RV-Archive.digest.vol-dd

July 15, 1997 - July 25, 1997



      >Hi Bill,
      >
      >I had exactly the same problem with quite a few of the clecos (especially
      >the copper-colored ones) I had bought from Avery in the last year or so. 
      >I contacted Bob Avery about the problem and he quickly offered to replace
      >any bad ones and throw in a few extras to cover my trouble and return
      >shipping costs.  IMO he is an excellent person to purchase from because
      >he never hesitates to make good if a problem occurs with something you
      >purchased from him.  I suggest you give him a call.
      >
      >Bruce Stobbe
      >RV-6
      >fuselage
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: Btinn(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 15, 1997
Subject: Re: Oshkosh Sales Lot
I agree with Dennis that we have to let the public see our work if we expect any support from them at the ballot box or in the government. If we cannot make general aviation grow we will all be riding boxcars in the sky in the near future. The danger of some dings will be there even at our home bases and we must be vigilant and help educate the public as to how to appreciate our work. Criticism will not do this. I have always appreciated the philosophy of one of my early instructors, Ray Schenck, at Clarinda, Iowa in the 1940's and 50's. He had a license signed by Orville Wright and was active in aviation nearly all of his 90-some years. As a flying farmer got ready to leave Ray's FBO office one day he said "Ray, I'll go down and run those kids out of your hangars before I leave so you won't have to bother with them." Three boys aged about 8-11 were moving down his row of t-hangars, going in and looking at the planes. Ray's response was, "You let those kids look at those airplanes as long as they want. Then send them up here so I can buy them a soda pop. Ten years from now they are going to be my bread and butter." As a result of this attitude Ray always had a lot of activity around his little airport and was probably the greatest salesman for sport and general aviation I have known. We need more Ray Schencks in the field of aviation today rather than more fences around our airports with signs warning that trespass violators will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law-whatever that means. What a negative welcome mat we have laid out for our potential fellow flyers! We spend far too much time telling them what they CANNOT do in aviation and so little telling them what they CAN do. If it costs me a fingerprint or minor scratch on my plane to convey a message that the public is welcome to aviation, that's a price I am most willing to pay. My soap box is now available for rent. Bob Tinnell - RV-6A wings coming along, fuselage still in the box. Salem, Oregon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 15, 1997
Subject: Re: Air vent
From: jepilot(at)juno.com (J E REHLER)
Thanks for the clue on the loose air vent. J. E. Rehler RV6A flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JMJN01(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 15, 1997
Subject: Metal or wood prop?
I recently purchased a wonderful RV-4. It is equipped with a 150 hp Lyc with an Ed Sterba Wood prop. What is the general concensus out there, is the Seisenich metal prop better than wood in performance??? Currently at 6500' I'm getting 2700 RPM with 2450 maninfold pressure, about 160 mph indicated. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 15, 1997
From: RodWoodard <rodwoodard(at)mcione.com>
Subject: Re: intercoms/video cameras
Hi Bob: I made a simple adapter to record radio communications on my microcassette recorder through an extra headset jack in my Cherokee. If I remember correctly, it was just a simple 1/4" mono plug down to a sub-mini plug which went to my microcassette. The only downside is that I had to fly with the intercom on even when I was solo in order for the output to the cassette to work. The setup worked very well and probably only cost me about $5 in connectors. I would think you'd be able to do the same thing with audio for your video camera. The only catch might be that you'd have to wire an "extra" headset (sound only) jack in your airplane. If you've already got a built-in intercom, most of them are capable of 4-places off the shelf so it shouldn't require any major upgrade. Good luck, Rod Woodard RV-8, #80033 Loveland, Colorado ---------- > From: Bob Japundza <IIS-INTELLECT.COM!Bjapundza(at)matronics.com> > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV-List: intercoms/video cameras > Date: Monday, July 14, 1997 12:30 PM > > > Does anyone know of a way to hardwire a videocamera's audio input to an > intercom? I've seen adapters that are available, but at an excessive > price (for what they were.) It seems like it would be pretty simple to > device, and I was wondering aloud to see if someone else has made their > own adapter before I tried doing it myself. > > > Thanks, > > Bob Japundza > Integrated Information Services, LLC > bjapundza@iis-intellect.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: cecilth(at)juno.com
Subject: Re: Oshkosh Table - Van's Banquet
<19970523.154146.21871.3.cecilth(at)juno.com>
Date: Jul 15, 1997
For those that are going to Van's banquet Sunday Aug 3rd. I've be told that the tickets you paid for, to the Banquet will not be mailed out. They will be at Van's booth for pickup. The tickets will be in Van's office about 7-21-97, to late to mail out safely. Cecil Hatfield ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mitch Faatz <mfaatz(at)sagenttech.com>
Subject: QuietFlite Intercom?
Date: Jul 15, 1997
charset="iso-8859-1" I'm looking to the QuiteFlite Odyssey intercom after my tech counselor recommended looking into one for great stereo intercom system. Here are the points I pulled off of the avionix website: * HI-power, HI-FI internal amplifiers that can drive over 20 headsets of almost any type, even military ones, at full power and with perfect clarity. * Multiple "fully automatic" Digitrac squelch circuits that only activate the microphone of the person speaking, eliminating the rushing wind noise heard with other intercoms. * "AVR" Priority with mini-muting lets you control whether audio volume priority is given to the controller or pilots without shutting out either. * Super HI-FI Stereo/Mono music inputs let you connect any portable or panel mounted FM stereo radio, CD, or tape player and enjoy a concert in your plane, with no interference to ATC or cabin communication. Camcorder output is included. <<<--------(nice) * Fail safe circuits automatically switch everything directly to your comms in the unlikely event of a failure. Has anyone used one of these? At $379 it's pretty steep, but after renting many planes with crappy intercoms I'm willing to pay more if it's top of the line. I haven't found out if it has the "soft mute" where it cuts out the audio input and then slowly ramps it back up, but I'll try to find out. Any input? (thanks) Mitch Faatz San Jose, CA RV-6AQME N727MF reserved Installing electric flaps, thinking about canopy... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 15, 1997
From: wbpace(at)adnc.com (Bill Pace)
Subject: Re: Stupid things that occur
>went to rivet the other side. Somehow, unbelievably, the plastic covering >was still on the one side and I had riveted all on the skin stiffeners with >the plastic between the skin and the rivets. I can blame it to poor Hey, stuff happens, ya know? I thought I had removed the plastic around all of the holes in one of my ailerons. Found out a week later when I was admiring my work that I had missed one hole at the trailing edge. Out came the rivet, cleaned the plastic, and pop-riveted it back into place. At least it's on the bottom :-). What was worse is that my soldering iron slightly scored the Alclad when I removed it around some of the holes. I'll have to rethink how I handle the plastic when I do the wing skins. Oh well, live and learn. ----- Bill Pace wbpace(at)adnc.com San Diego, CA RV-6A, drilling wing ribs to spars ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ken_Hitchmough(at)magic.ca (Ken Hitchmough)
Date: Jul 16, 1997
Subject: Re: Brake pad replacement
In my few years experience as an A&P (44 years) and a two time builder of RV's, I must disagree that you need to jack the aircraft and remove the wheel to change the brake pads. Just remove the 2 bolts that hold the assembly in place on the disc and the inside pad will slip off the 2 studs that hold it in place. The inside pad on it's mount will drop down on the wheel and can be easily removed with your bare hand. Drill, remove the old pad, rivet on the new one and use the reverse procedure to install the new brakes. Yup, thats exactly how it went. As I said...piece of pie (or was it easy as cake?) Interesting point was that the Rapco linings had a different break in procedure than the one that came with the clevelands. The Rapco box said "come to a stop from a fast taxi (30-40 mph) twice. Allow brakes to cool. See if they hold at high power, if not repeat" The Cleveland box said something like "At 1700 rpm taxi for 1/ mile at 10 mph" (can't remember exact numbers) Thanks again to all who responded with tips. Ken RV6A Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 16, 1997
From: Phil Arter <philip.arter(at)mci2000.com>
Subject: Re: Brake pad replacement
<33CA1FDC.9DA2B516(at)MCI2000.com> Ken Hitchmough wrote: > > Phil Arter wrote > > >Pay attention to the orientation of the old rivets before you > >drill them out. > > Oh Oh! > > Already done. > > Not quite sure what you mean here. Can you explain? > > Thanks to all who responded. > > Ken > Ken, hi All I meant was, the factory head goes up against the lining, and the shop head goes on the side with the steel plate. -- Phil Arter, RV-8 #80005 philip.arter(at)mci2000.com http://acd.ucar.edu/~arter/RV8.html (303)459-0435 home ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 16, 1997
From: gcomfo(at)tc3net.com (Gordon Comfort)
Subject: Re: intercoms/video cameras
Bob Japundza wrote: > > > Does anyone know of a way to hardwire a videocamera's audio input to an > intercom? I've seen adapters that are available, but at an excessive > price (for what they were.) It seems like it would be pretty simple to > device, and I was wondering aloud to see if someone else has made their > own adapter before I tried doing it myself. > > Thanks, > > Bob Japundza > Integrated Information Services, LLC > bjapundza@iis-intellect.com > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > +-- --+ When I was wiring my RV 4 I installed an extra microphone jack and obtained an extra plug for same. Then from Radio Shack came a mic cord that matched the video camera and a 1K ohm, 1/4 watt resistor. One of the factory connectors was cut off the camera cord and the aircraft plug installed with the resistor soldered into the mic lead and located inside the plug handle. Strain relief was provided. It works very well with the Sigtronics intercom in the aircraft. Gordon Comfort N363GC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 16, 1997
From: Sharlene Shipley or Bruce Knoll <snsbfk(at)mail.sage.net>
Subject: Re: Osh Kosh Sales Lot
In reply to the concerns about the general public mingling with aircraft. One way to possibly suggest that they be careful of the planes is to deny children under a certain age (8 yrs?) permission to be on the flight line even if with adults. Anybody for this idea? Bruce Starting RV6A after Osh. > >David Moore wrote: >> >> I have never seen so much whinning since I left the Navy. >> >> The sport aviation community is a small one - we need everybody to >> work together to keep the feds off our back. The number of pilots and >> FBOs continue to shrink. EAA is working hard to reverse that trend, >> and their new policy is intended to INCLUDE more people, not be more >> exclusive. >> >> Although there are not many of us, we all converge on Whitman field >> for that one week. Expect to have to give in a little - be supportive >> and voluteer to help, rather than sit back and criticise. > >I am all for "inclusion" but.... the EAA has an obligation to offer >reasonable >protection to the aircraft of it's "members". I support the effort but >not the >plan as is currently offered. > >Tell me I'm whinning after some kid has his lawn chair parked on your >wing.... >-- >Rick and Barbara Osgood > >RandBOsgood(at)sprintmail.com > > > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > +-- --+ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 16, 1997
From: Scott Gesele <scottg(at)icsnet.com>
Subject: Re: airframe options
>Just got a ride in an RV6 last evening, that put the nail in the coffin. >Will be ordering an RV6AQ very soon. I was wondering what decisions have >to be made before the order? Such as speed mods from aftermarket >vendors, which could be deleted from order for credit. Am I right in >assuming I don't have to know what motor will be going in at this time? Dave, I wouldn't worry too much about speed modifications from aftermarket vendors. Spam cans benefit from them, but Van's did such a good job with the design of the RV's that there really isn't much (if any) room for significant improvements. There are a few products out there, wingtips for example, whose manufacturer has "optimistic" performance gains. Just build a stock RV and you will have one hell of an airplane. You are correct in assuming that you don't need to know what engine is going in at the time of order. Keep in mind that if you opt for a new engine from Van's, they can have a significant lead time. Hope this helps. Scott Gesele N506RV (finishing painting and going to the airport this weekend :))) ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: manifold pressure
Date: Jul 16, 1997
From: "William H. Watson" <watson1(at)alink.net>
>> It seem= >> s to me that if the engine is making more power it should be sucking in = >> more fuel and air through the carb and therefore have more vacuum in the = >> intake manifold so it stands to reason to me that the gauge should be rea= >> ding more vacuum (or less pressure) and the needle should go down and not= >> up! My first experience with manifold pressure (or vacume) was when the windshield wipers slowed down or slopped after floored the accelerator and entered the passing lane in an old Chevy. At idle, they flapped away like crazy.... Bill Watson RV6A Wings to Inventory ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 16, 1997
From: Dr John Cocker <jcocker(at)medhumor.com>
Subject: Re: REngine breather question
While on this subject, I have two lots of air/oil to get rid of. The first from the crankcase breather, and the second from the vacuum pump, I have the "wet: type. As a temporary measure I ran the two tubes down to the exhaust, but now the bottom of the fuselage is covered with oil, which drips onto the hangar floor. I intend to drill and tap a fitting into the oil filler tube, which is plastic. I have two oil separators to mount on the firwall - my question is, can I run both oil outlets into the same fitting ? And do I need two oil separators ? The pressures from each outlet will be different. John Cocker 36 hours already and increasing every day. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dave Bergh" <dbergh(at)cyberhighway.net>
Subject: Re: Small Mistake?
Date: Jul 16, 1997
---------- > > Hello all, > > I've got a Pre-Punched Empennage for a -6A. When preliminarily attaching > the spar (R-602PP) to the rudder skin (R-601PP), I noticed that the top > right hole on the spar flange is low by 1/8" and doesn't match the > skin!!> Hi Greg, I've run into the same thing. I drilled the spar to match the skin and then I made a small doubler to mount inside the spar flange that spans two rivets to make up for the extra hole in the spar flange. Let me kow what you come up with. See Ya Dave Bergh RV6 emp. almost done! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 16, 1997
From: Edward Cole <emcole(at)concentric.net>
Subject: Re: intercoms/video cameras
Bob Japundza wrote: > > > Does anyone know of a way to hardwire a videocamera's audio input to an > intercom? I've seen adapters that are available, but at an excessive > price (for what they were.) It seems like it would be pretty simple to > device, and I was wondering aloud to see if someone else has made their > own adapter before I tried doing it myself. > > Thanks, > > Bob Japundza > Integrated Information Services, LLC > bjapundza@iis-intellect.com > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > +-- --+ Bob, A lot of the intercoms has an audio out jack. Use a standard radio shack mono cable. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "rick Jorgensen" <rpjorgen(at)dcn.davis.ca.us>
Subject: Re: Metal or wood prop?
Date: Jul 16, 1997
congradulations on the purchase. where did you purchase this airplane? How do you like the 150hp If i could ask, how much did it sell for? thanks ---------- > > > I recently purchased a wonderful RV-4. It is equipped with a 150 hp = Lyc with > an Ed Sterba Wood prop. What is the general concensus out there, is = the > Seisenich metal prop better than wood in performance??? Currently at = 6500' > I'm getting 2700 RPM with 2450 maninfold pressure, about 160 mph indica= ted. > > > > +-- = --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.c= om | > | --- = | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request@matronics= .com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or sub= ject. | > +-- = --+ > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BChat64832(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 16, 1997
Subject: Re: thanks for manifold pressure reply
Vern, there are two ''vacuum'' ports on most auto carbs manufactered in the last 15 years.One above the butterfly and ,the other below the butterfly.The vacuum advance connects to the port above the butterfly which allows timing to be advanced only when the butterfly moves off the idle position - improves emissions while degrading efficiency.The other port provides full time vacuum for other purposes. The above applies to automotive applications ONLY. Vacuum advance probably is not used on aircraft applications. Your manifold pressure guage apparently was connected above the butterfly which may have allowed the high velocity rush of air that occurs when the butterfly opens,to suck the reading down to zero.Then,as power is increased , velocity decreases, allowing the guage to read closer to actual manifold pressure. I would be very surprised if accurate manifold pressure readings can be obtained from either of these ports-too many velocity changes.A more accurate reading should be available at the manifold port provided for power brake vacuum,if you can adapt to it.I don't see how the absence of a prop could cause the situation you described. I believe there is a lot of interest in this type of installation ---sure would appreciate if you could keep us informed. Bob Chatham RV6-A wings-ailerons Columbia S.C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Austin Tinckler" <tinckler(at)axionet.com>
Subject: Re: Questions
Date: Jul 16, 1997
---------- > From: Michael C. Lott <datastar.net!lottmc(at)matronics.com> > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV-List: Questions > 2. I was thinking about rigging a hitch to attach the tail wheel > to my truck bumper for towing the fuselage to the airport. Has anyone > had experience with towing one down the road? > I have indirectly, this is how I got a great engine because the tow flipped and rolled........RV great for aerobatics, but not this low................Austin. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Cafgef(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 16, 1997
Subject: Re: Osh Kosh Sales Lot
<< I have never seen so much whinning since I left the Navy. The sport aviation community is a small one - we need everybody to work together to keep the feds off our back. The number of pilots and FBOs continue to shrink. EAA is working hard to reverse that trend, and their new policy is intended to INCLUDE more people, not be more exclusive. Although there are not many of us, we all converge on Whitman field for that one week. Expect to have to give in a little - be supportive and voluteer to help, rather than sit back and criticise. >> Good point Gene Francis; cafgef(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 16, 1997
Subject: Re: Oshkosh and EAA
From: bstobbe(at)juno.com (Bruce D Stobbe)
David wrote: snip >Don't be so incredulous and nieve. EAA is a business - it has to be. And overall, it supports us very well. Let's use this forum for building, OK?< If all we ever discuss here is primers, what length rivet to use, the best bandsaw to buy, and which compressor is best, don't you think it'll get a little boring after awhile? Personally, I enjoy the variations in topics that are generally aviation related and outside the realm of *pure* RV building... Anyway, I have to agree with those who have had their pride and joy mauled by the uncaring actions of others. I wonder what those same people would say if they came back to their car to find you sitting on their hood with your kids watching the airshow. Bruce Stobbe RV-6; N508RV (res) yep, still working on the fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BigCfly001(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 16, 1997
Subject: Re: Small Mistake?
greg, I just finished my rudder and had the same problem.I just drilled a new hole in the flange.using the skin as a guide.worked fine. chris marion rv-6 starting elevator cincy oh ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 16, 1997
From: "Mark D Hiatt" <OttoPilot_MSN(at)msn.com>
Subject: List Traffic During Oshkosh.
It seems like we've got about one-third more traffic on the list today than we had a year ago. Maybe that's just my impression, though. Anyway, I'm wondering about going away for ten days or so and leaving things alone, as against cancelling the list for a week, or chancing that everything will be fine when I get back. I have the feeling that most of the heavy-talkers are going to be at Oshkosh at least part of that time, and thus without computer access and so any messages that are sent will wait happily for our return. On the other hand, all it takes is for someone to fill-up their mailbox and the bounced-message traffic could fill up some more. I know we've been warned by Matronics that if we do that we'll be instantly un-subscribed as soon as its discovered, but then again I kind of expect they'll be at Oshkosh, too! Anyone have any ideas on how things might go, this year? The Microsoft Network mailboxes don't (or at least haven't) fill(ed) up yet and are supposed to be good for a few hundred messages, but in this day of Spam and with the increased message traffic on the list, I dunno what to expect. I'd hate to miss anything, but then again I'd hate to crash the list, too. Thoughts? Mark D Hiatt Visit us on MSN v2! OttoPilot_MSN@msn.com http://Forums.msn.com/Aviation Aviation Forum Manager, AvChat Mondays 10pm Eastern The Microsoft Network mic://Chat.msn.com/AvChat Tailkit in box, beside computer. Waiting for garage to start building. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 16, 1997
From: "Mark D Hiatt" <OttoPilot_MSN(at)msn.com>
Subject: Oshkosh Sales Lot
What a terrific post, Bob! I wish I'd met Schenck--he sounds like my kind of guy. I learned to fly in Norfolk, Nebraska. I literally rode my bike out to the airport and washed airplanes for lessons. Today, I fly out of Lincoln (LNK), Nebraska, where Lindbergh learned to fly. Nobody in town seems to know this or care, and the airport is just that big noisy fenced-off area northwest of town. There are twelve-foot barbed-wire fences surrounding the two FBOs, and if you park in the parking lot to watch the airplanes, you have to look around fourteen "WARNING!" signs of one degree or another. To their credit, nobody has ever stolen or hijacked a Cherokee from LNK, but it's been twenty years or more since that Norman Rockwellesque kid-at-the-airport-fence had a chance, in this town. And you have to really want to get to the general aviation side of the field. There's a turnoff, but it isn't marked. There isn't a sign ANYwhere on the drive to the big main terminal that says "Airplane Rides!" or "Learn To Fly!" or "Flying Lessons!" or anything like that. As Bob said, it's not friendly at all and it isn't helping things. We're supposed to set little goals, and then bigger ones. "I'm going to pound a dozen rivets this afternoon" or "I'm going to paint those wheel pants, this afternoon" and such. I want to fly my RV-6A to Kill Devil Hill in North Carolina and say "Thanks" to the breezes there and I hope to fly a lot of kids in my homebuilt airplane and maybe give one or two that spark to go on and take lessons. The nicest, biggest airport I've seen in years is Frederick, Maryland, home of the AOPA and Gene and EAA524. You can drive out to your airplane and load it, meet passengers, etc. just like in the olden days. I wish there was some way to return to that. I haven't got a clue, myself, but I'm sure that we're choking ourselves off at the roots by having no more kids on bikes staring up in awe and wonder as the airplanes pass overhead at the end of the runway. Mark D Hiatt Visit us on MSN v2! OttoPilot_MSN@msn.com http://Forums.msn.com/Aviation Aviation Forum Manager, AvChat Mondays 10pm Eastern The Microsoft Network mic://Chat.msn.com/AvChat -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com On Behalf Of aol.com!Btinn(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 1997 3:06 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Oshkosh Sales Lot I have always appreciated the philosophy of one of my early instructors, Ray Schenck, at Clarinda, Iowa in the 1940's and 50's. He had a license signed by Orville Wright and was active in aviation nearly all of his 90-some years. As a flying farmer got ready to leave Ray's FBO office one day he said "Ray, I'll go down and run those kids out of your hangars before I leave so you won't have to bother with them." Three boys aged about 8-11 were moving down his row of t-hangars, going in and looking at the planes. Ray's response was, "You let those kids look at those airplanes as long as they want. Then send them up here so I can buy them a soda pop. Ten years from now they are going to be my bread and butter." As a result of this attitude Ray always had a lot of activity around his little airport and was probably the greatest salesman for sport and general aviation I have known. We need more Ray Schencks in the field of aviation today rather than more fences around our airports with signs warning that trespass violators will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law-whatever that means. What a negative welcome mat we have laid out for our potential fellow flyers! We spend far too much time telling them what they CANNOT do in aviation and so little telling them what they CAN do. If it costs me a fingerprint or minor scratch on my plane to convey a message that the public is welcome to aviation, that's a price I am most willing to pay. My soap box is now available for rent. Bob Tinnell - RV-6A wings coming along, fuselage still in the box. Salem, Oregon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 17, 1997
From: Frank van der Hulst <frankv(at)pec.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Small Mistake?
gte.net!gregbrew(at)matronics.com wrote: > > > I've got a Pre-Punched Empennage for a -6A. When preliminarily > attaching > the spar (R-602PP) to the rudder skin (R-601PP), I noticed that the > top > right hole on the spar flange is low by 1/8" and doesn't match the > skin!! The rest, and the left flange match. Any other P.P. folks out > there get this too? Snap! I had this on mine, bought April last year. January this year I emailed the list and Vans about it. No-one on the list replied. Vans said not to worry, there's no strength issues despite lack of edge distance, and just drill another hole in the spar to match the one in the skin. See http://www.pec.co.nz/~frankv/bunny1.htm for this and other rudder tips. Their explanation was that this was due to jitter in the CNC drilling machine, which seems very unlikely to me. My explanation is that either the program for the CNC machine has that hole in the wrong place (in which case every RV-6 rudder spar would be wrong) or there's a bug in the CNC machine's computer. Whatever it is, it seems Vans hasn't fixed it in 6 months. Frank. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 16, 1997
From: "Larry D. Hoatson" <lhoatson(at)e2.empirenet.com>
Subject: Gravel vs. Wood Prop...
Thanks in advance for any ideas on this problem. My uncle's 6A picked up a piece of gravel with the prop. The hit is on the backside of the prop, about 6 inches out from the flange on one blade only. It resulted in a couple of dings in the wood. The rear of the prop is painted black, and wood grain can now be seen through in the two areas that were hit. What is the necessary, required or preferred method of treating this situation. Is it enough to seal the holes, or is further action required? Thanks Again, Larry -- Larry D. Hoatson Yucaipa, CA Redlands (L12) Airport lhoatson(at)empirenet.com KC6WYF via packet at: KC6WYF(at)W6JBT.SOCAL.CA.USA.NOAM Restoring 1950 Cessna 170A N9948A... Looking forward to RV-6 "Either Raise Your Skill Level... or Lower Your Standards" ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 16, 1997
From: Boris <smbr(at)digital.net>
Subject: Re: Metal or wood prop?
What is the dia. and pitch of the prop? Thanks. aol.com!JMJN01(at)matronics.com wrote: > > > I recently purchased a wonderful RV-4. It is equipped with a 150 hp Lyc with > an Ed Sterba Wood prop. What is the general concensus out there, is the > Seisenich metal prop better than wood in performance??? Currently at 6500' > I'm getting 2700 RPM with 2450 maninfold pressure, about 160 mph indicated. > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > +-- --+ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 16, 1997
From: Finn Lassen <finnlass(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: manifold pressure
I still don't get it. The only way air (& fuel) is going to get into the cylinders is if the pressue in the cylinders is lower than that of the surounding air. Thus, in the intake manifold you must have a lower pressure (vacum) than the surrounding air. The bigger the difference (the bigger the vacum = lower pressure) the higher the flow of air & fuel produced. So, even if the gauge is meassuring absolute pressure, the pressure must be lowest when the biggest flow is occuring (most power is being produced). Please se me straight on this. Finn > Another way to think of it is to consider the pressure drop > across the throttle. If you close the throttle valve at a > given RPM, what's going to happen to the manifold pressure? > It's going to drop, right? Likewise, if you open the throttle > the pressure's going to rise. > > Tedd McHenry ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dralle(at)matronics.com (Matt Dralle 510-606-1001)
Date: Jul 16, 1997
Subject: Re: List Traffic During Oshkosh.
Compuserve and AOL are the big offenders when it comes to bouncing mail because of full mailboxes. I suspect that you shouldn't have to worry too much about unsubscribing from the List if you're gone for a week or so. Thanks for caring... Matt Dralle RV-List Admin. >-------------- > >It seems like we've got about one-third more traffic on the list today than we >had a year ago. Maybe that's just my impression, though. Anyway, I'm wondering >about going away for ten days or so and leaving things alone, as against >cancelling the list for a week, or chancing that everything will be fine when >I get back. > >I have the feeling that most of the heavy-talkers are going to be at Oshkosh >at least part of that time, and thus without computer access and so any >messages that are sent will wait happily for our return. > >On the other hand, all it takes is for someone to fill-up their mailbox and >the bounced-message traffic could fill up some more. I know we've been warned >by Matronics that if we do that we'll be instantly un-subscribed as soon as >its discovered, but then again I kind of expect they'll be at Oshkosh, too! > >Anyone have any ideas on how things might go, this year? The Microsoft Network >mailboxes don't (or at least haven't) fill(ed) up yet and are supposed to be >good for a few hundred messages, but in this day of Spam and with the >increased message traffic on the list, I dunno what to expect. I'd hate to >miss anything, but then again I'd hate to crash the list, too. Thoughts? > >Mark D Hiatt Visit us on MSN v2! >-------------- -- Matt G. Dralle | Matronics | P.O. Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 510-606-1001 Voice | 510-606-6281 FAX | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ W.W.W. | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 17, 1997
From: Rob Hatwell <hatters(at)overvne.demon.co.uk>
Subject: RV4 Rear Seat Vent
Dear Listers Posting this for an RV4 builder who is not on the list. He has heard that there is a successful mod for rear seat vent using a NACA duct on the underside of the wing and ducting it into the rear seat area. Does anyone have information or done this mod. Vic would like enough engineering information to carry out this mod. Thanks in advance RV8 80274 Builder. -- Rob Hatwell ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JDaniel343(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 16, 1997
Subject: Re: Osh Kosh Sales Lot
I have to disagree since the youth is our future. The younger we expose them to aviation the better, and maybe they will be tought proper manners around our aircraft. My children have always been with me to Oshkosh since they were 5 or 6. They know aircraft and respect them. THey know what it takes to put an experimental aircraft in the air since they have helped me drill holes and buck rivets. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kerrjb(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 16, 1997
Subject: Re: Small Mistake?
<< I've got a Pre-Punched Empennage for a -6A. When preliminarily attaching the spar (R-602PP) to the rudder skin (R-601PP), I noticed that the top right hole on the spar flange is low by 1/8" and doesn't match the skin!! The rest, and the left flange match. Any other P.P. folks out there get this too >> We just experienced the same thing and Bill B said it was an original error that had been fixed but had crept back into the program. Bernie Kerr 6A wings on jigs, started Memorial Day, Hope to fly next year ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kerrjb(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 16, 1997
Subject: Re: Silly question of the week
<< Bill, Lubricate them with a drop of oil. Any kind works, but I use 3 in 1. Dan Morris > completely. They are binding up inside. Can anyone suggest the best way > to lubricate these things? WD-40? Graphite? Soak 'em in motor oil >> We bought cleco's from Avery at this Year's S&F and when we were fitting ribs to the spars it is interesting that we also started having sticky non functioning one's. Our solution was to try something that had no silicones and no oil to get in under the rivet holes and cause a later problem with the final paint job. We used a teflon bicycle chain lubricant that dries and does not collect dirt on the chain. It fixes the clecoes, but we do not know if it will cause a problem later with the paint. The contents do not show any thing that is obviously bad on the paint. The trade name is "FINISH LINE". Bernie Kerr ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 16, 1997
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)navix.net>
Subject: Re: Metal or wood prop?
