RV-Archive.digest.vol-lv

November 06, 2001 - November 13, 2001



      
      Do you mean to say that the phillips heads are so crappy that they're
      stripping from the force required to move them 1/4 turn?  Wow!
      
      Ken
      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stucklen, Frederic IFC" <stuckle(at)ifc.utc.com>
Subject: ifr in an rv6a
Date: Nov 06, 2001
I have hundreds of IFR hours in my -6A and never saw any yaw problems any worst that the piper series. In all cases, I'd say it was less than the turbulence induced yaw in the Piper 140. I must add that flying an RV in solid IFR is not a easy as flying a C-182 or Bananza. The RV is pitch and roll sensitive in turbulence and requires continuous concentration on the instruments. If you are alone and need to take an amended clearance AND look that clearance up on the charts AND fly the airplane, you could very quickly get behind the airplane. It can be done, but it takes a skill level that is usually beyond most infrequent flyers. These types of conditions are when a wing leveler really makes a difference........ Fred Stucklen N925RV (1855 hrs/8 Yrs) E. Windsor, CT 06088 WK Email: stuckle(at)ifc.utc.com Hm/Travel Email: wstucklen1(at)juno.com ___ From: ABAYMAN(at)aol.com Subject: Re: RV-List: ifr in an rv6a for those of you listers who have flown an rv6 or 6a into real ifr weather, what were your findings. we flew a warrior in a level 4 thunderstorm saturday night, my instructor and i, and it was a very rough ride. lots of tail wagging, up and down drafts. i know the rv 6 has a tail wagging tendency. is it controllable. with the sensitive handling of the rv, it seems that with all the turbulance, it would be difficult to control. it seems that you would be over controling in all aspects of the flight. i'm sure once i build up some cloud time i probably want even be asking these questions, but for a newbie into the soup and turb. makes me wonder. i was able to handle the warrior without my instructor's input, but worried about something so sensitive. scott tampa rv6a painting getting instrument ticket in real ifr weather ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Van Artsdalen, Scott" <svanarts(at)unionsafe.com>
Subject: RE: Filtered Air Box Thanks! & Vetterman Exhaust...
Date: Nov 06, 2001
Good choice on the exhaust, Bill. I've had several builders (of various makes) come by and look at my exhaust and ask who made it? One guy was a welder by trade and spent several minutes inspecting the welds on the exhaust. He admitted that he couldn't do that good. Whether it Larry Vetterman, Bart LeBlonde, or Craig Catto, there are a lot of good guys lurking on this list! I try my hardest to do business with list members. -- Scott VanArtsdalen, MCSE, CCNA Network Administrator Union Safe Deposit Bank 209-946-5116 -----Original Message----- From: Bill VonDane [mailto:n8vd(at)earthlink.net] Subject: RV-List: RE: Filtered Air Box Thanks! & Vetterman Exhaust... Just wanted to say thanks for all the input I got on my filtered air box... I use the TAR method, and got it all finished up... On another note... I got my Vetterman exhaust today and it is simply a work of art... I am sure it will be the best looking thing on my RV, and nobody will be able to see it! Dammit! Also, I can't say enough about Larry Vetterman... The first words out of my mouth when I called him were "Larry, I'm totally broke, but need an exhaust system." and after he stopped laughing hysterically, he convinced me that his exhaust was the way to go. I didn't need much convincing, but after talking with him, I had no doubt that buying from him was the right thing to do... He asked me if I needed gaskets, I said no. He asked me if I needed the mounting/hanging kit for $40, I said I couldn't afford it. He said, that's ok, it wouldn't be that hard to make my own... Guess what, there was a mounting kit in my box when it came today. No charge... Need I say more? -Bill VonDane Colorado Springs, CO RV-8A - N8VD - Finish http://vondane.com/rv8a/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Don Hyde <DonH(at)axonn.com>
Subject: Thought on stiff, quiet floor
Date: Nov 06, 2001
I have an idea of filling the spaces between the angles on the floor with 3/4" thick end-grain balsa blocks, stuck down with a thin layer of epoxy, and then a sheet of aluminum, maybe no more than .016 epoxied on top of that. Sounds rigid, insulated, and not terribly expensive. A quick web search turned up: http://www.fiberlay.com/Pages/coresend.html with a 2X4 foot sheet of suitable balsa blocks for $25.33, which sounds like pretty close to enough for an RV-6A. Does the idea have any merit, do you think? Don Hyde dhyde(at)axonn.com Senior Software Engineer Axonn Corporation http://www.axonn.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ollie Washburn" <skybolt-aviator(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: ifr in an rv6a
Date: Nov 06, 2001
Scott I doubt you were in a level 4 as the plane would PROBABLY be almost uncontrolable and a level 5 has a good chance of aircraft breaking up.Stay away from thunderbumpers. Ollie&Lorene Washburn RV6-A,N795LW,@97FL. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 06, 2001
From: Nels Hanson <pa201950(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Thought on stiff, quiet floor
It may trap moisture under there. I did it by screwing thru the floor into the wood. --- Don Hyde wrote: > > > I have an idea of filling the spaces between the > angles on the floor with > 3/4" thick end-grain balsa blocks, stuck down with a > thin layer of epoxy, > and then a sheet of aluminum, maybe no more than > .016 epoxied on top of > that. > > Sounds rigid, insulated, and not terribly expensive. > A quick web search > turned up: > > http://www.fiberlay.com/Pages/coresend.html > > with a 2X4 foot sheet of suitable balsa blocks for > $25.33, which sounds like > pretty close to enough for an RV-6A. > > Does the idea have any merit, do you think? > > Don Hyde dhyde(at)axonn.com > Senior Software Engineer > Axonn Corporation http://www.axonn.com > > > > Month! > Thank you for your > [##---------------------------5.5%-----------------------------] > > > Contributions of > any other form > > latest messages. > other List members. > > http://www.matronics.com/subscription > http://www.matronics.com/photoshare > http://www.matronics.com/search > http://www.matronics.com/archives > http://www.matronics.com/emaillists > > > > > Find a job, post your resume. http://careers.yahoo.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: Re: More camloc stuff
Date: Nov 06, 2001
> > Any comments on the quality of their kits, post-sales customer support, > > etc. would be welcome. Also, is the 4" spacing they recommend > > sufficient to prevent puckering of the fiberglass between camlocs? > > It has been my experiance that the phillips camlocs suck....they strip out > way to easy. Use the flush style slot type they work much better. I think my spacing is around 3.5" and I get just the tiniest bit of puckering visible only when in flight. I haven't had any problem with the philips whatsoever and went that way because I there are philips screws all over the plane, plus my oil door has two philips camlocs (I changed the 2600 series studs from the "wings" that Van's provides to flush philips... much better looking and easier to wipe down the cowl). Randy Lervold www.rv-8.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 06, 2001
From: Jaye and Scott Jackson <jayeandscott(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: Thought on stiff, quiet floor
My only concern would be the chance of holding moisture up against a structural, stressed skin for indefinite periods of time... Scott in Vancouver -6 finishing ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Hyde" <DonH(at)axonn.com> Subject: RV-List: Thought on stiff, quiet floor > > I have an idea of filling the spaces between the angles on the floor with > 3/4" thick end-grain balsa blocks, stuck down with a thin layer of epoxy, > and then a sheet of aluminum, maybe no more than .016 epoxied on top of > that. > > Sounds rigid, insulated, and not terribly expensive. A quick web search > turned up: > > http://www.fiberlay.com/Pages/coresend.html > > with a 2X4 foot sheet of suitable balsa blocks for $25.33, which sounds like > pretty close to enough for an RV-6A. > > Does the idea have any merit, do you think? > > Don Hyde dhyde(at)axonn.com > Senior Software Engineer > Axonn Corporation http://www.axonn.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Donald Mei" <don_mei(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Seeking advice for long X - country Seattle to Connecticut
Date: Nov 06, 2001
Gentlemen, In the next week or so, I will be flying an RV-9 from Seattle to Bridgeport, CT. As this will be my first time West of the Rockies, I was wondering if I could solicit some advice on the trip. My thought was to stay north where the Rockies are much lower and to do some sight seeing at Glacier National Park, Badlands Nat'l park and Yellowstone. A flyby of Mt. Rushmore is also under consideration. I'm also interested in crashing at anyone along the way's house for the evening. The gentleman who is purchasing the plane has graciously told me that I can use the plane to fly around the country for pretty much as long as I wish. So, if you are a builder and can offer advice and/or local knowledge, I'd be happy to take you for a ride along the way. Thank you. Don Mei RV-4 N92CT 3B9 - Chester, CT (Grounded in a Nuclear TFR area.) "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Donald Mei" <don_mei(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Followup to Seeking XC advice Seattle to CT
Date: Nov 06, 2001
Oh yes, please reply to my email address in addition to the list as I recieve summaries only once a day. Best regards, Don Mei ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 06, 2001
From: "Gary A. Sobek" <rv6flier(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Seeking advice for long X - country Seattle to Connecticut
--- Donald Mei wrote: > > Gentlemen, > > In the next week or so, I will be flying an RV-9 from Seattle to > Bridgeport, > CT. As this will be my first time West of the Rockies, I was > wondering if I > could solicit some advice on the trip. My thought was to stay north > where > the Rockies are much lower and to do some sight seeing at Glacier > National > Park, Badlands Nat'l park and Yellowstone. A flyby of Mt. Rushmore > is also > under consideration. > > I'm also interested in crashing at anyone along the way's house for > the > evening. > > The gentleman who is purchasing the plane has graciously told me that > I can > use the plane to fly around the country for pretty much as long as I > wish. > So, if you are a builder and can offer advice and/or local knowledge, > I'd be > happy to take you for a ride along the way. > > Thank you. > > Don Mei > RV-4 N92CT > 3B9 - Chester, CT (Grounded in a Nuclear TFR area.) > > "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little > temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." > > Benjamin Franklin > Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759 > Don: Do not have any expectations about the trip. Go just for the experience. Check weather, monitor flight watch (122.0), fly like you were taught as a student pilot, do a one eighty if the weather gets bad, always have an out, and error on the safe side. Sorry I am not more specific. Glacier Park is beautiful. Mt Rushmore is a much see. I used a VOR Radial to find it. Mondel Field in New Castle, WY was my fuel stop on one trip. Also stopped at Rapid City one trip. Jackson Hole was a stop just to say I had been there but fuel was very expensive. Many nice places to stop in Idaho and Montana. I know that you will not be able to stop at all the nice places. Keep an eye on weather and always have an out. Know where the closest airport is at all times. Alway have an emergency landing area in gliding distance. ==== Gary A. Sobek "My Sanity" RV-6 N157GS O-320 Hartzell, 980.3+ Flying Hours So. CA, USA http://SoCAL_WVAF.tripod.com Find a job, post your resume. http://careers.yahoo.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 06, 2001
From: Jaye and Scott Jackson <jayeandscott(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: Thought on stiff, quiet floor
Years ago I built a sound-proofing enclosure for the single-cylinder diesel on the familie's sailboat using one-inch-thick prefab sandwich of metal foil bonded to thick, closed cell foam with a thin sheet of lead in there as well. The results were dramatic and I have some left over. The only drawback would be it's weight which provides considerable damping qualities. It cost 70$Cdn for a 4X4ft peice at a marine store. Has anyone tried using this stuff for the floor in the -6? Scott in Vancouver ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jaye and Scott Jackson" <jayeandscott(at)shaw.ca> Subject: Re: RV-List: Thought on stiff, quiet floor > > My only concern would be the chance of holding moisture up against a > structural, stressed skin for indefinite periods of time... > Scott in Vancouver > -6 finishing > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Don Hyde" <DonH(at)axonn.com> > To: "RV List (E-mail)" > Subject: RV-List: Thought on stiff, quiet floor > > > > > > I have an idea of filling the spaces between the angles on the floor with > > 3/4" thick end-grain balsa blocks, stuck down with a thin layer of epoxy, > > and then a sheet of aluminum, maybe no more than .016 epoxied on top of > > that. > > > > Sounds rigid, insulated, and not terribly expensive. A quick web search > > turned up: > > > > http://www.fiberlay.com/Pages/coresend.html > > > > with a 2X4 foot sheet of suitable balsa blocks for $25.33, which sounds > like > > pretty close to enough for an RV-6A. > > > > Does the idea have any merit, do you think? > > > > Don Hyde dhyde(at)axonn.com > > Senior Software Engineer > > Axonn Corporation http://www.axonn.com > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 06, 2001
From: Jaye and Scott Jackson <jayeandscott(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Looking for a presure switch
The local automotive shops here are unable to locate a pressure switch for me. It's 1/8th NPT, NC, 0.5psi. Anyone know where I can get one? thanks, Scott in VAncouver ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jaye and Scott Jackson" <jayeandscott(at)shaw.ca> Subject: Re: RV-List: Thought on stiff, quiet floor > > My only concern would be the chance of holding moisture up against a > structural, stressed skin for indefinite periods of time... > Scott in Vancouver > -6 finishing > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Don Hyde" <DonH(at)axonn.com> > To: "RV List (E-mail)" > Subject: RV-List: Thought on stiff, quiet floor > > > > > > I have an idea of filling the spaces between the angles on the floor with > > 3/4" thick end-grain balsa blocks, stuck down with a thin layer of epoxy, > > and then a sheet of aluminum, maybe no more than .016 epoxied on top of > > that. > > > > Sounds rigid, insulated, and not terribly expensive. A quick web search > > turned up: > > > > http://www.fiberlay.com/Pages/coresend.html > > > > with a 2X4 foot sheet of suitable balsa blocks for $25.33, which sounds > like > > pretty close to enough for an RV-6A. > > > > Does the idea have any merit, do you think? > > > > Don Hyde dhyde(at)axonn.com > > Senior Software Engineer > > Axonn Corporation http://www.axonn.com > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Clifford Begnaud" <shoeless(at)barefootpilot.com>
Subject: Re: Seeking advice for long X - country Seattle to Connecticut
Date: Nov 06, 2001
Don, Your plan to avoid the highest parts of the Rockies is a wise one. It is very easy to traverse the Rockies along a line roughly from Boise, ID to Cheyenne, WY. There are a few high sections along here, but they are easily traversed, or flown over if the weather is right. We would love to have you visit us here in Erie, CO (48V) north of Denver. 48V is also closed due to proximity to a nuclear site, but nearby Longmont, CO (2V2) is open. You are welcome to stay overnight (if you are a non smoker, my wife is horribly allergic) We are building a RV9A and would like to see yours. My wife hasn't gotten a ride in a -9 yet. (hint, hint) I realize that we are a little out of the way, but if you want visit the Denver area, come on down. Cliff RV9A -- Wings > Gentlemen, > > In the next week or so, I will be flying an RV-9 from Seattle to Bridgeport, > CT. As this will be my first time West of the Rockies, I was wondering if I > could solicit some advice on the trip. My thought was to stay north where > the Rockies are much lower and to do some sight seeing at Glacier National > Park, Badlands Nat'l park and Yellowstone. A flyby of Mt. Rushmore is also > under consideration. > > I'm also interested in crashing at anyone along the way's house for the > evening. > > The gentleman who is purchasing the plane has graciously told me that I can > use the plane to fly around the country for pretty much as long as I wish. > So, if you are a builder and can offer advice and/or local knowledge, I'd be > happy to take you for a ride along the way. > > Thank you. > > Don Mei > RV-4 N92CT > 3B9 - Chester, CT (Grounded in a Nuclear TFR area.) > > "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little > temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." > > Benjamin Franklin > Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Busick" <panamared1(at)brier.net>
Subject: Re: AS, ALT, and VSI for sale
Date: Nov 06, 2001
And how well does YOUR central nervous system recognize and interpret > data presented in numerical format? Bill brings up a very good point. I have discovered that most people who learned on analog instruments do not prefer digital readouts. On the other hand, I learned to fly with digital instruments, so I have trouble interpeting analog instuments. Likewise I learned to fly a heading on a whiskey compass, and I do not do well flying a heading on an gyro heading indicator. I have an emotional attachment to that to which I am first exposed. Bob ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Busick" <panamared1(at)brier.net>
Subject: Re: More camloc stuff
Date: Nov 06, 2001
> Any comments on the quality of their kits, post-sales customer support, > etc. would be welcome. Also, is the 4" spacing they recommend > sufficient to prevent puckering of the fiberglass between camlocs? Great, fantastic customer support. You can talk to one of their salesman and he will walk you through the steps. He will also explain what you need and why. If you need extra parts, they ship real fast! In some cases will not charge for broken parts (parts that I broke). Spacing; space them so that it looks even on both sides of the cowl, 4" for me would not work geometrically. My spacing is about 3.6890", no fiberglass puckering. I would rather use the piano hinge method, but could not make it work. I was spending 2-3 hours each time I put on the top cowl. Now it takes about 2-3 minutes. I only used the camlocs for the top cowl; piano hinges for everthing else. Installing camlocs is more time consuming than installing the piano hinge, but it is easier to mate the cowl to the fueslage with camlocs, as they have some spacing leeway, and the piano hinge has none. Recommendation, if you can make the piano hinge work, go with that. If you don't want to take a chance on having to redo the piano hinge like I had to, then go with camlocs initially. Life is great. Bob Busick ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jim jewell" <jjewell(at)telus.net>
Subject: Re: Thought on stiff, quiet floor
Date: Nov 06, 2001
Hello Don, My thinking on gluing material into the structural flooring in the footwell area on my 6A led me to put sheet metal flooring with insulation attached to it's underside. I did not like the idea of gluing to the floor structure because inspecting structure at annuals would be very difficult at the very least. Also the likelihood that moisture could be retained and lead to corrosion in the hidden floor structural areas put me off. I chose to include structurally attached flooring that is removable with screws, has spaces under it and is open at the for and aft ends so that air can freely circulate through the area. Mike Nellis has been kind enough to keep photos and drawings on his web site http://bmnellis.com under "builder ideas" at the bottom of the page click on Jim Jewell Ideas and See if you find anything that you can use or get some ideas from. Doing the floors as I have done made the whole floor area much stronger and should be quieter as well. If the bank account holds up the 6A will fly in the coming year. At witch point I will be able to assess and report as to the merrits of my efforts if any. Jim in Kelowna - the slider is now a done deal. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Hyde" <DonH(at)axonn.com> Subject: RV-List: Thought on stiff, quiet floor > > I have an idea of filling the spaces between the angles on the floor with > 3/4" thick end-grain balsa blocks, stuck down with a thin layer of epoxy, > and then a sheet of aluminum, maybe no more than .016 epoxied on top of > that. > > Sounds rigid, insulated, and not terribly expensive. A quick web search > turned up: > > http://www.fiberlay.com/Pages/coresend.html > > with a 2X4 foot sheet of suitable balsa blocks for $25.33, which sounds like > pretty close to enough for an RV-6A. > > Does the idea have any merit, do you think? > > Don Hyde dhyde(at)axonn.com > Senior Software Engineer > Axonn Corporation http://www.axonn.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ABAYMAN(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 06, 2001
Subject: Re: Looking for a presure switch
scott i just got one from vans, it also has a n/o & n/c so you can wire in a warning light. it fits right on the center port of the manifold that van sells also. scott tampa much smoother flight tonight ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 06, 2001
From: "Owens, Laird" <Owens(at)aerovironment.com>
Subject: FW: High time RVs
Heres a message from Paul Rosales (Lancaster,CA) about his problems with the RV in the last year and a half. You might note he's averaging 1.4 hours per DAY....Oh my Gawd. Laird RV-6 SoCal From: paul.rosales(at)lmco.com on Tue, Nov 6, 2001 3:10 PM Hello to the RV-List :-) Laird was off by a couple hundred hours as our RV-6A Hobbs just turned 700 hours on a trip to Las Vegas last weekend. I'd be glad to share the maintenance issues that we've had with our plane which is averaging about 1.4 flight hours per day since July 4, 2000. Our O-360 engine was new from Van's and falls under the 'piston-pin' wear warranty. It has been on oil analysis since day one with all tests coming back "All values appear normal". We run this engine with the 83deg fixed pitch Sensenich Prop and have been averaging 160 KTAS @ 7.2 gallons/hour (2500rpm) for the last 450 hours. I lean to 1380deg EGT which is 50deg rich of peak for our engine: First Flight: Leaking oil temperature sender....don't use the rubber o-ring that comes with it - use a copper gasket! A few ounces of oil sure can make a BIG mess! $0.50 repair. Also, the plate that covers my unused governor pad has leaked off and on for quite awhile after having used different sealants. Permatex Copper-Coat sealant finally fixed this one. Exhaust Hangers: Same as Laird as they too were a real nuisance. I used the hangers that came with the Vettermen exhaust system and was having problems with the 90deg angle breaking. A friend here at work sneaked in a 'G-job' and replaced the problem parts with some titanium pieces that had a gentle 90 bend.....haven't had a problem since. Larry has also redesigned the hangers to put the 90deg bend in the stainless clamp which I understand works great! Exhaust Pipe: Cracked at the ball joint in-flight (this makes a LOT of noise). I'm sure this was attributed to my hanger problems and inadequate inspections when the cowl was off...rewelded by a friend for free and is checked for cracks EVERY TIME the cowl is off. LASAR Magneto: This was a weird one....I first started having a spark plug 'fouling' problem show up on #4 lower plug that would clean up after running the RPM up to 2200 and leaning. It continued to get worse so I changed the plug AND checked (buzzed) out the wire. With a known good plug and good wire, the 'fouling' continued so this pointed to the mag. I called Unison, explained my problem and the troubleshooting I did, and they gladly sent me 2 new mags (I only asked for one and they were still in-warranty). The new mag fixed my 'fouling' problem. I never thought a mag would go bad on only one cylinder... Alternator: After 400 hours, the (Mark Landoll - Mitsubishi type) internal regulator died...$25 repair. 100 hours later, one of the screws that hold this regulator in place came loose (on the ramp). It wedged and did not allow the shaft to spin. 3 hours from home and full of gas, I cut the belt off and flew home. Free repair by same shop with Locktite used on the threads. I can monitor these screws (the tips poke out the case) with the cowl off along with exhaust pipe cracks. Brake Pads: I went through the first set in less than 100 hours and replaced...replaced again at 200 hours. Dummy me...the brakes would drag occasionally when I pulled the plane into the hangar...I thought this 'normal'. Jim Baker told me that I might have 'short' springs on the brake cylinders and to call Van's. I did, and they sent me new springs that were 4.25" long (1.25" longer than the ones I took off). Next set of pads went 450 hours... Tires: I'm on my 4th set having tried Aero Trainers with each set lasting about 200 hours (I replace tires at the first sign of 'bald' spots). I splurged on the current set of Goodyear Flight Custom IIs that recently went on to get a different 'data' point. The nosewheel was replaced at 520 hours. Wheel Pant: I bonded my intersection fairings to the pant, and recently, the rear section caught the slipstream and tore off. I had noticed it wasn't as stiff as the other side but didn't think about it ever coming off. Repaired with 6 layers of glass, and I can't EVEN bend it now. Repainted free by my brother. Airframe issues: Some chipped paint on the leading edges from the all the rain we had in Alaska :-( So far, we've been averaging about 0.75 hours of maintenance for every 10 flight hours. We have been VERY happy with the performance of our plane and all the enjoyment it has brought into our lives (so keep poundin' them rivets :-) We are planning trips to Florida at Thanksgiving and to New York at Christmas :-) My two jobs are still keeping up with the fuel bill....We have met SO MANY wonderful people around the country and look forward to meeting many more in years to come so see you on the ramp! Paul & Victoria Rosales Lancaster, CA RV-6A N628PV, 701 hours since 7/4/00 prosales(at)qnet.com > Date: Oct 23, 2001 > > From: "Owens, Laird" <Owens(at)aerovironment.com> > > Subject: High time RVs > > Sam, > > The biggest thing Gary has to watch out for is T-Birds driving on the > taxiways! You remember he got hit by a big piece of Ford tin several years > ago. He'd have many more hours on the RV if that hadn't happened. I'm > sure he'll pipe up on what problems he's had. > > I think Paul Rosales now has over 1000 hours on his RV-6a now (see the > March picture in the RV calendar). This is all since June, 2000. Paul, > what problems have you had? > > I'm coming up on 400 hrs soon. My Father and I have had the RV from SoCal > to Delaware, and Arlington to the Bahamas. The only (knock on wood) > problems to date has been a failed oil cooler (setrab at 3 hrs), an errant > hawk and sparrow (all of which have been well detailed here on the list), > and the basic maintenance of oil and tires and fuel. > > Well, I guess I take that back. The exhaust hangers have been a nuisance > since the beginning. I reworked/redesigned them several times and they've > finally been working well for the last 100 hrs. The other thing I've > replaced is the carb heat cable. The heat from the exhaust melted the > inner liner of the cable. I also have a nuisance oil lead up by the mags > that I can't seem to fix. > > Every part of the airframe is working fine except 2 small cracks in the > rudder skin radiating from a rivet, and 2 smoking rivets on the lower fwd > skin. I was also having problems keeping the fiberglass gear leg fairings > from breaking the mounting tabs (must be those rough landings), but I > finally come up with a system that has bee working well for me. > > I consider most of those things construction bugs that I've finally gotten > fixed. I look forward to many more hours of fun in the coming years. > > But the biggest problem I have is trying to keep money in the fuel > account! Oh well, it's worth it. > > Matter of fact, screw the bank account, I think I'll fly it out to Las > Cruses this weekend to join in the fun. Most of the SoCal wing that is > attending should be there around noon Friday if the usual low morning > clouds don't keep us on the ground until later. > > Look forward to seeing you all there. The rest of you keep working on your > kits. Someday it'll be SOOOOO worth it. > > Laird RV-6 > SoCal > From: > rv-list(at)matronics.com on Tue, Oct 23, 2001 7:39 AM > > Subject: > High time RVs > > > Gary, I have the same totalizer setup you have and have experienced > similar results. > > However, this post is prompted by the relatively high time on your RV. > Several of us are now approaching the 300-400 hr mark on the Hobbs (or > RMI), and no doubt would be interested in any maintenance or service > issues you have uncovered in respect to nearly 1000 hrs on your plane. > Are there any areas we need to be watching in particular as the hours > accumulate? > > Of course we anticipate 1000 hrs eventually being considered "low" time > on our planes. :-) > > Thanks in advance for your reply, > > Sam Buchanan (RV-6, 320 hrs) > "The RV Journal" http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal > > ====================== > > "Gary A. Sobek" wrote: > > > Robin: > > > > I have the MicroMonitor with the 201 sender. I use it more as a fuel > > totalizer and fuel remaining more than I do as an instantaneous fuel > > flow. I know at certain power settings to expect a certain fuel flow > > at a given altitude and if I do not, I am not leaned enough. > > > > After 969.4 flying hours, I keep track of every drop of fuel and fuel > > flow totalizer values. All of them are in a spreadsheet. Once a year, > > I evaluate the entire year data. > > > > The sender is only 2.5% accurate according to the manufacturer. My > > average last year was 3.5%. I have left it so that it show a slight > > greater fuel flow than actual. This is a built in safety factor. > > > > Yes you can get better than 5%. It is great that you have it that > > close in less than 60 hours. It is very difficult to do it on one > > tank. Run several hundred gallons of fuel keeping records. Made > > adjustments accordingly. > > > > ==== > > Gary A. Sobek > > "My Sanity" RV-6 N157GS O-320 Hartzell, > > 969+ Flying Hours So. CA, USA > > http://SoCAL_WVAF.tripod.com > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Knicholas2(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 06, 2001
Subject: Using an 0-235 in RV9A
When I first read about the RV9, I was intrigued that I could use an 0-235 engine. Smaller, economical, less expensive.... However, when I talked to someone at Van's, he almost laughed at me for considering an 0-235 and said that "everyone is using an 0-320..." I was ok with that until I read the RVator that came yesterday - it has a lengthly article emphasizing that we should not overpower an RV9 and go with NOTHING bigger than the 160 hp 0-320. So what do other listers have to say - what to you think of using the 0-235 in an RV9? I don't really care if it is a few knots slower than the 0-320 as long as it has a decent cruise speed and enough power to climb out of trouble. Ideas appreciated. Kim Nicholas RV9A finishing fuse, shopping for engine. Seattle ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bernie Kerr" <kerrjb(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: AS, ALT, and VSI for sale (Bills ??)
