RV-Archive.digest.vol-ju

- - - , 20- - December 12, 2000



      The cylinder should be sized to easily slip over the TC (or CDI or
      whatever). Its length should ideally be 1.5 X the length of the TC to reduce
      end effects.  By all means purchase it spot welded together because forming
      mu metal causes it to lose its shielding properties.
      
      To save cost, tell the contact you'd like to consider stock "PMT shields".
      These are made in large quantities (over 100 000 per year) and perhaps an
      off-the-shelf item will work.
      
      Dennis Persyk 6A N600DP O360A1A/Hartzell 22 hours
      Hampshire, IL C38
      
      -----Original Message-----
From: Jerry Calvert <rv6bldr(at)home.com>
Date: - - - , 20-
Subject: compass magnetic interference
> >The intruments, switches, cables, etc., are test mounted in the panel to >check all the clearances. Everything fits great and the tip-up frame clears >everything. Time to do a little hanger flying complete with noises! My >fuselage faces due North and a quick check of the compass says we are >heading West! The EGC Turn Coordinator is swinging the compass! The >compass is mounted about 3 inches from the TC. I can remove the TC and the >compass settles back to the North. > >I can switch the compass with another 2 1/4" instrument and try to find a >sweet spot, but I have the compass right where I want it. Any ideas on how >to leave it where it is and make it work???? > >Jerry Calvert >Edmond Ok >-6 fuselage > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bezinque, David" <David_Bezinque(at)MAXTOR.COM>
Subject: RV6 sliding canopy painting question
Date: Dec 07, 2000
I am wondering what the best way is to paint the sliding canopy aluminum parts. I plan to paint the inside surfaces to match the "Polar Grey" of the rest of the cockpit before assembly. I am still not sure what color to paint the airplane, so can I mask off all the Plexiglas and prime and paint the exterior later, after the canopy is assembled? I am especially concerned about the aluminum strip across the top of the canopy. Does any paint that gets under the masking tape affect the Plexiglas? Dave Bezinque RV-6 QB david_bezinque(at)maxtor.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 07, 2000
From: The Razers <razer(at)midwest.net>
Subject: DAR Needed
Richard Lockwood is in need of a DAR to inspect his newly completed 6A. His aircraft is located at the Williamson County Arpt in Marion, IL. Please contact him by phone 618-964-1553. He does not have internet service. chet razer ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Persyk" <dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: DAR Needed
Date: Dec 07, 2000
Chet, I suggest you tell RIchard to talk to his local FISDO or call EAA. Many (most?) FISDOs require the complete paperwork be submitted to them and the FISDO then notifies a DAR that he may inspect the plane. Dennis Persyk went through this last month -----Original Message----- From: The Razers <razer(at)midwest.net> Date: Thursday, December 07, 2000 11:50 AM Subject: RV-List: DAR Needed > >Richard Lockwood is in need of a DAR to inspect his newly completed 6A. >His aircraft is located at the Williamson County Arpt in Marion, IL. >Please contact him by phone 618-964-1553. He does not have internet service. > >chet razer > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 07, 2000
From: KAKlewin(at)AOL.COM
Subject: Re: RV-6 vs hawk
To add to the helmet discussion..during my masters sudies at Central Missouri State University we took a great class on aircraft accident investigation and studied many aircraft accidents that year. One common cause of death to light aircraft pilots and passengers, in very survivable accidents, was trauma to the head caused by the impact of the instrument panel, windshield, controls, or cabin frame. Most of these accidents were forced/emergency landings that suffered from poor execution or hostile terrain (trees!!). Helmets not only protect from bird strikes, but are a great asset in a forced or emergency landing. Ive been skiing for 25 years and finally I see that helmets have become popular in another sport that has the possibility of head injury...Im currently shopping for a ski helmet to protect me from what I have know for years is an activity that could result in a head injury...maybe the sport aviation industry, especially those of us flying aircraft with bubble type! canopys that need a bit more pr otection than a 172 pilot, will go the way of the ski industry and helmet use will increase. Im not close to flying my RV yet..but I would seriously consider a helmet when the time comes. For what thats worth!! Kurt, OKC, OK RV-6A/Finishing Kit MS Aviation Safety/CFI/ATP ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Donald Mei" <don_mei(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Cylinder Head Temp
Date: Dec 07, 2000
Dear Listers, I have an RV-4 with an 0-320. The CHT consistently runs about 350 to 400 degrees. Nothing to be alarmed over, but it seems it could be cooler. I have a single sparkplug gasket thermocouple on the #3 cyl. I recently read that sparkplug gasket thermocouples tend to indicate 75 deg or so higher than probes located in threaded bosses. Have any of you heard of this, or better yet, have experience with both types of probes. Best regards, Don Mei ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Donald Mei" <don_mei(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Engine Preheaters
Date: Dec 07, 2000
Another one for the list: I've been looking for an electric preheater. I think I'll go with the Rief. Any suggestions or enlightenment here is appreciated. My 2nd question is this. Does anyone make a fitted cowling blanket for an RV-4, or should I just drape a sleeping bag over the nose. The sleeping bag is fine in the hangar, but I'm thinking about when I go places and ould like to keep the engine warm durring the time I'm out and about. Best regards, Don Mei "Cold in Connecticut" ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Douglas G. Murray" <dgmurray(at)telusplanet.net>
Subject: Re: Bird strikes
Date: Dec 07, 2000
Just a humorus note on this topic of noise - A good friend of mine just got his RV-6 into the air recently and due to the colder weather here in southern Alberta he thought that he would try out his cabin heat and defroster. He had made the defrost tubing out of left over corrigated tube that Van sells in the wiring kit and thought it was a great application - until he opened the airflow at 180 mph! He said the noise was so loud that he couldn't hear anything even with his head set on! When he told me what had happened I asked him if he had ever seen an elk whistle before - its just a corrigated tube to blow through. That ought to have scared off many flocks of birds :-> Douglas G. Murray Southern Alberta > .......snip > > Wonder if those little ultrasonic whistles you put on the front bumper of > > the car to scare deer will work on birds?? Maybe we need screamin' > > airplanes... literally... :>) > > > > Oh, I like that idea. Didn't the Stuka dive-bombers have something attached > to them that made that awsome sound? ;-) > > Dave ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 07, 2000
From: Ken Balch <kbalch1(at)mediaone.net>
Subject: DAR reviews?
I'm doing a little planning ahead here, but I've started the process of finding a DAR to inspect my airplane next year. I've come up with a list of names, one from the FSDO and five from the FAA website. The EAA was unable to provide a single name in my area. What I'd like to know (from anyone who's used one of these guys): how was the overall process (reasonable, over-picky, etc.); when was your inspection & how much did the guy charge; & how receptive was he to 'special' requests (larger test area, etc.)? The names are: Pete Connor Corky Davison Ray Gonzalez Bill Murphy Ed Delvecchio Paul Delvecchio BTW, these guys are all in the eastern New England area (mostly in MA). -- Regards, Ken Balch Ashland, MA RV-8 #81125 N118KB (reserved) mounting landing gear ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ross Mickey" <rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Engine Preheaters
Date: Dec 07, 2000
> I've been looking for an electric preheater. I think I'll go with the Rief. > Any suggestions or enlightenment here is appreciated. Don, I would assume you have read the articles on the Rief site. I would seriously consider the cylinder head heaters as well. Ross ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "C J Heitman" <cjh(at)execpc.com>
Subject: ACK vs. Ameri-King ELT
Date: Dec 07, 2000
I'm getting ready to order an ELT from Van's. I like the weight savings of the ACK E-01 compared to the Ameri-King AK-450 (about a pound?) but it costs $30 more. Are there any other features besides weight and price that I should consider? Chris Heitman Dousman WI RV-9A N94ME (reserved) Fuselage http://www.execpc.com/~cjh/rv9a.html ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Cylinder Head Temp
Date: Dec 07, 2000
From: Larry Pardue <n5lp(at)carlsbad.net>
> > >Dear Listers, > >I have an RV-4 with an 0-320. The CHT consistently runs about 350 to 400 >degrees. Nothing to be alarmed over, but it seems it could be cooler. I >have a single sparkplug gasket thermocouple on the #3 cyl. I recently read >that sparkplug gasket thermocouples tend to indicate 75 deg or so higher >than probes located in threaded bosses. Have any of you heard of this, or >better yet, have experience with both types of probes. > Don, I don't have any information on the difference a sparkplug gasket thermocouple makes, but with the standard location 350 to 400F would be just about ideal for temperature according to the stuff I read. It is not necessarily cooler is better. In fact 350 might be a little cool. Larry Pardue Carlsbad, NM RV-6 N441LP http://www.carlsbadnm.com/n5lp/index.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Robertson" <mrobert569(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: DAR reviews?
Date: Dec 07, 2000
The reason they may not have listed with the EAA is that these particular DARs may not do Experimental aircraft. There are many that don't. The FSDO does not control this either. It is up to the DAR on what he wants to work on. Do you know if these guys are willing to do, or have done, Experimental aircraft. Mike Robertson RV-8A N809RS >From: Ken Balch <kbalch1(at)mediaone.net> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: "rv-list(at)matronics.com" >Subject: RV-List: DAR reviews? >Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 14:30:16 -0500 > > >I'm doing a little planning ahead here, but I've started the process of >finding a DAR to inspect my airplane next year. I've come up with a >list of names, one from the FSDO and five from the FAA website. The EAA >was unable to provide a single name in my area. What I'd like to know >(from anyone who's used one of these guys): how was the overall process >(reasonable, over-picky, etc.); when was your inspection & how much did >the guy charge; & how receptive was he to 'special' requests (larger >test area, etc.)? The names are: > >Pete Connor >Corky Davison >Ray Gonzalez >Bill Murphy >Ed Delvecchio >Paul Delvecchio > >BTW, these guys are all in the eastern New England area (mostly in MA). > >-- >Regards, >Ken Balch >Ashland, MA >RV-8 #81125 N118KB (reserved) >mounting landing gear > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Weiler" <doug.weiler(at)pressenter.com>
Subject: Re: ACK vs. Ameri-King ELT
Date: Dec 07, 2000
> > I'm getting ready to order an ELT from Van's. I like the weight savings of > the ACK E-01 compared to the Ameri-King AK-450 (about a pound?) but it > costs $30 more. Are there any other features besides weight and price that I > should consider? I purchased the ACK for both my Citabria and RV. I had heard comments about poor customer service from Ameri-King. I don't know how true those comments were, but I am happy with the quality and simplicity of the ACK unit. Doug Weiler Mn Wing ================ Doug Weiler Hudson, WI 715-386-1239 dougweil(at)pressenter.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 07, 2000
From: Ken Balch <kbalch1(at)mediaone.net>
Subject: Re: DAR reviews?
Good point. I've heard that Corky & Ray do inspections on homebuilts. The others I know nothing about. I was holding off on calling them until I received some feedback. Ken Mike Robertson wrote: > > The reason they may not have listed with the EAA is that these particular > DARs may not do Experimental aircraft. There are many that don't. The FSDO > does not control this either. It is up to the DAR on what he wants to work > on. Do you know if these guys are willing to do, or have done, Experimental > aircraft. > > Mike Robertson > RV-8A N809RS > > >From: Ken Balch <kbalch1(at)mediaone.net> > >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > >To: "rv-list(at)matronics.com" > >Subject: RV-List: DAR reviews? > >Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 14:30:16 -0500 > > > > > >I'm doing a little planning ahead here, but I've started the process of > >finding a DAR to inspect my airplane next year. I've come up with a > >list of names, one from the FSDO and five from the FAA website. The EAA > >was unable to provide a single name in my area. What I'd like to know > >(from anyone who's used one of these guys): how was the overall process > >(reasonable, over-picky, etc.); when was your inspection & how much did > >the guy charge; & how receptive was he to 'special' requests (larger > >test area, etc.)? The names are: > > > >Pete Connor > >Corky Davison > >Ray Gonzalez > >Bill Murphy > >Ed Delvecchio > >Paul Delvecchio > > > >BTW, these guys are all in the eastern New England area (mostly in MA). > > > >-- > >Regards, > >Ken Balch > >Ashland, MA > >RV-8 #81125 N118KB (reserved) > >mounting landing gear ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RVPilot4(at)webtv.net (BOBE.)
Date: Dec 07, 2000
Subject: Re: Auto fuel
Don, I know when my 0320E2B is knocking and with (H) 9 to 1 pistons it knocks under load with amocco super priemum unleaded.This is not maybe or guesswork.Under these conditions you may want to stay with 100LL. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rick Caldwell" <racaldwell(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: RVers in So. MS & LA
Date: Dec 07, 2000
I am planning a trip 12/16 west to Houston in my RV-6 and my wife doesn't want to fly straight thru. I am looking for recommendations on where to overnight in southern MS or LA. I'd prefer smaller airports 'cause there're cheaper (usually.) An added bonus would be to meet up with another RV builder/flyer. Any recommendations or places to avoid? TIA, Rick Caldwell -6 164 hrs & trying to see what's over the horizon with those wings Melbourne, FL ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rick Caldwell" <racaldwell(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: RV6-List: RV6 sliding canopy painting question
Date: Dec 07, 2000
David, I painted my canopy after it was assembled. Just removed it from the airplane and masked it off. I'd recommend using 3M fineline tape instead of masking tape around the edges. be sure to press the tape edge down good and no paint will get under. I used PPG Concept paint and there is not any visible detrimental effects on the plastic where the paint touches it. Rick Caldwell -6 165 hrs since 1/12/00 Melbourne, FL >From: "Bezinque, David" <David_Bezinque(at)MAXTOR.COM> >Reply-To: rv6-list(at)matronics.com >To: "'rv6-list(at)matronics.com'" >Subject: RV6-List: RV6 sliding canopy painting question >Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 10:45:35 -0700 > >--> RV6-List message posted by: "Bezinque, David" > > > I am wondering what the best way is to paint the sliding canopy >aluminum parts. I plan to paint the inside surfaces to match the "Polar >Grey" of the rest of the cockpit before assembly. I am still not sure what >color to paint the airplane, so can I mask off all the Plexiglas and prime >and paint the exterior later, after the canopy is assembled? I am >especially >concerned about the aluminum strip across the top of the canopy. Does any >paint that gets under the masking tape affect the Plexiglas? > > >Dave Bezinque >RV-6 QB >david_bezinque(at)maxtor.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 07, 2000
Subject: ACK vs. Ameri-King ELT
From: Don Jordan <dons6a(at)juno.com>
I just installed the AK-450 behind the RH seat. It has to set in a position that the RV don't have room for. It you build a bracket behind the 606 which looked like a JOB to me & run the telephone interface to the control, you will have to cut one end off & crip it back on to route the wire. Same thing on the molded antenia. It was free, so I lived with it , but I would look for something that will fit & look OK in the baggage area. What gets you while trying to get it installed is it is worhtless. 97% of the time it goes off, it is a false alarm, the other 3% & you are likely dead. Don Jordan RV6A Arlington, Tx ***************************************** > > I'm getting ready to order an ELT from Van's. I like the weight > savings of > the ACK E-01 compared to the Ameri-King AK-450 (about a pound?) but > it > costs $30 more. Are there any other features besides weight and > price that I > should consider? > > Chris Heitman > Dousman WI > RV-9A N94ME (reserved) > Fuselage > http://www.execpc.com/~cjh/rv9a.html > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: KBoatri144(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 07, 2000
Subject: Re: RV6 sliding canopy painting question
In a message dated 12/7/00 12:51:12 PM Eastern Standard Time, David_Bezinque(at)MAXTOR.COM writes: > > > > I am wondering what the best way is to paint the sliding canopy > aluminum parts. I plan to paint the inside surfaces to match the "Polar > Grey" of the rest of the cockpit before assembly. I am still not sure what > color to paint the airplane, so can I mask off all the Plexiglas and prime > and paint the exterior later, after the canopy is assembled? I am especially > concerned about the aluminum strip across the top of the canopy. Does any > paint that gets under the masking tape affect the Plexiglas? > > > Dave, On mine, I painted the inside of the pieces before I riveted the thing together. Only a few unpainted shop heads show on the inside. On the outside, I just masked and painted it. No real problem, but you do want to use a sealant or something to form a fillet (or at least a seal) between the aluminum and plexi. Pro-seal works, and there are several other suggestions in the archives. I masked so the primer would extend maybe 1/32 onto the plexi, with the paint going 1/32 beyond that (I may be overstating my masking abilities a little). I think this is an accepted method. Kyle Boatright - Kennesaw, GA RV-6 Slider, O-320/Aymar-Demuth ________________________________________________________________________________
From: KBoatri144(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 07, 2000
Subject: Re: ACK vs. Ameri-King ELT
In a message dated 12/7/00 5:07:16 PM Eastern Standard Time, dons6a(at)juno.com writes: > > > > I'm getting ready to order an ELT from Van's. I like the weight > > savings of > > the ACK E-01 compared to the Ameri-King AK-450 (about a pound?) but > > it > > costs $30 more. Are there any other features besides weight and > > price that I > > should consider? > > > > Chris Heitman > > Dousman WI > > RV-9A N94ME (reserved) > > Fuselage > > http://www.execpc.com/~cjh/rv9a.html > I can't remember which is which, but the longer, skinny one can be mounted in the floorboards between the pilot's and passenger's legs, and will still leave room for a small fire extinguisher mounted alongside. Both the extinguisher and ELT will fit between the center two floor rails, keeping them handy (for the extinguisher), and out of the way of your feet. This is what I did, both for convenince, and w/b issues. Kyle Boatright - Kennesaw, GA RV-6 Slider, O-320/Aymar-Demuth ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RobHickman(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 07, 2000
Subject: RV-4 Paint Job Photo's
Warning! This is what happens when you let your wife and a Graphic Artist modify your paint scheme. I had a nice conservative blue on the top white on the bottom and a checked tail. Randall said do not do anything swoopy, oops http://hometown.aol.com/robhickman/index.html I will update the web page every day so that you can see the progress. -Rob Hickman RV-4 ~100HRS Down for Paint ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Bundy" <ebundy(at)micron.net>
Subject: Re: RV6-List: RV6 sliding canopy painting question
Date: Dec 07, 2000
In fact, when I painted my canopy frame I painted about a 1" strip around the front edge of the canopy plexi (where the cut line is) to cover the pop rivets/spacers from showing when the canopy is open. I used Concept also, and it looks great, didn't harm the Plexi at all, and it doesn't even scratch from sliding under the windscreen fairing. Great stuff. Ed Bundy - Eagle, ID RV6A, 0320-D1a (160hp) Sensenich 70x78, N427EM, 400hrs. ebundy(at)micron.net > I painted my canopy after it was assembled. Just removed it from the > airplane and masked it off. I'd recommend using 3M fineline tape instead of > masking tape around the edges. be sure to press the tape edge down good and > no paint will get under. I used PPG Concept paint and there is not any > visible detrimental effects on the plastic where the paint touches it. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: SportAV8R(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 07, 2000
Subject: Re: Engine making metal
In a message dated 12/07/2000 11:52:41 AM Eastern Standard Time, Johnny(at)wiktel.com writes: > Bill, > > My heart goes out to you... same thing happened to me a year ago last July > at about 240 SMOH. The cam was eating itself up on the "double pusher" > lobes, and the lifters were badly pitted. We suspect long periods of not > getting run in the airplane's past somewhere. Johnny: thanks, old man. I'm not really sure where this is all headed. I'm at 155 hrs since the major, in which we returned the cam to service after magnaflux and dimensional inspection. The lifters were odd-lot units from the parts drawer at the overhauler's shop... perhaps a troubling sign in retrospect. Polishing and cleaning these lifters and assembling them into the bodies was one of the few parts of the o'haul I helped with myself. I have used break in oil, later Aero-shell 15w-50, and never gone long periods between flights (never idle more than 3 weeks, usually fly 1-2x/week) but I do have an oil sump Reiff heater which I often leave plugged in continuously in the hangar. Some say this invites condensation and rust in the upper reaches of the case. I may get to find out! My engine has really been making more or less the same amount of metal since the overhaul was completed (and it was in very fine shape at the tear down when it had 2000 hrs on it.) The flakes are mostly all fine shiny magnetic pieces that look like silver glitter. I'd say if you crushed single coffee bean, you'd have a volume of crumbs equal to the metal I'm getting from the screen every 25 hrs. The jury is still out on the engine's general health, as I have only now started to document and track the static run-up max rpm, and am due for a compression check. I have oil samples saved from the last 3 changes, but have not sent them for analysis yet (too cheap to spend the bux and too lazy to order the kit unless I need to know later.) Our plan for now is to check the oil screen every 5 hours or so and do a compression test this weekend, while monitoring engine power by the static rpm measurements. If the metal does not slack off, a diagnostic teardown will be inevitable. I'm hoping it's a scored jug, but like you, we suspect a cam failure, in which case the engine should lose power and the wear should accelerate, with ever more metal showing up. I wonder if some of the metal is just picked up from the sump and trapped long after it was made during break-in. But then I can't say why it isn't drained out during oil changes. Just wishful thinking, I suppose. I'm bracing myself for a $550 cam and $175 set of lifters, plus new main bearings (likely metal contamination) and labor. Ouch! Operating costs per hour just spiked! I will let the list know how this turns out. Bill Boyd RV-6A O-320/FP Sensenich Hop-Along Airfield - 12VA Clifton Forge, VA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Engine Preheaters
Date: Dec 08, 2000
> >I've been looking for an electric preheater. I think I'll go with the >Rief. > Any suggestions or enlightenment here is appreciated. > >My 2nd question is this. Does anyone make a fitted cowling blanket for an >RV-4, or should I just drape a sleeping bag over the nose. The sleeping >bag >is fine in the hangar, but I'm thinking about when I go places and ould >like >to keep the engine warm durring the time I'm out and about. > >Best regards, > >Don Mei Don, FWIW, a simple, Home Depot type electric shop heater with a duct attached to it works GREAT for keeping your engine toasty warm 24/7 while in your hangar. I spent a whopping $35 to put one together (heater, duct flange and length of clothes dryer duct) and I just leave it on, with foam plugs in the cowling inlets to keep the heat in. I arrive in the morning to a fully warmed engine compartment ready to start. For out of town trips, the permanently installed Reif type of system is certainly more practical, but how often do you leave your airplane tied down outside, during the winter? I would rather pay for a preheat from the FBO where I have the plane parked than to pay for an engine preheater system that is on the plane (read: being hauled around as useless weight) year round. Agreed, our winters in NM aren't nearly as brutal as up north, but it still gets me by when the nighttime temps drop into the teens. After I pull the foam plugs, I can put my hands on the cylinder fins inside the inlets and it is noticeably warm, as well as the top of the cowling. Heating the entire engine compartment serves another benefit in some RV-8's: warms the firewall mounted battery...which does wonders to help keep the electrons in it. ;) Best of luck in your decision. Brian Denk RV8 N94BD 159 hrs. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Shook" <billshook(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: RV-4 Paint Job Photo's
Date: Dec 07, 2000
Wow! I have to say that is one seriously beautiful paint job. Damn, I really like it. Being on a -4 just endears it to my heart even more... Very nice, very very nice...... Bill -4 wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jim Sears <sears(at)searnet.com>
Subject: Re: Auto fuel
Date: - - - , 20-
Listers, Don has made some good observations which I'd like to add to, if I may. I've had a tad more than five months experience with my -6A. >>1)I have an 0-320 in my RV-4 - 150Hp and have been playing around with auto fuel for the last 5 months. I keep 80 octane in the left wing and 93 octane in the right wing. I am very careful to takeoff and land on the aviation fuel. (maybe its unnecessary but I'll err on the conservative side) I've never noticed any difference in how the engine ran while on the auto fuel. Same CHT, egt.<< Boy, is that 80 octane avgas rare around here! :-) In my case, I've been running 87 octane in my 150hp engine because I know from experience that it's just fine for it. I don't run avgas in mine unless I need to give mine that periodic infusion of lead that we've read so much about. That's done at about fifty tach hour intervals. The only difference I've ever seen relates to vapor locking at fast turn arounds. The 100LL avgas is less prone to do it. BTW, I did run 100LL in mine for about ten hours when I first started flying my RV. I probably should have gone a bit longer than that; but, I've seen no ill effects from not going longer. The engine seemed to be breaking in just fine, by that time. Since then, I've put 100LL in it once at about 50 hours. >>2) I don't know enough to separate the truth from the old wives tales regarding what Auto fuel can do to fuel system components such as gaskets and seals in the carb. So I play it safe. That is why I switch before landing. My carburetor experiences about 3 hours a week of auto fuel, and all the time spent sitting on the ground is with Avgas in all parts of the fuel system downstream of the fuel valve.<< From day one of using auto gas in my airplanes I never worried about that. I figured that FAA's approval showed it had passed that just fine. I remember one time when I did have a composite carb float sink on my C172. I had been using auto gas for some time. That same week, the local club C172 had the same thing happen. It had always had avgas in it. I've been using auto gas in my airplanes since 1986. So far, it's been goodness. Any problems I've had with the engine has been attributed to something else. BTW, you'll find that most of the wives tales about auto gas come from those who sell avgas. They lose money when we buy auto gas. Think about that. Then, if they can get others to help fan the fires by spreading that around, all the better for them. In jest, our local FBO manager is constantly claiming I'm going to crash and burn one day because I run that old car gas in my airplane. He also admits he'd be doing the same thing if he had an airplane. :-) My IA has been a strong supporter of my use of auto gas. >>3) I am alarmed at the amount of WATER in auto fuel. When I first started using it, I would regularly sump out a marble sized ball of water out of the Auto fuel tank and get nothing out of the wing that had been filled with avgas. I've since purchased one of those "super funnels" that has a hydrophobic filter that actually doesn't pass water. It works well, I regularly have to stop fueling to clean the filter element. I'm not getting water in the sump now so it seems to be working. As a note, I've experienced water in the fuel at several stations in my area.<< Keep looking until you find one that doesn't. I buy gas from several stations; but, I favor the one around the corner just because it's a Shell station and is convenient. All are high volume self serve stations. I never find water in either tank unless I've accidentally let it get in there when some was around the caps. I usually blow around them when I know they're wet; but, I sometimes let some in. If you're having that much problem with water in the gas around your area, you must also be getting it in your autos. Maybe you should consider putting some additive in your auto tanks to get the water out of them. >>4) I did my annual last month. The AI who assisted (I didn't build my plane) was impressed with how clean the plugs were. I can only assume that the auto fuel and the fact that I lean aggressively on the ground were factors.<< It's mostly the auto fuel that gets the credit. Another thing. The 80 octane avfuel has a lot less lead than 100LL. In fact, I think I remember it's being about 25% the lead content of 100LL. With that, you won't see much lead on the plugs. At our FBO, 100LL is $2.66 per gallon. I'm currently paying about $1.40 per gallon for 87 octane Shell. That's about $10 per hour savings. As much as some of you fly, like Don's three hours per week, that can add up to a substantial savings. In fact, that savings goes a long way toward paying for other things like insurance. I've saved more than enough over the years to pay for an overhaul; but, I like to say my insurance is free each year. :-) I hope that helps. Jim Sears in KY RV-6A N198JS ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Van Artsdalen, Scott" <svanarts(at)unionsafe.com>
Subject: RV-4 Paint Job Photo's
Date: Dec 07, 2000
I think I see a nominee for Van's calendar! That is a gorgeous paint job! I may do something similar! Please let us know when you have pictures of your plane fully assembled with the new paint! Consider putting a large format picture up on your web site. I would like to use it as wallpaper. Give me some inspiration in building my RV-4. -- Scott VanArtsdalen, MCSE, CCNA Network Administrator Union Safe Deposit Bank 209-946-5116 -----Original Message----- From: RobHickman(at)AOL.COM [mailto:RobHickman(at)AOL.COM] Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 3:02 PM To: rv-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RV-List: RV-4 Paint Job Photo's Warning! This is what happens when you let your wife and a Graphic Artist modify your paint scheme. I had a nice conservative blue on the top white on the bottom and a checked tail. Randall said do not do anything swoopy, oops http://hometown.aol.com/robhickman/index.html I will update the web page every day so that you can see the progress. -Rob Hickman RV-4 ~100HRS Down for Paint ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 07, 2000
From: Thomas McIntyre <bogeybrother(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Cylinder Head Temp
