RV-Archive.digest.vol-kv

May 30, 2001 - June 05, 2001



      
      Some thought the constant speed name meant that the prop would turn a
      constant speed while the engine varied.  Some that the prop speed varied
      forcing the engine to stay constant etc.  Some  just said fly by the manual
      as thinking about it gets the pilot all discombobulated.   Further confusion
      comes from flat pitch, high setting, climb pitch and other terms tossed
      around.
      
      - snip -
      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Greg Tanner" <gtanner(at)bendcable.com>
Subject: Flashing lights to full brightness
Date: May 30, 2001
Sounds like a good idea "except" I would have to have help on how to do this. I can follow pictures pretty good! :o) Greg Tanner RV-9A WINGS O-320 D1A/CATTO N80BR RESERVED -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of W. Granville Batte Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 10:55 AM Subject: RV-List: Flashing lights to full brightness Bill, Greg, For getting full brightness out of flashing incandescent lights, you may want to consider biasing them with a "low level" "on". This could be achieved by inserting a light dimmer circuit (similar to a recent article in Kit Plane) in the manner of a logical "OR" where the level is turned up just enough to get the filament to barely glow, but not enough put out any significant light. Thereby, the filament doesn't have to "ramp-up" as far, and the response time to full brightness is much quicker. Just a thought, hope it helps. Granville From: Bob Haan <bhaan(at)easystreet.com> Subject: RE: RV-List: Wiring REV 4 > >Bill, >On your wig wag schematic, you show GE 50 watt low voltage track lighting >bulbs. Are these what your landing/light taxi lights are? I have the >Duckworth lights and was planning on swapping the 50 watt bulbs for some 100 >watters. Would this overload the wig wag system? > >Greg Greg, Very important question. To be seen well in daylight, the wigwaging lights should be at least 100 watts each side and they must come up to full bright. If the WIgWag rate is to fast, they will not get to full bright. Bob Bob Haan http://easystreet.com/~bhaan/ bhaan(at)easystreet.com Portland, OR RV6A 24461 Wiring the panel ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 30, 2001
From: joe wiza <jwiza1(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: RV8-List: another dumb question
Couple of years back Vans did not recommend this, to much viberation seems the wings dampen it. Joe RV6A/flying --- gert wrote: > > > Didn't somebody a couple of years back wreck an rv > by running the engine > without wings. If I remember well the fuse rolled > when the engine did a > major hickup....could be wrong though...but ever > since reading this > somewhere I have wondered about that.... > > Gert > > Sally and George wrote: > > > > > > > Don't think you'll do any structural damage. Why > not wait till the wings > > are hung, though. Then you won't have to rig a > fuel tank and feed. How you > > gonna tie it down? > > > > George > > N888GK > > > > >From: old ogre <jollyd(at)teleport.com> > > >Reply-To: rv8-list(at)matronics.com > > >To: "RV-8-List (E-mail)" > > >Subject: RV8-List: another dumb question > > >Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 18:43:51 -0700 > > > > > >--> RV8-List message posted by: old ogre > > > > > > >I have a RV8A...the fuse is almost finished, with > the engine hung, > > >wired, plumbed, ect...the wings are still > off...is it safe to run the > > >engine with the wings off, or will sturcture > damage result?....thanks.. > > > > > > > > > > -- > is subject to a download and archival fee in the > amount of $500 > > > > through > > http://www.matronics.com/archives > http://www.matronics.com/emaillists > > Matronics! > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kevin Schlosser" <kevinschlosser(at)msn.com>
Subject: Canopy / LG Type, Etc.
Date: May 30, 2001
[Lurk Mode Off] Hi Folks, I've been in semi-lurk mode lately. I'm pursuing my pilot's license and I am seriously planning on building my own aircraft. I'm very close to making my decision on the kit I plan to build. I was initially thinking of building a Kolb Mark 3 Extra as my first kit and do an RV-7 later (money and skill intimidation factors). After reading my course study from RVU (Internet RV University :-) and seeing all the websites documenting construction of the RV, I think I can do it too. I'm mechanically inclined for all but the engine. I'll learn though. I also have a few friends that restore warbirds and private aircraft. They are happy to advise when I get jammed up. My wife knows it is inevitable that I am going to build a plane. After talking with her, her latest thoughts are: 1) As long as she can still garage her car, fine. 2) She wants it to be a side-by-side seating arrangement so she doesn't just get thrown in back just for the ride. 3) Make sure I still furnish the house. It looks like she's finally accepting the fact that I will build an airplane. I'm looking at building a RV-7. I like the idea of the choice of canopy design and landing gear. I was thinking of doing the taildragger 7 with a sliding canopy. I had a few questions about the canopy though. Which canopy would be considered safer in the event of a nose-over rough field landing. I would think you'd have a better chance of getting the canopy open to get out in a hurry. I would also think that the roll bar being built into the windshield would add to the survivability and safety in a nose-over. While nobody plans to nose-over thier aircraft, I'd like to increase my odds should it occur. I read about the birdstrike incident on one of the websites and it makes you think a bit. I like the view that the tip up canopy provides too. There's something to be said for a nice unobstructed view. I would sacrifice the ability to attach anything to the front windshield roll-over bar (compass, etc) if I went with the tip-up. I also like the ability to taxi and run-up with the canopy rolled back in the summer for those occasional long waits for the pilots in front of me. It would also be nice to be able to lock the canopy in the slightly open position for venting at summer fly-ins. Does the jettison option exist for both canopy types? How about height clearance for tall folks. Which canopy offers more head clearance? I'm nearly positive I want a taildragger LG. I will need transition training to tailwheel though. I just need some ideas about the canopy choices before I make my decision. Kevin Schlosser -< PropellerHead >- Future RV-7 Builder I haven't been this jazzed since the last day of school as a kid! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rv6plt(at)cs.com
Date: May 30, 2001
Subject: Re: cheap fuel in Missouri?
Don,t know current prices but Salem, Mo. used to be good. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Im7shannon(at)aol.com
Date: May 30, 2001
Subject: Re: Canopy / LG Type, Etc.
You forgot to ask what type of primer to use, too. Just kidding, there is tons of info in the archives debating slider vs tipup, tail vs nose, primer wars. It all just boils down to personal preference. IMHO Kevin in WA -9A hooking up turn signals and windshield wipers > > [Lurk Mode Off] > Hi Folks, > > I've been in semi-lurk mode lately. I'm pursuing my pilot's license an> d I am seriously planning on building my own aircraft. I'm very close to> making my decision on the kit I plan to build. I was initially thinking> of building a Kolb Mark 3 Extra as my first kit and do an RV-7 later (mo> ney and skill intimidation factors). After reading my course study from > RVU (Internet RV University :-) and seeing all the websites documenti> ng construction of the RV, I think I can do it too. I'm mechanically inc> lined for all but the engine. I'll learn though. I also have a few frie> nds that restore warbirds and private aircraft. They are happy to advise> when I get jammed up. > > My wife knows it is inevitable that I am going to build a plane. After> talking with her, her latest thoughts are: 1) As long as she can still g> arage her car, fine. 2) She wants it to be a side-by-side seating arrange> ment so she doesn't just get thrown in back just for the ride. 3) Make s> ure I still furnish the house. It looks like she's finally accepting the> fact that I will build an airplane. > > I'm looking at building a RV-7. I like the idea of the choice of canop> y design and landing gear. I was thinking of doing the taildragger 7 wit> h a sliding canopy. I had a few questions about the canopy though. Whic> h canopy would be considered safer in the event of a nose-over rough fiel> d landing. I would think you'd have a better chance of getting the canop> y open to get out in a hurry. I would also think that the roll bar being> built into the windshield would add to the survivability and safety in a> nose-over. While nobody plans to nose-over thier aircraft, I'd like to > increase my odds should it occur. I read about the birdstrike incident o> n one of the websites and it makes you think a bit. > > I like the view that the tip up canopy provides too. There's something> to be said for a nice unobstructed view. I would sacrifice the ability > to attach anything to the front windshield roll-over bar (compass, etc) i> f I went with the tip-up. I also like the ability to taxi and run-up wit> h the canopy rolled back in the summer for those occasional long waits fo> r the pilots in front of me. It would also be nice to be able to lock th> e canopy in the slightly open position for venting at summer fly-ins. > > Does the jettison option exist for both canopy types? How about height> clearance for tall folks. Which canopy offers more head clearance? > > I'm nearly positive I want a taildragger LG. I will need transition trai> ning to tailwheel though. > I just need some ideas about the canopy choices before I make my decision> . > > Kevin Schlosser > -< PropellerHead >- > Future RV-7 Builder > I haven't been this jazzed since the last day of school as a kid! > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ferdfly(at)aol.com
Date: May 30, 2001
Subject: Re: Cowl Hinge Pins
In a message dated 5/29/01 5:31:03 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ENewton57(at)aol.com writes: > My question is regarding the 1/8" hinge pins for the cowl. They seem very > flexible and soft. When you bend them even slightly, they stay bent. They > obviously are not made out of the same material as the other hinge which > are > very stiff and springy. Are they made from a different material? Seems > kind > of weak to me. They bend fairly easy while I try to push them into the > hinges and seem to be getting distorted somewhat. > > Thanks, > Eric Newton - Long Beach, Mississippi > RV-6A N57ME (Reserved) (Engine Cowling) > http://www.ericsrv6a.com > > Eric, Your local hobby shop stocks piano wire in 36 in lengths, It`s used in R C modeling. The wire in my hinges is .093 in diameter. Yours too probably. Fred LaForge RV-4 180 CS EAA tech counselor ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Terry Watson" <tcwatson(at)seanet.com>
Subject: Builder profile
Date: May 30, 2001
Guys, Have a look at the very last page of AOPA Pilot, the June issue, and see what kind of company we keep. You have seen the name of this RV-7 builder on the RV list. Terry (as in Terrence) RV-8A fuselage Seattle ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Canopy / LG Type, Etc.
Date: May 30, 2001
I personally find the slider to be THE numero uno choice for getting the most utility from an RV. The tip-up -6A I recently took for a spin smacked me on the noggin from a slight wind gust blowing the canopy down as I was boarding the aircraft. Not fun. The view is, indeed, very nice, but it's not a remarkable difference from the slider with the rollbar. All the RV's have wonderful visibility, with any flavor of canopy. I really enjoy being able to slide the canopy all the way aft during taxi operations in my -8. That prop produces a lot of cabin ventilation. You also get the added benefit of being able to hang your arm over the side so as to both LOOK cool and BE cool at the same time. Survivability of either canopy design when upside down in the mud can be debated at great length. I do know that a former -8A driver ended up this way and both he and his wife were able to get out of the airplane. The rollbar supported the airplane adequately. I have no personal knowlege of how a tip-up handles this scenario. It does appear somewhat easier to completely jettison the tip-up via the handle installed per plans. There is no such provision for the slider, and would have to be done via pull pins on each side to detach the slider frame from the rollers. The choice of landing gear is also a hotly debated topic! Just pick the one you like. I like the taildragger, so that's what I chose. I like the way it looks on the -8, but actually like the appearance of the -6A versus the -6. Go figure. Have fun making your decision. Brian Denk RV8 N94BD 208 hrs. Arlington and Longmont planned for this summer. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Canopy / LG Type, Etc.
Date: May 30, 2001
I personally find the slider to be THE numero uno choice for getting the most utility from an RV. The tip-up -6A I recently took for a spin smacked me on the noggin from a slight wind gust blowing the canopy down as I was boarding the aircraft. Not fun. The view is, indeed, very nice, but it's not a remarkable difference from the slider with the rollbar. All the RV's have wonderful visibility, with any flavor of canopy. I really enjoy being able to slide the canopy all the way aft during taxi operations in my -8. That prop produces a lot of cabin ventilation. You also get the added benefit of being able to hang your arm over the side so as to both LOOK cool and BE cool at the same time. Survivability of either canopy design when upside down in the mud can be debated at great length. I do know that a former -8A driver ended up this way and both he and his wife were able to get out of the airplane. The rollbar supported the airplane adequately. I have no personal knowlege of how a tip-up handles this scenario. It does appear somewhat easier to completely jettison the tip-up via the handle installed per plans. There is no such provision for the slider, and would have to be done via pull pins on each side to detach the slider frame from the rollers. The choice of landing gear is also a hotly debated topic! Just pick the one you like. I like the taildragger, so that's what I chose. I like the way it looks on the -8, but actually like the appearance of the -6A versus the -6. Go figure. Have fun making your decision. Brian Denk RV8 N94BD 208 hrs. Arlington and Longmont planned for this summer. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Canopy / LG Type, Etc.
Date: May 30, 2001
I personally find the slider to be THE numero uno choice for getting the most utility from an RV. The tip-up -6A I recently took for a spin smacked me on the noggin from a slight wind gust blowing the canopy down as I was boarding the aircraft. Not fun. The view is, indeed, very nice, but it's not a remarkable difference from the slider with the rollbar. All the RV's have wonderful visibility, with any flavor of canopy. I really enjoy being able to slide the canopy all the way aft during taxi operations in my -8. That prop produces a lot of cabin ventilation. You also get the added benefit of being able to hang your arm over the side so as to both LOOK cool and BE cool at the same time. Survivability of either canopy design when upside down in the mud can be debated at great length. I do know that a former -8A driver ended up this way and both he and his wife were able to get out of the airplane. The rollbar supported the airplane adequately. I have no personal knowlege of how a tip-up handles this scenario. It does appear somewhat easier to completely jettison the tip-up via the handle installed per plans. There is no such provision for the slider, and would have to be done via pull pins on each side to detach the slider frame from the rollers. The choice of landing gear is also a hotly debated topic! Just pick the one you like. I like the taildragger, so that's what I chose. I like the way it looks on the -8, but actually like the appearance of the -6A versus the -6. Go figure. Have fun making your decision. Brian Denk RV8 N94BD 208 hrs. Arlington and Longmont planned for this summer. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson(at)carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: RE: Odyssey Battery...
Date: May 30, 2001
> > > Hi all... > > I just bought an Odyssey PC625 Drycell battery from http://abatterystore.com > for $73.95 (free shipping)... They also sell the PC680 for $98.54 (free > shipping)... Just call them at 1-888-228-8379 and tell them what you > want... > > You can find specs on this battery here: > http://www.odysseybatteries.com/motorcycle.htm > and > http://www.batteriesplus.com/Product/slacidrechg.html > > Bill VonDane, Colorado Springs, CO > RV-8A, N8VD, Wiring & Plumbing > http://vondane.com/rv8a/ > > I might add that if you look up the battery with the code P680MJ the "MJ" stands for Metal Jacket (for motorcycle use). You do not need the MJ version for your RV and they cost/weigh slightly more than without the metal jacket. Ask for their price on the P680 without metal jacket. By the way, I just purchased two P685s a month or two ago and the quoted prices on several web sites ranged from $115 to $159, so these prices are really good. Ed Anderson RV-6A N494BW Matthews, NC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "William Davis" <rvpilot(at)mpinet.net>
Subject: Re: fuel press fluctuation
Date: May 30, 2001
Eric, Lycoming service bulletin #548 Applies to fuel pumps LW-15472, LW-15473, & LW-16335. If the last 4 digits in the code (The date code) stamped on the mounting flange are one of the following, the pump should be inspected and replaced. 3900 4000 4100 4200 4300 4400 4500 4600 4700 4800 4900 5000 5100 5200 0101 0201 0301 0401 If the letter "A" is stamped as a suffix after the date code, the pump has been repaired by the Mfg. and replacement is not necessary They dont say who is going to pay for this but I guess it will be the customer as usual. Regards, Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: <Eric.J.Henson(at)chase.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 8:24 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: fuel press fluctuation > > > Hey Bill, > > Can you send me the #s listed? I have an IO-320 and this high pressure > makes me a little nervous. Is this the engine driven pump? > > Thanks > > Eric > > > "William Davis" (at)matronics.com on 05/26/2001 09:38:34 > PM > > Please respond to rv-list(at)matronics.com > > > Sent by: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > > > To: > cc: > Subject: Re: RV-List: fuel press fluctuation > > > Stewart, > > Have you seen the Lycoming service letter about the high pressure engine > pumps? They have had 3 of them fail in the test cell. Suspect numbers are > listed. I don't have the letter in front of me, it is out at the hangar. > > Bill N48WD > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <RVer273sb(at)aol.com> > To: > Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 8:20 PM > Subject: RV-List: fuel press fluctuation > > > > > > I have a good problem for you fellow RVers. > > I experienced fuel press fluctuations on the way home from > > a 100 mile trip. (fuel injected) I had pressures from 18 to 28 > > on the engine driven pump. Seemed to be mostly on the right > > tank. I had a bouncy fuel press gage anyway so I installed a > > new gage. Same problem... Installed a new engine driven pump. > > Same problem... Removed the right tank and opened up inboard > > access plate. Checked flop tube for security and vaccuum checked > > for leaks, none found. Ran a wire thru the vent tube and also blew it > > out and found no problem. Closed up and sealed the tank. Filled it > > up and flew today. Same problem with even some engine stumbling > > thrown in... All fuel lines to the boost pump are 3/8 alum... > > Any suggestions out there in RV land??? > > Stewart RV4 N273SB > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 30, 2001
From: ENewton57(at)aol.com
Subject: Cowl Hinge Pins
Just for everyone's info. The 1/8" hinges meant to secure the cowling on the plane comes with aluminum hinge pins installed. These are very soft and in my opinion are not meant to be used for the actual assembly. The kit also comes with some extra 1/8" stainless steel pins that are meant to be used. Maybe its just me, but I couldn't find reference to this fact in the manual or plans about substituting the pins. Lucky for me I'm on this list and guys like you can help out newbies like me. This is for the archives and future builders. File it away in your memory banks for when you get to the cowling installation. Eric Newton - Long Beach, MS RV 6A (Cowling fitted - baffles are next) www.ericsrv6a.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 30, 2001
From: "Boyd C. Braem" <bcbraem(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: c/s prop/throttle techniques
There is indeed confusion surrounding the C/S prop because of the variables involved: mixture, prop pitch, engine rpm, the prop governor/oil pressure and +/- turbocharging/supercharging. We'll dispense with boosted air, for now, including big radials. You'll notice that the Lycoming power charts that have "oversquare" recommendations are for CRUISE power at 75% or less. There's a huge difference between (1)loafing along fat, dumb and happy at 65% power and (2)having to apply immediate full throttle for whatever reason. If your prop can't absorb and transmit the acceleration load, you aren't going to have much of an engine left. And, what did you do with the mixture control? Can you spell detonation? Oversquare is also a relative term (like my brother-in-law)--the more oversquare you are, the more trouble you're likely to generate if you have to push full power. Cruising is cool. How many of you know what the default pitch position on your prop is when you lose oil pressure while trying an emergency go around or going down hill in an aerobatic maneuver? Are your blades counter-weighted or non-counter-weighted and which way does your governor send the oil? As to shock-cooling, Lycoming recommends a minimum of 15" MAP at the "lowest cruise rpm"--this is not to exceed a cooling greater than a CHT of 50 degrees per minute. I know this sounds like a really shit*y lecture, but, the point is, is that cruising oversquare, within Lycoming guidelines, is not, in any way, like accelerating to full power in an oversquare condition. Boyd Braem "Benson, Bradley" wrote: > > > I would have asked the CFI to show me how the prop could turn at a different > speed than the crankshaft it was attached to :-). > > Cheers, > Brad > > -----Original Message----- > From: kempthornes [mailto:kempthornes(at)home.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 11:34 AM > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: c/s prop techniques > > > - snip - > > Some thought the constant speed name meant that the prop would turn a > constant speed while the engine varied. Some that the prop speed varied > forcing the engine to stay constant etc. Some just said fly by the manual > as thinking about it gets the pilot all discombobulated. Further confusion > comes from flat pitch, high setting, climb pitch and other terms tossed > around. > > - snip - > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "kempthornes" <kempthornes(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: c/s prop techniques
Date: May 30, 2001
Jody Villa discombobulates my poor mind with: >It's really manifold vacuum not pressure. I wondered about that during my training too. I used to have a truck with a vacuum gauge. It went highest when decelerating. When I stomped the throttle the vac would go down to a few inches. Surely MAP is not an accurate way to determine power being output as it is very high with the engine shut off. Maybe it just measures atmospheric pressure (29.92 on a standard day) inside the manifold. Hopefully during operation the MAP gauge shows a value less than the barometric pressure. At full power the difference is just a few inches. My head hurts, back to Java. Hal Kempthorne RV6a N7HK (Valentine) FLYING ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Canopy / LG Type, Etc. & CS Prop
Date: May 30, 2001
From: Larry Pardue <n5lp(at)carlsbad.net>
> > To this poster who has questions of canopy type and landing gear type and to other recent posters about constant speed propellers. May I recommend Doug Reeves' mega RV website http://www.vansaircraft.net Among the many things on this site is a great treatment of the above questions by Martin Sutter. Martin was my sheet metal instructor and he has had wood fixed pitch, metal fixed pitch and constant speed props on his own taildragger/tipup six. He discusses all these options and also discusses taildragger versus trigear in the most objective way I have seen. There is another article by an anonymous poster regarding the gear question. I can't recommend it as highly, but it is another opinion. Larry Pardue Carlsbad, NM RV-6 N441LP Flying http://www.carlsbadnm.com/n5lp/index.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Van Artsdalen, Scott" <svanarts(at)unionsafe.com>
Subject: Builder profile
Date: May 30, 2001
Don't leave us in suspense! I don't subscribe... -- Scott VanArtsdalen, MCSE, CCNA Network Administrator Union Safe Deposit Bank 209-946-5116 -----Original Message----- From: Terry Watson [mailto:tcwatson(at)seanet.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 1:58 PM To: rv-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RV-List: Builder profile Guys, Have a look at the very last page of AOPA Pilot, the June issue, and see what kind of company we keep. You have seen the name of this RV-7 builder on the RV list. Terry (as in Terrence) RV-8A fuselage Seattle ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RVer273sb(at)aol.com
Date: May 30, 2001
Subject: Re: fuel press fluctuation
Thank you for this information!!! Stewart, RV4 Co. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wes" <whays(at)camalott.com>
Subject: Fw: Fw: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer!
Date: May 30, 2001
Folks, I received this message from a friend of mine. I checked my computer and it was present. I have Norton virus protection and it got by it. Supposedly gets by McAfee also. You may have gotten this from me so I am forwarding this information to you. Check Quickly, the date of activation is supposed to be June 1, 2001. The directions are below. Thanks. Wes Hays ----- Original Message ----- From: "Carolyn West" <ckjmwest(at)wtez.net> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 7:36 PM Subject: Re: Fw: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer! > All, > > I received this from my Uncle, who received it from his daoughter-in-law > who works in Washington, DC. I performed the search, found the supposedly > infected file and deleted it. You may want to do the same. > > James > > > I got this message from our daughterinlaw Ada who works in Wash.D.C.with > computers & satalite comunications. I checked this info out on my computer > and found it and got it out of the system..follow her directions and if > you got it this should clear you > ......good luck BEN > ----- Original Message ----- > Subject: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer! > > My e-mail is on the blink at work, but I received this e-mail from a friend. > Please check your computers! I did and found this virus. He did also. > > Since I can't forward his e-mail, I'm going to have to type it in!! UUGGGHH! > > ada > > WHEN I RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION, I CHECKED MY COMPUTER (FOLLOWING > THE DIRECTIONS BELOW) AND SURE ENOUGH, THERE IT WAS. PLEASE TAKE A FEW > MOMENTS TO READ THE FOLLOWING. I AM VERY CAREFUL NOT TO OPEN ATTACHMENTS > WITH A .EXE, BUT SOMEHOW THIS SNUCK THROUGH BOTH MCAFEE AND NORTON (WHICH > WOULD MAKE SENSE IF IT DOESN'T ACTIVATE ITSELF UNTIL JUNE 1). > > Subject: VIRUS TO DESTROY BEFORE IT ACTIVATES ON JUNE 1. NOT A JOKE! > IMPORTANT MESSAGE ABOUT A VIRUS!! PLEASE CHECK YOUR PC'S FOR IT! > Received the following from a friend. Please follow directions to find > and delete the file. Virus software cannot detect it. It will not become > active until June 1, 2001. At that point, it will become active and will > be too late. It wipes out all files and folders on the hard drive. This > virus travels through e-mail and migrates to the C:\windows\command folder. > To find it and delete it off your computer, do the following: > > Go to the START button. > Go to the FIND or SEARCH. > Go to FILES & FOLDERS. > Make sure the find box is searching the C drive. > Type in: SULFNBK.exe > Begin Search. > > If it finds it, highlight it and press the DELETE key on your keyboard. > Close the dialog box. Open the RECYCLE BIN. Find the file and delete > it from the Recycle bin. You should be safe. > > The bad part is: You need to contact everyone you have sent ANY e-mail > to in the past few months. I do not know how long this has been on our > computers. > DO NOT RELY ON YOUR ANTI-VIRUS SOFTWARE. MCAFEE NOR NORTON CAN DETECT > IT BECAUSE IT DOES NOT BECOME A VIRUS UNTIL JUNE 1ST.. IT WILL BE TOO > LATE THEN. WHATEVER YOU DO, DO NOT OPEN THE FILE!!!!!!! > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wes" <whays(at)camalott.com>
Subject: Virus Hoax SULFNBK.EXE
Date: May 30, 2001
Virus warning message a hoax. Sorry about that, I should have checked further. I am very embarrassed. Hope you did not follow the previous instructions. ----- Original Message ----- From: WINTER42TX(at)aol.com CHRISTJH(at)aaicorp.com ; jim1(at)brazosnet.com ; pascacio(at)nts-online.net ; efecryst(at)frii.com ; KMONROE(at)libertyhill.txed.net ; persuaderx(at)hotmail.com ; whays(at)camalott.com ; ndavis(at)swconnect.net ; rmande(at)onr.com ; mdlittle66(at)home.com ; stefnmike(at)home.com ; MaggyMcC(at)aol.com ; BMARKSDBM(at)aol.com ; Tjp525(at)cs.com ; wcpeek(at)concentric.net ; cpolley(at)pdq.net ; jrporter(at)cybertrails.com ; joe101352(at)hotmail.com ; Tondaland2001(at)aol.com ; ramey(at)herald.net ; jwrjr_99(at)yahoo.com ; Lacey(at)aol.com ; W5XJ(at)aol.com ; vogler(at)abilene.com ; kmw65(at)hotmail.com Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 1:18 PM Subject: Fwd: I found this on the internet, read and pass on I FOUND THIS OUT 5 MINUTES AFTER I DELETED THE FILE. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 30, 2001
From: "Boyd C. Braem" <bcbraem(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my
computer! Wait! What's the name of the virus. What systems does it attack? MSOutlook? Just PC's; ?Mac's. This sounds strange to find a virus in this fashion. Boyd Braem Wes wrote: > > > Folks, I received this message from a friend of mine. I checked my computer > and it was present. I have Norton virus protection and it got by it. > Supposedly gets by McAfee also. You may have gotten this from me so I am > forwarding this information to you. Check Quickly, the date of activation is > supposed to be June 1, 2001. The directions are below. > > Thanks. > Wes Hays > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Carolyn West" <ckjmwest(at)wtez.net> > To: > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 7:36 PM > Subject: Re: Fw: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer! > > > All, > > > > I received this from my Uncle, who received it from his daoughter-in-law > > who works in Washington, DC. I performed the search, found the supposedly > > infected file and deleted it. You may want to do the same. > > > > James > > > > > > I got this message from our daughterinlaw Ada who works in Wash.D.C.with > > computers & satalite comunications. I checked this info out on my computer > > and found it and got it out of the system..follow her directions and if > > you got it this should clear you > > ......good luck BEN > > ----- Original Message ----- > > Subject: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer! > > > > My e-mail is on the blink at work, but I received this e-mail from a > friend. > > Please check your computers! I did and found this virus. He did also. > > > > Since I can't forward his e-mail, I'm going to have to type it in!! > UUGGGHH! > > > > ada > > > > WHEN I RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION, I CHECKED MY COMPUTER > (FOLLOWING > > THE DIRECTIONS BELOW) AND SURE ENOUGH, THERE IT WAS. PLEASE TAKE A FEW > > MOMENTS TO READ THE FOLLOWING. I AM VERY CAREFUL NOT TO OPEN ATTACHMENTS > > WITH A .EXE, BUT SOMEHOW THIS SNUCK THROUGH BOTH MCAFEE AND NORTON (WHICH > > WOULD MAKE SENSE IF IT DOESN'T ACTIVATE ITSELF UNTIL JUNE 1). > > > > Subject: VIRUS TO DESTROY BEFORE IT ACTIVATES ON JUNE 1. NOT A JOKE! > > IMPORTANT MESSAGE ABOUT A VIRUS!! PLEASE CHECK YOUR PC'S FOR IT! > > Received the following from a friend. Please follow directions to find > > and delete the file. Virus software cannot detect it. It will not become > > active until June 1, 2001. At that point, it will become active and will > > be too late. It wipes out all files and folders on the hard drive. This > > virus travels through e-mail and migrates to the C:\windows\command > folder. > > To find it and delete it off your computer, do the following: > > > > Go to the START button. > > Go to the FIND or SEARCH. > > Go to FILES & FOLDERS. > > Make sure the find box is searching the C drive. > > Type in: SULFNBK.exe > > Begin Search. > > > > If it finds it, highlight it and press the DELETE key on your keyboard. > > Close the dialog box. Open the RECYCLE BIN. Find the file and delete > > it from the Recycle bin. You should be safe. > > > > The bad part is: You need to contact everyone you have sent ANY e-mail > > to in the past few months. I do not know how long this has been on our > > computers. > > DO NOT RELY ON YOUR ANTI-VIRUS SOFTWARE. MCAFEE NOR NORTON CAN DETECT > > IT BECAUSE IT DOES NOT BECOME A VIRUS UNTIL JUNE 1ST.. IT WILL BE TOO > > LATE THEN. WHATEVER YOU DO, DO NOT OPEN THE FILE!!!!!!! > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Van Artsdalen, Scott" <svanarts(at)unionsafe.com>
Subject: Type to build
Date: May 30, 2001
(Austin's great email deleted for brevity) Well put, Austin. I think the best thing a guy can do is decide for himself what he wants. What canopy design, what landing gear configuration, what primer, what instruments, what colors is all up to the builder. It seems like a lot to decide. Just look at all the RV's out there, pick your favorite, and build it. Don't worry about what anyone says about sliders, tailwheels, nosewheels, or colors. Build the plane YOU want. You'll always find someone who will say "Well I wouldn't have chosen that one" or "I wouldn't have done it that way." Doesn't matter because you are not building the plane for anyone but yourself. Go out there and build YOUR plane. And just for everyone's information, all the really cool guys are building RV-4's. It takes a helluva' pilot to shoehorn his fat butt into that skinny cockpit, deal with that aft CG tendancy, and toss his significant other kicking and screaming into the back seat. -- Scott (just wear your oxygen and climb to FL 150, she'll shut up eventually) VanArtsdalen, MCSE, CCNA Network Administrator Union Safe Deposit Bank 209-946-5116 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Are Barstad" <abarstad(at)sympatico.ca>
Subject: RE: RV-List Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer!