> >I recently purchased a wonderful RV-4. It is equipped with a 150 hp Lyc with >an Ed Sterba Wood prop. What is the general concensus out there, is the >Seisenich metal prop better than wood in performance??? Currently at 6500' >I'm getting 2700 RPM with 2450 maninfold pressure, about 160 mph indicated. Your numbers look pretty good to me. Have you checked your tach for accuracy? It seems common practice to "tune" the prop so as to turn at red line at full throttle at 7,500-8,000 feet. The manifold pressure looks good. Indicated airspeed is not calibrated airspeed. You could put in several airspeed indicators and fly under the same conditions and have different indicated readings. Readings will vary according to temps and altitude. I switched from a wood prop to the Sensenich. The cruise performance is about the same but the Sensenich is turning 70 to 100 rpms slower. I think my take off and climb is slightly better with the Sensenich and I don't have to check torque all of the time. Also, I don't need to throttle back in rain. Was it worth the extra cost to change? Probably not. I wasn't completely satisfied with the wood prop, having sent it back three times to be re-carved to increase rpms. I knew that re-pitching a metal prop has more predictable results than re-carving a wood prop. Should you change props? Who knows? You could better or worsen your performance. I do feel that the airfoil is more effecient on the Sensenich. I seemed to have to stand on the brakes a little harder at run-up with the Sensenich than I had to with the wood prop. BTW, don't forget that the Sensenich has a redline of 2,600 rpms which compromises take off rpms. My take off rpms are around 2,180. Performance would be better if the engine was turning 2,300 but then, at full throttle at altitude, I'd have to throttle back to stay under 2,600. If you could try someones Sensenich, your question could be answered at little or no cost. Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)navix.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 16, 1997
From: John Ammeter <ammeterj(at)seanet.com>
Subject: Re: Arlington Airfair
You're right. I checked the card he gave me and it reads Steve Beckham. I wrote the below from memory; you know the memory is the second thing you lose as you get older---I don't recall the first thing. John > >John Ammeter wrote: >> > >> >> Steve _BECKHAM_ with his Mazda engined RV4 braved the rain from his >> Oregon >> home to the Airfair. He said the rain was the worst he has ever flown >> through. >> >> Don Mingst and Bob Spencer taxied their RV6A across the field to show >> off >> their Chevy Vortec 4.3L engine. They expect to get the blessing of >> the FAA >> within the next week or two and be able to fly their aircraft. >> >> Next year we hope to see many of the RV-List people. >> >> John Ammeter >> >Actually John I think it was Steve Peckham(sp) not Steve Barnard >Steve was flying Powersports rotary powered RV-4. > >Thanks again for the great hospitality that the Puget sound RVators >gave each of us, it was a blast being there and seeing probably >60 RV's and the 14 RV formation fly bys. Arlington just seems to get >better every year. I got to put allot of faces with names from the list. >and it was nice to meet each of you that came by and said hello. >The barbecue was better than ever tons of great food. > > >Jerry >-- >Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS First flight July 14, 1989 :-) Hillsboro, OR >jsflyrv(at)ix.netcom.com > > > John Ammeter ammeterj(at)seanet.com 3233 NE 95th St Seattle WA, 98115 USA 206-525-5445 RV-6 N16JA First flight August 1990 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 16, 1997
Subject: Re: manifold pressure
<33CD7C72.C16(at)ix.netcom.com>
From: skymike(at)juno.com (Michael E. Lynch)
>I still don't get it. The only way air (& fuel) is going to get into >the >cylinders is if the pressue in the cylinders is lower than that of the >surounding air. Thus, in the intake manifold you must have a lower >pressure (vacum) than the surrounding air. The bigger the difference >(the bigger the vacum = lower pressure) the higher the flow of air & >fuel produced. > >So, even if the gauge is meassuring absolute pressure, the pressure >must >be lowest when the biggest flow is occuring (most power is being >produced). > >Please se me straight on this. Finn, Although it is true fuel and air get into the cylinder because of the low pressure gradient caused by the down-going cylinder, it is the manifold absolute pressure (MAP) in the intake manifold that "pushes" the mixture to the lower pressure area. At constant rpm and altitude, the amount of power produced is directly related to the fuel/air flow being delivered to the cylinder. As throttle is increased, more of the mixture flows to the cylinders, and MAP increases. The gauge acts as a barometer, indicating ambient air pressure when the engine is not running. It decreases in standard conditions by about one inch for every 1000 feet of altitude. When the engine is running, it is a relative indicator of how much power the engine can produce at a given altitude. After the engine starts, it acts as a sort of "suction pump" and the MAP drops to well less than ambient pressure. (Down to about 10" at idle) As the throttle is opened to full, the MAP increases until the maximum of slightly less than ambient pressure is reached (and full power production), due to slight losses of efficiency in the engine. On the other hand, in a turbocharged engine, this efficiency is vastly exceeded by forcing greater than ambient pressures into the engine, causing overall MAP to be greater at full power than before you started the engine! Simply stated, MAP is a relative indicator of how much power your engine can produce at a given air density and altitude. Mike Lynch RV6A - Vertical Stab in the jig. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "mcomeaux" <mcomeaux(at)cmc.net>
Subject: Re: Questions
Date: Jul 16, 1997
Spend fifty dollars for a roll bed tow truck. You made it this far. ---------- > From: Austin Tinckler <axionet.com!tinckler(at)matronics.com> > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: Questions > Date: Wednesday, July 16, 1997 8:42 AM > > > > > ---------- > > From: Michael C. Lott <datastar.net!lottmc(at)matronics.com> > > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > > Subject: RV-List: Questions > > 2. I was thinking about rigging a hitch to attach the tail wheel > > to my truck bumper for towing the fuselage to the airport. Has anyone > > had experience with towing one down the road? > > > > I have indirectly, this is how I got a great engine because the tow flipped > and rolled........RV great for aerobatics, but not this > low................Austin. > > > > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > +-- --+ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JamesCone(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 16, 1997
Subject: Re: intercoms/video cameras
Check with Radio Shack for the parts you need. Jim Cone jamescone(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 16, 1997
From: mauser(at)claris.com (Richard Chandler)
Subject: Re: manifold pressure
> > I still don't get it. The only way air (& fuel) is going to get into > the cylinders is if the pressue in the cylinders is lower than that of > the surounding air. Thus, in the intake manifold you must have a > lower pressure (vacum) than the surrounding air. The bigger the > difference (the bigger the vacum = lower pressure) the higher the flow > of air & fuel produced. > > So, even if the gauge is meassuring absolute pressure, the pressure > must be lowest when the biggest flow is occuring (most power is > being produced). > > Please se me straight on this. You're confusing the vaccuum of the piston with the pressure in the Manifold. Try this metaphor. Take your shop vac. The tank of the shop vac is the cylinder. The hose is the intake manifold, and your hand over the end of the hose is the throttle plate. If you cover the end of the hose completely, there's very low pressure in the hose. Not very much air gets run through the vac. If you were to put an MP gauge on the hose, it would read very low pressure. Engines without throttles run full out, that's why the word is "Throttle", it strangles the engine to slow it down. The velocity of air through the system is controlled by restriction, not the vaccuum of the piston, since it's gonna move the same volume every stroke regardless (same volume, but lower pressure). You've got a system with three stages and two valves seperating them. Atmosphere > Throttle > Manifold > Intake valve > Cylinder. The pressure drops at each stage, but with the throttle open, the drop is minimal, and you have more air available in the manifold to be taken in. If you take your hand off of the end of the hose, air travels freely into the tank of the vac. The velocity of air through the hose is high, but there is so little resistance to atmospheric air that the pressure inside the hose is almost (But not quite) the same as the pressure outside. With less resistance, it's possible to suck in a lot more air and fuel. Now if you take your compressor hose and blow it into the vac hose, that's a turbo or supercharger and the pressure inside the hose can be even greater than the atmospheric pressure. (a turbo would be like fan driven by the exhaust port of the vac, and a Supercharger would be like one driven by the vac motor) Here's another way of thinking about it. You're right in that it takes the pressure differential between the intake manifold and the cylinder to suck fuel/air mixture into the cylinder. With the throttle closed, the pressure in the manifold is less, which means there's less differential between the cylinder and the manifold and thus less ability to draw in mixture. A theoretical perfect vaccuum in the manifold would make it impossible for the cylinder to draw in anything. -- Richard Chandler RV-6: Garage bought and being finished, saving for tools and tail kit. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 17, 1997
Subject: Re: manifold pressure
<33CD7C72.C16(at)ix.netcom.com>
From: bstobbe(at)juno.com (Bruce D Stobbe)
You wrote: >I still don't get it. The only way air (& fuel) is going to get into the cylinders is if the pressue in the cylinders is lower than that of the surounding air. Thus, in the intake manifold you must have a lower pressure (vacum) than the surrounding air. The bigger the difference (the bigger the vacum = lower pressure) the higher the flow of air & fuel produced.< Think of it this way instead. The pistons create a suction on the downstroke when the intake valve is open, this lowers the local pressure in the cylinder to something below atmospheric, which causes atmospheric air to rush into the cylinder to even things out via the intake valve, intake manifold, and carburetor throat. Along the way the carburetor mixes in a little fuel as the air passes through to keep things exciting. I know, it's called *manifold pressure*, but in a normally aspirated engine the manifold pressure can never exceed the ambient atmospheric pressure - most folks would probably refer to this as a vacuum instead, since we normally relate to atmospheric pressure (lower than atmospheric is a vacuum/higher is pressure). The only way that the manifold can be at a higher pressure than the surrounding atmospheric pressure is if a ram-air or blower system is used to force the air into the cylinders. The butterfly in the carb is a controlled leak to atmospheric pressure from the suction produced in the intake manifold by the pistons. When the throttle is at idle the butterfly is almost fully closed and there is only a small leak through which the air can rush in to even things out, which results in a relatively low pressure (higher vacuum) in the intake manifold. When the throttle is open the butterfly is open and a big air leak is present to atmospheric pressure allowing much more air to be sucked in (and more fuel too), which results in the manifold pressure being closer to that of the surrounding atmosphere (lower vacuum/higher pressure). That's why the gauge reads a higher number (closer to atmospheric) when the throttle is fully open. Hope this helps. Bruce Stobbe RV-6; N508RV (res) Winsted, CT ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 17, 1997
From: John Darby <johnd@our-town.com>
Subject: Re: Metal or wood prop?
JMJN01(at)aol.com > >I recently purchased a wonderful RV-4. It is equipped with a 150 hp Lyc with >an Ed Sterba Wood prop. What is the general concensus out there, is the >Seisenich metal prop better than wood in performance??? Currently at 6500' >I'm getting 2700 RPM with 2450 maninfold pressure, about 160 mph indicated. > I changed over from a 'modified' metal prop to the Sens. on my RV6. It hurt me a little on TO(plus about 100-150 feet) and climb(minus about 150 fpm), but sure made up for it in cruise. I had the 150hp and put on a 78 pitch prop. It moved my cruise from 165 to 184 TAS at 7500-8000 feet, full throt, about 2535 rpm with about 22-23 in. merc. The only thing, and it's subjective, is that to me the Sens. prop is not as eye appealing as some of the woods and the 'modified' metal that I had. Everything is a compromise and has its' cost, doesn't it? John Darby RV6 sold Stephenville TX johnd@our-town.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 17, 1997
Subject: Re: RV4 Rear Seat Vent
<< He has heard that there is a successful mod for rear seat vent using a NACA duct on the underside of the wing and ducting it into the rear seat area. Does anyone have information or done this mod. Vic would like enough engineering information to carry out this mod. Thanks in advance RV8 80274 Builder. >> I guess you could say I'm the one who discovered this use of Van's SV-kit. I see where the same style is used on the yellow -8. I'm fairly sure the info you want is in the archives, or email me off the list and I'll give you a run-down. Check six! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RVinfo(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 17, 1997
Subject: Ken Hatfield
I have seen ads in trade-a-plane for products from ken hatfield industries for roller rockers and camshafts. I havn't seen these adds for quite some time though. Does anyone know anything about these products. I am currently majoring an 10360 and am exploring all options. Bruce Green ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 17, 1997
From: Boris <smbr(at)digital.net>
Subject: Re: manifold pressure
Finn, In the abscence of any restriction within the intake manifold, you are correct. The higher the flow the more the pressure drop. The man. gauge measures the differential pressure drop between the outside of the carb across the butterfly valve.! At idle and low throttle settings there is considerable restriction to flow caused by the butterfly valve mostly blocking the intake 'tube'. Even at reduced rpm, there is a larger pressure drop from one side of the valve to the other. At high settings the intake 'tube' is much less restricted and there is much less pressure drop. The gauge will measure nearer the static pressure. Finn Lassen wrote: > > > I still don't get it. The only way air (& fuel) is going to get into the > cylinders is if the pressue in the cylinders is lower than that of the > surounding air. Thus, in the intake manifold you must have a lower > pressure (vacum) than the surrounding air. The bigger the difference > (the bigger the vacum = lower pressure) the higher the flow of air & > fuel produced. > > So, even if the gauge is meassuring absolute pressure, the pressure must > be lowest when the biggest flow is occuring (most power is being > produced). > > Please se me straight on this. > > Finn > > > Another way to think of it is to consider the pressure drop > > across the throttle. If you close the throttle valve at a > > given RPM, what's going to happen to the manifold pressure? > > It's going to drop, right? Likewise, if you open the throttle > > the pressure's going to rise. > > > > Tedd McHenry > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > +-- --+ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RVator(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 17, 1997
Subject: Re: Oshkosh and EAA
For those of you on AOL, if you go back to the January Airshow bulletin board, under OshKosh, their was lengthy discussion with Dick Kapinski (eaa P.R.) concerning the new admission policy. Some of your questions may be answered there. The daily admission will still be pretty hefty for non-members, $21 a day, so maybe perhaps the multitudes won't descend in droves as we fear. :) From a practical standpoint I suggest RVers' adapt a neighborhood watch mindset. become familar with the RV tied next to yours and its owner. If someone you don't recognize crossses the barricade tape, politely ask if they have permission. RVator ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 17, 1997
From: Gene Gottschalk <geneg(at)rattler.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Oshkosh and EAA
Just my take on this topic. One beautiful spring day had I received and just started my apanage kit. I happened to be at the field with my very supportive wife when an RV 3 flew in for a fuel stop. I was very excited and we went out on the ramp to look more closely. My wife ran her fingers across the horizontal stabilizer and observed how she couldn't even feel the rivets. The pilot ran out and cursed at her, chastising her for the violation of a protocol she didn't even know existed. I remember feeling at the time that I was embarrassed to be associated with a group of people that exhibited this kind of behavior, and made a mental note that I would make it a point to never react that way. I remember I felt that if the bird is that fragile I didn't want to fly in it! I have since come to realize he was in a minority and that most experimental armature builders are quite friendly, outgoing and accommodating. I guess I think the same way when I buy a new car or motorcycle. I somehow feel relief when I get the first ding so I don't have to worry about it anymore. Maybe it doesn't bother me as much since I'm not building a show plane, but I certainly know how much effort goes into the construction. I recently invited an acquaintance (a new fellow chapter member) over because he wanted to see my project. He hemmed and hawed and finally admitted he was interested in building, but didn't think he could acquire the skills to build something safe. I asked him to join in and pound some rivets with me. He was astounded I would ask. He said others he had approached had denied him, saying they didn't want anyone else to work on their project! I think we should always make every effort to include the general public in our passion. I would think this is a lot more fun when you share it with others. -Gene Gottschalk RV-6a, skinning the fuselage N700RV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kerrjb(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 17, 1997
Subject: Re: manifold pressure
<< Now if you take your compressor hose and blow it into the vac hose, that's a turbo or supercharger and the pressure inside the hose can be even greater than the atmospheric pressure. (a turbo would be like fan driven by the exhaust port of the vac, and a Supercharger would be like one driven by the vac motor) >> I have not been following this discussion so my comment may be redundant. Yes it is possible to get higher than the atmosheric pressure at the manifold without a supercharger or turbo. If we are moving through the air, we have the potential to capture the dynamic head pressure by slowing the air down through a diffuser before the wide open throttle. Yes there will still be a drop through the air system downstream of the diffuser if air is going to flow to the cylinder. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 17, 1997
From: Edward Cole <emcole(at)concentric.net>
Subject: Re: Ken Hatfield
aol.com!RVinfo(at)matronics.com wrote: > > > I have seen ads in trade-a-plane for products from ken hatfield industries > for roller rockers and camshafts. I havn't seen these adds for quite some > time though. Does anyone know anything about these products. I am currently > majoring an 10360 and am exploring all options. > > Bruce Green > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > +-- --+ Bruce, I saw the rocker arms advertised in a Chief Aircraft Catalog. You might want to check with them. Ed Cole ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 17, 1997
From: RELOSVCS!WESTREG!EHENSON(at)cldwell.attmail.com (Henson, Eric)
Subject: Wanted: Piper Pitot
Hi Gang, Sorry for the repost of this issue, I don't have access to the archives or I'd go there first. I'm looking for a Piper pitot tube, used of course. Anyone have any suggestions for their favorite salvage yard. A few weeks ago someone suggested J.T. Evans - no luck there and Wentworth. The # to Wentworth that was posted was not in service. Any help will sure be appreciated, feel free to respond privately. Eric Henson Starting the Tanks ehenson(at)cldwell.attmail.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 17, 1997
From: steve(at)barnardaircraft.com (barnardaircraft)
Subject: Re: airframe options
> >>Just got a ride in an RV6 last evening, that put the nail in the coffin. >>Will be ordering an RV6AQ very soon. I was wondering what decisions have >>to be made before the order? Such as speed mods from aftermarket >>vendors, which could be deleted from order for credit. Am I right in >>assuming I don't have to know what motor will be going in at this time? > >Dave, > >I wouldn't worry too much about speed modifications from aftermarket >vendors. Spam cans benefit from them, but Van's did such a good job with >the design of the RV's that there really isn't much (if any) room for >significant improvements. There are a few products out there, wingtips for >example, whose manufacturer has "optimistic" performance gains. Just >build a stock RV and you will have one hell of an airplane. > >Scott Gesele N506RV (finishing painting and going to the airport this Hi Scott, I couldn't help but notice one comment above about Van doing such a good job with the design there really is'nt much if any room for improvement. Scott, does 30 mph gains in cruise indicate the design has little room for improvement. I have obtained that much difference in cruise than I had before with a RV-6A 180 hp engine and wood prop. I have done numerous modifications and improved the airplane that much. I still have the same gph fuel flow I had before yet cruise 30 mph faster. If anyone who is going to Oshkosh would like to know how you can improve your RV's speed, efficiency and range I will have N157ST on the line at Oshkosh and will post a time at the airplane when I will field questions and also remove the cowling for a look-see. I hope that Dave reads this and I know Scott will and after all is said and done we all will have a little more insight on a good airplane that can be better. P.S. Mark Frederick, I was 8 mph slower than a stock "Rocket" at the Jackpot Race. Respectfully, Steve Barnard Barnard Aircraft Components RV-6A N157ST 1000 hrs flying steve(at)barnardaircraft.com http://www.barnardaircraft.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 17, 1997
From: steve(at)barnardaircraft.com (barnardaircraft)
Subject: Re: RV-6 magazine reviews? (also magazine indexes)
> > > Hello, > > I'm looking for flight tests, reviews, etc. of the RV-6. I assume that >a few should have been done by now, by magazines such as Sport Aviation, >Kitplanes, etc. Hi Jon, You will find an RV-6A Aircraft Performance Report done by the CAFE Foundation in Sport Aviation of September of 1993, page 34. I am intimate with this report because it was my airplane they tested. There is also an Aerodynamic Analysis of the same airplane using VSaero computer software which is in the April 1997 issue of Sport Aviation page 50. Hope this helps and if I can give you any assistance please feel free to call or write. I will be attending Oshkosh and will arrive on Thursday. This particular airplane will be on display and I will field questions and remove the "Holy Cowl" to field questions on that and anything else you may have questions on. Also I will post a short note on the Jackpot, Nevada airplane race that was held in which we had a total of 8 RV's participate. I'll give the details and speeds soon on the RV-list. Does anybody want to know how fast they go, stay tuned. Respectfully, Steve Barnard Barnard Aircraft Components RV-6A N157ST 1000 hrs flying steve(at)barnardaircraft.com http://www.barnardaircraft.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 17, 1997
From: Robert Fritz <Qmax1(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: research info on RV's
This is an open request to whoever it was that I promised to fax some magazine articles. I LOST THE DAMN ADDRESS ON THE WAY TO WORK!!!! pleeeeeese resend :>( Bob Fritz ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 17, 1997
From: Louis Willig <larywil(at)op.net>
Subject: Re: Osh Kosh Sales Lot
<199707141626.LAA22928(at)ns.tuelectric.com> > > > >In reply to the concerns about the general public mingling with aircraft. >One way to possibly suggest that they be careful of the planes is to deny >children under a certain age (8 yrs?) permission to be on the flight line >even if with adults. Anybody for this idea? >Bruce >Starting RV6A after Osh. Bruce, How will we instill an interest in aviation in the children and their parents if we prohibit them from the flight line? You don't want to keep people away. You just want to keep people from damaging your aircraft. I don't have a show aircraft but I did have a show car. So, I know the apprehension you may have with others pawing at your aircraft. I think the EAA will have to do some hard and quick work and prepare an abundance of signage at the gates and maybe at the ends of all or many of the rows of aircraft. These signs must state the rules of etiquette to be used when approaching and examining someone else's aircraft. We were all young once and had to learn to "Be Careful". I hope Dick Knapinski can convince the gang at EAA to spend some time and $$$ for something that doesn't have a return of $$$ attached to it.(Sorry Dick, I couldn't pass up the target of opportunity.) Sincerely, Lou Willig ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 17, 1997
From: RodWoodard <rodwoodard(at)mcione.com>
Subject: RV-8 Wing Kit Shipping Info.
Hello listers: I came home tonight to find a message on my answering machine from Roadway Express. My wing kit is in town and will be delivered tomorrow afternoon. :-) For anyone who's ever wondered how long, how much, etc., here's my info.: I ordered the wing kit about the middle of May. Van's told me it shipped on Monday, July 14. Roadway called me today (July 17) to say that it's in town. The kit consists of 2 boxes. 1 is 200lbs. and the other is 195lbs. Total shipping cost delivered to my door is $152.31. The local Roadway rep. I spoke to this afternoon said that their driver will help me unload it. Loveland, Colorado located along the eastern foothills of the Colorado Rocky Mountains about 50 miles north of Denver. Rod Woodard RV-8, #80033 (Wings delivered tomorrow, drilling stiffners on the rudder tonight) Loveland, Colorado ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 17, 1997
From: "Randy J. Pflanzer" <rpflanze(at)iquest.net>
Subject: Atlanta Bound
To fellow builders in the Atlanta area: I will be in Atlanta on business Friday, July 25th. I'm staying over the weekend on the north side to play some golf. If possible, I'd like to meet with someone who would like to show me their RV-6 or 6a project (or a completed airplane). I'm building a -6 and I'm putting the finishing touches on the fuselage. I'm particularly interested in finished airplanes or ones where you're running the plumbing for the firewall and/or instrument panel wiring (I have lots of questions). I don't know my complete schedule on Saturday and Sunday because my buddies down there are putting together the golf plans, but I'm sure to have time in the afternoons or evenings. Please respond to me off list at rpflanze(at)iquest.net to make some arraingements. Thanks. Randy J. Pflanzer (Indianapolis, RV-6, finishing fuselage) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 17, 1997
From: Dean & Scott Spencer <dspencer(at)kiva.net>
Subject: Re: manifold pressure
Richard Chandler wrote: > > I still don't get it. The only way air (& fuel) is going to get into > > the cylinders is if the pressue in the cylinders is lower than that of > > the surounding air. > > You're confusing the vaccuum of the piston with the pressure in the Manifold. > Try this metaphor. Take your shop vac. The tank of the shop vac is the... EXCELLENT explanation! I was thinking about how to explain this one and was about to reply when I found your reply, Richard. You did much better than I was about to. If you're not a teacher, you should be. Scott N4ZW -CFI/A&P yadeyadeya... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: "Paul Osterman III" <PineRanch(at)msn.com>
Subject: Wanted: Piper Pitot
Eric, You might try Surprise Valley Aviation in Cedarville, Ca (Northeastern Ca) 916 279-2111 Paul Osterman RV6A jigging fuselage Anderson, Ca ---------- From: owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com on behalf of Henson, Eric Sent: Thursday, July 17, 1997 6:20 AM Subject: RV-List: Wanted: Piper Pitot (Henson, Eric) Hi Gang, Sorry for the repost of this issue, I don't have access to the archives or I'd go there first. I'm looking for a Piper pitot tube, used of course. Anyone have any suggestions for their favorite salvage yard. A few weeks ago someone suggested J.T. Evans - no luck there and Wentworth. The # to Wentworth that was posted was not in service. Any help will sure be appreciated, feel free to respond privately. Eric Henson Starting the Tanks ehenson(at)cldwell.attmail.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 17, 1997
From: John Darby <johnd@our-town.com>
Subject: Re: Wanted: Piper Pitot
>I'm looking for a Piper pitot tube, used of course. >Anyone have any suggestions for their favorite salvage yard. Eric; you may want to try Air Salvage of Dallas, Lancaster TX tel # 800-336-6399 or Bobby's Planes 'N Parts at Weatherford TX tel# 817-682-4220 (the 817 may have changed to 254, or is maybe about to). I've bought from both and had no problems with them. John Darby RV6 sold Stephenville TX johnd@our-town.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: Jim Cimino <jcimino(at)epix.net>
Subject: Landing Light
I just installed the landing light in the right wing leading edge(the kit from Van's). Does anyone feel the need for a second landing light in the left wing? Most GA aircraft about this size do fine with one. I'm open for suggestions. Jim Cimino RV-8 sn 80039 http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/5771 (717)842-4057 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: William Costello <bcos(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Landing Light
Jim Cimino wrote: > > > I just installed the landing light in the right wing leading edge(the kit > from Van's). Does anyone feel the need for a second landing light in the > left wing? Most GA aircraft about this size do fine with one. I'm open > for suggestions. > > Jim Cimino Those who have installed 2, focus one closer in and the other further out, for taxiing and landing. In congested areas it also gives you one more light by which to be seen. I am going to install 2 with a switchable flashing capability -- see and be seen. Best regards, Bill Costello -- Bill Costello | bcos(at)ix.netcom.com | Building RV-6 | Reserv N97WC Want an extra hour and a half of energy per day with Super Blue Green products? Email for info or call 800-325-7544 Chicago ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: "Patrick E. Kelley" <patk(at)mail.ic.net>
Subject: Re: Landing Light
Jim Cimino wrote: > > I just installed the landing light in the right wing leading edge(the kit > from Van's). Does anyone feel the need for a second landing light in the > left wing? Most GA aircraft about this size do fine with one. I'm open > for suggestions. One is all you need for landing, but some folks have installed a second light in the other wing for taxiing. This is my plan. PatK - RV-6A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 18, 1997
Subject: Re: airframe options
<< P.S. Mark Frederick, I was 8 mph slower than a stock "Rocket" at the Jackpot Race. Respectfully, Steve Barnard Barnard Aircraft Components >> OK- what are the numbers? Hmmmm- I wonder if we can get a flight in at OSH, as your statement sounds a lot like throwing down the gauntlet.....? Check six! (if you're faster, that's where I'll be!) Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robert.R.F.Ziegler(at)scbvpno.simis.com
Subject: airframe options
Date: - - - , 20-
Importance: normal Autoforwarded: false >>>>>>>>>I still have the same gph fuel flow I had before yet cruise 30 mph faster. If anyone who is going to Oshkosh Steve, some of us are unfortunately too far away this time of the year to go. Could you post perhaps a description of what you did and the sources of the parts here on the list? Thanks Robert (in Congo, Africa) Flying STOL701, starting RV-6A quick build after summer ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: Mark Miertschin <mark(at)compassnet.com>
Subject: Wrong address
Please remove from your mass e-mail list. I have received more than 500 messages in the past four days. I would like this to stop very soon. Thank You. Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: Scott Gesele <scottg(at)icsnet.com>
Subject: Re: airframe options
>Hi Scott, > > I couldn't help but notice one comment above about Van doing such a good >job with the design there really is'nt much if any room for improvement. >Scott, does 30 mph gains in cruise indicate the design has little room for >improvement. I have obtained that much difference in cruise than I had >before with a RV-6A 180 hp engine and wood prop. I have done numerous >modifications and improved the airplane that much. I still have the same >gph fuel flow I had before yet cruise 30 mph faster. > > If anyone who is going to Oshkosh would like to know how you can improve >your RV's speed, efficiency and range I will have N157ST on the line at >Oshkosh and will post a time at the airplane when I will field questions >and also remove the cowling for a look-see. > > I hope that Dave reads this and I know Scott will and after all is said >and done we all will have a little more insight on a good airplane that can >be better. > >P.S. Mark Frederick, I was 8 mph slower than a stock "Rocket" at the >Jackpot Race. > >Respectfully, > >Steve Barnard >Barnard Aircraft Components >RV-6A N157ST 1000 hrs flying >steve(at)barnardaircraft.com >http://www.barnardaircraft.com > > Steve, Exactly what do you attribute your increase in performance from? A vague reply leaves a whole bunch to the imagination. If any of your gains came from a different engine/prop combo, we all know that a 180 C/S will outperform a 150 mis-matched wood prop RV. Granted, your not running a C/S prop, but a wood prop pitched to what a C/S would be at in cruise would produce similar results. I understand that you are now producing a beautiful cowl. Exactly how much gain can you attribute to that? Also, as I understand, your cowl has a lot of work already done on it compared to Van's. The prospective builder who started this thread indicated that he is about to start on a quickbuild. Is it possible that your cowl on a quickbuild would technically violate the 51% rule? The prospective builder wanted to know what aftermarket options are available to increase performance. Without modifying structure (almost impossible with a quickbuild anyway), the builder is left with the following components: cowl, wheel pants, wing tips and wing root fairings. All of these can be changed at a later date. We can increase performance in other ways. Antennas can be installed internally, build the plane straight, keep the weight down, etc. These are decisions to be made during construction, not prior to ordering the kit. I have yet to see verified performance data on the aftermarket components that are starting to show up. It has been said on this list that a particular aftermarket wing tip only increased performance by 2 kts, not the 8-10 that was advertised. Your cowl sounds real interesting. I'm looking forward to seeing REAL data on just how much gains are achieved by this cowl alone. In the mean time, I'm standing by my original statement, "Van's did such a good job designing this plane that there isn't much room for improvement." Note, I didn't say there was NO room for improvement. Decisions made during construction will have the greatest effect on final performance. Bottom line: Build it straight, stock and in accordance with the plans any you will end up with one heck of an airplane. Hope this clears up any confusions. Scott Gesele N506RV ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 19, 1997
From: Frank van der Hulst <frankv(at)pec.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Landing Light
ix.netcom.com!bcos(at)matronics.com wrote: > > Those who have installed 2, focus one closer in and the other further > out, > for taxiing and landing. In congested areas it also gives you one more > light by which to be seen. I am going to install 2 with a switchable > flashing capability -- see and be seen. Me too, for the same reasons. Also, landing lights seem to have a low MTBF. Having two means you've got some redundancy. My plan is to use the small 12V 50W halogen lights designed for track lighting in houses, one in each wingtip. They're cheap and available (NZ$7.15 at my local hardware shop). Frank. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: "les williams" <lesliebwilliams(at)msn.com>
Subject: Landing Light
Jim, I found that it is pretty challenging to taxi around an unfamiliar airport at night without a landing/taxi light. So I will be adding an extra light to my current RV-6A project simply for the redundancy of it. I also found that the 100 watt lamps don't last near as long as the 60 watt standard (which are adequate) as supplied with the Duckworks kits. Les Williams/RV-6AQ/Tacoma WA ---------- From: owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com on behalf of Jim Cimino Sent: Friday, July 18, 1997 12:00 AM Subject: RV-List: Landing Light I just installed the landing light in the right wing leading edge(the kit from Van's). Does anyone feel the need for a second landing light in the left wing? Most GA aircraft about this size do fine with one. I'm open for suggestions. Jim Cimino RV-8 sn 80039 http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/5771 (717)842-4057 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: Don McNamara <mcnamara(at)sbt.infi.net>
Subject: Attn: Barnard Aircraft Components, Inc.
