RV-Archive.digest.vol-ji

September 21, 2000 - September 27, 2000



      > writes:
      > > 
      > > While we are on the subject of transponders, how about the King 
      > > KT76C?
      > > Factory overhauled units with tray and install kit for $1195 from 
      > > Chief in
      > > Oregon - no sales tax?
      > > 
      > > These are, I have heard, all digital and without the expensive 
      > > cavity to
      > > fail.   Often, with digital devices, overhauled or refurbished means 
      > > they
      > > replaced the circuit board completely.
      > > 
      > > Which TXP is the best deal?
      > > 
      > > Hal Kempthorne
      > > RV6a N7HK
      > > 
      > > 
      > > > Replacement cavities are pretty expensive so you if the signal 
      > > strength
      > > > is not high you're probably better off buying a Garmin
      > > > transponder...they're only about $1200 and change
      > > 
      > > 
      > > 
      > > 
      > > 
      > > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Phillips" <mphill(at)fgi.net>
Subject: rv6 empennage kit
Date: Sep 21, 2000
For Sale, RV6 empennage kit (older style) construction complete other than some minor finish work on tips. Excellent workmanship. Includes preview manuals. reason for selling,i obtained wing and tail kit from other seller. Reply on or off list. mphill(at)fgi.net 217-566-2500 Mark E.Phillips Williamsville,Illinois ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Greg Tanner" <gtanner(at)bendcable.com>
Subject: Narco AT50A
Date: Sep 21, 2000
Anybody have any opinions on the UPS SL-60 GPS/COM? Greg Tanner RV-9A -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Cole, Ed Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 10:53 AM Subject: RE: RV-List: Narco AT50A Stark Avionics has a new in the box Garmin GTX-327 Digital Transponder for $1220. Will work with ACK blind encoder.( $165) I wouldn't buy used gear when the price is so close to new. Ed Cole RV6A Finish Kit > -----Original Message----- > From: Don Jordan [SMTP:dons6a(at)juno.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 8:33 AM > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV-List: Narco AT50A > > > I got a used unit from ASOD with an encoder for $700.00. then it cost > $165.50 to fix it & found the encoder was trash. Then the new encoder was > $160.00. I am at $1025.50 now & I have a used unit. > > the used C I think is a good deal.With $160.00 you would have $1355, but > it has more whistles & it does empress the girls. > > Question: Do I have to certifiy for the 24 months when I get all this > stuuff up & running? Of course. > > If I bought new, would I have to have it certified? > > Don Jordan -- 6A finish -- Arlington, Tx -- dons6a(at)juno.com > ********************************************** > writes: > > > > While we are on the subject of transponders, how about the King > > KT76C? > > Factory overhauled units with tray and install kit for $1195 from > > Chief in > > Oregon - no sales tax? > > > > These are, I have heard, all digital and without the expensive > > cavity to > > fail. Often, with digital devices, overhauled or refurbished means > > they > > replaced the circuit board completely. > > > > Which TXP is the best deal? > > > > Hal Kempthorne > > RV6a N7HK > > > > > > > Replacement cavities are pretty expensive so you if the signal > > strength > > > is not high you're probably better off buying a Garmin > > > transponder...they're only about $1200 and change > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: Phonetic Alphabet
Date: Sep 21, 2000
From the AIM... http://www.faa.gov/ATPubs/AIM/Preface/tbl422.gif Cy Galley - Editor, B-C Contact! (Click here to visit our Club site at http://www.bellanca-championclub.com) ----- Original Message ----- From: <cecilth(at)juno.com> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 11:46 AM Subject: RV-List: Phonetic Alphabet > > Any one know how to get a copy og the Phonetic Alphabet? > > Cecil Hatfield > Thousand Oaks California > RV6A > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Parsons" <dap(at)DParsons.com>
Subject: Narco AT50A
Date: Sep 21, 2000
Here is a website that has an interesting review about the whole UPS stack, including the SL-60 GPS/COM. http://www.chiefaircraft.com/Avionics/MfgAI/ApolloComparison.html Don Parsons -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Greg Tanner Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 1:35 PM Subject: RE: RV-List: Narco AT50A Anybody have any opinions on the UPS SL-60 GPS/COM? Greg Tanner RV-9A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "marcel de ruiter" <marcelderuiter(at)email.msn.com>
Subject: Re: Remove blue markings newer skins
Date: Sep 21, 2000
"marcel de ruiter" MEK does the job ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 21, 2000
Subject: Re: Phonetic Alphabet
From: cecilth(at)juno.com
Won, yesterday I spent an hour looking for my Airmans Manual. An hour and a half looking on the Internet, my dictionary, and the archives. Today I ask the question, and in 15 minutes, get 9 replys. Thanks guys, What a resource this is. Cecil Hatfield writes: > > alfa bravo charlie delta echo foxtrot golf hotel india juliett kilo > lima > mike november oscar papa quebec romeo sierra tango uniform victor > whiskey xray yankee zulu > > cecilth(at)juno.com wrote: > > > > > > Any one know how to get a copy og the Phonetic Alphabet? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 21, 2000
From: RV6160hp(at)AOL.COM
Subject: Time in RV6 with CFI at OSWEGO FORUM
FEW OPENINGS left FOR MIKE SEAGER Training in RV at KFZY To reply e-mail John directly to address: John.Balbierer(at)nysyra.ang.af.mil Openings left for Sunday, 1 October: 0800, 0930, 1300. 1st come 1st serve................. 6th Annual Northeast RV Forum September 30 - October 1, 2000 Oswego County Airport Fulton NY KFZY Just a reminder on the RV-List inviting people to the RV-Forum and Fly-in. Link our web site: http://www.web-flight.com/486/eaarvforum.htm <http://www.web-flight.com/486/eaarvforum.htm> Please pre-registered so our hand outs and food counts are more accurate. As in the past got lots of things planned. Hope to see you there Respectfully David McManmon ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "kempthornes" <kempthornes(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Simple Green - was Remove blue markings newer skins
Date: Oct 22, 2000
> See http://www.simplegreen.com/pdf/aircraft.pdf for their official word on it for aircraft. Great report. I suspect that some areas may have water that is more corrosive! Along the coasts, salt water often 'intrudes' into wells. This stuff is very effective so it is needed unless there is something better and less corrosive - that is, what can we compare it to? Many cleaners are corrosive to some extent. Who will test the alternatives? If the cleaner gets between two layers of 2024T3 at a skin joint and remains there for extended periods, especially in damp conditions, corrosion might develop. I don't think there will be corrosion if it is dry so flying after cleaning and rinsing and keeping the airplane as dry as possible might be good. Keeping the paint sound at joints be good too. Hal Kempthorne RV6a N7HK ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jim_Andrews(at)tivoli.com
Date: Sep 21, 2000
Subject: Blind rivet decapitation
What's the best way to trim off that extra bit of steel that sometimes protrudes from a blind rivet? I have several of these around the forward part of the canopy that I can't easily brush over with sand paper and a drimel tool accident would ruin my day ( not to mention my canopy ). - Jim Andrews RV-8A ( windscreen fun ) O-360 Sensenich N89JA reserved ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Weaver" <bweaver1(at)twcny.rr.com>
Subject: RV-9 availability
Date: Sep 21, 2000
I've heard rumors that Van's is going to offer a RV-9 in addition to the RV-9A? Can anyone confirm? Brian Weaver Soon to be builder ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Phillips" <mphill(at)fgi.net>
Subject: Re: rv6 empennage kit
Date: Sep 21, 2000
This is the punched version ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Phillips" <mphill(at)fgi.net> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 1:01 PM Subject: RV-List: rv6 empennage kit > > For Sale, RV6 empennage kit (older style) construction complete other than > some minor finish work on tips. Excellent workmanship. Includes preview > manuals. reason for selling,i obtained wing and tail kit from other seller. > Reply on or off list. > mphill(at)fgi.net > 217-566-2500 > Mark E.Phillips > Williamsville,Illinois > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 21, 2000
From: "jah" <jah(at)abraxis.com>
Subject: Re: RV-8 cabin cover question...
I think this is included in the 8A kit. You might call Van's and ask. I remember seeing it on one of the 8A plans pages. -Jeff RV-8 Finish Kit ( Wheel Pants ) Atlanta, GA ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: Bbrut55(at)AOL.COM Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 12:08:30 EDT > >ITS A CUSTOM PANEL YOU CAN MAKE OUT OF SCRAP ALUM. > >BILL >RV-8 WIRING > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: KBoatri144(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 21, 2000
Subject: Re: Blind rivet decapitation
In a message dated 9/21/00 5:35:21 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Jim_Andrews(at)tivoli.com writes: > What's the best way to trim off that extra bit of steel that sometimes > protrudes > from a blind rivet? I have several of these around the forward part of the > canopy that I can't easily brush over with sand paper and a drimel tool > accident > would ruin my day ( not to mention my canopy ). > > - Jim Andrews > RV-8A ( windscreen fun ) > O-360 Sensenich > N89JA reserved Jim, I'd suggest taking a centerpunch or some other pointy implement and pushing them back into the hole. If you've got an automatic centerpunch, be careful that you don't push so hard that the spring loaded feature kicks in. Kyle Boatright - Kennesaw, GA RV-6 Slider, O-320/Aymar-Demuth ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John" <fasching(at)amigo.net>
Subject: Weight and Balance
Date: Sep 21, 2000
I have done two W&B's on my RV6A....once upon completion, again after painting it. It scares the begeebers out of me to jack up high enough to get it into a flight level attitude. I plan to add some stuff to the plane soon and would again need to do a W&B....what clever methods have you used to avoid getting the mains so high that a slip off the pile of timbers (or whatever) would cause damage? I thought of putting the mains on scales on the edge of the taxiway, and digging a trench into the dirt just off the blacktop to run the nose wheel into and up on another scale so that nothing is high enough to endanger me or the plane. Ideas? RV6A Flying Salida, CO ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Phillips" <mphill(at)fgi.net>
Subject: duckworth lights
Date: Sep 21, 2000
The time has come to put the lights in the leading edge,since i dont have it riveted to the spar yet. I must say that I'm pretty nervous cutting on a perfectly good leading edge.Anybody got any pointers???? From the airplane factory in Williamsville ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Persyk" <dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Blind rivet decapitation
Date: Sep 21, 2000
-----Original Message----- From: Jim_Andrews(at)tivoli.com <Jim_Andrews(at)tivoli.com> Date: Thursday, September 21, 2000 4:07 PM Subject: RV-List: Blind rivet decapitation > > >What's the best way to trim off that extra bit of steel that sometimes protrudes >from a blind rivet? I have several of these around the forward part of the >canopy that I can't easily brush over with sand paper and a drimel tool accident >would ruin my day ( not to mention my canopy ). > >- Jim Andrews >RV-8A ( windscreen fun ) >O-360 Sensenich >N89JA reserved > There are two cases of protruding material: Case 1) The body of the rivet has been extruded into the nosepiece of the rivet puller because the nosepiece hole is larger than the mandrel diameter. Every pop rivet puller, manual and pneumatic, that I have ever seen has this problem. This case is very difficult to fix. Avoid this situation by either a) fashioning a new nosepiece with a tight fit to the mandrel, or b) using a small thin sheet piece, with the proper tight hole, spaced between nosepiece and rivet when pulling. Case 2) The mandrel breaks off above the head of the rivet. Grind a flat end on a pulled mandrel and use it as a drift punch to drift the protruding mandrel down beneath the head surface. Dennis Persyk 6A N600DP O360A1A/Hartzell Hampshire, IL C38 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Robertson" <mrobert569(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: test - disregard
Date: Sep 21, 2000
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Persyk" <dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Weight and Balance
Date: Sep 21, 2000
-----Original Message----- From: John <fasching(at)amigo.net> Date: Thursday, September 21, 2000 6:08 PM Subject: RV-List: Weight and Balance > >I have done two W&B's on my RV6A....once upon completion, again after >painting it. It scares the begeebers out of me to jack up high enough to >get it into a flight level attitude. > >I plan to add some stuff to the plane soon and would again need to do a >W&B....what clever methods have you used to avoid getting the mains so high >that a slip off the pile of timbers (or whatever) would cause damage? > >I thought of putting the mains on scales on the edge of the taxiway, and >digging a trench into the dirt just off the blacktop to run the nose wheel >into and up on another scale so that nothing is high enough to endanger me >or the plane. > >Ideas? > >RV6A Flying >Salida, CO > I would suggest you weight the added parts on a small balance, measure their arms, and calculate the new weight and cg from the part weights and arms. If you can estimate the arms to within 1/10 inch, you will find the calculational method is far more accurate than weighing the plane. This is because even certified aircraft scales cannot determine small weight differences to the precision and accuracy of a small balance. I will be facing this very problem in a week or so and I have hopes of working out the math so that I can weigh the plane at any attitude and compute the cg for level attitude. I just now measured the longerons of my 6A and they are 4.3 degrees off horizontal, nose high. If anyone has worked out the math, including propagation of errors, I'd appreciate your inputs. Leveling is very important to establish the cg accurately. If we assume the cg is 40 inches above ground (just a guess on my part), an error of 1 degree in leveling will introduce an error in cg location of 40 inches x tangent (1 degree) = 0.7 inches -- that's a lot in terms of the narrow envelope of an RV! Dennis Persyk 6A N600DP O360A1A/Hartzell 0.0 hours Hampshire, IL C38 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 21, 2000
From: "Owens, Laird" <Owens(at)aerovironment.com>
Subject: Blind rivet-tip
Hi Jim and all, Someone mentioned using a centerpunch to knock the mandrel back in. Personally I wouldn't do that. You could loosen the rivet or knock the mandrel completely out. Remember that the mandrel takes the shear load of the rivet. For your problem I'd CAREFULLY use a carbide bit to grind it down. During the construction of my RV, I found a way to prevent breaking the mandrel off above the rivet head. When it started happening to me, I wondered why. After a little investigation, I found the tip of the rivet puller had a hole in it that was about .100, while the mandrel diameter is .076. Apparently the oversize hole allows for a misalignment while your pulling the rivet. (At least I think that's what is happening). My solution was to use a small (1/2"x1/2") piece of .063 steel with a .080 hole drilled in it. I use this between the rivet head and the puller on each rivet. I haven't had one mandrel break above the rivet since I've started using that technique. Hope it helps somebody. Laird Owens RV-6, N515L, 100 hrs O-360, Sensenich (83) Simi Valley, SoCal In a message dated 9/21/00 5:35:21 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Jim_Andrews(at)tivoli.com writes: > What's the best way to trim off that extra bit of steel that sometimes > protrudes > from a blind rivet? I have several of these around the forward part of the > canopy that I can't easily brush over with sand paper and a drimel tool > accident > would ruin my day ( not to mention my canopy ). > > - Jim Andrews > RV-8A ( windscreen fun ) > O-360 Sensenich > N89JA reserved ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "rvpilot" <rvpilot(at)coollink.net>
Subject:
Date: Sep 20, 2000
Boyd, The springs are necessary in order to account for the different amount of travel each side makes when the rudder is deflected fully. Try it without the springs and you will find that the rudder will bind before it hits the stop(unless you have a WHOLE lot of slack in the chains) There are two ways around this. You could go with a single push-pull rod as some Pitts drivers have done. I dont favor this method since then you don't have any slack in the system . A little slack is desirable to prevent over sensitivity. Or, you could redesign the rudder horn (as I did on my last two RV's) so that the attach point for the steering cables is in line with the hinge axis of the rudder. This way the differential movement is eliminated. Works great for me. Bill RV-8 N48WD ----- Original Message ----- From: <bcbraem(at)home.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 3:29 PM Subject: RV-List: speed mods > > All-- > > Bumped into Sam James at a breakfast fly-in a while back and he invited ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Christie" <billc(at)dancris.com>
Subject: Re: duckworth lights
Date: Sep 21, 2000
Mark, I put these in each wingtip using a dremel tool and a small cutoff wheel about 1" in diameter. I carefully placed the paper with the cutout on the leading edge and marked it off with a sharpie. I must have rechecked the location a dozen times! I then very carefully cut it out inside the line using minimal pressure and just cutting in a little at a time. I used both hands braced against the skin to keep it from binding and jerking to one side. It took a while, but came out amazingly well. I then filed it to the line and dressed it with a small scotchbrite wheel in a battery powered drill. I used his technique with the packing tape to hold the lens in place to drill the mounting holes. Came out fine. Bill Christie, RV8A fuselage ----- Original Message ----- From: Mark Phillips <mphill(at)fgi.net> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 4:13 PM Subject: RV-List: duckworth lights > > The time has come to put the lights in the leading edge,since i dont have it > riveted to the spar yet. I must say that I'm pretty nervous cutting on a > perfectly good leading edge.Anybody got any pointers???? > > >From the airplane factory in Williamsville > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "bobdz" <bobdz(at)email.msn.com>
Subject: Re: Phonetic Alphabet
Date: Sep 21, 2000
It's in FAR/AIM. > > Any one know how to get a copy og the Phonetic Alphabet? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 21, 2000
From: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv(at)teleport.com>
Subject: Re: speed mods
Finn Lassen wrote: > > > You don't need the tail springs if the distance from the rudder horn holes to > the tail wheel "horn" holes remains constant throughout the full range of rudder > movement. > > Try blocking up the tail so the tail wheel can move freely. Temporarily replace > the chains and springs with pieces of string. Can you move the rudder throughout > it's full range without it being stopped by the string (or the string being > stretched)? If so, you can skip the springs. > > Finn > The spring are also on to help reduce the stress on the rudder simply from taxiing and turning corners. I have a picture on my web site of some streamed lined rudder spring covers that are built my Butch Malani of Medford, Oregon. Also notice the way he has streamlined his rudder horns. http://www.teleport.com/~jsflyrv/BMalani1.jpg http://www.teleport.com/~jsflyrv/Bmalani2.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 21, 2000
From: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv(at)teleport.com>
Subject: Re: Blind rivet-tip
"Owens, Laird" wrote: > > > Hi Jim and all, > > Someone mentioned using a centerpunch to knock the mandrel back in. Personally I wouldn't do that. You could loosen the rivet or knock the mandrel completely out. Remember that the mandrel takes the shear load of the rivet. For your problem I'd CAREFULLY use a carbide bit to grind it down. > > During the construction of my RV, I found a way to prevent breaking the mandrel off above the rivet head. When it started happening to me, I wondered why. After a little investigation, I found the tip of the rivet puller had a hole in it that was about .100, while the mandrel diameter is .076. Apparently the oversize hole allows for a misalignment while your pulling the rivet. (At least I think that's what is happening). > > My solution was to use a small (1/2"x1/2") piece of .063 steel with a .080 hole drilled in it. I use this between the rivet head and the puller on each rivet. > > I haven't had one mandrel break above the rivet since I've started using that technique. > > Hope it helps somebody. > > Laird Owens RV-6, N515L, 100 hrs > O-360, Sensenich (83) > Simi Valley, SoCal > > In a message dated 9/21/00 5:35:21 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > Jim_Andrews(at)tivoli.com writes: > > > What's the best way to trim off that extra bit of steel that sometimes > > protrudes > > from a blind rivet? I have several of these around the forward part of the > > canopy that I can't easily brush over with sand paper and a drimel tool > > accident > > would ruin my day ( not to mention my canopy ). > > > > - Jim Andrews > > RV-8A ( windscreen fun ) > > O-360 Sensenich > > N89JA reserved > Hi Laird, got to disagree with you on this one, I don't think the mandrel is considered part of the strength of a blind rivet. these mandrels are fairly loose fit inside of the rivet and if a rivet shifts enough to need the strength of the mandrel I think there are other problems. I have built a complete airplane out of "pop" rivets and punched out most of the mandrels just to keep them from falling out and rattling around the interior of the airplane. JSpringer ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 21, 2000
Subject: Re: Time in RV6 with CFI at OSWEGO FORUM
From: Michael D Hilger <rvsixer(at)juno.com>
I am scheduled to fly with Mike on Oct 6 at Lebanon, TN. He told me he only takes the -6 on the road cuz if you can handle a -6, a -6A is no problem. Mike Hilger RV-6, N207AM Inver Grove Hgts, MN Hopefully flying in Oct ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 21, 2000
From: Chris Sheehan <ctsheehan(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Blind rivet-tip
I vaguely recall Chris Heintz speaking at this year's Sun n Fun saying that since you don't know for sure where the mandrel will break you can't count on it contributing to the shear strength (but don't quote me - my brain was getting full by this point!) You can read more at http://www.zenithair.com/kit-data/ht-87-1.html Chris Sheehan Jerry Springer wrote: > > > "Owens, Laird" wrote: > > > > > > Hi Jim and all, > > > > Someone mentioned using a centerpunch to knock the mandrel back in. Personally I wouldn't do that. You could loosen the rivet or knock the mandrel completely out. Remember that the mandrel takes the shear load of the rivet. For your problem I'd CAREFULLY use a carbide bit to grind it down. > > > > During the construction of my RV, I found a way to prevent breaking the mandrel off above the rivet head. When it started happening to me, I wondered why. After a little investigation, I found the tip of the rivet puller had a hole in it that was about .100, while the mandrel diameter is .076. Apparently the oversize hole allows for a misalignment while your pulling the rivet. (At least I think that's what is happening). > > > > My solution was to use a small (1/2"x1/2") piece of .063 steel with a .080 hole drilled in it. I use this between the rivet head and the puller on each rivet. > > > > I haven't had one mandrel break above the rivet since I've started using that technique. > > > > Hope it helps somebody. > > > > Laird Owens RV-6, N515L, 100 hrs > > O-360, Sensenich (83) > > Simi Valley, SoCal > > > > In a message dated 9/21/00 5:35:21 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > > Jim_Andrews(at)tivoli.com writes: > > > > > What's the best way to trim off that extra bit of steel that sometimes > > > protrudes > > > from a blind rivet? I have several of these around the forward part of the > > > canopy that I can't easily brush over with sand paper and a drimel tool > > > accident > > > would ruin my day ( not to mention my canopy ). > > > > > > - Jim Andrews > > > RV-8A ( windscreen fun ) > > > O-360 Sensenich > > > N89JA reserved > > > Hi Laird, got to disagree with you on this one, I don't think > the mandrel is considered part of the strength of a blind rivet. > these mandrels are fairly loose fit inside of the rivet and if > a rivet shifts enough to need the strength of the mandrel I think > there are other problems. > I have built a complete airplane out of "pop" rivets and punched > out most of the mandrels just to keep them from falling out and > rattling around the interior of the airplane. > > JSpringer > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
"John"
Subject: Re: Weight and Balance
Date: Sep 21, 2000
You have to do all weighting inside a closed hangar as air currents will change the apparent weights. Remember airfoils generate lift!!! Cy Galley - Editor, B-C Contact! (Click here to visit our Club site at http://www.bellanca-championclub.com) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dennis Persyk" <dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 6:46 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Weight and Balance > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John <fasching(at)amigo.net> > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Thursday, September 21, 2000 6:08 PM > Subject: RV-List: Weight and Balance > > > > > >I have done two W&B's on my RV6A....once upon completion, again after > >painting it. It scares the begeebers out of me to jack up high enough to > >get it into a flight level attitude. > > > >I plan to add some stuff to the plane soon and would again need to do a > >W&B....what clever methods have you used to avoid getting the mains so high > >that a slip off the pile of timbers (or whatever) would cause damage? > > > >I thought of putting the mains on scales on the edge of the taxiway, and > >digging a trench into the dirt just off the blacktop to run the nose wheel > >into and up on another scale so that nothing is high enough to endanger me > >or the plane. > > > >Ideas? > > > >RV6A Flying > >Salida, CO > > > I would suggest you weight the added parts on a small balance, measure their > arms, and calculate the new weight and cg from the part weights and arms. > If you can estimate the arms to within 1/10 inch, you will find the > calculational method is far more accurate than weighing the plane. This is > because even certified aircraft scales cannot determine small weight > differences to the precision and accuracy of a small balance. > > I will be facing this very problem in a week or so and I have hopes of > working out the math so that I can weigh the plane at any attitude and > compute the cg for level attitude. I just now measured the longerons of my > 6A and they are 4.3 degrees off horizontal, nose high. If anyone has worked > out the math, including propagation of errors, I'd appreciate your inputs. > > Leveling is very important to establish the cg accurately. If we assume the > cg is 40 inches above ground (just a guess on my part), an error of 1 degree > in leveling will introduce an error in cg location of 40 inches x tangent > (1 degree) = 0.7 inches -- that's a lot in terms of the narrow envelope of > an RV! > > Dennis Persyk 6A N600DP O360A1A/Hartzell 0.0 hours > Hampshire, IL C38 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 21, 2000
From: Warren Gretz <warrengretz(at)gretzaero.com>
list-aerobatic , list-avionics , list-ez , list-glasair , list-lancair , list-rocket
Subject: Pitot tube SPECIAL price
Hello to the list, I have just received a price increase from the manufacture of the AN5814 heated pitot tube. This is the heated pitot tube with the static source in the pitot tube. I have a good supply of this pitot tube that I will sell at the old (before price increase) price. The old price is $199, this includes shipping in the US. After my current supply is gone, I must increase my price to $206 which will also include shipping in the US. This will be on a first come first serve basis. Check out my website for descriptions of this product and also my heated pitot tube mounting bracket kits. You can purchase using your VISA or MASTER CARD using my online order form, or call me in the evenings or on weekends. My website address is: http://www.gretzaero.com Warren Gretz Gretz Aero 303-770-3811 evenings and weekends (you may also leave a message other times) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 21, 2000
Subject: Re: duckworth lights
From: Michael D Hilger <rvsixer(at)juno.com>
I put mine in after the wings were complete except for tips. I used a unibit at the corners, then a cutoff wheel, then filed to the line. Before I started, I kinda wished I'd gotten the RMD lights, but the Duckworks lights came out great. Get to it! Mike Hilger RV-6, N207AM Almost done... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ted French" <ted_french(at)canada.com>
Subject: Re: Slider and Glue
Date: Sep 21, 2000
I used urethane to glue the windshield in. Works very well, but I hope to God I don't ever have to remove it. Ted ----- Original Message ----- From: "The Stribling's" <bbattery(at)bendcable.com> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 6:56 AM Subject: RV-List: Slider and Glue > > I have been reading from the list for the last year and just about all my > questions get answered before I do that task by others that ask my > questions, but I am waiting for the finishing kit and was wondering if any > one has used urathane like they glue windshields in cars with for the canopy > instead of drilling the holes that would crack the canopy. > > Thanks Ken S. ,Finishing kit next week, first project --- canopy --- > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Blomgren" <jackanet(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Blind Rivet Tools (Was Blind Rivet Tip)
Date: Sep 22, 2000
New Builders, Suggest you check out any new tool for operation, pulling several rivets in test holes, before you use on valued components. My first "Made in China" knock off tool occasionally clipped mandrels leaving some protruding, and even before having fully set the rivet. The problem- the tool's gripping serrations. The nearmost serrations to rivet head were too sharp, too long, and gripping hardest, clipped off rather than just pulled the mandrel. (You can also check for such "cheep" tool defect by inspecting a pulled mandrel's grip marks.) Good Building, Jack Blomgren (The Skink Works) Red Wing, MN -8 Wings, N8VZ Reserved ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ferdfly(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 21, 2000
Subject: Re: Tail wheel springs
In a message dated 9/21/00 5:20:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time, rvpilot(at)coollink.net writes: << he springs are necessary in order to account for the different amount of travel each side makes when the rudder is deflected fully. Try it without the springs and you will find that the rudder will bind before it hits the stop(unless you have a WHOLE lot of slack in the chains) There are two ways around this. You could go with a single push-pull rod as some Pitts drivers have done. I dont favor this method since then you don't have any slack in the system . A little slack is desirable to prevent over sensitivity. Or, you could redesign the rudder horn (as I did on my last two RV's) so that the attach point for the steering cables is in line with the hinge axis of the rudder. This way the differential movement is eliminated. Works great for me . >> Guys, I think you need those tail wheel springs in a crosswind landing where you got a bunch of rudder in to hold the plane straight and you`re about to set it down with the tail wheel cocked over to one side, might break sonething. Fred LaForge RV-4 EAA Tech C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "RV-8.com-RL" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: RV-9 availability
Date: Sep 21, 2000
>>I've heard rumors that Van's is going to offer a RV-9 in addition to the RV-9A?<< I heard just the opposite, and for the following reason: it's not simply a matter of adding main gear to the engine mount as is done on the -6. To create a taildragger -9 they would need to design/engineer gear towers something like what the -8 has, and that would be a significant undertaking. That said, Van's has always responded to customer demand in the long run. If the the 9A keeps selling like it has already started to (40 starts during August alone), and they keep hearing demand for a taildragger, them I'm sure they will respond, but it won't be soon. Hey, they gotta get the 4 place going first! Randy Lervold RV-8, #80500, cowling www.rv-8.com Home Wing VAF ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Greg Tanner" <gtanner(at)bendcable.com>
Subject: RV-9 availability
Date: Sep 21, 2000
Since we're talking about the 9 here---does anybody on the list live pretty close to Van's? I would like to find somebody that would be able to pick up a kit during the week so I could come over from Cental Or on the weekend and get it. I talked to vans and they said no way would anyone be around on a saturday for a pickup. Greg Tanner -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of RV-8.com-RL Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 7:09 PM Subject: RE: RV-List: RV-9 availability >>I've heard rumors that Van's is going to offer a RV-9 in addition to the RV-9A?<< I heard just the opposite, and for the following reason: it's not simply a matter of adding main gear to the engine mount as is done on the -6. To create a taildragger -9 they would need to design/engineer gear towers something like what the -8 has, and that would be a significant undertaking. That said, Van's has always responded to customer demand in the long run. If the the 9A keeps selling like it has already started to (40 starts during August alone), and they keep hearing demand for a taildragger, them I'm sure they will respond, but it won't be soon. Hey, they gotta get the 4 place going first! Randy Lervold RV-8, #80500, cowling www.rv-8.com Home Wing VAF ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 21, 2000
From: "J. Davis" <jd(at)lri.sjhc.london.on.ca>
Subject: Re: Phonetic Alphabet
Here's one for when you get bored with the old alfa-bravo-charlie: A Are N Nine B Bee O Owe C Cite P Pseudonym D Double-U Q Queue E Eye R Rap F Five S Sea G Genre T Tsunami H Hoe U Understand? I I V Vie J Junta W Why K Knot X Xylophone L Lye Y You M Me Z Zero Regards, J. | J. Davis, M.Sc. (comp_sci) | email: jd(at)uwo.ca | | SysMgr, research programmer | voice: (519) 646 6100 x64166 | | Lawson Research Institute | fax: (519) 646 6135 | | London, Ontario | lriweb.sjhc.london.on.ca/~jd | I got food poisoning today. I don't know when I'll use it. --- Steven Wright On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, bobdz wrote: > > It's in FAR/AIM. > > > > Any one know how to get a copy og the Phonetic Alphabet? > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 21, 2000
From: gert <gert(at)execpc.com>
Subject: RV8A: F811 and F812 ribs
Hi folks I am having a hard time getting my F 811 and F 812 bulkheads to lay flat back to back. The problem as I see it are the puckered upwards areas around the places where the main longerons go. These areas were formed when the bulkhead was formed and now prevent the two bulkheads to be back to back. I don't know about the F 812 bulkheads but the bars which will hold the tail to the F 811 bulkheads are now not perpendicular. So, ye wise men who have gone before me, how have ye flattended the F-811 bulkheads enough to have them flat back to back ?? Thanks Gert -- Pursuant to US Code, Title 47, Chapter 5, Subchapter II, '227, any and all nonsolicited commercial E-mail sent to this address is subject to a download and archival fee in the amount of $500 US. E-mailing denotes acceptance of these terms. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 21, 2000
From: old ogre <jollyd(at)teleport.com>
Subject: Re: RV-9 availability
I live right across the street from vans..if that would help...503-678-3343...jolly in aurora, or. Greg Tanner wrote: > > Since we're talking about the 9 here---does anybody on the list live pretty > close to Van's? I would like to find somebody that would be able to pick up > a kit during the week so I could come over from Cental Or on the weekend and > get it. I talked to vans and they said no way would anyone be around on a > saturday for a pickup. > > Greg Tanner > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of RV-8.com-RL > Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 7:09 PM > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com; Brian Weaver > Subject: RE: RV-List: RV-9 availability > > > >>I've heard rumors that Van's is going to offer a RV-9 in addition to the > RV-9A?<< > > I heard just the opposite, and for the following reason: it's not simply a > matter of adding main gear to the engine mount as is done on the -6. To > create a taildragger -9 they would need to design/engineer gear towers > something like what the -8 has, and that would be a significant undertaking. > > That said, Van's has always responded to customer demand in the long run. If > the the 9A keeps selling like it has already started to (40 starts during > August alone), and they keep hearing demand for a taildragger, them I'm sure > they will respond, but it won't be soon. Hey, they gotta get the 4 place > going first! > > Randy Lervold > RV-8, #80500, cowling > www.rv-8.com > Home Wing VAF > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2000
From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)hiwaay.net>
Subject: notes from TVRVBG meeting
I just returned from our September meeting of the Tennessee Valley RV Builders Group. Some of you may get a kick out of seeing some incredible metal work that will eventually end up on an RV-6A: http://home.HiWAAY.net/~sbuc/tvrvbg/barn.htm Also, The TVRVBG is co-hosting a fly-in with the EAA Chapter 941 at DCU (Decatur, AL) on October 14th. We would LOVE to see a bunch of RVs arrive to impress the locals with what quality homebuilt aircraft are all about. Guest RV pilots will be treated to lunch, and a .25/gallon fuel discount will be offered. DCU is located just 16 miles from the world famous Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville, and anyone wearing a fly-in badge will get a $2 discount on admission. Transportation will be provided and rental cars are also available on the field. The local Country Inn and Suites is offering their $88 rooms for $55 to fly-in participants with transportation provided. This is a low key, laid back fly-in with hopefully great weather and lots of RV lies swapped. DCU is the home aerodrome for the Alabama Redneck Gang of "Westward Ho!" fame, and will be semi-staffed by the rabid members of the TVRVBG. More details will be forthcoming (as we figure them out) and you can visit the TVRVBG web site for current info and email links: http://home.HiWAAY.net/~sbuc/tvrvbg Hope to see you there! Sam Buchanan "The RV Journal" http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2000
From: Michael Hartmann <hartmann(at)sound.net>
Subject: AIM, Was: Phonetic Alphabet
> >Won, yesterday I spent an hour looking for my Airmans Manual. An hour and >a half looking on the Internet, my dictionary, and the archives. Today I >ask the question, and in 15 minutes, get 9 replys. No need to spend a lot of time looking for your copy of the manual, much easier to go online at: http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/AIM/index.htm Those who have been following the ATC/Advisories thread will find everything you ever wanted to know about the right way to get ATC service here too. That's why they call it the AIM, I guess. - Mike hartmann(at)sound.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2000
From: Jeff Point <jpoint(at)execpc.com>
Subject: Re: duckworth lights
I just did mine a few weeks ago with a dremel and 1 inch cutoff wheel. I ran the tool at max speed, and went verrrryyyy slowly. I was concerned about the wheel catching and creasing the skin, but this never happened, even in corners. I made a first rough cut 1/8 inch in from the pattern line, then went back and made it look nice. A little filing and a fair bit of elbow grease and emery cloth made it turn out very nicely. I stayed away from the 1 inch scotchbtite wheel (which I use extensively elsewhere) because this is a high visiblity item, and I wanted to look as perfect as I could make it, and it's too easy to slip and take too much off with the scotchbrite wheel. Jeff Point -6 wings Milwaukee, WI ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randall Henderson" <randallh(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Prop tip paint?
