RV-Archive.digest.vol-mo

March 17, 2002 - March 21, 2002



      and I bought one for $39.  It has an automatic switch from charge to trickle. 
       I just used it and it worked great.
      
      Len Leggette RV-8A
      N901LL (res)
      Greensboro, N.C.
      Hanger # 23 at INT
      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: Repairman Certificate for New RV Owner
Date: Mar 17, 2002
"The new owner may perform any work a Owner or Pilot is allowed to do per the FAR's -:" Don Eaves. Since an experimental is not TCed, anyone can work on anything. The problem with the non-builder, he must get the work approved as airworthy at the annual conditional inspection. Cy Galley, TC - Chair, Emergency Aircraft Repair, Oshkosh Editor, EAA Safety Programs cgalley(at)qcbc.org or experimenter(at)eaa.org Always looking for articles for the Experimenter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Eaves" <doneaves(at)midsouth.rr.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: Repairman Certificate for New RV Owner The new owner may perform any work a Owner or Pilot is allowed to do per the FAR's - The new owner may not sign for the condition inspection or maintenance - He does not hold the Repairman Certificate You can sign for the condition inspection or maintenance - You will be responsible for his work - An A&P may also sign for the condition inspection or maintenance - Don Eaves RV6 Flying 101+ Hours Technical Counselor - A&P Don Eaves doneaves(at)midsouth.rr.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Besing" <azpilot(at)extremezone.com> Subject: RV-List: Repairman Certificate for New RV Owner > > Since I recently sold my RV, does the new owner have to have me or an > A&P sign off on any work or condition inspection that he does? > > Das Fed? > > Paul Besing > RV-6A Sold > http://www.lacodeworks.com/besing > Kitlog Pro Builder's Log Software > http://www.kitlog.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Glenn & Judi" <dirtyrottenscoundrels(at)attbi.com>
Subject: Solution - Tip-up Canopy Chatter
Date: Mar 17, 2002
To fix my canopy chatter I ended up elongating the holes on the hold down attachment. This pulls the canopy slightly tighter but not so tight that it pulls the canopy against the roll bar. It is more like I simply took the slp out of the system. My second choice would have been to put some adjustable rubber bumpers on the underside of the back corners of the canopy. I didn't need to go that far, but it might work for someone else. -Glenn Gordon N442E 3 fun filled hours! :-D ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Glenn & Judi" <dirtyrottenscoundrels(at)attbi.com>
Subject: New Engine Break-in.
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Hi, I just started flying my RV-6 with a factory new O-360. I am currently running Aeroshell 65 mineral oil in it. 3 questions: 1. Should I wait till 10 or 25 hours for my first oil change? I will be using Aeroshell 65 Mineral oil for the first 50 hours or until the oil consumption stabilizes. 2. I will be running the engine hard for a while. How much do I need to limit my practice of takeoffs and landings while at the same time providing for proper engine break in? 3. What type of altitude or leaning restrictions should I be using during the break in period? Thanks, Glenn Gordon N442E, (3 Hours) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tim Lewis" <timrv6a(at)earthlink.net>
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Subject: Re: Repairman Certificate for New RV Owner
> The new owner may perform any work a Owner or Pilot is allowed to do > per the FAR's - The new owner may not sign for the condition > inspection or maintenance - He does not hold the Repairman Certificate > You can sign for the condition inspection or maintenance - You will be > responsible for his work - An A&P may also sign for the condition > inspection or maintenance - Not quite 100% correct. Per the stock experiemental operating limitation (paragraph 23 in mine, others may vary), only the repairman certificate holder or an A&P may sign the condition inspection. ANYBODY can do maintenance work on an experimental. To verify this, see FAR 43.1b, which says the FAR 43 rules don't apply to experiementals. Thus the FAR 43 rules which restrict maintenance to A&P mechanics are not applicable to experimentals. ****** Tim Lewis -- HEF (Manassas, VA) RV-6A N47TD - First Flight 18 Dec 99 http://www.geocities.com/timrv6a ****** ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wes" <whays(at)camalott.com>
Subject: Re: charging odyssey battery
Date: Mar 17, 2002
I just picked up a couple of small "float chargers" from Harbor Freight for the riding lawnmower and bike. They maintain that they will keep the battery at full charge for long term storage. One float charger will bring the battery up to full charge and then go to the maintenance mode automatically. The other is much smaller and the battery has to be at full charge before hooking up the float charger for long term maintenance. Has anybody had any experience with these? They each were less than $20 US. I haven't hooked one up to the plane yet, but it doesn't get a chance to discharge. ;-). Wes Hays N844WB 230+ hours Winters, TX "The Laws of Aerodynamics are unforgiving and the ground is hard." Michael Collins (1987) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6(at)cox.net> Subject: RV-List: charging odyssey battery > > Odyssey batter users, > > What type of chargers are you using to return the battery to full charge > after it has been stored? My odyssey is currenty reading 12.54 volts, > which is 80% of full charge. I have been looking at the Deltran Battery > Tender and the Deltran lightweight onboard charger(which also will work > as a DC power supply). > > Jerry Calvert > Edmond Ok -6 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: charging odyssey battery
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Len, will this charger get the battery back up to 14.2 volts? Deltran has a Battery Tender Jr which is similar to what your are using. Thanks, Jerry Calvert Edmond Ok -6 ----- Original Message ----- From: <Lenleg(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: charging odyssey battery > > I went to Batteries Plus and they had a small trickle charger that they use > and I bought one for $39. It has an automatic switch from charge to trickle. > I just used it and it worked great. > > Len Leggette RV-8A > N901LL (res) > Greensboro, N.C. > Hanger # 23 at INT > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 17, 2002
From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: Repairman Certificate for New RV Owner
I guess I was thinking more of the real world......more than likely no A&P, AI, or holder of repairman's certificate is going to sign the log book for condition inspection unless they have checked the work (supervised) of the person doing the work. :-) Sam Buchanan =========================== Bruce Gray wrote: > > > No, no one needs to supervise any work done on an experimental. The > repairman, A&P, or IA is only attesting to the condition of the airplane at > the time of inspection, NOT any work done. > > Bruce > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Sam Buchanan > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: Repairman Certificate for New RV Owner > > > I think it would be more accurate to say that only the holder of the > repairman's certificate, or an A&P, or an AI can SIGN the logbook for > the condition inspection. > > Anyone could actually perform the inspection as long as it was under the > supervision of one of the above. > > Sam Buchanan > "The RV Journal http://thervjournal.com > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 17, 2002
From: Bob Haan <bhaan(at)easystreet.com>
Subject: Re: Show Grandchildren flying RV in Houston
I would like to show my Grandchildren a flying RV. We are visiting them in Houston; NE side in an area called Kingwood. We can be reached on our mobile phones, 503 720 6211 or 503 720 1132, or my son's house 281 361 3510. Or, reply this email. Thanks, Bob Sharon R. Haan email: shaan(at)easystreet.com Home Phone: 503 579-2729 Mobile Phone: 503 720-6211 RV6A finish kit ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Doug Shenk <dshenk3(at)attbi.com>
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Subject: panel dimmer size and panel compass
Anyone have the size handy of the panel dimmer that vans sells? I'm doing some final panel layout and realized that I needed to know how much space to reserve behind the panel. Is the heat generated a big deal. On a different note, does anyone have experience with SIRS panel mount compass. I like the SIRS Navigator that Van now sells but worndering about moving the compass into the panel. Any problems with position on the panel. Thanks, Doug Shenk RV-6A qb. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dennis Persyk" <dpersyk(at)worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Fuel Tank Vents
Date: Mar 17, 2002
The concern is not for siphoning the length of the coils is immaterial with regard to a siphoning action. The gas generally does not come out via siphoning. If there were siphoning, the pressure inside the tank would decrease until the pressure differential was zero, or the vent was above gas level, and little gas would be lost. Van has the up-and-over design to provide some hydrostatic pressure a head of gas to help keep the gas in the tank on a hot day after toping off. It helps a bit. I would stress making the gas system per plans period. The Physics of fuel transfer is not quite as simple as it seems and this is not an aspect of building that is tolerant of design mistakes. Dennis Persyk 6A N600DP 115 hours From: "Jim Norman" <jnorman(at)intermapsystems.com> Subject: RV-List: Fuel Tank Vents Listers... My good friend Scott (ABAYMAN) tells me the people are now running the fuel vent lines (RV-6) within the wing root only. If I understand what he is saying, they coil a length of tubing within the wing root, and then out the bottom of the wing root fairing... totally avoiding taking this tube into the fuselage up to the main longeron, forward and then down out the bottom of the fuse (behind the firewall). I have not seen this done, but it makes sense to me... the key is that there has to be enough coils so that the tube will always have some air in it so it won't siphon out some gas... Somebody please direct me... How many coils is enough? Is there a preferred place to put the little forward facing vents? Thanks, jim (possibly the highest number of mods to an RV... going to the paint shop... Finally!...) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Knicholas2(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Subject: Re: panel dimmer size and panel compass
The dimmer unit measures 2 inches X 2 inches and stands approx 3/8 inch high. Leave a couple of inches on one side so you can get the wires in. The post that sticks thru the panel is 1/4" diameter. The units are rated to handle 1.5 amps - so I have 2 on my panel. Hope this helps. Kim Nicholas Seattle RV9 - finish & wiring. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 17, 2002
From: "Tim Bryan" <tim(at)bryantechnology.com>
Subject: Repairman Certificate for New RV Owner
When a certified aircraft is modified outside an STC approved modification and then re licensed as an experimental can the owner who did the mods obtain the "repairman certificate"? If so could not a new owner of an RV make mods to the airplane and then re-license it with a new make and obtain a "repairman certificate"? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: charging odyssey battery
Date: Mar 17, 2002
The price is certainly right, but I do not know if these are compatible with the Odyssey battery. If the battery has deep disharged, these type of chargers will not bring them back to full charge. It would take more amperage, which is dependant on battery size. The PC625 and PC680 would need 6 amps from a charger output of no less than 14.2v and no greater than 15v. Once 14.5v is reached, the charger needs to drop to 13.6V and the amps drop way down to the trickle level. A battery that has not deep discharged, only needs around 1.25 amps and the same voltage requiremts previously mentioned to bring it back up to full charge. My PC680 has set for 15 months and it is down to 80% of full charge(12.54v). In this case, a 1.25amp charger of proper voltage output can easily bring it back up. There are chargers out there that appear to work, but in the long run are actually shortening the battery life. Jerry Calvert Edmond Ok -6 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wes" <whays(at)camalott.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: charging odyssey battery > > I just picked up a couple of small "float chargers" from Harbor Freight for > the riding lawnmower and bike. They maintain that they will keep the battery > at full charge for long term storage. One float charger will bring the > battery up to full charge and then go to the maintenance mode automatically. > The other is much smaller and the battery has to be at full charge before > hooking up the float charger for long term maintenance. > > Has anybody had any experience with these? They each were less than $20 US. > I haven't hooked one up to the plane yet, but it doesn't get a chance to > discharge. ;-). > > Wes Hays > N844WB > 230+ hours > Winters, TX > > "The Laws of Aerodynamics are unforgiving and the ground is hard." > Michael Collins (1987) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6(at)cox.net> > To: > Subject: RV-List: charging odyssey battery > > > > > > Odyssey batter users, > > > > What type of chargers are you using to return the battery to full charge > > after it has been stored? My odyssey is currenty reading 12.54 volts, > > which is 80% of full charge. I have been looking at the Deltran Battery > > Tender and the Deltran lightweight onboard charger(which also will work > > as a DC power supply). > > > > Jerry Calvert > > Edmond Ok -6 > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Eustace Bowhay" <ebowhay(at)jetstream.net>
Subject: Re: New Engine Break-in.
