RV-Archive.digest.vol-ds

November 19, 1997 - December 03, 1997



      willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil 
      
      >
      >There is a possible fix for potential danger from the wet wing fuel cells
      >just
      >over the horizon.  There is a project right now under way to market a V-4
      >TurboDiesel(200HP) .  This engine runs on Jet-A, which is alot less volatile
      >than Avgas or autofuel.
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 1997
Subject: Re: Oh, the choices
From: bob.char.reeves(at)juno.com (Robert L Reeves)
Have you checked out the -8? More baggage room (in the front), more people room, upgraded for the larger engine, and cleaner lines (IMHO). It may well be my next one! Bob Reeves Building Bearhawk, Flying RV-4 Hidden River Airport, Sarasota, Florida ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 19, 1997
Subject: Re: Autopilot
<< If there is anyone who has installed a navaid (or other) autopilot on a -4, could you please describe the installation? Mine has footwells for rear passenger, which might limit the space for the servo. Pat Allender, Iowa City RV 4 Pat A(at)aol.com >> Pat: We have installed the Navaid servo on a customer's Rocket, and we put the srevo exactly where the footwells would have been. A conversation with another Rocketman led to an alternate location: forward of the spar, under the left side fwd floor pc. (Attach the actuator arm to the front of the torque tube) This area is somewhat larger on the Rocket, compared to the -4. I'm waiting on delivery of the servo for our current project, so I can't give you dimensions to do a mock-up. I understand you could also put it in the wing, near the ail bellcrank. Check six! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gretz, Warren" <GretzW(at)tcplink.nrel.gov>
Subject: Static Port/Pitot Tube
Date: Nov 20, 1997
If you use one of my installation kits of pitot tube mounting bracket and one of the heated pitot tubes I also sell, which is the AN5814 with static source built into the tube, you do not need to install any additional static ports in the rear of the fuselage. Someone recently asked me if it would be best to use a pitot tube with static source and also install the static port in the rear fuselage, just for the accuracy it may make. My answer to the question was, it is not necessary and also will just make additional places for the static system to develop leaks which would be bad for accuracy. The heated pitot tubes with static sources in them are all accurate. It is the location of the pitot tube that makes them non-accurate. My recommended placement of the AN5814 pitot tube, which is in my complete instructions, will make for an accurate system. The entrance to the dynamic source of the pitot tube, in my installation kit, is nearly the same location as that of the known accurate placement of Vans bent aluminum tube pitot. Vans placement of his pitot tube is a compromise location that works very well. The only truly accurate location is at least 3-4 feet in front of any surface that is passing through totally undisturbed air. That is why you will see the long stinger pitot tubes with static ports in them on the aircraft that are undergoing very critical and accurate flight testing. You may contact me for a flyer on my installation kits and pitot tubes at the address below. Gretz Aero Warren Gretz 3664 E. Lake Drive Littleton, CO 80121 (303) 770-3811 gretzw(at)tcplink.nrel.gov ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rvmils(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 20, 1997
Subject: 1/2 point
I just finish my ailerons and flaps. Both wings have been bottom skined, the fuel tanks and leading edges are complete. I started in May 97 and I'm trying to find out how long I have left. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rvmils(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 20, 1997
Subject: Re: Allison throttle body.
Let me kn ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rvmils(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 20, 1997
Subject: Re: Allison throttle body.
L ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rvmils(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 20, 1997
Subject: Re: Allison throttle body.
Let me know how I can reach this guy. Blue Skies Carey Mills ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jones, Bryan D. (LPT)" <JonesB(at)geon.com>
Subject: Bolt hole clearance El Horn
Date: Nov 20, 1997
Counterfeit bolts are a real problem. As are counterfeit piping fittings, pipe, aircraft components, etc... Check your sources - cheap is a pretty good indicator of a fake. Insist on material certification showing origin of material and manufacturer. Good thing we have all of these wonderful trade policies with China and countries south of the border (since these are generally the folks who like to make and sell counterfeit goods)! Bryan Jones JONESB(at)GEON.COM > > Be careful with assuming all socket head cap screws are Grade 8,last > company I was with had a purchasing agent that found a great buy on > SHCS's > from out east somewhere,China? We soon found out why they were cheap > as the > heads parted company at less torque than a Grade 5 would > take.Incidentally > they looked great with a Cad.finish[that may be the way to recognise > them > visually]. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GBaker24(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 20, 1997
Subject: Re: Oh, the choices
Paul, Re your decision on the -4 or the -6A, I am building a -6 and have ridden many times with a friend in his -4. I love the airplane but decided against building the -4 because after the initial joy of riding in an RV wore off, I found myself occasionally getting bored looking at my friend's head and shoulders. I knew that if I didn't fully enjoy the ride back there, I would not get my wife or two sons to go on many rides with me. So I decided on the -6. If I knew that I would only be going by myself the majority of flights, I would definitely have chosen the -4. What a sleek design! Good luck with your decision. See if you can arrange a ride in a -4 for your wife and ask for her opinion. You'll probably find that you will need her support many times during the construction period and it will help if she has some feel for the end result. Gary Baker RV-6 (starting on wing spar) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dralle(at)roxanne.llnl.gov (Matt G. Dralle 510-422-4896)
Date: Nov 20, 1997
Subject: Re: List Status! Please Read...
>-------------- > > >Listers, > >As promised, Matronics is upgrading their Internet connectivitiy this week. >As you might have noticed, there havn't been any List messages for a couple of >days. Processing of List traffic has been disabled until I am confident that >everything is stable and all MX and domain records have been updated >correctly. As you might have guessed, this is not the case just yet and I hope >to have things back online by the weekend. > >Please *do not* post any messages to the List until I announce that >connectivity has been completely restored. Any messages that have been >posted in the last couple of days have been queued and I will forward them >when things are working correctly. > >Thanks! > >Matt Dralle >RV-List Admin. >Matronics > > >-- > >Matt G. Dralle | Matronics | P.O. Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 >510-606-1001 Voice | 510-606-6281 FAX | dralle(at)matronics.com Email >http://www.matronics.com/ W.W.W. | Featuring Products For Aircraft > > > > >-------------- -- Matt G. Dralle Internet LAN/WAN Communications Specialist Open LabNet | Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7000 East Ave | PO Box 808 | L-267 | Livermore | California | 94550 510-422-4896 - Voice | 510-422-2425 - FAX | dralle(at)llnl.gov - Email ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WBWard(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 20, 1997
Subject: Safety
Guys, and gals, where applicable Someone recently posted an inquiry about what he should do about a few *extra holes* he had drilled in his rib flanges. Some of the answers I read in subsequent postings, sounded downright cavalier to me, and could leave the impression that its *OK* to have a few *exyra holes* in your stringers, ribs, and bulkheads. Depending on *where* those extra holes are drilled, and the structural requirement of the component, this can be relatively serious, in a dangerous sort of way. Anytime *extra* material is removed from a structural component, whether by drilling or other mechanical processes such as filing, ETC., the strength of the component is degraded in proportion to the amount of material removed. I am presently working on an RV-4 kit, in which *someone* drilled a *few* holes in the wrong places, along with a few *extra* holes. Basically, I am having to *re-build* this aircraft, to a condition that will meet my requirements, and those I consider reasonable to maintain structural integrity. (I have reasonably high, but not impossible standards.) It isnt so much where or how one drills an extra hole that matters, but what one does to evaluate the error, and effect a repair which will maintain or improve the structural integrity of the component. My advice-such as it is, would have been to fabricate a small doubler for the flange, of the same thickness and type of material, that would be of sufficient length to pick up, at a minimum, at least one fastener, either side of the location of the incorrectly drilled hole. Then re-drill the hole in the correct orientation, and when you fasten everything together at final assembly, you have a reasonably sound repair in place. Having accomplished this, then, you shouldnt have to worry too much about 1 or 2 misplaced or double drilled holes. The airplane that I have, per the evaluation that I have done-so far, would have been a structurally deadly piece of machinery, had it ever made it to completion in the condition that was prevalent at the time I purchased it. (Some people should never have tools in their hands. What can I say?) I would seriously hope, that this aircraft would have never made it past any kind of inspection regarding its airworthiness. In fact, I am rather amazed that it made it as far as it did, before someone realized that it would wind up being an aluminum coffin. At least a modicum of common sense finally did prevail. Some questions, and/or statements that I do not see (at least as often as I think they should be addressed) on the List, are those that are directly related to, and concerning safety. For instance; How safe do you think your machine would be, with a few *extra* holes drilled in its structural members? The RV series of aircraft are stressed for a specific number of positive and negative *Gs.* This is providing everything is done correctly, according to the plans. To what degree might these stress factors be degraded, by mistakes left uncorrected? If you took your airplane kit to a certificated A&P (preferably a good one) to build for you, would you be willing to accept the kind of quality from him or her, if they told you they had drilled a *few extra holes* in a stringer, rib, or bulkhead flange, but that you wont be able to see them, once the skins are on? Not me!!! Do you envision the probability that one day, you will be wanting to sell this aircraft to someone else? Is this condition one that will be at the forefront of disclosure? Will pictures of the *extra holes* be included in your construction log, along with the repairs you made, if any, to correct your mistakes? For my particular project, I am having to rebuilt the entire horizontal stabilizer. My evaluation- so far- has indicated that *quality* workmanship was sacrificed in the quest for speed of project completion, and the obvious desire to save a few bucks. I have not done anything more than a cursory evaluation of the wings, fuselage, or flight controls, other than to have looked them over sufficiently as to realize that I will be replacing/rebuilding a lot of the parts that I consider out of limits. (Vans can definitely expect to hear from me on a fairly regular basis.) Im not building a showpiece, so youll probably never see me in the winners circle at Oshkosh. I am, however, building my airplane to fly. The prime consideration that I try to keep in mind, is that it is going to be my keyster sitting in the seat, just behind the instrument panel. The individual riding along behind me, will more than likely be someone who is quite near and dear to me. Safety is of the utmost importance to me. Someone said that *perfection* is impossible. I will not presume to disagree with that. I will add, however, that the *pursuit* of perfection is NOT impossible. When the pursuit of perfection falls a bit short of the mark, then take the steps required to make the necessary repairs to maintain structural integrity, and move on. Do this, even at the risk of having to swallow your pride once in a while. Swallowing pride, is a heck of a lot easier on one, than trying to swallow the third rock from the sun, at about 210 MPH. Flight safety begins, when you receive your empennage kit. Build safe, and fly safe. Regards Wendell WBWard(at)AOL.COM Slave to the Junkyard Dog RV-4 S/No. 4239 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jones, Bryan D. (LPT)" <JonesB(at)geon.com>
Subject: Begining Empanage!
Date: Nov 20, 1997
If you are talking about avgas/gasoline, it vaporizes - I don't believe it causes a threat to the groundwater supply (in small quantities). The current belief is that this small, incidental spilled gasoline causes air pollution. This is why gas stations in dense metropolitan areas have been required to install vapor recovery systems. My opinion is that this threat is about as insignificant as the claimed threat caused by weed eaters and lawn mowers. We have some pretty big problems in this country and this isn't one of them. Personally, I kill the fire ant beds near the hanger. Now, you talk about a threat... Bryan Jones JONESB(at)GEON.COM > << > I replace the water fairly often... I just chuck it out over the > concrete, > aiming for it to kill the moss and stuff, and to stop the grass from > growing over the path. > >> > Just thought I'd let you know - you might end up sending these > chemicals to > your grand kids water supply - maybe even your own!! > > At the Flight School - where I rent, they even have me pour the fuel > samples > into a gas can by the pumps - so it does wreck the pavement, and so > that it > doesn't get into the eater supply - as they are on a well nearby!! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dudly(at)onlinecol.com
Date: Nov 20, 1997
Subject: help
I have been trying to get on your mailing list for the RV-4 newsletter, so far I have not been able to figure how to get through, fill out the application. Sincerely, Spence Bergner ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 20, 1997
From: "joseph.wiza" <joe(at)mcione.com>
Subject: Duckworks landing lights
Has anyone installed these lights in the wings?Following the instructions I used the template to cut out the holes in the wing. After this point things became hazy. Oversized flat washers with counter sunk bolts just dont make sense. The examples consist of four black and white photo's which are not very clear. I called Don Wintz (not sure of spelling) at 503 696 7185 and all I get is a tape recording. Might be I need to turn my crystal ball a couple degrees. Joe/wing joe(at)mcione.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 20, 1997
From: Bob Reiff <Reiff(at)execpc.com>
Subject: $95 GPS
I received a sporting goods catalog which lists the new pocket size 12 channel "GPS Pioneer" by Magellan for $94.95. Includes 100 pt storage and 1 route with 10 legs. Specs include all the basic fuctions, but doesn't give max speed. Bob Reiff ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Oh, the choices
From: tcraig-stearman(at)juno.com (John T. Craig-Stearman)
Date: Nov 20, 1997
Paul, Boy, is that an easy one. Build the RV-4! It handles much more nimbly than the RV-6, has a tailwheel vice the RV-6A, and is undeniably prettier. If price were not a factor, I would recommend the RV-8 for the extra passenger and baggage room. But if you have found a $7,000 RV-4 kit, buy it now! Regards, Tom Craig-Stearman tcraig-stearman(at)juno.com RV-4 installing nutplates for wing intersection fairings writes: > >People, I have encountered a crisis. Well, maybe not a crisis, but >certainly a dilemma. I am just about ready to complete my order for >my -6A, >and suddenly the -4 is growing on me..fast. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 23, 1997
From: MoeJoe <moejoe03(at)erols.com>
Subject: smiley rivets
I just finished riveting my HS rear spar. It's the first time I ever bucked rivets, and I have alot (about 10-15) rivets with "smiley" faces on them. I think I know why I did it, I was holding the gun with an injured hand (the reason I was bucking and not squeezing in the first place), and it was too shaky with the gun. The problem was solved about halfway through when I switched gun hands. Are these rivets structurally sound? Van's manual says they are OK, but ugly. I dread having to drill all these out. I drilled 2 or 3 that were so screwed up they left dings in the HS-609s, and of the three, I messed one up so bad I had to put a larger rivet in the hole. Should I continue, or start over? Any help is greatly appreciated. I am also thinking of starting a small list for builders just opening the box. Nothing as exotic as Matt's list, just a small group of newbies who wish to correspond regularly about the very basic first steps of building. If you are interested, drop me an email. Moe Colontonio RV-8 Emp moejoe03(at)erols.com exposed fasteners (e.g. tip-up roll-over); or is not to be finish painted at all (e.g. rear plexy or baggage floor etc. that will be covered by material). Hope this helps. Les Williams/RV-6AQ/Tacoma WA I am just now drilling my fuselage skeleton so my comments are all out of ignorance. It has occurred to me that one could paint the parts of the skeleton that will show after assembly, then paint the inside of the skins that will show, then rivet it together. This would leave the rivet heads unpainted and probably bucking bar marks. What are other disadvantages of this approach? I am thinking through the whole assembly/painting sequence to figure out the best time to paint and, never having done this before, I am having some difficulty. Suggestions would be appreciated. Ken Harrill RV - 6 fuselage skeleton cause of the performance increase that it provides over a fixed pitch prop. Otherwise, I wouldn't have CONTRIBUTED my time to its development. JIm Ayers Less_Drag(at)juno.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Fesenbek, Gary" <gfesenbek(at)meridium.com>
Subject: Fuel tank in crash
Date: Nov 19, 1997
The experts can help you design a survivable fuel system for your aircraft, however there are some easy to do things you can do without even turning a wrench on the aircraft. It's called Nomex, and all military flyers wear it. I still have my suits from the service but I think they run about $200 commercially. Also, don't forget that canopy cutting knife! Safe landings. Gary, 6A - HS609 and eliminate the rubbing? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 19, 1997
Subject: Re: Gear Fairings
<< Tracy Saylor's are $195, made for the RV-6, and come with a bracket to attach them securely to the gear leg with hose clamp. >> Tim- I used Tracy's gear leg fairings on my 6A. They are first rate and look dynamite! Much better than stock ones. I heartily recommend them. They are easy to install but I preferred to not drill any holes in the trailing edge and instead just taped them with Kapton tape to keep them from racking and clamped them lightly between two pieces of aluminum angle with spring clamps until the flox and vinylester cured. They are straight as an arrow. You clamp them to the top of the gear leg and then with the weight off the gear you align them and foam them in place top and bottom with the two-part foam. -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 1997
From: randall(at)edt.com (Randall Henderson)
Subject: Re: Fuselage Interior Painting
> << Is it advisable to paint the > interior prior to installing all the cables, rudder pedels, seats, > electric flaps, and other miscellaneous items >> > > IMO, yes, if you are able. It yields a higher quality appearance. Compare a > repainted auto with the original paint job and you'll see what I mean. I agree. The trick is to not scratch up your paint installing everything. Get some of that thin foam packing material and wrap it around corners that could get scuffed, tape it on with masking tape. Use the kind of tape that's made for delicate surfaces and doesn't have much "stick" to it so it will be easy to remove. Use lots of towels, foam pads, etc. to cover floor and seat surfaces. You'll still have some touch-up to do but it will be a lot easier than painting after everything's in there. Randall Henderson, RV-6 randall(at)edt.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MAlexan533(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 24, 1997
Subject: Compass and Fuel Quantity Required?
I am laying out my instrument panel for an RV-8 to be completed eventually. My question is; Am I required to install fuel quantity indicators and a compass or are these optional? These are items I have never used on my RV-4 and wonder if I should leave them out as part of my weight saving plan? Opinions, please? MAlexan533(at)aol.com riation in the outer diameter of the tubing, due to the corrugations, cause the tubing to move around a bit. Would chafing be a problem if not anchored into each rib? I've thought of using thin wall PVC, but there's just something lacking in the aesthetics department there! Heck, I used the stuff for my garden irrigation system fer cryin out loud...:) Any thoughts? Brian Denk -8 #379 riveting ribs to spars ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 23, 1997
From: Don McNamara <mcnamara(at)sbt.infi.net>
Subject: Re: Duckworks landing lights
joseph.wiza wrote: > Has anyone installed these lights in the wings?Following the instructions I > used the template to cut out the holes in the wing. After this point > things became hazy. Oversized flat washers with counter sunk bolts just > dont make sense. The examples consist of four black and white photo's > which are not very clear. Joe-- I also did a lot of head scratching when I looked at the kit. However, in retrospect, things go together pretty simply. If you have anyone in your area who has already installed the kit, a visit will clear things up. I meant to contact Don Wentz with similar complaints, but never did. A couple of well-drawn diagrams would be much more helpful than the photos. Another thing to keep in mind is that you can modify them as you see fit. It's your plane. --Don McNamara wings still ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 24, 1997
From: Tom Martin <fairlea(at)execulink.com>
Subject: Re: GPS ANTENNA PLACEMENT ON RV6
A >an RV6/A? The instructions state that it should be placed topside as it >needs to have a line of sight to the GPS Satellite System. I saw a picture of a 6 that had the antennea located under the cowl in the engine compartment, any thoughts out there? Tom Martin RV4 going in a box this week to England! ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: The case for critical thinking . . .
<3.0.1.16.19971118093824.22278bae(at)dtc.net>
From: smcdaniels(at)juno.com (SCOTT R MCDANIELS)
Date: Nov 18, 1997
Bob (and all participants), First off I think I gave a bad impression; that I was offended by your response. I wasn't, but do have concerns about the direction I have seen some strings go. You are correct in saying that any of us contributing should be willing substantiate what we say if asked, I did feel like I was more put on the spot than asked questions (my misinterpretation). I can appreciate your comment of not having enough time (on top of that I'm not very accomplished on a key board) which is part of the reason I didn't directly respond to your questions Bottom line though is that I had a concern for the list that there may be a lot of people on the list with good ideas that are intimidated away from participating because of some of the discussion that they see. Like I said before; no hard feelings, and I enthusiastically except your offer. Sincerely Scott Mc ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 1997
From: Tom Martin <fairlea(at)execulink.com>
Subject: Re: Oh, the choices
A >Paul: > >Evaluate your long term needs. If this is a family project including >finacing/help/enjoyment you will never be sorry to build a 6/6A. On any >type of x-country it will get very boring to sit in the back of a tandem. >Your PAX and even the best of wifes will get frustrated/annoyed/antsie etc. >Don't let the looks fool you into something you will regret later. Remember >all the convertible cars around. Yes they are great to look at, but less to >drive. > I have to take a shot at this one! Check out the width of the cockpit in a six with two people side by side. Now add up the width of the RV4 or RV8. You have a lot more room in the tandem aircraft. As far as sitting in the back goes, the visiblity is excellent and I have had no complaints. Most of our flying is around home with a few crosscountry trips thrown in. You just cannot beat center line seating from a pilots perspective. Tom Martin RV-4 sold HR2 on the gear! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: gasobek(at)juno.com
Date: Nov 24, 1997
Subject: Re: GPS ANTENNA PLACEMENT ON RV6
I have an Apollo 360. It came with a length of coax to hook it up. RG-58A if I remember. The engineeering book I checked, lists it as having a lower loss than RG-58 C/U. Apollo recommends using a higher quality coax if the installation from the receiver to antenna is longer than the 15 foot they supply. When I looked up the price of the coax, I mounted the antenna where they recommended. Top, behind the sliding canopy. I considered placing it under the cowl but the manufactures spec for the antenna does not rate the antenna to a high enough temperature. I think it was 50 C. The installation under the fiberglass does attenuate the signal but not enough that I would worry about. I was not going to run the risk of destroying a $300 antenna. The GPS signal strength can be monitored on one of the receiver menu screens. I drove around the airport in my pick-up with the antenna located in the bed with and without the top of the cowl above the antenna to check signal strength. I base my comment of the fibergalss attenuating the signal on the results. Gary A. Sobek RV-6 N157GS O-320 Hartzell writes: > >>Does anyone have any recommendations at to the placement of a GPS >Antenna on >>an RV6/A? > > The the fellow with the outstanding looking 6A located his GPS >ant. >inside the wing tip and is quoted as working very good..... > >Have a good one. > Denny RV-6 > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 24, 1997
From: "I THINK, THEREFORE YOU ARE" <PKIRKPATRICK(at)FAB9.intel.com>
Subject: Re: GPS ANTENNA PLACEMENT ON RV6
I was out in Camarrillo last week and saw a GPS antenna mounted just under the cowling on a bracket a few inches in front of the firewall. The antenna had a good view of the sky from its location and should work great. Temps where it was mounted shouldn't get much hotter than an antenna on a dark surface in the sun and the fiberglass is almost transparent to the GPS signals. Pat Kirkpatrick RV-6A starting fuse ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 24, 1997
Subject: Re: Duckworks landing lights
<< I called Don Wintz (not sure of spelling) at 503 696 7185 and all I get is a tape recording. Might be I need to turn my crystal ball a couple degrees. Joe/wing joe(at)mcione.com >> Joe: Contact Don Wentz : jwentz@columbia-center.org Check six! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 21, 1997
From: "Anderson Ed" <AndersonE(at)bah.com>
Subject: List Status! Please Read...
Thanks for update, Matt Ed ---------- From: Matt G. Dralle 510-606-1001 Subject: RV-List: List Status! Please Read... Date: Thursday, November 20, 1997 6:22PM 510-606-1001) Listers, As promised, Matronics is upgrading their Internet connectivitiy this week. As you might have noticed, there havn't been any List messages for a couple of days. Processing of List traffic has been disabled until I am confident that everything is stable and all MX and domain records have been updated correctly. As you might have guessed, this is not the case just yet and I hope to have things back online by the weekend. Please *do not* post any messages to the List until I announce that connectivity has been completely restored. Any messages that have been posted in the last couple of days have been queued and I will forward them when things are working correctly. Thanks! Matt Dralle RV-List Admin. Matronics -- Matt G. Dralle | Matronics | P.O. Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 510-606-1001 Voice | 510-606-6281 FAX | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ W.W.W. | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 24, 1997
From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls(at)aeroelectric.com>
Subject: re: the case for critical thinking . . .