Date: Sep 21, 2000
> What about all of those polished aluminum props? I see a lot of those > unpainted. > Randall ??? While my prop is polished, my tips are painted with a detail that matches the paint. I always thought it was required to do something on the tips but from other postings I guess it isn't except for pushers. At any rate I kind of like the look better with something on the tips. As for balance, the guy that painted my plane is the one who did the paint removal and polishing of the prop. He'd done a number of them before and really seems to have it down to a science. He told me he's careful to not un-balance the thing. The blades are fairly rough under the paint so they had to be wet sanded before polishing. I don't know how well he can really tell how much he's taking off, but I had it balanced later just to be sure, and it turned out to be quite well balanced. They only were able to tweak it a teeny bit better, but it made me feel better just knowing. One thing though -- I happened to mention to a Hartzell rep at OSH that my prop was polished and he told me that voids the warranty. Hmph. Randall Henderson, RV-6 N6R (~150 hrs) Portland, OR http://www.edt.com/homewing ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Larygagnon(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 22, 2000
Subject: Re: Kuntzleman Electronics HOT BOX
I agree. I have one in my Kitfox and while excellent for that Rotax powered plane it does not have the capacity or flexibility needed for the Lycoming. Larry Gagnon Model 4/912 N102LG RV6 Fuselage N6LG (reserved) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2000
From: Chris Browne <cebrowne(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: RV-6A QB Slider Project for Sale
I've had enough. I am just to anal and to slow, so I've decided to buy and fly and let the project go. My loss is your gain - a reasonable builder could be finished in 6 months, or less. Airframe is almost complete, its on the gear with the engine mounted, and 90% FWF. Includes VFR instruments. Located in Atlanta. Contact me offlist for details. Chris Browne cebrowne(at)earthlink.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jim_Andrews(at)tivoli.com
Date: Sep 22, 2000
Subject: Re: duckworth lights
Mark: Just one more success story to send you off in another direction :-) Mine is a quick build kit so my wings were completely done when I decided to install my lights. I just laid out the pattern and checked it five or six times, and then got someone else to check it for me ( no room for error here ) and whipped out the unibit and sheers and started cutting away. I was able to easily remove all the material within an eighth of an inch of my line. The rest I did with a two inch scotch bright wheel on a straight die grinder attachment. They turned out remarkably well. Not a scratch out side the lines and all the surfaces were practically polished by the scotch bright wheel. - Jim Andrews RV-8A ( windscreen fun ) O-360 Sensenich N89JA reserved ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Frazier, Vincent A" <VFrazier(at)usi.edu>
"'RV-List Digest Server'"
Subject: fixing canopy squeaks
Date: Sep 22, 2000
I used urethane to glue the windshield in. Works very well, but I hope to God I don't ever have to remove it. My first RV-4 canopy was built per plans. It squeaked and groaned terribly whenever it was moved. The next canopy was also built per plans except I put a thin bead of clear silicone caulk wherever the aluminum and the plexiglas touched. Do this immediately before pulling the pop rivets. I wiped off the excess immediately using water and/or IPA. The canopy never squeaked and seemed much more solid. Yeah, I can feel the flames already, but the silicone didn't corrode anything that I can see, and it's one less water leak to worry about. I suppose that you could use some sort of soft sticky tape to do the same thing. Check the automotive supply stores or Home Depot Aircraft Supply! I plan to do the same when I build the HRII canopy. The silicone was quick, cheap, worked well, and could be removed if needed. Vince in Indiana ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2000
From: Ken Balch <kbalch1(at)mediaone.net>
Subject: Cageable gyro?
I'm in the process of ordering my instruments & avionics and a question has arisen about attitude gyros. Simply put: Is the extra $400 for a cageable gyro money well spent? I'm planning on getting a Sigma-Tek with the 8 degree panel tilt. Would simple rolls, loops, half cubans, etc. damage a non-cageable gyro? -- Regards, Ken Balch Ashland, MA RV-8 #81125 N118KB (reserved) assorted endless cockpit stuff ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gardner, Douglas (GA01)" <douglas.gardner(at)honeywell.com>
Subject: RV-8 cabin cover question...
Date: Sep 22, 2000
"Gardner, Douglas (GA01)" The -8A does have these cabin covers, which I made the cutouts from the fuel level. However in order to avoid cutting into the longeron the dimensions are critical. If you want I can measure and report back, as I spent some time getting this right. After talking to other -8A builders I opted not to mount the fuel gauges down there due to the wiring complexity and the need to have those on the panel for scanning reasons. Doug Gardner 80717 -8A FWD back/Final assembly Palm Harbor Fla -----Original Message----- From: jah [mailto:jah(at)abraxis.com] Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 6:05 PM Bbrut55(at)AOL.COM Subject: Re: RV-List: RV-8 cabin cover question... I think this is included in the 8A kit. You might call Van's and ask. I remember seeing it on one of the 8A plans pages. -Jeff RV-8 Finish Kit ( Wheel Pants ) Atlanta, GA ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: Bbrut55(at)AOL.COM Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 12:08:30 EDT > >ITS A CUSTOM PANEL YOU CAN MAKE OUT OF SCRAP ALUM. > >BILL >RV-8 WIRING > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2000
From: Bill VonDane <bvondane(at)cso.atmel.com>
Subject: Wing-tip landing lights & wig-wag flasher
Hi All... I have the wig-wag flasher details posted that I was talking about the other day, along with the wing-tip landing light installation... Here a GOOD link this time :) http://vondane.com/rv8a/ideas/index.htm Bill VonDane, Colorado Springs, CO RV-8A, N8VD, Wings http://vondane.com/rv8a/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2000
From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: duckworth lights
Jeff Point wrote: > > > I just did mine a few weeks ago with a dremel and 1 inch cutoff wheel. I ran > the tool at max speed, and went verrrryyyy slowly. I was concerned about the > wheel catching and creasing the skin, but this never happened, even in corners. > I made a first rough cut 1/8 inch in from the pattern line, then went back and > made it look nice. A little filing and a fair bit of elbow grease and emery > cloth made it turn out very nicely. I stayed away from the 1 inch scotchbtite > wheel (which I use extensively elsewhere) because this is a high visiblity item, > and I wanted to look as perfect as I could make it, and it's too easy to slip > and take too much off with the scotchbrite wheel. Good advice. For those of you who are too nervous to install the Duckwork lights, just put that task aside for awhile. After you have built the canopy, installing the Duckwork lights will be NOTHING!! :-) The Duckworks are a lot less involved than the wing tip installation, and work very well. Sam Buchanan (RV-6 wig-wagged by two Duckworks and Gall's flasher) "The RV Journal" http;//home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Frazier, Vincent A" <VFrazier(at)usi.edu>
"'RV-List Digest Server'"
Subject: pop rivet protruding mandrels
Date: Sep 22, 2000
What are people doing with the MK-319-BS flush monel rivets? The mandrel seems loose enough to rattle around and drives out very easily. When I have a rivet mandrel sticking out I either hit it with the automatic center punch (preferred) or grind it down with the dremel if it's stubborn. As far as loose mandrels rattling around, well, they won't hurt anything but can easily be fixed. Go to the automotive paint store and buy a tube of the silver colored windshield sealant made by 3M, IIRC. Punch or grind down the mandrels as needed. Squirt a small dab into each pop rivet mandrel hole from the top. This will glue the mandrel in place. Wipe off the excess immediately with a solvent dampened paper towel. You'll be sorry if you don't 'cause the dried rubbery stuff won't go anywhere! You should have a nice looking filled rivet that requires no further attention... EVER. You can paint right over it or if you polish the plane nobody will notice the silver color. If anyone does notice, kick them square in the butt. Vince in Indiana ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JDaniel343(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 22, 2000
Subject: Re: Protective vinyl tubing??
According to 43.13 it is not acceptable to run wiring thru tubing. Conduit is OK of course. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Larry Hawkins <lhawkins(at)giant.com>
Subject: F442 mounting pad
Date: Sep 22, 2000
trying to build the F442 mount pads for my RV4. can anyone tell me how to bend that angle the 5 degrees that the plan calls for. lhawkins RV4 fuse Farmington nm ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2000
Subject: Re: test - disregard
From: Don Jordan <dons6a(at)juno.com>
10-4 On Thu, 21 Sep 2000 13:36:18 HST "Mike Robertson" writes: > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Cageable gyro?
Date: Sep 22, 2000
From: Larry Pardue <n5lp(at)carlsbad.net>
> > >I'm in the process of ordering my instruments & avionics and a question >has arisen about attitude gyros. Simply put: Is the extra $400 for a >cageable gyro money well spent? I'm planning on getting a Sigma-Tek >with the 8 degree panel tilt. > >Would simple rolls, loops, half cubans, etc. damage a non-cageable gyro? > >-- As for damage, there seems to be a difference of opinion on that. However, I believe that is the attitude indicator I have and the caging is momentary only. It is useful for more quickly errecting a tumbled gyro, but it is not possible to lock it into a caged position. Larry Pardue Carlsbad, NM RV-6 N441LP http://www.carlsbadnm.com/n5lp/index.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "<Eric.J.Henson(at)chase.com>
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 2.0.15) with SMTP id for" ; Fri, 22 Sep 2000 11:44:47.-0400(at)matronics.com
Date: Sep 22, 2000
Subject: Re: fixing canopy squeaks
22 Sep 2000 11:44:47.-0400(at)matronics.com Round these here parts lots of builders do a removable glass frame. Its held on on the bottom with rivnuts and then just prosealed on on top. If you ever have to remove the front frame just use a long blade between the canopy (which would be broken) and the frame and it will cut loose; eventually. Eric Henson S. Florida ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2000
From: joe wiza <jwiza1(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Slider and Glue
Using wax paper I fiber glassed a form around the lower front of the wind shield and a seperate one over the rollbar. Tapped the rollbar and screwed the fiber glass and windshield down about every 4" with stainless steel decorative washers. Used nuts and bolts on the leading bottom edge. Comes on and off easy and no leaks with a little outdoor clear window sealer. Joe RV6A 100hrs, back for the winter and flying again. For more info jwiza1(at)yahoo.com --- Ted French wrote: > > > I used urethane to glue the windshield in. Works > very well, but I hope to > God I don't ever have to remove it. > > Ted > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "The Stribling's" <bbattery(at)bendcable.com> > To: ; "Jim Bower" > > Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 6:56 AM > Subject: RV-List: Slider and Glue > > > > > > > I have been reading from the list for the last > year and just about all my > > questions get answered before I do that task by > others that ask my > > questions, but I am waiting for the finishing kit > and was wondering if any > > one has used urathane like they glue windshields > in cars with for the > canopy > > instead of drilling the holes that would crack the > canopy. > > > > Thanks Ken S. ,Finishing kit next week, first > project --- canopy --- > > > > > > > > through > > http://www.matronics.com/archives > http://www.matronics.com/emaillists > > Matronics! > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HCRV6(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 22, 2000
Subject: Re: duckworth lights
In a message dated 9/21/00 4:18:13 PM Pacific Daylight Time, mphill(at)fgi.net writes: << The time has come to put the lights in the leading edge,since i dont have it riveted to the spar yet. I must say that I'm pretty nervous cutting on a perfectly good leading edge.Anybody got any pointers???? >> When I did mine, also for Duckworks, I used my Unibit to cut the corners and a Dremel with a cutoff wheel in between. Always cut inside the final lines and use a smooth file and sandpaper to finish. Worked for me. Harry Crosby Pleasanton, California RV-6, hanging empennage (taking a break from canopy cutting) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HCRV6(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 22, 2000
Subject: Re: speed mods
In a message dated 9/21/00 5:50:16 PM Pacific Daylight Time, jsflyrv(at)teleport.com writes: << I have a picture on my web site of some streamed lined rudder spring covers that are built my Butch Malani of Medford, Oregon. Also notice the way he has streamlined his rudder horns. >> Jerry: Any idea what the long tube hanging under Butch's tail spring is for? Harry Crosby Pleasanton, California RV-6, working on canopy installation ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2000
From: Dave Bristol <bj034(at)lafn.org>
Subject: Re: Tail wheel springs
Also, think about the takeoff roll when you need right rudder to counteract the engine torque,P factor etc - do you really want the wheel to turn too? Dave Ferdfly(at)AOL.COM wrote: > > In a message dated 9/21/00 5:20:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time, > rvpilot(at)coollink.net writes: > > << he springs are necessary in order to account for the different amount of > travel each side makes when the rudder is deflected fully. Try it without > the springs and you will find that the rudder will bind before it hits the > stop(unless you have a WHOLE lot of slack in the chains) > > There are two ways around this. You could go with a single push-pull rod as > some Pitts drivers have done. I dont favor this method since then you don't > have any slack in the system . A little slack is desirable to prevent over > sensitivity. Or, you could redesign the rudder horn (as I did on my last two > RV's) so that the attach point for the steering cables is in line with the > hinge axis of the rudder. This way the differential movement is eliminated. > Works great for me . > >> Guys, I think you need those tail wheel > springs in a crosswind landing where you got a bunch of rudder in to hold the > plane straight and you`re about to set it down with the tail wheel cocked > over to one side, might break sonething. > > Fred LaForge RV-4 EAA Tech C. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JusCash(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 22, 2000
Subject: Re: Protective vinyl tubing??
In a message dated 9/22/00 9:36:07 AM Central Daylight Time, JDaniel343(at)AOL.COM writes: << According to 43.13 it is not acceptable to run wiring thru tubing. Conduit is OK of course. >> Please read AC 43.13-1B Section 8. Wiring Installation Inspection Requirements and Section 18. Conduits Cash Copeland QB #60075 RV-6 N46FC (Reserved) Oakland, Ca ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RotorMac(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 22, 2000
Subject: Checklist
Hello Listers, Does anyone know where I can acquire a checklist and POH for a RV-3A? Thanks, Mac ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2000
From: Glenn & Judi <foxinsocks(at)mediaone.net>
Subject: Metal Knobs for Throttle & Mixture controls
Hi, Before I do some custom machining to make some metal knobs for my throttle & mixture controls for my RV-6, can someone tell me if they are available somewhere as an off the shelf product? I spoke with the manufacturer(ACS products) regarding these controls, and don't make metal knobs for these controls. Thanks, Glenn Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RotorMac(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 22, 2000
Subject: Checklist and POH
Hello Listers, Does anyone know where I can acquire a checklist and POH for a RV-3A? Nothing in archives for the RV-3. Appreciate any answers. Thanks, Mac ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2000
From: Jim Cimino <jcimino(at)epix.net>
Subject: Re: Time in RV6 with CFI at OSWEGO FORUM
> >FEW OPENINGS left FOR MIKE SEAGER >Training in RV at KFZY >To reply e-mail John directly to address: > >John.Balbierer(at)nysyra.ang.af.mil > > Openings left for >Sunday, 1 October: 0800, 0930, 1300. >1st come 1st serve................. > >6th Annual Northeast RV Forum >September 30 - October 1, 2000 >Oswego County Airport Fulton NY >KFZY > >Just a reminder on the RV-List inviting people to the RV-Forum and Fly-in. > >Link our web site: >http://www.web-flight.com/486/eaarvforum.htm ><http://www.web-flight.com/486/eaarvforum.htm> > >Please pre-registered so our hand outs and food counts are more accurate. > >As in the past got lots of things planned. > >Hope to see you there >Respectfully >David McManmon > > Jim Cimino RV-8 sn 80039 N7TL Reserved http://www.geocities.com/jcimino.geo (570)842-4057 N.E. Pennsylvania ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2000
From: George True <true(at)uswest.net>
Subject: Re: Metal Knobs for Throttle & Mixture controls
Glenn, Check out Beechhurst Industries, www.beechhurst.com. George True Glenn & Judi wrote: > > Hi, > Before I do some custom machining to make some metal knobs for my > throttle & mixture controls for my RV-6, can someone tell me if they are > available somewhere as an off the shelf product? I spoke with the > manufacturer(ACS products) regarding these controls, and don't make > metal knobs for these controls. > > Thanks, > Glenn Gordon > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Phillips" <mphill(at)fgi.net>
Subject: Re: duckworth lights
Date: Sep 22, 2000
thanks for the tips Jim. Everything came out alright last night other than i was totally exhausted.hehe ----- Original Message ----- From: <Jim_Andrews(at)tivoli.com> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 9:02 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: duckworth lights > > > Mark: Just one more success story to send you off in another direction :-) > > Mine is a quick build kit so my wings were completely done when I decided to > install my lights. I just laid out the pattern and checked it five or six > times, and then got someone else to check it for me ( no room for error here ) > and whipped out the unibit and sheers and started cutting away. I was able to > easily remove all the material within an eighth of an inch of my line. The rest > I did with a two inch scotch bright wheel on a straight die grinder attachment. > They turned out remarkably well. Not a scratch out side the lines and all the > surfaces were practically polished by the scotch bright wheel. > > - Jim Andrews > RV-8A ( windscreen fun ) > O-360 Sensenich > N89JA reserved > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2000
From: Bruce Stewart <bruces(at)shoalhaven.net.au>
Subject: re:trim control
Hi All, I've been pouring over the pre view set and I can't see where exactly the trim control (lever) is installed? (not on the drawings I got anyway). ??? Thanks Bruce ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Phillips" <mphill(at)fgi.net>
Subject: Re: duckworth lights
Date: Sep 22, 2000
Thanks for the tip,Harry. Did one wing last night and went to bed totally exhausted. I thought i'd screw it up for sure. Damn that learning curve. Now the other wing will be perfect. Thanks again!!!!! ----- Original Message ----- From: <HCRV6(at)AOL.COM> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 1:34 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: duckworth lights > > In a message dated 9/21/00 4:18:13 PM Pacific Daylight Time, mphill(at)fgi.net > writes: > > << The time has come to put the lights in the leading edge,since i dont have > it > riveted to the spar yet. I must say that I'm pretty nervous cutting on a > perfectly good leading edge.Anybody got any pointers???? > >> > When I did mine, also for Duckworks, I used my Unibit to cut the corners and > a > Dremel with a cutoff wheel in between. Always cut inside the final lines and > use a smooth file and sandpaper to finish. Worked for me. > > Harry Crosby > Pleasanton, California > RV-6, hanging empennage (taking a break from canopy cutting) > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2000
From: "Owens, Laird" <Owens(at)aerovironment.com>
Subject: Repairman's Certificate
Ok, dumb question time. When I had my RV inspected (in late May) for it's air worthiness certificate, the inspector looked at my construction logs and photos. During the confusion of the day, I forgot to ask how to go about getting my repairmans cert. I see that he gave me a rating application form (FAA Form 8610-2) but it's just a blank application. I want to get this taken care of before the first condition inspection. I sure hope there's no time window that I've blown thru. I assume I have to turn this form into the local FSDO but I'm a little confused about the form. Do I need the DAR to sign it? I think I can fill everything out in section I, but it's section II and III thats got me. Can anyone help me thru this. Thanks, Laird ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DWENSING(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 22, 2000
Subject: Re: RV-6A QB Slider Project for Sale
In a message dated 9/22/00 8:28:23 AM Central Daylight Time, cebrowne(at)earthlink.net writes: << I've had enough. I am just to anal and to slow, >> Chris, being a bit anal and slow makes for a great airplane! You can always rent while your building. Hope you don't give it up but if you must I'm sure someone will be happy to benefit from all of your conscientious hardwork on the RV. Good luck with what ever you buy. Dale Ensing Cary Illinois RV-6A O-360 (finishing details) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6bldr(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: re:trim control
Date: Sep 22, 2000
Don't know which pre-plans you are studying, but...... On the 6/6a the manual aileron trim is between the seats. Here is a good photo from Sam's site that shows the setup. <http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal/fuse9.html> The manual elevator trim can be mounted in various positions either on the instrument panel, on the center support, or on a bracket just ahead of the fuel selector valve. Here's a good shot of where Sam put his on the center support. <http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal/finish3.html> The rudder generally has a fixed tab to trim it in cruise, so no levers needed here. And of course if you go electric on the trims, the switches are mounted either on the instrument panel, control stick grip, or wherever your imagination takes you! Sounds like it is time to order an empennage! Jerry Calvert Edmond Ok -6 fuselage ----- Original Message ----- From: Bruce Stewart <bruces(at)shoalhaven.net.au> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 5:19 PM Subject: RV-List: re:trim control > > Hi All, > > I've been pouring over the pre view set and I can't see where exactly > the trim control (lever) is installed? (not on the drawings I got anyway). > > ??? > > Thanks > Bruce > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Phillips" <mphill(at)fgi.net>
Subject: duckworth interior
Date: Sep 22, 2000
Should the inside of the duckworths light installation be painted or left bare aluminum. Reflectivity tells me not to. What do you think? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Robertson" <mrobert569(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Checklist
Date: Sep 22, 2000
Mac, I haven't seen one for a -3. I have one that I am in the middle of developing for an -8A. I could try and send it to you if you think it would help. Mike Robertson RV-8A First engine run done. Timer to weigh and get the paperwork in. >From: RotorMac(at)AOL.COM >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com, RotorMac(at)AOL.COM >To: rv3-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV-List: Checklist >Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 17:22:22 EDT > > >Hello Listers, > >Does anyone know where I can acquire a checklist and POH for a RV-3A? > >Thanks, >Mac > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John" <fasching(at)amigo.net>
Subject: Re: Repairman's Certificate
Date: Sep 22, 2000
I didn't have anyone sign mine..the FAA inspector just said that AFTER I had flown off my restriction time to submit it. I did, and it came very soon thereafter. RV6A Flying Salida, CO ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom & Cathy Ervin" <tcervin(at)valkyrie.net>
Subject: Re: duckworth interior
Date: Sep 22, 2000
Mark: Painted mine Bright White as it looks better when viewed through the Lens when the plane is stationary. I have done this when restoring cars as it makes for brighter running and parking lights to also paint the reflector. Tom in Ohio ----- Original Message ----- From: Mark Phillips <mphill(at)fgi.net> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 7:16 PM Subject: RV-List: duckworth interior > > Should the inside of the duckworths light installation be painted or left > bare aluminum. Reflectivity tells me not to. What do you think? > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom & Cathy Ervin" <tcervin(at)valkyrie.net>
Subject: Re: duckworth interior
Date: Sep 22, 2000
Mark: Painted mine Bright White as it looks better when viewed through the Lens when the plane is stationary. I have done this when restoring cars as it makes for brighter running and parking lights to also paint the reflector. Tom in Ohio ----- Original Message ----- From: Mark Phillips <mphill(at)fgi.net> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 7:16 PM Subject: RV-List: duckworth interior > > Should the inside of the duckworths light installation be painted or left > bare aluminum. Reflectivity tells me not to. What do you think? > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2000
From: Mike Thompson <grobdriver(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: duckworth interior
--- Mark Phillips wrote: > > Should the inside of the duckworths light installation be painted or > left > bare aluminum. Reflectivity tells me not to. What do you think? If you're talking about the inside of the wing bay - I painted mine white over the Variprime, skin and ribs. Mike Thompson Austin, TX -6 N140RV (Reserved) Fuselage Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2000
From: "Martin G. Santic" <martinsan(at)home.com>
Subject: Deft Primer Experience
I don't want to start a primer thread (based on what I have read in the archives) but need some information. Please reply to me "off-list" if you have used or are using Deft primer. A "good friend", but a Glastar builder, has suggested its use. Have a few questions for all of you. Thanks. Marty Santic RV-9A Empennage Davenport, IA email: martinsan(at)home.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Alex Peterson" <alexpeterson(at)usjet.net>
Subject: Re: Metal Knobs for Throttle & Mixture controls
Date: Sep 22, 2000
> Hi, > Before I do some custom machining to make some metal knobs for my > throttle & mixture controls for my RV-6, can someone tell me if they are > available somewhere as an off the shelf product? I spoke with the > manufacturer(ACS products) regarding these controls, and don't make > metal knobs for these controls. > > Thanks, > Glenn Gordon Not really an answer to your question, but I wanted to share a very favorable experience with ACS. I needed special length engine controls not stocked by Van's, so I called them. Gave them what I needed, and they said they would ship them the next day. Sure enough, the controls showed up in a couple days. Some key things to specify are: plastic jacketed, length of travel and length from the threaded bulkhead (like Van's type) to the end of the 10-32 threaded part. Alex Peterson Maple Grove, MN 6A O360, Airflow, CS may fly in '01 ------ http://USFamily.Net/info - Unlimited Internet - From $7.99/mo! ------ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2000
Subject: Re: Engine Vibration Mounts
From: Scott R McDaniels <smcdaniels(at)juno.com>
From: "Bob Busick" <panamared(at)brier.net> Subject: RV-List: Re: Engine Vibration Mounts FYI. I have had Engine Vibration Mounts, part # EA DYNA VI-AEROBATIC on order from Vans for 8 weeks and counting. Vans still claims that they are due in on 25 Aug 00. To be fair, I have checked with Aircraft Spruce and they do not have them either. For those of you who plan to mount your engine soon, be warned, order these parts early. If anyone has some they will not need in the near future, If you are willing to sell, I would be interested in buying. Bob Busick Been Ready to Mount the Engine - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bob, Unless you are planning to do hard core aerobatics in your RV I suggest you reconsider just using the regular mounts. The major majority of RV's that are flying have the regular mounts which have no effect on the capabilities for doing aerobatics. The aerobatic mounts may be on back order because not many get sold. It may be the case with the standard ones also but more than likely they are in stock and could be shipped right away. Scott McDaniels North Plains, OR These opinions and ideas are my own and may not reflect the opinions or ideas of my employer. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rob Reece" <ReeceRV3(at)email.msn.com>
Subject: Re: RV3-List: re:trim control
Date: Sep 22, 2000
Bruce- On the newer plans (1984+) the placement of the elevator trim lever is difficult to see (going by the preview plans). It is on drawing 25 left side view, section D-D. Drawing 27 gives the attachment details. On the older plans (pre-1984) the elevator trim lever placement is easier to see (full size plans anyway?) on drawing 16 left side view and the section J-J detail shows the actual lever and not just the cutout per the newer plans. Drawing 20 gives the attachment details (differ from the newer plans). Hope that helps? RV-3's forever! Rob Reece RV-3 SN45 "total rebuild" project ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Stewart" <bruces(at)shoalhaven.net.au> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 5:19 PM Subject: RV3-List: re:trim control > --> RV3-List message posted by: Bruce Stewart > > Hi All, > > I've been pouring over the pre view set and I can't see where exactly > the trim control (lever) is installed? (not on the drawings I got anyway). > > ??? > > Thanks > Bruce > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2000
From: Bruce Stewart <bruces(at)shoalhaven.net.au>
Subject: Re: RV3-List: re:trim control
OK got it thanks to all. Whats next? do I get divorsed now or do I add ammenities to the shed for the day I chucked out =:o) !!!! It seems that the average build time here in OZ is any thing between 1 year and 10+! how much time did you guys take to build? Bruce >Bruce- > >On the newer plans (1984+) the placement of the elevator trim lever is >difficult to see (going by the preview plans). It is on drawing 25 left >side view, section D-D. Drawing 27 gives the attachment details. > >On the older plans (pre-1984) the elevator trim lever placement is easier to >see (full size plans anyway?) on drawing 16 left side view and the section >J-J detail shows the actual lever and not just the cutout per the newer >plans. Drawing 20 gives the attachment details (differ from the newer >plans). > >Hope that helps? > >RV-3's forever! > >Rob Reece >RV-3 SN45 "total rebuild" project > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Bruce Stewart" <bruces(at)shoalhaven.net.au> >To: >Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 5:19 PM >Subject: RV3-List: re:trim control > > >> --> RV3-List message posted by: Bruce Stewart >> >> Hi All, >> >> I've been pouring over the pre view set and I can't see where exactly >> the trim control (lever) is installed? (not on the drawings I got anyway). >> >> ??? >> >> Thanks >> Bruce >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "James E. Clark" <jclark(at)conterra.com>
Subject: Re: Metal Knobs for Throttle & Mixture controls
Date: Sep 23, 2000
I too am trying to find knobs for Van's throttle quadrant. Please post results. James ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glenn & Judi" <foxinsocks(at)mediaone.net> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 5:25 PM Subject: RV-List: Metal Knobs for Throttle & Mixture controls > > Hi, > Before I do some custom machining to make some metal knobs for my > throttle & mixture controls for my RV-6, can someone tell me if they are > available somewhere as an off the shelf product? I spoke with the > manufacturer(ACS products) regarding these controls, and don't make > metal knobs for these controls. > > Thanks, > Glenn Gordon > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "James E. Clark" <jclark(at)conterra.com>
Subject: Re: Metal Knobs for Throttle & Mixture controls
Date: Sep 23, 2000
I did check with them. Even purchased a quadrant. Asked about the knobs and they are over $100! James ----- Original Message ----- From: "George True" <true(at)uswest.net> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 6:05 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Metal Knobs for Throttle & Mixture controls > > Glenn, > > Check out Beechhurst Industries, www.beechhurst.com. > > George True > > Glenn & Judi wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > Before I do some custom machining to make some metal knobs for my > > throttle & mixture controls for my RV-6, can someone tell me if they are > > available somewhere as an off the shelf product? I spoke with the > > manufacturer(ACS products) regarding these controls, and don't make > > metal knobs for these controls. > > > > Thanks, > > Glenn Gordon > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2000