Date: Nov 06, 2001
Bill, Not sure I have answers to all your ?'s. I have to admit that the stalls I did were power off. I depend primarily on my AOA for stall info not airspeed. I do not normally look at airspeed when doing a 3 g accel stall, but the AOA is dead on when the break will occur. I will try to check airspeed during a power on 1 g stall next time I fly (probably over a week from now, going away in the van not the airplane for a week:>((. Will also look at it with the engine running at different rpm with aircraft static. Will the FAA approve. Don't believe they have to since it is an airspeed measurement in and experimental. Currently the R/M is hooked to the build of materials static and pitot. I was very sceptical of digital instruments since I have looked at analog displays since soloing in 1953. Using the EIS has proved to be a snap and I really enjoy the digital output. Gabe and I played holding altitude in simulated IFR on the long trip home from LOE to Fla and I can hold altitude much closer with the digital display than I can with the analog. It is not really comfortable landing on digital airspeed yet, but once again I depend heavily on the AOA anyway. Think I will adapt soon since I have now removed the analog gages. Yes, all the gages are electrical except the vacum horizon and DG. Am I concerned, probably not enough to warrant a backup battery or alternator at this point. My mind may be improved on that with time. Bernie ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Sipp" <rsipp(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Not RV-building related - What can we do to help our GA cause?
Date: Nov 06, 2001
On 11/6 Ken Brooks offered several politically oriented suggestions to help influence further relief from the current flight restrictions. As reported by EAA/AOPA, one of the NSC's primary concerns with general aviation is "not knowing where the airplane is going." I would suggest one of the best things we can do operationally is make use of VFR flight following services from ATC. This is easy to do and provides several benefits to the pilot. 1. Your altitude and route are verified and known which permits traffic advisories to other aircraft and better traffic situational awareness for you. You always have the same altimeter setting as IFR traffic in your area. Remember there is only 500 feet of clearance between your VFR altitude and opposite direction IFR traffic. 2. Easy access through various classes of controlled and restricted airspace. Center will advise on status of MOAs, class B and C etc. and in nearly all cases either hand you off to the proper agency for clearance or provide vectors around the airspace. On a recent flight I heard center very helpfully vectoring an aircraft around one of the TFR's. 3. In the event of an emergency, you are in immediate contact with someone who knows exactly where you are. With VFR flight following you have nearly all of the benefits of an IFR clearance, with the exception of flight in IMC conditions, for the price of a radio call. You are still free in nearly all cases to fly the route and altitude of your choice. Try it, you'll like it, and it may just save you unintentionally entering airspace you are not cleared into or meeting another airplane up close and personal. Do not archieve. Dick Sipp RV4 250DS ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <nauga(at)brick.net>
Subject: rv-4 gascolator
Date: Nov 06, 2001
Hit by a blinding flash of the obvious, the answers to my gascolator questions were in the archives. So...if the gascolator is not the lowest straight-path point in the fuel system, what's the difference between it and any other fuel filter? Dave Hyde nauga(at)brick.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <azpilot(at)extremezone.com>
Subject: Re: More camloc stuff
Date: Nov 06, 2001
Good post, Bob. This is exactly my set up, and experience with Skybolt. This led me to my initial post. Another post said that A couple hundred dollars on camlocs (if you do the whole cowl in camlocs, not necessary as Bob pointed out) is a drop in the bucket compared to the 40, 50, or 60K you have in the plane. I'm glad I went with the camlocs on the top. Probably a 4 hour job to rip out the hinges and replace with camlocs. Also one note, these are not Camloc brand fasteners. Skybolt has their own brand, and the quality is very, very good. So much to say that it appears to be superior than Camloc brand. I have the phillips variety (larger heads with countersunk washers) and I can't see how they could be stripped. Very hard alluminum or stainless if that is what they are. Paul Besing RV-6A N197AB Arizona http://www.lacodeworks.com/besing Flying Kitlog Pro Builder's Log Software http://www.kitlog.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Busick" <panamared1(at)brier.net> Subject: Re: RV-List: More camloc stuff > Any comments on the quality of their kits, post-sales customer support, > etc. would be welcome. Also, is the 4" spacing they recommend > sufficient to prevent puckering of the fiberglass between camlocs? Great, fantastic customer support. You can talk to one of their salesman and he will walk you through the steps. He will also explain what you need and why. If you need extra parts, they ship real fast! In some cases will not charge for broken parts (parts that I broke). Spacing; space them so that it looks even on both sides of the cowl, 4" for me would not work geometrically. My spacing is about 3.6890", no fiberglass puckering. I would rather use the piano hinge method, but could not make it work. I was spending 2-3 hours each time I put on the top cowl. Now it takes about 2-3 minutes. I only used the camlocs for the top cowl; piano hinges for everthing else. Installing camlocs is more time consuming than installing the piano hinge, but it is easier to mate the cowl to the fueslage with camlocs, as they have some spacing leeway, and the piano hinge has none. Recommendation, if you can make the piano hinge work, go with that. If you don't want to take a chance on having to redo the piano hinge like I had to, then go with camlocs initially. Life is great. Bob Busick ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 06, 2001
Subject: RV 6 Tail for Parts
From: Joe L Cabe <jscabe(at)juno.com>
I have a pre punched RV 6 tail that is still in the box that can be used for parts. I don't want to see it wasted. I bought an orphan project that had wing kit and two tail kits. Joe. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 06, 2001
From: David Wentzell <wntzl(at)execpc.com>
Subject: Re: Thoughts on stiff, quiet floor
Greetings, Based on advice that I received from Joe (Schumacher, I believe) in Oshkosh while there 2 years ago looking at 2 RV's very near completion, I am using a rigid foam from Aircraft Spruce. Fits easily between the stiffeners, adds rigidity, sound proofing, and insulation against hot feet. It is .75 thick and cuts real easily. I plan on adding a sheet of thin aluminum (from McMaster Carr) on top of it to seal it in. David Wentzell RV-6 Finishing Racine, Wisconsin ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 06, 2001
Subject: elevator balance
From: Don R Jordan <dons6a(at)juno.com>
I drilled holes in the lead on the RH elevator to balance. The LH has the trim cable + the cover + all the cover screws. I think I should remove the cable & install the cover, but the real world is the cable add a bunch of drag. What did you guys do? Also, when I torqued the pivot bolts the assembly was do longer drag free. It is smooth just stops if any force is stoppedon it. Is this normal?? Don Jordan - 6A - N6DJ Arlington, Tx ******************************* ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Meketa" <acgm(at)gvtc.com>
Subject: Re: Looking for a presure switch
Date: Nov 06, 2001
Are you looking for a single or two wire switch, what will it be used for and why the really low .5 psi open point. I will try and remember to look thru the parts books tomorrow and see what I can find. There should be several switches in the general area you are looking for. George Meketa RV8 finishing ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jaye and Scott Jackson" <jayeandscott(at)shaw.ca> RV-List: Looking for a presure switch > The local automotive shops here are unable to locate a pressure switch for > me. It's 1/8th NPT, NC, 0.5psi. > Anyone know where I can get one? > thanks, > Scott in VAncouver ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Edwin L French" <ted_french(at)canada.com>
Subject: Looking for a presure switch
Date: Nov 06, 2001
Try http://www.worldmagnetics.com/pressure.html Edwin L (Ted) French Prince George BC -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Jaye and Scott Jackson Subject: RV-List: Looking for a presure switch The local automotive shops here are unable to locate a pressure switch for me. It's 1/8th NPT, NC, 0.5psi. Anyone know where I can get one? thanks, Scott in VAncouver ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jaye and Scott Jackson" <jayeandscott(at)shaw.ca> Subject: Re: RV-List: Thought on stiff, quiet floor > > My only concern would be the chance of holding moisture up against a > structural, stressed skin for indefinite periods of time... > Scott in Vancouver > -6 finishing > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Don Hyde" <DonH(at)axonn.com> > To: "RV List (E-mail)" > Subject: RV-List: Thought on stiff, quiet floor > > > > > > I have an idea of filling the spaces between the angles on the floor with > > 3/4" thick end-grain balsa blocks, stuck down with a thin layer of epoxy, > > and then a sheet of aluminum, maybe no more than .016 epoxied on top of > > that. > > > > Sounds rigid, insulated, and not terribly expensive. A quick web search > > turned up: > > > > http://www.fiberlay.com/Pages/coresend.html > > > > with a 2X4 foot sheet of suitable balsa blocks for $25.33, which sounds > like > > pretty close to enough for an RV-6A. > > > > Does the idea have any merit, do you think? > > > > Don Hyde dhyde(at)axonn.com > > Senior Software Engineer > > Axonn Corporation http://www.axonn.com > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rvator97(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Subject: RV-6 Tail & wing kit for sale
I have a buddy who needs to sell his 6 tail and wing kits. The tail is 90% built and only the spar has been assembled on the wing kit. Any offers will be considered. Contact me off the list if you are interested and I will give his phone #. (So Cal area). Walt ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rv6238(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Subject: Re: shield strobe power wires/ EXP2 bus
Hey folks, I have my Whelen power packs mounted on each outboard wing rib. One left, one on the right. My question, should I use shielded on the wires that pass through the wing ribs to supply power . Also, I am using the EXP 2 Bus. Where do I pick up power for the engine instruments? As far as I can tell there are only 2 terminals marked 'instruments'. I have 6 gauges that need power. L-R fuel, fuel press, oil pres, oil temp, etc. I am considering using the master switch feature on the circuit board rather than an external one. I have done an archive search and got no returns on the EXP bus. Any opinions, suggestions ,etc. is greatly appreciated. Bill Griffin RV6 tip up ,IO320 ,Rose fuel inj. ,Aymar Demuth Balto. MD Rv6238(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 06, 2001
From: "Rollin Young" <rollin.young(at)acsalaska.net>
Subject: N-number 220
I was looking at "N" numbers tonight and see that N 220 is available (it says deregistered which usually means it is available). Might be fun for someone to have a low N number that is also the planes top airspeed (I am only planing on going 196). Rollin, RV8 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 06, 2001
Subject: New Email List Photo Share Available!
RV6-List(at)matronics.com, RV7-List(at)matronics.com
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/kdbrv8r@charter.net/index.html --------------------------------- EMAIL LIST PHOTO SHARE Share your files and photos with other List members simply by emailing the files to: pictures(at)matronics.com Please view the typical Share above and include the Description Text Fields as shown along with your submission of files and photos. --------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Eric Newton" <enewton57(at)cableone.net>
Subject: Re: shield strobe power wires/ EXP2 bus
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Hi Bill, I have the same set up and my answers to your questions are below: > Hey folks, > I have my Whelen power packs mounted on each outboard wing rib. One left, one > on the right. My question, should I use shielded on the wires that pass > through the wing ribs to supply power . Not needed. I used 18 AWG Tefzel wire and have no radio interference from my strobes. > Also, I am using the EXP 2 Bus. Where do I pick up power for the engine > instruments? As far as I can tell there are only 2 terminals marked > 'instruments'. I have 6 gauges that need power. L-R fuel, fuel press, oil > pres, oil temp, etc. I used a couple of terminal strips for mine. Got them at radio shack. They are insulated and I mounted them on the sub-panel so I can get to them if I ever need to add a wire. Power the terminal strips from the EXP2 bus. One terminal strip powers the instruments and the other terminal strip powers the instrument lights. Also, I went ahead and got the Indicator module from Control Vision that goes with and compliments the EXP2. It has a dimmer switch for the lights built in. >I am considering using the master switch feature on the > circuit board rather than an external one. As long as your Alternator is not rated at more than 40 Amps you are OK. Mine was 45 Amps so I went with the external master. Happy Building, Eric Newton - Long Beach, MS RV-6A N57ME (Flying) www.ericsrv6a.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Curt Reimer" <cgreimer(at)mb.sympatico.ca>
Subject: Parts for Sale
Date: Nov 07, 2001
I have a few spare parts for sale: Electric Elevator Trim Kit. Unused, in box. Purchased around 1995. This is the model with the electric gauge for trim position, not the lights. I went with manual trim. $120 Throttle cable, friction type, standard RV-6 length designed to be used with the centre console. The plastic coating is chafed a bit from rubbing on the firewall during test fittings but otherwise its new and unused. I mounted my controls on the panel itself and needed longer cables. $25 Mixture cable, vernier type, same condition. $25 Curt cgreimer(at)mb.sympatico.ca 204 958 2859 eve. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2001
From: Ken Balch <kbalch1(at)mediaone.net>
Subject: EI FP-5L installation
I'm about to install my Electronics International FP-5L fuel pressure/flow instrument and I'd like to know how people have been plumbing the transducers. I've got Airflow Performance fuel injection (with the boost pump in the cockpit per plans) and I'm thinking of putting the flow transducer low on the engine side of the firewall between the bulkhead fitting and the mechanical fuel pump. The pressure transducer would mount higher on the firewall on Van's transducer manifold. Does this sound right? I'd love to see pics of anyone's similar installation. -- Regards, Ken Balch Ashland, MA RV-8 #81125 (N118KB) installing engine stuff groups.yahoo.com/group/BostonRVBuilders/files/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tim Bryan" <tim(at)bryantechnology.com>
Subject: Re: More camloc stuff
Date: Nov 07, 2001
OK, I am convinced. Where can these be purchased? When you say Skybolt, are you reffering to the Skybolt aircraft? Ain't it GREAT to get such knowledge and depth of ideas that are actually proven out off of this list? Time to contribute. Tim Bryan RV-6 (N616TB Reserved) Installing instrument panel and about to receive engine. Will fly next summer for sure! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Besing" <azpilot(at)extremezone.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: More camloc stuff > > Good post, Bob. This is exactly my set up, and experience with Skybolt. > This led me to my initial post. Another post said that A couple hundred > dollars on camlocs (if you do the whole cowl in camlocs, not necessary as > Bob pointed out) is a drop in the bucket compared to the 40, 50, or 60K you > have in the plane. I'm glad I went with the camlocs on the top. Probably a > 4 hour job to rip out the hinges and replace with camlocs. Also one note, > these are not Camloc brand fasteners. Skybolt has their own brand, and the > quality is very, very good. So much to say that it appears to be superior > than Camloc brand. I have the phillips variety (larger heads with > countersunk washers) and I can't see how they could be stripped. Very hard > alluminum or stainless if that is what they are. > > > Paul Besing > RV-6A N197AB Arizona > http://www.lacodeworks.com/besing > Flying > Kitlog Pro Builder's Log Software > http://www.kitlog.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bob Busick" <panamared1(at)brier.net> > To: > Subject: Re: RV-List: More camloc stuff > > > > Any comments on the quality of their kits, post-sales customer support, > > etc. would be welcome. Also, is the 4" spacing they recommend > > sufficient to prevent puckering of the fiberglass between camlocs? > > Great, fantastic customer support. You can talk to one of their salesman > and he will walk you through the steps. He will also explain what you need > and why. If you need extra parts, they ship real fast! In some cases will > not charge for broken parts (parts that I broke). > > Spacing; space them so that it looks even on both sides of the cowl, 4" for > me would not work geometrically. My spacing is about 3.6890", no fiberglass > puckering. > > I would rather use the piano hinge method, but could not make it work. I > was spending 2-3 hours each time I put on the top cowl. Now it takes about > 2-3 minutes. I only used the camlocs for the top cowl; piano hinges for > everthing else. > > Installing camlocs is more time consuming than installing the piano hinge, > but it is easier to mate the cowl to the fueslage with camlocs, as they > have some spacing leeway, and the piano hinge has none. > > Recommendation, if you can make the piano hinge work, go with that. If you > don't want to take a chance on having to redo the piano hinge like I had to, > then go with camlocs initially. > > Life is great. > > Bob Busick > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2001
From: Ken Balch <kbalch1(at)mediaone.net>
Subject: Re: More camloc stuff
Skybolt Fasteners (www.skybolt.com). 800-223-1963 Ken Tim Bryan wrote: > > OK, I am convinced. Where can these be purchased? When you say Skybolt, > are you reffering to the Skybolt aircraft? > > Ain't it GREAT to get such knowledge and depth of ideas that are actually > proven out off of this list? Time to contribute. > > Tim Bryan > RV-6 (N616TB Reserved) > Installing instrument panel and about to receive engine. Will fly next > summer for sure! > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Besing" <azpilot(at)extremezone.com> > To: > Subject: Re: RV-List: More camloc stuff > > > > > Good post, Bob. This is exactly my set up, and experience with Skybolt. > > This led me to my initial post. Another post said that A couple hundred > > dollars on camlocs (if you do the whole cowl in camlocs, not necessary as > > Bob pointed out) is a drop in the bucket compared to the 40, 50, or 60K > you > > have in the plane. I'm glad I went with the camlocs on the top. Probably > a > > 4 hour job to rip out the hinges and replace with camlocs. Also one note, > > these are not Camloc brand fasteners. Skybolt has their own brand, and > the > > quality is very, very good. So much to say that it appears to be superior > > than Camloc brand. I have the phillips variety (larger heads with > > countersunk washers) and I can't see how they could be stripped. Very > hard > > alluminum or stainless if that is what they are. > > > > > > Paul Besing > > RV-6A N197AB Arizona > > http://www.lacodeworks.com/besing > > Flying > > Kitlog Pro Builder's Log Software > > http://www.kitlog.com > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Bob Busick" <panamared1(at)brier.net> > > To: > > Subject: Re: RV-List: More camloc stuff > > > > > > > > > Any comments on the quality of their kits, post-sales customer support, > > > etc. would be welcome. Also, is the 4" spacing they recommend > > > sufficient to prevent puckering of the fiberglass between camlocs? > > > > Great, fantastic customer support. You can talk to one of their salesman > > and he will walk you through the steps. He will also explain what you > need > > and why. If you need extra parts, they ship real fast! In some cases > will > > not charge for broken parts (parts that I broke). > > > > Spacing; space them so that it looks even on both sides of the cowl, 4" > for > > me would not work geometrically. My spacing is about 3.6890", no > fiberglass > > puckering. > > > > I would rather use the piano hinge method, but could not make it work. I > > was spending 2-3 hours each time I put on the top cowl. Now it takes > about > > 2-3 minutes. I only used the camlocs for the top cowl; piano hinges for > > everthing else. > > > > Installing camlocs is more time consuming than installing the piano hinge, > > but it is easier to mate the cowl to the fueslage with camlocs, as they > > have some spacing leeway, and the piano hinge has none. > > > > Recommendation, if you can make the piano hinge work, go with that. If > you > > don't want to take a chance on having to redo the piano hinge like I had > to, > > then go with camlocs initially. > > > > Life is great. > > > > Bob Busick > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Preston" <dprestonsr1(at)home.com>
Subject: Purchase of RV-6A
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Hope I am not doing something against policy. I have not used this listing before. Interested in nice RV-6A. $65K max. Building 7A but can't wait. Please email details to dprestonsr1(at)home.com. Thanks, Doug Preston Birmingham, AL 7A - wings ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: EI FP-5L installation
From: pichon.dean(at)ADLittle.com
Date: Nov 07, 2001
11/07/2001 11:11:19 AM Hi Ken, I have the same equipment in my -4. I have the fuel flow transducer mounted on the engine side of the firewall about 1/3 of the way up from the bottom. Fuel coming from the output side of the mechanical fuel pump passes through the transducer on its way to the fuel servo. The pressure transducer is also mounted engine side of the firewall, in the upper 1/3. So far everything works great. Dean Pichon Painted and flying! |--------+----------------------------------> | | Ken Balch | | | | | | Sent by: | | | owner-rv-list-server@mat| | | ronics.com | | | | | | | | | 11/07/01 09:50 AM | | | Please respond to | | | rv-list | | | | |--------+----------------------------------> | | | To: "rv-list(at)matronics.com" | | cc: | | bcc: | | Subject: RV-List: EI FP-5L installation | I'm about to install my Electronics International FP-5L fuel pressure/flow instrument and I'd like to know how people have been plumbing the transducers. I've got Airflow Performance fuel injection (with the boost pump in the cockpit per plans) and I'm thinking of putting the flow transducer low on the engine side of the firewall between the bulkhead fitting and the mechanical fuel pump. The pressure transducer would mount higher on the firewall on Van's transducer manifold. Does this sound right? I'd love to see pics of anyone's similar installation. -- Regards, Ken Balch Ashland, MA RV-8 #81125 (N118KB) installing engine stuff groups.yahoo.com/group/BostonRVBuilders/files/ **** This is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential business information. It may not be copied without our permission. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender as soon as possible and delete the material from any computer.**** ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2001
From: Ken Balch <kbalch1(at)mediaone.net>
Subject: Re: EI FP-5L installation
Hi Dean, Any pics of your installation? Ken pichon.dean(at)ADLittle.com wrote: > > Hi Ken, > > I have the same equipment in my -4. I have the fuel flow transducer > mounted on the engine side of the firewall about 1/3 of the way up from the > bottom. Fuel coming from the output side of the mechanical fuel pump > passes through the transducer on its way to the fuel servo. The pressure > transducer is also mounted engine side of the firewall, in the upper 1/3. > So far everything works great. > > Dean Pichon > Painted and flying! > > |--------+----------------------------------> > | | Ken Balch | > | | | > | | Sent by: | > | | owner-rv-list-server@mat| > | | ronics.com | > | | | > | | | > | | 11/07/01 09:50 AM | > | | Please respond to | > | | rv-list | > | | | > |--------+----------------------------------> > | | > | To: "rv-list(at)matronics.com" | > | cc: | > | bcc: | > | Subject: RV-List: EI FP-5L installation | > > > I'm about to install my Electronics International FP-5L fuel > pressure/flow instrument and I'd like to know how people have been > plumbing the transducers. > > I've got Airflow Performance fuel injection (with the boost pump in the > cockpit per plans) and I'm thinking of putting the flow transducer low > on the engine side of the firewall between the bulkhead fitting and the > mechanical fuel pump. The pressure transducer would mount higher on the > firewall on Van's transducer manifold. Does this sound right? > > I'd love to see pics of anyone's similar installation. > > -- > Regards, > Ken Balch > Ashland, MA > RV-8 #81125 (N118KB) > installing engine stuff > groups.yahoo.com/group/BostonRVBuilders/files/ > > **** This is intended for the addressee only and may contain > confidential business information. It may not be copied > without our permission. If you are not the intended recipient, > please contact the sender as soon as possible and > delete the material from any computer.**** > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Robertson" <mrobert569(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: elevator balance
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Hi Don, The bearing are new and still stiff, so what you encountered is very common. As long as they are smooth without binding you will be ok. Glad to see you are getting close. I may be in your neck of the woods at Bell during early December. I would love to be able to come by, meet you face to face, and check out your baby if you are going to be around then. Mike Robertson >From: Don R Jordan <dons6a(at)juno.com> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV-List: elevator balance >Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 22:30:13 -0600 > > >I drilled holes in the lead on the RH elevator to balance. > >The LH has the trim cable + the cover + all the cover screws. > >I think I should remove the cable & install the cover, but the real world >is the cable add a bunch of drag. > >What did you guys do? > >Also, when I torqued the pivot bolts the assembly was do longer drag >free. It is smooth just stops if any force is stoppedon it. Is this >normal?? > > >Don Jordan - 6A - N6DJ >Arlington, Tx >******************************* > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stephen J. Soule" <SSoule(at)pfclaw.com>
Subject: O-235 in RV-9A
Date: Nov 07, 2001
I'm interested in our collective thoughts about the suitability of the O-235 to the RV-9A. From reading Van's web pages it seems to me that climb performance suffers, but top speed is pretty good. Fuel economy should be exceptional. Steve Soule Huntington, VT RV-6A (flying 15 hours) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2001
From: "F. Parker Thomas" <me(at)parkerthomas.com>
Subject: Aeroelectric Bible to borrow?
Hi to the listers - Does anyone have a copy of 'Lectric Bob's Aeroelectric Bible I might be able to borrow for a month or two? He is between editions - sold out of the old one and not finished with the new. My 8 QB fuselage is coming soon and I'd like to get started planning the electrical system. Happy to pay postage both ways or pick it up in the Bay Area. Thanks, Parker F. Parker Thomas PO Box 190894 San Francisco, CA 94119 me(at)parkerthomas.com 615-293-1003 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Wheeler North <wnorth(at)sdccd.cc.ca.us>
"'twenzel@heartland-software.com'" , "'bj034(at)lafn.org'" , "'ssoule(at)pfclaw.com'""'RV-List Digest Server'"(at)matronics.com
Subject: Update on Vans Amp Gauge
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Folks, to update eveyone who has been inputting on this one, as well as lettling Van's know something is strange with their amp gauges. I ordered another new amp gauge from them, and it behaves identical to the first one. When hooked up as per their schematic, once master sw comes on (with inst sw off) the fuel gauges also come on (I have their old style isopro fuel gauges). I then left both shunt leads attached to amp gauge, and disconnected + & - from it . With the master on, the amp gauge + reads 6.75 V . If I reattach it to the inst + buss the fuel gauges come on, and the V at amp gauge + reads 2.61V. None of the other gauges seem to be able to respond at this low voltage. Both old and new gauges do this, yet the ohm meter reads infinite between the shunt side and the power/gnd side of them. So it is the gauge that allows some V leakage bypassing the inst. power sw. The other problem I had was that the Vans tach, amp, and MAP gauges all go full boat when the radio is keyed. This only happens with the king97a; my other radio, garmin 190 gps/com, doesn't cause this. And it doesn't happen if I turn the off the radio (K97) but leave the audio panel on. This happens independently of whether the amp gauge is in the circuit, which is contrary to what I had previously thought. So I'm guessing that somehow RF from the King is whakkydoodling those gauges. Any thoughts on how to fix it? It has a standard A/C antenna mounted on aft turtledeck. Anybody care to comment? thx in advance Wheeler wnorth(at)sdccd.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Nellis" <mnellis(at)peoplepc.com>
Subject: Re: Aeroelectric Bible to borrow?