Ive flown with both installed at the same time. the sparkplug thermocouples ran 85 degrees hotter. Tom RV3 1700+ hours Northern California Donald Mei wrote: > > Dear Listers, > > I have an RV-4 with an 0-320. The CHT consistently runs about 350 to 400 > degrees. Nothing to be alarmed over, but it seems it could be cooler. I > have a single sparkplug gasket thermocouple on the #3 cyl. I recently read > that sparkplug gasket thermocouples tend to indicate 75 deg or so higher > than probes located in threaded bosses. Have any of you heard of this, or > better yet, have experience with both types of probes. > > Best regards, > Don Mei > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 07, 2000
From: Ed Hobenshield <edhob(at)kermode.net>
Subject: Re: Auto fuel
> > >5) There has been a lot of discussion about the applicability of auto fuel >in higher compression engines. (200 hp IO360, 160hp 0320) The reality is >that any decent engine shop with a properly instrumented dyno can determine >the octane requirements of an engine. >Don Mei >RV-4 N92CT > >Intresting Don, We have been using a mix off 60% 100LL & 40% auto in >the 160 HP 320 & 300 HP 185 Cessna. The 185 was sold at 1800 Hrs TT >and only had one cyl requiring minor work at 1500 Hrs. 0-320 to be >checked this spring at 500 hrs and may need 1 cyl worked as while >cold it has less compression felt on the blades but is even once up >to temp. We routed the fuel in a return system on the 6 to avoid vapor lock. Neither aircraft displayed measured problems by the temps or vapor lock yet. Luck? Hell if it screws up determine it on the ground! Maybe some-one else does the same? Ed Hobenshield ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Allignment of wings
Date: Dec 07, 2000
Thread-Topic: RV-List: Allignment of wings Thread-Index: AcBgrpeyfhHnIG8tTe2l3n9yMX8/nAAEGNVT
From: "Bob Japundza" <Bob.Japundza(at)realmed.com>
SXQgc3VyZSBsb29rcyBsaWtlIGl0cyBtb3Zpbmcgd2hlbiBpdCBpcyBzdGFuZGluZyBzdGlsbC4u LmhlaA0KaGVoLi4uLlNlcmlvdXNseSB0aG91Z2gsIHRha2UgeW91ciB0aW1lIHdoZW4gcmlnZ2lu ZyB5b3VyIHdpbmdzOyAgdGhleQ0Kd29uJ3QgbW92ZS4gIEkgZmVsdCBpdCBkaWRuJ3QgaHVydCB0 byBtZWFzdXJlIGV2ZXJ5dGhpbmcgMTAgdGltZXMgYW5kDQpkcmlsbCBvbmNlLiAgTXkgd2luZ3Mg YXJlbid0IHBlcmZlY3RseSBhbGlnbmVkLCBidXQgSSBjYW4gc2xlZXAgd2VsbCBhdA0KbmlnaHQu DQogDQpCb2INCmRvIG5vdCBhcmNoaXZlDQoNCgktLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLSAN CglGcm9tOiBHcmVnIFRhbm5lciANCglTZW50OiBUaHUgMTIvNy8yMDAwIDU6MTQgUE0gDQoJVG86 IHJ2LWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbSANCglDYzogDQoJU3ViamVjdDogUkU6IFJWLUxpc3Q6IEFs bGlnbm1lbnQgb2Ygd2luZ3MNCgkNCgkNCg0KCS0tPiBSVi1MaXN0IG1lc3NhZ2UgcG9zdGVkIGJ5 OiAiR3JlZyBUYW5uZXIiDQo8Z3Rhbm5lckBiZW5kY2FibGUuY29tPg0KCQ0KCVdoeSBkbyB5b3Ug c2V0IGl0IHRoZW4gd2FpdCBhbmQgcmVjaGVjay0tZG9lcyBpdCBtb3ZlIG92ZXIgdGltZT8NCgkN CglHcmVnIFRhbm5lcg0KCQ0KCS0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQoJRnJvbTogb3du ZXItcnYtbGlzdC1zZXJ2ZXJAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbQ0KCVsgbWFpbHRvOm93bmVyLXJ2LWxpc3Qt c2VydmVyQG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb21dT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mIEJvYg0KSmFwdW5kemENCglTZW50OiBU aHVyc2RheSwgRGVjZW1iZXIgMDcsIDIwMDAgNzowNCBBTQ0KCVRvOiBydi1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmlj cy5jb20NCglTdWJqZWN0OiBSRTogUlYtTGlzdDogQWxsaWdubWVudCBvZiB3aW5ncw0KCQ0KCQ0K CS0tPiBSVi1MaXN0IG1lc3NhZ2UgcG9zdGVkIGJ5OiAiQm9iIEphcHVuZHphIg0KPEJvYi5KYXB1 bmR6YUByZWFsbWVkLmNvbT4NCgkNCglCZXJ0LA0KCQ0KCVdoZW4gSSB3YXMgZG9pbmcgbXkgZmlu YWwgYXNzZW1ibHksIG5vIG1hdHRlciB3aGF0IEkgdHJpZWQsIEkNCmNvdWxkIG5vdA0KCWdldCB0 aGUgcGx1bWIgYm9icyB0byBmYWxsIGFueSBjbG9zZXIgdGhhbiAxLzIiLiAgV2hlbiBJIGNhbGxl ZA0KVG9tIEANCglWYW4ncywgaGUgc2FpZCB0aGF0IEkgd2FzIHNwbGl0dGluZyBoYWlycyBhbmQg c29tZW9uZSBhdCBWYW4ncw0KaGFzIGZsb3duDQoJYSBjdXN0b21lciBhaXJwbGFuZSB0aGF0IHdh cyBvZmYgYnkgMyIgKCEhISkgaW4gc3dlZXAgYW5kIHRoZXkNCmNvdWxkDQoJbm90aWNlIG5vIGls bCBlZmZlY3RzLiAgTXkgYWlycGxhbmUgZmxpZXMgYW5kIHN0YWxscyBzdHJhaWdodC4NCkdldA0K CXRoaW5ncyBhcyBjbG9zZSBhcyB5b3UgY2FuLCBidXQgdGhlIG1haW4gY29uc2lkZXJhdGlvbnMg YXJlIGVkZ2UNCglkaXN0YW5jZSBvbiB0aGUgcmVhciBzcGFyIGF0dGFjaCBhbmQgeW91ciBpbmNp ZGVuY2UgYW5nbGUuIA0KCQ0KCVRvIG1ha2UgbGlmZSBlYXNpZXIgZm9yIHlvdSwgSSBmb2xsb3dl ZCBNYXJrIEZyZWRlcmljaydzDQpzdWdnZXN0aW9ucw0KCXdoaWNoIHdvcmtlZCB3ZWxsIGFuZCBt YWRlIHRoZSBqb2IgZWFzeS4gIEkgdXNlZCB0aGUgbWFpbg0KYnV0dC1qb2ludA0KCWFsb25nIHRo ZSBzcGFyIGFzIGEgcmVmZXJlbmNlLCBhbmQgaHVuZyB0aGUgcGx1bWIgYm9icyBieQ0KaW5zZXJ0 aW5nIHRoZQ0KCXN0cmluZyBpbiB0aGUgc2VhbSBhdCB0aGUgdGlwIGFuZCB0aGUgY29ybmVyIG9m IHRoZSB0YW5rIHNraW4gYXQNCnRoZQ0KCXJvb3QuICBUaGF0IHdheSwgeW91ciB3aGVlbHMvd2hl ZWxwYW50cyB3b24ndCBpbnRlcmZlcmUgd2hlbg0Kc2lnaHRpbmcNCglkb3duIHRoZSBsaW5lLiAg SSBhbHNvIHRvb2sgdHdvIGNoYWlycyBhbmQgcGxhY2VkIHRoZW0gYXQgdGhlDQp0aXBzIHdpdGgN CglhIHN0cmluZyB0aWVkIHRvIGEgbGVnIG9uIGVhY2ggYWJvdXQgMSIgb2ZmIHRoZSBncm91bmQu ICBJIG1vdmVkDQp0aGVzZQ0KCWFyb3VuZCBjYXJlZnVsbHkgdG8gbWFrZSB0aGUgc3RyaW5nIHRh dWdodCBhbmQgZmFsbCBleGFjdGx5DQp1bmRlciB0aGUNCgl0aXAgcGx1bWItYm9icy4gIEkgbWVh c3VyZWQgdGhlIHN3ZWVwIGF0IHRoZSB0YWlsd2hlZWwgYm9sdCwNCmFkanVzdGVkDQoJdGhlIHdp bmdzLCBhbmQgd2VudCBob21lLiAgVGhlIG5leHQgZGF5IEkgY2FtZSBiYWNrIG91dCBhbmQNCmNo ZWNrZWQNCglldmVyeXRoaW5nIHRoZW4gc2V0IHRoZSBpbmNpZGVuY2UgYW5kIGxlZnQgYWdhaW4g Zm9yIHRoZQ0KZXZlbmluZy4NCglBbm90aGVyIGRheSBwYXNzZWQsIEkgY2hlY2tlZCBldmVyeXRo aW5nIGFnYWluIHRoZW4gZHJpbGxlZCB0aGUNCnJlYXINCglzcGFyLiAgQmUgcGF0aWVudCBhbmQg YmUgcGlja3ksIGJlY2F1c2UgeW91IG9ubHkgZ2V0IG9uZSBzaG90IGF0DQpkb2luZw0KCXRoaXMg c2VxdWVuY2UgY29ycmVjdGx5Lg0KCQ0KCUJvYiBKYXB1bmR6YQ0KCVJWLTYgTjI0NEJKIE8tMzYw Qy9TIGZseWluZyA2MyBob3Vycw0KCQ0KCT4gLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCgk+ IEZyb206IGJlcnQgbXVyaWxsbyBbIG1haWx0bzpiZXJ0cnY2QHlhaG9vLmNvbV0NCgk+IFNlbnQ6 IFdlZG5lc2RheSwgRGVjZW1iZXIgMDYsIDIwMDAgNTozNyBQTQ0KCT4gVG86IFJ2LUxJc3RAbWF0 cm9uaWNzLmNvbQ0KCT4gU3ViamVjdDogUlYtTGlzdDogQWxsaWdubWVudCBvZiB3aW5ncw0KCT4N Cgk+DQoJPiAtLT4gUlYtTGlzdCBtZXNzYWdlIHBvc3RlZCBieTogYmVydCBtdXJpbGxvDQo8YmVy dHJ2NkB5YWhvby5jb20+DQoJPg0KCT4gICBIZWxsbzoNCgk+DQoJPiAgICAgIEZvciB0aG9zZSB3 aG8gYWxyZWFkeSBoYXZlIGFsaWduZWQgdGhlIHdpbmdzDQoJPiAgZmlyc3QgdGltZS4uLkkgYW0g aGF2aW5nIHRyb3VibGUgd2l0aCB0aGlzIHRhc2suLg0KCT4gICAgO0Nhbm5vdCBhbGlnbiB0aGVt OyAgS2VlcCBnZXR0aW5nLCBhYm91dCAxLzIiDQoJPiAgb2ZmLiAgSWYgdGlwcyBhcmUgYWxpZ24s IHRoZSByb290IGVuZCBpcyBub3QsIGFuZA0KCT4gdmljZXZlcnNhLg0KCT4gICAgICAgIEhhdmUg YW55IG9uZSBoYWQgdHJvdWJsZSB3aXRoIHRoaXMsIGFuZCBob3cNCgk+IGl0IHdhcyBzb2x2ZT8N Cgk+DQoJPiAgICAgIEFueSBzdWdnZXN0aW9ucz8gSSBoYXZlIG5vdCBjYWxsZWQgdmFuJ3MgeWV0 Lg0KCT4NCgk+ICAgICANCgk+IHRoYW5rcw0KCT4NCgk+IEJlcnQNCgk+DQoJPiAgIHJ2NmEgUS5C DQoJPg0KCT4NCgk+IERvIE5PdCBhcmNoaXZlDQoJPg0KCT4NCgk+DQoJPg0KCT4NCgk+DQoJPg0K CQ0KCQ0KCV8tPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09DQoJXy09IFRoZSBSVi1MaXN0IGlzIHNwb25zb3JlZCBieSBNYXRyb25pY3Mg YW5kIHRocm91Z2gNCglfLT0gdGhlIGdlbmVyb3VzIENvbnRyaWJ1dGlvbnMgb2YgTGlzdCBtZW1i ZXJzLg0KCV8tPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09DQoJXy09IExpc3QgUmVsYXRlZCBXZWIgU2l0ZXMNCglfLT0gIE1hdHJvbmlj czogICAgIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS8NCglfLT0gIExpc3QgU3BlY2lmaWM6IGh0 dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9ydi1saXN0DQoJXy09ICBTdWJzY3JpcHRpb246ICBodHRw Oi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vc3Vic2NyaWJlDQoJXy09ICBTZWFyY2ggRW5naW5lOiBodHRw Oi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vc2VhcmNoDQoJXy09ICBEb3dubG9hZDogICAgICBodHRwOi8v d3d3Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vYXJjaGl2ZXMNCglfLT0gIENvbnRyaWJ1dGlvbnM6IGh0dHA6Ly93 d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9jb250cmlidXRpb24NCglfLT0gIE90aGVyIExpc3RzOiAgIGh0dHA6 Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9lbWFpbGxpc3RzDQoJXy09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0NCglfLT0gU2VjdXJlIE9ubGlu ZSBPcmRlcmluZyBOb3cgQXZhaWxhYmxlIGF0IE1hdHJvbmljcyENCglfLT0gIFBsYWNlIHlvdXIg b3JkZXIgb25saW5lIGFuZCBzYXZlIDUlIC0NCglfLT0gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGh0dHA6Ly93 d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9vcmRlcg0KCV8tPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09DQoJDQoJDQoJDQoJDQoJDQoNCg= ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6ARC(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 07, 2000
Subject: Re: Engine Preheaters
Hi Don, In regard to your question about engine heaters I had two Hot Pads in my Mooney and both of them burned out in about 3yrs each. I bought a SYMTEC engine heater from AC Spruce for $150.00 and am going on my 4th year. The heater in mounted on an aluminum plate and if you get oil under it won't burn out like the others. I am very happy with mine and will not buy any other kind. Hope this helps. Bob RV6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 11, 2000
From: wvu(at)mail.ameritel.net
Subject: Re: compass magnetic interference
Jerry, I didn't build my -6 but the builder claimed he had similar problems when the compass was installed in the location you mentioned. It is still on the panel but now directly underneath the canopy release T-handle and works fine. Before moving your compass to a different location, I'd try to demagnetize the entire cockpit if you can get a hold of a demagnetizer to see if that helps. Also, there are two screws on the compass which will help you minimize errors by position your a/c on the cardinal headings and take out 1/2 of the error at a time. Anh N985VU -6 Maryland > >The intruments, switches, cables, etc., are test mounted in the panel to >check all the clearances. Everything fits great and the tip-up frame clears >everything. Time to do a little hanger flying complete with noises! My >fuselage faces due North and a quick check of the compass says we are >heading West! The EGC Turn Coordinator is swinging the compass! The >compass is mounted about 3 inches from the TC. I can remove the TC and the >compass settles back to the North. > >I can switch the compass with another 2 1/4" instrument and try to find a >sweet spot, but I have the compass right where I want it. Any ideas on how >to leave it where it is and make it work???? > >Jerry Calvert >Edmond Ok >-6 fuselage > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ENewton57(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 07, 2000
Subject: Filling Mis-Drilled Holes
I tried the archives and can't get it to work for some reason, so here is a question. Has anyone had success in filling mis-drilled holes (3/32") in skins with something other than a rivet? For instance J-B Weld , Bondo or Super Fill? I know that when I worked in a paint and body shop, some fender dents required drilling holes, using a screw in puller to pull the dent out and then filling the holes with Bondo. The skins I'm referrring to are the Turtle deck skins so are very visible. Thanks for helping out a new learner and imperfect soul. Eric Newton - Long Beach, Mississippi RV-6A N57ME (Reserved) (Fuselage - skinning turtle deck) Eric's RV-6A Construction Page ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "elizabeth lincoln" <curby1(at)shianet.org>
Subject: Re: Auto fuel
Date: Dec 07, 2000
Don where did you get your funnel Andy ----- Original Message ----- From: Donald Mei <don_mei(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 5:07 PM Subject: RV-List: Auto fuel > > I have been listening to the discussion on the use of auto fuel and have a > couple of things to add. No real conclusions, just information. > > 1)I have an 0-320 in my RV-4 - 150Hp and have been playing around with auto > fuel for the last 5 months. I keep 80 octane in the left wing and 93 octane > in the right wing. I am very careful to takeoff and land on the aviation > fuel. (maybe its unnecessary but I'll err on the conservative side) I've > never noticed any difference in how the engine ran while on the auto fuel. > Same CHT, egt. > > 2) I don't know enough to separate the truth from the old wives tales > regarding what Auto fuel can do to fuel system components such as gaskets > and seals in the carb. So I play it safe. That is why I switch before > landing. My carburetor experiences about 3 hours a week of auto fuel, and > all the time spent sitting on the ground is with Avgas in all parts of the > fuel system downstream of the fuel valve. > > 3) I am alarmed at the amount of WATER in auto fuel. When I first started > using it, I would regularly sump out a marble sized ball of water out of the > Auto fuel tank and get nothing out of the wing that had been filled with > avgas. I've since purchased one of those "super funnels" that has a > hydrophobic filter that actually doesn't pass water. It works well, I > regularly have to stop fueling to clean the filter element. I'm not getting > water in the sump now so it seems to be working. As a note, I've > experienced water in the fuel at several stations in my area. > > 4) I did my annual last month. The AI who assisted (I didn't build my > plane) was impressed with how clean the plugs were. I can only assume that > the auto fuel and the fact that I lean aggressively on the ground were > factors. > > 5) There has been a lot of discussion about the applicability of auto fuel > in higher compression engines. (200 hp IO360, 160hp 0320) The reality is > that any decent engine shop with a properly instrumented dyno can determine > the octane requirements of an engine. If the need arose someone like > Mattituck could determine if an IO-360 could run on unleaded 93 in short > order. Just set up the instrumentation, run the engine under varying loads > and temperatures and look for the signs of knock and/or pre-ignition. If > you can run it hard and hot on 93 octane and it doesn't show problems then > you move forward, which I would think would be instrumented testing in an > airframe. There has been a lot of conjecture like "well an 0-320 with high > compression pistons can't use auto fuel" I don't think anyone really knows > that. Its just that until we know that IT CAN use auto fuel, it isn't > prudent to try. > > Just my 2 cents. > > Don Mei > RV-4 N92CT > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Are Barstad" <abarstad(at)bconnex.net>
Subject: Do we prime Platenuts?
Date: Dec 07, 2000
I tried to search for this in the archives, but it seem to be down right now. Does anyone prime the platenuts? They seem to be treated with something already since they have a dark color to them - almost like bluing on a gun's barrel. Are RV-8 Wings C-GQRV (Reserverd) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 07, 2000
From: Kevin Horton <khorton(at)cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: marhyde/veriprime compatiblity
> >Hi Folks, >I'm a "Newbie" here and learning as I go. What is "Marhyde"? Obviously an >aerosol primer but who makes it. Where can I buy it? I just tried using >Tempo zinc chromate and had an absolute mess. >Dennis Thomas >RV-9A Emp > Mar-hyde Self-Etching Primer can be bought at many auto body supply places. It comes in spray bombs, and quart and gallon cans. It is used by many builders because it is easy to use, and has a nice grey colour. It is probably not the best choice if you are really worried about corrosion, but it might be an acceptable choice in many parts of the country. It is made by the Bondo Mar-hyde company. -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (fuselage 95% done) Ottawa, Canada
http://eccentrix.com/misc/rv8/rv8.html ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 07, 2000
From: Bill Ervin <bjervin(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: ACK vs. Ameri-King ELT
Don't know about their ELTs, but I had nothing but problems with Amri-King's Encoder, I sent it back 4 times and continued to get the same problem and the same excuse (it must be something you or your tech are doing). And the person I talked to couldn't even speak good english. I'm not impressed. Bill RV-6 Fuse Doug Weiler wrote: > > > > > > I'm getting ready to order an ELT from Van's. I like the weight savings of > > the ACK E-01 compared to the Ameri-King AK-450 (about a pound?) but it > > costs $30 more. Are there any other features besides weight and price that > I > > should consider? > > I purchased the ACK for both my Citabria and RV. I had heard comments about > poor customer service from Ameri-King. I don't know how true those comments > were, but I am happy with the quality and simplicity of the ACK unit. > > Doug Weiler > Mn Wing > > ================ > Doug Weiler > Hudson, WI > 715-386-1239 > dougweil(at)pressenter.com > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: SportAV8R(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 07, 2000
Subject: Re: ACK vs. Ameri-King ELT
In a message dated 12/07/2000 11:38:13 PM Eastern Standard Time, bjervin(at)home.com writes: > Don't know about their ELTs, but I had nothing but problems with > Amri-King's Encoder, I sent it back 4 times and continued to get the > same problem and the same excuse (it must be something you or your tech > are doing). And the person I talked to couldn't even speak good english. > I'm not impressed. > I will second this experience, but in my case it was the ELT. The engineer in charge is almost incomprehensible. The secretary is a nice empathetic lady who seems to know how to get him to snap-to. Caution advised. Bill Boyd RV-6A O-320/Sensenich FP Hop-Along Air Field, 12VA Clifton Forge, VA ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 07, 2000
From: gert <gert(at)execpc.com>
Subject: Re: Do we prime Platenuts?
here's a message I saved a while ago on that subjetc Gert VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV Listers, I've purchased the "dimpled" nut plates from both Wicks and Skybolt. You can order nut plates with the dimpled rivet holes by simply adding the letter K to the suffix of the nut plate number. Using the current (not Van's outdated K-100 or what ever) designation of MS21047-xx This is a standard 2 lug nutplate. The suffix (xx) denotes the screw size To order this nutplate with dimpled rivet holes, order it as follows MS21047-xxK You say you want the screw hole dimpled as well? Order MS21049-xxK You can find all sorts of nut plate styles in AC43.13-1b in Chapter 7 AIRCRAFT HARDWARE on page 7-65 through 7-67 Check out this entire chapter. It will be an education. That IS part of why we are allowed to build our own aircraft. You can download AC43.13-1b here: http://www.moneypit.net/~pratt/ac43/ Don't leave home without it!! Charlie Kuss RV-8 Dang! After using all those little rivets, these pieces of aluminium actually resemble wings!!! :-) Boca Raton, Fl. Are Barstad wrote: > > > I tried to search for this in the archives, but it seem to be down right > now. > > Does anyone prime the platenuts? They seem to be treated with something > already since they have a dark color to them - almost like bluing on a gun's > barrel. > > Are > RV-8 Wings > C-GQRV (Reserverd) > -- is subject to a download and archival fee in the amount of $500 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Subject: Re: Do we prime Platenuts?
In a message dated 12/7/00 8:09:25 PM Pacific Standard Time, abarstad(at)bconnex.net writes: << Does anyone prime the platenuts?>> Unnecessary. <> They are heat treated and coated with molydisulfide dry film lubricant. -GV (RV-6A N1GV) vanremog(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HCRV6(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Subject: Re: ACK vs. Ameri-King ELT
In a message dated 12/7/00 2:15:47 PM Pacific Standard Time, KBoatri144(at)AOL.COM writes: << Both the extinguisher and ELT will fit between the center two floor rails >> Kyle: Where did you put the ELT antenna? Harry Crosby Pleasanton, California RV-6, working on canopy installation ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ross" <rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: 12V power sources
Date: Dec 07, 2000
Glenn sent me one of these units and I now find I don't need it. It turns out that I had an old AT computer case with a new 200 watt power supply unit. I took it out and now have a great source of filtered 12 volt power. If you would like the unit Glenn sent me, email me off list. Ross N9PT > > I have (5) 12V power sources available to RV builders. > > > > They are 120VAC in, 12V VDC out, Max 4 Amps. They are referred to as > > switching power supplies, and provide a very reliable source (I measured > > one at 11.9VDC). I won't tell you you what you can or can't use them > > for, but I used mine for powering avionics, testing circuts and electric > > gyros during the construction phase of my panel. Whatever you do with > > them, it is at your own risk. They need power cords soldered onto > > them. They sell for about $70.00 each, but I will give them away for > > free under the stipulation that they remain the property of the users of > > this list, and that you mail them to another builder from the list when > > you are finished with them. Please don't ask for one until you are > > really in need of it, other builders need them too. > > > > Please e-mail me directly if you're interested. First come basis. > > > > -Glenn Gordon > > RV-6 (fiberglass fairings & stuff) > > Losing building motivation as my garage gets colder and colder. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Roberto Giusti" <roby(at)mail.com>
Subject: Bird Strike
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Thinking of Laird's encounter, Maybe those of us with sliding canopies could get some extra protection by installing thicker windshields. Airliners have VERY thick and heavy windshields, but they are certified at 300 - 350 Kts I immagine that a small and curved piece of plexiglass such as the RV8 Windshield could be made bird resistantat at 150Kts. I wonder what the weight penalty would be? Does anyone know how to calculate this? Does anyone know of a source for these? Maybe Vans coul find a solution. Roberto Giusti RV8 QB in Italy priming elevators roby(at)mail.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Marcel Bourgon" <mbourgon(at)elp.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Do we prime Platenuts?
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Greetings From El Paso Building 9a. Plate nuts are steel and must be primed. Marcel ----- Original Message ----- From: Are Barstad <abarstad(at)bconnex.net> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 9:06 PM Subject: RV-List: Do we prime Platenuts? > > I tried to search for this in the archives, but it seem to be down right > now. > > Does anyone prime the platenuts? They seem to be treated with something > already since they have a dark color to them - almost like bluing on a gun's > barrel. > > Are > RV-8 Wings > C-GQRV (Reserverd) > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "lucky macy" <luckymacy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: marhyde/veriprime compatiblity
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Question on these self etching primers. On all these self etching primers mentioned, if you just finish the job by putting a single coat of paint on afterwards - even rustoleum grey spray paint - then you should be able to complete the job (probably pretty well) of adequate rust protection? >From: Kevin Horton <khorton(at)cyberus.ca> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV-List: marhyde/veriprime compatiblity >Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 23:33:36 -0500 > > > > > >Hi Folks, > >I'm a "Newbie" here and learning as I go. What is "Marhyde"? Obviously >an > >aerosol primer but who makes it. Where can I buy it? I just tried using > >Tempo zinc chromate and had an absolute mess. > >Dennis Thomas > >RV-9A Emp > > > >Mar-hyde Self-Etching Primer can be bought at many auto body supply >places. It comes in spray bombs, and quart and gallon cans. It is >used by many builders because it is easy to use, and has a nice grey >colour. It is probably not the best choice if you are really worried >about corrosion, but it might be an acceptable choice in many parts >of the country. > >It is made by the Bondo Mar-hyde company. > >-- >Kevin Horton RV-8 (fuselage 95% done) >Ottawa, Canada >http://eccentrix.com/misc/rv8/rv8.html > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gardner, Douglas (GA01)" <douglas.gardner(at)honeywell.com>
Subject: Infinity Grips/Facet fuel pump
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Hey Scott, Sorry I missed the engine handing party. I'm going on business to the east coast today. Plan on coming to the Jupiter RV fly in See you there ?? Doug Gardner -----Original Message----- From: ABAYMAN(at)AOL.COM [mailto:ABAYMAN(at)AOL.COM] Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 8:28 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: Infinity Grips/Facet fuel pump doug do you have a meter to check to see what amps you are acually drawing? it is possible that the fuel pump could be bad drawing too many amps or, the breaker my be weak. either way, check your amp draw that will tell you the answer to both pobable causes. scott tampa rv6a engine hung ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cliff Begnaud" <Shoeless(at)barefootpilot.com>
Subject: Nibbler
Date: Dec 08, 2000
I'm planning for the leading edge wing light in my -9. A hole has to be cut in the wing leading edge and I'm assuming that this is done with a nibbler. I would greatly appreciate hearing from someone who has done this. Exactly which tool should I purchase for this job? Thanks, Cliff RV9A (N782PC -reserved) Empennage, wing arrives near christmas ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Allignment of wings
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Thread-Topic: RV-List: Allignment of wings Thread-Index: AcBgrpeyfhHnIG8tTe2l3n9yMX8/nAAEGNVT
From: "Bob Japundza" <Bob.Japundza(at)realmed.com>
SXQgc3VyZSBsb29rcyBsaWtlIGl0cyBtb3Zpbmcgd2hlbiBpdCBpcyBzdGFuZGluZyBzdGlsbC4u LmhlaA0KaGVoLi4uLlNlcmlvdXNseSB0aG91Z2gsIHRha2UgeW91ciB0aW1lIHdoZW4gcmlnZ2lu ZyB5b3VyIHdpbmdzOyAgdGhleQ0Kd29uJ3QgbW92ZS4gIEkgZmVsdCBpdCBkaWRuJ3QgaHVydCB0 byBtZWFzdXJlIGV2ZXJ5dGhpbmcgMTAgdGltZXMgYW5kDQpkcmlsbCBvbmNlLiAgTXkgd2luZ3Mg YXJlbid0IHBlcmZlY3RseSBhbGlnbmVkLCBidXQgSSBjYW4gc2xlZXAgd2VsbCBhdA0KbmlnaHQu DQogDQpCb2INCmRvIG5vdCBhcmNoaXZlDQoNCi0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tIA0K RnJvbTogR3JlZyBUYW5uZXIgDQpTZW50OiBUaHUgMTIvNy8yMDAwIDU6MTQgUE0gDQpUbzogcnYt bGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tIA0KQ2M6IA0KU3ViamVjdDogUkU6IFJWLUxpc3Q6IEFsbGlnbm1l bnQgb2Ygd2luZ3MNCg0KDQoNCi0tPiBSVi1MaXN0IG1lc3NhZ2UgcG9zdGVkIGJ5OiAiR3JlZyBU YW5uZXIiIDxndGFubmVyQGJlbmRjYWJsZS5jb20+DQoNCldoeSBkbyB5b3Ugc2V0IGl0IHRoZW4g d2FpdCBhbmQgcmVjaGVjay0tZG9lcyBpdCBtb3ZlIG92ZXIgdGltZT8NCg0KR3JlZyBUYW5uZXIN Cg0KLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IG93bmVyLXJ2LWxpc3Qtc2VydmVy QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20NClsgbWFpbHRvOm93bmVyLXJ2LWxpc3Qtc2VydmVyQG1hdHJvbmljcy5j b20NCjxtYWlsdG86b3duZXItcnYtbGlzdC1zZXJ2ZXJAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbT4gXU9uIEJlaGFs ZiBPZiBCb2IgSmFwdW5kemENClNlbnQ6IFRodXJzZGF5LCBEZWNlbWJlciAwNywgMjAwMCA3OjA0 IEFNDQpUbzogcnYtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSRTogUlYtTGlzdDogQWxs aWdubWVudCBvZiB3aW5ncw0KDQoNCi0tPiBSVi1MaXN0IG1lc3NhZ2UgcG9zdGVkIGJ5OiAiQm9i IEphcHVuZHphIiA8Qm9iLkphcHVuZHphQHJlYWxtZWQuY29tPg0KDQpCZXJ0LA0KDQpXaGVuIEkg d2FzIGRvaW5nIG15IGZpbmFsIGFzc2VtYmx5LCBubyBtYXR0ZXIgd2hhdCBJIHRyaWVkLCBJIGNv dWxkIG5vdA0KZ2V0IHRoZSBwbHVtYiBib2JzIHRvIGZhbGwgYW55IGNsb3NlciB0aGFuIDEvMiIu ICBXaGVuIEkgY2FsbGVkIFRvbSBADQpWYW4ncywgaGUgc2FpZCB0aGF0IEkgd2FzIHNwbGl0dGlu ZyBoYWlycyBhbmQgc29tZW9uZSBhdCBWYW4ncyBoYXMgZmxvd24NCmEgY3VzdG9tZXIgYWlycGxh bmUgdGhhdCB3YXMgb2ZmIGJ5IDMiICghISEpIGluIHN3ZWVwIGFuZCB0aGV5IGNvdWxkDQpub3Rp Y2Ugbm8gaWxsIGVmZmVjdHMuICBNeSBhaXJwbGFuZSBmbGllcyBhbmQgc3RhbGxzIHN0cmFpZ2h0 LiAgR2V0DQp0aGluZ3MgYXMgY2xvc2UgYXMgeW91IGNhbiwgYnV0IHRoZSBtYWluIGNvbnNpZGVy YXRpb25zIGFyZSBlZGdlDQpkaXN0YW5jZSBvbiB0aGUgcmVhciBzcGFyIGF0dGFjaCBhbmQgeW91 ciBpbmNpZGVuY2UgYW5nbGUuIA0KDQpUbyBtYWtlIGxpZmUgZWFzaWVyIGZvciB5b3UsIEkgZm9s bG93ZWQgTWFyayBGcmVkZXJpY2sncyBzdWdnZXN0aW9ucw0Kd2hpY2ggd29ya2VkIHdlbGwgYW5k IG1hZGUgdGhlIGpvYiBlYXN5LiAgSSB1c2VkIHRoZSBtYWluIGJ1dHQtam9pbnQNCmFsb25nIHRo ZSBzcGFyIGFzIGEgcmVmZXJlbmNlLCBhbmQgaHVuZyB0aGUgcGx1bWIgYm9icyBieSBpbnNlcnRp bmcgdGhlDQpzdHJpbmcgaW4gdGhlIHNlYW0gYXQgdGhlIHRpcCBhbmQgdGhlIGNvcm5lciBvZiB0 aGUgdGFuayBza2luIGF0IHRoZQ0Kcm9vdC4gIFRoYXQgd2F5LCB5b3VyIHdoZWVscy93aGVlbHBh bnRzIHdvbid0IGludGVyZmVyZSB3aGVuIHNpZ2h0aW5nDQpkb3duIHRoZSBsaW5lLiAgSSBhbHNv IHRvb2sgdHdvIGNoYWlycyBhbmQgcGxhY2VkIHRoZW0gYXQgdGhlIHRpcHMgd2l0aA0KYSBzdHJp bmcgdGllZCB0byBhIGxlZyBvbiBlYWNoIGFib3V0IDEiIG9mZiB0aGUgZ3JvdW5kLiAgSSBtb3Zl ZCB0aGVzZQ0KYXJvdW5kIGNhcmVmdWxseSB0byBtYWtlIHRoZSBzdHJpbmcgdGF1Z2h0IGFuZCBm YWxsIGV4YWN0bHkgdW5kZXIgdGhlDQp0aXAgcGx1bWItYm9icy4gIEkgbWVhc3VyZWQgdGhlIHN3 ZWVwIGF0IHRoZSB0YWlsd2hlZWwgYm9sdCwgYWRqdXN0ZWQNCnRoZSB3aW5ncywgYW5kIHdlbnQg aG9tZS4gIFRoZSBuZXh0IGRheSBJIGNhbWUgYmFjayBvdXQgYW5kIGNoZWNrZWQNCmV2ZXJ5dGhp bmcgdGhlbiBzZXQgdGhlIGluY2lkZW5jZSBhbmQgbGVmdCBhZ2FpbiBmb3IgdGhlIGV2ZW5pbmcu DQpBbm90aGVyIGRheSBwYXNzZWQsIEkgY2hlY2tlZCBldmVyeXRoaW5nIGFnYWluIHRoZW4gZHJp bGxlZCB0aGUgcmVhcg0Kc3Bhci4gIEJlIHBhdGllbnQgYW5kIGJlIHBpY2t5LCBiZWNhdXNlIHlv dSBvbmx5IGdldCBvbmUgc2hvdCBhdCBkb2luZw0KdGhpcyBzZXF1ZW5jZSBjb3JyZWN0bHkuDQoN CkJvYiBKYXB1bmR6YQ0KUlYtNiBOMjQ0QkogTy0zNjBDL1MgZmx5aW5nIDYzIGhvdXJzDQoNCj4g LS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCj4gRnJvbTogYmVydCBtdXJpbGxvIFsgbWFpbHRv OmJlcnRydjZAeWFob28uY29tDQo8bWFpbHRvOmJlcnRydjZAeWFob28uY29tPiBdDQo+IFNlbnQ6 IFdlZG5lc2RheSwgRGVjZW1iZXIgMDYsIDIwMDAgNTozNyBQTQ0KPiBUbzogUnYtTElzdEBtYXRy b25pY3MuY29tDQo+IFN1YmplY3Q6IFJWLUxpc3Q6IEFsbGlnbm1lbnQgb2Ygd2luZ3MNCj4NCj4N Cj4gLS0+IFJWLUxpc3QgbWVzc2FnZSBwb3N0ZWQgYnk6IGJlcnQgbXVyaWxsbyA8YmVydHJ2NkB5 YWhvby5jb20+DQo+DQo+ICAgSGVsbG86DQo+DQo+ICAgICAgRm9yIHRob3NlIHdobyBhbHJlYWR5 IGhhdmUgYWxpZ25lZCB0aGUgd2luZ3MNCj4gIGZpcnN0IHRpbWUuLi5JIGFtIGhhdmluZyB0cm91 YmxlIHdpdGggdGhpcyB0YXNrLi4NCj4gICAgO0Nhbm5vdCBhbGlnbiB0aGVtOyAgS2VlcCBnZXR0 aW5nLCBhYm91dCAxLzIiDQo+ICBvZmYuICBJZiB0aXBzIGFyZSBhbGlnbiwgdGhlIHJvb3QgZW5k IGlzIG5vdCwgYW5kDQo+IHZpY2V2ZXJzYS4NCj4gICAgICAgIEhhdmUgYW55IG9uZSBoYWQgdHJv dWJsZSB3aXRoIHRoaXMsIGFuZCBob3cNCj4gaXQgd2FzIHNvbHZlPw0KPg0KPiAgICAgIEFueSBz dWdnZXN0aW9ucz8gSSBoYXZlIG5vdCBjYWxsZWQgdmFuJ3MgeWV0Lg0KPg0KPiAgICAgDQo+IHRo YW5rcw0KPg0KPiBCZXJ0DQo+DQo+ICAgcnY2YSBRLkINCj4NCj4NCj4gRG8gTk90IGFyY2hpdmUN Cj4NCj4NCj4NCj4NCj4NCj4NCj4NCg0KDQpfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ0KXy09IFRoZSBSVi1MaXN0IGlzIHNwb25z b3JlZCBieSBNYXRyb25pY3MgYW5kIHRocm91Z2gNCl8tPSB0aGUgZ2VuZXJvdXMgQ29udHJpYnV0 aW9ucyBvZiBMaXN0IG1lbWJlcnMuDQpfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ0KXy09IExpc3QgUmVsYXRlZCBXZWIgU2l0ZXMN Cl8tPSAgTWF0cm9uaWNzOiAgICAgaHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tLw0KPGh0dHA6Ly93 d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS8+IA0KXy09ICBMaXN0IFNwZWNpZmljOiBodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJv bmljcy5jb20vcnYtbGlzdA0KPGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9ydi1saXN0PiANCl8t PSAgU3Vic2NyaXB0aW9uOiAgaHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL3N1YnNjcmliZQ0KPGh0 dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9zdWJzY3JpYmU+IA0KXy09ICBTZWFyY2ggRW5naW5lOiBo dHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vc2VhcmNoDQo8aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29t L3NlYXJjaD4gDQpfLT0gIERvd25sb2FkOiAgICAgIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9h cmNoaXZlcw0KPGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9hcmNoaXZlcz4gDQpfLT0gIENvbnRy aWJ1dGlvbnM6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9jb250cmlidXRpb24NCjxodHRwOi8v d3d3Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vY29udHJpYnV0aW9uPiANCl8tPSAgT3RoZXIgTGlzdHM6ICAgaHR0 cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL2VtYWlsbGlzdHMNCjxodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5j b20vZW1haWxsaXN0cz4gDQpfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ0KXy09IFNlY3VyZSBPbmxpbmUgT3JkZXJpbmcgTm93IEF2 YWlsYWJsZSBhdCBNYXRyb25pY3MhDQpfLT0gIFBsYWNlIHlvdXIgb3JkZXIgb25saW5lIGFuZCBz YXZlIDUlIC0NCl8tPSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgaHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL29y ZGVyDQo8aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL29yZGVyPiANCl8tPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09DQoNCg0KDQoNCg0K DQo ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 08, 2000
From: Charlie and Tupper England <cengland(at)netdoor.com>
Subject: clearance recorderon a budget?
http://www.compgeeks.com/details.asp?invtid=PDR2-480D ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "kempthornes" <kempthornes(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Bird Strike
Date: Dec 08, 2000
I suppose to calculate the weight of a thicker windshield (WS) one could use the thickness of the heavier as a factor. That is, if Van's WS is 0.250 inches and it is replaced with one that is 0.750, it would be three times as heavy. Cee Bailey's or other window companies might give a $ estimate. I suggest Bailey as they do them by hand. One thing I haven't seen on this topic is anything to do with BALLISTICS. As I recall the weight of the projectile is multiplied by the **SQUARE** of the velocity. So, hitting the bird at 120 kts vs 60 kts is four times the impact. Somewhere I have Hatcher's Notebook (about guns and projectiles etc) if I need to look it up to be sure but surely there is a ballistics expert on our list? Hal Kempthorne RV6a N7HK Waiting for the fog. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Robert Di Meo" <bdimeo(at)mediaone.net>
Subject: Do we prime Platenuts?
