to have different personalities. I know some >>who use their primer every time they start the engine, and other who >>like me, don't seem to need it unless the weather is cold. The C-145 >>Continental in my Cessna 170 needs priming anytime I start it unless >>it has run within an hour or so. >> >>I used to have an RV-4 with an O-320 Lycoming in it. It had no primer >>and was a real bear to start if the temperature was below freezing. >>Many is the time I ran the battery dead trying to start that airplane >>in cold weather. >> >>Jack Phillips >>NX899JP >>Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com >>[mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Matt >>Paxton >>Sent: Monday, February 9, 2015 6:27 AM >>To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >>Subject: Fwd: Pietenpol-List: A65 Primer Lines >> >> >>Peter, there should be a plug in the aluminum casting that the >>carburetor hangs from and the induction pipes come out of. On my >>engine, it's on the left side. I plumbed a 1/8" copper line in there >>from the primer. You need a compression fitting where that plug comes >>out, and, of course, a line from the gascolator to the primer. >> >>Matt Paxton >>NX629ML >>---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>From: Peter Johnson <vk3eka(at)bigpond.net.au> >>Date: Feb 9, 2015 2:06 AM >>Subject: Pietenpol-List: A65 Primer Lines >>To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >>Cc: >> >>> --> >>> >>> Hi Guys, >>> >>> I managed to get the A65 to run for the first time after the rebuild >>>on Saturday but after exhausting my energy I think a primer is called >>>for. >>> >>> Where do you run the lines, to the spider or to each cylinder? >>> >>> Will in make much difference or should I just continue to use arm >>> power to pull through the prop a few times? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Peter >>> Wonthaggi Australia >>> http://repiet.cpc-world.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Ex >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: A65 Primer Lines
From: "taildrags" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 10, 2015
I'm probably going to catch some flak for this, especially since my airplane does not have a primer, but there is a very inexpensive one available through Great Plains, here: http://www.greatplainsas.com/scfuel.html The ones from Aircraft Spruce and other aircraft supply houses are typically much more expensive. What I don't like about the Great Plains primer is that it uses push-on tubing over barbed nipples, without any real fittings. And all of this goes in your cockpit (unless you do like some of the Model A setups and install the primer up front). -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438210#438210 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 10, 2015
From: woodflier <woodflier(at)aol.com>
Subject: A65 Primer Lines
Peter, I', pretty sure I just used the straight AN816-2D fitting. And like Jack said, I never have to prime when it's warm. I pull the prop through 5-8 blades and it starts easy and no blades when it's warm. This time of year, when the temp is in the 40s or 50s, I do need one good shot of prime. Matt -----Original Message----- From: Peter Johnson <vk3eka(at)bigpond.net.au> Sent: Tue, Feb 10, 2015 5:30 am Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: A65 Primer Lines Jack/Matt, Another question if I may: If I use a spray fitting (AN4022-1) on the inlet manifold end it seems I need to use a copper tube. If I use a standard AN816-2D fitting (no spray), I can use aly tube. Which is best? Cheers Peter On 10/02/2015 6:23 pm, "Peter Johnson" wrote: > > >Thanks Guys, > >I blew some fuel into the spider primer hole today, started second pull? > >Looks like I need to order a primer and fittings. > >Thanks > >Peter > > >On 10/02/2015 12:31 am, "Jack Philips" wrote: > >> >> >>Peter, >> >>I have a primer on my A65, plumbed exactly as Matt describes. I don't >>use it much in the summer, but in the winter, after the plane has sat for >>several weeks and is cold, it makes all the difference in the world. >> >>Different engines seem to have different personalities. I know some who >>use their primer every time they start the engine, and other who like me, >>don't seem to need it unless the weather is cold. The C-145 Continental >>in my Cessna 170 needs priming anytime I start it unless it has run >>within an hour or so. >> >>I used to have an RV-4 with an O-320 Lycoming in it. It had no primer >>and was a real bear to start if the temperature was below freezing. Many >>is the time I ran the battery dead trying to start that airplane in cold >>weather. >> >>Jack Phillips >>NX899JP >>Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com >>[mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Matt >>Paxton >>Sent: Monday, February 9, 2015 6:27 AM >>To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >>Subject: Fwd: Pietenpol-List: A65 Primer Lines >> >> >>Peter, there should be a plug in the aluminum casting that the carburetor >>hangs from and the induction pipes come out of. On my engine, it's on the >>left side. I plumbed a 1/8" copper line in there from the primer. You >>need a compression fitting where that plug comes out, and, of course, a >>line from the gascolator to the primer. >> >>Matt Paxton >>NX629ML >>---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>From: Peter Johnson <vk3eka(at)bigpond.net.au> >>Date: Feb 9, 2015 2:06 AM >>Subject: Pietenpol-List: A65 Primer Lines >>To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com >>Cc: >> >>> --> >>> >>> Hi Guys, >>> >>> I managed to get the A65 to run for the first time after the rebuild >>> on Saturday but after exhausting my energy I think a primer is called >>>for. >>> >>> Where do you run the lines, to the spider or to each cylinder? >>> >>> Will in make much difference or should I just continue to use arm >>> power to pull through the prop a few times? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Peter >>> Wonthaggi Australia >>> http://repiet.cpc-world.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Ex >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-LME0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Subject: Usable fuel--- gravity flow fuel systems
Date: Feb 10, 2015
http://spirit.eaa.org/apps/magazines/eaa_articles/1973_03_05.pdf I've attached a good fuel system article by Tony Bingelis but if you have t he books by Tony Bingelis he will show you how to install a flawless fuel system and also show you how to exactly calculate how much fuel you have that is usable an unusable in your system. I have a 17 gallon nose tank and I did the prescribed static fuel flow mea surements for my Piet setup on a earthen barn ramp that was in the back of an old farmhouse I was renting while building. The barn ramp simulated my plane at a climb angle and the fuel flow was mea sured into a Rubbermaid iced-tea container which had both ml and oz graduations on it. That, a stopwatch on my watch (now cell phone stop watches work great) and some fuel and I all I needed. The method Bingelis suggests puts the plane in a climb attitude and his cal culations account for a full-power climb out situation. Those four books are worth their weight in platinum or gold (depending on which is higher!) Best $89 you'll ever spend on your Pietenpol! https://www.eaa.org/en/eaa-shop/homebuilders_corner/2251598800000__bingelis -set-of-4 Mike C. Ohio ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-LME0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Subject: short Piet video---of possible interest
Date: Feb 10, 2015
Just stumbled upon this searching "Pietenpol" in YouTube at lunch time. Mike C. http://chronicle.augusta.com/stories/2007/06/12/met_131957.shtml ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Aerial progress
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Feb 10, 2015
Glen, It looks good. It's amazing how quickly the structures take shape. I hope to see you come down to the Piet gathering at Frazier Lake in June. Bring some parts you have made and show them off. Keep it up my friend, Cheers, -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438221#438221 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 10, 2015
Subject: location of "Starting" controls
From: Steven Dortch <steven.d.dortch(at)gmail.com>
Oscar mentions the thought of putting the Primer up front where you hand prop. My FlyBaby buddy has his mag switches up front on the outside so that he can turn them on and off when he is hand propping. He can also reach them from the pilot seat. That way he is not going around the wind and back and forth. What do y'all think? -- Blue Skies, Steve D ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: location of "Starting" controls
From: glenschweizer(at)yahoo.com
Date: Feb 10, 2015
Dh60,and Dh82 tigermoth have mag switch located on the port side exterior . They've always been that way for safety. Of the guy flipping the prop. Glen Aerial in progress Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 10, 2015, at 1:51 PM, Steven Dortch wro te: > > Oscar mentions the thought of putting the Primer up front where you hand p rop. > > My FlyBaby buddy has his mag switches up front on the outside so that he c an turn them on and off when he is hand propping. He can also reach them fro m the pilot seat. That way he is not going around the wind and back and fort h. > > What do y'all think? > > -- > Blue Skies, > Steve D > > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Aerial progress
From: glenschweizer(at)yahoo.com
Date: Feb 10, 2015
Thank you for the invitation to Frazer Lake. I've offered to "fly" ground support for Oscar. I hope he'll fly Scout from Medford. I definitely plan to be there. Blauer Himmel Glen Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 10, 2015, at 1:44 PM, "AircamperN11MS" wrote: > > > Glen, > > It looks good. It's amazing how quickly the structures take shape. I hope to see you come down to the Piet gathering at Frazier Lake in June. Bring some parts you have made and show them off. > > Keep it up my friend, Cheers, > > -------- > Scott Liefeld > Flying N11MS since March 1972 > Steel Tube > C-85-12 > Wire Wheels > Brodhead in 1996 > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438221#438221 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Piet on eBay
From: Jack <jack(at)textors.com>
Date: Feb 11, 2015
http://www.ebay.com/itm/PIETENPOL-AIRCAMPER-/381153205058?ssPageName=ADME:SS:SS:US:1120 Sent from my iPad Jack Textor ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 11, 2015
Subject: Re: Piet on eBay
From: Steven Dortch <steven.d.dortch(at)gmail.com>
looks positivly high tech. Altimeter, compass, airspeed and VSI. two radios, clock, intercom, engine instrumentation, Parking brake. interesting location for ELT Is that a G-meter? I see carb heat and (I think) mixture, what is the other lever for in front of the throttle? mine is a lot simpler. My commo gear is a megaphone. Airspeed is done by throwing a piece of wood on a rope overboard and counting the knots on the rope as it feeds out. My compass is a magnetized needle setting on a leaf in a bowl of water which is much better than using the moss growth on the north side of the cabanes. -- Blue Skies, Steve D ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Piet on eBay
From: glenschweizer(at)yahoo.com
Date: Feb 11, 2015
Ya mean moss growth on the north side of cabanes has been replaced by what? And I know I'm going fast enough when I can't hear her yellin from the fron t pit. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Steven Dortch wro te: > > looks positivly high tech. > > Altimeter, compass, airspeed and VSI. > two radios, clock, intercom, engine instrumentation, Parking brake. intere sting location for ELT > Is that a G-meter? > I see carb heat and (I think) mixture, what is the other lever for in fron t of the throttle? > mine is a lot simpler. > My commo gear is a megaphone. > Airspeed is done by throwing a piece of wood on a rope overboard and count ing the knots on the rope as it feeds out. > My compass is a magnetized needle setting on a leaf in a bowl of water whi ch is much better than using the moss growth on the north side of the cabane s. > > -- > Blue Skies, > Steve D > > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-LME0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Subject: Pietenpol biplane project-- Glen
Date: Feb 11, 2015
R2xlbuKAlGxvb2tzIGxpa2UgeW914oCZcmUgbWFraW5nIGdyZWF0IHByb2dyZXNzIG9uIHlvdXIg UGlldG5lcG9sIGJpcGxhbmUhDQoNCkRvIHlvdSBoYXZlIGEgY29sb3Igc2NoZW1lIGFuZCBlbmdp bmUgcGlja2VkIG91dCBieSBjaGFuY2UgeWV0Pw0KDQpNaWtlIEMuDQpPaGlvDQoNCg= ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Pietenpol biplane project-- Glen
From: glenschweizer(at)yahoo.com
Date: Feb 11, 2015
Hello,Mike I plan to use a William Wynne Corvair conversion of 110 HP. This engine wil l be built with a fifth bearing and billet crank. I've given lots of thought to a color scheme and have decided to go with a n adaptation of the British Cammoflage used on the dH82 Tigermoth. I'm thoroughly enjoying the build process. I'm doing most of the build a t my brother's shop about40 minutes from home. Ribs are being built at home and I'm currently kitting all the parts for the top wing. They're standard pietenpol. The lower wing ribs are the same profile but smaller. With 28r ibs on top and 24 on the bottom, I'll be pretty busy. While I'm on the subject of ribs, I made a prototype from the rib jig to double check measurements of a finished product. I used CA glue for this a nd decided to make a test piece as I do for every batch of T-88. In testing to destruction, I got the same results. Any thoughts on using CA glue inst ead of T-88 for the ribs? Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 11, 2015, at 10:40 AM, "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-LME0)[Vantage Partners , LLC]" wrote: > > Glen=C3=A2=82=AC=9Dlooks like you=C3=A2=82=AC=84=A2re makin g great progress on your Pietnepol biplane! > > Do you have a color scheme and engine picked out by chance yet? > > Mike C. > Ohio > > ky=C2=B7=C3=A8=C5=BE=C3=9B"=C3=8D=C3=AD=C5=93=C2=A2Z+=C3=93M4=C3=93G=C3=9A q=C3=A7(=C2=BA=C2=B8=C5=BE=C2=AEw=C2=B0r=B9=C2=AB=B0=C3=C3=93 =C3=A3=C3=A2z=C3=97=C2=A7=C2=B0K=C5-=C3=8BD=84=A2=C2=A8 =C2=A5=16=C5-=C3=AE=84=A2K=1E=C2=B6=17=C5=92j=C3=9A=C3=A8=C5=BE',.+-=15 =C3=C2=AD=C2=BA=C2=B7=C2=AC5=C2=AB=C3=A2=C2=81=C2=ABh=C2=AE=C3=9A=1B=C2=AE =C5=92,z=C3=98^=84=A2=C2=A9=C3=B2.+-=C2=BA=C3=98=C2=A5=C5-=C3=98=C5=BE=C2 =B2=C3=8B=C5=93=C2=AB=0B=C5-=C3=8BT=C5=B8=C3=B4=C2=AEn=C3=87+=C5- =BAb=C2=A2p+r=18=C2=AFy'=C5=A1=C2=AD=C3=88C=C2=A3 =C3=A5=C2=A1=C2=A7{ =C2=AC=C2=81=C2=AE=C5=92,x(Z=C2=B4P=10>=1A-=C2=A2=C3=88Z=C2=AD=C3=C2=A7v k=C5=93-k=C5=93-j+y=C2=A8ky=C3=B8m=C2=B6=C5=B8=C3=C3=83=0C &j=C3=9A=C3=A8=C5=BE',r=B0=C25=C2=AB=C3=A2=C2=81=C2=ABh=C2=AC=C3=B8 =C5=BE=C2=B5=C3=A9=C3=A9=C2=A2R=C3=A2=C2=B2=C3=98m=C2=B6=C5=B8=C3=C3=83=0C &j=C3=9A=C3=A8=C5=BE',r=B0=C25=C2=AB=C3=A2=C2=81=C2=ABh=C2=AC=C3=B8 =C5=BE=C2=B5=C3=A9=C3=A9=C2=A2R=C3=A2=C2=B2=C3=9F=C3=9A0=04=C3=918=C3=92=02I a=01=14=C3=A4T1$=C5=A1=84=A2=C3=A8+y=C2=AB\=C2=A2{^=C5=BE=C3'=C2=A5=C2=B2 -=C2=AFj)ZnW=C2=AF=B0=C2=ABayg=BA=16=C5-=C3=AE=C5=A1=C3 =86=C2=A1=C2=AD=C3=A7=C3=A1=C2=B6=C3=9A=7F=C3=BD=C3=BA+=C2=BAk&j=C3=9A=C3=A8 =C5=BE',r=B0=C2=A1=C2=B6=C3=9A=7F=C3=BD=C3=BA+=C2=BAk&j=C3=9A=C3=A8=C5 =BE',r=B0=C2h=C2=B8=C2=AC=C2=B4*'=C2=B6=C2=B8=BA=C2=BA=C3=98=C2 =A8=C2=9Dg=BAJ+^N=16=C2=A7=9C*.~=C5-=C3=B2=C2=A2=C3=C3-zw =C2=AB=C2=A2=C3=AB,=C2=BA=C5=A1h=C2=AE=C3=93=1A=C2=B6=C3=90=C3=ABjY^.+-=01=C3 =99=C2=A2=C2=9D=C2=A8ky=C3=B8m=C2=B6=C5=B8=C3=C3=83=0C&j=C3=9A=C3=A8=C5=BE ',r=B0=C2r=B0=C3=AD=C2=AE&=C3=AE=C2=B6*'-=C3=9Bi=C3 =C3=BC0=C3=82f=C2=AD=C2=AE=B0=C3=A2r=C3=87(=BA=C3=B7(=C5=BE=C3=9A =C3=A2n=C3=ABb=C2=A2=7F=C3=9A=C3=BD=C2=C3=9F=C2=A2{=7F=C2=C2=B7=C2n =A1r=C3=BE=1Bf ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Piet on eBay
From: "jarheadpilot82" <jarheadpilot82(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 11, 2015
I don't understand why someone puts a VSI in the panel of a VFR airplane like a Piet. A Pitts - maybe. A Piet? I don't get it. -------- Semper Fi, Terry Hand Athens, GA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438244#438244 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Hot Mag Fatality.
From: "DaveG601XL" <david.m.gallagher(at)ge.com>
Date: Feb 11, 2015
Hearing William mention Gary Collins makes me miss him all the more. I live close to Gary's house and airfield and we were good friends. I had just flown to his place the week before to perform a new weight and balance on the Tailwind he bought out of Baraboo. I installed and tracked the replacement propeller we put on the Tailwind before the new owner flew it out months after the accident. That was another heart wrenching day. I always had propeller safety in mind, but Gary's accident really made it personal for me. We lost a great friend and pilot that day. Be safe out there! -------- David Gallagher Zodiac 601 XL-B: flying, 280+ hours now Next project under construction: Finish my father's Aircamper Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438245#438245 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Piet on eBay
From: "Jeff Boatright" <jeffboatright(at)emory.edu>
Date: Feb 11, 2015
jarheadpilot82 wrote: > I don't understand why someone puts a VSI in the panel of a VFR airplane like a Piet. A Pitts - maybe. A Piet? I don't get it. Not to be a contrarian, but I think I see why someone would want one -- it's fun to throttle back to create a descent rate similar to a glider, and then go thermaling. My former hangarmate has a VSI in his Pup and is a former glider pilot and goes thermaling a lot. He got me onto this sort of fun flying. He claims that a VSI allows him to better monitor the ups and downs. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438246#438246 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Piet on eBay
From: "jarheadpilot82" <jarheadpilot82(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 11, 2015
Jeff, Makes sense. I would just get the smallest one I could find. You don't need a big one to ride the thermals. On second thought, with my eyes, I probably need the big one... [Wink] -------- Semper Fi, Terry Hand Athens, GA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438247#438247 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 12, 2015
Subject: Re: Piet on eBay
From: Matt Paxton <woodflier(at)aol.com>
I've been a glider pilot for 45 years and the idea of thermalling and ridge soaring my Piet never occurred to me. I'm definitely going to try it. In keeping with the tradition of the design, an old pellet variometer would be cool to install. The green pellet goes up and you're climbing, the red pellet goes up...well, that's what I'd see most often. Matt Paxton NX629ML ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: jarheadpilot82 <jarheadpilot82(at)hotmail.com> Date: Feb 11, 2015 10:46 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Piet on eBay Cc: > > Jeff, > > Makes sense. > > I would just get the smallest one I could find. You don't need a big one to ride the thermals. On second thought, with my eyes, I probably need the big one... [Wink] > > -------- > Semper Fi, > > Terry Hand > Athens, GA > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438247#438247 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Piet on eBay
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Feb 12, 2015
I hava a variometer in my plane. I put it in there to fill the hole where my compass once lived. The compass was unreliable in that part of my panel. Anyway, it turns out that it is a very useful gauge. I fly around a lot of mountains here in So Ca. The slightest up or down draft has a big effect on the piets performance. My variometer reads in vertical knots. I did the math and one knot vertical is almost exactly 100 feet per minute. The variometer is much more sensitive than the standard VSI. If you can find one I say get it and have some fun with it. Oh, the Piet on EBAY was at our West coast gathering last year. I believe the gentleman who owns it is not the builder. That C-90 engine on the front makes the plane a good performer. The engine sticks out front a long way, probably because of all the weight in the rear cockpit. I remember it being a well built plane. -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438251#438251 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Philips" <jack(at)bedfordlandings.com>
Subject: Re: Piet on eBay
Date: Feb 12, 2015
I put a VSI in my Pietenpol primarily because I was given one as a wedding presence (I still have the VSI, but not that wife. She was just a "Practice" wife). I have found it to be pretty useful, particularly when flying to Brodhead across West Virginia. I usually stop at Beckley for fuel. The airport at Beckley is located in the New River Gorge, and is surrounded by mountains. A takeoff with a heavily loaded Pietenpol on a hot day invariably involves flying around the gorge looking for lift or thermals in order to climb over the mountains on either side of the gorge. The VSI helps a lot (a variometer would be even better). Jack Phillips NX899JP Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of jarheadpilot82 Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:47 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Piet on eBay --> Jeff, Makes sense. I would just get the smallest one I could find. You don't need a big one to ride the thermals. On second thought, with my eyes, I probably need the big one... [Wink] -------- Semper Fi, Terry Hand Athens, GA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438247#438247 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jack <fastnaught(at)windstream.net>
Subject: Re: Piet on eBay
Date: Feb 12, 2015
Hello Jack, Several of us are doing some early planning to fly to Brodhead this year as a "gaggle" of Piets. I'm beginning from basically Columbia, SC. I'll be going west to hopefully join up with the Ga. Group then north to join the Tn group and then on to Brodhead. It would be great if you could join us. The plans at this point are only draft so any changes are fully open. Please give your thoughts. Thank Jack Sent from my iPad > On Feb 12, 2015, at 10:02 AM, Jack Philips wrote: > > > I put a VSI in my Pietenpol primarily because I was given one as a wedding > presence (I still have the VSI, but not that wife. She was just a > "Practice" wife). I have found it to be pretty useful, particularly when > flying to Brodhead across West Virginia. I usually stop at Beckley for > fuel. The airport at Beckley is located in the New River Gorge, and is > surrounded by mountains. A takeoff with a heavily loaded Pietenpol on a hot > day invariably involves flying around the gorge looking for lift or thermals > in order to climb over the mountains on either side of the gorge. The VSI > helps a lot (a variometer would be even better). > > Jack Phillips > NX899JP > Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of > jarheadpilot82 > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:47 PM > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Piet on eBay > > --> > > Jeff, > > Makes sense. > > I would just get the smallest one I could find. You don't need a big one to > ride the thermals. On second thought, with my eyes, I probably need the big > one... [Wink] > > -------- > Semper Fi, > > Terry Hand > Athens, GA > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438247#438247 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Philips" <jack(at)bedfordlandings.com>
Subject: Re: Piet on eBay
Date: Feb 12, 2015
Hi Jack, I'm planning to go to Brodhead, but not in my Pietenpol. My wife will be joining me for the first time so we're going to be flying up in our Cessna 170B. I've flown my Piet there 5 times, and that's enough. I'm tired of struggling to make it over the mountains and under the inevitable weather. The Cessna is fully instrument equipped and better suited for flying a long trip. Maybe some other year, if she's not going and the weather is perfect, I'll take the Piet back to Brodhead. Going around the mountains and up from Tennessee should be a much easier way to go than flying over West Virginia. Several times I have come home that way, after making a stop in west Tennessee to visit my Mom. Flying back to the Carolinas by way of Huntsville, AL and Rome, GA avoids the highest of the mountains and the worst of the weather. Contrast these two views - the first is the typical terrain I find flying over West Virginia: And here is what it looks like flying over the Midwest: You decide which place you'd rather be in the event of a forced landing. Jack Phillips NX899JP Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jack Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 11:07 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Piet on eBay fastnaught(at)windstream.net> Hello Jack, Several of us are doing some early planning to fly to Brodhead this year as a "gaggle" of Piets. I'm beginning from basically Columbia, SC. I'll be going west to hopefully join up with the Ga. Group then north to join the Tn group and then on to Brodhead. It would be great if you could join us. The plans at this point are only draft so any changes are fully open. Please give your thoughts. Thank Jack Sent from my iPad > On Feb 12, 2015, at 10:02 AM, Jack Philips < jack(at)bedfordlandings.com> wrote: > > --> < jack(at)bedfordlandings.com> > > I put a VSI in my Pietenpol primarily because I was given one as a > wedding presence (I still have the VSI, but not that wife. She was > just a "Practice" wife). I have found it to be pretty useful, > particularly when flying to Brodhead across West Virginia. I usually > stop at Beckley for fuel. The airport at Beckley is located in the > New River Gorge, and is surrounded by mountains. A takeoff with a > heavily loaded Pietenpol on a hot day invariably involves flying > around the gorge looking for lift or thermals in order to climb over > the mountains on either side of the gorge. The VSI helps a lot (a variometer would be even better). > > Jack Phillips > NX899JP > Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia > > -----Original Message----- > From: <mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com> owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com > [ mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of > jarheadpilot82 > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:47 PM > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Piet on eBay > > --> < jarheadpilot82(at)hotmail.com> > > Jeff, > > Makes sense. > > I would just get the smallest one I could find. You don't need a big > one to ride the thermals. On second thought, with my eyes, I probably > need the big one... [Wink] > > -------- > Semper Fi, > > Terry Hand > Athens, GA > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > <http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438247#438247> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438247#438247 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List http://www.matronics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Piet on eBay
From: "wheelharp" <wheelharp(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 12, 2015
> Contrast these two views - the first is the typical terrain I find flying over West Virginia: Jack P, I have often dreamed of coming over to the B&B with my wife when my Piet is done, but I've looked at sat images, and looks like it would be some pretty serious rock hopping to get there from Missouri (I fly field to field like i'm jumping from stone to stone crossing a creek) On the other hand, a trip to Brodhead for me would be 73 NM to Carlyle lake in Illinois, then- straight north and 238 NM of green quilt squares! -------- Jon Jones Ironton, MO Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438264#438264 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Philips" <jack(at)bedfordlandings.com>
Subject: Re: Piet on eBay
Date: Feb 12, 2015
That's one of the reasons no one has yet flown a Pietenpol here to spend the night. Matt Paxton has stayed here at our Bed & Breakfast, and he's flown his Pietenpol here, but not at the same time. South and east of here the terrain is fine. North and west there are some serious mountains (not as high as the Rockies, but about as tall above the surrounding terrain). Flying from here to Beckley in a straight line I have to get to at least 5,000' to have reasonable clearance over the mountains, and to feel comfortable I like to get to 6,000'. Since our field elevation here is just under a thousand feet, and at those altitudes a heavily loaded Pietenpol climbs at about 150 feet per minute, I'm looking at climbing steadily for over half an hour. Flying here requires careful study of the terrain. For example, flying a straight line between here and Matt's field you've got to cross a peak on the Blue Ridge that is 4,225' MSL at the summit. But by bending just a bit east of course, and following the valley of the James River you can cut through a gap in the Blue Ridge and never have to get above 2500'. Of course there's no place to land but the river if you lose the engine, but you get used to that. Jack Phillips NX899JP Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of wheelharp Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 1:33 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Piet on eBay > Contrast these two views - the first is the typical terrain I find flying over West Virginia: Jack P, I have often dreamed of coming over to the B&B with my wife when my Piet is done, but I've looked at sat images, and looks like it would be some pretty serious rock hopping to get there from Missouri (I fly field to field like i'm jumping from stone to stone crossing a creek) On the other hand, a trip to Brodhead for me would be 73 NM to Carlyle lake in Illinois, then- straight north and 238 NM of green quilt squares! -------- Jon Jones Ironton, MO Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438264#438264 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jack <fastnaught(at)windstream.net>