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Morning Glen & Judi: Will take a crack at answering your questions based on the Lycoming manual and past experience. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glenn & Judi" <dirtyrottenscoundrels(at)attbi.com> Subject: RV-List: New Engine Break-in. > > Hi, > I just started flying my RV-6 with a factory new O-360. I am currently > running Aeroshell 65 mineral oil in it. > The oil weights published in the manual are: Above 80 F ---SAE 60 Above 60 F ---SAE 50 Above 30 F ---SAE 40 Above 0 F ---SAE 30 Below 10 F -- SAE 20 > 3 questions: > > 1. Should I wait till 10 or 25 hours for my first oil change? I will be > using Aeroshell 65 Mineral oil for the first 50 hours or until the oil > consumption stabilizes. Your engine being new was run in at the factory and should not have any problems but I have seen on very rare occasions internal problems develope in the first hundred hours or so. It has been my practice to pull the filter at around 10 hours and cut and check for any sign that the engine is making any metal, then at every oil change. If your engine is equipped with a spin on filter I would see no reason to change oil until your regular 50 hour change. As you have done the mineral oil is a must for break-in. > > 2. I will be running the engine hard for a while. How much do I need to > limit my practice of takeoffs and landings while at the same time providing > for proper engine break in? When you say you will be running the engine hard the manual recommends 65 to 75 % for break-in and limit max continuous to 75 %. I tend to favor 75 % for the first few hours while keeping a close eye on temperatures, seems to do a better job of seating the rings. I believe that doing some takeoffs and landings during this phase is a plus as you are using some full throttle operation. I limit my full throttle operation to 1 minute and climb out at 75 %. I think the main thing is to keep the temperatures as even as you can by using higher airspeeds in the climb and getting the power well back in the circuit so as not to cool the cylinders so much on the approach. > > 3. What type of altitude or leaning restrictions should I be using during > the break in period? There would be no altitude restricions except at a hieght were you can no longer maintain 75% power. On the leaning I use full rich at any power setting above 75% and under 5000 feet. At 75% above 5000 I use peak EGT less 100-150 degrees. In cruise at 65% I use peak EGT less 50 degrees at all altitudes. This is what has worked for me over the years. Eustace Bowhay Blind Bay, B.C. > > Thanks, > Glenn Gordon > N442E, (3 Hours) > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "KostaLewis" <mikel(at)dimensional.com>
Subject: Fuel Tank Vents
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Van has the up-and-over design to provide some hydrostatic pressure a head of gas to help keep the gas in the tank on a hot day after toping off. It helps a bit. I would stress making the gas system per plans period. The Physics of fuel transfer is not quite as simple as it seems and this is not an aspect of building that is tolerant of design mistakes. Agreed. Fuel related problems are high on the list of things that go wrong with an experimental aircraft and fuel line designs are in the mix. Don't mess with a system that has been tested in about 2700 airplanes flying. "That's the way we've always done it". Yes, because it WORKS. Michael ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "C J Heitman" <cjh(at)execpc.com>
Subject: cracking pressure for a spring loaded alternate air door
Date: Mar 17, 2002
I'm doing a back-of-an-envelope calculation for an alternate air door (bypasses the filter) for my RSA injected IO320D1A using some small stainless steel torsion springs that I have laying around. Using two of these springs, I come up with a cracking pressure of about 0.8 inches Hg. Does anyone know if this is a reasonable loss of manifold pressure in case something would block the normal filtered intake? I don't want it to open prematurely to avoid sucking unfiltered air especially since my RV will be based on a turf strip. (The alternate air will have a screen to keep out anything large.) Chris Heitman Dousman WI RV-9A N94ME (reserved) airbox http://www.execpc.com/~cjh/rv9a.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Norman" <jnorman(at)intermapsystems.com>
Subject: Fuel Tank Vents
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Listers, To clarify my question which started this string... I was under the impression that the coiled vent within the wing root WAS THE NEW WAY TO DO IT FROM THE FACTORY. That they had abandoned the big loop within the fuselage. Sorry to confuse, as I guess I was not clear enough. My vent lines are already in, and they are in the standard position as provided by my plans, circa 1995. The question--rephrased-- is: Has Van's Aircraft changed their vent design from the standard (as I already have installed into my plane) to a simpler version that does not enter the fuselage? I'll be the answer to this re-phrased question is: No. I was not asking about modifying the fuel system per se. cheers!~ jim Tampa. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of KostaLewis Subject: RE: RV-List: Fuel Tank Vents Van has the up-and-over design to provide some hydrostatic pressure a head of gas to help keep the gas in the tank on a hot day after toping off. It helps a bit. I would stress making the gas system per plans period. The Physics of fuel transfer is not quite as simple as it seems and this is not an aspect of building that is tolerant of design mistakes. Agreed. Fuel related problems are high on the list of things that go wrong with an experimental aircraft and fuel line designs are in the mix. Don't mess with a system that has been tested in about 2700 airplanes flying. "That's the way we've always done it". Yes, because it WORKS. Michael ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: Repairman Certificate for New RV Owner
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Very difficult to license a Type Certificated as experimental. Even so, if you do, it has extreme limitations like 300 mile flight limitation. Only good for a year at a time and then you have to redo all the paper work. Cy Galley, TC - Chair, Emergency Aircraft Repair, Oshkosh Editor, EAA Safety Programs cgalley(at)qcbc.org or experimenter(at)eaa.org Always looking for articles for the Experimenter ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Pete Bodie" <rv6apjb(at)attbi.com>
Subject: Re: Aircraft Batteries.
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Has anybody tried the "BatteryMINDer $39.95 at www.batterymart.com ? With up to 85% of the 70 million (Battery Council International, January 98, 12 months - Nov. 95 - Oct. 96) new 12 volt storage batteries made each year, destined to die before they should, a new U. S. patent pending product has come to the rescue. BatteryMINDer Charger/Maintainer/Conditioner is the first of a new generation of "Computer-On-A-Chip" technology. It conditions "sulphated" batteries as well as automatically charging any type 12 volt storage battery without ever over-charging. Dubbed the "charger with a brain", it is believed to be the first charger of its kind to reverse the primary cause of early battery failure known as "sulphation". "Sulphation" batteries that were once considered beyond recovery can now be brought back to long-term useful condition. How BatteryMINDer solves battery problems A simple press of the button starts the fully automatic de-sulphation process. Unique patent pending PulseMode circuitry (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office assigned Patent Pending Serial #60/083,473) creates high-frequency pulses that break down the sulphated crystals. The battery is then able to reach its full level of charge, without excessive heat generation. Any 12-volt Maintenance or Maintenance-free type battery, including Gel and Deep cycle, can be left on charge for months at a time without fear of damage. Water never needs to be replaced while batteries are being maintained with BatteryMINDer as the unit never "boils out" the electrolyte. The unit plugs directly into a standard wall outlet (or extension cord) eliminating the need to disconnect the battery from its normal use location. The Underwriters Lab (UL) and CSA LISTED BatteryMINDer has both Charge/ Power On as well as Battery Condition / Polarity indicators. The unit will reject a "shorted cell" battery while ensuring a full charge to all others, including deep cycle marine, gel and maintenance free automotive. Unit comes complete with a simple to use hydrometer type battery tester, quick connect terminal assemblies and a five (5) year "no exclusions" warranty. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: Re: Aircraft Batteries.
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Yes, I bought one and use it somewhat regularly for charging and conditioning. Of course I have no idea what it's actually doing, but I sure like what I read. Perhaps someone more technically knowledgeable on this could comment as to whether it actually works. Randy Lervold RV-8 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pete Bodie" <rv6apjb(at)attbi.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: Aircraft Batteries. > > Has anybody tried the "BatteryMINDer $39.95 at www.batterymart.com ? > > With up to 85% of the 70 million (Battery Council International, January 98, > 12 months - Nov. 95 - Oct. 96) new 12 volt storage batteries made each year, > destined to die before they should, a new U. S. patent pending product has > come to the rescue. > > BatteryMINDer Charger/Maintainer/Conditioner is the first of a new > generation of "Computer-On-A-Chip" technology. It conditions "sulphated" > batteries as well as automatically charging any type 12 volt storage battery > without ever over-charging. Dubbed the "charger with a brain", it is > believed to be the first charger of its kind to reverse the primary cause of > early battery failure known as "sulphation". "Sulphation" batteries that > were once considered beyond recovery can now be brought back to long-term > useful condition. > > How BatteryMINDer solves battery problems > A simple press of the button starts the fully automatic de-sulphation > process. Unique patent pending PulseMode circuitry (U.S. Patent and > Trademark Office assigned Patent Pending Serial #60/083,473) creates > high-frequency pulses that break down the sulphated crystals. The battery is > then able to reach its full level of charge, without excessive heat > generation. Any 12-volt Maintenance or Maintenance-free type battery, > including Gel and Deep cycle, can be left on charge for months at a time > without fear of damage. Water never needs to be replaced while batteries are > being maintained with BatteryMINDer as the unit never "boils out" the > electrolyte. The unit plugs directly into a standard wall outlet (or > extension cord) eliminating the need to disconnect the battery from its > normal use location. > > The Underwriters Lab (UL) and CSA LISTED BatteryMINDer has both Charge/ > Power On as well as Battery Condition / Polarity indicators. The unit will > reject a "shorted cell" battery while ensuring a full charge to all others, > including deep cycle marine, gel and maintenance free automotive. Unit comes > complete with a simple to use hydrometer type battery tester, quick connect > terminal assemblies and a five (5) year "no exclusions" warranty. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stein Bruch" <stein(at)steinair.com>
Subject: Repairman Certificate for New RV Owner
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Just to echo Cy's post, I know of a few "experimental" cubs, taylorcrafts, etc.., but they have been very extensively modified. It is possible, but very difficult. The FAA will not simply re-issue you a new registration just because you change the engine or gear, etc.., and unless the airplane is radically changed, then the rules that CY quoted will most likely apply. That is the most common scenario when re-certifying a cessna, piper, etc.., although there always seems to be someone who gets it done, and then makes everyone think it's simple and very common. Sorry, but not usually so. Cheers, Stein Bruch RV6, Minneapolis ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: Re: Failed primer systems
Date: Mar 17, 2002
> I've tried the "pump the throttle" method a few times since, and it's worked > as reliably as the primer. However, I haven't tried it in the winter yet. Note > also that I've never had an instructor recommend pumping the throttle -- > they've always told me to prime. > > Anyone care to comment? > > Also, does anyone care to comment why the Mooney I fly (fuel injected) > does not have a primer? Instead, you turn on the boost pump and advance > the mixture to full rich for 3-5 seconds in order to prime. I'm not sure why > the procedure is different or whether we can use it. > > Being able to omit the primer system from our installations would be a > good thing, if we can still start our engines in cold weather. > > -Joe Joe, When building my RV-8 I agonized over whether to install a primer system or not. In the end I built in the wiring and switch for a solenoid-activated system but never put the fuel plumbing in. After flying it for almost a year using just the accelerator pump for my primer (WHILE cranking of course), and after reading of just the sort of primer plumbing failures I was afraid of, I decided to permanently abandon the primer system. The final straw was starting one day this winter on a 28 degree morning. Using my normal 1-3 pumps while cranking it would want to start but not quite make it. I started pumping it continually while cranking and it started although not as quickly as when it's warmer. Since I want to avoid having potential failure points necessitated by primer plumbing, and since I was able to start it successfully and reliably in 28 degree weather I will now abandon thinking about it entirely. Every builder will make his/her own decision on this, and where you live certainly comes to bear on it. But if I lived in Minnesota or something I'd have a preheat system which would be just like starting on a spring day. Here in the Northwest we seldom have flying days below freezing so I'm ok. Your mileage may vary, Randy Lervold RV-8, #80500, 151 hrs. www.rv-8.com Home Wing VAF ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: Re: New Engine Break-in.