Date: May 30, 2001
This is a hoax! I know you didn't do this intentionally Wes but you should not have deleted this file. Here's a transcript from the Symantic website: "This particular email message is a hoax. The file that is mentioned in the hoax, however, Sulfnbk.exe, is a Microsoft Windows utility that is used to restore long file names, and like any .exe file, it can be infected by a virus that targets .exe files." Go here for more info and for info how to restore the file if you should have deleted it: http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/sulfnbk.exe.warning.html Are RV-8 Wings -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Wes Sent: May 30, 2001 7:43 PM Subject: RV-List: Fw: Fw: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer! Folks, I received this message from a friend of mine. I checked my computer and it was present. I have Norton virus protection and it got by it. Supposedly gets by McAfee also. You may have gotten this from me so I am forwarding this information to you. Check Quickly, the date of activation is supposed to be June 1, 2001. The directions are below. Thanks. Wes Hays ----- Original Message ----- From: "Carolyn West" <ckjmwest(at)wtez.net> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 7:36 PM Subject: Re: Fw: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer! > All, > > I received this from my Uncle, who received it from his daoughter-in-law > who works in Washington, DC. I performed the search, found the supposedly > infected file and deleted it. You may want to do the same. > > James > > > I got this message from our daughterinlaw Ada who works in Wash.D.C.with > computers & satalite comunications. I checked this info out on my computer > and found it and got it out of the system..follow her directions and if > you got it this should clear you > ......good luck BEN > ----- Original Message ----- > Subject: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer! > > My e-mail is on the blink at work, but I received this e-mail from a friend. > Please check your computers! I did and found this virus. He did also. > > Since I can't forward his e-mail, I'm going to have to type it in!! UUGGGHH! > > ada > > WHEN I RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION, I CHECKED MY COMPUTER (FOLLOWING > THE DIRECTIONS BELOW) AND SURE ENOUGH, THERE IT WAS. PLEASE TAKE A FEW > MOMENTS TO READ THE FOLLOWING. I AM VERY CAREFUL NOT TO OPEN ATTACHMENTS > WITH A .EXE, BUT SOMEHOW THIS SNUCK THROUGH BOTH MCAFEE AND NORTON (WHICH > WOULD MAKE SENSE IF IT DOESN'T ACTIVATE ITSELF UNTIL JUNE 1). > > Subject: VIRUS TO DESTROY BEFORE IT ACTIVATES ON JUNE 1. NOT A JOKE! > IMPORTANT MESSAGE ABOUT A VIRUS!! PLEASE CHECK YOUR PC'S FOR IT! > Received the following from a friend. Please follow directions to find > and delete the file. Virus software cannot detect it. It will not become > active until June 1, 2001. At that point, it will become active and will > be too late. It wipes out all files and folders on the hard drive. This > virus travels through e-mail and migrates to the C:\windows\command folder. > To find it and delete it off your computer, do the following: > > Go to the START button. > Go to the FIND or SEARCH. > Go to FILES & FOLDERS. > Make sure the find box is searching the C drive. > Type in: SULFNBK.exe > Begin Search. > > If it finds it, highlight it and press the DELETE key on your keyboard. > Close the dialog box. Open the RECYCLE BIN. Find the file and delete > it from the Recycle bin. You should be safe. > > The bad part is: You need to contact everyone you have sent ANY e-mail > to in the past few months. I do not know how long this has been on our > computers. > DO NOT RELY ON YOUR ANTI-VIRUS SOFTWARE. MCAFEE NOR NORTON CAN DETECT > IT BECAUSE IT DOES NOT BECOME A VIRUS UNTIL JUNE 1ST.. IT WILL BE TOO > LATE THEN. WHATEVER YOU DO, DO NOT OPEN THE FILE!!!!!!! > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Van Artsdalen, Scott" <svanarts(at)unionsafe.com>
Subject: Fw: Fw: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my c
omputer!
Date: May 30, 2001
From the Symantec site: This particular email message is a hoax. The file that is mentioned in the hoax, however, Sulfnbk.exe, is a Microsoft Windows utility that is used to restore long file names, and like any .exe file, it can be infected by a virus that targets .exe files. For more information go to: http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/sulfnbk.exe.warning.html <http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/sulfnbk.exe.warning.html> -- Scott VanArtsdalen, MCSE, CCNA Network Administrator Union Safe Deposit Bank 209-946-5116 -----Original Message----- From: Wes [mailto:whays(at)camalott.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 4:43 PM To: Undisclosed-Recipient:@mail.camalott.com; Subject: RV-List: Fw: Fw: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer! Folks, I received this message from a friend of mine. I checked my computer and it was present. I have Norton virus protection and it got by it. Supposedly gets by McAfee also. You may have gotten this from me so I am forwarding this information to you. Check Quickly, the date of activation is supposed to be June 1, 2001. The directions are below. Thanks. Wes Hays ----- Original Message ----- From: "Carolyn West" <ckjmwest(at)wtez.net> To: Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 7:36 PM Subject: Re: Fw: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer! > All, > > I received this from my Uncle, who received it from his daoughter-in-law > who works in Washington, DC. I performed the search, found the supposedly > infected file and deleted it. You may want to do the same. > > James > > > I got this message from our daughterinlaw Ada who works in Wash.D.C.with > computers & satalite comunications. I checked this info out on my computer > and found it and got it out of the system..follow her directions and if > you got it this should clear you > ......good luck BEN > ----- Original Message ----- > Subject: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer! > > My e-mail is on the blink at work, but I received this e-mail from a friend. > Please check your computers! I did and found this virus. He did also. > > Since I can't forward his e-mail, I'm going to have to type it in!! UUGGGHH! > > ada > > WHEN I RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION, I CHECKED MY COMPUTER (FOLLOWING > THE DIRECTIONS BELOW) AND SURE ENOUGH, THERE IT WAS. PLEASE TAKE A FEW > MOMENTS TO READ THE FOLLOWING. I AM VERY CAREFUL NOT TO OPEN ATTACHMENTS > WITH A .EXE, BUT SOMEHOW THIS SNUCK THROUGH BOTH MCAFEE AND NORTON (WHICH > WOULD MAKE SENSE IF IT DOESN'T ACTIVATE ITSELF UNTIL JUNE 1). > > Subject: VIRUS TO DESTROY BEFORE IT ACTIVATES ON JUNE 1. NOT A JOKE! > IMPORTANT MESSAGE ABOUT A VIRUS!! PLEASE CHECK YOUR PC'S FOR IT! > Received the following from a friend. Please follow directions to find > and delete the file. Virus software cannot detect it. It will not become > active until June 1, 2001. At that point, it will become active and will > be too late. It wipes out all files and folders on the hard drive. This > virus travels through e-mail and migrates to the C:\windows\command folder. > To find it and delete it off your computer, do the following: > > Go to the START button. > Go to the FIND or SEARCH. > Go to FILES & FOLDERS. > Make sure the find box is searching the C drive. > Type in: SULFNBK.exe > Begin Search. > > If it finds it, highlight it and press the DELETE key on your keyboard. > Close the dialog box. Open the RECYCLE BIN. Find the file and delete > it from the Recycle bin. You should be safe. > > The bad part is: You need to contact everyone you have sent ANY e-mail > to in the past few months. I do not know how long this has been on our > computers. > DO NOT RELY ON YOUR ANTI-VIRUS SOFTWARE. MCAFEE NOR NORTON CAN DETECT > IT BECAUSE IT DOES NOT BECOME A VIRUS UNTIL JUNE 1ST.. IT WILL BE TOO > LATE THEN. WHATEVER YOU DO, DO NOT OPEN THE FILE!!!!!!! > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 30, 2001
From: Jabe Luttrell <JabeLuttrell(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Rocket-List: Smoke Test
To prevent smoke: Before closing any breakers use an ohmmeter to measure the resistance of the load. Put one lead to ground and the other to the circuit breaker terminal; the one not connected to the bus. If the system voltage (e.g. 14vdc) divided by the measured resistance is greater than the circuit breaker trip rating, then you have a problem, but no smoke. Jabe Luttrell Tom Gummo wrote: > > --> Rocket-List message posted by: "Tom Gummo" > > Smoke Test > > Everybody knows that when you hook up electrical components for the first > time, there is a danger that something will go wrong and burn up the unit, > i.e., the smoke test. Strange popping sounds, funny smells and, of course, > smoke are signs that the smoke test has gone bad for you. > > As I know nothing about the electrical world (I know nothing about building > a plane either), I decided I needed help with wiring the rocket. My wife's > best friend's husband is an electrical engineer, Bud. One day in a moment > of weakness, Bud said that he would help with the wiring. I REALLY thought > it would be a couple of weekend project. Anyway, six months later, all the > wiring has been done and it is now time to test the system before connecting > the battery. Bud had a power supply with built-in protection so it was > thought that it would be better to use than the battery. It turns out the > 12 volt supply was generating over 15 volts (it can't be adjusted) so Bud > decided to use the battery after all. > > As a safety factor, he was using the "volt meter" inside the circuit and it > also measured the load of each unit. Anyway, as he was isolating another > unit to test, I hear "Oh Sh_t" and turn to see him jumping around try to > disconnect the meter and see smoke rising from the cockpit area. The whole > idea was to have a qualified person doing the wiring so that there would be > NO smoke or bad smells. The wires for the EGT and CHT sensors have a braded > metal outsides and he knocked them against a hot connection and sparks flew. > Hopefully, the only thing that got zapped was a very small gauge wire with > two clips which Bud was using to connect things together. > > After more testing, only the intercom doesn't work. Of course, it wasn't > working before the test either, so it may not be a victim of this event. As > Bud was leaving, he was heard to say, "I am really feeling DUMB." > > Back the hangar today to see if I can find a reason the intercom is not > working. Be careful put there. I think Bud is going to stay home. > > Tom Gummo > > Apple Valley, CA > > Doing all those last 90 percent things. > > HR-II N561FS (561 Fighter Squadron) reserved > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 30, 2001
From: Arthur Glaser <airplane(at)megsinet.net>
Subject: Re: RE: RV-List Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my
computer! ROXIO (WAS FROM ADAPTEC) HAS A PROGRAM THAT WILL RESTORE YOUR HARD DRIVE EVEN IF YOU HAVE TOTALLY DELETED A FILE AND EMPTIED THE RECYCLE BIN. IT IS CALLED "GOBACK" AND WORKS WELL. I JUST USED IT TO RESTORE THIS FILE TO MY HARD DRIVE AND IT WORKED PERFECTLY. Are Barstad wrote: > > This is a hoax! I know you didn't do this intentionally Wes but you should > not have deleted this file. Here's a transcript from the Symantic website: > > "This particular email message is a hoax. The file that is mentioned in the > hoax, however, Sulfnbk.exe, is a Microsoft Windows utility that is used to > restore long file names, and like any .exe file, it can be infected by a > virus that targets .exe files." > > Go here for more info and for info how to restore the file if you should > have deleted it: > http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/sulfnbk.exe.warning.html > > Are > RV-8 Wings > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Wes > Sent: May 30, 2001 7:43 PM > To: Undisclosed-Recipient:@mail.camalott.com; > Subject: RV-List: Fw: Fw: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my > computer! > > > Folks, I received this message from a friend of mine. I checked my computer > and it was present. I have Norton virus protection and it got by it. > Supposedly gets by McAfee also. You may have gotten this from me so I am > forwarding this information to you. Check Quickly, the date of activation is > supposed to be June 1, 2001. The directions are below. > > Thanks. > Wes Hays > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Carolyn West" <ckjmwest(at)wtez.net> > To: > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 7:36 PM > Subject: Re: Fw: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer! > > > All, > > > > I received this from my Uncle, who received it from his daoughter-in-law > > who works in Washington, DC. I performed the search, found the supposedly > > infected file and deleted it. You may want to do the same. > > > > James > > > > > > I got this message from our daughterinlaw Ada who works in Wash.D.C.with > > computers & satalite comunications. I checked this info out on my computer > > and found it and got it out of the system..follow her directions and if > > you got it this should clear you > > ......good luck BEN > > ----- Original Message ----- > > Subject: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer! > > > > My e-mail is on the blink at work, but I received this e-mail from a > friend. > > Please check your computers! I did and found this virus. He did also. > > > > Since I can't forward his e-mail, I'm going to have to type it in!! > UUGGGHH! > > > > ada > > > > WHEN I RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION, I CHECKED MY COMPUTER > (FOLLOWING > > THE DIRECTIONS BELOW) AND SURE ENOUGH, THERE IT WAS. PLEASE TAKE A FEW > > MOMENTS TO READ THE FOLLOWING. I AM VERY CAREFUL NOT TO OPEN ATTACHMENTS > > WITH A .EXE, BUT SOMEHOW THIS SNUCK THROUGH BOTH MCAFEE AND NORTON (WHICH > > WOULD MAKE SENSE IF IT DOESN'T ACTIVATE ITSELF UNTIL JUNE 1). > > > > Subject: VIRUS TO DESTROY BEFORE IT ACTIVATES ON JUNE 1. NOT A JOKE! > > IMPORTANT MESSAGE ABOUT A VIRUS!! PLEASE CHECK YOUR PC'S FOR IT! > > Received the following from a friend. Please follow directions to find > > and delete the file. Virus software cannot detect it. It will not become > > active until June 1, 2001. At that point, it will become active and will > > be too late. It wipes out all files and folders on the hard drive. This > > virus travels through e-mail and migrates to the C:\windows\command > folder. > > To find it and delete it off your computer, do the following: > > > > Go to the START button. > > Go to the FIND or SEARCH. > > Go to FILES & FOLDERS. > > Make sure the find box is searching the C drive. > > Type in: SULFNBK.exe > > Begin Search. > > > > If it finds it, highlight it and press the DELETE key on your keyboard. > > Close the dialog box. Open the RECYCLE BIN. Find the file and delete > > it from the Recycle bin. You should be safe. > > > > The bad part is: You need to contact everyone you have sent ANY e-mail > > to in the past few months. I do not know how long this has been on our > > computers. > > DO NOT RELY ON YOUR ANTI-VIRUS SOFTWARE. MCAFEE NOR NORTON CAN DETECT > > IT BECAUSE IT DOES NOT BECOME A VIRUS UNTIL JUNE 1ST.. IT WILL BE TOO > > LATE THEN. WHATEVER YOU DO, DO NOT OPEN THE FILE!!!!!!! > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wes" <whays(at)camalott.com>
Subject: Virus Hoax SULFNBK.EXE
Date: May 30, 2001
I guess this message didn't get to the RV list. I forgot to remove the attachment. Sorry guys. Its bogus and I am very embarrassed. Wes Subject: [eaa19] Virus Hoax SULFNBK.EXE Virus warning message a hoax. Sorry about that, I should have checked further. I am very embarrassed. Hope you did not follow the previous instructions. ----- Original Message ----- From: WINTER42TX(at)aol.com CHRISTJH(at)aaicorp.com ; jim1(at)brazosnet.com ; pascacio(at)nts-online.net ; efecryst(at)frii.com ; KMONROE(at)libertyhill.txed.net ; persuaderx(at)hotmail.com ; whays(at)camalott.com ; ndavis(at)swconnect.net ; rmande(at)onr.com ; mdlittle66(at)home.com ; stefnmike(at)home.com ; MaggyMcC(at)aol.com ; BMARKSDBM(at)aol.com ; Tjp525(at)cs.com ; wcpeek(at)concentric.net ; cpolley(at)pdq.net ; jrporter(at)cybertrails.com ; joe101352(at)hotmail.com ; Tondaland2001(at)aol.com ; ramey(at)herald.net ; jwrjr_99(at)yahoo.com ; Lacey(at)aol.com ; W5XJ(at)aol.com ; vogler(at)abilene.com ; kmw65(at)hotmail.com Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 1:18 PM Subject: Fwd: I found this on the internet, read and pass on I FOUND THIS OUT 5 MINUTES AFTER I DELETED THE FILE. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: eaa19-unsubscribe(at)egroups.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wes" <whays(at)camalott.com>
Subject: Fw: Fw: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer!
Date: May 30, 2001
Thanks Eric. I tried to notify as soon as I found out. Sorry about the false alarm. I am very embarrassed. Looked like I "screwed the pooch" this time. Wes ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Irwin" <erici(at)bigfoot.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 6:58 PM Subject: RE: RV-List: Fw: Fw: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer! > You should read the following article on the Norton Anitvirus web site. The > message you forwarded is a hoax. You might want to tell the list before > they all go deleting that file. > > http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/sulfnbk.exe.warning.html > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Wes > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 7:43 PM > To: Undisclosed-Recipient:@mail.camalott.com; > Subject: RV-List: Fw: Fw: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my > computer! > > > Folks, I received this message from a friend of mine. I checked my computer > and it was present. I have Norton virus protection and it got by it. > Supposedly gets by McAfee also. You may have gotten this from me so I am > forwarding this information to you. Check Quickly, the date of activation is > supposed to be June 1, 2001. The directions are below. > > Thanks. > Wes Hays > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Carolyn West" <ckjmwest(at)wtez.net> > To: > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 7:36 PM > Subject: Re: Fw: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer! > > > > All, > > > > I received this from my Uncle, who received it from his daoughter-in-law > > who works in Washington, DC. I performed the search, found the supposedly > > infected file and deleted it. You may want to do the same. > > > > James > > > > > > I got this message from our daughterinlaw Ada who works in Wash.D.C.with > > computers & satalite comunications. I checked this info out on my computer > > and found it and got it out of the system..follow her directions and if > > you got it this should clear you > > ......good luck BEN > > ----- Original Message ----- > > Subject: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer! > > > > My e-mail is on the blink at work, but I received this e-mail from a > friend. > > Please check your computers! I did and found this virus. He did also. > > > > Since I can't forward his e-mail, I'm going to have to type it in!! > UUGGGHH! > > > > ada > > > > WHEN I RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION, I CHECKED MY COMPUTER > (FOLLOWING > > THE DIRECTIONS BELOW) AND SURE ENOUGH, THERE IT WAS. PLEASE TAKE A FEW > > MOMENTS TO READ THE FOLLOWING. I AM VERY CAREFUL NOT TO OPEN ATTACHMENTS > > WITH A .EXE, BUT SOMEHOW THIS SNUCK THROUGH BOTH MCAFEE AND NORTON (WHICH > > WOULD MAKE SENSE IF IT DOESN'T ACTIVATE ITSELF UNTIL JUNE 1). > > > > Subject: VIRUS TO DESTROY BEFORE IT ACTIVATES ON JUNE 1. NOT A JOKE! > > IMPORTANT MESSAGE ABOUT A VIRUS!! PLEASE CHECK YOUR PC'S FOR IT! > > Received the following from a friend. Please follow directions to find > > and delete the file. Virus software cannot detect it. It will not become > > active until June 1, 2001. At that point, it will become active and will > > be too late. It wipes out all files and folders on the hard drive. This > > virus travels through e-mail and migrates to the C:\windows\command > folder. > > To find it and delete it off your computer, do the following: > > > > Go to the START button. > > Go to the FIND or SEARCH. > > > Go to FILES & FOLDERS. > > Make sure the find box is searching the C drive. > > Type in: SULFNBK.exe > > Begin Search. > > > > If it finds it, highlight it and press the DELETE key on your keyboard. > > Close the dialog box. Open the RECYCLE BIN. Find the file and delete > > it from the Recycle bin. You should be safe. > > > > The bad part is: You need to contact everyone you have sent ANY e-mail > > to in the past few months. I do not know how long this has been on our > > computers. > > DO NOT RELY ON YOUR ANTI-VIRUS SOFTWARE. MCAFEE NOR NORTON CAN DETECT > > IT BECAUSE IT DOES NOT BECOME A VIRUS UNTIL JUNE 1ST.. IT WILL BE TOO > > LATE THEN. WHATEVER YOU DO, DO NOT OPEN THE FILE!!!!!!! > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 30, 2001
From: Dave Bristol <bj034(at)lafn.org>
Subject: Re: c/s prop techniques
Manifold pressure is absolute pressure measured from sea level. Vacuum is measured from the ambient pressure at your altitude. Therefore you can determine % power from manifold pressure and RPM but if you were using vacuum, altitude would also have to be considered. Dave kempthornes wrote: > > Jody Villa discombobulates my poor mind with: > > >It's really manifold vacuum not pressure. > > I wondered about that during my training too. I used to have a truck with a > vacuum gauge. It went highest when decelerating. When I stomped the > throttle the vac would go down to a few inches. > > Surely MAP is not an accurate way to determine power being output as it is > very high with the engine shut off. Maybe it just measures atmospheric > pressure (29.92 on a standard day) inside the manifold. Hopefully during > operation the MAP gauge shows a value less than the barometric pressure. > At full power the difference is just a few inches. > > My head hurts, back to Java. > > Hal Kempthorne > RV6a N7HK (Valentine) FLYING > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Sam Cherroff" <sam(at)videoassist.com>
Date: May 30, 2001
Subject: Re: Smoke Test
Someone once told me that the way electronics works is that the little copper wires have smoke traveling through them and that all of the little components process the smoke in various ways like valves to acheive the desired results. When things malfunction, the wires rupture and the smoke leaks out rendering the circuit useless. (true story). --Sam > > Smoke Test > > Everybody knows that when you hook up electrical components for the first > time, there is a danger that something will go wrong and burn up the unit, > i.e., the smoke test. Strange popping sounds, funny smells and, of course, > smoke are signs that the smoke test has gone bad for you. > > As I know nothing about the electrical world (I know nothing about building > a plane either), I decided I needed help with wiring the rocket. My wife's > best friend's husband is an electrical engineer, Bud. One day in a moment > of weakness, Bud said that he would help with the wiring. I REALLY thought > it would be a couple of weekend project. Anyway, six months later, all the > wiring has been done and it is now time to test the system before connecting > the battery. Bud had a power supply with built-in protection so it was > thought that it would be better to use than the battery. It turns out the > 12 volt supply was generating over 15 volts (it can't be adjusted) so Bud > decided to use the battery after all. > > As a safety factor, he was using the "volt meter" inside the circuit and it > also measured the load of each unit. Anyway, as he was isolating another > unit to test, I hear "Oh Sh_t" and turn to see him jumping around try to > disconnect the meter and see smoke rising from the cockpit area. The whole > idea was to have a qualified person doing the wiring so that there would be > NO smoke or bad smells. The wires for the EGT and CHT sensors have a braded > metal outsides and he knocked them against a hot connection and sparks flew. > Hopefully, the only thing that got zapped was a very small gauge wire with > two clips which Bud was using to connect things together. > > After more testing, only the intercom doesn't work. Of course, it wasn't > working before the test either, so it may not be a victim of this event. As > Bud was leaving, he was heard to say, "I am really feeling DUMB." > > Back the hangar today to see if I can find a reason the intercom is not > working. Be careful put there. I think Bud is going to stay home. > > > Tom Gummo > > Apple Valley, CA > > Doing all those last 90 percent things. > > HR-II N561FS (561 Fighter Squadron) reserved > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 30, 2001
From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: Builder profile/AOPA
Read this page and then decide if AOPA doesn't reflect OUR interests: http://www.aopa.org/advocacy/ I am a member of AOPA because it is the strongest voice we have against those in Washington D.C. who would like to legislate our RVs out of existence. The magazine is just a bonus. :-) Sam Buchanan (RV-6) "The RV Journal" http://hoem.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal ==================== "Van Artsdalen, Scott" wrote: > > > I stopped subscribing to AOPA Pilot because AOPA really doesn't reflect my > interests. Reading Malibu flight reports are only mildly interesting to me. > Learning about the latest Cessna that I can't afford is only less mildly > interesting. That's why I joined EAA. I am supporting an organization that > supports GA and is geared more toward my interests. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 30, 2001
From: Dave Bristol <bj034(at)lafn.org>
Subject: Re: Cowl Hinge Pins
ACS does NOT carry the 1/8" pin. I already checked. Dave Charlie and Tupper England wrote: > > So does your friendly local welding supply. (stainless > welding rod) > > ray sheffield wrote: > > > > > > You may want to use stainless steel, I think spruce sells them. > > > > ray rv6a > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <ENewton57(at)aol.com> > > To: > > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 8:22 PM > > Subject: RV-List: Cowl Hinge Pins > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > My question is regarding the 1/8" hinge pins for the cowl. They seem very > > > flexible and soft. When you bend them even slightly, they stay bent. > > They > > > obviously are not made out of the same material as the other hinge which > > are > > > very stiff and springy. Are they made from a different material? Seems > > kind > > > of weak to me. They bend fairly easy while I try to push them into the > > > hinges and seem to be getting distorted somewhat. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Eric Newton - Long Beach, Mississippi > > > RV-6A N57ME (Reserved) (Engine Cowling) > > > http://www.ericsrv6a.com > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kevin Schlosser" <kevinschlosser(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Canopy / LG Type, Etc.
Date: May 30, 2001
What about height clearance in the two canopy styles? ----- Original Message ----- From: Kevin Schlosser Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 4:57 PM Subject: RV-List: Canopy / LG Type, Etc. [snip] Kevin Schlosser -< PropellerHead >- Future RV-7 Builder I haven't been this jazzed since the last day of school as a kid! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bruno" <fo320(at)sympatico.ca>
Subject: Rv-4 Propeller
Date: May 31, 2001
Hello everyone I'm in the market for a new prop and I was wondreing if anyone on the list know anything about a guy name "Colin Walker" in Vancouver B.C who is selling props. Any infos on how to contact him and comments about his work are welcome. Also infos on spinner assy that will fit a RV-4 and where to buy them will be appreciated. Thanks in advance Bruno Dionne Grounded RV-4 C-GDBH fo320(at)sympatico.ca ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Svajda" <dsvajda(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Virus Hoax SULFNBK.EXE
Date: May 30, 2001
Don't know who started this hoax but it's clever. I got an email telling me to search my hard drive for the SULFNBK.exe file. I was told it was part of the "Snow White" virus and to delete it and then clean it out of my recycle bin. I got a little suspicious since I found it in my Command folder and it had a Windows logo attached. I searched my Windows ME CD and found the string SULFNBK in two files. The file pertains to backing up long file names. I wonder how the system would work if I deleted as directed. Dave Svajda RV 6 wings(still) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wes" <whays(at)camalott.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 7:30 PM Subject: RV-List: Virus Hoax SULFNBK.EXE > > I guess this message didn't get to the RV list. I forgot to remove the > attachment. Sorry guys. Its bogus and I am very embarrassed. > Wes > > Subject: [eaa19] Virus Hoax SULFNBK.EXE > > > Virus warning message a hoax. Sorry about that, I should have checked > further. I am very embarrassed. Hope you did not follow the previous > instructions. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: WINTER42TX(at)aol.com > To: butcherbears(at)yahoo.com ; Carrelldav(at)aol.com ; tamern(at)home.com ; > CHRISTJH(at)aaicorp.com ; jim1(at)brazosnet.com ; pascacio(at)nts-online.net ; > efecryst(at)frii.com ; KMONROE(at)libertyhill.txed.net ; > persuaderx(at)hotmail.com ; whays(at)camalott.com ; ndavis(at)swconnect.net ; > rmande(at)onr.com ; mdlittle66(at)home.com ; stefnmike(at)home.com ; > MaggyMcC(at)aol.com ; BMARKSDBM(at)aol.com ; Tjp525(at)cs.com ; > wcpeek(at)concentric.net ; cpolley(at)pdq.net ; jrporter(at)cybertrails.com ; > joe101352(at)hotmail.com ; Tondaland2001(at)aol.com ; ramey(at)herald.net ; > jwrjr_99(at)yahoo.com ; Lacey(at)aol.com ; W5XJ(at)aol.com ; vogler(at)abilene.com ; > kmw65(at)hotmail.com > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 1:18 PM > Subject: Fwd: I found this on the internet, read and pass on > > > I FOUND THIS OUT 5 MINUTES AFTER I DELETED THE FILE. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > eaa19-unsubscribe(at)egroups.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Meketa" <acgm(at)gvtc.com>
Subject: Re: Builder profile/AOPA
Date: May 30, 2001
Hello Yall I agree with Sam on the AOPA issue. I am a member solely to give them support for the support they give us. They are our main lobbying voice in D.C. We need all the help we can get. Private Pilot magazine, EAA, AOPA, RVator, RV-list and the International 120/140 Association are the ones for me. See you at Cougar landing. George Meketa RV8 finishing, all wiring done and ready for the canopy. > I am a member of AOPA because it is the strongest voice we have against > those in Washington D.C. who would like to legislate our RVs out of > existence. > > The magazine is just a bonus. :-) > > Sam Buchanan (RV-6) > "The RV Journal" http://hoem.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: May 31, 2001
Subject: Re: Rv-4 Propeller
In a message dated 5/30/01 9:19:01 PM Pacific Daylight Time, fo320(at)sympatico.ca writes: << I'm in the market for a new prop and I was wondering if anyone on the list know anything about a guy name "Colin Walker" in Vancouver B.C who is selling props. Any infos on how to contact him and comments about his work are welcome. >> Colin Walker can be reached at 604-591-9602. -GV (RV-6A N1GV) vanremog(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stephen J. Soule" <SSoule(at)pfclaw.com>
Subject: Question #17625437236....
Date: May 31, 2001
Daniel, Prime first then rivet. You want to get the primer between the pieces where water can be trapped and corrosion can start. Store your empenage in the new apartment and bring it outside to work on a portable table made of a piece of plywood on two sawhorses. You will impress your neighbors. Steve Soule Huntington, Vermont RV-6A almost done ... for 6 months now -----Original Message-----Is it OK to rivet th stifeners then prime my elevators?..or I MUST prime everything and the after rivet..thanks BTW, My project will be waiting for a while cause my wife and me have bought a new departament, so I must use some of the money to dress the house...The departament is so small tha even the empenage will be dificult to build the wings...I must seek some person wich can make the job for me... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wes" <whays(at)camalott.com>
Subject: Re: Virus Hoax SULFNBK.EXE
Date: May 31, 2001
I don't know David, but since I perpetuated the hoax, I now have mine replaced. If anyone needs to get theirs back, please e-mail privately and I will forward it to you. Wes. whays(at)camalott.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Parker43rp(at)aol.com
Date: May 31, 2001
Subject: Re: Cowl Hinge Pins
Why don't you buy the 1/8" pins from Van's? Ray ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Johnny Johnson" <Johnny(at)wiktel.com>
Subject: Constant speed props
Date: May 31, 2001
Eric mentioned: >> almost pronged a T-34 on go around trying to >> remember "now let me see, is it throttle-prop >> or prop-throttle in go around mode." Finally >> just shoved everything at the same time. Back in the Dark Ages when the Navy was teaching me to fly, the thing I used as a memory-jogger was "go uphill going up, downhill coming down"... if you will notice in a single-engine throttle quadrant, the throttle lever is generally longest, prop is next to it and mid-length, and the mixture is the shortie. So... when adding power start with the shortest and go uphill: Mixture, prop, throttle. Pulling power start with the longest and go downhill: throttle, prop, mixture. If you don't have a quadrant... well, my heart goes out to you.. :=)) The concept is to get the mixture richer and the rpm up before adding a lot of manifold pressure... get the manifold pressure off before reducing rpm or leaning a bunch. Detonation is the thing we're trying to avoid... Hal, I hope those instructors that told you the prop and engine turned at different speeds understood aerodynamics better than they understood powerplants... :=)) Johnny Johnson 49MM -3 flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ENewton57(at)aol.com
Date: May 31, 2001
Subject: Re: Question #17625437236....
In a message dated 5/30/01 10:13:23 PM Central Daylight Time, dani_estrada(at)infosel.net.mx writes: << Is it ok to rivet th stifeners then prime my elevators?..or I MUST prime everything and the after rivet..thanks >> Hi Daniel, I primed the stiffeners and inside elevator skins where the stiffeners touch the skins before riveting. Happy Building, Eric Newton - Long Beach, Mississippi RV-6A N57ME (Reserved) (Engine Cowling) http://www.ericsrv6a.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Donald Mei" <don_mei(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: re RV-4 tailwheel springs
Date: May 31, 2001
Just a heads up. If your RV4 kit came with an aluminum tailwheel steering horn, there is a service bulliten to replace it with a steel one. Vans will send it for free. Don Mei ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stan Blanton" <stanb(at)door.net>
Subject: Re: cheap fuel in Missouri?