Subject: Re: Piet on eBay
Date: Feb 12, 2015
Jack, Thanks for the reply. I fully understand. Look forward to meeting you. Jack Sent from my iPad > On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:44 AM, Jack Philips wrot e: > > Hi Jack, > > I'm planning to go to Brodhead, but not in my Pietenpol. My wife will be j oining me for the first time so we're going to be flying up in our Cessna 17 0B. I've flown my Piet there 5 times, and that's enough. I'm tired of stru ggling to make it over the mountains and under the inevitable weather. The C essna is fully instrument equipped and better suited for flying a long trip. Maybe some other year, if she's not going and the weather is perfect, I'll take the Piet back to Brodhead. > > Going around the mountains and up from Tennessee should be a much easier w ay to go than flying over West Virginia. Several times I have come home tha t way, after making a stop in west Tennessee to visit my Mom. Flying back t o the Carolinas by way of Huntsville, AL and Rome, GA avoids the highest o f the mountains and the worst of the weather. > > Contrast these two views - the first is the typical terrain I find flying o ver West Virginia: > > > > And here is what it looks like flying over the Midwest: > > > > You decide which place you=99d rather be in the event of a forced la nding. > > Jack Phillips > NX899JP > Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-li st-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jack > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 11:07 AM > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Piet on eBay > > > Hello Jack, > Several of us are doing some early planning to fly to Brodhead this year a s a "gaggle" of Piets. I'm beginning from basically Columbia, SC. I'll be go ing west to hopefully join up with the Ga. Group then north to join the Tn g roup and then on to Brodhead. It would be great if you could join us. The pl ans at this point are only draft so any changes are fully open. Please give y our thoughts. > Thank > Jack > > Sent from my iPad > > > On Feb 12, 2015, at 10:02 AM, Jack Philips wr ote: > > > > --> > > > > I put a VSI in my Pietenpol primarily because I was given one as a > > wedding presence (I still have the VSI, but not that wife. She was > > just a "Practice" wife). I have found it to be pretty useful, > > particularly when flying to Brodhead across West Virginia. I usually > > stop at Beckley for fuel. The airport at Beckley is located in the > > New River Gorge, and is surrounded by mountains. A takeoff with a > > heavily loaded Pietenpol on a hot day invariably involves flying > > around the gorge looking for lift or thermals in order to climb over > > the mountains on either side of the gorge. The VSI helps a lot (a vario meter would be even better). > > > > Jack Phillips > > NX899JP > > Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com > > [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of > > jarheadpilot82 > > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:47 PM > > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Piet on eBay > > > > --> > > > > Jeff, > > > > Makes sense. > > > > I would just get the smallest one I could find. You don't need a big > > one to ride the thermals. On second thought, with my eyes, I probably > > need the big one... [Wink] > > > > -------- > > Semper Fi, > > > > Terry Hand > > Athens, GA > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438247#438247 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List > > http://forums.matronics.com > > http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Pietenpol biplane project-- Glen
From: "William Wynne" <WilliamTCA(at)aol.com>
Date: Feb 13, 2015
Glen, I don't remember who taught it to me, but I really like the saying . "The Early bird gets the worm, but the Second mouse gets the cheese." . The implication is that the first mouse got his head caught in the trap. CA glue would probably work fine, but do you really want to be that first mouse? . In the conversion manual I teach people the ww axiom of airplane building " It isn't the probability of being right it is the cost of being wrong." Example: Being 95% sure your paint will not peel is fine, but being 95% sure your wing spar will not break is not acceptable because they have different costs associated with the undesirable outcome. . Just use T-88 and you will never have to think about it again. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438298#438298 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Pietenpol biplane project-- Glen
From: Kip Gardner <kipgohio1957(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 13, 2015
Another one in the same vein: "It just proves that the worm should have stayed in bed" On Feb 13, 2015, at 5:42 AM, William Wynne wrote: > > Glen, > > > > I don't remember who taught it to me, but I really like the saying > > . > > > "The Early bird gets the worm, but the Second mouse gets the cheese." > > . > > > > The implication is that the first mouse got his head caught in the trap. CA glue would probably work fine, but do you really want to be that first mouse? > > . > > > In the conversion manual I teach people the ww axiom of airplane building " It isn't the probability of being right it is the cost of being wrong." Example: Being 95% sure your paint will not peel is fine, but being 95% sure your wing spar will not break is not acceptable because they have different costs associated with the undesirable outcome. > > . > > Just use T-88 and you will never have to think about it again. > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438298#438298 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Pietenpol biplane project-- Glen
From: glenschweizer(at)yahoo.com
Date: Feb 13, 2015
Thank you for the replies. No first mouse issues(thanks William). I'll be using T88 for ribs. Currently kitting all ribs for top wing. That's a lot of little sticks! Thanks again. Glen Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:03 AM, Kip Gardner wrote: > > > Another one in the same vein: > > "It just proves that the worm should have stayed in bed" > > >> On Feb 13, 2015, at 5:42 AM, William Wynne wrote: >> >> >> Glen, >> >> >> >> I don't remember who taught it to me, but I really like the saying >> >> . >> >> >> "The Early bird gets the worm, but the Second mouse gets the cheese." >> >> . >> >> >> >> The implication is that the first mouse got his head caught in the trap. CA glue would probably work fine, but do you really want to be that first mouse? >> >> . >> >> >> In the conversion manual I teach people the ww axiom of airplane building " It isn't the probability of being right it is the cost of being wrong." Example: Being 95% sure your paint will not peel is fine, but being 95% sure your wing spar will not break is not acceptable because they have different costs associated with the undesirable outcome. >> >> . >> >> Just use T-88 and you will never have to think about it again. >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438298#438298 > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Varnish
From: Scott Knowlton <flyingscott_k(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 13, 2015
There is something beyond description when the first coat of varnish goes on the fuselage after hundreds of iterations of clamping procedures, sanding, h ead scratching , fitting, scratching again, and fine carpentry. I can hear a popping sound in my shop as the airframe goes from a dusty light coloured g rain -less contraption to a fine wooden piece of antiquity!!! Sorry for the verbosity but those of you have reached this point must be able to relate t o my absolute fulfillment... Those of you yet to reach this hallmark I encou rage you to continue the journey. It is most definitely worth it. Scott Knowlton. Sent from my iPhone ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 13, 2015
Subject: Re: Varnish
From: "Charles N. Campbell" <charlescampbell1924(at)gmail.com>
Speaking of varnishing the fuselage I'm about to that point. Someone wrote recently that he thinned the varnish. Anyone know how much to thin it? I asked once before but got no response. Chuck On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Scott Knowlton wrote: > There is something beyond description when the first coat of varnish goes > on the fuselage after hundreds of iterations of clamping procedures, > sanding, head scratching , fitting, scratching again, and fine carpentry. > I can hear a popping sound in my shop as the airframe goes from a dusty > light coloured grain -less contraption to a fine wooden piece of > antiquity!!! Sorry for the verbosity but those of you have reached this > point must be able to relate to my absolute fulfillment... Those of you yet > to reach this hallmark I encourage you to continue the journey. It is most > definitely worth it. > > Scott Knowlton. > > > Sent from my iPhone > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Varnish
From: "Lorenzo" <larharris2(at)msn.com>
Date: Feb 13, 2015
I'm just doing some varnishing of my own. First coat on the fuselage. Minwax Helmsman spar urethane, full strength, straight from the can. Spread with a Harbor Freight throwaway bristle brush (and picking out the occasional loose hair). Lorenzo Tellico Plains, TN Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438320#438320 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 13, 2015
From: Chris Tracy <catdesigns(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Varnish
My notes say thin on a- 50/50 ratio first coat. Full strength there after . =0A=0AChris Tracy=0ASent from AT&T Mail on Android=0A=0A ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Varnish
From: Scott Knowlton <flyingscott_k(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 13, 2015
I used helmsman straight from the can. It's pretty thin and I suspect you'd g et runs if you thinned it out. Scott Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 13, 2015, at 1:53 PM, "Charles N. Campbell" wrote: > > Speaking of varnishing the fuselage I'm about to that point. Someone wrot e recently that he thinned the varnish. Anyone know how much to thin it? I asked once before but got no response. Chuck > >> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Scott Knowlton wrote: >> There is something beyond description when the first coat of varnish goes on the fuselage after hundreds of iterations of clamping procedures, sandin g, head scratching , fitting, scratching again, and fine carpentry. I can h ear a popping sound in my shop as the airframe goes from a dusty light colou red grain -less contraption to a fine wooden piece of antiquity!!! Sorry fo r the verbosity but those of you have reached this point must be able to rel ate to my absolute fulfillment... Those of you yet to reach this hallmark I e ncourage you to continue the journey. It is most definitely worth it. >> >> Scott Knowlton. >> >> >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone > > > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Philips" <jack(at)bedfordlandings.com>
Subject: Varnish
Date: Feb 13, 2015
That's what I did, Chris. First coat thinned 50/50, full strength after that. The theory behind this is that thinning it allows the varnish to penetrate beneath the surface, then subsequent coats bond to that first coat much more strongly, preventing the varnish from just peeling off in a few years. Jack Phillips NX899JP Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Chris Tracy Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 3:28 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Varnish My notes say thin on a 50/50 ratio first coat. Full strength there after. Chris Tracy Sent from AT&T Mail on Android From:"Charles N. Campbell" > Date:Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:51 AM Subject:Re: Pietenpol-List: Varnish Speaking of varnishing the fuselage I'm about to that point. Someone wrote recently that he thinned the varnish. Anyone know how much to thin it? I asked once before but got no response. Chuck On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Scott Knowlton > wrote: There is something beyond description when the first coat of varnish goes on the fuselage after hundreds of iterations of clamping procedures, sanding, head scratching , fitting, scratching again, and fine carpentry. I can hear a popping sound in my shop as the airframe goes from a dusty light coloured grain -less contraption to a fine wooden piece of antiquity!!! Sorry for the verbosity but those of you have reached this point must be able to relate to my absolute fulfillment... Those of you yet to reach this hallmark I encourage you to continue the journey. It is most definitely worth it. Scott Knowlton. Sent from my iPhone http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listw" target="_blank" href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://====================== ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 13, 2015
From: Charles Burkholder <born2fly(at)abcmailbox.net>
Subject: Re: Varnish
Very nice Scott! On 2/13/2015 1:38 PM, Scott Knowlton wrote: > There is something beyond description when the first coat of varnish goes on the fuselage after hundreds of iterations of clamping procedures, sanding, head scratching , fitting, scratching again, and fine carpentry. I can hear a popping sound in my shop as the airframe goes from a dusty light coloured grain -less contraption to a fine wooden piece of antiquity!!! Sorry for the verbosity but those of you have reached this point must be able to relate to my absolute fulfillment... Those of you yet to reach this hallmark I encourage you to continue the journey. It is most definitely worth it. > > Scott Knowlton. > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com -- Charles Burkholder Visit my blog @ http://missionmechfund.blogspot.ca/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Wavy grain in capstrip
From: "Pocono John" <tinmotion(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Feb 13, 2015
Just discovered this wave in the grain of a rib top capstrip where two diagonals meet at gussets. The other side doesn't show the wave as far as I can see. Not sure if it's acceptable or not, but I was thinking of gluing additional pieces of capstrip on both sides of the diagonals like Tony shows in "The Sportplane Builder" page 67. Is it strange it's not on both sides? I plan to show my EAA counselor too, just wanted to share. Thanks. -------- John Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438335#438335 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/pietprob1_614.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/pietprob2_209.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/pietprob3_385.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wavy grain in capstrip
From: "tools" <n0kkj(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Feb 13, 2015
It's wood... Lots of natural variation. Cap strips aren't structural, it'll be fine. Tools Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438337#438337 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wavy grain in capstrip
From: "Pocono John" <tinmotion(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Feb 13, 2015
Thanks! The piece annoys me though, so maybe I'll just replace it. -------- John Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438338#438338 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wavy grain in capstrip
From: "tools" <n0kkj(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Feb 13, 2015
It also occurs within the confines of gusset plates, a butt joint would be fine there. Tools Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438339#438339 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Varnish
From: Andy Hoots <eflyerc5(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Feb 14, 2015
Nice looking fuse Scott. I hope to have Pietenpol Pietenpol components littering my garage in the near future. Keep up the good work. Andy Hoots Shiloh, IL Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 13, 2015, at 12:38, Scott Knowlton wrote: > > There is something beyond description when the first coat of varnish goes on the fuselage after hundreds of iterations of clamping procedures, sanding, head scratching , fitting, scratching again, and fine carpentry. I can hear a popping sound in my shop as the airframe goes from a dusty light coloured grain -less contraption to a fine wooden piece of antiquity!!! Sorry for the verbosity but those of you have reached this point must be able to relate to my absolute fulfillment... Those of you yet to reach this hallmark I encourage you to continue the journey. It is most definitely worth it. > > Scott Knowlton. > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 14, 2015
From: Jim Boyer <boyerjrb(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Varnish
Very nice Scott. Varnish adds a beautiful color to that great woodwork. Too bad it has to be covered. Cheers, Jim B. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 14, 2015
From: Jim Boyer <boyerjrb(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Varnish
That's exactly the way I varnished mine Lorenzo. Cheers, Jim B. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Varnish
From: Scott Knowlton <flyingscott_k(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 14, 2015
In fairness I guess the builder knows it's there. Scott Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 14, 2015, at 11:27 AM, "Jim Boyer" wrote: > > Very nice Scott. Varnish adds a beautiful color to that great woodwork. To o bad it has to be covered. > Cheers, Jim B. > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wavy grain in capstrip
From: "William Wynne" <WilliamTCA(at)aol.com>
Date: Feb 14, 2015
Dear vice air marshal Tools: I don't think it is going to down the plane either, but can you explain how you don't think of capstrips as "structural"? To my way of thinking, you do a 3 G pull up at 1200 lbs and the plane generated 3,600 pounds of lift, which near 100% is generated against the wing fabric....which is only contacting the capstrips... so they are not structural how? I learned the fabric trade working in Willie Carter's hangar at 207 Cessna Blvd Spruce Creek. Almost all work was competition aerobatic biplanes, almost all Pitts S-1S and S-2Bs. Capstrips in a Pitts are a lot smaller than a Piet, but they have much smaller stick lengths and the ribs are twice as close. I never saw a spar damaged by a flight load (just landing accidents) but I did see plenty of ribs that were broken by flight loads. My conclusion, they are structural. -ww. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438358#438358 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Usable fuel--- gravity flow fuel systems
Date: Feb 15, 2015
Mike, That was a timely post that I put aside until I had time to read it. I am rebuilding a Baby Ace that suffered a bit in an off-field dead stick landing. While flushing the tank, and checking for residual contamination, I noticed a very poor rate of fuel flow. The pictures are self explanatory. Gary Boothe NX308MB From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-LME0)[Vantage Partners, LLC] Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 9:25 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Usable fuel--- gravity flow fuel systems http://spirit.eaa.org/apps/magazines/eaa_articles/1973_03_05.pdf I've attached a good fuel system article by Tony Bingelis but if you have the books by Tony Bingelis he will show you how to install a flawless fuel system and also show you how to exactly calculate how much fuel you have that is usable an unusable in your system. I have a 17 gallon nose tank and I did the prescribed static fuel flow measurements for my Piet setup on a earthen barn ramp that was in the back of an old farmhouse I was renting while building. The barn ramp simulated my plane at a climb angle and the fuel flow was measured into a Rubbermaid iced-tea container which had both ml and oz graduations on it. That, a stopwatch on my watch (now cell phone stop watches work great) and some fuel and I all I needed. The method Bingelis suggests puts the plane in a climb attitude and his calculations account for a full-power climb out situation. Those four books are worth their weight in platinum or gold (depending on which is higher!) Best $89 you'll ever spend on your Pietenpol! https://www.eaa.org/en/eaa-shop/homebuilders_corner/2251598800000__bingelis- set-of-4 Mike C. Ohio ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 15, 2015
Subject: setting up a Push to talk intercom
From: Steven Dortch <steven.d.dortch(at)gmail.com>
Hello good people! I have a sigtronics intercom and would like to set it up with PTT for intercom, not voice activated. I don't want to spend much money (My wife says I am cheap, I say I am frugal.) I want it so that both the pilot and passenger have to push a button to talk to each other. I would like the passenger to be able to hear my radio transmissions. I want to install them on the stick. I have a grip with buttons for both intercom and radio (and bombs, rockets and guns!) for the pilot. (I have a wood knob that I can drill out for the passenger.) How do I hook that up? I do best with pictures. -- Blue Skies, Steve D ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 15, 2015
Subject: Re: setting up a Push to talk intercom
From: Marcus Zechini <marcus.zechini(at)gmail.com>
Steve: I think PTT is the way to go. I have vox, and have just figured out how to get it to be usable - leather mic covers. It's still difficult to communicate. I have a PTT input for pax, but I am trying to wire pilot stick mount (as opposed to handheld's PTT) before geting that ambitious. I butchered an old velcro yoke mount PTT and really have only used it to make a schematic. I DID get a couple of switches from Radio Shack before they will go under. In the mean time I moved hand-held to left side. I am lefty, so, of course ambidextrous and find left-throttle right stick natural. I look forward to seeing others post. I have wired mine at home, but after soldering connections it never works. Grrr. Zeke NX431LA Grega C-85-12 On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Steven Dortch wrote: > Hello good people! > > I have a sigtronics intercom and would like to set it up with PTT for > intercom, not voice activated. I don't want to spend much money (My wife > says I am cheap, I say I am frugal.) > > I want it so that both the pilot and passenger have to push a button to > talk to each other. I would like the passenger to be able to hear my radio > transmissions. I want to install them on the stick. > > I have a grip with buttons for both intercom and radio (and bombs, rockets > and guns!) for the pilot. (I have a wood knob that I can drill out for the > passenger.) > > How do I hook that up? I do best with pictures. > > > -- > Blue Skies, > Steve D > > * > > > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wavy grain in capstrip
From: "Pocono John" <tinmotion(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Feb 15, 2015
I'll cut the nose and rear of this rib free to use in the center section. As always, I appreciate reading answers and opinions. -------- John Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438379#438379 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: No worry "kitting" for wing
From: "bdewenter" <anonymouse(at)woh.rr.com>
Date: Feb 16, 2015
This subject came up again in another thread....If "kitting" means mass production of the roughly 15 individual pieces to make a rib, and the gussets, I completed my entire wing kit in about 4 hours total work. So for any lurkers out there thinking it takes a bazillion hours, don't fret any longer. By using a miter saw, and a stop block how long does it take to cut 35 or so identical pieces of spruce? Rinse lather repeat. A 24" x 8' foot section of 1/16" aircraft grade ply goes into roughly 20 7/8" (or so) x 8' foot strips in under 5 minutes with a table saw. Then 10 so of those get taped together and run under the afore mentioned chop saw to make gussets "masters". The masters get formed into finish parts using some simple hand tools like a tin snip. You will want to mark some large baggies to hold your rib pieces and some plastic containers to hold the 1,100 (+/-) gussets that come from the single sheet of ply. Its all quite enjoyable too! -------- Bob 'Early Builder' Dewenter Dayton OH Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438418#438418 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: No worry "kitting" for wing
From: "Lorenzo" <larharris2(at)msn.com>
Date: Feb 16, 2015
I wholeheartedly agree. It is not very difficult or tedious, although my techniques were a bit different. For the wing rib gussets, I cut them all out with a 2-inch hole saw. Then trimmed with snips to halves or quarters, at the proper angles, as I used them. Lengths of capstrip were cut to length, then finished to proper angles (again as I used them) with a 12-inch benchtop disc sander. Piece of cake. The most tedious part was in getting only one rib completed per day. I used T-88 and clamping pressure only (no nails). So I could only process one rib overnight through my rib jig. Lorenzo Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438421#438421 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "JERRY" <jerry(at)SKYCLASSIC.NET>
Subject: setting up a Push to talk intercom
Date: Feb 16, 2015
I have a Micoair with a built in intercom and I have a two way switch (push down to talk to the person in front and push up two talk to the world). From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Steven Dortch Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 4:52 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: setting up a Push to talk intercom Hello good people! I have a sigtronics intercom and would like to set it up with PTT for intercom, not voice activated. I don't want to spend much money (My wife says I am cheap, I say I am frugal.) I want it so that both the pilot and passenger have to push a button to talk to each other. I would like the passenger to be able to hear my radio transmissions. I want to install them on the stick. I have a grip with buttons for both intercom and radio (and bombs, rockets and guns!) for the pilot. (I have a wood knob that I can drill out for the passenger.) How do I hook that up? I do best with pictures. -- Blue Skies, Steve D ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Wing flex, the need for struts..
From: Ray Krause <raykrause(at)frontiernet.net>
Date: Feb 17, 2015
Who says we need wing struts, a little wing flex just adds to the beauty. Wi th the proper engineering.... > https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GZRKm6PG918 Sorry, but I could not resist the beauty of this video. I guess we are still learning from God's little creatures, the birds. Ray Krause Sent from my iPad ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: No worry "kitting" for wing
From: "PatrickW" <pwhoyt(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Feb 17, 2015
Used this approach to make all the parts for a pair of wings on my current project. Was fun and very satisfying. Made all the "master" pieces for one rib, got them all the way I wanted them, then duplicated each piece as many times as needed. Make two dozen "part A's", then two dozen "part B's", etc, etc, until they're all done. Organized each part in separate ziplock bags, with labels. After all the pieces were made, I used one Rib Jig, and made one rib per night. In a month all the ribs were done. The same methodology works well for other parts that need to be duplicated. Make the first one, then make some more just like it. "Measure twice, cut a couple dozen times." Two related articles here, with some pictures: www.eaa25.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/OnFinal201404.pdf www.eaa25.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/OnFinal201403.pdf Patrick Hoyt N63PZ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438445#438445 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Boatright, Jeffrey" <jeffboatright(at)emory.edu>
Subject: Re: Wing flex, the need for struts..