> You are correct in saying that any of us contributing should be >willing substantiate what we say if asked, I did feel like I was more put >on the spot than asked questions (my misinterpretation). It's a natural feeling. You should see some of the exchanges bewteen myself and Paul Messinger over on the Kitfox list. Paul and I got off to a rocky start some months ago but we've forged an association upon which I place much value. We jump right into each other's laps from time-to-time and I sometimes have the same reaction you're describing . . . but after I READ the words, work to deduce the meaning and reply with the goal of clarifying ideas and facts, the bottom line is we both benefit. By conducting the conversation in front of list members, those who choose to tap the data flow can benefit too. Debate is necessary, sometimes even heated debate . . . I can get pretty wound up with some of my best friends. We just keep grin'n while we're talking . . . that's the real problem with cyber-speak . . . no real good way to > Bottom line though is that I had a concern for the list that >there may be a lot of people on the list with good ideas that are >intimidated away from participating because of some of the discussion >that they see. Hey, the best things in life are not won without breaking a sweat or getting your heals nipped. There is an old adage about keeping out of the kitchen if you can't stand the heat! For those who find probing, perhaps heated conversation concomfortable, drop one of the participants a direct e-mail with your idea or comment. As a matter of courtesy, anyone who receives the idea should add it to the conversation without directly involving or even revealing the source. It doesn't matter where the idea originates as long as it gets due consideration. Above all we need to keep reminding ourselves and those who watch us that the goal here is to build the best airplanes that have ever existed. Having said that, we know that the "bell-curve" is a fact of nature . . . it's shape can be bent toward trash or excellence but in the final analysis there's always going to be some airplanes built that you and I wouldn't want to ride in. What we do here can only tend to advance the whole. > Like I said before; no hard feelings, and I enthusiastically >except your offer. > Where do you live? Bob . . . AeroElectric Connection //// (o o) ===========o00o=(_)=o00o========= ================================= <http://www.aeroelectric.com> ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 24, 1997
From: Craig Hiers <craig-RV4(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Fuselage Interior Painting
Randall Henderson wrote: > I agree. The trick is to not scratch up your paint installing > everything. Get some of that thin foam packing material and wrap it > around corners that could get scuffed, tape it on with masking tape. > Use the kind of tape that's made for delicate surfaces and doesn't have > much "stick" to it so it will be easy to remove. Use lots of towels, > foam pads, etc. to cover floor and seat surfaces. You'll still have > some touch-up to do but it will be a lot easier than painting after > everything's in there. > > Randall Henderson, RV-6 > randall(at)edt.com I see some interior's lined with some type of cloth. any opinions on this route? Does anyone have the URL for infinity stick grips? Craig Hiers ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 24, 1997
From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls(at)aeroelectric.com>
Subject: Anyone surprised? (fluff)
>CESSNA REVISES SINGLE-ENGINE PRICING: EARLY BUYERS GOT A DEAL? >Remember all the grousing about the price of a new Skyhawk or Skylane? >Well, turns out the early birds are a steal. The company told AVweb >last last week that it has increased the price of both the model 172R >Skyhawk and 182S Skylane. The base price on the Skyhawk climbs from >$124,500 to $133,700, while the price of the Skylane goes from $190,600 >to $217,900. Some previous options are now standard, as is a three >bladed prop on the Skylane. IMHO, anyone who truly believes that certified aviation, including the much touted AGATE program is going to "revitalize general aviation" has been paying too much attention to the speeches of bureaucrats and marketing executives. If there IS to be a future, I'll suggest it's right HERE Bob . . . AeroElectric Connection //// (o o) ===========o00o=(_)=o00o========= ================================= <http://www.aeroelectric.com> ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jerry H. Prado" <jerryprado(at)wa.net>
Subject: Re: Wing conduit installation
Date: Nov 24, 1997
I am using some heat shrink tubing to add rigidity and protect the segments that are in contact with the ribs. 1 1/4" dia. will not collapse the conduit when fully shrunk and will create a snug fit. Jerry Prado RV6a - still on the wings. -----Original Message----- From: Brian Denk <akroguy(at)hotmail.com> Date: Monday, November 24, 1997 2:38 AM Subject: RV-List: Wing conduit installation > >Greetings friends, > >I just received some of the corrugated plastic conduit from Van's for >routing the tip and landing light wiring through my -8 wings. Does the >conduit need to be anchored (glued???) into each rib so it doesn't shift >around during flight? The holes are just large enough to allow the >tubing to fit through..but the variation in the outer diameter of the >tubing, due to the corrugations, cause the tubing to move around a bit. >Would chafing be a problem if not anchored into each rib? I've thought >of using thin wall PVC, but there's just something lacking in the >aesthetics department there! Heck, I used the stuff for my garden >irrigation system fer cryin out loud...:) > >Any thoughts? > >Brian Denk >-8 #379 >riveting ribs to spars > >______________________________________________________ >Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 1997
From: John Walsh <walsh@matrix-one.com>
Subject: Re: Fire suppression, crashworthiness
Now that was interesting! I have a few more questions if you would indulge me.... Using halon properly, a breathable >environment can be produced that will not support combustion. I'm trying to understand how a halon setup would work in an accident. I understand how it would work in a closed environment ( like a computer room ). However, in an accident, the engine compartment, passenger compartment etc. are essentially ripped open to some extent. In this scenario, it would seem that the gas would simply be dissipated leaving the hot engine to start a fire. Any thoughts on this? Do you have any special plans for your own airplane? >I don't have any stats on header tank susceptibility, but I haven't >personally noted any difference. If a tank ruptures, the fuel sprays and >runs everywhere. In an impact crater, it doesn't matter if it originated >inside the fuse or outside! Very interesting. I guess the good news is that I can stop avoiding airplanes with header tanks. Thanks again John ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 1997
From: Mike Wills <willsm(at)nosc.mil>
Subject: Re: Oh, the choices
Spoken like a true -8 owner/builder! Its not as pretty as a -4, and you'll have to prove to me that its faster than a comparably powered and propped -4. You got me on the baggage and passenger space, but its also more expensive. If faster, roomier, sexier, is what you really want talk to Mark Frederick about the Harmon Rocket. All the above said with tongue in cheek. Its a personal decision based on wants and needs. Seriously, whatever you decide on, make sure its what you really want. Dont be swayed by others opinions, cost, or practicallity, if these things are leading you away from what you really want. Its hard enough to stay focused on the building, without having to deal with the mental anguish of knowing that you are expending all this effort on a project you dont really want. Mike Wills RV-4(wings done!, saving pennies for fuse) willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil > >What about a -8? It has the looks of the -4, the baggage capacity of the >-6, and is faster than both! > >Moe Colontonio >-8 emp >Cherry Hill, NJ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 24, 1997
From: Thomas Velvick <rver(at)caljet.com>
Subject: Re: Wing conduit installation
>I just received some of the corrugated plastic conduit from Van's for >routing the tip and landing light wiring through my -8 wings. Does the >conduit need to be anchored (glued???) into each rib so it doesn't shift >around during flight? The holes are just large enough to allow the >tubing to fit through..but the variation in the outer diameter of the >tubing, due to the corrugations, cause the tubing to move around a bit. >Would chafing be a problem if not anchored into each rib? I've thought >of using thin wall PVC, but there's just something lacking in the >aesthetics department there! Heck, I used the stuff for my garden >irrigation system fer cryin out loud...:) > >Any thoughts? I am planning on putting RTV on each of the ribs its goes thru. Regards, Tom Velvick RV-6 wings rver(at)caljet.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 24, 1997
From: "joseph.wiza" <joe(at)mcione.com>
Subject: Whelen power supply
I'm about to mount the whelen A490A TS CF power supply's on the end of the wings somewhere. Looks like its going to be the end rib or the outboard end of the spar. I dont like the idea of drilling into the spar????? Joe/wing looking for lost fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "kevin lane" <n3773(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Christmas gifts
Date: Nov 19, 1997
It's that time of year again guys, well, and Cheryl. That time of year where we can justify additional tool purchases to SAVE MONEY! Yes, we're builders and expected to give gifts and we have the ability to make out own gifts if we only had a _____________(fill in), well, yes, some free time too, but let's not get caught up with details. So how 'bout some great holiday gift ideas, preferably riveted, and maybe needing a pneumatic squeezer, to cut down on the build time. my contribution - my brother works as product designer for a mtn. bike company, so these guys latch on to any buzz word they can in order to come up with the latest and greatest. Last years big hit was a tree shaped ornament from aluminum. Big deal right? Prominently displayed was the "Reynolds 2024-T2" (or whatever the skins say). This is as hot as "billet machined" or "CAD" in the bike industry. Exotic stuff, got a garage full of the scraps. I saw am aluminum sunglasses case, $140, real Range Rovery, rivets around all the seams. Hmmmm, with a sheet metal pan break I could...... kevin 6A ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 24, 1997
From: Marc DeGirolamo <mdee(at)dlcwest.com>
Subject: Re: Wing conduit installation
> > Does the >conduit need to be anchored (glued???) into each rib so it doesn't shift >around during flight? I put the same conduit in my wings. I made the hole just big enough that I had to stretch the condit in order to get it to go in easily. It is still a fairly loose in the hole but because of the ribbed design will not move inboard/outboard . I did however, clean the hole out to a 400 grit finish so that even if it does move shouldn't chaff the hose. If you made your holes so large that the conduit moves through them I would suggest that you only need to tighten it up in a few of the ribs,say four.This should be sufficient to hold everything from moving. Maybe finding a rubber grommet which will make the hole a smaller diameter will work for you. Happy Building Marc DeGirolamo RV-4 drilling VS to fuse/HS Saskatoon , Canada Marc DeGirolamo RV-4 Saskatoon,SK. Canada ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 24, 1997
From: Bob Nuckolls <nuckolls(at)aeroelectric.com>
Subject: re: paralleled batteries
>not good to have two (batteries) in parallel, if 1 shorts youve got a tremendious drain >on the other in an instant, check out the recreational veh. people they have >battery isolators. Let's look at the physics of the matter. How do batteries short? (-) to (+) terminal or one-cell-at-a-time? If a 12-volt battery shorts a single cell, it becomes a 10-volt battery. Now the ideal charging voltage for the battery becomes 11.5 volts as opposed to the 13.8 or so that exists on the bus. How does the system react? The battery becomes another load on the system. How much of a load? Consider the following: If ideal charging voltage is 2.3 volts per cell (13.8/6) and we've now got a 10 volt battery (13.8/5) the voltage applied to each cell is now 2.76 volts . . . an increase of .46 volts per cell. Hmmmm, how much current will a cell draw if "overcharged" by .46 volts? We could find out by applying 16.5 volts to a fully charged battery. When this test was conducted in the laboratory on the B&C RG batteries, the charging current eventually fell to less than 1 amp and the battery temperature rose less than 10 degrees C. The battery quietly went south. From experience, I'll guess that it won't exceed 20 amps and that for only a short time. If it's a "flooded" battery, the liquid in the working cells begins to disassociate rapidly into hydrogen/ oxygen gasses . . . plates get bubbles on them and internal resistance tends to rise. RG batteries have so little water in them that severe abuse tends to "poof" the littel bit of water out the pressure relief valves and it's all over. Flooded batteries will vent a lot of hydrogen/oxygen in this mode and quite frankly, THIS is the real hazard to continued flight. They may spit liquid water/acid out the caps too. This is why they need a battery box. The RG battery will sit there and quietly die . . . you won't know it happened until you check the battery during next preflight. Now, let's assume there's another battery in parallel with the first. The alternator is probably going to carry the excess 20 amps or so needed to supply the extra demand of the failing battery. Bus voltage will stay up where it belongs and except for an abnormally high alternator loadmeter reading, you probably won't notice anything. If the added load causes the alternator to go into current limit, the bus voltage sags. How far? Depends on the total load and some alternator characteristics. If below 13.0 volts you SHOULD get a low volts warning light to tell you something is amiss. But in any case, the votage isn't going to drop enough to even begin to discharge the battery that's still okay. Recall that a battery can DELIVER energy at 12.5 volts or LESS. Once you get a low-voltage light, if you want to play airborne systems analysis and/or mechanic, you could turn the batteries off one at a time to see if the low-volts light goes out. When you do de-select the failed battery, the bus will come back up and light will go out. On the other hand, if you have developed a "plan-b" for electrical systems malfunctions, flipping three switches at most automatically selects the alternate mode of operation and you get back with the piloting task at hand. The important item to note from this analysis is that while one battery is dying, the otherone is not affected in any way that requires immediate attention from the pilot. basicaly two high current diodes, alt power goes into the >common and comes out as 2 isolated outputs 1 for each battery. worked great >on my race boat and rv, now its my planes turn. Battery isolators have been around for years for a variety of applications none of which have anything to do with protecting one battery from the ravages of another battery. They are commonly used in situations where there is minimal instrumentation and no need for "Plan-B" development and implimentation. Their primary value is to allow one to charge a battery in a trailer/boat from the towing vehicle system while preventing the towed appliance from loading the vehicle battery. I had an uncle who stuck himself way out in the boonies because he'd run down BOTH batteries while sitting and could not start his truck. The reason we use paralleled batteries in airplanes is so that they may share engine cranking duties by virtue of high-current, hard connections to the system via battery contactors. By making them the same size, we can rotate the installed batteries once a year . . . put a new one in the main slot, move the 1 year old main to the aux slot and put the old aux battery in your lawn mower. Next year, repeat the exercise. When no battery is more than two years old and one battery is always less than one year old, the likelyhood of the shorted cell scenario even occuring is very, very close to ZERO. If it should happen, it's no big deal. In the mean time, you enjoy a VERY reliable power generation/storage system for keeping essential goodies running. Bob . . . AeroElectric Connection //// (o o) ===========o00o=(_)=o00o========= ================================= <http://www.aeroelectric.com> ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 24, 1997
From: "John B. Abell" <jbabell(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Fuselage Interior Painting
> Does anyone have the URL for infinity stick grips? > > Craig Hiers e-mail: 72124.347(at)compuserve.com Home page: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/INFINITY_Aerospace Jack Abell RV-6A N333JA (Reserved) Los Angeles ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Cafgef(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 24, 1997
Subject: Re: $95 GPS
<< >I received a sporting goods catalog which lists the new pocket size 12 >channel "GPS Pioneer" by Magellan for $94.95. Includes 100 pt storage >and 1 route with 10 legs. Specs include all the basic fuctions, but >doesn't give max speed. >> There is one as described that has been advertized in some boating magazines. Look for it there. I don't believe it has much of a data base or speed computing power. Gene Francis ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mikel(at)dimensional.com
Date: Nov 24, 1997
Subject: Re: First Flight
Hey, listers: Kelli and I are proud to announce that today, the 24th of November, 1997, RV-4 232 Suzie Q took to the air. (!) No problems other than the Right Rudder Blues (I should have offset the rudder more than 1/4 inch). Flew like a dream. I have never been in an "unfamiliar" airplane before that felt more comfortable and familiar. I have "several hundred" hours of just sitting in it in the garage getting familar with it and I think that really helped. I will give more particulars later. Gotta leave town for a few days. Celebrating in Colorado Michael N 232 Suzie Q ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 24, 1997
From: "Randy J. Pflanzer" <rpflanze(at)iquest.net>
Subject: Battery Wires
I'm confused and could use a little help. I built the battery box for my RV-6 per the instructions and plan to install it per the instructions at the base of the firewall inside the cockpit. The top and sides are riveted together so that the box comes off in one piece. Where do you run the wires from the battery so that the cover can still come off? I must be missing something obvious here. Also, where would be a good place to mount the starter and battery solenoids. My firewall has the constant speed prop box on it. Can I mount it on the slope of the box? Do the solenoids need to be mounted vertically. I'd appreciate any help. Randy Pflanzer RV-6 N417G (Just received Finishing Kit with new type-S cowls!!) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mick_G" <micky_g(at)email.msn.com>
Subject: Re: First Flight
Date: Nov 24, 1997
Congratulations! Mick -----Original Message----- From: mikel(at)dimensional.com <mikel(at)dimensional.com> Date: Monday, November 24, 1997 2:09 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: First Flight > >Hey, listers: Kelli and I are proud to announce that today, the 24th of >November, 1997, RV-4 232 Suzie Q took to the air. (!) No problems other >than the Right Rudder Blues (I should have offset the rudder more than 1/4 >inch). Flew like a dream. I have never been in an "unfamiliar" airplane >before that felt more comfortable and familiar. I have "several hundred" >hours of just sitting in it in the garage getting familar with it and I >think that really helped. I will give more particulars later. Gotta leave >town for a few days. > >Celebrating in Colorado > >Michael > >N 232 Suzie Q > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 24, 1997
From: Bob Reiff <Reiff(at)execpc.com>
Subject: $95 GPS
Bob Reiff wrote: > >I received a sporting goods catalog which lists the new pocket size 12 > >channel "GPS Pioneer" by Magellan for $94.95. Robert L. Nuckolls, III wrote: > did it give a model number? Nope, just the name "GPS Pioneer". Says it's a new model available in November. The photo doesn't look like the model 2000. > if you can return the critter if you don't like it, > by all means give it a try. if it's indeed one of the > 2000 series receivers, i'm betting youl'll keep it. Actually I already have a GPS (Skyforce). I posted the info for the benefit of anyone else who is interested. Bob Reiff RV4 #2646, skinning fuselage. Reiff Preheat Systems FAA-PMA engine preheaters, RV wing skin heaters. http://www.execpc.com/reiff ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wing conduit installation
From: tcraig-stearman(at)juno.com (John T. Craig-Stearman)
Date: Nov 24, 1997
Brian, If you cut the holes in the ribs to the smaller dimension of the conduit, the ridges will lock the conduit in place at each rib. No glue is required. Regards, Tom Craig-Stearman tcraig-stearman(at)juno.com RV-4 wings permanently mounted! writes: > >Greetings friends, > >I just received some of the corrugated plastic conduit from Van's for >routing the tip and landing light wiring through my -8 wings. Does the > >conduit need to be anchored (glued???) into each rib? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 24, 1997
From: Dave Barnhart <barnhart(at)a.crl.com>
Subject: Cablecraft controls
If you have received Chief Aircraft's new catalog, you'll notice that they have a nice little picture and listing for Cablecraft engine control cables. It also turns out that Chief Aircraft is not able to speak intelligently on this subject. The salesman finally gave me the telephone number for Cablecraft (253-475-1080). Nor only was the guy at Cablecraft very knowledgable and able to answer all my questions, he was able to sell me the cables too, and at a price slightly better than Chief! Best Regards, Dave Barnhart rv-6 sn 23744 N601DB installing exhaust down to the last 90 percent r than 303 hose. It also has a pretty blue outer sleeve (It's a shame to cover it with firesleeve). They made the hoses and pressure tested them fore me while I waited. All-in-All, my two 16-inch hoses cost me $37 including tax. Best Regards, Dave Barnhart rv-6 sn 23744 N601DB installing exhaust down to the last 90 percent ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BPattonsoa(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 24, 1997
Subject: Getting in a -6 Slider
Now that I have the Inst panel and firewall fwrd 99% done, (this means only 25% of the work is left), I find myself getting in and out a lot. When the windsheild and its fairing that covers the rollbar is on, the only good handhold goes away. Have to admit I am not as flexible as I was when the ship was started, and am over 6-2" with a scar down my back from overestimating my athlethic ability 30+ years ago. So, how do you ladies and gents of the slightly age challenged variety get in and out? My bird is a slider, but the tilt has nothing to grab on to either. I have given some thought to a handle, removeable, on the rollbar. Something to pull on to lift up, or settle down. Thoughts?????? Bruce Patton ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 24, 1997
From: Craig Hiers <craig-RV4(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel tank in crash
Fesenbek, Gary wrote: > > > The experts can help you design a survivable fuel system for your > aircraft, however there are some easy to do things you can do without > even turning a wrench on the aircraft. > > It's called Nomex, and all military flyers wear it. I still have my > suits from the service but I think they run about $200 commercially. > > Also, don't forget that canopy cutting knife! > > Safe landings. > > Gary, > 6A - HS609 > Be careful- Nomex will not not burn until it reaches a much higher temp compared to cotton or polyester. The down side to this is that the heat will pass through the nomex and burn your hide. Nomex is a step in the right direction, but avoiding the situation all together would be our first choice. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure Craig Hiers ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 24, 1997
From: Scott Johnson <rvgasj(at)popmail.mcs.net>
Subject: Oh, the choices
Paul, I just completed an RV6A with a tilt up canopy this past year. It is incredible because theres no bars or anything in my field of view ... its like sitting on a chair going 200 m.p.h. What a fantastic airplane. Since I am suffering from builders withdrawl, I ordered an RV8A last friday. I don't think I'll like the view as much because that plane has a bar that goes around the canopy right in front of your face. I normally look out my 6A at a 45 degree angle and theres no bar like the 8A. However, I didn't want to build another 6A because there wouldn't be any variety. How about it, you guys that have sliding canopies ... Do you get used to that canopy bar ? I sort of wonder if the guys that own sliding canopies and don't mind that bar have ever been in one that doesn't have one. Happy Building ... Scott Johnson RV6A Flying 70TT 345RV ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 24, 1997
From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls(at)aeroelectric.com>
Subject: Re: Battery Wires
>Also, where would be a good place to mount the starter and battery >solenoids. My firewall has the constant speed prop box on it. Can I mount >it on the slope of the box? Do the solenoids need to be mounted vertically. >I'd appreciate any help. Battery contactor as close as practical to battery (+) post, starter contactor at some point on firewall so that wire routed from starter gets shortest route to contactor. There's a few tales out there regarding orientation of contactor with respect to potential g-loading. In a high performance aerobatic machine, perhaps. They don't worry about it in Mooney's, Pipers, Bonanzas, etc. I wouldn't worry about it in my own traveling machine. Analysis sez that contactors can be inadvertently close in ladings on the order of 6-10 g's Bob . . . AeroElectric Connection //// (o o) ===========o00o=(_)=o00o========= ================================= <http://www.aeroelectric.com> ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 24, 1997
From: Don <dhduck(at)flash.net>
Subject: rv-list subscription
Dear Sirs: Please remove me from the rv-list. Thank you Don Duck dhduck(at)flash.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 25, 1997
From: "Robert. S. McAnally" <mcarob(at)melbpc.org.au>
Subject: Frank Justices Instructions
Listers, Can anyone supply the current address for F.J's instructions. Thanks, Rob McAnally ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: RV-8 spar stuff
Date: Nov 25, 1997
Hey folks, Just a few comments thus far along in the wing kit. Boy, there sure isn't a lot of spar to pass through the fuse center section! Once I had the inner ribs in place..and saw just a few inches of spar left to join to the fuselage...just couldn't help but wonder how it can handle 9 G's without snapping right at the attach point. I know this is silly..and a proven design..but just gives me that funny feeling in my gut. And, the right main spar top side flange was over bent...i.e., more acute than the left spar top flange. So, the ribs were a VERRRY tight fit during initial drilling and alignment. The only way to alleviate the problem was to make several passes with the (wide)hand seamer along the full length and gently "suggest" it back to where it should be. It looks fine now..but I wonder if this has happened with anyone elses kit? It does not look like a shipping damage issue..more like it was just tweaked a bit too much at Phlogiston. Brian Denk framing the wings ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark D Hiatt" <ottopilot_msn(at)email.msn.com>
Subject: Re: Spam Fighter...
Date: Nov 25, 1997
Matt, I hope this works for you. But we've received word of several lists who add "Remove me" addresses to a "Hot" list indicating that the address is still valid, and thus more valuable to spammers. Ironically, on the old GEnie network, I get a tremendous amount of spam mail forwarded from an account that I have not used and that has not been listed in any directory since 1991! It gets forwarded to the address there that I do use, which rarely receives spam. I hope you've turned a corner on this thing, but I'd worry that responding would only send the message to someone that there really was someone home at that address. -- Mark D Hiatt Visit us on the new MSN v2.5! OttoPilot_MSN@msn.com http://Forums.msn.com/Aviation Aviation Forum Manager, AvChat Mondays 10pm Eastern The Microsoft Network > >Oddly, the fight seems to be working as I have recieved a number of >replys back saying that they have removed me and/or added me to a >Remove list. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HinkleyC(at)fca.gov
Date: Nov 25, 1997
Subject: Re: RV-8 spar stuff
* * * * The views expressed in this EMail are my own and do not represent the policy or position * * * * * * * * of the Farm Credit Administration. * * * * Hey Brian, If you get that funny feeling in your gut when you look at the RV-8 spar, then you want to make sure that you never, never, never ever look at the spar on a Cessna or Piper. Curtis Hinkley RV-8 N815RV reserved CHink11769 @ aol.com hinkleyc(at)fca.gov ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 25, 1997
From: Mark Nielsen <Mark.Nielsen@fiedler-lp.com>
Subject: Re: Battery Wires
> Where do you run the wires >from the battery so that the cover can still come off? Route the battery cables through the firewall at a level just below the top of the battery box. > Do the solenoids need to be mounted vertically. If you mount the solenoid so that the plunger is horizontal, you will pretty much eliminate the possibility of high G loads overcoming the spring in the solenoid and thereby closing the solenoid contacts. (It might get a little exciting if your starter motor kicked in just as you were pulling out of a loop.) Mark Nielsen RV-6; flying ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: RV-8 spar stuff
Date: Nov 25, 1997
From: Sam Ray <str(at)almaden.ibm.com>
Brian Denk wrote: >And, the right main spar top side flange was over bent...i.e., more >acute than the left spar top flange. So, the ribs were a VERRRY tight I had the same on my left spar and also used a hand seamer to loosen the rib fit. The right spar was ok. Regards, Sam Ray ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Desiccator question
Date: Nov 25, 1997
From: "Derrick L. Aubuchon" <n184da(at)cctrap.com>
Does anyone know the "proper" way to dry out desiccator plugs used in the spark plug holes? I know it requires time in the oven, but I was curious to know ahead of time if there was an accepted temperature & time. Thanks Derrick L. Aubuchon N184DA(at)cctrap.com RV4 N184DA in finishing stages,,, cowling almost complete. First engine run should be soon!! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 25, 1997
From: Dale Berger <gateway(at)en.com>
Subject: unsubscribe
________________________________________________________________________________
From: McManD(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 25, 1997
Subject: For Sale wheel pants 2 piece
--------------------- From: jbalbierer(at)nysyr.ang.af.mil Date: 97-11-25 08:29:03 EST Dave, Can you post on the RV list: RV-6(A) two piece main wheel fairings for sale. New in box. $150, Includes shipping. jbalbierer(at)nysyr.ang.af.mil (315)622-3846 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 25, 1997
From: Bob Nuckolls <nuckolls(at)aeroelectric.com>
Subject: Re: Desiccator question
> >Does anyone know the "proper" way to dry out desiccator plugs used in the >spark plug holes? I know it requires time in the oven, but I was curious >to know ahead of time if there was an accepted temperature & time. > >Thanks Are they colored desiccators? I forget whether they turn pink or blue when 'wet' but in any case, I don't think you can have them in the oven too long. You're just driving out the moisture absorbed by the internal media and you cannot get them too dry. One of the fellows I work with writes the manuals for packing our targets. We have bags of desiccant inside the sealed containers. For the BIG bags, he sez 250F for four hours is suggested. I gotta belive that the itty bitty plugs will dry out much faster. Bob . . . AeroElectric Connection //// (o o) ===========o00o=(_)=o00o========= ================================= <http://www.aeroelectric.com> ________________________________________________________________________________
From: PhilipR920(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 25, 1997
Subject: Re: Battery Wires
I drilled holes for the wires in the fwd fixed wall of the box and ran the wires straight fwd. The solenoids are mounted vertically (connections in horizonal plane)on the engine side of the firewall. I'm not sure about other mounting orientations. Phil Rogerson 6AQ60057 Fernandina Beach, FL ________________________________________________________________________________
From: jbalbierer(at)nysyr.ang.af.mil
Date: Nov 25, 1997
Subject: Van's 2 Piece Wheel Fairing for sale
charset=US-ASCII FOR SALE: 2 piece main wheel fairings for RV new in box. List: $180 Will sell for $150 to include shipping. New Gascolator also: $30(includes bracket)!! John Balbierer, RV-6, N30JB jbalbierer(at)nysyr.ang.af.mil (315) 454-6115 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 25, 1997
From: lottmc(at)datastar.net (Michael C. Lott)
Subject: weight and balance
This may be a dumb question, but, I need to know. I want to check my -4 out for maximum load in the back seat. If I figure, using the weight and balance like in the manual, that a 200 lb person can sit in the rear seat if I don't get down to less than half of my fuel capacity, does that mean 200 pounds sitting on the rear seat exactly? Or, are they taking into account the weight of the legs forward of that point? I am asking because I want to put 200 pounds of dead weight on the rear seat itself, and I want to make sure it won't put me aft of the cg so I can be safe, and get an accurate sensation of the flying qualities at that weight. If the figures are correct, and I can carry a 200 lb weight on the rear seat, when I figurea 200 lb person back there, is it really giving me a little safety margin, taking into account the weight of the legs forward of the seat position? Sorry if this doesn't make much sense, but I'd like to know. Thanks to any answers. Michael ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WBWard(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 25, 1997
Subject: Re: List Status! Please Read...
Matt Not much activity as yet, but I imagine that's gonna pick up real soon. Good job, and we thank you. Regards Wendell WBWard(at)AOL.COM ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WBWard(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 25, 1997
Subject: Re: RV-8 spar stuff
Brian I dont know how the spars are joined in the center section of the RV-8, but in the RV-4 kit that I have, the ends of the spars butt together, and are bolted together with some pretty healthy spar splice plates, and some hefty AN bolts. With the spars butted together that way, each spar kind of assists the other, by helping transmit some of the loading, from one to the other. If the RV-8 spar is spliced together thusly, you shouldnt have too much to worry about. As for being stressed to 9 Gs, Im sure Van, and the folks who work there have done all the proof testing on the design necessary to ascertain that figure. I might remind you of the fact that when you are using this 9 G figure in conversation, you are talking about the upper limit of the G envelope, and that this is a never exceed figure. Besides, when you are dancing around the skies pulling 6 to 8 Gs, you are already in red, brown, and blackout territory, and are performing some pretty aggressive aerobatics, for just about any light airplane. Something an old poop like me will leave to the younger guys, in all likelihood. Something you might want to consider, also, is the fact that as your airplane ages, such as with any machine, if it is not maintained in an *as new* condition, this high number will begin to gradually drop off. Some time back, someone asked why the wing would come of an airplane stressed for 9 Gs, at only 8.75 Gs? There are many answers to this, of which the age of the machine is most definitely one of them. How many times, over the lifespan of that airplane, was it exposed to high G stress maneuvers, approaching that upper limit? Are your spars flexible? Yes, to a degree, because they have to be, so the wings can flex. Every time you flex metal, there is some work hardening taking place. Take a wire coat hanger, expose it to constant flexing, and sooner or later the metal work hardens to a brittle state and the hanger breaks. Though this is an extreme example, the same thing is true for a metal airplane, and its structural members, spars, longerons, ribs, bulkheads, and in the case of a stressed skin airplane like the RVs, even the skins. This is one of the reasons I sent a posting titled *SAFETY* to the list recently, when someone sent in a posting concerning *extra holes* drilled in rib flanges. It sounds to me as though you did just about the only thing you could have done, to correct the overbending condition of your right wing spar top flange. Your description made it sound as though it was a very minor defect in the initial spar web forming. It happens. After all, we are all human, even the folks at Phlogiston. Clearly document what you had to do to the spar flange in your builders log, and drive on. Such a notation in the log, might prompt you, or someone else, to keep an eye on this particular area, throughout the lifetime of the airplane. Build safe, and fly safe. Regards Wendell WBWard(at)AOL.COM Slave to the Junkyard Dog RV-4 S/No 4239 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Cafgef(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 25, 1997
Subject: Re: Battery Wires
<< Where do you run the wires from the battery so that the cover can still come off? I must be missing something obvious here.>> I must have missed something too. I made access by also putting hindges at the top of the box. Also, where would be a good place to mount the starter and battery solenoids. >> I mounted the starter and battery solenoids on the top of my battery box. This arrangement means that I hook up the battery to my solenoids, then slip the box sides in place. I can pull the hindge pins and remove the box sides without disconecting all the conections. I suppose that it might be handy someday. So far in my building of RV's I have assembled and disassembled everything at least ten times it seems. Gene Francis, getting ready to smoke test the wiring. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 25, 1997
From: "joseph.wiza" <joe(at)mcione.com>
Subject: Frank Justin
Could anyone show me where I can down load Frank Justice (fuslage info) hate to be a pain but TU in advance. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 25, 1997
From: Craig Hiers <craig-RV4(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Desiccator question
Derrick L. Aubuchon wrote: > > > Does anyone know the "proper" way to dry out desiccator plugs used in the > spark plug holes? I know it requires time in the oven, but I was curious > to know ahead of time if there was an accepted temperature & time. > > Thanks > > Derrick L. Aubuchon > N184DA(at)cctrap.com > > RV4 N184DA in finishing stages,,, cowling almost complete. First engine > run should be soon!! > Derrick I take my toaster oven out side and put the plugs in over night. I set it on about 200-250, by morning they are almost back to there original blue. Craig Hiers ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 25, 1997
From: John Walsh <walsh@matrix-one.com>
Subject: Re: Oh, the choices
> >A >>Paul: >I have to take a shot at this one! Check out the width of the cockpit in a >six with two people side by side. Now add up the width of the RV4 or RV8. >You have a lot more room in the tandem aircraft. I've had a demo ride with Ken Scott in the factory 6A. I've also flown to OSH from the east coast in the back of an RV-4. Given the choice, I would opt for the back of the 4 every time. You're not sitting with your elbows overlapping the person next to you and vis is great, except of course right at 12:00. I'm 5'11" and 180. Allow me to suggest another approach. Rather than try to force your RV to be a Skylane, why not join a flying club? If you need to carry hundreds of pounds of baggage and want to take the wife, family etc., take the Skylane. That way you can build the RV that you really want and keep it light simple and CHEAP, the way Van intended. That's what I'm doing anyway. I have two kids ( at least) to plan for and the 4 of us aren't going to fit in any RV. John ( banging away on a -4 ) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Bumflyer(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 26, 1997
Subject: Re: installation of rudder cables to pedals
In a message dated 11/26/97 4:58:27 AM, you wrote: >I am thinking that eventually this will wear thru. Any advice? Can I use a >longer bolt with some spacers to allow the calbe to be centered in the >grommet and eliminate the rubbing? In my case, the rubbing was in the vertical direction. I was unable to solve this problem, so upon advice of a respected inspection authority, have added to my annual condition inspection to check this area carefully , and rotate the grommet ninety degrees. I have noted no grooves yet at 100 Hrs. is a tight fit over the cable. If you buy pieces that are as long as the exposed rudder cable going thru all of the grommets from front to back, you can rid yourself of the concern and the sound of the cable sawing on the snaplugs. This is easily retrofitted and the snaplugs are easily replaced, so it's no big deal either way. -GV e air pressure. An oil cooler line burst on a local -4, and the fella wound up in a plowed field, on his head. The hose did hold for about 100 hrs. No injuries, aircraft repairable. You can, however, build the hoses yourself from parts available thru the automotive parts suppliers, and then get them tested. Aeroquip also manufactures a line of hoses and fittings for these folks. We've been using those parts (purchased from Summit Racing) here for quite some time with good results. The hose ends do not have the aircraft style cutter nipple, and as a result don't tend to push out like that style does. By all means, use the soft vise jaws as reccomended, and follow the installation directions on the package. Pressure ratings seem to match the cutter style ends, which are more than we need by a factor of 10 or more. Hose price seems to run about $5/ft, and straight ends are around $5 ea. BTW, we only use firesleeve on the fuel lines, secured with a double wrap of .041 safety wire. Check six! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV4Brown(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 26, 1997
Subject: Re:Plane Takes off without Pilot!!
Gentlemen: Forgive the abuse of the cyberspace. I do not derive pleasure from other people's troubles, but this news article was too much to resist passing on. If the pilot is a member of the list, you have my sympathies. This is a reprint from the Associated Press URBANA, Ohio - A small aircraft took off without its pilot yesterday and flew for nearly two hours before crashing in a field. Paul A. Sirks of Dayton had landed the single engine plane at Urbana's Grimes Field airport because of mechanical problems, said police officer Mike Hughes. The plane's engine stalled on a taxiway and Skirks got out to restart it by hand-turning the propellor. Once the engine started, the empty plane taxied away without Sirks, nearly hitting another aircraft and a hanger before becoming airborne. The plane circled the area for about five minutes, headed north-east, and went down about 90 miles away, some 50 miles north-east of Columbus. No charges had been filed against Sirks. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dralle(at)matronics.com (Matt Dralle 510-606-1001)
Date: Nov 26, 1997
Subject: John Hovan Web Pages Online!
Listers- You may now access the John Hovan web pages from the Matronics web server. Everything has been moved over. Contact John at "hovan(at)flash.net" for more information or suggestions. The new URL for the Hovan Web pages is: http://www.matronics.com/rv-list/hovan Welcome back, John! Matt Dralle RV-List Admin. Matronics -- Matt G. Dralle | Matronics | P.O. Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 510-606-1001 Voice | 510-606-6281 FAX | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ W.W.W. | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Corbitt" <donc(at)analogia.com>
Subject: De-ice?
Date: Nov 26, 1997
[Warning - I don't know what I'm talking about. Don't even have PPL, first solo was last week. Not only that, but I'm a computer programmer :-] As long as I'm designing an airplane I'm never going to build (RV-6AQB), I thought I might as well make it all weather :-) I'm assuming that such a beast is going to be liquid cooled, which means a radiator. Is there some reason that you couldn't run the coolant through the leading edge of the wings, thus providing a really cheap anti-ice capability as well? I can think of potential disadvantages, but don't know enough to evaluate them: * Weight - depends on diameter and length of coolant tubing, but it seems that radiators have fairly skinny tubes. * Won't work when cold - perhaps when it is cold enough that ice is a problem, the coolant thermostat valve will remain closed. * Hot wing will disrupt airflow - would heating air at the wing reduce lift, especially on a hot day? This would not be good :-) * Heated wing might just change the temp of icing - perhaps icing will occur at a lower temperature, cold enough to counteract the wing heat * Not enough heat to melt ice on two large metal wings - I can imagine this working to defrost the leading edge, but perhaps ice would still form on other surfaces. Potential advantages of a turbocharged diesel with wing cooling: * No carb ice - diesels work on direct injection * Reduced wing icing problems * No shock cooling - liquid cooling maintains constant engine temp * Smoother aerodynamics - no big openings required for cooling air (although perhaps small openings would be needed) * Less overheating while waiting in line on the ground Is this a well known bad idea? Is someone already doing this? Or is it just that there are not very many liquid cooled airplanes? Thanks for your friendly, helpful suggestions :-) -- Don Corbitt, donc(at)analogia.com. -----Original Message----- From: Mike Wills <willsm(at)nosc.mil> Date: Wednesday, November 26, 1997 7:26 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: High Temps > > Nobody told you how far away that horizon is. Been hearing about new diesel >aircraft engines for years, always "just over the horizon", but never >getting to market. It will be great if it happens and if it lives up to >expectations, but I wouldnt hold my breath while waiting. > >Mike Wills >RV-4 (wings done!, saving pennies for fuse) >willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil > >> >>There is a possible fix for potential danger from the wet wing fuel cells >>just >>over the horizon. There is a project right now under way to market a V-4 >>TurboDiesel(200HP) . This engine runs on Jet-A, which is alot less volatile >>than Avgas or autofuel. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 27, 1997
From: Ronald Vandervort <rvanderv(at)linknet.kitsap.lib.wa.us>
Subject: Navaid Installation?
I know this has been discussed before, but I would like some sort of feedback from RV-6/A operators of the Navaid, if possible: i.e. Where did you install the servo and how has it worked out for you? Thank you, Ron Vandervort, RV-6Q, installing engine, instruments etc. Seattle area ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 27, 1997
From: Frank Smidler <smidler(at)dcwi.com>
Subject: Trimming inboard end of flap
Recently there was a discussion on the list about trimming the inboard end of the flap. I've just finished my RV-6 flaps and the fit up to the fuselage with very good results and thought I'd pass on what I learned. First, during the wing construction I rivited up the bottom skin of the flap with its ribs except for the inboard one which I only drilled. The spar was drilled to the ribs and the bottom skin with the hinge but only clecoed on. Make sure that the spar is tight against the ribs when you drill it the the bottom skin or later you could induce a twist into the assembly. Using I think Frank Justices method of installing and aligning the ailerons and flap I positioned the wings vertically with the nose down. The wing top skins were riveted on but the bottoms were still only clecoed. Following his proceedure I aligned and installed the aileron hinges and flap hinges with the aileron and bottom flap assembly in place (his proceedure uses the tooling holes for alignment and no wing profile). The top flap skin trailing end was aligned with the aileron trailing edge and a couple of alignment holes were drilled to locate it to the bottom flap assembly. The inboard linkage attachment peices were not yet installed. At this point I set the incompleted flaps aside and proceeded to finish the wings and build the fuselage. (Fast forward 2 years) After getting the fuselage on the gear and the wings installed I was now ready to complete the flaps. I drilled the top skin to the bottom assembly. With the top skin off I put the bottom flap assembly onto the wing. This allowed me to mark edge of the fuselage onto the bottom skin. THIS IS NOT FOR CUTTING, It is for locating the inboard flap linkage plate. Next, I used poster board to make a template that when set on top of the inboard two flap ribs would reach from the spar to the trailing edge of the inboard rib and would follow the fuselage contour. This is easy to do with siccors using trial and error. This was taped into place as if it were the top skin. Take the flap off of the wing and set it on a bench, position the top skin and cleco into place with the template still in place. A few clecos can actually be pushed through the template. Flip it over and trace the edge of the template onto the bottom side of the top skin. Remove the top skin, extend the trim line to the front and rear. Cut along the line. At approximately 1/2" from the trailing edge, angle the cut off to the inboard edge. This area will be final trimmed on the fuselage. After filing the edge, cleco the top flap skin on and reinstall onto the wing. Pivot it up and trim the last 1/2" with a rat tail and small striaght file. You should now have a perfect fitting top flap skin to fuselage intersection. Please remember that the bottom skin DOES NOT GET TRIMMED. With the flaps off the wing and the top skin off the inboard brackets can be made. The fuselage line on the bottom skin will be used to position the inboard linkage attachment plate. This plate should be at 1/8" away from the fuselage. I hope this is of some help. Frank Smidler smidler(at)dcwi.com RV-6, working on finishing. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Larry Bowen <larry(at)bowen.com>
Subject: Is the list sick?
