RV-Archive.digest.vol-df

August 07, 1997 - August 19, 1997



      
      
      Chevy lovers:
      
      The GM performance parts Catalog is on the www.  Download your free GM
      Performance Parts Catalog from the WWW.  Try it at
      http://www.gmgoodwrench.com/gmpp/r3200.htm    Hope I got it right.
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 07, 1997
From: RELOSVCS!WESTREG!EHENSON(at)cldwell.attmail.com (Henson, Eric)
Subject: Moving RV assemblies
Hi Jim, I am an analyst for a very large relocation company, who shall remain nameless. I just wanted to bring up one point to look out for. If you are moving anytime soon just remember that all van lines are booked past capacity since everyone wants to move during the summer. They readily contract for additional help and hire anyone that can lift heavy objects. By Sept. most of these people will not be employed by the van lines so damaging your leading edge is not going to affect their career. I would suggest you pack it yourself and closely supervise the loading process. Also I would put several bright orange signs on the packed assemblies broadcasting what it is, and that it is fragile. The trick is, to lend the impression that you are monitoring the treatment of your goods. Also mention your concern and the value of the wings to the driver, he is the contractor and partial damages will come out of his pocket. More than likely he will bend over backwards to get them there undamaged. An ounce of prevention.......you know. Eric Henson Wing Tanks These are my personal opinions and do not reflect the ideas or intent of my employer. >>>From: James M Schmidt >>Will they insure if I crate or must I trust there crating? schmidtjm(at)juno.com or jim.schmidt(at)mei.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 07, 1997
From: Dave Barnhart <barnhart(at)a.crl.com>
Subject: Re: FAA accepted call sign
>Actually, I believe that to be completely correct you'd have to say >"three three three" instead of "triple three". > >OTOH, there's an aircraft here in NZ whose registration is "SSS" (we >only have 3-letter registrations, no numbers) which is commonly referred >to as "Sierra three". And I used to fly a Cessna 172 out of HHR whose N-number ended in 555. Everyone called in as 'triple nickel' Regards, Dave Barnhart RV-6 sn 23744 N601DB engine arrives next week ________________________________________________________________________________
From: jlock(at)centuryinter.net
Subject: vision microsystems
Date: Aug 07, 1997
Does anyone have an option, either good or bad, about using vision microsystems for their engine monitoring insturments. I visited their booth at the big show and was impressed with what it does. However, the RVers I hang with don't like the idea of putting all their eggs in one basket. jeff ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 07, 1997
From: lottmc(at)datastar.net (Michael C. Lott)
Subject: vents
I have two nasa type vents and the only good place I can see to install them would be right below the canopy skirt on the fuselage side. Is this a bad place because of low pressure? I was going to mount them in the canopy skirt but it wouldn't be flat enough. Thanks. Michael ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6160hp(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 07, 1997
Subject: LP Aero Plastics at OSH, acrylic canopy tips
WHAT A OSH! Congrats to Van's A/C and all those beautiful home built planes. And did we find good tips or what!? Got energized again!!! Just loved the fellow's passenger warning went like: "Passenger Warning...Bla....Bla.. Amateur built...Bla..Bla..not to .Federal Standards......" Well he added something to it, like. "But also remember the Titanic was built by professionals while the Ark was home built by amateurs". While at OSH, I visited extensively with a helpful fellow from LP Aero Plastics. I gleamed many tid bits from the "professionals"?. He said they break their share of windows too. $20K windscreen in a Citation you know, quoted while trying to cheer me up. If you have a fax viewer software, and you can handle a *.awd file extension, you e'mail me off the list requesting a copy of the LP Aero fax I logged in to my PC. It is 6 pages of decent stuff to read about. You can view and print out the pages your self later too. If not capable, included is a partial condensed summary below. So here goes: Practice on scraps first he said. Practice, practice, practice. Did you know you should not store the wind screen with plastic protector covering and expose it to sunlight. They might become permanently fused. Be advised, it has ruined many, so watch light coming through windows into building areas. Setting out in sun to warm can ruin it too. Also re:acrylic ambient heat does open up the window for "workability" although it is slight, much less important than one might think. Don't use wood or any other bits but zero rake plexi bits. Drill with a SLOW electric, light hand drill. Press very lightly. When drilling it really will be scraping off slowly. No biting or big spiral curls desired, for then you're pushing to hard. Also your not trying to melt through. No backward rotations either. Holes generally are to be oversized, 1.3 times the fastener, for vibration and different thermal expansion rates between alum and plexi. No pop rivets are to be used. They suggest c/s washers, lock nuts and bolts, or gook sealing it in. Tighten screws while reflecting a high intensity light across the surface, watch into surface near screw for distortion as it tightens up. Distort then back off slightly. A tight enough screw, may turn in final assembly with a screw driver, go around with little effort. But with a lock nut, will stay put. Break all sharp edges. Use 150 grit sand paper. Do not start with a hole any bigger than 1/4" diameter, smaller would be better. Step up in drilling sequence/sizes. Do countersink all screws. Plus use countersunk finishing washers too. (I saw lots at OSH following this all around their canopies, leaving pops out). Watch mounting surfaces for and bumps and sharpness which will cause stress risers, under plexi. Do not flame edges, not recommended. Rather progress with sand paper from 150, 220, 400, 600 and power buff is what they do he told me. Their edges on display pieces sure looked polished up like a flamed job too, water-dark-clear. So it appears with lots of elbow grease this too can be had the hard way, sanding. Power sanders, belt or disc OK to use for this too, support your piece. Didn't really get what he had in mind for the power buffing stuff though. Oh yeah I almost forgot, drill in a competely free state, off or unfastened from the plane. No stresses while drilling. Respectfully, David McManmon, RV6 Cicero NY. (N# request and check in mail to OK, thanks to FAA folks providing immediate search while at OSH). PS: Now with 2nd canopy ordered. Boo hoo hoo...... but given the above, I see about 4 to 5 things I was doing wrong!!!, and I thought only 1 thing I did was wrong, albiet many builders advised of many infractions to above, with out bad luck though. Van's A/C and Airplane Plastic, Ohio (their manufacturer) treating me right too. And I'm quite sure they'd tell you all this stuff too. At OSH Van's booth was crowded each of the 4-5 times I went there. (His seminars had overflowing tents too). But have talked to both on phone recently, they care. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Moore"<dmoore8(at)tuelectric.com>
Date: Aug 07, 1997
Subject: Re: Wiring
Subject: RV-List: Wiring The following question was received: 1. Is there any way to keep voltage out of the cockpit until you turn on the master? I thought I wouldn't have that problem since I have a switch that grounds the terminal on the master that pulls in the master. I didn't think about the 12 volts feeding through the coil of the master back to the switch in the cockpit. I couldn't think of any way around this. Is there?? You have it configured correctly. I know of no practical way to keep voltage out of the cockpit. Since that is where the battery is, it will have hot leads to the master, the master switch, and to a clock (if you have one installed). I also don't see a problem with it. Make sure your connections are good and don't worry about it. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 07, 1997
From: Mike Hartmann <hartmann(at)sound.net>
Subject: Re: FAA accepted call sign
At 11:30 8/7/97 UT, you wrote: > >I read somewhere that there was an FAA-accepted call sign for RVs, other than >the standard "EXPERIMENTAL". In other words, in a Cessna 172 with tail number I haven't seen anything officially recognizing the RVs as a distinct type for purposes of communication with ATC. Glassair used to be listed, even though there were fewer of them than a number of other types at the time. There is currently a note, that makes sense to me, that indicates that specific types are not listed for experimental aircraft because: "Configuration diversity and the fact that airworthiness certificates are issued to aircraft builders, vice manufacturers, necessitates the assignment of generic aircraft type designators based on cruise performance, rather than specific manufacturer and normal descriptive/performance information." You can call your aircraft anything you like when communicating with ATC, just remember to comply with FAR Part 91.319(d)(3) when checking on with a tower. Regardless of what you decide to call it on the air, you must tell the notify the tower that it is experimental. This applies to any of the experimentals, not just amateur-built. There is no particular advantage to using the type with the call sign in place of the 'november' except that it helps to sort out who the call was for if two aircraft have remotely similar call signs. Using 'experimental' serves the same purpose unless more than one aircraft was an experimental, but then, both could well be RVs, since the RV is the most common type of experimental. Sometimes using the type helps to wake up the pilot who might not be paying attention, but this primarily applies to Bonanza and Mooney drivers. Just to show how little help the name might be, there are four approved type names for the PA28 and three for the C172. The computer will accept just about anything short enough to fit when you file a flight plan, but only 'HXB' is actually correct for any of the RVs. If you file anything else, some poor controller who has actually taken a few minutes to read the book (that'd be me) will have to make the correction later. In short, call your aircraft whatever you want but keep it simple and be sure to tell a tower it is experimental. Use your FULL call sign on EACH transmission unless ATC shortens it, at which time you may also abbreviate it. If you file flight plans, use HXB as the type for any RV (experimental, 100-200 Kts cruise). If you like, put something like 'RV-6' in remarks to keep curious controllers from asking what it is when they see your groundspeed. If you are able to cruise at over 200 Knots, file as HXC and tell us all how you did it. - Mike hartmann(at)sound.net http://www.sound.net/~hartmann ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1997
From: Kam Yuk CHENG <kamy(at)cyllene.uwa.edu.au>
Subject: pitot tube fitting /
Dear all, 1. pitot tube fitting (PART NO. AN832 - 4D) In Van's drawing No. 20 for RV6A, we canot work out which way round the tube fitting should go. One end of the fitting has 2 lots of threads, the other end has one lot of thread. Which end should go inside the wing ? 2. Fult tank rib (Pat no. T-403R) The fuel tank rib comes with some holes already machined. A ring part no. T-407 sits on one side of the rib. One of the plate nut mounting holes which goes through the ring to the rib comes through right next to the machined hole in the tank rib T-403R. This mounting hole has to be counter-sunk. However, it is so close to the already machined hole that it will break through to the machined hole. Can anyone suggest what is the best way to solve this problem ? Best regards Kamy Cheng University of Western Australia - RV6A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MAlexan533(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 08, 1997
Subject: Re: Painting
I would just use about a 300 grit wet and dry sandpaper and sand all the weave of the fiberglass out. I found it doesnt take that long to get the weave out, and is better looking and lighter than adding and sanding filler. Regarding paint, several of my fellow builders as well as myself prefer Centauri by Dupont in acrylic enamel. One thing most builders are not aware of is that if you are not an experienced painter, stay with solid, non-metallic colors. Metallics are more difficult to apply and require more experience. I learned this the hard way. Hope this helps. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 08, 1997
Subject: Re: vents
<< I have two nasa type vents and the only good place I can see to install them would be right below the canopy skirt on the fuselage side. Is this a bad place because of low pressure? I was going to mount them in the canopy skirt but it wouldn't be flat enough. Thanks. Michael >> You don't say if this is a -4 or -6. Search the archives for -4 instructions, or email me off the list. Check six! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1997
From: spjohnsn(at)ix.netcom.com (Stephen Paul Johnson)
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
You wrote: > > >Does anyone have an option, either good or bad, about using vision microsystems >for their engine monitoring insturments. I visited their booth at the big show >and was impressed with what it does. However, the RVers I hang with don't like >the idea of putting all their eggs in one basket. > >jeff Jeff, I have the luxury of waiting to see how the reliability of the device proves out in use, since I won't be at that stage for awhile. Having said that, I am impressed with the functions you don't get with standard analog instruments that it provides, such as trend monitoring and fault warning. When you get right down to it, the plane can still be flown to a safe landing with all of the engine instruments out of service. A big consideration is their warranty/service policy if you get stranded somewhere. Steve Johnson RV-8 #80121 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rust47rg(at)one.net
Date: Aug 08, 1997
Subject: Re: FAA accepted call sign
>If you are able to cruise at over 200 Knots, file as HXC and tell us all how >you did it. > >- Mike >hartmann(at)sound.net Mike: When I first started flying my 4, 3 years ago, I filed as an HXB. Probably 2 years ago the friendly Flight Service guy said we could file as an RV-whatever as it was now accepted in the system for flight plans. I've never had a problem with DUATS or flight service filing as an RV-4. I still call in as an Experimental although I think they should give us a designator that would be more descriptive. Hey an experimental could be anything from a Breezy to an BD-10 jet. I would think the tower types would like to know what is about to enter their airspace so they could have a better idea on how to sequence traffic. Rergards: Rusty Gossard N47RG RV-4 Flying since 8-94 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ken_Hitchmough(at)magic.ca (Ken Hitchmough)
Date: Aug 08, 1997
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
Does anyone have an option, either good or bad, about using vision microsystems for their engine monitoring insturments. I visited their booth at the big show and was impressed with what it does. However, the RVers I hang with don't like the idea of putting all their eggs in one basket. I think it depends on how good the basket is. The VM1000 is a very high quality system and having installed several in the AirBeetle, experienced no problems. There are also a class of folk who believe the old mechanical instruments are the only way...I'm not one of them. I'm running with a VM style system, my panel is less cluttered and my scan is much smaller. I also get a few more "wows" than I probably would have with a whole bunch of gauges. The beaty of this system is that the dials are "analog" so you can still glance and get a sense of where everything is without having to read numbers. Yes, it is a central point of failure but if this worries you why are you building a single engined 'plane? Its also no really big deal to put a standby tach and oil pressure gauge somewhere until your confidence in it goes up..then take em out. If you can afford it (its not cheap) and you like it, then its YOUR basket. You should also check out the Audio Flight Avionics system...this one is much cheaper and speaks to you. Admittedley it doesn't have the sexy display of the VM1000 but I'm sure it will soon Ken RV6A Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Lauritsen" <clevtool(at)tdsi.net>
Subject: Cleaveland Tool web page update
Date: Aug 08, 1997
Thanks to the help of Mike Hartmann I was able to finish our PDF catalog and put it on-line for the viewing. The catalog is available in two versions... a file that is ~1.5meg to download, unzip, and view in Adobe Acrobat Reader, and the other version is by viewing it directly from your web browser using the Acrobat plug in. This will give everyone access to all of the pictures and descriptions in our catalog. Thanks, Mike Lauritsen Cleaveland Aircraft Tool 2225 First St. Boone, IA 50036 1-800-368-1822 clevtool(at)tdsi.net http://www.cleavelandtool.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1997
From: Scott Gesele <scottg(at)icsnet.com>
Subject: Re: pitot tube fitting /
>1. pitot tube fitting (PART NO. AN832 - 4D) > >In Van's drawing No. 20 for RV6A, we canot work out which way round the >tube fitting should go. One end of the fitting has 2 lots of threads, the >other end has one lot of thread. Which end should go inside the wing ? > It really doesn't matter. On my RV-6A, the bulkhead fitting was installed with the nut on the inside (one set of threads on the outside of the wing). This was only done for cosmetic reasons. Hope this helps. Scott Gesele N506RV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stephen J. Soule" <SSoule(at)pfclaw.com>
Subject: pitot tube fitting /
Date: Aug 08, 1997
charset="iso-8859-1" Same with me. The drawing really wasn't much help. I did it the way Scott suggests after looking at some of the RVs at the RV forum in Oswego, New York two years ago. Steve -----Original Message----- From: Scott Gesele [SMTP:icsnet.com!scottg(at)matronics.com] Sent: Friday, August 08, 1997 9:25 AM To: rv-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Re: RV-List: pitot tube fitting / >1. pitot tube fitting (PART NO. AN832 - 4D) > >In Van's drawing No. 20 for RV6A, we canot work out which way round the >tube fitting should go. One end of the fitting has 2 lots of threads, the >other end has one lot of thread. Which end should go inside the wing ? > It really doesn't matter. On my RV-6A, the bulkhead fitting was installed with the nut on the inside (one set of threads on the outside of the wing). This was only done for cosmetic reasons. Hope this helps. Scott Gesele N506RV +-- --+ | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | | --- | | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | | --- | | Please aggressivly edit quoted text on a followup posting! | +-- --+ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stephen J. Soule" <SSoule(at)pfclaw.com>
Subject: RE: RV Forum in Fulton Coutny NY
Date: Aug 08, 1997
Does anyone know the dates of the RV Forum at EAA chapter 486 in Oswego, New York? I lost the paperwork! Steve Soule Huntington, Vermont ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6ator(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 08, 1997
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
Jeff, After several years of putting up with mechanical engine instruments in my SIX, I finally decided to bite the bullet and retrofit the Vision Microsystems EPI-800 system. I would of liked to go with the VMI-1000 system but that would have required a total panel rework, instead I just replaced my existing 2 1/4" instruments with the EPI-800 gauges. The system is light, easy to install and very accurate. In over 400 hours of operation I have not had a single problem with any part of the system. At first the initial cost might seem high, but when you look at what you get for the money it really is a pretty good value. A fuel flow computer alone can run nearly $1000, as well as a 4 cyl egt/cht scanner. If you are still in the panel design stages I would go with the 1000 single display system, you can really save some panel space. Regards, Bill Mahoney Sherman, CT RV-6 N747W ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DkSJC(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 08, 1997
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
Johnson) >Does anyone have an option, either good or bad, about using vision microsystems Jeff, I have the luxury of waiting to see how the reliability of the device proves out in use, since I won't be at that stage for awhile. >> I haven't yet decided whether I'll us the Visions System, but reliability is a major factor in its favor. Visions is a long established company and I've heard nothing but good things about them. An aquaintance that flies competion aerobatics in an Extra300 swears by the system. This is the 3rd airplane he's had it in without any reliability problems to date. His only problem has been that the microprocessor and warning system respond so much faster than conventional instruments he got a lot of momentary warnings during hard acro. I believe Visions worked out a specific software fix for his situation. Dan Helm Rv-4 Post finishing kit ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BAWH <bawh(at)apci.net>
Subject: Re: CONTACT! Magazine
Date: Aug 08, 1997
Mr. Mojzisik (and the list): I must agree with you. I'm also a charter subscriber. Though the Air Force has moved me from Tucson to Illinois, to Korea, and back to Illinois, I've missed only one issue -- because I didn't renew in time. Mick wrapped the back issue, had the hastle of customs labels, and sent it to Korea. I'd be very surprised to find his treatment any different for anyone else. Andy Hecker > >> Contact! magazine is the only periodical which specializes in: >> Auto Engine Conversions >> Airplane Design and Construction > >IF...you actually get the copies you paid good subscription money for. I >didn't. > >Rob Acker / r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com / RV-6 Quickbuild in slowbuild mode... :( Rob, I can understand your frustration but you have to understand that "Contact!" is a very small publication by Mick Myal and that an occasional subscription problem can occur. I am a charter subscriber and have never missed an issue. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1997
From: Robert Acker <r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
>can run nearly $1000, as well as a 4 cyl egt/cht scanner. If you are still in >the panel design stages I would go with the 1000 single display system, you >can really save some panel space. Having previously posted some comparisons of electronic engine monitors, I'm enjoying following this thread. I posted some erroneous data concerning the Allegro M816 (not on purpose, the old literature was in error and since been corrected). It provides the following functions in one 2.25" instrument with all probes and sensors for $1795 (they also have a 2.25" tach/MP instrument available): Scans (with user settable alarmed limits) and displays: All EGT's All CHT's Oil Pressure Fuel Pressure Oil Temp Carb Temp Volts Amps Fuel Totalizer (when hooked to gps also fuel required to next waypoint and final destination - warns if not enough) Shock Cooling Mode Lean-to-Peak Mode Clock Outside Air Temp Alarm is via audio into headset/speaker and flashing display. I bought one because I felt it offered the best performance/price/panel space ratio and because it has a lifetime warranty should it fail. We'll see how it works out. Rob Acker / r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com / RV-6Q ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1997
From: "John B. Abell" <jbabell(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: FAA accepted call sign
Steve, On page 9 of the October 1995 Sport Aviation magazine, there's a brief article that reads, in part, as follows: "HOMEBUILT DESIGNATORS" "When pilots of homebuilt aircraft file flight plans or make pilot reports (PIREPs), most use the generic designators HXA, HXB, and HXC, as appropriate. However, many are apparently unaware that designators have been assigned for specific homebuilt designs. FAA Order 7340.1N Contractions lists the following: . . . Van's RV-6/6A RV6 . . . Owners and pilots of these aircraft are urged to use the designators. It makes Search and Rescue easier when searchers know what they are looking for, and it makes PIREPs more useable. Our thanks to EAA member (and FAA Enroute Flight Advisory Specialist) John B. Hyde of Oakland, CA for this information." I assumed that the use of these designators extended to ATC communications. I was pleased to see Fred Stucklen verify this. I also agree that the use of the phrase "triple" anything isn't quite kosher, so to speak, but when I used to fly a Piper Archer N333DE, it worked for me and no one ever challenged it. If anyone ever does, my guess is that the three threes will go back to him/her in a very sarcastic tone of voice. The point of communications, after all, is to communicate efficiently and that implies terse transmissions. The article also lists RV3 and RV4 as designators. (It was written before the RV-8 was announced.) Jack Abell RV-6A N333JA (Reserved) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rust47rg(at)one.net
Date: Aug 08, 1997
Subject: Re: RE: RV Forum in Fulton Coutny NY
>Does anyone know the dates of the RV Forum at EAA chapter 486 in Oswego, >New York? > >Steve Soule 27 September at KFZY Oswego County Airport for further info call 315-469-3763 or 315-446-6928 so the flyer says...... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1997
From: "Scott M. Kuebler" <keebs(at)buffnet.net>
Subject: Re: RE: RV Forum in Fulton Coutny NY
Stephen J. Soule wrote: > Does anyone know the dates of the RV Forum at EAA chapter 486 in Oswego, > New York? > Saturday 27th & Sunday 28th of September. I will be driving in from Buffalo. Scott RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1997
From: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: FAA accepted call sign
> > Van's RV-6/6A RV6 > > . . . > > Owners and pilots of these aircraft are urged to use the designators. > It makes Search and Rescue easier when searchers know what they are > looking for, and it makes PIREPs more useable. > I have found a couple of times when flying into places where RV's are less known and I use the RV designator ATC has come back with "Army please say number again" > > I also agree that the use of the phrase "triple" anything isn't quite > kosher, so to speak, but when I used to fly a Piper Archer N333DE, it > worked for me and no one ever challenged it. If anyone ever does, my > guess is that the three threes will go back to him/her in a very > sarcastic tone of voice. The point of communications, after all, is > to > communicate efficiently and that implies terse transmissions. > Here at Hillsboro there used to be a Cessna that had a number such as 123MM and he used to always call in as 123 Mickey Mouse. I never heard anyone get after him for calling in his number that way. -- Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS First flight July 14, 1989 :-) Hillsboro, OR jsflyrv(at)ix.netcom.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rimbold(at)apollo.hp.com
Date: Aug 08, 1997
(aol.com!DkSJC(at)matronics.com)
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
> Does anyone have an option, either good or bad, about using vision > microsystems Has anyone ever had excess heat cause a problem with their electronic cockpit displays? I've seen cockpit heat blacken an LCD engine monitor until the cockpit temperature dropped (about 10 minutes after the canopy was tipped up). It's only for this reason that I'm leaning away from using electronic displays. I believe that gas plasma or LED displays won't have this problem. The Vision display is all LCD. Would anyone from Florida using one of these please comment? 'Rob ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1997
From: "Grant E. Young" <gyoung(at)crl.nmsu.edu>
Subject: RV-6a emp & wings 4 sale
This is from a friend. The empennage is very nice. ***************************** RV6A Project: Empennage complete, wing kit 20% completed (not pre-punched). Phlogiston spars, BAC quick-build kit, plans and video. $5,500. jem(at)crl.nmsu.edu or 505/522-4854. ***************************** grant in New Mexico ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BigCfly001(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 08, 1997
Subject: elevator v-blocks
dear listers, while setting up the v-block jig for my elevators I cant help but wonder if all this perfectness in the level and plumb department is necessary with the pre-punched kit.I can see being reasonably accurate with your set up, but it seems to me that with the pre-punched parts things havn't much choice but to fall into place.have the jigs become just a nice place to hold our control surfaces?I spend alot of time getting these things "just right"I'm beginning to wonder if I'm doing this for nothing.any opinions/comments would be greatly appreciated. chris marion rv-6 r-elevator cincy oh ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: RV Forum in Fulton County NY
From: lm4(at)juno.com (Larry Mac Donald)
Date: Aug 08, 1997
writes: Does anyone know the dates of the RV Forum at EAA chapter 486 in Oswego, New York I lost the paperwork! Steve Soule Huntington, Vermont Steve, It goes like this. 3rd annual northeast RV forum Presented by Chapt. 486 Bill Hodge---Chariman 110 Orchard Ave. Nedrow, N.Y. Oswego County Airport, Fulton N.Y. ( FZY ) ( informal friday evening cookout ) September 27th, 1997 Free camping for tents, Trailers and Motor homes ( NO HOOKUPS ) Factory rep will be in attendance with the RV-8. RV rides will be available ( weather permitting ) Forums to include: Sheet metal construction and special tools Advanced wiring Painting--glasurit Engine, new or rebuilt Propellers, metal or wood Fitting those fiberglass parts FAA Experiences, lessons learned First flight RV aircraft and flying the RV-8 Manufacturers on site Van's Aircraft Sensenich Lycoming $35.00 Includes Saturday: Forums, Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner Questions?? Call Bill Hodge at 315-469-3763 after six or Ken Graves at 315-446-6928 after Aug. 1st HTH Larry Mac Donald lm4(at)juno.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1997
From: Kevin & Theresa Horton <khorton(at)cyberus.ca>
Subject: RV-8 H-stab & jig size?
Hi there, I just ordered my RV-8 tail kit, and plan to build a work bench in the next few days. I found the following in the archive: >The horizontal stabilizer is 95" across when finished (RV4). Make your >workbench about 93" wide (instead of the convenient 96"!) and you >will be able to assemble the elevators to the horizontal stab on the >bench, leaving the counterbalance arms overhanging the ends of the >bench. This sounds like a good idea, but I am wondering what the RV-8 horizontal stab width is? I also would appreciate a list of wood sizes and length needed to build the jig. I want to get any extra wood I need now so it can be as dry as possible when the jig goes together. I am really itching to get going on this - I hope the tail kit and the big box of Avery's tools arrive soon. Thanks for the help, Kevin Horton future RV-8 builder (lurking and gathering info, tools, etc) khorton(at)cyberus.ca Engineering Test Pilot Transport Canada Ottawa, Canada ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1997
From: Hamilton McClymont <hammcc(at)istar.ca>
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
Rob: Where can I find out more about the > Allegro M816 Does the maker have a website? Cheers, Hammy [CYVR] ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1997
From: Scott Gesele <scottg(at)icsnet.com>
Subject: Dropping objects
Listers, At a reduced power setting and airspeed, can the tip-up canopy on an RV-6A be opened enough to drop objects during flight? As long as persons or property on the ground aren't in danger, the FAA allows this. I'm getting rather close to flying and was hoping that something the size of a new roll of toilet paper could be dropped. "Others" who have done this in a 152 say it can be real fun to cut the resulting streamer with the wings :))) Scott Gesele N506RV (At airport, wings and tail on) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BARNES_ERIC(at)tandem.com
Date: Aug 08, 1997
Subject: Re: elevator v-blocks
chris marion wrote: >..while setting up the v-block jig for my elevators I cant help but >wonder if all this perfectness in the level and plumb department is >necessary with the pre-punched kit... I really thought about this after watching the Orndorff video, where he drills the control surfaces and spar first thing, out of the jig. I don't know how much twist can be introduced *after* the drilling is done, but given the concern for riveting patterns, I'm not going to take any chances. I would guess the jigs took about an hour for me to set up, both rudder and elevator, which isn't much in the scheme of things. I figured, at 220 mph, I don't want any twist at all, if I can help it. Playing it safe. Still wonder if it's necessary though, just like you Chris. EB #80131 - empennage, wings getting tired of sitting in the boxes. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1997
From: mauser(at)claris.com (Richard Chandler)
Subject: Re: Cleaveland Tool web page update
> > Thanks to the help of Mike Hartmann I was able to finish our PDF > catalog and put it on-line for the viewing. The catalog is available > in two versions... a file that is ~1.5meg to download, unzip, and view > in Adobe Acrobat Reader, and the other version is by viewing it > directly from your web browser using the Acrobat plug in. This will > give everyone access to all of the pictures and descriptions in > our catalog. Not to start a debate, but Acrobat is a really bad to to use for things that are only meant to be read on a computer. While it's a really nice way of bundling pictures and postcript for pre-press and such, it's needlessly bulky and not compatable with all computer systems. If it's a simple conversion of the files used to print your catalog, that's one thing, but a straight HTML version with .gifs or .Jpegs is probably a better way to go. (Who has a .pdf reader for Amiga, eh? :-) -- Richard Chandler RV-6: Garage bought and being finished, saving for tools and tail kit. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JDaniel343(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 08, 1997
Subject: RV-6 Demo Ride
I want to thank Bill Benedict, Mike Seger and Van for one of the most enjoyable flights I've ever had. On Wednesday afternoon I spoke with Bill about getting a demo ride in one of the Rv-6's. He said he had an opening on Monday, I told him I would be leaving on Sunday. He looked again and said how about 10:30 tommorrow. You bet!! I showed up early on Thursday morning and at 10:00 Mike Seger showed up and away we went. We flew over the lake to the east, did a wing over, slow flight, steep turns, ect. What a ride and what performance, so light on the stick. I have never flown a stick before but it just seemed natural. If you ever get a chance to fly a RV aircraft don't turn it down but then I'm sure if your reading this you never would. Thanks again to everyone at VANS. John L. Danielson Rv-6A Tail done, Wing ordered ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1997
From: "prosales(at)qnet.com" <prosales(at)qnet.com>
Subject: rv6 builders inphoienix,az?]
From: "Mark Alonzo Van-Y" <MVANY(at)apsc.com> Subject: rv6 builders inphoienix,az? Date: 8 Aug 1997 10:21:31 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: s28dhcp70.apsc.com hi out there! any one in the peoria/goodear arizona area building a rv6-give a yell. lots of questions and need answers. mvany93777(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Rozendaal" <dougr(at)netins.net>
Subject: Re: Dropping objects
Date: Jan 07, 1980
I'm getting > rather close to flying and was hoping that something the size of a new roll > of toilet paper could be dropped. "Others" who have done this in a 152 say > it can be real fun to cut the resulting streamer with the wings :))) Until you get it in the Carb and the engine quits,(been there done that, see my homepage) or in the cooling intake and you burn up a cylinder.... Or much worse you are looking over your shoulder and pulling around to take another swat at it and you accelerate a stall with the ball out of center, now you are upside down closer to the ground than you thought you were. When you start flying your airplane you can have enough fun with out trying to chase toilet paper. IMHO Tailwinds, Doug Rozendaal dougr(at)netins.net www.petroblend.com/dougr ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1997
From: Robert Acker <r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Allegro M816
Since I posted the message about the Allegro M816, I've received quite a few requests for contact info so am posting it here. If you don't receive a personal reply please don't be offended, this way's easier . Allegro Avionics E-mail: Allegro1(at)dakotacom.net Web Page: ? - don't know if they have one Phone: 520-327-3695 Fax: 520-327-0426 Tell 'em Rob A. sent ya! Rob Acker / r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com / RV-6Q ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 08, 1997
Subject: Re: FAA accepted call sign
<< Our thanks to EAA member (and FAA Enroute Flight Advisory Specialist) John B. Hyde of Oakland, CA for this information." >> It is my great pleasure to have Mr. Hyde as my hangar mate (at LVK) and buddy. He's a great guy and owns/flies a Kitfox 2 w/582 that I built back in '91. He is also a wealth of arcane aircraft/war information and not only speaks Chinese but a few other Asian tongues. He flew King Airs for Air America in 'Nam and Helicopters for the Army. He loves RVs and homebuilts of every stripe. Call Flight Watch (122.0 MHz) in the SF Bay Area during weekdays and give him a PIREP. You can even give it to him in Chinese. -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: colquitt(at)ns1.onramp.tuscaloosa.al.us
Date: Aug 08, 1997
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
Jeff asked about Vision Microsystems: > Does anyone have an option, either good or bad, about using vision microsystems > for their engine monitoring insturments. Jeff, VM has two instrument packages, one the "everything but the kitchen sink on one screen" version and the other is a package of 2 1/4 inch (more conventional looking) instruments. My hangar partner has the latter. A number of people I know have made the same choice if choosing VM. But my hangar partner lost his instrumentation once because of something going wrong that "crashed" most if not all of the VM instruments until he could get the needed part. Nice plane, couldn't fly. Some type of sending unit problem. Personally, I like the EI package. I have an Ultimate Scanner. It reads all four cylinders' EGT and CHT automatically, and I can add four more indicators in the same 2 1/4 inch instrument (such as carb temp and outside air temp). This box scans and reports both EGT and CHT without a switch. The VM option requires two 4-position switches. Plenty of people buy VM though. Either way - VM or EI - it's not cheap, baby. ;-) Joe Colquitt Flying RV-3A ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1997
From: Frank Smidler <smidler(at)dcwi.com>
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
> > Does anyone have an option, either good or bad, about using vision microsystems > for their engine monitoring insturments. I visited their booth at the big show > and was impressed with what it does. However, the RVers I hang with don't like > the idea of putting all their eggs in one basket. > > jeff What is the chance of the engine monitor and engine failing at the same time? Not very likely. If you loose your engine monitor you land as soon as possible with very little risk. An unsolisited comment, why spend the big bucks on Vision's system when you can get all the same information with a Grand Rapids system at a lot less bucks. It doesn't have as fancy of a display but it is very functional. Frank Smidler RV-6, working on finishing kit ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1997
From: "John M. Denman" <mikedenman(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Attitude gyro
Maybe this issue is already settled but... While I was at Oshkosh this year I asked the Sigma Tek folks about this eight degree tilted panel issue that had been talked about on this list and its effect on the attitude gyro. To summarize his reply; 1. They can sell you a gyro adjusted to any angle you want ie. 1 degree, 2 degrees, 6 degrees, 15 degrees etc. 2. Any qualified instrument shop can also "adjust" these gyros to whatever tilt you want. 3. It doesn't make any difference to the gyro how it is adjusted, only to the presentation. He also mentioned that you shouldn't let a gyro set for long periods of time because it is bad for the bearings. He defined "long" periods as 6 months or more. Apparently the bearings are sealed but the oil will collect in the bottom of the bearing housing over time, leaving the balls in the top of the bearing housing unlubercated at the instant of start up. Mike Denman RV6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1997
From: mauser(at)claris.com (Richard Chandler)
Subject: Re: Attitude gyro
> He also mentioned that you shouldn't let a gyro set for long periods > of time because it is bad for the bearings. He defined "long" periods > as 6 months or more. Apparently the bearings are sealed but the oil > will collect in the bottom of the bearing housing over time, leaving > the balls in the top of the bearing housing unlubercated at the instant > of start up. Flip it over every month? -- Richard Chandler RV-6: Garage bought and being finished, saving for tools and tail kit. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 1997