Date: Feb 17, 2015
R2VlemUsIHBhcnRzIG9mIHRoYXQgdmlkZW8gYXJlIHNvIOKApiBkcmFtYXRpYyAoPykg4oCmIHRo YXQgaXQgYWxtb3N0IGxvb2tzIGxpa2UgQ0dJIHJhdGhlciB0aGFuIGEgcmVhbCBjcmV3IGZseWlu ZyBhIHJlYWwgYWlycGxhbmUuIEl04oCZcyBwcmV0dHkgYW1hemluZyB3aGF0IHRoZSBjdXJyZW50 IGdlbmVyYXRpb24gYWlybGluZXJzIGNhbiBkbyB3aGVuIGxpZ2h0bHkgbG9hZGVkIGFuZCB3aXRo b3V0IHBhc3NlbmdlcnMuDQoNCg0KRnJvbTogUmF5IEtyYXVzZSA8cmF5a3JhdXNlQGZyb250aWVy bmV0Lm5ldDxtYWlsdG86cmF5a3JhdXNlQGZyb250aWVybmV0Lm5ldD4+DQpSZXBseS1UbzogInBp ZXRlbnBvbC1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb208bWFpbHRvOnBpZXRlbnBvbC1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmlj cy5jb20+IiA8cGlldGVucG9sLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbTxtYWlsdG86cGlldGVucG9sLWxp c3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbT4+DQpEYXRlOiBUdWVzZGF5LCBGZWJydWFyeSAxNywgMjAxNSBhdCAx MDo1MCBBTQ0KVG86ICJwaWV0ZW5wb2wtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tPG1haWx0bzpwaWV0ZW5w b2wtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tPiIgPHBpZXRlbnBvbC1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb208bWFp bHRvOnBpZXRlbnBvbC1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20+Pg0KU3ViamVjdDogUGlldGVucG9sLUxp c3Q6IFdpbmcgZmxleCwgdGhlIG5lZWQgZm9yIHN0cnV0cy4uDQoNCg0KV2hvIHNheXMgd2UgbmVl ZCB3aW5nIHN0cnV0cywgYSBsaXR0bGUgd2luZyBmbGV4IGp1c3QgYWRkcyB0byB0aGUgYmVhdXR5 LiBXaXRoIHRoZSBwcm9wZXIgZW5naW5lZXJpbmcuLi4uDQoNCmh0dHBzOi8vbS55b3V0dWJlLmNv bS93YXRjaD92PUdaUkttNlBHOTE4DQoNClNvcnJ5LCBidXQgSSBjb3VsZCBub3QgcmVzaXN0IHRo ZSBiZWF1dHkgb2YgdGhpcyB2aWRlby4gSSBndWVzcyB3ZSBhcmUgc3RpbGwgbGVhcm5pbmcgZnJv bSBHb2QncyBsaXR0bGUgY3JlYXR1cmVzLCB0aGUgYmlyZHMuDQoNClJheSBLcmF1c2UNCg0KDQpT ZW50IGZyb20gbXkgaVBhZA0KDQoNCg0KDQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f Xw0KDQpUaGlzIGUtbWFpbCBtZXNzYWdlIChpbmNsdWRpbmcgYW55IGF0dGFjaG1lbnRzKSBpcyBm b3IgdGhlIHNvbGUgdXNlIG9mDQp0aGUgaW50ZW5kZWQgcmVjaXBpZW50KHMpIGFuZCBtYXkgY29u dGFpbiBjb25maWRlbnRpYWwgYW5kIHByaXZpbGVnZWQNCmluZm9ybWF0aW9uLiBJZiB0aGUgcmVh ZGVyIG9mIHRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBpcyBub3QgdGhlIGludGVuZGVkDQpyZWNpcGllbnQsIHlvdSBh cmUgaGVyZWJ5IG5vdGlmaWVkIHRoYXQgYW55IGRpc3NlbWluYXRpb24sIGRpc3RyaWJ1dGlvbg0K b3IgY29weWluZyBvZiB0aGlzIG1lc3NhZ2UgKGluY2x1ZGluZyBhbnkgYXR0YWNobWVudHMpIGlz IHN0cmljdGx5DQpwcm9oaWJpdGVkLg0KDQpJZiB5b3UgaGF2ZSByZWNlaXZlZCB0aGlzIG1lc3Nh Z2UgaW4gZXJyb3IsIHBsZWFzZSBjb250YWN0DQp0aGUgc2VuZGVyIGJ5IHJlcGx5IGUtbWFpbCBt ZXNzYWdlIGFuZCBkZXN0cm95IGFsbCBjb3BpZXMgb2YgdGhlDQpvcmlnaW5hbCBtZXNzYWdlIChp bmNsdWRpbmcgYXR0YWNobWVudHMpLg0K ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ray Krause <raykrause(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: Wing flex, the need for struts..
Date: Feb 17, 2015
Thought they would roll it! Ray Krause Sent from my iPad > On Feb 17, 2015, at 8:23 AM, Boatright, Jeffrey w rote: > > Geeze, parts of that video are so =C3=A2=82=AC=C2 dramatic (?) =C3=A2 =82=AC=C2 that it almost looks like CGI rather than a real crew flying a real airplane. It=C3=A2=82=AC=84=A2s pretty amazing what the curren t generation airliners can do when lightly loaded and without passengers. > > > From: Ray Krause <raykrause(at)frontiernet.net> > Reply-To: "pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com" > Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 10:50 AM > To: "pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com" > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Wing flex, the need for struts.. > > > Who says we need wing struts, a little wing flex just adds to the beauty. W ith the proper engineering.... > >> https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GZRKm6PG918 > > Sorry, but I could not resist the beauty of this video. I guess we are sti ll learning from God's little creatures, the birds. > > Ray Krause > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of > the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged > information. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution > or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly > prohibited. > > If you have received this message in error, please contact > the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the > original message (including attachments). > =C2=C2=B7=BA~=B0=C3=AD=C2=B2,=C3=9E=C3=99=C3=8A%=C2=A2=C2=BD 4=C3=93M4}=C2=A7=1Er=B9=C2=AB=B0=C3=C3=A7{=07(=C2=BA=C2=B8=C5 =BE=C2=AD8^>'=C2=ADzzh=9D=C2=B8=C2=AC=C2=B4I=C5=A1=C5-Qh=C2=AE=C3=A9 =9D=C2=B1=C3=ABax=C3=86=C2=AD=C2=AE=B0=C3=A2r=C3=82=C3=A2=C2=B2=C3 =91^j=C3=9B=C2=ABz=C3=83Z=C2=BE(=1A=C2=B6=C5-=C3=AD=C2=A1=C2=BA=C3=A8=C3=82 =C3=87=C2=AD=C3=A9=C5=A1=C5=B8"=C3=A2=C2=B2=C3=9B=C2=AD=C5-X=C2=AD =B0=C3=AB,=C2=B9=C3=88Z=C2=B0=C2=B8=C2=AC=C2=B5I=C3J=C3=C3=ACr=C2 =B8=C2=A9=C2=B6*'=02=C2=B7!=C5-=C3=B7=99y=C2=C3=9C=9E:0=C5=BE Z=1Aw=C2=B0=C3=9A=C3=88=1A=C3=A8=C3=82=C3=87=9A=C2=ABE=01=03=C3 =A1=C2=A2=C3=9A,=C2=C3=9Ejwf=C2=B9=C3=88f=C2=B9=C3=88f=C2=A2=C2=B7 =C5=A1-=C2=B7=C5=B8-=C3=9Bi=C3=C3=BC0=C3=82f=C2=AD=C2=AE =B0=C3=A2r=C3=87(=BA=C3=B3Z=C2=BE(=1A=C2=B6=C5-=C3=8F=B0=C3 =AB^=C5=BE=C5=A1%.+--=C3=9Bi=C3=C3=BC0=C3=82f=C2=AD=C2=AE=B0 =C3=A2r=C3=87(=BA=C3=B3Z=C2=BE(=1A=C2=B6=C5-=C3=8F=B0=C3=AB^=C5 =BE=C5=A1%.+-=C3=BD=C2=A3M=13=C2=8D $=93=10=11NEC=12I=C2=A9=C5=BE =9A=C2=B7=C5=A1=C2=B5=C3=8A'=C2=B5=C3=A9=C3=ADj[(j=C3=B6=C2=A2=A2=C2 =C3=A5z=C3=B8=C5=A1=C2=B6=17=93y=C2=B1h=C2=AE=C3=A9=C2=ACj=1A=C3=9E~=1B m=C2=A7=C3=C3=9F=C2=A2=C2=BB=C2=C2=B2f=C2=AD=C2=AE=B0=C3=A2r=C3=87 (=C5=A1=1Bm=C2=A7=C3=C3=9F=C2=A2=C2=BB=C2=C2=B2f=C2=AD=C2=AE=B0=C3 =A2r=C3=87(=BA=C3=B6=B9=C5-=C3=8BB=C2=A2{k=B0=C2=BB=C2=AD =C5-=B0=C3'y=C2=B4=C2=A2=C2=B5=C3=A4=C3=A1jy2=C2=A2=C3=A7=C3=A8=C2 =AF*.=C2=AE=07=C2=A7z=C2=BA.=C2=B2=C3=8B=C2=A9=C2=C5-=C3=AD1=C2=ABm=0E=C2 =B6=C2=A5=A2=C3=A2=C3=A2=C2=B2=C3=90=1D=C5=A1)=C3=9A-=C2=B7=C5 =B8-=C3=9Bi=C3=C3=BC0=C3=82f=C2=AD=C2=AE=B0=C3=A2r=C3=87( =BA=C3=B7(=C5=BE=C3=9A=C3=A2n=C3=ABb=C2=A2xm=C2=B6=C5=B8=C3=C3=83=0C&j =C3=9A=C3=A8=C5=BE',r=B0=C2r=B0=C3=AD=C2=AE&=C3=AE=C2=B6*'=C3 =BD=C2=AF=C3=9B=C3=BD=C3=BA'=C2=B7=C3=BAk{=C3=B6=C3=A8w/=C3=A1=C2=B6i ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wing flex, the need for struts..
From: glenschweizer(at)yahoo.com
Date: Feb 17, 2015
Was hoping to see em roll it. What a graceful, beautiful aircraft! Way to g o Boeing! What could possibly be coming next? Glen Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 17, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Ray Krause wrote: > > Thought they would roll it! > > Ray Krause > > Sent from my iPad > >> On Feb 17, 2015, at 8:23 AM, Boatright, Jeffrey wrote: >> >> Geeze, parts of that video are so =C3=A2=82=AC=C2 dramatic (?) =C3=A2 =82=AC=C2 that it almost looks like CGI rather than a real crew flying a real airplane. It=C3=A2=82=AC=84=A2s pretty amazing what the curren t generation airliners can do when lightly loaded and without passengers. >> >> >> From: Ray Krause <raykrause(at)frontiernet.net> >> Reply-To: "pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com" >> Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 10:50 AM >> To: "pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com" >> Subject: Pietenpol-List: Wing flex, the need for struts.. >> >> >> Who says we need wing struts, a little wing flex just adds to the beauty. With the proper engineering.... >> >>> https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GZRKm6PG918 >> >> Sorry, but I could not resist the beauty of this video. I guess we are st ill learning from God's little creatures, the birds. >> >> Ray Krause >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> >> >> This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of >> the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged >> information. If the reader of this message is not the intended >> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution >> or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly >> prohibited. >> >> If you have received this message in error, please contact >> the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the >> original message (including attachments). >> =C2=C2=B7=BA~=B0=C3=AD=C2=B2,=C3=9E=C3=99=C3=8A%=C2=A2=C2=BD 4=C3=93M4}=C2=A7=1Er=B9=C2=AB=B0=C3=C3=A7{=07(=C2=BA=C2=B8=C5 =BE=C2=AD8^>'=C2=ADzzh=9D=C2=B8=C2=AC=C2=B4I=C5=A1=C5-Qh=C2=AE=C3=A9 =9D=C2=B1=C3=ABax=C3=86=C2=AD=C2=AE=B0=C3=A2r=C3=82=C3=A2=C2=B2=C3 =91^j=C3=9B=C2=ABz=C3=83Z=C2=BE(=1A=C2=B6=C5-=C3=AD=C2=A1=C2=BA=C3=A8=C3=82 =C3=87=C2=AD=C3=A9=C5=A1=C5=B8"=C3=A2=C2=B2=C3=9B=C2=AD=C5-X=C2=AD =B0=C3=AB,=C2=B9=C3=88Z=C2=B0=C2=B8=C2=AC=C2=B5I=C3J=C3=C3=ACr=C2 =B8=C2=A9=C2=B6*'=02=C2=B7!=C5-=C3=B7=99y=C2=C3=9C=9E:0=C5=BE Z=1Aw=C2=B0=C3=9A=C3=88=1A=C3=A8=C3=82=C3=87=9A=C2=ABE=01=03=C3 =A1=C2=A2=C3=9A,=C2=C3=9Ejwf=C2=B9=C3=88f=C2=B9=C3=88f=C2=A2=C2=B7 =C5=A1-=C2=B7=C5=B8-=C3=9Bi=C3=C3=BC0=C3=82f=C2=AD=C2=AE =B0=C3=A2r=C3=87(=BA=C3=B3Z=C2=BE(=1A=C2=B6=C5-=C3=8F=B0=C3 =AB^=C5=BE=C5=A1%.+--=C3=9Bi=C3=C3=BC0=C3=82f=C2=AD=C2=AE=B0 =C3=A2r=C3=87(=BA=C3=B3Z=C2=BE(=1A=C2=B6=C5-=C3=8F=B0=C3=AB^=C5 =BE=C5=A1%.+-=C3=BD=C2=A3M=13=C2=8D $=93=10=11NEC=12I=C2=A9=C5=BE =9A=C2=B7=C5=A1=C2=B5=C3=8A'=C2=B5=C3=A9=C3=ADj[(j=C3=B6=C2=A2=A2=C2 =C3=A5z=C3=B8=C5=A1=C2=B6=17=93y=C2=B1h=C2=AE=C3=A9=C2=ACj=1A=C3=9E~=1B m=C2=A7=C3=C3=9F=C2=A2=C2=BB=C2=C2=B2f=C2=AD=C2=AE=B0=C3=A2r=C3=87 (=C5=A1=1Bm=C2=A7=C3=C3=9F=C2=A2=C2=BB=C2=C2=B2f=C2=AD=C2=AE=B0=C3 =A2r=C3=87(=BA=C3=B6=B9=C5-=C3=8BB=C2=A2{k=B0=C2=BB=C2=AD =C5-=B0=C3'y=C2=B4=C2=A2=C2=B5=C3=A4=C3=A1jy2=C2=A2=C3=A7=C3=A8=C2 =AF*.=C2=AE=07=C2=A7z=C2=BA.=C2=B2=C3=8B=C2=A9=C2=C5-=C3=AD1=C2=ABm=0E=C2 =B6=C2=A5=A2=C3=A2=C3=A2=C2=B2=C3=90=1D=C5=A1)=C3=9A-=C2=B7=C5 =B8-=C3=9Bi=C3=C3=BC0=C3=82f=C2=AD=C2=AE=B0=C3=A2r=C3=87( =BA=C3=B7(=C5=BE=C3=9A=C3=A2n=C3=ABb=C2=A2xm=C2=B6=C5=B8=C3=C3=83=0C&j =C3=9A=C3=A8=C5=BE',r=B0=C2r=B0=C3=AD=C2=AE&=C3=AE=C2=B6*'=C3 =BD=C2=AF=C3=9B=C3=BD=C3=BA'=C2=B7=C3=BAk{=C3=B6=C3=A8w/=C3=A1=C2=B6i > > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wing flex, the need for struts..
From: j.petersen32(at)yahoo.com
Date: Feb 17, 2015
On Feb 17, 2015, at 10:50 AM, Ray Krause wrote: > > Who says we need wing struts, a little wing flex just adds to the beauty. W ith the proper engineering.... > >> https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GZRKm6PG918 > > Sorry, but I could not resist the beauty of this video. I guess we are sti ll learning from God's little creatures, the birds. > > Ray Krause > > > Sent from my iPad > > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-LME0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Subject: Scott varnishing!
Date: Feb 17, 2015
You are SO right Scott! Your airframe comes to life with a coat of varni sh and the character of the wood starts to shine thru! When you start covering you go thru this same kind of experience. I rememb er being sad that the woodwork was getting all covered up but at the same time I was thrilled to see airfoil and airframe shapes comi ng to life too! (plus when you varnish it makes your house or garage smell like you just pu rchased brand new hardwood furniture!!!!) Mike C. Ohio [cid:image001.jpg(at)01D04ACD.16C51430] ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Barry Davis" <bed(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Directions for Toolstock
Date: Feb 17, 2015
Mike I need the Google Maps street address for Toolstock. I am preparing detailed directions for Gardiner. Thanks Barry ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Barry Davis" <bed(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Wing flex, the need for struts..
Date: Feb 17, 2015
Like most Delta Pilots say: If I gotta be going.It better be Boeing BD From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ray Krause Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 10:51 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Wing flex, the need for struts.. Who says we need wing struts, a little wing flex just adds to the beauty. With the proper engineering.... https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GZRKm6PG918 Sorry, but I could not resist the beauty of this video. I guess we are still learning from God's little creatures, the birds. Ray Krause Sent from my iPad ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 17, 2015
From: "THOMAS.233327" <thomas.233327(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Wing flex, the need for struts..
I was hoping they would! I was there and watching when -80 (707 prototype) rolled over the Gold Cup Hydroplane Crowd of half a million soles or more! With the Blue Angles doing their antics before and after, I did not realize what I had just seen. My memory has that 707 really low(now that I know mo re), like 200-300 feet agl! It actually was on the "Show Line", the same di stance from the crowd as the Blue Angels were doing multiple rolls several hundred feet away from the crowd, but it's size made it look a lot closer! That was the mid fifties, I know it was before I got a drivers license at 1 6 in 1958. Tom Hale Lurking here, building a Sonex ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ray Krause" <raykrause(at)frontiernet.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 8:59:46 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Wing flex, the need for struts.. Thought they would roll it! Ray Krause Sent from my iPad On Feb 17, 2015, at 8:23 AM, Boatright, Jeffrey < jeffboatright(at)emory.edu > wrote: Geeze, parts of that video are so =C3=A2=82=AC=C2 dramatic (?) =C3=A2 =82=AC=C2 that it almost looks like CGI rather than a real crew flyin g a real airplane. It=C3=A2=82=AC=84=A2s pretty amazing what the curr ent generation airliners can do when lightly loaded and without passengers. From: Ray Krause < raykrause(at)frontiernet.net > Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 10:50 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Wing flex, the need for struts..
Who says we need wing struts, a little wing flex just adds to the beauty. W ith the proper engineering....
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GZRKm6PG918 Sorry, but I could not resist the beauty of this video. I guess we are stil l learning from God's little creatures, the birds. Ray Krause Sent from my iPad
This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the original message (including attachments). =C2=C2=B7=BA~=B0=C3=AD=C2=B2,=C3=9E=C3=99=C3=8A%=C2=A2=C2=BD 4=C3=93M4}=C2=A7r=B9=C2=AB=B0=C3=C3=A7{(=C2=BA=C2=B8=C5=BE =C2=AD8^>'=C2=ADzzh=9D=C2=B8=C2=AC=C2=B4I=C5=A1=C5-Qh=C2=AE=C3=A9 =9D=C2=B1=C3=ABax=C3=86=C2=AD=C2=AE=B0=C3=A2r=C3=82=C3=A2=C2=B2 =C3=91^j=C3=9B=C2=ABz=C3=83Z=C2=BE(=C2=B6=C5-=C3=AD=C2=A1=C2=BA=C3=A8=C3 =82=C3=87=C2=AD=C3=A9=C5=A1=C5=B8"=C3=A2=C2=B2=C3=9B=C2=AD=C5-X =C2=AD=B0=C3=AB,=C2=B9=C3=88Z=C2=B0=C2=B8=C2=AC=C2=B5I=C3J=C3 =C3=ACr=C2=B8=C2=A9=C2=B6*'=C2=B7!=C5-=C3=B7=99y=C2=C3=9C =9E:0=C5=BEZw=C2=B0=C3=9A=C3=88=C3=A8=C3=82=C3=87=9A=C2=ABE =C3=A1=C2=A2=C3=9A,=C2=C3=9Ejwf=C2=B9=C3=88f=C2=B9=C3=88f=C2=A2 =C2=B7=C5=A1-=C2=B7=C5=B8-=C3=9Bi=C3=C3=BC0=C3=82f=C2=AD =C2=AE=B0=C3=A2r=C3=87(=BA=C3=B3Z=C2=BE(=C2=B6=C5-=C3=8F =B0=C3=AB^=C5=BE=C5=A1%.+--=C3=9Bi=C3=C3=BC0=C3=82f=C2=AD=C2 =AE=B0=C3=A2r=C3=87(=BA=C3=B3Z=C2=BE(=C2=B6=C5-=C3=8F =B0=C3=AB^=C5=BE=C5=A1%.+-=C3=BD=C2=A3M=C2=8D $=93NECI=C2=A9=C5=BE =9A=C2=B7=C5=A1=C2=B5=C3=8A'=C2=B5=C3=A9=C3=ADj[(j=C3=B6=C2=A2=A2 =C2=C3=A5z=C3=B8=C5=A1=C2=B6=93y=C2=B1h=C2=AE=C3=A9=C2=ACj=C3=9E~m =C2=A7=C3=C3=9F=C2=A2=C2=BB=C2=C2=B2f=C2=AD=C2=AE=B0=C3=A2r=C3 =87(=C5=A1m=C2=A7=C3=C3=9F=C2=A2=C2=BB=C2=C2=B2f=C2=AD=C2=AE=B0 =C3=A2r=C3=87(=BA=C3=B6=B9=C5-=C3=8BB=C2=A2{k=B0=C2=BB =C2=AD=C5-=B0=C3'y=C2=B4=C2=A2=C2=B5=C3=A4=C3=A1jy2=C2=A2=C3=A7 =C3=A8=C2=AF*.=C2=AE=C2=A7z=C2=BA.=C2=B2=C3=8B=C2=A9=C2=C5-=C3=AD1=C2 =ABm=C2=B6=C2=A5=A2=C3=A2=C3=A2=C2=B2=C3=90=C5=A1)=C3=9A-=C2 =B7=C5=B8-=C3=9Bi=C3=C3=BC0=C3=82f=C2=AD=C2=AE=B0=C3=A2r =C3=87(=BA=C3=B7(=C5=BE=C3=9A=C3=A2n=C3=ABb=C2=A2xm=C2=B6=C5=B8=C3 =C3=83&j=C3=9A=C3=A8=C5=BE',r=B0=C2r=B0=C3=AD=C2=AE&=C3=AE =C2=B6*'=C3=BD=C2=AF=C3=9B=C3=BD=C3=BA'=C2=B7=C3=BAk{=C3=B6=C3=A8w/=C3=A1 =C2=B6i
=== ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Scott varnishing!
From: Scott Knowlton <flyingscott_k(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 17, 2015
It is so ironic you sent me that photo. It is posted in my shop under a pla stic protective liner for motivation! I forgot that was your bird!! Couple shots from my first coat on the upper fuselage. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 17, 2015, at 4:19 PM, "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-LME0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" wrote: > > You are SO right Scott! Your airframe comes to life with a coat of varn ish and the character of the wood starts to shine thru! > > When you start covering you go thru this same kind of experience. I remem ber being sad that the woodwork was getting all covered up > but at the same time I was thrilled to see airfoil and airframe shapes com ing to life too! > > (plus when you varnish it makes your house or garage smell like you just p urchased brand new hardwood furniture!!!!) > > Mike C. > Ohio > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-LME0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Subject: Scott varnishing!
Date: Feb 17, 2015
Oh wow, very cool!!!!! I'm glad that photo motivated you Scott! You know all of these photos will give you lots of fond memories as time goes by too. I just ran across a bunch of old build photos and w ow, it took me down memory lane. Man is that ever looking good! Love it! From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-lis t-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Scott Knowlton Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 4:58 PM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Scott varnishing! It is so ironic you sent me that photo. It is posted in my shop under a pl astic protective liner for motivation! I forgot that was your bird!! Couple shots from my first coat on the upper fuselage. [image.jpeg] [image.jpeg] Sent from my iPhone On Feb 17, 2015, at 4:19 PM, "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-LME0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" > wrote: You are SO right Scott! Your airframe comes to life with a coat of varni sh and the character of the wood starts to shine thru! When you start covering you go thru this same kind of experience. I rememb er being sad that the woodwork was getting all covered up but at the same time I was thrilled to see airfoil and airframe shapes comi ng to life too! (plus when you varnish it makes your house or garage smell like you just pu rchased brand new hardwood furniture!!!!) Mike C. Ohio ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Directions for Toolstock
From: "tools" <n0kkj(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Feb 17, 2015
335 castlerock Ln Chickamauga GA 30707 Just north of 9a5 Looking forward to seeing you all! Tools Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438466#438466 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 17, 2015
Subject: antenna location
From: Steven Dortch <steven.d.dortch(at)gmail.com>
What is the conventional wisdom of handheld radio antenna location. I have the antenna extension "kit" for my ICOM A21. I am also looking for a place to mount the radio itself. It is a long thing. When I get into the cockpit there are few places to mount the radio. -- Blue Skies, Steve D ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ray Krause <raykrause(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: Wing flex, the need for struts..