Date: Nov 27, 1997
Email volume on the list seems to be down significantly since the infrastructure upgrade. Is it just my imagination, or the holidays, or ???? Larry larry(at)bowen.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: winterland(at)rkymtnhi.com
Date: Nov 27, 1997
Subject: RVation Bookstore catalogs
For all of you who have requested RVation Bookstore catalogs; they are now in the mail and you should be receiving them shortly. For those who have yet to ask, more are here and ready to mail. E-mail your postal address, and I will be glad to send one. Regarding our web site, It's almost done and should be up early next week. Look it up then at http://www.RV-Bookstore.com To anybody who has an RV related website: I would like to exchange web links with you. I'll link to you, if you link to me. I can supply a .jpg or .gif logo, or you can just put in a text link. Please write we at the following address winterland(at)rkymtnhi.com Thanks, Andy Gold RVation Bookstore Winterland Publications RV6-A N-5060 flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: SportAV8R(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 27, 1997
Subject: Re: Oh, the choices
> I have to take a shot at this one! Check out the width of the cockpit in a > six with two people side by side. Now add up the width of the RV4 or RV8. > You have a lot more room in the tandem aircraft For your shoulders, yes. But can you say "baggage?" Only if you're building a six or an eight. I can't realistically imagine sharing chart-holding and nav duties with a GIB, either. Side by side would be my preference for cockpit resource management. I suppose it all depends on what you want to do with these wonderful machines. For just plain ol' flyin' around, an ultralight would probably be more mission-capable (can't wait for the flack on that- maybe we could just let that statement slide on by in the interest of controlling archive-bloat!) Now, would someone please answer last night's very good question about battery cable routing and bat. box removability? It comes at the perfect for me, too. Bill Boyd RV-6A systems, plumbing, paint & fly next spring! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 27, 1997
From: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Navaid Installation?
HI Ron I have a Navaid in my RV-6 and I really like it, it works great tied into my Flybuddy GPS. I installed it pretty much to the drawing that Navaid sent with it for a RV-6. The only difference I did wa not not connect to the bottom of the copilots control stick because it makes to great of a angle for the push pull rod when moving the control stick forward and back. I run the Navaid push pull rod across to the bottom of the pilots control stick and it works great. Some guys are mounting the servo in the wing and also getting good results Ronald Vandervort wrote: > > > I know this has been discussed before, but I would like some sort of > feedback from RV-6/A operators of the Navaid, if possible: i.e. Where > did you install the servo and how has it worked out for you? > > Thank you, > > Ron Vandervort, RV-6Q, installing engine, instruments etc. > Seattle area > -- Jerry Springer RV-6 N906GS First flight July 14, 1989 :-) Hillsboro, OR jsflyrv(at)ix.netcom.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 27, 1997
From: Charlie Kuss <charliekuss(at)sprintmail.com>
Subject: Elevator mini-ribs
Hi, I just ordered my wing kit Monday. It looks like I'll have the empennage kit finished a month before the wing kit gets here. That means I'll have some extra time to improve/modify. I'm putting the stiffeners in my elevators. I was leafing through the 16 YEARS OF THE RVator yesterday. I noticed a suggestion about fabricating some mini-ribs for the elevators. I was wondering if anyone on the list (or someone you know) has installed the mini-ribs (or other mods) into their elevators. Are they worth the effort? What did you do (or would do different) to make sure the elevators came out straight? Any problems or regrets about installing them? Happy Thanksgiving! Charlie Kuss RV-8 elevators ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 27, 1997
From: Bill Benedict <billb(at)atheria.europa.com>
Subject: Re: RV-6a electri8 Flaps
Ken and Others, We are continuing to ship flap replacement motors to people on the list. One problem is that not everyone is prompt in returning their old motor. If you delay returning it when you get your replacement motor, then we are delayed in having the housing replaced and rebuilt, which delays getting it out to the next person. All in all, there is a steady flow and it is only a matter of time until everyone has their replacement. When we think everyone has been serviced, we will put a note on the list and in the RVator which should pick up those who were lost at some point. Keep in mind that there has not been an incident due to breakage of this part. So keep on flying and eventually (hopefully within one year) all of the old motors in the field will be replaced. For those not familiar with this discussion, please do not call Van's asking for clarification. This discussion is about the flap motor in the electric flap installation. It only involves the motors in the 6 and 6A and only involves those who drilled a mounting hole in the motor case perpendicular to the hole provided (as instructed in the assembly instructions). All motors shipped in the last 6 months are of the new style and do not require rework. Bill > > >Anyone know about the "fix---as in retrofit" for the RV6A >electric flap? > >Have had a request in for some months now but ain't >heard nothing. > > > >I asked the same question about a month ago. Several folks responded saying they'd received theirs, >I guess we must be way down on the list. > >Bill Benedict....any comment? > >Ken > >RV6A Flying Bill RV-4-180 flying. N894RV with over 400 hours behind a O-320, Over 1000 RV flying hours. These opinions are mine and do not necessarily represent the opinions or position of my employer. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 27, 1997
From: "les williams" <lesliebwilliams(at)classic.msn.com>
Subject: Is the list sick?
If this gets through, then I'd say it at least has the sniffles. I posted a reply two days ago and haven't seen it yet. Maybe others have posted and they haven't gotten through either. Waiting to see. Les Williams/RV-6AQ/Tacoma WA Email volume on the list seems to be down significantly since the infrastructure upgrade. Is it just my imagination, or the holidays, or ???? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 27, 1997
From: MoeJoe <moejoe03(at)erols.com>
Subject: Re: Is the list sick?
I sent a reply out to Matt's announcement that it was up, and I never saw my post either. I just finished drilling my HS 810 and 814 to the HS front spar, and it looks like the fuselage attach holes on the 810 will miss the min 2D edge distance by 1/32". I haven't drilled these holes yet, but if I draw a line between the holes on either side, then measure from the line to the edge, it'll be short. There is no leeway on the 810, so I can't drill them off center. Ken at Van's told me not to worry about it, but after hanging up with him I wondered if I had explained the situation correctly. Another builder who has done several RV-6's told me that edge distance isn't as important with bolts as it is with rivets. Anyone have any opinions on this? I'm also looking for new builders who might be interested in a small email list for all those little questions, or just to relate day to day building experiences. Email me if your interested. Moe Colontonio RV-8 Emp moejoe03(at)erols.com les williams wrote: > > > If this gets through, then I'd say it at least has the sniffles. I posted a > reply two days ago and haven't seen it yet. Maybe others have posted and they > haven't gotten through either. Waiting to see. > > Les Williams/RV-6AQ/Tacoma WA > > > Email volume on the list seems to be down significantly since the > infrastructure upgrade. Is it just my imagination, or the holidays, or ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 27, 1997
From: Charlie Kuss <charliekuss(at)sprintmail.com>
Subject: Free RV photos to good home
Hi all! Ed Anderson was kind enough to mail me his very nice engine bay photos. He has built an RV-6A with a Mazda 13B. It appears to be a first rate installation. I have scanned the photos (15 in all) and sent his photos back. Is anyone with an RV related web site willing to put these photos on their site? They come with 3 typewritten pages explaining the photos. They have all their shots and come with a free flea collar. :-) Charlie Kuss RV-8 making elevator stiffeners on Thanksgiving. I'm thankful I have an understanding girlfriend. Boca Raton, Florida ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HAWKBUD(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 27, 1997
Subject: Re: Battery Wires
the terminals need to be horizontal... the solenoids (relays) need to be veritcal. they can be mounted anywhere on the firewall. Suggest you buy tony Bingalis book from EAA "Firewall Forward" the Battery leads should be brought straight forward from the battery to the firewall. Be sure to use grommet material as you go throught the firewall. Just had mine inspected and approved for flight test ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 27, 1997
From: jim jewell <jjewell(at)okanagan.net>
Subject: Re: Hello? Is This Thing On??
510-606-1001) > >Hello Listers! > >Matronics is back online! >Matt Dralle >RV and Zenith List Admin... Mat: Aside from about three messages the day of your above edited message,I have had no Rv list email. Questions: - Am I alone in this situation?. - Did the Paranoid Club of North America (I'm a fully invested member) secretly have my name deleted?. - Are you swamped with smart assed emails like this one yet?. - how I get back on (without the "P.C.N.A."finding out)?. - Could, should, or would you email a message to the list for all the lost lonly souls ( I assume the "P.C.N.A" have us on a list of some sort ) reguarding what to do?. Good humor intended; Yuor efforts are appreciated. jjewell(at)okanagan.net> > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 27, 1997
From: jim jewell <jjewell(at)okanagan.net>
Subject: Hello? Is This Thing On??
510-606-1001) Hello Listers! Matronics is back online! The cutover to the dedicated Internet connection appears to be successful at this point. I have reenabled the RV-List and Zenith-List email lists as of 7:30pm 11/22 and will start forwarding all of the queued posts shortly. I will be keeping a close eye on the operation of everything for a few days and will post updates as necessary. Welcome back! Matt Dralle RV and Zenith List Admin... -- Matt G. Dralle | Matronics | P.O. Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 510-606-1001 Voice | 510-606-6281 FAX | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ W.W.W. | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "R.H.Mole -Richard Mole" <R.H.Mole(at)open.ac.uk>
Subject: Book by Bruce Carmichael
Date: Nov 28, 1997
Sport Aviation carried an article on CFD for the RV-6 in April 1997. On page 51, the article mentioned the availability of the book 'Personal Aircraft Drag Reduction' by Bruce Carmichael. I would very much like to see this book. Does anyone know where to get it and how much it is? EAA didn't seem to know anything about it. Has anyone read it and if so would they recommend it? Richard Mole R.H.Mole(at)open.ac.uk ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MAlexan533(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 28, 1997
Subject: Dimple or Machine Countersink on HS?
On my RV-4, I used machine countersinking on the H.Stabilizer. My RV-8 manual says it is preferable to use dimpling. I tend to want to stay with what I did before, the results were so good. What are you guys out there using? Regards, Von Alexander RV-8 #80544 MAlexan533(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 28, 1997
From: Thomas Barnes <skytop(at)starnetinc.com>
Subject: Re: Wing conduit installation
Brian Denk wrote: > > > Greetings friends, > > I just received some of the corrugated plastic conduit from Van's for > routing the tip and landing light wiring through my -8 wings. Does the > conduit need to be anchored (glued???) into each rib so it doesn't shift > around during flight? The holes are just large enough to allow the > tubing to fit through..but the variation in the outer diameter of the > tubing, due to the corrugations, cause the tubing to move around a bit. > Would chafing be a problem if not anchored into each rib? I've thought > of using thin wall PVC, but there's just something lacking in the > aesthetics department there! Heck, I used the stuff for my garden > irrigation system fer cryin out loud...:) > > Any thoughts? > > Brian Denk > -8 #379 > riveting ribs to spars > > ______________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > I had the same concern when I did mine. I put a bit of pro-seal on some of the easy to reach rib pass-throughs. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: KBoatri144(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 28, 1997
Subject: Is the list working?
I've only gotten 5 or 6 pieces of mail from the list in a week. Is it me or is it the list? Somebody e-mail me direct. Kyle Boatright Kboatri144(at)AOL.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dralle(at)matronics.com (Matt Dralle 510-606-1001)
Date: Nov 28, 1997
Subject: List Problems...
Hi Everyone, Yes, there have been a few 'glitches' with the new connection! Please bare with me as I try to get this resolved. The primary problem has been trying to keep the connection up and working reliably. I have made a couple of significant changes that just might make things run smoother... I'm sure sorry this has been such a pain, everyone. It says right here in the manual that it was suppose to go very smoothly! Matt Dralle RV and Zenith List Admin. -- Matt G. Dralle | Matronics | P.O. Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 510-606-1001 Voice | 510-606-6281 FAX | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ W.W.W. | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 28, 1997
From: "Anthony Self" <CHEVY_TRUCK(at)classic.msn.com>
Subject: Grass runways???
I have a piece of land that is 735 ft. by 735 ft. This will yield a grass strip of anywhere from 700 ft. to over 1000 ft. on the diagonal. I haven't started an RV yet, but will soon. The thing I would like to know, is of you that are flying a RV6 or 6A, how do they handle on a grass strip? I was thinking I would probably build the 6A, but if there is a very distinct advantage to the 6 and grass strips, maybe I will change my mind. I don't care about all the macho taildragger hype, although, I admit they do have a nice stance. I want honest opinions about the two versions of aircraft and how they handle grass strips? I'm not concerned with image or traditions or anything like that, just performance. Also, to further explain my reasons for advice: I have never flown a taildragger or landed on a grass strip, as I am still in flight school and only have had Cessna/airport time. I would especially like to hear from you guys who have your own strip at home, as I plan to do. Thanks for the advice. Anthony K. Self CHEVY_TRUCK(at)MSN.COM ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jim Sears <sears(at)searnet.com>
Subject: Re: List Problems...
Date: Nov 28, 1997
It says right here in the manual that it was suppose to go very smoothly! Boy, where have I seen that before! Good luck with your work. I don't envy you one bit. Jim Sears RV-6A #22220 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rbz1(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 28, 1997
Subject: Rudder Hinge Dimensions
Is there any info on the dimensions to set the rudder hinge rod ends? Due to the different VS hinge lengths I would assume they vary also. Or do you just line them up and try them until they work? Rich Zeidman RV6A S/N 25224 finishing up empinage kit- Waiting for wing kit ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JHeadric(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 28, 1997
Subject: Re: Heater in 6A
I want to ask anybody if they have any suggestions for getting some decent cabin heat into a 6A. I used Van';s heat muff and firewall valve, but very little heat gets into the cabin. It is mounted crossways on the crossover exhaust. Wouldn';t fit anywhere else on the exhaust pipes. Too many curves. Help! Jim ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 29, 1997
From: Samuel Steele <steele(at)loyno.edu>
Subject: Hello!
Dear RV'ers! I am the proud owner-builder of an RV-4 and want to be included on your mailing list. MY thanks! Sam Steele e-mail: steele(at)beta.loyno.edu Physics Dept. Machinist Loyola Univ. N.O. (504) 865-3646 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: cecilth(at)juno.com
Subject: Re: Grass runways???
Date: Nov 29, 1997
Grass Strip? I don't have experience flying the two off grass strips, but Van lives on his grass strip and both are flown regularly from there. When the list gets up again, Scot McDaniels would have the experience to inform you with. He works there and has done that. Cecil ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 28, 1997
From: lottmc(at)datastar.net (Michael C. Lott)
Subject: Re: Grass runways???
Hi Anthony, My -4 handles grass just fine. The 1000 feet would really be pushing it unless your had a straight shot with no obstacles, no tail wind, and dry grass. Have fun. Michael I'm still trying to get consistent with 500 feet of pavement. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 28, 1997
From: Tom Martin <fairlea(at)execulink.com>
Subject: Re: Grass runways???
> >I have a piece of land that is 735 ft. by 735 ft. This will yield a grass >strip of anywhere from 700 ft. to over 1000 ft. on the diagonal. I think that you should buy the farm next door, Under optimum conditions this might work but not every time, Sorry to burst your bubble but 1200 to 1500 should be considered minimum. 292 hours in an RV4 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 28, 1997
From: Craig Hiers <craig-RV4(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: elevator trim cable
Listers When I mounted and balanced the elevator on my -4, the elevator moved up and down very smooth, and the balance was right on the money. When the trim cable was added it added a lot of drag to the elevator and it would not return to it's neutral position on it's own. Is this normal? I'm thinking now I should have added electric trim. Craig Hiers RV-4 N143CH ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 30, 1997
From: Randy Lervold <RLervold(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: What sort of documentation?
Just starting an RV-8 kit. I know a "builder's log" and accompanying photos will be required for certification. Can anyone fill me in on exactly what is required? After a quick search of the FAA and EAA web sites I can't find anything. Randy Lervold RV-8 emp part done, wings on order Vancouver, WA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: -8 wingwalk reinforcements
Date: Nov 30, 1997
g'day folks, The .025 sheet that is used to reinforce the wing walk area...is it supposed to be cut from one of the 10"x48" sheets of Alclad? The plans call for a piece that is 9"x26", I think. I don't want to cut into something that I'll need later. I noticed there is no specific part numer called out here..so, I guess it has to be cut from stock material. Brian Denk fitting the wing skins ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GHLX34A(at)PRODIGY.COM (MR GEORGE T KILISHEK)
Date: Nov 29, 1997
Subject: True Love
My wife doesn't like to fly. She is inventive to the point of genius at finding excuses not to climb into anything smaller than a 747. She sees no beauty or romance in airplanes. This weekend she put on her oldest clothes and cheerfully bucked rivets, cleaned tools, mixed "black death" and other wise partnered on rivetting a beautifully crafted fuel tank. We've been married for 32 years, and I've sometimes wondered if this marriage would last. I now think that it will. George Kilishek #80006 fuel tanks ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Installing flaps
From: tcraig-stearman(at)juno.com (John T. Craig-Stearman)
Date: Nov 29, 1997
RV-4 builders, While installing my flaps on the airplane I ran into a problem. The aluminum plate on the inboard end of each flap scrapes the side of the fuselage when traveling to the up position. I have measured everything I can think of, flap width, aileron to flap gap, etc., and I can't find any deviation from the plans dimensions. Has anyone else run into this problem? If so, how did you correct it? Thanks, Tom Craig-Stearman tcraig-stearman(at)juno.com RV-4 complete airframe now! Engine next. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 29, 1997
From: "Scott A. Jordan" <SAJ_SLJ(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: Filling fiberglass seams
OK , The seams on my fiberglass tips are not as nice as I had hoped and some filling will be required, especially the rudder bottom. My composit experience is with fiberglass & bondo on cars. What is the best method of filling the gap between the fiberglass & metal? A thin strip of light weight fiberglass? Bondo? Micro baloons (how are they used, mixed with epoxy resin?)? Some other method? TIA Fly Safe Scott A. Jordan -8 #331 N733JJ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 29, 1997
From: Scott Johnson <rvgasj(at)popmail.mcs.net>
Subject: I made the decision, I ordered the second airplane kit ...
Suffering severe withdrawls from building airplanes, I surveyed the market for another airplane kit. After staring at the thunder mustang, tigress, and lancair, I came to the same conculusion I came to 2 years ago. You can't beat the value VAN gives with his airplane kits. Therefore, I placed my order for the RV8A. I guess that numbers me amongst the elite repeat RV-offenders group ( after all, how could I pass up VANS discount for repeat builders ?) . I can't wait to start riveting again ... Scott Johnson rvgasj(at)mcs.com RV6A 70 HRS TT 345RV ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 28, 1997
From: jelford(at)TRANSPORT.COM (Jon Elford)
Subject: Grass Strips
I live 5 miles from Van's home/prototype shop which is on of all things, a well maintained grass strip. I have flown out of the strip in the prototype RV 6A and was nothing but impressed by the grass field capabilities. The field is in excellent shape and relatively smooth, but grass nonetheless. I, too, have not decided between a 6 or a 6A, but am building the empennage for one of them. You don't have to decide until the fuselage.... I recently finished my private pilot as well and have flown only Cessnas other than my demo flight in the 6A. I cannot wait to rip around in my own RV in a few years. It seems like forever, but as they say at Van's; "You won't finish an RV unless you start one..." Jon Elford - Riveting skins on horiz. stab. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Woodsboat(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 29, 1997
Subject: Re: Grass runways???
Anthony, I have a 1900' grass strip in WV, that I fly my 160 hp. RV-4 from. I use about 400' on take off and approx. 900' to 1200' on landing. I have made landings that have used 1700' of the field,due to 10 knot tail wind and trees that make it hard to land from the other direction. I have been flying final at 65 mph. and touching down at 60 mph. with full flaps. I don't want to dampen your thoughts or dreams,but I hope that purchasing your neighbor's property is a possibilty. To operate from my 1900' requires you to be where you belong and slowed to touchdown speed. On the positive side if you must go around the RV climbs out like a homesick angel. Good luck on whatever you decide. Pat Carr Backyard Bullet, 1997,Oshkosh Kitbuilt Champion ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 30, 1997
From: Randy Lervold <RLervold(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: Primer cleanup
I'm starting into my RV-8 kit and this is my first post to the RV List. I have however been "lurking" for some time now gleaning all sorts of valuable information. Based on what I've read here I made the decision to go the Sherwin Williams industrial wash primer route. So I bought some and then bought a small "detail" gun from Sears. Here come the questions; 1) What is the best solvent to use for cleanup? I've tried acetone and it seems to congeal the remaing primer mix... yikes! 2) Any hints/techniques for making the setup and cleanup routine easier and faster? 3) Geez, if I follow Van's instructions I'm going to be priming about 300 small batches. Has anyone just gone ahead and deburred the edges and primed a whole kit's worth of parts? Fledgling RV-8 builder, Randy Lervold starting on emp kit Vancouver, WA ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 29, 1997
From: Marc DeGirolamo <mdee(at)dlcwest.com>
Subject: Re: installation of rudder cables to pedals
> >After connecting the cables to the pedals I noticed that it is not a straight >shot for the cable from the last grommet to the connection on the pedal. The >cable angles in toward the pedal. This causes the cable to rub against the >side of the grommet. >I am thinking that eventually this will wear thru. Any advice? Can I use a >longer bolt with some spacers to allow the calbe to be centered in the >grommet and eliminate the rubbing? > >I am not quite at this point yet but have looked at the problem you mention. IMHO it seems to me that there isn't much movement,2-3in, so it would take a long time to wear through the gromets. If it did start to wear you could rotate the grommet a little. It would not be a problem to replace the grommet once it became unusable. The longer bolt may chaff against the fuse which would be worse than the original problem. > > > Marc DeGirolamo RV-4 Saskatoon,SK. Canada ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bruce & Paulette Smith" <bpsmith(at)teleport.com>
Subject: engine options, etc.
Date: Nov 29, 1997
I'm new to this site, and am standing at the edge of the abyss, pondering the task of building an RV-8. One friend who quit after building a tail says he has a new found respect for anyone who builds his own airplane. Particularly I'm very interested in the Harmon Rocket. So where can I get info on a Harmon Rocket? Is it simply (right!) an RV with a bigger engine, or are there significant other mods involved? Also, has anyone out there looked at the new DynaCam engine for installation in an RV? If you don't know about it, check out DynaCam.com. To the person who wants to build an RV and operate out of a 700 foot grass strip, I can only say I hope you're a better pilot than I. To fly safe, all the time, means leaving yourself an out - or several - to handle varying situations which will sneak up and bite eventually. Grass is very forgiving, especially to a novice pilot. But 700 feet leaves you no options for aborts, go arounds, wind gusts, and a zillion other variables that you must allow for to be consistently safe. My 2 cents. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 28, 1997
From: scott <acepilot(at)mwt.net>
Subject: Re: Grass runways???
Anthony Self wrote: > > > I have a piece of land that is 735 ft. by 735 ft. This will yield a grass > strip of anywhere from 700 ft. to over 1000 ft. on the diagonal. I haven't > started an RV yet, but will soon. The thing I would like to know, is of you > that are flying a RV6 or 6A, how do they handle on a grass strip? I was > thinking I would probably build the 6A, but if there is a very distinct > advantage to the 6 and grass strips, maybe I will change my mind. I don't care > about all the macho taildragger hype, although, I admit they do have a nice > stance. I want honest opinions about the two versions of aircraft and how they > handle grass strips? I'm not concerned with image or traditions or anything > like that, just performance. Also, to further explain my reasons for advice: I > have never flown a taildragger or landed on a grass strip, as I am still in > flight school and only have had Cessna/airport time. I would especially like > to hear from you guys who have your own strip at home, as I plan to do. > Thanks for the advice. > > Anthony K. Self > CHEVY_TRUCK(at)MSN.COM > > You mean they make runways out of something other than grass? Where have I been?? Scott -- Gotta Fly or Gonna Die ! --Ask me about my Aeronca Super Chief-- amended 8-29-97: Now after feeling the "Need for Speed", building an RV-4! No, the Super Chief is NOT for sale :) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Lousmith(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 28, 1997
Subject: Re: Grass runways???
<< I have a piece of land that is 735 ft. by 735 ft. This will yield a grass strip of anywhere from 700 ft. to over 1000 ft. on the diagonal. I haven't started an RV yet, but will soon. The thing I would like to know, is of you that are flying a RV6 or 6A, how do they handle on a grass strip? I was thinking I would probably build the 6A, but if there is a very distinct advantage to the 6 and grass strips, maybe I will change my mind. I don't care about all the macho taildragger hype, although, I admit they do have a nice stance. I want honest opinions about the two versions of aircraft and how they handle grass strips? I'm not concerned with image or traditions or anything like that, just performance. Also, to further explain my reasons for advice: I have never flown a taildragger or landed on a grass strip, as I am still in flight school and only have had Cessna/airport time. I would especially like to hear from you guys who have your own strip at home, as I plan to do. Thanks for the advice. Anthony K. Self CHEVY_TRUCK(at)MSN.COM >> Anthony, I have a strip in my back yard, but it is 2600' long. I had an RV-4 and a friend had his RV-6A based here. Both were 150 hp versions and they both performed great off of the grass strip. I have landed my RV-4 on a 700' ultralight field. Elevation was 200' MSL. I only used about 2/3 of the runway. You should be proficient at your short-field landings and not have any obstacles at either end. Good luck and you won't go wrong with either choice. Regards, Louis Smith lousmith(at)aol.com RV-4 N102LS sold RV-8 N801RV waiting on finish kit ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Loren D. Jones" <Loren(at)LorenJones.com>
Subject: Re: Grass runways???
Date: Nov 29, 1997
Typically, taildraggers fair a bit better on grass than trikes, but if you keep it mowed and the field is reasonably smooth you won't have a problem with a nosewheel. You'll find grass much more forgiving in either configuration and, after living on grass for awhile, may really prefer it to the hard stuff! Loren RV-wanna-be -----Original Message----- From: Anthony Self <CHEVY_TRUCK(at)classic.msn.com> Date: Friday, November 28, 1997 3:04 PM Subject: RV-List: Grass runways??? > >I have a piece of land that is 735 ft. by 735 ft. This will yield a grass >strip of anywhere from 700 ft. to over 1000 ft. on the diagonal. I haven't >started an RV yet, but will soon. The thing I would like to know, is of you >that are flying a RV6 or 6A, how do they handle on a grass strip? I was >thinking I would probably build the 6A, but if there is a very distinct >advantage to the 6 and grass strips, maybe I will change my mind. I don't care >about all the macho taildragger hype, although, I admit they do have a nice >stance. I want honest opinions about the two versions of aircraft and how they >handle grass strips? I'm not concerned with image or traditions or anything >like that, just performance. Also, to further explain my reasons for advice: I >have never flown a taildragger or landed on a grass strip, as I am still in >flight school and only have had Cessna/airport time. I would especially like >to hear from you guys who have your own strip at home, as I plan to do. >Thanks for the advice. > >Anthony K. Self >CHEVY_TRUCK(at)MSN.COM > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: jpl(at)showpg.mn.org (Joe Larson)
Subject: Re: Grass runways???
Date: Nov 29, 1997
> I have a piece of land that is 735 ft. by 735 ft. This will yield a grass > strip of anywhere from 700 ft. to over 1000 ft. on the diagonal. I haven't > started an RV yet, but will soon. The thing I would like to know, is of you > that are flying a RV6 or 6A, how do they handle on a grass strip? I was > thinking I would probably build the 6A, but if there is a very distinct > advantage to the 6 and grass strips, maybe I will change my mind. I don't care > about all the macho taildragger hype, although, I admit they do have a nice > stance. I want honest opinions about the two versions of aircraft and how they > handle grass strips? I'm not concerned with image or traditions or anything > like that, just performance. Also, to further explain my reasons for advice: I > have never flown a taildragger or landed on a grass strip, as I am still in > flight school and only have had Cessna/airport time. I would especially like > to hear from you guys who have your own strip at home, as I plan to do. > Thanks for the advice. Anthony -- Before you even *think* about this, you *must* call Van's and tell them what you're considering. 1000 foot airstrip? Yikes! Yes, I know. The book says it'll take off in 600 feet. Talk to Van's. But if you look around at all the airports in your area, you'll find the shortest have runways no less than about 2300 feet. Any chance you can buy more land or work out a deal with a neighbor to make the runway longer? As for -6 vs. -6A -- I'm building a -6A, but I'll operate mostly off paved runways, and the grass strips I use are more than twice as long as your 1000 feet. If I were going to do most of my flying off grass, I'd go with a taildragger. I've watched airplanes at grass strips, and I would be very careful with a tricycle gear airplane. The runway itself is usually okay, but when you taxi around, you tend to run into bumps and such, and that prop comes *awfully* close to the grass. At least one of the reasons grass strip pilots prefer taildraggers is due to the extra prop clearance you get. I enjoy grass strips in Cessna 152s & 172s, but you do need to be careful. -Joe ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Malott" <drmalott(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Grass runways???
Date: Nov 30, 1997
>From owner-rv-list(at)roxy.matronics.com Fri Nov 28 13:07:02 1997 >Received: from roxy.matronics.com [207.171.206.243] > by mole with esmtp (Exim 1.73 #2) >Received: (from daemon@localhost) (PST) >Errors-To: owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com >Posted-Date: Fri, 28 Nov 1997 12:50:42 -0800 (PST) >Received-Date: Fri, 28 Nov 1997 12:50:42 -0800 (PST) >Date: Fri, 28 Nov 97 20:44:31 UT >From: "Anthony Self" <CHEVY_TRUCK(at)classic.msn.com> >Message-Id: >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV-List: Grass runways??? >Sender: owner-rv-list(at)matronics.com >Precedence: bulk >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > > >I have a piece of land that is 735 ft. by 735 ft. This will yield a grass >strip of anywhere from 700 ft. to over 1000 ft. on the diagonal. I haven't >started an RV yet, but will soon. The thing I would like to know, is of you >that are flying a RV6 or 6A, how do they handle on a grass strip? I was >thinking I would probably build the 6A, but if there is a very distinct >advantage to the 6 and grass strips, maybe I will change my mind. I don't care >about all the macho taildragger hype, although, I admit they do have a nice >stance. I want honest opinions about the two versions of aircraft and how they >handle grass strips? I'm not concerned with image or traditions or anything >like that, just performance. Also, to further explain my reasons for advice: I >have never flown a taildragger or landed on a grass strip, as I am still in >flight school and only have had Cessna/airport time. I would especially like >to hear from you guys who have your own strip at home, as I plan to do. >Thanks for the advice. > >Anthony K. Self >CHEVY_TRUCK(at)MSN.COM > >Anthony I have a 1800 ft grass strip with a couple of dips and small knolls. For ten years I flew a 177B in and out of this strip. I built a RV6 and fly it off this same strip but it is not as easy to handle as the Cardinal. On take off the dip in the strip will sometimes throw you off before you are ready to fly and likewise on landing you need to pick your spot were you will touch down. A smooth,flat,reasonable length grass strip is no harder to land or take off on than a paved strip. You are talking about a 1000 ft strip with hopefully clear approaches. The next time you go flying at the airport find out were the 1000 ft mark is and try and operate in that length. My advice is build the plane of your choice, but test fly it from a airport and contine to fly from the airport until you are confindent in your abilities, then do some work at grass strips of the same length as the airport. After that start finding other strips that are shorter and narrower. Grass strips are fun but !!! Also if you want flight insurance on your aircraft check with your insurance Co. about grass strips. Happy flying and building. David Malott > > > > ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: TBRV(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: Grass runways???