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Try ordering one from the Builders Bookstore. I think he's got them in stock and he also a fellow RV builder and supporter. http://buildersbooks.com/electrical_systems1.htm Mike Nellis - http://bmnellis.com Plainfield, IL RV6 N699BM Reserved Mounting Control Surfaces Stinson 108-2 N9666K ----- Original Message ----- From: "F. Parker Thomas" <me(at)parkerthomas.com> Subject: RV-List: Aeroelectric Bible to borrow? > > Hi to the listers - > > Does anyone have a copy of 'Lectric Bob's Aeroelectric Bible I might be able > to borrow for a month or two? He is between editions - sold out of the old > one and not finished with the new. My 8 QB fuselage is coming soon and I'd > like to get started planning the electrical system. Happy to pay postage > both ways or pick it up in the Bay Area. > > Thanks, > > Parker > > > F. Parker Thomas > PO Box 190894 > San Francisco, CA 94119 > me(at)parkerthomas.com > 615-293-1003 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Subject: Gear leg fairings
From: Gary Graham <beeb(at)teleport.com>
In recent posts about some well used RVs, the owners reported on things that needed maintenance etc. I am interested in some tips on gear leg and intersection fairings. I am in the process of fitting Van's fiberglass fairings to my short gear RV-4 and could use some advice regarding a faring/gear interface that has proven to maintain alignment and has survived many hours of operations. My old fairings are single piece glass/epoxy molded off an original Van's metal faring blank, but they are a short cord without pressure recovery. These fairings have held up well, but I have had no luck keeping them positioned reliability to the gear leg. The last method I used was a .040 Al 'T' popped and pro-sealed to the top of the fairing and clamped to the leg. The 1/32" closure pin at the trailing edge of the fairing was pushed into a locating hole in the fuselage to set the rotation angle. The Al 'T' was prone to crack between the clamp and the faring, and the pin would wear out the hole. The new Van,s farings use a 1/16" pin which is more flexible and less likely to stabilize the fairing. I have the plane up, off the gear, and am ready to anchor the faring down so that I can lay up the intersection cuffs. How to anchor? Top or top and bottom? What about the use of foam to hold in place(temp. or perm.)? I would like to be able to remove the fairing for gear maintenance. Should I make the intersection cuffs with the weight off or on the wheels(fairing spread at the ends when weight on)? Anything else? Thanks in advance. Respond on or/and off list. TNX P.S. I have the Van's plans. Gary (Oregon) ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Sandhill Crane Bird Strike
Date: Nov 07, 2001
From: Larry Pardue <n5lp(at)carlsbad.net>
Listers: For those of you who don't regularly check Doug Reeves' web site, I recommend you do so today. http://www.vansaircraft.net There is an amazing and scary picture of a Littlefield, Texas based RV-6 tail, after an encounter with a sandhill crane. I wish Dana would give us a few details, like how did this plane fly with the whole right side of the horizontal stabilizer wadded up like tin foil and with the elevator severely bent. I always had the least confidence in the tail pieces, based on eyeball engineering, when building my airplane. Harmon and F-1 Rocket experience and pictures like this, which seems to show the basic structure intact after a horrendous blow, certainly help my confidence in Van's engineering. Laird - Red Tailed Hawk Dana - Sandhill Crane The ante is definitely being upped. Not that many bigger birds. Andean Condor? Larry Pardue Carlsbad, NM RV-6 N441LP http://www.carlsbadnm.com/n5lp/index.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
From: PANELCUT(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Subject: Re: Fuel Cap Engraving
Group Caps shipped today, all but a couple. I will be in contact with those that didn't, so if you do not get an e-mail from me your in luck! Thanks Steve ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2001
From: "Owens, Laird" <Owens(at)aerovironment.com>
Subject: Sandhill Crane Bird Strike
snip Laird - Red Tailed Hawk Dana - Sandhill Crane The ante is definitely being upped. Not that many bigger birds. Andean Condor? snip I'll leave the Condor for someone else (although there are some here in SoCal). I'm not interested in playing this game anymore ;-) I've done my share...... Laird Hawk Killer SoCal ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ABAYMAN(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Subject: Re: Update on Vans Amp Gauge
wheeler i just went checked my panel, as i have all of vans gauges. i am not expereincing the problem you are having. when i turn the gauges switch off, every gauge goes off. the only thing i noticed is that if the cht or egt sensors are not connected the gauges peg out on the high side, once the probes are hooked up, they go to a normal reading. but everything else checks ok. you might have a wire touching somewhere you don't know about yet. i did have to order a new electric tack and sender, because the tack was not working and i didn't know if it was the sender or the gauge, vans sent me both at no charge, and asked that i send the good part back once i found out what was bad. nice folks those guys at vans. good luck scott tampa rv6a painting ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ABAYMAN(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Subject: Re: Update on Vans Amp Gauge
steve maybe you just got a bad one. i have seen mine go from a fresh battery reading 14 volts to a dead battery which reads 6 volts. all the gauges are still working, but the battery want start the engine, or even turn it over. scott tampa ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2001
From: "Builder's Bookstore" <winterland(at)rkymtnhi.com>
Subject: Re: Sandhill Crane Bird Strike
Jim Bower wrote: > > Good thing pterodactyls are extinct! > These are big birds. I used to sneak into their formations with an ultralight when I lived in New Mexico. Sure wouldn't want to go head to head into them in the RV. Andy ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2001
From: barry pote <barrypote(at)home.com>
Subject: RV9 heads up
I recently purchased the Van's PREVIEW PLANS SET for the RV9a. I am in the latter stages of the fuselage, but it is a good item to have. As mentioned by some in earlier postings, the part number to plan page to 'how the part is supplied' is a very useful index. In addition, I have found that many errors have been corrected in the plans. i.e radius location measurements on drawing 29 for f652 the upper baggage bulkhead are wrong on my full sized plans, but correct in the 'little guys' in the preview set. Page 29 did not make sense and I fretted for an hour, trying to think it through. I will consult the preview plans more quickly, in the future to see if there are updates. Barry POte RV9a fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Sears" <sears(at)searnet.com>
Subject: Re: Sandhill Crane Bird Strike
Date: Nov 07, 2001
> There is an amazing and scary picture of a Littlefield, Texas based RV-6 > tail, after an encounter with a sandhill crane. I wish Dana would give > us a few details, like how did this plane fly with the whole right side > of the horizontal stabilizer wadded up like tin foil and with the > elevator severely bent. I hate to tell you guys this; but, this airplane is not in Texas. It's in Kentucky. It belongs to a local who keeps it at Pat Patterson's field near Shelbyville, KY. I'm not sure how Dana got the picture unless it came from Van's. Pat sent a photo there. I have another view of the stabilizer that will really scare you. What Dana has is the good side. The bottom is far worse. Oh, yeah. Somebody mentioned this being a California airplane that was crashed some time ago. Yep. That's the one. I helped Pat rebuild it. It was really looking good before the bird hit it. We aren't sure what kind of bird; but, we're thinking it may have been a duck. The owner said he knew he'd been hit; but, the airplane handled just fine all the way to landing. He was in downwind when he was hit. Jim Sears in KY RV-6A N198JS ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6bldr(at)home.com>
Subject: Sigmatek Vacumn Pump fittings
Date: Nov 08, 2001
Does anyone know a source for the two fittings that screw into the Sigmatek Vacumn Pump for attaching the two hoses? Jerry Calvert Edmond Ok -6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Norman" <nhunger(at)sprint.ca>
Subject: Re: Thought on stiff, quiet floor
Date: Nov 07, 2001
> I have an idea of filling the spaces between the angles on the floor with > 3/4" thick end-grain balsa blocks, stuck down with a thin layer of epoxy, > and then a sheet of aluminum, maybe no more than .016 epoxied on top of > that. > Does the idea have any merit, do you think? Sounds flammable and fluid absorbent. If it gets wet it will stay heavy for a long time and create those interesting moldy odors until you dig it out. Probably the worst thing you could put down there if you get a fuel leak or, God forbid, have a fire. Just one opinion, worth what you paid for it. Here's what I did: Many builders have expressed how the side by side RV's are quieter and have less vibration when the floorboards are stiffened. The floor is divided up into five sections. I built a strong 063 deck out of my center section from the firewall to the spar. The large plate of 063 has 3/4 X 3/4 angle riveted on it's edges that fits between the angle stiffening the floor. The new angle has rows of nutplates on them so that the deck attaches with screws that go in sideways from the next bay on each side. The result is like a strong box frame up the middle of the floor. At the front a custom small battery box holds my 625 jetski battery and the back makes a solid place for the custom fuel selector valve platform to come down to. This smaller platform is also quite beefy as I plan to base a Ram-mount system there to hold a future installation of a moving map computer. I'm going to wait till I need it as I'm hoping for some more improvements. I want a removable computer half the size of current laptops but sunlight readable, email friendly, and spreadsheet capable. In the middle of the floor platform lie dual Halon fire extinguishers, one for the cabin, the other plumbed to the engine. I don't think my floor boards are going to vibrate, lots of weight on them. Be sure to remember to tie the angle to the wing spar once the wings are on. This is a small detail on one of the plans that would be very easy to miss. I wonder how many RV6's are flying around without them. Product Report: From Orndorf the floor insulating material is very good. It passed my backyard flame test. I like the density and it fits well. I will install it with velcro so that it can be cleaned once and awhile. Regards, Norman Hunger RV6A Delta BC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Planejoel(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Subject: User way point Garmin95
I have been creating user way point using Lat Long for getting around the nuc plants and B space. Has anyone stored these user way points in a route. I have no problem with regular waypoints. For some reason I dont get a USE. GO to works fine. A page # in the book would be appreciated. Thanks ahead. Joe RV6A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: TColeE(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Subject: Re: Sandhill Crane Bird Strike
Man I messed up on the story on this one. I read my Email from Dana and being up all night and tired I put out some erroneous information. forgive my hast in forewarding the information. Sorry. Terry E. Cole ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Robertson" <mrobert569(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Sigmatek Vacumn Pump fittings
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Try Aircraft Spruce Catalog, page 109 in this years book. >From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6bldr(at)home.com> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: RV-List: Sigmatek Vacumn Pump fittings >Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 05:10:49 -0600 > > >Does anyone know a source for the two fittings that screw into the Sigmatek >Vacumn Pump for attaching the two hoses? > >Jerry Calvert >Edmond Ok -6 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2001
From: Arthur Glaser <airplane(at)megsinet.net>
Charlesww Webber , Colin Koebel , Gary Glaser , greg , irish1wild3d , jaugilas , "mike.nellis(at)mcd.com" , "Pegit2(at)aol.com" , shakib a qutob , sue gregor , "rv-list(at)matronics.com"
Subject: [Fwd: Flight Path]
EarlStark(at)aol.com wrote: > http://www.usatoday.com/graphics/news/gra/gflightpath2/flash.htm > > Copy the address to your browser. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <komisar(at)prodigy.net>
Subject: Re: RV 6 Tail for Parts
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Joe, Are the tail parts all there, complete. If so, what is your BOTTOM dollar? Where are you located? Thanks, Marty ----- Original Message ----- From: Joe L Cabe <jscabe(at)juno.com> Subject: RV-List: RV 6 Tail for Parts > > > I have a pre punched RV 6 tail that is still in the box that can be used > for parts. I don't want to see it wasted. I bought an orphan project > that had wing kit and two tail kits. > > Joe. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2001
From: "Boyd C. Braem" <bcbraem(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Isolator Mounts
Austin-- There are two problems with trying get the "correct" torque on your engine mounting bolts: (1) when the spacer "bottoms out" between the two "muffins", that's it; (2) then, you need to adjust the castellated nut so the cotter pin will fit thru the bolt hole. So, snug up the nut to the "bottom", adjust slightly for cotter pin, insert cotter pin, finish rest of plane and go flyin'. Boyd. Austin wrote: > > > Hi Listers, > What is the proper torque value for the Barry Mounts ? > The manual gives none but says it is easy to do because you just tighten > until the spacer tubes bottom out and stop you. > But in BIngelis's book, he says this is WRONG,WRONG, since you are not > supposed to squish the s*** out of the rubber mounts since this defeats the > design function....I have looked everywhere but can't find a > number.......what have others done ?? > Austin > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Bobpaulo(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Subject: proseal
I need to add a little proseal over some shop rivet heads partially metal and some proseal. You guys think it would be ok to add a blob? Thanks Bob ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Weiler" <doug.weiler(at)pressenter.com>
Subject: Re: Gear leg fairings
Date: Nov 07, 2001
> In recent posts about some well used RVs, the owners reported on things that > needed maintenance etc. I am interested in some tips on gear leg and > intersection fairings. I am in the process of fitting Van's fiberglass > fairings to my short gear RV-4 and could use some advice regarding a > faring/gear interface that has proven to maintain alignment and has survived > many hours of operations. My old fairings are single piece glass/epoxy > molded off an original Van's metal faring blank, but they are a short cord > without pressure recovery. These fairings have held up well, but I have had > no luck keeping them positioned reliability to the gear leg. The last > method I used was a .040 Al 'T' popped and pro-sealed to the top of the > fairing and clamped to the leg. The 1/32" closure pin at the trailing edge > of the fairing was pushed into a locating hole in the fuselage to set the > rotation angle. The Al 'T' was prone to crack between the clamp and the > faring, and the pin would wear out the hole. The new Van,s farings use a > 1/16" pin which is more flexible and less likely to stabilize the fairing. > > I have the plane up, off the gear, and am ready to anchor the faring down so > that I can lay up the intersection cuffs. > > How to anchor? Top or top and bottom? > > What about the use of foam to hold in place(temp. or perm.)? I would like > to be able to remove the fairing for gear maintenance. > > Should I make the intersection cuffs with the weight off or on the > wheels(fairing spread at the ends when weight on)? > > Anything else? > > Thanks in advance. > > Respond on or/and off list. TNX P.S. I have the Van's plans. > > Gary (Oregon) > Gary: I am right in the middle of this project on my RV-4 (long gear legs). According to the gear fairing plans, they are anchored using a hose clamp at the top of the fairing that clamps down on a notch that is cut out at the top of the fairing. I assume the bottom is held in place with it's intersection of the wheel pant (I haven't gotten that far yet. I did align the gear fairing with the weight off the gear as per Van's instructions. I am trying to mold the clay now for the top intersection fairing. I have a 1993 flying RV-4 (short gear) with Van's old style 2-piece alum fairings. They have never moved and seem fine after 600 hours. Doug Weiler Hudson, WI ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Weiler" <doug.weiler(at)pressenter.com>
Subject: RV-3 for sale
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Fellow Listers: One of our MN Wing members has his RV-3 for sale. Doug Weiler Details: Do you know of anyone that's looking for an RV-3? I have mine for sale for $19,500. O-290 full inverted fuel and oil, all wing mods done. Dan Thompson Blue Earth MN 507-526-2914 dat(at)bevcomm.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MeangreenRV4(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Subject: Re: rv-4 gascolator
In a message dated 11/6/2001 6:46:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, nauga(at)brick.net writes: > > Hit by a blinding flash of the obvious, > the answers to my gascolator questions > were in the archives. So...if the gascolator > is not the lowest straight-path point in the > fuel system, what's the difference between it > and any other fuel filter? > > Dave Hyde > nauga(at)brick.net > Most good gascolators can pass fuel but not water ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2001
From: Kevin Horton <khorton(at)cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: rv-4 gascolator
> >Hit by a blinding flash of the obvious, >the answers to my gascolator questions >were in the archives. So...if the gascolator >is not the lowest straight-path point in the >fuel system, what's the difference between it >and any other fuel filter? > >Dave Hyde >nauga(at)brick.net I'm certainly no expert, but I think the difference is that the gascolator will still flow fuel after swallowing a bunch of water. Paper element fuel filters apparently may stop flowing fuel after the paper swells up from the water. I'm told some other types of filter may be OK with water. So, if you want to use a filter, I suggest you do some sort of test to show whether it is OK with water or not. Take care, Kevin Horton RV-8 (engine installation & electrics) khorton(at)cyberus.ca (613) 821-7862 (home) Ottawa, Canada (613) 952-4319 (work) http://eccentrix.com/misc/rv8/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Subject: Re: RV 6 Tail for Parts
From: Joe L Cabe <jscabe(at)juno.com>
Marty, Yep, all parts. Several responses so far but no offers. I'm asking $500 or less. Maybe trade for a working DG or horizon. Call me. Joe Canton, Oh 330-854-1213 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Alex Peterson" <alexpeterson(at)usjet.net>
"RV List"
Subject: 66AP 40 hour report - long
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Having just completed the 40 hours on my -6A, I thought it might be helpful and/or interesting to share a few things with the list. First, these planes are waaaayyy cool, those of you building keep chugging along, it can't be repeated enough that it is worth it. At 8 hours I took the exhaust off, and Larry V. reworked them to try to get a little more clearance in the cowl exit area. I did this during the class B grounding, so no time was lost. Also, the left ball joint was at a funny angle, which caused it to be at the limit of its travel. Several adjustments have been made to the pipe supports. At around 15 hours, I removed the nose gear to replace the standard AN bolt with a close tolerance AN bolt. I didn't like the "clicking" I would hear when the plane was rocked side to side on the ground. At the same time, I noticed that the fiberglass nose gear fairing was a little too long, and was beginning to crack just above where it is clamped to the nose gear. The fix was to grind a little off the aft/top end. Apparently, during flexing, the gear effectively gets shorter, jamming the fairing. Several adjustments have been made to the idle mixture on the Airflow Performance FI system, still need to lean it a little more - symptom: afterfiring on throttle reductions and loping idle. Leaning tests show that I can reduce fuel consumption by about .5 gph by tuning the injectors. This test is where EGT peak is compared to fuel flow for each cylinder, and I got a span of about .5 gph. I lean based on the cylinder which leans at the highest fuel flow. Cut one jumper wire that I missed during installation on the Century 2000 autopilot, which uncoupled the heading bug from the radio pointer. That is truly a nice piece of equipment. I went through the engine area, and put blobs of RTV everwhere it looked liked something might be chafing, or thinking about it. Mainly this was SCAT tubing. No adjustments made to any flight controls, the elevator at cruise rides maybe 1/8" down, trim neutral. A balsa wood rudder trim was guessed correctly the first try, pure luck. Next time spinner is off, I will dial down max RPM hard stop about 50 rpm or so. Brake reservoir slopped some juice out during inverted flight, need to put some sort of condom on it. Speed run made at 7500MSL, full throttle, full RPM, 4 directions showed a TAS of 180.7 knots, or about 208 mph (this speed was calculated from the four ground speeds recorded using vector equations). I have two boarding steps, two Comant bent whips, transponder and GPS antennae hanging out, so this speed is nicely surprising. About 100 landings so far, the 6A's are really a dream to land, only about one crummy landing so far (my excuse was strong crosswinds). I'm really looking forward to giving my patient wife a ride this weekend, kids are right behind her! Alex Peterson Maple Grove, MN 6A N66AP flying 40 hours!! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Russell Duffy" <rv82(at)home.com>
Subject: 66AP 40 hour report - long
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Brake reservoir slopped some juice out during inverted flight, need to put some sort of condom on it. ----------------- I'm embarrassed to say that I researched this topic after installing the inverted oil system on my -8. Trojan makes a polyurethane condom that is unaffected by our brake fluid. The fluid will attack latex (swells to an impressive size) and vinyl (gets brittle). The only problem with the Trojan is that it only comes in a lubricated form, so you might want to clean it off. Note that it's not good to let people see you cleaning these, or they think you're really cheap :-) BTW- nice report. Russell Duffy Navarre, FL RV-8, 80587, N174KT (Flying 82 hours)- FOR SALE RV-3, Rotary engine project ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Meketa" <acgm(at)gvtc.com>
Subject: Re: Looking for a presure switch
Date: Nov 07, 2001
Scott There is a pressure switch close to what you are asking for. 1/8"-27 Dryseal thread term."P"-"S" NC,opens at 1.0 psi term "P"-"I" NO, closes at 2.5 - 8.0 psi Standard Ignition Part Number PS-64 GM Part Number 3986857 This is the longer style, similar to the old small block Chevy single wire switches. There is another switch which is shorter, but with 1/4" pipe thread and the same wiring configuration. Standard Ignition # PS-136, GM #1249945 or # 25500673. Application is 70 - 79 General Motors and Triumph Products. They are three wire oil pressure / choke switches. I am unsure of the availability. Let me know if you have no luck locating one. I would still like to know what you are using the switch for. George Meketa RV8QB installing wings Saturday A.M. -> The local automotive shops here are unable to locate a pressure switch for > me. It's 1/8th NPT, NC, 0.5psi. > Anyone know where I can get one? > thanks, > Scott in VAncouver ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 08, 2001
Subject: Re: Sigmatek Vacumn Pump fittings
In a message dated 11/7/01 3:12:31 PM Pacific Standard Time, rv6bldr(at)home.com writes: > Does anyone know a source for the two fittings that screw into the Sigmatek > Vacuum Pump for attaching the two hoses? The ones you probably need are the 1K8-6-10 ($56.95 at Chief, $68.95 at ACS) for the outflow and the 1K1-6-10 for the intake ($26.50 at Chief, $29.50 at ACS). Wag Aero formerly carried these P/Ns at a substantial savings, but they are conspicuous in their absence in their latest catalogs. It might be worth a call to them. The price of these things is outrageous because they're two piece dip brazed, today made by one supplier (Airborne) and only in small batches. -GV (RV-6A N1GV) vanremog(at)aol.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 08, 2001
From: Larry & Karen Gooding <GOODING(at)hargray.com>
Subject: Happy Birthday Marines
November 10th will mark the 226th birthday of the U. S. Marine Corps. The event is normally observed with fancy dress balls and serious libation. Happy Birthday to all Marines, and "Thank You!" for our freedom. Karen & Larry Gooding ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom & Cathy Ervin" <tcervin(at)valkyrie.net>
Subject: Constant Speed Prop Spinner
Date: Nov 08, 2001
List: Anyone have a Templet available for making the cuts on a spinner being used with a Hartzell Prop? I checked the archives but no luck. Tom in Ohio RV6-A looks like a Plane ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill VonDane" <n8vd(at)earthlink.net>
"Rv8list(at)Egroups.Com" , "Vansairforce"
Subject: Engine Baffles...
Date: Nov 08, 2001
Anybody made a better mouse trap? I am looking to make my own engine baffles and am looking for any templates that builders have made that may be better than Van's, or that are simply in an electronic format that I can take down to the local Kinko's and have printed off... Exhaust went on tonight and fit perfectly... Thanks... -Bill VonDane Colorado Springs, CO RV-8A - N8VD - Finish http://vondane.com/rv8a/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6bldr(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Sigmatek Vacumn Pump fittings
Date: Nov 08, 2001
This is some great information. Takes the guess work out on figuring part numbers! I will check to see if Wag Aero has any left. I couldn't believe the price of these things! Not much to them, but the design does lead to longer pump life, so I guess it evens out in the long run. Thanks, Jerry Calvert ----- Original Message ----- From: <Vanremog(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: Sigmatek Vacumn Pump fittings > > In a message dated 11/7/01 3:12:31 PM Pacific Standard Time, rv6bldr(at)home.com > writes: > > > > Does anyone know a source for the two fittings that screw into the Sigmatek > > Vacuum Pump for attaching the two hoses? > > The ones you probably need are the 1K8-6-10 ($56.95 at Chief, $68.95 at ACS) > for the outflow and the 1K1-6-10 for the intake ($26.50 at Chief, $29.50 at > ACS). Wag Aero formerly carried these P/Ns at a substantial savings, but > they are conspicuous in their absence in their latest catalogs. It might be > worth a call to them. The price of these things is outrageous because > they're two piece dip brazed, today made by one supplier (Airborne) and only > in small batches. > > -GV (RV-6A N1GV) > vanremog(at)aol.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6bldr(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Engine Baffles...
Date: Nov 08, 2001
Bill, I used Van's baffle kit on my -6 , 0-320 and it fit very well. I would hate to think about making them from scratch! Even with the preformed kit, I had them off and on about 40 times just tweeking them to the fit I wanted. If you do roll your own, the back two pieces will be the most complex. Try to get some drawings that have the actual degrees indicated for the bends. I also used the small #6 washers under the shop heads of the pop rivets that hold the baffle fabric on and highly recommend it. No longer baffled about the baffles, Jerry Calvert Edmond Ok -6 ----- Original Message ----- From: Bill VonDane <n8vd(at)earthlink.net> ; Vansairforce Subject: RV-List: Engine Baffles... > > Anybody made a better mouse trap? I am looking to make my own engine > baffles and am looking for any templates that builders have made that may be > better than Van's, or that are simply in an electronic format that I can > take down to the local Kinko's and have printed off... > > Exhaust went on tonight and fit perfectly... > > Thanks... > > -Bill VonDane > Colorado Springs, CO > RV-8A - N8VD - Finish > http://vondane.com/rv8a/ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "rickjory" <rickjory(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Engine Baffles...
Date: Nov 08, 2001
I have to complement Bill . . . he belongs to the group of builders that wants to end up with a great machine . . . but do as much $ savings as practical. Having said this, I echo the comment below. I used Van's kit on my 8A and wouldn't dream of doing this (*&@# from scratch. Just my two cents. Good luck, Bill. Rick ----- Original Message ----- From: Jerry Calvert <rv6bldr(at)home.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: Engine Baffles... > > Bill, > > I used Van's baffle kit on my -6 , 0-320 and it fit very well. I would hate > to think about making them from scratch! Even with the preformed kit, I had > them off and on about 40 times just tweeking them to the fit I wanted. If > you do roll your own, the back two pieces will be the most complex. Try to > get some drawings that have the actual degrees indicated for the bends. I > also used the small #6 washers under the shop heads of the pop rivets that > hold the baffle fabric on and highly recommend it. > > No longer baffled about the baffles, > Jerry Calvert > Edmond Ok > -6 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Bill VonDane <n8vd(at)earthlink.net> > To: Rv-List(at)Matronics.Com ; Rv8list(at)Egroups.Com > ; Vansairforce > Subject: RV-List: Engine Baffles... > > > > > > Anybody made a better mouse trap? I am looking to make my own engine > > baffles and am looking for any templates that builders have made that may > be > > better than Van's, or that are simply in an electronic format that I can > > take down to the local Kinko's and have printed off... > > > > Exhaust went on tonight and fit perfectly... > > > > Thanks... > > > > -Bill VonDane > > Colorado Springs, CO > > RV-8A - N8VD - Finish > > http://vondane.com/rv8a/ > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 08, 2001
From: "Gary Zilik" <zilik(at)bewellnet.com>
Subject: Re: [rv8list] Engine Baffles...
