RV-Archive.digest.vol-hb

October 03, 1999 - October 11, 1999



      pretty much everything. but the burning question is why vans would want it
      done that way?
          I feel more confortable dimpling everything, but whenever i deviate from
      the plans, i worry that i'll regret it in the next step...anyone been there
      done that??
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson(at)carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Search Engine
Date: Oct 03, 1999
Boy, Sure shows you what happens when you engage keyboard before brain. As Michael points out, I was attempting to search under the new RV-6 archieve rather than the old RV archieve which of course is the one that has the history on the topics I was search for. Whap up side of my head.. Thanks folks Ed > Ed, > > I've used it recently just fine and I just checked it--it is working now. > > Of course the RV6 specific list didn't get any responses because it is new > and I think everyone is sticking with the more general and original RV list. > On the RV list I just got 25 hits for "tow bar" and 400 for "primer." Give > it a try now and see if it works. > > Good luck, > > Michael > Portland > sylph(at)uswest.net > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson(at)carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Search Engine
Date: Oct 03, 1999
Apologies to Matt for the mail on the topic of my senility in searching the new RV-6 archive, when the historical stuff I was looking for was in the original RV archive. Once my error pointed out , I executed another search on "tow bars" under "RV" this time and got 30 hits. So clearly nothing wrong with the program just the operator on this side of the key board {:>). Thanks to all who pointed out my error. Ed Ed Anderson Matthews NC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson(at)carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Search Engine
Date: Oct 03, 1999
----- Original Message ----- From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com> Sent: Saturday, October 02, 1999 9:58 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Search Engine > > >-------------- > > > >Has anyone tried using the List search engine in the last day or so. I > >tried to search the RV-6 archieves and get no hits on "tow bar", "primer", > >etc., and you know we have had plenty of chat on both. Anyone else having > >the same problem?? > > > >Ed Anderson > >Matthew NC > >-------------- > > Ed, > > Are you sure that you weren't seeing those posts on the normal RV-List? My > account records show that there haven't been any posts on the RV6 specific List > in a few days. I did a search on "tow bar" and "primer 1999" in the "RV" > archive and came back with the expected number of hits...? > > Best regards, > > Matt Dralle > List Admin. > > My apologies Matt, nothing wrong with the search engine, just the operator on this side of the key board. Searching for historical things in new RV-6 archieve is just not too bright. Ed Anderson Matthew NC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 03, 1999
From: Glenn & Judi <glenng(at)megsinet.net>
Subject: priming systems
Hi, I am curious what the majority of people are doing to prime their engines. 1. Manual plunger type primer. 2. Valve & electric fuel pump to prime 3. No primer system. Just using the accelerator pump from the carb. I live in the Chicago area where it has been known to get cold from time to time. -Glenn Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 03, 1999
From: Richard Reynolds <RVReynolds(at)macs.net>
Subject: Franklin, VA fly-In Cancelled
EAA Chapter 339 (Norfolk, VA) Fall Fly-In Oct 9-10 has ben cancelled due to "little" problems caused by hurricane Floyd. The airfield is OK, but all the supporting services, telephones, motel had 3ft of water damage, downtown 12ft, mosquitoes, etc. are not fully restored. Call Walt Ohlrich at 757-486-5192, if you have any questions. Richard Reynolds, Norfolk, VA RV-6A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Scott Johnson" <scottjohnson345(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: priming systems
Date: Oct 03, 1999
Hi Glenn, I live in Chicago and have an RV6A. My recommendation is forget the primer all together. Spend your time and money installing the crankcase and cylinder heater bands from Reiff. I have an primer valve from Aircraft Spruce and never use it. When its cold out, I just plug in the heater for an hour or so, and it starts easy without priming. I know a lot of people who will start a cold engine at 10 below with the primer and no preheat, this is not good for the engine. Scott Johnson RV6A 345RV ----- Original Message ----- From: Glenn & Judi <glenng(at)megsinet.net> Sent: Sunday, October 03, 1999 1:25 PM Subject: RV-List: priming systems > > Hi, > I am curious what the majority of people are doing to prime their > engines. > > 1. Manual plunger type primer. > 2. Valve & electric fuel pump to prime > 3. No primer system. Just using the accelerator pump from the carb. > > I live in the Chicago area where it has been known to get cold from time > to time. > > -Glenn Gordon > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 03, 1999
From: Bob Skinner <bskinner(at)vcn.com>
Subject: Re: air scoop yikes!
RVers, There are a couple of other things that you might consider to help make your bottom colw a little easier to remove and install. On my six, I attached the baffle seal material to the top plate of the FAB airbox. The bottom part, or "U", was attached to the fiberglass "tunnel" that the builder fabricates with the help of the foam plug. The baffle material is RTV'd to the tunnel and I put a couple of #6 screws on each side at the top of the "U" to help hold things in place. Using this method makes the cowl much easier to remove as you don't have have the seal material to contend with when installing. We used this method on "Gillete Charlie's" 6A, as well. Cowl removal is a bit easier on the 6A as you don't have the main gear legs to contend with. We also made removable inlet seals that attach on the front, horizontal baffles with 2, #6 screws into nutplates installed on the baffles. The baffle seal material has a metal strip that spans the inlets, latterally and the baffle material is siliconed to this strip. These strips are removed before the bottom cowl is dropped. Like Scott, I've seen RVers have a heck of a time with bottom cowl removal. Using the above mentioned modifications seems to make things go a lot smoother. If you've installed your cowl with a really tight gap to the spinner, you'll still have a bit of a problem and will probably scratch the front face of the bottom cowl, but it will be hidden by the spinner. On my six, I used to use some small pieces of the stick-on sun shade that I carried in my tool kit and stuck this material to the front face of the cowl and the leading edge of the gear leg fairings to help protect the paint when removing the cowl. This sun shade material also works well for sealing the fuel caps if you're parked outside and rain is a possibility. I also used pieces of this material to seal the seam in the front of the tip up canopy (before buying a cover from D.J.) and to seal the NACA vents. Oh, and I also used it to keep the sun off my noggin:) Bob Skinner 1995 RV6 (sold) Buffalo, WY >And I would like to add that it is important to do this unless you want >to struggle to install and remove your cowl. >If the airbox extends all the way fwd to the scoop inlet, it is then >actually fwd of the opening cut in the main cowl for the scoop to attach. >This makes it impossible to lower the cowl downward because the airbox >gets caught under the top of the inlet scoop. >If you can't lower the cowl, it makes it very hard to get it out from >behind the bottom half of the spinner. >>From what I have seen on RV's at fly-in's their are lots of people >having a hard time getting their cowls on and off, and they may not even >know why. >Scott McDaniels >Former RV-6A owner >North Plains OR. smcdaniels(at)juno.com >These opinions and ideas are mine alone, and they may >not reflect the opinions and ideas of my employer. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "The French's" <french@mag-net.com>
Subject: Re: Navaid wing leveler
Date: Oct 03, 1999
Don't forget. The Navaid trim is only operational when the unit is in wing leveller mode or autopilot mode. The rest of the time, i.e. in the pattern, just flying around, or in the mountains, when you prefer not to use the Navaid, you will not have any trim adjust unless you install a separate system. I have the manual trim supplied by Van's and it works just fine. Ted French RV-6A flying Prince George BC ----- Original Message ----- From: David Ford <dford(at)michweb.net> Sent: October 2, 1999 9:01 PM Subject: RV-List: Navaid wing leveler > > Someone please enlighten me. I have ordered the wing kit with aileron electric > trim. I want to incorporate the Navaid wing leveler. Is aileron trim unnecessary > with the Navaid? Where can I find out information/purchase the Navaid? > > Dave Ford > awaiting wings > RV6 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MRawls3896(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 03, 1999
Subject: Re: Frozen Engine Bolts
If you have a hand held impact wrench with the size Allen head, that would probably be all you need. But if it is real stubborn, you will have to use some heat. Mechanic in Houston (enpenage) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <rv8er(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Frozen Engine Bolts
Date: Oct 03, 1999
The problem with this installation is, the plugs were on the back of the engine, and the engine is mounted, so there was not way to get a hammer in there to hit it! I wish I knew this before I mounted it... Paul Besing RV-6A (197AB) Arizona http://members.home.net/rv8er Finish Kit -----Original Message----- From: MRawls3896(at)aol.com <MRawls3896(at)aol.com> Date: Sunday, October 03, 1999 3:53 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Frozen Engine Bolts > > If you have a hand held impact wrench with the size Allen head, that >would probably be all you need. But if it is real stubborn, you will have to >use some heat. > >Mechanic in Houston (enpenage) > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 03, 1999
From: Tim Houle <thoule(at)kneehill.com>
Subject: Terry Gannon
Hi Terry, It's Tim Houle here. Could you please email me your phone #. Would like to take a look at your project. Thanks ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 03, 1999
From: Michael McGee <jmpcrftr(at)teleport.com>
Subject: PTT wiring
First I have no experience or schematic with the PM units, I have a Flightcom 403. However most of the PTT setups I've seen use the PTT to simply ground the one wire coming from the mic key line for the particular chanel. That is why the return wire on some is connected to the outside ring on the jack (the ground ring). Therefore you don't really need to run two wires to the PTT. You can run just one tiny 24 ga wire and ground the other side of the PTT switch. I guess now the challenge is to find an easy way to go to ground inside the 1" ctrl stick. It works on the Flightcom 403 anyway. Take another look at the schematic and see if the key line just goes to ground. Mike RV-4 N996RV (open for inspection and the weather is still good :( ) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JHeadric(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 03, 1999
Subject: Re: priming systems
I have tried all the systems to prime that you mentioned and I think the pump type primer is most efficient and less dangerous of backfires and engine/carb fires. Jim ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 03, 1999
From: Hal Kempthorne <kempthorne(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: bottom skins 6a
> I feel more confortable dimpling everything, but whenever i deviate from >the plans, i worry that i'll regret it in the next step...anyone been there >done that?? If you mean deviated and regretted, then I suspect many have been there, done that. It isn't something we can blame Van's about but a fact of life about development, especially in a pure empirical (trial and error) methodology. Van developed the RV series by deviation from the Stits Playboy design. In my humble opinion, there is still room for changes to the design before perfection sets in. Van would probably encourage experimentation if it were not for all the lawyers circling overhead. hal ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MOOREWAR(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 03, 1999
Subject: RV4-CopperState
I will be going to the Copper State fly-in this fri and sat and would love to talk to RV4 owner/builder. I am just starting the canopy and firewall forward on mine and would like to ask about a zillion questions and take a look under the cowl. I know this is kinda of a hassel, but would be happy to pay for lunch, some fuel, etc. Thanks, Warren Moore ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 03, 1999
From: Hal Kempthorne <kempthorne(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Rudder pedal (hanging) fix question
Hi, What does this consist of? Are there any non-weld, non-remove fixes available? Is it a problem for all or just those who brace on the pedals when tense? hal ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HCRV6(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 03, 1999
Subject: Taildragger Pull Handle
Mike Robbins said " B.A.S. (his name is Bud) can make one for a -6. I'm not sure where it goes in a -6," Mike: Thanks for the details, now I hate to admit that I lost your original post. Do you have an address, e-mail or phone number for B.A.S.? Harry Crosby (HCRV6(at)aol.com) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BSEckstein(at)cs.com
Date: Oct 03, 1999
Subject: Re: Rudder pedal (hanging) fix question
I.> > What does this consist of? Small triangular tabs about 2 inches long and 1/2 inch at its widest. These tabs are welded to brace each intersection where the vertical tubing meets the horizontal tubing. Are there any non-weld, non-remove fixes > available? Not that I've heard of > > Is it a problem for all or just those who brace on the pedals when tense? Don't know. > > hal > > Van's was quick in getting them back to me. Probably about a 2 week wait. I had already installed them, but the peace of mind is worth the half day of work in removing, re-priming, re-painting and re-installing. Brian Eckstein 6A finishing ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 03, 1999
From: Scott <acepilot(at)mwt.net>
Subject: Oshkosh 99 funny photo
Here's a few pics from over the summer. Of particular interest is the motorhome shot from Oshkosh 99. RV-4 guys ought to get a chuckle... http://www.mwt.net/~acepilot/miscphotos.html -- --Scott-- 1986 Corben Junior Ace N3642 RV-4 under construction (tail feathers) Gotta Fly or Gonna Die! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: RV rolling wing cart for sale
Date: Oct 03, 1999
Listers, I no longer have a need for my wing cart...which is a good thing! So, it's available for anyone who wants to come pick it up in Albuquerque. There are pics of it on my webpage at: http://geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Hangar/9656/wing.htm It's seriously stout, and easy to move about since it has wheels. It cost me $65 in materials, and I'll let it go for $20, and you buy lunch and uh...refreshments...when you come to pick it up. How's that for a deal? Brian Denk RV8 N94BD bolting on the tail....then the wings. AEG, hangar E-13 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 03, 1999
Subject: Re: priming systems
In a message dated 10/3/99 5:50:50 AM Pacific Daylight Time, glenng(at)megsinet.net writes: << I am curious what the majority of people are doing to prime their engines. 1. Manual plunger type primer. 2. Valve & electric fuel pump to prime 3. No primer system. Just using the accelerator pump from the carb. >> Sorry to phase it so, but I did number 2 and am quite satisfied. ; ) -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gardner, Douglas (GA01)" <Douglas.Gardner(at)iac.honeywell.com>
Subject: Instrument panel cutouts
Date: Oct 03, 1999
Listers.. I'm contemplating making my own panel cutouts on my -8 instrument panel which means purchasing the 2 1/4, 3 1/8 hole cutter, and the screw template.. approx. $150.00 Heck, what's another 150 tacked to the $3800 I've already spent on tools and tool boxes. What do others do ?? Gulf Avionics quoted $300.00 to cut the panel. Thanks, Doug Gardner -8A Palm Harbor Fla Interior Cabin ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BSEckstein(at)cs.com
Date: Oct 03, 1999
Subject: Re: Instrument panel cutouts
I had no trouble using a flycutter and the instrument screw template. I've heard that the flycutter does a better job because the punch distorts the aluminum. If your panel is anything like mine, you'll spend a lot more time on the misc. holes than the standard instrument holes. Be sure to have a nibler and a file assortment. Brian Eckstein 6A finishing ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Instrument panel cutouts
Date: Oct 03, 1999
> > >Listers.. > >I'm contemplating making my own panel cutouts on my -8 instrument >panel which means purchasing the 2 1/4, 3 1/8 hole cutter, and the >screw template.. approx. $150.00 >Heck, what's another 150 tacked to the $3800 I've already spent >on tools and tool boxes. > >What do others do ?? Gulf Avionics quoted $300.00 to cut the panel. > >Thanks, >Doug Gardner -8A >Palm Harbor Fla >Interior Cabin Doug, I tried a borrowed megabuck instrument punch. It required MAJOR effort to crank it through that thick panel. So, I just marked all my hole centers, and used my fly cutter. I made test cuts on scrap aluminum, and set the cutter for a slightly too tight fit on the instrument faces. I then finished them off with a swivel debur tool and emery cloth. I think it worked fine, and didn't cost tons of cash. I also borrowed the hole template, maybe you could do the same? Brian Denk RV8 N94BD mounting and rigging the tail ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Persyk" <dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Instrument panel cutouts
Date: Oct 03, 1999
Doug, The common punches are flat and punch the whole circumference at once. Greenlee (sp?) punches have an elliptical male cutting edge which shears rather than punches. The Greenlee punches are much more expensive, I recommend a fly cutter and 200 rpm or so in the drill press. Use lots of clamps. It is very hard to get the fly cutter radius adjusted just right. Once you have it at the right radius (determined on many scrap trials), make a cut 1/2 way through some 0.062 stock. When you need to cut another hole that size, use the half-cut template to adjust the radius. This will get you repeatable hole diameters to within a few thousandths. Dennis Persyk 6A finishing kit Hampshire, IL C38 -----Original Message----- From: Gardner, Douglas (GA01) <Douglas.Gardner(at)iac.honeywell.com> Date: Sunday, October 03, 1999 5:05 PM Subject: RV-List: Instrument panel cutouts > >Listers.. > >I'm contemplating making my own panel cutouts on my -8 instrument >panel which means purchasing the 2 1/4, 3 1/8 hole cutter, and the >screw template.. approx. $150.00 >Heck, what's another 150 tacked to the $3800 I've already spent >on tools and tool boxes. > >What do others do ?? Gulf Avionics quoted $300.00 to cut the panel. > >Thanks, >Doug Gardner -8A >Palm Harbor Fla >Interior Cabin > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: FLARV8N(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 03, 1999
Subject: RV-8 Jig
Listers, I have an RV-8 jig, very straight, very nice. I will let it go for the wood cost. It is located in Jupiter, Fla. 561-748-2429 Scott ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Bundy" <ebundy(at)access1.net>
Subject: Re: lean to peak?
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Personally, I think there is more mis-information on this subject than any other. I have talked to many knowledgeable people about this over the past 5 years, and the people that have the most weight (aircraft-knowledge wise, not physically) all say that you should lean small, 4 cylinder opposed engines to peak whenever at or below 75% power. I have heard this from the Lycoming factory, Kas Thomas, Rod Farlee, and Greg Travis, all of whom I highly regard. This is especially true for Lycomings, which tend to have valve problems that are exacerbated by crud building up on the valve stem. The best way to accumulate said crud is to operate richer than peak. Why? Because unburned fuel is flowing past valves which are *hotter* than they would be at peak EGT. Believe it or not, your CHT temps will be the highest at 40-100 degrees rich of peak. They will actually run cooler at peak, and much less unburned fuel will be trying to stick to them. To quote from the 0320 Operator's Manual: "Best Economy Cruise (approximately 75% power or less) - Operate at peak EGT, or if desired, drop 50 degrees on rich side of peak EGT." I asked a Lycoming tech why one would "desire" to run 50 degrees rich, and he said that a (very) few airframe manuals suggest 50 degrees rich for addition cooling due to high CHT temps specific to that installation. He went on to say that as long as your CHT's stay in line you absolutely should run at peak EGT at 75% and below. And as an added bonus you save gas. What a deal. I have never been able to nail anyone down on a max "absolute" EGT value. Personally, mine have never gone above 1470 in a climb and in cruise are around 1350. I have my EGT limit set at 1480, and I have heard that a practical operating limit is around 1550. The temp limit of a valve IS absolute, irrespective of altitude, which is why the "100LL burning valve" argument makes no sense to me. I don't think valves burn because of mixture, (at or below 75%) I think they burn from poor seating due to deposits building up on them. You are in far more danger of causing valve sticking and seating problems by operating rich. I too, have heard that you cannot harm an engine below 75% with the mixture knob. I believe it. Even if you operate lean of peak, the engine runs rough not due to detonation, but because the mixture is too lean to support complete combustion, and all of the cylinders have a different level of power output due to distribution inequities. Your EGT's also drop dramatically, which is just the opposite of what they would do if you were in fact causing detonation. Verbosity off. Ed Bundy - Eagle, ID - RV6-A First flight 11/20/96 ebundy@access1.net http://home.cwix.com/~ebundy@cwix.com/ > Norm at Premier Engines told me that I should be running my Lycoming 100 > degrees rich of the peak temp of the highest cylinder. He says that people > used to say 25 or 50 degrees but with the 100LL nowadays it needs to be > lower to insure not burning valves. He said to find peak by leaning out > until you hear rpm drop then back up a bit. > So, is the 100LL thing a myth? Peak temps vary with altitude. Is 1050 at > 6,000' different on the valves than 1400 at sea level? Isn't temp limit of > a valve an absolute and not vary with altitude? Benedict stated that when > under 75% power setting that mixture settings could not damage the engine. > If this is true then why not lean to peak? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 03, 1999
From: George McNutt <gmcnutt(at)intergate.bc.ca>
Subject: Elevator Control Stops
Anyone have any good suggestions for installing the up elevator control stop on the RV6. The stop is hidden in behind bulkhead F612, and almost impossible to mark its location or drill with the elevator horns in the way. Also the stop will only contact one elevator horn unless I devise a tapered stop, is that acceptable? George McNutt, 6-A Langley B.C. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 03, 1999
From: "Gary A. Sobek" <rv6flier(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: lean to peak?
> > Norm at Premier Engines told me that I should be > running my Lycoming 100 > > degrees rich of the peak temp of the highest > cylinder. He says that > people > > used to say 25 or 50 degrees but with the 100LL > nowadays it needs to be > > lower to insure not burning valves. He said to > find peak by leaning out > > until you hear rpm drop then back up a bit. > > So, is the 100LL thing a myth? Peak temps vary > with altitude. Is 1050 at > > 6,000' different on the valves than 1400 at sea > level? Isn't temp limit > of > > a valve an absolute and not vary with altitude? > Benedict stated that when > > under 75% power setting that mixture settings > could not damage the engine. > > If this is true then why not lean to peak? Pick up a copy of the Lycoming Flyer Key Reprints at AirVenture 2000. Turn to Page 36 and start reading. Read Lycoming Service Instruction 1094D. Lycoming Flyer page 38: "First we must know that cruise power for Lycoming normally aspirated engines is generally considered to be 55% to 75% of the maximum power for which the engine is rated. At these power settings, the engine may be leaned at any altitude." "Once cruise power has been set, leaning to best economy should be standard procedure as damage to engine will not occur from leaning at cruise power settings." I start leaning my O-320 as soon as I start the engine. I go full rich for takeoff below 3,000 MSL. At 1,000 AGL, I start leaning. Typical I lean till it misses then richen till it smooths. This is very close to peak but usually only 15-25 F of peak. Typical EGT in climb is BELOW 1,475 F and cruise can reach 1,600 F. I have been operating this way for the last 2 years 430 flight hours. I had the engine apart at 307 hours after the Ford Thunderbird ran into the airplane. No problems found from my operation. Only problem found was the bent crank caused by the Thunderbird. Lycoming Flyer page 41: "Best Economy Mixture as it relates to the EGT system begins at peak. For all practical purposes with Lycoming engines, peak EGT is right at the edge of the Best Economy mixture, and is our only practical point of reference in the Best Economy Mixture range. At the manufacturers recommended cruise power, peak EGT causes a slight loss of horsepower usually reflected in two or three miles per hour of airspeed." "Best Power Mixture, or sometimes termed Maximum Power Range, as depicted on the EGT gage, is in the range of 100 F on the rich side of peak." "Again we repeat that maximum leaning (peak EGT) does not damage an engine at the engine manufacturers recommended cruise power. Damage is caused by maximum leaning at higher than recommended cruise power where the manuals do not spell it out or allow it, and when the aircraft does not have a complete set of reliable engine instruments protecting the powerplants." Hope this research for you helps me in the Copperstate Dash. I doubt that I will be the fastest 160 but sure hope to be the fastest 160 RV-6. Permission to reprint granted by Textron Lycoming "Key Reprints" so long as the context of information remans intact and appropriate credit is given. FAA A & P EAA Tech Counselor ==== Gary A. Sobek "My Sanity" RV-6 N157GS O-320 Hartzell, So. CA, USA Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Lousmith(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 03, 1999
Subject: Free RV-4 Fuselage Jig
I have an RV-4 fuselage jig in my hanger. It is free to a good home. I am located just west of Rocky Mount, NC. Louis Smith Lousmith(at)aol.com 252-937-4905 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: F1Rocket(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 03, 1999
Subject: RV6A gearleg Intersection fairings
Listers, We have been working on some RV6A intersection fairing molds, and seem to be coming along fairly nicely. If you are an RV6A builder or flyer and are interested in our gearleg intersection kit, please send your email address and snail mail address to me at F1Rocket(at)aol.com. I am putting together a list so that I can contact you when they are complete. Prices for these will be the same as the RV6, $150/set of 4. Thanks! Scott ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Alex Peterson" <alexpeterson(at)usjet.net>
Subject: Re: Elevator Control Stops
Date: Oct 03, 1999
George, I put a .125" or so plate of aluminum for a stop. To drill it, I drilled it with it BEHIND the aft bulkhead. Then, when riveting it, I put in front of the bulkhead. No big deal. Alex Peterson Maple Grove, MN ---------- > From: George McNutt <gmcnutt(at)intergate.bc.ca> > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV-List: Elevator Control Stops > Date: Sunday, October 03, 1999 7:07 PM > > > Anyone have any good suggestions for installing the up elevator control > stop on the RV6. > > The stop is hidden in behind bulkhead F612, and almost impossible to > mark its location or drill with the elevator horns in the way. > > Also the stop will only contact one elevator horn unless I devise a > tapered stop, is that acceptable? > > George McNutt, 6-A > Langley B.C. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 03, 1999
From: Thomas McIntyre <bogeybrother(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Copperstate Race
If anyone out there is racing in the Copperstate race this weekend and has some useful race experience they'd like to share contact me off the list. Thanks Tom ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 03, 1999
From: "Michael J. Robbins" <kitfox(at)gte.net>
Subject: Re: Taildragger Pull Handle
>Mike: Thanks for the details, now I hate to admit that I lost your >original post. Do you have an address, e-mail or phone number for B.A.S.? > >Harry Crosby (HCRV6(at)aol.com) B.A.S. is 1-888-255-6566 Mike Robbins ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rv8abuild(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Subject: Re: Search Engine
In a message dated 10/3/1999 8:37:06 PM Central Daylight Time, charles(at)onramp.net writes: << Yes--Ive tried several searches and nothing came back. >> ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rv8abuild(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Subject: Re: Search Engine
In a message dated 10/3/1999 8:37:06 PM Central Daylight Time, charles(at)onramp.net writes: << Yes--Ive tried several searches and nothing came back. >> I've noticed that since Matt added the other archives, you have to select "RV" in the archive list each time you do a search. Otherwise, you automatically do a search in the aerobatic archive. Is this why you guys are having trouble? Jerry Carter ________________________________________________________________________________
From: F1Rocket(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Subject: Pitot tubes and brackets for Rocket builders
Rocket and RV Listers, I just got a new shipment of non-heated pitot tubes in. These are the "L" shaped pitot tubes. Cost is $95.50. I also have the pitot tube bracket kits for $55. Let me know off-line if you are interested at F1Rocket(at)aol.com. Thanks! Scott Team Rocket ________________________________________________________________________________
From: F1Rocket(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Subject: Copperstate
Hey Listers, I will be at Copperstate Fly-in from October 6th through the 10th. Please come by and introduce yourself. I would be very pleased to meet all of you that will be there. I will have a catalog there to browse thru, or just come by to chat. Copperstate is a fantastic Fly-in, so see you there! Scott Team Rocket, Inc. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: Charlie Kuss <chaskuss(at)miami.gdi.net>
Subject: Piper pitot tube wanted
Listers, Does anyone out there in RV land have a Piper pitot tube (blade style) that they might wish to sell? Charlie Kuss RV-8 dimpling all my wing parts Boca Raton, Fl. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: lm4(at)juno.com
Subject: Experimentation
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Darn, I just deleted a post that spoke of experimentation and had references tacked to the end of the post. The post ended with " if their were not so many lawyers circling overhead ". Can someone send me a copy of that post. I wanted to read the references. Larry (too handy with the delete finger) Mac Donald lm4(at)juno.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: Chris Browne <cebrowne(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Drilling the Engine Mount
I have a set in my engine mount when it is bolted to the firewall. For the first time, I wish that something was not pre-drilled. The alignment between the firewall pilot holes and the engine mount was pretty poor. I used the Frank Justice notes, but in order to get the pilot holes somewhere within the engine mount holes I had to tug and push on the engine mount while drilling. I now have a set worked into the engine mount that requires a cargo strap hooked within the mount to get the final bolt in. I am considering cutting and rewelding, but part of me also tells me to leave it alone for good since all the bolts are in the mount. I can't be the first one to go through this. Chris Browne -6A finish Atlanta ________________________________________________________________________________
From: flyhars(at)attglobal.net
Subject: Re: Elevator Control Stops
Date: Oct 04, 1999
George: There was an article in the RVator 1998 fifth issue page 5, a picture showing a better way to install a modified stop. It is for the RV-8 but could be used on the RV-6. If you can't locate the article, I will send a copy to you. Regards: Harvey Sigmon - RV-6AQB- Ready to install wings ----- Original Message ----- From: Alex Peterson <alexpeterson(at)usjet.net> Sent: Sunday, October 03, 1999 11:24 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Elevator Control Stops > > George, I put a .125" or so plate of aluminum for a stop. To drill it, I > drilled it with it BEHIND the aft bulkhead. Then, when riveting it, I put > in front of the bulkhead. No big deal. > > Alex Peterson > Maple Grove, MN > > ---------- > > From: George McNutt <gmcnutt(at)intergate.bc.ca> > > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > > Subject: RV-List: Elevator Control Stops > > Date: Sunday, October 03, 1999 7:07 PM > > > > > > Anyone have any good suggestions for installing the up elevator control > > stop on the RV6. > > > > The stop is hidden in behind bulkhead F612, and almost impossible to > > mark its location or drill with the elevator horns in the way. > > > > Also the stop will only contact one elevator horn unless I devise a > > tapered stop, is that acceptable? > > > > George McNutt, 6-A > > Langley B.C. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RClayp5888(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Subject: Re: Sam's Cowl, was Landing lights, alternatives?
