RV-Archive.digest.vol-ao

July 25, 1995 - August 14, 1995



      Central 
           Machinery) compare to Delta and Sears?  Those seem to be the other 
      
           brands in my price range.
           
           I 13" enough?  That means only 6/5" to the center of the hole from 
      the 
           edge of the piece.  I'm guessing the only time this comes in to 
      play 
           is on the instrument panel.  I could be terribly wrong since I'm 
      only 
           on the Horiz. stab.
           
           Next step up is the 1hp, but it's $280.  ($300 at Sears)
           
           thanks,
           
           
                 ,---.____________________         __         ______        :
                /'                          \     /  \     _-\  O   \______ : 
      
               | Russ Nichols                >---/    `---^   `-----'      
      |:>
               | russ_nichols(at)fire.ca.gov   /    |=====                  _- :
               | RV-6 empenage             /    ( `---,-----==========--'   :
               |  ,---.___________________/    (_    O    __)      ___/      
               |/'                               (_______)        <___)
             
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 25, 1995
rv-list(at)matronics.com
From: ammeterj(at)ammeterj.seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re: c/s props
The crankshaft has to be hollow. ALSO, there has to be a hole drilled through the front part of the crank for the oil to reach the inside of the crank. Don't make the same mistake I did. My engine, O-320 E2A, should have the proper crank for conversion to a C/S prop. I even called the Lycoming gurus to verify that. After purchasing a C/S prop, governor, spinner, controls, etc, I knocked out the plug in the front of the crank. The crank was hollow but it had not been drilled cross wise. There should have been a pipe/tube at a 90 degree angle to the crank in the middle of the crankshaft. NOTHING!!!! After saying a few appropriate comments I sat down and whimpered a lot. To make a long story short, I found that the original owner (and A & P) when doing a major overhaul on the engine replaced the crankshaft. He used the wrong crankshaft for the engine. When I contacted him to discuss his error and what it cost me his comment was "what do you expect me to do?" When I said he could buy me a new crank he only laughed. So---- what's the moral of this story? Don't assume that a hollow crankshaft is enough. Make sure you can use a C/S prop if that is what you really want. Check out that crank!!!! >DPE (AKA gr8av8or) wrote: > > >> The engine has a lot to do with your decision of the CS prop or not. You >> didn't mention if you had already picked out the AC ENG of not. If you find >> the eng already set up with the hollow crank and gov., then maybe you are in >> business. > >Does the engine have to have a hollow crank to work with C/S? > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 25, 1995
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: Re: Fwd: Fuel tank Advice needed
> Be sure to machine countersink the > skins where they join the back baffle. My plans were cut off at the > top and I dimpled. Caused me much grief. My tanks have passed the > soap suds/air test. > > Ross Mickey I machine c-sunk the baffle to skin holes per the plans on my left tank, but subsequently talked to several people who had either mistakenly or intentionally dimpled theirs and said it came out ok, so on my right tank I dimpled them. I had to be extra careful drilling the holes so they wouldn't come out too close to the doubler or baffle web, and it came out fine. I'm glad I did it that way, for strength, sealing, and consistency. I wish I'd done the left tank that way. What part of it caused you grief Ross? Randall Henderson RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 25, 1995
From: ammeterj(at)ammeterj.seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re: Tail Wagging...
Stop the tail wagging??!! Would you cut out a dogs barker? The RV wags its tail because it's HAPPY!! > > I was talking with a friend of mine who has a hanger mate with an > RV-6. He said he has a few hours in the bird and does notice a little > tail wagging action. He was suggested the aircraft could us a little > more tail area back there. Does any one know if the RV-6T with it's > bigger tail section has overcome the wagging phenomenon? > > Chris. > RV-6 #21390 > San Jose CA > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 25, 1995
rv-list(at)matronics.com
From: ammeterj(at)ammeterj.seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re:
That drill press sounds fine; I built my RV-6 using a table model drill press. There's only 4 1/8" clearance between the drill bit and the post. Since the ribs now come with the lightening holes drilled/punched already you shouldn't have any need for more than that. The instrument panel holes should be cut out with a knockout punch. You can purchase a punch and a template for less than $100.00. That sounds like a lot but when you see your completed panel you'll appreciate it. The cost of the table model is less than $100.00; save the extra money for instruments. fire.ca.gov!RUSS_NICHOLS_at_SAC__DATA__PROCESSING(at)matronics.com wrote: >>From RUSS_NICHOLS_at_SAC__DATA__PROCESSING Tue Jul 25 08:49:54 0700 1995 remote from fire.ca.gov >Received: from ccMail by ccgate.fire.ca.gov >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Date: Tue, 25 Jul 1995 08:49:54 -0700 >Message-ID: <01512100(at)fire.ca.gov> >From: RUSS_NICHOLS_at_SAC__DATA__PROCESSING(at)fire.ca.gov (RUSS NICHOLS) >Subject: drill press questions >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >Content-Description: cc:Mail note part >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII >Content-Length: 1612 > > > It's time for me to buy my own drill press. I starting to feel guilty > about knocking on my neighbor's door with airplane pieces in my > hands... > > Harbor Freight has a 13", 3/4 hp, floor-standing press for $159 (on > sale). It looks like a pretty good deal. The only thing I could see > that I didn't like was the method for changing the speed. It doesn't > have a handle to move the motor in and out for tension. You just push > and pull on the motor itself (it does have a small spring to assist > you). > > How does the quality of Harbor's stuff (brand name on it is Central > Machinery) compare to Delta and Sears? Those seem to be the other > brands in my price range. > > I 13" enough? That means only 6/5" to the center of the hole from the > edge of the piece. I'm guessing the only time this comes in to play > is on the instrument panel. I could be terribly wrong since I'm only > on the Horiz. stab. > > Next step up is the 1hp, but it's $280. ($300 at Sears) > > thanks, > > > ,---.____________________ __ ______ : > /' \ / \ _-\ O \______ : > | Russ Nichols >---/ `---^ `-----' |:> > | russ_nichols(at)fire.ca.gov / |===== _- : > | RV-6 empenage / ( `---,-----==========--' : > | ,---.___________________/ (_ O __) ___/ > |/' (_______) <___) > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 25, 1995
From: Don Wentz <Don_Wentz(at)ccm2.hf.intel.com>
Subject: Re: RV-6T
Herman, you're actually confusing the -6B with the -6T. The -6T was the prototype for several changes made for the Nigerian Airforce trainer, of which a factory (not affiliated with Van's) is building 100 or so in Nigeria. I saw a photo of 31 completed "Air Beetles" as they are called parked in a triangular formation on a ramp. Impressive!!! They are tri-gear, taller canopy to accomodate military helmets, larger/counterweighted VS/rudder, different gear, 180hp c/s. There may be other minor changes, not sure. The RV-6B is what you described below - basically a test of some different ways to do some things, some of which worked, some didn't. BTW, the RV-6T is Red with yellow stripe, the RV-6B is yellow with red stripe, 160hp, Sensenich fixed metal prop. The Duck, N790DW, 180HP RV-6, #20369 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From what I recall, the 6T was indeed to be able to build a certified aircraft under the new light plane rules. I heard Van talk about it a Oshkosh last yr and I think he described in in the newsletter also. It is a 6A with some mods. The landing gear is flat spring gear (not tubular steel) like on older Cessnas. This was done to be more repairable in the field. The tail was also different. I think the HS is a simple rectangle (to be easier to build). I heard on this net the VS is also larger. He did not want anyone reading much into the 6T except he is experimenting at making things easier to build and maintain (for flight schools, etc). > > > > At a recent EAA meeting, Van described the -6T as a prototype for a primary trainer intended for a south american military (If I recall correctly). > > > Mike Graves > > RV-6A in box on closet shelf > Herman Dierks, Dept. E54S, AWSD Austin, Texas mail: dierks(at)austin.ibm.com VM: DIERKS at AUSVM6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: RV-6T
Date: Jul 25, 1995
From: "Kevin E. Vap" <kvap(at)solar.sky.net>
-- [ From: Kevin E. Vap * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] -- Terry wrote: > > There have been a couple of posts of the last day or two referring to the > RV-6T...how does this compare to the RV-6? Is there is significant difference > that I should be concerned about? Thanx for your help... > As Mike said, it is a special version for foreign military. Differences include larger tail, taller canopy (for helmets). I'm not sure what else, but I'm sure Randall and Don and others could fill in more details. It is also the main tri-cycle gear demo plane they use for shows & etc. - Kevin Vap kvap@sky.net http://www.sky.net/~kvap ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 25, 1995
From: gtyler(at)southwind.net (Greg Tyler)
Subject: Who we are.
I am Greg Tyler, from Derby, Kansas - near the "Air Capital of the World" (Wichita) and have plans to build a RV-6. (I have finally convinced my wife that this is really going to happen! :^) I will be leaving for Oshkosh on Friday morning - taking the low route - in a friends van. Unfortunately, we will be staying with the Q-2 bunch. I am hoping to meet some of the other rv-lister's if Sat. @ 2:00 near the RV-6T is still good? I am currently working on building a tool collection. I have a slight advantage since Boeing surplus sales is nearby. (new and some experienced Clecos for .25 ea!) I still havn't ordered my tail kit but hope to soon. Greg Tyler gtyler(at)southwind.net Greg Tyler gtyler(at)southwind.net RV-6 S/N 23685 Derby, KS ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 1995
From: "Terence C. Gannon" <74267.3003(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: Who Are We Anyway?
Dear RV-Listers -- I'm delighted (and excited) to report that my Preview Plans and Construction Manual showed today, and I now have my official Van's S/N (noted below). It's the first basic step, but somehow, I feel, I'm underway! Something that all you polite 'Listers forgot to mention...IT LOOKS PRETTY DARNED COMPLICATED FOR GOSH SAKES! :-) :-) Seriously, though, it's a little overwhelming, but I'm looking forward to ripping into this stuff, at which point I'm sure it'll all start to make sense. I'm sure I'll have lots of questions for you folks, and I thank you all again, for your help. To answer John Ammeter's question of a little while back, here's my data; Name: Terry Gannon Spouse: Michelle (no children) Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada (CYYC and CYBW) Email: Compuserve 74267,3003 or Internet 74267.3003(at)compuserve.com Occupation: Team Leader, Information Services, Sceptre Resources Limited RV-6: Preview Plans, S/N 24414. Hopefully attending the Builder's Course in September, kit purchase at the same time. Flying Exp: I currently have my Private License, and about 80 hrs. Other: Building is something that I have dreamed about since I was about fifteen, which is getting on for 20 years now. My inspiration at that time was Peter Garrison's Melmoth (sp?), particularly after it flew the Atlantic (whatever happened to it?). Current interest inspired by the remarkable determination of Delmar Benjamin in building the GeeBee. His work is a testament to what's possible if you REALLY believe in something. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JIMNJAC(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 25, 1995
Subject: Fwd: WHO ARE WE [1]
jim and jackie eastburn (jimnjac) hillsboro or. (two miles north of van's) rv-4 tail section under const. firefighter (i get to drive the fire engine) wife, paramedic --------------------- From: aol.com!JerryFlyRV(at)matronics.com Date: 95-07-23 23:47:38 EDT Jerry Springer Hillsboro, OR ( 6 mi from Van's) RV-6 s/n 20241 N906GS Third customer built RV-6 to fly Tip-up, Elec flaps, Elec trim, Vac Gyros, Navaid autopilot, Rocky MTN. Encoder O-360 A4A,Warnke Prop First Flight July 14, 1989 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6junkie(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 26, 1995
Subject: The Easy Way To Pro-Seal
OK...here it is...the easy and clean way to pro-seal your tanks (and the hinges on the cowling and the firewall to the fuselage skins)! First. DON'T USE PRO-SEAL. What? How can this be? Simple. Pro Seal is a just a generic term that we RV-ers use for Class A and Class B, two part polysulfide based Aircraft Fuel Tank Sealant. The product that I recommend (used on many RV's so far) is a product made by CHEMSEAL and distributed by SEAL PACK. The difference between pro-seal and the Seal Pack product is how it is mixed and applied. The Seal-Pack product comes in 2 1/2 or 6 oz tubes and is mixed IN THE TUBE! It is than applied to the ribs using a caulking gun straight from the tube. No measuring, mixing with sticks or mess. The product you want is known as CS3204. There is a sub-number used for the work-life time. Example: CS3204-B2 has a working time of 2 hours. B1/2 is half an hour. The B2 is the best way to go in that is gives you ample work time. Don't order the stuff until you need it because it has a self life of 6 to 9 months. Second. Ware multiple pairs of VINYL Gloves. The latex type have a powder on them that will get into the sealant. Very Bad. As your gloves get gooped-up, remove one layer to expose a clean pair. Neat and Clean. Third. Don't use MEK! Use Dupont Gun and Equipment Cleaner (I forget the number off- hand). Cleans great and isn't as toxic as MEK. Forth. If you want to make sure that your tanks don't leak...slosh 'em. Once again, Seal Pack has a product that is AVFUEL/AUTOFUEL Safe....CS3600. Comes in quart cans. Last. Don't use a permanent sealant on those things that you might need to remove like access covers and fuel sending units. Order a low adhesive like CS3300B1/2. Seals well but can be removed (with some effort). Seal Pack can be reached at (316) 942-6211; Wichita Kansas. The people there a very helpful and knowledgeable and will send out (or fax) tech info if you ask. Prices are about $15 for 6 oz and $12 for 2 1/2 oz. You will need 4 ea. of the 6 oz CS3204B2, 2 ea. of the 2 1/2 oz, 1 ea. of the 2 1/2 oz. CS3300B2 and two quarts of the CS3600 to finish two wing tanks. Use two of the 6 oz for each main tank and one 2 1/2 oz for the rear baffle. Wait to due the rear baffle until the main tanks set-up and apply the slosh right to the ribs. After the rear baffle is attached, slosh the entire tank. There will be NO drainage. Trust me! It isn't the cheapest way to go but you will have a sealant that is mixed correctly and will produce the best results with the least amount of clean-up. Good luck Gary Corde RV-6 N211GC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CRazer2(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 26, 1995
Subject: Re: Additional Questions
Just finished my tail. Countersink, its easier, get the best one from CAT3Tools, it's worth the extra $. Set the countersink slightly (very) below the skin surface, when the rivet is set it will expand slightly and produce a flush and usually perfect fit. Deburr every hole on both sides when dimpling, countersinking will cut the crumbs away. Even a small crumb of aluminum can cause a loose fit. Probably won't amount to a hill of beans but some night at 10k feet over the Rocky Mountains you'll remember every one of the imperfections and unburred holes. As far as the pop rivets, get Orndorferes video, he explains how to easily complete the entire HS w/o pops. I did it first time with no probs. just don't try to place any rivet on the extreme nose end of the center ribs. Finally, if you watch the video, it doesn't really matter which side you do first. good luck ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 1995
From: Don Wentz <Don_Wentz(at)ccm2.hf.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Drill Press
Russ, I have the table-top version of one from H-F. Obviously it is NOT machine shop quality, but has been totally adequate. Changing speeds is not that bad. The reach was OK for most things. The Duck, N790DW, 180HP RV-6, #20369 >Harbor Freight has a 13", 3/4 hp, floor-standing press for $159 (on >sale). It looks like a pretty good deal. The only thing I could see >that I didn't like was the method for changing the speed. It doesn't >have a handle to move the motor in and out for tension. You just push >and pull on the motor itself (it does have a small spring to assist >you). >How does the quality of Harbor's stuff (brand name on it is Central >Machinery) compare to Delta and Sears? Those seem to be the other >brands in my price range. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 1995
From: rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com (Ross Mickey )
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Fuel tank Advice needed
Subject: Re: Fwd: Fuel tank Advice needed When I prosealed, the dimple countersinking has more curves, ie more places that need to line up right in order to get a good tight fit. I had leaks through the back baffle which I could only correct by cutting 5" holes at the bottom of each bay (on the baffle) applying proseal to the inside seams and then sealing the holes. This was shown in a past RVator for solving a slosh problem. The process sounds horrendous, but after I bit the bullet and stopped fretting, it went pretty well. At least my tanks don't leak!! Ross Mickey > Be sure to machine countersink the > skins where they join the back baffle. My plans were cut off at the > top and I dimpled. Caused me much grief. My tanks have passed the > soap suds/air test. > > Ross Mickey I machine c-sunk the baffle to skin holes per the plans on my left tank, but subsequently talked to several people who had either mistakenly or intentionally dimpled theirs and said it came out ok, so on my right tank I dimpled them. I had to be extra careful drilling the holes so they wouldn't come out too close to the doubler or baffle web, and it came out fine. I'm glad I did it that way, for strength, sealing, and consistency. I wish I'd done the left tank that way. What part of it caused you grief Ross? Randall Henderson RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 1995
From: "MIKE PILLA" <mpilla(at)ccsmtplink.espinc.com>
Subject: Re: Who Are We Anyway?
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Who Are We Anyway? InternetLink Date: 7/26/95 1:18 AM ----- snip ----- My inspiration at that time was Peter Garrison's Melmoth (sp?), particularly after it flew the Atlantic (whatever happened to it?). Unfortunately, Peter's bird was destroyed several years ago; Peter was OK. He was waiting to depart a runway (forget where) when a landing plane "plopped" down on his bird. Totaled, sigh! I haven't followed his new plane design nor progress for quite some time; hopefully someone else can provide an update. Mike Pilla pilla(at)espinc.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 1995
From: JIM SCHMIDT <JIM.SCHMIDT(at)mail.mei.com>
Subject: Pro-Sealing isn't so bad -Reply
Dave Did Scott put pro-seal on the skin also? Did you put the Pro-seal over the rivet heads after bucking? >>> David A. Barnhart 07/24/95 02:15pm >>> I am writing this after just completing the pro-sealing of the inner ribs in my left fuel tank. It was NOT the horrible task that a lot of people make it out to be. Of course, I had excellent help and guidance. Scott McDaniels of Arizona Aerocrafters has built several RV's, and quite a few tanks. His own RV-6A won awards at Copperstate a few years ago when he entered it. Far a small fee, Scott basically allowed me to help him while he sealed my tank ribs. Because the job turned out to be a piece of cake, I thought I would describe a few important things I learned today from Scott. The cradle: Scott's cradle does not have a base. It is simply two upgrights, each with a leading-edge-shaped cutout. Each upright is clamped to a very low sawhorse. The top of each sawhorse is only about 24 inches high. This allows the rivet bucker to stand and easility buck the rivets. The riveter can comfortably sit in a chair and drive the rivets. And with no crosspiece or base to get in the way, driving those frontmost few rivets was not a problem. Scott used the rivet gun and I used the bucking bar. Pro-Seal: Scott uses only TWO TABLESPOONS of pro-seal per rib. This was more than enough, and he mixed up only enough at one time to do a single rib. The pro-seal was applied to the rib flange with a popsicle stick, and a cross-section of the rib flange and pro-seal looks like: ----------- / \ <-------Pro-seal / \ ----------------- <-- rib flange | | |Rib Web | By the way, we applied no pro-seal to the nose section of the inner ribs because there are no rivets there anyway. While I held the skin apart, Scott inserted the rib into the tank. That way none of the pro-seal would get scraped off during the insertion process. When we did this, we had ALL the ribs clecoed in the tank. We simply removed one rib at a time, pro-sealed and riveted it, and went on to the next one. Riveting: Scott riveted, I bucked. Yawn. Yes, we used latex gloves, but not many. Yes, we used MEK, but not much. Guys, this was easy. The two key elemments were the cradle (low and with to base) and using just enough pro-seal to do the job. Best Regards, Dave Barnhart rv-6 sn 23744 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 1995
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: Re: C.S. Props.
> Van's RV-6 manual list pro's and con's for Constant Speed vs Fixed > pitch props. The following info is some of my opinions and also were > expressed by Alan Tolle in a talk he gave at an EAA chapter 92 > meeting. > [Good discussion of the relative merits of CS vs Wood props deleted] > > Gary I had planned on a CS prop all along, and the Sun-n-Fun trip with Van's crew really reaffirmed that. The trip out was with Bill Benedict in the 180hp/CS prop equipped RV-6T, and I returned with Andy Hanna in the 160hp/fixed pitch Sensenich (metal) prop equipped RV-6B. Granted, they are different airplanes, and the RV-6T has 20 more HP, but I think a large portion of the extra performance and utility in the RV-6T can be attributed to the prop. I had always figured a CS prop would be "nice to have" so you can get off the ground faster and climb out steeper, and still have good cruise. But what I didn't realize was just how much extra utility it gives you in several other flight regimes. When climbing up at altitude for example, the Red RV-6T seemed to effortlessly drift up through a hole in the clouds, while the yellow RV-6B seemed to be clawing for altitude by comparison, and was heating up pretty good as well. Going DOWN it was a BIG help -- dropping through a hole in the clouds was a piece of cake in the RV-6T, just push the nose down and pull the power and the prop flattens out and acts like a big speed brake. Doing a similar maneuver in the RV-6T you'd wind up too much speed, and we instead had to set up as if for landing, dragging it on the prop till we got to the hole, and then pull the power, drop the flaps, and sink on through (it was a pretty small hole). Same thing goes for slowing down in the pattern -- much easier with a CS prop, and again you can take advantage of the "speed brake" effect and drop it in at a higher sink rate. CS props are also very nice when doing aerobatics -- you don't have to worry about overspeeding the engine when you drop into a dive. Other than the initial cost, the only problem I see with a CS prop, especially in my early days of wringing out the airplane, is the REPLACEMENT COST. It's one thing to have to make that one-time investment, but I'd really hate doing it a second time if I dinged it. Also if you get a prop strike with a metal vs wood prop you're a lot more likely to damage the engine. I guess I'll just have to not ding it! Randall Henderson RV-6 Randall Henderson RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 1995
From: carl(at)drcpdx.stt3.com
Subject: drill press questions
Russ - I bought a drill press from Harbor Freight similar to the one you are contemplating (3/4 hp, bench mount, 16 speeds, 14" reach I think). The quality is not as good as a Sears or Delta, etc. It is made in China. On the bolts that attach the tower to the base the bolt threads were very loose in the threads in the base (I bought some longer bolts and puts nuts on the bottom side of the base). The motor pulley was not in line with the idler and spindle pulleys and I had to reposition it to prevent belt twisting. General movement does not feel as smooth as the other brands. Otherwise it seems to run true with no problems. Note you do need a drill press that turns as slow as possible, certainly less that 500 rpm. Most of the other lower priced drill presses have a slow speed of about 600 rpm. The Harbor Freight press is satisfactory for building an RV but if you want a nice tool you can use for years to come, spend more and get a better one; I wish I had. Carl Weston RV-6 23876 on empennage control surfaces wing kit on order ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 1995
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: news group
I was just looking over my old mail and realized I hadn't responded to this yet. In case you haven't figured it out yet, just go to "news:rec.aviation.homebuilt". Randall > I have seen several references to rec.aviation.homebuilt. Do you know > how to get there using netscape? > > Jerald > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 1995
From: Don Wentz <Don_Wentz(at)ccm2.hf.intel.com>
Subject: 3-bladed props
I test-flew Matt Dralle's 3-blade Catto prop (for his unfinished RV-4) last summer in Livermore. It sounded 'funny' compared to my 2 blade Warnke, but that is just because I am used to the sound of mine. People on the outside said it was quieter. My prop is a cruise prop with not very good climb performance. Matt's prop climbed much better and was about 5mph faster at the top end. However, it is likely that it would either cruise much slower or at much higher fuel burn, as it turned 2850 rpm flat out compared to mine at 2550. I have 180hp and a local Long Easy running a 170hp 320 with a similar 3-blade Catto prop was shocked that we were about even on top speed. I guess you can make your own conclusions: If performance means more than economy, then Matt's prop worked well. As a side note, I have never been satisfied with the climb performance of my prop (73L x 72p). It is a great cruiser, I usually cruise at 2450 and burn less fuel than 0-320 equipped RVs. But I want more pull so I sent it back for Bernie to take 1" of pitch out. It climbs better and I can get almost 2650 flat-out, but I want more, so last night Doug Miner helped me take 1" off the length. We think this will increase rpm almost 100. I'll let you know what happens. My RV-6 was built for a c/s prop, but I got tired of spending $$ and didn't get one. I expect that eventually I will make the change, but am fine with the wood for now. BTW, the prop summary that Gary did was very good, although there are some who will argue the fuel burn subject, and the importance of lighter weight is a big deal to some flyers. The Duck, N790DW, 180HP RV-6, #20369 >Gary's is the first (that I recall) running a 3-bladed prop. Any one else? >- Alan >On Tue, 25 Jul 1995 aol.com!RV6junkie(at)matronics.com wrote: > remember. It is powered by a 160hp Lycoming turning a Performance 3-bladed > prop. I had the prop on a friends RV-4 and it was great....can't wait to fly > it on my -6. | Alan Reichert - Wannabe RV-6 Builder | | Preview plans received! #24179 | | Study...study...look for tools...study.... | |---------------------------------------------| | http://www.clark.net/pub/reichera/home.html | ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 1995
From: Don Wentz <Don_Wentz(at)ccm2.hf.intel.com>
Subject: Re[2]: Fwd: Fuel tank Advice needed
I dimpled mine and had no problem in assembly and now 200hrs without leaks... The Duck, N790DW, 180HP RV-6, #20369 >When I prosealed, the dimple countersinking has more curves, ie more >places that need to line up right in order to get a good tight fit. I >had leaks through the back baffle which I could only correct by cutting >5" holes at the bottom of each bay (on the baffle) applying proseal to >the inside seams and then sealing the holes. This was shown in a past >RVator for solving a slosh problem. The process sounds horrendous, but >after I bit the bullet and stopped fretting, it went pretty well. At >least my tanks don't leak!! >Ross Mickey > Be sure to machine countersink the > skins where they join the back baffle. My plans were cut off at the > top and I dimpled. Caused me much grief. My tanks have passed the > soap suds/air test. > > Ross Mickey I machine c-sunk the baffle to skin holes per the plans on my left tank, but subsequently talked to several people who had either mistakenly or intentionally dimpled theirs and said it came out ok, so on my right tank I dimpled them. I had to be extra careful drilling the holes so they wouldn't come out too close to the doubler or baffle web, and it came out fine. I'm glad I did it that way, for strength, sealing, and consistency. I wish I'd done the left tank that way. What part of it caused you grief Ross? Randall Henderson RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Graves <mgraves(at)ptdcs2.intel.com>
Subject: c/s props
Date: Jul 26, 1995
Guys, Thank you Randall and others for the info on c/s props. It seems that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. I will look into it furthers to see if it is a viable option for me. Mike Graves RV-6A in box on closet shelf ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 1995
From: rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com (Ross Mickey )
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: C.S. Props.
For a more esoteric (I'll have to read it a few more times to really get it!!) Se the September 1995 issue of Kitplanes page 56 an article called "Is there life after oversquare" by Chuck Berthe. It discusses running at low rpm and high manifold pressure. Weird but true. If it's good enough for Charles Linbergh....... Ross Mickey 6-A Firewall > Van's RV-6 manual list pro's and con's for Constant Speed vs Fixed > pitch props. The following info is some of my opinions and also were > expressed by Alan Tolle in a talk he gave at an EAA chapter 92 > meeting. > [Good discussion of the relative merits of CS vs Wood props deleted] > > Gary (Another good dicussion fron Randall Henderson deleted) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Graves <mgraves(at)ptdcs2.intel.com>
Subject: fuel economy
Date: Jul 26, 1995
> Don Wentz wrote: > My prop is a cruise prop with not very good climb performance. Matt's prop > climbed much better and was about 5mph faster at the top end. However, it is > likely that it would either cruise much slower or at much higher fuel burn. This is a very educational channel and I'm learning a lot here. I have a question about fuel burn vs. prop pitch: Is it safe to say that with a given power setting, the fuel burn rate would decrease as the prop pitch becomes more severe and RPM drops? Thanks :-) Mike Graves RV-6A in box on closet shelf ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 1995
From: "A. Reichert" <reichera(at)clark.net>
Subject: RV in a BOX (Chatter)
I want to know what compression program you used to get this thing to fit in your closet! :-) On Wed, 26 Jul 1995, Michael Graves wrote: > > RV-6A in box on closet shelf > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 1995
From: Don Wentz <Don_Wentz(at)ccm2.hf.intel.com>
Subject: Re: fuel economy
I don't know, but I'd like to see that article that Ross mentioned, it seems to relate to how my prop ran before I started changing it. >See the September 1995 issue of Kitplanes page 56 an article called "Is there >life after oversquare" by Chuck Berthe. It discusses running at low rpm and >high manifold pressure. Is that available anywhere on the web/net? The Duck, N790DW, 180HP RV-6, #20369 >>Don Wentz wrote: >> My prop is a cruise prop with not very good climb performance. Matt's >>prop climbed much better and was about 5mph faster at the top end. >>However, it is >> likely that it would either cruise much slower or at much higher fuel burn. >This is a very educational channel and I'm learning a lot here. I >have a question about fuel burn vs. prop pitch: >Is it safe to say that with a given power setting, the fuel burn rate >would decrease as the prop pitch becomes more severe and RPM drops? >Thanks :-) >Mike Graves ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 1995
From: gtyler(at)southwind.net (Greg Tyler)
Subject: Who we are.
My name is Greg Tyler, from Derby, Kansas - near the "Air Capital of the World" (Wichita) and have plans to build a RV-6. I am married with one little boy (2) and one on the way. (I have finally convinced my wife that this airplane is really going to happen! :^) I am leaving for Oshkosh on Friday morning - taking the low route - in a friends van. Unfortunately, we will be staying with the Q-2 bunch. I am hoping to meet some of the other rv-lister's if Sat. @ 2:00 near the RV-6T is still good? I am currently working on building a tool collection. I found a local source with new and some experienced Clecos for .25 ea! I still havn't ordered my tail kit but hope to soon. I do have the plans however. (S/N 23685) I can't wait to get started. I have enjoyed the C/S vs. Fixed pitch discussion. I still haven't made up my mind. I guess that I have a little while yet. Greg Tyler gtyler(at)southwind.net RV-6 S/N 23685 Derby, KS ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JIMNJAC(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 27, 1995
Subject: tena mimi coupe
hey jerry! while looking through a 1973 copy of sport aviation, i found this half page ad of you endorsing the chris tena aircraft "mini coupe". no doubt this is where you got all of your money to build your -6. you look soooo cool in your crash helmet. reminds me of one of those little radio control pilots!! and the complete kit price less engine, motor mounts and cowling...$1695.00 jimnjac hillsboro, or. rv-4 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 1995
From: donmack(at)interaccess.com (Don Mack)
Subject: RV Plans
FYI, While going through the last few Van's newsletters, I relized I had been ignoring doing the plan updates due lack of time (or any other lame excuse). I asked Vans for a list of what plans are shipped with what kits so that I can skip the updates for plans that I will get in the future. This is what they replied for the RV-6a. >The plans numbers are as follows: >WING 10,11a,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19a,20,21 > >FUSELAGE 22 THRU 44, 46,47,48,49,52,59,SC-1,SC-2,SC-3,SC-4 > >FINISH 45,50,51,58,61,62 > It did not include the emp. kit which I assume are plans 1-9 (have not pulled them out to double check). thought it might help don mack rv-6a working on wings. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JerryFlyRV(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 27, 1995
Subject: Navaid Device Autopilot
After almost 700 hrs of flying my RV-6 I installed a Navaid Autopilot/Turn Cordinator. I installed the servo under the passenger seat and run the torque tube across and attached to the pilot control stick. You do have to cut one of the seat ribs to make room for the servo and then rivet some angles to the rib for stiffness and make some brace's to stiffen up the servo area. I have it hooked up to my Flybuddy GPS, I flew a 200 mile trip with it on Wed. to see how it was going to work and it works GREAT, I took off from Hillsboro,OR and climbed to 10.500ft trimmed for level flight and never touched the stick again other than to make small pitch trim adjustments.(my electric elevator trim control is on the stick) till I got ready to land at Medford,OR. You could take a nap ,read the paper or whatever (but you wouldn't because you are looking for other airplanes right?) and still get to your destinatiion without getting lost. I love it along with my new stereo PM200 intercom hooked up to a walkman type player. Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JerryFlyRV(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 27, 1995
Subject: Re: tena mimi coupe
>hey jerry! >while looking through a 1973 copy of sport aviation, i found this half page >ad of you endorsing the chris tena aircraft "mini coupe". no doubt this is >where you got all of your money to build your -6. you look soooo cool in your >crash helmet. reminds me of one of those little radio control pilots!! and >the complete kit price less engine, motor mounts and cowling...$1695.00 > >jimnjac hillsboro, or. rv-4 ....and I could not believe it when they raised the price to $1695.00, when I bought my kit it was $695.00 I had about $1700.00 in the airplane when I started flying it....wow. This was about the same time Van was flying the prototype RV-3, it used to really aggravate me when I was flying along at 95mph and he would come by me and do loops around me. Jerry Springer First customer built MINI COUPE first flight November 1971 N71GS Third customer built RV-6 first flight July 14, 1989 N906GS ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Graves <mgraves(at)ptdcs2.intel.com>
Subject: RV in a BOX (Chatter)
Date: Jul 27, 1995
A. Reichert wrote: > I want to know what compression program you used to get this > thing to fit in your closet! :-) > > On Wed, 26 Jul 1995, Michael Graves wrote: > > > > > RV-6A in box on closet shelf > > > Well, I have the paper version of th -6A. I did this for two reasons: a) it is substantially cheaper, only $250 minus engine, prop, avionics. b) Paper is much lighter than aluminum which will make one heck of a fast climb performance I do have some serious concerns about this though: a) I am worried about noxious chemicals such as elmer's glue. b) What are the g-load limits of a paper spar? c) Can I fly in the rain? I am experimenting with a folding fuselage design :-)) Mike Graves RV-6A *STILL* in box on closet shelf ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 27, 1995
From: Don Wentz <Don_Wentz(at)ccm2.hf.intel.com>
Subject: Possible accomodations for Homecoming
Gang, there is a new bed n breakfast being completed adjacent to the Scappoose Airport (where my RV-6 is based), about 10 minutes by RV from Van's. They assure me that there will be some rooms available by the homecoming. It's called "The Barnstormer", and will have an aviation theme. One of the owners, "Hap", has a real slick Starduster with a Ranger engine on it. If you want to check with them, call: Christine Cave 53758 West Lane Road Scappoose, OR 97056 503-543-2740 The Duck, N790DW, 180HP RV-6, #20369 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 27, 1995
From: JIM SCHMIDT <JIM.SCHMIDT(at)mail.mei.com>
Subject: Courtaulds Phone #
I ran out of the proseal I bought from Van and and A & P friend of mine offered me some 1422r that he says replaces the 890 that Van sells. The accelerator is black and looks the same but the base is orange not white. It is B2 which is the same cure time. Does any body know where to get technical info from Courtaulds. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 27, 1995
From: "A. Reichert" <reichera(at)clark.net>
Subject: Re: RV in a BOX (Chatter)
On Thu, 27 Jul 1995, Michael Graves wrote: > Well, I have the paper version of th -6A. I did this for two reasons: > > a) it is substantially cheaper, only $250 minus engine, prop, avionics. Of course. The REALLY expensive stuff is left out... > b) Paper is much lighter than aluminum which will make one heck of a > fast climb performance Paricularly in a thermal. > I do have some serious concerns about this though: > > a) I am worried about noxious chemicals such as elmer's glue. That never bothered me . > b) What are the g-load limits of a paper spar? Actually, quite high if built correctly! > c) Can I fly in the rain? There goes your g-limits on the paper spar... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 27, 1995
From: rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com (Ross Mickey )
Subject: Fwd: Firewall/Engine mount
Subject: Firewall/Engine mount I am also building my firewall for a 6A but do not have my engine mount. However, the distance between the top two tooling holes is exzctly as shown in the plans. Plans #25 shows the distance as 18 9/16 from center or 37 1/8 between the holes. This is exactly where my holes are. Ross Mickey 6A Firewall / c/s box installation I am currently building the firewall for a 6A. The tooling holes in the firewall are supposed to match with the location of the engine mount bolts but are too close together by 1/8". I have my engine mount and sure enough when you fit it over the holes they are near the inner margins of the mount bolt location tubes rather than centered. A friend building a 6 had the same mismatch. Is this a problem with the jigging at Van's (mount is correct to spec) or are we missing something like the mount is meant to be under slight compression when fitted? On another matter, if any Australian RVer on the list has Neil Bell's phone number I have his engine mount (shipped with my kit) but no way to get in touch. Cheers, Leo Davies ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WinterByte(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 27, 1995
Subject: Who Are We
John Winter Boise, Idaho WinterByte(at)aol.com Software Consultant specializing in CASE tools and data base design. RV6-A Very interesting to see who, what, and where we all are. I began the project by tooling up about 1.5 years ago. Construction on tail started in May. Took 2.5 months of full time + to complete horz stab, vert stab, and rudder. This is probably longer than average, but I have never worked with sheet metal before this. Boy, have I learned a lot! Got some good info on trim from the network. Thanks to all who took time to comment. I've decided to go with servos. Planned completion date is the year 2000. If anyone is passing over Boise on the way to RV fly-in, and you don't mind someone drooling on your plane, lets get together. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6junkie(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 27, 1995
Subject: New Member
Please add Don Riggs to the RV list. Don has an RV-4 that he finished two years ago. He has flown it about 250 hours so far! Maybe you have seen his aircraft in Kitplanes or Sport Aviation - Valerie's Nightmare. Don's e-mail address is wrgway(at)aol.com Blue Sky's and Tail Winds Gary Corde RV-6 N211GC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 27, 1995
From: gtyler(at)southwind.net (Greg Tyler)
Subject: Who we are.