Dear Barnard Aircraft Components: Sorry to bother the whole list, but your e-mail address came back marked "undeliverable." Besides, your answer might be of interest to other RV-listers. What plans, if any, do you have to develop speed mods for the RV-8? And, if you do, when do you expect them to become available? Thanks. --Don McNamara ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ross Mickey" <rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Wanted: Piper Pitot
Date: Jul 18, 1997
I got mine from J.T. Evans Aircraft Sales 1-800-421-1729 or 407-843-4547 Ross Mickey rmickey@ix,netcom.com ---------- > From: Henson, Eric > To: 'rv-list' > Subject: RV-List: Wanted: Piper Pitot > Date: Thursday, July 17, 1997 6:20 AM > RELOSVCS!WESTREG!EHENSON(at)cldwell.attmail.com (Henson, Eric) > > > Hi Gang, > > Sorry for the repost of this issue, I don't have access to the archives or > I'd go there first. I'm looking for a Piper pitot tube, used of course. > Anyone have any suggestions for their favorite salvage yard. A few weeks ago > someone suggested J.T. Evans - no luck there and Wentworth. The # to > Wentworth that was posted was not in service. Any help will sure be > appreciated, feel free to respond privately. > > Eric Henson > Starting the Tanks > ehenson(at)cldwell.attmail.com > > > > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > +-- --+ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: Robert Acker <r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Landing Light
>from Van's). Does anyone feel the need for a second landing light in the >left wing? Most GA aircraft about this size do fine with one. I'm open >for suggestions. >Jim Cimino Jim (and other interested listers): I've got a Van's light that I can sell at discount, new in box, if you decide to go the second light route. Also the stainless pitot tube, and I'm looking to swap a no-tail-light rudder fairing for lighted version. Rob Acker / r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com / RV-6Q ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: Robert Acker <r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Project for sale
No, not mine . I just became aware of a Super Cavalier project for sale. Brand new IO-360, new C/S prop, and new full IFR Collins Microline panel. Asking price $25K...shame to scrap the plane but the rest sounds like a great deal for RV-8 builders here. Rob Acker / r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com / RV-6Q ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Btinn(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 18, 1997
Subject: Re: RV-6 magazine reviews? (also magazine indexes)
Yes, Steve, tell us how fast the RVs go. I have a friend who is a backwards plastic airplane driver in such shows as Jackpot who commented that there were enough RVs this year to have their own heat. In fact, he said that there were so many contestants that the last heats of the day were flown in such rough air that it made shoulder harness almost mandatory to even stay inside the airplanes. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Oil cooler question
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: "Derrick L. Aubuchon" <n184da(at)cctrap.com>
I know there has been much discussion on this list regarding oil coolers, and I have been able to locate most of the info I need from the archives,, such as which port is which for plumbing the oil cooler lines. But I have a question,, Which port is which on Vans oil cooler?? Is it better to set up the flow to fill the cooler from bottom to top?? Or visa versa? This may seem like a silly question to most of you,, but I am curious as to the accepted method. Thanks in advance,,, Derrick L. Aubuchon n184da(at)cctrap.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: hrschbrg(at)ix.netcom.com (Barry & Shelly Hirschberg)
Subject: RV-6, partially completed, for sale
Due to time constraints and the final realization that I will not be able to complete my RV-6 within the next few years, mine is now for sale. Empennage is complete except glass portion. Wing spars are finished as well as most of right wing. I live just south of San Francisco and so does the kit for now. Send your offer. Please respond directly to me via e-mail as I do not check the RV-list mail regularly. Barry Hirschberg hrschbrg(at)ix.netcom.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kerrjb(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 18, 1997
Subject: Re: airframe options
<< I couldn't help but notice one comment above about Van doing such a good job with the design there really is'nt much if any room for improvement. Scott, does 30 mph gains in cruise indicate the design has little room for improvement. I have obtained that much difference in cruise than I had before with a RV-6A 180 hp engine and wood prop >> Steve, I worked for a major jet engine manufacturer for 33 years as an aero engineer and when any one quoted numbers that were REAL good, they were usually referred to as "fan-tastic". 30 mph increase over a well done 180 hp RV-6A is something I would give my eyeteeth for. I will be at O-K and look forward to hearing and seeing what you did. Bernie Kerr RV-6A all wing spars riveted, mounting spars and ribs to jig. Did not buy stock wheel pants or tips. Maybe made a mistake buying cowling. Hope to fly next year ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: steve(at)barnardaircraft.com (barnardaircraft)
Subject: Jackpot Race results
This post covers the Jackpot, Nevada R.A.C.E. results. This race is sponsored by Rutan and Composite enthusiasts. They have numerous races for experimental aircraft throughout the year. All airplanes are welcome. This particular race was held in Jackpot, Nevada which is at the northwest corner of Nevada near the Utah and Idaho border and was held on the July 4th weekend. These particular races have been held for about 20 to 25 years so it's not new. The race is approximately 125 statute miles with a race altitude of 7500 ft. with 2 turns in the race. The density altitude was about 9500 ft. There was 4 heat races with the RV-Class consisting of 8 aircraft, 2 Harmon Rockets, 3 RV 4's, 2 RV-6's and a RV-6A. It is an air start with a pace plane similar to Reno air races except we start in a straight and level condition. Equal amounts of planes on each side of the pace plane. Go the 125 miles and 2 turns and see who comes back first. The results of the RV class and Super Rv class for Rockets were as follows: Super RV Mark Sponsler Harmon Rocket IO-540 239.13 mph Gary Rudolph Harmon Rocket IO-540 226.13 mph RV Dave Anders RV-4 IO-360 236.42 mph Steve Barnard RV-6A IO-360 217.50 Tracy Saylor RV-6 0-360 212.30 Ken Brock RV-4 IO-320 202.00 Mike Marker RV-4 0-360 200.78 Steve Colwell RV-6 0-360 191.92 These speeds were off of last years speeds by approximately 5 mph low because of windy conditions A Glasair 111 ran 269.56 mph A Berkut with a IO-540 ran 252.53 mph Top Long-EZ ran 222.31 running in the Super Stock class 0-320 Respectfully, Steve Barnard Barnard Aircraft Components RV-6A N157ST 1000 hrs flying steve(at)barnardaircraft.com http://www.barnardaircraft.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: steve(at)barnardaircraft.com (barnardaircraft)
Subject: Re: airframe options
I knew that would get your attention Mark. If you notice I said I was slower. I will post the race results in another message labeled Jackpot Race results. In that I will list real numbers of 8 RV's that ran their own heat race, pretty neat stuff and just a ball to participate in. Tell you all about the course etc. Then you can phone John H. with the results but he may already know. And hey really do check your six, I'm coming up behind you when you least expect it. Rat a tat, tat. > > ><< P.S. Mark Frederick, I was 8 mph slower than a stock "Rocket" at the > Jackpot Race. > > Respectfully, > > Steve Barnard > Barnard Aircraft Components >> > >OK- what are the numbers? Hmmmm- I wonder if we can get a flight in at OSH, >as your statement sounds a lot like throwing down the gauntlet.....? > >Check six! (if you're faster, that's where I'll be!) >Mark Respectfully, Steve Barnard Barnard Aircraft Components RV-6A N157ST 1000 hrs flying steve(at)barnardaircraft.com http://www.barnardaircraft.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: spjohnsn(at)ix.netcom.com (Stephen Paul Johnson)
Subject: Re: Landing Light
You wrote: > > >I just installed the landing light in the right wing leading edge(the kit >from Van's). Does anyone feel the need for a second landing light in the >left wing? Most GA aircraft about this size do fine with one. I'm open >for suggestions. > > >Jim Cimino >RV-8 sn 80039 >http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/5771 >(717)842-4057 > > Hi Jim, I opted for two myself. Two basic reasons - if you have one burn out, you have a spare, and second, one can be aimed to illuminate the runway length in the stalled attitude just before touchdown, and the other can be aimed to shine down the length of the runway in the level flight attitude. How did the installation go? Steve Johnson RV-8 #80121 > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > +-- --+ > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: mauser(at)claris.com (Richard Chandler)
Subject: Re: manifold pressure
> Richard Chandler wrote: > > You're confusing the vaccuum of the piston with the pressure in > > the Manifold. Try this metaphor. Take your shop vac. The tank of > > the shop vac is the... > > EXCELLENT explanation! Thank you. > I was thinking about how to explain this one and was about to reply when > I found your reply, Richard. You did much better than I was about to. > If you're not a teacher, you should be. What?! Then I'd _NEVER_ be able to afford to build an RV. :-) (As it is, I had a big setback when I had to close out my last student loan in order to stop the loan company from ripping me off any more. I now have 7K on a credit card (Which still has an introductory rate, thank goodness.) Ever had late fees added to your principal with no notification? It really sucks.) -- Richard Chandler RV-6: Garage bought and being finished, saving for tools and tail kit. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Andy Gold" <winterland(at)theharddrive.net>
Subject: Ride wanted to Oshkosh from Denver area
Date: Jul 18, 1997
Is anybody going to Oshkosh (flying or driving) who will be departing fro= m, or passing through the Denver area? If so, do you have room for one = person for the trip out. (Just one way, please) Please call me at 970 887-2207 (days) or 970 887-2194 (eves) or respond = back to this address. Obviously, I am glad to share the driving/flying = and fuel expenses. Thanks, Andy Gold RV-6A N-5060 (first flight last week) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: Dennis Jackson <denny(at)transport.com>
Subject: Wally Olsen Gone
Hey Gang, If any of you know Wally, you will want to know that he slipped the surly bonds of earth for the last time yesterday. I'm one of thousands who can say that he was the first instructor I had and I'm one of thousands who will really miss the old cuss. What a legend! When I get more time I'll try to post a story or two about him here. Fair skies, Wally. DJ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: Richard Bibb <rbibb(at)fore.com>
Subject: Progess Report
Over 12 years ago (!) I bought S/N 1187 for an RV-4. I actually started construction in 1988. After a decade of actual building I have my inspection scheduled with a DER for next Friday. Gonna spend the weekend finishing up a few odds and ends (placard panel, weight and balance, etc.). Before you ask why it took so long I will just say - there was a lot of other things going on and I moved three times in the middle of the process. Also, divorce lawyers tend to eat up extra cash faster than airplane projects. Enough about that. Anyway, I've had it on the gear in fast taxi mode and it tracks true and handles great on the ground. So, if all goes to according to plan (and not much has in the last 10 years so I'm prepared for anything) N144KT (that's ONE - 4 FOR Katie [daughter]) will be airborne about the time a lot of you make the pilgrimage to OSH to celebrate the birth of the species. I'll keep the list posted and for you builders out there - NO it should NOT take anywhere near that long but I STILL think it is worth it.... Richard Bibb RV-4 N144KT PS - RVer's in the DC area - its at Manassas, Hanger 4 West Side ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: "Grant E. Young" <gyoung(at)crl.nmsu.edu>
Subject: Re: Jackpot Race results
Steve, Many thanks for the Jackpot race results. I would be very interested in your opinions (and others) as to the reasons for the LARGE speed differences between RVs with 'similar' engines. Are we talking some serious "real HP" differences due to engine mods/prop issues, or are we talking about aerodynamic differences being responsible for the majority of variance in these numbers. I have to believe that power is playing a large role here since I am assuming all RVs entered were fairly clean. grant- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "rick Jorgensen" <rpjorgen(at)dcn.davis.ca.us>
Subject: Re: RV-6, partially completed, for sale
Date: Jul 18, 1997
i'm interested. I live in davis, ca. how much is the kit? are you selling any tools? thanks for the info ---------- > Hirschberg) > > Due to time constraints and the final realization that I will not be = able > to complete my RV-6 within the next few years, mine is now for sale. > Empennage is complete except glass portion. Wing spars are finished = as > well as most of right wing. I live just south of San Francisco and so = does > the kit for now. Send your offer. Please respond directly to me via > e-mail as I do not check the RV-list mail regularly. > > Barry Hirschberg > hrschbrg(at)ix.netcom.com > > > > > > +-- = --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.c= om | > | --- = | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request@matronics= .com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or sub= ject. | > +-- = --+ > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Landing Light
From: tcraig-stearman(at)juno.com (John T. Craig-Stearman)
Date: Jul 18, 1997
> Does anyone feel the need for a second landing light in the left wing? Most GA >aircraft about this size do fine with one. I'm open for suggestions. > I installed the Bob Olds landing light kit: one 130W halogen high/low beam automotive headlight in each wing. Having an extra light for redundancy is a wise practice. A friend of mine lost the only landing light in his Citabria while landing at a VERY dark unfamiliar country airstrip on a moonless night. The next morning we discovered hills and tall trees on both ends that we never saw the night before. He made it all right, but it was no fun. The Bob Olds kit allows both lamps to operate as either taxi or landing lights (or even both at the same time, depending on how you wire them.) I saw them in operation on a friend's RV-4 at night, and the amount of illumination was impressive. After the experience noted above, I decided it is hard to have too much light. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: halk(at)sybase.com (Hal Kempthorne)
Subject: Arlington
Hi all, What a show! I took a friend who I think ought to build an RV. We arrived Saturday - almost noon by the time the Cessna in front of us got his wheel out of the hole in the grass. We moved immediately to the picnic and were greeted by 14 RVs taxiing past us. Then a fly by. Then a wonderful picnic lunch! I got a real good look at the Chevy V-6 installation which was very tidy. I asked Van what he thought of it and he said, "I haven't had time to take a look at it". I saw but never did get over to the retractable. I don't really want another headache tho they are sexy! We flew home right after the show. Hal Kempthorne RV-6AQ -- On main gear - panel stuff halk(at)sybase.com Santa Clara, CA. Debonair N6134V @ SJC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: halk(at)sybase.com (Hal Kempthorne)
Subject: Re: manifold pressure
Hi all, Am I beating a dead horse or what? Manifold pressure gauges measure the same thing that the automotive vacuum gauges measure. They display it differently. MP is just the air pressure in inches of mercury in the intake manifold. The vac gauge is set to zero on a standard day and displays the difference. Engines develop power in proportion to four parameters: P Pressure on the top of the piston (brake mean effective pressure - BMEP) the average pressure - alter by changing compression ratio etc L Length of stroke - alter with a change of crankshaft and more A Area of the cylinder bores - (not actually piston surface!) - rebore oversize N Number of revolutions per minute - alter with cam and breathing changes In the car, if you suddenly give it full throttle while at low speed but in high gear the manifold vacuum drops a few inches. If you subtract this from atmospheric pressure, you get manifold pressure. So if it is a 29.92 standard day and the vacuum drops to 4.0 inches, the manifold pressure is 29.92 - 4.0 or about 26 inches. But the engine is turning out very little power because "N" (RPMs) is so low. Back off a little on the throttle but shift (if you've never shifted before, ask some old fart) into the appropriate gear. You will probably get a lower manifold pressure but higher "N" so you will be putting out more power. Power is proportional to PLAN. The constant speed prop is like an automatic transmission, sorta. You set the RPM desired and the prop changes pitch to allow it. In climb, the pitch is flatter so that the prop is at a lower angle of attack and the engine can rev up to produce high power. If the engine produces it's maximum horsepower at 2500 rpm and is redlined at 2600 rpm, what rpm will give the best rate of climb? I heard that 1800 rpm is a more efficient prop speed so why do we run at 2500? So Honda has an engine and the prop is driven at 1700 or so rpm.? I worked this out when I bought my Debonair five years ago.. I set the RPM to 2500 and the MP to 25" on takeoff from SJC. I try to keep it there, but alas, the MP soon starts to drop even with the knob all the way in. At 10,000 the atmospheric pressure is down about 19 or 20 inches so I can't do better than that without turbo. I've had flight instructors say, "Just set it like the book says". Hal Kempthorne RV-6AQ -- On main gear - panel stuff halk(at)sybase.com Santa Clara, CA. Debonair N6134V @ SJC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: kevin lane <n3773(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Wally Olsen Gone
Date: Jul 19, 1997
> >Hey Gang, > >If any of you know Wally, you will want to know that he slipped the >surly bonds of earth for the last time yesterday. I'm one of thousands >who can say that he was the first instructor I had and I'm one of >thousands who will really miss the old cuss. What a legend! When I get >more time I'll try to post a story or two about him here. Fair skies, >Wally. > >DJ > > I learned to fly at Wally's Evergreen Field. It took a while to realize that it wasn't typical to simply shake hands, climb into a 50 yr. old t-craft and start your first lesson. I soloed in N96202, probably the millionth PIC since Lindbergh rented that very plane. "yup, the T-craft is a good plane", he'd say, "got a good wing, yessir, got a good wing". would be the thing to do. That plane would last him his whole life" Our world is in constant change. When someone like Wally holds it back for a while we get a precious glimpse of our past and the wisdom of another generation. kevin ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jacquelyn eastburn" <jimnjax(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Wally Olsen
Date: Jul 18, 1997
I hope the rest of the list will allow us these words about Wally, you see the northwest has just lost an icon in general aviation. thousands of us flew with Wally including myself. my son soloed with Wally in t-craft 96202. both of us racked up many hours in Wallys t-crafts and champ. they sometimes looked like hell, but you always felt safe and comfortable knowing you were flying one of Wally's airplanes. like Kevin said in a post before me, Wally also told me that if you wanted a good airplane, build yourself one. I asked, how about an RV? yeah yeah he said "can't go wrong with an RV". I doubt that I will ever meet a man who knows more about flying, not talking about gizmos, just flying. thanks Wally, you did a good job here. jimnjax(at)worldnet.att.net Hillsboro Oregon RV - 8 Ser. No. 80079 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 19, 1997
Subject: Re: Oil cooler question
<< Which port is which on Vans oil cooler?? Is it better to set up the flow to fill the cooler from bottom to top?? Or visa versa?>> IMO the lower 3/8"NPT output port from the acc case (pressure side) should go to the bottom port of the cooler to fill from the bottom up, otherwise you are fighting father physics. If you have a Lyc type spin-on oil filter adapter, you will need to have a 45 degree end on this hose. The output (top) port of the cooler returns to the top 3/8"NPT on the acc case. -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 18, 1997
From: RodWoodard <rodwoodard(at)mcione.com>
Subject: RV-8 Wing Kit Arrives
Hello all: Roadway delivered my wing kit today. It's amazing how much stuff is crammed into two relatively small boxes. I haven't pulled the skins out of the flat box yet, but nothing in the long skinny box or the top part of the flat box was damaged. I'm not looking forward to inventorying it all. There are quite few things in there that I don't recognize. One thing I _did_ notice is that they sent a piece of channel labeled for another HS-614. How'd they know I was into building that part over and over! I could have used that freebie a year ago when I first screwed that part up. :-) For any of you who haven't seen the new RV-8 spars, they're worth a look. It's too bad there isn't a way to put a clear skin on those wings. The spar is nothing short of a work of art. I'm finally into working on my project every night. I'm even turning down opportunities to go fly in favor of building on the airplane. I can't believe how much I really enjoy the building process. It's easy for me to see why people end up building more than one of these things. Keep building. Rod Woodard Loveland, Colorado RV-8, #80033, Drilled 1/2 the rudder stiffners tonight. Other half plus priming & riveting tomorrow ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "mcomeaux" <mcomeaux(at)cmc.net>
Subject: RV6A QB
Date: Jul 18, 1997
Are there any builders of RV6QB in Central Ore? Near Bend or Sunriver. Mike Comeaux mcomeaux(at)cmc.net 6A emp ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JRWillJR(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 19, 1997
Subject: Re: Osh Kosh Sales Lot
I understand that we airplane people need to be inclusive were the general public is concerned. Future pilots and an informed public are a good cause. I am all for this as long as they are not standing on top of my airplane. Some of you guys probably have large incomes and money to burn. When one is gone you can just buy another. I, however, must save for months and years to produce a finished product not to mention the large investment in time. If the EAA . is going to let the public into our fly-in then they should shoulder some responsibility for monitoring their guests and offer financial restitution when damage is done. Apparently the EAA has the funds to buy fuel for some performers and airshow a\c so they will continue to come each year and make the affair a success---- so what is going to happen if fewer and fewer homebuilts show up due to the real and\or imagined potential for damage to our a\c. If an a\c is damaged by non-aviation guests then maybe the EAA should carry some of the repair burden. However storms and acts of God are probably more danger and the EAA cannot be responsible for such things. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 19, 1997
From: Denny Harjehausen <retflygtiger(at)proaxis.com>
Subject: Re: Progess Report
> >I'll keep the list posted and for you builders out there - NO it should NOT >take anywhere near that long but I STILL think it is worth it.... > > >Richard Bibb >RV-4 N144KT Good to hear some progress. Congradulations Richard. That has to feel great. Have a Great Day! Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH Fuselage-top side Lebanon, OR ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 19, 1997
From: Dean & Scott Spencer <dspencer(at)kiva.net>
Subject: Re: manifold pressure
> > If you're not a teacher, you should be. > > What?! Then I'd _NEVER_ be able to afford to build an RV. :-) > I now have 7K on > a credit card (Which still has an introductory rate, thank goodness.) > Richard Chandler > RV-6: Garage bought and being finished, saving for tools and tail kit. -Know how you feel. I'm a 30 yr old general aviation/Bell helicopter mech. In case you don't know, GA mechs don't get rich fast (we're one notch above flight instructors). My progress has been slowed considerably by the need to work a lot to pay the parts bills (I've become a master of the introductory card rate). However, I must say that after several years in & around the industry (EAA since '82) I feel that the RV series has everyone beat hands down in the value department (not to mention looks and performance) If it weren't for this and a few lucky breaks, I'd be fortunate to be building an ultralight. Scott N4ZW -1/2 painting done and almost ready to put all the big pieces together. 2 months? 6 mo? a year? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 19, 1997
From: "r.acker" <r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Landing Light and For Sale Repost
Listers, Sorry if this turns out to be a re-post, but my original messages sent over 24 hours ago have not shown up on the list, so I thought I'd try again. Regarding the second landing light, I have a new in box Van's unit for sale at discount. Also a stainless pitot tube, and looking to swap a no-light-rudder fairing for lighted version. I have also become aware of a Super Cavalier project for sale, brand new IO-360, new C/S prop, and new IFR Collins Microline panel. For $25K total it would be a great deal for the RV-8 builders here...if interested please e-mail back privately (I possibly want the aiframe and panel). Rob Acker / r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com / RV-6Q ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mikel(at)dimensional.com
Date: Jul 19, 1997
Subject: Re: Landing Light
>Also, landing lights seem to have a low MTBF. Ok.....I should know this......I'm a pilot and builder......should know these abbreviations......feeling kinda stupid for not knowing......letsee, here.....extrapolate.....BF: between or before failure. Yeah, that's gotta be it. Ok: MT .....mean time.....uh....yeah, something like that.....that's the idea, anyway..... Cool. Another abbreviation I can use. ;>) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 19, 1997
From: Thomas Velvick <rver(at)caljet.com>
Subject: Re: Landing Light and For Sale Repost
> > and looking to swap a >no-light-rudder fairing for lighted version. > Call Vans, they offered to swap mine if I sent it back to them Regards Tom Velvick rver(at)caljet.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Btinn(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 19, 1997
Subject: Re: manifold pressure
This discussion could well have happened in my physics classes. I was glad to see someone get around to explaining why a gas moves from one place to another. Instead of using the concept of "suction" to "pull" gas into the cylinder it is better to think of it as being "pushed" into the cylinder by the higher pressure of the gas in the manifold. The gas is also "pushed" into the manifold by the higher pressure yet of the atmosphere on the outside of the carburetor. This pressure can also be further augmented by a turbo or supercharger to mechanically force even more air into the manifold. The air (a gas) is constantly flowing from areas of higher pressure to those of lower pressure. It does this everywhere in nature. Look at weather systems of high and low pressure areas, deflating balloons, etc. We refer to this as a law of thermodynamics, but there is nothing mysterious about it. There are also several scales or methods to use to measure these pressures. Probably the most meaningful one to use in this application is to measure the ABSOLUTE pressure of the gases using some convenient scale. Atmospheric pressures are usually measured in millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) using a manometer or barometer. (We could also have used lb/sq in, Nt/m^2, etc.) In some of this discussion it appears that someone was using what we sometimes call "gage" pressure, which is simply the difference between atmospheric pressure and the pressure in a container. This pressure can be either positive or negative-greater or less than atmospheric pressure. This is what we usually use to measure tire pressure. A GAGE pressure of 30 lb/in^2 would be equivalent to an ABSOLUTE pressure of the atmosphere (~ 14.7 lb/in^2) plus 30 lb/ in^2 for a total of 44.7 lb/in^2. Since the manifold pressure typically will run at an absolute pressure of something less than atmospheric pressure, it would have a gage pressure that would be negative - what we sometimes refer to as a "vacuum"- if we were measuring it with an ordinary pressure gage. If a tire had an absolute pressure of 10 lb/in^2 inside then a gage would read -4.7 lb/ in^2. It still has air in it (although less than the same volume of atmosphere would have) but I will guarantee you that sucker will still be "flat" when you take your car or plane off the jacks. (I know - "on the bottom side only.") The only problem with this is that you would have to use a"vacuum pump" on that tire to achieve such a pressure. You can't get it with something as simple as a nail. There are other ways of explaining this phenomenon and several have been used in the discussion to date - most quite valid. If I were to explain it to my physics students, however, I think the approach I used above would be understood by the largest number of students. I can relate to the teaching salary problem. I learned to fly in the late 1940s and early 50s, attended college and graduate school. I was able to do some flying all that time and when I was first married even after starting my career as a physics/physical science teacher. After the boys were born, however, the flying stopped for about 25 years. It was too expensive even in 1970s dollars. I have been active again for about 4-5 years and am now retired. I can afford to fly some now as a club member in a C-172 and Grumman Cheetah but it still is out of the question to buy a plane outright. That is why I'm building my RV-6A. As long as I can keep my medical I think this will give me the most bang for the flying buck. Thirty six years of teaching was rewarding, but not financially. (Sure am glad I didn't go ahead and put my money down on one of the Idaho Rotax cages that you cover with bedsheets and strap on your buttocks.) Class dismissed for today. Sorry for the long dissertation. Bob Tinnell Salem, OR RV-6A Wings pretty well along/Fuselage in the box. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Btinn(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 19, 1997
Subject: Re: RV6A QB
I dont know anyone in Sunriver or bend who is building a QB but ther may very well be several there. I do know of a few in the Albany, Corvallis, and Salem area, however. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 19, 1997
From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <RNuckolls(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: New E-Mail address . . .