From: Finn Lassen <finnlassen(at)netzero.net>
Subject: Re: Repairman's Certificate
The DAR should (have) handle(d) it for you. Time limit is before first condition inspection, I think. Finn "Owens, Laird" wrote: > > Ok, dumb question time. > > When I had my RV inspected (in late May) for it's air worthiness certificate, the inspector looked at my construction logs and photos. During the confusion of the day, I forgot to ask how to go about getting my repairmans cert. I see that he gave me a rating application form (FAA Form 8610-2) but it's just a blank application. > > I want to get this taken care of before the first condition inspection. I sure hope there's no time window that I've blown thru. > > I assume I have to turn this form into the local FSDO but I'm a little confused about the form. Do I need the DAR to sign it? > > I think I can fill everything out in section I, but it's section II and III thats got me. > > Can anyone help me thru this. > > Thanks, > > Laird Why pay for something you could get for free? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CW9371(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 23, 2000
Subject: Re: Metal Knobs for Throttle & Mixture controls
In a message dated 9/22/2000 11:15:23 PM Central Daylight Time, jclark(at)conterra.com writes: << I did check with them. Even purchased a quadrant. Asked about the knobs and they are over $100! James >> Call Mark at team rocket. I know Mark gets his controlls made for him so I am sure that he can get just parts for them ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2000
From: pdsmith <pdsmith(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: Metal Knobs for Throttle & Mixture controls
Glenn: I replaced Van's wooden knobs with (plastic) Piper parts for a late model single with a similar quadrant. More professional looking I think. You can get them from a dealer. Phil, 80691 ----- Original Message ----- From: Glenn & Judi <foxinsocks(at)mediaone.net> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 2:25 PM Subject: RV-List: Metal Knobs for Throttle & Mixture controls > > Hi, > Before I do some custom machining to make some metal knobs for my > throttle & mixture controls for my RV-6, can someone tell me if they are > available somewhere as an off the shelf product? I spoke with the > manufacturer(ACS products) regarding these controls, and don't make > metal knobs for these controls. > > Thanks, > Glenn Gordon > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2000
From: noeldrew <noeldrew(at)iafrica.com>
Subject: Jon Johansen
For those of you interested in Jon's progress, he left Durban South Africa this morning at 04:51 UT. Weather is fair on this leg to Reunion Island in the Indian Ocean with all winds favourable. His next leg has encountered bureaucracy in the form of a ban on single engined aircraft departing Rodrigues Island for Cocos Island. His only alternative is a longer route through two inter-tropical convergence zones via Male with the threat of storms. Such is the wisdom of flight safety that perhaps single engined aircraft were not intended to go wandering. It was a pleasure and a privilege to host him. Noel Drew RV6 ZU-APF Durban, South Africa. noeldrew(at)iafrica.com ________________________________________________________________________________ rv-list
From: Jim Sears <sears(at)searnet.com>
Subject: Middlesboro fly-in
Date: - - - , 20-
Gangsters and RV-listers There is to be a EAA fly-in at Middlesboro,KY (1A6) on Sept. 30 - October 1. Rob Herklotz, our AYA Southern Region coordinator, has confirmed these dates for us. I understand it's usually a pretty good event and centers around the P-38 restoration project that came from the Greenland ice cap. I've heard they've had some pretty nice warbirds at the event, in the past. I've never been to the event due to conflicts or weather; but, I'm planning on being there this time. Gangsters, I know this is the "New Orleans" weekend for you southern region AYA members; but, perhaps some the our more local Grumman drivers will find this event easier to get to. I think Rob is going to be there because he doesn't live far from Middlesboro and couldn't make it to New Orleans. BTW, the nice thing about the P-38 project is that you can get close and personal with it. The restorers encougage people like us to enjoy our visits to the project and do allow some touchy-feely of the aircraft. That's a bit unusual, to me. What's even more unusual is the fact that the restorers stop their work to talk with us. They want us to know all about the project and are very proud of what they're doing. I must admit it's quite a project and was an inspiration to me as I was building my RV-6A. Oh, yeah. One of the guys is a RV nut, too. I hope you guys show up in your Grummans, Yankees, and RV's. I'm sure planning to be there on Saturday, weather permitting. Jim Sears in KY RV-6A N198JS ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2000
From: Glenn & Judi <foxinsocks(at)mediaone.net>
Subject: Re: Metal Knobs for Throttle & Mixture controls
Sorry if I wasn't clear on the post, but I am looking to replace the knobs on the push-pull type throttle and mixture controls. This is the panel mount type and not the throttle quadrant type. -Glenn > > Hi, > > Before I do some custom machining to make some metal knobs for my > > throttle & mixture controls for my RV-6, can someone tell me if they are > > available somewhere as an off the shelf product? I spoke with the > > manufacturer(ACS products) regarding these controls, and don't make > > metal knobs for these controls. > > > > Thanks, > > Glenn Gordon > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bruce Meacham" <bruceme3(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: RV3-List: Checklist
Date: Sep 23, 2000
A POH for a homebuilt is subjective(or not required). If the aircraft is "properly placarded" a POH is not required (see the regs). Exactly what that means, I can't recall off the top of my head. Ir-regardless of regulations, what you really want to know is W&B, V speeds and systems. W&B: I ran a full matrix of schenarios (There aren't many on a -3) and checked them against Van's recomended Weight and CG range. I can basically do anything (except overload the rear storage) and still be inside CG range. V Speeds. Van's publishes expected V speeds. I can't say either way to expect those numbers, but for first flight, you _must_ do at least one stall to accurately determine stall speed. The bottom of my arc's (both white and green) aren't exactly where stall happens. As for checklists: My non-gyro day VFR -3 is pretty simple, so I just placarded a small pre-takeoff check list onto my panel. see: http://www.seanet.com/~bruceme/rv3new/rv3new.htm I laser printed the list onto a clear Avery mailing label. The top part is the basics; fligth controls, altimeter accellarometer, voltage check. The middle is a standard flow check (also pre-landing); mixture, carb heat, mags on both, primer in and locked, fuel lever down. The bottom is engine run-up then a reminder to set transponder to alt and set the radio. I hope this was what you were looking for. Bruce Meacham ----- Original Message ----- From: <RotorMac(at)aol.com> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 5:22 PM Subject: RV3-List: Checklist > --> RV3-List message posted by: RotorMac(at)aol.com > > Hello Listers, > > Does anyone know where I can acquire a checklist and POH for a RV-3A? > > Thanks, > Mac > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV4Brown(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 23, 2000
Subject: Re: Metal Knobs for Throttle & Mixture controls
Hi Glenn, Check out the REID Tool Supply Company. www.reidtool.com I don't know whether they have exactly what you want but they sure do carry a bunch of different types of knobs in a variety of materials. Prices are very reasonable with quick delivery. The company has been around for a long time. Tom Brown RV4 flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Are Barstad" <abarstad(at)bconnex.net>
Subject: Antenna Suggestions for IFR
Date: Sep 23, 2000
Listers: I'm about to finish all the fairings on the empennage and like to do extra work whle I wait for the wings (another 2 weeks). I will definately make my RV-8 IFR and need to come up with the most practiable solution that creates the least amount of drag. I will use: 1 GNS-450 (or similar) (NAV(LOC & GS), COM, GPS) 1 NAV/COM 1 Transponder 1 ELT I know there is a combined VOR/GS/LOC antenna (cat whisker style for the vertical stabilizer) and splitters available so I can use two NAV's on one antenna etc. I'm not sure if this is legal for IFR requirements though. Any suggetions for best location and combination of antennas? Best regards, Are Barstad RV-8 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2000
From: KostaLewis <mikel(at)dimensional.com>
Subject: Burlington Bummer
SO: this year I am geared up to go to Burlington. Previous years: unable due to lots of other stuff. Look outside. Yes, I can see the house across the street. But it is a lot greyer than usual. Those of you close enough can still DRIVE over. GrrrrrrrrRRRRrrrrrr............... Clearing by Monday.... Michael RV-4 N232 Suzie Q In the hanger....................... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2000
From: "Martin G. Santic" <martinsan(at)home.com>
Subject: RV-9A HS Main Ribs
I am in the process of fluting the main ribs for the horizontal stabilizer and have noticed that the upper surface of the flange, on the tab, at the forward end of the rib is a bit lower than the upper surface of the main flange of the rib. This small height sifference is most noticable at the 90 degree bend line of the rib's flange (tab and main flange). Worried that the skin will buldge up a bit at this location. Is there something I should be doing to alleviate?? Marty Santic RV-9A Empennage Davenport, IA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom Barnes" <skytop(at)corecomm.net>
Subject: Chicago Area RV-Ator picnic 9/24
Date: Sep 23, 2000
This is a reminder to some, and an announcement to others. The Fall picnic is tomorrow, Sunday 9/24 at Casa de Aero in Hampshire, IL. Plan to arrive around 11 - 12:00, and eat around 12:15. If weather is bad in the morning, the time may slide a couple hours, but please come. There is no rain date scheduled. Tom Barnes Fly-in and Departure Procedures Casa de Aero (C38) 860ft ASL N42 09.0 W088 34.0 326/18.3nm fr DPA 122.9 CTAF 09 Right turn traffic 27 Left turn traffic (this keeps you to the south of the runway) Don't fly over homes; fly over ends of runway. No intersection departures Normally, run-ups are done in front of the residents home. In this case, unless you are informed otherwise, do it at the end of the runway being as considerate as possible. If landing in crosswind, consider using the grass on the North side of the main runway. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: LeastDrag93066(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 23, 2000
Subject: Re: Antenna Suggestions for IFR
In a message dated 09/23/2000 7:21:40 AM Pacific Daylight Time, abarstad(at)bconnex.net writes: > Any suggetions for best location and combination of antennas? > > Best regards, > Are Barstad > RV-8 > The best performing NAV antenna is still Bob Archer's Wingtip NAV antenna (added bonus of zero drag) Jim Ayers RV-3 N47RV ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2000
From: pincjt(at)ix.netcom.com
Subject: RV8 Elevator HELP
Hi Friends, When attaching E-604 tip rib to E-602pp spar do I need to trim the E-604 rib flange so not to force it between the spar flanges? Rainy and cold here in Des Moines, a great day to build an airplane! Thanks, Jack Textor RV8 Right Elevator Des Moines, IA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MOOREWAR(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 23, 2000
Subject: rv4 and landoll balancer
Could not find anything in the archives, Has anyone installed a Landoll balancer on an 0-320 rv-4 with the constant speed cowl? Looks like I will need to trim off about 3/4 -1" off the inside of the front of the cowl. Will this weaken the cowl too much ? thanks, Warren Moore HB,Ca ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Hurlbut" <shurlbut(at)island.net>
Subject: Elevator trim cover plate
Date: Sep 23, 2000
Are the K1100-06 platenuts and AN507-6R6 screws not included in the emp kit to attach the elevator trim cover plate? If the plans call for them where are they? Van's supplied K1000-06 platenuts and AN515-6R8 screws. Tired of paying for shipping and duty on these little things. Steve Hurlbut shurlbut(at)island.net RV-6 emp Comox, BC, Canada ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Hurlbut" <shurlbut(at)island.net>
Subject: Re: RV8 Elevator HELP
Date: Sep 23, 2000
Yes! Assuming it's the same as for a RV-6. It states it right in the construction manual for the RV-6. Steve Hurlbut shurlbut(at)island.net RV-6 emp C-FSND Comox, BC, Canada ----- Original Message ----- From: <pincjt(at)ix.netcom.com> Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2000 10:12 AM Subject: RV-List: RV8 Elevator HELP > > Hi Friends, > When attaching E-604 tip rib to E-602pp spar do I need to trim the E-604 rib flange so not to > force it between the spar flanges? Rainy and cold here in Des Moines, a great day to build an > airplane! > Thanks, > Jack Textor > RV8 Right Elevator > Des Moines, IA > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "sue gregor" <hailey67(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: RV FOR SALE
Date: Sep 23, 2000
RV8 QUICK BUILD KIT FOR SALE WITH OR WITHOUT ENGINE AND ENGINE ACCESSORIES. INTERESTED PARTIES PLEASE REPLY OFF RV LIST. THANK YOU. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2000
From: Bob Haan <bhaan(at)easystreet.com>
Subject: Re: Wing-tip landing lights & wig-wag flasher
At 07:24 AM 9/22/00 , you wrote: > >Hi All... >Bill, Bill, All the current, about 8 amps for two 55 watt bulbs and 16 amps for two 100 watt bulbs goes through the switch. Although this works, it could be a more reliable installation if the switches did not have to carry this high current load. Bill Benedict preached that it was a very good idea to have two fuses or circuit breakers, one for each light. He felt that this redundancy significantly reduced the possibility that you would land in the dark. Depending on the speed to of the flasher, the bulbs may not come up to full brightness. The WIgWag pattern will increase safety by making you more noticeable and a full bright flash pattern will make you noticeable from a greater distance. The mechanical relays may generate some Radio Frequency noise as they open and close. Some other features that might be considered; bulb filament warming to extend bulb life. In-rush current control for extended bulb life. The mechanical relay, flasher, DPDT Switch that are rated for heavy currents, and the longer runs of 14 gage wire that connects to the switches and then out to the leading edge lights may weight more than a solid state timer and a MOSFET switching circuit design. We have been developing a WigWag solid state leading edge lights controller that has these features plus many more. Yesterday we wrapped up the last engineering issue which, would you believe, was finding a good light weight material and technique to pot the circuit inside the case. As of today we can now begin to build these units. By the way, the circuit has been running a long durability test sense last spring with perfect results. The WIgWag unit is controlled by 3 wires which command the unit when they are switched to ground. The current draw when they are switched to ground is extremely small. As a result, almost any switch can be used to do control the lights. These 3 control wires provide the builder a choice of a large number of different on off functions for the leading edge lights using a large number of possible switch combinations and switch types. A simple example would be SPDT center off switch that would command the leading edge lights to be off, both on or WIgWaging. A more elaborate installation could command five states by using a rotatory switch; All Off, Taxi on, Landing on, Both on, and WigWag. The wiring of the three control wires to do this is extremely easy to design and install. We have designed this unit to make the installation and wiring very easy. For an Acrobat or Microsoft Word file with the information you would need to plan and design this into your panel, send me a request off line. Bob >I have the wig-wag flasher details posted that I was talking about the other >day, along with the wing-tip landing light installation... Here a GOOD link >this time :) > >http://vondane.com/rv8a/ideas/index.htm > >Bill VonDane, Colorado Springs, CO >RV-8A, N8VD, Wings Bob Haan http://easystreet.com/~bhaan/ bhaan(at)easystreet.com Portland, OR RV6A 24461 Wiring the panel ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2000
From: pincjt(at)ix.netcom.com
Subject: RV-8 Elevator HELP
Thanks Steve, My manual and plans didn't specify. Jack Textor ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2000
From: David Aronson <aronsond(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: RV FOR SALE
Sue: Would like to know at what point kit is finished. Also about engine. where are you, how much, all the appropriate questions. Thanks Dave Aronson RV4 504RV sue gregor wrote: > > > RV8 QUICK BUILD KIT FOR SALE WITH OR WITHOUT ENGINE AND ENGINE ACCESSORIES. > INTERESTED PARTIES PLEASE REPLY OFF RV LIST. THANK YOU. > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2000
From: bcbraem(at)home.com
Subject: Re: Simple Green (wasRemove blue markings newer skins)
The main problem discussed in the original Air Force paper was the "sandwich effect"--Simple Green getting into seams, lapped joints and under rivets/fasteners and not being thoroughly rinsed out and dried. If any Simple Green remained in the enclosed areas, any further exposure to moisture would cause a continuing corrosive condition. Thus, the Air Force and Army placed an outright ban on the use of Simple Green on aluminum aircraft skins. Simple Green does not appear to be as corrosive as "Fantastic" or "409", but other products are available that meet aircraft specs, such as "Super Blue" and "Big Orange Plus", in concentrated solution, that work as cleaners and de-greasers, available from Aircraft Spruce. Boyd > > > In a message dated 9/21/00 8:40:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > shelbyrv6a(at)mindspring.com writes: > > << It is highly corrosive. I wouldn't use it. >> > > Hmmmm! I have lots of parts that have been in storage for over five years > since they were cleaned with Simple Green, thoroughly flushed with water, and > primed. Not a sign of corrosion anywhere. I have trouble understanding the > difference between this and the etching acids (very highly corrosive) that > many people use routinely? Can someone explain. > > Harry Crosby > Pleasanton, California > RV-6, working on canopy installation > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2000
From: Glenn & Judi <foxinsocks(at)mediaone.net>
Subject: Anodizing Problem
Hi, I am experimenting with anodizing some aluminum parts (non structural, knobs to be specific). The first step is going well. I have succeeded in getting a non-conductive anodizing on the scrap aluminum I am experimenting with. After this step, I am immersing the part in highly concentrated rit dye solution (luke warm). The problem is that the dye doesn't seem to be taking to the anodizing. Any suggestions? -Glenn Gordon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2000
From: Chris Sheehan <ctsheehan(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Elevator trim cover plate
My emp kit came with K1000's and 515's; but the electric elevator trim hardware kit (ordered separately) came with 1100's and 507's. If I'm not mistaken the plans call out K1000's, but I don't have the plans in front of me right now. Chris Steve Hurlbut wrote: > > > Are the K1100-06 platenuts and AN507-6R6 screws not included in the emp kit > to attach the elevator trim cover plate? > If the plans call for them where are they? Van's supplied K1000-06 platenuts > and AN515-6R8 screws. > > Tired of paying for shipping and duty on these little things. > Steve Hurlbut > shurlbut(at)island.net > RV-6 emp > Comox, BC, Canada > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Burlington Bummer
Date: Sep 23, 2000
> > >SO: this year I am geared up to go to Burlington. Previous years: unable >due to lots of other stuff. Look outside. Yes, I can see the house across >the street. But it is a lot greyer than usual. > >Those of you close enough can still DRIVE over. > >GrrrrrrrrRRRRrrrrrr............... > >Clearing by Monday.... > >Michael >RV-4 N232 Suzie Q >In the hanger....................... Indeed a bummer. I, too was planning on flying up there early this morning...until I saw the current conditions up there. Ick! So, plan "B"...fly to Farmington, NM for a small fly-in. Had fun, plane was surrounded with admirers (I'm still grinning and my head is horribly swollen). Winds were HOWLING by the time I left and gusting to 34 KNOTS at home base. Got beat up thoroughly by that nasty wx that hammered Colorado and northern NM. Such is life in Mother Nature's element. Better luck next year folks. Brian Denk RV8 N94BD 132 hrs ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2000
From: joe wiza <jwiza1(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: CP RPM
I have an 0360A1D with hertzel cp and woodward Gov (Prop and Gov from Vans)I've been pleased with the acft performance. However I get 2500 rpm on take and climb upon, lowering the nose the rpm runs up to 2700 rpm. I metioned this to an AE and he said as long as im satisfied leave it alone because if the rpm gets to 2700 in climb it will exceed red line when leaveling out. What say you engine prop guru's out there. Thanks ahead for any info. do not archieve RV6A 100 hrs and climbing ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Steffensen" <steffco1(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Burlington Bummer
Date: Sep 23, 2000
I too, was planning on making Burlington today. I instead attended a EAA Dallas Chapter Poker Run & won 25 gal of 100ll, not bad for 3 of a kind. I hope for better weather next year. See you in at Abilene in October Mark Steffensen 8A Dallas, TX N783MS 45 hours ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2000 5:29 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Burlington Bummer > > > > > > > > > >SO: this year I am geared up to go to Burlington. Previous years: unable > >due to lots of other stuff. Look outside. Yes, I can see the house across > >the street. But it is a lot greyer than usual. > > > >Those of you close enough can still DRIVE over. > > > >GrrrrrrrrRRRRrrrrrr............... > > > >Clearing by Monday.... > > > >Michael > >RV-4 N232 Suzie Q > >In the hanger....................... > > > Indeed a bummer. I, too was planning on flying up there early this > morning...until I saw the current conditions up there. Ick! So, plan > "B"...fly to Farmington, NM for a small fly-in. Had fun, plane was > surrounded with admirers (I'm still grinning and my head is horribly > swollen). Winds were HOWLING by the time I left and gusting to 34 KNOTS at > home base. Got beat up thoroughly by that nasty wx that hammered Colorado > and northern NM. Such is life in Mother Nature's element. > > Better luck next year folks. > > Brian Denk > RV8 N94BD > 132 hrs > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Harvey Sigmon" <flyhars(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: CP RPM
Date: Sep 23, 2000
Joe: I don't want to start a thread but I had a hartzell on my last RV. I would suspect that the low pitch stop is not set correctly. In the Prop instruction you probable need to set the static RPM to 2650 so the system will work when the governor goes above 2700 RPM and that will cure the low RPM on TO. The Low pitch stop is the nut and screw in the forward end of the prop dome. Make small adjustment I think counterclockwise to increase, but check you Hartzell manual that came with the prop to explain the procedure. Hope this helps. Harvey Sigmon RV-6AQB Canopy stuff DNA ----- Original Message ----- From: "joe wiza" <jwiza1(at)yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2000 7:11 PM Subject: RV-List: CP RPM > > I have an 0360A1D with hertzel cp and woodward Gov > (Prop and Gov from Vans)I've been pleased with the > acft performance. However I get 2500 rpm on take and > climb upon, lowering the nose the rpm runs up to 2700 > rpm. I metioned this to an AE and he said as long as > im satisfied leave it alone because if the rpm gets to > 2700 in climb it will exceed red line when leaveling > out. What say you engine prop guru's out there. Thanks > ahead for any info. do not archieve > > RV6A 100 hrs and climbing > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV4Brown(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 23, 2000
Subject: Re: CP RPM
Hi Joe, This doesn't sound right. One of the main reasons for having the constant speed prop is to develop full horsepower on takeoff. With this engine, unless you are turning 2700 rpm, that isn't happening. The fact that the engine does run up to full speed in cruise suggests that the prop stops are set too course in the flat pitch. There is a simple procedure in the owners manual for changing the flat pitch stop. If the prop over revved in cruise, I would suspect the governor. You state that the prop governor does limit the rpm to 2700 in cruise. The governor would do the same on climb provided the prop could pitch flat enough to turn up the rpms. Since you don't complain about an anemic takeoff and climb, I am assuming that your engine is performing to spec and operating normally. In any case, the prop governor and prop should allow the engine to run up to 2700 unless the horsepower has really dropped off. READ THE MANUAL CAREFULLY BEFORE YOU MAKE ANY ADJUSTMENTS. Tom Brown RV4 O-360 Hartzel CS Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GRAYK9(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 23, 2000
Subject: Empannage fairings
Does anyone know about any after-market empannage fairings? If so, which ones need the least amount of rework, and how do they compare to Van's stock fairing? Chuck ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2000
From: Dave Bristol <bj034(at)lafn.org>
Subject: Re: Repairman's Certificate
My DAR said that the feds had to handle it, that he couldn't. Dave Finn Lassen wrote: > > The DAR should (have) handle(d) it for you. > > Time limit is before first condition inspection, I think. > > Finn > > "Owens, Laird" wrote: > > > > > Ok, dumb question time. > > > > When I had my RV inspected (in late May) for it's air worthiness certificate, the inspector looked at my construction logs and photos. During the confusion of the day, I forgot to ask how to go about getting my repairmans cert.... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2000
From: Chris Good <chrisjgood(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Empannage fairings
> >Does anyone know about any after-market empannage fairings? If so, which >ones need the least amount of rework, and how do they compare to Van's stock >fairing? >Chuck Chuck, I just received an empennage fairing for my 6A from Bob at Fairings Etc. Imfairings(at)aol.com Even after heat gun treatment, my standard Van's fairing looked awful & was going to require a lot of rework. I have not finished fitting it yet, but it lies in place very smoothly, & is a high quality molding. Check the RV-list archives for more comments about this one. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: KBoatri144(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 23, 2000
Subject: Re: Question for 6/6A QB/Slider Builders
In a message dated 9/23/00 10:07:22 PM Eastern Daylight Time, KAKlewin(at)AOL.COM writes: > Hello All...once again... > > Just need someone to un"confuse" me a bit. Im working on fitting the > F-6106 Forward Top Skin. Ive drilled and dimpled all the appropriate holes > and trimmed the forward/bottom edges (leaving the rear edge for when I get > the panel in). My question is this...the only holes left open by vans on > the > fuse where the ones forward of the F-6105 bulkhead (along the longeron).... > do > I need to drill out some of the rivits aft of the F-6105 that were installed > > by Vans? Even after the trimming it seems to me you need to rivit the > bottom edges along the main longeron aft of the F-6105. Additionally, Ive > been burning my brain looking at the plans (SC-1 through 4) looking for some > > type of measurements or something to describe the cutout (U-Shaped) where > the > F-6106 top skin is allowed to go over the canopy, and part is allowed to go > under the canopy. Do you just do this when fitting the canopy and make a > cut > just based on what you think you need? Thanks for the help........ > > Regards, > > Kurt, OKC, OK Kyle Boatright - Kennesaw, GA RV-6 Slider, O-320/Aymar-Demuth ________________________________________________________________________________
From: KBoatri144(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 23, 2000
Subject: Re: Question for 6/6A QB/Slider Builders
In a message dated 9/23/00 10:07:22 PM Eastern Daylight Time, KAKlewin(at)AOL.COM writes: > Hello All...once again... > > Just need someone to un"confuse" me a bit. Im working on fitting the > F-6106 Forward Top Skin. Ive drilled and dimpled all the appropriate holes > and trimmed the forward/bottom edges (leaving the rear edge for when I get > the panel in). My question is this...the only holes left open by vans on > the > fuse where the ones forward of the F-6105 bulkhead (along the longeron).... > do > I need to drill out some of the rivits aft of the F-6105 that were installed > > by Vans? Even after the trimming it seems to me you need to rivit the > bottom edges along the main longeron aft of the F-6105. Additionally, Ive > been burning my brain looking at the plans (SC-1 through 4) looking for some > > type of measurements or something to describe the cutout (U-Shaped) where > the > F-6106 top skin is allowed to go over the canopy, and part is allowed to go > under the canopy. Do you just do this when fitting the canopy and make a > cut > just based on what you think you need? Thanks for the help........ > > Regards, > > Kurt, OKC, OK Kurt, Drill new rivet holes along the longerons between the exisiting rivets. As far as I remember, there are no dimensioned drawings of the cutouts you're describing. Also, if I remember correctly, Scott McDaniels said he didn't make the cutouts, and simply left the skin inside the canopy, with a fiberglass fairing all the way around. If I had it to do over again, that's the path I'd take. Kyle Boatright - Kennesaw, GA RV-6 Slider, O-320/Aymar-Demuth ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2000
From: "Martin G. Santic" <martinsan(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: RV-9A HS Main Ribs
I'll answer my own question, "just for the record"! I should of kept going. The forward tabs on the ribs are lower because they fit under the uppper flange of the spar. After assembly of the HS components, it became obvious. Sorry for the false alarm. The skin will not bulge up in this location. The first part finally looks like an airplane part!! There's a bit of excitement here. Marty Santic RV-9A Empennage Davenport, IA "Martin G. Santic" wrote: > > > I am in the process of fluting the main ribs for the horizontal > stabilizer and have noticed that the upper surface of the flange, on the > tab, at the forward end of the rib is a bit lower than the upper surface > of the main flange of the rib. This small height sifference is most > noticable at the 90 degree bend line of the rib's flange (tab and main > flange). Worried that the skin will buldge up a bit at this location. > Is there something I should be doing to alleviate?? > > Marty Santic RV-9A Empennage > Davenport, IA > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2000
From: Chris Good <chrisjgood(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Burlington Bummer
I was hoping to fly to Burlington also. From the Eastern edge of Wisconsin, 670 nm would have been my longest trip, by far. Unfortunately, thunderstorms sweeping across Iowa & Wisconsin prevented us from leaving on Friday. Today, fog made an early start impossible. I'll put it in my calendar for next year. By midday today the fog was clearing & the ceilings were up to 800-1000 ft, so I decided to do some solo IFR work. The flight went perfectly for about 45 seconds! The EIS-4000 Big Red Light started flashing at me just as I entered the clouds. It was complaining about 12.1 volts, leading to my first thought that I must have lost the alternator. I was just about to hit the PTT to tell ATC & request vectors for an approach back in to West Bend when I realized that maybe I had too much load on Van's 35 Amp alternator. I had everything powered on! Landing & taxi lights, nav & strobes, fuel boost pump & pitot heat. Too much! Landing & taxi lights aren't much use in the clouds, so I switched them off & everything returned to normal. Maybe I need a bigger alternator, but here are the figures: Normal load including strobes & nav lights: 20.1 amps Fuel boost pump: 1.5 amps Landing light & taxi light 8.0 amps Pitot heat 8.0 amps --------------- 37.6 amps For required IFR equipment, FAR 91.205 specifies"Generator or alternator of adequate capacity". 35 amps is adequate if I switch off the landing & taxi lights. Actually, 12.1 volts probably indicates that the alternator was holding the load, just not putting much of a charge into the battery. I normally indicate 11.7 volts before starting the engine. BTW, the Navaid wing leveller moved the rest of the IFR practice from ugly to OK. I still had to chase altitude a couple of times, & blew the first approach into Waukesha, having to go missed soon after the FAF. The second approach was better, but I still didn't see the ground before going missed. My final localizer approach to West Bend ended up at MDA (600 ft AGL) in broken clouds, & I was glad to see the runway & land. An hour in the clouds without the wing leveller would have been more than stressful! The ceiling had been forecast to rise, not lower :-( ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brent Redding" <vredding(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: RV FOR SALE
