RV-Archive.digest.vol-bp

June 27, 1996 - July 11, 1996



      815-758-4573 after 6pm central daylight time.
      
      Apollo 360 integrated 3 inch moving map GPS
      EBC102A ELT - the neat little yellow lightweight, easy to install,   
      handheld one
      Cessna engine instrument cluster - very nice in an RV panel
      Carburetor - Marvel Schebler
      RT328T 720 channel nav com w/ indicator
      RT328C 360 channel nav com w/ indicator
      R546E ADF
      Narco AT50A transponder w/ altitude encoder
      Narco 824 Digital Nav
      Cessna Audio Panel
      VSI, Turn & Bank, vacuum pump, alternator
      
      All will include trays, existing harnesses, etc.
      
      Mitch Robbins
      robbinm(at)chi.ntsb.gov
      RV4 N13MR Flying  
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: OrndorffG(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 27, 1996
Subject: Re: restrictor fittings
You can file the rivet down to fit , or us a 1099 type rivet (1/8 shank with 3/32 head) and it will work fine, at least it did on both of my planes.Keep in touch ...george orndorff ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 26, 1996
From: Rick Osgood <Rick(at)ccc.henn.tec.mn.us>
Subject: Re: Good Deals on Parts
Robbins Mitch wrote: > > I just bought a well equipped, wind damaged, late model Cessna 172 to > cannibalize the engine. I have an amazing number of extra parts, many of > which I wish I had when I was building my RV-4, but can't use on my > latest project. I'll list a few of the items, but I have most of the > panel, airframe, interior, etc for sale. I'm just trying to recoup part > of my investment (so I can buy more parts) and will beat any of the > trade-a-plane dealer prices. This is my first announcement and I might > run an add in trade-a-plane soon. If anyone is looking for a good deal > on any parts that one might find on a C-172, let me know off list or call > 815-758-4573 after 6pm central daylight time. > > Apollo 360 integrated 3 inch moving map GPS > EBC102A ELT - the neat little yellow lightweight, easy to install, > handheld one > Cessna engine instrument cluster - very nice in an RV panel > Carburetor - Marvel Schebler > RT328T 720 channel nav com w/ indicator > RT328C 360 channel nav com w/ indicator > R546E ADF > Narco AT50A transponder w/ altitude encoder > Narco 824 Digital Nav > Cessna Audio Panel > VSI, Turn & Bank, vacuum pump, alternator > > All will include trays, existing harnesses, etc. > > Mitch Robbins > robbinm(at)chi.ntsb.gov > RV4 N13MR FlyingHi Mitch... How about a price on the ELT, 720 nav/comm, vsi turn/bank and vacum Thanks Rick Osgood Always looking for a deal ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 1996
From: Chris Ruble <cruble(at)cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Safety Belt, was Mustang II
This is required for compatition. Chris > > I took a couple of hours in a Pitts S2 a few years ago out at Santa Paula. In > addition to the five point harness, there was a light automotive type belt for > safety backup. Not a bad idea, I think. > > Steve Johnson > spjohnson(at)mmm.com > RV-8, #80121, empennage on the way > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 1996
From: n21pe(at)ix.netcom.com (Peter B. Mortensen)
Subject: Re: Good Deals on Parts
You wrote: > > > >I just bought a well equipped, wind damaged, late model Cessna 172 to >cannibalize the engine. I have an amazing number of extra parts, many of >which I wish I had when I was building my RV-4, but can't use on my >latest project. I'll list a few of the items, but I have most of the >panel, airframe, interior, etc for sale. I'm just trying to recoup part >of my investment (so I can buy more parts) and will beat any of the >trade-a-plane dealer prices. This is my first announcement and I might >run an add in trade-a-plane soon. If anyone is looking for a good deal >on any parts that one might find on a C-172, let me know off list or call >815-758-4573 after 6pm central daylight time. > >Apollo 360 integrated 3 inch moving map GPS >EBC102A ELT - the neat little yellow lightweight, easy to install, >handheld one >Cessna engine instrument cluster - very nice in an RV panel >Carburetor - Marvel Schebler >RT328T 720 channel nav com w/ indicator >RT328C 360 channel nav com w/ indicator >R546E ADF >Narco AT50A transponder w/ altitude encoder >Narco 824 Digital Nav >Cessna Audio Panel >VSI, Turn & Bank, vacuum pump, alternator > >All will include trays, existing harnesses, etc. > >Mitch Robbins >robbinm(at)chi.ntsb.gov >RV4 N13MR Flying > Mitch, I am building an RV-4 and I am just starting on the instrument panel. I am interested in the xponder & alt encoder, the engine instrument cluster, the ELT, and possibly the T & B. Please send me the prices to n21pe(at)ix.netcom.com Also, please describe the engine instruments in detail. Since I am building a -4, I have very limited space. Also, tell me specifically what instruments there are and their size, cost and shape. Thanks, Peter B. Mortensen. ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 1996
From: rdunn(at)ionet.net (Ronald M. Dunn)
Subject: Re: HS REAR SPAR
>I recently finished riveting the rear spar assembly of my RV-8. Now >if find that it has bowed, in the direction of the spar flanges >(toward the rear of the aircraft). Bow is about 1/2" on one end and >1-1/4" on the other. > >Is this something I should be worried about, or will all of that >structure and all of those rivets hold it in alignment? > >Also, any idea how this happens? Differential thermal expansion >between steel reinforcements and AL2 spar channel? (My workshop has >gotten very hot recently with the onset of the Texas summer. > > > >Thanks > >George Kilishek > Hi George, When I first assembled my rear spar, I discovered that the spar webs did not butt smoothly at the center. So I filed about .030 off the center of each web so that when clecoed together I could see light (a space) between the two halves. There's going to be a 1/4 to 3/8 gap in your front spar pieces also. Good luck, Ron Ron Dunn (RV-8 #80078) rdunn(at)ionet.net Broken Arrow, OK ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 1996
From: "Marian K. Rendall or Scott Sawby" <mkr(at)netw.com>
Subject: Illinois RV's
I have to take a week off and help my mother with some house projects. She lives in Plainfield, IL. I would love to visit somebody's project if there is any lister in that vicinty. I'll probably be too busy to travel very far from there. I leave Saturday the 29th. Scott Sawby RV 6A (fusilage finally off the jig) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 1996
From: Charles England <england(at)vicksburg.com>
Subject: Re: Mustang II??
aol.com!WStucklen(at)matronics.com wrote: > > > >Saw a Mustang II last weekend - thought it was an RV at first. Any > >wisdom out there as to a comparison between the two?? > > > >Dave Musgrave > > Higher (much higher) landing speeds..... And it's tapered wing does real > nice snap rols when you try and slow it down too much......... > > Fred Stucklen RV-6A N925RV > wstucklen(at)aol.comThe Mustang II newsletter documented a reason for higher than published stall speeds than Mr. Bushby claims. The airfoil has a relatively sharp leading edge, & when (most) builders attempt to make their own wing leading edge, they tend to 'crease' it & end up with a near-knife-edge, and a very high speed, agressive, often uneven stall. A friend built one using the now-available preformed leading edge and with a 200 pound overweight airframe (200hp,cs prop,Retractable Trigear!) he's claiming a stall under 60 mph. It's still not an RV (narrow cockpit, etc.) but if built right they are nice a/c and a typical example is USUALLY faster than a typical RV-6. I'd rather have a -6 but wouldn't reject the M-II without some further research. Charlie England RV-4 N4375J england(at)vicksburg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 1996
From: Louis Willig <larywil(at)Op.Net>
Subject: Re: Safety Belt, was Mustang II
> >>As I recall from an old RVator article on Don's death by Van, he was >>flying with a passenger when a seat belt/harness let go (failed >>stitching) under some negative G - passenger hit the canopy. The canopy >>separated, and then hit the tail and took off the horizontal stab. > >>Lesson to learn? How do you quality check a new seat belt/harness? > >>Mike Kukulski (kukulski(at)indirect.com) >>RV-4 N96MK, rigging second aileron > >I took a couple of hours in a Pitts S2 a few years ago out at Santa Paula. In >addition to the five point harness, there was a light automotive type belt for >safety backup. Not a bad idea, I think. > >Steve Johnson >spjohnson(at)mmm.com >RV-8, #80121, empennage on the way > > The second lap belt, the automotive belt, is lovingly referred to as a "Jesus Christ" belt, because,if the first one gives way, the usual exclaimation is "Jesus Christ". And, lo and behold, we are saved (by the back-up belt). --Lou ________________________________________________________________________________
From: J.Ken_Hitchmough(at)magic.ca (J.Ken Hitchmough)
Date: Jun 27, 1996
Subject: Air Box for Fuel Injection
For those who were curious about my air box flapper valve (Fred). My fuel injected air box is the same as on a carb, just slightly in a different fwd/aft position. I'm not dead sure it will work but its simply about a 2inch by 3inch aluminum plate on a hinge right in the centre of the airbox (surrounded by filter). It is spring loaded to the closed position with the hope that if my filter ever completely iced, the vacuum would suck it open and it would get air from inside the cowl, bypassing the filter completely Ken Still waiting for final paperwork ;-( ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 1996
From: Pat McClung <pmc123(at)airmail.net>
Subject: GotChas!! to look for
I had a couple of things get my attention while flying off the first few hours on my RV6 (Have 5 to go). First, I had an old, used Bendix ignition switch without keys that had been around for years--Had keys made, tested it with a meter, and everything seemed to work(bad mistake). After about 18 hours and maybe 10 starts, the "start" position stuck and thrashed the light weight starter. I was lucky to get shut down in time to save the starter ring. Old starter switches can be deceiving and there is not way to really test them for sure. That was my first "gotcha"! While in the process of replacing the ignition switch and starter, the aircraft was down about two or three days--Hot summer, lots of bugs, etc. Something got in the right gas tank vent, apparently. When flown next, the right tank began to develop dents. A change of tanks and prompt landing was in time to open the tank lid(not easy with a lot of vacumm pressure, but the tank popped back in shape. Lots of time blowing out both vents, etc. and, more importantly, fabricating screen covers for the fuel vents to deter the bugs!!---- Just thought I would pass these things along from one who has been there, done that. Keep building--see you at Oshkosh and at Van's Homecoming. N3XM - flying ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 1996
From: ammeterj(at)seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re: GotChas!! to look for
. Something got in the right gas tank vent, apparently. >When flown next, the right tank began to develop dents. A change of >tanks and prompt landing was in time to open the tank lid(not easy with >a lot of vacumm pressure, but the tank popped back in shape. Lots of >time blowing out both vents, etc. and, more importantly, fabricating >screen covers for the fuel vents to deter the bugs!!---- > > I came across a unique screen cover for the 3/16" AL fuel vent lines. I found a metal screen that has a tube extending about 3/16" long from the screen. The tube has an OD just the right size to force fit inside the 3/16" AL line. It's hard to describe but what you end up with is a fuel line with a screen across the opening. Very unobtrusive and very effective. I have a few of these left and, if anyone is interested, I could send you two of them. To cover shipping you should send a check (or cash) for $1.00. I have enough for 15 to 20 more RV's but you might ask if I still have any before sending money. I could get more but I might have to buy at least 1000 at a time if I do. Somehow I hesitate to do that. John Ammeter ammeterj(at)seanet.com 3233 NE 95th St Seattle WA, 98115 USA RV-6 N16JA Flying 5 years ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 1996
From: ammeterj(at)seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: To Purchasers of Arlington Airfair Tickets
I was unable to get the tickets as planned last Friday. I picked them up after work today and they will be mailed tomorrow on my way to work. Please let me know if you have not received them by Tuesday, July 2. Sorry to bother the List but this is the quickest way to notify the people buying these tickets. John Ammeter ammeterj(at)seanet.com 3233 NE 95th St Seattle WA, 98115 USA RV-6 N16JA Flying 5 years ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 1996
From: bcon(at)ix.netcom.com (Robert M. Cornacchia )
Subject: Re: Illinois RV's
You wrote: > >I have to take a week off and help my mother with some house projects. She >lives in Plainfield, IL. I would love to visit somebody's project if there >is any lister in that vicinty. I'll probably be too busy to travel very far >from there. > >I leave Saturday the 29th. > >Scott Sawby RV 6A (fusilage finally off the jig) > > Hi Scott, Every Friday between 11:00am and 12:30pm about 20 to 25 RV builders meet for lunch at Clow airport (1C5) just outside of Plainfield IL. look them up and meet them for lunch. See ya, Bob Cornacchia RV6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 1996
From: "Mike Nellis [SFZ]" <76430.2670(at)CompuServe.COM>
Subject: Illinois RV's
>I have to take a week off and help my mother with some house projects. She >lives in Plainfield, IL. I would love to visit somebody's project if there >is any lister in that vicinty. I'll probably be too busy to travel very far >from there. >I leave Saturday the 29th. >Scott Sawby RV 6A (fusilage finally off the jig) Scott, there is an RV-Group that meets at Clow Airport (about 5 miles from Plainfield) every Friday for lunch and there are usually several RV's that show up. People start showing up around 11:30 am, have lunch and talk informally. There are typically 15 people or so that show up and many of those are current builders. I'm new to the group myself so I don't have any names or phone numbers to pass along but they are a friendly group (aren't all builders?) and are willing to talk. MIke Nellis 76430.2670(at)compuserve.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 1996
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: Re: Riveting Advice Needed
Looks like you're getting mostly blank stares from this one. I'm not surprised. The only place I remember ever seeing anything that indicates you would NOT want to just dimple all 3 pieces is my Standard Aviation Maintenance Handbook, which indicates that any combined underlying thicknesses can be treated as a single thickness, and the "recommended" procedure is to machine c-sink the underlying pieces if thick enough, (in this case a .025 rib and .025 skin, for a total of .050) and dimple the outer (in this case .025) skin. Even so, I am not aware of anything that _prohibits_ dimpling all three pieces. I think one issue here is that while the total thickness of the underlying structure is thick enough to machine c-sink, I would think you'd want the pieces to be perfectly flat against each other while you do the countersinking, not easy to do with the fluted ribs and all. I would be interested in knowing what A&P types know about this. BTW, I dimpled all of it. Randall Henderson randall(at)edt.com RV-6 > Hey guys I need a little riveting advice. I was preparing > my two bottom skins (F676 and F677) to rivet when I realized > I had accidently dimpled all my baggage compartment and seat > ribs. I will not be able to dimple F676 and countersink > F677 and the seat and cockpit ribs. Question is: should I > go ahead and dimple the two skins where they over lap and > then rivet them to dimpled ribs or should I flatten out the > seat and baggage compartment ribs that have been dimpled and > then rivet a dimpled skin into machine countersunk backings. > This only pertains to the single line of lap joint rivets > where the two skins meet (see lower left diagram of drawing > 36. > > chet: still having occasional stupid attacks. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: LesDrag(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 28, 1996
Subject: Oshkosh Arrival
N # |TYPE| COLORS | NAME | E-MAIL |ARRIVING ---------------------------------------------------------------------- N517RL| 6A |Dk. Green/Gray |Rob Lee |av8r(at)hic.net | 30th N47RV| 3 |Maroon w/ Silver Stripe|Jim Ayers|LesDrag(at)aol.com| 31st tenatively ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 1996
From: chester razer <crazer(at)egyptian.net>
Subject: dimpling and riveting question
Hey builders, I called Vans and they said it was OK to dimple two skins into a dimpled rib. In fact a few builders responded privately and indicated they had done that with very good results. For some reason I had it in my mind that when a skin was to be underlaid with two thin skins the two underlying skins had to be treated as one thick skin and needed to be machine countersunk. thanks to those who responded. chet razer: about to mount and drill gear mounts ________________________________________________________________________________
From: KHarrill(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 28, 1996
Subject: Wing Tip vs Fuselage Antenna
Has anyone analyzed, calculated, estimated, or SWAGed how much drag would be saved by using wing tip antennae as opposed to fuselage antennae? How would the saving translate to performance? Would the drag associated with fuselage antennae be less if mounted on the fuselage bottom in dirty air? I am at the point of needing to decide wheather to route an extra cable or conduit for a wing tip antenna. Any thoughts???? Ken Harrill RV - 6 KHarrill @aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 1996
From: Lewis <lewisjw(at)hqsocom.af.mil>
From: lewisjw
Subject: Joe Larson email Joe Larson: Send me your e-mail address. Joe Lewis lewisjw(at)hqsocom.af.mil ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RFlunker(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 28, 1996
Subject: Fuse Build Time
Ordered my Fuse last week. I'm curious as to how long it took you builders to do your fuse? Dick Flunker, Still on the wing RV-6A, N326DB-Res ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 1996
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: Re: User Fees
A while back I posted an AOPA alert regarding user fees and the gutting of the Aviation Trust fund, and also a request for private responses to see how many people responded. In case anyone's interested, I got a total of 13 responses from people who told me that they'd written to their Senator(s) in response to my post. I haven't seen anything further from AOPA so I'm sure it's not too late to send your letter if you haven't done so already..... Randall Henderson randall(at)edt.com RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 1996
From: Scott Gesele <scottg(at)villagenet.com>
Subject: rv-list: Cowl Installation
I just spoke with Bill at Van's. He indicates that the engine will "drop" slightly after it is run for the first few hours, thus lowering the spinner about 3/16". This is due to the lord mounts compressing. Van's is now recommending that the cowl be intentionally installed 3/16" lower than normal (as measured at the spinner back plate). Once the engine is run, it will drop and everything will be in alignment (theoretically). Has anybody experienced this "dropping of the engine"? I'm installing a new engine and it has not been run yet (except for Lycoming's test run). Are there any opinions out there regarding intentionally installing the cowling 3/16" lower? I've thought about splitting the difference and installing it 3/32" lower than normal. Any comments /opinions on this? Thanks in advance. -Scott N506RV (installing cowl) scottg(at)villagenet.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: NAEK31A(at)prodigy.com ( KURT L KEILBACH)
Date: Jun 28, 1996
Subject: MT Props
Does anyone have any experience or knowledge concerning MT propellers ? How do they perform ? I know they are German made , wood with composite overlay blades . I'm looking into a 2 or 3 bladed elect. controlled variable pitch model . I've seen this prop on some of the high performance airplanes , the latest being the VIPER in the most recent Kitplanes . thanks , kurt keilbach naek31a(at)prodigy.com 6-a waiting for finishing kit , bought a Legacy 2.2 that's ready to be installed ( and it's all stock ) reduction drive on its way ( 1. 9/1.0 ) and starting to look for panel instruments. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 1996
From: Pat McClung <pmc123(at)airmail.net>
Subject: Re: rv-list: Cowl Installation
Scott Gesele wrote: > > I just spoke with Bill at Van's. He indicates that the engine will "drop" > slightly after it is run for the first few hours, thus lowering the spinner > about 3/16". This is due to the lord mounts compressing. Van's is now > recommending that the cowl be intentionally installed 3/16" lower than > normal (as measured at the spinner back plate). Once the engine is run, it > will drop and everything will be in alignment (theoretically). > > Has anybody experienced this "dropping of the engine"? I'm installing a new > engine and it has not been run yet (except for Lycoming's test run). Are > there any opinions out there regarding intentionally installing the cowling > 3/16" lower? I've thought about splitting the difference and installing it > 3/32" lower than normal. Any comments /opinions on this? > > Thanks in advance. > > -Scott N506RV (installing cowl) > scottg(at)villagenet.com I've got 21 hrs on mine and it hasn't shown signs of "Dropsy", yet. How many are there in the 'first few' hours???? Mine was lined up at installation and remains the same. Pat 3XM--RV6 Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 1996
From: ammeterj(at)seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re: MT Props
>Does anyone have any experience or knowledge concerning MT >propellers ? How do they perform ? I know they are German made , wood >with composite overlay blades . I'm looking into a 2 or 3 bladed >elect. controlled variable pitch model . I've seen this prop on some >of the high performance airplanes , the latest being the VIPER in >the most recent Kitplanes . > >thanks , >kurt keilbach naek31a(at)prodigy.com >6-a waiting for finishing kit , bought a Legacy 2.2 that's ready >to be installed ( and it's all stock ) reduction drive on its way ( 1. >9/1.0 ) and starting to look for panel instruments. > > I don't know about MT props but I do have some pictures of a hub after both blades parted company. That company (no longer in business, I understand) used wood blades glued inside aluminum shafts. The shafts could be rotated by a manually operated control while in flight. Nice idea but when both blades flew off while the pilot was on top over the Cascades at 10,500 it was only good luck and damn good piloting that saved his life. The MT prop may be totally different. I'm suggesting you check thoroughly. Your luck and skill may not be as good as the above pilot should the MT have the same problem. John Ammeter ammeterj(at)seanet.com 3233 NE 95th St Seattle WA, 98115 USA RV-6 N16JA Flying 5 years ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 1996
From: Pat McClung <pmc123(at)airmail.net>
Subject: Re: Fuse Build Time
aol.com!RFlunker(at)matronics.com wrote: > > Ordered my Fuse last week. I'm curious as to how long it took you builders > to do your fuse? > > Dick Flunker, Still on the wing > RV-6A, N326DB-Res >From March 94 to May 96, flight date--That is completed with time out for Oshkosh and Van's homecoming one time each. Pat N3XM- flying with 4 hrs to go on test time. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 1996
From: ammeterj(at)seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re: rv-list: Cowl Installation
>I just spoke with Bill at Van's. He indicates that the engine will "drop" >slightly after it is run for the first few hours, thus lowering the spinner >about 3/16". This is due to the lord mounts compressing. Van's is now >recommending that the cowl be intentionally installed 3/16" lower than >normal (as measured at the spinner back plate). Once the engine is run, it >will drop and everything will be in alignment (theoretically). > >Has anybody experienced this "dropping of the engine"? I'm installing a new >engine and it has not been run yet (except for Lycoming's test run). Are >there any opinions out there regarding intentionally installing the cowling >3/16" lower? I've thought about splitting the difference and installing it >3/32" lower than normal. Any comments /opinions on this? > >Thanks in advance. > >-Scott N506RV (installing cowl) >scottg(at)villagenet.com > > Van's is RIGHT on this one. I followed their advice and installed the cowling so it was about 3/16 to 1/4" low in relation to the spinner. After about 10 to 20 hours of running the spinner is almost exactly lined up with the cowling. I have seen some RV's where the builder lined them up while building and now the spinner is as much as 3/8" lower than the cowling; not a pretty sight. Not to mention the horrendous drag you'd get from that extra frontal area. :-) John Ammeter ammeterj(at)seanet.com 3233 NE 95th St Seattle WA, 98115 USA RV-6 N16JA Flying 5 years ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rust47rg(at)one.net
Date: Jun 28, 1996
Subject: Re: rv-list: Cowl Installation
SNIP>> >Has anybody experienced this "dropping of the engine"? I'm installing a new >engine and it has not been run yet (except for Lycoming's test run). Are >there any opinions out there regarding intentionally installing the cowling >3/16" lower? I've thought about splitting the difference and installing it >3/32" lower than normal. Any comments /opinions on this? > >-Scott N506RV (installing cowl) Scott: Hang it and let it sit as long as you can before you fit the cowl. Make sure the mounts are seated in the rings. This will minimize the "SAG". I let mine hang for 6 months and have seen very little sag in 2 years of flying. Make sure you get the hard mounts on the correct (compression) side of rings and install the large washers correctly. Regards: Rusty Gossard N47RG RV-4 Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rust47rg(at)one.net
Date: Jun 28, 1996
Subject: Re: MT Props
>Does anyone have any experience or knowledge concerning MT >propellers ? How do they perform ? I know they are German made , wood >with composite overlay blades . I'm looking into a 2 or 3 bladed >elect. controlled variable pitch model . I've seen this prop on some >of the high performance airplanes , the latest being the VIPER in >the most recent Kitplanes . > >thanks , >kurt keilbach naek31a(at)prodigy.com >6-a waiting for finishing kit , bought a Legacy 2.2 that's ready >to be installed ( and it's all stock ) reduction drive on its way ( 1. >9/1.0 ) and starting to look for panel instruments. > Kurt: MT's are BIG bucks. Makes my Hartzell look cheap. I've never seen one on an RV. Regards: Rusty Gossard N47RG RV-4 Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 1996
From: Frank Smidler <smidler(at)dcwi.com>
Subject: Re: Safety Belt, was Mustang II
Louis Willig wrote: > The second lap belt, the automotive belt, is lovingly referred to as a > "Jesus Christ" belt, because,if the first one gives way, the usual exclaimation > is "Jesus Christ". And, lo and behold, we are saved (by the back-up belt). > > --Lou When skydivers first started to use tandem containers in the late 60's and early 70's they often did not trust not being able to "punch" the reserve container when they pulled the ripcord (as they could with the old belly warts). So...they tied a "Jesus String" to the top flap and ran it up over there shoulder so they could tug on it when they cut away thier main and would exclaim "Jesus I hope this works." Frank Smidler N96FS reserved (I better get building) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 26, 1996
From: Frank Smidler <smidler(at)dcwi.com>
Subject: Re: Fuel tank rib alignment
Patrick Kelley wrote: > > the tank skins are > another matter. There are no lightening holes to reach through. I started > at the top side from the spar to the leading edge and would line up the ribs > for a few holes, strap the skin down, drill and clecoe until the centerlines > started to wander, unstrap the skin, align a little more, etc. It would have > been much easier to jig the skeleton where I thought it should be (holding > the ribs in alignment with threaded rod) and mark the skins to match, as I > did with the empennage. If I ever do this again, I will ask for unpunched > skins and one piece main skins. I had the prepunched skins with my wing kit and had no problem aligning the tank ribs with a 1/4" rod and 13 collers with set screws. You put one coller on each side of a rib to hold the proper rib spacing and have enough rod sticking outboard to go into the end rib of the outer leading edge to jig vertical. The rod came from the hardware store and the 1/4" collers from a hobby shop. Frank Smidler RV6 fuselage top skins going on. N96FS reserved ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 26, 1996
From: Frank Smidler <smidler(at)dcwi.com>
Subject: Re: Grand Rapid Engine Monitor
hic.net!av8r(at)matronics.com wrote: > > Now we can do some real checking. I have a Grand Rapids (excellent by > the way) Technologies Engine monitor. CHT & EGT on #1 and #4 - Started > to record temperature spreads etc - was appalled!!! No 1 ( in cruise > ) was CHT 300 and EGT 900. While No 4 was CHT 400 and EGT 1350. Oops - > not good....far to big a spread...So.... > Rob, can you tell us how the visability of the Grand Rapid Engine Monitor is in the sun? Did you get the newer larger screan? Where did you position it on the instrument panel? Your input would be appreciated since I also plan to use it in my RV6. Frank Smidler ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 1996
From: "Mike Nellis [SFZ]" <76430.2670(at)CompuServe.COM>
Subject: Welcome to the list...