rv-list I think I'll be closing my CIS account in a few weeks. Suggest that everyone with an interest change their address books for us to send mail via our website at www.aeroelectric.com I've shut off the list server activity until after OSH . . . too many things to do to get ready. Will sign up again after OSH with the new address. In the mean time, will try to answer mail to the website. Check out our new website, we've been able to spend some time on it the past two weeks and we've hired some help. It will be changing almost daily for the next several months. Come see us at OSH! My OSH schedule published on the website. Regards, Bob . . . = AeroElectric Connection //// (o o) =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3DoOOo=3D(_)=3DoOOo=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D | | | Go ahead, make my day . . . | | Show me where I'm wrong. | =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D http://www.aeroelectric.com = ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GHLX34A(at)prodigy.com (MR GEORGE T KILISHEK)
Date: Jul 19, 1997
Subject: RV-8 Wing Kit Arrives
Rod: Your note said: " One thing I _did_ notice is that they sent a piece of channel labeled for another HS-614. How'd they know I was into building that part over and over! I could have used that freebie a year ago when I first screwed that part up. :-)". That "freebie" angle is required to make the seat brackets on the center section assembly. Don't throw it away or make a Christmas tree stand out of it! Have fun as you finish the empennage and plunge into the wings. George RV-8 SN 80006. Fuel tanks. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Andy Gold" <winterland(at)theharddrive.net>
Subject: Nose wheel shimmy
Date: Jul 19, 1997
After about a dozen landings in my new RV-6A, I'me having a problem which= has developed on my last two flights. On landing, as soon as the nose = wheel touches down and then until the speed gets below 30ish there is a = tremendous vibration and the nose wheel feels like it is about to rip its= elf off. I was very happy when it slowed down and stopped, and was invisi= oning my new RV nose down on the runway minus a prop and most of the lowe= r cowl. I imagine this is nose wheel shimmy and the tightening nut needs to be = brought back to specs with the correct breakout pressure re-set. My question is whether it is common that this adjustment needs to be rout= inely checked and tightened; or does it typically just need to be re-adju= sted just once after a few hours after everything gets a chance to "settl= e into place". There was absolutely no sign of this vibration during my first 8-10 landi= ngs. Then, on the 11th or 12th landing the problem suddenly came to be. = There is also no problem on take-off and I only guess that when the speed= gets high enough to cause the (shimmy?) there is enough weight off the = wheel to prevent it. Had anybody else had this experience who can say whether my diagnosis is = correct or if I should be looking in other areas? Andy Gold RV-6A N-5060 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 19, 1997
Subject: Re: airframe options
<< And hey really do check your six, I'm coming up behind you when you least expect it. Rat a tat, tat. >> I have my finger on the smoke sys switch for when I maneuver into your 12 o'clock.......;-) Check six! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 19, 1997
From: "r.acker" <r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Landing Light and For Sale Repost
>> and looking to swap a >>no-light-rudder fairing for lighted version. >Call Vans, they offered to swap mine if I sent it back to them >Tom Velvick I'm aware of Van's policies, I was trying to save myself and Van's some trouble by swapping directly with another lister. Thanks, Rob Acker / r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com / RV-6Q ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 19, 1997
From: Jim Cimino <jcimino(at)epix.net>
Subject: Re: RV-8 Wing Kit Arrives
Rod, Good luck on your wing. I'm waiting on my fuse, hope it will be here soon. I have the right wing all drilled. I think the part your referring to in your message was an 814 not the 614. Enjoy your kit. > >Hello all: > >Roadway delivered my wing kit today. It's amazing how much stuff is crammed >into two relatively small boxes. I haven't pulled the skins out of the flat >box yet, but nothing in the long skinny box or the top part of the flat box >was damaged. I'm not looking forward to inventorying it all. There are >quite few things in there that I don't recognize. One thing I _did_ notice >is that they sent a piece of channel labeled for another HS-614. How'd they >know I was into building that part over and over! I could have used that >freebie a year ago when I first screwed that part up. :-) > >For any of you who haven't seen the new RV-8 spars, they're worth a look. >It's too bad there isn't a way to put a clear skin on those wings. The spar >is nothing short of a work of art. > >I'm finally into working on my project every night. I'm even turning down >opportunities to go fly in favor of building on the airplane. I can't >believe how much I really enjoy the building process. It's easy for me to >see why people end up building more than one of these things. > >Keep building. > >Rod Woodard >Loveland, Colorado >RV-8, #80033, Drilled 1/2 the rudder stiffners tonight. Other half plus >priming & riveting tomorrow > > > > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > +-- --+ > > Jim Cimino RV-8 sn 80039 http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/5771 (717)842-4057 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 19, 1997
From: Jim Cimino <jcimino(at)epix.net>
Subject: Landing Light Installation
Well, it seems that most people feel two lights are almost a must. I had a Cessna 172 a few years back and spent more time landing with an inoperable light than a working one. Landing at most airports without a light is not a problem, I have never found them to illuminate much before touch-down anyway. But taxiing and being seen are other considerations. I will be putting a second light in. I did run into one snag though during the installation. I cannot understand how I'm supposed to mount the reflector to the main bracket. The hole is cut and drilled for nutplates, but the reflector does not reach that area. Am I supposed to make some kind of bracket and rivit to the reflector and then nutplate it to the bracket? I wonder if this is a new style light they're using and didn't notice that there were no provisions for mounting. There is no mention in the instructions. I called Duckworks, he called back the next day, but I was not home. I guess I'll try again next week. Jim Cimino RV-8 sn 80039 http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/5771 (717)842-4057 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JamesCone(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 19, 1997
Subject: Re: Nose wheel shimmy
This nose wheel shimmy is a result of the bearings and other parts getting settled in. As the roughness is reduced by wear, there is less friction and therefore the nose wheel can shimmy. Just tighten the bolt on the bottom of the nose gear to achieve the desired side pressure again and your problem will be solved. When you repack the bearing at annual time, be sure to tighten the nut after about 10 landings and you will be OK. I ruined my steering stop with a nose gear shimmy after about 10 landings because I didn't recheck the side force required to turn the wheel. I now do this more often and have not had a repeat of the problem. Jim Cone jamescone(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 20, 1997
From: "les williams" <lesliebwilliams(at)msn.com>
Subject: Nose wheel shimmy
Andy, I never experienced nose wheel shimmy in 350 hrs and never had to re-adjust the breakout pressure on my -6A. I did have some infrequent main gear shimmy, particularly if I had over 30 lbs tire pressure in the mains. I think the nose gear had 25 lbs. I would re-check the pull force to see if it is still in spec, tire pressure, wheel bearing adjustment and tire clearances from fairing. I would also check the gear leg, socket, and retaining bolt for any loose condition. Hope whatever you find is simple to cure! Les Williams/RV-6AQ ---------- From: owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com on behalf of Andy Gold Sent: Saturday, July 19, 1997 5:33 PM Subject: RV-List: Nose wheel shimmy After about a dozen landings in my new RV-6A, I'me having a problem which= has developed on my last two flights. On landing, as soon as the nose = wheel touches down and then until the speed gets below 30ish there is a = tremendous vibration and the nose wheel feels like it is about to rip its= elf off. I was very happy when it slowed down and stopped, and was invisi= oning my new RV nose down on the runway minus a prop and most of the lowe= r cowl. I imagine this is nose wheel shimmy and the tightening nut needs to be = brought back to specs with the correct breakout pressure re-set. My question is whether it is common that this adjustment needs to be rout= inely checked and tightened; or does it typically just need to be re-adju= sted just once after a few hours after everything gets a chance to "settl= e into place". There was absolutely no sign of this vibration during my first 8-10 landi= ngs. Then, on the 11th or 12th landing the problem suddenly came to be. = There is also no problem on take-off and I only guess that when the speed= gets high enough to cause the (shimmy?) there is enough weight off the = wheel to prevent it. Had anybody else had this experience who can say whether my diagnosis is = correct or if I should be looking in other areas? Andy Gold RV-6A N-5060 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 19, 1997
From: Richard Bibb <rbibb(at)fore.com>
Subject: Mixture question
My mixture control doesn't seem to effect anything. Question: What is a good initial setting on a Marvel Carb (O-320-E2D) for the idle mixture screw. How much to adjust it to obtain "idle cutoff", e.g. 1/4 turn per adjustment of 1 "click"? How do tell if the mixture is working properly? Baffled by this one.... Richard PS - Anyone got a Marvel Carb manual and/or overhaul guide they will part with/copy for a reasonable fee? Richard E. Bibb Direct: 301-571-2507 Vice President, Federal Operations Main: 301-564-4404 Fore Systems Federal, Inc. FAX: 301-564-4408 6905 Rockledge Drive, #800 Pager: 800-719-1246 Bethesda, MD 20817 www.fore.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 19, 1997
From: Richard Bibb <rbibb(at)fore.com>
Subject: Re: Progess Report
Thanks for the reply. Working on solving a baffling problem with the mixture (Misture control appears to have NO effect). Finished safetying a few nuts today. Placraded controls. Gonna be ready Friday. Rb > >> >>I'll keep the list posted and for you builders out there - NO it should NOT >>take anywhere near that long but I STILL think it is worth it.... >> >> >>Richard Bibb >>RV-4 N144KT > > Good to hear some progress. Congradulations Richard. That has to >feel great. > >Have a Great Day! > >Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH > Fuselage-top side > Lebanon, OR > > > > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > +-- --+ > > Richard E. Bibb Direct: 301-571-2507 Vice President, Federal Operations Main: 301-564-4404 Fore Systems Federal, Inc. FAX: 301-564-4408 6905 Rockledge Drive, #800 Pager: 800-719-1246 Bethesda, MD 20817 www.fore.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 20, 1997
From: "L. Coats" <lcoats(at)wave.co.nz>
Subject: Incident almost accident
Confession time! Well, I am one of those pilots that does a thorough preflight check prior to every flight and do the standard run up and the DVA's and today I made a mistake. Today a fellow RV pilot of a -6 was having trouble with his engine and it was running rough so I was waiting at the end of runway 11 with him to see if the problem was going to clear. My canopy is a tip -up and whilst idling at 1200rpm this vibrates so I leave the canopy latch undone (side one) with the top latch that twists under the roll over bar, locked, until I do my DVA's. My check list was interrupted when the other pilot reported his engine was running OK. Well, you have probably guessed it - the canopy suddenly sprung open at about 700ft! Sort-of grabs your attention as it is suddenly very cold, very windy and you can't hear any engine running and lose maps start flying around the cockpit. Van's words in an RVator suddenly sprung to mind - 'fly the plane' so I did't do anything about the canopy which was lifted about a foot high. (I didn't have a passenger today so there was no one to hold the canopy either). Now, when this happens you will find that as the airspeed slows the canopy lifts even further. I did a circuit at 700ft and landed on 23 and had to land viewing out the side as the canopy was obstructing the view ahead. Unfortunately our runways are short in length - 11 is 590 ft and 23 being a bit longer at 618 ft - so as there was neglible wind I thought it would be wiser to land on a longer runway and slightly faster than normal 65kts (haven't tested the stall speed with the canopy unlatched!). For those of you that have nice long runways I suspect that if you land at a higher airspeed you will have better visibility over the nose. I post this in the hope that if anyone else experiences this phenomenon they remember Van's words to 'fly the plane' and to also illustrate how a brief distraction during the checks can be disasterous. L. Coats RV6 ZK-RVL 196.2hr ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 19, 1997
From: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Incident almost accident
L. Coats wrote: > > Well, you have probably guessed it - the canopy suddenly sprung open > at > about 700ft! Sort-of grabs your attention as it is suddenly very > cold, > very windy and you can't hear any engine running and lose maps start > flying > around the cockpit. Van's words in an RVator suddenly sprung to mind > - > 'fly the plane' so I did't do anything about the canopy which was > lifted > about a foot high. (I didn't have a passenger today so there was no > one to > hold the canopy either). Now, when this happens you will find that > as the > airspeed slows the canopy lifts even further. I did a circuit at > 700ft and > landed on 23 and had to land viewing out the side as the canopy was > obstructing the view ahead. Unfortunately our runways are short in > length > - 11 is 590 ft and 23 being a bit longer at 618 ft - so as there was > neglible wind I thought it would be wiser to land on a longer runway > and > slightly faster than normal 65kts (haven't tested the stall speed with > the > canopy unlatched!). For those of you that have nice long runways I > suspect > that if you land at a higher airspeed you will have better visibility > over > the nose. > I post this in the hope that if anyone else experiences this > phenomenon they > remember Van's words to 'fly the plane' and to also illustrate how a > brief > distraction during the checks can be disasterous. > > L. Coats RV6 ZK-RVL 196.2hr > > +-- > When I first atarted flying my RV-6 I had the canopy come unlatched in flight and you are right it does get your attention. It opened about as you describe but I was able to slow down and pull the canopy down and use the center overhead latch to hold it closed. If you slow down it is possible to pull the canopy down with out a problem. The reason it came open was I did not have the latch adjusted far enough over the canopy hold down rollers on the rear of the canopy. -- Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS First flight July 14, 1989 :-) Hillsboro, OR jsflyrv(at)ix.netcom.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 19, 1997
From: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Mixture question
Richard Bibb wrote: > > > My mixture control doesn't seem to effect anything. Question: What > is a > good initial setting on a Marvel Carb (O-320-E2D) for the idle mixture > screw. How much to adjust it to obtain "idle cutoff", e.g. 1/4 turn > per > adjustment of 1 "click"? > > How do tell if the mixture is working properly? > > Baffled by this one.... > > Richard > I adjusted my mixture to get about a 50 rpm increase before it cuts off. -- Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS First flight July 14, 1989 :-) Hillsboro, OR jsflyrv(at)ix.netcom.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 20, 1997
From: John Darby <johnd@our-town.com>
Subject: Re: Mixture question
>My mixture control doesn't seem to effect anything. Question: What is a >good initial setting on a Marvel Carb (O-320-E2D) for the idle mixture >screw. How much to adjust it to obtain "idle cutoff", e.g. 1/4 turn per >adjustment of 1 "click"? >How do tell if the mixture is working properly? >PS - Anyone got a Marvel Carb manual and/or overhaul guide they will part >with/copy for a reasonable fee? Richard; If I understand, you are looking for the initial mix screw setting and then the adjustment? I set mine to the full in, closed, position then unscrewed it two full turns. I finally got the engine running with no further settings. After it was running I had a friend in the cockpit, I got under there (very carefully I might add) and started adjusting the mix. screw until it was running smoothly. Then at engine shut down, I watched the rpm very closely as I would pull the mix. control out. What I was looking for was about 50-75 rpm increase as the mix. control was shutting the engine down. ie, a rise just before the engine rpm dropped and the engine died. If you are fast, you can get the rise-drop and then the mix. back in and the engine will start back up without stopping. I don't have the Marvel repair manual, but there is some of this stuff in the Lyc. operators handbook if you have one. Mine was an E2D so this is applicable to yours as well. It is what I have read in various sources and what I've been told by the FBO mechanics. As for the mix. control (not the screw) once you have the screw set, all you do is clamp the end of the wire so that the movement of the knob will cause the mix. cut off lever to have full travel to open and shut position. Hope this helps. John Darby RV6 sold Stephenville TX johnd@our-town.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RBusick505(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 20, 1997
Subject: Re: Jackpot Race results
Grant I disagree that the RVs are clean, that is a very relative term. They are clean as compared to a C-182, but when comparing to each other, one can be as much at 20-25 miles an hour faster based upon cleaning up the airplane. Steve Barnard website has some good ideas. From my research you can increase the speed by: New improved two piece wheel pants, 3-4 mph Tracy Sailor gear leg fairings, 2-3 mph improving the engine cooling /exhaust systems, 8-10 mph improved wing tips, 1-2 mph fuel injection/electronis ignition (more HP), 3-4 mph constant speed prop, best climb and cruise performance fairing on ALL protrusions, 1-2 mph eliminate canopy and other drafts (air leaks) 1-2 mph properly designed expanding radius wing root fairings, 3-4 mph change the wing incident angle 1/2 to 1 degree, 2-3 mph There is much controversy about many of the above improvements and the actual mph improvements. But from an aeronautical engineering standpoint, there is more that can be done. In Kent Paser's book "Speed with Economy" he lists all kinds of ways that an RV type A/C can improve the top end speed without adding more HP. Great book. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: AtkRWC(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 20, 1997
Subject: Re: Incident almost accident
<< Well, you have probably guessed it - the canopy suddenly sprung open at about 700ft! >> Good job getting the A/C back down and not loosing your cool or RV!!! What damage (if any) was substained to the Aircraft? Has anyone ever devised a warning system to advise the pilot of a RV if the canopy latches are not secure? Cars have them, the Military A/C I flew had them. I suspect that it would really not be all that difficult. Richard Clayton Brownsville, TX ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 20, 1997
From: Boris <smbr(at)digital.net>
Subject: repairman's certificate/insurance
A plastic airplane builder in our local glider club relayed an interesting story concerning insurance and a repairman's certificate. The builder helped build a Velocity aircraft for a fellow. The fellow obtained an experimental airworthiness certificate but never got his repairman's certificate. He insured the plane for the total of his costs at $115,000. After a year he did an 'annual' and signed the logbook as such. Experimentals get 'condition' inspections not annuals. But, he did not have a repairman's certificate to legally do the inspection. He just recently had an engine failure and totaled the plane, he was unharmed. The insurance company will not pay because he was not authorized to do the condition inspection. He should have used an A&P. Ouch! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "mcomeaux" <mcomeaux(at)cmc.net>
Subject: Dimples & Sinks--
Date: Jul 20, 1997
I am working on the vertical stab and according to the george tape he says to counter sink the VS-603PP and gauge with a 426 rivet to flush. According to manual it says to use a scrap piece of .032 and dimple to gauge the counter sink whats a guy to do? Confused--Mike Comeaux mcomeaux(at)cmc.net RV6A emp. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 20, 1997
From: Denny Harjehausen <retflygtiger(at)proaxis.com>
Subject: Re: Incident almost accident
>Has anyone ever devised a warning system to advise the pilot of a RV if the >canopy latches are not secure? Yes there are several designs I have seen in Kitplane, Sport Aviation and Rvator. I couldn't locate any except the one that was in my 14 years of Rvator which is for a RV-4 (page 115). If I find the others I have seen I will post it. I know I have seen one for the RV-6, but where? There was a fatal accident of a RV-6 that the canopy was reported to have popping up. This could have been part of the pilot's loss of control. The story as I recall it was the second flight. An observer reported he thought the canopy popped up just before the aircraft descent into ground in a left turn. I understand Van has tested the aircraft in this configuration and has found it flys fine. Congraulations on keeping control...We were told every check ride " fly the airplane first, then fight the emergency". It got old hearing that every 6 months, but it sure got it across to me. Have a Great Day! Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH Fuselage-top side Lebanon, OR ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 20, 1997
From: "r.acker" <r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Super Cavalier project...
To all who inquired about the Super Cavalier project. I'm posting here because there were so many inquiries. There person selling it has 20+ years into the project, and is selling due to poor health. Obviously, the man has a strong emotional attachment to the project, and dealing with him will require delicacy. My friend who told me of the project will find out the details (i.e. willing to separate, time engine stored, etc). As soon as I know the information, I will post here. Your patience appreciated. Regards, Rob Acker / r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com / RV-6Q ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ken_Hitchmough(at)magic.ca (Ken Hitchmough)
Date: Jul 20, 1997
Subject: Re: Nose wheel shimmy
After about a dozen landings in my new RV-6A, I'me having a problem which has developed on my last two flights. On landing, as soon as the nose wheel touches down and then until the speed gets below 30ish there is a tremendous vibration and the nose wheel feels like it is about to rip itself off. I was very happy when it slowed down and stopped, and was invisioning my new RV nose down on the runway minus a prop and most of the lower cowl. Hi Andy, I had a similar problem after about 10 landings and tightened the nut up to a few pounds of pull above what is recommended. Interestingly enough, thats what we had to do on the Air Beetle also. Obviously, keeping the weight of the wheel on landing helps too and I progressively pull back on the stick until I'm practicall stopped. Ken RV6A Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JDaniel343(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 20, 1997
Subject: Getting people involved
I totally agree with you Gene. We need to expose as many people as we can to the pleasures of building and flying general and experimental aircraft as we can. I have my children help whenever I can in the construciton of my RV-6. They are 11yrs, 10 yrs, and 6 yrs. old. You can imagine I limit the 6yr. old from doing any thing really tough but handing me clecos, and tools is enough to make her happy. The other two help with bucking rivets and drilling holes. I don't know what I would do without their help. I try and get the neibor kids involved too, as well as their parents. Their always amazed that I am actually building an airplane in my garage. Good luck, and let keep incouraging aviation to everyone we meet. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JDaniel343(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 20, 1997
Subject: Re: Dimples & Sinks--
Use a scrap piece of 0.032 to test the countersink and gauge it with a rivet. When it appears even then countersink on building piece. Good Luck ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RVinfo(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 20, 1997
Subject: Preoilers
I am going through and IO-360 for an RV-8 and intend to have the Nay nozzles installed and intall a preoiler. Does anyone have any experience with either of these devices? I have seen an electric preoiler and Aircraft Spruce lists a hand type pump in their catalog. Bruce Green ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 21, 1997
From: "L. Coats" <lcoats(at)wave.co.nz>
Subject: incorrect distance
One RV list reader has picked up on an error in my last posting - the length of runway was supposed to be metres not feet! No damage to the aircraft when the canopy popped except a deep scratch through the paint on the roll over bar when the edge of the canopy lock mechanism went past. L.Coats RV6 196.2hr ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 20, 1997
From: "les williams" <lesliebwilliams(at)msn.com>
Subject: Dimples & Sinks--
Mike, I think what we're talking about here relates to MACHINE countersinking versus DIMPLE countersinking of the VS-603PP skin. If you dimple the skin, then you machine countersink VS-608PP to accept the dimples in VS-603PP. The dimpled .032 scrap is used to check the depth of the countersink in VS-608PP, thus the caution to work up to the correct depth slowly so you don't over do it. George's tape illustrates machine countersinking the skin, thus using a rivet to check the depth for a flush fit. VS-608PP is just deburred for this method. Hope this helps. Les Williams/RV-6AQ/still working on canopy stuff! ---------- From: owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com on behalf of mcomeaux Sent: Sunday, July 20, 1997 10:45 AM Subject: RV-List: Dimples & Sinks-- I am working on the vertical stab and according to the george tape he says to counter sink the VS-603PP and gauge with a 426 rivet to flush. According to manual it says to use a scrap piece of .032 and dimple to gauge the counter sink whats a guy to do? Confused--Mike Comeaux mcomeaux(at)cmc.net RV6A emp. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 20, 1997
From: "Ray Murphy, Jr." <murphy(at)mail.coos.or.us>
Subject: Internet addresses
Gary, Sorry I didn't get this to you earlier. Nancy and I went to the Eugene Air Fair yesterday. Some nice planes on display there. Unfortunately since it is a fair and not an airshow they could only do flybys. Nancy and I really enjoyed lunch on Friday. We'll have to do this again. http://www.pec.co.nz/~frankv/bunny1.htm http://rv.austin.apple.com/jhovan/home.html http://www.vansaircraft.com/ To check out the rv builders list send a one word email to rv-list-request(at)matronics.com the one word should be subscribe. That should be the only word in the body of the email. Ray and Nancy Murphy murphy(at)mail.coos.or.us RV6A empenage ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 20, 1997
From: "Ray Murphy, Jr." <murphy(at)mail.coos.or.us>
Subject: Eugene Air Fair.
Listers, I attended the Eugene, Oregon Air Fair yesterday. Although I didn't get to see who was flying it the first RV8 was in attendance. Its take off performance was truely impressive. There were several warbirds there and the RV8 easily climbed twice as fast as any of them. (including a Fouga) those of you building an 8 will have a very impresive machine when you are done. The 8 was at atlest 3,000' by mid field and soon climbed out of sight. Ray and Nancy Murphy murphy(at)mail.coos.or.us RV6A empenage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JRWillJR(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 20, 1997
Subject: Re: repairman's certificate/insurance
That is what I said earlier on this list --- that the builder who holds the Repairman cert. is the only person who can do repairs and inspections or an A&P, I.A. I was jumped on to say the least, however , I like the rock upon which I stand. If you did not build it you cannot work on it without hand holding with an A&P etc. I feel bad for the owner and hope it works out somehow for him. The insurance people are probably worse about this stuff than the FAA. What a drag. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 20, 1997
From: Dr John Cocker <jcocker(at)medhumor.com>
Subject: Re: Landing Light
I installed two, mainly as I use the lights to make me more visible in the circuit. I also have them flashing alternately, for the same reason. Buried in the archives is a report on using 12v Halogen lights from Walmart, which are sold for track lighting. They were a lot less expensive, and some of the RVs have two on each side. John (Now up to 36 hours) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 20, 1997
From: Denny Harjehausen <retflygtiger(at)proaxis.com>
Subject: Re: Jackpot Race results
> >In Kent Paser's book "Speed with Economy" he lists all kinds of ways that an >RV type A/C can improve the top end speed without adding more HP. Great >book. Very interesting subject. I purchased Tracy's "leg covers" and the fellow in Florida that makes wing fairings and fast pants. Contacted Steve on his cowl, but my engine takes the short cowl and the cowl is not made for mine. I would like to see Tracy's as his type of cowl would fit mine. I have seen the above book mentioned before. I couldn't find it in the past postings. Does any one know where it is being sold? Have a Great Day! Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH Fuselage-top side Lebanon, OR ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 21, 1997
From: Frank van der Hulst <frankv(at)pec.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Tail light: Was Landing Light and For Sale Repost
> > Regarding the second landing light, I have a new in box Van's unit for > sale > at discount. Also a stainless pitot tube, and looking to swap a > no-light-rudder fairing for lighted version. Are you saying you want the lighted version of the rudder bottom fairing? I'd swap, but since I'm in NZ and I've already cut it to fit my rudder horn, I don't think it's practical. I inadvertently (asked for 'regular' fairing meaning no light, received 'regular' fairing incl light) got the lighted fairing. I'd decided that since I have it, I might as well live with it, and perhaps fit a combined white light/strobe to it. However, I've been advised that the best thing to do would be to cut off the light molding to change it into a lightless one, and put strobes/lights on the wingtips. Apparently the rudder is subject to a fair amount of vibration which destroys lamp filaments and/or loosens the fittings themselves. I guess this applies especially when taking off/landing on grass strips; probably it doesn't apply to a -6A. Plus there's the hassle of running wires to a moving control surface. Anyone with one flying: is this really a big problem? Frank. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 20, 1997
From: lottmc(at)datastar.net (Michael C. Lott)
Subject: Re: repairman's certificate/insurance
I was told by a man at the FAA you could work on it without an A+P or a repairmans certificate, you just couldn't sign off the yearly inspection. Is this correct? The FAA said it is, but I keep hearing different stories. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 20, 1997
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)navix.net>
Subject: Re: Tail light: Was Landing Light and For Sale
Repost >However, I've been advised that the best thing to do would be to cut off >the light molding to change it into a lightless one, and put >strobes/lights on the wingtips. Apparently the rudder is subject to a >fair amount of vibration which destroys lamp filaments and/or loosens >the fittings themselves. I guess this applies especially when taking >off/landing on grass strips; probably it doesn't apply to a -6A. Plus >there's the hassle of running wires to a moving control surface. >Frank. Frank, I've not had any trouble with the tail light in the rudder on my six in 365 hours. However, on my next six, I intend to use the 3 light, wing tip strobes. This would save the hassle of rebuilding the "bubble" so that the tail light will fit (out of the box, my light didn't fit worth a hoot) and solve the problem of wire routing and the flexing of the wire. It would also eleminate the small amount of weight (on a really long arm). Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)navix.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ron Caldwell" <rlcaldwell@utah-inter.net>
Subject: C/S Prop Installations
Date: Jul 20, 1997
I'm planning to purchase and install a C/S prop and governor from Vans. They will be installed on my 0-320-D3G engine. Does anyone know where is the best place to purchase an Accessory Case which has the prop governor mounting pad? My case is a molded one piece case and the place where the prop governor goes is not removable. Also, do I need to purchase a prop drive for the governor that I will get from Vans? Is there a good place to call for Prop Governor help? Thanks for any suggestions. Ron Caldwell - RV6A Installing Sliding Canopy rlcaldwell@utah-inter.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 20, 1997
From: Gil Alexander <gila(at)flash.net>
Subject: Re: Jackpot Race results
> >Very interesting subject. I purchased Tracy's "leg covers" and the fellow >in Florida that makes wing fairings and fast pants. Contacted Steve on his >cowl, but my engine takes the short cowl and the cowl is not made for mine. >I would like to see Tracy's as his type of cowl would fit mine. Denny, Tracy's mod. of the short cowl is a really tight fit. I spoke to him at the Chino fly-in, and he pointed out that if his c/s prop goes to the fully coarse pitch setting, it will rub on the front of the outer edges of the modified (circular) air inlets. The long cowl (old fixed pitch cowl) is about 3 inches longer, and this gives more room under the cowl for the transition from the circular air inlets to the fully enclosed plenum cooling air box. A side benefit is that with the cowling no longer pressurized, it has no tendency to 'bulge' at speed on the top surface at the firewall. Personally, I'm probably going to use Steve Barnard's new cowling on my O-320 with a Sensenich metal prop with a 4 inch spacer (presently on loan to a RV4 driver to see if it's better than his Warnke prop). This combination is the one that fits Vans old 'fixed pitch' longer cowls. The gain from improved cooling is one of the larger _single_ speed improvement modifications. .... Gil (still on hold) Alexander RV6A, #20701, finishing kit. > > >Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH ------------------------------------------------------- mailto:gila(at)flash.net Gil Alexander, Los Angeles, CA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6junkie(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 20, 1997
Subject: Re: Mixture question
The mixture adjustment that has been mentioned ("the screw") is for the idle circuit and does nothing for the mixture while in flight. The only adjustment in flight is the mixture arm which you control with the mixture control cable. If you can get no adjustment from your mixture you probably have one of the "lean" carbs. The only fix is to drill out the jet. Gary Corde RV-6 N211GC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 20, 1997
From: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: repairman's certificate/insurance
Michael C. Lott wrote: > > > I was told by a man at the FAA you could work on it without an A+P or > a > repairmans certificate, you just couldn't sign off the yearly > inspection. Is this correct? The FAA said it is, but I keep hearing > different stories. > You are correct, you only need the repairman certificate to do the condition inspections. Any other work or repairs you can do yourself. -- Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS First flight July 14, 1989 :-) Hillsboro, OR jsflyrv(at)ix.netcom.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 21, 1997
From: Sharlene Shipley or Bruce Knoll <snsbfk(at)mail.sage.net>
Subject: Re: Jackpot Race results
Hi Denny, How aabout a source and price for the book by Kent Paser? Thanks, Bruce Start RV6 after Osh > >> >>In Kent Paser's book "Speed with Economy" he lists all kinds of ways that an >>RV type A/C can improve the top end speed without adding more HP. Great >>book. > > >Very interesting subject. I purchased Tracy's "leg covers" and the fellow >in Florida that makes wing fairings and fast pants. Contacted Steve on his >cowl, but my engine takes the short cowl and the cowl is not made for mine. >I would like to see Tracy's as his type of cowl would fit mine. > >I have seen the above book mentioned before. I couldn't find it in the past >postings. Does any one know where it is being sold? > >Have a Great Day! > >Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH > Fuselage-top side > Lebanon, OR > > > > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > +-- --+ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: OrndorffG(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 21, 1997
Subject: Re: Nose wheel shimmy
Andy, On both of my RV-6A I had the same trouble with the nose wheel. I think its just breakin wear on the shimy washers. I do from time to time check the presure on the shimy washers but it seems to settle out after a month or so fo good flying. At least by the time you have your test time flown off. Keep um flying...George Orndorff ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 21, 1997
From: Denny Harjehausen <retflygtiger(at)proaxis.com>
Subject: Re: Jackpot Race results
>Hi Denny, >How aabout a source and price for the book by Kent Paser? >Thanks, >Bruce >Start RV6 after Osh Bruce, I'm looking for the same thing. I searched some magazines last night. I did find "Paser Publications" (303)979-3666 in the Yellar Pages. But that is the best I have for now. Have a Great Day! Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH Fuselage-top side Lebanon, OR ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 21, 1997
From: gcomfo(at)tc3net.com (Gordon Comfort)
Subject: Intercom/Videocamera connection
This is an apology to readers who may have noted my posting last week on the above subject. I misstated the location for the impedance matching resistor. The extra jack and the plug containing the resistor are for the headphones, not the microphone. The resultant cable connects the aircraft audio output to the remote mic input on the camera. I hope no one has been inconvenienced and I will try to be more careful in the future. Gordon Comfort N363GC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 21, 1997
Subject: Re: Incident almost accident
<33D1AB80.13FFD8FB(at)ix.netcom.com> 58,60,62,64-65,67,69-101
From: wstucklen1(at)juno.com (Frederic w Stucklen)
Listers, When the tilt-up canopy latch isn't properly closed for take-off or in flight it opens, the canopy opens only about a foot. There is an increase in drag, but unless your already in a tight climb situation, it shouldn't be anything to worry about. The noise level certainly increases! The canopy opens about a foot due to the lift it's shape generates. A while back I posted results of some experimentation I performed while test flying N925RV. The object was to learn the flying charactoristics of the airplane with the canopy unlatched and open. The results indicated the lift component of the canopy as well as some interesting trim abnomalies. In fact, the canopy can be used in place of the elevator if the elevator fuction was ever lost! I found that, after trimming to level flight with the canopy open, forcing the canopy farther open resulted in the nose pitching down. Pulling it shut caused the nose to pitch upwards. These tests were performed at an indicated airspeed of 100 mph as I was worried that other damage may be induced, particularly to the front edge and/or hinge area of the canopy. I am sure that in the event of a lost elevator funtion, I could successfully land the airplane by using a combination of trim, power setting, and canopy. Fred Stucklen RV-6A N925RV (Working on 2'd -6A [Chevy Powered!]) wstucklen1(at)juno.com writes: > >L. Coats wrote: >> > > >> Well, you have probably guessed it - the canopy suddenly sprung open at >> about 700ft! Sort-of grabs your attention as it is suddenly very cold, >> very windy and you can't hear any engine running and lose maps start flying >> around the cockpit. Van's words in an RVator suddenly sprung to mind >> - >> 'fly the plane' so I did't do anything about the canopy which was lifted >> about a foot high. (I didn't have a passenger today so there was no one to >> hold the canopy either). Now, when this happens you will find that as the >> airspeed slows the canopy lifts even further. I did a circuit at 700ft and >> landed on 23 and had to land viewing out the side as the canopy was >> obstructing the view ahead. Unfortunately our runways are short in length >> - 11 is 590 ft and 23 being a bit longer at 618 ft - so as there was >> neglible wind I thought it would be wiser to land on a longer runway and >> slightly faster than normal 65kts (haven't tested the stall speed with the >> canopy unlatched!). For those of you that have nice long runways I suspect >> that if you land at a higher airspeed you will have better visibility over >> the nose. >> I post this in the hope that if anyone else experiences this phenomenon they >> remember Van's words to 'fly the plane' and to also illustrate how a brief >> distraction during the checks can be disasterous. >> >> L. Coats RV6 ZK-RVL 196.2hr >> >When I first atarted flying my RV-6 I had the canopy come unlatched in >flight and you are right it does get your attention. It opened about >as you describe but I was able to slow down and pull the canopy down >and use the center overhead latch to hold it closed. If you slow down >it is possible to pull the canopy down with out a problem. The reason it >came open was I did not have the latch adjusted far enough over the >canopy hold down rollers on the rear of the canopy. >-- >Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS First flight July 14, 1989 :-) Hillsboro, >OR >jsflyrv(at)ix.netcom.com > > > > > +-- > --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at >http://www.matronics.com | > | --- > | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email >"rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or >subject. | > +-- > --+ > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 21, 1997
Subject: Re: Landing Light
<33CF4C13.52A8(at)mail.ic.net>
From: wstucklen1(at)juno.com (Frederic w Stucklen)
Listers, I have the Bob Olds kits in both wings. This kind of lighting is superior to any other aircraft I've flown. They a light a dark runway up very well, even in the rain. The only complaint I've had is that I get mistaken for a 747 on final ! For those not familiar with this aftermarket option, it has a 130W/90W hi/lo beam in each lamp, which makes it great for taxi and landings. In 915 Hrs of flying, I still have not replaces a bulb..... The bulbs are available from J.C.Whitney.... Fred Stucklen RV-6A N925RV Working on a 2'd -6A wstucklen1(at)juno.com writes: > >Jim Cimino wrote: >> >> I just installed the landing light in the right wing leading >edge(the kit >> from Van's). Does anyone feel the need for a second landing light >in the >> left wing? Most GA aircraft about this size do fine with one. I'm >open >> for suggestions. > >One is all you need for landing, but some folks have installed a >second >light in the other wing for taxiing. This is my plan. > >PatK - RV-6A > > > > +-- > --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at >http://www.matronics.com | > | --- > | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email >"rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or >subject. | > +-- > --+ > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 21, 1997
From: Richard Bibb <rbibb(at)fore.com>
Subject: Re: Mixture question
Thanks for the replies re: mixture control. The problem with no response to the mixture lever was cured by taking the carb body apart. The float needle appeared to be stuck (not convinced it had been all along) and upon reassembly the mixture control worked properly. I think the mixture control was sticking somehow and not actually rotating properly inside even though the external lever was moving properly. In any event the idle cutoff now works. I still have to fine tune the adjustment to get the 50 RPM rise at shutoff and will work on that tonight. Oil temp indicator and/or sensor failed so I need to troubleshoot/replace. A few remaining placards, weight and balance, swing compass and I'm ready for the inspector on Friday. I taxies great. Richard Bibb RV-4 N144KT ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6Russ(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 21, 1997
Subject: Re: Osh Kosh Sales Lot
I know what you mean - I have had to ask both kids and adults to "stop doing that". I'm not going back to oshkosh this year and may not ever again. Its a fun show but I is incredibly expensive for EAA members who I think should be given a break when we bring in our "showplanes". I thought that was what the EAA is supposed to be about - homebuilding. The catering now seems to be to everyone but the homebuilders. I agree the security proceedures need to be changed on the Organizational level. The individual cannot hope to cope with the spectator ding problem. I find similar problems at Arlington and Copperstate although they don't seem to be nearly as bad. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 21, 1997
From: Don Wentz <Don_Wentz(at)ccm2.hf.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Landing Light Installation]
Jim, A fellow lister was kind enough to fwd your note. A couple of things: most of your landing light usage will be for "see and be seen" use in the pattern or on hazy days. Since we have very small, very fast aircraft, anything we can 'turn-on' to make us more visible is a good thing. I do fly home from our chapter hangar after dark quite often, and certainly appreciate having the lights available for takeoff, landing, and taxi on those occasions. As to mounting the reflector, install the nutplates, install the reflector, install a screw with one of the large washers. The large washer will overlap the reflector and hold it in. I know that is in the plans 'someplace', but as happened often to me during my RV-6 project, that text must have gotten 'invisible' just when you needed it :-). Some folks have commented that the washers don't look 'good' to them. I don't disagree that some kind of face plate over the reflector would look better, but that part would be costly to tool and kit, and adding 5-10$ to the kits for that isn't worth it to me. Besides, if Lyle Hefel can win awards at Oshkosh on 2 different RVs with 2 Duckworks STOCK lights installed in each, I suppose it must be OK. Thanks again for purchasing our lights, and let me know if you have any further questions. Don 'The Duck' Wentz, N790DW, 180HP RV-6, #20369 Well, it seems that most people feel two lights are almost a must. I had a Cessna 172 a few years back and spent more time landing with an inoperable light than a working one. Landing at most airports without a light is not a problem, I have never found them to illuminate much before touch-down anyway. But taxiing and being seen are other considerations. I will be putting a second light in. I did run into one snag though during the installation. I cannot understand how I'm supposed to mount the reflector to the main bracket. The hole is cut and drilled for nutplates, but the reflector does not reach that area. Am I supposed to make some kind of bracket and rivit to the reflector and then nutplate it to the bracket? I wonder if this is a new style light they're using and didn't notice that there were no provisions for mounting. There is no mention in the instructions. I called Duckworks, he called back the next day, but I was not home. I guess I'll try again next week. Jim Cimino RV-8 sn 80039 http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/5771 (717)842-4057 --------------2AD528635249-- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Austin Tinckler" <tinckler(at)axionet.com>
Subject: Re: repairman's certificate/insurance
Date: Jul 21, 1997
> To: rv-list > Subject: RV-List: repairman's certificate/insurance > Date: Sunday, July 20, 1997 10:51 AM > The insurance company will not pay because he was not authorized to do > the condition inspection. He should have used an A&P. Ouch! How Sh*t Happens: In the beginning there was the Plan. And then came the Assumptions. And the Assumptions were without Form. And the Plan was without Substance. And Darkness was upon the face of the Workers. And they spoke among themselves saying "It is a crock of sh*t and it stinketh" And the Workers went unto their Supervisors and said, "It is a pail of dung and none may abide the odor thereof". And the Supervisors went unto their Managers, saying, "It is a vessel of fertilizer and none may abide its' strength". And the Directors spoke among themselves, saying to one another, "It containeth that which aids plant growth and it is very strong". And the Directors went unto the Vice Presidents, saying, "This new Plan will actively promote the growth and vigor of the company with its' powerful effects". And the President looked upon the Plan and saw that it was good. And the Plan became policy. And that is how Sh*t Happeneth . ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Shelby1138(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 21, 1997
Subject: Re: Jackpot Race results
In a message dated 7/20/97 3:52:34 PM, you wrote: <> How do you change the wing incedent angle? Shelby in Nashville. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tim Lewis" <timrv6a(at)earthlink.net>
Date: Jul 21, 1997
Subject: Re: repairman's certificate/insurance
> > That is what I said earlier on this list --- that the builder who holds the > Repairman cert. is the only person who can do repairs and inspections or an > A&P, I.A. I was jumped on to say the least, however , I like the rock upon > which I stand. If you did not build it you cannot work on it without hand > holding with an A&P etc. I don't believe that is correct. FAR 43.3 contains the language requiring an A&P to do repair work on an aircraft. FAR 43.1, however, says that "This part does not apply to any aircraft for which an experimental airworthiness certificate has been issued...". The requirement for a condition inspection is laid out in the operating limitations of the aircraft (see AC 20-27D, Appendix 9, items 8, 9, and 10 for a sample). As far as I know, nowhere in the FAR or the sample operating limitations is there are requirement for a person doing REPAIRS to be an A&P or repairman certificate holder. I'd be interested in knowing the FAR, AC, or other reference that leads to a different conclusion. ------------------------------------ Tim Lewis N47TD (reserved) RV-6AQ #60023 San Antonio TX timrv6a(at)earthlink.net or timrv6a(at)iname.com ------------------------------------ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 21, 1997
From: Dennis Jackson <denny(at)transport.com>
Subject: Re: Ken Hatfield
Edward Cole wrote: > > > I have seen ads in trade-a-plane for products from ken hatfield industries > > for roller rockers and camshafts. I havn't seen these adds for quite some > > time though. Does anyone know anything about these products. I am currently > > majoring an 10360 and am exploring all options. > > > > Bruce Green > > Bruce, > I saw the rocker arms advertised in a Chief Aircraft Catalog. You might > want to check with them. > Ed Cole > Ken Hatfield died a year or so ago, so I looked in the yellow pages for his business listing but it wasn't there and I didn't see anything that looked like something that would be manufacturing his products. I tried calling the old number I had for his business but it keeps coming up busy. I guess Chief might be the place to go. I went to Ken's shop a few years ago and he showed me his roller setup. Looked good but I don't know anyone running them. DJ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RBusick505(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 21, 1997
Subject: Re: RV-List Speed With Economy
>In Kent Paser's book "Speed with Economy" he lists all kinds of ways that an >RV type A/C can improve the top end speed without adding more HP. Great >book. >> You can order direct from: Paser Publications 5672 West Chestnut Ave Littleton, Colorado 80123 Price 24.95 plus 3.5 shipping Phone 303 979-3666 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mikel(at)dimensional.com
Date: Jul 21, 1997
Subject: Re: airman knowledge
>Well, I am one of those pilots that does a thorough preflight check prior to >every flight and do the standard run up and the DVA's........... Ooooh! Another one: DVA's. Ok.........ok.......I KNOW this stuff......ok: "D".......no idea. How about the "V".........hmmmmmmmm.......nothing. Ok: the "A" I should be able to figure this out. Run up........and DVA's. D.......V.......A's. Dig Van's Airplanes!! No. Not even close, stupid try. Again.....:Departing Versus Arriving......that can't be it: if you're on the ground, you're departing; in the air, arriving.....don't need a check list for that. I give up..... :>) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 21, 1997
Subject: changing incedence angle
<< <> How do you change the wing incedent angle? Shelby in Nashville. >> I think you'd need to re-locate the rear spar carry-thru a bit to keep good edge distance. Are you supposed to reduce to 0 or 1/2 deg, from 1/2 (-4) or 1 (-6) deg? Seems that having the engine pull in the exact direction of travel could net a small increase, but could it (the increase) be measured? This would seemingly raise the flap trailing edge above the bottom skin quite a bit, and this would cause some extra drag in that area. HOWEVER! if the angle is increased, the flap fit would be better, and less drag would occur. Hmmmmmmm......... Check six! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6Russ(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 21, 1997
Subject: Re: Nose wheel shimmy
I have had a continuing problem with the nose wheel shimmy. I asked Van about it and he said you have to adjust the breakout force to specs and "keep an eye on it". I have adjusted it 3 times in 150 hours and it seems to be getting finikyer all the time. Even after the most recent adjustment it would still have a mild shimmy. I don't know how much one can tighten it up without causing some other problem. My nosewheel fairing and gear leg fairing suffered damage during one such earlier incident. I too would like to hear any solution to this problem. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 21, 1997
From: Dennis Jackson <denny(at)transport.com>
Subject: Re: airman knowledge
dimensional.com!mikel(at)matronics.com wrote: > > > >Well, I am one of those pilots that does a thorough preflight check prior to > >every flight and do the standard run up and the DVA's........... > > Ooooh! Another one: DVA's. Ok.........ok.......I KNOW this stuff...... How about "Dangerous Velocity Anomalies"? or maybe "Dreaded Verification Apoplexy"? or possibly "Determination, Validation, Accuracy"? more likely would be "Direct Verbal Aggravation" of the tower :>) DJ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 21, 1997
From: Jim Lewman <lewman(at)wt.net>
Subject: Re: "Speed with Economy"
Denny, Paser Publications 5672 W. Chestnut Ave. Littleton, CO 80123 303-904-3417 The price is listed as $ 24.95 plus $ 3.50 shipping and handling (USA). Jim Lewman Houston, TX ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 21, 1997
From: steve(at)barnardaircraft.com (barnardaircraft)
Subject: airframe options
Hi Robert, If you could make the request after Oshkosh again I would appreciate it. Time is very short in light of this preparation. The comments of R Busick is a good general start. It's all in the details. > > >>>>>>>>>>I still have the same >gph fuel flow I had before yet cruise 30 mph faster. > > If anyone who is going to Oshkosh >Steve, >some of us are unfortunately too far away this time of the year to go. Could >you post perhaps a description of what you did and the sources of the parts here >on the list? >Thanks >Robert (in Congo, Africa) >Flying STOL701, starting RV-6A quick build after summer Respectfully, Steve Barnard Barnard Aircraft Components RV-6A N157ST 1000 hrs flying steve(at)barnardaircraft.com http://www.barnardaircraft.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 21, 1997
From: steve(at)barnardaircraft.com (barnardaircraft)
Subject: Re: RV-6 magazine reviews? (also magazine indexes)
I hope everyone enjoyed the post on the Jackpot Race results. I listed them here to let people know how the RV's stack up against themselves and other airplanes. I have the other classes and different airplane speeds if anyone wants more information. The plastic pushers are still very efficient as airplanes go, but the speed gap between them and RV's have closed with Dave Anders being the exception in RV world. When Dave throttles up he just disappears. The fastest Long-EZ was just 4 mph faster than the RV-6A. I love it, because I have a fat airplane when compared to these airplanes with a fat stubby wing and 3 gear hanging in the breeze. The RV shines in takeoff and climb in comparison. There is simply no contest there. Klaus Sauvier being the exception, he'll eat you for lunch in a climb. Enjoy >Yes, Steve, tell us how fast the RVs go. I have a friend who is a backwards >plastic airplane driver in such shows as Jackpot who commented that there >were enough RVs this year to have their own heat. In fact, he said that there >were so many contestants that the last heats of the day were flown in such >rough air that it made shoulder harness almost mandatory to even stay inside >the airplanes. > > > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > +-- --+ > Respectfully, Steve Barnard Barnard Aircraft Components RV-6A N157ST 1000 hrs flying steve(at)barnardaircraft.com http://www.barnardaircraft.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 21, 1997
From: steve(at)barnardaircraft.com (barnardaircraft)
Subject: Re: Attn: Barnard Aircraft Components, Inc.