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Are, I prime them with a light coat of cold galvanize paint. It may be way overkill but there is the possibility of dissimilar metal corrosion in a high humidity environment and it only takes a couple of minutes to do the whole bunch. I put them on a sheet of cardboard and spray them on both sides. Bob RV8#423 Fuselage kit arrives today! -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Are Barstad Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 11:07 PM Subject: RV-List: Do we prime Platenuts? I tried to search for this in the archives, but it seem to be down right now. Does anyone prime the platenuts? They seem to be treated with something already since they have a dark color to them - almost like bluing on a gun's barrel. Are RV-8 Wings C-GQRV (Reserverd) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "kempthornes" <kempthornes(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Cutting large holes in aluminum -- was: Nibbler
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Cliff asked how to cut hole in leading edge for landing light. I used a drill and die grinder. Draw a picture of the hole on the skin. Drill with unibit or whatever to get a hole twice the size of the die grinder burr. I have a steel cutter that zips thru aluminum. Go slow! You could use a nibbler but I think they are slow - you could buy a power nibbler! Or one of those new Roto-Zip tools. Don't forget to put a **continuous** 'ring' around the hole. hal ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "kempthornes" <kempthornes(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Auto fuel
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Jim wrote: Maybe you should consider putting some additive in your auto tanks to get the water out of them. Autos take the fuel from the very bottom of the tank, just like airplanes. What little remains is soon scattered thruout the tank unless you drive like an old woman. Use an additive if you have enough water to affect running though. hal ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ENewton57(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Subject: Re: Nibbler
In a message dated 12/8/00 7:41:40 AM Central Standard Time, Shoeless(at)barefootpilot.com writes: << I'm planning for the leading edge wing light in my -9. A hole has to be cut in the wing leading edge and I'm assuming that this is done with a nibbler. I would greatly appreciate hearing from someone who has done this. Exactly which tool should I purchase for this job? Thanks, Cliff >> Hi Cliff, If you go to my web site: http://fly.to/ericsrv I have a section on installing the lights. Look under "Wings" and then click "landing lights". I used a cutoff wheel in a die grinder. It takes lots a courage and a well braced steady hand with lots passes (4 or 5). It really wasn't that hard and it turned out nice. Just finish off the hole with a fine file and some emory cloth. Mine is a 6A but should be about the same as yours for this part. Eric Newton - Long Beach, Mississippi RV-6A N57ME (Reserved) (Fuselage) Eric's RV-6A Construction Page ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David and Betty Burton" <dburton(at)foxinternet.net>
Subject: Re: Cutting large holes in aluminum -- was: Nibbler
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Sam Buchanon has some info on doing this with a Dremmel tool (mini die grinder, light weight and cheap) on his excellent website. Using a nibbler may cause more distortion to the skin then would be acceptable. http//home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal/ Hal, What did you mean about a continuous ring?? A doubler or joggle? Dave RV6a, wings Seattle area ----- Original Message ----- From: kempthornes <kempthornes(at)home.com> Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 6:23 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: Cutting large holes in aluminum -- was: Nibbler > > Cliff asked how to cut hole in leading edge for landing light. > > I used a drill and die grinder. Draw a picture of the hole on the skin. > Drill with unibit or whatever to get a hole twice the size of the die > grinder burr. I have a steel cutter that zips thru aluminum. Go slow! You > could use a nibbler but I think they are slow - you could buy a power > nibbler! Or one of those new Roto-Zip tools. > > Don't forget to put a **continuous** 'ring' around the hole. > > hal > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Shook" <billshook(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Nibbler
Date: Dec 08, 2000
I used a die grinder with a cut off wheel. Simple cut. Very simple actually.....I love that cut off wheel.....I could shave with that thing if I brace my hand on my chin. :-) Bill -4 wings ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cliff Begnaud" <Shoeless(at)barefootpilot.com> Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 8:41 AM Subject: RV-List: Nibbler > > I'm planning for the leading edge wing light in my -9. A hole has to be cut > in the wing leading edge and I'm assuming that this is done with a nibbler. > I would greatly appreciate hearing from someone who has done this. Exactly > which tool should I purchase for this job? > Thanks, > Cliff > RV9A (N782PC -reserved) > Empennage, wing arrives near christmas > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Im7shannon(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Subject: Re: 12V power sources
OK, who is going to field electrical questions now that Bob has dropped off? I used an old cell phone cigarette lighter adapter to power up a used T&B I bought to see if the gyro would run and it worked fine, I was thinking about using the other old cell phone house current adapter to see if it would work in the shop to power up instruments. Anyone tried this or have any thoughts? Kevin Shannon -9A just rolled over canoe electrically challenged ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ENewton57(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Subject: Re: Nibbler
In a message dated 12/8/00 7:41:40 AM Central Standard Time, Shoeless(at)barefootpilot.com writes: << I'm planning for the leading edge wing light in my -9. A hole has to be cut in the wing leading edge and I'm assuming that this is done with a nibbler. I would greatly appreciate hearing from someone who has done this. Exactly which tool should I purchase for this job? Thanks, Cliff >> Hi Cliff, Check out my landing light install section on my web site:
http://fly.to/ericsrv Scroll down to "WingsW then click on "Landing Lights" I used a cutoff wheel and die grinder. Works great! Eric Newton - Long Beach, Mississippi RV-6A N57ME (Reserved) (Fuselage - skinning turtledeck) Eric's RV-6A Construction Page ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Im7shannon(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Subject: Re: Cutting large holes in aluminum -- was: Nibbler
In a message dated 12/8/00 6:22:57 AM Pacific Standard Time, kempthornes(at)home.com writes: > Cliff asked how to cut hole in leading edge for landing light. > FWIW Being an old carpenter I use my old plastic laminate trimmer with bits that have the ball bearing end to ride along the template beneath them. Works great. Planning on using it to do panel cutting Kevin Shannon -9A canoe rolled over ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 08, 2000
From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: Nibbler/landing lights
Cliff Begnaud wrote: > > > I'm planning for the leading edge wing light in my -9. A hole has to be cut > in the wing leading edge and I'm assuming that this is done with a nibbler. > I would greatly appreciate hearing from someone who has done this. Exactly > which tool should I purchase for this job? > Thanks, > Cliff > RV9A (N782PC -reserved) > Empennage, wing arrives near christmas A Dremel tool with cutoff wheel makes a very nice cut and is easy to control if you hold off on the coffee and take your time. Here are photos of the Duckworth installation in my RV-6:
http://home.HiWAAY.net/~sbuc/journal/wing_lg3.html You will use the Dremel many, many more times in the project. Be sure Santa brings you one! Good luck, Sam Buchanan (RV-6, 210 hrs) "The RV Journal" http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 08, 2000
From: Mike Thompson <grobdriver(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Nibbler
--- Cliff Begnaud wrote: > > > I'm planning for the leading edge wing light in my -9. A hole has to > be cut > in the wing leading edge and I'm assuming that this is done with a > nibbler. > I would greatly appreciate hearing from someone who has done this. > Exactly > which tool should I purchase for this job? Standard sheet metal cutters worked for me. Drill corners holes. Drill center hole large enough to start cutting. Hack away! Mike Thompson Austin, TX -6 N140RV (Reserved) Canopy ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 08, 2000
From: barry <bpote(at)erols.com>
Subject: Re: Do we prime Platenuts?
i SURE DO. Plate nuts are bare steel. They ca n rust on their own. But 2ndly they are a'dissimilar' metal from aluminum. Electrolysis can set up. So I prime them. get a plastic fruit juice container. Put acetone or some cleaning fluid in it. DO ALL THE SAME SIZE PLATE NUTS AT ONE TIME. Shake it around. Dump them out and assist the air dry with a hair drier. Lay them out. Paint one side at a time. Good luck. Barry Are Barstad wrote: > > > I tried to search for this in the archives, but it seem to be down right > now. > > Does anyone prime the platenuts? They seem to be treated with something > already since they have a dark color to them - almost like bluing on a gun's > barrel. > > Are > RV-8 Wings > C-GQRV (Reserverd) > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 08, 2000
From: Matt Decker <rmill2000(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: ACK vs. Ameri-King ELT
I purchased the Ameri-King (its just about square in shape) and was disappointed with its antenna. It's simply a long, metal whip the company insists be hung out in the breeze. I have't figured out a way to mount this antenna under the canopy of my -8 so will probably have to spend $70 or so buying a rubber duckie. ACK would be my choice if I had it to do over. Matt RV8 Finishing > > I'm getting ready to order an ELT from Van's. I like the weight > > savings of > > the ACK E-01 compared to the Ameri-King AK-450 (about a pound?) but > > it > > costs $30 more. Are there any other features besides weight and > > price that I > > should consider? > > > > Chris Heitman > > Dousman WI ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 08, 2000
From: barry <bpote(at)erols.com>
Subject: Re: marhyde/veriprime compatiblity
painting platenuts: I sprayed with MAR HYDE and then rustoleum. Later when I sprayed an assembled unit with the same primer, The rustoleum shriveled. For what it's worth. Barry rv9a wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: Re: Nibbler
Date: Dec 08, 2000
> I'm planning for the leading edge wing light in my -9. A hole has to be cut > in the wing leading edge and I'm assuming that this is done with a nibbler. > I would greatly appreciate hearing from someone who has done this. Exactly > which tool should I purchase for this job? > Thanks, > Cliff > RV9A (N782PC -reserved) > Empennage, wing arrives near christmas Cliff, A pneumatic nibbler would work great for this. Just make sure you make your initial cut 1/8" or so away from the real edge. Then you can use files or Scotchbrite wheels to get a clean line. The nibbler cuts quite clean but can be tough to keep a straight line. Staying away from the edge will leave you some room for error. Of course practice cuts in some scrap will tell you how close you can come. Many builders use a combination of cutting wheels on die grinders or Dremel cutting wheels also. I didn't have acces to a nibbler and used the wheel approach with mine... worked fine. Randy Lervold RV-8, #80500, painting etc. www.rv-8.com Home Wing VAF ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Terry Watson" <tcwatson(at)seanet.com>
Subject: Re: Cutting large holes in aluminum -- was: Nibbler
Date: Dec 08, 2000
> > Cliff asked how to cut hole in leading edge for landing light. Or one of those new Roto-Zip tools. I bought another manufacturer's version of the Roto-Zip specifically to cut the landing light openings. Bad move. It was way too course, and it was completely a matter of luck that I didn't destroy the leading edge. I ended up cleaning up the mess and finishing the holes with a cutting disk in my Dremmel tool. Terry RV-8A fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JDaniel343(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Subject: Re: marhyde/veriprime compatiblity
I've used both Veriprime (on empenage and wing ribs) and Marhyde (the rest of the structure). I really like the convience of Marhyde. When I need to prime something I just grab the can, shake and spray and in about 5 to 10 minutes I can be working with that part. The best thing is there is no cleanup. It will seem that Marhyde is very expensive ($12-$13 for a 18oz can) but if you start checking the price of other primer and their activator I think Marhyde is a good buy. Its also quite durable. I usually just go over the piece lightly with Scotch Btite pad and then clean with Naptha. I have a heated hanger I work in so am not sure about applying in the cold. The other primer's on the market I all pretty good. I like Variprime, just didn't like the cleanup. John Danielson Engine installation and finishing kit ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Vincent S. Himsl" <vhimsl(at)turbonet.com>
Subject: Nibbler
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Original.. I'm planning for the leading edge wing light in my -9. A hole has to be cut in the wing leading edge and I'm assuming that this is done with a nibbler. I would greatly appreciate hearing from someone who has done this. Exactly which tool should I purchase for this job? Reply: I marked the leading edge. I drilled some holes @ 1/8 '' from the marks. I used a hand nibbler I bought years ago from Radio Shack to get close. Then I used a combination of files, dremel tool, sandpaper, scotch pad to get to the final opening. I went slow and easy as I was doing it for the first time. I didn't cut right at the marks as didn't want any stress distortion marks around the cut out. Kind of long, drawn out and slow, but sure looks nice when you are done. Vince Himsl RV8 Fuselage Moscow, ID USA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Vincent S. Himsl" <vhimsl(at)turbonet.com>
Subject: Do we prime Platenuts?
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Hello, I soak them in Coleman fuel (fire hazard I know), let dry and then spray. A real pain so If I don't have too, I would really like to know! Regards, Vince Himsl RV8 Fuselage Moscow, ID USA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Persyk" <dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Nibbler
Date: Dec 08, 2000
-----Original Message----- From: Randy Lervold <randy@rv-8.com> Date: Friday, December 08, 2000 11:14 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: Nibbler > >> I'm planning for the leading edge wing light in my -9. A hole has to be >cut >> in the wing leading edge and I'm assuming that this is done with a >nibbler. >> I would greatly appreciate hearing from someone who has done this. Exactly >> which tool should I purchase for this job? >> Thanks, >> Cliff >> RV9A (N782PC -reserved) >> Empennage, wing arrives near christmas > > >Cliff, > >A pneumatic nibbler would work great for this. > >Randy Lervold >RV-8, #80500, painting etc. >www.rv-8.com >Home Wing VAF > Second opinion: The pneumatic nibbler will not work great. I have used my Harbor Freight The pneumatic nibbler for many tasks but the leading edge cut out was not one of them. The foot on the nibbler accepts a 0.065 thick work. The leading edge curvature will cause the work to bind in the foot's slot and you will not be able to nibble on the curvature. Dennis Persyk N600DP 22 hours ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "kempthornes" <kempthornes(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Do we prime Platenuts?
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Vincent wrote: > I soak them in Coleman fuel (fire hazard I know), let dry and then spray. Used to be Coleman fuel had some oil in it. Soapy water or mineral spirits would be better. hal ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "kempthornes" <kempthornes(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: 12V power sources
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Kevin thought of > using the other old cell phone house current adapter to see if it would work > in the shop to power up instruments. Anyone tried this or have any thoughts? A bold experiment! Let us know if it fries any of your instruments! If you need a source of 12 volts for testing etc, go to the airport and get two junk batteries. Charge them up - one will probably be okay. Nice clean 12v with no AC components. Hal Kempthorne RV6a N7HK Signed off! Waiting on the fog. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HCRV6(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Subject: Re: Nibbler
In a message dated 12/8/00 5:41:29 AM Pacific Standard Time, Shoeless(at)barefootpilot.com writes: << Exactly which tool should I purchase for this job? >> My Uni-Bit drill, Dremel cutoff wheel and a file worked great for my when I installed my duckworks lights. Harry Crosby Pleasanton, California RV-6, working on canopy installation ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "kempthornes" <kempthornes(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Cutting large holes in aluminum -- was: Nibbler
Date: Dec 08, 2000
> What did you mean about a continuous ring?? A doubler or joggle? A ring doubler might be the right name. My UAL sheet metal guru says it should be continous - cut from a sheet in one piece. He allowed it might be joined between corners but never at the corner. If joined, there should be a piece over the joint. hal ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "lucky macy" <luckymacy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: don't alodine/BASF epoxy primer/only alodine!
Date: Dec 08, 2000
I have a piece of info and 2 questions. The info is that a BASF field rep just called me back (I called an auto supply paint store and they forwarded my question on to the field rep) and recommended that I use their BASF Diamont line zinc epoxy primer # 589 in an adhesion promoter formula (very thin coat). He said NOT to apply any kind of aluminum preparation stuff such as alumiprep or alodine. He said only to use their 900 pre-cleaner which just removed grease, wax, etc. The epoxy worked better without the other treatments and would be more than adequate to create the barrier we want. Question 1 is has anyone heard of this and if so are you doing it this way? Question 2 is that Alodine is advertised to be a corrosion proofing agent which acts as a "firm barrier against the elements and continued corrosion". The various web resources and the 18 Years of the RVaitor don't say that and don't recommend stopping with just the application of the alodine. What gives? Why not just alodine and call it a day? What's not being said that I'm obviously missing? :-) TIA, lucky ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "kempthornes" <kempthornes(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Engine making metal
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Bill, You said: > The lifters were odd-lot units from > the parts drawer at the overhauler's shop... perhaps a troubling sign in > retrospect. Polishing and cleaning these lifters and assembling them I have no aircraft engine overhaul experience but have done many auto engines, mostly high performance sports cars. I was taught to be very careful to keep lifters in order so that they continue to run on the same cam lobes as otherwise lifters and lobes would wear excessively. Can you remove the lifters for inspection without splitting the case? I think I would be anxious to get that metal out of the engine before it eats up other parts. Screen? Do you have a filter too? hal ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Phillips" <mphill(at)fgi.net>
Subject: Re: Nibbler
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Cliff,I used the nibbler,keeping away from the line about a quarter inch,to keep distortion down. Then I came back with the dremel tool with the cutting disc and went down the line. With the biggest majority of the metal cut away with the nibbler ,it was easy to get the dremel tool to cut 90 degrees with the leading edge. Mine came out perfect. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com> Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 11:10 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: Nibbler > > > I'm planning for the leading edge wing light in my -9. A hole has to be > cut > > in the wing leading edge and I'm assuming that this is done with a > nibbler. > > I would greatly appreciate hearing from someone who has done this. Exactly > > which tool should I purchase for this job? > > Thanks, > > Cliff > > RV9A (N782PC -reserved) > > Empennage, wing arrives near christmas > > > Cliff, > > A pneumatic nibbler would work great for this. Just make sure you make your > initial cut 1/8" or so away from the real edge. Then you can use files or > Scotchbrite wheels to get a clean line. The nibbler cuts quite clean but can > be tough to keep a straight line. Staying away from the edge will leave you > some room for error. Of course practice cuts in some scrap will tell you how > close you can come. > > Many builders use a combination of cutting wheels on die grinders or Dremel > cutting wheels also. I didn't have acces to a nibbler and used the wheel > approach with mine... worked fine. > > Randy Lervold > RV-8, #80500, painting etc. > www.rv-8.com > Home Wing VAF > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Harvey Sigmon" <flyhars(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: UV Smmoth Prime
Date: Dec 08, 2000
OK Paint Guru's, has anybody used any of this UV Smooth Prime that Spruce sells on the fiberglass S cowl, using a Roller instead of spraying to cover pin holes in glass. Thanks in advance Harvey Sigmon RV-6AQB- finish stuff --- Harvey Sigmon --- flyhars(at)earthlink.net --- EarthLink: It's your Internet. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RobHickman(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Subject: Re: RV-4 Paint Job (Designer) BASF
My RV-4 paint job was designed and is being painted by: Corbin May Final Approach (866) 383-3800 (503) 474-1551 Corbin designs paint schemes and if you want will also paint it. Corbin is painting the plane in my shop at work, using BASF Diamont paint. He sanded the whole plane and then used epoxy self etching primer on the bare metal. The plane has not had the clear top coat yet. I will keep updating the web page as he makes progress. http://hometown.aol.com/robhickman/index.html -Rob Hickman N401RH ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ross Mickey" <rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: UV Smmoth Prime
Date: Dec 08, 2000
> OK Paint Guru's, has anybody used any of this UV Smooth Prime that > Spruce sells on the fiberglass S cowl, using a Roller instead of spraying > to cover pin holes in glass. > > Thanks in advance Harvey Sigmon RV-6AQB- finish stuff I have some but haven't used it. A local fiberglass wizard swears by it. Ross ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 08, 2000
From: RICKRV6(at)AOL.COM
Subject: Re: R C Allen
Good luck. My RC Allen has been on back order since early August with no firm date in site. Rick McBride 80027 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "rlluster" <rlluster(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: RV9 fuselage
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Listers I received my fuselage about 2 weeks ago, and have starting it's construction. Two items worth mentioning are: 1) In the bag inventory, bag 1942 calls out K1000-08, which are to be 8-32 platenut. They really were 10-32, 155 of them. Be careful to verify yours, when you get them, as Van's stated, there were approximately 20 bags that went out with the wrong sizes. An 8-32 bolt/screw will go into a 10-32 platenut, but will be real sloppy. 2) Checked my main landing gear per Van's web site, and my gear is correct. Check Van's web site for the update on the RV9 landing gear shipment error. Richard Luster RV9A, 909RL wings and fuselage Marysville, Washington ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stephen J. Soule" <SSoule(at)pfclaw.com>
Subject: UV Smooth Prime
Date: Dec 08, 2000
I used a roller on my S cowl and a similar product from the Wicks catalog. It made a rough mess that is very hard to sand smooth again. There has got to be a better way. Steve Soule Huntington, VT -----Original Message----- OK Paint Guru's, has anybody used any of this UV Smooth Prime that Spruce sells on the fiberglass S cowl, using a Roller instead of spraying to cover pin holes in glass. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Nibbler
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Thread-Topic: RV-List: Nibbler Thread-Index: AcBhVxBIW+HhXN2UTKOaWmJ7rpPUbAABK8mw
From: "Bob Japundza" <Bob.Japundza(at)realmed.com>
I guess I'll jump on the nibbler thread bandwagon... One of the handiest air tools I have is a air-powered belt sander. My dad gave it to me, and I think they're available from Harbor Freight for about $75 for a cheap Taiwanese version. Dynabrade makes them but they are much more expensive, around $300. Used it on just about everything. It has a 3/8" wide belt and is very handy for finishing up edges and rounding corners, knocking off edges, etc. You can get belts that made out of scotchbrite pads for final finishing. When I cut out the landing lights I used a dremel tool with a disc and finished it off with the belt sander. Bob Japundza RV-6 N244BJ O-360C/S flying 62 hours > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Phillips [mailto:mphill(at)fgi.net] > Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 1:29 PM > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: Nibbler > > > > Cliff,I used the nibbler,keeping away from the line about a > quarter inch,to > keep distortion down. Then I came back with the dremel > tool with the > cutting disc and went down the line. With the biggest > majority of the metal > cut away with the nibbler ,it was easy to get the dremel tool > to cut 90 > degrees with the leading edge. Mine came out perfect. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com> > To: > Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 11:10 AM > Subject: Re: RV-List: Nibbler > > > > > > > I'm planning for the leading edge wing light in my -9. A > hole has to be > > cut > > > in the wing leading edge and I'm assuming that this is done with a > > nibbler. > > > I would greatly appreciate hearing from someone who has done this. > Exactly > > > which tool should I purchase for this job? > > > Thanks, > > > Cliff > > > RV9A (N782PC -reserved) > > > Empennage, wing arrives near christmas > > > > > > Cliff, > > > > A pneumatic nibbler would work great for this. Just make > sure you make > your > > initial cut 1/8" or so away from the real edge. Then you > can use files or > > Scotchbrite wheels to get a clean line. The nibbler cuts > quite clean but > can > > be tough to keep a straight line. Staying away from the > edge will leave > you > > some room for error. Of course practice cuts in some scrap > will tell you > how > > close you can come. > > > > Many builders use a combination of cutting wheels on die grinders or > Dremel > > cutting wheels also. I didn't have acces to a nibbler and > used the wheel > > approach with mine... worked fine. > > > > Randy Lervold > > RV-8, #80500, painting etc. > > www.rv-8.com > > Home Wing VAF > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rick Caldwell" <racaldwell(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: don't alodine/BASF epoxy primer/only alodine!
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Lucky, I don't know the BASF product so can't answer that. You know I went the alumiprep/alodine/strontium chromate epoxy primer route. Alodine needs protection such as a primer so it is not scraped off. Alodine creates an oxide layer that is thin, hard & brittle. You will break this layer if not covered quickly with primer. Rick Caldwell -6 Melbourne, FL >From: "lucky macy" <luckymacy(at)hotmail.com> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV-List: don't alodine/BASF epoxy primer/only alodine! >Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 18:25:49 > > >I have a piece of info and 2 questions. > >The info is that a BASF field rep just called me back (I called an auto >supply paint store and they forwarded my question on to the field rep) and >recommended that I use their BASF Diamont line zinc epoxy primer # 589 in >an >adhesion promoter formula (very thin coat). He said NOT to apply any kind >of aluminum preparation stuff such as alumiprep or alodine. He said only >to >use their 900 pre-cleaner which just removed grease, wax, etc. The epoxy >worked better without the other treatments and would be more than adequate >to create the barrier we want. > >Question 1 is has anyone heard of this and if so are you doing it this way? > >Question 2 is that Alodine is advertised to be a corrosion proofing agent >which acts as a "firm barrier against the elements and continued >corrosion". > The various web resources and the 18 Years of the RVaitor don't say that >and don't recommend stopping with just the application of the alodine. >What >gives? Why not just alodine and call it a day? What's not being said that >I'm obviously missing? :-) > >TIA, >lucky > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ross Mickey" <rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Builders Risk Insurance
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Since my engine is arriving soon, I wanted to get builders risk insurance. I checked with a couple of brokers. Again, Van has arranged the best and cheapest through his Vanguard Program. (Call JT Helms at 877-475-5860) The cost is $300 for up to $75,000. They give $15/hour labor and no deductible except for when you are transporting. Then there is a $1,000 deductible. They cover first flight when the policy rolls over to a flying one. The other quote from AIG (or is it AGI?) was for $525 with a blanket $250 deducible and no set amount for labor. Ross Mickey ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Weiler" <doug.weiler(at)pressenter.com>
Subject: Re: R C Allen
Date: Dec 08, 2000
I wouldn't ever plan on getting an RC Allen unit. I gave up on them months and months ago and bought a SigmaTek. I talked with a rep at Century Instrument which is right next door to RC Allen and he had no idea why their production is so messed up. ACS told me they have RC Allen units on back order for well over a year. Doug Weiler MN Wing > > Good luck. My RC Allen has been on back order since early August with no firm date in site. > > Rick McBride > 80027 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Christie" <billc(at)dancris.com>
Subject: Re: 12V power sources
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Ross, In using a multi voltage switching power supply like your "AT" one, you need to be aware that usually the control loop is closed around the 5 volts and that a minimum load is required on the 5 volts to maintain regulation. Without that, the other voltages will be out of regulation also. Some vendors include the minimum load, but the majority don't as it adds to cost and reduces efficiency. I used to design these for NCR back in the '80s. Just check the 5 volt output and see if it is within tolerance. The stuff I designed was within 0.5% at worst. Bill Christie, RV8A, Phoenix ----- Original Message ----- From: Ross <rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 10:57 PM Subject: RV-List: 12V power sources > > Glenn sent me one of these units and I now find I don't need it. It turns > out that I had an old AT computer case with a new 200 watt power supply > unit. I took it out and now have a great source of filtered 12 volt power. > > If you would like the unit Glenn sent me, email me off list. > > Ross > N9PT > > > > > I have (5) 12V power sources available to RV builders. > > > > > > They are 120VAC in, 12V VDC out, Max 4 Amps. They are referred to as > > > switching power supplies, and provide a very reliable source (I measured > > > one at 11.9VDC). I won't tell you you what you can or can't use them > > > for, but I used mine for powering avionics, testing circuts and electric > > > gyros during the construction phase of my panel. Whatever you do with > > > them, it is at your own risk. They need power cords soldered onto > > > them. They sell for about $70.00 each, but I will give them away for > > > free under the stipulation that they remain the property of the users of > > > this list, and that you mail them to another builder from the list when > > > you are finished with them. Please don't ask for one until you are > > > really in need of it, other builders need them too. > > > > > > Please e-mail me directly if you're interested. First come basis. > > > > > > -Glenn Gordon > > > RV-6 (fiberglass fairings & stuff) > > > Losing building motivation as my garage gets colder and colder. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 08, 2000
From: barry <bpote(at)erols.com>
Subject: Re: RV9 fuselage
THanks. Let's stay intouch. Barry rlluster wrote: > > > Listers > > I received my fuselage about 2 weeks ago, and have starting it's > construction. Two items worth mentioning are: > > 1) In the bag inventory, bag 1942 calls out K1000-08, which are to be > 8-32 platenut. They really were 10-32, 155 of them. Be careful to verify > yours, when you get them, as Van's stated, there were approximately 20 bags > that went out with the wrong sizes. An 8-32 bolt/screw will go into a 10-32 > platenut, but will be real sloppy. > > 2) Checked my main landing gear per Van's web site, and my gear is correct. > Check Van's web site for the update on the RV9 landing gear shipment error. > > Richard Luster > RV9A, 909RL > wings and fuselage > Marysville, Washington > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: KBoatri144(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Subject: Re: ACK vs. Ameri-King ELT
In a message dated 12/8/00 1:04:25 AM Eastern Standard Time, HCRV6(at)AOL.COM writes: > << Both the extinguisher and ELT will fit between the center two floor > rails > >> > > > Kyle: Where did you put the ELT antenna? > > Harry Crosby > Pleasanton, California > RV-6, working on canopy installation > I ran the cable through the main spar and back to the tail cone mounted antenna ala Sam Buchanan and others. You could give yourself a shorter cable run and just put it in the baggage compartment. Kyle Boatright - Kennesaw, GA RV-6 Slider, O-320/Aymar-Demuth ________________________________________________________________________________
From: KBoatri144(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Subject: Re: UV Smooth Prime
In a message dated 12/8/00 4:17:43 PM Eastern Standard Time, SSoule(at)pfclaw.com writes: > I used a roller on my S cowl and a similar product from the Wicks catalog. > It made a rough mess that is very hard to sand smooth again. There has got > to be a better way. > > Steve Soule > Huntington, VT > Thin it more than recommended and it gives you a smoother mess. I found that it sands fairly easily if you don't get big lumps caused by, you guessed it, not thinning enough. Kyle Boatright - Kennesaw, GA RV-6 Slider, O-320/Aymar-Demuth ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom & Cathy Ervin" <tcervin(at)valkyrie.net>
Subject: Verticle Stabilizer RV6-A-QB
Date: Dec 08, 2000
List: Just installed my horizontal stabilizer with no problem. Moving on to the vertical stabilizer I noticed both the fuselage skin and 3\4 in. angle extend 3 inches beyond where the vertical stab. is to bolt? It would appear the angle and skin need trimmed but how much? Any builders have this problem? Does someone have a good picture on their Website? Tom Cold in Ohio ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bowen" <Larry(at)bowenaero.com>
Subject: R C Allen
Date: Dec 08, 2000
But if you want an electric AI, what other choice is there? Larry Bowen Email: Larry(at)BowenAero.com Web: http://BowenAero.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Doug Weiler > Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 4:59 PM > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: R C Allen > > > > I wouldn't ever plan on getting an RC Allen unit. I gave up on > them months > and months ago and bought a SigmaTek. I talked with a rep at Century > Instrument which is right next door to RC Allen and he had no > idea why their > production is so messed up. ACS told me they have RC Allen units on back > order for well over a year. > > Doug Weiler > MN Wing > > > > > > Good luck. My RC Allen has been on back order since early > August with no > firm date in site. > > > > Rick McBride > > 80027 > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 08, 2000
From: Bill Ervin <bjervin(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Nibbler
Cliff Why not go the wing tip route? Then you don't have to cut those holes!! Bill Cliff Begnaud wrote: > > > I'm planning for the leading edge wing light in my -9. A hole has to be cut > in the wing leading edge and I'm assuming that this is done with a nibbler. > I would greatly appreciate hearing from someone who has done this. Exactly > which tool should I purchase for this job? > Thanks, > Cliff > RV9A (N782PC -reserved) > Empennage, wing arrives near christmas > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 08, 2000
From: Ted Cross <n0iak(at)qsl.net>
Subject: Re: 12V power sources
Kevin, That's a pretty risky proposition. Not all power adapters are created equal. The typical "wall wart" power bricks used for many applications all have different specs. They come in different voltages, some are constant current making the voltage out variable depending on the load, etc. etc. Also, most power adapters, even if they're the right voltage usually only sink (read supply) a few tens or hundreds of milliamps, not enough to power instruments and avionics. BTW, hi to everyone on the list, I just signed up a few days ago and have enjoyed reading the traffic. Also signed up for the RV9 list. Order will be going out for the -9 emp. kit next week. Ted Im7shannon(at)AOL.COM wrote: > > OK, who is going to field electrical questions now that Bob has dropped off? > I used an old cell phone cigarette lighter adapter to power up a used T&B I > bought to see if the gyro would run and it worked fine, I was thinking about > using the other old cell phone house current adapter to see if it would work > in the shop to power up instruments. Anyone tried this or have any thoughts? > Kevin Shannon > -9A just rolled over canoe > electrically challenged -- Ted Cross (N0IAK & G0HHY) n0iak(at)qsl.net ICQ: 16040894 RV9A - Planning Stage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Donald R. Eaves" <doneaves(at)bigfoot.com>
Subject: ACK vs. Ameri-King ELT