Date: Sep 23, 2000
hi bart could you send me a list of everything additional you have for sale with the 8 and also a price on the other engine that you mentioned in our ph. conversation. willing to take it all if the price is right. brent redding 860-2283 ----- Original Message ----- From: sue gregor <hailey67(at)hotmail.com> Sent: September 23, 2000 12:28 PM Subject: RV-List: RV FOR SALE > > RV8 QUICK BUILD KIT FOR SALE WITH OR WITHOUT ENGINE AND ENGINE ACCESSORIES. > INTERESTED PARTIES PLEASE REPLY OFF RV LIST. THANK YOU. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: SportAV8R(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 23, 2000
Subject: Re: Private airstrip deal
>>Hi Bill: I've got a plan in the back of my mind to put in a strip on some of my 20 acre farm. Sounds like you're advocating "just do it", which is exactly what a neighbor of mine did with a strip for his Luscombe. If you have any other words of wisdom, I'd be interested in hearing them also. Thanks, Doug Seward<< Doug: I'd be careful. Just "doing it" might run you afoul of the law, and make it hard to backtrack and get the official blessing you will probably need later on. I don't agree with the erosion of reasonable private property rights which has occurred in the last several decades, but it's the present reality. Eco-terrorists and power-giddy local governments aren't going away any time soon. My stance is that the county could say nothing at all if I took the wings off my airplane, made it into an air-car, and proceeded to do high-speed taxi all over the farm. There's nothing they could say, any more than they could object to my 14 year old driving an automobile on my private property; no ordinance is being broken. And having put the wings back on, the moment I leave the ground and take flight, I am subject only to federal law; the county and state do not regulate aircraft in flight. Furthermore, the minimum altitude flight restrictions do not apply to aircraft taking off or landing. So I fail to see how this becomes any of the county's business, or the state's, for that matter. The curious thing is that the Feds, who could really have helped us here by exerting their pre-emption authority, have opted to sit back and let the state and local governments wield (unjust) authority over aircraft operations. As any ham radio operator can attest, the Feds are quite able to come to their aid in fighting restrictive antenna tower ordinances, by means of the federal pre-emption doctrine. That they do so proves it does work. But in the area of aviation, you get no such support from the FAA. On the contrary, they will not approve a private airstrip at the federal level until you submit proof that the blessing of the local, county, and state governments has been obtained first. And in case the feds accidentally give premature approval without the requisite permission from lower down, the paperwork from OKC clearly indicates that federal approval does not supercede approval at other levels of local government. In short, they leave you, the landowner-pilot, at the mercy of every level of beaurocracy that exists where you live in order to excercise the privilege of flight which is licensed at the federal level. IMO, only a Democrat could admire anything about this system in its present form; you have pitifully few property-owner rights left. You still have the right to pay property taxes, of course. Might as well give up private ownership of your land and let government make all your decisions for you, cradle to grave. On the bright side, it is still possible to submit to the process, abide the long delays, grease the right palms (all levels of government have their hands in your pocket wanting fees for this and that) and in the end come out with a licensed and duly-authorized piece of hayfield where you can kiss the tires of your RV back onto terra firma without worrying that the sheriff might show up at your door asking questions. My airstrip straddles 2 counties, and the county which lays claim to the final 500 feet made it clear I was going to have to play their game, too. County A, wherein I reside, and which has about 1600 freet of my strip, was cooperative and cheap: 35 bucks in fees and one public hearing. Adjoining County B wanted $225 to bless my "over-run" and held two public hearings, after sending certified letters to all my neighbors, just as county A had done a few months before. County A is rural, county B is a bedroom community for a large city and fancies itself as something special; they have an attitude to go with it. Point is, you have to do every last little thing "they" say you have to do; but if you were a free man, you wouldn't have to do any of it. If I sound like a militia member or conspiracy wacko, I'm not. But this airstrip subject is close to my heart (and home). I think this might be of general list interest, so will post there as well as replying direct to you. Regards, Bill Boyd RV-6A O-320/Sensenich FP Hop-Along Air Field, 12VA Clifton Forge, VA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Luster" <rlluster(at)msn.com>
"RV-List Digest Server"
Subject: Got my wings
Date: Sep 23, 2000
HI all. Very excited to start the inventory process on my just received wing boxes. Vans has done excellent job on their delivering as promised. I am just about done with the left elevator. One thing I did notice, the manual does not reference attaching the hinge to the elevator. The plans do show the proper assembly, but no directions in the manual. I am still very happy with the quality of the kit and look forward to many great hours of building. Richard Luster Marysville, WA RV9A,HS/VS complete # 90111 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RVer273sb(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 24, 2000
Subject: Re: rv4 and landoll balancer
I have the balancer installed on my 4 with the constant speed cowl. Yes you have to remove some of the lip but it remains strong enough. Stewart, RV4 Colo. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 24, 2000
From: Finn Lassen <finnlassen(at)netzero.net>
Subject: Re: Repairman's Certificate
Now that's odd. He's the one that would determine if you qualify, from inspecting your logbook, pictures, etc. That's the understanding I was given by my FAA inspector. AC65-23A, 6. d. Demonstrate to the certificating FAA inspector his or her ability to perform condition inspections ... Maybe you can get a statement from the DAR to that effect and mail that in with the application. Anyway, browse the faa.gov website and see if you can find AC65-23A (and appendix 1). There's an example of what needs to be filled in on the 8610-2 form. You're applying for REPAIRMAN (Experimental Aircraft Builder) cert. Fill in section I. In section III, under TYPE WORK PERFORMED (Example by me:) Make - Finn Lassen Van's Aircraft Model - RV-3 Serial - #488 Certification Date of Aircraft: August 10, 2000 Sign and date in section IV. Send to "local FAA office". Finn Dave Bristol wrote: > My DAR said that the feds had to handle it, that he couldn't. > > Dave > > Finn Lassen wrote: > > > > > The DAR should (have) handle(d) it for you. > > > > Time limit is before first condition inspection, I think. > > > > Finn > > > > "Owens, Laird" wrote: > > > > > > > > Ok, dumb question time. > > > > > > When I had my RV inspected (in late May) for it's air worthiness certificate, the inspector looked at my construction logs and photos. During the confusion of the day, I forgot to ask how to go about getting my repairmans cert.... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rick Osgood" <randbosgood(at)peoplepc.com>
Subject: RV6A Project for sale
Date: Sep 24, 2000
Listers, Health, money and other factors force me to part with my RV6A project. The tail and wings are done, fuselage (sliding canopy version) is approx. 50% done and is still on the jig. The wings are equipped with the Duckworth lights and are prewired for antennas. In addition I have a Valcom radio, some instruments and a completed RST intercom to be included in the total package. All parts are primed and built to plans. I would consider the quality of the work to be good, no skimping. I have invested over 14k to date but will take 10k for all (including tools). I would prefer to sell all to one party and not part the kit out. Please contact me off list for more info. I am located in Minneapolis, MN (952) 448-1685 home phone # Rick Osgood ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 24, 2000
From: Arthur Glaser <airplane(at)megsinet.net>
Subject: Re: Repairman's Certificate
I got my repairman certificate for my last experimental about 17 years ago. At that time, you simply went to the FAA after your test period was flown off and made out the application. Approval appeared to be just about automatic. It is a long time to remember, but I believe they gave me a temporary certificate (just like a new pilot certificate) and the permanent one arrived by mail. The procedure may have changed. Finn Lassen wrote: > > Now that's odd. He's the one that would determine if you qualify, from inspecting your logbook, pictures, etc. That's the understanding I was given by my FAA inspector. > > AC65-23A, 6. d. Demonstrate to the certificating FAA inspector his or her ability to perform condition inspections ... > > Maybe you can get a statement from the DAR to that effect and mail that in with the application. > > Anyway, browse the faa.gov website and see if you can find AC65-23A (and appendix 1). There's an example of what needs to be filled in on the 8610-2 form. > > You're applying for REPAIRMAN (Experimental Aircraft Builder) cert. > > Fill in section I. > > In section III, under TYPE WORK PERFORMED (Example by me:) > Make - Finn Lassen Van's Aircraft > Model - RV-3 > Serial - #488 > Certification Date of Aircraft: August 10, 2000 > > Sign and date in section IV. > > Send to "local FAA office". > > Finn > > Dave Bristol wrote: > > > My DAR said that the feds had to handle it, that he couldn't. > > > > Dave > > > > Finn Lassen wrote: > > > > > > > > The DAR should (have) handle(d) it for you. > > > > > > Time limit is before first condition inspection, I think. > > > > > > Finn > > > > > > "Owens, Laird" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, dumb question time. > > > > > > > > When I had my RV inspected (in late May) for it's air worthiness certificate, the inspector looked at my construction logs and photos. During the confusion of the day, I forgot to ask how to go about getting my repairmans cert.... > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rvmils(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 24, 2000
Subject: voltage reg/protector
I need a part # for an auto voltage regulator and I understand Bob N. sells a circuit protector. Not sure on all of this ele stuff and the names, so you have to bare with me. Carey Mills ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DWENSING(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 24, 2000
Subject: Re: Empannage fairings
In a message dated 9/23/00 9:33:18 PM Central Daylight Time, chrisjgood(at)yahoo.com writes: << I just received an empennage fairing for my 6A from Bob at Fairings Etc. Imfairings(at)aol.com >> I also purchased empennage fairing from Bob -- fits very well as received. Have not worked on yet but very pleased with it as starting piece that needs a little work to make it perfect. Dale Ensing Cary Illinois RV-6A O-360 (finishing details) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DWENSING(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 24, 2000
Subject: Re: Repairman's Certificate
In a message dated 9/24/00 10:32:40 AM Central Daylight Time, airplane(at)megsinet.net writes: << I got my repairman certificate for my last experimental about 17 years ago. At that time, you simply went to the FAA after your test period was flown off and made out the application. Approval appeared to be just about automatic. >> Twelve years ago, on my first experimental airplane, I had to go to the FSDO office to get the repairman's certificate. The FAA airframe inspector that did the inspection on the airplane had nothing to do with it. The FSDO person was much more through in the review of my proof of building the plane than the inspector. Dale Ensing Cary Illinois RV-6A O-360 (finishing details) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Mlfred(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 24, 2000
Subject: intersection FUBAR?
Hi all: Les Williams has purchased a set of these parts from us (you may have read his earlier post about the poor fit). So, I have a question: How many of you are actually flying with these parts, and how did they fit? Do you have any input as to what might be the problem here? I'm trying to understand what is happening on this one installation -- the things simply don't seem to fit. About all I can think of is that the axle camber is formed at the extreme end of the tolerance allowance in one direction, but that seems remote to me... Thanks in advance for your help! Please respond directly to me, or at least along with the list response. Check Six! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HCRV6(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 24, 2000
Subject: Re: duckworth interior
In a message dated 9/22/00 4:20:21 PM Pacific Daylight Time, mphill(at)fgi.net writes: << Should the inside of the duckworths light installation be painted or left bare aluminum. Reflectivity tells me not to. What do you think? >> Based on Duckworks suggestion to have a reflective surface inside the top of the light housing to reflect light down for taxi I used aluminum foil tape. I won't know how it will work for another year or so. Harry Crosby Pleasanton, California RV-6, working on canopy installation ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 24, 2000
From: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv(at)teleport.com>
Subject: Re: Repairman's Certificate
DWENSING(at)AOL.COM wrote: > > > In a message dated 9/24/00 10:32:40 AM Central Daylight Time, > airplane(at)megsinet.net writes: > > << I got my repairman certificate for my last experimental about 17 years > ago. At that time, you simply went to the FAA after your test period was > flown off and made out the application. Approval appeared to be just about > automatic. >> > > Twelve years ago, on my first experimental airplane, I had to go to the FSDO > office to get the repairman's certificate. The FAA airframe inspector that > did the inspection on the airplane had nothing to do with it. The FSDO person > was much more through in the review of my proof of building the plane than > the inspector. > > Dale Ensing Cary Illinois > RV-6A O-360 (finishing details) > Since we are telling our experience at getting our repairman's certificates I well tell mine. When the inspector inspected my aircraft he gave me the papers to fill out for the repairman's certificate and gave me the certificate at the same time as the rest of the aircraft paperwork. I don't understand the logic behind waiting tell the test period hours are flown off, what if you need to do some repairs during that time. I really think that you need to apply for it at the time of inspection. And I don't understand why anyone would not do so. Also the inspector that did my aircraft inspection is the same person that signed the repairman's certificate. JSpringer ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 24, 2000
From: Arthur Glaser <airplane(at)megsinet.net>
Subject: Re: Repairman's Certificate
Jerry Springer wrote: > - Jerry, This makes sense to me. Art Glaser > > Since we are telling our experience at getting our repairman's > certificates I well tell mine. When the inspector inspected my > aircraft he gave me the papers to fill out for the repairman's > certificate and gave me the certificate at the same time as the > rest of the aircraft paperwork. I don't understand the logic > behind waiting tell the test period hours are flown off, what if > you need to do some repairs during that time. I really think that > you need to apply for it at the time of inspection. And I don't > understand why anyone would not do so. Also the inspector that did > my aircraft inspection is the same person that signed the repairman's > certificate. > > JSpringer > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 24, 2000
From: Kevin Horton <khorton(at)cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: voltage reg/protector
> >I need a part # for an auto voltage regulator and I understand Bob N. sells a >circuit protector. Not sure on all of this ele stuff and the names, so you >have to bare with me. >Carey Mills > Bob recommends a Standard Autoparts p/n VR166 voltage regulator, which apparently is a common part for Fords. You will also want over voltage protection, if you value your avionics. He sells a crowbar type overvoltage protection module. His catalog is at: http://www.aeroelectric.com/Catalog/catalog.html Info on the over voltage protection module is at: http://www.aeroelectric.com/Catalog/alterntr/alterntr.html#ovm-14 Take care, -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (misc fuselage stuff) Ottawa, Canada http://members.nbci.com/kevinhorton/rv8.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: Repairman's Certificate
Date: Sep 24, 2000
The only thing you need the repairman's certificate is to sign off the annual conditional inspection. The rest you can do anyway. Cy Galley - Editor, B-C Contact! (Click here to visit our Club site at http://www.bellanca-championclub.com) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Springer" <jsflyrv(at)teleport.com> Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2000 12:43 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Repairman's Certificate > > DWENSING(at)AOL.COM wrote: > > > > > > In a message dated 9/24/00 10:32:40 AM Central Daylight Time, > > airplane(at)megsinet.net writes: > > > > << I got my repairman certificate for my last experimental about 17 years > > ago. At that time, you simply went to the FAA after your test period was > > flown off and made out the application. Approval appeared to be just about > > automatic. >> > > > > Twelve years ago, on my first experimental airplane, I had to go to the FSDO > > office to get the repairman's certificate. The FAA airframe inspector that > > did the inspection on the airplane had nothing to do with it. The FSDO person > > was much more through in the review of my proof of building the plane than > > the inspector. > > > > Dale Ensing Cary Illinois > > RV-6A O-360 (finishing details) > > > Since we are telling our experience at getting our repairman's > certificates I well tell mine. When the inspector inspected my > aircraft he gave me the papers to fill out for the repairman's > certificate and gave me the certificate at the same time as the > rest of the aircraft paperwork. I don't understand the logic > behind waiting tell the test period hours are flown off, what if > you need to do some repairs during that time. I really think that > you need to apply for it at the time of inspection. And I don't > understand why anyone would not do so. Also the inspector that did > my aircraft inspection is the same person that signed the repairman's > certificate. > > JSpringer > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ENewton57(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 24, 2000
Subject: control stick mounting
Ok I've looked at the archives and got a couple of different answers. I can't seem to get the bolt in through the bronze (brass?) bushing where the control stick mounts to the control column. Also had to do a little grinding to get the control sticks in the mounts. The bolt called out is a AN 4-27 with a castle nut. Does this mean the bolt rotates in the bushing or should the bushing rotate? In either case I can't get the bolt in the bushing anyway. What is wrong and how do I fix it? Thanks Eric Newton - Long Beach, Mississippi RV-6A N57ME (Reserved) (Fuselage) Eric's RV-6A Construction Page ________________________________________________________________________________
From: N526ms(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 24, 2000
Subject: RV6A- Cowling
Anyone have any experience using camlocks with the S-Cowl for RV6A instead of hinges? If so please let me know how many were used, where used and whether it worked out as alternative. Thanks for the help. Mike ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 24, 2000
From: Arthur Glaser <airplane(at)megsinet.net>
Subject: Re: Repairman's Certificate
Cy is correct. The annual condition inspection requires a Repairman Certificate or an A&P. Cy Galley wrote: > > The only thing you need the repairman's certificate is to sign off the > annual conditional inspection. The rest you can do anyway. > > Cy Galley - Editor, B-C Contact! > (Click here to visit our Club site at
http://www.bellanca-championclub.com) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jerry Springer" <jsflyrv(at)teleport.com> > To: ; > Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2000 12:43 PM > Subject: Re: RV-List: Repairman's Certificate > > > > > DWENSING(at)AOL.COM wrote: > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 9/24/00 10:32:40 AM Central Daylight Time, > > > airplane(at)megsinet.net writes: > > > > > > << I got my repairman certificate for my last experimental about 17 > years > > > ago. At that time, you simply went to the FAA after your test period > was > > > flown off and made out the application. Approval appeared to be just > about > > > automatic. >> > > > > > > Twelve years ago, on my first experimental airplane, I had to go to the > FSDO > > > office to get the repairman's certificate. The FAA airframe inspector > that > > > did the inspection on the airplane had nothing to do with it. The FSDO > person > > > was much more through in the review of my proof of building the plane > than > > > the inspector. > > > > > > Dale Ensing Cary Illinois > > > RV-6A O-360 (finishing details) > > > > > Since we are telling our experience at getting our repairman's > > certificates I well tell mine. When the inspector inspected my > > aircraft he gave me the papers to fill out for the repairman's > > certificate and gave me the certificate at the same time as the > > rest of the aircraft paperwork. I don't understand the logic > > behind waiting tell the test period hours are flown off, what if > > you need to do some repairs during that time. I really think that > > you need to apply for it at the time of inspection. And I don't > > understand why anyone would not do so. Also the inspector that did > > my aircraft inspection is the same person that signed the repairman's > > certificate. > > > > JSpringer > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: control stick mounting
Date: Sep 24, 2000
> >Ok I've looked at the archives and got a couple of different answers. I >can't seem to get the bolt in through the bronze (brass?) bushing where the >control stick mounts to the control column. Also had to do a little >grinding >to get the control sticks in the mounts. The bolt called out is a AN 4-27 >with a castle nut. Does this mean the bolt rotates in the bushing or >should >the bushing rotate? In either case I can't get the bolt in the bushing >anyway. What is wrong and how do I fix it? Thanks > >Eric Newton - Long Beach, Mississippi >RV-6A N57ME (Reserved) (Fuselage) Eric, I had to ream out the bushings with a 1/4" drill bit. I used cutting oil, and clamped the rag protected bushings in a vice. Once the AN4 bolt will slip through without force, the next task is to trim the bushings to length so they are just slightly longer than the stick. The bushing is fixed in place when the nut is tightened down in the final assembly. So, the stick rotates about the bushing/bolt assembly which does not rotate. Polish the outer surface of the bushing to get a nice, smooth, non-binding fit in the stick weldment. You want free motion here, but no excess slop either. This is how it's done in my RV8, but I reckon the -6 follows the same concept. Brian Denk RV8 N94BD ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rquinn1(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 24, 2000
Subject: Re: control stick mounting
Vans calls for reaming the bushing with a 1/4 inch reamer to insure that the bolt fits with little or no play. The reamer worked for us. Rollie & Rod RV6A Finish kit N799RQ (Reserved) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Persyk" <dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: control stick mounting
Date: Sep 24, 2000
-----Original Message----- From: ENewton57(at)AOL.COM <ENewton57(at)AOL.COM> Date: Sunday, September 24, 2000 4:34 PM Subject: RV-List: control stick mounting > >Ok I've looked at the archives and got a couple of different answers. I >can't seem to get the bolt in through the bronze (brass?) bushing where the >control stick mounts to the control column. Also had to do a little grinding >to get the control sticks in the mounts. The bolt called out is a AN 4-27 >with a castle nut. Does this mean the bolt rotates in the bushing or should >the bushing rotate? In either case I can't get the bolt in the bushing >anyway. What is wrong and how do I fix it? Thanks > >Eric Newton - Long Beach, Mississippi >RV-6A N57ME (Reserved) (Fuselage) > Eric's RV-6A >Construction Page It seems as though things have changed considerably from drawing 41R6, to which I built my control assembly. The nut callout and depiction is an AN960-416-416 elastic stop nut; the bolt is an AN4-30A. Perhaps too many builders have misinterpreted the plans in this critical area and a castle nut is now required. I did find that this area required some careful hand work to obtain the desired fits. The idea is: The longest dimension is the gap in the Wd-610A yoke. The brass bushing is filed to be a tight fit into the yoke, thereby precluding rotation when the yoke is compressed by the bolt; and finally the tube on the Wd-612 control stick is the shortest member, and it must be shorter than the bushing. The bushing may require reaming to get the bolt in with the desired fit. Dennis Persyk 6A N600DP O360A1A/Hartzell 0.0 hours Hampshire, IL C38 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "lothar klingmuller" <lothark(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Burlington Bummer: for some
Date: Sep 24, 2000
"lothar klingmuller" Just returned from there and was surprised that 15 RV made it!! The flyers came essentially from the south (Texas and Arizona).. The last one to arrive was Jim Baker in his award-winning 6 slider. He come over this morning all the way from Goodland :-) (~ 30 road miles). Hopefully all the southern flyers got away this Sunday afternoon. Yes, there was ~ 2" snow on the ground this Sunday mooring all the way from Burlington to the Denver area though the sun was just coming out when we arrived via I70 with the earth bound transportation mode. My wife kind of likes the drive (2 1/2 hrs), though I am determined to get my bird flying by the 6th meeting next year. I am just getting tired driving!!! Having been at all of the 5 Burlington fly-ins, I am amazed how this event has blossemed! I would not be surprized to see 100 (make this 101 with mine?!?!!) RV's there next year. It is just a wonderful relaxing atmosphere for RVators, builders, and wannab be's. Mark your calender: next year's Burlington fly-in will be again Lothar, Denver CO|| 6A tip-up|| wiring instrument panel >SO: this year I am geared up to go to Burlington. Previous years: unable >due to lots of other stuff. Look outside. Yes, I can see the house across >the street. But it is a lot greyer than usual. > >Those of you close enough can still DRIVE over. > >GrrrrrrrrRRRRrrrrrr............... > >Clearing by Monday.... > >Michael >RV-4 N232 Suzie Q >In the hanger....................... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 24, 2000
Subject: Re: control stick mounting
In a message dated 9/24/00 2:17:09 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ENewton57(at)AOL.COM writes: << I can't seem to get the bolt in through the bronze (brass?) bushing where the control stick mounts to the control column. Also had to do a little grinding to get the control sticks in the mounts. The bolt called out is an AN 4-27 with a castle nut. Does this mean the bolt rotates in the bushing or should the bushing rotate? In either case I can't get the bolt in the bushing anyway. What is wrong and how do I fix it? >> Any of these close tolerance cases requires reaming by the builder to fit the bolt. -GV (RV-6A N1GV) vanremog(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RGray67968(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 24, 2000
Subject: Re: Question for 6/6A QB/Slider Builders
Kurt, I asked the same question last month. No responses so I resorted to some long (real long) distance phone calls. I assume you have the quick build. I elected to NOT drill between the existing rivets as I thought the area was getting a little "crowded". Instead, I carefully drilled out all offending rivets (12 on each side I recall). No problem and all should go well when the final riveting takes place with the exception of (possibly) having to substitute 1 blind rivet on each side due to lack of bucking bar access. I plan on not making the cut-out for the windscreen, we'll see how it goes. Hope this helps! Rick Gray 6QB (Ohio) drizzle at the Buffalo Farm ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary & Tena Strong" <gstrong(at)uswest.net>
Subject: control stick mounting
Date: Sep 24, 2000
I just mounted mine a couple of weeks ago. According to the Orndorf video, you have to ream out the bushing. He suggests an actual reamer, but since I didn't have one I used a drill bit. Gary S. RV6AQB - working on the rudder pedals -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of ENewton57(at)AOL.COM Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2000 4:14 PM Subject: RV-List: control stick mounting Ok I've looked at the archives and got a couple of different answers. I can't seem to get the bolt in through the bronze (brass?) bushing where the control stick mounts to the control column. Also had to do a little grinding to get the control sticks in the mounts. The bolt called out is a AN 4-27 with a castle nut. Does this mean the bolt rotates in the bushing or should the bushing rotate? In either case I can't get the bolt in the bushing anyway. What is wrong and how do I fix it? Thanks Eric Newton - Long Beach, Mississippi RV-6A N57ME (Reserved) (Fuselage)
Eric's RV-6A Construction Page ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 24, 2000
Subject: electric flap covers
From: "Robert Dickson" <bubba(at)coastalnet.com>
I spent most of the day installing the electric flaps on my Rv-6A QB and am down to fitting the side covers, EF-607 L&R. I'm trimming cardboard to get the basic fit, but I can't figure out what to do about the change in the seat bottom angle. Several comments in the archives indicate to trim the flange off forward of the seat bottom bend and make the shape work. Is this what everyone is doing?The covers, of course, already have a flange bent at the bottom, but it's straight and the edge it's supposed to fit isn't. I'd appreciate any comments y'all would pass my way. Robert Dickson Fayetteville NC RV-6A flap actuator (seeing it move under power is cool!) Bob Barrows 0-360 (ordered), Hartzell CS (ordered) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: " theslumlord" <theslumlord(at)mediaone.net>
Subject: aviation humour
Date: Sep 24, 2000
as much as I enjoy aviation humour, It has no place on the list. The last items from ATC conversations was funny, it was even funny when I heard it 2 years ago! There are many aviation humour sites on the net where you can go. Let's keep this list pure to the intended purpose. By all means use DO NOT ARCHIVE in your text if you don't want what you submit to wind up forever in the archives. Now here is something you can use: Good building tip #5: before securing a shaft or wire with a set screw, drop a piece of lead shot in the hole and you get a custom fit shoe that will assume the contour of the shaft and lock it in place without scoring or marking it! Ralph Bookout, Certified Slumlord 6 finishing ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 24, 2000
From: Danny Holder <holder(at)multipro.com>
Subject: private grass strips
My first posting - I'm interested in setting up a private grass strip at home in Tennessee. What are the proper procedures one has to go through to get things going? name="holder.vcf" filename="holder.vcf" begin:vcard n:Holder;Danny url:www.homestead.com/wittlewattles/index.html adr:;;;;;; version:2.1 email;internet:www.homestead.com/wittlewattles/index.html note:Check this site out for hand-crafted baby rattles fn:Danny Holder end:vcard ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 24, 2000
From: Mike Thompson <grobdriver(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Re-locating Electric Flap Actuation
--- Emrath wrote: > > I'm trying to contact Charlie Oglesby who posted this to the list. I > would > like to see the pictures of this but the site must have been moved. > Will > Charlie contract me off list if you're reading this, please. Does > anyone > else know of where there is a picture of this and further > explanation? The modified electric flap mounting is available from the RV-links page off of Mr. Horton's web site. Here is the URL:
http://www.mnellis.jnet.net/rv-6_page/flap_mod.htm Hope this was what you were looking for... Mike Thompson Austin, TX -6 N140RV (Reserved) Fuselage Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 24, 2000
From: Gary Zilik <zilik(at)bewellnet.com>
Subject: Burlington Bummer; Still a great time.