Date: Feb 17, 2015
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: antenna location
From: "taildrags" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 17, 2015
Well, Steve, the answer you're going to get is, "it depends". Mostly on your cockpit layout, in my opinion, as far as the radio itself. You'll also get lots of ideas on the antenna, but I haven't had good luck with the remote VHF COMM whip in the empennage behind the pilot's seat. The rubber ducky antenna that came with my Icom A23 has given me the best signal. In my cockpit, I have throttle and carb heat knobs on the left so there is no place to put the radio over there. The right side is probably the best, but my fuel shutoff valve is at the bottom corner of the instrument panel on that side so I can't get too low with the radio or it will block ready access to the fuel shutoff. I'm going to fabricate a sheet aluminum bracket going by the little plan that I got from Bill Rewey (he used to sell a bunch of different details and plans for accessories for Piets and the radio holder was one of them). It will place the radio just below the cockpit coaming on the right side of the cockpit with the rubber ducky sticking out and the digital readout and radio buttons angled where I can see them and get to them. Somebody (Jack? Gary?) has their radio installed up in the underside of the wing centersection, a really slick setup if you use a standard panel mount COM rather than a handheld. -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438469#438469 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: setting up a Push to talk intercom
From: "taildrags" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 17, 2015
Steve; I have an older (MUCH older) Sigtronics 2-place portable intercom. Not sure which model you have, but my guess is that they are all going to be quite similar. You can get wiring diagrams from the Sigtronics website. Check this one out: http://www.sigtronics.com/_pdf/air_pdf/air_intercom_pdf/perm2way.pdf Don't panic... you don't have to be a Radioman First Class to read it... you infantry grunts can just scroll down and you'll find pictures ;o) Right now, I only have a PTT on the pilot's stick, so the front-seater can only listen, not talk. However, my Sigtronics has a switch that kills the front-seater's mic. When it gets busy on the radio or you don't want distractions, you flip that switch and it's just you and ATC. The front-seater still hears the chatter, but he can't cut in or be heard. I got tired of fiddling with Velcro-attach PTT switches with their coiled cords and extra stuff, so I went ahead and bought a plain and simple Ray Allen G101 stick grip, which has a nice foam handgrip and a single momentary PTT "pickle switch" button at your thumb, and hard-wired it. None of this F-4 Phantom stick grip stuff with buttons, Chinese hats, bomb releases, arm switches, and all sorts of knobs on it. I routed the shielded PTT wire down inside the stick, out the bottom, and secured to the walking beam that connects the front and back sticks. The wire goes forward, up the aft side of the front seat, into the instrument area behind the panel, and then over to where the handheld goes. I was tired of having a bunch of loose wires everywhere in the cockpit when I wanted to use the radio. -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438470#438470 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: setting up a Push to talk intercom
From: "taildrags" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 17, 2015
Steve: my apologies. I failed to notice your requirement that the intercom not be voice activated. Mine is. The PTT is only for radio transmission. Sorry... -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438471#438471 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Gary Boothe <gboothe5(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: antenna location
Date: Feb 17, 2015
Not me, Oscar. I don't even know how to spell RADIO. I have an old Icom that I'm struggling with... Gary Sent from my iPad > On Feb 17, 2015, at 8:24 PM, taildrags wrote: > > > Well, Steve, the answer you're going to get is, "it depends". Mostly on your cockpit layout, in my opinion, as far as the radio itself. You'll also get lots of ideas on the antenna, but I haven't had good luck with the remote VHF COMM whip in the empennage behind the pilot's seat. The rubber ducky antenna that came with my Icom A23 has given me the best signal. > > In my cockpit, I have throttle and carb heat knobs on the left so there is no place to put the radio over there. The right side is probably the best, but my fuel shutoff valve is at the bottom corner of the instrument panel on that side so I can't get too low with the radio or it will block ready access to the fuel shutoff. I'm going to fabricate a sheet aluminum bracket going by the little plan that I got from Bill Rewey (he used to sell a bunch of different details and plans for accessories for Piets and the radio holder was one of them). It will place the radio just below the cockpit coaming on the right side of the cockpit with the rubber ducky sticking out and the digital readout and radio buttons angled where I can see them and get to them. Somebody (Jack? Gary?) has their radio installed up in the underside of the wing centersection, a really slick setup if you use a standard panel mount COM rather than a handheld. > > -------- > Oscar Zuniga > Medford, OR > Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" > A75 power > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438469#438469 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 18, 2015
Subject: Multiple structures in the wind.
From: Steven Dortch <steven.d.dortch(at)gmail.com>
Gentlemen, I have access to a buddy who is an aerodynamacist and pilot and plane owner. He works at a well known boating school in Maryland. I asked him about placing antennas and told him that AFTER I had my plane up and flying I was looking for some aerodynamic cleanup and he todl me the following. First, the antenna must be placed first for reception and transmission and then for aerodynamics. Near metal cabanes or struts makes the radio very directional. He had to look up what a Pietenpol Aircamper looks like. His "Comments: Solid wheel instead of the wire spokes are much better. On bungee covers, don't use canvas, use plastic/fiberglass fairings. A flag (canvas) in the wind has lots of drag. A canvas front cockpit cover will help but think about making one out of lightweight fiberglass and make it fit well. Yes, to put fairings on the round tubes. Actually draw a real airfoil, e.g., an NACA 0012 or 009 if it will fit. You can find the coordinates in NACA Technical Report 824 or in a book by Abbot and von Doenhoff or I can scan and send them to you. Fiberglass or foam with a thin fiberglass cover would work. If you are good at sheet metal work, then thin aluminum will also work. Look in the marine field for fairings. I have seen fairings on sailboat shrouds, etc. A friend at the airport has a Piet. I'll have to go look at his and see what he has done." Any Any other ides from the peanut gallery. we should be careful, we don't want to exceed VNE in cruse. -- Blue Skies, Steve D ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Douwe Blumberg" <douweblumberg(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: VNE at cruise
Date: Feb 19, 2015
About the only way I can imagine my Piet exceeding VNE at cruise is with a JATO pack strapped between the wheels! In all seriousness, I think aerodynamic mods are fine if they don't add weight and you find it an enjoyable pursuit. After all, fun is why we build these things. However, don't expect too much from them and I've often wondered if the extra effort and time added building, is worth an extra 3 kts cruising speed. I mean, when I'm chugging around for my average 30 minute summer flight, I couldn't care less how fast I'm going. The ONLY time I ever wish I had a few extra kts of speed is going to Brodhead, but even then it would only shave off ten-fifteen minutes or so. That being said.. I did spend an extra month fairing the axle and covering the wire wheels. I have NO idea how much it helped having not flown without those mods. The biggest thing I could do to improve my cruise speed would be to fair or reshape my wood struts which have a poor aerodynamic shape, but again, I've weighed the effort against the benefit and decided I'd rather spend the time flying her. I also experimented with some teardrop shaped clear plastic tubing to fair the round cables. I did my landing gear cables, then decided against doing the flying wires because it would destroy the vintage look. But I do think round wires make a ton of drag which could be at least halved by sleeving them. I think biggest drag inducers that could actually be helped are: struts, wheels, strut connections, axle, windscreens, foot pegs, cables. $.02 Douwe ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Boatright, Jeffrey" <jeffboatright(at)emory.edu>
Subject: Re: VNE at cruise
Date: Feb 19, 2015
U3dpdGNoaW5nIGZyb20gY2FudmFzLWNvdmVyZWQgYnVuZ2VlcyB0byBzcHJpbmdzIGRlZmluaXRl bHkgY2hhbmdlZCBob3cgbXkgUGlldCBiZWhhdmVzIHdoZW4gSSB0aHJvdHRsZSBiYWNrIGZvciBk ZXNjZW50IGluIHRoZSBwYXR0ZXJuLiBXaXRoIHRoZSBidW5nZWVzLCB0aGUgbm9zZSByZWFsbHkg ZHJvcHBlZCB3aGVuIEkgcHVsbGVkIHRoZSB0aHJvdHRsZSB0byBpZGxlLiBUaGlzIGVmZmVjdCBp cyBtdWNoIGxlc3MgcHJvbm91bmNlZCBhZnRlciB3ZSBzd2l0Y2hlZCB0byBzcHJpbmdzLg0KDQot LQ0KSmVmZnJleSBILiBCb2F0cmlnaHQsIFBoRCwgRkFSVk8NClByb2Zlc3NvciBvZiBPcGh0aGFs bW9sb2d5DQpFbW9yeSBVbml2ZXJzaXR5IFNjaG9vbCBvZiBNZWRpY2luZQ0KDQpGcm9tOiBEb3V3 ZSBCbHVtYmVyZyA8ZG91d2VibHVtYmVyZ0BlYXJ0aGxpbmsubmV0PG1haWx0bzpkb3V3ZWJsdW1i ZXJnQGVhcnRobGluay5uZXQ+Pg0KUmVwbHktVG86ICJwaWV0ZW5wb2wtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3Mu Y29tPG1haWx0bzpwaWV0ZW5wb2wtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tPiIgPHBpZXRlbnBvbC1saXN0 QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb208bWFpbHRvOnBpZXRlbnBvbC1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20+Pg0KRGF0 ZTogVGh1cnNkYXksIEZlYnJ1YXJ5IDE5LCAyMDE1IGF0IDk6MTkgQU0NClRvOiAicGlldGVucG9s LWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbTxtYWlsdG86cGlldGVucG9sLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbT4i IDxwaWV0ZW5wb2wtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tPG1haWx0bzpwaWV0ZW5wb2wtbGlzdEBtYXRy b25pY3MuY29tPj4NClN1YmplY3Q6IFBpZXRlbnBvbC1MaXN0OiBWTkUgYXQgY3J1aXNlDQoNCkFi b3V0IHRoZSBvbmx5IHdheSBJIGNhbiBpbWFnaW5lIG15IFBpZXQgZXhjZWVkaW5nIFZORSBhdCBj cnVpc2UgaXMgd2l0aCBhIEpBVE8gcGFjayBzdHJhcHBlZCBiZXR3ZWVuIHRoZSB3aGVlbHMhDQoN CkluIGFsbCBzZXJpb3VzbmVzcywgSSB0aGluayBhZXJvZHluYW1pYyBtb2RzIGFyZSBmaW5lIGlm IHRoZXkgZG9u4oCZdCBhZGQgd2VpZ2h0IGFuZCB5b3UgZmluZCBpdCBhbiBlbmpveWFibGUgcHVy c3VpdC4gIEFmdGVyIGFsbCwgZnVuIGlzIHdoeSB3ZSBidWlsZCB0aGVzZSB0aGluZ3MuICBIb3dl dmVyLCBkb27igJl0IGV4cGVjdCB0b28gbXVjaCBmcm9tIHRoZW0gYW5kIEnigJl2ZSBvZnRlbiB3 b25kZXJlZCBpZiB0aGUgZXh0cmEgZWZmb3J0IGFuZCB0aW1lIGFkZGVkIGJ1aWxkaW5nLCBpcyB3 b3J0aCBhbiBleHRyYSAzIGt0cyBjcnVpc2luZyBzcGVlZC4gIEkgbWVhbiwgd2hlbiBJ4oCZbSBj aHVnZ2luZyBhcm91bmQgZm9yIG15IGF2ZXJhZ2UgMzAgbWludXRlIHN1bW1lciBmbGlnaHQsIEkg Y291bGRu4oCZdCBjYXJlIGxlc3MgaG93IGZhc3QgSeKAmW0gZ29pbmcuICBUaGUgT05MWSB0aW1l IEkgZXZlciB3aXNoIEkgaGFkIGEgZmV3IGV4dHJhIGt0cyBvZiBzcGVlZCBpcyBnb2luZyB0byBC cm9kaGVhZCwgYnV0IGV2ZW4gdGhlbiBpdCB3b3VsZCBvbmx5IHNoYXZlIG9mZiB0ZW4tZmlmdGVl biAgbWludXRlcyBvciBzby4NCg0KVGhhdCBiZWluZyBzYWlk4oCmLg0KDQpJIGRpZCBzcGVuZCBh biBleHRyYSBtb250aCBmYWlyaW5nIHRoZSBheGxlIGFuZCBjb3ZlcmluZyB0aGUgd2lyZSB3aGVl bHMuICBJIGhhdmUgTk8gaWRlYSBob3cgbXVjaCBpdCBoZWxwZWQgaGF2aW5nIG5vdCBmbG93biB3 aXRob3V0IHRob3NlIG1vZHMuICBUaGUgYmlnZ2VzdCB0aGluZyBJIGNvdWxkIGRvIHRvIGltcHJv dmUgbXkgY3J1aXNlIHNwZWVkIHdvdWxkIGJlIHRvIGZhaXIgb3IgcmVzaGFwZSBteSB3b29kIHN0 cnV0cyB3aGljaCBoYXZlIGEgcG9vciBhZXJvZHluYW1pYyBzaGFwZSwgYnV0IGFnYWluLCBJ4oCZ dmUgd2VpZ2hlZCB0aGUgZWZmb3J0IGFnYWluc3QgdGhlIGJlbmVmaXQgYW5kIGRlY2lkZWQgSeKA mWQgcmF0aGVyIHNwZW5kIHRoZSB0aW1lIGZseWluZyBoZXIuICBJIGFsc28gZXhwZXJpbWVudGVk IHdpdGggc29tZSB0ZWFyZHJvcCBzaGFwZWQgY2xlYXIgcGxhc3RpYyB0dWJpbmcgdG8gZmFpciB0 aGUgcm91bmQgY2FibGVzLiAgSSBkaWQgbXkgbGFuZGluZyBnZWFyIGNhYmxlcywgdGhlbiBkZWNp ZGVkIGFnYWluc3QgZG9pbmcgdGhlIGZseWluZyB3aXJlcyBiZWNhdXNlIGl0IHdvdWxkICBkZXN0 cm95IHRoZSB2aW50YWdlIGxvb2suICBCdXQgSSBkbyB0aGluayByb3VuZCB3aXJlcyBtYWtlIGEg dG9uIG9mIGRyYWcgd2hpY2ggY291bGQgYmUgYXQgbGVhc3QgaGFsdmVkIGJ5IHNsZWV2aW5nIHRo ZW0uDQoNCkkgdGhpbmsgYmlnZ2VzdCBkcmFnIGluZHVjZXJzIHRoYXQgY291bGQgYWN0dWFsbHkg YmUgaGVscGVkIGFyZTogc3RydXRzLCB3aGVlbHMsIHN0cnV0IGNvbm5lY3Rpb25zLCBheGxlLCB3 aW5kc2NyZWVucywgZm9vdCBwZWdzLCBjYWJsZXMuDQoNCiQuMDINCg0KRG91d2UNCg0KDQoNCl8t PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09DQpfLT0gICAgICAgICAgLSBUaGUgUGlldGVucG9sLUxpc3QgRW1haWwgRm9ydW0gLQ0KXy09 IFVzZSB0aGUgTWF0cm9uaWNzIExpc3QgRmVhdHVyZXMgTmF2aWdhdG9yIHRvIGJyb3dzZQ0KXy09 IHRoZSBtYW55IExpc3QgdXRpbGl0aWVzIHN1Y2ggYXMgTGlzdCBVbi9TdWJzY3JpcHRpb24sDQpf LT0gQXJjaGl2ZSBTZWFyY2ggJiBEb3dubG9hZCwgNy1EYXkgQnJvd3NlLCBDaGF0LCBGQVEsDQpf LT0gUGhvdG9zaGFyZSwgYW5kIG11Y2ggbXVjaCBtb3JlOg0KXy09DQpfLT0gICAtLT4gaHR0cDov L3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL05hdmlnYXRvcj9QaWV0ZW5wb2wtTGlzdA0KXy09DQpfLT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ0K Xy09ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgLSBNQVRST05JQ1MgV0VCIEZPUlVNUyAtDQpfLT0gU2FtZSBncmVh dCBjb250ZW50IGFsc28gYXZhaWxhYmxlIHZpYSB0aGUgV2ViIEZvcnVtcyENCl8tPQ0KXy09ICAg LS0+IGh0dHA6Ly9mb3J1bXMubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbQ0KXy09DQpfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ0KXy09ICAgICAgICAg ICAgIC0gTGlzdCBDb250cmlidXRpb24gV2ViIFNpdGUgLQ0KXy09ICBUaGFuayB5b3UgZm9yIHlv dXIgZ2VuZXJvdXMgc3VwcG9ydCENCl8tPSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIC1N YXR0IERyYWxsZSwgTGlzdCBBZG1pbi4NCl8tPSAgIC0tPiBodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5j b20vY29udHJpYnV0aW9uDQpfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ0KDQoNCg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX18NCg0KVGhpcyBlLW1haWwgbWVzc2FnZSAoaW5jbHVkaW5nIGFueSBhdHRhY2htZW50cykg aXMgZm9yIHRoZSBzb2xlIHVzZSBvZg0KdGhlIGludGVuZGVkIHJlY2lwaWVudChzKSBhbmQgbWF5 IGNvbnRhaW4gY29uZmlkZW50aWFsIGFuZCBwcml2aWxlZ2VkDQppbmZvcm1hdGlvbi4gSWYgdGhl IHJlYWRlciBvZiB0aGlzIG1lc3NhZ2UgaXMgbm90IHRoZSBpbnRlbmRlZA0KcmVjaXBpZW50LCB5 b3UgYXJlIGhlcmVieSBub3RpZmllZCB0aGF0IGFueSBkaXNzZW1pbmF0aW9uLCBkaXN0cmlidXRp b24NCm9yIGNvcHlpbmcgb2YgdGhpcyBtZXNzYWdlIChpbmNsdWRpbmcgYW55IGF0dGFjaG1lbnRz KSBpcyBzdHJpY3RseQ0KcHJvaGliaXRlZC4NCg0KSWYgeW91IGhhdmUgcmVjZWl2ZWQgdGhpcyBt ZXNzYWdlIGluIGVycm9yLCBwbGVhc2UgY29udGFjdA0KdGhlIHNlbmRlciBieSByZXBseSBlLW1h aWwgbWVzc2FnZSBhbmQgZGVzdHJveSBhbGwgY29waWVzIG9mIHRoZQ0Kb3JpZ2luYWwgbWVzc2Fn ZSAoaW5jbHVkaW5nIGF0dGFjaG1lbnRzKS4NCg= ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Philips" <jack(at)bedfordlandings.com>
Subject: VNE at cruise
Date: Feb 19, 2015
Yet another email from Jeff Boatright with no content. Am I the only one who gets these? Jack Phillips NX899JP Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia (where it was a balmy 8=C2=B0 this morning) From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Boatright, Jeffrey Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 9:32 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: VNE at cruise ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Philips" <jack(at)bedfordlandings.com>
Subject: VNE at cruise
Date: Feb 19, 2015
Douwe, Of everything listed below, probably the biggest contributor to total drag on a Pietenpol is the array of cables hanging out in the breeze. A round cable being pushed through the air has a rather large drag coefficient. Streamlined flying wires for the inter-lift strut wires, the bracing wires on the tail, the roll wires between the cabanes and the bracing wires on the undercarriage (if using a straight axle) would help a good deal, but would also increase the cost of building a Pietenpol by about 50%. And nothing can be done about the elevator cables, rudder cables, tailwheel steering cables (if so equipped) and aileron cables that all hang out in the breeze. If you want something fast, build an RV or a Sonex. If you want low 'n' slow, build a Pietenpol. Jack Phillips NX899JP Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Douwe Blumberg Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 9:19 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: VNE at cruise About the only way I can imagine my Piet exceeding VNE at cruise is with a JATO pack strapped between the wheels! In all seriousness, I think aerodynamic mods are fine if they don't add weight and you find it an enjoyable pursuit. After all, fun is why we build these things. However, don't expect too much from them and I've often wondered if the extra effort and time added building, is worth an extra 3 kts cruising speed. I mean, when I'm chugging around for my average 30 minute summer flight, I couldn't care less how fast I'm going. The ONLY time I ever wish I had a few extra kts of speed is going to Brodhead, but even then it would only shave off ten-fifteen minutes or so. That being said.. I did spend an extra month fairing the axle and covering the wire wheels. I have NO idea how much it helped having not flown without those mods. The biggest thing I could do to improve my cruise speed would be to fair or reshape my wood struts which have a poor aerodynamic shape, but again, I've weighed the effort against the benefit and decided I'd rather spend the time flying her. I also experimented with some teardrop shaped clear plastic tubing to fair the round cables. I did my landing gear cables, then decided against doing the flying wires because it would destroy the vintage look. But I do think round wires make a ton of drag which could be at least halved by sleeving them. I think biggest drag inducers that could actually be helped are: struts, wheels, strut connections, axle, windscreens, foot pegs, cables. $.02 Douwe ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 19, 2015
Subject: Re: VNE at cruise
From: "Andre B. Charvet" <bencharvet(at)gmail.com>
Tm8sIEkgZ2V0IHRoZW0gdG9vCkJlbiBDaGFydmV0CgpKYWNrIFBoaWxpcHMgPGphY2tAYmVkZm9y ZGxhbmRpbmdzLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6Cj48IS0tIC8qIEZvbnQgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8gQGZvbnQt ZmFjZSAJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJDYW1icmlhIE1hdGgiOyAJcGFub3NlLTE6MiA0IDUgMyA1IDQg NiAzIDIgNDt9IEBmb250LWZhY2UgCXtmb250LWZhbWlseTpDYWxpYnJpOyAJcGFub3NlLTE6MiAx NSA1IDIgMiAyIDQgMyAyIDQ7fSAvKiBTdHlsZSBEZWZpbml0aW9ucyAqLyBwLk1zb05vcm1hbCwg bGkuTXNvTm9ybWFsLCBkaXYuTXNvTm9ybWFsIAl7bWFyZ2luOjBpbjsgCW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206 LjAwMDFwdDsgCWZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7IAlmb250LWZhbWlseToiQ2FsaWJyaSIsc2Fucy1z ZXJpZjt9IGE6bGluaywgc3Bhbi5Nc29IeXBlcmxpbmsgCXttc28tc3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6OTk7 IAljb2xvcjojMDU2M0MxOyAJdGV4dC1kZWNvcmF0aW9uOnVuZGVybGluZTt9IGE6dmlzaXRlZCwg c3Bhbi5Nc29IeXBlcmxpbmtGb2xsb3dlZCAJe21zby1zdHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eTo5OTsgCWNvbG9y OiM5NTRGNzI7IAl0ZXh0LWRlY29yYXRpb246dW5kZXJsaW5lO30gc3Bhbi5FbWFpbFN0eWxlMTcg CXttc28tc3R5bGUtdHlwZTpwZXJzb25hbC1yZXBseTsgCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJDYWxpYnJpIixz YW5zLXNlcmlmOyAJY29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RDt9IC5Nc29DaHBEZWZhdWx0IAl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXR5 cGU6ZXhwb3J0LW9ubHk7IAlmb250LWZhbWlseToiQ2FsaWJyaSIsc2Fucy1zZXJpZjt9IEBwYWdl IFdvcmRTZWN0aW9uMSAJe3NpemU6OC41aW4gMTEuMGluOyAJbWFyZ2luOjEuMGluIDEuMGluIDEu MGluIDEuMGluO30gZGl2LldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMSAJe3BhZ2U6V29yZFNlY3Rpb24xO30gLS0+Cj4K PllldCBhbm90aGVyIGVtYWlsIGZyb20gSmVmZiBCb2F0cmlnaHQgd2l0aCBubyBjb250ZW50LsKg IEFtIEkgdGhlIG9ubHkgb25lIHdobyBnZXRzIHRoZXNlPwo+Cj7CoAo+Cj5KYWNrIFBoaWxsaXBz Cj4KPk5YODk5SlAKPgo+U21pdGggTW91bnRhaW4gTGFrZSwgVmlyZ2luaWEKPgo+KHdoZXJlIGl0 IHdhcyBhIGJhbG15IDjCsCB0aGlzIG1vcm5pbmcpCj4KPsKgCj4KPkZyb206IG93bmVyLXBpZXRl bnBvbC1saXN0LXNlcnZlckBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tIFttYWlsdG86b3duZXItcGlldGVucG9sLWxp c3Qtc2VydmVyQG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb21dIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiBCb2F0cmlnaHQsIEplZmZyZXkK PlNlbnQ6IFRodXJzZGF5LCBGZWJydWFyeSAxOSwgMjAxNSA5OjMyIEFNCj5UbzogcGlldGVucG9s LWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbQo+U3ViamVjdDogUmU6IFBpZXRlbnBvbC1MaXN0OiBWTkUgYXQg Y3J1aXNlCj4KPsKgCj4KPsKgCj4KPl8tPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09IF8tPSAtIFRoZSBQaWV0ZW5wb2wtTGlzdCBFbWFp bCBGb3J1bSAtIF8tPSBVc2UgdGhlIE1hdHJvbmljcyBMaXN0IEZlYXR1cmVzIE5hdmlnYXRvciB0 byBicm93c2UgXy09IHRoZSBtYW55IExpc3QgdXRpbGl0aWVzIHN1Y2ggYXMgTGlzdCBVbi9TdWJz Y3JpcHRpb24sIF8tPSBBcmNoaXZlIFNlYXJjaCAmIERvd25sb2FkLCA3LURheSBCcm93c2UsIENo YXQsIEZBUSwgXy09IFBob3Rvc2hhcmUsIGFuZCBtdWNoIG11Y2ggbW9yZTogXy09IF8tPSAtLT4g aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL05hdmlnYXRvcj9QaWV0ZW5wb2wtTGlzdCBfLT0gXy09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT0gXy09IC0gTUFUUk9OSUNTIFdFQiBGT1JVTVMgLSBfLT0gU2FtZSBncmVhdCBjb250ZW50IGFs c28gYXZhaWxhYmxlIHZpYSB0aGUgV2ViIEZvcnVtcyEgXy09IF8tPSAtLT4gaHR0cDovL2ZvcnVt cy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tIF8tPSBfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PSBfLT0gLSBMaXN0IENvbnRyaWJ1dGlvbiBXZWIgU2l0 ZSAtIF8tPSBUaGFuayB5b3UgZm9yIHlvdXIgZ2VuZXJvdXMgc3VwcG9ydCEgXy09IC1NYXR0IERy YWxsZSwgTGlzdCBBZG1pbi4gXy09IC0tPiBodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vY29udHJp YnV0aW9uIF8tPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09IA= ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Barry Davis" <bed(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: VNE at cruise
Date: Feb 19, 2015
I think Jeff is using invisible ink. I=99m have been getting blank ones from him for a while now. Thought I was the only one. Barry NX973BP From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Boatright, Jeffrey Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 9:32 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: VNE at cruise ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: VNE at cruise
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Feb 19, 2015
I see Jeff's just fine. But I am on a PC right now. Wonder if that matters? -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438509#438509 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike McGowan" <shadetree(at)socket.net>
Subject: Re: VNE at cruise
Date: Feb 19, 2015
Does covering the spokes on wire wheels make any difference in directional control or stability? Mike McGowan From: Barry Davis Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 12:11 PM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: VNE at cruise I think Jeff is using invisible ink. I=99m have been getting blank on es from him for a while now. Thought I was the only one. Barry NX973BP From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-lis t-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Boatright, Jeffrey Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 9:32 AM Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: VNE at cruise --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: VNE at cruise
From: "Jeff Boatright" <jeffboatright(at)emory.edu>
Date: Feb 19, 2015
Several people apparently get blank posts from me. I think this happens sometimes when I reply directly to a matronics post by email. I am sending this message instead by going to the matronics webpage a replying via the form. My reply isn't earth-shattering. It was: Switching from canvas-covered bungees to springs definitely changed how my Piet behaves when I throttle back for descent in the pattern. With the bungees, the nose really dropped when I pulled the throttle to idle. This effect is much less pronounced after we switched to springs. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438511#438511 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Philips" <jack(at)bedfordlandings.com>
Subject: Re: VNE at cruise
Date: Feb 19, 2015
So am I. Jack Phillips NX899JP Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of AircamperN11MS Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 2:54 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: VNE at cruise --> I see Jeff's just fine. But I am on a PC right now. Wonder if that matters? -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438509#438509 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ray Krause <raykrause(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: VNE at cruise
Date: Feb 19, 2015
To those with "covered wheels", how are they covered? With fabric or aluminu m discs? If fabric, does it just go around the bead of the rim and cement it in place? What happens when you have to repair a tire, just recover. Bassl e has aluminum discs for about $300, covering would be a lot cheaper! Thanks, Ray Krause Sent from my iPad > On Feb 19, 2015, at 11:59 AM, Mike McGowan wrote: > > Does covering the spokes on wire wheels make any difference in directional control or stability? > > Mike McGowan > > From: Barry Davis > Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 12:11 PM > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: VNE at cruise > > I think Jeff is using invisible ink. I=99m have been getting blank o nes from him for a while now. Thought I was the only one. > Barry > NX973BP > > From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-li st-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Boatright, Jeffrey > Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 9:32 AM > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: VNE at cruise > > > > > ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List > ics.com > .matronics.com/contribution > > > > > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > www.avast.com > > > > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 19, 2015