>Hi Mike, >Welcome to the rv-list..... A lot of the old Compuserve crew is over here >now. That's why you don't see much RV talk in Avsig. >How's things? Any luck in convincing the wife....? >good luck >John Hey John, actually, I've been lurking here and soaking up the information for the last 6 mos. or so. My wife is dead set against me building this plane. We're not talking fun and games here. The arguments have been fierce and I've even resorted to having a friend invite us over to dinner so they can tell her about the joy of building (I've been helping him do the wings on his Berkut). In fact we "discussed" the plane thing again tonight but still no movement. Pretty soon I'm just going to have to ask "so what's the consequences gonna be when I just do it"? That should be an interesting conversation. How's your project coming along? You should be about half way through the wings by now. Will you be going to Oshkosh? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 1996
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)ltec.net>
Subject: Re: rv-list: Cowl Installation
>I just spoke with Bill at Van's. He indicates that the engine will "drop" >slightly after it is run for the first few hours, thus lowering the spinner >about 3/16". This is due to the lord mounts compressing. Van's is now >recommending that the cowl be intentionally installed 3/16" lower than >normal (as measured at the spinner back plate). Once the engine is run, it >will drop and everything will be in alignment (theoretically). > >Has anybody experienced this "dropping of the engine"? I'm installing a new >engine and it has not been run yet (except for Lycoming's test run). Are >there any opinions out there regarding intentionally installing the cowling >3/16" lower? I've thought about splitting the difference and installing it >3/32" lower than normal. Any comments /opinions on this? >-Scott N506RV (installing cowl) >scottg(at)villagenet.com Scott, I installed my spinner 1/4" high in relation to the cowl and it worked out well. The plane has 285 hours. I have the dynafocal mounts. Results may vary with the flat (conical) mount. I think that if one had to error, I would vote for spinner too high than too low. There's a RV-6A here whose spinner is 1/2" low in relation to the cowl. I think this mis-alignment really shows up and if the spinner is a little high, it's not quite as apparent. Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)ltec.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 1996
From: dale(at)ecnet.com (dale)
Subject: fuselage jig for sale - Wisconsin
Wooden fuselage jig for sale $50.00 Dale Eau Claire, WI 715 836-7492 -- Registered ICC User check out http://www.usefulware.com/icc.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mikel(at)dimensional.com
Date: Jun 28, 1996
Subject: Re: rv-list: Cowl Installation
>Has anybody experienced this "dropping of the engine"? I'm installing a new >engine and it has not been run yet (except for Lycoming's test run). Are >there any opinions out there regarding intentionally installing the cowling >3/16" lower? I've thought about splitting the difference and installing it >3/32" lower than normal. Any comments /opinions on this? Scott: Well, in the usual way things work I put the cowel on and off and on and off and then on again, scraping nanometers of glass off each time to get the elusive perfect fit. And, by golly, it got to looking pretty good. Then, of course, I took it off the next time and put it on and it didn't fit anymore. (Sound familiar?) The end result was an unintentional drop of about 3/16". What a deal. The engine does, indeed, drop and, as with every thing else, it is just a by guess and by golly measurement/estimate. THEN, if it drops TOO much, you tell people that in cruse the engine pulls UP thereby making the spinner even with the cowel and yes, of COURSE I did that on purpose. Michael RV-4 232 SQ mikel(at)dimensional.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mikel(at)dimensional.com
Date: Jun 28, 1996
Subject: Re: MT Props
>Does anyone have any experience or knowledge concerning MT >propellers ? How do they perform ? I know they are German made , wood >with composite overlay blades . I'm looking into a 2 or 3 bladed >elect. controlled variable pitch model . I've seen this prop on some >of the high performance airplanes , the latest being the VIPER in >the most recent Kitplanes . Kurt: EXPENSIVE. Michael ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 29, 1996
Subject: Re: rv-list: Cowl Installation
Scott and fellow builders- I am aware of RVs in our area having this problem re: engine settling on new mounts following initial run and well into the break-in. Apparently it takes a little while 6-12 months to finally "bottom out" and take a compression/extension set. 3/16" to 1/4" at the spinner top sounds about right for those of you wanting to place your cowls in anticipation of this phenomena. Those with O-360 and c/s props will probably need to go 1/4". For those of you that didn't expect this, you could probably restore the engine to the original position by adding another fender washer between the bottom mounts and the block. Bear in mind that the engine prop combination may lift somewhat back to the original position (or even past) during flight so don't reduce the spinner bulkhead clearance below that recommended by Van's. Gary VanRemortel Vanremog(at)aol.com (sound-proofing in, panel powder coated, wiring done, wings going on 6A) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 29, 1996
Subject: Nav/strobe/posit lights update
Hi all: Here are some things not included in my first post about the wingtip lighting: These units are manufactured by Aeroflash. Flash (10 joule single, 12 joule double flash) rate is 72, + or - 10, per minute, not syncronized. The flash section is FAA-PMA'd, the nav/posit isn't, at this time. A good deal for us experimentals. The set includes two (single or double flash) power supplies, lamp assemblies with bulbs, and 18" leads on the strobe bulbs. I requested the longer 18" leads so the power supply could be mounted on the face of the main spar behind the landing light (for service), and the supplied leads for the strobe would still be long enough (no splicing). I can also get the "piggyback" style strobe so many mount at the top of the v stab. These are $249 for a pair ( I'll see if I can get a single unit price), plus shipping. I had this unit in my -4, and it made a steady "ping", as did a unit in my friend's -6. The wingtip mounting on the Rocket is very quiet, but this is the designed application. I don't know why one is quiet, and the other isn't. I also have access to the entire Aeroflash product line. Please, let me know if I can help! Check six! Mark mlfred(at)aol.com 512-918-8582 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 1996
From: Russ Werner <russ(at)maui.net>
Subject: Rudder stiffener question
Can someone confirm what is the proper way to put the rudder stiffners in? Is it skin-side flange opposite the other skin-side flange, with the perpendicular flanges exactly pointing at each other, or are the perpendicular flanges on opposite sides (ie one high one low)? Does this question make sense?! Graphically: | | || || || || ||____ ____|| | | | | | | OR | ____ | || || || || ||____ || | | | | | | Aloha, Russ Werner, Maui Hawaii russ(at)maui.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 29, 1996
Subject: Re: Rudder stiffener question
Russ- FWIW I mirrored and staggered them (rivet line slightly up on one skin and slightly down on opposing skin). This allows them to "nest" and protect each other at the TE during oil canning, so as not to hammer on the insides of the skin. Pictorial below: > >| | >|| ____ | >|| || >||____ || >| || >| | Carry on.- a beggar on the theshold of the void, Gary VanRemortel Vanremog(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 1996
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)ltec.net>
Subject: Fuel lube
To those that ordered some fuel lube: I've packed a few 35mm film canisters and they are ready to ship. When you receive them, you may wonder if I packaged cereal in a previous life. I packed as much as I could without spending all day. You'll understand after you receive the stuff. Anyway, it looks to me like a 35mm film canister supply will do 5 or more RV's, so you might want to share some with your fellow RVer's. I used fuel lube on all screws for the access cover plate and fuel sender. I also used it to coat the gaskets. I've used it on pipe fittings for fuel and oil. Don't use this stuff on the 37 degree flare fittings or their mating surfaces. It doesn't take much. Be sure if you used it on the pipe thread portion of AN fittings that you don't use so much that there is a chance some will be introduced into the fluid stream. My Aircraft Spruce master brake fluid reservoir leaked around the (really thin) gasket for the lid and I used a very small amount dabbed on the gasket to seal this. My nylon fittings in the top of the brake master cylinders weep a little brake fluid and I've been thinking of applying a small amount to the pipe thread on these. The uses described in this paragraph may not be the recommended uses for this product. Maybe someone on the list can give additional comments on this. Speaking of pipe threaded components. Does it seem that when you use anything but a straight fitting that the end you need to attach to is always pointed in the wrong direction? With the nylon fittings that go into the top of the brake cylinders, one position is too loose and if you rotate 360 degrees there is a possiblity of stripping the threads in the nylon. There is a general consenses that Teflon thread tape should not be used in aircraft fittings. I've used it a couple of locations using great care to make sure that there is no material that can be introduced into the system. Using this tape is one way to "tighted-up" the threads so the fitting is pointed in the proper direction. How have other builders handled this problem of getting their fittings to line up in the diesired direction? Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)ltec.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 1996
From: bcos(at)ix.netcom.com (William Costello )
Subject: Re: Rudder stiffener question
You wrote: > >Can someone confirm what is the proper way to put the rudder stiffners in? > >Is it skin-side flange opposite the other skin-side flange, with the >perpendicular flanges exactly pointing at each other, or are the >perpendicular flanges on opposite sides (ie one high one low)? Does this >question make sense?! > >Graphically: > > >| | >|| || >|| || >||____ ____|| >| | >| | >| | > > >OR > >| ____ | >|| || >|| || >||____ || >| | >| | >| | > > > >Aloha, > > >Russ Werner, Maui Hawaii >russ(at)maui.net > > They are DEFINITELY the second way above. The first way would not let you squeeze the trailing edge down to the size it needs to be. They should also overlap so that when you do squeeze the trailing edge, if the stiffeners meet, they go against each other. | ______ | | | | | | | | ______| | | The overlap is exaggerated here, but it gives the idea I guess. Best regards, -- Bill Costello | bcos(at)ix.netcom.com | Chicago | 312-445-1246 Building RV-6 or 6A | Reserved N97WC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 1996
From: Russ Werner <russ(at)maui.net>
Subject: Re: Rudder stiffener question
Thanks all for the clarification. I was pretty sure how to do it, but wanted some confirmation! Aloha, Russ Werner, Maui Hawaii russ(at)maui.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 1996
From: Espen Dahl <dahl(at)sn.no>
Subject: Re: MT Props
>>Does anyone have any experience or knowledge concerning MT >>propellers ? How do they perform ? I know they are German made , wood >>with composite overlay blades . I'm looking into a 2 or 3 bladed >>elect. controlled variable pitch model . I've seen this prop on some >>of the high performance airplanes , the latest being the VIPER in >>the most recent Kitplanes . >> >>thanks , >>kurt keilbach naek31a(at)prodigy.com >>6-a waiting for finishing kit , bought a Legacy 2.2 that's ready >>to be installed ( and it's all stock ) reduction drive on its way ( 1. >>9/1.0 ) and starting to look for panel instruments. >> There is a RV-4 flying in Norway with a 3 blade MT prop. That particular RV-4 is pictured in formation with some F-16s in Vans 1996 calendar (Dec?) I don`t have any performance numbers on the installation, but the owner has about 300 troublefree hours on it by now.(Since 1991 I believe) I have had some rides in this RV-4, and what is most impressive to me, is the way you can slow the airplane down and make a relatively steep approach without building speed. Espen Dahl Building RV-4 Oslo, Norway ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 1996
From: Patrick Kelley <patk(at)mail.ic.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel tank rib alignment
Frank Smidler wrote: > I had the prepunched skins with my wing kit and had no problem aligning > the tank ribs with a 1/4" rod and 13 collers with set screws. You put > one coller on each side of a rib to hold the proper rib spacing and have > enough rod sticking outboard to go into the end rib of the outer leading > edge to jig vertical. The rod came from the hardware store and the 1/4" > collers from a hobby shop. > > Frank Smidler > RV6 fuselage top skins going on. > N96FS reserved I tried that with the outboard L.E. ribs, but the alignment was not good. Even with ribs fluted so they lie reasonably flat and attached so that the rib aligns with the skin at the spar, I was unable to ensure that the line marked for edge distance on the rib flange would line up along the entire run. Usually the offset was only a 1/16", but if it was away from the rib web I felt very uncomfortable about my edge distance. I found that 1/16" was easy to 'horse' into position by hand while drilling, so I tossed the rod and opted for pefect rib alignment instead. Doing the same for the tank was a bear, but I at least know that the rivets fall on the centerlines of the rib flanges. Still, if I had my way, I would rather use the rod and drill the skins to match my ribs rather than the other way around. PatK - RV-6A - left tank 40 % riveted and prosealed. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 1996
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)ltec.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel tank rib alignment
>I tried that with the outboard L.E. ribs, but the alignment was not good. Even >with ribs fluted so they lie reasonably flat and attached so that the rib aligns >with the skin at the spar, I was unable to ensure that the line marked for edge >distance on the rib flange would line up along the entire run. Usually the >offset was only a 1/16", but if it was away from the rib web I felt very >uncomfortable about my edge distance. I found that 1/16" was easy to 'horse' >into position by hand while drilling, so I tossed the rod and opted for pefect >rib alignment instead. Doing the same for the tank was a bear, but I at least >know that the rivets fall on the centerlines of the rib flanges. Still, if I >had my way, I would rather use the rod and drill the skins to match my ribs >rather than the other way around. > >PatK - RV-6A - left tank 40 % riveted and prosealed. Pat, I think I'd rather drill all of the holes, as well. This is how I did my first RV and have not reached that point yet on my second, so the jury is still out. I have thought quite a bit on how to keep ribs lined up for the pre-drilled skins. I'm wondering if we could use nylon re-enforced tape. This would require that one rib, nose or main, be solidly supported so that there is absolutely no flex on any part of the rib. This rib would have to be attached solidly to an up right. Maybe you would want to this to a rib on each end. Then, you would use several strips of this tape, say 3 or 4 lengths for each side of a main rib and starting with the solidly mounted rib and work on down the wing. Measurements could be taken on the distances between ribs before each rib is stuck down. This tape is pretty sticky and has no stretch to it and I think might do a pretty good job of immobilizing the ribs. RVer's, what do you think? Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)ltec.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 1996
From: barnhart(at)a.crl.com (Dave Barnhart)
Subject: RV6 jigs available
My RV-6 fuselage came out of the jig today (in and out of the jig in 3 months). I now have the following RV-6/6A jigs available: Rv-6/6A empennage/wing jig: I made this jig myself from 2 x 4 inch rectangular steel tubing. (I would have used 4x4 wood, but the steel cost me no more than the wood would have, so what the heck.) Rv-6/6A fuselage jig: This is a wooden jig. My fuselage is the fifth one built in this jig, and the long side members are still straight as an arrow. Both of these jigs are available FREE to anyone in the Phoenix, Arizona area. All you have to do is to come and get them. PLEASE do not clutter up the rv-list with responses. Instead contact me at: e-mail: barnhart(at)a.crl.com Phone: (602) 931-6605 Best Regards, Dave Barnhart rv-6 sn 23744 N601DB fuselage out of jig Finishing kit on order ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JamesCone(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 29, 1996
Subject: Re: GotChas!! to look for
John, If you have any left, I would like two. Send me an E-Mail and let me know that you have them reserved fro me and I will drop you a check. Jim Cone jamescone(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JamesCone(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 29, 1996
Subject: Re: rv-list: Cowl Installation
There was a long article in one of the back isues of my newsletter that talked about this very issue. 1995 back issues are avaliable for $5. and a 1996 subscription is also $5. and will include the back issues for that year. The July issue is complete and is on the way to the printer now. If you are interested in my newsletter, drop me an E-mail. I will send you the back issues and your check can cross the in the snail mail. Jim Cone Editor, Van's Air Force, Tri-State Wing Newsletter jamescone(at)aol.com 422 Savannah Ridge Drive St. Charles, MO 63303 (314) 928-8703 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 1996
From: ammeterj(at)seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Fuel Line Vents
I'm cutting off the offer for fuel line vents. I have enough for all of you that have asked for them. Once the dust settles and if I find that I have more to distribute I may open up the gates again. For now, the last two to contact me were Jim Cone and Rion Bourgeois; I've got you two covered. John Ammeter ammeterj(at)seanet.com 3233 NE 95th St Seattle WA, 98115 USA RV-6 N16JA Flying 5 years ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 1996
From: ammeterj(at)seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re: GotChas!! to look for
>John, > >If you have any left, I would like two. Send me an E-Mail and let me know >that you have them reserved fro me and I will drop you a check. > >Jim Cone >jamescone(at)aol.com > > I just put your name on an envelope. Maybe I should buy a 1000 of them; I'm going to announce they're all gone now. I just hope I've got enuf for all the responses so far. John ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robbins Mitch <ROBBINM(at)chi.ntsb.gov>
Subject: rv-list: Cowl Installation
Date: Jun 29, 1996
I didn't notice any settling but my engine was hung for several weeks in >100 degree temperatures in Arizona before I fit the cowl. With regard to where it should be, the spinner cowl interface is critical, for minimum aerodynamic drag and asthetics. My $.02 I haven't set one up in a wind tunnel but accepted practice suggests that the cowl should protrude slightly above the spinner on top as Van recommends. The issue is not primarily one of minimum frontal area, but preventing boundary layer separation which produces exponentially more drag. The bottom of the cowl is at a positive angle of attack for almost all "normal" AOA's. It provides a positive pressure gradient across the spinner gap, thus eliminates potential separation regardless of minor variations in geometry. The top of the cowl, being more nearly parallel to the longitudinal axis of the airplane does not. Mitch Robbins ---------- >I just spoke with Bill at Van's. He indicates that the engine will "drop" >slightly after it is run for the first few hours, thus lowering the spinner >about 3/16". This is due to the lord mounts compressing. Van's is now >recommending that the cowl be intentionally installed 3/16" lower than >normal (as measured at the spinner back plate). Once the engine is run, it >will drop and everything will be in alignment (theoretically). > >Has anybody experienced this "dropping of the engine"? I'm installing a new >engine and it has not been run yet (except for Lycoming's test run). Are >there any opinions out there regarding intentionally installing the cowling >3/16" lower? I've thought about splitting the difference and installing it >3/32" lower than normal. Any comments /opinions on this? > >Thanks in advance. > >-Scott N506RV (installing cowl) >scottg(at)villagenet.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 30, 1996
From: Dr John Cocker <jcocker(at)interhop.net>
Subject: Canopy/fuselage interface
I am having a problem I dn't recall seeing discussed before. When I lift up the canopy, the front edge catches on the fuselage sheet in front of it. Because of the hinge position, the canopy moves up and foreward. The two edges catch. I have been trimming back the fuselage skin, so now there is a gap, which is unsightly, and it is still catching. Any solutions ? John Cocker (Just starting to wire things up) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mikel(at)dimensional.com
Date: Jun 30, 1996
Subject: Re: Couple o' questions
I have two questions re: RV-4s 1. How is the front canopy fairing (the fiberglass) attached to the plexiglass and front canopy skin. In looking at the ones at a recent flyin the methods are many and varied. Do the rivets that attache the plexiglass to the frame go through the fairing or is the fairing laid on top and then secured by some other means. It would make more sense that the rivets go through. Some installations have rivets throught the fairing into the front skin also. 2. Are the "approximate measurements" given in the plans for the aileron push rods (both the long aluminum and shorter steel) close to being accurate? I am about to shove I mean gently slide the wings on and off and on and would like to minimize the number of times they go on and off. There is no drawing that shows what nutural position of the aileron bellcrank is to help in determining length (THAT would be handy). Michael RV-4 232 SQ mikel(at)dimensional.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 30, 1996
From: John Darby <johnd@our-town.com>
Subject: Re: GotChas!! to look for
John; Do these fit inside of the alum. tube, or inside of the fitting that Vans says to put on the bottom of the fuse.? Reason I ask, I would like two of them (my screens keep blowing off), but I have those AN fittings that are threaded (bulkhead fittings) and then sliced off at an angle below the threaded part. John D >I came across a unique screen cover for the 3/16" AL fuel vent lines. I >found a metal screen that has a tube extending about 3/16" long from the >screen. The tube has an OD just the right size to force fit inside the >3/16" AL line. >I have a few of these left and, if anyone is interested, I could send you >two of them. To cover shipping you should send a check (or cash) for $1.00. John Darby RV6 N61764 flying johnd@our-town.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 30, 1996
From: Dan Boudro <dboudro(at)nmia.com>
Subject: Re: Couple o' questions
See responses below: Dan Boudro RV-4 N9167Z Albuquerque, NM dboudro(at)nmia.com On Sun, 30 Jun 1996 dimensional.com!mikel(at)matronics.com wrote: > I have two questions re: RV-4s > > 1. How is the front canopy fairing (the fiberglass) attached to the > plexiglass and front canopy skin. In looking at the ones at a recent flyin > the methods are many and varied. Do the rivets that attche the plexiglass > to the frame go through the fairing or is the fairing laid on top and then > secured by some other means. It would make more sense that the rivets go > through. Some installations have rivets throught the fairing into the front > skin also. This one's easy, I didn't make a fairing. I sealed the plexiglass to the skin with clear Silicone. Seems to work great, my wife and I just got back from Madison, WI. we encountered some slight rain and didn't have a problem, haven't experienced heavy rain yet but I try to avoid it anyway with my wood prop. > > 2. Are the "approximate measurements" given in the plans for the aileron > push rods (both the long aluminum and shorter steel) close to being > accurate? I am about to shove I mean gently slide the wings on and off and > on and would like to minimize the number of times they go on and off. There > is no drawing that shows what nutural position of the aileron bellcrank is > to help in determining length (THAT would be handy). I gently slid the wings in too (with a big hammer), I then attached the ailerons, put the bellcrank in about the middle of its movement, get the aileron/bellcrank pushrod length set then proceed to set the control/bellcrank pushrod length. This seemed to work fairly well. You've got some adjustment but not a whole lot (maybe 1/2") > > Michael > RV-4 232 SQ > mikel(at)dimensional.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 30, 1996
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)ltec.net>
Subject: Re: Canopy/fuselage interface
>I am having a problem I dn't recall seeing discussed before. >When I lift up the canopy, the front edge catches on the fuselage sheet in >front of it. >Because of the hinge position, the canopy moves up and foreward. The two >edges catch. I have been trimming back the fuselage skin, so now there is a >gap, which is unsightly, and it is still catching. >Any solutions ? > >John Cocker (Just starting to wire things up) John, I had a little interference in this area, as well. You're right, I don't remember discussion on this subject. I beveled the front fuselage skin and the front canopy skin a little. I also had to trim to a little larger gap than I thought ideal. I didn't do too much of this until the skin was riveted down, which did improve the situation. If the problem is severe, you may have to resort to bending the front canopy skin up just a little. If the front canopy skin isn't riveted on yet you might be able to gain some height (and needed clearance) by inserting a shim under the front canopy skin. I thought, that on my next six, I might mount the canopy just a tad bit higher for clearance. You don't want to have joints (canopy fit, cowl fit, etc.) too tight as you'll want to allow room so the painted edges don't hit each other and chip paint. Also, rounded edges hold paint better than squared off edges. Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)ltec.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 30, 1996
From: "Thomas J. Kopp" <tkopp(at)mixcom.com>
Subject: Re: Couple o' questions
Dan Boudro wrote: > just got back from Madison, WI. we encountered some slight rain and Well...I'm a lurker on the list here (only things I've ever flown is radio controlled airplanes and helicopters)... Just curious if any of you are in the Milwaukee, WI area...? Be kind of nice to see either a work-in-progress or a finished copy...mostly interested in the -6 and -6A or maybe the 4. I'm a fairly long way away from building my own, but would like to do it someday (5-10 years from now, maybe)...my interest is torn between the RV's and the -Eze variants (berkut, e-racer) Tom -- Thomas J. Kopp - Milwaukee, WI tkopp(at)mixcom.com '95 Z-28, PEG2, T's, M6, RS-As 13.940 @ 101.47 Memphis #23 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BrabstonD(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 30, 1996
Subject: Riveting Spar Strips To Spar Webb
Van's Aircraft Co: I'd like for you to respons to the following problem, please. I'm also sending this to RV-LIST to see what other builders have been doing in cases like this, and to help anyone getting ready to drive spar rivets. After reading the instructions and looking at the plans, I concluded that all of the # 6 rivets in the wing spars were to be installed with the shop head aft. That worked great (flange strips and webbs fit together real tight) until I got to station 71.5 where the W606A spar web was not sandwiched between the heavy spar strips. Of course that ment , the shop heads went aganist the thinner .040" spar webb. The rivets drove down good and tight. But, after I finished driving them I noticed that W606A was not held as tightly against spar strip W606C as before. It appears that driving the rivets caused a slight bulge around the holes in the .040" material resulting in a small gap (about .008") midway between the rivets. The spar webb is held tightly against the flange strip at the rivets but does a gradual separaion to about .008" at the point midway between the rivets. I think this could have been prevented by placing the factory heads on the .040 side and driving the shop heads on the flange strip side. Did I do something wrong? Is this slight separation common? Will this slight separation cause a problem? If the separation is not acceptable, what is a solution? Thanks, Doug Brabston ________________________________________________________________________________
From: gksugar(at)gate.net (gregory warr)
Subject: Re: Couple o' questions
Date: Jun 30, 1996
In article dimensional.com!mikel(at)matronics.com writes: >Received: from matronics.com by netcomsv.netcom.com with UUCP (8.6.12/SMI-4.1) >Received: by matronics.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) >Errors-To: bounces(at)matronics.com >From: dimensional.com!mikel(at)matronics.com >Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 10:50:07 -0600 (MDT) >Posted-Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 10:50:07 -0600 (MDT) >Message-Id: <199606301650.KAA23635(at)blackhole.dimensional.com> >X-Sender: mikel(at)dimensional.com >X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV-List: Couple o' questions >Sender: owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com >Precedence: bulk >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >I have two questions re: RV-4s >1. How is the front canopy fairing (the fiberglass) attached to the >plexiglass and front canopy skin. In looking at the ones at a recent flyin >the methods are many and varied. Do the rivets that attache the plexiglass >to the frame go through the fairing or is the fairing laid on top and then >secured by some other means. It would make more sense that the rivets go >through. Some installations have rivets throught the fairing into the front >skin also. >2. Are the "approximate measurements" given in the plans for the aileron >push rods (both the long aluminum and shorter steel) close to being >accurate? I am about to shove I mean gently slide the wings on and off and >on and would like to minimize the number of times they go on and off. There >is no drawing that shows what nutural position of the aileron bellcrank is >to help in determining length (THAT would be handy). >Michael >RV-4 232 SQ >mikel(at)dimensional.com Michael, in response to your second question I found the demensions to be fairly close. There is a lot of adjustment once the initial installation is made.Once this is done you can determine where your ailerons will be set in relation to the wing tip and trailing edge of flap.You also have the max/min degree travel for the ailerol to be set.(don't foget the nut plates on the bottom inboard wing panel that fasten wing and bottom skin.)....First question....if my memory serves me the canopy is fitted,trimmed,drilled and rivited....temporarily. The canopy skin is then trimmed,fitted,drilled and clecoed in place. The part of the skin next to the "glass" is flared outward so it lays parallel,or smoothly against it. Final drilling.....Through skin , "glass" and canopy bow is done next. The remaining part of the canopy skin is drilled (# 40 ) and clecoed in place. When all is done and your happy with the fit you disassemble, debur and get it ready for the final assembly. As a final thought...,what do the directions say? I know they are a little vague at times. good luck Greg Warr N 524 KW gksugar(at)gate.net old pilot.....new plane ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 30, 1996
From: joehine(at)mi.net (joehine)
Subject: plexiglass cracks.
Listers: There was a discussion here a few months ago about the repairing of plexiglass cracks. I saved the messages I wanted but they since have been accidently deleated. (no hard copy) One person wrote of a method of fixing a crack by dissolving pieces of plexiglass in, I believe, MEK and using the mixture to weld the crack back togeather. If the person who posted that method is still on the list, could you repost it or send it to me privately. I have a small drill stopped crack I would like to try and repair and I can't find the post in the archives. thanks Joe joehine(at)mi.net Comp. 9, Site 8, RR#4 506-452-1072 Home Fredericton, NB 506-452-3495 Work Canada, E3B 4X5 Nobody on their death bed has ever been heard to say "Geeze,I wish I'd spent more time at work" ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 30, 1996
From: Rick Solana <102131.2407(at)CompuServe.COM>
Subject: Test - not getting messages
Test message. I'm not getting messages for the last few days. Did this get through? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Michael C. Gamble" <mgamble(at)chiba.netxn.com>
Subject: Test - not getting messages
Date: Jun 30, 1996
------ =_NextPart_000_01BB668F.B18EC1A0 Rick: I got it, here in Bakersfield! Mick ---------- From: Rick Solana[SMTP:CompuServe.COM!102131.2407(at)matronics.com] Sent: Sunday, June 30, 1996 1:09 PM Subject: RV-List: Test - not getting messages Test message. I'm not getting messages for the last few days. Did this get through? ------ =_NextPart_000_01BB668F.B18EC1A0 eJ8+IhYVAQaQCAAEAAAAAAABAAEAAQeQBgAIAAAA5AQAAAAAAADoAAENgAQAAgAAAAIAAgABBJAG ACQBAAABAAAADAAAAAMAADADAAAACwAPDgAAAAACAf8PAQAAAEkAAAAAAAAAgSsfpL6jEBmdbgDd AQ9UAgAAAABydi1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20AU01UUABydi1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20A AAAAHgACMAEAAAAFAAAAU01UUAAAAAAeAAMwAQAAABYAAABydi1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20A AAADABUMAQAAAAMA/g8GAAAAHgABMAEAAAAYAAAAJ3J2LWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbScAAgEL MAEAAAAbAAAAU01UUDpSVi1MSVNUQE1BVFJPTklDUy5DT00AAAMAADkAAAAACwBAOgEAAAACAfYP AQAAAAQAAAAAAAADNDcBCIAHABgAAABJUE0uTWljcm9zb2Z0IE1haWwuTm90ZQAxCAEEgAEAKQAA AFJFOiBSVi1MaXN0OiBUZXN0IC0gbm90IGdldHRpbmcgbWVzc2FnZXMApA0BBYADAA4AAADMBwYA HgAOABcACQAAACUBASCAAwAOAAAAzAcGAB4ADgAWADYAAABRAQEJgAEAIQAAADJDMkVCMDU2N0ZE MkNGMTFCNzVCMzRCQ0ZEQzAwNDFGAFsHAQOQBgBwAwAAEgAAAAsAIwAAAAAAAwAmAAAAAAALACkA AAAAAAMANgAAAAAAQAA5AEAj4FXKZrsBHgBwAAEAAAApAAAAUkU6IFJWLUxpc3Q6IFRlc3QgLSBu b3QgZ2V0dGluZyBtZXNzYWdlcwAAAAACAXEAAQAAABYAAAABu2bKVeBWsC4t0n8Rz7dbNLz9wAQf AAAeAB4MAQAAAAUAAABTTVRQAAAAAB4AHwwBAAAAGAAAAG1nYW1ibGVAY2hpYmEubmV0eG4uY29t AAMABhBousujAwAHEPIAAAAeAAgQAQAAAGUAAABSSUNLOklHT1RJVCxIRVJFSU5CQUtFUlNGSUVM RE1JQ0stLS0tLS0tLS0tRlJPTTpSSUNLU09MQU5BU01UUDpDT01QVVNFUlZFQ09NMTAyMTMxMjQw N0BNQVRST05JQ1NDT01TAAAAAAIBCRABAAAA4AEAANwBAAC4AwAATFpGdYLSYUD/AAoBDwIVAqgF 6wKDAFAC8gkCAGNoCsBzZXQyNwYABsMCgzIDxQIAcHJCcRHic3RlbQKDM3cC5AcTAoB9CoAIzwnZ O/EWDzI1NQKACoENsQtg4G5nMTAzFFALChRRDQvyYwBAB/BpY2s6IQqFSSBnbwVAaXRoLCBoBJBl HAADoEIkYWsEkHNmCJBsZHYhCoUKhU0bAR2cCvRsEGkxODAC0WktMTw0NA3wDNAgkwtZMTbXCqAD YBPQYwVALSK3CofXIWsMMCI2RgNhOiO+IjYfDIIa4wYABvAAcGFbUxBNVFA6CFBtcHUBBmF2ZS5D T00hgRkwMjEzMS4yILA0N0AAwHQDYAMAY3PyLgWgbV0jXyRtBmACMAMlnyarU3VuZGF5TRwwSi9A HIAzMBwwMQg5OTYwMDowOSDMUE0rHyRtVG8tXyasaFYgTAQAdDEPLC513GJqInEzLzQ9LTUyN+Cm VAeQIpEgbhvhZxHAknQLgGcgB4FzYTsA5nMevx/DMzYhNxpFMoeTOmI7hS4gG6AnbTq/rTvCIAIQ BcB0HFAgC2A9OnFmB9EvYSqwP9BEaT5kQbEEAEBiQbEDYHVn/Gg/HZw8fz2PIkUKhRUxAgBIcAMA EBAAAAAAAwAREAAAAABAAAcwYKwhTcpmuwFAAAgwYKwhTcpmuwEeAD0AAQAAAAUAAABSRTogAAAA AKHi ------ =_NextPart_000_01BB668F.B18EC1A0-- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: LHaines794(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 30, 1996
Subject: Re: Whatzit?(Good Deals on Parts)
(Robbins Mitch) writes: << Narco 824 Digital Nav >> Just curious, never heard of it before. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: SportAV8R(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 30, 1996
Subject: Re: Fuel lube
Bob- I've not finished the dual brake installation yet, but I believe Van's now supplies brass fittings instead of nylon. Same problem with alignment of the elbows... my A&P suggested non-hardening Permatex Form-A-Gasket on the pipe threads, which I did. So far no leaks, but then, so far there's never been a drop of fluid in the system!! Bill Boyd ________________________________________________________________________________
From: av8r(at)hic.net
Date: Jun 30, 1996
Subject: Re: Couple o' questions
>2. Are the "approximate measurements" given in the plans for the aileron >push rods (both the long aluminum and shorter steel) close to being >accurate? I am about to shove I mean gently slide the wings on and off and >on and would like to minimize the number of times they go on and off. There >is no drawing that shows what nutural position of the aileron bellcrank is >to help in determining length (THAT would be handy). >Michael >RV-4 232 SQ >mikel(at)dimensional.com Hi Mike, By far the eaiest way to do this sort of stuff is with the wings out of the fuse. i.e. do not put the wings on (yet)!! Place the wings on two saw horses, about 2/3 out to the tips. They do of course need to be joined by the spar re-inforcement joining plates at the center. Hang the ailerons - you can now attach the joystick assemblies where you can easily get at them to do pushrod lengths etc. without the interference of that fuselage :) Hope this helps - it was one of the best tips I got! Regards, Rob Lee av8r(at)hic.net RV6A flying ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Couple o' questions (aileron rigging)
Date: Jun 30, 1996
From: Mike Kukulski <kukulski(at)indirect.com>
You wrote: >Are the "approximate measurements" given in the plans for the aileron >push rods (both the long aluminum and shorter steel) close to being >accurate? I am about to shove I mean gently slide the wings on and off and >on and would like to minimize the number of times they go on and off. There >is no drawing that shows what nutural position of the aileron bellcrank is >to help in determining length (THAT would be handy). You asked at the right time - just finished rigging the ailerons in my RV-4. My short steel pushrods were sized per the plans. I fitted the long ones by riveting on the fitting at one end, inserting it into the wing from the tip end (tip not attached), and then attaching it via the rod end to the bellcrank in the wing. With the aileron and control column clamped in the neutral position, I could then very accurately mark the large pushrod for the proper length. I do have a neutral position for the bellcrank specified on my plans (sheet #16). I have a penciled in revision that specifies that in the neutral position, there is a 1-3/16" distance between the center of the bellcrank bolt hole that attaches the large pushrod and the inboard vertical face of the angle that the bellcrank pivots on. This came from an RVator plans update from eons ago. My serial number is 1811, so my yellowed plans have lots of pencil revisions. Don't take the wing off until you've done everything - set incidence angle, fabricated fuel tank mount, root fairings, tubing runs, flap and aileron rigging, etc.. Then the second time you install it, it stays on. That's my plan anyway. Mike Kukulski (kukulski(at)indirect.com) RV-4 N96MK , removing the second wing TODAY. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WStucklen(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 01, 1996
Subject: Re: restrictor fittings
>I have a question about this. (Big surprise, huh?) I assume that for a -4 >fitting you use a -4 rivet. But the rivet head sticks out around the >perimeter of the flared fitting. Won't that interfere with the sealing of >the tube? Or does the tube/rivet area "mash" itself to fit? (sounds >doubtful) > >Sigh, >Ed Bundy > > > Cut the head off........ ________________________________________________________________________________ Importance: normal
Subject: WG: MT prop
From: Klaus Roth <rothk(at)oims.med.siemens.de>
Date: Jul 01, 1996
Sorry to the list, but I couldn't send direct to Kurt. - ---------- Von: Roth Klaus An: 'Kurt Keilbach' Betreff: MT prop Datum: Montag, 1. Juli 1996 12:44 Hello Kurt, Just I ordered a MT 3 blade constant speed prop for my RV 4. It is expensive, (14 000 DM, about 9500$) but because our request for low noise level here in Germany I think I can achieve it with this prop and two additional mufflers. Send a fax to: mt-propeller Germany, 9429 8432 and you will get more information I talked with Michael Muehlbauer. He is the "junior boss". A lot of airplanes have mt props here in Germany, and I never heard a problem. Best regards Klaus Roth, RV 4 Germany rothk(at)oims.med.siemens.de ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 1996
From: n21pe(at)ix.netcom.com (Peter B. Mortensen)
Subject: Re: Test - not getting messages
You wrote: > >Test message. I'm not getting messages for the last few days. Did this get through? > Yes. Peter Mortensen n21pe(at)ix.netcom.com _____________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6junkie(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 01, 1996
Subject: Re: Fuse Build Time
I had my fuselage in and out of the jig in 90 days...it only took an additional 2 years from that point!!! That was working 15-20 hours a week. Keep on going. Gary Corde RV-6 N211GC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 1996
From: ward9(at)llnl.gov (Rich Ward)
Subject: Re: Fuel lube
Wyoming with my RV.) You might E-mail me off the list & tell me your >sending the money and I'll try to have everything packed and ready (don't >want to fill a bunch of canisters that won't be mailed). Don't forget to >include your name and mailing address. > >Bob Skinner BSkinner(at)ltec.net Bob, I'll be sending my five buck off in a day or so. Rich Ward ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WStucklen(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 01, 1996
Subject: Re: Canopy/fuselage interface
> am having a problem I dn't recall seeing discussed before. >When I lift up the canopy, the front edge catches on the fuselage sheet in >front of it. >Because of the hinge position, the canopy moves up and foreward. The two >edges catch. I have been trimming back the fuselage skin, so now there is a >gap, which is unsightly, and it is still catching. >Any solutions ? > >John Cocker (Just starting to wire things up) > > John: I assume you are talking about the tilt up canopy, not the sliding canopy. I have the tiltup on my -6A. I had the same problem. I found that the front /top fuselage skin should be flat in the center area where it butts up against the canopy skin. If it's bulged up, even a little, and the gap between the canopy and forward skin is tight, they will catch each other when the canopy is tilted up. By putting a slight downward bent edge on the forward/top fuse skin, beveling both skin edges slightly, then adjusting the gap between them, will eliminate the problem. Fred Stucklen RV-6A N925RV wstucklen(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WStucklen(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 01, 1996
Subject: Re: rv-list: Cowl Installation
>Has anybody experienced this "dropping of the engine"? I'm installing a new >engine and it has not been run yet (except for Lycoming's test run). Are >there any opinions out there regarding intentionally installing the cowling >3/16" lower? I've thought about splitting the difference and installing it >3/32" lower than normal. Any comments /opinions on this? > >Thanks in advance. > >-Scott N506RV (installing cowl) >scottg(at)villagenet.com > > I've put on 715 Hrs in 2 Years, 9 Months. My spinner has falen about 1/4"..... Fred Stucklen RV-6A N925RV wstucklen(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 1996
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)ltec.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel lube
>Bob- I've not finished the dual brake installation yet, but I believe Van's >now supplies brass fittings instead of nylon. Same problem with alignment of >the elbows... my A&P suggested non-hardening Permatex Form-A-Gasket on the >pipe threads, which I did. So far no leaks, but then, so far there's never >been a drop of fluid in the system!! > >Bill Boyd Bill, The brass fittings will take a little more torque, I'm sure. I might go to a straight fitting and longer tubing to my reservoir. I'm putting off any "under panel" work until cooler weather. Bob Skinner ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 1996
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: Re: Couple o' questions
> >2. Are the "approximate measurements" given in the plans for the aileron > >push rods (both the long aluminum and shorter steel) close to being > >accurate? I am about to shove I mean gently slide the wings on and off and > >on and would like to minimize the number of times they go on and off. There > >is no drawing that shows what nutural position of the aileron bellcrank is > >to help in determining length (THAT would be handy). Yes they're close. I don't remember exactly what I ended up cutting mine at but I think if you cut em to the length specified you'd be fine. I did, however, first check everything at the NEUTRAL POSITION as shown on dwg. #19A, upper left corner, just below where the Aileron Bellcrank Plate is depicted, view labeled "Top View". Randall Henderson randall(at)edt.com RV-6. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 1996
From: "Johnson, Steve" <spjohnson(at)msmail.mmmg.com>
Subject: Address Change
I will be unsubscribing here at work due to a lot of changes going on as Imation breaks off from 3M. I am on the list at home and will be getting my mail at my address there. Steve Johnson spjohnsn(at)ix.netcom.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 1996
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: Re: Couple o' questions
> I did, however, first check everything at the NEUTRAL POSITION as shown on > dwg. #19A, upper left corner, just below where the Aileron Bellcrank > Plate is depicted, view labeled "Top View". OOPS -- that was for the -6... did you have a -4? I'll bet it's on the dwgs for that too, but I don't know for sure. Randall Henderson randall(at)edt.com RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 1996
From: "Larson, Joe" <Joseph.P.Larson(at)nmb.norwest.com> (Joe Larson)
Subject: Navaid Devices
I asked about where the Naviad Devices autopilot servo goes a week or so ago. The answer at the time was that I could install the servo underneath the seats. I just called Navaid to see what they could say. He did point out that most pilots are installing in the wing instead. He said it's a much easier installation in the wing if you do so during construction. Other tidbits I got from him: 1. Lead time right now is about 3 weeks. He expects this to extend to 4-6 weeks for a few months immediately following Oshkosh. 2. They do not recommend use of the autopilot near the ground or during IFR flight. (To me: that means I'll turn it off once I'm established inbound on my approaches.) He didn't think their unit was legal for IFR use, but queries to the FAA on that point have gone unanswered. I'll install a TSO'd turn coordinator and only use the autopilot to hold a heading. 3. Unit can be overridden in flight if it gets cranky. It has a "safety clutch". Figured if I had these questions, others did, too.... -Joe -- Joe Larson ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rust47rg(at)one.net
Date: Jul 01, 1996
Subject: Re: Navaid Devices
>2. They do not recommend use of the autopilot near the ground or during IFR > flight. (To me: that means I'll turn it off once I'm established inbound > on my approaches.) He didn't think their unit was legal for IFR use, but > queries to the FAA on that point have gone unanswered. I'll install a > TSO'd turn coordinator and only use the autopilot to hold a heading. Joe: I've had one in my 4 for 18 months. It works as well as any certified wing leveler I've flown with. Actually better than some. Read between the lines in their answers. Product liability. And when you're up in the clouds and getting vectored all over the place and you need to switch charts be sure not to turn your non TSO'd wing leveler on.....just let it roll over on it's back.:) By the way , mines under the seat and thats where I'd put it if I were to do it again. Regards: Rusty Gossard N47RG RV-4 Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 1996
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)ltec.net>
Subject: Re: Navaid Devices
>I just called Navaid to see what they could say. He did point out that most >pilots are installing in the wing instead. He said it's a much easier >installation in the wing if you do so during construction. >Joe Larson Joe. I don't know if you're going to put it in the four or six. I've got one in my RV-6 and it is mounted under the passenger seat. The unit works very well. I intend to put the servo in the wing on the six that I'm building now. When mounting under the seat, location becomes critical because of the great for-aft movement of the stick. When mounting in the wing, you have less movement of the aileron push tube to contend with and installation and service access could be made a little easier. Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)ltec.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WCannon313(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 01, 1996
Subject: Fwd: First flight of N36WC
--------------------- Subj: First flight of N36WC Date: 96-06-30 23:56:23 EDT From: WCannon313 Wanted to take a moment to announce the first flight of RV-6 N36WC on 6/29/96 at Boeing field in Seattle. It was a beautiful 60 degree calm morning, the taxi testing was done, the FAA man had paid a visit, and I couldn't think of any reason not to fly the sucker. Everything went exactly as planned and I orbited the field at about 1500' (under the TCA) for 15 minutes and then brought it in for a landing, absolutely no problems!! It's now a day later I have five hours and half a dozen landings and things couldn't be sweeter. The 0-360 with a constant speed provides great climb performance, I haven't wrung out the top end yet but I'm sure I'll be pleased. Stick with it!!! Walt Cannon N36WC Seattle, WA. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: EBundy2620(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 01, 1996
Subject: Exhaust
Does anyone have any info/opinions on "Snowline" Welding & Fabrication? They make SS exhaust systems for RV's. Apparently these are the ones that ACS sells, and they have an ad in "Kitplanes". I've only heard good things about the Vetterman exhaust, but I've had one on back order with Van's for quite a while now, and they have no idea when they'll be in stock. Thanks, Ed Bundy ebundy2620(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 1996
From: ammeterj(at)seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re: Fwd: First flight of N36WC
> >--------------------- >Forwarded message: >Subj: First flight of N36WC >Date: 96-06-30 23:56:23 EDT >From: WCannon313 >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > >Wanted to take a moment to announce the first flight of RV-6 N36WC on 6/29/96 >at Boeing field in Seattle. It was a beautiful 60 degree calm morning, the >taxi testing was done, the FAA man had paid a visit, and I couldn't think of >any reason not to fly the sucker. Everything went exactly as planned and I >orbited the field at about 1500' (under the TCA) for 15 minutes and then >brought it in for a landing, absolutely no problems!! It's now a day later I >have five hours and half a dozen landings and things couldn't be sweeter. The >0-360 with a constant speed provides great climb performance, I haven't wrung >out the top end yet but I'm sure I'll be pleased. > >Stick with it!!! > > >Walt Cannon >N36WC >Seattle, WA. > > Congratulations, Walt; it seems only a year or so ago that you had the wing in the jig. You must like it. Five hours in the first two days is pretty good. Be sure to bring it to Arlington. You won't need the special rate we've got for Arlington tickets now. You qualify for the 'pilot' rate on your own. John Ammeter ammeterj(at)seanet.com 3233 NE 95th St Seattle WA, 98115 USA RV-6 N16JA Flying 5 years ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 1996
From: Ted French <french(at)computime.bc.ca>
Subject: Nose gear vibration
Hi folks. My name is Ted French and I have about 5 hours on my RV-6A. It flies beautifully and is a joy to handle. However, when I land I get a very pronounced vibration in the nose gear. I have taken the fairing off and when I do the vibration goes away. I suspect that I have to balance the fairing around the axis of the axle. Has anyone on the list run into a similiar problem. Any suggestions gratefully accepted. Thanks Ted French RV-6A C-FXCS Prince George BC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 1996
From: thayer(at)sirius.com (Thayer Syme)
Subject: Re: Fwd: First flight of N36WC
>Wanted to take a moment to announce the first flight of RV-6 N36WC on 6/29/96 >at Boeing field in Seattle. It was a beautiful 60 degree calm morning, the Well done Walt, and thanks for the inspiration. Hope all goes well frome here on out. Thayer Syme San Francisco ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David W.S. King" <KingD(at)direct.ca>
Subject: Re: Exhaust
>Does anyone have any info/opinions on "Snowline" Welding & Fabrication? They >make SS exhaust systems for RV's. Subject to correction of somewhat faulty memory ;-] Snowline I believe has job'd out then eventually took over fabrication of the Ultimate aircraft line of airframes and components. Needless to say thier work is quite accdeptable (that is if I am remembering the right place ;-) Cheers Dave Dave King KingD(at)Direct.Ca ________________________________________________________________________________
From: OrndorffG(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 02, 1996
Subject: Re: Nose gear vibration
Ted , check the shimmie damper tightness. Also if you touch down alittle to fast the nose wheel will vibrate. any other question call 817-438-3280 or write....george orndorff ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WStucklen(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 02, 1996
Subject: Re: Nose gear vibration
<< Hi folks. My name is Ted French and I have about 5 hours on my RV-6A. It flies beautifully and is a joy to handle. However, when I land I get a very pronounced vibration in the nose gear. I have taken the fairing off and when I do the vibration goes away. I suspect that I have to balance the fairing around the axis of the axle. Has anyone on the list run into a similiar problem. Any suggestions gratefully accepted. Thanks Ted French RV-6A C-FXCS Prince George BC >> Ted: The ONLY problems I've had with the nose wheel on my -6A is a shimmy if the tension has not been reset properly. By tension I'm referring to the test that Van outlines in the instruction manual for a required 20 lb pull at the wheel axil, adjustable by the pivot axle nut. The tension will change as the arm bushings seat into the axle, and as the assembly loosens up in general. The tighter you can make the tension, the less problems you will have. Also, in the drawing I have, the U-611 disc springs are shown back to back against the axle nut. I found that placing one on the top, and one on the bottom of the arm, resulted in a more even tension adjustment. Each spring faces the arm (ie, the largest contact area). In fact, when assembled per the drawings, I had more shimmy related problems. I have found that, even when set properly, the nose wheel can be castered off center during landings in very strong cross winds. This usually results in a significant shimmy when the nose wheel touches the runnway. Usually, by lifting the wheel (with back stick pressure) and touching it down LIGHTLY, will allow it to straighten out without a shimmy. When you're concentrating on the vigors of a strong cross wind this process can get difficult. I usually check the nose wheel tension at every oil change. If you have had a shimmy condition, be sure to check the WD-631 axle flange. I have replace mine once already, due to cracking around the AN5-17A mounting bolt holes. Hope that helps..... Fred Stucklen RV-6A N925RV wstucklen(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RICKRV6(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 02, 1996
Subject: Re: Fuse Build Time
On my RV6, from the time I started work on the firewall to the point I turned the fuselage over, took 232 hours. There was still a lot of fuselage work to be done at this point. From the time I started the fuse to the time I began mounting flying surfaces (which directly preceeded finish kit work) took 451 hours. Rick McBride RV6 N523JC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Greg Bordelon <greg(at)brokersys.com>
Subject: Fwd: First flight of N36WC
Date: Jul 02, 1996
Congradulations Walt!!!! I'm sure your experiencing one of the more critical RV grins right now. The break your face, ear to ear grin.... :-)) Well done! See yah at Oskosh? Greg Bordelon greg(at)brokersys.com ---------- From: aol.com!WCannon313(at)matronics.com[SMTP:aoFrom owner-rv-list Tue Jul 2 09:37:03 1996 From: mikel(at)dimensional.com Date: Tue, 2 Jul 1996 10:31:21 -0600 (MDT) Subject: Re: RV-List: Fwd: First flight of N36WC > >--------------------- >Forwarded message: >Subj: First flight of N36WC >Date: 96-06-30 23:56:23 EDT >From: WCannon313 >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > >Wanted to take a moment to announce the first flight of RV-6 N36WC on 6/29/96 >at Boeing field in Seattle. It was a beautiful 60 degree calm morning, the >taxi testing was done, the FAA man had paid a visit, and I couldn't think of >any reason not to fly the sucker. Everything went exactly as planned and I >orbited the field at about 1500' (under the TCA) for 15 minutes and then >brought it in for a landing, absolutely no problems!! It's now a day later I >have five hours and half a dozen landings and things couldn't be sweeter. The >0-360 with a constant speed provides great climb performance, I haven't wrung >out the top end yet but I'm sure I'll be pleased. > >Stick with it!!! > > >Walt Cannon >N36WC >Seattle, WA. WAHOO!! Then it is possible...mine WILL fly some day!!!! Oh, good; I was beginning to wonder. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>CONGRATS!!!!<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Now: we need test flight reports to keep us groundlings dreaming. Michael mikel(at)dimensional.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 1996
From: Jerry Springer <jerryflyrv(at)village.yvv.com>
Subject: Re: Navaid Devices
> > >I just called Navaid to see what they could say. He did point out that most > >pilots are installing in the wing instead. He said it's a much easier > >installation in the wing if you do so during construction. > >Joe Larson > > Joe. I don't know if you're going to put it in the four or six. I've got > one in my RV-6 and it is mounted under the passenger seat. The unit works > very well. I intend to put the servo in the wing on the six that I'm > building now. When mounting under the seat, location becomes critical > because of the great for-aft movement of the stick. When mounting in the > wing, you have less movement of the aileron push tube to contend with and > installation and service access could be made a little easier. > Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)ltec.net Joe I think that where ever you mount it you will be happy with the way it works. I have mine under the seat and hooked up to my Flybuddy GPS and it works great. Bob Did you hook your push pull rod up to the bottom of the passenger stick or to the bottom of the pilot stick? I hooked mine up to the pilot side and this does away with some of the problems of the fore-aft movement of the controls. I also made a little opening in the cover that goes over the servo, with a little cover that goes over this opening so that If I need to get to the clutch for adjustments I can do so with out takeing it out of the airplane. Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS first flight July 14,1989 :-) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mikel(at)dimensional.com
Date: Jul 02, 1996
Subject: Re: Exhaust
>Does anyone have any info/opinions on "Snowline" Welding & Fabrication? They >make SS exhaust systems for RV's. > >Apparently these are the ones that ACS sells, and they have an ad in >"Kitplanes". > >I've only heard good things about the Vetterman exhaust, but I've had one on >back order with Van's for quite a while now, and they have no idea when >they'll be in stock. > >Thanks, >Ed Bundy >ebundy2620(at)aol.com > Hey, Ed: Having seen several exhaust systems Vetterman's is definitly worth waiting for. Why don't you contact him directly: Larry Vetterman: 303-932-0561 snail: 7216 S. Pierce Court Littleton, CO 80123 Michael mikel(at)dimensional.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mikel(at)dimensional.com
Date: Jul 02, 1996
Subject: Re: restrictor fittings
> >>I have a question about this. (Big surprise, huh?) I assume that for a -4 >>fitting you use a -4 rivet. But the rivet head sticks out around the >>perimeter of the flared fitting. Won't that interfere with the sealing of >>the tube? Or does the tube/rivet area "mash" itself to fit? (sounds >>doubtful) >> >>Sigh, >>Ed Bundy OK: here's another method: I used a SMALL piece of brass rod (hobby store) and drilled a 1/16 hole in the middle. I then drilled the aluminum fitting 3/16 and slipped the brass rod in for a nice tight fit. Michael mikel(at)dimensioanl.com RV-4 232 SQ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mikel(at)dimensional.com
Date: Jul 02, 1996
Subject: Re: plexiglass cracks.