Some of the speed mods I have developed will work on the RV-8 if you are using the IO-360 200 hp engine because our changes revolve around this engine. The laminar flow inlets for cooling and induction air are a perfect match. We are focusing on attention to detail on the RV-6 at this time and cannot commit to specific RV-8 additions yet. Keep asking the closer you get to completion. I will be at Oshkosh for a while so bare with me. > >Dear Barnard Aircraft Components: > >Sorry to bother the whole list, but your e-mail address came back marked >"undeliverable." Besides, your answer might be of interest to other >RV-listers. > >What plans, if any, do you have to develop speed mods for the RV-8? >And, if you do, when do you expect them to become available? > >Thanks. > >--Don McNamara Respectfully, Steve Barnard Barnard Aircraft Components RV-6A N157ST 1000 hrs flying steve(at)barnardaircraft.com http://www.barnardaircraft.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 21, 1997
From: steve(at)barnardaircraft.com (barnardaircraft)
Subject: Re: Jackpot Race results
Grant, Very astute observation on the large speed differences. Most of the serious racers prepare the airplane carefully and some show up and just run with a lot of cleanup necessary. Yes some engines do produce more power than others for a lot of reasons. Flow matching the cylinders, high compression pistons, electronic igntion, better intake systems. All these varied on every airplane there. The big question here is what was the fuel flow. This gives a good indication of Horsepower being developed. Whether that power gets translated into thrust for propulsion is a different story. Attention to detail in all things biting the wind can have a profound effect on the airplane. Grant I can discuss specific areas later upon my return from Oshkosh. Post another note as a reminder. Thanks, this is a great question with a lot of different responses. > >Steve, > >Many thanks for the Jackpot race results. I would be very interested in >your opinions (and others) as to the reasons for the LARGE speed >differences between RVs with 'similar' engines. Are we talking some >serious "real HP" differences due to engine mods/prop issues, or are we >talking about aerodynamic differences being responsible for the majority >of variance in these numbers. I have to believe that power is playing a >large role here since I am assuming all RVs entered were fairly clean. > >grant- Respectfully, Steve Barnard Barnard Aircraft Components RV-6A N157ST 1000 hrs flying steve(at)barnardaircraft.com http://www.barnardaircraft.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 21, 1997
From: steve(at)barnardaircraft.com (barnardaircraft)
Subject: Re: airframe options
It's wonderful to have speed and efficiency Bernie. It's all in the details too numerous to post here at this time. Quality and focus on all things that air flow around. See you at Oshkosh. > > ><< I couldn't help but notice one comment above about Van doing such a good > job with the design there really is'nt much if any room for improvement. > Scott, does 30 mph gains in cruise indicate the design has little room for > improvement. I have obtained that much difference in cruise than I had > before with a RV-6A 180 hp engine and wood prop >> > >Steve, > >I worked for a major jet engine manufacturer for 33 years as an aero engineer >and when any one quoted numbers that were REAL good, they were usually >referred to as "fan-tastic". 30 mph increase over a well done 180 hp RV-6A is >something I would give my eyeteeth for. I will be at O-K and look forward to >hearing and seeing what you did. > >Bernie Kerr >RV-6A all wing spars riveted, mounting spars and ribs to jig. Did not buy >stock wheel pants or tips. Maybe made a mistake buying cowling. Hope to fly >next year > > > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > +-- --+ > Respectfully, Steve Barnard Barnard Aircraft Components RV-6A N157ST 1000 hrs flying steve(at)barnardaircraft.com http://www.barnardaircraft.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 21, 1997
From: steve(at)barnardaircraft.com (barnardaircraft)
Subject: Re: Nose wheel shimmy
This problem will plaque almost anyone with a nosegear sometime during your flying career. I had very few problems with the nose wheel shimmy issue until about 500 hours. We had been using a thick grease to lube the nose wheel fork. One day we ran out of that particular grease and picked up some automotive type. We did condition inspections on 2 RV-6A's the same day using the new grease with the specified torque. We both went flying the next day and both had problems with shimmy. What appears to be happening is a catch 22. If you torque the fork to specs and then using the grease zerk filling the fork full the grease will be forced down the fork and up the fork squishing out at both ends. The bellville washers will then become lubricated and voila you loose torque causing shimmy. We immediately thought the washers were at fault and replaced 4 of them. No change. We them cleaned out all the grease, used a marine grade grease which is thicker in viscosity and did not pump the fork full of grease. The problem went away instantly. I don't think those large bronze shoulder bushings wear very much because of a small amount of rotation that takes place during taxing. Nor does the cupped washers seem to have any wear. It's when the grease gets on the washers and lubricates them. Check the grease your using and use very little. Check the torque several times when it's new and maybe once every 6 months. Good luck >After about a dozen landings in my new RV-6A, I'me having a problem which has developed on my last two flights. On landing, as soon as the nose wheel touches down and then until the speed gets below 30ish there is a tremendous vibration and the nose wheel feels like it is about to rip itself off. I was very happy when it slowed down and stopped, and was invisioning my new RV nose down on the runway minus a prop and most of the lower cowl. > >I imagine this is nose wheel shimmy and the tightening nut needs to be brought back to specs with the correct breakout pressure re-set. > >My question is whether it is common that this adjustment needs to be routinely checked and tightened; or does it typically just need to be re-adjusted just once after a few hours after everything gets a chance to "settle into place". >Andy Gold >RV-6A N-5060 Respectfully, Steve Barnard Barnard Aircraft Components RV-6A N157ST 1000 hrs flying steve(at)barnardaircraft.com http://www.barnardaircraft.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Persyk" <dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Nose wheel shimmy
Date: Jul 21, 1997
There was an article in the RVAtor or a posting on the RV List about two years ago on this. The writer recommended longitudinally balancing the wheel fairings. He put some lead in the nose. It seems possible that a balance point aft of the center of rotation could induce some instability during an oscillation -- the aft CG might create a divergent oscillation, which is what you describe. I believe my Skyhawk wheel pants are balanced for this reason. Dennis 6A fuselage in jig ---------- > From: aol.com!RV6Russ(at)matronics.com > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: Nose wheel shimmy > Date: Monday, July 21, 1997 3:59 PM > > > I have had a continuing problem with the nose wheel shimmy. ... My nosewheel fairing and gear leg > fairing suffered damage during one such earlier incident. I too would like > to hear any solution to this problem. > > > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > +-- --+ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: David Wheaton <dwheaton(at)csi.com>
Subject: New Builder and Questions
Date: Jul 21, 1997
My first post to the list. Received my -6 tail kit the first part of June and have really been collecting tools and learning as I go so far. I have the rear HS spar ready to prime and I am also working on the front HS spar too. I have done a little searching in the rv-list and it has been very helpful so far. What do I have to do to the Alcad before I prime it? Does it need to be roughed up a bit? I will be using a zinc chromate primer I purchased from Aircraft Spruce. How do you reserve an "N" number? David Wheaton RV-6 Rosamond CA Building the HS spars ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 21, 1997
From: mauser(at)claris.com (Richard Chandler)
Subject: Re: Wally Olsen Gone
Frankly, I've had a lot of difficulty thinking of what to say. I wouldn't be a pilot if it weren't for Wally's patch of grass and squadron of well-used planes. The marvel of seeing him tool around in the Jenny once a year is something I never could see enough of, and now I never will. The world is a lot poorer without him. -- Richard Chandler RV-6: Garage bought and being finished, saving for tools and tail kit. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: Kam Yuk CHENG <kamy(at)cyllene.uwa.edu.au>
Subject: primer on the fuel tank ribs
Dear all, While priming the ribs, we also primed the ribs for the fuel tank. Can anyone tell us : (a) must we ensure the removal of the primer ? What is the reason ? (b) any particular method of primer removal so as not to leave any detrimental effect ? Best regards Kamy Cheng University of Western Australia - student project on RV6A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Austin Tinckler" <tinckler(at)axionet.com>
Subject: Re: airman knowledge
Date: Jul 21, 1997
---------- > From: dimensional.com!mikel(at)matronics.com > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: airman knowledge > Date: Monday, July 21, 1997 1:28 PM > > > >Well, I am one of those pilots that does a thorough preflight check prior to > >every flight and do the standard run up and the DVA's........... .......V.......A's. Dig Van's Airplanes!! No. Not even close, stupid > try. Again.....:Departing Versus Arriving......that can't be it: if you're > on the ground, you're departing; in the air, arriving.....don't need a check > list for that. > > I give up..... Dat means......Don't Vait Around......(und GO) ! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: Frank van der Hulst <frankv(at)pec.co.nz>
Subject: Re: New Builder and Questions
Hi David, csi.com!dwheaton(at)matronics.com wrote: > My first post to the list. Received my -6 tail kit the first part of > June > and have really been collecting tools and learning as I go so far. I > have > the rear HS spar ready to prime and I am also working on the front HS > spar > too. I have done a little searching in the rv-list and it has been > very > helpful so far. > > What do I have to do to the Alcad before I prime it? Does it need to > be > roughed up a bit? I will be using a zinc chromate primer I purchased > from > Aircraft Spruce. Oh no, not the dreaded primer question! Every person has their own ideas on this. Living in CA (IIRC from the song, it never rains there) you might even choose to emulate Cessna and not prime at all. That would make things a lot easier for you. My approach is outlined on my Bunny's Guide page http://www.pec.co.nz/~frankv/bunny.htm -- basically, rough it up a little (you don't want to take off the Al layer) with Scotchbrite. You may want to alodine it too. > How do you reserve an "N" number? No idea. But I think it's described somewhere on Hovan's home page which is linked off the Bunny's Guide page. Frank. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: Frank van der Hulst <frankv(at)pec.co.nz>
Subject: Re: RV-List Speed With Economy
RBusick505(at)aol.com > >In Kent Paser's book "Speed with Economy" he lists all kinds of ways > that > an > >RV type A/C can improve the top end speed without adding more HP. > Great > >book. > > You can order direct from: > Paser Publications > 5672 West Chestnut Ave > Littleton, Colorado 80123 > > Price 24.95 plus 3.5 shipping > > Phone 303 979-3666 For those of us not in the USA, does anyone know whether they take Visa? Also, whether they have a fax number? Thanks in advance, Frank. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
Subject: Builders in the Oakland area
From: drigby(at)juno.com (David L. Rigby)
I maybe spending a little bit of time in the Oakland, CA area in the next few months. Are there are any listers in the area who would be willing to show off their projects and finished rv's. Please reply privately to drigby(at)juno.com Thanks Dave Rigby RV-4 Tail Kit ________________________________________________________________________________
From: bstobbe(at)juno.com
Subject: Re: New Builder and Questions
Date: Jul 22, 1997
writes: >What do I have to do to the Alcad before I prime it? Does it need to >be roughed up a bit? You bet. I use scotchbrite pads which get the job done rather quickly. If you don't rough up the surface you will find that your primer does not develop a very good bond... >How do you reserve an "N" number? I did this 2 yrs ago but don't remember the exact procedure. However, it was detailed in the list so you might want to try searching the archive... Bruce Stobbe RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: bstobbe(at)juno.com
Subject: Re: primer on the fuel tank ribs
Date: Jul 22, 1997
writes: >While priming the ribs, we also primed the ribs for the fuel tank. Can >anyone tell us : >(a) must we ensure the removal of the primer ? What is the reason ? > >(b) any particular method of primer removal so as not to leave any >detrimental effect ? You do not want fuel to slowly dissolve your primer and be contaminated. If you can't get it off using a solvent or some other relatively easy method, why not just buy a new set from Van's? Bruce Stobbe RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: bstobbe(at)juno.com
Subject: Re: changing incedence angle
Date: Jul 22, 1997
writes: ><< <> > > How do you change the wing incedent angle? >I think you'd need to re-locate the rear spar carry-thru a bit to keep >good >edge distance. Wait a minute. Incendence angle with respect to what - the fuselage or the horizontal stab? I always thought that when not otherwise specified the incedence angle of the wing was assumed (oh, oh, there's that word) to mean relative to the HS. If that's the case, wouldn't it be easier to move the leading edge of the HS rather than the wing? Bruce Stobbe RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stephen J. Soule" <SSoule(at)pfclaw.com>
Subject: Nose wheel shimmy
Date: Jul 22, 1997
charset="iso-8859-1" Dang it! I knew that as soon as I finally made up my mind and ordered the RV-6A I would find out there was a downside to the nose wheel! Steve Soule Huntington, Vermont (RV-6A fuselage kit on order) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: OrndorffG(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 22, 1997
Subject: Re: Nose wheel shimmy
Russ, I only know of two reasons for the nose wheel shimmy. One is that the shimmy dampiner is loose or install wrong, you need to use a scale of some type like a fishing scale to messure the break point. The second reason is allowing the nose wheel to touch down at two fast of a speed.If you would like please call me and I would be glad to talk to you about this....George Orndorff 817-439-3280 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: "Scott M. Kuebler" <keebs(at)buffnet.net>
Subject: Cutting HS Tip Ribs
Hi everybody, One more question before I start skinning the HS. I have the Orndorff, Pre-punched RV-6, -6a, 8, empannage video. In that video they are building the -8, but they say there is no difference between the -6's and the -8 besides the rudder, which brings me to my question: In the video, when placing the center tip rib, it doesn't look like they cut the rib to fit the HS-610 & HS-614 angles. Instead they just place it on the angles and drill through it. Is this a differnece between the -6 & -8, or is it just a different way to attach the rib. Thanks in advance for the help. Scott Kuebler RV-6, (not cutting anything untill I figure this out) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: Denny Harjehausen <retflygtiger(at)proaxis.com>
Subject: Re: changing incedence angle
>Wait a minute. Incendence angle with respect to what - the fuselage or >the horizontal stab? I always thought that when not otherwise specified >the incedence angle of the wing was assumed (oh, oh, there's that word) >to mean relative to the HS. If that's the case, wouldn't it be easier to >move the leading edge of the HS rather than the wing? > >Bruce Stobbe >RV-6 It is all related, wing, tail and fuselage. Tail will corrects for the wing, but you can end up "dragging" the fuselage with built in errors on wing angle being corrected by the HS. Have a Great Day! Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH Fuselage-top side Lebanon, OR ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: Scott Gesele <scottg(at)icsnet.com>
Subject: Re: primer on the fuel tank ribs
>While priming the ribs, we also primed the ribs for the fuel tank. Can >anyone tell us : >(a) must we ensure the removal of the primer ? What is the reason ? > >(b) any particular method of primer removal so as not to leave any >detrimental effect ? > A 50/50 mix of acetone and lacquer thinner works very well for removing VariPrime. Scott Gesele N506RV (Final assembly, final paint) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RMille6453(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 22, 1997
Subject: Re: Builders in the Oakland area
Hi Dave I live in Oakdale, 80 miles east of Oakland. Id be happy to show my -8 project. You're welcome to come by. Rob Miller RV-8 Wing #2 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: Gene Gottschalk <geneg(at)rattler.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: New Builder and Questions
Dave, When I registered with the FAA as a builder they sent me a package with the paperwork and directions for obtaining an "N" number. It worked as described, all you need is patience. There is a link in the AVWEB (http://www.avweb.com/,among other places I'm sure) to check for available "N" numbers. Same goes for registration, just follow the directions. You did register your intent to build with the FAA didn't you? >How do you reserve an "N" number? > >David Wheaton RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: Don McNamara <mcnamara(at)sbt.infi.net>
Subject: Re: New Builder and Questions
David Wheaton wrote: > > > My first post to the list. Received my -6 tail kit the first part of June > and have really been collecting tools and learning as I go so far. I have > the rear HS spar ready to prime and I am also working on the front HS spar > too. I have done a little searching in the rv-list and it has been very > helpful so far. > > What do I have to do to the Alcad before I prime it? Does it need to be > roughed up a bit? I will be using a zinc chromate primer I purchased from > Aircraft Spruce. > > How do you reserve an "N" number? > > David Wheaton RV-6 > Rosamond CA > Building the HS spars "Oh no, the PRIMER THREAD!! Everybody run! Grab the kids and head for the cellar, Ma! I'll get the goats and chickens! Lordy, not again! Auntie Em, Auntie Em..." David, welcome. There are just some subjects that seem to ruffle feathers more than others. Primers and priming methods are just one of many. Check the archives first and save yourself some grief. As far as N-number reservation, the most helpful avenue seems to be (as unlikely as it sounds) to call the FAA @ 405/954-4206. The lady I spoke with was very helpful and courteous. She must be a temp. Good luck & welcome! --Don McNamara RV-8 wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RBusick505(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 22, 1997
Subject: Re: changing incedence angle
<< Wait a minute. Incendence angle with respect to what - the fuselage or the horizontal stab? I always thought that when not otherwise specified the incedence angle of the wing was assumed (oh, oh, there's that word) to mean relative to the HS. If that's the case, wouldn't it be easier to move the leading edge of the HS rather than the wing? >> The people that have done this, do it to the wing when they initially drill the rear spar to the fuselage. If the wing is already drilled, then you are right, you can only change the HS. Unfortunately, they do not have a baseline to compare their speed improvements. But a fast RV is a fast RV and if you want to beleive that it is faster because of a change to the incident angle, then that is OK with me. As I said in the original post, any improvements to Van's design will be met with some controversy. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RBusick505(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 22, 1997
Subject: Re: RV-List Speed With Economy
<< > >In Kent Paser's book "Speed with Economy" he lists all kinds of ways > that > an > >RV type A/C can improve the top end speed without adding more HP. > Great > >book. > > You can order direct from: > Paser Publications > 5672 West Chestnut Ave > Littleton, Colorado 80123 > > Price 24.95 plus 3.5 shipping > > Phone 303 979-3666 For those of us not in the USA, does anyone know whether they take Visa? Also, whether they have a fax number? >> No fax, no visa, foreign orders add $10 for shipping and handling, for you lucky people in Colorado add 4.8% tax. I don't work for or know Kent Paser, nor do I gain anything from the sale. I just read the book. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 22, 1997
Subject: Re: changing incedence angle
<< Wait a minute. Incendence angle with respect to what - the fuselage or the horizontal stab? I always thought that when not otherwise specified the incedence angle of the wing was assumed (oh, oh, there's that word) to mean relative to the HS. If that's the case, wouldn't it be easier to move the leading edge of the HS rather than the wing? Bruce Stobbe >> Hmm.... Now I recall a speed mod to the Navion that did change the horiz stab incedence. Maybe the original poster of the mod could explain the setup? Check six! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: Al Mojzisik <prober(at)iwaynet.net>
Subject: Speed With Economy # diconnected
RV-List message posted by: >RBusick505(at)aol.com >> >In Kent Paser's book "Speed with Economy" he lists all kinds of ways >> that an RV type A/C can improve the top end speed without adding more >>HP. Great book. >> >> You can order direct from: >> Paser Publications >> 5672 West Chestnut Ave >> Littleton, Colorado 80123 >> >> Price 24.95 plus 3.5 shipping >> >> Phone 303 979-3666 I tried this phone number twice and they said it's disconnected with no more info. Al ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: Bob Moore <bobmoore(at)wwd.net>
Subject: Re: changing incedence angle
juno.com!bstobbe(at)matronics.com wrote: > Wait a minute. Incendence angle with respect to what - the fuselage or > the horizontal stab? I always thought that when not otherwise specified > the incedence angle of the wing was assumed (oh, oh, there's that word) > to mean relative to the HS. If that's the case, wouldn't it be easier to > move the leading edge of the HS rather than the wing? Definition Time: Angle of Incidence - The angle between the wing chord line and the fuselage reference or datum line. Decalage Angle - The angle between the wing chord line and the chord line of the horizontal stabilizer. Reference: "The Design of the Aeroplane" Darrol Stinton Bob Moore ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Moore" <dmoore8(at)tuelectric.com>
Subject: Re: primer on the fuel tank ribs
Date: Jul 22, 1997
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01BC9692.DCD88420 Kam Yuk Cheng wrote: > While priming the ribs, we also primed the ribs for the fuel tank. Can > anyone tell us : > (a) must we ensure the removal of the primer ? What is the reason ? If you leave it, you have to be assured that it won't soften, peel, or dissolve in the stuff you put in the tank (auto gas, avgas, and the wide range of additives). > (b) any particular method of primer removal so as not to leave any > detrimental effect ? Try laquer thinner or MEK (methyl ethyl ketone). Not knowing what type of primer you used, this is a guess. There should be no detrimental effect. You haven't prosealed it yet, have you? ------=_NextPart_000_01BC9692.DCD88420

Kam Yuk Cheng wrote:


> = While priming the ribs, we also primed the ribs for the fuel tank. = Can
> anyone tell us :
> (a) must we ensure the removal of = the primer ? What is the reason ?

If you leave it, you have to be = assured that it won't soften, peel, or dissolve in the stuff you put in = the tank (auto gas, avgas, and the wide range of = additives).


> (b) any particular method of primer removal = so as not to leave any
> detrimental effect ?

Try laquer = thinner or MEK (methyl ethyl ketone).  Not knowing what type of = primer you used, this is a guess.  There should be no detrimental = effect.  You haven't prosealed it yet, have you?


------=_NextPart_000_01BC9692.DCD88420-- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tim Lewis" <timrv6a@denmark-c.it.earthlink.net>
Date: Jul 22, 1997
Subject: Battery stud size, control knob size, etc
I'm in the midst of assembling the instrument panel and wiring my -6A. A few questions for those who have gone before: - How big are the studs on Concorde A/C batteries (probably 5/16 or 3/8")? - Is the Concorde battery Van's sells OK for aerobatic use (description says "will not leak")? Does the battery box need to be vented? I plan to use Aircraft Spruce control cables for my throttle, mixtrue, and prop. I like the A-790 type design because ACS offers it with FAA standard control knobs. I'd like to order the cables now so I can finish fabricating my sub-panel, but I don't know the exact length I'll need. Fortunately, the A-790 can be cut to length later, which is a nice feature. I'm quite ignorant of engine control mounting issues, so here are some questions: -Does anybody know the diameter of the A0-790 control knobs? How about the diameter of the nuts which attach the control to the instument panel? - Can the A-790 be secured to an engine bracket with plain old AN742 clamps, or will those not hold the cable securely enough? - Will "B" nut type cable clamps (purchase or home-made per Bengalis) work for throttle, mixture, and prop governor applications? - Would it be better to get A-750 style cables (10-32 threaded end, ball-socket construction) like Gary VanRemortel talks about in the archives? I'd have to wait until I know exact cable length, in that case. Thanks in advance. Sometimes the unknowns are overwhelming. Tim ------------------------------------ Tim Lewis N47TD (reserved) RV-6AQ #60023 San Antonio TX timrv6a(at)earthlink.net or timrv6a(at)iname.com ------------------------------------ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stephen J. Soule" <SSoule(at)pfclaw.com>
Subject: primer on the fuel tank ribs
Date: Jul 22, 1997
charset="iso-8859-1" Just make sure that you roughen and clean the rib flanges before applying the sealant. It will only take minutes. Van's says in the construction manual that acetone has been known to cause the sealant to fail to adhere to the tank skin if used as a cleaner. Steve Soule Huntington, Vermont <...A 50/50 mix of acetone and lacquer thinner works very well for removing VariPrime....> ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: Wesley T Robinson <wesleyt(at)twave.net>
Subject: digital level
I am looking for a digital level to level my fuse jig. Where might I get one? The AS&S catalog did not have one in it. Any suggestions? Wesley ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Btinn(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 22, 1997
Subject: Re: Nose wheel shimmy
I wouldn't be too concerned about the nose wheel shimmy on your 6A. It will likely be no problem for you. My builder friends seem to have no problem with it and I have been flying a Grumman Cheetah for several years with a similar arrangement with no shimmy problem at all. I can't say the same for our other club plane, however, a C-172. It certainly is no reason to reconsider your purchase of the 6A. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 22, 1997
Subject: Re: changing incedence angle
<< It is all related, wing, tail and fuselage. Tail will corrects for the wing, but you can end up "dragging" the fuselage with built in errors on wing angle being corrected by the HS. >> Don't forget Thrust line! I learned about that from the PT-19 control line a/c I flew as a youngster- the firewall was adjustable for different handling. With a bunch of "down thrust", the thing was very stable. My 5 yr old brother could fly the thing! I couldn't tell a speed difference, but it sure wouldn't loop, even with the mods I installed. I guess I started "fixing" things when I was pretty young. Check six! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: "I THINK, THEREFORE YOU ARE" <PKIRKPATRICK(at)FAB9.intel.com>
Subject: Re: New Builder and Questions
UH-OH.... Did I miss something? What is this "Intent To Build " thing? All I did was stopped by the local FSDO and they gave me a packet. When I sent in my N-Number reservation they didn't mention anything either. All you have to do to register for an N-Number is type up a letter stating that you are requesting one and that the aircraft has never been registered before referencing some FAR ( can't remember the number but its in the registration section ) and send it to Oklahoma with 10 bucks. Put down a few choices in case your first pick isn't availible. All of the info is in the FAR's for the address and stuff. You can also call them, they were even helpful. I got lucky and got my first choice, but I also checked out the numbers on the AVWEB search page first to make sure they were avail. I sent the letter in about 2 months ago and had a reply within 2 weeks. I hear this is record time so I figure someone was bucking for a promotion in the registration department. Good luck, Pat Kirkpatrick Rio Rancho NM N97WK (res)- 6A wing skins ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: "Larry D. Hoatson" <lhoatson(at)empirenet.com>
Subject: Re: New Builder and Questions
> > What do I have to do to the Alcad before I prime it? Does it need to > be > roughed up a bit? I will be using a zinc chromate primer I purchased > from > Aircraft Spruce. > Etch the metal, rinse WELL, dry and prime. I don't rough up anything that isn't corroded. > +++ Larry D. Hoatson Yucaipa, CA Redlands (L12) Airport lhoatson(at)empirenet.com Restoring Cessna 170A N9948A...Looking forward to RV6 "Either Raise Your Skill Level... ...or lower your standards!" ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ken_Hitchmough(at)magic.ca (Ken Hitchmough)
Date: Jul 22, 1997
Subject: Re: Battery stud size, control knob size, etc
- How big are the studs on Concorde A/C batteries (probably 5/16 or 3/8")? Sorry, can't answer this one but a point worth noting is that I just changed from a gel cell to a concord. Watch out! the terminals are on the OTHER side of the battery so make sure you cut cable length and route to handle the concord. Ken RV6A Flying. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ken_Hitchmough(at)magic.ca (Ken Hitchmough)
Date: Jul 22, 1997
Subject: Heat shielding fuel lines.