Bill, I made my own baffles from Van's prints. I Glued the prints to poster board, cut them out and bent them up to check the fit to the engine. I have to say my templates fit better than the baffle kit's van's was producing at the time. I have since used Van's kit on a couple of installs and find that it fits pretty good with the rear baffle behind #3 cylinder the current problem spot. Van's prints dont have all the little attachment parts on them so you need a copy of the instructions that come with the baffle kit. It took me about 6 hours to make all the baffle parts Gary Bill VonDane wrote: > Anybody made a better mouse trap? I am looking to make my own engine > baffles and am looking for any templates that builders have made that may be > better than Van's, or that are simply in an electronic format that I can > take down to the local Kinko's and have printed off... > > Exhaust went on tonight and fit perfectly... > > Thanks... > > -Bill VonDane > Colorado Springs, CO > RV-8A - N8VD - Finish > http://vondane.com/rv8a/ > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Besing" <azpilot(at)extremezone.com>
Subject: Re: Engine Baffles...
Date: Nov 08, 2001
If you still value your sanity, Don't do it, Bill!!! Paul Besing RV-6A N197AB Arizona http://www.lacodeworks.com/besing Flying Kitlog Pro Builder's Log Software http://www.kitlog.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill VonDane" <n8vd(at)earthlink.net> ; "Vansairforce" Subject: RV-List: Engine Baffles... Anybody made a better mouse trap? I am looking to make my own engine baffles and am looking for any templates that builders have made that may be better than Van's, or that are simply in an electronic format that I can take down to the local Kinko's and have printed off... Exhaust went on tonight and fit perfectly... Thanks... -Bill VonDane Colorado Springs, CO RV-8A - N8VD - Finish http://vondane.com/rv8a/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Marines
From: "Bob Lueder" <Blueder(at)SUPERIORAIRPARTS.COM>
Date: Nov 08, 2001
11/08/2001 08:09:26 AM Semper Fi Larry !! and happy birthday. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ABAYMAN(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 08, 2001
Subject: Re: Constant Speed Prop Spinner
tom can you wait a couple days, i'm leaving for arkansas for a couple days, but would be glad to make one for you when i got back. scott tampa ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: More bird strike pictures
Date: Nov 08, 2001
From: "Reeves, Doug" <Douglas.Reeves(at)archongroup.com>
Pat Patterson sent me (3) more pictures and some updated information of the recent 6A bird strike in Kentucky. Currently they think it was a mallard duck. http://www.vansaircraft.net Best, D ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chuck Rabaut" <crabaut(at)coalinga.com>
Subject: proseal
Date: Nov 08, 2001
Speaking of pro-seal... I'm considering using a little to seal up the edge of my canopy. Anyone know of, or have any negative comments or experiences with pro-seal re-acting with the plexi-glass? Thanks, Chuck ----- Original Message ----- From: <Bobpaulo(at)aol.com> Subject: RV-List: proseal > > I need to add a little proseal over some shop rivet heads partially metal and > some proseal. You guys think it would be ok to add a blob? > Thanks Bob > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chuck Rabaut" <crabaut(at)coalinga.com>
Subject: rv-4 gascolator
Date: Nov 08, 2001
I'm switching over to an "IO-320" (converted by Ly-Con) will my current gascolator work? What kind of pressures will I be running with my Bendix fuel injection unit? What happens when one or two injectors get plugged? I was told that the pressures will double, then quad-druple, is that true? Chuck ----- Original Message ----- From: Kevin Horton <khorton(at)cyberus.ca> Subject: Re: RV-List: rv-4 gascolator > > > > >Hit by a blinding flash of the obvious, > >the answers to my gascolator questions > >were in the archives. So...if the gascolator > >is not the lowest straight-path point in the > >fuel system, what's the difference between it > >and any other fuel filter? > > > >Dave Hyde > >nauga(at)brick.net > > > I'm certainly no expert, but I think the difference is that the gascolator > will still flow fuel after swallowing a bunch of water. Paper element fuel > filters apparently may stop flowing fuel after the paper swells up from the > water. I'm told some other types of filter may be OK with water. So, if > you want to use a filter, I suggest you do some sort of test to show > whether it is OK with water or not. > > Take care, > > > Kevin Horton RV-8 (engine installation & electrics) > khorton(at)cyberus.ca (613) 821-7862 (home) > Ottawa, Canada (613) 952-4319 (work) > http://eccentrix.com/misc/rv8/ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 08, 2001
From: Garry LeGare <"versadek"@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: rv-4 gascolator
A gascolator works on the principal that water is heavier than gasoline. The larger the volume of the reservoir, the more water it holds, but eventually, if not drained, it will fill with water and allow the water to pass thru. That is why we are taught to drain the tanks and gascolator before flight. Most gascolators are just a reservoir ( to let the water settle out) with a medium mess screen to filter out rocks and small children from your fuel system. Take one apart you will see what I mean. Garry "Casper" MeangreenRV4(at)aol.com wrote: > > In a message dated 11/6/2001 6:46:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, > nauga(at)brick.net writes: > > > > > Hit by a blinding flash of the obvious, > > the answers to my gascolator questions > > were in the archives. So...if the gascolator > > is not the lowest straight-path point in the > > fuel system, what's the difference between it > > and any other fuel filter? > > > > Dave Hyde > > nauga(at)brick.net > > > > Most good gascolators can pass fuel but not water > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 08, 2001
From: Garry LeGare <"versadek"@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: rv-4 gascolator
Dave, I have done extensive long term testing with paper element filters. I have talked to Wix filter engineers. Their findings are that their filters do not stop water flowing thru them, nor do they stop gas flowing thru them, when the element is saturated with water. My testing with Wix and Fram filters agree with them. However, I wouldn't fly with any other brands as they may stop the flow of gas when their element becomes saturated with water. There was a thread on this subject earlier this year, check the archives. Garry "Casper" Kevin Horton wrote: > > > > >Hit by a blinding flash of the obvious, > >the answers to my gascolator questions > >were in the archives. So...if the gascolator > >is not the lowest straight-path point in the > >fuel system, what's the difference between it > >and any other fuel filter? > > > >Dave Hyde > >nauga(at)brick.net > > I'm certainly no expert, but I think the difference is that the gascolator > will still flow fuel after swallowing a bunch of water. Paper element fuel > filters apparently may stop flowing fuel after the paper swells up from the > water. I'm told some other types of filter may be OK with water. So, if > you want to use a filter, I suggest you do some sort of test to show > whether it is OK with water or not. > > Take care, > > Kevin Horton RV-8 (engine installation & electrics) > khorton(at)cyberus.ca (613) 821-7862 (home) > Ottawa, Canada (613) 952-4319 (work) > http://eccentrix.com/misc/rv8/ > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 08, 2001
From: Garry LeGare <"versadek"@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: 66AP 40 hour report - long
Congrats for making it to the magic, take the wife for a ride, mark and thanks for the update. Here is a little secret, take your wife somewhere unique to go shopping. BIG brownie points. Garry "Casper" Alex Peterson wrote: > > Having just completed the 40 hours on my -6A, I thought it might be helpful > and/or interesting to share a few things with the list. First, these planes > are waaaayyy cool, those of you building keep chugging along, it can't be > repeated enough that it is worth it. > > At 8 hours I took the exhaust off, and Larry V. reworked them to try to get > a little more clearance in the cowl exit area. I did this during the class > B grounding, so no time was lost. Also, the left ball joint was at a funny > angle, which caused it to be at the limit of its travel. Several > adjustments have been made to the pipe supports. > > At around 15 hours, I removed the nose gear to replace the standard AN bolt > with a close tolerance AN bolt. I didn't like the "clicking" I would hear > when the plane was rocked side to side on the ground. At the same time, I > noticed that the fiberglass nose gear fairing was a little too long, and was > beginning to crack just above where it is clamped to the nose gear. The fix > was to grind a little off the aft/top end. Apparently, during flexing, the > gear effectively gets shorter, jamming the fairing. > > Several adjustments have been made to the idle mixture on the Airflow > Performance FI system, still need to lean it a little more - symptom: > afterfiring on throttle reductions and loping idle. > > Leaning tests show that I can reduce fuel consumption by about .5 gph by > tuning the injectors. This test is where EGT peak is compared to fuel flow > for each cylinder, and I got a span of about .5 gph. I lean based on the > cylinder which leans at the highest fuel flow. > > Cut one jumper wire that I missed during installation on the Century 2000 > autopilot, which uncoupled the heading bug from the radio pointer. That is > truly a nice piece of equipment. > > I went through the engine area, and put blobs of RTV everwhere it looked > liked something might be chafing, or thinking about it. Mainly this was > SCAT tubing. > > No adjustments made to any flight controls, the elevator at cruise rides > maybe 1/8" down, trim neutral. > > A balsa wood rudder trim was guessed correctly the first try, pure luck. > > Next time spinner is off, I will dial down max RPM hard stop about 50 rpm or > so. > > Brake reservoir slopped some juice out during inverted flight, need to put > some sort of condom on it. > > Speed run made at 7500MSL, full throttle, full RPM, 4 directions showed a > TAS of 180.7 knots, or about 208 mph (this speed was calculated from the > four ground speeds recorded using vector equations). I have two boarding > steps, two Comant bent whips, transponder and GPS antennae hanging out, so > this speed is nicely surprising. > > About 100 landings so far, the 6A's are really a dream to land, only about > one crummy landing so far (my excuse was strong crosswinds). > > I'm really looking forward to giving my patient wife a ride this weekend, > kids are right behind her! > > Alex Peterson > Maple Grove, MN > 6A N66AP flying 40 hours!! > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randall Henderson" <randallh(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: proseal
Date: Nov 08, 2001
posted by: "Chuck Rabaut" > > Speaking of pro-seal... I'm considering using a little to seal up the edge > of my canopy. Anyone know of, or have any negative comments or experiences > with pro-seal re-acting with the plexi-glass? Thanks, Proseal won't hurt the plexi. Lots of people have used it around their canopy. For an alternative however that's clear instead of gray, search the archives for "Lexel". Randall Henderson, RV-6 N6R (~300 hrs) Portland, OR www.vanshomewing.org ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 08, 2001
From: Kevin Horton <khorton(at)cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: rv-4 gascolator
> >I'm switching over to an "IO-320" (converted by Ly-Con) will my current >gascolator work? What kind of pressures will I be running with my Bendix >fuel injection unit? What happens when one or two injectors get plugged? I >was told that the pressures will double, then quad-druple, is that true? > > Chuck Chuck, The gascolator should be installed before the engine driven pump, so I don't think any potential pressure increase from plugged injectors is an issue. If the electric pump is running when the injector gets plugged, the pressure relief valve on the pump should prevent any increase in pressure in the plumbing between the electric pump and the engine driven pump. If the gascolator is installed between the electric pump and the engine driven pump (most installations are like this), it must be able to handle the pressure put out by the electric pump. This is probably higher than the design pressure for gascolators that were designed with carburetors in mind. So, I think you'll want to get either an Andair gascolator, or find one used on a type certified aircraft with Bendix fuel injection. If you use one from a type certified aircraft, study the installation to see what pressures the gascolator is subjected to (i.e. is it installed before or after the electric pump). Take care, ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Nellis" <mnellis(at)peoplepc.com>
Subject: QB Shipping Containter in chicago area
Date: Nov 08, 2001
Can someone tell me how Vans ships the QB wings? Are they both in the same container? How are they secured? Would anyone in the Chicago area happen to have a reusable QB wing shipping container? I'm getting ready to move to Austin, TX and I'm finding that building a crate to ship the Wings in is going to be a lot of work and if I can entice someone to give up some materials for re-use, that would be even better. Thanks, Mike ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 08, 2001
From: "Boyd C. Braem" <bcbraem(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: rv-4 gascolator
Chuck-- My "normal" Bendix/RSA FI fuel pressure is 23 psi (21 - 25) but I've seen a low of 19 and a high of 27 with no complaint from the engine. Twice, while climbing (2,000 fpm/120 kts) in cold air, I've had the fuel pressure drop below 17--turning on the boost pump for a few seconds "cured" the "problem", if any, as I have no explanation for the pressure drop. Any one??? There is argument about the gascolator location in a FI system. Some say if you put the gascolator before the boost and engine pumps, the suction can cause bubbles and vapor in the fuel lines. Others say that if you put the gascolator between the boost and engine pump, the push pressure from the boost pump can dislodge debris/water that had nicely settled out. Personally, I'm not convinced that a gascolator serves any real purpose in a RV, even tho I still have mine mounted low on the firewall--but every year I make plans to take it out. Someday... If you do have an injector plugged, you will see some increase in pressure and the fuel computer will translate this as increased fuel consumption. But as Mr. Horton noted, the relief valve in the boost pump circuit will prevent any Oh! Oh! pressures. To keep yout injectors clean, run some Marvel Mystery Oil (I know, I know!) in your tanks every once in a while (and, maybe some TCP) and at each annual soak them in "Hoppe's #9 Gun Cleaning Solvent" and blow em out with compressed air. Boyd RV-Super 6 Chuck Rabaut wrote: > > --> RV4-List message posted by: "Chuck Rabaut" > > I'm switching over to an "IO-320" (converted by Ly-Con) will my current > gascolator work? What kind of pressures will I be running with my Bendix > fuel injection unit? What happens when one or two injectors get plugged? I > was told that the pressures will double, then quad-druple, is that true? > > Chuck > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WFACT01(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 08, 2001
Subject: Re: Sigmatek Vacumn Pump fittings
Hi-JEGS PHONE 1-800-3454545 PN720-2968-3/8NPT,1/2HOSE BARB=$10.99=HI FLOW FUEL FITTINGS -REGARDS TOM Thomas M. Whelan Whelan Farms Airport Post Office Box 426 249 Hard Hill Road North Bethlehem, CT 06751 PH 203-266-5300 FAX 203-266-5140 e-mail wfact01(at)aol.com EAA Chapter 1097, President RV-8 IO-540 LYC ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 08, 2001
From: Bill VonDane <bvondane(at)cso.atmel.com>
Subject: Help
"Rv8list@Egroups" Is there anyone in New York that can help me find out if this place exists, and if so, how I can get hold of somebody there... PETER WILLIAMS ENTERPRISES 35 CROSBY ST #100B NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10013-2635 Extensive Internet searches have turned up nothing... Thanks!! -Bill ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Wheeler North <wnorth(at)sdccd.cc.ca.us>
Subject: RE: RV-List Digest: 52 Msgs - 11/07/01
Date: Nov 08, 2001
Well, .14 mf capcitor didn't alter the amp gauge behavior one iota, at any location. any other ideas? W ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Thomas Rupe <trupe(at)ridgenet.net>
Subject: pro-seal-gascolator
Date: Nov 08, 2001
Speaking of pro seal, I would use RTV on the canopy, easier to apply. I too would like to get rid of my gascolater, anybody flying without one? On a normally aspirated engine that is. Tom Rupe S/N 62 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jerry walker" <carrabellefl(at)hotmail.com>
dc8mac(at)cs.com, AZEMB(at)aol.com, royce111(at)gtcom.net, evantsay(at)itri.org.tw, fourengines(at)yahoo.com, gdudley(at)holli.com, gustin(at)tabletoptelephone.com, jenniferlmercier(at)hotmail.com, kipilot(at)teleport.com, KT4AL(at)worldnet.att.net, mluthi(at)compuserve.com, m_glanton(at)yahoo.com, tomnmoma(at)cs.com, just4labor(at)aol.com, chestnutrose(at)gulf.net, NTFLIESFR8(at)aol.com, patrickd(at)milberg.com, support(at)vansaircraft.com, rv-list(at)matronics.com, Stingvet64(at)aol.com, samandwez(at)cs.com, maxzerba(at)hotmail.com, simdude(at)worldnet.att.net, squawk177(at)yahoo.com, ssharff(at)earthlink.net, Stakmac(at)aol.com, YEOCHRIE(at)worldnet.att.net, shaio.zerba(at)ramstein.af.mil
Date: Nov 08, 2001
Read this folks >-----Original Message----- >From: McCleskey, Maurice >Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 2:02 PM >To: 'guccione(at)EagleGL.com' >Cc: Choate, Lisa M; Rocha, Jimmy; Thomas, Leo >Subject: FW: Chili cookoff > > > >Notes From An Inexperienced Chili Taster Named FRANK, who was visiting >Texas from the East Coast: >Recently I was honored to be selected as a judge at a chili cook-off. The >original person called in sick at the last moment and I happened to be >standing there at the judge's table asking directions to the beer wagon >when the call came. I was assured by the other two judges (NativeTexans) >that the chili wouldn't be all that spicy, and besides, they told me I >could have free beer during the tasting, so I accepted. Here are the >scorecards from the event: > > > >Chili # 1: Mike's Maniac Mobster Monster Chili > > JUDGE ONE: A little too heavy on tomato. Amusing kick. > > JUDGE TWO: Nice, smooth tomato flavor. Very mild. > FRANK: Holy shit, what the hell is this stuff? You could remove dried >paint from your driveway. Took me two beers to put the flames out. I hope >that's the worst one. These Texans are crazy. > > > > >Chili # 2: Arthur's Afterburner Chili > >JUDGE ONE: Smoky, with a hint of pork. Slight Jalapeno tang. > > JUDGE TWO: Exciting BBQ flavor, needs more peppers to be taken >seriously. > > FRANK: Keep this out of reach of children! I'm not sure what I am >supposed to taste besides pain. I had to wave off two people who wanted to >give me the Heimlich maneuver. They had to rush in more beer when they saw >the look on my face. > > > >Chili # 3: Fred's Famous Burn Down the Barn Chili > > JUDGE ONE: Excellent firehouse chili! Great kick. Needs more beans. > > JUDGE TWO: A beanless chili, a bit salty, good use of red peppers. > > FRANK: Call the EPA, I've located a uranium spill. My nose feels like I >have been snorting Drano. Everyone knows the routine by now, get me more >beer before I ignite. The Barmaid pounded me on the back; now my backbone >is in the front part of my chest. I'm getting shit-faced from all the >beer. > > > >Chili # 4: Bubba's Black Magic > >JUDGE ONE: Black bean chili with almost no spice. Disappointing. > > JUDGE TWO: Hint of lime in the black beans. Good side dish for fish or > >other mild foods, not much of a chili. > >FRANK: I felt something scraping across my tongue, but was unable to >taste it, is it possible to burn-out taste buds? Sally, the barmaid, was >standing behind me with fresh refills; that 300 lb. bitch is starting to >look HOT, just like this nuclear waste I'm eating. Is chili an >aphrodisiac? > > > >Chili # 5: Linda's Legal Lip Remover > > JUDGE ONE: Meaty, strong chili. Cayenne peppers freshly ground, adding >considerable kick. Very impressive. > >JUDGE TWO: Chili using shredded beef; could use more tomato. Must admit >the cayenne peppers make a strong statement. > >>FRANK: My ears are ringing, sweat is pouring off my forehead and I can >no longer focus my eyes. I farted and four people behind me needed >paramedics. > > > >The contestant seemed offended when I told her that her chili had given >me brain damage. Sally saved my tongue from bleeding by pouring beer >directly on it from a pitcher. I wonder if I'm burning my lips off? It >really pisses me off that the other judges asked me to stop screaming. >Screw those rednecks! > > > > >Chili # 6: Vera's Very Vegetarian Variety > > >JUDGE ONE: Thin yet bold vegetarian variety chili. Good balance of >spice and peppers. > > >JUDGE TWO: The best yet. Aggressive use of peppers, onions, and garlic. >Superb. > > >FRANK: My intestines are now a straight pipe filled with gaseous, >Sulfuric flames. I shit myself when I farted and I'm worried it will eat >through the chair. No one seems inclined to stand behind me except that >slut Sally, she must be kinkier than I thought. Can't feel my lips >anymore. I need to wipe my ass with a snow cone! > > > >Chili # 7: Susan's Screaming Sensation Chili > > JUDGE ONE: A mediocre chili with too much reliance on canned peppers. > > JUDGE TWO: Ho Hum, tastes as if the chef literally threw in a can of >chili peppers at the last moment. I should note that I am worried about >Judge Number 3. He appears to be in a bit of distress as he is cursing >uncontrollably. > > > >FRANK: You could put a grenade in my mouth, pull the pin, and I wouldn't >feel a damn thing. I've lost the sight in one eye, and the world sounds >like it is made of rushing water. My shirt is covered with chili which >slid unnoticed out of my mouth. My pants are full of lava-like shit to >match my damn shirt. At least during the autopsy they'll know what killed >me. > > > >I've decided to stop breathing, it's too painful. Screw it, I'm not >getting any oxygen anyway. If I need air, I'll just suck it in through the >4-inch hole in my stomach. > > > >Chili # 8: Helen's Mount Saint Chili > > JUDGE ONE: A perfect ending, this is a nice blend chili, safe for all, >not too bold but spicy enough to declare its existence. > >JUDGE TWO: This final entry is a good, balanced chili, neither mild nor >hot. > > Sorry to see that most of it was lost when Judge Number 3 passed out, >fell over and pulled the chili pot down on top of himself. Not sure if >he's going to make it. Poor Yank, wonder how he'd have reacted to a really >hot chili? > > > >FRANK: --------------(editor's note: Judge #3 was unable to report > > >Christine M. Landry > >Inventory Analyst >Baker Hughes Inteq >2001 Rankin Rd. >Houston, Tx. > >(713)-625-4269 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 08, 2001
From: Roger Embree <rembree(at)sympatico.ca>
Subject: Re: rv-4 gascolator
Garry LeGare wrote > Dave, I have done extensive long term testing with paper element filters. I > have talked to Wix filter engineers. Their findings are that their filters do > not stop water flowing thru them, nor do they stop gas flowing thru them, when > the element is saturated with water. My testing with Wix and Fram filters agree > with them. However, I wouldn't fly with any other brands as they may stop the > flow of gas when their element becomes saturated with water. > Many years ago on a warm winter day, my partner and I flew from Alberta to Saskatchewan to pick up a Cessna 140 for someone. It had been sitting for a long time so when I filled the fuel tanks I checked for water and drained thoroughly. Late in the day we took off for Edmonton but it got dark and the temperature was starting to plummet so we landed safely in Camrose for the night. By the next morning the temperature had fallen to about -20 Centigrade. I could get no fuel to flow from the gascolator. The C-140 has an excellent gravity fuel system but there was enough water in the lines to freeze. It took a couple of hours in a heated hangar to thaw things out and get the rest of the water out. In my own 140, I have seen ice crystals in gas taken both from the wing tanks and the gascolator more than once. Would that pass through a paper filter? Stranded motorists in northern Alberta with frozen fuel filters was not uncommon before alcohol was added to auto fuel. Gary, did you testing include putting your filters in the freezer? In hindsight, I was lucky my fuel lines froze while I was on the ground. With no alcohol in avgas I will stick with a gascolator. Roger Embree 6A fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6bldr(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Sigmatek Vacumn Pump fittings
Date: Nov 09, 2001
The design is right...but I need the barb for 5/8" hose. Darn! The price on these is closer to reality! Thanks, Jerry Calvert Edmond Ok -6 ----- Original Message ----- From: <WFACT01(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: Sigmatek Vacumn Pump fittings > > Hi-JEGS PHONE 1-800-3454545 PN720-2968-3/8NPT,1/2HOSE BARB=$10.99=HI FLOW > FUEL FITTINGS -REGARDS TOM > > Thomas M. Whelan > > Whelan Farms Airport > Post Office Box 426 > 249 Hard Hill Road North > Bethlehem, CT 06751 > > PH 203-266-5300 > FAX 203-266-5140 > e-mail wfact01(at)aol.com > > EAA Chapter 1097, President > RV-8 IO-540 LYC > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Curt Reimer" <cgreimer(at)mb.sympatico.ca>
Subject: Re: Parts for Sale
Date: Nov 08, 2001
All parts sold. Thanks. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Curt Reimer" <cgreimer(at)mb.sympatico.ca> Subject: RV-List: Parts for Sale > > I have a few spare parts for sale: > > Electric Elevator Trim Kit. Unused, in box. Purchased around 1995. This is > the model with the electric gauge for trim position, not the lights. I went > with manual trim. $120 > > Throttle cable, friction type, standard RV-6 length designed to be used with > the centre console. The plastic coating is chafed a bit from rubbing on the > firewall during test fittings but otherwise its new and unused. I mounted my > controls on the panel itself and needed longer cables. > $25 > > Mixture cable, vernier type, same condition. $25 > > Curt > cgreimer(at)mb.sympatico.ca > 204 958 2859 eve. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dan Checkoway" <dan(at)rvproject.com>
Subject: Re: Help
Date: Nov 08, 2001
http://yp.yahoo.com/py/ypMap.py?Pyt=Typ&tuid=1079458&ck=1465942239 Listed in the Yahoo yellowpages as "Williams, Peter W - Rogers & Wells", which looks like a law firm. Don't know if that's what you're looking for. )_( Dan dan(at)rvproject.com http://www.rvproject.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill VonDane" <bvondane(at)cso.atmel.com> "Rv8list@Egroups" Subject: RV-List: Help > > Is there anyone in New York that can help me find out if this place > exists, and if so, how I can get hold of somebody there... > > PETER WILLIAMS ENTERPRISES > 35 CROSBY ST #100B > NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10013-2635 > > Extensive Internet searches have turned up nothing... > > Thanks!! > > -Bill > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 08, 2001
From: Jaye and Scott Jackson <jayeandscott(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: Looking for a presure switch
To all of you who have replied to my post: thanks so much. Now I know I'm not looking for something that doesn't exist.... Scott in Vancouver ----- Original Message ----- From: "Meketa" <acgm(at)gvtc.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: Looking for a presure switch > > Scott > > There is a pressure switch close to what you are asking for. > > 1/8"-27 Dryseal thread > term."P"-"S" NC,opens at 1.0 psi > term "P"-"I" NO, closes at 2.5 - 8.0 psi > Standard Ignition Part Number PS-64 > GM Part Number 3986857 > > This is the longer style, similar to the old small block Chevy single wire > switches. > There is another switch which is shorter, but with 1/4" pipe thread and the > same > wiring configuration. Standard Ignition # PS-136, GM #1249945 or # 25500673. > > Application is 70 - 79 General Motors and Triumph Products. They are three > wire oil pressure / choke switches. I am unsure of the availability. Let me > know if you have no luck locating one. > > I would still like to know what you are using the switch for. > > George Meketa > RV8QB installing wings Saturday A.M. > > -> The local automotive shops here are unable to locate a pressure switch > for > > me. It's 1/8th NPT, NC, 0.5psi. > > Anyone know where I can get one? > > thanks, > > Scott in VAncouver > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chris Santschi" <rv8pilot(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: RV8 Orndorff Videos
Date: Nov 09, 2001
Have Orndorff videos for RV8 prepunched empannage,wings and fuselage. $100. I'll pay shipping. Contact offline at rv8pilot(at)hotmail.com Chris Santschi RV8 80881 Festus,MO. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 08, 2001
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: What Listers Are Saying - Fund Raiser Continues...