>There was a discussion here a few months ago about the repairing of >plexiglass cracks. YIKES!! This is like talking about hemorrhoids: maybe if you don't think about it you won't get them. As I was POPPING on my canopy last week (ok here we go gonna pull another rivet oh please oh please OH! this makes me nervous) I was thinking that I hadn't seen too many repaired canopies in all the RV's I'd seen :>) which means (maybe) it isn't that common a problem. Have many listers had a canopy go bad AFTER installation?? I probably spent too much time polishing the edges and even polishing the holes but seems like time well spent. Course, I fit and filed and refit making sure all the holes had ample clearance and, as things usually go, as I was popping the rivets in, the LAST TWO HOLES to get a rivet needed some enlargement. :>\ Michael mikel(at)dimensional.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Drew" <noeldrew(at)iafrica.com>
Date: Jul 02, 1996
Subject: Jon Johanson
Greeted Jon in Durban, South Africa last night at 10:37 pm at the end of his 12 hour leg across the Indian Ocean. He departed the island of Mauritius at10:30 yesterday morning after being held up by some paper work. He landed with more fuel in his tanks than my standard RV6 can carry and looking as though he had been flying for fun. He will spend a few days flying aroung South Africa before leaving the continent of Africa at Walvis Bay in Namibia en route for Ascension Island and Brazil. He will be in Oshkosh again this year carrying the Australian flag and will deservedly earn the title of the first to fly both ways around the world. And in a RV! We have helped him feed and water his steed which is in excellent condition and will wish him bon voyage tomorrow morning. Noel Drew noeldrew(at)iafrica.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 1996
From: Jerry Springer <jerryflyrv(at)village.yvv.com>
Subject: Re: Exhaust
aol.com!EBundy2620(at)matronics.com wrote: > > Does anyone have any info/opinions on "Snowline" Welding & Fabrication? They > make SS exhaust systems for RV's. > > Apparently these are the ones that ACS sells, and they have an ad in > "Kitplanes". > > I've only heard good things about the Vetterman exhaust, but I've had one on > back order with Van's for quite a while now, and they have no idea when > they'll be in stock. > > Thanks, > Ed Bundy > ebundy2620(at)aol.com Ed Can't you order direct from Larry Vettermen? Thats the way I got mine, maybe things have changed in the last couple of years. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 1996
From: Edward Cole <emcole(at)cris.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: First flight of N36WC
aol.com!WCannon313(at)matronics.com wrote: > > --------------------- > Forwarded message: > Subj: First flight of N36WC > Date: 96-06-30 23:56:23 EDT > From: WCannon313 > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > > Wanted to take a moment to announce the first flight of RV-6 N36WC on 6/29/96 > at Boeing field in Seattle. It was a beautiful 60 degree calm morning, the > taxi testing was done, the FAA man had paid a visit, and I couldn't think of > any reason not to fly the sucker. Everything went exactly as planned and I > orbited the field at about 1500' (under the TCA) for 15 minutes and then > brought it in for a landing, absolutely no problems!! It's now a day later I > have five hours and half a dozen landings and things couldn't be sweeter. The > 0-360 with a constant speed provides great climb performance, I haven't wrung > out the top end yet but I'm sure I'll be pleased. > > Stick with it!!! > > Walt Cannon > N36WC > Seattle, WA.Nice Going Walt! I envy you. Good Luck with the future flights. Ed Cole ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Krahenbuhl, Edward" <krahenbe(at)hono.PREL.hawaii.edu>
Date: Jul 02, 1996
UNSUBSRIBE RV-LIST KRAHENBE(at)PREL.HAWAII.EDU ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 1996
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)ltec.net>
Subject: Re: Navaid Devices
>Bob >Did you hook your push pull rod up to the bottom of the passenger >stick or to the bottom of the pilot stick? I hooked mine up to >the pilot side and this does away with some of the problems of >the fore-aft movement of the controls. I also made a little >opening in the cover that goes over the servo, with a little cover that >goes over this opening so that If I need to get to the clutch for >adjustments I can do so with out takeing it out of the airplane. > >Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS first flight July 14,1989 :-) Jerry, I went from the servo to the co-pilot stick. I can sure see that going to the other side would reduce the throw of the servo to stick push rod. Did you have to enlarge any areas in the seat ribs for clearance of the servo push rod? The cover idea sounds like a great one, also. I'll have to give your idea some thought but am still leaning towards a wing installation. Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)ltec.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 1996
From: Ron Caldwell <74504.1365(at)CompuServe.COM>
Subject: Arlington Fly-In
Are their any plans to hold a RV builders/flyers chat session at Arlington WA? I will be flying my Piper Cherokee from Salt Lake City and would really like to meet and share experiences. I'm the group leader for the Salt Lake RV Builders Group (consisting of 29 builders). My group members are expecting me to bring back lots of RV info and pictures. Ron Caldwell 74504.1365(at)compuserve.com RV6A (Just beginning the Wings) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 1996
From: ammeterj(at)seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re: Arlington Fly-In
>Are their any plans to hold a RV builders/flyers chat session at Arlington WA? >I will be flying my Piper Cherokee from Salt Lake City and would really like to >meet and share experiences. I'm the group leader for the Salt Lake RV Builders >Group (consisting of 29 builders). My group members are expecting me to bring >back lots of RV info and pictures. > >Ron Caldwell >74504.1365(at)compuserve.com >RV6A (Just beginning the Wings) > > > The RV Bunch will be parked in the Southwest area of the field. Stop at our hospitality tent and we'll show you around. Also, we're having a hamburger/salmon BBQ on Saturday afternoon. All RVer's invited; suggested $3.00 donation to help cover costs. John Ammeter ammeterj(at)seanet.com 3233 NE 95th St Seattle WA, 98115 USA RV-6 N16JA Flying 5 years ________________________________________________________________________________
From: jpl(at)showpg.mn.org (Joe Larson)
Subject: Re: Exhaust
Date: Jul 02, 1996
> Can't you order direct from Larry Vettermen? Thats the way I got mine, > maybe things have changed in the last couple of years. I talked to Larry a couple of months ago -- he donated an exhaust system to the Minnesota Wing's builder's forum. At that time, he said that he would continue to handle direct orders, but suggested that Van's would be able to keep them in stock better than he could. -Joe -- Joe Larson jpl(at)showpg.mn.org 612-591-1037 Showpage Software, Inc. http://www.wavefront.com/~showpg 6121 St. Croix Ave. N. Golden Valley, Mn 55422 Future RV-6A pilot. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GHLX34A(at)prodigy.com (MR GEORGE T KILISHEK)
Date: Jul 02, 1996
Subject: Fwd: First flight of N36WC
Walt: Congratulations and best wishes. I know how much effort has gone into this achievement, and I'm very happy for you. George Kilishek ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JamesCone(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 03, 1996
Subject: Re: Exhaust
There is a reason that Vetterman is back ordered. He just makes the best exhaust systems there are. Call Larry: 303-932-0561 and ask him to see if he can move up your delivery date. Jim Cone jamescone(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 1996
From: arnia(at)iav.is (Arni Arnason)
UNSUBSRIBE RV-LIST arnia(at)iav.is ______________________________ | =C1rni =C1rnason | | T=F6lvudeild | / ) =CDslenskir a=F0alverktakar ( \ / /| Keflav=EDkurflugv=F6llur |\ \ _( ( | =CDsland | ) )_ (((\ \| /-) S=EDmi 421-4200 (-\ |/ /))) (\\\\ \_/ / arnia(at)iav.is \ \_/ ////) \ /________________________\ / \ / \ / \___/ F=E6st rabbabar sulta \____/ =ED Noregi? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 1996
From: cn755(at)freenet.carleton.ca (Catherine Lamport)
Subject: CS Prop
Has anyone used a MacCauley B2D 34C211 prop with an O-360 engine in a 6 or 6A. If so, is there a problem with spinner or cowling fit. Also any general comments about this combination are welcome. Thanks! Dale Lamport Nepean, Ontario, Canada cn755(at)freenet.carleton.ca Working on Fuselage of 6A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Cecil Hatfield / Fourstar Printing <cecil(at)alto1.altonet.com>
Date: Jul 02, 1996
Subject: Re: Banquet at Oshkosh
I cleared this with Tom at Van's today. I will arrive an hour early with some signs to reserve space for people from this RV list at the Banquet Sunday evening at Oshkosh. I need to get a feel for how much to reserve. 5 spaces - half a table - two tables or what. It always sells out it seems so I need to be accurate. Soooooooo Please let me know If you plan to attend the Banquet and we can start putting some faces to these names on the list. Thanks, Cecil Hatfield cecil(at)altonet.com (805) 375-2660 Fax;(805) 375-2663 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 1996
From: Royce Craven <roycec(at)ozemail.com.au>
Subject: T. S. Smith
Anyone know anything about an engine supplier call T.S.Smith?? Apparently I need a core 0-320 Anyone know of a cheap core I could buy to supply to this company? Royce Craven royce(at)ozemail.com.au ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6junkie(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 03, 1996
Subject: Oshkosh
I'm a little behind the power curve on this one. I think that I will attend during the first weekend however I have no place to sleep and camping is O.U.T. out. Any suggestions. Gary Corde RV-6 N211GC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6junkie(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 03, 1996
Subject: Re: Fwd: First flight of N36WC
Welcome to the club. Don't even try to wipe that smile off your face...you never seem to loose the RV grin. Best of luck with your new toy. Gary Corde RV-6 N211GC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DMusgrave(at)swri.edu
Date: Jul 03, 1996
Subject: Re: Banquet at Oshkosh
charset=US-ASCII Cecil Hatfield / Fourstar Printing Date: Jul 03, 1996
From: Lewis <lewisjw(at)hqsocom.af.mil>
From: lewisjw
Subject: T.W. Smith Engine Co. T.W. Smith Engine Co. has an excellent reputation. I've been flying one of their rebuilt engines for 10 plus years withou a glitch. Joe lewisjw(at)hqsocom.af.mil ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WStucklen(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 03, 1996
Subject: Re: plexiglass cracks.
<< YIKES!! This is like talking about hemorrhoids: maybe if you don't think about it you won't get them. As I was POPPING on my canopy last week (ok here we go gonna pull another rivet oh please oh please OH! this makes me nervous) I was thinking that I hadn't seen too many repaired canopies in all the RV's I'd seen :>) which means (maybe) it isn't that common a problem. Have many listers had a canopy go bad AFTER installation?? I probably spent too much time polishing the edges and even polishing the holes but seems like time well spent. Course, I fit and filed and refit making sure all the holes had ample clearance and, as things usually go, as I was popping the rivets in, the LAST TWO HOLES to get a rivet needed some enlargement. :>\ Michael mikel(at)dimensional.com >> No cracks in mine! I had the same apprehensions about pop riveting the plexi into place, so I used nuts, screws, & washers instead. Besides, this leaves you a place to attach the apolstery...... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rust47rg(at)one.net
Date: Jul 03, 1996
Subject: Re: Oshkosh
>I'm a little behind the power curve on this one. I think that I will attend >during the first weekend however I have no place to sleep and camping is >O.U.T. out. > >Any suggestions. > >Gary Corde >RV-6 N211GC > Gary: Learn to love camping or start planning for next year.:) Regards: Rusty Gossard N47RG RV-4 Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rust47rg(at)one.net
Date: Jul 03, 1996
Subject: Re: T. S. Smith
> > >Anyone know anything about an engine supplier call T.S.Smith?? >Apparently I need a core 0-320 >Anyone know of a cheap core I could buy to supply to this company? > >Royce Craven >royce(at)ozemail.com.au > Royce: Are you refering to T.W. Smith Engine Co. in Cincinnati. I hangar just down the row from them at Lunken Airport. They have a good reputation around here and have always been a help to me. They stay very busy so that tells me they are doing something right. Everyone I know that is flying behind one of their engines seems to be happy. As far as a core....can't help on that one. Regards: Rusty Gossard N47RG RV-4 Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: EBundy2620(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 03, 1996
Subject: Re: restrictor fittings
<< OK: here's another method: I used a SMALL piece of brass rod (hobby store) and drilled a 1/16 hole in the middle. I then drilled the aluminum fitting 3/16 and slipped the brass rod in for a nice tight fit. >> That sounds promising. However, considering the engine can put out up to 100psi, what keeps the brass rod from being pushed out of the fitting and into the hose? Ed Bundy ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 1996
From: Rod Kimmell <rkimmell(at)teleport.com>
Subject: Oshkosk Accomodations Info
For those still looking for housing at Oshkosh, I suggest you call their housing hotline, 414 235-3007. The hotline has information of private residences and at last check they indicated there is always private homes that have a room or two to rent. Also, check out the web page: http://airspacemag.com/EAA/EAA_Housing.html See you there.. Rod ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 1996
From: Scott Johnson <rvgasj(at)popmail.mcs.net>
Subject: Variprime Warning, Did You Know ...
I talked to one of the chief chemists today at Dupont and I got shocking news. I variprimed the inside of the wing and all my structures thinking I was protecting them from corrosion. Not ! According to Dupont, variprime presents no moisture barrier unlike othe zinc chromate primers. Therefore, if you do not top coat the variprime with a sealer (called Dupont variseal etc.), you have virtually no corrosion protection. Unfortunately, most of the RVers I know didn't. Based on this information, I wished I would have stuck with one of the other zinc chromate primers. Additionally, if you want a real surprise, try taking any magic marker lines that are on top of the variprime off with isopropyl alchol. The variprime will easily rub all off (And that after the variprime had dried for one month)! When I tried that with standard aircraft zinc chromate primer (in spray cans), it did not come off. Hope this helps anybody from making a mistake like I did. Any comments to Scott Johnson rvgasj(at)mcs.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 1996
From: Louis Willig <larywil(at)Op.Net>
Subject: Re: Oshkosh
>I'm a little behind the power curve on this one. I think that I will attend >during the first weekend however I have no place to sleep and camping is >O.U.T. out. > >Any suggestions. > >Gary Corde >RV-6 N211GC > Gary, Call me if you absolutly can not find a place to stay. I have a room in Appleton over the weekend. It has two beds. Louis I Willig Penn Valley, PA (610) 668-4964 P.S. It'll cost a ride in an RV-4 or RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 1996
From: Rion Bourgeois <RION(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: T. S. Smith
> > >Anyone know anything about an engine supplier call T.S.Smith?? >Apparently I need a core 0-320 >Anyone know of a cheap core I could buy to supply to this company? > >Royce Craven >royce(at)ozemail.com.au > > In your dreams, and somebody else just put a deposit on it. Rion. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 1996
From: Frank Smidler <smidler(at)dcwi.com>
Subject: Re: CS Prop
Catherine Lamport wrote: > > Has anyone used a MacCauley B2D 34C211 prop with an O-360 engine > in a 6 or 6A. If so, is there a problem with spinner or cowling > fit. Also any general comments about this combination are > welcome. Thanks! > > Dale Lamport > Nepean, Ontario, Canada > cn755(at)freenet.carleton.ca > Working on Fuselage of 6A John Marshal in Indianapolis has a MacCauley prop on an 0-360 and had to add several bumps onto the cowling to get it to fit. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 1996
From: Frank Smidler <smidler(at)dcwi.com>
Subject: Re: I0-360 in RV-6
HELP..... I have a chance to get a good deal on an IO-360, slant valve, 200 hp engine at a decent price (if there is such a thing). Has anyone out their put one into an RV-6 and what kind of hassels did you have doing it? It is a little wider than an o-360 so will it fit into the cowling? It has the siemies mags, will they interfer with the engine mount? How was your weight and balance? Please don't respond that the RV-6 is not set up for this engine, I know what Van recomends. Would anyone trade me a comparable 180 HP O-360 for it if I did buy it? Frank Smidler N96FS reserved smidler(at)dcwi.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 1996
From: inet(at)intellisys.net (brian whatcott)
Subject: Re: restrictor fittings
> ><< OK: here's another method: I used a SMALL piece of brass rod (hobby store) > and drilled a 1/16 hole in the middle. I then drilled the aluminum fitting > 3/16 and slipped the brass rod in for a nice tight fit. > >> > >That sounds promising. However, considering the engine can put out up to >100psi, what keeps the brass rod from being pushed out of the fitting and >into the hose? > >Ed Bundy > > Sounds like a fair comment. 100 psi on that area amounts to a max force under 3 lbs. Hopefully, the fitting will stop it at a shoulder. brian ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 1996
From: ammeterj(at)seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re: I0-360 in RV-6
>HELP..... > >I have a chance to get a good deal on an IO-360, slant valve, 200 hp >engine at a decent price (if there is such a thing). Has anyone out >their put one into an RV-6 and what kind of hassels did you have doing >it? It is a little wider than an o-360 so will it fit into the cowling? > It has the siemies mags, will they interfer with the engine mount? >How was your weight and balance? > >Please don't respond that the RV-6 is not set up for this engine, I know >what Van recomends. Would anyone trade me a comparable 180 HP O-360 for >it if I did buy it? > >Frank Smidler >N96FS reserved >smidler(at)dcwi.com > > If you can get it at a 'decent' price go for it. If nothing else, you can save it for your RV-8 project. That engine is said to cost about $10,000 more than an O-360 180 HP. I'm sure you won't lose assuming you make a good deal on it. John Ammeter ammeterj(at)seanet.com 3233 NE 95th St Seattle WA, 98115 USA RV-6 N16JA Flying 5 years ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 1996
From: Jerry Springer <jerryflyrv(at)village.yvv.com>
Subject: Re: Variprime Warning, Did You Know ...
Scott Johnson wrote: > > I talked to one of the chief chemists today at Dupont and I got shocking > news. I variprimed the inside of the wing and all my structures thinking I > was protecting them from corrosion. Not ! According to Dupont, variprime > presents no moisture barrier unlike othe zinc chromate primers. Therefore, > if you do not top coat the variprime with a sealer (called Dupont variseal > etc.), you have virtually no corrosion protection. Unfortunately, most of > the RVers I know didn't. Based on this information, I wished I would have > stuck with one of the other zinc chromate primers. Additionally, if you want > a real surprise, try taking any magic marker lines that are on top of the > variprime off with isopropyl alchol. The variprime will easily rub all off > (And that after the variprime had dried for one month)! When I tried that > with standard aircraft zinc chromate primer (in spray cans), it did not come > off. Hope this helps anybody from making a mistake like I did. Any comments > to Scott Johnson rvgasj(at)mcs.com > Scott (damm, the primer thing again) Nonsense!!!! the chemists will tell you anything to sell you more high priced paint. This story has been going around for years. First I assume you are going to seal any primer that is exposed to the outside. When I do a condition inspection on my airplane and take everything apart I see no signs of a corrosion, some of the parts have been primed for nine years, and in the wet Northwest at that. I just hate to see a statement made that each of us that used Variprime made a mistake when it just is not so. Some of the 4130 parts on the inside of my airplane have only Variprime on them and they still show no signs of corrosion or rust. There may be better primers and there may be worse but Veriprime is not a mistake. Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS first flight July 14, 1989 :-) (still no corrosion) P.S. Are you mixing two parts per instructions? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mikel(at)dimensional.com
Date: Jul 03, 1996
Subject: Re: Variprime Warning, Did You Know ...
>I talked to one of the chief chemists today at Dupont and I got shocking >news. I variprimed the inside of the wing and all my structures thinking I >was protecting them from corrosion. Not ! According to Dupont, variprime >presents no moisture barrier unlike othe zinc chromate primers. Therefore, >if you do not top coat the variprime with a sealer (called Dupont variseal >etc.), you have virtually no corrosion protection. Unfortunately, most of >the RVers I know didn't. Based on this information, I wished I would have >stuck with one of the other zinc chromate primers. Additionally, if you want >a real surprise, try taking any magic marker lines that are on top of the >variprime off with isopropyl alchol. The variprime will easily rub all off >(And that after the variprime had dried for one month)! When I tried that >with standard aircraft zinc chromate primer (in spray cans), it did not come >off. Hope this helps anybody from making a mistake like I did. Any comments >to Scott Johnson rvgasj(at)mcs.com > > >Great...my insides are VeriPrime city............ Michael ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 1996
From: ammeterj(at)seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re: restrictor fittings
> ><< OK: here's another method: I used a SMALL piece of brass rod (hobby store) > and drilled a 1/16 hole in the middle. I then drilled the aluminum fitting > 3/16 and slipped the brass rod in for a nice tight fit. > >> > >That sounds promising. However, considering the engine can put out up to >100psi, what keeps the brass rod from being pushed out of the fitting and >into the hose? > >Ed Bundy > > what I did was to thread the fitting for a brass bolt that I had. I then drilled the bolt with a restrictor hole. Tighten the bolt into place and cut off the head; no chance of it working its way free from that. John Ammeter ammeterj(at)seanet.com 3233 NE 95th St Seattle WA, 98115 USA RV-6 N16JA Flying 5 years ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mikel(at)dimensional.com
Date: Jul 03, 1996
Subject: Re: restrictor fittings
> ><< OK: here's another method: I used a SMALL piece of brass rod (hobby store) > and drilled a 1/16 hole in the middle. I then drilled the aluminum fitting > 3/16 and slipped the brass rod in for a nice tight fit. > >> > >That sounds promising. However, considering the engine can put out up to >100psi, what keeps the brass rod from being pushed out of the fitting and >into the hose? > >Ed Bundy The fact that the flaired end hole and the brass rod is now a little bit bigger than the fitting it is being fit into!!! "No room!! No room!!" The Mad Hatter Michael > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 1996
From: DMCooke <dmcooke(at)rand.nidlink.com>
Subject: Re: Variprime Warning, Did You Know ...
Scott Johnson wrote: According to Dupont, variprime > presents no moisture barrier unlike othe zinc chromate primers. Therefore, > if you do not top coat the variprime with a sealer (called Dupont variseal > etc.), you have virtually no corrosion protection. Hey Scott, I used Variprime on the main spar and am using Marhyde on the rest of the riveted interfaces. I wonder if the same "no moisture barrier" property also applies to Marhyde. Probably the best thing to do is construct the airplane, paint the outside so that it is pretty and fog the interior every couple of years if you are worried about moisture and corrosion. Some Cessna 150s have been flying for forty years with no interior protection at all. I have seen some of these old planes with no sign of corrosion and I have seen some later models with lots of corrosion. I believe it all depends on how you maintain your airplane and the environment in which you normaly operate the craft. So, for many of us, there is probably no need to do the interior priming. (Except for the cabin. It must be pretty of course.) :-) Happy 4th. Have a blast. Dave Cooke dmcooke(at)rand.nidlink.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: TMRV6(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 04, 1996
Subject: Re: restrictor fittings
OK here's another way to restrict oil /fuel pressure sender hoses. Use a steel AN fitting, solder the hole shut and drill to whatever size you choose. Todd ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 1996
From: sburch(at)norfolk.infi.net (stan burchett)
Subject: TOOLS WANTED
I'm starting a -6A fuse, in a partnership. Need mostly good used hand tools.. Pneumatic with regulator, swivel fitting, squeezer with heads, paint gun, drill, and rt.angle attachment. 3/16 and 1/8 cleco fasteners and pliers, R and L snips, spacer fan, dimpler, straight, flush and offset rivet sets, bucking bars, back plate, straight edge, drilled deburrers and any other appropriate goodies, including new drill bit#s 41,40,40 long, 30,30 long,12,3/16 and 1/4. Also a bench model band saw. If you have any or all, that are looking for a good home..please send list and prices > my email or 757-867-7244. Thank you. Stan from Yorktown VA ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 1996
From: Dennis Trusty <dtrusty(at)flash.net>
Subject: RV-6 Empennage and Wing Kit For Sale
I have a completed empennage kit(needs mass balancing), and a wing kit with both spars built. One leading edge and fuel tank(not sealed) are completed and the top skins are drilled, deburred and dimpled for one wing. Project includes a steel wing jig. $4300. I haven't quit. Have purchased a complete kit with lot's more done. Will be in Oshkosh a year+ sooner. Dennis Trusty PS Visit the home page for EAA 983, Granbury,TX at http://www.flash.net/~dtrusty/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 1996
From: "Derrick L. Aubuchon" <n184da(at)cctrap.com>
Subject: Cripming question
Hello fellow RV'ers..... Question for the group: How does everyone crimp #2 & #8 terminals without spending several hundred $$$$ for a special tool?? A friend of mine made a "crimper" thats works in his bench-vise.....but I was curious to see how others tackled this detail. Thanks in advance.... Derrick L. Aubuchon RV4 N184DA... in its seemingly endless finishing stages!!! n184da(at)cctrap.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 1996
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)ltec.net>
Subject: Re: Cripming question
>How does everyone crimp #2 & #8 terminals without spending several >hundred $$$$ for a special tool?? >A friend of mine made a "crimper" thats works in his bench-vise.....but >I was curious to see how others tackled this detail. >Derrick L. Aubuchon Derrick, I have a friend that works for REA (rural electric). I cut, stripped the insulation and indexed the terminal to the wire and took everything over to his house. He had an assortment of crimping tools and we found one that worked. You might also try electrical supply houses. I imagine you could find someone who would be glad to crimp the terminals if you brought the wire & terminals to their place of business. Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)ltec.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 1996
From: John Darby <johnd@our-town.com>
Subject: Re: Cripming question
Derrick; I've seen it done with a flare tool. The type that is two bars with the insides a half of the flare for a tube. They are usually formed with ridges inside of it. Place these in the vice and crank down on it. Seems to work. I did some and they were ok. Eventually, some one was here with one of those high dollar tools and we redid them. John D John Darby RV6 N61764 flying johnd@our-town.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 1996
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: Re: Variprime Warning, Did You Know ...