Sam's phone # is 941-6754-4493. Bob Claypool finishing ________________________________________________________________________________
From: lm4(at)juno.com
Subject: Re: Instrument panel cutouts
Date: Oct 04, 1999
>Listers.. >I'm contemplating making my own panel cutouts on my -8 instrument >panel which means purchasing the 2 1/4, 3 1/8 hole cutter, and the >What do others do ?? Gulf Avionics quoted $300.00 to cut the panel. >Thanks,Doug Gardner -8A Doug, From day one i've never had a problem with fly cutting, and you probably have such a tool for making lightning holes. Just keep it moving slowly,150 to 200 RPM, in your drill press and keep lots of oil or coolant on it. Use a sacrificial plate under the panel so you don't go thru the panel and cut up the table of the press. The templates are in your acft. spruce catalog. The list has had some bad experience with both paper and metal templates. It doesn't seem to be the templates so much as the different radii from different brand instruments. Tool makers who would do this type of work from scratch would paint a dye onto the cut surface and place the instrument face down on the panel and use an awl to scratch around the circle and into the mounting holes. Then they could find the centers, center punch and drill or fly cut as needed. HTH Larry Mac Donald lm4(at)juno.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: aquila33(at)webtv.net (dann mann)
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Subject: Re: Instrument panel cutouts
Most aluminum will cut nicely wth a router. Buy a spiral upcuttng 1/8" dia. bit. Make a plywood pattern of your panel. Slip a collar on your router base and clamp pattern to panel. Cut. Finish with a fine file. Corrosion proof it. Paint it. Send it to me and I will screenprint all your markings very professionally or you can stick all sorts of tacky labels all over it. Dan Peterman ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stephen J. Soule" <SSoule(at)pfclaw.com>
Subject: AN 822-4D
Date: Oct 04, 1999
The AN 822-4D is the little 90 degree elbow fitting that goes on the top of the Cleveland brakes. According to the plans, it is supposed to point forward and connect to the brake line coming down the RV-6A main gear leg. I can get this little guy started about one full turn without much force, to point forward with a wrench and reasonable force and get it to point aft with some difficulty. Getting it around another 180 degrees to point forward again seems out of the question. This is a pipe threaded piece. Is it OK to back it off to where it points forward or should I go back to the shop and really "crank" it another half turn? I don't want to (a) break the fitting or (b) strip the threads in the Cleveland brake. On the other hand, I don't want it to leak. Steve Soule Huntington, Vermont Learning but hopefully not the hard way ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: builders bookstore <winterland(at)rkymtnhi.com>
Subject: Re: Plane choice and Pilot Size
John Chalker wrote: > > Hell all. I have been lurking for sometime in this group. I have one > simple question. > > I am 290 pounds and 6'2''. Will I comfortably fit into an RV4, RV6 or RV8. > I ruled out an RV3 due to Gross weight limit. > I am 6'2" and height-wise, fit comfortably in my -6, even with headsets on and a nice plush cushion. However there is not alot of excess room. If I were any taller, I would have had to settle for a rather thin seat cushion or would have had to modify the floor ribs to lower the seat. Both very do-able things which would have been worth the effort if needed. I believe Vans has also, at one time made a modified version of the -6 with a taller canopy and larger rudder. I'm not sure what the status of that is. Call Van's and ask. Your other option, of course is to find one and go sit in it. Then you will know for sure. Andy Gold Builder's Bookstore http://www.buildersbooks.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "george murphy" <george(at)atlantic.net>
Subject: Re: AN 822-4D
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Your best bet is to tap the thread out little bit at a time until you get it where you want it George ________________________________________________________________________________
From: pcondon(at)csc.com
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Subject: Re: Instrument panel cutouts
I used the circle hole cutters from Greelee available from Home Depo. These hole cutters are of the tooth-round-cylinder type with a removable drive adapter. I put a particle board backing plate behind the pannel- held in with the instrument mounting holes I marked. Used the two hole cutters 2.25 & 3 1/8 and finished up with a cylinder drum sander that was just shy in diameter of my holes...available in a Sears tool store. The job looks 100% & I get many favorable comments....total cost for cutters 25$..... dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net on 10/03/99 07:00:24 PM Please respond to rv-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Re: RV-List: Instrument panel cutouts Doug, The common punches are flat and punch the whole circumference at once. Greenlee (sp?) punches have an elliptical male cutting edge which shears rather than punches. The Greenlee punches are much more expensive, I recommend a fly cutter and 200 rpm or so in the drill press. Use lots of clamps. It is very hard to get the fly cutter radius adjusted just right. Once you have it at the right radius (determined on many scrap trials), make a cut 1/2 way through some 0.062 stock. When you need to cut another hole that size, use the half-cut template to adjust the radius. This will get you repeatable hole diameters to within a few thousandths. Dennis Persyk 6A finishing kit Hampshire, IL C38 -----Original Message----- From: Gardner, Douglas (GA01) <Douglas.Gardner(at)iac.honeywell.com> Date: Sunday, October 03, 1999 5:05 PM Subject: RV-List: Instrument panel cutouts > >Listers.. > >I'm contemplating making my own panel cutouts on my -8 instrument >panel which means purchasing the 2 1/4, 3 1/8 hole cutter, and the >screw template.. approx. $150.00 >Heck, what's another 150 tacked to the $3800 I've already spent >on tools and tool boxes. > >What do others do ?? Gulf Avionics quoted $300.00 to cut the panel. > >Thanks, >Doug Gardner -8A >Palm Harbor Fla >Interior Cabin > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <rv8er(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Drilling the Engine Mount
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Chris: I had the same problem. On mine, the pilot holes were 1/4". What I did was got two of them to line up, put a 1/4" bolt through a brass bushing that had a 1/4" ID, and a 3/8" OD, and put it into the mount. This assures that these two holes were in the center of the two holes on the mount. Now just use the mount as a template to widen the rest of them. You don't want to have preload on the mount when you drill it. There is a picture of this on my website, http://members.home.net/rv8er/engine.htm Good luck..you are not the first to go through this! Paul Besing RV-6A (197AB) Arizona http://members.home.net/rv8er Finish Kit -----Original Message----- From: Chris Browne <cebrowne(at)earthlink.net> Date: Monday, October 04, 1999 1:40 PM Subject: RV-List: Drilling the Engine Mount > >I have a set in my engine mount when it is bolted to the firewall. For >the first time, I wish that something was not pre-drilled. The >alignment between the firewall pilot holes and the engine mount was >pretty poor. I used the Frank Justice notes, but in order to get the >pilot holes somewhere within the engine mount holes I had to tug and >push on the engine mount while drilling. I now have a set worked into >the engine mount that requires a cargo strap hooked within the mount to >get the final bolt in. I am considering cutting and rewelding, but part >of me also tells me to leave it alone for good since all the bolts are >in the mount. I can't be the first one to go through this. > >Chris Browne >-6A finish >Atlanta > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <rv8er(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Instrument panel cutouts
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Call Steve Davis and see what he would charge. If you have it all done in Panel Planner, and all he has to do is put it on the CNC machine, it may not be that expensive, and all of your holes and squares will fit each instrument/avionics absolutely perfectly. His work is very precise, and reasonable. Here is his website: http://members.aol.com/panelcut/ Paul Besing RV-6A (197AB) Arizona http://members.home.net/rv8er Finish Kit -----Original Message----- From: Gardner, Douglas (GA01) <Douglas.Gardner(at)iac.honeywell.com> Date: Sunday, October 03, 1999 10:05 PM Subject: RV-List: Instrument panel cutouts > >Listers.. > >I'm contemplating making my own panel cutouts on my -8 instrument >panel which means purchasing the 2 1/4, 3 1/8 hole cutter, and the >screw template.. approx. $150.00 >Heck, what's another 150 tacked to the $3800 I've already spent >on tools and tool boxes. > >What do others do ?? Gulf Avionics quoted $300.00 to cut the panel. > >Thanks, >Doug Gardner -8A >Palm Harbor Fla >Interior Cabin > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: Bill Von Dane <bvondane(at)atmel.com>
Subject: HS-813PP
If anyone is interested, I had a problem with one of my HS-813PP mount brackets. It was apparently bent incorrectly at the factory and I did not catch it until I tried to mount the HS skeleton to the jig. The offending bracket's hole is not in-line with it's mate, so it needs to be replaced... I Guess I need to learn how to drill out rivets anyway! I have contacted Van's regarding a replacement, and have started on the VS in the mean time... I have pictures of the bracket and my empennage progress on my web site: http://members.tripod.com/rv8tor/logbook/emp/index.htm Bill Von Dane -8A empennage bvondane(at)atmel.com http://members.tripod.com/rv8tor ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: Gary Zilik <zilik(at)bewellnet.com>
Subject: Re: AN 822-4D
"Stephen J. Soule" wrote: > > The AN 822-4D is the little 90 degree elbow fitting that goes on the top of > the Cleveland brakes. According to the plans, it is supposed to point > forward and connect to the brake line coming down the RV-6A main gear leg. > I can get this little guy started about one full turn without much force, to > point forward with a wrench and reasonable force and get it to point aft > with some difficulty. Getting it around another 180 degrees to point > forward again seems out of the question. One turn does not seem far enough to me. Make sure the fitting is lubricated before insertion in the brake caliper. Use fuel lube or some kind of anti seize compound on the treads of the fitting. One trick is to install the fitting as tight as you dare, remove it and install it again. With each installation the fitting will go in a little deeper Gary Zilik > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: Chris Browne <cebrowne(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Drilling the Engine Mount
Paul, I did precisely that and used the bushing. I used all the tricks I could find, including yours. It is now drilled so it's to late, but trying to center any two holes put at least one of the others *outside* the engine mount holes - unacceptable. So, I simply took my best guess at one of them and work from there. The preload is there, so I am trying to figure out whether to cut and reweld or leave it alone. Chris Paul Besing wrote: > > Chris: > > I had the same problem. On mine, the pilot holes were 1/4". What I did was > got two of them to line up, put a 1/4" bolt through a brass bushing that had > a 1/4" ID, and a 3/8" OD, and put it into the mount. This assures that > these two holes were in the center of the two holes on the mount. Now just > use the mount as a template to widen the rest of them. You don't want to > have preload on the mount when you drill it. There is a picture of this on > my website, > > http://members.home.net/rv8er/engine.htm > > Good luck..you are not the first to go through this! > > Paul Besing > RV-6A (197AB) Arizona > http://members.home.net/rv8er > Finish Kit > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Browne <cebrowne(at)earthlink.net> > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Monday, October 04, 1999 1:40 PM > Subject: RV-List: Drilling the Engine Mount > > > > >I have a set in my engine mount when it is bolted to the firewall. For > >the first time, I wish that something was not pre-drilled. The > >alignment between the firewall pilot holes and the engine mount was > >pretty poor. I used the Frank Justice notes, but in order to get the > >pilot holes somewhere within the engine mount holes I had to tug and > >push on the engine mount while drilling. I now have a set worked into > >the engine mount that requires a cargo strap hooked within the mount to > >get the final bolt in. I am considering cutting and rewelding, but part > >of me also tells me to leave it alone for good since all the bolts are > >in the mount. I can't be the first one to go through this. > > > >Chris Browne > >-6A finish > >Atlanta > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rick Caldwell" <racaldwell(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Rear Pins on Sliding Canopy
Date: Oct 04, 1999
I am just finishing the sliding canopy on my -6. My last problem to overcome are the two rear pins. They are very tight in the plastic blocks after the front latch pulls the canopy up snug. I can not open the canopy by just unlatching and pulling the latch back. I have to tug a little on the rear. This will not be possible after I permanently attach the rear skirt. No problem from inside; I just push up and back on the rear. The holes in the plastic block are drilled 1/4" for the 1/4" pins. Tom @ Van's said do not enlarge them. Do I have another solution? Once I finish this plane, I WILL want to get inside. Rick Caldwell RV-6 #24187 Getting ready to fit wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rv8abuild(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Subject: Re: Plane choice and Pilot Size
In a message dated 10/4/1999 9:27:22 AM Central Daylight Time, john.chalker(at)infoseek.com writes: << I am 290 pounds and 6'2''. Will I comfortably fit into an RV4, RV6 or RV8. I ruled out an RV3 due to Gross weight limit. >> ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: Bob Skinner <bskinner(at)vcn.com>
Subject: empenage fairing mold
Will the person who has our empenage fairing that is used as a mold to make a one layer laminate please contact me at: bskinner(at)vcn.com Bob Skinner 1995 RV6 (sold) Buffalo, WY ________________________________________________________________________________
From: pcondon(at)csc.com
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Subject: Re: Drilling the Engine Mount
Black & Decker Bullet bits helped me drill & locate the centers for me. BE SURE TO REAM to final size with a quality reamer ( the mount & the aircraft ) after your centers have been properly found. The Drill bit does a bad job of hole roundness & sizing when compared to a reamer...I didn't appreciate this untill I saw the difference & Now I am a beleiver.....hope the tid-bit helps rv8er(at)home.com on 10/04/99 04:30:12 AM Please respond to rv-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Re: RV-List: Drilling the Engine Mount Chris: I had the same problem. On mine, the pilot holes were 1/4". What I did was got two of them to line up, put a 1/4" bolt through a brass bushing that had a 1/4" ID, and a 3/8" OD, and put it into the mount. This assures that these two holes were in the center of the two holes on the mount. Now just use the mount as a template to widen the rest of them. You don't want to have preload on the mount when you drill it. There is a picture of this on my website, http://members.home.net/rv8er/engine.htm Good luck..you are not the first to go through this! Paul Besing RV-6A (197AB) Arizona http://members.home.net/rv8er Finish Kit -----Original Message----- From: Chris Browne <cebrowne(at)earthlink.net> Date: Monday, October 04, 1999 1:40 PM Subject: RV-List: Drilling the Engine Mount > >I have a set in my engine mount when it is bolted to the firewall. For >the first time, I wish that something was not pre-drilled. The >alignment between the firewall pilot holes and the engine mount was >pretty poor. I used the Frank Justice notes, but in order to get the >pilot holes somewhere within the engine mount holes I had to tug and >push on the engine mount while drilling. I now have a set worked into >the engine mount that requires a cargo strap hooked within the mount to >get the final bolt in. I am considering cutting and rewelding, but part >of me also tells me to leave it alone for good since all the bolts are >in the mount. I can't be the first one to go through this. > >Chris Browne >-6A finish >Atlanta > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: Gary Zilik <zilik(at)bewellnet.com>
Subject: Re: priming systems
> Hi, > I am curious what the majority of people are doing to prime their > engines. > > 1. Manual plunger type primer. > 2. Valve & electric fuel pump to prime > 3. No primer system. Just using the accelerator pump from the carb. > I have installed option 2. GPZ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: Chris Browne <cebrowne(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Drilling the Engine Mount
I just got off the phone with Tom. The engineering staff maintains that the bolt holes are compression joints, so the hole size in the firewall is *not* critical. Yeah, I was surprised too, but he suggested that I pick one or two offending holes and open them up. His points included an engine mount replacement which would likely require that the holes be enlarged for the new mount. So, the message seems to be "don't sweat it" even if some the holes are figure eights coz they don't line up. Hmmmmmm... Chris Browne -6A finish Atlanta pcondon(at)csc.com wrote: > > Black & Decker Bullet bits helped me drill & locate the centers for me. BE SURE > TO REAM to final size with a quality reamer ( the mount & the aircraft ) after > your centers have been properly found. The Drill bit does a bad job of hole > roundness & sizing when compared to a reamer...I didn't appreciate this untill I > saw the difference & Now I am a beleiver.....hope the tid-bit helps > > rv8er(at)home.com on 10/04/99 04:30:12 AM > > Please respond to rv-list(at)matronics.com > > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > > Subject: Re: RV-List: Drilling the Engine Mount > > > Chris: > > I had the same problem. On mine, the pilot holes were 1/4". What I did was > got two of them to line up, put a 1/4" bolt through a brass bushing that had > a 1/4" ID, and a 3/8" OD, and put it into the mount. This assures that > these two holes were in the center of the two holes on the mount. Now just > use the mount as a template to widen the rest of them. You don't want to > have preload on the mount when you drill it. There is a picture of this on > my website, > > http://members.home.net/rv8er/engine.htm > > Good luck..you are not the first to go through this! > > Paul Besing > RV-6A (197AB) Arizona > http://members.home.net/rv8er > Finish Kit > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Browne <cebrowne(at)earthlink.net> > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Monday, October 04, 1999 1:40 PM > Subject: RV-List: Drilling the Engine Mount > > > > >I have a set in my engine mount when it is bolted to the firewall. For > >the first time, I wish that something was not pre-drilled. The > >alignment between the firewall pilot holes and the engine mount was > >pretty poor. I used the Frank Justice notes, but in order to get the > >pilot holes somewhere within the engine mount holes I had to tug and > >push on the engine mount while drilling. I now have a set worked into > >the engine mount that requires a cargo strap hooked within the mount to > >get the final bolt in. I am considering cutting and rewelding, but part > >of me also tells me to leave it alone for good since all the bolts are > >in the mount. I can't be the first one to go through this. > > > >Chris Browne > >-6A finish > >Atlanta > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BumFlyer(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Subject: Burlington Fly in
Since no one has rendered a report Iwill. It was bigger than ever with around 50 to 60 RVs. The field had 69 planes total. Scott Risan brought the blue RV-6A, which I note now sports the weird wing tips which look like a WW I plane in planform. It also had one of those LRI ( I think) AOA instalations on the left wing outboard. A hole top and bottom. Electric Bob's talk was extremely well received. Thanks Bob. Somehow I couldn't break through the swarm of fans long enough to thank him for the great job. Vetterman gave his usual great talk on exhaust systems, as did Bob Brashear. Unfortunately the Orndorffs had to cancel at the last moment due to a death in the family. Sorry Becki. The hit of the day in my opinion was Doc Baker's fuselage and John STewart's award winning plane. They had a great forum and were assisted by a Sherwin Williams factory rep, who answered a lot of questions re painting. It was a good turn out, although too many left early due to forecast high winds. As it turned out no damage was incurred. Thanks to all who showed up and sorry I missed talking to very many. D Walsh ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mitch Faatz <mfaatz(at)sagent.com>
Subject: Drilling the Engine Mount
Date: Oct 04, 1999
> >I just got off the phone with Tom. The engineering staff maintains >that the bolt holes are compression joints, so the hole size in the >firewall is *not* critical. I received the same feedback. I did have one bolt hole that was just just a little elongated after getting them all drilled on my firewall, so I filled that side of the hole up with JB Weld and clean-drilled the hole the next day. I knew it wasn't necessary, but I just felt a little better about it after doing it. Mitch Faatz San Jose, CA 727MF (reserved) RV-6A Engine baffle / plenum / cowl Pres. / Newsletter Editor: Bay Area RVators http://www.skybound.com/BARV http://www.aftershock.org/rv.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BumFlyer(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Subject: Re: Rear Pins on Sliding Canopy
In a message dated 10/4/99 10:44:45, racaldwell(at)hotmail.com writes: << The holes in the plastic block are drilled 1/4" for the 1/4" pins. Tom @ Van's said do not enlarge them. Do I have another solution? >> P. S. Always listen to Tom ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BumFlyer(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Subject: Re: Rear Pins on Sliding Canopy
In a message dated 10/4/99 10:44:45, racaldwell(at)hotmail.com writes: << The holes in the plastic block are drilled 1/4" for the 1/4" pins. Tom @ Van's said do not enlarge them. Do I have another solution? >> Almost everyone puts some kind of handle on the outside. Mine is a piece of the ubiquitous 3/4 angle which is rivetted to the rear of the left side skirt toward the rear. It provides just enough tug to get it started. it is oriented for maximum streamlining and to allow an upward and rearward tug. It is rounded and looks great, but then it is my baby. The fanciest I have seen is a retractable ring cabinet pull which is too sexy for words. It is heavier than mine but may be less drag. Everyone's is different. If I ever build another I will paint a donald duck and have the tab be his bill :+) D Walsh ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy J. Pflanzer" <rpflanze(at)iquest.net>
Subject: Re: Rear Pins on Sliding Canopy
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Rick, Most folks rivet a short piece of aluminum angle to the side skirt near the rear to use as a hold/pull. I put one on each side in the last two holes holding the side skin to the canopy frame. Randy Pflanzer N417G RV-6 "Painting.....still" -----Original Message----- From: Rick Caldwell <racaldwell(at)hotmail.com> Date: Monday, October 04, 1999 12:29 PM Subject: RV-List: Rear Pins on Sliding Canopy > >I am just finishing the sliding canopy on my -6. My last problem to >overcome are the two rear pins. They are very tight in the plastic blocks >after the front latch pulls the canopy up snug. I can not open the canopy >by just unlatching and pulling the latch back. I have to tug a little on >the rear. This will not be possible after I permanently attach the rear >skirt. No problem from inside; I just push up and back on the rear. > >The holes in the plastic block are drilled 1/4" for the 1/4" pins. Tom @ >Van's said do not enlarge them. Do I have another solution? > >Once I finish this plane, I WILL want to get inside. > >Rick Caldwell >RV-6 #24187 Getting ready to fit wings > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: "Scott Kuebler" <skuebler(at)cannondesign.com>
Subject: Re: Paint Booth...
Gary and others, I use the same method as Gary for priming parts in my basement during the winter months. One problem to watch out for with the cross-ventilation method is that if your exhaust fan is sucking out more air than the open window across the room can supply, then other holes in the house will compensate for the lack of air. The most likely source for the extra supply will come from the path of least resistance: furnace/boiler vents, and fireplace chimneys. This can cause a problem with carbon monoxide from the heating supply and smoke from the fireplace (if it is burning, don't ask me how I know!) My recommendation would be to open the exhaust window a 1/4 of the way, and open the supply window all of the way. I also made partitions out of 2x4's and plastic vapor barrier, including a plastic ceiling on the floor joists above. This has been very effective at keeping odors out of the rest of the house. Scott Kuebler RV-6a (wings) Buffalo, NY >>> Gary Zilik 10/02 5:02 PM >>> Up here at 8480 MSL in Pine Junction, CO I have the same problems with priming in the winter. I also have an unfinished basement and have used it year round for priming. The secret is to keep fresh air flowing through the basement at all times. In the end of the basement I use for priming I have installed a box fan in the window. The fan is mounted on plywood that fits the window opening and is simple to install/deinstall. I then go to the other end of the basement, and open up another window about 1/4 open. I fire the boiler up to keep the basement warm and start painting. The cross flow through the basement set up by the fan and open window is more than enough to keep the smell from going places it is not supposed to be. I adjust the fan speed as necessary to keep the flow just right since I am pumping $$$ through the boiler heating the outside world. This has worked great even at 22 below zero. I once opened an upstairs window thinking the flow down the stairs would help keep the smell going outside. Worked great, but froze my wife's prize plant sitting near the open window. We do learn from our mistakes. Gary Zilik RV-6A Pine Junction, CO - Winter is on it's way. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: donspawn(at)juno.com
Subject: Re: Frozen Engine Bolts
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Paul: I would use penitrating oil, then buy the cheap impact tool set with the 3/8 drive so you can use a socket allen wrench, then use a torch( be carful with the heat) then use the impact, Don Jordan ~ 6A fuselage ~ Arlington,Tx ~ donspawn(at)juno.com ======================================================== >I have some 5/16 Allen head bolts that are where the oil cooler >connects to, >and they are absolutely impossible to get out. I have used a pretty >hefty >Allen wrench with a breaker bar on it, and they won't budge...any >ideas? > >Paul Besing >RV-6A (197AB) Arizona >http://members.home.net/rv8er >Finish Kit ________________________________________________________________________________
From: donspawn(at)juno.com
Subject: Re: w-623
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Its is one of those pieces of al( strip) that gets a part number on the drawings but not on the part. Don Jordan ~ 6A fuselage ~ Arlington,Tx ~ donspawn(at)juno.com ===================================================== > >i am building a rv-6. cant find w-623.do you fabricate it or what.it >goes at >the outb.end of the fuel tank.also how does it fasten to tanks. > > TCRV6(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: Bill Von Dane <bvondane(at)atmel.com>
Subject: Paint Schemes...
Hi all... i have been recieving a large number of e-mail on how i did the sample paint schemes on my web site, so I have added information on how you can do it for yourself on my web site: http://members.tripod.com/rv8tor/paint/index.htm HAVE FUN! Bill Von Dane -8A empennage bvondane(at)atmel.com http://members.tripod.com/rv8tor ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: "dgmurray" <dgmurray(at)telusplanet.net>
Subject: Re: AN 822-4D
> >The AN 822-4D is the little 90 degree elbow fitting that goes on the top of >the Cleveland brakes. According to the plans, it is supposed to point >forward and connect to the brake line coming down the RV-6A main gear leg. >I can get this little guy started about one full turn without much force, to >point forward with a wrench and reasonable force and get it to point aft >with some difficulty. Getting it around another 180 degrees to point >forward again seems out of the question. > >This is a pipe threaded piece. Is it OK to back it off to where it points >forward or should I go back to the shop and really "crank" it another half >turn? I don't want to (a) break the fitting or (b) strip the threads in the >Cleveland brake. On the other hand, I don't want it to leak. > >Steve Soule >Huntington, Vermont >Learning but hopefully not the hard way > Steve - Have you used Fuel lube on the threads? You should have the threads lubed and they will seal better and allow you to get the last rotation you need to line up everything. You should not loosen a pipe thread to obtain alignment. That would leave the joint slightly loose and allow a possible leak. Hope this helps. Doug Murray RV-6 Plumbing inder the cowl Southern Alberta ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: Chris Browne <cebrowne(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Rear Pins on Sliding Canopy
Rick, It sounds like the hole in the block does not match the angle of the pin. I found an easy way to get the holes custom drilled in those UHMW blocks, so you can try two new blocks and refit them as follows. Basically the technique involves wood blocks, a miter box, and a drill press. First, take a wood block the same size as the UHMW block and drill a compound angle hole in the block using the tilt table on the drill press for the first angle, and a 7 degree ( I think) wedge of wood 90 degrees to the table angle to set the other. A drill press vice is handy. Place the block on the pin and close the canopy. Watch how the block goes into U-bracket. Adjust the angles as necessary until you get a block that slides easily into the bracket. I found I needed 4 or 5 wedges of various angles and used about 6 wood blocks or so. When you are happy, drill a UHMW block, place it on the pin and close the canopy. Then clamp the block into the bracket and recheck the fit by opening and closing the canopy. When you are happy, drill through the block. BTW, I found that the pins were welded to differents angles - one was 7 and the other 4 degrees. If you use this technique, the pins should slip into the blocks without binding. You should wait until you are happy with the fit of the rear part of the slider to drill these blocks since there is no adjustment once these are mounted. Chris Browne -6a finish Atlanta "Randy J. Pflanzer" wrote: > > Rick, > > Most folks rivet a short piece of aluminum angle to the side skirt near the > rear to use as a hold/pull. I put one on each side in the last two holes > holding the side skin to the canopy frame. > > Randy Pflanzer N417G RV-6 > "Painting.....still" > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rick Caldwell <racaldwell(at)hotmail.com> > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Monday, October 04, 1999 12:29 PM > Subject: RV-List: Rear Pins on Sliding Canopy > > > > >I am just finishing the sliding canopy on my -6. My last problem to > >overcome are the two rear pins. They are very tight in the plastic blocks > >after the front latch pulls the canopy up snug. I can not open the canopy > >by just unlatching and pulling the latch back. I have to tug a little on > >the rear. This will not be possible after I permanently attach the rear > >skirt. No problem from inside; I just push up and back on the rear. > > > >The holes in the plastic block are drilled 1/4" for the 1/4" pins. Tom @ > >Van's said do not enlarge them. Do I have another solution? > > > >Once I finish this plane, I WILL want to get inside. > > > >Rick Caldwell > >RV-6 #24187 Getting ready to fit wings > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: donspawn(at)juno.com
Subject: Re: Instrument panel cutouts
Date: Oct 04, 1999
>I'm contemplating making my own panel cutouts on my -8 instrument >panel which means purchasing the 2 1/4, 3 1/8 hole cutter, and the >screw template.. approx. $150.00 >Heck, what's another 150 tacked to the $3800 I've already spent >on tools and tool boxes. > >What do others do ?? Gulf Avionics quoted $300.00 to cut the panel. > >Thanks, >Doug Gardner -8A >Palm Harbor Fla >Interior Cabin this is a message I sent to the list about a month ago. Don Jordan ~ 6A fuselage ~ Arlington,Tx ~ donspawn(at)juno.com ===================================================== Just got my instrument panel back from the water cutting machine. Reamit Tech (the Company) cut 8-3 1/8 & 10 - 2 1/4 holes for me for $30.00. I was thrilled, the DG is a ATI-3 square hole & the 2 with 7 o'clock cut outs were done. I sent Chuck the dimensions based on Center & bottom of the panel & he did that CADCAM thing. I used a dial caliper & looks like he held .002 of inch tolerance. The radius of the 7 0'clock cut-outs were off a LITTLE (that is a rv builder's term) cause I can't read a radius gauge. I plan on trying to find the mounting holes with a center drill & use flush head screws. If anyone has a better approach , please let me know. Reamit Tech has a web at Chuck Rearic .or. Kevin wright 817-461-8048 FAX = 8049 Arlington, Tx I have received 4 of my NEW Van's gauges & they are great. I have 2 new SW fuel gauges for sale. After VAn came out the new line, I wanted all the gauges to match. Don Jordan ~ 6A fuselage ~ Arlington,Tx ~ donspawn(at)juno.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mikel(at)dimensional.com
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Subject: priming systems
>I am curious what the majority of people are doing to prime their engines. > 1. Manual plunger type primer. > 2. Valve & electric fuel pump to prime > 3. No primer system. Just using the accelerator pump from the carb. >> I have method #2 and it works quite well. I plummed it to the front two cylinders (if they are firing, the rest of the cylinders are going to follow right along) and it works well. Not putting one in I think is not a good idea; you won't need it until you need it. One of these days, you will be out in the cold, having tied down outside, with the engine warming system not plugged in (sorry, sir, we can't plug that in out here. Fire codes, you know.)(?). After you get all the ice off your wings, you will ask your also-cold battery to crank over a cold engine and be thankful you had the extra help of the primer system. Just my opinion, after having done just that.............. There are also some archival discussions on using the accelerator pump. Michael ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ian Belmore" <ian(at)ibelmore.demon.co.uk>
Subject: RV6 Fuselage Jig in the UK
Date: Oct 04, 1999
I have a Fuselage Jig available in West Sussex, UK Made of Wood, only one Fuselage built. Ian Belmore G-RVIB Fuse out of Jig (at last!) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kerrjb(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Subject: How much does the firewall insulation weigh?
I purchased firewall insulation from TeamRocket and the 3X4 foot sheet weighs 10 pounds. That seems extremely heavy to me. How much does the insulation Orndorf and others sell weigh? Bernie Kerr, 6A wings and gear mount bolts in, SE Fla ________________________________________________________________________________
From: IELHAI(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Subject: Re: Piper pitot tube wanted
I tried some salvage places for mine, but no luck. Finally, had to by a new one at about the same cost as the Cessna type. Good luck! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: Mike Wills <willsm(at)manta.spawar.navy.mil>
Subject: Re: Piper pitot tube wanted
I bought mine a couple of years ago from Wentworth. Right around $50 I think. Mike Wills RV-4 canopy willsm(at)manta.spawar.navy.mil ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls(at)aeroelectric.com>
Subject: Re: priming systems
>>I am curious what the majority of people are doing to prime their engines. > >> 1. Manual plunger type primer. >> 2. Valve & electric fuel pump to prime >> 3. No primer system. Just using the accelerator pump from the carb. >> > >I have method #2 and it works quite well. I plummed it to the front two >cylinders (if they are firing, the rest of the cylinders are going to follow >right along) and it works well. Not putting one in I think is not a good >idea; you won't need it until you need it. One of these days, you will be >out in the cold, having tied down outside, with the engine warming system >not plugged in (sorry, sir, we can't plug that in out here. Fire codes, you >know.)(?). After you get all the ice off your wings, you will ask your >also-cold battery to crank over a cold engine and be thankful you had the >extra help of the primer system. Consider a 4-port version of #2. It has some decided advantages which include (1) no fuel lines and fittings inside the cockpit for primer system and (2) if you put a needle valve in the system, you can calibrate the primer flow rate so that the engine will run at some useful power setting with the mixture at cutoff. If you plumb the primer system directly to the engine from what you plan to be the fullest tank throughout the flight, you have a redundant fuel delivery system that will function if the main delivery system is cut off for any reason. Had a builder put this system in his Long-Ez a about 8 years ago and he called me a year so so later to report that it kept him airborne to an airport after the mixture control on his carburetor had come unhooked. Bob . . . //// (o o) ===========o00o=(_)=o00o======== < Independence Kansas: the > < Jurassic Park of aviation. > < Your source for brand new > < 40 year old airplanes. > ================================ http://www.aeroelectric.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: EARL FORTNER <e.fortner(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Instrument panel cutouts
You could buy your own hole punch. If using a flycutter I suggest you clamp the panel to a piece of plywood and then proceed to cut slowly. The plywood gives you extra leverage to hold onto incase the flycutter digs in. lm4(at)juno.com wrote: > > > >Listers.. > >I'm contemplating making my own panel cutouts on my -8 instrument > >panel which means purchasing the 2 1/4, 3 1/8 hole cutter, and the > >What do others do ?? Gulf Avionics quoted $300.00 to cut the panel. > >Thanks,Doug Gardner -8A > > Doug, > From day one i've never had a problem with fly cutting, and you > probably have such a tool for making lightning holes. Just keep it moving > slowly,150 to 200 RPM, in your drill press and keep lots of oil or > coolant on it. Use a sacrificial plate under the panel so you don't go > thru the panel and cut up the table of the press. > The templates are in your acft. spruce catalog. The list has had > some bad experience with both paper and metal templates. It doesn't seem > to be the templates so much as the different radii from different brand > instruments. > Tool makers who would do this type of work from scratch would paint a dye > onto the cut surface and place the instrument face down on the panel and > use an awl > to scratch around the circle and into the mounting holes. Then they could > find the centers, center punch and drill or fly cut as needed. HTH > > Larry Mac Donald lm4(at)juno.com > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: jrdial <jrdial@hal-pc.org>
Subject: Wing Kit
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Friend of mine is still looking for a wing kit for RV-6/A at any stage of construction. Respond to jrdial@hal-pc.org ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Charlie Oglesby" <coglesby(at)ithink.net>
Subject: RV6 - 965 lbs
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Listers, How many RV6 builders were able to keep the weight of the completed airplane to 965 pounds? How was the airplane equipped? What steps did you take to avoid an overweight airplane? Thank You, Charlie Oglesby ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "V. E. Welch" <Vwelch(at)knownet.net>
Subject: IFR Maintenance Requirements
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Gentlemen, I am weighing the pros and cons of equipping my aircraft for IFR work. As part of the decision making process I am looking into the maintenance requirements. Could some of you who have aircraft equipped for IFR share some of your experiences to include approximate costs? Vince Welch RV-8A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: flyhars(at)attglobal.net
Subject: Re: Piper pitot tube wanted
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Charlie: I live close to an airplane junk yard, I will check for you if any are available, do you want it heated or not? I want one myself also, I used one on my last home built. Let me know off line if you are still looking for one and how much you want to pay. Harvey Sigmon RV6-QB Installing wings ----- Original Message ----- From: Charlie Kuss <chaskuss(at)miami.gdi.net> Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 9:04 AM Subject: RV-List: Piper pitot tube wanted > > Listers, > Does anyone out there in RV land have a Piper pitot tube (blade style) > that they might wish to sell? > Charlie Kuss > RV-8 dimpling all my wing parts > Boca Raton, Fl. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: SALNED2131(at)cs.com
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Subject: Re: RV8-List Digest: 10/03/99
JUST A HINT BEFORE CLOSING YOUR LANDING GEAR BOXES INSTALL THE FUEL VENT LINES. I DIDN'T AND AM FIGHTING THEM NOW. GOOD LUCK..............ED 80127 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: FLIBOB(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Subject: Copperstate
Can somebody help please? What is Copperstate? I assume it is an RV fly-in in Pheonix. I would like to get a good look at a bunch of RV's. Is this the place? Thanks Bob Graves Flibob(at)aol.com RV-8 emp Indianapolis ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <rv8er(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Copperstate
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Yes you are correct. It is a fairly large fly in, usually with 30-40 RV's each year, plus warbirds, airshows, etc, etc. You can get info at: http://www.copperstate.org. Paul Besing RV-6A (197AB) Arizona http://members.home.net/rv8er Finish Kit -----Original Message----- From: FLIBOB(at)aol.com <FLIBOB(at)aol.com> Date: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 12:29 AM Subject: RV-List: Copperstate > >Can somebody help please? >What is Copperstate? >I assume it is an RV fly-in in Pheonix. >I would like to get a good look at a bunch of RV's. >Is this the place? >Thanks > >Bob Graves >Flibob(at)aol.com >RV-8 emp >Indianapolis > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 05, 1999
From: Scott <acepilot(at)mwt.net>
Subject: Scott Van Artsdalen
Scott... Got your email...replied to you at unionsafe.com....bounced back to me. Do you have another address? -- --Scott-- 1986 Corben Junior Ace N3642 RV-4 under construction (tail feathers) Gotta Fly or Gonna Die! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 03, 1999
From: "David A. Barnhart" <dave(at)davebarnhart.com>
Subject: Re: Paint Booth...