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Well I'm glad to have the opportunity to give Ameri-King Some Bad Press Because I promised their General manager & Customer Service Rep., I would badmouth them because of their poor attitude toward Homebuilders who buy there units, not knowing when they might get to use them. Only to find out they are out of warranty when they discover they have a LEMMON. AK's Customer Service General Manager name is Victor, The AK 350 Encoder I bought 2+- years ago lasted long enough to make it through the $200 Pitot Static Altimeter / Encoder Certification, then was discovered to of failed somewhere between that and the 3rd hour of my RV6 test flight program. The hard to understand individual is a General Manager for Ameri-King, His Name is name is Victor. After a lot of haggling, Victor ask me to sent my unit in so they could determine what was wrong - If anything? I FedEx'ed it to them after noon CA time, the next day to see what they had found. Victor immediately told me the repair would cost me $138.??. I then I again tried to get some relief because I was less than satisfied with the reliability of the Encoder. After a long argument he told me he would exchanger my unit for $119. I ask if that included an FAA certification of the unit and he assured me it was. I gave him my credit card information and My FedEx account number to ship the new unit back Next Day. I got the unit the next day about 1pm via UPS! - Enclosed was an invoice for $119 + $33 shipping and handling! The invoice indicated a Ruth filled my order and shipped it. Did I pay for it with my credit card? Do I owe them $150+-?? Only time or a phone call will tell. Did they try to ship it FedEx? ??? Did they try to give UPS my FedEx Account number then decide to ship and bill me for the shipping because then number was invalid? maybe Ruth or Victor knows. The unit has shaky documentation for certification. Does anyone know if they have email or a web site? I have been unable to locate one. Unhappy Ameri-King Customer Don Eaves Cordova TN RV6 - 7.2 Hours Test Flight Time... -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Bill Ervin Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 10:36 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: ACK vs. Ameri-King ELT Don't know about their ELTs, but I had nothing but problems with Amri-King's Encoder, I sent it back 4 times and continued to get the same problem and the same excuse (it must be something you or your tech are doing). And the person I talked to couldn't even speak good english. I'm not impressed. Bill RV-6 Fuse Doug Weiler wrote: > > > > > > I'm getting ready to order an ELT from Van's. I like the weight savings of > > the ACK E-01 compared to the Ameri-King AK-450 (about a pound?) but it > > costs $30 more. Are there any other features besides weight and price that > I > > should consider? > > I purchased the ACK for both my Citabria and RV. I had heard comments about > poor customer service from Ameri-King. I don't know how true those comments > were, but I am happy with the quality and simplicity of the ACK unit. > > Doug Weiler > Mn Wing > > ================ > Doug Weiler > Hudson, WI > 715-386-1239 > dougweil(at)pressenter.com > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BSEckstein(at)cs.com
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Subject: Re: Filling Mis-Drilled Holes
One way to repair a hole is to countersink both sides of the hole until the coutersinks meet in the middle of the skin, cut a rivet shank a bit longer than the skin thickness (throw out the rivet head) and squeeze it flush on both sides. Then, either cover it with some extra coats of primer or a bit of filler and it disappears. I've done this a few times and am pleased with the results and ease of the operation. Brian Eckstein 6A painting ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 08, 2000
From: Bill Ervin <bjervin(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: ACK vs. Ameri-King ELT
I'll add to my original post: When I sent my first unit back to them (It was still under warranty) Our buddy Victor Shipped me back a unit that had obviously been used before, There were scratches and wear marks all over it and no Green,yellow,or red tag. I sent it back to him after I talked to a FSDO friend of mine. With a CC. of a letter to the Los Angeles FAA Avionics Manufacture Rep. It got Victors attention!! He sent me a brand new shiny unit which worked about 10 hours and failed. I still have it, chalked it up to experience!! Sometimes you do get what you pay for, and MORE!!! Bill RV-6 Spokane WA "Donald R. Eaves" wrote: > > > Well I'm glad to have the opportunity to give Ameri-King Some Bad Press > Because I promised their General manager & Customer Service Rep., I would > badmouth them because of their poor attitude toward Homebuilders who buy > there units, not knowing when they might get to use them. Only to find out > they are out of warranty when they discover they have a LEMMON. AK's > Customer Service General Manager name is Victor, > > The AK 350 Encoder I bought 2+- years ago lasted long enough to make it > through the $200 Pitot Static Altimeter / Encoder Certification, then was > discovered to of failed somewhere between that and the 3rd hour of my RV6 > test flight program. > > The hard to understand individual is a General Manager for Ameri-King, His > Name is name is Victor. > > After a lot of haggling, Victor ask me to sent my unit in so they could > determine what was wrong - If anything? > I FedEx'ed it to them after noon CA time, the next day to see what they had > found. Victor immediately told me the repair would cost me $138.??. I then > I again tried to get some relief because I was less than satisfied with the > reliability of the Encoder. After a long argument he told me he would > exchanger my unit for $119. I ask if that included an FAA certification of > the unit and he assured me it was. > > I gave him my credit card information and My FedEx account number to ship > the new unit back Next Day. > > I got the unit the next day about 1pm via UPS! - Enclosed was an invoice for > $119 + $33 shipping and handling! > The invoice indicated a Ruth filled my order and shipped it. > > Did I pay for it with my credit card? Do I owe them $150+-?? Only time or a > phone call will tell. Did they try to ship it FedEx? ??? Did they try to > give UPS my FedEx Account number then decide to ship and bill me for the > shipping because then number was invalid? maybe Ruth or Victor knows. > > The unit has shaky documentation for certification. > > Does anyone know if they have email or a web site? > I have been unable to locate one. > > Unhappy Ameri-King Customer > Don Eaves > Cordova TN > RV6 - 7.2 Hours Test Flight Time... > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Bill Ervin > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 10:36 PM > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: ACK vs. Ameri-King ELT > > > Don't know about their ELTs, but I had nothing but problems with > Amri-King's Encoder, I sent it back 4 times and continued to get the > same problem and the same excuse (it must be something you or your tech > are doing). And the person I talked to couldn't even speak good english. > I'm not impressed. > > Bill > RV-6 Fuse > > Doug Weiler wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I'm getting ready to order an ELT from Van's. I like the weight savings > of > > > the ACK E-01 compared to the Ameri-King AK-450 (about a pound?) but it > > > costs $30 more. Are there any other features besides weight and price > that > > I > > > should consider? > > > > I purchased the ACK for both my Citabria and RV. I had heard comments > about > > poor customer service from Ameri-King. I don't know how true those > comments > > were, but I am happy with the quality and simplicity of the ACK unit. > > > > Doug Weiler > > Mn Wing > > > > ================ > > Doug Weiler > > Hudson, WI > > 715-386-1239 > > dougweil(at)pressenter.com > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bowen" <Larry(at)bowenaero.com>
Subject: Builders Risk Insurance
Date: Dec 08, 2000
I'm using VanGuard for builder's risk too ... as well as rental coverage. I've been happy with JT's service so far. Larry Bowen RV-8 gear boxes Email: Larry(at)BowenAero.com Web: http://BowenAero.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Ross Mickey > Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 4:47 PM > To: RV-List > Subject: RV-List: Builders Risk Insurance > > > Since my engine is arriving soon, I wanted to get builders risk insurance. > I checked with a couple of brokers. Again, Van has arranged the best and > cheapest through his Vanguard Program. (Call JT Helms at > 877-475-5860) The > cost is $300 for up to $75,000. They give $15/hour labor and no > deductible > except for when you are transporting. Then there is a $1,000 deductible. > They cover first flight when the policy rolls over to a flying one. The > other quote from AIG (or is it AGI?) was for $525 with a blanket $250 > deducible and no set amount for labor. > > Ross Mickey > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 08, 2000
From: Stuart B McCurdy <sturdy(at)att.net>
Subject: Canopy Bow, Side Rail Alignment
Listers, I am building an RV-8 QB. I am about to attach the canopy bow weldment to the side rail. However, the angle of the weldment is greater than the matching portion of the rail where it is flat on the inside and has the upward angle towards the outside. The weldment lays flat on the inside where the two bolts go in from the side, but there is a gap on the outside where the five bolts attach downward. Anyone had the same problem and what did you do to make the weldment lay flat? Stu McCurdy RV-3, 74TX RV-8 QB, Fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________ User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Subject: Re: ACK vs. Ameri-King ELT
From: "Denis (Bum) Walsh" <deniswalsh(at)earthlink.net>
on 12/8/00 9:27, Matt Decker at rmill2000(at)yahoo.com wrote: > > I purchased the Ameri-King (its just about square in shape) and was > disappointed with its antenna. It's simply a long, metal whip > the company insists be hung out in the breeze. I have't figured out > a way to mount this antenna under the canopy of my -8 so will > probably have to spend $70 or so buying a rubber duckie. ACK would > be my choice if I had it to do over. > > Matt RV8 Finishing > > >>> I'm getting ready to order an ELT from Van's. I like the weight >>> savings of >>> the ACK E-01 compared to the Ameri-King AK-450 (about a pound?) but >>> it >>> costs $30 more. Are there any other features besides weight and >>> price that I >>> should consider? >>> >>> Chris Heitman >>> Dousman WI > Ditto on the ACK. The thing I like is the antenna, which has a coil in the midst of it and allows mounting in the bag compartment ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "edperry64" <edperry64(at)netzero.net>
Subject: Heated pitot tube
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Hi, I know very little about electrical so here is the question....I have Bob's Book..... I just bought a new surplus Heated pitot tube, AN5812-1 "L" shaped. The catch is that it is 24 volts. I hooked it up to my 12 volt 15amp power supply to see what would happen. The results were 225 degrees were produced at the tip and it showed 3 amps of current. I left it on for about 10 minutes and it didn't blow the 5 amp CB I put in line. So the question is, Am I looking for trouble running this in a 12 volt system or will it only put out a lower amount of heat. It seems like the 225 degrees would be adequate for deicing. Thank You, Ed Perry RV8QB 180/CS Heated Pitot? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JNice51355(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Subject: Re: Bird strikes
In a message dated 12/07/2000 8:54:08 AM Pacific Standard Time, Johnny(at)wiktel.com writes: << Wonder if those little ultrasonic whistles you put on the front bumper of the car to scare deer will work on birds?? >> Geez, I hope they work differently on an airplane. I've known folks that never hit a deer but located one after installation of the sonic device. do not archive ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Storo" <ERSF2b(at)oregoncoast.com>
Subject: VM-1000 terminals
Date: Dec 08, 2000
I have found some of the info needed for the plug-in terminals on the gold box. 1. Mouser electronics 800 346 6873 is the source. 2. My part numer was 506-2MR-04 3. They make these plugs in several styles, and sizes, i.e. 3 or 4 or 8 'tangs'. 4. I can not find the catalog, or invoice. But the price for the whole box was somewhere around $10-20. (my excuse is that we are still unpacking.) When I find the invoice I will post the numbers. Ed Storo RV8 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: SportAV8R(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Subject: ACK vs Ameri-King ELT
>I purchased the Ameri-King (its just about square in shape) and was > disappointed with its antenna. It's simply a long, metal whip > the company insists be hung out in the breeze. I have't figured out > a way to mount this antenna under the canopy of my -8 so will > probably have to spend $70 or so buying a rubber duckie. ACK would > be my choice if I had it to do over. >Ditto on the ACK. The thing I like is the antenna, which has a coil in the >midst of it and allows mounting in the bag compartment Gentlemen, allow me to weigh in here. I have owned both ELT's on two different planes and can speak from experience. The ACK antenna, with its center loading co8il, will last almost no time at all in the elements brefore its pretty chrome coating begins to flake off at the stress points and the resulting rust is UGLY. If you mount the antenna under the canopy you might come out okay. The AK antenna, a stainless tapered whip, is actually the best thing about the ELT, the worst thing being that if you ever activate an AK-450 from the panel, as I did, and find you cannot turn it off again, you will be dealing with Victor, twice, before getting satisfaction. This may make you afraid to risk testing the unit ever again, even though you are supposed to. I decided to leave mine alone and not chance it. IMO, the best outside installation would be AK's whip antenna and ACK's reliable ELT. I plan to move my antenna "indoors" if tests show the drag is significant. This has been hashed out on the list recently and I am unconvinced that the numbers are as dire as the drag equations suggest. My AK whip is presently on the turtledeck aft of the canopy. By some calculations, this is costing me 5 hp and untold speed. I can almost guarantee you that the substitution of a rubber duck antenna will violate the TSO for either unit. In that case, you might as well leave the ELT out altogether and save weight. Well, given the performance of ELT's in actual crashes, it's almost that bad... Bill Boyd RV-6A O-320/FP Sensenich Hop-Along Airfield - 12VA Clifton Forge, VA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: SportAV8R(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Subject: Re: Heated pitot tube
In a message dated 12/08/2000 9:52:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, edperry64(at)netzero.net writes: > I just bought a new surplus Heated pitot tube, AN5812-1 "L" shaped. The > catch is that it is 24 volts. I hooked it up to my 12 volt 15amp power > supply to see what would happen. The results were 225 degrees were produced > at the tip and it showed 3 amps of current. I left it on for about 10 > minutes and it didn't blow the 5 amp CB I put in line. > So the question is, Am I looking for trouble running this in a 12 volt > system or will it only put out a lower amount of heat. It seems like the 225 > degrees would be adequate for deicing. Ed: seems to me the pitot is designed for 24v and could not be hurt in any way by 12 v power. Given the power relationship P=E 2/R, the pitot heating element would be expected to generate four times the BTU's, watts, what have you, at 24 volts as at 12 v., but this would in no way suggest what the temperature might work out to be at 24v. We just know it will be higher. Much depends on the delta T between the pitot and ambient, and the nonlinear resistance of the heating element as it heats up, etc. 225 degrees seems adequate for de-icing, but what will the temp be at an OAT of many degrees below zero at airspeeds of 200 mph??? Quite a lot of heat loss from the pitot under those conditions, and a whole new resulting temperature. No doubt the pitot heat has margin built in, but is it 400% over-powered for the job? I wonder. Are you willing to build a refrigerated wind tunnel to find out? How about instrumenting the pitot with a temp sensor and going flying this winter... Bill Boyd RV-6A O-320/FP Sensenich Hop-Along Airfield - 12VA Clifton Forge, VA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Terry Burch" <rv6man(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Do we prime Platenuts?
Date: Dec 08, 2000
----- Original Message ----- From: "barry" <bpote(at)erols.com> Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 11:08 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: Do we prime Platenuts? > > i SURE DO. Plate nuts are bare steel. They ca n rust on their own. > Wrong!Plate nuts are not bare steel! They are coated and dont need painting. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jim jewell" <jjewell(at)okanagan.net>
Subject: Re: Engine making metal+camshaft care and feeding
Date: Dec 08, 2000
I concur with Hal, In years past I had occasion to spend many hours in a cam grinding shop "Shadbolt Cams in Vancouver BC.' During that time I was taught that the matching wear patterns on cam lobes and cam lifters must be maintained at all cost when reinstalling used parts sets. My experience since those days has shown that to be true. The preferred choice when putting a new or reground cam under used lifters was and still is, to have the lifters re-surfaced. This of course assumes that the used lifters will remain in tolerance after being re-finished. At Shadbolt the re-finishing was done on a in house custom built lifter surface grinder. It was considered the best reliable way to assure that the mating surfaces would wear into each other and provide predictable long service. All customers were advised NOT to put old lifters on new or re-ground cams. they were also advised to bring the lifters to be re-ground into the shop marked, carded or boxed so that they could be re-fitted into block in the holes they came out of. New lifters on old cams was also not advised. When these new or freshly ground surfaces are first run, the square inch loading at the molecular interface is very high. this is the reason that liberal application of molly type greases at installation are advised. Once the first few thousand revolutions are past the loading begins going down quickly. If the RPM can be kept above idle at this stage the break in will have a much better chance of succeeding. In almost all push rod engines with the cam build into the crankcase area the camshafts are positioned above the crankshaft. Most of these designs do not provide force fed oil to each individual cam lobe. Most of our Lycoming engines are in this group These engines rely on oil being flung off of the various pressurized rotating and reciprocating parts for camshaft lubrication. The closer to the crank the cam lives the better the low RPM oiling. These cam application's would love never to run under 1500 RPM. They like oil splashing all over them at all times. Long term low idle should be avoided if possible. Go to to get contact info. Ask for Barry if you have need of more concise information. This information is the truth as I know it, I will accept and consider any and all suggestions and corrections offered with a kind heart. all others will be returned to sender. {|:-)! Jim in kelowna considering and designing rudder trim ideas. ----- Original Message ----- From: kempthornes <kempthornes(at)home.com> Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 10:33 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: Re: Engine making metal > > Bill, > > You said: > The lifters were odd-lot units from > > the parts drawer at the overhauler's shop... perhaps a troubling sign in > > retrospect. Polishing and cleaning these lifters and assembling them > > I have no aircraft engine overhaul experience but have done many auto > engines, mostly high performance sports cars. I was taught to be very > careful to keep lifters in order so that they continue to run on the same > cam lobes as otherwise lifters and lobes would wear excessively. > > Can you remove the lifters for inspection without splitting the case? > > I think I would be anxious to get that metal out of the engine before it > eats up other parts. > > Screen? Do you have a filter too? > > hal > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jim jewell" <jjewell(at)okanagan.net>
Subject: Re: Heated pitot tube
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Hi Ed, No problem with under power But keep in mind that cold air passing over the pitot at cruise speed will push most of the 225 degrees back off the tip of your pitot. a 12 volt heater might be swapped for what you have. Better some heat but, I think hotter would be better. Jim in Kelowna ----- Original Message ----- From: edperry64 <edperry64(at)netzero.net> Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 6:50 PM Subject: RV-List: Heated pitot tube > > Hi, > > I know very little about electrical so here is the question....I have Bob's > Book..... > > I just bought a new surplus Heated pitot tube, AN5812-1 "L" shaped. The > catch is that it is 24 volts. I hooked it up to my 12 volt 15amp power > supply to see what would happen. The results were 225 degrees were produced > at the tip and it showed 3 amps of current. I left it on for about 10 > minutes and it didn't blow the 5 amp CB I put in line. > So the question is, Am I looking for trouble running this in a 12 volt > system or will it only put out a lower amount of heat. It seems like the 225 > degrees would be adequate for deicing. > > Thank You, > Ed Perry > RV8QB 180/CS Heated Pitot? > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Scott Pittman" <SPITTMAN(at)mediaone.net>
Subject: Re: Do we prime Platenuts?
Date: Dec 09, 2000
Intresting thread. I agree that the black plate nuts are coated. I have had a box of them in the garage for 10 years and they look like new...unlike some of my steel tools (bucking bars, rivet sets, ect.) that rust so easily here in South Florida. It is so easy to prime them though, so why not? But, on the other hand, there are lots of other steel on aluminum parts that are not...bolts, washers, and pop rivets come to mind. Few people consider priming these parts over the coating. It is easy to get carried away with this priming thing. Scott Pittman RV-4 Wings > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "barry" <bpote(at)erols.com> > To: > Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 11:08 AM > Subject: Re: RV-List: Do we prime Platenuts? > > > > > > i SURE DO. Plate nuts are bare steel. They ca n rust on their own. > > > > Wrong!Plate nuts are not bare steel! They are coated and dont need painting. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rvmils(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 09, 2000
Subject: right wing heavy, which trailing edge to squeez
My right wing is about 2 lbs heavy in and I wondering which trailing edge to squeez. Thanks, Carey Mills ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <pbesing(at)rmi.net>
Subject: Re: Verticle Stabilizer RV6-A-QB
Date: Dec 08, 2000
Yep..you have to trim it...it's alot of cutting! They build it long, so that you can fit yours to your liking. If memory serves me correctly, the skin does extend aft of the bulkhead, which you trim to match your rudder. Paul Besing RV-6A (197AB) Arizona http://www.lacodeworks.com/besing/ Finish Kit ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom & Cathy Ervin" <tcervin(at)valkyrie.net> Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 5:16 PM Subject: RV-List: Verticle Stabilizer RV6-A-QB > > List: Just installed my horizontal stabilizer with no problem. Moving on to > the vertical stabilizer I noticed both the fuselage skin and 3\4 in. angle > extend 3 inches beyond where the vertical stab. is to bolt? > It would appear the angle and skin need trimmed but how much? Any > builders have this problem? Does someone have a good picture on their > Website? Tom Cold in Ohio > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <pbesing(at)rmi.net>
Subject: Re: ACK vs Ameri-King ELT
Date: Dec 08, 2000
I have the ACk, and I did some shock tests to see how they activated, used the panel switch, etc, etc. It always reset just fine, and appears to work well. I even activated it and had a friend tune his transiever to 121.5. He lives about 2 miles away, behind some hills. He was inside his living room, and picked it up great. I have the SS whip inside the cabin, under the rear window. I know we were talking about -8's , but just for reference, the installation is here: http://www.lacodeworks.com/besing/avionics.htm Paul Besing RV-6A (197AB) Arizona http://www.lacodeworks.com/besing/ Finish Kit ----- Original Message ----- From: <SportAV8R(at)AOL.COM> Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 8:46 PM Subject: RV-List: ACK vs Ameri-King ELT > > >I purchased the Ameri-King (its just about square in shape) and was > > disappointed with its antenna. It's simply a long, metal whip > > the company insists be hung out in the breeze. I have't figured out > > a way to mount this antenna under the canopy of my -8 so will > > probably have to spend $70 or so buying a rubber duckie. ACK would > > be my choice if I had it to do over. > > >Ditto on the ACK. The thing I like is the antenna, which has a coil in the > >midst of it and allows mounting in the bag compartment > > Gentlemen, allow me to weigh in here. I have owned both ELT's on two > different planes and can speak from experience. The ACK antenna, with its > center loading co8il, will last almost no time at all in the elements brefore > its pretty chrome coating begins to flake off at the stress points and the > resulting rust is UGLY. If you mount the antenna under the canopy you might > come out okay. > > The AK antenna, a stainless tapered whip, is actually the best thing about > the ELT, the worst thing being that if you ever activate an AK-450 from the > panel, as I did, and find you cannot turn it off again, you will be dealing > with Victor, twice, before getting satisfaction. This may make you afraid to > risk testing the unit ever again, even though you are supposed to. I decided > to leave mine alone and not chance it. > > IMO, the best outside installation would be AK's whip antenna and ACK's > reliable ELT. I plan to move my antenna "indoors" if tests show the drag is > significant. This has been hashed out on the list recently and I am > unconvinced that the numbers are as dire as the drag equations suggest. My > AK whip is presently on the turtledeck aft of the canopy. By some > calculations, this is costing me 5 hp and untold speed. > > I can almost guarantee you that the substitution of a rubber duck antenna > will violate the TSO for either unit. In that case, you might as well leave > the ELT out altogether and save weight. Well, given the performance of ELT's > in actual crashes, it's almost that bad... > > Bill Boyd > RV-6A O-320/FP Sensenich > Hop-Along Airfield - 12VA > Clifton Forge, VA > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Hurlbut" <shurlbut(at)island.net>
Subject: Re: Items For Sale (Canada)
Date: Dec 08, 2000
I'm interested in Rv-6A kit as well as RV-6A. Please let me know. Steve Hurlbut Comox, BC shurlbut(at)island.net ----- Original Message ----- From: Tedd McHenry <tedd(at)vansairforce.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 4:12 PM Subject: RV-List: Items For Sale (Canada) > > We have the following items listed for sale on our web site. All items > are currently in Canada. > > RV-6 > RV4 project > RV6A Kit > RV-6A > Telex & SigTronics Headsets > New RV-4 (lost medical forces sale) > > You can view the listings at > > http://www.vansairforce.org/classifieds/ > > Tedd McHenry > Van's Air Force > Western Canada Wing > tedd(at)vansairforce.org > http://www.vansairforce.org > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 09, 2000
Subject: Re: right wing heavy, which trailing edge to squeeze
In a message dated 12/8/00 9:58:07 PM Pacific Standard Time, Rvmils(at)AOL.COM writes: << My right wing is about 2 lbs heavy in and I wondering which trailing edge to squeeze >> Make sure the plane has been evenly loaded fuel wise and occupant wise. Make sure that the heavy wing is not squeezed too sharp to start with. Go fly and neutralize all trimming forces (be sure you have disconnected any springs in the system). Remembering the phrase "light squeeze", squeeze the light wing aileron trailing edge lightly all along its span and go fly again. Keep squeezing the light wing lightly until you are flying level. If the heavy side needs unsqueezing, a blocking of the trailing edge is warranted. -GV (RV-6A N1GV) vanremog(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Greg Richardson" <kpd_307(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Lycoming and Auto gas date.)
Date: Dec 09, 2000
Fellow Listers: In regards to the other posts on this subject I thought I would weigh in. I pump about 1000 gals of 100LL each summer weekend, and felt that some quality control issues were being overlooked with auto gas. Consider that your average gas station could care less about water, however to maintain a dealership we not only have to drain all sumps of water daily, but also maintain a log of such. The average gas station has no such sumps on their tanks. Just ask them to pay for your fuel dry when your gas line freezes this winter to find out how much they care about water in their fuel. In this light it sounds as if the water separating funnel is a novel idea. The other problem with auto gas is foreign matter in the tank. Auto fuel is not filtered from the semi, and probably only marginally at the pump. Avgas is filtered as it comes off of the semi and goes into the tank, and again when pumped into the truck, and a third time as it is placed in the wing. Our filters are also changed every six months whether they need it or not. Again we must chart quality control on the amount of sediment that is present at the sumping of all tanks. YOU become that quality control agent when using auto gas. A close knit cloth would probably catch most if not all of the sediment that I have seen, however there again our tanks are sumped daily. Just look at the bottom of your gas can to see the problem. It only takes one bit of gunk to clog a carburetor jet. I am not trying to sell avgas by any means, but am genuinely interested in your engine maintaining an adequate supply of fuel to run on. Scrutinize what you pour into your tanks....your life may depend on it. Just my .02 worth. Greg RV-9A emp ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jim Sears <sears(at)searnet.com>
Subject: Re: Lycoming and Auto gas date.)
Date: - - - , 20-
Listers, I just read Greg Richardson's report on auto gas vs avgas quality controls. It was a good report; but, it also came from someone who works, or has worked, at a FBO that derives part of its income from the sell of avgas. That makes it a bit more biased and adds to those wives tales we read so much about. I'm not trying to put down his report in any way because I know he believes in what he's saying; but, I think a few words from the other side are in order to balance things out a bit. Well, maybe it'll be more than a few words because I get into this stuff. :-) >Consider that your average gas station could care less about water, >however to maintain a dealership we not only have to drain all >sumps of water daily, but also maintain a log of such. The average >gas station has no such sumps on their tanks. Just ask them to pay >for your fuel dry when your gas line freezes this winter to find out >how much they care about water in their fuel. In this light it sounds >as if the water separating funnel is a novel idea. If water in the gas is a problem at a gas station, I can assure you that it gets fixed quickly if that place wants to stay in business. I firmly believe that we get more water in our auto and airplane tanks from condensation than we do from the pumps. I've been pumping auto gas into my airplanes for almost 16 years and have yet to find water in it, other than that little bit that I sometimes let get in when there is water around the flush caps. To assure myself that I'm going to get good quality gas, I go to high volume stations where gas is fresh and not given time to build up moisture, etc. Granted, they may not check the gas for water every day; but, I can assure you that the average high volume gas station is going to sell far more gas than your average FBO any day of the week. I feel a lot better about that than pumping in some 100LL that's been sitting in a tank for a very long time. I'm betting that not every FBO does those water checks so religiously, either. BTW, when I do an annual, I have to open the bottom of the Facet fuel pump. If there is water in the catch basin, it's usually no more than a drop, or two. There is never enough to freeze the lines. When was the last time you had water freeze in your auto's gas lines? Maybe never? Same here. >The other problem with auto gas is foreign matter in the tank. Auto >fuel is not filtered from the semi, and probably only marginally at the >pump. Avgas is filtered as it comes off of the semi and goes into the >tank, and again when pumped into the truck, and a third time as it is >placed in the wing. Our filters are also changed every six months >whether they need it or not. Again we must chart quality control on >the amount of sediment that is present at the sumping of all tanks. >YOU become that quality control agent when using auto gas. A >close knit cloth would probably catch most if not all of the sediment >that I have seen, however there again our tanks are sumped daily. >Just look at the bottom of your gas can to see the problem. It only >takes one bit of gunk to clog a carburetor jet. It seems to me that I've read that the same trucks that carry avgas also carry auto gas. If that's true, which I have no reason to doubt, the same filters are used for both when that gas comes out of the trucks. I'm sure they don't make tankers for avgas and tankers for auto gas. They make tankers to carry gas, period. I'm betting the same process is used for both as it's pumped into the trucks. I may be wrong; but, it doesn't make sense not to go for quality control, no matter which gas is pumped into the tankers. As for the filters at the pumps, I can't say how often the pumps are changed at gas stations; but, I'm betting FBOs don't all follow the same schedules for changing them, either. Those things are expensive; so, I'm betting many FBOs hedge on changing them at regular intervals to cut down on costs. Our FBO depends on the local airport board to pay for changing them. How dependable do you think that is? :-) As for sediments actually getting into the cans, I've never seen any in mine. Using a good filter when filling the tanks is a good idea; but, I've never found anything to filter. That doesn't mean that all of us are careful. Some of us aren't. Some kind of filtering may be in order. BTW, I did find some sediment one time in my C172's tank. I couldn't figure out what it was until it finally dawned on me that it was an insect that had gotten into the vent and had been pushd into the tank and died. One question: How often do you change the fuel filter in your car? I'm terrible about that and don't do it until the car is about to die. I've only had to do that to one car. It had such a fine filter that I had to replace the filters at about 5000 miles. I've never had to replace a filter on any other vehicle I've owned. It would stand to reason that I would be changing filters on a regular basis if the auto fuel was that bad. The injectors would be clogging up and killing the engine. Not so. My vehicles go for many thousands of miles on the same filters. How about well over 100 thousand miles. I told you I was bad about it. So much for the dirty fuel theory, though. Oh, yeah. I had the opportunity to do the single venturi AD on the Cheetah. By that time, it had several hundred hours of running on auto gas. When I took the carb apart, the bowl was spotless. There is a screen on the fuel pickup, a screen on the Facet pump, and a screen on the carb. None that I can examine have dirt in them when I check them; but, I do feel good that any dirt large enough to close a jet is most likely going to come from the bowl, not from the fuel. >I am not trying to sell avgas by any means, but am genuinely >interested in your engine maintaining an adequate supply of fuel to >run on. Scrutinize what you pour into your tanks....your life may >depend on it. This is very good advice. Buying your auto gas from high volume stations and doing regular fuel sumping will go a long way to keeping a running engine. Many of you chose to put in gascolators; so, you'll have one more spot you can check for crud than I do. I can assure you that I worry far more about vapor locking with auto gas than I do about the dirt and water in it. Even vapor locking is a small problem that's easy to work around. I hope this helps those who may be interested in using auto gas. I'm going to archive this one. This discussion is too important not to. Jim Sears in KY RV-6A N198JS (77.9 on the tach. Mostly on auto gas) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Are Barstad" <abarstad(at)bconnex.net>
Subject: Do we prime Platenuts?
Date: Dec 09, 2000
Thanks for all the replies. I ended up shaking them around in a jar of MEK. I then primed the underside of the platenuts (since it's in contact the alodized spar). It may be overkill, but shouldn't hurt either. The MEK slightly had the color of the coating after cleaning and I was a bit worried about REMOVING the protective coat. Are RV-8 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Scott Pittman Sent: December 9, 2000 12:40 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: Do we prime Platenuts? Intresting thread. I agree that the black plate nuts are coated. I have had a box of them in the garage for 10 years and they look like new...unlike some of my steel tools (bucking bars, rivet sets, ect.) that rust so easily here in South Florida. It is so easy to prime them though, so why not? But, on the other hand, there are lots of other steel on aluminum parts that are not...bolts, washers, and pop rivets come to mind. Few people consider priming these parts over the coating. It is easy to get carried away with this priming thing. Scott Pittman RV-4 Wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Are Barstad" <abarstad(at)bconnex.net>
Subject: Countersinking perection
Date: Dec 09, 2000
I just discovered that all the holes I countersunk on the wingspar for the fuel tank attachment are somewhat oblong. Not alot, but oblong. It turns out that my countersink cage is not perfectly straight. It's so little that it's very hard to see, but I think this is the only way the holes can get enlarged in one direction. Anyone else exeperienced this? Hopefully, it will still be ok for strength. I tried another cage, another coutersink and another drill. It seems it's impossible to get it perfectly straight so the little 'nipple' on the countersink stays fixed in one spot. Am I to critical? Are RV-8 Wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ENewton57(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 09, 2000
Subject: Re: Countersinking perection
Are, Your countersink bit may "walking" a bit. Did you use any kind of backup to keep it centered. I got the idea from Sam Buccanan on how to keep the countersink centered in the hole. You can see it at the bottom of this page in his website: http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal/tanks.html God luck Eric Newton - Long Beach, Mississippi RV-6A N57ME (Reserved) (Fuselage) Eric's RV-6A Construction Page ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 09, 2000
From: Arthur Glaser <airplane(at)megsinet.net>
Subject: Re: Lycoming and Auto gas date.)