Date: May 31, 2001
> we were planning on a fuel stop somewhere in > central/southwest Missouri. I checked airnav.com and their site is down > until June 11...could someone point me out to another fuel-price site or > point me to the FBO's/airports who serve cheap go-juice in Missouri? > > Bob Japundza > snip I've had good luck stopping at Neosho, MO (EOS) about 30 mi. south of Joplin. Fuel was $1.80 there last summer on the way to Oshkosh compared to $2.80 at Spirit-St. Louis. Stan Blanton RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Van Artsdalen, Scott" <svanarts(at)unionsafe.com>
Subject: Fw: Fw: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my c
omputer!
Date: May 31, 2001
Well, at least give the pooch a call the next day, maybe send some flowers or something. Then move on and keep building! -- Scott VanArtsdalen, MCSE, CCNA Network Administrator Union Safe Deposit Bank 209-946-5116 -----Original Message----- From: Wes [mailto:whays(at)camalott.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 6:28 PM To: rv-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Fw: RV-List: Fw: Fw: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer! Thanks Eric. I tried to notify as soon as I found out. Sorry about the false alarm. I am very embarrassed. Looked like I "screwed the pooch" this time. Wes ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Irwin" <erici(at)bigfoot.com> To: Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 6:58 PM Subject: RE: RV-List: Fw: Fw: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer! > You should read the following article on the Norton Anitvirus web site. The > message you forwarded is a hoax. You might want to tell the list before > they all go deleting that file. > > http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/sulfnbk.exe.warning.html > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Wes > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 7:43 PM > To: Undisclosed-Recipient:@mail.camalott.com; > Subject: RV-List: Fw: Fw: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my > computer! > > > > Folks, I received this message from a friend of mine. I checked my computer > and it was present. I have Norton virus protection and it got by it. > Supposedly gets by McAfee also. You may have gotten this from me so I am > forwarding this information to you. Check Quickly, the date of activation is > supposed to be June 1, 2001. The directions are below. > > Thanks. > Wes Hays > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Carolyn West" <ckjmwest(at)wtez.net> > To: > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 7:36 PM > Subject: Re: Fw: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer! > > > > All, > > > > I received this from my Uncle, who received it from his daoughter-in-law > > who works in Washington, DC. I performed the search, found the supposedly > > infected file and deleted it. You may want to do the same. > > > > James > > > > > > I got this message from our daughterinlaw Ada who works in Wash.D.C.with > > computers & satalite comunications. I checked this info out on my computer > > and found it and got it out of the system..follow her directions and if > > you got it this should clear you > > ......good luck BEN > > ----- Original Message ----- > > Subject: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!! I found it on my computer! > > > > My e-mail is on the blink at work, but I received this e-mail from a > friend. > > Please check your computers! I did and found this virus. He did also. > > > > Since I can't forward his e-mail, I'm going to have to type it in!! > UUGGGHH! > > > > ada > > > > WHEN I RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION, I CHECKED MY COMPUTER > (FOLLOWING > > THE DIRECTIONS BELOW) AND SURE ENOUGH, THERE IT WAS. PLEASE TAKE A FEW > > MOMENTS TO READ THE FOLLOWING. I AM VERY CAREFUL NOT TO OPEN ATTACHMENTS > > WITH A .EXE, BUT SOMEHOW THIS SNUCK THROUGH BOTH MCAFEE AND NORTON (WHICH > > WOULD MAKE SENSE IF IT DOESN'T ACTIVATE ITSELF UNTIL JUNE 1). > > > > Subject: VIRUS TO DESTROY BEFORE IT ACTIVATES ON JUNE 1. NOT A JOKE! > > IMPORTANT MESSAGE ABOUT A VIRUS!! PLEASE CHECK YOUR PC'S FOR IT! > > Received the following from a friend. Please follow directions to find > > and delete the file. Virus software cannot detect it. It will not become > > active until June 1, 2001. At that point, it will become active and will > > be too late. It wipes out all files and folders on the hard drive. This > > virus travels through e-mail and migrates to the C:\windows\command > folder. > > To find it and delete it off your computer, do the following: > > > > Go to the START button. > > Go to the FIND or SEARCH. > > > Go to FILES & FOLDERS. > > Make sure the find box is searching the C drive. > > Type in: SULFNBK.exe > > Begin Search. > > > > If it finds it, highlight it and press the DELETE key on your keyboard. > > Close the dialog box. Open the RECYCLE BIN. Find the file and delete > > it from the Recycle bin. You should be safe. > > > > The bad part is: You need to contact everyone you have sent ANY e-mail > > to in the past few months. I do not know how long this has been on our > > computers. > > DO NOT RELY ON YOUR ANTI-VIRUS SOFTWARE. MCAFEE NOR NORTON CAN DETECT > > IT BECAUSE IT DOES NOT BECOME A VIRUS UNTIL JUNE 1ST.. IT WILL BE TOO > > LATE THEN. WHATEVER YOU DO, DO NOT OPEN THE FILE!!!!!!! > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Alison and Neil McLeod" <bedrock(at)theriver.com>
Subject: AFS paint/primer systems
Date: May 31, 2001
Anybody out there have experience with the AFS (Aircraft Finishing Systems) stuff, specificly the primer sealer and 2 part polyurethane topcoat. If so I'd like to know how you prepped and what type equipment you used. Thanks Neil McLeod -7 emp ________________________________________________________________________________
From: N188sm(at)cs.com
Date: May 31, 2001
Subject: Re: cheap fuel in Missouri?
Cuba Mo. UBX. 15 miles east of Rolla. Stan ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "alex strickland" <alexs737(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Removal from list
Date: May 31, 2001
Please remove me from the list, Thanks ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Rocket-List: Smoke Test
From: Scott.Fink(at)microchip.com
Date: May 31, 2001
05/31/2001 08:42:27 AM, Serialize complete at 05/31/2001 08:42:27 AM Good technique to catch greivous wiring errors Jabe! Don't, however, assume that if the resistance reads high enough that everything is fine and get complacent. If you are using an ohmmeter it may not forward bias any diodes in the circuit that may be backwards (forwards? depends how you look at it) that may smoke when you apply full power, as one example of problems that wouldn't necessarily show up. Definately do this test first, just be ready to turn off the circuit when you first apply power. Scott Fink RV6 To prevent smoke: Before closing any breakers use an ohmmeter to measure the resistance of the load. Put one lead to ground and the other to the circuit breaker terminal; the one not connected to the bus. If the system voltage (e.g. 14vdc) divided by the measured resistance is greater than the circuit breaker trip rating, then you have a problem, but no smoke. Jabe Luttrell Tom Gummo wrote: > > --> Rocket-List message posted by: "Tom Gummo" > > Smoke Test > > Everybody knows that when you hook up electrical components for the first > time, there is a danger that something will go wrong and burn up the unit, > i.e., the smoke test. Strange popping sounds, funny smells and, of course, > smoke are signs that the smoke test has gone bad for you. > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 31, 2001
From: "Owens, Laird" <Owens(at)aerovironment.com>
Subject: cheap fuel in NM
While were on the subject of cheap fuel.... While on the way/and back to the Bahamas last week, I stopped at Saint Johns in New Mexico and got gas at $1.93. Best price I had all week. Sure beat the $3.50 on the islands. I've yet to write the trip report on the Bahamas trip, but it was a blast. I'll post the report as soon as I get it written. Quite an adventure. (Right Gary?) Laird (bug bites are almost gone) RV-6, 250 hrs O-360, Hartzell Simi Valley, SoCal ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 31, 2001
From: Steve Judd <sjudd(at)ffd2.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: Real Virus - NOT A JOKE!!
I found it on my computer!) Hola, This is a hoax. The file to be deleted is part of the Windows operating system (handles long filenames and such). If you delete it, you will have to restore the file to get a functioning system again -- big pain in the butt. In this case the user deletes the file, instead of a computer program. Remember the golden rule: almost everything forwarded in email is fake. If it has LOTS OF CAPITAL LETTERS, it's a fake. If it doesn't have any references, it's a fake. If it doesn't have credible references -- if you can't go to the CERT website and read about the "virus" yourself -- it's a fake. Always take a few minutes with Google to check on any forwarded email 'WARNING!!!' or 'IMPORTANT GOVERNMENT ACTION!!!' or any email that advises you to take action -- because chances are pretty much 100% that it's a hoax. Typing in 'sulfnbk.exe' at www.google.com gives a zillion links. For real virus notifications, one option is the CERT mailing list at http://www.cert.org (look under the "CERT contact information" link). Probably Norton and Symantec have notification lists too. Good luck, -Steve On Wed, 30 May 2001, Wes wrote: > > Folks, I received this message from a friend of mine. I checked my computer > and it was present. I have Norton virus protection and it got by it. > Supposedly gets by McAfee also. You may have gotten this from me so I am > forwarding this information to you. Check Quickly, the date of activation is > supposed to be June 1, 2001. The directions are below. > > Thanks. > Wes Hays ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis /Fran Flamini" <flamini2(at)home.com>
Subject: Fw: Tailwind-List: Roy Adams Update
Date: May 31, 2001
i am forwarding this to the RV list as there are more listers and we all need to be aware that this could happen to us. If you could help, i am sure Debra and Roy would appreciate it. Dennis Flamini, Chicago ----- Original Message ----- From: <RussMyrs2(at)aol.com> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 12:24 AM Subject: Re: Tailwind-List: Roy Adams Update > --> Tailwind-List message posted by: RussMyrs2(at)aol.com > > Roy Adams has been a subscriber to the Tailwind list for a while now. He didn't start or finish his day until he could sit at the computer and "absorb" the excitement of other owners. As many of you know, he was critically injured when his Tailwind crashed and burned on May 22. The other pilot, who was giving him a CFI lesson, died 48 hours later. He is currently at Memorial Hermann Hospital Burn Unit in Houston, TX. His condition remains critical, however, I believe he will survive this horrendous accident. He is burned over 80% of his body...mostly 3rd degree. He has lost his right leg, below the knee and they have started grafting skin. The doctors are now talking to me about the viability of his left leg. He is on a respirator and in a comatose state mostly because of the medications for pain. His friends in this small community where he grew up, have opened an account in his name to help with his expenses. > The name of the bank is "First Community Bank of Alvin". > I have heard from many of you who would like to do something. Also, those who are able, may donate blood. He has required about 14 units so far and I'm told this is "just the beginning". > Thank you for all the prayers and phone calls. I can see the answers to prayer on a daily basis as we enter day 9 and he is still with us. I know that God's hand is upon him. > > Debra Adams > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Looking in the Scrap bin
Date: May 31, 2001
Fellow listers, I need a piece of 6061-T6 extruded aluminum alloy, 1" x 1" x .063 thick about 8 inches long to replace an autopilot roll servo bracket that I've missdrilled. Anyone have anything like this in their scrap bin? I'll pay for it if necessary - just don't want to pay minimums and cutting fees which could make this not worth while... Thanks, Ralph Capen ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Nellis" <mnellis(at)peoplepc.com>
Subject: Re: cheap fuel in NM
Date: May 31, 2001
Hey Laird, Weren't you also going to write a recap of the differences between your fixed pitch and the new CS prop? Did I miss it or are you two busy strafing birds, for revenge, to write it up. Mike Nellis Plainfield, IL RV6 N699BM (res) Building Flaps Stinson 108-2 N9666K ----- Original Message ----- From: "Owens, Laird" <Owens(at)aerovironment.com> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 10:58 AM Subject: RE: RV-List: cheap fuel in NM > > While were on the subject of cheap fuel.... > > While on the way/and back to the Bahamas last week, I stopped at Saint Johns in New Mexico and got gas at $1.93. Best price I had all week. Sure beat the $3.50 on the islands. > > I've yet to write the trip report on the Bahamas trip, but it was a blast. I'll post the report as soon as I get it written. Quite an adventure. (Right Gary?) > > Laird (bug bites are almost gone) > RV-6, 250 hrs > O-360, Hartzell > Simi Valley, SoCal > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Parker43rp(at)aol.com
Date: May 31, 2001
Subject: Thickness of f-804 spacers---RV-8
RV-8 builders-- The building instructions for the RV-8 say to make spacers for the wing spar slots in bulkhead f-804 out of wood material exactly the thickness of the spar ends. Wood is not all that stable being susceptible varying changes in thickness with the addition of moisture or when subjected to pressure. I wonder what others have done here and what experiences you have encountered in building this part of the "8". I have milled the spacers in aluminum allowing about 0.010" oversize from the dimension of 1.440" for the spar bars. To those "that have been there" -- is that enough or more than enough clearance to insert the spar? --or too much clearance to take up in tightening the bolts? Ray Parker ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 31, 2001
From: Ken Balch <kbalch1(at)mediaone.net>
Subject: Re: Thickness of f-804 spacers---RV-8
Hi Ray, I used milled steel spacers .005" over the nominal spar thickness. I can't say whether .010" is too much clearance to be taken up by torqued bolts, but my wing spars went right in and fit perfectly, even before the bolts were tightened. -- Regards, Ken Balch Ashland, MA RV-8 #81125 (N118KB) fabricating fuel & vent lines groups.yahoo.com/group/BostonRVBuilders/files/ Parker43rp(at)aol.com wrote: > RV-8 builders-- The building instructions for the RV-8 say to make spacers > for the wing spar slots in bulkhead f-804 out of wood material exactly the > thickness of the spar ends. Wood is not all that stable being susceptible > varying changes in thickness with the addition of moisture or when subjected > to pressure. I wonder what others have done here and what experiences you > have encountered in building this part of the "8". > I have milled the spacers in aluminum allowing about 0.010" oversize from > the dimension of 1.440" for the spar bars. To those "that have been there" > -- is that enough or more than enough clearance to insert the spar? --or too > much clearance to take up in tightening the bolts? > > Ray Parker ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 31, 2001
From: Bill VonDane <bvondane(at)cso.atmel.com>
Subject: Thickness of f-804 spacers---RV-8
What happens if you get to putting the wings on and they wont go in? I have not tried it yet, and I put spacers in, but was wondering if this has happened... -Bill -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Ken Balch Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 12:53 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Thickness of f-804 spacers---RV-8 Hi Ray, I used milled steel spacers .005" over the nominal spar thickness. I can't say whether .010" is too much clearance to be taken up by torqued bolts, but my wing spars went right in and fit perfectly, even before the bolts were tightened. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 31, 2001
From: Ken Balch <kbalch1(at)mediaone.net>
Subject: Re: Thickness of f-804 spacers---RV-8
Hey Bill, A short note and a quick bullet. That was my plan if my wings didn't fit. Just kidding...but it would've been a BAD, BAD day. FWIW, I spoke with Tom Green about this and he said that he's never heard of a set of wings where the rear spars failed to match up with the fuselage bars. I didn't ask about the main spars failing to fit. In the -8 (and presumably also the -7 & the -9A), there are so many pre-punched holes that dictate the position of both halves of the -804, that I'd be surprised if any tiny builder-induced variations couldn't be accommodated. Ken Bill VonDane wrote: > > What happens if you get to putting the wings on and they wont go in? I have > not tried it yet, and I put spacers in, but was wondering if this has > happened... > > -Bill > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Ken Balch > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 12:53 PM > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: Thickness of f-804 spacers---RV-8 > > > Hi Ray, > > I used milled steel spacers .005" over the nominal spar thickness. I can't > say > whether .010" is too much clearance to be taken up by torqued bolts, but my > wing > spars went right in and fit perfectly, even before the bolts were tightened. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Nellis" <mnellis(at)peoplepc.com>
Subject: Re: Logbook
Date: May 31, 2001
Check out Chris Goods builders log. He used an excel spreadsheet that's pretty basic and gets the job done. Should be easy enough to duplicate. http://www.rv.supermatrix.com/excel-log00.html Chris also used a spreadsheets to track all of his systems he had planned for his plane. http://www.rv.supermatrix.com/equip-list.html Have a look also at his "Systems" page. Nice job of outlining his wiring diagrams. Mike Nellis Plainfield, IL RV6 N699BM (res) Building Flaps Stinson 108-2 N9666K ----- Original Message ----- From: Alvin Melton To: RV7and7A(at)yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 2:57 PM Subject: Re: [RV7and7A] Logbook I'd be interested in a spreadsheet as well.... Alv --- Tobin Micki wrote: > Everyone, > > I am preparing to build a -7A and wondering about > how > the log book is kept. Is there a program out there > that will make it easier for me to orginize and keep > track of my progress. Has any one made an Excel > spreadsheet with the information. I am just trying > to > get a feel for what format the inspectors want to > see > the building process in. Any information would be > appreciated. > > Tobin Genung > Preview Plans > Stafford VA > > __________________________________________________ > only $35 > __________________________________________________ Van's Air Force - World Wide Wing www.vansaircraft.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 31, 2001
Subject: Marhyde & Topcoating
From: <racker(at)rmci.net>
Couldn't find this in the archives, and PPG didn't have a clue: Anyone try topcoating Marhyde #5111 Self-Etching Primer with PPG DCC Concept 2000 (or similar acrylic urethane)? If so, any noticeable incompatibilities? Thanks, Rob Acker (RV-6, painting interior). ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "C J Heitman" <cjh(at)execpc.com>
Subject: Marhyde & Topcoating
Date: May 31, 2001
Rob, The Product Spec Sheet for Concept DCC is on the PPG web site: http://www.ppg.com/refinishftpsite/docs/P-168.pdf It lists PPG DX1791 Self Etching Primer as a compatible surface. This may be similar to Marhyde. Chris Heitman Dousman WI RV-9A N94ME (reserved) slow progress on finish kit while I build hangar http://www.execpc.com/~cjh/rv9a.html -----Original Message----- Anyone try topcoating Marhyde #5111 Self-Etching Primer with PPG DCC Concept 2000 (or similar acrylic urethane)? If so, any noticeable incompatibilities? Thanks, Rob Acker (RV-6, painting interior). ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kevin Schlosser" <kevinschlosser(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Builder profile
Date: May 31, 2001
Apologizing ahead of time for some OT heading change... Yeah Jim, I am an aviation addict. Could be worse, I could be in a bar somewhere getting crocked. At least my wife knows where I am and who I'm with. I started with control line as a kid and moved up to RC in late high school. Stopped at graduation to go to school for electronics. Restarted full-tilt-boogie with the RC airplane bug about 6-7 years ago. Loving life ever since. I'm webmaster and executive trustee of the club now. Jersey Coast Sport Fliers, Colts Neck, NJ - USA. I get Model Aviation with the AMA, Model Airplane News, RC Modeler, RC Report, Flying Models, and occasionally I pick up a glider or electric oriented mag at the hobby shop. I have a nifty table in the corner of my 'library' to store my reading material. Washing my hands thoroughly, for a long time, usually helps with the numb legs :-P Always wanted to get a pilot's license and build or buy a 'full-scale' aircraft. Those RC model magazines had a Kolb ad in it that looked ok. Checked into it and was nearly ready to write the check for the Mark 3 Extra with all the trimmings. I was sitting around the dinner table with my flying buddies (from the RC club), many of them are 'full-scale' pilots or A&P mechanics, etc. One of the guys said, "Yeah, those Kolbs are a blast but if you want to go to Oshkosh and Sun & Fun with us, you'll keep up with us and be more comfortable in something more conventional. Ever seen a Van's RV?" Went all over the net looking at Kolbs, Rans, Velocity XL, Lancair, and a bunch of others... landed at Van's, and boy did the adventure begin! After getting all the Matronix lists and lurking for 3 months, I whittled them down a little at a time. The RV lists, by far, see the most action. I started checking out the 'play-by-play' coverage of RV's being built on the web. After seeing it in photos from front to back, I decided it is very doable. With some construction classes from the folks in Texas that do the upholstery for the RV's, I think it'll go pretty well. I told the wife that my vacation next year will be to go learn RV building. She just smiles and says "Uh Huh". My cousin is suggesting I sell him my inventory of model kits and motors to finance the RV project. While it would probably cover funds for my Lycoming 4-banger, I told him I might be nuts but not stupid. I'll fiddle with the little planes while trying to think through a jam on the big one. Aviation is like therapy for me. Dealing with computers all day long, and managers that have thier ties so tight it cuts off thier oxygen and logic... I need a break. Airplanes do it for me. I believe whole heartedly that airplanes are the reason I turned out ok too. Give a kid a hobby they can involve thier mind and spirit with, and you just might save them. Better than a needle, bottle, or pipe. Get high on aviation. Most fun you can have with your clothes on. I'm trying to get a youth activity commitee together in my RC club for this very reason. Happy Landings, Kevin Schlosser -=< PropellerHead >=- Blowing out of work early to fire up the club cessna! ----- Original Message ----- From: Jim Sears Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 3:30 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Builder profile >Heh Heh... My wife is going to love it when all the >"full scale" magazines start showing up :-). I already >get 6 RC Airplane magazines. She has already asked >why I need them ALL. I told her it's cheap education >and prevents me from making some costly mistakes >by showing me the right way to do things. This way >the magazine pays for itself. Oh, no!!! I didn't know I was responding to a modeler! Six magazines? When do you have time to read them? I do well to read two model aviation magazines a month. Yeah. I'm a modeler, too. I was even a AMA VP for ten years and finally had to give that up if I ever intended to finish my RV. :-) Today, I read "Model Aviation" and "RC Report." That's enough. >She doesn't need to know it gives me all those ideas >to buy the next latest and greatest thing :-) "Kitplanes" will do nicely for that. :-) Jim Sears in KY (AMA Assoc. VP) RV-6A N198JS ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kevin Schlosser" <kevinschlosser(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Looking in the Scrap bin
Date: May 31, 2001
If you don't find it on-list, try MetalMart.com they don't have minimums, etc. Don't say anything about the "A Word". -< PropellerHead >- It aint a 3 point landing unless all three points are wheels. ----- Original Message ----- From: Ralph E. Capen Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 5:11 PM Subject: RV-List: Looking in the Scrap bin Fellow listers, I need a piece of 6061-T6 extruded aluminum alloy, 1" x 1" x .063 thick about 8 inches long to replace an autopilot roll servo bracket that I've missdrilled. Anyone have anything like this in their scrap bin? I'll pay for it if necessary - just don't want to pay minimums and cutting fees which could make this not worth while... Thanks, Ralph Capen ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 31, 2001
From: "Owens, Laird" <Owens(at)aerovironment.com>
Subject: Marhyde & Topcoating
Rob, I've done a couple of really small things using Marhyde and Concept. No incompatibilities, but I don't think adhesion was as good as with K36 or the DP epoxy primer. Not documented, just general my general impression. Small parts were ok, but I'd be a little concerned about large areas. You could always do some test sample to try it out. Laird RV-6/DCC Concept exterior SoCal From: rv-list(at)matronics.com on Thu, May 31, 2001 2:51 PM Subject: RV-List: Marhyde & Topcoating Couldn't find this in the archives, and PPG didn't have a clue: Anyone try topcoating Marhyde #5111 Self-Etching Primer with PPG DCC Concept 2000 (or similar acrylic urethane)? If so, any noticeable incompatibilities? Thanks, Rob Acker (RV-6, painting interior). ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 31, 2001
From: Kevin Horton <khorton(at)cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: Thickness of f-804 spacers---RV-8
> >RV-8 builders-- The building instructions for the RV-8 say to make spacers >for the wing spar slots in bulkhead f-804 out of wood material exactly the >thickness of the spar ends. Wood is not all that stable being susceptible >varying changes in thickness with the addition of moisture or when subjected >to pressure. I wonder what others have done here and what experiences you >have encountered in building this part of the "8". > I have milled the spacers in aluminum allowing about 0.010" oversize from >the dimension of 1.440" for the spar bars. To those "that have been there" >-- is that enough or more than enough clearance to insert the spar? --or too >much clearance to take up in tightening the bolts? > >Ray Parker > Ray, I used a series of large nuts as spacers, plus a small shim. I believe I aimed for a thickness about 0.005 in thicker than my spar. Scott McDaniels said that Van's uses aluminum spacers, exactly the same thickness of the spar. He says you can file a small taper on the end of the spar, and that it will go in even if the hole is 0.010 to 0.015 too narrow. See the RV-list archives for a message "RV-8 False spar" on April 24, 1999. See http://eccentrix.com/misc/rv8/fuselage/f01.html for pictures of how I used the large nuts. There is one thing to watch out for when you measure the thickness of your spar: On mine, the thinner pieces of material were not quite tight against the spar bars at the root end. Once I clamped things together (like they will be once you tighten up the bolts after sliding them into the fuselage), the thickness was exactly 1.437 (1 7/16), as mentioned in the Construction Manual. My wings fit perfectly, although I will admit I was quite worried about it beforehand. -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (mounting wings) Ottawa, Canada http://eccentrix.com/misc/rv8/rv8.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MeangreenRV4(at)aol.com
Date: May 31, 2001
Subject: Bakersfield BBQ / Fly Inn
EAA Bakersfield Chapter # 71 will be holding a Fly-Inn / BBQ June 2, 2001, =A0BBQ served at around 2:00 pm, Outback Restraunt will be catering the food this year. BBQ Prices are $10.00 and that includes the drink and dessert. All are welcome, this is the HRll Rocket capital of the world and there will also be many RV's (all types) also. The BBQ is located at the north end of the field of (L45) Bakersfield Muni. 122.8 Hope to see you there ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RVPilot4(at)webtv.net (BOBE.)
Date: May 31, 2001
Subject: Models
In 1958 I flew to Freeport ILL. to visit my mother,a nurse in the old St. Francis Hospital (now closed).I bummed a ride with a man and his mother who was at the airport flying a large radio controlled model airplane. On the way into town I asked about the cost(models) and sat in stunned amazement when he told me.I did not mean to get my foot in my mouth sideways,but I said "for that kind of money you could fly a real airplane and you would have to play with toys". It got real quite inside that car.The silence was deafening .I hate it when my brain goes out to lunch and does't come back. He dropped me off some distance from the hospital. I thanked him for the ride and while walking had time to contemplate on the error ot my ways Bob Murphy Poplar Grove ILL. (C77) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <john.bright(at)bigfoot.com>
Subject: Re: Looking in the Scrap bin
Date: May 31, 2001
Does the metalmart.com aluminum angle have a radius or sharp corner on the "inside" corner? ----- Original Message ----- From: Kevin Schlosser <kevinschlosser(at)msn.com> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 5:19 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Looking in the Scrap bin > > If you don't find it on-list, try MetalMart.com they don't have minimums> , etc. Don't say anything about the "A Word". > > -< PropellerHead >- > It aint a 3 point landing unless all three points are wheels. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ralph E. Capen > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 5:11 PM > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV-List: Looking in the Scrap bin > > > Fellow listers, > > I need a piece of 6061-T6 extruded aluminum alloy, 1" x 1" x .063 thick > about 8 inches long to replace an autopilot roll servo bracket that I've > missdrilled. > > Anyone have anything like this in their scrap bin? I'll pay for it if > necessary - just don't want to pay minimums and cutting fees which could > make this not worth while... > > Thanks, > Ralph Capen > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ferdfly(at)aol.com
Date: May 31, 2001
Subject: Re: Thickness of f-804 spacers---RV-8
In a message dated 5/31/01 10:50:40 AM Pacific Daylight Time, Parker43rp(at)aol.com writes: > ". > I have milled the spacers in aluminum allowing about 0.010" oversize > from > the dimension of 1.440" for the spar bars. To those "that have been there" > -- is that enough or more than enough clearance to insert the spar? --or > too > much clearance to take up in tightening the bolts? > > Ray Parker > > > Ray, I think your main spars are 1.437 so 1.440 is more realistic. I made spacers for a buddy, RV9 and the spacers have since been used in an RV8 Fred LaForge RV-4 180 CS EAA tech counselor ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill VonDane" <n8vd(at)earthlink.net>
"Rv-List(at)Matronics.Com"
Subject: -8(A) Vent Lines...