Dear Listers, The 2001 List Fund Raiser is going well and I want to thank everyone that has already so generously made a Contribution to support the Lists! Below are some of the great comments and feedback members have been including along with their Contributions. Won't you make a Contribution today to support the continued operation and upgrade of your Lists? Its fast and easy using the SSL Secure Web Site or by simply sending a personal check. Complete information can be found at Contribution web site: http://www.matronics.com/contribution A give a special Thank You to all of those that have already contributed so far this year!! Matt Dralle Email List Administrator ================== What Listers Are Saying =================== Great information site. - Edward S. This is the first thing I look at every day. - Ralph M. The new List option is WONDERFUL! - Kenyon B. ...new Search Software is absolutely fantastic!! - Bruce K. ...essential to my enjoyment of RV building and flying. - Douglas W. Great List! - Randall H. ...an invaluable service! - Carlos S. ...incredible service to the industry! - Alex M. Building wouldn't be the same without the "Great List". - Tom E. ...has helped the building process immensely. - Hap S. Matt G Dralle | Matronics | PO Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 925-606-1001 V | 925-606-6281 F | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ WWW | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 08, 2001
From: Garry LeGare <"versadek"@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: rv-4 gascolator
Roger, regarding your question, about whether ice crystals would pass through the inline filters I've tested. I can say without any doubt that they will not. The filter medium will filter out ice crystals as well as it would any large particle mater, thereby keeping the ice out of the carb, and letting the gas pass through, which is what you want. I love being able to look through the clear case of the filter and see if anything is in it, when preflighting and while flying. Also when positioned horizontally the large diameter of the filter allows water or other contaminant to settle out, just as with a conventional gascolator, except, with the see through in line filter you can see if there is water in your fuel, something you can't do with a normal gascolator installation. As far as the stranded motorists in Alberta, I'm sure that if they were trained to drain the water out of the fuel tank before every flight, as we are, they probably wouldn't accumulate enough water in the fuel to fill the filters with water in the first place, and if they had a see through in line fuel filter in the cockpit, they would be able to see the water starting to accumulate, before there was so much that it filled the filter. I believe you would have had much less trouble with water in the fuel of the 140, if you had drained the tanks prior to fueling up and then again after fueling. Your darn lucky that the water that froze in the fuel lines never made it to the carb while you were flying. As far as the fuel system goes for the 6A your building, I suggest that you talk to guys already flying., you'll find a good portion of them that have gascolators say they would leave it out next time. Have a good one and be careful out there. Garry"Casper" Roger Embree wrote: > > Garry LeGare wrote > > > Dave, I have done extensive long term testing with paper element filters. I > > have talked to Wix filter engineers. Their findings are that their filters do > > not stop water flowing thru them, nor do they stop gas flowing thru them, when > > the element is saturated with water. My testing with Wix and Fram filters agree > > with them. However, I wouldn't fly with any other brands as they may stop the > > flow of gas when their element becomes saturated with water. > > > > Many years ago on a warm winter day, my partner and I flew from Alberta to > Saskatchewan to pick up a Cessna 140 for someone. It had been sitting for a long > time so when I filled the fuel tanks I checked for water and drained thoroughly. > Late in the day we took off for Edmonton but it got dark and the temperature was > starting to plummet so we landed safely in Camrose for the night. > > By the next morning the temperature had fallen to about -20 Centigrade. I could get > no fuel to flow from the gascolator. The C-140 has an excellent gravity fuel system > but there was enough water in the lines to freeze. It took a couple of hours in a > heated hangar to thaw things out and get the rest of the water out. > > In my own 140, I have seen ice crystals in gas taken both from the wing tanks and > the gascolator more than once. Would that pass through a paper filter? Stranded > motorists in northern Alberta with frozen fuel filters was not uncommon before > alcohol was added to auto fuel. > > Gary, did you testing include putting your filters in the freezer? > > In hindsight, I was lucky my fuel lines froze while I was on the ground. With no > alcohol in avgas I will stick with a gascolator. > > Roger Embree > 6A fuselage > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randall Henderson" <randallh(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: pro-seal-gascolator
Date: Nov 08, 2001
> Speaking of pro seal, I would use RTV on the canopy, easier to apply. Not a good idea. You don't want that stuff near your plexiglass -- it will promote crazing. Not to mention that its not paintable so you don't want it on any skirt edges that you're going to paint. Randall Henderson, RV-6 N6R (~300 hrs) Portland, OR www.vanshomewing.org ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Charles Rowbotham" <crowbotham(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: pro-seal-attach canopy
Date: Nov 09, 2001
Randall, Is right. To make the installation much less messy - use the semiweld (proseal) in the tubes (self mixing) - you'll the appropriate caulking gun to use them. If you have a contact in an auto body shop they will probably have one to borrow or rent. They cost about $70 to buy. Then you apply it just like regular caulking - just take you r time and it will come out great and it easy to paint. Took dave about 15 minutes. Chuck & Dave Rowbotham RV-8A (25 hrs flown off) Niantic, CT (Westerly airport) >From: "Randall Henderson" <randallh(at)home.com> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: Re: RV-List: pro-seal-gascolator >Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 23:55:21 -0800 > > > > Speaking of pro seal, I would use RTV on the canopy, easier to apply. > >Not a good idea. You don't want that stuff near your plexiglass -- it will >promote crazing. Not to mention that its not paintable so you don't want it >on any skirt edges that you're going to paint. > >Randall Henderson, RV-6 N6R (~300 hrs) >Portland, OR >www.vanshomewing.org > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 09, 2001
From: Miller Robert <rmiller3(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: 66AP 40 hour report - long
May I ask... what is "RTV"? Thanks. Robert Alex Peterson wrote: > I went through the engine area, and put blobs of RTV everwhere it looked > > liked something might be chafing, or thinking about it. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Wheeler North <wnorth(at)sdccd.cc.ca.us>
Subject: Amp gauge
Date: Nov 09, 2001
Folks, tried the a .147mf cap on the amp gauge, on the shunt and it had no effect. I have a fluke 99 scope so I'll try to get a few pics of the pwr/gnd circuit during xmit this weekend. I'm on the rv digest so send me an email if you want me to forward the pics to you direct. Any particular frequency/time range I should be looking for? thx W ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 09, 2001
From: Ken Balch <kbalch1(at)mediaone.net>
Subject: Re: 66AP 40 hour report - long
RTV (stands for room temperature vulcanizing, which is perfectly descriptive) comes in tubes as a rubbery gel and cures into a flexible rubber condition. It comes in both regular (clear) and high-temp (red) varieties and is useful for sealing small holes, cementing parts in place, etc. Great stuff... Ken Miller Robert wrote: > > May I ask... what is "RTV"? > Thanks. > Robert > > Alex Peterson wrote: > > > I went through the engine area, and put blobs of RTV everwhere it looked > > > liked something might be chafing, or thinking about it. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Textor" <jack(at)IaJobs.com>
Subject: Wing top skin riveting sequence??
Date: Nov 09, 2001
Morning Listers, On my RV8 wing, I have the outboard leading edge riveted to the spar. Would it be best to install the tank with bolts and screws before riveting the top skins? Also should I use LocTite on the an3 bolts for the tank through the spar to z brackets? PLEASE NOTE NEW WEB AND EMAIL www.iaJobs.com jack(at)iaJobs.com Jack Textor PERSONNEL INCORPORATED 604 Locust, Suite 516 Des Moines, IA 50309 515-243-7687 phone 515-243-3350 fax PLACEMENTS / OUTPLACEMENTS TESTING / TEMPORARY STAFFING ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 09, 2001
From: "William G. MacIntyre" <macintyr(at)vims.edu>
Subject: Re: 66AP 40 hour report - long
RTV = Room Temperature Vulcanizing ... generally a silicone rubber compound. > >May I ask... what is "RTV"? >Thanks. >Robert > >Alex Peterson wrote: > > > I went through the engine area, and put blobs of RTV everwhere it looked > > > liked something might be chafing, or thinking about it. > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 09, 2001
From: Al Mojzisik <prober(at)iwaynet.net>
Subject: GARVEY ADDRESSES PILOTS IN 'NEW WORLD'
==> RESTORING GA <= GARVEY ADDRESSES PILOTS IN 'NEW WORLD' FAA Administrator Jane Garvey addressed the RV-List membership for the first time in as many years Thursday morning, but this year her tone was serious, underscoring the "new world" that we now live in after September 11. "You are not the security risk," she told the packed opening general session at Matt Dralle's shop in Livermore, California via a satellite feed from a Port-A-Potty in Washington, D.C. Instead, she said the security concern is that some of your home-built planes could fall apart in the sky and hit someone on the head. "A plane flying overhead is no longer cause for wonder but a cause to wonder if it will stay together!", she added. She also said that the FAA has been doing everything it can to return all of aviation back to normal. It is re-scheduling ramp checks and many of the other pilot harassing techniques used in the past. She said that they will soon resume first through third class medical rejections for anyone with Mohammad anywhere in there name. "This should keep our sky's safe until they can get new ID's made up and new student visa's", She added. Garvey also pointed out the fact that they "would have to apply for new licenses and medical approvals with there new names and that will take at least three to five years for us to process in our usual time frame". Garvey said that the FAA was getting ready to resume normal Class B operations early last week when the effort was stymied by the NOTAM regarding flight near nuclear sites. She also said that all pilots recognize that the FAA has never been a Class "A" operation so return to Class "B" operations would be about normal. Garvey credited Matt Dralle for his efforts in getting information to RV-Listers and the use of his lists to be sure that these pesky home-brewed airplanes are built correctly through information sharing by builders helping builders. "Never has there been a time when communication between the FAA and the RV-List been more important," Garvey said. RV-List Administrator Matt Dralle presented Mike Robertson, FAA associate administrator of "Cutting through the BS" and former head of Hawaii's RV-list contingent and technical affairs division, with an Administrative Citation for his "unwavering dedication" and support of the RV-List. Robertson built and flew an RV-8 that remains trapped in Hawaii's temporary flight restriction area otherwise known as "My partner wouldn't let me take the plane to the mainland", Class "$" airspace. Garvy also encouraged all RV-List members present at the meeting to contribute to the RV-List fund-raiser. This is obviously why we have had such great (NOT) participation of only 6% almost one third into the monthly drive. So let's listen to our administrator get those contributions in! Please take a moment to support your Lists by making a Secure Credit Card Contribution at the following web site: http://www.matronics.com/contribution Or you may send a personal check to: Matronics Email Lists c/o Matt Dralle PO Box 347 Livermore CA 94551-0347 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chuck Rabaut" <crabaut(at)coalinga.com>
Subject: Re: rv-4 gascolator
Date: Nov 09, 2001
Kevin, Thanks, that's just the type info I was looking for. Chuck ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chuck Rabaut" <crabaut(at)coalinga.com>
Subject: rv-4 gascolator
Date: Nov 09, 2001
Boyd, Thank you for your input. I'm going to keep my gascolator in-line between the boost and engine pumps, we'll see how that works out. Chuck ----- Original Message ----- From: Boyd C. Braem <bcbraem(at)home.com> Subject: Re: RV4-List: Fw: RV-List: rv-4 gascolator > --> RV4-List message posted by: "Boyd C. Braem" > > Chuck-- > > My "normal" Bendix/RSA FI fuel pressure is 23 psi (21 - 25) but I've > seen a low of 19 and a high of 27 with no complaint from the engine. > Twice, while climbing (2,000 fpm/120 kts) in cold air, I've had the fuel > pressure drop below 17--turning on the boost pump for a few seconds > "cured" the "problem", if any, as I have no explanation for the pressure > drop. Any one??? > > There is argument about the gascolator location in a FI system. Some > say if you put the gascolator before the boost and engine pumps, the > suction can cause bubbles and vapor in the fuel lines. Others say that > if you put the gascolator between the boost and engine pump, the push > pressure from the boost pump can dislodge debris/water that had nicely > settled out. Personally, I'm not convinced that a gascolator serves any > real purpose in a RV, even tho I still have mine mounted low on the > firewall--but every year I make plans to take it out. Someday... > > If you do have an injector plugged, you will see some increase in > pressure and the fuel computer will translate this as increased fuel > consumption. But as Mr. Horton noted, the relief valve in the boost > pump circuit will prevent any Oh! Oh! pressures. > > To keep yout injectors clean, run some Marvel Mystery Oil (I know, I > know!) in your tanks every once in a while (and, maybe some TCP) and at > each annual soak them in "Hoppe's #9 Gun Cleaning Solvent" and blow em > out with compressed air. > > Boyd > RV-Super 6 > > > Chuck Rabaut wrote: > > > > --> RV4-List message posted by: "Chuck Rabaut" > > > > I'm switching over to an "IO-320" (converted by Ly-Con) will my current > > gascolator work? What kind of pressures will I be running with my Bendix > > fuel injection unit? What happens when one or two injectors get plugged? I > > was told that the pressures will double, then quad-druple, is that true? > > > > Chuck > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chuck Rabaut" <crabaut(at)coalinga.com>
Subject: pro-seal-attach canopy
Date: Nov 09, 2001
How long does it take for pro-seal (this time I used a generic "Flame Master" from Aircraft Spruce) to dry?? 3-4 days or did I mix it wrong again. The last time I just left the tanks for several weeks whilst I went on with my life & other parts. Chuck ----- Original Message ----- From: Charles Rowbotham <crowbotham(at)hotmail.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: pro-seal-attach canopy > > > Randall, > > Is right. > > To make the installation much less messy - use the semiweld (proseal) in the > tubes (self mixing) - you'll the appropriate caulking gun to use them. If > you have a contact in an auto body shop they will probably have one to > borrow or rent. They cost about $70 to buy. > > Then you apply it just like regular caulking - just take you r time and it > will come out great and it easy to paint. Took dave about 15 minutes. > > Chuck & Dave Rowbotham > RV-8A (25 hrs flown off) > Niantic, CT (Westerly airport) > > > >From: "Randall Henderson" <randallh(at)home.com> > >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > >To: > >Subject: Re: RV-List: pro-seal-gascolator > >Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 23:55:21 -0800 > > > > > > > Speaking of pro seal, I would use RTV on the canopy, easier to apply. > > > >Not a good idea. You don't want that stuff near your plexiglass -- it will > >promote crazing. Not to mention that its not paintable so you don't want it > >on any skirt edges that you're going to paint. > > > >Randall Henderson, RV-6 N6R (~300 hrs) > >Portland, OR > >www.vanshomewing.org > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stephen Johnson" <spjohnsn(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Wing top skin riveting sequence??
Date: Nov 09, 2001
Jack, That's the way I did it. Increased stiffness and assurance that you maintain the butt joint interface between the tank and the skins. No LocTite on any bolts. The platenuts have an elliptical hole which holds the bolts. Steve Johnson RV-8 Finishing right wing, fuse ready to go ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack Textor" <jack(at)IaJobs.com> Subject: RV-List: Wing top skin riveting sequence?? > > Morning Listers, > On my RV8 wing, I have the outboard leading edge riveted to the spar. Would > it be best to install the tank with bolts and screws before riveting the top > skins? Also should I use LocTite on the an3 bolts for the tank through the > spar to z brackets? > > > PLEASE NOTE NEW WEB AND EMAIL > www.iaJobs.com > jack(at)iaJobs.com > > Jack Textor > PERSONNEL INCORPORATED > 604 Locust, Suite 516 > Des Moines, IA 50309 > 515-243-7687 phone > 515-243-3350 fax > > PLACEMENTS / OUTPLACEMENTS > TESTING / TEMPORARY STAFFING > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 09, 2001
From: Bill VonDane <bvondane(at)cso.atmel.com>
Subject: Engine Control Cables...
"Rv8list@Egroups" Hi all... I just installed the engine control cables in my -8A last night and have posted some new pix to my site. I also have new pix of the Vetterman exhaust installation, and you can see the filtered air box pix too... One note on the cables... I have an O320-E3D, so I bought the 55" cables from Van's... They fit, barely... My advice is get the 60" cables at least... The extra 5" would have been welcome... I think, depending on how you wanted to route the cables, the 67" wouldn't be terrible... IMHO... Later... -Bill VonDane Colorado Springs, CO RV-8A - N8VD http://vondane.com/rv8a/ mailto:bill(at)vondane.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 09, 2001
Subject: Re: Gear leg fairings
From: Don Diehl <diehldon(at)home.com>
> From: Gary Graham <beeb(at)teleport.com> > Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 12:16:30 -0800 > To: RV List > Subject: RV-List: Gear leg fairings > > I am interested in some tips on gear leg and > intersection fairings. I am in the process of fitting Van's fiberglass > fairings to my short gear RV-4 and could use some advice regarding a > faring/gear interface that has proven to maintain alignment and has survived > many hours of operations. I have over 100 happy hours with my Van's fiberglass gear leg fairings on my RV-4. About 40% of my landings are on a grass (bumpy) field. I cut a template to match the curve of the fairings, fastened it to a stick that I could align with the aircraft centerline then marked spots on the fuselage at the trailing ends of the fairings. At those spots I pop riveted 0.032 aluminum L-brackets. Drilled through the brackets and fairings for a #8 stainless machine screw. The fairings are not clamped to the gear legs nor do the gear legs have the wood dampers. This induced a half-ball yaw so my alignment was not perfect. Using stainless #10 fender (wide area) washers, I shimmed between the L-brackets and the fairings to eliminate the yaw. The installation really is much simpler than the above description. Contact me off the list at if you need details. I'm the third owner of this RV-4 and have extensively rebuilt it. The log says it has the long gear legs. Can anyone tell me the differences between long and short legs and their installation requirements? Many thanks to Matt and all of you for this most informative site. Don Diehl, N28EW Bremerton WA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Weiler" <doug.weiler(at)pressenter.com>
Subject: Oil out breather
Date: Nov 09, 2001
Fellow Listers: My flying RV-4 has an AEIO-360 with a Christen inverted oil system. The builder ran a tube for the breather line all the way back to a point just forward of the tailwheel. Last week, after an hour flight, I suddenly noticed the tailwheel was covered with oil directly in back of the breather outlet. I didn't think too much about it since sometimes, a oily/water mixture will work it's way through the tube and come out. This has only happened a couple times in the 110 hours I have owned the airplane. I disconnected this long breather line and installed a short breather tube that the builder had used in the winter. This provides a "normal" breather outlet at the base of the cowl in case the long tube would freeze up in winter. But today I flew the airplane for just 20 minutes and again the tailwheel was covered in oil again. There was indications that oil was coming out the breather line at the base of the cowl. Also, the oil level has gone down about 1/2 qt in the last 2 or 3 hours (this airplane has never used more than 1 quart in 15 hours). It is 600 hours since new. It runs perfect and the engine analyzer indicates normal operation. Any ideas why oil is now coming out the breather before I call my mechanic? Thanks ================ Doug Weiler Hudson, WI 715-386-1239 dougweil(at)pressenter.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Weiler" <doug.weiler(at)pressenter.com>
Subject: Re: Gear leg fairings
Date: Nov 09, 2001
>> I'm the third owner of this RV-4 and have extensively rebuilt it. The log > says it has the long gear legs. Can anyone tell me the differences between > long and short legs and their installation requirements? > > You would definitely know the difference between short and long legs as the long legs position the nose 4 inches higher. A long-geared RV-4 almost looks like a RV-8 at quick glance. ================ Doug Weiler Hudson, WI 715-386-1239 dougweil(at)pressenter.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 09, 2001
From: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Oil out breather
Doug Weiler wrote: > > > Fellow Listers: > > My flying RV-4 has an AEIO-360 with a Christen inverted oil system. The > builder ran a tube for the breather line all the way back to a point just > forward of the tailwheel. > > Last week, after an hour flight, I suddenly noticed the tailwheel was > covered with oil directly in back of the breather outlet. I didn't think > too much about it since sometimes, a oily/water mixture will work it's way > through the tube and come out. This has only happened a couple times in the > 110 hours I have owned the airplane. > > I disconnected this long breather line and installed a short breather tube > that the builder had used in the winter. This provides a "normal" breather > outlet at the base of the cowl in case the long tube would freeze up in > winter. But today I flew the airplane for just 20 minutes and again the > tailwheel was covered in oil again. There was indications that oil was > coming out the breather line at the base of the cowl. Also, the oil level > has gone down about 1/2 qt in the last 2 or 3 hours (this airplane has never > used more than 1 quart in 15 hours). It is 600 hours since new. It runs > perfect and the engine analyzer indicates normal operation. > > Any ideas why oil is now coming out the breather before I call my mechanic? > > Thanks > > ================ > Doug Weiler I had a problem one time where the breather line was just at a spot where the oil was being siphoned out of the line. After shortening the oil breather line the problem went away. Jerry Springer ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 09, 2001
From: kenneth beene <kbeene(at)citilink.com>
Subject: Re: Gear leg fairings
Don Diehl wrote: > I'm the third owner of this RV-4 and have extensively rebuilt it. The log > says it has the long gear legs. Can anyone tell me the differences between > long and short legs and their installation requirements? > The short legs are part # U-401 and measure 48" from top to end of axle thread - measured around the bend. The long legs are part # U-415 and measure 50.5". Ken http://www.mninter.net/~kbeene/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 09, 2001
From: Jaye and Scott Jackson <jayeandscott(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: Oil out breather
Maybe post this question on the aerobatic list? Scott in Vancouver ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Weiler" <doug.weiler(at)pressenter.com> Subject: RV-List: Oil out breather > > Fellow Listers: > > My flying RV-4 has an AEIO-360 with a Christen inverted oil system. The > builder ran a tube for the breather line all the way back to a point just > forward of the tailwheel. > > Last week, after an hour flight, I suddenly noticed the tailwheel was > covered with oil directly in back of the breather outlet. I didn't think > too much about it since sometimes, a oily/water mixture will work it's way > through the tube and come out. This has only happened a couple times in the > 110 hours I have owned the airplane. > > I disconnected this long breather line and installed a short breather tube > that the builder had used in the winter. This provides a "normal" breather > outlet at the base of the cowl in case the long tube would freeze up in > winter. But today I flew the airplane for just 20 minutes and again the > tailwheel was covered in oil again. There was indications that oil was > coming out the breather line at the base of the cowl. Also, the oil level > has gone down about 1/2 qt in the last 2 or 3 hours (this airplane has never > used more than 1 quart in 15 hours). It is 600 hours since new. It runs > perfect and the engine analyzer indicates normal operation. > > Any ideas why oil is now coming out the breather before I call my mechanic? > > Thanks > > ================ > Doug Weiler > Hudson, WI > 715-386-1239 > dougweil(at)pressenter.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ted Fields" <tbird(at)ptsi.net>
Subject: RV6 A
Date: Nov 09, 2001
I Have just bought a RV6 A with a Buick V8 engine. It has a handle on the instrument panel. When the handle is turned it releases some vacuum and the manifold press goes down. Can any one tell me the purpose of this valve Ted Fields Guymon OK. N8706D & N4344X Expermintal ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ross A. Scroggs" <rscroggs(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Oil out breather
Date: Nov 09, 2001
Doug, Usually when oil starts to weep out of the crankcase breather it means that the internal crankcase pressure has increased. This is caused by cylinder ring blowby. Do a good compression check. This will show which cylinder it is. It could also be caused by having an oil separator, in line with the breather tube, that is plugged up and not allowing oil to flow back into the engine. Good luck, Ross Scroggs Conyers, Ga. RV-4 Emp. ----- Original Message ----- From: Doug Weiler <doug.weiler(at)pressenter.com> Subject: RV-List: Oil out breather > > Fellow Listers: > > My flying RV-4 has an AEIO-360 with a Christen inverted oil system. The > builder ran a tube for the breather line all the way back to a point just > forward of the tailwheel. > > Last week, after an hour flight, I suddenly noticed the tailwheel was > covered with oil directly in back of the breather outlet. I didn't think > too much about it since sometimes, a oily/water mixture will work it's way > through the tube and come out. This has only happened a couple times in the > 110 hours I have owned the airplane. > > I disconnected this long breather line and installed a short breather tube > that the builder had used in the winter. This provides a "normal" breather > outlet at the base of the cowl in case the long tube would freeze up in > winter. But today I flew the airplane for just 20 minutes and again the > tailwheel was covered in oil again. There was indications that oil was > coming out the breather line at the base of the cowl. Also, the oil level > has gone down about 1/2 qt in the last 2 or 3 hours (this airplane has never > used more than 1 quart in 15 hours). It is 600 hours since new. It runs > perfect and the engine analyzer indicates normal operation. > > Any ideas why oil is now coming out the breather before I call my mechanic? > > Thanks > > ================ > Doug Weiler > Hudson, WI > 715-386-1239 > dougweil(at)pressenter.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug's Mail" <dougr(at)petroblend.com>
Subject: Re: RV6 A
Date: Nov 09, 2001
Ted, If this is a small valve, it is call a manifold pressure drain. Sometimes fuel or water will accumulate in the manifold pressure lines. If you open that valve with the throttle at idle, it will suck all the fuel and water out of those lines into the engine. That would be a Runup item on your checklist. Tailwinds Doug Rozendaal ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ted Fields" <tbird(at)ptsi.net> Subject: RV-List: RV6 A > > I Have just bought a RV6 A with a Buick V8 engine. It has a handle on the > instrument panel. When the handle is turned it releases some vacuum and the > manifold press goes down. Can any one tell me the purpose of this valve > Ted Fields > Guymon OK. > N8706D & N4344X Expermintal > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Alex Peterson" <alexpeterson(at)usjet.net>
Subject: Re: Oil out breather
Date: Nov 09, 2001
> > Any ideas why oil is now coming out the breather before I call my mechanic? > > Thanks > > ================ > Doug Weiler > Hudson, WI > 715-386-1239 Doug, it could be that the line which returns oil from the separator to the sump is clogged, and your separator is finally full of oil. This line becomes the breather line when inverted. Alex Peterson Maple Grove, MN 6A N66AP flying 40 hours ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randall Henderson" <randallh(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: pro-seal-attach canopy
Date: Nov 09, 2001
I said [regarding RTV]: > Not a good idea. You don't want that stuff near your plexiglass -- it will > promote crazing. I think I have to retract that -- someone questioned me about it offline and frankly I couldn't remember where I got the idea it would craze, so I went back and looked at the archives and it appears that a lot of people have used RTV on their canopy with no ill effects. If someone has had problems hopefully they will speak up, but I can't honestly say I have direct knowledge either way. I do stand by my recommendation to use Lexel or Proseal however -- since both are paintable unlike silicone based RTVs you don't risk contamination/fisheyes etc. on adjacent aluminum surfaces. Randall Henderson, RV-6 N6R (~300 hrs) Portland, OR www.vanshomewing.org ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom & Cathy Ervin" <tcervin(at)valkyrie.net>
Subject: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment
Date: Nov 10, 2001
List: I am fitting the upper cowl and was wondering when ready to rivet the Forward Top Skin (F-6106) how did other builders drill & rivet the edge that meets the fuselage on both sides? My kit is a QB and the holes are drilled and dimpled already about 18 in. back on both sides of the upper fuselage skin. Do I finish riveting the fuselage skin first, or are both skins drilled to match and riveted together? Even with cargo straps the F-6106 skin is going to be tough to hold,drill & rivet!! Any suggestions are greatly appreciated!! Tom in Ohio ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 10, 2001
From: John Lawson <jwlawson(at)hargray.com>
Subject: Semper Fi...