My name is Greg Tyler, from Derby, Kansas - near the "Air Capital of the World" (Wichita) and have plans to build a RV-6. I am married with one little boy (2) and one on the way. (I have finally convinced my wife that this airplane is really going to happen! :^) I am leaving for Oshkosh on Friday morning - taking the low route - in a friends van. Unfortunately, we will be staying with the Q-2 bunch. I am hoping to meet some of the other rv-lister's if Sat. @ 2:00 near the RV-6T is still good? I am currently working on building a tool collection. I found a local source with new and some experienced Clecos for .25 ea! I still havn't ordered my tail kit but hope to soon. I do have the plans however. (S/N 23685) I can't wait to get started. I have enjoyed the C/S vs. Fixed pitch discussion. I still haven't made up my mind. I guess that I have a little while yet. Greg Tyler gtyler(at)southwind.net RV-6 S/N 23685 Derby, KS ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 26, 1995
From: "David A. Barnhart" <barnhart(at)crl.com>
Subject: Re: Pro-Sealing isn't so bad -Reply
On Wed, 26 Jul 1995, JIM SCHMIDT wrote: > Dave > > Did Scott put pro-seal on the skin also? No, just on the ribs > Did you put the Pro-seal over the rivet > heads after bucking? I asked him if I should do so, and his reply was, "You can if you want to." He does not normally do so, and his tanks don't leak. Best Regards, Dave Barnhart rv-6 sn 23744 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 28, 1995
From: SAI CORP Sierra Vista AZ <rmcnaney@huachuca-emh1.army.mil>
Subject: Lonesome
I just read about 100 entries and deleted them as I read. Someone talked about building one of these things by himself. I'm just looking ahead. Right now I don't have a buddy. My wife is pretty impatient ( when we bleed the brakes on the car she is bored on the first wheel). Is it possible to build a RV pretty much by oneself? Thanks in advance, Dick McNaney ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 28, 1995
From: rbibb(at)fore.com (Richard Bibb)
Subject: Re: Who Are We (chatter)
>Planned completion date is the year 2000. > I never set a completion date but at one time I said "it will be through in '92"... Well let's jsut say its almost through now... RB RV-4 N144KT that's "One -4 for Katie" my daughter... Richard E. Bibb TEL: (703) 478-9603 DOD Program Manager PAGE:(800) 719-1246 FORE Systems TEL: (301) 564-4404 6500 Rock Spring Drive, Suite 444 FAX: (301) 564-4408 Bethesda, MD 20817 rbibb(at)fore.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 28, 1995
From: Rick Solana <102131.2407(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: Pre-built fuel tanks
Here's the address and phone for one place that makes pre-built tanks.: London and Associates 7232 cedar Creek Road Scappoose, Oregon 97056 (503) 543-3986 $450 per tank, and they will build it from your parts which they will receive from Van when you order your wing. They can do one with a flop tube for aerobatics if you want, and they set them up for the typical Stewart-Warner sending units. Also ,they will make the skins 1/4 inch oversize in chord to allow you some wiggle room for fitting it on your spar. I was pretty happy with them. Both passed my balloon leak test. It seems that one has a slight twist in it ( the inboard leading edge is 1/4 inch off from the outboard leading edge now that they are mounted on the wing), but Van's says this is something not to be concerned about at this point, just wait 'til I fly it since there will be other minor "defects" which will all add up to the final performance characteristics. Also, in mounting them on the spar, I had a problem with some of the rivets on the rear of the tank interfering with the spar web to which the tank is screwed, so I had to file some of the web. I heard that this happens sometimes to builders, so it is not unique - - any one have any comments on that? Don London was great though. When I first received the tanks, I was concerned about some of the rivets not being squeezed down enough. Va's said they do a quality job, so i should talk to them. When I did, they were not hesitant to have the tanks returned for a check-up and they took care of everything. Don said that these were done while he was away and he did not get to check them before they went out. Anyway, it all came out fine, if not perfect, and I did not have to build and seal the tanks myself. I wonder if they are discontinuing the slosh compound now, since Van is no longer recomending it's use? I hope this helps. Rick ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dierks(at)austin.ibm.com
Subject: Lonesome (fwd)
Date: Jul 28, 1995
You can do it all by your lonesome except for the riveting of some of the skins which really needs two people as you don't want to screw up and put dings (smilies) on your nice skin. This includes the wing skins, most of the fuselage skins, and probably the fuel tanks. Realize that the riveting is a very small part of the building process. You can rivet both skins on one wing in one day (or say the top skin on both wings in one day). The fuselage will be done in several steps so you would need someone for about 2 to 2 and a half days total for the fuselage but spread out in about 3 sessions. The tanks can be done in a weekend. Maybe some help on the tail skins also. I had a friend that flys and is interested in RV's come over and assist on all the above riveting. Given this is spread out over a few years, it is not a big deal to get someone to help out for a day or half day here and there. All the controls (rudder, elev, flaps, ailerons) can be done by yourself to back rivet on the stiffners, etc. Lots of the riveting can be done by yourself for the small parts, like the Horiz Stab spar, rivet to spars, all the interior fuselage parts, etc. Considering the 2,000 hrs to 2500 hrs to build, the riveting is a small part. Herman > > I just read about 100 entries and deleted them as I read. Someone talked about > building one of these things by himself. I'm just looking ahead. Right now I > don't have a buddy. My wife is pretty impatient ( when we bleed the brakes on > the car she is bored on the first wheel). Is it possible to build a RV pretty > much by oneself? > > Thanks in advance, > Dick McNaney > Herman Dierks, Dept. E54S, AWSD Austin, Texas mail: dierks(at)austin.ibm.com VM: DIERKS at AUSVM6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 28, 1995
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: Re: Lonesome
> I just read about 100 entries and deleted them as I read. Someone talked about > building one of these things by himself. I'm just looking ahead. Right now I > don't have a buddy. My wife is pretty impatient ( when we bleed the brakes on > the car she is bored on the first wheel). Is it possible to build a RV pretty > much by oneself? Yes, in fact I prefer it. I only call for a second pair of hands when absolutely necessary, maybe 5% of the time. The other 95% of the time I can be a hermit and listen to whatever music I want. Sometimes I let the cat watch. Randall Henderson RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 28, 1995
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: Re: Courtaulds Phone #
> > Does any body know where to get technical > info from Courtaulds. > These numbers/names are from a year or so ago, I don't know if they're current but they should be a good place to start: Courtaulds Aerospace Technical questions - Craig Michellock 818-548-7795 Courtaulds Aerospace, sealant divisio 818-549-7816 Bill Keller Randall Henderson RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6junkie(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 28, 1995
Subject: Lonesome (reply)
Unless you have arms like Stretch Armstrong, I can=92t imagine building a= n RV alone. Somebody is going to have to get inside the fuselage the buck riv= ets. Same holds true for the wings. There are countless times when you will ne= ed some kind of hands-on assistance. Another consideration. Unless you have built an aircraft before, or hold = an A&P certificate, it will be very frustrating to work on the aircraft with= out some hands on help in the beginning. Most projects that fail due so out o= f total frustration. Look into one of the many building seminars that seem = to be popping up all over the place. That=92s a great way to find-out what i= s involved. Look to the local EAA chapter and find someone who has built or= is in an advanced stage of building an RV. Van probably has some of the best technical support in the business but i= t is hard to describe some things over the phone. This network seems to be a g= ood forum as well. For what it=92s worth, my wife was not at all happy the day I came back f= rom Oshkosh with a set of plans for an RV-6...but that didn=92t stop her from= bucking about half of the rivets in it. She knew how important it was to= me and never complained about it Good Luck Gary Corde RV-6 N211GC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 28, 1995
From: mike casmey <102023.1363(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: unsubscribe
please remove me from the list under this name MIKE.CASMEY(at)SWAMP.MN.ORG I'm still on under another address ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 28, 1995
From: J.Ken_Hitchmough(at)mail.magic.ca (J.Ken Hitchmough)
Subject: Re: Lonesome
>Is it possible to build a RV pretty >much by oneself? Apart from some bucking that really takes two, plus the ocassional help in lifting heavy parts like engines and wings, it is most certainly possible to build one by yourself. This is MY preferred mode as I can think, do whatever I like and not consider anyone else. However I gotta add that a couple of people contributed to mine a great deal, sometimes without even touching the 'plane. 1. My wife, who cooked, cleaned and waited patiently for those undone house chores. I'd never be this far along without her support. 2. A couple of buddies (David Fried, Al Ludford) who helped on those necessary two man tasks (probably about 5-10% of the kit) but more importantly were at the other end of the phone when I needed an ear because part 'a' wouldn't quite go with part 'b'. Thanks guys. Ken wiring my '6a (while my wife cooks dinner ;-) -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Magic Online Services Toronto Inc. (416) 591-6490 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 29, 1995
From: "Terence C. Gannon" <74267.3003(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: Navaid Device Autopilot - Possible IFR Use?
Further to Jerry's note on the Navaid (very interesting), I got to thinking about the RV-6 as an IFR platform. I know that this probably sounds counter to Van's philosophy of keeping the RV simple, but I would be interested in hearing of people's experience in flying any of the RV's IFR. For those of you following along at home, you'll probably wonder why somebody (ie. me) who hasn't started building yet, and doesn't have the IFR ticket would be asking such as question, but I guess I'm just trying to think ahead! :-) Thanx for your help... Terry in Calgary "Reviewing Preview Plans S/N 24414" ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CRazer2(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 29, 1995
Subject: Rudder Fit Advice Needed
When fitting the rudder to the Vertical Stab., I realize the adjustments are made by screwing the three hinge bolts in the rudder spar in or out. This changes the clearance between the rudder leading edge and the Vertical Stab. main spar. I also realize the three bolts must be aligned properly. How do I know when my rudder is properly fit to my V/S. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mike.casmey(at)swamp.mn.org
Date: Jul 29, 1995
Subject: unsubscribe
unsubscribe rv-list ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: rv8
Date: Jul 30, 1995
From: "Dell M. Auer" <auer(at)teleport.com>
-- [ From: Dell M. Auer * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] -- Greetings Gang Does any one know if Van got the hours off of his RV8 and did he make it to OSH. Regards Dell ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 30, 1995
From: "John P. Foy" <102370.3241(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: CS prop
On my RV-6A I'm using a Lyc 0-360-A1A engine with the Hartzell CS prop. Since I'm really at heart a cheap bugger, I decided on the CS prop for a number of reasons: 1. It's the ONLY way you are going to get the full 180 hp when you need it the most, i.e. on takeoff and go around. I just hate to pay for hp that I can't use! 2. You will never be satisfied with a fixed pitch prop and you will probably wind up with two or three fixed pitch props to get the one that will come closest to your own specs. 3.Formation flying is a lot easier with the CS prop since you can set an RPM setting that will let you keep up with the others by just adjusting the throttle. 4.In cruise you will not have to ask the leader to "give me a couple hundred RPMs so I can keep up. 5. Your climb will be SIGNIFICANTLY improved from a cruise fixed pitch prop. Forget about faster top speeds at low altitudes as the top speed on the RVs is a function of more than just a CS prop. 6. At altitudes above 4000 ft you will be able to set up just about any manifold pressure you want and lean out accordingly. Good Luck......John ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 30, 1995
From: Rick Solana <102131.2407(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: re: Rudder Fit Advice Needed
Drawing 6 identifies the distances which you should have bettween the rudder spar web and the vertical stabilizer spar web. These distances are different at the top and bottom. Get you top and bottom bolts to give you those distances, then make the middle bolt line up. Good luck. Rick Solana ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: rv8
Date: Jul 30, 1995
From: "Kevin E. Vap" <kvap(at)solar.sky.net>
-- [ From: Kevin E. Vap * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] -- >Date: Sunday, 30-Jul-95 08:22 AM >From: Dell M. Auer \ Internet: (teleport.com!auer@matronics. com) >Subject: rv8 >Greetings Gang >Does any one know if Van got the hours off of his RV8 and did he make >it to OSH. >Regards >Dell I just got back this morning (Sunday @6:00 am after a 10 hour drive during the night). Yes, the RV-8 was at the show (at the booth). It looked pretty good (more room, bigger panel over the -4). I'll let the RV-4 experts describe it better when they get back. -Kevin Vap "RV-6" kvap@sky.net http://www.sky.net/~kvap ________________________________________________________________________________ by ono.lincoln.ac.nz (PMDF V4.3-13 #7492)
Date: Jul 31, 1995
From: Stephen Bell <steve(at)discus.lincoln.ac.nz>
Subject: Re: Tip up canopy gas struts.
> > Steve, > The last RVator had a nice set of photos on a NZ RV6 (-RVL). > These photos showed that the two builders had installed gas struts to hold > open their tip-up canopy, but that the struts were installed in a different > location from normal. They were much further forward than other > installations I have seen, giving less obstruction during entry. > > Do you know these guys, and/or could you find out any more details > of their canopy gas strut installation and report back to the RV-list?? > > ... thanks Gil Alexander ... Hi Gil & others, I made some enquiries about this, I ended up talking to Sam Chartres who is building an RV-6 (SRV?) in the Te Anau area here in the south island. Sam worked out the orignal details for this installation which was also used by the builders of the RV-6 ZK-RVL. He has given me some details & drawings which should be sufficient to enable you to locally source gas struts to similar specs. I understand that when closed the struts "push" the canopy in the opposite direction to the vans installation. Sam mentioned a gap being created on his 6 when trialing the system prior to having everything riveted together. My interpretation was that the canopy frame structures were only clecoed together at that point, and that he didn't think this was a problem on ZK-RVL which is now flying. Without the engine running & the canopy unlatched it rests in the closed position, with a light touch it moves into the open position. From Sams description it sounded quite stable. Gil, I planned on scanning in the drawings & e-mailing them to you, do you have any preferences on the format (postscript,pcx,jpeg...???) RV-list folks, e-mail me if you're interested in getting the drawings, if there is sufficient interest I'll mail them to the list, otherwise i'll reply individually. Steve. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----- Stephen Bell | Lincoln University, \--------------------(*)--------------------/ Canterbury, New Zealand. NIMBUS II - Driver XX RV 6 - Growing in the garage. E-Mail: S.Bell(at)ono.lincoln.ac.nz work steve(at)discus.lincoln.ac.nz play ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 31, 1995
From: luism(at)ibm.net (Luis Madsen)
Subject: Superior Air Parts fax number ?
Could anybody please help me with the fax number to Superior Air Parts? What I have is the address: 14280 Gillis Road, Dallas, Texas 75244-3792; phone 800/299-5802. This does not help me, as I can not dial a 800 number from Denmark. Have any of you experience with the service and parts quality from them. Luis Madsen, Denmark luism(at)ibm.net RV6 60% luism(at)ibm.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: gasobek(at)CCGATE.HAC.COM
Date: Jul 31, 1995
Subject: Flight testing.
The FAA just released a revised Advisory Circular on Amateur-Built Aircraft and Ultralight Flight Testing on May 25, 1995. If anyone wants a copy, contact the FAA at: U. S. Department of Transportation Property Use and Storage Section, M-45.3 Washington, DC 20590 Order / request: AC 90-89A. Gary RV-6 20480 N-157GS ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 31, 1995
From: Don Wentz <Don_Wentz(at)ccm2.hf.intel.com>
Subject: Re[2]: Rudder Fit Advice Needed
You will also want to make it fit in relation to the skins on the VS, when turned to 'the stops'. Depending on how closely you want your VS skins-to-rudder gap, this will take some trial and error. I did this final adjustment with everything on the fuse. The Duck, N790DW, 180HP RV-6, #20369 >Drawing 6 identifies the distances which you should have bettween the >rudder spar web and the vertical stabilizer spar web. These distances are >different at >the top and bottom. Get you top and bottom bolts to give you those distances, >then make the middle bolt line up. Good luck. >Rick Solana ________________________________________________________________________________ (Soft*Switch Central V4L380P5) id 743316070095212FAOPARI;
Date: Jul 31, 1995
From: "NMARSHAL" <NMARSHAL(at)AOPARI.remnet.rockwell.com>
Subject: NOTE 07/31/95 19:56:00
please enter my name (nmarshal) as a subscriber ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6junkie(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 31, 1995
Subject: Lonesome (reply)
Unless you have arms like Stretch Armstrong, I can=92t imagine building a= n RV alone. Somebody is going to have to get inside the fuselage the buck riv= ets. Same holds true for the wings. There are countless times when you will ne= ed some kind of hands-on assistance. Another consideration. Unless you have built an aircraft before, or hold = an A&P certificate, it will be very frustrating to work on the aircraft with= out some hands on help in the beginning. Most projects that fail due so out o= f total frustration. Look into one of the many building seminars that seem = to be popping up all over the place. That=92s a great way to find-out what i= s involved. Look to the local EAA chapter and find someone who has built or= is in an advanced stage of building an RV. Van probably has some of the best technical support in the business but i= t is hard to describe some things over the phone. This network seems to be a g= ood forum as well. For what it=92s worth, my wife was not at all happy the day I came back f= rom Oshkosh with a set of plans for an RV-6...but that didn=92t stop her from= bucking about half of the rivets in it. She knew how important it was to= me and never complained about it Good Luck Gary Corde RV-6 N211GC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Graves <mgraves(at)ptdcs2.intel.com>
Subject: Superior Air Parts fax number ?
Date: Jul 31, 1995
Luis Madsen writes: > > Could anybody please help me with the fax number to Superior Air Parts? > > What I have is the address: > 14280 Gillis Road, Dallas, Texas 75244-3792; phone 800/299-5802. > > This does not help me, as I can not dial a 800 number from Denmark. > > Have any of you experience with the service and parts quality from them. > > Luis Madsen, Denmark > luism(at)ibm.net > > RV6 60% > luism(at)ibm.net > > The 800 number given is for some dude ranch. The correct number is: 1-800-487-4884. I called them and the FAX number is (214)233-5474 Good luck! Mike Graves ________________________________________________________________________________
From: jeayers(at)CCGATE.HAC.COM
Date: Jul 31, 1995
Subject: Warnke Prop
>The Duck, N790DW, 180HP RV-6, #20369 - Said; >As a side note, I have never been satisfied with the climb performance of my >prop (73L x 72p). It is a great cruiser, I usually cruise at 2450 and burn >less fuel than 0-320 equipped RVs. But I want more pull so I sent it back for >Bernie to take 1" of pitch out. It climbs better and I can get almost 2650 >flat-out, but I want more, so last night Doug Miner helped me take 1" off the >length. We think this will increase rpm almost 100. I'll let you know what >happens. I am interested in knowing the results of the 1" change in diameter on your Warnke Prop. Also, are the tips of your Warnke prop exceptionally small?? (Warnke has a couple of different blade designs.) I removed 3/4" from the diameter of the Warnke 72"(dia) x 70"(pitch) prop on the Lyc O-290 I had on my RV-3. I had the following RPM change; 72" Dia. 71 1/4" Dia Static RPM 2350 2350 Climb RPM 2250 2350 Max Speed RPM 2600 2600 BTW, I have a Warnke Prop 68x68 pusher prop on my RV-3 with the LOM engine. I get 2200 RPM for climb. However, Bernie was surprised to learn that I could over-speed the engine straight and level, if I pulled more than 32 inches of manifold pressure. (Yes, the engine is rated for 2700RPM and 35 inches of MP.) Jim Ayers RV-3 #10050 (323.7 Hrs on Lyc O-290, now flying as the Long Nose RV-3, 11.1 Hrs) From: dierks(at)austin.ibm.com Subject: Superior Air Parts Date: Mon, 31 Jul 1995 16:21:12 -0500 (CDT) > > Have any of you experience with the service and parts quality from them. > > Luis Madsen, Denmark > luism(at)ibm.net > Luis, I have used Superior parts. I rebuilt a Cont. O-300 and a Lyc O-320, both major OH. I used as many parts as I could get from them and think they have very good quality and prices. On the O320, I did use a Lyc oil pump parts and Lyc. rod bolts (Superior was out of rod bolts at the time) Superior did have a problem with getting a bad batch of Rod bolts last year and you may have seen the AD on this. Their normal supplier was out as was Lyc. Superior found some in Germany and the samples they tested were indeed Lyc. rod bolts. They bought the entire batch and the rest of the batch was bogus bolts and two failed in use. In general, they have equal or better quality and stand behind their parts. Herman Dierks, Dept. E54S, AWSD Austin, Texas mail: dierks(at)austin.ibm.com VM: DIERKS at AUSVM6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 31, 1995
From: Don Wentz <Don_Wentz(at)ccm2.hf.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Warnke Prop
Jim, I tried to add my data below. Actually, the person who estimated a 100 rpm increase for a 1" loss of length was the guy who owns Pacesetter props. If you look at a Pacesetter vs a Warnke at the tip, there is significantly more material there, so his estimate didn't hold for a Warnke (not his fault). My 73" prop had about 1.5" by <1/4" at the tip, and almost NO pitch. We removed about 3/4" total length and I really can't tell a difference. I think I will go for another 3/4" and try that. NOTE - my prop has more cross section in the center and is a newer design from the Warnke high-aspect ratio prop that I see on lots of RVs, so this discussion does NOT xlate to those props. dw >As a side note, I have never been satisfied with the climb performance of my >prop (73L x 72p). It is a great cruiser, I usually cruise at 2450 and burn >less fuel than 0-320 equipped RVs. But I want more pull so I sent it back for >Bernie to take 1" of pitch out. It climbs better and I can get almost 2650 >flat-out, but I want more, so last night Doug Miner helped me take 1" off the >length. We think this will increase rpm almost 100. I'll let you know what >happens. I am interested in knowing the results of the 1" change in diameter on your Warnke Prop. Also, are the tips of your Warnke prop exceptionally small?? (Warnke has a couple of different blade designs.) I removed 3/4" from the diameter of the Warnke 72"(dia) x 70"(pitch) prop on the Lyc O-290 I had on my RV-3. I had the following RPM change; JP DP JP DP 72" Dia. 73" 71 1/4" Dia 72.25" Static RPM 2350 2250 2350 2250 Climb RPM 2250 2150 2350 2200 Max Speed RPM 2600 2650 2600 2650 BTW, I have a Warnke Prop 68x68 pusher prop on my RV-3 with the LOM engine. I get 2200 RPM for climb. However, Bernie was surprised to learn that I could over-speed the engine straight and level, if I pulled more than 32 inches of manifold pressure. (Yes, the engine is rated for 2700RPM and 35 inches of MP.) Jim Ayers RV-3 #10050 (323.7 Hrs on Lyc O-290, now flying as the Long Nose RV-3, 11.1 Hrs) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 31, 1995
From: Curt Reimer <Curt_Reimer(at)NtwkServ.MTS.MB.CA>
Subject: Re: rv8
On Sun, 30 Jul 1995, Dell M. Auer wrote: > Greetings Gang > Does any one know if Van got the hours off of his RV8 and did he make > it to OSH. Yes. Its a beauty. Curt Reimer ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 31, 1995
From: rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com (Ross Mickey )
Subject: Firewall Cosmetics
For those of you who might want to add a slick look to the engine side of the firewall, try this. I used a 2" blue Scothbright wheel to create a "fishscale" patten on the engine side of the firewall. I made a jig from a piece of lath or you could use a yardstick. I put a half round impression on the side of the yardstick on every inch mark using the side of a drill running in my drill press the same diameter as the shaft of the Scotchbright wheel. Mark every other inch with a red pen and the other ones with a blue pen. I clamped a piece of 3/4" angle along each side of the firewall as it lay flat on a table (an old closet door on saw horses). These angles were marked every inch. I screwed two samll pieces of 3/4" angle into the yardstick the width of the distance between the two pieces of angle clamped to the table. These are used to secure the yardstick to the angle using cleco clamps, visegrips or c-clamps. The yadstick will be sitting 3/4" above the firewall paralel to the bottom of the firewall. Place the shaft of the Scothbright wheel in the first notch which hits the edge of the firewall and hold for about 10 seconds. This will create a Very bright circle with subtle scratch marks. Move the wheel over TWO inches to the same colored notch (if the first was red move to the next red) and repeat accros the firewall. Now move the yardstick up ONE inch. Place the shank of the Scothbright wheel in the ALTERNATE colored notch ( if red the last row use blue this row). Keep doing this over the whole firewall and you end up with a beautiful fishscale pattern on the firewall. Why you ask? Just because its neat!! Some builders have used the same process on the engine baffles. These have to be prtected with a clear coating since they are aluminum. Ross Mickey 6-A Firewall construction. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 31, 1995
From: rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com (Ross Mickey )
Subject: Fwd: Navaid Device Autopilot - Possible IFR Use?
Subject: Navaid Device Autopilot - Possible IFR Use? Terry, The December 1992 RVATOR had two articles about IFR in RV's. The first was written by Earl Brabant, a CFII. He tested the factories RV6-T. The three page review has lots of tidbits. His conclusion, "I believe the RV is suitable for IFR flight and roughly compares in difficulty to some other light aircraft I've flown. It depends on your perspective; many big-iron pilots might find it to twitchy and too much work. Compared to my kind of flying, it seems pretty normal." The other article was by Pete Stevenson, a RV-6 builder equipped with IFR panel and Navaid autopilot. His impressions after two years and 35 hours IFR, "Considering the role the RV-6 is designed for, it does an acceptable job in the clouds. Lateral stability is marginal. With a good aileron system it is adequate, but the airplane does require constant attention while on gauges. I have found the autopilot to be indispensable for any protracted periods of IFR flight." He goes on to remark about problems of normal approach speeds being above flap operating speeds which makes it difficult to obtain required decent rates. He has a wood prop. Using a constant speed would help this. His final comment is to not equiped for IFR, spend the money on gas and "Keep it simple, keep it light and fly a lot." Ross Mickey Firewall -cut hole out for gov. box now thats a job!!!!!! Further to Jerry's note on the Navaid (very interesting), I got to thinking about the RV-6 as an IFR platform. I know that this probably sounds counter to Van's philosophy of keeping the RV simple, but I would be interested in hearing of people's experience in flying any of the RV's IFR. For those of you following along at home, you'll probably wonder why somebody (ie. me) who hasn't started building yet, and doesn't have the IFR ticket would be asking such as question, but I guess I'm just trying to think ahead! :-) Thanx for your help... Terry in Calgary "Reviewing Preview Plans S/N 24414" ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 31, 1995
From: gil(at)rassp.hac.com (Gil Alexander)
Subject: Firewall cutting
>Subject: *** was *** Navaid Device Autopilot - Possible IFR Use? > >Terry, > >The December 1992 RVATOR had two articles about IFR in RV's. The first >was written by Earl Brabant, a CFII. He tested the factories RV6-T. *** interesting IFR discussion cut out **** >this. His final comment is to not equiped for IFR, spend the money on >gas and "Keep it simple, keep it light and fly a lot." > > >Ross Mickey >Firewall -cut hole out for gov. box now thats a job!!!!!! ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Guys, ..... I am just about to cut this out to fit in Vans old (bend it yourself) -6A firewall recess. Does anyone have any good hints on how to cut this 8 by 10 inch (approx) hole out of the stainless steel??? Drilling it was somewhat of a pain :^) , and I am guessing that cutting it is a bigger pain. ... thanks ..... Gil Alexander, RV6A, #20701, reserving N164GA this week. Oshkosh had the FAA registry people there, and there were only 2 numbers left in the NxxxGA series. If you fancy a special registration, apply now with your $10, the lower numbers seem to be going fast. PS ... Vans -6A firewall recess now comes from Barnard Aircraft Co. and is already formed and spot welded into shape. About $37 as an optional part I believe. > *** more cut out *** > >Thanx for your help... > >Terry in Calgary >"Reviewing Preview Plans S/N 24414" ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 31, 1995
From: klgray(at)bihs.net (Ken Gray)
Subject: Who are we
Ken Gray Bryan, Texas RV6 SN: 23069 Almost done with finish kit. Setting it up for IFR, 0320 E2D, Fixed pitch. Started October 1993 expect first flight December 95. N number applied for. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Re-Post of List Format (non-tech)
Date: Aug 01, 1995
From: Bill Downey <billd(at)ibmoto.com>
William Downey Austin, Texas billd(at)ibmoto.com RV-6A SN-22334 I work for IBM designing PowerPC microprocessors. I have a wife and a cute little girl getting close to two years old. I love building things and I love flying. Constructing an RV gives me a chance to combine these two. So far I am still stuck on the tail. Most of this is inertia rather than any difficultly with the plans or kit. I moved into a new house last October with a three car garage. I have most of my new home projects out of the way and hope to get back to building soon. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GETIPSWO(at)uop.com (GETIPSWO)
Date: Aug 01, 2019
Subject: Platenuts on inboard wing rib...