I am aware of one problem with auto gas that Greg did not mention. It was with a major company in New Jersey but not a Shell or Amoco type of major. I must have gotten a load of winter (high vapor pressure) gas in the summer. When I wheel landed at approximately 80 mph, the prop stopped. The gas was boiling in the gascolator. This has never happened with Shell, Amoco, or aviation fuel. Greg Richardson wrote: > > Fellow Listers: > > In regards to the other posts on this subject I thought I would weigh > in. I pump about 1000 gals of 100LL each summer weekend, and felt that some > quality control issues were being overlooked with auto gas. Consider that > your average gas station could care less about water, however to maintain a > dealership we not only have to drain all sumps of water daily, but also > maintain a log of such. The average gas station has no such sumps on their > tanks. Just ask them to pay for your fuel dry when your gas line freezes > this winter to find out how much they care about water in their fuel. In > this light it sounds as if the water separating funnel is a novel idea. > The other problem with auto gas is foreign matter in the tank. Auto > fuel is not filtered from the semi, and probably only marginally at the > pump. Avgas is filtered as it comes off of the semi and goes into the tank, > and again when pumped into the truck, and a third time as it is placed in > the wing. Our filters are also changed every six months whether they need > it or not. Again we must chart quality control on the amount of sediment > that is present at the sumping of all tanks. YOU become that quality > control agent when using auto gas. A close knit cloth would probably catch > most if not all of the sediment that I have seen, however there again our > tanks are sumped daily. Just look at the bottom of your gas can to see the > problem. It only takes one bit of gunk to clog a carburetor jet. > I am not trying to sell avgas by any means, but am genuinely interested > in your engine maintaining an adequate supply of fuel to run on. Scrutinize > what you pour into your tanks....your life may depend on it. > > Just my .02 worth. > > Greg > RV-9A emp > ________________________________________________________________________________ User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022
Date: Dec 09, 2000
Subject: yeller pages
From: "Denis (Bum) Walsh" <deniswalsh(at)earthlink.net>
Can someone please point me to the yeller pages? I have lost my address . Need to find the outfit in Niagra which sells new Nippondenso alternators. My % ##** Mark Landoll alternator has crapped out for the nth time. Thanks D Walsh ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jeff Orear" <jorear(at)mari.net>
Subject: Re: Countersinking perection
Date: Dec 09, 2000
Are: One thing that you should try is clamping a thick piece of aluminum with the same size hole under the hole that you are countersinking. Then the "nipple" on the countersinking bit will have more to guide on as you cut the countersink. Also won't allow the bit to wander and thus make your CS oblong. Try it...you'll like it! Regards, Jeff Orear RV6A fuse Peshtigo, WI -----Original Message----- From: Are Barstad <abarstad(at)bconnex.net> Date: Saturday, December 09, 2000 8:40 AM Subject: RV-List: Countersinking perection > >I just discovered that all the holes I countersunk on the wingspar for the >fuel tank attachment are somewhat oblong. Not alot, but oblong. It turns out >that my countersink cage is not perfectly straight. It's so little that it's >very hard to see, but I think this is the only way the holes can get >enlarged in one direction. > >Anyone else exeperienced this? Hopefully, it will still be ok for strength. >I tried another cage, another coutersink and another drill. It seems it's >impossible to get it perfectly straight so the little 'nipple' on the >countersink stays fixed in one spot. > >Am I to critical? > >Are >RV-8 Wings > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6bldr(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: yeller pages
Date: Dec 09, 2000
Try
http://www.sound.net/~hartmann/yelrpage.htm ----- Original Message ----- From: Denis (Bum) Walsh <deniswalsh(at)earthlink.net> Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2000 8:52 AM Subject: RV-List: yeller pages > > Can someone please point me to the yeller pages? I have lost my address . > > Need to find the outfit in Niagra which sells new Nippondenso alternators. > My % ##** Mark Landoll alternator has crapped out for the nth time. > > Thanks > > D Walsh > > ________________________________________________________________________________ User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022
Date: Dec 09, 2000
Subject: Re: yeller pages & Alternator
From: "Denis (Bum) Walsh" <deniswalsh(at)earthlink.net>
on 12/9/00 8:01, Jerry Calvert at rv6bldr(at)home.com wrote: > > Try http://www.sound.net/~hartmann/yelrpage.htm > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Denis (Bum) Walsh <deniswalsh(at)earthlink.net> > To: > Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2000 8:52 AM > Subject: RV-List: yeller pages > > > >> >> Can someone please point me to the yeller pages? I have lost my address . >> >> Need to find the outfit in Niagra which sells new Nippondenso alternators. >> My % ##** Mark Landoll alternator has crapped out for the nth time. >> >> Thanks >> >> D Walsh >> >> Thanks for the prompt response. I have meanwhile come to full wakefulness and found a link on the Doug Reeves site (what a marvelous thing!) Sure enough Niagra Air Parts was what I was looking for; however they apparently aren't open on saturday. Sigh. BTW if anyone has any negative experiences with this 40A alternator kit I haven't heard it. Sounds like a great way to go at $225. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rquinn1(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 09, 2000
Subject: Re: Nibbler
We used a Dremel tool with a cut off wheel. In fact we have used the Dremel tool through out the construction of our RV6A. We have a nibler but after using the nibler you will still need to smooth the cut. I know how hard it is to cut holes in your tenderly built wing Good luck. Rod & Rollie RV6A Finishing ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Petri" <dpetri(at)uswest.net>
Subject: Re: Lycoming and Auto gas date.)
Date: Dec 09, 2000
Has anyone had problems with ethanol in the auto fuel. From Nov through March the gas folks add some here in Colorado for the cold temps. TIA, Dave ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Shook" <billshook(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: TCAP breakfast
Date: Dec 09, 2000
That was a great fly in, and a joy to be at. I hitched a ride in Rick Caldwells beautiful RV-6 and got to witness first hand how far along his aerobatic training is coming. Very nice. The flight of 3 RV's in formation going down and back was truly an awesome sight. Two RV-4's flown by Bill and Bill the air force twins and Rick's -6. If you guys wonder where our tax dollars go, you should fly along with one of our X-military pilots. These two are extremely good pilots and Rick is coming right up behind them.......three very nice guys. Having three Bills and a Rick along made conversation pretty funny, but we managed. On the way back, I was allowed the opportunity to fly wing in a -4. Formation flying is a lot of fun, and I enjoyed sneaking it up in there far enough to make me nervous (about 5 feet further out than Bill typically flys without thinking about it). The feather light controls in dead calm air at 5000ft or so, really makes it a joy. Following that, we had a session of 'let the air force boys see how close they can follow in trail while dancing 3D in the clouds.' Rick hung right in there....a testimont to his skills for sure. Anyway, thanks Bernie for the invite and putting on a great fly in. Thanks to Rick for allowing me to tag along, and thanks to the Bill squared duo for showing us how it's done. I also got to meet a couple of the RV List types. Scott is as nice in person as he is in email...his lurking friends are as well....though they're more shy about posting. :-) I just had to razz them a bit, now didn't I? It's been a GREAT day. Bill -4 wings Heading out to the garage right now, motivation level is high. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 09, 2000
From: Dave Bristol <bj034(at)lafn.org>
Subject: Re: right wing heavy, which trailing edge to squeez
Carey, You squeeze the aileron on the "light" wing. Dave Rvmils(at)AOL.COM wrote: > > My right wing is about 2 lbs heavy in and I wondering which trailing edge to > squeez. > Thanks, > Carey Mills > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Terry Burch" <rv6man(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: right wing heavy, which trailing edge to squeez
Date: Dec 09, 2000
----- Original Message ----- From: <Rvmils(at)AOL.COM> Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2000 12:53 AM Subject: RV-List: right wing heavy, which trailing edge to squeez > > My right wing is about 2 lbs heavy in and I wondering which trailing edge to > squeez. > Thanks, > Carey Mills > > Squeezing has its draw backs.As you squeeze, the stick forces go up. It takes alot less than you think to add alot of stick force. For some this does not matter. Just a caution.Terry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 09, 2000
From: Doyal Plute <dplute(at)horizon.hit.net>
Subject: carb nuts?
what kind of nuts are used to install carb to 0-360? elastic stop nuts or steel stop nuts? thanks: Doyal ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 10, 2000
From: Bruce Gray <brucegray(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: carb nuts?
Lycoming has typically used a flat washer, internal star washer, nut combination. Elastic or steel stop nuts will not stand up to repeated thermal cycles. Bruce Glasair III Doyal Plute wrote: > > what kind of nuts are used to install carb to 0-360? elastic stop nuts > or steel stop nuts? > thanks: > Doyal > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 09, 2000
From: Gordon Robertson <gordon(at)safemail.com>
Subject: Wing lights
From: "Cliff Begnaud" <Shoeless(at)barefootpilot.com> Subject: RV-List: Nibbler I'm planning for the leading edge wing light in my -9. A hole has to be cut in the wing leading edge and I'm assuming that this is done with a nibbler. I would greatly appreciate hearing from someone who has done this. Exactly which tool should I purchase for this job? Thanks, Cliff RV9A (N782PC -reserved) Empennage, wing arrives near christmas Cliff -- I used a 2" cut-off disk in a die grinder. Worked great, but be careful. It is very aggressive. ps. The die grinder is one of the most useful tools I own. And it was only $20. Gordon Robertson RV8 sb wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Lkyswede(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 10, 2000
Subject: Re: Electric Prime
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 09, 2000
From: Gordon Robertson <gordon(at)safemail.com>
Subject: 24v pitot heater
Hi, I know very little about electrical so here is the question....I have Bob's Book..... I just bought a new surplus Heated pitot tube, AN5812-1 "L" shaped. The catch is that it is 24 volts. I hooked it up to my 12 volt 15amp power supply to see what would happen. The results were 225 degrees were produced at the tip and it showed 3 amps of current. I left it on for about 10 minutes and it didn't blow the 5 amp CB I put in line. So the question is, Am I looking for trouble running this in a 12 volt system or will it only put out a lower amount of heat. It seems like the 225 degrees would be adequate for deicing. Thank You, Ed Perry RV8QB 180/CS Heated Pitot? Ed, If it really is a 24 volt unit, then at 12 volts it will draw about half the current, and since the voltage is half as well, it will consume about 1/4 the power. The formula is W = (Voltage squared) divided by Resistance where W is the power in watts. The resistance is fixed by the design. So you can see that at half the voltage, the power is one quarter. The temperature may be 225 degrees, but with the airflow at a very low temperature, you need a lot of power to melt the ice. So I think your 24V unit will not work for you at 12 volts. Gordon Robertson RV8 sb wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Fran Malczynski" <ebafm(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Firewall Forward Stuff
Date: Dec 10, 2000
Listers, I've searched the archives for answers to the following questions, but haven't come up with anything. Hope you can help. I have an O360-A2A from Aerosport Power that has a Precision MA-4-5 carb and a Nippon Denso alternator. 1.) On the instructions for the alternator it says to hook the wire labeled IGN to plus power. I have a yellow wire and a green wire going into a Molex ? connector on the alternator and see no labeling around them. Any idea which wire is the IGN wire? 2.) The fuel line to the carb connects to an AN823-6 elbow that is connected to a coupling nut marked 68-93 that looks like it's a pipe thread to union fitting screwed into the inlet port on the carb through a copper washer. My question is: Should there be something other then the copper washer that seals this connection? 3.) Also, what is the torque value I should use on the nuts to attach the carb to the engine? 4.) The "P" lead connection on the left magneto has a phenolic washer, an internal tooth washer and a nut on the "P" stud. This may sound like a stupid question but where in this sequence does the ring terminal for the "P' lead go? Whats the function of the phenolic washer.? Thanks for any help. Fran Malczynski RV6 (finish) O360, Performance Propellars Inc. prop Olcott, Ny ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "tdale4" <tdale4(at)email.msn.com>
Subject: RV6A or 9A
Date: Dec 10, 2000
Can anyone tell me the main differences between the RV6A and the RV9A? I've looked at Van's homepage but the both look so similar. I guess the 9A is better if you don't plan on doing aerobatics????? It seems easier to build, almost as fast with a smaller engine, and a little larger inside. Any opinions would be greatly appreciated. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 09, 2000
Subject: Re: Bird strikes
From: cecilth(at)juno.com
> > On reading your post why did my mind go immediately to the thought?: > Just imagine if deer could fly! > > Jim They do . . . at an altitude of about 10 feet AGL. Cecil ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 10, 2000
From: Charlie and Tupper England <cengland(at)netdoor.com>
Subject: Re: 12V power sources
Im7shannon(at)AOL.COM wrote: > > > OK, who is going to field electrical questions now that Bob has dropped off? > I used an old cell phone cigarette lighter adapter to power up a used T&B I > bought to see if the gyro would run and it worked fine, I was thinking about > using the other old cell phone house current adapter to see if it would work > in the shop to power up instruments. Anyone tried this or have any thoughts? > Kevin Shannon > -9A just rolled over canoe > electrically challenged > It's doubtful it will have enough current to run anything with a motor in it. If the voltage is correct, you could use it as a 'trickle charger' to keep a small gel cell battery charged, & use that to power your instruments. Gel cells can be purchased for ~$10 from burglar alarm supply houses or even Radio Shack. Charlie ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Harvey Sigmon" <flyhars(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: RE: RV6-List: carb nuts?
Date: Dec 10, 2000
Doyal: Use Steel nuts, course thread and lock washer. ----- Original Message ----- From: Doyal Plute Sent: 12/9/00 11:44:25 PM Subject: RV6-List: carb nuts? -- RV6-List message posted by: Doyal Plute dplute(at)horizon.hit.net what kind of nuts are used to install carb to 0-360? elastic stop nuts or steel stop nuts? thanks: Doyal http://www.matronics.com/order --- Harvey Sigmon --- flyhars(at)earthlink.net --- EarthLink: It's your Internet. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 10, 2000
From: "Douglas E. Bostard" <dougacft(at)jps.net>
Subject: Re: RV6-List Digest: 1 Msgs - 12/09/00
don't quote me but I was instructed to use ordinary coarse thread (if I recall) hardware store nuts with star lockwashers. It's been a while, but you may find that's the thread category on the studs. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 10, 2000
From: Charlie Kuss <chaskuss(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: 24v pitot heater
> > I know very little about electrical so here is the question....I have > Bob's > Book..... > > I just bought a new surplus Heated pitot tube, AN5812-1 "L" shaped. The > catch is that it is 24 volts. I hooked it up to my 12 volt 15amp power > supply to see what would happen. The results were 225 degrees were > produced > at the tip and it showed 3 amps of current. I left it on for about 10 > minutes and it didn't blow the 5 amp CB I put in line. > So the question is, Am I looking for trouble running this in a 12 volt > system or will it only put out a lower amount of heat. It seems like the > 225 > degrees would be adequate for deicing. > > Thank You, > Ed Perry > RV8QB 180/CS Heated Pitot? > > Ed, > If it really is a 24 volt unit, then at 12 volts it will draw about half > the current, and since the voltage is half as well, it will consume > about 1/4 the power. The formula is > > W = (Voltage squared) divided by Resistance > > where W is the power in watts. The resistance is fixed by the design. > So you can see that at half the voltage, the power is one quarter. > > The temperature may be 225 degrees, but with the airflow at a very low > temperature, you need a lot of power to melt the ice. So I think your > 24V unit will not work for you at 12 volts. > > Gordon Robertson > RV8 sb wings Listers, I'm afraid that Gordon has this backwards. The total watts used is constant. Therefore using half the voltage (12 versus 24) the amperage will double to obtain the same wattage. George is correct that this 24 volt heater will work with 12 volts. It simply uses twice the current. The only advantage to the 24 volt system is that the supply and ground wires can be of a smaller gauge (slightly lighter) wire. Charlie Kuss RV-8A finishing wings and starting fuselage Boca Raton, Fl. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Are Barstad" <abarstad(at)bconnex.net>
Subject: Aileron bellcrank
Date: Dec 10, 2000
I indeed discovered that the empennage kit have much more detailed drawings and instructions than the wing kit. The aileron bellcrank: I noticed that on a couple of occasions (plus one for tie-down bars), the callout for bolts are different than what is supplied. Luckily, it looks like the callout is wrong, not what they supplied. My drawing call for no washers on any of the bellcrank bolts to be placed under the bolt head (except for the bolt that goes through the bushing). Is this right? If I do place washers under the heads, the bolts as supplied will be too short. It just seems strange not to use washers under the bolt head. Are RV-8 Wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rvmils(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 10, 2000
Subject: N286RV flies!!
It was awesome. My brother and I put over 6 hours on it yesterday. We had a heavy right wing, squeezed the left aileron and now it flies hands off. Performance at a 1000 w/0360 and culver prop is 173mph @2400, 182 @ 2500, and 193 @ 2640 max rpm. The max rpm should go up as the engine breaks in and that was with no wheel pants. I can't believe how easy this plane is to fly, land, and handle on the ground, and I can't wait for the rest of you to find out. What a joy to fly!!! Many thanks to list. Blue Skies, Carey Mills RV4 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Robert Di Meo" <bdimeo(at)mediaone.net>
Subject: Aileron bellcrank
Date: Dec 10, 2000
Are, The reason you don't see washers called out is that the head of bolt is going to be on steel so the shoulder on the head of the bolt (look carefully and you'll see the underside of the head is not perfectly flat but there is a shoulder there) is good enough. Bob RV8#423 unpacking fuselage kit! Bob -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Are Barstad Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 10:47 AM Subject: RV-List: Aileron bellcrank I indeed discovered that the empennage kit have much more detailed drawings and instructions than the wing kit. The aileron bellcrank: I noticed that on a couple of occasions (plus one for tie-down bars), the callout for bolts are different than what is supplied. Luckily, it looks like the callout is wrong, not what they supplied. My drawing call for no washers on any of the bellcrank bolts to be placed under the bolt head (except for the bolt that goes through the bushing). Is this right? If I do place washers under the heads, the bolts as supplied will be too short. It just seems strange not to use washers under the bolt head. Are RV-8 Wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chuck Rabaut" <crabaut(at)coalinga.com>
Subject: Re: N286RV flies!!
Date: Dec 10, 2000
Carey, Okay... I'm ready to find out how wonderful "It Flys!!!". I'll be over to pick it up in the morning. Chuck P.S. Congratulations, we all share your joy & excitement. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 10, 2000
From: Kevin Horton <khorton(at)cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: 24v pitot heater
> >> >> I know very little about electrical so here is the question....I have >> Bob's >> Book..... >> >> I just bought a new surplus Heated pitot tube, AN5812-1 "L" shaped. The >> catch is that it is 24 volts. I hooked it up to my 12 volt 15amp power >> supply to see what would happen. The results were 225 degrees were >> produced >> at the tip and it showed 3 amps of current. I left it on for about 10 >> minutes and it didn't blow the 5 amp CB I put in line. >> So the question is, Am I looking for trouble running this in a 12 volt >> system or will it only put out a lower amount of heat. It seems like the >> 225 >> degrees would be adequate for deicing. >> >> Thank You, >> Ed Perry >> RV8QB 180/CS Heated Pitot? >> >> Ed, >> If it really is a 24 volt unit, then at 12 volts it will draw about half >> the current, and since the voltage is half as well, it will consume >> about 1/4 the power. The formula is >> >> W = (Voltage squared) divided by Resistance >> >> where W is the power in watts. The resistance is fixed by the design. >> So you can see that at half the voltage, the power is one quarter. >> >> The temperature may be 225 degrees, but with the airflow at a very low >> temperature, you need a lot of power to melt the ice. So I think your >> 24V unit will not work for you at 12 volts. >> >> Gordon Robertson >> RV8 sb wings > >Listers, > I'm afraid that Gordon has this backwards. The total watts used is >constant. Therefore using half the voltage (12 versus 24) the amperage will >double to obtain the same wattage. George is correct that this 24 volt >heater will work with 12 volts. It simply uses twice the current. The only >advantage to the 24 volt system is that the supply and ground wires can be >of a smaller gauge (slightly lighter) wire. >Charlie Kuss >RV-8A finishing wings and starting fuselage >Boca Raton, Fl. > Time out here. The physical characteristic of the tube that drives the calculation is the resistance. Assuming the resistance of the heater is constant, halving the voltage will give half the current. Power equals current times voltage, so the power would be one quarter as much. In reality, the resistance increases as the temperature increases. This unit will operate at a lower temperature with 12v than with 24v, so the resistance will be a bit lower. This will cause it to draw a bit more current than this back of the envelope calculation indicates, and the power will be somewhat more than one quarter as much. The big problem here is that we don't know how much the airflow over the pitot head will decrease its temperature. If this was my aircraft, I would look for a 12v tube, unless you are prepared to have a frozen pitot tube, in which case why bother with the heated tube at all? Charlie - if you want a physical demonstration of the effect of voltage on the power that is developed, try hooking a 12v light bulb up to 120v.Under your theory, it should only draw 1/10 as much current, to keep the same wattage. Thus that 12v should last forever on a 120v circuit. In fact, that bulb will put out many times its rated wattage for a fraction of a second, then the filament will overheat and burn out. -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (fuselage 95% done) Ottawa, Canada http://eccentrix.com/misc/rv8/rv8.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson(at)carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: 24v pitot heater
Date: Dec 10, 2000
Well here goes my 0.02, hoping it has not been too many years. The pitot heating is accomplished by a resistive element placed in the pitot tube. The resistance stays essentially the same (actually there is probably some small change as the temperature increases) regardless of the voltage applied. Therefore if 12V is applied to a resistive element designed to produce X watts of power at 24 volts it will produce 1/4X watts at 12Volts. This is from the basic relationship of I=E/R or current Voltage/Resistance. So it follows that if the Voltage is halved from 24 to 12 volts and the resistance remains the same the current flow with 12 volts will also be 1/2 of the current with 24 volts.. Since one expression of electrical Power =E*I, then with 1/2 the voltage applied (i.e 12Volts vice 24 Volts) and 1/2 the current flowing due to the reduced voltage, the power will actually be 1/4 the value at 12Volts compared to 24Volts. You get the same results with the equivalent equation of Power = I 2*R Practical example. Assuming resistance of 10 ohms. Then at 24 Volts, I 24/10 or 2.4 amps. If you apply 12 volts, then I (current) =12/10 or 1.2 amps (1/2 the I value at 24 volts). So for power at 24 volts, P=I*E 24*2.4 57.6 watts. At 12 Volts, P=12/1.2 = 14.4 Watts. 57.6/4 = 14.4 showing that the power at 12 volts is 1/4 that of the value generated with 24 volts. So, I think with that much less than the designed powered using 12 volts you face the serious risk that the pitot tube would not generate sufficient heat to keep the ice off (all depends on the environmental conditions of course) Ed Anderson then the power will > > > > > I know very little about electrical so here is the question....I have > > Bob's > > Book..... > > > > I just bought a new surplus Heated pitot tube, AN5812-1 "L" shaped. The > > catch is that it is 24 volts. I hooked it up to my 12 volt 15amp power > > supply to see what would happen. The results were 225 degrees were > > produced > > at the tip and it showed 3 amps of current. I left it on for about 10 > > minutes and it didn't blow the 5 amp CB I put in line. > > So the question is, Am I looking for trouble running this in a 12 volt > > system or will it only put out a lower amount of heat. It seems like the > > 225 > > degrees would be adequate for deicing. > > > > Thank You, > > Ed Perry > > RV8QB 180/CS Heated Pitot? > > > > Ed, > > If it really is a 24 volt unit, then at 12 volts it will draw about half > > the current, and since the voltage is half as well, it will consume > > about 1/4 the power. The formula is > > > > W = (Voltage squared) divided by Resistance > > > > where W is the power in watts. The resistance is fixed by the design. > > So you can see that at half the voltage, the power is one quarter. > > > > The temperature may be 225 degrees, but with the airflow at a very low > > temperature, you need a lot of power to melt the ice. So I think your > > 24V unit will not work for you at 12 volts. > > > > Gordon Robertson > > RV8 sb wings > > Listers, > I'm afraid that Gordon has this backwards. The total watts used is > constant. Therefore using half the voltage (12 versus 24) the amperage will > double to obtain the same wattage. George is correct that this 24 volt > heater will work with 12 volts. It simply uses twice the current. The only > advantage to the 24 volt system is that the supply and ground wires can be > of a smaller gauge (slightly lighter) wire. > Charlie Kuss > RV-8A finishing wings and starting fuselage > Boca Raton, Fl. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Todd Houg <thoug(at)ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Subject: Re: 24v pitot heater
Date: Dec 10, 2000
>> Ed, >> If it really is a 24 volt unit, then at 12 volts it will draw about half >> the current, and since the voltage is half as well, it will consume >> about 1/4 the power. The formula is >> >> W = (Voltage squared) divided by Resistance >> >> where W is the power in watts. The resistance is fixed by the design. >> So you can see that at half the voltage, the power is one quarter. >> >> The temperature may be 225 degrees, but with the airflow at a very low >> temperature, you need a lot of power to melt the ice. So I think your >> 24V unit will not work for you at 12 volts. >> >> Gordon Robertson >> RV8 sb wings >Listers, >I'm afraid that Gordon has this backwards. The total watts used is >constant. Therefore using half the voltage (12 versus 24) the amperage will >double to obtain the same wattage. George is correct that this 24 volt >heater will work with 12 volts. It simply uses twice the current. The only >advantage to the 24 volt system is that the supply and ground wires can be >of a smaller gauge (slightly lighter) wire. >Charlie Kuss >RV-8A finishing wings and starting fuselage >Boca Raton, Fl. I'm sorry Charlie, but I have to respectfully disagree with you on this one. The Wattage is NOT constant and is exactly as Gordon points out, proportional to the square of the voltage (given a constant resistance). If the resistance of the heating element were constant throughout the temperature range of the heating element, then the wattage would be 1/4 that of operating at 24V. However, one thing that Gordon overlooked is the fact that a heating element has a non-linear resistance with respect to temperature. As the heating element gets hotter, the resistance goes up. Thus at 24 volts you won't have twice the current as you did at 12V. In order to determine the actual thermal heat output it would be best to measure the current operating at both 12V and 24V and then use that to determine the relative power used (and consequentially the amount of heat being generated). With out these measurements, I wouldn NOT go so far as to say the pitot heat would not work at 12V. One thing that may have lead to some confusion if the concept using smaller gauge wire to deliver the same power at 24V. Given two devices both requiring the same power (wattage) one designed for 12V and one for 24V, it is correct that the 24V device will require half the current and require a smaller gauge wire. However the key difference is that these two devices will have different loads (or resistances) which accounts for the reduced current of the 24V device. Does this help or make things muddier? Todd Houg RV-9A Empennage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "kogrh" <kogrh(at)willinet.net>
Subject: Re: N286RV flies!!
Date: Dec 10, 2000
----- Original Message ----- From: <Rvmils(at)AOL.COM> Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 10:00 AM Subject: RV-List: N286RV flies!! > > It was awesome. My brother and I put over 6 hours on it yesterday. We had a > heavy right wing, squeezed the left aileron and now it flies hands off. > Performance at a 1000 w/0360 and culver prop is 173mph @2400, 182 @ 2500, and > 193 @ 2640 max rpm. The max rpm should go up as the engine breaks in and > that was with no wheel pants. I can't believe how easy this plane is to fly, > land, and handle on the ground, and I can't wait for the rest of you to find > out. What a joy to fly!!! Many thanks to list. > Blue Skies, > Carey Mills > RV4 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "kogrh" <kogrh(at)willinet.net>
Subject: Re: N286RV flies!!
Date: Dec 10, 2000
----- Original Message ----- From: <Rvmils(at)AOL.COM> Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 10:00 AM Subject: RV-List: N286RV flies!! > > It was awesome. My brother and I put over 6 hours on it yesterday. We had a > heavy right wing, squeezed the left aileron and now it flies hands off. > Performance at a 1000 w/0360 and culver prop is 173mph @2400, 182 @ 2500, and > 193 @ 2640 max rpm. The max rpm should go up as the engine breaks in and > that was with no wheel pants. I can't believe how easy this plane is to fly, > land, and handle on the ground, and I can't wait for the rest of you to find > out. What a joy to fly!!! Many thanks to list. > Blue Skies, > Carey Mills > RV4 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 10, 2000
From: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv(at)teleport.com>
Subject: Re: RV6A or 9A
ENewton57(at)AOL.COM wrote: > > > In a message dated 12/10/00 8:05:54 AM Central Standard Time, > tdale4(at)email.msn.com writes: > > < looked at Van's homepage but the both look so similar. I guess the 9A is > better if you don't plan on doing aerobatics????? It seems easier to build, > almost as fast with a smaller engine, and a little larger inside. Any > opinions would be greatly appreciated. >> > > Actually you got it backwards. The 9A is not rated for aerobatics and the 6A > is. > > In theory, the 6A is a little faster than the 9A however recent, unofficial > tests have proven the 9A similarly configered is about as fast as the 6A. > (the 9A had a MT tri-blade prop and the 6A didn't). > > The 9A is definitely easier (and faster) to build. The parts are all > prepunched and its basically just gets put together. The 6A wings and > empennage is pre-punched but the fuselage is not and must be drilled. Also, > the 6 can be built as a taildragger if you want. > > It gets down to what your flying preferences are. If want a good > cross-country machine and plan on going into short fields the 9A is the plane > for you. If you want to do recreational aerobatics, the 6A (or 6) is the way > to go. > > Hope this helps, > Eric Newton - Long Beach, Mississippi > RV-6A N57ME (Reserved) (Fuselage) > In additioon I well add that the 9A has a longer wing with different airfoil. This wing well allow the 9A to fly slower which means that you can also land at a slower speed. Jerry ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rick Jory" <rickjory(at)email.msn.com>
Subject: 12V Source
Date: Dec 10, 2000
For those interested in having a 12v "source" for something requiring a cigarette lighter receptacle (for example, a portable GPS), I picked up a nice looking receptacle (power outlet) and cap at my local Chrysler dealer. The part numbers are 4685591 and 4793554 . . . $3.60 and $10.75. The "cap" is the base that the receptacle slides down into . . . the cap is attached to it (i.e. won't fall off) and is labeled "Power Outlet 12v - 20A". I think it will do the trick and will look quite pleasing. Rick Jory, Highlands Ranch, CO RV8A QB ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 10, 2000
From: Charlie Kuss <chaskuss(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: 24v pitot heater
Kevin Thanks. I stand corrected. Charlie > > > Time out here. The physical characteristic of the tube that drives > the calculation is the resistance. Assuming the resistance of the > heater is constant, halving the voltage will give half the current. > Power equals current times voltage, so the power would be one quarter > as much. In reality, the resistance increases as the temperature > increases. This unit will operate at a lower temperature with 12v > than with 24v, so the resistance will be a bit lower. This will > cause it to draw a bit more current than this back of the envelope > calculation indicates, and the power will be somewhat more than one > quarter as much. > > The big problem here is that we don't know how much the airflow over > the pitot head will decrease its temperature. If this was my > aircraft, I would look for a 12v tube, unless you are prepared to > have a frozen pitot tube, in which case why bother with the heated > tube at all? > > Charlie - if you want a physical demonstration of the effect of > voltage on the power that is developed, try hooking a 12v light bulb > up to 120v.Under your theory, it should only draw 1/10 as much > current, to keep the same wattage. Thus that 12v should last forever > on a 120v circuit. In fact, that bulb will put out many times its > rated wattage for a fraction of a second, then the filament will > overheat and burn out. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 10, 2000
From: Bruce Knoll <tripod(at)oneimage.com>
Subject: Differences of empennage 6A vs 9A
Listers, What are the differences between the empennage of the 6 vs the 9. Are they interchangeable? BFK ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Todd Houg <thoug(at)ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Subject: Differences of empennage 6A vs 9A
Date: Dec 10, 2000
>Listers, > >What are the differences between the empennage of the 6 vs the 9. Are they >interchangeable? > >BFK Bruce, The empennage of the 9A and 6A are not interchangeable. The horizontal stabilizer of the -9 is a constant chord design, while the -6 is a tapered chord being narrower at the tip. As such, there are no common parts in the HS or elevators. The vertical stabilizer is identical and shares parts between the -6 and -9, however the rudder of the -9 is significantly larger. The -9 rudder is several inches taller (extending further above the VS) and several inches longer providing much more rudder control surface for effectiveness at the slower speeds that the -9 will fly at. Of course all of the -9 parts (with the exception of the VS ribs) are match drilled to make assembly much easier. Because the VS parts are common, the ribs were not match drilled to the skin. It wasn't until I got to the VS that I had to actually THINK about where to drill a hole! Todd Houg RV-9A Empennage - Fiberglass work - Ugh! St. Francis, MN ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HCRV6(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 10, 2000
Subject: Re: yeller pages
http://www.sound.net/~hartmann/yelrpage.htm Harry Crosby Pleasanton, California RV-6, working on canopy installation ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 10, 2000
Subject: Re: RV6A or 9A
In a message dated 12/10/00 6:31:13 AM Pacific Standard Time, ENewton57(at)AOL.COM writes: << <> Actually you got it backwards. The 9A is not rated for aerobatics and the 6A is. >> Eric- Isn't that what he said????? -GV (RV-6A N1GV) vanremog(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Hurlbut" <shurlbut(at)island.net>
Subject: Re: Differences of empennage 6A vs 9A
Date: Dec 10, 2000
They are completely different. The 9A has a constant chord. Its a simple rectangle. The 6A tapers toward the Horizontal Stab tips. They are not interchangeable without a lot of work. Steve Hurlbut Comox, BC shurlbut(at)island.net ----- Original Message ----- From: Bruce Knoll <tripod(at)oneimage.com> Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 10:49 AM Subject: RV-List: Differences of empennage 6A vs 9A > > Listers, > > What are the differences between the empennage of the 6 vs the 9. Are they > interchangeable? > > BFK > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 10, 2000
From: Dan & Patty Krueger <pndkrueg(at)gulfsurf.infi.net>
Subject: Re: Electric Prime
> > Also, A/S catalog says that the "A' port is input, and "P" port is outlet. > Mine has no such markings....instead has "1" and "2". A/S told me that "2" was in and "1" was out. I mounted mine with a two hole conduit clamp - just large enough that I could put some thin rubber between the clamp and solenoid for protection. Also rested it on a small piece of angle to keep the valve from sliding down. Dan Krueger Panel & wiring ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 10, 2000
From: Charlie and Tupper England <cengland(at)netdoor.com>
Subject: Re: 12V power sources
"Stephen J. Soule" wrote: > > > If it were used to trickle charge the battery, what could I rig up to avoid > overcharging the battery? > snips Salvaging a celphone charger for this implies cheap (a good thing, to me). Smart chargers imply expensive. Rig an a/c outlet so the charger comes on when your shop lights come on. If the battery says it's charged (12-14v without the charger) & you aren't going to use it soon, disconnect the charger until next use, or charge it again for a few hours after a few weeks. Don't forget to check the no-load voltage output of the charger. It should be around 12-15 volts when hooked to a fully charged 12v battery. If you are really uncertain about all this, just spring for the $50 or so for a small bench power supply. It won't power your entire panel at once, but you can test individual instruments with it. Charlie ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 10, 2000
From: pdsmith <pdsmith(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: Canopy Bow, Side Rail Alignment
Stuart: I'm assuming that you're referring to the rollover bar - if you are, I had exactly the same problem. In the end Van's said that if it could not be shimmed acceptably, they would pay to have it rewelded. Since I couldn't find anyone local who wanted to tackle the job, I made a box & sent it back to Van's. Scott R. arranged for Phil Duyck in the prototype shop to reweld it according to my photographs and written description. They turned it around in a couple of days. The fit is now 95% good. A little persuasion in a vise should get the flange to fit perfectly now. I'll know later today when I evert the fuselage - right now it's upside down after the landing gear fitting. I'd also suggets (per Van's) checking your QB fuselage width - some of them have come out a little wide & that's what may be affecting the roll bar fit. I discovered this too late to do anything - it also may affect the fit of the F821forward top skin. Becase of this, my edge distance is marginal at the aftmost holes along the longerons. Good luck, Phil Smith, 80691 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Douglas G. Murray" <dgmurray(at)telusplanet.net>
Subject: Re: RV6A or 9A
Date: Dec 10, 2000
Don't forget the fact that the fuselage is longer on the 9A and the landing gear is alot different on the 9A Douglas G. Murray Southern Alberta ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Springer" <jsflyrv(at)teleport.com> Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 10:04 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: RV6A or 9A > > ENewton57(at)AOL.COM wrote: > > > > > > In a message dated 12/10/00 8:05:54 AM Central Standard Time, > > tdale4(at)email.msn.com writes: > > > > < > looked at Van's homepage but the both look so similar. I guess the 9A is > > better if you don't plan on doing aerobatics????? It seems easier to build, > > almost as fast with a smaller engine, and a little larger inside. Any > > opinions would be greatly appreciated. >> > > > > Actually you got it backwards. The 9A is not rated for aerobatics and the 6A > > is. > > > > In theory, the 6A is a little faster than the 9A however recent, unofficial > > tests have proven the 9A similarly configered is about as fast as the 6A. > > (the 9A had a MT tri-blade prop and the 6A didn't). > > > > The 9A is definitely easier (and faster) to build. The parts are all > > prepunched and its basically just gets put together. The 6A wings and > > empennage is pre-punched but the fuselage is not and must be drilled. Also, > > the 6 can be built as a taildragger if you want. > > > > It gets down to what your flying preferences are. If want a good > > cross-country machine and plan on going into short fields the 9A is the plane > > for you. If you want to do recreational aerobatics, the 6A (or 6) is the way > > to go. > > > > Hope this helps, > > Eric Newton - Long Beach, Mississippi > > RV-6A N57ME (Reserved) (Fuselage) > > > > In additioon I well add that the 9A has a longer wing with different > airfoil. This wing well allow the 9A to fly slower which means that > you can also land at a slower speed. > > Jerry > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: Re: Tool for AMP connectors on Whelan strobes
Date: Dec 10, 2000
> I'm installing the power supply and wiring for my Whelan strobe > system. I've got the one with the big single power supply. The kit > from Vans comes with a bunch of AMPCPS-3 connectors. I need to know > what kind of tool I need to put the pins on the wires. > > Looking at the Aeroelectric Connection web site, I see that Bob sells > a tool that might be what I need. Is his BCT-1 tool the one I should > be buying? I don't have any decent crimping tools now, so I need to > get whichever tool(s) I will need to finish this project. I think a > combination of the BCT-1 and the RCT-1 might do everything except the > battery cables. Comments? Kevin, Whelen uses the AMP Mate-N-Lok series connectors with .082" pins. Yes, Bob's BCT-1 will do the trick. It should also work on Molex brand connectors which crimp the same way but which are not compatible with the Mate-N-Lock connectors or pins at all. You will likely encouter, or want to use, Molex connectors elsewhere in the plane. You might as well get his RCT-1 and RCT-2 while you're at it since you'll probably need to do your own antenna leads. And while your at it you might as well buy some RG400 coax for your antennas. And while your at it you might as well pick up a few... Randy Lervold RV-8, N558RL, painting, then final wiring & systems hook-up www.rv-8.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "dave ford" <dford(at)michweb.net>
Subject: cabin floor
Date: Dec 10, 2000
From archives: Cabin noise can be significantly reduces by adding a floor over the stiffeners, with closed cell foam (available frome Spruce & Speciallty) between the stiffeners. Also, if you have an exhaust system with straight pipes, find a way to point them down. I think (but am not sure) that Veterman now has curved extensions for his straight pipe system. Call him for advice. Fred Stucklen RV-6A N925RV For those who have installed a cabin floor which would raise your heels toward rudder & brake pedals--does that require adjusting the height of the pedals? Also is anyone using the curved pipe extensions? Dave Ford RV6 fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 10, 2000
From: earl fortner <e.fortner(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: 24v pitot heater
You are correct unless the democrats get hold ohm's and repeal it. Earl RV4 Ed Anderson wrote: > > > Well here goes my 0.02, hoping it has not been too many years. > > The pitot heating is accomplished by a resistive element placed in the > pitot tube. The resistance stays essentially the same (actually there is > probably some small change as the temperature increases) regardless of the > voltage applied. Therefore if 12V is applied to a resistive element > designed to produce X watts of power at 24 volts it will produce 1/4X watts > at 12Volts. This is from the basic relationship of I=E/R or current > Voltage/Resistance. So it follows that if the Voltage is halved from 24 to > 12 volts and the resistance remains the same the current flow with 12 volts > will also be 1/2 of the current with 24 volts.. Since one expression of > electrical Power =E*I, then with 1/2 the voltage applied (i.e 12Volts vice > 24 Volts) and 1/2 the current flowing due to the reduced voltage, the power > will actually be 1/4 the value at 12Volts compared to 24Volts. > You get the same results with the equivalent equation of Power = I 2*R > > Practical example. Assuming resistance of 10 ohms. Then at 24 Volts, I > 24/10 or 2.4 amps. If you apply 12 volts, then I (current) =12/10 or 1.2 > amps (1/2 the I value at 24 volts). So for power at 24 volts, P=I*E > 24*2.4 > 57.6 watts. At 12 Volts, P=12/1.2 = 14.4 Watts. 57.6/4 = 14.4 showing that > the power at 12 volts is 1/4 that of the value generated with 24 volts. > > So, I think with that much less than the designed powered using 12 volts you > face the serious risk that the pitot tube would not generate sufficient heat > to keep the ice off (all depends on the environmental conditions of course) > > Ed Anderson > > then the power will > > > > > > > > > I know very little about electrical so here is the question....I have > > > Bob's > > > Book..... > > > > > > I just bought a new surplus Heated pitot tube, AN5812-1 "L" shaped. The > > > catch is that it is 24 volts. I hooked it up to my 12 volt 15amp power > > > supply to see what would happen. The results were 225 degrees were > > > produced > > > at the tip and it showed 3 amps of current. I left it on for about 10 > > > minutes and it didn't blow the 5 amp CB I put in line. > > > So the question is, Am I looking for trouble running this in a 12 volt > > > system or will it only put out a lower amount of heat. It seems like the > > > 225 > > > degrees would be adequate for deicing. > > > > > > Thank You, > > > Ed Perry > > > RV8QB 180/CS Heated Pitot? > > > > > > Ed, > > > If it really is a 24 volt unit, then at 12 volts it will draw about half > > > the current, and since the voltage is half as well, it will consume > > > about 1/4 the power. The formula is > > > > > > W = (Voltage squared) divided by Resistance > > > > > > where W is the power in watts. The resistance is fixed by the design. > > > So you can see that at half the voltage, the power is one quarter. > > > > > > The temperature may be 225 degrees, but with the airflow at a very low > > > temperature, you need a lot of power to melt the ice. So I think your > > > 24V unit will not work for you at 12 volts. > > > > > > Gordon Robertson > > > RV8 sb wings > > > > Listers, > > I'm afraid that Gordon has this backwards. The total watts used is > > constant. Therefore using half the voltage (12 versus 24) the amperage > will > > double to obtain the same wattage. George is correct that this 24 volt > > heater will work with 12 volts. It simply uses twice the current. The only > > advantage to the 24 volt system is that the supply and ground wires can be > > of a smaller gauge (slightly lighter) wire. > > Charlie Kuss > > RV-8A finishing wings and starting fuselage > > Boca Raton, Fl. > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cliff Begnaud" <Shoeless(at)barefootpilot.com>
Subject: Re: Lycoming and Auto gas date.)