From: jim jewell <jjewell(at)okanagan.net>
Subject: Re: Dropping objects
> >Listers, > >At a reduced power setting and airspeed, can the tip-up canopy on an RV-6A >be opened enough to drop objects during flight? As long as persons or >property on the ground aren't in danger, the FAA allows this. I'm getting >rather close to flying and was hoping that something the size of a new roll >of toilet paper could be dropped. "Others" who have done this in a 152 say >it can be real fun to cut the resulting streamer with the wings :))) > >Scott Gesele N506RV (At airport, wings and tail on) > > >hello scott i suspect that you will discover a better use for the tp if you try opening your canopy in flight. :-) ! > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > | --- | > | Please aggressivly edit quoted text on a followup posting! | > +-- --+ > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Btinn(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 09, 1997
Subject: Re: elevator v-blocks
Chris, You implied that the prepunched kits should possibly eliminate the need for accurate jigs. I disagree. My empennage was purchased before prepunching was available from Van's (BPP), but my wing kit was one of the earlier prepunched wings. It is true that the skins have been punched very precisely, but those skins must be drilled to framework skeleton members that are not punched - unless I have really missed something in my wing and fuselage kits. It is the alignment of the holes drilled in the skins AND the underlying framework that will determine whether or not the pieces being constructed will be true. You can still get a severely warped control surface or wing while using prepunched skins if the drilling is not done while the frame AND skin are straight. This would dictate to me that a good jig is still very necessary. Keep on building those straight jigs and you can still have them mounted as trophies later if you want, but you are also more likely to have a straight airplane, which is a far more important trophy. Bob Tinnell Salem, OR RV-6A wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ShelbyRV6A(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 09, 1997
Subject: Re: Attitude gyro
That was the suggestion of the Sigma-tek rep at Oshkosh(flip it periodically). Not optimum because the gyros don't actually spin up(which is the only way the bearings actually get lubricated). Shelby in Nashville RV6A 200hp ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 1997
From: spjohnsn(at)ix.netcom.com (Stephen Paul Johnson)
Subject: Re: RV-8 H-stab & jig size?
Kevin wrote: > >I also would appreciate a list of wood sizes and length needed to build the >jig. I want to get any extra wood I need now so it can be as dry as >possible when the jig goes together. > Kevin, congrats on the tail kit purchase. I don't know if the instructions have been updated, but you will need the vertical posts about 113" apart for the wing jig, so I would build the jig for the HS using that dimension for the crosspiece. Steve Johnson RV-8 #80121 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 08, 1997
From: Dave Barnhart <barnhart(at)a.crl.com>
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
jlock(at)centuryinter.net wrote: > >Does anyone have an option, either good or bad, about using vision >microsystems >for their engine monitoring insturments. I visited their booth at the big >show >and was impressed with what it does. However, the RVers I hang with don't >like >the idea of putting all their eggs in one basket. Jeff: That is a consideration. A friend with a Lancair *did* suffer a failure of his VM1000 one day, but he was on the ground. Even so, his airplane was out of commission for several days. On the other hand, I'm using the RMI microMOnitor, so I've got the same exposure. Best Regards, Dave Barnhart rv-6 sn 23744 N601DB ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 1997
From: "John M. Denman" <mikedenman(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Attitude gyro
Richard Chandler wrote: > > > > He also mentioned that you shouldn't let a gyro set for long periods > > of time because it is bad for the bearings. He defined "long" periods > > as 6 months or more. Apparently the bearings are sealed but the oil > > will collect in the bottom of the bearing housing over time, leaving > > the balls in the top of the bearing housing unlubercated at the instant > > of start up. > > Flip it over every month? > > -- > Richard Chandler > RV-6: Garage bought and being finished, saving for tools and tail kit. > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > | --- | > | Please aggressivly edit quoted text on a followup posting! | > +-- --+ The bearing issue came up when I said I was close to buying a attitude gyro but that it would be awhile till the plane was flying. The man from Sigma Tek said if I bought the attitude gyro early then I should be aware of the potential problem. He suggested hooking it up to a vaccuum source once a month and letting it "spin up". I'm not sure "flipping it over" would be effective. The bearings are very precision and probably very sensitive to this type of problem. Mike Denman RV6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 1997
From: "r.acker" <r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Cleaveland Tool web page update
>Not to start a debate, but Acrobat is a really bad to to use for things that >are only meant to be read on a computer. Richard, I've repetitively seen messages like this one cause people/suppliers going a very long extra mile to help us builders out, to say farewell with a single finger salute. There is an on-line html catalog available. For the 98.6743% of us with Acrobat capability who don't mind the hardship of unzipping a file, we can download and print the catalog with MUCH better picture quality and formatting than html, and save Cleaveland the printing and mailing costs. If you don't have Acrobat and want the pictures, just call 'em up and order a catalog. Cleaveland, my hats off to you for a great addition...keep the Acrobat format on-line! There...vented...sorry. Rob Acker / r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com / RV-6 Quickbuild in slowbuild mode... :( ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 1997
From: "r.acker" <r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
>An unsolisited comment, why spend the big bucks on Vision's system when >you can get all the same information with a Grand Rapids system at a lot >less bucks. It doesn't have as fancy of a display but it is very >functional. The Grand Rapids lacks many of the features of the Vision, therefore less bucks (a few important examples are scanning of all cht's and egt's, lean mode, shock cool alert, trend learning capability, etc.). It does have all the basics (and a great price/performance ratio), is cheaper than analog equivalents, and it has scanning capabilities. Rob Acker / r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com / RV-6 Quickbuild in slowbuild mode... :( ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 1997
Subject: RV-6/6A Fuselage jig for sale
From: tcastella(at)juno.com (Anthony J Castellano)
I just removed the fuselage from my Stephen Frey steel fuselage jig. It is for sale for $900 or best offer. I will also include the firewall and F606 stiffener pieces and any other things I can think of that I won't need anymore. I have a wood wing and empenage jig that I will include if the buyer is interested. Please respond to, Tony Castellano tcastella(at)juno.com Hopewell Junction, NY RV-6 (fuselage now out of jig) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 1997
From: "Scott M. Kuebler" <keebs(at)buffnet.net>
Subject: Re: RV-8 H-stab & jig size?
Kevin & Theresa Horton wrote: > > I also would appreciate a list of wood sizes and length needed to build the > jig. I want to get any extra wood I need now so it can be as dry as > possible when the jig goes together. We have two RV-6 kits being built in the same hanger. We bought all the wood for two jigs (4x4's), one jig was constructed right away (while the wood was still damp), and the wood for the second jig was left to dry. The wood for the first jig dryed while it was securely bolted, screwed & metal straped in place. It dryed very straight The wood for the second jig dryed while laying on the floor. It is now severly twisted, and has become scrap. So, my advice to you is don't buy your wood until you are ready to assemble the jig, and happy building. Scott RV-6 (moving on to the VS) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6Russ(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 09, 1997
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
Jeff I have the VM 1000 in my RV6A (now 150 hrs). I like it - it shows you a lot of info in a glance and saves panel space. (weight saving is debatable) I do have separate fuel guages and I presently have a separate oil press guage (meant to be temporary because of another problem) The system uses a lot of sensors but they are relatively easy to install and all readings are very accurate. The unit is set up for your engine at the factory - so it has all the paramaters built in for you engine. The fuel flow transducer must be installed exactly as per instructions! There are lots of nice features. I would not spring for the annunciator lights - I have them and they are redundant and require an immense amount of wiring - wish I had never seen them now. With separate fuel guages I can't think of anything that would be critial to flight if the system went belly up in flight. Display is easy to read in all lighting conditions. Good luck on your project Russ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 1997
From: lottmc(at)datastar.net (Michael C. Lott)
Subject: rv-4 vents
Does anyone know a good spot for some nasa type vents on an rv-4? I was thinking of putting them righ below the canopy skirt on the right side of the fuselage. That would be the easiest and flattest area, but I wasn't sure if the low pressure from the wing would extend that far up, or not. Does anyone here know, or does anyone know of a different type vent with a built in adjustment that would fit on a curved surface that I could install in the canopy skirt itself? Thanks for any advice. Michael ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "mcomeaux" <mcomeaux(at)cmc.net>
Subject: 6A QB
Date: Aug 09, 1997
Can one support the fuselage by the wood they insert for shipping or set it up on saw horses on blankets? When I say wood I mean where the spar goes through. Mike Comeaux 6A QB ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: pitot tube fitting /
From: less_drag(at)juno.com (JAMES E AYERS)
Date: Aug 10, 1997
writes: > >Dear all, > >1. pitot tube fitting (PART NO. AN832 - 4D) > >In Van's drawing No. 20 for RV6A, we canot work out which way round >the tube fitting should go. One end of the fitting has 2 lots of threads, >the other end has one lot of thread. Which end should go inside the wing ? > >Best regards >Kamy Cheng >University of Western Australia - RV6A I mounted the fitting on a U channel inside the wing with just the tube sticking through the wing skin. That is, there is no fitting on the outside of the wing. Just make sure you have access to it from the aileron access cutout, or mount it on its own access cover. (One of these days I'm going to run a second tube thru the wing for the static line. Then I can mount my 1/8" diameter stainless steel pitot/static tube in the wing.) Jim Ayers LOM M332A engine Ivoprop VP Prop Sportcraft Antennas RV-3 N47RV Maroon Marauder Less_Drag(at)juno.com Thousand Oaks, California USA http://member.aol.com/lesdrag/rv3.htm http://member.aol.com/lesdrag/Ivoprop.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 10, 1997
Subject: Re: Multiport Fuel Valves for IOs
If some of you are looking for high quality fuel selector valves that simultaneously switch supply and return ports (for injected applications or just those that want to plumb a return to the supply tank for breaking vapor lock) see the following web site: http://www.olympic.net/innov/fm.html Apparently many of these valves are already used in local RVs. Spread the word. -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV4131rb(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 10, 1997
Subject: Fwd: FAA Report!
<< Excerpt from recent FAA accident report Eye witness statement: Aircraft: Cessna 172 Pilot: 30 years old, CFI, IR Fatalities: None Date of Accident: 7/10/82 Witness: Line attendant at airport. Pilot came to airport at 9 AM 10 July 1982. Line boy reports padlock on his hanger door was so rusted he had to break it off with a 10# ball-peen hammer. Also had to inflate all 3 tires and scrape pigeon droppings off wind screen. After several attempts to drain fuel strainers pilot finally got what looked like fuel out of the wing sumps. Couldn't get the oil dipstick out of the engine but said it was okay last time he looked. Engine started okay, ran rough for about 1/2 minute, then died. Then battery would not turn prop. Used battery cart and although starter was smoking real good, it finally started and the propwash blew the smoke away. Line boy offered to fuel airplane up but pilot said he was late for an appointment at a nearby airport. Said it wasn't far. Taxied about 1/2 way out to active runway and the engine stopped. Pushed it back to the fuel pumps and bought 3 gallons for the left wing tank. Started it again. This time, he was almost out to the runway when it quit again. Put a little rock under nose wheel; hand propped it; and was seen still trying to climb in the airplane as it went across the runway. Finally got in it; blew out the right tire trying to stop before the cement plant. When he taxied back in to have the tire changed, he also had the line boy hit the right wing with 3 gallons of gas. Witness, who saw the take off, said the aircraft lined up and took off to the north. Takeoff looked fairly normal, nose came up about 300 ft. down the runway. At midfield nose came down. Engine coughed twice then cut power and applied the brakes which made both doors fly open and a big fat brown book fell out on the runway and released probably a million little white pages with diagrams on them. Looked like sort of a snow storm. After several real loud runups at the end, he turned her around and took off in the other direction going south into the wind. Only this time he horsed her off at the end and pulled her up real steep like one of them jet fighter planes to about 300 feet then the engine quit! Did a sort of a slow turn back toward the airport kinda like that Art School guy and about 30 ft. off the McDonald's cafe she started roaring again. He did sort of a high speed pass down the runway; put the flaps down to full and that sucker went up like he was going to do an Immelman! The engine quit again and he turned right and I thought he was coming right through the front window of the F.B.O.; but he pulled her up; went through the TV antenna and the little rooster with the NSE&W things over the building then bounced the main wheels off the roof of 3 different cars in the lot, a Porsche, a Mercedes and Dr. Brown's new El Dorado. When he bounced off the El Dorado the engine roared to life and he got her flying. Came around toward the runway and set her down once on the overrun, once on the runway and once in the grass beside the runway. He taxied into the ramp, shut her down and ordered 3 more gallons of gas. Said it was for safety's sake. Then he asked where the phone booth was as he had to call his student and tell him he was going to be a little late. Fly safe ya'll! >> --------------------- From: DHeule(at)compuserve.com (Dane Heule, Colorado) Date: 97-08-09 17:28:18 EDT Hay Pard! Don't know where this will reach you but thought you ought to read this Accident Report. Excerpt from recent FAA accident report Eye witness statement: Aircraft: Cessna 172 Pilot: 30 years old, CFI, IR Fatalities: None Date of Accident: 7/10/82 Witness: Line attendant at airport. Pilot came to airport at 9 AM 10 July 1982. Line boy reports padlock on his hanger door was so rusted he had to break it off with a 10# ball-peen hammer. Also had to inflate all 3 tires and scrape pigeon droppings off wind screen. After several attempts to drain fuel strainers pilot finally got what looked like fuel out of the wing sumps. Couldn't get the oil dipstick out of the engine but said it was okay last time he looked. Engine started okay, ran rough for about 1/2 minute, then died. Then battery would not turn prop. Used battery cart and although starter was smoking real good, it finally started and the propwash blew the smoke away. Line boy offered to fuel airplane up but pilot said he was late for an appointment at a nearby airport. Said it wasn't far. Taxied about 1/2 way out to active runway and the engine stopped. Pushed it back to the fuel pumps and bought 3 gallons for the left wing tank. Started it again. This time, he was almost out to the runway when it quit again. Put a little rock under nose wheel; hand propped it; and was seen still trying to climb in the airplane as it went across the runway. Finally got in it; blew out the right tire trying to stop before the cement plant. When he taxied back in to have the tire changed, he also had the line boy hit the right wing with 3 gallons of gas. Witness, who saw the take off, said the aircraft lined up and took off to the north. Takeoff looked fairly normal, nose came up about 300 ft. down the runway. At midfield nose came down. Engine coughed twice then cut power and applied the brakes which made both doors fly open and a big fat brown book fell out on the runway and released probably a million little white pages with diagrams on them. Looked like sort of a snow storm. After several real loud runups at the end, he turned her around and took off in the other direction going south into the wind. Only this time he horsed her off at the end and pulled her up real steep like one of them jet fighter planes to about 300 feet then the engine quit! Did a sort of a slow turn back toward the airport kinda like that Art School guy and about 30 ft. off the McDonald's cafe she started roaring again. He did sort of a high speed pass down the runway; put the flaps down to full and that sucker went up like he was going to do an Immelman! The engine quit again and he turned right and I thought he was coming right through the front window of the F.B.O.; but he pulled her up; went through the TV antenna and the little rooster with the NSE&W things over the building then bounced the main wheels off the roof of 3 different cars in the lot, a Porsche, a Mercedes and Dr. Brown's new El Dorado. When he bounced off the El Dorado the engine roared to life and he got her flying. Came around toward the runway and set her down once on the overrun, once on the runway and once in the grass beside the runway. He taxied into the ramp, shut her down and ordered 3 more gallons of gas. Said it was for safety's sake. Then he asked where the phone booth was as he had to call his student and tell him he was going to be a little late. Fly safe ya'll! Dane ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rvbildr(at)juno.com
Date: Aug 10, 1997
Subject: Oshkosh Statistics
Here's one more Oshkosh report with some rough numbers: I took notes on only 63 RV-6's and came up with the following: Engines- Lyc 180hp/200hp 50% Lyc 150 hp 25% Lyc 160 hp 25% Props- Wood 50% Metal 50%(of the metal ones, Hartzell far outnumbered Sensenich) Average empty weight- 1060 " gross " -1677 It was truly RV heaven. Don't mean to ignore you "4" and "3" types, but I'm building a 6. Thanks for all the hints from the folks I talked with. Mal N698MH instrument panel & rudder trim ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1997
From: Curt Reimer <Curt_Reimer(at)mbnet.mb.ca>
Subject: Re: Cracked Canopy part II
aol.com!RV6160hp(at)matronics.com wrote: > > > > But now I got the the crack................. Flaming I highly recommend, For what it's worth, I have to comment on this. I have a good friend who has operated a plexiglas fabrication shop for 15 years. He is most definitely an expert and that is why I asked for his advice before beginning the canopy installation on my RV-6. His most emphatic point was, DO NOT FLAME THE EDGES! He said that while it appears to work well and is fast and easy, you are just begging for trouble. Heating the edge of the plexi causes MAJOR stresses to build up that almost inevitably will lead to cracks developing during fabrication or later on through vibration, flight loads, etc. I tried flaming a piece of scrap and, wow it sure is fast and easy and give the appearance of a perfectly finished edge. The reality is though, that flaming is apparently used by only the shoddiest of plastic fabricators. I apologise to those who have flamed their canopy edges. I'm sure you aren't getting much pleasure out of reading this, and my friend could be wrong, I suppose, but I trust his opinion. Incidentally, yes of course the canopy is heated up to do the initial bubble forming at the factory, but it is heated as a single piece, so it is normalized and local stresses don't develop. If you can afford the edge distance, you might consider refinishing your edges using the techniques described below. If you machine away a bit of the flamed edge, you will be eliminating at least some of the accumulated stress. (I have not tried this, so practice on scrap first) Now, I'll pass on my friend's advice on how to properly finish your canopy. Again, this is the advice of an experienced pro, adapted to the difficulty of working with a large curved piece. My friend is a bit of a perfectionist, so perhaps some of this is overkill. Not knowing any better, I did what he told me to. 1. Although Van's recommends the cutoff wheel for cutting the canopy to shape, you must be careful to minimize the heat build up. This goes for all plexi work. Don't let it get hot or you will cause stress build ups (and potential cracking). I recommend George Orndorfs method of using many low speed passes rather than a single high speed pass. Use the air drill rather than a die grinder, since it has a gear drive and has much more torque at low cutting speeds. The die grinder at slow speed is gutless and just jams all the time. How the pros do it: Straight cuts are made on a table saw with a multi toothed (like 80 or so) carbide blade. Curved cuts are done with a router, either hand held or table type. In general, plexi should be MACHINED, not ground or melted. Obviously you can't cut your RV canopy on a table saw, ( and don't even think of using a reciprocating saw) so the cut off wheel method is reasonable provided you keep the speed (heat) down and make lots of passes. 2. To finish the edges, I recommend a scraper blade. Avery's now carries these, but I ended up making my own out of a piece of .040 4130. Use a round file to cut a half moon shaped "bite" with nice sharp edges. Make the cut out at least 1/8 wider than the plexi, and round off the sharp corners, otherwise the corners will catch and scratch the plexi. Use the scraper like a draw knife and scrape and round the plexi edges until all cut marks are eliminated. Sand lightly and buff with a small buffing wheel on a SLOW die grinder using red buffing compound. You will have a perfect transparent edge that is worth the trouble. It takes all of maybe 5 minutes to scrape, sand and buff a 24 inch section of canopy edge. A couple of hours work will leave a perfect canopy that is as resistant to cracking as can be done. How the pros do it: Again, they use a router table or joiner with a round over bit, followed by light sanding and buffing. I don't own a router, and it would probably be awkward to use on the canopy, but the scraping is fast and easy. 3. If the cut off wheel slipped, like it did to me, and left some extra gouges or scratches near your canopy edges, these should be eliminated. I used a small rounded cutting bit on my die grinder, at low speed, and machined away the scratches. Follow up with course, medium and fine sandpaper, and final buffing. This might sound like a lot of work, but the plexi is so soft that it goes very quickly. 4. Don't ever use windex or any ammonia based cleaner on your plexi. THis will again cause stress buildup and potential cracking due to some kind of chemical reaction. This might not show up immediately, but it is asking for trouble. Rule of thumb: plexi is not very forgiving: 3 strikes and your out: Flame the edges (strike 1), use ammonia (strike 2) and flex the part (strike 3 - crack). If you only make one mistake, you can sometimes get away with it. 5. Do use plexiglas drill bits whenever you are drilling plexi. I made one of my own by grinding a standard bit according to the instructions from Van's but the special bits from Avery work much better. When drilling though multiple aluminum-plexi-aluminum laminations (like the side skirts) you need to change bits, as the plexi bits won't work on aluminum. Pilot drill the side skirt off the airplane, then reassemble the side skirts and use a plexi drill to drill partway through the plexi. Remove the side skirts and use the plexi drill to finish drilling all the holes through the plexi. (The plexi bit has a long point that will bottom out on the inner side skirt if you try to drill all the way through the assembly) Then reassemble the skirt and use a standard bit to drill though the holes in the outer skirt and plexi, into the inner skirt. Finally, position the UHMW screw anchor strip and pilot drill this strip in assembly. If you try to cut corners with this operation by not using the proper bits, you might get away with it, but you might not. I have found that by knowing the right way to work with this stuff, I no longer have any fear whatsoever about cracking my canopy (knock wood). I hope I havn't ruined anyone's day, but I felt I had to pass on this advice on working with plexi. regards, Curt Reimer RV-6 doing canopy side skirts. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1997
From: Finn Lassen <finnlass(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Cracked Canopy part II
Curt Reimer wrote: > Then reassemble the skirt and use a standard bit to drill though the > holes in the outer skirt and plexi, Sounds like asking for trouble enlarging the hole in plexi with a normal bit?! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1997
From: Denny Harjehausen <retflygtiger(at)proaxis.com>
Subject: Re: Cracked Canopy part II
> (snip) >I hope I havn't ruined anyone's day, but I felt I had to pass on this advice on working with plexi. > (snip) Curt, you sure didn't ruin my day! Thanks for going to the work of posting this, many of us will need this advise soon. Have a good one! Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH Fuselage-top side Lebanon, OR ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JamesCone(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 10, 1997
Subject: Headsets for sale
My wife bought me an ANR headset for my birthday. I liked it and let her try it. She liked it too. I bought her one so I could get mine back. The result of all this gift giving is that I have two very nice Sigtronics top of the line stereo headsets that I don't need, one with individual volume controls and cloth ear seal covers, and the other one with Oregon Aero Softtop Headband and Softseal earcup cushions. They will also work as mono with an adaptor plug from Radio Shack. Total value is over $500. at today's prices. I will sell both and throw in a carying case for $200. I will even throw in a push to talk switch that came with the headsets if I can find it. I have never used it because my previous plane didn't need it and neither does my RV. I'm sure that it is around my hangar somewhere. Earliest phone call or E-mail to me gets them and I will pay the shipping. Jim Cone jamescone(at)aol.com 422 Savannah Ridge Drive St. Charles, MO 63303 (314) 928-8703 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: winterland(at)rkymtnhi.com
Date: Aug 10, 1997
Subject: Re: Dropping objects
> Until you get it in the Carb and the engine quits,(been there done that, > see my homepage) or in the cooling intake and you burn up a cylinder.... Or I tend to agree. Chasing toilet paper has always been great fun in my ultralight, but i don't think its what the RV does best. Andy Gold RV6A N-5060 flying ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1997
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)navix.net>
Subject: Junk mail
I wonder if any others on the list have all of a sudden started receiving a lot of junk E-mail? Are these people pulling our addresses off of the list or, is it because I posted a couple of times to a couple of newsgroups. I've received several unsolicited E-mails that are quite large and take a long time to download. How does one combat this annoyance? I notice in some of the newsgroups that people have inserted extra characters in their E-mail addresses. I guess this would cause a bounced message if a spammer were to send to a modified address. If I modify my E-mail address to: BSkinner*nospam*@navix.net when my real address is BSkinner(at)navix.net, will this stop the spam? Sorry to bother the list with this but I know there are a lot of computer gurus on the list and list traffic is a little slow, lately, anyway. You can E-mail me off list and if anyone else is interested in the answers to the above, I'll E-mail the answers that I receive to you off-list so as not to clog the list. Thanks, Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)navix.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1997
From: lottmc(at)datastar.net (Michael C. Lott)
Subject: canopy don'ts
I am on the other end of the spectrum. I know how to mess up a canopy. If you are going to lay up wet fiberglass for the front windshield fairing, do not trust 2 or 3 layers of standard saran wrap type plastic, the thicker plastic that is like what comes on your sheet aluminum, or a thick layer or two of good car wax to prevent the resin from damaging your plexiglass. I tried all of these first, because other people told me they had used them. Enough resin seeped through to leave a very thin film around the edge of the canopy where the fairing was going to be. Other than looking bad, nothing happened for 3 or 4 days. Then a bunch of small cracks developed all around where the resin had contacted the plexiglass. Still not touching it, the next day more cracks became evident so I figured I better do something. I had a 1 inch and a 2 inch crack I had to stop drill. There were about twenty hairline cracks on the edge about 1/8 inch long. I carefully filed down the entire front edge about 1/8 inch to get rid of all but 3 or 4 small cracks that I ended up stop drilling. No more cracks have developed since I did this. I have tapped on it and twisted it a little bit to make sure it would be okay, then mounted it on the frame and fully attached it with 6/32 stainless screws, very lightly torqued. That was 3 days ago and no more cracks have developed and only a little of the damaged plexi can be seen. Maybe it will be okay. There were no cracks at all anywhere else on the entire canopy. I hope my stupid mistakes stop someone else from wasting their time, too. Oh, I ended up using thick tin foil to cover the plexi. I don't know why I didn't think of that first. Michael. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1997
From: Gil Alexander <gila(at)flash.net>
Subject: Re: Cracked Canopy part II
<33EE1D11.322C(at)mbnet.mb.ca> >Curt Reimer wrote: >> Then reassemble the skirt and use a standard bit to drill though the > holes in the outer skirt and plexi, > Finn Lassen wrote: >Sounds like asking for trouble enlarging the hole in plexi with a normal >bit?! > I have found that a UniBit in a cordless drill (for it's slow speed) works well for enlarging holes past a #30 size. This bit fits in with the 'machining' recommendation of Curt Reimer's previous posting. A combination of layers of plexiglas and aluminum would be no problem for this bit. It works with more of a scraping action than a cutting as it enlarges. The "single hole" countersink bits are also good for plexiglas for the same reason. ... Gil (I like my UniBit) Alexander finish kit, still on hold ... ------------------------------------ RV6A, #20701, finishing kit "REPLY" sends to entire RV-list mailto:gila(at)flash.net to reply privately ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1997
From: Rick and Barbara Osgood <randbosgood(at)sprintmail.com>
Subject: Aileron mounting bracket
Hello all... I am in need of some quick advice. I am working on the left wing aileron on my 6A. The mounting brackets W-613 and W-614 are a little wider than the rear spar and as rough fitted, will not line up within the template very well. I am thinking that the transition from the main skin(top) to the aileron skin should be a smooth line. How much of the brackets did you all have to trim and on which end..?? Any other tips in this area would be appreciaited. Final note: My kit is a little older if it makes a difference. TIA Rick Osgood RV6A Wings - well left side anyway ;) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1997
From: Scott Gesele <scottg(at)icsnet.com>
Subject: Re: canopy don'ts
What resin did you use (polyester or epoxy)? Scott Gesele ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1997
From: John Ammeter <ammeterj(at)seanet.com>
Subject: Re: Junk mail
> > I wonder if any others on the list have all of a sudden started receiving >a lot of junk E-mail? You can E-mail me off list and if anyone else is interested in the answers to >the above Hey, I'm interested NOW. I, too, am getting far more than I want of SPAM. I even got an e-mail from some Lawyer telling ME to cease and desist from complaining about any SPAM their client may have sent; I didn't complain about any spam but still got that 'cease and desist' email. Did anyone else get an email from 'Russell L. Allyn, Attorney at Law', khskllp(at)aol.com, telling them to stop complaining about their clients 'protected activity under the laws of free speech'?? John Ammeter ammeterj(at)seanet.com 3233 NE 95th St Seattle WA, 98115 USA 206-525-5445 RV-6 N16JA First flight August 1990 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1997
From: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Junk mail
Bob Skinner wrote: > > > I wonder if any others on the list have all of a sudden started > receiving > a lot of junk E-mail? Bob I know I would also like to know the info from some of the computer experts. What really pisses me off is when I get junk mail telling me how to send baulk junk mail. There ought to be a law against using a phony email address if sending junk mail. -- Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS First flight July 14, 1989 :-) Hillsboro, OR jsflyrv(at)ix.netcom.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1997
From: lottmc(at)datastar.net (Michael C. Lott)
Subject: Re: canopy don'ts
I used whatever resin comes with the fiberglass repair kits. I'm sure it wasn't epoxy. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dralle(at)matronics.com (Matt Dralle 510-606-1001)
Date: Aug 11, 1997
Subject: Starrett 737 SPC Output...
[Listers- I realize that this topic isn't really about RVs, but I posted the message below to rec.crafts.metalworking and didn't really get any response. I know there are a couple of metal workers on this List so it seemed like a good crowd to ask... :-) -Matt] Subject: Starrett 737 SPC Output Specification - Help. I have a Starrett 737 vertical scale on the knee of my vertical mill and would like to interface its SPC digital output to a small, single axis display unit manufactured by Mitutoyo (Series 572). The Mitutoyo display unit came with a really nice technical spec on the SPC data format (both protocol and electrical information) that it is expecting. The Starrett, on the other hand, came with a useless sheet of paper on how to press its front panel buttons - no documentation whatsoever on the SPC. Does anyone have some technical information on the SPC port on the Starrett 737? I am in need of the following bits of information: # Pin out (Both the square 4 pin on the unit and the 6 pin on the connecting cable.) # Electrical characteristics (hi/lo levels, timings, etc.) # Output protocol specification. Any information you could email or FAX my way would be most helpful. Thanks, Matt Dralle -- Matt G. Dralle | Matronics | P.O. Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 510-606-1001 Voice | 510-606-6281 FAX | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ W.W.W. | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dralle(at)matronics.com (Matt Dralle 510-606-1001)
Date: Aug 11, 1997
Subject: Re: Junk mail
>-------------- > > I wonder if any others on the list have all of a sudden started receiving >a lot of junk E-mail? Are these people pulling our addresses off of the >list or, is it because I posted a couple of times to a couple of newsgroups. >I've received several unsolicited E-mails that are quite large and take a >long time to download. > > <...snip...> > >Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)navix.net >-------------- Listers- I too have noticed an increase in the amount of SPAM email I've been receiving over the last few months. Be aware that the information you have configured into your web browser can generally be captured by the web sites you visit - information such as your email address, etc. As Bob mentioned, posting to news groups is also a great way to get added to SPAM lists. I don't expect there is anything special going on with the recent increase in junk mail; I just think the 'quick-buck' people are just getting online. What next - the physic-network on the Inter-network...? -Oh, great. I just went through last month's US Mail junk-mail (I go though it once a month when I do my bills), and excluding the monthly publications I receive on purpose, I ended up hauling about 10 lbs of useless crap out to the trash. What a waste. At least with Internet SPAM, innocent trees don't have to die... Finally, I want to assure everyone on the Lists that under no circumstances do I sell or release to rv-list and zenith-list email addresses for profit. It is possible, however, to download the current member list using special messages to the mail list software. This avilability is fairly obscure would unlikely be exploited by SPAMer trash. I do, however, reserve the right to use the Lists as necessary to shamelessly promote the Matronics' product line... :-) Matt Dralle RV-List & Zenith-List Admin. -- Matt G. Dralle | Matronics | P.O. Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 510-606-1001 Voice | 510-606-6281 FAX | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ W.W.W. | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1997
From: <MAILER-DAEMON(at)nike.com>
Subject: Undeliverable Message
Subject: Re: RV-List: Multiport Fuel Valves for IOs Message not delivered to recipients below. Press F1 for help with VNM error codes. VNM3047: CanstarMailRouter@Services@WHQ VNM3077: Jon Otto*@NetEng@ISTechDev VNM3047: RosenbluthMailRouter@Services@WHQ VNM3046: ASIAN_Agent@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: kevin@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: Mack@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: RCon@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3046: RoboCop@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: robocop99@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3046: SAV@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: STDA@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3046: Surveys(at)SynapseSystems.COM VNM3047: Vpman@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3048: Craig Engel@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: Don Brown@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: John Curry@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: John Grable@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: John Haaland@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: Kimberly Crandall@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: Mack Kigada@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3046: Mark Sharinghousen@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: NAN@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: Terry Bingham@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3046: Vilma Villarama@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3046: RoboCop01@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop02@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop03@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop04@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop05@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop06@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3047: test@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3048: Test Dummy@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3047: Test User3@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3048: Dummy account@SvrSupp@USRIT VNM3048: Mark Renteria@SvrSupp@USRIT VNM3047: Arthur_Svr@Services@WHQ VNM3047: Meridian01@Services@WHQ VNM3047: Utopia_Svr@Services@WHQ VNM3047 -- NO MAIL SERVICE SPECIFIED IN PROFILE Mail could not deliver the message because the appropriate SETMAIL command has not been entered in the recipient's user profile. Notify the recipient of this problem. The recipient's system administrator should verify that the user profile contains the appropriate SETMAIL command and mail service name. If changes to the profile are made, the recipient must log out and then log in again before Mail can deliver the message. The sender can recover the message and forward it when the recipient's user profile problem has been resolved. If some of you are looking for high quality fuel selector valves that simultaneously switch supply and return ports (for injected applications or just those that want to plumb a return to the supply tank for breaking vapor lock) see the following web site: http://www.olympic.net/innov/fm.html Apparently many of these valves are already used in local RVs. Spread the word. -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1997