Here's a question for you finishing kit or flying builders. RV6 DWG 46 ambiguously shows some platenuts on both the top and bottom flanges of the inboard wing rib, presumably for attatching wing root fairings. The reference I see in the plans is the edgewise depiction which does not show how many or spacing between the platenuts. Van also refers to these platenuts in a brief paragraph in "14 Years of the RVator... Yes Virginia...". My question is at the time of skinning my wings, what to I need to anticipate and allow for before I rivet the skins on? Thanks. Greg Tipsword RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JerryFlyRV(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 01, 1995
Subject: Re: Firewall cutting
> ..... I am just about to cut this out to fit in Vans old (bend it >yourself) -6A firewall recess. > > Does anyone have any good hints on how to cut this 8 by 10 inch >(approx) hole out of the stainless steel??? Gil Best way to cut the firewall is with a die grinder and a small fiber cutting wheel simular to the one Van sends for cutting the canopy and use a good pair of safety glasses. Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 1995
From: Earl W Brabandt <Earl_W_Brabandt(at)ccm.jf.intel.com>
Subject: IFR in RVs
Text item: >Subject: *** was *** Navaid Device Autopilot - Possible IFR Use? > >Terry, > >The December 1992 RVATOR had two articles about IFR in RV's. The first >was written by Earl Brabant, a CFII. He tested the factories RV6-T. *** interesting IFR discussion cut out **** >this. His final comment is to not equiped for IFR, spend the money on >gas and "Keep it simple, keep it light and fly a lot." Hmmm, we haven't seen much discusion of this often popular subject recently. It's certainly generated a few heated debates in the past. It appears to be on it's way back though. Actually, I believe that was another article which voiced an opposing point of view. To summarize my impressions: I believe that the suitability of an RV for IFR flight is more a function of the pilot than the aircraft. Many pilots accustomed to flying larger airplanes find 152s challenging on the gauges. It's all a matter of what you're used to and how much you practice -- and of course what kind of flying you're interested in doing. Calin Brabandt (formerly Earl) ATP: S & MEL, SES; CFI: IA, S & ME RV-6 N66VR in progress Text item: External Message Header The following mail header is for administrative use and may be ignored unless there are problems. ***IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS SAVE THESE HEADERS***. Subject: Firewall cutting From: rassp.hac.com!gil(at)matronics.com (Gil Alexander) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 1995 18:48:22 -0800 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 1995
From: Don Wentz <Don_Wentz(at)ccm2.hf.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Firewall cutting
Gil, >this. His final comment is to not equiped for IFR, spend the money on >gas and "Keep it simple, keep it light and fly a lot." > I agree 100% with this. All of my IFR stuff is coming out this winter, since my first year and 200 hrs of flying in my -6 shows me that light weight is highest priority, fun flying in decent weather is my most frequent mission, long cross country only 2 or three times a year. Park it if the weather sucks. >>Ross Mickey >>Firewall -cut hole out for gov. box now thats a job!!!!!! ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >..... I am just about to cut this out to fit in Vans old (bend it >yourself) -6A firewall recess. >Does anyone have any good hints on how to cut this 8 by 10 inch >(approx) hole out of the stainless steel??? >Drilling it was somewhat of a pain :^) , and I am guessing that >cutting it is a bigger pain. Just drill a pilot hole in each corner, enlarge it enought with a unibit to get your snips started, and snip it out. the .020 SS cuts very easily with snips, just use care to prevent 'curling'. And watch out for those slivers!!! Youch. The Duck, N790DW, 180HP RV-6, #20369 ... thanks ..... Gil Alexander, RV6A, #20701, reserving N164GA this week. Oshkosh had the FAA registry people there, and there were only 2 numbers left in the NxxxGA series. If you fancy a special registration, apply now with your $10, the lower numbers seem to be going fast. PS ... Vans -6A firewall recess now comes from Barnard Aircraft Co. and is already formed and spot welded into shape. About $37 as an optional part I believe. > *** more cut out *** > >Thanx for your help... > >Terry in Calgary >"Reviewing Preview Plans S/N 24414" ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 1995
From: <Jim=Preston%10AF%AFRESEM(at)wrb.afres.af.mil> (Maj, 303FS, Whiteman AFB, MO,
DSN 975-3620 or 3489)
Subject: Oshkosh, Building Seminars
Well, I've been to Mecca, and I've seen the light! Just got back from Oshkosh, where I spent the 25th & 26th taking a seminar at Skystruck Enterprises learning about building RVs. Ken Scott from Van's was there teaching basic sheet metal techniques; the class consisted of me, Tom (a recent retiree), Chuck (a jeweler), and Wayne, whose wife and daughter also participated. We were disappointed that there weren't more people there, but it made for a better instructor-student ratio. My background is that I fly A-10s in the Air Force Reserve, haven't built anything resembling an airplane, and don't consider myself to be all that handy. My wife was, and is, still pretty dead set against this project, so I thought this seminar might force the issue, in that if I felt like it was beyond my capabilities, I could back out with a minimal monetary investment. (I had also planned to do the Van's seminar in Oregon, but Ken said that this one had pretty much the same information, so I may not do that.) The seminar was very well done, and one I would recommend to potential builders who aren't sure if they're capable of doing this. John and Betty Monett at Skystruck were super to work with...they really made us feel welcome. They have another seminar scheduled for September 9 & 10, and their number is 800-759-7875. Don't worry about calling late; they can accomodate lots of folks. Now for the down side...after the seminar, I felt like I could actually build an RV-6. Physically, the work isn't impossible. However, after walking around the RV parking area at Oshkosh and seeing so many beautiful examples of RV craftsmanship, I don't know if I'd be happy with anything less than perfection. I saw Jerry Scott's new -6, built in 85 days. I was drooling on it when Jerry VanGrunsven came by with Judy, and we were all in awe. Nearby was Lyle Hefel's -6, another outstanding example of workmanship. (Lyle's is for sale, by the way.) Between the two of them, I don't know if what I could do would be good enough. There weren't really ANY bad ones there, some were just slightly better than others...made me wonder if the "dogs" were afraid to come, or if all of the RVs out there are that good. You have to understand, I fly A-10s, so looks aren't all that important to me, but I don't want piece of dogdoo out there either. Oh, well...I have to keep working on the wife anyway. By the way, I got to meet Van and see the RV-8 up close and personal. All of a sudden, my wife sitting in the back may not be so bad after all. I also met Bob and Judy Avery of Avery Tools fame (super folks, very down-home and friendly), DJ Lauritsen of Cleaveland Tools and DJ's Interiors (also very friendly), and George and Becky Orndorff who make the "How-To" videos (again, real friendly people). It was cool to see so many people who make the RV the phenomenon that it is. I've got the preview plans, a subscription to the RVator, and Matt Dralle's been religiously filling up my email box with your posts, so the only thing I'm waiting on is a European trip with the family next summer before I can get started (a concession to the wife). Meanwhile, I'll go back to my "lurk" mode, and try to keep up with everything you're all discussing. It makes so much more sense now after that seminar! Jim RV-6 #24312 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 1995
From: rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com (Ross Mickey )
Subject: Fwd: Firewall cutting
Subject: Firewall cutting Gil, I used a cut-off wheel from Avery (part 01028 $4.50) running in a standard electric drill. I started using an air toool but couldn't maintain a high enough rpm. I like the results. The entire cut-off wheel was eaten up in the process. Very little filing was needed. The metal does get hot and discolored a bit at the cut, but this gets covered over by the flanges of the box. (I've been told by some to place the flanges on the engine side rather than hiding them between the firewall and angle. Any comments????) Ross Mickey 6-A Got the jig delivered last night Does anyone have any good hints on how to cut this 8 by 10 inch (approx) hole out of the stainless steel??? Drilling it was somewhat of a pain :^) , and I am guessing that cutting it is a bigger pain. ... thanks ..... Gil Alexander, RV6A, #20701, reserving N164GA this week. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 01, 1995
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: Re: Portland RVators Newsletter & Re: experience
> I am looking for an ongoing RV project that I can hang around for a while > to get acclimated. I plan on starting my -6A this year (yeah, sure), and > I would like to get some exposure to some real building before I plunge > into mine. I would prefer a westside project like Hillsboro area. > > Mike Graves Mike: I plan to publish the roster in the newsletter this month. Hopefully that will be of some help. All: Want to be famous? Too bad. But if you want to see yourself in a weenie little newsletter, send me your stuff! The deadline for Portland RVators Newsletter input this month is end-of-the-day Thursday, August 3rd. Meeting place is still undecided, I'll post it (and put it in the newsletter of course) as soon as I know. Randall ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Paul Clanton / City of Thornton <thornmis(at)usa.net>
Subject: un-subscribe
Date: Aug 01, 1995
please un-subscribe jgoodman(at)nyx.cs.du.edu thnaks ________________________________________________________________________________
From: bobn(at)ims.com
Date: Aug 01, 1995
Subject: Re: Firewall cutting
I just did that job myself. I drilled corner holes with a hole saw, then used snips. It was fast and easy! No smoking metal or pieced of grinding wheel imbeded in my face. I finished up by clamping each side between two pieces of wood, then used a small sanding disk in my die grinder (120 grit) to smooth out any rough spots. >>Ross Mickey >>Firewall -cut hole out for gov. box now thats a job!!!!!! > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >Guys, > ..... I am just about to cut this out to fit in Vans old (bend it >yourself) -6A firewall recess. > > Does anyone have any good hints on how to cut this 8 by 10 inch >(approx) hole out of the stainless steel??? > > Drilling it was somewhat of a pain :^) , and I am guessing that >cutting it is a bigger pain. > > ... thanks ..... Gil Alexander, RV6A, #20701, reserving N164GA this week. > > Oshkosh had the FAA registry people > there, and there were only 2 numbers > left in the NxxxGA series. If you > fancy a special registration, apply > now with your $10, the lower numbers > seem to be going fast. > >PS ... Vans -6A firewall recess now comes from Barnard Aircraft Co. and is >already formed and spot welded into shape. About $37 as an optional part I >believe. > > > > > >> > >*** more cut out *** > >> >>Thanx for your help... >> >>Terry in Calgary >>"Reviewing Preview Plans S/N 24414" > > > > _____________________________ Bob Neuner Production Scheduling Supervisor Integrated Measurement Systems (503) 626-5262 bobn(at)ims.com _____________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RGWELCH(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 01, 1995
Subject: North Plains Coordinates
RVer's I would like someone to post the latitude/longitude coordinates for the North Plains airport. Someone must have entered them in his or her GPS. Then, I won't have to strain my eyes looking at the Seattle Sectional figuring it out myself. There seems to be several private strips within a few miles of each other near HIO. I want to fly down to the potluck in Sept., weather permitting. Thanx, RGWELCH ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dierks(at)austin.ibm.com
Subject: FYI, using die grinders
Date: Aug 01, 1995
> > I used a cut-off wheel from Avery (part 01028 $4.50) running in a > standard electric drill. I started using an air toool but couldn't > maintain a high enough rpm. FYI, for tools like die grinders, you need to use a large diameter air host to get the volume of air to the tool. A small diam. hose will not cut it. I think I used a 3/8" ID host. At anyrate, larger than the typical cheap (1/4inch) air host. I have also found that the Unibit works well to drill into Stainless Steel. Drill a small pilot hole (1/8in. or so) and then use the unibit. Herman Dierks, Dept. E54S, AWSD Austin, Texas mail: dierks(at)austin.ibm.com VM: DIERKS at AUSVM6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RGWELCH(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 01, 1995
Subject: Fwd: North Plains Coordinates
Bounced, trying again. Regards, --------------------- From: aol.com!RGWELCH(at)matronics.com Date: 95-08-01 22:34:21 EDT RVer's I would like someone to post the latitude/longitude coordinates for the North Plains airport. Someone must have entered them in his or her GPS. Then, I won't have to strain my eyes looking at the Seattle Sectional figuring it out myself. There seems to be several private strips within a few miles of each other near HIO. I want to fly down to the potluck in Sept., weather permitting. Thanx, RGWELCH ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6junkie(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 02, 1995
Subject: Re: Platenuts on inboard wing rib...
Those plate-nuts on the bottom of the wing are VERY IMPORTANT! They attach the bottom fuselage skin to the wing and they are STRUCTURAL. The spacing is 2" as they fall between the rivets that attach the root rib and the skin. You can't drill them untill you fit the wings to the fuselage. As for the plate nuts on the top of the wings, they are for the root fairing and they are also drilled in assembly. Gary Corde RV-6 N211GC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 02, 1995
From: gil(at)rassp.hac.com (Gil Alexander)
Subject: FAA "N" number reservation form
RV-listers, Footer from my last posting:-- "Oshkosh had the FAA registry people there, and there were only 2 numbers left in the NxxxGA series. If you fancy a special registration, apply now with your $10, the lower numbers seem to be going fast." I must have still been suffering from OFBS -- "Oshkosh Fried Brain Syndrome" [defined as: overload of airplane stuff, coupled with mild sunstroke and dehydration :^) ] ...I really meant 2 numbers left in the NxxGA series. Following is a form copied from one the FAA were handing out at Oshkosh for reserving a US registration number. It is simpler than the form Herman D. previously posted, which was more applicable to the actual registration process. This form only requests that the FAA holds a registration number for you at a cost of $10 per year. They said that they send a reminder notice out each year for the $10 renewal fee. An actual aircraft does not have to be specified, and the reservation of this number does not show in the FAA aircraft registry data base presently on internet ( from havard.edu ). Since no actual aircraft is associated with the number, the local state tax collectors don't get informed, and should be held at bay. After all, what's the personal property value of a number?? ******** form follows ***** just cut and paste ***** RESERVATION OF AN "N" NUMBER I wish to reserve a Registration Number to be used at a later date. The fee to reserve a Registration Number is $10 per year. My choices are: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Signature: ____________________________ Name: _________________________________ Address: ______________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ Phone: ________________________________ Mail request and Fee to: FAA Aircraft Registry PO Box 25504 Oklahoma City, OK 73125 ******* end of form ********* .... get your favorite number now, before it goes.... Gil Alexander ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 02, 1995
From: <Jim=Preston%10AF%AFRESEM(at)wrb.afres.af.mil> (Maj, 303FS, Whiteman AFB, MO,
DSN 975-3620 or 3489)
Subject: Craftsmanship
Don, Re your last concerning the amount of time guys will spend on their projects versus what they get out of it...I think you made some excellent points. I agree that you can spend hours, if not days, trying to make that joint fit to 1/64" instead of 1/32 or even 1/16. At the Oshkosh Skystruck seminar, Ken Scott said that the airplane doesn't know the difference between 1/32" or 1/16". Would it be worth the added aggravation for something that most people might glance at and say, "Nice work..." as they wander over to look at the next guy's machine. I'm not belittling the people who DO get intense pride at those things...heck, I admire them, but I'm not the like purist who left a post a couple of weeks ago saying that Van was taking the fun out of this by pre-punching skins, etc. At what point will the purist say that "we're just assembling parts instead of creating an airplane"? I'll bet this guy doesn't make his own aluminum out of bauxite, either. No, your message wasn't condescending...I appreciate the sentiments. I'd rather spend that time in the air or with my family than sweating out measuring gaps with a micrometer. Thanks for the encouragement. Jim ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 02, 1995
From: <Jim=Preston%10AF%AFRESEM(at)wrb.afres.af.mil> (Maj, 303FS, Whiteman AFB, MO,
DSN 975-3620 or 3489)
Subject: How Did You Do It?
I have a bunch of questions regarding this whole process; I'm getting closer than ever to making the big jump, but I probably still need the answers to these questions. (This is the first of many lists you'll see from me...sorry.) 1. How did you RV'ers talk your spouses into this whole thing? Mine is VERY anti-RV right now; her [most printable] quote was, "This is the dumbest idea you've ever come up with!" 2. What is a ballpark figure for an average airplane? Without having spent a dime on this project so far, my "druthers" are to build an RV-6 with an O-360 and constant speed prop (brand new, of course), full IFR, electric trim, and any other bells & whistles. I'm thinking around $40,000...about right? 3. How long are people taking to REALLY build their airplanes? Van's is saying about 2.5 years for working folks with families...if this is right, about how much time per day/week are you putting in? Do you still have a family life? Can my 15 year old son and 7 year old daughter participate? (The real question is, will my wife WANT to play?) 4. How tough is it REALLY to build this thing? As an A-10 pilot, I know a lot of our maintenance guys who do sheet metal and electrical work who might be willing to help me out, but can a guy who can flail around the house realistically build an airplane? Any responses are welcome...you guys are my inspiration. Jim ________________________________________________________________________________
From: KHarrill(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 02, 1995
Subject: PRIMERS
I hope to finish the empennage of my RV - 6 project in the next couple of months. So far I have used Sherwin - Williams wash primer on the interior structure. It occurs to me that there may be a better primer to use on the wing spars. Any suggestions and/or information will be appreciated!!! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Graves <mgraves(at)ptdcs2.intel.com>
Subject: How Did You Do It?
Date: Aug 02, 1995
Jim writes: > 1. How did you RV'ers talk your spouses into this whole thing? Mine is VERY > anti-RV right now; her [most printable] quote was, "This is the dumbest idea > you've ever come up with!" Someone once told me that pilot's second wives like airplanes. (don't tell her I said that). > 3. How long are people taking to REALLY build their airplanes? Van's is > saying about 2.5 years for working folks with families...if this is right, > about how much time per day/week are you putting in? Do you still have a > family life? Can my 15 year old son and 7 year old daughter participate? > (The real question is, will my wife WANT to play?) According to my calculations, if you were to spend 8 hours on a saturday every week and stay out of the shop during the weekdays, that would rack up 416 hours per year. Since the time estimate from Van's is 2000 ~ hours, you will spend about 5 years. Ken Scott from Van's once told me that 5 years of your life will go by anyway. What will you have to show for it? a) beer, tv, & frozen food, or b) a homebuilt, handcrafted airplane. If you can afford to do this and you have the guts to tackle a huge project and the humility to ask for help, then you can do this. Good luck Mike Graves ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 02, 1995
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: Re: How Did You Do It?
> > 1. How did you RV'ers talk your spouses into this whole thing? Mine is VERY > anti-RV right now; her [most printable] quote was, "This is the dumbest idea > you've ever come up with!" I think education is the only answer. Most people seem to have a really skewed idea of what aviation is about, not to mention homebuilts. I've seen that "this guy's REALLY crazy" look so many times now that I often actually avoid mentioning that I'm building an airplane a lot of the time even when the topic of conversation is flying. Most people just don't realize what you can do with a personal, high-performance airplane, not to mention the skills you acquire and personal achievement of building one yourself. Face it, the first thing most people think of when you talk about building your own plane is of this nut in his garage slapping together some bamboo, cloth, bailing wire and a lawnmower engine and rolling it off the roof of a barn. Somehow you have to convince her that what you are building will in fact be a REAL airplane, and one that can get you _and_ her to strange, exciting, far-away places. I hope you do get her to sign on, otherwise either your marriage or the RV will be doomed from the start. > > 2. What is a ballpark figure for an average airplane? Without having spent a > dime on this project so far, my "druthers" are to build an RV-6 with an O-360 > and constant speed prop (brand new, of course), full IFR, electric trim, and > any other bells & whistles. I'm thinking around $40,000...about right? Airframe kit: $11,000 New O-360: 18,000 C/S Prop/gov: 4,000 Tools: 2,000 -------- 35,000 That's with no paint, avionics, instruments, plumbing, wiring, or fancy IFR gear. I'd make it more like $45-50k if you're set on new engine & "full IFR". > 3. How long are people taking to REALLY build their airplanes? Van's is > saying about 2.5 years for working folks with families...if this is right, > about how much time per day/week are you putting in? Do you still have a > family life? Can my 15 year old son and 7 year old daughter participate? > (The real question is, will my wife WANT to play?) I'm 2.5 years into it and pretty much finished with just the wings and tail. Going a lot slower than I'd hoped, and I don't have kids, but I do have an active "family life" with my wife. And unfortunately although she is supportive of the project she really isn't much help in the shop. I think it depends on what else you have going. If I didn't have a yard and house to keep up, and didn't mind not flying ever until my plane was done, and only put in 40 hour weeks at work, and was willing to spring for pre-build spars and such, then it'd be a lot easier to get it done and still have some time left over for the family. The 15 year old son could be a BIG help -- get him excited about it and you'll get done a LOT faster I'll bet. Your daughter might be able to help too if you can teach her to deburr, but unfortunately my experience with 7 year olds is their attention span isn't long, and deburring is pretty tedious. > 4. How tough is it REALLY to build this thing? As an A-10 pilot, I know a > lot of our maintenance guys who do sheet metal and electrical work who might > be willing to help me out, but can a guy who can flail around the house > realistically build an airplane? Can you learn? Do you like tools? Do you have PATIENCE? Do you think you would ENJOY spending hours and hours and hours in your garage working on the thing as opposed to just wanting to fly it? If the answer is "all of the above", then yes you can do it. Randall Henderson RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 02, 1995
rv-list(at)matronics.com
From: ammeterj(at)ammeterj.seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re: How Did You Do It?
I'll try to address your questions; bear in mind these opinions are worth what you pay for them. wrote: >I have a bunch of questions regarding this whole process; I'm getting closer >than ever to making the big jump, but I probably still need the answers to >these questions. (This is the first of many lists you'll see from >me...sorry.) > >1. How did you RV'ers talk your spouses into this whole thing? Mine is VERY >anti-RV right now; her [most printable] quote was, "This is the dumbest idea >you've ever come up with!" > Don't try "If you REALLY loved me you would let me build this airplane". Guaranteed to really piss her off. On a more practical note; mention the fact you'll be home a lot more (while building). Also, make darn sure all the Honey do's are done. >2. What is a ballpark figure for an average airplane? Without having spent a >dime on this project so far, my "druthers" are to build an RV-6 with an O-360 >and constant speed prop (brand new, of course), full IFR, electric trim, and >any other bells & whistles. I'm thinking around $40,000...about right? > I built an RV-6 with a decent VFR panel, a used engine that cost $3500, fixed pitch wood prop. It cost me about $26,000 including $2500 for a 5 foot paint job. I think that $40,000 will build a really good VFR aircraft but IFR may be somewhat more cost. The engine, prop, governor and kit will cost about $31,000 alone if purchased new; leaves only $9,000 for avionics, instruments, lord mounts, battery, paint, upholstery, spinner, controls, wiring, etc. Don't think you can build it for $40,000. 3. How long are people taking to REALLY build their airplanes? Van's is >saying about 2.5 years for working folks with families...if this is right, >about how much time per day/week are you putting in? Do you still have a >family life? Can my 15 year old son and 7 year old daughter participate? >(The real question is, will my wife WANT to play?) > I took 3 1/2 years building 2 to 4 nights a week (3 hours each) and one day on the weekend. The other day was my wife's day. I also would drop whatever (unless breakable) I was doing whenever she came down to the shop/garage and asked me to help her with whatever. I think that is why she supported me in the RV building and flying. Can your kids participate? Absolutely, in fact, they will probably end up your best helpers and fan club. >4. How tough is it REALLY to build this thing? As an A-10 pilot, I know a >lot of our maintenance guys who do sheet metal and electrical work who might >be willing to help me out, but can a guy who can flail around the house >realistically build an airplane? I used to say that if you could crush a beer can without cutting yourself that you could build an RV. My past experience with aluminum was limited to pretty much that same beer can. I had worked in wood and am an electrician by trade so can read a blueprint/diagram. It will be challenging but, if you can follow instructions and be willing to learn, your RV will take flight. John Ammeter RV-6 N16JA > >Any responses are welcome...you guys are my inspiration. > >Jim > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JamesCone(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 02, 1995
Subject: Re: Marhyde Single Stage Self Etching Primer
Available at a 20% discount from: SMG Sales 155 Weldon Parkway, Suite 107 St. Louis, MO 63043 (314) 569-1196 (800) 729-1243 Jim Cone ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JamesCone(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 02, 1995
Subject: Re: RV-Listers
James Cone St. Charles, MO jamescone(at)aol.com RV-6A 22929 N929JC TAIL, WINGS, & FUSELAGE COMPLED. WORKING ON FINISHING KIT. FULL IFR PANEL, O-320E2D 160HP, MICRO MONITOR ENGINE INSTRUMENT SYSTEM, ELLISON THROTTLE BODY, SKY-TECH STARTER, PELICAN 65 AMP ALTERNATOR, SENSENICH FIXED PITCH PROP, SLIDER CANOPY, ELECTRIC FLAPS, ELECTRIC TRIM, MANUAL AILERON TRIM, SELF DESIGNED MANUAL RUDDER TRIM. HOPE TO BE FLYING NEXT YEAR. AIRLINE CAPTAIN FOR TWA. RETIRED LT. COL. USAF PILOT. AVIATION NEWSPAPER COLUMNIST. EDITOR OF VAN'S AIR FORCE, TRI-STATE WING NEWSLETTER. COMPLETED AND FLEW A SEA HAWKER COMPOSITE AMPHIBIAN THAT HAS SINCE BEEN SOLD. EAA FLIGHT ADVISOR FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE AIRCRAFT. VICE PRESIDENT OF EAA CHAPTER 32, ST. LOUIS, MO. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JamesCone(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 03, 1995
Subject: Re: tools
Stick with Sears. You will pay a bit more but you will be much happier with the results. Don't buy cheap tools. You will end up replacing them with good ones later at a much higher total cost than if you just got the good ones to start with. Jim Cone, Owner of nearly every power tool Sears ever made, and very happy with them. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JamesCone(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 03, 1995
Subject: Re: Firewall/Engine mount
I also had the tooling holes in the wrong place. Mine were about 2" too high and much too wide. I called Van's and Bill Benedict said to put a screw in the holes to plug them. The idea is to center the engine mount on the firewall. The dimensions are on the plans and they are correct. If you drill one bottom hole and mount the engine mount with one bolt in that hole, you can drill the other holes using the engine mount to drill through so that the holes line up exactly. Jim Cone ________________________________________________________________________________ (Soft*Switch Central V4L380P5) id 310713080095215FAOPARI;
Date: Aug 03, 1995
From: "NMARSHAL" <NMARSHAL(at)AOPARI.remnet.rockwell.com>
Subject: NOTE 08/03/95 15:06:00
subscribe nmarshal ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 03, 1995
From: "Gregg L. Sloan" <gsloan(at)CapAccess.org>
Subject: Re: How Did You Do It?
On Wed, 2 Aug 1995 wrb.afres.af.mil!Jim=Preston%10AF%AFRESEM(at)matronics.com wrote: > > 1. How did you RV'ers talk your spouses into this whole thing? Mine is VERY > anti-RV right now; her [most printable] quote was, "This is the dumbest idea > you've ever come up with!" This can be a big problem. You've got to change her thinking. You might study her interests and see if you can blend them to building and flying the RV. In my case, my wife is in to crafts and quilting. So she can appreciate building and creating things. We also plan to use the RV to travel to quilt shows around the country (that was a big seller). It's important to have your wife on your side, otherwise there may be trouble ahead. Have your wife email my wife. Maybe mine can offer some encouragement. Her name is Pat, email her at psloan(at)capaccess.org good luck Gregg Sloan_____gsloan(at)capaccess.org_____Herndon, Virginia__USA RV-6A #22425 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 03, 1995
From: csanchez(at)BayNetworks.com (Cheryl Sanchez)
Subject: RE: PRIMER
> > I hope to finish the empennage of my RV - 6 project in the next couple >of months. So far I have used Sherwin - Williams wash primer on the interior >structure. It occurs to me that there may be a better primer to use on the >wing spars. Any suggestions and/or information will be appreciated!!! > I also used the Sherwin Williams wash primer on the tail of my RV-3. When I was building the spars I wanted to do the alumiprep and alodyne in addition to the primer. The Sherwin Williams product said it was not to be used over alodyned aluminum. I turns out the the Dupont Veriprime is ok over alumiprep/alodyne. So I used it for my spars. Both are good primers although I think it is easier to get an even and thin coating with the Sherwin Williams primer. Cheryl Sanchez ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 03, 1995
From: ecole(at)ix.netcom.com (EDWARD COLE )
Subject: New Guy on the Block
First with the formalities: Ed Cole 10565 E. Estates Dr. Cupertino, CA 95014 408-257-3281 H 408-737-7600 x6605 W I am a Test Engineer with Maxim Integrated Products. I recently purchased the preview plans for the RV-6 and plan to start around Thanksgiving time. I have a fellow Cupertino friend who will also be starting an RV-6 soon. AT the present time I'm collecting tool catalogs and absorbing as much RV email, data, etc. that I can find. I've made contact with 2 builders so far. To start with, what is the rivet gun of choice?? 2x or 3x ??? Also, will a 3.5hp compressor with an 11 gal. tank do the job?? 6 scfm at 90 psi. Most importantly, is there anyone out there in a 50 mile radius of San Jose who is currently flying an RV6 that would allow me to look at the finshed product and possibly take me up for a ride??? I'll buy all the gas plus lunch !!!!! And last of all, is there any events that might feature the rv's coming up in the near future??? Any builder groups in the San Francisco Bay area??? Ok, enough questions....I'm off Ed Cole ecole(at)ix.netcom.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 03, 1995
From: rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com (Ross Mickey )
Subject: Fwd: How Did You Do It?
Subject: How Did You Do It? There have been a lot of good comments regarding this meaasage but I might as well throw in my two cents worth. 1. How did you RV'ers talk your spouses into this whole thing? Mine is VERY anti-RV right now; her [most printable] quote was, "This is the dumbest idea you've ever come up with!" My wife was also very negative. I'm not sure what happened to change it. I remained excited about the project and then one day we went over the money we had in our savings. We essentially split the money up, she bought $3,000 worth of new sewing equiptment and I bought my tail kit. I have worked on the project mainly between 5 am and 7 am, before my wife, 2 year old and 7 year old walk up or between 10 pm and 12 pm, after they are asleep and anytime during the weekend where I can slip it in. The two kids make life very busy as you know. I still get sniped at when she is grumpy but it passes. 3. How long are people taking to REALLY build their airplanes? Van's is saying about 2.5 years for working folks with families...if this is right, about how much time per day/week are you putting in? Do you still have a family life? Can my 15 year old son and 7 year old daughter participate? (The real question is, will my wife WANT to play?) I bought my tail kit Nov 1993. It took 1 1/2 years for me to do the tail and wings. I have always set a timeframe of 5-7 years so I don't set myself up for letdowns or conflicts with family. I have promised myself that I woun't have to find a "second wife who likes flyong." 4. How tough is it REALLY to build this thing? As an A-10 pilot, I know a lot of our maintenance guys who do sheet metal and electrical work who might be willing to help me out, but can a guy who can flail around the house realistically build an airplane? Any responses are welcome...you guys are my inspiration. Jim You spend alot of time stewing over how things go together and some time cursing your mistakes but for the mostpart it is very straightforward. Good luck!!!!! Ross Mickey Bulkhead 605 (another jigsaw puzzle "now where is that piece of 2 3/4 X3 1/2 .032 I use for the spice plate@#*@#@&@#@!!!!!) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 03, 1995
From: ecole(at)ix.netcom.com (EDWARD COLE )
Subject: Fwd: New Guy on the Block
---- Begin Forwarded Message (8.6.12/SMI-4.1/Netcom) (8.6.12/SMI-4.1) (8.6.12/SMI-4.1) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 1995 08:50:51 -0700 From: ix.netcom.com!ecole(at)matronics.com (EDWARD COLE ) Subject: New Guy on the Block First with the formalities: Ed Cole 10565 E. Estates Dr. Cupertino, CA 95014 408-257-3281 H 408-737-7600 x6605 W I am a Test Engineer with Maxim Integrated Products. I recently purchased the preview plans for the RV-6 and plan to start around Thanksgiving time. I have a fellow Cupertino friend who will also be starting an RV-6 soon. AT the present time I'm collecting tool catalogs and absorbing as much RV email, data, etc. that I can find. I've made contact with 2 builders so far. To start with, what is the rivet gun of choice?? 2x or 3x ??? Also, will a 3.5hp compressor with an 11 gal. tank do the job?? 6 scfm at 90 psi. Most importantly, is there anyone out there in a 50 mile radius of San Jose who is currently flying an RV6 that would allow me to look at the finshed product and possibly take me up for a ride??? I'll buy all the gas plus lunch !!!!! And last of all, is there any events that might feature the rv's coming up in the near future??? Any builder groups in the San Francisco Bay area??? Ok, enough questions....I'm off Ed Cole ecole(at)ix.netcom.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dierks(at)austin.ibm.com
Subject: New Guy on the Block (fwd)
Date: Aug 03, 1995
A 2HP compressor has worked fine for me. May be on the ragged edge to paint the entire aircraft but I will paint it in pieces anyway. The riveting uses very little air. The air drill is what sucks the air. Any die grinders use the most air but you don't use that much (cutting canopy, etc). I used the 2X gun for my RV4 as recommended by Sid Golden. Herman > > To start with, what is the rivet gun of choice?? 2x or 3x ??? > Also, will a 3.5hp compressor with an 11 gal. tank do the job?? > 6 scfm at 90 psi. > Herman Dierks, Dept. E54S, AWSD Austin, Texas mail: dierks(at)austin.ibm.com VM: DIERKS at AUSVM6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 03, 1995
From: Don Wentz <Don_Wentz(at)ccm2.hf.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Craftsmanship
Jim, I wouldn't be discouraged by the quality of the RVs at Oshkosh, and whether yours could 'measure-up'. I know that sometimes I start thinking that mine is capable of winning a prize, then go someplace like that and realize how tough the competition is! There are lots of excellent examples of the breed there, and I have in fact heard builders shy away from parking there because of that. Point is, the fact that you built it yourself and it is a solid safe airplane should be #1 priority. If you get carried-away and make it real nice, oh well. Be aware that usually the 2nd airplane or the retiree's airplane tends to be the stand-out unit, as us working stiffs with kids building our first sometimes have a tougher time of doing a 'showplane' job. Build it quickly, build it light, then fly the heck out of it! Build your showplane in another life.... BTW, Van's has a heck of a long ways to go before an RV will be "snap together"!!!!! There's plenty of fun left. I think the main next improvement would be assistance in aligning spar to spar, and control surface mount locations. Don 'The Duck' Wentz, N790DW, 180HP RV-6, #20369 Don, Re your last concerning the amount of time guys will spend on their projects versus what they get out of it...I think you made some excellent points. I agree that you can spend hours, if not days, trying to make that joint fit to 1/64" instead of 1/32 or even 1/16. At the Oshkosh Skystruck seminar, Ken Scott said that the airplane doesn't know the difference between 1/32" or 1/16". Would it be worth the added aggravation for something that most people might glance at and say, "Nice work..." as they wander over to look at the next guy's machine. I'm not belittling the people who DO get intense pride at those things...heck, I admire them, but I'm not the like purist who left a post a couple of weeks ago saying that Van was taking the fun out of this by pre-punching skins, etc. At what point will the purist say that "we're just assembling parts instead of creating an airplane"? I'll bet this guy doesn't make his own aluminum out of bauxite, either. No, your message wasn't condescending...I appreciate the sentiments. I'd rather spend that time in the air or with my family than sweating out measuring gaps with a micrometer. Thanks for the encouragement. Jim ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Graves <mgraves(at)ptdcs2.intel.com>
Subject: Oshkosh
Date: Aug 03, 1995
guys, Are there any "listers" that went to Oshkosh this year? I believe there are some of us who are curious to know how it went. Mike Graves RV-6A in box on closet shelf. Thoughts turn toward tools... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: John Cocker <jcocker(at)frontier.canrem.com>
Subject: Painting
Date: Aug 03, 1995
I am not at the painting stage, yet, bit as the wings and empannage are just being stored. Is it realistic to paint the RV in stages ? For example the wings are much easier to paint while the surfaces can be vertical. They could be primed and painted and left for trim till final assembly. Any ideas on this ? Meanwhile I am busy looking for a 360, any leads would be welcome. John ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 03, 1995
From: "David A. Barnhart" <barnhart(at)crl.com>
Subject: Trimming skin overlap aft of rear spar
A couple of months ago there was some discussoin on this list on this subject. While the construction manual describes trimming the top skins aft of the rear spar where they overlap so as to change the overlap joint to an unsupported but joint, there was no mention of doing this for the bottom skins. Today I talked to VAN HIMSELF! and he said there is no need to trim the bottom skins in this manner. (He said you could, but there was no need to.) Best Regards, Dave Barnhart rv-6 sn 23744 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JerryFlyRV(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 03, 1995
Subject: Re: North Plains Coordinates
>RVer's >I would like someone to post the latitude/longitude coordinates for the North >Plains airport. Someone must have entered them in his or her GPS. Then= , I >won't have to strain my eyes looking at the Seattle Sectional figuring i= t out >myself. There seems to be several private strips within a few miles of = each >other near HIO. I want to fly down to the potluck in Sept., weather >permitting. >Thanx, >RGWELCH = RG Not sure if anyone responded to your quary about North Plains coordinates= if not here they are. N45=B0 35.5' W123=B0 00.6' If you were to fly to HIO and then follow the heading of runway 30 you wo= uld find Sunset about 5mi on that heading (30) from HIO. Hope this helps Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS Hillsboro,OR ________________________________________________________________________________
From: teleport.com!auer(at)matronics.com (Teleport.com!auer(at)matronics.com)
Subject: rv8
Date: Jul 30, 1995
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 95 08:22:49 -0500 From: "Dell M. Auer" <teleport.com!auer(at)matronics.com> -- [ From: Dell M. Auer * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] -- Greetings Gang Does any one know if Van got the hours off of his RV8 and did he make it to OSH. Regards Dell ________________________________________________________________________________
From: solar.sky.net!kvap(at)matronics.com (Solar.sky.net!kvap(at)matronics.com)
Subject: Re: Re: rv8
Date: Jul 30, 1995
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 95 19:47:44 -0600 From: "Kevin E. Vap" <solar.sky.net!kvap(at)matronics.com> -- [ From: Kevin E. Vap * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] -- >Date: Sunday, 30-Jul-95 08:22 AM >From: Dell M. Auer \ Internet: (teleport.com!auer@matronics. com) >Subject: rv8 >Greetings Gang >Does any one know if Van got the hours off of his RV8 and did he make >it to OSH. >Regards >Dell I just got back this morning (Sunday @6:00 am after a 10 hour drive during the night). Yes, the RV-8 was at the show (at the booth). It looked pretty good (more room, bigger panel over the -4). I'll let the RV-4 experts describe it better when they get back. -Kevin Vap "RV-6" kvap@sky.net http://www.sky.net/~kvap ________________________________________________________________________________
From: luis.madsen(at)tclbbs.com (Luis Madsen)
Subject: Superior Air Parts fax number ?