Subject: Re: VNE at cruise
From: Steven Dortch <steven.d.dortch(at)gmail.com>
Per my aerodynamacist, these vintage videos are an excellent source for information on drag. The professor's lecture voice is a killer, but he talks the talk. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acySDnGYzVM&index=16&list=PL0EC6527BE 871ABA3 Blue Skies, Steve D On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Ray Krause wrote: > To those with "covered wheels", how are they covered? With fabric or > aluminum discs? If fabric, does it just go around the bead of the rim and > cement it in place? What happens when you have to repair a tire, just > recover. Bassle has aluminum discs for about $300, covering would be a l ot > cheaper! > > Thanks, > > Ray Krause > > Sent from my iPad > > On Feb 19, 2015, at 11:59 AM, Mike McGowan wrote: > > Does covering the spokes on wire wheels make any difference in > directional control or stability? > > Mike McGowan > > *From:* Barry Davis > *Sent:* Thursday, February 19, 2015 12:11 PM > *To:* pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* RE: Pietenpol-List: VNE at cruise > > > I think Jeff is using invisible ink. I=99m have been getting blank ones from > him for a while now. Thought I was the only one. > > Barry > > NX973BP > > > *From:* owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [ > mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com > ] *On Behalf Of *Boatright, > Jeffrey > *Sent:* Thursday, February 19, 2015 9:32 AM > *To:* pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* Re: Pietenpol-List: VNE at cruise > > > * > > ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List > ics.com <http://ics.com> > .matronics.com/contribution <http://matronics.com/contribution> > > * > > > ------------------------------ > <http://www.avast.com/> > > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > www.avast.com > > * > > D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D > npol-List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List > D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D > //forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com> > D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D > ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D > > * > > * > =========== .matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List> =========== =========== om/contribution> =========== > > * > > -- Blue Skies, Steve D ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-LME0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Subject: cruise speeds vs. engine choices
Date: Feb 19, 2015
Although I didn't consult with an aerodynamicist or look up any Vne speeds or drag coefficients, I have learned, thru my experience in flying Pietnepols that you're more likely to get passed up more quickly at cruise speeds by Canadian geese if flying a Ford powered Piet vs. a Contine ntal or Corvair powered Piet. Mike C. Ohio ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 19, 2015
From: Charles Burkholder <born2fly(at)abcmailbox.net>
Subject: Re: VNE at cruise- bungees versus springs landing gear
Regarding bungee or spring landing gear. I am half done my split axle landing gear but not at quite the shock absorbers. I am leaning towards using steel spring due to the low maintenance "build, fly and forget" it offers. I was talking to a very experienced tailwheel pilot and instructor (not a homebuilder) about it and he recommended bungees. Could I have any input on the pro's and con's of each? How many of you builders have made the switch after your piet was built and why? If anything it might add 1 knot to the cruise speed! On 2/19/2015 9:31 AM, Boatright, Jeffrey wrote: > Switching from canvas-covered bungees to springs definitely changed > how my Piet behaves when I throttle back for descent in the pattern. > With the bungees, the nose really dropped when I pulled the throttle > to idle. This effect is much less pronounced after we switched to springs. > > -- > Jeffrey H. Boatright, PhD, FARVO > Professor of Ophthalmology > Emory University School of Medicine > > From: Douwe Blumberg <douweblumberg(at)earthlink.net > > > Reply-To: "pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > " > > Date: Thursday, February 19, 2015 at 9:19 AM > To: "pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > " > > Subject: Pietenpol-List: VNE at cruise > > About the only way I can imagine my Piet exceeding VNE at cruise > is with a JATO pack strapped between the wheels! > > In all seriousness, I think aerodynamic mods are fine if they > dont add weight and you find it an enjoyable pursuit. After all, > fun is why we build these things. However, dont expect too much > from them and Ive often wondered if the extra effort and time > added building, is worth an extra 3 kts cruising speed. I mean, > when Im chugging around for my average 30 minute summer flight, I > couldnt care less how fast Im going. The ONLY time I ever wish > I had a few extra kts of speed is going to Brodhead, but even then > it would only shave off ten-fifteen minutes or so. > > That being said. > > I did spend an extra month fairing the axle and covering the wire > wheels. I have NO idea how much it helped having not flown > without those mods. The biggest thing I could do to improve my > cruise speed would be to fair or reshape my wood struts which have > a poor aerodynamic shape, but again, Ive weighed the effort > against the benefit and decided Id rather spend the time flying > her. I also experimented with some teardrop shaped clear plastic > tubing to fair the round cables. I did my landing gear cables, > then decided against doing the flying wires because it would > destroy the vintage look. But I do think round wires make a ton > of drag which could be at least halved by sleeving them. > > I think biggest drag inducers that could actually be helped are: > struts, wheels, strut connections, axle, windscreens, foot pegs, > cables. > > $.02 > > Douwe > > * > > > * > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of > the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged > information. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution > or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly > prohibited. > > If you have received this message in error, please contact > the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the > original message (including attachments). > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> > > ky"Z+M4Gq(wrzKDKj',.+- > 5h,z^.+- Tn+bp+ry'C { ,x(ZP> -Zvkkj+ykym-&j',r5hRm-&j',r5hR08IaT1$+y\{^j)ZnWayg+k&j',r+k&j',rh*'gJ+^N*.~zw,h jY^.+-kym-&j',rr&*'i0fr((nb{nrf -- Charles Burkholder Visit my blog @ http://missionmechfund.blogspot.ca/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Boatright, Jeffrey" <jeffboatright(at)emory.edu>
Subject: Re: VNE at cruise- bungees versus springs landing gear
Date: Feb 20, 2015
SGFkIGJ1bmdlZXMuIEJ1bmdlZXMgZGlkbid0IHBhc3MgaW5zcGVjdGlvbiBvbmUgeWVhci4gQ29u dmVydGVkIHRvIHNwcmluZ3MgKHRoZXkgd2VyZSBmcmVlIHRvIG1lKS4gTm8gbWFpbnRlbmFuY2Uu IE5vIGRpZmZlcmVuY2UgaW4gbGFuZGluZyBwZXJmb3JtYW5jZSB0aGF0IEkgY2FuIHRlbGwuDQoN CuKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlOKA lOKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlOKAlA0KSmVmZnJleSBILiBCb2F0cmlnaHQsIFBo RCwgRkFSVk8NClByb2Zlc3NvciBvZiBPcGh0aGFsbW9sb2d5DQpFbW9yeSBVbml2ZXJzaXR5IFNj aG9vbCBvZiBNZWRpY2luZQ0KU2VudCBmcm9tIGFuIGlQYWQgd2l0aCBhIHNwZWxsaW5nIHByb2Js ZW0NCg0KT24gRmViIDE5LCAyMDE1LCBhdCA4OjU5IFBNLCAiQ2hhcmxlcyBCdXJraG9sZGVyIiA8 Ym9ybjJmbHlAYWJjbWFpbGJveC5uZXQ8bWFpbHRvOmJvcm4yZmx5QGFiY21haWxib3gubmV0Pj4g d3JvdGU6DQoNClJlZ2FyZGluZyBidW5nZWUgb3Igc3ByaW5nIGxhbmRpbmcgZ2Vhci4gSSBhbSBo YWxmIGRvbmUgbXkgc3BsaXQgYXhsZSBsYW5kaW5nIGdlYXIgYnV0IG5vdCBhdCBxdWl0ZSB0aGUg c2hvY2sgYWJzb3JiZXJzLiBJIGFtIGxlYW5pbmcgdG93YXJkcyB1c2luZyBzdGVlbCBzcHJpbmcg ZHVlIHRvIHRoZSBsb3cgbWFpbnRlbmFuY2UgImJ1aWxkLCBmbHkgYW5kIGZvcmdldCIgaXQgb2Zm ZXJzLiBJIHdhcyB0YWxraW5nIHRvIGEgdmVyeSBleHBlcmllbmNlZCB0YWlsd2hlZWwgcGlsb3Qg YW5kIGluc3RydWN0b3IgKG5vdCBhIGhvbWVidWlsZGVyKSBhYm91dCBpdCBhbmQgaGUgcmVjb21t ZW5kZWQgYnVuZ2Vlcy4NCkNvdWxkIEkgaGF2ZSBhbnkgaW5wdXQgb24gdGhlIHBybydzIGFuZCBj b24ncyBvZiBlYWNoPyBIb3cgbWFueSBvZiB5b3UgYnVpbGRlcnMgaGF2ZSBtYWRlIHRoZSBzd2l0 Y2ggYWZ0ZXIgeW91ciBwaWV0IHdhcyBidWlsdCBhbmQgd2h5PyBJZiBhbnl0aGluZyBpdCBtaWdo dCBhZGQgMSBrbm90IHRvIHRoZSBjcnVpc2Ugc3BlZWQhDQpPbiAyLzE5LzIwMTUgOTozMSBBTSwg Qm9hdHJpZ2h0LCBKZWZmcmV5IHdyb3RlOg0KU3dpdGNoaW5nIGZyb20gY2FudmFzLWNvdmVyZWQg YnVuZ2VlcyB0byBzcHJpbmdzIGRlZmluaXRlbHkgY2hhbmdlZCBob3cgbXkgUGlldCBiZWhhdmVz IHdoZW4gSSB0aHJvdHRsZSBiYWNrIGZvciBkZXNjZW50IGluIHRoZSBwYXR0ZXJuLiBXaXRoIHRo ZSBidW5nZWVzLCB0aGUgbm9zZSByZWFsbHkgZHJvcHBlZCB3aGVuIEkgcHVsbGVkIHRoZSB0aHJv dHRsZSB0byBpZGxlLiBUaGlzIGVmZmVjdCBpcyBtdWNoIGxlc3MgcHJvbm91bmNlZCBhZnRlciB3 ZSBzd2l0Y2hlZCB0byBzcHJpbmdzLg0KDQotLQ0KSmVmZnJleSBILiBCb2F0cmlnaHQsIFBoRCwg RkFSVk8NClByb2Zlc3NvciBvZiBPcGh0aGFsbW9sb2d5DQpFbW9yeSBVbml2ZXJzaXR5IFNjaG9v bCBvZiBNZWRpY2luZQ0KDQpGcm9tOiBEb3V3ZSBCbHVtYmVyZyA8ZG91d2VibHVtYmVyZ0BlYXJ0 aGxpbmsubmV0PG1haWx0bzpkb3V3ZWJsdW1iZXJnQGVhcnRobGluay5uZXQ+Pg0KUmVwbHktVG86 ICJwaWV0ZW5wb2wtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tPG1haWx0bzpwaWV0ZW5wb2wtbGlzdEBtYXRy b25pY3MuY29tPiIgPHBpZXRlbnBvbC1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb208bWFpbHRvOnBpZXRlbnBv bC1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20+Pg0KRGF0ZTogVGh1cnNkYXksIEZlYnJ1YXJ5IDE5LCAyMDE1 IGF0IDk6MTkgQU0NClRvOiAicGlldGVucG9sLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbTxtYWlsdG86cGll dGVucG9sLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbT4iIDxwaWV0ZW5wb2wtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29t PG1haWx0bzpwaWV0ZW5wb2wtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tPj4NClN1YmplY3Q6IFBpZXRlbnBv bC1MaXN0OiBWTkUgYXQgY3J1aXNlDQoNCkFib3V0IHRoZSBvbmx5IHdheSBJIGNhbiBpbWFnaW5l IG15IFBpZXQgZXhjZWVkaW5nIFZORSBhdCBjcnVpc2UgaXMgd2l0aCBhIEpBVE8gcGFjayBzdHJh cHBlZCBiZXR3ZWVuIHRoZSB3aGVlbHMhDQoNCkluIGFsbCBzZXJpb3VzbmVzcywgSSB0aGluayBh ZXJvZHluYW1pYyBtb2RzIGFyZSBmaW5lIGlmIHRoZXkgZG9u4oCZdCBhZGQgd2VpZ2h0IGFuZCB5 b3UgZmluZCBpdCBhbiBlbmpveWFibGUgcHVyc3VpdC4gIEFmdGVyIGFsbCwgZnVuIGlzIHdoeSB3 ZSBidWlsZCB0aGVzZSB0aGluZ3MuICBIb3dldmVyLCBkb27igJl0IGV4cGVjdCB0b28gbXVjaCBm cm9tIHRoZW0gYW5kIEnigJl2ZSBvZnRlbiB3b25kZXJlZCBpZiB0aGUgZXh0cmEgZWZmb3J0IGFu ZCB0aW1lIGFkZGVkIGJ1aWxkaW5nLCBpcyB3b3J0aCBhbiBleHRyYSAzIGt0cyBjcnVpc2luZyBz cGVlZC4gIEkgbWVhbiwgd2hlbiBJ4oCZbSBjaHVnZ2luZyBhcm91bmQgZm9yIG15IGF2ZXJhZ2Ug MzAgbWludXRlIHN1bW1lciBmbGlnaHQsIEkgY291bGRu4oCZdCBjYXJlIGxlc3MgaG93IGZhc3Qg SeKAmW0gZ29pbmcuICBUaGUgT05MWSB0aW1lIEkgZXZlciB3aXNoIEkgaGFkIGEgZmV3IGV4dHJh IGt0cyBvZiBzcGVlZCBpcyBnb2luZyB0byBCcm9kaGVhZCwgYnV0IGV2ZW4gdGhlbiBpdCB3b3Vs ZCBvbmx5IHNoYXZlIG9mZiB0ZW4tZmlmdGVlbiAgbWludXRlcyBvciBzby4NCg0KVGhhdCBiZWlu ZyBzYWlk4oCmLg0KDQpJIGRpZCBzcGVuZCBhbiBleHRyYSBtb250aCBmYWlyaW5nIHRoZSBheGxl IGFuZCBjb3ZlcmluZyB0aGUgd2lyZSB3aGVlbHMuICBJIGhhdmUgTk8gaWRlYSBob3cgbXVjaCBp dCBoZWxwZWQgaGF2aW5nIG5vdCBmbG93biB3aXRob3V0IHRob3NlIG1vZHMuICBUaGUgYmlnZ2Vz dCB0aGluZyBJIGNvdWxkIGRvIHRvIGltcHJvdmUgbXkgY3J1aXNlIHNwZWVkIHdvdWxkIGJlIHRv IGZhaXIgb3IgcmVzaGFwZSBteSB3b29kIHN0cnV0cyB3aGljaCBoYXZlIGEgcG9vciBhZXJvZHlu YW1pYyBzaGFwZSwgYnV0IGFnYWluLCBJ4oCZdmUgd2VpZ2hlZCB0aGUgZWZmb3J0IGFnYWluc3Qg dGhlIGJlbmVmaXQgYW5kIGRlY2lkZWQgSeKAmWQgcmF0aGVyIHNwZW5kIHRoZSB0aW1lIGZseWlu ZyBoZXIuICBJIGFsc28gZXhwZXJpbWVudGVkIHdpdGggc29tZSB0ZWFyZHJvcCBzaGFwZWQgY2xl YXIgcGxhc3RpYyB0dWJpbmcgdG8gZmFpciB0aGUgcm91bmQgY2FibGVzLiAgSSBkaWQgbXkgbGFu ZGluZyBnZWFyIGNhYmxlcywgdGhlbiBkZWNpZGVkIGFnYWluc3QgZG9pbmcgdGhlIGZseWluZyB3 aXJlcyBiZWNhdXNlIGl0IHdvdWxkICBkZXN0cm95IHRoZSB2aW50YWdlIGxvb2suICBCdXQgSSBk byB0aGluayByb3VuZCB3aXJlcyBtYWtlIGEgdG9uIG9mIGRyYWcgd2hpY2ggY291bGQgYmUgYXQg bGVhc3QgaGFsdmVkIGJ5IHNsZWV2aW5nIHRoZW0uDQoNCkkgdGhpbmsgYmlnZ2VzdCBkcmFnIGlu ZHVjZXJzIHRoYXQgY291bGQgYWN0dWFsbHkgYmUgaGVscGVkIGFyZTogc3RydXRzLCB3aGVlbHMs IHN0cnV0IGNvbm5lY3Rpb25zLCBheGxlLCB3aW5kc2NyZWVucywgZm9vdCBwZWdzLCBjYWJsZXMu DQoNCiQuMDINCg0KRG91d2UNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fDQoNClRoaXMgZS1tYWlsIG1lc3NhZ2UgKGluY2x1ZGluZyBhbnkgYXR0YWNobWVudHMp IGlzIGZvciB0aGUgc29sZSB1c2Ugb2YNCnRoZSBpbnRlbmRlZCByZWNpcGllbnQocykgYW5kIG1h eSBjb250YWluIGNvbmZpZGVudGlhbCBhbmQgcHJpdmlsZWdlZA0KaW5mb3JtYXRpb24uIElmIHRo ZSByZWFkZXIgb2YgdGhpcyBtZXNzYWdlIGlzIG5vdCB0aGUgaW50ZW5kZWQNCnJlY2lwaWVudCwg eW91IGFyZSBoZXJlYnkgbm90aWZpZWQgdGhhdCBhbnkgZGlzc2VtaW5hdGlvbiwgZGlzdHJpYnV0 aW9uDQpvciBjb3B5aW5nIG9mIHRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSAoaW5jbHVkaW5nIGFueSBhdHRhY2htZW50 cykgaXMgc3RyaWN0bHkNCnByb2hpYml0ZWQuDQoNCklmIHlvdSBoYXZlIHJlY2VpdmVkIHRoaXMg bWVzc2FnZSBpbiBlcnJvciwgcGxlYXNlIGNvbnRhY3QNCnRoZSBzZW5kZXIgYnkgcmVwbHkgZS1t YWlsIG1lc3NhZ2UgYW5kIGRlc3Ryb3kgYWxsIGNvcGllcyBvZiB0aGUNCm9yaWdpbmFsIG1lc3Nh Z2UgKGluY2x1ZGluZyBhdHRhY2htZW50cykuDQoNCk5vIHZpcnVzIGZvdW5kIGluIHRoaXMgbWVz c2FnZS4NCkNoZWNrZWQgYnkgQVZHIC0gd3d3LmF2Zy5jb208aHR0cDovL3d3dy5hdmcuY29tPg0K MDIvMTkvMTUNCg0Ka3nvv73vv73vv70i77+97ZyiWivvv71NNO+/vUfvv71x77+9KO+/ve+/ve+/ ve+/vXfvv71y77+977+977+977+904Xvv73vv71616fvv73vv71L77+977+9RO+/ve+/ve+/vRbv v73vv71LHu+/vRfvv71q77+977+9JywuKy0V5q26IO+/ve+/vTXvv73igato77+977+9G++/ve+/ vSx677+9Xu+/ve+/ve+/vS4rLe+/vdil77+92J7vv73LnO+/ve+/vSDvv73vv71U77+977+977+9 bu+/vSvvv73vv71i77+9cCtyGO+/vXkn77+977+977+9Q++/vSDload7IO+/ve+/ve+/ve+/vSx4 KFrvv71QED4gLe+/ve+/vVrvv73vv712a++/ve+/vWvvv73vv71qK3nvv71ree+/vW3vv73vv73v v73vv70gJmrvv73vv70nLHLvv73vv70177+94oGraO+/ve+/ve+/ve+/ve+/ve+/vVLvv73vv71t 77+977+977+977+9ICZq77+977+9Jyxy77+977+9Ne+/veKBq2jvv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv71S 77+977+977+9MATvv70477+9AklhARTvv71UMSTvv73vv73vv70ree+/vVzvv717Xu+/vdal77+9 77+977+9ailablfvv73vv73vv71heWfvv70W77+977+9xqHvv73vv73vv73vv71/77+977+9K++/ vWsmau+/ve+/vScscu+/ve+/ve+/ve+/vX/vv73vv70r77+9ayZq77+977+9Jyxy77+977+9aO+/ ve+/ve+/vSon77+977+977+977+92Kjvv71n77+9SiteThbvv73vv70qLn7vv73vv73vv73vv716 d++/ve+/ve+/vSzvv73vv71o77+977+9IO+/ve+/ve+/vWpZXi4rLQHZou+/ve+/vWt577+9be+/ ve+/ve+/ve+/vSAmau+/ve+/vScscu+/ve+/vXLvv73vv73vv70m77+9Kifvv73vv71p77+977+9 MO+/vWbvv73vv73vv73vv71y77+9KO+/ve+/vSjvv73vv73vv71u77+9Yu+/vX/vv73vv73vv73f ont/77+977+977+9bu+/vXLvv70bZg0KDQoNCi0tDQpDaGFybGVzIEJ1cmtob2xkZXINClZpc2l0 IG15IGJsb2cgQCBodHRwOi8vbWlzc2lvbm1lY2hmdW5kLmJsb2dzcG90LmNhLw0KDQoNCg0KDQpf LT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PQ0KXy09ICAgICAgICAgIC0gVGhlIFBpZXRlbnBvbC1MaXN0IEVtYWlsIEZvcnVtIC0NCl8t PSBVc2UgdGhlIE1hdHJvbmljcyBMaXN0IEZlYXR1cmVzIE5hdmlnYXRvciB0byBicm93c2UNCl8t PSB0aGUgbWFueSBMaXN0IHV0aWxpdGllcyBzdWNoIGFzIExpc3QgVW4vU3Vic2NyaXB0aW9uLA0K Xy09IEFyY2hpdmUgU2VhcmNoICYgRG93bmxvYWQsIDctRGF5IEJyb3dzZSwgQ2hhdCwgRkFRLA0K Xy09IFBob3Rvc2hhcmUsIGFuZCBtdWNoIG11Y2ggbW9yZToNCl8tPQ0KXy09ICAgLS0+IGh0dHA6 Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9OYXZpZ2F0b3I/UGlldGVucG9sLUxpc3QNCl8tPQ0KXy09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0N Cl8tPSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIC0gTUFUUk9OSUNTIFdFQiBGT1JVTVMgLQ0KXy09IFNhbWUgZ3Jl YXQgY29udGVudCBhbHNvIGF2YWlsYWJsZSB2aWEgdGhlIFdlYiBGb3J1bXMhDQpfLT0NCl8tPSAg IC0tPiBodHRwOi8vZm9ydW1zLm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20NCl8tPQ0KXy09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0NCl8tPSAgICAgICAg ICAgICAtIExpc3QgQ29udHJpYnV0aW9uIFdlYiBTaXRlIC0NCl8tPSAgVGhhbmsgeW91IGZvciB5 b3VyIGdlbmVyb3VzIHN1cHBvcnQhDQpfLT0gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAt TWF0dCBEcmFsbGUsIExpc3QgQWRtaW4uDQpfLT0gICAtLT4gaHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3Mu Y29tL2NvbnRyaWJ1dGlvbg0KXy09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0NCg0KDQo ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: VNE at cruise- bungees versus springs landing gear
From: glenschweizer(at)yahoo.com
Date: Feb 19, 2015
Hi Jeffrey Do you have any particulars on the springs you used? Source would be hel pful too. Thanks, Glen Aerial in progress (Fuse becomes a box this week end!) Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 19, 2015, at 7:12 PM, "Boatright, Jeffrey" wrote: > > Had bungees. Bungees didn't pass inspection one year. Converted to springs (they were free to me). No maintenance. No difference in landing performanc e that I can tell. > > =C3=A2=82=AC=9D=C3=A2=82=AC=9D=C3=A2=82=AC=9D=C3 =A2=82=AC=9D=C3=A2=82=AC=9D=C3=A2=82=AC=9D=C3=A2 =82=AC=9D=C3=A2=82=AC=9D=C3=A2=82=AC=9D=C3=A2=82=AC =9D=C3=A2=82=AC=9D=C3=A2=82=AC=9D=C3=A2=82=AC =9D=C3=A2=82=AC=9D=C3=A2=82=AC=9D=C3=A2=82=AC=9D=C3 =A2=82=AC=9D=C3=A2=82=AC=9D=C3=A2=82=AC=9D=C3=A2 =82=AC=9D=C3=A2=82=AC=9D=C3=A2=82=AC=9D=C3=A2=82=AC =9D=C3=A2=82=AC=9D=C3=A2=82=AC=9D=C3=A2=82=AC =9D=C3=A2=82=AC=9D=C3=A2=82=AC=9D=C3=A2=82=AC=9D > Jeffrey H. Boatright, PhD, FARVO > Professor of Ophthalmology > Emory University School of Medicine > Sent from an iPad with a spelling problem > > On Feb 19, 2015, at 8:59 PM, "Charles Burkholder" wrote: > >> Regarding bungee or spring landing gear. I am half done my split axle lan ding gear but not at quite the shock absorbers. I am leaning towards using s teel spring due to the low maintenance "build, fly and forget" it offers. I w as talking to a very experienced tailwheel pilot and instructor (not a homeb uilder) about it and he recommended bungees. >> Could I have any input on the pro's and con's of each? How many of you bu ilders have made the switch after your piet was built and why? If anything i t might add 1 knot to the cruise speed! >>> On 2/19/2015 9:31 AM, Boatright, Jeffrey wrote: >>> Switching from canvas-covered bungees to springs definitely changed how m y Piet behaves when I throttle back for descent in the pattern. With the bun gees, the nose really dropped when I pulled the throttle to idle. This effec t is much less pronounced after we switched to springs. >>> >>> -- >>> Jeffrey H. Boatright, PhD, FARVO >>> Professor of Ophthalmology >>> Emory University School of Medicine >>> >>> From: Douwe Blumberg <douweblumberg(at)earthlink.net> >>> Reply-To: "pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com" >>> Date: Thursday, February 19, 2015 at 9:19 AM >>> To: "pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com" >>> Subject: Pietenpol-List: VNE at cruise >>> >>> About the only way I can imagine my Piet exceeding VNE at cruise is with a JATO pack strapped between the wheels! >>> >>> In all seriousness, I think aerodynamic mods are fine if they don=C3=A2 =82=AC=84=A2t add weight and you find it an enjoyable pursuit. After all , fun is why we build these things. However, don=C3=A2=82=AC=84=A2t e xpect too much from them and I=C3=A2=82=AC=84=A2ve often wondered if t he extra effort and time added building, is worth an extra 3 kts cruising sp eed. I mean, when I=C3=A2=82=AC=84=A2m chugging around for my average 30 minute summer flight, I couldn=C3=A2=82=AC=84=A2t care less how fa st I=C3=A2=82=AC=84=A2m going. The ONLY time I ever wish I had a few e xtra kts of speed is going to Brodhead, but even then it would only shave of f ten-fifteen minutes or so. >>> >>> That being said=C3=A2=82=AC=C2. >>> >>> I did spend an extra month fairing the axle and covering the wire wheels . I have NO idea how much it helped having not flown without those mods. T he biggest thing I could do to improve my cruise speed would be to fair or r eshape my wood struts which have a poor aerodynamic shape, but again, I=C3=A2 =82=AC=84=A2ve weighed the effort against the benefit and decided I=C3 =A2=82=AC=84=A2d rather spend the time flying her. I also experimente d with some teardrop shaped clear plastic tubing to fair the round cables. I did my landing gear cables, then decided against doing the flying wires bec ause it would destroy the vintage look. But I do think round wires make a t on of drag which could be at least halved by sleeving them. >>> >>> I think biggest drag inducers that could actually be helped are: struts, wheels, strut connections, axle, windscreens, foot pegs, cables. >>> >>> $.02 >>> >>> Douwe >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of >>> the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged >>> information. If the reader of this message is not the intended >>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution >>> or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly >>> prohibited. >>> >>> If you have received this message in error, please contact >>> the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the >>> original message (including attachments). >>> No virus found in this message. >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>> 02/19/15 >>> >>> ky=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD"=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BD=C3=AD=C5=93=C2=A2Z+=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDM4=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDG=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BDq=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD(=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD =C3=AF=C2=C2=BDw=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDr=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=93=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BDz=C3=97=C2=A7=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDK=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BDD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=16=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDK=1E=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=17=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD j=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD',.+-=15=C3=C2=AD=C2=BA =C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD5=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=A2=C2=81=C2=ABh=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=1B=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD,z=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BD^=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD.+-=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BD=C3=98=C2=A5=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=98=C5=BE=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=8B=C5=93=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD =C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDT=C3=AF =C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDn=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD+=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDb=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDp+r=18=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDy'=C3=AF =C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDC=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD =C3=A5=C2 =A1=C2=A7{ =C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD,x(Z=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDP=10> -=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDZ=C3=AF =C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDvk=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDk=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDj+y=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDky=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDm=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD &j=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD',r=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD5=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=A2=C2=81=C2=ABh=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDR=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD =C3=AF=C2=C2=BDm=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BD &j=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD',r=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BD5=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=A2=C2=81=C2=ABh=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF =C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BDR=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD0=04=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD8=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=02Ia=01=14=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDT1$=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD+y=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD\=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD{^=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BD=C3'=C2=A5=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BDj)ZnW=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDayg=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=16=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=86=C2=A1=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=7F=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF =C2=C2=BD+=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDk&j=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD',r=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=7F=C3=AF =C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD+=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDk&j=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF =C2=C2=BD',r=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDh=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF =C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD*'=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=98=C2=A8=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDg=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD J+^N=16=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD*.~=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDzw=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD,=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDh=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD =C3=AF=C2=C2=BD =C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDjY^ .+-=01=C3=99=C2=A2=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDky=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDm=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD &j=C3=AF =C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD',r=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDr=C3=AF =C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD&=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD*'=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDi=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD0=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BDf=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BDr=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD(=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD(=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD =C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDn=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDb=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=7F =C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=9F=C2=A2{=7F=C3=AF =C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDn=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDr=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=1Bf >> >> -- >> Charles Burkholder >> Visit my blog @ http://missionmechfund.blogspot.ca/ >> >> ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= >> > )=C2=AD=C3=C3=9F=C2=A2{l=B97=C2=B6r=B0h=C2=AFM4=C3=93M=1Fi=C3 =87=C5=93=C2=A2=C3=C3=A2z=C2=B9=C3=9E=C3=81=C3=8A.=C2=AE'=C2=ABN=17=C2=8F =B0=C3=AB^=C5=BE=C5=A1%.+-=12f=C2=A2=9DZ+=C2=BAe,z=C3=98^1=C2=AB k=C2=A2x=C5=93=C2=B0=C2=B8=C2=AC=C2=B4W=C5=A1=C2=B6=C3=C3=9E=C2=B0=C3'=C2 =AF=C5-=06=C2=AD=C2=A2=C2=BBhn=C2=BA0=C2=B1=C3=ABazf=C2=A7=C3=88=C2=B8=C2=AC =C2=B6=C3=ABb=93+bz=C3=8B.r=16=C2=AC.+-R=7F=C3=92=C2=B9=C2=BB=1C=C2=AE *m=C5-=B0=C3=C2=AD=C3=88b=C2=BD=C3=A4=C5=BEj=C2=B7!=0E=C5=92' =93-=C2=9D=C3=AC6=C2=B2=06=C2=BA0=C2=B1=C3-=C2=A1j=C3=91@@=C3=B8h=C2 =B6=B9!j=C2=B7=C5=A1=C2=9D=C3=99=C2=AEr=19=C2=AEr=19=C2=A8=C2=AD=C3 =C2=A1=C2=AD=C3=A7=C3=A1=C2=B6=C3=9A=7F=C3=0C0=84=A2=C2=ABk=C2=A2x=C5=93 =C2=B1=C3=8A&=C3=BC=C3'=C2=AF=C5-=06=C2=AD=C2=A2=C2=B3=C3=A2z=C3=97=C2=A7 =C2=B0K=C5-=C3=8Ba=C2=B6=C3=9A=7F=C3=0C0=84=A2=C2=ABk=C2=A2 x=C5=93=C2=B1=C3=8A&=C3=BC=C3'=C2=AF=C5-=06=C2=AD=C2=A2=C2=B3=C3=A2z=C3=97 =C2=A7=C2=B0K=C5-=C3=8B=7Fh=C3=13D=C3=A3H %=9E=04S =98P=C3=84=99jg =C2=AD=C3=C2=ADr=B0=C3=ADz{Z=93=C3=8A=1A =C2=BD=C2=A8=C2=A5i=C2=B9^=C2=BE&=C2=AD=C3=A5=C5=BElZ+=C2=BAk=1A -=C2=B7=C5=B8-=C3=9Bi=C3=C3=B7=C3=A8=C2=AE=C3=A9=C2=AC=84 =A2=C2=ABk=C2=A2x=C5=93=C2=B1=C3=8A&-=C3=9Bi=C3=C3=B7=C3=A8=C2=AE =C3=A9=C2=AC=84=A2=C2=ABk=C2=A2x=C5=93=C2=B1=C3=8A&=C3=BD=C2=A2=C3=A2=C2=B2 =C3=90=C2=A8=C5=BE=C3=9A=C3=A2n=C3=ABb=C2=A2u=C5=BEm(=C2=ADy8Z=C5=BEL=C2=A8=C2 =B9=C3=BA+=C3=8A=B9=C2=AB=C2=81=C3=A9=C3=9E=C2=AE=B9=C2=AC=C2=B2 =C3i=C2=A2=C2=BBLj=C3=9BC=C2=AD=C2=A9ex=C2=B8=C2=AC=C2=B4=07f=C5-v=C2=A1 =C2=AD=C3=A7=C3=A1=C2=B6=C3=9A=7F=C3=0C0=84=A2=C2=ABk=C2=A2x=C5=93=C2=B1 =C3=8A&=C3=BD=C3=8A'=C2=B6=C2=B8=BA=C2=BA=C3=98=C2=A8=C5=BE=1Bm=C2=A7=C3 =C3=B0=C3=83 =C5=A1=C2=B6=C2=BA'=B0=C3=8B=1C=C2=A2o=C3=9C=C2=A2{k =B0=C2=BB=C2=AD=C5-=B0=C3k=C3=B6=C3~=B0=C3=AD=C3=BE=C5 =A1=C3=9E=C3=BD=C2=BA=1D=C3=8B=C3=B8m=C5=A1 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5(at)comcast.net>