From: <Desktop=Services%SvrSupp%USRIT(at)nike.com> (desktop services)
Subject: Fwd: FAA Report!
Your message has been received by Server Support Services and will be processed by the next business day. Server Support Services 715-9333 ------------- Original Text >From aol.com!RV4131rb(at)matronics.com, on 8/10/97 2:44 AM: The original message was larger than the viewing area. It cannot be displayed as is. Therefore, it has been stored in the file `mail.txt'. Please view this file in order to read the message. Thank you. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1997
From: "Paul A. Rosales" <prosales(at)qnet.com>
Subject: Superior Air Parts, O-360?
For those who attended OSH, was there any new information on the rumored O-360 clone from Superior? I'm starting to think about engines and, as a mechanic hobbyist, it's always peeked my interest. Paul Rosales RV-6A Fuselage (1 skin away from coming out of the jig) Lancaster, CA ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1997
From: <MAILER-DAEMON(at)nike.com>
Subject: Undeliverable Message
charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: RV-List: pitot tube fitting / Message not delivered to recipients below. Press F1 for help with VNM error codes. VNM3047: CanstarMailRouter@Services@WHQ VNM3077: Jon Otto*@NetEng@ISTechDev VNM3047: RosenbluthMailRouter@Services@WHQ VNM3046: ASIAN_Agent@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: kevin@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: Mack@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: RCon@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3046: RoboCop@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: robocop99@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3046: SAV@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: STDA@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3046: Surveys(at)SynapseSystems.COM VNM3047: Vpman@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3048: Craig Engel@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: Don Brown@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: John Curry@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: John Grable@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: John Haaland@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: Kimberly Crandall@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: Mack Kigada@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3046: Mark Sharinghousen@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: NAN@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: Terry Bingham@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3046: Vilma Villarama@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3046: RoboCop01@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop02@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop03@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop04@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop05@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop06@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3047: test@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3048: Test Dummy@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3047: Test User3@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3048: Dummy account@SvrSupp@USRIT VNM3048: Mark Renteria@SvrSupp@USRIT VNM3047: Arthur_Svr@Services@WHQ VNM3047: Meridian01@Services@WHQ VNM3047: Utopia_Svr@Services@WHQ VNM3047 -- NO MAIL SERVICE SPECIFIED IN PROFILE Mail could not deliver the message because the appropriate SETMAIL command has not been entered in the recipient's user profile. Notify the recipient of this problem. The recipient's system administrator should verify that the user profile contains the appropriate SETMAIL command and mail service name. If changes to the profile are made, the recipient must log out and then log in again before Mail can deliver the message. The sender can recover the message and forward it when the recipient's user profile problem has been resolved. writes: > >Dear all, > >1. pitot tube fitting (PART NO. AN832 - 4D) > >In Van's drawing No. 20 for RV6A, we canot work out which way round >the tube fitting should go. One end of the fitting has 2 lots of threads, >the other end has one lot of thread. Which end should go inside the wing ? > >Best regards >Kamy Cheng >University of Western Australia - RV6A I mounted the fitting on a U channel inside the wing with just the tube sticking through the wing skin. That is, there is no fitting on the outside of the wing. Just make sure you have access to it from the aileron access cutout, or mount it on its own access cover. (One of these days I'm going to run a second tube thru the wing for the static line. Then I can mount my 1/8" diameter stainless steel pitot/static tube in the wing.) Jim Ayers LOM M332A engine Ivoprop VP Prop Sportcraft Antennas RV-3 N47RV Maroon Marauder Less_Drag(at)juno.com Thousand Oaks, California USA http://member.aol.com/lesdrag/rv3.htm http://member.aol.com/lesdrag/Ivoprop.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1997
From: <Desktop=Services%SvrSupp%USRIT(at)nike.com> (desktop services)
Subject: Re: Multiport Fuel Valves for IOs
Your message has been received by Server Support Services and will be processed by the next business day. Server Support Services 715-9333 ------------- Original Text >From aol.com!Vanremog(at)matronics.com, on 8/10/97 2:41 AM: If some of you are looking for high quality fuel selector valves that simultaneously switch supply and return ports (for injected applications or just those that want to plumb a return to the supply tank for breaking vapor lock) see the following web site: http://www.olympic.net/innov/fm.html Apparently many of these valves are already used in local RVs. Spread the word. -GV --+ | | "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | subject. | | | --+ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1997
From: <MAILER-DAEMON(at)nike.com>
Subject: Undeliverable Message
Subject: RV-List: Fwd: FAA Report! Message not delivered to recipients below. Press F1 for help with VNM error codes. VNM3047: CanstarMailRouter@Services@WHQ VNM3077: Jon Otto*@NetEng@ISTechDev VNM3047: RosenbluthMailRouter@Services@WHQ VNM3046: ASIAN_Agent@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: kevin@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: Mack@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: RCon@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3046: RoboCop@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: robocop99@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3046: SAV@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: STDA@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3046: Surveys(at)SynapseSystems.COM VNM3047: Vpman@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3048: Craig Engel@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: Don Brown@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: John Curry@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: John Grable@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: John Haaland@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: Kimberly Crandall@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: Mack Kigada@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3046: Mark Sharinghousen@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: NAN@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: Terry Bingham@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3046: Vilma Villarama@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3046: RoboCop01@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop02@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop03@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop04@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop05@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop06@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3047: test@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3048: Test Dummy@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3047: Test User3@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3048: Dummy account@SvrSupp@USRIT VNM3048: Mark Renteria@SvrSupp@USRIT VNM3047: Arthur_Svr@Services@WHQ VNM3047: Meridian01@Services@WHQ VNM3047: Utopia_Svr@Services@WHQ VNM3047 -- NO MAIL SERVICE SPECIFIED IN PROFILE Mail could not deliver the message because the appropriate SETMAIL command has not been entered in the recipient's user profile. Notify the recipient of this problem. The recipient's system administrator should verify that the user profile contains the appropriate SETMAIL command and mail service name. If changes to the profile are made, the recipient must log out and then log in again before Mail can deliver the message. The sender can recover the message and forward it when the recipient's user profile problem has been resolved. ---------------------- Original Message Follows ---------------------- The original message was larger than the viewing area. It cannot be displayed as is. Therefore, it has been stored in the file `mail.txt'. Please view this file in order to read the message. Thank you. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1997
From: <Desktop=Services%SvrSupp%USRIT(at)nike.com> (desktop services)
Subject: Re: pitot tube fitting /
charset=US-ASCII Your message has been received by Server Support Services and will be processed by the next business day. Server Support Services 715-9333 ------------- Original Text >From juno.com!less_drag(at)matronics.com (JAMES E AYERS), on 8/10/97 1:29 AM: writes: > >Dear all, > >1. pitot tube fitting (PART NO. AN832 - 4D) > >In Van's drawing No. 20 for RV6A, we canot work out which way round >the tube fitting should go. One end of the fitting has 2 lots of threads, >the other end has one lot of thread. Which end should go inside the wing ? > >Best regards >Kamy Cheng >University of Western Australia - RV6A I mounted the fitting on a U channel inside the wing with just the tube sticking through the wing skin. That is, there is no fitting on the outside of the wing. Just make sure you have access to it from the aileron access cutout, or mount it on its own access cover. (One of these days I'm going to run a second tube thru the wing for the static line. Then I can mount my 1/8" diameter stainless steel pitot/static tube in the wing.) Jim Ayers LOM M332A engine Ivoprop VP Prop Sportcraft Antennas RV-3 N47RV Maroon Marauder Less_Drag(at)juno.com Thousand Oaks, California USA http://member.aol.com/lesdrag/rv3.htm http://member.aol.com/lesdrag/Ivoprop.htm --+ | | "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | subject. | | | --+ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1997
From: <MAILER-DAEMON(at)nike.com>
Subject: Undeliverable Message
Subject: RV-List: Oshkosh Statistics Message not delivered to recipients below. Press F1 for help with VNM error codes. VNM3047: CanstarMailRouter@Services@WHQ VNM3077: Jon Otto*@NetEng@ISTechDev VNM3047: RosenbluthMailRouter@Services@WHQ VNM3046: ASIAN_Agent@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: kevin@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: Mack@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: RCon@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3046: RoboCop@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: robocop99@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3046: SAV@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: STDA@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3046: Surveys(at)SynapseSystems.COM VNM3047: Vpman@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3048: Craig Engel@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: Don Brown@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: John Curry@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: John Grable@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: John Haaland@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: Kimberly Crandall@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: Mack Kigada@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3046: Mark Sharinghousen@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: NAN@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: Terry Bingham@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3046: Vilma Villarama@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3046: RoboCop01@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop02@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop03@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop04@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop05@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop06@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3047: test@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3048: Test Dummy@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3047: Test User3@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3048: Dummy account@SvrSupp@USRIT VNM3048: Mark Renteria@SvrSupp@USRIT VNM3047: Arthur_Svr@Services@WHQ VNM3047: Meridian01@Services@WHQ VNM3047: Utopia_Svr@Services@WHQ VNM3047 -- NO MAIL SERVICE SPECIFIED IN PROFILE Mail could not deliver the message because the appropriate SETMAIL command has not been entered in the recipient's user profile. Notify the recipient of this problem. The recipient's system administrator should verify that the user profile contains the appropriate SETMAIL command and mail service name. If changes to the profile are made, the recipient must log out and then log in again before Mail can deliver the message. The sender can recover the message and forward it when the recipient's user profile problem has been resolved. Here's one more Oshkosh report with some rough numbers: I took notes on only 63 RV-6's and came up with the following: Engines- Lyc 180hp/200hp 50% Lyc 150 hp 25% Lyc 160 hp 25% Props- Wood 50% Metal 50%(of the metal ones, Hartzell far outnumbered Sensenich) Average empty weight- 1060 " gross " -1677 It was truly RV heaven. Don't mean to ignore you "4" and "3" types, but I'm building a 6. Thanks for all the hints from the folks I talked with. Mal N698MH instrument panel & rudder trim ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 10, 1997
From: <MAILER-DAEMON(at)nike.com>
Subject: Undeliverable Message
Subject: RV-List: Headsets for sale Message not delivered to recipients below. Press F1 for help with VNM error codes. VNM3047: CanstarMailRouter@Services@WHQ VNM3077: Jon Otto*@NetEng@ISTechDev VNM3047: RosenbluthMailRouter@Services@WHQ VNM3046: ASIAN_Agent@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: kevin@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: Mack@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: RCon@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3046: RoboCop@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: robocop99@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3046: SAV@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3047: STDA@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3046: Surveys(at)SynapseSystems.COM VNM3047: Vpman@DTOps@ITDesktop VNM3048: Craig Engel@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: Don Brown@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: Jay Brown@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: John Curry@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: John Grable@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: John Haaland@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: Jon Price@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: Kevin Bleckmann@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: Kimberly Crandall@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: Mack Kigada@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3046: Mark Sharinghousen@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: NAN@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: Robert Boek@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3048: Terry Bingham@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3046: Vilma Villarama@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3046: RoboCop01@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop02@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop03@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop04@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop05@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3046: RoboCop06@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3047: test@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3048: Test Dummy@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3047: Test User3@LANMoves@USRIT VNM3048: Dummy account@SvrSupp@USRIT VNM3048: Mark Renteria@SvrSupp@USRIT VNM3047: Arthur_Svr@Services@WHQ VNM3047: Meridian01@Services@WHQ VNM3047: Utopia_Svr@Services@WHQ VNM3047 -- NO MAIL SERVICE SPECIFIED IN PROFILE Mail could not deliver the message because the appropriate SETMAIL command has not been entered in the recipient's user profile. Notify the recipient of this problem. The recipient's system administrator should verify that the user profile contains the appropriate SETMAIL command and mail service name. If changes to the profile are made, the recipient must log out and then log in again before Mail can deliver the message. The sender can recover the message and forward it when the recipient's user profile problem has been resolved. My wife bought me an ANR headset for my birthday. I liked it and let her try it. She liked it too. I bought her one so I could get mine back. The result of all this gift giving is that I have two very nice Sigtronics top of the line stereo headsets that I don't need, one with individual volume controls and cloth ear seal covers, and the other one with Oregon Aero Softtop Headband and Softseal earcup cushions. They will also work as mono with an adaptor plug from Radio Shack. Total value is over $500. at today's prices. I will sell both and throw in a carying case for $200. I will even throw in a push to talk switch that came with the headsets if I can find it. I have never used it because my previous plane didn't need it and neither does my RV. I'm sure that it is around my hangar somewhere. Earliest phone call or E-mail to me gets them and I will pay the shipping. Jim Cone jamescone(at)aol.com 422 Savannah Ridge Drive St. Charles, MO 63303 (314) 928-8703 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1997
From: Frank van der Hulst <frankv(at)pec.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Junk mail
dralle(at)matronics.com wrote: > It is possible, however, to download the current member list using special > messages to the mail list software. This avilability is fairly obscure > would unlikely be exploited by SPAMer trash. Are you saying that non-members can get the member list? If so, you may be able to set it so that only members can get it... I know that other lists I'm on have that option. It would be an unusually determined spammer who subscribed to a list to collect its addresses. Frank. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1997
From: <MAILER-DAEMON(at)nike.com>
Subject: Undeliverable Message
Subject: RV-List: Re: Junk mail Message not delivered to recipients below. Press F1 for help with VNM error codes. VNM3047: CanstarMailRouter@Services@WHQ VNM3047: Lyz Jones@Beaverton56@Servers VNM3048: MailDump@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: RosenbluthMailRouter@Services@WHQ VNM3047: Arthur_Svr@Services@WHQ VNM3047: Utopia_Svr@Services@WHQ VNM3047 -- NO MAIL SERVICE SPECIFIED IN PROFILE Mail could not deliver the message because the appropriate SETMAIL command has not been entered in the recipient's user profile. Notify the recipient of this problem. The recipient's system administrator should verify that the user profile contains the appropriate SETMAIL command and mail service name. If changes to the profile are made, the recipient must log out and then log in again before Mail can deliver the message. The sender can recover the message and forward it when the recipient's user profile problem has been resolved. >-------------- > > I wonder if any others on the list have all of a sudden started receiving >a lot of junk E-mail? Are these people pulling our addresses off of the >list or, is it because I posted a couple of times to a couple of newsgroups. >I've received several unsolicited E-mails that are quite large and take a >long time to download. > > <...snip...> > >Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)navix.net >-------------- Listers- I too have noticed an increase in the amount of SPAM email I've been receiving over the last few months. Be aware that the information you have configured into your web browser can generally be captured by the web sites you visit - information such as your email address, etc. As Bob mentioned, posting to news groups is also a great way to get added to SPAM lists. I don't expect there is anything special going on with the recent increase in junk mail; I just think the 'quick-buck' people are just getting online. What next - the physic-network on the Inter-network...? -Oh, great. I just went through last month's US Mail junk-mail (I go though it once a month when I do my bills), and excluding the monthly publications I receive on purpose, I ended up hauling about 10 lbs of useless crap out to the trash. What a waste. At least with Internet SPAM, innocent trees don't have to die... Finally, I want to assure everyone on the Lists that under no circumstances do I sell or release to rv-list and zenith-list email addresses for profit. It is possible, however, to download the current member list using special messages to the mail list software. This avilability is fairly obscure would unlikely be exploited by SPAMer trash. I do, however, reserve the right to use the Lists as necessary to shamelessly promote the Matronics' product line... :-) Matt Dralle RV-List & Zenith-List Admin. -- Matt G. Dralle | Matronics | P.O. Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 510-606-1001 Voice | 510-606-6281 FAX | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ W.W.W. | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1997
From: <MAILER-DAEMON(at)nike.com>
Subject: Undeliverable Message
Subject: RV-List: Starrett 737 SPC Output... Message not delivered to recipients below. Press F1 for help with VNM error codes. VNM3047: CanstarMailRouter@Services@WHQ VNM3047: Lyz Jones@Beaverton56@Servers VNM3048: MailDump@GlobalAdmin@CIT VNM3047: RosenbluthMailRouter@Services@WHQ VNM3047: Arthur_Svr@Services@WHQ VNM3047: Utopia_Svr@Services@WHQ VNM3047 -- NO MAIL SERVICE SPECIFIED IN PROFILE Mail could not deliver the message because the appropriate SETMAIL command has not been entered in the recipient's user profile. Notify the recipient of this problem. The recipient's system administrator should verify that the user profile contains the appropriate SETMAIL command and mail service name. If changes to the profile are made, the recipient must log out and then log in again before Mail can deliver the message. The sender can recover the message and forward it when the recipient's user profile problem has been resolved. [Listers- I realize that this topic isn't really about RVs, but I posted the message below to rec.crafts.metalworking and didn't really get any response. I know there are a couple of metal workers on this List so it seemed like a good crowd to ask... :-) -Matt] Subject: Starrett 737 SPC Output Specification - Help. I have a Starrett 737 vertical scale on the knee of my vertical mill and would like to interface its SPC digital output to a small, single axis display unit manufactured by Mitutoyo (Series 572). The Mitutoyo display unit came with a really nice technical spec on the SPC data format (both protocol and electrical information) that it is expecting. The Starrett, on the other hand, came with a useless sheet of paper on how to press its front panel buttons - no documentation whatsoever on the SPC. Does anyone have some technical information on the SPC port on the Starrett 737? I am in need of the following bits of information: # Pin out (Both the square 4 pin on the unit and the 6 pin on the connecting cable.) # Electrical characteristics (hi/lo levels, timings, etc.) # Output protocol specification. Any information you could email or FAX my way would be most helpful. Thanks, Matt Dralle -- Matt G. Dralle | Matronics | P.O. Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 510-606-1001 Voice | 510-606-6281 FAX | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ W.W.W. | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 11, 1997
Subject: Re: canopy don'ts
<< I used whatever resin comes with the fiberglass repair kits. I'm sure it wasn't epoxy. >> Uh-oh. I heard that polyester against plexi was very bad thing. I can't recall the exact chemical reaction, but I seem to recall that the MEK in the polyester removes the plasticizers from the plexi, allowing it to crack and craze in the area of the bond. Isn't this covered in the assy manual? Check six! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Lauritsen" <clevtool(at)tdsi.net>
Subject: Re: Cleaveland Tool web page update
Date: Aug 11, 1997
> If it's a simple conversion of > the files used to print your catalog, that's one thing, but a straight HTML > version with .gifs or .Jpegs is probably a better way to go. > -- > Richard Chandler > We do our entire catalog in house digitally, print a laser proof, and send the hard disk to the printing company. To convert to the pdf format we just "print" to the acrobat builder and upload the files to my server. In effect everyone has access to the catalog before the ups man picks up the disk to take it to the printer. (it may be the fed ex man next time). We have had many requests for pictures in our html. The pictures at the current resolution take up ~750meg. and with the time to convert them to lower res. and add to the html combined with cost of server space and number of pictures I don't see it as an option at this time. The text html version of the catalog will remain as always, but may take a few days to come up to date. Thanks, Mike Lauritsen Cleaveland Aircraft Tool 2225 First St. Boone, IA 50036 1-800-368-1822 clevtool(at)tdsi.net http://www.cleavelandtool.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kevin Beaton <beatonk(at)usaa.com>
Subject: RV6 fuselage for sale
Date: Aug 11, 1997
RV6 fuselage jig for sale. Two fuselages built on the jig. It is for sale for $75. Please respond to, Kevin Beaton beatonk(at)usaa.com San Antonio, Texas ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1997
From: John Darby <johnd@our-town.com>
Subject: Re: Junk mail
receiving >a lot of junk E-mail? Are these people pulling our addresses off of the >list or, is it because I posted a couple of times to a couple of newsgroups. Bob; I would suspect from a source other than the list. I haven't received any except that one to the list about a month ago. I'm not involved with any newsgroups since 1) I don't know how and 2) my local provider doesn't support/provide a newsgroup service. John Darby RV6 sold Stephenville TX johnd@our-town.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1997
From: "A. Reichert" <reichera(at)clark.net>
Subject: Re: Junk mail
All, Please allow me to address the junk mail problem. First: "I wonder if any others on the list have all of a sudden started receiving a lot of junk E-mail? Are these people pulling our addresses off of the list or, is it because I posted a couple of times to a couple of newsgroups. I've received several unsolicited E-mails that are quite large and take a long time to download." More than likely, it is due to newsgroup postings. UseNet is popular for "farming" e-mail addresses for bulk mail purposes. Another source is web pages. If you have your e-mail address on a web page, it may have been picked up by a web robot for mail purposes. "How does one combat this annoyance? I notice in some of the newsgroups that people have inserted extra characters in their E-mail addresses. I guess this would cause a bounced message if a spammer were to send to a modified address." Yes, it will, as long as whoever is doing the farming does not pick up on the modification and correct it. There are no guarantees, of course, but it should help. "If I modify my E-mail address to: BSkinner*nospam*@navix.net when my real address is BSkinner(at)navix.net, will this stop the spam?" Probably not stop it, but reduce it. "I know I would also like to know the info from some of the computer experts. What really pisses me off is when I get junk mail telling me how to send baulk junk mail. There ought to be a law against using a phony email address if sending junk mail." There isn't. However, Representative Chris Smith is introducing a law to do just this. Hey, I'm interested NOW. I, too, am getting far more than I want of SPAM. I even got an e-mail from some Lawyer telling ME to cease and desist from complaining about any SPAM their client may have sent; I didn't complain about any spam but still got that 'cease and desist' email. Did anyone else get an email from 'Russell L. Allyn, Attorney at Law', khskllp(at)aol.com, telling them to stop complaining about their clients 'protected activity under the laws of free speech'??" The mail you refer to was a fraud. It appears that someone at Samsung got someone else "pissed off" at them, so they have turned around and tried to frame Samsung and this "lawyer". Pay no attention to it. Depending on what kind of e-mail client you have, there may be something you can do. For the folks with Unix access, if your local mail delivery agent is "procmail", you can use a .procmailrc file to filter out unwanted sites. It is some work, but I have it running on one of my sites, and it does filter out quite a bit of stuff and bounces it right back to the postmaster of that site. If your local delivery agent is "deliver", the use of a .deliver script is useful. I have one that I've written to filter incoming mail and process it according to entries in an information file. My script is beta, but if you want to try it, let me know. If you are running the latest version of Eudora, it has the capability to filter mail. I'm not familiar enough with it to explain it, but I know it exists. Apparently, it also filters on user-defined parameters and processes it accordingly. Two other things to do. If you can read the headers, you can determine what site the stuff came from and return it, headers and all, to postmaster@ as a complaint. Some of this won't work because some sites exist solely to support bulk e-mail (commonly called Unsolicited Commercial E-mail (UCE) or "spam"). Such sites are CyberPromo and Answerme.com (which are actually the same). You will also see savetrees.com. If you want more information and to show support, look at: http://www.cauce.org CAUCE (Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail) is working to curb UCE, and is in support of Chris Smith's legislation. Get more info on it from the CAUCE site. I'll shut up now. :-) - Alan Reichert News Administrator, Spam fighter, Wannabe RV-6 builder #24179 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rimbold(at)apollo.hp.com
Date: Aug 11, 1997
Subject: Re: Junk mail
> I wonder if any others on the list have all of a sudden started > receiving a lot of junk E-mail? Are these people pulling our > addresses off of the list or, is it because I posted a couple of > times to a couple of newsgroups. No, I haven't been receiving spam. Most of the addresses to which spam is sent are derived from newsgroup postings, although some comes from websites that ask you to register (and give your email address) before using them. You don't always have to give your correct email address to the latter, if don't want them to contact you. > How does one combat this annoyance? I notice in some of the newsgroups > that people have inserted extra characters in their E-mail addresses. I > guess this would cause a bounced message if a spammer were to send to a > modified address. Exactly. This is probably the easiest way to save yourself the trouble and cost of downloading junk email just so that you can discover that it's junk. Be kind, and pick an email domain that doesn't exist. Otherwise, the spam will make its way through the net to the valid mail domain and be rejected by it once it determines that the user doesn't exist at the site. A bogus domain (I just checked) is invalid.net, so setting your return email address to bogus(at)invalid.net would be OK. > If I modify my E-mail address to: BSkinner*nospam*@navix.net when my real > address is BSkinner(at)navix.net, will this stop the spam? It would stop people who acquire email address from future news postings from sending you email, but navix.net would still incur the costs. -- 'Rob Rob Rimbold Hewlett Packard Company Workstation Systems Division rimbold(at)apollo.hp.com Note: These are my own opinions, and do not necessarily represent those of Hewlett Packard. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Bumflyer(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 11, 1997
Subject: Re: Aileron mounting bracket
It's been a while but I remember grinding off a lot. On the order of 1/4 inch at least. Be sure and use both templates on the aileron as you may have some twist in the aileron or the wing and you want the best fit. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1997
From: Rick and Barbara Osgood <randbosgood(at)sprintmail.com>
Subject: Molex plugs
I purchased a Wheelen Strobe power supply at OSH this year but decided to get the cable and connectors back in Minneapolis. As I am finding.... these molex connectors are not in any electronics stores, including the "Electronics Parts Suppliers". Does anyone have a source on these connectors??? Thanks Rick Osgood ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6160hp(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 11, 1997
Subject: Re: Superior Air Parts, O-360? +prop discussion
2 RV6 builders here: We, stopped in the Superior booth at OSH 97. We saw a sectioned in half, crank shaft and half a engine case of theirs. What is of the now "Kit 0360". 2 years ago they said it shouldn't be long now, and they really appeared less than optimistic for it in a reasonable future in OSH 97 now. They led us to believe they have lots to go and lots of projects to left on their plate. Same with a F/P metal prop from Sensencrich (please, excuse spelling). A 0360 180 F/P appears a long way off. The ones they had developed were poor performers and vibration problems. The 160HP metal props factory limiting to 2600 rpm appears to be a forever, as vibrations are present in current one past that, and subesequent tests of F/P metals for 160 hp with out vibrations were such configured that performance sucked. Good thing, though out of Sensencrich (again please, excuse spelling) folks was a metal prop spinner. $300.00 more, anodized and all per drilled to bolt on their props and all on the RV. Is it worth it? RV6160hp(at)aol.com Dave McManmon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1997
From: Denny Harjehausen <retflygtiger(at)proaxis.com>
Subject: Electronic Ignition
I purchased a CDI Electornic Ignition from Van's last year but my engine is a older Lyc. from a Apachi (O-320 A3A) which doesn't have a boss on the front of the case to bolt the bracket to. I could make a bracket to bolt to the case but I would prefer to stay with the production type of installation for this unit as I know that works. So I would like to sell it. I was told this unit is certified in down in Australia which I take on good faith because of the source. Other than reading the manual it is un-used, still in the original box. I would take $800.00 for it. Which is a $400.00 loss for me, and a saving of $139. from Van's lastest price for you. You can E-mail me off the RV-net or call (541)259-4500. Have a good one! Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH Fuselage-top side Lebanon, OR ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1997
From: Edward Cole <emcole(at)concentric.net>
Subject: Re: Aileron mounting bracket
Rick and Barbara Osgood wrote: > > > Hello all... I am in need of some quick advice. > > I am working on the left wing aileron on my 6A. The mounting brackets > W-613 and W-614 are a > little wider than the rear spar and as rough fitted, will not line up > within the template very well. > > Rick, I cut off almost 1/4" off of what would be the top of the bracket with wings level. Ed Cole ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mitch Faatz <mfaatz(at)sagenttech.com>
Subject: 6A QB
Date: Aug 11, 1997
I kind of did both. First, I took screwed two pieces of wood to the top of my sawhorse which were shimmed up to a mild "V" shape (to match the bottom of the fuselage perfectly right under the spar) and the sawhorse beefed up with crossbraces. I placed a foam mat between this and the fuselage. It is nice a sturdy, even when getting in and out of the fuselage. I then had a piece of 2x6 planed down to fit as a spar. This doesn't carry any weight really (well, I used wedges between the spar and the sawhorse, so some weight is being transferred). The nice this is that you can drill through the spar to mount your control stick mounts, etc. Mitch Faatz San Jose, CA N727MF (reserved) RV-6AQME fitting fore top skin and instrument panel > ---------- > From: mcomeaux > Sent: Saturday, August 09, 1997 9:44 PM > To: RV-List > Subject: RV-List: 6A QB > > > Can one support the fuselage by the wood they insert > for shipping or set it up on saw horses on blankets? > When I say wood I mean where the spar goes through. > Mike Comeaux 6A QB > > > > +-- > --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at > http://www.matronics.com | > | --- > | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email > "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or > subject. | > | --- > | > | Please aggressivly edit quoted text on a followup posting! > | > +-- > --+ > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1997
From: Edward Cole <emcole(at)concentric.net>
Subject: Re: Molex plugs
Rick and Barbara Osgood wrote: > > > I purchased a Wheelen Strobe power supply at OSH this year but decided > to get the cable and connectors > back in Minneapolis. As I am finding.... these molex connectors are not > in any electronics stores, including > the "Electronics Parts Suppliers". Does anyone have a source on these > connectors??? > > Thanks > Rick Osgood > > Rick, Try Digi-Key. 1-800-344-4539 www.digikey.com. Molex/Waldom Ed Cole ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1997
From: Cheryl Sanchez <csanchez(at)mailhost.avici.com>
Subject: brazing question
Listers, I have a question about brazing. I want to braze those little primer fittings to some pieces of copper line. What kind of material do I use? Also, how hot does it have to get? Can I use a propane torch or is something more sophisticated necessary. I have never brazed before so help is appreciated here. Thanks in advance. Cheryl Sanchez csanchez(at)world.std.com RV6-A ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1997
From: mauser(at)claris.com (Richard Chandler)
Subject: Re: Junk mail
The most effective filtering technique I've discovered is to a) create seperate mailbox files for all of the mailing lists I'm on, b) create filters to refile messages to those mailboxes. For example, I have one that looks for "RV-List" in the subject line and it gets filed to the RV-List mailbox. I soon realized that very little of the spam actually has my individual address on it. So I created another mailbox file for my personal mail, and set a filter to look for mauser(at)claris.com in the To: or CC: lines and refile it there. Now that only thing that gets left in my normal in-box is the spam. Just for fun, I decided that this month I would let it pile up and see just how much I get. It's up to 85 right now, and it's only the 11th. -- Richard Chandler RV-6: Garage bought and being finished, saving for tools and tail kit. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BPattonsoa(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 11, 1997
Subject: Re: Aluminum bonding agent
T ________________________________________________________________________________
From: kevin lane <n3773(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Superior Air Parts, O-360? +prop discussion
Date: Aug 11, 1997
>Good thing, though out of Sensencrich (again please, excuse spelling) folks >was a metal prop spinner. $300.00 more, anodized and all per drilled to bolt >on their props and all on the RV. Is it worth it? > The folks in the next hanger recently lost a spinner from their Bellanca during take-off. The metal spinner bent the prop slightly and took out a chunk of the cowling. I was wondering if the fiberglass RV spinner would cause similar damage if it ever let go? kevin ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Rozendaal" <DougR(at)netins.net>
Subject: Re: MN RV-4 Accident
Date: Aug 10, 1997