Date: Jul 31, 1995
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 1995 11:06:13 GMT From: ibm.net!luism(at)matronics.com (Luis Madsen) Subject: Superior Air Parts fax number ? Could anybody please help me with the fax number to Superior Air Parts? What I have is the address: 14280 Gillis Road, Dallas, Texas 75244-3792; phone 800/299-5802. This does not help me, as I can not dial a 800 number from Denmark. Have any of you experience with the service and parts quality from them. Luis Madsen, Denmark luism(at)ibm.net RV6 60% luism(at)ibm.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ken.gray(at)tclbbs.com (Ken Gray)
Subject: Who are we
Date: Jul 31, 1995
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 1995 22:45:33 -0500 From: bihs.net!klgray(at)matronics.com (Ken Gray) Subject: Who are we Ken Gray Bryan, Texas RV6 SN: 23069 Almost done with finish kit. Setting it up for IFR, 0320 E2D, Fixed pitch. Started October 1993 expect first flight December 95. N number applied for. ________________________________________________________________________________ (Soft*Switch Central V4L380P5) id 844528000095216FAOPARI;
Date: Aug 04, 1995
From: "NMARSHAL" <NMARSHAL(at)AOPARI.remnet.rockwell.com>
Subject: NOTE 08/04/95 07:19:00
subscribe nmarshal(at)aopari.remnet.rockwell.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dick Steffens" <res6246(at)des.dukepower.com>
Subject: Wing Tips
Date: Aug 04, 1995
Sometime ago I heard someone say that someone would have some new wing tips at Oshkosh. Something about them coming from some testing program. Anything to this? Dick Steffens RV-6 Sticking together the tanks res6246(at)des.dukepower.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 04, 1995
From: Frank K Justice <Frank_K_Justice(at)ccm.ssd.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Firewall cutting
>(I've been told by some to >place the flanges on the engine side rather than hiding them between >the firewall and angle. Any comments????) It is more difficult to do a good job riveting the box and stiffeners on with the box behind the firewall because its flanges distort everything. Do not rivet the box on until much later when you have attached the center rudder pedal support to the stiffener next to the box. FKJ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 04, 1995
From: jem(at)crl.nmsu.edu (Jim McDonald)
Subject: Wing skins
I just committed what appears to be a major screw-up. I drilled the bottom outboard (28 7/17" wide) skin to the top outboard side (28 11/16). I didn't notice the differences until I started to drill the inboard skin. I don't think there is anything I can do except replace the skin (I haven't called Van's yet), but I'm not sure how they would ship a single skin (unless I just went ahead and ordered by fuselage kit at the same time). I read about single-piece top skins the in Justice instructions and might just do that given my situation. He said Van's won't ship them single-piece top skins. Where can I get them? (i.e., will anyone ship them?) Thanks, Jim ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 04, 1995
From: <Jim=Preston%10AF%AFRESEM(at)wrb.afres.af.mil> (Maj, 303FS, Whiteman AFB, MO,
DSN 975-3620 or 3489)
Subject: How Do You Do It, Part II
To all the folks who answered my first post, thanks a lot for the thoughtful responses...to summarize, just about everybody thinks the project is doable, that the wife needs to at least not actively oppose it, if not wholeheartedly support it, and the kids can be a big help, both emotionally and physically. That's great, but now brings up another of the wife's objections: why build a 2-place aircraft when you have a wife and kids? Mine are 15 and 7...now maybe the 15 year old will be in college when I'm done with this thing, but it'll be tough taking the wife and at that time 12 year old daughter on any of these weekend getaways. Any good answers? (Mine sure as heck haven't been good enough!) Different subject: Oshkosh - to Mike Graves: Yes, I was there, but only for the first official day, Thursday. I hung around the Van's booth, bothering all of them and talking with Steve Barnard, Van, Ken Scott, and Jerry & Judy VanGrunsven. I also drooled on most of the RVs parked in the show area. (Sorry, Redbird!) I'd never been there before, but I've gotta go back! A very intense experience...I camped, and that was not a bad way to do it, except that not having an electrical plug-in ruined my plan for air conditioning. It did get hot out there! The flying was great, Van's had a bunch of folks signed up for demo rides, but I'll wait until things are a little more relaxed, and I can spend some quality time really flying the airplane. All in all, a great experience, and one I hope to repeat someday. To Don Wentz: if I can get an A-10 up to Portland someday, I'll show you mine if you show me yours! Jim ________________________________________________________________________________
From: TommyLewis(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 04, 1995
Subject: comments on Oshkosh
guys, Are there any "listers" that went to Oshkosh this year? I believe there are some of us who are curious to know how it went. Mike Graves ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------- My wife and I made our annual trip to Oshkosh last week in our Cessna 182. Went in on Tuesday, left on Sunday. As usual, lot's of nice airplanes. The RVs had a bigger space on the flight line than previous years, and it was full with other RVs spread throughout the flight line. Some real nice machines, one new unpainted one, couple for sale. Australian RV 4 was there, he was very active in talking to people on flightline. We attended Van's tent seminar on Sat on RV 6s, lots of questions, mostly "old" stuff for new potential builders. As stated by others, RV 8 was there and got lots of attention. Since Van had not completed testing, were very "uncommitted" as to specs. Pretty much the usual conservative approach as we have all seen from Van, and I do not fault him at all in this case. Some other manufactures would have been accepting orders. Van's booth was very busy every time I went by or stopped. Lot's of builders with projects were talking about options. We did not attend Sunday night banquet as we headed home. Handheld GPSs were selling well, I bought the Garmin 90 unit, real nice on flight home. Tom Lewis - RV6a project, wings in jigs, working on first flap in N. Dallas TommyLewis(at)AOM.COM ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 04, 1995
From: gil(at)rassp.hac.com (Gil Alexander)
Subject: Re: Wing Tips
>Sometime ago I heard someone say that someone would have some new wing tips at >Oshkosh. Something about them coming from some testing program. Anything to >this? >Dick Steffens >RV-6 Sticking together the tanks >res6246(at)des.dukepower.com Yes, ... it was Steve Barnard of BAC. He had one (yes, only one) on his 1994 award winning RV6A. His tests are not yet complete, so he said wait a few months for more details. His computer generated pressure distribution plots looked interesting, and his tips may be coupled with a root fairing that is convex instead of the usual concave (like a Spitfire). I guess it's just wait and see ..... Gil Alexander, RV6A, #20701 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 04, 1995
From: Chris Ruble <cruble(at)cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Wing skins
> > I read about single-piece top skins the in Justice instructions and might > just do that given my situation. He said Van's won't ship them > single-piece top skins. Where can I get them? (i.e., will anyone ship > them?) > > Thanks, > > Jim > I bought my material from a place call (I think) AirParts. Their add is in the back of Sport Aviation. It's the one with the lady that has been standing in a roll of alclad for the last 25 years or so. I'm sure you've seen the add. They are great people to work with. Give 'em a try. Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 04, 1995
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: Re: New Guy on the Block
> > To start with, what is the rivet gun of choice?? 2x or 3x ??? > Also, will a 3.5hp compressor with an 11 gal. tank do the job?? > 6 scfm at 90 psi. 2x/3x seems to be a matter of personal preference. I prefer the 2x as it's smaller size makes it easier to control with one hand. I haven't found it to be lacking in hitting power up to the larger 1/8" rivets on the RV. I have a 3x gun too but I never use it. Your compressor sounds like it should be adequate. Randall Henderson RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: AROCOMM(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 04, 1995
Subject: Registration Numbers
Can anyone tell me if I have this right? According to AC 20-27D "Certification and Operation of Amateur-Built Aircraft" the following possible registration numbers are legitimate: N1 N11 N111 N11111 N1A N11A N111A N1111A N1AB N11AB N111AB have I got it right? And as I understand it, if the number(s) I want are available I can reserve it for a year for $10, and $10 every year thereafter until registered. Do you automatically get to reserve that number, or must you submit another search request? Thanks Noel ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 04, 1995
From: "Remi D. Khu" <rkhu(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Trimming skin overlap aft of rear spar
On Thu, 3 Aug 1995, David A. Barnhart wrote: [Snip] > ... While the construction manual describes trimming the top skins > aft of the rear spar where they overlap so as to change the overlap joint > to an unsupported but joint, there was no mention of doing this for the > bottom skins. > > Today I talked to VAN HIMSELF! and he said there is no need to trim > the bottom skins in this manner. (He said you could, but there was > no need to.) Did father Moses also provide any concrete rationale in support of this decisive statement? It appears to me, a non-engineer, that the section in question is not a critical load structure and conceivably be held in place by putty. Ever seen the trailing edge slats flapping on commercial jets? This is not a flame-throw, I'm just anti-hero-worshipping... -- R D Khu rkhu(at)earthlink.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 04, 1995
From: "Remi D. Khu" <rkhu(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Painting
On 3 Aug 1995, John Cocker wrote: > I am not at the painting stage, yet, bit as the wings and empannage are just > being stored. > Is it realistic to paint the RV in stages ? For example the wings are much > easier to paint while the surfaces can be vertical. They could be primed and > painted and left for trim till final assembly. Any ideas on this ? > > Meanwhile I am busy looking for a 360, any leads would be welcome. John > ** An opinion from one who has yet to complete the left wing section... I'm assuming you mean painting the subassemblies _immediately_ prior to the final assembly. The alternative of painting upon completion of the subs. themselves are... IMHO, illogical due to the weathering of time. The likelihood of having a mismatched paint scheme seems inevitable... Back to my initial assumption, there are some negatives to this plan: the real possibility of having the top-coat damaged from the unavoidable handling and fitting. How often is it that a beautiful piece of Al become marred, scratched, even dented by the time it resembles an a/c part? Not the best supportive example but hey... Robert Shapiro I ain't !! The basis of my opinion is based only exposure to building Revel models. Those model airplane glue seems to know exactly when to run onto a painted surface despite masking. Uncle Murphy is alive and well... Presently undecided on this issue, but I'm leaning towards keeping the final coat off the bird until the plane has flown off the required hours. Who knows what evil lurks during that phase? Then I can leisurely mask and spray her without distractions. Thank you for your time in reading this neophyte's rambling thoughts. R D Khu rkhu(at)earthlink.net RV-4 #3751 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CRazer2(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 05, 1995
Subject: For Prospective Builders
For all of you out there contemplating building here is some information you may find helpful. Just finished tail. No flaws, wrinkles or dents or missplaced holes. Had to rebuild trim tab from scratch but am very happy with results. Found a few flaws in prints and manual but after a while you begin to tune into building other than just following the numbers and you begin to understand the process better. Received kit mid April, finished August 5. 385 hours. Cost: 3111.64, includes tools, periodicals, videos, tail kit, primers etc. Already owned grinder, radial arm saw, makita drill, air compressor and various hand tools. Wing kit ordered but informed of 8 week wait. Keep that in mind when you begin building your tail. Need more info, just ask. Chet Razer RV6/6A ? in sparta, Ill ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 04, 1995
From: "Remi D. Khu" <rkhu(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Painting
On 3 Aug 1995, John Cocker wrote: > I am not at the painting stage, yet, bit as the wings and empannage are just > being stored. > Is it realistic to paint the RV in stages ? For example the wings are much > easier to paint while the surfaces can be vertical. They could be primed and > painted and left for trim till final assembly. Any ideas on this ? > > Meanwhile I am busy looking for a 360, any leads would be welcome. John > ** An opinion from one who has yet to complete the left wing section... I'm assuming you mean painting the subassemblies _immediately_ prior to the final assembly. The alternative of painting upon completion of the subs. themselves are... IMHO, illogical due to the weathering of time. The likelihood of having a mismatched paint scheme seems inevitable... Back to my initial assumption, there are some negatives to this plan: the real possibility of having the top-coat damaged from the unavoidable handling and fitting. How often is it that a beautiful piece of Al become marred, scratched, even dented by the time it resembles an a/c part? Not the best supportive example but hey... Robert Shapiro I ain't !! The basis of my opinion is based only exposure to building Revel models. Those model airplane glue seems to know exactly when to run onto a painted surface despite masking. Uncle Murphy is alive and well... Presently undecided on this issue, but I'm leaning towards keeping the final coat off the bird until the plane has flown off the required hours. Who knows what evil lurks during that phase? Then I can leisurely mask and spray her without distractions. Thank you for your time in reading this neophyte's rambling thoughts. R D Khu rkhu(at)earthlink.net RV-4 #3751 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 04, 1995
From: "Remi D. Khu" <rkhu(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Trimming skin overlap aft of rear spar
On Thu, 3 Aug 1995, David A. Barnhart wrote: [Snip] > ... While the construction manual describes trimming the top skins > aft of the rear spar where they overlap so as to change the overlap joint > to an unsupported but joint, there was no mention of doing this for the > bottom skins. > > Today I talked to VAN HIMSELF! and he said there is no need to trim > the bottom skins in this manner. (He said you could, but there was > no need to.) Did father Moses also provide any concrete rationale in support of this decisive statement? It appears to me, a non-engineer, that the section in question is not a critical load structure and conceivably be held in place by putty. Ever seen the trailing edge slats flapping on commercial jets? This is not a flame-throw, I'm just anti-hero-worshipping... -- R D Khu rkhu(at)earthlink.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 05, 1995
From: "Remi D. Khu" <rkhu(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Who are we
Come on guys!!! This is ridiculous.. first of all, these "Who are we" crap is garbage info anyhow. I care about who you are as much as how you concern you're about me. Give me a break guys... The digests are packed as it is... send your stuff to the guy who posted it. He specifically said EMAIL to HIM NOT THE LIST!! Later! rk rkhu(at)earthlink.net PS: Direct your remarks on this TO MY EMAIL!! This list is not the place!! I'll make sure it receives the attn it deserves... your flames and such... > /dev/null! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dierks(at)austin.ibm.com
Subject: Wing skins (fwd)
Date: Aug 05, 1995
You may be able to find aircraft grade AL skins locally. Check with you metal supply houses. For example here in Austin, I have bought 2024T3 alclad in .025 and .032 from Trident. You usually have to buy an entire sheet (4x12ft I think). It was about $75 when I bought a sheet about 3 Yrs ago. It has prob. went up some in price. It is always nice to have some extra around or maybe you can split a half sheet with some other homebuilder (thats what I did) but on a fwd Fuselage skin on RV4. Trident also has large shears and may be able to cut it for you for and extra fee. Otherwise, just roll it up and take it home and cut it. Herman > > I read about single-piece top skins the in Justice instructions and might > just do that given my situation. He said Van's won't ship them > single-piece top skins. Where can I get them? (i.e., will anyone ship > them?) > > Thanks, > > Jim > > Herman Dierks, Dept. E54S, AWSD Austin, Texas mail: dierks(at)austin.ibm.com VM: DIERKS at AUSVM6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dierks(at)austin.ibm.com
Subject: Registration Numbers (fwd)
Date: Aug 05, 1995
I don't think some of your numbers are valid. Here is part of what I posted a few weeks back from the same doc you are referencing: Note that there are rules about N numbers. It can not start with the letters O or I. It may not exceed 5 symbols following the N The symbols may be all numbers (N10000) , one to four numbers and a suffex letter, (N1000U) one to three numbers and two suffix letters (N100AB) The first zero (0) must be preceeded by a number 1-9. Therefore, I think you are violating the rule 'one to four numbers AND a suffex. It would have to be N1A for example and not N1. Yes, $10 then 10.00 per yr until you assign it to a registered AC. or if it expires you start over again. Herman > Subject: Registration Numbers > > Can anyone tell me if I have this right? According to AC 20-27D > "Certification and Operation of Amateur-Built Aircraft" the following > possible registration numbers are legitimate: > > N1 > N11 > N111 > N11111 > N1A > N11A > N111A > N1111A > N1AB > N11AB > N111AB > > have I got it right? > > And as I understand it, if the number(s) I want are available I can reserve > it for a year for $10, and $10 every year thereafter until registered. > > Do you automatically get to reserve that number, or must you submit another > search request? > > Thanks > Noel > -- -------------------------------------------------------- *NOTICE for internet mail*: Any ideas or thoughts expressed here are my own and are independent of my employer. Herman Dierks, Dept. E54S, AWSD Austin, Texas AIX Network Performance Measurement/Analysis phone: TL 678-2831 outside: (512) 838-2831 ZIP: 9632 fax: 512-838-1801 mail: dierks(at)austin.ibm.com VM: DIERKS at AUSVM6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 05, 1995
From: J.Ken_Hitchmough(at)magic.ca (J.Ken Hitchmough)
Subject: Re: Painting
>I am not at the painting stage, yet, bit as the wings and empannage are just >being stored. >Is it realistic to paint the RV in stages ? For example the wings are much >easier to paint while the surfaces can be vertical. They could be primed and >painted and left for trim till final assembly. Any ideas on this ? John, Tony Bengelis did some articles on painting the 'plane. I'll try and dig them out for the next time we meet. Ken -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Magic Online Services Toronto Inc. (416) 591-6490 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: AROCOMM(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 06, 1995
Subject: Fwd: Registration Numbers
(Michael McGee) writes: >the "N1" is spoken for. >Formerlly by an old Coast Guard "brass hauler" and currently by a FAA >aircraft. I was only using the registration numbers as an example of the possible variations. "I" and "O" excepted, of course. Noel --------------------- From: teleport.com!jmpcrftr(at)matronics.com (Michael McGee) Date: 95-08-05 00:57:17 EDT >Can anyone tell me if I have this right? According to AC 20-27D >"Certification and Operation of Amateur-Built Aircraft" the following >possible registration numbers are legitimate: > >N1 >N11 >N111 >N11111 ---snip--- As I recall from an old Flying magazine, the "N1" is spoken for. Formerlly by an old Coast Guard "brass hauler" and currently by a FAA aircraft. Mike Mike McGee & Jackie Stiles jmpcrftr(at)teleport.com RV-6 ..sn 23530.. (in the "plans" still) .. shop almost ready ... SHOP: ++++++---- (It's full of junk from movin' in ..mnph..) TAIL: ---------- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: kksys!showpg!jpl (Joe Larson)
Subject: Re: rv trim
Date: Aug 06, 1995
> > Richard asked if it were possible to make a electronicly controlled > > trim system. > > i definitely think going digital is overkill... > > The best way to make such a system (IMHO) is analog. I'm a bit behind in reading my email, so if someone has already suggested this, I apoligize. I learned to fly in Cessna 152s. The 152s at my FBO, at least, all have a slider switch with detents at 10 and 20 degrees. Full flaps is 30. You move the slider to the appropriate spot, and the flaps go to that spot. My RV *will* have a similar system. As one of the posters explained, when I'm going from 10 degrees to 20 degrees, I have a things that I want to deal with that are a lot more important than making sure I stop the flaps at the desired place. Set the switch and ignore the darned thing. My approach... I was going to steal one off a crashed Cessna. Why reinvent the wheel? Everything we want, all TSO'd and everything, is available for use. You just need to give a call to your favorite aircraft junkyard and ask if they have any 152s or 172s you can steal parts off of. Of course, if someone comes out with a kit of some sort for this, I would consider that, too. Or I might ask a friend of mine who likes to play with this stuff more than I do if he can design one for me. I bet he would get a kick out of it, and I know he'll trade his design time for some flight time in the completed airplane. -Joe -- Joe Larson jpl(at)showpg.mn.org 612-595-9690(w) Showpage Software, Inc. 435 Ford Rd, Suite 315 St. Louis Park, Mn 55426 Future RV-6A pilot. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JerryFlyRV(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 06, 1995
Subject: Re: Trimming skin overlap aft of rear spar
David wrote >> Today I talked to VAN HIMSELF! and he said there is no need to trim >> the bottom skins in this manner. (He said you could, but there was >> no need to.) > Remis' reply >Did father Moses also provide any concrete rationale in support of this >decisive statement? > >It appears to me, a non-engineer, that the section in question is not a >critical load structure and conceivably be held in place by putty. Ever >seen the trailing edge slats flapping on commercial jets? > >This is not a flame-throw, I'm just anti-hero-worshipping... > > -- >R D Khu >rkhu(at)earthlink.net Remi You don't have to be a engineer to figure out why the top is cut and the bottom does not have to be, first the top is cut so there is a smooth surface where the top of the flap meets the bottom of the wing skin, as there is no meeting on the bottom, the bottom wing skins do not need to be cut....... Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JerryFlyRV(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 06, 1995
Subject: Re: Who are we
Remi writes >Come on guys!!! This is ridiculous.. first of all, these "Who are we" >crap is garbage info anyhow. I care about who you are as much as how you >concern you're about me. Give me a break guys... > >The digests are packed as it is... send your stuff to the guy who posted >it. He specifically said EMAIL to HIM NOT THE LIST!! > >Later! > >rk >rkhu(at)earthlink.net > >PS: Direct your remarks on this TO MY EMAIL!! This list is not the place!! > I'll make sure it receives the attn it deserves... your flames and > such... > /dev/null! > > Remi I for one like to know about other builder and don't think it is "*crap*" my suggestion is, if you don't like it get off the list. Most of us do care about the other builders and enjoy the comradeship, I cared enough about you to look you up in Bakersfield two years ago remember? Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS ________________________________________________________________________________
From: jmbrown(at)netcom.netcom.com (John Brown)
Subject: CHANGE OF ADDRESS
Date: Aug 06, 1995
I don't know if this is the correct place to do this or not. Could the list gods change my email address FROM: jmbrown(at)netcom.com thanks ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 07, 1995
From: rfrawley(at)cisco.com
Subject: Re: Who are we
>HI, This info is great..been down under I get see where folks are and what they are doing...it also gives me the chance to make some new friends when I go to the states.. From: aol.com!JerryFlyRV(at)matronics.com >Precedence: bulk >Date: Sun, 6 Aug 1995 15:51:03 -0400 >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: Who are we > > >Remi writes >>Come on guys!!! This is ridiculous.. first of all, these "Who are we" >>crap is garbage info anyhow. I care about who you are as much as how you >>concern you're about me. Give me a break guys... >> >>The digests are packed as it is... send your stuff to the guy who posted >>it. He specifically said EMAIL to HIM NOT THE LIST!! >> >>Later! >> >>rk >>rkhu(at)earthlink.net >> >>PS: Direct your remarks on this TO MY EMAIL!! This list is not the place!! >> I'll make sure it receives the attn it deserves... your flames and >> such... > /dev/null! >> >> > >Remi >I for one like to know about other builder and don't think it is "*crap*" my >suggestion is, if you don't like it get off the list. Most of us do care >about the other builders and enjoy the comradeship, I cared enough about you >to look you up in Bakersfield two years ago remember? > >Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS Regards Richard Frawley Cisco Systems Australia ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Richard Frawley | | | Mgr, Strategic Opportunities | || || * * * | | Phone: 61-2-935-4123 | || || - * | | | * - | | Mobile: 61-18-260-594 | |||| |||| |o|*| | | | |*|o| | | Fax: 61-2-957-4077 | ..:||||||:..:||||||:..| |===========| | | | Email:rfrawley(at)cisco.com | cisco Systems Australia | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pager on 61-2-430-6381...leave a message with your number to call.. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 06, 1995
From: "Remi D. Khu" <rkhu(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Trimming skin overlap aft of rear spar
On Sun, 6 Aug 1995 aol.com!JerryFlyRV(at)matronics.com wrote: > > David wrote > > >> Today I talked to VAN HIMSELF! and he said there is no need to trim > >> the bottom skins in this manner. (He said you could, but there was > >> no need to.) > > > Remis' reply > > >Did father Moses also provide any concrete rationale in support of this > >decisive statement? > > > >It appears to me, a non-engineer, that the section in question is not a > >critical load structure and conceivably be held in place by putty. Ever > >seen the trailing edge slats flapping on commercial jets? > > > >This is not a flame-throw, I'm just anti-hero-worshipping... > > > > -- > >R D Khu > >rkhu(at)earthlink.net > > Remi > You don't have to be a engineer to figure out why the top is cut and the > bottom does not have to be, first the top is cut so there is a smooth surface > where the top of the flap meets the bottom of the wing skin, as there is no > meeting on the bottom, the bottom wing skins do not need to be cut....... > Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS > Jerry, Maybe you might want to re-read my post better... cuz your reply has nothing to do with my comments. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 06, 1995
From: "Remi D. Khu" <rkhu(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Who are we
On Sun, 6 Aug 1995 aol.com!JerryFlyRV(at)matronics.com wrote: > > Remi writes > >Come on guys!!! This is ridiculous.. first of all, these "Who are we" > >crap is garbage info anyhow. I care about who you are as much as how you > >concern you're about me. Give me a break guys... > > > >The digests are packed as it is... send your stuff to the guy who posted > >it. He specifically said EMAIL to HIM NOT THE LIST!! > > > >Later! > > > >rk > >rkhu(at)earthlink.net > > > >PS: Direct your remarks on this TO MY EMAIL!! This list is not the place!! > > I'll make sure it receives the attn it deserves... your flames and > > such... > /dev/null! > > > > > > Remi > I for one like to know about other builder and don't think it is "*crap*" my > suggestion is, if you don't like it get off the list. Most of us do care > about the other builders and enjoy the comradeship, I cared enough about you > to look you up in Bakersfield two years ago remember? > > Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS > Jerry, Since you demonstrated your caring concern and have extended yourself so graciously "two years ago", how about showing the same concern towards the already saturated network bandwidth from superfluous exchanges like we are currently engaged in. Besides.. the original poster explicitly request that such replies are 'DIRECTED TO HIS EMAIL'. Spare me the CRAP Jerry, every lister knows about you and your "3rd customer built RV-6" and your other attributes... One more thing, since when are you the duly elected to speak for the masses? While I'm at it, please read the words... not the blank areas. I will entertain any replies you have in email... that's privately if you can understand that concept. Let's spare the rest of the other folks the ensuing garbage that will occur from this exchange. Until next time... fire away!! Remi rkhu(at)earthlink.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 06, 1995
From: J.Ken_Hitchmough(at)magic.ca (J.Ken Hitchmough)
Subject: To Austin in Vancouver
Hi Austin, Send me your email address and I'll send you the name of the guy. Ken j.ken_hitchmough(at)magic.com -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Magic Online Services Toronto Inc. (416) 591-6490 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JerryFlyRV(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 06, 1995
Subject: Re: Who are we
>One more thing, since when are you the duly elected to speak for the masses? >While I'm at it, please read the words... not the blank areas. I will >entertain any replies you have in email... that's privately if you can >understand that concept. Let's spare the rest of the other folks the >ensuing garbage that will occur from this exchange. >Until next time... fire away!! >Remi >rkhu(at)earthlink.net Your right Remi I don't speak for the masses and this will be the end of it in public. Sorry if I offened anyone in my response to Remi Khu. Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS (Going back to flying my RV-6) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 06, 1995
From: "Remi D. Khu" <rkhu(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Who are we
On Mon, 7 Aug 1995 cisco.com!rfrawley(at)matronics.com wrote: > >HI, > > > This info is great..been down under I get see where folks are and what they > are doing...it also gives me the chance to make some new friends when I go > to the states.. I don't think it's a bad idea either... I think the initial idea is to GATHER the data by one individual (the original poster) for later dissemination of a LIST. That concept is simple yet I still see these sporadic posts of "Who we are" when the compiler expicitly request for them to be sent to his private email address (which he had enclosed not once but TWICE!) THAT... is my contention and gripe. Enough said.. Remi rkhu(at)earthlink.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Dorothy.Brecheisen(at)uni.edu
Date: Aug 06, 1995
Subject:
Please remover me from the RV-List. Thanks. My address is Brecheisen(at)UNI.EDU. wspplPLEAA ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 07, 1995
From: "Gregg L. Sloan" <gsloan(at)CapAccess.org>
Subject: Take it easy
Just a friendly reminder: People on this list are generally polite and well-meaning. Most questions and comments are sincere and honest. When replies using comments like "father Moses" "This is not a flame-throw, I'm just anti-hero-worshipping.." and "Who are we crap is garbage" are used, it does not usually make the writer very popular. Many people (myself included) are offended by such condescending and derogatory remarks. Most people are on this list to learn anything they can about RVs; this is what the list is for. I learn somthing from almost every post. Everybody, just ask your questions and make your comments in a civilized way and take it easy. And remember what this list is really about: RVs..RVs..RVs..RVs. Gregg Sloan_____gsloan(at)capaccess.org_____Herndon, Virginia__USA RV-6A #22425 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 07, 1995
From: "David A. Barnhart" <barnhart(at)crl.com>
Subject: Re: How Do You Do It, Part II
On Fri, 4 Aug 1995 Jim=Preston%10AF%AFRESEM(at)wrb.afres.af.mil wrote: > That's great, but now brings up another of the wife's objections: why build a > 2-place aircraft when you have a wife and kids? Mine are 15 and 7...now > maybe the 15 year old will be in college when I'm done with this thing, but > it'll be tough taking the wife and at that time 12 year old daughter on any > of these weekend getaways. Any good answers? (Mine sure as heck haven't > been good enough!) It depends upon the type of flying you do. I owned 4-seat airplanes for 10 years and alomost NEVER had anyone in the back seat. In fact, All of my REALLY enjoyable flights have been when I've been alone. You have to decide what you are going to do with the airplane. For me, it was easy, I just reflected upon how I had been using an airplane for the past 10 years. Best Regards, Dave Barnhart rv-6 sn 23744 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 07, 1995
From: "David A. Barnhart" <barnhart(at)crl.com>
Subject: Re: Wing skins
On Fri, 4 Aug 1995, Jim McDonald wrote: > I read about single-piece top skins the in Justice instructions and might > just do that given my situation. He said Van's won't ship them > single-piece top skins. Where can I get them? (i.e., will anyone ship > them?) While I understand that Van's will not ship one-piece skins, I investigated obtaining them locally. The local distributor in the Phoeniz, AZ area is Capitol Metals. I would have to order a 4 x 12 sheet and have it sheared to size. A 4 x 12 sheet of .032 was going to be about $150. Capitol could shear it to size for me, at an additional $20 charge. Actually, shipping a sheet of aluminum is no big deal, you just roll it up. Best Regards, Dave Barnhart RV-6 sn 23744 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 07, 1995
From: "Doug Miner" <dougm(at)qm.WV.TEK.COM>
Subject: Re: Fwd- Registration Number
RE>Fwd: Registration Numbers 8/7/95 9:30 AM I have seen the Nike corporations G2B .. it is painted like a tennis shoe.. (not kidding) and it's tail number is November One Kilo Echo... N1KE word is that the NIKE boys approached the owner of that number and offered him big bucks to part with it... can you imagine? er uhm... that was how many zero's? uh sure... ~!~ D~ (Michael McGee) writes: >the "N1" is spoken for. >Formerlly by an old Coast Guard "brass hauler" and currently by a FAA >aircraft. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 07, 1995
From: david_fried(at)smtpgwy.dehavilland.ca
Subject: Oil pressure fittings
In the excitement that comes with the arrival of a large and expensive bit of hardware, it is possible to get carried away and forget some of the small details. My engine arrived the other month. After fiddling about (grunting, straining, cursing...) for an hour or so it was hanging nicely from it's dynafocal mount. After a brief rest and a short trip to Ken Hitchmough's place we did the same to his engine in a third of the time. The point is that the learning curve does work and that coming in second can be nice. Neither of us remembered that the oil pressure port is located rather close to the upper right engine mount. I went back and read Tony B's article warning of this problem and how it is nearly impossible to get the fitting into place. Almost is the key here. A 90 degree brass fitting with is available from ACS. Once this is in the pressure port a straight restrictor fitting may be threaded into it. This fitting is rather bulky, filing down the corners will ease it past the mount. In Ken's case the threads of the port were cut so that the fitting engaged early and was clear of the mount at the first half turn. I wasn't so lucky. After more sweating and cursing I did solve the problem. Once I figured it out it took just seconds. Loosen the mount bolt, slip a lever between the case and the face of the mount, a little push and it is clear... easy. Just a comment for everyone. Some of the exchanges this last weekend were rather angry. This is a group of enthusiasts communicating to share information and have some fun. Nobody is being paid or judged. The only stupid question is the one that is unasked. Let's lighten up please. David Fried DF-6 dfried(at)dehavilland.ca ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Graves <mgraves(at)ptdcs2.intel.com>
Subject: Re: How Do You Do It, Part II
Date: Aug 07, 1995
Dave Barnhart wrote: > It depends upon the type of flying you do. I owned 4-seat airplanes for > 10 years and alomost NEVER had anyone in the back seat. In fact, All of > my REALLY enjoyable flights have been when I've been alone. You have to > decide what you are going to do with the airplane. For me, it was easy, > I just reflected upon how I had been using an airplane for the past 10 years. > I totally agree. How many times do we *really* take more than one passenger? For those trips where we need the extra room, there are many great FBO's that would like to rent their planes at a (semi)reasonable rate. Until Van makes a four seat airplane (unlikely), We'll have to be content. There are four seat kitplanes available from other vendors but you won't find more performance and fun for the dollar than the Van's RV series. $10,000 is a darn good price considering other airplanes in the same league are asking $20-40,000 just for the airframe alone! See if you can persuade your wife to make some airplane parts with you and let her know how much you enjoy her company. Good luck, Mike Graves RV-6A in box on closet shelf ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 07, 1995
From: gil(at)rassp.hac.com (Gil Alexander)
Subject: Re: Registration Numbers (fwd)
> I don't think some of your numbers are valid. > Here is part of what I posted a few weeks back from the same doc you > are referencing: > Note that there are rules about N numbers. > It can not start with the letters O or I. > It may not exceed 5 symbols following the N > The symbols may be all numbers (N10000) , one to four numbers and a suffex > letter, (N1000U) one to three numbers and two suffix letters (N100AB) > The first zero (0) must be preceeded by a number 1-9. > > Therefore, I think you are violating the rule 'one to four numbers AND > a suffex. It would have to be N1A for example and not N1. Actually N1 is used by the head of the FAA, and was parked near the FBO area at Oshkosh. I have also seen it at Minden NV when the FAA head was taken for a glider ride (around the course during the Hitachi Invitational Contest in the late 80's - some ride, even he barfed!) by Bill Ivans, head of the CIVV(?) (glider section of the FAI). It is a 4 engined Gulfstream jet I believe. Sorry about the CIVV and FAI acronyms, but they are french, and I don't have the english equivalents. I think all of the number below are valid, but I doubt if any are available. Gil Alexander, RV6A, #20701, waiting for N64GA reservation ... > > Yes, $10 then 10.00 per yr until you assign it to a registered AC. > or if it expires you start over again. > Herman > >> Subject: Registration Numbers >> >> Can anyone tell me if I have this right? According to AC 20-27D >> "Certification and Operation of Amateur-Built Aircraft" the following >> possible registration numbers are legitimate: >> >> N1 >> N11 >> N111 >> N11111 >> N1A >> N11A >> N111A >> N1111A >> N1AB >> N11AB >> N111AB >> >> have I got it right? >> >> And as I understand it, if the number(s) I want are available I can reserve >> it for a year for $10, and $10 every year thereafter until registered. >> >> Do you automatically get to reserve that number, or must you submit another >> search request? >> >> Thanks >> Noel >> > > >-- >-------------------------------------------------------- >*NOTICE for internet mail*: Any ideas or thoughts expressed here are my > own and are independent of my employer. > >Herman Dierks, Dept. E54S, AWSD Austin, Texas >AIX Network Performance Measurement/Analysis >phone: TL 678-2831 outside: (512) 838-2831 >ZIP: 9632 fax: 512-838-1801 >mail: dierks(at)austin.ibm.com VM: DIERKS at AUSVM6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: James Caufield <caufield(at)sequent.com>
Subject: Wing skins
Date: Aug 07, 1995
> > On Fri, 4 Aug 1995, Jim McDonald wrote: > > > I read about single-piece top skins the in Justice instructions and might > > just do that given my situation. He said Van's won't ship them > > single-piece top skins. Where can I get them? (i.e., will anyone ship > > them?) > > While I understand that Van's will not ship one-piece skins, I > investigated obtaining them locally. The local distributor in > the Phoeniz, AZ area is Capitol Metals. I would have to order a > 4 x 12 sheet and have it sheared to size. A 4 x 12 sheet of .032 > was going to be about $150. Capitol could shear it to size for me, > at an additional $20 charge. > > Actually, shipping a sheet of aluminum is no big deal, you > just roll it up. > So I was hanging out at Twin Oaks airport Saturday, and who shows up but Van in the new RV-8. I was looking it over and noticed that it had a 2-piece top wing skin. I asked him why he of all people couldn't have used a single piece of .032 for it. After all, he doesn't have to worry about shipping, right? 8-) Van's answer was: "The single skin is heavier; you don't get performance by being lazy." Never a man to mince words. I also noticed that the '8 had a single instrument that provided airspeed, altitude, rate-of-climb and encoding for the transponder. Nice and neat. From: RUSS_NICHOLS_at_SAC__DATA__PROCESSING(at)fire.ca.gov
Date: Aug 07, 1995
>From RUSS_NICHOLS_at_SAC__DATA__PROCESSING Mon Aug 7 13:23:55 0700 1995 remote from fire.ca.gov
Date: Aug 07, 1995
From: RUSS_NICHOLS_at_SAC__DATA__PROCESSING(at)fire.ca.gov (RUSS NICHOLS) Subject: primer interaction Hello all... I'm actually starting to get some work done on my airplane rather than just the shop/garage! Now, I have a couple more priming questions. A) To date, I've been doing the following for priming... 1) Alumiprep 2) Alodine 3) Zinc Oxide I want to switch to either Dupont Variprime or Courtaulds epoxy primer. Does anyone know if they will "react" with the zinc oxide? I remember someone saying bad things happened when Variprime was sprayed near Marhyde. B) I still need to prime my elevator horns (weldments). What should I use to clean them before I prime? Is alumiprep OK or should I get something else? thanks, Russ Nichols russ_nichols(at)fire.ca.gov RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 07, 1995
From: "Doug Miner" <dougm(at)qm.WV.TEK.COM>
Subject: Re: Registration Numbers (f
RE>>Registration Numbers (fwd) 8/7/95 1:30 PM oh man that reminds me of another ramp-rat story... I was the flight line manager for a rather large FBO at HIO... We were expecting that very G-2 of the FAA... I was standing on the ramp with my red carpet to roll out after I parked em... it was late summer... ie: had just rained... and I marshelled the airplane to stop....when the copilot opened the big door that folds down from wayyyy up there... it ended up being right above a 2"deep 6'long 3'wide puddle of Oregon sunshine! I couldn't ask the pilot to restart those huge rolls royces... so I stood back about ten feet and rolled my carpet right up to the last step of the stairs... (through the puddle) I was embarrassed as hell... but all the pilots of 'my' FBO were laughing and patting me on the back and laughing and laughing... I can laugh now, but man was I as red as that carpet. D~ -------------------------------------- Date: 8/7/95 1:18 PM From: Gil Alexander > I don't think some of your numbers are valid. > Here is part of what I posted a few weeks back from the same doc you > are referencing: > Note that there are rules about N numbers. > It can not start with the letters O or I. > It may not exceed 5 symbols following the N > The symbols may be all numbers (N10000) , one to four numbers and a suffex > letter, (N1000U) one to three numbers and two suffix letters (N100AB) > The first zero (0) must be preceeded by a number 1-9. > > Therefore, I think you are violating the rule 'one to four numbers AND > a suffex. It would have to be N1A for example and not N1. Actually N1 is used by the head of the FAA, and was parked near the FBO area at Oshkosh. I have also seen it at Minden NV when the FAA head was taken for a glider ride (around the course during the Hitachi Invitational Contest in the late 80's - some ride, even he barfed!) by Bill Ivans, head of the CIVV(?) (glider section of the FAI). It is a 4 engined Gulfstream jet I believe. Sorry about the CIVV and FAI acronyms, but they are french, and I don't have the english equivalents. I think all of the number below are valid, but I doubt if any are available. Gil Alexander, RV6A, #20701, waiting for N64GA reservation ... > > Yes, $10 then 10.00 per yr until you assign it to a registered AC. > or if it expires you start over again. > Herman > >> Subject: Registration Numbers >> >> Can anyone tell me if I have this right? According to AC 20-27D >> "Certification and Operation of Amateur-Built Aircraft" the following >> possible registration numbers are legitimate: >> >> N1 >> N11 >> N111 >> N11111 >> N1A >> N11A >> N111A >> N1111A >> N1AB >> N11AB >> N111AB >> >> have I got it right? >> >> And as I understand it, if the number(s) I want are available I can reserve >> it for a year for $10, and $10 every year thereafter until registered. >> >> Do you automatically get to reserve that number, or must you submit another >> search request? >> >> Thanks >> Noel >> > > >-- >-------------------------------------------------------- >*NOTICE for internet mail*: Any ideas or thoughts expressed here are my > own and are independent of my employer. > >Herman Dierks, Dept. E54S, AWSD Austin, Texas >AIX Network Performance Measurement/Analysis >phone: TL 678-2831 outside: (512) 838-2831 >ZIP: 9632 fax: 512-838-1801 >mail: dierks(at)austin.ibm.com VM: DIERKS at AUSVM6 ------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------ Date: Mon, 07 Aug 1995 10:54:34 -0800 From: rassp.hac.com!gil(at)matronics.COM (Gil Alexander) Subject: Re: Registration Numbers (fwd) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 07, 1995
From: gil(at)rassp.hac.com (Gil Alexander)
Subject: Re: Russ' questions
**** Russ said **** > > Hello all... > > I'm actually starting to get some work done on my airplane rather than > just the shop/garage! Now, I have a couple more priming questions. > > A) To date, I've been doing the following for priming... > > 1) Alumiprep > 2) Alodine > 3) Zinc Oxide > > I want to switch to either Dupont Variprime or Courtaulds epoxy > primer. Does anyone know if they will "react" with the zinc oxide? I > remember someone saying bad things happened when Variprime was sprayed > near Marhyde. Epoxy paints are good over most sound substrates. The Dexter Aerospace (was Akzo) from Aircraft Spruce might be easier to obtain, and is equivalent to Courtaulds. Scuff paint surfaces with red ScotchBrite and then a solvent wipe. Use a solvent that won't attack the existing paint :^) The automotive paint store should be able to give you a good pre-paint solvent wipe solution. > > B) I still need to prime my elevator horns (weldments). What should > I use to clean them before I prime? Is alumiprep OK or should I get > something else? I like cadmium plating, and they will clean the parts before plating. Tony Bingelis in his books mentions something called "Ospho" for cleaning 4130 steel parts. QUESTION TO ALL: I'm not familiar with this, could anyone provide more info??? ... thanks ... Gil Alexander > > thanks, > > Russ Nichols > russ_nichols(at)fire.ca.gov > RV-6 Russ, Your message to Jack Abell got through. I've met with him already, and he only lives 3 miles away ... Gil A. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 07, 1995
From: Robert Busick <rbusick(at)nmsu.edu>
Subject: Re: RV-Listers
Jim Can you tell me more about the micro engine monitor. I have the manufactures poop sheet, but is it easy to build, how reliable do you think it will be, do you really need all of the info provided, in IFR will you trust the info and or reliability? Is it cheaper than buying the instruments seperately? Any landmines to watch out for? What about the Paul Harvey rest of the story? Thanks Bob Busick RV-6 On Wed, 2 Aug 1995 aol.com!JamesCone(at)matronics.com wrote: > James Cone > St. Charles, MO > jamescone(at)aol.com > RV-6A 22929 N929JC > > TAIL, WINGS, & FUSELAGE COMPLED. WORKING ON FINISHING KIT. > FULL IFR PANEL, O-320E2D 160HP, MICRO MONITOR ENGINE INSTRUMENT SYSTEM, > ELLISON THROTTLE BODY, SKY-TECH STARTER, PELICAN 65 AMP ALTERNATOR, SENSENICH > FIXED PITCH PROP, SLIDER CANOPY, ELECTRIC FLAPS, ELECTRIC TRIM, MANUAL > AILERON TRIM, SELF DESIGNED MANUAL RUDDER TRIM. HOPE TO BE FLYING NEXT YEAR. > > AIRLINE CAPTAIN FOR TWA. RETIRED LT. COL. USAF PILOT. AVIATION NEWSPAPER > COLUMNIST. EDITOR OF VAN'S AIR FORCE, TRI-STATE WING NEWSLETTER. COMPLETED > AND FLEW A SEA HAWKER COMPOSITE AMPHIBIAN THAT HAS SINCE BEEN SOLD. EAA > FLIGHT ADVISOR FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE AIRCRAFT. VICE PRESIDENT OF EAA CHAPTER > 32, ST. LOUIS, MO. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CAT3TOOLS(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 07, 1995
Subject: RV6 FOR SALE
RV6 - Two time award winner. 0320 E2D 150 HP 600 Hr. 1st. Major O.H. with logs 140 Hr. A.F. Garman GPS Panel Mnt. Mode C Dual Controls Intercom Interior by DJ N711KJ Ho 515-432-5709 Wk 515-432-3660 $70,000 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 07, 1995
From: rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com (Ross Mickey )
Subject: Are Videos Worth It??? Right side brakes??