Date: Dec 09, 2000
Greg, This is an interesting post. My wife and I have put 530 hours on our kitfox over the last year and a half, burning autogas dispensed at our local airport. I once talked to the fuel delivery driver and he told me that the "mogas" delivered to our airport was the same stuff he delivered to the local Phillips 66 gas station for autos. I did not ask about filtering etc but I will next time I see him. I would like to mention that for the last 400 hours or so, I have NEVER seen even the slightest sign of debris or water in the fuel test I do before flying. I did occasionally see some small debris in the early hours of the plane but I believe this came from the kreem coated fiberglass tanks of the kitfox, not from the fuel. There are many other mogas users at our airport and I have never heard of anyone having any contamination in their fuel. I understand that this situation is different from one where the pilot gets his fuel from the auto gas station, but it does at least provide some evidence that the fuel is clean when coming off the truck. Of course, your fuel distributor may not keep his tank trucks as clean. Regards, Cliff RV9A (N782PC) empennage, Erie, CO > > > Fellow Listers: > > In regards to the other posts on this subject I thought I would weigh > in. I pump about 1000 gals of 100LL each summer weekend, and felt that some > quality control issues were being overlooked with auto gas. Consider that > your average gas station could care less about water, however to maintain a > dealership we not only have to drain all sumps of water daily, but also > maintain a log of such. The average gas station has no such sumps on their > tanks. Just ask them to pay for your fuel dry when your gas line freezes > this winter to find out how much they care about water in their fuel. In > this light it sounds as if the water separating funnel is a novel idea. > The other problem with auto gas is foreign matter in the tank. Auto > fuel is not filtered from the semi, and probably only marginally at the > pump. Avgas is filtered as it comes off of the semi and goes into the tank, > and again when pumped into the truck, and a third time as it is placed in > the wing. Our filters are also changed every six months whether they need > it or not. Again we must chart quality control on the amount of sediment > that is present at the sumping of all tanks. YOU become that quality > control agent when using auto gas. A close knit cloth would probably catch > most if not all of the sediment that I have seen, however there again our > tanks are sumped daily. Just look at the bottom of your gas can to see the > problem. It only takes one bit of gunk to clog a carburetor jet. > I am not trying to sell avgas by any means, but am genuinely interested > in your engine maintaining an adequate supply of fuel to run on. Scrutinize > what you pour into your tanks....your life may depend on it. > > Just my .02 worth. > > Greg > RV-9A emp > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 10, 2000
From: earl fortner <e.fortner(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: 24v pitot heater
Guess I had a senior moment. I meant to say Ohm's Law Earl earl fortner wrote: > > > You are correct unless the democrats get hold ohm's and repeal it. > Earl RV4 > > Ed Anderson wrote: > > > > > > Well here goes my 0.02, hoping it has not been too many years. > > > > The pitot heating is accomplished by a resistive element placed in the > > pitot tube. The resistance stays essentially the same (actually there is > > probably some small change as the temperature increases) regardless of the > > voltage applied. Therefore if 12V is applied to a resistive element > > designed to produce X watts of power at 24 volts it will produce 1/4X watts > > at 12Volts. This is from the basic relationship of I=E/R or current > > Voltage/Resistance. So it follows that if the Voltage is halved from 24 to > > 12 volts and the resistance remains the same the current flow with 12 volts > > will also be 1/2 of the current with 24 volts.. Since one expression of > > electrical Power =E*I, then with 1/2 the voltage applied (i.e 12Volts vice > > 24 Volts) and 1/2 the current flowing due to the reduced voltage, the power > > will actually be 1/4 the value at 12Volts compared to 24Volts. > > You get the same results with the equivalent equation of Power = I 2*R > > > > Practical example. Assuming resistance of 10 ohms. Then at 24 Volts, I > > 24/10 or 2.4 amps. If you apply 12 volts, then I (current) =12/10 or 1.2 > > amps (1/2 the I value at 24 volts). So for power at 24 volts, P=I*E > > 24*2.4 > > 57.6 watts. At 12 Volts, P=12/1.2 = 14.4 Watts. 57.6/4 = 14.4 showing that > > the power at 12 volts is 1/4 that of the value generated with 24 volts. > > > > So, I think with that much less than the designed powered using 12 volts you > > face the serious risk that the pitot tube would not generate sufficient heat > > to keep the ice off (all depends on the environmental conditions of course) > > > > Ed Anderson > > > > then the power will > > > > > > > > > > > > > I know very little about electrical so here is the question....I have > > > > Bob's > > > > Book..... > > > > > > > > I just bought a new surplus Heated pitot tube, AN5812-1 "L" shaped. The > > > > catch is that it is 24 volts. I hooked it up to my 12 volt 15amp power > > > > supply to see what would happen. The results were 225 degrees were > > > > produced > > > > at the tip and it showed 3 amps of current. I left it on for about 10 > > > > minutes and it didn't blow the 5 amp CB I put in line. > > > > So the question is, Am I looking for trouble running this in a 12 volt > > > > system or will it only put out a lower amount of heat. It seems like the > > > > 225 > > > > degrees would be adequate for deicing. > > > > > > > > Thank You, > > > > Ed Perry > > > > RV8QB 180/CS Heated Pitot? > > > > > > > > Ed, > > > > If it really is a 24 volt unit, then at 12 volts it will draw about half > > > > the current, and since the voltage is half as well, it will consume > > > > about 1/4 the power. The formula is > > > > > > > > W = (Voltage squared) divided by Resistance > > > > > > > > where W is the power in watts. The resistance is fixed by the design. > > > > So you can see that at half the voltage, the power is one quarter. > > > > > > > > The temperature may be 225 degrees, but with the airflow at a very low > > > > temperature, you need a lot of power to melt the ice. So I think your > > > > 24V unit will not work for you at 12 volts. > > > > > > > > Gordon Robertson > > > > RV8 sb wings > > > > > > Listers, > > > I'm afraid that Gordon has this backwards. The total watts used is > > > constant. Therefore using half the voltage (12 versus 24) the amperage > > will > > > double to obtain the same wattage. George is correct that this 24 volt > > > heater will work with 12 volts. It simply uses twice the current. The only > > > advantage to the 24 volt system is that the supply and ground wires can be > > > of a smaller gauge (slightly lighter) wire. > > > Charlie Kuss > > > RV-8A finishing wings and starting fuselage > > > Boca Raton, Fl. > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Eustace Bowhay" <ebowhay(at)jetstream.net>
Subject: Re: RV6A or 9A
Date: Dec 10, 2000
Thanks to Van's invitation at the homecoming I had the opportunity to spent an hour or so with him in the 9A during a photo shoot for the 2001 calendar and here are some of my impressions. At the time I was not up to speed on the specs or performance figures for it so wasn't sure just what to expect. On getting seated on the right side the extra head room and great visibility over the cowl was really noticeable and gave the feeling of more room in the cockpit. Van asked if I would like to taxi it and do the take-off (you betcha), taxiing is so easy and with the large rudder brakes are only needed to do sharp turns. On the take-off roll I let it run a bit and I noticed Van looking over as much as to say "what are you waiting for" but was still off sooner than my RV 6. Once in the air surprises came one after another, the excellent rate of climb, a nice feel to the controls that are not as sensitive as my 6 but give you a comfortable relaxed feeling. I was impressed with Vans engine handling as he was the first one to reach to reduce from take-off power. The next surprise was the lack of vibration, there was practically none so much so I was tempted to see if I could stand a coin on edge on the visor over the instrument panel. This may be a bit of an exaggeration but I have never been in a piston powered aircraft that ran this smooth. Have no real answer for this but it has to be either the engine or propeller or a combination of both. It is equipped with 160 HP 0320 turning a MT composite CS three blade prop. Next Van had a chance to demonstrate some of it's flight characteristics while we waited for the photo aircraft and other RV's to form up. The stall speed is as advertised at 44 MPH in straight and level with no tendency to roll. You can enter the stall with the ball centered then continue to hold the stick all the way back, as it stalls the nose drops then comes back up again and drops again. Will continue this as long as the stick is held all the way back. I don't recall the lost height in a stall with immediate recovery but it was minimal. Now it was time to join up with the photo aircraft with Van demonstrating his formation ability in a half hour of intense formation flying for the photos which I am sure we will see in the new calendar. Then it was back to the Aurora airport and a chance to do a couple of more circuits. Now I could see why Van was looking over at me on the first take-off as getting a bit more aggressive we were airborne by the time the throttle was wide open. In it's category this is truly a remarkable aircraft with a stall speed getting close to some of the early ones such as the Aeronca and Piper J3 coupled with a cruise of 160 plus at 65-70%. As Jerry Springer has mentioned this stall speed means a slower landing speed which in the event of a forced landing could make the difference. All in all it seems to be a much less demanding aircraft to fly, this along with being pre-punched it seems to me it is by far the best choice for a first time builder and especially if the builder is a low time pilot, The only thing you are giving up is aerobatics. Looking forward to flying it again. Eustace Bowhay Blind Bay, B.C. Cutting canopy on the 6A -----Original Message----- From: tdale4 <tdale4(at)email.msn.com> Date: Sunday, December 10, 2000 6:32 AM Subject: RV-List: RV6A or 9A > >Can anyone tell me the main differences between the RV6A and the RV9A? I've >looked at Van's homepage but the both look so similar. I guess the 9A is >better if you don't plan on doing aerobatics????? It seems easier to build, >almost as fast with a smaller engine, and a little larger inside. Any >opinions would be greatly appreciated. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Shook" <billshook(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: RV6A or 9A
Date: Dec 10, 2000
> The only thing you are giving up is aerobatics. Only????? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JDaniel343(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 10, 2000
Subject: Re: Electric Prime
A large Adel clamp will work fine. John Danielson Engine installation and finishing kit ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mister Murphy" <mister_murphy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Mogas and Avgas info (Very Long)
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Listers, I've been lurking for sometime but feel that I may need to give some insight here. This is a long email, so if you don't want it delete it. I'm just trying to answer other peoples questions. Since I work for a small oil company in North Carolina, let me try to answer some of the peoples questions about the different items below. Also the 150's and 172's that I've flown and have been around are STC'd for mogas. So I have atad of experiece as a pilot here too. Snip >I did not ask about filtering etc but I will next time I see him. >I understand that this situation is different from one where the pilot gets >his fuel from the auto gas station, but it does at least provide some >evidence that the fuel is clean when coming off the truck. >Of course, your fuel distributor may not keep his tank trucks as clean. >Regards, >Cliff Snip Loading: Upon arrival at terminal, driver connects bonding cable, vapor recovery, then the driver takes a drain hose to each compartment to drain any residue from the preceding load. After draining the residue (some drivers/companies do not do this which may leave some residue in the tank), the driver "cards in" (identifies himself to the computer), then attaches the loading arms to the trailer which is bottom loaded. Then he just plugs in the gallons of each product he wants, and then he waits. After loading he disconnects everything in reverse order, then he goes is bill or lading and goes to his destination. Keep in mind everyone that when the gas comes up the pipeline it is sent up in the thousands of gallons, between the gas and the next product is a set amount of water, YES WATER. The water is there to show that one pruduct has ended, and another product will be behind the X gallons of water. Also, one terminal may have different brands. This is because of using a base stock, and when a truck wants shell for instance, he puts a shell product code in the computer that gives him the base plus the additives for shell. Some terminals filter the product that goes into their tanks, and most all have a filter filter(its actuallly more than a screen) before the meter. Unloading: Upon arrival and parking, the driver then identifies the tanks he will unload into (product, how many gallons is already in the tank). Then the driver connects his vapor recovery, then his "drop" or unloading hose to the tank, then the tanker and unloads. After unloading it is just the reverse. Most tankers do not have filters or screens, unless they have a pump on the truck. The retail location (gas station) Most locations have underground tanks, with a (ussually, not always)submerged pump similer to a regular well pump. The pump is generally 6-18 inches from the bottom of the tank to allow for trash and sediment to settle to the bottom and not be a problem. Also, the submerged pumps have a screen that keeps out larger sediment. At the curb is usually a dispenser, not a pump, that has two filters, the first is a water trap filter that catches any water that may be in the gas, next is a particle filter, similar to an oil filter, that filters out any small particles. Also, about 95% of the retail locations have a computerized read out system that not only measures the level of gas, but the temp, as well as the water level. YES I SAID WATER LEVEL. With a large tank, 2000 gal + it is impossible to keep 100% of the water out due to many factors. Condensation, the fact that on occasion the truck may recive a large amount of water in the gas it loaded at the terminal, etc. Avgas I have very limited experience with Avgas, but this is how what I know about avgas. Avgas can not usually be sent by pipe line because it is leaded and will contaminate the products that may follow it. The only avgas that is loaded from the terminals that I'm familier with (greensboro north carolina) is brought in by train, then pumped into a storage tank. For a tanker to be loaded with avgas, the prior load must have been avgas, or generally it is required to be cleaned. Loading is similar to mogas, except that they may have a different filter. Read different not neccesarily better. Unloading is similar, with the exception that I have seen a filter in the what is called the riser 9the pipe that comes from the underground tank to the top of the ground that the tankers hose attaches too). Due to the many differences at FBOs I want attempt to describe what goes on after arrival. Things to consider: use commen sense. Who are you buying from? Brands aside, you can get great gas from an independant store, and bad gas from a brand and vice versa. Have you had problems there before? If so, you may want to find somewhere else, but keep in mind that even with the best percations to keep water and trash out of the gas something may happen. It's murphy's law, as well as simple statistics Also, some companies will not sell mogas for use in aircraft because they do not want the liability on them. There may be additional taxes on mogas in your area, such as highway use tax. If you can prove you use it "off highway" to the tax guys, they may refund it. Just off the top of my head in NC I believe the tax is 0.4175 per gallon but don't hold me to it. If you have questions about a station or FBOs product, make a point to ask them about it. There are different procedures and rules/laws from place to place, company to company, station to station, FBO to FBO. So beware. Erik North Carolina, RV-6 finishing fiberglass on empenage ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 10, 2000
From: Ed Hobenshield <edhob(at)kermode.net>
Subject: Re: RV6A or 9A
> >In it's category this is truly a remarkable aircraft with a stall speed >getting close to some of the early ones such as the Aeronca and Piper J3 >coupled with a cruise of 160 plus at 65-70%. As Jerry Springer has mentioned >this stall speed means a slower landing speed which in the event of a forced >landing could make the difference. > >All in all it seems to be a much less demanding aircraft to fly, this along >with being pre-punched it seems to me it is by far the best choice for a >first time builder and especially if the builder is a low time pilot, The >only thing you are giving up is aerobatics. > >Looking forward to flying it again. > >Eustace Bowhay Gee ! I simply must get the new shop built soon !! This sounds like a made in Heaven for me. Ed H. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 10, 2000
From: Ed Hobenshield <edhob(at)kermode.net>
Subject: Re: canadian rv4
> >I looked it up recently and I recall it went for $43,399 so some such >number. Was that $ US ? I missed the bid as of a funeral. Maybe a blessing. 43 thou USA would be some 65 $ Can. I think? God I'm poor! Ed H. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JDaniel343(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 10, 2000
Subject: Re: Routing Mixture Cable
I tried right of the battery box, but cables Vans sell seem a little short. So I went just below battery box on right hand corner. John Danielson ________________________________________________________________________________
From: clayfly(at)libertybay.com
Subject: mister_murphy(at)hotmail.com
Date: Dec 10, 2000
Erik, Thanks for the info on gas. Where in N.C. do you live? I'm planning to move to a little town in the far western part of N.C --- (Murphy, N.C.) sometime next summer. How far are you from that neck of the woods? Clay Smith, RV-4, N9X, 50+ hours Indiana > ** Original Subject: RV-List: Mogas and Avgas info (Very Long) > ** Original Sender: "Mister Murphy" > ** Original Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 18:13:24 -0800 > ** Original Message follows... > > > > Listers, > > I've been lurking for sometime but feel that I may need to give some insight > here. This is a long email, so if you don't want it delete it. I'm just > trying to answer other peoples questions. Since I work for a small oil > company in North Carolina, let me try to answer some of the peoples > questions about the different items below. Also the 150's and 172's that > I've flown and have been around are STC'd for mogas. So I have atad of > experiece as a pilot here too. > > Snip > >I did not ask about filtering etc but I will next time I see him. > >I understand that this situation is different from one where the pilot gets > >his fuel from the auto gas station, but it does at least provide some > >evidence that the fuel is clean when coming off the truck. > >Of course, your fuel distributor may not keep his tank trucks as clean. > >Regards, > >Cliff > Snip > > Loading: > > Upon arrival at terminal, driver connects bonding cable, vapor recovery, > then the driver takes a drain hose to each compartment to drain any residue > from the preceding load. After draining the residue (some drivers/companies > do not do this which may leave some residue in the tank), the driver "cards > in" (identifies himself to the computer), then attaches the loading arms to > the trailer which is bottom loaded. Then he just plugs in the gallons of > each product he wants, and then he waits. After loading he disconnects > everything in reverse order, then he goes is bill or lading and goes to his > destination. Keep in mind everyone that when the gas comes up the pipeline > it is sent up in the thousands of gallons, between the gas and the next > product is a set amount of water, YES WATER. The water is there to show that > one pruduct has ended, and another product will be behind the X gallons of > water. Also, one terminal may have different brands. This is because of > using a base stock, and when a truck wants shell for instance, he puts a > shell product code in the computer that gives him the base plus the > additives for shell. Some terminals filter the product that goes into their > tanks, and most all have a filter filter(its actuallly more than a screen) > before the meter. > > Unloading: > > Upon arrival and parking, the driver then identifies the tanks he will > unload into (product, how many gallons is already in the tank). Then the > driver connects his vapor recovery, then his "drop" or unloading hose to the > tank, then the tanker and unloads. After unloading it is just the reverse. > Most tankers do not have filters or screens, unless they have a pump on the > truck. > > The retail location (gas station) > > Most locations have underground tanks, with a (ussually, not > always)submerged pump similer to a regular well pump. The pump is generally > 6-18 inches from the bottom of the tank to allow for trash and sediment to > settle to the bottom and not be a problem. Also, the submerged pumps have a > screen that keeps out larger sediment. At the curb is usually a dispenser, > not a pump, that has two filters, the first is a water trap filter that > catches any water that may be in the gas, next is a particle filter, similar > to an oil filter, that filters out any small particles. Also, about 95% of > the retail locations have a computerized read out system that not only > measures the level of gas, but the temp, as well as the water level. YES I > SAID WATER LEVEL. With a large tank, 2000 gal + it is impossible to keep > 100% of the water out due to many factors. Condensation, the fact that on > occasion the truck may recive a large amount of water in the gas it loaded > at the terminal, etc. > > Avgas > > I have very limited experience with Avgas, but this is how what I know about > avgas. Avgas can not usually be sent by pipe line because it is leaded and > will contaminate the products that may follow it. The only avgas that is > loaded from the terminals that I'm familier with (greensboro north carolina) > is brought in by train, then pumped into a storage tank. For a tanker to be > loaded with avgas, the prior load must have been avgas, or generally it is > required to be cleaned. Loading is similar to mogas, except that they may > have a different filter. Read different not neccesarily better. Unloading is > similar, with the exception that I have seen a filter in the what is called > the riser 9the pipe that comes from the underground tank to the top of the > ground that the tankers hose attaches too). Due to the many differences at > FBOs I want attempt to describe what goes on after arrival. > > Things to consider: > > use commen sense. > > Who are you buying from? Brands aside, you can get great gas from an > independant store, and bad gas from a brand and vice versa. > > Have you had problems there before? If so, you may want to find somewhere > else, but keep in mind that even with the best percations to keep water and > trash out of the gas something may happen. It's murphy's law, as well as > simple statistics > > Also, some companies will not sell mogas for use in aircraft because they do > not want the liability on them. > > There may be additional taxes on mogas in your area, such as highway use > tax. If you can prove you use it "off highway" to the tax guys, they may > refund it. Just off the top of my head in NC I believe the tax is 0.4175 per > gallon but don't hold me to it. > > If you have questions about a station or FBOs product, make a point to ask > them about it. > > There are different procedures and rules/laws from place to place, company > to company, station to station, FBO to FBO. So beware. > > > Erik > North Carolina, > RV-6 finishing fiberglass on empenage > > > > > >** --------- End Original Message ----------- ** > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mister Murphy" <mister_murphy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: mister_murphy(at)hotmail.com
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Clay I live in Mt Airy North Carolina, which is in the north western part of NC at the Va line....What part of Indiana are you in? I've got to go to Cincinnati in a couple of weeks, and I've never seen a -4 in person.. Erik RV-6 empanage North Carolina ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Shook" <billshook(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Going to Denver
Date: Dec 10, 2000
From the 23rd to the 31st I will be in Denver visiting my sister. I intend to spend 3 of those days in Winter Park snowboarding, but I'm sure the rest of them will be spent looking for something to do. I'd love to see any projects, or aircraft in the area whose owners don't mind. Bill -4 wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Hurlbut" <shurlbut(at)island.net>
Subject: Re: canadian rv4
Date: Dec 10, 2000
No that is Canadian dollars. About $28000 USD. Not a bad deal but the engine had no logs and the aircraft was sold as is where is. Steve Hurlbut Comox, BC shurlbut(at)island.net ----- Original Message ----- From: Ed Hobenshield <edhob(at)kermode.net> Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 4:58 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: canadian rv4 > > > > >I looked it up recently and I recall it went for $43,399 so some such > >number. > > Was that $ US ? > > I missed the bid as of a funeral. Maybe a blessing. 43 thou USA > would be some 65 $ Can. I think? > > God I'm poor! > > Ed H. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randall Henderson" <randallh(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: cabin floor
Date: Dec 10, 2000
> For those who have installed a cabin floor which would raise your heels > toward rudder & brake pedals--does that require adjusting the height of > the pedals? Also is anyone using the curved pipe extensions? I did put in a "raised" floor (foam between the stiffeners and .032 over the top), and I did raise the rudder pedals, by about an inch. However if I didn't have such big feet I migh'tve left them in the normal place. I also moved them forward about 3/4" which is more comfortable for me. Basically I spent some time custom fitting the pedals to fit ME. Even if I hadn't put in the raised floor I still would've custom fit it as necessary to fit my build. It's ME I built the plane for, after all! :-) As for the curved pipe extensions -- I'm using them but only because I had some fitting problems with the pipes -- in order to make them clear both the cowl and the bottom of the firewall I had to rotate them a bit, but a side effect of this is that the turndowns were "pigeon-toed". At the same time Larry told me about his new, shallower turndown extensions, so I cut my turndowns off and replaced them with the extensions, oriented the proper direction. The turndowns aren't as sharp as the originals were, so there's less drag (pipe out in the wind) and a little more thrust, in theory anyway. Can't say what it did for the noise/vibration -- probably not much different there. If I remember correctly, Larry said he's going with the shallower turndowns standard in current systems. Mine are still clamped on with hose clamps but I'll get them welded one of these days. Randall Henderson, RV-6 N6R (~175 hrs) Portland, OR http://www.edt.com/homewing ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gardner, Douglas (GA01)" <douglas.gardner(at)honeywell.com>
Subject: Infinity Grips/Facet fuel pump
Date: Dec 11, 2000
-----Original Message----- From: meketa [mailto:acgm(at)gvtc.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 12:50 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: Infinity Grips/Facet fuel pump Douglas You mention that the breaker pops when you turn on the master. Is the fuel pump switch on at this time. If not the problem is at\or before the switch. Unplug or cut the input wire for the fuel pump to the stick grip harness. If the problem goes away it is in the stick or grip. If the breaker still pops there is a probable short or misswire between the breaker and cut\disconnect. If it only pops when the fuel pump switch is on the problem is at or after the switch. Unplug the pump or the output from the stick (start at the easiest place to access) and try to isolate the problem. Having a 8 amp switch is most likely not the problem. I would suspect a wiring problem. We would need more info to help. Is this a new problem, are you just now smoke testing the system or have you been flying, is the fuel pump switch off\on , how is the circuit designed, etc. I am installing Infinity grips on my 8 project and plan on installing a relay in the circuit. I did not like the small gauge wire and small switch to control the fuel pump current. What have other Infinity users done?? George Meketa RV8- moving project to the airport tomorrow Gardner, Douglas (GA01) wrote: > > > I'm tripping the 5 amp CB fuel boost pump when switching on the master > switch. The Van's wiring > kit shows a 5 amp CB for the boost pump, and the Infinity grip's switch is > rated at 8 amps. > > I have also wired in a red led in my panel to indicate the boost pump's on > state. > > I can't figure this one out. Any ideas ?? > > Thanks, > > Doug Gardner -8A FWF #80717 > 0-360/CS palm Harbor Fla > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 11, 2000
From: Fred Kunkel <rvator(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Stocking Stuffers
Hello Everyone, Our web site is taking a little more time than originally thought, so with apologies to Matt for using his bandwidth, we're offering the following stocking stuffers through Dec. 20th. All the drill bits are first tier, NAS 907 135 degree split point, production quality bits manufactured in the U.S. Jobbers Length HSS #40 - $7.50/Dz. #30 - $7.50/Dz. #21 - $10.00/Dz. Jobbers Length M42 Cobalt #40 - $10.00/Dz. #30 - $10.00/Dz. #21 - $15.00/Dz. 1/4 - $4.00/2 6" HSS #40 - $9.00/6 #30 - $10.00/6 #21 - $10.00/6 12" HSS #40 - $12.00/6 #30 - $12.00/6 #10 - $12.00/4 1/4 - $12.00/4 HSS Threaded Drill Bits (Assorted Lengths) #40 - $22.00/Dz. #30 - $22.00/Dz. Squeezer Yokes (NEW) 1.5" Std. Yoke - $70.00 2.5" Std. Yoke - $95.00 2.5" Thin Nose Yoke - $105.00 3" Std. Yoke - $105.00 Longeron Yoke - $115.00 Again, with apologies to Matt, if we can help you pls. contact us off-list. Add $4.00 for shipping & handling by Priority Mail. Blue Skies! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Douglas G. Murray" <dgmurray(at)telusplanet.net>
Subject: Re: Electric Prime
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Listers - I did something different on my electric primer that I haven't seen before. I installed two 10 - 32 machine screws through a bracket and into the bottom of the primer solinoid. It looks like an easy installation and very clean but I have been wondering why no one else mentions this method. Douglas G. Murray RV-6 C-GRPA Southern Alberta Priming & painting ----- Original Message ----- From: <JDaniel343(at)AOL.COM> Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 5:24 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Electric Prime > > A large Adel clamp will work fine. > > John Danielson > Engine installation and finishing kit > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Charles Rowbotham" <crowbotham(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: N286RV flies!!