Scott: Unless you are planning on dunking your plane in the ocean (or isopropyl alcohol) and then leaving it tied down for a year I really doubt you'll ever have to worry about corrosion. We RVers seem to have a particular thing about primers (I include myself), and have a tendency to forget how many 30 and 40 year old Spam Cans there are out there, many of which have spent years tied down on the ramp, and are still going strong with no primer at all on the interior. Randall Henderson randall(at)edt.com RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: EBundy2620(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 04, 1996
Subject: Re: T. S. Smith
< Anyone know anything about an engine supplier call T.S.Smith?? >Apparently I need a core 0-320 >Anyone know of a cheap core I could buy to supply to this company? > Good luck with the core. I spent about 6 months looking for a runout to rebuild and couldn't find anything that was complete for less than $5500. Add approximately $10k to that for a "real" (i.e. total) rebuild and the new Lyc's from Van's made a lot of sense. -- Ed Bundy ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 1996
From: csanchez(at)world.std.com (Cheryl Sanchez)
Subject: Exhaust for sale
I noticed that some builders are waiting for exhaust systems. I have a Larry Vetterman exhaust for sale. It is stainless. It is the crossover style for an O-320 6A. I have the nuts washers and gaskets that Larry provides, even the instructions. It has never been used. This exhaust came from the 6A project I bought. I removed the 320 and put on a 360. I will sell it for $500 and I pay the shipping. Cheryl Sanchez csanchez(at)world.std.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 1996
From: Boris Robinson <smbr(at)inetw.net>
Subject: wing closure - final riveting
I am almost finished riveting the top skins on the wing, which I've done first using the long back rivet set. I will close the wings soon, riveting on the bottom skins. Doing a procedure test with clecos I found that there's a lot force and bending required of the skin in order to buck some of the rivets. I'm worried about deforming the skin. My question is: Considering that the bottom of the rear spar flange points forward, what is a good procedure to follow? 1. Rivet aft to front (and root to tip) which will give me more room through the larger forward lightening holes to reach the final rivets in each bay? Or, ??? Thanks in advance. Boris Robinson smbr(at)inetw.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 1996
From: ammeterj(at)seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re: Cripming question
>Derrick; >I've seen it done with a flare tool. The type that is two bars with the >insides a half of the flare for a tube. They are usually formed with ridges >inside of it. Place these in the vice and crank down on it. Seems to work. >I did some and they were ok. Eventually, some one was here with one of those >high dollar tools and we redid them. >John D >John Darby RV6 N61764 flying >johnd@our-town.com > > > That's a good solution, too. Gives me another idea; how about using the crimping tool normally used for stainless steel aircraft cable. You'd have to use one of the larger sizes but it should work perfectly. John Ammeter ammeterj(at)seanet.com 3233 NE 95th St Seattle WA, 98115 USA RV-6 N16JA Flying 5 years ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 1996
From: ammeterj(at)seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re: Cripming question
>Hello fellow RV'ers..... > >Question for the group: > >How does everyone crimp #2 & #8 terminals without spending several >hundred $$$$ for a special tool?? >A friend of mine made a "crimper" thats works in his bench-vise.....but >I was curious to see how others tackled this detail. > >Thanks in advance.... > >Derrick L. Aubuchon > >RV4 N184DA... in its seemingly endless finishing stages!!! > >n184da(at)cctrap.com > > My biggest problem was finding a tool small enough to crimp #2 and #8 terminals. Actually wasn't quite that bad; I just put a large drill bit inside my Triplex crimpers. Triplex, for those not in the electrical trade, is the wire (usually three wires together) that hang from the pole to your house and provide the power to run your air compressors and other essential items. Sometimes it does help to be in the Electrical Utility business. Your buddy who made a crimper for use in his vise had the right idea. You need to not only crimp the connector but also swage the copper wires inside the connector. They must be 'one' with each other. That takes a _lot_ of pressure. The crimper we use for triplex has a handle about 20 inches long and it take a fair amount of muscle to operate. I know some advise against soldering connectors but I soldered the connectors after crimping them. To avoid having the wire break at the solder joint I used a heavy duty heat shrink sleeve around the connector and extending back onto the wire about 3/4". This stops the wire from flexing and breaking at the solder joint. The heat shrink that I used is much thicker than normal and may not be available in the normal outlets. I also use it for my wrench handles. This is what I did. Don't know if it helps you any but maybe it'll give you or someelse ideas. John Ammeter ammeterj(at)seanet.com 3233 NE 95th St Seattle WA, 98115 USA RV-6 N16JA Flying 5 years ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 1996
From: ammeterj(at)seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re: wing closure - final riveting
>I am almost finished riveting the top skins on the wing, which I've done >first using the long back rivet set. I will close the wings soon, riveting >on the bottom skins. Doing a procedure test with clecos I found that there's >a lot force and bending required of the skin in order to buck some of the >rivets. I'm worried about deforming the skin. > >My question is: Considering that the bottom of the rear spar flange points >forward, what is a good procedure to follow? > >1. Rivet aft to front (and root to tip) which will give me more room through >the larger forward lightening holes to reach the final rivets in each bay? > >Or, ??? > >Thanks in advance. > >Boris Robinson >smbr(at)inetw.net > > I've included an article from the 'Best of Puget Sound RVators' that kind of addresses this issue. As far as deforming the skin, I was surprised at how far you can bend the skin without causing any harm. Boris used the 'back rivet' method but I can't see how that can be done on the bottom skin after the top skin is in place. Of course, that is why we do the top skin first. It's only our snoopy friends that check the bottom of the wing for mistakes. My biggest and most obvious 'boo-boo' in on the top of the wing but since they all look on the bottom they never notice it. :-) DO YOU WANT A WING WITHOUT ANY POP RIVETS? by Jim Morgan Puget Sound RVators I had been thinking how to rivet the main skins on without using any pop rivets. John Ammeter and I talked about this on several occasions and had heard of someone who had put in the root ribs last after the skins have been riveted in place. This allows you to use driven rivets on each of the root ribs. The way to do this is to first rivet in place all the ribs with flanges facing toward the wingtip. Make sure that the rivets on the bottom side of the rear spar where the aileron goes are flush rivets so that the aileron gap seal can be riveted in. Do not rivet in the root ribs that are facing inboard at this time but go ahead and drill and cleco them for later installation of rivets and bolts. After you have drilled, deburred, and dimpled the skins and ribs, and done all the other things you need to do before you rivet the main skins on, check it again; this is your last chance before closing. When riveting on the main skins the thing to remember is not to rivet the skins to the root ribs that face inboard. Now you can take out the inboard ribs one at a time; this may take a little doing as it is a tight fit. Leave in place the rib next to the first outboard facing rib. With these ribs removed you have the room to reach in and buck the root ribs one at a time. Be careful to watch the sequence of rivets; don't leave any rivets out because you won't be able to buck them once the next rib is installed. With care you will have a wing without any pop rivets even in the wing root area. John Ammeter ammeterj(at)seanet.com 3233 NE 95th St Seattle WA, 98115 USA RV-6 N16JA Flying 5 years ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 1996
From: wbpace(at)adnc.com (Bill Pace)
Subject: Parts Is Parts
Parts Is Parts: I've been inventoring my wing kit. Van's has this bad habit of labeling the small parts "Bag nnn" without explaining what's in the bag. Now that's no problem with most things such as rivets, bolts and the like, but how the heck am I supposed to know what some of these items are? For example, what the heck are those cone shaped things? And what are those small squares of sheet metal for in one of the bags? I _assume_ that they are for the aileron doubler plates, but I don't _like_ to assume anything! I can deal with just taking it on faith that the bagged stuff is complete (if I have an even number of items, that's a good sign) but I want to label them in my storage cabinet accurately. I hate to guess and end up using the wrong item, or worse, end up with extra hardware and wonder if I missed something. Is there a standard reference around that will help me out - preferably with pictures or drawings? Are you listening Van's? It would surely be nice if you were a little more detailed in the pick list on some of these more esoteric items. Aging Rivets: On a related matter, I have heard that rivets will age over time and that "fresh" rivets are best. I'm on the slow-build plan - it has taken me 18 months to finish up the empennage kit due to other commitments in my life. So should I avoid mixing my leftover empennage rivets with the new wing hardware or is this short enough a period for it not to matter. At the rate I'm going, I figure it will take 2-3 years to build the wings so this might be a real issue if I try to use a 4 year old rivet near the end. ----- Bill Pace The only expensive tool wbpace(at)adnc.com is a cheap tool. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 1996
From: Dennis Trusty <dtrusty(at)flash.net>
Subject: List of RV-list members and email addresses
How would I obtain a list of all members and there email addresses. Dennis ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 1996
From: ammeterj(at)seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re: List of RV-list members and email addresses
>How would I obtain a list of all members and there email addresses. > >Dennis > > > Why, do you want to send us a Christmas Card?? I'm not trying to be argumentative but I already get unwanted advertisements, etc. I find that I can get all the email return addresses I want or need by following the List email exchanges. If I want to make a mailing to all members I just send a message to the RV-list; if I want to send a message to Elon or Bob Skinner I send them a message privately. John Ammeter ammeterj(at)seanet.com 3233 NE 95th St Seattle WA, 98115 USA RV-6 N16JA Flying 5 years ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 1996
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: Re: Parts Is Parts
You should have a list of what's in each bag. Even with that it can be a bit difficult to figure out WHICH thing in bag XXX is the widget and which is the gizmo, but by using the process of elimination (I know THAT'S a widget, so the other thing must be a gizmo) I've been able to figure it all out through the fuselage kit. If you don't have this piece of paper (it's not the pick list, it's a separate one) call Van's and get it. Randall Henderson randall(at)edt.com RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: frankv(at)pec.co.nz
Date: Jul 05, 1996
Subject: Re: Aging rivets: was Re: Parts Is Parts
>Aging Rivets: >On a related matter, I have heard that rivets will age over time and >that "fresh" rivets are best. I'm on the slow-build plan - it has >taken me 18 months to finish up the empennage kit due to other >commitments in my life. So should I avoid mixing my leftover >empennage rivets with the new wing hardware or is this short enough a >period for it not to matter. At the rate I'm going, I figure it will >take 2-3 years to build the wings so this might be a real issue if I >try to use a 4 year old rivet near the end. Keep 'em in your freezer, according to an ex-RAF engineer I know. He reckoned that otherwise they should be used within 3 months. [How long do they stay on Van's shelf, I wonder?] If they have hardened (I think that's the potential problem), you can heat (not sure how hot) then dunk them in cold water to freshen them up again. As you can see, I'm not sure of the details, but I trust him enough to keep all my rivets in the freezer until I need them. I haven't felt the need to heat'n'cool them yet. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- frankv(at)pec.co.nz | "Knowledge=Power=Energy=Matter=Mass; Frank van der Hulst | A good bookshop is just a genteel Software Engineer | Black Hole that knows how to read". PEC(NZ) Ltd (Cardax), Marton | Terry Pratchett, "Guards! Guards!" http://www.pec.co.nz/~frankv/ | -------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 1996
From: Fred Hiatt <hiatt001(at)gold.tc.umn.edu>
Subject: Re: Parts Is Parts
Bill Pace wrote: > > Parts Is Parts: > > I've been inventoring my wing kit. Van's has this bad habit of labeling > the small parts "Bag nnn" without explaining what's in the bag. Now that's > no problem with most things such as rivets, bolts and the like, but how the > heck am I supposed to know what some of these items are? For example, what > the heck are those cone shaped things? And what are those small squares of > sheet metal for in one of the bags? I _assume_ that they are for the > aileron doubler plates, but I don't _like_ to assume anything! > > I can deal with just taking it on faith that the bagged stuff is complete > (if I have an even number of items, that's a good sign) but I want to label > them in my storage cabinet accurately. I hate to guess and end up using the > wrong item, or worse, end up with extra hardware and wonder if I missed > something. Is there a standard reference around that will help me out - > preferably with pictures or drawings? > > Are you listening Van's? It would surely be nice if you were a little more > detailed in the pick list on some of these more esoteric items. > > Aging Rivets: > > On a related matter, I have heard that rivets will age over time and that > "fresh" rivets are best. I'm on the slow-build plan - it has taken me 18 > months to finish up the empennage kit due to other commitments in my life. > So should I avoid mixing my leftover empennage rivets with the new wing > hardware or is this short enough a period for it not to matter. At the > rate I'm going, I figure it will take 2-3 years to build the wings so this > might be a real issue if I try to use a 4 year old rivet near the end. > > ----- > Bill Pace The only expensive tool > wbpace(at)adnc.com is a cheap tool. Bill, Somehow when I opened up the paperwork on my wing kit I found a complete list of all of Van's bags with the contents identified. If you would like a copy of this list, send me your address or FAX number and I will send you a copy. Fred, hiatt001(at)gold.tc.umn.edu ________________________________________________________________________________
From: jpl(at)showpg.mn.org (Joe Larson)
Subject: Re: Variprime Warning, Did You Know ...
Date: Jul 04, 1996
> >I talked to one of the chief chemists today at Dupont and I got shocking > >news. I variprimed the inside of the wing and all my structures thinking I > >was protecting them from corrosion. Not ! According to Dupont, variprime > >presents no moisture barrier unlike othe zinc chromate primers. > >Great...my insides are VeriPrime city............ > > Michael Yeah. Wouldn't you know -- I sprayed my wing spars just last night! -J -- Joe Larson jpl(at)showpg.mn.org 612-591-1037 Showpage Software, Inc. http://www.wavefront.com/~showpg 6121 St. Croix Ave. N. Golden Valley, Mn 55422 Future RV-6A pilot. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gregory Young" <gyoung(at)Net1.Net>
Subject: Re: Parts Is Parts
Date: Jul 04, 1996
I got a 3-4 page list in both the empenage and wing kits that listed the contents of every bag for all kits. It's not in fromt of me but I think it had prices for each bag. Search your paperwork and call Van's if it's not there. BTW I think the cone things you're referring to are the aileron push tube ends. -- Greg Young gyoung(at)net1.net Citabria N90AV RV-6 s/n 23070 - starting wings - ribs, ribs, ribs ---------- > From: Bill Pace <adnc.com!wbpace(at)matronics.com> > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV-List: Parts Is Parts > Date: Thursday, 1996 July, 04 16:14 PM > > Parts Is Parts: > > I've been inventoring my wing kit. Van's has this bad habit of labeling > the small parts "Bag nnn" without explaining what's in the bag. Now that's > no problem with most things such as rivets, bolts and the like, but how the > heck am I supposed to know what some of these items are? For example, what > the heck are those cone shaped things? And what are those small squares of > sheet metal for in one of the bags? I _assume_ that they are for the > aileron doubler plates, but I don't _like_ to assume anything! > > I can deal with just taking it on faith that the bagged stuff is complete > (if I have an even number of items, that's a good sign) but I want to label > them in my storage cabinet accurately. I hate to guess and end up using the > wrong item, or worse, end up with extra hardware and wonder if I missed > something. Is there a standard reference around that will help me out - > preferably with pictures or drawings? > > Are you listening Van's? It would surely be nice if you were a little more > detailed in the pick list on some of these more esoteric items. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: EBundy2620(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 04, 1996
Subject: Re: Cripming question
<< How does everyone crimp #2 & #8 terminals without spending several hundred $$$$ for a special tool?? A friend of mine made a "crimper" thats works in his bench-vise.....but I was curious to see how others tackled this detail. >> I'm working on that right now myself. I did the #8's myself with the #10 crimper on my crimp tool. Worked fine. I made up all of the #2 cables and taped the ends in place and took them to my local friendly FBO. They did them for free. Of course I DO hangar and buy gas from them... I think most places that do any major repair will have a crimp tool. -- Ed Bundy ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JRoss10612(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 05, 1996
Subject: Re: Variprime Warning, Did You Know ...
Zinc Chromate works by exchanging ions as the paint ages. As a result, Zinc Chromate has a life span that can be limited, due to the conditions of exposure. Veriprime does not have this limitation, and it is a self etching primer with good adhesion. Perhaps it has limited moisture barrier capabilities, I don't know. But there are spec sheets for the stuff. Two part epoxy primer will have excellent moisture barrier specs, but it is fussy to use, more expensive and probably requires more surface preparation. And I'm sure the adhesion qualities are directly related to the surface preparation. I'm sure Van's has considered all the above befor recommending Dupont Veriprime. I'm interested in other folks input on this topic. Jon Ross RV-8 on Long Island ________________________________________________________________________________
From: John Kimmel <blpzx(at)pacifier.com>
Subject: Instrument Panel Connundrum
Date: Jul 04, 1996
I have run into a real poser as I examine the three different versions = of the instrument panel included in my RV-3 kit: Version #1: The drawing on the print measures 9.5" top to bottom-- a = measurement consistent with other dimensions on the drawing which I know = to be correct. Version #2: The value listed on the drawing for the above dimension is = 8.5"--, a result I find consistent in that there are several other = incorrect dimensions on the same contour. Version #3: The instrument panel blank included in the kit has an = outline traced on it which measures 10.5" top to bottom. Obviously, version #3 is the one most kit builders are going to go with, = but I'd like confirmation. I don't have a finished RV-3 handy, or I'd = measure it directly. Any comments? Is there anyone else out there = building a sliding canopy RV-3? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 1996
From: Leo Davies <leo(at)icn.su.OZ.AU>
Subject: Re: Cripming question
The right crimping tool usually makes a more reliable connection than kluged setups, try and borrow the tool. ld >Derrick; >I've seen it done with a flare tool. The type that is two bars with the >insides a half of the flare for a tube. They are usually formed with ridges >inside of it. Place these in the vice and crank down on it. Seems to work. >I did some and they were ok. Eventually, some one was here with one of those >high dollar tools and we redid them. >John D >John Darby RV6 N61764 flying >johnd@our-town.com > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 1996
From: Steve Mayer <72652.670(at)CompuServe.COM>
Subject: Re: Aging rivets: was Re: Parts Is Parts
Just received the latest "16 years of Rvator" book from VANS the other day and found an article on page 11 where Van says that rivets don't harden signifigantly in a 5-10 yr timeframe. I guess that if you had freezer room it wouldn't hurt, but if one buys a kit at a time, rivets shouldn't harden in our building timeframe. There are plenty of things to worry about while building an RV, but that's not one of them, IMHO. Steve RV-4 emp (year 1 of my personal 10 year plan) ----- Forwarded Message ----- >TO: [unknown], INTERNET:RV-LIST(at)MATRONICS.COM >FROM: INTERNET:frankv(at)pec.co.nz, INTERNET:frankv(at)pec.co.nz >DATE: 7/4/96, 9:32 PM > >Re: RV-List: Aging rivets: was Re: Parts Is Parts >>Aging Rivets: >>On a related matter, I have heard that rivets will age over time and >>that "fresh" rivets are best. I'm on the slow-build plan - it has >>taken me 18 months to finish up the empennage kit due to other >>commitments in my life. So should I avoid mixing my leftover >>empennage rivets with the new wing hardware or is this short enough a >>period for it not to matter. At the rate I'm going, I figure it will >>take 2-3 years to build the wings so this might be a real issue if I >>try to use a 4 year old rivet near the end. >Keep 'em in your freezer, according to an ex-RAF engineer I know. He >reckoned that otherwise they should be used within 3 months. [How long >do they stay on Van's shelf, I wonder?] >If they have hardened (I think that's the potential problem), you can >heat (not sure how hot) then dunk them in cold water to freshen them >up again. As you can see, I'm not sure of the details, but I trust him >enough to keep all my rivets in the freezer until I need them. I >haven't felt the need to heat'n'cool them yet. -- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 1996
From: Harold Sutphin <hsutphin(at)magicnet.net>
Subject: Re: Crimping question
A good trick and easy to use - try crushing in a vise with a bolt proportionate to the terminal you are using, for example try a 3/16" bolt to crimp a number 4 terminal. Put the wire and terminal in a vise and squeeze with the bolt positioned (not the threaded part) on top of the terminal sleeve. When you crush, the wires should all get bunched up together (good contact) and "spread" (good mechanical bond) a little where they come out of the sleeve. The bolt leaves a slightly rounded indentation as a crimper might. The result is the same as if you crimped. Try a pull test if you aren't sure. Harold RV-6A > > The right crimping tool usually makes a more reliable connection than kluged > setups, try and borrow the tool. > > >Derrick; > >I've seen it done with a flare tool. The type that is two bars with the > >insides a half of the flare for a tube. They are usually formed with ridges > >inside of it. Place these in the vice and crank down on it. Seems to work. > >I did some and they were ok. Eventually, some one was here with one of those > >high dollar tools and we redid them. > >John D > >John Darby RV6 N61764 flying > >johnd@our-town.com > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 1996
From: Royce Craven <roycec(at)ozemail.com.au>
Subject: Re: wing closure - final riveting
John, This is the method hat I intended to use. (I stole it from F.J.) What I am worring about is that I built the rear spar before I read the excellent Justice manual (Thanks F.J. if you're out there) and riveted the area where the root ribs go with the shop head on the inside. I riveted the top skins on and can get the root ribs out at the moment, but as I rivet the skins I assume the rear spar will get harder to push down. Should I just rivet the ribs in place before I start the lower skin and live with the pop rivets. I would prefer not to. Any views from thoes in the know? Royce Craven roycec(at)ozemail.com.au > >I've included an article from the 'Best of Puget Sound RVators' that kind of ........ > >DO YOU WANT A WING WITHOUT ANY POP RIVETS? >by Jim Morgan >Puget Sound RVators > ........... can be riveted in. Do not rivet in the root ribs that are facing >inboard at this time but go ahead and drill and cleco them for later >installation of rivets and bolts. ............. > >John Ammeter >ammeterj(at)seanet.com >3233 NE 95th St >Seattle WA, 98115 USA >RV-6 N16JA >Flying 5 years > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 1996
From: spjohnsn(at)ix.netcom.com (Stephen Paul Johnson)
Subject: Re: Variprime Warning, Did You Know ...
>I'm sure Van's has considered all the above befor recommending Dupont >Veriprime. I'm interested in other folks input on this topic. > >Jon Ross RV-8 on Long Island > I just got out my data sheet on Sherwin Williams wash primer P60 G2 which I understand is used by Van's. To quote: ___________________________________________________________________ Advantages: Promotes Excellent adhesion Serves as a tie coat over non-ferrous metals, ferrous metals and zinc coated steel P60 G2 is an excelent primer for many enamel topcoats such as (list follows) Non-photochemically reactive when reduced 150% with reducer R7 K 44. ____________________________________________________________________ Notice no claims are made regarding corrosion protection, for what it's worth. Steve Johnson RV-8 spjohnsn(at)ix.netcom.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 1996
From: joehine(at)mi.net (joehine)
Subject: Re: July 4th
Thought I would just take a moment to wish all in the USA a happy forth of July. After our close call with the Quebec vote in October it seems we canadians are finally starting to learn that a little patriotism is a good thing. I saw more flags here on our July 1st holiday than I have seen in years. Anyway, happy forth to all, and I hope you all have a happy, safe weekend. Joe joehine(at)mi.net Comp. 9, Site 8, RR#4 506-452-1072 Home Fredericton, NB 506-452-3495 Work Canada, E3B 4X5 Nobody on their death bed has ever been heard to say "Geeze,I wish I'd spent more time at work" ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 1996
From: joehine(at)mi.net (joehine)
Subject: Re: wing closure - final riveting
>John, > This is the method hat I intended to use. (I stole it from F.J.) >What I am worring about is that I built the rear spar before I read the >excellent Justice manual (Thanks F.J. if you're out there) and riveted the >area where the root ribs go with the shop head on the inside. >I riveted the top skins on and can get the root ribs out at the moment, but >as I rivet the skins I assume the rear spar will get harder to push down. >Should I just rivet the ribs in place before I start the lower skin and live >with the pop rivets. >I would prefer not to. > >Any views from thoes in the know? > > >Royce Craven >roycec(at)ozemail.com.au Listers, On my four wings I managed to get all of the root ribs rivited on without using pop rivits at all. With difficulty and using a 10 year old with small hand and arms as your bucking partner for the last few rivits toward the trailing edge of the wing, it is possible to do this. If the price is right I have an experianced now 12 year old I will rent out for this job. You must pay the shipping and up keep while you have him. :) cheers Joe joehine(at)mi.net Comp. 9, Site 8, RR#4 506-452-1072 Home Fredericton, NB 506-452-3495 Work Canada, E3B 4X5 Nobody on their death bed has ever been heard to say "Geeze,I wish I'd spent more time at work" ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rvbildr(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 05, 1996
Subject: Re: Parts Is Parts
Try using some of Frank Justice's instructions. He specifies many times in his version which bag the goodies are in. His instructions are more complete and detailed than Van's. I try to combine his, Vans and Orndorff's and I still screw up..... Mal rvbildr(at)juno.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 1996
From: Dan Boudro <dboudro(at)nmia.com>
Subject: Re: wing closure - final riveting
Joe, If you've got a 10 year old that you could teach to buck you must be doing something right. My hat is off to you. Dan Boudro RV-4 N9167Z Albuquerque, NM dboudro(at)nmia.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 1996
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: Re: Crimping question
> > The right crimping tool usually makes a more reliable connection than kluged > setups, try and borrow the tool. > I concur. Case in point: Ken Scott recently installed an electronic ignition on his RV-6 (read about it in the last RVator) and had to mess around a lot before he got all the kinks out. Most of the problems were related to poor crimp connections. Really intermittent, un-fun problems to try to track down. Perhaps if you have a local builders group, or know several RV builders in your area, you could go in on a good crimp tool or two. Come to think of it, that would work well for OUR group -- I might bring that up at the next meeting.... Another candidate for "group purchase" low-use/high expense tool would be a 37 degree flaring tool for those fuel lines.... Randall Henderson, RV-6 Editor, Home Wing Newsletter http://www.edt.com/homewing randall(at)edt.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 1996
From: Scott Johnson <rvgasj(at)popmail.mcs.net>
Subject: Paint Advise Needed ...
I am using Randolph Aircraft Acrylic Laquer to paint my airplane. I have used it many times spraying Piper Cherokees and have had good results. But I always sprayed over the pre-existing Acrylic Laquer. Randolph Acrylic Laquer was used on Pipers almost 20 years. Heres my problem. I purchased the companies Epibond epoxy primer that they say you can use with their Acrylic Laquer. We first coated the alumipreped and alodined aluminum with this Randolph epoxy primer. We let it sit two days as recommended, and then sprayed with the Randolph acrylic laquer. The results were terrible ! We got a significant orange peel. To make sure it wasnt the gun settings, we sprayed bare aluminum and got perfect results with the laquer. I called the chief chemist at Randolph and talked to the president of Randolph paints and they gave me many suggestions which we tried with the same results. I am so frustrated it is unbelievable. So we bought aircraft stripper to take off the paint and the primer, and the primer won't come all off. The president of Randolph aircraft paints has been unwilling to give me an compensation even for the paint. Since I have already bought the acrylic laquer I am contemplating doing the following. 1.) Strip off as much primer as I can with aircraft stripper. 2.) Spray with Dupont Variprime. 3.) Top coat the Variprime with Dupont Variseal (spelling ?) 4.) Then spray the Randolph acrylic laquer. If anybody can give me recommendations on what to do I would greatly appreciate it. I certainly think Randolph support in standing behind their products at this point is terrible. If they were in this state, I would be filling out a small claims suit at this moment. When I called Dupont, they said you can't use an epoxy primer with acrylic laquer. Why does Randolph paints say you can ? (Yet both the chemist and president at Randolph say you can.) So frustrated and mad I could ... Scott Johnson rvgasj(at)mcs.com P.S. Any good information will be rewarded with a free dinner when we meet at Oshkosh !!!!! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 1996
From: Russ Werner <russ(at)maui.net>
Subject: Citabria dual in SEA area
Anyone know where I might be able to get some dual in a Citabria in the SEA area? I'll be on a layover there next week and need a checkout before I can fly my new plane! Reply to my email address rather than the list. Thanks, Russ Werner, Maui Hawaii russ(at)maui.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: SportAV8R(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 05, 1996
Subject: Re: wing closure - final riveting
I honestly don't remember the sequence I used to close my wings, bnut I followed the Orndorff tapes and with very few contortions and virtually no assistant time was able to close both wings with zero pop rivets anywhere, top or bottom. I later had to drill one rivet out that I wasn't happy with, and had to replace it with a pop rivet, so there is definitely a critical order to follow. George and Becki will usually steer you the best way; so I recommend the tapes for guidance. I've since sold mine so I can't refer back and tell you the sequence. Bill Boyd Enameling the Instrument Panel ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Cecil Hatfield / Fourstar Printing <cecil(at)alto1.altonet.com>
Date: Jul 05, 1996
Subject: Re: wing closure - final riveting
John, Last January while in Bakersfield talking with the RV family there, I was told they solved that problem by making a special bucking bar. At the time they drew it out for me but I didn't keep the sketch. If you haven't done the top skins yet, another way is to do the top skin last and hide the pop rivets with the black 'wing walk' material. I'm at this point myself and still haven't decided which way to go. (I just today, finished the tanks). I'm going to look hard at Oshkosh in a few weeks before I decide. At Oshkosh, I'm also going to be looking at 'canopie fits' and try to make up my mind about tip-up vs. sliding. >.I riveted the top skins on and can get the root ribs out at the moment, >but >as I rivet the skins I assume the rear spar will get harder to push down. >Should I just rivet the ribs in place before I start the lower skin and >live >with the pop rivets. >I would prefer not to. >Any views from thoes in the know? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 1996
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: 1996 Northwest RV Fly-In
Just wanted to report that the 1996 Northwest RV Fly-In was a BIG success. 64 RVs flew in including Van and crew, the weather was great, we gave some Young Eagle rides, had some good food, and generally had a fun time all around. Check out the "Home Wing Home Page" (http://www.edt.com/homewing) for a complete report, including pictures. Randall Henderson Editor, Home Wing Newsletter http://www.edt.com/homewing randall(at)edt.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: NAEK31A(at)prodigy.com ( KURT L KEILBACH)
Date: Jul 05, 1996
Subject: rv 6 crash / Boulder , CO.
Did anyone catch the news last Sunday ( CNN ) . A glider turned to avoid a couple of airplanes and ended up hitting the prop of yet another plane . The glider landed safely but the plane crashed upside down . They showed a closeup which confirmed it was a 6 or 6a . Does anyone have any knowledge of this ? Thanks , Kurt Keilbach naek31a(at)prodigy.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 1996
From: Hal & Suzanne Smith <smithhm(at)phoenix.net>
Subject: Re: RV-6 Empennage and Wing Kit For Sale
Dennis Trusty wrote: > > I have a completed empennage kit(needs mass balancing), and a wing I would be interested in your empennage if you are interested in selling it separately. What is your asking price for just that part. I live in Bellville, Tx., just outside of Houston. Please reply to my e-mail address: Hal Smith smithhm(at)phoenix.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 1996
From: "Derrick L. Aubuchon" <n184da(at)cctrap.com>
Subject: Gyros
First... Thanks to all for the responses to my crimping question. Next topic....GYROS. Is there much difference between Sigma-tek vs RC Allen?? The price difference is not that large...and in fact, with the info that I have, AS&S charges more for the RC Allen than the Sigma-Tek...whereas Chief prices them the other way around. So I don't believe I should choose based upon cost alone. Does anyone have specific preferences??? Good/bad experiences with either?? Geeezzz...sooo many decisions....whats a builder to do Thanks again in advance, RV4 N184DA...STILL in its finishing phase -- Derrick L. Aubuchon n184da(at)cctrap.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: David Kerzie <dckerzie(at)qnet.com>
Subject: Elevator Control horn - Hole Location
Date: Jul 05, 1996
We are in the process of installing the aft elevator push rod in our = RV-6. We have checked all the prints and can not find a precise = location demension wise for the bottom most hole ( elevator horn = WD-405) for the bolt that connects to the fitting for the push rod. I am = concerned about edge distance as scaling Print # 34 indicates about 5/16 = of an inch. Print #5A has some layout lines which also hint that the = location might be 5/16 in from the edge. This is a 3/16 hole for the = connecting bolt. We have drilled the holes with slightly more than the = 5/16 but didn't want to go much more due to possible impact with = deflections, clearances, etc. Should I be worried. I would believe this = a critical point of the control system. Any comments? Dave Kerzie ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 1996
From: Jerry Springer <jerryflyrv(at)village.yvv.com>
Subject: Re: Gyros
Derrick L. Aubuchon wrote: > > First... > Thanks to all for the responses to my crimping question. > > Next topic....GYROS. > > Is there much difference between Sigma-tek vs RC Allen?? The price > difference is not that large...and in fact, with the info that I have, > AS&S charges more for the RC Allen than the Sigma-Tek...whereas Chief > prices them the other way around. So I don't believe I should choose > based upon cost alone. > Does anyone have specific preferences??? Good/bad experiences with > either?? > > Geeezzz...sooo many decisions....whats a builder to do > > Thanks again in advance, > > RV4 N184DA...STILL in its finishing phase > -- > > Derrick L. Aubuchon > > n184da(at)cctrap.com Derrick I have RC ALLENS in my RV-6 and have had no problems with them even doing aerobatics I think they are a good unit, I have no experience with Sigma Tek so can't speak about them. Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS first flight July 14, 1989 :-) jerryflyrv(at)Village.yvv.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 06, 1996
From: Rion Bourgeois <RION(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Parts Is Parts
>Parts Is Parts: > >I've been inventoring my wing kit. Van's has this bad habit of labeling >the small parts "Bag nnn" without explaining what's in the bag. Now that's >no problem with most things such as rivets, bolts and the like, but how the >heck am I supposed to know what some of these items are? For example, what >the heck are those cone shaped things? And what are those small squares of >sheet metal for in one of the bags? I _assume_ that they are for the >aileron doubler plates, but I don't _like_ to assume anything! > >I can deal with just taking it on faith that the bagged stuff is complete >(if I have an even number of items, that's a good sign) but I want to label >them in my storage cabinet accurately. I hate to guess and end up using the >wrong item, or worse, end up with extra hardware and wonder if I missed >something. Is there a standard reference around that will help me out - >preferably with pictures or drawings? > >Are you listening Van's? It would surely be nice if you were a little more >detailed in the pick list on some of these more esoteric items. > > >Aging Rivets: > >On a related matter, I have heard that rivets will age over time and that >"fresh" rivets are best. I'm on the slow-build plan - it has taken me 18 >months to finish up the empennage kit due to other commitments in my life. >So should I avoid mixing my leftover empennage rivets with the new wing >hardware or is this short enough a period for it not to matter. At the >rate I'm going, I figure it will take 2-3 years to build the wings so this >might be a real issue if I try to use a 4 year old rivet near the end. > > >----- >Bill Pace The only expensive tool >wbpace(at)adnc.com is a cheap tool. > > > There is a pick list with each kit that Van uses to "pick" the bags. There is also another parts list, two-sided in very small print, that identifies what is in each bag. I didn't get the parts list with my fuselage kit and was going nuts trying to ID all the parts in the bags with a building manual when another builder told me about the parts list I should have gotten. I called Van's and they faxed it right over. Sounds like you also failed to get the parts list. In regards to aging rivets, there was an article in Sports Aviation a couple of years ago about Dave Anders' polished RV-4 that was Reserve Grand Champion in '93 or '94. Dave is a dentist, and used his little furnace at work to heat up the rivets to a very specific and very hot temperature, then quenched them in cold water, which made them softer. If you have seen Dave's A/C, you can appreciate the care he went to. However, the temperature is critical, and you can't duplicate this technique with the kitchen stove. The rivets I have gotten in each kit vary slightly in color, and I have tried to use the newest rivets. However, when I have had to use the older rivets, I haven't noticed any difference. If you want to polish your airplane and try for Reserve Grand .Champion at Oshkosh, you may want to invest in a dentist's furnace. Rion. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Peter Bennett" <bennett(at)healey.com.au>
Date: Jul 06, 1996
Subject: Rocky Mountains Instruments
There was some list traffic a couple of months ago about the RMI uMonitor and uEncoder. RMI have since put up a web page at http://rkymtn.com which not only has their sales literature but also their operating, installation and programming manuals. Wish all suppliers were this switched on to what buyers need! Peter Bennett Sydney Australia RV6 fuselage upright, engine on order. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 06, 1996
From: joehine(at)mi.net (joehine)
Subject: Aircraft Prices
Listers, A friend of mine here in Fredericton who is not on the list asked me to post this question on the list. He is building, on spec, a RV6,6A and last weekend took a prospective buyer for a flight in his flying 6. As you all know having a ride did the trick and the person called him back the next day and wanted a specific price. Jerry was at a loss to say how much a flying well equiped, well build 6 is worth. (self rebuilt 0-320, wood prop, Gyros, one radio, Mode C, and GPS). Could anyone give him an idea, If you are aware of any aircraft in your areas that have sold recently could you drop me a quick line off the list so as to not clutter it up. It would be much appreciated thanks Joe joehine(at)mi.net Comp. 9, Site 8, RR#4 506-452-1072 Home Fredericton, NB 506-452-3495 Work Canada, E3B 4X5 Nobody on their death bed has ever been heard to say "Geeze,I wish I'd spent more time at work" ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 06, 1996
From: barnhart(at)a.crl.com (Dave Barnhart)
Subject: Re: I0-360 in RV-6
Frank Smidler wrote: >I have a chance to get a good deal on an IO-360, slant valve, 200 hp >engine at a decent price (if there is such a thing)... The 200hp IO-360 is the most expensive (and most sought-after) Lycoming on the used market. They command a premium price. It it were ME, I'd snap it up and resell it to some Lancair builder for a profit. Then you could buy the engine you REALLY want and have some money left over. (IMHO Van screwed up when he selected the IO360 for the RV-8. He should have used the IO540. They are less expensive.) Best Regards, Dave Barnhart Dave Barnhart barnhart(at)a.crl.com rv-6 sn 23744 finishing kit on order fuselage out of the jig ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 06, 1996
From: Patrick Kelley <patk(at)mail.ic.net>
Subject: Tank closing
I just closed my left fuel tank last week and wanted to pass on a hopefully handy tip to anyone else doing this task. I was a bit daunted by the thought of making up all those little wooden clamps. I was also concerned because dimpling the rear baffle and skins had caused a slight divergence from the spar, which might possibly get worse as I squeezed the rivets. I had rebent them as best as I could, but the act of assembly spread them out again. Anyway, I borrowed a trick from when I was building fiberglass model sailplanes and needed to mold a removable component in place. Once the rear baffle was riveted, I cleaned the outer skins and removed most of the gunk from the aft surfaces, except where I had oversmeared rivets. I then took saran wrap and placed it on the spar over the flange. Two sheets, top and bottom, gave me plenty of overlap to cover the spar and allow the wrap to trail aft about four inches. Next, I placed the tank in position on the spar (carefully, to avoid tearing the saran wrap), and clecoed it into place, starting with the forward holes and finishing with the aft ones to avoid letting the saran wrap move. The innermost trailing edge, where there are no holes, I clamped to the spar flange with clecoe sidegrips. Sure enough, there had been a couple of places where the trailing edge wanted to gap about one eighth of an inch. Today, after the Proseal had cured for over forty-eight hours, I removed the tank from the spar. There was some minor sticking where Proseal had followed the clecoes through the saran wrap, but not enough to cause any problem. The best part is that the tank skins remained in their clamped condition, tight to the spar flange. I am now ready to pressure test and (hopefully) call another part completed. Just thought I'd throw this out in case it aids others. PatK - RV-6A - Working on Landing Light installation today. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 06, 1996
From: barnhart(at)a.crl.com (Dave Barnhart)
Subject: Re: wing closure - final riveting
roycec(at)ozemail.com.au wrote: >What I am worring about is that I built the rear spar before I read the >excellent Justice manual (Thanks F.J. if you're out there) and riveted the >area where the root ribs go with the shop head on the inside. >I riveted the top skins on and can get the root ribs out at the moment, but >as I rivet the skins I assume the rear spar will get harder to push down. >Should I just rivet the ribs in place before I start the lower skin and live >with the pop rivets. I did the "insert root ribs after riveting top and bottom skins on" method for my first wing. I decided that riveting those ribs to the rear spar was so difficult (many of them are blocked by the flap brace), that I decided to try a different method on the second wing. I am happy to report that you can go ahead and rivet ALL the ribs to the spars BEFORE riveting the skins on. When riveting the final (in my case bottom) skins on, I was able to reach in through the lightning holes in the root ribs and buck all of the rivets. (I was even able to do the bucking and riveting in this area by myself.) Best Regards, Dave Barnhart barnhart(at)a.crl.com Fuselage out of the jig finishing kit on order ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Postmaster(at)gateway.altonet.com
Date: Jul 05, 1996
Subject: Re: wing closure - final riveting
Royce, Early this year I was in Bakersfield talking to the RV family there. They made a special bucking bar for this problem. They sketched up a drawing for me at the time, but I didn't save it. I have just finished the tanks and skin closure is next. Ive mulled this stage over for a year now and at this time I believe this is how I'm going to do it. Bottom skin last. I see that I can get my hands into everything except the few rivets near the rear spar. I am going to weld a handle onto a bucking bar at about a 30 degree angle and bend it as needed to get the job done. If I (God fobid) make a dent, it will be on the bottom. A good alternitave way would be to do the top last and pop the few you have to, then cover them with the 'walk mat'. I plan on covering that area with a 'walk mat anyway, wether I poprivet that area or not. Cecil Hatfield You wrote the following: I riveted the top skins on and can get the root ribs out at the moment, but as I rivet the skins I assume the rear spar will get harder to push down. Should I just rivet the ribs in place before I start the lower skin and live with the pop rivets. I would prefer not to. Any views from thoes in the know? Royce Craven roycec(at)ozemail.com.au ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BPattonsoa(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 06, 1996
Subject: Where to put the Strobe Power Unit in a -6
I am busy just putting things in before riveting together the forward fues frame of the fues. Skin to be left off until the day before painting. Came to the Whelan Power unit for the strobes, (not the local unit, but the big one.) It is about 1" too wide to fit between frames under the seat. I have come up with the following possible locations: 1. Just forward of the fuel valve assembly 2. Behind the seat, exposed to the baggage compt., just ahead of the flap tube 3. Behind the baggage compartment (how to support?) 4. Your better idea! Considering wire runs, getting in the seat hassles, radio noise, exposure to damage, etc, what is the lists preferences? Bruce Patton ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DerFlieger(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 06, 1996
Subject: Re: Cripming question
Try a nicopress tool. Jim Stugart ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DerFlieger(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 06, 1996
Subject: Re: Exhaust for sale
> I noticed that some builders are waiting for exhaust systems. I have an Allan Tolle stainless crossover system for an 0-360. Used it over 300 hours with NO cracking anywhere. Secret is to hang each pipe from the engine sump bolts, and cross brace the two pipes just before they exit the cowl. Friend of mine has the same system with over 600 hours and NO cracks. $350. including shipping. Jim Stugart DerFlieger(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 06, 1996
From: Don Mack <donmack(at)theramp.net>
Subject: Wing Done!