I purchased George and Becky Orndorff's Empennage and Wing construction videos. The Emp. video was quite helpful as I was totally "green". I found the wing video to be entertaining but not as useful. Now that I am starting the Fuselage, I am wondering if I should spring the $50 for this video. Any comments???? Now that I'm writing, what about right side brakes?? I don't see the point. ( I bet you -4 and -3 builders don't either!!!!!) Ross Mickey Still F605 (why is this seat belt bracket so ***##!@@ close to the edge of the F-605B????) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RUSS_NICHOLS_at_SAC__DATA__PROCESSING(at)fire.ca.gov
Date: Aug 07, 1995
>From RUSS_NICHOLS_at_SAC__DATA__PROCESSING Mon Aug 7 16:00:50 0700 1995 remote from fire.ca.gov
Date: Aug 07, 1995
From: RUSS_NICHOLS_at_SAC__DATA__PROCESSING(at)fire.ca.gov (RUSS NICHOLS) Subject: More primer questions I just called Courtaulds to ask about pricing on their primers and was immediately stumped. She asked me "which one"... In the RV-Archive, I was able to find a reference to MIL-P 23377, type 1, class 1. That looks to be the one that I want. Of course, they don't have any in stock right now. They do have class 2 in stock. She gave me a kit price of $125 for the class 2 (yellow, by the way). Since I don't have the MIL Spec, I don't know what class 2 means. Is it heavier? Do I take even more years off my life by spraying that one? Is it harder to handle? Should hold out for the type 1, class 1? Locally, I can get Dupont Variprime at the prices below (in $/gal): 225 (alumiprep): 23 226 (alodine) 23 615 (primer) 80 616 (catalyst) 39 Do these prices sound about right? thanks, Russ Nichols russ_nichols(at)fire.ca.gov ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 07, 1995
From: Robert Busick <rbusick(at)nmsu.edu>
Subject: Re: rv trim
Based upon my RV flight training with Mike Seager, we only used two flap settings during landing, initial flap setting was 50%, followed by 100% on final. During take offs we used 10%. I have about 4 hours in an RV-6 and I haven't a clue to where 10% or 50% positions are using electric trim. But my conclusion is that it really doesn't matter. If you must know exactly then try and engineer some system to tell you. But with my limited experience in flying an RV, and compared to a cessna, I am wondering why we need flaps at all? Bob Busick RV-6 On Sun, 6 Aug 1995, Joe Larson wrote: > > > Richard asked if it were possible to make a electronicly controlled > > > trim system. > > > > i definitely think going digital is overkill... > > > > The best way to make such a system (IMHO) is analog. > > I'm a bit behind in reading my email, so if someone has already suggested > this, I apoligize. > > I learned to fly in Cessna 152s. The 152s at my FBO, at least, all have > a slider switch with detents at 10 and 20 degrees. Full flaps is 30. You > move the slider to the appropriate spot, and the flaps go to that spot. > > My RV *will* have a similar system. As one of the posters explained, when > I'm going from 10 degrees to 20 degrees, I have a things that I want to > deal with that are a lot more important than making sure I stop the flaps > at the desired place. Set the switch and ignore the darned thing. > > My approach... I was going to steal one off a crashed Cessna. Why reinvent > the wheel? Everything we want, all TSO'd and everything, is available for > use. You just need to give a call to your favorite aircraft junkyard and > ask if they have any 152s or 172s you can steal parts off of. > > Of course, if someone comes out with a kit of some sort for this, I would > consider that, too. Or I might ask a friend of mine who likes to play with > this stuff more than I do if he can design one for me. I bet he would get > a kick out of it, and I know he'll trade his design time for some flight > time in the completed airplane. > > -Joe > > -- > Joe Larson jpl(at)showpg.mn.org 612-595-9690(w) > Showpage Software, Inc. > 435 Ford Rd, Suite 315 > St. Louis Park, Mn 55426 Future RV-6A pilot. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rad(at)gulf.net
Date: Aug 07, 1995
Subject: List Update/Hurricane Erin Damage
I hope to be wrapping up the "who are we" list this week. There are about 60 people on it currently. If you would like to be included, please send me (rad(at)gulf.net) your info by the end of the week. Again I would ask that you not send your individual info to the rv-list. I will post the compiled version to everyone. As I mentioned before, I live in Navarre. FL. Unfortunately, we were ground zero for Hurricane Erin last Thursday. Our house had about $2500 damage to the (my wifes) pool enclosure and decking. The RV project is unharmed despite the rotten looking tree in our neighbors yard that leans toward my garage. The golf course in our neighborhood estimates that they have 800 to 1000 trees down from the storm. There were 172 on just one hole! There is a small (scary) grass strip on the bay that had about a dozen planes tied down in the open. None of them appear to be damaged. North of here about 20 miles is Peter Prince Field (2R4). They had about a dozen planes tied up in the open, about 10 in an open hanger, and a number of closed hangers. The only real damage was to the planes in the open hanger. The entire structure was blown away and the supporting beams hit any plane that was near them. Unfortunately, my friends Grumman AA1-A is probably totalled as a result. :-( From what he told me, there are about 6 that are damaged to some degree. I haven't heard of much damage at Pensacola Regional. Why were all the planes here, you ask? No one expected the storm to hit here. At midnight Wednesday, the storm was heading for New Orleans. An hour later, it turned North. We woke up to a surprise. Russell Duffy RV-6 sn-22407 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Graves <mgraves(at)ptdcs2.intel.com>
Subject: Ospho
Date: Aug 07, 1995
> Tony Bingelis in his books mentions something called "Ospho" for > cleaning 4130 steel parts. > I used this stuff one about ten years ago. It is a Phosphoric acid solution that painters apply to rusted metal prior to painting. Strangely enough, it is also an ingredient in a certain brand of root beer 8^). Mike Graves RV-6A in box on closet shelf ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 07, 1995
From: Don Wentz <Don_Wentz(at)ccm2.hf.intel.com>
Subject: Re: How Do You Do It, Part II (chatter)
>That's great, but now brings up another of the wife's objections: why >build a 2-place aircraft when you have a wife and kids? Jim, I get asked that question a lot. Why are you building an RV? Because it is sporty and goes upside down, or so you can 'travel'? I built mine for me, so I can fly in a way not possible in your store bought stuff. So I could stand beside it and say "yep, I can't beleive I built the whole thing". I have no desire at all to have an airplane that can carry 4 people, it just wouldn't be as fun (think of your A-10 - is it more fun when you're just blasting around with no ordinance, or when you're loaded down with bombs/missiles/cannon rounds?). Flying is just for the fun and excitement of it, there is nothing practical about it at all (for me, anyway). Yes, I really enjoy the rare trip where Janet can go with me. And my kids (5 & 8) are beginning to enjoy flying in it. But by far, the most common mission is me and sometimes a local builder, just flying around having fun. My wife and kids don't like most fly-ins anyway. They get tired of "talking about airplanes" pretty quickly. And when I am at one, I don't want to be worrying about where the kids are, are they out of props, are they tugging at my leg "let's go dad, I'm bored"? No, I want to be there looking at what I want, talking to who I want as long as I want. Sound selfish? I don't think so. I find other things to do with my family that THEY want to do (next year we get a reasonably inexpensive boat that will be a much better family toy than an airplane), and they are happy to let me do my airplane thing. If I can include them now and then, so much the better. But I don't compromise my airplane or an event to do so. Like a couple of listers responded, and I have heard it from others, most of the time, it's just the pilot, or maybe one passenger. The main thing to do is agree up front on WHEN you can do the airplane thing. We had Sunday as family day, saturday as building day, and evenings after the kids went to bed, unless something else was planned. I was able to get 3000hrs into my project, plus design, get into production, and market my landing lights, in just under 4 years, using that schedule. As long as you can get her to agree, and show her that you will make specific efforts to still be a part of the family (at least occasionally), she may be agreeable. >To Don Wentz: if I can get an A-10 up to Portland someday, I'll show you >mine if you show me yours! Great, think the National Guard will let me park on their ramp at PDX? I am always up to meeting someone visiting the area and give a ride, if schedules work out. I think 4 of the folks at the last Van's bldrs class got rides in N790DW.... Don 'The Duck' Wentz, N790DW, 180HP RV-6, #20369 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 07, 1995
From: Gary Standley <Gary_Standley(at)ccm.ssd.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Wing skins
Text item: Did Van also tell you he probably didn't have much to do with the building of the RV8 anyway. I know Art Chard isn't lazy. ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Wing skins Date: 8/7/95 11:20 AM > > On Fri, 4 Aug 1995, Jim McDonald wrote: > > > I read about single-piece top skins the in Justice instructions and might > > just do that given my situation. He said Van's won't ship them > > single-piece top skins. Where can I get them? (i.e., will anyone ship > > them?) > > While I understand that Van's will not ship one-piece skins, I > investigated obtaining them locally. The local distributor in > the Phoeniz, AZ area is Capitol Metals. I would have to order a > 4 x 12 sheet and have it sheared to size. A 4 x 12 sheet of .032 > was going to be about $150. Capitol could shear it to size for me, > at an additional $20 charge. > > Actually, shipping a sheet of aluminum is no big deal, you > just roll it up. > So I was hanging out at Twin Oaks airport Saturday, and who shows up but Van in the new RV-8. I was looking it over and noticed that it had a 2-piece top wing skin. I asked him why he of all people couldn't have used a single piece of .032 for it. After all, he doesn't have to worry about shipping, right? 8-) Van's answer was: "The single skin is heavier; you don't get performance by being lazy." Never a man to mince words. I also noticed that the '8 had a single instrument that provided airspeed, altitude, rate-of-climb and encoding for the transponder. Nice and neat. Date: Aug 07, 1995
From: Don Wentz <Don_Wentz(at)ccm2.hf.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Wing skins
I have the single top skin and really like it. BUT, if it would have cost more time and money than a 10 minute drive to Van's to get it, it wouldn't have been worth it. ESPECIALLY since now the 2-piece come pre-drilled. Don 'The Duck' Wentz, N790DW, 180HP RV-6, #20369 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1995
From: jmpcrftr(at)teleport.com (Michael McGee)
Subject: Ospho
> >> Tony Bingelis in his books mentions something called "Ospho" for >> cleaning 4130 steel parts. >> > > > I used this stuff one about ten years ago. It is a Phosphoric acid >solution that painters apply to rusted metal prior to painting. Strangely >enough, it is also an ingredient in a certain brand of root beer 8^). > > > Mike Graves > We used Ospho when I was working one summer overhauling commercial fishing boats. After scraping the rusted metal on the boat you hit it with a coat of Ospho and it would turn the remaining rust black (phosphoric acid reacting with the iron oxide). This changes the rust to a stable compound (chemists?) that the marine paint would stay stuck to. After it dried (the Ospho) we painted and were done. Mike McGee Mike McGee & Jackie Stiles jmpcrftr(at)teleport.com RV-6 ..sn 23530.. (in the "plans" still) .. shop almost ready ... SHOP: ++++++---- (It's full of junk from movin' in ..mnph..) TAIL: ---------- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1995
From: Don Wentz <Don_Wentz(at)ccm2.hf.intel.com>
Subject: Dropping off the list for awhile...
Due to my job getting out of hand again, I am going to ask Matt to remove me from the list for awhile. I spend too much time reading this stuff, and enjoy it too much to have the discipline not to. I sent this to the whole list since I often get questions about landing lights and stuff. Feel free to contact me directly if you are going to be in the area or have something for me personally, just remember not to send Duckworks questions to the whole list. And if you feel compelled to respond to this, please respond ONLY to the SENDER, not to the whole list :-). In the words of the Terminator - "I'll be back!". Don 'The Duck' Wentz, N790DW, 180HP RV-6, #20369 don_wentz(at)ccm.hf.intel.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1995
From: "MIKE PILLA" <mpilla(at)ccsmtplink.espinc.com>
Subject: Re: List Update/Hurricane Erin Damage
Russell, glad your project survived. I don't want to sound ghoulish, but, for those builders looking for a good used engine, there are probably some good finds available as a result of Erin. I got my O-320-E2D after Andrew hit Florida a while ago. I had been advised by an experienced builder to pounce after a natural disaster since the damage is almost totally to an airframe and the engine is usually unaffected... Be sensitive, though, guys. It is an emotional time. I purchased mine from an owner, but you can often get them through the insurance companies. Sometimes, if the panel is what you want, you can get the whole bird. I live in NJ so that was not really an option, for me. TAP, btw, will have ads in a couple of weeks, or so, too. Mike Pilla pilla(at)espinc.com ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: List Update/Hurricane Erin Damage Date: 8/7/95 10:53 PM --- snip --- The only real damage was to the planes in the open hanger. The entire structure was blown away and the supporting beams hit any plane that was near them. --- snip --- Why were all the planes here, you ask? No one expected the storm to hit here. At midnight Wednesday, the storm was heading for New Orleans. An hour later, it turned North. We woke up to a surprise. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: jeayers(at)CCGATE.HAC.COM
Date: Aug 08, 1995
Subject: Re: Right side brakes??
>Ross Mickey wrote; >Now that I'm writing, what about right side brakes?? I don't see the >point. ( I bet you -4 and -3 builders don't either!!!!!) As an RV-3 flyer, I see the need for right side brakes and left side brakes, one of each, that is. BTW, I mounted the brake reservoir directly to the brake cylinder. That's buried right against the firewall, and very difficult to get access to verify the fluid level. I installed the small brass fittings on the top of the reservoir, and ran 1/16" dia. plastic oil pressure tube teed together to an overboard vent. I back-fill the brakes at the wheel. When the overboard vent dumps brake fluid on a strategically placed rag on the hangar floor, the reservoir for that brake is full. (I realize that the RV-4 and RV-6 brake reservoirs are set up different.) Jim Ayers LOM RV-3 (323.7hrs Lyc, and 13.3hrs LOM) Engine running cold, and doesn't like it. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1995
From: Frank K Justice <Frank_K_Justice(at)ccm.ssd.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Alumiprep and steel cleaning
Text item: >From RUSS_NICHOLS_at_SAC__DATA__PROCESSING Mon Aug 7 13:23:55 0700 1995 remote from fire.ca.gov Date: Mon, 7 Aug 1995 13:23:55 -0700 From: RUSS_NICHOLS_at_SAC__DATA__PROCESSING(at)fire.ca.gov (RUSS NICHOLS) Subject: primer interaction Hello all... The best cleaner for the 4130 steel parts is steel cleaner. Metalprep is one brand name, I'm sure there are others just like there are other aluminum cleaner/etchers besides "Alumiprep". Alumiprep has phosphoric acid in it but it does a lousy job of cleaning the steel parts. Metalprep gets off all the oils and oxides, leaving an obviously clean dull silver surface. Naval Jelly works also. Orthophosphoric acid is the common ingredient in steel cleaners. Metalprep may say on the containiner that it works on aluminum but it doesn't do a good job. Use Alumiprep for much better results. Text item: External Message Header The following mail header is for administrative use and may be ignored unless there are problems. ***IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS SAVE THESE HEADERS***. Date: Mon, 7 Aug 95 10:30 PDT .1) From: fire.ca.gov!RUSS_NICHOLS_at_SAC__DATA__PROCESSING(at)matronics.com 4.1) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1995
From: gil(at)rassp.hac.com (Gil Alexander)
Subject: Re: Russ' questions on primers
*** Russ wrote **** > > > I just called Courtaulds to ask about pricing on their primers and was > immediately stumped. She asked me "which one"... > > In the RV-Archive, I was able to find a reference to MIL-P 23377, type > 1, class 1. That looks to be the one that I want. Of course, they > don't have any in stock right now. They do have class 2 in stock. > She gave me a kit price of $125 for the class 2 (yellow, by the way). > Since I don't have the MIL Spec, I don't know what class 2 means. Is Class 2 in this case is described as "High-Solids" with a max. VOC of 340 gr/l (a measure of solvent volatility) Class 1 is described as "Standard Solvents" - no max VOC measure. The Class 2 products may be a little harder to spray in a thin layer, or just may need a higher proportion of thinner to get to the correct spraying consistency. I would go for the AKZO (now Dexter Aerospace) FR (Fluid Resistant) primer from Aircraft Spruce. Was about $85 for a 2 gallon kit. 1:1 mix, and no thinner required, and real easy to spray. It's easier to use and easier to get. > it heavier? Do I take even more years off my life by spraying that > one? Is it harder to handle? Should hold out for the type 1, class > 1? > > > > Locally, I can get Dupont Variprime at the prices below (in $/gal): > 225 (alumiprep): 23 > 226 (alodine) 23 These two sound about the same in LA. Interestingly enough, 1 qt of alodine costs about $16, but they will order the gallon size. 4x the product for 1.5x the price!! > 615 (primer) 80 > 616 (catalyst) 39 > > Do these prices sound about right? > > thanks, > > Russ Nichols > russ_nichols(at)fire.ca.gov ... keep on priming ... Gil Alexander ... woking on roll-over structure ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Graves <mgraves(at)ptdcs2.intel.com>
Subject: wing skins
Date: Aug 08, 1995
Hi folks! I have a question for you veteran wing builders. I understand that it can be difficult (or impossible) to close a wing using AN rivets everywhere, requiring pop rivets in a couple of tight spots. a) Is there a way to use only AN rivets? b) Does the one-piece skin help or hinder this? Mike Graves RV-6A in box on closet shelf ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1995
From: "A. Reichert" <reichera(at)clark.net>
Subject: Re: Ospho
You can purchase this stuff in a good auto parts and repair store, but I don't recall brand names. I've used it successfully on auto body work. - Alan > We used Ospho when I was working one summer overhauling commercial fishing > boats. After scraping the rusted metal on the boat you hit it with a coat > of Ospho and it would turn the remaining rust black (phosphoric acid > reacting with the iron oxide). This changes the rust to a stable compound > (chemists?) that the marine paint would stay stuck to. After it dried (the > Ospho) we painted and were done. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: gasobek(at)CCGATE.HAC.COM
Date: Aug 08, 1995
Subject: RE: Right Side Brakes??? / Primer!
I installed right side brakes just for added safety. 1. If I do not feel like my tail-dragger experience is up to stuff, I can have a safety pilot. (I have 17 hours tailwheel experience.) 2. If the starter dies away from home, the copilot can hold the brakes while I hand prop the plane. 3. I can fly from the right seat so that I have right hand on the stick and left on the throttle Just like it is supposed to be! <:^) 4. The most important reason for right side brakes in an RV-6 is so that I can check my friend Brian out in the left seat. He can then get experience in the seat he will be flying from. IMHO, if there is not a valid reason for dual brakes, do not put them in! It all boils down to what mission YOUR airplane is going to be used for. Van set design goals and compromised (in very few areas) to come up with the RV series of aircraft. Every change from the plans that is made changes the original design goals. Van's basic design must be what you want or you would not have picked the RV in the first place. Attn.: Russ RE: Primer I have applied Veriprime over zinc oxide with good results. Only on one occasion did I have a problem. I did not let the zinc oxide dry long enough. (less than 30 minutes) The Veriprime dried to a crinkle finish. As for prep of Veriprime, I recommend skipping the acid wash and alodine on the interior surfaces. Veriprime is a metal etching primer with acid in it. Just wipe with acetone and prime. I have one friend who has been flying his RV-4 for 4 years and 450 hours TT who did this on his exterior with no paint problems to date. (I would recommend doing the full treatment on the exterior.) On my next aircraft, I will NOT prime the interior Alclad surfaces. I have seen too many production aircraft with NO interior primer that are in excellent shape 30 and 40 years after they were built. If an aircraft is hangared and annual inspections are done as required, corrosion will be kept in check. ACF-50 type treatments are available if needed. They are less expensive than primer and lighter. At least a 1% weight increase occurs by adding primer. This is 10 pounds of extra weight that is not needed! Priming alclad parts IMHO is an added expense and waste of time. I would save the cost, time and weight for more important things. Gary RV-6 20480 N-157GS ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1995
From: gil(at)rassp.hac.com (Gil Alexander)
Subject: Ospho - where to buy?
Guys, thanks for the comments... ... is it a standard Hardware Store item?? I've never seen it in our local h/w store, and I know their stock better than some of the clerks :^) Should I try marine stores??? Has anyone bought Ospho recently?? if so, where??? ... thanks for the help .... Gil Alexander >> >>> Tony Bingelis in his books mentions something called "Ospho" for >>> cleaning 4130 steel parts. >>> >> >> >> I used this stuff one about ten years ago. It is a Phosphoric acid >>solution that painters apply to rusted metal prior to painting. Strangely >>enough, it is also an ingredient in a certain brand of root beer 8^). >> >> >> Mike Graves >> > > >We used Ospho when I was working one summer overhauling commercial fishing >boats. After scraping the rusted metal on the boat you hit it with a coat >of Ospho and it would turn the remaining rust black (phosphoric acid >reacting with the iron oxide). This changes the rust to a stable compound >(chemists?) that the marine paint would stay stuck to. After it dried (the >Ospho) we painted and were done. > > >Mike McGee > >Mike McGee & Jackie Stiles jmpcrftr(at)teleport.com >RV-6 ..sn 23530.. (in the "plans" still) .. shop almost ready ... >SHOP: ++++++---- (It's full of junk from movin' in ..mnph..) >TAIL: ---------- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1995
From: Earl W Brabandt <Earl_W_Brabandt(at)ccm.jf.intel.com>
Subject: 2x vs. 3x rivet guns
Text item: 2x/3x seems to be a matter of personal preference. I prefer the 2x as it's smaller size makes it easier to control with one hand. I haven't found it to be lacking in hitting power up to the larger 1/8" rivets on the RV. I have a 3x gun too but I never use it. I have a "pistol" 2x and a "straight" 3x. I mostly use the 2x but wouldn't be without the 3x because I believe it's more controllable on 1/8" rivets. (It hits harder and slower and seems better matched to the mass/size of the rivet). Additionally having both a pistol and a straight sometimes helps in tight or unusual places. I bought both CP guns surplus for about $100 each as I recall. Calin (formerly Earl -- name change hearing on Thur.) Text item: External Message Header The following mail header is for administrative use and may be ignored unless there are problems. ***IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS SAVE THESE HEADERS***. Subject: Re: New Guy on the Block From: edt.com!randall(at)matronics.com (Randall Henderson) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 1995 17:13:17 -0700 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: gasobek(at)CCGATE.HAC.COM
Date: Aug 08, 1995
Subject: RE: Wing skins.
>>...veteran wing builders..... >> a) Is there a way to use only AN rivets? >> b) Does the one-piece skin help or hinder this? answers: a) Yes. Do not rivet inboard "wing walk ribs" to spars until ready to rivet skin to that rib. Do it the same way that AN rivets were used on the nose rib in the horizontal stab. b) Same process. Why use one piece skin? 1) The aircraft is strong enough with out it. 2) it cost more. 3) it weighs more. Does someone think that 1 piece skins look several hundred dollars better? Gary A. Sobek 20480 N-157GS ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1995
From: Frank K Justice <Frank_K_Justice(at)ccm.ssd.intel.com>
Subject: Re: wing skins
>I understand that it can be difficult (or impossible) to close a wing using AN >rivets everywhere, requiring pop rivets in a couple of tight spots. > > a) Is there a way to use only AN rivets? Yes, there is an easy way described in my instructions, and a hard way but still possible. > b) Does the one-piece skin help or hinder this? Doesn't make any difference. Most people nowadays rivet on the topskin first. FKJ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1995
From: dahearn(at)attmail.com (Dan Ahearn)
Subject: Change of address
Matt, Please change my address from Djahearn(at)aol.com to dahearn(at)attmail.com Thanks in advance Dan ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1995
From: Earl W Brabandt <Earl_W_Brabandt(at)ccm.jf.intel.com>
Subject: Re[2]: Wing skins.
Text item: >>...veteran wing builders..... >> a) Is there a way to use only AN rivets? >> b) Does the one-piece skin help or hinder this? > answers: > a) Yes. Do not rivet inboard "wing walk ribs" to spars until ready > to rivet skin to that rib. Do it the same way that AN rivets were > used on the nose rib in the horizontal stab. > b) Same process. > Why use one piece skin? I closed my wings (bottom skin) without using any pop rivets. I did all riveting solo and had already riveted the wing walk ribs to the spars (unfortunately). If you close by riveting the top skin last, a one-piece top skin would be a bit of a hindrance due to the need to reach under a longer length skin for some rivets. If the top skin is riveted first, it doesn't matter. The one-piece top skins are only slightly heavier according to previous RV list discussions (what? about 2 lbs total / airplane as I recall?) I belive the one-piece skins make it easier to check the spar for straightness in the jig because the one piece shear line is very straight. However, there's no way that I'd do it again now that the pre-punched skins are available and I'm not sure I'd do it again even if they were not available. Calin N66VR in progress Text item: External Message Header The following mail header is for administrative use and may be ignored unless there are problems. ***IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS SAVE THESE HEADERS***. Subject: RE: Wing skins. Date: Tue, 08 Aug 95 13:09:50 PST From: CCGATE.HAC.COM!gasobek(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1995
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Wing skins.