Date: May 31, 2001
Can somebody send me pictures, or point me to pictures of how they terminated their vent lines out the bottom of the fuse? Thanks in advance... Bill VonDane, Colorado Springs, CO RV-8A, N8VD, Plumbing http://vondane.com/rv8a/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DDFLAMINI(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 01, 2001
Subject: Roy Adams update
Slow Recovery for Pilot/Owner in Astronaut/Tailwind Crash Debra Adams, the wife of Ray Adams, the owner of the Wittman Tailwind that crashed May 22 ("Astronaut Critically Injured in SportPlane Crash/Fire," 05-24-01; "Astronaut Patricia Robertson Dies In Wittman Tailwind Crash/Fire; Roy Adams Still Listed As Critical," 05-25-01, ANN), has brought us up to date on the condition of her husband: Roy had surgery on Tuesday, May 29th. They removed his right leg at midcalf. They removed all damaged skin across his tummy down to the fascia and began grafting skin from his back. There was enough to cover most of his tummy. They did the same to his left thigh. They used donor skin on his thigh. His arms and hands are burned but he will not lose any fingers. The most severe burn being on the inside of his right arm. The doctor has assured me that the underlying muscles are intact and healthy. He continues to be on the respirator and he is aware sometimes but heavily sedated. His face is burned but is mostly second degree. I see a few areas of third but they are very small and the doctors feel his face will heal with no problem. His ears and nose are fine. His hair was burned but will grow back. There has been a fund set up by some of Roy's friends at First Community Bank in Alvin TX. There are a couple of blood drives that are being organized as well. (So far, he has used about 12 units that I know of and will need more.) The FAA has dismantled the plane's motor (with the manufacturer) and the preliminary report is negative for any mechanical failure. The witnesses I have talked to have reported that the plane was throttled up without incident during the takeoff. I did hear one report (not sure of the source) that the plane had a power failure, but that is unverifiable. There was a beautiful memorial service for Patti Robertson on the 29th of May. I attended in spite of the fact that Roy's surgery had taken place that day. I knew that he would want me to go. It was held at a hangar at Ellington Field. Memorabilia from her life was displayed on tables and there was a video presentation depicting her life and work. Such a loss! The family and friends of Patti greeted me as if I, too, were family and cried with me. I wanted to be there to lend my comfort and support, but they comforted me. There is an ocean of unconditional love in that family! **** 5/31/01 Preliminary Accident/Incident Data Record 1 **** A. Type: A Mid Air: N Missing: N Entry date: 5/24/01 # From: SOUTHWEST REGION OPERATIONS CENTER B. Reg. No.: 3GJ M/M: EXP Desc: EXP-1984 WITTMAN TAILWIND Activity: Training Phase: Take-off GA-A/C: General Aviation Descr: EXPERIMENTAL ACFT WAS INVOLVED IN TOUCH AND GO LANDINGS, ON THE 4TH TAKE-OFF, THE ACFT PITCHED TO THE RIGHT, THE LEFT WING STRUCK THE RWY, AND THE ACFT BEGAN TO CARTWHEEL DOWN THE RWY, THE ACFT STRUCK TREES AT THE END OF THE RWY, CAUGHT FIRE, AND WAS DESTROYED, 1 FATAL ON 5/24, MANVEL, TX. WX: METAR LBX 222253Z AUTO 36007KT 10SM CLR A2999 Damage: Destroyed C2. Injury Data: # Crew: 2 Fat: 1 Ser: 1 Min: 0 Unk: # Pass: 0 Fat: 0 Ser: 0 Min: 0 Unk: # Grnd: Fat: 0 Ser: 0 Min: 0 Unk: D. Location. City: MANVEL State: TX Country: US E. Event Date: 5/22/01 Time: 2100 F. Invest Coverage. IIC: Reg/DO: SW09 DO City: HOUSTON DO State: TX Others: NTSB G. Flt Handling. Dep Pt: MANVEL, TX Dep Date: 5/22/01 Time: 2100 Dest: MANVEL, TX Last Radio Cont: NONE Flt Plan: NONE Last Clearance: NONE WX Briefing: N Other: AAI IIC: ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: RV-8 ingress/egress
Date: May 31, 2001
Guys, Let me offer to start a very serious and controversial thread here, one that is surely to be looked up frequently in the archives... "What is the best way for passengers to get in and out of the back seat of an RV-8?" There, I asked, I admit it, I can't figure it out. I can build the friggin plane, but I can't for the life of me figure out an elegant way for passengers to get in and get out *without* stepping on my nice new DJ Lauritsen upholstery. So please offer up the results of your extensive ergonomic testing in this area for the benefit of all, and especially me! Of course demonstration pictures would always be appreciated, in fact I volunteer to post the winning technique on my site. Randy Lervold RV-8, N558RL, 33.1 hrs. www.rv-8.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Norman, MD" <jnorman(at)InterMapSystems.com>
Subject: Great Clamp Systems
Date: Jun 01, 2001
Here is my contribution for the week. I just got my new engine with an Air Flow Performance fuel injection system. It comes with a high pressure fuel pump and an in-line filter. However, both are to be mounted using large Adel clamps. Sure it works, but not very elegant, nor does it make me feel good about the security of these relatively heavy pieces. In searching for a better mounting system, I found this site, and specifically this page of this site: http://www.cushaclamp.com/omega.html I called them and bought two of these clamps, one part number T026MS030 and one T030MS034 ( 1 5/8 and 1 7/8 inch Omega series clamps, respectively). The cost was about $3.50 each and they arrived in two days. Well they are absolutely PERFECT for this application. They fit the fuel pump and fuel filter like they were all made in the same mold. These are beefy clamps and one is all that is needed for each, the pump and the filter (they are different sizes, as noted). They sit in a hard rubber (composite) which keeps them about 1/8 inch off of the wall you are mounting it to, and a beefy stainless steel bracket clamps the rubber around the pump and to the wall. If you have an Air Flow Performance system, I highly recommend these clamps. Also, I'm sure there are some clamps here that you can use for other parts of the plane as well. Jim, Tampa, 6A engine stuff... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Albert Gardner" <albert.gardner(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: F711 Bulkhead
Date: May 31, 2001
On my RV-9A, I'm making the F711 D Angle (plans sheet 21). It is to be made from 6-1/32" of AA6-125x3/4x3/4. There are two pieces provided, one is 17" long and the other is 24". Does anyone remember which would be the proper one to use? Thanks, Albert Gardner Yuma, AZ RV-9A: N872RV (Reserved) Working on fuse (finally) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Norman, MD" <jnorman(at)InterMapSystems.com>
Subject: c/s prop techniques
Date: Jun 01, 2001
Scott, Can you bring this with you on Saturday so I can see it... and know what to ask for when I call them... Sounds like something I would like to have. Also, I talked to Don and James, they both will be at the engine hanging on Saturday ... 11:00 am. jim -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of ABAYMAN(at)aol.com Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 6:30 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: c/s prop techniques HEY RANDY if you went to sun - n - fun or I'm sure it will be there at Oshkosh, the Lycoming booth. i picked up their lycoming flyer, which more like a book of compiled flyers. in it is a tremendous amount of info pertaining to the engine and props. they are trying to put to bed the oversquare myth. in fact they recommend you run it oversquare because the engine likes it there. this flyer is a must have, if you own a lycoming and a constant speed prop. if you can't find it at Oshkosh, I'm sure if you give them a call they will send one to you. it was free at sun-n-fun. hope this helps Scott Tampa ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 27, 2001
From: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: RV-8 ingress/egress
Randy Lervold wrote: > > > Guys, > > Let me offer to start a very serious and controversial thread here, one that > is surely to be looked up frequently in the archives... > > "What is the best way for passengers to get in and out of the back seat of > an RV-8?" > > There, I asked, I admit it, I can't figure it out. I can build the friggin > plane, but I can't for the life of me figure out an elegant way for > passengers to get in and get out *without* stepping on my nice new DJ > Lauritsen upholstery. So please offer up the results of your extensive > ergonomic testing in this area for the benefit of all, and especially me! Of > course demonstration pictures would always be appreciated, in fact I > volunteer to post the winning technique on my site. > > Randy Lervold > RV-8, N558RL, 33.1 hrs. > www.rv-8.com > Randy I am sure you well get some different explanations but my experience of taking passengers for rides for over 11 years is that the best way is to have them step on the seats. I figure the seats are expendable because I would rather the damage be done to the seats than the rest of the airframe. People well grab, kick, bump, and hit everything in sight even when you help them in and out. Now this is for an Rv-6 :) I don't know how you well do it in your RV-8. BTW my seats are still fine after 11 years. Jerry S ________________________________________________________________________________
From: W4PPN(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 01, 2001
Subject: Re: RV8-List: RV-8 ingress/egress
Randy I have always accepted the fact that in this type of airplane YOU WILL step on the back seat. I am planning to have a small mat made up to place on both seats to step on until you get in. Will keep the dirt and stuff off of the seat and in turn off of your tail feathers. Nearly every airplane of this type that I have flown (Two holer, fore and aft) requires that you step on the seat. T-34's, Stearmans, T-6, Pitts, etc. I don't know of anyone who has the proper number of degrees of freedom at the base of the spine and leg intersection that will permit having one leg on the wing walk and the other on the floor of the airplane. I just finished a back operation and I can tell you for a fact that I sure as hell am not going to try to through my afterburner out of joint trying to reach the floor in one shot. Make a nice little pad to put on the seat, grab the roll bar, put your right foot on the seat and then raise the left foot and put it down in the cockpit. Depending on size you may want to continue to hold the roll bar and/or place one or both hands on the cockpit rails and lower yourself into the pit. Of course you have to get that right foot out of the way and you might want to let your seat pack slide down the seat back to keep from crashing onto the seat. By the way I looked at Jeff's RV-8 when it was here at 14A and he had three cushions made up for the back seat so that you could adjust the height for different passengers. Neat idea and I am going to copy it. I once crawled into a Mooney Mite and could not get out. You sit on the floor with a very thin seat cushion and there is no place to hook your heel to get any leverage to push yourself out. The cockpit rails, at the time, placed my arms at a point where I could not get any leverage to push myself up and out. Finally I had to summon my buddy and ask him to haul my fanny up far enough so I could get out of the damned thing. It was the first and last time for me in an M-18. Got a lot of laughs out of that over the years. Now lets see what some others have to say in this airmans ballet. Howard Cochran Mooresville, NC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 01, 2001
From: barry pote <barrypote(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: F711 Bulkhead
Albert, I don't remember, but if the every thing else is equal, always use the short piece 1st. You may need the long piece for a long piece, if you know what I mean. Barry Pote RV9a ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 01, 2001
From: Bill VonDane <bvondane(at)cso.atmel.com>
Subject: Telex PC-4
Anyone have any experience with the Telex PC-4 intercom? Specifically used with stereo headsets like the Lightspeeds? Thanks... Bill VonDane, Colorado Springs, CO RV-8A, N8VD, Plumbing http://vondane.com/rv8a/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 01, 2001
From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: RV-8 ingress/egress
A point concerning the selection of seat upholstery material came to my attention only after several hours in my RV-6. Yes, the only way for a normally articulated human life form to enter an RV is by stepping on the seat cushion (I did witness one passenger, the wife of a local builder, who entered my RV by having her right foot on the wing, and her left foot went directly to the floor.......needless to say, this was one leggy, flexible individual!). Only by a fortuitous stroke of serendipity did I select a dark charcoal mingled fabric for the surround portion of the bottom cushion, the portion that endures the shoes of boarding passengers and pilots: http://home.HiWAAY.net/~sbuc/journal/interior.html Little did I realize at the time how fortunate was the selection of the dark color for the outside of the cushions. If the lighter color had been on the outside edges, I would have a major seat maintenance problem. The lesson learned: Make sure you allow for the heavy traffic on the seat cushions when you select the color and material for the seats. You want a color that will not show footprints from all the folks you are going to be carrying in your plane. I also carry a small rubber mat that I put over the seat when the ground is wet/dirty. Sam Buchanan (RV-6 with the great D.J. upholstery) "The RV Journal" http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal ================== Randy Lervold wrote: > > > Guys, > > Let me offer to start a very serious and controversial thread here, one that > is surely to be looked up frequently in the archives... > > "What is the best way for passengers to get in and out of the back seat of > an RV-8?" > > There, I asked, I admit it, I can't figure it out. I can build the friggin > plane, but I can't for the life of me figure out an elegant way for > passengers to get in and get out *without* stepping on my nice new DJ > Lauritsen upholstery. So please offer up the results of your extensive > ergonomic testing in this area for the benefit of all, and especially me! Of > course demonstration pictures would always be appreciated, in fact I > volunteer to post the winning technique on my site. > > Randy Lervold > RV-8, N558RL, 33.1 hrs. > www.rv-8.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 01, 2001
From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: Builder profile/AOPA
There is no doubt Phil Boyer is a dynamo of a representative for our GA interests. He has appeared in front of so many congressional panels that he is known by the entire legislature as a strong, consistent advocate of general aviation. I carbon-copied Mr. Boyer the letter I sent to Senator John ("ATC User Fee") McCain expressing my support for Boyer's appointment to a GA advisory board that was instituted by the Clinton administration. Senator John ("tax the little planes") McCain successfully blocked Boyer's appointment to the panel because Phil publicly objected to McCain's desire to initiate fees for everything from weather briefings to the use of flight following. I promptly received a note from Phil thanking me for my support and pledging that the fight has only just begun. It is in the interest of ALL general aviation users to support AOPA because we only have to look across our border to the north, and across the pond to the east to see where GA is headed if we allow the ground-bound pols to dictate how and when we can fly our little planes. Sam Buchanan ============================= Steven DiNieri wrote: > > > I recently wrote a serious letter to both AOPA and the EAA, outlining my > concerns about the privatization of the Niagara Falls airport. Primarily the > inhospitable attitude toward ga and experimental aircraft. Wouldn't you know > that Phil Boyer wrote me from Europe to tell me one of his associates would > be getting in contact with me. As for EAA ....I've sent the letter three > times with not so much as a courtesy reply. > FWIW > > Steven DiNieri > Niagara Falls, New York > RV-6A, P28A-160 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RobHickman(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 01, 2001
Subject: RV ingress/egress
Randy, I carry a small towel that I put on the seat to step on. I have found that I use the towel for a lot of things, spilled drinks, sneeze on the canopy.... Rob Hickman RV4 N401RH ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: RV-8 ingress/egress
Date: Jun 01, 2001
Thread-Topic: RV-List: RV-8 ingress/egress Thread-Index: AcDqr2tgr/6E0lReQ1iUuc8nctJTBAAAIXiw
From: "Bob Japundza" <Bob.Japundza(at)realmed.com>
Randy, I had my seats made out of vinyl for this exact reason. When they get dirty I spray some upholstery cleaner on them and wipe down. The F1 will have leather seats, so hopefully leather will hold up as well as the vinyl has. One thing you could do is to have an upholstery shop make up some clear slip covers for your bottom cushions, just like your crusty old aunt's living-room furniture. Bob Japundza RV-6 N244BJ O-360C/S flying 144 hours not going to tx this weekend as planned (wx) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: Re: RV ingress/egress
Date: Jun 01, 2001
That seems to be the concensus. There's been some pretty humorous responses to this inquiry. ----- Original Message ----- From: <RobHickman(at)aol.com> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 8:17 AM Subject: RV-List: RV ingress/egress > > Randy, > > I carry a small towel that I put on the seat to step on. I have found that I > use the towel for a lot of things, spilled drinks, sneeze on the canopy.... > > > Rob Hickman > RV4 N401RH > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: financial report
Date: Jun 01, 2001
The financial report is published in the EAA Sport Aviation Magazine every year, as required by law, last year it was in August and this year it will be in September. Earl Lawrence - EAA ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Builder profile/AOPA
Date: Jun 01, 2001
Thread-Topic: RV-List: Builder profile/AOPA Thread-Index: AcDqswydiuDYzVFZQpy8a3Mef5hZ8QAAZDdg
From: "Todd Wenzel" <TWenzel(at)hsdinc.com>
AMEN SAM!! I've been a member of AOPA and EAA for only a couple of years. I appreciate both organizations for their public advocacy of GA. But, I have to admit, AOPA seems to always have a much larger public and congressional presence. I appreciate the doggedness of Phil Boyer's conviction to promote GA and stop any type of additional user fees! I feel ALL pilots should support AOPA - especially if they are EAA members. Todd Wenzel RV-8AQB - Still pounding away AOPA & EAA Member Delafield, Wisconsin -----Original Message----- From: Sam Buchanan [mailto:sbuc(at)hiwaay.net] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 10:07 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: Builder profile/AOPA There is no doubt Phil Boyer is a dynamo of a representative for our GA interests. He has appeared in front of so many congressional panels that he is known by the entire legislature as a strong, consistent advocate of general aviation. I carbon-copied Mr. Boyer the letter I sent to Senator John ("ATC User Fee") McCain expressing my support for Boyer's appointment to a GA advisory board that was instituted by the Clinton administration. Senator John ("tax the little planes") McCain successfully blocked Boyer's appointment to the panel because Phil publicly objected to McCain's desire to initiate fees for everything from weather briefings to the use of flight following. I promptly received a note from Phil thanking me for my support and pledging that the fight has only just begun. It is in the interest of ALL general aviation users to support AOPA because we only have to look across our border to the north, and across the pond to the east to see where GA is headed if we allow the ground-bound pols to dictate how and when we can fly our little planes. Sam Buchanan ============================= Steven DiNieri wrote: > > > I recently wrote a serious letter to both AOPA and the EAA, outlining my > concerns about the privatization of the Niagara Falls airport. Primarily the > inhospitable attitude toward ga and experimental aircraft. Wouldn't you know > that Phil Boyer wrote me from Europe to tell me one of his associates would > be getting in contact with me. As for EAA ....I've sent the letter three > times with not so much as a courtesy reply. > FWIW > > Steven DiNieri > Niagara Falls, New York > RV-6A, P28A-160 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "lucky macy" <luckymacy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: RV-8 ingress/egress
Date: Jun 01, 2001
just keep a piece of cloth material handy in a side pocket to throw on top of the seat cushion. take of side pocket, throw it on top of seat cushion, step on it, sit your butt down, pull the cloth out, put back in side pocket, fly, reverse process. >From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)hiwaay.net> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV-List: RV-8 ingress/egress >Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 09:53:06 -0500 > > >A point concerning the selection of seat upholstery material came to my >attention only after several hours in my RV-6. > >Yes, the only way for a normally articulated human life form to enter an >RV is by stepping on the seat cushion (I did witness one passenger, the >wife of a local builder, who entered my RV by having her right foot on >the wing, and her left foot went directly to the floor.......needless to >say, this was one leggy, flexible individual!). Only by a fortuitous >stroke of serendipity did I select a dark charcoal mingled fabric for >the surround portion of the bottom cushion, the portion that endures the >shoes of boarding passengers and pilots: > >http://home.HiWAAY.net/~sbuc/journal/interior.html > >Little did I realize at the time how fortunate was the selection of the >dark color for the outside of the cushions. If the lighter color had >been on the outside edges, I would have a major seat maintenance >problem. > >The lesson learned: > >Make sure you allow for the heavy traffic on the seat cushions when you >select the color and material for the seats. You want a color that will >not show footprints from all the folks you are going to be carrying in >your plane. I also carry a small rubber mat that I put over the seat >when the ground is wet/dirty. > >Sam Buchanan (RV-6 with the great D.J. upholstery) >"The RV Journal" http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal > >================== > >Randy Lervold wrote: > > > > > > Guys, > > > > Let me offer to start a very serious and controversial thread here, one >that > > is surely to be looked up frequently in the archives... > > > > "What is the best way for passengers to get in and out of the back seat >of > > an RV-8?" > > > > There, I asked, I admit it, I can't figure it out. I can build the >friggin > > plane, but I can't for the life of me figure out an elegant way for > > passengers to get in and get out *without* stepping on my nice new DJ > > Lauritsen upholstery. So please offer up the results of your extensive > > ergonomic testing in this area for the benefit of all, and especially >me! Of > > course demonstration pictures would always be appreciated, in fact I > > volunteer to post the winning technique on my site. > > > > Randy Lervold > > RV-8, N558RL, 33.1 hrs. > > www.rv-8.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Barstad, Are" <BarstadA(at)bis.adp.com>
rv8list(at)yahoogroups.com, rv-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: RE: RV8-List: RV-8 ingress/egress
Date: Jun 01, 2001
Ahhh, I can finally speak with experience, WITHOUT having my own flying RV-8! :) I'm 5'11", around 180lb and have by now had a few back seat rides in 2 different 8's. I have always been able to enter without stepping on the seat. Here's what I do: Before you start the routine, you must of course place the harness in a way so you won't sit on it. Also make sure the foot wells are clear. I find that sometimes maps etc. might slide down in them. 1) Step on the wing-walk with both feet, torso facing the cockpit. 2) Grab left side of roll bar with left hand and right side of turtle deck with right hand. 3) Put right foot ON THE FLOOR just forward of the seat and aft of the right rudder pedal. 4) Put left foot on the floor just forward of the seat and aft of the left rudder pedal. 5) Move hands to grab sides (on the rails I think) one at the time - left first. 6) Slide in, get comfy, make sure you don't obstruct the stick and enjoy the fantastic view. I get out by reversing the technique: Pull feet towards yourself and stand up by hanging on to the rails first then change grip to roll-bar/turtle deck and left foot out first (this is a wee bit tough - I have to stretch. Then right foot out. If your voice sounds like Michael Jackson's when you say "thanks for a terrific ride", you should get medical attention first, then read my instructions again... The other option is something I think Terry Jantzi did: Cut a Styrofoam piece into the shape of a size 12 foot (pucker factor). The passenger can then drop the 'foot' in the seat, stand on it and slide in. You should probably remove the 'foot' before sitting down to avoid discomfort... :) NOTE: I noticed that one builder installed the fire extinguisher on the left wall just under the rail. This seem to conflict with the knees of passengers that are taller than 6'2". It was also in the way when exiting the seat since the left foot had to be lifted higher at an earlier stage. Another installation I saw was behind the pilots seat-back; up fairly high. This was nice and does not interfere with the passenger. I'm not sure how easy the pilot can reach it though. I will try it sometime before installing mine. I will be able to take pictures of this tomorrow if anyone is interested. Are RV-8 Wings -----Original Message----- From: Randy Lervold [mailto:randy@rv-8.com] Sent: June 1, 2001 12:49 AM rv-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RV8-List: RV-8 ingress/egress --> RV8-List message posted by: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com> Guys, Let me offer to start a very serious and controversial thread here, one that is surely to be looked up frequently in the archives... "What is the best way for passengers to get in and out of the back seat of an RV-8?" There, I asked, I admit it, I can't figure it out. I can build the friggin plane, but I can't for the life of me figure out an elegant way for passengers to get in and get out *without* stepping on my nice new DJ Lauritsen upholstery. So please offer up the results of your extensive ergonomic testing in this area for the benefit of all, and especially me! Of course demonstration pictures would always be appreciated, in fact I volunteer to post the winning technique on my site. Randy Lervold RV-8, N558RL, 33.1 hrs. www.rv-8.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 01, 2001
From: Michael McGee <jmpcrftr(at)teleport.com>
Subject: Re: RV-8 ingress/egress
In a Grumman AA-1 I used to fly, the seat cushion was "hinged" in the back with velcro or something. You would swing the first leg in and flip the cushion up with your toe then stand on the floor under the cushion. After getting the trailing leg in and shuffling your feet forward the cushion fell into place for you to sit on. Mike Mike McGee, RV-4 N996RV, O320-E2G, Aurora, OR > >Guys, > >Let me offer to start a very serious and controversial thread here, one that >is surely to be looked up frequently in the archives... > >"What is the best way for passengers to get in and out of the back seat of >an RV-8?" > >There, I asked, I admit it, I can't figure it out. I can build the friggin >plane, but I can't for the life of me figure out an elegant way for >passengers to get in and get out *without* stepping on my nice new DJ >Lauritsen upholstery. So please offer up the results of your extensive >ergonomic testing in this area for the benefit of all, and especially me! Of >course demonstration pictures would always be appreciated, in fact I >volunteer to post the winning technique on my site. > >Randy Lervold >RV-8, N558RL, 33.1 hrs. >www.rv-8.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 01, 2001
Subject: For Sale
From: Anthony J Castellano <tcastella(at)juno.com>
I am posting this for a friend. For Sale RV6 wing kit, New, Pre punched skins. In original boxes. $4000 or best offer. Phone (845) 227-8527 or E-Mail me at the address below. Tony Castellano tcastella(at)juno.com Hopewell Junction, NY RV-6 N401TC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jim Sears <sears(at)searnet.com>
Subject: Re: Builder profile/AOPA
Date: - - - , 20-
See what I meant about Cy in my earlier post? I learned from a KR-2 builder a long time ago that Cy is on several lists. He isn't even a builder. He's a Bellanca pilot. Who knows? He may actually be a spy for the EAA. :-) Jim Sears in KY >> I'm replying but as I never got the original, I can't even direct your letter to the proper person. Send me a copy of your letter and I will personally see that you get a reply. Cy Galley Editor, EAA Safety Programs cgalley(at)qcbc.org or experimenter(at)eaa.org << ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 01, 2001
From: Jim Duckett <perfeng(at)3rivers.net>
Subject: Substraints and topcoats
Rob and others, Not wanting to start another long thread on finishes...Just would advise you to use the total system of a manufactuer and follow their directions. We use PPG, DuPont and Randolph systems and don't mix and match. Marhyde is a "supplimental" manufactuer and doesn't produce a full system so we don't use their products. IMHO they produce a lower quality product than the "big three". The three are tried and proven systems and have great tech support through their dealers. Check the archives for a looong list and threads... Jim Duckett Performance Engineering RV-6A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chuck Rabaut" <crabaut(at)coalinga.com>
Subject: Builder profile/AOPA
Date: Jun 01, 2001
Hey... Didn't they pass some sorta law outlawing "Bellanca" pilots? Okay boys, let's get a rope! ----- Original Message ----- From: Jim Sears <sears(at)searnet.com> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:34 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Builder profile/AOPA > > See what I meant about Cy in my earlier post? I learned from a KR-2 > builder a long time ago that Cy is on several lists. He isn't even a > builder. He's a Bellanca pilot. Who knows? He may actually be a > spy for the EAA. :-) > > Jim Sears in KY > > >> > > I'm replying but as I never got the original, I can't even direct your > letter to the proper person. Send me a copy of your letter and I will > personally see that you get a reply. > > Cy Galley > Editor, EAA Safety Programs > cgalley(at)qcbc.org or experimenter(at)eaa.org > << > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Andy Karmy <andy.karmy(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: AFS paint/primer systems
Date: Jun 01, 2001
----- Original Message ----- From: "Alison and Neil McLeod" <bedrock(at)theriver.com> > Anybody out there have experience with the AFS (Aircraft Finishing > Systems) stuff, specificly the primer sealer and 2 part polyurethane > topcoat. If so I'd like to know how you prepped and what type equipment > you used. Ok, well since there have been no reply's I'll come out of readonly mode for a second... I have not used AFS products on much aluminum, however I did paint my fabric covered MiniMax with their 2 part polyurathane topcoat products. I also used the primer and topcoat on my aluminum struts and misc parts. First, I used it since it was waterbased and I could much more easily spray it in my attached garage than a MEK based system. Overall I liked it, however it is a bit harder to use than some systems as it's a 2 part system. Thus you must mix, prep spray, wait for it to dry type process. It looks very glossy when done and turns heads (I won grand champion ultralight at Arlington 2000 with it). The people at AFS are very knowledgeable and helpfull. Give Paul a call and see what he has to say. He did tell me that their primary customers are the comercial operators painting jets as they love the non hazmat nature of the waterbourne coatings. - Andy Karmy Seattle, WA Hoping / Dreaming of a 9A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Frazier, Vincent A" <VFrazier(at)usi.edu>
"RV-List Digest (E-mail)"
Subject: canopy breaker
Date: Jun 01, 2001
Occasionally there is talk on the list about canopy breaking tools. Here's one that I hadn't seen before: http://www2.grizzlyindustrial.com Search for item H2416, Walther jungle tool. It's only 9 oz and does everything except convert into a portable hangar. Anybody tried this thing? It looks pretty neat. $39.95 Vince Frazier Harmon Rocket II ... the fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness." http://www.usi.edu/science/chemistry/vfrazier/page1.html <---- note: new URL as of 5/30/01 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ross A. Scroggs" <rscroggs(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: BAC RV-4 Parts
Date: Jun 01, 2001
Help, I purchased a wing kit for a RV4. With this kit I received Barnard Aircraft Components Quick Build parts. This is the kit that supplied you with already built parts that are gold annodized and tagged with the part numbers on them. Kind of cheating!! In BAC's flyer, they mention that they provide extra drawings to supplement Van's drawings. Does anybody have those drawings? I would like a copy and would be able to pay for coping and shipping if needed. This kit is no longer available. Most of the parts need no explanation but some of them are not shown in my RV4 drawings, such as W425A, some kind of a shim I think. Anybody remember these drawings? Thanks in advance, Ross Scroggs RV-4 #3911 Conyers, Ga. rscroggs(at)worldnet.att.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Greg Tanner" <gtanner(at)bendcable.com>
Subject: kits
Date: Jun 01, 2001
I picked up my fuse and finish kits this AM at Vans for my 9. I got there a liitle earlier than they expected so to kill some time, Scott took me up in the demonstrator. It was a nice distraction. The 7 left early (around 5) for Texas. I was back in Bend by 11:50 and I have my wife's van full of plane parts! Greg Tanner RV-9A WINGS O-320 D1A/CATTO N80BR RESERVED ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: It's unanimous
Date: Jun 01, 2001
RV-8ers, My quest for the definitive methodology for RV-8 passenger ingress/egress yielded a swift and unanimous result... ya gotta step on da seat! RV-8 builder/pilot Joe Czachorowski gets the award for the most succinct and illustrative description of the now-approved methodology and is copied below. Thanks to all who responded, now we know how it's done. If anyone would care to take step-by-step pictures of this procedure, of course using a gorgeous or visually interesting model, I'd be happy to put them on my web site. We could all then send our passengers to this page for a required pre-flight briefing before taking them for a ride! Randy Lervold RV-8, N558RL, 31.2 hrs www.rv-8.com > I too have beautiful leather DJ seats. I did not want anyone stepping on > them also. After giving over 30 GIB rides here is what I came up with: > > 1 - No matter how much you brief people to get in and out, they will end up > doing something different if you don't watch them. > > 2- The first method I tried was to tell them "exactly" how to get in, i.e. > please put both feet on the black part of the wing, Then, put your right > foot on the floor just in front of the seat, now bring your left foot in on > the floor and just slide right in. THIS DOES NOT WORK! DON'T DO IT THIS > WAY! people end up grabbing parts of your plane that you don't want them > to grad, namely, the CANOPY! > > 3- The next thing I tried was to take a rag and place it on the seat. Have > them step on the rag with their right foot and then get in. That worked OK > I guess, but sometimes the rag slipped and so did the passenger. > > 4- The BEST method that worked on my last ten passengers was the KISS > method. This method assures that you will still have parts of your > airplane still attached after they get in. This is what I say..... > > "Place both feet on the black part of the wing (this is my slip guard). > Next, place your right foot ON the seat. Don't worry about getting it > dirty because the bottom of your pants leg will clean it. Now, with your > right hand, grab the right side of the airplane (meaning the right canopy > rail). Now bring your left foot in and place it on the floor. Your left > hand will naturally grab the left side of the aircraft (meaning the left > canopy rail). Now you can let yourself down with your arms and put your > feet in the footwells". > > This method works for me and I am happy to say I still have ALL my parts > attached to the plane! People will want to grab your canopy and put their > weight on it. You really have to watch them even though you politely asked > them not to grab the canopy. I don't care about people stepping on the > seats. I rather would have them get into the aircraft safely and not get > hurt rather than worry about a little dirt. Heck, when I clean the belly > of the plane, I make a point to clean my seats even though they don't look > dirty. Well Randy, that's my story and I stickin' to it! > > Joe ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 01, 2001