>Seriously though, I need a good "safe" way to prime my parts.... Here's how I turned my garage into a paint booth: 1. The garage has a side dor opening to the outside. I bought enough furnace filters to cover the entire door, and taped them in place. 2. I bought four of the 22-inch box fans, placed them in line with the garage door, and closed the garage door on them. I blocked the remaining space on both sides of the fans with some plywood. The fans would pull the (filtered) air in through the side door and create a very nice airflow down the length of the garage and out through the fans. Just prior to painting I would spray the floor and walls down to keep down the dust. I painted the entire airplane in there, one part at a time, and I get LOTS of compliments on the paint job. Best Regards, Dave Barnhart RV-6 N601DB Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: F1Rocket(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Subject: RV6 Gearleg and Intersection fairing Pictures
Listers, I finally got some pictures taken of the RV6 Gearleg fairing kit (includes the intersection fairings). This is not the RV6A yet, just the -6. If you would like to see a picture of them, please email me and I will forward off the list. Tomorrow (Tuesday) will be the last day that I can email them to you for awhile since I will be at the Copperstate Airshow and then right after that will be at Arlington, TX for the Southwest Regional Airshow. For those of you that live in the Southeast, we will also have someone at the Southeast Regional Flyin as well. I look forward to meeting all of you at one of these flyins...please come on by. I will have some intersection fairings and gearlegs fairings on display, as well as some other stuff that is compatible for the RVs. Scott Team Rocket ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: Jeremy Benedict <jwb(at)europa.com>
Subject: Re: Plane choice and Pilot Size
Hi! Will you fit? In short, likely, but it depends. In my rookie years at OSH, I helped several hundred into Van's static RVs. People truly are built differently; some 6'5" guys fit better than 6'2" others. It really depends on how your height and weight are proportioned. The best way to find out is to sit in one, making careful observation of that particular seat position and cushion thickness... FWIW, I'm tall at 6'3" with somewhat long legs, 190lbs even distribution. I've flown/rode in front/back/left/right in all RV seating arrangements, except RV-3 :-(, all with STANDARD 3" cushions, some with booster cushions, all fit "fine" or better. ~Jeremy jwb(at)europa.com Coming November 1 to the Web...it's what you've been waiting for... Disclaimer: My opinions are mine only and don't represent any company. >> >> Hell all. I have been lurking for sometime in this group. I have one >> simple question. >> >> I am 290 pounds and 6'2''. Will I comfortably fit into an RV4, RV6 or RV8. >> I ruled out an RV3 due to Gross weight limit. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: Warren Gretz <gretz_aero(at)h2net.net>
Subject: Heated Pitot tubes and mounting Brackets
I received a large order of two different kinds of HEATED Pitot tubes recently and also offer an excellent Chrome finished Mounting Bracket Kit that will mount either pitot tube. The pitot tubes are the AN5812 type now called the PH502-12CR, and also the AN5814 pitot tube which has a static pressure source built into it. If you are interested in any of these items plus several other I carry, contact me off line for a set of my product flyers and low prices. Warren Gretz Gretz Aero 303-770-3811 gretz_aero(at)h2net.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steven DiNieri" <capsteve(at)wzrd.com>
Subject: Re: waiting...
Date: Oct 05, 1999
> > ~Jeremy jwb(at)europa.com > > Coming November 1 to the Web...it's what you've been waiting for... > > ohhh... stop teasing us Jeremy.... ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Salinas Air Show
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: "S. R. Hales" <hales(at)garlic.com>
> >Did anyone go to the Salinas Air show? I had heard Wayne Handley >had a accident with the Turbo Raven. I seen him perform at Reno >this year and what a show. Does anyone have details about this? I saw Handley perform on Sat. but was not there Sun. News reports here say he fractured two vertebrae, is undergoing surgery, and will probably walk again. The $600,000 TurboRaven was pretty much totaled. His words from the hospital were, "I don't want to have a negative impact on the airshow (pun intended)." Evidently he was near the end of his routine; loss of power is suspected as the cause. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: gforrest <gforrest(at)nwc.net>
Subject: Re: Piper pitot tube wanted
Charlie I bought a piper heated pitot about a year ago from dodson international. They have a web page at http://www.dodson.com. The cost was $125. Jerry Forrest LA, CA Charlie Kuss wrote: > > Listers, > Does anyone out there in RV land have a Piper pitot tube (blade style) > that they might wish to sell? > Charlie Kuss > RV-8 dimpling all my wing parts > Boca Raton, Fl. > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Rear Pins on Sliding Canopy
From: Scott R McDaniels <smcdaniels(at)juno.com>
Date: Oct 05, 1999
>I am just finishing the sliding canopy on my -6. My last problem to >overcome are the two rear pins. They are very tight in the plastic >blocks >after the front latch pulls the canopy up snug. I can not open the >canopy >by just unlatching and pulling the latch back. I have to tug a little >on >the rear. This will not be possible after I permanently attach the >rear >skirt. No problem from inside; I just push up and back on the rear. > >The holes in the plastic block are drilled 1/4" for the 1/4" pins. >Tom @ >Van's said do not enlarge them. Do I have another solution? > >Once I finish this plane, I WILL want to get inside. > >Rick Caldwell >RV-6 #24187 Getting ready to fit wings > I always listen very carefully to what Tom says, but, I do enlarge these holes slightly. One of the problems with machining/drilling UHMW plastic is that it can creap/distort. Drilling a hole with a 1/4 " drill doesn't usually leave you with a 1/4 " hole (try and slip the drill bit in to the hole after drilling it and you will see what I mean). I use a drill index of number and letter indexed drill bits to go up slightly in size to get a slip fit as required. I then use a tapered reamer or a counter sink cutter and counter bore the outer portion of the hole to give the pins something bigger to aim at (the canopy can move around quite a bit when it is opened because of prop blast / gusty winds / etc.)when it is being closed. You will still have a close fit on the pin in the lower portion of the hole (still meeting Tom's recommendation). Scott McDaniels Former RV-6A owner North Plains OR. smcdaniels(at)juno.com These opinions and ideas are mine alone, and they may not reflect the opinions and ideas of my employer. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Rudder pedal (hanging) fix question
From: Scott R McDaniels <smcdaniels(at)juno.com>
Date: Oct 05, 1999
> >What does this consist of? - Welding on 8 small gussets. - Are there any non-weld, non-remove fixes >available? - Yes. Inspect the rudder peddle assy. at regular intervals (and don't abuse them). - > >Is it a problem for all or just those who brace on the pedals when >tense? - Lets just say that only a "few" sets have been returned to Van's with damage. Also testing showed that as originally supplied the peddle assy met the FAR 23 requirement for rudder peddle strength by 150%. BTW... one of the first customers who broke his peddles (and started the ball rolling on this whole thing) broke them again after having the gussets welded on...Hmmm. But if pilots are able to break them (regardless how strong they are) A fix has been made available to prevent a failure from becoming a safety situation. Scott McDaniels Former RV-6A owner North Plains OR. smcdaniels(at)juno.com These opinions and ideas are mine alone, and they may not reflect the opinions and ideas of my employer. > >hal > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 05, 1999
Subject: Re: How much does the firewall insulation weigh?
In a message dated 10/4/99 4:53:46 PM Pacific Daylight Time, Kerrjb(at)aol.com writes: << I purchased firewall insulation from TeamRocket and the 3X4 foot sheet weighs 10 pounds. That seems extremely heavy to me. How much does the insulation Orndorf and others sell weigh? >> The lightest stuff costs the most. The FF30AHT7 Soundcoat polyimide foam that some of us have used is about $200 for a sheet that will do two 6/6As. It is aluminized mylar backed, 96" X 48" X 3/4" thk piece weighs less than 5 lbs. -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <rv8er(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: RV6 Gearleg and Intersection fairing Pictures
Date: Oct 04, 1999
Send a pic to me if you would, Scott...I will put it up on my website, too.. Paul -----Original Message----- From: F1Rocket(at)aol.com <F1Rocket(at)aol.com> Date: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 2:52 AM Subject: RV-List: RV6 Gearleg and Intersection fairing Pictures > >Listers, > >I finally got some pictures taken of the RV6 Gearleg fairing kit (includes >the intersection fairings). This is not the RV6A yet, just the -6. If you >would like to see a picture of them, please email me and I will forward off >the list. Tomorrow (Tuesday) will be the last day that I can email them to >you for awhile since I will be at the Copperstate Airshow and then right >after that will be at Arlington, TX for the Southwest Regional Airshow. For >those of you that live in the Southeast, we will also have someone at the >Southeast Regional Flyin as well. I look forward to meeting all of you at >one of these flyins...please come on by. I will have some intersection >fairings and gearlegs fairings on display, as well as some other stuff that >is compatible for the RVs. > >Scott >Team Rocket > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 05, 1999
Subject: Re: Salinas Air Show
In a message dated 10/4/99 10:32:03 PM Pacific Daylight Time, mcomeaux(at)cmc.net writes: << Did anyone go to the Salinas Air show? I had heard Wayne Handley had a accident with the Turbo Raven. I seen him perform at Reno this year and what a show. Does anyone have details about this? >> My boss was there and said that Wayne was doing his trademark steep (almost straight down) approach with the Turbo Raven in beta and maybe rounded out too late at the bottom, nearly pancaking in. No apparent indications of mechanical difficulty but hard to know for sure. He is reportedly in serious condition with spinal injuries. He has been one of our favorites over the years and all of our good thoughts are with him following this unfortunate incident. -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: n3773 <n3773(at)mciworld.com>
Subject: electronic ignition
So NOW he tells me :=) I followed your discussion of your ignition problems with great interest. Gremlins are a fascinating part of any kind of mechanical creation. I am new to aviation, but was a "gearhead" in high school and roadraced grand prix motorcycles from age 16 to 25 so have a good feeling for troubleshooting. It seems that you inadvertantly broke the cardinal rule of engine tuning. You changed more than one thing at a time. If you had noticed the worn mag parts and said, "ok I'll change them after testing the electronic ignition" your problems would have been obvious. I am writing this not to criticize you, you did what probably 98% of us would have done. (including me) I just find it amusing. I guess, your trials have allowed me to remember some similar mistakes that I have made, and chuckle at myself. Thanks for the post. It has reminded me of the importance of not making more that one "improvement" at a time. I don't subscribe to the realtime list, so if you think this could be of value to others, please post this for me. Thank you. Best regards, Don Mei ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 1999
From: George McNutt <gmcnutt(at)intergate.bc.ca>
Subject: First Flight
I am posting this for Glen Gordon of Surrey B.C. who is not on the Rv-list. Glen made the first flight in RV-6 C-GGJG on October 3rd from the Langley B.C. 1900 foot runway. Weather was perfect for a first flight and the aircraft performed flawlessly. Glen played hookey from work today and was still wearing the RV grin while making a few adjustments before his second flight. C-GGJG is 0-360 powered with C/S prop and full panel . George McNutt 6-A Langley B.C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: John Chalker <john.chalker(at)infoseek.com>
Subject: Plane Choice and Pilot Size
Date: Oct 05, 1999
I want to say thanks to everyone who replied to my thread. Great responses. I have narrowed it down to an RV8 or a Rocket. Now all I need to do is strap both on for feel. :o) My wallet is dreading the $60,000 test flight :o) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: PASSPAT(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 05, 1999
Subject: Re: RV6 Gearleg and Intersection fairing Pictures
Please e-mail me the photo's of the int. fairings Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Charles Rowbotham" <crowbotham(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: First Flight
Date: Oct 05, 1999
George, Please relay to Glen: CONGRATULATIONS & WELL DONE !!!! Chuck & Dave Rowbotham RV-8A (about to start the canopy) Niantic, CT *************************** >From: George McNutt <gmcnutt(at)intergate.bc.ca> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV-List: First Flight >Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 23:34:59 -0700 > > >I am posting this for Glen Gordon of Surrey B.C. who is not on the >Rv-list. > >Glen made the first flight in RV-6 C-GGJG on October 3rd from the >Langley B.C. 1900 foot runway. > >Weather was perfect for a first flight and the aircraft performed >flawlessly. Glen played hookey from work today and was still wearing the >RV grin while making a few adjustments before his second flight. > >C-GGJG is 0-360 powered with C/S prop and full panel . > >George McNutt 6-A >Langley B.C. > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MRawls3896(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 05, 1999
Subject: Re: Plane choice and Pilot Size
I'm 5'4" I'll use a thick cusion. :) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MRawls3896(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 05, 1999
Subject: Re: Paint Booth...
I used the same method on a show car. It worked great for me to. M Rawls (Just finished Enpenage) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: OrndorffG(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 05, 1999
Subject: Re: How much does the firewall insulation weigh?
The insulation we sell weighs 1 pound per linear foot (4 x 1) so the same size piece of ours would weight 3 pounds. Let us know if we can help you. George and Becki Orndorff ________________________________________________________________________________
From: pcondon(at)csc.com
Date: Oct 05, 1999
Subject: Re: How much does the firewall insulation weigh?
I choose NOT to use the insulation because I wanted to view the firewall,engine-mount-brackets, passthru-holes I drilled, chaffing points, rudder peddle area(s), evidence of smoking rivets, leaks-----whatever. I figured the insulation in everyother aircraft I owned was more of a problem than a help. I prefer to be able to eyeball the area for problems. As far a noise is concerned- these aircraft are a noisy lot to begin with---for 79.00$ I went to the kit noise canceling headsets-- converted on my Dave Clarks--noise problem solved. Weight problem solved- no heavy insulation, Safety problem solved-no insulation to mask problems, Heat problem solved- I can add another heat muff inline to my single heat muff if additional heat is required (the heat that may have stayed if I insulated). Just an opinion..... Kerrjb(at)aol.com on 10/04/99 05:08:58 PM Please respond to rv-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RV-List: How much does the firewall insulation weigh? I purchased firewall insulation from TeamRocket and the 3X4 foot sheet weighs 10 pounds. That seems extremely heavy to me. How much does the insulation Orndorf and others sell weigh? Bernie Kerr, 6A wings and gear mount bolts in, SE Fla ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Busick" <panamared(at)brier.net>
Subject: Re: PM1000II Harness PTT Wiring
Date: May 16, 1999
I bought a PS 501 and I got the wiring harness from PS Engineering. They did not include wire for the PTT switch, and I like you are wonding how to do this. By the way the wiring harness through Vans from PS Engineering was $90.00. Vans was a little shocked, as Vans only charge $50.00 to do the radio harness! Bob Busick >I asked PS Engineering these questions and they suggested I buy the harness >from them. I hope listers will be more informative! > >Dennis Persyk 6A finishing kit >Hampshire, IL C38 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ABAYMAN(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 05, 1999
Subject: Re: WAYNE HADLEY
B. Reg.No.: 17HE M/M: EXP Desc: EXP/1998 GILES G-750 (TURBO RA Activity: Other Phase: Maneuver GA-A/C: General Aviation Descr: DURING AN AIRSHOW PERFORMANCE, THE ACFT WAS EXECUTING A LOOP, THE PILOT DID NOT PULL UP IN TIME TO COMPLETE THE MANEUVER, AND THE ACFT CRASHED NORTH OF RWY 26 ON A PARALLEL TAXIWAY, SALINAS, CA. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 05, 1999
From: Chris Browne <cebrowne(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Post-mortem on the Engine Mount
Well, I made a discovery last night. Seems that the engine mount distorts when it is torqued unevenly (DUH!). It was drilled in relaxed state, but I was attempting to insert and torque the bolts as I went. I was torquing the nuts and then trying to install the bolts, but as I messed with the mount last night I found that the more I torqued the bolts on the bottom of the mount, the worse the alignment was for the last few bolt holes. I discovered that with the mount relaxed (the way it was drilled) I could get the bolts in with only a little fiddling and I had to do only a little filing on one hole. With the mount merely resting on the firewall with the nuts loose the mount slid on the bolts. Since the mount was drilled in a relaxed state, this shouldn't have been a suprise, I guess, and I can live with it. For anyone who hasn't drilled the mount, I think that Tom's advise is well taken about the pilot holes. A little anti-sieze on the bolts helps alot, too Chris Browne -6A finish Atlanta ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <rv8er(at)home.com>
Subject: Intersection Fairing Pics
Date: Oct 05, 1999
I have posted a picture of Team Rocket's intersection and gear fairings at: http://members.home.net/rv8er/gear.htm Paul Besing RV-6A (197AB) Arizona http://members.home.net/rv8er Finish Kit ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Van Artsdalen, Scott" <svanarts(at)unionsafe.com>
Subject: Scott Van Artsdalen
Date: Oct 05, 1999
Sorry, I'm doing some upgrades to our network. I am here now. Alternatively you can send mail to svanarts(at)jps.net or scott_rv4(at)yahoo.com -- Scott VanArtsdalen, MCSE Network Administrator Union Safe Deposit Bank 209-946-5116 svanarts(at)unionsafe.com -----Original Message----- From: Scott [mailto:acepilot(at)mwt.net] Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 6:19 PM Subject: RV-List: Scott Van Artsdalen Scott... Got your email...replied to you at unionsafe.com....bounced back to me. Do you have another address? -- --Scott-- 1986 Corben Junior Ace N3642 RV-4 under construction (tail feathers) Gotta Fly or Gonna Die! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Van Artsdalen, Scott" <svanarts(at)unionsafe.com>
Subject: Scott Van Artsdalen
Date: Oct 05, 1999
Sorry about that. Been working on our firewall. Try svanarts(at)jps.net or scott_rv4(at)yahoo.com -- Scott VanArtsdalen, MCSE Network Administrator Union Safe Deposit Bank 209-946-5116 svanarts(at)unionsafe.com -----Original Message----- From: Scott [mailto:acepilot(at)mwt.net] Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 6:19 PM Subject: RV-List: Scott Van Artsdalen Scott... Got your email...replied to you at unionsafe.com....bounced back to me. Do you have another address? -- --Scott-- 1986 Corben Junior Ace N3642 RV-4 under construction (tail feathers) Gotta Fly or Gonna Die! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 05, 1999
From: Larry Olson <lolson(at)doitnow.com>
Subject: 0320-A1A For Sale
Posting for a friend: For Sale Lycoming 0320-A1A Complete 0 SMOH New Slick Mags & Harnesses New Carb New Prop Governor New Vacuum Pump or Hyd Pump Alternator Starter Fuel Pump All logs since new Rebuild by local reputable shop $ 12,500 FOB Phoenix, AZ Plug N Play... You can reply to me and I'll forward. Larry Olson Cave Creek, AZ RV6 - Fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GStorey826(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 05, 1999
Subject: Re: RV6 Gearleg and Intersection fairing Pictures
Scott: e-mail photo's of the intersection fairings. Reference our e-mail Monday 10/4/99. G. Storey RV6A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <rv8er(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: RV6 Gearleg and Intersection fairing Pictures
Date: Oct 05, 1999
I have posted these pics at: http://members.home.net/rv8er/gear.htm Paul Besing RV-6A (197AB) Arizona http://members.home.net/rv8er Finish Kit -----Original Message----- From: GStorey826(at)aol.com <GStorey826(at)aol.com> Date: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 4:23 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: RV6 Gearleg and Intersection fairing Pictures > >Scott: e-mail photo's of the intersection fairings. Reference our e-mail >Monday 10/4/99. >G. Storey >RV6A > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HCRV6(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 05, 1999
Subject: Re: How much does the firewall insulation weigh?
George: Have you ever run any flammability tests on the insulation you sell? I've done some very unscientific tests on some of the other very light insulation by using a match held to a small piece for an ignition source. The aluminum mylar backing (or the adhesive, not sure which) on that material continued burning vigorously after the match was removed. Harry Crosby (HCRV6(at)aol.com) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Consultant3, Cmtsd" <cmtsd.consultant3(at)cmtsd.mea.com>
Subject: Heated Pitot tubes and mounting Brackets
Date: Oct 05, 1999
Hi Warren, I received your product flyers a while ago, but I'm embarrassed to say that I've misplaced them. If you would be so kind as to send them to me again, I promise not to lose them again. Thanks, Ken Brown 4440 Date Ave. La Mesa, CA 91941-6415 -----Original Message----- From: Warren Gretz [mailto:gretz_aero(at)h2net.net] Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 8:42 PM Subject: RV-List: Heated Pitot tubes and mounting Brackets I received a large order of two different kinds of HEATED Pitot tubes recently and also offer an excellent Chrome finished Mounting Bracket Kit that will mount either pitot tube. The pitot tubes are the AN5812 type now called the PH502-12CR, and also the AN5814 pitot tube which has a static pressure source built into it. If you are interested in any of these items plus several other I carry, contact me off line for a set of my product flyers and low prices. Warren Gretz Gretz Aero 303-770-3811 gretz_aero(at)h2net.net --- --- --- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Lenleg(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 05, 1999
Subject: Re: rv8list-fitting fuel tanks built by Aviacomp
Fellow 8ers: I had my fuel tanks built by Aviacomp. I am having some difficulty getting them to fit properly in relation to the leading edge skins on top and the pre-drilled holes on the main spar. There is about an 1/8" gap on the top and yet the bottom skins butt right up?? I also can't seem to pull the tanks down far enough on the spar to reach the pre-drilled holes. I have used the cargo straps and all the muscle I have Help!! Len in NC 8A, ready to skin wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: rv8list-fitting fuel tanks built by Aviacomp
Date: Oct 05, 1999
>From: Lenleg(at)aol.com >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv8-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV-List: Re: rv8list-fitting fuel tanks built by Aviacomp >Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 13:45:11 EDT > > >Fellow 8ers: > >I had my fuel tanks built by Aviacomp. I am having some difficulty getting >them to fit properly in relation to the leading edge skins on top and the >pre-drilled holes on the main spar. > >There is about an 1/8" gap on the top and yet the bottom skins butt right >up?? > >I also can't seem to pull the tanks down far enough on the spar to reach >the >pre-drilled holes. I have used the cargo straps and all the muscle I have > >Help!! > >Len in NC >8A, ready to skin wings Len, You did fully drill all the tank components to the wing before sending the parts to be sealed, right? Even after doing so, it's not uncommon to have them not fit quite right after the sealing process. Sometimes the sealant can build up around the end rib and interfere with the splice plate at the leading edge skin. I had to file the plate a bit so my tanks would seat up snug against the l.e. skin. Difficulties with the tank fit at the main spar and wing skins can be due to excessive sealant used during the tank rear baffle and Z-brackets installations. I know this doesn't help correct the situation very much, but maybe it will lead you to places to look for the cause. Brian Denk RV8 N94BD mounting and rigging tail ________________________________________________________________________________
From: F1Rocket(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 05, 1999
Subject: Re: How much does the firewall insulation weigh?
In a message dated 10/5/99 6:53:32 PM Eastern Daylight Time, HCRV6(at)aol.com writes: The aluminum mylar backing (or the adhesive, not sure which) on that material continued burning vigorously after the match was removed. >> The insulation offered by Team Rocket is the same insulation used in the new Boeing Aircraft and is not flamable. The weight of the 3-ply material is alittle heavier, but offers alot of noice dampening. We also have the 2-ply and single-ply, which obviously is considerably lighter. All of these are flame resistant. Scott Team Rocket ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 05, 1999
From: bramsec <bramsec(at)idirect.com>
Subject: Rear Canopy Rivits
RV6 tilt canopy rear section. The manual says to open holes to #19 size then pop rivit. I did not open them up ( Left them at 1/8"). Should I drill out the rivits and open the holes up. I was told the only holes that needed opening where those where screws are used.( to protect the plexiglass from the sharp edges of the screw threads.) I have noticed everytime I stand on the wing there is creeking sounds from the rear canopy area, I guess the fuselage is slightly twisting and transmitting this to the plexiglass. Just passed final inspection should fly next week. Regards Peter (RV6 Toronto) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: TBRV(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 05, 1999
Subject: wire holes in VS
Listers, I'm thinking about drilling holes for future wiring through my ribs in the VS. Was considering drilling out the forward tooling holes to 7/16ths. I'm not putting any lights up there, but may want to add an antennae there, eventually. Are most of you putting your wires in the forward end of the ribs or the aft end? Will it matter later on during assembly with fuse? I'll consider any info before drilling my ribs. Thanks. Troy Black -8 emp. Great things have humble beginnings. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 06, 1999
From: Frank van der Hulst <frankv(at)ee.cit.ac.nz>
Subject: Re: wire holes in VS
TBRV(at)aol.com wrote: > Listers, I'm thinking about drilling holes for future wiring through my ribs > in the VS. Was considering drilling out the forward tooling holes to > 7/16ths. I'm not putting any lights up there, but may want to add an > antennae there, eventually. Are most of you putting your wires in the > forward end of the ribs or the aft end? Will it matter later on during > assembly with fuse? I'll consider any info before drilling my ribs. Thanks. I'm not sure about -8 VS construction; I'm building a -6. And I built my VS some years ago, so I'm vague on details. But anyway,... The -6 VS has 2 ribs forward of the forward spar and 3 ribs aft (or maybe vice versa?). I drilled a set of holes both forward and aft of the forward spar, so that wherever's easiest is where my wiring will go (if I ever put any in). Before rivetting the VS skin on: 1. Put a grommet in the hole in the middle rib. 2. Feed pull-strings through all the holes. Frank. RV-6 fuselage out of the jig Marton, NZ. -- frankv(at)ee.cit.ac.nz Frank van der Hulst My home page is http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~frankvdh ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: How much does the firewall insulation weigh?
From: Scott R McDaniels <smcdaniels(at)juno.com>
Date: Oct 05, 1999
Weight problem solved- no heavy insulation, Safety problem >solved-no >insulation to mask problems, Heat problem solved- I can add another >heat muff >inline to my single heat muff if additional heat is required (the heat >that may >have stayed if I insulated). Just an opinion..... > > I am not meaning to be an advocate for firewall insulation ( I am always preaching keep the planes light), but insulation on the firewall is worth while if you can avoid adding lots of weight. The reason is that the main heat problem that you need to solve is to keep the heat on the front (engine) side of the firewall. Keeping heat in the cockpit is not a problem without firewall insulation since it stays some what warm in the engine compartment. I don't think firewall insulation was ever meant to help keep the cockpit warm. I think it is generally to insulate the cockpit from the heat and the noise of the engine compartment. The problem is that in the summer (particularly places that get quite hot) you can feel the heat radiating off of the bare metal firewall. Scott McDaniels Former RV-6A owner North Plains OR. smcdaniels(at)juno.com These opinions and ideas are mine alone, and they may not reflect the opinions and ideas of my employer. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tim Lewis" <timrv6a(at)earthlink.net>
Date: Oct 05, 1999
Subject: Re: How much does the firewall insulation weigh?
I like the 1" thick Orcotek strip blanket available from ACS. The 20" x 30" piece I have left over weighs about 5 ounces, according to my little household scale. One drawback is that the FAR certified tape, which they recommend for this stuff, is pretty pricey. (It sticks great, though) Tim ****** Tim Lewis timrv6a(at)iname.com N47TD RV-6A, painting Springfield VA http://home.earthlink.net/~timrv6a http://home.earthlink.net/~timrv6a/jpi.html - No JPI stuff in my airplane ________________________________________________________________________________
From: TRAASHMAN(at)webtv.net (Joe Waltz)
Date: Oct 05, 1999
Subject: Re: How much does the firewall insulation weigh?
Scott & others, Which side of the firewall is the better place? I've seen both. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Persyk" <dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: 6A Tank Brackets F696
Date: Oct 05, 1999
Today we (my wife and two other RV-ers) mounted the wings. They fit!. Incidence within 1/10 degree and leading edges collinear to within 1/16 inch (as measured with 4 plumb bobs and a horizontal string). Good edge distance on rear spar AN5 bolt and nice fit with N-drill followed by 0.3100 ream. 17 people hours. The F696 tank mounting brackets (heavy triangles out of 1/4 angle) don't lay flat against the fuselage skin. The included angle is about 98 degrees. How have others fixed this. Is there a way to bend the angle stock outward 8 degrees? Dennis Persyk 6A finishing kit Hampshire, IL C38 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randall Henderson" <randallh(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: 6A Tank Brackets F696
Date: Oct 05, 1999
>The F696 tank mounting brackets (heavy triangles out of 1/4 angle) don't lay >flat against the fuselage skin. The included angle is about 98 degrees. >How have others fixed this. Is there a way to bend the angle stock outward >8 degrees? Yes, you have to bend it. I used a vice, a 2x4, and a big hammer. Don't try to bend it at the angle itself (!) just try to bend the outward facing leg close to the angle. Randall Henderson, RV-6 N6R (flying) http://www.edt.com/homewing randall(at)edt.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randall Henderson" <randallh(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: RV6A Seat Bottoms
Date: Oct 05, 1999
>F639 and F640 forward seat bottom pieces are .040 thick. Plans call for #8 >screws. Can I use my #19 dimple die or must I machine countersink these >thick skins? Dimple. Randall Henderson, RV-6 N6R (flying) Portland, OR http://www.edt.com/homewing ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rick Caldwell" <racaldwell(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Rear Canopy Rivits
Date: Oct 06, 1999
Peter, In my A&P training, we learned all holes in plexi need to be oversize to allow for the large coefficient of thermal expansion the plastic has. The rivets or screws should be centered in the holes, too; but this is difficult to get accomplished. I used a 5/32" plastic drill for the 1/8" rivits. The consequenses of not drilling your holes oversize is unknown for certain but why take the chance of having your canopy creak after you get it flying. I'm sure you will not want to take the plane out of service for lengthy repair once you got it finished. Rick Caldwell RV-6 #24187 just finishing slider & preparing wing installation >From: bramsec <bramsec(at)idirect.com> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: "rv-list(at)matronics.com" >Subject: RV-List: Rear Canopy Rivits >Date: Tue, 05 Oct 1999 19:19:10 -0400 > > >RV6 tilt canopy rear section. The manual says to open holes to #19 size >then pop rivit. I did not open them up ( Left them at 1/8"). Should I >drill out the rivits and open the holes up. > >I was told the only holes that needed opening where those where screws >are used.( to protect the plexiglass from the sharp edges of the screw >threads.) > >I have noticed everytime I stand on the wing there is creeking sounds >from the rear canopy area, I guess the fuselage is slightly twisting and >transmitting this to the plexiglass. > >Just passed final inspection should fly next week. > >Regards Peter (RV6 Toronto) > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: OrndorffG(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 06, 1999
Subject: Re: How much does the firewall insulation weigh?
The firewall insulation we sell meets FAR 25.853b which specified flame retardant qualities. It also will not absorb water or oil. Just as an aside, read this FAR if you can find it on the web. Flame retardant does not mean something will not burn. George and Becki Orndorff ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 06, 1999
From: Bill Von Dane <bvondane(at)atmel.com>
Subject: Plastic Stuff...
Hi all... I am almost ready to skin my vertical stab... How do I get the plastic to come of in those nice thin strips where the rivets go? I put some new pix of my VS up on the web this morn... Later! -Bill Von Dane bvondane(at)atmel.com -8A empennage http://members.tripod.com/rv8tor ________________________________________________________________________________
From: pcondon(at)csc.com
Date: Oct 06, 1999
Subject: Re: 6A Tank Brackets F696
A vice & a long 3 or 4 foot stout bar was used to put some "english" on the angle to bend it. Like the previous poster stated apply pressure at the end of the angle to bend it. Remember to bend a little past the needed angle due to the relaxing of the material after pressure is withdrawn. Its easier than you think. randallh(at)home.com on 10/06/99 01:22:33 AM Please respond to rv-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Re: RV-List: 6A Tank Brackets F696 >The F696 tank mounting brackets (heavy triangles out of 1/4 angle) don't lay >flat against the fuselage skin. The included angle is about 98 degrees. >How have others fixed this. Is there a way to bend the angle stock outward >8 degrees? Yes, you have to bend it. I used a vice, a 2x4, and a big hammer. Don't try to bend it at the angle itself (!) just try to bend the outward facing leg close to the angle. Randall Henderson, RV-6 N6R (flying) http://www.edt.com/homewing randall(at)edt.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: aquila33(at)webtv.net (dann mann)
Date: Oct 06, 1999
Subject: Re: Plastic Stuff...
There is a device called AccuCutter that is basically a precision steel bluck that hold a single edge razor blade so that only the very tip is exposed. It is adjustable and can be set so that it will only cut the plastic and not touch the metal. A very handy tool. Available from any good sign supply outfit for about 20bucks. Try Http://www.tubelite.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rick Jory" <rickjory(at)email.msn.com>
Subject: Re: Plastic Stuff...
Date: Oct 06, 1999
Bill . . . cover the rivet area with regular masking tape. Run a rounded tip soldering iron down both sides of the masking tape, "melting" the plastic. Pull this section off and you are done. You end up with a nice straight line on both sides of the pre-punched holes . . . of course all of the plastic comes off sooner or later. Also, DON'T FORGET TO REMOVE PLASTIC ON THE UNDERSIDE OF THE SKINS. Rick Jory Highlands Ranch, CO -----Original Message----- From: Bill Von Dane <bvondane(at)atmel.com> Date: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 7:43 AM Subject: RV-List: Plastic Stuff... > >Hi all... > >I am almost ready to skin my vertical stab... How do I get the plastic to >come of in those nice thin strips where the rivets go? > >I put some new pix of my VS up on the web this morn... > >Later! > >-Bill Von Dane >bvondane(at)atmel.com >-8A empennage >http://members.tripod.com/rv8tor > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 06, 1999
From: Richard Reynolds <RVReynolds(at)macs.net>
Subject: Re: 6A Tank Brackets F696
Dennis Persyk wrote: > Is there a way to bend the angle stock outward 8 degrees? I bent them before cutting them to shape. Set them on the concrete floor, V side up. Hit them with several good blows with a 4 lb hammer. Distribute the blows along the V. Recheck the angle. When they are "perfect, remove the "bow" in the legs with your 6 in table belt sander to make the legs flat. What, you don't have a table belt sander! Richard Reynolds, Norfolk, VA, RV-6A, getting the instrument panel cut. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 06, 1999
From: Chris Browne <cebrowne(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: -6A Brakes lines
I would like to finish routing my brakes without the wings on, but I'm not sure where the 90 degree AN fitting should go (the drawing is ambiguous). The Justice notes say, in part: "The elbows should be placed far enough forward of the F-602 bulkheads so they do not interfere with the later placement of the F-696 tank attach angles ... The elbow is not placed right next to the gear leg because there is a gap between the fuselage skin and the heavy gusset in this area and tightening the elbow in place deflects the skin" I guess I am looking for a place which is sure not to interfere with rigging the wing. I have seen at one installation on the fitting near the gear leg (I think it's Gary Zilik's). Is the location pretty flexible? Also, I decided to replace the soft 3003-0 Versatube tubing for the pressure lines inside the cockpit with 5052-0 coz the former is so easy to damage. How does the 3003 stuff hold up on the landing gear and at the caliper? Chris Browne -6A finish Atlanta ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 06, 1999
From: Mike Thompson <grobdriver(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Used Squeezer...