Just completed the wings after 2 years and 566 hours. I guess it's time to go back in the basement and start looking at those fuselage parts. don mack rv-6a ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 06, 1996
From: Steve Mayer <72652.670(at)CompuServe.COM>
Subject: PPG prep question
Does anyone know what the PPG equivalent to alumiprep and alodyne is? TIA, Steve Mayer RV-4 empenage ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 06, 1996
From: ammeterj(at)seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re: Where to put the Strobe Power Unit in a -6
>I am busy just putting things in before riveting together the forward fues >frame of the fues. Skin to be left off until the day before painting. Came >to the Whelan Power unit for the strobes, (not the local unit, but the big >one.) > >It is about 1" too wide to fit between frames under the seat. I have come up >with the following possible locations: > >1. Just forward of the fuel valve assembly >2. Behind the seat, exposed to the baggage compt., just ahead of the flap >tube >3. Behind the baggage compartment (how to support?) >4. Your better idea! > >Considering wire runs, getting in the seat hassles, radio noise, exposure to >damage, etc, what is the lists preferences? > >Bruce Patton > > > My choice would be forward of the fuel valve assembly. Easy to get at in case of need for repair and it puts the weight forward of the CG. John Ammeter ammeterj(at)seanet.com 3233 NE 95th St Seattle WA, 98115 USA RV-6 N16JA Flying 5 years ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 06, 1996
Subject: Re: rv 6 crash / Boulder , CO.
>Did anyone catch the news last Sunday ( CNN ) . A glider turned to >avoid a couple of airplanes and ended up hitting the prop of yet >another plane . The glider landed safely but the plane crashed upside >down . They showed a closeup which confirmed it was a 6 or 6a . Does >anyone have any knowledge of this ? Hi All: I was at Longmont, and I saw the Sunday paper pictures (yechh) and article on this accident. The a/c was a -6, and the collision was head on. The glider's wingtip took a prop blade off the -6. The two gentlemen in the -6 were from Kansas, and the pilot's cousin was in trail formation with them. Evidently, there is a lake near the Boulder airport, and the fellas in the -6 were sightseeing over the lake. The glider was approaching the airport for a landing (made successfully) when the collision occured. The article made no mention of an avoidance manuver performed by the glider pilot previous to the collision with the -6. Evidently, instead of circling over the approach end of the runway, the -6 pilot circled the lake, and landed short in the water. The picture I saw showed the a/c as it was pulled from the water. Most of the front section forward of the spar appeared to be missing. The left fuel tank was also gone. Flip-up canopy was broken. Witnesses dove for the wreck (two recieved gasoline/chemical burns), but didn't find it for 45 min. 50 people were involved in the search. The two occupants were pulled form the wreckage, and taken to the hospital. The pilot was pronounced dead on arrival, but the passenger lived another 6 hours. Check six (Keep your head on a swivel!) Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 06, 1996
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)ltec.net>
Subject: Re: PPG prep question
>Does anyone know what the PPG equivalent to alumiprep and alodyne is? >Steve Mayer Steve, DX 533 Aluminum Cleaner is a phosphoric acid based cleaner and DX 503 is a chronic acid based, chrome conversion coating (gold to tan in color). Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)ltec.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 06, 1996
Subject: Re: PPG prep question
>Does anyone know what the PPG equivalent to alumiprep and alodyne is? The alumaprep equivalent in PPG is DX533 and the equivalent for Alodine (Amchem tradename) in PPG is DX503 (gold). PPG is in Strongsville, OH. Regards, Gary VanRemortel Vanremog(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 06, 1996
From: barnhart(at)a.crl.com (Dave Barnhart)
Subject: Re: Where to put the Strobe Power Unit in a -6
BPattonsoa(at)aol.com wrote: >I am busy just putting things in before riveting together the forward fues >frame of the fues. Skin to be left off until the day before painting. Came >to the Whelan Power unit for the strobes, (not the local unit, but the big >one.) > >It is about 1" too wide to fit between frames under the seat... Mine is going under the baggage floor. I'm riveting a doubler to the skin, and attaching the power supply to that. All of the High-voltage wiring runs aft of the spar anyway. I'll have only one pair of wires then that I have to run from the supply to the panel. (Yes, it means that I cannot pop-rivet the baggage floor down.) Best Regards, Dave Barnhart barnhart(at)a.crl.com rv-6 sn 23744 finishing kit on order fuselage out of the jig ________________________________________________________________________________
From: VIRGILY(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 07, 1996
Subject: RV3-A wing mods
I have an RV3-A. Are the plans and material kits available for distrubution to the owners of the "-A". If not when are they expected to be available?? Is there an online chat room for "RV" types?? virgily ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 06, 1996
From: finnlass(at)ix.netcom.com (Finn Lassen )
Subject: Re: RV3-A wing mods
I'm building an RV3. I understand that Van's will be sending out the plans and even the needed material when it's ready. I requested the plans about 2 months ago, but haven't heard back. I suppose they're not ready yet? Finn finnlass(at)ix.netcom.com You wrote: > >I have an RV3-A. Are the plans and material kits available for distrubution >to the >owners of the "-A". If not when are they expected to be available?? > >Is there an online chat room for "RV" types?? > >virgily > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: TMRV6(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 07, 1996
Subject: Re: Where to put the Strobe Power Unit in a -6
I installed my power unit on the cockpit side of the firewall, high and left of center. So far no interference of any kind. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 07, 1996
From: Pat McClung <pmc123(at)airmail.net>
Subject: RV-3 Parts
The cowl and wing tips I had have been claimed. They have gone to a RV-3 builder. They were available on first come, first served basis. I got a lot of nibbles but no "bites" till yesterday. Thanks for the various responses. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 07, 1996
From: Royce Craven <roycec(at)ozemail.com.au>
Subject: Engines
Can I get a bit of info on types of Lycombing engines that are being used. Good or bad. If they needed to be modified (I'm building one of thoes RV6 with the traning wheel at the front). I'd like a IO-320-???, but what the ??? is I don't know. Which injector/carb used etc. Thanks Royce Craven roycec(at)ozemail.com.au ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 07, 1996
From: Kelli Lewis <mikel(at)dimensional.com>
Subject: Re: rv 6 crash / Boulder , CO.
> >>Did anyone catch the news last Sunday ( CNN ) . A glider turned to >>avoid a couple of airplanes and ended up hitting the prop of yet >>another plane . The glider landed safely but the plane crashed upside >>down . They showed a closeup which confirmed it was a 6 or 6a . Does >>anyone have any knowledge of this ? > Hey, RV guys. I live 7 miles from Boulder and was at the Longmont Fly-in the day of the accident. I talked to a glider pilot from Boulder and apparently both craft were in the pattern for landing. The glider runway (dirt) parallels the hard runway for the powered types. The lake is on the approach end-and I do mean ON THE APPROACH END (houses houses dirt trees water water fence runway) and I understand they have put a few airplanes in the lake over the years. (I give it a pretty good look when I land there.) The story I got (and who knows) was that the wing of the glider clipped the prop and the landing gear of the -6 and the pilot went AROUND even with a damaged prop. As he was lining up again for final, he pulled power and the engine shut down and it was a stall/spin into the lake (NTSB report pending). The lake isn't that deep which was the problem getting to the occupants: it was up-side-down in the water and they couldn't get to them for 45 minutes. For having hit solid water, the aircraft looked remarkably intact (thanks, Van). OK.....YIKES!!!! Now: some of the lessons: 1. FLY THE AIRPLANE A. I can't IMAGINE the vibration that was being experienced by a damaged prop but it must have been quite the distraction. 2. FLY THE AIRPLANE A. Sometimes the airport is NOT the best place to land. There are some airports that give me the creeps (Portage WI, for example) because if something goes wrong its trees and houses. The airport at Boulder is surrounded by houses and junk but the surrounding area is fields fields fields. From pattern altitude or so there were many choices available that would have made the walk back to the house longer but not quite as newsworthy. One of the advantages of a slick airplane is, if the fan stops, there is a longer glide to THE NOISE if the need arives. 3. Know your airplane A. From any given altitude do you know where you have to go/are able to get to if you suddenly have to land?? Have you practiced that lately?? B. Fly a lot. We have been given such a great airplane (thanks, Van), why not?? When I hear of someone having the test hours "flown off" by some other pilot, it makes me wonder: what a missed opportunity to get to know the airplane a little more. 4. Hit something slowly at a shallow angle A. Kit Aircraft this month ran an article about the speed and angle of a volunteer touchdown that would be survivable. (Again a hemorrhoid subject: if we don't talk about it, it won't happen.) The article basicly stated that (I am paraphrasing) since Van designed us such a GREAT airplane that goes fast AND goes SLOW we should be able to walk away from an unscheduled touch of the dirt complaining the whole time (Thanks, Van). If you need to hit something you don't want to, make it at the end of your landing roll when things are slowing down. 5. DON'T STALL A. Fly the airplane (did I mention that?) 6. CNN A. If it was news enough to make CNN, that means it was big news which means it was something unusual. But it still happens and is one of the most worried about occurances in aviation. 7. LOOK AROUND A. You can't look around enough. As the old military training manual says "A sore neck is better than a broken one." Michael RV-4 232 SQ mikel(at)dimensional.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: av8r(at)hic.net
Date: Jul 07, 1996
Subject: Lightweight starters
Hi Group! Bad news, my starter went out last night so I'm going to take the opportunity to replace it with one of the lightweight ones. In my trade-a-plane there seems to be 2 reasonable options. Under Lycoming parts etc. is one from a company called Air-Tec for $199, with a "for homebuilders" rider, or I can get a Sky Tec from Sky Ranch for $359 - does anyone out there have experience with these or indeed any other suggestions? Thanks in advance Rob Lee - av8r(at)hic.net temporarily non-flying 6A - N517RL ________________________________________________________________________________
From: jpl(at)showpg.mn.org (Joe Larson)
Subject: Spray guns
Date: Jul 06, 1996
I thought I'd relate something regarding painting. Most of you already know this, but people who are just starting out could learn from my mistake. When I started my RV, I was told to pick up a small touch-up gun for priming. I related this to mean to pick up an inexpensive gun, so I went to Menard's and bought an inexpensive spray gun, but it was larger than a touch up gun. It's been hell ever since. Last night, I went to Sears and bought their $50 touch-up gun. I used it to finish priming my wing spars. What a difference! This gun worked great! There are two important lessons: 1. Don't buy a cheap "handyman's" gun. A $50 is still pretty cheap when it to guns, but it's more than I spent the first time. 2. Make sure you use lacquer thinner, not mineral spirits, for cleaning up primer. Be thorough. -Joe -- Joe Larson jpl(at)showpg.mn.org 612-591-1037 Showpage Software, Inc. http://www.wavefront.com/~showpg 6121 St. Croix Ave. N. Golden Valley, Mn 55422 Future RV-6A pilot. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JamesCone(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 07, 1996
Subject: Re: Where to put the Strobe Power Unit in a -6
I put mine on the forward side of the instrument sub panel using nutplates. There is plenty of room and helps make up for the fact that I weigh more than my significant bucker, also know as my very understanding wife. Jim Cone jamescone(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JamesCone(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 07, 1996
Subject: Re: PPG prep question
Alumiprep is DX533 Aluminum Conditioner. Alodine is DX503 Aluminum Conditioner. Jim Cone jamescone(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 07, 1996
From: wbpace(at)adnc.com (Bill Pace)
Subject: Re: rv 6 crash / Boulder , CO.
Here are two articles I found on the net. They're from the Colorado Springs Gazette Telegraph. Reprinted without permission from their web site. Sunday, June 30: 2 die after plane, glider collide in midair near Boulder -------------------------------------------------------- Associated Press BOULDER -- Two occupants of a small, single-engine airplane suffered fatal injuries Saturday when the plane crashed into Hayden Lake after colliding in mid-air with a glider, officials said. A Federal Aviation Administration spokesperson in Seattle said the plane, a home built RV-4, was registered to an owner in Emporia, Kan. The names of the victims were not released. Witnesses said the plane and the glider collided in mid-air. The pilot of the glider told authorities he made a sharp turn to avoid two other aircraft he had spotted and collided with the plane. His name was not released. The glider made a safe landing at nearby Boulder Airport. A passenger on the glider was`treated at a local hospital for chest pains and then released. Authorities said the pilot of the airplane radioed after the crash that he was returning to the airport, but the plane apparently stalled on approach and crashed into the lake. Arnold Scott, an investigator with the National Transportation Safety Board said the plane's propeller may have been damaged in the collision. "We believe he was missing a propeller blade .. and could have been losing control because of that," Scott said. Flying the plane with a missing propeller blade could have created a tremendous vibration that would make the plane extremely difficult to control, Scott said. After the plane plunged into the lake, witnesses swam or boated to the site`and attached a line to the sunken plane, but were unable to rescue the occupants because the plane was upside down. Divers from the Boulder Fire Department said they couldn't get to the submerged cockpit because of debris and the wreckage was towed to`shore. After the plane was hauled to shore, the two occupants were removed and taken to Boulder Community Hospital, where one was pronounced dead on arrival and the other died a few hours later. ***** Monday, July 1: Plane crash victims identified ------------------------------ The two men who died Saturday in Boulder after their single-engine airplane collided with a glider and plunged into a lake near a municipal airport were identified early Sunday. David R. Prevatt, 49, and Barry D. Balkenhol, 40, both of Emporia, Kan., were taken to Boulder Community Hospital Saturday where Prevatt was pronounced dead on arrival and Balkenhol died about six hours later. Autopsies were to be performed Sunday. Investigators said the glider's left wing struck the left wheel of the small airplane at about 6,100 feet over the east end of a runway at Boulder Municipal Airport, sending the plane into nearby Hayden Lake. The pilot of the glider was identified as Alfonso Ossorio, 35. His passenger was identified as Robert Murr, 50. Their hometowns were not released. The airplane, registered to Prevatt, was a home built RV-6. Murr apparently believed he was suffering a heart attack, said sheriff's Sgt. Dick Dutrow. Murr was later treated for chest pains at a local hospital and was released. Ossorio tried to land the glider and dived after spotting two planes, said a Boulder County Emergency Services spokesman. The airplane pilot appeared to know his aircraft had been struck, banked to the right in an attempt to land and lost power over the lake, authorities said. The glider later landed at the airport safely. Arnold Scott, an investigator with the National Transportation Safety Board said the plane's propeller may have been damaged inM the collision. After the plane plunged into the lake, about 20 witnesses swam or boated to the site and attached a line to the sunken plane, but were unable to rescue the occupants because the plane was upside down. The airplane was hauled to shore by a tow truck after emergency land crews and divers determined it would be faster and safer. Lt. Lori Miller of the Boulder Fire Department estimated the victims were in the water for about 45 minutes to an hour. They were both belted into their seats, she said. "It all happened in about 45 seconds," said Kellen Sinning, 13, of Boulder, who works for the company that owns the glider. "There was this black circle of smoke circling down from the plane. I yelled, `Get the fire extinguisher!' and ran out to the lake to try to help." Two unidentified men who tried to rescue the victims were treated for gasoline burns and later released from a county hospital. The airplane had been at an air show in Longmont, said airportJspokesman Martin Boniek. ----- Bill Pace The only expensive tool wbpace(at)adnc.com is a cheap tool. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 07, 1996
From: Ron Caldwell <74504.1365(at)CompuServe.COM>
Subject: Two Wing Building
My wing kit finally arrived two days ago. I have heard there are some benefits and time savings to building both wings together. I do have space for both jigs but would like to get some other opinions from those of you that have done so. Can this process help to eliminate mistakes or cause mistakes to be transferred to the other set of wings being built? Thanks in advance for your suggestions. Ron Caldwell RV6A (Ready to Start Wings) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WCannon313(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 07, 1996
Subject: Re: Lightweight starters
Rob Lee I have a sky tec PM starter on the O-360 in my -6. The same engine was in a t-18 that I owned before with the stock prestolite. Can't vouch for the durability, but the thing weighs about half as much and turns the the engine what seems like twice as fast. Appears to be a quality product---installation was a snap. Walt Cannon First flight last week -- 12 hours now -- sweet!!!!!! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 07, 1996
From: Bob Haan <bobh(at)synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: PPG prep question
>Does anyone know what the PPG equivalent to alumiprep and alodyne is? > > >TIA, >Steve Mayer >RV-4 empenage alumiprep = "Aluminum Cleaner" DX533 alodyne = "Aluminum Conditioner" DX503 Bob Haan Portland, OR RV6-A 2 wings in the jigs, LEs, Top Skins, Tanks, Ailerons, Flaps done bobh(at)synopsys.com Evenings 503-636-3550 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 07, 1996
From: wbpace(at)adnc.com (Bill Pace)
Subject: Jon Johanson (chatter)
For those of you with web browsers, there is a web page covering Jon Johanson's flight at http://saaa.nasma.com. The link on the EAA page is wrong (there is no "www." in the URL). There's lots of info here on his accomplishments and his current Round-The-World mission. Frankly, I think I'm just a little in awe of him and the Aussies are justly proud of him. As they say on one of the pages "Jon Johanson is an ordinary Australian doing extraordinary things!" Here's this guy, a simple man, a nurse, doing something most of us wouldn't even dream of, especially in a homebuilt. Personally I think aviation suffers an over abundance of inflated egos and self-promotion and sometimes it wants to make me puke. But having this guy do something so incredible _twice_, the first time on a shoe string budget, wants to make me cheer! Guys like this are the true heros of aviation. (Of course, nothing succeeds like success. I noticed a lot more corporate sponsor's logos on his fuselage this time :-) ). GO JON! ------ Bill Pace Just an ordinary American wbpace(at)adnc.com doing ordinary things. ----- Bill Pace The only expensive tool wbpace(at)adnc.com is a cheap tool. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 07, 1996
From: Curt Reimer <Curt_Reimer(at)MBnet.MB.CA>
Subject: Re: Elevator Control horn - Hole Location
On Fri, 5 Jul 1996, David Kerzie wrote: > We are in the process of installing the aft elevator push rod in our RV-6. We have checked all the prints and can not find a precise location demension wise for the bottom most hole ( elevator horn WD-405) for the bolt that connects to the fitting for the push rod. I am concerned about edge distance as scaling Print # 34 indicates about 5/16 of an inch. Print #5A has some layout lines which also hint that the location might be 5/16 in from the edge. This is a 3/16 hole for the connecting bolt. We have drilled the holes with slightly more than the 5/16 but didn't want to go much more due to possible impact with deflections, clearances, etc Since the elevator is restrained by the control stops, should it be forced to one extreme of travel or the other, I think that the most force that that connecting bolt would see would be the force exerted by your own muscles, multiplied by the mechanical advantage of the stick. So, say 200 lbs of pull x 3:1 advantage (a guess) is 600 lbs, divide by two since there are two bearing surfaces for the bolt (the holes in the left and right elevator horn). So those holes need to take about 300 lbs of shear, maximum. Since you allowed 5/16 edge distance, and the elevator horns are pretty heavy guage steel, my guess would be that the AN3 bolt would fail first, and an AN3 bolt should be good for at least 2000 lbs of shear, so that's about a 7:1 safety factor, I reckon. Curt Reimer ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JAllen6526(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 07, 1996
Subject: Re: Fuse. RV-6 jig avail in So. Cal
I will be removing my RV-6A from its wooden jig in the next several weeks. If someone in So. California needs a jig I would part with it for the cost of the lumber, about $50.00 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: LesDrag(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 07, 1996
Subject: Re: Wing Tip vs Fuselage Antenna
> Has anyone analyzed, calculated, estimated, or SWAGed how much drag >would be saved by using wing tip antennae as opposed to fuselage antennae? > How would the saving translate to performance? Would the drag associated >with fuselage antennae be less if mounted on the fuselage bottom in dirty >air? > I am at the point of needing to decide wheather to route an extra cable >or conduit for a wing tip antenna. Any thoughts???? > >Ken Harrill >RV - 6 >KHarrill @aol.com I talked to Tracy Saylor (220+ mph RV-6) about this, since he has been busy removing his external antenna's and replacing them with wing tip antenna's. Tracy felt that there may be a 1 mph drag penalty in having the COM antenna outside the aircraft. For my two cents, since the Sportcraft wingtip NAV antenna (the drag of two COM antennas) can get the same reception as the extrenal NAV antenna, why hang those ugly antenna's on the outside of the aircraft. I have been on vacation. I haven't gotten the new exhaust pipes back on my LOM engine yet, so I can check out the Sportcraft wingtip COM antenna for myself. (Still reserving judgement on this one.) Jim Ayers LOM M332A RV-3 N47RV Maroon Marauder LesDrag(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 1996
From: Leo Davies <leo(at)icn.su.OZ.AU>
Subject: Re: Where to put the Strobe Power Unit in a -6
Bruce, I plan to put mine under the baggage compartment floor and have made my right sided baggage floor removable (all nut plates instead of LP 4s ). I have seen other peopl build a little hatch in the floor. Leo Davies 6A >I am busy just putting things in before riveting together the forward fues >frame of the fues. Skin to be left off until the day before painting. Came >to the Whelan Power unit for the strobes, (not the local unit, but the big >one.) > >It is about 1" too wide to fit between frames under the seat. I have come up >with the following possible locations: > >1. Just forward of the fuel valve assembly >2. Behind the seat, exposed to the baggage compt., just ahead of the flap >tube >3. Behind the baggage compartment (how to support?) >4. Your better idea! > >Considering wire runs, getting in the seat hassles, radio noise, exposure to >damage, etc, what is the lists preferences? > >Bruce Patton > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mcarob(at)ozemail.com.au
Date: Jul 08, 1996
Subject: Two Wings Together ??
My wing kit finally arrived two days ago. I have heard there are some benefits and time savings to building both wings together. I do have space for both jigs but would like to get some other opinions from those of you that have done so. Can this process help to eliminate mistakes or cause mistakes to be transferred to the other set of wings being built? Thanks in advance for your suggestions. Ron Caldwell RV6A (Ready to Start Wings) Ron, My -6 wings are in the final skinning stages and have been built parallel in two jigs. I can recommend doing both together if you have the room, but there are drawbacks. "Murphy's Law" is really alive and well in Oz and it is really easy to duplicate mistakes, particularly in measurement of main rib locations on the rear spars (trust me). The overriding law is of course "be careful" and check every thing you do on each wing as you proceed, dont get one "right" and then just copy to the other. I have about four feet between jigs and can easily work between them. The wings are positioned so that the upper surfaces face inwards towards one another. Another local builder simply extended the arms of the one jig and built the wings back-to-back, this is OK, but he does complain about having to jump over the rear spar braces and squeeze around the single central jig upright. After thirteen months, I am getting a bit sick of looking at wings, but am glad of not facing the prospect of "doing it all over again" Rob McAnally mcarob(at)ozemail.com.au RV-6 Wings almost done. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 07, 1996
From: John Darby <johnd@our-town.com>
Subject: Re: Lightweight starters
>Bad news, my starter went out last night so I'm going to take the >opportunity to replace it with one of the lightweight ones. Rob; If I were you, I wouldn't leave Mark Landoll's Electrical Service out of the running. I'm using his light wt. starter and have been very pleased with it. His phone # is (405) 685-0239 or 392-3847. It is a remfd Datsun starter and mounting bracket, at the time I bought it, it was 197.00 including frt. It sure turns my 0-320 over fast. johnd John Darby RV6 N61764 flying johnd@our-town.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Arvator(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 07, 1996
Subject: RV-List:Empennage/HS Ribs
I am in the process of placing the ribs onto the spars of my -8 horizontal stabilizer. The manual says that when you install the HS-404 rib it must be trimmed to clear the HS-814 aluminum bracket. If you trim according to the plans then the rivet that goes in that spot will not have enough edge clearance. I have thought about moving the rib over slightly so that I would not have trim so close to the rivet hole, but since the skins are pre-drilled I can not do this. The plans even show this rivet with very little edge clearance. What have others done here or am I overlooking something? Tripp Myrick RV-8 #80085 Assembling HS skeleton ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RFlunker(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 07, 1996
Subject: RV-6A Fuse Jig Wanted - Dallas Area
I'm still working on my left wing, but I have my Fuselage kit on order so am starting to look for a fuse jig. I expect it will be early September before I actually need it. If you have one or know of one that is or will be available, please contact me. I live just north of Dallas so please keep responses to those in this area - ie within 100 miles or so. Let's not flood the list with this - please contact me directly.. Dick Flunker (RFLUNKER(at)AOL.COM) RV-6A ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 07, 1996
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)ltec.net>
Subject: Re: Lightweight starters
>In my trade-a-plane there seems to be 2 reasonable options. Under >Lycoming parts etc. is one from a company called Air-Tec for $199, >with a "for homebuilders" rider, or I can get a Sky Tec from Sky Ranch >for $359 - does anyone out there have experience with these or indeed >any other suggestions? >Rob Lee - av8r(at)hic.net Rob, I'm using the Sky Tec lightweight starter. It has 290 hours on it and no problems. When I first installed it, it developed an internal short. I sent it back and put the old Prestolite starter on that came with the engine. The Sky Tec was repaired promptly and hasn't missed a lick since. The Sky Tec spins the prop with more gusto that the heavy Prestolite. I have heard some negative comment about some new versions of starters that they were/are using on Lycomings. I don't know if this is the model that Air-Tec is selling. Even with the problem with the Sky Tec, I'm satisfied and would probably buy another one. Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)ltec.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mcarob(at)ozemail.com.au
Date: Jul 08, 1996
Subject: Full Swiveling Tail Wheel
Folks, Has anybody out there had any experience with the full swiveling tail wheel for the RV-6? At the time I ordered my kit the new tail wheel was not an option and I was supplied with the origional unit. Is the new swiveling unit worth the modification of the origional ? Regards Rob McAnally mcarob(at)ozemail.com.au ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 1996
From: John Morrissey <John.Morrissey(at)its.csiro.au>
Subject: Re: Full Swiveling Tail Wheel
G'day Rob, The full swiveling tailwheel is real nice to have if you are tight for hangar space. It allows you to push the RV6 backwards without having to lift the tailplane. The swiveling tailwheel has much higher quality bearings and it still has all the nice features of being steerable. All in all - highly recommended!! John >Folks, > >Has anybody out there had any experience with the full swiveling tail wheel >for the RV-6? >At the time I ordered my kit the new tail wheel was not an option and I was >supplied with the origional unit. >Is the new swiveling unit worth the modification of the origional ? > >Regards > >Rob McAnally >mcarob(at)ozemail.com.au > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- John Morrissey CSIRO ITS Communications Section Phone:- 06 2766811 Fax:- 06 2766617 Mobile:- 018 628804 Email:- John.Morrissey(at)its.csiro.au CSIRO ---- AUSTRALIA'S SCIENCE, AUSTRALIA'S FUTURE! --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rwoodard(at)lawyernet.com
Date: Jul 07, 1996
Subject: RV-List:Empennage/HS Ribs
RV>I am in the process of placing the ribs onto the spars of my -8 horizontal RV>stabilizer. The manual says that when you install the HS-404 rib it must be RV>trimmed to clear the HS-814 aluminum bracket. If you trim according to the RV>plans then the rivet that goes in that spot will not have enough edge RV>clearance. I have thought about moving the rib over slightly so that I woul RV>not have trim so close to the rivet hole, but since the skins are pre-drille RV>I can not do this. The plans even show this rivet with very little edge RV>clearance. What have others done here or am I overlooking something? RV>Tripp Myrick RV>RV-8 #80085 RV>Assembling HS skeleton I'm at almost exactly the same point you are. What I've been told that others are doing is a.) remove the rivet hole entirely and leave that rivet out; or b.) go ahead and drive a rivet in there in spite of the improper edge distance. I'm leaning toward cutting the hole out entirely, myself. The most important thing (from what I'm told) is to _NOT_ try to alter the size/shape of the HS-814 tongue. Good luck, keep in touch. Rod Woodard RWoodard(at)lawyernet.com RV-8 #80033 Construction temporarily halted---moving into new building factory (aka, house w/3-car garage) :-) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: TMRV6(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 08, 1996
Subject: Re: Full Swiveling Tail Wheel
The full swivel tailwheel is the only way to fly!! Todd RV-6 N92TM flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: TMRV6(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 08, 1996
Subject: Re: Lightweight starters
I just replaced my Lycoming starter with a Sky-Tek starter. I love it. If you have a front mounted oil cooler you will need to use the PM model as the solenoid will not interfere with the cooler. Hope this helps. Todd RV-6 N92TM 63 hours ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rust47rg(at)one.net
Date: Jul 08, 1996
Subject: Re: Full Swiveling Tail Wheel
>Folks, > >Has anybody out there had any experience with the full swiveling tail wheel >for the RV-6? >At the time I ordered my kit the new tail wheel was not an option and I was >supplied with the origional unit. >Is the new swiveling unit worth the modification of the origional ? > >Regards > >Rob McAnally >mcarob(at)ozemail.com.au Rob: IMHO Yes.....The only way to go. Send your tailspring back for credit and get the one thats already machined for the swiveling unit. Regards: Rusty Gossard N47RG RV-4 Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robbins Mitch <ROBBINM(at)chi.ntsb.gov>
Subject: Paint Advise Needed ...
Date: Jul 08, 1996
Scott, I'm not envious of your having to strip and respray. I know it's a major task. Orange peel is generally caused by the paint flashing before it flows out. Usually a slightly heavier coat will help but it's always a compromise between flow and sags. Guns and settings are critical. What is potentiallly happening is the primer, being slightly porous, is absorbing solvent causing the laquer to flash. You might try a warmer temperature reducer, or spray when the temperature is cooler. This will retard the hardening and allow the laquer to flow a bit more. My preference for airplanes has never been laquer because it drys very rapidly and takes a great deal of skill to apply it on large surfaces without getting dry spots. Also, although I don't know the specifics in your case, laquer will raise many undercoats resulting in nice blisters. A skilled person can probably achieve the nicest finish with laquer but it requires an extreme amount of talent and rubbing. Urethanes such as DuPont imron or Ditzler (PPG) durethane, dispite the safety precautions necessary to spray them, will flow for about 5 days. Thus the "wet" look and an extremely durable finish. My personal preference is PPG DP40 or 50 primer. No sanding is required if color is applied within a few days, and PPG durethane colors. I only recommend the DP primer for use in areas that will be painted, not as a preservative for interior parts. It will work as a seal coat over many undercoats and will accept many different top coats. PPG has excellent literature for compatability. Always spray some test panels first to be sure every thing is working right, then spray the airplane. Acrylic enamels are a good compromise. They flow better than laquer but supposedly are not as dangerous to spray as the urethanes. Use a hardner with acrylic enamel to obtain a more durable finish. I'm not an expert but have obtained some very nice results. Good Luck! Mitch Robbins ---------- From: owner-rv-list[SMTP:owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com] Sent: Friday, July 05, 1996 3:54 PM Subject: RV-List: Paint Advise Needed ... I am using Randolph Aircraft Acrylic Laquer to paint my airplane. I have used it many times spraying Piper Cherokees and have had good results. But I always sprayed over the pre-existing Acrylic Laquer. Randolph Acrylic Laquer was used on Pipers almost 20 years. Heres my problem. I purchased the companies Epibond epoxy primer that they say you can use with their Acrylic Laquer. We first coated the alumipreped and alodined aluminum with this Randolph epoxy primer. We let it sit two days as recommended, and then sprayed with the Randolph acrylic laquer. The results were terrible ! We got a significant orange peel. To make sure it wasnt the gun settings, we sprayed bare aluminum and got perfect results with the laquer. I called the chief chemist at Randolph and talked to the president of Randolph paints and they gave me many suggestions which we tried with the same results. I am so frustrated it is unbelievable. So we bought aircraft stripper to take off the paint and the primer, and the primer won't come all off. The president of Randolph aircraft paints has been unwilling to give me an compensation even for the paint. Since I have already bought the acrylic laquer I am contemplating doing the following. 1.) Strip off as much primer as I can with aircraft stripper. 2.) Spray with Dupont Variprime. 3.) Top coat the Variprime with Dupont Variseal (spelling ?) 4.) Then spray the Randolph acrylic laquer. If anybody can give me recommendations on what to do I would greatly appreciate it. I certainly think Randolph support in standing behind their products at this point is terrible. If they were in this state, I would be filling out a small claims suit at this moment. When I called Dupont, they said you can't use an epoxy primer with acrylic laquer. Why does Randolph paints say you can ? (Yet both the chemist and president at Randolph say you can.) So frustrated and mad I could ... Scott Johnson rvgasj(at)mcs.com P.S. Any good information will be rewarded with a free dinner when we meet at Oshkosh !!!!! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Foyboy6(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 08, 1996
Subject: Lightweight starters
I purchased a new Lyc 0-360A1A engine through Van's Aircraft. It came from the factory with a lightweight starter. When the engine was hot, the starter jammed every time and had to be hand propped. Since the engine was still in warranty, Lycoming replaced the lightweight starter with a new "old style" starter and the invoice showed a price of $1200.00! I'm sure glad I didn't have to pay that one! Anyway I have never had a bit of trouble with the second starter after 230 hours. John ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 1996
From: Scott Gesele <scottg(at)villagenet.com>
Subject: Re: Two Wing Building
>My wing kit finally arrived two days ago. I have heard there are some benefits >and time savings to building both wings together. I do have space for both jigs >but would like to get some other opinions from those of you that have done so. >Can this process help to eliminate mistakes or cause mistakes to be transferred >to the other set of wings being built? Thanks in advance for your suggestions. > >Ron Caldwell >RV6A (Ready to Start Wings) > > > Ron, I built both wings at the same time in a two car garage. The spars were laid out at a right angle to each other. With this arrangement, only three uprights are needed. Pictures of my wings going together, along with the rest of the project, are upon the web at http://www.villagenet.com/~scottg . I would highly recommend building both at once, if you have the room. It was easier, faster, and after building one, I wouldn't want to start over again. There are two flying -4's in my local chapter. One builder built both at once, the other one at a time. Both agree that, space permitting, you should build both at once. Hope this helps. -Scott N506RV (working on cowl) scottg(at)villagenet.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WStucklen(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 08, 1996
Subject: Re: Where to put the Strobe Power Unit in a -6
<< I am busy just putting things in before riveting together the forward fues frame of the fues. Skin to be left off until the day before painting. Came to the Whelan Power unit for the strobes, (not the local unit, but the big one.) It is about 1" too wide to fit between frames under the seat. I have come up with the following possible locations: 1. Just forward of the fuel valve assembly 2. Behind the seat, exposed to the baggage compt., just ahead of the flap tube 3. Behind the baggage compartment (how to support?) 4. Your better idea! Considering wire runs, getting in the seat hassles, radio noise, exposure to damage, etc, what is the lists preferences? Bruce Patton >> I put mine in front o fthe fuel valve. Running the wires is no problem, especially if you have put the wing wire runs in front of the spare. Otherwise, you have to go throught the spare, but that's not a big a problem as you might think. Fred Stucklen RV-6A N925RV wstucklen(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WStucklen(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 08, 1996
Subject: Re: rv 6 crash / Boulder , CO.