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Having just ruined a set of cylinders by improper break-in procedures I can offer a few comments, see below... > 1. Should I wait till 10 or 25 hours for my first oil change? I will be > using Aeroshell 65 Mineral oil for the first 50 hours or until the oil > consumption stabilizes. Bart Lalonde recommends changing at both 10 and 20 with the later switching to AD oil. Mineral oil and a filter are cheap insurance, plus it causes you to remove your cowl and look things over. > 2. I will be running the engine hard for a while. How much do I need to > limit my practice of takeoffs and landings while at the same time providing > for proper engine break in? The first hours are the MOST critical, run it HARD. Frankly, I'd fly at least 1-2 hour missions at or near 75% power. > 3. What type of altitude or leaning restrictions should I be using during > the break in period? You can't develop 75% power above 8,000 feet so that's your altitude restriction. Don't lean at all during the first 2-3 hours, then as you notice your CHTs coming down lean slightly but only to the extent that oil and CHT temps stay in the green. Glenn, at 3 hours if you haven't been running it hard enough you could already have started a problem. My advice is to run the next 7 hours as noted above and then change the oil. Continue with high power settings until 20-25 hrs. then change oil again to AD. > Thanks, > Glenn Gordon > N442E, (3 Hours) ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: VS-808PP
Date: Mar 17, 2002
From: "Kendall R. Simmons" <ken(at)truckstop.com>
Drawing 6 shows optional lightening holes in the VS spar doubler VS-808PP. Is anyone cutting these out? If so, are you just using one of the fly-type circle cutters or something more stable. Ken RV8 (emennage) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: VOODOOWORKSHOP(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Subject: shit,fuck,cunt somebody take me off this fuckin' list I am sick
of these e-mails I tried to sign off this group at yahoo but i still get e-mail. maybe if I use foul language I can get kicked off !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: cracking pressure for a spring loaded alternate air door
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Why not control manually? Cy Galley, TC - Chair, Emergency Aircraft Repair, Oshkosh Editor, EAA Safety Programs cgalley(at)qcbc.org or experimenter(at)eaa.org Always looking for articles for the Experimenter ----- Original Message ----- From: "C J Heitman" <cjh(at)execpc.com> Subject: RV-List: cracking pressure for a spring loaded alternate air door I'm doing a back-of-an-envelope calculation for an alternate air door (bypasses the filter) for my RSA injected IO320D1A using some small stainless steel torsion springs that I have laying around. Using two of these springs, I come up with a cracking pressure of about 0.8 inches Hg. Does anyone know if this is a reasonable loss of manifold pressure in case something would block the normal filtered intake? I don't want it to open prematurely to avoid sucking unfiltered air especially since my RV will be based on a turf strip. (The alternate air will have a screen to keep out anything large.) Chris Heitman Dousman WI RV-9A N94ME (reserved) airbox http://www.execpc.com/~cjh/rv9a.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ron Calhoun" <roncal(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Air Vent in Wing
Date: Mar 17, 2002
I have decided to put the air vent in the bottom left wing in my RV4 before mounting the wings. I have looked in the archives for the position (which bay), but no joy. I know I have seen that somewhere. Also, would that one vent be sufficent for two outlets, one to front and one to back? Thanks. Ron Calhoun RV4 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Robertson" <mrobert569(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Repairman Certificate for New RV Owner
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Paul, The new owner will have to have you or an A&P do the Annual Condition Inspection, but he can do any work. Check the Operating Limitations for the plane. There should be a paragraph in there describing who can do the "Yearly Condition Inspection". Make sure he understands all the paragraphs in the Operating Limitations as a person can be violated for them. I don't like seeing that happen. Mike Robertson Das Fed >From: "Paul Besing" <azpilot(at)extremezone.com> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: RV-List: Repairman Certificate for New RV Owner >Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 19:52:00 -0700 > > >Since I recently sold my RV, does the new owner have to have me or an >A&P sign off on any work or condition inspection that he does? > >Das Fed? > >Paul Besing >RV-6A Sold >http://www.lacodeworks.com/besing >Kitlog Pro Builder's Log Software >http://www.kitlog.com > > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: I am sick of these e-mails
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Why don't you grow up, scroll down, and log off. This list has nothing to do with Yahoo at all! ----- Original Message ----- From: <VOODOOWORKSHOP(at)aol.com> Subject: RV-List: I am sick of these e-mails I tried to sign off this group at yahoo but i still get e-mail. maybe if I use foul language I can get kicked off !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 17, 2002
From: Finn Lassen <finnlassen(at)netzero.net>
Subject: Re: Aircraft Batteries.
You can build your own. Kitplanes, April 2002. Finn Pete Bodie wrote: > > Has anybody tried the "BatteryMINDer $39.95 at www.batterymart.com ? > > With up to 85% of the 70 million (Battery Council International, January 98, > 12 months - Nov. 95 - Oct. 96) new 12 volt storage batteries made each year, > destined to die before they should, a new U. S. patent pending product has > come to the rescue. > > BatteryMINDer Charger/Maintainer/Conditioner is the first of a new > generation of "Computer-On-A-Chip" technology. It conditions "sulphated" > batteries as well as automatically charging any type 12 volt storage battery > without ever over-charging. Dubbed the "charger with a brain", it is > believed to be the first charger of its kind to reverse the primary cause of > early battery failure known as "sulphation". "Sulphation" batteries that > were once considered beyond recovery can now be brought back to long-term > useful condition. > > How BatteryMINDer solves battery problems > A simple press of the button starts the fully automatic de-sulphation > process. Unique patent pending PulseMode circuitry (U.S. Patent and > Trademark Office assigned Patent Pending Serial #60/083,473) creates > high-frequency pulses that break down the sulphated crystals. The battery is > then able to reach its full level of charge, without excessive heat > generation. Any 12-volt Maintenance or Maintenance-free type battery, > including Gel and Deep cycle, can be left on charge for months at a time > without fear of damage. Water never needs to be replaced while batteries are > being maintained with BatteryMINDer as the unit never "boils out" the > electrolyte. The unit plugs directly into a standard wall outlet (or > extension cord) eliminating the need to disconnect the battery from its > normal use location. > > The Underwriters Lab (UL) and CSA LISTED BatteryMINDer has both Charge/ > Power On as well as Battery Condition / Polarity indicators. The unit will > reject a "shorted cell" battery while ensuring a full charge to all others, > including deep cycle marine, gel and maintenance free automotive. Unit comes > complete with a simple to use hydrometer type battery tester, quick connect > terminal assemblies and a five (5) year "no exclusions" warranty. ---------------------------------------------------- Sign Up for NetZero Platinum Today Only $9.95 per month! http://my.netzero.net/s/signup?r=platinum&refcd=PT97 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Glenn & Judi" <dirtyrottenscoundrels(at)attbi.com>
Subject: Gear Leg Fairings fallin' down
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Hi, I have an RV-6 with gear leg fairings, intersection fairings, and wheel pants fabricated per plans. After about 2 hours of flying, I noticed the right gear leg fairing has worked its way down the gear leg. The left one has barely moved. To keep this from happening I am considering putting a single hole through the intersection fairing into a tinnerman or plate nut on the aluminum gear leg fairing. Has anyone else had this problem, if so what was your remedy? Do you think my fix will work? Any thoughts as to whether I should put the extra fastener on the fuse/gear intersection fairing at the top, or on the wheel pant/gear leg intersection fairing at the bottom? Thanks, Glenn Gordon N442E ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 17, 2002
From: Bill Marvel <bmarvel(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Repairman Certificate for New RV Owner
In all the recent discussion about an aircraft builder doing an annual condition inspection for the person who bought his airplane, I have yet to see any note of caution regarding the advisability of doing this. Placing one's name in the log of another testifying to the air worthiness of an aircraft is something that should not be taken lightly. There are serious legal ramifications for this in the event of a future accident. Your job, savings and home are all potentially at risk. This is not to say you should not do an annual condition inspection for someone who bought your airplane, but at least recognize there is risk in doing so. Bill Marvel RV8A ready for DAR inspection for A/W cert. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Eaves" <doneaves(at)midsouth.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Repairman Certificate for New RV Owner
Date: Mar 17, 2002
I stand corrected! Cy is correct - Here is a Good Site that answers who can do Experimental Maintenance: http://www.halcyon.com/wanttaja/maint.html Don Eaves ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org> Subject: Re: RV-List: Repairman Certificate for New RV Owner > > "The new owner may perform any work a Owner or Pilot is allowed to do per > the FAR's -:" Don Eaves. > > Since an experimental is not TCed, anyone can work on anything. The problem > with the non-builder, he must get the work approved as airworthy at the > annual conditional inspection. > > Cy Galley, TC - Chair, Emergency Aircraft Repair, Oshkosh > > Editor, EAA Safety Programs > cgalley(at)qcbc.org or experimenter(at)eaa.org > > Always looking for articles for the Experimenter > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Don Eaves" <doneaves(at)midsouth.rr.com> > To: > Subject: Re: RV-List: Repairman Certificate for New RV Owner > > > The new owner may perform any work a Owner or Pilot is allowed to do per the > FAR's - > The new owner may not sign for the condition inspection or maintenance - He > does not hold the Repairman Certificate > You can sign for the condition inspection or maintenance - You will be > responsible for his work - > An A&P may also sign for the condition inspection or maintenance - > > Don Eaves > RV6 Flying 101+ Hours > Technical Counselor - A&P > > Don Eaves > doneaves(at)midsouth.rr.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Besing" <azpilot(at)extremezone.com> > To: > Subject: RV-List: Repairman Certificate for New RV Owner > > > > > > Since I recently sold my RV, does the new owner have to have me or an > > A&P sign off on any work or condition inspection that he does? > > > > Das Fed? > > > > Paul Besing > > RV-6A Sold > > http://www.lacodeworks.com/besing > > Kitlog Pro Builder's Log Software > > http://www.kitlog.com > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JusCash(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Subject: Re: One more intercom question (again?)
I'll call when you get back Cash ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Subject: Passenger step for A models
From: czechsix(at)juno.com
Just a comment on the -8A step....I was all worried that it wasn't going to fit right since had heard from Bill VonDane and others that it would interfere with the rudder cable. Even called Vans about it and they had not heard of any problems....anyway when I did my step a month ago, there was no problems with it....no interference at all with the cable. There's not much clearance (about 1/8") but it's enough. One comment though, after fitting the plate that is riveted to the outside of the fuselage skin, make sure the step is level horizontally before drilling the holes that hold the UHMW block to the baggage floor rib. I had to lift up on the step to get it level before drilling the UHMW....had I not done this, the tube under the baggage floor would have definitely interfered with the rudder cable. Just wondering for you guys who've had this problem, did you ever check to see if you got it level? --Mark Navratil Cedar Rapids, Iowa RV-8A finish kit stuff.... P.S.--IMHO the step is like the nosegear.....the added convenience is worth whatever penalty you pay in looks, drag, weight, time, etc.....if it bothers you too much, build a taildragger : ) From: "Rick Jory" <rickjory(at)msn.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: Passenger step for A models If you decide to install the step, please note: I had to re-locate the holes/bushings for both my aft battery cable plus for the rudder cable in that both (done per plans) interfered with the step (or vice versa). Rick Jory RV8A ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 17, 2002
From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: Gear Leg Fairings fallin' down
Glenn, that is precisely what I did when I upgraded to the Team Rocket fairings. Hit this link and scroll down the page to see the clecoes indicating where the screws and tinnerman washers are located on the upper gear fairing: http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal/fairings.htm I put a screw and washer at the top of the gear leg fairing both inside and out, and no screw at the bottom. After a couple hundred hours, this approach has worked fine. I leave the screws slightly loose so the gear leg fairing can move a little as the gear flexes. Sam Buchanan (RV-6) "The RV Journal" http://thervjournal.com =========================== Glenn & Judi wrote: > > > Hi, > I have an RV-6 with gear leg fairings, intersection fairings, and wheel > pants fabricated per plans. After about 2 hours of flying, I noticed the > right gear leg fairing has worked its way down the gear leg. The left one > has barely moved. To keep this from happening I am considering putting a > single hole through the intersection fairing into a tinnerman or plate nut > on the aluminum gear leg fairing. Has anyone else had this problem, if so > what was your remedy? Do you think my fix will work? Any thoughts as to > whether I should put the extra fastener on the fuse/gear intersection > fairing at the top, or on the wheel pant/gear leg intersection fairing at > the bottom? > > Thanks, > Glenn Gordon > N442E > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 17, 2002
From: Bill Marvel <bmarvel(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Failed primer systems