Listers, Right after this unfortunate accident I pulled up the rear seat in my -4 and made a casual inspection of the F-440 elev push tube. It appeared strong and intact. Upon returning from OSH I learned of the discovery of another -4 F-440 tube had been found with cracks. This caused me to disassemble and Remove mine for a Dye penetrant check. I previously mentioned that the previous inspection had been casual because when I got it out of my airplane I discovered that mine was welded, This puzzled me and I got a magnet and found that the builder of my airplane had built F-440 and the one between the front and rear sticks out of -4130. This pleased me. I called to query why and to find if he had previously had a problem, He had not but replied when he built it I just did not look heavy enough, so he chose -4130. The A&P who disassembled the wreckage is a friend as well and he described the failure to a metals guy. It is his belief that it was a fatigue failure. The NTSB has the failed tube and the cracked tube from the other airplane. I spoke with Van at OSH and they were paying close attention to this investigation. I would not presume to recommend that anyone rush out and rebuild this tube from -4130 and I fully understand that there is no definitive evidence currently, to determine whether the failure of F-440 was caused by or the cause of this accident. If however you are a friend of mine, I insist that you pull F-440 out, dye check it and make absolutely sure that it does not rub on any structure or bulkheads. Don't just look at it. The cracked one looked fine! Get it dye checked! If you find out anything let Van and the rest of us know. I am certain that most will find nothing wrong, but if even one more cracked tube is found and someone's life is spared, then Kosta's terrible death will have served a useful purpose. Please! and Thank you, Doug Rozendaal N240 P.S. If you are considering airing this off, because you are busy or "that won't happen to me," consider what it was like to be climbing at a near vertical attitude, stall the airplane and try to recover from a stall with trim walking the airplane down with the rudders in a falling leaf maneuver, all of this below 300 ft. Go try to fly your bird around the patch with the trim. Please! Check it! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ShelbyRV6A(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 11, 1997
Subject: Re: Junk mail
I just recently changed my E-Mail address because of all the junk mail. Working great so far. Shelby in Nashville. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1997
From: Finn Lassen <finnlass(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Molex plugs
Try Mouser - 1-800-34-MOUSER (Fax: 817-483-0931) or DigiKey- 1-800-344-4539 Finn Rick and Barbara Osgood wrote: > > > I purchased a Wheelen Strobe power supply at OSH this year but decided > to get the cable and connectors > back in Minneapolis. As I am finding.... these molex connectors are not > in any electronics stores, including > the "Electronics Parts Suppliers". Does anyone have a source on these > connectors??? > > Thanks > Rick Osgood ________________________________________________________________________________
From: KBoatri144(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 11, 1997
Subject: Re: Superior Air Parts, O-360?
I e-mailed Superior this question about a month ago. The answer was: "We hope to have the kits ready in about a year. (g)" I'm not counting on this as a viable short term option. Kyle Boatright RV-6 fuse ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1997
From: mauser(at)claris.com (Richard Chandler)
Subject: Re: Cleaveland Tool web page update
> We do our entire catalog in house digitally, print a laser proof, and > send the hard disk to the printing company. To convert to the pdf > format we just "print" to the acrobat builder and upload the files to > my server. In effect everyone has access to the catalog before the > ups man picks up the disk to take it to the printer. (it may be the fed > ex man next time). We have had many requests for pictures in our > html. The pictures at the current resolution take up ~750meg. and > with the time to convert them to lower res. and add to the html > combined with cost of server space and number of pictures I don't see > it as an option at this time. The text html version of the catalog > will remain as always, but may take a few days to come up to date. Ah, in which case it's prefectly reasonable, since the acrobat file IS meant for both print and online. That is one of its strengths (call it "Cross- Media" instead of "Cross-Platform"). The only reason I raised the issue in the first place is because I've seen it abused before. -- Richard Chandler RV-6: Garage bought and being finished, saving for tools and tail kit. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1997
From: Curt Reimer <Curt_Reimer(at)mbnet.mb.ca>
Subject: Re: Cracked Canopy part II
Finn Lassen wrote: > > > Curt Reimer wrote: > > Then reassemble the skirt and use a standard bit to drill though the > holes in the outer skirt and plexi, > > Sounds like asking for trouble enlarging the hole in plexi with a normal > bit?! I don't mean use a larger bit; use a #40 on the outer skin, a number #40 plexi drill on the plexi, and a $ 40 or 41 for the final hole. I used a #41 just to make sure I had a bit of clearance. The final screw holes will be oversized, so the tiny misalagnment you might get by using a #41 drill through a #40 pilot hole really isn't a factor. Drill the final clearance holes in the plexi with a larger plexi drill after disassembly. BTW, I also welded on the small .040 steel tabs to help with the skirt alignment. They work great, but be careful when you backdrill through the skirts. Last night I managed to miss the wood block when the drill popped through and put a #40 hole into my left middle finger. It was painful and bloody. Curt ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
From: wstucklen1(at)juno.com (Frederic W Stucklen)
Date: Aug 11, 1997
Rob, I have LCD displays in my RV-6A (tipup canopy) and have'nt had any problems.... Fred Stucklen RV-6A N925RV (Working on 2'd RV-6A - Chevy Powered!) wstucklen1(at)juno.com apollo.hp.com!rimbold(at)matronics.com writes: > > >> Does anyone have an option, either good or bad, about using vision >> microsystems > >Has anyone ever had excess heat cause a problem with their electronic >cockpit displays? I've seen cockpit heat blacken an LCD engine >monitor until the cockpit temperature dropped (about 10 minutes after >the canopy was tipped up). > >It's only for this reason that I'm leaning away from using electronic >displays. I believe that gas plasma or LED displays won't have this >problem. The Vision display is all LCD. Would anyone from Florida >using one of these please comment? > >'Rob > > > > > +-- > --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at >http://www.matronics.com | > | --- > | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email >"rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or >subject. | > | --- > | > | Please aggressivly edit quoted text on a followup posting! > | > +-- > --+ > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6junkie(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 11, 1997
Subject: Re: Not happy w/vision microsystems
I have had an EPI-800 system in my RV-6 since new (150 hours ago). I have had nothing but trouble with the tach system. I'm on my second sensor and this one is crapping out as well. VM's response...send us $350 more dollors (in addition to the $2,600) and we will send you a tach that works better. No thanks. I'll put in somebodys else's system before I give them any more of my money. I'm going to try to have another tach attached to the EPI-800 tach face. (I'm using a Jeff Rose EI so I'll use his tach for $100). Anybody got any ideas? Oh, the internal battery died in my EPI CPU and I've lost all of my tach time as well. Seems as though this is "normal" every two years! Gary Corde RV-6 N211GC - NJ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 11, 1997
Subject: Re: Superior Air Parts, O-360? +prop discussion
<< I was wondering if the fiberglass RV spinner would cause similar damage if it ever let go? >> You bet! Prop, Cowling, etc. It happened to a Lancair I am aware of and it's not pretty. IMO make sure that they are properly attached to the front and rear bulkheads and inspect them closely for continued structural integrity. Use large OD countersunk washers with flat head screws or use Truss head screws. When you remove them to inspect/service the prop hub, replace the fasteners. It's cheap insurance. -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 11, 1997
Subject: Re: AMP, not Molex, plugs
<< As I am finding.... these Molex connectors are not in any electronics stores, including the "Electronics Parts Suppliers". Does anyone have a source on these connectors??? >> Rick- First off, they are AMP MATE-N-LOK connectors with .082" contacts. These connectors can be confuddling because AMP also makes a Molex equivalent for both .062" and .093" sizes. They appear similar to those not aware of their differences, but the MATE-N-LOK connectors CANNOT be intermated (the contacts or the housings) with Molex. You can get cable and connectors from Van's (although Van's accessories catalog, too, erroneously refers to them as "Molex" connectors). It's a nit but, if Bill Benedict is lurking, perhaps he could take the executive bull by the horns and correct the faux pas in the next iteration. >From Van's: LN A441-3 for the 3 pin male contact version, LN A442-3 for the 3 pin female contact version (contacts are included. If you bought them from an electronics house you would certainly need to buy the housings and contacts separately as housings in bulk and continuous feeding contacts on reels for automatic machines. BTW, you must use proper crimping tools for these contacts in order to obtain a reliable installation, particularly with the high tension circuits. Consult fellow local chapter members and there should be someone with the right equipment (Palladin makes a good one). You should also get Whelen's installation instructions to ensure that you are wiring it up correctly. They are notoriously intolerant of being connected up improperly (Can you say $$$$?). Make sure to ground the cable shield drain wire at the power supply end only. Van's also has various length cable installation packages shown in their on-line accessories catalog which is located at http://www.vansaircraft.com -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Bumflyer(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 12, 1997
Subject: Re: Cracked Canopy part II
If you were to check the FBI files you would probably find all RV builders have fingerprints with Number 40 hole scars in them. Welcome to the club, and be proud you made it to the canopy for your first. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 12, 1997
Subject: Re: brazing question
<< I want to braze those little primer fittings to some pieces of copper line. What kind of material do I use? Also, how hot does it have to get? Can I use a propane torch or is something more sophisticated necessary. I have never brazed before so help is appreciated here. >> Cheryl- What you're proposing is okay but an improvement IMO would be to buy the 1/8" stainless steel tubing (ACS P/N 03-16010) and silver solder them. This is simply done using sand paper, a hand torch, the proper silver solder and a S/S powder flux. This stuff is all available at a quality hardware store. DO NOT use soft (tin-lead) solders. Be sure that you use stress relieving loops (1.5-2.0" in diameter) at critical points in the routing. I elected to use a S/S braided teflon hose assy (Earl's stuff done by Bowers Performance in Livermore, CA) from the firewall mouted primer solenoid to an aluminum tee mounted on the engine baffle stiffener angle. From the tee I ran the S/S tubing to the primer fittings on the front two jugs. I think this is quite adequate. -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 1997
From: jim jewell <jjewell(at)okanagan.net>
Subject: Re: Cracked Canopy part II
>To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >From: jim jewell <jjewell(at)okanagan.net> >Subject: Re: RV-List: Cracked Canopy part II > >> >>Finn Lassen wrote: >>> >>> >>> Curt Reimer wrote: >>> > Then reassemble the skirt and use a standard bit to drill though the > holes in the outer skirt and plexi, >>> >>> Sounds like asking for trouble enlarging the hole in plexi with a normal >>> bit?! >> >>I don't mean use a larger bit; use a #40 on the outer skin, a number #40 plexi drill on the plexi, and a $ 40 or 41 >>for the final hole. I used a #41 just to make sure I had a bit of clearance. The final screw holes will be oversized, >>so the tiny misalagnment you might get by using a #41 drill through a #40 pilot hole really isn't a factor. >> >>Drill the final clearance holes in the plexi with a larger plexi drill after disassembly. >> >>BTW, I also welded on the small .040 steel tabs to help with the skirt alignment. They work great, but be careful >>when you backdrill through the skirts. Last night I managed to miss the wood block when the drill popped through and >>put a #40 hole into my left middle finger. It was painful and bloody. >> >>Curt >> >>hello curt > in the future when drilling #40 holes in your fingers you can kill the pain by immediately dropping your drill motor on your toe. i think the problem of the mess caused by the bleeding might be solved by installing a an426ad3-3.5 in the hole, a drop of crazy glue might help, although i have not tried this as yet. i hope this helps you in the future. > >jim jewell - rv6a started 4/97 riveting spars. dreams do come true!. >> +-- --+ >> | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | >> | --- | >> | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | >> | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | >> | --- | >> | Please aggressivly edit quoted text on a followup posting! | >> +-- --+ >> ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 1997
From: jim jewell <jjewell(at)okanagan.net>
Subject: Re: Cracked Canopy part II
> >Finn Lassen wrote: >> >> >> Curt Reimer wrote: >> > Then reassemble the skirt and use a standard bit to drill though the > holes in the outer skirt and plexi, >> >> Sounds like asking for trouble enlarging the hole in plexi with a normal >> bit?! > >I don't mean use a larger bit; use a #40 on the outer skin, a number #40 plexi drill on the plexi, and a $ 40 or 41 >for the final hole. I used a #41 just to make sure I had a bit of clearance. The final screw holes will be oversized, >so the tiny misalagnment you might get by using a #41 drill through a #40 pilot hole really isn't a factor. > >Drill the final clearance holes in the plexi with a larger plexi drill after disassembly. > >BTW, I also welded on the small .040 steel tabs to help with the skirt alignment. They work great, but be careful >when you backdrill through the skirts. Last night I managed to miss the wood block when the drill popped through and >put a #40 hole into my left middle finger. It was painful and bloody. > >Curt > >hello curt in the future when drilling #40 holes in your fingers you can kill the pain by immediately dropping your drill motor on your toe. i think the problem of the mess caused by the bleeding might be solved by installing a an426ad3-3.5 in the hole, a drop of crazy glue might help, although i have not tried this as yet. i hope this helps you in the future. jim jewell - rv6a started 4/97 riveting spars. dreams do come true!. > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > | --- | > | Please aggressivly edit quoted text on a followup posting! | > +-- --+ > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JamesCone(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 12, 1997
Subject: Headset Sold
I sold the headset that I posted on the list. If the sale falls through, I have kept copies of the E-mails that I got from those who were too late and will let you know if they become available again. Thanks Jim Cone jamescone(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 1997
From: RodWoodard <rodwoodard(at)mcione.com>
Subject: Re: Cracked Canopy part II
> > If you were to check the FBI files you would probably find all RV builders > have fingerprints with Number 40 hole scars in them. Welcome to the club, > and be proud you made it to the canopy for your first. No kidding... I don't think I made it past the HS skeleton before I put a hole in my finger. Mine's a #41 size though... once I poke myself with my dimple die I'm sure it'll spread out to a #40. :-) Rod Woodard RV-8, #80033 Loveland, Colorado Waiting on replacement parts--At least I _lost_ them this time instead of messing something up! :-) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 1997
From: jim jewell <jjewell(at)okanagan.net>
Subject: Re: Cracked Canopy part II
>Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 09:13:32 >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >From: jim jewell <jjewell(at)okanagan.net> >Subject: Re: RV-List: Cracked Canopy part II > >> >>Finn Lassen wrote: >>> >>> >>> Curt Reimer wrote: >>> > Then reassemble the skirt and use a standard bit to drill though the > holes in the outer skirt and plexi, >>> >>> Sounds like asking for trouble enlarging the hole in plexi with a normal >>> bit?! >> >>I don't mean use a larger bit; use a #40 on the outer skin, a number #40 plexi drill on the plexi, and a $ 40 or 41 >>for the final hole. I used a #41 just to make sure I had a bit of clearance. The final screw holes will be oversized, >>so the tiny misalagnment you might get by using a #41 drill through a #40 pilot hole really isn't a factor. >> >>Drill the final clearance holes in the plexi with a larger plexi drill after disassembly. >> >>BTW, I also welded on the small .040 steel tabs to help with the skirt alignment. They work great, but be careful >>when you backdrill through the skirts. Last night I managed to miss the wood block when the drill popped through and >>put a #40 hole into my left middle finger. It was painful and bloody. >> >>Curt >> >>hello curt > in the future when drilling #40 holes in your fingers you can kill the pain by immediately dropping your drill motor on your toe. i think the problem of the mess caused by the bleeding might be solved by installing a an426ad3-3.5 in the hole, a drop of crazy glue might help, although i have not tried this as yet. i hope this helps you in the future. > >jim jewell - rv6a started 4/97 riveting spars. dreams do come true!. >> +-- --+ >> | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | >> | --- | >> | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | >> | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | >> | --- | >> | Please aggressivly edit quoted text on a followup posting! | >> +-- --+ >> > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 1997
From: halk(at)sybase.com (Hal Kempthorne)
Subject: Re: Cracked Canopy part II - number drill sizes
Hi all, I thought a #41 was *SMALLER* than a #40? > for the final hole. I used a #41 just to make sure I had a bit of clearance. I wonder if the difference in a single number is enough clearance? By the way, in several places Van's says to use a #12 drill with 3/16 inch bolts for a snugger fit. Isn't a #12 actually larger than a 3/16? Hal Kempthorne OSHKOSH! Got some good inspiration. halk(at)sybase.com Santa Clara, CA. Debonair N6134V @ SJC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 1997
From: mauser(at)claris.com (Richard Chandler)
Subject: Antique fly in
I thought I might mention that the Annual Antique Airplane Fly-in at Evergreen Field (Vancouver Washington) will be held this weekend. -- Richard Chandler RV-6: Garage bought and being finished, saving for tools and tail kit. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 1997
From: Terry Mortimore <terry.mortimore(at)sympatico.ca>
Subject: Cowling length
Hi gang: I'm looking into the various gear reduction units that are available for my installation. Can somebody who has there lycoming engine mounted tell be how long it is from the firewall to the front face of the prop hub. Both for the constant speed and the fixed pitch. What would be the longest distance that the stock cowling would allow? thanks in advance, terry Terry Mortimore 2.7L Subaru RV-6A 38 Cartier St. Sault Ste Marie terry.mortimore(at)sympatico.ca Ontario Canada P6B-3K2 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 11, 1997
From: halk(at)sybase.com (Hal Kempthorne)
Subject: Re: Molex plugs - where to find
Here in Silicon Valley, they are in the grocery stores... or at least in many 'puter stores. If you can't find what you need, let me know. Hal Kempthorne RV-6AQ -- On main gear - panel stuff halk(at)sybase.com Santa Clara, CA. Debonair N6134V @ SJC > back in Minneapolis. As I am finding.... these molex connectors are not > in any electronics stores, including > the "Electronics Parts Suppliers". Does anyone have a source on these > connectors??? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 1997
From: Curt Reimer <Curt_Reimer(at)mbnet.mb.ca>
Subject: Re: Cracked Canopy part II - number drill sizes
Hal Kempthorne wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I thought a #41 was *SMALLER* than a #40? > > > for the final hole. I used a #41 just to make sure I had a bit of clearance. > > I wonder if the difference in a single number is enough clearance? I used a #41 to drill the inner skirt using the previously drilled #40 hole in the plexiglas as a pilot hole. I was worried that a #40 bit might get caught in the plexi hole and cause a crack. Probably overkill. I don't trust plexi until it has been counter sunk and deburred. Sharp edges are where cracks can start. For this reason be extra careful handling the canopy with raw cut edges or unchamfered holes. After disassembly, I drilled the final screw clearance holes, countersunk, dimpled, etc. BTW, thanks to those who welcomed me into the "#40 hole drilled finger" club. I am also a new member of the "broke a 6-32 tap while doing the rollbar" association. Curt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 1997
From: Curt Reimer <Curt_Reimer(at)mbnet.mb.ca>
Subject: Re: Cracked Canopy part II
RodWoodard wrote: > > > > > > If you were to check the FBI files you would probably find all RV > builders > > have fingerprints with Number 40 hole scars in them. Welcome to the > club, > > and be proud you made it to the canopy for your first. > > No kidding... I don't think I made it past the HS skeleton before I put a > hole in my finger. Mine's a #41 size though... once I poke myself with my > dimple die I'm sure it'll spread out to a #40. :-) Actually, its my second time (same finger). Its interesting how you end up with these little cylindrical lumps of scar tissue. An amazing thing, the human body... Curt ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Lundquist" <DLUNDQUIST(at)postoffice.worldnet.att.net>
Subject: LI-NY area projects
Date: Aug 12, 1997
Looking to get in touch with anyone currently building or flying an RV-6 in the Long Island New York area. I am strongly considering beginning an RV-6 project and would like to see both a work in progress and/or a finished plane. David Lundquist, RV-6 Preview Plans dlundquist(at)worldnet.att.net 6A Mills Rd Stony Brook, NY 11790 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 12, 1997
From: John Darby <johnd@our-town.com>
Subject: Re: brazing question
I want to braze >those little primer fittings to some pieces of copper >line. What kind of material do I use? Also, how hot >does it have to get? Can I use a propane torch or is Cheryl; If you are talking about the little nib/ball type fitting that a nut then fits over, mine were not brazed. Instead they were soldered to the copper tube. They had come off of a Piper Tomahawk. I did change the tubing. Just heated then up, popped them off, cleaned up, and soldered onto new tubing. A lot easier than brazing. John Darby RV6 sold Stephenville TX johnd@our-town.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Btinn(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 13, 1997
Subject: Re: Aileron mounting bracket
I also had to grind off about 1/4 inch from the top corner. My wing kit was put out about a month after they began producing the prepunched skins. Bob Tinnell Salem OR RV-6A wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "mcomeaux" <mcomeaux(at)cmc.net>
Subject: Stiffeners on Rudder
Date: Aug 12, 1997
I'm a little confussed as to the directions on stiffeners on rudder. They say to overlap by a 1/8 inch and according to the george tape it he says so the stiffeners won't make contact. But if you do as the manual says and compress the rudder together it looks to me like it will. Can someone clear this for me? RV6A...... Mike Comeaux-------mcomeaux(at)cmc.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: pbennett(at)zip.com.au
Date: Aug 13, 1997
Subject: Re: Cracked Canopy part II - (chatter)
> I am also a new member of the > "broke a 6-32 tap while doing the rollbar" association. What? Only one? I'll talk to you when you join me on the pro circuit. Peter Bennett Sydney Australia RV6 building sliding canopy ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stephen J. Soule" <SSoule(at)pfclaw.com>
Subject: Stiffeners on Rudder
Date: Aug 13, 1997
charset="iso-8859-1" You trim the trailing ends of the stiffeners at an angle. Trim them enough so that they overlap but don't touch even when you squeeze the trailing edge of the rudder into final shape. Steve Soule Huntington, Vermont Still waiting for the fuselage kit RV-6A -----Original Message----- From: mcomeaux [SMTP:cmc.net!mcomeaux(at)matronics.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 1997 1:30 AM To: RV-List Subject: RV-List: Stiffeners on Rudder I'm a little confussed as to the directions on stiffeners on rudder. They say to overlap by a 1/8 inch and according to the george tape it he says so the stiffeners won't make contact. But if you do as the manual says and compress the rudder together it looks to me like it will. Can someone clear this for me? RV6A...... Mike Comeaux-------mcomeaux(at)cmc.net +-- --+ | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | | --- | | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | | --- | | Please aggressivly edit quoted text on a followup posting! | +-- --+ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: David Wheaton <dwheaton(at)csi.com>
Subject: HS Forward Spar
Date: Aug 13, 1997
After I built up the front spar in the HS, I noticed that three of the four rivet holes through the HS 610 (smaller aluminum angle) on each of the spar tongues do not have the proper 2D edge distance (1/4"). The worst case edge distance is 1/16" shy of the 2D required. I cut only enough of the flange of the spar to get rid of the bend and then centered the 614 and 610 on the spar with the proper 3 and 1/4" spacing. I also made sure that the 614 and 610 did not protrude above the spar flanges. Anyway, that's how I did it and now I don't have the proper edge distance on the 610. Has anyone done this? And what did you do about it. Redo? Dave Wheaton rv6 Rosamond, CA ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 1997
From: "Scott A. Jordan" <SAJ_SLJ(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: Stiffeners on Rudder
To add to Steves answer... The stiffeners overlap so that during the process of finishing the traili= ng edge bend they will not contact the skin, putting a ding in it. = Scott A. Jordan 80331 elevators about done ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 1997
From: Greg Young <gyoung(at)net1.net>
Subject: Re: Stiffeners on Rudder
mcomeaux wrote: > > I'm a little confussed as to the directions on stiffeners on rudder. They > say to overlap by a 1/8 inch and according > to the george tape it he says so the stiffeners won't > make contact. But if you do as the manual says and > compress the rudder together it looks to me like it will. > Can someone clear this for me? RV6A...... It's a whole lot easier to see in a diagram than to describe. You'll need to view this character picture using a fixed pitch font. ----+--+ | | | | | | +--+--- For description purposes, call the flanges with the rivet holes the horizontal flange, and the non-riveted one the vertical flange. You want the stiffeners to "nest" with one vertical flange on the left of the rivet line and the other on the right of the rivet line. The offset means to position the vertical flanges with a gap about 1/8" less (not critical) than the width of the horizontal flange (3/4"). This allows the vertical flanges to hit the horizontal flange of the opposite stiffener (rather than the skin) if pressed together. Greg Young Citabria N90AV RV-6 s/n 23070 fuselage in jig ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 13, 1997
Subject: Re: Stiffeners on Rudder
<< I'm a little confussed as to the directions on stiffeners on rudder. They say to overlap by a 1/8 inch and according to the george tape it he says so the stiffeners won't make contact. But if you do as the manual says and compress the rudder together it looks to me like it will. The stiffeners will and should touch when you close the bend at the trailing edge. If they don't overlap, you will have a row of bumps where the stiffeners did touch the inside of the skin. Most dissappointing. Also, you may find that you need to shape the rear edge of the stiffeners to a finer point than is called out. Don't forget to put in some sort of RTV where the stiffeners meet at the trailing edge before you close the rudder & elevators. Check six! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 1997
From: Dennis Jackson <denny(at)transport.com>
Subject: Re: Stiffeners on Rudder
mcomeaux wrote: > > > I'm a little confussed as to the directions on stiffeners on rudder. They > say to overlap by a 1/8 inch and according > to the george tape it he says so the stiffeners won't > make contact. But if you do as the manual says and > compress the rudder together it looks to me like it will. > Can someone clear this for me? RV6A...... Mike: The stiffeners should be far enough offset so they don't rub when you bring the two skins together, something like this: ________________________ sin ________ | |stiffener | | stiffener| |_______ ___________________________ skin DJ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 1997
From: Greg Puckett <rv8er(at)concentric.net>
Subject: Re: Stiffeners on Rudder
mcomeaux wrote: > > I'm a little confussed as to the directions on stiffeners on rudder. > They > say to overlap by a 1/8 inch and according > to the george tape it he says so the stiffeners won't > make contact. But if you do as the manual says and > compress the rudder together it looks to me like it will. > Can someone clear this for me? RV6A...... > > Mike Comeaux-------mcomeaux(at)cmc.net > > Mike, The stiffeners will definitely hit the other side while making the final bend in the trailing edge. I guess it really depends on if you made the stiffeners to plan 1/8" thick (I think it was)at the trailing edge. When making the TE bend I had to over bend quite a bit so when it sprung back it matched the spar. Greg, RV8-80081 rv8er(at)concentric.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 1997
From: RELOSVCS!WESTREG!EHENSON(at)cldwell.attmail.com (Henson, Eric)
Subject: Finger Drilling
(Slow day on the list) Curt, I'm concerned about your recently drilled finger. You darn kids are taking this body piercing thing way too far. You did of course allow for proper edge clearance between the quick and the bone. If you plan to countersink that finger make sure you anchor the pilot head securely in the bone, wouldn't want to elongate. I personally recomend you countersink all appendages, it makes a handy dimple guage for future refrences. By the way I've heard rumors that spring back dimple dies allow for faster healing - hence the name. Buck up ole bud, at least you didn't do it drilling the spar, of course that would make for a handy place to keep your screwdriver. Eric Henson Waiting for UPS to bring my tank goodies. >>>BTW, thanks to those who welcomed me into the "#40 hole drilled finger" club. >>> Curt --+ | | | | | | --+ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 1997
From: Mike Hartmann <hartmann(at)sound.net>
Subject: Re: Stiffeners on Rudder
>I'm a little confussed as to the directions on stiffeners on rudder. They >say to overlap by a 1/8 inch and according Think 'offset' instead of 'overlap'. If you offset the stiffeners slightly in what will be the rudder's vertical direction, what will be the stiffener's horizontal surfaces on each side of the rudder will not touch each other. You do have to trim the aft end of the stiffeners as shown in the plans to keep that part of the stiffener from hitting the opposite inner surface of the rudder skin where it is narrow at the trailing edge. Too little offset and the stiffeners will interfere with each other, a little too much and you may have interference between a stiffener and the opposing stiffener's rivet shop heads. There is some leeway either way beyond the 1/8th inch specified. - Mike hartmann(at)sound.net http://www.sound.net/~hartmann ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 1997
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)navix.net>
Subject: Re: Junk mail
> >receiving >>a lot of junk E-mail? Are these people pulling our addresses off of the >>list or, is it because I posted a couple of times to a couple of newsgroups. > >Bob; > >I would suspect from a source other than the list. I haven't received any >except that one to the list about a month ago. I'm not involved with any >newsgroups since 1) I don't know how and 2) my local provider doesn't >support/provide a newsgroup service. >John Darby RV6 sold >Stephenville TX >johnd@our-town.com John, The spam kind of died off as quick as it started. Funny thing, the last spam I received was for a program to eliminate spam. Don't suppose the whole thing was a set up to sell an anti-spam program? Regards, Bob ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 1997
From: eprth(at)kneehill.com (Tim Houle)
Subject: Re: HS Forward Spar
> Re: the HS Front Spar measuring problems. Have a look at "Bunny's Guide to building an RV" http://www.pec.co.nz/~frankv/bunny.htm. He discusses the same problem you have I think under part !: "A Bunny's Tail -- The Empennage" Tim Houle Thinking about building rv6 Three Hills, Alberta *************************** Tim Houle email: eprth(at)kneehill.com *************************** ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 1997
From: eprth(at)kneehill.com (Tim Houle)
Are there any builders in Alberta, Canada Please reply to eprth(at)kneehill.com Tim Houle Three Hills, Alberta *************************** Tim Houle email: eprth(at)kneehill.com *************************** ________________________________________________________________________________
From: QFA1(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 13, 1997
Subject: Ride to homecoming
I'm seeking a ride from the Austin Tx. area to the homecoming. Prefer a -4 ride, as I'm building one, but beggers can't..... Will obviously share expenses. Please e-mail me off list or call 512-328-3631 days or 512-892-8895 eves. Thanks! Greg Hughes RV-4 fuse ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Angiulo <mikeang(at)MICROSOFT.com>
Subject: Cracked Canopy part II
Date: Aug 13, 1997
"> in the future when drilling #40 holes in your fingers you can kill the pain by immediately dropping your drill motor on your toe. i think the problem of the mess caused by the bleeding might be solved by installing a an426ad3-3.5 in the hole, a drop of crazy glue might help" Actually, 3M makes a special high strength tape to cover wounds like this but it isn't certified so I wouldn't go "experimenting" around with it. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 1997
From: "Richard Solana" <solanas(at)msn.com>
Subject: Cracked Canopy part II
Now let's hear from wives or other family members with Number 40 hole scars.... how many have unwittingly responded to "could you help me for just a few minutes?" and wound up with a scar of RV honor?!! It makes for a nice IOU ! ---------- > > If you were to check the FBI files you would probably find all RV > builders > > have fingerprints with Number 40 hole scars in them. Welcome to the > club, > > and be proud you made it to the canopy for your first. > > No kidding... I don't think I made it past the HS skeleton before I put a > hole in my finger. Mine's a #41 size though... once I poke myself with my > dimple die I'm sure it'll spread out to a #40. :-) Actually, its my second time (same finger). Its interesting how you end up with these little cylindrical lumps of scar tissue. An amazing thing, the human body... Curt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1997
From: L & M Rowles <lmrowles(at)netspace.net.au>
Subject: Re: HS Forward Spar
Hi Dave, Did the same thing!!! Ordered new pieces from and built again. Regards Les Rowles. Les Rowles Po Box 1895 Traralgon Australia 3844 lmrowles(at)netspace.net.au ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 1997
From: William Costello <bcos(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Stiffeners on Rudder
mcomeaux wrote: > > > I'm a little confussed as to the directions on stiffeners on rudder. They > say to overlap by a 1/8 inch and according > to the george tape it he says so the stiffeners won't > make contact. But if you do as the manual says and > compress the rudder together it looks to me like it will. > Can someone clear this for me? RV6A...... > > Mike Comeaux-------mcomeaux(at)cmc.net > Mike, I think you want to overlap the stifferers so that, if they make contact, they do so with the opposite stiffener and not the opposite skin, where they would make a nasty crease. Hope I can diagram below. _________ | |__________ Make sense? Bill Costello -- Bill Costello | bcos(at)ix.netcom.com | Building RV-6 | Reserv N97WC Cell Tech Ind Dist SBGA 800-325-7544 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 1997
From: John Ciolino <jbc1(at)ziplink.net>
Subject: Elevator leading edge
Listers: I have completed rolling the leading edge of the elevator. Are the rivet holes for the pop rivets dimpled? I can't find anything in the plans or George's video which say one way or another. TIA John Ciolino RV-8 jbc1(at)Ziplink.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 1997
From: Roy Epperson <roye(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Contacts in the San Francisco Bay Area
My wife and I are relocating back to the Bay Area and considering building a -6/6A once we get settled in. I see a bunch of finished -6s but have not had an opportunity to fly in one. I'm looking for someone who would be willing to take us for a test flight ( I know one of us at a time!). Thanks in advance, Roy ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Stiffeners on Rudder
Date: Aug 13, 1997
From: "William H. Watson" <watson1(at)alink.net>
>I'm a little confussed as to the directions on stiffeners on rudder. They >say to overlap by a 1/8 inch and according >to the george tape it he says so the stiffeners won't >make contact. But if you do as the manual says and >compress the rudder together it looks to me like it will. >Can someone clear this for me? RV6A...... It can be confusing. If you make all the stiffners the same and in pairs (i.e., the 6" slopes to the right on each, same length), and if you layout their location with the lines offset by 1/8 inch, per the instructions, on the top and bottom skin, then they would have the raised edge touching the flat, on the opposite side, of the other skin (and vis-versa). Neither would actually touch the skin. This is for handling; once installed with the skeleton they will not touch. Here is the catch: IMHO, their is only one way to position the 1/8 off set. I did it wrong and it wasn't working. I erased the lines and made the 1/8 offset on the other skin and all was well. Hope I didn't make it worse.... Bill Watson RV-6A Emp almost finished Wings in the boxes William H. Watson watson1(at)alink.net H: 415 254-1656 W: 408 553-4225 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 1997
From: Glenn & Judi <glenn(at)chocolatetruffles.com>
Subject: RV6 C-603
Hi, RE: RV-6 part C603, DWG 51 The sideview on this drawing show two rows of rivets along the length of this piece. One at the bottom, and one at the top (through the canopy). Section A-A on the same drawing show three rows of rivets along the length. Which is correct? or perhaps I am not seeing this correctly. Thanks in advance, Glenn Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1997
From: "les williams" <lesliebwilliams(at)msn.com>
Subject: HS Forward Spar
You can add some extra rivets with the correct edge distance between the ones that are too close. Les ---------- From: owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com on behalf of David Wheaton Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 1997 6:06 AM Subject: RV-List: HS Forward Spar After I built up the front spar in the HS, I noticed that three of the four rivet holes through the HS 610 (smaller aluminum angle) on each of the spar tongues do not have the proper 2D edge distance (1/4"). The worst case edge distance is 1/16" shy of the 2D required. I cut only enough of the flange of the spar to get rid of the bend and then centered the 614 and 610 on the spar with the proper 3 and 1/4" spacing. I also made sure that the 614 and 610 did not protrude above the spar flanges. Anyway, that's how I did it and now I don't have the proper edge distance on the 610. Has anyone done this? And what did you do about it. Redo? Dave Wheaton rv6 Rosamond, CA ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 1997
From: Thomas Velvick <rver(at)caljet.com>
Subject: Re: Elevator leading edge
John, My plans (RV-6a) show to use an AD-41-ABS pop rivet which doesn't need a dimpled hole. Regards, Tom Velvick RV-6a waiting on wings Phoenix, AZ > >Listers: > >I have completed rolling the leading edge of the elevator. Are the rivet >holes for the pop rivets dimpled? I can't find anything in the plans or >George's video which say one way or another. > >TIA > > > > >John Ciolino RV-8 >jbc1(at)Ziplink.net > > > > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > | --- | > | Please aggressivly edit quoted text on a followup posting! | > +-- --+ > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: kevin lane <n3773(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: a room with a view
Date: Aug 14, 1997
free guest room available to a builder and friend with a view of downtown Portland (well, in the winter with no leaves). I live in Ladd's Addition in near SE and will be driving out to the fly-in. kevin 6A-taxiing:=) top O/H :=( ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 13, 1997
From: Gil Alexander <gila(at)flash.net>
Subject: Re: RV6 C-603