<< I was at Longmont, and I saw the Sunday paper pictures (yechh) and article on this accident. The a/c was a -6, and the collision was head on. The glider's wingtip took a prop blade off the -6. The two gentlemen in the -6 were from Kansas, and the pilot's cousin was in trail formation with them. Evidently, there is a lake near the Boulder airport, and the fellas in the -6 were sightseeing over the lake. The glider was approaching the airport for a landing (made successfully) when the collision occured. The article made no mention of an avoidance manuver performed by the glider pilot previous to the collision with the -6. Evidently, instead of circling over the approach end of the runway, the -6 pilot circled the lake, and landed short in the water. The picture I saw showed the a/c as it was pulled from the water. Most of the front section forward of the spar appeared to be missing. The left fuel tank was also gone. Flip-up canopy was broken. Witnesses dove for the wreck (two recieved gasoline/chemical burns), but didn't find it for 45 min. 50 people were involved in the search. The two occupants were pulled form the wreckage, and taken to the hospital. The pilot was pronounced dead on arrival, but the passenger lived another 6 hours. Check six (Keep your head on a swivel!) Mark >> Thisshould be a reminder to all that, when you fly a fast airplane like the RV's, ALL OTHERS ARE A TARGET....... When you're near an airport readying to land, SLOW DOWN...... Fred Stucklen RV-6A N925RV wstucklen(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 1996
From: John Darby <johnd@our-town.com>
Subject: Re: Full Swiveling Tail Wheel
>Is the new swiveling unit worth the modification of the origional ? > Rob; I have the orig. type tail wheel. I was worried that it would keep me from making tight turns on the ground-- no problem, it turns as well as the full swivel. One draw back, when you want to push the a/c backwards-it acts up. I got an old cessna tail wheel draw bar, spring clamps over the nuts on each side of the wheel axle and can pull it very easy without lifting the tail. It works for me and without the expense of the full swivel. As I said, the only time it's a hassle is if you try to push the a/c backwards. The original will swivel at least 90 degrees no problem in ground taxi. john d John Darby RV6 N61764 flying johnd@our-town.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: walsh(at)cpeedy.ENET.dec.com
Date: Jul 08, 1996
Subject: Re: Variprime Warning, Did You Know ...
Variprime...... Other than the Epoxy "Stuff", I don't see that there is any way to "seal" the inside surfaces without a top coat. So.... What's wrong with shooting "variseal"?? over the Variprime? Can you shoot it right after? Or do you have to wait a day or so? Specifically, are there any special procedures necessary for use of Variseal? Also, did the Chemist indicate that Variprime might make matters worse? Remember the filliform corrosion that the Cessnas suffered. I believe that the paint they used actually absorbed moisture. The alum would have been better off not painted at all. John ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6junkie(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 08, 1996
Subject: Re: Aircraft Prices
It depends on..... well just about everything. I have seen well equiped RV-6's in the $60,000 to $75,000 range. However, there are people who charge $50,000 to complete an RV. When you add all of the other costs that works out to about $90,000. I for one like to see these high resale prices. The RV's enjoy the highest resale return in the kitplane business. Gary Corde RV-6 N211GC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6junkie(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 08, 1996
Subject: Re: Aging rivets & Useless Vari Prime
OH PLEASE, lets not scare everybody (especially all the people that scare easily) with this one again. And that goes for the latest Veri-Prime thing as well. Worry about the important stuff like finding time to finish your plane or where to find an engine. There is so much good information on this list but every now and then I feel that I must interject to help other sort through the BS.... There are plenty of people that used "superannuated" rivets to complete their RV's. My RV took almost 6 years to complete and there are many others that took longer. I didn't replace my rivets every 18 months nor did I give them a shower and a bath or what ever else I have read about. I even drove rivets in 30 degree temps. (oh my). If you want to avoid work hardening your rivets do the following: 1) Don't drive them in one fast blast. Feather the trigger on your gun. 2) Drive them to the correct height the first time. Don't get into the habit of driving them a little and then hitting them with "just a little extra". 3) Use the correct bucking bar. The bigger the better. 4) Take your time and enjoy the project. This will not keep you from work hardening your rivets but it will help you to have some fun. I hope that I can help my fellow listers sort the wheat from the chafe. Gary Corde RV-6 N211GC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 1996
From: Phil Arter <arter(at)ncar.ucar.edu>
Subject: Re: RV-List:Empennage/HS Ribs
Tripp, hi What I did was to trim the skin and HS-404 rib about 1/16 - 3/32" out beyond the HS-814 (following the shape of the 814) which is just far enough to totally eliminate the hole in the skin. In my opinion it is not worth trying to save this one rivet, or add one to replace it (which screws up the spacing and looks ugly). Phil arter(at)ncar.ucar.edu >I am in the process of placing the ribs onto the spars of my -8 horizontal >stabilizer. The manual says that when you install the HS-404 rib it must be >trimmed to clear the HS-814 aluminum bracket. If you trim according to the >plans then the rivet that goes in that spot will not have enough edge >clearance. I have thought about moving the rib over slightly so that I would >not have trim so close to the rivet hole, but since the skins are pre-drilled >I can not do this. The plans even show this rivet with very little edge >clearance. What have others done here or am I overlooking something? > >Tripp Myrick >RV-8 #80085 >Assembling HS skeleton > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 1996
From: twg(at)blink.ho.att.com (Tom Goeddel(x5278))
Subject: Re: wing closure - final riveting
I had already riveted the wing walk ribs in place before I heard about the idea of putting them in one at a time. I found a sequence to close the bottom skin that I found worked well - no horrible contortions, need for child labor, etc. I started at the rear spar and riveted up all of the wing walk ribs simultaneously. That is, one rivet in the first rib, one in the second, one in the third, one in the fourth, one in the fifth, then back for another in the first, another in the second, etc. Once it got too tight to reach in from the top (by the main spar), the last few rivets in each rib and those on the main spar could be reached either through the forward lightening hole, or from the outboard bay. You are basically doing all of the the tough to reach rivets at the rear of the wing walk area while the forward part of the skin is completely unattached and can be peeled back for easy access. Once the wing walk area is done, the rest are relatively easy. This worked well enough for me that I have decided to do it again for the second wing even though I had the option of leaving the ribs un-riveted for this one. Tom Goeddel RV-6a (still finishing the last wing, fuse on order...) goeddel@bell-labs.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Greg Bordelon <greg(at)brokersys.com>
Subject: lCorrosion Control - Primers
Date: Jul 08, 1996
Guys, we are building metal airplanes and with all the talk about primers I have the following thoughts. You can leave your structure bare or prime it with Sher Williams, Variprime, Zinc Chromate or Epoxy primer or what ever. Each has it's own advantages. ALL of them will deteriorate over time leaving you with less protection. During normal service expect scratches, chaffing, rubbing and just plain wear and tear. I recommend that you start mentally preparing yourself with the idea of spraying or fogging your a/c with some form of corrosion inhibitor / preventative such as ACF 50, Corrosion Block or LPS3. It's not a matter of to fog or not to fog........it's a matter of WHEN to fog. Sooner or later you will have to use these products if you expect to keep corrosion under control. Many a/c have gone to the scrape yard because the owners waited until it was to late and did not take corrosion seriously. Priming only delays the use of these products. With all that in mind, while building give some thought as to how you can visually inspect closed up areas of your a/c. Ask yourself how can I look in hear later? How can I fog this area? A small hole is all that's necessary for fogging but a larger hole may be required for inspection. I am not suggesting you should install additional inspection holes with all those nut plates...........just give it some thought. Do not fool yourself into thinking moisture will not get into your wings, tail and fuse. Every time you fly all those chemicals in the air will get into every cavity that is not sealed air tight (there isn't any place on our a/c that should be air tight any way). The moisture / chemicals will condense and start the corrosion process. The cabin is usually a corrosive area due to body sweat.......this is a highly corrosive area on Cessnas. Go look at one and open up the headliner if you don't believe me. Personally on my RV6 I'm etching, alodining and epoxy priming and I will not hesitate to spray ACF50 if any corrosion is spotted later. Yes, the corrosion inhibitor will weep out the seems for a couple of months ........ that means the stuff is working. If your worried about looks....... which looks better an a/c with corrosion inhibitor seeping from the seems or an a/c with a nice paint job grounded due to structural corrosion? It's your call....don't sweat the primer stuff! Greg Bordelon Houston, Texas greg(at)brokersys.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Greg Bordelon <greg(at)brokersys.com>
Subject: Aging rivets & Useless Vari Prime
Date: Jul 08, 1996
AMEN brother Gary! Well said! Greg Bordelon greg(at)brokersys.com ---------- From: aol.com!RV6junkie(at)matronics.com[SMTP:aol.com!RV6junkie(at)matronics.com] Sent: Monday, July 08, 1996 11:21 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: Aging rivets & Useless Vari Prime OH PLEASE, lets not scare everybody (especially all the people that scare easily) with this one again. And that goes for the latest Veri-Prime thing as well. Worry about the important stuff like finding time to finish your plane or where to find an engine. There is so much good information on this list but every now and then I feel that I must interject to help other sort through the BS.... There are plenty of people that used "superannuated" rivets to complete their RV's. My RV took almost 6 years to complete and there are many others that took longer. I didn't replace my rivets every 18 months nor did I give them a shower and a bath or what ever else I have read about. I even drove rivets in 30 degree temps. (oh my). If you want to avoid work hardening your rivets do the following: 1) Don't drive them in one fast blast. Feather the trigger on your gun. 2) Drive them to the correct height the first time. Don't get into the habit of driving them a little and then hitting them with "just a little extra". 3) Use the correct bucking bar. The bigger the better. 4) Take your time and enjoy the project. This will not keep you from work hardening your rivets but it will help you to have some fun. I hope that I can help my fellow listers sort the wheat from the chafe. Gary Corde RV-6 N211GC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Greg Bordelon <greg(at)brokersys.com>
Subject: Aging rivets:
Date: Jul 08, 1996
>Aging Rivets: >On a related matter, I have heard that rivets will age over time and >that "fresh" rivets are best. I'm on the slow-build plan - it has >taken me 18 months to finish up the empennage kit due to other >commitments in my life. So should I avoid mixing my leftover >empennage rivets with the new wing hardware or is this short enough a >period for it not to matter. At the rate I'm going, I figure it will >take 2-3 years to build the wings so this might be a real issue if I >try to use a 4 year old rivet near the end. I have never had a problem driving TWO DECADE old rivets. I guess I should get some "new born" rivets and perform a test. Don't waste your time reasearching all this rivet aging stuff. If a rivet was age limited you can bet the the FAA would have found some way to identify it as such. And yes some rivets are age & and temperature limited...... but an AN470 rivet is an AN470 rivet. Rivet age is not an issue! Now sometimes a soft or softer rivet is needed for attaching non-structual stuff or filling an occasional oversize hole. An AN470 rivet can be made significantly softer by heating them with a torch. Place the rivets to be softened on a can and using your torch heat them up untill the are glowing. You have to keep playing the flame so you don't melt the rivets, their made of aluminum remember. After a minute remove the flame and let them cool. These rivets are now "cosmetic" rivets....i.e. NOT STRUCTUAL. They will be easy to drive with your rivet gun....better test on scrape peices first. These are useful for attaching stuff to fiberglass. Every A&P knows this trick but the hangar door will be closed when this process is in use. Greg Bordelon Houston Texas greg(at)brokersys.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 1996
From: pilla(at)emmanuel.espinc.com (Michael Pilla)
Subject: Hint on adding "shims" to low spots under skins
I just finished riveting the turtle deck on my RV-4 a week ago and thought I would pass along a hint that Jim Perucca, a "lurker" on this list, gave me. Jim is building an RV-4 and is "installing systems". I had one fueslage former, F-408, that wouldn't match very well, for some reason. Well, I bit the bullet and sliced it above the longerons and spliced a couple of doubler plates in; now the fit was almost perfect for the "cone" from the baggage area to the tail. I still had a few low spots requiring 0.032 or so shims. Jim's idea was to cut the shim, drill and dimple it, then apply it to the bulkhead with "hot glue" from those inexpensive glue guns. Of course, by the time you get the shim clecoed on, the glue has "set" and the shim stands a little "proud". Next, Jim told me to apply heat from one of those hot air guns (I had an old Monokote gun around - modelers will know the type I mean.) Well, Jim was right; the clecoe applied just enough pressure so that as the hot glue "re-melted", the shim was pulled down to the bulkhead. Neat! BTW, I had an interesting experience trying to back drill the turtle deck skin to the fuselage top longerons (I had already drilled, countersunk, dimpled the side skin, ...) I had clamped the skin and had 3/4 x 3/4 ballister clamped along the longeron line. I was inside with my air drill, clecoe supply, and clecoe pliers. I am rather broad in the shoulders (can you say "bubba"? :-) But, since, as my wife puts it, "I have ape arms", I figured that I could slide down and use my 36 - 37" sleeve length arms to drill/clecoe, ... Well, it "almost" worked. I was going great guns, feeling a little claustrophobic, kind of like an MRI, when I dropped the clecoe pliers and, without even thinking, reached with my other arm. Of course, I was now wedged, quite tightly, in the tail cone. No one else around, garage door closed because is was after 8:00pm (mosquitos, don't you know). I managed to get out, but found someone *much* smaller who hadn't read Huckleberry Finn and conned him into going in there for the balance... :-) Mike Pilla pilla(at)espinc.com RV-4, #2866 installing VertStab on fuse, canopy frame ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 1996
From: Don McNamara <mcnamara(at)sbt.infi.net>
Subject: Re: New RV-8 Builder
Hi, all... I'm in the process of building my jig for the RV-8 empennage. I'd appreciate any help and words of wisdom from those of you with experience before I screw up my first piece of aluminum! Feel free to e-mail me rather than bore everybody on the list with elementary pointers. Many thanks!! Don McNamara RV-8 Tail Builder mcnamara(at)sbt.infi.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 1996
From: barnhart(at)a.crl.com (Dave Barnhart)
Subject: I'm overhauling my engine
Some folks here might remember a few months ago that I acquired a runout IO320-B1A. I've started the overhaul process, and so I though I would post a status report here as things progress. The engine came out of a twin comanche several years ago at TBO. The owner decided to do the 'counter-rotating props conversion' instead of just overhauling the existing engines. The engine had been overhauled once and had 3800 hours TT on it when I bought it. I essentially bought it 'firewall forward'. So, I not only have an engine, I have all accessories, including the oil cooler. (anybody need a twin comanche motor mount?) The Sump: The IO320-B1A has the mount for the fuel injection servo on the aft face of the sump. I could have had my mount modified, but after talking with Don Wentz, decided it would be easier to locate a different sump. The hard part of that process was figuring out exactly what the Lycoming part number of the correct sump should be. (I think there must be about a zillion sump part numbers.) After figuring out the right part number, it only took 1/2 hour on the phone and $350 to have the sump on its way. Crankshaft: About two weeks ago, i took the engine to an A&P friend's hanger and we tore it down (the engine, not the hanger). Internally, this engine turned out to be exceptionally clean and wear-free. I don't have the crank back yet, but it looks good (hooray!!!!) The crank has never been ground. The front main bearing journal has one small score about 1 thou deep. The score may polish out, but I expect they will need to grind it 3 thou undersized. A quick runout check and magnaflux revealed no problems with the prop flange. The crank is now out at the crank shop, and I expect to hear the final verdict in a few days. Camshaft: The cam and cam followers look GREAT! In fact, people kept coming by, and after seeing the parts, wanted to know what kind of oil was used in this engine (Aeroshell 50, with oil and filter change every 50 hours.) They will go out for grinding and re-nitriding this week. Crankcase: The case showed minor signs of fretting, and has been sent out. It should be back in about three weeks. Oil pump gears: This engine had one steel and one aluminum gear. The gears and shafts really looked great. It's a shame I have to throw them away. Also this is a REALLY OLD engine. The oil pump housing is the old two-part style, and will have to be replaced with the new single-part one. I'm told that Superior now makes oil pump housings. Also, the oil pump has a stationary idler-gear shaft (The gear rotates on the shaft, whereas the new gears have an integral shaft.) The accessory case will therefore need to have an additional oil gallery drilled (This is in a Lycoming service bulletin). It is a simple process, but I decided to let the local engine shop do it. The only noticable wear was on the crankshaft gear. I understand that this normal for Lycomings. Rods: My engine uses the older style rod bolts. The new style have a radius under the head, so a little machining was necessary to make my rods accept the new style bolts. Cylinders: Well, they *Look* real good, but I'll hold off sending them in until I get the bill for what has been done so far. That's it for now. Best Regards, Dave Barnhart barnhart(at)a.crl.com rv-6 sn 23744 finishing kit on order fuselage out of the jig ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Allan W. Mojzisik" <prober(at)iwaynet.net>
Subject: Variprime Warning, Did You Know ...
Date: Jul 08, 1996
------ =_NextPart_000_01BB6D11.589BD5A0 Just a note on all this primer stuff.......Before you get too fancy go = look at your car where the paint has chipped and moisture has gotten = under the paint. (If you have an old enough car) If your talking about = sealing the primer, it is very unlikely that you will be able to seal it = 100% so anywhere that moisture can get to the aluminum (under the = paint/primer) you are going to have a problem big time......I don't know = that much about variprime but I do think you had better think twice = about sealing it in an enclosed area.......I think that is why they used = zinc chromate before and you are only supposed to mist that on not thick = coat it. Just my $.02............Al N162NV (Res) =20 ---------- From: = cpeedy.ENET.dec.com!walsh(at)matronics.com[SMTP:cpeedy.ENET.dec.com!walsh(at)ma= tronics.com] Sent: Monday, July 08, 1996 11:54 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: Variprime Warning, Did You Know ... Variprime...... Other than the Epoxy "Stuff", I don't see that there is any way to = "seal" the inside surfaces without a top coat. So.... What's wrong with = shooting "variseal"?? over the Variprime? Can you shoot it right after? Or do = you have to wait a day or so? =20 Specifically, are there any special procedures necessary for use of = Variseal? Also, did the Chemist indicate that Variprime might make matters worse? Remember the filliform corrosion that the Cessnas suffered. I believe = that the paint they used actually absorbed moisture. The alum would have = been=20 better off not painted at all. John ------ =_NextPart_000_01BB6D11.589BD5A0 eJ8+IiMBAQaQCAAEAAAAAAABAAEAAQeQBgAIAAAA5AQAAAAAAADoAAENgAQAAgAAAAIAAgABBJAG AKQDAAACAAAAFAAAAAMAADAFAAAACwAPDgAAAAACAf8PAQAAAEkAAAAAAAAAgSsfpL6jEBmdbgDd AQ9UAgAAAABydi1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20AU01UUABydi1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20A AAAAHgACMAEAAAAFAAAAU01UUAAAAAAeAAMwAQAAABYAAABydi1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20A AAAeABoAAQAAABQAAABSRVBPUlQuSVBNLk5PVEUuTkRSAEAAMgCASL68Mm27AQMABAwAAAAAAwAF DP////8DABUMAAAAEAMA/g8GAAAAHgABEAEAAABEAAAATm8gdHJhbnNwb3J0IHByb3ZpZGVyIHdh cyBhdmFpbGFibGUgZm9yIGRlbGl2ZXJ5IHRvIHRoaXMgcmVjaXBpZW50LgAeAAEwAQAAABgAAAAn cnYtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tJwACAQswAQAAABsAAABTTVRQOlJWLUxJU1RATUFUUk9OSUNT LkNPTQAAAwAAOQAAAAACARI6AQAAAEkAAAAAAAAAgSsfpL6jEBmdbgDdAQ9UAgAAAABydi1saXN0 QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20AU01UUABydi1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20AAAAAHgATOgEAAAAYAAAA J3J2LWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbScAAgEUOgEAAAAbAAAAU01UUDpSVi1MSVNUQE1BVFJPTklD Uy5DT00AAAsAQDoBAAAAAgH2DwEAAAAEAAAAAAAABQ4AAAADAAAwBgAAAAsADw4BAAAAAgH/DwEA AABJAAAAAAAAAIErH6S+oxAZnW4A3QEPVAIAAAAAcnYtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tAFNNVFAA cnYtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tAAAAAB4AAjABAAAABQAAAFNNVFAAAAAAHgADMAEAAAAWAAAA cnYtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tAAAAHgAaAAEAAAAIAAAASVBNLk5PVEUDABUMAQAAAAMA/g8G AAAAHgABMAEAAAAYAAAAJ3J2LWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbScAAgELMAEAAAAbAAAAU01UUDpS Vi1MSVNUQE1BVFJPTklDUy5DT00AAAMAADkAAAAAAgEUOgEAAAAQAAAA6erY7ADZzxGNKkRFU1QA AAsAQDoBAAAAAgH2DwEAAAAEAAAAAAAABjrJAQiABwAYAAAASVBNLk1pY3Jvc29mdCBNYWlsLk5v dGUAMQgBBIABADEAAABSRTogUlYtTGlzdDogVmFyaXByaW1lIFdhcm5pbmcsIERpZCBZb3UgS25v dyAuLi4AhA8BBYADAA4AAADMBwcACAAVAAUAMgABAC8BAQYABwAYAAAASVBNLk1pY3Jvc29mdCBN YWlsLk5vdGUAMQgBIIADAA4AAADMBwcACAAUADYABAABADEBAQmAAQAhAAAARTlFQUQ4RUMwMEQ5 Q0YxMThEMkE0NDQ1NTM1NDAwMDAAIQcBA5AGAPAGAAATAAAACwAjAAAAAAADACYAAAAAAAsAKQAA AAAAAwA2AAAAAABAADkAoObUxDJtuwEeAHAAAQAAADEAAABSRTogUlYtTGlzdDogVmFyaXByaW1l IFdhcm5pbmcsIERpZCBZb3UgS25vdyAuLi4AAAAAAgFxAAEAAAAWAAAAAbttMkNy7Njq6tkAEc+N KkRFU1QAAAAAHgAeDAEAAAAFAAAAU01UUAAAAAAeAB8MAQAAABMAAABwcm9iZXJAaXdheW5ldC5u ZXQAAAMABhDRFJxOAwAHEL0EAAAeAAgQAQAAAGUAAABKVVNUQU5PVEVPTkFMTFRISVNQUklNRVJT VFVGRkJFRk9SRVlPVUdFVFRPT0ZBTkNZR09MT09LQVRZT1VSQ0FSV0hFUkVUSEVQQUlOVEhBU0NI SVBQRURBTkRNT0lTVFVSRUhBAAAAAAIBCRABAAAAPwUAADsFAADeCAAATFpGdcIZJM7/AAoBDwIV AqgF6wKDAFAC8gkCAGNoCsBzZXQyNwYABsMCgzIDxQIAcHJCcRHic3RlbQKDM3cC5AcTAoB9CoAI zwnZO/EWDzI1NQKACoENsQtg4G5nMTAzFFALChRRRQvyYwBAIEp1E8Ag0GEgbm8T0CACIBsw0mwD IHRoBAAgE1AHcasFwBPAdQ3QLh00Qg3AywWwG5B5CGAgZxHAHBCQb28gZgBwY3keQPMesBWgb2sb MAVAHhEFwPJjCsF3aASQG5AcIBuQfwqwC4AFQBGABCARcAUgcPsJgBswbiIQBGAEABzwHeHPIXIf MAJACfAgdSJAHLHBINcuIChJZh4DEYB+dhuQA5EG8CIQCfAIYGfiaCAiKSAgJNQj8QdA2msLgGcb MAbgdQVAEbCPB0AnkiDTHIMsIGkFQDscQSVgch8QI7AoYGtlfmwfEBwgH7QgYAMQAyBifyVxAmAg sR6wKDIpYhkwMO4lHNAesABweSB2H7Eid58gMAOgHlQgwwdAdW0LgPcvwCSwI70vHHQmoB4SCsC/ G5AfMChzHrAlRBxhbyvROTAQYmkokQdxHTRJIOpkAiAnBUBrG2AH4C3U9nURcCfFdgrABSAcgiuA 9ygBNKIcEm4fkCUEIhArkNcjYSPyN8J0A/BjK6In+u8pchvBA6AJ8GMVoBGwIhH9FhBhHTU0oDj1 KsIcQSBwrSqSZSoBO3J6C4BjIaH/A2IbgSuQHcMiMjHGAiAqgfxzdSHgO2MsES/QGxEqs/cbsRth HBJjH5AFoD0CJJELQ1Ma820fECQuMDIbHTUdM0EDIENTTjE2yDJOVkNRKFIHkCahzyawCoUKiyhg MTgs0AIA4GktMTQ0DfAM0EizXwtZRcAKoANgE9BjBUAtX0rXCodJiwwwSlZGA2E6P0veSlYMgiAg IfAJgHkuoEVORVQuBYEuBaCIbSF3B0BzaEA+0RMDYAMAY3NQgltTTbhUUDpPn1CvUbNdS39fTI0G YAIwTb9Oy00CIGScYXkpUBrwKoEwOClQEDE5OTYssDE6NZo0FLBNVO9MjVRvVy9xTstydi0oYBPA USw7j17fUbNa71X+dWJqSpEPXQ9Oy0ZQZBBSVi1M6yKRZBBWNodXCsADABkQqSlQRGkiEFkeIUs1 MucdMUbfR+MzNklXGkVKVvdmxx00CoVPINEj8gORINJKRUDQeB8QIlMc8iL/KVA0phGwLbVtYhuQ HEEtQdcgYFlALAIiKDIiCoUg0u8LgACQDbBAkXIe0DmAPUHdKXBoJ/IbQB6QcELDQ0HcU28dMmdQ KsEnPUFRYX8nsHOSHNBzwBtwJ5EKhSLzNnJxkz8/G6Ap0SDDZsf5eBAgQwORHhJ2cyliBRDfJkAb IQGABJB4EE8FwDdx/x4RCoUlQywRU6ApcRtAWTFbG6AcwW95UWj8UyHwY38GkDlwG+FZUTICcERw 0nNvfwIsYTNBOYBkIsEEIG77BZAHkHMKwB8QHcE94hug9yTgZsIoMj8KhUUwLRApUPZkaAEg0kMg gEFjC4CEkP8gMBuBKrNmyC/QerIAwCpg/4dhOKI9QQWwEbCDtgqFRlD/B4AG0CPlSIAb8AaQBbAw EH8FoQNgAJAbsW/2eXCCEW7vIYFAoA3QIJFkQ0E0oCuQ/ShgZXyCKsFx6SEUPagA0O8c8H9yJ8Et EHIrkCJYQ0H+VC91iDFZkCIQJUMrkCOB/wqFOIWDACTgQjIhEyICGyHDG/Bo7UpvaG5o/GlvL2p/ SmUKhRUxAJrQAAMAEBAAAAAAAwAREAAAAABAAAcwQHKBIDFtuwFAAAgwQHKBIDFtuwECARQ6AQAA ABAAAADp6tjsANnPEY0qREVTVAAAHgA9AAEAAAAFAAAAUkU6IAAAAAB1Ig== ------ =_NextPart_000_01BB6D11.589BD5A0-- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 1996
From: Patrick Kelley <patk(at)mail.ic.net>
Subject: New web site
Well, I finally got my web site back up and running on my new service, and I added an RV page while I was at it. My home page is http://ic.net/~patk/home.htm and, for those of you too impatient to look at my home page, the RV page is http://ic.net/~patk/rv6a.htm . Enjoy, and let me know what you think. Cheers! PatK ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 1996
From: "Elon Ormsby" <Elon.Ormsby(at)quickmail.llnl.gov>
Subject: Paint advise needed
REGARDING Paint advise needed Scott I am really sorry you are having such a problem. I have never used Randolf paints but I can assure you that theirs is a "system" just like all of the other manufactures. If just one little costitutent of the system is a little wrong the whole process will blow up! Shermin Williams, Dupont they are all the same. Not only is the surface preparation important but the PRECISION of using the components in the "system" is critical. Since you can only remove some of the primer with paint-remover it appears that you have a good, tenacious product. Also, your comment about bare aluminum producing a good finish (more on this later) lends me to believe it may be technique and not product at fault. Mitch Robins remarks are accurate on all accounts. Generally, "orange peel" is caused by the color coat setting up too fast and this can be caused by the following "controllable" variables. (1) Using the WRONG reducer/thinner for the ambient conditions. Usually you are using a reducer that is too HOT for the existing temperature. In other words, if it is a hot day you need a reduced(thinner) that will evaporate much SLOWER to allow time for the color coat to flow or get that wet look. A cold day can use a thinner that is hotter (will evaporate faster) since the color coat will not dry as fast due to the cold. One of the most difficult tasks of getting a good paint job is selecting the CORRECT THINNER for the ambient temperature. If you use a thinner that is too slow you greatly increase the chance of RUNS - If it is too hot you get ORANGE PEEL. (2) Wrong primer. Primers act as an adhesion layer but due to their porosity some are required to have a SEALER COAT on top of the primer so the color coat will "wet". Does the Randolp system require a sealer? (3) Too high of air pressure (or wrong gun) for the "system". Generally high pressure will atomize smaller paint particles. These will NOT "wet" as easily and can produce orange peel. In addition, they accentuate the problem if you have the WRONG thinner (for the temperature) because they will tend to start drying in the air before they even hit the surface. The wrong gun will contribute to the same problem. Contrary to intuition larger droplets will flow (or "wet) when applied. They will also be less critical of the wrong thinner. You stated you got a GOOD FINISH on BARE aluminum which tends to pinpoint to one of the problems above. Since there was no primer it was NOT adsorbed and your color coat "wet" when applied. Any of the three problems mentioned above would prevent good "wetting" of the color coat and will lead to orange peel. When in doubt, always use a slower thinner and risk getting paint runs. Good technique can minimize runs but they can be fixed much better that the problem you are now faced with. -Elon ormsby1(at)llnl.gov ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 1996
From: spjohnsn(at)ix.netcom.com (Stephen Paul Johnson)
Subject: Re: New RV-8 Builder
>I'm in the process of building my jig for the RV-8 empennage. I'd >appreciate any help and words of wisdom from those of you with experience >before I screw up my first piece of aluminum! Feel free to e-mail me >rather than bore everybody on the list with elementary pointers. > >Many thanks!! > >Don McNamara >RV-8 Tail Builder >mcnamara(at)sbt.infi.net > Welcome to the list Don, I will give a VERY brief resume of what I've picked up and found useful, not just for you but for the others who might be lurking out there. 1. The jig is best made from laminated 3/4" plywood or 2x4. 2. I found that I will need to file a bit off the inner ends of the HS-603's to make the holes in the HS609 stiffeners line up just right. Others also report this. 3. The fabrication of HS-810 and HS-814 is tricky. Use a bandsaw. A friend pointed out over the weekend that the holes forming the ears in HS-814 should be started from the back, using a small pilot hole, so that the radius doesn't cause the drill to wander. 4. Order longer sizes of AN426AD rivets. 5. When possible, drill and cleco with #40 even when #30 is called for until the final alignment, then go back and use the #30 moving any holes a small amount as necessary. Steve Johnson RV-8, jig finished tomorow, about to put this good advice to the test. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 1996
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)ltec.net>
Subject: Re: Aging rivets & Useless Vari Prime
nor did I give them >a shower and a bath or what ever else I have read about. >4) Take your time and enjoy the project. This will not keep you from work >hardening your rivets but it will help you to have some fun. > >Gary Corde Gary, WHAT! You mean I didn't have to knit each rivet a bathrobe so they wouldn't catch cold after their baths. If only I'd known:) Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)ltec.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 1996
From: barnhart(at)a.crl.com (Dave Barnhart)
Subject: Re: Engines
>Can I get a bit of info on types of Lycombing engines that are being used. >Good or bad. If they needed to be modified (I'm building one of thoes RV6 >with the traning wheel at the front). I'd like a IO-320-???, but what the >??? is I don't know. Which injector/carb used etc. I'm in the middle of overhauling an IO32-B1A, so I can speak with *some* experience about the IO320. (I assume that you know that the IO320 is fuel injected and the O320 is carburated.) The first thing ya gotta know is that these engines came in two styles: 1. Standard Cylinder Flange (STD), also know as narrow deck engines 2. Wide Cylinder Flange (WCF), also known as wide deck engines. Both will fit. WCF engines are the newer style, and given a choice, you'd prefer a WCF over a STD, but usually you don't get that kind of choice. As to engine and part numbers, I can only speak to the STD style because that is what mine is. The WCF IO320 series is covered by an entirely separate parts manual. The STD O320 and IO320 parts manual shows these IO320 models: IO320-B1A, -B1C, -C1A, -D1A, -D1B and -E2A. TheFollowing eninges all have the fuel injection servo hanging off the aft face of the oil sump. It will never fit in an RV-6A without changing the sump: -B1A, -B1C, and -C1A The following engines have the fuel injection servo mounted on the bottom of the sump (where you need it). -D1B, -E2A Your best bet is to find ANY IO320, and swap out the sump if necessary. When looking at pictures of sumps in the parts manual, the most important thing to look for is the oil pickup tube. SOme engines (mine, for instance) have the oil pickup tube integral to the sump. Others (the newer engines) use a separate oil pickup tube. You cannot exchange one for the other without also exchanging the accessory case. I'm sorry if I've kinda gone on and on about the sump, but I've just worked this problem, and the part number maze is unbelievable. As for the WCF IO320's, I have no idea what the correct part number is. As for the fuel injector itself, I believe that all of them used the Bendix RSA5 unit. IMPORTANT: If you are looking at a fuel injected engine with the idea of buying it, make sure yoiu get the fuel injection servo, fuel distributor, and injectors. That fuel injection servo is worth about $1500. If yours is missing, guess what ya gotta do? The Dec 94 RVator had a good article on engines. Also, included in the Construction Manual are two very helpful items: 1. a list of all Lycoming engine model numbers and the *major* differences between them. 2. a list of engines and the production aircraft they were installed in. I hope this helps. Best Regards, Dave Barnhart barnhart(at)a.crl.com rv-6 sn 23744 finishing kit on order fuselage out of the jig ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 1996
From: barnhart(at)a.crl.com (Dave Barnhart)
Subject: Re: RV3-A wing mods
finnlass(at)ix.netcom.com (Finn Lassen ) wrote: >I'm building an RV3. I understand that Van's will be sending out the >plans and even the needed material when it's ready. I requested the >plans about 2 months ago, but haven't heard back. I suppose they're >not ready yet? As I understand it, there needs to be several variations on the modification kit, dependiong upon how your spars were built and whether or not you have wing tanks. Last I heard, they were completing the design of all the variations before shipping anything out. Best Regards, Dave Barnhart barnhart(at)a.crl.com rv-6 sn 23744 finishing kit on order fuselage out of the jig ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 1996
From: barnhart(at)a.crl.com (Dave Barnhart)
Subject: Re: Full Swiveling Tail Wheel
Rob McAnally mcarob(at)ozemail.com.au wrote: >Has anybody out there had any experience with the full swiveling tail wheel >for the RV-6? >At the time I ordered my kit the new tail wheel was not an option and I was >supplied with the origional unit. >Is the new swiveling unit worth the modification of the origional ? Life will be much easier with a full swivel tailwheel. You can use Van's or the Aviation Products tailwheel. Either one requires a different tailwheel spring. Van's is an improved, less expensive copy of the Aviation Products tailwheel. Best Regards, Dave Barnhart barnhart(at)a.crl.com rv-6 sn 23744 finishing kit on order fuselage out of the jig ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 1996
From: barnhart(at)a.crl.com (Dave Barnhart)
Subject: Re: Spray guns
>2. Make sure you use lacquer thinner, not mineral spirits, for cleaning up > primer. Be thorough. I actually keep two toughup guns around: - AN inexpensive gun for shooting primer - an expensive Binks for shooting topcoats. As much as you clean the gun, you can never get it REALLY clean. Best Regards, Dave Barnhart barnhart(at)a.crl.com rv-6 sn 23744 finishing kit on order fuselage out of the jig ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 1996
From: Patrick Kelley <patk(at)mail.ic.net>
Subject: Re: New web site
Michael Angiulo wrote: > Wow. In an apartment. Amazing. It's the noise thing I can't believe. My neighbors hate it and I work inside a completely enclosed house. Well, there are a few factors. 1st, the apartment building is concrete and cinder block; noise is pretty well contained. 2nd, the neighborhood is on a busy street, and the complex is not exactly quiet. Lastly, I am careful never to rivet during quiet hours. With a little planning, I can do most riveting during the noon to 4 range on a weekend. Using the squeezer does not count against this. Swearing loudly at a cut finger does count as noise . PatK ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 1996
From: Rick Osgood <74774.54(at)CompuServe.COM>
Subject: Engine for Sale
I came across a posting on Compuserve for a O-360 A1E or O360-C1E for sale and called the owner. I wanted to post the info on the engine for all to consider. The engine was in a 96 Scout. TT 13 hours. The oil temp sensor was not seated properly and most of the oil leaked out during a takeoff. The engine was torn down and inspected and it was determined that the crank and rods were damaged and must be replaced. All other pieces are fine. This engine was replaced by a new engine in the Scout and is now for sale. Asking price is $8,000 as is. Includes all accessories including a new carburator. The old one was put on the new engine before he new that a new carb was sent with the new engine. He has a detailed list of items and cost to repair. The current estimated cost to repair is $8,000. The owner believes this is high and could be done for about $5,000. I do not have any affiliation with this person and will not profit from any sale. I pass this info on so any one who needs an engine can follow up and decide if it will work for them. If you would like to talk with the owner his name is: Guy Baldwin Tulsa, OK (918) 299-8485 Hope this works for someone Rick Osgood, 74774.54(at)compuserve.com Now on left wing ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JZidek7003(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 09, 1996
Subject: Re: Banquet at Oshkosh
Put me in for two. John Zidek (913)491-2944 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JZidek7003(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 09, 1996
Subject: Re: Oshkosh
Gary I will be staying in an airconditioned trailer in the Oshkosh camp ground the entire week of this great meeting. If you can't find a better place to stay give me a call. I am building an RV-4 and I am about 4 months away from flying it. I am looking for someone to give me a ride in an RV(tail dragger). Anyone else out there that may be looking for a place to stay, give me a call. Space is limited but who sleeps at Oshkosh anyway. John Zidek KC RV-Avatiors (913) 491-2944 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: n21pe(at)ix.netcom.com (Peter B. Mortensen)
Subject: Re: TOOLS WANTED
You wrote: > Need mostly good used hand >tools.. for a good home..please send list and prices > my >email or 757-867-7244. Thank you. > Stan from Yorktown VA Stan, Please give your e-mail address so we can write to you without bothering the list. I have some used cleco pliers, drill bits and bucking bars. All are used from Boeing Surplus. If you send me a private e-mail with your snail mail address, I will send you a price list. Peter Mortensen n21pe(at)ix.nectom.com _______________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au (Geoff Brown)
Subject: Long range fuel tanks
Hi there,anyone have any ideas on long range fuel tanks? I'm building an RV6 and am after an extra hour or 2 in fuel. I'll probably end up with the tip tanks like Jon Johanson (extra 30 litres per side) but I'd like to hear from anyone who has put extra tanks in. Ta Geoff Brown geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au Geoff Brown geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au (Geoff Brown)
Subject: landing light position
I'm on the wings of my RV6 and wondering about where to put the landing light, wing or nose cowl,(like the Piper Cherokee). Any ideas??? Thanks Geoff Brown geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au Geoff Brown geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au (Geoff Brown)
Subject: plastic coatings on skins
Hi I'm having trouble getting the plastic protective coating and glue off some of my wing skins. A friend of mine is also having trouble so I assume its a common problem. I've tried kerosene, methylated spirits, petrol, soap, alumiprep and several others but the glue is very stubborn. If anyone else knows the problem, and more to the point, knows the cure, I'd love to hear from them Thanks Geoff Brown geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au Geoff Brown geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rust47rg(at)one.net
Date: Jul 09, 1996
Subject: Re: Engine for Sale
>The engine was in a 96 Scout. TT 13 hours. The oil temp sensor was not seated >properly and most of the oil leaked out during a takeoff. The engine was torn >down and inspected and it was determined that the crank and rods were damaged >and must be replaced. All other pieces are fine. This engine was replaced by a >new engine in the Scout and is now for sale. > >Asking price is $8,000 as is. Includes all accessories including a new >carburator. The old one was put on the new engine before he new that a new carb >was sent with the new engine. > >He has a detailed list of items and cost to repair. The current estimated cost >to repair is $8,000. The owner believes this is high and could be done for >about $5,000. > Price the crank before you jump on this one. Even if you could rebuild it for 5000 that means you have 13 large in it. For a few more you can buy a new one from Van that has a warranty and hasn't been hurt! Don't discount the warranty. In 2 years of flying I've had 2 warranty claims on my 360 and have had no problems from Lycoming even after 12 months. I have a claim on one of the original light weight starters right now and I've been flying for 2 years. Everybody wants to badmouth the Factory but I've found them to be fair. Regards: Rusty Gossard N47RG RV-4 Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: Scott Gesele <scottg(at)villagenet.com>