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Carey, CONGRATULATIONS & WELL DONE !!! Chuck & Dave Rowbotham RV-8A (Painting soon) Niantic, CT ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV8DRIVER(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Subject: Re: HVLP Spray Gunds from Harbor Freight
Lucky, the Harbor Frieght HVLP gun you mention sounds like the one I have. The body of the gun is green in color. HF changes their partnumbers with every catalog, so the number is not much help. The gun is fine for priming work, just keep it cleaned out with MEK if your're using epoxy primers. Wear a good respirator and heavy neoprene gloves while cleaning, MEK is dangerous stuff. Andy Johnson, Drilling fuse skins ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Stocking Stuffers
From: pcondon(at)csc.com
Date: Dec 11, 2000
12/11/2000 10:12:40 Dremmel came out with a 90 degree drive attachment.......fantastic X=mas stocking stuffer. About 24 dollars. Also Dremmel has a 2 foot flex drive attachment (was last years stocking stuffer) . Ethically, I must confess that I razored the Dremmel box open and snuck the 90 degree attachment out of the wrapped Christmas present. I needed it at the hanger...I felt like the Grinch for about 3 minutes...... ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wing lights
From: pcondon(at)csc.com
Date: Dec 11, 2000
12/11/2000 10:35:53 A real UNIBIT to cut your entry holes and a dremmel is all that is needed. Nibblers are nice but we did many RV's with this approach, fast, cheap ant you are off to the next task..... Gordon Robertson (at)matronics.com on 12/10/2000 01:07:07 AM Please respond to rv-list(at)matronics.com Sent by: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com cc: Subject: RV-List: Wing lights From: "Cliff Begnaud" <Shoeless(at)barefootpilot.com> Subject: RV-List: Nibbler I'm planning for the leading edge wing light in my -9. A hole has to be cut in the wing leading edge and I'm assuming that this is done with a nibbler. I would greatly appreciate hearing from someone who has done this. Exactly which tool should I purchase for this job? Thanks, Cliff RV9A (N782PC -reserved) Empennage, wing arrives near christmas Cliff -- I used a 2" cut-off disk in a die grinder. Worked great, but be careful. It is very aggressive. ps. The die grinder is one of the most useful tools I own. And it was only $20. Gordon Robertson RV8 sb wings ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 11, 2000
From: "Douglas E. Bostard" <dougacft(at)jps.net>
Subject: Re: RV6-List Digest: 3 Msgs - 12/10/00
Gossip/and fact: I believe it's intended more as a trainer, fatter airfoil, more forgiving lift/stall, etc. Has to be slower-especially powered as the prototype. Van will tell you if you call. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Subject: Re: carb nuts?
From: Don Jordan <dons6a(at)juno.com>
Steel with a locking washer. Don Jordan RV6A Arlington, Tx ***************************************** writes: > > what kind of nuts are used to install carb to 0-360? elastic stop > nuts > or steel stop nuts? > thanks: > Doyal > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Countersinking perection
From: pcondon(at)csc.com
Date: Dec 11, 2000
12/11/2000 10:49:01 Try dressing the C/S holes with a stone. I got a whole mess of cheap stones for the drill of various sizes at the auto parts store. One of the cheap round (ball) sized stones are perfect for this kind of dressing. BTW the conical stones are great for dressing up, or doing from scratch the fiberglass C/S holes all over my RV. "Are Barstad" (at)matronics.com on 12/09/2000 09:08:34 AM Please respond to rv-list(at)matronics.com Sent by: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com cc: Subject: RV-List: Countersinking perection I just discovered that all the holes I countersunk on the wingspar for the fuel tank attachment are somewhat oblong. Not alot, but oblong. It turns out that my countersink cage is not perfectly straight. It's so little that it's very hard to see, but I think this is the only way the holes can get enlarged in one direction. Anyone else exeperienced this? Hopefully, it will still be ok for strength. I tried another cage, another coutersink and another drill. It seems it's impossible to get it perfectly straight so the little 'nipple' on the countersink stays fixed in one spot. Am I to critical? Are RV-8 Wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Bower" <rvbuilder(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Wing lights
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Gordon, I just installed my landing light over the weekend, so I have just "been there". I am assuming you mean the Duckworks landing light kit? I used the template per instructions to draw the cutout line on the leading edge. Then, I taped all around the hole with masking tape. Taking the advice of most folks, I used a cut-off wheel in a Dremel tool to actually make the cutout. I cut up to about 1/4" away from the cut line, then I used a hand nibbler to get closer to the edge. Once I was about 1/16" away, I finished it off with a combination of flat and half-round files. A little emery cloth to smooth the edges, and you're done! Very easy. I also learned something: If you read the Duckworks instructions, they are very emphatic about you using the "strapping tape" method for drilling the lens. This does work very well, but I had my helper pulling so hard on the lens that it was hard to get the holes in the lens to line up with the holes in the skin for final installation. So, don't pull too hard! Good luck, and I hope this helps. Jim Bower St. Louis, MO RV-6A Wings >From: Gordon Robertson <gordon(at)safemail.com> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV-List: Wing lights >Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 22:07:07 -0800 > > >From: "Cliff Begnaud" <Shoeless(at)barefootpilot.com> >Subject: RV-List: Nibbler > > > >I'm planning for the leading edge wing light in my -9. A hole has to be >cut >in the wing leading edge and I'm assuming that this is done with a >nibbler. >I would greatly appreciate hearing from someone who has done this. >Exactly >which tool should I purchase for this job? >Thanks, >Cliff >RV9A (N782PC -reserved) >Empennage, wing arrives near christmas > >Cliff -- > >I used a 2" cut-off disk in a die grinder. Worked great, but be >careful. It is very aggressive. > >ps. The die grinder is one of the most useful tools I own. And it was >only $20. > >Gordon Robertson > >RV8 sb wings > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Zeidman, Richard B" <Richard.Zeidman(at)PHL.Boeing.com>
Subject: Lycoming starting without prime
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Listers, I am trying to find out how difficult a carburated Lycoming is to start in cold weather without a primer. . At the present time my plane doesent have one and I will be starting it for the first time in a few weeks. Pumping the throttle while cranking is my plan. I figure I can add one later if needed. Rich Zeidman RV6A N42RZ Almost done ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Van Artsdalen, Scott" <svanarts(at)unionsafe.com>
Subject: ACK vs. Ameri-King ELT
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Was that bought through Vans? Has anyone told Van's about the tremendously bad problems you've had with the Ameri-King. I sure wish I had know about these problems before I bought my Ameri-King blind encoder from Van's. -- Scott VanArtsdalen, MCSE, CCNA Network Administrator Union Safe Deposit Bank 209-946-5116 -----Original Message----- From: Bill Ervin [mailto:bjervin(at)home.com] Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 8:36 PM To: rv-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Re: RV-List: ACK vs. Ameri-King ELT Don't know about their ELTs, but I had nothing but problems with Amri-King's Encoder, I sent it back 4 times and continued to get the same problem and the same excuse (it must be something you or your tech are doing). And the person I talked to couldn't even speak good english. I'm not impressed. Bill RV-6 Fuse Doug Weiler wrote: > > > > > > I'm getting ready to order an ELT from Van's. I like the weight savings of > > the ACK E-01 compared to the Ameri-King AK-450 (about a pound?) but it > > costs $30 more. Are there any other features besides weight and price that > I > > should consider? > > I purchased the ACK for both my Citabria and RV. I had heard comments about > poor customer service from Ameri-King. I don't know how true those comments > were, but I am happy with the quality and simplicity of the ACK unit. > > Doug Weiler > Mn Wing > > ================ > Doug Weiler > Hudson, WI > 715-386-1239 > dougweil(at)pressenter.com > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Persyk" <dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Lycoming starting without prime
Date: Dec 11, 2000
-----Original Message----- From: Zeidman, Richard B <Richard.Zeidman(at)PHL.Boeing.com> Date: Monday, December 11, 2000 10:29 AM Subject: RV-List: Lycoming starting without prime > >Listers, >I am trying to find out how difficult a carburated Lycoming is to start in >cold weather without a primer. . At the present time my plane doesent have >one and I will be starting it for the first time in a few weeks. Pumping >the throttle while cranking is my plan. >I figure I can add one later if needed. >Rich Zeidman >RV6A N42RZ >Almost done > It would be helpful if you would quantify cold. Below 20 degrees Cessna recommends preheat, and that is generally good practice. The problem is firstly fuel transport and secondly fuel volatilization. The transport problem is that the accelerator pump is squirting a solid stream of cold gas into the carb throat. The theory is that when cranking, the air flow is through the carb, thorough the induction pipes, past the open inlet valve, and thence into the combustion chamber. Its pretty hard for the liquid fuel to wend its way along that passage and find its way into the combustion chamber. Most of the fuel falls to the bottom of the air box and hopefully flows out that 3/16 hole you drilled there. Unlike auto gas which is formulated to volatilize (go from liquid to gas phase) in cold weather, av gas does not volatilize readily in the cold. Hence the unprimed engine is trying to suck globs of liquid drops in while starting. It usually starts, but this is not the preferred way. Cold starts can result in engine fires if the engine backfires. The primed engine, on the other hand, has (ideally) atomization nozzles in the cylinder head. You buy these from A/S or Wicks. (See my post in the archives for a detailed description of the parts needed for a priming system.) Now the gas is atomized into tiny droplets, much like a fine perfume bottle sprayer, and go directly into the combustion chamber. The engine starts much more easily and can actually run on the priming system while starting (or during an emergency). You will doubless hear some replies of "I never need a primer" and "work's well without a primer". I suggest that these folks a) don't start their engines often when they have been cold soaked at well below 20 F, and b) have neither experienced nor witnessed an engine fire resulting from an attempted cold start. Dennis Persyk 6A N600DP O360A1A/Hartzell 4-cylinder prime 25 hours Hampshire, IL C38 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Terry Burch" <rv6man(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Aileron bellcrank
Date: Dec 11, 2000
----- Original Message ----- From: "Are Barstad" <abarstad(at)bconnex.net> Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 10:46 AM Subject: RV-List: Aileron bellcrank It > just seems strange not to use washers under the bolt head. > Washers are never used under the head of an bolt except when the bolt is long and needs shimming .Terry ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Terry Burch" <rv6man(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Lycoming starting without prime
Date: Dec 11, 2000
----- Original Message ----- From: "Zeidman, Richard B" <Richard.Zeidman(at)PHL.Boeing.com> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:23 AM Subject: RV-List: Lycoming starting without prime > > Listers, > I am trying to find out how difficult a carburated Lycoming is to start in > cold weather without a primer. . At the present time my plane doesent have > one and I will be starting it for the first time in a few weeks. Pumping > the throttle while cranking is my plan. > I figure I can add one later if needed. > Rich Zeidman > RV6A N42RZ > Almost done > > Correct plan.Terry > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Terry Burch" <rv6man(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: RV6A or 9A
Date: Dec 11, 2000
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Springer" <jsflyrv(at)teleport.com> Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 12:04 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: RV6A or 9A This wing well allow the 9A to fly slower which means that > you can also land at a slower speed. > > Jerry > > My RV6 with VG's stalls at 44 mph. I can go anywhere an RV9 can go and I can get there upside down.Terry > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RVPilot4(at)webtv.net (BOBE.)
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Subject: Re: Lycoming starting without prime
I disconnected my prime system.After 5 years I used it twice and did not need it then.Push the throttle twice and it works the accellerator pump and it starts.This may not be right for everyone and I can always reconnect.My RV4 sits in an insulated hanger in Poplar Grove Il.If it was parked outside I would have a primer ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Nellis" <mnellis(at)emailusa.net>
Subject: Re: Lycoming starting without prime
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Be careful on this one. Using the accelerator pump (pumping the throttle) on a carb mounted to the bottom of an engine can be risky. While the accelerator pump will get some of the gas into the cylinders it also drips some out of the carb and into the air cleaner/carb area. If the engine backfires (not unusual) you could have a fire to deal with. Priming injects the fuel directly into the cylinders so backfires will be much less likely to cause a fire. Been there Done that on a Warrior. Mike Nellis - RV-6 N699BM (res) Plainfield, IL Skinning the Wings http://mnellis.jnet.net/rv-6_page > > Listers, > I am trying to find out how difficult a carburated Lycoming is to start in > cold weather without a primer. . At the present time my plane doesent have > one and I will be starting it for the first time in a few weeks. Pumping > the throttle while cranking is my plan. > I figure I can add one later if needed. > Rich Zeidman > RV6A N42RZ > Almost done > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rick Jory" <rickjory(at)email.msn.com>
Subject: Re: Wing lights
Date: Dec 11, 2000
. Taking the advice of > most folks, I used a cut-off wheel in a Dremel tool to actually make the > cutout. I cut up to about 1/4" away from the cut line, then I used a hand > nibbler to get closer to the edge. Once I was about 1/16" away, I finished > it off with a combination of flat and half-round files. A little emery > cloth to smooth the edges, and you're done! You'll get super results if you use a 1" or 2" scotchbrite wheel on your die grinder to take the rough-cut edge down to the line. The cut-out comes out super clean/smooth. Rick Jory ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 11, 2000
From: MLSRV6(at)AOL.COM
Subject: Re: RV6-List Digest: 3 Msgs - 12/10/00
THE RV9 IS A LITTLE WIDER THAN THE 6. THE 9 HAS A NEW TYPE WING THAT IS ABOUT 5 FOOT LONGER THAN HTE 6. THE STALL SPEED ON THE 9 IS LOWER THAN THE 6. THE 9 IS MORE A TRAINER . ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Unibit extender
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Folks, Where can I buy one of these magical beasts? Or, almost as good...How can I make one of these magical beasts? Or, third in line...does anyone have one of these magical beasts that they're willing to loan? Ralph Capen RV6AQB Richardson, TX N822AR - reserved ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: RV8 Elec ail trim
Date: Dec 11, 2000
For those of you -8 guys that have elec ail trim... How much throw does the rotational effect of the springs actuated by the trim servo actually produce? It doesn't look like it would be that much but I gotta ask. I'm putting an 8 elec ail trim kit into the left wing of my 6QB since it's ailerons already closed (QB style). What I'm trying to determine is the amount of throw at the bellcrank that needs to be replicated in my installation in order to produce the same trim capabilities. Thanks, Ralph Capen RV6AQB Richardson, TX N822AR reserved ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson(at)carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: RV6A or 9A
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Terry, did you ever figure out how much (if any) the VGs knocked off of your top/cruise speed. I presume there was some loss, but gaining a stall speed of 44 mph would be worth it in my opinion if it were not an excessive lost of cruise speed. Ed Anderson > Subject: Re: RV-List: RV6A or 9A > > > This wing well allow the 9A to fly slower which means that > > you can also land at a slower speed. > > > > Jerry > > > > My RV6 with VG's stalls at 44 mph. I can go anywhere an RV9 can go > and I can get there upside down.Terry > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: Lycoming starting without prime
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Although it might look like the primer is being injected into the cylinder, I believe it is injected on the stem side of the valve and over priming could also drip back out the carb. Cy Galley - Editor, B-C Contact! (Click here to visit our Club site at http://www.bellanca-championclub.com) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Nellis" <mnellis(at)emailusa.net> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 10:40 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: Lycoming starting without prime > > Be careful on this one. Using the accelerator pump (pumping the throttle) > on a carb mounted to the bottom of an engine can be risky. While the > accelerator pump will get some of the gas into the cylinders it also drips > some out of the carb and into the air cleaner/carb area. If the engine > backfires (not unusual) you could have a fire to deal with. Priming injects > the fuel directly into the cylinders so backfires will be much less likely > to cause a fire. Been there Done that on a Warrior. > > Mike Nellis - RV-6 N699BM (res) > Plainfield, IL > Skinning the Wings > http://mnellis.jnet.net/rv-6_page > > > > > > Listers, > > I am trying to find out how difficult a carburated Lycoming is to start in > > cold weather without a primer. . At the present time my plane doesent have > > one and I will be starting it for the first time in a few weeks. Pumping > > the throttle while cranking is my plan. > > I figure I can add one later if needed. > > Rich Zeidman > > RV6A N42RZ > > Almost done > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 11, 2000
From: The Razers <razer(at)midwest.net>
Subject: Re: Lycoming starting without prime
The answer is: the carburated Lyc starts harder in cold wx. If its below 35 degrees F and I don't preheat my 0360 is hard to start, and puts a load on the starter and battery. It does however finally start. I preheat if the temp drops below 40 degrees F and have no problems starting. I don't have a primer system but am thinking about installing one. Chet "Zeidman, Richard B" wrote: > > > Listers, > I am trying to find out how difficult a carburated Lycoming is to start in > cold weather without a primer. . At the present time my plane doesent have > one and I will be starting it for the first time in a few weeks. Pumping > the throttle while cranking is my plan. > I figure I can add one later if needed. > Rich Zeidman > RV6A N42RZ > Almost done > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RVPilot4(at)webtv.net (BOBE.)
Date: Dec 11, 2000
jellis(at)cswnet.com, Jonesr2(at)osc.army.mil, RICKRV6(at)AOL.COM, Ognir(at)pacbell.net, WIRE4(at)AOL.COM
Subject: Re: ACK vs. Ameri-King ELT
After reading all the problems users are having with Ameri-King I don't think I want to do buisness with them until they have a complete change of attitude toward the people who use their products.Maybe they have forgotten these are customers,you know (customers) the ones with the money ________________________________________________________________________________
From: OrndorffG(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Subject: Re: Unibit extender
We sell unibit extenders for $12.00 plus shipping. Give us a call if we can help you. 940-648-0841. George and Becki Orndorff ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jim jewell" <jjewell(at)okanagan.net>
Subject: Re: cabin floor
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Hello Randall, I just recently spent a few days putting in floors in the footwell area of my 6-A. Mike Nellis has put some photos and drawings of my effort on his web site <http://mnellis.jnet.net/RV-6_Page/index.htm> Is this the kind of idea that you have done with your floors? I will be bonding some Sound / heat insulation to the bottoms of the floor sheets later. Jim in Kelowna --- Original Message ----- From: Randall Henderson <randallh(at)home.com> Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 11:43 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: cabin floor > > > For those who have installed a cabin floor which would raise your heels > > toward rudder & brake pedals--does that require adjusting the height of > > the pedals? Also is anyone using the curved pipe extensions? > > I did put in a "raised" floor (foam between the stiffeners and .032 over the > top), and I did raise the rudder pedals, by about an inch. However if I > didn't have such big feet I migh'tve left them in the normal place. I also > moved them forward about 3/4" which is more comfortable for me. Basically I > spent some time custom fitting the pedals to fit ME. Even if I hadn't put in > the raised floor I still would've custom fit it as necessary to fit my > build. It's ME I built the plane for, after all! :-) > > As for the curved pipe extensions -- I'm using them but only because I had > some fitting problems with the pipes -- in order to make them clear both the > cowl and the bottom of the firewall I had to rotate them a bit, but a side > effect of this is that the turndowns were "pigeon-toed". At the same time > Larry told me about his new, shallower turndown extensions, so I cut my > turndowns off and replaced them with the extensions, oriented the proper > direction. The turndowns aren't as sharp as the originals were, so there's > less drag (pipe out in the wind) and a little more thrust, in theory anyway. > Can't say what it did for the noise/vibration -- probably not much different > there. If I remember correctly, Larry said he's going with the shallower > turndowns standard in current systems. > > Mine are still clamped on with hose clamps but I'll get them welded one of > these days. > > Randall Henderson, RV-6 N6R (~175 hrs) > Portland, OR > http://www.edt.com/homewing > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RWood90641(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Subject: Re: Lycoming starting without prime
Be warned. Inducing raw gas into venturi may bring on a preheat you may not want. Please talk to a I.A. Ron ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: RV8 Elec ail trim
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Thread-Topic: RV-List: RV8 Elec ail trim Thread-Index: AcBjqaENgwLN9v54QDCCsBfIcNR89gAAMyEQ
From: "Bob Japundza" <Bob.Japundza(at)realmed.com>
Ralph, FWIW, I mated a MAC servo to the manual aileron trim spring system under the seats and it works great. The springs are unnoticeable; I "engineered" the system after I had already been flying without it. Basically, you mount the aileron trim lever about 1" below the seat pan. Orient the lever 90 degrees to one side, shorten the arm and drill a hole through it for the clevis. Mount the servo to the side of the center seat rib, connect everything and you're in business. I thought it was much easier to fabricate than it was to modify the aileron and have the tab sticking out, or in your case, modifying the -8 trim system with the sliding bar into the wing. I did look at the system used in the -8 before another lister sent me a picture of his setup. I'll check and see if I still have a pic of his installation; I never took pictures of mine. Bob Japundza RV-6 N244BJ O-360C/S flying 64 hours > -----Original Message----- > From: Ralph E. Capen [mailto:recapen(at)earthlink.net] > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 1:26 PM > To: RV-LIST > Subject: RV-List: RV8 Elec ail trim > > > > > For those of you -8 guys that have elec ail trim... > > How much throw does the rotational effect of the springs > actuated by the > trim servo actually produce? It doesn't look like it would > be that much but > I gotta ask. > > I'm putting an 8 elec ail trim kit into the left wing of my > 6QB since it's > ailerons already closed (QB style). What I'm trying to > determine is the > amount of throw at the bellcrank that needs to be replicated in my > installation in order to produce the same trim capabilities. > > Thanks, > Ralph Capen > RV6AQB Richardson, TX N822AR reserved > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ross Mickey" <rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Wheel Fairing Hole Plugs
Date: Dec 11, 2000
What are folks doing to fill the holes in Van's nose wheel fairing? I see Cleveland sells a 3/4" plug. Ross N9PT ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: Re: UV Smmoth Prime
Date: Dec 08, 2000
> OK Paint Guru's, has anybody used any of this UV Smooth Prime that > Spruce sells on the fiberglass S cowl, using a Roller instead of spraying > to cover pin holes in glass. > > Thanks in advance Harvey Sigmon RV-6AQB- finish stuff I don't qualify as a paint guru, but I have used UV Smooth Prime in the war to make fiberglass smooth. I think it's a good product and has several advantages, but you should also be aware of PPG K36/38 as an alternative. UV Smooth Prime is a water based urethane high-solids filler/primer. PPG K38 is a solvent based version of the same thing. There's a lot to this story so maybe a pros & cons approach would work here... UV SMOOTH PRIME Pros: -Cleans up (before curing) with water -Provides UV protection -Can be applied with roller Cons: -Sprays poorly -Takes forever to dry between coats -Expensive PPG K38 Pros: -Sprays beautifully -Drys quickly -Sands beautifully -Fills pinholes better than UV Smooth Prime Cons: -Expensive -No UV protection built in (your paint will provide some) Bottom line, on an overall basis I prefer K38 and have been usint it extensively and exclusively for my more recent pieces. I have undertaken a rather inolved cowl project that ended up requiring quite a bit of fiberglass work. Having worked with both of these materials I feel qualified to make the comments I have. Rolling the first coat when you have an incredibly porous surface to deal with seems like a good idea at first, but in retrospect K38 can be sprayed so heavily and easily that I think that is the way I'd go even for initial coats if I were to do it all over again. All of my initial fiberglass pieces such as my canopy skirt have an an initial coat of UV Smooth Prime which I rollered on and sanded almost all the way off, then multiple coats of K38. When you shoot K38 the best approach is to shoot 3-4 heavy coats with 10-15 minutes between coats. Wait 24 hrs and sand. Repeat this process 3-4 times and you should have a paintable surface. Do all sanding with 120 grit dry paper, then your last coat sand with 360-400 either wet or dry, and paint. You can see a bit more detail on the Painting page of my web site at www.rv-8.com Have fun, Randy Lervold RV-8, #80500, still filling, sanding, and painting www.rv-8.com Home Wing VAF ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ernest Kells" <ernest.kells(at)sympatico.ca>
Subject: RV6A or 9A
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Terry, Ed and others: When comparing performance of airplanes please use the same apples (or oranges). Comaring an RV-6x having vortex generators - and other variables, with an RV-9a without VG is meaningless. It is my belief that an RV-9A with an O-235 has a better time to climb performance than an F-16 (Uh..same engine). Ernest Kells RV-9A - Building Wings, Planning: O-235 Wood Prop Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario > Terry, did you ever figure out how much (if any) the VGs knocked off of your > top/cruise speed. I presume there was some loss, but gaining a stall speed > of 44 mph would be worth it in my opinion if it were not an excessive lost > of cruise speed. > > > > > > My RV6 with VG's stalls at 44 mph. I can go anywhere an RV9 can go > > and I can get there upside down.Terry > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: PPG K36/38 Hi solids primer
From: pcondon(at)csc.com
Date: Dec 11, 2000
12/11/2000 16:07:55 reposted for future e-searching with relative title. "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>@matronics.com on 12/08/2000 07:12:38 PM Please respond to rv-list(at)matronics.com Sent by: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com cc: Subject: Re: RV-List: UV Smmoth Prime > OK Paint Guru's, has anybody used any of this UV Smooth Prime that > Spruce sells on the fiberglass S cowl, using a Roller instead of spraying > to cover pin holes in glass. > > Thanks in advance Harvey Sigmon RV-6AQB- finish stuff I don't qualify as a paint guru, but I have used UV Smooth Prime in the war to make fiberglass smooth. I think it's a good product and has several advantages, but you should also be aware of PPG K36/38 as an alternative. UV Smooth Prime is a water based urethane high-solids filler/primer. PPG K38 is a solvent based version of the same thing. There's a lot to this story so maybe a pros & cons approach would work here... UV SMOOTH PRIME Pros: -Cleans up (before curing) with water -Provides UV protection -Can be applied with roller Cons: -Sprays poorly -Takes forever to dry between coats -Expensive PPG K38 Pros: -Sprays beautifully -Drys quickly -Sands beautifully -Fills pinholes better than UV Smooth Prime Cons: -Expensive -No UV protection built in (your paint will provide some) Bottom line, on an overall basis I prefer K38 and have been usint it extensively and exclusively for my more recent pieces. I have undertaken a rather inolved cowl project that ended up requiring quite a bit of fiberglass work. Having worked with both of these materials I feel qualified to make the comments I have. Rolling the first coat when you have an incredibly porous surface to deal with seems like a good idea at first, but in retrospect K38 can be sprayed so heavily and easily that I think that is the way I'd go even for initial coats if I were to do it all over again. All of my initial fiberglass pieces such as my canopy skirt have an an initial coat of UV Smooth Prime which I rollered on and sanded almost all the way off, then multiple coats of K38. When you shoot K38 the best approach is to shoot 3-4 heavy coats with 10-15 minutes between coats. Wait 24 hrs and sand. Repeat this process 3-4 times and you should have a paintable surface. Do all sanding with 120 grit dry paper, then your last coat sand with 360-400 either wet or dry, and paint. You can see a bit more detail on the Painting page of my web site at www.rv-8.com Have fun, Randy Lervold RV-8, #80500, still filling, sanding, and painting www.rv-8.com Home Wing VAF ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Shook" <billshook(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: RV6A or 9A
Date: Dec 11, 2000
> It is my belief that an RV-9A with > an O-235 has a better time to climb performance than an F-16 (Uh..same > engine). Hehee, this is true....but you still can't go upside down in it. :-) Bill -4 wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: Re: Canopy Bow, Side Rail Alignment
Date: Dec 08, 2000
> I am building an RV-8 QB. I am about to attach the canopy bow weldment > to the side rail. However, the angle of the weldment is greater than > the matching portion of the rail where it is flat on the inside and has > the upward angle towards the outside. The weldment lays flat on the > inside where the two bolts go in from the side, but there is a gap on > the outside where the five bolts attach downward. Anyone had the same > problem and what did you do to make the weldment lay flat? > > Stu McCurdy > RV-3, 74TX > RV-8 QB, Fuselage Several local builders have had fit problems such as you describe. Seems there is a fair amount of variation in individual rollbars. In each case they swapped them out and got one that fit pretty close. Of course you'll never get one to match perfectly. Randy Lervold RV-8, #80500, painting www.rv-8.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gordon or Marge Comfort" <gcomfo(at)tc3net.com>
Subject: Re: RV6A or 9A
Date: Dec 11, 2000
-----Original Message----- From: tdale4 <tdale4(at)email.msn.com> Date: Sunday, December 10, 2000 9:33 AM Subject: RV-List: RV6A or 9A > >Can anyone tell me the main differences between the RV6A and the RV9A? I've >looked at Van's homepage but the both look so similar. I guess the 9A is >better if you don't plan on doing aerobatics????? It seems easier to build, >almost as fast with a smaller engine, and a little larger inside. Any >opinions would be greatly appreciated. Like Eustace B., I was able to fly the RV-9A while at the homecoming last fall. I concur with what he has said and offer some additional comments. While the -9A resembles the -6A there are significant differences. The wing is of significantly higher aspect ratio (smaller chord and greater span) and uses a proprietary airfoil which I understand to have been designed by John Roncz. It uses slotted flaps which utilize a greater percentage of the wing trailing edge than the 4,6,8 series. The assembly method is different where instead of a folded trailing edge, the T.E. is riveted, resulting in a sharper edge. The canopy resembles the canopy developed for the Nigerian project and as such is higher than the -6. I believe the fuselage at the cockpit to be a bit (perhaps 1") wider than the -6 and this, combined with the narrower wing and higher canopy produce better all round visibility than the others. The engine/prop combination is the smoothest and quietest in my experience. Ground handling resembles the Beech Musketeer in that it has a castering nosewheel, but rudder authority at low speeds is good (better than the Beech) and little braking is needed to taxi normally. In flight, the stability margins appear to be greater in all axes than the earlier designs. In practice, this implies that the aircraft will not depart as quickly as the others and flying hands off for a bit indicated a relatively low work load for cross country flight. Control forces are moderate and well harmonized, a bit heavier than my -4 and the only -8 that I've had my hands on. No where near as heavy as a typical production aircraft. Glide path control is excellent, with great contribution from the flaps and touchdown in a three point attitude is easily accomplished. On the first landing, after slowing down and letting the nosewheel down, Jerry suggested a go around and with full flaps, before the throttle was fully open we were off and climbing within the flap operating speed and the R of C said 1100fpm before the flaps were retracted. It appears that the aircraft is not significantly slower than a comparably equipped -6A but will fly with excellent control at speed below which the -6 will have stalled. While the aircraft would, in my opinion, be good for training, I disagree completely with the assertion that is just that. It will be an outstanding cross country airplane, one that a pilot trained in Cessnas or Pipers will transition to readily and it will literally fly circles around most of them. If my mission was primarily cross country and there was no need for aerobatics it would be my hands down choice. Besides, I would never have to clean the bugs off my turbulators. My thanks to Jerry and to Van for the opportunity to sample what I believe to be an outstanding airplane. Gordon Comfort N363GC ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: RV6A or 9A
Date: Dec 11, 2000
From: Larry Pardue <n5lp(at)carlsbad.net>
> > >Can anyone tell me the main differences between the RV6A and the RV9A? I've >looked at Van's homepage but the both look so similar. I guess the 9A is >better if you don't plan on doing aerobatics????? It seems easier to build, >almost as fast with a smaller engine, and a little larger inside. Any >opinions would be greatly appreciated. > > I am a big admirer of the RV9A but would like to point out you give up a few other things besides aerobatics if you choose this plane. There is not a tip-up canopy or tailwheel option and, at this time, no quickbuild option. The last item may not be very significant with the more advanced 9A kit. I love my tip-up and tailwheel. Larry Pardue Carlsbad, NM RV-6 N441LP http://www.carlsbadnm.com/n5lp/index.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Im7shannon(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Subject: Re: RV6A or 9A
In a message dated 12/11/00 2:40:45 PM Pacific Standard Time, n5lp(at)carlsbad.net writes: > There is > not a tip-up canopy or tailwheel option and, at this time, no quickbuild > option. The last item may not be very significant with the more advanced > 9A kit. Larry, The tipup option is currently available, and I hear that Vans is now planning a tailwheel version since they have had so many requests. I see no need for a "quick build," I think the basic kit IS a quickbuild! Just my humble opinion, I am having so much fun building mine, I wouldn't want to miss out on any of it. But I am glad the main spars were prefabbed and annodized. See ya at the fly-in someday soon(I hope) Kevin Shannon -9A fuse & panel planning ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Subject: Van's alternator
From: b green <rvinfo(at)juno.com>
I just retrofitted with Van's alternator kit and was wondering if anyone had determined the automotive application for this unit. I know Van's sells a replacement for around $80 which I believe is a fair price, but if I am ever in a jam, it would be nice to be able to go to the local auto parts store and be able to ask for an alternator for an 81 Honda or whatever it is. Bruce Green ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Robertson" <mrobert569(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: N286RV flies!!