A 1000ft. runway is pretty short. Better have your flying skills sharp. No room for boo-boos. Every landing will be an exercise of discipline. I can't be too objective about whether to build a taildragger or not since all my favorite airplanes have tailwheels. Flying a taildragger requires a little more training and constant attention when the wheels are rolling, but I enjoy the experience so much more than when I fly trigear planes. I don't have an RV yet, but I sure enjoy flying a J-3 Cub from a grass strip. There are several 172's for rent locally, but I usually drive 30 miles for the tailwheel and grass experience. Good luck. TBRV RV-8 builder wannabe ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 30, 1997
From: lottmc(at)datastar.net (Michael C. Lott)
Subject: Re: Heater in 6A
Jim, My -4 has the crossovers with the heat muff on the "passenger" side pipe, lower end before the piece that exits the lower cowling. It just did squeeze in there, but it will blow you out with good hot air. It is the one with two outlets. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 30, 1997
From: lottmc(at)datastar.net (Michael C. Lott)
Subject: Re: elevator trim cable
Craig, This is the way my -4 is, and I have found no ill affects caused by this. I have only done flutter testing to 200 so far, so maybe I haven't pushed it far enough to cause a problem, yet. Spinning was uneventful, just fast. I'll be adding 200 pounds to the back seat tomorrow to check the flying characteristics before I add a passenger. I figured I can carry a 200 pound passenger all the way to dry tanks and not push the aft cg limit too far. The gross will be closer to 1600 lbs, though. 33 hours, so far. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: elevator trim cable
From: smcdaniels(at)juno.com (SCOTT R MCDANIELS)
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Craig, As long as you follow the procedures in the manual for balancing you will be fine. The balancing is to prevent flutter of the mass of the elevator. The friction of the cable doesn't seem to have any ill effects (as proven by many hundreds of RV's flying with manual trim). Once everything is connected to the stick you wont be able to feel the cable stiffness. Scott McDaniels N64SD / RV-6A 560+ Hrs. These ideas and opinions are my own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of my employer. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: What sort of documentation?
From: smcdaniels(at)juno.com (SCOTT R MCDANIELS)
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Check with the local DAR or FAA airworthiness inspector that you will use for your certification to be sure you know what THEY want. It some times varies from one to another. Scott McDaniels N64SD / RV-6A 560+ Hrs. These ideas and opinions are my own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of my employer. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
From: Jim Cimino <jcimino(at)epix.net>
Subject: Re: -8 wingwalk reinforcements
Brian, If I remember correctly, they are cut from the .025X10X48 pieces. I don't know what the excess is used for though. I finished my wings and still have them. > >g'day folks, > >The .025 sheet that is used to reinforce the wing walk area...is it >supposed to be cut from one of the 10"x48" sheets of Alclad? The plans >call for a piece that is 9"x26", I think. I don't want to cut into >something that I'll need later. I noticed there is no specific part >numer called out here..so, I guess it has to be cut from stock material. > >Brian Denk >fitting the wing skins > >______________________________________________________ >Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > > > > > Jim Cimino RV-8 sn 80039 http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/5771 (717)842-4057 N.E. Pennsylvania ________________________________________________________________________________
From: jsflyrv(at)ix.netcom.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: Grass runways???
On 11/29/97 11:06:36 you wrote: > > >Grass Strip? I don't have experience flying the two off grass strips, >but Van lives on his grass strip and both are flown regularly from there. > When the list gets up again, Scot McDaniels would have the experience to >inform you with. He works there and has done that. > >Cecil > > Actually grass strips are easier to land on than pavement. And if it is a smooth grass strip it is much easier on tires. My Dad and I had a 1000ft. grass strip on his land that we used for years. I would not want to have any shorter for safety reasons. Yes a RV- will get in and out shorter than that, but you would have to do it perfect every time and in real life that is not going to happen. When Van first started out he had a 600ft grass strip on his folks farm that he used to fly his RV-3 in and out of but it was clear and flat on both ends. I landed there once in about 1972 in another homebuilt I had,(Geez, writing that makes me sound old)it was doable but to short for comfort. I would respectfully say that if the orignal poster wants to use his 700ft for a airstrip he should probably build another type of airplane IMHO Jerry Springer ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: "Robert G. Miller, Jr." <rgmiller(at)sprintmail.com>
Subject: angle drill
I have a broken THOR angle drill. Any suggestions for repairs or parts? Robert Miller ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: Heater in 6A
<< Anybody have any suggestions for getting some decent cabin heat into a 6A? >> Place pickup 2" diameter flanges as low as possible on the rear baffles so the air is already slightly warmed before it gets to the muff. Buy some long 1/4" OD stainless steel springs from McMaster-Carr and wrap them helically around the pipe in the area to be covered by the muff. Make sure that not too much air is going thru the muffs too fast. They have to have a smaller outlet than inlet (fewer holes). The Rick Robbins muffs have eccentric end caps and can be fit low on the pipes just fine so you can use one on each side of the 6. Put boots on the aileron push/pull tubes to reduce the blast up thru the stick area. Upholster the cabin to give it some R-value. -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BrownTool(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: angle drill
<< I have a broken THOR angle drill. Any suggestions for repairs or parts? >> If you are in or near a large town, your best bet is a pneumatic tool repair shop, they do not have to be dedicated to aircraft tools to repair your angle drill. Look in your yellow pages under pneumatic tools and/or air tools and keep calling till you find a shop that specializes in repair. If you are not in a large enough town to have a pneumatic tool repair shop, you can handle the repair through the mail with any one of several companies that specialize in pneumatic tool repair. My company, Brown Aviation Tool Supply Co., offers repair services with a turn-around time of 2-3 weeks after receiving the tool in our shop, provided parts are readily available. If you will call with your location, I might be able to provide you with the name of a repair shop in your area. While I am here, if anyone out there does not have a copy of our free catalog of sheetmetal tools, please call toll free 1-800-587-3883, or e-mail us at : BrownTool(at)aol.com and we will be happy to rush a copy to you. With the holidays coming, be sure and tell your family and friends you want tools under your tree !!! With Best Regards, Michael Brown Brown Aviation Tool Supply Co. Bethany, OK 73008 1-800-587-3883 405-495-4991 BrownTool(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Primer cleanup
Date: Dec 01, 1997
> >I'm starting into my RV-8 kit and this is my first post to the RV List. I >have however been "lurking" for some time now gleaning all sorts of >valuable information. Based on what I've read here I made the decision to >go the Sherwin Williams industrial wash primer route. So I bought some and >then bought a small "detail" gun from Sears. Here come the questions; > >1) What is the best solvent to use for cleanup? I've tried acetone and it >seems to congeal the remaing primer mix... yikes! > >2) Any hints/techniques for making the setup and cleanup routine easier and >faster? > >3) Geez, if I follow Van's instructions I'm going to be priming about 300 >small batches. Has anyone just gone ahead and deburred the edges and primed >a whole kit's worth of parts? > >Fledgling RV-8 builder, > >Randy Lervold >starting on emp kit >Vancouver, WA > Randy, Since I'm using Variprime..which just LOVES Acetone for cleanup..can't help ya much with the Sherwin Williams stuff. As for priming ahead...by all means do so! I haven't found an instance where it caused any heartache whatsoever when the parts were needed later on. Don't worry about drilling through primed pre-punch holes..the rivet shank effectively seals and protects in this area. When I received the tailkit..I just went into a flange straightening/hole deburring/surface scuffing/edge smoothing/fluting mode and got most of the arduous "grunt work" done ahead, so I could enjoy actually putting stuff together! Then, mixed up a batch of Variprime..and sprayed the skeleton components. The skin I saved for a later time..after drilling to the skeleton and dimpling. I figured I would scratch off a lot of primer just in the handling during drilling. If I recall, It took only three priming sessions to get the entire interior of the all the tail kit components coated. Once you've gone through it once..you'll find the quickest way to go about doing it..then it's not so bad next time. Cleanup for me now is no more than 5 minutes of work. Make Van's instructions work for YOUR situation...plan ahead and make it easy on yourself. It can be done! Oh, one more thing..the elevator horns...corrosion can set in very quickly, especially around the weldments. So, I primered them..with several coats very early on. I could see some oxidation already starting to set in right out of the box. I buffed out the oxidation of course, and scothbrite scuffed the entire surface for better "bite" of the primer. Enjoy!! Brian Denk Albuquerque, NM -8 #379 fitting wing skins ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
From: Tom Martin <fairlea(at)execulink.com>
Subject: Re: Installing flaps
>RV-4 builders, >While installing my flaps on the airplane I ran into a problem. The >aluminum plate on the inboard end of each flap scrapes the side of the >fuselage when traveling to the up position. This is apparently a common problem, especially it seems with the left wing? I had the problem on my 4 and it took a little work to make it fit. It was close enough that if I filed the top of the flap bracket a little and pushed the fuse in a little there it worked. If you looked closely when the flaps are down you could see where the fuse was curved in a little but it never was a problem. As well that area on the fuse calls for universal headed rivets, I changed to flush rivets and that helped as well On my current project I am not finishing the end of the flaps until I trial fit the wings to the fuse, then I will be sure of the right fit Tom Martin RV4 sold HR on the gear ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: I made the decision, I ordered the second airplane
kit ...
Date: Dec 01, 1997
>Suffering severe withdrawls from building airplanes, I surveyed the market >for another airplane kit. After staring at the thunder mustang, tigress, >and lancair, I came to the same conculusion I came to 2 years ago. You >can't beat the value VAN gives with his airplane kits. Therefore, I placed >my order for the RV8A. I guess that numbers me amongst the elite repeat >RV-offenders group ( after all, how could I pass up VANS discount for >repeat builders ?) . I can't wait to start riveting again ... > >Scott Johnson >rvgasj(at)mcs.com > >RV6A 70 HRS TT 345RV > Hah!! You're SICK, SICK I tell you!! But, what a sweet affliction, eh? Even after the short time with my -8 kit...I, too become rather testy when I don't get to bang away on some rivets every day. A cup of AN426's with breakfast starts the day off right... Brian Denk skinning the wings. ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
From: Craig Hiers <craig-RV4(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Installing flaps
John T. Craig-Stearman wrote: > > RV-4 builders, > While installing my flaps on the airplane I ran into a problem. The > aluminum plate on the inboard end of each flap scrapes the side of the > fuselage when traveling to the up position. I have measured everything I > can think of, flap width, aileron to flap gap, etc., and I can't find any > deviation from the plans dimensions. Has anyone else run into this > problem? If so, how did you correct it? > Thanks, > Tom Craig-Stearman > tcraig-stearman(at)juno.com > RV-4 complete airframe now! Engine next. > Tom I had the same problem, I call vans they said this is a common problem and to grind the plate at the top. It was a pain but it worked. The plans called for round head rivets, I changed mine to counter-sunk where the interference was. Craig Hiers ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: Heater in 6A
From: wstucklen1(at)juno.com (Frederic W Stucklen)
Jim, I used the same heat muff and firewall valve, and have had no problems with heat. I did put the muff on the exhaust pipe on the right side instead of the crossover (I have Carb heat box on the crossover). I also wrapped a screen door spring (stretched out) around the exhaust pipe inside the muff to increase the pipe surface area. Cabin heat is a direct function of how well you seal your canopy, and all other cabin air sources. You need to have the aileron tube fuselage holes sealed with a flexable boot, as well as the spare area sealed so that they are air tight, but don't allow water to collect. I have a tiltup canopy that I've spent a lot of time being sure that it is not allowing a suction of cabin air. (Canopy leaks typically create a cockpit suction, pulling in cold air from every other leakage area. Usually this is from the spare box area, causing the seat area, spare box, and baggage compartment floor to be cold and drafty....) With the other air leaks sealed, any canopy leaks tend to suck the hot air in from the heat source. I do have a pattern for the aileron boot if you need it. Email me for an address.. Fred Stucklen RV-6A N925RV (Working on 2'd RV-6A - Chevy Powered!) wstucklen1(at)juno.com > >I want to ask anybody if they have any suggestions for getting some >decent >cabin heat into a 6A. I used Van';s heat muff and firewall valve, but >very >little heat gets into the cabin. It is mounted crossways on the >crossover >exhaust. Wouldn';t fit anywhere else on the exhaust pipes. Too many >curves. > Help! Jim > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: What sort of documentation?
From: bob.char.reeves(at)juno.com (Robert L Reeves)
Have a some of the photos showing you with your project. Also keep receipts of everything you buy for it. Along with your builders log it will satisfy most inspectors. Good luck and enjoy! Bob Reeves Building Bearhawk, Flying RV-4 Hidden River Airport, Sarasota, Florida ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
From: Dr John Cocker <jcocker(at)medhumor.com>
Subject: Re: Heater in 6A
Jim, I have two heat muffs on straight parts of the exhaust and they are working well enough. I did not make any special efforts to make the cabin airtight. I have been flying with temperatures down to freezing, and the cabin is warm -not hot. The jet of freezing air coimg up by the control column and hitting in the crutch area is invigourating, to say the least. The problem is, the engine does not really get warm until several minutes into the flight, and by this time I am frozen. I have decided on another route. Instead of trying to get the whole cabin warm, it should be more efficient to warm me, so I have bought a 12v electrical heated jacket from a motorbike store. I have not tried it yet. It comes with a 10 amp fuse, and is a well made, insulated jacket. I will let you know how it works when I have tried it. John ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
From: lottmc(at)datastar.net (Michael C. Lott)
Subject: faa
I am going through the process of finding the correct prop for my plane. Am I suppose to notify the faa everytime I try a different prop, other than the one the inspector signed off? I know a lot of guys try different props all the time and never notify the faa. I believe Jim Ayers said he has to get a new air worthiness certificate when he tests a new prop. I am mostly concerned with insurance coverage should anything happen while I have a prop other than the one signed off by the inspector on my plane, even if the prop has nothing to do with any incident that may occur. Does anyone have experience or knowledge in this area? Thanks. Michael ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Bum flyer <Bumflyer(at)aol.com>
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: Heater in 6A
Me too on the Rick Robbins Heat muff. They work. D Walsh ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Bum flyer <Bumflyer(at)aol.com>
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: What sort of documentation?
In a message dated 12/1/97 1:11:32 AM, you wrote: >an anyone fill me in on exactly what > >is required? After a quick search of the FAA and EAA web sites I can't find > >anything. Can't remember the source, but the requirement is for enough evidence to convince the inspector that you did indeed build the plane. You will not find any quantitative requirement. If he is not persuaded, he will quiz you and count tools, etc. Have never heard of anyone flunking this thing-- It just seems to be easier and more pleasant if he is persuaded quickly. It was so obvious to the inspector that I "created" this baby that he never asked for the log or photos. Of course I made him look at them any way. D Walsh ________________________________________________________________________________
From: AB320FLYER(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: Duckworks landing lights
Joe, I used the Duckworks lights and as the instructions mentioned, I ground down the backs of the two plastic retainer strips that hold the lens in the original lights, to hold the lights in their brackets. I think they look better than the washers. The washers that are used to attach the brackets to the ribs worked out fine. The only complaint I have is that the plexi lens don't conform very well to the shape of the leading edge. I used the strapping tape to pull the lens into the the opening but there were still some gaps. Does anyone have an idea on how to improve the fit? >Has anyone installed these lights in the wings?Following the instructions I > used the template to cut out the holes in the wing. After this point > things became hazy. Oversized flat washers with counter sunk bolts just > dont make sense. Joel Harding RV-8 ab320flyer(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dbergh(at)micron.net
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Elevator Trim Cover
Hello All, Its good to see the list back up again (thanks for all your hard work Matt!) and just in time to help solve my problem. I am ready to install nutplates on the E615PP electric elevator trim doubler but don't quite know how to make everything fit flush, mostly the #6 screws on the cover plate. The archives have some differing ideas on how to do this but nothing definitive. I don't see how to dimple the cover plate to accept the flush screws and still have the cover fit flush with the skin(no room to accept the back side of the dimples on the 615 plate). Any help greatly appreciated. Dave Bergh ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: Primer cleanup
From: rvpilot(at)juno.com (William R. Davis Jr)
Randy MEK seems to work best to clean up the spray gun after using Sherwin Williams Vinyl Wash Primer. Run some used stuff through first, then follow up with some clean. Pour the rest of the clean into the used MEK container.. Saves a little $$ Bill Davis RV4 N66WD ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: Filling fiberglass seams
<< OK , The seams on my fiberglass tips are not as nice as I had hoped and some filling will be required, especially the rudder bottom. My composit experience is with fiberglass & bondo on cars. What is the best method of filling the gap between the fiberglass & metal? A thin strip of light weight fiberglass? Bondo? Micro baloons (how are they used, mixed with epoxy resin?)? Some other method? TIA Fly Safe Scott A. Jordan -8 #331 >> I prefer the epoxy resin/micro-balloon style, overlaid with a layer or two of 1.5 oz cloth. Remember, you will have vibration trying it's best to break overy joint you have assembled, so try to cover your seams with something a bit more substantial then simple bondo (epoxy/micro) and then cover that with something flexible yet strong (cloth). BTW- I glue the actual tips on with tank sealant. Keep in mind - resin/micro has no structural strength to it. Use resin/flox or milled fibers if you feel that you need some strength from this. Resin/flox is also v hard to sand. Mix your resin/balloons until it is stiff like peanut butter. It will probably still try to follow gravity, so allow for that too. Use a v dry layup on the top layer of cloth. You will use these talents later, when you lay up around your windshield. My hat is off to the fellas that are able to make this area look good- it ain't easy! Check six! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
From: cecilth(at)juno.com
Subject: Re: Primer cleanup
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Randy, I think the directions say to use lacquer thinner. I use MEK for mine. Cecil >go the Sherwin Williams industrial wash primer route. So I bought some >and >then bought a small "detail" gun from Sears. Here come the questions; > >1) What is the best solvent to use for cleanup? I've tried acetone and >it >seems to congeal the remaing primer mix... yikes! > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: cecilth(at)juno.com
Subject: Re: -8 wingwalk reinforcements
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Brian, My 6A kit came with that piece cut to size. Look around harder. Also check your shipping list to see what you received. Cecil writes: > >g'day folks, > >The .025 sheet that is used to reinforce the wing walk area...is it >supposed to be cut from one of the 10"x48" sheets of Alclad? The plans > >call for a piece that is 9"x26", I think. I don't want to cut into >something that I'll need later. I noticed there is no specific part >numer called out here..so, I guess it has to be cut from stock >material. > >Brian Denk >fitting the wing skins ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV4Brown(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re:Plane Takes Off without Pilot!
Gentlemen: Forgive the abuse of the cyberspace. I do not derive pleasure from other people's troubles, but this news article was too much to resist passing on. If the pilot is a member of the list, you have my sympathy. This is a reprint from the Associated Press URBANA, Ohio - A small aircraft took off without its pilot yesterday and flew for nearly two hours before crashing in a field. Paul A. Sirks of Dayton had landed the single engine plane at Urbana's Grimes Field airport because of mechanical problems, said police officer Mike Hughes. The plane's engine stalled on a taxiway and Skirks got out to restart it by hand-turning the propellor. Once the engine started, the empty plane taxied away without Sirks, nearly hitting another aircraft and a hanger before becoming airborne. The plane circled the area for about five minutes, headed north-east, and went down about 90 miles away, some 50 miles north-east of Columbus. No charges had been filed against Sirks. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: A20driver(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: Grass runways???
Hello Pat Carr: We had a good BS session at the Wilmington Fly-In!!! Never found my kind of 3 but looking at a Rocket!!! Big difference..... Best Regards Jim Brown A20driver(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
From: "Anderson Ed" <AndersonE(at)bah.com>
Subject: Belt Driven Vacuum pumps
Can anyone provide any information on belt driven vacuum pumps? I believe I was once informed that a model 241 or 242 is belt driven - can anyone confirm?? Thanks Ed ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Aileron boots
From: wstucklen1(at)juno.com (Frederic W Stucklen)
Listers, For anybody wanting a copy of my aileron boot pattern, send me a SASE at: Fred Stucklen 148 Winkler Rd. E. Windsor, Ct. 06088 What I have is an 8 1/2" X 14" sheet that has the outline for the boot and the reenforcement ring to mount it to the fuselage side. It also has some installation notes to help you out..... The boots can be installed on completed aircraft, but it's a lot easier to install them prior to mounting the wings...... If anyone has a scanner please feel free to scan it and place it into a web site so that all can have it quickly. I've dimensioned everything, so it's easily reconstructed to full size from a picture...... Fred Stucklen RV-6A N925RV (Working on 2'd RV-6A - Chevy Powered!) wstucklen1(at)juno.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Tedd McHenry <tedd(at)idacom.hp.com>
Subject: Re: Grass runways???
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Anthony: I'm sticking my neck out here, considering that I've never made a single take off or landing in an RV. But I have landed on many runways 1,000 feet long or less. I would think that 1,000 feet of grass would be pretty reasonable, so long as there aren't any serious obstacles, and you always treat it with respect (as you should any runway). Once accustomed to big, wide runways, it takes an adjustment to feel comfortable on shorter, narrower ones. ("Treat it with respect" would include not taking off, or not landing there, if the conditions aren't suitable.) Tedd McHenry Surrey, BC [RV-6 tail] ________________________________________________________________________________
From: SAVOYINTL(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: Duckworks landing lights
With regard to getting the lens to fit better ... I found it worked well to heat the plexiglas with a heat gun while forcing it into the leading edge. This helped it take the proper shape without leaving a gap in the front. Lloyd Morris Austin, TX Beginning fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
From: Edward Cole <emcole(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: F602 Bulkhead
Would anyone building a 6/6A please look at their dwg. #25 for the fuselage and give me the diminsions shown for F602? My dwgs are unreadable as it looks liked the diminsions were revised by using a piece of tape and sloppy handwriting. As a result, the copy is unreadable. Looking at the revision block, it says the numbers should be 8 5/8", 8 5/8, and 5". These don't add up to the overall 22 1/8" at the notch. I've been calling Van's all morning and can't get through! Thanks, Ed Cole RV6A Fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ernest Kells" <ernest.kells(at)sympatico.ca>
Subject: Re: angle drill
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Please send me a copy of your catalogue. Sincerely, Ernest Kells 408-313 MacDonald Ave., Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6B 5Y9 ---------- > From: BrownTool(at)aol.com > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: angle drill > Date: December 1, 1997 2:44 AM > > > > << I have a broken THOR angle drill. Any suggestions for repairs or parts? > >> > > If you are in or near a large town, your best bet is a pneumatic tool repair > shop, they do not have to be dedicated to aircraft tools to repair your angle > drill. Look in your yellow pages under pneumatic tools and/or air tools and > keep calling till you find a shop that specializes in repair. > > If you are not in a large enough town to have a pneumatic tool repair shop, > you can handle the repair through the mail with any one of several companies > that specialize in pneumatic tool repair. My company, Brown Aviation Tool > Supply Co., offers repair services with a turn-around time of 2-3 weeks after > receiving the tool in our shop, provided parts are readily available. If you > will call with your location, I might be able to provide you with the name of > a repair shop in your area. > > While I am here, if anyone out there does not have a copy of our free catalog > of sheetmetal tools, please call toll free 1-800-587-3883, or e-mail us at : > BrownTool(at)aol.com and we will be happy to rush a copy to you. With the > holidays coming, be sure and tell your family and friends you want tools > under your tree !!! > > With Best Regards, > > Michael Brown > Brown Aviation Tool Supply Co. > Bethany, OK 73008 > 1-800-587-3883 > 405-495-4991 > BrownTool(at)aol.com > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DenClay(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: Primer cleanup
Randy, I use the SW wash in the small "preval" touch-up jar. The jar is reusable and the non-fluorocarbon propellant canisters are cheap. Use all the primer in the jar, which has one ounce gradients on it for easy mixing of small amounts of primer, then swish a few ounces of lacquer thinner in the jar and spray to clean the nozzle. Dump the thinner in your catch jar for recycling, wipe out the jar and you are done. and the 300 spray sessions? tis as nothing when compared to 12,000 rivets. Best of luck, Dennis Clay RV-8 emp, just finished the rudder ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CHRIS.BROWNE(at)BGE.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Spray Gun
I was about to cough up $100 for a HVLP Spray gun when I saw Avery's "mini" gun with the paper cup. Has anyone used it? Is it as handy as it is avdertised to be? The biggest advantage I can see with the HVLP gun I was looking at was the fact that the gun itself can be inverted since paint cup is separate from the gun and the paint and air are supplied by hoses. Avery's gun looks like it is "upright" only. Chris Browne Chris.Browne(at)BGE.COM -6A Tail kit for Xmas, the wife offered to buy it! Buying more and more and more tools ... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "kevin lane" <n3773(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: What sort of documentation?
Date: Nov 30, 1997
> Just starting an RV-8 kit. I know a "builder's log" and accompanying photos > will be required for certification. Can anyone fill me in on exactly what > is required? After a quick search of the FAA and EAA web sites I can't find > anything. my builders log got written the night before and never looked at. I'm glad I didn't put too much time into it. I think it's pretty apparent who's building and who's paying.(the pro-seal under the fingernails gives it away) kevin 6A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Fesenbek, Gary" <gfesenbek(at)meridium.com>
Subject: Spray Gun
Date: Dec 01, 1997
boundary="---- =_NextPart_001_01BCFE73.7F91FFA0" This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------ =_NextPart_001_01BCFE73.7F91FFA0 I have used other more expensive guns in the past and am very pleased with Avery's gun. To make it somewhat inverted simply buy a few different sizes of mason jars(same top size) and rivit the top to the gun. You won't exactly be able to stand on your head and paint but it will really elimate the spills quite a bit. -----Original Message----- From: CHRIS.BROWNE(at)BGE.com [SMTP:CHRIS.BROWNE(at)BGE.com] Sent: Monday, December 01, 1997 3:21 PM To: rv-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RV-List: Spray Gun I was about to cough up $100 for a HVLP Spray gun when I saw Avery's "mini" gun with the paper cup. Has anyone used it? Is it as handy as it is avdertised to be? The biggest advantage I can see with the HVLP gun I was looking at was the fact that the gun itself can be inverted since paint cup is separate from the gun and the paint and air are supplied by hoses. Avery's gun looks like it is "upright" only. Chris Browne Chris.Browne(at)BGE.COM -6A Tail kit for Xmas, the wife offered to buy it! Buying more and more and more tools ... ------ =_NextPart_001_01BCFE73.7F91FFA0

I have used other more expensive guns = in the past and am very pleased with Avery's gun.  To make it = somewhat inverted simply buy a few different sizes of mason jars(same = top size)  and rivit the top to the gun.  You won't exactly = be able to stand on your head and paint but it will really elimate the = spills quite a bit.


------ =_NextPart_001_01BCFE73.7F91FFA0-- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DkSJC(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: Belt Driven Vacuum pumps
I'm told that Isuzu uses a combination Alternator/Vaccum pump on the diesel versions of the Trooper. It should be a Nippondenso unit that is similar to many I've seen on Experimentals. This would solve two problems, Alternator and Vacuum pump, both belt driven and not filling up the cramped space at the rear of the engine. As an automotive unit, I have to assume it has a much better TBO and lower cost than we're used to. If anyone has any firsthand knowledge please forward it to me off-list Dan Helm -4 working on instruments ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Fesenbek, Gary" <gfesenbek(at)meridium.com>
Subject: What sort of documentation?
Date: Dec 01, 1997
boundary="---- =_NextPart_001_01BCFE74.EDBF4D10" This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------ =_NextPart_001_01BCFE74.EDBF4D10 > Just starting an RV-8 kit. I know a "builder's log" and accompanying photos > will be required for certification. Can anyone fill me in on exactly what > is required? After a quick search of the FAA and EAA web sites I can't find * anything. I would recommend looking into the EAA and the EAA inspection program. They will be able to pair you up with someone who is qualified to look your work over prior to closing things up. If you prefer you can just get a regular A&P to take a look. I develop software for a living and can tell you definitively that you need a separate person to do the Qual work than the person(s) who do the building. Not only is it good practice but just knowing that someone else is definitely going to look at my work has pushed me to replace that marginal rivit when working late into the night and avoid that ' it's only one rivit syndrome'. This to me is much more important than the FAA inspection, because those FAA guys don't have x-ray vision and as such can miss a lot of important stuff. Additionally, getting someone to take a look early can save you a lot of money because, you may do things wrong the same way through the entire project. ------ =_NextPart_001_01BCFE74.EDBF4D10

    > Just = starting an RV-8 kit. I know a "builder's log" and = accompanying
    photos
    > will be = required for certification. Can anyone fill me in on exactly = what
    > is required? = After a quick search of the FAA and EAA web sites I can't
    find

    • anything.

 
I would = recommend looking into the EAA and the EAA inspection program.  = They will be able to pair you up with someone who is qualified to look = your work over prior to closing things up.  If you prefer you can = just get a regular A&P to take a look.  I develop software for = a living = and can tell you definitively that you need a separate = person to = do the Qual work than the person(s) who do the building.  Not = only is = it good practice but just knowing that someone else is definitely going to = look at my work has pushed me to replace that marginal rivit when = working late into the night and avoid that ' it's only one rivit = syndrome'.


This to me is = much more important than the FAA inspection, because those FAA guys = don't have x-ray vision and as such can miss a lot of important stuff.  = Additionally, getting someone to take a look early can save = you a lot = of money because, you may do things wrong the same way through the = entire project.

------ =_NextPart_001_01BCFE74.EDBF4D10-- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stephen J. Soule" <SSoule(at)pfclaw.com>
Subject: Spray Gun
Date: Dec 01, 1997
I did not have a good experience with the gun. The trigger came apart after a year and the nozzle frequently plugged during painting. Un-waxed paper cups are not easy to find. On the other hand it was inexpensive. Steve Soule Huntington, Vermont Fuselage bulkheads in the jig -----Original Message----- From: CHRIS.BROWNE(at)BGE.com [SMTP:CHRIS.BROWNE(at)BGE.com] Sent: Monday, December 01, 1997 3:21 PM To: rv-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RV-List: Spray Gun I was about to cough up $100 for a HVLP Spray gun when I saw Avery's "mini" gun with the paper cup. Has anyone used it? Is it as handy as it is avdertised to be? The biggest advantage I can see with the HVLP gun I was looking at was the fact that the gun itself can be inverted since paint cup is separate from the gun and the paint and air are supplied by hoses. Avery's gun looks like it is "upright" only. Chris Browne Chris.Browne(at)BGE.COM -6A Tail kit for Xmas, the wife offered to buy it! Buying more and more and more tools ... ________________________________________________________________________________ Berkeley!" (Nov 19, 2:46am)
Date: Nov 27, 1997
From: Shirley Hobenshield <shobenshield(at)cmsd.bc.ca>
Subject: Re: Test From Berkeley!
>510-422-4896) > >>-------------- >> >>This is a test >> Got you Matt! Few messages on my machine thought. Keep up the good work! - Ed H ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: Spray Gun
From: m.talley(at)juno.com (Michael L Talley)
On Mon, 1 Dec CHRIS.BROWNE(at)BGE.com writes: > I was about to cough up $100 for a HVLP Spray gun when I saw > Avery's "mini" gun with the paper cup. Has anyone used it? Is > it as handy as it is avdertised to be? The biggest advantage I > can see with the HVLP gun I was looking at was the fact that the > gun itself can be inverted since paint cup is separate from the > gun and the paint and air are supplied by hoses. Avery's gun > looks like it is "upright" only. I have one of these "paper cup" spray gun. I'd advise - save your money and buy a "real" gun. The paper cup gun works sort of ok for real small jobs. Getting the plastic air nozzle and air pressure just right takes some fiddling. I also tried the aerosol pressure cans that have a glass bottle for the paint. Again - buy a real gun and you'll save yourself a lot of messing around. I got a HVLP gun on sale at an auto paint store for around $140. It has the paint can on top - gravity feed - and has worked well. Just make sure and clean it out real good. Once the epoxy primer sets up it's there almost forever! By the way, I finally found the manufacturer for alodine (Iridite 14-2) in powder form. They are: MacDermid Inc 245 Freight St Waterbury CT 60702 phone 203-575-5700. They don't sell direct but were happy to put me in touch with suppliers in my area. The minimum size sold is 10# for around $160. It takes 1 to 1.5 oz per gallon of water so 10# will last forever. Maybe local builder's groups would want to buy for the builders in their area? Mike Talley RV-6 alodining and priming the second wing skins ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
From: Mike Wills <willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil>
Subject: Re: Belt Driven Vacuum pumps
Please make that info on-list. I, and probably others are interested also. Mike Wills RV-4(wings done!, saving pennies for fuse kit) willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil > >I'm told that Isuzu uses a combination Alternator/Vaccum pump on the diesel >versions of the Trooper. It should be a Nippondenso unit that is similar to >many I've seen on Experimentals. >If anyone has any firsthand knowledge please forward it to me off-list > >Dan Helm >-4 working on instruments ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
From: Edward Cole <emcole(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Spray Gun
CHRIS.BROWNE(at)BGE.com wrote: > > > I was about to cough up $100 for a HVLP Spray gun when I saw > Avery's "mini" gun with the paper cup. Has anyone used it? Is > it as handy as it is avdertised to be? The biggest advantage I > can see with the HVLP gun I was looking at was the fact that the > gun itself can be inverted since paint cup is separate from the > gun and the paint and air are supplied by hoses. Avery's gun > looks like it is "upright" only. > > Chris Browne > Chris.Browne(at)BGE.COM > -6A Tail kit for Xmas, the wife offered to buy it! > Buying more and more and more tools ... > Don't do it......just go out into the street an through $20 bill into the wind. It will be a better use of your money! Seriously, I tried one and wasted more valuable Veriprime than I'd like to admit. I used a $25 Auto touch up gun for awhile and it worked ok but I wasted a lot of material due to overspray. I finally bought an inexpensive HVLP gun from Harbor Freight and love it. It will pay for itself in the amount of Veriprime that you don't waste to overspray. Contact me personally if you want a part number. Ed Cole RV6A Fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: Heater in 6A
<< I do have a pattern for the aileron boot if you need it. Email me for an address.. >> BTW, Fred, I have turned your hand drawing into a true sized ACAD drawing and it's available to anyone who wants it. I could send it as an attachment if you have access to AutoCAD for plotting. -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: NM Fuselage Jig Wanted
Date: Dec 01, 1997
From: n5lp <n5lp(at)carlsbad.net>
I have a non-list friend who is looking for an RV-6 fuselage jig for use in a few months. He lives in Dexter, NM (near Roswell). Anyone in New Mexico or west Texas who will have a jig available that they would like to pass on please contact Tom Benedict at 505-622-3458. Larry Pardue Carlsbad, NM Pacer N8025D RV-6QME N441LP Reserved Mounting Autopilot Servo ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
From: John Kitz <jkitz(at)greenapple.com>
Subject: Re: What sort of documentation?