Joe: > > I've tried the "pump the throttle" method a few times since, and it's > worked > > as reliably as the primer. If you choose to do this, make sure you do it while cranking the engine. The reason is that when you pump the throttle, the accelerator pump portion of the carb is spraying raw gas into the induction system. If you pump the throttle prior to cranking you risk starting a fire in this fuel, which by then has had a chance to run down into your air box. More than a few airplanes have been destroyed by such fires. > > Also, does anyone care to comment why the Mooney I fly (fuel injected) > > does not have a primer? Instead, you turn on the boost pump and advance > > the mixture to full rich for 3-5 seconds in order to prime. I'm not sure > why > > the procedure is different or whether we can use it. This is an important matter for everyone flying light airplanes to know. The primary difference between fuel injection and carburetion is where the fuel is introduced. In fuel injection, it is introduced via the injector nozzles, which are just behind the intake valve, one in each cylinder. In carburetion, fuel is added, not to the cylinders, but at the carburetor. From there the mist of fuel and air has to travel to the cylinders via the tubes of the induction system. When you prime a fuel injected engine, you spray raw fuel into the cylinder via the fuel injection nozzle which is right by the intake valve -- a really good place to put raw fuel. Likewise, when you use the primer system in a carbureted engine, you do the same thing, since the primer nozzle is also located right behind the intake valve. However, when you "prime" a carbureted engine by pumping the throttle, you merely inject additional raw fuel into the carburetor, and this extra fuel has to be mixed with the air flow and be carried as a mist to each of the cylinders. This is not nearly as efficient as introducing the prime fuel just outside of the intake valve. As I mentioned above, throttle pumping can also be a real fire hazard if you do it while not cranking the engine. Bill Marvel RV8A QB ready for DAR inspection ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 17, 2002
From: Bill Marvel <bmarvel(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Carb heat
Has anyone modified one of Van's air boxes in order to dump heated air inside of the air filter instead of outside it? Would appreciate knowing how you did it. About a year ago there was a fatal 6A crash in the Sierras here in CA. Prior to his engine problem the pilot reported flying in snow (this was in IMC and at night over rough terrain at 13,000 feet -- not good decision making for an airline captain flying the 6A). I have been involved with certified airplanes for 25 years and am very familiar with conventional carb heat system design and rigging. Van's is highly unusual in that it dumps heated air into the air box upstream of the air filter. This means the heated air has to first overcome the cold thermal mass of the air filter in order to reach the carburetor downstream of it -- not a good design although arguably very simple and evidently it works OK for most builders. The usual setup is two separate functions with either one or two doors -- one closing off the cold air (as Van does) and another ducting hot air into the carb downstream of the air filter (ie, unfiltered hot air). I intend to eventually do something like this on my 8A, soon to be in flight test. Has anyone else toyed with this mod? Bill Marvel Trucked 8A to Camarillo yesterday for DAR inspection and flight test ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 17, 2002
From: Chris Good <chrisjgood(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Tip-up Slider kit for 6/6A (& 7/7A 8/9A) sliding canopies
Listers, Rich Meske is offering kits for his "tip-up / slider" canopy modification at an introductory price of $140. I've set up a web page for him at: http://www.rv.supermatrix.com/misc/tilt-slider.html Mike Nellis also has some additional photos on his web site. I have ordered a kit & will report to the list when I receive & install it. I think it will make a big difference to the ease of loading our folding bikes! Regards, Chris Good, http://www.rv.supermatrix.com West Bend, WI RV-6A N86CG, 330 hrs ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Joe Larson" <jpl(at)showpage.org>
Subject: RV-6A Firewall
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Well, I went down tonight and had three choices for things to do in the basement. The first one involved cleaning the basement. The second involved putting dimples in the tanks. And the third involved starting the firewall. Guess which sounded like more fun. So now I have questions.... Note that I'm building a 6A. ---- I'm looking at drawing 25, Detail E. This is a detail of the location where the aluminum angle crosses each other. The drawing calls for one piece of 5/8 by 2 by .063 aluminum crossing over one of the angles and into the other -- kinda like a splice. There's a second one that's bent and is riveted to the two angles. The Van's instructions don't mention these parts. They just say the firewall bulkhead comes pre-cleco'd and to start drilling. And my kit doesn't have these guys here. What's the story? ---- Next, this one is pretty minor. For the -6A, we're supposed to fabricate one more piece of angle aluminum, about 7 inches long. It goes on the left side just under the crossed aluminum. There are prepunched holes in the firewall for it. The drawings don't specifically call out a size, but the other angle in the neighborhood is .063. I can't find any 063 angle, but I have a ton of .125. Is it critical? Should I keep looking -- should I have some here somewhere? ---- Now a couple of questions about the recess. I'm assuming that this recess needs to be pushed through the firewall from the forward side, so that the flanges on the recess will be forward of the stainless. Anyone care to comment? Next, Frank Justice's plans recommend that you don't actually rivet this box into place yet, but I didn't see why he said that. Comments on that, too? ---- Thanks for all the help. -Joe ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rv8don(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Subject: Re: Need KX155 Install Manual
I too am lookng for installation information for the KX-155, specifically the pinouts, and have an immediate question for anyone who might know if the unit has a pin for a remote flip-flop function, and if so, which pin? Thanks and regards, -Don RV8 NJ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 17, 2002
From: Chris Good <chrisjgood(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Tip-up Slider kit for 6/6A (& 7/7A 9/9A) sliding canopies
Oops! Sorry for the preceding message with "8" on the subject line. Tip-up Slider kit for 6/6A (& 7/7A 8/9A) sliding canopies should have been Tip-up Slider kit for 6/6A (& 7/7A 9/9A) sliding canopies Sorry RV-8 guys. Regards, Chris Good, http://www.rv.supermatrix.com West Bend, WI RV-6A N86CG, 310 hrs ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "C J Heitman" <cjh(at)execpc.com>
Subject: cracking pressure for a spring loaded alternate air door
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Cy wrote: "Why not control manually?" Cy, I thought about a manual cable. Here is my reasoning for trying to avoid it: One less thing to think about in an emergency. Plus in addition to throttle, prop and mixture controls, I also have control cables for the oil cooler door, parking brake valve and cabin heat. I'm getting cable overload! I thought the spring loaded door would be a simpler solution assuming I get the spring tension correct. Any thoughts on the proper suction needed to open? Chris Heitman ----- Original Message ----- I'm doing a back-of-an-envelope calculation for an alternate air door (bypasses the filter) for my RSA injected IO320D1A using some small stainless steel torsion springs that I have laying around. Using two of these springs, I come up with a cracking pressure of about 0.8 inches Hg. Does anyone know if this is a reasonable loss of manifold pressure in case something would block the normal filtered intake? I don't want it to open prematurely to avoid sucking unfiltered air especially since my RV will be based on a turf strip. (The alternate air will have a screen to keep out anything large.) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JusCash(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Subject: Re: Control Stop Design
The control stops are designed to set the angle of deflection for the control surfaces. This is explained in the builders manual. The rudder stops set the angle and also prevent the rudder from jamming the elevators. The elevator stops are set to design specifications. The aileron stop determines the angle of up deflection. The other ailerons down angle is different due to a differential built into the system. The rigid, interconnecting push tubes provide the down stop. By having positive stops at the controls the design angle's of deflection can be maintained. A heads up on the rudder stops:- Make sure that your rudder cables don't hang up when they go slack. I had to redo mine. Cash Copeland A&P Oakland, Ca RV6 a message dated 3/16/2002 10:32:12 AM Pacific Standard Time, ripsteel(at)edge.net writes: > > > Here's one for all you aerodynamicist-types and airframe designers: > > Why are control surface stops located at the surfaces and not at the > stick or rudder pedals? Any full deflection (stomping on a pedal or > hard over in an upset) stresses the entire control linkage out to and > including the stop attachment. I'm sure there's a reason for this, just > would like to know what the dynamics are for this... do flutter > excursions deflect a surface all the way to the stops, perhaps? > > PLUS today's trivia question: Why is it called a "hangar"? (no, I > don't know, that's why I'm asking!) > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 17, 2002
From: Richard Dudley <rhdudley(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: Repairman Certificate for New RV Owner
See the latest Sport Aviation for an article on this subject. RHDudley Bill Marvel wrote: > > > In all the recent discussion about an aircraft builder doing an annual condition > inspection for the person who bought his airplane, I have yet to see any note of > caution regarding the advisability of doing this. > > Placing one's name in the log of another testifying to the air worthiness of an > aircraft is something that should not be taken lightly. There are serious legal > ramifications for this in the event of a future accident. Your job, savings and > home are all potentially at risk. This is not to say you should not do an > annual condition inspection for someone who bought your airplane, but at least > recognize there is risk in doing so. > > Bill Marvel > RV8A ready for DAR inspection for A/W cert. > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 17, 2002
From: Bill Marvel <bmarvel(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Need KX155 Install Manual
Don: Have a 155 in my Grumman Tiger and have the install manual for it. Give me a fax number if you have one and I can send you the pin diagram. Remote com flip flop is pin P. Remote nav flip flop is pin 13. These are for the 14 v units. Different pins for the 28V. Let me know what you have. Rv8don(at)aol.com wrote: > > I too am lookng for installation information for the KX-155, specifically the > pinouts, and have an immediate question for anyone who might know if the unit > has a pin for a remote flip-flop function, and if so, which pin? > > Thanks and regards, > > -Don > RV8 NJ > > Bill Marvel ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JusCash(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Subject: Re: Carb heat
I thought about modifying the airbox the get hot air directly into the carb. I found that the bottom of the airbox was to close to the bottom of the cowl to make an effective transition. One day I might look into fabricating an airbox that puts the hot air directly into the carb. Until then I will rely my carb temp monitor. Cash Copeland A&P Oakland, Ca RV6 In a message dated 3/17/2002 6:34:47 PM Pacific Standard Time, bmarvel(at)ix.netcom.com writes: > > > Has anyone modified one of Van's air boxes in order to dump heated air > inside of the air filter instead of outside it? Would appreciate > knowing how you did it. > > About a year ago there was a fatal 6A crash in the Sierras here in CA. > Prior to his engine problem the pilot reported flying in snow (this was > in IMC and at night over rough terrain at 13,000 feet -- not good > decision making for an airline captain flying the 6A). I have been > involved with certified airplanes for 25 years and am very familiar with > conventional carb heat system design and rigging. Van's is highly > unusual in that it dumps heated air into the air box upstream of the air > filter. This means the heated air has to first overcome the cold > thermal mass of the air filter in order to reach the carburetor > downstream of it -- not a good design although arguably very simple and > evidently it works OK for most builders. The usual setup is two > separate functions with either one or two doors -- one closing off the > cold air (as Van does) and another ducting hot air into the carb > downstream of the air filter (ie, unfiltered hot air). I intend to > eventually do something like this on my 8A, soon to be in flight test. > Has anyone else toyed with this mod? > > Bill Marvel > Trucked 8A to Camarillo yesterday for DAR inspection and flight test > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ABAYMAN(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Subject: Re: RV-6A Firewall
joe below are answers to your questions: > The Van's instructions don't mention these parts. They just say the firewall > bulkhead comes pre-cleco'd and to start drilling. And my kit doesn't have > these guys here. > > What's the story? > yes you have to fabricate 4 of these for the both sides. "Next, this one is pretty minor. For the -6A, we're supposed to fabricate one more piece of angle aluminum, about 7 inches long. It goes on the left side just under the crossed aluminum. There are prepunched holes in the firewall for it." this will be your break line holding point. in other words, you will need to secure your lines from the peddles to this block. the they run from there on to the rest of the sysytem. "The drawings don't specifically call out a size, but the other angle in the neighborhood is .063. I can't find any 063 angle, but I have a ton of .125. Is it critical? Should I keep looking -- should I have some here somewhere?" you should have plenty of this stuff if your just starting the firewall/fuse. i think i had like 4 - 10' pieces. "Now a couple of questions about the recess. I'm assuming that this recess needs to be pushed through the firewall from the forward side, so that the flanges on the recess will be forward of the stainless. Anyone care to comment?" yes, thats is the way i did mine, with the flush head of the rivit in the engine compartment. don't forget to put a little red rtv to keep carbon monoxide / dioxide. from entering from the engine compartment. "Next, Frank Justice's plans recommend that you don't actually rivet this box into place yet, but I didn't see why he said that. Comments on that, too?" i dimpled and backrivited on a smooth surface. it would have been more difficult. to do it on the plane. i'm almost finished with the plane and have never needed to remove the recess box. so i would rivit it on while you can do a good job of it. hope that helps scott tampa painting fuse ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JusCash(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Subject: Re: RV-6A Firewall