From: Kevin Horton <khorton(at)cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: Builder profile/AOPA
> >we only have to look >across our border to the north, and across the pond to the east to see >where GA is headed if we allow the ground-bound pols to dictate how and >when we can fly our little planes. > >Sam Buchanan > >============================= Sam, All is not lost here in Canada. While I certainly agree that y'all have it better than us in some ways, we have taken the lead in others. For example: Owner Maintenance category: a recent change allows owners of many older types of aircraft to move them to an Owner Maintenance category. This allows them to do their own maintenance and modifications without getting any official approvals or A&P signoffs, i.e. just like us homebuilders. One guy used this method to put a LOM engine in his DHC-1 Chipmunk, and another guy put a Corvette engine in this SeaBee. Many other people are taking advantage of the decrease in costs to fly. Extended medical validity periods - Private Pilots less than 40 years old now only have to renew their medical every 5 years, as long as they don't fly to the US. The medical is only valid for 2 years if flying to the US though. Builder assistance - there will be a public meeting in June to discuss proposed major changes to the regulations regarding homebuilts. We will be able to use builder assistance if these changes get approved. Advanced ultralights - we have had an Advanced Ultralight category for years, with a max gross weight of 1200 lb. So, we aren't doing as bad as some people think, at least from an aviation perspective. Happy flying, -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (mounting wings) Ottawa, Canada http://eccentrix.com/misc/rv8/rv8.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Keith Hughes" <rv6tc(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Aileron stop
Date: Jun 01, 2001
OK. I can't figure out how to get in there and mount the aileron control stops. There is no room to mark, clamp or get really small fingers (my wife's) to locate the stop. I know someone has figured out an easier way. Thanks, Keith Hughes RV-6 Finish Parker, CO ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Terry Watson" <tcwatson(at)seanet.com>
Subject: Re: It's unanimous
Date: Jun 01, 2001
Ok, Randy, now that it's unanimous, I gotta chime in. When Bill Benedict gave me my ride in the back of the 8A at Arlington about 3 years ago, I asked I could step on the seat and was told not to. I remember being a bit embarassed for asking. Terry 8A fuselage - floors & flaps Seattle > > RV-8ers, > > My quest for the definitive methodology for RV-8 passenger ingress/egress > yielded a swift and unanimous result... ya gotta step on da seat! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: Re: Aileron stop
Date: Jun 01, 2001
> OK. I can't figure out how to get in there and mount the aileron control > stops. There is no room to mark, clamp or get really small fingers (my > wife's) to locate the stop. I know someone has figured out an easier way. > > Thanks, > > Keith Hughes > RV-6 Finish > Parker, CO Keith, I waited until final assembly, scribed a line where I wanted the aileron to stop while using a SmartTool to measure the deflection, then used an AN4 bolt with the appropriate washers to make a stop. You'll need an angle drill to drill the hole with the flaps & ailerons attached. It worked great. Randy Lervold RV-8, N558RL, 31.2 hrs www.rv-8.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: Re: It's unanimous
Date: Jun 01, 2001
The -8A is easier than the taildragger -8 because of the angle. Try them both, you'll see. Don't know why Bill wouldn't let you step on the upholstery, those things get tromped on by all sorts of showgoers. So how'd ya do it? Randy > > Ok, Randy, now that it's unanimous, I gotta chime in. When Bill Benedict > gave me my ride in the back of the 8A at Arlington about 3 years ago, I > asked I could step on the seat and was told not to. I remember being a bit > embarassed for asking. > > Terry > 8A fuselage - floors & flaps > Seattle > > > > > > RV-8ers, > > > > My quest for the definitive methodology for RV-8 passenger ingress/egress > > yielded a swift and unanimous result... ya gotta step on da seat! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: Re: Visiting SoCal & Oregon
Date: Jun 01, 2001
> Are there any known events in that area on the 16th? > Anything in the Seattle area? I'd really appreciate any suggestions. Are you kidding? The highlight of the year is June 16th... the Tenth Annual Northwest RV Fly-in at Scappoose Airpark. For details see... http://www.vanshomewing.org/ Randy Lervold RV-8, N558RL, 31.2 hrs www.rv-8.com Home Wing VAF ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ABAYMAN(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 01, 2001
Subject: Re: Aileron stop
randy where did you drill the hole and put the bolt? scott tampa ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 01, 2001
From: ENewton57(at)aol.com
Subject: New Builder
<> Matt gave you some great advise. I would add, that you should practice drilling out some rivets and re-doing it as you will definitly drill some out. If you screw up on the real thing, it will be do big deal if you know they are very easy to just drill out and re-do it. Eric Newton - Long Beach, MS RV-6A - N57ME (Reserved) (Fitting Cowling) www.ericsrv6a.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Duane Bentley" <dbentley(at)fuse.net>
Subject: Lyc. Fuel Pump Gasket
Date: Jun 01, 2001
I'm replacing the engine mounted fuel pump on my new Lycoming 0-360 with the high pressure fuel pump to install the Airflow Performance Fuel Injection. I assume there is a gasket under the fuel pump that will also need replacement. I called the local airports designated Lycoming parts dealer. He seemed a little indifferent to selling parts. He asked me what the P/N was and I told him I didn't know. He told me I shouldn't be working on a Lycoming engine without the engine manual, and besides, he doesn't sell less than a $50 order. I'm sure Aircraft Spruce will sell me the gasket, if I gave them a P/N. Does anyone have a Lycoming manual and can give me the fuel pump gasket part number? Thanks Duane Bentley RV6 N515DB (Reserved) Finishing the sliding canopy ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: Re: Aileron stop
Date: Jun 01, 2001
> where did you drill the hole and put the bolt? > scott > tampa Sorry, I drilled the hole through the aileron mount bracket (the big thing attached to the rear spar). The inboard aileron bracket (WD-406?) then hits the head of the bolt to form a stop. Randy ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David White" <dwhite17(at)columbus.rr.com>
, "Larava James" , "Richard Meske"
Subject: Fw: Gas Prices
Date: Jun 01, 2001
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jamie Cunningham" <cunningham.259(at)osu.edu> "Tony Della Rocco" ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; "Dave Bibb" ; "Mike Bierl" ; "Bret Wiegman" ; "Bob Macklin" ; "Brian Keller" ; "Kylie Butte" ; "Carrie Luedtke" ; "Connie Collins" ; "Sara Chaney" ; "Chris Maupin" ; "Chris Papadakis" ; "Chris White" ; "Dave White" ; "Jason Doty" ; "Eric Kent" ; "Goshe" ; "Lindsay Jenkins" ; "Kristin Halladay" ; "Jennifer Stevenson" ; "Kim Roeger" ; "Loren Stone" ; "Mandy Sagle" ; "MDH-S" ; "Pat McDevitt" ; "Mike Papadakis" ; "Mike Johnson" ; "Mom" ; "Nicole Zann" ; "Rachel Parker" ; "Dave Schritzinger" ; "Tony Sparks" Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 12:51 AM Subject: FW: Gas Prices > > ---------- > From: "LCpl Nicholas B Stanley" <stanleynb(at)boguewx.navy.mil> > Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 10:50:27 +0100 > To: "Becky Welsh" , "scott pullen" , > "Sarah Wall" , "PAT IAN MCDEVITT" > , "Megan McDevitt" , "Jamie > Cunningham" , "Heather May Stanley" > , "Grant Meier" , "Chris Pierce" > , "Betsy Ann Pierce" > Subject: Fw: FW: Gas Prices > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Cpl Kris Vanmoerkerque" <vanka(at)boguewx.navy.mil> > To: > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 7:46 AM > Subject: Fw: FW: Gas Prices > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Art Vanmoerkerque" <artv331(at)home.com> > > To: "Cpl Kris Vanmoerkerque" > > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 10:56 AM > > Subject: Fw: FW: Gas Prices > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Tiffany Tuttle" <tiff_tut(at)hotmail.com> > > > To: ; ; > > ; > > > ; ; ; > > ; > > > ; ; ; > > > ; ; ; > > > ; ; ; > > > ; ; > > > ; > > > Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 9:51 PM > > > Subject: Fwd: FW: Gas Prices > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Want gasoline prices to come down? > > > > >We need to take some intelligent, united action. > > > > > > > > > >Phillip Hollsworth (friend of a friend of a friend ..., offered this > > good > > > > >idea): > > > > > > > > > >This makes MUCH MORE SENSE than the "don't buy gas on a certain day" > > > > >campaign that was going around last April or May! The oil companies > > just > > > > >laughed at that because they knew we wouldn't continue to "hurt" > > > ourselves > > > > >by refusing to buy gas. It was more of an inconvenience to us than it > > was > > > a > > > > >problem for them. BUT, whoever thought of this idea, has come up with > a > > > > >plan > > > > >that can really work. Please read it and join with us! > > > > > > > > > >By now you're probably thinking gasoline priced at about $1.50 is > super > > > > >cheap. Me too! It is currently $1.97 for regular unleaded in my town. > > Now > > > > >that the oil companies and the OPEC nations have conditioned us to > > think > > > > >that the cost of a gallon of gas is CHEAP at $1.50- $1.75, we need to > > > take > > > > >aggressive action to teach them that BUYERS control the > > > marketplace....not > > > > >sellers. > > > > > > > > > >With the price of gasoline going up more each day, we consumers need > to > > > > >take > > > > >action. The only way we are going to see the price of gas come down > is > > if > > > > >we > > > > >hit someone in the pocketbook by not purchasing their gas! And we can > > do > > > > >that WITHOUT hurting ourselves. How? > > > > > > > > > >Since we all rely on our cars, we can't just stop buying gas. But we > > CAN > > > > >have an impact on gas prices if we all act together to force a price > > war. > > > > > > > > > >Here's the idea: > > > > > > > > > >For the rest of this year, DON'T purchase ANY gasoline from the two > > > biggest > > > > >companies (which now are one), EXXON and MOBIL. If they are not > selling > > > any > > > > >gas, they will be inclined to reduce their prices. If they reduce > their > > > > >prices, the other companies will have to follow suit. > > > > > > > > > >But to have an impact, we need to reach literally millions of Exxon > and > > > > >Mobil gas buyers. It's really simple to do!! Now, don't whimp out on > me > > > at > > > > >this point...keep reading and I'll explain how simple it is to reach > > > > >millions of people!! > > > > > > > > > >I am sending this note to about thirty people. If each of you send it > > to > > > at > > > > >least ten more (30 x 10 = 300)... and those 300 send it to at least > ten > > > > >more > > > > >(300 x 10 = 3,000) ... and so on, by the time the message reaches the > > > sixth > > > > >generation of people, we will have reached over THREE MILLION > > consumers! > > > > > > > > > >If those three million get excited and pass this on to ten friends > > each, > > > > >then 30 million people will have been contacted! If it goes one level > > > > >further, you guessed it..... THREE HUNDRED MILLION PEOPLE!!! Again, > all > > > you > > > > >have to do is send this to 10 people. That's all. > > > > > > > > > >(If you don't understand how we can reach 300 million and all you > have > > to > > > > >do > > > > >is send this to 10 people.... well, let's face it, you just aren't a > > > > >mathematician. But I am close to one... so trust me on this one.) > > > > > > > > > >How long would all that take? If each of us sends this email out to > ten > > > > >more > > > > >people within one day of receipt, all 300 MILLION people could > > > conceivably > > > > >be contacted within the next 8 days!!! I'll bet you didn't think you > > and > > > I > > > > >had that much potential, did you! Acting together we can make a > > > difference. > > > > > > > > > >If this makes sense to you, please pass this message on. > > > > > > > > > >PLEASE HOLD OUT UNTIL THEY LOWER THEIR PRICES TO THE $1.30 RANGE AND > > KEEP > > > > >THEM DOWN. THIS CAN REALLY WORK. > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 01, 2001
Subject: Re: Fw: Gas Prices
In a message dated 6/1/01 7:11:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time, dwhite17(at)columbus.rr.com writes: << > > > > >For the rest of this year, DON'T purchase ANY gasoline from the two > > > biggest > > > > >companies (which now are one), EXXON and MOBIL. If they are not > selling > > > any > > > > >gas, they will be inclined to reduce their prices. >> Ever since the Exxon Valdez incident, I never buy Exxon fuel unless there is no alternative and I'm on empty. I don't shop at Wal-Mart either but I see their parking lots overflowing every time I drive by. Go figure. -GV (RV-6A N1GV) vanremog(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 01, 2001
Subject: Re: Lyc. Fuel Pump Gasket
In a message dated 6/1/01 4:50:33 PM Pacific Daylight Time, dbentley(at)fuse.net writes: << I'm replacing the engine mounted fuel pump on my new Lycoming 0-360 with the high pressure fuel pump to install the Airflow Performance Fuel Injection. I assume there is a gasket under the fuel pump that will also need replacement. I called the local airports designated Lycoming parts dealer. He seemed a little indifferent to selling parts. He asked me what the P/N was and I told him I didn't know. He told me I shouldn't be working on a Lycoming engine without the engine manual, and besides, he doesn't sell less than a $50 order. I'm sure Aircraft Spruce will sell me the gasket, if I gave them a P/N. Does anyone have a Lycoming manual and can give me the fuel pump gasket part number? >> P/N 60096 Fuel Pump Gasket. FWIW, I agree with your parts dealer. Get the PC-106 Parts catalog at least. -GV (RV-6A N1GV) vanremog(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 02, 2001
From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: Builder profile/AOPA
Points well made. I do wish we Amurricuns could mimic your reluctance to award ridiculous tort settlements in the aviation community. But......I suspect the outrageous settlements are headed your way eventually...... Sam Buchanan ======================== Kevin Horton wrote: > > > > > >we only have to look > >across our border to the north, and across the pond to the east to see > >where GA is headed if we allow the ground-bound pols to dictate how and > >when we can fly our little planes. > > > >Sam Buchanan > > > >============================= > > Sam, > > All is not lost here in Canada. While I certainly agree that y'all > have it better than us in some ways, we have taken the lead in > others. For example: > > Owner Maintenance category: a recent change allows owners of many > older types of aircraft to move them to an Owner Maintenance > category. This allows them to do their own maintenance and > modifications without getting any official approvals or A&P signoffs, > i.e. just like us homebuilders. One guy used this method to put a > LOM engine in his DHC-1 Chipmunk, and another guy put a Corvette > engine in this SeaBee. Many other people are taking advantage of the > decrease in costs to fly. > > Extended medical validity periods - Private Pilots less than 40 years > old now only have to renew their medical every 5 years, as long as > they don't fly to the US. The medical is only valid for 2 years if > flying to the US though. > > Builder assistance - there will be a public meeting in June to > discuss proposed major changes to the regulations regarding > homebuilts. We will be able to use builder assistance if these > changes get approved. > > Advanced ultralights - we have had an Advanced Ultralight category > for years, with a max gross weight of 1200 lb. > > So, we aren't doing as bad as some people think, at least from an > aviation perspective. > > Happy flying, > -- > Kevin Horton RV-8 (mounting wings) > Ottawa, Canada > http://eccentrix.com/misc/rv8/rv8.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Thomas Mosher" <tgmosher(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: P&W Canada PT-6A on RV-8A
Date: Jun 02, 2001
You might have a little bit of an aft CG problem using a PT6A - I just took a quick look at it's TCDS and the shortest one is about 61 inches with a dry weight in the low 300 lb range. Some of the PT6As run about 72 inches long. Also, PT6As in decent shape aren't cheap. Maybe an Allison or a Walthers? Tom ----- Original Message ----- From: <Jim_Andrews(at)tivoli.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 12:39 PM Subject: RV-List: P&W Canada PT-6A on RV-8A > > I'm posting this for a fellow RV builder who is having e-mail problems... > > - Jim > > > While I'm still building my empennage I'm looking > forward. I've planned to use a Lycoming O-360 but > exploring my options. > > Does anyone know of a RV-8 with a tubine mounted? > Would this be feasable? > > Davidk > > David B. Kumhyr > dkumhyr(at)tivoli.com > Telephone +1 512/436-1268 > Mobile +1 512/IBM-8900 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "bjc" <bjc(at)btconnect.com>
Subject: UK RV builders & Flyers
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Todd, and any other visitors to the UK; you can find an up to date list of UK/European RV builders and flyers at www.rv6.co.uk Best regards Barry Clifford (RV6a wings) >Are there any RV builders in the Chester or Manchester, UK area? I am stuck >here for a bit and would be happy to help you with your project when I am >here. I am currently, well when in Seattle, working on RV8 wings. >Better, I would be happy to sit in the right seat or rear seat anytime you >want some ballast in you RV. >Cheers, >Todd W. Rudberg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 02, 2001
From: John Lawson <jwlawson(at)hargray.com>
Subject: Riveting skills
> > From: "Al Grajek" <algrajek(at)msn.com> > Subject: RV-List: New Builder > > > I am finally ready to purchase and proceed with building an RV-8. I am wo> ndering if I have the skills. How many of you have done this before? Me!!!!!!!!!! :-) > I am> mechanically inclined but have never worked with rivets etc. Is this a s> kill easily learned. In a word, 'yes.' A previous lister's advice was right on target. Find a nearby builder and ask him to give you some advice...the vast majority of RV builders will be more than happy to spend some time with you and show you the basics...then you can pick up some basic tools and some scrap material to practice on. That builder might just put the Tom Sawyer principle to work ("work" isn't work, when a person thinks it is fun...remember how Tom got his Aunt Polly's fence painted?) and have you help him with his project. If you'd like a more formal 'warm and fuzzy', there are workshops (EAA/SportAir, Orndorff, etc) that you can attend...if you want more details about a particular workshop, just post an inquiry about it to this workshop. The riveting skill is relatively easy to acquire, so don't sweat it. Semper Fi, John RV-6 (work getting in the way of installing the aileron trim...) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ashley & Margaret Johnston" <Jabiru.nz(at)xtra.co.nz>
Subject: Bruce Cruikshank
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Group, Would someone be so kind as to pass to me the E-mail address of Bruce Cruikshank. Kindest regards to all Ashley Johnston Jabiru New Zealand ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RVer273sb(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Subject: Re: Lyc. Fuel Pump Gasket
Make sure you get the pump push rod properly located on the pump arm! Stewart RV4 N273SB ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Textor" <pincjt(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Tank dimple dies
Date: Jun 03, 2001
Morning friends, When using the Cleaveland tank dies should you use them on the skin and ribs or use the tank die for the ribs and regular #40 die for the skin? Thanks, Jack in DSM RV8, tanks, getting close to goo time ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 02, 2001
From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: Tank dimple dies
Jack, when assembling the fuel tanks, use the tank dies on ribs and skin. This is so a deeper dimple will be formed that will allow for the build up of sealer in the dimple. On the rest of the airframe, you can use the tank dies on the substructure and regular dies on the skins. You may find that this allows the skins to fit a little tighter to the bulkheads. Sam Buchanan (RV-6) "The RV Journal" http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal More info on tank dies here: http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal/tankdies.html ================================== Jack Textor wrote: > > > Morning friends, > When using the Cleaveland tank dies should you use them on the skin and > ribs or use the tank die for the ribs and regular #40 die for the skin? > Thanks, > Jack in DSM > RV8, tanks, getting close to goo time ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cleaveland Aircraft Tool" <mail(at)cleavelandtool.com>
Subject: Tank dimple dies
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Jack, You should use the tank dies on the skin and on the ribs when dimpling the tanks. Use them on the substructure of the rest of the airplane to get the dimples to "nest" together better. Call me if you need more details. Mike Mike Lauritsen Cleaveland Aircraft Tool 2225 First St. Boone, IA 50036 1-800-368-1822 Mike(at)CleavelandTool.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Jack Textor > Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 11:26 AM > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV-List: Tank dimple dies > > > Morning friends, > When using the Cleaveland tank dies should you use them on > the skin and > ribs or use the tank die for the ribs and regular #40 die for > the skin? > Thanks, > Jack in DSM > RV8, tanks, getting close to goo time > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Subject: Re: Bruce Cruikshank
In a message dated 6/2/01 3:44:09 AM Pacific Daylight Time, Jabiru.nz(at)xtra.co.nz writes: << Would someone be so kind as to pass to me the E-mail address of Bruce Cruikshank. >> Bruce can be reached at -GV (RV-6A N1GV) vanremog(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 02, 2001
From: Edward Hicks <EdHicks(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: Aileron stop
>>OK. I can't figure out how to get in there and mount the aileron control stops. There is no room to mark, clamp or get really small fingers (my wife's) to locate the stop. I know someone has figured out an easier way.<< Keith, I used double-sided tape to hold the stop in position. First I figured out where the correct location for it was, then once the location was set correctly, I took off the aileron and used a small c-clamp to hold the stop firmly while I drilled the two holes. Good luck, Ed Hicks. RV-6 QB G-BZRV (Panel stuff) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kevin Schlosser" <kevinschlosser(at)msn.com>
Subject: Fw: RV9-List: H-frame question
Date: Jun 02, 2001
----- Original Message ----- From: Kevin Schlosser Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 8:56 AM Subject: Re: RV9-List: H-frame question Todd, I've been looking at your site for a while getting ideas. The wing jig, for me, will need to be portable. My garage has a real tall ceiling and I can't do the jackpost routine without some real problems with post length. How do you solve any settling problems in the jig? If the wood warps or sags, how do you tweak out any problems? I'm guessing the horizontal members don't really need to be perfectly straight as long as the vertical posts are plumb and your floor is a level reference for the spars. I've got to plan ahead and figure out what to do before I buy any components of the kit due to space limitations. One builder on the web was using an I-beam jig for his fuselage. I was thinking of trying the same thing for both the fuselage and the wings/tail. If I get them made up to bolt together, I can take them apart when I'm done and donate them to a local EAA chapter or save them for friends that night build one after they see mine. Still looking for ideas to make everything tuck away neatly into "my side" of the garage after a building session. Kevin Schlosser -< PropellerHead >- Future RV-7 Builder... Still debating the canopy type: Tip Up / Slider (50/50) Was (20/80) :-) Terry Jantzi's video totally screwed me up now. ----- Original Message ----- From: Todd Houg Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 2:55 AM Subject: Re: RV9-List: H-frame question --> RV9-List message posted by: Todd Houg Jennifer, I concur with the others as to the neeed for the jig for empennage assembly. I didn't use it(or builf it) until I started on the wings. One option you might want to consider is a free standing portable wing jig on casters that you can move around. You can take a look at the one that I built at http://www.toddhoug.com under the wing jig section. I've found this jig to be very useful. I created the support arms long enough to mount a wing on either side of the jig to allow working on both simultaneously. Of course you can't get between them, so you will need a temporary wing storage to put one while working on the other. I mounted a couple of short 12" support arms to one wall of my garage and move one wing to there while working on the other. Welcome! Todd Houg St. Francis, MN Wings, tanks 'n things --> RV9-List message posted by: jennifer groceman Hi All, I'm finally getting started on my emp & it's time for me to build the H-frame. Can someone tell me exactly what this "jig" is going to be used for? I am starting this project in the living room and cannot really attach anything to floor (and preferably not the ceiling). I have room in the garage to do this, but I was wondering how much time will be spent doing work on the jig; i.e. do stuff inside and then haul it out to the garage to finish it off, etc... Also if anyone has any ideas for alternatives to bolting to the floor (like building a more rigid free standing frame), I'd love to hear them. Thanks for the help, Jennifer Groceman Lake Worth, Florida RV9A - empennage ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 02, 2001
From: Jim Duckett <perfeng(at)3rivers.net>
Subject: Peeling edges
Will, Your probably right about the painters not prepping properly. As stated on here before, etching and priming is the MOST important part of a paint job. Poor prepping (cleaning, etching, priming) and using low quality or mismatched products will make your "Dream Bird" look like it went through a sand storm after only a few months of clear air flying. The easiest way to think of a complete finish is comparing it to plywood. Every laminate (paint or primer layer) must be bonded to the other coats. Chemically cleaning and etching the ALCAD allows the primer to "bite" and adhere. There are self-etching primers that have etching agents in the formula that cuts out the etching step. All the steps (etching, priming, painting) have time frames in which the products are "coatable". In other words, you may only have 4- 8 hrs after final primer coat flash in which to topcoat without having to scuff the primer or re-coat before top coating. It sounds like this may have happened to you. The problem is that the finish will look perfect until one little grain of sand or hard headed bug hits it and penatrates to the base material (alcad). Then air pressure and moisture enter the breech and without any layer adherance, the substraint starts seperating from the base and topcoat. To answer your question on whether to refinish the wing or not, it's really up to you. Here's the problem. If in fact the wings were not properly prepped you can strip (mechanically or chemically) the bad areas past the lifting and hope you can strip to an area that has good adherance and re-finish and hope for the best. The down side is, if you don't have good adherance of the substraint you'll end up stripping on the whole wing anyway. I'd try to strip past the lifted area first to see if the whole wing is that way or just that spot. It'll have to done anyway. As with us, most painters give some type of warranty on their work. Get a couple of other painters to look at the area to give you a little more insight when you talk to the one that painted your 6. If it is determined that the product was defective most manufacuters will, after some debate, cover at least the cost of materials to re-do the job. Hope this helps Jim Duckett Performance Engineering RV-6A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Van Artsdalen, Scott" <svanarts(at)unionsafe.com>
Subject: Micromonitor oil temp probe location
Date: Jun 02, 2001
I searched the archives on the subject line of this email but came up with nothing. I was wondering if some of the micromonitor users out there can tell me where they located their oil temperature probe? I need to find out what plug I need. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kevin Schlosser" <kevinschlosser(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Models of RV Aircraft (Was Models)
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Wow, Look what I just got in the mail today! Great Planes / Tower Hobbies is releasing a new .40 size radio control model airplane kit of the RV-4. Wooo Hooo! Now they just need to come out with the RV-6/7 and I'm set! John, this may take some building, but it's BIGGER than the Van's model, and you can paint it whatever color you want. If you don't have model plane experience, you might want to go with the Van's version. See link I just scanned in.... http://propellerhead.rcplanet.com/gp_rv-4.jpg Coooool! -< PropellerHead >- ----- Original Message ----- From: John Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 6:07 PM Subject: models Kevin, have you ever seen an RV model in the marketplace? I am looking for one...don't want to pay the $95 or so that Van wants for a solid one...even though they are very nice.... John Salida CO ________________________________________________________________________________
From: AV8TURDON(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Subject: Re: Models of RV Aircraft (Was Models)
I scanned that link and it is wrong. It for creating a web page. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Keith Hughes" <rv6tc(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Canopy Jettison
Date: Jun 02, 2001
One decision that I have been going back and forth on, is the canopy jettison for the -6 tip up. While I think that the circumstances that would lead me to jettisoning the thing in the air are almost non-existent, there is an argument to be made about using it to remove the canopy on the ground. However, how often (really) am I going to be removing the thing, and would it really be that bad to have to reach up and remove two bolts. If it's not a big deal, I really don't want that thing on my panel for a few reasons. Could those of you that have been through this weigh in and let me know what you've found through experience or what has run through your mind in making your decision. Thanks, Keith Hughes RV-6 finish Parker, CO ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Textor" <pincjt(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Tank 405 attach angle ???
Date: Jun 03, 2001
Yet another tank question! Thanks in advance for some help. Because the nose of the rib is rounded a bit, should I contour the angle some to fit up to the rib better or force the rib to fit the flat back-side of the angle? Also, Where can I find the measurements for the slot cut-out? Thanks again! Jack in DSM rv8, tanks ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 02, 2001
From: Richard Lundin <rlundin46(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: P&W Canada PT-6A on RV-8A
I did a little research on the Turbine/prop option and there doesn't seem to be a good answer in off the shelf products. I was looking for 200-250 shp. There is a T-63 turbine near that with an ok price but no gearbox is available. If you find a good combo make sure you post it. Rick --- Thomas Mosher wrote: > > > You might have a little bit of an aft CG problem > using a PT6A - I just took > a quick look at it's TCDS and the shortest one is > about 61 inches with a dry > weight in the low 300 lb range. Some of the PT6As > run about 72 inches long. > Also, PT6As in decent shape aren't cheap. > > Maybe an Allison or a Walthers? > > Tom > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <Jim_Andrews(at)tivoli.com> > To: > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 12:39 PM > Subject: RV-List: P&W Canada PT-6A on RV-8A > > > Jim_Andrews(at)tivoli.com > > > > I'm posting this for a fellow RV builder who is > having e-mail problems... > > > > - Jim > > > > > > While I'm still building my empennage I'm looking > > forward. I've planned to use a Lycoming O-360 but > > exploring my options. > > > > Does anyone know of a RV-8 with a tubine mounted? > > Would this be feasable? > > > > Davidk > > > > David B. Kumhyr > > dkumhyr(at)tivoli.com > > Telephone +1 512/436-1268 > > Mobile +1 512/IBM-8900 > > > > > > > > through > > http://www.matronics.com/archives > http://www.matronics.com/emaillists > > Matronics! > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 02, 2001
From: "Boyd C. Braem" <bcbraem(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Canopy Jettison
Unless you have a parachute on and intend to bail out of the aircraft, I would strongly recommend that you do not jettison the bubble canopy of a GA plane. This is based on my time as a US Navy Flight Surgeon and reviews of who-knows-how-many NTSB reports and is worth what you paid for it. The main problem is potential damage to the VS/rudder, causing loss of those control surfaces in an already stressful, potentially deadly situation. Some folks contend that being able to jettison the canopy "just before impact" will save you, somehow, if the plane ends up inverted. However, if you're crash landing in trees, rough terrain, etc. the canopy becomes a protective device to protect your skull, that would otherwise be hanging out there in the breeze. And, if you are ditching in an emergency, the last thing you need is a last minute distraction when your attention should solely focused on making the best possible controlled crash. If your cockpit is engulfed in flames, losing the canopy and providing more forced air to the fire may make things worse instead of better. If your cabon monoxide monitor (you have one, right?) goes off, close cabin heat and ventilate the cockpit. You are allowed to put in extra cockpit air vents other than those that come with the kit. Boyd Braem Keith Hughes wrote: > > > One decision that I have been going back and forth on, is the canopy > jettison for the -6 tip up. While I think that the circumstances that would > lead me to jettisoning the thing in the air are almost non-existent, there > is an argument to be made about using it to remove the canopy on the ground. > However, how often (really) am I going to be removing the thing, and would > it really be that bad to have to reach up and remove two bolts. If it's not > a big deal, I really don't want that thing on my panel for a few reasons. > > Could those of you that have been through this weigh in and let me know what > you've found through experience or what has run through your mind in making > your decision. > > Thanks, > > Keith Hughes > RV-6 finish > Parker, CO > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randall Henderson" <randallh(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Tank 405 attach angle ???
Date: Jun 02, 2001
> Because the nose of the rib is rounded a bit, should I contour > the angle some to fit up to the rib better or force the rib to fit > the flat back-side of the angle? Definitely round off the angle to fit the rib. >Also, Where can I find the measurements for the slot > cut-out? Don't know that one. As I recall I just slotted it a little bigger than the bolt. Randall Handerson, RV-6 N6R (~200 hrs) Portland, OR www.vanshomewing.org ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Terry Watson" <tcwatson(at)seanet.com>
Subject: Re: Tank 405 attach angle ???