Subject: Re: I'm overhauling my engine
>Cylinders: >Well, they *Look* real good, but I'll hold off sending them in until I get >the bill for what has been done so far. > >That's it for now. > >Best Regards, > >Dave Barnhart >barnhart(at)a.crl.com >rv-6 sn 23744 >finishing kit on order >fuselage out of the jig > > > > Dave, When all is said and done, I'd be curious to know what the final (overall) cost came to. Even though I already have my engine, it could help others with the new / overhauled decision. -Scott N506RV (Installing cowl) scottg(at)villagenet.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: Scott Gesele <scottg(at)villagenet.com>
Subject: Re: Engine for Sale
>Asking price is $8,000 as is. Includes all accessories including a new >carburator. The old one was put on the new engine before he new that a new carb >was sent with the new engine. > >He has a detailed list of items and cost to repair. The current estimated cost >to repair is $8,000. The owner believes this is high and could be done for >about $5,000. > >I do not have any affiliation with this person and will not profit from any >sale. I pass this info on so any one who needs an engine can follow up and >decide if it will work for them. > >If you would like to talk with the owner his name is: Guy Baldwin > Tulsa, OK > (918) 299-8485 > >Hope this works for someone > >Rick Osgood, >74774.54(at)compuserve.com >Now on left wing > > Let's see, $8,000 core + $8,000 rebuilding cost (the seller's estimate) = $16,000. This will get you an engine that HAS BEEN involved in an incident (after considerable work rebuilding). I just spent $17,000 for a fresh from the factory, brand spanking new O-320 from Van's. Now I don't feel so bad spending all that money on the engine :) BTW, a new O-320 sitting in it's box is a real pretty sight. -Scott N506RV scottg(at)villagenet.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: Scott Gesele <scottg(at)villagenet.com>
Subject: Re: landing light position
>I'm on the wings of my RV6 and wondering about where to put the landing >light, wing or nose cowl,(like the Piper Cherokee). Any ideas??? > >Thanks > >Geoff Brown >geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au > >Geoff Brown >geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au > > > > Geoff, I installed the Duck Works landing light in the left wing leading edge. The kit is very well laid out, easy to install and looks good. I've never had a problem seeing a runway a night, then again the project hasn't left the garage yet :) -Scott N506RV (installing the cowl) scottg(at)villagenet.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: david_fried(at)smtpgwy.dehavilland.ca
Date: Jul 09, 1996
Subject: Re: Long range fuel tanks
What would happen if you bought an extra tank skin, split it and spliced it to the ends of your existing tank skins. There is a potential for up to 50% increase in capacity. You would need some material for the splice, so maybe 40%. I haven't given this splice idea much thought, you might be better off making your own leading edge skins. I bent all of my leading edges without too much trouble. A new tank baffle, some ribs and the forward spar web would also be required. The web could probably be modified if the spar is unassembled. Spanwise distribution of mass reduces wing bending moment for a given wing loading. Roll inertia increases but this aircraft certainly has enough lateral control power. Obviously you must watch the gross weight. Van can probably supply you with an approval to increase this somewhat (~1750 lb.). The standard tank skins are 4 feet wide. I built longer tanks to replace volume lost due to the taper in my wing. The total volume is something like 20 USG each side. David Fried DF-6 C-____ dfried(at)dehavilland.ca ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: RV-List: Long range fuel tanks Date: 7/9/96 10:34 AM Hi there,anyone have any ideas on long range fuel tanks? I'm building an RV6 and am after an extra hour or 2 in fuel. I'll probably end up with the tip tanks like Jon Johanson (extra 30 litres per side) but I'd like to hear from anyone who has put extra tanks in. Ta Geoff Brown geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au Geoff Brown geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: Phil Arter <arter(at)ncar.ucar.edu>
Subject: Re: Rudder bottom fairing
Mike, You are right, it does leave a step. I have considered fabbing an additional skin to wrap around the counterbalance and build it up to the same level as the rudder skin, but haven't decided if it is worth the effort (the elevators would also need the same treatment). Problem is I don't have any material long enough. An interesting thing is that, on the elevators the small "joggles" in the tip ribs and spars are missing, which means the skins can't lay flat at that intersection because of the thickness of the counterbalance wraparound skin. I happened to have some "joggling" pliers and added joggles so they are like the rudder. I plan clamp these strips on the inside and drill them at the same time as the skin/rib. I'm sure they don't go between the rib and skin. I have a rudder bottom and the edges are square cut unlike all the other tips are that fit inside the skins. They probably need to be ground down a bit on the inside so they are the right thickness to come out flush with the skin. Phil arter(at)ncar.ucar.edu >I'm currently building my 8 rudder and have some questions. First off, at >the top of the rudder there is a counterbalance skin which, if I'm correct, >portrudes from beneath the rudder skin to wrap the top most rib (the >counterweight is on the top). Is that right? It looks like this leaves a >little "step" between the foreward most edge of the rudder skin and the >counterbalance strip. > >The other question has to do with the method for attaching the rudder bottom >fairing. The plans show a strip which is attached to the bottom rib (on the >inside? Sandwiched between the skin and the rib flange?). As far as I >could see the manual made no mention or explanation of when to install this >strip, whether to use the same rivet holes that the skin/rib were using, or >to just use some others. > >This is all compounded with the fact that I don't have my rudder bottom yet >(backordered) so I can't test fit it to see what's going on. I don't want >to rivet the whole rudder together to later find out I had to install those >strips between the rib and skin. > >Can someone please explain how these are attached? I used to have the >Orndorff tapes, but some guy got my name & address from VAN's when he was >picking up his kit, he came over to my house to watch me work, and >"borrowed" my tapes (and a dozen clecos) before disappearing. > >Any help would be appreciated (in either locating this guy who stole my >tapes or in explaining how to finish the top & bottom of the rudder) > >Thanks, >-Mike > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WStucklen(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 09, 1996
Subject: Re: RV Forum Fulton NY
Would somebody please tell me what format these attached files are in. I get them as rvlistrv.dat. What application software is used to view them???????????? Fred Stucklen RV-6A N925RV wstucklen(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Greg Bordelon <greg(at)brokersys.com>
Subject: plastic coatings on skins
Date: Jul 09, 1996
The stuff your using is not strong enough evidently. MEK, Acetone or Lacquer Thinner will work. The Lacquer Thinner may work best. Wear some chemical resistance gloves and a breathing apparatus......this stuff can hurt you long term! Hi I'm having trouble getting the plastic protective coating and glue off some of my wing skins. A friend of mine is also having trouble so I assume its a common problem. I've tried kerosene, methylated spirits, petrol, soap, alumiprep and several others but the glue is very stubborn. If anyone else knows the problem, and more to the point, knows the cure, I'd love to hear from them Thanks Geoff Brown geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Greg Bordelon <greg(at)brokersys.com>
Subject: Long range fuel tanks
Date: Jul 09, 1996
>Hi there,anyone have any ideas on long range fuel tanks? I'm building an >RV6 and am after an extra hour or 2 in fuel. I'll probably end up with the >tip tanks like Jon Johanson (extra 30 litres per side) but I'd like to hear >from anyone who has put extra tanks in. >Geoff Brown >geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au I too have been interested in this idea. I think someone on the list mentioned extending the fuel tank out towards the tip by incorporating the next rib bay into the tank. This will probably require a new tank skin, extra ribs and a modified web of some kind. That should give the O360 that extra bit of fuel. I like this idea instead of the additional tanks method and the associated tank management duties. Extending the rib bay helps me keep with the KISS method. Any body out there with experience on this? Greg Bordelon greg(at)brokersys.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: "A. Reichert" <reichera(at)clark.net>
Subject: Re: RV Forum Fulton NY
Can you send this in ASCII format, please? - Alan On Tue, 9 Jul 1996 baldcom.net!mailman(at)matronics.com wrote: [NON-Text Body part not included] ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: Ted French <french(at)computime.bc.ca>
Subject: Grand Rapids Technologies engine monitor
The engine monitor which is sold by Grand Rapids Technologies is a very good unit with which I have had good success. However, there is a potential problem with the tach hook-up instructions. The instructions say to use a 10K resistor when connecting to the p-lead for magneto sensing. I am aware of at least 3 people who have had problems with this. The symptom is the tach reading is very erratic at all RPM's. The fix is to use a 39k resistor instead. There is also a new software revision available which will give two AUX inputs instead of one. The trade-off is that the temperature choices are now fixed at two cyl head temps, and two exh gas sensors. I have not recieved my revised software yet so don't know what other changes ther are. Ted French RV-6A flying with 5hrs on it. Prince George BC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: gil(at)rassp.hac.com (Gil Alexander)
Subject: Re: Engines
*** big snip *** >Your best bet is to find ANY IO320, and swap out the sump if necessary. >When looking at pictures of sumps in the parts manual, the most important >thing to look for is the oil pickup tube. SOme engines (mine, for >instance) have the oil pickup tube integral to the sump. Others (the newer >engines) use a separate oil pickup tube. You cannot exchange one for the >other without also exchanging the accessory case. NOTE: this info. for O-320 WCF models - probably OK for others, but check it carefully first! I am starting the process of converting an O-320-E2G into a -E2D (the aft mounted carb of the -E2G hits the -6A nose gear leg while the -E2D has a mid-mounted carb), and came across the oil pick-up variation problem mentioned above. According to the guys at Ly-Con in Visalia, this pick-up variation is not a big deal if you are rebuilding. A exchange sump cost $300 from them. The sump with the integral pickup tube _will_ mate with the accessory cases listed in the O-320 WCF manual. The seperate pickup tube is removed, and a blanking plate needs to be fabricated to cover the machined area it was bolted to. The integral pickup in the sump will now feed oil to the case if the blanking plug is removed from the bottom of the case oil gallery where it mates to the sump (easy to see, hard to describe ...:^) The same gaskets - with the pick up hole present - are used for both sumps. Though not usually done, I think the reverse swap would also work. In this case, the oil gallery plug would be installed, and the boss machined to accept the seperate, bolt-on oil pick-up tube. According to the WCF parts manual pictures, all of the cases have this mounting boss, it's just not machined if it's not needed. Apparently, due to the number of -6As being built, the swap from aft-mounted to mid-mounted carb is the most popular, and is reflected in the cost of the replacement sump .... :^( Please note, these are only preliminary findings, and I will do a full write-up of the sump conversion when I have completed the engine rebuild (in about 9 - 12 months, I hope ...:^) I just needed to remount the carb now to proceed with engine installation .... then it gets a rebuild. .. hope this helps .... Gil Alexander ... almost completed the new "wing storage facility", then back to canopies. gil(at)rassp.hac.com RV6A, #20701, N64GA (rsvd) > >I'm sorry if I've kinda gone on and on about the sump, but I've just worked >this problem, and the part number maze is unbelievable. > > >Best Regards, > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: patk(at)mail.ic.net (Patrick Kelley)
Subject: Re: Rudder bottom fairing
>The other question has to do with the method for attaching the rudder bottom >fairing. The plans show a strip which is attached to the bottom rib (on the >inside? Sandwiched between the skin and the rib flange?). As far as I >could see the manual made no mention or explanation of when to install this >strip, whether to use the same rivet holes that the skin/rib were using, or >to just use some others. Assuming that they are like the RV-6 arrangement, they go inside the rib, not between the rib and skin. I used the same holes. This merely leaves you with a tab used to attach the rudder bottom. The rudder bottom fairing has no joggle or flange to fit into the rudder; it just ends flush at the skin. Sorry for the late reply, somehow I missed this not when you posted it and only saw it through Phil's reply. PatK - RV-6A - Left wing getting skinned. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: plastic coatings on skins
Use a heat gun or hair dryer to heat up the plastic and it will peel right off. Randall Henderson, RV-6 Editor, Home Wing Newsletter http://www.edt.com/homewing randall(at)edt.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: david riehl <driehl(at)cycor.ca>
Subject: Re: Long range fuel tanks
Greg Bordelon wrote: > > > >Hi there,anyone have any ideas on long range fuel tanks? I'm building an > >RV6 and am after an extra hour or 2 in fuel. I'll probably end up with the > >tip tanks like Jon Johanson (extra 30 litres per side) but I'd like to > hear > >from anyone who has put extra tanks in. > >Geoff Brown > >geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au > > I too have been interested in this idea. I think someone on the list > mentioned extending the fuel tank out towards the tip by incorporating the > next rib bay into the tank. This will probably require a new tank skin, > extra ribs and a modified web of some kind. That should give the O360 that > extra bit of fuel. I like this idea instead of the additional tanks method > and the associated tank management duties. Extending the rib bay helps me > keep with the KISS method. Any body out there with experience on this? > > Greg Bordelon > greg(at)brokersys.com My guess is that Vans RV-8 tank skins should be larger when they become available. For now though John Harmon supplies larger tank skins for the Rocket II that will fit. His tanks are 76 litres ( 16.75 Imp Gal ) ( 20 US Gal ) each. Rear baffle extensions are also available. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: john henley <j.henley(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: rv6 fuselage bulkhead alignment
I guess it is time for me to request some help. In building my RV6, I am using the FJ instructions. when I check alignment of my rear bulkheads by running strings between F-606 and F-612, I cannot get F-610 to align with the other bulkheads. There is a gap of approx. 3/16 on each side. I cannot move it aft because of it being a HS attach bulkhead. I have repeatedly checked the fore-aft spacing and it is correct. It appears that the bulkhead may have been manuf. too narrow but I can't find the dimensions on the plans. Has anyone else had a similar problem? Help appreciated. John Henley j.henley(at)worldnet.att.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: "Richard E Steffens" <resteffe(at)dpcmail.dukepower.com>
Subject: Plastic skin coverings
Removing plastic skin coverings Blow a little heat on them - like from one of those kerosene heaters or a 'big' hair dryer. I didn't have any trouble, but during the winter when I had the torpedo kerosene heater going, I let it blow a bit on the skins and the plastic came off real easy. Dick Steffens resteffe(at)dpcmail.dukepower.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: Dr John Cocker <jcocker(at)interhop.net>
Subject: Alternators
I am at the stage where I need to fit an alternator. They seem to be either very expensive, or they are the El-Cheapo ones for cars. There is an alternator shop nearby which has reconditioned ones, the Japanese types are $110, they may be reconditioned, or they may just have black paint sprayed on the outside. I would appreciate some guidelines. John Cocker. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: Bob Japundza <bob(at)holli.com>
Subject: Re: Long range fuel tanks
Greg Bordelon wrote: > > > >Hi there,anyone have any ideas on long range fuel tanks? I'm building an > >RV6 and am after an extra hour or 2 in fuel. I'll probably end up with the > >tip tanks like Jon Johanson (extra 30 litres per side) but I'd like to > hear > >from anyone who has put extra tanks in. > >Geoff Brown > >geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au > > I too have been interested in this idea. I think someone on the list > mentioned extending the fuel tank out towards the tip by incorporating the > next rib bay into the tank. This will probably require a new tank skin, > extra ribs and a modified web of some kind. That should give the O360 that > extra bit of fuel. I like this idea instead of the additional tanks method > and the associated tank management duties. Extending the rib bay helps me > keep with the KISS method. Any body out there with experience on this? > > Greg Bordelon > greg(at)brokersys.com Greg, The Harom Rocket II has this arrangement--the fuel tank skins are extended one more rib outward for a couple of gallons extra fuel-- I don't think it is vey much. The spar is also modified so that there is extra flange length on the front side so the extended fuel tank has something to mount on to. Bob Japundza RV-6 canopy being fitted ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Angiulo <mikeang(at)MICROSOFT.com>
Subject: Rudder bottom fairing
Date: Jul 09, 1996
I spoke with Tom at Van's and he said that the counterbalance skin on the elevator does get sandwiched between the skin and rib, that there will be a step and a resulting crease, and to just deal with it. He said if you want to get carried away you can bevel the edge of the counterbalance skin and make sure that the edge falls in between two rivet holes to minimize the crease. I don't like that answer so I'm going to fabricate a shim to run the rest of the length of the elevator tip ribs (towards the elevator TE) to cause the skin to lie flush. I don't have joggling pliers, nor do I see how you can create a joggle across the two webs of the back to back tip ribs. -Mike Building left elevator ---------- From: owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com[SMTP:owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com] on behalf of Phil Arter Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 1996 9:14 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: Rudder bottom fairing Mike, You are right, it does leave a step. I have considered fabbing an additional skin to wrap around the counterbalance and build it up to the same level as the rudder skin, but haven't decided if it is worth the effort (the elevators would also need the same treatment). Problem is I don't have any material long enough. An interesting thing is that, on the elevators the small "joggles" in the tip ribs and spars are missing, which means the skins can't lay flat at that intersection because of the thickness of the counterbalance wraparound skin. I happened to have some "joggling" pliers and added joggles so they are like the rudder. I plan clamp these strips on the inside and drill them at the same time as the skin/rib. I'm sure they don't go between the rib and skin. I have a rudder bottom and the edges are square cut unlike all the other tips are that fit inside the skins. They probably need to be ground down a bit on the inside so they are the right thickness to come out flush with the skin. Phil arter(at)ncar.ucar.edu >I'm currently building my 8 rudder and have some questions. First off, at >the top of the rudder there is a counterbalance skin which, if I'm correct, >portrudes from beneath the rudder skin to wrap the top most rib (the >counterweight is on the top). Is that right? It looks like this leaves a >little "step" between the foreward most edge of the rudder skin and the >counterbalance strip. > >The other question has to do with the method for attaching the rudder bottom >fairing. The plans show a strip which is attached to the bottom rib (on the >inside? Sandwiched between the skin and the rib flange?). As far as I >could see the manual made no mention or explanation of when to install this >strip, whether to use the same rivet holes that the skin/rib were using, or >to just use some others. > >This is all compounded with the fact that I don't have my rudder bottom yet >(backordered) so I can't test fit it to see what's going on. I don't want >to rivet the whole rudder together to later find out I had to install those >strips between the rib and skin. > >Can someone please explain how these are attached? I used to have the >Orndorff tapes, but some guy got my name & address from VAN's when he was >picking up his kit, he came over to my house to watch me work, and >"borrowed" my tapes (and a dozen clecos) before disappearing. > >Any help would be appreciated (in either locating this guy who stole my >tapes or in explaining how to finish the top & bottom of the rudder) > >Thanks, >-Mike > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: Phil Arter <arter(at)ncar.ucar.edu>
Subject: ACF-50
Anybody ever used ACF-50 during assembly and tried to paint the exterior afterwards, or is it like silicone spray? Phil arter(at)ncar.ucar.edu ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: Harold Sutphin <hsutphin(at)magicnet.net>
Subject: Re: plastic coatings on skins
Just a general comment to the RV listers, some of you are aware that there are search engines set up for ALL of the past RV list postings, some folks are new and have not used them. Try one before you post a question - it really works quite well and the plus is that you get your answer instantly. Try this search engine next time you have an RV question. As an example for the query below you could search on the word "plastic" and find it in the subject line on your first try (along with a lot of other hits). It cuts down on list traffic. So much to read so little time...since we have grown so large!! http://dunkin.Princeton.EDU/.rvlist/ Harold RV-6A //wing kit arriving this week...please// > Hi > I'm having trouble getting the plastic protective coating and glue off some > of my wing skins. A friend of mine is also having trouble so I assume its a > common problem. I've tried kerosene, methylated spirits, petrol, soap, > alumiprep and several others but the glue is very stubborn. > If anyone else knows the problem, and more to the point, knows the cure, > I'd love to hear from them > Thanks > > Geoff Brown > geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Terryg(at)SceptreCal.CCMAIL.CompuServe.COM
Date: Jul 09, 1996
Subject: VS Tip Attach (Long)
'Listers -- a couple of weeks back, I posed a question on the subject of attaching the fibreglass tip to a vertical stabilizer -- at least one where the flange had been trimmed by a quarter of an inch too much (oops)...although very belated, here's a short summary of the answers...at the very end I have put some thoughts as to what I think I'm going to do at this point...thanx to all that replied! Cheers...TCG ****** One of my fellow Canucks on the East Coast, Joe Hine, suggested... "Glue it on with proseal. You have to heat it and expand it a bit so it is a tight fit in the top of the VS. I masked the top of the VS and a line about 1/8 inch up the tip from the line the top of the VS would make and then spread proseal on the fiberglass and pressed it in place. I then took a popsical stick and make a nice neat bead of proseal at the joint, using the excess that squeezed out. Looks good, no rivits, the proseal takes paint ok. I just hope I never have to take it off." ****** Joe then followed up with... "Just to clarify a little I do have four rivits in mine that I put there just for a peace of mind thing, but I would just glue it now. I have since glued the vent for fresh air to the fus. side with proseal and it cannot be moved. I would have no problem with gluing the tips now. Having said that, its not an easy job. As I said you have to get them to the right shape so they stay in place by friction before you apply the proseal." ****** Greg Bordelon suggested... "I think in this case I'd just glue the tip on and glass it in. I'm not a fan of glass stuff to aluminum but I think in this case that would be the ideal fix. Just drill a couple of holes to cleco the thing together while the glue cures.You could also just glue a block of foam to the VS and make a new glassed in tip.....this may be redundant as you already have a tip. OR you could drill our the tip rivets and re-rivet back together with a new strip flange on the inside of rib flange. This new flange would extend past your skin and the fiberglass tip would slip over it. Anyhow, I'm going to put antenna/strobe/lights and stuff in the tips. I really don't think your going to like that strobe in the VS tip. I'd glass it in!" ****** Eric Henson suggested... "After talking to some guru types they have assured me its no big deal. If your cuts are like mine when you try to line up the caps the bottom edges might not extend far enough (my cuts ended up angled, front is fine, the back is down to 1/4 of an inch) so I am glassing some extensions to the bottoms that will also have alum. strips backing. Everyone tells me rivets are not needed so I will epoxy my caps on and back up with a couple of pops per side ( as Frank J. says I'm a nervous type). Sounds like you on the other hand want yours removable, I did at first too and chewed on this a great deal. I figured I would do the glass extensions as above. Then pop (symetrically of course) through the tip rib itself instead of through the skin. The cosmetics would of course depend on properly altering the rib or (gulp) building one from scratch that would be a custom fit. Yuck. Structurally I don't think it's a problem." ****** My own thinking at the time was... "1) The rivets attaching the VS tip are shown a 1/4" back from the top of the VS. I can still do that with mine, although I'll end up nicking the edge of the flange of the tip rib. Also, I'll have to modify the flange a little on the tip itself. 2) I can attach a nut plate behind each of the two tooling holes in the tip rib, and again, with a few minor changes to the tip itself, screw the tip on with two bolts into these nutplates. I'll have to make sure that they can seal though, so that they don't permit water to enter the VS." ****** And here's what I think I'll do... I'll have to admit that I've basically been staring at this problem for the last month, and haven't made much physical progress, although I think I have solved the problem and know what I'll do. It's a variation on my plan to put a couple of plate nuts behind the tooling holes. In fact, I think what I'll do is put a *single* plat nut behind the aft tooling hole in the tip rib, sized for a quarter inch bolt. I'll build up a little structure inside the tip that will support a countersink for the bolt (which will probably be nylon). At the front of the tip, I will fashion some arrangement of hooks. To attach the tip. you'll set it in place, and then push it forward to engage these hooks, and then insert and tighten the bolt at the back. The intention is to have a tip that's removable, with one bolt. I will trim the flange on the fibreglass a little to clear the flanges on the tip rib inside the skin. I very much liked the idea of Prosealing the thing on and forgetting about it, but I've still got this idea that there's going to be an antenna or light up there, and the removable arrangement seems to better suit that possibility. Hope this helps, folks...cheers... Terry in Calgary S/N 24414 "The Empennage Stiffener King" ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: rv6 fuselage bulkhead alignment
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: "Calin Brabandt" <cwbraban(at)ichips.intel.com>
John Henley laments: > I cannot get F-610 to align with > the other bulkheads. There is a gap of approx. 3/16 on each side. I cannot > move it aft because of it being a HS attach bulkhead. I have repeatedly > checked the fore-aft > spacing and it is correct. It appears that the bulkhead may have been manuf. > too narrow but I can't find the dimensions on the plans. Has anyone else had > a similar problem? Help appreciated. John, Before you commit this bulkhead to a permanent position, it would be good to check where your h-stab front spar attach angle hits. This dimension (and the ones that affect where your v-stab to h-stab spar splice plate falls) often don't work out quite right and the splice plate junction often requires shims or a taller splice plate. If you're lucky, you may be able to move the bulkhead aft, still get the bolts through the h-stab attach angles with enough edge distance and at least reduce the side shims under the skin to something less than 3/16". Cal ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: chester razer <crazer(at)egyptian.net>
Subject: Re: rv6 fuselage bulkhead alignment
john henley wrote: > > I guess it is time for me to request some help. In building my RV6, I am > using the FJ instructions. when I check alignment of my rear bulkheads by > running strings between F-606 and F-612, I cannot get F-610 to align with > the other bulkheads. There is a gap of approx. 3/16 on each side. I cannot > move it aft because of it being a HS attach bulkhead. I have repeatedly > checked the fore-aft > spacing and it is correct. It appears that the bulkhead may have been manuf. > too narrow but I can't find the dimensions on the plans. Has anyone else had > a similar problem? Help appreciated. > > John Henley > j.henley(at)worldnet.att.net Yes, I had exactly the same problem, The fix is to center the bulkhead and after the skin is drilled go back and insert individual shims or shim strips. I riveted my strips in place but I read on the list where some guys have been hot gluing them in place until final riveting chet: fuse out of jig ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: Re: rv6 fuselage bulkhead alignment
... > when I check alignment of my rear bulkheads by > running strings between F-606 and F-612, I cannot get F-610 to align with > the other bulkheads I posted this a month or two ago, not sure whether it made it to the list though.... ---- This is an issue that I came up against, and although the answer is still somewhat ambiguous, I went through an interesting process, and found out some things about this very issue that you probably want to consider. On the bulkhead fabrication drawing (my old one, I didn't get a new one either), at some point there was a revision to widen the F-607 and F-608 bulkheads by 1/8" per side, or 1/4" overall. Local lore had it that this was done on purpose "so the skins would lie better". When I got my fuselage all jigged up I found that there was a bulge in the longerons because of this widening. I decided to call Vans and confirm that this was indeed supposed to be there, since nothing was said about it in the manual, and in fact the longeron curve profile on dwg #22 specifically shows the longeron being "straight aft of this point". Tom and Bill both told me no, the longerons are supposed to be straight, the revision was because previously the bulkheads were too narrow. Not being satisfied with this, I did the geometry and found that mathematically, using the dimensions prior to the revision, and at the station lines called out, the bulkhead sides would all have formed a straight line. The extra 1/8" per side added in the revision would add a bulge, and you'd have to move the station lines to make them straight again. I pointed this out to Vans (they really hate it when you do that) but they were still not convinced, and told me if I had to change the station lines to make them straight, then do so. This seemed REALLY wierd to me -- if I had to move the station lines BECAUSE of the revision, then why the revision in the first place, and why not move the station lines at the same time as the widening of the bulkheads? As a reality check I looked at four other RV-6s under construction in the area, and ALL of them had this bulge. So I decided to track down the "lore" that said they were SUPPOSED to bulge. I finally found that it originally came from Art Chard, who as we all know used to build prototypes for Vans. Art told me that yes, a side effect of the way the tailcone skins are rolled is that there is a slight curve to the skins perpindicular to the bottom "curl", and that the bulge was added so as to offset the tendency of the skins to oil-can. He also said that aerodynamically, an 1/8" bulge should be insignificant. So according to Art Chard, there is SUPPOSED to be a 1/8" bulge per side between the F-606 and F-610. I went back to Vans with this, and they finally conceeded that there may have been a revision such as this that no one remembered the reason for, but they also said that they went out and laid a straightedge up against the factory demonstrators, which were all built by Art Chard, and they couldn't detect any bulge. Go figure. So I left the bulge in. I did end up widening the next aft bukhead by 1/16" (F-610) to remove a slight "fishtail" flairing at that point. Now when you sight down it you can see a slight curve, but otherwise it's undetectable. My skins lie nice and smooth, and there appears to be no oil canning. Bottom line is, I really don't know if it helped or not, but at least it didn't hurt anything. Randall Henderson, RV-6 Editor, Home Wing Newsletter http://www.edt.com/homewing randall(at)edt.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: rv6 fuselage bulkhead alignment
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: "Sam Ray" <str(at)almaden.ibm.com>
> I guess it is time for me to request some help. In building my RV6, I am >using the FJ instructions. when I check alignment of my rear bulkheads by >running strings between F-606 and F-612, I cannot get F-610 to align with >the other bulkheads. There is a gap of approx. 3/16 on each side. I cannot >move it aft because of it being a HS attach bulkhead. I have repeatedly >checked the fore-aft >spacing and it is correct. It appears that the bulkhead may have been manuf. >too narrow but I can't find the dimensions on the plans. Has anyone else had >a similar problem? Help appreciated. I know of another builder who had the same problem; he split the bulkhead and spliced the two halves to fit. His fuselage skins look smooth. Sam Ray ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: Bob Haan <bobh(at)synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: plastic coatings on skins
Heating up the plastic protective coating makes it much easier to remove. >Hi >I'm having trouble getting the plastic protective coating and glue off some >of my wing skins. A friend of mine is also having trouble so I assume its a >common problem. I've tried kerosene, methylated spirits, petrol, soap, >alumiprep and several others but the glue is very stubborn. >If anyone else knows the problem, and more to the point, knows the cure, >I'd love to hear from them >Thanks > >Geoff Brown >geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au > >Geoff Brown >geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au Bob Haan Portland, OR RV6-A 2 wings in the jigs, LEs, Top Skins, Tanks, Ailerons, Flaps done bobh(at)synopsys.com Evenings 503-636-3550 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)ltec.net>
Subject: Re: rv6 fuselage bulkhead alignment
> I guess it is time for me to request some help. In building my RV6, I am >using the FJ instructions. when I check alignment of my rear bulkheads by >running strings between F-606 and F-612, I cannot get F-610 to align with >the other bulkheads. There is a gap of approx. 3/16 on each side. I cannot >move it aft because of it being a HS attach bulkhead. I have repeatedly >checked the fore-aft >spacing and it is correct. It appears that the bulkhead may have been manuf. >too narrow but I can't find the dimensions on the plans. Has anyone else had >a similar problem? Help appreciated. >John Henley John, I had the same problem when I built my fuse several years ago. I ended up cutting the bulhead so that the top would fit flush with the top of the fuselage and riveted on doublers per AC 43.13 to close the gap. It seems that some builders have bulkheads that fit perfectly and others have to do modifications. There may be differences in form blocks or maybe it's just the way things turn out. Anyway, while frustrating, it's an easy fix. Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)ltec.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: EBundy2620(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 09, 1996
Subject: Re: Alternators
<< I am at the stage where I need to fit an alternator. They seem to be either very expensive, or they are the El-Cheapo ones for cars. There is an alternator shop nearby which has reconditioned ones, the Japanese types are $110, they may be reconditioned, or they may just have black paint sprayed on the outside. >> I opted for the one from Van's. It's $140, and comes with really nice machined, anodized aluminum mounting brakets. The unit is a rebuilt and looks really nice. I haven't flown it yet, so who knows? Ed Bundy ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com
Date: Jul 09, 1996
Subject: Re: landing light position
>I'm on the wings of my RV6 and wondering about where to put the landing >light, wing or nose cowl,(like the Piper Cherokee). Any ideas??? > >Thanks > >Geoff Brown >geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au > >Geoff Brown >geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au > > > > Most RV's I have seen use the wing, either the outer bay or wingtip. Don Wentz has a nice lightweight, easy to install kit which goes in the last bay. I saw a wingtip model at Chief a couple of weeks ago made for a 6. Ross Mickey rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GHLX34A(at)prodigy.com (MR GEORGE T KILISHEK)
Date: Jul 09, 1996
Subject: Re: RV-List:Empennage/HS Ribs
Tripp: I'm at just that stage now on my RV-8, and here's what I'm about to do: (1) Place a single rivet in the center of the HS-404 flange, trimmed as per the plans. (2) Fabricate a second flange for the rear of the HS-404, with a single rivet tothe spar. (3) After aligning, drilling and clecoing all of this lashup, remove the HS-404 and rivet the rear flange to the spar. (4) After the skin is rivetted to the center rib and front spar, attach the HS-404 to the auxiliary flange with three pop rivets. (5) Rivet the front flange of the HS-404 just like God intended, only using a single rivet. George Kilishek Getting ready to skin HS. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 1996
From: kingm(at)whidbey.net (Monte King)
Subject: Long range fuel tanks
Mark Myres installed two 5 gallon header tanks in front of the 688 subpanel on his -6. He installed a single filler spout on the top front fuselage skin. It worked just great and kept the weight as far forward as is possible. He'll be at Oshkosh for anyone that wants to look them over. Monte King RV-6A > >>Hi there,anyone have any ideas on long range fuel tanks? I'm building an >>RV6 and am after an extra hour or 2 in fuel. I'll probably end up with the >>tip tanks like Jon Johanson (extra 30 litres per side) but I'd like to >hear >>from anyone who has put extra tanks in. >>Geoff Brown >>geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au > >I too have been interested in this idea. I think someone on the list >mentioned extending the fuel tank out towards the tip by incorporating the >next rib bay into the tank. This will probably require a new tank skin, >extra ribs and a modified web of some kind. That should give the O360 that >extra bit of fuel. I like this idea instead of the additional tanks method >and the associated tank management duties. Extending the rib bay helps me >keep with the KISS method. Any body out there with experience on this? > >Greg Bordelon >greg(at)brokersys.com > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 1996
From: Frank Smidler <smidler(at)dcwi.com>
Subject: Re: plastic coatings on skins
Geoff Brown wrote: > > Hi > I'm having trouble getting the plastic protective coating and glue off some > of my wing skins. A friend of mine is also having trouble so I assume its a > common problem. I've tried kerosene, methylated spirits, petrol, soap, > alumiprep and several others but the glue is very stubborn. > If anyone else knows the problem, and more to the point, knows the cure, > I'd love to hear from them > Thanks > > Geoff Brown > geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au > > Geoff Brown > geoffbro(at)ozemail.com.au Try using your hair dryer on them. I heard of this solution after I already fought the problem and know how difficult it can be. Frank Smidler ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 1996
From: Frank Smidler <smidler(at)dcwi.com>
Subject: Tim the Tool Man Taylor syndrom