--- Richard White wrote: Dick, Did you get my mail regarding this squeezer? - Mike ==== Michael E. Thompson (Grobdriver(at)yahoo.com) Austin, TX, USA RV-6 in progress, N140RV (Reserved) EX-AX1 Sub Hunter, P-3 (B/B-TACMOD/C) Orion Aircrew, PP-G,ASEL, Motorglider Driver and Unlimited Air Race Nut! Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 06, 1999
From: Rob Hatwell <RV8OR(at)overvne.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Plastic Stuff...
Bill Use a soldering iron with a fat tip. A cheap radio shack one will work fine. > >I am almost ready to skin my vertical stab... How do I get the plastic to >come of in those nice thin strips where the rivets go? > >-Bill Von Dane RV8 80274 Wings & Moving House -- Rob Hatwell ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 06, 1999
From: Gary Zilik <zilik(at)bewellnet.com>
Subject: Re: RV6A Seat Bottoms
> F639 and F640 forward seat bottom pieces are .040 thick. Plans call for #8 > screws. Can I use my #19 dimple die or must I machine countersink these > thick skins? There is no problem dimpling the .040 aluminum. If in doubt, test the dimpling process on a piece of scrap. Now for the #8 screws. If you look closely at the plans you will see that the callout is for AN515-8R8 screws and K1000-8 nutplates. These are not countersunk screws. This area gets covered with seat cushions and will not be seen so the extra work installing AN509 screws will not be appreciated by others Gary Zilik RV-6A - Pine Junction, CO ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Norman Hunger" <nhunger(at)sprint.ca>
Subject: Re: Plastic Stuff...
Date: Oct 06, 1999
You will have to lose the plastic when you prime all of the pieces BEFORE riveting. You can leave it on when you drill the skeleton if you are worried about scratches. If you were planning on priming after assembly you would miss every area where two pieces meet each other. Those are the areas that need priming the most. You have to ask yourself if you are trying to build the best aircraft possible. Then again you could live in a very dry climate where priming isn't that important. Just my opinion, I am NOT an expert. Norman > I am almost ready to skin my vertical stab... How do I get the plastic to > come of in those nice thin strips where the rivets go? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <rv8er(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Plastic Stuff...
Date: Oct 06, 1999
Just take it all off...It really doesn't matter..you should sand the skin to prep when you paint anyway, so most scratches are a non-issue. I am about to paint my wings, and have taken 320 grit sand paper on a dual action sander to prep it, and if there was a scratch or two, they are non existent now. Paul Besing RV-6A (197AB) Arizona http://members.home.net/rv8er Finish Kit -----Original Message----- From: Bill Von Dane <bvondane(at)atmel.com> Date: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 1:33 PM Subject: RV-List: Plastic Stuff... > >Hi all... > >I am almost ready to skin my vertical stab... How do I get the plastic to >come of in those nice thin strips where the rivets go? > >I put some new pix of my VS up on the web this morn... > >Later! > >-Bill Von Dane >bvondane(at)atmel.com >-8A empennage >http://members.tripod.com/rv8tor > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 06, 1999
From: Mike Thompson <grobdriver(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: RV6A Seat Bottoms
> This area gets covered with seat > cushions and will not be seen so the extra work installing AN509 > screws will not be appreciated by others > > Gary Zilik May be something to think about, though, if you'll be using seat-pack parachutes on a regular basis... Mike Thmopson Austin, TX -6 N140RV (Reserved) Wings Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 06, 1999
From: Chris Browne <cebrowne(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Angling instruments on panel
I would like to angle mount the engine instruments on my panel and was looking for ideas. Anyone have pix on the web that shows how this is done? Chris Browne -6A finish Atlanta ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard White" <chiefs(at)teleport.com>
Subject: Re: Used Squeezer...
Date: Oct 06, 1999
Mike... I just heard from Shirley Harding in Australia, she said she wants it for sure. Since she responded first she is going to take it. Sorry, I got your hopes up... Dick ----- Original Message ----- From: Mike Thompson <grobdriver(at)yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 8:10 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: Used Squeezer... > > --- Richard White wrote: > > > Dick, > > Did you get my mail regarding this squeezer? > > - Mike > > ==== > Michael E. Thompson (Grobdriver(at)yahoo.com) > Austin, TX, USA > RV-6 in progress, N140RV (Reserved) > EX-AX1 Sub Hunter, P-3 (B/B-TACMOD/C) Orion Aircrew, > PP-G,ASEL, Motorglider Driver and Unlimited Air Race Nut! > > > Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: flyhars(at)attglobal.net
Date: Oct 06, 1999
Please be careful with the razor blade tip, my quick built kit has some unsightly cuts by the rivet lines in the wing and fuselage where it looks like a razor blade cut was used. Harvey Sigmon RV-6AQB- wings installed ----- Original Message -----
From: dann mann <aquila33(at)webtv.net>
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 10:00 AM > > There is a device called AccuCutter that is basically a precision steel > bluck that hold a single edge razor blade so that only the very tip is > exposed. It is adjustable and can be set so that it will only cut the > plastic and not touch the metal. A very handy tool. Available from any > good sign supply outfit for about 20bucks. Try > Http://www.tubelite.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: KBoatri144(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 06, 1999
Subject: Re: Angling instruments on panel
<< I would like to angle mount the engine instruments on my panel and was looking for ideas. Anyone have pix on the web that shows how this is done? Chris Browne -6A finish Atlanta >> I spoke to the guys at Chief Avionics about this a while back. Basically, they cut out the area to be angled, then fab an angled section to fit the hole in the panel. Much cutting/fitting/welding/filling/grinding/sanding is involved to make it look perfect. Kyle Boatright ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Persyk" <dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: 6A Flat Bottom Skin Interference
Date: Oct 06, 1999
When I push the flap hinge pin through the hinge eyes on the wing it hits the fuselage side skin about 3/16 up from the bottom. The bottom flap skins therefore hang up on the bottom fuselage skin. My RV4 builder friends tell me that this is a common problem and the solution is to joggle the bottom flap skin. That seems pretty hard to do at this stage of the game! How have other 6A and 6 builders handled this problem? Dennis Persyk 6A finishing kit Hampshire, IL 38 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 06, 1999
From: chester razer <razer(at)midwest.net>
Subject: Ham and Beans Fly-In
I would like to invite all the RV and Experimental flyers, builders and wannabees to my 2nd annual pig roast which this year is going to be a ham and beans feed. Time is 11:00 am on sunday October 17th. Location is Sparta, IL (SAR). Bring a chair. Nothing is required but if you'd like to bring a dessert or a pan of corn bread thats allright. this is the only message youll receive and in 60 seconds this message will self destruct. Also for anyone who wants to come over saturday night, the beer light will be burning and there's plenty of camping room. There is a great place to eat and party across the street from the airport and a real nice motel there also. chet and miss chiquita 210 hrs now since Jan 98. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JDaniel343(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 06, 1999
Subject: Re: Who's RV4 at the MN Picnic?
If you think about that trim tab carefully I believe you will understand that it won't work. The trim tab if I am not mistaken needs to be attached to the surface your trying to trim. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 06, 1999
From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: 6A Flat Bottom Skin Interference
Dennis, I cut the bottom flap skins even with the top skins and riveted a joggled "extension" onto the bottom flap skins that covers the gap and the hole for the flap pushrod. The joggle is easy to do on the workbench and you can easily toss a couple of them if necessary to get the right joggle without booggering up the flap. You can see a photo of the extensions here (scroll about 2/3 down the page): http://home.HiWAAY.net/~sbuc/journal/finish6.html Sam Buchanan "The RV Journal" http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal ----------------- Dennis Persyk wrote: > > > When I push the flap hinge pin through the hinge eyes on the wing it hits > the fuselage side skin about 3/16 up from the bottom. The bottom flap skins > therefore hang up on the bottom fuselage skin. My RV4 builder friends tell > me that this is a common problem and the solution is to joggle the bottom > flap skin. That seems pretty hard to do at this stage of the game! > How have other 6A and 6 builders handled this problem? > > Dennis Persyk 6A finishing kit > Hampshire, IL 38 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 06, 1999
From: Gary Zilik <zilik(at)bewellnet.com>
Subject: Re: Plastic Stuff... and sanding?
> Just take it all off...It really doesn't matter..you should sand the skin to > prep when you paint anyway, so most scratches are a non-issue. I am about > to paint my wings, and have taken 320 grit sand paper on a dual action > sander to prep it, and if there was a scratch or two, they are non existent > now. Also non existent after sanding with 320 grit sand paper is the alclad coating we so dearly pay for and most primers builders are using today are not very good at corrosion protection unless sealed with a top coat. Scotch brite pads do a wonderful job for prepping skins for paint. FWIW I left the plastic on the skins for drilling dimpling and removed it just before prepping for interior priming. Green scotchbright and a little soap and water gets it ready for priming real fast. Gary Zilik RV-6A Pine Junction, CO ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 06, 1999
From: Gert <gert(at)execpc.com>
Subject: Inverted tank wiring & flap brace assembly RV-8
A while ago Scott McDaniels suggested to run the wire(s) for the inverted tank through the z brackets which hold the tank in place. The smallest snap-in bushings I can find are 3/8 od. Is it acceptable to drill this hole in the first two z brackets ?? Also, on the RV-8 flap, I seem to be unable to get the requested 3/16" dimension for the 406-A, B and C assembly. This is, I think, measured from the (horizontal) rib flange to the outside vertical leg of FL-406C. I can go just over 1/8" before I would get into edge-hole distance problems. (drawing 14, RV-8, bottom right, section A-A') I believe I have the 88 degree angle of the 406-A pretty accurate, this would come out to be about 1/8" anyway. How critical is the 3/16" ?? Gert -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pursuant to US Code, Title 47, Chapter 5, Subchapter II, '227, any and all nonsolicited commercial E-mail sent to this address is subject to a download and archival fee in the amount of $500 US. E-mailing denotes acceptance of these terms. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "The Fogersons" <rfogerso(at)ida.net>
Subject: RV-6A for sale
Date: Oct 06, 1999
I have decided, with rather mixed feelings, to put my trusty N27FR up for sale for the $ I have invested. Looking in at the rv-list the past year, the urge to build another RV has overtaken me. You guys are just having too much fun. I did retire a few months ago and frankly, I need something to do. Enjoying building as much as flying the RV's, whether it sells or not it's a win-win situation. What a deal! The only draw back is retirement does not permit me to build and keep the RV. Anyone interested can contact Rick Fogerson off the list at rfogerso(at)ida.net or 208-237-4143 for specifics. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 06, 1999
Subject: Re: Angling instruments on panel
In a message dated 10/6/99 5:08:13 PM Pacific Daylight Time, KBoatri144(at)aol.com writes: << I spoke to the guys at Chief Avionics about this a while back. Basically, they cut out the area to be angled, then fab an angled section to fit the hole in the panel. Much cutting/fitting/welding/filling/grinding/sanding is involved to make it look perfect. >> Laird Owens had a great prototype of a compost slanted panel at the Golden West Fly-in. I think he was trying to determine if he could make a go at commercializing it and he can be reached at . -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 06, 1999
Subject: Windscreen screws
From: michael d hilger <rvsixer(at)juno.com>
I am about to attach the windscreen to the rollbar of my RV-6. I want to use some sort of threadlocker on the screws but I know Loctite will attack the plex. I remember reading about a retaining compound that is applied and allowed to set. The parts can then be assembled whenever convenient. Sort of like a nylon insert. I have looked in the Archives but no luck. Anyone have any ideas? Mike Hilger RV-6 N207AM Finishing kit ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Weiler" <dougweil(at)pressenter.com>
Subject: Re: Windscreen screws
Date: Oct 06, 1999
Mike I believe the stuff you are referring to is Vibra-Tite made by ND Industries. See p 99 of 18 years of the RV Ator. I haven't yet found a source for this material, although I believe ND Industries has a web site. Doug Weiler ----- Original Message ----- From: michael d hilger <rvsixer(at)juno.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 9:42 PM Subject: RV-List: Windscreen screws > > > I am about to attach the windscreen to the rollbar of my RV-6. I want to > use some sort of threadlocker on the screws but I know Loctite will > attack the plex. I remember reading about a retaining compound that is > applied and allowed to set. The parts can then be assembled whenever > convenient. Sort of like a nylon insert. I have looked in the Archives > but no luck. Anyone have any ideas? > > Mike Hilger > RV-6 N207AM > Finishing kit ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Inverted tank wiring & flap brace assembly RV-8
From: Scott R McDaniels <smcdaniels(at)juno.com>
Date: Oct 06, 1999
>A while ago Scott McDaniels suggested to run the wire(s) for the >inverted tank through the z brackets which hold the tank in place. > >The smallest snap-in bushings I can find are 3/8 od. Is it acceptable >to >drill this hole in the first two z brackets ?? > I have used some that fit in a 3/16 hole (hole in the plastic grommet is about 1/8 ") Sorry, I don't know where to get them though. Scott McDaniels Former RV-6A owner North Plains OR. smcdaniels(at)juno.com These opinions and ideas are mine alone, and they may not reflect the opinions and ideas of my employer. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 06, 1999
From: Peter Laurence <plaurenc(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: RMI
Is anyone thinking of using or is using the RMI Micro encoder and Micro monitor? If so, any info and/or opinions is appreciated. Peter -- Peter Laurence RV6-A Wings plaurenc(at)bellsouth.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 06, 1999
From: "Gary A. Sobek" <rv6flier(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: RMI
--- Peter Laurence wrote: > > > Is anyone thinking of using or is using the RMI > Micro encoder and Micro > monitor? If so, any info and/or opinions is > appreciated. > > > Peter > -- > Peter Laurence > RV6-A Wings > plaurenc(at)bellsouth.net After two years and 430 flying hours, I LOVE both my Micro Monitor and Micro Encoder. I have the Micro Encoder set up to read TRUE airspeed all the time. In no (calm) wind, it reads the same as my Apollo GPS ground speed. The altitue alert feature of the Micro Encoder is also a nice feature along with the Vne and stall alarms. Of course the Micro Monitor has alarms for all the major engine functions including low fuel. ==== Gary A. Sobek "My Sanity" RV-6 N157GS O-320 Hartzell, So. CA, USA Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <rv8er(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: RMI
Date: Oct 06, 1999
You may want to check the archives on this..there are many satisfied customers of RMI. I have both built both of them, and have some additional information on my website: http://members.home.net/rv8er/avionics.htm Paul Besing RV-6A (197AB) Arizona http://members.home.net/rv8er Finish Kit -----Original Message----- From: Peter Laurence <plaurenc(at)bellsouth.net> Date: Thursday, October 07, 1999 3:56 AM Subject: RV-List: RMI > >Is anyone thinking of using or is using the RMI Micro encoder and Micro >monitor? If so, any info and/or opinions is appreciated. > > >Peter >-- >Peter Laurence >RV6-A Wings >plaurenc(at)bellsouth.net > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kerrjb(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 07, 1999
Subject: Re: How much does the firewall insulation weigh? Oct
1999 21:0... In a message dated 10/6/99 7:10:36 PM Eastern Daylight Time, TRAASHMAN(at)webtv.net writes: << Scott & others, Which side of the firewall is the better place? I've seen both. >> You would not wish to put Rockets material on the engine side because it would soak oil IMHO Bernie Kerr, 6A finishing, SE Fla ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kerrjb(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 07, 1999
Subject: Re: 6A Tank Brackets F696
In a message dated 10/6/99 7:32:08 PM Eastern Daylight Time, dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net writes: << Is there a way to bend the angle stock outward 8 degrees? >> Yep, the written words say that you have to bend it. It is very difficult to bend after you cut the angle, so it filed away part of the back side against the fuselage to get it flat. Bernie Kerr, 6A finishing, SE Fla ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kerrjb(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 07, 1999
Subject: Re: 6A Flat Bottom Skin Interference
In a message dated 10/6/99 7:51:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time, dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net writes: << How have other 6A and 6 builders handled this problem? >> One possible solution is to drop the trailing edge down the 3/16 inch to make it flush with the fuselage skin. This will change the incidence angle on the wing. You will have to account for this on the horizontal stab incidence so that they keep the same relative angle to each other or you will change the pitch stability. When you are ready to set the stab incidence, pitch the airplane until you get the 3.03 inch difference between the top of the wing at the butt joint over the main spar and the top of the wing over the rear spar as shown on the plans. Now your top longeron will not be level, ignore this and set the horizontal stab at zero angle to horizontal. This means that your fuselage will fly at slightly less angle of attack than a nominal RV, but I was told by Van's technical staff that it might be faster or slower because it has never been optimised for best angle. I would check with Van's to make sure they have not changed their position, but this is the way my plane is but it not flying yet. Bernie Kerr, 6A finishing, SE Fla ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 1999
From: "Scott A. Jordan" <SAJ_SLJ(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: Inverted tank wiring & flap brace assembly RV-8
Message text written by Gert: >A while ago Scott McDaniels suggested to run the wire(s) for the inverted tank through the z brackets which hold the tank in place. The smallest snap-in bushings I can find are 3/8 od. < I bought a small bag of various size rubber grommets from Radio Shack for about a buck. The smallest used a hole of about 1/4" and held the wire snuggly. I also secured the wire with a tie wrap so that I could not easily tug it off the sender. Scott A. Jordan 80331 rudder pedals ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Graham Jones" <gratech(at)a1.com.au>
Subject: Re: WAYNE HADLEY
Date: Oct 07, 1999
From Avweb 10/04/99 WAYNE HANDLEY INJURED IN AIR SHOW CRASH Air show star Wayne Handley was injured late Sunday when his Turbo Raven crashed at the Salinas (Calif.) Municipal Airport. A spokesman at a local hospital said that he was in serious condition with a spinal injury. Witnesses said that Handley's plane crashed early in his routine. What can I say.... Graham Jones Australia ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Airbatix(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 07, 1999
Subject: Re: Angling instruments on panel
original message ...."I would like to angle mount the engine instruments on my panel and was looking for ideas. Anyone have pix on the web that shows how this is done?" I completely redesigned my instrument panel so the avionics are all center stacked and slightly canted toward me, the engine instruments are to the right of the stack and canted at a slightly greater angle, and a map box is at the far right. The panel is made from fibreglass (using moldless techniques) and has aluminum inserts throughout for strength. I will tell you that this took a BUNCH of design time and extended my construction by two months. Not only did the panel need design, but all the supporting structure for avionics, etc. needed modification and design. I like the results (its "cool" and more functional) and learned more about fibreglass but it is a lot of work for modest ergonomic gains. If someone is selling a contoured panel....buy it. good luck on ur decision ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rick Caldwell" <racaldwell(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Windscreen screws
Date: Oct 07, 1999
> I am about to attach the windscreen to the rollbar of my RV-6. I >want to >use some sort of threadlocker on the screws but I know Loctite will >attack the plex. I remember reading about a retaining compound that is >applied and allowed to set. The parts can then be assembled whenever >convenient. Sort of like a nylon insert. I have looked in the Mike, I do not see the need to lock the screws, especially if a fiberglass fairing will be laid up over the screws. A mixture of epoxy resin and cotton flock is mixed and smeared over the screw heads to seal the discontinuities. The fiberglass ( or carbon fiber like I used) is laid up over this. The screws can not turn because of the resin and are therefore locked in place. BTW, I did not tighten these screws. I snugged them up and then backed them out 1/2 turn. I did this to relieve stress around the screw head and allow the plexi the freedom to grow as the temp. changes. As mentioned, the screws are held in this position by the resin. An aluminum fairing would also keep the screws from backing out. I don't see why epoxy/flock can not be used under the aluminum fairng either. Rick Caldwell RV-6 #24187 just finished the windscreen fairing. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Frazier, Vincent A" <VFrazier(at)usi.edu>
Subject: RE: RV-List Digest: 10/06/99 creaking canopy
Date: Oct 07, 1999
My first canopy creaked like an old rocking chair. I could even hear it when taxiing. The next canopy I built had a thin bead of silicone caulk applied between the frame and the plexi. It never makes a sound and seems much sturdier. Worked great for me and I plan to do the same on my current project. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 1999
From: Bill Thomas <wd_thomas(at)ctconnect.com>
Subject: Exhaust System
I bought a used 0-360 which was in a Decathalon Scout, and can't use the exhaust system (pipes and muffler) on my -6A. If anyone wants it, I'll give it away free if you will just pay the shipping. Might be usable for parts, or maybe could be modified somehow. Anyway, it's a freebie. Email me off line at wd_thomas(at)ctconnect.com. Bill Thomas -6A Finish Kit. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ken Harrill <KHarrill(at)osa.state.sc.us>
Subject: Windscreen screws/carbon fiber
Date: Oct 07, 1999
I do not see the need to lock the screws, especially if a fiberglass fairing will be laid up over the screws. A mixture of epoxy resin and cotton flock is mixed and smeared over the screw heads to seal the discontinuities. The fiberglass ( or carbon fiber like I used) is laid up over this. The screws can not turn because of the resin and are therefore locked in place. Rick, I am considering carbon fiber for this lay up. Can you give us some details: where did buy it, what weight, difficulties encountered, would you do it again, etc. Thanks. Ken Harrill RV-6, finish kit Columbia, SC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 1999
From: Chris Browne <cebrowne(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: 99% -6A for sale
A builder in the Atlanta area (Ellenwood) has decided to sell his -6a slider project. The plane is complete except for fittng the spinner and wheel pants. Brand new O-320 with Sensenich prop. Call for more details. Owner is Gary E Polizzotto, 404-523-1000 Chris Browne Atlanta ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 07, 1999
Subject: Re: Windscreen screws
In a message dated 10/6/99 8:29:12 PM Pacific Daylight Time, rvsixer(at)juno.com writes: << I am about to attach the windscreen to the rollbar of my RV-6. I want to use some sort of threadlocker on the screws but I know Loctite will attack the plex. >> 3M 2216 epoxy might be good for this. It is tough and takes a flexible set. Find someone building a Kitfox in your area and bum some. It's a gray structural epoxy they use for bonding the wood ribs to the aluminum spars. -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rick Caldwell" <racaldwell(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Windscreen screws/carbon fiber
Date: Oct 07, 1999
> I am considering carbon fiber for this lay up. Can you >give us some details: where did buy it, what weight, difficulties >encountered, would you do it again, etc. Ken, The only drawback I normally encounter with carbon fiber is that I can not see through the laminate. In the windscreen case, this was not an issue. I used fiberglass for the rear canopy skirt because I needed to see the holes that were already drilled in the steel tube underneath. I used 5.7 oz. bidirectional plain weave carbon fiber because that is what I had on hand. A satin weave conforms better to compound curves, but in the windscreen case, the plain works fine because of little compound curve. I used 4 plies of carbon and topped with one ply of 5.7 oz BID fiberglass. I did this because the outer layer usually gets part way sanded off when in the later filling/sanding phase. This made a laminate about 0.095 in. thick. The plies were staggered away from the front edge to help get the tapered front edge look. My carbon was given to me by Charlie Grey, the composite plane expert. It was scrap from one of his previous projects. Not much is needed for the windscreen. The strips I cut were 2 in. wide by about 50 in. length. Since this did not span the full bow, I butt joined smaller strips on the sides and staggered the joints. ACS and others sell carbon. Try to buy some scraps from a composite builder if available. I used fiberglass for the front windscreen fairing because I did not have enough carbon. I used carbon not to save weight, but to increase the stiffnes of the top bow fairing. No problems encountered and would recommend others to do the same. Only problem I had was filling with WEST Microlight/epoxy. The vertical/near vertical surfaces made runs that increased the number of filling/sanding iterations. It took me a day longer to finish than anticipated. Sunday layup thru next Sunday final 120 grit sanding. Rick Caldwell RV-6 #24187 Fuel tank fuse. attach fitting bending today ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wallace R. Penney" <wallyp(at)interlog.com>
Subject: Tailwheel Technique
Date: Oct 07, 1999
I think the Sport Aviation article you are referring to was 'Taming the Taildragger'. It was more than five years ago, it was in the April/92 issue. Wally........flying RV-3, Toronto ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Van Artsdalen, Scott" <svanarts(at)unionsafe.com>
Subject: Tailwheel Technique
Date: Oct 07, 1999
There was also a great book by the same name. It could have been a handbook for my old Aeronca Champ. It had a lot of common sense in it for flying tailwheel aircraft. It was a quick read too. -- Scott VanArtsdalen, MCSE Network Administrator Union Safe Deposit Bank 209-946-5116 svanarts(at)unionsafe.com -----Original Message----- From: Wallace R. Penney [mailto:wallyp(at)interlog.com] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 1999 7:33 AM Subject: RV-List: Tailwheel Technique I think the Sport Aviation article you are referring to was 'Taming the Taildragger'. It was more than five years ago, it was in the April/92 issue. Wally........flying RV-3, Toronto ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Claude Heiniger" <cheiniger(at)dplanet.ch>
Subject: Re: Plastic Stuff...