Randy Lervold wrote: > > > Just starting an RV-8 kit. I know a "builder's log" and accompanying photos > will be required for certification. Can anyone fill me in on exactly what > is required? After a quick search of the FAA and EAA web sites I can't find > anything. > >Randy; Contact the FAA and get Advisory Circular # 20-27D titled Certification and Operation of Amateur-Built Aircraft. It will answer a lot of questions. The FAA has a complete packet of available information . The same circular describes the conditional inspection, not an annual. John Kitz N721JK RV-4 186 hours ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
From: chuckie8 <chuckie8(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Installing flaps
John T. Craig-Stearman wrote: > > > RV-4 builders, > While installing my flaps on the airplane I ran into a problem. The > aluminum plate on the inboard end of each flap scrapes the side of the > fuselage when traveling to the up position. I have measured everything I > can think of, flap width, aileron to flap gap, etc., and I can't find any > deviation from the plans dimensions. Has anyone else run into this > problem? If so, how did you correct it? > Thanks, > Tom Craig-Stearman > tcraig-stearman(at)juno.com > RV-4 complete airframe now! Engine next. > Tom, same problem with mine. Don't think you measured anything wrong, it's just one of those things that don't fit! Why? I don't know. Ask Van. I had to cut my flaps off about 3/8 inch on the inside and re-mount & re-rivet the aluminum plate that connects to the push rod. A real pain in the butt, especially when you did everything right.Measure twice, cut twice! I don't see any other way to fix it. About 4-5 hours per flap. Buy a punching bag. It helps.------------- chuck ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
From: Greg Young <gyoung@cs-sol.com>
Subject: Re: Spray Gun
CHRIS.BROWNE(at)BGE.com wrote: > I was about to cough up $100 for a HVLP Spray gun when I saw > Avery's "mini" gun with the paper cup. Has anyone used it? Is > it as handy as it is avdertised to be? The biggest advantage I Chris, I used it for awhile and found it adequate for most things. The cleanup was certainly easy, as advertised. But I found myself spilling paint when trying to paint skins horizontally or when cup was too heavy and fell off (I now have a pair of green tennies:). The paint jobber where I get my Variprime suggested using an old gun for primer... said they use guns retired from finish work for primer since most primers are corrosive/erosive (Variprime has phospheric acid in it for etching). I bought a cheap ($32) gun from Lowe's and it's great. Since I will only use it for primer, I don't obsess on cleanup and it's almost as easy as the paper cup. -- Greg Young
gyoung@cs-sol.com Citabria N90AV RV-6 s/n 23070 skinning fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV4131rb(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: Installing flaps
<< RV-4 builders, While installing my flaps on the airplane I ran into a problem. The aluminum plate on the inboard end of each flap scrapes the side of the fuselage when traveling to the up position. I have measured everything I can think of, flap width, aileron to flap gap, etc., and I can't find any deviation from the plans dimensions. Has anyone else run into this problem? If so, how did you correct it? >> Tom-Craig?, This is not a new problem. I had the same problem on my 4 and so have other people Ive talked to. I took a little different aproach from others in correcting this problem. I drilled out the rivets attatching the rib at the inboard end of the flap. I also removed the rivets holding the plate assy together. I moved the rib outboard (away from the fuselage) a quarter of an inch and picked up the holes from the rib into the skin. I filed the old holes with rivets and reasembled. When finished you have two rows of rivets instead of one. Hardly noticeable ,very tidy looking and hiden when the flaps are up under the wing root fairing anyway. Beats banging on your structure or filling away to much material to make it fit. Hope this helps, I remember how pissed off I was when I found out mine didnt fit. Ryan ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Barnes, Eric" <eric.barnes(at)tandem.com>
Subject: Duckworks landing lights - Try a different lens?
Date: Dec 01, 1997
At Van's homecoming I met a builder that had made his own landing light set up. He had fabricated a lens out of a shop face shield. It was quite flexible and had been installed for 5+ years and over a few hundred hours. It also had no appreciable scratches (what I would worry about). I have the Duckworks kit, but if that lens is difficult to install, I may substitute this idea, unless someone can think of a draw back. I'll probably use a motorcycle face shield... EB #80131 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: heated pitot tube information
From: gretz-aero(at)juno.com (Warren Gretz)
I now have an e-mail address that I can use for getting and replying to questions about my pitot tube mounting bracket kits, new pitot tubes, and my newest product, ToolKey. ToolKey is an attractive, polished stainless steel, key fob tool designed to open the fuel filler caps on your RV. The head of ToolKey has your RV model laser cut into it. These are attractive, and useful, they also make a great gift item for your RV buddies. Please contact me if you would like a flyer on my products, have questions about them, or would just like to make comments to me. Warren Gretz Gretz Aero 3664 East Lake Drive Littleton, Colorado 80121 e-mail: gretz-aero(at)juno.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
From: spjohnsn(at)ix.netcom.com (Stephen Paul Johnson)
Subject: Re: Elevator Trim Cover
Dave wrote: >I am ready to install nutplates on the E615PP electric elevator trim >doubler but don't quite know how to make everything fit flush, mostly >the >#6 screws on the cover plate. The archives have some differing ideas on >how to do this but nothing definitive. I don't see how to dimple the >cover plate to accept the flush screws and still have the cover fit >flush with the skin(no room to accept the back side of the dimples on >the 615 plate). >Any help greatly appreciated. >Dave Bergh > OK, here's what worked for me. I mounted the nutplates and countersunk all the way down to the steel using a deburring tool and lots of pressure. I then dimpled the cover with dies for AN426-4 rivets. This gives dimples that fit snug into the countersink, but the screws still don't sit flush. Countersink into the cover dimple just enough to have the screw fit flush. I fiddled around with scrap with a friend to come up with this. I sectioned the countersunk dimple in the scrap with my bandsaw to check the thickness of metal remaining, and I was satisfied that the countersinking had not removed much material. Steve Johnson RV-8 #80121 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rvmils(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: -8 wingwalk reinforcements
yes the left over .025 is use for the wing access covers. closing the wings Carey Mills ________________________________________________________________________________
From: cjfranz(at)juno.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: F602 Bulkhead
writes: >Would anyone building a 6/6A please look at their dwg. #25 for the >fuselage and give me the diminsions shown for F602? Ed, My full size drawing # 25 is just as bad as your's, but the reduced size drawing in the preview plan set is a lot clearer. The dimensions shown there are 5", 8 3/8", 8 5/8" , bottom to top. The preview plan set is the same revision as the full size set. Hope this helps. Carl Franz Working on the wings, starting the Fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rbz1(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Rudder Hinge Dimentions
Hello RV list Does anyone know if there any info on the dimensions to set the rudder hinge rod ends? Due to the different VS hinge lengths I would assume the rod end length varies also. Or do you just line them up and try them until they work? Any ideas? Rich Zeidman RV6A S/N 25224 finishing up empinage kit- Waiting for wing kit ________________________________________________________________________________
From: QmaxLLC(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: engine options, etc.
First define what you want to do with the airplane, then find the airplane. Do it the other way around and you spend money where not needed and spend not enough on what is needed. You want a Rocket? "Rocket" is a relative term as well a brand name. Got lots of hours in a 152? Then any RV is a rocket. Need to get out of tight spot? How much rocket is enough? Go to Van's, mooch a ride in the 8, and then see if you still want to build a Rocket. I suspect the 8 with it's "little" engine is rocket enough. In that you're commited to building, it could be the cheapest research and the biggest dollar savings you could ask for. Bob Fritz ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Elevator Trim Cover
<3482EA15.4959(at)micron.net>
From: smcdaniels(at)juno.com (SCOTT R MCDANIELS)
Date: Dec 01, 1997
I'm not absolutely certain with out looking into it but I believe that with the space constraints that truss head instead of flush head screws were meant to be used. Since they are only #6 and relatively small they shouldn't slow you down too much. Scott McDaniels N64SD / RV-6A 560+ Hrs. These ideas and opinions are my own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of my employer. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: faa
From: smcdaniels(at)juno.com (SCOTT R MCDANIELS)
Date: Dec 01, 1997
The FAA says you must notified them if you make a Major Change. Anything that could effect the flight characteristics of the airplane, and generally in there opinion a propeller falls in this category. The may issue you another flight test duration (usually less than issued for the first flight). Bill B., general manager at Vans just put a new O-360 with a Warnke prop on his well flight tested RV-4 and I believe he had a much reduced flight test duration. - maybe he can comment more - If you are having trouble getting a prop match you are happy with. Consider getting in touch with one of the prop makers that will carve you a prop and just finish it with sealer, and then have you fly it. Send it back as often as you are willing to pay the UPS freight, and they will keep adjusting till your happy. Then they will go ahead and finish it completely with leading edge protection, clear finish, and paint, etc. Scott McDaniels N64SD / RV-6A 560+ Hrs. These ideas and opinions are my own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of my employer. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: RE: RV-LIST: Heater in 6A
From: smcdaniels(at)juno.com (SCOTT R MCDANIELS)
Date: Dec 01, 1997
I had originally sent this to jim directly because I wasn't sure if the list was fully operational yet, but I'm posting it here now in case anyone else is interested in the approach I have used successfully on 5 RV's now, including the new yellow RV-8. Jim, I'm not sure if the list is up and running yet so I'm replying off list. The cross over pipe is not necessarily any worse of a location than others. I have found that you can improve the heat output regardless where the heat muff is mounted. What I do is remove the little air dam that is riveted to the inside of the heat muff, and seal the holes used to attach it using rivets of your choice. Then go to the housewares dept of your local grocery store and buy a bunch of the little stainless steel scrubber pads that are made for pot scrubbing. They look like stainless steel wire mesh in 2 " diam. ball. Buy enough packages to have 8 to 10 scrubber pads. While installing/closing the split heat muff, insert enough scrubber pads to just fill the space inside the muff. Don't pack them in (you still want air to freely flow through) put in just enough to fill the interior volume. It's also a good idea to lace a piece of safety wire through the pads at the outlet end of the muff to be sure that none of them can get blown out; especially if you are also using the muff for carb heat. Let me know if it helps; Their are other things that could be causing poor heat output. Where is the source (inlet) that is providing the air to the heat muff? BTW this fix will reduce the amount of air that comes through the heat system slightly (also slows it down so it has TIME to get heated up more), but it provides a higher temp. air coming through. Scott McDaniels N64SD / RV-6A 560+ Hrs. These ideas and opinions are my own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of my employer. - ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Rudder Hinge Dimentions
From: smcdaniels(at)juno.com (SCOTT R MCDANIELS)
Date: Dec 01, 1997
I believe somewhere in the emp. drawings (not sure which #) it shows a nominal dimension for the distance between the stab. spar and the rudder spar. Scott McDaniels N64SD / RV-6A 560+ Hrs. These ideas and opinions are my own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of my employer. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rbz1(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: Belt Driven Vacuum pumps
I'm installing a belt driven vacuum pump kit on my clubs 172. This kit is for the cont O300 engine and is from Airborne. However, the kit is just about unavailable from what I have found. I found a used kit from Wentworth Aircraft and it will work fine. I don't know if they also have a kit for the O320/O360. If you want any more info I will try to dig up what I can Rich Zeidman RV6A SN25224 empinage almost complete ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
From: Frank Smidler <smidler(at)dcwi.com>
Subject: RV-6 flap trimming
Recently there was a discussion on the list about trimming the inboard end of the flap. I've just finished my RV-6 flaps and the fit up to the fuselage with very good results and thought I'd pass on what I learned. First, during the wing construction I rivited up the bottom skin of the flap with its ribs except for the inboard one which I only drilled. The spar was drilled to the ribs and the bottom skin with the hinge but only clecoed on. Make sure that the spar is tight against the ribs when you drill it the the bottom skin or later you could induce a twist into the assembly. Using I think Frank Justices method of installing and aligning the ailerons and flap I positioned the wings vertically with the nose down. The wing top skins were riveted on but the bottoms were still only clecoed. Following his proceedure I aligned and installed the aileron hinges and flap hinges with the aileron and bottom flap assembly in place (his proceedure uses the tooling holes for alignment and no wing profile). The top flap skin trailing end was aligned with the aileron trailing edge and a couple of alignment holes were drilled to locate it to the bottom flap assembly. The inboard linkage attachment peices were not yet installed. At this point I set the incompleted flaps aside and proceeded to finish the wings and build the fuselage. (Fast forward 2 years) After getting the fuselage on the gear and the wings installed I was now ready to complete the flaps. I drilled the top skin to the bottom assembly. With the top skin off I put the bottom flap assembly onto the wing. This allowed me to mark edge of the fuselage onto the bottom skin. THIS IS NOT FOR CUTTING, It is for locating the inboard flap linkage plate. Next, I used poster board to make a template that when set on top of the inboard two flap ribs would reach from the spar to the trailing edge of the inboard rib and would follow the fuselage contour. This is easy to do with siccors using trial and error. This was taped into place as if it were the top skin. Take the flap off of the wing and set it on a bench, position the top skin and cleco into place with the template still in place. A few clecos can actually be pushed through the template. Flip it over and trace the edge of the template onto the bottom side of the top skin. Remove the top skin, extend the trim line to the front and rear. Cut along the line. At approximately 1/2" from the trailing edge, angle the cut off to the inboard edge. This area will be final trimmed on the fuselage. After filing the edge, cleco the top flap skin on and reinstall onto the wing. Pivot it up and trim the last 1/2" with a rat tail and small striaght file. You should now have a perfect fitting top flap skin to fuselage intersection. Please remember that the bottom skin DOES NOT GET TRIMMED. With the flaps off the wing and the top skin off the inboard brackets can be made. The fuselage line on the bottom skin will be used to position the inboard linkage attachment plate. This plate should be at 1/8" away from the fuselage. I hope this is of some help. Now the only question is if 1/16" clearance is enough between the fuselage and flap to prevent rubbing under flight load? Frank Smidler smidler(at)dcwi.com RV-6, working on finishing. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: F602 Bulkhead
<> Ed- They are clearly 8 5/8", 8 3/8" and 5". I don't know where you got the 22 1/8" dimension. -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: Rudder Hinge Dimentions
<< Does anyone know if there any info on the dimensions to set the rudder hinge rod ends? Due to the different VS hinge lengths I would assume the rod end length varies also. Or do you just line them up and try them until they work? >> Basically, Yes. You need to have at least the minimum engagement of the rod end threads (one diameter will do but no less). The rest is by successive approximation. Get the top and bottom rod ends set up so that you get the needed travel without contact, then dial the center one in. -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
From: Dave Barnhart <barnhart(at)a.crl.com>
Subject: F>I. alternate air
I'm trying to figure out where to put an alternate air door. Let me explain. I have a fuel injected engine (IO320B1A) with the Bendix Fuel Injection Servo, and the FAB-360 filtered air box. Van provides instructions with the FAB for a carb heat door, but those of us with fuel injected engines are on our own. Fuel injected engines don't suffer from carb ice and therefore don't need carb heat, but there SHOULD be an alternate path for intake air. I've yet to see a production fuel-injected airplane without an alternate air inlet. I know that some people have simply used the carb heat door on the FAB as an alternate air door, but I don't believe that is the right thing to do. If you need the alternate air, it is because something is blocking the normal air inlet. If something is going to get jammed into the air intake (like a bird, for instance), the spot in the FAB where the carb heat door is located is probably the spot where the jammed object will be. I talked this problem over with a friend of mine who is an A&P and the builder/rebuilder/restorer/owner of several airplanes, and we agreed that the alternate air door should be located out of the normal path of intake air. That leaves us with two possibilities: 1. The bottom of the fiberglass 'bowl' of the FAB forms the seal around the bottom of the filter element (This is a little different than the FAB-320). The ideal place, then for the alternate air door would be the bottom of the fiberglass 'bowl'. An alternate air door here would provide a path that completely bypasses the normal intake path and the air filter. The only problem is that there is only about 1.75 inched clearance between the bottom of the FAB and the bottom of the scoop. Not a lot of room for a door to open. 2. Put the alternate air door on the back of the FAB's fiberglass 'bowl'. This is less attractive, but probably more workable. So I'm taking a survey, of sorts. I'm asking anyone who is installing or has installed a fuel injected engine to please tell me what you did for an alternate air door. Thanks in advance, Dave Barnhart rv-6 sn 23744 N601DB down to the last 90 percent ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: Frank van der Hulst <frankv(at)pec.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Rudder Hinge Dimentions
> I believe somewhere in the emp. drawings (not sure which #) it shows a > nominal dimension for the distance between the stab. spar and the rudder > spar. I think Scott's right. Also, my page http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Hangar/4809/bunny1b.htm has my experiences in that area (and others). Frank. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GHLX34A(at)prodigy.com (MR GEORGE T KILISHEK)
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: True Love
Bob: Yes, I have tiried that. Actually, she understands about planes real well. Just doesn't want to have anything to do with them at altitudes > 1 millimeter. Thanks for the thought. George Kilishek ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JamesCone(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: Heater in 6A
I used the Robin Wings muffs and put one on each pipe of my crossover system just downstream from the swivel connections. I fed the air from one into the other and then to the cockpit. This provided way too much heat so I took one of them off. I installed the "Y" fitting that Van's sells on the cockpit side of the heat valve and then made two piccolo tubes to spread the heat and attached one to each side of the Y with scat tube. Each piccolo tube is mounted just above the rudder pedals, one on each side of the cockpit. The system works great. To get heat to the upper part of the cockpit and to defog the canopy, I have two fans in the glareshield that draw warm air from the foot wells and blow it on to the windshield. This makes the upper half of the cockpit very warm and comfortable even in the coldest conditions. Jim Cone RV-6A flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JamesCone(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: True Love
Take heart! My wife was also not very excited about the prospect of flying in my RV when I started. What finally got her to take a ride was seeing all of the passengers that I took for rides come back with this great big grin on their faces. The first ride was OK, but she was still not too anxious to fly with me. I didn't push the issue. Then she went on another ride with a little more knowledge of what to expect and she liked it better than the first one. Each ride went a bit better and now she loves it. She completely lost her aprehensions about the RV and even fell asleep on a cross country flight to Boone Iowa. I took a 64 year old lady friend (who is also a pilot) for a ride and she insisted that I wring the plane out a bit and do some mild aerobatics with her. I landed and this lady started telling my wife how much she enjoyed the aerobatics that I did. That did it! My wife had to try it for herself. It is not her cup of tea, but now at least I can get a roll in now and then when we fly. Be patient and understanding with her and she may also come to love flying in your RV. My wife wrote an article for one of the 1997 issues of my newsletter in which she described her thoughts about building and flying. It is must reading for your significant other if she (or he) has any reservations about your project. You can get back issues of the newsletter from the new editor, Kevin Lowery. They are $5.00 per year. Contact Kevin at kevinlowery(at)compuserve.com. Jim Cone RV-6A flying ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
From: Mike Hartmann <hartmann(at)sound.net>
Subject: Re: Duckworks landing lights - Try a different lens?
>I have the Duckworks kit, but if that lens is difficult to install, I The Duckworks kit, and lens is extremely easy to install. The directions are clear and concise; the hardware is first-class. You won't be disappointed. The only thing to watch for, and it is clearly mentioned in the Duckworks documentation, is to file or grind off the humps at the leading edge curve to get a good fit. Look closely at the edges of the lense at the curve and you'll easily see what needs to be done. It's hard to imagine you would be able to fabricate a better system at for less money. The Duckworks lights easily pass the RV performance vs cost for value test. I like them enough to put one at the end of each wing. - Mike hartmann(at)sound.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
From: Mike Hartmann <hartmann(at)sound.net>
Subject: Re: Duckworks landing lights
>the ribs worked out fine. The only complaint I have is that the plexi lens >don't conform very well to the shape of the leading edge. I used the My lenses fit very nicely, but only after I carefully filed off the humps at the curve for the leading edge. It only took about 2-3 minutes per lens of adjustment with a file and they fit great. This step is mentioned in the documentation. - Mike hartmann(at)sound.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
From: Mike Hartmann <hartmann(at)sound.net>
Subject: Re: Duckworks landing lights
>Has anyone installed these lights in the wings?Following the instructions I >used the template to cut out the holes in the wing. After this point >things became hazy. Oversized flat washers with counter sunk bolts just >dont make sense. The examples consist of four black and white photo's Yes, one in each wing. Both were easy to install and fit great. I also thought the countersunk bolts in flat washers looked a little cheesy, but once installed, they worked so well I have no plans to change them. The only thing I can recommend is to pay particular attention to the instruction to file or grind off the hump on the lens at the leading edge where the plastic lens meets the aluminum leading edge. It WILL take some filing or grinding to get a good fit; it WON'T take more than a few minutes. - Mike hartmann(at)sound.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
From: Charlie Kuss <charliekuss(at)sprintmail.com>
Subject: Re: Rudder Hinge Dimentions
Rbz1(at)aol.com wrote: snippe > Hello RV list > Does anyone know if there any info on the dimensions to set the rudder hinge > rod ends? Due to the different VS hinge lengths I would assume the rod end > length varies also. Or do you just line them up and try them until they work? > Any ideas? Rich, I emailed Van's about this a few days ago. About 2 hours after sending the question, I looked a little closer at my plans (I'm building an RV-8, but the rudder & VS are basicly the same). On 6PP on the lower left corner, it shows that the distance between VS & rudder spars is 2" at the top edge and 2.5" at the bottom. When Van's responded, they said the dimension is not critical. I spent the extra time to get it right so that my counterbalance skin would stay parallel to the VS skin top edge. Hope this helps. Charlie Kuss RV-8 #80372 elevators Boca Raton, Fl. se standard K1000 style nutplates by making a spacer out of .060" aluminium to be placed between the nutplate & the reinforcing plate. Countersink the .060" material, dimple the cover and the reinforcing plate for the screws. Charlie Kuss RV-8 #80372 elevators Boca Raton, Florida ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: F>I. alternate air
From: smcdaniels(at)juno.com (SCOTT R MCDANIELS)
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Hi Dave, I'm not sure but isn't an alt. air door provided on a lot of certified birds with F.I. because the air filter assembly is remote from the servo; which provides a lot of places that something could get caught in the intake system? I believe this is the case and the reason the have one. Like you mentioned; when using the FAB if something gets caught then it is right there at the filter. In any case I think you are in the same situation regardless of whether you have F.I. or a carb. So I don't think your F.I. installation warrants an alt air door any more than a carb installation. Doesn't mean we shouldn't have them, but I don't know of anyone that has done what you are describing. BTW with the kind of damage that I have seen from bird contact at 180 mph I think its more likely that the airbox wouldn't be there any more than it is for it to have one plugging it up. Let us know if you come up with any slick ideas. Scott McDaniels N64SD / RV-6A 560+ Hrs. These ideas and opinions are my own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of my employer. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 01, 1997
Subject: Re: faa
From: less_drag(at)juno.com (James E Ayers)
writes: > >I am going through the process of finding the correct prop for my >plane. Am I suppose to notify the faa everytime I try a different prop, >other than the one the inspector signed off? I know a lot of guys try >different props all the time and never notify the faa. I believe Jim >Ayers said he has to get a new air worthiness certificate when he tests >a new prop. I am mostly concerned with insurance coverage should >anything happen while I have a prop other than the one signed off by the >inspector on my plane, even if the prop has nothing to do with any >incident that may occur. Does anyone have experience or knowledge in >this area? Thanks. Michael When I installed the LOM engine in my RV-3, I had the new airworthiness certificate address both a fixed pitch wood prop and the ground adjustable Ivoprop Magnum prop. This allowed me to change between the props specified. I had a ten hours flight test period for the new LOM engine installation. When the electric variable pitch Ivoprop Magnum prop became available, I got a new airworthiness certificate. My present airworthiness certificate covers my wood prop, the Ivoprop ground adjustable prop, and (after the additional ten hour flight test period) the Ivoprop Magnum Variable pitch prop. Since they are specified in my airworthiness certificate, I can switch between any of them. However, I had to demonstrate all of them to get this. IMHO, The FAR definitions apply for major and minor alterations. But the controlling document for a homebuilt is the airworthiness certificate for YOUR aircraft. Ask to have it written to include what YOU want. Just remember one thing, though. I had to demonstrate ALL of the props on my RV-3 to complete the flight restrictions. Jim Ayers RV-3 N47RV Maroon Marauder LOM M332A engine Warnke fixed pitch wood prop (Reference "Standard") Sportcraft Wingtip COM antenna and Vertical Stabilizer COM antenna Less_Drag(at)juno.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WBWard(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: Elevator Trim Cover
<< E615PP electric elevator trim doubler >> You aren't using your preview plans are you? That part number rings a bell from when I was researching something on the "Junkyard Dog" RV-4. The preview plans called for a part number that had "PP" behind it, but when I looked at the big plans (the ones with my serial number) the "PP" wasn't there. Regards Wendell WBWard(at)AOL.COM Slave to the "Junkyard Dog" RV-4 S/No 4239 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)traveller.com>
Subject: Re: Spray Gun
Edward Cole wrote: > I finally bought an inexpensive HVLP gun from Harbor Freight and love it. > It will pay for itself in the amount of Veriprime that you don't waste to overspray. > Contact me personally if you want a part number. Ed, please give us the part number. Thanks, Sam Buchanan sbuc(at)traveller.com http://www.ath.tis.net/~sbuc/rv6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: lottmc(at)datastar.net (Michael C. Lott)
Subject: Re: faa
Thanks for the info, Jim. Michael ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: George McNutt <GMcNutt(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: Spar Rivets
Just starting to rivet wing spar -6 rivets at outboard end of wing spar and using the Avery C tool. I am getting a slight gap (.020") between the W606A spar and the W606C web. Drilled out rivets and tried again using bolts through adjacent holes on each side of rivet to hold everything together, but still not happy with results. Plans and pictures included with instructions show the -6 rivets facing aft in the wing spar, this puts the factory head on the thinest piece of material - and goes against the rule to put factory head on the thicker material. Previous posts about this problem occuring on the HS spar have recommended turning the rivets around so factory head is on thicker metal, would this suggestion also be ok on outboard end of wing spar (stn. 74 to 109) or does anyone have other suggestions ? Thanks, George McNutt, Langley BC -6A wing spars ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: George McNutt <GMcNutt(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: Elevator Trim Cover
>I am ready to install nutplates on the E615PP electric elevator trim >doubler but don't quite know how to make everything fit flush - I don't >see how to dimple the cover plate to accept the flush screws and still >have the cover fit flush with the skin (no room to accept the back side >of the dimples on the 615 plate). Hi Dave I countersunk for and used small cheater rivets to attach the nutplates, then countersunk right down and slightly into the nutplates to make room for the dimple in the outside cover plate (E-616PP). The screw heads did not sit down flush into the cover plate so I countersunk slightly into the cover plate dimple. The screws still stick up about .005" but I don't want to take out any more metal and it looks OK now and will be great when painted. George McNutt, Langley BC. Wing Spars & trouble with those -6 rivets! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: George McNutt <GMcNutt(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: Re: Spray Gun
> I was about to cough up $100 for a HVLP Spray gun when I saw > Avery's "mini" gun with the paper cup. Has anyone used it? Is > it as handy as it is avdertised to be? The biggest advantage I > can see with the HVLP gun I was looking at was the fact that the > gun itself can be inverted since paint cup is separate from the > gun and the paint and air are supplied by hoses. Avery's gun > looks like it is "upright" only. Hi Chris Initially I was not satisfied with the Avery spray gun because the paper cups kept falling off. Called Avery's and they said I could return it before or after a suggested modification to rivet a canning jar lid on and using glass jars to hold the paint. After modification I decided to keep the gun and I have used it to prime the empennage and wing spars. Reasonably good results with epoxy primer, no other problems and easy to use and clean. George McNutt Wing Spars 6-A ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: Royce Craven <roycec(at)ozemail.com.au>
Subject: Re: Heater in 6A
GV > > ... > >Place pickup 2" diameter flanges as low as possible on the rear baffles so >the air is already slightly warmed before it gets to the muff. > >.... I saw this on George's video and I was concerned that if there was a exhaust leak it would feed into the heater duct. Is this a 'real' concern? (I haven't mounted my engine yet so I'm not sure if the exhaust pipes get anywhere near the air path.) Royce Craven ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: Spar Rivets
From: bstobbe(at)juno.com (Bruce D Stobbe)
George McNutt writes: snip >Plans and pictures included with instructions show the -6 rivets >facing aft in the wing spar, this puts the factory head on the thinest piece of >material - and goes against the rule to put factory head on the >thicker material. This probably won't be much help as far as your problem goes, but I believe that the factory head (the one on the rivet before driving it) is supposed to be against the thinner material when possible, and the shop head (the one you make with your bucking bar) is supposed to be on the side with the thicker material. This has always worked best for me as far as preventing distortion of the parts being mated when driving rivets, especially the #4s. OTOH, I've noticed that the plans often have the rivets the other way around for no apparent reason. Although I generally install them according to the plans (when possible), I have always experienced the best results when the shop head is against the thicker material. I do not know whether there is any difference in strength between the two methods. However, I would bet that the shop-head-on-the-thicker-material would be stronger since there is no distortion of the mating surfaces. Bruce Stobbe RV-6 fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Eckstein" <eckstein@net-link.net>
Subject: Re: Heater in 6A
Date: Dec 02, 1997
> I do have a pattern for the aileron boot if you need it. Email me for > an address.. > > > Fred Stucklen RV-6A N925RV > (Working on 2'd RV-6A - Chevy Powered!) > wstucklen1(at)juno.com This sounds like something that many of us could use. Any possibility of getting it out on one of the RV home pages? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Eckstein" <eckstein@net-link.net>
Subject: Re: Spar Rivets
Date: Dec 02, 1997
---------- > > Just starting to rivet wing spar -6 rivets at outboard end of wing spar and > using the Avery C tool. I am getting a slight gap (.020") between the W606A > spar and the W606C web. I had the same problem, but solved it by "seating" the assembly onto each rivet head by placing a 1/4" drive deep socket of appropriate diameter over the rivet and tapping the flange strip lightly. Do this to each rivet just prior to setting the rivet. > Thanks, > George McNutt, Langley BC > -6A wing spars > Brian Eckstein 6A Still wings ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: Denny Harjehausen <harje(at)proaxis.com>
Subject: Re: Heater in 6A
Jim, Where did you tap your inlet air from on the baffle? I installed the "Y" fitting that Van's sells on the cockpit >side of the heat valve and then made two piccolo tubes to spread the heat and >attached one to each side of the Y with scat tube. >Jim Cone >RV-6A flying The "piccolo tubes", where did you get them or did you manufacture them? Thanks. Have a good one. Denny RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ken_Hitchmough(at)magic.ca (Ken Hitchmough)
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: F>I. alternate air
Hi Dave, My inspector required me to do the same with my fuel injected 360. I didn't want another cable run so I tried something. I put a door (hinged upwards) in the bottom of the FAB right inside the filter. I then secured it closed with a spring. My idea was that if the filter became completely blocked, vacuum would suck the door open enough for me to get home. I later decided to close it off as I just wasn't able to be confident in it. I also left a screw and nut secured through the bottom of the FAB which later vibrated through the 'glass and got sucked up into the servo...BE CAREFUL, the FAB is VERY thin. What I'm going to do once the weather turns to spring is to put a sliding door on the FAB. I think if I ever needed to use alt air, it would be in an emergency and I'd probably want to take the cowl off to reset it anyway. Ken RV6A FLying I'm trying to figure out where to put an alternate air door. Let me explain. I have a fuel injected engine (IO320B1A) with the Bendix Fuel Injection Servo, and the FAB-360 filtered air box. Van provides instructions with the FAB for a carb heat door, but those of us with fuel injected engines are on our own. Fuel injected engines don't suffer from carb ice and therefore don't need carb heat, but there SHOULD be an alternate path for intake air. I've yet to see a production fuel-injected airplane without an alternate air inlet. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: Charlie Kuss <charliekuss(at)sprintmail.com>