With great difficulty I am writing this because I just got back from a late night trip to the emergency room and my right hand is still numb from getting three stiches in the middle finger (now I have a reason to hold it up). Leason to be learned.... deburred and rounded edges of alum sheet (used scotch bright on them) can still put a nasty gash in ones finger if you run it by fast enough. But on a more possitve note, I did get the flap weldment mounted. Frank Smidler Looking for that $200 garage sale O-360. N96FS (reserved) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 1996
From: n21pe(at)ix.netcom.com (Peter B. Mortensen)
Subject: Re: Tim the Tool Man Taylor syndrom
You wrote: > >With great difficulty I am writing this because I just got back from a >late night trip to the emergency room and my right hand is still numb >from getting three stiches in the middle finger (now I have a reason to >hold it up). Leason to be learned.... deburred and rounded edges of >alum sheet (used scotch bright on them) can still put a nasty gash in >ones finger if you run it by fast enough. But on a more possitve note, >I did get the flap weldment mounted. > >Frank Smidler >Looking for that $200 garage sale O-360. >N96FS (reserved) > Frank, you are obviously not deburring adequately. I use sandpaper on all edges until they are completely smooth. There is not a single edge or corner on my plane one could hurt oneself on. I hope your finger heels quickly. Also, if you live anywhere near NY or LA, be very careful how you orient that sick finger or you may get hurt even worse. Peter Mortensen. n21pe(at)ix.netcom.com ___________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WStucklen(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 10, 1996
Subject: Re: Alternators
<< I am at the stage where I need to fit an alternator. They seem to be either very expensive, or they are the El-Cheapo ones for cars. There is an alternator shop nearby which has reconditioned ones, the Japanese types are $110, they may be reconditioned, or they may just have black paint sprayed on the outside. I would appreciate some guidelines. John Cocker. >> John: I have an 60 Amp automotive alternator in my RV-6A. It does not have the regulator built into it. The only drawback that I have found is that the fiels wire is connected with a plastic plug instead of the screw/nut arrangement on an aircraft quality unit. The draw back to the plastic plug is that it can, and has, come loose. The solution is to use hi temp RTV to "rubber band" it in place....... Fred Stucklen RV-6A N925RV wstucklen(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 1996
From: Scott Gesele <scottg(at)villagenet.com>
Subject: Re: Alternators
> >I opted for the one from Van's. It's $140, and comes with really nice >machined, anodized aluminum mounting brakets. The unit is a rebuilt and >looks really nice. I haven't flown it yet, so who knows? > >Ed Bundy > Ed, When you installed the alternator, did you need to put additional spacers between the adjustment arm and engine case. Mine did not want to line up unless I added about 4-5 washers. Otherwise the installation went smoothly. Did you notice the cost of those anodized mounting brackets? About $50 for the alternator to case bracket. Oh well, they do look good and probably required a bunch of work to manufacture. -Scott N506RV scottg(at)villagenet.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Chief Aircraft
Date: Jul 10, 1996
From: Jack Abell <abell(at)rand.org>
Could someone please supply me with an address or phone number for Chief Aircraft? Many thanks. Jack Abell RV-6A N333JA (Reserved) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 1996
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)ltec.net>
Subject: Re: Tim the Tool Man Taylor syndrom
>>hold it up). Leason to be learned.... deburred and rounded edges of >>alum sheet (used scotch bright on them) can still put a nasty gash in >>ones finger if you run it by fast enough. But on a more possitve >note, >>I did get the flap weldment mounted. >>Frank Smidler >Frank, you are obviously not deburring adequately. I use sandpaper on >all edges until they are completely smooth. There is not a single edge >or corner on my plane one could hurt oneself on. >I hope your finger heels quickly. Also, if you live anywhere near NY >or LA, be very careful how you orient that sick finger or you may get >hurt even worse. >Peter Mortensen. n21pe(at)ix.netcom.com The double edged "V" deburring tool that Avery sells does a good job of deburring and is much faster than Scotch brite, files or sandpaper. Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)ltec.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 1996
From: Dan Boudro <dboudro(at)nmia.com>
Subject: Re: Alternators
I bought the mounting bracket kit from Van's (it had a chunk of al that you cut the arm out of) and two steel brackets used for engine mounts. I then went down to the local auto electric store and bought a GM alternator. I browsed through the book looking for one that might fit. The newer ones are smaller and lighter than older ones. I choose one, it happened to be a 100 amp but looked ok. When I got it home I found I still had to modify the cowl to get it to fit but that's life. Put a bubble in the cowl, hung the alternator (internal regulator) and things have been fine so far. I've never seen it put out more than 14 amps immediately after startup, it usually runs between 2-5 amps during flight. I have a digital volt/amp meter connected through the alternator lead (EI from Van's). It shows about 14.1V when the engine is on and about 12.1 when the alt is not running. I've got a 35amp sealed lead batt (Concord). So far, so good with 54 hours and climbing fast! I use a piece of fuseable link between the alternator and master relay to protect stuff. I'm a electrical engineer that works on computers but my degree was in power. This stuff isn't rocket science but I know if your unfamiliar with it, it could seem scary. There's lots of ways to get this done, I choose what seemed to be the simplest for me. :-) Dan Boudro RV-4 N9167Z Albuquerque, NM dboudro(at)nmia.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: EBundy2620(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 10, 1996
Subject: Voltage regulators
Does anyone have any thoughts on voltage regulators? I don't know much about them, but I was wondering what the difference is between the unit Van's sells at $36 and the one I can buy at the local auto parts store for $13. Are there differences in regulators or are they all about the same? Thanks Ed Bundy ebundy2620(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: EBundy2620(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 10, 1996
Subject: Fuel Valve
I thought I'd post this in case anyone's interested. I never felt real comfortable about the way the fuel valve (at least on the 6) operates. It has a little tiny "pointer" that points at the port in use and a big "handle" to operate it. Unfortunately, all of the aircraft I've ever flown (Cessnas and Mooneys primarily) have a "pointer" that looks like the handle on the 6 valve. I had visions of switching to the right tank (via the pointer) but thinking it was the left tank (as it would be on most factory-iron). So after much head-scratching, a simple fix dawned on me. I ground off the pointer on the valve, and plumbed the ports backwards (left port to right tank and vice-versa). Voila! Now what I consider to be the real pointer (the fat handle) points to the correct tank. My apologies if this was obvious (or not a problem) to everyone else... Ed Bundy ebundy2620(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 1996
From: inet(at)intellisys.net (brian whatcott)
Subject: Re: VS Tip Attach (Long)
/// > In fact, I think what I'll do is put a >*single* plat nut behind the aft tooling hole in the tip rib, sized for a >quarter inch bolt. I'll build up a little structure inside the tip that will >support a countersink for the bolt (which will probably be nylon). At the front >of the tip, I will fashion some arrangement of hooks... //// >Terry in Calgary >S/N 24414 >"The Empennage Stiffener King" > > A QUARTER inch bolt? I reached for the keyboard immediately. That's what Rolls-Royce have hung COMPLETE engines from! -Then I saw the nylon bolt idea, and cooled right down... brian ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6junkie(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 10, 1996
Subject: Re: Alternators
The import alternator's work great. I have a unit that I got from Mark Landoll (not for the faint at heart) that work's great. One friend has a Honda 55 amp that works great as well. Another friend has a B&C unit which looks great - and is small and light - but they are expensive. The best thing you can do to increase the life of your alternator is to have a blast tube on it. Depending on the pully on your fly wheel, you may need to change the pully on the alternator. I think that there are two size pullys on Lycoming flywheels, 7 & 9 inches. The larger pullys require the change on the alternator. PS A word about Landoll's stuff. Marks workmanship is bad...at best. However, with that said I am using his alternator bracket and starter bracket (that's the components that he manufacturers. The alternater is a Ford/Mazda truck unit and the starter is from a Datsun 280ZX or 810). As bad as his components look, they work great. Factor in that they're cheep and they are good buys. Once you mount these units you can't see the brackets anyway. Gary Corde RV-6 N211GC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6junkie(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 10, 1996
Subject: Re: ACF-50
Don't use ACF-50 until after the aircraft is finished and painted. That stuff will find its way into and through everything. There is a good chance that it will cause a problem when you paint because it never really dries. But then again, if you give your plane a good wash it shouldn't matter...but why chance it. If you store your parts in a dry place there is no reason to fog 'em anyway. That stuff is great. I wish that I knew about it when I was building my RV because I would have NEVER wasted my time priming alclad Alumnium. Gary Corde RV-6 N211GC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 1996
From: Edward Cole <emcole(at)cris.com>
Subject: Re: Chief Aircraft
Jack Abell wrote: > > Could someone please supply me with an address or phone number for Chief > Aircraft? > > Many thanks. > > Jack Abell > RV-6A N333JA (Reserved)Jack, Chief Aircraft 1-800-447-3408 fax 1-541-479-4431 email chief(at)magick.net 1301 Brookside Blvd. Grants Pass, OR 97526 Ed Cole ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 1996
From: ammeterj(at)seanet.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Re: Fuel Valve
>I thought I'd post this in case anyone's interested. > > > >So after much head-scratching, a simple fix dawned on me. I ground off the >pointer on the valve, and plumbed the ports backwards (left port to right >tank and vice-versa). Voila! Now what I consider to be the real pointer >(the fat handle) points to the correct tank. > > >Ed Bundy >ebundy2620(at)aol.com > > Ed, Be REAL SURE that if anyone other than you flys the airplane that they are told about this modification. I know that I'd be really unhappy if I had taken your aircraft for a jaunt and ran out of gas because the valve was pointing in the wrong direction. John Ammeter ammeterj(at)seanet.com 3233 NE 95th St Seattle WA, 98115 USA RV-6 N16JA Flying 5 years ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DougPage(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 10, 1996
Subject: Modifying 0-360s to fit RV-6A
I just bought a used O-360F1A6 which allegedly came out of a Cessna 172RG, knowing full well that it did not have the straight riser sump which is needed on my tricycle nose gear. However, a Lycoming Tech Rep was very helpful to me, and he gave me permission to put his phone number on the RV list. He is also an EAA member. His name is Bob Ohnmeiss, Phone 1-717-327-7127. He gave me the Lycoming part numbers which I would need to convert my engine to a straight riser sump: Straight Riser Sump #78915 Pipes (4) #70485 Clamps (2) #73346 4 Hoses #69603 Sump Gasket #LW15353 Bob also recommended that I get carburetor part #10-5193. I found a used Straight Riser Sump, Pipes and Clamps for $750. I can apparently turn in my 10-5235 carburetor for $400 credit so that Aircraft Spruce's rebuilt #10-5193 will cost me another $749. I found that used 0-360s with a straight riser sump were very hard to come by, so it may be that others can find a different 0-360 and convert it as I am doing. A new straight riser sump costs $1273 from the local Lycoming dealer. My converted engine cannot be certified, but for my experimental purposes, that is ok. By the way, if you may want a constant speed prop, do not get a solid crank engine. Th'e conversion costs then become prohibitive. I am just taking my fuselage out of the jig, so I am a long way from flying this engine and proving that all of the above works satisfactorily. Also, I am a novice pilot. I just got my PPASEL yesterday at age 71. So Beware. dougpage(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 1996
From: inet(at)intellisys.net (brian whatcott)
Subject: Re: Alternators
> I use a piece of fuseable link between >the alternator and master relay to protect stuff. I'm a electrical >engineer that works on computers but my degree was in power. /// >Dan Boudro >RV-4 N9167Z >Albuquerque, NM >dboudro(at)nmia.com > The fuse link - was it regular fuse link cable like used in cars? Can you tell us how to determine the fuse load? Is there a color-code? How do you splice it? thanks brian ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 1996
From: inet(at)intellisys.net (brian whatcott)
Subject: Re: Alternators
>...A word about Landoll's stuff. >Marks workmanship is bad...at best. However, with that said I am using his >alternator bracket and starter bracket (that's the components that he >manufacturers. //// >Gary Corde >RV-6 N211GC > > Ouch! If there are no sharp notches or deep scratches on bends so much the better. A loose generator is an uncomfortable thought if you're into electronic ignition or electric fuel pumps.... brian whatcott Altus ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 1996
From: bcon(at)ix.netcom.com (Robert M. Cornacchia )
Subject: Re: Chief Aircraft
You wrote: > > >Could someone please supply me with an address or phone number for Chief >Aircraft? > >Many thanks. > >Jack Abell >RV-6A N333JA (Reserved) > Hi Jack, Chief Aircraft Inc. Grants Pass Airport 1301 Brookside Boulevard Grants Pass, OR 97526 1-800-447-3408 Open Monday - Friday 6:00 am to 6:00 pm PT Sat. 9:00am to 4:00pm Pacific Time Goodbye, Bob ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 1996
From: Don McNamara <fang(at)sbt.infi.net>
Subject: Re: RV-8 assistance
Thanks for the welcome! I've received many helpful hints and have found much useful, if confusing, information on this list and elsewhere online. I've read much about three sources of building reference: Van's manuals (supplied with the kits), Frank Justice's manual for the RV-6A (online), and the Orndorff(sp?) tapes. Some questions: 1) Is anyone compiling a reference manual similar to FJ's for the RV-8? 2) Is anyone out there done with the videos and want to sell them? 3) Will they be coming out with videos specifically for the -8, thus making question #2 irrelevant? My jig's done, it's square, it's empty. I'm trying to glean as much info as possible before I start sticking pieces together. I think this is just a variation on a theme...buck fever. Don McNamara Granger, IN mcnamara(at)sbt.infi.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 1996
From: n21pe(at)ix.netcom.com (Peter B. Mortensen)
Subject: Re: Tim the Tool Man Taylor syndrom
You wrote: > >>>hold it up). Leason to be learned.... deburred and rounded edges of >>>alum sheet (used scotch bright on them) can still put a nasty gash in >>>ones finger if you run it by fast enough. But on a more possitve >>note, >>>I did get the flap weldment mounted. >>>Frank Smidler >>Frank, you are obviously not deburring adequately. I use sandpaper on >>all edges until they are completely smooth. There is not a single edge >>or corner on my plane one could hurt oneself on. >>I hope your finger heels quickly. Also, if you live anywhere near NY >>or LA, be very careful how you orient that sick finger or you may get >>hurt even worse. >>Peter Mortensen. n21pe(at)ix.netcom.com > >The double edged "V" deburring tool that Avery sells does a good job of >deburring and is much faster than Scotch brite, files or sandpaper. Bob >Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)ltec.net The V tool is just the starting point for me. After that I sand it round and smooth. Peter n21pe(at)ix.netcom.com ___________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 1996
From: n21pe(at)ix.netcom.com (Peter B. Mortensen)
Subject: Re: Modifying 0-360s to fit RV-6A
You wrote: > >I just bought a used O-360F1A6 which allegedly came out of a Cessna 172RG, >knowing full well that it did not have the straight riser sump which is >needed on my tricycle nose gear. However, a Lycoming Tech Rep was very >helpful to me, and he gave me permission to put his phone number on the RV >list. He is also an EAA member. His name is Bob Ohnmeiss, Phone >1-717-327-7127. He gave me the Lycoming part numbers which I would need to >convert my engine to a straight riser sump: >Straight Riser Sump #78915 >Pipes (4) #70485 >Clamps (2) #73346 >4 Hoses #69603 >Sump Gasket #LW15353 >Bob also recommended that I get carburetor part #10-5193. I found a used >Straight Riser Sump, Pipes and Clamps for $750. I can apparently turn in my >10-5235 carburetor for $400 credit so that Aircraft Spruce's rebuilt #10-5193 >will cost me another $749. I found that used 0-360s with a straight riser >sump were very hard to come by, so it may be that others can find a different >0-360 and convert it as I am doing. A new straight riser sump costs $1273 >from the local Lycoming dealer. My converted engine cannot be certified, but >for my experimental purposes, that is ok. By the way, if you may want a >constant speed prop, do not get a solid crank engine. Th'e conversion costs >then become prohibitive. I am just taking my fuselage out of the jig, so I >am a long way from flying this engine and proving that all of the above works >satisfactorily. Also, I am a novice pilot. I just got my PPASEL yesterday >at age 71. So Beware. >dougpage(at)aol.com Doug, you might be able to get a cheaper exchanged rebuilt carburator from Precision Airmotive Corp. in Everett, Washington. They rebuild all Marvel Schebler carburators and probably did the Aircraft Spruce unit before they marked up the price. Peter M. n21pe(at)ix.netcom.com __________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: timpresl(at)sprynet.com
Date: Jul 10, 1996
Subject: Re: RV-8 assistance
Don, I,m 2 1/2 years into an RV-4 with 1 to go. (Just started finish kit last week) As far as I know there are no tapes on the 8, Van's is just now getting the wing kit together for sale. The tapes are not conected to Van's, Orendorf is an individual builder. However I have the 6/6A tapes and they have been helpful to my project. If your jig is ready you wasteing time,start putting metal together and meet the project head on,ask questions as they come up, you will do great! The sooner you start the sooner you fly! I'll help if I can drop a not if you like. X in Texas ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 1996
From: n21pe(at)ix.netcom.com (Peter B. Mortensen)
Subject: Re: Fuel Valve
You wrote: > >I thought I'd post this in case anyone's interested. > >I never felt real comfortable about the way the fuel valve (at least on the >6) operates. It has a little tiny "pointer" that points at the port in use >and a big "handle" to operate it. Unfortunately, all of the aircraft I've >ever flown (Cessnas and Mooneys primarily) have a "pointer" that looks like >the handle on the 6 valve. > >I had visions of switching to the right tank (via the pointer) but thinking >it was the left tank (as it would be on most factory-iron). > >So after much head-scratching, a simple fix dawned on me. I ground off the >pointer on the valve, and plumbed the ports backwards (left port to right >tank and vice-versa). Voila! Now what I consider to be the real pointer >(the fat handle) points to the correct tank. > >My apologies if this was obvious (or not a problem) to everyone else... > >Ed Bundy >ebundy2620(at)aol.com Ed, I have been wrestling with exactly the same problem with my fuel valve on the RV-4 I am building. Then I saw how my RV-6 buddy, Ervin Luke, did his. He painted a bright red stripe where the pointer was and also on the legend which showed what it pointed to. The older valves, of which I have one, are even worse since there is an even smaller pointer on them. Another problem I have had related to what has already been mentioned on the list which is that the 90 degree fittings never screw in to the point where they point in the right direction. I analyzed this phenomenon and found that every 90 degree fitting ends up in a different place in any given port of the valve (i.e. the fittings are not all threaded the same). Knowing this I decided to simply buy a big bag of 90 degree fittings at my local airplane parts shop and try them all until I found the ones that worked for me. Guess what; those fittings are Mil Spec and are $5 each!! Plan B: I went to my local hardware store and bought a $4.75 pipe tap. It is a bottom tap but I ground even more off the tip. I haven't tried this yet but I plan to tap each hole in the valve a little more until the 90 fitting threads in the correct amount. Peter Mortensen n21pe(at)ix.netcom.com _____________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Peter Bennett" <bennett(at)healey.com.au>
Date: Jul 11, 1996
Subject: Re: Voltage regulators
Ed, you should have realised why by now. Aviation volts, like everything else in aviation, need much more regulation to to protect the public, This regulation costs, hence the higher price. Peter Bennett Sydney Australia RV6 engine on order. > Does anyone have any thoughts on voltage regulators? I don't know much about > them, but I was wondering what the difference is between the unit Van's sells > at $36 and the one I can buy at the local auto parts store for $13. > > Are there differences in regulators or are they all about the same? > > Thanks > Ed Bundy > ebundy2620(at)aol.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Maynard, Bryon" <maynardb(at)snowmass.ksc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: Engines
Date: Jul 11, 1996
Hooray I just did this. I replaced my O-320-A1A sump with a O-320-E2A sump and intake stacks. I also used a blanking plate on the external oil line and removed the plug at the accessory case. Worked out great. ---------- From: rassp.hac.com!gil(at)matronics.com Subject: Re: RV-List: Engines Date: Tuesday, July 09, 1996 16:08 *** big snip *** >Your best bet is to find ANY IO320, and swap out the sump if necessary. >When looking at pictures of sumps in the parts manual, the most important >thing to look for is the oil pickup tube. SOme engines (mine, for >instance) have the oil pickup tube integral to the sump. Others (the newer >engines) use a separate oil pickup tube. You cannot exchange one for the >other without also exchanging the accessory case. NOTE: this info. for O-320 WCF models - probably OK for others, but check it carefully first! I am starting the process of converting an O-320-E2G into a -E2D (the aft mounted carb of the -E2G hits the -6A nose gear leg while the -E2D has a mid-mounted carb), and came across the oil pick-up variation problem mentioned above. According to the guys at Ly-Con in Visalia, this pick-up variation is not a big deal if you are rebuilding. A exchange sump cost $300 from them. The sump with the integral pickup tube _will_ mate with the accessory cases listed in the O-320 WCF manual. The seperate pickup tube is removed, and a blanking plate needs to be fabricated to cover the machined area it was bolted to. The integral pickup in the sump will now feed oil to the case if the blanking plug is removed from the bottom of the case oil gallery where it mates to the sump (easy to see, hard to describe ...:^) The same gaskets - with the pick up hole present - are used for both sumps. Though not usually done, I think the reverse swap would also work. In this case, the oil gallery plug would be installed, and the boss machined to accept the seperate, bolt-on oil pick-up tube. According to the WCF parts manual pictures, all of the cases have this mounting boss, it's just not machined if it's not needed. Apparently, due to the number of -6As being built, the swap from aft-mounted to mid-mounted carb is the most popular, and is reflected in the cost of the replacement sump .... :^( Please note, these are only preliminary findings, and I will do a full write-up of the sump conversion when I have completed the engine rebuild (in about 9 - 12 months, I hope ...:^) I just needed to remount the carb now to proceed with engine installation .... then it gets a rebuild. .. hope this helps .... Gil Alexander ... almost completed the new "wing storage facility", then back to canopies. gil(at)rassp.hac.com RV6A, #20701, N64GA (rsvd) > >I'm sorry if I've kinda gone on and on about the sump, but I've just worked >this problem, and the part number maze is unbelievable. > > >Best Regards, > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: OrndorffG(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 11, 1996
Subject: Re: Alternators
John, You need to have a good electrical system starting with the alternator and voltage regulator. The best on the market for the money comes from B&C Spec. phone number(316)283-8662 ask for Bill. He knows his stuff.....George Orndorff ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 11, 1996
From: John Darby <johnd@our-town.com>
Subject: Re: Fuel Valve
>>pointer on the valve, and plumbed the ports backwards (left port to right >>tank and vice-versa). Voila! Now what I consider to be the real pointer >>(the fat handle) points to the correct tank. Ed; I've learned something else about the difference in civilian and military flying. For me (ex military) the short end of the fuel selector is the pointer end of the selector handle (T-6, P-51, C-47 etc). I had no idea that civilian is different. Good thing I didn't do anything that required fuel selection when I got my bi an review. By the way, there is a piper fuel selector valve that I've found to be much better than Vans sold in the past (he may have changed now). The piper valve is the same size, 3 ports (inlet, left and right, no requirement to plug a fourth outlet), has a plastic insert that makes it operate smoothly, a very positive click into place. I rooted around in the FBO's junk box and found a handle that has the flat spot at 90 degrees rather than under the nose (short end). Now when the short end (pointer to me) is 45 degrees to the left of forward, it's feeding the left tank, 45 to rt is rt tank. I had gone through two of Vans valves, they were very hard to operate even after fuel grease was applied,almost no click into place, plus both of them started to leak after a few months. I'm much more pleased with Mr. Pipers valve. Been over a year, operates great, very positive click into place, is directional (well, to us ex military it is), and hasn't leaked nor seeped. It cost me 20.00 at the FBO. What it is suppose to sell for, I don't know. John D John Darby RV6 N61764 flying johnd@our-town.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: OrndorffG(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 11, 1996
Subject: Re: RV-8 assistance
Don, The video for the RV8 is in the works and will be completed soon , watch the list and the RVator for when it is ready.....George Orndorff ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DougPage(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 11, 1996
Subject: Stolen 0-360A2G
In April, I bought a used 0-360A2G from Wentworth, which Steve Wentworth had converted with a straight riser sump so that it would fit an RV-6A. In early May the shipping company phoned me saying the engine would be delivered the next day. It has never been delivered to this day. The carrier says that the engine was stolen in Dublin California (25 miles from Oakland) where the delivery truck was parked overnight. Since I paid by Visa, I have cancelled the charge and Steve Wentworth has filed a claim with the carrier for the loss. Meanwhile I found and have bought another engine. Meanwhile, there is a hot engine out there somewhere, serial #L-12656-36A, with a straight riser sump. I have the logs. BEWARE. Doug Page ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 11, 1996
From: "A. Reichert" <reichera(at)clark.net>
Subject: Was: Modifying 0-360s to fit RV-6A
On Wed, 10 Jul 1996 aol.com!DougPage(at)matronics.com wrote: [...] > satisfactorily. Also, I am a novice pilot. I just got my PPASEL yesterday > at age 71. So Beware. Congratulations! :-) - Alan ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 11, 1996
From: <Jim=Preston%303FS_DOT%Whiteman(at)szl.afres.af.mil> (Maj, 305FS/DOT, Whiteman
AFB, 975-2968)
Subject: Re: Alternators
charset=US-ASCII George O... Are you and Becky all moved in now? Working on your RV-8 tapes yet? What's the best way to get the -6 tapes...from you directly, from Avery, or from Van's? Jim ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 11, 1996
From: BDStobbe <70743.2727(at)CompuServe.COM>
Subject: Decoder; RV Forum
Hi Guys, For those of you who are having trouble decoding the RV Forum message which was recently sent, following is a decoded version. It's not perfect since it was apparently originally done in MS Word and that's how the unaltered decoded file should be viewed for optimum results... BTW, until today I wasn't able to decode these ASCII files either. However, I searched a local BBS and found a nice decoder called mimefile.exe (shareware) that you may want to try; it can encode and decode non-ASCII type files for sending via E-mail. I downloaded it from Creative Edge BBS in CT at 203-791-8532 (it's compressed in ZIP format and is called mimefile.zip). Hope this helps... BDStobbe RV-6 N508RV (reserved) ================================================================================= ===== EAA Chapter 486 Stamp Dale Buller, Chairman Here 1996 Northeast RV Builders' Forum 113 Belle Terrace N Syracuse, New York, 13212-3824 Address Label Here NORTHEAST RV FORUM Please read and respond Immediately!! *** Welcome to the Second Annual Northeast RV Builders Forum. See the photos and write-up (pages 88 and 89) in the April 1996 issue of "Sport Aviation" for complete information on the First Forum. Again, we need to know (as soon as possible) our facility requirements and if the attendance supports an extra-ordinary effort (the more that come the more we are likely to do). If you are 90% sure that you will attend, REFOLD and SEND this page IMMEDIATELY. Share the fun bring a builder, friend, spouse! Please indicate threshold level Yourself / Friend of interest (such as "wings") _____________ / _____________ Will you be ( )driving, ( )flying [RV( )], ( )other ______? Likely to arrive (_______________:00): Fri ( ), Sat( ), Sun ( ). Preferred lodging: Chapter member's home( ), hotel( ), camping( ). Will you want a ride in an RV ( )y/( )n? If you are flying in an RV, would you give rides to builders ( )y/( )n? We will provide ride gas. We want to thank all those that gave rides last year! Some speakers will be repeats of last year and some will be new. Note: Registration fee waived for lecturers/presenters! and Free lodging with Chapter members for lecturers/presenters! If you would care to make a presentation, please indicate area(s) of expertise, etc. ______________, your 'phone ___:_______ *** ********** * * * Thanks * * * ********** EAA Chapter 486 1996 Northeast RV Builders' Forum Dale Buller, Chairman 113 Belle Terrace N Syracuse, New York 13212-3824 Rev. 2 (7/7/96) 1996 Northeast RV BUILDERS' FORUM (and FlyIn Breakfast) Oswego County Airport, Fulton, New York Dale Buller, Chairman 315:451-1304 If you are considering an RV Project, have one in progress, or have completed one, this may be the FORUM for you. The intent is to build your knowledge and confidence with the hope of increasing your productivity and quality or - share what you have learned -all while having fun. Most of our speakers/presenters will be experienced builders who have already "been there, done that". Friday Evening (Sept. 6) RV Welcome Cook Out and 486 Chapter Meeting Saturday Forum (and Flying) September 7, 1996 Note: Program subject to change. Flying may be limited by weather (and aircraft available). 8:00 Breakfast, Continental 1:00 Wiring, advanced 9:00 Riveting: Empennage, Wings, 2:00 Forward of firewall 10:00 Fuselage 3:00 Painting 11:00 Wiring, basic 4:00 FIRST Flight 12:00 Lunch 5:00 FAA's advice to builders 7:00 Builders' Award Banquet Sunday (Sept. 8) FlyIn Breakfast (Breakfast free for Pilots of RV's flown in.) ******* 1996 Northeast RV Builders Forum REGISTRATION ******* * (Forum & Meals on Saturday.) * * Make Check payable to: EAA Chapter 486 RV Forum. * * Due: August 15, 1996 - $30 before 16th/ $35 after * * * * For lodging information or reservation to stay with * * Chapter Members (nominal donation to Chapter - $10 per * * person per night) call 315:___-____. Ground transportation * * provided. Aircraft Rides - Donation (toward gas, etc.) * * * * Mail to: EAA Chapter 486 RV Forum * * Dale Buller, Chairman * * 113 Belle Terrace * * N Syracuse, New York 13212-3824 * Rev 2 (7/7/96)* * ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 11, 1996
From: Chris Ruble <cruble(at)cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Stolen 0-360A2G
If you haven't already done so, this should be posted to every usenet aviation group. Chris > > In April, I bought a used 0-360A2G from Wentworth, which Steve Wentworth had > converted with a straight riser sump so that it would fit an RV-6A. In early > May the shipping company phoned me saying the engine would be delivered the > next day. It has never been delivered to this day. The carrier says that > the engine was stolen in Dublin California (25 miles from Oakland) where the > delivery truck was parked overnight. Since I paid by Visa, I have cancelled > the charge and Steve Wentworth has filed a claim with the carrier for the > loss. Meanwhile I found and have bought another engine. Meanwhile, there is > a hot engine out there somewhere, serial #L-12656-36A, with a straight riser > sump. I have the logs. BEWARE. Doug Page > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6junkie(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 11, 1996
Subject: Re: Voltage regulators
I used a Ford transister unit and it works fine. I did buy an over-voltage "crow bar" from B&C (about $20) however. This unit is attached to the FIELD breaker and if it sees more than a present amount of voltage it will trip the 5 amp field breaker. B&C sells a VR with over-voltage protection built in to it but at about $200 it was a little rich for me. I accomplished the same thing for about $40. Gary Corde RV-6 N211GC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Newman" <bn(at)poseidon.crosslink.net>
Date: Jul 11, 1996
Subject: Lycoming factory OH - best prices
Anybody have recent experience on who offers the best deals on Lycoming factory overhauled engines? Airpower is the big advertiser, but is theirs the best price? Bob Newman bn(at)crosslink.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 11, 1996
From: pilla(at)emmanuel.espinc.com (Michael Pilla)
Subject: Looking for Tracy Cooke (sp?) of Florida
Claudio Tonini, RV4 "Purple Passion", asked me to see if anyone on the list knows the phone number of Tracy Cooke, of Florida. I'm not sure of the spelling. Claudio left the message on my office voice-mail and it was a little difficult to understand the message. Thanks. BTW, an update on Claudio's RV-3: he is skinning both wings (fuel tanks are finished), boy, is he fast. He came to my shop all upset about the dimpled holes in his fuel tanks and skins - the 3/32 size. Seems that the holes were too large and his "bucker" was having trouble keeping the shop head straight, ... Turns out that Claudio's "Brand X" 3/32 dimple dies (not sure of the source, but *not* Avery or Cleveland) was forcing the hole opening to be just about 10 thousandths larger in diameter than my holes (Avery dimple die set.) We dimpled some scrap using my dies and his and there was no question; the Avery dimple dies were clearly superior. Fortunately, I had a spare set and Claudio has borrowed the set and is proceeding; and, yes, we checked the new set - virtually identical to the old Avery set. Interesting. Mike Pilla pilla(at)espinc.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: EBundy2620(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 11, 1996
Subject: Re: Fuel Valve
<< Be REAL SURE that if anyone other than you flys the airplane that they are told about this modification. I know that I'd be really unhappy if I had taken your aircraft for a jaunt and ran out of gas because the valve was pointing in the wrong direction. >> This was a big consideration for me. However, it seems to me that the "RV" way is the exception, not the rule. I have never seen another fuel valve that operates in this manner. I did grind of the tip of the selector so there is no other pointer other than the handle, and the placarding will reflect proper operation. I will make a point, however to specifically notify any other RV drivers. It seems to me that there would be far more chance for someone to be confused by the RV setup however, unless the person was familliar with the RV fuel system. -- Ed Bundy ________________________________________________________________________________
From: EBundy2620(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 11, 1996
Subject: Re: RV-8 assistance
<< My jig's done, it's square, it's empty. I'm trying to glean as much info as possible before I start sticking pieces together. I think this is just a variation on a theme...buck fever. >> My advice to you is: Jump in! There are a million pieces of information you will need to pick up to finish this project. Don't try to get them all at once. You'll just overload, and you can't remember all of it anyway. Get started, and as questions arise, ask. You WILL screw parts up, you WILL scream and throw things, and it WILL get easier. Remember, an empty jig is an unhappy jig. Ed Bundy ________________________________________________________________________________
From: EBundy2620(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 11, 1996
Subject: Re: Alternators
<< When you installed the alternator, did you need to put additional spacers between the adjustment arm and engine case. Mine did not want to line up unless I added about 4-5 washers. Otherwise the installation went smoothly. Well, mine didn't want to fit at all. (Odd, considering I bought everything including the engine from Van) When the alternator was mounted in the base bracket, the adjusting arm fell right dead center on the mounting ear. It sounds like yours did the same thing. I didn't feel comfortable using 5 washers on the adjusting arm bolt because the alternator get shaken around quite a bit, and also the pulley didn't line up properly in that situation. So instead, I ground off about 3/16" off the ear of the alternator that mounts to the base bracket on the fwd side. This allows me to mount the alternator farther fwd and then mount the adjusting arm on the back of the alternator. The pulleys now line up perfectly. Did you notice the cost of those anodized mounting brackets? About $50 for the alternator to case bracket. Oh well, they do look good and probably required a bunch of work to manufacture. >> Yeah, I thought that was a bit high (especially since they need to be modified) but, I beats doing it myself.. :) -- Ed Bundy ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 11, 1996
From: avlaw(at)nwlink.com (Steve Fribley)
Subject: Re: Voltage regulators
Twenty one bucks But you could go get a marine unit at the boat store- might be more explosiion proof. Might cost about $ 36 >Does anyone have any thoughts on voltage regulators? I don't know much about >them, but I was wondering what the difference is between the unit Van's sells >at $36 and the one I can buy at the local auto parts store for $13. > >Are there differences in regulators or are they all about the same? > >Thanks >Ed Bundy >ebundy2620(at)aol.com > > Warmest Regards, Steve Fribley avlaw(at)nwlink.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 11, 1996
Subject: Re: Alternators
><< I am at the stage where I need to fit an alternator. They seem to be >either > very expensive, or they are the El-Cheapo ones for cars. There is an > alternator shop nearby which has reconditioned ones, the Japanese types are > $110, they may be reconditioned, or they may just have black paint sprayed > on the outside. > I would appreciate some guidelines. > John Cocker. A local junkyard can supply you with a pre-owned unit from a Chevy Sprint/ Geo Metro. These are not el-cheapo, but are inexpensive. They also fit a Lycoming mount and arm with a bit of filing, and are internally regulated. Check six! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BARNES_ERIC(at)Tandem.COM
Date: Jul 11, 1996
Subject: For Sale: PS Engineering Intercom
This hit our pilots' mail list at work and I thought I'd pass it along. NOTE - CONTACT BY PHONE ONLY (it's not me!) Ron Suliteanu 408-285-0526 (work - SF Bay Area) EB- barnes_eric(at)tandem.com ------------ ORIGINAL ATTACHMENT -------- SENT 07-10-96 FROM PRINCE_BILL @TSII For Sale: PS Engineering Intercom. This is a basic 2-input intercom with VOX, and volume and squelch controls for each input. Also has a separate music in jack. Music mutes when other audio happens. Rechargable with AC adapter (included). Names your price do not respond to this e-mail. Call Ron Suliteanu at 5-0526. I will make a point, however to specifically notify any other RV drivers. It seems to me that there would be far more chance for someone to be confused by the RV setup however, unless the person was familliar with the RV fuel system. -- Ed Bundy ________________________________________________________________________________


June 27, 1996 - July 11, 1996

RV-Archive.digest.vol-bp