14 planes managed to make it to Burlington this year. The weather lifted for about two hours on friday and allowed the 14 in. By Sunday morning we still had 14 planes on the field covered with snow and ice. A great time was had by all 56 of us on Saturday. Dana Boucher gave a great forum on the ins and outs of aircraft insurance and also being an air traffic controller Dana answered many questions about how the ATC system works. Later in the day we hauled John Stewart's Award winning RV-6A into the main hangar and decowled it for a question and answer session. Despite the weather we had a great time. Gary Zilik ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "edperry64" <edperry64(at)netzero.net>
Subject: Manual aileron trim
Date: Sep 24, 2000
Anybody have any comments on the manual aileron trim for the RV-8? I just installed mine(not flying yet). It seems to drag on the smoothness of the controls. Not binding just not smooth. Is this noticeable in flight? Just curious, Ed Perry RV-8QB 180/CS edperry64(at)netzero.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 24, 2000
From: Wayne and Cindy <rwayne(at)gamewood.net>
Subject: Sequence of building
Dear RV8ers: I'm trying to determine the order of events as I progress. As I finish cabin details many things start to hide or block others. I don't want to repeat any steps where possible (assemble/disassemble). It looks like I will need to go to the airport to do my first wing fitting since both wings need to go on at the same time. I want to do this towards the end, if possible. (My shop is not big enough for both wings.) What do you think of the following order? Get on gear Hang engine Determine location of all firewall components Remove engine, begin firewall Paint interior Reinstall cabin components and controls/ pushrods Permanently install rudder pedals/cables and brakes (already built) Run all cabin aluminum lines Complete buses and electrical wiring Install instruments Run all vacuum components Rivet top skin Install canopy (frame already on), then skirt To airport to fit wings to fuselage and cut fairings (Return to shop) Reinstall engine Complete engine systems installation Install cowling Install gear leg fairings Reinstall empennage Paint exterior Return to airport for wing and control surface installation Complete wiring related to wing systems Rivet in floor Thanks for your input. Wayne Williams Danville, VA RV-8A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MOOREWAR(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 24, 2000
Subject: rv4 and Landoll balancer
Thanks for info, I'll start trimming away -- after the canopy, how hard could it be!! Warren Moore. Huntington Beach, ca. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "rvpilot" <rvpilot(at)coollink.net>
Subject: Re: CP RPM
Date: Sep 24, 2000
Hi Joe, The procedure is to back out the high RPM stop on the gov. so that it is not controlling or limiting the RPM. Then back out the mechanical low pitch stop screw on the prop hub so that you get about 2650 to 2700 static or during the initial take off roll. In this condition, the RPM will definitely over speed if you let it (once your airspeed builds up) so be ready to pull back the prop control to 2700 as required. Once you level out, set the RPM for 2700 and leave it there. After you land, pull off the cowling and with the Gov. still where you set it, turn in the high RPM stop screw until it just touches the arm on the Gov. Re-safety it.You're done! Missed you at the Crystal River get -together on Saturday. Best Regards, Bill N48WD ----- Original Message ----- From: "joe wiza" <jwiza1(at)yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2000 7:11 PM Subject: RV-List: CP RPM > > I have an 0360A1D with hertzel cp and woodward Gov > (Prop and Gov from Vans)I've been pleased with the > acft performance. However I get 2500 rpm on take and > climb upon, lowering the nose the rpm runs up to 2700 > rpm. I metioned this to an AE and he said as long as > im satisfied leave it alone because if the rpm gets to > 2700 in climb it will exceed red line when leaveling > out. What say you engine prop guru's out there. Thanks > ahead for any info. do not archieve > > RV6A 100 hrs and climbing > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 24, 2000
From: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv(at)teleport.com>
Subject: Re: private grass strips
Danny Holder wrote: > > > My first posting - I'm interested in setting up a private grass strip at > home in Tennessee. What are the proper procedures one has to go through > to get things going? > > Danny I grew up with an airstrip on my dads property so I know how neat and convenient it can be. I think that the only way to really find out how to do it is to either just go ahead and do it and see what happens. Most likely you well have to go to the county that you live in and jump through all the hoops they want you to. It would be pretty hard to find a correct answer here because each state and county well be different. The FAA well most likely leave it up to the locals to give their approval first before they do. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: AV8TURDON(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 24, 2000
Subject: Re: aviation humour
The way I see it is we don't need another damn List monitor. We've had a lot of fun building and laughing. Beat it. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 24, 2000
From: Larry Olson <lolson(at)doitnow.com>
Subject: Tach Drive Cover
Hi Guys, Seems to me I remember a thread a while back on tach drive covers. I need one for my Lycoming 0320. If there are still some out there please contact me off list. Thanks... Larry Olson Cave Creek, AZ RV6 - Firewall Forward ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 24, 2000
From: Dave Bristol <bj034(at)lafn.org>
Subject: Re: control stick mounting
> Brian, > If the bushing does not rotate about the bolt, then there is no reason to ream > the bushing to .0005 tollerance as called for in the plans (RV6). I think that > you'll find that the bushing should be tight in the stick assembly and rotate > around the bolt. Also if the bushing were supposed to rotate in the stick, > then the stick assembly would have to be reamed to fit the bushing. Dave Brian Denk wrote: > > I had to ream out the bushings with a 1/4" drill bit. I used cutting oil, > and clamped the rag protected bushings in a vice. Once the AN4 bolt will > slip through without force, the next task is to trim the bushings to length > so they are just slightly longer than the stick. The bushing is fixed in > place when the nut is tightened down in the final assembly. So, the stick > rotates about the bushing/bolt assembly which does not rotate. Polish the > outer surface of the bushing to get a nice, smooth, non-binding fit in the > stick weldment. You want free motion here, but no excess slop either. > > This is how it's done in my RV8, but I reckon the -6 follows the same > concept. > > Brian Denk > RV8 N94BD > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 24, 2000
From: "Charles L. Cotton" <charles(at)cottonfamily.com>
Subject: RV Building Pert Chart
"Charles L. Cotton" RV'ers: I'm in the process of setting up to build an RV-9A (purchase tools, prepare shop, etc.) and am trying to plan ahead as much as possible. Many decisions, preliminary at least, have been made concerning the panel, engine, prop, even the paint type and color. The project will go much smoother if the "I should have done it differently," or "I never thought of that" moments are kept to a minimum. I decided to start a pert chart to remove as many surprises from the building process as possible. With pen and paper, I started listing the things I thought were the various decisions/acquisitions that should be made at certain times to avoid delays. Then I realized this was truly like the blind leading the blind. I haven't built an RV before, so I'm hardly qualified to create this list, at least not beyond the fairly obvious items none of us needed to reduce to writing. This is where the experienced builders can help us all, not just those of us who are working on the empennage. You don't have to be flying your RV to contribute. Your experiences will benefit anyone who is not quite as far along in their project. (Remember the old joke, you don't have to be able to out run the bear, just your buddy?) There are other sources for construction tips such as the Frank Justice's Supplemental Instructions and Bunny's Guide to RV Building, so I'm thinking more along the lines of decisions that should be made by a certain point in construction. As an example, I don't know what I want to do about wing tips and I thought I didn't have to worry about it, until well into the wing kit. However, I've seen the threads on the wing tips with the landing lights and like that better than cutting the leading edge of the wing. However, the wing tips I've seen appear to require that I have the tail light in the rudder, because the wing tip strobe does not appear like it will be visible from the rear. Thus, I need to make a decision about the wing tips even before I buy the first kit! This is the type of delay/problem we all would like to avoid. If there is any interest, I would be happy to collect all responses/suggestions and post them on my web page under the title "RV Builders Pert Chart." A proposed organizational format tracking the order in which kits are purchased would be: General - For pre-construction matters/suggestions, or those not directly related to any particular stage of construction; Empennage Kit - (May be further subdivided into H. Stab., elevator; S. Stab., rudder Wing Kit - (May be further subdivided into fuel tanks, lights, ailerons, wing tips, etc.) Fuselage Kit - (Further subdivision is virtually limitless) Finishing Kit - (I don't know enough about finishing kits to say any more!) What do you think folks? Regards, Chas. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6bldr(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: electric flap covers
Date: Sep 24, 2000
Robert, Trim the flange off where the change in angle starts. In fact, you will have to do some more trimming of the cover where the trimmed off flange was to make it fit the change in angle. Another tip for the side cover....use your edge tool to put a little bend on the front and rear edge of the covers. Makes them lay down very nicely and also gives them flimsy things a little more rigidity. Jerry Calvert Edmond Ok -6 fuselage ----- Original Message ----- From: Robert Dickson <bubba(at)coastalnet.com> Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2000 7:05 PM Subject: RV-List: electric flap covers > > I spent most of the day installing the electric flaps on my Rv-6A QB and am > down to fitting the side covers, EF-607 L&R. I'm trimming cardboard to get > the basic fit, but I can't figure out what to do about the change in the > seat bottom angle. Several comments in the archives indicate to trim the > flange off forward of the seat bottom bend and make the shape work. Is this > what everyone is doing?The covers, of course, already have a flange bent at > the bottom, but it's straight and the edge it's supposed to fit isn't. I'd > appreciate any comments y'all would pass my way. > > Robert Dickson > Fayetteville NC > RV-6A flap actuator (seeing it move under power is cool!) > Bob Barrows 0-360 (ordered), Hartzell CS (ordered) > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Vince Welch" <vwelch(at)knownet.net>
Subject: Re: aviation humour
Date: Sep 24, 2000
I disagree. Sometimes things can get just a little too dry and a little bit of humor has its place. Lighten up slumlord. Vince Welch RV-8A Wings Roaming Shores, Ohio ----- Original Message ----- From: " theslumlord" <theslumlord(at)mediaone.net> Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2000 8:14 PM Subject: RV-List: aviation humour > > as much as I enjoy aviation humour, It has no place on the list. The last > items from ATC conversations was funny, it was even funny when I heard it 2 > years ago! There are many aviation humour sites on the net where you can > go. Let's keep this list pure to the intended purpose. By all means use DO > NOT ARCHIVE in your text if you don't want what you submit to wind up > forever in the archives. > Now here is something you can use: Good building tip #5: before securing a > shaft or wire with a set screw, drop a piece of lead shot in the hole and > you get a custom fit shoe that will assume the contour of the shaft and lock > it in place without scoring or marking it! > Ralph Bookout, Certified Slumlord > 6 finishing > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: Sequence of building
Date: Sep 24, 2000
Wayne, Sequence looks pretty good, but I'd suggest two changes. First, the manual calls for riveting the two rear floor skins in way earlier, and I'd suggest doing it before painting the interior. Second, paint the empennage off the fuselage before installing it for the second and last time -- small things are easier to paint than large ones, especially painting the bottom of the HS when mounted. FWIW, Randy Lervold RV-8, #80500, sanding, sanding, and more sanding www.rv-8.com Home Wing VAF Dear RV8ers: I'm trying to determine the order of events as I progress. As I finish cabin details many things start to hide or block others. I don't want to repeat any steps where possible (assemble/disassemble). It looks like I will need to go to the airport to do my first wing fitting since both wings need to go on at the same time. I want to do this towards the end, if possible. (My shop is not big enough for both wings.) What do you think of the following order? Get on gear Hang engine Determine location of all firewall components Remove engine, begin firewall Paint interior Reinstall cabin components and controls/ pushrods Permanently install rudder pedals/cables and brakes (already built) Run all cabin aluminum lines Complete buses and electrical wiring Install instruments Run all vacuum components Rivet top skin Install canopy (frame already on), then skirt To airport to fit wings to fuselage and cut fairings (Return to shop) Reinstall engine Complete engine systems installation Install cowling Install gear leg fairings Reinstall empennage Paint exterior Return to airport for wing and control surface installation Complete wiring related to wing systems Rivet in floor Thanks for your input. Wayne Williams Danville, VA RV-8A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steven DiNieri" <capsteve(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Tach Drive Cover
Date: Sep 25, 2000
I think George Orndorf has them. Steven DiNieri .com> Hi Guys, Seems to me I remember a thread a while back on tach drive covers. I need one for my Lycoming 0320. If there are still some out there please contact me off list. Thanks... Larry Olson Cave Creek, AZ RV6 - Firewall Forward ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2000
From: Frank and Dorothy <frankv(at)infogen.net.nz>
Subject: Re: RV Building Pert Chart
"Charles L. Cotton" wrote: > I decided to start a pert chart to remove as many surprises from the > building process as possible. With pen and paper, I started listing the > things I thought were the various decisions/acquisitions that should be > made at certain times to avoid delays. Then I realized this was truly like > the blind leading the blind. I haven't built an RV before, so I'm hardly > qualified to create this list, at least not beyond the fairly obvious items > none of us needed to reduce to writing. Chas, Most of us haven't built an RV before! One point to think about regarding lead times and decision points... some lead times are in terms of building hours, and others are in terms of real time. For example, deciding when to order the wing kit... there's a (fairly) constant lead time that Vans publishes. There's also a (fairly) constant time to ship parts from Vans to the builder (this will vary depending on the builder's location). You need to have an idea of your average build hours per week. When the building weeks left on the empennage gets down to (Van's lead time + shipping time), you need to order your empennage. Perhaps it might be worth putting together a spreadsheet (I suggest Excel format) which can be used as the builder's log and also provide the Pert functions you suggest. Incidentally, my "Build Time" Web page http://fly.to/bunnysguide/btime.htm was intended as a rudimentary start in the direction of your Pert chart. Feel free to use anything from it that you might find useful in generating your Pert page. > As an > example, I don't know what I want to do about wing tips and I thought I > didn't have to worry about it, until well into the wing kit. However, I've > seen the threads on the wing tips with the landing lights and like that > better than cutting the leading edge of the wing. However, the wing tips > I've seen appear to require that I have the tail light in the rudder, > because the wing tip strobe does not appear like it will be visible from > the rear. Not true... there are strobe/nav wingtip combinations that ensure the strobe (and a white light) will be visible to the rear. Have a look at the lighting options in Vans catalog. Secondly, you can exchange your rudder bottom fairing with Vans for the other style at some small freight cost if you live reasonably close. Frank. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Linzel Gray Civ 43CES/CECP <Gray.Linzel(at)pope.af.mil>
Subject: RE: RV3-List: re:trim control
Date: Sep 25, 2000
Linzel Gray Civ 43CES/CECP I built my bare bones rv3 in 18 months. I averaged about 3 hours a day 7 days a week of construction time. I built mine from a complete kit from vans that I recieved in 1994. Maybe one of the last ones shipped before the production hold. My kit cost $6,500. Mine has no paint and a partial electrical system, starter, batery, selonoid switch, push button starter. I have a gravity feed fuselage tank with no fuel pumps. No lights and no radios. It has a Sterba 68X72 prop that yields very low RPMs on takeoff but tops out at 2750 RPM and about 215 top speed at almost any altitude. Gray Linzel 300+ hours RV3 -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Stewart [mailto:bruces(at)shoalhaven.net.au] Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 11:21 PM Subject: Re: RV3-List: re:trim control --> RV3-List message posted by: Bruce Stewart OK got it thanks to all. Whats next? do I get divorsed now or do I add ammenities to the shed for the day I chucked out =:o) !!!! It seems that the average build time here in OZ is any thing between 1 year and 10+! how much time did you guys take to build? Bruce >Bruce- > >On the newer plans (1984+) the placement of the elevator trim lever is >difficult to see (going by the preview plans). It is on drawing 25 left >side view, section D-D. Drawing 27 gives the attachment details. > >On the older plans (pre-1984) the elevator trim lever placement is easier to >see (full size plans anyway?) on drawing 16 left side view and the section >J-J detail shows the actual lever and not just the cutout per the newer >plans. Drawing 20 gives the attachment details (differ from the newer >plans). > >Hope that helps? > >RV-3's forever! > >Rob Reece >RV-3 SN45 "total rebuild" project > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Bruce Stewart" <bruces(at)shoalhaven.net.au> >To: >Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 5:19 PM >Subject: RV3-List: re:trim control > > >> --> RV3-List message posted by: Bruce Stewart >> >> Hi All, >> >> I've been pouring over the pre view set and I can't see where exactly >> the trim control (lever) is installed? (not on the drawings I got anyway). >> >> ??? >> >> Thanks >> Bruce >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2000
From: Mike Thompson <grobdriver(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: private grass strips
--- Jerry Springer wrote: > > Danny Holder wrote: > > > > > > My first posting - I'm interested in setting up a private grass > strip at > > home in Tennessee. What are the proper procedures one has to go > through > > to get things going? > > > > > > > Danny I grew up with an airstrip on my dads property so I know how > neat and convenient it can be. > I think that the only way to really find out how to do it is to > either just go ahead and do it and see what happens. Hah! Good answer! I know nothing of Tenn. but I do know this: 'Tis easier to get forgiveness than to get permission! A tip though - talk with the neighbors. If they're happy about it, especially those under the general take off direction, that's all that matters. Mike Thompson Austin, TX -6 N140RV (Reserved) Fuselage Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Manual aileron trim
Date: Sep 25, 2000
> >Anybody have any comments on the manual aileron trim for the RV-8? I just >installed mine(not flying yet). It seems to drag on the smoothness of the >controls. Not binding just not smooth. >Is this noticeable in flight? > >Just curious, >Ed Perry >RV-8QB 180/CS >edperry64(at)netzero.net > Ed, Yes, it does add some tension to the stick but you won't notice it in flight. I suppose if you got used to flying the plane without the trim springs, it would take some getting used to once the trim was installed. But, since you're starting off with it in place, well, you get the point. I had to ream out the plastic rod bearing so the rod would slide properly without binding. Just one of those things that needs some fine tuning. The secret to getting the stick to feel balanced is in the rigging of the ailerons. As long as the ailerons are rigged properly for hands off, wings level flight, the spring tension will feel uniform. Brian Denk RV8 N94BD plane pictured in two newspapers AND the evening news. *grin* ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: control stick mounting
Date: Sep 25, 2000
> > > Brian, > > > If the bushing does not rotate about the bolt, then there is no reason >to ream > > the bushing to .0005 tollerance as called for in the plans (RV6). I >think that > > you'll find that the bushing should be tight in the stick assembly and >rotate > > around the bolt. Also if the bushing were supposed to rotate in the >stick, > > then the stick assembly would have to be reamed to fit the bushing. > >Dave Dave, Yes, this could work....however....*drumroll*... With bushing fixed tight into the stick, thus rotating in assembly about the bolt, the torque applied upon the nut will be very critical so as not to squeeze the control column against the bushing...thus locking the bushing/stick assembly in place. Plane won't fly like that. With the bearing locked in place via the properly torqued and safetied nut, the stick will swing freely. Now I do recall that the stick had to be reamed out a bit to rotate about the bushing. Not very much, but I think the welding operation caused a slight bit of distortion which was cleared up nicely with a few passes of a drill bit. Brian Denk ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2000
From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: RV Building Pert Chart
Charles, Let me suggest you spend some time with my construction log. Even though I built a RV-6, the construction sequences will be similar and you will get an overview of what gets built when. The pert list will not really be necessary until you get to the finishing stage. The airframe construction is rather straight forward and you basically just follow the instructions and plans regardless of the individual tweaks you will add later. I well remember the eagerness with which I approached my project and the desire to get everything "nailed down" at the onset of construction. However, you can't do it. Too many options will be presented to you between now and the conclusion of the project, many of which have not even hit the market yet! Just get started building, continue your research as you build, and everything will fall into place as you go. Here is the URL: http://home.HiWAAY.net/~sbuc/journal/rv6.html Good luck with your project! Sam Buchanan "The RV Journal" http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal ========================== "Charles L. Cotton" wrote: > > > RV'ers: > > I'm in the process of setting up to build an RV-9A (purchase tools, prepare > shop, etc.) and am trying to plan ahead as much as possible. Many > decisions, preliminary at least, have been made concerning the panel, > engine, prop, even the paint type and color. The project will go much > smoother if the "I should have done it differently," or "I never thought of > that" moments are kept to a minimum. > > I decided to start a pert chart to remove as many surprises from the > building process as possible. With pen and paper, I started listing the > things I thought were the various decisions/acquisitions that should be > made at certain times to avoid delays. Then I realized this was truly like > the blind leading the blind. I haven't built an RV before, so I'm hardly > qualified to create this list, at least not beyond the fairly obvious items > none of us needed to reduce to writing. > > This is where the experienced builders can help us all, not just those of > us who are working on the empennage. You don't have to be flying your RV to > contribute. Your experiences will benefit anyone who is not quite as far > along in their project. (Remember the old joke, you don't have to be able > to out run the bear, just your buddy?) There are other sources for > construction tips such as the Frank Justice's Supplemental Instructions and > Bunny's Guide to RV Building, so I'm thinking more along the lines of > decisions that should be made by a certain point in construction. As an > example, I don't know what I want to do about wing tips and I thought I > didn't have to worry about it, until well into the wing kit. However, I've > seen the threads on the wing tips with the landing lights and like that > better than cutting the leading edge of the wing. However, the wing tips > I've seen appear to require that I have the tail light in the rudder, > because the wing tip strobe does not appear like it will be visible from > the rear. Thus, I need to make a decision about the wing tips even before I > buy the first kit! This is the type of delay/problem we all would like to > avoid. > > If there is any interest, I would be happy to collect all > responses/suggestions and post them on my web page under the title "RV > Builders Pert Chart." A proposed organizational format tracking the order > in which kits are purchased would be: > > General - For pre-construction matters/suggestions, or those not directly > related to any particular stage of construction; > > Empennage Kit - (May be further subdivided into H. Stab., elevator; S. > Stab., rudder > > Wing Kit - (May be further subdivided into fuel tanks, lights, ailerons, > wing tips, etc.) > > Fuselage Kit - (Further subdivision is virtually limitless) > > Finishing Kit - (I don't know enough about finishing kits to say any more!) > > What do you think folks? > > Regards, > Chas. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Bower" <rvbuilder(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Aligning wing l.e. ribs
Date: Sep 25, 2000
On his video, George Orndorff used threaded rods, washers, and nuts through the tooling holes of his wing leading edge ribs to keep them in alignment with one another while drilling the skins. This seems to be a good method, but I can't find 1/4" threaded rod in the length I need. Would it be acceptable to drill out the forward tooling holes to 3/8" (the size I have)? Also, since I have the newer pre-punched skins, this whole thing might be overkill. Obviously, keeping those ribs in perfect alignment is necessary when marking the inside of the skins for drilling, but that's not needed on my skins. Jim Bower St. Louis, MO RV-6A N143DJ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Im7shannon(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 25, 2000
Subject: Re: private grass strips
Hi Danny, check the archives for the last couple of weeks, I just asked that same question and got several good responses. It looks like you get FAA approval first, then go to the State and county. Good luck Kevin -9A waiting for fuse ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Aligning wing l.e. ribs
Date: Sep 25, 2000
> > >On his video, George Orndorff used threaded rods, washers, and nuts through >the tooling holes of his wing leading edge ribs to keep them in alignment >with one another while drilling the skins. This seems to be a good method, >but I can't find 1/4" threaded rod in the length I need. Would it be >acceptable to drill out the forward tooling holes to 3/8" (the size I >have)? > Also, since I have the newer pre-punched skins, this whole thing might >be >overkill. Obviously, keeping those ribs in perfect alignment is necessary >when marking the inside of the skins for drilling, but that's not needed on >my skins. > > >Jim Bower >St. Louis, MO >RV-6A N143DJ > Jim, I tried the threaded rod technique, but it turned out to be more trouble than it was worth. Just my experience here, it may work fine for others. Anyway, I placed masking tape over the rib flanges and removed the inside plastic film on the skins so they would slide somewhat easier on each other. I used a four foot length of broomstick with a screw half inserted in the end and bent at 90 degrees. This was used to prod the ribs into alignment with the rivet holes so the sharpie pen marked rib flange centers could be seen through the holes. Start drilling from the top, aft edge of the skin and work your way forward to the leading edge. Adjust the cargo straps so the skin is snug, but still allows the ribs to be tweaked into position. Continue drilling over the leading edge and back to the spar. Stand back, admire your work, and grin. Continue until plane flies. :) Brian Denk RV8 N94BD ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Parsons" <dap(at)DParsons.com>
Subject: private grass strips
Date: Sep 25, 2000
I would suggest you start buy reading FAR PART 157 - NOTICE OF CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, ACTIVATION, AND DEACTIVATION OF AIRPORTS. http://www.faa.gov/avr/AFS/FARS/far-157.txt I did not read the whole thing, and what I did read I was somewhat skimming. >From what I did start reading, I believe there is more to it than just preparing the ground, and then just flying in and out of your property. Also, I think it depends on how much you will be flying in and out. At the very least, I would imagine you would want to make it as a close runway, and you would want it included in the sectional for your area so other pilots at least know to be looking for it and possible air traffic. You should also be listed in the Airport Guide. There are two private strips within 6 miles of my home like the one you want to setup. Both are listed in the Houston Sectional and are in the Airport Guide. If you want to see how they are listed, they are: http://208.165.194.175/mapping/chart/aptrpt.cfm?A=7&id=55T http://208.165.194.175/mapping/chart/aptrpt.cfm?A=7&id=55T Note: These two strips are 2.3 nm apart from each other. Both of these listings give a contact name and phone number. You might try calling them and see if they would be willing to answer some of your questions on what you need to do. Hope this helps.... Don Parsons ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: Aligning wing l.e. ribs
Date: Sep 25, 2000
You can use coupling nuts which are just long nuts to thread together any length you need. Cy Galley - Editor, B-C Contact! (Click here to visit our Club site at http://www.bellanca-championclub.com) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Bower" <rvbuilder(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 9:15 AM Subject: RV-List: Aligning wing l.e. ribs > > On his video, George Orndorff used threaded rods, washers, and nuts through > the tooling holes of his wing leading edge ribs to keep them in alignment > with one another while drilling the skins. This seems to be a good method, > but I can't find 1/4" threaded rod in the length I need. Would it be > acceptable to drill out the forward tooling holes to 3/8" (the size I have)? > Also, since I have the newer pre-punched skins, this whole thing might be > overkill. Obviously, keeping those ribs in perfect alignment is necessary > when marking the inside of the skins for drilling, but that's not needed on > my skins. > > > Jim Bower > St. Louis, MO > RV-6A N143DJ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Phillips" <mphill(at)fgi.net>
Subject: Re: Aligning wing l.e. ribs
Date: Sep 25, 2000
Jim,you can buy a coupling for the threaded rod, I prefer that,easier to manage. Mark E Phillips Williamsville,Illinois ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Bower" <rvbuilder(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 9:15 AM Subject: RV-List: Aligning wing l.e. ribs > > On his video, George Orndorff used threaded rods, washers, and nuts through > the tooling holes of his wing leading edge ribs to keep them in alignment > with one another while drilling the skins. This seems to be a good method, > but I can't find 1/4" threaded rod in the length I need. Would it be > acceptable to drill out the forward tooling holes to 3/8" (the size I have)? > Also, since I have the newer pre-punched skins, this whole thing might be > overkill. Obviously, keeping those ribs in perfect alignment is necessary > when marking the inside of the skins for drilling, but that's not needed on > my skins. > > > Jim Bower > St. Louis, MO > RV-6A N143DJ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Arnold de Brie" <ajdbrie(at)interestate.nl>
Subject: Fw: RV8-List: airflow performance FS
Date: Sep 25, 2000
----- Original Message ----- From: "Arnold de Brie" <ajdbrie(at)interestate.nl> Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2000 9:11 AM Subject: RV8-List: airflow performance FS | --> RV8-List message posted by: "Arnold de Brie" | | I have an Airflow Perforformance system for sale | It has been used for 50 hours on a O 360 A1A | | I acquired a new Lyc IO 360 for my RV8 project and had to restore the other | one in its original state. | | Anyone interested please contact me off list. | | Arnold de Brie | | ajdbrie(at)interestate.nl | | | | | | | ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "kempthornes" <kempthornes(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: RV6A- Cowling
Date: Oct 26, 2000
Hinges are nice cuz they are invisible and aerodynamic ***BUT*** they are not easy to install or use. I can't possibly install the top cowl pins to the curved part of the cowl. For now, I have two hinge pins that run the straight part and two shorties that come up from the bottom corners for the curves. I will replace these with screws or camlocs 1.5 or 2 inches OC. This is a non S cowl. I see no point in putting screws in the straight part as they look like spam..... Hal Kempthorne RV6a N7HK > Anyone have any experience using camlocks with the S-Cowl for RV6A instead of > hinges? If so please let me know how many were used, where used and whether > it worked out as alternative. > Thanks for the help. > Mike ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Lenleg(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 25, 2000
Subject: Re: Canopy Help !!
Listers: I have run into a problem extending the canopy frame forward to the windscreen roll over bar. The sides of the 821 upper skin block its path. I called Vans and they said it will need to be trimmed. I ask where on the plans this was shown but they said ti wasn't on the plans? Did you guys have to trim this skin? Is it a butt joint? HELP !!! Len Leggette, RV-8A North Carolina (N901LL res) Finish Kit ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Ludwig" <ludwig(at)azstarnet.com>
Subject: Throttle quadrant curved cover
Date: Sep 25, 2000
Someone made a curved cover for their throttle quadrant that looked a lot better than leaving it 'uncovered'. Anyone know who did that? I'm searching for the pic. Thanks, Bill in Tucson -8QB, ready for finish kit ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HCRV6(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 25, 2000
Subject: Re: control stick mounting
In a message dated 9/24/00 2:17:09 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ENewton57(at)AOL.COM writes: << I can't seem to get the bolt in through the bronze (brass?) bushing where the control stick mounts to the control column. >> I had the same problem. Called Van's and they said to open it up with a reamer. I did that and it fits snug on the AN4 bolt as it should. The stick is supposed to rotate around the bushing. I also had to file the ends of the bushing housing ( the tube at the end of the stick) a little so that the bushing sticks out just enough on each end so that the bushing gets clamped in the yoke. Hope thats clear and that it helps. Harry Crosby Pleasanton, California RV-6, working on canopy installation ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ENewton57(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 25, 2000
Subject: F-604 Bulkhead Height
I am mounting and lining up the Main Wing Spar Bulkhead (F604) in my fuselage jig. I am trying to get the height of 25.16 inches (from Jig crossbeam to bottom of "V" in bulkhead that the plans call for. The overall length of the bulkhead from the "V" to the top of the side pieces is 24" So logically, the height of my bulkhead is 24 1/8". How do you get the 25.18" and still keep the top longeron against the jig crossmember? Thanks Eric Newton - Long Beach, Mississippi RV-6A N57ME (Reserved) (Fuselage) Eric's RV-6A Construction Page ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "William M. Costello" <WMCEnt(at)enteract.com>
Subject: Tire Special
Date: Sep 25, 2000
Hi Folks, AVWeb is offering a tire special for its readers from Desser. I am not familiar with tire prices, so I don't know how great the prices are. Only good till Oct 1. Those in the market for tires, check out
http://www.desser.com/avweb.html Best regards, Bill Costello wmcent(at)enteract.com Chicago ________________________________________________________________________________
From: SportAV8R(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 25, 2000
Subject: private airstrips
RV community members: There are several approaches one could take to the establishment of a private airstrip: the asking permission approach, and the asking forgiveness approach. I tried a blend of the two, asking permission of the county where most of the runway lies, and ignoring the "minority county." They called me on it, and I had to jump through their hoops anyway. It is my opinion that there is no way to get FAA approval without first satisfying the local government at all levels. If I thought there was any other way, I would have tried. Be forewarned that, IMO, you stand no chance of getting into a database or onto the sectional if you don't register "by the book." Perhaps being unlisted is a good thing? Depends on your purposes. I can say this: a private airstrip is a wonderful thing. In spite of the obstacles to registration, and the cost and labor of constructing and maintianing one, it is so worth it. I am hard pressed to say which I value more: having my own homebuilt plane or my own backyard airstrip. Certainly, the combination of the two is blessing upon blessing. I catch myself enjoying the lawn-mowing chore a bit more than is normal for a man facing housework. Cruising slowly up and down the expansive length of that luxurious green carpet and smelling the bluegrass clippings... aaahhh. Maybe Buster can pen an Ode to the Turf Strip one day (hint.) I would like to propose an idea, a concept. We all know that General Aviation is under pressure from all sides, and that our beloved pursuit of recreational flying hangs in a precarious legislative balance. One stroke of the pen and another GA airport is closed, another expensive and half-baked AD is promulgated, another scenic area closed to overflights, and so on. I've not given this much thought yet, but it seems to me that it would help our cause if there was a general proliferation of private airstrips. This would be doubly true if said airstrips were owned by people with an open heart toward their fellow fliers, if they were readily shared with any and all aviators who had a whim to drop in, and if responsible citizen/neighbors were invited to base a plane or two thereon. If I am correct, then we should all, as many as have an opportunity to do so, be looking for chances to swell the number of private fields dotting the landscape. They may one day be the only places we are welcome in our small planes. And I would encourage all of them to be listed in the RV White Pages, so we know where we are welcome on our cross-country sojourns. Let's dot the sectionals with as many "Circle-R's" as possible. There's a power in numbers that may become our last hope as private aviatiors one day. Enough rambling. Buck those rivets and keep believing it's more than worth it! Bill Boyd RV-6A O-320 Sensenich FP Hop-Along Airfield 12VA Clifton Forge, VA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HCRV6(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 25, 2000
Subject: Re: control stick mounting
In a message dated 9/24/00 8:05:11 PM Pacific Daylight Time, bj034(at)lafn.org writes: << I think that you'll find that the bushing should be tight in the stick assembly and rotate around the bolt. >> I don't mean to start a flap over this but that is not the explanation that I got from Van's. According to what I was told the stick should rotate around the bushing. Maybe Scott McD will chime in on this pretty soon and sort it out. Harry Crosby Pleasanton, California RV-6, working on canopy installation ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Canopy Help !!