Can't comment on the first on the first part of your question because I have Quick Build. When it was time to install the firewall recess the plans said it went on the rear of the firewall. There was no way that would work. I cut the hole with a cut off wheel. I then riveted the recess box to the front side of the firewall. I used a bead of HiTemp RTV to seal any voids. It was kind of ugly looking at it with no motor mount or engine. With the engine and all the other stuff installed on the firewall you can't see the recess box. You might want to hold off riveting the box on until you install the rudder pedal support and drill the holes for the engine cables. As a matter of fact I wouldn't rivet it on until I was getting ready to hang the engine. I think if I was building a firewall I would still put the recess box on the forward side. Cash Copeland Oakland, Ca RV6 In a message dated 3/17/2002 6:45:41 PM Pacific Standard Time, jpl(at)showpage.org writes: > Now a couple of questions about the recess. I'm assuming that this > recess needs to be pushed through the firewall from the forward side, > so that the flanges on the recess will be forward of the stainless. Anyone > care to comment? > > Next, Frank Justice's plans recommend that you don't actually rivet this > box into place yet, but I didn't see why he said that. Comments on > that, too? > > ---- > Thanks for all the help. > > -Joe ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ABAYMAN(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Subject: Re: Control Stop Design
cash try running a spring from the outer set of rudder sturrips to the firewall. i used 2 carburater springs from the auto parts store. it connects at the same point as the rudder cables connect, and the other end is simply ran to a drilled hole in the firewall angle. when you let off the peddles the 2 return springs pull the bottoms of the peddles toward the firewall taking all the slack out of the cables. works like a champ. scott tampa 0360 c/s tipper rv6a fuse painting ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JusCash(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Subject: Re: RV-6A Firewall
Hi Scott, I was wondering how you riveted the rudder pedal support to the vertical firewall angle with the recess box in place? In a message dated 3/17/2002 7:50:30 PM Pacific Standard Time, ABAYMAN(at)aol.com writes: > i dimpled and backrivited on a smooth surface. it would have been more > difficult. to do it on the plane. i'm almost finished with the plane and > have > never needed to remove the recess box. so i would rivit it on while you can > > do a good job of it. > > hope that helps > > scott > tampa > painting fuse ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Alex Peterson" <alexpeterson(at)usjet.net>
Subject: Re: RV-6A Firewall
Date: Mar 17, 2002
> Next, this one is pretty minor. For the -6A, we're supposed to fabricate > one more piece of angle aluminum, about 7 inches long. It goes on the > left side just under the crossed aluminum. There are prepunched holes in > the firewall for it. > Joe, this piece is to mount the bulkhead fittings for the brake lines which come from the bottom of the master cylinders. Generally I didn't like the design. I found that it had to be bent downward to even be able to get the bulkhead fitting in. Also, I routed the hose from the right pilot's brake cylinder up to the top of the firewall, and then into aluminum tubing for routing down to the right side and eventually to the right gear leg. Otherwise, it is difficult to get from the above mentioned angle below the X on the pilot's side over to the right side of the plane. Alex Peterson Maple Grove, MN 6A N66AP flying 102 hours ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JusCash(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Subject: Re: Control Stop Design
I mentioned the rudder control stops because this is a problem that can be simply eliminated. By moving the rudder stops up a little the cables can't hang up under them. I had thought about using springs, but my support blocks are still tight and the cables don't foul on the stops so I haven't worried about it. Cash Copeland A&P Oakland, Ca RV6 In a message dated 3/17/2002 7:59:46 PM Pacific Standard Time, ABAYMAN(at)aol.com writes: > > cash > try running a spring from the outer set of rudder sturrips to the firewall. > i > used 2 carburater springs from the auto parts store. it connects at the > same > point as the rudder cables connect, and the other end is simply ran to a > drilled hole in the firewall angle. > when you let off the peddles the 2 return springs pull the bottoms of the > peddles toward the firewall taking all the slack out of the cables. works > like a champ. > > scott > tampa > 0360 c/s tipper rv6a > fuse painting > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ABAYMAN(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Subject: Re: RV-6A Firewall
it really wasn't a problem, in fact i placed 2 rudder support brackets . 1 on each side of the box. it made a great break line support, and i made a battery tray out of the top of the recess box and the 2 rudder suports. i guess you need to see a pix as it is hard to describe. i'll see if i can find a pix for you. scott tampa ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Keith and Jean Williams" <kandjwilliams(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Need KX155 Install Manual
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Don, This goes back a few years, but I think the attached scan has a note 2 that covers it. Hope this helps! Keith Williams RV6, Illinois -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Rv8don(at)aol.com Subject: Re: RV-List: Need KX155 Install Manual I too am lookng for installation information for the KX-155, specifically the pinouts, and have an immediate question for anyone who might know if the unit has a pin for a remote flip-flop function, and if so, which pin? Thanks and regards, -Don RV8 NJ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Konrad Werner" <Connywerner(at)wans.net>
Subject: Re: cracking pressure for a spring loaded alternate air door
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Chris, I have to agree with Cy, Manual control lets YOU choose when to suck unfiltered air through your expensive airplane engine. If the "springs" should weaken or even break, how do you know how many times you run unfiltered air through? Even then, the engine would just produce slightly less power than normal, even through a somewhat plugged >Airfilter< And about your cable situation: Throttle, Prop, Mix shall be used at any given time as appropriate! The Parking brake comes in only on the Before-& After Flight checklist, right? Cabin heat only when you get kinda cold, after adjusting to comfort should not change to often? Oil Cooler door? Lycosaur's have some heat range built in, don't have to be within 1, or even 10 degree F. Don't try to micro-manage! So set it up for a joyous flight, adjust whatever is needed once in a while, and then decide when you want filtered air or not thru your Lycoming! But then, that's just how I would do it. Konrad Please, Do not necessarily archive! > Cy wrote: "Why not control manually?" > > Cy, > I thought about a manual cable. Here is my reasoning for trying to avoid it: > One less thing to think about in an emergency. Plus in addition to throttle, > prop and mixture controls, I also have control cables for the oil cooler > door, parking brake valve and cabin heat. I'm getting cable overload! I > thought the spring loaded door would be a simpler solution assuming I get > the spring tension correct. Any thoughts on the proper suction needed to > open? > Chris Heitman > > ----- Original Message ----- > I'm doing a back-of-an-envelope calculation for an alternate air door > (bypasses the filter) for my RSA injected IO320D1A using some small > stainless steel torsion springs that I have laying around. Using two of > these springs, I come up with a cracking pressure of about 0.8 inches Hg. > Does anyone know if this is a reasonable loss of manifold pressure in case > something would block the normal filtered intake? I don't want it to open > prematurely to avoid sucking unfiltered air especially since my RV will be > based on a turf strip. (The alternate air will have a screen to keep out > anything large.) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 17, 2002
From: "J Andrews" <rv8a(at)lycos.com>
Subject: Re: Failed primer systems
Joe, I'm extremely happy with my electric primer system and use it every time I fly. I haven't got around to making the upgrade to electronic ignition or fuel injection yet so I'm still flying the stock O-360. Without failure, if I don't prime my bird it takes about ten or more turns to get it to turn over. My standard routine is four seconds of prime and it starts on the third turn of the blade. Hot weather, cold weather, it's all the same. I did my plumbing in one evening, no big deal. Lots of adel clamps and a one inch loop for strain relief on each side just before it returns to the solenoid. I used 1/8 inch copper by the way. I have a few pics of it on my web site. rv8a.tripod.com - Jim Andrews RV-8A 2,000,000,000 Web Pages--you only need 1. Save time with My Lycos. http://my.lycos.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JusCash(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Subject: Re: RV-6A Firewall
That's what I love about this list, there are so many ways to achieve a goal. I used the recess box to mount the B&C voltage regulator and the avionics fuse block. I found that the plastic brake lines where stiff enough to support themselves if tied together. Cash Copeland Oakland, Ca RV6 In a message dated 3/17/2002 8:24:24 PM Pacific Standard Time, ABAYMAN(at)aol.com writes: > > > it really wasn't a problem, in fact i placed 2 rudder support brackets . 1 > on > each side of the box. it made a great break line support, and i made a > battery tray out of the top of the recess box and the 2 rudder suports. i > guess you need to see a pix as it is hard to describe. i'll see if i can > find > a pix for you. > scott > tampa ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Jewell" <jjewell(at)telus.net>
Subject: Re: RV-6A Firewall
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Hi Joe, Question #: 1- If my memory serves, me the "Detail E" pieces you describe are in one of the many bags. Maybe someone out there can come up with the correct bag number. 2- In one of the bundles of pre-cut angle pieces you should find a part numbered F-6122. This is a piece of sheet stock that has been bent to form a custom made angle that is 1" X 3/4" X 6" It will be noticeable because it has been cut at 45 degrees at each end so as to drop into place on the firewall in the desired position. 3- I chose to fit the Oil filter / Governor recess between the firewall and the angles. I felt that it looked cleaner and would be less likely to annoy me when ever the firewall would need cleaning. 4- The down side of doing the above recess box install is that I was forced to forgo any benefit of having the hole in the fire wall left open to reach through during later installations of various sub assemblies. That is the basic reason for leaving this part un-installed till later in construction. Jim in Kelowna ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Larson" <jpl(at)showpage.org> Subject: RV-List: RV-6A Firewall > > Well, I went down tonight and had three choices for things to do in the basement. > The first one involved cleaning the basement. The second involved putting dimples > in the tanks. And the third involved starting the firewall. > > Guess which sounded like more fun. > > So now I have questions.... Note that I'm building a 6A. > > ---- > I'm looking at drawing 25, Detail E. This is a detail of the location where > the aluminum angle crosses each other. The drawing calls for one piece of > 5/8 by 2 by .063 aluminum crossing over one of the angles and into the > other -- kinda like a splice. There's a second one that's bent and is riveted > to the two angles. > > The Van's instructions don't mention these parts. They just say the firewall > bulkhead comes pre-cleco'd and to start drilling. And my kit doesn't have > these guys here. > > What's the story? > > ---- > > Next, this one is pretty minor. For the -6A, we're supposed to fabricate > one more piece of angle aluminum, about 7 inches long. It goes on the > left side just under the crossed aluminum. There are prepunched holes in > the firewall for it. > > The drawings don't specifically call out a size, but the other angle in the > neighborhood is .063. I can't find any 063 angle, but I have a ton of > .125. Is it critical? Should I keep looking -- should I have some here > somewhere? > > ---- > Now a couple of questions about the recess. I'm assuming that this > recess needs to be pushed through the firewall from the forward side, > so that the flanges on the recess will be forward of the stainless. Anyone > care to comment? > > Next, Frank Justice's plans recommend that you don't actually rivet this > box into place yet, but I didn't see why he said that. Comments on > that, too? > > ---- > Thanks for all the help. > > -Joe > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JusCash(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Subject: Re: cracking pressure for a spring loaded alternate air door