...and Happy Birthday to all of my fellow Marines on the RV List! John ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Pflanzer" <rpflanze2(at)home.com>
Subject: New Project - Long post - Delete now if not interested
Date: Nov 10, 2001
Fellow listers, I've been off-list for about two months while I finished up the sale of my RV-6. With that now completed, I am patiently awaiting the arrival of my RV-7A kit. It has been fun to consider all the "do overs". I pretty much have all the options, engine, prop, paint, lighting and wiring all figured out already. I'm really itching to get going. I'm hoping for a very quick build cycle, less than 24 months. One thing I found interesting that I thought I'd share, was my comparison of instrument options. I set some parameters for my self and then set about to see what was out there. My parameters were VFR cross county; AOA; color moving map in the panel; fuel totalizer; and autopilot w/altitude hold, gps following, and climb/descent capable. I looked at EFIS options, standard instruments, engine monitors, etc and did a comparison of various combinations and options. The results are in a spreadsheet at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RV-6and6A/files/ Click on "N417G" and then click on "Instrument Comparison". What I found was that the EFIS/One couldn't be beat by any other combination that I could find. It also provided the most "value add" as well. The closest I could come was to use standard flight instruments and the IK2000 engine monitor. Although the GPS side of the EFIS/One is not fully developed yet and the annual fee is pretty steep, it's still not a bad way to go. I think that's the way I'm leaning. The whole panel will consist of an EFIS/One, AOA, and a radio stack. If any of you would like to share some of your "do overs" or nifty options that you've seen on other projects, I'd very much like to hear from you. Please send them on to me directly at rpflanze2(at)home.com. Randy Pflanzer N2517C - LongEZ - Sold N417G - RV-6 - Sold RV-7A - Just starting ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Henley" <rv6plt(at)netzero.net>
Subject: Re: New Project - Long post - Delete now if not interested
Date: Nov 10, 2001
Randy, Who makes the EFIS one and the IK2000 systems? Do they have websites? John Henley, RV7 fuselage ----- Original Message ----- From: Randy Pflanzer <rpflanze2(at)home.com> Subject: RV-List: New Project - Long post - Delete now if not interested > > Fellow listers, > > I've been off-list for about two months while I finished up the sale of > my RV-6. With that now completed, I am patiently awaiting the arrival > of my RV-7A kit. It has been fun to consider all the "do overs". I > pretty much have all the options, engine, prop, paint, lighting and > wiring all figured out already. I'm really itching to get going. I'm > hoping for a very quick build cycle, less than 24 months. > > One thing I found interesting that I thought I'd share, was my > comparison of instrument options. I set some parameters for my self and > then set about to see what was out there. My parameters were VFR cross > county; AOA; color moving map in the panel; fuel totalizer; and > autopilot w/altitude hold, gps following, and climb/descent capable. I > looked at EFIS options, standard instruments, engine monitors, etc and > did a comparison of various combinations and options. > > The results are in a spreadsheet at > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RV-6and6A/files/ Click on "N417G" and > then click on "Instrument Comparison". What I found was that the > EFIS/One couldn't be beat by any other combination that I could find. > It also provided the most "value add" as well. The closest I could come > was to use standard flight instruments and the IK2000 engine monitor. > Although the GPS side of the EFIS/One is not fully developed yet and the > annual fee is pretty steep, it's still not a bad way to go. I think > that's the way I'm leaning. The whole panel will consist of an > EFIS/One, AOA, and a radio stack. > > If any of you would like to share some of your "do overs" or nifty > options that you've seen on other projects, I'd very much like to hear > from you. Please send them on to me directly at rpflanze2(at)home.com. > > Randy Pflanzer > N2517C - LongEZ - Sold > N417G - RV-6 - Sold > RV-7A - Just starting > > ---------------------------------------------------- Sign Up for NetZero Platinum Today Only $9.95 per month! http://my.netzero.net/s/signup?r=platinum&refcd=PT97 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Emrath" <Emrath(at)home.com>
Subject: Frey Jig
Date: Nov 10, 2001
I have finally removed my fuselage "canoe" from the jig (YES!) and I no longer need this. If interested, first $600 gets it. This jig can be used for the -4 (probably includes Rockets) or -6 models, maybe the -3 I'm not sure. It can be moved in a p-u truck, I've got it sitting in my S-10 waiting to go to the hanger later today for storage but full size p-u with 8' bed would be best. This comes with the "bird cage" option to hold the F604 and f605 bulkheads in proper position. My wings fit like gloves. If interested, contact me off list. Marty in Brentwood TN (Nashville area). ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 10, 2001
Subject: Re: Semper Fi...
From: Denis Walsh <deniswalsh(at)earthlink.net>
on 11/10/01 04:59, John Lawson at jwlawson(at)hargray.com wrote: > > ...and Happy Birthday to all of my fellow Marines on the RV List! > > John > > Me, too. Happy Birthday and thank God for all the deceased Marine heroes who need to be remembered on this day. And a salute to all who have survived, too. (Former) Pfc Denis L. Walsh, USMCR ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Norman, MD" <jnorman(at)intermapsystems.com>
Subject: IK-2000 (Was: New Project - Long post - Delete now if not interested)
Date: Nov 10, 2001
Listers, I'm in the process of installing the IK-2000 engine monitoring system, and am documenting installation with a digital camera. I will provide a complete run-down on installation and operation within a few weeks. It is a very nice instrument, but is new to the market so there are very few out there yet. They are great people to work with, and they have several options of which perameters get displayed in the big read-out on the top unit. In my opinion, it cannot be beat for the money. Does a LOT more than the VM1000, and is LOTS less $$$. Here is their website: http://www.i-ktechnologies.com Jim Tampa 6A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Kitz" <jkitz(at)greenapple.com>
Subject: Veterans Day
Date: Nov 10, 2001
The Marines may be having a birthday but I want to wish all my fellow veterans on the List a thankful Veterans Day tomorrow for all their sacrifices. John Kitz USAF 55-59 N721JK Ohio ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 10, 2001
From: Ed Holyoke <bicyclop(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment
Tom, I treated this just like the rear top skins. I drilled the ribs and such first, strapped it down (lightly, until the top center was drilled), and backdrilled everything from inside. My wife held a wood block and ran clecos. There were some difficult holes to get to and you'd never make all of it without an angle drill, though. Those holes you're worried about along the sides are not too hard to backdrill using a long bit. Once you get a bunch of clecos in it, the skin stays down well. I'd say hold off riveting as long as you still need access to behind the panel. Ed Holyoke QB6 in SoCal -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tom & Cathy Ervin Subject: RV-List: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment List: I am fitting the upper cowl and was wondering when ready to rivet the Forward Top Skin (F-6106) how did other builders drill & rivet the edge that meets the fuselage on both sides? My kit is a QB and the holes are drilled and dimpled already about 18 in. back on both sides of the upper fuselage skin. Do I finish riveting the fuselage skin first, or are both skins drilled to match and riveted together? Even with cargo straps the F-6106 skin is going to be tough to hold,drill & rivet!! Any suggestions are greatly appreciated!! Tom in Ohio = ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 10, 2001
From: Miller Robert <rmiller3(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment
How do you then dimple skins lying over either ribs, or longerons, which are already in place in wing or fuse? I can't seem to visualize how this is accomplished. Robert Ed Holyoke wrote: > > Tom, > > I treated this just like the rear top skins. I drilled the ribs and such > first, strapped it down (lightly, until the top center was drilled), and > backdrilled everything from inside. My wife held a wood block and ran > clecos. There were some difficult holes to get to and you'd never make > all of it without an angle drill, though. Those holes you're worried > about along the sides are not too hard to backdrill using a long bit. > Once you get a bunch of clecos in it, the skin stays down well. I'd say > hold off riveting as long as you still need access to behind the panel. > > Ed Holyoke > QB6 in SoCal > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tom & Cathy > Ervin > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV-List: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment > > > > List: I am fitting the upper cowl and was wondering when ready to rivet > the Forward Top Skin (F-6106) how did other builders drill & rivet the > edge that meets the fuselage on both sides? > My kit is a QB and the holes are drilled and dimpled already > about 18 in. back on both sides of the upper fuselage skin. Do I finish > riveting the fuselage skin first, or are both skins drilled to match and > riveted together? > Even with cargo straps the F-6106 skin is going to be tough to > hold,drill & rivet!! Any suggestions are greatly appreciated!! > > Tom in Ohio > > = > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 10, 2001
From: Ed Holyoke <bicyclop(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment
Robert, Some of the holes on the forward end of the top longerons are already dimpled and awaiting rivets. I backdrilled through these. Further back, where they are already riveted, you space your rivets between the existing and countersink the underlying skin. Ed Holyoke -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Miller Robert Subject: Re: RV-List: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment How do you then dimple skins lying over either ribs, or longerons, which are already in place in wing or fuse? I can't seem to visualize how this is accomplished. Robert Ed Holyoke wrote: > > Tom, > > I treated this just like the rear top skins. I drilled the ribs and such > first, strapped it down (lightly, until the top center was drilled), and > backdrilled everything from inside. My wife held a wood block and ran > clecos. There were some difficult holes to get to and you'd never make > all of it without an angle drill, though. Those holes you're worried > about along the sides are not too hard to backdrill using a long bit. > Once you get a bunch of clecos in it, the skin stays down well. I'd say > hold off riveting as long as you still need access to behind the panel. > > Ed Holyoke > QB6 in SoCal > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tom & Cathy > Ervin > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV-List: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment > > > > List: I am fitting the upper cowl and was wondering when ready to rivet > the Forward Top Skin (F-6106) how did other builders drill & rivet the > edge that meets the fuselage on both sides? > My kit is a QB and the holes are drilled and dimpled already > about 18 in. back on both sides of the upper fuselage skin. Do I finish > riveting the fuselage skin first, or are both skins drilled to match and > riveted together? > Even with cargo straps the F-6106 skin is going to be tough to > hold,drill & rivet!! Any suggestions are greatly appreciated!! > > Tom in Ohio > > = > > = ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Paulbaird(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 10, 2001
Subject: Next RVator?
anyone know when the next RVator is coming? Thanks, Paul 90355 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 10, 2001
From: Jeff Point <jpoint(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: New Project - Long post - Delete now if not interested
John Henley wrote: > >Randy, > Who makes the EFIS one and the IK2000 systems? Do they have websites? > > http://bluemountainavionics.com/index.html for the EFIS/one ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 10, 2001
From: Miller Robert <rmiller3(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment
"Further back, where they are already riveted, you space your rivets between the existing and countersink the underlying skin." Ed: Thanks for the reply. Countersink underlying structure... makes sense. But, then do you countersink or dimple the overlying skin? If Countersink, then the thinness of the skin is an issue? Robert Ed Holyoke wrote: > > Robert, > > Some of the holes on the forward end of the top longerons are already > dimpled and awaiting rivets. I backdrilled through these. Further back, > where they are already riveted, you space your rivets between the > existing and countersink the underlying skin. > > Ed Holyoke > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Miller Robert > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment > > > How do you then dimple skins lying over either ribs, or longerons, which > are > already in place in wing or fuse? I can't seem to visualize how this is > accomplished. > Robert > > Ed Holyoke wrote: > > > > > Tom, > > > > I treated this just like the rear top skins. I drilled the ribs and > such > > first, strapped it down (lightly, until the top center was drilled), > and > > backdrilled everything from inside. My wife held a wood block and ran > > clecos. There were some difficult holes to get to and you'd never make > > all of it without an angle drill, though. Those holes you're worried > > about along the sides are not too hard to backdrill using a long bit. > > Once you get a bunch of clecos in it, the skin stays down well. I'd > say > > hold off riveting as long as you still need access to behind the > panel. > > > > Ed Holyoke > > QB6 in SoCal > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tom & Cathy > > Ervin > > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > > Subject: RV-List: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment > > > > > > > > List: I am fitting the upper cowl and was wondering when ready to > rivet > > the Forward Top Skin (F-6106) how did other builders drill & rivet the > > edge that meets the fuselage on both sides? > > My kit is a QB and the holes are drilled and dimpled already > > about 18 in. back on both sides of the upper fuselage skin. Do I > finish > > riveting the fuselage skin first, or are both skins drilled to match > and > > riveted together? > > Even with cargo straps the F-6106 skin is going to be tough to > > hold,drill & rivet!! Any suggestions are greatly appreciated!! > > > > Tom in Ohio > > > > = > > > > > > = > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ross" <rmickey(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Whelen wiring questions
Date: Nov 10, 2001
I have the A600-PG/PR wingtip assembly and the HDA,CF power pack. I want to alternate between the left and right strobes. Is this how I wire it? Left strobe in socket 3 or 4 Right strobe in socket 2 Jumper pins 1 and 2 in socket 1 (trigger) What is the proper size wire for the HDA,CF power +,- runs? It is a 12 V system. What is the proper way to wire the forward and tail position lights? Can I use a common ground at the wing tip, tie the two positive leads together at the wing and run one wire to a switch and power supply? What would be the proper size wire for this combination? Ross Mickey RV-6A builder ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MeangreenRV4(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 10, 2001
Subject: Checking Spinner Back Plate
Yesterday was gorgeous, no wind 60+ miles visibility 76 degrees it was time for my wife & I to fly somewhere for lunch. As I pulled over for a run up I saw the shadow of my spinner on the ground, it appeared to be a little off center at idle, when I did my run up it smoothed up, I was going to do an oil change when I got back anyway so I would check then. During the oil change I pulled the spinner, to my amazement I saw a big crack in the back plate. "GROUNDED" its now time to remove the prop. Once I had the back plate off this thing was ready to self disintegrate. Cracks were every where. This was the 13" backplate that Vans sells with the kit. Its a scary thought to lose a spinner in-flight. The cause of this problem I believe is from installing some anti-chafing tape between the front spinner plate and spinner. The tape was gone and that made the spinner lose on the front plate, that small amount of play fatigued the back plate. I cannot see my spinner from in the plane so I consider myself lucky I saw that shadow of my spinner while my engine was running. Lesson learned...... never assume anything when it comes to airplanes. Tim Barnes N39TB 100hrs ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 10, 2001
From: Ed Holyoke <bicyclop(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment
Robert, My opinion is: dimple wherever you can, countersink if you must. If you c-sink on .032, which is technically allowable, you run the risk of going too deep and weakening the joint. Thinner material shouldn't be c-sunk. Dimples are more sure of getting a full strength joint. Ed -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Miller Robert Subject: Re: RV-List: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment "Further back, where they are already riveted, you space your rivets between the existing and countersink the underlying skin." Ed: Thanks for the reply. Countersink underlying structure... makes sense. But, then do you countersink or dimple the overlying skin? If Countersink, then the thinness of the skin is an issue? Robert Ed Holyoke wrote: ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 10, 2001
From: Miller Robert <rmiller3(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment
Sorry to beat this one to death... but, I guess the heart of my question is this: Is it allowable then to dimple the top skin over a countersunk hole in an underlying rib or longeron? Thanks again. Robert Ed Holyoke wrote: > > Robert, > > My opinion is: dimple wherever you can, countersink if you must. If you > c-sink on .032, which is technically allowable, you run the risk of > going too deep and weakening the joint. Thinner material shouldn't be > c-sunk. Dimples are more sure of getting a full strength joint. > > Ed > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Miller Robert > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment > > > "Further back, > where they are already riveted, you space your rivets between the > existing and countersink the underlying skin." > > Ed: > Thanks for the reply. Countersink underlying structure... makes sense. > But, > then do you countersink or dimple the overlying skin? If Countersink, > then > the thinness of the skin is an issue? > Robert > > Ed Holyoke wrote: > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Greg & Cindy Tanner" <gtanner(at)bendcable.com>
Subject: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment
Date: Nov 10, 2001
Robert, As long as the part you countersink is thick enough to still be in spec, it is proper procedure to do what you are asking. There are many places on the 9A kit where that procedure is in the instructions. Greg 9A -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Miller Robert Subject: Re: RV-List: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment Sorry to beat this one to death... but, I guess the heart of my question is this: Is it allowable then to dimple the top skin over a countersunk hole in an underlying rib or longeron? Thanks again. Robert Ed Holyoke wrote: > > Robert, > > My opinion is: dimple wherever you can, countersink if you must. If you > c-sink on .032, which is technically allowable, you run the risk of > going too deep and weakening the joint. Thinner material shouldn't be > c-sunk. Dimples are more sure of getting a full strength joint. > > Ed > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Miller Robert > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment > > > "Further back, > where they are already riveted, you space your rivets between the > existing and countersink the underlying skin." > > Ed: > Thanks for the reply. Countersink underlying structure... makes sense. > But, > then do you countersink or dimple the overlying skin? If Countersink, > then > the thinness of the skin is an issue? > Robert > > Ed Holyoke wrote: > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jim jewell" <jjewell(at)telus.net>
Subject: Re: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment
Date: Nov 10, 2001
Ed, If I read you correctly, you are asking how dimples in the skin are best accomplished after the substructure has been dimpled. I first located the center of the skin and drilled it so that I could remove and replace the skin for repeated fitting. Next I chose to pre-shape the skin before back drilling it. to do this I put two appropriate lengths of two-by-four in my vice, then I inserted the longeron edge of the skin between the two-by-fours. I used two C-lamps to hold the outer ends of the wood and the skin tightly clamped. Using gentle steady force I shaped the skin so that after repeated tries it droped into place and required little or no effort to Cleko it into place. Next I used the C-frame and dimpling tools to dimple the skin. I did need an assist to hold the skin carefully in position during the C-frame dimpling process. This forward skin is thick enough to machine counter sink, even so I always try to squeeze or drive dimples wherever possible, I hope I read you right, lots of luck! dimple the skin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Miller Robert" <rmiller3(at)earthlink.net> Subject: Re: RV-List: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment > > Sorry to beat this one to death... but, > I guess the heart of my question is this: Is it allowable then to dimple the > top skin over a countersunk hole in an underlying rib or longeron? > Thanks again. > Robert > > Ed Holyoke wrote: > > > > > Robert, > > > > My opinion is: dimple wherever you can, countersink if you must. If you > > c-sink on .032, which is technically allowable, you run the risk of > > going too deep and weakening the joint. Thinner material shouldn't be > > c-sunk. Dimples are more sure of getting a full strength joint. > > > > Ed > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Miller Robert > > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > > Subject: Re: RV-List: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment > > > > > > "Further back, > > where they are already riveted, you space your rivets between the > > existing and countersink the underlying skin." > > > > Ed: > > Thanks for the reply. Countersink underlying structure... makes sense. > > But, > > then do you countersink or dimple the overlying skin? If Countersink, > > then > > the thinness of the skin is an issue? > > Robert > > > > Ed Holyoke wrote: > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 10, 2001
From: Will Cretsinger <cretsinger(at)ticnet.com>
Subject: Re: pro-seal-attach canopy
The shop that painted my -6A applied a Proseal fillet around the perimeter of the canopy and windows. It looks great and seals unquestionably. It appears that they applied the fillet after paint was dry by masking the plexi about 1/8 inch from the frame. The fillet was then carefully laid between the masking and the frame. I suspect the masking was removed immediately after the fillet was laid down. Will Cretsinger, Arlington, Texas -6A flying past 420 hours Randall Henderson wrote: > > > I said [regarding RTV]: > > Not a good idea. You don't want that stuff near your plexiglass -- it will > > promote crazing. > > I think I have to retract that -- someone questioned me about it offline and > frankly I couldn't remember where I got the idea it would craze, so I went > back and looked at the archives and it appears that a lot of people have > used RTV on their canopy with no ill effects. If someone has had problems > hopefully they will speak up, but I can't honestly say I have direct > knowledge either way. > > I do stand by my recommendation to use Lexel or Proseal however -- since > both are paintable unlike silicone based RTVs you don't risk > contamination/fisheyes etc. on adjacent aluminum surfaces. > > Randall Henderson, RV-6 N6R (~300 hrs) > Portland, OR > www.vanshomewing.org > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 10, 2001
From: Ed Holyoke <bicyclop(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment
Robert, Yeah, that's the right way to do it. Multiple dimples nest into each other just fine, but if it's too thick to dimple, you c-sink it and the dimple above has someplace to sit. Also, thicker material has a remaining bore in it that is unaffected by the countersinking, assuring that the rivet is fully supported. See: http://home.flash.net/~gila/rivet_spec/rivet_a.htm for more info about correct riveting procedures. Ed Holyoke Sorry to beat this one to death... but, I guess the heart of my question is this: Is it allowable then to dimple the top skin over a countersunk hole in an underlying rib or longeron? Thanks again. Robert Ed Holyoke wrote: > > Robert, > > My opinion is: dimple wherever you can, countersink if you must. If you > c-sink on .032, which is technically allowable, you run the risk of > going too deep and weakening the joint. Thinner material shouldn't be > c-sunk. Dimples are more sure of getting a full strength joint. > > Ed > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Wheeler North <wnorth(at)sdccd.cc.ca.us>
Subject: rtv
Date: Nov 10, 2001
I believe the RTV's that have ammonia are not to be used. I had a compatiblility chart around here once for plexi, but I can't find it. But any acrylic vendor would have this chart. W ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 10, 2001
From: Bobby Hester <bhester(at)apex.net>
RV7and7A
Subject: Trim Cable Cover?