I thought I'd let the list know about something I've recently tried on my fuel injected 360 in my '6A.... I'd been having a problem with the engine surging after it had heat soaked on a hot day. It only happened at idle/taxi and was ok when power was applied. Nevertheless it was quite disconcerting and I made several attempts to cure the problem by re routing fuel lines etc. I have no return path to the tank for fuel vapours which would probably have cured the problem quite easily. My next attempt was going to be relocating the gascolator from the engine compartment to the wing route to keep the fuel cool. (I may still do this). However I read somewhere about a tape that is used in race cars around the fuel lines as they seem to have similar problems that we do. My local hardware store had a roll of insulating tape with a shiny metal side and a sticky foam side about 2 inches wide. I stuck piece on my heat muff for a couple of months to see how it would behave in the heat. I also tried to set fire to it with a blowtorch. Both tests showed it was fire resistant and it did not decay or harden while on the heat muff. So...I proceeded to wrap my long fuel lines (which are already firesleeved) with the stuff. The result has been significant so far. I still get very minor surging but nowhere near as bad as I used to. I don't think this is a substitute for having a return line, so one day I MAY put one in but it has most certainly helped me. I believe firesleeve is to protect against flame. I think its protection against radiant heat is probably minimal so the shiny metal surface on the tape acts like a very long heat shield. At this stage I don't know if there will be any long term effects on the tape...only time will tell. Ken RV6A Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: Mike Wills <willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil>
Subject: register intent to build?
Please tell me that this isnt some FAA requirement that I have been blissfully unaware of for the past 2 years while building my -4! Ive never heard of registering an intent to build with FAA. Do I need too? I have been advised by local EAA'ers to postpone reserving an N number until further into construction for tax reasons. Supposedly there have been cases of builders having to pay taxes for owning an aircraft, when all they really owned at the time was a pile of parts, or raw material. Any truth to this rumor? Mike Wills RV-4 (wings) willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil You >did register your intent to build with the FAA didn't you? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BARNES_ERIC(at)tandem.com
Date: Jul 22, 1997
Subject: Re: Cutting HS Tip Ribs
I had the same question - I think this was done, but just left out of the video (can't remember if he references it verbally or not). I was able to squeeze the rib in without cutting, but of course the flange didn't contact the spar like it should. Anyway, I'm building an -8, and asked my -6 friends about it, and it's the same on both. Inner tip rib needs to be cut out to clear the HS-x10 & HS-x14 pieces. EB #80131 PS - I think if you look at the video closely you can see it cut out on the rib though, or at least kinda tell G.O. is drilling in the center area of the flange. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Moore" <dmoore8(at)tuelectric.com>
Subject: Re: digital level
Date: Jul 22, 1997
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01BC96B6.0991DDE0 Wesley Robinson asked: > I am looking for a digital level to level my fuse jig. Where might I get > one? The AS&S catalog did not have one in it. Any suggestions? If you are looking for the best tools around, Smart Levels are available from many hardware stores as well as Avery's. However, I used a cheap "bubble" type carpenter's level and it worked just fine. Just check its accuracy first (see the builder's manual). ------=_NextPart_000_01BC96B6.0991DDE0

Wesley Robinson asked:

> I am = looking for a digital level to level my fuse jig. Where might I = get
> one? The AS&S catalog did not have one in it. Any = suggestions?


If you are looking for the best tools around, = Smart Levels are available from many hardware stores as well as Avery's. =  However, I used a cheap "bubble" type carpenter's level = and it worked just fine.  Just check its accuracy first (see the = builder's manual).

------=_NextPart_000_01BC96B6.0991DDE0-- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: Bubba Joe <Bubbajoe(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: RV4 first flight
RV-4 (N65KK) first flew on July 11,1997 in North Little Rock,Arkansas. Keith Kreth is the pilot and builder of this award winning "4"!!! I talked with Keith on Monday,July 21 and found out about his feat!! Plane is off-white with red and blue accents,0-320 E3D with the new Sensenich metal prop.So far he has achieved most all positive aerobatic manuvers and has reached a top cruse speed of 190 mph ias.This plane has been my inspiration and I wish Keith the best!! Richard Miller...RV-4 empennage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rcowens126(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 22, 1997
Subject: Re: Nose wheel shimmy
I've read lots of stuff about nose wheel shimmy here, but not the one thing that cured the shimmy on my Ercoupe back in the good old days. She was very sensitive to precise rotational balance. Try it on your -6A. Bob Owens Helping son, Laird with wing skins on -6. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: nutplate torque values
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: "Sam Ray" <str(at)almaden.ibm.com>
AC43.13 lists torque values for all sorts of nuts, but not for any platenuts. Anybody out there seen anything in PRINT they can refer me to? Regards, Sam ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BARNES_ERIC(at)tandem.com
Date: Jul 22, 1997
Subject: Lightspeed 20K Headsets - Great Buy!
At Jim Cone's recommendation, I purchased a set of the Lightspeed 20K headsets, and thought I'd post my initial impressions. They're wonderful! Comfort is unsurpassed, and the ANR (active noise canceling) is pure pleasure in the 172 I've been flying lately. The 20K makes it sound like an extremely quiet Katana. Even with the ANR turned off, they're VERY quiet. My point of reference is a set of David Clarks prior to the 13.4 model. I haven't worn them on flights longer than 2 hours, but can't imagine them becoming even noticable to me. As it is, I forget I have them on. They weigh 16 oz. (and that must include the small battery/volume control box located about 6 inches from the plugs), are stereo/mono, and have individual volume controls and a battery meter. According to Jim, they sample the incoming signal so as NOT to cut out the bass on the stereo. I have yet to try out this feature. I did found a slight hiss, but only noticed it when I was trying them out at home. It's really not noticable in the plane, even when I listen for it. If you're in the market, I think these are worth the $. They're at least worth comparing if you can find them at the larger airshows. At $375, for ANR, they're a bargan too! The 15K model is available with ANR also, for even $80 less. Mark "Check Six!" sells these units (I found out after I ordered them from Gulf Coast), if you're interested. They also are reviewed on the current AVWEB, and the company webpage is http://www.teleport.com/%7Elitspeed/we04000.htm They are apparently scheduled to go up $50 next month, but even that seems like a good price. I'll try and remember to check back in 6 months to a year and let everyone know how they hold up longer term, as they are new to the market. So far, so good! And yes, the standard disclaimer applies - I get no $ for this, and have no connection to Lightspeed what-so-ever. EB #80131 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: Don McNamara <mcnamara(at)sbt.infi.net>
Subject: Re: New Builder and Questions
Gene Gottschalk wrote: > When I registered with the FAA as a builder they sent me a package... You did register your intent to build with the FAA didn't you? OK, Gene...what's this stuff about "registering your intent to build?" If there's something I need to do along that line, I probably should look into it before I start the fuselage, huh? Sounds like this might be information that lots of us could use. Thanks. --Don McNamara ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: Robert Acker <r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Seat hinge
I am mounting my RV-6 seats but don't have seat belts yet. I was wondering how far back the seats can be mounted before they interfere with the belt attachment point & hardware. FYI I am trying to maximize leg room, and will be moving the seat back brace (slider canopy) 3" aft. Thanks in advance. Rob Acker / r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com / RV-6Q ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WBRV(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 22, 1997
Subject: Re: New Builder and Questions
>How do you reserve an N number < Reserved mine at Oshkosh last year. A table was set up in the FAA building with 2 friendly ladies and a laptop computer. They looked up and printed out available N numbers, and had the necessary paperwork to file a request. Very Easy. Wayne Buescher RV6 QB ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)navix.net>
Subject: Pop rivets
Fellow RVers, I'm looking for specifications on various pop rivets. We are looking into replacing the round head, #4 AAPQ-42 pop rivets used in a lot of places on the Glastar kit with flush pop rivets of equall or greater strength. I don't have specs on the AAPQ rivets but do have the specs in the Aircraft Spruce catalog on various flush, pop rivets. What I'm trying to find out is whether the round head #4s can be replaced with a flush, #3 pop rivet such as the MK319BS flush rivets that we use on the RVs. I did call Stoddard-Hamilton but they do not approve of any substitution as they have not tested anything other than what's flown. For instance, on the Glastar wing, the leading edge ribs and leading edge to front spar are all flush. From the front spar, aft, they specify round head rivets on the 6 ribs and 16 hat section stiffners. The owner of the Glastar kit decided to flush the whole wing (I didn't object, btw.) Speaking of Glastars, after a just about a year of working with Capt. Bill on his Glastar, this will be my last week. He's going to be gone for a month, starting next week and I'm going to start packing for the move to Wyoming. Looking at all of the stuff in my 30 x 45 shop makes me a little weak in the knees when I think about moving but I'm anxious to set up my new shop and get back to work on my second RV. Building the Glastar has been an interesting experience. It also makes me glad that I build RVs. The RV series is still the best bang for the buck in kits and is a lot more fun and easier to build well than a Glastar, IMO. If you RVers see a well done Glastar, you should tip your hats (even though it's partly fiberglass). They have a much more involved (and expensive) kit. Also, I don't know why anyone would want to fly that slow:) Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)navix.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: "Scott A. Jordan" <SAJ_SLJ(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: R-410 fit
The plans for the RV-8 show the R-410 bracket being riveted with three CS-4-6 rivets to the rudder skin and the flange of the R-404 rib. When I= fit the R-410 (which is pre-bent by Vans) in place the sides do not come = up flush with the rib flanges, leaving a gap between the parts. If I simply= bend the sides out they will meet the flange but not be flush against it.= = I have thought of two "fixes". I could simple rivet one side then pry it= over to rivet the second before riveting the 410's tabs to teh rib and rudder horn. I wonder if this won't creat stresses I don't want. The second fix would be to put another bend in the sides and create tabs that= will be flush on the flanges but I wonder if this will weaken the structure. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks Scott A. Jordan 80331 N733JJ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: Leo Davies <leo(at)icn.su.OZ.AU>
Subject: Re: primer on the fuel tank ribs
>>While priming the ribs, we also primed the ribs for the fuel tank. Can >>anyone tell us : >>(a) must we ensure the removal of the primer ? What is the reason ? >> >>(b) any particular method of primer removal so as not to leave any >>detrimental effect ? >You do not want fuel to slowly dissolve your primer and be contaminated. >If you can't get it off using a solvent or some other relatively easy >method, why not just buy a new set from Van's? MEK (Methyl Ethyl Ketone) will remove primer nicely. Be careful with it, highly flammable and moderately toxic (wear an organic vapour filter in your respirator). Leo Davies ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: Phil Arter <philip.arter(at)mci2000.com>
Subject: Re: Cutting HS Tip Ribs
Scott M. Kuebler wrote: > > > Hi everybody, > One more question before I start skinning the HS. I have the > Orndorff, Pre-punched RV-6, -6a, 8, empannage video. In that video they are > building the -8, but they say there is no difference between the -6's > and the -8 besides the rudder, which brings me to my question: > In the video, when placing the center tip rib, it doesn't look > like they cut the rib to fit the HS-610 & HS-614 angles. Instead they just > place it on the angles and drill through it. Is this a differnece > between the -6 & -8, or is it just a different way to attach the rib. > Thanks in advance for the help. > > Scott Kuebler > RV-6, (not cutting anything untill I figure this out) > Scott, hi On the -8, the HS-404 ribs are cut to fit between the spar reinforcing angles. -- Phil Arter, RV-8 #80005 philip.arter(at)mci2000.com http://acd.ucar.edu/~arter/RV8.html (303)459-0435 home ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: catbird(at)taylortel.com (TTC Carroll A. Bird)
Subject: Re: digital level
Wesley T Robinson wrote: > > > I am looking for a digital level to level my fuse jig. Where might I get > one? The AS&S catalog did not have one in it. Any suggestions? > > If you have a Lowes building center they may have them. They do in Abilene Texas. Carroll ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: "Scott A. Jordan" <SAJ_SLJ(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: Cutting HS Tip Ribs
>>In the video, when placing the center tip rib, it doesn't look like they cut the rib to fit the HS-610 & HS-614 angles. Instead they just place it on the angles and drill through it. Is this a differnece between the -6 & -8, or is it just a different way to attach the rib.<< Scott, I haven't seen the video but drawing 3PP of the RV-8 has a detail of the = HS ribs. It states to trim the HS-404 rib to fit over the 810 & 814 angles.= = Don't cut any more than you absolutly have to. The flange is small after= cutting and you need to get two rivets in there with proper clearances. = Mine shows no sign of stress cracks yet but then again, its only been in teh rafters for about a mont. ;-) Scott A. Jordan 80331 N733JJ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: "les williams" <lesliebwilliams(at)msn.com>
Subject: Nose wheel shimmy
Steve, I wouldn't get the idea that "nose wheel shimmy" is a common problem on the RV-6A or any of the other numerous aircraft that use similar designs. I would guess that anyone with a recurring problem has either a bad assembly or incorrect adjustment of the parts that I mentioned in my earlier post. Also, Ken Hitchmough's suggestion to tighten it a little more than specified and keeping the weight off as long as possible after touchdown would help (the elevator authority of the RV will keep the nose up until almost turn-off speed if you just keep pulling back to the stop as you slow down). I re-iterate that the nosewheel tire pressure is important as is the mains to keep them from shimmying; too much and you will also bounce like a rubber ball if you touch down nose first or drop it on! This is one negative aspect of the Wittman style gear. JMHO. Les Williams/RV-6AQB/Tacoma WA ---------- From: owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com on behalf of Stephen J. Soule Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 1997 5:15 AM Subject: RE: RV-List: Nose wheel shimmy Dang it! I knew that as soon as I finally made up my mind and ordered the RV-6A I would find out there was a downside to the nose wheel! Steve Soule Huntington, Vermont (RV-6A fuselage kit on order) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)navix.net>
Subject: Re: digital level
>I am looking for a digital level to level my fuse jig. Where might I get >one? The AS&S catalog did not have one in it. Any suggestions? > >Wesley Wesley, I own a digital level and they are handy. However, there may be a cheaper, more accurate and easier method to level your longerons in the fuselage jig. You'll probably still end up with a digital level 'cause "you can never own enough tools". I leveled the longerons with a water level. I had some old, worn out garden hose which I cut into various lenghts. I purchased some "T"s from a farm supply store and six lengths of clear acrylic tubing that fit inside the hose. I conected the whole works together, filled with water and positioned three tubes per side at the firewall, middle and tail of the fuselage. This method would probably be a lot faster and possibly more accurate than the level. Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)navix.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: David Wheaton <dwheaton(at)csi.com>
Subject: New Builder and Questions
Date: Jul 22, 1997
Thanks for all the inputs. Sorry to ruffle feathers if I did. I am not much of a painter type so I really do not know much about it. I found the search engines for the list on the Web and have since also found some of the past threads on priming. Once again, many thanks to all who responded both on the list and off-line. David Wheaton RV-6 Rosamond, CA HS spars ________________________________________________________________________________
From: cecilth(at)juno.com
Subject: Re: digital level
<33D4E6B6.136F(at)twave.net>
Date: Jul 22, 1997
Seems I saw one in the last Avery catalog I got. Home depot sells them to. I looked into getting one but just got the old trusty regular leval I've used for years, calibrated it very carefully and saved myself some money. It does the job. Cecil Hatfield 6A fuslage ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: Denny Harjehausen <retflygtiger(at)proaxis.com>
Subject: Canopy
I've got a question on the height of roll bar. I have checked the height via a projected line up the fuselage formers and it appears as the roll bar is about a inch and a quarter above this projected line. Looking at many past gathering photos I have taken the roll bar looks too high in comparison. The roll bar measures the correct according to the plans. Was this height increased with the new one canopy fits the tip and slide? Is this a trim to suit? Thanks! Have a Great Day! Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH Fuselage-top side Lebanon, OR ________________________________________________________________________________
From: jpl(at)showpg.mn.org (Joe Larson)
Subject: Re: register intent to build?
Date: Jul 22, 1997
You don't need to contact the FAA until you're nearly ready to fly. Before you can fly, you need an inspection. Before the inspection, you need an N- number. The EAA has a book about all this. But no, you don't need to tell the FAA anything until you're ready to paint that N-number. And yes, the FAA tells the states that you've registered an N-number. Governments being governments, they happily say, "Oh goody. Another airplane to tax." Some states are more stupid than others and don't understand it's not an airplane yet. So yes, some states will try to tax you for your N-number. I don't know if they actually succeed. "I tell you what -- you come point out my airplane to me, and I'll happily pay your tax bill" sounds like a good argument. -Joe > > Please tell me that this isnt some FAA requirement that I have been > blissfully unaware of for the past 2 years while building my -4! Ive never > heard of registering an intent to build with FAA. Do I need too? I have been > advised by local EAA'ers to postpone reserving an N number until further > into construction for tax reasons. Supposedly there have been cases of > builders having to pay taxes for owning an aircraft, when all they really > owned at the time was a pile of parts, or raw material. Any truth to this rumor? > > > You > > >did register your intent to build with the FAA didn't you? -- Joe Larson jpl(at)showpg.mn.org 612-551-1072 14190 47th Ave N. http://www.wavefront.com/~showpg Plymouth, Mn 55446 Future RV-6A pilot. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: QFA1(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 22, 1997
Subject: Re: airman knowledge
This must have been originally posted by a furiner. As a CFI, I can't possibly recall the meaning of DVA !??!! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6AIR(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 22, 1997
Subject: Re: digital level
Wesly: Tools on Sale (612-224-4859) has them. Bob Lovering ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: Shirley Hobenshield <shobenshield(at)cmsd.bc.ca>
Subject: Re: First Flight C-GDOC
Dr. John, I have been watching for the day you would post the news of your loved one. C-GDOC - Neat! Perhaps C-FXXG will meet the new arrival someday. Good luck in your tests. ------- Ed Hobenshield ________________________________________________________________________________
From: jorear(at)mari.net
Date: Jul 22, 1997
Subject: HS and Wing Jig
Hello All! I am about to get started on my HS for my 6A and would like to get the opinion of the group regarding the importance of jigs that are as straight as an arrow and are dimensionally stable. I have at my disposal the ability to manufacture a jig that is made from southern pine 2x4's that are laminated together. If any of you have seen buildings that have exposed laminated wooden beams, it is of the same type of construction. I might add that the same type of laminated products were used on the recent restoration of the Constitution (aka "OLD Iron Sides"). To say the least, the end product is an extemely solid beam that is straight, and is going to stay that way. My question is, have any experienced builders out there (that is ones who have built thier wings and empenages) had any trouble with using lumberyard wood to build your jigs? Have you had problems with attaining lumber that is straight enough, and if so, has changes in humidity and temperatures been a problem? My main concern is if the above constructed jig is worth the effort, and if it is, whether other builders would be interested in being able to get such a jig. Please understand that I am not selling anything yet. Just testing the water to see if it is something that other RV'ers would see an advange in using. Last thing I want to do is get flamed here! Anyone that is interested or has an opinion can post here to the list if you think that our group would be interested in hearing it. Otherwise send me an E-mail direct at: Jeff Orear jorear(at)mari.net Thanks! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: Bob Haan <bobh(at)cdac.com>
Subject: Re: digital level
> >I am looking for a digital level to level my fuse jig. Where might I get >one? The AS&S catalog did not have one in it. Any suggestions? > >Wesley I got it from Avery Tools. Like it very much. Easy to accurately level or plumb things. Also, you can read the current position from an oblique angle to the display readout (bubble). For example, when leveling the jig, you can place the level with the display at the center of the jig either fore and aft or side to side and make adjustments at the legs and easily read from this angle to the display when the jig is level. With the standard bubble level you would have to move from the adjusting point at the leg of the jig to a position that puts your eye perpendicular to the bubble indicator and then move back to the leg of the jig to make additional adjustments. It is also good at measuring angular movement such as controls neutral to controls at max travel. It appears to be very accurate and if in doubt, you can quickly recalibrate it. Bob Bob Haan bobh(at)cdac.com Portland, OR 503-636-3550 RV6A 24461 Fuse out of jig, working on seats ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: Gil Alexander <gila(at)flash.net>
Subject: Re: register intent to build?
> >Please tell me that this isnt some FAA requirement that I have been >blissfully unaware of for the past 2 years while building my -4! Ive never >heard of registering an intent to build with FAA. Do I need too? I have been >advised by local EAA'ers to postpone reserving an N number until further >into construction for tax reasons. Supposedly there have been cases of >builders having to pay taxes for owning an aircraft, when all they really >owned at the time was a pile of parts, or raw material. Any truth to this rumor? Mike, This is possible in some states if you register your RV to soon. What you want to do at this stage is just ask for a reservation of an N-number ONLY. No aircraft details are needed. This just costs a measly $10 per year to hold on to your favorite N-number - one of the best deals from the govmitt. If you get your N-number now, and assign it to your RV, it will be shared with your state and you will be liable for Personal Property tax (at least here in CA, at the rate of 1% every year based on some arbitary value the state sets). If anyone is interested, I have a document - originally written by Herman Dierks, and updated by me - that describes how to register a homebuilt. It also has a simple form for sending to the FAA (and the telephone number on OK City) for reserving an N-number. An e-mail request to me will get you a copy (it's in Word) ... hope this helps ... Gil (I got N64GA) Alexander > >Mike Wills >RV-4 (wings) >willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil > > You >>did register your intent to build with the FAA didn't you? > > > > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > +-- --+ > > ------------------------------------ RV6A, #20701, finishing kit "REPLY" sends to entire RV-list mailto:gila(at)flash.net to reply privately ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 22, 1997
From: "Larry D. Hoatson" <lhoatson(at)empirenet.com>
Subject: Barnard Aircraft Company
Hello All, Just wanted to thank Steve Barnard for the impromptu tour of his shop, and letting us check out his products. To say that we're smitten by the cowl and the wing kits would be an understatement! Everything we saw, both shop and products certainly looked first-class! Looking forward to hearing more about the performance mods! Larry & Ellayna +++ Larry D. Hoatson Yucaipa, CA Redlands (L12) Airport lhoatson(at)empirenet.com Restoring Cessna 170A N9948A...Looking forward to RV6 "Either Raise Your Skill Level... ...or lower your standards!" ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mikel(at)dimensional.com
Date: Jul 23, 1997
Subject: Re: airman knowledge
>This must have been originally posted by a furiner. As a CFI, I can't >possibly recall the meaning of DVA !??!! Thank HEAVENS.......I thought it was just me......... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: register intent to build?