Speaking of alternate air doors. I also fly a Bonanza which has a spring loaded alternate air door. This door also has a manual pull cable. The one time I had impact ice (I believe) obstruct the air filter, I don't think it worked. Got into some unforcast weather, here in California. The engine started losing power, pulled on the alternate air the engine came back to life. I don't think I would rely on a spring loaded door. Cash Copeland Oakland, Ca RV6 In a message dated 3/17/2002 8:29:40 PM Pacific Standard Time, Connywerner(at)wans.net writes: > > Chris, I have to agree with Cy, > > Manual control lets YOU choose when to suck unfiltered air through your > expensive airplane engine. If the "springs" should weaken or even break, > how > do you know how many times you run unfiltered air through? > Even then, the engine would just produce slightly less power than normal, > even through a somewhat plugged >Airfilter< > And about your cable situation: Throttle, Prop, Mix shall be used at any > given time as appropriate! > The Parking brake comes in only on the Before-& After Flight checklist, > right? > Cabin heat only when you get kinda cold, after adjusting to comfort should > not change to often? > Oil Cooler door? Lycosaur's have some heat range built in, don't have to > be > within 1, or even 10 degree F. Don't try to micro-manage! > > So set it up for a joyous flight, adjust whatever is needed once in a > while, > and then decide when you want filtered air or not thru your Lycoming! > > But then, that's just how I would do it. > Konrad > Please, Do not necessarily archive! > > > > Cy wrote: "Why not control manually?" > > > > Cy, > > I thought about a manual cable. Here is my reasoning for trying to avoid > it: > > One less thing to think about in an emergency. Plus in addition to > throttle, > > prop and mixture controls, I also have control cables for the oil cooler > > door, parking brake valve and cabin heat. I'm getting cable overload! I > > thought the spring loaded door would be a simpler solution assuming I get > > the spring tension correct. Any thoughts on the proper suction needed to > > open? > > Chris Heitman > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > I'm doing a back-of-an-envelope calculation for an alternate air door > > (bypasses the filter) for my RSA injected IO320D1A using some small > > stainless steel torsion springs that I have laying around. Using two of > > these springs, I come up with a cracking pressure of about 0.8 inches Hg. > > Does anyone know if this is a reasonable loss of manifold pressure in > case > > something would block the normal filtered intake? I don't want it to open > > prematurely to avoid sucking unfiltered air especially since my RV will > be > > based on a turf strip. (The alternate air will have a screen to keep out > > anything large.) > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jeff Orear" <jorear(at)new.rr.com>
Subject: Re: RV-6A Firewall
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Hi Joe: I'll see if I can help here> The slices you are referring to are the only things you need to fabricate for the firewall. As I recall, they came as separate pieces of aluminum. There was just enough material for me to make mine. Just make them like the plans show. Should be in a plastic bag(?) Keep looking for that 7" angle. Note that it actually has a part number.....F6122...and that it is 1 x 3/4 x .063. Most of the .125 stock you will have will be 3/4 x 3/4. The extra width is needed for support of the brakelines. This piece is probably in a plastic bag of parts also. It is my understanding that the flange of the recess box goes on the forward side of the firewall. I need to return my box, as it is just a smudge too wide. Called Van's and Gus measured a few off the shelf and they were the right size. I'm just lucky I guess.......You don't rivet it on so you can get at the center bearing block for the rudder peddles when the time comes. Hope this helps. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Larson" <jpl(at)showpage.org> Subject: RV-List: RV-6A Firewall > > Well, I went down tonight and had three choices for things to do in the basement. > The first one involved cleaning the basement. The second involved putting dimples > in the tanks. And the third involved starting the firewall. > > Guess which sounded like more fun. > > So now I have questions.... Note that I'm building a 6A. > > ---- > I'm looking at drawing 25, Detail E. This is a detail of the location where > the aluminum angle crosses each other. The drawing calls for one piece of > 5/8 by 2 by .063 aluminum crossing over one of the angles and into the > other -- kinda like a splice. There's a second one that's bent and is riveted > to the two angles. > > The Van's instructions don't mention these parts. They just say the firewall > bulkhead comes pre-cleco'd and to start drilling. And my kit doesn't have > these guys here. > > What's the story? > > ---- > > Next, this one is pretty minor. For the -6A, we're supposed to fabricate > one more piece of angle aluminum, about 7 inches long. It goes on the > left side just under the crossed aluminum. There are prepunched holes in > the firewall for it. > > The drawings don't specifically call out a size, but the other angle in the > neighborhood is .063. I can't find any 063 angle, but I have a ton of > .125. Is it critical? Should I keep looking -- should I have some here > somewhere? > > ---- > Now a couple of questions about the recess. I'm assuming that this > recess needs to be pushed through the firewall from the forward side, > so that the flanges on the recess will be forward of the stainless. Anyone > care to comment? > > Next, Frank Justice's plans recommend that you don't actually rivet this > box into place yet, but I didn't see why he said that. Comments on > that, too? > > ---- > Thanks for all the help. > > -Joe > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 17, 2002
From: Dave Bristol <bj034(at)lafn.org>
Subject: Re: Need KX155 Install Manual
Don, Mike and all, KX155 pinout: Pin: 14 +14 R +14 15 gnd S gnd 2 mic audio 6 mic key 9 com audio hi K com audio low 10 nav audio hi L nav audio low 13 nav flip flop P com flop flop 12 switched +14 to KI208 8 ILS energize to KI208 H VOR composite signal to KI 208 I don't remember if the flip flop pins are switched to + or ground and the book is at the airport - I'll check Tues. or Wed. and let you know. Dave -6 So Cal Rv8don(at)aol.com wrote: > > I too am lookng for installation information for the KX-155, specifically the > pinouts, and have an immediate question for anyone who might know if the unit > has a pin for a remote flip-flop function, and if so, which pin? > > Thanks and regards, > > -Don > RV8 NJ > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "George McNutt" <gmcnutt(at)intergate.ca>
Subject: Rudder Pedal Support
Date: Mar 17, 2002
--------------------- a suggestion. During the recent 6A firewall discussion someone mentioned the rudder pedal support bracket. Just thought that I would mention that I made a second (dummey) rudder support bracket on the other side of the firewall cutout and made a equipment platform across the top of the two supports. Good for mounting equipment provided thought is given to future removal for servicing. In my case I mounted the controller for the electronic ignition on the shelf. George McNutt Langley, B.C. 6A - final assembly ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "George McNutt" <gmcnutt(at)intergate.ca>
Subject: Electrical Load Analsys
Date: Mar 17, 2002
Need some help from you electrical wizzards. Just completed a Electrical Load Analsys for my 6A equipped with Vans 35 amp Alternator, Vans adjustable Voltage Regulator and Vans Engine Instruments. Think I am OK, but just a couple of amps under the maximum recommended (80%) continuous load on the alternator during IFR night operations. However I would like to refine my analsys to get accuracy as close as possible. The actual current draw is not included in the paperwork that Van's provides with his equipment and I have estimated the current draw of Vans instruments & senders at .18 amps for each complete unit. My questions: 1) Does anyone have, or could they measure on the bench, the actual electrical current draw for Vans fuel gauge, tachometer, oil pressure, oil temperature, fuel pressure and voltmeter. 2) Is the alternator rating (35 amp) the gross or net output rating, in other words is the alternator field load subtracted from the output. What would the alternator field load be? 3) How much current would the voltage regulator itself use (Vans adjustable ES-M5-150A). Thanks, George McNutt, Langley B.C. 6-A, final assembly & paperwork ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ewinne(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Subject: Engine Break-in procedures
Glenn: Go to Mattituck Aviation's web site (www.mattituck.com) and look at their "Tech Advice" section. They have an article on break-in procedure. Ed Winne RV9A Palmyra PA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Norman" <jnorman(at)intermapsystems.com>
Subject: RV-6A Firewall
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Joe, I wouldl like to make a suggestion to you... Buy the Orndorf videos and a bag of chips. Sit down and watch them build their firewall, eat your chips. All of these questions are answered in the videos. Not trying to be a butt, as your questions are welcome here, but you will have 1000's of questions with time, and these videos have helped build 1000's of RVs. Very educational stuff because you get to watch it done and learn why some things are being done in certain order, etc. Things that are not covered in the plans. This advice goes to anybody who is a newbee...these videos will make your project go smoother and be more enjoyable. jim tampa -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Alex Peterson Subject: Re: RV-List: RV-6A Firewall > Next, this one is pretty minor. For the -6A, we're supposed to fabricate > one more piece of angle aluminum, about 7 inches long. It goes on the > left side just under the crossed aluminum. There are prepunched holes in > the firewall for it. > Joe, this piece is to mount the bulkhead fittings for the brake lines which come from the bottom of the master cylinders. Generally I didn't like the design. I found that it had to be bent downward to even be able to get the bulkhead fitting in. Also, I routed the hose from the right pilot's brake cylinder up to the top of the firewall, and then into aluminum tubing for routing down to the right side and eventually to the right gear leg. Otherwise, it is difficult to get from the above mentioned angle below the X on the pilot's side over to the right side of the plane. Alex Peterson Maple Grove, MN 6A N66AP flying 102 hours ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Robert Di Meo" <bdimeo(at)attbi.com>
Subject: VS-808PP
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Ken, I didn't bother. Bob RV8 #423 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Kendall R. Simmons Subject: RV-List: VS-808PP Drawing 6 shows optional lightening holes in the VS spar doubler VS-808PP. Is anyone cutting these out? If so, are you just using one of the fly-type circle cutters or something more stable. Ken RV8 (emennage) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dana Overall" <bo124rs(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: VS-808PP
Date: Mar 18, 2002
>Drawing 6 shows optional lightening holes in the VS spar doubler >VS-808PP. Is anyone cutting these out? If so, are you just using one >of the fly-type circle cutters or something more stable. > >Ken >RV8 (emennage) Ken, I didn't bother with that either. It's good to know that area is so overbuilt, though. Dana Overall Richmond, KY 7 Emp. http://63.69.213.180/newtech/danas_airplane_factory/project.html Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Michel Boucher" <michelboucher594(at)rogers.com>
Subject: Control Stop Design
Date: Mar 18, 2002
My personal theory on this is that if any slack would develop in the control linkages particularly cables you would still be able to get full control deflections if the control stops are at the surfaces. Even at that I have seen many controls on certified airplanes where the cables were loose enough that the stick would bang on the instrument panel and the elevator would not reach its stop. Just a theory though Michel 81117 a message dated 3/16/2002 10:32:12 AM Pacific Standard Time, ripsteel(at)edge.net writes: > > > Here's one for all you aerodynamicist-types and airframe designers: > > Why are control surface stops located at the surfaces and not at the > stick or rudder pedals? Any full deflection (stomping on a pedal or > hard over in an upset) stresses the entire control linkage out to and > including the stop attachment. I'm sure there's a reason for this, just > would like to know what the dynamics are for this... do flutter > excursions deflect a surface all the way to the stops, perhaps? > > PLUS today's trivia question: Why is it called a "hangar"? (no, I > don't know, that's why I'm asking!) > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: cracking pressure for a spring loaded alternate air door
Date: Mar 18, 2002
How would you easily check its operation? Instead of one less thing to worry about, you now have no way of doing a check for functionality. Most planes have a carb heat cable. You don't need it for Fuel injection. Why not use for your alternate air door. Further, the door could be partially open all the time or might only open in the worse case which might be too late. I believe Mooney uses a spring loaded door but when it wears, there are problems. Cy Galley, TC - Chair, Emergency Aircraft Repair, Oshkosh Editor, EAA Safety Programs cgalley(at)qcbc.org or experimenter(at)eaa.org Always looking for articles for the Experimenter ----- Original Message ----- From: "C J Heitman" <cjh(at)execpc.com> Subject: RE: RV-List: cracking pressure for a spring loaded alternate air door Cy wrote: "Why not control manually?" Cy, I thought about a manual cable. Here is my reasoning for trying to avoid it: One less thing to think about in an emergency. Plus in addition to throttle, prop and mixture controls, I also have control cables for the oil cooler door, parking brake valve and cabin heat. I'm getting cable overload! I thought the spring loaded door would be a simpler solution assuming I get the spring tension correct. Any thoughts on the proper suction needed to open? Chris Heitman ----- Original Message ----- I'm doing a back-of-an-envelope calculation for an alternate air door (bypasses the filter) for my RSA injected IO320D1A using some small stainless steel torsion springs that I have laying around. Using two of these springs, I come up with a cracking pressure of about 0.8 inches Hg. Does anyone know if this is a reasonable loss of manifold pressure in case something would block the normal filtered intake? I don't want it to open prematurely to avoid sucking unfiltered air especially since my RV will be based on a turf strip. (The alternate air will have a screen to keep out anything large.) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2002
From: Kevin Horton <khorton(at)cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: Air Vent in Wing
> >I have decided to put the air vent in the bottom left wing in my RV4 before >mounting the wings. I have looked in the archives for the position (which >bay), but no joy. I know I have seen that somewhere. Also, would that one >vent be sufficent for two outlets, one to front and one to back? Thanks. > >Ron Calhoun >RV4 > Well, the RV-8 design uses a NACA scoop in the bottom of the wing for the rear seat ventilation air. It uses the NACA scoop that Van sells, and the forward edge of the opening is about 8.75 inches aft of the main spar web. Van puts it on the bottom of the right wing, but I would have thought the left wing would be a better bet due to the prop wash. Van puts the vent a few inches outboard of the wing walk. My -8 isn't flying yet, so I won't comment on whether one NACA scoop would provide enough air for both seats. -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (installing engine & electrics) Ottawa, Canada http://eccentrix.com/misc/rv8/rv8.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dana Overall" <bo124rs(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Foam table and new tail.