Glenn, I'm not sure which is correct, but I kept it to the two fastener row version (the top row - through the plexi - is actually #6 screws into a plastic retainer strip, not rivets). There is a good reason .... If you only have one row of rivets holding the canopy skirt to the canopy frame, then it's quite easy to use small shims (or a tapered shim strip) inbetween these two parts. This shim(s) allows for a simple adjustment to make the edge of the canopy skirt fit really smoothly with the top 'corner' of the cockpit side rails. In my case, this was quite essential at the aft 2 to 3 inches of the canopy frame. Two rows of rivets would be extremely difficult to shim, since the upper canopy frame joggle size, and the variable plexiglas thickness come into play. A nice fit here really makes the tip-up canopies look good, a poor fit looks %^&%^%$! ... .... hope this makes sense .... Gil (one rivet row) Alexander > >Hi, > >RE: RV-6 part C603, DWG 51 > >The sideview on this drawing show two rows of rivets along the length of >this piece. One at the bottom, and one at the top (through the canopy). > >Section A-A on the same drawing show three rows of rivets along the >length. > >Which is correct? or perhaps I am not seeing this correctly. > >Thanks in advance, >Glenn Gordon ------------------------------------ RV6A, #20701, finishing kit "REPLY" sends to entire RV-list mailto:gila(at)flash.net to reply privately ________________________________________________________________________________
From: PAUL_ROSALES(at)prodigy.com (MR PAUL A ROSALES)
Date: Aug 14, 1997
Subject: Toyota Cup Holder
-- [ From: Paul A. Rosales * EMC.Ver #2.5.3 ] -- I stopped by the Toyota dealer to check out the sliding cup/can holder that's been discussed. It measures about 1.25"H X 7.5"L X 6" deep and not much weight to it (ounces). Part number for the dual slider is 55620-89101 and price quoted was $49.23. Thanks to all for the engine information. Paul Rosales, RV-6A N628PV, fuselage coming out of the jig this week. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1997
From: "Patrick E. Kelley" <patk(at)mail.ic.net>
Subject: Re: Finger Drilling
Henson, Eric wrote: > > (Slow day on the list) > > Curt, I'm concerned about your recently drilled finger. You darn kids are > taking this body piercing thing way too far. You did of course allow for > proper edge clearance between the quick and the bone. If you plan to > countersink that finger make sure you anchor the pilot head securely in the > bone, wouldn't want to elongate. I personally recomend you countersink all > appendages, it makes a handy dimple guage for future refrences. By the way > I've heard rumors that spring back dimple dies allow for faster healing - > hence the name. Ok, I have to know: what is the proper drilling technique for flesh and bone? I'd hate to drill a finger only to have the part crack. Are there special speeds? Bits? Is there a publication to cover this? Oh, almost forgot, what are the approved swear words? PatK - RV-6A ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1997
From: John Darby <johnd@our-town.com>
Subject: Re: Toyota Cup Holder
Toyota sliding cup/can holder >that's been discussed. It measures about 1.25"H X 7.5"L X 6" deep and >not much weight to it (ounces). Part number for the dual slider is >55620-89101 and price quoted was $49.23. Thanks to all for the engine >information. > >Paul Rosales, Paul; You may want to check the junk yards. My 87 Dakota pick up had a dual cup holder in it that is very similar to my 97 Toyota. Maybe a little larger. If there are many pick ups in your area, then certainly by now there are some in the yards, and maybe the price much lower. John Darby RV6 sold Stephenville TX johnd@our-town.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1997
From: Richard Bibb <rbibb(at)fore.com>
Subject: Re: Elevator leading edge
The rivits on the leading edge of the empennage at not flat head pop rivets so therefore are not dimpled. You will not see them when installed. > >Listers: > >I have completed rolling the leading edge of the elevator. Are the rivet >holes for the pop rivets dimpled? I can't find anything in the plans or >George's video which say one way or another. > >TIA > > > > >John Ciolino RV-8 >jbc1(at)Ziplink.net > > > > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > | --- | > | Please aggressivly edit quoted text on a followup posting! | > +-- --+ > > Richard E. Bibb Direct: 301-571-2507 Vice President, Federal Operations Main: 301-564-4404 Fore Systems Federal, Inc. FAX: 301-564-4408 6905 Rockledge Drive, #800 Pager: 800-719-1246 Bethesda, MD 20817 www.fore.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1997
From: KOZINSKI GARY <kozinski(at)symbol.com>
Subject: Drilling holes/fingers
Drilling holes in your fingers can be avoided by always using a block of wood on the back side of the hole. Use the wood in the same fashion that you use a bucking bar. Pick up some scrap hardwood and cut them into small blocks. You will find that not only do you save your fingers but the resultant hole is much cleaner. Using the wood is a good habit to get into. Gary RV-6 s/n 20038 Final Assy. less engine and inst. I'm in NY, Project in MA, No holes in fingers...yet. kozinski(at)symbol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 14, 1997
Subject: Re: Contacts in the San Francisco Bay Area
<< My wife and I are relocating back to the Bay Area and considering building a -6/6A once we get settled in. I see a bunch of finished -6s but have not had an opportunity to fly in one. I'm looking for someone who would be willing to take us for a test flight >> Roy- There is a lot of RV activity going on in the bay area from Silicon Gulch to Concord, Petaluma to Tracy. This covers some area. There are many different builders groups and all the EAA chapters at their respective airports have RV builders in their ranks. My guess would be that there are at least 20 flying RV-6/6As, 30 or so RV-4s and a few RV-3/3As that I am aware of. At LVK (Chapter 663) we have 4 flying RV-6/6As, 5 flying RV-4s and about a dozen 6/6A and 4s in various phases of construction. My own RV-6A is nearing completion. Most of these builders are not on the RV-List. Once you settle in a particular area you can be sure that there are RVs nearby. -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CAGPADDLES(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 14, 1997
Subject: Re: Metal Preparation
Rob, I am also using variprime. The man at Norfolk Paint said that he could sell me $50 worth of cleaning/prep stuff but all that was really necessary was a good naptha based cleaner. He recommended 3M General Purpose Adhesive Cleaner and so far it has worked great on both steel parts and Al. I'll probably get shot in the face here by our more "anal" brethren but so far the cheap and easy solution has worked for me. :>) >Putting on my fire retardent Nomex flight suit and HELMET w/ visor down< Semper Fly Jim Brown RV-6 fwd emp spar ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CAGPADDLES(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 14, 1997
Subject: Re: Compressors
Chris, There is probably more than you could ever want to know in the archives about compressors. Mine has a 6.5 horse 220v motor driving a 10.5cfm @ 90 psi compressor. It is a twin cylinder, oil lubed DeVilbiss, and has a 20 gal tank. It cost around $350 and so far has been trouble free. Mine is much larger than the min requirement. I think most folks on the list might advise you to stay away from the "oil free" compressors mainly because they are very noisy. Hope this helps. Jim Brown Va Beach -6 Vert Stab ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV4Brown(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 14, 1997
Subject: Re: RV-List:Archives - Matte Dralle
Matt: I have been giving this some thought for some time now. After three or four years, the RV-list archives have got to be getting huge. I enjoy the light hearted bantor and responses to various topics but after a couple of days, I doubt whether the information they contain would have any value to any future builder. Saving all responses to the RV-list renders the archives less effective. For example (not picking on anyone, I like to laugh too!) If I were to look up "Cracked canopies" I'ld find quite a few responses from people who accidently drilled into their fingers or their spouses appendages. Would it be possible to edit the archives? I noticed that many times the subject matter doesn't relate to the response. The subject line is mispelled and therefore would not turn up in a data search. Postings related to dated timely events such as flyins probably do not need to be permanently saved. Looking for rides or Oshkosh housing etc. Does it make sense to store the same answer three or four times? I have noticed many posts that include the whole non-edited previous post along with a response. I am willing to offer my time and energy going forward to review and edit the responses to be stored in the data base on a weekly or monthly basis. I would however suggest a team approach if possible. I don't want to impose my perspective on everyone. The policy I would suggest is when in doubt, leave it in the data base. Perhaps a team of experienced RV4,RV6, RV6A, and RV8 builders could be recruited to participate. Hopefully the torch could be pased from individual to individual from time to time. (Suggest every four to six months) The past archives would represent quite a challenge to review. I believe editing the archives would make all the difference in the world between tons of data and useful information. I am willing to bet the archives can be compressed 75% of their present size and actually be more useful to the end user. As a side note, what is the status of the CD rom archive disks? I don't know how the mechanics of this would work, but I ask that you give it some thought. Perhaps others on the list can suggest a better approach. Since I would insist on having competent people perform this task, I submit my qualifications and background for your consideration: My daytime employment is as the Chief Operating Officer for Ridgewood Power Corp. Ridgewood is a small private placement investment firm that specializes in the Independant Power Industry. We also have substantial holdings in the oil and gas field. BS Mechanical Engineering, MBA finance, Professional Engineer - PA Computer literate CFIA Land, Multi, Instru - 1000 hours Qualified machinist - Have complete machine shop in my work area. Assembled two BD-5's back in the 70's to the point of engine installation. Decided I enjoyed living too much to complete them. Present project is an RV4. Fuselage in the jig being skinned. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mitch Faatz <mfaatz(at)sagenttech.com>
Subject: Trimming the archive
Date: Aug 14, 1997
> > Would it be possible to edit the archives? > ... > Since I would insist on having competent people perform this task... This is a great idea. You wouldn't even need totally qualified people to help edit the database, just some good guidelines. This is because you don't want to edit out information you think is wrong, you are just editing out non-relevant or redundant messages and headers/footers. I'd imagine you would always leave in someone's opinion because it is interesting to see how someone else is doing something and how many are doing it a certain way. But messages like these, kill 'em! I'd be willing to edit a chunk. Mitch Faatz San Jose, CA N727MF (reserved) RV-6AQME fitting fore top skin and instrument panel ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1997
From: Steve Dixon <sdixon(at)jet.laker.net>
Subject: Tank Dimple Dies
Hello Listers I have a set of Cleveland Tool tank dimple dies. (For those that don't know, these dies make the dimple a few thousandths deeper to allow for the Pro Seal.) My question, to those that have used them before, did you dimple the skin and interior parts or just the interior parts? It seems to me that if there is no Pro Seal on the rivet head, just on the inside parts and the rivet shank, that dimpling the skin with tank dies would make the dimple too deep. Does this make any sence? If you have used them before, please let me know what you did and how you liked the results. Thanks Steve Dixon RV-8 Left Tank Ft. Lauderdale, FL sdixon(at)laker.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1997
From: Jan <Jan(at)claver.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Leading edge on elevators
I have just finished bending the leading edge on the right hand elevator. I am not relay satisfied with the finished result. Not wanting to clutter up the list with a picture would someone out there who has seen a lot of leading edges mind having a lock at mine ?? I would e-mail you a few picture direct for a second opinion -- Jan RV6 builder in England ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1997
From: wayne bonesteel <wayneb(at)oakweb.com>
Subject: new rv fuel tank sealant
have not seen any info on list about the new tank sealant shown in vans september 1996 accessories catalog, any info would be appreciated, i am ready to assemble my fuel tanks. finishing rv-4 wings wayne bonesteel ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Moore"<dmoore8(at)tuelectric.com>
Date: Aug 14, 1997
Subject: Re: RV6 C-603
Glenn Gordon asked about C-603: I assume you are building a tip-up - if not, disregard this. There is a discrepancy in the drawing (surprise!). I used 2 rows of rivets (or should I say, 2 holes - I haven't riveted yet). They are staggered at 2 in. intervals, rows a little less than 1 in apart, and connect the side skin to the canopy frame. There is a third row on top which plasses thru the side skin, canopy, canopy frame, and plastic bar - but this is for #6 screws, not rivets. The point that may be causing confusion is where the canopy frame side rail overlaps the frame forward piece (weldment). chocolatetruffles.com!glenn(at)matronics.com on 08/13/97 09:35:24 PM Please respond to rv-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RV-List: RV6 C-603 RE: RV-6 part C603, DWG 51 The sideview on this drawing show two rows of rivets along the length of this piece. One at the bottom, and one at the top (through the canopy). Section A-A on the same drawing show three rows of rivets along the length. Which is correct? or perhaps I am not seeing this correctly. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Lauritsen" <clevtool(at)tdsi.net>
Subject: Re: Tank Dimple Dies
Date: Aug 14, 1997
Dimple the skins as well as the substructure. We wanted the pro seal to squish out between the rivet and the skin to allow for that much more sealing surface. Just wipe the excess off with thinner while it is still wet. The tank dies have another useful purpose. Most people have noticed that the dimple in the skin does not nest with the dimple in the substructure perfectly. For the most part this is corrected when the rivet is set, but a few people have had special substructure dies made. The substructure dies are about .010" deeper to make them nest correctly, the tank dies are .007" deeper to make the rivets perfectly flush with the pro seal under them. Keeping this in mind, you may want to use the tank dies for the rest of the substructure as well as for the tanks. Thanks, Mike Lauritsen Cleaveland Aircraft Tool 2225 First St. Boone, IA 50036 1-800-368-1822 clevtool(at)tdsi.net http://www.cleavelandtool.com > > I have a set of Cleveland Tool tank dimple dies. (For those that don't > know, these dies make the dimple a few thousandths deeper to allow for > the Pro Seal.) My question, to those that have used them before, did you > dimple the skin and interior parts or just the interior parts? It seems > to me that if there is no Pro Seal on the rivet head, just on the inside > parts and the rivet shank, that dimpling the skin with tank dies would > make the dimple too deep. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1997
From: Mike Wills <willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil>
Subject: Re: Tank Dimple Dies
Steve, I havent quite gotten there yet, but Mike at Cleaveland told me to do both. He said that just enough pro seal will ooze up between the rivet head and the skin that if you dont use the tank die on your skins also, the rivet head will protrude slightly. I'll let you know for sure shortly. Mike Wills RV-4 (wings; tanks this coming weekend) willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil My question, to those that have used them before, did you >dimple the skin and interior parts or just the interior parts? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Tedd McHenry <tedd(at)idacom.hp.com>
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
Date: Aug 14, 1997
> > Has anyone ever had excess heat cause a problem with their electronic > cockpit displays? I've seen cockpit heat blacken an LCD engine > monitor until the cockpit temperature dropped (about 10 minutes after > the canopy was tipped up). > I'd also be interested in anyone's experience with operating LCDs in very cold weather. I've had the disply on my wrist watch go blank when skiing in very cold weather. Does anyone know what the minimum-temperature limit for the Vision LCD display is? Tedd McHenry Surrey, BC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BARNES_ERIC(at)tandem.com
Date: Aug 14, 1997
Subject: Handling Primer w/ease
I got this idea from Ed Cole. I've passed this along privately to a few people as they start their projects, and everyone loves it, so I'll post it. Buy a couple large plastic bottles of your favorite bottled water (evion, crystal springs, etc.), but make sure you get one with the pull top. After you've emptied the bottle, use it for your primer. No more hassle with cleaning up cans/spills, dipping cups, stirring rods and lids that won't seal. Just shake it up good and squirt into the airbrush container. It makes measuring a breeze, and it' all so fast. Hope this helps a few of you out! EB #80131 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Union Hydraulics" <unionhyd(at)s140.aone.net.au>
Subject: trim/throttle cables
Date: Aug 15, 1997
Does anyone know how to remove the ball from the Van's vernier trim/throttle cable to make it operate smoother?? Alan Chappelow Empennage complete in 134 hours Waiting for wing kit next week Question is for another RV-6 owner ________________________________________________________________________________
From: jdelveau6(at)juno.com
Date: Aug 14, 1997
Subject: Re: Tank Dimple Dies
Steve- I finished my tanks about 2 months ago using the tank dies on both skin and structure. The results are very good! Seems like the head of the rivet comes out flush to meet the surface of the skin as it is set with proseal in between. A dry fit of the rivet in the skin looks really deep but they set great. I made sure there was proseal oozing out around the rivet BEFORE I set it. Be sure to clean the proseal off the outside of the skin as soon as you have finished setting all the rivets. -Jim D. (RV-6 One wing finished, mounting the control surfaces on the other) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MikeT(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 14, 1997
Subject: Re: new rv fuel tank sealant
I talked to the A&P/IA at our local FBO about tank sealing. He worked for a while on the King Air Citation class hardware. He came by my shop and looked at the tank structure. He suggested Proseal C20 for the faying surface (between the parts) sealant and the B2 for filet sealing. I talked to Courtaulds the maker of Proseal and their rep sent me a stack of data on their products. C20 is a thinner sealant that sets in roughly 20 hours and is intended for sealing between parts. Has anyone used used this approach? Courtaulds can be reached at 800-237-6649. I have the spec sheets on B2 and C20 sealants. They also recommended buying the stuff in the ready to mix tubes to ensure the proper amount of the 2 components. I'm told a regular hardware store caulking gun will work with the sealant tubes. Mike Talley skinning the left wing - RV-6 - gonna seal both tanks at once Arlington, WA ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1997
From: pmbs(at)probe.mt.att.com (Paul M Bilodeau +1 +1 732 957 6611)
Subject: Re: Trimming the archive
Matt, I'd also be willing to edit a reasonable amount monthly for a few months until the archive was pared down. Using Unix tools like sed and awk, once the programs were written it would be fairly easy to remove the repetitive text....even a lot of the header information not needed for content value. Paul M. Bilodeau pmbs(at)probe.mt.att.com 732-957-6611 RV-6A Empennage Front Spar Almost Done... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1997
From: Denny Harjehausen <retflygtiger(at)proaxis.com>
Subject: Cabin frame
Anyone with a tip type canopy on the 6....The plan (#39) shows the F632B attach angle on top of the F632A channel. To attach the Channel to the F606 bulk head. It appears that the plan calls for the rivets to go thru the F674 aft top fuselage skin, a shim, the F606 flange, the F632B angle and finally thru the F632A Channel. If you follow me is this correct thus far? If that is correct that would rivet almost thru the inside radius of the F632B angle, in order to get edge distance on the F606 flange. Which doesn't seem right to me. Is the above the way you all have done it? Have I missed the point here? And/or is there a better suggestion? Bill B. must be gone cause I ask earlier up at Van's net...and nothing came back, and he always pops right back. Anyway Thanks! Have a good one! Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH Fuselage-top side Lebanon, OR ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1997
From: "Scott A. Jordan" <SAJ_SLJ(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: Leading edge on elevators
Jan, Can't say that I have looked closely at a lot of leading edges but maybe = I can help. You didn't say what your problem is but since I just finished my leading edges this morning I bet I have a good guess! I had trouble getting a good bend so that the pieces would lay flat. Whe= n riveted together, the skin would lift between the rivets giving a scallop= ed appearance. The solution was two fold. I origionally used a broom handl= e to curve the edges as described in the manual. The handle is about 1" diameter. The manual suggests a 1/2" pipe for this purpose. After my first attempt, I decided to spend $6 on a piece of 1/2" conduit. This allowed a much tighter bend and a better fit. The tighter radius near th= e tips still was not to my liking though, a little hand forming helped a bi= t here as well. Step two was to use a few extra rivets. Putting a rivet where the skin lifted pulled it in nicely, I did this to about the outer third of the rudder and elevators. These rivets could also be put closer to the edge = to hold it tighter if you don't mind the rivets being staggered. Remember, nobody will see th any of this unless they are looking real close. = Probably to see if you got a smooth leading edge and if so how because th= ey had the same problem. Can't take all the credit, another builder suggested the extra rivets. All in all, I don't know that it is really necesary to have a perfectly flush leading edge but those scallops looked like they were putting pressure on cheap pop rivets. Now I feel the load is being distributed better and am not worried about the rivets popping loose. My wife has be= en kidding me about the extra weight though! Hope this is of some help to you. Are you any where near London? I'll have a day off over there on the 26th. Scott A. Jordan 80331 N733JJ elevator fitting tomorrow ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 1997
From: Frank van der Hulst <frankv(at)pec.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Trimming the archive
sagenttech.com!mfaatz(at)matronics.com wrote: > > > Would it be possible to edit the archives? > > ... > > Since I would insist on having competent people perform this > task... > > This is a great idea. You wouldn't even need totally qualified people > > to help edit the database, just some good guidelines. This is because > > you > don't want to edit out information you think is wrong, you are just > editing > out non-relevant or redundant messages and headers/footers. Good idea. But it's a big job; I estimate 32MB from Matt's WWW site, which roughly equates to 32,000 A4 pages. At 1 minute per page, that's about 500 hours of work. If we got 50 people to volunteer, it'd be 10 hours each which seems OK to me. B F Gibbon's search engine is available which requires the archive to be on your own machine. That's fine, except that the archive is 11MB compressed, and you can't add to it. If someone was to work on this a little, it'd be great. Better yet would be to split the archive according to the sub-kit (Emp, Wings, Fus, Fin) or component (HS, VS, Rudder, Engine, Instruments, etc). If we could be rigorous in our use of these things in the Subject: line, Matt might be able to automatically split things off to the correct sub-archive? And add a filter to NOT archive any message with "Chatter" in the Subject: line? > I'd be willing to edit a chunk. Note, that there's nothing to stop someone getting started on this; the entire archive is downloadable from Matt's site. Choose a Volume (I -- VII) & Book (A-Z), download it (200K), clean it up, and (if Matt's willing) send it back. Presumably Matt's search engine and the one at Princeton.edu read these digest files? We do need to coordinate who's doing which book though. I'm willing to do that; volunteers could email me, and I'd allocate the next book to be cleaned up. (Given time zones, allow 24 hour turnaround). Frank. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1997
From: Phil Arter <philip.arter(at)mci2000.com>
Subject: Re: Tank Dimple Dies
Steve Dixon wrote: > > > Hello Listers > > I have a set of Cleveland Tool tank dimple dies. (For those that don't > know, these dies make the dimple a few thousandths deeper to allow for > the Pro Seal.) My question, to those that have used them before, did > you dimple the skin and interior parts or just the interior parts? It > seems to me that if there is no Pro Seal on the rivet head, just on the > inside parts and the rivet shank, that dimpling the skin with tank dies would > make the dimple too deep. Does this make any sence? > > If you have used them before, please let me know what you did and how > you liked the results. > > Thanks > Steve Dixon > RV-8 Left Tank > Ft. Lauderdale, FL > sdixon(at)laker.net > I used the tank dies on all the wing skeleton parts, and the regular dies on the skins. This makes the dimples nest together better, and I am very pleased with the results. I did the same thing on the tanks, and the rivets still came out quite nice even though they had Proseal under the heads. Using the tank dies on both tank ribs and skins might have looked a little nicer, but I thought it would be better to get as tight a fit as possible between ribs and skin. Although you don't put Proseal on the rivet heads, the Proseal squeezes out the holes when you cleco the parts together. I removed most of it using a Q-tip with the cotton end pulled off (the flexible kind), but left a smear of Proseal in the dimples all around the holes. Anyway, I found there wasn't enough time to try and remove all the Proseal from around the holes, and I think you do want Proseal under the rivet heads to help make a better seal. You can wipe the excess off with acetone. -- Phil Arter, RV-8 #80005 philip.arter(at)mci2000.com http://acd.ucar.edu/~arter/RV8.html (303)459-0435 home ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1997
From: Dave Barnhart <barnhart(at)a.crl.com>
Subject: Re: new rv fuel tank sealant
wayne bonesteel wrote: > >have not seen any info on list about the new tank sealant shown in vans >september 1996 accessories catalog, any info would be appreciated, i am >ready to assemble my fuel tanks. As I understand it (as relayed to me by Bill Benedict), the new stuff is the same as ProSeal. The patent has now expired, and other people can make the stuff now without a patent license. Regards, Dave Barnhart rv-6 sn 23744 N601DB Avionics, instruments, electrical done installing engine ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 14, 1997
Subject: Sam James "Fiberglass 101" school/RV fly-in
ATTENTION ALL FIBERGLASS ENTHUSIASTS (or haters) !!! Sept 27, 1997 LaBelle Airport, Florida (X14) Please plan for an 8:00 A.M. arrival FREE pancake breakfast FREE "Fiberglass 101" school, 3 hrs long, starting at 9:00 A.M. NOT FREE Lunch (hamburgers) available from a local vendor after school for a small charge Please RSVP to Sam James 941-675-4493 Sam makes the '101' tape, available thru Van's. If you are contemplating a career in doing the fiberglass on your RV, either the tape or this school is a must. Sam will have his 2 pc wheelpants (and many other RV related parts), and my 1 pc fiberglass gear leg fairings on display also. Check six! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Bumflyer(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 14, 1997
Subject: Re: trim/throttle cables
This was covered in the August 96 RV ATOR. If you are careful and lucky, you can retain the rubber push button and re glue it. I did it and am very pleased with the action of the throttle; however you lose the vernier function. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1997
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)navix.net>
Subject: Re: trim/throttle cables
>Does anyone know how to remove the ball from the Van's vernier >trim/throttle cable to make it operate smoother?? > >Alan Chappelow Alan, Awhile back, I modified a Van's throttle cable for a fellow RV-6 builder. He didn't want the vernier function and I agree. You un-thread the aluminum end on the end of the throttle and push the throttle in. You'll see the ball on the end of the cable and the cable can be easily removed. You can then press the button on the control and pull the rod out of the housing. The ball will fall out, roll around on the floor and never be seen again. I discarded the rubber button and found a "snap plug", you know, the little covers with prongs around the circumference that snap into holes, the correct size, chucked it into my lathe and polished it and glued it into a recessed groove that I machined on the plastic knob. The builder clear coated the polished metal and it looks pretty good. I don't feel that you should do anything to the trim cable. It works well right out of the box and it doesn't require much movement to trim the aircraft. Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)navix.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1997
From: John Ammeter <ammeterj(at)seanet.com>
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
Regards Liquid Crystal Displays: I was concerned about the performance of a particular solid state electronic meter under high heat, high voltage and high current conditions. It was easy to apply 277 volts and 20 amps to the meter (its limit) but had to use an oven at work to attain 200 degrees F. The display was ok at 150 degrees but when I tried 200 degrees it turned completely black. It did clear after about two or three minutes as it cooled. An LCD is susceptible to heat but I doubt our cockpits reach temperatures over 150 degrees. John >> >> Has anyone ever had excess heat cause a problem with their electronic >> cockpit displays? I've seen cockpit heat blacken an LCD engine >> monitor until the cockpit temperature dropped (about 10 minutes after >> the canopy was tipped up). >> John Ammeter ammeterj(at)seanet.com 3233 NE 95th St Seattle WA, 98115 USA 206-525-5445 RV-6 N16JA First flight August 1990 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 14, 1997
From: Mike Hartmann <hartmann(at)sound.net>
Subject: Re: Tank Dimple Dies
> >I have a set of Cleveland Tool tank dimple dies. (For those that don't > >the Pro Seal.) My question, to those that have used them before, did you >dimple the skin and interior parts or just the interior parts? It seems > I used them on my second tank with extremely good results. Rivets on the first tank using standard dies fairly good. Rivets on the second tank using the dies were perfectly flush. I used them on the skin and as much of the corresponding underlying structure as possible. If you make a slightly deeper dimple in the skin, it stands to reason that you will want a slightly dimple un the skeleton for it to nest into. You could achieve similar results by slightly countersinking into a standard dimple, but it is much more work. The tank dies are well worth the price. Highly recommended. - Mike hartmann(at)sound.net http://www.sound.net/~hartmann ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 1997
From: Tom Martin <fairlea(at)execulink.com>
Subject: throttle quadrants
I am looking for something a little different then the standard quadrant that I have in my RV-4. It did not have enough movement for my bendix throttle body and had to be modified. Does any one know of another source of quadrants. Tom Martin RV-4 the RaVen, flying again! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 1997
From: Kevin & Theresa Horton <khorton(at)cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: Trimming the archive
> <-- stuff snipped--> >Better yet would be to split the archive according to the sub-kit (Emp, >Wings, Fus, Fin) or component (HS, VS, Rudder, Engine, Instruments, >etc). If we could be rigorous in our use of these things in the Subject: >line, Matt might be able to automatically split things off to the >correct sub-archive? And add a filter to NOT archive any message with >"Chatter" in the Subject: line? >> >Note, that there's nothing to stop someone getting started on this; the >entire archive is downloadable from Matt's site. Choose a Volume (I -- >VII) & Book (A-Z), download it (200K), clean it up, and (if Matt's >willing) send it back. Presumably Matt's search engine and the one at >Princeton.edu read these digest files? We do need to coordinate who's >doing which book though. I'm willing to do that; volunteers could email >me, and I'd allocate the next book to be cleaned up. (Given time zones, >allow 24 hour turnaround). > >Frank. > I would be willing to do some of this. We do need to figure out some guidelines on how we are going to do it. We need to make sure that we leave whatever header info that is needed by the search engines. It wouldn't make much sense to spend all this time paring the archive if the search engines couldn't use the results. So, would someone who understands the search engine please post some guidelines on which headers are required. We should also hear from Matt before we launch into this endeavour. Great idea though, Kevin Horton future RV-8 builder (Rv-8 tail kit and tools ordered) khorton(at)cyberus.ca Engineering Test Pilot Transport Canada Ottawa, Canada ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 1997
From: lottmc(at)datastar.net (Michael C. Lott)
Subject: Fairings
Does anyone offer pre-fab fairings for the gear leg to fuselage, and gear leg to wheel intersections? If they do, I want 'em. Thanks. (RV-4) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rimbold(at)apollo.hp.com
Date: Aug 15, 1997
(probe.mt.att.com!pmbs(at)matronics.com)
Subject: Re: Trimming the archive
> I'd also be willing to edit a reasonable amount monthly for a few > months until the archive was pared down. Using Unix tools like sed and > awk, once the programs were written it would be fairly easy to remove > the repetitive text....even a lot of the header information not needed > for content value. > > Paul M. Bilodeau Here's a shell script that will remove the "unnecessary" header information from any file containing saved email text. Running this on the archives as a whole would be a good idea before sending pieces out to be further edited. These lines account for a small, but significant, portion of the total size. #!/bin/ksh # # t r i m _ m a i l # # This script accepts arguments which are tested to determine if they are # writable files. If so, the files are stripped of noninteresting mail # header lines. The files' original modification times are retained. # # Environment Variables: # # LOGNAME - this variable is used to remove lines following the # 'Received:' lines that begin with "\tfor $LOGNAME" # It is expected that LOGNAME is set to the user's account # name. If LOGNAME is not set, a nonsense string is # substituted so sentences indented by a tab and starting # with the word 'for' aren't stripped. # if no arguments are passed, print usage string and return if (( $# < 1 )) then print "usage: $0 mail_file [mail_file ...]" return 1 fi # while there are arguments left... while (( $# >= 1 )) do # if the file looks like it was compressed with compress(1), skip it if [[ $1 = *.Z ]] then shift continue fi # if given a writable file, strip it if [[ -f $1 && -w $1 ]] then big_file=$1 little_file=$1.$$.TRIM # get the original size before stripping before=$(wc -c $big_file | cut -d\ -f 1) # strip the original file (big_file) of common extraneous header # lines and put the results in little_file sed -e "/^[ > ]*Received: /d" \ -e "/^[ > ]* id A/d" \ -e "/^[ > ]* for ${LOGNAME:=JjUuNnKk}/d" \ -e "/^[ > ]*Snarfer: /d" \ -e "/^[ > ]*Message-Id: /d" \ -e "/^[ > ]*Mailer: /d" \ -e "/^[ > ]*Status: /d" \ -e "/^[ > ]*X-Hpvue\$Revision: /d" \ -e "/^[ > ]*Mime-Version: /d" \ -e "/^[ > ]*Content-Type: /d" \ -e "/^[ > ]*X-Vue-Mime-Level: /d" \ -e "/^[ > ]*X-Envelope-To: /d" \ -e "/^[ > ]*X-Courtesy-Of: /d" \ -e "/^[ > ]*X-Mailer: /d" \ -e "/^[ > ]*X-Status: /d" \ -e "/^[ > ]*Forwarded-By: /d" \ -e "/^[ > ]*Content-Length: /d" \ -e "/^[ > ]*Content-Transfer-Encoding: /d" \ $big_file >$little_file # adjust the date/time of little_file to match big_file touch -r $big_file $little_file # get the new size after stripping after=$(wc -c $little_file | cut -d\ -f 1) # remove big_file and move little_file in its place rm $big_file mv $little_file $big_file # print results print "$big_file: removed $(( before - after )) bytes" fi # shift the arguments and go around again shift done -- 'Rob Rob Rimbold Hewlett Packard Company Workstation Systems Division ISV Technical Consulting Lab Email: rimbold(at)apollo.hp.com Tel: (561) 489-0092 Fax: (561) 489-6865 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Moore"<dmoore8(at)tuelectric.com>
Date: Aug 15, 1997
Subject: Re: Cabin frame
proaxis.com!retflygtiger(at)matronics.com on 08/14/97 07:04:08 PM Please respond to rv-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RV-List: Cabin frame Denny asked about the tip-up frame - see below Denny - you are correct. There are a lot of pieces that come together here. The shim, 606 flange, and 632B angle are all intended to equal the thickness of the plexi canopy (3/16 in.), which sandwiches between the 632A channel and aft top fuselage skin. You need to modify the 632A channel by trimming away 1/8 in. on the top facing portion only. This allows the 632B angle to lay across the top of 632A while permitting the sides of the 632A channel to butt up to the 606 web (where a small angle segment joins them). I hope this makes sense. There is barely enough room to get a rivet through the mess. I wouldn't worry about edge distance too much. With all of the angle segments and additional suport, this area will remain quite strong. Don't trim the 674 skin too much now (leave it fat). This is done later with the canopy. Anyone with a tip type canopy on the 6....The plan (#39) shows the F632B attach angle on top of the F632A channel. To attach the Channel to the F606 bulk head. It appears that the plan calls for the rivets to go thru the F674 aft top fuselage skin, a shim, the F606 flange, the F632B angle and finally thru the F632A Channel. If you follow me is this correct thus far? If that is correct that would rivet almost thru the inside radius of the F632B angle, in order to get edge distance on the F606 flange. Which doesn't seem right to me. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ShelbyRV6A(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 15, 1997
Subject: Wingtips - from Bakersfield
I saw these at Oshkosh. Dave Anders on a RV4, Tracy Saylor on a RV6 and most if not all of the Harmon Rockets. Tracy claims an extra 2 mph while the Rocket claim about 5 to 7 mph. They basically taper outward from the leading edge creating a leading edge down the cord line. This reduces the wing tip vortices induced drag. I hope I have the theory correct. Anyway they looked interesting and I thought there might be someone on the list with additional infor. Shelby in Nashville. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 1997
From: Denny Harjehausen <retflygtiger(at)proaxis.com>
Subject: Re: Sam James "Fiberglass 101" school/RV fly-in
> >Sam makes the '101' tape, available thru Van's. If you are contemplating a >career in doing the fiberglass on your RV, either the tape or this school is >a must. > >Sam will have his 2 pc wheelpants (and many other RV related parts), and my 1 >pc fiberglass gear leg fairings on display also. > >Check six! >Mark > I pickup Sam tape from Van's the other day and it was worth every cent to me. I also purchase some time back his Wheel pants and wing fairings. Not that I couldn't have done it without the above, but it sure make it easier for very little extra cost. Have a good one! Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH Fuselage-top side Lebanon, OR ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 1997
From: Charlie Kuss <charliekuss(at)sprintmail.com>
Subject: Re: Trimming the archive
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------61F913C85FB2 Mitch Faatz wrote: snipped Would it be possible to edit the archives? I've been editing and saving articles from the list since I subscribed back in April of this year. I use Netscape's HTML editor to remove all the headers, and other unnecessary verbage. I also remove all the annoying > symbols that show up on quoted parts of messages. I also clean up spelling errors ( at least the ones I catch). When several good ideas are given to solve a problem I list them all in one file. This saves time having to search for ideas on a subject. I can mail copies of these to anyone who wishes to oversee the project. I'm not saying my way is the "only or right" way to do this. It is just "a" way to do it that saves a lot of searching and time. I've got 6 floppy disks full already in 4 months. Everything is catagorized by sub-kit and then sub-catagorized by structure. Separate catagories are made for painting, tools, etc. I'm attaching one such file to give you an idea of what I've done. Charlie Kuss RV-8 rudder --------------61F913C85FB2 les.html"