I used the one piece top skins. Nice to have, but I wouldn't go to the trouble if I wasn't local and can go pick them up myself. The biggest advantage I feel is that the thicker skin outboard will be smoother (less "rippling" over the skeleton) and will be less likely to show hangar rash. I don't think the seam is a big deal cosmetically, nor is it much more work to build. But that single piece across there does look pretty darned nice. But Cal is right -- no way I'd do it now that the two-piece prepunched are available. And before someone asks -- NO, I'm sure they WON'T ever provide a single piece topskin pre-punched. Van never did like the single piece top skin, he only grudgingly provides it, since people ask for it. The reason they don't ship them is not that they can't, it's that they WON'T. Randall Henderson RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1995
From: jmpcrftr(at)teleport.com (Michael McGee)
Subject: Re: Ospho
Don Karl asked regarding the Ospho treatments: >Mike, > >Did it actually work? Were you able to see the results over a longer >period than one summer? > ---snip--- No I didn't get a chance to see if it really lasted through a season or not. I was/am like you in that I was taught that you have to get ALL of the rust off of the steel before you can expect the paint to stick. OTOH you can't REALLY get all of the rust off before you paint unless you are working in an atmosphere with no oxygen. It's just that the paint can bridge the microscopic rust spots that develope, seal it from further oxidation (also what the Ospho does), and stay bonded to the metal around them. So what it boils down to is that when you get something ready to paint -- paint it. Else you will need to get it ready to paint again. (BTW - in the above "paint" means prime/paint :)) (..hope that didn't get too long winded..) Mike McGee & Jackie Stiles jmpcrftr(at)teleport.com RV-6 ..sn 23530.. (in the "plans" still) .. shop almost ready ... SHOP: ++++++---- (It's full of junk from movin' in ..mnph..) TAIL: ---------- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1995
From: dahearn(at)attmail.com (Dan Ahearn)
Subject: Shipping costs
First, sorry to those who had the pleasure of reading my post for the address change, I'll figure this out someday.... Some issues I'm considering as I prepare to order my -6 kit. I'm curious about freight cost from Vans to Central NJ. I'm betting I can save some money and time by ordering the wing and tail kits at the same time. Based on what I've seen on the list most folks seem to take several months to get to the wings and with the delay time on kits, this might work out well. What about corrosion, if I have parts sitting around for 6 months or more should they be primed before storage? In fact, I've watched the kit price rise slowly over the years (about $1,000 if I'm not mistaken). Would there be any major disadvantage to ordering the whole shabang assuming I have the space and a loading dock for that big beautiful box? Dan RV-6 23101 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1995
From: dahearn(at)attmail.com (Dan Ahearn)
Subject: (Chatter) List commands
I'm the type who doesn't ask directions but in the interest in doing this right... Could someone post the appropriate address to reach the list admin as well as some of the basic commands to retrieve archives? I promise I'll save it this time! Come now, somebody else was wondering Dan RV-6 23101 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Djahearn(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 08, 1995
Subject: list question (chatter)
I'm the type who doesn't ask directions but in the interest in doing this right... Could someone post the appropriate address to reach the list admin as well as some of the basic commands to retrieve archives? I promise I'll save it this time! Come now, somebody else was wondering Dan ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dierks(at)austin.ibm.com
Subject: Shipping costs (fwd)
Date: Aug 08, 1995
I don't think you will save anything on shipping all the kits at the same time. You see, the kits are boxed up in special size boxes designed to exactly cram all the pieces into the minimum space. You will get 4 different sized boxes no matter if you order them seperate or all together. Also, even if you order them at the same time. They will be manufactured on differing schedules and will ship at different times. (at least mine did). Why not just call Van's and ask them. They are the experts. Also, there is some advantage to waiting till you need the kit. You will be ensured of the latest mods. For example, the finish kits went through a number of changes in cowl's, etc. If you bought it early, you are stuck with it as Van's will normally not take back obsolete items. You also have to store all the suff some where. The one advantage of getting it all at once is if for some reason they went out of business, you have it all and are not 'hung out to dry'. This is not likely with Van's but many a builder has been burned by other companies like this. With law suits what they are, one suit could shutdown someone. The kit prices are driven a lot by the cost of Aluminum, which has been going up. Herman. > From: attmail.com!dahearn(at)matronics.com (Dan Ahearn) > Subject: Shipping costs > > First, sorry to those who had the pleasure of reading my post for the > address change, I'll figure this out someday.... > > Some issues I'm considering as I prepare to order my -6 kit. > > I'm curious about freight cost from Vans to Central NJ. I'm betting I > can save some money and time by ordering the wing and tail kits at the > same time. > > Based on what I've seen on the list most folks seem to take several > months to get to the wings and with the delay time on kits, this might > work out well. > > What about corrosion, if I have parts sitting around for 6 months or > more should they be primed before storage? > > In fact, I've watched the kit price rise slowly over the years (about > $1,000 if I'm not mistaken). Would there be any major disadvantage to > ordering the whole shabang assuming I have the space and a loading > dock for that big beautiful box? > > Dan > RV-6 23101 -------------------------------------------------------- *NOTICE for internet mail*: Any ideas or thoughts expressed here are my own and are independent of my employer. Herman Dierks, Dept. E54S, AWSD Austin, Texas AIX Network Performance Measurement/Analysis phone: TL 678-2831 outside: (512) 838-2831 ZIP: 9632 fax: 512-838-1801 mail: dierks(at)austin.ibm.com VM: DIERKS at AUSVM6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6junkie(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 09, 1995
Subject: Re: Shipping costs
Shipping cost to central NJ as follows (via Roadway) Tail Kit $65 Wing Kit (two boxes) $158 Fuselage $101 Finish Kit (two boxes) $306 Total $630 I picked up each kit at the Phillipsburg distribution station insted of having the kits delivered to my home...saved a lot of money. You will need a pick-up or van to do this (the tail kit fit in my car). When you see how well the boxes are built and packed you will think that the crating charges are a bargin! Doesn't matter if you order all at once or in kits...same number of boxes...same shipping and crating costs. If you do order all of the kits at once and store them you will NOT need to prime parts because they are alclad. Don't scratch 'em and they'll be OK. Good Luck Gary Corde RV-6 N211GC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 1995
From: "Gregg L. Sloan" <gsloan(at)CapAccess.org>
Subject: Re: Shipping costs
On Tue, 8 Aug 1995, Dan Ahearn wrote: > I'm curious about freight cost from Vans to Central NJ. I'm betting I > can save some money and time by ordering the wing and tail kits at the > same time. > Here's my shipping cost to Washington, D.C. area. I picked up the wing and fuselage crates at the local Roadway terminal; saved $35 surcharge on each for residential delivery. Tail Kit - Oct 92, 2 boxes, Shipped UPS $47 Wing kit - Aug 93, 2 crates, $155 Fuselage - May 94, 1 crate, $151 These charges do not include the crating charge. Gregg Sloan_____gsloan(at)capaccess.org_____Herndon, Virginia__USA RV-6A #22425 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 1995
From: klgray(at)bihs.net (Ken Gray)
Subject: Re: Platenuts on inboard wing rib...
>Those plate-nuts on the bottom of the wing are VERY IMPORTANT! They attach >the bottom fuselage skin to the wing and they are STRUCTURAL. The spacing is >2" as they fall between the rivets that attach the root rib and the skin. > You can't drill them untill you fit the wings to the fuselage. > >As for the plate nuts on the top of the wings, they are for the root fairing >and they are also drilled in assembly. > >Gary Corde >RV-6 N211GC > Down in HOOKS Airport in Houston, I found out that they are using blind rivits on the bottom skin to wing attachment. How many times are you going to remove the wings? And if you do, you can drill out the rivits real easy. Just got my N number "N69KG", this was not my first choice. The serial number ends in 69. One person already mentioned about some interesting NOSE ART, I did not consider this when picking my numbers. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JerryFlyRV(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 09, 1995
Subject: Re: Shipping costs
Dan writes... >I'm curious about freight cost from Vans to Central NJ. I'm betting I > can save some money and time by ordering the wing and tail kits at the > same time. Hi Dan Myself I would have loved to have the whole kit setting there just waiting for me to build it. If you have the space and a place to keep it dry and don't let any moisture get between the larger wing skins I would order it all. It would also depend on your building schedule and how soon you want to get started. It would not be good to just leave it in the crates. The money you save might buy you a transponder or whatever. I know that when I built my RV-6 I had to do a lot of waiting for the next kit and that was frustrating. Have you checked into what it cost to ship the whole kit? You might be money ahead to order the whole kit and then take a few days and come pick it up when it is ready, I know other people have done that. Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS PS The price of my RV-6 kit was about $7400.00 dollars when I started it in 1987 I think it is over $10,000 now. ________________________________________________________________________________ for rv-list(at)matronics.com
Date: Aug 09, 1995
From: hovan(at)apple.com (John Hovan)
Subject: Re: Shipping costs (fwd)
Hi All, I believe a change was made to the tail kit shipping process since many people who are flying their RV's remember one box for the tail kit. I just ordered my kit which was shipped on 8/3 and it is coming in two boxes. A 120 pound box and 80 pound box. I believe Van is taking advatage of UPS's cheaper rates. However, UPS will only ship packages weighing less than 130 pounds. Thus the two boxes. Shipping costs from Van's to Austin, TX via UPS were $40.49. My invoice said that some items may be marked B/O for backorder and will be shipped when available. (I hope not too many) Yes, the RV Web page keeper is finally going to stop talking and start building. Holding an invoice, waiting for parts, John http://atlantis.austin.apple.com/people.pages/jhovan/home.html ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 1995
From: "A. Reichert" <reichera(at)clark.net>
Subject: Re: Shipping costs (Dan Ahearn)
One drawback that comes to mind. Currently, when you order a kit from Van's, the kit comes with the latest set of revised plans for the kit. If you ordered the whole thing at once, you would either have to be diligent collecting revisions from the RVAitor, or purchase a revised plans set (I think they are $50 right now, and you can do this once). - Alan | Alan Reichert - Wannabe RV-6 Builder | | Preview plans received! #24179 | | Study...study...look for tools...study.... | |---------------------------------------------| | http://www.clark.net/pub/reichera/home.html | On Tue, 8 Aug 1995, Dan Ahearn wrote: > In fact, I've watched the kit price rise slowly over the years (about > $1,000 if I'm not mistaken). Would there be any major disadvantage to > ordering the whole shabang assuming I have the space and a loading > dock for that big beautiful box? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 1995
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: Re: Shipping costs
Dan Ahearn said: > I'm curious about freight cost from Vans to Central NJ. I'm betting I > can save some money and time by ordering the wing and tail kits at the > same time. I doubt it. They have a crate for the wings, and a crate for the tail. I doubt they'd consolodate them, and even if they could, shipping costs are pretty much by weight. > What about corrosion, if I have parts sitting around for 6 months or > more should they be primed before storage? You need to unpack everything and get the paper away from the metal. Might be a good idea to prime the steel parts pretty soon. Other than that, keep the parts dry and they should be ok. > In fact, I've watched the kit price rise slowly over the years (about > $1,000 if I'm not mistaken). Would there be any major disadvantage to > ordering the whole shabang assuming I have the space and a loading > dock for that big beautiful box? See above about unpacking. Therz LOTS of parts there. Plus the rivets harden with age, makes em harder to buck. Plus you'll miss out on all the latest improvements, which can be significant. The increase in kit prices partly reflect the improvements, but I'll bet they still don't outpace inflation by much. Put your extra $$ in a CD and you'll probably come out ahead. Randall Henderson RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Graves <mgraves(at)ptdcs2.intel.com>
Subject: Re[2]: Wing skins.
Date: Aug 09, 1995
Originally, I asked: > > >>...veteran wing builders..... > > >> a) Is there a way to use only AN rivets? > Earl Brabandt answered> > > a) Yes. Do not rivet inboard "wing walk ribs" to spars until ready > > to rivet skin to that rib. Do it the same way that AN rivets were > > used on the nose rib in the horizontal stab. Just so I understand, Did you do this so you could reach your arms in deeper? Mike Graves RV-6A in box on closet shelf. Made offer on a house with SHOP :-)) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: James Caufield <caufield(at)sequent.com>
Subject: Storing kits
Date: Aug 09, 1995
> If you do order all of the kits at once and store them you will NOT need to > prime parts because they are alclad. Don't scratch 'em and they'll be OK. ...but you *will* have to unpack them prior to storage. Van ships them with paper as packing material. Paper will absorb moisture and rapidly corrode your parts if it is not substituted with something like plastic. Takes time, but consider the alternative. From: Cessna337(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 09, 1995
Subject: UNSUBSCRIBE
Unsubscribe, please. I'm up to my eyeballs in E-mail. I'd rather read the notes in a forum where I can select what I want instead of getting deluged with E-mail. Important notices and construction changes are OK to broadcast but I'm getting to much "chit chat" and useless garble. I found a Van's group on the WWW so I can read all the same stuff there since the broadcast stuff is placed there daily. Thanks anyway, but "STOP THE FLOOD"!!! H. J. Brasel alias Cessna337(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 1995
From: "Stephen M. Brown" <smbrown(at)cisco.com>
Subject: US Tools dimplimg tools
Just received my US Tool dimpling/rivet fixture. Problem is the two halves that meet the rivet are out of lateral alignment by at least 3/8". Haven't try to adjust this yet, can this be realigned or is it returned? On a related note, is this an acceptable forum for discussing vendor quality?? Not looking to bash anyone just want to avoid unpleasant mistakes, like the one above. BTW I didn't get this from US Tool. -- Steve Brown System Engineer Cisco Systems - Phoenix ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 1995
From: Jeffrey Hall <jhall(at)fortnet.org>
Subject: shipping costs
Dan, I had my tail and wing kit exposed to the decidedly liquid atmosphere of Michigan for a few years in my garage workshop, and found no trouble with corrosion, with the exception of the vert. stab., which was laying on cardboard for a little while. Something in the cardboard attacked the alclad. (Bummer!) There are very few steel parts, and these can be primed when recieved. I say go for it... Jeff ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Graves <mgraves(at)ptdcs2.intel.com>
Subject: good news
Date: Aug 09, 1995
John Hovan wrote: > Yes, the RV Web page keeper is finally going to stop talking and start building. > > Holding an invoice, waiting for parts, > John > > A round of applause please, That's the best news i've heard all day! BTW, Thanks for keeping up the home page, John. I was blissfully ignorant about this list until I found the RV page. Mike Graves RV-6A in box on closet shelf Offer made on house. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: jeayers(at)CCGATE.HAC.COM
Date: Aug 09, 1995
Subject: Re[2]: Wing skins.
>Gary A. Sobek 20480 N-157GS asked; >Does someone think that 1 piece skins look several hundred dollars better? YES!! (sorry for yelling. Gary must have forgotten that I read this list.) Jim Ayers LOM RV-3 S/N 50 Maroon Marauder Single piece center section skin (sorry I couldn't resist) Wing tanks with .032 single piece leading edge skin (Don't try this at home) BTW the early plans were good, but they were not as nice as what Van has now. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: gil(at)rassp.hac.com (Gil Alexander)
Subject: Re: Shipping costs (chatter)
>Dan Ahearn said: >> I'm curious about freight cost from Vans to Central NJ. I'm betting I **** good stuff cut out **** >the latest improvements, which can be significant. The increase in kit >prices partly reflect the improvements, but I'll bet they still don't >outpace inflation by much. Put your extra $$ in a CD and you'll >probably come out ahead. True for Vans kits, but not for Lycoming engines :^( I wish I had bought a new, pickled Lycoming from Van when I first started. It's appreciation would have beaten most of my investments! ... Gil Alexander .. holding on to a 1800TT O-320-E2G ... but it's cost and rebuild cost will probably exceed the 1989 new Lycoming cost :^( > >Randall Henderson >RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 1995
From: Jeffrey Hall <jhall(at)fortnet.org>
Subject: Re: US Tools dimplimg tools
Stephen, I have replaced most of the tools that I bought from US Tool, quality left much to be desired. Avery tools dimpling/rivet tool has been flawless. Also, again on the "shipping Costs" subject, my wing skins were left in the crate with the paper for quite some time, okay, years, and have had no corrosion. This was in Michigan, and it is HUMID there, (big reason that I left, but that is another story...) Jeff RV4 2179 (hey, I'm working on it again, okay!!??) On Wed, 9 Aug 1995, Stephen M. Brown wrote: > Just received my US Tool dimpling/rivet fixture. Problem is the two halves > that meet the rivet are out of lateral alignment by at least 3/8". Haven't > try to adjust this yet, can this be realigned or is it returned? > > On a related note, is this an acceptable forum for discussing vendor > quality?? Not looking to bash anyone just want to avoid unpleasant mistakes, > like the one above. BTW I didn't get this from US Tool. > -- > Steve Brown > System Engineer > Cisco Systems - Phoenix > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 1995
From: Frank K Justice <Frank_K_Justice(at)ccm.ssd.intel.com>
Subject: Ordering more than one kit at a time
Let me repeat the prime directive: Order the kits individually in order for them to arrive when you are ready. You can call Van's anytime and get lead times so you will know how far ahead to order. Reasons: (Summary of traffic) 1.Van's constantly makes improvements and fixes. I would be kicking myself all the way across the parking lot now if I had ordered all my kits at once. I figure they have eliminated about 250 hours of work in the past three years. 2.The plans and drawings will be the latest. 3. The rivets will not have hardened up (that is a real pain and can cause many hours of extra work) 4. You won't lose any money (Van's prices don't seem to go up any faster than inflation plus improvements) 5. You need to do the inventory within 30 days. 6. Parts can rust and corrode unless you handle them properly. 7. The stuff takes up a lot of storage space 8. You may have to give up the project and you won't be able to sell old kits for nearly what you paid for them. FKJ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 1995
From: Richard Chandler <mauser(at)Claris.COM>
Subject: Re: shipping costs
> Dan, I had my tail and wing kit exposed to the decidedly liquid > atmosphere of Michigan for a few years in my garage workshop, and found > no trouble with corrosion, with the exception of the vert. stab., > which was laying on cardboard for a little while. Something in > the cardboard attacked the alclad. (Bummer!) There are very few > steel parts, and these can be primed when recieved. I say go for it... > Jeff The problem with Cardboard, and most cheap paper for that matter, is that it is not acid-free. It's why your old comic books and newspaper clippings turn yellow. That explains what attacked your Alclad. The moisture allowed the acids in the cardboard to become free. -- "Wait a minute, you expect us innocent children to climb up dangerous scaffolding and paint naked people all over a church? We'll do it!!" -- Yakko Warner, Animaniacs "Yeah, I've got ADD, you wanna make something of.... oooh, cool. Look!" ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dralle (Matt G. Dralle 1+ 510-447-9886)
Date: Aug 09, 1995
Subject: Test Message
Test message, please ignore. Matt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 1995
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Wing skins.
> > > .... Do not rivet inboard "wing walk ribs" to spars until ready > > > to rivet skin to that rib. Do it the same way that AN rivets were > > > used on the nose rib in the horizontal stab. > > > Just so I understand, Did you do this so you could reach your arms in deeper? > > > Mike Graves Yes. The inboard ribs, being close together like they are, are a pain to rivet with all of them in there, but with this method you can remove them and insert and rivet them to the skin one rib at a time. It also helps if the factory heads of the rivets that hold the aft spar flange strips to the spar are on the inside (forward side) of the spar where they're adjacent to these ribs. This makes it easier to slide the ribs over them when removing and inserting them. Check out Frank Justice's instructions for more detail on this. Randall Henderson RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dralle (Matt G. Dralle 1+ 510-447-9886)
Date: Aug 09, 1995
Subject: Test Message, Again...
I'm optimizing the RV-LIST mailer. Already, I've gotten the message processing to 45 seconds from about 15 minutes... Wow! Sorry for the bother... Matt ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dralle (Matt G. Dralle 1+ 510-447-9886)
Date: Aug 09, 1995
Subject: One Last Test... Sorry.
I promise... This is the last test. You'll thank me later! Matt ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JamesCone(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 09, 1995
Subject: Re: micro monitor engine instrument system
The micro monitor is everything that the ads say it is. It took me 19 1/2 hours to build and support was great when I had any questions. It worked like a charm, no problems ever. Get the fuel flow sensor option. When it says you have burned 6.2 gallons of fuel out of a full tank, you cannot get 6.3 gallons in when you fill up again. I started totally ignoring my fuel guages after I gained confidence in it. I knew how much the tanks held when full and could tell exactly to the tenth of a gallon how much fuel I had left and exactly how much endurance remained. This is a great system. BTW, I got a canon plug from an electronics store and mounted it permanently to the firewall. The wires from the engine plug into the firewall fixture. This will make taking the engine off much easier. I never thought too much about this on my first project, ( a sea hawk) and had to take the engine out three times. Each time I had to undo all of the wires. Live and learn. The system weighs practically nothing and takes up very little panel space. Jim Cone ________________________________________________________________________________
From: TommyLewis(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 10, 1995
Subject: Comments on Garmin GPS 90
Reply to Don's questions about Garmin 90: >Tom, tell me about the Garmin 90. How hard do you think it would be to >mount in an RV-6? Is the antenae fixed or can it be moved? I am very impressed by the Garmin 90 unit. It is small, about size of TV remote, would mount easily on panel of RV. I looked at this unit at Sun & Fun, and was concerned about the size of the LCD display. After returning home and looking closer at a unit that a friend bought, I was convinced it was useable. After buying it at Oshkosh, and flying home with it, I am even more convinced it is a very useable product. The moving map was great, I had thought it was a toy, I found it a very useful navigation tool. The cursor key works well with the few other control keys, I found it easy to learn. The antenna is small, connects with BNC connector, so to remote antenna, it comes with about a 4-5 foot coax cable. It uses 4 AA batteries, but I wired a connector into my cessna so I can plug into power. > You were able to make a long flight back to TX on the 90 with no problems? >Loss of signals? No problem picking up GPS, no loss of signal at all. We make a short side trip to stop at Amana, Iowa, for lunch. The 2800 foot grass strip was in the database, had a great lunch of family style german food. The GPS worked well, however, our 604 loran had trouble switching chains so it did not work. Still working on RV6A, have first flap ready to rivet together, hopefully this weekend. TommyLewis(at)AOL.COM ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1995
From: "David A. Barnhart" <barnhart(at)crl.com>
Subject: Re: US Tools dimplimg tools
On Wed, 9 Aug 1995, Stephen M. Brown wrote: > On a related note, is this an acceptable forum for discussing vendor > quality?? Not looking to bash anyone just want to avoid unpleasant mistakes, > like the one above. BTW I didn't get this from US Tool. I think this is a perfect forum for discussing vendor quality. ANd to put in my $.02 worth: I've never been disapointed in anything I've bought from Avery. Best Regards, Dave Barnhart rv-6 sn 23744 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1995
From: Chris Ruble <cruble(at)cisco.com>
Subject: Re: US Tools dimplimg tools
> > I think this is a perfect forum for discussing vendor quality. > ANd to put in my $.02 worth: I've never been disapointed in > anything I've bought from Avery. > > Best Regards, > Dave Barnhart > rv-6 sn 23744 > > Same here, and they are nice people to deal with. That may not mean very much to some people but I place it high on the list. They run a family biz and are RVers too. What more can you ask for. Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1995
From: Gary Standley <Gary_Standley(at)ccm.ssd.intel.com>
Subject: Re[2]: US Tools dimplimg tools
Text item: Back in the OLDEN days when I was building an RV4 I got many of my tools from US. They were marginal at best. Avery was just getting started supplying tools and a small selection. Since I've begun working on the RV3 prototype re-build I have accumulated (bought/borrowed) tools that come from Avery. They are far superior of anything I have from US. I recommend Avery very strongly. They are still small enough to care. ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Re: US Tools dimplimg tools Date: 8/10/95 8:25 AM On Wed, 9 Aug 1995, Stephen M. Brown wrote: > On a related note, is this an acceptable forum for discussing vendor > quality?? Not looking to bash anyone just want to avoid unpleasant mistakes, > like the one above. BTW I didn't get this from US Tool. I think this is a perfect forum for discussing vendor quality. ANd to put in my $.02 worth: I've never been disapointed in anything I've bought from Avery. Best Regards, Dave Barnhart rv-6 sn 23744 Text item: External Message Header The following mail header is for administrative use and may be ignored unless there are problems. ***IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS SAVE THESE HEADERS***. Subject: Re: US Tools dimplimg tools From: "David A. Barnhart" <crl.com!barnhart(at)matronics.com> Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 08:25:27 -0700 (PDT) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1995
From: Jeremy <jbenedic(at)uofport.edu>
Subject: Van's on WWW - Aug. 10 Update
The development for the home page is pretty much on schedule for a previously anticipated release date of August 15. However, while the development is on schedule, a complication has come forth. The network that we had planned to put the home page on has suddenly and unexpectedly reversed their red-tape policily and denied all WWW access. Because of this, the release date will be delayed until further notice (ie. a temporary site is found). Suggestions are still welcome, and development is still underway. I wish to thank those who have given suggestions and encouragement to the development process. I am currently about 700 e-mails behind, so I have not had a chance to respond to everyone personally yet. BTW, a good portion of the e-mails are from the rv-list, but I'm not complaining about the volume at all (nobody is forcing anyone to read any e-mail). Also for those who suggested viewing John Hovan's page, YES, I am aware of his presence. All attempts are being made to create a site that complements what he has already. Jeremy ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 10, 1995
Subject: alternators the easy way
I have just fitted an alt. to my modified -4, and I can tell you that a Chevy Sprint/ Geo Metro will virtually BOLT ON to stock lyc. brackets. I used a Generator mount and arm (these should be cheap to find) and had to grind a small amount from the rear of the front boss of the alt. A spacer is also necessary at the rear mount boss of the alt. I don't have the p/n of the mount bracket, but the arm p/n is 75380. This alt. is 35A, internal regulated single wire hookup with a dummy light wire also. The 540 gen. mount works the same way, with the same arm. I told you it was modified. Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Graves <mgraves(at)ptdcs2.intel.com>
Subject: alternators the easy way
Date: Aug 10, 1995
Mark wrote: > > I have just fitted an alt. to my modified -4, and I can tell you that a > Chevy Sprint/ Geo Metro will virtually BOLT ON to stock lyc. brackets. I used > a Generator mount and arm (these should be cheap to find) and had to grind a > small amount from the rear of the front boss of the alt. A spacer is also > necessary at the rear mount boss of the alt. I don't have the p/n of the > mount bracket, but the arm p/n is 75380. This alt. is 35A, internal regulated > single wire hookup with a dummy light wire also. The 540 gen. mount works the > same way, with the same arm. I told you it was modified. I don't know much about airplanes electrical systems. Do we install 12 volt or 24 volt systems today? From the message above I assume it is 12 volt, but I'm not sure if it is. I hope Mark's Chevy generator is reliable enough to last a while. I'd be interested to know how it works out. Mike Graves RV-6A in box on closet shelf Offer pending on house (WITH SHOP!) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Greatav8or(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 10, 1995
Subject: Re: UNSUBSCRIBE
>Unsubscribe, please. I'm up to my eyeballs in E-mail. I'd rather read the >notes in a forum where I can select what I want instead of getting deluged >with E-mail. Important notices and construction changes are OK to broadcast >but I'm getting to much "chit chat" and useless garble. I found a Van's group >on the WWW so I can read all the same stuff there since the broadcast stuff >is placed there daily. Thanks anyway, but "STOP THE FLOOD"!!! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1995
From: "David A. Barnhart" <barnhart(at)crl.com>
Subject: Lesson number 863
OK, folks, you can laugh if you want. Now that I've finished building my first wing tank, I thought I'd pass along my only minor hitch: I remembered to check the vent line to see that is was clear... AFTER I entirely finished sealing the tank AAAAUUUUUUGGGGGGHHHHHH! Somewhere during the process of building the tank, I managed to get just enough pro-seal into the vent line fitting on the inner end rib that it was entirely plugged. That rib now has TWO access plates :-) So, lesson number 863 is: Check the vent line BEFORE sealing down the tank baffle! Best Regards, Dave Barnhart rv-6 sn 23744 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: kksys!showpg!jpl (Joe Larson)
Subject: Wing skins -or- I've GOT to meet this guy
Date: Aug 11, 1995
> Van's answer was: > > "The single skin is heavier; you don't get performance by > being lazy." Why do I think an hour's conversation with Van would be very informative and interesting? -J -- Joe Larson jpl(at)showpg.mn.org 612-595-9690(w) Showpage Software, Inc. 435 Ford Rd, Suite 315 St. Louis Park, Mn 55426 Future RV-6A pilot. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Cessna337(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 11, 1995
Subject: Fwd: UNSUBSCRIBE
--------------------- From: aol.com!Cessna337(at)matronics.com Date: 95-08-09 17:48:28 EDT Unsubscribe, please. I'm up to my eyeballs in E-mail. I'd rather read the notes in a forum where I can select what I want instead of getting deluged with E-mail. Important notices and construction changes are OK to broadcast but I'm getting to much "chit chat" and useless garble. I found a Van's group on the WWW so I can read all the same stuff there since the broadcast stuff is placed there daily. Thanks anyway, but "STOP THE FLOOD"!!! H. J. Brasel alias Cessna337(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: kksys!showpg!jpl (Joe Larson)
Subject: Houses with shops
Date: Aug 11, 1995
> From: Michael Graves <ptdcs2.intel.com!mgraves(at)matronics.com> > Made offer on a house with SHOP :-)) Deja vu. My wife and I spent last Sunday stopping in at open houses. Typical conversations included things like: "Hmm. Those windows look like they pop out." "3-car garage. Well, one of the cars will fit." "I don't think I could get the fuselage out that basement walkout door, but could build the wings down here." While she was looking at kitchens and bathrooms and such, I was checking out garages and walkout basements and difficulty in running 60-amp service to each of them.... -J -- Joe Larson jpl(at)showpg.mn.org 612-595-9690(w) Showpage Software, Inc. 435 Ford Rd, Suite 315 St. Louis Park, Mn 55426 Future RV-6A pilot. ________________________________________________________________________________ for rv-list(at)matronics.com
Date: Aug 11, 1995
From: hovan(at)apple.com (John Hovan)
Subject: Primer Questions
Hi All, After a bit of research and digging through the RV archives, I think I am going to use either Dexter's AZKO primer or Desoto's Super Koropon primer. Does anyone know if AZKO is a self etching, zinc chromate primer? Does it meet all the rigorous military specs? Aircraft Spruce could not provide me this info. Also, does anyone know if Desoto is still in business. There number provided a few years back in the RV archives has been disconnected. thanks, John ps. One correction to my previous note on shipping weights. The tail kit consists of two boxes. One approx. 80 pound box with all the metal parts and a 24 pound box with wood jigs. (Kit was ordered on 8/2 and arrived on 8/9! All fiberglass parts for the tail section are backordered.) Here was the past info on Desoto Primers from the RV-Archives... Super Koropon - PN K515-700 Color - light green Pot life - 8 hours clean-up - MEK or similar surface pre-prep - alodyne (not required, but recommended "for maximum corrosion proofing") Cost - 2 gallon kit of primer/activator 1 to 5 kits - $48 6 to 11 kits - $35 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Graves <mgraves(at)ptdcs2.intel.com>
Subject: re:shop
Date: Aug 11, 1995
> > > > > Mike Graves > > > > RV-6A in box on closet shelf > > Offer pending on house (WITH SHOP!) > > ...but no water, sewage or electricity! 8-) > > > > > OK JIM! My secret is out :-) The house has no power, water, sewer, gas or telephone. Obviously this requires a unique approach to building an RV. Some ideas I've been considering are: a) building the paper RV previously discussed on this channel. b) installing a giant pitot tube on the roof for compressed air. c) mounting a large scotchbrite wheel to an exercise bike to act as a bench grinder. d) mounting a hand crank a a drill press. (remember the brace and bit?) e) paying to have the utilities re-connected. (they were severed due to new construction. BTW, did Wilbur and Orville have compressed air and power? Mike Graves RV-6A in box on closet shelf Offer pending on house (WITH SHOP!) OK,OK, no power, sewer, water, gas, phone.... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Graves <mgraves(at)ptdcs2.intel.com>
Subject: Houses with shops
Date: Aug 11, 1995
Joe Larson Wrote: > Deja vu. My wife and I spent last Sunday stopping in at open houses. > Typical conversations included things like: > > "Hmm. Those windows look like they pop out." > > "3-car garage. Well, one of the cars will fit." > > "I don't think I could get the fuselage out that basement walkout door, > but could build the wings down here." > > While she was looking at kitchens and bathrooms and such, I was checking > out garages and walkout basements and difficulty in running 60-amp service > to each of them.... I envied some of you guys that have garages, so I was interested in the MLS listing which described a "detached 2 car garage". Expecting the worst, I looked at it. Ironicly, the shop is in better condition than the house. Price was too good to pass up. My advice to prospective home buyers: do a lot of research, These older homes my require much upgrading before real work can begin. Mike Graves RV-6A in box on closet shelf offer made on shop (WITH HOUSE!) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1995
From: dahearn(at)attmail.com (Dan Ahearn)
Subject: Avionics (chatter)
Thanks for all regarding the shipping advice, I think Frank summed it up quite well. Empennage and wings this fall! Avioncis question: has anyone been able to successfully mount a nav and com antenna within the fiberglass wing tips (or tail section). I did see some pics of a tape antenna on a -6 canopy. I would imagine you could put a GPS antenna right on the glare shield of a tip up canopy. Dan RV-6 23101 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1995
From: gil(at)rassp.hac.com (Gil Alexander)
Subject: Re: Primer Questions
>Hi All, > >After a bit of research and digging through the RV archives, I think I am >going to use either Dexter's AZKO primer or Desoto's Super Koropon primer. > >Does anyone know if AZKO is a self etching, zinc chromate primer? Does it >meet all the rigorous military specs? Aircraft Spruce could not provide me >this info. John ... This division of AKZO was bought out by Dexter Aerospace, and this is what the cans should say. If they are still labelled AKZO, then at leasst 1/2 of the 2 year shelf life is gone!! It meets a MacDonald-Douglas spec. for "fluid resistant primer (interior)" and is equivalent to the MIL STD 23377 epoxy primers. These two primers - Dexter and DeSoto - have the same properties as the MIL STD, but are easier to mix and apply, and have a much quicker "tack-free" drying time. It is strontium chromate based (the modern replacement for zinc chromate) and is NOT self-etching. A seperate Alumiprep/ScotchBrite application before priming should be fine, and folow with alodyne if you want to go the whole way. I have a full data sheet somewhere at home if you need any more specific data. The data for the Dexter primer is almost identical to that for "Koropon" shown below. I prefer acetone for cleanup, but MEK or lacquer thinner also work. Unused paint can be stored in the refrigerator for a day or two if you can get it past your spouse! ... Gil Alexander ... finished roll over cabin frame > Also, does anyone know if Desoto is still in business. There >number provided a few years back in the RV archives has been disconnected. > >thanks, >John > >ps. One correction to my previous note on shipping weights. The tail kit >consists of two boxes. One approx. 80 pound box with all the metal parts >and a 24 pound box with wood jigs. (Kit was ordered on 8/2 and arrived on >8/9! All fiberglass parts for the tail section are backordered.) > > >Here was the past info on Desoto Primers from the RV-Archives... > Super Koropon - PN K515-700 > Color - light green > Pot life - 8 hours > clean-up - MEK or similar > surface pre-prep - alodyne (not required, but recommended > "for maximum corrosion proofing") > Cost - 2 gallon kit of primer/activator > 1 to 5 kits - $48 > 6 to 11 kits - $35 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Graves <mgraves(at)ptdcs2.intel.com>
Subject: primer
Date: Aug 11, 1995
Note for Randall Henderson and others At the Portland RV-ators builder group meeting at your house last night, I noticed that your empennage was primed with a greenish-yellow primer inside and out. Does the entire surface of the airplane need this treatment? Does the finish paint stick better with this primer? I'm familiar with painting steel, but not aluminum. BTW guys, I think Randall gets the award for longest, narrowest shop! :-) Mike Graves RV-6A in box on closet shelf offer pending on house ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1995
From: Gary Standley <Gary_Standley(at)ccm.ssd.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Wing skins -or- I've GOT to meet this guy
Text item: You've got to understand where Van is coming from. His first kit plane was a single place RV3 "sport" airplane. No frills, just fun. Then the pressure came for two seats, thus the RV4. I remember when the first guys were going to O-360's and constant speed props and Van didn't condone it one bit. Basically, what it boils down to is Van designed an airplane for a purpose and the design did everything he wanted it to. Why would anyone want take his creation and mess with it. Of course a lot of neat things have come about with people "messing" with the airplanes. Especially with the RV6's. Some of them are more plush than first class in a 747. Hardly the cute little "fighter" of the RV3 era. Van is an interesting person to talk to and conceptualize with. His brother Jerry (an airline pilot) is very interesting too. By the way, for those of you who may not know Jerry's daughter Denise is an airline pilot also. She is checked out in the type aircraft as her Dad and they have flown pilot/co-pilot. So, when they're driving you're really in good hands. 'Nuff chatter. Some people don't like it and it's taking time from my day job. ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Wing skins -or- I've GOT to meet this guy Date: 8/11/95 8:47 AM > Van's answer was: > > "The single skin is heavier; you don't get performance by > being lazy." Why do I think an hour's conversation with Van would be very informative and interesting? -J -- Joe Larson jpl(at)showpg.mn.org 612-595-9690(w) Showpage Software, Inc. 435 Ford Rd, Suite 315 St. Louis Park, Mn 55426 Future RV-6A pilot. Text item: External Message Header The following mail header is for administrative use and may be ignored unless there are problems. ***IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS SAVE THESE HEADERS***. Date: Fri, 11 Aug 1995 08:47:01 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Wing skins -or- I've GOT to meet this guy From: kksys!showpg!jpl(at)matronics.com (Joe Larson) .1) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1995
From: Gary Standley <Gary_Standley(at)ccm.ssd.intel.com>
Subject: Re[2]: shop
Text item: I don't know if the Wright's had compressed air but they did have "gas" from time to time. ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: re:shop Date: 8/11/95 9:03 AM > > > > > Mike Graves > > > > RV-6A in box on closet shelf > > Offer pending on house (WITH SHOP!) > > ...but no water, sewage or electricity! 8-) > > > > > OK JIM! My secret is out :-) The house has no power, water, sewer, gas or telephone. Obviously this requires a unique approach to building an RV. Some ideas I've been considering are: a) building the paper RV previously discussed on this channel. b) installing a giant pitot tube on the roof for compressed air. c) mounting a large scotchbrite wheel to an exercise bike to act as a bench grinder. d) mounting a hand crank a a drill press. (remember the brace and bit?) e) paying to have the utilities re-connected. (they were severed due to new construction. BTW, did Wilbur and Orville have compressed air and power? Mike Graves RV-6A in box on closet shelf Offer pending on house (WITH SHOP!) OK,OK, no power, sewer, water, gas, phone.... Text item: External Message Header The following mail header is for administrative use and may be ignored unless there are problems. ***IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS SAVE THESE HEADERS***. Date: Fri, 11 Aug 95 9:03:38 PDT Subject: re:shop From: Michael Graves <ptdcs2.intel.com!mgraves(at)matronics.com> A03353 0 ) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RUSS_NICHOLS_at_SAC__DATA__PROCESSING(at)fire.ca.gov
Date: Aug 11, 1995
>From RUSS_NICHOLS_at_SAC__DATA__PROCESSING Fri Aug 11 10:24:22 0700 1995 remote from fire.ca.gov
Date: Aug 11, 1995
From: RUSS_NICHOLS_at_SAC__DATA__PROCESSING(at)fire.ca.gov (RUSS NICHOLS) Subject: Re: Primer Questions This is a Mime message, which your current mail reader may not understand. Parts of the message will appear as text. To process the rest, you will have to use a Mime compatible mail reader. Contact your vendor for details. --IMA.Boundary.808161731 John, I just finished doing exactly the same thing. I decided to go with the Akzo. It is an epoxy based, NON-etching primer. It meets MIL-P-23377, type 1, class 1 specs. Gil Alexander was able to provide me with A LOT of very good information about primers and the spec. I looked for Desoto, too. I'm guessing that they were bought out by Courtauld's. Courtauld's Berkley address happens to be exactly the same as the address listed for Desoto in the RV archive. Courtauld's also has a product called Desoclean. Could be just a coincidence... Aircraft Spruce has Akzo in stock. (They had 2 kits until I ordered one a couple of days ago...) I paid $88 for the 2 gal. kit. Of course, there is a "nominal" hazmat fee for shipping. Courtauld's (part no. 513x390) also meets the spec. It runs $77 for the 2 gallon kit, but they don't have any in stock. It is not an etching primer, either. From the info that I could find, both the Akzo and Courtauld's are VERY hard and stick VERY well, even though they aren't etching primers. I'm doing alumiprep and alodine under the primer, so an etching primer wasn't as much of a concern for me. I think that both Akzo and Courtauld's have strontium chromate (the approved replacement for zinc chromate). The only thing I've used to date is Tempo's Zinc Oxide, so most of this info is research and "wisdom" from some VERY helpful people on the RV list. Go forth and prime... Russ Nichols ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Primer Questions Date: 8/11/95 8:47 AM Does anyone know if AZKO is a self etching, zinc chromate primer? Does it meet all the rigorous military specs? Also, does anyone know if Desoto is still in business. There number provided a few years back in the RV archives has been disconnected. --IMA.Boundary.808161731-- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1995
From: Earl W Brabandt <Earl_W_Brabandt(at)ccm.jf.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Wing skins -or- I've GOT to meet this guy -- chatter
Text item: Joe speculates: > Why do I think an hour's conversation with Van would be very > informative and interesting? Yes it would be -- except that Van is very humble and reserved, and he doesn't seem to enjoy talking much. I think it would be unusual to sustain a conversation with him for an entire hour. Calin -J -- Joe Larson jpl(at)showpg.mn.org 612-595-9690(w) Showpage Software, Inc. 435 Ford Rd, Suite 315 St. Louis Park, Mn 55426 Future RV-6A pilot. Text item: External Message Header The following mail header is for administrative use and may be ignored unless there are problems. ***IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS SAVE THESE HEADERS***. Date: Fri, 11 Aug 1995 08:47:01 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Wing skins -or- I've GOT to meet this guy From: kksys!showpg!jpl(at)matronics.com (Joe Larson) .1) 4.1) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1995
From: Frank K Justice <Frank_K_Justice(at)ccm.ssd.intel.com>
Subject: Re: primer
Text item: >At the Portland RV-ators builder group meeting at your house last night, I >noticed that your empennage was primed with a greenish-yellow primer >inside and out. Does the entire surface of the airplane need this >treatment? Does the >finish paint stick better with this primer? I'm familiar with painting steel, >but not aluminum. You need to prime the outside for good adhesion of finish coats, but most primers indicate that the finish coat should be put on soon after the primer for or else you must roughen the primer. We will sometimes put primer on the outside of pieces we expect to sit around for a long time as a way of protecting them from corrosion and scratches. FKJ Text item: External Message Header The following mail header is for administrative use and may be ignored unless there are problems. ***IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS SAVE THESE HEADERS***. Date: Fri, 11 Aug 95 10:00:34 PDT Subject: primer From: Michael Graves <ptdcs2.intel.com!mgraves(at)matronics.com> A04428 0 ) 4.1) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1995
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: Re: primer
I think I got a bit carried away with the paint gun early in my project. Since doing my empennage I've heard several reasons not to prime the exterior surfaces until it comes time to finish paint. One reason is that unless you know for sure what finish paint you're going to use, your primer may not be compatible. Also I've heard that the finish paint adheres better to the primer if it hasn't cured for too long. I'm not too worried about it, but I won't be priming exterior surfaces any more until I'm ready to paint. Randall Henderson RV-6 Shop dimensions: 12' wide by 40' looong (including paint/wing storage room) > At the Portland RV-ators builder group meeting at your house last night, I > noticed that your empennage was primed with a greenish-yellow primer inside and out. Does the entire surface of the airplane need this treatment? Does the > finish paint stick better with this primer? I'm familiar with painting steel, > but not aluminum. > > BTW guys, I think Randall gets the award for longest, narrowest shop! :-) > > > Mike Graves > > RV-6A in box on closet shelf > offer pending on house > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: steve_kimura(at)om.cv.hp.com
Date: Aug 11, 1995
Subject: Solid crank and C/S prop?