Date: Mar 18, 2002
The following are pictures of the foam I put around the C-Frame and of my new tail. The foam is 4" thick, so I allows you to move your material around without fear of scratching it on the male dimple die. You only have to push down 1/4" to get to the dimple. Works great. The new tail was completed yesterday after about 10 hours of very easy work. Only had to drill out one rivet. http://63.69.213.180/newtech/danas_airplane_factory/graphic/p8.jpg http://63.69.213.180/newtech/danas_airplane_factory/graphic/p9.jpg Dana Overall Richmond, KY 7 Emp. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wes" <whays(at)camalott.com>
Subject: Re: Need KX155 Install Manual
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Don, The Nav and Comm remote transfer pins are as follows: For a 13.75 VDC system: (If you have a 27.5 VDC system please let me know. The pins are different.) *Nav Remote Transfer (optional) - Pin 13 *Comm Remote Transfer (optional) - Pin P and refers you to Note 2 which reads: Remote transfer allows transfer of "use" and "stby" frequencies by neans of an external switch. 13.75 volst versions utilize 27.5 volt power pins for remote trnasfer inputs and 27.5 volt versions utilize the 13.75 volt power pins. If remote transfer is not desired, the inputs will not require any connection. If remote transfer is desired, the appropriate transfer input should be momentarily switched from A/C ground to A/C power. I can't draw the bottom part of the note but on the drawing it appears to be hooked up as follows: The drawing says to use a SPDT momentary switch, normally closed contact is power ground, normally open contact is A/C power. Normally closed, Pins 13 and P go to A/C ground. When the switch is momentarially activated, Pins 13 and P go from ground to A/C power. Hope this helps. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. Wes Hays N844WB Winters, TX 230+ hours. "The Laws of Aerodynamics are unforgiving and the ground is hard." Michael Collins (1987) ----- Original Message ----- From: <Rv8don(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: Need KX155 Install Manual > > I too am lookng for installation information for the KX-155, specifically the > pinouts, and have an immediate question for anyone who might know if the unit > has a pin for a remote flip-flop function, and if so, which pin? > > Thanks and regards, > > -Don > RV8 NJ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2002
From: Bill Marvel <bmarvel(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: RV-6A Firewall
Joe: > I wouldl like to make a suggestion to you... > Buy the Orndorf videos and a bag of chips. Sit down and watch them build > their firewall, eat your chips. All of these questions are answered in the > videos. Ditto this as well as the great success I had with Vans directly by email. In building my 8A QB over the past 15 months I found many plans errors, omissions, etc., as well as the standard "what does this mean?" questions and communicated all this to Gus Funnell at Vans by email. I could send Gus a message at the end of a work day and have an answer at the same time the following day. On occasion I called him on the phone for additional information. He is a 6 (or 6A) owner, knows the answers to practically everything you ask, and has short, simple email responses. Don't discount the factory for support! They're very good. Bill Marvel Soon to see the DAR for signoff. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2002
From: old ogre <jollyd(at)ipns.com>
Subject: for sale RV8A
98-99% completed, 0320, 160hp, new C/S prop, painted. ect. please contact me for pix, priced at $61,500.00. or call..I love to talk about RV's! 503-678-3343 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2002
From: Bill Marvel <bmarvel(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: QB snafus
To all QB guys: I encountered two problems with QB quality control in building my 8A and told Vans about both. FYI here they are: 1. The wing is shipped with only some of the AN bolts installed that attach the tanks to the spar and you are cautioned to be sure to put in the rest of them. However, what I discovered was that the bolts they had installed were AN3s all right, but the wrong length -- all of them. Van took the incorrect ones back and sent me new ones. Read the plans and don't assume... 2. Most recently, in ground running the engine from both wing tanks and leak checking the entire fuel system, I discovered a fuel leak in the supposedly-pressure-checked tanks that the QB guys had built. Actually this leak was in the right tank only. You need to look into this because it is very subtle and may well be in your tanks too. I'll dispense with part numbers but here is a working description. Take a good hard look at your airplane to make sure this did not happen to you. In the inboard fuel tank rib there is an access plate through which your fuel sender is installed. This access plate is attached to the inboard rib via a number of machine screws that go into nut plates. These nut plates are riveted through both the inboard rib and a backup ring behind that rib (the backup ring and the nut plates are inside of the tank). Here is the problem. In the rib there is a tooling hole that is covered by the backup plate. It is just forward of the spar and is easily seen. The outboard edge of the tooling hole in my plane extended slightly beyond the outer edge of the doubler ring that was supposed to cover that tooling hole. The positioning is such that this direct opening from the tank to the wing root area was outboard of the gasket that is used between the rib and the access plate. It is this gasket that is supposed to prevent fuel leaking through this tooling hole. In my case it did not and the result was a very small but definite fuel leak. Pulling off the wing and the access plate (wing was on temporarily with hardware store bolts) allowed me to put a flashlight into the tank and thus see the tiny spot of light shining through the leakage path. I am sure they pressure checked this but it is a small leak and may not have been noted. But leak it did. WARNING -- if you use tank sealant for access plates, plate screws, gasket attachment, etc. make sure it is the proper one for this application or the plate will be welded to the rib). You want the low adhesion stuff for fuel tank access plates. A review of the text of the plans clearly indicated that no sealant was needed between the doubler ring and the inner rib because the gasket between the access plate and the rib would cover this area. Great plan but it won't work if the tooling hole is outside of the footprint area of the gasket as mine was! The fix was easy -- with the access plate off, spread a ring of sealant around the outside diameter of the doubler ring inside the tank. This worked fine. Do yourselves a favor and get into that tank at night with a flashlight to make sure you don't see light from inside the tank through a tiny portion of that tooling hole. If you do, order up some tank sealant. Bill Marvel RV8A getting ready for DAR inspection One good deed beats 100 good intentions... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2002
From: doyal plute <dplute(at)onemain.com>
Subject: RV6A rail bolts:
Has anyone devised a simple way of installing the nuts on the underside of the sliding canopy side rails on an RV 6A? Sincerely: Doyal ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2002
From: old ogre <jollyd(at)ipns.com>
Subject: lyc E2D
for sale, lyc E2D, with all accessories..high timer, but good compression, hear it run..removing it for a upgrade..$8,500.00 plus shipping....loctaed aurora, ore. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: KBoatri144(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Subject: Re: RV6A rail bolts:
In a message dated 3/18/02 10:52:36 AM Eastern Standard Time, dplute(at)onemain.com writes: << Has anyone devised a simple way of installing the nuts on the underside of the sliding canopy side rails on an RV 6A? Sincerely: Doyal >> If I was going to do it again, I'd install platenuts on the rail before I riveted the rails to the fuselage. That said, I faced the same problem a year or two ago, and spent an entire evening sweating and cursing before I got all of the nuts in place. What finally worked was pushing a piece of coat hangar wire down through each hole, and running a nut up the coat hangar to properly align it with the hole. Then, once it was reasonably aligned, I would hold it in place with my finger (small fingers help), remove the coat hangar, and try to thread the screw. Kyle Boatright 0-320/Aymar Demuth RV-6 Slider Kennesaw, GA http://www.angelfire.com/my/rv6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ABAYMAN(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Subject: Re: RV6A Firewall
permatex 26B red high temp RTV silicone found at any auto parts store. scott tampa ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2002
From: Richard Dudley <rhdudley(at)att.net>
Subject: Re: RV6-List: RV6A rail bolts:
Hi Doyal, My solution was to put nutplates on an aluminum stip to match the holes drilled through the rail and deck. The aluminum strip is much more handlable than single nuts. So far, I have only two screws and nutplates to hold the rails in place. I expect that the remainder will be as easy as the first two. I will leave the strip in place when I drill the remaining holes. Then remove the strip and add the remaining nutplates. Hope this helps. Regards, Richard Dudley -6A finishing (N331RD reserved) Orlando doyal plute wrote: > > --> RV6-List message posted by: doyal plute > > Has anyone devised a simple way of installing the nuts on the underside > of the sliding canopy side rails on an RV 6A? > Sincerely: > Doyal > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2002
From: Bill Marvel <bmarvel(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: RV6A rail bolts:
Doyal: > << Has anyone devised a simple way of installing the nuts on the underside > of the sliding canopy side rails on an RV 6A? > Sincerely: > Doyal >> > What > finally worked was pushing a piece of coat hangar wire down through each > hole, and running a nut up the coat hangar to properly align it with the > hole. Then, once it was reasonably aligned, I would hold it in place with my > finger (small fingers help), remove the coat hangar, and try to thread the > screw. Hint for many uses: get a can of fuel lube, available from most aviation suppliers. Aside from its obvious use of lubing threads, valves, etc. in fuel systems, it has another incredibly valuable property. The stuff is really sticky and allows you to attach washers, nuts, rivets, etc to your finger or to a piece of sheet metal used as an extension for holding the part in difficult areas to reach. I bought one can of this stuff about 20 years ago and still have half of it left. I use it all the time as a temporary holding method for small parts. Bill Marvel ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "KostaLewis" <mikel(at)dimensional.com>
Subject: Air Vent in Wing
Date: Mar 18, 2002
>I have decided to put the air vent in the bottom left wing in my RV4 before >mounting the wings. I have looked in the archives for the position.... Hey, Ron: I have the NACA vent in the bottom of the right wing for fresh air ventilation for the back seat of my dash 4. I can get exact measurements this afternoon on its location as I am in the middle of my conditional inspection. >Would that one vent be sufficient for two outlets, one to front and one to back? My vote: no, probably not. I guess it depends on how much air you want blowing on you and/or your passenger. I like LOTS of air for both. That canopy gets mighty big in the summer sun. The outlet from the NACA vent is 2 inches which m a y be enough for two one inch vents, one in front, one in back. I have a 2 inch eyeball vent in the back that will blow your wig plumb off and two one inch eyeballs for the front. Front seat air is taken from the rear baffling. Incoming air temperature is slightly above ambient air temperature (never measured exactly how much) but not much. I have them open winter and summer, unless it is REALLY cold out. I can also crank the rear one around to blow on my back in the summer. I would send photos, but my digital camera is acting up. If I can get it to work, I'll send you some. Michael RV-4 N232 Suzie Q ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ABAYMAN(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Subject: Re: pitot line sealant
hi guys and gals i went through the process of certifying my pitot static system and calibrating my encoder and transponder. we found many small vaccuum leaks in the plastic fittings. i fixed most by remaking the connections, but i can't seem to seal the plastic fitting to the instruments. is there some sort of sealant i'm supposed to use on the threads of the clear plastic fittings? scott tampa ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Greg Young" <gyoung@cs-sol.com>
Subject: RV6A rail bolts:
Date: Mar 18, 2002
I match drilled a long strip and mounted all the nutplates. Works great and you can do it any time. Got the idea from this list years ago. I also mounted 3/16 & 1/4 nutplates to the longeron spacers/clamps used to mount the windshield bow. That save a lot of one finger fumbling as well. Regards, Greg Young - Houston (DWH) RV-6 N6GY ...Rebuilding! searching for Navion to fly > > In a message dated 3/18/02 10:52:36 AM Eastern Standard Time, > dplute(at)onemain.com writes: > > << Has anyone devised a simple way of installing the nuts on > the underside > of the sliding canopy side rails on an RV 6A? > Sincerely: > Doyal >> > >> If I was going to do it again, I'd install platenuts on the >> rail before I >> riveted the rails to the fuselage. >> ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2002
From: Bill Marvel <bmarvel(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: pitot line sealant
Scott: One of the best things you can use to seal the pipe threads of nylon pitot and static fittings into the back of instruments is ordinary plumbers white pipe dope available in a small tube at Home Depot or anyplace else. One of the guys who does pitot static testing here in So. Cal. as a full time business told me about it some time back and it works perfectly. Bill Marvel ABAYMAN(at)aol.com wrote: > > hi guys and gals > i went through the process of certifying my pitot static system and > calibrating my encoder and transponder. we found many small vaccuum leaks in > the plastic fittings. i fixed most by remaking the connections, but i can't > seem to seal the plastic fitting to the instruments. is there some sort of > sealant i'm supposed to use on the threads of the clear plastic fittings? > scott > tampa > -- Bill Marvel Home/office 310 832 7617 P.O. Box 784 Cell 310 293 2013 San Pedro, CA 90733 Fax 310 832 5334 One good deed beats 100 good intentions... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Subject: Re: RV6A rail bolts:
From: <racker(at)rmci.net>
What worked easily for me: Take a 1" piece of masking tape, loop it around with the sticky side out, with a slight overlap (cheap man's way to make double sided tape). Place tape on tip of index finger, place nut on tape. Place finger/nut under slider rail, get nut started (no cursing required). Repeat for all locations, final tighten using wrench and screwdriver all locations. Took me less than 10 minutes to all of them this way (the second time that is, the first was 1 1/2 hours of colorful verbiage). This method also works well on the rollover bar nuts. Rob Acker (RV-6). > > In a message dated 3/18/02 10:52:36 AM Eastern Standard Time, > dplute(at)onemain.com writes: > > << Has anyone devised a simple way of installing the nuts on the > underside > of the sliding canopy side rails on an RV 6A? > Sincerely: > Doyal >> > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dirtyrottenscoundrels(at)attbi.com
Subject: Kittyhawk 2003, Tie Down Reservations!!!!!!!!!!
Date: Mar 18, 2002
For those of you who will be attending the First Flight Centennial at Kittyhawk in Dec. 2003, here is some heads up info. Dare County Regional will be making a reservation list public at Sun and Fun this April. Parking is limited to about 1200 aircraft. This will be a BIG event lasting all week. http://www.fly2mqi.com/calendar.htm Attached is a copy of the reservation request form. IT MUST BE MAILED IN as they need your actual signature for processing your credit card. I have been in touch with the airport operations director since late 2000. He told me that I could pass this reservation form onto a few friends, so here you have it. I hope to see a lot of RV's there. Don't forget to find yourselves some hotel rooms. Here is the form.... ** Note: RV's are Category I Complete and return to: Dare County Regional Airport P O Box 429 Manteo, NC 27954 www.fly2mqi.com e-mail: 2003(at)fly2mqi.com December 2003 Requested Dates: 10 * 11 * 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 * Please provide any additions Aircraft Parking dates: Please Accept my application for parking reservations at Dare County Regional Airport (MQI) for the period checked above. Pilot Information Name Address City State Zip Code Home Phone ( ) Work Phone ( ) Fax ( ) E-mail - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Aircraft Information Aircraft Make: Aircraft Model: Tail #: Color/s: For credit card billing, complete form below: American Express AirBP Name on Card: Signature: Card Number: Type: Expiration Date: / - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Type & Location 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th 17th 18th Week Rate Category I - Grass Parking $20 $20 $20 $40 $40 $40 $30 $170 Category II - Grass Parking $30 $30 $30 $50 $50 $50 $40 $240 NOTE: No tie downs are provided - bring you own tie down equipment. Category III - Apron $120 $120 $120 $150 $150 $150 $140 $850 Category III - Rwy 17 $80 $80 $80 $120 $120 $120 $100 $600 Category III - Rwy 35 $60 $60 $60 $80 $80 $80 $80 $450 Category IV - Apron $130 $130 $130 $160 $160 $160 $150 $900 Category IV - Rwy 17 $90 $90 $90 $130 $130 $130 $90 $650 Category IV - Rwy 35 $70 $70 $70 $100 $100 $100 $70 $530 * NOTE: Daily Rate prior to and after the above dates will be $5.00 per day. No aircraft will be allowed to park on runway 17-35 prior to December 12 or after December 19, 2003. You will be notified of receipt and assigned section. No refund will be issued unless written cancellation is received prior to October 1, 2003. Accepted for Dare County Regional Airport By: . Section Assigned: Type Payment Received: Date: Deposited: Notified by: ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2002
From: Gary Liming <gary(at)liming.org>
Subject: Interior upholstery material
Could someone direct me to a good source of the kind of lightweight interior upholstery material that they show on the "From the Ground Up" series that is just glued to aluminum panels and burned with a soldering iron for the screw holes? I have been to fabric stores and upholstery stores, but everything I have seen looks too heavy. Thanks, Gary Liming ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stein Bruch" <stein(at)steinair.com>
Subject: RE: RV6-List: RV6A rail bolts:
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Two things, #1, build a small special socket wrench as many have, or #2, Install nutplats like I an many of my other fellow builders have. Cheers, Stein Bruch RV6, Minneapolis --> RV6-List message posted by: doyal plute Has anyone devised a simple way of installing the nuts on the underside of the sliding canopy side rails on an RV 6A? Sincerely: Doyal ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2002
From: rob ray <smokyray(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: There are no dumb questions....