Date: Sep 25, 2000
> >Listers: > >I have run into a problem extending the canopy frame forward to the >windscreen roll over bar. The sides of the 821 upper skin block its path. >I >called Vans and they said it will need to be trimmed. I ask where on the >plans this was shown but they said ti wasn't on the plans? > >Did you guys have to trim this skin? Is it a butt joint? HELP !!! > >Len Leggette, RV-8A >North Carolina (N901LL res) >Finish Kit Howdy, Len, Have you recovered from the green chile episode yet? hehe. Yes, you do have to trim back the 821. Make it a close butt joint with the canopy skirt at the forward canopy frame rib. The windshield fairing that you get to glop together with epoxyglass will be extended down to overlay the skirt in the fully closed position. Brian Denk RV8 N94BD ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "kempthornes" <kempthornes(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Sequence of building
Date: Oct 26, 2000
Wayne and Cindy, I think you are in danger of wearing out some of the parts by installing and removing etc. Like, install engine once and be done with it, etc. Maybe I am the one doing it the hard way but I installed the engine then drilled the firewall and ran cables etc. Run the most inflexible things first. I found the control cables to be this but I used a real airplane mixture cable which is stiffer and hard to figure how to fit. Then the fuel line. Then cooling and heating air tubes. Finally, the wiring. Just before you are ready to fly, attach the forward top skin, canopy and windscreen. Hal Kempthorne RV6a N7HK Wayne and Cindy wrote: > What do you think of the following order? > > Get on gear > Hang engine > Determine location of all firewall components > Remove engine, begin firewall > Paint interior > Reinstall cabin components and controls/ pushrods > Permanently install rudder pedals/cables and brakes (already built) > Run all cabin aluminum lines > Complete buses and electrical wiring > Install instruments > Run all vacuum components > Rivet top skin > Install canopy (frame already on), then skirt > To airport to fit wings to fuselage and cut fairings > (Return to shop) > Reinstall engine > Complete engine systems installation > Install cowling > Install gear leg fairings > Reinstall empennage > Paint exterior > Return to airport for wing and control surface installation > Complete wiring related to wing systems > Rivet in floor ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "kempthornes" <kempthornes(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: RV Building Pert Chart
Date: Oct 26, 2000
Just a detailed task list with precedence would be a great help, Chas. Times would be pretty weird coming from different builders etc. hal ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Carl Froehlich" <carlfro(at)erols.com>
Subject: Re: Canopy Help !!
Date: Sep 25, 2000
Len, Trim as needed. This should be about 1/4 inch on the side with more toward the top (top of the aft piece of top skin). The top gets rounded as needed to clear the frame. Keep in mind many people cover this area when they extend the fiberglass (or Kevlar) windscreen fairing down the side below the canopy rails. I'll have about a 1/8 inch clearance between the skin and the canopy fairing on the sides, this joint will be cover for about 1/2 inch by the windscreen fairing (the canopy fairing will slide under the windscreen fairing). Carl Froehlich RV-8A (cowl) Vienna, VA ----- Original Message ----- From: <Lenleg(at)AOL.COM> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 12:06 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Canopy Help !! > > Listers: > > I have run into a problem extending the canopy frame forward to the > windscreen roll over bar. The sides of the 821 upper skin block its path. I > called Vans and they said it will need to be trimmed. I ask where on the > plans this was shown but they said ti wasn't on the plans? > > Did you guys have to trim this skin? Is it a butt joint? HELP !!! > > Len Leggette, RV-8A > North Carolina (N901LL res) > Finish Kit > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2000
From: Jeff Point <jpoint(at)execpc.com>
Subject: Re: Aligning wing l.e. ribs
Jim, I didn't use the rod method at all, it is only really useful for non-prepunched. I just made the lines down the center of the rib flange, then reached in and moved them by hand until the line showed in the skin holes and drilled. Turned out beautifully. For the hard to reach ribs in the middle, get yourself a piece of thick dowel (3/4 inch or so, 2 ft long) and pound a roofing nail in one end, leaving it out a 1/2 inch. This makes a great tool for reaching through lightening holes to move those hard to reach ribs back and forth. Jeff Point -6 wings Milwaukee, WI Jim Bower wrote: > Also, since I have the newer pre-punched skins, this whole thing might be > overkill. Obviously, keeping those ribs in perfect alignment is necessary > when marking the inside of the skins for drilling, but that's not needed on > my skins. > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: control stick mounting
From: pcondon(at)csc.com
Date: Sep 25, 2000
09/25/2000 01:49:26 PM Grasp the bushing with a v-block, squashed in a vise. Reaming took 5 seconds. Besure not to squeez the bushing to tight or otherwise distort it while clamping it. HCRV6(at)AOL.COM@matronics.com on 09/25/2000 12:19:17 PM Please respond to rv-list(at)matronics.com; Please respond to HCRV6(at)AOL.COM Sent by: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com cc: Subject: Re: RV-List: control stick mounting In a message dated 9/24/00 2:17:09 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ENewton57(at)AOL.COM writes: << I can't seem to get the bolt in through the bronze (brass?) bushing where the control stick mounts to the control column. >> I had the same problem. Called Van's and they said to open it up with a reamer. I did that and it fits snug on the AN4 bolt as it should. The stick is supposed to rotate around the bushing. I also had to file the ends of the bushing housing ( the tube at the end of the stick) a little so that the bushing sticks out just enough on each end so that the bushing gets clamped in the yoke. Hope thats clear and that it helps. Harry Crosby Pleasanton, California RV-6, working on canopy installation ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2000
Subject: voltage reg/protector
From: Don Jordan <dons6a(at)juno.com>
I used an external regulated 50 amp alternator from a ford van. P/N 14118. It is large but everyithing else I hunted was also. I will likey build a hump on the cowling. I went from $200.00 to $35.00 with the core charge at Auto Zone. The voltage regulator was a 80 ford Van. P/N was VR749 & cost $10.00. If you use an internal voltage regulator, Bob has diagrams to use relays for the OV protection. Your bring 12 volts from a 15 amp fuse to a 5 amp breaker to the master switch. Why, I have no idea. Looks like one fuse would do it. bob wants the alt circiut to come on & off with the master so I used his 701-2-5. I use a fuse that is not "get to ably" so the breaker can be used in flight to turn off the alternator. Now if something goes wrong, that is post to take the alternator control voltage off lline. Next you install his Over Voltage assembly. I thought I got ripped off when it got here because it is not as big as the 70 amp inline fuse he wants. This thing ties into the wire controlling the voltage Regulator. If it sees an OV it saps the 5a breaker & takes the alternator off line. Next you buy a 70 amp inline fuss between the altenator output to the battery. I wanted it on the alternator, but it is to large. I installed it on the front side of the start relay. Had to redrill the 1/4 hole to 5/16. This would take the alternator out also. The line from the alternator to the start relay & the line from the master relay to the buss is 4 ga. I would use 6 ga, but the wire & connectors were bought. I had to build a copper bar to get from the very large conncetor to the #10 size post on the buss. Same thing with the alternator. I have a #10 stud to connect to a 1/4 hole on the 4 ga. If you havn't been to Bob's course at least by his Book. Its realy good. Don Jordan -- 6A finish -- Arlington, Tx -- dons6a(at)juno.com ********************************************** > > I need a part # for an auto voltage regulator and I understand Bob > N. sells a > circuit protector. Not sure on all of this ele stuff and the names, > so you > have to bare with me. > Carey Mills > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2000
From: Finn Lassen <finnlassen(at)netzero.net>
Subject: RV-3 Wheel shimmey update
As those of you who followed the wheel shimmy thread about a year ago know, I had bad fore-aft shimmy of my wheels at about 20 mph. Tried everything: low tire pressure, balancing wheels, tightening the axle nut. I finally gave in and put on the wood strips as per the manual. As I used too small strips I still had shimmy at 20 mph but acceptable in that I could accelerate and brake through it before it built up. Well, during taxiing and initial first flights I was too heavily on the brakes and wore the right tire down to the tube. I replaced the both tires with recapped (rethreaded?) ones and happened to get the Condor brand. The original McCreary tires from 1977 weighed about 3 pounds, the Condors about 5.5 pounds. Very noticeable difference! Shimmy almost nonexistent now. Although the original tires could have been out of balance, I suspect that the weight is what makes the difference. Finn Request a CDROM 1-800-333-3633 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Bower" <rvbuilder(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Lighting options
Date: Sep 25, 2000
As usual, there are as many lighting options as there are builders! I want to use the flush wingtip-mounted lenses (Van's catalog) because I think they look cool. To this end, I ordered the emp kit with the taillight fairing, and I plan to use a combination tail light/strobe. The problem: Van's 3-strobe light kit uses a single power supply. This seems unpopular because of radio noise and long high-voltage leads. Three power supplies seem heavy and expensive. I would really like to hear some input and ideas from all of you who have been down this road. Thanks in advance for all your good advice. Jim Bower St. Louis, MO RV-6A N143DJ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Joesph Friday" <jammin32123(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: RV 4 Parts on Ebay
Date: Sep 25, 2000
Have many of you gotten much stuff off Ebay? I have had good luck with most everything I have gotten there. There seem to be a few things for RV's at any time. John ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2000
Subject: : F-604 Bulkhead Height
From: Don Jordan <dons6a(at)juno.com>
Eric, its been a while & I am lost from your question. You know the 604 sits on top of the longeron & is tilted forward in the jig for a 1 degree incidence angle. From 25.16 I can take out 3/4 for the longeron ( the 604 sits on top of the longeron in the fixture) & 23 from the side length. That leaves 1.41 inches for the angle portion. I think I made the 25.16 & checked for level across the 604 & drilled the insert pcs to hold that. Don Jordan -- 6A finish -- Arlington, Tx -- dons6a(at)juno.com ********************************************** > > I am mounting and lining up the Main Wing Spar Bulkhead (F604) in my > fuselage > jig. I am trying to get the height of 25.16 inches (from Jig > crossbeam to > bottom of "V" in bulkhead that the plans call for. The overall > length of the > bulkhead from the "V" to the top of the side pieces is 24" So > logically, the > height of my bulkhead is 24 1/8". How do you get the 25.18" and > still keep > the top longeron against the jig crossmember? > Thanks > > Eric Newton - Long Beach, Mississippi > RV-6A N57ME (Reserved) (Fuselage) > Eric's RV-6A > > Construction Page > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "C J Heitman" <cjh(at)execpc.com>
Subject: private airstrips
Date: Sep 25, 2000
<> Bill: I found that it is not necessary to get local approval prior to getting FAA approval. You only need to submit FAA Form 7480-1, "Notice of Landing Area Proposal", to the Airports District Office that handles your area. The purpose of the FAA review is to conduct an airspace study to determine if your proposal will pose a hazard to existing airspace use. I submitted my form to the Minneapolis ADO on 4/11/99 and on 5/24/99 the ADO sent me a letter stating that there were no objections to my proposal. Those that grumble about government interference in their lives should realize that by following this procedure, you are protecting your airstrip from a neighbor who may want to build an airstrip that interferes with yours. There is another private airstrip several miles from mine and the FAA sent the owner a letter asking if he had any objections to my airstrip (he didn't). The state Bureau of Aeronautics (Wisconsin) was very helpful in getting the forms filled out properly and actually forwarded the FAA form to Minneapolis after checking it for errors. I received permission from the state during this same time frame. There were no fees charged by either the state or the feds. All of this was done before ever contacting the local government officials. I think that having the state and federal approvals in hand prior to talking to the local officials helped indicate to them that I was being responsible and made it easier to clear their hurdles. (The local township and county approvals were more of a hassle and did involve some fees but all was accomplished by 9/13/00.) Bill, I also agree that private airstrips are a wonderful thing and I can't hardly wait for my RV to be completed so that I can fully utilize my airstrip. Chris Heitman Heitman Field Dousman WI RV-9A N94ME (reserved) installing wingtip lights, waiting for fuselage
http://www.execpc.com/~cjh/rv9a.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: LessDragProd(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 25, 2000
Subject: Re: RV3-List: RV-3 Wheel shimmey update
In a message dated 09/25/2000 12:19:54 PM Pacific Daylight Time, finnlassen(at)netzero.net writes: > As those of you who followed the wheel shimmy thread about a year ago > know, I had bad fore-aft shimmy of my wheels at about 20 mph. Tried > everything: low tire pressure, balancing wheels, tightening the axle > nut. I finally gave in and put on the wood strips as per the manual. As > I used too small strips I still had shimmy at 20 mph but acceptable in > that I could accelerate and brake through it before it built up. (Snip) > > Finn > Hi Finn, Did you try balancing the wheel pants? Jim Ayers RV-3 N47RV ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2000
From: Danny Holder <holder(at)multipro.com>
Subject: Re: private grass strips
Thanks for the information,,, Danny Im7shannon(at)AOL.COM wrote: > > Hi Danny, check the archives for the last couple of weeks, I just asked that > same question and got several good responses. It looks like you get FAA > approval first, then go to the State and county. > Good luck > Kevin > -9A waiting for fuse > -- name="holder.vcf" filename="holder.vcf" begin:vcard n:Holder;Danny url:www.homestead.com/wittlewattles/index.html adr:;;;;;; version:2.1 email;internet:www.homestead.com/wittlewattles/index.html note:Check this site out for hand-crafted baby rattles fn:Danny Holder end:vcard ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2000
From: Danny Holder <holder(at)multipro.com>
Subject: Re: private airstrips
Thanks for the information!!! Danny SportAV8R(at)AOL.COM wrote: > > RV community members: > > There are several approaches one could take to the establishment of a private > airstrip: the asking permission approach, and the asking forgiveness > approach. I tried a blend of the two, asking permission of the county where > most of the runway lies, and ignoring the "minority county." They called me > on it, and I had to jump through their hoops anyway. > > It is my opinion that there is no way to get FAA approval without first > satisfying the local government at all levels. If I thought there was any > other way, I would have tried. Be forewarned that, IMO, you stand no chance > of getting into a database or onto the sectional if you don't register "by > the book." Perhaps being unlisted is a good thing? Depends on your > purposes. I can say this: a private airstrip is a wonderful thing. In > spite of the obstacles to registration, and the cost and labor of > constructing and maintianing one, it is so worth it. I am hard pressed to > say which I value more: having my own homebuilt plane or my own backyard > airstrip. Certainly, the combination of the two is blessing upon blessing. > I catch myself enjoying the lawn-mowing chore a bit more than is normal for a > man facing housework. Cruising slowly up and down the expansive length of > that luxurious green carpet and smelling the bluegrass clippings... aaahhh. > Maybe Buster can pen an Ode to the Turf Strip one day (hint.) > > I would like to propose an idea, a concept. We all know that General > Aviation is under pressure from all sides, and that our beloved pursuit of > recreational flying hangs in a precarious legislative balance. One stroke of > the pen and another GA airport is closed, another expensive and half-baked AD > is promulgated, another scenic area closed to overflights, and so on. I've > not given this much thought yet, but it seems to me that it would help our > cause if there was a general proliferation of private airstrips. This would > be doubly true if said airstrips were owned by people with an open heart > toward their fellow fliers, if they were readily shared with any and all > aviators who had a whim to drop in, and if responsible citizen/neighbors were > invited to base a plane or two thereon. > > If I am correct, then we should all, as many as have an opportunity to do so, > be looking for chances to swell the number of private fields dotting the > landscape. They may one day be the only places we are welcome in our small > planes. And I would encourage all of them to be listed in the RV White > Pages, so we know where we are welcome on our cross-country sojourns. Let's > dot the sectionals with as many "Circle-R's" as possible. There's a power in > numbers that may become our last hope as private aviatiors one day. > > Enough rambling. Buck those rivets and keep believing it's more than worth > it! > > Bill Boyd > RV-6A O-320 Sensenich FP > Hop-Along Airfield 12VA > Clifton Forge, VA > -- name="holder.vcf" filename="holder.vcf" begin:vcard n:Holder;Danny url:www.homestead.com/wittlewattles/index.html adr:;;;;;; version:2.1 email;internet:www.homestead.com/wittlewattles/index.html note:Check this site out for hand-crafted baby rattles fn:Danny Holder end:vcard ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2000
From: Danny Holder <holder(at)multipro.com>
Subject: Re: private grass strips
Thanks for the word!!!!! Danny Mike Thompson wrote: > > --- Jerry Springer wrote: > > > > Danny Holder wrote: > > > > > > > > > My first posting - I'm interested in setting up a private grass > > strip at > > > home in Tennessee. What are the proper procedures one has to go > > through > > > to get things going? > > > > > > > > > > > > Danny I grew up with an airstrip on my dads property so I know how > > neat and convenient it can be. > > I think that the only way to really find out how to do it is to > > either just go ahead and do it and see what happens. > > Hah! > Good answer! I know nothing of Tenn. but I do know this: > 'Tis easier to get forgiveness than to get permission! > > A tip though - talk with the neighbors. If they're happy about it, > especially those under the general take off direction, that's all that > matters. > > Mike Thompson > Austin, TX > -6 N140RV (Reserved) > Fuselage > > Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. > -- name="holder.vcf" filename="holder.vcf" begin:vcard n:Holder;Danny url:www.homestead.com/wittlewattles/index.html adr:;;;;;; version:2.1 email;internet:www.homestead.com/wittlewattles/index.html note:Check this site out for hand-crafted baby rattles fn:Danny Holder end:vcard ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2000
From: Danny Holder <holder(at)multipro.com>
Subject: Re: private grass strips
Thanks for the information... Danny Jerry Springer wrote: > > Danny Holder wrote: > > > > > > My first posting - I'm interested in setting up a private grass strip at > > home in Tennessee. What are the proper procedures one has to go through > > to get things going? > > > > > > Danny I grew up with an airstrip on my dads property so I know how > neat and convenient it can be. > I think that the only way to really find out how to do it is to > either just go ahead and do it and see what happens. Most likely > you well have to go to the county that you live in and jump > through all the hoops they want you to. It would be pretty hard > to find a correct answer here because each state and county well be > different. The FAA well most likely leave it up to the locals > to give their approval first before they do. > -- name="holder.vcf" filename="holder.vcf" begin:vcard n:Holder;Danny url:www.homestead.com/wittlewattles/index.html adr:;;;;;; version:2.1 email;internet:www.homestead.com/wittlewattles/index.html note:Check this site out for hand-crafted baby rattles fn:Danny Holder end:vcard ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2000
From: joe wiza <jwiza1(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: CP RPM
Thanks all for your suggestions. Well today I did a half dozen take off's and landings. Made no progress (after adjusting the hub screw) except on the last take off I noticed as I applied full throttle the rpm jumped right up to 2700 rpm very briefly then back to 24 to 2500rpm. upon reachin pattern altitude nose down and back up to 2700rpm. Will Check the rpm with and outside gage (Possibly the cable to the tach somehow slips when accelaration is occuring.)When I find the problem I'll try Bill's tech. Thanks again RV6A 100HRS with baffling R'S still smiling. do not archieve ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Greg Tanner" <gtanner(at)bendcable.com>
Subject: Back Riveting
Date: Sep 25, 2000
Is there a quality problem with back riveting as many rivets as are accessible? Does back riveting provide an equal (or better)amount of clamping force as face riveting? Greg Tanner RV-9A Empennage SER #90186 N80BR (APPLIED FOR) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ENewton57(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 25, 2000
Subject: Re: F-604 Bulkhead Height
In a message dated 9/25/00 11:35:02 AM Central Daylight Time, ENewton57(at)AOL.COM writes: << I am mounting and lining up the Main Wing Spar Bulkhead (F604) in my fuselage jig. I am trying to get the height of 25.16 inches (from Jig crossbeam to bottom of "V" in bulkhead that the plans call for. The overall length of the bulkhead from the "V" to the top of the side pieces is 24" So logically, the height of my bulkhead is 24 1/8". How do you get the 25.18" and still keep the top longeron against the jig crossmember? Thanks >> Hi listers, I called Vans and got my answer. I didn't pay close enough attention and didn't notice that the bulkhead sides sit on top of the upright edge of the longeron. I had mine slid down inside the longeron. Like Tom at Van's said "that would leave a 1/8" gap for you skin to go across". Anyway, once I set the bulkhead on top of the longerons and set the correct incidence, it measured just right. Thanks for the responses off list and on. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2000
From: Danny Holder <holder(at)multipro.com>
Subject: Re: private airstrips
Thanks for the information... Danny C J Heitman wrote: > > < without first satisfying the local government at all levels.>> > > Bill: > I found that it is not necessary to get local approval prior to getting FAA > approval. You only need to submit FAA Form 7480-1, "Notice of Landing Area > Proposal", to the Airports District Office that handles your area. The > purpose of the FAA review is to conduct an airspace study to determine if > your proposal will pose a hazard to existing airspace use. I submitted my > form to the Minneapolis ADO on 4/11/99 and on 5/24/99 the ADO sent me a > letter stating that there were no objections to my proposal. Those that > grumble about government interference in their lives should realize that by > following this procedure, you are protecting your airstrip from a neighbor > who may want to build an airstrip that interferes with yours. There is > another private airstrip several miles from mine and the FAA sent the owner > a letter asking if he had any objections to my airstrip (he didn't). The > state Bureau of Aeronautics (Wisconsin) was very helpful in getting the > forms filled out properly and actually forwarded the FAA form to Minneapolis > after checking it for errors. I received permission from the state during > this same time frame. There were no fees charged by either the state or the > feds. All of this was done before ever contacting the local government > officials. I think that having the state and federal approvals in hand prior > to talking to the local officials helped indicate to them that I was being > responsible and made it easier to clear their hurdles. (The local township > and county approvals were more of a hassle and did involve some fees but all > was accomplished by 9/13/00.) > > Bill, I also agree that private airstrips are a wonderful thing and I can't > hardly wait for my RV to be completed so that I can fully utilize my > airstrip. > > Chris Heitman > Heitman Field > Dousman WI > RV-9A N94ME (reserved) > installing wingtip lights, waiting for fuselage > http://www.execpc.com/~cjh/rv9a.html > -- name="holder.vcf" filename="holder.vcf" begin:vcard n:Holder;Danny url:www.homestead.com/wittlewattles/index.html adr:;;;;;; version:2.1 email;internet:www.homestead.com/wittlewattles/index.html note:Check this site out for hand-crafted baby rattles fn:Danny Holder end:vcard ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2000
From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls(at)aeroelectric.com>
Subject: Re: voltage reg/protector
"Robert L. Nuckolls, III" > >I used an external regulated 50 amp alternator from a ford van. P/N >14118. It is large but everyithing else I hunted was also. I will likey >build a hump on the cowling. I went from $200.00 to $35.00 with the core >charge at Auto Zone. > >The voltage regulator was a 80 ford Van. P/N was VR749 & cost $10.00. >If you use an internal voltage regulator, Bob has diagrams to use relays >for the OV protection. > >Your bring 12 volts from a 15 amp fuse to a 5 amp breaker to the master >switch. Why, I have no idea. Looks like one fuse would do it. bob wants >the alt circiut to come on & off with the master so I used his 701-2-5. I >use a fuse that is not "get to ably" so the breaker can be used in flight >to turn off the alternator. Now if something goes wrong, that is post to >take the alternator control voltage off lline. The idea was that the line between the bus (remote mounted fuse block) and the panel mounted c/b was protected. Turns out there are some pretty whimpy breakers out there that took so long to open with an OV fault that the 15A fuse would go first . . . hence the fusible link shown on the latest drawings. Bob . . . -------------------------------------------- ( Knowing about a thing is different than ) ( understanding it. One can know a lot ) ( and still understand nothing. ) ( C.F. Kettering ) -------------------------------------------- http://www.aeroelectric.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Weight and Balance-JACKING AIRCRAFT
From: pcondon(at)csc.com
Date: Sep 25, 2000
09/25/2000 02:17:48 PM How about two of Vans axil jack adaptors and two cheap hydrolic 4-wheeled creeper jacks ( Wal-Mart @ 19.99). Thats how we did the 3 RV's here in south NJ.... be sure to pile on the wheel and wheel pant onto the jack. The 4 wheeled jack is positioned onto a scale. Subtract the weight of the jack and axil-jack adaptor..... When yourall done you now have 2 jacks that making rotating your tires a snap (both on the aircraft and your car(s)) fasching(at)amigo.net@matronics.com on 09/21/2000 07:08:44 PM Please respond to rv-list(at)matronics.com; Please respond to fasching(at)amigo.net Sent by: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com cc: Subject: RV-List: Weight and Balance I have done two W&B's on my RV6A....once upon completion, again after painting it. It scares the begeebers out of me to jack up high enough to get it into a flight level attitude. I plan to add some stuff to the plane soon and would again need to do a W&B....what clever methods have you used to avoid getting the mains so high that a slip off the pile of timbers (or whatever) would cause damage? I thought of putting the mains on scales on the edge of the taxiway, and digging a trench into the dirt just off the blacktop to run the nose wheel into and up on another scale so that nothing is high enough to endanger me or the plane. Ideas? RV6A Flying Salida, CO ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2000
From: Finn Lassen <finnlassen(at)netzero.net>
Subject: Re: RV3-List: RV-3 Wheel shimmey update
No wheel pants nor leg fairings yet. It's very possible that the added weight of the pants would further dampen the shimmy. Finn LessDragProd(at)aol.com wrote: > --> RV3-List message posted by: LessDragProd(at)aol.com > > In a message dated 09/25/2000 12:19:54 PM Pacific Daylight Time, > finnlassen(at)netzero.net writes: > > > As those of you who followed the wheel shimmy thread about a year ago > > know, I had bad fore-aft shimmy of my wheels at about 20 mph. Tried > > everything: low tire pressure, balancing wheels, tightening the axle > > nut. I finally gave in and put on the wood strips as per the manual. As > > I used too small strips I still had shimmy at 20 mph but acceptable in > > that I could accelerate and brake through it before it built up. > (Snip) > > > > Finn > > > Hi Finn, > > Did you try balancing the wheel pants? > > Jim Ayers > RV-3 N47RV > Why pay for something you could get for free? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2000
From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls(at)aeroelectric.com>
Subject: Re: voltage reg/protector
"Robert L. Nuckolls, III" > >I need a part # for an auto voltage regulator and I understand Bob N. sells a >circuit protector. Not sure on all of this ele stuff and the names, so you >have to bare with me. >Carey Mills What kind of alternator do you have? Do you have our book or have you downloaded articles and/or wiring diagrams from our website? Bob . . . -------------------------------------------- ( Knowing about a thing is different than ) ( understanding it. One can know a lot ) ( and still understand nothing. ) ( C.F. Kettering ) -------------------------------------------- http://www.aeroelectric.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2000
From: Mike Thompson <grobdriver(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: F687/F606 Attachment
Hi folks, I have to admit to being a little unhappy this evening - I am a bit flummoxed over how to attach the 687 rib to the 606 bulkhead. There are some hits in the archives, but they do not address my problem, Frank J. is vague (unbelievable!), Frank V. doesn't mention it, and, well, here's the problem: When I line up the 687 on the centerline the front flange sits right where I placed that nice line of flush (forward) rivets which hold the 606 bulkhead together. I've re-read the manual and notes on the bulkhead assembly and there is no mention of allowing for this development. I can only surmise that I am to drill out the rivets and back-drill through the 606 into the 687 flange, then rivet the whole thing together. Am I missing something? This had to happen - progress was going so well! Mike Thompson Austin, TX -6 N140RV (Reserved) Fuselage Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steven DiNieri" <capsteve(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: control stick mounting
Date: Sep 25, 2000
I hastily reamed mine out with a drill bit and have a bit of slop on one side. So while we're on the subject just what is the specific part number for the bushing itself...I've stuck away those plans and have been too lazy to look it up ... Steven DiNieri Grasp the bushing with a v-block, squashed in a vise. Reaming took 5 seconds. Besure not to squeez the bushing to tight or otherwise distort it while clamping it. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2000
From: Thomas McIntyre <bogeybrother(at)earthlink.net>
Linzel Gray Civ 43CES/CECP
Subject: Re: RE: RV3-List: re:trim control
Linzel What size engine and what was your empty weight? Tom RV3 Linzel Gray Civ 43CES/CECP wrote: > > I built my bare bones rv3 in 18 months. I averaged about 3 hours a day 7 > days a week of construction time. I built mine from a complete kit from > vans that I recieved in 1994. Maybe one of the last ones shipped before the > production hold. My kit cost $6,500. Mine has no paint and a partial > electrical system, starter, batery, selonoid switch, push button starter. I > have a gravity feed fuselage tank with no fuel pumps. No lights and no > radios. It has a Sterba 68X72 prop that yields very low RPMs on takeoff but > tops out at 2750 RPM and about 215 top speed at almost any altitude. > > Gray Linzel > 300+ hours RV3 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Stewart [mailto:bruces(at)shoalhaven.net.au] > Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 11:21 PM > To: Rob Reece; rv3-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV3-List: re:trim control > > --> RV3-List message posted by: Bruce Stewart > > OK got it thanks to all. > > Whats next? do I get divorsed now > or do I add ammenities to the shed > for the day I chucked out =:o) !!!! > > It seems that the average build time here > in OZ is any thing between 1 year and 10+! > how much time did you guys take to build? > > Bruce > > >Bruce- > > > >On the newer plans (1984+) the placement of the elevator trim lever is > >difficult to see (going by the preview plans). It is on drawing 25 left > >side view, section D-D. Drawing 27 gives the attachment details. > > > >On the older plans (pre-1984) the elevator trim lever placement is easier > to > >see (full size plans anyway?) on drawing 16 left side view and the section > >J-J detail shows the actual lever and not just the cutout per the newer > >plans. Drawing 20 gives the attachment details (differ from the newer > >plans). > > > >Hope that helps? > > > >RV-3's forever! > > > >Rob Reece > >RV-3 SN45 "total rebuild" project > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Bruce Stewart" <bruces(at)shoalhaven.net.au> > >To: > >Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 5:19 PM > >Subject: RV3-List: re:trim control > > > > > >> --> RV3-List message posted by: Bruce Stewart > >> > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I've been pouring over the pre view set and I can't see where exactly > >> the trim control (lever) is installed? (not on the drawings I got > anyway). > >> > >> ??? > >> > >> Thanks > >> Bruce > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 25, 2000
Subject: Re: Tire Special
In a message dated 9/25/00 3:45:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time, akroguy(at)hotmail.com writes: << I just ordered a set of Condors including tubes for $132 including shipping. Pretty good deal from what I can determine. The kit tires (Air Trainers) won't last very long for getting used to a first RV. So, I figure a set of higher grade tires, and better landings (hoping) will yield longer tire life. We'll see! >> My original Aero Trainers lasted 150 hrs TT on my 6A. I then put the Condors on and they are a little less than halfway thru their tread at 350 hrs TT. They are a good value, run smooth and have a lot harder compound. -GV (RV-6A N1GV) vanremog(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HCRV6(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 26, 2000
Subject: Re: F687/F606 Attachment
In a message dated 9/25/00 7:54:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time, grobdriver(at)yahoo.com writes: << I can only surmise that I am to drill out the rivets and back-drill through the 606 into the 687 flange, then rivet the whole thing together. >> That's exactly what I had to do, so for whatever small comfort it is you won't be the first. Harry Crosby Pleasanton, California RV-6, working on elevator push/pull tubes ( taking a break from the canopy) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2000
From: Dave Bristol <bj034(at)lafn.org>
Subject: Re: control stick mounting