        Rolling Edges Near Holes

What side do you lay flat on table to check for flatness?

The rib web side, unless the flange is completely uniform all the way around, in which case checking flatness on the flange edge would yield equivalent results.

It also says cut out lightning holes in rings on the HS-405's. In the manual it says to drill pilot holes then use a fly cutter. They have Inch and a half holes already. Am I missing something here?

The early kits required you to fly cut the holes out yourself (perish the thought). The newer kits probably have the holes mostly punched out. Just ensure that the flat portion of the lightening hole is taken out to the edge of the dished area, debur and smooth the edges, then move on. FWIW, I took the lower roller in the Avery tool and chamfered the roller outer edge at a 40 degree angle (complementary angle to 100/2) just enough to clear the dimples.
-GV

Also, does anyone know a way to roll an edge after holes are drilled and dimpled nearby?

I have done this more than once. I found a nifty way to solve it was to make a spacer out of a 1/8" thick wood, disk-shaped, the dia. of the edge rolling tool, cut out the middle for the rollers, and tape it to the tool to serve as a spacer. Then I could use the tool and miss the rollers. Actually since I have forgotten more than once to roll the edge before dimpling, I keep the spacer around and have used it several times. It is harder to keep from rolling off the edge, but it works.
Randall Henderson, RV-6 randall(at)edt.com

--------------61F913C85FB2-- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rimbold(at)apollo.hp.com
Date: Aug 15, 1997
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
> The display was ok at 150 degrees but when I tried 200 degrees it > turned completely black. It did clear after about two or three > minutes as it cooled. > > An LCD is susceptible to heat but I doubt our cockpits reach > temperatures over 150 degrees. > > John Ammeter > Seattle WA In Florida (where I live), I bet that they reach the 140/150 range. Has anyone ever measured maximum cockpit temperature on a hot summer day, preferably in Florida? TV news shows always quote "temperatures in excess of 140 degrees" when talking about pets or children left in cars on a hot day. So far, the conversation hasn't really convinced me that LCDs are OK to use as instrument display devices. Their temperature extremes (hot or cold) are rather likely to be reached. Earlier, I asked if anyone had encountered problems, and there hasn't been much of a response. I guess now's the time to ask another question. How many people are using LCD displays? What part of the country do you live/fly in? 'Rob ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 1997
From: Charlie Kuss <charliekuss(at)sprintmail.com>
Subject: Trimming the archives- blunder
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------644569B23E69 Oops! I really goofed. My girls son jumped in to use my computer while I was composing my last email & editing several tips from the list. I ended up attaching the wrong file to my last message. (You'll note that the ideas listed were not on the same subject) I was supposed to edit that one and send you this one instead. It's a much better representation of what I've done. (At least it's on one subject and makes sense! :-) ) Charlie Kuss RV-8 rudder If at first you don't succeed, email again! --------------644569B23E69 Strobe%20Kit%20from%20Gall's.html"

      Wehlen Strobe Kit from Gall's

I received a techncal data sheet from Gall's on their standard strobe power supply and thought I would share the basic specs.

Gall's Inc. 2680 Palumbo Dr. Lexington, KY 40555-4308 1-800-477-7766

Wheelen Power Supply Model# U-GR083 Price New $99.99 Price reman. $74.99

First: This unit is made by Wheelen and is their model SPS-660C. Up to six strobes can be powered by this single unit.  
Specs:
Voltage - Input           10v - 30vDC
Current(12v)               6 AMPS
Current(26.5v)            3 AMPS
Flash Rate                   140 F/M typical
Flash Patterns              Single (Comet)
(selectable)                  Rapid Double
Joules - High               11/5/5/5
typical Joules - Low     4/4/4/4 typical
Output Power              60 WATTS
Dimensions                  Could not read on fax.
Weight                         Not stated, but shipped as less than 2lbs.
Cost New                    $99.00 - 5 year warranty
Refurb                          $75.00 - 90 day warranty

Could be a good alternative to the Wheelen FAA approved models. --
Rick Osgood Hennipen Technical College Eden Prairie, MN

Guys, ... I wouldn't use these units. This particular mix and match won't meet the FAA output requirements.
If the specs. below are correct, this Power Supply does not produce enough output (the 11 joules figure) to meet the FAA required output of 400 effective candles. For the Whelen A600 and A650 units (the wing tip mount units), a power of 12 joules per flash will only produce 380 effective candles (ref. the table in the ASS catalog). The Whelen recommended power supply for multiple units (A413) produces 25 joules per flash, and the single strobe supply (A490) produces 20 joules per flash. This power output is considerably more than the max. 11 joules quoted below - I don't fully understand the ratings below, and might also assume that you get even less power (the 5 joules figure) if you use this supply for multiple strobe heads.
The FAA does not give us many specific items that we have to meet, but the power output and angular distribuion of the strobe light outut is one that is given VERY specifically. Whelen (and Aeroflash) have done their tests to produce an "FAA compliant system" .... if you mix and match in this fashion, you should be prepared to prove your light output is compliant.
This also goes for mounting styles, the angular mounting (unit not horizontal) of the wingtip strobes directly on the tips of some RVs is probably not compliant since the strobes have a "lens effect" built into the pyrex cover to concentrate the light output in the horizontal plane. Tilt the unit and you tilt the light distribution, which is called out specifically in the FAA regulations, with a maximum in the horizontal plane. Look at the variation in thickness of the pyrex cover some time.
The same problem also occurs if you mount a single strobe that was designed for wing tip mounting in the RV fin at 90 degrees to it's factory recommended direction. This would be great for an anti-collision warning for a vertically diving collision hazard, but MUCH less effective for the normal collision hazard that is at the same altitude as you are...:^)
Pick a Power Supply with more output (the aircraft unit?).