Subject: [Fwd: Free RV photos to good home]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------34B279AD535D I sent this last Thursday. Apparently, it was swallowed up into cyberspace while the list was down. --------------34B279AD535D Date: Thu, 27 Nov 1997 20:36:12 -0500 From: Charlie Kuss <charliekuss(at)sprintmail.com> Subject: Free RV photos to good home Hi all! Ed Anderson was kind enough to mail me his very nice engine bay photos. He has built an RV-6A with a Mazda 13B. It appears to be a first rate installation. I have scanned the photos (15 in all) and sent his photos back. Is anyone with an RV related web site willing to put these photos on their site? They come with 3 typewritten pages explaining the photos. They have all their shots and come with a free flea collar. :-) Charlie Kuss RV-8 making elevator stiffeners on Thanksgiving. I'm thankful I have an understanding girlfriend. Boca Raton, Florida --------------34B279AD535D-- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dbergh(at)micron.net
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: Elevator Trim Cover
Charlie Kuss wrote: > > > dbergh(at)micron.net wrote: > > > Hello All, > snipped > > > I am ready to install nutplates on the E615PP electric elevator trim > > doubler but don't quite know how to make everything fit flush, mostly > > the > > #6 screws on the cover plate. The archives have some differing ideas on > > how to do this but nothing definitive. I don't see how to dimple the > > cover plate to accept the flush screws and still have the cover fit > > flush with the skin(no room to accept the back side of the dimples on > > the 615 plate). > > Any help greatly appreciated. > > Dave Bergh > > Hi Dave, > You & I are at about the same point in building. I know that they make > dimpled nutplates specificly for the situation you discribe. I went over > to Jody Edwards' (A&P, EAA tech councilor & RV-4 builder) house tonight > to: #1 help him with his plane, #2 borrow his visegrip dimplers. :-) > I posed your question to him. He also mentioned using the dimpled > nutplates. However, he said you can use standard K1000 style nutplates > by making a spacer out of .060" aluminium to be placed between the > nutplate & the reinforcing plate. Countersink the .060" material, dimple > the cover and the reinforcing plate for the screws. > > Charlie Kuss > RV-8 #80372 elevators > Boca Raton, Florida > Thank you for the input everyone. I E mailed Vans and Bill B also recomended the shims under the nut plates . This seems like the best solution to me so I'm off to the shop to make some shims. See ya. Dave Bergh RV6 elevator Mtn Home, ID ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HAWKBUD(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: True Love
LOOK OUT FOR NUMBER 33 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: Heater in 6A
From: wstucklen1(at)juno.com (Frederic W Stucklen)
GV, Would love to have a copy of your AutoCAD drawing. Please send it to FSTUCKLEN(at)HASBRO.COM as this JUNO address woun't take attachements... Thanks, Fred Stucklen RV-6A N925RV (Working on 2'd RV-6A - Chevy Powered!) wstucklen1(at)juno.com > > ><< I do have a pattern for the aileron boot if you need it. Email me >for > an address.. >> > >BTW, Fred, I have turned your hand drawing into a true sized ACAD >drawing and >it's available to anyone who wants it. I could send it as an >attachment if >you have access to AutoCAD for plotting. > >-GV > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: TPhilpin(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: F>I. alternate air
<< I believe this is the case and the reason the have one. Like you mentioned; when using the FAB if something gets caught then it is right there at the filter. In any case I think you are in the same situation regardless of whether you have F.I. or a carb. So I don't think your F.I. installation warrants an alt air door any more than a carb installation. Doesn't mean we shouldn't have them, but I don't know of anyone that has done what you are describing. >> Dave, Also consider blockage due to snow or ice. Is there any necessity for the alternate air to be from outside the engine compartment? How about drawing on the warm pressurized air from within. My old Piper Clipper is set up this way. Tony RV-8 Tail on order ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: Keith Warfield <kpwarfield(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Rudder Hinge Dimentions
Rbz1(at)aol.com wrote: > Does anyone know if there any info on the dimensions to set the rudder hinge > rod ends? > Rich Zeidman RV6A S/N 25224 > Rich,The following worked for me, first time, no repeat trial fitting and adjusting. First, I did the simple math to determine the distance from the rudder spar to the center of both the top and bottom heim joints. After setting these to the calulated dimensions, I used the string method for aligning the center heim joint to the top and bottom ones. Don't forget to use the centering bushing with your string. Hope this helps, Keith Warfield RV-6A (starting Wings) > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: F>I. alternate air
<< 1. The bottom of the fiberglass 'bowl' of the FAB forms the seal around the bottom of the filter element (This is a little different than the FAB-320). The ideal place, then for the alternate air door would be the bottom of the fiberglass 'bowl'. An alternate air door here would provide a path that completely bypasses the normal intake path and the air filter. The only problem is that there is only about 1.75 inched clearance between the bottom of the FAB and the bottom of the scoop. Not a lot of room for a door to open. 2. Put the alternate air door on the back of the FAB's fiberglass 'bowl'. This is less attractive, but probably more workable. So I'm taking a survey, of sorts. I'm asking anyone who is installing or has installed a fuel injected engine to please tell me what you did for an alternate air door. Thanks in advance, Dave Barnhart rv-6 sn 23744 N601DB down to the last 90 percent >> The alternate air supply should bypass the filter. I've always thought that this device was for use when the filter iced over (IFR conditions), or was blocked by some foreign matter. So: if you follow this rule, you will need a supply door to be installed into the bottom plate if the filter assy, and also thru the 'glass bowl. This supply doesn't have to provide FULL power (altho that would be nice!), but it should enable your engine to continue to run. I'd guess that the room below the fab(ulous) air box would be enough. Could you get a large enough hole thru the top plate? Also: If you can, try to design the alt air door to be automatic (spring-loaded or similiar). I'd like to see an indicator lite in this case, so I'd know if it was opening under different than desired situations. Also #2: There have been cases of the door coming loose, and causing engine stoppage. Make that sucker beefy! I'll be working on an -8 w/F.I. after Jan 1, and it will have a similiar system, not yet designed. I'd appreciate any tips you come up with! Check six! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MLaboyteau(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: F>I. alternate air
Hi Dave, I also have an IO-320B1A engine, with the FAB-360 air box. I was able to mount a 2" flange just above the alternate door on the air box. If you want to see some pictures of it just go to http://members.aol.com/mlaboyteau/engine2.htm It doesn't quite cover the whole alternate inlet opening, but it should be enough. Mark LaBoyteaux RV-6A N106RV MLaboyteau(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ken_Hitchmough(at)magic.ca (Ken Hitchmough)
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: F>I. alternate air
Scott, you wrote: "So I don't think your F.I. installation warrants an alt air door any more than a carb installation. . " Actually thats not really true unless you put the carb heat on. I think the tendency is not to include carb heat because of the lower susceptibility of F.I. to icing. The problem is that it is STILL possible for the filter to get blocked with ice and without hot air or alt air, you're screwed. Ken RV6A Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV4Brown(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: Elevator Trim Cover
Three possibilities to consider in attaching the trim plate or nuttplates and screws to any thin material ( there are others ) - Dimple the cover plate. Use a doubler plate thick enough to install a hole large enough to accept the countersink from the cover plate. - They make specialt hardware for this situation. The screw head countersink is much smaller and can be used on thin material without a countersunk nutplate. I purchased hardware from " Genuine Aircraft Hardware" . Seems to me I remember Mr. Barnard also carries some hardware for this situation as well. See the Yellar Pages. I could not find anyone who carried or made a countersunk #6 nutplate - Install shims underneath the nutplate attach rivets to add sufficient depth that you can dimple the doubler plate or just enlarge the hole as in suggestion 1. Hope this helps a little Tom Brown - RV4 - CCCCanopy drillllling !!!! ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Rudder Hinge Dimentions
From: lm4(at)juno.com (Larry Mac Donald)
Date: Dec 02, 1997
><< Does anyone know if there any info on the dimensions to set the rudder hinge rod ends? Go to sheet 6 at the lower left corner and see the plan view of the rudder and stab spars. they are calling spar/spar clearance of 2" at the tip and 1-3/4" at the root. Been there-done that. Larry Mac Donald lm4(at)juno.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: Edward Cole <emcole(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: HVLP Gun
To all who requested the Harbor Freight HVLP spray gun part number, here it is: 35787 HVLP Gravity Spray Gun $59.99 It is a nicely anodized red gun with a gravity fed paint pot complete with regulator. It works well with 10-15 psi at the nozzle. Very little over spray. I honestly use 1/2 of the material I did with the small touch up gun. Ed Cole RV6A Fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: Heater in 6A
<< I saw this on George's video and I was concerned that if there was a exhaust leak it would feed into the heater duct. Is this a 'real' concern? (I haven't mounted my engine yet so I'm not sure if the exhaust pipes get anywhere near the air path.) >> I suppose that there is some additional risk that oil leaks near the cylinder barrel might be burned, producing CO which could enter the ducts if you place them low on the fins, but you probably don't want to allow leaks here, regardless. You are using the exhaust pipe for the heat source, so you must be close to the exhaust system anyway. Get the Vetterman Stainless steel exhaust system, install, maintain and inspect it properly and you should be fine. As a precaution you should also have a CO detector in the cabin, they're cheap insurance. -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: bjnash(at)connectnet.com (BJ Nash)
Subject: Re: Spray Gun
Date: Dec 02, 1997
>> >> I was about to cough up $100 for a HVLP Spray gun when I saw >> Avery's "mini" gun with the paper cup. Has anyone used it? Is >> it as handy as it is avdertised to be? Docken Guns The guns that are plastic must be avoided. I think most peoples experience with them are bad. The metal ones that have a plastic cup holder are fine. the cup can be bent/crimped around the top to hold them on better, but are still in danger of being knocked off while spraying. A heavy rubber band will help if you are going into awkward places. Don't fill them completely if spraying at an angle. The advantage of clean up is very good as not much solvent need be used on the gun and the cup is thrown away after a few uses. The cups are quite expensive if purchased from aircraft supply vendors, but cheap if purchased from a cup supplier. I bel;ieve they are "Sweetheart" 16WNI or 29-294 unwaxed cups. We use them extensively for "quicky" paint jobs as they will do a passible job if some experience is gained in using them, as well as priming. Small cups like one sees in fast food places for ketchup make great measuring cups for small batches of paint especially where something needs to be combined and mixed such as epoxy primer. A old drill (variable speed) with a small mixer attached then makes through mixing right in the Sweetheart cup easy. Send email to infobot(at)pdsig.n2.net for a directory of interesting stuff! ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._ Bill Nash `6_ 6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`) Aircraft Remanufacturing Corp (_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `.``-..-' 1531 Avohill Dr _..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' ,' Vista, Ca 92084 (760) 749 0239 (((),-'' (((),' (((.-' Email: bjnash(at)pdsig.n2.net http://www.freeyellow.com/members/aircraft-reman/index.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mikel(at)dimensional.com
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: First Flight
Hey listers: Kelli and I are happy to announce that on the 24th of November, our RV-4, N232 Suzie Q took to the air for the first time. (My first post didn't make it to the list.) After 6+ years of building, Test Flight #1 went without a hitch. Other than the Right Rudder Blues (I should have offset the vertical another 1/4 inch) it flew like a dream. What a sweet flying airplane! I have never flown an unfamiliar airplane that felt so familiar on the first flight. I stuck to my flight card (except at 2000 rpm it wanted to go 120 mph and my limit for first flight was going to be 100) and flew 45 problem-free minutes, going through the list. Landing (yikes) was no problem (taildragger pilot). Flight testing details to follow as I needed that type of inspiration when I was building (you mean this thing will some day actually FLY??) and to help builders start thinking about what they have to do after the building stops (although it NEVER does). Some preliminary thoughts: *Stay current or get current. 'Nuff said. *Get some time IN TYPE with someone who knows their airplane. This is a great flying airplane but is very different from what you are probably used to. It feels very solid in flight but the difference in control feel when slowed down makes it feel like you are falling out of the air even though the airplane is VERY controlable at slow speeds. Do a bunch of slow flight and stalls during your familiarization flights. Feel the control inputs at different airspeeds: turns, climbs, etc. Don't just fly around. Make slow flight turns at altitude similar to what you would make in a landing approach. *"Fly" your airplane as soon as you can sit in the cockpit. Sound silly? I had a lot of "time" logged just becoming familiar with what the front office felt like and where all the controls/instruments were (I can find everything with my eyes closed). The first flight will be from a place you are familar with which seemed to help A LOT. (Got a lot of strange looks from people who caught me flying in the garage, though). *I applied a "flight attitude indicator" on the canopy (with pinstripe tape) to help identify 1)three-point attitude; 2)level flight attitude; 3)30 degree bank left and right; 4)45 degree banks. I think this really helped. It's hard to guess a bank angle. I knew what level flight attitude was. I knew where tail down attitude was on landing. *Flight cards. I have a plan for every flight I am going to take. The plans will probably change as testing goes along and I may do several cards on one flight but I know what I want to accomplish on every test flight. Also helps with documentation and getting everything done you want to get done. *Don't attract a crowd. I had several people who have followed this project from near inception who wanted to be there for the first flight and I hated to disappoint them but it was suddenly time to fly: good day, no wind, felt right, no distractions. And they all understood (I think, anyway). Enough for now, more later, if this seems helpful. KEEP BUILDING!! Michael N 232 Suzie Q (Flying!!) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mikel(at)dimensional.com
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: I made the decision, I ordered the second
airplane kit ... >Therefore, I placed my order for the RV8A. (after all, how could I pass up VANS >discount for repeat builders ?) . I can't wait to start riveting again ... Scott: Good for you!! Put all those lessons you learned on the first one to good use. But.......what discount for repeat offenders? (NOT that I am thinking of anything, Kelli [my rivet-driving wife]. Just asking. I know: two year hiatus on building.) Michael RV-4 232 Suzie Q ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mikel(at)dimensional.com
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: Installing flaps
>RV-4 builders: While installing my flaps I ran into a problem. The aluminum >plate on the inboard end of each flap scrapes the side of the >fuselage when traveling to the up position. I have measured everything I >can think of; I can't find any deviation from the plans dimensions. Hey, Tom: I ran into the same problem and, if you search the archives, you won't like the answer. I drilled out the outboard rib and reset it inboard about one rib width or so (enough that the old rivet holes did not show). Unfortunatly, this means you will have to drill out the hinge and re-rivet a new half on as this screws up the allignment of the flap with respect to the aileron. I tried everything else first and there was no other option. They fit great after the small modification. I tried the file-the-plate method and countersunk rivets and was still not satisfied with the clearance. I then posted a suggestion: leave the hinge and last rib off until fitting the flap to the wing, wing installed on the aircraft. Good luck; keep building. Michael RV-4 232 Suzie Q ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: "I THINK, THEREFORE YOU ARE" <PKIRKPATRICK(at)FAB9.intel.com>
Subject: FUEL TANK LEAK CHECKING
Greetings, This is a long post but I think its good info for the ones not here yet or just chicken like me. Plus I promised the proseal gods that I would pay hommage if there no leaks in my fuel tanks, I hope this counts. After I built my tanks and finished the wings I kinda pushed them off to the side and decided I would leak check them just before final assy of the wings to the fuse. Last night I finally got the courage up to leak check my fuel tanks. Since my fuse is on hold ( pending a job change mabey ) and everything had been going good all day long I took the plunge. The way I did it is sort of a combo of things I learned here. The whole procedure takes less than an hour assuming no leaks. 1. Tape off the vent lines with duct tape. 2. Tape over the fuel filler holes with duct tape. 3. Get a balloon ( stretch it out or blow it up first ) and put it over the fuel pickup fitting. If you use a smaller ballon it fits tight enough to seal ok. 4. Set the regulator on your air compressor to about 10 PSI (dont panic hear me out). If the 10 PSI isn't enough for the next step, increase it a little and try again. 5. Using one of the blow off guns with the vent holes on the sides, push it against the drain valve so it opens and pull the trigger.The vent holes on the sides of the nozzel will make sure the pressure doesn't get too high in the tank. Most of the air escapes through the holes. Watch the balloon! as soon as it reaches the point where it starts to swell quickly pull the air off. The balloon will continue to fill for a second on the pressure in the tank. * Before the flames start from the above step think about it. Only a slight amount of pressure is getting into the tank to begin with because of the nozzel holes of the blow off gun and the ballon acts as a safety device. It will blow off way before the pressure in tank even starts to flex the skins enough to cause a problem ( remember the g forces these tanks are made to take with much heavire fuel in them). 6. Let it sit a minute and listen for gross leaks. If the balloon is holding its size go to the next step. If not, fix the big leaks. 7. Carry the whole contraption outside, or if the weather is cold to the shower. By the way, the wife loved this one and got a picture of her husband showering with his plane for the log book. I hope it wasn't for the judge. 8. Start spraying down the tank with soapy water mixed in one of those spray bottles you get at K-Mart or steal your daughters. Just look for the bubbles. To make sure everything is working right, you will have some bubbles around the ballon, and duct taped parts. Spray down all of the rivets and end plates (even my permatex #2 around the gaskets and screws didn't leak). 9. If you find a leak, rinse and dry the place then mark it with a sharpie and continue on. When your done rinse the whole thing off with the shower sprayer and dry it with one of the wifes GOOD towels because we don't want to scratch up our shiny new tanks. Take off the duct tape. As for the fuel caps, good luck they are not made to be air tight and I will cross that problem when I put fuel into the tanks and see if it is really a problem. Don't fear the water and soap on the tanks, the pressure from the balloon will keep it out if there is a small leak. I guess I was lucky. I had no leaks on either tank. I am not worthy. Pat Kirkpatrick RV-6A Rio Rancho, NM ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: Heater in 6A
From: ebundy(at)juno.com (Ed Bundy)
>>Place pickup 2" diameter flanges as low as possible on the rear >baffles so the air is already slightly warmed before it gets to the muff. > >I saw this on George's video and I was concerned that if there was a >exhaust leak it would feed into the heater duct. >Is this a 'real' concern? (I haven't mounted my engine yet so I'm not Royce, I wouldn't worry about it. The intake flange is still in the positive pressure area even though it is somewhat close to the exhaust port on the cylinder. Any leak at the exhaust port is on the low pressure side of the cooling air and will flow down and away from the cylinder. I don't see any way the gas leak could fight it's way up past the cooling air into the pressure area of the plenum. Ed Bundy RV6A - first flight 11/20/96 ebundy(at)juno.com - Eagle, ID ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Cafgef(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: More questions
As i was considering the question of which to build, an RV6 or 6A, some other questions came to mind. I know the answers to some of these questions but I wanted to cross check them with other, more wise heads. << Things to ponder ----------------- If a mute swears, does his mother wash his hands with soap? If someone with multiple personalities threatens to kill himself, is it considered a hostage situation? Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled a them would they still grow, only to be troubled and insecure? Isn't it a bit unnerving that doctors call what they do "practice"? Why do they report power outages on TV? What should you do when you see an endangered animal that is eating an endangered plant? Is it possible to be totally partial? Would a fly that loses it wings be called a walk? If the funeral procession is at night, do folks drive with their headlights off? If the cops arrest a mime, do they tell him he has the right to remain silent? Why do people who know the least know it the loudest? When sign makers go on strike, is anything written on their signs? Where do forest rangers go to "get away from it all"? Why isn't there mouse-flavored cat food? If a parsley farmer is sued, can they garnish his wages? If a stealth bomber crashes in a forest, will it make a sound? If a man speaks in the forest and there is no woman to hear him, is he still wrong? If a turtle loses his shell, is it naked or homeless? Why don't sheep shrink when it rains? Should vegetarians eat animal crackers? If vegetarians eat vegetables, what do humanitarians eat? AND MY FAVORITE - What's another word for synonym? Gene francis ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 03, 1997
From: Frank van der Hulst <frankv(at)pec.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Spar Rivets
> Just starting to rivet wing spar -6 rivets at outboard end of wing > spar and using the Avery C tool. I am getting a slight gap (.020") > between the W606A spar and the W606C web. I wonder whether the problem is that your spar is bouncing when you whack the Avery tool? Try weighting the spar and tool so that they can't move. I didn't have any success with the Avery tool, and eventually rivetted the wing using a 5X gun. Can you please email me (or post to the list) the solution to your rivetting problems so that I can add it to the Bunny's Guide. Thanks. Frank. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Noel E Drew <noeldrew(at)iafrica.com>
Subject: Re: RV-List Duckworks landing light
Date: Dec 02, 1997
I have been reading the comments on the Duckworth lights with interest and would like to offer my 2 pence. I will start by saying that I was very happy with the way the kit went together and it gave me a very satisfactory installation. What is not possible however is a smooth joint between the metal skin and the surface of the plexiglas. The plexiglas may be snug against the inside surface but there is still at least a 1/32" step to the outside surface at a point on the airfoil where anything that induces flow separation, particularly outboard, should be avoided. Theory such as this can no doubt play tricks on the imagination but after a smear of silicone glue was used to smooth the top joint, the wing on that side showed less inclination to drop in the stall. Just a thought. Regards, Noel Drew ZU-APF RV6 150 hours and still no others flying in South Africa. noeldrew(at)iafrica.com n As a satisfied user of the Duckworth's light I would like to add my ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 03, 1997
From: Gary Zilik <zilik(at)bewellnet.com>
Subject: Re: Aileron Gap Fairings
I have just finished installing the gap fairing on my left wing and was wondering what you guys thought about gluing the fairings to the top skin instead of rivets. Pro Seal or silicon sealer could be used. Sure would be a lot easier. Gary Zilik RV-6A S/N 22993 tle heat until the oil temp came up. Gary Zilik RV-6A S/N 22993 Finishing wings/starting Fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 03, 1997
From: Gary Zilik <zilik(at)bewellnet.com>
Subject: Re: Spar Rivets
George McNutt wrote: > > Just starting to rivet wing spar -6 rivets at outboard end of wing spar and > using the Avery C tool. I am getting a slight gap (.020") between the W606A > spar and the W606C web. Drilled out rivets and tried again using bolts > through adjacent holes on each side of rivet to hold everything together, > but still not happy with results. > I had the same problem when I used the Avery C tool to mash the big spar rivets. I was working alone and found that the problem was that there was to much rebound of the spar after each blow of the hammer, thus causing the distortion (I think). As I said I did this with no help. I was using 25 lb bags of lead shot as my extra set of hands. Adding a couple more bags to the spar on each side (3bags total each side) of the C tool and a couple on the tool itself worked for me. The lead shot bags really dampen the rebound. I used a 3 pound hammer and it took 3 blows per rivet. I also found that the longer rivets at the root were easier to mash than the shorter ones near the tip. Gary Zilik RV-6A S/N 22993 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: RV Field Lengths
From: ron.taborek(at)flight642.com (RON TABOREK)
Date: Dec 02, 1997
I'd like to add to the comments that I also believe that a field of 700-800 ft is too short for routine operations. Some time ago I did some work on the variability possible in takeoffs and landings by experienced pilots. Landings have a greater variability to them than takeoffs and grass fields have greater variability to them than hard surfaced runways. The way this variability is dealt with is to have a field length much greater than the "best" performance an aircraft can demonstrate. A key question is whether there are obstacles under the takeoff and landing path. Airfield length determinations usually assume there is a 50' obstacle. If there isn't, then this is an allowance for variability. On takeoff, variability comes from altitude, temperature, wind and gusts, runway surface resistance, flap setting, weight, unstick speed, climb speed and pilot reaction time. If you make some effort you can determine the effect of most of these on the takeoff distance, as is done for transport aircraft. The two that are difficult to quantify are runway surface condition and winds if they are gusty crosswinds. While there are instruments to do this conditions can vary from point to point on the grass and soft wet turf has a lot of rolling resistance. To the above you would add the need strict speed discipline. Also an overrun area should be available if, on takeoff, you are not off the ground when you should be. Landings are even more variable. There is of course wind, weight and weather, but the primary factor is approach speed. It should be as low as possible yet still allow for the required landing manoeuvres and gusts. This is usually between 1.22 and 1.3 Vs. RVs seem to approach at more than this, perhaps because the low aspect ratio give high induced drag. Varying speed 10% varies landing distance by 20%, if I recall, Then the steepest approach is used to minimize airborne distance and the aircraft must pass over the obstacle at the required height. A visual approach slope indicator (VASIS) helps to keep on the flight path, even a homemade one. Flares should be as tight as the gear will comfortably accomodate. Full brakes are used, but grass braking friction is unpredictable, especially when wet. Any reaction time delays at 50 mph add about 70 ft to distance. Given the above, for skilled transport pilots, 67% is added to best distance for field length. When all is said and done the best way to determine field length for occasional pilots is to see what people use day to day. Most fields are at least 2000' or so. At 2000' I think I would have a good margin to accomodate the above. At 1500' I'd start paying a lot of attention to the above. At 1000' it would have all my attention! Bear in mind also that flight testing an unfamiliar aircraft with uncalibrated instruments poses extra risks and I would be concerned that even if experienced STOL pilots could use the field, unwise and less experienced pilots might be tempted to do so. I'm sure this is more than anyone wants to know about setting field length, but I hope some of it is helpful. ron.taborek(at)flight642.com RV-4 Installing O-320 Toronto --- { Presentation of the preceding message was made possible by Flight 642 } { BBS. Canada's Aviation and Simulation connection. (905)642-2993 } { WEB Page: http://www.flight642.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: chester razer <razer(at)midwest.net>
Subject: Re: Spar Rivets
Gary Zilik wrote: > > George McNutt wrote: > > > > > > Just starting to rivet wing spar -6 rivets at outboard end of wing > spar and > > using the Avery C tool. I am getting a slight gap (.020") between > the W606A > > spar and the W606C web. Drilled out rivets and tried again using > bolts > > through adjacent holes on each side of rivet to hold everything > together, > > but still not happy with results. > > > > I had the same problem when I used the Avery C tool to mash the big > spar rivets. I > was working alone and found that the problem was that there was to > much rebound of > the spar after each blow of the hammer, thus causing the distortion > (I think). As > I also had the same problem and I used a homemake "armstrong powered" bench squeezer. I worried about it for 3 days and finally called vans thinking I would have to rebuild my wing spars. They said not to worry, it was typical when riveting out toward the end of the wing. My advice is: after you have made a reasonable attempt to clamp the pieces together, and have installed the rivet with a C-frame/hammer or a Big rivet gun/bar or a homemade squeezer, and the rivet sets correctly, don't worry about the slight deformation between the pieces that result in a 0.020" gap. -- Chet Razer razer(at)midwest.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RVator(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: Heater in 6A
Gary Zilik << Is there any good reason that you could not pull heated air off the oil cooler... .... Usually it is necc. to stop the air flow to the oil cooler or at least drastically reduce it during winter months to maintain oil temps. So this is most likely not an option. Steve Schmitz ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: "I THINK, THEREFORE YOU ARE" <PKIRKPATRICK(at)FAB9.intel.com>
Subject: Small paint/primer jobs
I have to jump in and give my 2 cents on the small primer jobs. I've been using a middle of the line badger air brush. They run about $60 and come with a couple of glass jars with lids. They are easy to use and take about 2 minutes to clean up. If you are using a primer which has a decent pot life (variprime is 2 weeks in the refrigerator) just put a lid on the jar and store it. to clean the airbrush, I have a 2 oz jar filled with acetone and I just spray a little through the gun to clean the needle when I am finished. Don't worry too much about buildup on the air chamber as long as the airbrush still works. I dissaemble the airbrush every few weeks (takes less than a minute) and leave the parts in acetone until I am ready to use it again. Putting it back together and adjusting it only takes a few minutes. Use the number 5 tip and needle which comes with the kit. This works great and is controllable enough to touch up scratches without getting primer everywhere once the pieces are rivited together. To mix up the primer after it has been sitting for a while, let the jar warm up and shake it until it is well mixed. I set my air compressor regulator to between 20 and 40 PSI depending on the amount of primer I want to deliver. Another trick is to use a Q-Tip to touch up scratches straight from the jar of stored primer. You can also get different sizes jars up to about 4 ounces from any good hobby store. Just my .02 worth, Pat Kirkpatrick ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: First Flight
<< Hey listers: Kelli and I are happy to announce that on the 24th of November, our RV-4, N232 Suzie Q took to the air for the first time. >> YES-S-S-S-S-S-S!!! I'll bet that grin couldn't be removed with a hammer & chisel. Congratulations. "Amazing. It DOES fly!" ...And you change from sheetmetal worker to crewchief, and switch between crewchief & pilot. At least, the crewchief knows exactly what to fix after the test flights. It sounds like your test program will be above average. Check six! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: halk(at)sybase.com (Hal Kempthorne)
Subject: Re: RV Field Lengths
Hi all, When my Debonair was based at Palo Alto, I regularly turned off at the first exit which was 600 feet from the threshold. PAO is altitude 5 I believe tho the saltwater has flooded the runway at times. Note I say regularly, not always. Seriously, with all the Chevy installations out there, isn't anyone disappointed with theirs to want to sell it? Hal Kempthorne RV-6AQ -- WANTED TO BUY - a used Chevy V-6 setup. halk(at)sybase.com Santa Clara, CA. Debonair N6134V @ SJC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Persyk" <dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Spar Rivets
Date: Dec 02, 1997
---------- > From: George McNutt <GMcNutt(at)compuserve.com> > To: RV-LIST > Subject: RV-List: Spar Rivets > Date: Tuesday, December 02, 1997 1:49 AM > > > Just starting to rivet wing spar -6 rivets at outboard end of wing spar and > using the Avery C tool. I am getting a slight gap (.020") between the W606A > spar and the W606C web. > George McNutt, Langley BC > -6A wing spars I also had slight gaps in my W606C and W606A. I used a pneumatic squeezer and a good clamping system. I was able to insert 0.003 and 0.004 feeler gauge leaves all the way in to the rivet stem at a total 7 different rivets in the two wing spars. This is unacceptable by MIL-R-47196A(MI) 4.2.1.g, and all commonly published guides to riveting defects. I called Builder's Assistance and Van himself later called me back owing to the potentially dangerous structural weakening of the spar. Van allowed that somehow the geometry of the spar causes these gaps to occur in some instances. He said that he did not approve of such gaps but that they were probably OK in view of my measurements. That week (6-26-95) I saw two postings of the problem on AOL's RV Forum. I then measured a couple of spars of fellow builders and noted the same gaps. I believe many builders have these gaps but are not aware of them. A 0.020 gap is huge! Dennis 6A fuselage roll bar Barrington, IL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: Mike Wills <willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil>
Subject: chevy V6
If the Chevy setup is the bargain priced alternative to Lycoming that OMABP, Richard Finch, etc... claim it to be, why do you need to find a used one? When I first investigated the Belted Air package (about 1 1/2 years ago) price was quoted as "around $7000". Last price I heard was $10,000 to $11,000. Has anyone on the list bought this package, and does anyone know what the real price is? Mike Wills RV-4 (wings done, although it sounds like I may be rebuilding the root end of my flaps;saving for fuse) willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil > >Hi all, >Seriously, with all the Chevy installations out there, isn't anyone disappointed >with theirs to want to sell it? > >Hal Kempthorne RV-6AQ -- WANTED TO BUY - a used Chevy V-6 setup. >halk(at)sybase.com Santa Clara, CA. Debonair N6134V @ SJC ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: First Flight
From: tcraig-stearman(at)juno.com (John T. Craig-Stearman)
Date: Dec 02, 1997
> >Hey listers: Kelli and I are happy to announce that on the 24th of >November, >our RV-4, N232 Suzie Q took to the air for the first time. Congratulations, Michael! Keep those first flight postings coming to motivate the rest of us. >I have never flown an unfamiliar airplane that felt >so >familiar on the first flight. My sentiments exactly. I have flown two RV-4s, two RV-6s, and two RV-3s. Each felt like an old friend from the first moment. I can't say that about any other airplane. Regards, Tom Craig-Stearman tcraig-stearman(at)juno.com RV-4 messing with the inboard flap ends >:-( ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Persyk" <dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: 6A Cabin Frame Screws
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Drawing 39 section A-A' shows a pair of 8R8 and 10R10 screws in the lower cabin frame (roll bar) attachment. Why are the 8R8 screws tapped? It seems to me that there is room for a nut or a nutplate. Dennis 6A fuselage cabin frame Barrington, IL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: halk(at)sybase.com (Hal Kempthorne)
Subject: Re: chevy V6 installation (for sale??)