Subject: VNE at cruise- bungees versus springs landing gear
Date: Feb 19, 2015
________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jim Markle <jim_markle(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Visit with Chuck Campbell
Date: Feb 20, 2015
I had a very special experience last evening. I had the pleasure of meeting Chuck Campbell. Really enjoyed checking out his very close to plans (and r eady to cover) Pietenpol Air Camper. A very special gentleman. What a treat! Even walked out the door with a neat Pietenpol clock! Oh relax, he gave it t o me! Seriously, I am honored to have spent an evening with my new Pietenpol frien d and WW II veteran Chuck Campbell. Jim Markle Sent from my smartphone.

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Douwe Blumberg" <douweblumberg(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: covered wheels
Date: Feb 20, 2015
I never flew RE-PIET without covered wheels so I can't compare before and after. However, she seems to perform pretty straightforwardly and I have big honkin' wheels! Douwe ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 20, 2015
Subject: Re: VNE at cruise- bungees versus springs landing gear
From: Steven Dortch <steven.d.dortch(at)gmail.com>
Gary, you are firing blank rounds. Steve D On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Gary Boothe wrote: > > > * > > > * > > -- Blue Skies, Steve D ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: VNE at cruise- bungees versus springs landing gear
From: "Bill Church" <billspiet(at)sympatico.ca>
Date: Feb 20, 2015
Charles, Did the experienced pilot/instructor give any reasons for recommending bungees over springs? Aside from nostalgia, and keeping the 1930's look (which is a valid reason), I can't think of any practical reason. Bill C. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438527#438527 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 20, 2015
From: woodflier <woodflier(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: VNE at cruise- bungees versus springs landing gear
I built my Piet with the bungee shocks and had a partial gear collapse when one leg overextended. The safety cable was just a bit too long and I neede d to add more bungee cords to the shocks. The following winter I built die spring shocks and have had no problems since. You don't have to worry about the hassle of checking and replacing the cords every few years. And, I lik e that the springs work in compression rather than the cords being in tensi on. Matt Paxton NX629ML -----Original Message----- From: Charles Burkholder <born2fly(at)abcmailbox.net> Sent: Thu, Feb 19, 2015 8:57 pm Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: VNE at cruise- bungees versus springs landing gear Regarding bungee or spring landing gear. I am half done my split axle land ing gear but not at quite the shock absorbers. I am leaning towards using s teel spring due to the low maintenance "build, fly and forget" it offers. I was talking to a very experienced tailwheel pilot and instructor (not a ho mebuilder) about it and he recommended bungees. Could I have any input on the pro's and con's of each? How many of you bui lders have made the switch after your piet was built and why? If anything i t might add 1 knot to the cruise speed! On 2/19/2015 9:31 AM, Boatright, Jeffrey wrote: Switching from canvas-covered bungees to springs definitely changed how my Piet behaves when I throttle back for descent in the pattern. With the bung ees, the nose really dropped when I pulled the throttle to idle. This effec t is much less pronounced after we switched to springs. -- Jeffrey H. Boatright, PhD, FARVO Professor of Ophthalmology Emory University School of Medicine From: Douwe Blumberg < douweblumberg(at)earthlink.net> Reply-To: " pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com" < pietenpol-list@matro nics.com> Date: Thursday, February 19, 2015 at 9:19 AM To: " pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com" < pietenpol-list(at)matronics.c om> Subject: Pietenpol-List: VNE at cruise About the only way I can imagine my Piet exceeding VNE at cruise is with a JATO pack strapped between the wheels! In all seriousness, I think aerodynamic mods are fine if they don=99t add weight and you find it an enjoyable pursuit. After all, fun is why we build these things. However, don=99t expect too much from them and I=99ve often wondered if the extra effort and time added building, is worth an extra 3 kts cruising speed. I mean, when I=99m chugging ar ound for my average 30 minute summer flight, I couldn=99t care less h ow fast I=99m going. The ONLY time I ever wish I had a few extra kts of speed is going to Brodhead, but even then it would only shave off ten-f ifteen minutes or so. That being said. I did spend an extra month fairing the axle and covering the wire wheels. I have NO idea how much it helped having not flown without those mods. The biggest thing I could do to improve my cruise speed would be to fair or re shape my wood struts which have a poor aerodynamic shape, but again, I =99ve weighed the effort against the benefit and decided I=99d rat her spend the time flying her. I also experimented with some teardrop shap ed clear plastic tubing to fair the round cables. I did my landing gear ca bles, then decided against doing the flying wires because it would destroy the vintage look. But I do think round wires make a ton of drag which cou ld be at least halved by sleeving them. I think biggest drag inducers that could actually be helped are: struts, wh eels, strut connections, axle, windscreens, foot pegs, cables. $.02 Douwe This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the original message (including attachments). No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 02/19/15 ky=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD"=EF=BD=ED=9C=A2Z+=EF=BDM4=EF=BDG=EF =BDq=EF=BD(=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDw=EF=BDr=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=D3=85=EF=BD=EF=BDz=D7=A7=EF=BD=EF =BDK=EF=BD=EF=BDD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD\u0016=EF=BD=EF=BDK \u001E=EF=BD\u0017=EF=BDj=EF=BD=EF=BD',.+-\u0015=E6=AD=BA =EF =BD=EF=BD5=EF=BD=81=ABh=EF=BD=EF=BD\u001B=EF=BD=EF =BD,z=EF=BD^=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD.+-=EF=BD=D8=A5=EF=BD=D8=9E =EF=BD=CB=9C=EF=BD=EF=BD\u000B=EF=BD=EF=BDT=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BDn=EF=BD+=EF=BD=EF=BDb=EF=BDp+r\u0018=EF=BDy'=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BDC=EF=BD =E5=A1=A7{ =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD,x(Z=EF=BDP\u0010> -=EF=BD=EF=BDZ=EF=BD=EF=BDvk=EF =BD=EF=BDk=EF=BD=EF=BDj+y=EF=BDky=EF=BDm=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BD\u000C&j=EF=BD=EF=BD',r=EF=BD=EF=BD5=EF =BD=81=ABh=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDR=EF =BD=EF=BDm=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD\u000C&j=EF=BD=EF=BD ',r=EF=BD=EF=BD5=EF=BD=81=ABh=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BDR=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD0\u0004=EF=BD8=EF=BD \u0002Ia\u0001\u0014=EF=BDT1$=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD+y=EF=BD\=EF =BD{^=EF=BD=D6=A5=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDj)ZnW=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BDayg=EF=BD\u0016=EF=BD=EF=BD=C6=A1=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=7F=EF=BD=EF=BD+=EF=BDk&j=EF=BD=EF=BD',r=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=7F=EF=BD=EF=BD+=EF=BDk&j=EF=BD =EF=BD',r=EF=BD=EF=BDh=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD*'=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=D8=A8=EF=BDg=EF=BDJ+^N\u0016=EF=BD=EF=BD* .~=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDzw=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD,=EF =BD=EF=BDh=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDjY^.+-\u0001=D9 =A2=EF=BD=EF=BDky=EF=BDm=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD\u000C &j=EF=BD=EF=BD',r=EF=BD=EF=BDr=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD&=EF =BD*'=EF=BD=EF=BDi=EF=BD=EF=BD0=EF=BDf=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BDr=EF=BD(=EF=BD=EF=BD(=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD n=EF=BDb=EF=BD=7F=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=DF=A2{=7F=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BDn=EF=BDr=EF=BD\u001Bf -- Charles Burkholder Visit my blog @ http://missionmechfund.blogspot.ca/ ==== ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: VNE at cruise- bungees versus springs landing gear
From: "jarheadpilot82" <jarheadpilot82(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 20, 2015
Glen, Here is a link to a discussion about the replacement of bungees with die springs written a while back by William Wynne- http://flycorvair.net/2012/10/27/new-die-spring-landing-gear-on-a-pietenpol-10-a-m-4-p-m/ Below is a copy of the page of the catalog in which I have noted the die springs I ordered. They were , if memory serves, around $85 or $90, cheaper than I could find anywhere else. The contact info as at the bottom of the page. -------- Semper Fi, Terry Hand Athens, GA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438541#438541 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/diamondwirecatalog_dragged_177.pdf ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Visit with Chuck Campbell
From: "taildrags" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 20, 2015
Jim: you and Chuck look like a pair of aces. Or... maybe... a pair of jokers? ;o) By the way, happy birthday, Jim! -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438542#438542 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Pietenpol Rib Building [Video]
From: "Riegerb" <rieger.brian12(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 21, 2015
A sped-up time-lapse video of my dad building a rib for the Pietenpol. Now do it 32x fast! =) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GI59zR2rIsI&feature=youtu.be Brian -------- riegerpietenpol.tumblr.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438555#438555 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ray Krause <raykrause(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: Pietenpol Rib Building [Video]
Date: Feb 21, 2015
Neat! Keep up the good work. Only about five years to go! Ray Krause Sent from my iPad > On Feb 21, 2015, at 10:19 AM, Riegerb wrote: > > > A sped-up time-lapse video of my dad building a rib for the Pietenpol. Now do it 32x fast! =) > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GI59zR2rIsI&feature=youtu.be > > > Brian > > -------- > riegerpietenpol.tumblr.com > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438555#438555 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: New member and a few questions already
From: "Andy Garrett" <andy_garrett(at)live.com>
Date: Feb 21, 2015
Hi there, I'm Andy Garrett from Haysville, KS (suburb of Wichita). I recently sold my TEAM Airbike which I owned for a year, but did not build. At 6'2" and 255lbs, the little Rotax 447 was just not enough to get acceptable performance. I am now in possession of a new set of Pietenpol Air Camper plans with all the options, manual, the works. I also have Chet Peek's book The Pietenpol Story, and have poured over the Pietenpol website with a good email exchange with Andrerw Pietenpol--great guy. I also ordered William Wynn's Corvair conversion manual, but have not yet received it. I (like Andrew Pietenpol it seems) have completed a plans built mahogany boat designed by Glen L. Witt of Glen-L Marine. Thus, I have considerable experience with wood working tools, epoxies, paints and coatings, etc. So, I have confidence that my craftsmanship will be up to par. My questions are based on things I've read on a variety of websites and forums about the Piet. First: I will build the Air Camper as a single seat ship with a generous baggage compartment where the front seat would normally be. Second: I would like to entertain the possibility of a wider fuselage--just a few inches. To simplify this mod, I would like to widen the center section of the three-piece wing by an equal amount (I saw a widened center section on the 'West Coast Pietenpol' website). This might also allow for a slightly larger wing tank which appeals to me. I want long-legged cross country capability in this craft. Third: CG questions plague my mind with such a setup. Do I leave the rear seat where it is and make cabane angle adjustments? Should I make longer cabane struts to allow for this and to keep the pilot access flap out of my face? Forth: At my weight, do I target the 120HP Corvair for best climb performance or is this excessive for the mount/firewall? Finally: I want to keep usable load as high as possible, so I am leaning toward a built-up 'I' beam type spar as there is a considerable amount of information on this type available for homebuilts in general. Does anyone herein have experience with this method? I know I do not care for the idea of routing spars. I have yet to decide on gear type, but I'm leaning toward whatever is lightest with tall thin wheels. Sorry for my lack of brevity. I'm just eager to get some of these issues resolved in my mind so I can see the long path ahead and get started. Thanks for any and all assistance. -------- Andy Garrett 'General Purpose Creative Dude' Haysville, Kansas Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438558#438558 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "CatDesigns" <CatDesigns(at)att.net>
Subject: Pietenpol Rib Building [Video]
Date: Feb 21, 2015
Brian Wish I would have thought to have had my dad build the ribs. Would have been much quicker in the long run. It was nice meeting you and your dad at Ray's house. Chris Sacramento, CA WestcoastPiet.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Riegerb Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2015 10:19 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Pietenpol Rib Building [Video] --> A sped-up time-lapse video of my dad building a rib for the Pietenpol. Now do it 32x fast! =) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GI59zR2rIsI&feature=youtu.be Brian -------- riegerpietenpol.tumblr.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438555#438555 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe5(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Pietenpol Rib Building [Video]
Date: Feb 21, 2015
The right amount of coffee will do that, too. Nice job! Gary Boothe NX308MB -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of CatDesigns Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2015 2:44 PM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Pietenpol Rib Building [Video] Brian Wish I would have thought to have had my dad build the ribs. Would have been much quicker in the long run. It was nice meeting you and your dad at Ray's house. Chris Sacramento, CA WestcoastPiet.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Riegerb Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2015 10:19 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Pietenpol Rib Building [Video] --> A sped-up time-lapse video of my dad building a rib for the Pietenpol. Now do it 32x fast! =) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GI59zR2rIsI&feature=youtu.be Brian -------- riegerpietenpol.tumblr.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438555#438555 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: New member and a few questions already
From: glenschweizer(at)yahoo.com
Date: Feb 21, 2015
Hi Andy,welcome! My name is Glen. I've recently started an Aerial, the biplane version of the pietenpol developed by Chad Wille. I too plan to use a WW Corvair conversion. I had originally planned on the 120HP but have since decided to go with the 110HP instead. The 120 requires machine work on heads and case to use larger diameter cylinders. I don't want to pay shipping to Florida and back to have that done. I have widened the fuse on mine as well. It is 30" wide. My sister wants to ride and is a bit wider than a 13" wide seat would comfortably accomodate. There are a few other cosmetic mods, but you'll find that no two pietenpol "snowflakes" are alike. Mr. Pietenpol designed a very rugged Airplane. When using the Corvair engine you'll be building a stretched fuse for CG reasons(see West Coast Piet site). So many of these airplanes have been built over the past 85 years that many successful changes have been made. Realize that every change will effect something else. Have more experienced people check your ideas and work. ASK LOTS OF QUESTIONS...this forum has lots of very knowledgable members. No such thing as a dumb question . Look in the archives as well. Your question has probably been asked and answered before. Sorry to ramble. Again,welcome,and enjoy your build. You'll be surprised at how fast components become identifiable as airplane parts. I've been working on mine for three week ends. By quitin time tomorrow, fuse will be boxed. All the best, Glen Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 21, 2015, at 2:01 PM, "Andy Garrett" wrote: > > > Hi there, > > I'm Andy Garrett from Haysville, KS (suburb of Wichita). I recently sold my TEAM Airbike which I owned for a year, but did not build. At 6'2" and 255lbs, the little Rotax 447 was just not enough to get acceptable performance. > > I am now in possession of a new set of Pietenpol Air Camper plans with all the options, manual, the works. I also have Chet Peek's book The Pietenpol Story, and have poured over the Pietenpol website with a good email exchange with Andrerw Pietenpol--great guy. > > I also ordered William Wynn's Corvair conversion manual, but have not yet received it. > > I (like Andrew Pietenpol it seems) have completed a plans built mahogany boat designed by Glen L. Witt of Glen-L Marine. Thus, I have considerable experience with wood working tools, epoxies, paints and coatings, etc. So, I have confidence that my craftsmanship will be up to par. > > My questions are based on things I've read on a variety of websites and forums about the Piet. > > First: I will build the Air Camper as a single seat ship with a generous baggage compartment where the front seat would normally be. > > Second: I would like to entertain the possibility of a wider fuselage--just a few inches. To simplify this mod, I would like to widen the center section of the three-piece wing by an equal amount (I saw a widened center section on the 'West Coast Pietenpol' website). This might also allow for a slightly larger wing tank which appeals to me. I want long-legged cross country capability in this craft. > > Third: CG questions plague my mind with such a setup. Do I leave the rear seat where it is and make cabane angle adjustments? Should I make longer cabane struts to allow for this and to keep the pilot access flap out of my face? > > Forth: At my weight, do I target the 120HP Corvair for best climb performance or is this excessive for the mount/firewall? > > Finally: I want to keep usable load as high as possible, so I am leaning toward a built-up 'I' beam type spar as there is a considerable amount of information on this type available for homebuilts in general. Does anyone herein have experience with this method? I know I do not care for the idea of routing spars. > > I have yet to decide on gear type, but I'm leaning toward whatever is lightest with tall thin wheels. > > Sorry for my lack of brevity. I'm just eager to get some of these issues resolved in my mind so I can see the long path ahead and get started. > > Thanks for any and all assistance. > > -------- > Andy Garrett > 'General Purpose Creative Dude' > Haysville, Kansas > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438558#438558 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Philips" <jack(at)bedfordlandings.com>
Subject: New member and a few questions already
Date: Feb 22, 2015