Item Subject: Text_1 I just saw this ad in rec.aviation.marketplace. This may be a dumb question, but how can you have a C/S prop and a solid crank? > 1979 Bellanca Super Decathlon. 180 hp Lycoming with constant > speed propeller. Fully aerobatic with inverted fuel and oil > systems. 930 total time air frame, 10 hours on the engine since > factory remanufacture with solid crankshaft, 150 SPOH. No damage > history. Complete logs available... Steve Kimura kimuras(at)peak.org -6A plans, builder's conference next week! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dierks(at)austin.ibm.com
Subject: Avionics (chatter)
Date: Aug 11, 1995
> Avioncis question: has anyone been able to successfully mount a nav and > com antenna within the fiberglass wing tips (or tail section). I did > see some pics of a tape antenna on a -6 canopy. I would imagine you > could put a GPS antenna right on the glare shield of a tip up canopy. > The comm antenna should be mounted vertical for best results. Therefor, the wingtips are not well suited for the comm. That is why you see it on the windshield of Van's RV6. I thing some may tried the wing tips, maybe even Van. I think there was an article on this in one of the RV newsletters. Herman ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dierks(at)austin.ibm.com
Subject: Solid crank and C/S prop? (fwd)
Date: Aug 11, 1995
They may be refering to the prop flange on the crank. Lots of the cranks have lightning holes in the flange. For aerobatics, there is an AD or SB on this that requires an inspection each 25 Hrs if a crank with the lightning holes is used for aerobatics. It also says to replace the crank with a solid flange crank on the next OH. I think folks that don't really understand that there are 'solid core' cranks (vs hollow shaft for CS prop) and then there are solid flange (vs flange with lightning holes). Therefore, they just throw around the term 'solid crank'. I think in this case it is 'hollow' but with the later style solid flange. FYI, there are also several thicknesses of flanges around. The later style has a thicker flange as well. Herman > From root Fri Aug 11 15:29:59 1995 > From: om.cv.hp.com!steve_kimura(at)matronics.com > Subject: Solid crank and C/S prop? > > I just saw this ad in rec.aviation.marketplace. This may be a dumb > question, but how can you have a C/S prop and a solid crank? > > > 1979 Bellanca Super Decathlon. 180 hp Lycoming with constant > > speed propeller. Fully aerobatic with inverted fuel and oil > > systems. 930 total time air frame, 10 hours on the engine since > > factory remanufacture with solid crankshaft, 150 SPOH. No damage > > history. Complete logs available... > Herman Dierks, Dept. E54S, AWSD Austin, Texas ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1995
From: J.Ken_Hitchmough(at)magic.ca (J.Ken Hitchmough)
Subject: Re: Lesson number 863
Dave Barnhart wrote... >So, lesson number 863 is: Check the vent line BEFORE sealing down >the tank baffle! So, lesson number 864 must be... wait for it.... Make sure the float is on your fuel sender arm BEFORE you seal in your tank. Beat that!! Ken RV-6A (which now has floats on both senders!!) -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Magic Online Services Toronto Inc. (416) 591-6490 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1995
From: "Stephen M. Brown" <smbrown(at)cisco.com>
Subject: Re: US Tools dimplimg tools
:-( No one has yet answered my question... and I don't know if this thing is any good. Appreciate the plugs for Avery, I found them *after* ordering this from Aircraft Spruce; I now feel the same as the other comments, spoke with Judy once or twice. Also didn't know about this list when ordering the first set of tools :-( :-( Would it be best to return this to Aircraft Spruce and purchase from Avery?? that's what I'd really like to do. ~$189 vs $110. Anyone ever try to return things to Aircraft Spruce?? -- Steve Brown System Engineer Cisco Systems - Phoenix ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1995
From: ammeterj(at)ammeterj.seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re: Are Videos Worth It??? Right side brakes??
Regards right side brakes: I had no time in taildraggers and my flight instructor wouldn't fly right seat unless the brakes were installed. After he felt comfortable with me and I had trouble getting all the air out of the right side lines I removed the right side brakes. On my bi-annual he hardly even noticed their absence. >I purchased George and Becky Orndorff's Empennage and Wing construction >videos. The Emp. video was quite helpful as I was totally "green". I >found the wing video to be entertaining but not as useful. Now that I >am starting the Fuselage, I am wondering if I should spring the $50 for >this video. Any comments???? > >Now that I'm writing, what about right side brakes?? I don't see the >point. ( I bet you -4 and -3 builders don't either!!!!!) > >Ross Mickey >Still F605 (why is this seat belt bracket so ***##!@@ close to the edge >of the F-605B????) > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1995
rv-list(at)matronics.com
From: ammeterj(at)ammeterj.seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re: wing skins
--=====================_808189492==_ A) Yes B) Not really I am including an article that Jim Morgan and I wrote about a method to build a wing without using "Pop Rivets". I have also been working on a compilation of past articles from the Puget Sound RVators; it will have about 60 articles that should be of interest both to the builder and to the flyer (and even to the dreamer). When the "book" is done you will be the first to know. John Ammeter N16JA 200+ hours >Hi folks! > I have a question for you veteran wing builders. >I understand that it can be difficult (or impossible) to close a wing using AN >rivets everywhere, requiring pop rivets in a couple of tight spots. > > a) Is there a way to use only AN rivets? > > b) Does the one-piece skin help or hinder this? > > Mike Graves > >RV-6A in box on closet shelf > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1995
jpl%showpg%kksys.com(at)matronics.com, rv-list(at)matronics.com
From: ammeterj(at)ammeterj.seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re: Wing skins -or- I've GOT to meet this guy -- chatter
I've known Van for over 8 years now and, as president of the Puget Sound RVators, occasionally have reason to talk to him. It IS unusual to sustain his interest for over 30 minutes. Not his fault, he just doesn't seem to enjoy mindless babbling. If you have a serious topic he WILL listen to you. John Ammeter RV-6 N16JA > >Text item: > >Joe speculates: > >> Why do I think an hour's conversation with Van would be very >> informative and interesting? > >Yes it would be -- except that Van is very humble and reserved, and he >doesn't seem to enjoy talking much. I think it would be unusual to >sustain a conversation with him for an entire hour. > >Calin > >-J > >-- >Joe Larson jpl(at)showpg.mn.org 612-595-9690(w) >Showpage Software, Inc. >435 Ford Rd, Suite 315 >St. Louis Park, Mn 55426 Future RV-6A pilot. > >Text item: External Message Header > >The following mail header is for administrative use >and may be ignored unless there are problems. > >***IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS SAVE THESE HEADERS***. > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII >Mime-Version: 1.0 >X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] >Date: Fri, 11 Aug 1995 08:47:01 -0500 (CDT) >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Wing skins -or- I've GOT to meet this guy >Message-Id: <9508111347.AA01526@showpg.> >Reply-To: showpg!jpl(at)matronics.com (Joe Larson) >From: kksys!showpg!jpl(at)matronics.com (Joe Larson) >Received: by showpg. (5.x/SMI-SVR4) >Received: from showpg by kksys.skypoint.net with uucp >Received: from kksys.skypoint.net by netcomsv.netcom.com with SMTP (8.6.12/SMI-4 >.1) >Precedence: bulk >Errors-To: bounces(at)matronics.com >Received: from showpg.UUCP by matronics.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) >Received: from matronics.com by netcomsv.netcom.com with UUCP (8.6.12/SMI-4.1) >Errors-To: bounces(at)matronics.com >Received: from netcomsv.netcom.com (uucp7.netcom.com) by SSD.intel.com (4.1/SMI- >4.1) 95 0 >Received: from ichips.intel.com by relay.jf.intel.com with smtp > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1995
From: ammeterj(at)ammeterj.seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re: Avionics (chatter)
--=====================_808189496==_ Greg Rainwater of the Puget Sound RVators has written a short article on how he was able to mount his com antenna in the fiberglass wingtip of his RV-4. I have attached the article. >Thanks for all regarding the shipping advice, I think Frank summed it > up quite well. Empennage and wings this fall! > >Avioncis question: has anyone been able to successfully mount a nav and > com antenna within the fiberglass wing tips (or tail section). I did > see some pics of a tape antenna on a -6 canopy. I would imagine you > could put a GPS antenna right on the glare shield of a tip up canopy. > >Dan >RV-6 23101 > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1995
From: Bruce Oliver <75274.3426(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: Subscribe
I have started an RV 6A and will need a lot of help. Thanx: Bruce ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JamesCone(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 11, 1995
Subject: Re: micro monitor engine instrument system
The micro monitor that I was talking about is the Rocky Mountain Instruments one. It is much cheaper than the micro vision one and does everything just as well. The micro monitor is the only engine instruments that I use. It is bullet proof and needs no backup. I bought all of the sensors except the carb temp probe. There is no place to put one in an Ellison Throttle Body unless you start drilling holes in it, and it is not prone to much carb ice anyway. Jim Cone ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JamesCone(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 11, 1995
Subject: Re: US Tools dimplimg tools
Avery has great tools. They also gave so many prizes at Van's dinner at Oshkosh that it was embarrassing to the other suppliers who gave some too. Bob Avery told me that it was not his intention to embarrass anyone, but rather to give something back to the RV builders who mean so much to his business. Quite a guy. Avoid ATS tools. They are not good quality and the prices aren't the best either. Jim Cone ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1995
From: Jeffrey Hall <jhall(at)fortnet.org>
Subject: Re: Houses with shops
Now the scenario becomes obvious...hmmm, house neglected, two car garage in great shape, yep, divorce forces sale of property of aircraft builder!!! ("but my second wife loves flying!!!") On Fri, 11 Aug 1995, Michael Graves wrote: > Joe Larson Wrote: > > > > Deja vu. My wife and I spent last Sunday stopping in at open houses. > > Typical conversations included things like: > > > > "Hmm. Those windows look like they pop out." > > > > "3-car garage. Well, one of the cars will fit." > > > > "I don't think I could get the fuselage out that basement walkout door, > > but could build the wings down here." > > > > While she was looking at kitchens and bathrooms and such, I was checking > > out garages and walkout basements and difficulty in running 60-amp service > > to each of them.... > > > I envied some of you guys that have garages, so I was interested in the MLS > listing which described a "detached 2 car garage". Expecting the worst, I looked at it. Ironicly, the shop is in better condition than the house. Price was too > good to pass up. My advice to prospective home buyers: do a lot of research, > These older homes my require much upgrading before real work can begin. > > > Mike Graves > > RV-6A in box on closet shelf > offer made on shop (WITH HOUSE!) > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1995
From: Jeffrey Hall <jhall(at)fortnet.org>
Subject: Re: US Tools dimplimg tools
Stephen, if the thing was out of alignment when you bought it, there shouldn't be any problem returning it, if it was me, I'd get rid of it, spend the extra bucks on a good one, believe me, by the time you get far into building, you'll be replacing any cheap tools you buy, thus buying two tools instead of one. I have yet to meet a builder that hasn't said "I wish I had just spent the money the first time and bought a good one" Jeff RV4 2179 On Fri, 11 Aug 1995, Stephen M. Brown wrote: > > :-( > > No one has yet answered my question... and I don't know if this thing is any > good. > > Appreciate the plugs for Avery, I found them *after* ordering this from > Aircraft Spruce; I now feel the same as the other comments, spoke with Judy > once or twice. Also didn't know about this list when ordering the first set > of tools :-( :-( > > Would it be best to return this to Aircraft Spruce and purchase from Avery?? > that's what I'd really like to do. ~$189 vs $110. Anyone ever try to return > things to Aircraft Spruce?? > > -- > Steve Brown > System Engineer > Cisco Systems - Phoenix > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 1995
From: "David A. Barnhart" <barnhart(at)crl.com>
Subject: Re: primer
On Fri, 11 Aug 1995, Frank K Justice wrote: > You need to prime the outside for good adhesion of finish coats, but most > primers indicate that the finish coat should be put on soon after the primer > for or else you must roughen the primer. We will sometimes put primer on the > outside of pieces we expect to sit around for a long time as a way of > protecting them from corrosion and scratches. Also, some primers (I've noticed thia about Veriprime) readily absorb the oils in your skin from handling. If you prime the exterior surface, then handle it a lot, you are going to need to strip the primer off and re-prime before you paint. Best Regards, Dave Barnhart rv-6 sn 23744 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 1995
From: "David A. Barnhart" <barnhart(at)crl.com>
Subject: I pressure tested the fuel tank
Since I had posted some information here a couple of weeks ago about sealing the fuel tank with the help of Scott McDaniels of Aerizona Aerocrafters, I thought I would just follow up. I completed pressure-testing the tank last night and it has no leaks. Best Regards, Dave Barnhart rv-6 sn 23744 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 1995
From: "Gregg L. Sloan" <gsloan(at)CapAccess.org>
Subject: Re: US Tools dimplimg tools
On Fri, 11 Aug 1995, Stephen M. Brown wrote: > Would it be best to return this to Aircraft Spruce and purchase from Avery?? > that's what I'd really like to do. ~$189 vs $110. Anyone ever try to return > things to Aircraft Spruce?? If you're suspect of the quality try to return it. You will not be disappointed with the Avery tool. I once exchanged a defective Tatco squeezer with Aircraft Spruce. No problem, just needed to call and get return authorization. For those of you now wondering what was wrong with the Tatco squeezer: the brass bushing was not press fit properly and came loose. Gregg Sloan_____gsloan(at)capaccess.org_____Herndon, Virginia__USA RV-6A #22425 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JerryFlyRV(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 12, 1995
Subject: Re: primer
>Mike writes >Note for Randall Henderson and others > >At the Portland RV-ators builder group meeting at your house last night, I >noticed that your empennage was primed with a greenish-yellow primer inside >and out. Does the entire surface of the airplane need this treatment? Does >the >finish paint stick better with this primer? I'm familiar with painting steel, > >but not aluminum. Mike One needs to consider who is going to paint your airplane, I think it is wise to paint the interior, but before painting the exterior if you are not going to paint the airplane yourself, you should talk to the painter, alot of painters have a system worked out and do not like to take on a paint job where the primer has already been applied, I know my painter didn't like it because my wings were primed already. Jerry Springer ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JerryFlyRV(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 12, 1995
Subject: Re: alternators the easy way
<< rv-list(at)matronic.com > I hope Mark's Chevy generator is reliable enough to >last a while. I'd be interested to know how it works out. > > > Mike Graves Mike I can vouch for the Chevy Sprint alternator, I got mine at a wrecking yard for $45.00 had it tested for $2.00, it has now been on my plane for 700hrs without a problem. I have a volt meter and it consistantly puts out 14.2 volts and that is about where the gel cell type batteries like to be charged. My hanger mate has the same alternator on his RV-6 with about 375 hrs and no problems. The neat thing about them is they are light and small, very simple to wire because they have a built in regulator. Some of the Lancair people are using them also. Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS PS you live close enough by I would be glad to show it to you sometime >> ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rad(at)gulf.net
Date: Aug 12, 1995
Subject: Final "RV-Listers" List
Well, like it or not, here it is. There are 76 listings that include 23 states and 6 countries. I edited listings where necessary in an attempt to keep them in the same format. I also removed phone numbers and street addresses. I hope everyone is satisfied with the results. As they say, you get what you pay for :-) We are, indeed, and interesting group. Putting together the list was interesting, but I don't plan to keep it current. I've got too many things going on now. I'm actually toying with the idea of selling my project. John Hovan will also be putting this on his fine RV Web page: http://atlantis.austin.apple.com/people.pages/jhovan/home.html Enjoy, Russell Duffy ************************************************************ ************************************************************ ALABAMA: Frank Marlowe Trinity, AL fmarlowe(at)hiwaay.net RV-6A SN 22782(plans#) The project has been in limbo for the past year due to overwhelming business demands and govermental red tape. The tail is 75% complete and I hope to continue the project soon. I have wing kit (non drilled). Hope to install a 180 w/cs prop. Your mail group is very encouraging. I'm glad to be a part of it and hope I'll be able to contribute someday. Regards, Frank ************************************************** ARKANSAS: Richard Ernst Conway, AR ernstrm(at)alpha.hendrix.edu RV-6A SN-23205 Tail is 85% finished (elevators not quite complete). Wing kit should arrive late July. Planned options: manual elevator and aileron trim, manual flaps. Will be building my own wing spar. ************************************************** CALIFORNIA: Brian K. Cooper Altadena, CA cooper(at)robotics.jpl.nasa.gov RV-6A SN-23141 I'm finishing up the empennage and just ordered my wing kit. I'm planning on tip-up canopy, electric flaps and elevator and 0-360 with CS prop. I work at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (part of NASA). I'm part of the team that is building the first robotic vehicle (rover) to be sent to Mars, launching Dec of next year. ************************************************** Jess Mallian Bakersfield, CA RV4FLYER(at)aol.com RV-4, #3410 ************************************************** Edward Cole Cupertino, CA ecole(at)ix.netcom.com RV- (didn't say) Test Engineer at Maxim Integrated Products (Semiconductors) ************************************************** Remi D. Khu Long Beach, CA rkhu(at)earthlink.net RV-4 SN-3751 Project started on 25 March 1994 Location: Compton Municipal Airport (CPM) Empennage section assembled, primed. Tips not yet installed. Currently (7/95) hanging left wing ribs onto Phlogiston spars. Plan: IFR panel, loran, single comm cluster with handheld backup. Considering Wenkel auto-converted engine block. C/S prop - suggestions? Sliding canopy modification (if practical for rear pax) Dual-control linkage - Electric flaps only! Color: Silver longitudinal trimming on Black/Navy Blue ************************************************** Gil Alexander Los Angeles, CA (near Marina del Rey) gil(at)rassp.hac.com RV6A s/n 20701 Tail complete, wings 95%, fuselage out of jig and installing cockpit stuff. Tip-up canopy, electric flaps, elec. elev. trim. Have a 1800 hr. O-320E2G - needs a new sump for the -6A, will probably convert it to 160 HP. 47 years old, electronics engineer, glider pilot/owner and an Airframe Mechanic. ************************************************** Gary A. Sobek Manhattan Beach, CA Work: GASobek(at)ccgate.hac.com Home: 70176.1660(at)Compuserve.com RV-6 SN-20480 N-157GS Started April 1989. Tail 100%, wings 99% (built own spar, fuel tanks were easy, My employer provided OJT for Proseal!), Fuselage on Gear 98%, Manual flaps, manual 2 axis trim, sliding canopy 100%, Engine O-320 B2B C with Constant Speed 98%, instruments 95%, cowl 95%, FAB-320 5%, wiring 2%, plumbing 60%, Seats ordered with October delivery scheduled, First flight planned for December 1995. Planning on being at Oshkosh 1996 complete with paint. The -6 is based at CABLE airport in Upland, CA (Southern California.) Cost to build: 2 wives, 1 girl friend, 2 houses, 3 rental units, 1 house of furniture and 1 car. Time to build to date: 1700 hours + engine rebuild time not included. Attending night classes for A&P license, 80% complete. I am a Electrical System Engineer designing satellite test equipment interfaces. ************************************************** Chris Ruble Milpitas, CA cruble(at)cisco.com RV-6 S/N# 22151 Tail feathers completed, Wings in process Product Test Egn., Cisco Systems Currently flying a '65 Cherokee 180 (8085W) ************************************************** Jim Ayers Newbury Park, CA jeayers(at)ccgate.hac.com RV-3 SN 10050 Flying :-) RV-4 SN 2708 Building :-( RV-3 N47RV Completed 1988. First 323.7 hours on Lyc. O-290-G. 9 hours on LOM M332A (4 cyl in-line inverted Czechoslovakian aircraft engine). Wing tanks. Side-hinged canopy. Sportcraft NAV antenna in right wing tip, and Sportcraft COM antenna in vertical stabilizer cap (10" tall). RV-4 Started on tail kit. (Kits are a lot nicer than plans built.) ************************************************** Russ Nichols Sacramento, CA Russ_Nichols(at)fire.ca.gov RV-6 SN 24010 Empenage in progress. Tool collection growing... Software engineer/project manager, California Dept. of Forestry ************************************************** Bruce Patton San Luis Obispo, CA BPattonsoa(at)aol.com RV-6A Started 11/94, Wings/tail complete, Fues in Jig, EAA chapter 170, Age 50, Engineer, Glider Pilot Other Projects: HP-18 glider, completed in '87 ************************************************** COLORADO: Bob Hall Colorado Springs, CO RV6Bldr(at)aol.com RV-6 s/n 20719 tail - 98% wings- 75% fuselage - preparing my order electric elev. trim, electric flaps, sliding canopy USAF ret, dabbler in computer programming ************************************************** Dane Heule Denver, CO Compuserve address is 76364.2426 or bq535(at)freenet.hsc.colorado.edu RV-4 18LR I have been flying my RV-4 for 6 years here in Denver and I am active with the local Rockey Mountain RVators. ************************************************** Jeffrey Hall Ft. Collins, Co. jhall(at)fortnet.org RV4 sn2179 ************************************************** Ed Weber Ft Collins, CO ebw(at)fc.hp.com RV-6A SN-23945 Started empenage in June 95. ************************************************** Warren Gretz Littleton, CO (Metro Denver) gretzw(at)tcplink.nrel.gov RV-6 s/n 23270 N25WG Wings about 98% done. One year into project. ************************************************** FLORIDA: Nigel Kirlew Coconut Creek, FL anto(at)gate.net RV-6A SN-23221 I purchased a set of plans two years ago and have yet to begin construction. Current plan is to order empennage in a month. Wish list: O-360, sliding canopy, electric flaps to save space in cockpit, VFR panel. ************************************************** Russell Duffy Navarre, FL (near Pensacola) rad(at)gulf.net RV-6 sn-22407 Empenage complete, currently working on fuel tanks, building both wings at once. Basic VFR I'm a field service rep for Picker International. I install and maintain Medical Imaging systems (mostly MRI and CT scanners). ************************************************** IDAHO: John Winter Boise, ID WinterByte(at)aol.com RV-6A I began the project by tooling up about 1.5 years ago. Construction on tail started in May. Took 2.5 months of full time + to complete horz stab, vert stab, and rudder. This is probably longer than average, but I have never worked with sheet metal before this. Boy, have I learned a lot! Got some good info on trim from the network. Thanks to all who took time to comment. I've decided to go with servos. Planned completion date is the year 2000. Software Consultant specializing in CASE tools and data base design. ************************************************** ILLINOIS: Don Mack Chuck Mack (brothers) New Lenox, IL donmack(at)interacess.com RV-6A SN-22307 Emp. Complete Left wing - Needs bottom skin and flaps attached Using Phlsogen (sp) spar, London tanks, manual trim Plan to us 360 with CS prop. ************************************************** Thomas Boatright Urbana, IL trboatri(at)ux1.cso.uiuc.edu RV-4 empenage complete, wings 85% complete. I work at the University of Illinois mostly installing, maintaining and programming fire alarm and security systems. ************************************************** IOWA Jim Delveau Ankeny, IA JDelveau(at)aol.com RV-6 Started project in October of 1994 (got a very slow start) Left elevator just about finished and waiting on the wing kit. Computer Consultant for Goulden Computer Services, Inc. in Des Moines, IA. Married, no children, two beagles (planning to make special beagle area in the baggage area.) ************************************************** KANSAS: Greg Tyler Derby, KS gtyler(at)southwind.net RV-6 S/N 23685 I am Greg Tyler, from Derby, Kansas - near the "Air Capital of the World" (Wichita) and have plans to build a RV-6. (I have finally convinced my wife that this is really going to happen! :^) I am currently working on building a tool collection. I have a slight advantage since Boeing surplus sales is nearby. (new and some experienced Clecos for .25 ea!) I still havn't ordered my tail kit but hope to soon. ************************************************** Kevin Vap Olathe, KS (Kansas City metro) kvap@sky.net (http://www.sky.net/~kvap) RV-6 SN-24163 - just getting started (plans->tools->tail-kit any day) - planning electric flaps, O-360, tip-up - attending late September builders clinic @ Van's - software engineer working for GPS manufacturer (Garmin) ************************************************** MAINE: Mike Draper Bridgewater, MA michael.draper(at)stream.com RV6 Industry: Software, Systems Development. Myself: Married, two boys (7 & 9). Project was placed on hold past 3 years while my job had me on the road 70% time. Joined a new company in April, 0% travel, found this list and can't wait to dust off my project. Was able to get some acro training in the past few years, makes you really appreciate the RV... ************************************************** Gary Bataller Westboro, MA bataller(at)hki127.ed.ray.com RV6A, N615RV I am transporting my plane to the airport on August 12th, and will complete it there. I estimate about 2 more months of work. Married, 4 kids (8,13,15,17); software engineer (ATC systems) ************************************************** MARYLAND: Dave Hyde Chesapeake Beach, MD nauga(at)windvane.umd.edu RV-4 Empennage complete, Wings ~70% complete, Ordering fuse soon Bells and whistles: 2-axis electric trim (installed) planning electric flaps. I'm a flight test engineer for the Navy, working flying qualities/stability and control of attack airplanes. ************************************************** MINNESOTA: Joe Larson Golden Valley, Minnesota jpl(at)showpg.mn.org RV-6A Working on an RV-6A. Just finishing the HS this weekend. ************************************************** Jim Wittman Minneapolis MN Jim Wittman(at)73362.2004 (CompuServe) RV-6 S/N 24048 Tail @ 50%; Wings on order I have 51 yrs, though it doesn't seem like it except when I try to get out of bed. I'm married; one of our combined 7 kids is away and three more will be out in the next year. I run a truck maintenance business; but unfortunately that does NOT make me a mechanic. I flew helicopters for 10 yrs, Army and comm'l, and had a little exposure to our maintenance operations (still didn't learn enough to help me now). I'll get the best engine I can afford when I get that far. O-360 w/ C/S, Throttle-body fuel system and elec ignition preferred. I hope to equip for IFR so that my trips can be somewhat more reliable. ************************************************** Larry Groom Prior Lake, MN lgroom(at)millcomm.com KE0VZ ke0vz(at)wb0gdb.mn.usa RV6 #23782 Horizontal Stab complete. (Summer is here gotta golf!) Pilot for Northwest Airlines ************************************************** MISSOURI James Cone St. Charles, MO jamescone(at)aol.com RV-6A 22929 N929JC TAIL, WINGS, & FUSELAGE COMPLED. WORKING ON FINISHING KIT. FULL IFR PANEL, O-320E2D 160HP, MICRO MONITOR ENGINE INSTRUMENT SYSTEM, ELLISON THROTTLE BODY, SKY-TECH STARTER, PELICAN 65 AMP ALTERNATOR, SENSENICH FIXED PITCH PROP, SLIDER CANOPY, ELECTRIC FLAPS, ELECTRIC TRIM, MANUAL AILERON TRIM, SELF DESIGNED MANUAL RUDDER TRIM. HOPE TO BE FLYING NEXT YEAR. AIRLINE CAPTAIN FOR TWA. RETIRED LT. COL. USAF PILOT. AVIATION NEWSPAPER COLUMNIST. EDITOR OF VAN'S AIR FORCE, TRI-STATE WING NEWSLETTER. COMPLETED AND FLEW A SEA HAWKER COMPOSITE AMPHIBIAN THAT HAS SINCE BEEN SOLD. EAA FLIGHT ADVISOR FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE AIRCRAFT. VICE PRESIDENT OF EAA CHAPTER 32, ST. LOUIS, MO. *************************************************** NEW JERSEY: Gary Corde Asbury, NJ RV6junkie(at)aol.com RV-6 s/n 21194 N211GC My RV is based at Alexandria Field in NJ and is about 99.9% complete. The aircraft was started in October of 1990. Should be flying around the time Oshkosh starts. It has a slide-back canopy, electric trim. auto-pilot, IFR pannel, DJ Larsen interior, CD Player and a list of stuff that I can't even remember. It is powered by a 160hp Lycoming turning a Performance 3-bladed prop. I had the prop on a friends RV-4 and it was great....can't wait to fly it on my -6. My wife (Malia) and our two children (Kyle & Connor) live in Asbury, New Jersey. I am 32 years old and make my living as an aviation insurance broker in New York city. This was the first aircraft that I have built. I had a lot of support from local RV-ers. There are three other RV aircraft in my hangar. There are about 3 more RV-4 flying in the area with another 4 or 5 other RV's going together. ************************************************** Tom Goeddel Fair Haven, NJ t.goeddel(at)att.com RV-6a SN-22041 Empennage is complete, left wing is almost done, much of the little stuff (fluting, deburring, and priming ribs, making fittings, etc.) done for right wing. Planning on manual trim, electric flaps, and sliding canopy. Avionics will be basic VFR (radio, GPS). On the fence about gyros. No decision on engine, prop, etc. Building in a 1-car garage. Married, with 2 kids (8 year old twins) and an overweight cat who doesn't respect tools. Started project 4/92. Sloooow but steady progress. ************************************************** Mike Pilla Old Bridge, NJ mpilla(at)ccsmtplink.espinc.com RV4 s/n 2866 tail - done wings - done, lights installed and tested, strobes working, ... fuse - still in jig, installed flap control blocks last evening finish kit - in hand electric flaps, O-320-E2D being converted to -D1A involved with small startup in computer-telephony; struggling, so it cuts into building time, unfortunately. ************************************************** NORTH CAROLINA: Dick Steffens Mooresville, NC res6246(at)des.dukepower.com RV-6 Finishing wings (8/95), HIO-360-B1A, Electric Elevator Trim, Manual Aileron Trim, Sliding Canopy, etc. Occupation: Civil Engineer, Duke Engineering & Services, Charlotte, NC. Currently Own a Citabria. ************************************************** Donald J. Karl Raleigh, NC karl@dg-rtp.dg.com RV-6A SN-not_yet I want to start a 6A in early 1996. I'll go for 360ci (parallel valve) maybe injected, maybe carb. I'll start with VFR planning on expanding to IFR (only for occasional use). Might go to c/s prop right away?