I stand corrected folks, I re-read the plans and they say to ream the ID on the stick assembly for .005 clearance, not the ID of the bushing. Actually this makes more sense and if I remember correctly I think that's the way I did it. Dave N87DL Dave Bristol wrote: > > > Brian, > > > If the bushing does not rotate about the bolt, then there is no reason to ream > > the bushing to .0005 tollerance as called for in the plans (RV6). I think that > > you'll find that the bushing should be tight in the stick assembly and rotate > > around the bolt. Also if the bushing were supposed to rotate in the stick, > > then the stick assembly would have to be reamed to fit the bushing. > > Dave > > Brian Denk wrote: > > > > > I had to ream out the bushings with a 1/4" drill bit. I used cutting oil, > > and clamped the rag protected bushings in a vice. Once the AN4 bolt will > > slip through without force, the next task is to trim the bushings to length > > so they are just slightly longer than the stick. The bushing is fixed in > > place when the nut is tightened down in the final assembly. So, the stick > > rotates about the bushing/bolt assembly which does not rotate. Polish the > > outer surface of the bushing to get a nice, smooth, non-binding fit in the > > stick weldment. You want free motion here, but no excess slop either. > > > > This is how it's done in my RV8, but I reckon the -6 follows the same > > concept. > > > > Brian Denk > > RV8 N94BD > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2000
From: Kevin Horton <khorton(at)cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: Throttle quadrant curved cover
> >Someone made a curved cover for their throttle quadrant that looked a lot >better than leaving it 'uncovered'. Anyone know who did that? I'm >searching for the pic. > >Thanks, > >Bill in Tucson Do you mean Lyle Hefel's RV-8? Pictures at: http://www.egroups.com/files/rv8list/ -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (misc fuselage stuff) Ottawa, Canada http://members.nbci.com/kevinhorton/rv8.html ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 26, 2000
From: Mike Thompson <grobdriver(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Weight and Balance-JACKING AIRCRAFT
--- pcondon(at)csc.com wrote: > > > How about two of Vans axil jack adaptors and two cheap hydrolic > 4-wheeled > creeper jacks ( Wal-Mart @ 19.99). Thats how we did the 3 RV's here > in south NJ.... Or you could not _jack_ it up - and lift it instead. We had great luck lifting a -6A to slide the scales underneath. Hooked an engine hoist to the engine lift point, put a padded saw horse under the tail and used the saw horse to lever the aircraft into the air with the hoist. Worked great, and nothing blocked our positioning the scales. Mike Thompson Austin, TX -6 N140RV (Reserved) Fuselage Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6bldr(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: F687/F606 Attachment
Date: Sep 26, 2000
Mike, You are correct, but you are in luck....the 687 only catches 3 of the 4 rivets! Jerry Calvert Edmond Ok -6 fuselage ----- Original Message ----- From: Mike Thompson <grobdriver(at)yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 9:52 PM Subject: RV-List: F687/F606 Attachment > > Hi folks, > > I have to admit to being a little unhappy this evening - I am a bit > flummoxed over how to attach the 687 rib to the 606 bulkhead. > There are some hits in the archives, but they do not address my > problem, Frank J. is vague (unbelievable!), Frank V. doesn't mention > it, and, well, here's the problem: > > When I line up the 687 on the centerline the front flange sits right > where I placed that nice line of flush (forward) rivets which hold the > 606 bulkhead together. > > I've re-read the manual and notes on the bulkhead assembly and there is > no mention of allowing for this development. I can only surmise that I > am to drill out the rivets and back-drill through the 606 into the 687 > flange, then rivet the whole thing together. > > Am I missing something? This had to happen - progress was going so > well! > > Mike Thompson > Austin, TX > -6 N140RV (Reserved) > Fuselage > > > Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 26, 2000
From: Mike Thompson <grobdriver(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: F687/F606 Attachment
> I don't recall what I did there... fuselage construction is already > ancient history! Hell, I can't even remember what the F687 rib is! > > Perhaps you could email me something to put into the Guide describing > how you solved the problem? > > Frank van der Hulst. > Keeper of the Bunnys Guide to RV Building Hi Frank, Everyone's pretty much said the same thing - drill out the 606 rivets and back-drill through the 687 (that is the rib along the top of the fuselage upon which the slider's slide rail sits, and runs from the 606 to the 607 bulkheads - attaches to the 607 via small angle). I can't imagine another way around it - which is why I figured I _had_ to be doing something stupid. Guess not. (I once thought I was wrong, but later learned that I was mistaken about that) :) Thanks to all - will head out to do some drilling before work. Mike Thompson Austin, TX -6 N140RV (Reserved) Fuselage Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ray sheffield" <1052a(at)prodigy.net>
Subject: Re: Middlesboro fly-in
Date: Sep 26, 2000
Hi Jim, I may fly my rv-6a to Middlesboro, Sun, is there breakfast or anything going on? ray sheffield 112rs 1052a(at)prodigy.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Sears" <sears(at)searnet.com> Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2000 6:37 AM Subject: RV-List: Middlesboro fly-in > > Gangsters and RV-listers > > There is to be a EAA fly-in at Middlesboro,KY (1A6) on Sept. 30 - > October 1. Rob Herklotz, our AYA Southern Region coordinator, has > confirmed these dates for us. I understand it's usually a pretty good > event and centers around the P-38 restoration project that came from > the Greenland ice cap. I've heard they've had some pretty nice > warbirds at the event, in the past. I've never been to the event due > to conflicts or weather; but, I'm planning on being there this time. > > Gangsters, I know this is the "New Orleans" weekend for you > southern region AYA members; but, perhaps some the our more local > Grumman drivers will find this event easier to get to. I think Rob is > going to be there because he doesn't live far from Middlesboro and > couldn't make it to New Orleans. > > BTW, the nice thing about the P-38 project is that you can get close > and personal with it. The restorers encougage people like us to > enjoy our visits to the project and do allow some touchy-feely of the > aircraft. That's a bit unusual, to me. What's even more unusual is > the fact that the restorers stop their work to talk with us. They want > us to know all about the project and are very proud of what they're > doing. I must admit it's quite a project and was an inspiration to me > as I was building my RV-6A. Oh, yeah. One of the guys is a RV nut, > too. > > I hope you guys show up in your Grummans, Yankees, and RV's. I'm > sure planning to be there on Saturday, weather permitting. > > Jim Sears in KY > RV-6A N198JS > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Bower" <rvbuilder(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Back Riveting
Date: Sep 26, 2000
Greg, A friend of mine back riveted his wings and fuselage wherever possible, and they look great! I plan to do the same. Avery (and probably others) sells a back-riveting set that is offset so ribs don't get in the way. Jim Bower >From: "Greg Tanner" <gtanner(at)bendcable.com> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com, "Greg Tanner" >To: >Subject: RV-List: Back Riveting >Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:29:40 -0700 > > >Is there a quality problem with back riveting as many rivets as are >accessible? Does back riveting provide an equal (or better)amount of >clamping force as face riveting? > >Greg Tanner >RV-9A Empennage >SER #90186 N80BR (APPLIED FOR) > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 26, 2000
From: "Thomas Nguyen" <TNGUYEN(at)oss.oceaneering.com>
Subject: Re: Weight and Balance-JACKING AIRCRAFT
>>>>>> Or you could not _jack_ it up - and lift it instead. We had great luck lifting a -6A to slide the scales underneath. Hooked an engine hoist to the engine lift point, put a padded saw horse under the tail and used the saw horse to lever the aircraft into the air with the hoist. Worked great, and nothing blocked our positioning the scales. <<<<<<<<<< I would not recommend to use the engine lift point to lift up the aircraft. This engine lift point is for lifting the engine only. T.Nguyen RV-6A N747TN ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 26, 2000
From: Gary Zilik <zilik(at)bewellnet.com>
Subject: Re: Weight and Balance-JACKING AIRCRAFT
> > Or you could not _jack_ it up - and lift it instead. > We had great luck lifting a -6A to slide the scales underneath. > Hooked an engine hoist to the engine lift point, put a padded saw horse > under the tail and used the saw horse to lever the aircraft into the > air with the hoist. > Worked great, and nothing blocked our positioning the scales. > food for thought. The engine lift point is for the engine alone. I have heard horror stories (none confermed) about the hook ripping out from the engine case when lifting plane in this manner. -- Gary Zilik - Pine Junction, Colorado RV-6A N99PZ Flying Engine: Aerosport Power O-360-A1A Prop: Sensenich 72FM8S9-1-83 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 26, 2000
From: Mike Thompson <grobdriver(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Back Riveting
> > Greg, > > A friend of mine back riveted his wings and fuselage wherever > possible, and > they look great! I plan to do the same. Avery (and probably others) > sells > a back-riveting set that is offset so ribs don't get in the way. > > Jim Bower > > > >Is there a quality problem with back riveting as many rivets as are > >accessible? Does back riveting provide an equal (or better)amount of > >clamping force as face riveting? > > > >Greg Tanner A caution I learned from back riveting my fuselage with my wife. Make sure the "bucker" with the back rivet set (Avery's mushroom-with-a-handle in our case) is pretty strong. As she got tired she reduced her pressure on the set, and the gun caused the skins to separate as it set the rivet. The rivets would look great when we started out - 30 minutes later they were pooching and looked like hell. Couldn't figure it out at first but then tumbled to the cause. We finished it up using standard gun and bucking bar. Mike Thompson Austin, TX -6 N140RV (Reserved) Fuselage Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 26, 2000
From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: F687/F606 Attachment
Mike Thompson wrote: > > > > I don't recall what I did there... fuselage construction is already > > ancient history! Hell, I can't even remember what the F687 rib is! > > > > Perhaps you could email me something to put into the Guide describing > > how you solved the problem? > > > > Frank van der Hulst. > > Keeper of the Bunnys Guide to RV Building > > Hi Frank, > > Everyone's pretty much said the same thing - drill out the 606 rivets > and back-drill through the 687 (that is the rib along the top of the > fuselage upon which the slider's slide rail sits, and runs from the 606 > to the 607 bulkheads - attaches to the 607 via small angle). > I can't imagine another way around it - which is why I figured I _had_ > to be doing something stupid. Guess not. (I once thought I was wrong, > but later learned that I was mistaken about that) > :) > > Thanks to all - will head out to do some drilling before work. > > Mike Thompson > Austin, TX > -6 N140RV (Reserved) > Fuselage I took a different approach to the initial fuse assembly which inadvertently avoided the issue of having to drill out the rivets. It seemed to me that it would be easier to fabricate as much of the cabin bulkhead assembly on the bench as possible before setting everything into the jig. Turns out most of the structure around the cabin can be "pre-assembled" on the workbench, then transferred to the jig for final assembly. You can see what I am talking about here: http://home.HiWAAY.net/~sbuc/journal/fuse2.html It was during this phase that it was apparent the 687 rib would share some rivets and having to drill out rivets later was unnecessary. I found the assembly of this section on the bench to be easier than working around the jig and encourage builders who are approaching this phase of construction to consider this option. Sam Buchanan (RV-6) http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 26, 2000
From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls(at)aeroelectric.com>
Subject: Re: Dual batteries
"Robert L. Nuckolls, III" > I have experiance with marine electrical systems. Their are some very >light, vapor sealed rotary battery switches. They would need to be modified >for aviation use. But they are very reliable and are capable of high current >loads. For two battery systems, the rotary switch is labeled left, right, >both. It's very easy and in fact recommended that multiple batteries each have their own contactor for connection to the system. Furhter, there are connections to each battery that do not go through the contactor for running components of an electrically dependent engine. I.e., your electrically dependent engine should operate whether or not the DC master switch(es) are ON or OFF . . . >> It's not an issue of electrical demand its the reliability and redundancy >> that concerns me. I have the Stratus Subaru engine and I'm getting the >> dual ignition but obviously don't have mags. So the second battery would be >> primarily backup power for the ignition, but potentially you could use two >> batteries of the same size and provide complete redundancy. Of course on >> the other hand adding that reduncy could also increase the complexity and >> reduce the reliability of the system. I'm just interested if there is some >> experience out there with some real simple redundant electrical systems. This topic has been discussed at length on the lists, in our book, in articles downloadable from our website and illustrated in numerous wiring diagrams downloadable from the website. Two-battery installations are no big deal . . . >The concern you have for flying with your soob electrical system is >legitimate. If auto systems are going to be used in aircraft, then you must >build in redundant systems to match typical aircraft systems. I'll suggest the LAST thing we want to do is match "typical" aircraft systems . . . the architecture, components and pilot's understanding of those systems have not changed in 50 years. >If a battery fails in most aircraft, the engine will continue to run, >In your auto set up if the battery fails so does your engine. A >two battery system duplicates the two magneto system pretty close >as far as redundantcy is concerned. Batteries can and do fail with >out warning. Batteries do NOT fail without warning. It's just that most of us don't pay any attention to what the battery is trying to tell us. We replace tires when the tread is gone, overhaul cylinders when the compression gets low, file nicks out of propellers when noticed, etc . . . . but we beat a battery until it fails to crank the engine . . . and replace it after we've propped the airplane for the third time. Very rudimentary preventative maintenance techiques will insure that nobody reading these words will EVER experience battery failure. >To reduce the weight penalty two smaller bateries can be used, >but they must be sized with absolute precision. Don't know about "precision" but some consideration must be given to what a battery's task is. Batteries have three duties: (1) crank the engine, (2) stabilize alternator(s) and (3) provide power for essential goodies should alternator output be lost. The BEST hedge against alternator failure is two alternators . . . dump the sucky vacuum pump and install a second alternator. THEN the batteries on board no longer have to be sized for standby power. Total system weight can be much reduced. >This topic is outside my area of knowledge, so educate me. I have an HDS >with Stratus Soob. I have a small motorcycle battery (14AH) which has >cranked me up without hesitation for 18 months and 98 hours of flight >time. If my alternator light comes on and my instruments haven't indicated a >problem, I think I can turn off my master and fly a long time on battery. I'd encourage this builder to replace THINKING with KNOWING how long his airplane will stay aloft battery only. Your battery should be no smaller than your fuel tank. If you do not KNOW that the battery capacity on board will allow you to use up fuel on board, then I'll suggest further investigation, personal education and perhaps some changes to your system are indicated . . > something is wrong with the battery, shouldn't there be early indications. > For thirty-one bucks I can get a new one. I have dual ignition but never > thought I needed dual batteries. What are the odds of loosing all > electrical if you are maintaining your airplane and monitoring your > instruments? My empty weight is 602 and I like that. There's no pat answer to this . . . a number of options exist for insuring your flight system reliability. My personal goal for system reliability is, "From the time I break ground to the time I land, I don't want to break a sweat." This doesn't have to mean nothing ever fails. It means that I have to architecture a system for failure tolerance and educate myself in its operation and maintenance to sustain that level of reliability. Dual batteries and indeed dual alternators can often make for a LIGHTER airplane. >1. Flight over hostile territory (I fly in the Pacific Northwest w/o a lot >of "emergency landing fields"). >2. Alternator craps out. This happens a LOT on certified aircraft . . . just check the service difficulty reports at faa.gov . . . the REASON alternators crap a lot is because the overwhelming majority of the TC fleet are fitted with crappy alternators . . . holy-watered and configuration managed right into antiquity. TC alternators fail routinely in obscene ways every month . . . through bolts broke, cases cracked, bearings seized, windings burned . . . you name it . . . it happens. By LAW, that alternator will be returned to ORIGINAL configuration and bolted back on some poor pilot's airplane. B&C and similar alternators (Nipon-Dienso) have DEMONSTRATED operational reliability suggesting that most will run the lifetime of engine with nothing more than a belt change. B&C's return rate in thousands of sales over the past 10 years has been under 1% for the total fleet! >3. The above fact is discovered by the voltage dropping alarmingly low on >the voltmeter. Why not some form of ACTIVE notification of alternator failure? Most pilots don't look at the voltmeter until the panel starts to go black or the radios begin to mis-behave . . . with no ACTIVE notification, one tootles along with everything operating and lights blazing thus squandering a limited energy resource. By the time you know anything is wrong, your options are all gone. >4. Shedding the electrical load still leaves too little juice to power >things like radio, fuel pump, and CD player. See articles on website and chapter in book on system reliability. >Hence, I installed a second 17 ah battery with a switch on the panel that >kicks in the second battery and provides extra time to make a safe landing >with needed equipment. Dual 17 a.h. batteries is 34 pounds total. Add to this about 8-10 pounds of vacuum system for 44 pounds. Now consider taking out two batteries, one vacuum system and putting one 4 to 7 pound alternator and one 10 pound battery for a weight REDUCTION of 27 pounds and a net increase in flight system reliability unequaled in ANY certified aircraft. >5 years ago I was on a 300 mile cross country in a Cessna 150. 30 miles from >my destination the voltage regulator apparently failed wide open. Sparks and >smoke started spewing our of the instrument panel as my first indication. In >the short time I took to turn everything off, it was too late, basically >everthing that was "on" failed including the electric clock. I was also >amazed that in that short time, the battery was completely discharged. Once >the smoke cleared and I calmed down. I continued to my destination with a >completely inoperative electrical system and made a normal no flap landing. >With one battery and an electronic ignition system, I would have had a dead >engine as well. Forgive me, I am in no way trying to demean this writer's experience but this is typical of the "dark and stormy night" stories that drive our design, maintenance and operating decisions on homebuilts. I'll suggest that TC aircraft can be used only as examples of how NOT to architecture, maintain and operate an electrical system. I've often written that my personal mind-set climbing into a rental TC ship is that I don't care if ANY of that stuff is working 5 minutes after take-off. I intend to get where I need to go without breaking a sweat. That means UNDERSTANDING the limitations of a machine designed mechanics and procedures . . . and outfitting myself to deal with the worst. $30 worth of parts and a weekend's effort could elevate the average TC aircraft into 21st century . . . but it ain't gonna happen. This is why we need to look past our experience with TC ships to design and operate our airplanes. Virtually EVERY concern voiced above can be addressed with simple choices in architecture and knowledge of how the system and its components operate. Education and decisions based on understanding will make it so . . . Bob . . . -------------------------------------------- ( Knowing about a thing is different than ) ( understanding it. One can know a lot ) ( and still understand nothing. ) ( C.F. Kettering ) -------------------------------------------- http://www.aeroelectric.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 26, 2000
Subject: F687/F606 Attachment
From: Don Jordan <dons6a(at)juno.com>
Mike: I am doing a tip-up, but I fitted the 687, 688, & the 606 together with clecos & later when the top skin came along I backdrilled the pattern to the skin. Don Jordan -- 6A finish -- Arlington, Tx -- dons6a(at)juno.com ********************************************** writes: > > Hi folks, > > I have to admit to being a little unhappy this evening - I am a bit > flummoxed over how to attach the 687 rib to the 606 bulkhead. > There are some hits in the archives, but they do not address my > problem, Frank J. is vague (unbelievable!), Frank V. doesn't mention > it, and, well, here's the problem: > > When I line up the 687 on the centerline the front flange sits right > where I placed that nice line of flush (forward) rivets which hold > the > 606 bulkhead together. > > I've re-read the manual and notes on the bulkhead assembly and there > is > no mention of allowing for this development. I can only surmise > that I > am to drill out the rivets and back-drill through the 606 into the > 687 > flange, then rivet the whole thing together. > > Am I missing something? This had to happen - progress was going so > well! > > Mike Thompson > Austin, TX > -6 N140RV (Reserved) > Fuselage > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 26, 2000
From: Mike Thompson <grobdriver(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Weight and Balance-JACKING AIRCRAFT
> > Or you could not _jack_ it up - and lift it instead. > > We had great luck lifting a -6A to slide the scales underneath. > > Hooked an engine hoist to the engine lift point, put a padded saw > horse > > under the tail and used the saw horse to lever the aircraft into > the > > air with the hoist. > > Worked great, and nothing blocked our positioning the scales. > > > > food for thought. The engine lift point is for the engine alone. I > have > heard horror stories (none confermed) about the hook ripping out from > the engine case when lifting plane in this manner. > > -- > Gary Zilik - Pine Junction, Colorado I am reminded by a local RVer who also helped that we used the engine mount rather than the engine case to lift the aircraft. Sorry for the mis-information. Memory - the second thing to go... - Mike ==== Michael E. Thompson (Grobdriver(at)yahoo.com) Austin, TX, USA RV-6 in progress, N140RV (Reserved) EX-AX1 Sub Hunter, P-3 (B/B-TACMOD/C) Orion Aircrew, PP-G,ASEL, Motorglider Driver and Unlimited Air Race Nut! Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "les williams" <rv6aflyr(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: RV-6A Cowling Hinges
Date: Sep 26, 2000
Mike, et. al., I used 9 each of the large 4000 series camlocks spaced about 5" apart across the rear of the top type S cowling. Because of the edge distance requiements for these, I had to cut into the foam core and re-glas the area for the camloc receptacle tabs to nest. This has weakened that area and now I see some distortion taking place around the center camlocs from the pressure of the cooling plenum pushing up on the cowl. There is also a little puckering of the cowl between the camlocs. The use of a closed cooling plenum system would probably alleviate this, but I would still not use the large camlocs again and cut into the cowl foam core. If you don't want to use the hinge method in this area, I would suggest using more of the 2700 series camlocs, or screws, spaced closer together. I wanted to keep the molded in overlap on the horizontal sides, so I am using #8 trusshead screws there right now, spaced about 4" apart, and that has worked out fine. I do plan to change those to countersunk type screws, or 2700 series camlocs, before I get the plane painted. The use of comlocs in this area would require that most of them be completely removed to facilitate the installation and removal of the top cowl due to it's rigidity and close fit, so I probably will not use these here. On the vertical sides and across the bottom of the lower cowl, I'm using the kit supplied 1/8" aluminum hinge, per plans. This works well except for the two innermost eyes on each side near the scoop, which have broken three times in 30 hrs. I just recently installed stainless steel hinge segments on the cowl portion in that area and will see how they hold up. The ones on the firewall side may now break, so I may have to install plates and screws there, which is a common thing to do on the -6 and -6A. Les/RV-6A N24LW/Tacoma WA >Anyone have any experience using camlocks with the S-Cowl for RV6A instead of >hinges? If so please let me know how many were used, where used and whether >it worked out as alternative. >Thanks for the help. >Mike ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: Go-Ped wheel as tailwheel
Date: Sep 26, 2000
Listers, A while back I raised the idea that a Go-Ped wheel might be used as a tailwheel since it looked approximately the right size, and since there is a plethora of really nice light billet versions available. Well, I took the wheel off my Go-Ped recently and here is the result... the axle is exactly the same diameter as the Van's unit, and the width is exactly the same. The only problem is that the diameter of the wheel/tire is larger and it won't fit due to interference with the tailwheel bracket. Now it *would* be possible to reduce the size of the solid rubber tire to fit nicely. You'd then have a light, strong, really trick looking tailwheel with a solid rubber tire than cannot blow-out like the Andair has been known to do. Again, aftermarket Go-Ped wheels can be found at www.enginetrix.com/goped-customparts.htm. If someone can figure out how to get one of these into a lathe or something, or maybe chuck it up in a drill press, then shave the tire leaving a nice finish we'd be off and running. Anyone had any experience shaving/finishing hard rubber tires? I have a pic of the standard tailwheel next to the Go-Ped unit that I will post to my web site in a few days when i get back in town if you're curious what these things look like. Randy Lervold RV-8, #80500, sanding, filling, sanding, priming, sanding, filling, sanding, sanding, sanding... www.rv-8.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 26, 2000
From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls(at)aeroelectric.com>
Subject: Re: GPS
"Robert L. Nuckolls, III" >I use the Garmin GPS III pilot on the dash of a Kitfox lite and it works >great. My antenna is left on the GPS. The altitude feature is very helpful >as I can watch rate of climb/decent. Do the cheap GPS's have altitude? I >think this is a feature of the number of satellites they pick up. I wrote an article for Sport Aviation about three years ago that you can download at http://www.aeroelectric.com/articles/nailgun.pdf The radios have changed but the basic facts have not. I've not turned on a VOR receiver in 3 years. I fly dual GPS with a total investment of about $200. I give these things away at my weekend seminars. Given the signup rate for the Santa Rosa program next weekend, I'll probably give away two of them. There's no better return on investment than a low-end Magellan hand held GPS receiver. The AOPA airport directly makes entry of a new airport location about a 2 minute trivial task. Since selective access was turned off, my GPS300 gives altitude in 1 foot increments. WARNING! Altitud displays can lag considerably behind true altitude . . . it's harder to calculate and can be off by several hundred feed after a rapid/large change. Give it a few minutes to settle down and/or make altitude changes more sedately and you'll find the readings track your altimeter very closely. Bob . . . -------------------------------------------- ( Knowing about a thing is different than ) ( understanding it. One can know a lot ) ( and still understand nothing. ) ( C.F. Kettering ) -------------------------------------------- http://www.aeroelectric.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ross Mickey" <rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: All Electric : Battery size/Duel alternators
Date: Sep 26, 2000
I am building an all electric panel using a B&C 40 amp alternator with the 8 amp PM alternator as a backup. Since I have two sources of electrical energy, I am considering downsizing the battery to meet one purpose....start the engine...an O-360 with constant speed prop. I know most folks are going with 17ah batteries. Will a smaller one give me adequate cranking capacity? Assume pre-heat in winter and normal starting temps above 40 degrees. Weight differences: 5 amp 4.25 lb 1.17 amps/lb 7.2 amp 5.45 lbs 1.32 amps/lb 10 amp 7.85 lbs 1.27 amps/lb 12 amp 8.41 lbs 1.42 amps/lb 17 amp 14.3 lbs 1.18 amps/lb Looking at the technical specs from Hawker http://www.hepi.com/products/genesis/genprod.htm and Panasonic http://www.panasonic.com/industrial_oem/battery/battery_oem/chem/seal/seal.h tm I see things like "Nominal short circuit current" and discharge characteristic curves but nothing to give me "cranking amps" or whatever term the advertisements use. Ross Mickey 6-A Eugene, Oregon ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Persyk" <dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Vinyl in QB Gas Tank
Date: Sep 26, 2000
A local builder reported that he discovered vinyl covering still adhered to the inside of his 6A QB wing tank (one of two). He sent it back to Van's for repair. I offer this as a head's up to other QB builders as this is potentially dangerous. As always, I suggest you contact Van's for details if you have concerns. Dennis Persyk 6A N600DP O360A1A/Hartzell 0.0 hours Hampshire, IL C38 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 26, 2000
From: "Builder's Bookstore" <winterland(at)rkymtnhi.com>
Subject: vortex generators
"Builder's Bookstore" I just ordered a set of vortex generators for my 6A from Micro Aerodynamics. I did this based on an RV-4 pilots recent flight report of a 10 mph reduction in stall speed, a nice stall buffet warning about 3 mph before stall, and a noticeable decrease in takeoff roll. And another great benefit; ...it may keep the lookie-loos from sitting on my wings at fly-ins. (or at least they will only sit on them once) I'm looking forward to trying these things. Anything I can do to make lift at our high altitudes has got to be worthy. I'll keep you posted Andy Builder's Bookstore http://buildersbooks.com eCharts http://eCharts.cc ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Back Riveting
From: pcondon(at)csc.com
Date: Sep 26, 2000
09/26/2000 03:52:22 PM I used a piece of stainless about the size of a pack of cigarettes, a little thicker........anyway, this hand-held piece of metal was used by my wife and myself to back rivet just about every rivet we could. Very professional finish and less chance of hurting the metal with a lazy or mis-directed rivet gun blow. If & when I did mess up the "ouch" was on the inside or tail part of the rivet....another reason I like back riveting. I sanded the metal round on the edges to fit the hand better.....basically just dressed the block of steel on my sanding belt. rvbuilder(at)hotmail.com@matronics.com on 09/26/2000 08:41:55 AM Please respond to rv-list(at)matronics.com; Please respond to rvbuilder(at)hotmail.com Sent by: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com cc: Subject: Re: RV-List: Back Riveting Greg, A friend of mine back riveted his wings and fuselage wherever possible, and they look great! I plan to do the same. Avery (and probably others) sells a back-riveting set that is offset so ribs don't get in the way. Jim Bower >From: "Greg Tanner" <gtanner(at)bendcable.com> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com, "Greg Tanner" >To: >Subject: RV-List: Back Riveting >Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:29:40 -0700 > > >Is there a quality problem with back riveting as many rivets as are >accessible? Does back riveting provide an equal (or better)amount of >clamping force as face riveting? > >Greg Tanner >RV-9A Empennage >SER #90186 N80BR (APPLIED FOR) > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 26, 2000
From: Mike Thompson <grobdriver(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re:rv6a rudder cables hang up on 602 bulkhead
> > > >Has anyone had the rudder cable cleave hang up on the 602 bulkhead? > And > what > >did you do about it. I am preventing this problem using a six-foot length of plastic stay cover obtained at a local sailboat shop. For $1.75 I got six feet of 3/8 hard plastic tubing with a slit cut along the side. Got one for each side. I was a thumb-numbing process getting this stuff on the rudder cables, but once on, and pulled up firm on the rudder-pedal attachment, the sheath goes back into the baggage side covers. I measured it to be just aft of the F-605s when the rudder pedal was fully forward, then cut it. When the rudder pedal comes fully aft, the plastic still doesn't hit the F606 grommet. The cable is bare behind F606. Since the whole sheath moves with the rudder cable, there is no junction to hang up in F602. Smoooooth! Mike Thompson Austin, TX -6 N140RV (Reserved) Fuselage Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ross Mickey" <rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com>
"Robert L. Nuckolls, III"
Subject: All Electric on a Budget Questions
Date: Sep 26, 2000
Bob, I am going to use the architecture you outlined in your ""All Electric on a Budget" article which also is illustrated as Z-8 in your book. A few questions: 1) Why do you run the SD-8 alternator through the battery bus? I see the logic in running the 12 gauge wire from the shunt of the SD-8 to the battery contactor as this gives you the ability to power items on the main bus with the SD-8 if the battery contactor is closed but why put another set of connections (the battery bus) in between the battery contactor and the essential bus switch? 2) Does the e-bus switch have to be somehow more "heavy duty" since it will be caring all the current? 3) I see you use a SPDT relay to bring the SD-8 on line. If we hooked the e-bus directly to the battery contactor with 12awg, would we need to use a SPDT relay here? 4) Why would you need a loadmeter and shunt for the SD-8 since you would only be using it in emergencies? Now for a different set of questions based on assuming I would want to have the SD-8 on line all the time, not just in emergencies. The reasons for this would be two-fold....since I am caring the weight and the alternator is generating 8-10 volts anyway, why not use it? And secondly, maybe I can make due with a total of 48-50 amps by using both the SD-8 and a 40 amp main alternator. 1) Since the SD-8 would be on line all the time, would I want to keep the loadmeter and shunt for the SD-8 to be able to monitor its health? 2) I would run three pathways to the e-bus. a) One a direct link from the SD-8 shunt using 12 awg and a 16 awg fusible link. (Normal operation: Bringing the SD-8 on line powers the e-bus) b) One from the main bus as is illustrated in Figure Z-8 for normal operations except I would replace the diode with a switch. (SD-8 fails but main alternator is still good and powers both the main and e-bus. Downside...I may have to shed some goodies off the main bus) b) One off of the battery bus through a fuse or directly from the battery contactor. (Both alternators fail and I run the e-bus off the battery) Ross Mickey 6-A Eugene, Oregon ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ross Mickey" <rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com>
"Robert L. Nuckolls, III"
Subject: All Electric on a Budget Questions
Date: Sep 26, 2000