Date: Jul 23, 1997
>From owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com Wed Jul 23 02:09:29 1997 >Received: from matronics.com (uucp@localhost) > by netcomsv.netcom.com (8.8.5-r-beta/8.8.5/(NETCOM v1.01)) with UUCP >Received: by matronics.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) >Errors-To: bounces(at)matronics.com >Message-Id: <3.0.2.32.19970722201859.007e1420(at)pop.flash.net> >X-Sender: gila(at)pop.flash.net >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.2 (32) >Date: Tue, 22 Jul 1997 20:18:59 -0700 >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >From: Gil Alexander <flash.net!gila(at)matronics.com> >Subject: Re: RV-List: register intent to build? >In-Reply-To: <9707222010.AA06183(at)manta.nosc.mil> >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Sender: owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com >Precedence: bulk >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > > >> >>Please tell me that this isnt some FAA requirement that I have been >>blissfully unaware of for the past 2 years while building my -4! Ive never >>heard of registering an intent to build with FAA. Do I need too? I have been >>advised by local EAA'ers to postpone reserving an N number until further >>into construction for tax reasons. Supposedly there have been cases of >>builders having to pay taxes for owning an aircraft, when all they really >>owned at the time was a pile of parts, or raw material. Any truth to this >rumor? > >Mike, > This is possible in some states if you register your RV to soon. >What you want to do at this stage is just ask for a reservation of an >N-number ONLY. No aircraft details are needed. This just costs a measly >$10 per year to hold on to your favorite N-number - one of the best deals >from the govmitt. > > If you get your N-number now, and assign it to your RV, it will be >shared with your state and you will be liable for Personal Property tax (at >least here in CA, at the rate of 1% every year based on some arbitary value >the state sets). > > If anyone is interested, I have a document - originally written by >Herman Dierks, and updated by me - that describes how to register a >homebuilt. It also has a simple form for sending to the FAA (and the >telephone number on OK City) for reserving an N-number. > > An e-mail request to me will get you a copy (it's in Word) > > ... hope this helps ... Gil (I got N64GA) Alexander > > >> >>Mike Wills >>RV-4 (wings) >>willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil >> >> You >>>did register your intent to build with the FAA didn't you? >> >> >> >> >> +-- >--+ >> | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com > | >> | --- > | >> | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email >"rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | >> | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or >subject. | >> +-- >--+ >> >> >------------------------------------ >RV6A, #20701, finishing kit >"REPLY" sends to entire RV-list >mailto:gila(at)flash.net to reply privately > > > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > +-- --+ Yikes!! Intent to build???? Geeze, what will they think of next..a tax on my dreams? I just gotta laugh my empannage off over THIS one... Brian Denk RV-8...skinning stabilizer ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: bstobbe(at)juno.com
Subject: Re: HS and Wing Jig
Date: Jul 23, 1997
> I am about to get started on my HS for my 6A and would like to >get the opinion of the group regarding the importance of jigs that are as >straight as an arrow and are dimensionally stable< IMO the jig does not need to be perfectly straight as long as you can use it to get your assembly straight and level. However, you do want it to be relatively stable for obvious reasons. > My question is, have any experienced builders out there (that is >ones who have built thier wings and empenages) had any trouble with >using lumberyard wood to build your jigs?< I used wood from Home Depot for my tail/wing and fuselage jigs - they weren't pretty to look at but they got the job done - keeping the assembly stable and true during assembly. You do need to be somewhat selective as you go through the wood pile though, and then let the wood sit for awhile before using it so it has a chance to dry out. Try this - Go into Home Depot (or any other lumber yard for that matter) and ask them if they have a piece of wood that is 8-ft long, has a 3/4 twist along its length, and bends to the side about 3-in from level and I bet they say they don't carry anything like that - then go back to the wood pile and you'll find a whole stack of them :>) One of the 2x8s I bought for my fuselage jig which was relatively straight when I bought it became unusable as it dried in the garage - it twisted so bad that the only use I could think of was for kindling... so, be sure to let the wood dry out before using it. Bruce Stobbe RV-6 Winsted, CT ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: David Stratmoen <dstrats(at)ruralink.com>
Subject: flying high
Thanks alot for the comments on speed mods. I've got another question for you guys. How much of a headache would it be to set on rv6a up for higher flying (15 to 25,000). Has anyone had experience or know of someone who has put a turbo in an rv? Also on using oxygen. What's a good book on these subjects? Is it dueable?? comments appreciated Dave-soon to be rv6a quickbuilder ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: Frank van der Hulst <frankv(at)pec.co.nz>
Subject: Re: airman knowledge
dimensional.com!mikel(at)matronics.com wrote: > > > >This must have been originally posted by a furiner. As a CFI, I can't > >possibly recall the meaning of DVA !??!! > > Thank HEAVENS.......I thought it was just me......... It was posted by Louise Coats, a fellow Kiwi. I've never heard the term either, but didn't want seem an iggerant furriner. I guess it must be a wimmin thing. :-) Frank. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: Rick and Barbara Osgood <randbosgood(at)sprintmail.com>
Subject: Re: HS and Wing Jig
mari.net!jorear(at)matronics.com wrote: > > Hello All! > > I am about to get started on my HS for my 6A and would like to > get > the opinion of the group regarding the importance of jigs that are as > straight as an arrow and are dimensionally stable. >>>> >>> Snip > Anyone that is interested or has an opinion can post here to the > list if you think that our group would be interested in hearing it. > Otherwise send me an E-mail direct at: > > Jeff Orear > jorear(at)mari.net > > Thanks! I have found most "Lumberyard" wood to be usable but not straight. The best methods I have seen for building a wing jig, is to get a sheet of 1/2" to 3/4" good quality plywood and rip it into 4 to 5 inch strips to whatever length is required. Build a box out of these strips by gluing and screwing four strips together. This method will get straight and solid wing jig upright posts. The center, being 109" is a little more difficult. I have seen 2 x 4's with a plywood sandwich used well. Hope this helps Rick Osgood randbosgood(at)sprintmail.com RV6A wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Eckstein" <eckstein@net-link.net>
Subject: Re: digital level
Date: Jul 23, 1997
Try 'Tools on Sale' a division of Seven Corners Hardware in St. Paul, MN.= They are usually the cheapest and they pay freight. Look in the archiv= es for their 800 number or send me a message and I can rely Brian Eckstein ---------- > > I am looking for a digital level to level my fuse jig. Where might I = get > one? The AS&S catalog did not have one in it. Any suggestions? > > Wesley > > > > +-- = --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.c= om | > | --- = | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request@matronics= .com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or sub= ject. | > +-- = --+ > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: Gene Gottschalk <geneg(at)rattler.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Registration
Hum, I was under the impression this was a requirement, I didn't mean to cause a panic.I though I read it in Van's instructions, or a least somewhere in the vast amount of information I acquired before starting construction. I'll try to dig out the appropriate passage and post it. I called the FAA and notified them as soon as I signed the agreement with Van's Aircraft. I called the local FAA FSDO and told them I was about to begin construction and they were very helpful, and talked a great length about Van's and experimental airplanes in general. They gave me the names of local inspectors, and suggested (strongly) I join the EAA. They sent a nice package detailing the "N" number and registration process, complete with a duplicate set of forms and a flow chart so even I could figure out the process. -Gene Gottschalk >>>> Please tell me that this isnt some FAA requirement that I have been blissfully unaware of for the past 2 years while building my -4! Ive never heard of registering an intent to build with FAA. Do I need too? I have been advised by local EAA'ers to postpone reserving an N number until further into construction for tax reasons. Supposedly there have been cases of builders having to pay taxes for owning an aircraft, when all they really owned at the time was a pile of parts, or raw material. Any truth to this rumor? <<<<<<<< ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: Denny Harjehausen <retflygtiger(at)proaxis.com>
Subject: Re: HS and Wing Jig
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: Denny Harjehausen <retflygtiger(at)proaxis.com>
Subject: Re: Canopy
> >I've got a question on the height of roll bar. I have checked the height >via a projected line up the fuselage formers and it appears as the roll bar >is about a inch and a quarter above this projected line. Looking at many >past gathering photos I have taken the roll bar looks too high in >comparison. The roll bar measures the correct according to the plans. > > Was this height increased with the new one canopy fits the tip and >slide? > > Is this a trim to suit? > >Thanks! ** Sorry The Above Is On a Tip Up Canopy. Thanks Again! Have a Great Day! Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH Fuselage-top side Lebanon, OR ________________________________________________________________________________
From: jpl(at)showpg.mn.org (Joe Larson)
Subject: Re: HS and Wing Jig
Date: Jul 23, 1997
You don't need absolutely straight lumber for the jigs. In fact, you must assume that your material is not straight. It's nice if you can find wood that doesn't twist, but even this isn't critical. For instance -- the cross piece. You draw a line approximately down the center of the piece. But you draw a *straight* line, which means it won't be right down the center if the piece is slightly curved. You make references then from the line, not the jig itself. Similar behavior with the vertical pieces. Of course, if the material *is* straight, so much the better. Regarding changes due to humidity, etc -- you assume this will happen, too. Your empennage pieces aren't in the jig all that long a period during which absolute plumb is an important factor. It only takes a weekend to skin the skeleton of an individual empennage piece, and that's as long as plumb is critical. For the wing -- you also assume change in the jig. So you check your plumb lines at the start of each work session and perhaps whenever you happen to be in the general neighborhood of one of 'em. So -- worth the effort? Depends. Is the effort 2 or 3 hours extra, or 20? -Joe >... > I am about to get started on my HS for my 6A and would like to get > the opinion of the group regarding the importance of jigs that are as > straight as an arrow and are dimensionally stable. I have at my > disposal the ability to manufacture a jig that is made from southern > pine 2x4's that are laminated together. If any of you have seen > buildings that have exposed laminated wooden beams, it is of the same > type of construction. > ... > > My question is, have any experienced builders out there (that is > ones who have built thier wings and empenages) had any trouble with > using lumberyard wood to build your jigs? Have you had problems with > attaining lumber that is straight enough, and if so, has changes in > humidity and temperatures been a problem? My main concern is if the > above constructed jig is worth the effort, and if it is, whether other > builders would be interested in being able to get such a jig. > ... -- Joe Larson jpl(at)showpg.mn.org 612-551-1072 14190 47th Ave N. http://www.wavefront.com/~showpg Plymouth, Mn 55446 Future RV-6A pilot. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: HS and Wing Jig
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: "William H. Watson" <watson1(at)alink.net>
>Hello All! > > I am about to get started on my HS for my 6A and would like to get >the opinion of the group regarding the importance of jigs that are as >straight as an arrow and are dimensionally stable Having just completed this phase of construction, and true to advice = given here many times, it really doesn't matter how straight the jig = lumber is (within reason). It does matter that it is dimentionally = stable. You will establish a straight building line with a plumb = bob. Even the verticles are not that important as the plumb bob will = tell you where the top of the horiz-stab should be. You can even = shim the brackets on the horizontal beam if necessary. Here is some = other advice: If you can, =80 Get the Avery longeron and one inch, holeless yoke (with the = small yoke you can squeeze almost all the edge rivets in the jig; = with the longeron yoke you can squeeze most of the skeleton rivets = which is easier when you are getting started). =80 Get the small bucking bar, about 3", almost square, about 1" = thick ( I got from Avery); IMHO, it is essential for the skins. If you have any money left, =80 Get the Avery swivel mushroom riveting head for you gun, = especially if you plan to rivet the skin by yourself as I did. Have fun. Bill Watson Finishing the Emp Wings parts still in box Watson1(at)alink.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: "Scott A. Jordan" <SAJ_SLJ(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: Re: R-410 fit
>>It is interesting that the -410 was pre-bent, on mine I had to make tha= t part from scratch.<< Phil, It wasn't completely made. It came as a square "U" channel with cut mark= s drawn. Simply had to cut on the line, drill the lightning hole and bend the end tabs. There was some discussion here not to long ago about how t= o make the part and what it is supposed to look like when done. Looks like= Vans decided to make it a bit easier but the U channel they have isn't qu= it wide enough. Thanks for the answer, it seemed like the better way to go. Scott A. Jordan 80331 N733JJ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: dougm(at)mailhost.physio-control.com (Doug Medema)
Subject: Re: Seat hinge
> > > I am mounting my RV-6 seats but don't have seat belts yet. I was wondering > how far back the seats can be mounted before they interfere with the belt > attachment point & hardware. > > FYI I am trying to maximize leg room, and will be moving the seat back brace > (slider canopy) 3" aft. > > Thanks in advance. > > Rob Acker / r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com / RV-6Q > Rob: I have also been looking into moving the rearmost seat attachment back as I am 6'-6" tall with long legs. I looked at a lot of RVs at Arlington and noticed that the front seat belts for the -4s actually go through the seat. I asked Van's about doing this on my -6A and he said it would probably work though he didn't remember the exact geometry. One issue I noticed is that the seat belt mounts on the -4 are farther away from the seat and thus the seat belt web went through the hole in the seat. On the -6s, you might have to make the hole big enough to for the bracket that the web attaches too. I visited with Art Chard when I picked up my fuselage kit and picked up an idea from a -6 he was working on regarding the bulkhead behind the seat (I believe it's F-605 or F-606). He had fluted the vertical members just above the rear spar attach point to get them to angle back. I duplicated this and then put a V in this part just below the part that goes across the cockpit. I built it such that the cross member is 1 1/2 inches back. I had asked Van about this at Arlington '96 and he thought this would be fine. So far everything has worked out ok with the fuselage skins drilled, but not riveted. || |< - cut and bent here. Rivited on reinforcing plate over "V" // // // // // -- fluted here || Like almost all changes, this fairly simple change added a bunch of extra work. I had to make an extension for the arm rest since the distance between the bulkheads had increased when I angled back the bulkhead. I also had to shorten the rib between the seatback bulkhead and the baggage compartment. Finally, I had to make the reinforcement plate over the "V". However, I would do this change again. I'm going to wait till I have my seatbelts before I place the rear most seat attachment. Please keep the list posted on what you did. Doug Medema. RV-6A. Making the access holes for the elevator control horns. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: Alan Carroll <carroll(at)geology.wisc.edu>
Subject: Re: R-410 fit
>The plans for the RV-8 show the R-410 bracket being riveted with three >CS-4-6 rivets to the rudder skin and the flange of the R-404 rib. When I >fit the R-410 (which is pre-bent by Vans) in place the sides do not come up >flush with the rib flanges, leaving a gap between the parts. If I simply >bend the sides out they will meet the flange but not be flush against it. Scott - I was puzzled by this too, and called Van's to check. What you do is center the R-410 relative to the rib, and then pull both sides into contact with the rib flanges for clamping and drilling. The final result looks ok, although it does tend to pull the rudder skin slightly out of shape. I don't think strength is a problem. I have no idea why the bends aren't placed in such a way to make the part fit flush! Alan Alan R. Carroll Dept. of Geology and Geophysics University of Wisconsin 1215 W. Dayton St. Madison WI 53706 608-262-2368 ofc. 608-262-0693 fax http://www.geology.wisc.edu. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: Roger Embree <rae1(at)planeteer.com>
Subject: Re: HS and Wing Jig
writes: > I am about to get started on my HS for my 6A and would like to > get the opinion of the group regarding the importance of jigs that are > as straight as an arrow and are dimensionally stable My solution was to build up a horizontal beam from several laminations of 3/4" thick plywood. I ripped up a sheet of plywood on my tablesaw to what I felt would be an appropriate width. Fortunately I have a couple of 12" I beams that are 9' long. I placed one beam on the floor, then the plywood layers glued together on top of it, and then put the second I beam on the top. I used every clamp and every weight that would fit on top to press the whole works together. The ends of the crossmember are mounted on angles and connected to the verticals of the jig with turnbuckles. The turnbuckles allow me to level both ends and take out any twist. This might seem like quite a bit of work but I am happy with it. Roger Embree 6A waiting for wings Alliston, Ont. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Btinn(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 23, 1997
Subject: Re: New Builder and Questions
Isn't there some maximum time limit between the time you apply for an N-number and the time you actually complete your plane ? I was of the understanding that anything over a year and you either had to reapply or send them another ten bucks or so to reserve it for another year. For you speed builders this is no problem, but is is for people like me. Bob Tinnell RV-6A wings ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: Greg Puckett <rv8er(at)concentric.net>
Subject: Re: airman knowledge
aol.com!QFA1(at)matronics.com wrote: > > This must have been originally posted by a furiner. As a CFI, I can't > > possibly recall the meaning of DVA !??!! > > +-- > --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at > http://www.matronics.com | > | > --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email > "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or > subject. | > +-- > --+ I found this in a ATC glossary. DIVERSE VECTOR AREA--In a radar environment, that area in which a prescribed departure route is not required as the only suitable route to avoid obstacles. The area in which random radar vectors below the MVA/MIA, established in accordance with the TERPS criteria for diverse departures, obstacles and terrain avoidance, may be issued to departing aircraft. Greg Puckett RV8-80081 rv8er(at)concentric.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Austin Tinckler" <tinckler(at)axionet.com>
Subject: Re: HS and Wing Jig
Date: Jul 23, 1997
---------- > > I am about to get started on my HS for my 6A and would like to > >get the opinion of the group regarding the importance of jigs that are > as > >straight as an arrow and are dimensionally stable< > Try this - Go into Home Depot (or any other lumber yard for that matter) Try cutting a couple sheets of plywood into 8 inch wide strips and then either screw two layers together or one layer ply and one layer of board (Van's packing box pine) for length and strength and you will get a frame that will not distort. Best is kiln dried lumber, dressed, but costs like crazy and not easy to find. As Van says, a jig need not be true as long as it is firm and your longerons and structure are checked, trued, and clamped. It works. In some parts of the country, good,true lumber is impossible to find, so you improvise. Beats the hell out of me why a steel structure welded, bolted and whatever is built to do this job.................JMHO..........Austin. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: Al Mojzisik <prober(at)iwaynet.net>
Subject: Re: HS and Wing Jig
ri.net> >above constructed jig is worth the effort, and if it is, whether other >builders would be interested in being able to get such a jig. Please >understand that I am not selling anything yet. Just testing the water >to see if it is something that other RV'ers would see an advange in >using. Last thing I want to do is get flamed here! Jeff Orear > jorear(at)mari.net Jeff, If you do market it I would suggest that you have Gary VanRemortel write your advertising copy....... :-) Al ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: Scott Gesele <scottg(at)icsnet.com>
Subject: Re: register intent to build?
>Intent to build???? Geeze, what will they think of next..a tax on my >dreams? I just gotta laugh my empannage off over THIS one... > >Brian Denk >RV-8...skinning stabilizer > Brian, Don't laugh. In my area (Farmingdale, NY MIDO), it was recommended that I let the FAA know about my intentions to build. They were very helpful and send me a bunch of paperwork regarding the registration and inspection procedures. They also put my name and project in a file. Once I'm ready for the airworthiness inspection (soon, very soon), they will already have the project on record. By letting the FAA know about the project from the start, it can only help with proving that you are the actual builder. As almost everybody knows, policy differs from region to region with the FAA. By playing by their rules, the paperwork and inspections will go that much easier. Just my $.02. Scott Gesele N506RV (Final assembly, final painting) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: steve(at)barnardaircraft.com (barnardaircraft)
Subject: Re: flying high
Dave I have flown this year using oxygen in my RV-6A with good results. If you turbocharge the engine it will add some weight but the performance will go up considerably at altitudes. You will not be able to use electronic ignition which advances the timing for lower manifold pressure, which will not occur with a turbocharged engine, turbo normalized or otherwise. It's a feasible change but the cowling is very tight so you'll have a lot to modify in the exhaust system. I have a performance program to determine speeds with different power and different altitudes and is already set up for the RV-6A parameters. If you would like this info I'd be glad to help you. The RV-6 does rather well at altitude even 15,000 ft with that short stubby wing which is surprising with such a low aspect ratio. A larger aspect ratio at altitude actually increases the speed of the airplane. Good luck. > >Thanks alot for the comments on speed mods. I've got another question >for you guys. How much of a headache would it be to set on rv6a up for >higher flying (15 to 25,000). >Has anyone had experience or know of someone who has put a turbo in an >rv? Also on using oxygen. What's a good book on these subjects? >Is it dueable?? >comments appreciated > >Dave-soon to be rv6a quickbuilder Respectfully, Steve Barnard Barnard Aircraft Components RV-6A N157ST 1000 hrs flying steve(at)barnardaircraft.com http://www.barnardaircraft.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: kevin lane <n3773(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: R&L mags
Date: Jul 23, 1997
I was timing my mags and following the procedure posted by Blair Tyson. He says that the "R" & "L" alignment holes on Slick mags indicate right and left, as in their postion when mounted on the engine. Walt Ruppert disgustingly told me it indicates right or left rotation of the mag and that both mags on the O-320 rotate left and can be mounted on either side. I am not trying to point fingers, just helping someone else avoid this conflict. Please tell me if I'm wrong about the timing. My 4300 series mag has both a R&L hole for internal timing located on different diameters. Otherwise all of Blair's procedures seemed correct. kevin 6A ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: halk(at)sybase.com (Hal Kempthorne)
Subject: Re: flying high
G'd morning RV'ers! Dave wrote: >How much of a headache would it be to set on rv6a up for flying (15 to 25,000) >Has anyone had experience or know of someone who has put a turbo in an > rv? >Also on using oxygen. What's a good book on these subjects? There is really nothing special about higher altitudes, at least not 15,000 to 17,999. At 18,000 you set your altimeter differently and you must be on an IFR flight plan. At 24,000 you need to have DME. I almost always fly my Deb above 10,000 and 14,000 when I can do it. It does take more power and time to get there. I heard that Bud Crower is putting a Corvette engine (350 hp +) in an RV. That should get him up there. You don't take off full power but rather keep pushing throttle in as you go up. Just keep it at say 180 hp all the way up. Ask Bob Nuckolls about electric problems at higher altitudes - there can be some. When you buy your oxygen outfit, you get bottle, cannulas, valves and controls. A very simplistic instruction set comes with it. Mainly it is "here are the settings for the different altitudes". My wife likes to make it richer and there is no harm in that. Above 18,000 you need to have a mask. At higher altitudes there is less weather and more time/distance to do something if mechanical things go potty. If I put a Mazda rotary in my RV-6, I think it would be the later year turbo. Hal Kempthorne RV-6AQ -- On main gear - panel stuff halk(at)sybase.com Santa Clara, CA. Debonair N6134V @ SJC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: Jay Humbard <jhumb(at)apexcorp.com>
Subject: Re: Nose wheel shimmy
aol.com!Btinn(at)matronics.com wrote: > > > I wouldn't be too concerned about the nose wheel shimmy on your 6A. It will likely be no problem for you. My builder friends seem to have no problem with it and I have been flying a Grumman Cheetah for several years with a similar arrangement with no shimmy problem at all. I owned a Cheetah for about 8 years, and had a persistent nose wheel shimmy problem, in spite of a great deal of head scratching by my A&P. I finally took it to a Cheetah expert, who laughed and said that the shimmy was caused by a poorly balanced nose wheel. He balanced the tire/wheel assembly, and the shimmy disappeared forever! Quite likely this is the problem being experienced by the RV builder... Jay Humbard ________________________________________________________________________________
From: winterland(at)rkymtnhi.com
Date: Jul 23, 1997
Subject: 16 Years of the RV-Ator book
For anybody interested in obtaining the 16 YEARS OF THE RV-ATOR book: Please note that our internet address has changed. The new address is the one from which this post has been sent. (winterland(at)rkymtnhi.com) The old (@theharddrive) address in no longer valid. For those new to the list, the 16 YEARS OF THE RV-ATOR book is an authorized 300 page compilation of all technical and builder assistance articles which have previously appeared in old issues of the RV-Ator from 1980-December '95. All photos and drawings have been preserved and all articles have been reorganized and presented in the order in which you build the plane. Chapter headings: Tools Tail Wings Fuselage Finishing kits Engines Props Panel Options Safety & Maintenance Performance Flying The price of the book is $27.95 and can be ordered directly from us, from Vans, Avery Tools, and Aircraft Spruce. Andy Gold RV-6A N-5060 (flying) Winterland Publications PO Box 270 Tabernash, CO 80478 970 887-2207 fax 970 887-2197 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: winterland(at)rkymtnhi.com
Date: Jul 23, 1997
Subject: RV maintenance manual?
I remember hearing somewhere about a person who has written and published an RV maintenance manual. Does anybody know anything about this or where I can buy a copy? Andy RV 6A N-5060 8.5 hrs TT ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 24, 1997
From: "L. Coats" <lcoats(at)wave.co.nz>
Subject: Re: airman knowledge
>dimensional.com!mikel(at)matronics.com wrote: >> >This must have been originally posted by a furiner. As a CFI, I can't >> >possibly recall the meaning of DVA !??!! >> Thank HEAVENS.......I thought it was just me.........> >It was posted by Louise Coats, a fellow Kiwi. I've never heard the term >either, but didn't want seem an iggerant furriner. I guess it must be a >wimmin thing. :-) >Frank --+ Drill of vital action! :-) I obviously trained at a different flight school compared to the rest of the world! This is typical of the aviation scene - so many abbreviations and no body knows what they mean!!!!!!! L. Coats ZK-RVL RV6 flying :-) 196.2hr ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: halk(at)sybase.com (Hal Kempthorne)
Subject: Re: HS and Wing Jig LUMBER STUFF
My name is Hal Kempthorne, I come from Washington, I worked in the lumberyards there... Mostly I worked, for six long years, as consultant in manufacturing processes and methods in a plant that made very high quality wood 'stile and rail' doors - the non-flush type. They bought high quality douglas fir (mostly) and kiln dried it in their own 7 or 8 multi-boxcar sized kilns which were steam heated by thier very large steam plant. They would not have been able to deal with the LOW precision you need for your jigs - which are actually properly called 'fixtures'. Jigs hold and position tools, not parts. Select wood with few or small defects - knots etc. Select wood that is thoroughly dried. Kiln drying is fast but air drying, if done fully, is really better. The best thing would be old wood from a wrecked house in your area so that it is very dry and at the humidity where it will be used. Now, the way you shape it will be how it remains. It is stable. Plywood is very dry as manufactured and, lacking used lumber is what I would use. Hal Kempthorne RV-6AQ -- On main gear - panel stuff halk(at)sybase.com Santa Clara, CA. Debonair N6134V @ SJC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: Dennis Jackson <denny(at)transport.com>
Subject: Re: register intent to build?
Joe Larson wrote: > ...... > And yes, the FAA tells the states that you've registered an N-number. > Governments being governments, they happily say, "Oh goody. Another > airplane to tax." Some states are more stupid than others and don't > understand it's not an airplane yet. So yes, some states will try to > tax you for your N-number. I don't know if they actually succeed. > "I tell you what -- you come point out my airplane to me, and I'll > happily pay your tax bill" sounds like a good argument. > Only to a reasonable person. More likely the scenario will go something like this: You: "I tell you what -- you come point out my airplane to me, and I'll happily pay your tax bill." Gov: "Our records show that you have failed to pay the required taxes on you aircraft. Please remit the above amount." You: "Show me the airplane!" Gov: "Unless the full amount shown above is recieved by xx date we will be forced to take action." You: "SHOW ME THE AIRPLANE!" Gov: "Notice is herewith given that your bank and employer have been notified to withhold all due amounts heretofore requested by this agency." You: "!@#$*&$%$#@!" Actually I had a case like this. I bought my tail kit from a friend who started it and decided it was more than he could handle, but not before he got all excited and rushed out and got his very own N number. I had to tell the state of Oregon every year (or was it every other year?) that the airplane was just airplane parts and therefore exempt. Kind of a hassle but nothing compared to what I had to go to to get the number changed to the one I wanted to use. (Another story, another day.) DJ RV-4 N296DJ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Chris Hinch <chris(at)dcc.govt.nz>
Subject: Re: airman knowledge
Date: Jul 24, 1997
Hi Frank and RVList Having just received my info pack from the New Zealand CAA, the "Intent to Build" form is the first thing that I need to complete and return before I order any kit from Van's. It's not too officious, and appears to be a professional courtesy to the department, so that they can help out along the way (my interpretation, not their's). Certainly the info kit that they have provided is a very good piece of work - I don't mind my tax dollars going towards that - I learnt a great deal. The ITB isn't binding in any way, and doesn't form the basis of any tax. As I understand it, New Zealand is one of the least regulated, officiated, and bureacratic airspaces in the world in which to fly (as well as some of the prettiest scenery *grin*) so I'm quite happy to help the CAA help me build my plane! Sorry if this all sounds terribly naiive. Re DVA - "Departure Vital Actions"? Chris Hinch chris(at)dcc.govt.nz RV-8 builder to be ---------- > From: owner-rv-list > To: RV List > Subject: Re: RV-List: airman knowledge > Date: Wednesday, 23 July 1997 10:13PM > > > dimensional.com!mikel(at)matronics.com wrote: > > > > > > >This must have been originally posted by a furiner. As a CFI, I can't > > >possibly recall the meaning of DVA !??!! > > > > Thank HEAVENS.......I thought it was just me......... > > It was posted by Louise Coats, a fellow Kiwi. I've never heard the term > either, but didn't want seem an iggerant furriner. I guess it must be a > wimmin thing. :-) > > Frank. > > > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > +-- --+ > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Btinn(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 23, 1997
Subject: Re: HS and Wing Jig
I am about finished with my jig that has been standing in my garage for over two years. I carefully selected straight dry fir 4x4 timbers and sanded them smooth before I mounted them to the ceiling, floor and each other. I have had no problem with warping or rigidity and am perfectly happy with them. I wouldn't go to the extra expense of using laminated beams unless I couldn't get dry wood. They would be nice to have and may be necessary in some climates, but we have a good deal of variation in humidity here in Western Oregon and I have had zero problem with my jig. I don't want to throw cold water on any possible enterprise but unless the price can be made competitive with regular straight lumber I would rather use my money for airplane parts than for a pretty jig. Good luck to you in your endeavors. Bob Tinnell Salem, OR RV-6A wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ron Mowrer" <ronmow(at)rkymtn.com>
Subject: Rocky Mountain Instrument Update Notice
Date: Jul 23, 1997
To RV owners with Rocky Mountain Instrument Products... Our latest update notice will be mailed to all our customers shortly. RV-listers can get an advance copy at our website below. The last link on the home page will take you to our new "Update & Notices for Current Customers" page. The update notice is available in both Adobe .pdf and WordPerfect.wpd formats for download and printing. The first item in the update notice is about the new reset assembly for the microEncoder that was discussed in the RV list about a month ago. It is now available at no charge and you can e-mail your request to techsupport(at)rkymtn.com. Please read the entire notice before ordering as there are a number of new items and upgrades available for both our instruments. The update notice also details information on our new compass module that feeds magnetic heading to the microEncoder for display and/or inclusion in the serial output to a GPS or computer. Regards, Ron Mowrer /^\ /\/ \ Rocky Mountain Instrument / RMI \ http://rkymtn.com (307) 864-9300 (vox/fax) -------------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: steve(at)barnardaircraft.com (barnardaircraft)
Subject: New Nose Wheel Shimmy
The following is a summary of comments on nose wheel shimmy on the RV-6A, with an objective summary at the conclusion. Gets kind of funny sometimes. Andy Gold: After about a dozen landings in my new RV-6A, I'm having a problem which has developed on my last 2 flights. On landing as soon as the nose wheel touches down and the until the speed gets below 30 ish there is a tremendous vibration and the nose wheel feels like it is about to rip itself off. Help. Russ: I have adjusted it 3 times in 150 hours and it seems to be getting finiker all the time. Even after the most recent adjustment it would still have a mild shimmy. I don't know how much one can tighten it up without causing some other problem. My nosewheel fairing and gear leg fairing suffered damage during one earlier incident. George Orndorff: On both of my RV-6A's I had the same trouble with the nose wheel. I think its just break-in wear on the shimmy washers. I only know of two reasons for nose wheel shimmy. 1 is that the shimmy dampener is loose or installed wrong. The second reason is allowing the nose wheel to touch down at too fast of speed. Les Williams: I never experienced nose wheel shimmy in 350 hours and never had to re-adjust the breakout pressure on my RV-6A. Steve, I wouldn't get the idea that "nose wheel shimmy" is a common problem on the RV-6A. I would guess that anyone with a recurring problem has either a bad assembly or incorrect adjustment of the parts I mention in my earlier post. Ken Hitchmough: I had a similar problem after about 10 landings and tightened the nut up to a few pounds of pull above what is recommended. Interestingly enough, thats what we had to do on the Air Beetle also. Obviously, keeping the weight of the wheel up on landing helps too and I progressively pull back on the stick until I'm practically stopped. Jim Cone: This nose wheel shimmy is a result of the bearings and other parts getting settled in. As the roughness is reduced by wear, there is less friction and therefore the nose wheel can shimmy. Just tighten the bolt on the bottom of the nose gear to achieve the desired side pressure again and your problem will be solved. I ruined my steering stop with a nose gear shimmy after about 10 landings because I didn't recheck the side force required to turn the wheel. I now do this more often and have not had a repeat of the problem. Summary by Steve Barnard I can't resist, I just have to play Andy Rooney from CBS here folks Les your my first target, you specifically said you never experienced any nose wheel shimmy or never had to readjust it. You have lots of input but no experience--your out. Mt Everest awaits your ascent but please go with an experienced guide. Oh by the way shimmy is common to the RV-6A. That nose wheel aint idiot proof. George your more thoughtful but said there were only 2 problems when you listed 3. Also you can get wheel shimmy on that nose at any speed. I've seen it physically on airplanes landing down to around 5 mph. Landing slightly sideways will induce shimmy on rough runways at high speeds. Andy your cool, you brought up the initial problem for help. Russ, sorry to hear about the damage, but read on for the real info your looking for. Ken and Jim your on the right track. Your almost there. The following is based on actual experience, observation, engineering background and numerous landings. The shimmy we are experiencing is directly related to coefficient of friction. In this case it is the grease we are applying. If you torque the nosewheel to a pull out force of 22 lbs. with no grease on any washers or upper stop plate your okay. Once grease gets on either end of these areas your coefficient of friction is greatly diminished. Your torque has'nt changed but the ease of movement once moved from a stable position is greatly enhanced. The best analogy is drive on tar roads and do a panic stop. Short distance. But repeat that test on ice and you slide with ease. You have the same clamp up torque on the brakes but the contact surface has changed. This explains the finicky issue that Russ was trying to convey. I had very few problems with the nose wheel shimmy issue until about 500 hours. This problem has surfaced several more times since then, up to over 1050 flight hours. We had been using a thick grease to lube the nose wheel fork. One day we ran out of that particular grease and picked up some automotive type. We did condition inspections on 2 RV-6A's the same day using the new grease with the specified torque. We both went flying the next day and both had problems with shimmy. What appears to be happening is a catch 22. If you torque the fork to specs and then using the grease zerk filling the fork full the grease will be forced down the fork and up the fork squishing out at both ends. The bellville washers will then become lubricated and voila you loose or diminish dampening capability. We immediately thought the washers were at fault and replaced 4 of them. No change. We them cleaned out all the grease, used a marine grade grease which is thicker in viscosity and did not pump the fork full of grease. The problem went away instantly. Those large bronze shoulder bushings wear very little because of a small amount of rotation that takes place during taxing. Nor does the cupped washers seem to have any wear. It's when the grease gets on the washers and lubricates them. When the airplane is new the cofficient of friction on the washers will change somewhat due to smoothing of the surfaces. Check the grease your using and use very little. Check the torque several times when it's new and maybe once every 6 months or as required. Good luck P.S. The bronze bushings need an o-ring top and bottom to contain grease inside the fork. If the problem here is not addressed accurately it will remain an issue here on the RV list forever. Mark my words. Respectfully, Steve Barnard Barnard Aircraft Components RV-6A N157ST 1000 hrs flying steve(at)barnardaircraft.com http://www.barnardaircraft.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: n5lp(at)carlsbad.net (Larry Pardue)
Subject: Re: HS and Wing Jig
> > >Hello All! > > I am about to get started on my HS for my 6A and would like to get >the opinion of the group regarding the importance of jigs that are as >straight as an arrow and are dimensionally stable. I have at my With a prepunched HS skin, just try to build the HS crooked. I think the only reason for a jig with the prepunched is to have a convenient thing to hold the assembly. Larry Pardue RV-6Q Wing Skin ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 23, 1997
From: Al Mojzisik <prober(at)iwaynet.net>
Subject: Speed With Economy # diconnected
RV-List message posted by: >RBusick505(at)aol.com >> >In Kent Paser's book "Speed with Economy" he lists all kinds of ways >> that an RV type A/C can improve the top end speed without adding more >>HP. Great book. >> >> You can order direct from: >> Paser Publications >> 5672 West Chestnut Ave >> Littleton, Colorado 80123 >> >> Price 24.95 plus 3.5 shipping >> >> Phone 303 979-3666 I tried this phone number twice and they said it's disconnected with no more info. Al ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ken_Hitchmough(at)magic.ca (Ken Hitchmough)
Date: Jul 23, 1997
Subject: Fwd: Heat shielding fuel lines.