About to close up the left elevator. I have the trim reinforcing bracket riveted to the skin I am ready to install the K1100-06 nutplates. Now the question - Do I countersink or dimple the screw hole in the reinforcing bracket, what about the cover plate counter sink or dimple. I am thinking I should countersink the bracket and dimple the plate. What have you guys done? I also have 7 small K1000 nutplates and small gold tone (may be brass)round head screws, that I have not figured out where they go, anyone know? -- Surfing the Web from Hopkinsville, KY Visit my web site at: http://www.geocities.com/hester-hoptown/RVSite/ Finishing RV7A empannage :-) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 10, 2001
From: Bobby Hester <bhester(at)apex.net>
Subject: Re: pro-seal-attach canopy
Randall Henderson wrote: > > I said [regarding RTV]: > > Not a good idea. You don't want that stuff near your plexiglass -- it will > > promote crazing. > > I think I have to retract that -- someone questioned me about it offline and > frankly I couldn't remember where I got the idea it would craze, so I went > back and looked at the archives and it appears that a lot of people have > used RTV on their canopy with no ill effects. If someone has had problems > hopefully they will speak up, but I can't honestly say I have direct > knowledge either way. > > I do stand by my recommendation to use Lexel or Proseal however -- since > both are paintable unlike silicone based RTVs you don't risk > contamination/fisheyes etc. on adjacent aluminum surfaces. > > Randall Henderson, RV-6 N6R (~300 hrs) > Portland, OR > www.vanshomewing.org It was locktite that caused the crazing. -- Surfing the Web from Hopkinsville, KY Visit my web site at: http://www.geocities.com/hester-hoptown/RVSite/ Finishing RV7A empannage :-) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 10, 2001
From: tom sargent <sarg314(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Stick grips again
I like the shape of the Inifinity stick grips, but they're expensive and - not to reopen the switch debate - but I really only want a single trigger-style PTT switch. I haven't been able to find anything like this. I'm thinking I'd like to buy a grip shaped like the infinity, but with no switches at all and then mount one right under my index finder. Does any one know of any grips like this? - No switches, just contoured black plastic made in left and righthand versions that I can modify. thanks -- Tom Sargent. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RGray67968(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 11, 2001
Subject: Re: RV6-A-QB Forward Top Skin Attachment
In a message dated 11/10/01 11:11:30 AM Pacific Standard Time, rmiller3(at)earthlink.net writes: > "Further back, > where they are already riveted, you space your rivets between the > existing and countersink the underlying skin." Tom, I didn't do mine as suggested above due to the closeness of the rivets. I drilled out about 8 rivets on each side in this area (they were put in from the factory on the QB) and used the same pre dimpled holes to nail down the skin. Worked out perfect on my application (and no countersinking). Good luck. Rick Gray RV6 (Ohio) at the Buffalo Farm final stuff and paint prep (takes much longer than building - no joke either) please archive ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 11, 2001
From: John Lawson <jwlawson(at)hargray.com>
Subject: Countersinking/dimpling wing skin/skin doubler/wing ribs
I'm getting ready to do something (dimple or countersink) the inboard main skin, wingwalk doubler, and ribs 1-5 for my left wing. What combination has worked best for other list members? I'm wary about countersinking the skin and/or doubler, because they are so thin (and my countersinking skills aren't the best in the world), but if that's the way to go, I'll do it. Thanks! Semper Fi John RV-6 (left wing) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Eli Liebermann" <eliebermann(at)monmouth.com>
Subject:
Date: Nov 11, 2001
Is there an advantage in NOT riveting the front bottom skin of the fuselage before taking it off the jig (keeping it on with clecos)? If yes, what is the it, and when is the best time for riveting it? Eli RV6A fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Pflanzer" <rpflanze2(at)home.com>
Subject: Re:
Date: Nov 11, 2001
The advantage is being able to get to your instrument panel wiring. This skin was the last panel I riveted up just before painting. Randy Pflanzer RV-6 (sold) RV-7A (on order) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eli Liebermann" <eliebermann(at)monmouth.com> Subject: RV-List: > > > Is there an advantage in NOT riveting the front bottom skin of the fuselage > before taking it off the jig (keeping it on with clecos)? If yes, what is > the it, and when is the best time for riveting it? > > Eli > RV6A fuselage > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Eric Newton" <enewton57(at)cableone.net>
Subject: Re: Countersinking/dimpling wing skin/skin doubler/wing ribs
Date: Nov 11, 2001
I dimpled all three and worked great. Eric Newton - Long Beach, MS RV-6A N57ME (Test Flying) www.ericsrv6a.com ----- Original Message ----- From: John Lawson <jwlawson(at)hargray.com> Subject: RV-List: Countersinking/dimpling wing skin/skin doubler/wing ribs > > I'm getting ready to do something (dimple or countersink) the inboard main skin, > wingwalk doubler, and ribs 1-5 for my left wing. What combination has worked best > for other list members? I'm wary about countersinking the skin and/or doubler, > because they are so thin (and my countersinking skills aren't the best in the > world), but if that's the way to go, I'll do it. Thanks! > > Semper Fi > John > RV-6 (left wing) > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bowen" <Larry(at)bowenaero.com>
Subject: 8 gear bolts
Date: Nov 11, 2001
The plans call out AN7-21A bolts for the two big bolts that attach the gear to the fuse, the parts bag with all the gear hdwr had AN7-21's instead (they have the hole for the cotter pin). Am I the only one? Does it matter? Should I use these AN7-21 bolts with the non-cotter pin nuts? Thx, Larry Bowen Email: Larry(at)BowenAero.com Web: http://BowenAero.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "john banks" <tinmanjj(at)ptd.net>
Subject: Re: Countersinking/dimpling wing skin/skin doubler/wing ribs
Date: Nov 11, 2001
dimple everything ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Lawson" <jwlawson(at)hargray.com> Subject: RV-List: Countersinking/dimpling wing skin/skin doubler/wing ribs > > I'm getting ready to do something (dimple or countersink) the inboard main skin, > wingwalk doubler, and ribs 1-5 for my left wing. What combination has worked best > for other list members? I'm wary about countersinking the skin and/or doubler, > because they are so thin (and my countersinking skills aren't the best in the > world), but if that's the way to go, I'll do it. Thanks! > > Semper Fi > John > RV-6 (left wing) > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 11, 2001
Subject: Re: Countersinking/dimpling wing skin/skin doubler/wing
ribs
From: Denis Walsh <deniswalsh(at)earthlink.net>
on 11/11/01 07:39, John Lawson at jwlawson(at)hargray.com wrote: > > I'm getting ready to do something (dimple or countersink) the inboard main > skin, > wingwalk doubler, and ribs 1-5 for my left wing. What combination has worked > best > for other list members? I'm wary about countersinking the skin and/or > doubler, > because they are so thin (and my countersinking skills aren't the best in the > world), but if that's the way to go, I'll do it. Thanks! > > Semper Fi > John > RV-6 (left wing) > > > > > > I dimpled. Always dimpled whenever possible. I believe it is stronger, but can't prove it. Only countersunk when I had to. Some that come to mind are on the tank where it overlaps the spar, and the hinges where you don't want to do either to the soft hinge strip, so you dimple in to countersink for that triple layer. DLW ________________________________________________________________________________
From: SSPRING83(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 11, 2001
Subject: Re: RV-List Long gear VS short gear
Can any of you guys tell me what the advantage is of the long gear on a rv4 vs the short gear? I have a -4 that was built in 92 and am assuming that it is the short gear that I hear you guys talk about. It would seem that while the long gear would offer a greater amount of ground clearance for the prop tips it would also detract from the forward visability that you need on takeoff or landing rollout. What is the advantage of having your nose sitting higher in the air?. Since you have to get the tail off the ground anyway in taking off and assume a slightly tail low attitude what is to be gained? Appreciate any feed back you can offer on this guys. Thanks George Spring rv-4 4375J Chester, Conn. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Louis I. Willig" <larywil(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: RV-List Long gear VS short gear
Date: Nov 11, 2001
----- Original Message ----- From: <SSPRING83(at)aol.com> Subject: RV-List: Re: RV-List Long gear VS short gear > > Can any of you guys tell me what the advantage is of the long gear on a > rv4 vs the short gear? I have a -4 that was built in 92 and am assuming that > it is the short gear that I hear you guys talk about. It would seem that > while the long gear would offer a greater amount of ground clearance for the > prop tips it would also detract from the forward visability that you need on > takeoff or landing rollout. What is the advantage of having your nose > sitting higher in the air?. Since you have to get the tail off the ground > anyway in taking off and assume a slightly tail low attitude what is to be > gained? Appreciate any feed back you can offer on this guys. Thanks > George Spring rv-4 4375J > Chester, Conn. George, I fly both a long gear and a short gear RV-4. There is no problem with visibility over the nose in the long gear -4. (I am just average height). Honestly, the reason for the long gear is for visual aesthetics :>). Van will tell you that the long gear was designed because the short gear allowed the tail wheel to hit first in a full stall 3 point landing. The problem is that it STILL hits first in a full stall 3 point landing. A stall depends on angle of attack. But the angle of attack in landing when compared with the surface angle of the runway varies in a real life situation. Variables, such as wind direction, speed, turbulence, runway level, aircraft speed and weight/balance characteristics, all make the 3 point landing impossible to do every time. In perfectly still air, I can nail a greaser 3 point landing 80-90% of the time. But the last time I had perfectly still air was a few years ago. A computer Auto-land system might do it but us earthlings aren't that good. If I had my 'druthers, I'd make the gear another 3 or 4 inches taller. It looks great with the front sitting up high. Like I said..."visual aesthetics"....that's why man invented red sports cars. Some folks will disagree with this opinion. C'est la vie. But, "A man's gotta know his limitations." And, I'm outta here now. It's Sunday and time to go flying. Peace to everyone, and may God save mankind from ourselves. Louis Louis I. Willig Penn Valley, PA 19072 (610) 668-4964 RV-4, IO-360, C/S 160 hrs ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: 8 gear bolts
Date: Nov 11, 2001
The FAA approves drilled bolts with self-locking nuts when the diameter is 5/16" or better. You should be ok. Cy Galley, TC - Chair, Emergency Aircraft Repair, Oshkosh Editor, EAA Safety Programs cgalley(at)qcbc.org or experimenter(at)eaa.org http://www.eaa.org for latest flying rules Always looking for articles for the Experimenter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Bowen" <Larry(at)bowenaero.com> Subject: RV-List: 8 gear bolts The plans call out AN7-21A bolts for the two big bolts that attach the gear to the fuse, the parts bag with all the gear hdwr had AN7-21's instead (they have the hole for the cotter pin). Am I the only one? Does it matter? Should I use these AN7-21 bolts with the non-cotter pin nuts? Thx, Larry Bowen Email: Larry(at)BowenAero.com Web: http://BowenAero.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "IK Technologies - Ralph Krongold" <2pilots(at)mediaone.net>
Subject: Re: RV-List Digest: 36 Msgs - 11/10/01
Date: Nov 11, 2001
Original Message: From: "John Henley" <rv6plt(at)netzero.net> Subject: Re: RV-List: New Project - Long post - Delete now if not interested Randy, Who makes the EFIS one and the IK2000 systems? Do they have websites? John Henley, RV7 fuselage John: The IK2000 is produced by I-K Technologies. Their Website is: www.i-ktechnologies.com (be sure to type a hyphen between the letter "i" and the letter "k") ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 11, 2001
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Have You Tried the New List Browse Feature??
Hi Listers, I've been getting a LOT of very positive feedback on the new Email List Browsing feature I added to the suite of List services a couple of weeks ago. A number of List members have written to say that they love the new List Browser because they can keep tabs on the latest List messages throughout the day without having to constantly check their email or wait for the Digest issue to come out. The List Browse Function allows you to use your web browser to view the current 7 day's worth of List messages for the give List. The indexes are updated every 30 minutes with any new messages that have been posted. You can sort all of the message indexes by Thread, Subject, Author, or Date and easily track and find current threads. You can check out the New List Browse Feature by going to the following URL and clicking on the List of your choice: http://www.matronics.com/listbrowse Please remember that November is List Fund Raiser month!! The continued operation and upgrade of the Email Lists are _entirely_ supported by YOUR Contributions and support. You'll never see annoying, flashing banner ads, or other forms of commercialism on these Lists. Just people sharing information, data, and stories about your favorite topic, plain (plane?) and simple. If you enjoy the Lists and all of the services here, won't you take moment and make a quick Contribution? It fast and easy using the SSL Secure Web site with your Visa or MasterCard. Or, you can also send a personal check to the address listed below. SSL Secure Web Site: http://www.matronics.com/contribution USMail: Matt Dralle c/o Matronics PO Box 347 Livermore, CA 94551-0347 Don't forget that the "List of Contributors" will be coming out in just a few short weeks! Don't you want to make sure you're name is on it? I would like to wish a special "Thank You" to everyone that has made a Contribution so far this year!! Matt Dralle Email List Administrator ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Eli Liebermann" <eliebermann(at)monmouth.com>
Subject: RV4 & RV6 Jig available in NJ
Date: Nov 11, 2001
An excellent Aluminum jig (was used to build an RV4 and an RV6) is available in central jersey for $200. If interested please contact me at eliebermann(at)monmouth.com. Eli RV-6A ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 11, 2001
From: Rv8don(at)aol.com
Subject: RV8 Cowl Trimming & Attach
For those of yo who have already done it, how did you trim the upper and lower cowl halves (the horizontal line) to fit each other nicely? I've got the upper and lower pieces trimmed and fit to the fuselage just fine but the best way to trim and fit them to each other escapes me. Thanks in advance. -Don RV8 NJ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Norman" <nhunger(at)sprint.ca>
Subject: Re:
Date: Nov 11, 2001
> Is there an advantage in NOT riveting the front bottom skin of the fuselage > before taking it off the jig (keeping it on with clecos)? If yes, what is > the it, and when is the best time for riveting it? I found that the bottom skin had to be on to get the firewall rigid to the fuselage. It's the top front skin that will be the very last one to get permanent. Perhaps Randy thought you were talking about the top one. Rivet the bottom skin while the jig is holding everything square then you're done with the jig. Norman Hunger RV6A Delta BC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "William Davis" <rvpilot(at)mpinet.net>
Subject: Re: Countersinking/dimpling wing skin/skin doubler/wing ribs
Date: Nov 11, 2001
John, Dimple all. Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Lawson" <jwlawson(at)hargray.com> Subject: RV-List: Countersinking/dimpling wing skin/skin doubler/wing ribs > > I'm getting ready to do something (dimple or countersink) the inboard main skin, > wingwalk doubler, and ribs 1-5 for my left wing. What combination has worked best > for other list members? I'm wary about countersinking the skin and/or doubler, > because they are so thin (and my countersinking skills aren't the best in the > world), but if that's the way to go, I'll do it. Thanks! > > Semper Fi > John > RV-6 (left wing) > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Wheeler North <wnorth(at)sdccd.cc.ca.us>
"'RV-List Digest Server '"@matronics.com
Subject: Amp gauge
Date: Nov 11, 2001
Doug, thx for the tips, will persue. Did figure out that both radios do it, one is kx97A and the other is garmin190gpscom with rubber stubby antenna. Had scope at 10ns which is fastest it goes and found about 85mv sinewave during xmit on either radio. now for the fun one. If radio is below 122.0 amp gauge goes full neg, if above 122.0 it goes full pos??? At 122.0 it kinda wanders. the .147 was a ceramic. I didn't bother to read it, I just stuck it in my beckman dvom which also reads caps/diodes/transistors/and leds. Will go back and trace out antenna shield circuit, but I think this isn't it as the gpscom also causes it. was going to try with caps between every post on the amp gauge next. I also found that by moving the antenna cable around behind the panel it changed it some, but not a lot. More later, as i play with it. thx W -----Original Message----- From: Doug Gray Subject: Re: RV-List: Amp gauge Wheeler, Hmm...It is almost certainly RF related yet you are unable to decouple it...BTW the capacitor needs to be ceramic otherwise it's impedance will be too high. A .147u is fine but it is an odd value for a capacitor , a 0.1uF ceramic would usually be marked 0.1 or 104 (104 = 10 followed by 4 zeros = 100000pF 0.1uF) I suspect you may have some RF impressed on the electrical system or ground. I would look at the antenna cabling first, the 'scope may give some odd traces which will be difficult to relate back to your actual problem area. Do you have access to a 50 ohm RF dummy load? If so, connect this to the radio in place of the aircraft's antenna, if your probelm disappears then the antenna may not be wired correctly. If you can run a known good length of cable between the radio and the antenna this would confirm RF integrity. Is the antenna itself properly grounded to the airframe? Check by disconnecting the feedline and check for continuity from the antenna's BNC socket and the airframe. In any case, check the feedline (RG58 ?) ground braid and signal conductors have good continuity from BNC plug to BNC plug. If the radio's antenna socket is not grounded through the radio (check with the multimeter) then ensure that it does not become grounded through the radio chassis. Whatever you do, only transmit with the correct load, you do not want to smoke the radio. In terms of investigating with the scope, you would need a scale suitable for the Tx frequency - 130-140MHz. (try 10 nS to start with). I take it that the symptoms are the same with and without the engine running? Other than these comments, it is difficult debugging this stuff without actually being there. Problems like these soon yield to a fairly methodical approach. Keep me posted. Doug Gray Sydney, Australia Wheeler North wrote: > > Folks, > > tried the a .147mf cap on the amp gauge, on the shunt and it had no effect. > > I have a fluke 99 scope so I'll try to get a few pics of the pwr/gnd circuit > during xmit this weekend. > > I'm on the rv digest so send me an email if you want me to forward the pics > to you direct. Any particular frequency/time range I should be looking for? > > thx > W ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Eustace Bowhay" <ebowhay(at)jetstream.net>
Subject: Safety & 0perating costs
Date: Nov 11, 2001
In the last post we were at the cowling stage. Both my 6 and the 6A kit are the old style cowling, not the current S type. As those who have finished their cowlings I am sure they would agree that a long story could be written on fitting them. On my 6 with the spinner centered on the circle on the front of the cowling I noticed that the engine sagged about a quarter inch during the first two years (Dyno- focal mount). On the 6A I fitted the cowlings so the top of the spinner was only !/8 inch below the top of the ring to try to compensate for the sag. Several builders have had the sad experience of the long pins that hold the two halves together becoming unsecured at the front. The pin then works its way forward into the prop. I like the idea of lining the NASA vents up with this pin and then inserting it from the rear. With the engine hung and the cowlings fitted we start to get into the more serious safety items. Will start with one that has been beaten to death on the list, the gascolator. To install one or not and if so where. For me it is a must, for me to fly without one would be against everything I have learned over the years. For me safety is about eliminating every possible chance of an engine failure due to causes that we as builders have control of. The gascolator is the only means we have of trapping large quantities of water, the way fuel is handled today the chances of getting contaminated fuel are remote but it only has to happen once. One situation would be when the a/c is parked for a couple of rainy days on a bit of a slope and rain gets by a loose fitting tank cap or seeping by the shaft in the center of the cap. We come out to the a/c in a hurry to leave and forget to check the tanks or we check but because the a/c is not level we don't get it all out, this is all it takes. On my 6 I installed the gascolator on the left side of the firewall and it had to be up a bit to clear the mount making it very inconvenient to drain and also required the boost pump to be on to drain it. I later moved it into the wing root location with a short piece of hose protruding through the fairing this puts it low enough I can now drain it easily without the boost pump and will gravity fill with fuel in the event of a blown tank. Also wanted the the gascolator before the boost pump to reduce the chances of a leak at the gascolator,especially now with the 20 odd pounds of pressure required for the Bendix fuel injection. Am uncomfortable with any type of inline filter, feel it raises the risk of fuel starvation and don't feel it is required with a screen in the gascolator and another one at the Bendix throttle body. Eustace Bowhay Blind Bay, B.C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Pflanzer" <rpflanze2(at)home.com>
Subject: Re:
Date: Nov 11, 2001
Norman and others, No, I understood it to be the bottom skin. I did the final drilling of the bottom skin while it was in the jig, but I swear that the last bit of riveting that I did was to put the bottom skin on and then paint. The only drawback was that I had to use pop rivets along the lower firewall/skin because the engine mount prevented me from getting a buck in there. If I had to do it over again, (which I will on my new -7A), I will pull the mount off just far enough to buck the rivets. I actually put the top skin on early so that I could fiberglass the windshield on for the slider/rollbar assembly. I found it easy to do all the wiring and plumbing from the bottom and it also kept me from putting things that later would not be accessable from under the panel. Some of my friends wired things up with the top skin off and then found that they had mounted a few things that were tough (impossible) to access from underneath. I don't think that is a major issue but it is something to watch for. Randy Pflanzer RV-6 (sold) RV-7A (on the way) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Norman" <nhunger(at)sprint.ca> Subject: Re: RV-List: > > > Is there an advantage in NOT riveting the front bottom skin of the > fuselage > > before taking it off the jig (keeping it on with clecos)? If yes, what is > > the it, and when is the best time for riveting it? > > I found that the bottom skin had to be on to get the firewall rigid to the > fuselage. It's the top front skin that will be the very last one to get > permanent. Perhaps Randy thought you were talking about the top one. > > Rivet the bottom skin while the jig is holding everything square then you're > done with the jig. > > Norman Hunger > RV6A Delta BC > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "William Davis" <rvpilot(at)mpinet.net>
Subject: Re: RV-List Long gear VS short gear
Date: Nov 11, 2001
George, I have built both versions and the long gear 4 is definitely easier to 3 point properly, plus, I think that it looks better but that is a personal opinion. The trouble is, just the gear legs cannot be changed, the engine mount has to be changed also. Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: <SSPRING83(at)aol.com> Subject: RV-List: Re: RV-List Long gear VS short gear > > Can any of you guys tell me what the advantage is of the long gear on a > rv4 vs the short gear? I have a -4 that was built in 92 and am assuming that > it is the short gear that I hear you guys talk about. It would seem that > while the long gear would offer a greater amount of ground clearance for the > prop tips it would also detract from the forward visability that you need on > takeoff or landing rollout. What is the advantage of having your nose > sitting higher in the air?. Since you have to get the tail off the ground > anyway in taking off and assume a slightly tail low attitude what is to be > gained? Appreciate any feed back you can offer on this guys. Thanks > George Spring rv-4 4375J > Chester, Conn. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Weiler" <doug.weiler(at)pressenter.com>
Subject: Oil out breather
Date: Nov 11, 2001
Fellow Listers: Just want to thank those that added their thoughts on my oil breather problem. Over the weekend, I disconnected all the hoses on the Christen system and cleaned out the air/oil canister (it was full of a lot of "glop"). Checked the compression and that was fine. Put it all back together and the problem seems solved. The moral is that the Christen air/oil separator needs to be cleaned once in a while (mine had not been cleaned since new, 8 years and 600 hours ago). ================ Doug Weiler Hudson, WI 715-386-1239 dougweil(at)pressenter.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dan Checkoway" <dan(at)rvproject.com>
Subject: Re: Trim Cable Cover?
Date: Nov 11, 2001
I dimpled both the bracket and plate. Works fine for me. (RV-7) In the whole RV-7 emp kit, I don't recall having to machine countersink anything other than the thick aluminum stiffeners and the elevator skin and trim tab hinge. Everything else was pretty much dimple city. 8 ) )_( Dan dan(at)rvproject.com http://www.rvproject.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bobby Hester" <bhester(at)apex.net> Subject: RV-List: Trim Cable Cover? > > About to close up the left elevator. I have the trim reinforcing bracket > riveted to the skin I am ready to install the K1100-06 nutplates. Now > the question - Do I countersink or dimple the screw hole in the > reinforcing bracket, what about the cover plate counter sink or dimple. > > I am thinking I should countersink the bracket and dimple the plate. > What have you guys done? > > I also have 7 small K1000 nutplates and small gold tone (may be > brass)round head screws, that I have not figured out where they go, > anyone know? > > -- > Surfing the Web from Hopkinsville, KY > Visit my web site at: http://www.geocities.com/hester-hoptown/RVSite/ > Finishing RV7A empannage :-) > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bowen" <Larry(at)bowenaero.com>
Subject: 8 fwd belly skins?
Date: Nov 11, 2001
I'm a little confused about the RV-8 fwd belly skins, where they attach to the firewall. The F851 skins, the ones on each side of the cooling ramp, rivet to the very bottom of the firewall. The plans indicate to dimple and rivet while doing the rest of belly skins. The video explicitly confirms this. BUT, isn't there a short piece of hinge that goes in that area for the cowling? Won't the dimple and the rivet itself get in the way? The stuff seems too thin to countersink. What to do? Thx, Larry Bowen RV-8 fuse Email: Larry(at)BowenAero.com Web: http://BowenAero.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Folbrecht" <paul.folbrecht(at)pobox.com>
Subject: RV9 builders
Date: Nov 11, 2001
I have been going back and forth between an RV9A and a Zenith Zodiac XL for some time and am having a devil of a time making up my mind. If anybody would like to try to woo me to the RV (offlist)- and put up with some questions- I'll be listening. -Paul paul.folbrecht(at)pobox.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rv6238(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 11, 2001
Subject: Bendix mixture lever
Have had to fabricate a new mixture control lever on a Bendix injector. This had to be done to clear the fab airbox. Although I am confident that my new lever will be fine one cannot help but wonder what would happen if the mixture lever on the injector were to become disconnected during flight. Anyone have any idea? Thanks, Bill Griffin, Reisterstown, MD RV-6 IO320 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gene Smith" <esmith6(at)satx.rr.com>
Subject: Need tail wheel spring, U-402.
Date: Nov 11, 2001
Removing 360 swivel tail wheel, going back to the original nonswivel (30*) U-402 tailwheel assy......Anyone out there have one for sale (Van doesn't carry them anymore!). Thanks. esmith6(at)satx.rr.com 210-494-1495. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MeangreenRV4(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Subject: Re: RV-List Long gear VS short gear
In a message dated 11/11/2001 7:30:10 AM Pacific Standard Time, SSPRING83(at)aol.com writes: > Can any of you guys tell me what the advantage is of the long gear on a > rv4 vs the short gear? You said it....long gear better prop clearance, especially if you have a constant speed prop. I have noticed no deference in the view out of the canopy. Tim Barnes N39TB ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 12, 2001
From: Greg Hunsicker <gh2538(at)cjnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: RV4-List: Need tail wheel spring, U-402.
Just for my own knowledge, why would you do away with the 360 swivel? Gene Smith wrote: > --> RV4-List message posted by: "Gene Smith" > > Removing 360 swivel tail wheel, going back to the original nonswivel > (30*) U-402 tailwheel assy......Anyone out there have one for sale (Van > doesn't carry them anymore!). Thanks. esmith6(at)satx.rr.com > 210-494-1495. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Albert Gardner" <albert.gardner(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: RV9 builders
Date: Nov 12, 2001
I also started out on a Zenith 601HDS. I thought the plans and factory support were very good. One major difference between the two kits is build time and total price since many Zenith planes use the Rotax engines. I switched because I thought I would someday forget about all the hours of labor (which is more fun than work) and the extra expense when I ended up with what promises to be a really great aircraft. Albert Gardner Yuma, AZ RV-9A: N872RV (Reserved) Working on canopy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Folbrecht" <paul.folbrecht(at)pobox.com> > I have been going back and forth between an RV9A and a Zenith Zodiac XL > for some time and am having a devil of a time making up my mind. If ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: Re: 8 fwd belly skins?
Date: Nov 12, 2001
> I'm a little confused about the RV-8 fwd belly skins, where they attach to > the firewall. The F851 skins, the ones on each side of the cooling ramp, > rivet to the very bottom of the firewall. The plans indicate to dimple and > rivet while doing the rest of belly skins. The video explicitly confirms > this. BUT, isn't there a short piece of hinge that goes in that area for > the cowling? Won't the dimple and the rivet itself get in the way? The > stuff seems too thin to countersink. What to do? > > Thx, > > Larry Bowen > RV-8 fuse Larry, DON'T rivet that yet, just leave it clecoed, and that goes for the entire firewall perimeter. Good call on asking, and you're correct, you need to include either the cowling hinge or the plate for Camlocks. Randy Lervold RV-8 #80500, 137 hrs www.rv-8.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Michael J. Robbins" <kitfox(at)gte.net>
Subject: Re: Canopy Screws
Date: Nov 12, 2001
A word of caution. I used screws (#6) on my canopy, which I finished a year ago, and I have many small cracks (26 at last count) around the canopy frame. And mine isn't in service yet. The screws are about a half turn more than finger tight. Sure would seem like a lot less pressure than rivets. Mike Robbins RV8Q 80591 N88MJ engine stuff ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: Canopy Screws
Date: Nov 12, 2001
There are a couple of things to try to prevent cracks from holes. One, Is to slightly bevel the hole. The other is to solvent polish the hole. You need to be very careful with this procedure so the solvent doesn't get on the rest of the canopy, just the interior of the hole. A fine brush can dab the solvent on the hole. Insert when the hole is vertical from the bottom so that any excess will stay on the brush. Both these procedures minimize the stress risers by polishing the hole and minimizing sharp edges. Remember you need over size holes as the plastic expands and contracts due to temperature. Cy Galley, TC - Chair, Emergency Aircraft Repair, Oshkosh Editor, EAA Safety Programs cgalley(at)qcbc.org or experimenter(at)eaa.org http://www.eaa.org for latest flying rules Always looking for articles for the Experimenter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael J. Robbins" <kitfox(at)gte.net> Subject: Re: RV-List: Canopy Screws A word of caution. I used screws (#6) on my canopy, which I finished a year ago, and I have many small cracks (26 at last count) around the canopy frame. And mine isn't in service yet. The screws are about a half turn more than finger tight. Sure would seem like a lot less pressure than rivets. Mike Robbins RV8Q 80591 N88MJ engine stuff ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6bldr(at)home.com>
Subject: Re: Canopy Screws
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Mike, Were the holes for the #6 screws in the canopy drilled to 5/16 and countersunk? This allows for movement due to temperature fluctuations. Jerry Calvert Edmond Ok -6 ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael J. Robbins <kitfox(at)gte.net> Subject: Re: RV-List: Canopy Screws > > A word of caution. I used screws (#6) on my canopy, which I finished a year > ago, and I have many small cracks (26 at last count) around the canopy > frame. And mine isn't in service yet. The screws are about a half turn > more than finger tight. Sure would seem like a lot less pressure than > rivets. > > Mike Robbins > RV8Q 80591 N88MJ engine stuff > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Planejoel(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Subject: RV4 Air scoop/Box
A friend of mine has been building an RV4 IO320 D2A. Has most of the plane finished, HOWEVER when he fitted his cowl the air box was not on. Cowl fits great without the airbox on. With the airbox on it appears the bottom scoop of the cow needs to be completly redone. It appears the IO airbox drops down lower then a regular carb Also the throttle lever on the carb touches the bottom of the cowl.. Anyway has anyone run into this problem on a RV4 with an IO engine. Possibly and after market scoop etc. Would appreciate any info he is about ready to give up the project. Joe RV6A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HCRV6(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Subject: Re: Canopy Screws
I used #6 screws with Tinnerman washers to distribute the load over a bigger area of the plexi. Try your local hardware store for Lexel. BTW I put a dab of Lexel on the screw threads to seal them. Seemed to work well, 'course I'm not flying yet. Harry Crosby Pleasanton, California RV-6, finish kit stuff ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 12, 2001
From: Jim Duckett <perfeng(at)3rivers.net>
Subject: Canopy attachment (pro-seal?)