Bob, I am going to use the architecture you outlined in your ""All Electric on a Budget" article which also is illustrated as Z-8 in your book. A few questions: 1) Why do you run the SD-8 alternator through the battery bus? I see the logic in running the 12 gauge wire from the shunt of the SD-8 to the battery contactor as this gives you the ability to power items on the main bus with the SD-8 if the battery contactor is closed but why put another set of connections (the battery bus) in between the battery contactor and the essential bus switch? 2) Does the e-bus switch have to be somehow more "heavy duty" since it will be caring all the current? 3) I see you use a SPDT relay to bring the SD-8 on line. If we hooked the e-bus directly to the battery contactor with 12awg, would we need to use a SPDT relay here? 4) Why would you need a loadmeter and shunt for the SD-8 since you would only be using it in emergencies? Now for a different set of questions based on assuming I would want to have the SD-8 on line all the time, not just in emergencies. The reasons for this would be two-fold....since I am caring the weight and the alternator is generating 8-10 volts anyway, why not use it? And secondly, maybe I can make due with a total of 48-50 amps by using both the SD-8 and a 40 amp main alternator. 1) Since the SD-8 would be on line all the time, would I want to keep the loadmeter and shunt for the SD-8 to be able to monitor its health? 2) I would run three pathways to the e-bus. a) One a direct link from the SD-8 shunt using 12 awg and a 16 awg fusible link. (Normal operation: Bringing the SD-8 on line powers the e-bus) b) One from the main bus as is illustrated in Figure Z-8 for normal operations except I would replace the diode with a switch. (SD-8 fails but main alternator is still good and powers both the main and e-bus. Downside...I may have to shed some goodies off the main bus) b) One off of the battery bus through a fuse or directly from the battery contactor. (Both alternators fail and I run the e-bus off the battery) Ross Mickey 6-A Eugene, Oregon ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Larry Hawkins <lhawkins(at)giant.com>
"'Mike Thompson'"@matronics.com
Subject: Re:rv6a rudder cables hang up on 602 bulkhead
Date: Sep 26, 2000
I am not completely sure I know what you are talking about, but I use heat shrink tubing to dress up the cable connections. slips over the cable then you shrink it down tight. looks real nice. Larry Hawkins RV4 fuse FArmington,NM -----Original Message----- From: Mike Thompson [mailto:grobdriver(at)yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 2:00 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Re:rv6a rudder cables hang up on 602 bulkhead > > > >Has anyone had the rudder cable cleave hang up on the 602 bulkhead? > And > what > >did you do about it. I am preventing this problem using a six-foot length of plastic stay cover obtained at a local sailboat shop. For $1.75 I got six feet of 3/8 hard plastic tubing with a slit cut along the side. Got one for each side. I was a thumb-numbing process getting this stuff on the rudder cables, but once on, and pulled up firm on the rudder-pedal attachment, the sheath goes back into the baggage side covers. I measured it to be just aft of the F-605s when the rudder pedal was fully forward, then cut it. When the rudder pedal comes fully aft, the plastic still doesn't hit the F606 grommet. The cable is bare behind F606. Since the whole sheath moves with the rudder cable, there is no junction to hang up in F602. Smoooooth! Mike Thompson Austin, TX -6 N140RV (Reserved) Fuselage Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 26, 2000
From: Charlie and Tupper England <cengland(at)netdoor.com>
Subject: Re: Weight and Balance-JACKING AIRCRAFT
Charlie and Tupper England Gary Zilik wrote: > > > > > > Or you could not _jack_ it up - and lift it instead. snip> > > > food for thought. The engine lift point is for the engine alone. I have > heard horror stories (none confermed) about the hook ripping out from > the engine case when lifting plane in this manner. > > -- > Gary Zilik - Pine Junction, Colorado > RV-6A N99PZ Flying > Engine: Aerosport Power O-360-A1A > Prop: Sensenich 72FM8S9-1-83 If the top cowl is coming off anyway, a sling (nylon tow strap) on the motor mount tubes at the firewall would work fine. Just don't try to shorten the vertical distance too much. Charlie ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 26, 2000
From: "Builder's Bookstore" <winterland(at)rkymtnhi.com>
Subject: Re: vortex generators
"Builder's Bookstore" OK; Since I've gotten 6 private requests in the last 1/2 hour, here it is for the whole list. The Company who makes VGs is called Micro-Aerodynamics. Their phone number is 360 293 8082. Speak to Annie Brogan or Charlie White. Below is the report I got from the guy who tried them on his RV-4. His was the first set for RVs made by Micro-Aero. Mine will be the 2nd. Andy RV-4 FLIGHT TEST 15 September 2000 RV-4 N91EM Pilot: Richard S. Drury The purpose of these flight tests was to determine the effects of installing the Micro Aerodynamics vortex generators (VGs) on a standard RV-4 aircraft. The airplane has a fixed-pitch Hendrickson wood climb prop and a 160HP Lycoming 0-320 D1A engine. It was flown with full fuel, pilot weight of 170 pounds and a parachute weight of about 30 pounds. It is estimated that the airplane was flying at about 200 pounds below maximum gross weight. The initial flight was flown from Friday Harbor Airport, Friday Harbor, Washington on the morning of 15 September 2000. Wind for takeoff was 170/08, temperature of 16C with an altimeter setting of 30.05 HG. An altitude of 3,000 feet MSL was selected for the stall series to be flown. The Van's Aircraft data states the following: Stalls come with relatively little warning other than the obviously high angle of attack and low speed. However, the break is gentle and control can be regained immediately by relaxing stick back pressure, with an altitude loss of only 25 to 50 feet. With immediate application of power, altitude loss can be held to an almost immeasurable figure. There is little tendency for either wing to drop in a stall unless provoked by a skid or slip. Other data in the Van's brochure points out a stall speed at gross weight of 54 MPH and 48 MPH at solo weight of some 1,160 pounds. Initial stalls were performed at idle power, clean configuration, with a one knot per second airspeed rate decrease. The angle of attack was relatively high. The stall break had little warning except for the angle of attack and control feel. The break itself was mild as the nose fell accompanied by a very slight right wing drop. I attribute the wing drop to a rigging problem which makes this particular airplane slightly right wing heavy as a matter of course. Indicated airspeeds at the break were a high of 56 MPH to a low of 54 MPH - showing the Van's Aircraft data to be accurate and the airplane was flying within some 200 pounds of gross weight. The airspeed indicator is of the general aviation type so these indications are as best as I could determine with most careful reading. Altitude loss was in the 50 foot range with no power added at the stall break. With power added, altitude loss was negligiable. Full flap idle, landing configuration stalls were next. The same high angle of attack was reached and the same sensations were apparent at the break, a generally straight-ahead break preceded by little warning. Indicated speeds were in the 53MPH range. Apparently these flaps cause more drag than low speed advantages. A landing was made at the Roche Harbor, Washington airstrip where the VGs were installed. This process was straightforward and uncomplicated. We used the Micro Aerodynamics suggested placement at 8% MAC. The VGs were temporarily installed with a double-sided sticky tape which worked well using the supplied templates for placement. The next tests were done overhead the Roche Harbor Airport also at 3,000 feet MSL. It was noted, subjectively only at this point, that the takeoff roll was shorter and control response was crisper than before. Initial stalls were once again in the clean configuration, idle power, one knot per second airspeed decrease rate. At approximately 47 MPH there was considerable buffet followed by a break at 44 MPH IAS. The break was definite and straight ahead. Six more stalls validated this speed and buffet phenomenon. Flaps full down, idle power showed an indicated airspeed of 43 MPH. A series of steep turns and rolls was performed to get a feel for any changes to control response. It was felt that roll rate was increased somewhat and turn performance was superior to the un-VGd wing. Thus far, it can be said that the stall speed for this RV-4 has dropped significantly and stall warning is unmistakeable. Although the normal RV-4 has rather benign stall characterists at the onset, this added warning and slower speed can only add to the flight safety envelope. Preliminary tests also indicate no change in cruise speeds at any range of normal power settings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Im7shannon(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 26, 2000
Subject: Re: vortex generators
Wow, I wonder what vortex generators would do to a -9A where the stall speeds are already in the low 40's...... probably could just stop in mid air cartoon style. I think Ill try them on mine someday Kevin -9A waiting for fuse ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "skybolt-aviator" <skybolt-aviator(at)email.msn.com>
Subject: Re: vortex generators
Date: Sep 26, 2000
"skybolt-aviator" ----- Original Message ----- From: "Builder's Bookstore" <winterland(at)rkymtnhi.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 6:43 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: vortex generators HI---Please do keep us posted. Ollie&Lorene Washburn RV6-A,N795LW,@FD77. O-360,180HP,C/S,300+hrs. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: SALNED71(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 26, 2000
Subject: Re:CONSTANT SPEED PROP
When mounting a Hartzell cs prop to the lyc. O360A1A, what is the correct position relative to to engine bolt holes(clock). Thanks in advance !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ed Kowalski ...# 80127 ...RV-8 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 26, 2000
From: Kevin Horton <khorton(at)cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: vortex generators
> >OK; Since I've gotten 6 private requests in the last 1/2 hour, here >it is for the >whole list. > > >The Company who makes VGs is called Micro-Aerodynamics. Their phone >number is 360 >293 8082. Speak to Annie Brogan or Charlie White. > >Below is the report I got from the guy who tried them on his RV-4. >His was the first >set for RVs made by Micro-Aero. Mine will be the 2nd. > >Andy > > >RV-4 FLIGHT TEST 15 September 2000 >RV-4 N91EM >Pilot: Richard S. Drury > <-- whole bunch of good stuff snipped out--> >Altitude loss was in the 50 foot range with no power added at the >stall break. With >power added, altitude loss was negligiable. Full flap idle, landing >configuration >stalls were next. The same high angle of attack was reached and the >same sensations >were apparent at the break, a generally straight-ahead break >preceded by little >warning. Indicated speeds were in the 53MPH range. Apparently these >flaps cause more > >drag than low speed advantages. > One comment - if the aircraft has the aft fuselage static source, flap extension probably changes the airflow around the aft fuselage. This could change the static source position error, making the airspeed error very different flaps down than it is flaps up. IAS at the stall almost universally is way off the CAS anyway, so indicated stall speeds are almost meaningless in terms of quantifying the actual stall speed. Changes in indicated stall speed are usually significant (i.e. if the IAS at the stall decreases, the CAS has probably decreased too), but the change in CAS is probably less than the change in IAS (i.e. the 10 mph reduction in IAS at the stall with the VGs probably equates to less than a 10 mph change in CAS). I have even seen one aircraft where the indicated airspeed on the production instruments would stagnate during a decel to the stall, and then start increasing before the stall. Pretty spooky until you got used to it. The flight test airspeed indicator (nose boom and trailing cone static source) showed a 1 kt/sec decel the whole time. The behavior of the IAS during a stall was not acceptable, and they had to fudge the air data computer to fix it. Bottom line - changes in stall speed are a bitch to measure accurately. These VGs still sound worth looking at though. I'm toying with the idea of rigging a trailing bomb static source to get a good look at my stall speeds once I get flying. <-- more stuff snipped--> >performance was superior to the un-VGd wing. > >Thus far, it can be said that the stall speed for this RV-4 has dropped >significantly and stall warning is unmistakeable. Although the normal RV-4 has >rather benign stall characterists at the onset, this added warning >and slower speed >can only add to the flight safety envelope. > >Preliminary tests also indicate no change in cruise speeds at any >range of normal >power settings > These VGs sound promising, particularly if there really is negligible impact on cruise speed. Keep us posted. -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (misc fuselage stuff) Ottawa, Canada http://members.nbci.com/kevinhorton/rv8.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Robertson" <mrobert569(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re:CONSTANT SPEED PROP
Date: Sep 26, 2000
Ed, Take a look at the engine's prop flange and the hub on the prop itself. You will notice two of the bolt hole lugs on the engine's prop flange that are shorter than the rest. They line up with the two flat areas around the bolts on the prop hub. The rest of the bolts have a recessed area around each bolt. One of the "short" lugs on the engine prop flange is slightly bigger in diameter than the other so your flywheel/ring gear will only go on one way. That is so you can get the timing marks correctly lined up. I hope i got that clear??? Mike Robertson RV-8A N809RS >From: SALNED71(at)AOL.COM >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com, SALNED71(at)AOL.COM >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com, rv-list-digest(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV-List: Re:CONSTANT SPEED PROP >Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 21:08:30 EDT > > >When mounting a Hartzell cs prop to the lyc. O360A1A, what is the correct >position >relative to to engine bolt holes(clock). > > Thanks in advance !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > Ed Kowalski ...# 80127 ...RV-8 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 26, 2000
From: Larry Olson <lolson(at)doitnow.com>
Subject: Intake tubes
Hi Guys, I need 3 ea of a part number 74084W intake tube for a Lycoming 0320. Would prefer used. (P/N 74085 for a 0360 will also work I am told with some trimming) Thanks... Larry Olson Cave Creek, AZ RV6 - Firewall Fwd ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 26, 2000
From: Bob Haan <bhaan(at)easystreet.com>
Subject: WigWag Data Sheets via Acrobat available now
Hi List, The WigWag Solid State, WWSS, leading edge lights control module can be ordered now. Available for download is an Acrobat 2 page data sheet describing the features and benefits of the WWSS. In addition, this data sheet includes the information that is needed to design this WigWag safety function into a proposed panel. The system was spec'ed to be very easy to design-in the WWSS and to wire-up the WWSS for many different lighting functions using one or more switch types and switch combinations. As a result, the WWSS can be easily retro-fit into an existing panel using the existing switch(s). When retro-fitting the WWSS, some builders may be able to replace the existing switches with new switches and/or new functions to not only add the safety function of WigWaging but to reduce the number of switches in the panel thus freeing up a switch position for another function that they have wanted to add to their panel. To access this data sheet go to the bottom of the page at http://www.easystreet.com/~bhaan/ or http://www.easystreet.com/~bhaan/wigwag.pdf We will post pictures of the WWSS to this site in a few days. Regarding the price, when we documented and totaled the costs for all the parts, we discovered that a very redundant, bullet proof, robust design where, if it was better to do it with 2 or more additional components, we designed in the extra components, results in a cost and price that is higher than first estimated by many of us. However, for only 2 of the many advantages; 1. increased safety by being recognized sooner and from a greater distance and 2. ease of installation and wiring, we think the $90 dollars is a very good value. Orders can be placed now by sending a check for $95, $90 plus $5 shipping and handling, to Bob Haan 14270 SW Koven Court Tigard, OR 97224 503-579-3675 If your shipping cost is substantially more than $5, we will bill you for it when we ship. Bob Bob Haan http://easystreet.com/~bhaan/ bhaan(at)easystreet.com Portland, OR RV6A 24461 Wiring the panel ________________________________________________________________________________
From: AV8TURDON(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 26, 2000
Subject: Re: vortex generators
Upon Making an approach and landing who cares what the Calibrated airspeed is. You only read indicated. And if you used to stall at 55 and now at 45 then I would say that's all we need to know. Were not going to the Moon here. This is a basic airplane not an F-22 or the like so lets keep the parameters the in the same arena. There's always someone out there trying to show how smart they are and impress the rest with information that means nothing to this class of aircraft. I plan to install them if the numbers prove to hold up after this person tries the sytem. Besides seat of the pants flying will never be out. This airplane does tell you when it needs more speed. A rebutal is yours. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DBBECK1(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 26, 2000
Subject: Re: vortex generators
any thing avaiable for a rv-3 butch rv3 161bt ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Pat Hatch" <pat_hatch(at)email.msn.com>
Subject: Re: vortex generators
Date: Sep 26, 2000
To Mr. Turdon (or whatever your name is), I've got to jump in here. You are completely off base with this response to Kevin Horton's message on stall speeds. Perhaps you are not aware that Kevin has provided an abundance of useful information to this list including spreadsheets for determining true airspeed, static error, etc. which have tremendous relevance to the construction and flight testing of an RV. Contrary to your description of him, he is not the kind of person who would want to impress anybody and I believe he is motivated solely be a desire to help out his fellow RV builders. I can't imagine what possessed you to make such a rude and cruel comment about a person who has done so much to help out on this list. And I believe you must accurately quantify the benefits, if any, of these vortex generators. By the way, Kevin is a test pilot on the Global Express corporate jet. Pat Hatch RV-4, N17PH @ VRB, 700 hrs. TT O-320, Hartzell C/S RV-6, Fuselage pat_hatch(at)msn.com ----- Original Message ----- From: <AV8TURDON(at)AOL.COM> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 10:46 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: vortex generators > > Upon Making an approach and landing who cares what the Calibrated airspeed > is. You only read indicated. And if you used to stall at 55 and now at 45 > then I would say that's all we need to know. Were not going to the Moon here. > This is a basic airplane not an F-22 or the like so lets keep the parameters > the in the same arena. There's always someone out there trying to show how > smart they are and impress the rest with information that means nothing to > this class of aircraft. I plan to install them if the numbers prove to hold > up after this person tries the sytem. Besides seat of the pants flying will > never be out. This airplane does tell you when it needs more speed. > > A rebutal is yours. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Michael J. Robbins" <kitfox(at)gte.net>
Subject: Re: All Electric : Battery size/Duel alternators
Date: Sep 26, 2000
Ross; I'm going all electric also with dual B&C alternators and will be using an Odyssey (Hawker) PC625. It's a 17ah battery that weighs 13.3 lbs and cost $100. The salesman said it's almost identical to the PC680 that Van's sells for $160 but is a little lighter with slightly less reserve capacity. Got it from Batteries Plus in Oregon. I'm not flying yet so can't give you any performance history. Mike Robbins RV8Q 80591 canopy skirts and stuff Seattle area ----- Original Message ----- From: Ross Mickey <rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 10:13 AM Subject: RV-List: All Electric : Battery size/Duel alternators > > I am building an all electric panel using a B&C 40 amp alternator with the 8 > amp PM alternator as a backup. Since I have two sources of electrical > energy, I am considering downsizing the battery to meet one purpose....start > the engine...an O-360 with constant speed prop. I know most folks are going > with 17ah batteries. Will a smaller one give me adequate cranking capacity? > Assume pre-heat in winter and normal starting temps above 40 degrees. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 26, 2000
From: Jim Cimino <jcimino(at)epix.net>
Subject: Re: Time in RV6 with CFI at OSWEGO FORUM
Dave, Do you have Mike's schedule for Friday? I am scheduled twice on Friday, but I can't remember the times. > >FEW OPENINGS left FOR MIKE SEAGER >Training in RV at KFZY >To reply e-mail John directly to address: > >John.Balbierer(at)nysyra.ang.af.mil > > Openings left for >Sunday, 1 October: 0800, 0930, 1300. >1st come 1st serve................. > >6th Annual Northeast RV Forum >September 30 - October 1, 2000 >Oswego County Airport Fulton NY >KFZY > >Just a reminder on the RV-List inviting people to the RV-Forum and Fly-in. > >Link our web site: >http://www.web-flight.com/486/eaarvforum.htm ><http://www.web-flight.com/486/eaarvforum.htm> > >Please pre-registered so our hand outs and food counts are more accurate. > >As in the past got lots of things planned. > >Hope to see you there >Respectfully >David McManmon > > Jim Cimino RV-8 sn 80039 N7TL Reserved http://www.geocities.com/jcimino.geo (570)842-4057 N.E. Pennsylvania ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6160hp(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 26, 2000
Subject: OSWEGO NY RV FORUM and FLY-IN
DON"T FORGET See you there...... 6th Annual Northeast RV Forum September 30 - October 1, 2000 Oswego County Airport Fulton NY KFZY Just a Quick note on the RV-List inviting people to the RV-Forum and Fly-in. Link our web site: http://www.web-flight.com/486/eaarvforum.htm <http://www.web-flight.com/486/eaarvforum.htm> Please just c'mon and show up now!!!! As in the past got lots of things planned. Hope to see you there Respectfully David McManmon Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 09:28:58 EDT From: RV6160hp(at)aol.com Subject:OSWEGO NY RV FORUM and FLY-IN 6th Annual Northeast RV Forum September 30 - October 1, 2000 Oswego County Airport Fulton NY KFZY Just a Quick note on the RV-List inviting people to the RV-Forum and Fly-in. Link our web site: http://www.web-flight.com/486/eaarvforum.htm <http://www.web-flight.com/486/eaarvforum.htm> Please pre-registered so our hand outs and food counts are more accurate. As in the past got lots of things planned. Hope to see you there Respectfully David McManmon ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jim Sears <sears(at)searnet.com>
Subject: Re: Intake tubes
Date: - - - , 20-
>I need 3 ea of a part number 74084W intake tube for a >Lycoming 0320. Would prefer used. sounds like you're getting closer. You might try Mattituck if you don't find used ones. I've gotten my parts from them cheaper than other places. Jim ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ken Glover" <wirraway(at)bravo.net.au>
Subject: Jon Johanson - Update
Date: Sep 27, 2000
G'Day to all, Jon is in Mauritius. They have finally agreed to his request for a landing clearance for a "technical stop" at Rodrigues. This means Jon can fly from Mauritius, via Rodrigues to Cocos Island without having to go north to the Maldives. This is very good news. Jon is hoping to leave Mauritius later today 0800 UTC 27th or tomorrow 28th at the same time. This depends on forecast winds and other technical matters. I will keep the list informed of progress..........Jon is hoping to arrive in Adelaide, South Australia, his official starting point on Monday 2nd October. Cheers and take care, Ken Glover Hunter Valley Australia ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 27, 2000
From: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv(at)teleport.com>
Subject: Re: Intake tubes
Jim Sears wrote: > > > >I need 3 ea of a part number 74084W intake tube for a > >Lycoming 0320. Would prefer used. > > sounds like you're getting closer. You might try Mattituck if you don't > find used ones. I've gotten my parts from them cheaper than other > places. > > Jim > Another good place to try for used ones is Wentworth. JSpringer ________________________________________________________________________________
From: LeastDrag93066(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 27, 2000
Subject: Re: vortex generators
Is someone developing the gear leg MOD to take advance of the higher angle of attack to land at 45 mph? Jim Ayers RV-3 N47RV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rv660wm(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 27, 2000
Subject: Re: vortex generators
In a message dated 9/26/00 11:31:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time, pat_hatch(at)email.msn.com writes: > I can't imagine what possessed you to make such a rude and cruel > comment about a person who has done so much to help out on this list. > I agree with Pat, Kevin has always bent over backwards to be accomodating to help me with questions and I hope that these type words will not be used on this list for folks who are making an effort to be helpful. Bernie Kerr, 6A 50 hours and holding for painting ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 27, 2000
From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls(at)aeroelectric.com>
Subject: Re: All Electric on a Budget Questions
"Robert L. Nuckolls, III" > >Bob, > >I am going to use the architecture you outlined in your ""All Electric on a >Budget" article which also is illustrated as Z-8 in your book. >A few questions: > >1) Why do you run the SD-8 alternator through the battery bus? I see the >logic in running the 12 gauge wire from the shunt of the SD-8 to the battery >contactor as this gives you the ability to power items on the main bus with >the SD-8 if the battery contactor is closed but why put another set of >connections (the battery bus) in between the battery contactor and the >essential bus switch? The SD-8 is a limited output device and the goal was to maximize its utility in case the main alternator quits. If we're down to the SD-8 as the engine driven power source, then I don't want to waste 1/8th of it's output holding a battery contactor closed. Driving the battery bus direct does not prevent the battery contactor from being closed at will to power up anything on the main bus . . . in fact, once the airport is in sight and comfortable arrival is assured, one may squander what ever energy remains in the battery and show all lights, lower gear electrically, etc. by bringing the main bus up. The architecture shown is intended to MAKE SURE that you get to the airport of intended destination. >2) Does the e-bus switch have to be somehow more "heavy duty" since it >will be caring all the current? All of what current? The e-bus continuous loads during alternator out ops should certainly be no more than the SD-8's output of 8A. An ordinary toggle sw is quite capable of handling this. >3) I see you use a SPDT relay to bring the SD-8 on line. If we hooked >the e-bus directly to the battery contactor with 12awg, would we need to use >a SPDT relay here? The relay does two things . . . it gives you control of an 8A power path without having to bring it into the cockpit . . . it also makes it possible to use the OVM-14 crowbar ov module to protect the system in case of SD-8 regulator failure. >4) Why would you need a loadmeter and shunt for the SD-8 since you would >only be using it in emergencies? All electrical instrumentation other than active notification of low volts and a voltmeter on the e-bus are relatively optional. In some cases, the e-bus may have a full-up load of greater than 8 amps in normal ops and the loadmeter would be useful for educated load-shedding during times that the SD-8 is doing all the engine driven power generation. > >Now for a different set of questions based on assuming I would want to have >the SD-8 on line all the time, not just in emergencies. The reasons for >this would be two-fold....since I am caring the weight and the alternator is >generating 8-10 volts anyway, why not use it? And secondly, maybe I can >make due with a total of 48-50 amps by using both the SD-8 and a 40 amp main >alternator. No, the main alternator should be a minimum of 130% of total max continuous loads for the airplane. The SD-8 runs only when the big guy is compromised. >1) Since the SD-8 would be on line all the time, would I want to keep the >loadmeter and shunt for the SD-8 to be able to monitor its health? >2) I would run three pathways to the e-bus. > a) One a direct link from the SD-8 shunt using 12 awg and a 16 >awg fusible link. (Normal operation: Bringing the SD-8 on line powers the >e-bus) > b) One from the main bus as is illustrated in Figure Z-8 for >normal operations except I would replace the diode with a switch. (SD-8 >fails but main alternator is still good and powers both the main and e-bus. >Downside...I may have to shed some goodies off the main bus) > b) One off of the battery bus through a fuse or directly from >the battery contactor. (Both alternators fail and I run the e-bus off the >battery) Ross, you're certainly free to wire and operate your airplane in any manner you wish. I would only caution that the diagrams we publish are based on a lot of failure modes effects analysis and a goal to maximize performance and dependability while reducing system complexity, weight, cost and installation time. My recommendation is that you utilize figure Z-8 as published. Bob . . . -------------------------------------------- ( Knowing about a thing is different than ) ( understanding it. One can know a lot ) ( and still understand nothing. ) ( C.F. Kettering ) -------------------------------------------- http://www.aeroelectric.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 27, 2000
From: hurd <hurd(at)boernenet.com>
Subject: Re: vortex generators
Builder's Bookstore wrote: > I'll keep you posted > I will be interested to hear if the stall speed reduction will translate into a practicable landing attitude. I was looking seriously at VG's about a year ago (prior to RV4 testing) and was advised by a couple of RV veterans that the higher nose-up attitude would put the tail too low if touching down at stall. Unless I missed it, the test report posted here did not mention landing speed with VG's installed. I hope your experience reveals a slower, but-workable, landing speed because I would really like to put VG's on my plane. Jim RV6A 223JH (tailskid already installed) San Antonio ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 27, 2000
From: Chris Sheehan <ctsheehan(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: vortex generators
I usually don't get involved in flame wars, but I too will throw my hat in the ring in support of Kevin. He repeatedly does a great job of helping us non-professional pilots understand much of the tech stuff, in terms that we can understand. > > Upon Making an approach and landing who cares what the Calibrated airspeed > is. You only read indicated. Mr. AV8TURDON if you were to review the difference between IAS and CAS (which clearly you've forgotten) Kevin's comments might make sense to you. Or perhaps you'd be interested in my special offer airspeed indicator conversion kit which guarantees a 15% increase in IAS - it is a 'KTS' face for your 'MPH' indicator. Since you argue that position error is irrelevant and by extension instrument error probably is too, you can then quote a 15% increase in cruise. Can't guarantee you'll get to your destination any faster though ;-). Only problem is that your stall speed will be back to about where is was without the vortex generators... Chris RV-6 Empennage ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 27, 2000
From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls(at)aeroelectric.com>
Subject: re: Battery size/Dual alternators
"Robert L. Nuckolls, III" > >I am building an all electric panel using a B&C 40 amp alternator with the 8 >amp PM alternator as a backup. Since I have two sources of electrical >energy, I am considering downsizing the battery to meet one purpose....start >the engine...an O-360 with constant speed prop. I know most folks are going >with 17ah batteries. Will a smaller one give me adequate cranking capacity? >Assume pre-heat in winter and normal starting temps above 40 degrees. > >Weight differences: > > 5 amp 4.25 lb 1.17 amps/lb > 7.2 amp 5.45 lbs 1.32 amps/lb > 10 amp 7.85 lbs 1.27 amps/lb > 12 amp 8.41 lbs 1.42 amps/lb > 17 amp 14.3 lbs 1.18 amps/lb > With two alternators, the battery no longe needs to be sized for alternator out endurance. There are batteries out there as light as 3# that will crank an engine. As you have noticed, a lead acid battery has a capacity on the order of 1 a.h. per pound. A 3# battery would be about 3 a.h. Cranking limitations are based on the battery's internal resistance -AND- being able to attach leadwires to the battery that are appropriate for the 200 amps or so needed for cranking. At the present time, I'm aware of only one really light battery with terminals applicable to the task: B&C has a 10 a.h. battery that would work. It's kind of pricey tho . . . my recommendation is a 17-20 a.h. battery in the package offered by a half dozen manufacturers. Panasonic has a 20 a.h. rated battery in the same case as their original 17 a.h. device and for the same weight. This battery is probably bigger than you need but it's inexpensive, readily available from lots of manufacturers and is a reasonable compromise between: (1) maximizing performance/weight at greater expense and (2) the classic 24-35 a.h. batteries carried by most single engine TC aircraft. Bob . . . -------------------------------------------- ( Knowing about a thing is different than ) ( understanding it. One can know a lot ) ( and still understand nothing. ) ( C.F. Kettering ) -------------------------------------------- http://www.aeroelectric.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Parsons" <dap(at)DParsons.com>
Subject: vortex generators
Date: Sep 27, 2000
Maybe this will of interest to the group. I noticed several aircraft at AirVenture 2000 that MVGs installed. When I went t o the NASA tent, they had a give away sheet that talked about them. The URL below is the content of that same document. http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/PAIS/Micro-VG.html The same article is available in PDF format. http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/PAIS/pdf/FS-2000-06-52-LaRC.pdf Don Parsons -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Builder's Bookstore Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 1:44 PM Subject: RV-List: vortex generators I just ordered a set of vortex generators for my 6A from Micro Aerodynamics. I did this based on an RV-4 pilots recent flight report of a 10 mph reduction in stall speed, a nice stall buffet warning about 3 mph before stall, and a noticeable decrease in takeoff roll. And another great benefit; ...it may keep the lookie-loos from sitting on my wings at fly-ins. (or at least they will only sit on them once) I'm looking forward to trying these things. Anything I can do to make lift at our high altitudes has got to be worthy. I'll keep you posted Andy Builder's Bookstore http://buildersbooks.com eCharts http://eCharts.cc ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DWENSING(at)AOL.COM
Date: Sep 27, 2000
Subject: Re: Vinyl in QB Gas Tank
In a message dated 9/26/00 1:01:16 PM Central Daylight Time, dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net writes: << A local builder reported that he discovered vinyl covering still adhered to the inside of his 6A QB wing tank (one of two). He sent it back to Van's for repair. I offer this as a head's up to other QB builders as this is potentially dangerous. >> The heads up to all builders....Van's reported that non-QB builders have also done it. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jones, Bryan D." <bryan.jones@lyondell-citgo.com>
"'Jerry Springer'"@matronics.com
Subject: Intake tubes
Date: Sep 27, 2000
"Jones, Bryan D." <bryan.jones@lyondell-citgo.com>


September 21, 2000 - September 27, 2000

RV-Archive.digest.vol-ji