.... Gil (read the regs.) Alexander

--------------644569B23E69-- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 1997
From: Robert Acker <r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Wingtips - from Bakersfield
>vortices induced drag. I hope I have the theory correct. Anyway they looked >interesting and I thought there might be someone on the list with additional >infor. >Shelby in Nashville. When I spoke to Tracy, he indicated the stock wingtips had a little pre-stall buffet, the "rocket" tips have no stall warning whatsoever. Rob Acker / r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com / RV-6Q in slowbuild mode :( ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ross Mickey" <rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Cabin frame
Date: Aug 15, 1997
Denny, This didn't seem right to me so I added another piece to the mess you described. On the aft-underside of F-632-A, I riveted in a .032 plate bent at 100 degrees to match the bend of F632-B. This piece is riveted to F632-A using flush 3-3.5 rivets. It is riveted through F632-B and the F606 bulkhead using the existing holes. This then gives me a good strong intersection to drill and rivet the top skins through the flange of the F606 bulkhead and F632-B. It is probably overkill but I didn't like the way it looked without the extra plate. Ross Mickey rmickey@ix,netcom.com > If that is correct that would rivet almost thru the inside radius of > the F632B angle, in order to get edge distance on the F606 flange. Which > doesn't seem right to me. --+ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mikel(at)dimensional.com
Date: Aug 15, 1997
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
>In Florida (where I live), I bet that they [cockpits in the sun] reach the 140/150 range.... Seems to me that I would probably go completly blank sitting in a cockpit in the 140-150 degree range. Once the cockpit cools down to "personal comfort" level the displays would probably not be affected. They are not on, nor needed while the cockpit is baking in the hot sun and will probably cool enough as the cockpit cools with you in it. If there was a question, a cooling air source (one is keeping me cool) may also work on the instruments. Just some thoughts.......... Michael ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV4131rb(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 15, 1997
Subject: Re: new rv fuel tank sealant
Mike, I used the same approach your talking about on my fuel tanks. The numbers are not the same however it sounds like the same stuff. The sealant I used is used on boeing and douglas aircraft. The difference in numbers has to do with thickness and cure time. I used the thinner sealant between ribs and skin, when the sealant dried I went over the flanges and rivets on the inside of the tank with the thicker sealant. I am now at 420hrs with no leaks. BTW I used 2 different approaches on my fuel tanks, I dimpled one side and machine counter sunk the other. The dimpling is the only way to go. The side that I machined is noticeable. The new tank dies sound great and I will be purchasing a set for my next set of tanks.(next airplane) Ryan ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 1997
From: Richard TREANOR <treanor(at)ci.sunnyvale.ca.us>
Subject: Re: Wingtips - from Bakersfield -Reply
<> Question: The fighter aircraft that I'm familiar with have a slight twist built into the wing so that stall begins at the wing root and moves outward as the stall deepens. Ailerons are the last thing to be effected. During Air Combat Maneuvering where you want to out-turn your adversary, you pull into the slight buffet of stall onset (edge of the envelope stuff). I was surprised to hear that the wing tips would offer stall warning...seems bass ackwards to an old fighter pilot. Haven't got to the wings yet, but do the wings have any twist...or no need? Rich Treanor ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 1997
From: Jeff <jeffr(at)phonetech.com>
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
>> The display was ok at 150 degrees but when I tried 200 degrees it >> turned completely black. It did clear after about two or three >> minutes as it cooled. >> >So far, the conversation hasn't really convinced me that LCDs are OK >to use as instrument display devices. Their temperature extremes (hot >or cold) are rather likely to be reached. > I have looked up some data sheets and found that the operating temperature range for LCD's is from about 15 degrees to 140 degrees F, though some are worse. I did find some wide range units that work from about -5 to 160 degrees F, which appears to be about the limit for present day LCD's. The storage temperature ranges are greater, of course, where they typically will withstand nearly 20 degrees higher/lower than the operating temperature without damage. Though a hot aircraft interior might not be high enough to damage an LCD, it might be hot enough to prevent it from working properly (i.e. the display might be all black until it cools). At the other end of the temperature scale, an aircraft left in the cold during winter might result in LCD damage. Note that LED's (light emitting diodes) do not have this temperature problem, and many can function from about -70 to over 250 degrees F. In short, the only LCD's used in an aircraft should probably be limited to portable equipment that can be kept warm/cool. Jeff Rosson ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 1997
From: Ted French <french@mag-net.com>
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
I have a Grand Rapids engine monitor in my RV-6A. It sits on top of the transponder which sits on top of my comm. There is no cooling air ducted to these instruments. On the way back from Oshkosh this summer I encountered temperatures arount 75 to 80 deg F at 8500 ft ASL. The monitor gradually turned black enough that it was very difficult to see the display. The front face of the unit was quite hot to the touch. Cleared up as temps dropped. In the winter, I rarely fly if it is below -10 deg F. At these temperatures, the display is slow to update, but as the cabin heat & heat from the stack kick in, it soon works normally. The airplane has sat in an unheated hanger at 50 deg below F with no apparant ill effects to the monitor. I would expect that the Vision Microsystems display would behave in a similiar manner. Hope this helps Ted French RV-6A 140 hrs ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rimbold(at)apollo.hp.com
Date: Aug 15, 1997
(dimensional.com!mikel(at)matronics.com)
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
> Seems to me that I would probably go completly blank sitting in a > cockpit in the 140-150 degree range. Once the cockpit cools down to > "personal comfort" level the displays would probably not be > affected. The experience I had happened after we parked an RV6A for lunch. The LCD engine monitor display was black when we returned. After having the canopy (which was left uncovered) open for about 10 minutes, it was still black. It took cooling (moving) air about 5 to 10 minutes to get the display back to a readable condition. That's a long time to not know how your engine is doing after startup. Actually, just the air being ducted into the cabin from the prop blast while parked wasn't enough. We took off hoping that cooler air at altitude (3500 ft) would help. It did - after about 5 or 10 minutes. > They are not on, nor needed while the cockpit is baking in the hot > sun and will probably cool enough as the cockpit cools with you in > it. If there was a question, a cooling air source (one is keeping > me cool) may also work on the instruments. True, but in this case it meant (at the least) starting the engine without being able to monitor oil pressure or any other parameter. With a Vision system, it would probably mean not being able to monitor much more. 'Rob ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 15, 1997
Subject: Re: Wingtips - from Bakersfield
<< When I spoke to Tracy, he indicated the stock wingtips had a little pre-stall buffet, the "rocket" tips have no stall warning whatsoever. >> Hmmmmmmmm....... Sounds like they're doing the job of keeping the vortex away from the top of the wing. If you think about it, a square, un-twisted wing (like the RV's have) should stall along it's entire length at the same time. I would suggest that the wing/fuse intersection would influence this in some manner. A buffet is felt when only a part of the wing is stalled, right? Did Tracy say anything about the stall characteristics? Is the stall still pretty tame, or does the bird try to roll over on it's back? I asked Dave Anders if he thought there was any advantage, and he said he observed a 2 MPH gain, but I didn't think to ask him about any other flight character changes. Dave explained the tip as having a "leading edge" all the way back to the trailing edge. John Harmon added that the aileron shake went away, due to the vortex remaining outside the tip longer and not touching the outer edge of the aileron top skin. I think he has to throttle back to stay sub-sonic, too. ;-) BTW, I have an extra set of these things in my shop. A customer changed his mind, so they are up for grabs. No light kit. Not cheap, either. Check six! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 1997
From: Dennis Jackson <denny(at)transport.com>
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
apollo.hp.com!rimbold(at)matronics.com wrote: > > > > The display was ok at 150 degrees but when I tried 200 degrees it > > turned completely black. It did clear after about two or three > > minutes as it cooled. > > > > An LCD is susceptible to heat but I doubt our cockpits reach > > temperatures over 150 degrees. > > > > John Ammeter > > Seattle WA > > In Florida (where I live), I bet that they reach the 140/150 range. > Has anyone ever measured maximum cockpit temperature on a hot summer > day, preferably in Florida? TV news shows always quote "temperatures > in excess of 140 degrees" when talking about pets or children left in > cars on a hot day. > > So far, the conversation hasn't really convinced me that LCDs are OK > to use as instrument display devices. Their temperature extremes (hot > or cold) are rather likely to be reached. > > Earlier, I asked if anyone had encountered problems, and there hasn't > been much of a response. I guess now's the time to ask another > question. How many people are using LCD displays? What part of the > country do you live/fly in? > Rob: I have several LCD displays in my -4, including a King KLX-135A and the Rocky Mountain instruments. I have not had any heat problems from any of them and I'm sure I never will since I will make sure my cockpit is well below 140F before I take off. I suggest you do the same unless you are exceptionally resistant to heat stroke. I think it would be more likely to have an extremely cold cockpit if you fly in a northern climate. As I recall, the lower end of the temperature scale causes these displays to fade and lose contrast and to become very sluggish in response, so if you had your plane someplace really cold there would be a time after startup before the heater kicked in and warmed things up that you wouldn't be able to read the displays. But I couldn't say as I've never flown when the temp has been all that cold. Here in Portland, OR our temps are always relatively mild. There are several different types of LCD's and temperature limits vary accordingly. Some will take temps as high as 220F. Any will take at least 140F. I seem to remember hearing that an LCD can be permanently damaged by extreme cold (-60F) although some are designed to still work at -40F. Garmin's spec on their GPS-89 shows +5F as the lower limit. Certainly not a temp you'd want to sit in very long! DJ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 1997
From: lottmc(at)datastar.net (Michael C. Lott)
Subject: Elevator tube
I was checking the elevator tube (the one that broke on the rv-4 last week) on my -4 today just for the heck of it. I noticed that when you put in full aileron deflection to the left it caused the bottom section of the bell crank to flex about 1/8", and to the right the flex was about 1/16". This is with the recommended full deflection of the ailerons. This seems to be something that would cause a lot of stress on the tube, and some on the bell crank. I see no way to stop this without using a type of bearing that has more deflection angle to it. I don't know the technical terms for that. I know that full deflection is seldom used, but how many flexes does it take to crack the tubing or the bell crank? Has anyone else noticed this problem with their plane? Does anyone have any idea how I can fix this one? Thanks. Michael. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 1997
From: Denny Harjehausen <retflygtiger(at)proaxis.com>
Subject: Re: Cabin frame
On the aft-underside of F-632-A, I riveted in a .032 plate >bent at 100 degrees to match the bend of F632-B. This piece is riveted to >F632-A using flush 3-3.5 rivets. It is riveted through F632-B and the F606 >bulkhead using the existing holes. This then gives me a good strong >intersection to drill and rivet the top skins through the flange of the >F606 bulkhead and F632-B. Ross that looks like a solution I may use. I made a new F-688, extending it out the same distance as the F632B angle. By the time I got the F632A notched for the F632B to fit flush with the F606, there was nearly 1/4" notch out of it. So it looks like the F606 would be a better anchored to F632A with the addition of your angle idea under the F632A. Thanks For the idea. Have a good one! Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH Fuselage-top side Lebanon, OR ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 1997
From: "r.acker" <r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Wingtips - from Bakersfield -Reply
>warning...seems bass ackwards to an old fighter pilot. Haven't got to the >wings yet, but do the wings have any twist...or no need? >Rich Treanor Its my understanding that RV wings should be flat, no washout at the tips. Rob Acker / r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com / RV-6 Quickbuild in slowbuild mode... :( ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 1997
From: "r.acker" <r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
> In >short, the only LCD's used in an aircraft should probably be limited to >portable equipment that can be kept warm/cool. >Jeff Rosson Why do ALL major avionics manufacturers making bunches of LCD display equipment that's panel mounted (RMI, King, ICOM, Garmin, Apollo, etc. etc.) continue to do so? Everyone, including myself, who uses them has no complaints save for *major* (below zero and Sahara) temperature extremes. Rob Acker / r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com / RV-6 Quickbuild in slowbuild mode... :( ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JRWillJR(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 16, 1997
Subject: Re: Dropping objects
I do not think opening the tip up canopy in flight to be a good idea. Used to do the toilet paper drop in my AA1-C but never could hit the thing. TOO fast and it to slow. Do it often in my Kitfox. Once almost re-caught the roll but nearly fell out trying - felt that way anyhow. RV too fast for low alt. maneuvering. Kitfox stall at 26 mph--- more room for error. Do not try it. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 16, 1997
From: catbird(at)taylortel.com (TTC Carroll A. Bird)
Subject: Re: Elevator tube
Michael C. Lott wrote: > > I noticed that when you > put in full aileron deflection to the left it caused the bottom section > of the bell crank to flex > Has anyone else noticed this problem with their plane? > Does anyone have any idea how I can fix this one? Thanks. Michael. > > Michael, do you have the 5702-75-060 washers installed between the bearing and the bracket that is welded on the bottom of the rear stick. I assume that we are talking about the F 440 pushrod. A pair of these washers are also installed at the other end of F 440 at the bellcrank. I can move the stick as far as it will go without the aileron pushtube installed without any side deflection of the fuselage bellcrank. If these washers are installed, I don't know what to tell you. I got this off of drawing 28. Hope this helps. Carroll ps These washers have 3/16 ID 5/16 OD and are 1/16" thick. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rimbold(at)apollo.hp.com
Date: Aug 16, 1997
(ix.netcom.com!r.acker(at)matronics.com)
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
> Why do ALL major avionics manufacturers making bunches of LCD > display equipment that's panel mounted (RMI, King, ICOM, Garmin, > Apollo, etc. etc.) continue to do so? In my admittedly limited exposure, I haven't seen the major manufacturers using LCDs. They've been using LEDs or electroluminescent displays, which have a much larger temperature range. The only LCDs that I've seen have been on hand-held equipment. > Everyone, including myself, who uses them has no complaints save for > *major* (below zero and Sahara) temperature extremes. And that's probably the case for most people who live in a location where the temperatures aren't extreme. My point is that it's certainly possible to live in a location where those extremes are easily reached. I don't mean that those temperatures are experienced in-flight, but rather on the ground before startup. A long delay (20 minutes or so) can be experienced waiting for the LCD to either heat or cool enough to be functional. I don't relish the idea of sitting parked in an idling plane for 20 minutes if I don't have to - especially if the cockpit temperature has recently cooled to match the ambient 90 degrees. An enclosed cockpit, with lots of area open to the sun, like an RV, is a natural heat concentrator. Temperatures inside the closed cockpit have a good chance of temporarily blackening an LCD display when outside temperatures are only in the upper 80s and low 90s. Keeping the canopy cracked open while parked would help a lot, as would covering it or hangaring it. There's isn't much to be done on the low end of the temperature scale. If the LCD reaches -10 or so, it's outside the range specified by the manufacturer. Permanent damage could result, and those temperatures *do* happen in the U.S (I'm originally from New England). I'm still looking for anecdotal evidence that this is really a problem (or not). I'd really like to use something like a Vision Microsystems unit if it won't cause problems in the Florida climate. 'Rob ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 16, 1997
From: lottmc(at)datastar.net (Michael C. Lott)
Subject: Re: Dropping objects
At our local airport open houses we used to chase helium balloons (one plane at a time). It was a lot of fun trying to bust them with the prop. It was hard to belive they could pass through the prop and bounce off your windshield unhurt, sometimes. It was equally fun, wether in an old bonanza or an old tripacer. Of course the slower piper gave more time for last minute adjustment in course. Someone on the ground would release one and when it got to a predetermined altitude it was legal for you to start the chase, if you could see it. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 16, 1997
From: lottmc(at)datastar.net (Michael C. Lott)
Subject: Re: Elevator tube
I will double check for the washers on the tube ends. Will let you know. Thanks alot. Michael ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 16, 1997
From: "Paul Osterman III" <PineRanch(at)msn.com>
Subject: Finger Drilling
Henson, Eric wrote: > (Slow day on the list) > > Curt, I'm concerned about your recently drilled finger. You darn kids are > taking this body piercing thing way too far. You did of course allow for > proper edge clearance between the quick and the bone. If you plan to > countersink that finger ... ThenPat K wrote: Ok, I have to know: what is the proper drilling technique for flesh and bone? I'd hate to drill a finger only to have the part crack. Are there special speeds? Bits? Is there a publication to cover this? Oh, almost forgot, what are the approved swear words? Pat: Drilling fingerbones really isn't much different than drilling aluminum. There are a few differences though. The technique is blunt dissection to the bone, determine screw diameter to use, drill with irrigation, tap if necessary and place the screw. Yes of course you need special orthopedic drill bits! $36.00 to $125 each. A bargain I admit but one time use only. Drill bit diameters used in the finger and hand are from 1.4mm to 2.4mm, but certainty no bigger than a #40. Now when drilling, copiously irrigate (pour water on the drill bit to keep it cool)...so it helps to plan these procedures well in advance because you'll need to have an assistant do this part. And for God's sake keep your rpm's below 1000 to prevent thermal necrosis (heat induced bone death)! Otherwise the screw(s)will come loose. Screws are a little more than rivets though at about $45 to $165.00 each depending on size and metal type. Smaller and titanium alloys more, large and stainless steel less. (Call me, I've got a few more thanI'll need for my as yet (un)planned procedures).Yes there are published techniques but I've learned, as you may well to that the best practitioners don't need one and in fact probably never saw one. Swear words..hey, you're the surgeon, you can say whatever the hell you want! PaulO ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 16, 1997
From: "r.acker" <r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
>In my admittedly limited exposure, I haven't seen the major >manufacturers using LCDs. I would suspect that King and the others I mentioned are most assuredly in the top 10. They use LCD's on panel mount comm's, gps, etc. >especially if the cockpit temperature has recently cooled to match the >ambient 90 degrees. Though I can't vouch for cold weather or using LCD's in an RV type aircraft, I've used a King KX-97 (major manufacturer LCD comm) in a 172. OAT 100 degrees+ (I live in the southern california desert) not a problem, except for my sweating. My Ford Aerostar's LCD's still displayed, but very slowly, one cold morning in splendorous Winnemucca NV, -28 F. My bird will be all LCD's, so after its flying and I've been exposed to varying weather conditions I'll know if they work or not. Rob Acker / r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com / RV-6 Quickbuild in slowbuild mode... :( ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 16, 1997
From: Glenn & Judi <glenn(at)chocolatetruffles.com>
Subject: Re: Finger Drilling
Hi, I can't believe all this discussion of these whimpy techniques everyone has for drilling fingers. Special drill bits? proper RPM? correct drilling pressures? Bah humbug! That stuff is for the birds! Too much trouble! Who needs it!?! Perhaps you can give my "macho" technique a try. 1. Hold workpiece with hand. Hold drill gun with other hand. 2. Begin drilling (any bit, rpm, and pressure will do) 3. Wait for drill bit to break. 4. At this point the pressure you have on the drill gun will transplate to the forward motion of the drill gun. 5. If you have properly aligned and executed this technique, the freshly broken jagged edge drill bit will penetrate and possibly exit your finger. 6. Bleed. 7. #(*&%!(&*@^$ ! 8. Experience pain. Seriously folks. This is just a warning to keep your hands away from where the drill might go should the bit break. -Glenn Gordon RV-6 Fitting Canpoy ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JRWillJR(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 16, 1997
Subject: Re: Finger Drilling
When backing up a drilling operation with your hand you may want to use a drill stop. This way skin penetration is limited to the epidermis and not the inside stuff. Stop drilling when the curly-que turns from a shiny silver to a flesh color. Anyway, this technique has always worked well for me. I do not know if blood is corrosive to Al. but it cleans up well with alcohol and Hot Stuff on the drill hole(in hand) seems to stop the bleeding quikly so as not to slow your work progress. Does one count repair time on ones hands and appendages toward total build time? Also, the technique can be improved upon by raising up into a sharp Al. skin edge after drilling ones hand so as to require numerous stitches across the forehead. Do you include emergecy room medical cost to total project cost? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 16, 1997
From: lottmc(at)datastar.net (Michael C. Lott)
Subject: Elevator tube
I checked the washers on the bellcrank. Last time I took it apart I ended up with the washers on the outside of the bellcrank when I reassembled it. Thanks alot for the helpful hint. Speaking of drilling fingers, I always heat the drilled finger up with a small propane torch to relieve the stress. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 16, 1997
From: lottmc(at)datastar.net (Michael C. Lott)
Subject: Weight and balance
I did the weight check on my -4 today. I had to use bathroom scales for I had no others available. I took readings with it level front to back and side to side. I took readings on all 3 spots at the same time. I then swapped the scales around and did it again. Swapped them 3 times then averaged the readings. They were sometimes 20 lbs off from the previous readings. I ended up with 51 on tail wheel, 468 on one main, and 453 on the other. That's 972 total. That is with no gyros, or radios. All other instruments and upholstery. How does this compare with others? Has anyone else had experience with bathroom scales than used good airplane scales and found the bathroom scales were off much? I was disappointed with 972. I thought it would be 50 lbs lighter. Oh yes, it is a 0320-e2d, wood prop. The air conditioner wasn't installed yet. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: colquitt(at)ns1.onramp.tuscaloosa.al.us
Date: Aug 16, 1997
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
> Earlier, I asked if anyone had encountered problems, and there hasn't > been much of a response. I guess now's the time to ask another > question. How many people are using LCD displays? What part of the > country do you live/fly in? > > 'Rob Rob, I live in Alabama and I have several LCD displays in my RV-3A. The only problem I have with them is seeing them in certain lighting conditions. I even carry a flashlight so I can see them at times. The need to see LCD from the side is not an issue in a RV-3A. ;-) Joe Colquitt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 16, 1997
From: Glenn & Judi <glenn(at)chocolatetruffles.com>
Subject: RV-6 C612
Hi, RE: RV-6 DWG 51, C612 I am ready to position the canpoy latching/locking mechanism into my RV-6. DWG shows a 2 3/8" dimension to position the C612 assy. Most other measurements of this type have been taken from the top of the longeron. This one seems to be taken from the bottom of the WD625A weldment. Is this correct? -Glenn Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 16, 1997
From: Bill Benedict <billb(at)europa.com>
Subject: Re: Molex plugs
Rick, Check your Van's catalog. We have both the male and female connectors to go on the ends of cables. Bill > >I purchased a Wheelen Strobe power supply at OSH this year but decided >to get the cable and connectors >back in Minneapolis. As I am finding.... these molex connectors are not >in any electronics stores, including >the "Electronics Parts Suppliers". Does anyone have a source on these >connectors??? > >Thanks >Rick Osgood > > > > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > | --- | > | Please aggressivly edit quoted text on a followup posting! | > +-- --+ > > Bill RV-4-180 soon. N894RV with over 400 hours behind a O-320, Over 1000 RV flying hours. These opinions are mine and do not necessarily represent the opinions or position of my employer. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV4131rb(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 17, 1997
Subject: Re: Weight and balance
Mike, Sounds a little heavy with no gyro's or radio's. Did you use light weight starter, alternator, is the plane painted or unpainted? If its painted your probably in the ball park. Mine weighed in at 950lbs with radios and gyro including in dash cd player. Ryan ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MarkVN(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 17, 1997
Subject: Re: Tips, Internet Sources for Information on Riveting
Steve... Your local EAA chapter has mostly RV builders. These guys are great, and are very helpful. If you want more info on this let me know... Markvn(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kerrjb(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 17, 1997
Subject: Re: Weight and balance
<< They were sometimes 20 lbs off from the previous readings. >> Michael, My experience weighing things in the shop with bathroom scales improve in repeatability markedly after I realised it was important to put two supports where your feet would normally be on the scales rather than a single point on the center of the scale like a tire.Try it with a given object with and with out the supports and see if it improves your repeatability. Good luck,Bernie ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 17, 1997
From: Glenn & Judi <glenn(at)chocolatetruffles.com>
Subject: Strobe Pack Location
Hi, RE: RV-6 Strobe Power Pack Location. Can anyone suggest a good place to locate the strobe power pack? The best two locations I have found are: 1. under the floor skins (is there enough room here)? 2. mounted on a shelf under the forward top fuse skin. 3. Obviously behine the baggage area would work, however I am trying to keep stuff as forward (C.G.) in the airplane as possible. I know the wire for the strobes is shielded. Is it still capable of causing interference with instruments or radios? Does location affect the potentional interference? Thanks in advnace, Glenn Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 17, 1997
From: lottmc(at)datastar.net (Michael C. Lott)
Subject: Re: Weight and balance
I used the light weight alternator, regular starter, and lots of paint. I have about three different colors on the wings, one layer over the other. ( I tried schemes till I got to one i liked, and didn't strip previous layers) ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Touch Up Gun Problem
Date: Aug 17, 1997
From: "William H. Watson" <watson1(at)alink.net>
Searched the archives, couldn't find any advice.... I use the small Sears touch up gun to spray Sherman Williams wash primer, 1:2 ratio, like Van uses. A lot of the time, when I first start spraying, the gun sputters and I get a sort of textured finish (looks awful - intense splatter pattern). Then I get something like cotton candy or spider webs forming from the spray. Fiddle, fiddle. After awhile, it seems to clear up, but I never feel like I'm in control of what's happening. Short of confining my flying to Arizona (no primer), what should I try/do? Bill Watson RV-6A Emp almost done ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Persyk" <dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Strobe Pack Location
Date: Aug 17, 1997
Glenn, I helped mount a strobe pack in a friend's 6 and we choose behind the baggage compartment: A) Forward of spar complicates routing the shielded cable to the wing tip -- the cable must be an unspliced run and getting it through or over the spar is tricky. B) We didn't have enough room under floor boards. C) Behind baggage area was easiest but with attendant CG penalty. Good practice is to route RF-carrying cable (like strobe HV) perpendicular to signal-carrying wires. Maximum coupling of RF energy occurs when cables are parallel. Be careful and follow Whellen's instructions exactly on grounding cable. Dennis N9DP (amateur radio call -- FAA sign unfortunately belongs to a balloon!) RV6A in fuselage jig ---------- > From: Glenn & Judi <chocolatetruffles.com!glenn(at)matronics.com> > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > > > > Hi, > > RE: RV-6 Strobe Power Pack Location. > > Can anyone suggest a good place to locate the strobe power pack? > The best two locations I have found are: > 1. under the floor skins (is there enough room here)? > 2. mounted on a shelf under the forward top fuse skin. > 3. Obviously behine the baggage area would work, however I am trying to > keep stuff as forward (C.G.) in the airplane as possible. > > > I know the wire for the strobes is shielded. Is it still capable of > causing interference with instruments or radios? Does location affect > the potentional interference? > > Thanks in advnace, > Glenn Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 17, 1997
From: Royce Craven <roycec(at)ozemail.com.au>
Subject: Re: Cabin frame
Danny, asked the same question (even provided drawings). Tom @ Vans says to rivet through the skin, the triangular bit and the F-606. The Channel and the angle are to be riveted together and then the angle is to riveted to the F-606 WEB not the flange. The shim is just for size and can be left out once you have drilled the angle to the F-606. Is it my imagination or is the canopy "the hardest bit" (Van) and the front area the poorest drawings? Everyone I know asks this question. Anyone know what the joggle in the flange on the top of the F-606 is for? Is it something to do with the slider?? Best of luck Danny. Royce (mounting the VS) Craven > >Anyone with a tip type canopy on the 6....The plan (#39) shows the F632B >attach angle on top of the F632A channel. To attach the Channel to the F606 >bulk head. >It appears that the plan calls for the rivets to go thru the F674 aft top >fuselage skin, a shim, the F606 flange, the F632B angle and finally thru the >F632A Channel. > If you follow me is this correct thus far? > > If that is correct that would rivet almost thru the inside radius of >the F632B angle, in order to get edge distance on the F606 flange. Which >doesn't seem right to me. > > Is the above the way you all have done it? Have I missed the point >here? And/or is there a better suggestion? > >Bill B. must be gone cause I ask earlier up at Van's net...and nothing came >back, and he always pops right back. > > Anyway Thanks! > > >Have a good one! > >Denny, > RV-6 (R)N641DH > Fuselage-top side > Lebanon, OR > > > > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > | --- | > | Please aggressivly edit quoted text on a followup posting! | > +-- --+ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 17, 1997
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)navix.net>
Subject: Re: Touch Up Gun Problem
>I use the small Sears touch up gun to spray Sherman Williams wash primer, >1:2 ratio, like Van uses. A lot of the time, when I first start >spraying, the gun sputters and I get a sort of textured finish (looks >awful - intense splatter pattern). Then I get something like cotton >candy or spider webs forming from the spray. Fiddle, fiddle. After >awhile, it seems to clear up, but I never feel like I'm in control of >what's happening. Short of confining my flying to Arizona (no primer), >what should I try/do? Bill, Have you checked packing nut adjustment? Using around 25 lbs of air (or minimum amount of air necessary to get paint out of the gun)? Needle straight and adjusted properly? Nozzle clean with no clogged passages. Cup gasket in good shape? You might try mixing the S-W according to the label: 1 1/2 reducer to 1 base (?). Is it really warm where you are spraying? Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)navix.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 17, 1997
From: "r.acker" <r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Aluminum Channel
Does anyone know of a source for 2"x3"x2" (.125" thick) 6061 aluminum "U" channel (or rect. tube I could cut one 3" side out of)? I've tried ASS, Airparts, and Wick's already. Thanks, Rob Acker / r.acker(at)ix.netcom.com / RV-6 Quickbuild in slowbuild mode... :( ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Bumflyer(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 17, 1997
Subject: Re: Strobe Pack Location
I used the behind the baggage compartment. Based on my eyeball calculation, worst case is you will be a pound less on your baggage maximum. In my case (with C/S prop and 180HP, lite alt and starter), there are no limits on baggage other than the 100 lb. limit. I like it really fine and have had no problems either with wiring, interference or anything; however my opinion is the easiest solution is to use the double power supplies type with all in one lights on the tips. The price and weight comparisons are very close and the cg is not affected. Drag is slightly higher but those with this system seem to go as fast as the rest. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RMille6453(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 17, 1997
Subject: Fwd: Which O-360?
--------------------- Subj: Which O-360? Date: 97-08-17 13:22:34 EDT From: RMille6453 Hi Guys My mechanic has talked me into using an O-360 on my RV-8. I plan to buy a core and overhaul it with new cylinders and use a constant speed prop. Does anyone have an opinion on which dash number(s) of O-360 would work best? Thanks Rob Miller Fuse on the way ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 17, 1997
From: Dean & Scott Spencer <dspencer(at)kiva.net>
Subject: Re: Touch Up Gun Problem
The 'cotton candy' problem is usually caused by using a thinner/reducer that evaporates too quickly for the temperature range you are working in. Most paint suppliers have many formulations of reducers/thinners available -usually ordered by temperature range. Check into this. In some cases only one type is available -in which case when the problem starts use more reducer/thinner in the mix. Fast drying paints like most laquers are worst for this in my experience. Some of the epoxy primers out there today claim that no reduction is recessary, just mix 'part A' and 'part B' and shoot. In my experience I find that I almost always need to reduce these paints anyway. For the new water-reducible paints this is easy :) For the non-H20 types I have found that a little MEK usually does the job. Another basic thing that confused me in the beginning: Laquers use thinners. Enamels use reducers. Thinners usually are more volatile than reducers i.e. they dissolve more things and evaporate more quickly. Make sure what you are using is compatible with your paint. Usually if it 'curdles' the paint or otherwise doesn't seem to mix well then you've got the wrong stuff. Disclaimer: I've been doin' it awhile -but I ain't no expert. Scott N4ZW ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV4131rb(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 17, 1997
Subject: Weight and balance
(Michael C. Lott) writes: << I used the light weight alternator, regular starter, and lots of paint. I have about three different colors on the wings, one layer over the other. ( I tried schemes till I got to one i liked, and didn't strip previous layers) >> It sounds like your in the right ball park then. You may want to try some more accurate scales. Ryan --------------------- From: datastar.net!lottmc(at)matronics.com (Michael C. Lott) Date: 97-08-17 12:20:38 EDT I used the light weight alternator, regular starter, and lots of paint. I have about three different colors on the wings, one layer over the other. ( I tried schemes till I got to one i liked, and didn't strip previous layers) --+ | | | | | | --+ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 17, 1997
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)navix.net>
Subject: Re: Strobe Pack Location
>Can anyone suggest a good place to locate the strobe power pack? >The best two locations I have found are: >1. under the floor skins (is there enough room here)? >2. mounted on a shelf under the forward top fuse skin. >3. Obviously behine the baggage area would work, however I am trying to >keep stuff as forward (C.G.) in the airplane as possible. >I know the wire for the strobes is shielded. Is it still capable of >causing interference with instruments or radios? Does location affect >the potentional interference? >Glenn Gordon Glen, I mounted mine behind the baggage compartment. On my next six, it will go as far forward as possible, probably the firewall, mounted with nutplates. Anything you can do to get the C.G. forward if you are using a wood or fixed pitch metal prop is a good idea, I think. Some listers have mentioned routing wires along the front of the spar behind the tanks. I'd put a conduit behind the tank if I were going to do this. I think I read on the list long ago that it was OK to drill a hole in the inboard end of the spars for wire routing (similar to the location of the hole for the trim cable.) Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)navix.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 17, 1997
From: "Frank L Laczko Sr." <flaczko(at)ti.com>
Subject: Re: vision microsystems
Well, I did not measure it in an RV, but have seen 170+ in my car on the top of the dashboard in August. But then again, that WAS in Texas. I measured it after a portable CD player expired after being left there. Frank > > >> The display was ok at 150 degrees but when I tried 200 degrees it >> turned completely black. It did clear after about two or three >> minutes as it cooled. >> >> An LCD is susceptible to heat but I doubt our cockpits reach >> temperatures over 150 degrees. >> >> John Ammeter >> Seattle WA > >In Florida (where I live), I bet that they reach the 140/150 range. >Has anyone ever measured maximum cockpit temperature on a hot summer >day, preferably in Florida? TV news shows always quote "temperatures >in excess of 140 degrees" when talking about pets or children left in >cars on a hot day. > >So far, the conversation hasn't really convinced me that LCDs are OK >to use as instrument display devices. Their temperature extremes (hot >or cold) are rather likely to be reached. > >Earlier, I asked if anyone had encountered problems, and there hasn't >been much of a response. I guess now's the time to ask another >question. How many people are using LCD displays? What part of the >country do you live/fly in? > >'Rob > > > > > > +-- --+ > | Visit the Matronics & RV-List Web Sites at http://www.matronics.com | > | --- | > | To [un]subscribe from the RV-List, email "rv-list-request(at)matronics.com" | > | & put the word "[un]subscribe" in the *body*. No other text or subject. | > | --- | > | Please aggressivly edit quoted text on a followup posting! | > +-- --+ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 17, 1997
From: Denny Harjehausen <retflygtiger(at)proaxis.com>
Subject: Re: Touch Up Gun Problem
> >I use the small Sears touch up gun to spray Sherman Williams wash primer, >1:2 ratio, like Van uses. A lot of the time, when I first start >spraying, the gun sputters and I get a sort of textured finish (looks >awful - intense splatter pattern). Bill, I had that problem with the stinging at first, I discovered that I was stirring it enough or at least that seemed to cure that problem and the grainy texture I cured with more thinner. Anyway the above seemed to cure those problems. Have a good one! Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH Fuselage-top side Lebanon, OR ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 17, 1997
From: Denny Harjehausen <retflygtiger(at)proaxis.com>
Subject: Re: Cabin frame
>asked the same question (even provided drawings). Tom @ Vans says to rivet >through the skin, the triangular bit and the F-606. The Channel and the >angle are to be riveted together and then the angle is to riveted to the >F-606 WEB not the flange. The shim is just for size and can be left out once >you have drilled the angle to the F-606. (SNIP) Hi Royce, I wished I would have gotten a hold of Tom first. Ken @Van's sent me a message that is was to be riveted thru the mess and a couple of other guy's said they that way too. But, Tom's way sure would have save me a batch of time. (SNIP) >Is it my imagination or is the canopy "the hardest bit" (Van) and the front >area the poorest drawings? Everyone I know asks this question. (SNIP) Andy @ Van's said it wasn't drawn very clearly, so even one of the engineer types thinks that could be improved. (SNIP) >Anyone know what the joggle in the flange on the top of the F-606 is for? Is >it something to do with the slider?? (SNIP) No, I couldn't figure that out either.....I just flatten it out. Thanks for the thought...I finished that yesterday....Locating the seats today. Have a good one! Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH Fuselage-top side Lebanon, OR ________________________________________________________________________________
From: joehine(at)nbnet.nb.ca (joehine)
Subject: First Flights
Date: Aug 17, 1997
Listers, I've waited along time for this, and I am happy to tell you all that C-FYTQ had its first flight today in the capable hands of Eric Bradley who is a local long time RV owner. (flys TBM water Bombers, see an old RVator). The first flight was from Weyman Airpark which is owned by Eric father. The flight was uneventful except the radio quit and my brand new fuel pressure gauge had the needle fall off. There is one other problem that is not as easy to fix. The aircraft has a heavy right wing. This gets worse with airspeed, and at crusing speed requires moderate one hand pressure to correct. By the time we were slowed down ( this on subsiquent flights with me in the back) the heavyness was gone by the time the flaps were put down. I am not sure what steps to follow to chase this down and fix it. I didn't fly the airplane myself today because of this and nasty cross winds at Weymans one narrow runway. I remember reading here about squeezing the trailing edge of one aleron, but I couldn't remember if it was the heavy or light one. This put a little damper on an otherwise very good day. I have been eleven years and two months building this aircraft, and have looked forward to seeing fly for along time. The high signs from my neibours and smiles from my kids are very gratifying after all this time. Sorry to ramble. If anyone has ideas about the heavy wing please pass them along, I'm back out to the airport tomorrow to try and fix thingsand I don't have a test pilot anymore, he's back to his firebase and TBM's Joe C-FYTQ RV4 - flying!! first flight 97-08-17 joehine(at)nbnet.nb.ca 13 James St. 506-452-1072 Home Douglas, NB 506-452-3495 Work Canada, E3A 7Z2 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 17, 1997
From: Denny Harjehausen <retflygtiger(at)proaxis.com>
Subject: Re: Strobe Pack Location
> >I used the behind the baggage compartment. Based on my eyeball calculation, >worst case is you will be a pound less on your baggage maximum. In my case >(with C/S prop and 180HP, lite alt and starter), there are no limits on >baggage other than the 100 lb. limit. I'm pondering the location of the American ELT and the Whelan strobe. I have 160HP C/S with an light IFR panel. A fellow with an RV-6A told me he had to move his battery to the baggage for W&B purposes and advised me to start out that way. However other have said "No don't do it" Without having wt&bal form to play with the items. I thought I would put the ELT just aft the left seat and the the strobe pack on the other side behind the right seat. But,I wonder if shouldn't locate the one or both of them just aft baggage wall??? Have a good one! Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH Fuselage-top side Lebanon, OR ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kelli Lewis <mikel(at)dimensional.com>
Date: Aug 17, 1997
Subject: Re: Elevator tube
>Do you have the 5702-75-060 washers installed between >the bearing and the bracket that is welded on the bottom of the rear >stick. >ps These washers have 3/16 ID 5/16 OD and are 1/16" thick. > 5/16 OD? That is a pretty narrow washer........ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BigCfly001(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 17, 1997
Subject: elevator horn
dear listers, while fitting my right elevator to the HS I found I had a 1/8inch gap between the HS 411 assembly and the WD-405 elevator horn.I double checked all my measurements and they are right on.I understand a washer will go here but it will not close this gap.is this normal?should i use more than one washer?please help. chris marion rv-6 elevators cincy oh ________________________________________________________________________________
From: KBoatri144(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 17, 1997
Subject: Re: Touch Up Gun Problem
I've had the same problem with my touch up gun. After much frustration, I read the instructions and found that there is a cork gasket in the gun which needs to be oiled periodically to prevent an air leak (I use whatever oil is handy....air tool oil works fine). The gasket can be found by unscrewing the control knob on the back side of the gun and removing the needle. Given that priming (for me) is one of the more trying tasks , I go ahead and lube this gasket the night before I plan to prime just to eliminate one variable. Now, if I could just control bugs, dust, sun, rain, humidity, wind, and work schedule..... Kyle Boatright RV-6 Fuse ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 17, 1997
From: Bill Benedict <billb(at)europa.com>
Subject: Re: rv-4 vents