Hey Guys, Again I'm a little slow in keeping up with the list but, here's a suggestion for the "Pro-Seal attachment" canopy issue. We all agree that Pro-Seal has to be the messiest stuff to deal with known to man. Good stuff but, messy, slow curing and in general , one of those " I'd really rather not" kind of products. Anyway, there is a product manufacture known as FUSOR. They make all types of adhesives and sealers. Primarily used in the auto industry (used to secure doors to posts, panels to structures, etc... There are different "grades" depending on the shear that it will be required to withstand (for door hinges to posts like G.M. Trucks, we use 110 as an example). It's packaged in a pre-ratio tube and has detachable mixing nozzles so you only use what you need. Cost isn't bad. If your starting out new, with buying the gun, plungers, adhesive, and a bunch of mixing nozzles you'll have about $50.00 tied up but, the gun and plungers are forever. Depending on the formula your going to use, the average set-up time is around 20 minutes. Then it's at around 80% shear strength. Full cure in 24 hours. It's paintable, won't degrade the plexi or lexan and does have some "give" to it and is stronger than the material that your bonding. Pretty sweet stuff IMHO. Jim Duckett, N708JD ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 12, 2001
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Free Copy of Van's New "THE RV STORY" Video!
Hey Listers! In support of the 2001 Email List Fund Raiser, Andy Gold of The Builder's Bookstore ( http://www.buildersbooks.com/ ) is donating a FREE COPY of the new edition of Van's "The RV Story" video (VHS) to any Email List Member making a Contribution of $50 or more! To take advantage of this wonderful Offer, please include the following information along with your Contribution, either in the Message Box if you Contribute on-line, or on a slip of paper if your Contribution is by check via the USMail: Van's RV Story Video Offer $50 or Greater Contributor [your name] [your shipping address] [your City, State and Zip Code] If you've already made a Contribution in 2001 of $50 or more and would like to receive the video, please drop me an email ( dralle(at)matronics.com ) and include the information shown above with the words "Video Offer" in the Subject line. Please note that this new edition of "The RV Story" will first be available in about 8 weeks. I want to thank Andy Gold and the Builder's Book Store for this *very generous* Contribution! If you haven't taken a moment to check out The Builder's Book Store web site yet, you owe it to yourself to have a look ( http://www.buildersbooks.com/ ). Andy has a fabulous selection of interesting, informative, and exceptionally useful books and videos on his site. Please have a look! Again, I would like to thank everyone that has so generously made a Contribution so far in this year's List Fund Raiser! Your Contributions make all of the Lists and Services found here possible - period. Thank you! Matt Dralle Email List Administrator ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Subject: Updated Email List Photo Share Available!
RV6-List(at)matronics.com, RV7-List(at)matronics.com
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
An Update to the Email List Photo Share below is available: Subject: Fuselage Roller http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/kdbrv8r@charter.net/index.html --------------------------------- EMAIL LIST PHOTO SHARE Share your files and photos with other List members simply by emailing the files to: pictures(at)matronics.com Please view the typical Share above and include the Description Text Fields as shown along with your submission of files and photos. --------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HCRV6(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Subject: Master Contactor Connections
This seems like a really dumb problem but I find that the battery terminal studs on my master relay (from Van's) are so short that I can barely get one fat wire terminal on and still have threads enough to get a lock washer and thin brass nut on. There is not enough length to even get a thin diode ring terminal on there, let alone a connection to the essential bus. Has anyone else run into this, and if so, how did you solve it? I'm thinking about one or the other following solutions. 1) The studs are retained in the relay case with a thick nut and a captive cup shaped washer, so I could disassemble the nut and cup washer and replace the existing nut with a much thinner brass nut. 2) I could install an intermediate terminal post like connection, like a big brass bolt, insulated from ground of course, between the battery and the battery terminal on the master relay where I could make the other necessary connections. Any better ideas will be much appreciated. Harry Crosby Pleasanton, California RV-6, finish kit stuff ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 12, 2001
From: Garry LeGare <"versadek"@earthlink.net>
Subject: In line fuel filter behavior in cold conditions.
Last week Roger Embree had a good question as to whether ice crystals would pass thru the in line filters I have been using. I answered in my post that they wouldn't, nor would they plug the filter itself unless there was a lot of them. This got me thinking; could the filter medium itself become saturated with water and stop the flow of gas when it got cold enough to freeze. To settle my mind, I performed the following test; I have a Wix model 33003, Clear body, inline fuel filter that has been sitting almost continuously (only taken out for testing) in a sealed jar of water since 4/27/99. I removed the filter from the jar, let the water drain out of it for 5 seconds, poured the water out of the jar, dropped the filter back in and filled the jar with 100LL. This was put in my freezer ( 18 degrees F) and left over the weekend. This morning I removed the jar from the freezer, and using tongs, lifted the filter out of the jar, being sure to lift in such a way as to cause the gas to flow through thru the element to drain out of the filter. This was done five times in rapid secession, so the filter would stay as cold as possible. Each time the fuel flowed out of the filter in a few seconds. My conclusion; If the filter element does absorb water, the amount is so small, that when the temperatures are below freezing, it has little effect on filter performance. This is also the conclusion of the engineer at Wix that I talked to. Garry "Casper" ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 12, 2001
From: KAKlewin(at)aol.com
Subject: Re: Canopy Screws
Norman, I used #6 screws and the smaller #6 tinnerman washers. You will find that the hole in the plexi has to be fairly oversized (I think mine are about 5/8in) and the washer helps distribute some of the tension of the screw in that large of a hole. Additionally, I also put a tinnerman #6 washer between the plexi and frame (upside down) on the bottom of the plexi. Most of this information I got from the 18 yrs of the RVator on using screws for the canopy. Seems to work well, Kurt in OKC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ross A. Scroggs" <rscroggs(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Rudder Attachment on RV-4
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Got a question for the RV-4 experts! I'm trying to attach my rudder to the VS. I've set the rod end bearings to 13/16" gap as shown on the elevator to HS drawings, haven't found the deminsions for the rudder to VS. The two top bearings can be set, but the longer bearing on the bottom can't be screwed in that deep. The longer rod end isn't threaded as far down the shaft as the shorter bearings. My question, what is the correct setting for the rudder rod end bearings? Can I just thread the lower bearing in as deep as it will go and just line up the two upper bearings to match? This has to have been seen before but there isn't anything in the archives. Thanks in advance, Ross Scroggs Conyers, Ga. RV-4 #3911 EMP. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Glenn & Judi" <dirtyrottenscoundrels(at)home.com>
Subject: Adequate Carb heat?
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Here is an NTSB accident synopses from a 1999 RV-6A accident. Please note the probable cause as stated by the NTSB includes inadequate carburetor heat shroud design. Does anyone know if this has been addressed by Van's as they are still using a 2" Diameter Tube as their carb heat system? Has anyone flying had any trouble with their carb heat system as being inadequate? Thanks, Glenn Gordon NTSB Identification: DEN99LA062 . The docket is stored in the (offline) NTSB Imaging System. Accident occurred Thursday, April 01, 1999 at PAYSON, UT Aircraft:Sly RV-6A, registration: N80287 Injuries: 2 Uninjured. After being airborne for 15 minutes, the aircraft's engine began to lose power. The pilot initiated an emergency landing along a county road but switched to another road to avoid power lines. Upon touchdown, the aircraft departed the side of the road and struck a fence post. The engine was examined and test run, and no discrepancies were observed. The pilot stated that 'other pilots at the scene agreed the conditions could cause carburetor icing.' According to the FAA inspector present at the accident scene, 'the conditions were a classic setup for carburetor icing.' The Van's Aircraft construction and operating manual states that one method of building the carburetor heat system is to 'run a 2-inch air hose from a heat muff and position it to feed into the alternative air inlet of the carb[uretor] air box,' which is the method by which the pilot constructed the airplane. According to the inspector, the 2-inch hose is not large enough to adequately supply enough heat to the carburetor to sufficiently melt the ice. The aircraft was issued an airworthiness certificate by the FAA on August 24, 1995. The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows. The development of carburetor ice resulting in a loss of engine power, and the inadequate carburetor heat shroud. Factors were the carburetor icing weather conditions, the kit manufacturer's inadequate carburetor heat shroud design, the FAA's inadequate certification of the aircraft, the snow covered, unsuitable terrain on which to perform a forced landing, and the fence post. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Kloos" <jim.kloos(at)virgin.net>
Subject: RV4 scoop
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Simple,cut off the old scoop and bond on a new 360 scoop from Van's.Keep the 320 FAB to give extra clearence for levers/exhausts etc. Jim Kloos RV4 UK. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: FLYBOYRV4(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Subject: Re: RV4-List: Need tail wheel spring, U-402.
Gene, Why do you want to get rid of the 360 tail wheel assy? Is it because it has no authority on rollout for directional control? I had that problem when I changed over to the 360 so I had a buddy of mine mill out the travel journals that increased the angle before it would let the wheel swivel freely. Take it apart and you will see how this would work. When I first installed it it unnerved me just during taxi when it would snap into the swivel mode way too soon. Hope this helps. Jim Mandeville RV4 Ser # 111 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ABAYMAN(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Subject: spinner template
dear listers thanks to one of our listers ( Tom Barnes )who took my copy of the spinner template and scanned it into a jpeg file for me, i have cleaned it up quite a bit in the paint program. those of you who have received a copy earlier, i can send you a much cleaner picture now. respond off list and i will attach a copy to an e-mail to anyone who needs a copy. thanks scott tampa ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ABAYMAN(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Subject: spinner template on the web
listers, rather than e-mailing to everyone, i have put it on doug's photo album page, under scott rv6a clean spinner or see the link below. http://photos.groups.yahoo.com/group/vansairforce/lst?& .dir=/Scott+Reviere%27RV-6A&.src=gr&.view=t&.last=1 hope it helps scott tampa ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Joe Hine" <joehine(at)nbnet.nb.ca>
Subject: Re: RV4 Air scoop/Box
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Joe Tell him its hopeless..............I'll take the project off his hands for 5 grand or so.....just to help out. Joe Hine RV4 C-FYTQ > > A friend of mine has been building an RV4 IO320 D2A. Has most of the plane > finished, HOWEVER when he fitted his cowl the air box was not on. Cowl fits > great without the airbox on. With the airbox on it appears the bottom scoop > of the cow needs to be completly redone. It appears the IO airbox drops down > lower then a regular carb Also the throttle lever on the carb touches the > bottom of the cowl.. Anyway has anyone run into this problem on a RV4 with an > IO engine. Possibly and after market scoop etc. Would appreciate any info he > is about ready to give up the project. > > Joe > RV6A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HCRV6(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Subject: Re: Canopy Screws
In a message dated 11/12/01 1:12:16 PM Pacific Standard Time, rickjory(at)msn.com writes: << I missed the thread (other than someone asking where to get Lexel). What does one use Lexel for? Thanks in advance, Rick Jory >> Lexel is a clear paintable sealant that seems to be compatible with Lexan plexi as an alternative to Pro Seal or the RTVs. I used it and so far I'm very happy with the results. I also found that it cleans up very nicely with mineral spirits paint thinner. One tube did my slider canopy with lots left over. Harry Crosby Pleasanton, California RV-6, finish kit stuff ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Greg & Cindy Tanner" <gtanner(at)bendcable.com>
Subject: Canopy Screws
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Here's more info on Lexel. Sounds like good stuff. Greg http://www.sashcosealants.com/htmlfiles/lexel.html -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of HCRV6(at)aol.com Subject: Re: RV-List: Canopy Screws In a message dated 11/12/01 1:12:16 PM Pacific Standard Time, rickjory(at)msn.com writes: << I missed the thread (other than someone asking where to get Lexel). What does one use Lexel for? Thanks in advance, Rick Jory >> ====================================================================== ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rv6238(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Subject: Re: RV4 Air scoop/Box
I had the same problem. Really it is not a problem at all, just a bit more work. Cut off the existing scoop. Then re-bond it to the cowl bottom using simple aluminum brackets to hold the scoop in the position needed. Use glass cloth and epoxy to reattach. Microballoon and epoxy to blend in the new seem. My 6 manual provided pretty good instructions on the procedure. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Sharon & Darryl DuRossette" <durosset(at)fidnet.com>
Subject: spinner template on the web
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Scott, I keep getting asked for a login ID and password by yahoo...is that the right URL or do you have to have a ID and password to see it? Darryl DuRossette KR1 @ MO1 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of ABAYMAN(at)aol.com Subject: RV-List: spinner template on the web listers, rather than e-mailing to everyone, i have put it on doug's photo album page, under scott rv6a clean spinner or see the link below. http://photos.groups.yahoo.com/group/vansairforce/lst?& .dir=/Scott+Reviere%27RV-6A&.src=gr&.view=t&.last=1 hope it helps scott tampa ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bowen" <Larry(at)bowenaero.com>
Subject: 8 fwd belly skins?
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Thanks Randy - As it stands now, the skins is dimpled, but the firewall is not. How do things finally end up in that regard? Should I 'undimple' the skin or dimple the firewall? Larry Bowen Email: Larry(at)BowenAero.com Web: http://BowenAero.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Randy Lervold > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 11:19 AM > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: 8 fwd belly skins? > > > > I'm a little confused about the RV-8 fwd belly skins, where > they attach to > > the firewall. The F851 skins, the ones on each side of the > cooling ramp, > > rivet to the very bottom of the firewall. The plans indicate to dimple > and > > rivet while doing the rest of belly skins. The video > explicitly confirms > > this. BUT, isn't there a short piece of hinge that goes in > that area for > > the cowling? Won't the dimple and the rivet itself get in the > way? The > > stuff seems too thin to countersink. What to do? > > > > Thx, > > > > Larry Bowen > > RV-8 fuse > > > Larry, DON'T rivet that yet, just leave it clecoed, and that goes for the > entire firewall perimeter. Good call on asking, and you're > correct, you need > to include either the cowling hinge or the plate for Camlocks. > > Randy Lervold > RV-8 #80500, 137 hrs > www.rv-8.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Mack" <don(at)dmack.net>
Subject: Re: spinner template
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Scott, Please reply with the template. Just beginning work on the spinner. Thanks Don Mack don(at)dmack.net ----- Original Message ----- From: <ABAYMAN(at)aol.com> Subject: RV-List: spinner template > > dear listers > thanks to one of our listers ( Tom Barnes )who took my copy of the spinner > template and scanned it into a jpeg file for me, i have cleaned it up quite a > bit in the paint program. those of you who have received a copy earlier, i > can send you a much cleaner picture now. respond off list and i will attach a > copy to an e-mail to anyone who needs a copy. > thanks > scott > tampa > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Nellis" <mnellis(at)peoplepc.com>
Subject: Re: Rudder Attachment on RV-4
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Ross, While I'm building a -6 instead of a 4, on my drawing 6pp my plans show a dimension of 2.5" between the rudder spar and the VS spar. The way I set the initial distance was to set the top rod bearing and bottom rod bearings to obtain the 2.5" distance then just screwed the middle rod bearing in until it lined up. This can be a hassle because you have to take the rudder on and off several times and the bolts can be tough to get to. Take some advice that was passed along to me many moons ago. Set the top and bottom rod bearings to get the distance you need then run a string between the top and bottom bearing and use a string to set the middle bearing. You'll only need to take the rudder off once or twice to get the final adjustment. This saved me a whole bunch of time and aggravation. Ultimately, you'll want to set the distance to whatever it takes to get the appropriate rudder travel without hitting the VS. Mike Nellis - http://bmnellis.com Plainfield, IL RV6 N699BM Reserved Mounting Control Surfaces Stinson 108-2 N9666K ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ross A. Scroggs" <rscroggs(at)worldnet.att.net> Subject: RV-List: Rudder Attachment on RV-4 > > Got a question for the RV-4 experts! > > I'm trying to attach my rudder to the VS. I've set the rod end > bearings to 13/16" gap as shown on the elevator to HS > drawings, haven't found the deminsions for the rudder to VS. The two > top bearings can be set, but the longer bearing > on the bottom can't be screwed in that deep. The longer rod end isn't > threaded as far down the shaft as the shorter bearings. > My question, what is the correct setting for the rudder rod end > bearings? Can I just thread the lower bearing in as > deep as it will go and just line up the two upper bearings to match? > This has to have been seen before but there isn't anything in the > archives. > > Thanks in advance, > > Ross Scroggs > Conyers, Ga. > RV-4 #3911 EMP. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Folbrecht" <paul.folbrecht(at)pobox.com>
Subject: Re: RV9 Builders
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Thanks very much for all the responses I got, on and off the list. They were generally a reinforcement of what I've heard: Van's quality is unsurpassed, performance numbers are right on, Zenith exaggerates their numbers, etc. Never been any doubt in my mind as to which is the better plane, or has the better price/performance ratio. But I still very much like to hear the firsthand experiences of builders and fliers. (Else for one thing I may have assumed Zenith's airspeed numbers were correct..) Two things have held me back from declaring the RV9 a no-brainer: 1) Total cost. 2) Build time. Regarding cost: When I starting looking at kitplanes I decided $30K was my budget. I realize now it will take a bit more than that, but I do need to keep it under $35K. That ought to be doable with a VFR panel and either a used O235 or an Eggenfellner Sub. (I probably don't have the kind of disposable income the average RV builder does. I make a good living but I'm only 31.) Adding to the cost difference is the fact that the Van's factory is much further from me, so picking up the kit is not an option. (I have yet to look into what freight will cost (to Milwaukee).. gotta be at least $1,000 I would guess.) Another $1K or so for tools that I wouldn't need for a Zodiac. Anyway, all told I figured an RV would end up costing me at least $5K more than the Zodiac, even though the kit prices are nearly identical. Build time: You hear so many things regarding build time when you first start looking at kitplanes you don't know what to think. Some people say factory estimates are reasonable, some say quadruple them at least. I think I've now heard from enough RV9 builders to conclude that 1200-1400 hours total time is doable for a first-time builder, which is just what the factory says. I'm talking about a basic VFR aircraft with few or no mods. So, I think I can live with that. I originally wanted something I could build in six-nine months but hell there is really no reason at all to rush something like this, I figure. This is what really drew me to the Zodiac- 400 hours the factory says. I think in reality the gap between the Zodiac and the new matched hole RV kits is much smaller than a factor of three. After all all the finishing- panel, FWF, painting, etc., is the same either way. Again, thanks for all the responses. I feel I've largely made up my mind, even if it means waiting longer for an airplane. I'll be lurking here. -Paul P.S. I started a new thread because I could not figure out how to reply to a list message. I am using the web interface. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ABAYMAN(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Subject: Re: spinner template
see attached ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Folbrecht" <paul.folbrecht(at)pobox.com>
Subject: by the way..
Date: Nov 12, 2001
I'm in the Milwaukee area if anybody would like to offer me a ride. :-) (I do *not* yet have my PPL nor have I soloed.. just looking for a demo ride with a little stick time at altitude.) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 12, 2001
From: barry pote <barrypote(at)home.com>
Subject: control stick material
Has anyone given thought to using an aluminum tube for the control stick? Why does Van use a big heavy steel tube? I would call Van's and ask, but I am over my 'dumb question' limit this month. Barry Pote RV9a fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Folbrecht" <paul.folbrecht(at)pobox.com>
Subject: question re: rv9 vs. zodiac performance
Date: Nov 12, 2001
For discussion's sake, looking at the two aircraft, I have to wonder exactly what is responsible for the large gap in cruise speed. An RV9A outweighs a Zodiac XL empty by at least 300lb yet cruises at least 50 mph faster with the same O235. The RV obviously has a cleaner airframe, expecially considering that fat Zodiac airfoil, but, it just doesn't look that much cleaner to me, though I'm no aeronautical engineer. What gives? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Folbrecht" <paul.folbrecht(at)pobox.com>
Subject: FWF accessories & instruments/avionics
Date: Nov 12, 2001
I know they include the mount with the kit but there is no FWF kit for an O235 or any other engine apparantly sold by Van's. As a first-time builder I would certainly like to be able to purchase a complete FWF kit instead of buying components here and there and needing to take probably a heck of a lot more time getting things setup right. Does anybody else offer FWF kits for RVs? If not about how much $ does everything you need typically run? One more thing: I'd be really interested in hearing about some "sample" RV panels. VFR only really. What have you got exactly and what did you spend? Offlist if you feel it appropriate. (I will also be checking out as many builders' sites as I can in the near future...) Ok, that's it for tonight. :-) I hope I'm not starting to get annoying already. :-) If/when I build an RV I'll be sure to give back to this list as much as I can. -Paul ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Persyk" <dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: control stick material
Date: Nov 12, 2001
An out-of-trim go around in a 6A requires about 30 pounds-force exerted through a 17-inch moment arm. You can run the load equations for yourself. I've never questioned Van's engineering. Dennis Persyk N600DP 107 Hours Hampshire, IL ----- Original Message ----- From: "barry pote" <barrypote(at)home.com> Subject: RV-List: control stick material > > Has anyone given thought to using an aluminum tube for the control > stick? Why does Van use a big heavy steel tube? > > I would call Van's and ask, but I am over my 'dumb question' limit this > month. > > Barry Pote RV9a fuselage > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Brick" <jbrick(at)wolfenet.com>
Subject: Rudder Attachment on RV-4
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Ross, I don't know the correct settings but my bottom and top rod bearings measure 29/32 and the middle one measures 1 inch. They line up. Looks like I just ran the bottom one in almost as far as possible and made the rest line up. John Brick Tacoma RV-4 Electrical -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Ross A. Scroggs Subject: RV-List: Rudder Attachment on RV-4 Got a question for the RV-4 experts! I'm trying to attach my rudder to the VS. I've set the rod end bearings to 13/16" gap as shown on the elevator to HS drawings, haven't found the deminsions for the rudder to VS. The two top bearings can be set, but the longer bearing on the bottom can't be screwed in that deep. The longer rod end isn't threaded as far down the shaft as the shorter bearings. My question, what is the correct setting for the rudder rod end bearings? Can I just thread the lower bearing in as deep as it will go and just line up the two upper bearings to match? This has to have been seen before but there isn't anything in the archives. Thanks in advance, Ross Scroggs Conyers, Ga. RV-4 #3911 EMP. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: Re: 8 fwd belly skins?
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Nope, dimple everything, but again keep clecos in 100% of the holes to keep everything lined up until you rivet it with the hinge or camlock plate. Randy > Thanks Randy - As it stands now, the skins is dimpled, but the firewall is > not. How do things finally end up in that regard? Should I 'undimple' the > skin or dimple the firewall? > > Larry Bowen > Email: Larry(at)BowenAero.com > Web: http://BowenAero.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Randy Lervold > > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 11:19 AM > > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > > Subject: Re: RV-List: 8 fwd belly skins? > > > > > > > > > I'm a little confused about the RV-8 fwd belly skins, where > > they attach to > > > the firewall. The F851 skins, the ones on each side of the > > cooling ramp, > > > rivet to the very bottom of the firewall. The plans indicate to dimple > > and > > > rivet while doing the rest of belly skins. The video > > explicitly confirms > > > this. BUT, isn't there a short piece of hinge that goes in > > that area for > > > the cowling? Won't the dimple and the rivet itself get in the > > way? The > > > stuff seems too thin to countersink. What to do? > > > > > > Thx, > > > > > > Larry Bowen > > > RV-8 fuse > > > > > > Larry, DON'T rivet that yet, just leave it clecoed, and that goes for the > > entire firewall perimeter. Good call on asking, and you're > > correct, you need > > to include either the cowling hinge or the plate for Camlocks. > > > > Randy Lervold > > RV-8 #80500, 137 hrs > > www.rv-8.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HCRV6(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 13, 2001
Subject: Re: spinner template
Scott: Is your template for CS or FP? Harry Crosby Pleasanton, California RV-6, finish kit stuff ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Michael J. Robbins" <kitfox(at)gte.net>
Subject: Re: Canopy Screws
Date: Nov 12, 2001
----- Original Messages ----- From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6bldr(at)home.com> > > Were the holes for the #6 screws in the canopy drilled to 5/16 and > countersunk? This allows for movement due to temperature fluctuations. > Would you recommend the screws only be tightened to snug? The holes were drilled to 3/16 with a unibit then slightly beveled to remove sharp edges. I didn't do the solvent thing as never heard of that. I would recommend not tightening much past snug. I talked to Gus at Van's who had the same problem with his RV-6. He said they did not propagate much more than a half inch or so then stopped. He didn't stop drill any of the cracks. I did. Mike Robbins RV8Q ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "George McNutt" <gmcnutt(at)intergate.ca>
Subject: Lexel
Date: Nov 12, 2001
Can't find Lexel at home depot, no Ace Hardware stores in this area. Any Canadian listers know where to get this stuff? Norman Hunger Hi Norman I used Lexel several years ago to seal along the top of a Cessna windshield, if I remember correctly I purchased it at a motor home parts dept. in Surrey. Check around, it's not a rare product. Contrary to the other reports I have read on this List I wasn't particurarly impressed, it is not a wonder product. Probably has better holding power than silicon sealant but in my opinion is not nearly as good as pro-seal for sealing the canopy. George McNutt Langley, B.C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "KostaLewis" <mikel(at)dimensional.com>
Subject: Re: Stick grips again
Date: Nov 13, 2001
> I too wish that there was another alternative. The Affinity grips look > good > > but I think are overpriced............. > > There's the thing about spending more money, most times you get what you pay > for. If you had bought the Infinity grips you would not be disappointed with > the quality. Heartily agreed. I got interested in the grips when they were first being developed and had a distant view of the process that brought about the grips he sells today. He went through several designs and plastics as well as manufacturers before he landed on a product he was satisfied with. Only then would he let them out on the market. Get 'em; you'll love 'em. Michael ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "George McNutt" <gmcnutt(at)intergate.ca>
Subject: RV8 Cowl Trimming & Attach
Date: Nov 13, 2001
For those of yo who have already done it, how did you trim the upper and lower cowl halves (the horizontal line) to fit each other nicely? I've got the upper and lower pieces trimmed and fit to the fuselage just fine but the best way to trim and fit them to each other escapes me. Thanks in advance. -Don RV8 NJ Hi Don Not sure of this is the info you want but not seeing any other answers I will give it a try. The newer style cowl has an overlap for those that want to use screws or Camlock type fastners. If using hinge type fastners you want a nice straight butt joint. I used a straight piece of wood about twenty inches long (1 X 4) and glued sandpaper to it, then sanded the cowl sides down to get a nice fit. It is not perfect but a reasonably good fit. George McNutt Langley, B.C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "George McNutt" <gmcnutt(at)intergate.ca>