Hi Andy, Welcome to the wonderful world of Pietenpols, and Pietenpeople! First a couple of boilerplate items for new builders: 1. Are you a member of EAA? If not, I would recommend joining, particularly if there is a good local chapter near you. EAA has had its problems lately, but it still is the only organization actively promoting your right to build and fly your own airplane, and as such it deserves your support. If your local chapter has a Tech Counselor, that can be an enormous help for you in building your own airplane. 2. Buy and READ the four books by Tony Bingelis (available through EAA): The Sportplane Builder, Sportplane Construction Techniques, Firewall Forward, and Tony Bingelis on Engines. There is a wealth of information in those books and many of your questions about how to do some of the tasks required to build a Pietenpol will be answered. 3. Since you will almost certainly be maintaining your own airplane I strongly recommend a book called "Sky Ranch Engineering Manual", by John Schwaner. It was recommended to me by William Wynne and I bought a copy on Amazon and love it! It is a Bible on how to inspect and repair everything in your engine. 4. Join the Brodhead Pietenpol Association (BPA). Its newsletter generally contains good building tips and other articles on all things Pietenpol. Now to answer some of your questions: Second: I would like to entertain the possibility of a wider fuselage--just a few inches. To simplify this mod, I would like to widen the center section of the three-piece wing by an equal amount (I saw a widened center section on the 'West Coast Pietenpol' website). This might also allow for a slightly larger wing tank which appeals to me. I want long-legged cross country capability in this craft. I would caution against this for a couple of reasons. First, I did this on mine before trying sitting in "standard width" fuselages. I'm 6'2" and 195 lbs and I find I fit just fine in a standard sized fuselage. Mine is 1" wider and yes, it does have more room, but not enough to be really noticeable. The reason I recommend against it is that a change like that ripples through the entire design. I'm a design engineer and I was able to anticipate and think through all the changes required by my decision to widen the fuselage, but it was still troublesome. It was also EXPENSIVE because the standard design very efficiently utilizes a standard sheet of plywood. Making the fuselage wider suddenly requires using more than half a sheet of plywood for the floorboard and you end up buying and wasting a lot more material. I would recommend that before you commit to such a change, you should go to Brodhead this summer and sit in as many varieties of Pietenpols as you can find (after asking permission, of course) and see if you can fit in them. I also made my centersection 6" wider to allow more fuel to be carried. I have an A65 Continental engine in mine that burns 4-1/2 gallons per hour. My tank holds 16 gallons of fuel, giving me almost 3 hours of endurance, with a 45 minute reserve. I can tell you after 10 years of flying mine on some pretty long cross countries that I have never flown it for 3 hours at one stretch. I start getting restless and need to get out and stretch my legs after about 90 minutes, and after 2 hours I've GOT to get out and rest. Having extra fuel when you need it is a good thing, I agree. In 2013 I flew it to Brodhead along with Gene Rambo in his 1927 Travel Air and Matt Paxton in his Pietenpol. We landed at Greene County, Pennsylvania for fuel, but found that a truck had hit a utility pole, knocking out their power. They had plenty of gas but no way to pump it. We had to fly on to the next airport west of us in Moundsville, WV before we could refuel. That day I was glad to have plenty of fuel on board, but if you plan your legs with enough reserve to get to the next airport, you won't need a bigger centersection. Third: CG questions plague my mind with such a setup. Do I leave the rear seat where it is and make cabane angle adjustments? Should I make longer cabane struts to allow for this and to keep the pilot access flap out of my face? Here again I would recommend against changing the plans. Keep the seat where it is and plan to shift the wing aft for CG control. This is what most builders do and it works well. Most also do make the cabane struts longer to ease entry and egress. Forth: At my weight, do I target the 120HP Corvair for best climb performance or is this excessive for the mount/firewall? Read William Wynne's manual when you get it and make your decision based on his recommendations. If you are going to use a Corvair, use the parts and methods he recommends. Or use a certified aircraft engine like an A65, a C-85 or O-200 Continental. As I said, I have an A65 Continental in mine and I wish I had an extra 20 horsepower, but my Pietenpol is heavy at 745 lbs, and I fly in the mountains. For flying in Kansas or anywhere else in the Midwest, I think 65 hp would be plenty. While on that subject I recommend keeping it as light as possible. The best flying Pietenpol I ever flew was John Hofmann's N502R. It is very light and built very close to the plans. Mike Cuy's also flies better than mine because it is 113 lbs lighter than mine. I made a number of choices that increased the weight of mine (such as widening the fuselage, which required more wood, more fabric and more paint) that I wish I had not done. Finally: I want to keep usable load as high as possible, so I am leaning toward a built-up 'I' beam type spar as there is a considerable amount of information on this type available for homebuilts in general. Does anyone herein have experience with this method? I know I do not care for the idea of routing spars. I have yet to decide on gear type, but I'm leaning toward whatever is lightest with tall thin wheels. There are a number of Pietenpols flying with built up I Beam spars, including Mike Cuy's. I routed my spars and don't know why you wouldn't want to use that method, but to each his own. As for gear type, I can say that the lightest gear is the so-called "Cub Type" gear (that preceded the Piper Cub by at least 4 years). The heaviest is the straight axle gear with wire wheels, such as I have on mine. My wheels (complete with tires, tubes and brakes) weigh 25 lbs apiece. Using 6.00 x 6 wheels should cut that in half. You have good questions and it's obvious you are doing a lot of thinking about your project. Keep it up and continue to gather as much knowledge and data as you can. You'll find this to be one of the most rewarding experiences of your whole life. Good Luck! Jack Phillips NX899JP Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 22, 2015
Subject: Re: New member and a few questions already
From: Steven Dortch <steven.d.dortch(at)gmail.com>
Andy, welcome to the fold. What follows is just my opinion, I am one of the lesser experienced Piet guys. 1. No front pax. I would suggest just building to plans, and then put light temporary structure in to carry baggage. Then dont put in the front controls, seatbelt, instruments or a wind screen. then put a cover on it. Then If you want to later you can add a windscreen and a seatbelt. permanent structure will not allow for flexibility later. 2. Try one on before you go with widening the fuselage. Mine is to plans and I am not the most svelt pilot (5'8" and 200 LBS). The cockpit is pretty wide. Getting in and out is where your size will get in the way the most. making the plane longer has been done and I think plans are out there. You might look at building the instrument panel forward as much as possible. (not changing the plans.) I find the rear cockpit to be small from front to rear, IE the instruments are "in my face." I would like them back some. Also you can widen the holes where your feet go and scoot the pedals forward some. For additional range, instead of widening the wing tank, Consider a "header" type tank like a J3 cub. My plane has both and has more than enough fuel. 3. Cabane lengthening sounds good and has been done, But that is outside my experience. My plane does not have the flop, that is another way to "get it out of your face" just have a cutout. Cabanes can also be adjusted to help with CG. 4. Put in the engine you want. I have an A65 but If I were to start from scratch I would go with a corvair. 5. On keeping useable load as high as possible, Stick with the plans. Almost all mods add to the weight. There are experts on this list about the spars and such. 6. Gear type. Use the wheels you want, I would go with springs instead of bungees. I have bungees and will convert when the bungees wear out. Welcome to the list. Blue Skies, Steve D On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Jack Philips wrote: > Hi Andy, > > > Welcome to the wonderful world of Pietenpols, and Pietenpeople! > > > First a couple of boilerplate items for new builders: > > > 1. Are you a member of EAA? If not, I would recommend joining, > particularly if there is a good local chapter near you. EAA has had its > problems lately, but it still is the only organization actively promoting > your right to build and fly your own airplane, and as such it deserves yo ur > support. If your local chapter has a Tech Counselor, that can be an > enormous help for you in building your own airplane. > > > 2. Buy and READ the four books by Tony Bingelis (available through EAA): > The Sportplane Builder, Sportplane Construction Techniques, Firewall > Forward, and Tony Bingelis on Engines. There is a wealth of information in > those books and many of your questions about how to do some of the tasks > required to build a Pietenpol will be answered. > > > 3. Since you will almost certainly be maintaining your own airplane I > strongly recommend a book called "Sky Ranch Engineering Manual", by John > Schwaner. It was recommended to me by William Wynne and I bought a copy on > Amazon and love it! It is a Bible on how to inspect and repair everythin g > in your engine. > > > 4. Join the Brodhead Pietenpol Association (BPA). Its newsletter > generally contains good building tips and other articles on all things > Pietenpol. > > > Now to answer some of your questions: > > > Second: I would like to entertain the possibility of a wider > fuselage--just a few inches. To simplify this mod, I would like to widen > the center section of the three-piece wing by an equal amount (I saw a > widened center section on the 'West Coast Pietenpol' website). This might > also allow for a slightly larger wing tank which appeals to me. I want > long-legged cross country capability in this craft. > > > I would caution against this for a couple of reasons. First, I did this > on mine before trying sitting in =9Cstandard width=9D fuselag es. I=99m 6=992=9D and > 195 lbs and I find I fit just fine in a standard sized fuselage. Mine is > 1=9D wider and yes, it does have more room, but not enough to be re ally > noticeable. The reason I recommend against it is that a change like that > ripples through the entire design. I=99m a design engineer and I w as able to > anticipate and think through all the changes required by my decision to > widen the fuselage, but it was still troublesome. It was also EXPENSIVE > because the standard design very efficiently utilizes a standard sheet of > plywood. Making the fuselage wider suddenly requires using more than hal f > a sheet of plywood for the floorboard and you end up buying and wasting a > lot more material. I would recommend that before you commit to such a > change, you should go to Brodhead this summer and sit in as many varietie s > of Pietenpols as you can find (after asking permission, of course) and se e > if you can fit in them. > > > I also made my centersection 6=9D wider to allow more fuel to be ca rried. I > have an A65 Continental engine in mine that burns 4-1/2 gallons per hour. > My tank holds 16 gallons of fuel, giving me almost 3 hours of endurance, > with a 45 minute reserve. I can tell you after 10 years of flying mine o n > some pretty long cross countries that I have never flown it for 3 hours a t > one stretch. I start getting restless and need to get out and stretch my > legs after about 90 minutes, and after 2 hours I=99ve GOT to get ou t and > rest. Having extra fuel when you need it is a good thing, I agree. In > 2013 I flew it to Brodhead along with Gene Rambo in his 1927 Travel Air a nd > Matt Paxton in his Pietenpol. We landed at Greene County, Pennsylvania f or > fuel, but found that a truck had hit a utility pole, knocking out their > power. They had plenty of gas but no way to pump it. We had to fly on t o > the next airport west of us in Moundsville, WV before we could refuel. > That day I was glad to have plenty of fuel on board, but if you plan your > legs with enough reserve to get to the next airport, you won=99t ne ed a > bigger centersection. > > > Third: CG questions plague my mind with such a setup. Do I leave the rear > seat where it is and make cabane angle adjustments? Should I make longer > cabane struts to allow for this and to keep the pilot access flap out of my > face? > > > Here again I would recommend against changing the plans. Keep the seat > where it is and plan to shift the wing aft for CG control. This is what > most builders do and it works well. Most also do make the cabane struts > longer to ease entry and egress. > > > Forth: At my weight, do I target the 120HP Corvair for best climb > performance or is this excessive for the mount/firewall? > > > Read William Wynne=99s manual when you get it and make your decisio n based > on his recommendations. If you are going to use a Corvair, use the parts > and methods he recommends. Or use a certified aircraft engine like an A6 5, > a C-85 or O-200 Continental. As I said, I have an A65 Continental in mi ne > and I wish I had an extra 20 horsepower, but my Pietenpol is heavy at 745 > lbs, and I fly in the mountains. For flying in Kansas or anywhere else i n > the Midwest, I think 65 hp would be plenty. > > > While on that subject I recommend keeping it as light as possible. The > best flying Pietenpol I ever flew was John Hofmann=99s N502R. It i s very > light and built very close to the plans. Mike Cuy=99s also flies b etter than > mine because it is 113 lbs lighter than mine. I made a number of choices > that increased the weight of mine (such as widening the fuselage, which > required more wood, more fabric and more paint) that I wish I had not don e. > > > Finally: I want to keep usable load as high as possible, so I am leaning > toward a built-up 'I' beam type spar as there is a considerable amount of > information on this type available for homebuilts in general. Does anyone > herein have experience with this method? I know I do not care for the ide a > of routing spars. > > > I have yet to decide on gear type, but I'm leaning toward whatever is > lightest with tall thin wheels. > > > There are a number of Pietenpols flying with built up I Beam spars, > including Mike Cuy=99s. I routed my spars and don=99t know w hy you wouldn=99t > want to use that method, but to each his own. As for gear type, I can sa y > that the lightest gear is the so-called =9CCub Type=9D gear ( that preceded the > Piper Cub by at least 4 years). The heaviest is the straight axle gear > with wire wheels, such as I have on mine. My wheels (complete with tires , > tubes and brakes) weigh 25 lbs apiece. Using 6.00 x 6 wheels should cut > that in half. > > > You have good questions and it=99s obvious you are doing a lot of t hinking > about your project. Keep it up and continue to gather as much knowledge > and data as you can. You=99ll find this to be one of the most rewa rding > experiences of your whole life. > > > Good Luck! > > > Jack Phillips > > NX899JP > > Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia > > > * > =========== .matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List> =========== =========== om/contribution> =========== > > * > > -- Blue Skies, Steve D ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Pietenpol Rib Building [Video]
From: "taildrags" <taildrags(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 22, 2015
There is a very useful detail in this video that will be missed by the new builder who doesn't notice it as it goes by so fast. As the individual vertical and diagonal sticks are placed in the jig, notice the sections of dowel that slip over pins (headless nails) on the jig board. These are used to hold those pieces in place as the glue cures. It is not immediately obvious, but the holes in the dowels can be drilled slightly off-center so that they can be rotated and the camming action snugs the sticks into place. Very nice preparation and methodology! -------- Oscar Zuniga Medford, OR Air Camper NX41CC "Scout" A75 power Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438583#438583 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Pietenpol Rib Building [Video]
From: Michael Groah <dskogrover(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Feb 22, 2015
Looks great! Keep up the nice work. It will be a beautiful plane I'm sure. I missed out on coming up to Ray's place but maybe I'll get the chance to meet you at the West Coast Pietenpol gathering. Mike Groah Sent from my iPad > On Feb 21, 2015, at 10:19 AM, "Riegerb" wrote: > > > A sped-up time-lapse video of my dad building a rib for the Pietenpol. Now do it 32x fast! =) > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GI59zR2rIsI&feature=youtu.be > > > Brian > > -------- > riegerpietenpol.tumblr.com > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438555#438555 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: New member and a few questions already
From: "Andy Garrett" <andy_garrett(at)live.com>
Date: Feb 22, 2015
Thank you so much for the well considered responses! I'm very happy I signed up here! For the record, I am an EAA member both nationally and a new member of the local chapter, #88. I also sent in my application and check to the BPA. I have a friend and former hangar mate who assisted me with my Airbike purchase and learning who is active in Chapter 88 and just exceeded 1000hrs in the Airbike he finished in 1997. I am led to believe that he has more hours in that airframe than any pilot alive, but I could be wrong. In any case, he is a wealth of building knowledge to tap when needed. I will acquire the recommended books immediately. I just finished the Piet manual for the first read through. I anticipate many more. I guess I need to find a Piet within driving distance and try it on for size before further considering mods in the cockpit size. Thanks again for the great food for thought. More questions pop up every day, but I will try to keep them coming at a reasonable rate. [Wink] -------- Andy Garrett 'General Purpose Creative Dude' Haysville, Kansas Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438588#438588 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: New member and a few questions already
From: "Jeff Boatright" <jeffboatright(at)emory.edu>
Date: Feb 22, 2015
Hi Andy, I echo what Jack said. Sit in an Aircamper- sit in several!, make sure you really need make the changes you're pondering. My Piet has been flown by some pretty big guys (I think the biggest topped 6'3" and 230 lbs). No problem with width or with pedal placement. Taller cabanes help. Move the wing to get the CG right. Use a flop or a cutout. I had bungees, now have springs in compression; like 'em better. I have a 12 gallon wing tank and an 11 gallon "header" tank. Hardly ever use the wing tank. I had an A-65, now have a C-85. I think it's the ideal engine for the Piet, but YMMV. If you go Corvair, follow the advice of The Corvair Authority, Wm. Wynne, but buy your parts from him as soon as you can or they'll never arrive in time for the next College (and you will really have fun at the College - I did!). HTH, Jeff Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438591#438591 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "CatDesigns" <CatDesigns(at)att.net>
Subject: New member and a few questions already
Date: Feb 22, 2015
Andy The advice to find a Pietenpol to sit in is correct however make note of what the fuselage length is, long vs short, and any modifications made to the seating area. When I purchased my hinges from Vi Kapler, I asked him about modifications he would recommend for tall people. If you don't know Mr. Kapler used to know and work for Mr. Pietenpol and sadly passed away recently. This is what he wrote to me "I am 6'-4" and weigh 200 pounds. If you use the long fuselage plans and cut out the knee holes a little bigger and raise the wing 2" from what the plans show you will have enough room. Also you can lean the back rest on the seat back 2 inches on the top"." You will also need to move the wing back 3 1/2 inches or more depending on your weight and what engine you use." I have made all these changes to my plane with the addition of lowering the seat as much as I could and still have room for the cables under the seat. I am 6'-1" and I fit fine with these changes. Bill Rewey and others have made a 3' center section. Bill used to sell a package of Pietenpol suggestions, of which the center section is one. I wouldn't widen the fuselage. You could gain a few inches by starting the taper behind the back seat instead of at the back of the front seat. I seem to recall someone doing this. Built up spars have been used. Mike Cuy is one, http://westcoastpiet.com/images/Mike%20Cuy%20A-65%20Piet/images/Pietspar.jpg I have also seen some with plywood webs but I don't know if they are flying. You can also use 3/4" non-routed spars. The split axel gear on the Improved Air Camper plans will be the lightest. Chris Sacramento, CA WestcoastPiet.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Andy Garrett Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2015 2:01 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: New member and a few questions already --> Hi there, I'm Andy Garrett from Haysville, KS (suburb of Wichita). I recently sold my TEAM Airbike which I owned for a year, but did not build. At 6'2" and 255lbs, the little Rotax 447 was just not enough to get acceptable performance. I am now in possession of a new set of Pietenpol Air Camper plans with all the options, manual, the works. I also have Chet Peek's book The Pietenpol Story, and have poured over the Pietenpol website with a good email exchange with Andrerw Pietenpol--great guy. I also ordered William Wynn's Corvair conversion manual, but have not yet received it. I (like Andrew Pietenpol it seems) have completed a plans built mahogany boat designed by Glen L. Witt of Glen-L Marine. Thus, I have considerable experience with wood working tools, epoxies, paints and coatings, etc. So, I have confidence that my craftsmanship will be up to par. My questions are based on things I've read on a variety of websites and forums about the Piet. First: I will build the Air Camper as a single seat ship with a generous baggage compartment where the front seat would normally be. Second: I would like to entertain the possibility of a wider fuselage--just a few inches. To simplify this mod, I would like to widen the center section of the three-piece wing by an equal amount (I saw a widened center section on the 'West Coast Pietenpol' website). This might also allow for a slightly larger wing tank which appeals to me. I want long-legged cross country capability in this craft. Third: CG questions plague my mind with such a setup. Do I leave the rear seat where it is and make cabane angle adjustments? Should I make longer cabane struts to allow for this and to keep the pilot access flap out of my face? Forth: At my weight, do I target the 120HP Corvair for best climb performance or is this excessive for the mount/firewall? Finally: I want to keep usable load as high as possible, so I am leaning toward a built-up 'I' beam type spar as there is a considerable amount of information on this type available for homebuilts in general. Does anyone herein have experience with this method? I know I do not care for the idea of routing spars. I have yet to decide on gear type, but I'm leaning toward whatever is lightest with tall thin wheels. Sorry for my lack of brevity. I'm just eager to get some of these issues resolved in my mind so I can see the long path ahead and get started. Thanks for any and all assistance. -------- Andy Garrett 'General Purpose Creative Dude' Haysville, Kansas Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438558#438558 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: VNE at cruise- bungees versus springs landing gear
From: "biplan53" <biplan53(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Feb 22, 2015
Terry you can also buy the spring assembly already built from Wag Aero. You only have to measure and put the ends on them. The only down side is they cost about 298.00. I think they are on page 40. Hope this helps someone. -------- Building steel fuselage aircamper. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438599#438599 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 23, 2015
From: danhelsper(at)aol.com
Subject: Four-bladed prop
Hello Pieter's, As you might remember about two years ago I carved this prop from white ash, 44 pitch and 72" diameter. As it turned out it was too large and the ole model A could only turn 1600 RPM and 220 lbs on the Official Pietenpol List Fish Scale(s). I have now completed trimming each blade by 1-1/2" and really thinning the blades also. It is now 69" diameter. I hope to test it in the coming weeks. Dan Helsper Loensloe Airfield Puryear, TN ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Four-bladed prop
From: "womenfly2" <Love2Fly.KAP(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 23, 2015
What calculation did you do for the D X P? How about the soildarity of the prop at RPM, being 4-blades you need to look at that. WF2 -------- Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438602#438602 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 23, 2015
From: danhelsper(at)aol.com
Subject: Re: Four-bladed prop
I did no calculations. Only used anecdotal information from others (and my own experience) What is soildarity? I am assuming you mean solidarity. Relying on the glue to hold the thing together. Dan Helsper Loensloe Airfield Puryear, TN -----Original Message----- From: womenfly2 <Love2Fly.KAP(at)gmail.com> Sent: Mon, Feb 23, 2015 6:29 am Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Four-bladed prop What calculation did you do for the D X P? How about the soildarity of the prop at RPM, being 4-blades you need to look at that. WF2 -------- Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438602#438602 - The Pietenpol-List Email Forum - Navigator to browse Un/Subscription, Photoshare, and much much more: http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - Forums! http://forums.matronics.com - List Contribution Web Site - -Matt Dralle, List Admin. http://www.matronics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-LME0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Subject: Visit with Chuck Campbell
Date: Feb 23, 2015