Date: Oct 07, 1999
Dear Paul. Going back to my A&P years and training, we were taught never to use sand paper on aluminum as it tends to hurt the alclad or pure aluminum on the 5% thickness on each side of the skin and apparently could leave some stuff inbedded. If you need to do some scuffing, scotchbrite is the way to go, as you actually etch the skins befor the alodine. Claude Heiniger, A&P, ATP/ CFI Geneva Switherland, Candidate for building an RV6 ----- Original Message ----- From: Paul Besing <rv8er(at)home.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 12:26 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Plastic Stuff... > > Just take it all off...It really doesn't matter..you should sand the skin to > prep when you paint anyway, so most scratches are a non-issue. I am about > to paint my wings, and have taken 320 grit sand paper on a dual action > sander to prep it, and if there was a scratch or two, they are non existent > now. > > Paul Besing > RV-6A (197AB) Arizona > http://members.home.net/rv8er > Finish Kit > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Von Dane <bvondane(at)atmel.com> > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 1:33 PM > Subject: RV-List: Plastic Stuff... > > > > > >Hi all... > > > >I am almost ready to skin my vertical stab... How do I get the plastic to > >come of in those nice thin strips where the rivets go? > > > >I put some new pix of my VS up on the web this morn... > > > >Later! > > > >-Bill Von Dane > >bvondane(at)atmel.com > >-8A empennage > >http://members.tripod.com/rv8tor > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BumFlyer(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 07, 1999
Subject: Re: RV6A Seat Bottoms
In a message dated 10/6/99 23:32:52, randallh(at)home.com writes: << >F639 and F640 forward seat bottom pieces are .040 thick. Plans call for #8 >screws. Can I use my #19 dimple die or must I machine countersink these >thick skins? >> It has been a long time so I can't vouch for the plans; however mine has the round head screws, which have all been replaced with stronger ones. I would recommend using the round ones and not countersink. They are easier to get out when you chew out the screw slots with your electric driver. Don't know why but my experience of goobering up these screws is far greater than any where else. D Walsh ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 1999
From: Gary Zilik <zilik(at)bewellnet.com>
Subject: UHMW Tape
Does anyone know the thickness of the UHMW tape that Van's carries? I think they carry both 3/4" and 3" wide tapes Gary Zilik ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 1999
From: Gary Zilik <zilik(at)bewellnet.com>
Subject: Poly Fiber Smooth Prime - Pinhole fillers
Does anyone have experience with Poly Fiber's Smooth Prime for filling the pin holes in the S-type cowl. Is it compatible with paints/primers other than PF's Flight Gloss. Are there any problems using polyester fillers such as Feather Fill on the epoxy cowl? Are there any good suggestions (read; easy ways) on finishing the epoxy cowl? Gary Zilik ________________________________________________________________________________
From: mikel(at)dimensional.com
Date: Oct 07, 1999
Subject: RMI
>Is anyone thinking of using or is using the RMI Micro encoder and Micro >monitor? Check the archives. I have an encoder; wouldn't (can't) fly without it. Michael ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 1999
From: Sandra Baggett <accuracy(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: constant/speed prop
Does any one have a constant speed prop for sale. If so please contact me off list at accuracy(at)earthlink.net or call 615-643-1030. Thanks Bob Baggett ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 1999
From: Chris Browne <cebrowne(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: N58RV Factual Narrative
It's posted on the NTSB website at http://www.ntsb.gov/Aviation/LAX/lnarr_98A171.htm There is some new info, especially regarding the elevator trim tab. Also seems "The fitting connecting the right tank fuel line to the fuel selector was less than finger tight and was separated from the selector with less than three full turns." Maybe the reason for the surge? Chris Browne Atlanta ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Fesenbek, Gary" <fesenbek(at)marykay.com>
Subject: Magneto Timing
Date: Oct 07, 1999
I'm FINALLY in a position to start up my bird and am looking for advise on purchasing the equipment necessary to set the magneto timing. I plan on doing my own annuals and have seen some of the stuff offered from Aircraft Spruce such as Magneto Timing Light, Aircraft Timing Indicator and Inductor Magneto Sychronizer. Also there is a Slick Magneto Assembly and Timing Kit offered (quite pricey at $260). I am planning to get an A&P to help me on the first crack but am looking for some help on what tools/equipment I need to get also. Gary Fesenbek RV6A Dallas, TX ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 1999
From: Amos Bechtel <abechtel(at)agctr.lsu.edu>
Subject: drilling out rivets
List, I have finally created a problem for myself on my -8 that requires some input from experienced rivet-men (persons?). I prematurely drove a rivet into one of the flap brace holes in the reinforcing plates on the root end of the rear wing spar. That in itself is no big deal because I have become very proficient at removing rivets. What I normally do with 1/8 inch rivets, especially long ones, is to use a 1/16 inch drill bit to drill a hole all the way through the rivet before using a larger bit to remove the rivet head and it has worked great up to this point. The hole through the middle of the rivet seems to make it easier to drive out the rivet without damaging any other components. Last night, however, I broke off that 1/16 bit in the rivet and I am now at a loss as to how to proceed. I can't get hold of the bit to remove it. I can't drill it out. I was considering grinding the rivet off flush with the spar and then drilling some new holes to place new rivets in. The problem with this last option is that the steel drill bit will still be in there surrounded by aluminum and I am afraid this would be the start of a corrosion problem. I would appreciate any suggestions you might have. And things were going so well, Amos ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DenClay(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 07, 1999
Subject: Re: drilling out rivets
Amos, One possibility, use a nice, sharp wood chisel (the one you yell at the wife and kids for using on anything but wood), and chisel off the manufactured head, working around it as you cut. A flush 426 you say? oh...maybe a pair of close nippers on the shop head to remove it, then pull the bit of bit on through. Good luck. Dennis #80473 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rick Caldwell" <racaldwell(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: drilling out rivets
Date: Oct 07, 1999
Amos, Perhaps you can access the backside and drill from there. Then you can tap out the broken drill bit when you break thru to the other hole. Rick Caldwell RV-6 #24187 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "steffco1" <steffco1(at)email.msn.com>
Subject: RV8 Control Column Fix
Date: Oct 07, 1999
Lister's I am fitting my Control Column & have encountered the binding that we all have. I have obtained the taper rod fix & it helped a bit. I still have binding. I talked with Scott at Van's today & there is a new Control Column that is available that solves the problem. The dimensions have been changed to ensure a bind-free fit. One is on the way to me free of charge. FYI.....Mark Mark Steffensen RV8A Wiring & Stuff ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 08, 1999
From: Frank van der Hulst <frankv(at)ee.cit.ac.nz>
Subject: Re: drilling out rivets
Amos Bechtel wrote: > Last night, > however, I broke off that 1/16 bit in the rivet and I am now at a loss > as to how to proceed. I can't get hold of the bit to remove it. I > can't drill it out. I was considering grinding the rivet off flush with > the spar and then drilling some new holes to place new rivets in. The > problem with this last option is that the steel drill bit will still be > in there surrounded by aluminum and I am afraid this would be the start > of a corrosion problem. I'd be more worried about it eventually coming out and jamming something up. If you can't get it out, I suggest you glue it in with epoxy. First thing I'd try and do (if the parts aren't in the jig) would be to try shake the bit loose. Maybe use compressed air to try and blow it out. Or a vacuum cleaner to suck it out. How about a strong magnet? If that fails, can you get to the other side of the piece and drill off the shop head? Basically, use the same technique as for drilling off the factory head. It's a bit more difficult to be sure you're exactly centred though. Or perhaps try grinding/filing down the factory head far enough to allow you to get a grip on that pesky bit. Incidentally, I use a 3/32" bit for the initial hole. I drill it just to the depth of the factory head. Usually I can break off the factory head with an old 3/32" bit, but sometimes I have to go up to a 1/8" to get the factory head off. Then I drill through the rivet with the 3/32" bit, and pull the shop head and rivet remains off with a pair of pliers. Frank. -- frankv(at)ee.cit.ac.nz Frank van der Hulst My home page is http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~frankvdh ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 1999
From: Larry Olson <lolson(at)doitnow.com>
Subject: Lycoming 0320-A1A For Sale
OK, let's try again. Friend will take offer... ------------------------------------------ Posting for a friend: For Sale Lycoming 0320-A1A Complete 0 SMOH New Slick Mags & Harnesses New Carb New Prop Governor New Vacuum Pump or Hyd Pump Alternator Starter Fuel Pump All logs since new Rebuild by local reputable shop $ 12,500 FOB Phoenix, AZ Plug N Play... You can reply to me and I'll forward. Larry Olson Cave Creek, AZ RV6 - Fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: KBoatri144(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 07, 1999
Subject: Paint Quantities (again)
Listers, I'm a couple of weeks away from painting all of the flying surfaces on my RV-6. No, the systems, firewall forward, etc., aren't all installed, but if I get everything but the fuse painted before the weather turns cold, I'm sure a warm weekend will magically appear this winter (here in the warm Atlanta, GA climate) to let me paint the fuse when that time arrives... Anyway, the question is: How much paint do I need to buy to paint the entire airframe? I'm only interested in the base color (white). I'll be using either Imron or Centari (with hardener) over variprime. I'm aware of the advantages/disadvantages of all of these systems, so let's not digress into THAT... I've looked in the archives, and there are several paint quantity references. Unfortunately, there is a wide spread, even using the same system. Also, it isn't clear whether the posters were talking in terms of sprayable gallons or non-sprayable gallons (before reducer, hardener, etc). Finally, the type of spray apparatus isn't always given. So... If you've painted your plane (or helped someone else with theirs), send me your experiences. I'll summarize everything and post a synopsis back to the list in a week or two. To make the data worthwhile, include: 1) Paint system used. 2) Gallons of base color used (sprayable gallons, please). 3) Type of spray apparatus used. (HVLP or conventional.) 4) Percent coverage with base color (if you didn't go ahead and spray the whole thing in the base color). 5) Base color. Thanks, Kyle Boatright Working on the slow bits... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 1999
From: "Tom Ervin" <tcervin(at)valkyrie.net>
Subject: Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 20:09:57 -0400
I am looking for a Brake Flaring Tool to use on my RV6-A project. New ones compared to the automotive types are priced very high and we all try to save where we can as long as it not a safety issue. Anyone have a line on a used one ? Thanks Tom Ervin ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 1999
From: Gert <gert(at)execpc.com>
Subject: Re: Inverted tank wiring & flap brace assembly RV-8
Soooo, all y'all saying 3/8 is too big, got the message...or are all y'all saying i am not looking hard enough for a smaller bushing....? Well, what about my second question re. the flap actuator assy.?? Gert Gert wrote: > > > A while ago Scott McDaniels suggested to run the wire(s) for the > inverted tank through the z brackets which hold the tank in place. > > The smallest snap-in bushings I can find are 3/8 od. Is it acceptable to > drill this hole in the first two z brackets ?? > > Also, on the RV-8 flap, I seem to be unable to get the requested 3/16" > dimension for the 406-A, B and C assembly. This is, I think, measured > from the (horizontal) rib flange to the outside vertical leg of FL-406C. > I can go just over 1/8" before I would get into edge-hole distance > problems. (drawing 14, RV-8, bottom right, section A-A') > > I believe I have the 88 degree angle of the 406-A pretty accurate, this > would come out to be about 1/8" anyway. How critical is the 3/16" ?? > > Gert > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Pursuant to US Code, Title 47, Chapter 5, Subchapter II, '227, > any and all nonsolicited commercial E-mail sent to this address > is subject to a download and archival fee in the amount of $500 > US. E-mailing denotes acceptance of these terms. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pursuant to US Code, Title 47, Chapter 5, Subchapter II, '227, any and all nonsolicited commercial E-mail sent to this address is subject to a download and archival fee in the amount of $500 US. E-mailing denotes acceptance of these terms. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 1999
From: Finn Lassen <finnlassen(at)netzero.net>
Subject: RV-3 engine fire - fuselage wanted
I thought I better share today's experience in the hope that others may learn from my mistakes. Following Tracy Crook's advice, I tied down my RV-3 to make a full throttle run-up of my Mazda 13-B rotary engine installation prior to any first flight. I ran the engine for maybe 1 - 2 minutes, shut it down, waited a couple of minutes and did another engine run-up for another couple of minutes. Suddenly, when throttling down, I noticed orange frames coming out my left cowl cheek (left open - no cone). Instead of doing what I should have done (shut off fuel pumps and turned fuel valve off and shut down engine), I first tried to blow out the fire by adding throttle. That produced a much bigger orange flame. By then smoke had started to appear in the cockpit so I shut down the engine and got out, bringing my little foam extinguisher with me. I successfully put out the fire by emptying it into the left cowl cheek opening. Meanwhile, the FBO line guy had arrived with a bigger extinguisher and I had him stand by while removing the cowling. By inspection of the engine installation I found that the oil hose had ruptured where it passes by the exhaust pipe. Apparently the hot exhaust pipe had ignited the oil. That fire then reached higher and melted the (polyurethane) fuel lines near the fire wall. I'm still not sure if they melted close or if they added fuel to the fire. All this seemed simple to fix: Route the oil hose further from the exhaust pipe with a heat shield in between and add fire sleeve. Use rubber fuel lines with fire sleeves. However, upon closer inspection of the plane, I found that the bottom skins of the flaps had melted. All bottom skins all the way out to the tail wheel had deformed, and the rear bottom skin had actually torn. The right elevator bottom (the wind had blown the flame from left to right under the fuselage) was also deformed. The rear bottom wing skins were also deformed for about 10 to 20 inches out on each side. It is very possible that the damage would have been limited if I had drilled engine fire procedure. Seems that now I have no alternative than to: Remove wings and tail section and truck the parts home for a fuselage rebuild (and replacing inner wing bottom skins). It may be easier (and safer) to simply build a new fuselage. If anybody knows of an RV-3 fuselage kit (preferably untouched - not started) for sale at a good price, please do contact me (finnlassen(at)netzero.com). If anybody have any good ideas on how to repair the fuselage without removing the rear top fuselage skin I'd be happy to hear about it. So much for flying this Century. Moral of the story: Do a failure analysis of all parts of engine installation (what if?). Drill engine fire procedure before starting engine - even for the first time. I lucked out - it could have been much worse - could have happened in the air. Thanks to Tracy for saving my bacon! Finn NetZero - Defenders of the Free World ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 08, 1999
From: Scott <acepilot(at)mwt.net>
Subject: Re: RV-3 engine fire - fuselage wanted
Excellent advice Finn!!! Sorry to hear about your misfortune, but at the same time it was fortunate for the reasons you mentioned (better to be down here wishing you were up there than vice versa). I'll keep an ear to the ground for an RV3 fuselage. Scott RV-4 tailkit, Wisconsin Finn Lassen wrote: > > > I thought I better share today's experience in the hope that others may > learn from my mistakes. > > Following Tracy Crook's advice, I tied down my RV-3 to make a full > throttle run-up of my Mazda 13-B rotary engine installation prior to any > first flight. > > I ran the engine for maybe 1 - 2 minutes, shut it down, waited a couple > of minutes and did another engine run-up for another couple of minutes. > Suddenly, when throttling down, I noticed orange frames coming out my > left cowl cheek (left open - no cone). Instead of doing what I should > have done (shut off fuel pumps and turned fuel valve off and shut down > engine), I first tried to blow out the fire by adding throttle. That > produced a much bigger orange flame. By then smoke had started to appear > in the cockpit so I shut down the engine and got out, bringing my little > foam extinguisher with me. I successfully put out the fire by emptying > it into the left cowl cheek opening. > > Meanwhile, the FBO line guy had arrived with a bigger extinguisher and I > had him stand by while removing the cowling. > > By inspection of the engine installation I found that the oil hose had > ruptured where it passes by the exhaust pipe. Apparently the hot exhaust > pipe had ignited the oil. That fire then reached higher and melted the > (polyurethane) fuel lines near the fire wall. I'm still not sure if they > melted close or if they added fuel to the fire. > > All this seemed simple to fix: > Route the oil hose further from the exhaust pipe with a heat shield in > between and add fire sleeve. > Use rubber fuel lines with fire sleeves. > > However, upon closer inspection of the plane, I found that the bottom > skins of the flaps had melted. All bottom skins all the way out to the > tail wheel had deformed, and the rear bottom skin had actually torn. The > right elevator bottom (the wind had blown the flame from left to right > under the fuselage) was also deformed. The rear bottom wing skins were > also deformed for about 10 to 20 inches out on each side. > > It is very possible that the damage would have been limited if I had > drilled engine fire procedure. > > Seems that now I have no alternative than to: > Remove wings and tail section and truck the parts home for a fuselage > rebuild (and replacing inner wing bottom skins). > > It may be easier (and safer) to simply build a new fuselage. If anybody > knows of an RV-3 fuselage kit (preferably untouched - not started) for > sale at a good price, please do contact me (finnlassen(at)netzero.com). > > If anybody have any good ideas on how to repair the fuselage without > removing the rear top fuselage skin I'd be happy to hear about it. > > So much for flying this Century. > > Moral of the story: > Do a failure analysis of all parts of engine installation (what if?). > Drill engine fire procedure before starting engine - even for the first > time. > > I lucked out - it could have been much worse - could have happened in > the air. Thanks to Tracy for saving my bacon! > > Finn > > NetZero - Defenders of the Free World > -- --Scott-- 1986 Corben Junior Ace N3642 RV-4 under construction (tail feathers) Gotta Fly or Gonna Die! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RClayp5888(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 07, 1999
Subject: Exhaust System Question
Listers, I am installing an IO-360 in my 6A. It looks to me that the crossover exhaust system sold by Van's is going to get in the way of the servo. I am also installing the Sam James Cowl which has an air scoop that is already part of the cowl (not separate like Van's). So...I need to line up the servo directly with the scoop. I don't think this is possible using the High Counrty Exhaust System. I may be wrong...but at a look at this and I think I am right. So my question is....Is there any other exhaust systems available that are not crossover type? If so who would I contact to find one of these creatures? Finally, has anyone out there used this particular combination of engine, servo (Bendix) and cowl. Bob Claypool. 428BC (reserved), Fresno, CA ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 1999
From: Cy Galley <cgalley(at)accessus.net>
Subject: Re: Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 20:09:57 -0400
Check with your local EAA Chapter. Many have a tool library. Mine does! > >I am looking for a Brake Flaring Tool to use on my RV6-A project. New ones >compared to the automotive types are priced very high and we all try to >save where we can as long as it not a safety issue. Anyone have a line on a >used one ? Thanks Tom Ervin > > Cy Galley - Editor, B-C Contact! Visit our web site at... http://www.bellanca-championclub.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 1999
From: RV6BLDR <calverjl(at)flash.net>
Subject: Re: Exhaust System Question
RClayp5888(at)aol.com wrote: > > > Listers, > > I am installing an IO-360 in my 6A. It looks to me that the crossover exhaust > system > sold by Van's is going to get in the way of the servo. I am also installing > the Sam James Cowl which has an air scoop that is already part of the cowl > (not separate like Van's). So...I need to line up the servo directly with the > scoop. I don't think this is possible using the High Counrty Exhaust System. > I may be wrong...but at a look at this and I think I am right. So my > question is....Is there any other exhaust systems available that are not > crossover type? If so who would I contact to find one of these creatures? > Finally, has anyone out there used this particular combination of engine, > servo (Bendix) and cowl. > Bob Claypool. 428BC (reserved), Fresno, CA > Bob, Our chapter president has a -6 with an exhaust that Larry Vetterman made for him that is not a crossover. He had to modify his cowling where pipes exit cowling. He says it really opens up the bottom of the engine compartment. Talk to Larry, he more than likely has the patterns ready and wait'n. Jerry Calvert -6 wings & fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: VP4SkyDoc(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 08, 1999
Subject: Re: RMI
Paul, I love your website, it will be a great help to me as I am also building a 6QB. After viewing your site I went as far as filling out an order form for the RMI engine monitor. But then I found the "Engine Monitoring System" on Aircraft Spruce's webpage. I once saw a picture of this devise installed in a One Design (in Sport Aviation). This system does everything that the RMI does (except OAT, clock and Amps) and costs less than half the price ($489, most sensors included) and comes ready to install. (like with the RMI, the fuel totalizer sensor is extra, but I dont know its cost) Can anyone comment on this system? I also like the RMI encoder, but it just seems so much cheaper (and at least as reliable - if not more so) to install a blind encoder and analog instruments. Do you really find it that useful? Do you find its digital altimeter to be as accurate as a good analog one? Did you install the compass feature? If so, do you find it to behave more like a CDI or a Whiskey? Thanks again for your website. Dave Leonard 6QB Wings (on Hold) > You may want to check the archives on this..there are many satisfied > customers of RMI. I have both built both of them, and have some additional > information on my website: > > http://members.home.net/rv8er/avionics.htm > > Paul Besing ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ERSF2B(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 08, 1999
Subject: tire stem access
Some time back someone posted information on the spring loaded button that was used for the tire stem access hole. I just spent a half hour searching the archives and could not find the info. SO: Where do I find this creation????? (Wicks and A.S.S. do not have it.) Thanks Ed Storo RV-8 QB ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 1999
From: Hal Kempthorne <kempthorne(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: drilling out rivets
Move on to something else making yourself a note to come back to this later. Or even, fix the bit so it can't pop out and so it serves as a very high strength rivet and get on with it. Is this your only mistake so far? hal >however, I broke off that 1/16 bit in the rivet and I am now at a loss >as to how to proceed. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <rv8er(at)home.com>
Subject: Copperstate Pics
Date: Oct 07, 1999
I have put together a page that will have daily updates on the Copperstate fly in. Thursday's section will be empty, as the fly in was just filling up. Beginning Friday night, I will be updating the site nightly at approximately 4 A.M. Zulu (GMT.) It will be: http://members.home.net/rv8er/copperst.htm Wish y'all could be here! Paul Besing RV-6A (197AB) Arizona http://members.home.net/rv8er Finish Kit ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 08, 1999
Subject: Re: Canopy track cap cover
In a message dated 10/7/99 8:10:57 AM Pacific Daylight Time, rv-list(at)matronics.com writes: << A while back someone was making the aluminum caps that cover the canopy intersection of the rear skirts. Anyone remember who that was. Of course they more than likely got rich off this and retired to Maui. >> Alas, I neither got rich, nor went to Maui. Worse yet, I'm fresh out of the little critters, so I guess that'll teach you to procrastinate. I could make more, but I need a hydraulic press (I worked at Lockheed when I made the first 100 pieces and had access to a dandy 50 tonner). I'll let the list know if I get some more made, but until then you're on your own, unless someone wants to scalp one they bought previously or worse yet make one out of (shudder) fiberglass. -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <rv8er(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: RMI
Date: Oct 07, 1999
Thanks for the compliments on the site...as far as the Engine Monitoring System, I don't have any experience, but I think there is a "get what you pay for" break point. It seems that the RMI stuff is closest you can get without loosing quality. Since I have built both of the RMI units, I know the quality is excellent. I have heard many, many excellent testimonials on their products, and none on the Engine Monitoring System. As far as the encoder is concerned..think of the instruments it replaces, VSI, Encoder, OAT, Density Altitude, and it provides warnings that you can preset. I can not comment personally on its accuracy, but have heard that it is worth much more than it costs. You are looking at $400 for a VSI and encoder, so the additional $500 is worth it for the other functions and quality. Not to mention, it looks really sharp in a panel...you wouldn't believe how many "what the heck is that thing" comments I get when people come by to see my project. Take it FWIW, as I am not flying, and am commenting solely on the experience of other builders. Paul Besing RV-6A (197AB) Arizona http://members.home.net/rv8er Finish Kit -----Original Message----- From: VP4SkyDoc(at)aol.com <VP4SkyDoc(at)aol.com> Date: Friday, October 08, 1999 4:21 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: RMI > >Paul, I love your website, it will be a great help to me as I am also >building a 6QB. After viewing your site I went as far as filling out an >order form for the RMI engine monitor. But then I found the "Engine >Monitoring System" on Aircraft Spruce's webpage. I once saw a picture of >this devise installed in a One Design (in Sport Aviation). This system does >everything that the RMI does (except OAT, clock and Amps) and costs less than >half the price ($489, most sensors included) and comes ready to install. >(like with the RMI, the fuel totalizer sensor is extra, but I dont know its >cost) > >Can anyone comment on this system? > >I also like the RMI encoder, but it just seems so much cheaper (and at least >as reliable - if not more so) to install a blind encoder and analog >instruments. Do you really find it that useful? Do you find its digital >altimeter to be as accurate as a good analog one? Did you install the >compass feature? If so, do you find it to behave more like a CDI or a >Whiskey? > >Thanks again for your website. >Dave Leonard >6QB Wings (on Hold) > > >> You may want to check the archives on this..there are many satisfied >> customers of RMI. I have both built both of them, and have some additional >> information on my website: >> >> http://members.home.net/rv8er/avionics.htm >> >> Paul Besing > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 08, 1999
Subject: Re: -6A Brakes lines
In a message dated 10/7/99 9:43:13 AM Pacific Daylight Time, cebrowne(at)earthlink.net writes: << I would like to finish routing my brakes without the wings on, but I'm not sure where the 90 degree AN fitting should go (the drawing is ambiguous). The Justice notes say, in part: "The elbows should be placed far enough forward of the F-602 bulkheads so they do not interfere with the later placement of the F-696 tank attach angles ... The elbow is not placed right next to the gear leg because there is a gap between the fuselage skin and the heavy gusset in this area and tightening the elbow in place deflects the skin" >> Don't believe everything you read. Drill the heavy gusset for mounting the fitting and open up the skin oversized for your socket wrench. The archives have the dimensions where I placed my fittings. -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 08, 1999
Subject: Re: tire stem access
In a message dated 10/7/99 10:13:03 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ERSF2B(at)aol.com writes: << Some time back someone posted information on the spring loaded button that was used for the tire stem access hole. I just spent a half hour searching the archives and could not find the info. SO: Where do I find this creation????? (Wicks and A.S.S. do not have it.) >> Wicks has it listed on page 146 of their 1999 catalog, P/N KM713-16-064 -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 08, 1999
From: David Roseblade <davidagr(at)emirates.net.ae>
Subject: Bronze finger screen (filter)
Greetings. Does anyone have an address/tel/web site where I can purchase some screens from, I will need these to manufacture the fuel pick-up hoses. RV-6 Empenage, Wings in mind David Roseblade UAE - Persian Gulf ________________________________________________________________________________
From: PASSPAT(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 08, 1999
Subject: Re: RV-3 engine fire - fuselage wanted
look on Barnstormers.com I seen a couple of RV-3s forsale there the other day. Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: flyhars(at)attglobal.net
Subject: Re: Bronze finger screen (filter)
Date: Oct 08, 1999
David: Van's sells a finger strainer pickup for inside the fuel tank in the accessory catalog page 26. I replaced the ones that come with my QB. I hope this helps. Harvey Sigmon -RV-6AQB-Wings on ----- Original Message ----- From: David Roseblade <davidagr(at)emirates.net.ae> Sent: Friday, October 08, 1999 3:12 AM Subject: RV-List: Bronze finger screen (filter) > > Greetings. > > Does anyone have an address/tel/web site where I can purchase some screens > from, I will need these to manufacture the fuel pick-up hoses. > > RV-6 Empenage, Wings in mind > > David Roseblade > UAE - Persian Gulf > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy J. Pflanzer" <rpflanze(at)iquest.net>
Subject: Re: Poly Fiber Smooth Prime - Pinhole fillers
Date: Oct 08, 1999
Gary, In the archives, you'll find many different ways discussed. All have pro's and con's. However, if you want to get it done quick and inexpensively, try this. Go to an automotive parts store and buy a big tube of spot putty. This is not bondo, but a spot surfacing putty in an aluminum tube. Get yourself a wide putty knife. Put a big blob of putty in a spot and spread it around with the knife, pressing it into the surface. Put a very thin coat on. Cover the entire surface this way. In about an hour, you can wet sand the cowl smooth. Re-apply if necessary to cover any missed spots. The surfacing putty is very easy to sand and will sand smooth with very little effort. I finished my entire s-glass cowl in about two hours. Randy Pflanzer N417G RV-6 "Painting....still" -----Original Message----- From: Gary Zilik <zilik(at)bewellnet.com> Date: Thursday, October 07, 1999 12:49 PM Subject: RV-List: Poly Fiber Smooth Prime - Pinhole fillers > >Does anyone have experience with Poly Fiber's Smooth Prime for filling the pin holes in the S-type cowl. Is it compatible with paints/primers other than >PF's Flight Gloss. > >Are there any problems using polyester fillers such as Feather Fill on the epoxy cowl? > >Are there any good suggestions (read; easy ways) on finishing the epoxy cowl? > >Gary Zilik > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DFaile(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 08, 1999
Subject: Re: Exhaust System Question
In a message dated 10/07/1999 10:57:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time, RClayp5888(at)aol.com writes: << installing an IO-360 in my 6A >> Consider an exhaust system by Sky Dynamics, Kevin Murray, 1900 Skyway Drive, Moneta, VA (540 297-6754) He does the most beautiful metal work on exhaust systems. Most of the significant aerobatic-airshow planes have his systems. david faile, fairfield, ct mcfii/a&p faa aviation safety counselor eaa technical counselor/flight advisor christen eagle ii since '82 (n13bf) rv6 (n44df) started ________________________________________________________________________________
From: pcondon(at)csc.com
Date: Oct 08, 1999
Subject: Re: Exhaust System Question
Vetterman sells straight pipes (kit) for your -6 that may fit your needs. I have used the straight pipes on a rv-4 & rv-6 (my current & prior projects). I like the sound the straight pipes make & the simplicity of the set-up. I also didn't want the cross over pipe under the cowl......the heat radiated from the cross-overs I didn't want. Some folks like the "performance " the cross overs give however I am skeptical of the real world performance/claimed gain. I do however agree on the "textbook" reason of the gain...... Try the straights..they may fit your application...cheers calverjl(at)flash.net on 10/07/99 11:37:36 PM Please respond to rv-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Re: RV-List: Exhaust System Question RClayp5888(at)aol.com wrote: > > > Listers, > > I am installing an IO-360 in my 6A. It looks to me that the crossover exhaust > system > sold by Van's is going to get in the way of the servo. I am also installing > the Sam James Cowl which has an air scoop that is already part of the cowl > (not separate like Van's). So...I need to line up the servo directly with the > scoop. I don't think this is possible using the High Counrty Exhaust System. > I may be wrong...but at a look at this and I think I am right. So my > question is....Is there any other exhaust systems available that are not > crossover type? If so who would I contact to find one of these creatures? > Finally, has anyone out there used this particular combination of engine, > servo (Bendix) and cowl. > Bob Claypool. 428BC (reserved), Fresno, CA > Bob, Our chapter president has a -6 with an exhaust that Larry Vetterman made for him that is not a crossover. He had to modify his cowling where pipes exit cowling. He says it really opens up the bottom of the engine compartment. Talk to Larry, he more than likely has the patterns ready and wait'n. Jerry Calvert -6 wings & fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: pcondon(at)csc.com
Date: Oct 08, 1999
Subject: Re: Magneto Timing
Be sure your mag drive gear(s) are properly torqued & cottered...mine were not !!!! Sounds like you have all the tools. I ordered the weighted pointer can that rubberbands onto the spinner.....be sure your timing marks on your starter ring jive with your imperical (static) measurements...i.e. no one changed out the starter ring, cam mis allignment ect. . BTW does anyone know the propeller placement on crank relative to the timing marks ? I think I have read the 2 O'clock--8 O'clock position at shutdown is "correct".......is this more fiction than fact ? fesenbek(at)marykay.com on 10/07/99 02:34:34 PM Please respond to rv-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RV-List: Magneto Timing I'm FINALLY in a position to start up my bird and am looking for advise on purchasing the equipment necessary to set the magneto timing. I plan on doing my own annuals and have seen some of the stuff offered from Aircraft Spruce such as Magneto Timing Light, Aircraft Timing Indicator and Inductor Magneto Sychronizer. Also there is a Slick Magneto Assembly and Timing Kit offered (quite pricey at $260). I am planning to get an A&P to help me on the first crack but am looking for some help on what tools/equipment I need to get also. Gary Fesenbek RV6A Dallas, TX ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Eustace Bowhay" <ebowhay(at)shuswap.net>
Subject: Re: Exhaust System Question
Date: Oct 08, 1999
Hi Bob: I am assuming that when you are talking about the alignment problem that it is alignment in the vertical plane. If this is so, the misalignment on my RV 6 with a 0360 and a bendix throttle body was about 1 1/4 inches, the base of the throttle body being higher than the inlet on the cowl. My fix was to make a spacer the right thickness out of aluminum cut and machined out to the bore for the throttle body. This being installed between the throttle body and the filtered air box. This has been on for two years and works fine. I could detect no difference in manifold pressures or any changes in the mixture settings. Van's filtered air box is very efficient and gives me some of the highest manifold pressures I have seen on a filtered air system. Just my way of solving the problem. Eustace Bowhay ---------- > From: RClayp5888(at)aol.com > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV-List: Exhaust System Question > Date: Thursday, October 07, 1999 7:55 PM > > > Listers, > > I am installing an IO-360 in my 6A. It looks to me that the crossover exhaust > system > sold by Van's is going to get in the way of the servo. I am also installing > the Sam James Cowl which has an air scoop that is already part of the cowl > (not separate like Van's). So...I need to line up the servo directly with the > scoop. I don't think this is possible using the High Counrty Exhaust System. > I may be wrong...but at a look at this and I think I am right. So my > question is....Is there any other exhaust systems available that are not > crossover type? If so who would I contact to find one of these creatures? > Finally, has anyone out there used this particular combination of engine, > servo (Bendix) and cowl. > Bob Claypool. 428BC (reserved), Fresno, CA > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jeffrey.Hawkins(at)choicepointinc.com
Subject: Smoke System
Date: Oct 08, 1999
10/08/99 12:50:04 PM Say you want to add a smoke system to your RV. Is there a special oil that is used for this? Does any one have some plans or sketches of a system that they have installed? Thanks, Jeff Hawkins RV-8 Fuselage stuff Atlanta, Georgia ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 08, 1999
From: Amos Bechtel <abechtel(at)agctr.lsu.edu>
Subject: Re: drilling out rivets
Thanks for all the suggestions. I'm going to take another crack at it tonight and see if I can get it out of there without damaging anything. I definitely do not want to buy a new rear spar. Hal Kempthorne wrote: > > Move on to something else making yourself a note to come back to this > later. Or even, fix the bit so it can't pop out and so it serves as a very > high strength rivet and get on with it. > > Is this your only mistake so far? Ha ha ha ha ha, I consider the 50% of my time spent figuring out how to fix my mistakes the real educational part of building. Amos RV-8, still putting slowwwww build wings together ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry E James" <larryj(at)oz.net>
Subject: wing incidence (was 6A Flat Bottom Skin Interference)
Date: Oct 08, 1999
List, Bernie Kerr brings up a very interesting subject - the variance in wing incidence. I visited a fellow builder earlier this week (with much more experience than I) who mentioned changing the 20 3/16" fuselage dimension (RV-4; firewall datum to forward top of main spar carry-through) to something slightly greater. His observation was that all -4's he has seen tend to fly with the main longeron angle down at the tail ... while our building and rigging is based on having this longeron level. Is there anyone out there with good experience on this ??? I'd like to hear from anyone with first hand knowledge of this alignment and hopefully some optimization. Larry E James Bellevue, WA larryj(at)oz.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 08, 1999
From: ripsteel(at)edge.net (Mark Phillips)
Subject: Control Stops
Hello list! The recent thread on control stops and rudder pedal breakage got me thinking (hmmmmm...) Why are the stops at the control surfaces and not at the "source of the force"? With stops at the control surfaces the associated hardware must be capable of handling all the force you can apply from stick/pedal all the way to the stop. Would there not be less risk from inadvertant breakage if the rudder stops, for example, were immediately behind the pedal tube where your size 11 mashes on it, or on each side of the stick AT the stick? I'm obviously not an aeronautical type enjineer ;<) so if the answer is obvious I'll just go back to my dungeon and tearfully stare at that skin I just ruined! (not having a fun day, dammit! :<( ) From the PossumWorks in TN Mark -6A, wondering why I didn't get a quickbuild! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: A20driver(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 08, 1999
Subject: Re: Smoke System
Suggest you forget the smoke system...Know many guys that have had them...There is a special smoke oil...They will sell you a 50gal drum..Messy system in plane...Every time you use it, it covers the bottom of the airplane with a thin coating of oil and some apts forbit its use on the field..Everybody that I know that had one has removed it...If you're going to be an airshow type then its part of the business and its part of the maintenance you have to do...Jim Brown, NJ, RV-3 flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rick Caldwell" <racaldwell(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Control Stops
Date: Oct 08, 1999
Mark, We did not discuss this when I was getting an AE ed. My reasoning is the stops are best at the control surfaces because the control system is not rigid. Nothing is. If the stop is at the "source of force", then the aerodynamic force on the cintrol surface will deflect that surface to less than full value. We don't want to loose the performance the designer gave us. With the stops at the surfaces, the pilot inputs a little more on the controls to make up for the system deflection. Rick Caldwell RV-6 #24187 Just bent my fuse. fuel tank brackets. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6junkie(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 08, 1999
Subject: Re: Smoke System
In a message dated 10/8/99, 1:38:59 PM, rv-list(at)matronics.com writes: <From: "Doug Rozendaal" <dougr(at)petroblend.com>
Subject: Re: Smoke System
Date: Oct 08, 1999
> >Suggest you forget the smoke system...Know many guys that have had >them...There is a special smoke oil...They will sell you a 50gal drum..Messy >system in plane...Every time you use it, it covers the bottom of the airplane >with a thin coating of oil and some apts forbit its use on the >field..Everybody that I know that had one has removed it...If you're going to >be an airshow type then its part of the business and its part of the >maintenance you have to do...Jim Brown, NJ, RV-3 flying > Not so fast....... I sell quite a bit of smoke oil to airshows and to aerial spray operators. What you need is a good quality, high flash point, parafinnic mineral oil. Typically these products are only sold in bulk and drums. If you intend to do much smoking at all you will need a drum, becasue a good system will burn up nearly about a 1/2 gallon a minute. On a big radial it is considerably more than that. We sell smoke oil in quantities as low as 2.5 gallon jugs. As for the messy part, it is a function of how well you design you system. Try at all costs, to put your smoke tank outside of the cockpit somewhere. Try to have an external filler and put the pump ahead of the firewall. many people use outboard motor fuel tanks in the back seat. This is a guaranteed mess in your airplane. the oil on the belly is a pain, but you will learn what cleaners will remove the residue and if you keep it clean it doesnt take that long to stay ahead of it. If you dont, it is a huge mess! The real secret is how well you design you system to be clean and how far your tail pipes stick out in the wind. Talk to any spray pilot or airshow pilot, they can help you with the specifics of your design. Tailwinds, Doug Rozendaal dougr(at)petroblend.com www.petroblend.com/dougr ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6junkie(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 08, 1999
Subject: Re: drilling out rivets
Drilling out rivets? Oh yeah, I heard that some people have to do this from time to time. I never had to. Never drilled through two of my fingers (on my left hand) either. And I NEVER had to buy a replacement elevator (right side) or aileron (left side). Go a head and ask anybody (except my hangar-mates). Gary Corde RV-6 N211GC - NJ Of course you know that I'm lying through my finger-tips :-) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 08, 1999
From: Chuck Brietigam <brietigam(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Exhaust System Question
RClayp5888(at)aol.com wrote: > > Listers, > > I am installing an IO-360 in my 6A. It looks to me that the crossover exhaust > system > sold by Van's is going to get in the way of the servo. I am also installing > the Sam James Cowl which has an air scoop that is already part of the cowl > (not separate like Van's). So...I need to line up the servo directly with the > scoop. I don't think this is possible using the High Counrty Exhaust System. > I may be wrong...but at a look at this and I think I am right. So my > question is....Is there any other exhaust systems available that are not > crossover type? If so who would I contact to find one of these creatures? > Finally, has anyone out there used this particular combination of engine, > servo (Bendix) and cowl. > Bob Claypool. 428BC (reserved), Fresno, CA > Bob, you might wish to get in contact with Skydynamics and talk with Kevin Murry. He has helped many people out. Also, from what I've seem and heard, there's very little difference between the crossover, two into one, or the four separate pipe systems. Talk with my brother, Pat, there in Fresno.Chuck, RV-3's forever!! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kerrjb(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 08, 1999
Subject: Re: wing incidence (was 6A Flat Bottom Skin Interference)
In a message dated 10/8/99 1:22:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time, larryj(at)oz.net writes: << List, Bernie Kerr brings up a very interesting subject - the variance in wing incidence. I visited a fellow builder earlier this week (with much more experience than I) who mentioned changing the 20 3/16" fuselage dimension (RV-4; firewall datum to forward top of main spar carry-through) to something slightly greater. >> I would be very careful moving the wing fore or aft, you are doing a lot more here than simply flying the fuselage a very small angle difference from "spec"! Bernie Kerr, 6A finishing, SE Fla ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 08, 1999
From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Michelle Alexander" <flyaway(at)iserv.net>
Subject: vertical fin offset
Date: Oct 08, 1999
Am currently attaching tail feathers on my RV-6. Am considering offsetting vertical fin. Anyone done this and if so how much and with what result? Thanks Stan Cole RV-6 Battle Creek, Mi. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 08, 1999
From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: RMI
The following info will be "old hat" for the many RV'ers who have been flying with the RMI units, but there are many new builders who are just now discovering the existence of the uMonitor and uEncoder. I have limited experience (slightly over 30 hours) with these two units, but I believe it is sufficient to form a solid opinion. In a nutshell........I like them both. I will admit, however, that there is definitely a learning curve associated with learning to fly according to digits instead of needles. But thirty hours has been enough to get me comfortable with the system and to appreciate the engineering in the units. As Paul stated, the quality of the kits and support is excellent. I also think they represent a good value. Let's take a look at the uEncoder: Kit price; $879, which takes the place of the following instruments: airspeed indicator, $312 (remember, the uEncoder shows mph, knots, TAS, IAS, and is lighted!) vertical speed indicator, $250 altimeter, $387 (the uEncoder also shows density and pressure altitude!) outside air temp $45 encoder $175 (in addition, the uEncoder shows exactly the altitude being sent to the xsponder) altitude alerts, $? airspeed alarms, $? This comes to at least $1169 worth of conventional instruments contained in the uEncoder. I added the compass module at $230, which compares in price to a vertical card unit. The compass module works well as long as the plane is in level flight. However, I rarely consult it because heading info is usually read from the Lowrance 100 hardwired to the panel. I have not had the uEncoder calibrated by an avionics shop yet, but comparisons with other aircraft have shown the unit to be accurate. I like the trend arrows in the readouts which give you a very early indication that altitude or airspeed are changing. Another neat trick is the additional readout that can be programmed to indicate when you have decelerated to flap speed. The uMonitor ($999 kit plus some of the sensors beyond basic functions) in my opinion is an even more impressive unit when compared with capabilities and cost. I won't take the bandwidth to make the comparisons, but you can run the numbers and see how much you would spend to install analog versions of the following: Tachometer, hourmeter, voltmeter, fuel flow, fuel pressure, oil pressure, ammeter, carb temp, EGT, CHT, oil temp, clock, timers, and manifold pressure. All but a couple of the above functions are visible at all times and have programmable alarms. You can take a look at the panel in 399SB and see the panel real estate saved by using the two RMI units: http://home.HiWAAY.net/~sbuc/journal/panel4.html The addition of the EI fuel gauge (highly recommended!) and Navaid auto-pilot/turn coordinator yielded a very compact VFR panel with everything included except attitude indicator and DG. I have been very happy with all these units and the decision to go with an electron-powered panel. Sam Buchanan (RV-6, free to go hither and yon............................) "The RV Journal" http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal ------------------------- Paul Besing wrote: > > > Thanks for the compliments on the site...as far as the Engine Monitoring > System, I don't have any experience, but I think there is a "get what you > pay for" break point. It seems that the RMI stuff is closest you can get > without loosing quality. Since I have built both of the RMI units, I know > the quality is excellent. I have heard many, many excellent testimonials on > their products, and none on the Engine Monitoring System. > > As far as the encoder is concerned..think of the instruments it replaces, > VSI, Encoder, OAT, Density Altitude, and it provides warnings that you can > preset. I can not comment personally on its accuracy, but have heard that > it is worth much more than it costs. You are looking at $400 for a VSI and > encoder, so the additional $500 is worth it for the other functions and > quality. Not to mention, it looks really sharp in a panel...you wouldn't > believe how many "what the heck is that thing" comments I get when people > come by to see my project. > > Take it FWIW, as I am not flying, and am commenting solely on the experience > of other builders. > > Paul Besing > RV-6A (197AB) Arizona > http://members.home.net/rv8er > Finish Kit > > -----Original Message----- > From: VP4SkyDoc(at)aol.com <VP4SkyDoc(at)aol.com> > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Friday, October 08, 1999 4:21 AM > Subject: Re: RV-List: RMI > > > > >Paul, I love your website, it will be a great help to me as I am also > >building a 6QB. After viewing your site I went as far as filling out an > >order form for the RMI engine monitor. But then I found the "Engine > >Monitoring System" on Aircraft Spruce's webpage. I once saw a picture of > >this devise installed in a One Design (in Sport Aviation). This system > does > >everything that the RMI does (except OAT, clock and Amps) and costs less > than > >half the price ($489, most sensors included) and comes ready to install. > >(like with the RMI, the fuel totalizer sensor is extra, but I dont know its > >cost) > > > >Can anyone comment on this system? > > > >I also like the RMI encoder, but it just seems so much cheaper (and at > least > >as reliable - if not more so) to install a blind encoder and analog > >instruments. Do you really find it that useful? Do you find its digital > >altimeter to be as accurate as a good analog one? Did you install the > >compass feature? If so, do you find it to behave more like a CDI or a > >Whiskey? > > > >Thanks again for your website. > >Dave Leonard > >6QB Wings (on Hold) > > > > > >> You may want to check the archives on this..there are many satisfied > >> customers of RMI. I have both built both of them, and have some > additional > >> information on my website: > >> > >> http://members.home.net/rv8er/avionics.htm > >> > >> Paul Besing ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 08, 1999
From: Tom Barnes <skytop(at)megsinet.net>
Subject: Re: vertical fin offset
Last year I researched the archives and found some experimentation results mostly on a -4. In the final analysis, I concluded it best to leave straight ahead or slightly (1/8 - 1/4") offset to the port side. Mine is offset as mentioned but isn't flying yet. If you bought Van's empenage fairings, you should consider if there is a consequence to offsetting. Tom Barnes -6 canopy -----Original Message----- From: Michelle Alexander <flyaway(at)iserv.net> Date: Friday, October 08, 1999 8:56 PM Subject: RV-List: vertical fin offset > >Am currently attaching tail feathers on my RV-6. Am considering offsetting >vertical fin. Anyone done this and if so how much and with what result? >Thanks >Stan Cole >RV-6 Battle Creek, Mi. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 05, 1999
From: "David A. Barnhart" <dave(at)davebarnhart.com>
Subject: Re: Copperstate
>Can somebody help please? >What is Copperstate? >I assume it is an RV fly-in in Pheonix. >I would like to get a good look at a bunch of RV's. >Is this the place? Well, yes there are usually 2-3 rows of RVs at Copperstate. The Copperstate Regional Fly-in and Airshow is put on by the Arizona State Council of EAA Chapters. It is held the second weekend in October at the old Williams Air Force Base (now Williams Gateway Airport). We have been pretty successful in making this event grow to a significant size, yet retain the friendly, small-fly-in atmosphere. You'll find no price-gouging in the food court here. If you attend, be sure to stop by Aircraft Registration and say hello. Best Regards, Dave Barnhart RV-6 N601DB Flying Copperstate Aircraft Registration Chairman, Hotel Shuttle-Bus Coordinator, and general all-around go-fer ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "H. Martin Sutter" <hmsutter(at)flash.net>
Subject: Re: vertical fin offset
Date: Oct 08, 1999
----- Original Message ----- From: Michelle Alexander <flyaway(at)iserv.net> > > Am currently attaching tail feathers on my RV-6. Am considering offsetting > vertical fin. Anyone done this and if so how much and with what result? > Thanks > Stan Cole > RV-6 Battle Creek, Mi. Offsetting the vertical fin should not be necessary. The engine mount is designed with an offset to compensate for propeller torque in cruise. However, many small inconsistencies during construction can affect the final outcome regarding how straight your aircraft will fly (gear leg fairings and wheel pants are the biggest factors). Offsetting the fin during costruction is a stab in the dark at a problem that may not exist with your aircraft. I would recommend you mount it per plans and change it after you fly if you have to. Off the more than a dozen RV's I have been around in this area only a few have needed rudder trim. Martin Sutter N868CM 1,500hrs ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gummos" <tg1965(at)linkline.com>
Subject: Copperstate Dash (long)
Date: Oct 08, 1999
RV's, The Copperstate Dash was conducted today. It started at Apple Valley, CA where EAA Chapter 768 is located. Our chapter helped with the race for the first time. We met all the racers as they arrived and helped with any aircraft problems. We also provided transport to and from the hotel. The bottom line was it looks like FUN. There were several RV's in the race: RV-3s Tom McIntyre N978TM (160 HP) Frank Donnelly N66GB (180 HP) RV-6A Merril Menlove N402M (150 HP) RV-6s Gary Sobek (Birdstrike) N157GS (160 HP) Thomas Hamm N64TH (150 HP) Joe Mayer N240LT (180 HP) Walt Cannon N36WC (180 HP) Terry Saylor N25TS (180 HP) There were eight RVs in a field of 34 racers (23.5 percent). How everybody did is still unknown to me. Two RV-4s showed up but didn't race (Rumor that one was Dave Anders (not sure about the spelling) with his CAFE record setting aircraft). Where are the RV-4 racers??? Anyway, looks like a good turn out for the RV series. I sure enjoyed meeting all the RV racers. Hope to see you all back next year. (It also looked like a contest to see who could make the smallest tail wheel. Not sure, but think Tom used black paint on a plain axel. I am also not sure that any of the racers used rivits as the planes looked like they were held together with tape.) :-) GOOD LUCK GUYS !!!!!!! (not sexest, just no female RV pilots raced) Tom Gummo EAA Chapter 768 HR II - (N561FS reserved) - mounting engine, etc etc (Can't race due to the 180 HP limit.) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 08, 1999
Subject: Re: tire stem access
From: "Don Diehl" <ddiehl(at)silverlink.net>
> > Some time back someone posted information on the spring loaded button that > was used for the tire stem access hole. I just spent a half hour searching > the archives and could not find the info. SO: Where do I find this > creation????? (Wicks and A.S.S. do not have it.) Thanks > > Ed Storo RV-8 QB Our local (Puget Sound WA) Eagle Hardware has 1.00" nylon, paintable plugs that are much more sanitary than the chrome snap in covers. They are quite secure and are easy to remove. The local truck tire store had a 4" extension to screw onto the valve stem to inflate the tires. Tip: Paint a dot on the tire sidewall to help locate the valve stem. Don Diehl 36 glorious hours in my RV-4 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ammeterj(at)home.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Anyone have a handheld for sale??