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Jack, I remember contouring the 405 attach angle quite a bit. As for the slot, Van's sells a little kit of parts for about $3 that includes the drawing. It was also published in an issue of RVAtor. The kit includes instructions for the slot, but when I called Van's for a clarification, they told me to ignore the instructions and do it another way. I guess it depends on who you talk to. Terry RV-8A fuselage floors & flaps Seattle RV-List message posted by: "Jack Textor" > Yet another tank question! Because > the nose of the rib is rounded a bit, should I contour the angle some to > fit up to the rib better or force the rib to fit the flat back-side of > the angle? Also, Where can I find the measurements for the slot > cut-out? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BSEckstein(at)cs.com
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Subject: Re: Micromonitor oil temp probe location
In a message dated 6/2/01 1:52:47 PM Eastern Daylight Time, svanarts(at)unionsafe.com writes: > was wondering if some of the micromonitor users out there can tell me > where they located their oil temperature probe? I need to find out what > plug I need. > On the back of the engine in about the middle is a threaded hole on the top of the accessory case. The hole goes straight down (vertical) into an oil passage. George Orndorf sells a plug that works perfectly for the RMI temp probe. Brian Eckstein 6A Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John" <fasching(at)amigo.net>
Subject: Fw: Rv6 Canopy Release
Date: Jun 02, 2001
----- Original Message ----- From: "John" <fasching(at)amigo.net> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 2:56 PM Subject: Rv6 Canopy Release > I made this decision 6 years ago. The only thing the "T" handle release is > good for is to release it either: > > 1. In flight...are you going to jump out? Do you use a chute? Is it > going to hit > the tail and cause a REAL problem? Will a panic stricken passenger > pull the darn thing for you? Could happen. > > 2. On the ground when: > a. You crashed and the aircraft is upside down..."T" handle > won't help you then, > b. You want to do maintenance...then reach up and remove the > two bolts. > > I could find nothing positive about the "T" handle release, and lots of > negatives. In 6 years I have never had the need to remove the canopy at any > rate. > > FWIW John RV6A Flying, Salida, CO > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Glenn & Judi" <foxinsocks(at)mediaone.net>
Subject: Re: Fw: Rv6 Canopy Release
Date: Jun 02, 2001
I used some locking pins in place of the T handle. They have a pushbutton to release them (from under the top skin behind the sub panel). I also have them safety wired in place. To take my canopy off for work is not a lot easier than having to manipulate a couple of wrenched while lying on the cockpit floor. I got the pins from McMaster Carr Supply. Part#92384A014. The 014 suffix on the part # denotes pin grip lenth. Double check the size you need for ordering. You can see a picture of the pin by going to http://www.mcmaster.com/ and then enter 92384A014 in the "Products, Find" box on the left. Once you locate it, hit the Find Catalog Page button for a picture (Item B) and the part codes for vaious grip lengths. -Glenn Gordon N442E reserved ----- Original Message ----- From: "John" <fasching(at)amigo.net> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 3:58 PM Subject: RV-List: Fw: Rv6 Canopy Release > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John" <fasching(at)amigo.net> > To: > Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 2:56 PM > Subject: Rv6 Canopy Release > > > > I made this decision 6 years ago. The only thing the "T" handle release is > > good for is to release it either: > > > > 1. In flight...are you going to jump out? Do you use a chute? Is it > > going to hit > > the tail and cause a REAL problem? Will a panic stricken passenger > > pull the darn thing for you? Could happen. > > > > 2. On the ground when: > > a. You crashed and the aircraft is upside down..."T" > handle > > won't help you then, > > b. You want to do maintenance...then reach up and remove > the > > two bolts. > > > > I could find nothing positive about the "T" handle release, and lots of > > negatives. In 6 years I have never had the need to remove the canopy at > any > > rate. > > > > FWIW John RV6A Flying, Salida, CO > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kevin Schlosser" <kevinschlosser(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Models of RV Aircraft (Was Models)
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Try This... http://propellerhead.rcplanet.com/gp_rv-4.jpg The list messed up the address by truncating it. ----- Original Message ----- From: AV8TURDON(at)aol.com Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 2:35 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Re: Models of RV Aircraft (Was Models) I scanned that link and it is wrong. It for creating a web page. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: windsaloft(at)rmisp.com (Terri Watson)
Subject: great advice I got when I started building
Date: Jun 02, 2001
You wrote: I am finally ready to purchase and proceed with building an RV-8. I am wondering if I have the skills. How many of you have done this before? I am mechanically inclined but have never worked with rivets etc. Is this a skill easily learned. Reply: Yes the skills are easily learned --- and you'll spend the whole kit learning them, I suspect! I wanted to do this for years (build an RV). Figured -- no time, money, skills, tools, other excuses. Two local friends and builders just kept, oh, taking me for rides, talking with me about it. Finally decided to do a couple of intermediate steps --- made a trip to visit Van's, see the factory, see the kit pieces on the shelves, see the QB fuselages on the shelves --- walking around, it was very apparent that it is just a bunch of pieces ( a LOT!) that get stuck together --- to quote a contractor friend of mine --- building is 10 % inspiration and creativity, and the balance is tedious repetition and attention to detail. It looked more do-able than before I went. While out there, went to Henry Gorgas' weekend skills seminar on basic RV-building metal skills you need to get going. It changed me from a "can I?" to an "I can!" --- I definitely could learn in two days the skills to at least get started. The skills are not hard to learn --- it takes a bit of practice to get good, but not too much. I suspect that when I am done with this project, I'll know enough to start. Now, I'm chugging slowly along. Second best advice I got was "JUST START." Quit trying to collect all the tools, learn the skills, get everything in the shop just right ----- Just start. When you hit work stoppage b/c you don't have a tool or don't know what to do, spend the energy solving it. Get the tool. Ask a question to Van's, search the archives of this list, ask the question. Each little hurdle you overcome reinforces that it is actually not that hard. And, you make progress while you learn. One step at a time. To quote someone on this list -- you are NOT building an airplane. You are building the forward spar of the horizontal stabilizer. Keeps it manageable. The empennage seems to be purposefully the first kit b/c it is pretty easy and introduces all kinds of fun concepts -- jigs, rivets, torquing bolts, etc. You learn a lot in a relatively error-forgiving environment (yes, I have started a couple things over already!). I don't have tons of expertise to add to this list, but as a novice, non-builder, average mechanical ability, never done anything like this person, I can tell you that now that I am underway, the confidence and excitement just keeps building. DO IT! Terri Watson Lander, Wyoming RV-6 to 7 empennage, playing with jigs. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: AV8TURDON(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Subject: Re: Models of RV Aircraft (Was Models)
In a message dated 6/2/01 2:46:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time, kevinschlosser(at)msn.com writes: > http://propellerhead.rcplanet.com/gp_rv-4.jpg > > Thanks, I'll get one for sure I fly R/C also. If they don't make a six I'll scale up a fuselage and cut out my own and make the cowl out fiberglass. SInce the wing is the same it will be easy to scale a fuselage from our plans. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jim jewell" <jjewell(at)okanagan.net>
Subject: Re: P&W Canada PT-6A on RV-8A
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Hello Richard, I took a brief look at Turbine power in RVs early on in my project and found that the GPH fuel burn for any turbine that I could find that might fit would limit range too much. to add enough fuel to regain the range would mean added fuel/weight in the wings or another tank forward in the fuse. After looking at the re-design problems I decided that adding fuel capacity and the long nose to cope with weight and balance represented enough design work to just start from scratch. Of course now that I've said this someone is busy doing it or will get the job done. I do know someone that has a surplus Bell helicopter power plant that puts out plenty of power. He had two, the other unit was put into A Beade 5 and flew very well just using the turbine's thrust without the gear reduction. It can fly at about 280 to 300 MPH. He considered installing the second unit using the gearbox. He felt that the shaft output would allow very short take offs and near vertical flight. The BD5-J was sold to someone in California last year. Jim in Kelowna ----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Lundin <rlundin46(at)yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 12:02 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: P&W Canada PT-6A on RV-8A > > I did a little research on the Turbine/prop option and > there doesn't seem to be a good answer in off the > shelf products. I was looking for 200-250 shp. There > is a T-63 turbine near that with an ok price but no > gearbox is available. If you find a good combo make > sure you post it. > Rick ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 02, 2001
From: Pem Walton <pemster(at)usa.net>
Subject: Wing Tip AAntennas
Hi All I am looking for the link to the plans for the wing tip antennas in RV's. Want to build a pair and I can't remember where I saw the plans. Thanks a bunch Pem Walton RV7A Ordering the Empennage kit soon ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Al Grajek" <algrajek(at)msn.com>
Subject: RV builders in KY
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Are there any RV builders out there in or around Kentucky? Al Grajek Lexington, KY 859-296-0244 algrajek(at)msn.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Kevin Schlosser Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 6:20 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Re: Models of RV Aircraft (Was Models) Try This... http://propellerhead.rcplanet.com/gp_rv-4.jpg The list messed up the address by truncating it. ----- Original Message ----- From: AV8TURDON(at)aol.com Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 2:35 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Re: Models of RV Aircraft (Was Models) I scanned that link and it is wrong. It for creating a web page. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ABAYMAN(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Subject: Re: c/s prop techniques
jim i forgot about the lycoming flyer, it was in my truck and i didn't take it out to show you. oops, anyway, thanks for having us experience another successful engine hanging. scott ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Al Grajek" <algrajek(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: great advice I got when I started building
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Terri. Thanks so much for th encouragment. I can't wait to get started. I may try to visit the factory. Good Idea! Did you find the jigs hard to build, or are the instructions pretty straight forward? Thanks again. Al Grajek ----- Original Message ----- From: windsaloft(at)rmisp.com Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 6:34 PM Subject: RV-List: great advice I got when I started building You wrote: I am finally ready to purchase and proceed with building an RV-8. I am wo ndering if I have the skills. How many of you have done this before? I am mechanically inclined but have never worked with rivets etc. Is this a s kill easily learned. Reply: Yes the skills are easily learned --- and you'll spend the whole kit learning them, I suspect! I wanted to do this for years (build an RV). Figured -- no time, money, skills, tools, other excuses. Two local friends and builders just kept, oh, taking me for rides, talking with me about it. Finally decided to do a couple of intermediate steps --- made a trip to visit Van's, see the factory, see the kit pieces on the shelves, see the QB fuselages on the shelves --- walking around, it was very apparent that it is just a bunch of pieces ( a LOT!) that get stuck together --- to quote a contractor friend of mine --- building is 10 % inspiration and creativity, and the balance is tedious repetition and attention to detail. It looked more do-able than before I went. While out there, went to Henry Gorgas' weekend skills seminar on basic RV-building metal skills you need to get going. It changed me from a "can I?" to an "I can!" --- I definitely could learn in two days the skills to at least get started. The skills are not hard to learn --- it takes a bit of practice to get good, but not too much. I suspect that when I am done with this project, I'll know enough to start. Now, I'm chugging slowly along. Second best advice I got was "JUST START." Quit trying to collect all the tools, learn the skills, get everything in the shop just right ----- Just start. When you hit work stoppage b/c you don't have a tool or don't know what to do, spend the energy solving it. Get the tool. Ask a question to Van's, search the archives of this list, ask the question. Each little hurdle you overcome reinforces that it is actually not that hard. And, you make progress while you learn. One step at a time. To quote someone on this list -- you are NOT building an airplane. You are building the forward spar of the horizontal stabilizer. Keeps it manageable. The empennage seems to be purposefully the first kit b/c it is pretty easy and introduces all kinds of fun concepts -- jigs, rivets, torquing bolts, etc. You learn a lot in a relatively error-forgiving environment (yes, I have started a couple things over already!). I don't have tons of expertise to add to this list, but as a novice, non-builder, average mechanical ability, never done anything like this person, I can tell you that now that I am underway, the confidence and excitement just keeps building. DO IT! Terri Watson Lander, Wyoming RV-6 to 7 empennage, playing with jigs. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Al Grajek" <algrajek(at)msn.com>
Subject: Wanted: Used tools
Date: Jun 02, 2001
I am looking for used tools, and construcion videos. algrajek(at)msn.com 859-296-0244 ----- Original Message ----- From: Kevin Schlosser Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 6:20 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Re: Models of RV Aircraft (Was Models) Try This... http://propellerhead.rcplanet.com/gp_rv-4.jpg The list messed up the address by truncating it. ----- Original Message ----- From: AV8TURDON(at)aol.com Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 2:35 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Re: Models of RV Aircraft (Was Models) I scanned that link and it is wrong. It for creating a web page. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kevin Schlosser" <kevinschlosser(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Builder profile
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Laughing my empennage off :-). The explanations are always worse than the expenditures! ----- Original Message ----- From: Jones, Bryan D. Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:23 AM Subject: RE: RV-List: Builder profile go.com [SNIP] My wife thought my empennage kit was just another giant scale kit for several weeks, at least... after that, the explanations got more tricky. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Pardue" <n5lp(at)carlsbad.net>
Subject: Cougar Landing
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Listers: Well I'm back from Cougar Landing and no one has said anything about it yet. I went to Cougar Landing last year and had a nice time. Well I did get stuck in mud and had to do some scud running, but it was a nice lunch with good people and maybe 8 or so RV's. Doug Reeves decided to promote the fly-in this year and it sort of looked like it was going to outgrow Cougar Landing airstrip so it was decided to move it to Scott Field, near Waco. Well it grew alright! There were over 100 airplanes and 85 RV's that showed up. I have no idea how many cars. I have never seen anything like this before. When I arrived it was a furball of RV's, sorting it all out and making it work. This many airplanes coming into a 1900 foot strip that has tall trees on both ends is a bit different than the traffic into a big airport. As airplanes would land they would quickly be parked among the trees. This was so much nicer than being parked in rows on asphalt. Airplanes were tucked here and there and there was lots of shade. The house has a pool and a beautiful garden; it did make me want to stay. "Check Six" Mark said some of the QB Rockets are now flying. The RV-7 looked fine, the best of any of the Van's demonstrators, with even a touch of purple in the paint job like some other fine looking RV's and a nicely equipped panel. This airplane also has beautiful fuselage seams. If that is how total prepunching works, I like it. There was lots of barbeque, dessert, and iced tea for all. After lunch the departures and formation fly-bys started happening. An ad-hoc tower, on sort of a scaffold, about 2/3 of the distance down the runway, helped sort things out, as gaggles back taxied together, then departed in sequence. Folks; lots of RVing happened. Talking with old friends, showing off, inspecting brochures, eating, meeting new friends, getting inspired, asking questions, critiqueing landings. Pretty nice fly-in. Larry Pardue Carlsbad, NM RV-6 N441LP Flying http://www.carlsbadnm.com/n5lp/index.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Cougar Landing
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Folks, I've got some pictures that I'm willing to send to Doug Reeves to post - (Doug gets to see this twice!). Had a great time - in spite of having to drive in. I did steal some ideas. Thanks to our gracious hosts! Alane & Ralph Capen RV6A N822AR (Reserved) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 02, 2001
From: Kevin Horton <khorton(at)cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: Tank 405 attach angle ???
> >Yet another tank question! Thanks in advance for some help. Because >the nose of the rib is rounded a bit, should I contour the angle some to >fit up to the rib better or force the rib to fit the flat back-side of >the angle? Also, Where can I find the measurements for the slot >cut-out? Thanks again! >Jack in DSM >rv8, tanks > Jack, The slot dimensions are on DWG 43, r2, near the top left. -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (mounting wings) Ottawa, Canada http://eccentrix.com/misc/rv8/rv8.html ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 02, 2001
From: Kevin Horton <khorton(at)cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: c/s prop techniques
> >jim >i forgot about the lycoming flyer, it was in my truck and i didn't take it >out to show you. oops, anyway, thanks for having us experience another >successful engine hanging. >scott > There is a long list of Lycoming articles available on their web site. Is this the same info that is in the Lycoming Flyer? See: http://www.lycoming.textron.com/support/publications/index.html -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (mounting wings) Ottawa, Canada http://eccentrix.com/misc/rv8/rv8.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stephen J. Soule" <SSoule(at)pfclaw.com>
Subject: Canopy Jettison
Date: Jun 02, 2001
I left the canopy jettison feature in my tip up, even though I don't think it would work in flight. I thought it would be good to pull the handle just before making an off field landing. It might make it easier to get out of a bent up airframe if both the canopy jettison handle had been pulled and the canopy release had been unlatched before touchdown. Steve Soule Huntington, Vermont -----Original Message----- One decision that I have been going back and forth on, is the canopy jettison for the -6 tip up. While I think that the circumstances that would lead me to jettisoning the thing in the air are almost non-existent, there is an argument to be made about using it to remove the canopy on the ground. However, how often (really) am I going to be removing the thing, and would it really be that bad to have to reach up and remove two bolts. If it's not a big deal, I really don't want that thing on my panel for a few reasons. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stephen J. Soule" <SSoule(at)pfclaw.com>
Subject: great advice I got when I started building
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Hey Terri, The best advise I got and can give is to do something on your airplane project every day. It doesn't matter what, just keep moving. Steve Soule -----Original Message----- Now, I'm chugging slowly along. Second best advice I got was "JUST START." Quit trying to collect all the tools, learn the skills, get everything in the shop just right ----- Just start. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rick Jory" <rickjory(at)email.msn.com>
Subject: Green Velcro
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Anyone out there ex-military that might have six square inches of both parts of velcro that go on std. military flight suits? If so, please contact me off list. rickjory(at)msn.com Thanks. Rick Jory, Highlands Ranch, CO RV8A ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 02, 2001
From: Ian Jessen <ianbear99(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: electric flap control
i'm dreaming of building an RV-7, and to keep my mind occupied until i can finally start, ive been planning out systems. for the flaps, i'm interested in using a four position (up, 15, 30, 45) preselect switch, problem is, i have no idea how to wire it. i know some people have a problem with the extra "weight" (it cant be more than a few ounces, can it?) and complexity of a flap preselect, but i have my mind set on it. does anyone know how to wire a reliable system that has only one switch? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6bldr(at)home.com>
Subject: Cougar Landing
Date: Jun 02, 2001
I also made it to the Cougar Landing fly-in and if you have RV-itis...this was the place to be! I saw quite a few of the guys who are on the RV-List. It's great to be able to finally put a face to the names. Talked to Bernie Kerr from Florida. He stopped in on his way to Alaska. He came in Friday night and snuck a dip in the nice pool behind Phil's house and set up camp in his tent. Now that's RVing! Bernie has a fantastic 6A. He's using the Control Vision GPS software with the Compaq Ipaq PC and says he really likes it. Saw Larry Pardue's 6..which is another nice one. Didn't catch up with him, but did see him takeoff to head back home. Talked to Mike Thompson who is building a -6. He has just hung his engine and is working on the panel. Met Bryan Jones and his dad(who is building a RV9). Bryan did a super job on his -8..even painted it himself. Terry Cole had his plane busy giving rides. The RV7 and Tom Green were there. It is definately a beauty and there were people around and in it all day. I talked to a couple who are building their RV7 empennage. Their RV7 QB is due to arrive in the near future. There were a couple of different groups of formation flying RV's. Must have been around 8 RV's in very close formation. And of course, got to meet Doug Reeves. He was there with his family...very good people. He took a lot of pictures and mentioned they would be on his web site soon. I honestly believe the high turnout was impacted by Doug's efforts in regards to promoting Cougar Landing on his web site. Thanks Doug! Scott Field is quite interesting. It's a private grass strip about 1900 feet with about 1700 feet usable so there were a few go-arounds, but not too many. Spectators lined both sides of the runway and watched the planes coming and going. As Larry Pardue posted earlier, TREES everwhere! There was an RG Sklane that took off fairly loaded and his gear was going up as he barely cleared the trees. I did hear a few applauds on that one. The strip is actually cut out in a very large patch of Mesquite trees. Plenty of shade and the RV's(close to 100) were nested among the trees. There was a lot of fine people, plenty of Barbeque, and plenty of Texas heat...but the shade made a big difference. Put this fly in on your list for next year..it's a good one! Jerry Calvert Edmond Ok ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Daniel Estrada F." <dani_estrada(at)infosel.net.mx>
Subject: Looking for a GPS
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Hi... Is there someone selling a Garmin 195 GPS... Thanks Daniel EStrada Mexico City RV7A emp. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Shook" <billshook(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Flap hanging difficulties
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Ok, I seem to have lost my mind. In theory, if the flap and aileron trailing edges are to line up and the shape of the airfoil is to be uniform front to back, does the flap and aileron not need to be the same thickness? It would appear that the aileron and flap are not the same thickness, therefore the bottom of the flap will extend below that of the bottom of the aileron. Does this make sense? I've looked at it for long enough now, that I'm pretty sure it seems screwy. Also, in order to insure the top skin of the flap stays in line with the top skin of the wing, it seems as though I have to put a decent amount of pressure on the flap brace, forcing the rear skin and flap hinge downward. Is that how it is supposed to be? I guess I better stop for the night, I'm getting pretty frustrated. Advice would be greatly appreciated. Bill -4 wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ABAYMAN(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Subject: Re: Looking for a GPS
daneil check ebay.com, type in garmin in the search area, there are many there. scott tampa ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 02, 2001
From: Bobby Hester <bhester(at)apex.net>
Subject: Re: RV builders in KY
Al Grajek wrote: > > Are there any RV builders out there in or around Kentucky? > Al Grajek > Lexington, KY 859-296-0244 > algrajek(at)msn.com I just ordered my RV7A empannage :-) -- Surfing the Web from Hopkinsville, KY Visit my web site at: http://www.geocities.com/hester-hoptown/ And see my Rans S12xl experimental aircraft - Awaiting RV7A empannage :-) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill VonDane" <n8vd(at)earthlink.net>
"Rv-List(at)Matronics.Com"
Subject: Cougar Landing Annual Central Texas RV Fly-In Pictures...
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Hi all... Steve Adams sent me some pix from the Cougar Landing Annual Central Texas RV Fly-In, so I posted them for all to see... I can post more if anyone has them, and then I am sure once Doug is free to do so, he will post them on the VAFWWW website... See the pix here: http://vondane.tripod.com/cougar_landing/index.htm Bill VonDane, Colorado Springs, CO RV-8A, N8VD, Plumbing http://vondane.com/rv8a/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: TColeE(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Subject: Cougar landing
I would like to take time to thank the hosts Mide Anderson and Phil Grisham for for all the work that went into making Cougar Landing a big sucess. Thank you Mike and Phil. Also would like to thank Van's aircraft and Tom Green for their time and expertise for taking a big interest in RV flyers and builders. Thank you Doug Reeves for the work in promoting this GREAT get together. Just wait until next year. Hope everyone in attendence had as good a time as I did. Try and do somethin on the plane every day and it will soon be in the air.There are a lot of little things to do and if you just keep going and stay motivated, it won't take long and you will be flying. If you need motivation contact of list, I'll tell you some stories of people that helped keep me going. Terrry E. Cole N468TC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill VonDane" <n8vd(at)earthlink.net>
"Rv-List(at)Matronics.Com"
Subject: Oil Pump AD Madness!
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Any body out there willing to help me determine if the all the oil pump AD stuff has been done to my engine? I am starting to get a headache looking through this stuff... Thanks in advance... Bill VonDane, Colorado Springs, CO RV-8A, N8VD, Plumbing http://vondane.com/rv8a/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 02, 2001
From: Roy Glass <rlglass(at)alaska.net>
Subject: Re: Canopy Jettison
One needs at least about half the mechanism because you won't be able to reach the two bolts once the top skin is on. There are many ways of finishing the second half. roy glass, t/u canopy cut, now looking for excuses not to drill Keith Hughes wrote: > > > One decision that I have been going back and forth on, is the canopy > jettison for the -6 tip up. While I think that the circumstances that would > lead me to jettisoning the thing in the air are almost non-existent, there > is an argument to be made about using it to remove the canopy on the ground. > However, how often (really) am I going to be removing the thing, and would > it really be that bad to have to reach up and remove two bolts. If it's not > a big deal, I really don't want that thing on my panel for a few reasons. > > Could those of you that have been through this weigh in and let me know what > you've found through experience or what has run through your mind in making > your decision. > > Thanks, > > Keith Hughes > RV-6 finish > Parker, CO > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 02, 2001
Subject: Re: Lyc. Fuel Pump Gasket
From: "Denis (Bum) Walsh" <deniswalsh(at)earthlink.net>
on 6/2/01 5:06, RVer273sb(at)aol.com at RVer273sb(at)aol.com wrote: > > Make sure you get the pump push rod properly > located on the pump arm! > Stewart RV4 N273SB > Hey Stew, did you goet the mystery solved Yet?? Inquiring minds wnat to know. I still don't have a clue (other than the last hint on sucking air). I am still operatign on a hand held radio. F--ng maintenance people. Denis ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Alex Peterson" <alexpeterson(at)usjet.net>
Subject: Re: Flap hanging difficulties
Date: Jun 02, 2001
> Also, in order to insure the top skin of the flap stays in line with the top > skin of the wing, it seems as though I have to put a decent amount of > pressure on the flap brace, forcing the rear skin and flap hinge downward. > Is that how it is supposed to be? I guess I better stop for the night, I'm > getting pretty frustrated. Advice would be greatly appreciated. > > Bill > -4 wings This problem seems to persist on the 4's and 6's. The cause seems to be that the vertical height of the rear spar is not enough. I put the deflection in the bottom skin, and kept the top skin following the contour of the airfoil. The end result is that the bottom skin departs upward from the airfoil right at the rear spar, then comes back down at the flap hinge line. Use your airfoil templates. Look at completed RV's, most have this problem. Alex Peterson Maple Grove, MN 6A ------ http://USFamily.Net/info - Unlimited Internet - From $8.99/mo! ------ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 03, 2001
From: Ted <blunist(at)flash.net>
Subject: Free Fuse Jig
I will give my RV6 Fuselage Jig to the first builder who picks it up. This is a really nice jig. Ted Gauthier Pontiac, Michigan blunist(at)flash.net 1-248-681-8184 hm 1-248-400-6237 pager 1-248-249-1780 cell ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Norman, MD" <jnorman(at)InterMapSystems.com>
Subject: Free wood crate for Lycoming
Date: Jun 03, 2001
Free to anybody who comes to get it. A very nice, very sturdy crate for a Lycoming. Completely enclosed wood top put together with secrews and braces, the bottom is a pallet made of 2x4s and 2x6s, steel mounts to secure engine to pallet. All mounting bolts & hardware. Will fit O-320, O-360 angle valve and parallel valve models. Located in Tampa FL. Jim ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John & Teresa Huft" <widgeon92L(at)email.msn.com>
Subject: what if?
Date: Jun 03, 2001
I spent a while this morning trying to post some pictures Rick Jory sent of his seats, on my website at homestead. Even though I have done this many times before, it has suddenly quit working. This got me to thinking (always dangerous). What if Microsoft built our airplanes? We would be flying along, and suddenly something would quit working. Like, say, the ailerons. We would have to land, shut down, everyone get out, tie the airplane down, and walk away. Then, we could go back, untie the airplane, get in, start up, take off, and everything would work fine! What a concept! John ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GRENIER(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 03, 2001
Subject: Tail wheel product.
A few weeks ago a builder from Canada offered a tail wheel steering device for sale that replace the springs and chains. I have lost his name and e-mail address. Can anyone help? Thanks Ray Grenier RV-4 the endless last 90% ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 03, 2001
Subject: Re: Lycoming Manual
In a message dated 6/2/01 7:46:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time, dbentley(at)fuse.net writes: << I called Builder's Bookstore and they have the OH Manual reprint. When I asked about the Parts Catalog, PC-106, they responded with "oh, you mean PC -306-1. I went into the Lycoming web page and found the PC-106 is for "Std cyl flange" and the 306-1 is the "Wide flange". I have an 0-360-A1A built in December 2000. How do I find out if it is "Std" or "Wide"? >> Correctamundo. I did some research. The Skyranch Engineering manual says that if your engine S/N ends with an "A" then it is of the Wide Deck/Flange type. So I guess that I need to get the PC-306-1 Manual too. I bought it thru Chief Aircraft and their catalog listing did not differentiate between wide and standard flange (wide and narrow deck). Anyone need a good manual for the narrow deck? -GV (RV-6A N1GV) vanremog(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Brick" <jbrick(at)wolfenet.com>
Subject: Flap hanging difficulties
Date: Jun 03, 2001
I put the flap hinge between the flap brace and the bottom skin. I think the plans showed the hinge on top of the flap brace. I suppose you could bend the hinge eyes to adjust the vertical location...I didn't. jb RV-4 fairings Graham, WA -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Alex Peterson Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 9:11 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Flap hanging difficulties > Also, in order to insure the top skin of the flap stays in line with the top > skin of the wing, it seems as though I have to put a decent amount of > pressure on the flap brace, forcing the rear skin and flap hinge downward. > Is that how it is supposed to be? I guess I better stop for the night, I'm > getting pretty frustrated. Advice would be greatly appreciated. > > Bill > -4 wings This problem seems to persist on the 4's and 6's. The cause seems to be that the vertical height of the rear spar is not enough. I put the deflection in the bottom skin, and kept the top skin following the contour of the airfoil. The end result is that the bottom skin departs upward from the airfoil right at the rear spar, then comes back down at the flap hinge line. Use your airfoil templates. Look at completed RV's, most have this problem. Alex Peterson Maple Grove, MN 6A ------ http://USFamily.Net/info - Unlimited Internet - From $8.99/mo! ------ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Textor" <pincjt(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Anti-rotation bracket
Date: Jun 04, 2001
Hello again, Van's specifies .125 x 1" x 1" angle for the bracket. May I use hardware store variety angle? Once again this weekend, THANKS! Jack DSM tanks, tanks, tanks ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kevin Schlosser" <kevinschlosser(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: electric flap control
Date: Jun 03, 2001
I've been thinking about similar setups. It can be done with a home-grown circuit with one of the linear servo position transducers that hooks up to the trim servos feeding back position information to a PIC microcontroller programmed to move the flap to a preset position based on which pair of contacts on a rotary switch are closed. I'm messing around with the idea and can't decide whether to do it this way or just have my flap deployment switch on my stick set for momentary on-off-on to manually deploy the flaps at whatever angle I want with the same sensor feeding a simple led bar graph display for visual confirmation of position. Since I haven't flown an RV yet, I won't know what positions are needed yet. I'd probably fly it for a while, develop my habits, and add the controller later. Here's the position indicators and transducers I'm looking at... http://www.rayallencompany.com/products/indsens.html ----- Original Message ----- From: Ian Jessen Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 9:48 PM Subject: RV-List: electric flap control i'm dreaming of building an RV-7, and to keep my mind occupied until i can finally start, ive been planning out systems. for the flaps, i'm interested in using a four position (up, 15, 30, 45) preselect switch, problem is, i have no idea how to wire it. i know some people have a problem with the extra "weight" (it cant be more than a few ounces, can it?) and complexity of a flap preselect, but i have my mind set on it. does anyone know how to wire a reliable system that has only one switch? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kevin Schlosser" <kevinschlosser(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Free Fuse Jig
Date: Jun 03, 2001
How's it made? ----- Original Message ----- From: Ted Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 8:16 AM Subject: RV-List: Free Fuse Jig I will give my RV6 Fuselage Jig to the first builder who picks it up. This is a really nice jig. Ted Gauthier Pontiac, Michigan blunist(at)flash.net 1-248-681-8184 hm 1-248-400-6237 pager 1-248-249-1780 cell ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Nellis" <mnellis(at)peoplepc.com>
Subject: Re: Tail wheel product.
Date: Jun 03, 2001
Try this. http://www.iwantarocket.com/ Mike Nellis Plainfield, IL RV6 N699BM (res) Building Flaps Stinson 108-2 N9666K ----- Original Message ----- From: <GRENIER(at)aol.com> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 9:30 AM Subject: RV-List: Tail wheel product. > > A few weeks ago a builder from Canada offered a tail wheel steering device > for sale that replace the springs and chains. I have lost his name and > e-mail address. Can anyone help? > Thanks Ray Grenier > RV-4 the endless last 90% > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JVanLaak(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 03, 2001
Subject: Re: electric flap control
My two cents: Deploying flaps incrementally is usually done for one of a few good reasons: 1. Because they introduce a great deal of drag that my not be appropriate for all circumstances, especially if they will complicate a go around. 2. Because they introduce a significant trim change that needs to be controlled with trim movement or by slowing down and which likewise could complicate a go around. 3. Because they can then be deployed across a larger speed range, usually to aid in slowing down. SInce the RV flaps are not big drag devices and the planes have lots of power to overcome the drag on a go around, and since there is little trim change from flap deployment at least in the 3 planes I have owned (RV3, 4, and my current 6) that is easily controlled regardless of the flap position or power level, I would not put the circuit in from a functional point of view. I occassionally put out "two potatoes" worth of flaps slightly above the flap speed to help slow down the last few mph when I get behind in the pattern, but that does not require complicated circuitry to control. Of course, if it is fun for you to design and install, have at it, since the weight is low. But from my point of view I really like the simplicity of the RV series and like to keep things simple and reliable so I can fly when I want to, not spend my time fixing things. One thing about switches on the stick. There is an old tradition in aircraft design to segregate switches that can do bad things so that they are not easily activated accidentally. That is why fighters usually have pickle switches and gun triggers on the stick and intercom push to talk, transmit buttons and speedbrakes on the throttles. There is a delightful little switch on my stick grip right under my thumb that would be fine for deploying the flaps, except I might absentmindedly play with it or bump it at cruise or during aerobatics, and deploying the flaps at twice their design operating speed would be a bad idea. So I left the flap control on the panel where I have to reach for it. Jim N1KJ RV6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Are Barstad" <abarstad(at)sympatico.ca>
Subject: Anti-rotation bracket
Date: Jun 03, 2001
Jack, I cut out the anti-rotation brackets from angle stock that came with the wing kit. It is meant to be used to make the FL-406A flap angle. *From what I can see*, there's enough for 2 anti-rotation brackets plus both flap angles. This is also the correct thickness (1/8"). This angle stock is listed in the parts list as: AA6-125X1 1/2X2X10 Hope this helps, Are RV-8 Wings -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Jack Textor Sent: June 4, 2001 3:28 PM Subject: RV-List: Anti-rotation bracket Hello again, Van's specifies .125 x 1" x 1" angle for the bracket. May I use hardware store variety angle? Once again this weekend, THANKS! Jack DSM tanks, tanks, tanks ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 03, 2001
From: "jdnewsum" <jdnewsum(at)qwest.net>
Subject: electric flap control
Ian Take a look at the flap control circuit that Ted French used in his RV6. I listed the URL for his builder site below. Dave http://www3.telus.net/elfrench/aircraft.html -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Ian Jessen Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 6:08 PM Subject: RV-List: electric flap control i'm dreaming of building an RV-7, and to keep my mind occupied until i can finally start, ive been planning out systems. for the flaps, i'm interested in using a four position (up, 15, 30, 45) preselect switch, problem is, i have no idea how to wire it. i know some people have a problem with the extra "weight" (it cant be more than a few ounces, can it?) and complexity of a flap preselect, but i have my mind set on it. does anyone know how to wire a reliable system that has only one switch? ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Cougar Landing Thank You From Doug R.