I'm sending this again because it didn't seem to get through (ie, I didn't get it back from the list)...... I thought I'd let the list know about something I've recently tried on my fuel injected 360 in my '6A.... I'd been having a problem with the engine surging after it had heat soaked on a hot day. It only happened at idle/taxi and was ok when power was applied. Nevertheless it was quite disconcerting and I made several attempts to cure the problem by re routing fuel lines etc. I have no return path to the tank for fuel vapours which would probably have cured the problem quite easily. My next attempt was going to be relocating the gascolator from the engine compartment to the wing route to keep the fuel cool. (I may still do this). However I read somewhere about a tape that is used in race cars around the fuel lines as they seem to have similar problems that we do. My local hardware store had a roll of insulating tape with a shiny metal side and a sticky foam side about 2 inches wide. I stuck piece on my heat muff for a couple of months to see how it would behave in the heat. I also tried to set fire to it with a blowtorch. Both tests showed it was fire resistant and it did not decay or harden while on the heat muff. So...I proceeded to wrap my long fuel lines (which are already firesleeved) with the stuff. The result has been significant so far. I still get very minor surging but nowhere near as bad as I used to. I don't think this is a substitute for having a return line, so one day I MAY put one in but it has most certainly helped me. I believe firesleeve is to protect against flame. I think its protection against radiant heat is probably minimal so the shiny metal surface on the tape acts like a very long heat shield. At this stage I don't know if there will be any long term effects on the tape...only time will tell. Ken RV6A Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 24, 1997
From: "les williams" <lesliebwilliams(at)msn.com>
Subject: primer on the fuel tank ribs
FWIW, there are some primers, like the BMS-10-11 made by Sikkens, that is impervious to any solvent I've tried. Even aircraft grade paint remover doesn't soften it very well. Les Williams/RV-6AQ ---------- From: owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com on behalf of Leo Davies Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 1997 9:11 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: primer on the fuel tank ribs >>While priming the ribs, we also primed the ribs for the fuel tank. Can >>anyone tell us : >>(a) must we ensure the removal of the primer ? What is the reason ? >> >>(b) any particular method of primer removal so as not to leave any >>detrimental effect ? >You do not want fuel to slowly dissolve your primer and be contaminated. >If you can't get it off using a solvent or some other relatively easy >method, why not just buy a new set from Van's? MEK (Methyl Ethyl Ketone) will remove primer nicely. Be careful with it, highly flammable and moderately toxic (wear an organic vapour filter in your respirator). Leo Davies ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 24, 1997
From: "les williams" <lesliebwilliams(at)msn.com>
Subject: Canopy
Denny, mine is about the same and pictures of my first plane appears to be at least that and it was fitted with the old canopy. I don't think the new canopy will fit differently there. The factory prototype RV-6A was refitted with the new canopy with no problems, according to an article in the RVator. I would stick with the plans. ---------- From: owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com on behalf of Denny Harjehausen Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 1997 7:05 PM Subject: RV-List: Canopy I've got a question on the height of roll bar. I have checked the height via a projected line up the fuselage formers and it appears as the roll bar is about a inch and a quarter above this projected line. Looking at many past gathering photos I have taken the roll bar looks too high in comparison. The roll bar measures the correct according to the plans. Was this height increased with the new one canopy fits the tip and slide? Is this a trim to suit? Thanks! Have a Great Day! Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH Fuselage-top side Lebanon, OR ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Persyk" <dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Brake Pedal Angle
Date: Jul 23, 1997
I just assembled the brake pedals (overhead) on the pilot side and I find that the left pedal tilts toward the firewall about 5 degrees from the plane of the rudder pedal frame. On the right the pedal tilts aft about 5 degrees away from the firewall. This will cause me to pull my toes back towards me on the right to avoid inadvertently depressing the brakes. Justice warns about this in his procedure. Did any of you guys flying find this to be a problem? In the two 6As I've flown it didn't seem to be a problem but I really haven't done much braking, and I don't recall which style rudder pedals they had. Comments appreciated. Dennis 6A fuselage in jig ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 24, 1997
From: George McNutt <GMcNutt(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: Re: flying high
>Has anyone had experience or know of someone who has put a turbo in an = >rv? Also on using oxygen. What's a good book on these subjects? Hi Dave No experience with a turbo on a RV-6, but 10 years ago I bought a project= Mooney M20-B and finished the installation of a Ray-Jay Turbo Normalized STC on that Lycoming 0-360 powered aircraft. (Turbo normalized means that= you never draw more than the normal rated power so engine life remains th= e same). No boosting above 28.5 inches manifold pressure, just brings it ba= ck up to "normal" when you crank up the Turbo in climb or at altitude. = There are drawbacks to a turbocharged engine including a lot of heat unde= r the cowling, extra complexity such as oil lines to the turbo bearings, he= at shields, modified carburettors and fuel pumps etc. = As for books, borrow owners manuals for a turbo and non-turbo Cessna 210.= Calculate the fuel burns, times, advantages (if any) on the trips you wou= ld typically fly, factor in head and tail wind conditions increasing with altitude. = You could theroretically go 220+ Kts at 23,000 ft in a Turbo RV-6 and tha= t sounds great but going west you will have greater headwinds at altitude, = be above the freezing level year round (ice), spend more time and fuel in climb etc, etc. = To gain any practical advantage over a comparable non turbo aircraft, you= would have to be consistantly flying long legs (250 + N.M.). = When the Ray-Jay spun up it had a really neat sound, but the M20B was my first and last Turbo! = George McNutt 6A Elevators. = ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JRWillJR(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 24, 1997
Subject: Re: repairman's certificate/insurance
The FAA often makes policy by omission. I have been unable to locate any reg. that states an aircraft owner can do anything but prevetive maintenance. A homebuilt is a registered aircraft and like any aircraft a potential hazard if not maintained properly. When a homebuilt is sold there is no reason to believe that new owner should be thought to have any more knowledge of his new second hand h/b than the owner of a store bought,.Why should the FAA allow someone who may not even be able to build a bird house do his/her own maintenance, carry passengers and operate the aircraft on Federal airways. Let a person purchase a used homebuilt and then get insurance on the expensive new toy. Let them do their own mechanic work and then let an accident happen where faulty or inadequate maintenace is blamed and watch the insurance company forget they ever heard of them. Tell them " a man at the FAA " said it was okay. Then tell the FAA they said it was okay, then let them tell the lawyers of the passengers widower that it is all okay. Thin ice at best. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Btinn(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 24, 1997
Subject: Re: HS and Wing Jig
That swivel riveting head from Avery (or others) will certainly save a lot of small smiles on the skin of your airplane. I would place that one at the top of the list of tools needed, especially by someone trying to do their own rivet bucking, if you want a good looking job. The large mushroom head bucking bar for back riveting the skins is another tool well worth considering. Try borrowing these from another builder for a trial run on some scrap aluminum and compare your results with those you get using the fixed rivet head and regular bucking bars. Unless you are a very experienced riveter I suspect you will find the results quite convincing. Remember also that in order to rivet those large sections of skin there will be times when you must hold the gun and bucking bar at nearly arms length making it very difficult to assure that they are perfectly perpendicular to the surface. The swivel head gives you much more room for error before you begin having a problem with your finished rivets. Bob Tinnell Salem, OR RV-6A wings ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 24, 1997
From: "Scott A. Jordan" <SAJ_SLJ(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: Re: New Builder and Questions
N number reservations must be renewed annually ($10). Personnaly, I won'= t wait for a notice from the FAA, I'll mail in my money 1 - 2 months before= expiration. Scott A. Jordan 80331 N733JJ Finishing rudder today ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 24, 1997
From: Don McNamara <mcnamara(at)sbt.infi.net>
Subject: Re: R-410 fit
Scott A. Jordan wrote: > The plans for the RV-8 show the R-410 bracket being riveted with three > CS-4-6 rivets to the rudder skin and the flange of the R-404 rib. When I > fit the R-410 (which is pre-bent by Vans) in place the sides do not come up > flush with the rib flanges, leaving a gap between the parts. If I simply > bend the sides out they will meet the flange but not be flush against it. > > I have thought of two "fixes". I could simple rivet one side then pry it > over to rivet the second before riveting the 410's tabs to teh rib and > rudder horn. I wonder if this won't creat stresses I don't want. The > second fix would be to put another bend in the sides and create tabs that > will be flush on the flanges but I wonder if this will weaken the > structure. > > Any suggestions would be appreciated. > > Thanks > > Scott A. Jordan > 80331 > N733JJ Scott-- If your part had lines drawn on it, and you trimmed to the lines, the part probably didn't fit quite right. I had that problem, tried a fix, decided against it, made a paper template, ordered a new R-410, wiped off the blue lines, drew my own, cut it out, it fit fine. Just make a new one. --Don McNamara #80113 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 24, 1997
From: Denny Harjehausen <retflygtiger(at)proaxis.com>
Subject: Canopy
>Denny, mine is about the same and pictures of my first plane appears to be at >least that and it was fitted with the old canopy. I don't think the new >canopy will fit differently there. The factory prototype RV-6A was refitted >with the new canopy with no problems, according to an article in the RVator. >I would stick with the plans. > Thanks Les, I do recall that they fit the prototype with the new one, now that you mention it. I was trying to find the pictures last night. Trimming the bottom of the roll bar at the required angle will lower it some I guess and it looks like the skirt makes it appear lower on the finished product. It looked to me like it was going to be a bubble canopy when I first located the roll bar. As I am short in stature and not a gun fighter...well I was thinking drag (?) and sleek appearance. Some -6 side views the canopy look lower than others to me, maybe it is the paint job (?). Thought I'd ask to be sure. Thanks again! Have a Great Day! Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH Fuselage-top side Lebanon, OR ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 24, 1997
From: Gene Gottschalk <geneg(at)rattler.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Intent to Build
All, I haven't had time to search for the "Intent to Build" source document, but I'll include a little background on why I completed this task early in my construction process. This goes back to how do you get an "N" number question posted earlier. This year at the EAA Chapter 524 RV Forum I approached Bobby Thomas, a local banker who spoke at the forum, noted for his support of institutional financing for experimental aircraft projects. His bank will not make a loan, or in my case a credit line, available unless the project is registered and insured. Since the interest rate of his loan is lower than my Visa card I am considering this as an alternative. So that the registration process will not impact my construction, I decided to complete it before I needed to purchase my engine or avionics. So, I followed the FAA provided flow chart to complete this paperwork. To register I needed to provide an "N" number. I a matter of about one month I applied for and received a reserved "N" number and registered my RV-6A. I also acquired builder's insurance since I'm now concerned for the investment in my project and it was required to secure the credit line. BTW, I haven't heard anything from the tax man yet, but I wanted to get that out of the way also so I don't have to pay a bundle at the last minute. I'll try to dig out the source of the "intent to Build" information. I was under the impression this was required by the FAA, but it may have only been a suggestion. At any rate, it was a good thing for me to do as the FAA provided a detailed process for getting the paperwork done the way they wanted it. And, I only had to submit it once. -Gene Gottschalk RV-6A, N700RV, Registered, but not flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Bumflyer(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 24, 1997
Subject: Re: New Nose Wheel Shimmy
Steve, you missed your calling. What an excellent treatment on nose wheel shimmy. I have been entertained, educated, and best of all I know what to do. Hopefully your humor did not discourage any of our more casual contributors. I don't shimmy much but then I don't lubricate much either. D Walsh. RV-6A, 40 hours. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 24, 1997
From: "les williams" <lesliebwilliams(at)msn.com>
Subject: Brake Pedal Angle
When fitting mine a few weeks ago I had the same result. I don't know what effect it has in operation, but I didn't like it. My first assembly also tilted sideways because I drilled the side pieces per plan and then found that the welded mounting tab holes were out of horizontal alignment. My fix for both was to locate the master cylinder mounting hole in the bottom of the side plate about 1/16" down and 1/16" toward the rear of the plane from where it was. A little correction here results in a significant change in tilt angle. Les Williams/RV-6AQ ---------- From: owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com on behalf of Dennis Persyk Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 1997 9:52 PM Subject: RV-List: Brake Pedal Angle I just assembled the brake pedals (overhead) on the pilot side and I find that the left pedal tilts toward the firewall about 5 degrees from the plane of the rudder pedal frame. On the right the pedal tilts aft about 5 degrees away from the firewall. This will cause me to pull my toes back towards me on the right to avoid inadvertently depressing the brakes. Justice warns about this in his procedure. Did any of you guys flying find this to be a problem? In the two 6As I've flown it didn't seem to be a problem but I really haven't done much braking, and I don't recall which style rudder pedals they had. Comments appreciated. Dennis 6A fuselage in jig ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 24, 1997
From: Mike Wills <willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil>
Subject: Re: New Nose Wheel Shimmy
I was paging through my 16 years of RVator last night and ironically (since Andy Gold started this thread) found reference to this problem. Solution was to balance the wheel pant. Dont know if this is a cure but it couldnt hurt. Its probably worth a look. Mike Wills RV-4 (wings) willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil >Andy Gold: >After about a dozen landings in my new RV-6A, I'm having a problem which >has developed on my last 2 flights. On landing as soon as the nose wheel >touches down and the until the speed gets below 30 ish there is a >tremendous vibration and the nose wheel feels like it is about to rip >itself off. Help. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 24, 1997
From: Robert Van Zant <rvanzant(at)van.inc.net>
Subject: Speed With Economy # diconnected
>> In Kent Paser's book "Speed with Economy" he lists all kinds of ways >> that an RV type A/C can improve the top end speed without adding more >> HP. Great book. >> >> You can order direct from: >> Paser Publications >> 5672 West Chestnut Ave >> Littleton, Colorado 80123 >> >> Price 24.95 plus 3.5 shipping >> >> Phone 303 979-3666 > > I tried this phone number twice and they said it's disconnected with no > more info. Al The number I recently reached him at is 303-904-3417. bob P.S. Anyone ever formed their own canopy? I'm toying with the idea, and would like to talk to anyone who's actually done it. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Tedd McHenry <tedd(at)idacom.hp.com>
Subject: Re: HS and Wing Jig LUMBER STUFF
Date: Jul 24, 1997
Hal Kempthorne writes: > > Mostly I worked, for six long years, as consultant in manufacturing processes > and methods in a plant that made very high quality wood 'stile and rail' doors - > the non-flush type. --snip-- Hal, I was thinking of using Parallam, an engineered wood product, for my wing jig (fixture). Here's a description from a supplier's web page (http://www.hollyburn.com/parallam.html)... "Parallam(R) PSL is made from long, thin strands of wood bonded together in a patented microwave curing process." This stuff is very straight, and I'm told it's very stable (not prone to warping). Are you familiar with this material? Would it make a good wing jug (fixture)? Tedd McHenry tedd(at)idacom.hp.com Surrey, BC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mikel(at)dimensional.com
Date: Jul 24, 1997
Subject: Re: Incident almost accident
>Has anyone ever devised a warning system to advise the pilot of a RV if the >canopy latches are not secure? My RV-4 has a simple microswitch mounted so the latching rod tuches it and opens the circut when the canopy is secured (i.e., on when the canopy is open). The circut lights a 1/2" panel light RED which is located right above and to the left of the airspeed indicator (what you probably look at most when taking off). The light is also partially hidden by the canopy frame when the canopy is closed. Also works as a master-switch-still-on light. Michael ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JRoss10612(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 24, 1997
Subject: Re: Landing Light Installation
Jim: I mounted the Duckworks landing light (just one) in the outboard bay of the left wing. The relector is inserted from the front, into the rectangular hole in the mounting bracket. Two nutplates are riveted to the mounting bracket, two washers and screws are used to hold the reflector to the bracket. I know it sounds mickey mouse, but it works quite well. I removed the rubber from the reflector, and painted the mounting bracket and inside of the skins flat black. I also attached the lens mounting strips that hold the nutplates to the lens with two 3/32 countersunk "soft" rivets that were barely squezzed. I guess I thought the double sided tape was inadequate for holding the mounting strips. Hope this helps. Jon Ross RV-80094 - Wing tanks & proseal soon. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 24, 1997
From: Alan Carroll <carroll(at)geology.wisc.edu>
Subject: Re: Speed With Economy # diconnected
I think I've seen this book on sale at the Oshkosh museum bookstore - maybe order it from them? >>> >In Kent Paser's book "Speed with Economy" he lists all kinds of ways >>> that an RV type A/C can improve the top end speed without adding more >>>HP. Great book. >>> >>> You can order direct from: >>> Paser Publications >>> 5672 West Chestnut Ave >>> Littleton, Colorado 80123 >>> >>> Price 24.95 plus 3.5 shipping >>> >>> Phone 303 979-3666 > > >I tried this phone number twice and they said it's disconnected with no >more info. Al > > Alan Carroll RV-8 #80177 (Wings) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 24, 1997
From: Robert Acker <r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Seat hinge
>Rob: >I have also been looking into moving the rearmost seat attachment back >as I am 6'-6" tall with long legs...I built it such that the >cross member is 1 1/2 inches back. I had asked Van about this at >Arlington '96 and he thought this would be fine. So far everything >has worked out ok with the fuselage skins drilled, but not riveted. Doug, I'm 6'4" mostly torso. I had a chance to sit in W. Berry's gorgeous -6, he moved the F-605 cross member 3" back. What a difference in seating comfort compared to a standard -6, I finally fit perfectly in the airplane instead of being cramped up. Your mods sound great provided you are building the standard kit, I have the quickbuild so will only be unriveting the minimal items necessary. Rob Acker / r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com / RV-6Q ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 24, 1997
From: "les williams" <lesliebwilliams(at)msn.com>
Subject: Brake Pedal Angle
After reading my post I realize that I should have included moving the mounting hole in the side angle to correct the horizontal alignment. Les ---------- From: owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com on behalf of les williams Sent: Thursday, July 24, 1997 8:47 AM Subject: RE: RV-List: Brake Pedal Angle When fitting mine a few weeks ago I had the same result. I don't know what effect it has in operation, but I didn't like it. My first assembly also tilted sideways because I drilled the side pieces per plan and then found that the welded mounting tab holes were out of horizontal alignment. My fix for both was to locate the master cylinder mounting hole in the bottom of the side plate about 1/16" down and 1/16" toward the rear of the plane from where it was. A little correction here results in a significant change in tilt angle. Les Williams/RV-6AQ ---------- From: owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com on behalf of Dennis Persyk Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 1997 9:52 PM Subject: RV-List: Brake Pedal Angle I just assembled the brake pedals (overhead) on the pilot side and I find that the left pedal tilts toward the firewall about 5 degrees from the plane of the rudder pedal frame. On the right the pedal tilts aft about 5 degrees away from the firewall. This will cause me to pull my toes back towards me on the right to avoid inadvertently depressing the brakes. Justice warns about this in his procedure. Did any of you guys flying find this to be a problem? In the two 6As I've flown it didn't seem to be a problem but I really haven't done much braking, and I don't recall which style rudder pedals they had. Comments appreciated. Dennis 6A fuselage in jig ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 24, 1997
From: halk(at)sybase.com (Hal Kempthorne)
Subject: Re: HS and Wing Jig LUMBER STUFF
Tedd, This is overkill but if you can afford it...why not! hal I was thinking of using Parallam, an engineered wood product, for my wing jig (fixture). Here's a description from a supplier's web page (http://www.hollyburn.com/parallam.html)... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 24, 1997
From: steve(at)barnardaircraft.com (barnardaircraft)
Subject: Re: New Nose Wheel Shimmy
Hi Mike, Balancing the nose wheel would require a lot of lead in the nose piece of the wheel pant. There is no mass forward of the pivot point. In otherwords all the weight is aft of the axle. It is something to consider but from a weight standpoint you may add excess weight on the airplane. I also forgot to mention that most of us are probably using a $20.00 fish scale made in Taiwan which is probably not real accurate. I would bet most of us can't really get an accurate torque using what we are. Thanks for your input. >I was paging through my 16 years of RVator last night and ironically (since >Andy Gold started this thread) found reference to this problem. Solution was >to balance the wheel pant. Dont know if this is a cure but it couldnt hurt. >Its probably worth a look. > >Mike Wills >RV-4 (wings) >willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil > > >>Andy Gold: >>After about a dozen landings in my new RV-6A, I'm having a problem which >>has developed on my last 2 flights. On landing as soon as the nose wheel >>touches down and the until the speed gets below 30 ish there is a >>tremendous vibration and the nose wheel feels like it is about to rip >>itself off. Help. Respectfully, Steve Barnard Barnard Aircraft Components RV-6A N157ST 1000 hrs flying steve(at)barnardaircraft.com http://www.barnardaircraft.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: TESTPYLOT(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 24, 1997
Subject: Re: Brake Pedal Angle
Hi RVers I found the same problem with the rudder pedals. I am also 6'6" tall and the angle was hard to deal with. What I did is machined a pc. of nylon that I installed inside the master cylinders. It shortend the through a small amount but change the angle alot. It made a huge difference and is very comfortable now. The mod that Rob Acher was talking about (moving the seat-back support structure) aft he saw on my rv6. I had to narrow the seat-back aprox 6" from the bottom to alow for the seat belts. In doing this mod I soon realized that the instrument panel was to far from my face so I moved it back 3" as well. All of this is over the CG it so it shoundn't hurt my baggage caring capacity. (180 hp constant speed prop and bat. on the firewall) Werner Berry N64WL finishing up the paint and moving out to chino airport next week ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 25, 1997
From: Kam Yuk CHENG <kamy(at)cyllene.uwa.edu.au>
Subject: Can 4 people work on the fuselage construction ?
Dear all, The interest among my mechanical engineering students who want to work on the RV-6A construction is overwhelming. It would be very difficult to shortlist to 4 students working on the fuselage. Being a university project, I have to stick to the university semester times. Those 4 students will start on the fuselage next Feb., since they have their exams. in Oct. and then a long summer vacation break. Can anyone tell me if 4 people would be too many to work on the fuselage construction ? Regards Kamy University of Western Australia ________________________________________________________________________________
From: UFOBUCK(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 25, 1997
Subject: Re: RV maintenance manual?
I remember hearing somewhere about a person who has written and published an RV maintenance manual. Does anybody know anything about this or where I can buy a copy? >> Andy- One RV Aircraft Maintenance Manual is available from Aircraft Spruce or from C.R. Supply P.O. Box 46 Manitou Springs,CO 80829 $ 16.00. I'll be glad to send you mine , it's not a very satisfactory book. E-mail me your address but do it fast as I'm on my way to Oshkosh for my 18th year and I'm getting hyper. Regards. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Darby" <johnd@our-town.com>
Subject: Re: Can 4 people work on the fuselage construction ?
Date: Jul 25, 1997
John C Darby Jr. RV6 N61764 flying Stephenville TX ---------- > Can anyone tell me if 4 people would be too many to work on the fuselage > construction ? > Kamy > University of Western Australia > Kamy, Your problem is similar to organizing political party stuff--the more you can get to work on it, the better it is overall. I've had as many as six work on mine at one time. It takes a little organization and compatible people, but that way I was able to spread the interest over more fertile ground at on time. After all, I suspect that one of your main goals is to spread the reception of knowledge as wide and throrough as possible. Press on! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 25, 1997
Subject: Re: Fwd: Heat shielding fuel lines.
I had occasion to travel to PHX last week, and this proved to be a severe test of my abilities to start and keep a F.I. a/c engine running. The instructor I visited said to keep the boost pump running during the time I felt the engine would surge or quit. Hey! This fella seems to have a good tip here! I think I'll see if I can find some of that tape you're talking about. Do you have a brand name? Check six! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tim Lewis" <timrv6a(at)earthlink.net>
Date: Jul 25, 1997
Subject: Re: Brake Pedal Angle
> I just assembled the brake pedals (overhead) on the pilot side and I find > that the left pedal tilts toward the firewall about 5 degrees from the > plane of the rudder pedal frame. On the right the pedal tilts aft about 5 > degrees away from the firewall. This will cause me to pull my toes back > towards me on the right to avoid inadvertently depressing the brakes. > Justice warns about this in his procedure. Did any of you guys flying find > this to be a problem? In the two 6As I've flown it didn't seem to be a > problem but I really haven't done much braking, and I don't recall which > style rudder pedals they had. > Comments appreciated. > Dennis 6A fuselage in jig Dennis, There was quite a bit of discussion about this a few months ago. Several folks mentioned modifying the side piece so that the pedals would tilt back slightly. I ended up modifying both my left and right side pieces so that the pedals tilt back 10 degrees or so. I found that I had to make the left and right pieces just a bit different, because the geometry is different. I used scrap aluminum to make a pattern, adjusted it until everything fit right, then used the pattern to make the "real" side pieces. Good Luck. Tim ------------------------------------ Tim Lewis N47TD (reserved) RV-6AQ #60023 San Antonio TX timrv6a(at)earthlink.net or timrv6a(at)iname.com ------------------------------------ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ken_Hitchmough(at)magic.ca (Ken Hitchmough)
Date: Jul 25, 1997
Subject: Re: Heat shielding fuel lines.
Mark said I had occasion to travel to PHX last week, and this proved to be a severe test of my abilities to start and keep a F.I. a/c engine running. The instructor I visited said to keep the boost pump running during the time I felt the engine would surge or quit. Hey! This fella seems to have a good tip here! I think I'll see if I can find some of that tape you're talking about. Do you have a brand name? I have never found keeping the boost pump running to have any affect (but I think its a good idea anyway). The tape I used was from a plumbing kind of shop. There was no brand name. I've seen similar stuff in the race car component catalogs, specifically for fuel lines. I'll try and get some more specifics. Ken RV6A Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: cecilth(at)juno.com
Subject: Re: Oshkosh Table - Van's Banquet
<19970714.171214.25007.8.cecilth(at)juno.com>
Date: Jul 25, 1997
Hi Gang, I've made my list 'n checking it twice. This is the last call for this year. If you have any changes, let me know. >Rember, if you have a change of plans, please let me know. > >Cecil Hatfield >Tim Sweemer >Donna Sweemer >Jim Ayers >Jim Cone >Bev Cone >Peter Hanna >Les Rowles >Robert Morley >Zelda Gifford >Bruce Knoll >Ted French >Jack French >Louis Willig >Marty Ssiler >Barbara Sailer >Ed Loveday >Richard Reynolds >Brian Yablon >Hal Kempthorne >Craig Moen >Bob Cornacchio >Ray Edling >Ian Dadd >Bernie Kerr >The Banquet this year is Sunday evening starting at 6:30. >Ticket cost $17.00 >Order your tickets from Vans before July 28. There will only be about > >300 tickets available so first come first served. In the past, those >that order close to deadline can be picked up at Vans booth. > > >So we don't clutter the list, send your name and the number in your >party to me at cecilth(at)juno.com > Before July 29th (when I leave for mecca), keep me posted if I > >need to remove your name. >Cecil Hatfield ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 25, 1997
From: Sharlene Shipley or Bruce Knoll <snsbfk(at)mail.sage.net>
Subject: Re: Can 4 people work on the fuselage construction ?
> Dear Mr. Cheng, Four, or more should be no problem. The Zenair company has, for a number of years, built the 601HD or HDS at Oshkosh and more recently at Sun 'n Fun. My son & I spent about an hour in their tent during a rainstorm and watched their activity at S&F this year. This was a kit aircraft. With a scratch built there should be more than enough work for everyone. The trick for you will be to help them get organized into a functioning group. Good Luck, Bruce Knoll Starting a RV6A after Osh. > >Dear all, > >The interest among my mechanical engineering students who want to work on >the RV-6A construction is overwhelming. It would be very difficult to >shortlist to 4 students working on the fuselage. Being a university >project, I have to stick to the university semester times. Those 4 >students will start on the fuselage next Feb., since they have their >exams. in Oct. and then a long summer vacation break. > >Can anyone tell me if 4 people would be too many to work on the fuselage >construction ? > >Regards >Kamy >University of Western Australia > > > > > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > +-- --+ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ken_Hitchmough(at)magic.ca (Ken Hitchmough)
Date: Jul 25, 1997
Subject: Re: Can 4 people work on the fuselage construction ?
> Can anyone tell me if 4 people would be too many to work on the fuselage > construction ? We had up to 8 working on the fuselage on the AIrBeetle...lots of sub assembly stuff to do...mind you we also had some problems to contend with... ME: "Ahmed, please go to the stores and get me a 1/4 inch drill bit" AHMED:"yes master.....(pause while he thinks)......Master?.... is that 1/4 inch wide or 1/4 inch long!!! Ken RV6A FLying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mikel(at)dimensional.com
Date: Jul 25, 1997
Subject: Re: Wheel fairing balance
>Balancing the nose wheel fairing would require a lot of lead in the nose piece >of the wheel pant. .......but from a weight standpoint you may add excess >weight on the airplane. Which reminds me: How many builders are balancing the MAIN gear wheel pant to minimize vibration/shimmy on the main gears, especially the taildraggers? Just curious........... Michael ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Btinn(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 25, 1997
Subject: Continuing error message
Each time I download another batch of e-mail I keep getting, as the very last message in the list of incoming mail, the following message. "RV-List:Rudder Fitting:File Open error caused download failure." Can something be done to eliminate the offending message from those being sent ? This message has been there for about a week now and it is really getting annoying. I cannot do anything on this end to eliminate it and I wonder if it has caused the e-mail download to abort before all the mail has been delivered. Bob Tinnell RV-6A wings ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 25, 1997
From: Steve Dixon <sdixon(at)jet.laker.net>
Subject: Re: HS and Wing Jig
Jeff, I used aluminium extrusions used for pool / patio screen enclosures. They are strong, light, dimentionally stable, and not very expensive. Steve Dixon RV-8 Wings mari.net!jorear(at)matronics.com wrote: > > > Hello All! > > I am about to get started on my HS for my 6A and would like to get > the opinion of the group regarding the importance of jigs that are as > straight as an arrow and are dimensionally stable. I have at my > disposal the ability to manufacture a jig that is made from southern > pine 2x4's that are laminated together. If any of you have seen > buildings that have exposed laminated wooden beams, it is of the same > type of construction. I might add that the same type of laminated > products were used on the recent restoration of the Constitution (aka > "OLD Iron Sides"). To say the least, the end product is an extemely > solid beam that is straight, and is going to stay that way. > > My question is, have any experienced builders out there (that is > ones who have built thier wings and empenages) had any trouble with > using lumberyard wood to build your jigs? Have you had problems with > attaining lumber that is straight enough, and if so, has changes in > humidity and temperatures been a problem? My main concern is if the > above constructed jig is worth the effort, and if it is, whether other > builders would be interested in being able to get such a jig. Please > understand that I am not selling anything yet. Just testing the water > to see if it is something that other RV'ers would see an advange in > using. Last thing I want to do is get flamed here! > > Anyone that is interested or has an opinion can post here to the > list if you think that our group would be interested in hearing it. > Otherwise send me an E-mail direct at: > > Jeff Orear > jorear(at)mari.net > > Thanks! > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: winterland(at)rkymtnhi.com
Date: Jul 25, 1997
Subject: Re: New Nose Wheel Shimmy
barnardaircraft wrote: > > > Hi Mike, > Balancing the nose wheel would require a lot of lead in the nose piece of > the wheel pant. Balancing the wheel pants may sound good in theory and my be applicable in some circumstances, however I don't think it is in this one. In this case the problem was none existant during the first few flights and then showed itself up later. So, something changed. The weight and balance of the wheel pants did not change during those flights so the problem must be something else. If the wheel pants balance were the problem, then the shimmy would have been present from flight number one. At this point, I am convinced that the nose wheel breakout point needs to be re-set and the amount of grease in the bearings needs to be lessened, and finally my skill needs to improve to keep the weight off the nose longer during roll out. We'll find out this weekend. Andy ________________________________________________________________________________
From: winterland(at)rkymtnhi.com
Date: Jul 25, 1997
Subject: Re: RV maintenance manual?
> One RV Aircraft Maintenance Manual is available from Aircraft Spruce or from > C.R. Supply P.O. Box 46 Manitou Springs,CO 80829 $ 16.00. > I'll be glad to send you mine , it's not a very satisfactory book. > E-mail me your address but do it fast as I'm on my way to Oshkosh for my 18th OK, your on.... I'll copy it and send it back. My address is: Andy Gold PO Box 270 Tabernash, CO 80478 Have fun at Oshkosh. I think I am going to miss it this year. My plane's to new for a long trip (just 8.5 hrs TT so far) and I promissed myself to stay away from the airlines once the RV was finished. Anyway, there are lots of local shows coming up along with Van's homecoming. Thanks again, Andy ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stephen J. Soule" <SSoule(at)pfclaw.com>
Subject: AirBeetle
Date: Jul 25, 1997
charset="iso-8859-1" I know that everyone on the list but me knows already, but what is or was the "AirBeetle"? Steve Soule Uninformed in Huntington, Vermont ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Cafgef(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 25, 1997
Subject: Re: New Nose Wheel Shimmy
<< I also forgot to mention that most of us are probably using a $20.00 fish scale made in Taiwan which is probably not real accurate. >> I don't have a $20.00 fish scale. I'm thinking about using a 20# barbell weight and some rope and a pully. I just have to make sure that I am pulling straight sideways to the wheel. Gene, cafgef(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tim Lewis" <timrv6a@italy-c.it.earthlink.net>
Date: Jul 25, 1997
Subject: Engine Control Cables
Listers, I'm about to order my engine control cables from ACS, but I want any feedback you have before I do that. I've elected to buy the A-790 cables (one each for throttle, mixture, and prop governor). These are the solid .078 stainless core cables. I plan to just buy the 6' long ones, and cut to the correct length after I mount the engine. I plan to use plain old 1/4" AN742 loop clamps to secure the cables to Van's throttle/mixtre and prop governor brackets. I plan to use "B" nuts from ACS to connect the cable ends to the carb and prop governor. I'm also planning to use three of the "Cable Safe" devices from ACS that secure the cable to the firewall. I'm going with the solid wire cables so that I can mount them to my sub panel now, and cut them to length later when I hang the engine. Any thoughts on my plans? Thanks, Tim Lewis ------------------------------------ Tim Lewis N47TD (reserved) RV-6AQ #60023 San Antonio TX timrv6a(at)earthlink.net or timrv6a(at)iname.com ------------------------------------ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JHeadric(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 25, 1997
Subject: Re: R&L mags
The "R" and "L" on Slick magnetos means Right and Left hand rotation, not the side of the engine it is mounted on. Jim H. A&P-IA ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 25, 1997
From: Rick Osgood <rick(at)ccc.henn.tec.mn.us>
Subject: W 425 placement
Can anyone help me with a fax, drawing or e-mail attachment of the correct placement of the W-425 piece. This goes in my RV6A wing by the bellcrank. Unfortunately, my plans are older and do not include this part. Thanks in advance -- Rick Osgood Hennipen Technical College Eden Prairie, MN ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 25, 1997
From: Chris Ruble <cruble(at)cisco.com>
Subject: Airport near Ashville, NC?
Can anybody tell me what the airport that is the nearest to Ashville NC? I'm specificaly looking for a good flight school. Chris cruble(at)cisco.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 25, 1997
From: Mike Wills <willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil>
Subject: Re: New Nose Wheel Shimmy
A shimmy (variation of a resonance) may not be caused by an out of balance component in a system, but it certainly could be exacerbated by an out of balance condition. I agree that Steve's explanation probably does explain the root cause of the shimmy, and continue to believe that balancing the pant will tend to reduce the tendancy for a shimmy to develop (provided of course that you can stand to carry the extra weight).


July 15, 1997 - July 25, 1997

RV-Archive.digest.vol-dd