Date: Oct 09, 1999
A friend of a friend is trying to find a used handheld for her husband as a gift. Does anyone have a handheld they'd want to sell for a reasonable price? I think she wants one with Comm capability only. Of course, if you've got a handheld with Comm/Nav I'm sure she wouldn't turn it down. Send any offers/info to me. I'll be sorting the info out for her. Don't want her hubby to know what's up. He doesn't monitor the RV-List so it's unlikely he'll have any idea this is about him. Thanks, John Ammeter Seattle WA USA http://members.home.net/ammeterj/ 1975 Jensen Healey RV-6 (sold 4/98) EAA Technical Counselor NRA Life Member ICQ#48819374 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "steffco1" <steffco1(at)email.msn.com>
Subject: Instrument Panel Planning
Date: Oct 08, 1999
Lister's I am beginning the process to cut my Instrument Panel. I am using both 2 1/4 & 3 & 1/8 standard instruments. Is there a min distance between the Instruments? Based on what Instruments I have in hand it seems to be about an 1/8 of an inch or the distance butting to instrument backing faces together & measuring the distance between the front visible faces. What do you say that have been through this process before me, any words of wisdom? Thanks.....Mark RV8A Fuselage & Stuff ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <rv8er(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Instrument Panel Planning
Date: Oct 08, 1999
Get Panel Planner...that will answer all of your questions... Paul Besing RV-6A (197AB) Arizona http://members.home.net/rv8er Finish Kit -----Original Message----- From: steffco1 <steffco1(at)email.msn.com> Date: Saturday, October 09, 1999 4:08 AM Subject: RV-List: Instrument Panel Planning > >Lister's > >I am beginning the process to cut my Instrument Panel. I am using both 2 1/4 >& 3 & 1/8 standard instruments. > >Is there a min distance between the Instruments? > >Based on what Instruments I have in hand it seems to be about an 1/8 of an >inch or the distance butting to instrument backing faces together & >measuring the distance between the front visible faces. > >What do you say that have been through this process before me, any words of >wisdom? > >Thanks.....Mark > >RV8A Fuselage & Stuff > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <rv8er(at)home.com>
Subject: Copperstate Update
Date: Oct 08, 1999
The update for Friday is up. Not much commentary, and pretty much only pictures of RV's...tomorrow I will be a little more journalistic..It's been a while since my newspaper photography days.. http://members.home.net/rv8er/copperst.htm Paul Besing RV-6A (197AB) Arizona http://members.home.net/rv8er Finish Kit ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV8DRIVER(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Subject: Re: Tailwheel Technique
There is also a video tape available, I think thru King, called "Taming the Taildragger". A friend of a friend loaned it to me awhile ago so I don't know who made it. It was good though. I concur on the recommendation to read Stick and Rudder, by Langwiesch. (Spelling not necessarily correct). Andy Johnson, drilling wing skins. (One, so far) In So. Fla. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <rv8er(at)home.com>
Subject: LRI on display
Date: Oct 08, 1999
I got to see the LRI today....it is a pretty neat unit...it is on the Copperstate page.. http://members.home.net/rv8er/copperst.htm Paul Besing RV-6A (197AB) Arizona http://members.home.net/rv8er Finish Kit ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV8DRIVER(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Subject: Re: drilling out rivets
Amos, for what its worth, note the price, I would try to drive the rivet out, assuming you have gotten the head off. Or has the drill broken off higher than the surface? If so, you will have to grind it down flush with the surface as you mentioned. Very carefully. You will need to provide some sort of solid backing block with a hole to receive the rivet. The heavier the better. A solid steel bar about 3/4" with a 1/4" hole about a half inch deep and long enough to reach down to the rivet would seem to me to be heavy enough. Obviously it can't be so long you can't get it into the wing. I am assuming that the wing is fully skinned. Have someone hold the bar while you drive out the rivet with a 3/32" drift. Good luck, others may have better ideas, wait a while for other approaches before you proceed. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 09, 1999
From: pagan <pagan(at)cboss.com>
Subject: Re: tire stem access
Camloc access doors for wheelpants part number KM713-16-064 $33.45ea. (pricey) I have the 97-98 ACS catalog so the page might change they are on page 105. If ACS doesn't carry them anymore then you might check with anybody who carries Camloc products. Bill Pagan N565BW(Reserved) "The original RV-8A builders page on the web" http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Launchpad/9749/william.html > > >> >> Some time back someone posted information on the spring loaded button that >> was used for the tire stem access hole. I just spent a half hour searching >> the archives and could not find the info. SO: Where do I find this >> creation????? (Wicks and A.S.S. do not have it.) Thanks >> >> Ed Storo RV-8 QB > > >Our local (Puget Sound WA) Eagle Hardware has 1.00" nylon, paintable plugs >that are much more sanitary than the chrome snap in covers. They are >quite secure and are easy to remove. >The local truck tire store had a 4" extension to screw onto the valve stem >to inflate the tires. >Tip: Paint a dot on the tire sidewall to help locate the valve stem. > >Don Diehl >36 glorious hours in my RV-4 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tim Lewis" <timrv6a(at)earthlink.net>
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Subject: Re: Paint Quantities (again)
> If you've painted your plane (or helped someone else with theirs), send > me your experiences. > 1) Paint system used. Imron over Corlar > 2) Gallons of base color used (sprayable gallons, please). I'm nearly finished (wings, fuselage, and flight controls done) and it appears I'll need what I ended up buying: 3 full gal of Imron, plus the activator to go with it. > 3) Type of spray apparatus used. (HVLP or conventional.) Conventional DeVilbiss Conventional Finish Line Gun - If I had it to do over again I'd get DeVilbiss HVLP Finish Line Gun - under $200. > 4) Percent coverage with base color (if you didn't go ahead and spray > the whole thing in the base color). 100% with white, then I'll add a few blue highlights 5) Base color. > White Complicting factors: See the "exerior paint" page on my web site. I had trouble getting the paint to flow and completely cover the dimpled rivets. Using a technique different from the instructions (but recommended by DuPont tech support) solved the problem. First, I used Corlar (dry two days) then URO high build primer on the rivet lines only. Sand most of primer off, then prime whole plane (Corlar again), then TWO medium coats (25 minutes minimum flash time) then final heavy coat. Good coverage, looks pretty good. Tim > Working on the slow bits... > > > +-- > -- > +-- > -- > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://www.matronics.com/subscribe Archive > Search Engine: http://www.matronics.com/search Archive > Browsing: http://www.matronics.com/archives List > Support Contributions: http://www.matronics.com/contribution > +-- > -- > > > ****** Tim Lewis timrv6a(at)iname.com N47TD RV-6A, painting Springfield VA http://home.earthlink.net/~timrv6a http://home.earthlink.net/~timrv6a/jpi.html - No JPI stuff in my airplane ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 09, 1999
From: "Bradley Kidder, Jr." <sparksnmagic(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Walsh
Trying to reach Denis Walsh. Denis, if you read this... please email me back THANKS! Bradley W. Kidder sparksnmagic(at)usa.net http://home.earthlink.net/~sparksnmagic ICQ 11770815 EAA 574350 RV-6A (empennage) N188FW (reserved) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: SALNED2131(at)cs.com
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Subject: Re: RV8-List Digest: 10/08/99
I'M LOOKING FOR IDEAS FOR MOUNTING THE ELT ANTENNA IN MY 8. ANY SUGGETIONS WOUL BE APPRECIATED. THANKS, ED 80127 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Persyk" <dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: vertical fin offset
Date: Oct 09, 1999
-----Original Message----- From: H. Martin Sutter <hmsutter(at)flash.net> Date: Friday, October 08, 1999 9:57 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: vertical fin offset > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Michelle Alexander <flyaway(at)iserv.net> >> >> Am currently attaching tail feathers on my RV-6. Am considering >offsetting >> vertical fin. Anyone done this and if so how much and with what result? >> Thanks >> Stan Cole >> RV-6 Battle Creek, Mi. > >Offsetting the vertical fin should not be necessary. The engine mount is >designed with an offset to compensate for propeller torque in cruise. >However, many small inconsistencies during construction can affect the final >outcome regarding how straight your aircraft will fly (gear leg fairings and >wheel pants are the biggest factors). Offsetting the fin during costruction >is a stab in the dark at a problem that may not exist with your aircraft. I >would recommend you mount it per plans and change it after you fly if you >have to. Off the more than a dozen RV's I have been around in this area >only a few have needed rudder trim. > >Martin Sutter N868CM 1,500hrs At Oshkosh I noted that all but one out of sixty or so 6es and 6As had a rudder trim tab. Rather than offsetting the vertical stab, Van's should have builders prepare for mounting the rudder trim tab while they are building the rudder, when it is easy to deal with! Dennis Persyk 6A finishing kit Hampshire, IL C38 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jerry Carter" <rv8abuild(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: RV8-List Digest: 10/08/99
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Two places that I have seen: 1) On the right rear armrest - the antenna will miss the canopy when it closes. 2) Mounted on the tail under the fiberglass faring (see Sam Buchanon's site for this where he has a picture on his RV-6 at http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal/ Jerry Carter ----- Original Message ----- From: <SALNED2131(at)cs.com> Sent: Saturday, October 09, 1999 9:43 AM Subject: RV-List: Re: RV8-List Digest: 10/08/99 > > I'M LOOKING FOR IDEAS FOR MOUNTING THE ELT ANTENNA IN MY 8. ANY SUGGETIONS > WOUL BE APPRECIATED. > THANKS, ED 80127 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JRWillJR(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Subject: Re: drilling out rivets
Can you get to the backside and pull the rivet out with dikes or a plier. shaving the outside face of a pair of dikes make a nice rivet butt puller. Can you extract the broken bit by pulling it out or did it break flush? Have you gotten off center or is the broken bit certainly centered in the rivet--in which case back the part up solidly and the gently tap it out with a punch. If you have enlarged the hole go back with an ovesize NAS rivet. I drill rivets out from behind all the time at work--shop end that is--but I know what I am doing (yea right) so maybe you could drill in from behind and weaken the butt such that it could be gently tapped out with a punch--still backing the part as solid as possibe. I like the suggestion--go on to something else--then come back laterc with a clear mind. Goodluck to you. Do not archive. JR ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BPattonsoa(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Subject: Re: vertical fin offset
I offset my fin 1/4" on my -6A. Did not need to add any rudder trim tab. On climb, the trim is 1/2 ball off, almost small enough to ignore. Doing slow flight, pedal pressure increases a little up to stall. I just rest my foot on the right pedal when climbing. Straight flight is straight. The only normal use I have for the rudder is on the ground or X winds. Makes it too easy after spam cans. Bruce Patton -96S ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HCRV6(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Subject: Re: vertical fin offset
FWIW I recently asked Scott McDaniels (from Van's) the same question. His advice to me was "forgedaboutit", based on the reality that no one really knows with any degree of certainty how much and even in which direction until after the airplane has been flown. HCRV6(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: A20driver(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Subject: Sectionals and WACs
Sometime ago a WEB advertised sectionals and wacs at great prices...Does anyone have the address??? Jim Brown,a20driver(at)aol.com,RV-3&4 flying, NJ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randall Henderson" <randallh(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: vertical fin offset
Date: Oct 09, 1999
I didn't offset my rudder because I had heard a lot of talk about Yes its needed No its not, so it seemed too ambiguous to me. Kind of wish I had, cause mine is more than 1/2 a ball off in cruise. But how would I have known for sure whether or how much I would need before flying it? I guess the guy who said he sees them on 95% of the planes at OSH had the right idea -- if you go by statistics you will need to do either the offset, or the tab. I put a little wedge on there with duct tape, need to make it a little bigger before going permanent. I'm pretty confident in the straightness of the plane and the fairings. I have an O-360/CS prop. Someone mentioned that Vans should set it up for a trim tab while you're building the rudder. I guess that might be easier to adjust but what if you end up not needing one? The wedge is a simple deal, and doesn't stick out past the trailing edge (unsightly! :-) Randall Henderson, RV-6 N6R (21 hours) Portland, OR http://www.edt.com/homewing -----Original Message----- From: BPattonsoa(at)aol.com <BPattonsoa(at)aol.com> Date: Saturday, October 09, 1999 10:29 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: vertical fin offset > >I offset my fin 1/4" on my -6A. Did not need to add any rudder trim tab. On >climb, the trim is 1/2 ball off, almost small enough to ignore. Doing slow >flight, pedal pressure increases a little up to stall. I just rest my foot >on the right pedal when climbing. Straight flight is straight. The only >normal use I have for the rudder is on the ground or X winds. Makes it too >easy after spam cans. > >Bruce Patton >-96S > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 09, 1999
From: Gary Zilik <zilik(at)bewellnet.com>
Subject: Re: Instrument Panel Planning
steffco1 wrote: > > Lister's > > I am beginning the process to cut my Instrument Panel. I am using both 2 1/4 > & 3 & 1/8 standard instruments. > > Is there a min distance between the Instruments? Not really. Whatever you are comfortable with will work. But, I warn you that the thin .063" panel that Van's supplies, close is not so good. I have mine .375" apart for the big guys and .250 for the little ones. I have a full gyro panel and even at .375 the panel looses lots of it's rigidity. Some of this is regained once the instruments are mounted and it gets better once the panel is installed. If I were to do it again I think I would use a .125 insert for the 6 main flight instruments. Gary Zilik RV-6A > > > Based on what Instruments I have in hand it seems to be about an 1/8 of an > inch or the distance butting to instrument backing faces together & > measuring the distance between the front visible faces. > > What do you say that have been through this process before me, any words of > wisdom? > > Thanks.....Mark > > RV8A Fuselage & Stuff > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 09, 1999
From: David Roseblade <davidagr(at)emirates.net.ae>
Subject: FW: HS 614 -Trimming skin and ribs for clearance
Drawing 3PP mentions to trim HS-601 PP and HS-404 to clear HS-614,this is not a problem to do, however, this will cause insufficient rivet land for the skin rivet adjacent to this area. The skin is pre-punched so no chance of adjusting it. Before I contact Van's has anybody have any comments. RV-6 Empenage David Roseblade UAE Persian Gulf ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <rv8er(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Instrument Panel Planning
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Agreed, Gary. The .063 is just a tad bit flimsy IMO...FWIW, I have a .090 panel..much more rigid..I like it much more than the .063 that Van's sells. Paul Besing RV-6A (197AB) Arizona http://members.home.net/rv8er Finish Kit -----Original Message----- From: Gary Zilik <zilik(at)bewellnet.com> Date: Saturday, October 09, 1999 7:20 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Instrument Panel Planning > >steffco1 wrote: > >> >> Lister's >> >> I am beginning the process to cut my Instrument Panel. I am using both 2 1/4 >> & 3 & 1/8 standard instruments. >> >> Is there a min distance between the Instruments? > >Not really. Whatever you are comfortable with will work. But, I warn you that >the thin .063" panel that Van's supplies, close is not so good. I have mine >.375" apart for the big guys and .250 for the little ones. I have a full gyro >panel and even at .375 the panel looses lots of it's rigidity. Some of this is >regained once the instruments are mounted and it gets better once the panel is >installed. If I were to do it again I think I would use a .125 insert for the 6 >main flight instruments. > >Gary Zilik >RV-6A > >> >> >> Based on what Instruments I have in hand it seems to be about an 1/8 of an >> inch or the distance butting to instrument backing faces together & >> measuring the distance between the front visible faces. >> >> What do you say that have been through this process before me, any words of >> wisdom? >> >> Thanks.....Mark >> >> RV8A Fuselage & Stuff >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randall Henderson" <randallh(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Instrument Panel Planning
Date: Oct 09, 1999
> Is there a min distance between the Instruments? If you are really looking for absolute min distance the only way to get it is to do a mock-up panel using the real instruments. There is definitely some variation between different "standard" sized instruments. I crammed a lot of instruments close together, and used a piece of scrap .032 AL to make a mock-up before cutting the real thing, and am glad I did. Masonite or thin plywood can also be used. Be sure to take into account the ribs and any other possible interference factors such as the canopy deck, etc. Randall Henderson, RV-6 N6R (21 hrs) Portland, OR http://www.edt.com/homewing -----Original Message----- From: Paul Besing <rv8er(at)home.com> Date: Saturday, October 09, 1999 12:32 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Instrument Panel Planning ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JHeadric(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Subject: Re: Overnight in PHO
I am looking for someone that lives on the Stellar Airpark on the Phoenix area, Chandler, I think. Especially an RV owner. I want to fly my RV6A down and the Stellar Airpark would be a good place to park for about 3 days during the period of Oct.21-24. Anybody on the list that lives there? An "appreciation" ride could be arranged and I wouldn't mind sleeping under the wing. Please reply to Jheadric(at)aol.com offline. Thanks. Jim ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jeff Orear" <jorear(at)mari.net>
Subject: Re: FW: HS 614 -Trimming skin and ribs for cl
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Hi Dave: Had the same thing with my HS. I just eliminated that rivet. Shouldn't be a problem. If you would like, trim your skin so you remove the prepunched hole for the rivet in question, and redrill a new one that has the proper edge distance. Regards, Jeff Orear Rv6A 25171 Closing first wing Peshtigo,WI -----Original Message----- From: rv-list(at)matronics.com <rv-list(at)matronics.com> Date: Saturday, October 09, 1999 2:47 PM Subject: RV-List: FW: HS 614 -Trimming skin and ribs for cl > > >Drawing 3PP mentions to trim HS-601 PP and HS-404 to clear HS-614,this is >not a problem to do, however, this will cause insufficient rivet land for >the skin rivet adjacent to this area. The skin is pre-punched so no chance >of adjusting it. Before I contact Van's has anybody have any comments. > >RV-6 Empenage > >David Roseblade >UAE Persian Gulf > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Weiler" <dougweil(at)pressenter.com>
Subject: Lord vs Barry Mts
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Fellow Listers: Opinions please on the relative merits of Barry vs. Lord engine mts. Planning the installation of my 0-360 (RV-4) and I have heard that Lord mts are smoother. Doug =========== Doug Weiler Hudson, WI 715-386-1239 dougweil(at)pressenter.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Weiler" <dougweil(at)pressenter.com>
Subject: Oil cooler - RV-4
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Listers: For the RV-4 experts: what has been the best location for the oil cooler (180 hp/CS)? Doug =========== Doug Weiler Hudson, WI 715-386-1239 dougweil(at)pressenter.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Weiler" <dougweil(at)pressenter.com>
Subject: Air vents
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Has anyone had and practical experience with the little air vents that Larry Vetterman sells (Van's also carry them). Pricey at $50 ea but seem very simple. Doug =========== Doug Weiler Hudson, WI 715-386-1239 dougweil(at)pressenter.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: flyhars(at)attglobal.net
Subject: Re: Air vents
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Doug: I use the NASA vents on the side of the fuselage on my last RV-6. They work very well, I am using the same system on my present project. You will notice almost all RV's use them, they are very efficient and even work on the ground during taxi. Hope this helps. Harvey Sigmon -RV-6AQB - Wings installed this week ----- Original Message ----- From: Doug Weiler <dougweil(at)pressenter.com> Sent: Saturday, October 09, 1999 5:22 PM Subject: RV-List: Air vents > > Has anyone had and practical experience with the little air vents that Larry > Vetterman sells (Van's also carry them). Pricey at $50 ea but seem very > simple. > > Doug > > > =========== > Doug Weiler > Hudson, WI > 715-386-1239 > dougweil(at)pressenter.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <rv8er(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Overnight in PHO
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Aint gonna happen..the runway is closed due to re-paving..I don't know if it will be open by then....I have been there many times, and don't recall seeing any RV's, but could be mistaken. Also, It is private. You may want to consider Chandler Municipal. Paul Besing RV-6A (197AB) Arizona http://members.home.net/rv8er Finish Kit -----Original Message----- From: JHeadric(at)aol.com <JHeadric(at)aol.com> Date: Saturday, October 09, 1999 8:10 PM Subject: RV-List: Re: Overnight in PHO > >I am looking for someone that lives on the Stellar Airpark on the Phoenix >area, Chandler, I think. Especially an RV owner. I want to fly my RV6A down >and the Stellar Airpark would be a good place to park for about 3 days during >the period of Oct.21-24. Anybody on the list that lives there? An >"appreciation" ride could be arranged and I wouldn't mind sleeping under the >wing. Please reply to Jheadric(at)aol.com offline. Thanks. > >Jim > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: jawilcox(at)nb.sympatico.ca (jawilcox)
Subject: RV6 for sale
Date: Oct 09, 1999
I reluctantly have decided to sell my 6. Its the third of five homebuilts, (a Starduster Too, 3 RV6s and an RV8. Finished in august 94 TT 175hrs O-320E Lyc 160hp, Colin Walker wood prop. Has tilt up canopy, gyro panel, 760Val, R50 loran, King 76a with encoder, nav lts, belly strobe and good cabin heat. Paint is a military scheme blue top white bottom invasion stripes and probably the only sharks mouth on a 6. I received builders choice at the 97 Oswego NY fly in and appeared on front cover of COPAs Canadian Flight monthly paper november 97. Asking low 50s US$. For more info and or pictures contact off list or at 506 472 0503. My 1st and 3rd RV6s are currently flying in the US. Photos can be seen at ( http://personal.nbnet.nb.ca/nielsdaj/Weyman/weyman.htm ) Will deliver for expenses. Regards Jerry Wilcox jawilcox(at)nb.sympatico.ca ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chris Browne" <cebrowne(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: 0-360 crankshaft needed
Date: Oct 09, 1999
I need an O-360 crankshaft. Hollow is preferred and uncertified is OK - Need only be serviceable. Suggestions for who to call are helpful, if you have dealt with someone reputable. Thanks Chris Browne -6A finish Atlanta Owner of an airboat crankshaft/paperweight ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 09, 1999
From: Kevin Horton <khorton(at)cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: Static Ports and position error
> >Now my question to the aerodynamicologists is this: If my position error is >essentially zero for the airspeed indicator (which it is) does this mean my >altimeter error is also likely zero? Sorry for the slow reply - I just got home from two weeks on the road. I didn't see any responses to this, so I'll jump in. The total error in the indicated airspeed is essentially the sum of three things: 1. error due to problems with the pitot pressure - the pitot pressure should be dead nuts accurate in the vast majority of cases, except at high angles of attack or with large angles of sideslip (assuming that it is well clear of the prop wash, and not in the wake of some protrusion). 2. error due to static source (also called position error, because it is due to a less than perfect position for the static source). 3. instrument error in the airspeed indicator itself. I have only seen calibration results for a small number of airspeed indicators, but they all had errors of at least two knots at some airspeed. So, if you have had your airspeed indicator calibrated, and you know what the total airspeed error is, you can deduce what the static source error is. But if you haven't had your airspeed calibrated, you have no idea what your static source error is. Just to give you a feel for the magnitude of these errors - if your indicated airspeed reads what you think it should at 150 kt IAS at sea level, but you've got a two kt instrument error - that translates into about a 0.015 psi static source position error, which would give a 27 ft error in altimeter at sea level, and about a 40 ft error in your altimeter at 12,000 ft. Not a real big deal as long as you airspeed indicator is reasonably accurate. This is a bigger deal at higher speeds, and higher altitudes, as the laws of physics start to conspire against you. There is some info on my web site on how to calibrate your ASI using a water filled manometer. See http://www.cyberus.ca/~khorton/rvlinks.html#PEC Take care, Kevin Horton RV-8 (wings 85% done) Ottawa, Canada http://www.cyberus.ca/~khorton/rv8.html http://www.cyberus.ca/~khorton/nojpi.html - No JPI stuff in my aircraft! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 09, 1999
From: pagan <pagan(at)cboss.com>
Subject: Re: RV8-List Digest: 10/08/99
Mounted mine on the right rear armrest right up against the F-807 bulkhead. I curved it around the bulkhead and held with adel clamps. Got the idea at OSH on another -8. I was going to mount it under the empennage fairing but it was too long. Bill Pagan N565BW(Reserved) "The original RV-8A builders page on the web" http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Launchpad/9749/william.html > >I'M LOOKING FOR IDEAS FOR MOUNTING THE ELT ANTENNA IN MY 8. ANY SUGGETIONS >WOUL BE APPRECIATED. > THANKS, ED 80127 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 09, 1999
From: Gert <gert(at)execpc.com>
Subject: Re: Inverted tank wiring & flap brace assembly RV-8
Scott Thanks for the tip, took me a few Shacks to find it but it was worth it. It appears theat you are further along than i am, how did you bend the FL-406C?? just squeeze it in a vice ?? It seems that my 'legs' of the 406 are bowing rather than the corner getting less than 90 degree. Gert 80721 "Scott A. Jordan" wrote: > > > Message text written by Gert: > >A while ago Scott McDaniels suggested to run the wire(s) for the > inverted tank through the z brackets which hold the tank in place. > > The smallest snap-in bushings I can find are 3/8 od. < > > I bought a small bag of various size rubber grommets from Radio Shack for > about a buck. The smallest used a hole of about 1/4" and held the wire > snuggly. I also secured the wire with a tie wrap so that I could not > easily tug it off the sender. > > Scott A. Jordan > 80331 > rudder pedals > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pursuant to US Code, Title 47, Chapter 5, Subchapter II, '227, any and all nonsolicited commercial E-mail sent to this address is subject to a download and archival fee in the amount of $500 US. E-mailing denotes acceptance of these terms. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tim Lewis" <timrv6a(at)earthlink.net>
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Subject: Re: Painting Info
> If you think your shop is dust free, guess what....Your're wrong. Ditto. I've found best results if I tack cloth the surface IMMEDIATELY before spraying.... Not 5 minutes before, then mix up the paint, then spray. I mean mix up the paint, hook up the respirator, do every other thing, then tack cloth the metal and immediately start spraying. Tim ****** Tim Lewis timrv6a(at)iname.com N47TD RV-6A, painting Springfield VA http://home.earthlink.net/~timrv6a http://home.earthlink.net/~timrv6a/jpi.html - No JPI stuff in my airplane ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson(at)carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: tire stem access
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Bill, I installed CAMloc access door on the nose gear for access to the tube stem. For the main gear, I simply cut a hole in the main gear wheelpants and stuck a metal snap plug in the hole. Of the two approaches the latter is much cheaper and works better in my opinion. The spring loaded flap on the CAMloc access door hinders getting the air gauge/filler to the tube stem. FWIW Ed Anderson Matthew NC > > Camloc access doors for wheelpants part number KM713-16-064 $33.45ea. (pricey) > I have the 97-98 ACS catalog so the page might change they are on page 105. > If ACS doesn't carry them anymore then you might check with anybody who > carries Camloc products. > > Bill Pagan > N565BW(Reserved) > "The original RV-8A builders page on the web" > http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Launchpad/9749/william.html > > > > > > > >> > >> Some time back someone posted information on the spring loaded button that > >> was used for the tire stem access hole. I just spent a half hour searching > >> the archives and could not find the info. SO: Where do I find this > >> creation????? (Wicks and A.S.S. do not have it.) Thanks > >> > >> Ed Storo RV-8 QB > > > > > >Our local (Puget Sound WA) Eagle Hardware has 1.00" nylon, paintable plugs > >that are much more sanitary than the chrome snap in covers. They are > >quite secure and are easy to remove. > >The local truck tire store had a 4" extension to screw onto the valve stem > >to inflate the tires. > >Tip: Paint a dot on the tire sidewall to help locate the valve stem. > > > >Don Diehl > >36 glorious hours in my RV-4 > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <rv8er(at)home.com>
Subject: Saturday Copperstate Pics
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Are up.. http://members.home.net/rv8er/copperst1.htm Not as much as I had hoped for, but you get the idea..there was 34 RV's today...... Paul Besing RV-6A (197AB) Arizona http://members.home.net/rv8er Finish Kit ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson(at)carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Poly Fiber Smooth Prime - Pinhole fillers