Jim-- what a GREAT story and photos about you visiting with Chuck Campbell!!!! We are honored to have you among us Chuck and to be active, building and doing your thing still is just fantastic. On my wish list for this summer: to go visit Chuck Campbell! Mike C. -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jim Markle Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:07 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Visit with Chuck Campbell I had a very special experience last evening. I had the pleasure of meeting Chuck Campbell. Really enjoyed checking out his very close to plans (and ready to cover) Pietenpol Air Camper. A very special gentleman. What a treat! Even walked out the door with a neat Pietenpol clock! Oh relax, he gave it to me! Seriously, I am honored to have spent an evening with my new Pietenpol friend and WW II veteran Chuck Campbell. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 23, 2015
From: goffelectric(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: Visit with Chuck Campbell
I met Chuck at Corvair College in Barnwell where he ran his engine for the first time. He is a great guy! You definitly want to make that trip to meet him this summer. Keith Goff ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael D. Cuy (GRC-LME0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" <michael.d.cuy@nas a.gov> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 8:47:13 AM Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Visit with Chuck Campbell artners, LLC]" Jim-- what a GREAT story and photos about you visiting with Chuck Campbell! !!! We are honored to have you among us Chuck and to be active, building and do ing your thing still =C2-is just fantastic. On my wish list for this summer: =C2- to go visit Chuck Campbell! Mike C. -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-lis t-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jim Markle Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:07 AM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Visit with Chuck Campbell I had a very special experience last evening. =C2-I had the pleasure of m eeting =C2-Chuck Campbell. =C2-Really enjoyed checking out his very clo se to plans (and ready to cover) Pietenpol Air Camper. =C2-A very special gentleman. What a treat! Even walked out the door with a neat Pietenpol clock! =C2-Oh relax, he ga ve it to me! Seriously, I am honored to have spent an evening with my new Pietenpol frie nd and WW II veteran Chuck Campbell. =C2- =========== =========== MS - =========== e - =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2--Matt Dralle, List Admin. =========== ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Douwe Blumberg" <douweblumberg(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Vi's Piet
Date: Feb 23, 2015
Hey all, Does anyone know the what's happened to Vi's last Ford powered plane now that he's deceased. It was a beauty and I sure hope someone gets it who will get it flying rather than stashed in a museum somewhere. Douwe ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dave Abramson" <davea(at)symbolicdisplays.com>
Subject: Four-bladed prop
Date: Feb 23, 2015
VERY COOL DAN!!!!!! DAVE Ca. no not archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of danhelsper(at)aol.com Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 4:18 AM To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com; danhelsper(at)aol.com Subject: Pietenpol-List: Four-bladed prop Hello Pieter's, As you might remember about two years ago I carved this prop from white ash, 44 pitch and 72" diameter. As it turned out it was too large and the ole model A could only turn 1600 RPM and 220 lbs on the Official Pietenpol List Fish Scale(s). I have now completed trimming each blade by 1-1/2" and really thinning the blades also. It is now 69" diameter. I hope to test it in the coming weeks. Dan Helsper Loensloe Airfield Puryear, TN ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 23, 2015
Subject: steel
From: Steven Dortch <steven.d.dortch(at)gmail.com>
What are the advantages/disadvantages of making parts from stainless steel vs carbon steel. Weight? workability? -- Blue Skies, Steve D ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 23, 2015
Subject: Re: Visit with Chuck Campbell
From: "Charles N. Campbell" <charlescampbell1924(at)gmail.com>
Michael, you are welcome anytime. (Except after 9:00 PM[?]). Chuck On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-LME0)[Vantage Partners, LLC] wrote: > Partners, LLC]" > > Jim-- what a GREAT story and photos about you visiting with Chuck > Campbell!!!! > > We are honored to have you among us Chuck and to be active, building and > doing your thing still is just fantastic. > On my wish list for this summer: to go visit Chuck Campbell! > > Mike C. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto: > owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jim Markle > Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:07 AM > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Visit with Chuck Campbell > > I had a very special experience last evening. I had the pleasure of > meeting Chuck Campbell. Really enjoyed checking out his very close to > plans (and ready to cover) Pietenpol Air Camper. A very special gentleman. > > What a treat! > > Even walked out the door with a neat Pietenpol clock! Oh relax, he gave > it to me! > > Seriously, I am honored to have spent an evening with my new Pietenpol > friend and WW II veteran Chuck Campbell. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: New member and a few questions already
From: "Andy Garrett" <andy_garrett(at)live.com>
Date: Feb 23, 2015
Thanks again gang! I mocked up a space on the floor last night to a 22" width. I think I can live with it in general, but my specific concern is control manipulation for the throttle and stick--not much elbow room for movement. Yet, I am more confident with leaving this mod off of the list. Thanks for the sound advice. Likewise, a wing tank augmented by a header tank will be plenty of fuel for my purposes--sold. This allows me to build very close to the plans. Where I will still deviate somewhat, is the forward cockpit. I will add no controls or dash. Any seat will be a seat only in the academic sense. VERY narrow, no padding, no safety harness, no windscreen, webbing installed for baggage, and a hard cover over the opening to facilitate my intended aesthetic work. I understand that this may impact resale value, but I am building this ship for my use and resale is not a consideration in the design. I think a split axle with springs is the way to go on gear, but I really like the wooden gear (love to put an painted airfoil over the axle). Because of where I will be operating, a steerable tailwheel is almost required. Brakes ARE required. However, I love the idea of a rudder bar, not to mention that this allows me to stick closer to the plans. The manual mentions a 'tailwheel control stick'. I interpret this as a separate control in the cockpit to manage ground handling. Does anyone herein have such a set-up? Penny for your thoughts. I don't mind getting really creative and 'out of the box' here. -------- Andy Garrett 'General Purpose Creative Dude' Haysville, Kansas Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438616#438616 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 23, 2015
Subject: Re: Visit with Chuck Campbell
From: "Charles N. Campbell" <charlescampbell1924(at)gmail.com>
I'll change that last post! ANY OF YOU is welcome anytime (even you, Keith). Chuck On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-LME0)[Vantage Partners, LLC] wrote: > Partners, LLC]" > > Jim-- what a GREAT story and photos about you visiting with Chuck > Campbell!!!! > > We are honored to have you among us Chuck and to be active, building and > doing your thing still is just fantastic. > On my wish list for this summer: to go visit Chuck Campbell! > > Mike C. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto: > owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jim Markle > Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:07 AM > To: pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Visit with Chuck Campbell > > I had a very special experience last evening. I had the pleasure of > meeting Chuck Campbell. Really enjoyed checking out his very close to > plans (and ready to cover) Pietenpol Air Camper. A very special gentleman. > > What a treat! > > Even walked out the door with a neat Pietenpol clock! Oh relax, he gave > it to me! > > Seriously, I am honored to have spent an evening with my new Pietenpol > friend and WW II veteran Chuck Campbell. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 23, 2015
Subject: Re: Four-bladed prop
From: "Charles N. Campbell" <charlescampbell1924(at)gmail.com>
Dan, haven't heard from you for a while. Where you been? C On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Dave Abramson wrote: > VERY COOL DAN!!!!!! > > DAVE > > Ca. > > no not archive > > -----Original Message----- > *From:* owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto: > owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com]*On Behalf Of * > danhelsper(at)aol.com > *Sent:* Monday, February 23, 2015 4:18 AM > *To:* pietenpol-list(at)matronics.com; danhelsper(at)aol.com > *Subject:* Pietenpol-List: Four-bladed prop > > Hello Pieter's, > > As you might remember about two years ago I carved this prop from white > ash, 44 pitch and 72" diameter. As it turned out it was too large and the > ole model A could only turn 1600 RPM and 220 lbs on the Official Pietenpol > List Fish Scale(s). I have now completed trimming each blade by 1-1/2" and > really thinning the blades also. It is now 69" diameter. I hope to test it > in the coming weeks. > > Dan Helsper > Loensloe Airfield > Puryear, TN > > * > > > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 23, 2015
From: Jim Boyer <boyerjrb(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: steel
Hi Steve, Drilling holes in stainless is much harder. My firwall is stainless and eve ry hole I had to drill turned the drill bit red at the tip during drilling. Jim B. =C2- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Philips" <jack(at)bedfordlandings.com>
Subject: Re: New member and a few questions already
Date: Feb 23, 2015
Andy, I have no idea what a tailwheel control stick is. I never got the builders manual when I bought my Pietenpol plans, but I got mine from Don Pietenpol (BHP's son) rather than from Andrew. Most airplanes with steel tube structures just tie the tailwheel indirectly (using coil springs) to the rudder via a small control horn at the bottom of the rudder. However with a lightweight wooden rudder such as the Pietenpol has, that's not a good idea as it can put some pretty severe torsion loads on the rudder. So many Pietenpol builders tie an extra set of cables to the rudder bar to steer the tailwheel. These cables are either attached directly to the rudder bar or are attached to the rudder cable somewhere aft of the cockpit using nicopress fittings. In general, you don't want as much deflection of the tailwheel as you do the rudder since it is operating directly against pavement and a little deflection goes a long way in steering. Tying the tailwheel steering cable to the rudder cable can make tailwheel steering very sensitive. I solved this problem by running the tailwheel steering cables all the way to the rudder bar and attaching them about halfway out on the rudder bar, rather than at the outboard ends where the rudder cables attach. I arrived at that ratio by measuring the tailwheel steering horn of a J-3 Cub and comparing it to the rudder cable attach horn. It seems to work very well, and the tailwheel steering on my Pietenpol is powerful enough to control it well on the ground without being overly sensitive. Above is a photo showing my tailwheel steering installation (forward is toward the top of the picture). You can see the tailwheel steering cables coming off the rudder bar about halfway out on either side. The tailwheel steering cables then are directed under the floorboard by the pulleys visible in the photo to get them out of the way. This is just one way to accomplish this task. One of the great joys of building a Pietenpol is figuring out how to solve problems like this, and then figuring out a way to implement your solution. Good Luck! Jack Phillips NX899JP Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Andy Garrett Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 2:01 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: New member and a few questions already --> < andy_garrett(at)live.com> Thanks again gang! I mocked up a space on the floor last night to a 22" width. I think I can live with it in general, but my specific concern is control manipulation for the throttle and stick--not much elbow room for movement. Yet, I am more confident with leaving this mod off of the list. Thanks for the sound advice. Likewise, a wing tank augmented by a header tank will be plenty of fuel for my purposes--sold. This allows me to build very close to the plans. Where I will still deviate somewhat, is the forward cockpit. I will add no controls or dash. Any seat will be a seat only in the academic sense. VERY narrow, no padding, no safety harness, no windscreen, webbing installed for baggage, and a hard cover over the opening to facilitate my intended aesthetic work. I understand that this may impact resale value, but I am building this ship for my use and resale is not a consideration in the design. I think a split axle with springs is the way to go on gear, but I really like the wooden gear (love to put an painted airfoil over the axle). Because of where I will be operating, a steerable tailwheel is almost required. Brakes ARE required. However, I love the idea of a rudder bar, not to mention that this allows me to stick closer to the plans. The manual mentions a 'tailwheel control stick'. I interpret this as a separate control in the cockpit to manage ground handling. Does anyone herein have such a set-up? Penny for your thoughts. I don't mind getting really creative and 'out of the box' here. -------- Andy Garrett 'General Purpose Creative Dude' Haysville, Kansas Read this topic online here: <http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438616#438616> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438616#438616 http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List http://www.matronics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: steel
From: "Catdesigns" <Catdesigns(at)att.net>
Date: Feb 23, 2015
Steve Not all stainless steels are created equal. Just like not all carbon steels are equal. The choice to use a particular metal comes down to multiple factors, strength, workability, cost, availability. I would love to be using titanium for my plane but that just isn't cost effective (makes 4130 look cheap). 4130 has become popular because it posses a good combination of workability, cost, resistant to rust, and strength. Here is a good discussion. http://machinedesign.com/materials/comparing-stainless-steel-and-other-metals Chris -------- Chris Sacramento, CA WestCoastPiet.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438624#438624 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: New member and a few questions already
From: "Andy Garrett" <andy_garrett(at)live.com>
Date: Feb 23, 2015
That's a solid solution--thank you. What are the bars under your rudder bar? Are those gas pistons attached to you rudder system? -------- Andy Garrett 'General Purpose Creative Dude' Haysville, Kansas Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438627#438627 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Philips" <jack(at)bedfordlandings.com>
Subject: Re: New member and a few questions already
Date: Feb 23, 2015
Heel brakes and their master cylinders Jack Phillips NX899JP Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia -----Original Message----- From: owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Andy Garrett Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 4:45 PM Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: New member and a few questions already --> That's a solid solution--thank you. What are the bars under your rudder bar? Are those gas pistons attached to you rudder system? -------- Andy Garrett 'General Purpose Creative Dude' Haysville, Kansas Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438627#438627 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 23, 2015
Subject: welding sticker shock
From: Steven Dortch <steven.d.dortch(at)gmail.com>
I was looking to have two cracks in a thin piece of steel spot welded to stop the cracking. Went into a big welding shop and was first quoted "something over $100 per hour. at least one hour." I said no way and the desk person said "I will ask the boss." Then he came back and said $85. I thanked them (they were nice) and said I would keep them in mind. I am going to contact a motorcycle repair shop that I think will be much more reasonable. Perhaps part of the problem is the corner of San Antonio I am on. It is full of Oil field and semi truck repair shops. -- Blue Skies, Steve D ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 23, 2015
Subject: Re: New member and a few questions already
From: Steven Dortch <steven.d.dortch(at)gmail.com>
Andy, you said "Where I will still deviate somewhat, is the forward cockpit. I will add no controls or dash. Any seat will be a seat only in the academic sense. VERY narrow, no padding, no safety harness, no windscreen, webbing installed for baggage, and a hard cover over the opening to facilitate my intended aesthetic work. I understand that this may impact resale value, but I am building this ship for my use and resale is not a consideration in the design." Just a thought, Build a lightweight "Box" or tray that will hold your camping (It is an Air Camper) items up higher than the seat and make it go all the way up to the front tank. Then put good bungees in it to hold your stuff forward and put a good openable cover on it. Then you don't have to bend way down in the plane to get stuff out. Blue Skies, Steve "the good idea fairy" D On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Andy Garrett wrote: > andy_garrett(at)live.com> > > Thanks again gang! > > I mocked up a space on the floor last night to a 22" width. I think I can > live with it in general, but my specific concern is control manipulation > for the throttle and stick--not much elbow room for movement. Yet, I am > more confident with leaving this mod off of the list. Thanks for the sound > advice. > > Likewise, a wing tank augmented by a header tank will be plenty of fuel > for my purposes--sold. This allows me to build very close to the plans. > > Where I will still deviate somewhat, is the forward cockpit. I will add > no controls or dash. Any seat will be a seat only in the academic sense. > VERY narrow, no padding, no safety harness, no windscreen, webbing > installed for baggage, and a hard cover over the opening to facilitate my > intended aesthetic work. I understand that this may impact resale value, > but I am building this ship for my use and resale is not a consideration in > the design. > > I think a split axle with springs is the way to go on gear, but I really > like the wooden gear (love to put an painted airfoil over the axle). > > Because of where I will be operating, a steerable tailwheel is almost > required. Brakes ARE required. However, I love the idea of a rudder bar, > not to mention that this allows me to stick closer to the plans. The manual > mentions a 'tailwheel control stick'. I interpret this as a separate > control in the cockpit to manage ground handling. Does anyone herein have > such a set-up? Penny for your thoughts. I don't mind getting really > creative and 'out of the box' here. > > -------- > Andy Garrett > 'General Purpose Creative Dude' > Haysville, Kansas > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438616#438616 > > -- Blue Skies, Steve D ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Four-bladed prop
From: "bdewenter" <anonymouse(at)woh.rr.com>
Date: Feb 23, 2015
..."He's a four-blader Mary Beth!" -------- Bob 'Early Builder' Dewenter Dayton OH Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438631#438631 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 23, 2015
Subject: Re: Four-bladed prop
From: macz(at)peak.org
Dan-- That prop is awesome!--can't wait to hear how it works on the A. --Mac in Oregon > Hello Pieter's, > > > As you might remember about two years ago I carved this prop from white > ash, 44 pitch and 72" diameter. As it turned out it was too large and the > ole model A could only turn 1600 RPM and 220 lbs on the Official Pietenpol > List Fish Scale(s). I have now completed trimming each blade by 1-1/2" and > really thinning the blades also. It is now 69" diameter. I hope to test it > in the coming weeks. > > > Dan Helsper > Loensloe Airfield > Puryear, TN > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Four-bladed prop
From: "womenfly2" <Love2Fly.KAP(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 24, 2015
Solidity is simply the ratio of the total blade area of the propeller to the disk swept out when the prop turns. The blade area is roughly the length (called the radius) times the width (called the chord). More solidity = less efficiency. Generally speaking, the more blades, the less efficient the propeller...for cruise. Of course, a whole lot depends on the blade cross section, width, length, rotational speed, etc. So think of it like this: The blades of a propeller interact with each other, in a manner which decreases efficiency. If you think of the blades as wings, each blade will be operating in the downwash and disturbed wake from the preceding blades. More blades mean more interaction means less efficient. Four blades are fine but thin out the blade chord width like a Cub prop. WF2 -------- Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438645#438645 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Four-bladed prop
From: "dwilson" <marwilson(at)charter.net>
Date: Feb 24, 2015
I like it ! No, I really like it! Dan, you must be one of those experimental home builders. I can't wait until you start working on the contra rotating prop design. There is nothing like creating your own prop with a fine piece of wood ! Got to go, furnace is running in the shop. Dan Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438661#438661 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Four-bladed prop
From: "AircamperN11MS" <Scott.liefeld(at)lacity.org>
Date: Feb 24, 2015
Dan, What a beautiful looking prop. Have you weighed it. I would guess it weighs about 18 pounds. I like it. It should be fun and keep you on your toes when propping it. Cheers, -------- Scott Liefeld Flying N11MS since March 1972 Steel Tube C-85-12 Wire Wheels Brodhead in 1996 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438666#438666 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 24, 2015
Subject: Re: Four-bladed prop
From: Steven Dortch <steven.d.dortch(at)gmail.com>
theoretically the best is a single blade like the everel blade I would love to have/ make one of these. Blue Skies, Steve D On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:54 AM, womenfly2 wrote: > > Solidity is simply the ratio of the total blade area of the propeller to > the disk swept out when the prop turns. The blade area is roughly the > length (called the radius) times the width (called the chord). > > More solidity = less efficiency. > Generally speaking, the more blades, the less efficient the > propeller...for cruise. > Of course, a whole lot depends on the blade cross section, width, length, > rotational speed, etc. > > So think of it like this: The blades of a propeller interact with each > other, in a manner which decreases efficiency. If you think of the blades > as wings, each blade will be operating in the downwash and disturbed wake > from the preceding blades. More blades mean more interaction means less > efficient. > > Four blades are fine but thin out the blade chord width like a Cub prop. > > WF2 > > -------- > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=438645#438645 > > -- Blue Skies, Steve D ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-LME0)[Vantage Partners, LLC]" <michael.d.cuy(at)nasa.gov>
Subject: Andy-- storage space and fuel
Date: Feb 24, 2015
QW5keSwNCg0KV2VsY29tZSB0byB0aGUgbGlzdC4gIE15IHR3byBjZW50cyBvbiB5b3VyIGlkZWFz IG9mIGEgd2luZyB0YW5rIGFuZCBoZWFkZXIgdGFuay0tLW5vIG5lZWQgZm9yIGVpdGhlci4gICBT aW1wbHkgZmFicmljYXRlIGEgbGFyZ2Ugbm9zZSB0YW5rDQpmb3IgcmlnaHQgYmVoaW5kIHlvdXIg ZmlyZXdhbGwgYW5kIHlvdSB3aWxsIHJlYXAgdGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyBhZHZhbnRhZ2VzOg0KDQoN CjEpICAgICAgeW91ciB3aW5nIGNlbnRlciBzZWN0aW9uIGNhbiBiZSB1c2VkIGVudGlyZWx5IGZv ciBiYWdnYWdlLiAgIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cud2VzdGNvYXN0cGlldC5jb20vaW1hZ2VzL01pa2UlMjBD dXklMjBBLTY1JTIwUGlldC9taWtlX2N1eS5odG0NCg0KMikgICAgICB5b3XigJlsbCBuZXZlciBu ZWVkIGEgbGFkZGVyIHRvIGdldCB1cCB0byBmdWVsIHlvdXIgY2VudGVyIHNlY3Rpb24gdGFuay4N Cg0KMykgICAgICB5b3XigJlsbCBuZXZlciBzcGlsbCBmdWVsIGZyb20gZmlsbGluZyB5b3VyIHdp bmcgdGFuayBpbnRvIHlvdXIgY29ja3BpdA0KDQo0KSAgICAgIHlvdeKAmWxsIGhhdmUgYWJvdXQg MiBob3Vycywgd2l0aCBnZW5lcm91cyByZXNlcnZlcyB3aXRoIGEgbGFyZ2Ugbm9zZSB0YW5rLg0K DQo1KSAgICAgIE15IG5vc2UgdGFuayBpcyAxNyBnYWxsb25zIGFuZCBJIGhhdmUgZmxvd24gMiBo b3VyIDMwIG1pbnV0ZSBsZWdzIHdoaWNoIGhpcyByaWRpY3Vsb3VzIGJ1dCBpdCBjYW4gYmUgZG9u ZS4NCg0KNikgICAgICB5b3XigJlsbCBlbGltaW5hdGUgZXh0cmEgZnVlbCBsaW5lcywgc2h1dG9m ZiB2YWx2ZXMsIGZpdHRpbmdzLCBhbmQgd2VpZ2h0Lg0KDQo3KSAgICAgIHlvdSB3aWxsIGJlIGFi bGUgdG8gZmlsbCB5b3VyIHRhbmsgc3RhbmRpbmcgb24gdGhlIGdyb3VuZCwgd2l0aG91dCBhIGxh ZGRlciBpZiBuZWNlc3Nhcnkgb3IgZnJvbSBmdWVsIGNhbnMgb2YgeW91ciBjaG9pY2UuDQoNCg0K QXMgb3RoZXJzIGhhdmUgbWVudGlvbmVkLCB5b3UgY2FuIHN0aWxsIGluc3RhbGwgYSBzcGFydGFu


February 03, 2015 - February 24, 2015

Pietenpol-Archive.digest.vol-oa