Mike wrote: > If the Chevy setup is the bargain priced alternative to Lycoming that OMABP, > Richard Finch, etc... claim it to be, why do you need to find a used one? Well, see if we can figure this out. Suppose a new Chevy V6 installation is $12000. Suppose that I buy a used one from someone who (if there be such a person on the planet!) is not happy with his setup and wants to sell it for $6000. Suppose it has less than 100 hours on it from new. How much would I save? I might actaully tear the engine down just to be sure it is okay. I'm very safety conscious even tho I am a kind of experimental guy, willing and ready to hear all sides and try to be rational in evaluating what is said. I'd certainly tear down a used Lycoming and I wouldn't take one at all that came from a junkyard, even an airplane junkyard. How would I ever know if the rods or crank have reached their fatigue life? My idea is to spend about $6000 - maybe more, instead of $28,000 or even $12000. I can completely overhaul the Chevy for under $1000 too. New pistons, rings, valves, springs, lifters, camshaft, oil pump, water pump, and on and on! The Chevy setup may not work out for me but I have many friends who do not believe that homemade airplanes will work out either. Maybe I won't sell my Debonair. Then again, maybe I'll put a Corvette V8 in it. Brand new, 350HP for under $4000. Hal Kempthorne RV-6AQ -- WANTED TO BUY - a used Chevy V-6 setup. halk(at)sybase.com Santa Clara, CA. Debonair N6134V @ SJC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: "les williams" <lesliebwilliams(at)classic.msn.com>
Subject: Installing flaps
Tom, I believe it was Tim Lewis who posted a procedure which I had also used on my first RV-6A as this glitch is not limited to the -4. You can gain at least an eighth inch by changing the spacers on the aileron to move it outboard and then relocate the flap hinge to move the flap outboard also. Of course you will also run into a couple of other problems if you plan to do this. First, if you have already drilled the flap hinge, you will need another hinge half. The push rod hole may have to be enlarged and the push rod adjusted a little. And you will need to change the tip to aileron gap clearance if the tip is already mounted at the proper spacing. Even after that I had to file down one side of the flap attachment to keep it from rubbing the side. For those who have not completed the flaps for either the -4 or -6/-6A (don't know about the -8), it would be wise to not drill the outboard flap rib to either the skin or spar nor to drill the flap hinge until the wings have been fitted on the fuselage. You can then shorten the flap as needed to fit without interference. I know many of the -4 builders who have done this. Surprised that it hasn't been on the list before. My QB flaps were already drilled and riveted, so I didn't have that option. If the flap skins are prepunched in the new kits, then this is obviously not possible to do on those either. Les Williams/RV-6AQ/Tacoma WA Craig-Stearman) RV-4 builders, While installing my flaps on the airplane I ran into a problem. The aluminum plate on the inboard end of each flap scrapes the side of the fuselage when traveling to the up position. I have measured everything I can think of, flap width, aileron to flap gap, etc., and I can't find any deviation from the plans dimensions. Has anyone else run into this problem? If so, how did you correct it? Thanks, Tom Craig-Stearman tcraig-stearman(at)juno.com RV-4 complete airframe now! Engine next. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: chester razer <razer(at)midwest.net>
Subject: Re: 6A Cabin Frame Screws
Dennis Persyk wrote: > > > Drawing 39 section A-A' shows a pair of 8R8 and 10R10 screws in the > lower > cabin frame (roll bar) attachment. > Why are the 8R8 screws tapped? It seems to me that there is room for > a nut > or a nutplate. > > Dennis 6A fuselage cabin frame > Barrington, IL Dennis, I asked myself the same question at that point in building. I believe the #8 screws are not structural and only hold the skin in place. When you stop and think about it a threaded hole is just as good as a nutplate or nut, just needs a little something on it to keep the threads tight. If you can get a nut or nutplate in that location I dont see any reason not to. -- Chet Razer razer(at)midwest.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Tedd McHenry <tedd(at)idacom.hp.com>
Subject: Re: First Flight
Date: Dec 02, 1997
> > > *"Fly" your airplane as soon as you can sit in the cockpit. Sound silly? I > had a lot of "time" logged just becoming familiar with what the front office > felt like and where all the controls/instruments were (I can find everything > with my eyes closed). The first flight will be from a place you are familar > with which seemed to help A LOT. (Got a lot of strange looks from people who > caught me flying in the garage, though). I agree wholeheartedly. "Visualizing" is a well-known training technique in sports. I encouraged all of my flying students to visualize flying--in detail--for an hour every day. I suspect few of them actually did it, but the best ones did. Also, a "blind flying" test--finding all the controls with your eyes covered--is a really good idea. Tedd McHenry Surrey, BC [-6 tail] ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: Will Cretsinger <cretsinger(at)startext.net>
Subject: Re: FUEL TANK LEAK CHECKING
> After I built my tanks and finished the wings I kinda pushed them off to the > side and decided I would leak check them just before final assy of the wings > to the fuse. For another method of testing fuel tanks for leaks, see my Wing Construction Notes parked behind the red RV-6A at http://www.flash.net/~gila Will Cretsinger RV-6A Tilt canopy now drilled but not fastened ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: "joseph.wiza" <joe(at)mcione.com>
Subject: Re: Duckworks landing lights
The lens purchased conformed to the outside radius. I heated the lens in hot tap water and decreased the radius to conform to the inside. (very little at a time) ---------- > From: AB320FLYER(at)aol.com > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: Duckworks landing lights > Date: Monday, December 01, 1997 10:18 AM > > > Joe, > I used the Duckworks lights and as the instructions mentioned, I ground down > the backs of the two plastic retainer strips that hold the lens in the > original lights, to hold the lights in their brackets. I think they look > better than the washers. The washers that are used to attach the brackets to > the ribs worked out fine. The only complaint I have is that the plexi lens > don't conform very well to the shape of the leading edge. I used the > strapping tape to pull the lens into the the opening but there were still > some gaps. Does anyone have an idea on how to improve the fit? > > > >Has anyone installed these lights in the wings?Following the instructions I > > > used the template to cut out the holes in the wing. After this point > > > things became hazy. Oversized flat washers with counter sunk bolts just > > > dont make sense. > > > > Joel Harding RV-8 ab320flyer(at)aol.com > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Rozendaal" <dougr(at)netins.net>
Subject: Re: F>I. alternate air
Date: Nov 28, 1997
My -4 Has an IO-320 with Bendix. It has no air filter. Just a "U" shaped duct that runs from the intake hole which has some fine mesh on it into the U duct and there is a hinged door on the back with a weak magnet that holds it shut. If it were to open it would swing shut again and auto reset. I think this is a Pitts design. If you have a filter the alt air needs to be downstream of the filter. If you could find a small area that you could open up a small door and spring load it or use a magnet.... DO NOT skip the alternate air! I had a Cassutt type with an Ellison and no alt air. I swallowed a crepe paper ribbon (loooong story) and "rented the farm". Tailwinds, Doug Rozendaal dougr(at)petroblend.com www.petroblend.com/dougr ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: Dr John Cocker <jcocker(at)medhumor.com>
Subject: Re: First Flight
Congratulations, that great feeling only comes a few times per lifetime, so treasure it. A agree with the familiarity when flying the RV for the first timw. Maybe it comes from sitting in the cockpit so long before the first flight. The other thing I have not seen commented upon, it that the RV becomes very stable when a foot or so off the ground. My theory is that the wing is so low, that with flaps, the ground effect makes the wing almost self levelling. Has anyone else noticed this - or am I a hot shot ? (Unlikely the latter) John (107 hours since July) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: Will Cretsinger <cretsinger(at)startext.net>
Subject: Re: Spar Rivets
George McNutt wrote: > > > Just starting to rivet wing spar -6 rivets at outboard end of wing spar and > using the Avery C tool. I recommend renting the factory squeezer from Van...less noise and I suspect it would solve your problem and give beautiful shop heads. Will Cretsinger Arlington, TX RV-6A CANOPY ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: Aileron Gap Fairings
<< I have just finished installing the gap fairing on my left wing and was wondering what you guys thought about gluing the fairings to the top skin instead of rivets. Pro Seal or silicon sealer could be used. Sure would be a lot easier. >> But if it came loose and jammed your aileron, it could really ruin your day. IMO not worth the risk. -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: FUEL TANK LEAK CHECKING
Date: Dec 02, 1997
> >Greetings, > >This is a long post but I think its good info for the ones not here yet or just >chicken like me. Plus I promised the proseal gods that I would pay hommage if >there no leaks in my fuel tanks, I hope this counts. >7. Carry the whole contraption outside, or if the weather is cold to the > shower. By the way, the wife loved this one and got a picture of her > husband showering with his plane for the log book. I hope it wasn't for the > judge. > EGADS!! What a sight!! Hey, Pat...PUHLLLEEEASE promise me I won't find the pic on the bathroom bulletin... >8. Start spraying down the tank with soapy water mixed in one of those spray > bottles you get at K-Mart or steal your daughters. Just look for the bubbles. Uh, steal your daughters? Hmm...got one of my own...too expensive. ;) >As for the fuel caps, good luck they are not made to be air tight and I will >cross that problem when I put fuel into the tanks and see if it is really a >problem. I'll try not to fly over yer house when I'm inverted...don't wanna rain avgas on the lawn... >Pat Kirkpatrick >RV-6A Rio Rancho, NM Thanks for the info, Pat..I'll archive your technique for my turn in the Proseal hotseat. I'm fitting the wing skins now, the jig came out very nice...all wood, and the plumb lines haven't budged...even after bonking my noggin into a support arm....NOT fun. If you find yourself in DIRE need of bucking rivets...you KNOW where I live...*grin* ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: Installing flaps
From: bstobbe(at)juno.com (Bruce D Stobbe)
On Tue, 2 Dec 97 01:32:03 UT "les williams" writes: snip >on my first RV-6A as this glitch is not limited to the -4. You can >gain at least an eighth inch by changing the spacers on the aileron to move it >outboard and then relocate the flap hinge to move the flap outboard >also. Of course you will also run into a couple of other problems if you plan >to do this. First, if you have already drilled the flap hinge, you will >need another hinge half. The push rod hole may have to be enlarged and the Great, since my flaps were built to the plans and finished, including fitting to the wings, a long time ago I guess I can look forward to this fun experience down the road... This is the kind of thing that makes it hard to face the cold garage after work. Bruce Stobbe fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tim Lewis" <timrv6a(at)earthlink.net>
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Painting Gear Legs Before Fiberglassing?
Listers, It's time to put my RV-6A up on it's gear. Before I do that, I think I have a couple of other jobs to do first, but I want to get opinions from the list: 1. I think I need to remove the gear bracket (the weldment inside the cockpit that holds the end of the gear legs) and paint it now so I have paint between the weldment and the fuselage (corrosion protection). The weldment is factory primed. Should I rough it up, prime it again, and then paint it? If not, what's a good procedure? 2. I think I need to paint the landing gear legs at this point as well. Soon I'll be attaching the wood stiffener and fairings, and I don't think the factory primer is sufficient corrosion protection in the long run. I'm planning to use a white epoxy spray paint (from hardware store cans probably). I don't care about an exact color match with my final paint (not selected yet) because the gear will be covered by fiberglass and fairings. My plan is to rough up the existing primer, prime it again (rustoleum), then hit it with the white epoxy. Any comments or ideas? Thanks, Tim Lewis STILL unpacking from the move to VA, gotta get back to work on the plane!!! ------------------------------------ Tim Lewis N47TD (reserved) RV-6AQ #60023 Springfield VA timrv6a(at)earthlink.net or timrv6a(at)iname.com ------------------------------------ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 03, 1997
From: "Anthony Self" <CHEVY_TRUCK(at)classic.msn.com>
Subject: Grass runways???
I made the original post a few days ago and thought the list was down. I did reply to some of you off-list, but I thought I'd say thanks for all the advice to everyone else at once. Well, the overwhelming opinion has been that a 1000 ft. strip isn't really long enough. Although, there are a few brave ones out there. Another big problem with my land is that there are electric lines on both sides, so I am quickly giving up on the idea of my own strip and hangar at home. Even with a neighbor giving me an easement, I still have those power lines in the way. Whose crazy idea was it to string all that wire up there in our way? Unless, I can get the electric company to come out and bury all the lines (fat chance of that), guess I'm stuck with $50/month for an outdoor spot at the airport. Thanks for the advice. Anthony K. Self CHEVY_TRUCK(at)MSN.COM Hopefull starting RV6A this spring! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Subject: Re: Heater in 6A
<348511DD.EA27DCA3(at)bewellnet.com>
From: rvpilot(at)juno.com (William R. Davis Jr)
Hi Gary There was an article about using the oil cooler for cabin heat in a recent RVator. It motivated me to try it on my 4. Tried it for the first time last week on a trip to NJ with the Temp. in the 30's. It worked great, It's a nice soft heat, not scorching like exhaust heat but I would think that most drafts would have to be eliminated as they are in my bird. One note: It's a lot easier to do this when building the plane than it is to retrofit it later. It sure eliminates any worries about CO from the heat muff. Bill Davis RV4 N66WD ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "MoeJoe" <moejoe(at)bellatlantic.net>
Subject: Re: COMPRESSED AIR LINE/NOISE REDUCERS
Date: Oct 18, 1997
charset="us-ascii" Try thin diameter PVC. I know, it may sound crazy, but I have it running through my Paper Recycling plant. I have a whole network of the stuff running through the ceiling, carrying air as far a 300 ft to the back room, and everywhere in between. It doesn't leak, even after about 5 years, and there is no noticable pressure loss. I am running a huge compressor (30hp), but even a small compressor should do the trick in a garage. You could have a few attach points, so you don't have to drag hose all over the place to do different things. As far as I know, my maintenance guy used regular PVC glue. I'll find out on Monday. Maurice Colontonio Cherry Hill, NJ > > I am in the final stages of finishing my garage and need advice what >type of air lines to install. I like to have 3 outlets (each side and in >the ceiling {9 ft high}). Aprx. 50 ft total line. > I understand rubber hoses are cheap and easy to install. > Metal tubing requires considderable more work (pipe cutting and >threating) and are expensive. > What is the longevity of rubber vs tubing? >What size tubing is normally used? Is there significant pressure loss with >a standard rubber hose? > I have a Sears 3.5 (15 gl) oilfree (= NOISY) compressor which I will >located outside (in a little enclosure or shed) to reduce noise. Any >experience with type of lining for compressor shed? WouId egg cartons >(linig the inside walls of the compressor shed) work? > >Thanks in advance for your input! >Safe and happy landings -ALWAYS! > >Lothar* K.|| Denver, CO || NOW finishing FLUGHAUS (=carriagehouse) >|| loocking for RV- 6 JIG || ready to jig soon ||| *(pron'd: "low-TARR") > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Pmartin Compaq" <Pmartin(at)gbonline.com>
Subject: rv8 empennage tips and fuel tank senders
Date: Dec 02, 1997
my name is dick martin. I am new to computers but am experienced in building airplanes. I am building an rv8 and have completed the empennage, wings, and am now well along on construction of the fuselage. I had spare time while waitning for my wing kit, so i built formed aluminum tips for the empennage. Persons interested in this technique,please contact me for info. I was dissatisfied with the current offerings of fuel gauges and senders. I wanted to use and Electronics Int. FL-2c instrument but i did not like the resistance senders because they are never accurate. With the help of the engineers at Electronics Int. we have designed a capacitance type fuel level sender that is simple and is super accurate and can be built for about 20.00. I am building my rv8 light and i already have obtained an lycoming IO360A1B6 engine. I hope to give Dave Anders a run for his money. I may be reached by phone at 920 432 4845 mornings cst time only. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Craig Nelson <cgn(at)pond.net>
Subject: wing spar rivets
Date: Dec 02, 1997
Dear Fellow Listers, After reading all the postings on the riveting problems of the main wing spars, I had to go to my shop and look at my wing spars. I was looking for the .020 gaps that were being described. I did not find any and I really did not think I had any to begin with. I had never heard anything about these gaps and was surprised to read about them. I built my own spars and thought they came out very well. I also used the "caveman method" of setting # 6 rivets with the Avery "C" frame tool and a four pound single jack. The procedures that was not mentioned in any of the postings, was bolting the spar together with the AN bolts provided in the wing kit and "you provide" temporary nuts. I also want to mention that the # 6 rivets provided in the kit were not all the correct length. I had to cut to size many of the # 6 rivets to get an EXACT one and one half times the diameter length on the rivets. I used dial indicating calipers to get an exact length on the rivets. I have found that unless these rivets were to an exact length there is a possibilty for trouble in setting these rivets. Another possible cause for these gaps might be in not jigging the spar straight before setting the rivets. Make sure the spar is straight before setting the rivets. I hope my experience will help another builder, who is thinking about how he or she might rivet the main spar together. P.S. I made perfect shop heads as measured with the Avery rivet guages in there catalog. Craig Nelson RV-6 serial # 25101 cgn(at)pond.net Eugene, OR left wing finished, skinning right wing ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: Thomas Velvick <rver(at)caljet.com>
Subject: Re: chevy V6
> >If the Chevy setup is the bargain priced alternative to Lycoming that OMABP, >Richard Finch, etc... claim it to be, why do you need to find a used one? >When I first investigated the Belted Air package (about 1 1/2 years ago) >price was quoted as "around $7000". Last price I heard was $10,000 to >$11,000. Has anyone on the list bought this package, and does anyone know >what the real price is? I thought that I read somewhere that the Chevy Vortac block that is commonly used isn't available new anymore. The new Chevy Vortec block are set at 90 degrees instead of 60 degrees (or maybe vice-versa) You also have to replace the stock cam with a marine use cam. At Copperstate, I talked to Jess and he said that the firewall forward package for the RV-6a was not available yet, but should be in early 1998. Regards, Tom Velvick rver(at)caljet.com rv-6a wings ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 03, 1997
From: "Anthony Self" <CHEVY_TRUCK(at)classic.msn.com>
Subject: chevy V6 installation (for sale??)
>My idea is to spend about $6000 - maybe more, instead of $28,000 or >even $12000. >I can completely overhaul the Chevy for under $1000 too. New pistons, >rings, >valves, springs, lifters, camshaft, oil pump, water pump, and on and on! > >The Chevy setup may not work out for me but I have many friends who do >not >believe that homemade airplanes will work out either. Maybe I won't sell >Hal Kempthorne Hal, I too want a Chevy setup and found a body shop locally that had two take-out 1997 Vortec V-6 engines. They were both low miles and were not harmed in the wrecked cars. The guy wanted $1400 each, which sounded a little high to me, so I called the Chevrolet Parts Dept. They said you can buy a brand new Vortec long block, everything except intake, from the dealer for $1600-$1800, depending on it's original application. That's still a lot of money, but you know what you're getting this way. I plan on taking this route, and then find an aftermarket fuel injection and ignition system, or possibly buy the rest of the stuff from Belted Air Products. I think you can still come out of it all with a brand new engine and still make it all fly for around $5000 -$6000. Just my opinion though, but I'd like to hear other peoples Chevy ideas. Anthony K. Self CHEVY_TRUCK(at)MSN.COM RV6A Someday...still dreamin' ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Gibson Allan <Allan.Gibson(at)wmc.com.au>
Subject: COMPRESSED AIR LINE/NOISE REDUCERS
Date: Dec 03, 1997
Check the piping as some PVC tubing (drainage piping) is not rated for 1MPa (120psi) and could rupture at line pressure. (VERY LOUD) Use PVC water supply pipe and you will get away with it as most of this is rated for 2MPa (240psi) or just about anything else rated for water line pressures (Polypropylene is also common). Note with larger piping you can get away with a smaller tank on the compressor but you will need to watch any leakage. Supply line taps should go upwards out of the header to knockout any moisture entrained in the air. ---------- From: MoeJoe[SMTP:moejoe(at)bellatlantic.net] Sent: Sunday, October 19, 1997 3:37 Subject: Re: RV-List: COMPRESSED AIR LINE/NOISE REDUCERS Try thin diameter PVC. I know, it may sound crazy, but I have it running through my Paper Recycling plant. I have a whole network of the stuff running through the ceiling, carrying air as far a 300 ft to the back room, and everywhere in between. It doesn't leak, even after about 5 years, and there is no noticable pressure loss. I am running a huge compressor (30hp), but even a small compressor should do the trick in a garage. You could have a few attach points, so you don't have to drag hose all over the place to do different things. As far as I know, my maintenance guy used regular PVC glue. I'll find out on Monday. Maurice Colontonio Cherry Hill, NJ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 03, 1997
From: Frank van der Hulst <frankv(at)pec.co.nz>
Subject: Wing spar rivet press and 5point harness plans
> I built my own spars and thought they came out very well. I also used > the "caveman method" of > setting # 6 rivets with the Avery "C" frame tool and a four pound > single jack. For those not wanting to pound in the #6 rivets, I have a copy of some plans for a press which were sent to me at one time. They're available at <http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Hangar/4809/sparpre21.gif>. Disclaimer: I haven't tried this press myself. Also at the same site is 5ptr3.gif (someone's plans for the 5th point needed for a 5-point harness). Neither of these are my plans. I know I got them off the Net somewhere, but can't recall where. If someone wants credit, drop me a line and I'll be happy to acknowledge them. Frank. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Gibson Allan <Allan.Gibson(at)wmc.com.au>
Subject: Heater in 6A
Date: Dec 03, 1997
Just watch any oil leaks, I hope you included a drain. ---------- From: rvpilot(at)juno.com[SMTP:rvpilot(at)juno.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 1997 1:04 Subject: Re: RV-List: Heater in 6A Hi Gary There was an article about using the oil cooler for cabin heat in a recent RVator. It motivated me to try it on my 4. Tried it for the first time last week on a trip to NJ with the Temp. in the 30's. It worked great, It's a nice soft heat, not scorching like exhaust heat but I would think that most drafts would have to be eliminated as they are in my bird. One note: It's a lot easier to do this when building the plane than it is to retrofit it later. It sure eliminates any worries about CO from the heat muff. Bill Davis RV4 N66WD ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rvator97(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 03, 1997
Subject: Re: First Flight
Michael: CONGRATULATIONS!!! Please keep these type of postings coming.There are alot of us out here who are getting real close to that first flight and would appreciate all the info you can provide. Walt RV-6A ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 03, 1997
From: Frank van der Hulst <frankv(at)pec.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Returned mail: User unknown
Pmartin(at)gbonline.com wrote: > senders. I wanted to use and Electronics Int. FL-2c instrument but i did > not like the resistance senders because they are never accurate. With the > help of the engineers at Electronics Int. we have designed a capacitance > type fuel level sender that is simple and is super accurate and can be > built for about 20.00. Wow! This sounds great. Do you have any more information on these? Is Electronics Int. on the Net? Who do write to to get a pair? Frank. PS: I tried emailing Pmartin directly, but it bounced (user unknown). Are you there, Pmartin? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Robert Acker" <r.acker(at)thegrid.net>
Subject: Re: Aileron Gap Fairings
Date: Dec 02, 1997
> << I have just finished installing the gap fairing on my left wing and was > wondering > what you guys thought about gluing the fairings to the top skin instead of > rivets. > Pro Seal or silicon sealer could be used. Sure would be a lot easier. >> > > But if it came loose and jammed your aileron, it could really ruin your day. > IMO not worth the risk. > > -GV My thoughts exactly, especially since its not that hard to do (taking about 1 hour per wing to drill/dimple/rivet in place). Rob. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Small paint/primer jobs
From: smcdaniels(at)juno.com (SCOTT R MCDANIELS)
Date: Dec 03, 1997
I entirely agree and prefer an airbrush for this type of priming/painting. Another advantage is when you start priming and painting parts made with small diam. tubing such as the motor mount, canopy frame, RV-6A main gear weldments , etc. you waste very little paint and make less of a mess because it can be adjusted to a very small spray pattern for use on the tubing. Scott McDaniels N64SD / RV-6A 560+ Hrs. These ideas and opinions are my own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of my employer. These ideas and opinions are my own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of my employer. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Gibson Allan <Allan.Gibson(at)wmc.com.au>
Subject: Heater in 6A
Date: Dec 03, 1997
Just a little word about pressure and leaks from an industrial instrument engineer. The pressure differential would be insufficient to exclude exhaust gasses from the ducts. As an example I have worked on medium pressure ultra high purity nitrogen systems ( ~ 2MPa) that were contaminated by pinhole leaks, that would produce one bubble in 10 seconds, from the ambient air working back into the line. The contamination levels were of the order of 100PPM, normal levels <0.1PPM. The molecular weight (and size) of Carbon Monoxide is smaller so the effect would be even more noticeable. I hope you are doing two important things: 1. Pressure testing your exhaust system in the muff area (with Helium for preference but air will do). No leakage is acceptable. 2. Using a Carbon Monoxide warning tag. ---------- From: ebundy(at)juno.com[SMTP:ebundy(at)juno.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 1997 4:11 Subject: Re: RV-List: Heater in 6A >>Place pickup 2" diameter flanges as low as possible on the rear >baffles so the air is already slightly warmed before it gets to the muff. > >I saw this on George's video and I was concerned that if there was a >exhaust leak it would feed into the heater duct. >Is this a 'real' concern? (I haven't mounted my engine yet so I'm not Royce, I wouldn't worry about it. The intake flange is still in the positive pressure area even though it is somewhat close to the exhaust port on the cylinder. Any leak at the exhaust port is on the low pressure side of the cooling air and will flow down and away from the cylinder. I don't see any way the gas leak could fight it's way up past the cooling air into the pressure area of the plenum. Ed Bundy RV6A - first flight 11/20/96 ebundy(at)juno.com - Eagle, ID - -+ - -+ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WBWard(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 03, 1997
<< it is STILL possible for the filter to get blocked with ice and without hot air or alt air, you're screwed. >> Who flies a light airplane in conditions so bad, that an air filter can get blocked with ice? Seems to me, that one might consider such adverse conditions, as a good signal not to go airborne. Isn't it said, that the instruction necessary to get an instrument rating, is basically designed to teach pilots that they shouldn't fly into conditions like that? Regards Wendell WBWard(at)AOL.COM ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 02, 1997
From: jelford(at)TRANSPORT.COM (Jon Elford)
Subject: Re: Chevy V6 Installation
I have been following the debate on the Chevy V6 installations, and must offer my piece. I have worked for a prominent Chevrolet dealer as a journeyman technician for the last 9 yrs. I don't think there's anything you could say to convince me that leaving terra-firma in an aircraft powered by a Chevrolet 4.3 liter V6 is a good idea. At least I hope you're talking about the 4.3 and not the 2.8. You ought to be commited if you're speaking of the latter. :-) I am not saying that the 4.3 is a bad engine, because it's not. It is a fine mill FOR A TRUCK!! It is a smooth running engine with counterbalance shafts and the like, makes good power and is fairly compact. But it is not without faults. In a Blazer or Pickup, an oil pump failure or a spun rod or main bearing is a pain in the neck and a week without your vehicle. In an aircraft (especially one you just sold out the previous 5 years of your life to create) it is a MUCH larger problem. Possibly deadly... I look at the pile of failed engine parts (and complete engines) in our warranty return that resulted in a complete loss of power (ie: in on the hook) and the thought of going airborne with that engine makes me shudder. And I am talking about engines anywhere from brand new (0 miles) and up. I am also not saying that Lycomings are immune to these things, but aircraft engines are designed, built and assembled knowing that lives are on the line with every revolution of the crankshaft. GM mass produces engines designed specifically for "gravity bound" vehicles, and takes into account that some will inevitably fail and need replacement-even with very low miles (hours). An aircraft engine is stressed far less than an automobile engine as well. Take an O-360 (360 cu. in.) with 180 horsepower; 1 horsepower per 2 cubic inches. A 4.3 Vortec (265 cu. in.) with better than 200 hp; nearly 1 hp per cu. in. I have a snowmobile that puts out as much hp as an O-320 with only 680 cc's. It's small and very light, but I would never consider flying it. It's too highly stressed!! I know I've spent an entire page preaching like a know-it-all. I would be the first to admit it if proven wrong. I guess I just agree with Van's statement that "the best conversion for an RV is to convert $8000 into a used good used Lycoming aircraft engine." By the way, a Chevy truck IS an outstanding product with an unparalleled warranty.... Jon Elford RV-6A #25201 Finally a finished horizontal stab!!!! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Gibson Allan <Allan.Gibson(at)wmc.com.au>
Date: Dec 03, 1997
index ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JamesCone(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 03, 1997
Subject: Re: Heater in 6A
I tapped off of the front of the baffles on the inlet ramp so as to reduce the possibility of getting bad air into the cockpit. I made the piccolo tubes by taking a piece of .016 aluminum and making it into a tube 2 inches in diameter. I drilled 1/2 holes for the outlets all along the tube, top and bottom. This spreads the air out a lot. Jim Cone RV-6A flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JamesCone(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 03, 1997
Subject: Lost subscriber
Does anyone on the list know how to contact Dennis Jaynes of Trumann, AR? The last E-mail address that I have for him goes unanswered. Thanks, Jim Cone jamescone(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 03, 1997
From: George McNutt <GMcNutt(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: Spar Rivets
Gentlemen - Thank You for your replies. Based on replacing five rivets I believe my wing spar & web gap problem is solved and I like the results so much that I am going to replace the rest of the rivets that I had considered acceptable. - This long post is for those who have not riveted their wing spars and may find the information useful. My origional posting below outlines the problem - ------------------------------------------------- Just starting to rivet wing spar -6 rivets at outboard end of wing spar and using the Avery C tool. I am getting a slight gap (.020") between the W606A spar and the W606C web. Drilled out rivets and tried again using bolts through adjacent holes on each side of rivet to hold everything together, but still not happy with results. Plans and pictures included with instructions show the -6 rivets facing aft in the wing spar, this puts the factory head on the thinest piece of material - and goes against the rule to put factory head on the thicker material. Previous posts about this problem occuring on the HS spar have recommended turning the rivets around so factory head is on thicker metal, would this suggestion also be ok on outboard end of wing spar (stn. 74 to 109) or does anyone have other suggestions ? -------------------------------------- Nine rv-list replies in 24 hours confirm this is a common and sometimes unnoticed problem occuring when riveting the outboard portion of wing spars with rivet gun, squeezer or Avery "C" tool. The three items below gave me nice rivets with zero gap between the W606A & W606C at the rivet itself and a maximum of .003" gap at one midpoint between two reworked rivets (may be due to previous bending of W606C). (1) Turn the rivet around so that the rivet factory head is on the thinner metal, opposite to plans, but OK'd with John @ Vans. (2) Check adjustment/alignment of base block on the Avery C tool, use long shaft & 3/16 drill bit to align with hole in base block. (3) Seat W606A spar and W606C web together after rivet is partially set. Brian Eckstein gave me a clue when he recommended placing a 1/4" socket over rivet and tapping the socket to seat the pieces together, I refined this idea and made a seating block that works with the Avery C tool. Use a scrap piece of aluminum about 3/4" wide X 1" long and 3/4" thick, drill a 1/4" hole part way through the block to sit over a partially set rivet. MY PROCEDURE FOR SETTING OUTBOARD WING -6 RIVETS Using Avery C tool and 3 lb. hammer, one person operation. Place factory head of rivet in Avery C tool rivet set (use the 1.5" extension as required) make sure no protrusions keeps rivet from sitting firmly in rivet set. Level spar, tapered 2 X 4 lumber helps with small adjustments. Use clamps or bolts in holes adjacent to rivet to tie everything together. One hard or two medium blows with hammer to expand rivet diameter and partially set rivet; raise C tool driver and place the aluminum seating block over rivet; lower driver and give one medium blow to top of seating block, this will drive parts together and the expanded rivet will hold parts together; remove seating block; finish setting rivet. OTHER INFO Three hard blows or 5 - 6 medium blows will set 3/16 rivet using 3 lb hammer 16" handle. No weights used to prevent spar bounce. Instead of buying Avery Base Support Block for C tool I used a hardwood block screwed under base. Rivet diameter increases about .010" when set. George McNutt, Langley B.C. 6-A, Wing Spars. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: pbennett(at)zip.com.au
Date: Dec 03, 1997
Subject: Re: Belt Driven Vacuum pumps
> I'm told that Isuzu uses a combination Alternator/Vaccum pump on the diesel > versions of the Trooper. It should be a Nippondenso unit that is similar to > many I've seen on Experimentals. OK, stand up the smart*** down the back who said the Nippodenso alternator sucks! Peter Bennett Sydney Australia RV6 doing the fiddly bits before engine ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Chevy V6 Installation
Date: Dec 03, 1997
>I have been following the debate on the Chevy V6 installations, and must >offer my piece. I have worked for a prominent Chevrolet dealer as a >journeyman technician for the last 9 yrs. I don't think there's anything >you could say to convince me that leaving terra-firma in an aircraft powered >by a Chevrolet 4.3 liter V6 is a good idea. At least I hope you're talking >about the 4.3 and not the 2.8. You ought to be commited if you're speaking >of the latter. :-) > >I am not saying that the 4.3 is a bad engine, because it's not. It is a >fine mill FOR A TRUCK!! It is a smooth running engine with counterbalance >shafts and the like, makes good power and is fairly compact. But it is not >without faults. In a Blazer or Pickup, an oil pump failure or a spun rod or >main bearing is a pain in the neck and a week without your vehicle. In an >aircraft (especially one you just sold out the previous 5 years of your life >to create) it is a MUCH larger problem. Possibly deadly... I look at the >pile of failed engine parts (and complete engines) in our warranty return >that resulted in a complete loss of power (ie: in on the hook) and the >thought of going airborne with that engine makes me shudder. And I am >talking about engines anywhere from brand new (0 miles) and up. > >I am also not saying that Lycomings are immune to these things, but aircraft >engines are designed, built and assembled knowing that lives are on the line >with every revolution of the crankshaft. GM mass produces engines designed >specifically for "gravity bound" vehicles, and takes into account that some >will inevitably fail and need replacement-even with very low miles (hours). >An aircraft engine is stressed far less than an automobile engine as well. >Take an O-360 (360 cu. in.) with 180 horsepower; 1 horsepower per 2 cubic >inches. A 4.3 Vortec (265 cu. in.) with better than 200 hp; nearly 1 hp per >cu. in. I have a snowmobile that puts out as much hp as an O-320 with only >680 cc's. It's small and very light, but I would never consider flying it. >It's too highly stressed!! > >I know I've spent an entire page preaching like a know-it-all. I would be >the first to admit it if proven wrong. I guess I just agree with Van's >statement that "the best conversion for an RV is to convert $8000 into a >used good used Lycoming aircraft engine." By the way, a Chevy truck IS an >outstanding product with an unparalleled warranty.... > >Jon Elford >RV-6A #25201 >Finally a finished horizontal stab!!!! > Thanks, Jon. I've been going over the pros and cons of the auto conversion situation for months. What I really needed to hear was not arm chair guesstimation..but experience over the long term service of the Chevy engine. I drive a GMC 350 V-8...and LOVE that truck...but if it fails on a mountain road..I'll just lay out the sleeping bag in the bed, and sleep on it...won't have to find a stretch of runway in the middle of the forrest! Brian Denk RV-8 #379 ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Lothar Klingmuller <lothark(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: RV MODELS/WEATHER VANE
Date: Dec 03, 1997
My pilot shed (=building to build an 6A) is getting its final touches. Does anybody know where I can get an RV weather van and/or 6A model? Safe and happy landings -ALWAYS! Lothar* K.|| Denver, CO || (303) 922-2329 || installing electric/radiant floor hook up in the new PILOT SHED (~carriagehouse)|| loocking for RV- 6 JIG ||| *(pron'd: "low-TARR") ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 03, 1997
Subject: Re: Aileron Gap Fairings
<< I have just finished installing the gap fairing on my left wing and was wondering what you guys thought about gluing the fairings to the top skin instead of rivets. Pro Seal or silicon sealer could be used. Sure would be a lot easier. Gary Zilik RV-6A S/N 22993 >> I've posted this before, but it sounds like it's a bit late for you, Gary. The gap seal will reach the rear spar, if not trimmed. You can use the rear spar rivets to hold the thing in place, thus eliminating the row of rivets aft of the spar. This makes for a cleaner installation. In your case, I'd use proseal, or some of that 3M structural tape, probably the 20 mil stuff. Check six! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
From: gasobek(at)juno.com
Date: Dec 03, 1997
Subject: Re: Chevy V6 Installation
Why would someone try to modify a great aircraft against the designers recommendation? ---------- insert ---------- A WORD ABOUT ENGINES: Vans recommends Lycoming aircraft engines ONLY. This is not because we make vast profits selling them (our markup is very small) but because we have yet to find an alternative that approaches the Lycoming in reliability, weight, performance or, all things considered, price. ---------- end insert --------- The above info was copied from: http://www.vansaircraft.com/sections/cat-engi.htm In 40 hours of RV-6 flying, I have been able to duplicate (or exceed) all the performance that Van advertises. Top speed to date has been 235 mph, stall 48 mph, economy cruise 184 mph @ 6 gph = 30 mpg. 75% power cruise is 190 mph at 8.55 gph. Take off from airport at 1,440 feet MSL and level off at 10,000 MSL 8.6 Nm from the airport without trying. Have flow VFR on top on one flight for 1.5 hours. Speeds and distances verified by GPS. Gary A. Sobek RV-6 N157GS O-320 Hartzell writes: > > > > >>I have been following the debate on the Chevy V6 installations, and >must >>offer my piece. I have worked for a prominent Chevrolet dealer as a >>journeyman technician for the last 9 yrs. I don't think there's >anything >>you could say to convince me that leaving terra-firma in an aircraft >powered >>by a Chevrolet 4.3 liter V6 is a good idea. At least I hope you're >talking >>about the 4.3 and not the 2.8. You ought to be commited if you're >speaking >>of the latter. :-) >> >>I am not saying that the 4.3 is a bad engine, because it's not. It >is >a >>fine mill FOR A TRUCK!! It is a smooth running engine with >counterbalance >>shafts and the like, makes good power and is fairly compact. But it >is >not >>without faults. In a Blazer or Pickup, an oil pump failure or a spun > >rod or >>main bearing is a pain in the neck and a week without your vehicle. >In >an >>aircraft (especially one you just sold out the previous 5 years of >your >life >>to create) it is a MUCH larger problem. Possibly deadly... I look >at >the >>pile of failed engine parts (and complete engines) in our warranty >return >>that resulted in a complete loss of power (ie: in on the hook) and >the >>thought of going airborne with that engine makes me shudder. And I >am >>talking about engines anywhere from brand new (0 miles) and up. >> >>I am also not saying that Lycomings are immune to these things, but >aircraft >>engines are designed, built and assembled knowing that lives are on >the >line >>with every revolution of the crankshaft. GM mass produces engines >designed >>specifically for "gravity bound" vehicles, and takes into account >that >some >>will inevitably fail and need replacement-even with very low miles >(hours). >>An aircraft engine is stressed far less than an automobile engine as >well. >>Take an O-360 (360 cu. in.) with 180 horsepower; 1 horsepower per 2 >cubic >>inches. A 4.3 Vortec (265 cu. in.) with better than 200 hp; nearly 1 > >hp per >>cu. in. I have a snowmobile that puts out as much hp as an O-320 >with >only >>680 cc's. It's small and very light, but I would never consider >flying >it. >>It's too highly stressed!! >> >>I know I've spent an entire page preaching like a know-it-all. I >would >be >>the first to admit it if proven wrong. I guess I just agree with >Van's >>statement that "the best conversion for an RV is to convert $8000 >into >a >>used good used Lycoming aircraft engine." By the way, a Chevy truck >IS >an >>outstanding product with an unparalleled warranty.... >> >>Jon Elford >>RV-6A #25201 >>Finally a finished horizontal stab!!!! >> > > >Thanks, Jon. I've been going over the pros and cons of the auto >conversion situation for months. What I really needed to hear was not >arm chair guesstimation..but experience over the long term service of >the Chevy engine. I drive a GMC 350 V-8...and LOVE that truck...but if > >it fails on a mountain road..I'll just lay out the sleeping bag in the > >bed, and sleep on it...won't have to find a stretch of runway in the >middle of the forrest! > >Brian Denk >RV-8 #379 > > > > > > > > >______________________________________________________ >Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Lothar Klingmuller <lothark(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: COMPRESSED AIR LINE/NOISE REDUCERS
Date: Dec 03, 1997
Since I originally posed the question and received many useful hints and opinions, here are my rasons why I did what: I used a 1/2 " copper line with drain cocks @ each outlet. This was more work* and cost a little more (insignicant to the total project cost!) than PVC. Short spellts of cold weather are commen here in Colorado. Everything gets much more brittle in cold weather. The extra work & cost totally outweighted the possibility of a 'big bang' failure which could possibly occour same time in the future. In Florida I may have opt for thick wall pvc. PS. *Each connection was checked for leaks with soapy water. Found some, specifically @ threaded joints. Thanks to all the opinions received on this subject! > >Try thin diameter PVC. I know, it may sound crazy, but I have it running >through my Paper Recycling plant. I have a whole network of the stuff Safe and happy landings -ALWAYS! Lothar* K.|| Denver, CO || (303) 922-2329 || installing electric/radiant floor hook up in the new PILOT SHED (~carriagehouse)|| loocking for RV- 6 JIG ||| *(pron'd: "low-TARR") ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 03, 1997
Subject: Cabin Heat
From: wstucklen1(at)juno.com (Frederic W Stucklen)
Will, The "spare box area" I referred to is where the wing spare goes through the fuselage. Cold outside air entering this area comes from leakage past the spar hole in the fuselage sides, from the aileron push tube access holes in the fuselage sides, and inderectly, from the flap actuation push rod holes in the fuselage sides and undersides. All these cold air sources contribute to causing the seating floor, baggage compartment floor, and spar box (under your knees) to be cold and drafty. While the fresh air intakes require exhaust area, there is ample leakage in the cabin area to accomplish this. What is desired is enough SUCKTION leakage from the canopy seal to allow the HEATED air to come in. When the canopy SUCTION leakage exceeds the rate at which the HEATED air source comes in, then it will suck in the air from all other (COLD) sources. If the COLD air sources exceed the HOT air sources, then the suction will bring in more COld ait than HOT air. Now if there were NO canaopy SUCTION leaks, then the HOT air RAM pressure would be the predominate factor. Then all COLD air sources would become cabin exhaust points, and hence, no cold air or drafts..... It gets complicated...... Seal the canopy the best you can.... By the way, take the "R" out of my other address and it would have gone through..... Fred Stucklen RV-6A N925RV (Working on 2'd RV-6A - Chevy Powered!) wstucklen1(at)juno.com Will Cretsinger wrote: > > Will Cretsinger wrote: > > > > Fred, I appreciated your comments on the list regarding cockpit heat. > > What do you mean by "spare box area"? I asked an RV-6A owner about > > weather seal for the canopy, expecially along the longerons, and he > > indicated a seal was not really desirable because any gap provides an > > exit for the cabin air from the inlets. He didn't mention the possibility of > > siphoning cold air from elsewhere in the winter. > > > > In addition to the aileron pushrod boots, what other sealing do you feel > > is desirable? How did you seal your canopy...I have a tilt > > canopy...working on it now...drilled but not riveted. What > > sound/temperature insulation did you use and where? > > > > I have sent SASE for your boot drawing...I appreciate your help. > > > > Will Cretsinger > > Arlington, TX > > RV-6A canopyFred, this email may seem strange because the first try resulted in a > returned msg...perhaps I used "one" instead of "ell" following the > name... Fred, This is third try to get to you... Will ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Bumflyer(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 03, 1997
Subject: Re: Painting Gear Legs Before Fiberglassing?