Date: Dec 11, 2000
All right, Carey! Congratulations!! Mike Robertson RV-8A 11.3 hours >From: Rvmils(at)AOL.COM >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV-List: N286RV flies!! >Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 11:00:11 EST > > >It was awesome. My brother and I put over 6 hours on it yesterday. We had >a >heavy right wing, squeezed the left aileron and now it flies hands off. >Performance at a 1000 w/0360 and culver prop is 173mph @2400, 182 @ 2500, >and >193 @ 2640 max rpm. The max rpm should go up as the engine breaks in and >that was with no wheel pants. I can't believe how easy this plane is to >fly, >land, and handle on the ground, and I can't wait for the rest of you to >find >out. What a joy to fly!!! Many thanks to list. >Blue Skies, >Carey Mills >RV4 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Van Artsdalen, Scott" <svanarts(at)unionsafe.com>
Subject: RV-4 question
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Okay RV4 builders/flyers. I'm being stupid again. On all RV4's I've seen there is a very smooth transition on the bottom of the fuselage between the square-ish bulkheads fwd of the rear seat and the rear bottom fuselage. Does anyone know where the drawing for that little devil is? A couple of builders told me that it's in the manual but I can't find it. -- Scott VanArtsdalen, MCSE, CCNA Network Administrator Union Safe Deposit Bank 209-946-5116 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "C J Heitman" <cjh(at)execpc.com>
Subject: RV6A or 9A
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Larry Pardue wrote: <<<"There is not a tip-up canopy or tailwheel option and, at this time, no quickbuild option. The last item may not be very significant with the more advanced 9A kit.">>> Larry, The plans for my -9A fuselage DO show a tip-up canopy version however I don't know if Van's is shipping it yet. As for the quick-build option, I agree that it isn't very significant. If you would like to see what my fuselage looks like after 40 days, click this link: http://www.execpc.com/~cjh/rv9a.html The standard kit is quick enough for me! Chris Heitman Dousman WI RV-9A N94ME (reserved) Fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 11, 2000
From: "Derrick L. Aubuchon" <n184da(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: RV-4 question
Scott, I didn't look in the manual, but look at drawing #40 of the plans, lower left corner:" F466 Trailing edge fillet." > >Okay RV4 builders/flyers. I'm being stupid again. On all RV4's I've seen >there is a very smooth transition on the bottom of the fuselage between the >square-ish bulkheads fwd of the rear seat and the rear bottom fuselage. >Does anyone know where the drawing for that little devil is? A couple of >builders told me that it's in the manual but I can't find it. > >-- >Scott VanArtsdalen, MCSE, CCNA >Network Administrator >Union Safe Deposit Bank >209-946-5116 Derrick L. Aubuchon RV-4 N184DA Byron, CA (C83) 125 Hrs n184da(at)pacbell.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Hurlbut" <shurlbut(at)island.net>
Subject: Re: RV6A or 9A
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Why is the 9A not capable of aerobatics? Design? Not even a simple roll? Steve Hurlbut Comox, BC shurlbut(at)island.net ----- Original Message ----- From: Gordon or Marge Comfort <gcomfo(at)tc3net.com> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 1:40 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: RV6A or 9A > > > -----Original Message----- > From: tdale4 <tdale4(at)email.msn.com> > To: rv6-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Sunday, December 10, 2000 9:33 AM > Subject: RV-List: RV6A or 9A > > > > > >Can anyone tell me the main differences between the RV6A and the RV9A? I've > >looked at Van's homepage but the both look so similar. I guess the 9A is > >better if you don't plan on doing aerobatics????? It seems easier to build, > >almost as fast with a smaller engine, and a little larger inside. Any > >opinions would be greatly appreciated. > > > Like Eustace B., I was able to fly the RV-9A while at the homecoming last > fall. I concur with what he has said and offer some additional comments. > > While the -9A resembles the -6A there are significant differences. The wing > is of significantly higher aspect ratio (smaller chord and greater span) and > uses a proprietary airfoil which I understand to have been designed by John > Roncz. It uses slotted flaps which utilize a greater percentage of the wing > trailing edge than the 4,6,8 series. The assembly method is different where > instead of a folded trailing edge, the T.E. is riveted, resulting in a > sharper edge. The canopy resembles the canopy developed for the Nigerian > project and as such is higher than the -6. I believe the fuselage at the > cockpit to be a bit (perhaps 1") wider than the -6 and this, combined with > the narrower wing and higher canopy produce better all round visibility than > the others. The engine/prop combination is the smoothest and quietest in my > experience. Ground handling resembles the Beech Musketeer in that it has a > castering nosewheel, but rudder authority at low speeds is good (better than > the Beech) and little braking is needed to taxi normally. > > In flight, the stability margins appear to be greater in all axes than the > earlier designs. In practice, this implies that the aircraft will not > depart as quickly as the others and flying hands off for a bit indicated a > relatively low work load for cross country flight. Control forces are > moderate and well harmonized, a bit heavier than my -4 and the only -8 that > I've had my hands on. No where near as heavy as a typical production > aircraft. Glide path control is excellent, with great contribution from the > flaps and touchdown in a three point attitude is easily accomplished. On > the first landing, after slowing down and letting the nosewheel down, Jerry > suggested a go around and with full flaps, before the throttle was fully > open we were off and climbing within the flap operating speed and the R of C > said 1100fpm before the flaps were retracted. It appears that the aircraft > is not significantly slower than a comparably equipped -6A but will fly > with excellent control at speed below which the -6 will have stalled. While > the aircraft would, in my opinion, be good for training, I disagree > completely with the assertion that is just that. It will be an outstanding > cross country airplane, one that a pilot trained in Cessnas or Pipers will > transition to readily and it will literally fly circles around most of them. > If my mission was primarily cross country and there was no need for > aerobatics it would be my hands down choice. Besides, I would never have to > clean the bugs off my turbulators. > > My thanks to Jerry and to Van for the opportunity to sample what I believe > to be an outstanding airplane. > > Gordon Comfort > N363GC > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 11, 2000
From: "Derrick L. Aubuchon" <n184da(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: RV-4 question - Correction
Oops,, I meant lower Right corner. Sorry about that. So my correct response should have been; Scott, I didn't look in the manual, but look at drawing #40 of the plans, lower right corner:" F466 Trailing edge fillet." > >Okay RV4 builders/flyers. I'm being stupid again. On all RV4's I've seen >there is a very smooth transition on the bottom of the fuselage between the >square-ish bulkheads fwd of the rear seat and the rear bottom fuselage. >Does anyone know where the drawing for that little devil is? A couple of >builders told me that it's in the manual but I can't find it. > >-- >Scott VanArtsdalen, MCSE, CCNA >Network Administrator >Union Safe Deposit Bank >209-946-5116 Derrick L. Aubuchon RV-4 N184DA Byron, CA (C83) 125 Hrs n184da(at)pacbell.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rvmils(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Subject: Re: RV-4 question - Correction
I ordered my finish kit without Van's wing roots and used Scott James'. It has a very smooth transition form leading edge to trailing flap edge to include the those square corners. Carey Mills RV4, 7.4 hrs ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Robertson" <mrobert569(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Wheel Fairing Hole Plugs
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Ross, I used a unibit. Worked great. Mike Robertson RV-8A N809RS >From: "Ross Mickey" <rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: "RV-List" >Subject: RV-List: Wheel Fairing Hole Plugs >Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 12:18:27 -0800 > > >What are folks doing to fill the holes in Van's nose wheel fairing? I see >Cleveland sells a 3/4" plug. > >Ross >N9PT > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 11, 2000
From: Kevin Horton <khorton(at)cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: RV6A or 9A
> >Why is the 9A not capable of aerobatics? Design? >Not even a simple roll? > >Steve Hurlbut >Comox, BC >shurlbut(at)island.net > Well, it all depends on what is meant by "capable of aerobatics". There are a lot of aspects to this issue. Flight characteristics, structural strength, performance, etc. From the flight characteristics and performance points of view, I suspect (emphasis on suspect) that the RV-9A would be capable of basic aerobatics. But, Van chose to design the structure to withstand lower structural loads than the other models. Van uses FAR 23 as his design standard for the structure. He doesn't have to do that, but he does because FAR 23 has proven to be a good structural design standard, and aircraft that meet FAR 23 requirements rarely shed major parts. Van designed all the other RV models to FAR 23 Aerobatic Category requirements, which means he had to design for a 6g flight load (it is optional to design to a higher load than that, and many aerobatic aircraft are designed to take much more than 6g). For the RV-9A, Van would have had to use a much heavier wing spar to meet those requirements, due to the longer span. He chose to save some weight, and design to FAR 23 Utility Category, which requires a 4.4g flight load. You could probably get away with doing loops and rolls in a 9A, for awhile. But some day you would screw up a manoeuvre, or hit a gust in the middle of one, and you could have a wing fail. Don't be tempted. The early RV-3s had a minor design deficiency, which meant they didn't quite meet the 6g requirement. Many of them did just fine, but a small number lost a wing, and the pilots died. The early RV-3 will withstand more g than the RV-9A. -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (fuselage 95% done) Ottawa, Canada http://eccentrix.com/misc/rv8/rv8.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Terry Burch" <rv6man(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: RV6A or 9A
Date: Dec 11, 2000
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson(at)carolina.rr.com> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 1:12 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: RV6A or 9A > > > Terry, did you ever figure out how much (if any) the VGs knocked off of your > top/cruise speed. I presume there was some loss, but gaining a stall speed > of 44 mph would be worth it in my opinion if it were not an excessive lost > of cruise speed. > > > Ed Anderson > > Ed, There are two of us with VG's here and niether of us can find any decrease in top end. If it does, it is so small that we cant measure it. High country exhaust is now offering the same kit we used.Terry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 12, 2000
From: Bruce Stewart <bruces(at)shoalhaven.net.au>
Subject: Re:0/235 Lyc
Hi All, anyone on here have a 0-235 in their RV 3 just want to pick your brains about something. Thanks Bruce ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Wndwlkr711(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Subject: RV-6 kits for sale
I am posting this for a friend that cannot because of medical reasons. RV-6 empennage and wings: empennage built except for the elevators-no extras. Wings are prepunch version, spars are built-no extras. He lives near Palm Springs, CA. Asking $5000. You pick it up. If interested, contact Karl Harmon at KiloHotel(at)prodigy.net or call 760-775-1065. Thanks for the time. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "James E. Clark" <jclark(at)conterra.com>
Subject: Unibit extender
Date: Dec 11, 2000
I got one from George Orndorff a while back. I suspect he still has them. I would suggest though that you ask if he now makes a longer version. I ended up replacing the steel rod with one about twice as long. Works great though for opening up the holes in the wings to run PVC for wiring. Oh, I also bought a unibit and had it machined down to 5/8" so it would go through at just the right size for the pipe. James RV6AQB ... still a long way away .. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Ralph E. Capen Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 1:18 PM Subject: RV-List: Unibit extender Folks, Where can I buy one of these magical beasts? Or, almost as good...How can I make one of these magical beasts? Or, third in line...does anyone have one of these magical beasts that they're willing to loan? Ralph Capen RV6AQB Richardson, TX N822AR - reserved ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 11, 2000
From: Charlie Kuss <chaskuss(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Lycoming IO-360-C1E6 for sale
Listers, A very honest and trustworthy local engine shop has a very nice angle valve (200 hp) Lycoming engine for sale. I am not connected with them in any way. I just thought someone out there (with more money than me) could find a home for it. Please contact Mark at Tropic Airpower directly. Charlie Kuss RV-8A finishing up wings and starting fuselage Boca Raton, Fl. PS Maybe if I'm really good, Santa will leave one of these under my Christmas tree??? :-) BEAUTIFUL LYCOMING IO-360-C1E6 200HP. ALL NEW LIMITS FROM THE CRANKSHAFT OUT TO THE CERMI-NIL CYLINDERS WITH BALANCED PISTONS. NEW MAGS/HARNESS/PLUGS. ALL NEW HARDWARE. O/H FUEL SYSTEM. TEST RUN WITH FAA 8130-3 YELLOW TAG ZERO SINCE MAJOR OVERHAUL. ALL NEW PARTS PER LYC S.B. 240R ALMOST CHROME POWDER COAT AND HIGH TEMP ENAMEL LYC GRAY PAINT. ONE YEAR/500 HOURS WARRANTY FIVE YEARS/TBO ON CERMI-NIL BARRELS OUTRIGHT 22,500.00. EXCHANGE 18,500.00 mark(at)tropicairpower.com 561-964-8770 www.tropicairpower.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Krhooper(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Subject: Re: Unibit extender
Ralph, Recently I needed to extend my unibit. I took a 1/4" drive socket that fit the shank (don't remember the size). The shank has indentions where I placed short pieces of saftey wire. The wire would not allow the bit to turn in the socket. Put on some tape to hold everything in place. Chucked a 1/4" drive extention in the drill. This all sounds pretty sloppy but the holes were true and I didn't have to wait for ordered tools to arrive. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gordon or Marge Comfort" <gcomfo(at)tc3net.com>
Subject: Re: RV6A or 9A
Date: Dec 11, 2000
>Why is the 9A not capable of aerobatics? Design? >Not even a simple roll? > >Steve Hurlbut >Comox, BC >shurlbut(at)island.net Steve: I'm not sure I'd say the 9A is not capable of aerobatics. Van could verify, but I believe the 9 is designed for lower max load factors. Also, the additional stability, smaller ailerons (proportionally) and consequent slower responses might make the recovery from a blown maneuver difficult to keep within G limits. Perhaps the aircraft would do aerobatic maneuvers, but it was not designed for them and it might be unwise to perform them. If it is a serious concern, I suggest you talk to Van about it. Gordon Comfort N363GC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BrownTool(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Subject: Brown Aviation Tool - ADV.
Advertisement... Just a quick note to remind everyone of our SALE on Spring Clecos which expires on 12-31-00 when new year prices will go into effect... All four popular sizes of Spring Clecos are on sale for only .29 each!! (Normally .33 each) Our clecos are Kwik-Lok brand, made by Zephyr Tools in the good ol USA. For more info visit our website and go to the " Kwik-Lok" section of our on-line catalog at: www.browntool.com On behalf of all six of us here at Brown Aviation Tool Supply, we wish all of you a very happy holiday season and the most prosperous and healthy new year. Happy Holidays! Michael Brown Brown Aviation Tool Supply Co. Oklahoma City, OK www.browntool.com browntool(at)aol.com 1-800-587-3883 405-688-6888 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CRASHOCONNOR(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 11, 2000
Subject: Re: RV6-List: RV6A or 9A
The RV9A has the same fuselage as the RV6a but has longer wings for more stability and slower stall speeds. Also I don't think you can get a quick build kit for an RV9A. RV9's were made for lower time pilots. i.e. easier to handle.Not as pitch and roll sensitive. Good luck ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Are Barstad" <abarstad(at)bconnex.net>
Subject: W-811 wing ribs to rear spar
Date: Dec 11, 2000
I'm surprised I couldn't find anything in the archives about this: I am in the process of drilling all the ribs to the wing spars. I discovered that the edge distances on the bottom holes on the rear spar are not sufficient - not even close. I only have this problem with the ribs underneath the 817GPP fork doubler (wing walk + one or two ribs). The pre-punched bottom rivet holes in the spar and doubler are much closer to the edge of the rear spar than all other locations. The weird thing is that I can't see any way that I could have done it much better (unless I filed the aft flanges of the ribs waaay too much). Anyone had this problem? Are RV-8 Wings ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 11, 2000
From: David Aronson <aronsond(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: RV-4 question
Scott: Don't worry about the plans. You will need to cut out a piece of cardboard or poster board and cut one, bending it to shape, cutting it down until it looks good. Cut it out of metal and rivet it. That project is a 1 to 2 hour one by now. It is fun because you can make it anydesign that your want! How is everything going? I am really getting into the FWF business. the money is really going out now!!! Best wishes for the holiday Dave Aronson RV4 N504RV "Van Artsdalen, Scott" wrote: > > > Okay RV4 builders/flyers. I'm being stupid again. On all RV4's I've seen > there is a very smooth transition on the bottom of the fuselage between the > square-ish bulkheads fwd of the rear seat and the rear bottom fuselage. > Does anyone know where the drawing for that little devil is? A couple of > builders told me that it's in the manual but I can't find it. > > -- > Scott VanArtsdalen, MCSE, CCNA > Network Administrator > Union Safe Deposit Bank > 209-946-5116 > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Nellis" <mnellis(at)emailusa.net>
Subject: Re: W-811 wing ribs to rear spar
Date: Dec 12, 2000
Are, I had a similar problem with a couple of ribs because I mis-measured a couple of times. It's a pretty easy fix really. Cut off the flanges and make them a little wider. The standard flange is about 1/2" or so. I took some scrap and made the flanges 3/4" ( or whatever width you wanted) and it works fine. You can see a picture of one here http://mnellis.jnet.net/RV-6_Page/images/Wings/DCP01525.JPG Mike Nellis - RV-6 N699BM (res) Plainfield, IL Skinning the Wings http://mnellis.jnet.net/rv-6_page ----- Original Message ----- From: "Are Barstad" <abarstad(at)bconnex.net> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:07 PM Subject: RV-List: W-811 wing ribs to rear spar > > I'm surprised I couldn't find anything in the archives about this: > > I am in the process of drilling all the ribs to the wing spars. I discovered > that the edge distances on the bottom holes on the rear spar are not > sufficient - not even close. I only have this problem with the ribs > underneath the 817GPP fork doubler (wing walk + one or two ribs). The > pre-punched bottom rivet holes in the spar and doubler are much closer to > the edge of the rear spar than all other locations. > > The weird thing is that I can't see any way that I could have done it much > better (unless I filed the aft flanges of the ribs waaay too much). > > Anyone had this problem? > > Are > RV-8 Wings > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Nellis" <mnellis(at)emailusa.net>
Subject: AOA & Gretz Heated pitot installation
Date: Dec 12, 2000
I've received a couple of queries on how the installation of my heated Pitot/Static kit went as well as the wing portion of the AOA instrument. I completed both installations tonight and posted them on the web site. Follow the links in the "Recently Updated Pages" box. http://mnellis.jnet.net/RV-6_Page/ Mike ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stephen J. Soule" <SSoule(at)pfclaw.com>
Subject: Wheel Fairing Hole Plugs
Date: Dec 12, 2000
I got some nylon plugs at the hardware store. Steve Soule Huntington, VT -----Original Message----- From: Ross Mickey [mailto:rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com] Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 3:18 PM To: RV-List Subject: RV-List: Wheel Fairing Hole Plugs What are folks doing to fill the holes in Van's nose wheel fairing? I see Cleveland sells a 3/4" plug. Ross N9PT ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ewinne(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 12, 2000
Subject: VG's
> > Terry, did you ever figure out how much (if any) the VGs knocked off of yourtop/cruise speed. I presume there was some loss, but gaining a stall speed of 44 mph would be worth it in my opinion if it were not an excessive lost > of cruise speed. > Ed, There are two of us with VG's here and niether of us can find any decrease in top end. If it does, it is so small that we cant measure it. High country exhaust is now offering the same kit we used.Terry Imagine how slow the RV-9 would fly with VG's! Ed Winne ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DThomas773(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 12, 2000
Subject: Mac Servos
One of the complaints I have heard about the electric elevator trim that it is overly sensitive causing difficulty in obtaining a proper setting. Is this also true of the aileron? It seems I read a post recently, all though I can't find it in the archives, about a device that reduces the output of little "Mac Servo." I would asppreciate any and all comments as I'm getting ready to order wings and havn't decided on the electric trim option yet. Dennis Thomas RV-9A Emp ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Fesenbek, Gary" <Gary.Fesenbek(at)marykay.com>
Subject: Wing lights
Date: Dec 12, 2000
I'm planning for the leading edge wing light Exactly which tool should I purchase for this job? I put the duckworks light in my airplane. A die grinder will work but I would consider using a dremmel instead. It is easier to control. I drilled the corner holes with my 1-inch step drill out to 3/4" and then just connected the holes by cutting with the dremmel. Cutting with the step drill will leave you nice rounded holes on the corners. Drill to a size of your choosing. The plexi they send with the light is okay but you may want to toss it in the landfill and pick up a piece of lexan instead. You can bend the lexan by putting it in the oven and letting it droop over a mold of your wing spars. Consider using floating nutplates for the attach points. They will be easier to put the screws into. Happy trails, Gary Fesenbek RV6A Dallas, TX ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Fesenbek, Gary" <Gary.Fesenbek(at)marykay.com>
Subject: Lycoming starting without prime
Date: Dec 12, 2000
I am trying to find out how difficult a carburated Lycoming is to start in cold weather without a primer. . At the present time my plane doesent have one and I will be starting it for the first time in a few weeks. Pumping the throttle while cranking is my plan. I figure I can add one later if needed. That was also my plan when I built my airplane. I live in Dallas, Tx and have a carburated O360, where (except for this week!!) the temps don't get that cold. Hey 20 deg is cold isn't it? Anyway. You didn't mention if you plan to preheat or not? It really doesn't matter though. One day you will fly cross country (as I did), away from your preheater electrical supply (as did I) and you will be stuck in a place with no FBO wishing you had taken the time to put in a primer. That said, I'm sure that you don't have to have a primer. However starting the engine without flooding it will be tricky and may leave you stranded with a dead battery. You may wear out one or more starters in your process of learning to start the airplane without a primer as well. I hope they are not any of those lightweight starters because they can be pretty pricey. I have a pretty good starting procedure now and rarely run my starter for more than five seconds. After 140 hours of flying this past year, I'm not sure I would be at that point without the primer. Gary Fesenbek RV6A Dallas, TX ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "<Eric.J.Henson(at)chase.com>
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 2.0.15) with ESMTP id for" ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 08:01:29.-0500(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: UV Smmoth Prime
Date: Dec 12, 2000
12/12/2000 08:02:04 AM A neat trick to fill pin holes with K-36/38 is to squeegee on the first coat. Just pour it on the surface and spread it. Lightly sand and then spray a normal coat. Goodbye pin holes. The coat I pour I do reduce a little with MEK. Eric Henson Insturment Panel "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>@matronics.com on 12/08/2000 07:12:38 PM Please respond to rv-list(at)matronics.com Sent by: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com cc: Subject: Re: RV-List: UV Smmoth Prime > OK Paint Guru's, has anybody used any of this UV Smooth Prime that > Spruce sells on the fiberglass S cowl, using a Roller instead of spraying > to cover pin holes in glass. > > Thanks in advance Harvey Sigmon RV-6AQB- finish stuff I don't qualify as a paint guru, but I have used UV Smooth Prime in the war to make fiberglass smooth. I think it's a good product and has several advantages, but you should also be aware of PPG K36/38 as an alternative. UV Smooth Prime is a water based urethane high-solids filler/primer. PPG K38 is a solvent based version of the same thing. There's a lot to this story so maybe a pros & cons approach would work here... UV SMOOTH PRIME Pros: -Cleans up (before curing) with water -Provides UV protection -Can be applied with roller Cons: -Sprays poorly -Takes forever to dry between coats -Expensive PPG K38 Pros: -Sprays beautifully -Drys quickly -Sands beautifully -Fills pinholes better than UV Smooth Prime Cons: -Expensive -No UV protection built in (your paint will provide some) Bottom line, on an overall basis I prefer K38 and have been usint it extensively and exclusively for my more recent pieces. I have undertaken a rather inolved cowl project that ended up requiring quite a bit of fiberglass work. Having worked with both of these materials I feel qualified to make the comments I have. Rolling the first coat when you have an incredibly porous surface to deal with seems like a good idea at first, but in retrospect K38 can be sprayed so heavily and easily that I think that is the way I'd go even for initial coats if I were to do it all over again. All of my initial fiberglass pieces such as my canopy skirt have an an initial coat of UV Smooth Prime which I rollered on and sanded almost all the way off, then multiple coats of K38. When you shoot K38 the best approach is to shoot 3-4 heavy coats with 10-15 minutes between coats. Wait 24 hrs and sand. Repeat this process 3-4 times and you should have a paintable surface. Do all sanding with 120 grit dry paper, then your last coat sand with 360-400 either wet or dry, and paint. You can see a bit more detail on the Painting page of my web site at www.rv-8.com Have fun, Randy Lervold RV-8, #80500, still filling, sanding, and painting www.rv-8.com Home Wing VAF ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BHESS36(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 12, 2000
Subject: RV8 Cowling instalation question
How do you install upper cowling on RV8 without constant speed prop mounted on engine? Bill ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stucklen, Frederic IFC" <stuckle(at)ifc.utc.com>
Subject: Lycoming starting without prime
Date: Dec 12, 2000
Richard, I have a primer in my RV-6A (160 HP) but rarely use it in cold weather as I always pre-heat. (Oil temps are always in the mid 60's prior to starting...) Pumping the throttle works good under those conditions. Once in a while I forget to turn set the timer that turns on the pre-heater. Last weekend that was the case. With the oil temps at 30*F, I tried to start it the same way and was not successful until I used the primer. Just could not get it to start by just pumping the throttle. So either plan on always starting warm, or install a primer...... Fred Stucklen N925RV (1680 hrs/7.5 Yrs) E. Windsor, CT 06088 WK Email: stuckle(at)ifc.utc.com Hm/Travel Email: wstucklen1(at)juno.com ____ From: "Zeidman, Richard B" <Richard.Zeidman(at)PHL.Boeing.com> Subject: RV-List: Lycoming starting without prime I am trying to find out how difficult a carburated Lycoming is to start in cold weather without a primer. . At the present time my plane doesent have one and I will be starting it for the first time in a few weeks. Pumping the throttle while cranking is my plan. I figure I can add one later if needed. Rich Zeidman RV6A N42RZ Almost done ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jones, Bryan D." <bryan.jones@lyondell-citgo.com>
Subject: RV8 Cowling installation question
Date: Dec 12, 2000
As I recall you can't. At least you can't do it easily and still get a good fit between the cowl and spinner. If you don't have your prop yet, you might be able to make a dummy prop hub and install the spinner with that instead. Bryan Jones -8 765BJ ~65-hrs Pearland, Texas -----Original Message----- From: BHESS36(at)AOL.COM [mailto:BHESS36(at)AOL.COM] Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 7:11 AM Subject: RV-List: RV8 Cowling instalation question How do you install upper cowling on RV8 without constant speed prop mounted on engine? Bill ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 12, 2000
From: Gene Gottschalk <geneg(at)rattler.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Countersinking perection
> >Are, > >Sure, glad it helped. It's an easy fix. I guess I should have responded to >the whole list. Just a little list shy. > >-Gene > >>Hi, >> >>That is exactly what my problem is. I will try to bend it a bit like you >>did. >> >>Thanks for the tip! >> >>Regards, >>Are >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Gene Gottschalk [mailto:geneg@rattler-f.gsfc.nasa.gov] >>Sent: December 11, 2000 3:07 PM >>To: abarstad(at)bconnex.net >>Subject: Fwd: RV-List: Countersinking perection >> >> >>Are, >> >>I found after I dropped my countersink cage and drill motor a couple of >>times the shaft was slightly bent. I chucked it into my drill press and >>rotated the chuck with a pointer in a stand right next to the pilot. It was >>out of round by about 3/32. This caused oblong holes. A few well placed >>pressures on the cage brought the shaft back into suitable alignment. I >>don't know if that's your problem, but it might be worth a check. >> >>-Gene Gottschalk >>RV-6A N700RV >> >> >> > >> >I just discovered that all the holes I countersunk on the wingspar for the >> >fuel tank attachment are somewhat oblong. Not alot, but oblong. It turns >>out >> >that my countersink cage is not perfectly straight. It's so little that >>it's >> >very hard to see, but I think this is the only way the holes can get >> >enlarged in one direction. >> > >> >Anyone else exeperienced this? Hopefully, it will still be ok for strength. >> >I tried another cage, another coutersink and another drill. It seems it's >> >impossible to get it perfectly straight so the little 'nipple' on the >> >countersink stays fixed in one spot. >> > >> >Am I to critical? >> > >> >Are >> >RV-8 Wings >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 12, 2000
From: Ed Hobenshield <edhob(at)kermode.net>
Subject: Re: canadian rv4
> >No that is Canadian dollars. About $28000 USD. >Not a bad deal but the engine had no logs and the aircraft was sold as is >where is. > >Steve Hurlbut >Comox, BC Thanks Steve, It did look good in the pictures! Ed H. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: RV-4 question
From: pcondon(at)csc.com
Date: Dec 12, 2000
12/12/2000 10:27:28 Sam James has a neat transition fairing for just that area. That is the one I used.Check The Yeller pages for Sam's contact information David Aronson (at)matronics.com on 12/12/2000 12:52:24 AM Please respond to rv-list(at)matronics.com Sent by: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com cc: Subject: Re: RV-List: RV-4 question Scott: Don't worry about the plans. You will need to cut out a piece of cardboard or poster board and cut one, bending it to shape, cutting it down until it looks good. Cut it out of metal and rivet it. That project is a 1 to 2 hour one by now. It is fun because you can make it anydesign that your want! How is everything going? I am really getting into the FWF business. the money is really going out now!!! Best wishes for the holiday Dave Aronson RV4 N504RV "Van Artsdalen, Scott" wrote: > > > Okay RV4 builders/flyers. I'm being stupid again. On all RV4's I've seen > there is a very smooth transition on the bottom of the fuselage between the > square-ish bulkheads fwd of the rear seat and the rear bottom fuselage. > Does anyone know where the drawing for that little devil is? A couple of > builders told me that it's in the manual but I can't find it. > > -- > Scott VanArtsdalen, MCSE, CCNA > Network Administrator > Union Safe Deposit Bank > 209-946-5116 > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dave Berryhill" <dwberryhill(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Lycoming and Auto gas date.)
Date: Dec 12, 2000
> The problem of water will NOT exist if you use a Tractor funnel with the > very fine mesh screen. I used one yesterday when filling my snow blower. I > got to where the gas would not pass until I emptied out the accumulated > water. > > You will also be surprised at the dirt that a tractor funnel will catch as > well. > ........snip O.K., I'll bite. Where do you get a tractor funnel? Dave No RV (yet) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)AOL.COM
Date: Dec 12, 2000
Subject: Re: Mac Servos
In a message dated 12/12/00 4:00:12 AM Pacific Standard Time, DThomas773(at)AOL.COM writes: << One of the complaints I have heard about the electric elevator trim that it is overly sensitive causing difficulty in obtaining a proper setting. Is this also true of the aileron? It seems I read a post recently, all though I can't find it in the archives, about a device that reduces the output of little "Mac Servo." >> Just buy two of Matt's trim governors from Van's and install them. Mine are set to produce about half speed which is close to perfect under all conditions. -GV (RV-6A N1GV) vanremog(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 12, 2000
From: "Derrick L. Aubuchon" <n184da(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: Mac Servos
There is also a "travel-limiter" available which is essentially, just a little plastic clip that attaches to the servo arm which trips the micro-switch before full extension. This does nothing however, to control the speed,, just the travel. > >In a message dated 12/12/00 4:00:12 AM Pacific Standard Time, >DThomas773(at)AOL.COM writes: > ><< One of the complaints I have heard about the electric elevator trim that >it > is overly sensitive causing difficulty in obtaining a proper setting. Is > this also true of the aileron? It seems I read a post recently, all though >I > can't find it in the archives, about a device that reduces the output of > little "Mac Servo." >> > >Just buy two of Matt's trim governors from Van's and install them. Mine are >set to produce about half speed which is close to perfect under all >conditions. > >-GV (RV-6A N1GV) >vanremog(at)aol.com Derrick L. Aubuchon RV-4 N184DA Byron, CA (C83) 125 Hrs n184da(at)pacbell.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "kempthornes" <kempthornes(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Aileron bellcrank
Date: Dec 12, 2000
Are wrote: > It just seems strange not to use washers under the bolt head. Put at least a thin washer under the bolt head if the bolt gets turned while tightening, especially if the bolt is on softer material like aluminum. If the head scuffs up the washer you can replace it. I put a thin washer under heads of all 3/16ths bolts attaching the wing spar to the aircraft. Another case where you might put a washer under the head is when the bolt is too long. It seems as if it should be okay to put up to three washers under the bolt head to shorten reach. Of course, getting the right length of bolt is really the right answer. You also use a "fender" washer (AN910?) when appropriate. hal ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Mac Servos Trim Governer Trim Bias Trim Sensitivity
From: pcondon(at)csc.com
Date: Dec 12, 2000
12/12/2000 12:06:28 Reposted with title keywords for future e-searching of Matts' archives Vanremog(at)AOL.COM@matronics.com on 12/12/2000 11:01:54 AM In a message dated 12/12/00 4:00:12 AM Pacific Standard Time, DThomas773(at)AOL.COM writes: << One of the complaints I have heard about the electric elevator trim that it is overly sensitive causing difficulty in obtaining a proper setting. Is this also true of the aileron? It seems I read a post recently, all though I can't find it in the archives, about a device that reduces the output of little "Mac Servo." >> Just buy two of Matt's trim governors from Van's and install them. Mine are set to produce about half speed which is close to perfect under all conditions. -GV (RV-6A N1GV) vanremog(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randall Henderson" <randallh(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: cabin floor
Date: Dec 12, 2000
Jim, Yes that's pretty similar to what I did. Differences are: 1) No extra angles on the sides -- I just underlapped/overlapped the floor skin with those existing large side/floor fuselage angles. By that I mean, I underlapped on the aft side, overlapped on the fwd side, of that intermediate bulkhead. Cut out for the bulkhead. Nutplates aft of the bulkhead are in the floor piece; fwd of the bulkhead are in the angle. Is this clear? Hard to describe without a drawing. In any case, this was a bit simpler and although the floor isn't completely flat there it's not noticable. 2) I put a small separate piece in the middle behind the battery box as well. Just overlapped the other two pieces. I used 1/2" thick "uniroyal charcoal" soundproofing foam under the floor pieces. Since it's not thick enough to take up all the space, I just sprinkled little snips of the stuff over the top so it would be compressed in there and dampen the vibration. Didn't use any adhesive. Great results. It's quieter than other O-360 powered RV-6s I've been in. And my main goal was to dampen floor vibration and that has worked -- when I lift my feet there's no increase in noise/vibration. Randall ----- Original Message ----- From: "jim jewell" <jjewell(at)okanagan.net> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:29 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: cabin floor > > Hello Randall, > I just recently spent a few days putting in floors in the footwell area of > my 6-A. Mike Nellis has put some photos and drawings of my effort on his web > site <http://mnellis.jnet.net/RV-6_Page/index.htm> Is this the kind of idea > that you have done with your floors? I will be bonding some Sound / heat > insulation to the bottoms of the floor sheets later. > > Jim in Kelowna > > --- Original Message ----- > From: Randall Henderson <randallh(at)home.com> > To: > Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 11:43 PM > Subject: Re: RV-List: cabin floor > > > > > > > For those who have installed a cabin floor which would raise your heels > > > toward rudder & brake pedals--does that require adjusting the height of > > > the pedals? Also is anyone using the curved pipe extensions? > > > > I did put in a "raised" floor (foam between the stiffeners and .032 over > the > > top), and I did raise the rudder pedals, by about an inch. However if I > > didn't have such big feet I migh'tve left them in the normal place. I also > > moved them forward about 3/4" which is more comfortable for me. Basically > I > > spent some time custom fitting the pedals to fit ME. Even if I hadn't put > in > > the raised floor I still would've custom fit it as necessary to fit my > > build. It's ME I built the plane for, after all! :-) > > > > As for the curved pipe extensions -- I'm using them but only because I had > > some fitting problems with the pipes -- in order to make them clear both > the > > cowl and the bottom of the firewall I had to rotate them a bit, but a > side > > effect of this is that the turndowns were "pigeon-toed". At the same time > > Larry told me about his new, shallower turndown extensions, so I cut my > > turndowns off and replaced them with the extensions, oriented the proper > > direction. The turndowns aren't as sharp as the originals were, so there's > > less drag (pipe out in the wind) and a little more thrust, in theory > anyway. > > Can't say what it did for the noise/vibration -- probably not much > different > > there. If I remember correctly, Larry said he's going with the shallower > > turndowns standard in current systems. > > > > Mine are still clamped on with hose clamps but I'll get them welded one of > > these days. > > > > Randall Henderson, RV-6 N6R (~175 hrs) > > Portland, OR > > http://www.edt.com/homewing > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randall Henderson" <randallh(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: cabin floor
Date: Dec 12, 2000
I forgot to mention: it does add a few pounds. I started with .040 thinking that would be needed but switched to .032 -- since it'll be supported by the foam, and you'll probably have carpet over it, it's fine. Maybe could even get away with .025. Certainly could do .025 for the center piece. Randall ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Robertson" <mrobert569(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: RV8 Elec ail trim
Date: Dec 12, 2000
Ralph, I am still working on getting the roll trim just right so I have recently had lots of experience here. Keeping in mind that the fuel tanks are 21 gallons each in the -8, the electrical trim system as it comes from van's goes just past the point that will compensate for about 1/2 fuel tank unbalance. I have had a light wing that crimping the trailing edge of the aileron on the light wing would not do enough so one of the steps that I tried was to install slightly larger/stiffer springs. That helped was but wasn't quite


- - - , 20- - December 12, 2000

RV-Archive.digest.vol-ju