$$? Hinged canopy, electric flaps, trim unknown. I'm 32 years old. I'm an operating system kernel programmer; 10 years at IBM and now 1 year at Data General working on UNIX. Until three years ago, I knew nothing about planes, but since then I've read everything I can get my hands on. I still don't have plane building experience, but I probably have about 8000 hrs of experience doing construction and woodworking. I think the big attraction to planes for me is the materials will weigh much less and I won't have sawdust up my nose. I bet that aluminum is sharp though??? Fellow rv-lister Wayne Westerhold works one aisle away and is teaching me a lot. We both wanted an RV before we met. Small world. ************************************************** OREGON: Carl Weston Aloha, OR carl(at)drcpdx.stt3.com RV-6 23876 Finishing empennage kit (control surfaces), electric trim. Wing kit on order, electric aileron trim. Planning for 0360/CS, full gyros, tilt-up. Software Engineer (UNIX distributed computing). ************************************************** Jim Caufield Beaverton, OR caufield(at)sequent.com RV-4 SN-3453 I am a first-time builder with zero previous buiding experience. Graduate of the May '93 Vans Builders Clinic. If I finish this project, literally *anyone* can! Empenage completed, wing 50% completed (ready to start fuel tanks). I bought the factory spar and don't regret it. Project was stalled due to recent move, but I hope to pick up the pace in the next 6 months. The 'mission' of this aircraft will be day/night VFR with aerobatic capabilities. I want inverted fuel and oil, but don't think I can afford a constant-speed prop. No gyros. No fancy interior. A lean and mean ship. ************************************************** Frank Justice Beaverton, OR frank(at)ssd.intel.com RV-6A ________________________________________________________________________________ Compiling detailed instructions for RV6 build ************************************************** Steve Kimura Corvallis, OR kimuras(at)csos.orst.edu RV-6A S/N 24376 At preview plans stage. Computer programmer at Hewlett-Packard. Around 90 hours total, with three little kids. 33 years old, and have been an RV dreamer for the last 15. ************************************************** Ross Mickey Eugene, OR rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com RV-6A SN-23203 Empanage done, wings done, working on firewall, and other bulkheads. Standard except for electric flaps. Plan on IFR, autopilot. Undecided on engine/prop. Married with two children, 2&7. Association executive representing primary wood manufactures in public policy issues. ************************************************** Calin (Earl) Brabandt Hillsboro, OR ewbraban(at)ichips.intel.com RV-6 SN-21830 N66VR: RV-6 with slider, mech. flaps & trim. Empenage & wings completed, fuse out of jig. 0-360 w/ Hartzell C/S (from Van's). Building an IFR sport x/c machine. Planning for floats. ************************************************** Jim & Jackie Eastburn Hillsboro OR (two miles north of van's) JIMNJAC(at)aol.com RV-4 tail section under const. firefighter (I get to drive the fire engine) wife, paramedic ************************************************** Mike Graves Hillsboro, OR mgraves(at)ptdcs2.intel.com RV-6A After messing around for two years, I finally bought a plan set. That was one year ago, and I am saving up for the tools now. I am planning on a basic VFR panel and probably manual flaps/elevator trim. I have not decided on engine/prop combination yet. ************************************************** Jerry Springer Hillsboro, OR ( 6 mi from Van's) JerryFlyRV(at)aol.com RV-6 s/n 20241 N906GS Third customer built RV-6 to fly Tip-up, Elec flaps, Elec trim, Vac Gyros, Navaid autopilot, Rocky MTN. Encoder O-360 A4A,Warnke Prop First Flight July 14, 1989 ************************************************** Randall Henderson Portland, OR (Near Van's) randall(at)edt.com RV-6 SN-21946 Tail, wings- done, just started fuselage Editor, Portland RVators Newsletter PPSEL&S, Instr, Currently fly a 1965 Champion Citabria ************************************************** Don Wentz Scappoose OR (20 miles from Van's shop) Don_Wentz(at)ccm2.hf.intel.com RV6 s/n 20369 N790DW tip-up canopy electric flaps, elevator, aileron, rudder trims 180hp fixed Warnke prop First flight June 30, 1994, 196hrs as of today, July 22, 1995 Technical Marketing Engineer supporting PC Baseboard OEM customers, for Intel ************************************************** James Mike Wilson (go by Mike) St. Helens, OR (Portland area) James_Mike_Wilson(at)ccm2.hf.intel.com RV4, plans# 3369 tail, wing, all control surfaces- done, fuse in jig (skinning) started Feb. 93, Plan minimum configuration no bells or whistles, except electric flaps Want 180hp ************************************************** PENNSYLVANIA: Bill Garrett Pottstown, PA 19465 wgarrett(at)mciunix.mciu.k12.pa.us RV-6A SN#22641 Empennage 90% complete, wings 60%? complete, envision as 4-6 yr. project Canopy, engine, prop configurations undecided Currently planning IFR to be able to get through light "soup" only of the northeast US in summer ************************************************** SOUTH CAROLINA Ken Harrill Columbia, SC KHarrill(at)aol.com RV - 6 SN 23917 I started my RV - 6 project in early spring, 1995. The empennage should be completed by late summer. I plan to build my own wing spar (suggestions & advice will be appriciated). *************************************************** TENNESSEE: Shelby Smith Nashville, TN Shelby1138(at)aol.com RV6A #22666 Currently working on my wings, Fuel tanks finished but not tested Did the Barnard Option hope to order my fuselage by end of the year. Want to do 0-360 with constant speed but will decide next year or the year after. Intrigued with Zoche, MDB, and Suburu options, but waiting to see. Planning sliding canopy - currently trying to decide on lights - whether to put them in tips or wings - hearing rumblings from Steve Barnard Re: different wing tips so am leaning toward wing placement. Using an interesting jig for my wings that allows 360 degree rotation - Dave Hudgins makes them here in Nashville(advertised in RVator). ************************************************** TEXAS: David Bonorden Austin, TX Dave.Bonorden(at)amd.com RV-4 SN-2562 Emmpenage 98% done, wing kit waiting in the garage. Garage full of wife's junk. When the time comes, I will look seriously at any auto engine conversion that has several examples flying successfully. I have my own consulting business and I'm an electrical engineer at AMD in Austin, working on verification of the K5 processor. I'm a former Air Force avionics and missile flight test engineer. ************************************************** William Downey Austin, Texas billd(at)ibmoto.com RV-6A SN-22334 I work for IBM designing PowerPC microprocessors. I have a wife and a cute little girl getting close to two years old. I love building things and I love flying. Constructing an RV gives me a chance to combine these two. So far I am still stuck on the tail. Most of this is inertia rather than any difficultly with the plans or kit. I moved into a new house last October with a three car garage. I have most of my new home projects out of the way and hope to get back to building soon. ************************************************** Kent & Laurie Williams Austin, TX KWilli8027(at)aol.com RV-6A O-320E2D - finish painting after oshkosh. plumbing contractor - austin,tx 5yr's this month. apx 1900 hr's const time. oh btw. tilt up canopy, std flap mechanism(this seems to be an item here) lucky enough to have locals like tony bingelis to assist in construction (he owed me-i helped him with two of his), jim stugart on electrical (elec engineer), seth hancock on engine rebuild (machinist) and finally bob seibert and mark fredrick with painting a metallic teel green . one more thing. all you builders who have just begun need to spend less time here and more time on your project ! ************************************************** Ken Gray Bryan, TX klgray(at)bihs.net RV6 SN: 23069 Almost done with finish kit. Setting it up for IFR, 0320 E2D, Fixed pitch. Started October 1993 expect first flight December 95. N number applied for. ************************************************** Tom & Bonnie Lewis Dallas, TX TommyLewis(at)AOL.COM RV6A SN 22844 in our garage, have both wings in jigs, have runout O320E2D, flying a Cessna 182 and make it to most flyins in area and the major ones like Oshkosh, Sun and Fun. Home airport: Aero Country - TX05 ************************************************** Diane & Bob Seibert Georgetown, TX Bobseib(at)aol.com RV-6 N691RV S/N 20691 Completed October 92 455 Hours TTAF Engine 52 Hours SMOH O-320-E2D Sliding Canopy Took 2300 HRS to build EVERYTHING Quality Manager @ Motorola ************************************************** John Hovan Pflugerville, TX hovan(at)apple.com RV-(didn't say) Awaiting Tail Kit from Van's. ************************************************** VIRGINIA: Gregg Sloan Herndon, Virginia gsloan(at)capaccess.org RV-6A s/n 22425 Tail, control sufaces complete, wing 75%. Planning simple vfr airplane. Member EAA National Capital Chapter 186. *************************************************** Richard E. Bibb Reston, VA rbibb(at)fore.com; rbibb(at)aol.com RV-4 SN 1187 Finishing electrical wiring, plumbing brakes, misc cockpit, paint, the test fly - all as of July 1995. Been buiding since 1988 with major layoffs but the end is in sight. ************************************************** Alan Reichert Reston, VA reichera(at)clark.net RV-6 s/n 24179 Still in the "study the preview plans and get tools" stage. Communications systems analyst and theatre technician. ************************************************** WASHINGTON: John Ammeter Everett, WA ammeterj(at)ammeterj.seanet.com RV-6 I'm flying my RV-6, N16JA, out of Paine Field.It has about 215 hours on it and made it most of the way to Oshkosh in 1992. A broken prop can really ruin your day. ************************************************** Doug Medema Everett, WA dougm@physio-control.com RV-6A #21140 Working on wings, built my own spars, working on ribs. Purchased one-piece top skins from Van's. I have an O-320-E2D. Planning on sliding canopy, VFR panel. Hope to get in the air for about $20k! ************************************************** Dan Davis Seattle, WA rv6dan(at)aol.com RV-6 I am currently working on my wings on my rv6. ************************************************** Mike McGee & Jackie Stiles Vancouver, WA jmpcrftr(at)teleport.com RV-6 ..sn 23530 Mike McGee and Jackie Stiles are partners in crime on a (planned) RV-6. Currently we have only the plans in the box that I purchased after Sun & Fun '94. We didn't think the old apartment would have worked well so we bit the bullet and had a house built that will accomodate the project. As soon as we get all this dirt to turn green the jigs go up in the garage. ************************************************** WISCONSIN Doug Weiler Hudson, WI Doug.Weiler(at)swamp.mn.org RV-4 Started in 1/91, currently working on fuel tanks with wings about 50% finished (I work slow!). Plan on a 160 or 180 with c/s prop. VFR simple instrumentation. President of MN Wing of Van's AirForce. One of the larger builder's groups with over 200 members. B-727 second officer for Northwest Airlines. Currently own a 1959 Cessna 180 (which is for sale... need to finance RV-4 and will probably get a Citabria in the interim). The 180 won best contemporary custom at OSH last year. I've also restored a Cessna 140A and an Aeronca 7AC. ************************************************** AUSTRALIA: John Morrissey Canberra, Australia John.Morrissey(at)its.csiro.au RV-4 Tail group finished wings almost finished - Fuselage, next! Just relocated to new house, building my dream workshop! ( Helped build Australia's first RV6) I work fo the CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation) as a computer network engineer. ************************************************** CANADA: Terry Gannon Calgary, Alberta, Canada (CYYC and CYBW) Compuserve 74267,3003 or Internet 74267.3003(at)compuserve.com RV-6 S/N 24414 Status: Preview Plans, . Hopefully attending the Builder's Course in September, kit purchase at the same time. Spouse: Michelle (no children) Occupation: Team Leader, Information Services, Sceptre Resources Limited Flying Exp: I currently have my Private License, and about 80 hrs. Other: Building is something that I have dreamed about since I was about fifteen, which is getting on for 20 years now. My inspiration at that time was Peter Garrison's Melmoth (sp?), particularly after it flew the Atlantic (whatever happened to it?). Current interest inspired by the remarkable determination of Delmar Benjamin in building the GeeBee. His work is a testament to what is possible if you REALLY believe in something. ************************************************** Curt Reimer Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada creimer(at)mbnet.mb.ca RV-6 Empannage & 1 Wing complete (almost) Electrical Engineer, Manitoba Telephone System ************************************************** Gordon Lomoth Kitchener Ontario, Canada GH.LOMOTH(at)resonet.com Prospective RV6 builder 35 yrs old, married, I work for Bell Canada Integrated Computer Services. Maintaing wan, lan and voice mail. Learning lots from this list and watching Gord Baxter build another RV6. ************************************************** Mark Richardson Nepean, Ontario (suburb of Ottawa), Canada richards(at)sofkin.ca RV-6 s/n 20819 - tail about to be mostly redone, almost complete (previous builder wasn't all that skilled!) - planning sliding canopy, electric flaps, and electric trim on ailerons and elevator - I expect it to be a VFR (maayyybeee IFR), 160hp, Sensenich machine. - planning on O-320B or D - attending RV forum near Syracuse NY in Sept. - software engineer/project manager - Naval EW systems ************************************************** Ken Hitchmough Toronto, Ontario, Canada J.Ken_Hitchmough(at)mail.magic.ca RV6A s/n 21450 tail, wings, fuse, finishing kit - done engine installed - 360 with injection wiring and doing all the fiddly bits tip-up canopy, electric flaps, electric elev. trim AirBeetle landing gear, 3 piece instrument panel with side cheeks home designed electronic instruments (similar to VM 1000) Spent 6 months in Nigeria building AIrBeetles ************************************************** DENMARK: Luis Madsen Copenhagen, Denmark luism(at)ibm.net RV-6, OYLUI Finished:Empenage, wings and fuselage(almost) Options:as few as possible, I think a good a/c is a light a/c. Instruments will be Rocky Mountains Encoder and Monitor and a G-meter. Tilt-up, manual flaps and fixed pitch prop. This is my first try to build a aircraft sow a keep to plans. I fly Fokker 50 as a commuter captain, will soon fly Boing 737. In Denmark one RV4 is flying, 2 under construction, 5 RV 6 under construction. ************************************************** GERMANY: Barbara & Uwe Bartsch 25548 Kellinghusen, Germany Barbara.Bartsch(at)dkrz.d400.de RV-6 SN-XXXXX Just started with the horizontal stabilizer, nothing special yet. Our Professions: Physicist, Pilot at the army ************************************************** NEW ZEALAND: Stephen (Steve) Bell Christchurch, New Zealand. Steve(at)discus.lincoln.ac.nz RV-6 SN-23747 As of July 95, empennage 95% complete, wing kit in shipping. will probably end up behind an O320 & fixed pitch wood prop. Computer consultant & soaring addict, flying a Nimbus II. ************************************************** ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 1995
From: "John P. Foy" <102370.3241(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: shop
The following shops are based on my experience of finishing five different homebuilts. The order of preference starts with #1. 1. 60' wide by 50' long with doors on both ends. Heated and airconditioned hangar on a public airport owned by a small town that appreciates aviation. Currently I am helping construct an RV-4 in this hangar without airconditioning or heat. I have a 50' bifold door on the front and two 15' sliding doors on the back. We are working in 95+ degree heat and with the doors partially open we get a wind tunnel effect that makes it better than bearable. No heat in the winter but we are able to get lots of work done in the winter after 10 a.m. 2. 40' wide by 20' depth with a 10' ceiling and a 9' double car door. Heated and airconditioned. Electrical outlets at 8' intervals above bench height. At least two 220v outlets at the same height. I use a 5hp 30 gal roll around compressor on the 220v circuit that seems to work the best. The portable compressor saves a lot of plumbing. Overhead flouescent units 8' long provide lots of light. However, a portable light on a stand is used a lot. Hope this provokes some ideas! John ________________________________________________________________________________ from odb.rhein-main.de (193.141.47.4) with smtp
Date: Aug 13, 1995
Subject: hello
From: rick(at)ndsbbs.rhein-main.de (Rick Lundquist)
hello to any rv builders. I am learning to use the net, and saw the address in the rvator. I am in the army, stationed in germany. I am building the empenage for an rv-4. so, i thought i would explore this economical means of communicating. rick National Data Service =| 49-6783-1785 |= | FIDOnet @2:2455/304.0 | Baumholder, Germany | -[Home of EuroList]- American BBSs in Europe | (at)ndsbbs.rhein-main.de | For Info: bbslist(at)ndsbbs.rhein-main.de | ________________________________________________________________________________
From: PKRV8r(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 13, 1995
crl.com!barnhart(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: US Tools dimplimg tools
This is an excellent place to discuss vendor quality. I too have returned several poor quality riveting and dimpling tools to U.S. Tool. Avery has good service and great quality! Pete Krotje ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Marc.Degirolamo(at)f15.n140.z1.fidonet.org (Marc Degirolamo)
Date: Aug 12, 1995
Subject: wing skinning
I am putting on the wing skins and am debating whether to put the bottom skins on first or vice-versa, top skins first. I know that it would be much easier to backrivet the top skins on, and they would probably look better, but I don't want any pop rivets in the bottom skins....Have any of you put the top skins on first..if so how did they turn out..could you get in to buck the rivets on the rear spar ( bottom skins).? While I'm on the topic of skins.. have any of you "heated" the skins while riveting them on..would you recommend doing this and if so what procedure did you use. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 1995
From: Jeremy <jbenedic(at)uofport.edu>
Subject: [C] Oshkosh / rv-list @ OSH
Sorry Jim, it's not technical, but at least you will get praise. Oshkosh Report - Van's Booth Viewpoint / RV-list activity at Oshkosh ******************************************************************** Well, another Osh has come and gone. For those of you who didn't make it this year, the following is a brief summary of what '95 was like - a view from Van's booth. Once again, the airport began filling up several days before the show even began. However, more airport parking was present, and the whole north side of 9/27 was open to aircraft camping. The attendance was up from Thursday to Saturday, but began dropping to below last-year levels thereafter. However, the reason was probably because of Mother Nature. The opening afternoon of the show brought severe thunderstorms, and rain, lots of rain. The night of rain certainly made me feel for those thousands of campers, but their Osh enthusiasm dried them out quickly. After that night, the weather turned clear and hot. For someone from the NW, it was miserable. By Sunday, the temps were 95 and climbing, with air so humid one had to swim around. By Sunday afternoon, many had given up and headed home. By Wednesday though, it had cooled down, and as a going away present, gave us low ceilings and poor visibility. Despite the weather and less people, there were LOTS of airplanes. More than any other year before. We saw only slightly more RV's though. Although 150 RVs out of 700 customs isn't bad at all. The booth saw many people, our planes out front were big attractants. The RV-8 was difficult to see at times; people were 5 or 6 layers deep. Things went well for us, no major problems. We had one foreign head of state visit our display, not bad. Overall, it was a pretty good year. Although I didn't get a chance to talk to Mark about how he wanted the list to be "advertised", we did try to inform as many as we could about the group. The meeting Saturday afternoon was advertised, we saw several -listers around. At 2:30, Jim Cone began talking outside the booth about the list. Soon more than 25 people were gathered around, pencil and paper in hand. After that, I had some handouts printed up about RV resources on the net, there was interest. Finally, during the Sunday Banquet, I made a short announcement about the list and web pages. About half of the 330 in attendance had e-mail access according to vote. Hopefully we will see more contributors to the list soon. Those of you interested in the RV-8, stay tuned, I will try to get the information piped here first hand, as soon as it comes out. (That is if no one objects). Jeremy jbenedic(at)uofport.edu ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JIMNJAC(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 14, 1995
Subject: rv-8
sooooo just out curiosity, when would anyone guess that the rv-8 be out of the testing phase and ready for market? just wondering... jimnjac hillsboro or. rv-4 emp. construction p.s. how do i access the rv www page from aol? thanks.. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: karl@dg-rtp.dg.com (Donald Karl)
Subject: Aircraft Spruce
Date: Aug 14, 1995
In reference to returns at Aircraft Spruce: I placed an order by Visa. I was billed, but they lost the invoice and never even sent my order (headset). They admitted the mistake freely (I had proof anyway). Next they sent the wrong headset. I was in a hurry as this process had taken months up to this point and I really needed this headset, so I asked if I could purchase the correct set while I simultaneously return the incorrect headset for a refund (all this as opposed to a regular exchange). I promptly got the new set, returned the old, and I still haven't gotten reimbursed for the old set. This whole process has taken 4 months. The sales people were nice, the customer service people were not reliable. I received numerous statements saying how sorry they were and it'll get taken care of right away, but it never did. The many long distance phone calls have made this far from a bargain. I'll try not to order from them again. I suspect the breakdown of their system in my order has to do with the organization style where one person does not take ownership a customer issue. I've delt with so many people its a joke. It's sad, cuz most of the people were nice people. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Don Karl karl@dg-rtp.dg.com (919)248-5915 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dierks(at)austin.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Aircraft Spruce
Date: Aug 14, 1995
After similar order problems, they are the last place I order from. I really like Wicks and Alexander. I have been burned many times by Spruce over items that they should have in stock and then backorder as they don't have them. Here is one for you, I did order some parts from ACS in Dec. There was one thing that they had and no one else had so I ordered from them. I needed some other AN nuts and bolts so just ordered it at the same time. Well, the order taker was this man. He said he was kind of new on the job. He looked up each item on the computer and then he wrote out the order on paper. He said he did not know how to enter an order on the computer. He made comments like "I hope they can read my writting". Sure enough, the sent one of the bolts as the wrong length. A friend of mine ordered some dope and fabric from ACS also and he got this same person a few months later and he was still writting out the orders. Herman Dierks, Dept. E54S, AWSD Austin, Texas mail: dierks(at)austin.ibm.com VM: DIERKS at AUSVM6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Graves <mgraves(at)ptdcs2.intel.com>
Subject: rv-8
Date: Aug 14, 1995
> > sooooo just out curiosity, when would anyone guess that the rv-8 be out of > the testing phase and ready for market? just wondering... > > jimnjac hillsboro or. rv-4 emp. construction > At a local builders group meeting here in RV country (PDX) Ken Scott of Van's said a few words about the "-8". He said not to expect a kit for at least 2 years, an the -8 of today is not necessarily the same as the kit of tomorrow. He also cautioned against throwing out the 4 on speculation the the -8 is just around the corner. The -8 is NOT just aound the corner. The -8 has been described as a -4 on steroids. It is said that Van arrived home from OSH about 2 hours before everyone else. Mike Graves RV-6A in box on closet shelf offer pending on house (WITH SHOP!) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1995
From: donmack(at)interaccess.com (Don Mack)
Subject: Re: wing skinning
We back riveted the top skin on. With two people, we should be able to get the entire bottom skin on without pop rivets. we left out the inboard first 4 ribs as per suggestions. don mack 6a > >I am putting on the wing skins and am debating whether to put the bottom skins >on first or vice-versa, top skins first. I know that it would be much easier to >backrivet the top skins on, and they would probably look better, but I don't >want any pop rivets in the bottom skins....Have any of you put the top skins on >first..if so how did they turn out..could you get in to buck the rivets on the >rear spar ( bottom skins).? > While I'm on the topic of skins.. have any of you "heated" the skins >while riveting them on..would you recommend doing this and if so what procedure >did you use. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Graves <mgraves(at)ptdcs2.intel.com>
Subject: Re: rv-8
Date: Aug 14, 1995
> > At a local builders group meeting here in RV country (PDX)... > > ...so why wasn't this guy there? Isn't Hillsboro RV country, too? |-) > > Nice summation, Mike. The only part you left out was the 350 pounders > "trying to pass for 250". > > > > > Sorry Jim, I said PDX for the benefit of the national guys. I consider Hillsboro and Twin Oaks to be my aviation home. :-) Mike Graves Trying to buy house to get RV-6A out of box ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Scott Hathcock <scotth(at)hpltbz.fc.hp.com>
Subject: Tail kit questions
Date: Aug 14, 1995
Hi, I am Scott Hathcock and have just started my tail kit. I have a couple of simple questions. 1) Can I cut out the lightening holes on the bottom rudder rib? The plans don't call this out but the rings are there. 2) Is there a correct direction for the rivets which hold the doublers to the spar channel? Manufactuerd head on the doubler or on the channel? Again I don't see this on the plans. Thanks for the help and I've enjoyed the information exchange. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Aircraft Spruce
Date: Aug 14, 1995
From: "Kevin E. Vap" <kvap(at)solar.sky.net>
-- [ From: Kevin E. Vap * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] -- I'll echo similar problems with them, and I haven't even ordered real aircraft parts yet. These problems were just in getting the catalog and some general pilot supplies. I too will stay away from Aircraft Spruce unless absolutely necessary. -Kevin Vap kvap@sky.net http://www.sky.net/~kvap ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1995
From: Richard Chandler <mauser(at)Claris.COM>
Subject: Replacements
So, if the eventual replacement for the RV-4 is the RV-8. Is the RV-6 going to be supplanted by the RV-10, or RV-12? And what is the RV-7? :-) -- "Wait a minute, you expect us innocent children to climb up dangerous scaffolding and paint naked people all over a church? We'll do it!!" -- Yakko Warner, Animaniacs "Yeah, I've got ADD, you wanna make something of.... oooh, cool. Look!" ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1995
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: Re: Aircraft Spruce
I've ordered several things from Aircraft Spruce, and never had a problem. I did get the fancy heated pitot-tube for $129 from them and later found out it was 20 bucks cheaper from Wicks. That was my fault for not shopping around though. Randall Henderson RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Graves <mgraves(at)ptdcs2.intel.com>
Subject: Replacements
Date: Aug 14, 1995
Richard Chandler Writes: > > So, if the eventual replacement for the RV-4 is the RV-8. Is the RV-6 going > to be supplanted by the RV-10, or RV-12? And what is the RV-7? > :-) > Van is not the type to make model changes, but instead makes a steady stream of improvements (remember the VW Bug?). The basic RV design dates back to the early seventies. Van's said that there is no plans for a -7, -10, or -12. I doubt that Van would discontinue the RV-4 because it is so popular. Even the old RV-3 is kept around for old times sake. In my opinion (for what it's worth),the RV is still the best kitplane bang for the buck. :-) Mike Graves ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1995
From: gil(at)rassp.hac.com (Gil Alexander)
Subject: Spraying nasty stuff - question
RV-listers, John Hovan recently warned me about spraying Imron, and we have all heard the warnings about this paint, and other polyurethane paints containing isocynates ... thanks for the thought, John. I want to start some Imron painting inside my RV6A soon, and need some protection since I don't really want to kill myself :^) I have seen supplied-air hoods advertised for about $70, which seems reasonable, but that still leaves the question of an exterior (to the painting area) pressurized air supply. Hobby-Air(?) sells a unit for about $330, but I remember that I saw something in an old Kitplanes magazine about a guy using a brown paper bag (with clear panel taped in!), a garden hose, and Shop Vac as a air supply. While all of this seemed so crude (cheap?) at the time, I didn't even bother keep the article. Since then, I've seen the above hood advertized, and wonder on the practicality of buying a Shop Vac just for the purpose of an air supply. I think cheaper Vac units can be bought for $50-60. Flex hose should be easy to come by (Van's conduit?), add a painters Tyvek suit, and the total cost should be quite reasonable for good personal protection. My questions are: Do you know anyone doing anything similar? Has anyone got a copy of the Kitplanes article I saw?? Any other comments or thoughts?? ... thanks ... Gil Alexander, RV6A, #20701 ... working on upper aft fuse. frame and skins ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rad(at)gulf.net
Date: Aug 14, 1995
Subject: RV-LISTERS Correction (non-tech)
Sorry to bug everyone with this, but I seem to have made a fairly serious mistake on the list. Thanks to David Rodenhiser who correctly pointed out that MA stands for Massachusetts not Maine. [Maine was easier to spell :-) ] My appologies to the 2 guys that I incorrectly put under Maine. I sent a corrected list to John Hovan that also has a few late entries added. Look for that on his RV Web Page. Russell Duffy (Geographically Challenged) PS- Note the comments on one of the late entries: Jim Stugart Round Rock (Austin), TX DerFlieger(at)AOL.com RV-6 One of the first finished in 1990. 180/cs prop, Tip up, Steerable tailwheel, Navaid AP, 300 Hrs. Presently converting to an RV-6A, Elec. flaps/elev. trim, Van's air filter, removing center console, adding lower panel, and fixing various other problems. OK Jim, tell us more. Why are you converting to a 6A? Many people are trying to decide between the 6 and 6A. I'm sure any first hand experience would be welcome. Thanks (sorry to put you on the spot) RD ________________________________________________________________________________
From: support (Matronics Technical Support 1+ 510-447-9886)
Date: Aug 14, 1995
Subject: RV-LIST Flames...
-------------- > > Matt, > I opened my mailbox this morning to find World War III underway. > I found the remarks and open hostility displayed by Mr. Remi Khu to be > offensive and out of line. I enjoy the camraderie that we have here on the > list and I am disturbed by his flames against Jerry Springer. > > -------------- Mr. Khu, The message above is typical of a number of complaints that I have received regarding your conduct on the rv-list. Please try to control yourself and your postings to the list. We on the rv-list consider everyone here family, and personal attacts are quite unnecessary. Thank you, Matt Dralle RV-LIST Administrator. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JamesCone(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 14, 1995
Subject: Re: micro monitor engine instrument system
I paid about $1300. for the micro monitor and all of the sensors except the carb temp probe. All indications are very accurate and stable, eg. the RPM is in tens of revolutions even though the system accurately measures the RPM to one RPM. This keeps the display from constantly changing unnecessarily. The cost of the Vision system is much higher. The airspeed/altitude encoder is a good value if you don't have and encoder for your transponder already. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dralle (Matt G. Dralle 1+ 510-447-9886)
Date: Aug 14, 1995
crl.com!barnhart(at)matronics.com, smbrown(at)cisco.com
Subject: Re: Re[2]: US Tools dimplimg tools
>-------------- >Back in the OLDEN days when I was building an RV4 I got many of my >tools from US. They were marginal at best. Avery was just getting >started supplying tools and a small selection. Since I've begun working >on the RV3 prototype re-build I have accumulated (bought/borrowed) tools >that come from Avery. They are far superior of anything I have from US. >I recommend Avery very strongly. They are still small enough to care. >-------------- Now, maybe I havn't ordered a tool from US in quite a while - I started back in 1988, but I ordered my first batch of tools from ATS. What a pile of crap. I was so disappointed. I then placed an order with US for a number of things and they were all very good - at least compared to ATS, I guess. I've never been disappointed with tools I've ordered from US. What's the deal?? Matt ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dralle (Matt G. Dralle 1+ 510-447-9886)
Date: Aug 14, 1995
Subject: Re: Wing skins -or- I've GOT to meet this guy
>-------------- >> Van's answer was: >> >> "The single skin is heavier; you don't get performance by >> being lazy." > >Why do I think an hour's conversation with Van would be very >informative and interesting? > >Joe Larson >-------------- Hum, it would seem to me that an hour of heeded tips like that might just build a pretty awsome airplane - hey wait a minute - the RV is an awsome airplane. See, I told you! Matt


July 25, 1995 - August 14, 1995

RV-Archive.digest.vol-ao