Date: Jun 03, 2001
Thread-Topic: Cougar Landing Thank You From Doug R. Thread-Index: AcDsXK/Im70b1CQsTe2diIySFXzhCQ=
From: "Reeves, Doug" <Douglas.Reeves(at)archongroup.com>
Hi everybody, I just got back to Dallas from Waco. I picked up Tom Green at his hotel at 7:30am this morning (Sunday) and he was airborne in the RV-7 headed for Oregon at 7:55am. He was one of the first ten to arrive on Saturday morning and the absolute last to leave. I took 158 pictures and will be loading them up in the next 24-48 hours (on my work lunch hour) with a well thought out thank you paragraph. Over 50 of them are panel shots. Mike Anderson, Bonnie (his wife), Tom Green and I spent Saturday night at dinner talking over ways to make next year's event even better (published arrival procedures, etc.). I'm going to spend the rest of the day doing whatever my wife says, as she spent the weekend juggling the kids so I could play airplane. Proper thank you in the works to all those involved. There were too many to count. Stay tuned. Best regards, Doug Reeves Van's Air Force - World Wide Wing http://www.vansaircraft.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 03, 2001
From: ripsteel(at)edge.net (Mark Phillips)
Subject: Re: Anti-rotation bracket
Jack- Take a piece of .040 about an inch wide and about 4" long, drill a hole in one end for the pickup tube fitting where it passes through the end rib- this serves as the "spacer" you have to put under the fitting anyway. Arrange it so it hangs down from the fitting, bend the bottom end out at a right angle and make the "fork" to fit the fuel tube for anti-rotate. Make the bend far enough away from the fitting so you can remove the tube if necessary during fitting, although I prosealed the outside of the tubing nut and fitting to the rib before final tank closing. One 426-3 rivet in the middle will hold it in place along with the fitting nut (don't forget to seal this too) . I can send a photo if you like. From the PossumWorks in TN Mark Phillips - fussing with fuselage, (now obsolete!) -6A Jack Textor wrote: > > Hello again, > Van's specifies .125 x 1" x 1" angle for the bracket. May I use > hardware store variety angle? Once again this weekend, THANKS! > Jack > DSM > tanks, tanks, tanks > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 03, 2001
From: Dean <dweb5(at)adams.net>
Subject:
unsubscribe dweb5(at)adams.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RVer273sb(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 03, 2001
Subject: fuel pressure
Listers, My fuel pressure problem is alive and well. I have tried everything I can think to do. I have pressure and vaccumm leaked checked all lines,fittings and components. Twice that is. Saturday I completely tore down the boost pump assbly, check and press relief valves. Inspected, assembled andpressure checked the assbly. Every thing works as it is supposed to.I also left the B/pump assbly out and directly hooked up the eng pump to the fuel line from the fuel selector, It took some time to get the eng started but it ran well, good pressure ect. The only thing is I didn't dare fly it that way, without a boost pump! This pressure fluctuation has rarely reared its ugly head on the ground. I have proved that the boost pump and the eng pump operate correctly on the ground. So I do not have a vent or fuel line problem. Next course of action? Try a new eng pump in flight. Stewart RV4 CO. N273SB ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 03, 2001
From: Thomas Velvick <tomvelvick(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Free wood crate for Lycoming
Would you ship it to me if I pay shipping? Regards, Tom Velvick Peoria, AZ 623-979-2519 >Free to anybody who comes to get it. > >A very nice, very sturdy crate for a Lycoming. Completely enclosed wood top >put together with secrews and braces, the bottom is a pallet made of 2x4s >and 2x6s, steel mounts to secure engine to pallet. All mounting bolts & >hardware. Will fit O-320, O-360 angle valve and parallel valve models. > >Located in Tampa FL. > >Jim > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 03, 2001
From: "Boyd C. Braem" <bcbraem(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: fuel pressure pump failure list
Stewart-- I don't know if this applies to you but there is a FAA Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin, reffering to Lycoming's Service Bulletin SB #548 concerning Lycoming fuel pumps for the pumps LW-15472, 15473 and 16335, due to internal failure of the pumps produced between 9/18/2000 and 2/8/2001, inclusive. The sequence of numbers is: 1. the Lycoming p/n 2. the date code 3. if the suffix "A" appears (at the end of the numbers inscribed on the pump mounting flange) the pump has supoosedly already been repaired by the manufacturer. Pumps affected contain the date codes: 3900, 4000, 4100, 4200, 4300, 4400, 4500, 4600, 4700, 4800, 4900, 5000, 5100, 5200, 0101, 0201, 0301, and 0401. Contact Lycoming at 1.570.323.6181. Boyd Braem Rv-Super 6 RVer273sb(at)aol.com wrote: > > > Listers, > My fuel pressure problem is alive and well. I have tried everything I can > think to do. > I have pressure and vaccumm leaked checked all lines,fittings and components. > Twice that is. Saturday I completely tore down the boost pump assbly, check > and press relief valves. Inspected, assembled andpressure checked the assbly. > Every thing works as it is supposed to.I also left the B/pump assbly out and > directly hooked up the eng pump to the fuel line from the fuel selector, It > took some time to get the eng started but it ran well, good pressure ect. The > only thing is I didn't dare fly it that way, without a boost pump! This > pressure fluctuation has rarely reared its ugly head on the ground. > I have proved that the boost pump and the eng pump operate correctly on the > ground. > So I do not have a vent or fuel line problem. > Next course of action? Try a new eng pump in flight. > Stewart RV4 CO. N273SB > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ENewton57(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 03, 2001
Subject: cowl hinges (again)
Hi all, I have a couple of questions (again) about the cowl hinges (RV-6A). First, someone wrote me and said that it is in the manual about substituting the stainless steel hinge pins for the aluminum ones. Whoever that was, please send me the page number again if you don't mind. I can't find it in my manual or plans. Second question, the Orndorff tape shows bonding the hinges on with some fiberglass strips and resin. Again, I find no mention of this in my manual or plans. Am I missing a page or what? I suspect the plans may have changed a little with the introduction of the Epoxy "S" cowl that came with my year 2000 kit. Thanks for the help, Eric Newton - Long Beach, Mississippi RV-6A N57ME (Reserved) (Engine Cowling) http://www.ericsrv6a.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kevin Schlosser" <kevinschlosser(at)msn.com>
Subject: Wife's strange question...
Date: Jun 03, 2001
Well now... :-) The wife asked me this morning if there were airplane shows to go to. "You know, like the boat shows and stuff." I told her about Sun-N-Fun and Oshkosh. She was wondering if there was anything more local near New Jersey in the next few months. Is there? NJ/PA/Delaware/VA ??? Imagine that! -< PropellerHead >- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ross" <rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Micromonitor oil temp probe location
Date: Jun 03, 2001
> I was wondering if some of the micromonitor users out there can tell me > where they located their oil temperature probe? I need to find out what > plug I need. I have a new O-360. The probe fits in the very back, top center into the oil filter adapter. Ross. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6bldr(at)home.com>
Subject: Altitude encoder installation
Date: Jun 03, 2001
I am trying to figure the best place to mount the altitude encoder in my -6. There are two small adjustment screws on the side of it and I am guessing that it may need some fine tuning when the transponder is being checked. I have come up with a way to mount it behind the instrument sub-panel on a hinged bracket so it will drop down for easy(?) access. Comments?? Jerry Calvert Edmond Ok -6 finish kit ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 03, 2001
From: Dave Bristol <bj034(at)lafn.org>
Subject: Re: cowl hinges (again)
Eric, It wasn't me, but it's on page 6 of section 12 in my book, to the right of SK-99. "The lower hinge pins are to be the 1/8" dia. hardened stainless steel wire supplied separate with the kit. The pin which is supplied by the hinge manufacturer is soft aluminum and is inadequate for our purposes...." Dave ENewton57(at)aol.com wrote: > > Hi all, > I have a couple of questions (again) about the cowl hinges (RV-6A). First, > someone wrote me and said that it is in the manual about substituting the > stainless steel hinge pins for the aluminum ones. Whoever that was, please > send me the page number again if you don't mind. I can't find it in my manual > or plans. > Second question, the Orndorff tape shows bonding the hinges on with some > fiberglass strips and resin. Again, I find no mention of this in my manual > or plans. Am I missing a page or what? I suspect the plans may have changed > a little with the introduction of the Epoxy "S" cowl that came with my year > 2000 kit. > > Thanks for the help, > Eric Newton - Long Beach, Mississippi > RV-6A N57ME (Reserved) (Engine Cowling) > http://www.ericsrv6a.com > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 03, 2001
From: doyal plute <dplute(at)onemain.com>
Subject: Compass location:
I am starting on my panel layout on my RV6A and I have a question: I am contemplating mounting my compass in the lower left corner of my panel. Has anyone mounted their compass here, and if so what were the results? Was it satisfactory or did it show a lot of deviation? My original plan was to mount the compass top center in panel ,but that put it within 6 inches of radio stack, which Vans says is to close. Sincerely: Doyal Plute N4dp resv. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Burton" <dburton(at)nwlink.com>
Subject: Re: Wife's strange question...
Date: Jun 03, 2001
Hi Kevin, Next weekend, http://www.vaeaa.org/ Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Schlosser" <kevinschlosser(at)msn.com> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 7:14 PM Subject: RV-List: Wife's strange question... > > Well now... :-) The wife asked me this morning if there were airplane sh> ows to go to. "You know, like the boat shows and stuff." I told her abo> ut Sun-N-Fun and Oshkosh. She was wondering if there was anything more l> ocal near New Jersey in the next few months. Is there? NJ/PA/Delaware/V> A ??? > > Imagine that! > > -< PropellerHead >- > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6bldr(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Compass location:
Date: Jun 03, 2001
That's where I originally wanted mine, but my electric turn coordinator swung the compass 90 degrees. Before you cut any holes, test your compass next to EVERYTHING that will be in that general area and see if it is affected. Jerry Calvert Edmond Ok -6 finish kit ----- Original Message ----- From: doyal plute <dplute(at)onemain.com> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 10:18 PM Subject: RV-List: Compass location: > > I am starting on my panel layout on my RV6A and I have a question: > I am contemplating mounting my compass in the lower left corner of my > panel. > Has anyone mounted their compass here, and if so what were the results? > Was it satisfactory or did it show a lot of deviation? My original plan > was to mount the compass top center in panel ,but that put it within 6 > inches of radio stack, which Vans says is to close. > Sincerely: > Doyal Plute N4dp resv. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 03, 2001
From: "Gary A. Sobek" <rv6flier(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Compass location:
--- doyal plute wrote: > I am starting on my panel layout on my RV6A and I have a question: > I am contemplating mounting my compass in the lower left corner of my > panel. > Has anyone mounted their compass here, and if so what were the > results? > Was it satisfactory or did it show a lot of deviation? My original > plan > was to mount the compass top center in panel ,but that put it within > 6 > inches of radio stack, which Vans says is to close. > Sincerely: > Doyal Plute N4dp resv. > Doyal: I have my compass mounted in the upper left hand side of the panel. It is directly above my electric clock and near the turn coordinator. I tested this set up on the bench before trying it. It added 2 degrees error to the compass. Been flying with this setup for 3.5 years, 814 hours and it works great. ==== Gary A. Sobek "My Sanity" RV-6 N157GS O-320 Hartzell, 814+ Flying Hours So. CA, USA http://SoCAL_WVAF.tripod.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 04, 2001
From: Larry & Karen Gooding <GOODING(at)hargray.com>
Subject: Re: Wife's strange question...
Kevin, Sentimental Journey is at Loch Haven, PA, June 20-23. This is the year of the Vagabonds (PA-15, PA-17) and all the little Cubs will be flying home to the Piper Factory where they were born. Women love Cubs... I have two. Karen Gooding PA-17, PJ-3S ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Donald R. Eaves" <doneaves(at)bigfoot.com>
Subject: Tail wheel product.
Date: Jun 04, 2001
Here is the link to his web site & email: http://www.iwantarocket.com/ -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of GRENIER(at)aol.com Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 9:31 AM Subject: RV-List: Tail wheel product. A few weeks ago a builder from Canada offered a tail wheel steering device for sale that replace the springs and chains. I have lost his name and e-mail address. Can anyone help? Thanks Ray Grenier RV-4 the endless last 90% ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Charles Rowbotham" <crowbotham(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Wife's strange question...
Date: Jun 04, 2001
Kevin, You are lucky to have a wife who is interested in airplanes. EAA Chapter # 486 (Fulton, NY) (Oswego airport) has there annual RV-Forum in September. The forums are RV based and very good. In addition, the RV turn out is usually very good with many of the RVs giving rides. Mike Seger also usually attends and offers transition flights. The dates are Saturday (9/15) and Sunday (9/16) starting at 9 AM with breakfeast/lunch and dinner. Their web site is WWW.web-flight.com/486. Good Building, Chuck & Dave Rowbotham RV-8A - Wings painted & Installed Niantic, CT (Westerly airport) >Well now... :-) The wife asked me this morning if there were airplane sh>ows to go to. "You know, like the boat shows and stuff." I told her abo>ut Sun-N-Fun and Oshkosh. She was wondering if there was anything more l>ocal near New Jersey in the next few months. Is there? NJ/PA/Delaware/V>A ??? > >Imagine that! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wes" <whays(at)camalott.com>
Subject: Re: Micromonitor oil temp probe location
Date: Jun 04, 2001
Ross, George Orndorff has a plug that is made for the temp probe. It works great with my uMonitor. He is in the Yeller Pages. Wes Hays N844WB Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: 270+ Cougar Landing RV Fly-In Images Now Online
Date: Jun 04, 2001
Thread-Topic: 270+ Cougar Landing RV Fly-In Images Now Online Thread-Index: AcDs9jJGcg0OIAPZTS21Y68O5C/Hmw=
From: "Reeves, Doug" <Douglas.Reeves(at)archongroup.com>
Hi everybody, I've finished writing a proper thank you for the event and upload the images I took. Don Parsons also took over a hundred INCREDIBLE pictures and I linked to them also. You can jump directly to the page at: http://www.metronet.com/~dreeves/CougarLanding/cougarlanding.htm <http://www.metronet.com/~dreeves/CougarLanding/cougarlanding.htm> Again, thanks to everyone who flew or drove in. It was a wonderful weekend. If you couldn't make it, please do next year. Kindest regards, Doug Reeves Van's Air Force - World Wide Wing http://www.vansaircraft.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Johnny Johnson" <Johnny(at)wiktel.com>
Subject: Constant speed props
Date: Jun 04, 2001
A couple of days ago, I passed along a memory-jogger used in my Navy days: > > When adding power start with the shortest [lever] and go > > uphill: Mixture, prop, throttle. > > Pulling power start with the longest [lever] and > > go downhill: throttle, prop, mixture. I guess this illustrates the hazard of sharing personal memory joggers because everyone's background is different, and perhaps I didn't amplify enough. "Pulling power--go downhill" is NOT used in setting up for landing. "Downhill" is for any higher power to lower power _setting_ (such as setting cruise power after climbout, or preparing to descend, etc etc). I assumed everyone would understand that the landing jogger is the "uphill" one, but I can see from list activity that it is not so clear in everyone's mind... As Boyd correctly pointed out, for landing you want to be ready to _set_ full power at will... which means you want to have all of the "uphill" done except for the throttle. If you're cruising along, prop back, mixture leaned (cruise power _set_) and bam...you get jumped by a hostile MIG or RV, then the "Adding power--go uphill" will please your engine as you _set_ full power for the chase... also applies when you want to climb to a different cruise altitude, etc, etc... any lower power to higher power _setting_. Rigid adherence to these procedures may not be too important to our normally-aspirated engines, but we might as well baby our Lycosaurs all we can... besides, you'll be primed for the time you have a 70"-capable airplane to fly, confident that you won't overboost... :=)) Sorry for any confusion this may have caused... lashes will be administered. If it's still clear as mud, maybe someone more articulate than I can help out here... Johnny Johnson 49MM -3 flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Robert Moore" <robm440(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Looking for a GPS
Date: Jun 04, 2001
Daniel check out Ebay.com, I have seen some good deals on several Garmin GPSs Rob >Hi... > >Is there someone selling a Garmin 195 GPS... > > >Thanks > > >Daniel EStrada >Mexico City >RV7A emp. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Nav/vor antena on wing tips
Date: Jun 04, 2001
Thread-Topic: RV-List: Nav/vor antena on wing tips Thread-Index: AcDslpxfWV2tFpYBTkqdTl9PdlDmxQAaO43g
From: "Bob Japundza" <Bob.Japundza(at)realmed.com>
Electric Bob has a section in his book devoted to the wingtip antenna, along with instructions and a diagram on how to build them. You should be able to make one for less than $5.00 in parts. A friend of mine has a wingtip VOR antenna says it works well, but there are dead spots. He has the glideslope antenna in one wing and the VOR antenna in the other. Bob Japundza RV-6 N244BJ O-360C/S flying 148 hours ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ken Harrill <KHarrill(at)osa.state.sc.us>
Subject: AD Applicability
Date: Jun 04, 2001
"Das Fed" and others, Am I correct is assuming that AD's do not apply to Experimental aircraft? An AI friend recently made reference to a spar AD on a Pitts homebuilt. What gives? Ken Harrill RV - 6, electrical ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kevin Schlosser" <kevinschlosser(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Wife's strange question...
Date: Jun 04, 2001
Perfect! It even doesn't collide with Rhinebeck. Well, my wife really isn't interested in airplanes. Most times, when you mention them, she just rolls her eyes and says "Uh huh." I think she just wants to see what she's setting herself up for by accepting that I'm going to build one. Maybe if I could get her a demo ride, she'll be ok. Heck, why should she have all the fun, I'd like one too :-). -< PropellerHead >- ----- Original Message ----- From: Charles Rowbotham Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 8:54 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: Wife's strange question... m> Kevin, You are lucky to have a wife who is interested in airplanes. EAA Chapter # 486 (Fulton, NY) (Oswego airport) has there annual RV-Forum in September. The forums are RV based and very good. In addition, the RV turn out is usually very good with many of the RVs giving rides. Mike Seger also usually attends and offers transition flights. The dates are Saturday (9/15) and Sunday (9/16) starting at 9 AM with breakfeast/lunch and dinner. Their web site is WWW.web-flight.com/486. Good Building, Chuck & Dave Rowbotham RV-8A - Wings painted & Installed Niantic, CT (Westerly airport) >Well now... :-) The wife asked me this morning if there were airplane sh >ows to go to. "You know, like the boat shows and stuff." I told her abo >ut Sun-N-Fun and Oshkosh. She was wondering if there was anything more l >ocal near New Jersey in the next few months. Is there? NJ/PA/Delaware/V >A ??? > >Imagine that! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: AD Applicability
Date: Jun 04, 2001
If there is an AD, it is on the certified model. It does NOT apply to the homebuilt as ADs are not issued on Home builts. HOWEVER, if the construction is the same, it would be wise to check to see if there is a problem on the homebuilt. Cy Galley Editor, EAA Safety Programs cgalley(at)qcbc.org or experimenter(at)eaa.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Harrill" <KHarrill(at)osa.state.sc.us> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 9:54 AM Subject: RV-List: AD Applicability "Das Fed" and others, Am I correct is assuming that AD's do not apply to Experimental aircraft? An AI friend recently made reference to a spar AD on a Pitts homebuilt. What gives? Ken Harrill RV - 6, electrical ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 04, 2001
From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 04, 2001
From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 04, 2001
From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 04, 2001
From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 04, 2001
From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 04, 2001
From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tim Lewis" <timrv6a(at)earthlink.net>
Date: Jun 04, 2001
Subject: Re: RV6-List: Compass location:
I mounted mine above the "basic 6" instruments. It works OK. I was able to swing it to within a couple of degrees. The problem is, when I turn on the landing lights, taxi lights, and/or the pitot heat, the compass swings up to 30 degrees. Even the panel lights cause it to swing. The wires for all these functions (except the panel lights) run along the bottom of the panel, while the compass is at the top of the panel. More separation would reduce the effect, therefore I recommend you consider mounting the compass on the canopy support (assuming you have a slider) to increase the distance between the compass and the high-current wiring of lights and pitot heat. Tim On 3 Jun 2001, at 22:18, doyal plute wrote: > --> RV6-List message posted by: doyal plute > > I am starting on my panel layout on my RV6A and I have a question: I > am contemplating mounting my compass in the lower left corner of my > panel. Has anyone mounted their compass here, and if so what were the > results? Was it satisfactory or did it show a lot of deviation? My > original plan was to mount the compass top center in panel ,but that > put it within 6 inches of radio stack, which Vans says is to close. > Sincerely: Doyal Plute N4dp resv. > > > > > > ****** Tim Lewis -- Springfield VA RV-6A N47TD - First Flight 18 Dec 99 http://www.geocities.com/timrv6a ****** ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Al Grajek" <algrajek(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Free Fuse Jig
Date: Jun 04, 2001
Kevin. Will this work on a 7 or 8? ----- Original Message ----- From: Kevin Schlosser Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 9:12 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: Free Fuse Jig How's it made? ----- Original Message ----- From: Ted Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 8:16 AM Subject: RV-List: Free Fuse Jig I will give my RV6 Fuselage Jig to the first builder who picks it up. This is a really nice jig. Ted Gauthier Pontiac, Michigan blunist(at)flash.net 1-248-681-8184 hm 1-248-400-6237 pager 1-248-249-1780 cell ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: AD Applicability
Date: Jun 04, 2001
If there is an AD, it is on the certified model. It does NOT apply to the homebuilt as ADs are not issued on Home builts. HOWEVER, if the construction is the same, it would be wise to check to see if there is a problem on the homebuilt. Cy Galley Editor, EAA Safety Programs cgalley(at)qcbc.org or experimenter(at)eaa.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Harrill" <KHarrill(at)osa.state.sc.us> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 9:54 AM Subject: RV-List: AD Applicability "Das Fed" and others, Am I correct is assuming that AD's do not apply to Experimental aircraft? An AI friend recently made reference to a spar AD on a Pitts homebuilt. What gives? Ken Harrill RV - 6, electrical ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ross Mickey" <rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Tyler Feldman Photo's
Date: Jun 04, 2001
Does anyone have pictures on the net of Tyler Feldman's Award Winning RV-6? My searching has turned up nothing and the archives seem to be down. Ross RV-6A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Weiler" <doug.weiler(at)pressenter.com>
Subject: RV-6 wanted
Date: Jun 04, 2001
Fellow Listers: If anyone knows of a high-quality RV-6 for sale, I may have a potential interested party. Contact me off list. Doug, MN Wing ================ Doug Weiler Hudson, WI 715-386-1239 dougweil(at)pressenter.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 04, 2001
From: "Boyd C. Braem" <bcbraem(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: AD Applicability
AD applicability is addressed in AC 39-7C. A "general" AD: "Unless specifically stated, AD's apply to the make and model set forth in the applicability statement REGARDLESS OF THE CLASSIFICATION OR CATEGORY OF THE AIRWORTHINESS CERTIFICATE ISSUED FOR THE AIRCRAFT." (ie, this includes experimental aircraft) 8.c. states that some AD's may be specifically worded to exclude aircraft with experimental airworthiness certificates. So, you have to read the AD to find out if it pertains to your experimental, or not. Boyd Braem Ken Harrill wrote: > > > "Das Fed" and others, > > Am I correct is assuming that AD's do not apply to Experimental aircraft? > An AI friend recently made reference to a spar AD on a Pitts homebuilt. > What gives? > > Ken Harrill > RV - 6, electrical > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RVer273sb(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 04, 2001
Subject: Re: AD Applicability
Ken, It could be that it was a factory built Pitts and was type certificated. Even if it was a home built I would tend to adhear to an AD on spars! Stewart RV4 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Im7shannon(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 04, 2001
Subject: Seattle area CFI
Are there any CFI's with an RV in the Seattle area? I need to get transition training and checkride soon. Anyone have an address or number for Jerry VanGrunsven? I found Mike Seager in the Yellar Pages Kevin Shannon 9A in WA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Thomas Mosher" <tgmosher(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: AD Applicability
Date: Jun 04, 2001
The Pitts S-1S, S-1T, S-2, S-2A, S-2S, S-2B, and S-2C are all type certificated aircraft - TCDS A8SO which is currently held by Sky International, Inc. of Afton, WA. Therefore, the AD applies. Tom Mosher ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Harrill" <KHarrill(at)osa.state.sc.us> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 9:54 AM Subject: RV-List: AD Applicability > > "Das Fed" and others, > > Am I correct is assuming that AD's do not apply to Experimental aircraft? > An AI friend recently made reference to a spar AD on a Pitts homebuilt. > What gives? > > > Ken Harrill > RV - 6, electrical > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 04, 2001
Subject: Altitude encoder installation
From: Don Jordan <dons6a(at)juno.com>
Sorry I missed you at Waco. I mounted mine looking down on the RH F646 rib. It was a short run to the Transponder & they can lay down & adjust it. Don Jordan N6DJ 6A Arlington, Tx ***************************************** writes: > > I am trying to figure the best place to mount the altitude encoder > in my -6. > There are two small adjustment screws on the side of it and I am > guessing > that it may need some fine tuning when the transponder is being > checked. I > have come up with a way to mount it behind the instrument sub-panel > on a > hinged bracket so it will drop down for easy(?) access. > > Comments?? > > Jerry Calvert > Edmond Ok > -6 finish kit > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Van Artsdalen, Scott" <svanarts(at)unionsafe.com>
Subject: Last visit to Catto Props
Date: Jun 04, 2001
I returned this weekend to pick up my prop from Craig Catto. He did beautiful work! If you want to see what it looked like check out my web page on MSN: http://communities.msn.com/RVBuildersCentral/craigcatto.msnw?Page=1 <http://communities.msn.com/RVBuildersCentral/craigcatto.msnw?Page=1> I just can't impress upon everyone enough how nice a guy Craig is. He is genuinely warm and friendly. He was even very tolerant of my son running around chasing his cats, and climbing up his porch to try to catch the 20 or so hummingbirds that were hanging around the feeder. If you really want a nice looking prop from someone who is really easy to do business with, Catto Props is the place to go. -- Scott VanArtsdalen, MCSE, CCNA Network Administrator Union Safe Deposit Bank 209-946-5116 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BBSumrell(at)cs.com
Date: Jun 04, 2001
Subject: Re: RV8-List Digest: 1 Msgs - 06/03/01
Please unsubscribe bbsumrell@cs/.com Thank you ,BBS ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy" <skydog-8(at)home.com>
Subject: RV-8 canopy skirt
Date: Jun 04, 2001
Hey you guys, please don't misunderstand, I'm not whining here (because come hell or high water I'm going to get it done). But just out of curiosity, of all the "eight" builders out there how many of you found that the right side fit pretty good but the left side fit.............how shall I put this............less that elegantly? Randy Griffin N925RG (reserved) Vancouver, Wa. RV-8 Slooooooow build Canopy (duh) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Robertson" <mrobert569(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: AD Applicability
Date: Jun 04, 2001
If you look at FAR 39 you will read that an AD can be issued for anything, to include homebuilts, if needed. There are other FARs that say they do not apply and they don't with the exception of what is included within your Operating Limitations issued with the Special Airworthiness Csertificate. BUT, it is argued that anything with a Type Certificate Data Sheet and soem type of data plate is still subject to the ADs. At least that is the ruling out of DC these days. What has not been figured out yet by the Legal Beagles in DC yet is how to enforce them. About the only time they can be enforced is at the time of the initial certification. After that you are pretty much on your own unless you have an accident, at which time the FAA will confiscate your logbooks for examination. I know this will probably raise a roar but thats the way it is right now. At least that is the ruling I got from DC about two weeks ago. I wrote them back to ask how they plan on enforcing it but haven't heard back yet. My suggestion.......At the yearly condition inspection plan on having your local A&P, or whoever, do an AD search for you. I think that is going to be the way we will probably enforce AD for EXperiemtnals in the future. Mike Robertson Das Fed RV-8A >From: Ken Harrill <KHarrill(at)osa.state.sc.us> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: "'RV-list(at)matronics.com'" >Subject: RV-List: AD Applicability >Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 10:54:59 -0400 > > >"Das Fed" and others, > >Am I correct is assuming that AD's do not apply to Experimental aircraft? >An AI friend recently made reference to a spar AD on a Pitts homebuilt. >What gives? > > >Ken Harrill >RV - 6, electrical > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 04, 2001
From: phil <pcondon(at)mitre.org>
Subject: Mail Order Lycoming Parts Supplier( Gaskets,bolts small parts)
Can anyone recommend a "experimental friendly" parts house where we can mail order small lycoming parts ?? A local drive-in aero supplier went out of business and I am at a loss finding a reasonable mail order, cheep or reasonally priced source>...... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 04, 2001
From: Bill Ervin <n57wc(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Green Velcro
Rick Most of the time the OD Green velcro comes in 4X8 or 4X10 sheets you can have someone pick it up at any Base PX or BX Uniform shop. Active/retiree or Civil Air Patrol member can use the uniform shop. Bill Artesia NM RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Weiler" <doug.weiler(at)pressenter.com>
Subject: Ignition wiring
Date: Jun 04, 2001
Fellow Listers: All right, here's another dumb question which I can't quite seem to find. It's time to plan to hook up the ignition leads to my 0-360. It has Slick mags model 4373's and Slick harness. The question is which leads go to which cylinders. The OH manuals do depict this, but just want to double check to see if I'm visualizing this correctly. Thanks Doug ================ Doug Weiler Hudson, WI 715-386-1239 dougweil(at)pressenter.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DWENSING(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 05, 2001
Subject: Re: Returned mail: see transcript for details
In a message dated 6/5/01 1:10:53 AM Eastern Daylight Time, MAILER-DAEMON(at)matronics.com writes: << Warning! Let the builders beware! ;-) My wife is not really interested in airplanes but does enjoy our flying trips. However, I made a mistake when I started building the 6A. I took her along to Oshkosh for a couple of days and she saw the prices on all the "necessary" stuff I would need to purchase in addition to the actual kit. It cost me a big upgrade in her diamond ear studs! Dale Ensing 6A finishing >> ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 05, 2001
From: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Ignition wiring
Doug Weiler wrote: > > > Fellow Listers: > > All right, here's another dumb question which I can't quite seem to find. > It's time to plan to hook up the ignition leads to my 0-360. It has Slick > mags model 4373's and Slick harness. The question is which leads go to > which cylinders. The OH manuals do depict this, but just want to double > check to see if I'm visualizing this correctly. > > Thanks > > Doug > > ================ > Doug Weiler > Hudson, WI > 715-386-1239 > dougweil(at)pressenter.com > > Lot of the time the leads well have the cyclinder number marked on them. Look at the nuts that screws on to the spark plugs and if they is marked they well have a T1, (top number 1) B1, (for bottom number 1) and and T2 and B2 and so on. Jerry S ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 05, 2001
From: Ken Balch <kbalch1(at)mediaone.net>
Subject: Re: RV-8 canopy skirt
Hi Randy, Interesting. I had exactly the same trouble with the canopy skirt. The right side fit perfectly (I'm assuming that you're talking about the aft portion where it curves around the fuselage), but the left side took some finessing. It was bulging back there along about a ten inch section, which I finally got to sit down to within 3/32" of the skin. I called it good enough at that point and gladly moved on. I figured that I could put some material (stick-on foam?) back there to seal the small gap and I've certainly seen worse gaps on finished -8's at fly-ins, so I don't feel too badly about it. -- Regards, Ken Balch Ashland, MA RV-8 #81125 (N118KB) wing intersection fairings groups.yahoo.com/group/BostonRVBuilders/files/ Randy wrote: > > Hey you guys, please don't misunderstand, I'm not whining here (because > come hell or high water I'm going to get it done). > But just out of curiosity, of all the "eight" builders out there how > many of you found that the right side fit pretty good but the left side > fit.............how shall I put this............less that elegantly? > Randy Griffin > N925RG (reserved) > Vancouver, Wa. > RV-8 Slooooooow build > Canopy (duh) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jones, Bryan D." <bryan.jones@lyondell-citgo.com>
Subject: Mail Order Lycoming Parts Supplier( Gaskets,bolts sm
all parts)
Date: Jun 05, 2001