Sounds like a good approach to me. One unsolicited comment I was surprised to find out few tri gear builders put stiffeners on main legs, so I deferred doing this. At 108 hours I still have yet to experience the "shake" I have routinely felt in tail draggers with stiffeners. So far it seems logical to delete this messy and weight producing step. You may want to do the same, and speed up your project? D Walsh ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 03, 1997
From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls(at)aeroelectric.com>
Subject: Automotive alternators
>According to Bill at B&C, the problem is heat under the cowl. Seems auto >alternators often do not get enough cooling under there and so they and/or >their internal regulators go south. Lesson: provide your alternator with >a supply of cool air adequate to keep it health and happy. There is, of >course, the issue of "abusing" the alternator electrically which has been >addressed elsewhere. > >Gary Crane > > I'm not sure that "heat" or any other stress can be identified as the single worst effect on an alternator. I guess I didn't see the threads on "electrical abuse" of alternators and I'm mystified by that notion . . . how does one electrically abuse an alternator? We know intuitively that doing some extra things like a cooling air source is a "good" thing. Necessary? Without measurement data we don't know. B&C's ultra-balancing procedure on their rotors is a strong selling feature . . . not one bearing failure in thousands of units sold? Necessary? There was no measurements taken of relative vibration levels versus failure rates for B&C alternators . . .in fact, no very few B&C alternators figured into the decision but observations of other automotive conversion product's problems prompted the rather expensive decision by B&C to do the ballancing. Irrespective of the discussions on which alternator or how it's installed or if one should worry about abusing it, there's a consideration that transcends all others. Question: After you applied all the best advice, applied your best craftsmanship and educated yourself on it's application, are you now betting anything on the notion that it will never fail? "Never fail" means 100% reliability . . . like your wing spar or elevator control push rod. A nice thing happens when we do failure mode effects analysis and develop satisfactory alterantives to all failures, the discussions about "cooling this just right, or not abusing that" become much less significant. Much of what is brought forward as advice is based on anecdotal information. Nothing wrong with anecdotal information, it's the best we have in many, many design situations but it does not lend itself to analysis for cause/effect or quantified performance and stresses. A lot of B&C's manufacturing decisions are based on anecdotal input. Once you've acquired a component from B&C or any one else, the prudent approach is to assume that any of these parts are going to fail anyhow and develop well a reasoned "plan-b" for the situation. Reliability studies are conducted on critical components of machines like the space shuttle and for commercial air transport of people. Believe me, you cannot afford such efforts on the convenience accessories in your airplane. I recommend you treat EVERYTHING electrical as a convenience item, each backed up by "plan-b" alternatives for the way you intend to use your airplane. Without elaborating here, may I recommend these two pieces availble for viewing elsewhere? <http://www.aeroelectric.com/altvreg.html> <http://www.aeroelectric.com/bltinreg.html> By the way, our weekend seminar schedule for 1998 is beginning to shape up. See <http://www.seminars.html> Bob . . . AeroElectric Connection //// (o o) ===========o00o=(_)=o00o========= ================================= <http://www.aeroelectric.com> ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 03, 1997
Subject: Re: Chevy V6 Installation- bad idea???
<< Why would someone try to modify a great aircraft against the designers recommendation? >> You'd better have your asbestos suit on! Where the heck would we be if a fella named Van hadn't modified one of Ray Stits designs? How about that other fella named Harmon? I certainly didn't have the designer's blessing when I developed the slider for the Rocket. I could go on, but I'll bet you're getting the point....The status quo can usually be improved upon. Let the experimenters experiment! And another (while I'm on my soapbox): "Top speed to date has been 235 mph," This from a -6 with an O-320? Do you know some sort of shortcut? I would agree if you had said this speed was reached with a tailwind (measured groundspeed), or in a dive. If your bird is really this fast (straight & level), I want a ride! Anyone else want to borrow this soapbox? I guess I'm thru...;-) Check six! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 03, 1997
From: Rick Osgood <rick(at)ccc.henn.tec.mn.us>
Subject: Re: Chevy V6 Installation- bad idea???
a) Ya know... if man were ment to fly he'd be born wth wings. b) Jeez, why try something new my horse always got me there. c) What!!! Fly a plane with no propeller are you kidding.... Take your pick... That's why we call it experimental Rick :) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jensen, Keith (MC R&D)" <KJensen(at)simplot.com>
Subject: COMPRESSED AIR LINE/NOISE REDUCERS
Date: Dec 03, 1997
You wrote: Try thin diameter PVC. I know, it may sound crazy, I am running a huge compressor (30hp), but even a small compressor should do the trick Maurice Colontonio Cherry Hill, NJ This is an extremely dangerous proposition! DO NOT run high pressure compressed gas lines in PVC pipe! By high pressure, I mean anything over a couple psig. PVC undergoes brittle shatter when it breaks (unlike Polyethylene, Polypropylene, or members of the Teflon family plastics). If you want a good example of this, take a good heavy hammer and give a piece of PVC pipe a sharp, stout blow. If anything were to happen to an airline of PVC pipe, and you had significant compressed gas pressure behind it, you would have a shrapnel explosion as that pipe came unzipped all along its length (we in the aluminum aircraft arena know that once a crack in brittle material starts with some energy behind it, it doesn't stop until the energy is dispersed). I share this with you as a licensed engineer with plant operations and design experience in the chemical industry. Please, folks, don't try this at home. Sixty to 100 psig will propel sharp PVC fragments at enough velocity to really hurt someone - and invariably it ends up being an innocent child or spouse who had no clue. If you've already got one done this way, I would encourage you to redo it in metal or well-supported rubber airline. Keith Jensen kjensen(at)simplot.com Waiting for -6A emp so Santa can set it out. out trying. Have >flow VFR on top on one flight for 1.5 hours. Speeds and distances >verified by GPS. > >Gary A. Sobek >RV-6 N157GS O-320 Hartzell >writes: >> >> >> >> >>>I have been following the debate on the Chevy V6 installations, and >>must >>>offer my piece. I have worked for a prominent Chevrolet dealer as a >>>journeyman technician for the last 9 yrs. I don't think there's >>anything >>>you could say to convince me that leaving terra-firma in an aircraft > >>powered >>>by a Chevrolet 4.3 liter V6 is a good idea. At least I hope you're >>talking >>>about the 4.3 and not the 2.8. You ought to be commited if you're >>speaking >>>of the latter. :-) >>> >>>I am not saying that the 4.3 is a bad engine, because it's not. It >>is >>a >>>fine mill FOR A TRUCK!! It is a smooth running engine with >>counterbalance >>>shafts and the like, makes good power and is fairly compact. But it > >>is >>not >>>without faults. In a Blazer or Pickup, an oil pump failure or a >spun >> >>rod or >>>main bearing is a pain in the neck and a week without your vehicle. > >>In >>an >>>aircraft (especially one you just sold out the previous 5 years of >>your >>life >>>to create) it is a MUCH larger problem. Possibly deadly... I look >>at >>the >>>pile of failed engine parts (and complete engines) in our warranty >>return >>>that resulted in a complete loss of power (ie: in on the hook) and >>the >>>thought of going airborne with that engine makes me shudder. And I >>am >>>talking about engines anywhere from brand new (0 miles) and up. >>> >>>I am also not saying that Lycomings are immune to these things, but >>aircraft >>>engines are designed, built and assembled knowing that lives are on >>the >>line >>>with every revolution of the crankshaft. GM mass produces engines >>designed >>>specifically for "gravity bound" vehicles, and takes into account >>that >>some >>>will inevitably fail and need replacement-even with very low miles >>(hours). >>>An aircraft engine is stressed far less than an automobile engine as > >>well. >>>Take an O-360 (360 cu. in.) with 180 horsepower; 1 horsepower per 2 >>cubic >>>inches. A 4.3 Vortec (265 cu. in.) with better than 200 hp; nearly >1 >> >>hp per >>>cu. in. I have a snowmobile that puts out as much hp as an O-320 >>with >>only >>>680 cc's. It's small and very light, but I would never consider >>flying >>it. >>>It's too highly stressed!! >>> >>>I know I've spent an entire page preaching like a know-it-all. I >>would >>be >>>the first to admit it if proven wrong. I guess I just agree with >>Van's >>>statement that "the best conversion for an RV is to convert $8000 >>into >>a >>>used good used Lycoming aircraft engine." By the way, a Chevy truck > >>IS >>an >>>outstanding product with an unparalleled warranty.... >>> >>>Jon Elford >>>RV-6A #25201 >>>Finally a finished horizontal stab!!!! >>> >> >> >>Thanks, Jon. I've been going over the pros and cons of the auto >>conversion situation for months. What I really needed to hear was not > >>arm chair guesstimation..but experience over the long term service of > >>the Chevy engine. I drive a GMC 350 V-8...and LOVE that truck...but >if >> >>it fails on a mountain road..I'll just lay out the sleeping bag in >the >> >>bed, and sleep on it...won't have to find a stretch of runway in the >>middle of the forrest! >> >>Brian Denk >>RV-8 #379 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>______________________________________________________ >>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com >> >> >> >> > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 03, 1997
From: Mike Wills <willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil>
Subject: Re: Chevy V6 Installation
Guess I stirred a few folks up by asking Hal (in jest) why he was looking for a used Chevy setup. Sorry about that Hal. My real point was in trying to determine whether or not Belted Air has started delivering, and what the real price is. It appears that the answer is no and price is still undetermined. IMO the goal of an auto conversion should be a proven affordable and reliable installation with Lycoming equivalent performance. I dont care to be someone's beta tester, especially not if I am being asked to pay $10,000+ for the priveledge. Those do-it-yourself guys like Tracy Crook (RV-4 with Mazda 13B now at about 600 hours and firewall forward cost of less than $6000) are in the right ballpark. As for the comment about modifying a design against the designers wishes, if everyone believed that, there would be no RV's and you would be flying a Stits Playboy. Obviously a Lyc is the best choice for the vast majority of builders but I applaude those who experiment in an attempt to improve the breed. And finally, as for your performance numbers, those are some truly spectacular numbers. The only RV's that I have heard of attaining that kind of performance are flying behind 200+ HP (another unapproved mod) and with very carefully detailed airframes. Refer to the current RVator article about Dave Anders' RV-4. Your numbers are not too far off from his. Can you describe what you have, what aerodynamic tweaks you have done, etc??? Or are you flying in magic air the rest of us dont have access to? Mike Wills RV-4(wings done!; saving for fuse kit) willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil > >Why would someone try to modify a great aircraft against the designers >recommendation? > >In 40 hours of RV-6 flying, I have been able to duplicate (or exceed) all >the performance that Van advertises. Top speed to date has been 235 mph, > stall 48 mph, economy cruise 184 mph @ 6 gph = 30 mpg. 75% power cruise >is 190 mph at 8.55 gph. Take off from airport at 1,440 feet MSL and >level off at 10,000 MSL 8.6 Nm from the airport without trying. Have >flow VFR on top on one flight for 1.5 hours. Speeds and distances >verified by GPS. > >Gary A. Sobek >RV-6 N157GS O-320 Hartzell ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rvbldr3170(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 03, 1997
Subject: Re: Chevy V6 Installation
<< I don't think there's anything you could say to convince me that leaving terra-firma in an aircraft powered by a Chevrolet 4.3 liter V6 is a good idea. >> Ther are a few people who have been doing just that for quite a few years now and they are still alive. <> Only the new ones have the balance shafts <> I've got 184,000 miles out of my Vortec and it hasn't missed a beat, and I think that an oil pump failure is just as likely in a Lycosaurus as it is in a Chevy ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rvbldr3170(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 03, 1997
Subject: Re: chevy V6 installation (for sale??)
<< I think you can still come out of it all with a brand new engine and still make it all fly for around $5000 -$6000. >> That may be a little low unless you go the "scrounge" route for everything. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rvbldr3170(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 03, 1997
Subject: Re: chevy V6
>>If the Chevy setup is the bargain priced alternative to Lycoming that OMABP, Richard Finch, etc... claim it to be, why do you need to find a used one?<< I chose to use a runout because a used block has "settled " from all the heating and cooling cycles it has endured in the course of use. All race engines are built from "used" blocks. also I would have torn down a new engine anyway to make sure all the clearances and dimensions were "blueprint" spec. I'll have about $9,000 FWF in mine as I stated before here, with FI dual ignition, aluminum heads etc. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MLaboyteau(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 03, 1997
Subject: Heat Muff-Cowl interference
Yesterday, I finally installed my Larry Vetterman exhaust system on my IO-320, and mounted the dual output heat muff on the forward crossover tube. So far, so good. I then tried to put the bottom cowl on, and discovered that it no longer fits! With the muff mounted on the forward crossover tube, it strikes the cowl. The muff is too long to mount anywhere else on the exhaust system. And it has to be oriented a certain way in order to avoid rubbing on the aft crossover tube. Has anyone else had the same problem? Do the Robbins heat muffs fit better? Without the heat muff, and cowl mounted, there is ample clearance. Maybe I could use a smaller single output heatmuff and just skip the heated alternate air, it is an IO-320. Mark LaBoyteaux RV-6A N106RV MLaboyteau(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rvbldr3170(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 03, 1997
Subject: Re: Chevy V6 Installation- bad idea???
<< You'd better have your asbestos suit on! Where the heck would we be if a fella named Van hadn't modified one of Ray Stits designs? How about that other fella named Harmon? I certainly didn't have the designer's blessing when I developed the slider for the Rocket. I could go on, but I'll bet you're getting the point....The status quo can usually be improved upon. Let the experimenters experiment! >> Alright one more and I'm through ! I don't recommend to anyone that the Chevy is the way to go or better or yadda, yadda, yadda. But for me it IS the way I want to go and I don't need someone that has NEVER even tried it to telll me it won't work. ALL of the posts on the negative side, and I mean every single one, has been written by someone who THINKS it won't fly, and a lot of the positive ones were written by someone who is actually doing it !!! Unless and until I hear about someone that actually DID it and it didn't work or whatever, I will remain convinced that it is viable. So all you guys trying to talk us out of it can stop wasting our time. BTW if you aren't 100% sure you want to do it, that means you are 100% sure you don't My $.02 worth ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rvbldr3170(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 03, 1997
Subject: Re: chevy V6
<< the new Chevy Vortec block are set at 90 degrees instead of 60 degrees (or maybe vice-versa) >> There is a 60 degree V-6 available from Chevy but that is an entirely different engine design. The Vortec is still available and is a 90 degree block, bsaed on the sucessful "small block" V-8 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 03, 1997
From: Mike Wills <willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil>
Subject: Re: chevy V6
Not questioning/doubting your choice of engine. You explained previously in detail the mods you have made to your Chevy to suit your requirements for aircraft use. Your FWF cost for your much modified Chevy seems quite reasonable. I do question why anyone would want to pay $10,000+ for a relatively unproven FWF package based on a production over-the-counter engine that costs less than $2000 direct from Chevy. Is a motor mount, radiator, and some odds and ends (I realize this is somewhat over-simplified) really worth $8000+? Looking forward to hearing of your progress, and hope others will continue to experiment as you have in an attempt to come up with a reasonably priced, proven, reliable alternative to Lyc. Mike Wills RV-4(wings done!; saving for fuse kit) willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil > >I chose to use a runout because a used block has "settled " from all the >heating and cooling cycles it has endured in the course of use. All race >engines are built from "used" blocks. also I would have torn down a new >engine anyway to make sure all the clearances and dimensions were "blueprint" >spec. > >I'll have about $9,000 FWF in mine as I stated before here, with FI dual >ignition, aluminum heads etc. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ernesto Sanchez" <es12043(at)utech.com>
Subject: Re: chevy V6
Date: Dec 03, 1997
>I thought that I read somewhere that the Chevy Vortac block that is >commonly used isn't available new anymore. The new Chevy Vortec block are >set at 90 degrees instead of 60 degrees (or maybe vice-versa) >You also have to replace the stock cam with a marine use cam. At >Copperstate, I talked to Jess and he said that the firewall forward package >Regards, >Tom Velvick >rver(at)caljet.com >rv-6a wings The Chev Votec block has always been a 90 degree block. From the beginning, GM took a Chev V-8 (90 degree) and lopped two cylinders off to make the V-6. Chev also produced a smaller 60 degree V-6 all metric engine that was used in small trucks and cars. Two very different motors. Both blocks are available through Chev (all alum versions too. Big$$) at junk yards and at rebuilt engine suppliers (Kragen's and Pep Boys in CA too.) Both are common motors. Buy or build the motor, buy or make a re-drive and make the mount. Realistically, $10,000 total. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 03, 1997
From: halk(at)sybase.com (Hal Kempthorne)
Subject: Re: Chevy V6 Installation
Hi all, Thanks to Jon and Brian for some valuable input on the engine topic. Of course, I have some reply comments to Jon's remarks. First let me tell you something that we in the software business have discovered. Our products look terrible **to us** as we see all the flaws. No one calls us up to tell us they think our product is great. So a Chevy mech sees all the troubles with his stuff but not with aircraft engines. I've been nearly fifty years driving Chevy trucks - three of them and only one was new. I drive fast nearly all the time. I brought everything we owned from Kansas to Oregon with the new one pulling a 14 foot U-Haul and the truck box stuffed. The engine was running at full power nearly all the way. The oil pressure was lower at the end of the journey but it went on to 120,000 miles. This was the stock engine, not one with 4340 steel rods and crank or even forged pistons. I don't know if a Lyc could do that but I'm ready to bet anyone that a Continental can't do 100% power for more than 24 hours! Used Lycomings break too, Jon. Either way, get a new engine with new rods and crank. They all break. When I got my pilot's license over 20 years ago, engine failure was a major topic in the training. I've dealt with several engine problems since including a spun rod bearing. The only failures I've experienced with auto engines were either expected or "won't start". I've never even experienced a failure racing british cars! Either option is, I suspect, acceptable for use and quite safe. The Lycoming option is quite a bit more expensive in terms of purchase and maintenance. The Chevy (a new 4.3 of course) is quite adequate and, in my *VERY* carefully considered opinion, safer than a tired or poorly maintained Lycoming. Do us a favor, Jon, tell us what parts you have seen fail in the Chevy engine. I am quite interested in failures in the 4.3 post '87 Vortec. And try not to scold. Hal Kempthorne RV-6AQ -- WANTED TO BUY - a used Chevy V-6 setup. halk(at)sybase.com Santa Clara, CA. Debonair N6134V @ SJC > > >I have been following the debate on the Chevy V6 installations, and > must > >offer my piece. I have worked for a prominent Chevrolet dealer as a > >journeyman technician for the last 9 yrs. I don't think there's > anything > >you could say to convince me that leaving terra-firma in an aircraft > powered > >by a Chevrolet 4.3 liter V6 is a good idea. > >used good used Lycoming aircraft engine." By the way, a Chevy truck IS > an > >outstanding product with an unparalleled warranty.... > > > >Jon Elford > >RV-6A #25201 > >Finally a finished horizontal stab!!!! > > > > > Thanks, Jon. I've been going over the pros and cons of the auto > conversion situation for months. What I really needed to hear was not > arm chair guesstimation..but experience over the long term service of > the Chevy engine. I drive a GMC 350 V-8...and LOVE that truck...but if > it fails on a mountain road..I'll just lay out the sleeping bag in the > bed, and sleep on it...won't have to find a stretch of runway in the > middle of the forrest! > > Brian Denk > RV-8 #379 > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 03, 1997
From: halk(at)sybase.com (Hal Kempthorne)
Subject: Re: RV MODELS/WEATHER VANE
An RV weather vane! I think I'll make one! hal ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Bumflyer(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 03, 1997
Subject: Duckworks landing lights - Try a different lens?
Count me as a satisfied customer. A great product and a good kit with an excellent set of instructions. As a bonus, when I installed the two light system on my left wing, it wound up (with no adjustment required) pointed perfectly with both light patterns converging about 50 feet in front of the airplane in taxi stance and just the right distance to the runway on final approach to let me know when to flare. This is an RV-6A. D Walsh ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 03, 1997
From: Mike Wills <willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil>
Subject: list upgrades;fund raising
Matt, Just wanted to say thanks for the recent improvements to the list. I'm seeing my posts less than an hour after sending them as opposed to 1/2 - 1 day as before. Removes the doubt as to whether what I send has vanished. As for the list fund raiser, let me apologize for not contributing at the time the call was first circulated. This caught me as I was finishing up my wings, and saving to get my fuselage kit on order, christmas shopping, etc... I get a lot of use out of this list and really appreciate the effort you put into it. Expect my contribution first part of the new year. Mike Wills RV-4(wings done!; saving for fuse kit) willsm(at)manta.nosc.mil ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 03, 1997
From: Scott Gesele <scottg(at)icsnet.com>
Subject: rv-list: RV-6A Pilot Operating Handbook
Listers, I've finally "finished" the POH that I've been working on over the past few months. It is specific to my particular aircraft, but it should be easy to modify it to any other RV with little effort. It can be downloaded at: http://villagenet.com/~scottg/poh.html There are two different versions. One is available in both word 95 and word 97 format. This version does not have three embedded *.bmp's. These bmp's are scanned images from the Lycoming operations manual. They are available for downloading on the same page. For some reason, when an image is embedded in a word document, the overall file size gets much, much bigger than by having the text and image separate. Example, the three images are about 4 meg total. The word 95 file is about 3.6 meg. If I were to embed the images in the word 95 document, the resulting file size would be over 19 meg !!! The second version is in word 97 format only and contains the embedded pictures. If anyone has any problems with the download, please e-mail me and it will be fixed. Let me know if anyone needs a copy of this in any other format (except for Mac's) and I'll do my best to convert it. Hope this helps. Scott Gesele N506RV - Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 03, 1997
From: halk(at)sybase.com (Hal Kempthorne)
Subject: Re: chevy V6
Wrong info here - new engine (okay a month ago) for $3300; long block about $1600. The engine is the 90 degree block - 3/4 of a small block V8 - 262 CID. At least one RV builder was installing the package last month. Charles? hal > > I thought that I read somewhere that the Chevy Vortac block that is > commonly used isn't available new anymore. The new Chevy Vortec block are > set at 90 degrees instead of 60 degrees (or maybe vice-versa) > You also have to replace the stock cam with a marine use cam. At > Copperstate, I talked to Jess and he said that the firewall forward package > for the RV-6a was not available yet, but should be in early 1998. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: High Comp. Pistons
Date: Dec 03, 1997
From: Christopher Dahl <dahlhouse(at)cdepot.net>
Are any of you or do any of you have experience with running higher compression pistons in a 160hp O-320? Was thinking along the lines of 10:1. If so, would you do it again or no? Any pro's and con's in reply would be appreciated. Christopher Dahl Sutter Creek, Ca RV-4 N426RC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 03, 1997
From: Thomas Velvick <rver(at)caljet.com>
Subject: Re: chevy V6
>There is a 60 degree V-6 available from Chevy but that is an entirely >different engine design. The Vortec is still available and is a 90 degree >block, bsaed on the sucessful "small block" V-8 Thats great to know. If you were going to look for a Chevy Vortec V-6 engine to use, what year and type of vehicle would you look for to get it out of? Regards, Tom Velvick rver(at)caljet.com rv-6a wings


November 19, 1997 - December 03, 1997

RV-Archive.digest.vol-ds