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Gary, I was just introduced to a product called Everyready #416 referred to as a metal gaze material. Found at most auto body paint supply stores. It fills pin holes very nicely, it also has an etch chemical so it also bonds to aluminum. What I liked is - it can be mixed to harden in approx 5 -15 minutes and can then be sanded. Ed Anderson Matthews NC > > Gary, > > In the archives, you'll find many different ways discussed. All have pro's > and con's. However, if you want to get it done quick and inexpensively, try > this. > > Go to an automotive parts store and buy a big tube of spot putty. This is > not bondo, but a spot surfacing putty in an aluminum tube. Get yourself a > wide putty knife. Put a big blob of putty in a spot and spread it around > with the knife, pressing it into the surface. Put a very thin coat on. > Cover the entire surface this way. > > In about an hour, you can wet sand the cowl smooth. Re-apply if necessary > to cover any missed spots. The surfacing putty is very easy to sand and > will sand smooth with very little effort. > > I finished my entire s-glass cowl in about two hours. > > Randy Pflanzer N417G RV-6 > "Painting....still" > -----Original Message----- > From: Gary Zilik <zilik(at)bewellnet.com> > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Thursday, October 07, 1999 12:49 PM > Subject: RV-List: Poly Fiber Smooth Prime - Pinhole fillers > > > > > >Does anyone have experience with Poly Fiber's Smooth Prime for filling the > pin holes in the S-type cowl. Is it compatible with paints/primers other > than > >PF's Flight Gloss. > > > >Are there any problems using polyester fillers such as Feather Fill on the > epoxy cowl? > > > >Are there any good suggestions (read; easy ways) on finishing the epoxy > cowl? > > > >Gary Zilik > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Poly Fiber Smooth Prime - Pinhole fillers
Date: Oct 09, 1999
>Does anyone have experience with Poly Fiber's Smooth Prime for filling the >pin holes in the S-type cowl. Is it compatible with paints/primers other >than >PF's Flight Gloss. > >Are there any problems using polyester fillers such as Feather Fill on the >epoxy cowl? > >Are there any good suggestions (read; easy ways) on finishing the epoxy >cowl? > >Gary Zilik Gary, A slurry of epoxy and microballoons squeegeed into the surface worked pretty well for me. I still had to do lots of buildup with high-build, pinhole filling type autoprimer followed by wet sanding with 220 and 320 grit paper. It is VERY smooth now, but took a lot of time. I used some Bondo for the big uglies where gas bubbles had formed during the manufacture...mostly around the inlets. Brian Denk RV8 N94BD back from Copperstate...tired and scorched! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Compton" <rdcompton(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Smoke System
Date: Oct 09, 1999
Texaco makes oil for use in aircraft smoke systems. It goes by the the name of "Canopus" oil. Used to be called "Corvus" oil. It is a clear, very thin oil. It is possible to find some for free. After an airshow weekend I stopped by the FBO that had hosted the airshow participants. They were more than happy to have me take the left over smoke oil off of their hands. I got a practically full 55gal drum at the great price of "if you can haul it away, it's yours." Yeah, it makes a mess. Big deal. The first time you come down the backside of a loop and there is this beautiful path through the air and you go cutting back through it at the bottom....well, until you do it, you only think you know what an "RV" grin is. RC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 10, 1999
From: Blake Harral <bharral(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Instrument Panel Planning
Tony Bingelis recommends that placing the 3-1/8 instruments on 3-1/2 inch centers will result in the minimum practical spacing. I followed this suggestion and am happy with the results. blake RV-4 N72RV - 70 hrs steffco1 wrote: > > > Lister's > > I am beginning the process to cut my Instrument Panel. I am using both 2 1/4 > & 3 & 1/8 standard instruments. > > Is there a min distance between the Instruments? > > Based on what Instruments I have in hand it seems to be about an 1/8 of an > inch or the distance butting to instrument backing faces together & > measuring the distance between the front visible faces. > > What do you say that have been through this process before me, any words of > wisdom? > > Thanks.....Mark > > RV8A Fuselage & Stuff > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: pbennett(at)zip.com.au
Date: Oct 10, 1999
Subject: Re: Control Stops
My understanding is that the requirement is to limit the movement of the control surface so it won't be limited by inadvertent contact with other structure, such as could happen during aerobatic manoeuvres (eg, elevator during a tailslide). This requires positive stops on the surfaces. Sorry, can't give a reference for this, so treat with caution. Peter Bennett RV6 Sydney > > > The recent thread on control stops and rudder pedal breakage got me > thinking (hmmmmm...) Why are the stops at the control surfaces and not at > the "source of the force"? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kerrjb(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 10, 1999
Subject: Re: Saturday Copperstate Pics(DNA)
In a message dated 10/9/99 11:43:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time, rv8er(at)home.com writes: << http://members.home.net/rv8er/copperst1.htm >> OK Paul . Guess I'm not really building an RV! Could not recognise the person with the black, blank face in the photo. Bernie Kerr, Thought I was building an RV6A, SE Fla ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Kerrjb(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 10, 1999
Subject: Re: Control Stops (re tailslides)
In a message dated 10/10/99 5:05:56 AM Eastern Daylight Time, pbennett(at)zip.com.au writes: << My understanding is that the requirement is to limit the movement of the control surface so it won't be limited by inadvertent contact with other structure, such as could happen during aerobatic manoeuvres (eg, elevator during a tailslide). This requires positive stops on the surfaces. Sorry, can't give a reference for this, so treat with caution. >> Hi Peter Way downunder! I don't plan on any tailslides,but think you are on the right track. I thought you put the control stops at the surfaces to keep a gust of wind from the rear of a surface from overstressing the control linkages when the airplane is parked on the ground. A linkage could be damaged and you would not see it during preflight. Now during flight it could break and I might get in a tailslide! Bernie Kerr, RV6A finishing, SE Fla ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 10, 1999
From: "Scott A. Jordan" <SAJ_SLJ(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: Re: flap brace assembly RV-8
Message text written by INTERNET:Gert: >how did you bend the FL-406C?? just squeeze it in a vice ??< Since my shop has a wood floor my prefered method of bending is always to use the vice and avoid a walk to the garage to beat on it with a hammer. I don't remember any problems with the FL-406C but then again it was a year and a half ago. Current problems always seem to erase past ones from memory! Scott A. Jordan 80331 Will find out today if I need the new tapered concrol rod. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: str(at)us.ibm.com
Date: Oct 10, 1999
Subject: Re: flap brace assembly RV-8
Put one leg of the angle in a vice and hit the other leg with a 5lb hammer, using a wood block to protect the angle. Check the angle after each blow with a protractor until you get your hammer "calibrated". The angle is very stiff so it's not as bad as it sounds. Regards, Sam Ray 80262 >how did you bend the FL-406C?? just squeeze it in a vice ??< ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson(at)carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Poly Fiber Smooth Prime - Pinhole fillers
Date: Oct 10, 1999
Oops, Gary the name of the product is Evercoat #416 not Everyready (must have had batteries on the mind). Sorry bout that. Ed> > Gary, > I was just introduced to a product called Everyready #416 referred to as > a metal gaze material. Found at most auto body paint supply stores. It > fills pin holes very nicely, it also has an etch chemical so it also bonds > to aluminum. What I liked is - it can be mixed to harden in approx 5 -15 > minutes and can then be sanded. > > Ed Anderson > Matthews NC > > > > > Gary, > > > > In the archives, you'll find many different ways discussed. All have > pro's > > and con's. However, if you want to get it done quick and inexpensively, > try > > this. > > > > Go to an automotive parts store and buy a big tube of spot putty. This is > > not bondo, but a spot surfacing putty in an aluminum tube. Get yourself a > > wide putty knife. Put a big blob of putty in a spot and spread it around > > with the knife, pressing it into the surface. Put a very thin coat on. > > Cover the entire surface this way. > > > > In about an hour, you can wet sand the cowl smooth. Re-apply if necessary > > to cover any missed spots. The surfacing putty is very easy to sand and > > will sand smooth with very little effort. > > > > I finished my entire s-glass cowl in about two hours. > > > > Randy Pflanzer N417G RV-6 > > "Painting....still" > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Gary Zilik <zilik(at)bewellnet.com> > > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > > Date: Thursday, October 07, 1999 12:49 PM > > Subject: RV-List: Poly Fiber Smooth Prime - Pinhole fillers > > > > > > > > > >Does anyone have experience with Poly Fiber's Smooth Prime for filling > the > > pin holes in the S-type cowl. Is it compatible with paints/primers other > > than > > >PF's Flight Gloss. > > > > > >Are there any problems using polyester fillers such as Feather Fill on > the > > epoxy cowl? > > > > > >Are there any good suggestions (read; easy ways) on finishing the epoxy > > cowl? > > > > > >Gary Zilik > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 10, 1999
From: Gert <gert(at)execpc.com>
Subject: Re: flap brace assembly RV-8
Sam Did just that. However, I noticed that the legs of the 3/4x3/4 piece were bowing too because the radiused corner is so much stiffer than the thinner legs. i.e. the bend would be in the legs just where the inside radius stopped and not in the original corner. On the other hand, the fat piece which sits against the spar bent straight with no problem to 88 degrees. getting that small piece of angle to fit was a different story all together. Gert 80721 str(at)us.ibm.com wrote: > > > Put one leg of the angle in a vice and hit the other leg with a 5lb hammer, > using a wood > block to protect the angle. Check the angle after each blow with a protractor > until you > get your hammer "calibrated". The angle is very stiff so it's not as bad as it > sounds. > > Regards, > Sam Ray > 80262 > > > > > >how did you bend the FL-406C?? just squeeze it in a vice ??< > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pursuant to US Code, Title 47, Chapter 5, Subchapter II, '227, any and all nonsolicited commercial E-mail sent to this address is subject to a download and archival fee in the amount of $500 US. E-mailing denotes acceptance of these terms. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 10, 1999
From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls(at)aeroelectric.com>
Subject: Re: LIVING with aircraft batteries
------------------ >>>A few years back I did some research into batteries for an underwater >>>propulsion device and I learned that the number of cycles that you got >>>out of a battery decreased with the percent discharge of the cycles. So >>>I am wondering what the effect on battery life is when you discharge it >>>to 5-10% of its capacity. Is that the only way to test the battery? >> ------------------ bn: It's true that a battery's life is improved by limiting the bn: depth to which you discharge it on each cycle. ------------------ >So, then, what is different about the construction of a "deep-cycle" >battery, such as those marketed as such for use in golf carts? ------------------ Deep cycle batteries pack more chemistry into the plate structure . . . generally limiting the number of plates per volume and increased spacing between plates which translates into higher internal resistance and poorer performance at low temperatures. I suspect that as the battery technology evolves, the the gap between batteries optomized for deep cycle work and cranking service may narrow. Most sealed lead acid batteries sold are used in deep cycle applications (camcorders, cellphones, power tools, etc.) so I'm sure the industry is working hard to keep this performance arena working well. In larger batteries (10 a.h. and up) there is also a need for good cranking performance. One company in particular has gone the extra mile in optimizing cranking performance in VERY small cells (1.2 a.h.). See http://199.239.60.165/ These tiny cells combined with two alternators make it now possible to remove the pigs found on most aircraft engines for starters and alternators and to forego the classic 24 a.h. battery in favor of light weight alternators, starter, and itty-bitty batteries for a DUAL electrical system who's TOTAL weight is about equal to the original 24 a.h. battery! The only sealed batteries I'm aware of specifcally made for deep cycle service are true gel-cells offered by Sonnenschein and Johnson Controls (the old Globe line). I think B&C still offers a couple of gels for customers that like them but for my money, the RG battery is the only way to go for an airplane were deep cycle performance isn't an issue. Bob . . . //// (o o) ===========o00o=(_)=o00o======== < Independence Kansas: the > < Jurassic Park of aviation. > < Your source for brand new > < 40 year old airplanes. > ================================ http://www.aeroelectric.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 10, 1999
From: C&F Hiatt <hiatt001(at)tc.umn.edu>
Subject: Re: Poly Fiber Smooth Prime - Pinhole fillers
Gary, You might try a trick that I learned when finishing fiberglass model helicopter bodies. Spray on a moderately heavy coat of gray primer then before it gets completely dry wipe it off with a cloth dipped in thinner. The result is that all the holes will be filled, let it dry and repeat if necessary. Fred ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HCRV6(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 10, 1999
Subject: Blind (pop) Rivets
Listers: Can anyone out there refer me to a source of applications information on the types of pop rivets we get in the RV kits? What I'm after is some understanding of what kind of pop rivet is OK to substitute for AD3 rivets in places like the bottom of the tail cone on a -6 where you can't reach around the tail spring mount to buck a regular rivet. IVan's manual says it's OK to use the MK-319-BS monel rivets but I'm bothered by the fact that the stem on these breaks down at the bulb so I wonder about their shear strength. know I could use 1/8 Cherrymax rivets but is that overkill? Harry Crosby (HCRV6(at)aol.com) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 10, 1999
From: Al Mojzisik <prober(at)iwaynet.net>
Subject: Re: Saturday Copperstate Pics(DNA)
Paul, My guess would be George Orndorff (sp) but you can't be too sure with the hat and shades he looks like any other bank robber!....... AL do not archive and I didn't write this! > >In a message dated 10/9/99 11:43:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time, rv8er(at)home.com >writes: > ><< http://members.home.net/rv8er/copperst1.htm >> > >OK Paul . Guess I'm not really building an RV! Could not recognise the person >with the black, blank face in the photo. > >Bernie Kerr, Thought I was building an RV6A, SE Fla > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Regina Pabo" <eldreg(at)qnet.com>
"Kelly Ralston" , "Alex S. McConahay" , "Nikki Coulas" , "Terrie Hall" , "Gummos" , , "whiting" , "Bernice Hall" , "Cheryl Smith" , "Linda Anne Craven" , "Donna Saldin" ,
Subject: Fw: Honda 20th anniversary special
Date: Oct 10, 1999
Dear Friends, Since I have owned 2 Hondas, I figured that I would pass this on to you. I got 205,000 miles on my 1991CRX when I finally sold it this year!!! It never had any major repairs done to it either, and was still running great. I only sold it to make room for my new Z3. Who knows, this could be for real !- Regina---- Original Message ----- From: Linda Hagood <lhlhlh99(at)hotmail.com> ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; Sent: Friday, October 08, 1999 7:33 PM Subject: Honda 20th anniversary special > FIGURE IT CAN'T HURT. READ ON. > > > >From: SClark1009(at)aol.com > >To: cotec(at)gte.net, NewportFox(at)aol.com, GZigner(at)deltanet.com, > >rswordes(at)wwge.com, SDANIELS62(at)aol.com, Tomlpl(at)aol.com, > >Harriet42(at)hotmail.com, reif(at)ocbj.com, DrPham(at)concentric.com, > >Jeanp(at)earthlink.net, Marlenmil(at)aol.com, drdrive(at)earthlink.net, > >SAE(at)aol.com, Mdaniel(at)imri.com, jabojames(at)earthlink.net, > >Hoemdt(at)home.com, Jbade(at)imri.com, Trbaas(at)home.com, > >Barbara-Attell(at)adsw.com, Philamold(at)earthlink.net, Veronica(at)imri.com, > >JClark7006(at)aol.com, CoachRozTX(at)aol.com, CoachYort(at)aol.com, > >LUV2DANCE(at)earthlink.net, DWDWDW(at)ix.netcom.com, TRWMember(at)aol.com, > >MUFCDANCER(at)aol.com, lhlhlh99(at)hotmail.com, > >Janet.Nagurski(at)west.boeing.com, JoySF(at)aol.com, mary(at)apc.net, > >Rachael(at)winning.com, flowcoach(at)earthlink.net > >Subject: Fwd: Honda 20th anniversary special > >Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 02:28:33 EDT > > > >have fun with this, who knows? > > ______________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > Return-path: Lrkidg(at)aol.com > From: Lrkidg(at)aol.com > Full-name: Lrkidg > Message-ID: <0.d688aa3d.252ec43f(at)aol.com> > Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 23:51:27 EDT > Subject: Fwd: Fwd: Honda 20th anniversary special > To: SarinaEMM(at)aol.com, bscomm(at)smartlink.net, JBARTELLS(at)aol.com, > CharronMJ(at)aol.com, matt(at)IWByte.com, > Bobbie.Cooper/OU=usa(at)usa.furon.com, cynthia(at)spivey.org, > irishayes(at)earthlink.net, kerrydrake(at)pacbell.net, > jeffrey.forman(at)disney.com, Tonette99(at)aol.com, DG1109PD(at)aol.com, > Mkharrigan(at)aol.com, Bjnbj(at)aol.com, sunny99(at)pop.ucla.edu, > Fabklein(at)aol.com, mefreetobe(at)earthlink.net, cjp01(at)americanisuzu.com, > Mernpudge(at)aol.com, jlrosten(at)gghltd.com, Hershanhux(at)aol.com, > mailboxpro(at)earthlink.net, SClark1009(at)aol.com, ZakIL(at)aol.com, > barrys(at)microsoft.com, bstulberg(at)earthlink.net, TeagueComm(at)aol.com, > verytrudyyours(at)hotmail.com, Virgweb(at)aol.com, nyr11(at)banet.net, > EZ2TAWK2(at)aol.com, JBSHORT(at)aol.com > MIME-Version: 1.0 > X-Mailer: AOL for Macintosh sub 56 > > > --part2_0.f363ed1b.252ec43f_boundary > > > --part2_0.f363ed1b.252ec43f_boundary > Content-Disposition: inline > > Return-path: SusanVelas(at)aol.com > From: SusanVelas(at)aol.com > Full-name: SusanVelas > Message-ID: <0.cb48f719.252e60ec(at)aol.com> > Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 16:47:40 EDT > Subject: Fwd: Fwd: Honda 20th anniversary special > To: 100725.276(at)compuserve.com, cicero3(at)juno.com, DianaDall(at)aol.com, > Feeelion(at)aol.com, jcabrera(at)mindspring.com, kujak(at)hotmail.com, > LBeggins(at)aol.com, Lrkidg(at)aol.com, MAnder3174(at)aol.com, > MAugustCo(at)aol.com, pat(at)magers.com, RSklower(at)aol.com, > shepherdh(at)home.com, SLKnuth(at)prodigy.net, TKAEG(at)aol.com, > scv13(at)columbia.edu, VincentOC(at)aol.com > MIME-Version: 1.0 > X-Mailer: AOL 3.0.1 for Mac sub 82 > > > --part3_0.f363ed1b.252e60ec_boundary > > > --part3_0.f363ed1b.252e60ec_boundary > Content-Disposition: inline > > Return-Path: > Received: from rly-yh03.mx.aol.com (rly-yh03.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.35]) > Received: from mailsorter-105-2.iap.bryant.webtv.net > (mailsorter-105-2.iap.bryant.webtv.net [209.240.198.118]) by > 2000 > Received: from postoffice-261.iap.bryant.webtv.net > (postoffice-261.iap.bryant.webtv.net [209.240.199.236]) by > mailsorter-105-2.iap.bryant.webtv.net (8.8.8/ms.gso.08Dec97) with > Received: (from production@localhost) by postoffice-261.iap.bryant.webtv.net > X-WebTV-Signature: 1 > ETAsAhR0n3L9UW6GcXaSfkAstu9kUo6QMwIUNs1MaXqHHDcxNWluEaRpCrmDYjg> From: valdal(at)webtv.net (Val Lanese) > Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 19:00:35 -0700 (PDT) > To: galaxia(at)aloha.net, EFERUCCI(at)aol.com, LLL333KML(at)aol.com, > mark(at)glossmedia.com, MDGOGGIN(at)aol.com, mercy68(at)bigplanet.com, > larrypat(at)softcom.net, ron(at)glossmedia.com, susanvelas(at)aol.com, > todd(at)glossmedia.com, TTCHAM48(at)aol.com > Subject: Fwd: Honda 20th anniversary special > Message-ID: <22769-37FAAD43-12583@postoffice-261.iap.bryant.webtv.net> > Content-Disposition: Inline > MIME-Version: 1.0 (WebTV) > > > --WebTV-Mail-14002-7412 > > it's a shot--i'll check it in a week--stranger things have happened ! > > > --WebTV-Mail-14002-7412 > > Received: from mailsorter-102-3.iap.bryant.webtv.net (209.240.198.121) by > Return-Path: > Received: from imo14.mx.aol.com (imo14.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.4]) by > mailsorter-102-3.iap.bryant.webtv.net (8.8.8-wtv-d/ms.dwm.v7+dul2) > From: MamaREP(at)aol.com > Received: from MamaREP(at)aol.com by imo14.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v22.4.) id > Message-ID: > Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 01:24:48 EDT > Subject: Fwd: Honda 20th anniversary special > To: sirkrats(at)earthlink.net, CBellin718(at)aol.com, mike(at)coughlin.org, > Sox99(at)webtv.net, Ladykobi(at)aol.com, LEdwar1038(at)aol.com, > GRyave(at)aol.com, Kenebrandy(at)aol.com, zimmy07(at)juno.com, > Kbjoseph(at)aol.com, Kpober(at)mail.microserve.net, Kevin(at)kevinrogers.net, > carl.levin(at)walgreens.com, Lisawey(at)aol.com, llook(at)juno.com, > CAPRUDOLPH(at)aol.com, Garlicgenx(at)aol.com, Gluttn(at)aol.com, > Blackrok1(at)aol.com, Shandel111(at)aol.com, A1Hemself(at)aol.com, > Macroth(at)aol.com, happy6557(at)hotmail.com (alfaalfa), > gb4590(at)ix.netcom.com, Ringo12(at)webtv.net, terri-phillips(at)onet.co.uk, > pjbeck(at)penn.com, rachfried(at)webtv.net, rlr(at)chem.ucla.edu, > rklacey(at)home.com, MASAN003(at)webtv.net, Selket(at)earthlink.net, > Shart48(at)aol.com, PALOMA1794(at)aol.com, jimsymanski(at)webtv.net, > QCOUPON(at)aol.com, Mugjiggy(at)aol.com, Valdal(at)webtv.net, > Wilkinsvy(at)aol.com, AWallis823(at)aol.com, WFLang(at)pacbell.net, > Bookdznr(at)aol.com > MIME-Version: 1.0 > X-Mailer: AOL 2.7 for Mac sub 3 > > > --part1_d4a1524d.252ae5a0_boundary > > DON'T KNOW IF I BELIEVE THIS BUT THERE IS A TESTIMONY HERE TOO. WHAT THE > HEY!! LET'S GIVE IT A SHOT, I COULD USE A NEW HONDA, MINE HAS OVER 101,300+ > MILES!! > > --part1_d4a1524d.252ae5a0_boundary > Content-Disposition: inline > > Return-path: DPlatek(at)aol.com > From: DPlatek(at)aol.com > Full-name: DPlatek > Message-ID: > Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 22:50:11 EDT > Subject: Fwd: Honda 20th anniversary special > To: sbrack(at)netzone.com, dcurry(at)psn.net, djweiss1(at)yahoo.com, > cestrada(at)csdf.cde.ca.gov, PHXJeff(at)aol.com, Hobbitat(at)aol.com, > KanePono(at)aol.com, GeminiJea(at)aol.com, Trooperisu(at)aol.com, > HParish(at)phonak.com, LoriStar2(at)hotmail.com, williams(at)deafnation.com, > LaCoure(at)aol.com, vburke(at)ll.net, tilton(at)azstarnet.com, > zechzoo(at)hctc.com, Durngood(at)aol.com, HW3646(at)aol.com, > susanecross(at)email.msn.com, spencers2(at)prodigy.net, > herzig(at)mediaone.net, esavidge(at)juno.com, bennetts(at)U.Arizona.EDU, > aslaccess(at)juno.com, cork14(at)juno.com, PLUMGON1(at)aol.com, > tazboy4you(at)webtv.net, ertitcom(at)bellsouth.net, ROBEF1221(at)aol.com, > rflaith(at)ibm.net, regina(at)indra.com, Kenr(at)ASDB.State.az.us., > PoppyMc(at)aol.com, DigImage2(at)aol.com, volybald(at)punahou.edu, > MamaREP(at)aol.com, plhougland(at)yahoo.com, PJDW3(at)aol.com, > COPDwood1(at)juno.com, Chamarsh(at)aol.com, marachne(at)spiritone.com, > Mazza(at)azstarnet.com, gallucci(at)uswest.net, MBabb80072(at)aol.com, > MillsM(at)mascorp.com, mfooks(at)hotmail.com, mnrcdhh(at)gte.net, > plum(at)lava.net, Mapgu71(at)aol.com, MMcFa43(at)aol.com, msl(at)fidcouns.com, > marepack(at)U.Arizona.EDU, msmith(at)isaaceld.k12.az.us, CJLynBB(at)aol.com, > ldrac(at)flash.net, Politeos(at)aol.com, lsaboe(at)hotmail.com, > lambrech(at)leahi.kcc.hawaii.edu, COMP4DEAF(at)aol.com, > Libby_Russell(at)Douglas.BC.CA, dbrumba(at)4dvision.net, > lunaloca70(at)yahoo.com, Apacheluna(at)aol.com, kdub1017(at)home.com, > Canasi48(at)aol.com, fraychin(at)theriver.com, Zebramind(at)aol.com, > winshka(at)goodsamhealth.org, KAWALLY(at)aol.com, Kbell(at)russell.com, > KGet824181(at)aol.com, KWallerich(at)WSGC.com, Peace48(at)webtv.net, > JPWIV(at)aol.com, Kerrimock(at)home.com, Joanne.Mock(at)thehartford.com, > jot1128(at)juno.com, jacollinsjr(at)gci-net.com, > James.Fernandes(at)gallaudet.edu, mccabe(at)silverlink.net, > JILLIENP(at)aol.com, jmikael(at)SD271.K12.ID.US, witof7(at)erols.com, > jenkdian(at)cwis.isu.edu, Babsmith(at)pacbell.net, javguy(at)webtv.net, > JBardwell(at)aol.com, JAKovarik1(at)aol.com, HPSchmitt(at)aol.com, > mhanlon(at)supreme.cde.ca.gov, smcleod(at)juno.com, GREGORYAWS(at)aol.com, > keoki@aloha net, Puunene55(at)aol.com, Gail911TTY(at)aol.com, > gah(at)u.arizona.edu, Framan(at)aol.com, Mercuryc66(at)aol.com, > LEDWARDSEA(at)aol.com, Ni4AhTa3Ah(at)aol.com, Gerv57(at)aol.com, > dlefler(at)jps.net, dgirard(at)wolfenet.com, DPlatek(at)aol.com, > Debjulia(at)aol.com, dgroth(at)longrealty.com, dturley(at)geocities.com, > dborn(at)joymail.com, Daztr(at)aol.com, laneri(at)goodnet.com, > WardECBB(at)aol.com, art4cb(at)email.msn.com > MIME-Version: 1.0 > X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 246 > > > --part2_d4a1524d.252ac163_boundary > > Another hoax????? could be but......... What do you have to lose? If it > isn't, look what you have to gain! > > --part2_d4a1524d.252ac163_boundary > Content-Disposition: inline > > Return-path: Lisawey(at)aol.com > From: Lisawey(at)aol.com > Full-name: Lisawey > Message-ID: <1b01ac9a.252a2e4a(at)aol.com> > Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 12:22:34 EDT > Subject: Honda 20th anniversary special > To: williams(at)deafnation.com, LaCoure(at)aol.com, vburke(at)ll.net, > tilton(at)azstarnet.com, zechzoo(at)hctc.com, Durngood(at)aol.com, > HW3646(at)aol.com, susanecross(at)email.msn.com, spencers2(at)prodigy.net, > herzig(at)mediaone.net, Collins_Sherri(at)proxy.state.az.us, > esavidge(at)juno.com, bennetts(at)U.Arizona.EDU, aslaccess(at)juno.com, > cork14(at)juno.com, PLUMGON1(at)aol.com, tazboy4you(at)webtv.net, > ertitcom(at)bellsouth.net, ROBEF1221(at)aol.com, rflaith(at)ibm.net, > regina(at)indra.com, Kenr(at)ASDB.State.az.us., PoppyMc(at)aol.com, > DigImage2(at)aol.com, volybald(at)punahou.edu, MamaREP(at)aol.com, > plhougland(at)yahoo.com, PJDW3(at)aol.com, COPDwood1(at)juno.com, > Chamarsh(at)aol.com, marachne(at)spiritone.com, Mazza(at)azstarnet.com, > gallucci(at)uswest.net, MBabb80072(at)aol.com, MillsM(at)mascorp.com, > mfooks(at)hotmail.com, mnrcdhh(at)gte.net, plum(at)lava.net, Mapgu71(at)aol.com, > MMcFa43(at)aol.com, msl(at)fidcouns.com, marepack(at)U.Arizona.EDU, > msmith(at)isaaceld.k12.az.us, CJLynBB(at)aol.com, ldrac(at)flash.net, > Politeos(at)aol.com, lsaboe(at)hotmail.com, lambrech(at)leahi.kcc.hawaii.edu, > COMP4DEAF(at)aol.com, Libby_Russell(at)Douglas.BC.CA, dbrumba(at)4dvision.net, > lunaloca70(at)yahoo.com, Apacheluna(at)aol.com, kdub1017(at)home.com, > Canasi48(at)aol.com, fraychin(at)theriver.com, Zebramind(at)aol.com, > winshka(at)goodsamhealth.org, KAWALLY(at)aol.com, Kbell(at)russell.com, > KGet824181(at)aol.com, KWallerich(at)WSGC.com, Peace48(at)webtv.net, > JPWIV(at)aol.com, Kerrimock(at)home.com, Joanne.Mock(at)thehartford.com, > jot1128(at)juno.com, jacollinsjr(at)gci-net.com, > James.Fernandes(at)gallaudet.edu, mccabe(at)silverlink.net, > JILLIENP(at)aol.com, jmikael(at)SD271.K12.ID.US, witof7(at)erols.com, > jenkdian(at)cwis.isu.edu, Babsmith(at)pacbell.net, javguy(at)webtv.net, > JBardwell(at)aol.com, JAKovarik1(at)aol.com, HPSchmitt(at)aol.com, > mhanlon(at)supreme.cde.ca.gov, smcleod(at)juno.com, GREGORYAWS(at)aol.com, > keoki@aloha net, Puunene55(at)aol.com, Gail911TTY(at)aol.com, > gah(at)u.arizona.edu, Framan(at)aol.com, Mercuryc66(at)aol.com, > LEDWARDSEA(at)aol.com, Ni4AhTa3Ah(at)aol.com, Gerv57(at)aol.com, > dlefler(at)jps.net, dgirard(at)wolfenet.com, DPlatek(at)aol.com, > Debjulia(at)aol.com, dgroth(at)longrealty.com, dturley(at)geocities.com, > dborn(at)joymail.com, Daztr(at)aol.com, laneri(at)goodnet.com, > WardECBB(at)aol.com, art4cb(at)email.msn.com > MIME-Version: 1.0 > X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 26 > > > > > > Date: Thursday, September 30, 1999 7:53 PM > > Subject: Fw: New Wheels! Please forward... > > > >Check this out guys! > >Dear valued potential customers: > >Here at Honda we have been well known for over 20 years > >for providing the best in reliability, comfort, and style. Over the years > >we have risen to be one of the top auto industries here in Japan. But > >that isn't enough. We want to be number one in the US. Now our twentieth > >anniversary > >for making cars is here!!! This is the perfect opportunity for you and us > >here at > >Honda to celebrate our 20 years of excellent service. We have been trying > >to think of ideas to get more people to know about our cars. > >And with technology and e-mail being the wave of the future, we want to jump > >on this opportunity. So we have set up a rewards system to repay those who > >help us spread the word about Honda. Our marketing staff has designed a > >special program that traces this message as it travels across the US. Anyone > >who forwards this e-mail, will immediately have an account at their local > >Honda > >dealer opened in their name. This account will initially be opened with a > >credit of $1,000 toward any new or used vehicle at their participating > >dealership. For each person you forward this e-mail to, the amount of $200 > >will be added to your account. If the recipients of this email forward it > >you will be rewarded an additional $100 for each person it reaches and if > >they also forward it your account continues to grow in > >$100 increments. You can log onto our website at > ><http://www.Honda.com>http://www.Honda.com to > >check the balance of your account. If things go well and everyone > >participates you should see your account grow quite quickly. Follow the > >on screen > >instructions to order the specific make and model of Honda you want to buy > >with > >your account. We hope that this is a rewarding experience for you and us. > >Our goal is to reach over 1 million computers by the year 2000. > >I thank you for your time and business. > > > >Sincerely, > >Kageyama Hironobu > >Senior Honda Marketing Advisor > > > > > >Subject: FW: New Wheels! Please forward... > >I'M SURE I DON'T KNOW BUT WHAT THE HAY!!! CAN'T HURT YOU. > >Worth a shot... > >First off, I just want everyone to know that this is the real thing. I > >forwarded this message to everyone I know about 6 months ago and last week > >a Honda employee showed up at my house with my brand new 1999 Civic > >EX!!! It is so funny because I never > >believed these things worked and actually I sent this one as a joke to all > >my friends. But > >they forwarded the message too and now I have received a new car!!! > >My best friend actually hasn't gotten his car just yet but he checked the > >balance of his Honda Account and it has reached nearly $11,000!!! > >Honda's or you just want a new car, please forward this message it is the > >real thing. > > > >Bob Stanley, Denver Colorado > > > >Friends, Look I know this sounds too good to be true, and that's what I > >thought too. But I called Honda's headquarters in Japan and spoke to an > >American representative myself and it really is true! They assured me that > >this the real thing! I still wasn't > >convinced but I called three weeks later and my Honda account balance has > >reached the unbelievable sum of $12,500!!! So even if you don't believe > >this, forward it anyway so my account will continue to grow until I get my > >brand new Prelude!!! > > > >Steve Kelly, Minneapolis > >Minnesota______________________________________________________________ > > > > > --part2_d4a1524d.252ac163_boundary-- > > --part1_d4a1524d.252ae5a0_boundary-- > > --WebTV-Mail-14002-7412-- > > --part3_0.f363ed1b.252e60ec_boundary-- > > > --part3_0.f363ed1b.252e60ec_boundary-- > > > --part2_0.f363ed1b.252ec43f_boundary-- > > --part1_0.f363ed1b.252ee911_boundary-- > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JTB520(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 10, 1999
Subject: Re: George's photo
How do you get the photos on copperstate? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 10, 1999
Subject: Re: Blind (pop) Rivets