Michael, I just installed NACA type vents on my RV-4 fuselage, after using an older style on the canopy for the past 5 years. The vents on the canopy did not work unless you made a scoop on the outside to scoop the air in. The new ones on the fuselage are just below the cowl cheek extensions and just aft of the firewall. One on each side of the fuselage. The hose connects to the vents and runs up the sides, behind the panel then down the center just behind the firewall. The scoop on the left provides fresh air to the pilot via an SV-5 mounted just forward of the stick, next to the fuel selector valve. Works *great*, far better than the one on the canopy. The scoop on the right side also comes down beside the battery, through the spar and to the rear seat where the SV-5 is mounted adjacent to the pilots seat belt attachment, near the base of the passengers stick. It also works *great*. Both are highly recommended. The vent and hoses do not interfere with the pilots feet. Bill > >Does anyone know a good spot for some nasa type vents on an rv-4? I was >thinking of putting them righ below the canopy skirt on the right side >of the fuselage. That would be the easiest and flattest area, but I >wasn't sure if the low pressure from the wing would extend that far up, >or not. Does anyone here know, or does anyone know of a different type >vent with a built in adjustment that would fit on a curved surface that >I could install in the canopy skirt itself? Thanks for any advice. >Michael > Bill RV-4-180 soon. N894RV with over 400 hours behind a O-320, Over 1000 RV flying hours. These opinions are mine and do not necessarily represent the opinions or position of my employer. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 1997
From: "les williams" <lesliebwilliams(at)msn.com>
Subject: Touch Up Gun Problem
Add more thinner like about 2 to 1 ratio and it will come out fine! ---------- From: owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com on behalf of William H. Watson Sent: Sunday, August 17, 1997 8:31 AM Subject: RV-List: Touch Up Gun Problem Searched the archives, couldn't find any advice.... I use the small Sears touch up gun to spray Sherman Williams wash primer, 1:2 ratio, like Van uses. A lot of the time, when I first start spraying, the gun sputters and I get a sort of textured finish (looks awful - intense splatter pattern). Then I get something like cotton candy or spider webs forming from the spray. Fiddle, fiddle. After awhile, it seems to clear up, but I never feel like I'm in control of what's happening. Short of confining my flying to Arizona (no primer), what should I try/do? Bill Watson RV-6A Emp almost done ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 17, 1997
From: Craig Hiers <CRAIG-RV-4.@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: heat muff
Does anyone know how I can get in touch with Rick Robbins (sp). It's time to install carb and cockpit heat. I hope it's easier than the cowl and baffels! Craig Hiers RV-4 N143CH ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 1997
From: "les williams" <lesliebwilliams(at)msn.com>
Subject: elevator horn
Add more washers and/or spacers as necessary. ---------- From: owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com on behalf of aol.com!BigCfly001(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, August 17, 1997 4:57 PM Subject: RV-List: elevator horn dear listers, while fitting my right elevator to the HS I found I had a 1/8inch gap between the HS 411 assembly and the WD-405 elevator horn.I double checked all my measurements and they are right on.I understand a washer will go here but it will not close this gap.is this normal?should i use more than one washer?please help. chris marion rv-6 elevators cincy oh ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 1997
From: "les williams" <lesliebwilliams(at)msn.com>
Subject: Elevator tube
That's the idea so that it doesn't interfere with the rolling action of the bearing race cage. ---------- From: owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com on behalf of Kelli Lewis Sent: Sunday, August 17, 1997 4:27 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Elevator tube >Do you have the 5702-75-060 washers installed between >the bearing and the bracket that is welded on the bottom of the rear >stick. >ps These washers have 3/16 ID 5/16 OD and are 1/16" thick. > 5/16 OD? That is a pretty narrow washer........ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Bumflyer(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 17, 1997
Subject: Re: Strobe Pack Location
In a message dated 8/17/97 20:53:02, you wrote: >A fellow with an RV-6A told me he had to move his battery to the baggage for >W&B purposes and advised me to start out that way. However other have said >"No don't do it" Without having wt.&bal. form to play with the items. I >thought I would put the ELT just aft the left seat and the the strobe pack >on the other side behind the right seat. Denny, I don't think you would have any problem with this arrangement which is what I did; however perhaps we can hear from Geo. Orndorff, who has your exact configuration except for heavy IFR. He has told me he has no baggage limits. D Walsh RV-6A, now 47 hours ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 17, 1997
From: Thomas Velvick <rver(at)caljet.com>
Subject: Re: elevator horn
Chris, I have almost the same measurements on my elevator horn also (3/32). I don't see any other way to do it than to fill the space up with one or more washers. I know others in the past also had to trim the edge of the washer to make it fit flat due to the weldment around the horn. The plans show that the tube is not welded on one side to make room for the washer, but both of mine are welded all the way around. Regards, Tom Velvick Phoenix, AZ RV6a aligning elevators and rudder, waiting for wings > > dear listers, > while fitting my right elevator to the HS I found I had a 1/8inch gap >between the HS 411 assembly and the WD-405 elevator horn.I double checked all >my measurements and they are right on.I understand a washer will go here but >it will not close this gap.is this normal?should i use more than one >washer?please help. > >chris marion >rv-6 elevators >cincy oh ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Chris Hinch <chris(at)dcc.govt.nz>
Subject: Propellors - 3 blades vs 2
Date: Aug 18, 1997
In the latest RVator, Klaus Roth's RV-4 is shown on the inside cover. The caption says that the 3-blade csu prop is a composite - does anyone know what type it is, and whether it has Van's blessing? I've seen the archives and discussions, but how many RV's out there have three blade props? What is the advantages of three blades over two? Matt - how did your three blade turn out? Do any have the official stamp of approval? On an -8? 'Just Curious in New Zealand and Hopefully Not Asking Any "Dumb" Questions' aka Chris Hinch chris(at)dcc.govt.nz Future RV-8 builder PS - While the Maori name for NZ is Aoteroa, or "Land of the Long White Cloud", the visibility isn't always like that shown on the cover of the June 97 RVator! *grin* ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 17, 1997
From: Ernesto Sanchez <40106(at)utech.net>
Subject: 0-320
> >I have noticed several mid time lycoming 0-320 H2AD's for sale at > >much lower prices than the 0-320 A or E models. > >What is this H2AD model ?? Check out: http://www.prime-mover.org/Aviation/C172.ENGINES.html for a history of this motor. Ernesto Sanchez es12043(at)utech.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 17, 1997
From: Ernesto Sanchez <40106(at)utech.net>
Subject: Re: Touch Up Gun Problem
aol.com!KBoatri144(at)matronics.com wrote: > > > I've had the same problem with my touch up gun. After much frustration, I > read the instructions and found that there is a cork gasket in the gun which > needs to be oiled periodically to prevent an air leak (I use whatever oil is > handy.. Any chapped lips sticks are great on gaskets! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV4131rb(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 18, 1997
Subject: Re: heat muff
<< Does anyone know how I can get in touch with Rick Robbins (sp). >> 303-422-9389 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 1997
From: cfggg <ddebt(at)pathcom.com>
Subject: Re: First Flights
Squeeze the trailing edge on the aileron of the light wing ( RV-ator August 92). You might want to check the gear leg fairings if you are flying without wheel pants. David Fried > >There is one other problem that is not as easy to fix. The aircraft has a >heavy right wing. This gets worse with airspeed, and at crusing speed >requires moderate one hand pressure to correct. By the time we were slowed >down ( this on subsiquent flights with me in the back) the heavyness was >gone by the time the flaps were put down. > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 1997
From: Denny Harjehausen <retflygtiger(at)proaxis.com>
Subject: Re: First Flights
> >Listers, > >I've waited along time for this, > > and I am happy to tell you all that C-FYTQ had its first flight today in Good to hear it... Congradulations....gives me hope there may light at the end of the tunnel that isn't a train. According to the RVator you should "decreasing the trailing edge radius of the aileron on the LIGHT wing"....I guess should do it. Have a good one! Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH Fuselage-top side Lebanon, OR ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 1997
From: catbird(at)taylortel.com (TTC Carroll A. Bird)
Subject: Re: Elevator tube
Kelli Lewis wrote: > > > >ps These washers have 3/16 ID 5/16 OD and are 1/16" thick. > > > > 5/16 OD? That is a pretty narrow washer........ > That is what they measure, and they are narrow. They are to hold the rodend bearing off of the bracket that captures the bearing, this allows the bearing to deflect more from side to side. Carroll ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Bumflyer(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 18, 1997
Subject: Re: elevator horn
In a message dated 8/17/97 21:58:36, you wrote: >while fitting my right elevator to the HS I found I had a 1/8inch gap >between the HS 411 assembly and the WD-405 elevator horn.I double checked all >my measurements and they are right on.I understand a washer will go here but >it will not close this gap.is this normal?should i use more than one >washer?please help. yes, yes, and yes. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 18, 1997
Subject: Re: Elevator tube
<< 5/16 OD? That is a pretty narrow washer........ >> It's purpose is to function more as a spacer than a washer and allow greater torsional rotation than the individual rod end bearings would normally allow. -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: winterland(at)rkymtnhi.com
Date: Aug 18, 1997
Subject: Van's home Page address?
Can somebody please forward Van's home page address, or better yet, an e-mail address to which I can ask specific operational questions/ Thanks, Andy Gold ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MLaboyteau(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 18, 1997
Subject: Removeable Air Scoop
I'm currently fitting the air scoop to the cowling on my -6a, and I'm tempted to make it removeable by using camloc fasteners instead of bonding it to the cowl. I recall seeing a couple of articles where other builders have done this, but I've never heard any feed back concerning any negative effects from mounting it this way. The main reasons I want to make it removeable, are to make it easier to inspect the linkages on the fuel injector more often, and easier removal and installation of the bottom cowl piece. Does anyone on the list know of anyone else who has made their scoop removeable that I could get in touch with? Mark LaBoyteaux Mlaboyteau(at)aol.com RV-6A N106RV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: winterland(at)rkymtnhi.com
Date: Aug 18, 1997
Subject: Squealing brakes solution
A few days ago I posted a request for help trying to solve a problem with one side of my RV-6A brakes making a loud and high frequency vibration when ever applied. There were several suggestions from this list. The most logical place that you suggested to start was to switch the pads from side to side to see if the problem was with the pads themselves or with the remainder of the system.. Obviously, if the squeal switched to the right side, then the problems were with the pads, but if they stayed on the left side then the problem was elsewhere. Then a day or so later, a neighbor recommended a product called "disk brake quiet" which is available at most auto parts stores. Yesterday, at the airport I comitted the trouble shooter/mechanics biggest sin. In trying to solve the problem I did numerous fixes at once. The good news is that the problem is completely solved. The brakes are now quiet and working as they should. The bad news is that with three individual but simultaneous fixes, I am not sure which actually was the key item to solve the problem.. The three things I did were to: 1] swith the right and left calipers (inside and outside) from the right to the left side. 2] Apply the "disk brake quiet" to each side. 3] sprayed some graphite lubricant on the pins that ride within the slots of the brake set-up. I noticed that upon inspection that even after just 10 hours of operation that the surface of the pins were becoming somewhat marred, perhaps from a lack of lubrication. Because the problem completely dissappeared, I believe that just switching the pads over was not the solution. Therefore I give most of the credit to the "disk brake quiet". This stuff is a rubberized compound that comes in a 4-5 ounce container (about $4.00) that spreads like gasket silicone between the plunger and the inner calliper. Supposedly it is thick enough to dampen any vibrations that may be present in the system and eliminate the squeal which definitely was caused by a vibration of some sort. Either way, everything is fixed, and I can now proceed with the next item on my 2 pages of squaks. (how do you spell that?) I suppose thats why they call 'em Experimentals. Andy Gold RV-6A 5060 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6junkie(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 18, 1997
Subject: Re: Propellors - 3 blades vs 2
<< What is the advantages of three blades over two? >> I have a Performance 3-blade prop on my 6. It is pitched for cruise RPM (2650 @ 8000'). It is VERY smooth and quiet. I don't think that it accelerates or climbs as well as a two blade prop although it shows 2450 RPM's on takeoff (1200 to 1600 fpm depending on load and temp.) With 160 HP I get a top speed of 173 Kts and a best power cruise of 166 Kts TAS. This prop gives me what I was looking for, mostly a smooth and quiet prop. Based on what I have seen with the other RV's in my area, the Sensenich prop gives the best performance however, it is a metal prop so it does vibrate more than a wood prop. The three other RV-4's in my hangar all traded in their wood props (Pacesetter and Warnkie) for the Sensenich. They out run me by 2 to 5 Kts and really out climb me. I'm not sure if this is a function of the prop or that they are in 4's and I'm in a 6. One thing is for sure...I'm more comfortable. Gary Corde RV-6 N211GC - NJ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: kevin lane <n3773(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: swapped engine parts
Date: Aug 18, 1997
I had reached the point of taxi tests when nagging indiscepencies finally started falling in place. My 800 SN engine had the cylinders swapped, painted and a forgery placed in the log book to cover the mechanic while the engine had been in storage. The mags had been swapped, the oil filter removed as well as other parts. As a first time buyer I hadn't noticed this. My attention was on the log book which told only of a flawless childhood. Twenty four pounds compression in #3 caught my attention though. It will be very difficult to prove much. I'll be relying on the intregrity of the seller, who had trusted his mechanic, to compensate for the differences. Nine thousand is an expensive core. I've also learned that cylinders don't come in matched sets, even from the factory, and that the serial numbers on the case are designed to be easily removed(should they be used for another O/H). When pulling an engine, shops don't pull cylinders to preserve them, nor do engines smell of fresh paint ("just sprayed a bit of solvent on it to clean it up a bit, probably softened the paint some"). My situation is apparently not uncommon. Call a few cylinder rebuilders. Someone is probably wondering why his top end overhaul only lasted 1200 hours, "you never know with these engines, I've seen them go 3000 hours or just 1000 hours",( yeah, right, should of used single weight oil!). So N3773 is back to being a bunch of sheet metal and rivets and VERY tail heavy. Just discovered another pro for alternative engines, A&P's don't steal them. kevin ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 1997
From: Don McNamara <mcnamara(at)sbt.infi.net>
Subject: Wing Rib Alignment
For those who are getting ready to skin their wings, here's a tip that might help: You cleco your main wing skins on, look through the holes, only to find the little black line is not centered. You reach through, move the rib a little...but by the time you're ready to drill, one or more ribs have moved. Prior to clecoing on your skins, drill the hole through the spar and the rib flange while you can see the alignment. Then, when you cleco the skin in place, the cleco will hold the rib in place, and each rib will retain its general alignment. Any adjustment to find the centerline mark should be minimal. Unfortunately, I thought of this too late to do me much good, but maybe it'll help someone else. --Don McNamara RV-8 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 1997
From: Dennis Jackson <denny(at)transport.com>
Subject: Re: First Flights
joehine wrote: ...... > There is one other problem that is not as easy to fix. The aircraft has a > heavy right wing. This gets worse with airspeed, and at crusing speed > requires moderate one hand pressure to correct. ....... I had the same problem on my -4. Decrease the trailing edge radius on the light aileron and/or increase the radius on the heavy one. Believe it or not this can be done by laying a 2x4 or similar straight object against the trailing edge and carefully whacking it with a ball peen. Be gentle! Also Jerry VanGrunsven gave me a tip that might be relevant. He said to check the vertical alignment of the right and left ailerons to see if you might have one hinge bracket slightly off. This would change the aileron gap and it will make a big difference in the force the aileron exerts. If it is off a little you can elongate the bracket mounting holes to move it and then drill another hole for a locking bolt to prevent movement. Also check your ball for proper rudder trim. The rudder incidence will only be correct at one airspeed. Most RV's require a trim tab on the rudder to center the ball at cruising speed. If the ball is off center, the wing dihedral will contribute some rolling force. Good luck. DJ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 1997
From: "John C. Devlin" <jdevlin(at)americus.net>
Subject: Re: new rv fuel tank sealant
Dave, My sealant was sent to me from Van's in February so I assume it was the new stuff. There wasn't any indication of "Proseal" on the label. My tanks were sealed according to the Justice procedures in 80 degree ambient temperature. All surfaces to be sealed were roughed up with emery paper(med grit), washed with soap and water, and cleaned with MEK. It cured solid overnight. Work time was about 1 hour after mixing. I mixed by color with a charcoal grey the desired finished color. The material spread well by using 3/8 inch utility(acid) brushes with the bristles cut to 1/4 inch in length. A leak test, conducted 1 week after all assembly was completed and after a few rivets were shaved flush with the skin, showed no leaks. The material was stiff but pliable. Hope this helps, Best regards, John, RV6A, working on flaps; fuselage rcvd last week. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: winterland(at)rkymtnhi.com
Date: Aug 18, 1997
Subject: 0-360 operational limits
My next queries regard operational limits on the 0-360 engine. Basically, I would like to know what they are? I have asked these questions of several people, all of whom I admire as excellent and experienced pilots and mechanics. However each of them had different opinions and no one really knew what the "official" answers should be. I'm now wondering if there even are actual answers, or if the state of our collective knowledge is still guesses and "that seems to work for me" type responses. 1] What is meant by 2750 rpm red line. Is this an absolute never exceed because your engine will blow up within 5 minutes type number? Although I've heard lots of people who claim to routinely operate above this so-called limit. Next; Is it bad for the engine to run near this speed. In other words is 2600-2700 rpm quickly wearing out the engine or drastically lowering the expected TBO. Or is it best for the engine to run down in the 2200 - 2400 range? I fly from a high altitude airport (8200') and must immediately climb to at least 10,-11,000' after take off (or, 13,000 - 14,000' if I want to go anywhere) Therefore manifold pressure is always low. I rarely see much more than 18-19". Increasing throttle does little but increase rpm. So 2500 rpm + 18" = about 60% power. I can add power and get the rpm up to 2700-2800 which brings me up to about 70%. But I'm wondering if this is bad for the engine even though manifold pressures are down. I've heard people say that engines which operate at low manifold pressures due to high density altitudes seem to last longer because of less internal stress? Any opinions (or facts) about that? 2] Next, what are proper Oil temp and Oil pressure figures? What is best for the engine and at what point should these values become a concern? 3] Same for EGT and CHT? What is considered a safe range and where should I become concerned? How about the extent of differential reading for different cylinders? 4] Finally, what are the proper procedures for leaning the engine. If by the EGT guage, how long does it take the gauge to respond to mixture adjustments. and therefore should I slowly pull the mixture one click at a time over a 5-10 minute period and set the mixture in that way. Or is the correct procedure to pull the mixture until the engine begins to stumple and then push it back in a "few" clicks. By the way this is a procedure which I am not real comfortable with; pulling the mixture until the engine "almost quits". Do I need to just "get comfortable with it" or is there a better way? Thanks, I appreciate your answers or at least a refferral of whom else I can ask. Andy Gold RV-6A N-5060 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BigCfly001(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 18, 1997
Subject: taildragger fly-in
dear listers' on saturday,august 30&31 waynesville airport/EAA 284 will be hosting their annual taildragger fly-in.this year spend an evening with Duan Cole,"the dean of aerobatics" in a free program 7pm sat.fly-in breakfast 7am sun.he will be book signing all day sun.there will be a fly market,judging best homebuilt,classic,antique and contemporary aircraft. I've attended this fly-in for several years and there are always alot of nice aircraft,including RV's.this is where i first fell in love with the RV.if anyones interested in attending and need more info e-mail me off the list. chris marion RV-6 finishing r-elevator cincy oh BigCfly001(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ShelbyRV6A(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 18, 1997
Subject: Re: Propellors - 3 blades vs 2
In a message dated 8/18/97 5:29:06 PM, you wrote: <> While at Oshkosh, one of the most intriguing products I found was the new prop being developed in Starkeville, MS in conjunction with NASA. My understaniding is that it flexes(Composite) thus working better than a metal prop that does not flex. It reportedly is 16 decibels quieter than a Sensenich prop and much smoother. It is somewhat S shaped. Downside. $3500 for 160 hp version. Shelby in Nashville. RV6a - ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ShelbyRV6A(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 18, 1997
Subject: RV-6+ 4 place
Since there doesn't or hasn't been much discussion of this, I thought now might be a good time to start a thread. It is an interesting plane. They seemed to have done a pretty good job of thinking through most of the issues. The canopy will need some improvement(I think in the works). I still favor a trike. I also am not sure how passengers respond to flying backwards.(A VW dealer told me once that the Vanagons with rear facing seats made passengers sick). I am also not to excited about burning 14-15 gallons an hour. By the way Ken Scott was ask on short notice to announce during the RV fly-over. Considering this was his first time to speak to 100K plus people, he did a good job. The lead announcer asked what Van thought of the 4 place RV-6 - Ken didn't miss a beat as he changed the subject. I also think Van's time would have been better spent on a project such as this rather than a beefed up RV-4 as in the RV-8. An RV-8 will never be as attractive as a Harmon Rocket of which there were several very nice examples at Oshkosh. My apologies to the 8 builders, but I think too much of Van's resources are being devoted to that plane. Shelby in Nashvillle. RV6A ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 1997
From: Denny Harjehausen <retflygtiger(at)proaxis.com>
Subject: Re: Van's home Page address?
> >Can somebody please forward Van's home page address, or >better yet, an e-mail address to which I can ask specific >operational questions/ > Andy, try support(at)vansaircraft.com Have a good one! Denny, RV-6 (R)N641DH Fuselage-top side Lebanon, OR ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 19, 1997
From: "les williams" <lesliebwilliams(at)msn.com>
Subject: HS Forward Spar
You can add some extra rivets with the proper edge distance between the too close ones. ---------- From: owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com on behalf of David Wheaton Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 1997 6:06 AM Subject: RV-List: HS Forward Spar After I built up the front spar in the HS, I noticed that three of the four rivet holes through the HS 610 (smaller aluminum angle) on each of the spar tongues do not have the proper 2D edge distance (1/4"). The worst case edge distance is 1/16" shy of the 2D required. I cut only enough of the flange of the spar to get rid of the bend and then centered the 614 and 610 on the spar with the proper 3 and 1/4" spacing. I also made sure that the 614 and 610 did not protrude above the spar flanges. Anyway, that's how I did it and now I don't have the proper edge distance on the 610. Has anyone done this? And what did you do about it. Redo? Dave Wheaton rv6 Rosamond, CA ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 1997
From: Dr John Cocker <jcocker(at)medhumor.com>
Subject: Re: First Flights
Congratulations, its a great feeling. My aircraft also had a heavy R wing, and I squeezed the trailing edge of the L aileron which was an instant cure. I could not believe how a gentle squeeze could make such a big diference. I also had the radio quit during the first flight, mine just slid a little out of its tray. I now have 70 hours on C GDOC, including trips to New York (Tetaboro) and Winnipeg, and the flying characteristics are just as fabulous as everyone says. John ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 1997
From: Mike Weller <myaccount(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Which O-360?
>Hi Guys > >My mechanic has talked me into using an O-360 on my RV-8. I plan to buy a >core and overhaul it with new cylinders and use a constant speed prop. Does >anyone have an opinion on which dash number(s) of O-360 would work best? > >Thanks > >Rob Miller >Fuse on the way > Rob and all, I plan to use either an IO- or O-360. My only experience is with the -A1A versions. That is my choice right now. The only problem that I had was with sticking exhaust valves. Marvel Mystery oil was a solution, but that's a whole other thread. The summer heat here in Alabama has put a stop to building my RV-8 emp. I look forward to going full speed ahead with my project after a short vacation in a couple of weeks. It will be really neat to show something to my friends that at least looks like part of an airplane. Nobody but a builder (and my wife) would appreciate the amount of work that I've done to get to this point I look forward to hearing about your work and choices that you make. Mike Weller RV-8 (under construction) midibu(at)hsv.mindspring.com (preferred) or mike.weller(at)msfc.nasa.gov ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6Russ(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 18, 1997
Subject: Re: First Flights
Joe I don't remember any adjustment to the trailing edgeof the aileron that will fix a wing heavy condition. I also would not broadcast that the plane was flying with two people in it during the restriction fly off time. I'm sure this wasn't the case and was just a misprint. Enjoy your plane and have a great day. Russ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 1997
From: lottmc(at)datastar.net (Michael C. Lott)
Subject: Re: rv-4 vents
Thanks, Bill That is where I already put the one for the front seat. I still have to figure out about the hole through the spar for the rear seat vent. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 1997
From: lottmc(at)datastar.net (Michael C. Lott)
Subject: faa inspection
Does the plane need to be signed off by an a/p before the faa inspects it or, just after the inspection and before the first flight? Also, I would like to check the airspeed indicator. I have the lines sealed so it doesn't leak down but I need to know how many inches of water in the tube equals how many mph on the indicator. Also, I was wondering about safety wire and lock nuts. All the controls have lock nuts on the bolts, none has safety wire. And, what about the prop bolts? These have no provision for safety wires. Are the lock nuts okay without safety wire? One last thing. Does a composite prop wear in rain like a wood prop? Thanks, Michael.. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 1997
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)navix.net>
Subject: Re: 0-360 operational limits
Andy, One interesting web page on engines is: http://www.prime-mover.org/Engines/ I don't know if it will answer any of your questions but it's an interesting and informative site. I'd give Lycoming a call for the info you seek. They should be able to answer all of your questions. I think it's generally accepted that an engine can run all day at a redline of 2,700 over 8,000 feet. At 8,000 or over, the engine can't develop over 75% power (normally aspirated). Of course, lower rpms should lessen wear. I would think that a constant speed would be of real value to you considering your airport elevation. I sure wish I had a C.S. on my six. My next one will. Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)navix.net >My next queries regard operational limits on the 0-360 engine. >1] What is meant by 2750 rpm red line. Is this an absolute >Andy Gold >RV-6A N-5060 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Daniel H. Morris III" <Morristec(at)icdc.com>
Subject: Re: 0-360 operational limits
Date: Aug 18, 1997
You said-- > My next queries regard operational limits on the 0-360 engine. > Basically, I would like to know what they are? I have asked > > Andy Gold > RV-6A N-5060 Dear Andy, Lycoming sells an operating handbook with just this info for only $13.00. Amazingly cheap. Contact your local Lyc. shop or Lyc directly. Dan Morris ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Daniel H. Morris III" <Morristec(at)icdc.com>
Subject: Re: Propellors - 3 blades vs 2
Date: Aug 18, 1997
> > While at Oshkosh, one of the most intriguing products I found was the new > prop being developed in Starkeville, MS in conjunction with NASA. My > understaniding is that it flexes(Composite) thus working better than a metal > prop that does not flex. It reportedly is 16 decibels quieter than a > Sensenich prop and much smoother. It is somewhat S shaped. > > Downside. $3500 for 160 hp version. > > Shelby in Nashville. > RV6a - > This is a very interesting prop with a Scimitar planform. I spoke at length with the company (a friend works there) and they are intending to offer one for the RV-6/ 6A first before the certificated prop. The only question is weather they will optomize the prop for the -6 or just use the one that they developed for their airplane. The only problem is that it's design speed range is about 20 mph slower than the RV-6 so it may not be as efficient at high speeds. This prop is truely unique with a constantly changing pitch and airfoil section from root to tip. It could give Sensenich and Hartzel a run. BTW it is supposed to be MORE efficient than a constant speed prop, and is only 19 lbs. complete. Dan Morris Only the canopy left. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 1997
From: Ernesto Sanchez <40106(at)utech.net>
Subject: Re: RV-6+ 4 place
aol.com!ShelbyRV6A(at)matronics.com wrote: > An RV-8 will never be as > attractive as a Harmon Rocket of which there were several very nice examples at Oshkosh. Are Harmon rockets modified RV's?? Ernesto Sanchez es12043(at)utech.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: klaus.roth(at)med.siemens.de
Importance: normal
Subject: Propellors - 3 blades vs 2
Date: Aug 19, 1997
charset = ISO-8859-1; Type = Text; x-dmw-oid = 2A864886F70F0301; x-dmw-btname = "PlainText" Hello Chris, I choosed the prop due to our strict regulation of noise emission here in Germany. I wanted to have a constant speed prop and I know that a composite prop is quieter than a metal prop. I can compare with a two blade Hartzell on a Husky A1. (With a constant speed prop I can control the rpm and with this the noise ) I hope to achieve a noise level of 66.8 dB(A) with my prop (at 24 inch manifold/2200rpm) and two exhaust mufflers. The prop comes from "mt-propeller" (Muehlbauer) here in Germany and I am very satisfied with it. I have a Lycoming O-360-A1A and I get a climbrate of 2400 ft/min with this combination. Just a few days ago I achieved a flight level of 24 000 ft and I could climb further. (I had 200 ft/min in this flight level) Best regards Klaus Roth Germany RV-4, D-ERKR ---------- Von: "owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com"@LOCAL An: "rv-list "@LOCAL Betreff: RV-List: Propellors - 3 blades vs 2 Datum: Montag, 18. August 1997 06:46 <> In the latest RVator, Klaus Roth's RV-4 is shown on the inside cover. The caption says that the 3-blade csu prop is a composite - does anyone know what type it is, and whether it has Van's blessing? I've seen the archives and discussions, but how many RV's out there have three blade props? What is the advantages of three blades over two? Matt - how did your three blade turn out? Do any have the official stamp of approval? On an -8? 'Just Curious in New Zealand and Hopefully Not Asking Any "Dumb" Questions' aka Chris Hinch chris(at)dcc.govt.nz Future RV-8 builder PS - While the Maori name for NZ is Aoteroa, or "Land of the Long White ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 1997
From: Bill Benedict <billb(at)europa.com>
Subject: Re: trim/throttle cables
Alan, Another person answered, but typically you need to run a file over the little ball to elongate the hole it is in to get it to drop out. So the process is: Push the knob all the way in. Remove the green cable from the vernier section by unscrewing the nut where the green cable attaches to the vernier. Disconnect the center of the cable from the vernier section with a 90 degree rotation. Unscrew the vernier knob or press on the center of the knob and pull the center section out. The ball will be visible on the shaft. Sometimes it falls out and is immediately lost, but only if you want to retain the vernier function. If you want to disable the vernier, the ball will not fall out. Usually you can get the ball out by depressing the center of the knob and taking the edge of a file and running it over the hole the ball resides in. When the ball finally pops out, reassemble the cable without the ball. It now makes a very nice friction lock cable. Bill > >Does anyone know how to remove the ball from the Van's vernier >trim/throttle cable to make it operate smoother?? > >Alan Chappelow >Empennage complete in 134 hours >Waiting for wing kit next week >Question is for another RV-6 owner > Bill RV-4-180 soon. N894RV with over 400 hours behind a O-320, Over 1000 RV flying hours. These opinions are mine and do not necessarily represent the opinions or position of my employer. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 1997
From: Bill Benedict <billb(at)europa.com>
Subject: Re: Van's home Page address?
Vans can be reached at several addresses. Some of them are listed on the back of the Accessories catalog. As someone else mentioned, will work, or using a few less keys, you can reach us at . Take your pick, but they all show up at the europa address. Bill > >Can somebody please forward Van's home page address, or >better yet, an e-mail address to which I can ask specific >operational questions/ > >Thanks, >Andy Gold Bill RV-4-180 soon. N894RV with over 400 hours behind a O-320, Over 1000 RV flying hours. These opinions are mine and do not necessarily represent the opinions or position of my employer. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 1997
From: Gil Alexander <gila(at)flash.net>
Subject: Sensenich prop and more HP
RV-listers, I am considering having one of the "more HP" shops 'improve' my Lyc. O-320 when it is being rebuilt (basically flowed heads and more compression) and asked Sensenich if this would affect the 2600 rpm limit on their metal prop. I thought others might be interested in the reply - which is published with permission. Remember that the certification for reduced fly-off time is for an engine/prop combination, and my mods. will definitely fall outside this 'certified' definition. thanks .... Gil (more HP at 2600) Alexander RV6A, #20701, N64GA (rsvd.) finish kit PS I was impressed with the response from Sensenich - the delay refered to below was only two days. PPS I also bought the Sensenich RV6 metal spinner six months ago. A nicely constructed unit that is already aligned, prop clearance cut, holes drilled and has nutplates already mounted. Much better that the sloppy holes that seem to be somewhat prevalent in the factory glass spinners after some time in service. *************************************************************** From: Buddy Sessoms Subject: Sensenich Prop I am sorry that the reply took so long, but you can use our 70CM prop on your modified engine. We cannot give you any "official" go ahead since this is a certified prop. We can tell you that our computer models do not show any problems. The vibrations for this rotating system are known as a function of RPM. Obviously HP and thus manifold pressure have an effect, but we feel that small HP changes play a minor part in vibratory stresses for this installation. Good luck on you project and I hope to see you at one of the fly-ins. Buddy Aeronautical Engineer Sensenich Propeller Manufacturing *************************************************************** ------------------------------------ RV6A, #20701, finishing kit "REPLY" sends to entire RV-list mailto:gila(at)flash.net to reply privately ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 1997
From: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: First Flights
aol.com!RV6Russ(at)matronics.com wrote: > > > Joe I don't remember any adjustment to the trailing edgeof the aileron > that will fix a wing heavy condition. Lightly squeezing the trailing edge of the aileron opposite of the heavy wing will fix the heavy wing situation. I would check out all other options first though such as flaps are both set the same, one or two degrees difference will make a difference in the way it flies. Just remember not to squeeze very much it takes very little to make a difference. > I also would not broadcast that the plane was flying with two people > in it during the restriction fly off time. I'm sure this wasn't the > case and was just a misprint. This topic seems to keep poping up and I used to be against taking two people on the first flight and still am from a standpoint of if there is a problem why risk two people. BUT the operating limitations say not to take two people unless they are necessary for the *FLIGHT*, it does not say unless two people are necessary to *OPERATE THE AIRPLANE*. Despite what some FAA people will tell you it is OK to take two people if you feel it is necessary for a safe flight. Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS First flight July 14, 1989 :-) Hillsboro, OR jsflyrv(at)ix.netcom.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stephen J. Soule" <SSoule(at)pfclaw.com>
Subject: RV-6+ 4 place
Date: Aug 19, 1997
charset="iso-8859-1" Hi Shelby, I think that I would have bought the RV-8 instead of the RV-6A if the RV-8 had been available. I like the design. Steve Huntington, Vermont <<>> ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 19, 1997
From: halk(at)sybase.com (Hal Kempthorne)
Subject: Re: 0-360 operational limits
Hi Andy and all, > > 1] What is meant by 2750 rpm red line. Is this an absolute > never exceed because your engine will blow up within 5 minutes > type number? Although I've heard lots of people who claim to > routinely operate above this so-called limit. > Next; Is it bad for the engine to run near this speed. In other > words is 2600-2700 rpm quickly wearing out the engine or > drastically lowering the expected TBO. Or is it best for the > engine to run down in the 2200 - 2400 range? The red line is a point which the designer of the engine has not designed his engine to go beyond. I would not go beyond it for two reasons: 1 - It is naughty. 2 - Horsepower output will decline. At least that is usually the case - maximum horsepower is produced at a speed at or below the red line. Oh, I should caution you that I am not a Lycoming expert :-) There is more stress on the engine components as RPM increases. Operate within recommended parameters. More stress from operating at 2600 RPM versus 2300 RPM is probably ok just as pressing on a stone wall with your thumb does not do the wall any more harm than pressing with your little finger as both are below the limit for the stone wall. Don't you get better fuel economy at a lower setting? Oh, I see, you are always up high. > I fly from a high altitude airport (8200') and must immediately > climb to at least 10,-11,000' after take off (or, 13,000 - > 14,000' if I want to go anywhere) Therefore manifold pressure > is always low. I rarely see much more than 18-19". Increasing > throttle does little but increase rpm. So 2500 rpm + 18" = > about 60% power. I can add power and get the rpm up to > 2700-2800 which brings me up to about 70%. But I'm > wondering if this is bad for the engine even though manifold > pressures are down. I've heard people say that engines which > operate at low manifold pressures due to high density altitudes > seem to last longer because of less internal stress? Any > opinions (or facts) about that? Pressures and stresses are much less at high altitude but still I'd stay below the red line. I spend a lot of my flying over high country. My RV-6A will most likely have a Chevy V6 of about 240 HP. I won't use that down low as I don't know what effect it will have on the airframe. Where I want to use the power is up high. At 8000 ft I will be able to firewall it and have 75% of 240 or about 180HP! If I had a 160HP Lycoming, it would be down to 120HP. Manifold pressure will be low - but the "LAN" will make up for it. I refer to the formula for HP = PLANk where P is pressure, A the area on top of the pistons, L the length of the stroke, N is the RPM and k is a constant. If P drops the HP drops. My Debonair has a set of performance tables. One way to get the mixture right is to use the tables. Hal Kempthorne RV-6AQ -- On main gear - panel stuff halk(at)sybase.com Santa Clara, CA. Debonair N6134V @ SJC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: jbalbierer(at)nysyr.ang.af.mil
Date: Aug 19, 1997
Subject: 5 Point Harness For Sale
charset=US-ASCII To anyone interested: I have two Brand New 5 point safety harness sets for sale(never used). 3" lap belt and 2" shoulder harness. They are new from WAG Aero normally $160 per set that I will sell for $250 for both sets. I will also provide a drawing that I used for a 5th point attachment(crotch strap) on my RV-6. Please call or e-mail me directly: John Balbierer (315) 622-3846 jbalbierer(at)nysyr.ang.af.mil ________________________________________________________________________________
From: rimbold(at)apollo.hp.com
Date: Aug 19, 1997
(datastar.net!lottmc(at)matronics.com)
Subject: Re: faa inspection
> Also, I would like to check the airspeed indicator. I have the > lines sealed so it doesn't leak down but I need to know how many > inches of water in the tube equals how many mph on the indicator. The formula to use is: airspeed in mph = square root of (inches of water times 1980.0) This formula was derived from a set of data gathered empirically. The formula is optimized (i.e. most accurate) at 100mph. At 100mph, the data shows a speed of 100 knots (not mph) equals 6.56 pressure inches of water. The formula will produce an error of around +2 mph at 150 mph, and -1.5 mph at 70 mph. I got this information from an old Kitplanes article written by Jim Weir. He's got it posted (sadly, as a TIFF image - I can't easily forward it to this list) on his website http://www.rst.com The actual data measurements, if you want real accuracy, are printed in the article. He gives a tip for easier reading of the water level - add a drop of soap to reduce the meniscus. 'Rob ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 1997
Subject: Re: Strobe Pack Location
From: ebundy(at)juno.com (Ed Bundy)
>I'm pondering the location of the American ELT and the Whelan strobe. I have 160HP C/S with an light IFR panel. A fellow with an RV-6A told me he had to move his battery to the baggage for W&B purposes and advised me to start out that way. However other have said "No don't do it" Without having wt&bal form to play with the items. I thought I would put the ELT just aft the left seat and the the strobe pack on the other side behind the right seat.< Denny, with your situation I can't see that you will have a CG problem. I have a 6A with a 160/metal FP installation and my empty CG is just a hair behind the front limit. I can't even load to the aft CG without going WAY over the baggage weight limit. In short, I can NOT load my airplane outside of either limit. I certainly wouldn't put my battery in the baggage compartment before I weighed the aircraft. BTW, I did exactly what you suggest; the ELT and strobe pack are located behind the seats. Works out very well, and is easy to install. Ed Bundy RV6A - first flight 11/20/96 ebundy(at)juno.com - Eagle, ID ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Tedd McHenry <tedd(at)idacom.hp.com>
Subject: Re: Squealing brakes solution
Date: Aug 19, 1997
Andy: > The three things I did were to: > 1] swith the right and left calipers (inside and outside) from the > right to the left side. > > 2] Apply the "disk brake quiet" to each side. > > 3] sprayed some graphite lubricant on the pins that ride within > the slots of the brake set-up. I noticed that upon inspection > that even after just 10 hours of operation that the surface of > the pins were becoming somewhat marred, perhaps from a lack > of lubrication. I think you're right that the "disk brake quiet" product is mostly responsible for the cure. The squealing is a harmonic, and the rubbery compound changes the natural frequency of the assembly, and dampens it. Switching pads isn't really a very good idea. The pads "bed in" to the profile of the rotor, and shouldn't be switched after that. (The rotors aren't be perfectly shaped.) Could cause the brakes to be "grabby." On a car with disk brakes, it seems to help to use the brakes hard once in a while. I've cured brake squeal in cars this way lots of times. You want to be careful doing that on an airplane, though. Tedd McHenry Surrey, BC tedd(at)idacom.hp.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 19, 1997
From: halk(at)sybase.com (Hal Kempthorne)
Subject: Re: swapped engine parts
Kevin Lane wrote a sad story about buying a "good" 800 SNEW Lycoming that turned out to have some of its parts substituted with worn out ones and logbooks forged. When things get very expensive, crooks appear and these things happen. I heard of another case where a builder bought a Lycoming core, with no warranties, for rebuilding. On teardown it was found to have an unusable crankshaft, a very expensive part. I don't think I'd buy a core without a guarantee of the usability of crank and case. At least we don't have to worry much about bogus parts. I read somewhere that the airlines, whose parts cost ten times what ours do, is a preferred market. Hal Kempthorne RV-6AQ -- On main gear - panel stuff halk(at)sybase.com Santa Clara, CA. Debonair N6134V @ SJC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 19, 1997
From: Bob Skinner <BSkinner(at)navix.net>
Subject: Oil temp sender
Does anyone on the list have a Rochester, electric oil temp. sender sitting on the bench that they won't need for a few weeks and, if so, would you be willing to loan it to me for a couple of weeks (travel time included). I have a fluctuating (?) needle and it seems like switching senders would be an easy way to trouble shoot the problem. If you have one and would be willing to lend it to me, contact me off-list, please. Thanks, Bob Skinner RV-6 BSkinner(at)navix.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 19, 1997
From: Mike Weller <myaccount(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: RV-6+ 4 place
> >Since there doesn't or hasn't been much discussion of this, I thought now >might be a good time to start a thread. > Sounds good so far. >I also think Van's time would have been better spent on a project such as >this rather than a beefed up RV-4 as in the RV-8. An RV-8 will never be as >attractive as a Harmon Rocket of which there were several very nice examples


August 07, 1997 - August 19, 1997

RV-Archive.digest.vol-df