New parts Superior Air Parts, Inc. Dallas, TX USA (972) 233-4433 (800) 487-4884 Used parts EnParts 700 Ferris Rd Lancaster, Texas (972) 227-0086 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Clifford Begnaud" <shoeless(at)barefootpilot.com>
Subject: Re: Seattle area CFI
Date: Jun 05, 2001
kevin, Wow, are you going to have the first customer built -9 to fly? How soon? Cliff RV9A wings www.barefootpilot.com > > Are there any CFI's with an RV in the Seattle area? I need to get transition > training and checkride soon. Anyone have an address or number for Jerry > VanGrunsven? I found Mike Seager in the Yellar Pages > Kevin Shannon > 9A in WA > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ENewton57(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 05, 2001
Subject: Re: Mail Order Lycoming Parts Supplier( Gaskets,bolts small parts)
In a message dated 6/5/01 1:13:39 AM Central Daylight Time, pcondon(at)mitre.org writes: << Can anyone recommend a "experimental friendly" parts house where we can mail order small lycoming parts ?? A local drive-in aero supplier went out of business and I am at a loss finding a reasonable mail order, cheep or reasonally priced source>...... >> I use El Reno Aviation 1-800-521-0333. Ask for Ted. He has been wonderfull and has spent many hours on the phone with me explaining how things work. I belive he is fair and honest. He's even sent me a few small items at no charge (carb gasket, etc.) because I had bought a few other things from him. Eric Newton - Long Beach, Mississippi RV-6A N57ME (Reserved) (Engine Cowling) http://www.ericsrv6a.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ken Harrill <KHarrill(at)osa.state.sc.us>
Subject: AD Applicability
Date: Jun 05, 2001
Mike, Thanks for your response. I guess this means we should be careful to research AD's on our Lycomings, too, even if they are no longer certified engines. Ken Harrill RV-6, electrical -----Original Message----- From: Mike Robertson [mailto:mrobert569(at)hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 7:04 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: AD Applicability If you look at FAR 39 you will read that an AD can be issued for anything, to include homebuilts, if needed. There are other FARs that say they do not apply and they don't with the exception of what is included within your Operating Limitations issued with the Special Airworthiness Csertificate. BUT, it is argued that anything with a Type Certificate Data Sheet and soem type of data plate is still subject to the ADs. At least that is the ruling out of DC these days. What has not been figured out yet by the Legal Beagles in DC yet is how to enforce them. About the only time they can be enforced is at the time of the initial certification. After that you are pretty much on your own unless you have an accident, at which time the FAA will confiscate your logbooks for examination. I know this will probably raise a roar but thats the way it is right now. At least that is the ruling I got from DC about two weeks ago. I wrote them back to ask how they plan on enforcing it but haven't heard back yet. My suggestion.......At the yearly condition inspection plan on having your local A&P, or whoever, do an AD search for you. I think that is going to be the way we will probably enforce AD for EXperiemtnals in the future. Mike Robertson Das Fed RV-8A >From: Ken Harrill <KHarrill(at)osa.state.sc.us> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: "'RV-list(at)matronics.com'" >Subject: RV-List: AD Applicability >Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 10:54:59 -0400 > > >"Das Fed" and others, > >Am I correct is assuming that AD's do not apply to Experimental aircraft? >An AI friend recently made reference to a spar AD on a Pitts homebuilt. >What gives? > > >Ken Harrill >RV - 6, electrical > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: Ignition wiring
Date: Jun 05, 2001
The Slick lead plug nuts for my slick mag harness are stamped with a number like T-3 or B-2. Have you checked those? Cy Galley - Bellanca Champion Club Newsletter Editor & EAA TC www.bellanca-championclub.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Weiler" <doug.weiler(at)pressenter.com> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 4:51 PM Subject: RV-List: Ignition wiring Fellow Listers: All right, here's another dumb question which I can't quite seem to find. It's time to plan to hook up the ignition leads to my 0-360. It has Slick mags model 4373's and Slick harness. The question is which leads go to which cylinders. The OH manuals do depict this, but just want to double check to see if I'm visualizing this correctly. Thanks Doug ================ Doug Weiler Hudson, WI 715-386-1239 dougweil(at)pressenter.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Wiegenstein" <johnw(at)hellerwiegenstein.com>
Subject: MD-42BS Rivet Substitution
Date: Jun 05, 2001
In assembling the F-690 pushrod ends I find myself short of the specified MD-42 BS pop rivets. Hate to order just those from Van's or Spruce ($1 for parts, $20 for shipping . . ), and haven't been able to find a useful cross-reference chart to show what alternatives are acceptable. Has anyone come up with same, or any other source that would tell me what these rivets are made of/designed for, and which other pop rivets would be acceptable in this application? Thanks in advance! John and Laurie Wiegenstein Hansville, WA RV-6 23961 - almost ready to order finish kit . . .AND FINISHED WITH PRIMING (woo hoo!!) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Pardue" <n5lp(at)carlsbad.net>
Subject: Re: AD Applicability
Date: Jun 05, 2001
> > AD applicability is addressed in AC 39-7C. A "general" AD: "Unless > specifically stated, AD's apply to the make and model set forth in the > applicability statement REGARDLESS OF THE CLASSIFICATION OR CATEGORY OF > THE AIRWORTHINESS CERTIFICATE ISSUED FOR THE AIRCRAFT." (ie, this > includes experimental aircraft) > Of course for homebuilt aircraft each individual airplane is a different make. The make of my airplane is "Pardue." So it would seem the each individual airplane would have to be named in the AD for it to apply legally to our airplanes. Some AD's do apply to individual aircraft. There was a fuel problem in California a few years ago where the AD listed aircraft by N number. Larry Pardue Carlsbad, NM RV-6 N441LP Flying http://www.carlsbadnm.com/n5lp/index.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "fred boss" <newrver(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Primer Decision
Date: Jun 05, 2001
A few weeks ago I posted a question of priming the interior of the RV emp and wings. I used Coleman fuel and Zinc Chromate but then had problems of the zinc flaking off. After many suggestions I've decided to use Alumiprep (scuff with scotchbrite pad), Alodine, and AKZO epoxy primer. Has any one used AKZO in the cockpit? How does it hold up? When using Alodine on the inside of the control surface skins do you take the plastic coating off the outside of the skin? Should you prime the outside of the skin as well if you Alodine it. What I'd like to do is only Alodine the inside and leave the outside plastic on. Has anyone been successful with this? Thankx Fred ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Hurlbut" <shurlbut(at)island.net>
Subject: Re: Tyler Feldman Photo's
Date: Jun 05, 2001
I have a couple personal photos I could scan and send to you. Steve Hurlbut Comox, BC shurlbut(at)island.net ----- Original Message ----- From: Ross Mickey <rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 10:36 AM Subject: RV-List: Tyler Feldman Photo's > > Does anyone have pictures on the net of Tyler Feldman's Award Winning RV-6? > My searching has turned up nothing and the archives seem to be down. > > Ross > RV-6A > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: RV-8 canopy skirt
Date: Jun 05, 2001
>Hey you guys, please don't misunderstand, I'm not whining here (because >come hell or high water I'm going to get it done). >But just out of curiosity, of all the "eight" builders out there how >many of you found that the right side fit pretty good but the left side >fit.............how shall I put this............less that elegantly? >Randy Griffin >N925RG (reserved) >Vancouver, Wa. >RV-8 Slooooooow build >Canopy (duh) Yo Randy, My experience exactly! Right side fit beautifully (after cutting the skirt at the rear centerline). Left side was yucky. Still doesn't quite look right when the light hits it from a certain angle, but it seals reasonably well. I had to cut the skirt about 18 inches forward of the rear cut on the left side to get it to conform to the turtledeck. I hope to meet up with you, Lervold and the other RV wackos up in your part of the woods this coming July. Brian Denk RV8 N94BD 209 hrs on "ole Sharkey" ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6bldr(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Primer Decision
Date: Jun 05, 2001
Fred, I used AKZO and like it even though it is very labor intensive. Use it on any aluminum interior surface. It is very, very tough. Don't prime exterior surfaces at this time. Do that when the aircraft is painted. Some of the alodine will stain the exterior suface of the part, but don't worry about it. Leave the plastic on the outside skins if you prefer. Just be sure to rinse out the alumprep and alodine that gets under the edges of the plastic. Take a spray bottle and spray on alumiprep and alodine on skins. Parts that aren't plastic coated, such as ribs, angles, etc., can be totally submersed in the solutions. Jerry Calvert Edmond Ok -6 finish ----- Original Message ----- From: fred boss <newrver(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 9:02 AM Subject: RV-List: Primer Decision > > A few weeks ago I posted a question of priming the interior of the RV emp > and wings. I used Coleman fuel and Zinc Chromate but then had problems of > the zinc flaking off. > After many suggestions I've decided to use Alumiprep (scuff with scotchbrite > pad), Alodine, and AKZO epoxy primer. > > Has any one used AKZO in the cockpit? How does it hold up? > > When using Alodine on the inside of the control surface skins do you take > the plastic coating off the outside of the skin? > > Should you prime the outside of the skin as well if you Alodine it. What I'd > like to do is only Alodine the inside and leave the outside plastic on. Has > anyone been successful with this? > > Thankx > Fred > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Charles Rowbotham" <crowbotham(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: RV-8 canopy skirt
Date: Jun 05, 2001
Randy, Had the same situation. Question: Do you have the new two peice skirt. If not I'd recommend cutting it at the very rear. This makes the alinement easier. We also used proseal (semi weld) to attach the canopy & skirt to the frame withonly a few keeper rivits (pop). Worked & looks great. Chuck & Dave Rowbotham RV-8A (Wings painted and permenantly bolted) Niantic, CT (Westerly airport) > >Hey you guys, please don't misunderstand, I'm not whining here (because >come hell or high water I'm going to get it done). >But just out of curiosity, of all the "eight" builders out there how >many of you found that the right side fit pretty good but the left side >fit.............how shall I put this............less that elegantly? >Randy Griffin >N925RG (reserved) >Vancouver, Wa. >RV-8 Slooooooow build >Canopy (duh) > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: MD-42BS Rivet Substitution
Date: Jun 05, 2001
Thread-Topic: RV-List: MD-42BS Rivet Substitution Thread-Index: AcDtxGqs2KrADPmjSL+zU6Tk9stYJwACOZMw
From: "Bob Japundza" <Bob.Japundza(at)realmed.com>
Hi John, These are monel pop rivets and the Cherry 'N' rivets are a good substitute. Available from Wicks. Bob Japundza RV-6 N244BJ O-360C/S flying -----Original Message----- From: John Wiegenstein [mailto:johnw(at)hellerwiegenstein.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 8:04 AM Subject: RV-List: MD-42BS Rivet Substitution In assembling the F-690 pushrod ends I find myself short of the specified MD-42 BS pop rivets. Hate to order just those from Van's or Spruce ($1 for parts, $20 for shipping . . ), and haven't been able to find a useful cross-reference chart to show what alternatives are acceptable. Has anyone come up with same, or any other source that would tell me what these rivets are made of/designed for, and which other pop rivets would be acceptable in this application? Thanks in advance! John and Laurie Wiegenstein Hansville, WA RV-6 23961 - almost ready to order finish kit . . .AND FINISHED WITH PRIMING (woo hoo!!) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Im7shannon(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 05, 2001
Subject: Re: Last visit to Catto Props
I too highly reccomend Catto, but he is so busy now, he will probably be upset with us for generating so much more new work for him! Just be aware he is a one man shop and get your order in early. Mail your spinner to him and he will fit it up for you too, Kevin in Wa -9A finishing > I just can't impress upon everyone enough how nice a guy Craig is. He is > genuinely warm and friendly. He was even very tolerant of my son running > around chasing his cats, and climbing up his porch to try to catch the 20 or > so hummingbirds that were hanging around the feeder. If you really want a > nice looking prop from someone who is really easy to do business with, Catto > Props is the place to go. > > -- > Scott VanArtsdalen, ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Searching for...
Date: Jun 05, 2001
Hey folks, I'm looking for info on the owner of a Red, White and Blue RV6 that was parked at the Cougar Landing Fly-in this past weekend with N213JM on the tail. This aircraft had roll bar handles and something that looks like a compartment or access panel forward of the canopy on the passenger side. I've already tried the N-Number searches but all of the sites come back as 404's. Any info would be appreciated. Ralph Capen ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Robertson" <mrobert569(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: AD Applicability
Date: Jun 05, 2001
If the data polate is removed then the engine is experimental. If the data plate is still on then it is not experimental regardless if it is installed in an experimental aircraft. That being said even if the data plate is removed, for your own safety, I would still strongly recommend you research the ADs each year. Mike Robertson Das Fed RV-8A >From: Ken Harrill <KHarrill(at)osa.state.sc.us> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: "'rv-list(at)matronics.com'" >Subject: RE: RV-List: AD Applicability >Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:01:48 -0400 > > >Mike, > >Thanks for your response. I guess this means we should be careful to >research AD's on our Lycomings, too, even if they are no longer certified >engines. > >Ken Harrill >RV-6, electrical > > -----Original Message----- >From: Mike Robertson [mailto:mrobert569(at)hotmail.com] >Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 7:04 PM >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV-List: AD Applicability > > >If you look at FAR 39 you will read that an AD can be issued for anything, >to include homebuilts, if needed. There are other FARs that say they do >not > >apply and they don't with the exception of what is included within your >Operating Limitations issued with the Special Airworthiness Csertificate. >BUT, it is argued that anything with a Type Certificate Data Sheet and soem >type of data plate is still subject to the ADs. At least that is the >ruling > >out of DC these days. > >What has not been figured out yet by the Legal Beagles in DC yet is how to >enforce them. About the only time they can be enforced is at the time of >the initial certification. After that you are pretty much on your own >unless you have an accident, at which time the FAA will confiscate your >logbooks for examination. > >I know this will probably raise a roar but thats the way it is right now. >At least that is the ruling I got from DC about two weeks ago. I wrote >them > >back to ask how they plan on enforcing it but haven't heard back yet. > >My suggestion.......At the yearly condition inspection plan on having your >local A&P, or whoever, do an AD search for you. I think that is going to >be > >the way we will probably enforce AD for EXperiemtnals in the future. > >Mike Robertson >Das Fed >RV-8A > > > >From: Ken Harrill <KHarrill(at)osa.state.sc.us> > >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > >To: "'RV-list(at)matronics.com'" > >Subject: RV-List: AD Applicability > >Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 10:54:59 -0400 > > > > > >"Das Fed" and others, > > > >Am I correct is assuming that AD's do not apply to Experimental aircraft? > >An AI friend recently made reference to a spar AD on a Pitts homebuilt. > >What gives? > > > > > >Ken Harrill > >RV - 6, electrical > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Besing, Paul" <Paul.Besing(at)avnet.com>
Subject: Tyler Feldman Photo's
Date: Jun 05, 2001
http://www.lacodeworks.com/besing Click on Copperstate '99 photos. Paul Besing RV-6A 197AB Arizona About to taxi test -----Original Message----- From: Ross Mickey [mailto:rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 10:37 AM Subject: RV-List: Tyler Feldman Photo's Does anyone have pictures on the net of Tyler Feldman's Award Winning RV-6? My searching has turned up nothing and the archives seem to be down. Ross RV-6A ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 05, 2001
From: Finn Lassen <finnlassen(at)netzero.net>
Subject: Re: Primer Decision
Whatever you do, do not leave the plastic on the skins out in the sun for any extended period of time (weeks, months). I did and it looks like it'll be hell to get if off when ready for priming/painting. Finn fred boss wrote: > > A few weeks ago I posted a question of priming the interior of the RV emp > and wings. I used Coleman fuel and Zinc Chromate but then had problems of > the zinc flaking off. > After many suggestions I've decided to use Alumiprep (scuff with scotchbrite > pad), Alodine, and AKZO epoxy primer. > > Has any one used AKZO in the cockpit? How does it hold up? > > When using Alodine on the inside of the control surface skins do you take > the plastic coating off the outside of the skin? > > Should you prime the outside of the skin as well if you Alodine it. What I'd > like to do is only Alodine the inside and leave the outside plastic on. Has > anyone been successful with this? > > Thankx > Fred > NetZero Platinum No Banner Ads and Unlimited Access Sign Up Today - Only $9.95 per month! http://www.netzero.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Craig Hagen" <chagen(at)hagenrealestate.com>
Subject: Re: Searching for...
Date: Jun 05, 2001
Ralph, Check landings.com. I found your request to be: James Edward McNeill 124 Bondair RD E Greers Ferry, AR 72067-9352 Craig Hagen N7180L Grumman Traveller RV-6A wings ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 10:10 AM Subject: RV-List: Searching for... > > Hey folks, > > I'm looking for info on the owner of a Red, White and Blue RV6 that was > parked at the Cougar Landing Fly-in this past weekend with N213JM on the > tail. > > This aircraft had roll bar handles and something that looks like a > compartment or access panel forward of the canopy on the passenger side. > > I've already tried the N-Number searches but all of the sites come back > as 404's. > > Any info would be appreciated. > > Ralph Capen > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 05, 2001
From: Scot Stambaugh <sstambaugh(at)qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: Returned mail: see transcript for details
Solution -- Remove old diamond studs from current wife and install in new, lower maintenance wife;~) Just a suggestion. Good luck. scot > >In a message dated 6/5/01 1:10:53 AM Eastern Daylight Time, >MAILER-DAEMON(at)matronics.com writes: > ><< Warning! Let the builders beware! ;-) > > My wife is not really interested in airplanes but does enjoy our flying > trips. However, I made a mistake when I started building the 6A. I took her > along to Oshkosh for a couple of days and she saw the prices on all the > "necessary" stuff I would need to purchase in addition to the actual > kit. It > cost me a big upgrade in her diamond ear studs! > Dale Ensing > 6A finishing > >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 05, 2001
From: Phil N <pnewlon(at)toosan.com>
Subject: Re: Searching for...
Ralph - (this is all one line, you will have to fix it as the mailer will break it up) http://162.58.35.241/acdatabase/NNumSQL.asp?NNumbertxt=213JM&cmndfind.x=17&cmndfind.y=11 Registered Owner Name MCNEILL JAMES EDWARD Street 124 BONDAIR RD E City GREERS FERRY State ARKANSAS Zip Code 72067-9352 County CLEBURNE Country UNITED STATES Phil (RV8 wannabe, lurker) > I'm looking for info on the owner of a Red, White and Blue RV6 that was > parked at the Cougar Landing Fly-in this past weekend with N213JM on the > tail. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RVPilot4(at)webtv.net (BOBE.)
Date: Jun 05, 2001
Subject: Re: Last visit to Catto Props
I have had more experience in wood props than the average pilot and Catto is not the last word in wood props.When Bernie Warnke was alive according to tests in aviation journals,he was the one to beat.You will be hard pressed to beat Performance Propellors by Clark Lydick.To tell all these new builders that Catto is "THE" place to buy a prop is misleading. Bob Murphy Poplar Grove ILL. (C77) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Searching for...
Date: Jun 05, 2001
Thanks to all who responded - seems my DNS server was not resolving the name to IP address. All fine now...all I need to do is get the phone number to answer... Ralph Capen ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RWood90641(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 05, 2001
Subject: Fuselage Jig
I am looking for a cutting plan that used 2 sheets of 4x8 plywood for the jig and in so doing would eliminate the warping of framing lumber. The idea is to glue and screw the ripped plywood into nominal 2x6,s and 2x4,s . Finishing wing. rwood(at)90641.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Norman, MD" <jnorman(at)InterMapSystems.com>
Subject: Purge Valve for Air Flow Performance FI System
Date: Jun 05, 2001
For those of you out there with an Air Flow Performance fuel injection system, how are you hooking up your purge valve system? More specifically, are you tapping into your tank vent line for the purge return (which is what I intend to do), and secondly, what type of control did you mount in the cocpit to turn on/off the purge system? thanks, Jim Tampa 6A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HCRV6(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 05, 2001
Subject: Re: MD-42BS Rivet Substitution
In a message dated 6/5/01 6:09:01 AM Pacific Daylight Time, johnw(at)hellerwiegenstein.com writes: << short of the specified MD-42 BS pop rivets. >> MSP-42's replace the MD-42 BS. Harry Crosby Pleasanton, California RV-6, finish kit stuff ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 05, 2001
From: Charlie and Tupper England <cengland(at)netdoor.com>
Subject: Re: Mail Order Lycoming Parts Supplier( Gaskets,bolts small
parts) phil wrote: > > > Can anyone recommend a "experimental friendly" parts house where we can > mail order small lycoming parts ?? A local drive-in aero supplier went > out of business and I am at a loss finding a reasonable mail order, > cheep or reasonally priced source>...... > Try Linda Lou, Inc PO Box 18255 Memphis TN 38181 800-824-9912 901-365-9524 If she isn't in the Yeller Pages, she should be. I've ordered from her for almost 10 years, & have no complaints. Charlie RV-4(sold) RV2+2(bought) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Nellis" <mnellis(at)peoplepc.com>
Subject: Re: Fuselage Jig
Date: Jun 05, 2001
Is this Rod Woodward? If it is, I thought you drew up some plans for a plywood jig back in 1997? I've got the plans around here somewhere and I can scan them if necessary. In the meantime, the results of those jig plans can be seen here. I apologize for the poor quality, but this was prior to my digital camera in my early days of building. http://bmnellis.com/Horiz_Stabilizer.htm Mike Nellis - http://bmnellis.com Plainfield, IL RV6 N699BM (res) Building Flaps Stinson 108-2 N9666K > > I am looking for a cutting plan that used 2 sheets of 4x8 plywood for the > jig and in so doing would eliminate the warping of framing lumber. The idea > is to glue and screw the ripped plywood into nominal 2x6,s and 2x4,s . > Finishing wing. rwood(at)90641.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Last visit to Catto Props
From: Eric.J.Henson(at)chase.com
Date: Jun 05, 2001
06/05/2001 03:14:13 PM Since Sun N Fun I've been fighting with the bearacracy at Spruce over a $90 fuel pressure gauge. Absolutely no service after they have your money, I shoulda taken Scotts advice and went with Wicks. Scott posted his battle with Spruce a few months ago. Now he is posting information about someone that treats his customers like they matter. I apreciate him taking the time to do so. BTW, if you were to do a poll on performance from RV's flying wood props I'll bet Aymar-Demouth would win hands down. As a matter of fact this poll happened a few years back on the list and there were lots of instances where builders had to send their props back to Bernie to get re-pitched. I mean no disrespect to Bernie, he was a key player in the homebuilt movement. It just seems that Aymar has an edge on the others, speed wise. I have been watching performance specs for props very carefully over the last six years, thats why I ordered my Aymar-Demouth today. $995.00; 3 month lead time. Eric Henson RVPilot4(at)webtv.net (BOBE.)(at)matronics.com on 06/05/2001 02:07:48 PM Please respond to rv-list(at)matronics.com Sent by: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com cc: Subject: Re: RV-List: Last visit to Catto Props I have had more experience in wood props than the average pilot and Catto is not the last word in wood props.When Bernie Warnke was alive according to tests in aviation journals,he was the one to beat.You will be hard pressed to beat Performance Propellors by Clark Lydick.To tell all these new builders that Catto is "THE" place to buy a prop is misleading. Bob Murphy Poplar Grove ILL. (C77) ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Purge Valve for Air Flow Performance FI System
From: pichon.dean(at)ADLittle.com
Date: Jun 05, 2001
17, 2001) at 06/05/2001 03:23:22 PM I have installed the Air Flow Performance fuel injection system (including purge valve) in my -4, but have not yet run the engine. If all goes well, this weekend I will start it up. I plumbed the return line into the right tank via a T into the fuel line that runs from the tank to the fuel selector valve. I believe this will require that the left tank be selected whenever I use the purge system. "Cool" fuel will be drawn from the left tank and discharged into the right. To actuate the valve, I installed a simple push-pull (mixture) cable mechanism purchased from AS&S. Good luck. Dean Pichon RV-4 Time to pressurize the fuel system Arlington, MA |--------+----------------------------------> | | "Jim Norman, MD" | | | | | | Sent by: | | | owner-rv-list-server@mat| | | ronics.com | | | | | | | | | 06/05/01 02:27 PM | | | Please respond to | | | rv-list | | | | |--------+----------------------------------> | | | To: | | cc: | | bcc: | | Subject: RV-List: Purge Valve for Air Flow Performance FI System | For those of you out there with an Air Flow Performance fuel injection system, how are you hooking up your purge valve system? More specifically, are you tapping into your tank vent line for the purge return (which is what I intend to do), and secondly, what type of control did you mount in the cocpit to turn on/off the purge system? thanks, Jim Tampa 6A **** This message is from Arthur D. Little, Inc., and/or one of Arthur D. Little's subsidiaries or affiliates and may contain confidential business information. It is intended for the addressee only and may not be copied without our permission. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender as soon as possible.**** ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: AD Applicability
Date: Jun 05, 2001
Mike, Your interpretation is just one of many in this area. Each FAA person that reads it does it different. Some would say that since it isn't being maintained by a "certified" mechanic, it becomes an experimental engine. Some FSDOs require the data plate to be removed, others don't. BTW, the regs say you have to have a Metal data plate. Safetywise, your interpretation is as good as any. It is unfortunate that there are as many interpretations as there are employees of the FAA and it varies across the country. Even the FAA legal department has a different slant than field personnel. As I understand it, ADs do not have any legal standing for an experimental BUT at the same time one has to maintain the experimental in airworthy condition which means that ADs that effect airworthiness must be attended so as to make the plane airworthy. How is that for CYA! Cy Galley Editor, EAA Safety Programs cgalley(at)qcbc.org or experimenter(at)eaa.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Robertson" <mrobert569(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 10:10 AM Subject: RE: RV-List: AD Applicability If the data polate is removed then the engine is experimental. If the data plate is still on then it is not experimental regardless if it is installed in an experimental aircraft. That being said even if the data plate is removed, for your own safety, I would still strongly recommend you research the ADs each year. Mike Robertson Das Fed RV-8A >From: Ken Harrill <KHarrill(at)osa.state.sc.us> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: "'rv-list(at)matronics.com'" >Subject: RE: RV-List: AD Applicability >Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:01:48 -0400 > > >Mike, > >Thanks for your response. I guess this means we should be careful to >research AD's on our Lycomings, too, even if they are no longer certified >engines. > >Ken Harrill >RV-6, electrical > > -----Original Message----- >From: Mike Robertson [mailto:mrobert569(at)hotmail.com] >Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 7:04 PM >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV-List: AD Applicability > > >If you look at FAR 39 you will read that an AD can be issued for anything, >to include homebuilts, if needed. There are other FARs that say they do >not > >apply and they don't with the exception of what is included within your >Operating Limitations issued with the Special Airworthiness Csertificate. >BUT, it is argued that anything with a Type Certificate Data Sheet and soem >type of data plate is still subject to the ADs. At least that is the >ruling > >out of DC these days. > >What has not been figured out yet by the Legal Beagles in DC yet is how to >enforce them. About the only time they can be enforced is at the time of >the initial certification. After that you are pretty much on your own >unless you have an accident, at which time the FAA will confiscate your >logbooks for examination. > >I know this will probably raise a roar but thats the way it is right now. >At least that is the ruling I got from DC about two weeks ago. I wrote >them > >back to ask how they plan on enforcing it but haven't heard back yet. > >My suggestion.......At the yearly condition inspection plan on having your >local A&P, or whoever, do an AD search for you. I think that is going to >be > >the way we will probably enforce AD for EXperiemtnals in the future. > >Mike Robertson >Das Fed >RV-8A > > > >From: Ken Harrill <KHarrill(at)osa.state.sc.us> > >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > >To: "'RV-list(at)matronics.com'" > >Subject: RV-List: AD Applicability > >Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 10:54:59 -0400 > > > > > >"Das Fed" and others, > > > >Am I correct is assuming that AD's do not apply to Experimental aircraft? > >An AI friend recently made reference to a spar AD on a Pitts homebuilt. > >What gives? > > > > > >Ken Harrill > >RV - 6, electrical > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Blomgren" <jackanet(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: winglets
Date: Jun 05, 2001
Builders, any RV winglet activity out there? More specifically, has anyone either pondered or engaged in modification experiments, molding winglets onto Van's tips? Nothing in archive. Jack Blomgren Minnesota Wing 8 wings, tanks ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DWENSING(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 05, 2001
Subject: Re: RVs and diamond studs - advice to the new builders.
In a message dated 6/5/01 3:10:08 PM Eastern Daylight Time, jjewell(at)okanagan.net writes: << I suggest that you go on with the idea of keeping the current wife >> I agree! She is actually very supportive of the RV project. However....., Rule #1. To maintain that support, do not let project/airplane appear to be the most important thing in ones life. Even if it is a very close second. We do become obsessed. Besides, after the kit is built the strain on the checking account really sets in. i.e.engine, prop, prop governor, instruments, wiring, painting etc. I need her on my side! Dale Ensing 6A still finishing and building hangar to put it. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RICKRV6(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 05, 2001
Subject: Re: RV-8 canopy skirt
In a message dated 6/5/01 2:00:09 AM Eastern Daylight Time, skydog-8(at)home.com writes: << Hey you guys, please don't misunderstand, I'm not whining here (because come hell or high water I'm going to get it done). But just out of curiosity, of all the "eight" builders out there how many of you found that the right side fit pretty good but the left side fit.............how shall I put this............less that elegantly? Randy Griffin >> Personally, I think you're lucky one of the two sides fit. I've spent a ton of hours getting a good tight fit, especially along the back, and I'm still not done. I've put it aside to work on other tasks lest I get fiberglass burn-out. Rick McBride ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Van Artsdalen, Scott" <svanarts(at)unionsafe.com>
Subject: Last visit to Catto Props
Date: Jun 05, 2001
Who said he was the last word in wood props? Not I! I did urge people to do business with him and I still do. Warnke wouldn't return my phone calls. Craig did and was very patient in helping me decide what prop I should order. Now that you bring it up, "Hey new builders! Catto IS THE place to buy your prop! Catto is your one stop shop for propeller carving and spinner fitting. Look no farther for the absolute best in customer service and support!" PS. I've really got nothing against Warnke. I know they make a fine product. But if they don't return my calls, they don't get my business. I don't care if they're busy or not. PPS. Craig Catto had a Warnke prop in his shop that had been sent to him for rework. Again, not an editorial, just an interesting fact. Flames welcome. -- Scott (misleading the newbies) VanArtsdalen, MCSE, CCNA Network Administrator Union Safe Deposit Bank 209-946-5116 -----Original Message----- From: RVPilot4(at)webtv.net [mailto:RVPilot4(at)webtv.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 11:08 AM To: rv-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Re: RV-List: Last visit to Catto Props I have had more experience in wood props than the average pilot and Catto is not the last word in wood props.When Bernie Warnke was alive according to tests in aviation journals,he was the one to beat.You will be hard pressed to beat Performance Propellors by Clark Lydick.To tell all these new builders that Catto is "THE" place to buy a prop is misleading. Bob Murphy Poplar Grove ILL. (C77) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Greg Tanner" <gtanner(at)bendcable.com>
Subject: Last visit to Catto Props
Date: Jun 05, 2001
Scott, I have my prop ordered with Craig. I do have trouble getting my calls returned however. I've been waiting 5 days since I last left him a message. Kevin says he's real busy so takes awhile to get to his messages. I'm trying to be patient as I'm not even close to ready for my prop but I would still like to hear from him. Greg Tanner RV-9A WINGS O-320 D1A/CATTO N80BR RESERVED -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Van Artsdalen, Scott Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 2:07 PM Subject: RE: RV-List: Last visit to Catto Props Who said he was the last word in wood props? Not I! I did urge people to do business with him and I still do. Warnke wouldn't return my phone calls. Craig did and was very patient in helping me decide what prop I should order.


May 30, 2001 - June 05, 2001

RV-Archive.digest.vol-kv