In a message dated 10/10/99 1:10:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time, HCRV6(at)aol.com writes: << What I'm after is some understanding of what kind of pop rivet is OK to substitute for AD3 rivets in places like the bottom of the tail cone on a -6 where you can't reach around the tail spring mount to buck a regular rivet. IVan's manual says it's OK to use the MK-319-BS monel rivets but I'm bothered by the fact that the stem on these breaks down at the bulb so I wonder about their shear strength. >> Harry- Back when I started my kit, I did this shear testing and I think the data is in the archives. IIRC the MK-319-BS was only slightly poorer in shear than the AD426-3. It does however require a 7/64" hole. I used them only where I couldn't buck the real ones and they are fine. -GV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Frank A. Reed" <fareed(at)ibm.net>
Subject: EGT & Fuel Flow Question
Date: Oct 10, 1999
I have just purchased an RV-6A with a Lycoming 160 and Hartzell constant speed prop. Total time on the airframe, engine and prop is now 120 hours. I have flown it for the last 14 of those hours including a trip from GA to NH to bring it home. I first noticed a low fuel flow of 7 to 7.5 GPH on the way home. I was new to fuel flow instrumentation and did not track the actual fuel burned as compared to what the totalizer read. I also did not know what exact power setting I had since the engine manual was a copy and the power curves are virtually unreadable. I have since obtained readable curves. The EGT read about 750 to 770C and I did not immediately recognize just how high this was since I did not do the mental conversion to F. At 5500 feet I did lean for peak up to about 825C and then went back on the rich side to 775C or so. I started to get a little roughness at about the time I was reaching peak. Having had the airplane home for about two weeks, and now having some idea of where 75% is at various altitudes, I am still seeing EGT in the high 700's and fuel flow in the 7.5GPH range with mixture in full rich. Again, I can still lean with the mixture control coming out at least an inch and a half from the panel and the EGT going above 800C. I originally thought that I was perhaps running at peak with the mixture all the way in but that is apparently not the case. I have, however, determined that the fuel flow totalizer is accurate within 1/2 gallon in 20 so I assume that the fuel flow figures are also reasonably accurate. For reference, 700C = 1292F, 750C = 1382F, 800C = 1472F. My manual on the engine analyzer says that the EGT portion cannot be calibrated since the electronics of the instrument and the sensors determine the accuracy. I assume the sensors are thermocouples and not RDT's??? I am strongly suspicious that the EGT readings are wrong and next weekend I will try to determine whether they are anywhere near correct at 100C which is about as high as I can check them with boiling water. My question is: Have any other 6 or 6A operators with the 160/cs seen anything like these numbers? I realize that I need to be more precise in determining all of the parameters including PA, fuel flow, CHT and EGT for each cylinder etc. but I am concerned enough about cooking the engine so that I thought I would throw the question out for the wisdom of the group. Will appreciate any thoughts. Frank Reed N89PC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 10, 1999
From: Cy Galley <cgalley(at)accessus.net>
Subject: Re: EGT & Fuel Flow Question
ALL EGT temperatures are RELATIVE. There are so many variables that it is hard to list them all. First is the probe location. The farther down the exhaust stack that cooler they read. The temperature that is registered is a function of power. The more power that the cylinder is producing the greater the temperature. There is NOT a red line. The amount of power that any engine can produce is a function of atitude, air density, and throttle setting. It is also affected by cylinder condition, timing, and the induction system. The mixture, air temperature, even the humidity affect power out put. The basic use for an EGT is to find the peak temperature for that cylinder under the current operating conditions. Peak power is slightly rich of this point. Best economy occurs about 50 degrees lean of peak but all cylinders do not peak at the same time. You should talk to George Brally who makes the GAMI injectors for IO-470, etc. These injectors balance the power so that all cylinders reach peak EGT at approximately the same time. The reason for your roughness, is one off your cylinders is leaner than the cylinder where the EGT is installed and is reaching peak temp before where you are measuring the temperature. Your temperatures are not high. The position of the mixture control also is relative. Finally, checking the probes with boiling water is a complete waste of time. Analog gages are only accurate in the middle of the scale. Even if you have a digital gage, 100 degrees Celius is so far from the normal measurements that it could be off by 10 degrees or more but be relatively right for your operating temperatures. Once again... ALL EGT readings ar relative!! Sounds like you have a great plane. > >I have just purchased an RV-6A with a Lycoming 160 and Hartzell constant >speed prop. Total time on the airframe, engine and prop is now 120 hours. >I have flown it for the last 14 of those hours including a trip from GA to >NH to bring it home. > >I first noticed a low fuel flow of 7 to 7.5 GPH on the way home. I was new >to fuel flow instrumentation and did not track the actual fuel burned as >compared to what the totalizer read. I also did not know what exact power >setting I had since the engine manual was a copy and the power curves are >virtually unreadable. I have since obtained readable curves. > >The EGT read about 750 to 770C and I did not immediately recognize just how >high this was since I did not do the mental conversion to F. At 5500 feet >I did lean for peak up to about 825C and then went back on the rich side to >775C or so. I started to get a little roughness at about the time I was >reaching peak. > >Having had the airplane home for about two weeks, and now having some idea >of where 75% is at various altitudes, I am still seeing EGT in the high >700's and fuel flow in the 7.5GPH range with mixture in full rich. Again, >I can still lean with the mixture control coming out at least an inch and a >half from the panel and the EGT going above 800C. I originally thought that >I was perhaps running at peak with the mixture all the way in but that is >apparently not the case. I have, however, determined that the fuel flow >totalizer is accurate within 1/2 gallon in 20 so I assume that the fuel >flow figures are also reasonably accurate. For reference, 700C = 1292F, >750C = 1382F, 800C = 1472F. My manual on the engine analyzer says that the >EGT portion cannot be calibrated since the electronics of the instrument >and the sensors determine the accuracy. I assume the sensors are >thermocouples and not RDT's??? > >I am strongly suspicious that the EGT readings are wrong and next weekend I >will try to determine whether they are anywhere near correct at 100C which >is about as high as I can check them with boiling water. My question is: >Have any other 6 or 6A operators with the 160/cs seen anything like these >numbers? I realize that I need to be more precise in determining all of >the parameters including PA, fuel flow, CHT and EGT for each cylinder etc. >but I am concerned enough about cooking the engine so that I thought I >would throw the question out for the wisdom of the group. Will appreciate >any thoughts. > >Frank Reed N89PC > > Cy Galley - Editor, B-C Contact! Visit our web site at... http://www.bellanca-championclub.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Rozendaal" <dougr(at)petroblend.com>
Subject: Re: EGT & Fuel Flow Question
Date: Oct 10, 1999
Frank, The actual temperature readings on your EGT are not important. Typically on non-turbo charged engines the EGT gauges are not labeled with temps, just 25 deg graduations. what the actual temp is is not important. Just determine what peak is and then work from there. However, my RV-4 with an FP IO-320 has a calibrated EGT gauge and my temps are almost identical to the numbers you are seeing, so I would guess that your gauge is accurate. Depending on what RPM you are using, your fuel flow sounds about right also. Tailwinds, Doug Rozendaal dougr(at)petroblend.com www.petroblend.com/dougr > >I am strongly suspicious that the EGT readings are wrong and next weekend I >will try to determine whether they are anywhere near correct at 100C which >is about as high as I can check them with boiling water. My question is: >Have any other 6 or 6A operators with the 160/cs seen anything like these >numbers? I realize that I need to be more precise in determining all of >the parameters including PA, fuel flow, CHT and EGT for each cylinder etc. >but I am concerned enough about cooking the engine so that I thought I >would throw the question out for the wisdom of the group. Will appreciate >any thoughts. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: flyhars(at)attglobal.net
Subject: Re: EGT & Fuel Flow Question
Date: Oct 10, 1999
Frank: The numbers you quoted look about right to me. My last RV-6 was equipped with an I0-320 and hartzell propeller. At 65% it would burn about 7.9 GPH and the EGT using Electronic International gage would run about 1380 degrees F at peak using #3 cylinder. Sounds like you have a super RV, enjoy. Harvey Sigmon- RV-6AQB- Wing stuff ----- Original Message ----- From: Doug Rozendaal <dougr(at)petroblend.com> Sent: Sunday, October 10, 1999 10:49 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: EGT & Fuel Flow Question > > Frank, > > The actual temperature readings on your EGT are not important. Typically on > non-turbo charged engines the EGT gauges are not labeled with temps, just 25 > deg graduations. what the actual temp is is not important. Just determine > what peak is and then work from there. However, my RV-4 with an FP IO-320 > has a calibrated EGT gauge and my temps are almost identical to the numbers > you are seeing, so I would guess that your gauge is accurate. Depending on > what RPM you are using, your fuel flow sounds about right also. > > Tailwinds, > Doug Rozendaal > dougr(at)petroblend.com > www.petroblend.com/dougr > > > > > >I am strongly suspicious that the EGT readings are wrong and next weekend I > >will try to determine whether they are anywhere near correct at 100C which > >is about as high as I can check them with boiling water. My question is: > >Have any other 6 or 6A operators with the 160/cs seen anything like these > >numbers? I realize that I need to be more precise in determining all of > >the parameters including PA, fuel flow, CHT and EGT for each cylinder etc. > >but I am concerned enough about cooking the engine so that I thought I > >would throw the question out for the wisdom of the group. Will appreciate > >any thoughts. > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 10, 1999
From: "Gary A. Sobek" <rv6flier(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: EGT & Fuel Flow Question
--- "Frank A. Reed" wrote: > > > I have just purchased an RV-6A with a Lycoming 160 > and Hartzell constant > speed prop. --------- snip --------- > My question is: > Have any other 6 or 6A operators with the 160/cs > seen anything like these > numbers? I realize that I need to be more precise > in determining all of > the parameters including PA, fuel flow, CHT and EGT > for each cylinder etc. > but I am concerned enough about cooking the engine > so that I thought I > would throw the question out for the wisdom of the > group. Will appreciate > any thoughts. > > Frank Reed N89PC Frank: I have 438 hours on my O-320 CS RV-6. Your numbers sounds nominal. My CHTs, EGTs, and oil temp are accurate at 100 C. Following are my numbers. At 150 KTAS, 7.3 GPH ~ 60% power EGT peaks 855 - 860 C At 160 KTAS, 8.0-8.5 GPH ~ 70%, EGT Peaks 830-860 C At 166 KTAS, 9.4 GPH, 75-81%, EGT Peak 830-860 I try to run at 800 C so as to be 100 F of rich for peak power. At 172-175 KTAS, 9.9 - 11.5 GPH, 81-90%, Try to run on the rich side of 800 C so as to be slightly rich. I purchased 27.7 gallons after running the Copperstate Dash. I only had 31 gallons on board when I took off. Fuel flow showed 11.5 GPH the whole race with TAS sitting at 175-178 Kts the whole way. Too bad there was a head wind so that everyones time could have been better. Check my time when it is published. ==== Gary A. Sobek "My Sanity" RV-6 N157GS O-320 Hartzell, So. CA, USA Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 11, 1999
From: Dr Leo Davies <leo(at)icn.usyd.edu.au>
Subject: First Flight VH-LDX
Dear List, After a 6 year and 2 month gestation VH-LDX is out of the womb. Birth Weight: 1146 lbs RV6A Sliding Canopy 0-360 A1A with CSU Electric elevator trim Manual aileron trim S-Tec system 50 DG King Navcom with GS II Morrow SL60 GPS/Com King ADF King Transponder PMA6000 audio panel Heated Pitot DG/AH Electrics per big bad Bob First flight: 3 laps at 1500 feet and 24" at 2450 rpm pretty much a blur, left wing a little heavy. Second flight: an hour over the country at 75% power: don't things come up quickly at 180 mph! Looking forward to the test flight program My special thanks to: Van Frank Justice Bill Benedict Gary Van Remortel Bob Nuckolls Scott McDaniels Randall Henderson Peter Bennett Leo Davies VH-LDX (flying) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 10, 1999
From: Brian Lloyd <brian(at)lloyd.com>
Subject: Re: LRI & Flap Position ?
On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Vaso Bovan wrote: > -------------Forwarded Message----------------- > > From: Jim Huntington, INTERNET:jimrhunt(at)wco.com > To: Vaso Bovan, Vaso_Bovan > Date: 10/10/1999 9:52 AM > > RE: Re: LRI & Flap Position ? > > Vaso, > > This is an important question. The simple answer is this: the LRI is not > affected by flap position. > > To be more precise, when subjected to extensive flight testing and wind > tunnel testing by Cessna it was determined that flap position had a > neglible effect to the conservative side, meaning that the lift reserve > values were marginally higher than indicated. In other words, the LRI is affected by flap position. This statement is in direct conflict with your previous assertion. OK, it is minimal but it exists. It is conservative but it exists. This is as I assumed it would be given that the LRI detects AoA by virtue of differential pressure across the 90 degree face of the pitot-like "probe" tube. Since that is fixed relative to the airframe and the relative wind associated with a given AoA shifts with flap deployment, the calibration of the LRI shifts with flap deployment. > To be factored into this consideration is the fact that the LRI does not > rely on a complex system of micro switches whose lifetime and ruggedness > are unknown, One microswitch or two depending on your taste. Microswitches have a long history of reliable service in aircraft. Also, should a switch fail, the change in the display is quite obvious alerting the pilot to the problem. This is a non-issue. > nor does it rely on two very small holes in the wing for input > that are subject to rain, frost, wax and other kinds of fouling. Well, I now have 200 hours of experience with the AoA unit from Proprietary Software Systems. I have *never* had any problems with fouling of the pressure sensing ports on the top and bottom of the wing in spite of waxing the airplane and/or flying in rain. If you have frost or ice on your wing your calibration of either PSS AoA or LRI goes out the window since the critical AoA is probably significantly different so your argument seems specious to me. I suspect that the LRI is just as subject to fouling by the occasional large insect impacting on the LRI differential pitot probe too. > Also, the LRI does not piggy-back an the pitot static system. And that is an advantage? Being required to cut an additional hole in your airplane to locate the LRI probe is an advantage? OK, if I really want to I can add a second pitot tube for the PSS AoA (required in certified aircraft) and that makes it more like a LRI but I would rather be able to tap into the existing pitot/static system and not be required to cut additional holes in my airplane. > The LRI offers heat. And the PSS AoA doesn't need it because the pitot tube is probably already heated. Or are you suggesting that it will help keep the pilot warm? ; ) > The LRI indicates sufficient lift for rotation and lift off, density > altitude correct - something no other system has ever been able to do. Since the PSS AoA is a true AoA indicator, it does the same thing. I have tested it at altitude (~10,000 ft pressure altitude) and I can attest that it indicates critical angle of attack, clean or dirty, 1G or 4G, at 10,000' just as accurately as it does near sea level. When it indicates 1.15 x Vs(0/1) it is right on. The PSS AoA also has markings to indicate best L/D and, while I have not verified that it is precisely at best L/D, it does occur where I would expect best L/D to occur given Vy so I believe it is relatively accurate in this regard. How does the LRI indicate best L/D given varying aircraft configurations? > There is more to be said in comparison of available systems. Obviously, I > consider the LRI the best instrument on the market today, with hundreds of > thousands of hours of flight in many, many types of aircraft from 737 to > 150's as proof of its versatility, simplicity and durability. It is also > the best value. But it is a series of compromises. That does not detract from its value. But to attempt to run down a similar product is not good marketing especially if you get your facts wrong. I am not running down the LRI, I am only questioning its accuracy under differing conditions. Certainly the pilot can figure out what the differences are between LRI indications at Vs0 and Vs1 and correct accordingly. The LRI is still useful at both configurations. But to claim that the LRI is somehow better than the PSS AoA, sorry, that doesn't wash in my book. Were I marketing the LRI I would be brutally honest about how it works and point out that it is a *simpler* system that does not rely on the aircraft's electrical system. I would also freely admit that it does have slightly differing indications at Vs0 and Vs1 but that it is still useful in both configurations. I would lastly point out the the LRI is less expensive and offers an alternative to the more-expensive PSS AoA instrument. All of the above are true and people on a budget will have real information from which to make reasoned decisions about which they would prefer in their aircraft. Personally I think that the LRI is a good instrument. I also think that the PSS AoA instrument is better. I believe, from personal experience, that the PSS AoA is *very* accurate under all conditions in my airplane. I also like the fact that it tells me very clearly in my headphones when I am getting close to stall (the "angle, angle, push," announcement at 1.15 x Vs). To me it was worth the extra money. Someone else may decide that the LRI is a better value. That is quite reasonable. But please do not try to convince me that the LRI is a better instrument. Better value? Maybe. Better instrument? Absolutely not. The above represents my opinion. Your milage may vary. > Regards, > > Jim > > > > > > >>Having the LRI is a good backup to the ASI. With LRI (I prefer the AoA > >>indicator from proprietary systems since it adapts to flaps up/down where > >>LRI does not appear to do that) you can still fly the correct approach > >>speed.< > > > > > >Jim: > > > >Care to comment on this issue of flaps ? Can the LRI be placed so that it > >indicates the same lift condition regardless of flap position ? > > > >-Vaso > Brian Lloyd brian(at)lloyd.com +1.530.676.6513 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ammeterj(at)home.com (John Ammeter)
Subject: Anyone have a handheld for sale??
Date: Oct 09, 1999
A friend of a friend is trying to find a used handheld for her husband as a gift. Does anyone have a handheld they'd want to sell for a reasonable price? I think she wants one with Comm capability only. Of course, if you've got a handheld with Comm/Nav I'm sure she wouldn't turn it down. Send any offers/info to me. I'll be sorting the info out for her. Don't want her hubby to know what's up. He doesn't monitor the RV-List so it's unlikely he'll have any idea this is about him. Thanks, John Ammeter Seattle WA USA http://members.home.net/ammeterj/ 1975 Jensen Healey RV-6 (sold 4/98) EAA Technical Counselor NRA Life Member ICQ#48819374 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 11, 1999
From: Carroll Bird <catbird(at)taylorelectric.com>
Subject: Re: Oil cooler - RV-4
Carroll Bird wrote: > > > Doug Weiler wrote: > >> >> >> Listers: >> >> For the RV-4 experts: what has been the best location for the oil >> cooler >> (180 hp/CS)? >> >> Doug >> >> =========== >> Doug Weiler >> Hudson, WI >> 715-386-1239 >> dougweil(at)pressenter.com >> > > Doug: I mounted mine behind the #4 cylinder on the engine mount. > Made a bracket from 3/4 angle and Adell clamps. > > Carroll Bird RV-4 39 hours and counting. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Busick" <panamared(at)brier.net>
Subject: Re: RMI
Date: May 17, 1999
Check out the Grand Rapids Technologies, Engine Monitor for $999. It has monitoring for 4 CHTs, 4 EGTs and all of the other stuff on the RMI. The only thing the RMI has that the GRT does not is Amps. You can find their phone number in an ad in the back of Kitplanes. They also have a web site, http://www.hometown.aol.com/enginfosys You want the four cylinder model, not the ultralight model. This model includes most of the sensors. The RMI enginer monitor as I read the ads does not come with sensors. On this list I have heard good things about the GRT as well as the RMI. The GRT gives a 1 year all money back if not satisfied and 2 year warranty. Options for the GRT Engine Monitor also include, altimeter, VSI and airspeed. Bob Busick > . But then I found the "Engine >Monitoring System" on Aircraft Spruce's webpage. I once saw a picture of >this devise installed in a One Design (in Sport Aviation). This system does >everything that the RMI does (except OAT, clock and Amps) and costs less than >half the price ($489, most sensors included) and comes ready to install. >(like with the RMI, the fuel totalizer sensor is extra, but I dont know its >cost) > >Can anyone comment on this system? > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Eric.J.Henson(at)chase.com
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 2.0.15) with SMTP id for" ; Mon, 11 Oct 1999 09:29:06.-0400(at)matronics.com
Date: Oct 11, 1999
Subject: Re: vertical fin offset
Hi Stan, I am also troubled by the percentage of rudder tabs I have seen. Just my opinion, but an offset rudder just looks "WRONG". I am a nut for symmetry, but my main concern is stress. You fall out of a loop and hit VNE That whole rudder is being torked to the side. Definitely increased potential for failure. This was not factored into the construction of the assy. A while back Jim Cone (Van's Airforce Newsletter) published a shematic for a rudder trim that acts the same way as Van's Aileron system, spring bias. Since everyone says Vans aileron system works fine, I have to think Jim's system will eliminate the need for a tab. Seems like the same critter. But then I'm just a simple country boy. Eric Henson Mason-Dixon Engineering >>Am currently attaching tail feathers on my RV-6. Am considering offsetting vertical fin. Anyone done this and if so how much and with what result? Thanks Stan Cole RV-6 Battle Creek, Mi.<< ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 11, 1999
From: Glenn & Judi <glenng(at)megsinet.net>
Subject: stall vane location
Hi, I have a PA-28 type stall warning vane I would like to install on my RV-6. RE: location of the unit on the leading edge I received the following advice... >It is mounted 21 1/4" forward of the leading edge top >skin intersection and 20 3/4" inboard of the wing tip less the >fiberglass tip. I would seem to make more sense to mount the unit further inboard. I think just outside the fuel tank would make the most sense because a rectangular wing planform stalls inboard first. The RV-6 airfoil in constant throughout it's span without no washout, therefore the critical angle of attack is constant, therefore the vane should be mounted at the same location. Right? Any Aerodymanic Engineer/rocket scientist types care to comment on my logic before I cut a hole into my wing. Any input, or tales of experience are greatly appreciated. -Glenn Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Charles Rowbotham" <crowbotham(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: First Flight VH-LDX
Date: Oct 11, 1999
Leo, CONGRATULATIONS & WELL DONE!!! Best Wishes, Chuck & Dave Rowbotham RV-8A (still building) Niantic, CT ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 11, 1999
From: Cy Galley <cgalley(at)accessus.net>
Subject: Re: stall vane location
You want it out side of the disturbed air of the prop blast. It gets wider as it leaves the prop. > >Hi, >I have a PA-28 type stall warning vane I would like to install on my >RV-6. RE: location of the unit on the leading edge I received the >following advice... > >It is mounted 21 1/4" forward of the leading edge top >>skin intersection and 20 3/4" inboard of the wing tip less the >>fiberglass tip. > >I would seem to make more sense to mount the unit further inboard. I >think just outside the fuel tank would make the most sense because a >rectangular wing planform stalls inboard first. >The RV-6 airfoil in constant throughout it's span without no washout, >therefore the critical angle of attack is constant, therefore the vane >should be mounted at the same location. Right? > >Any Aerodymanic Engineer/rocket scientist types care to comment on my >logic before I cut a hole into my wing. > >Any input, or tales of experience are greatly appreciated. > >-Glenn Gordon > > Cy Galley - Editor, B-C Contact! Visit our web site at... http://www.bellanca-championclub.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Lothar Klingmuller <lothark(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: how soon we forget
Date: Oct 11, 1999
Kevin, in the interest of th list and those of of to follow in the next mellinium I have two quetions: A) How much will it cost you to get your plane painted? B) Would you do it again: fly first, paint later? Thanks, Do not archieve >It will be worth simply not having to listen to "when you gonna' get it >painted?". I took N3773 to Kelso and gave her the complete "strip search" >right there on the ramp while we waited for a Cardinal to dry and free up >some hangar space. It's been flying for two years, and I've taken the cowl Lothar |||-6A tip up; odd tasks before starting canopy ||| Lakewood/ Denver, CO ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 11, 1999
From: Hal Kempthorne <kempthorne(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: vertical fin offset
Stan, I know nothing about the need or not for rudder tabs but I do know that engineering is not best done by "looks wrong" or by being always in symmetry. Space the bolt holes in a round part in a non-symmetrical pattern to ensure that the mechanic puts it on correctly for example. The tail on straight tail Bonanzas and Debonairs (still for sale) are offset from the centerline and one flap must be up slightly more than the other. The natural human urge for symmetry is just one more thing engineers need to get over. Hal Kempthorne, PE >Technologies SMTPRS 2.0.15) with SMTP id > for > >I am also troubled by the percentage of rudder tabs I have seen. Just my >opinion, but an offset rudder just looks "WRONG". I am a nut for symmetry, ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <rv8er(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: George's photo
Date: Oct 11, 1999
go to http://members.home.net/rv8er/copperst.htm for Friday and http://members.home.net/rv8er/copperst1.htm for Saturday.. Paul Besing RV-6A (197AB) Arizona http://members.home.net/rv8er Finish Kit -----Original Message----- From: JTB520(at)aol.com <JTB520(at)aol.com> Date: Monday, October 11, 1999 3:40 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: George's photo > >How do you get the photos on copperstate? > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 11, 1999
From: Kevin Horton <khorton(at)cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: stall vane location
> >Hi, >I have a PA-28 type stall warning vane I would like to install on my >RV-6. RE: location of the unit on the leading edge I received the >following advice... > >It is mounted 21 1/4" forward of the leading edge top >>skin intersection and 20 3/4" inboard of the wing tip less the >>fiberglass tip. > >I would seem to make more sense to mount the unit further inboard. I >think just outside the fuel tank would make the most sense because a >rectangular wing planform stalls inboard first. >The RV-6 airfoil in constant throughout it's span without no washout, >therefore the critical angle of attack is constant, therefore the vane >should be mounted at the same location. Right? > >Any Aerodymanic Engineer/rocket scientist types care to comment on my >logic before I cut a hole into my wing. > >Any input, or tales of experience are greatly appreciated. > >-Glenn Gordon > Glenn, You want it far enough outboard to be well clear of the prop wash, and far enough inboard to be well clear of the messed up flow around the wing tips. The spanwise location you described sounds OK. I can't comment on the chordwise location. This thing senses the movements of the stagnation point, which is the location on the leading edge where the airflow splits - the air that hits above the stagnation point goes over the top of the wing, and the air that hits below the stagnation point goes under the wing. The stagnation point moves further down the leading edge as the angle of attack increases. The local angle of attack of each wing station varies - it is higher at the inboard part of the wing, so the stall starts there, as you mentioned. But, you can still get effective stall warning with a stall vane on the outboard wing, as there is a repeatable relationship between the angle of attack on the outer and inner wings. In any case, the chordwise location (or the distance forward of the leading edge top skin intersection) will probably need to be adjusted via a series of iterative flight tests to get good results. If someone else has done the flight testing and has a location that works, go with it. Otherwise, expect to make some adjustments, no matter where you put it. Kevin Horton RV-8 (wings 85% done) Ottawa, Canada http://www.cyberus.ca/~khorton/rv8.html http://www.cyberus.ca/~khorton/nojpi.html - No JPI stuff in my aircraft! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 11, 1999
From: Brian Lloyd <brian(at)lloyd.com>
Subject: Re: Lift Reserve Indicator
>Mr. Lloyd, > >We are not hiding anything or intentionally misrepresenting anything. The >LRI has has performed excellently for hundreds and hundreds of pilots all >over the world for hundreds and hundreds of thousands of hours on just >about all types of aircraft. And I agreed with that in my post. >Cessna tested the LRI and it did indicate a slight deviation to the >conservative value with flaps. It was minor. When did Cessna, or Embry >Riddle, or Wichita State, or Nasa, or the Naval Post Graduate Academy at >Monterey test the Proprietary system? Please let me know if the system has >ever been tested by anyone anywhere. It took me some time to find the source of the research from which the PSS AoA was derived. I finally did and it is clearly based on valid physical properties as is the LRI. That it has or has not been tested by NASA, et al, doesn't mean that it is any less functional. Let me turn this around; if Cessna, Embry Riddle, and NASA have tested the LRI and proved its usefulness, why don't they install the LRI in all their airplanes? I suppose someone could use that datum to claim that, after extensive testing, these organizations did not feel that the instrument added sufficiently to the safety of flight to justify the cost of installation. But that would be just as bogus a claim. I agree that AoA information is extremely useful regardless of whether it comes from a LRI, a PSS AoA indicator, a vane-type AoA indicator, or any other indicator that reliably synthesizes AoA information for the pilot. >The fact is Proprietary Software 'attacks' us at every opportunity. Please >don't place these guys in heaven yet. Have we done something to offend you? Well, I haven't seen their attacks anywhere. I see your attacks on them regularly on the RV-list. When people ask questions about how the LRI works they generally get no answer or they get mumbo jumbo. They don't get solid information about how the LRI works and what its limitations are. If you want to disseminate good information, please answer the following questions: 1. What effect do gear and flap deployment have on the accuracy of the LRI? 2. If there is an effect, how great it is and in what direction? 3. Are the LRI indications accurate and consistent at G loadings significantly greater than 1 G?


October 03, 1999 - October 11, 1999

RV-Archive.digest.vol-hb