Steve; Thanks for bringing this subject out to the world. I have wondered about it myself. By the way for guys like the Ogre, I am a fighter pilot with 3000 hours in the F16 and THERE ARE NO DUMB QUESTIONS! Keep asking my friend! Thanks. Rob Ray N557RR --- old ogre wrote: > --> RV4-List message posted by: old ogre > > > thanks , Jene...I did have a bad experience with > using it just a few hours..(to > get home)..and pre-ign..(that I didn't hear) really > messed up the engine..wound > up re-building the thing after only 590hrs on a new > engine..and you should have > seen the crud that came out of the sump! jolly in > aurors > > Gene Smith wrote: > > > --> RV4-List message posted by: "Gene Smith" > > > > > I don't know what experience the "Jolly Ogre" had > with auto oil, or how long > > it was used, however, that advice is apparently > correct.....A wonderful > > source is Light Plane Maintenance Library: > 1-800-241-7529, 75 Holly Hill > > Lane/P.O. Box 2626/Greenwich, Ct. > 06836-2626..........Their book on "Fuel & > > Oil Systems," chapter 8 (Lubrication Requirements) > page 103 says: > > "Automotive oil should never be used however, > since ash deposits will > > eventually form in the combustion chamber, > presenting a very real danger in > > terms of preignition." There are other > discussions on sludge, circulation, > > and etc.......Chapter 7 discusses additives and is > very enlightening on > > their effectiveness. I recommend investigating > this > > info............CHEERS!!!!!..........Good luck > Steve Mullins...........Gene > > Smith. Original > Message ----- > > From: old ogre <jollyd(at)ipns.com> > > To: > > Subject: Re: RV4-List: Auto Oil? > > > > > --> RV4-List message posted by: old ogre > > > > > > > I tried it in an emergency situation a while > back, and found that it was > > NOT > > > satisfactory....if you value your engine and > your skin..don't do it!..blue > > skys > > > to you!...jolly, the oger in aurora, or. > > > > > > Steve Mullins wrote: > > > > > > > --> RV4-List message posted by: "Steve > Mullins" > > > > > > > > Hey Guys and Gals, > > > > > > > > I recently heard (or read) about the use of > auto engine oil in Lyc and > > Cont > > > > a/c engines in exp a/c? > > > > Does anyone have any experience/knowledge > about this? > > > > > > > > Steve (always looking for a safe way to save a > buck) Mullins, Ph.D. > > > > Associate Professor of Economics > > > > Drury University > > > > 417.889.5609 (home) > > > > 417.873.7299 (office) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Contributions of > any other form > > latest messages. > other List members. > > http://www.matronics.com/subscription > http://www.matronics.com/photoshare > http://www.matronics.com/search > http://www.matronics.com/archives > http://www.matronics.com/emaillists > > > > > http://sports.yahoo.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: RV-10 update
Date: Mar 18, 2002
I noticed there is an update on Van's website for the RV-10, which addresses airfoil, flap design and stick vs. wheel issues. I'd say it's shaping up to be one really sweet airplane. http://www.vansaircraft.com/public/rv-10int4.htm Brian Denk RV8 N94BD Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Konrad Werner" <Connywerner(at)wans.net>
Subject: Re: Slippery stuff
Date: Mar 18, 2002
> To counter someone's remarks: One of my friends flies a 172 off the VA coast doing fish spotting and has used Castrol 20W50 and auto gas in his 3000 HOUR 0-320 with no ill effects, burning 1 qt per 7 hours. In fact, he has worn out 5 engines in 24,000 hours of fish spotting so I think he might have a clue. I'm sure alot of the problems would be related to FAA/PMA and other Fed bureaucracy. It's nice to ask why rather than blindly following OLD TRENDS.... My two cents worth: A commercial pilot I assume, flying in a stringent Part 135 operation, with a certificated Airframe (Cessna 172) and the mighty fine Castrol 20W50 AUTO-OIL? And he does care about having an Auto-Gas STC for his (commercially used) Airframe/Engine Combo, right? By saying he flew 3000 hrs. with the engine, does that mean that this fellow flew it for 3000 hrs. without the mandatory overhaul (again, P.135?) at 2000 hrs.? Would you mind posting this pilots name and contact phone number on this list, because I am sure some members would like to discuss his adventures, experiences and recommendations directly with him? Another $0.02 for the kitty: Remember the Mobil-AV1 disaster? This oil destroyed the bottom ends of engines, because (as I remember correctly) it could not cope with the lead contend in 100-LL, to keep it suspended in the oil, so it separated and left rotating things unlubricated enough to destroy them by operation of such? Maybe it is not the oils but rather the incompatibility with some of the fuels we feed them? Obviously not a problem with the guy in the above C-172 running Auto-Gas AND Auto-Oil? Maybe THAT was the missing link we all needed to know about? What is the price difference & cost savings between Castrol 20W50 versus Aeroshell 100 anyway, to justify to mess with it? The price difference comes to maybe $5.00-$6.00(?) per oilchange every 50 hrs.! So just about a Dime an hour more for running what is recommended by the engine manufacturers? I hate to reinvent the wheel, but rather use it for my transportation! > PS:I for one buy my Aeroshell wholesale from a distributor in large lots, but run autogas mixed with Marvel with 750 great hours, clean plugs and normal wear... Just one penny for this one here: I think Marvel Mystery Oil hasn't harmed any engine yet, so I use it in my cars gastank once in a while as well, to clean the injection systems as well as give a little extra lubrication to all parts involved. Like Chrismas dinner for the engine! My A/C friends swear by it and/or lie for it! Well, so far I spend my allowance of a Nickel today! Hope I offended NO One, but still would see the 172 pilots contact info posted? Sincerely, Konrad Do not necessarily archive my $0.05 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Joe Hine" <joehine(at)nbnet.nb.ca>
Subject: Re: RV4-List: There are no dumb questions....
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Guys I was just reading over this Orge thread and I think that in the original post from Ogre, my sense of it is he was indicating he was ASKING a dumb question. Just thought I would say this in fairness. Joe Hine RV4 C-FYTQ ----- Original Message ----- From: rob ray <smokyray(at)yahoo.com> Subject: RV4-List: There are no dumb questions.... > --> RV4-List message posted by: rob ray > > Steve; > > Thanks for bringing this subject out to the world. I > have wondered about it myself. By the way for guys > like the Ogre, I am a fighter pilot with 3000 hours in > the F16 and THERE ARE NO DUMB QUESTIONS! Keep asking > my friend! Thanks. > > Rob Ray > N557RR > --- old ogre wrote: > > --> RV4-List message posted by: old ogre > > > > > > thanks , Jene...I did have a bad experience with > > using it just a few hours..(to > > get home)..and pre-ign..(that I didn't hear) really > > messed up the engine..wound > > up re-building the thing after only 590hrs on a new > > engine..and you should have > > seen the crud that came out of the sump! jolly in > > aurors > > > > Gene Smith wrote: > > > > > --> RV4-List message posted by: "Gene Smith" > > > > > > > > I don't know what experience the "Jolly Ogre" had > > with auto oil, or how long > > > it was used, however, that advice is apparently > > correct.....A wonderful > > > source is Light Plane Maintenance Library: > > 1-800-241-7529, 75 Holly Hill > > > Lane/P.O. Box 2626/Greenwich, Ct. > > 06836-2626..........Their book on "Fuel & > > > Oil Systems," chapter 8 (Lubrication Requirements) > > page 103 says: > > > "Automotive oil should never be used however, > > since ash deposits will > > > eventually form in the combustion chamber, > > presenting a very real danger in > > > terms of preignition." There are other > > discussions on sludge, circulation, > > > and etc.......Chapter 7 discusses additives and is > > very enlightening on > > > their effectiveness. I recommend investigating > > this > > > info............CHEERS!!!!!..........Good luck > > Steve Mullins...........Gene > > > Smith. Original > > Message ----- > > > From: old ogre <jollyd(at)ipns.com> > > > To: > > > Subject: Re: RV4-List: Auto Oil? > > > > > > > --> RV4-List message posted by: old ogre > > > > > > > > > > I tried it in an emergency situation a while > > back, and found that it was > > > NOT > > > > satisfactory....if you value your engine and > > your skin..don't do it!..blue > > > skys > > > > to you!...jolly, the oger in aurora, or. > > > > > > > > Steve Mullins wrote: > > > > > > > > > --> RV4-List message posted by: "Steve > > Mullins" > > > > > > > > > > Hey Guys and Gals, > > > > > > > > > > I recently heard (or read) about the use of > > auto engine oil in Lyc and > > > Cont > > > > > a/c engines in exp a/c? > > > > > Does anyone have any experience/knowledge > > about this? > > > > > > > > > > Steve (always looking for a safe way to save a > > buck) Mullins, Ph.D. > > > > > Associate Professor of Economics > > > > > Drury University > > > > > 417.889.5609 (home) > > > > > 417.873.7299 (office) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Contributions of > > any other form > > > > latest messages. > > other List members. > > > > http://www.matronics.com/subscription > > http://www.matronics.com/photoshare > > http://www.matronics.com/search > > http://www.matronics.com/archives > > http://www.matronics.com/emaillists > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://sports.yahoo.com/ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Joe Hine" <joehine(at)nbnet.nb.ca>
Subject: Could be a good buy
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Hi all I came across this today and thought I would pass it along. Might be a good buy for some one looking for the engine, and get someing to fly until you need it in the mean time. http://www3.ns.sympatico.ca/jdann/cgiby Cheers. Joe Hine C-FYTQ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Van Artsdalen, Scott" <svanarts(at)unionsafe.com>
Subject: There are no dumb questions....
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Amen to that! I'm literally a font of dumb questions! And don't worry, I have just as many dumb answers too! RV-Listers, whatever your question may be, dumb or otherwise, don't let the list police discourage you. Ask away. Just remember to try to search the archives first if you can. If you don't have web access, say so. We won't laugh at you too long. Did I mention that I'm an opinionated son of a gun too? Scott (Defender of the Dumb) VanArtsdalen, MCSE, CCNA Network Administrator Union Safe Deposit Bank 209-946-5116 -----Original Message----- From: rob ray [mailto:smokyray(at)yahoo.com] Subject: RV-List: There are no dumb questions.... Steve; Thanks for bringing this subject out to the world. I have wondered about it myself. By the way for guys like the Ogre, I am a fighter pilot with 3000 hours in the F16 and THERE ARE NO DUMB QUESTIONS! Keep asking my friend! Thanks. Rob Ray N557RR --- old ogre wrote: > --> RV4-List message posted by: old ogre > > > thanks , Jene...I did have a bad experience with > using it just a few hours..(to > get home)..and pre-ign..(that I didn't hear) really > messed up the engine..wound > up re-building the thing after only 590hrs on a new > engine..and you should have > seen the crud that came out of the sump! jolly in > aurors > > Gene Smith wrote: > > > --> RV4-List message posted by: "Gene Smith" > > > > > I don't know what experience the "Jolly Ogre" had > with auto oil, or how long > > it was used, however, that advice is apparently > correct.....A wonderful > > source is Light Plane Maintenance Library: > 1-800-241-7529, 75 Holly Hill > > Lane/P.O. Box 2626/Greenwich, Ct. > 06836-2626..........Their book on "Fuel & > > Oil Systems," chapter 8 (Lubrication Requirements) > page 103 says: > > "Automotive oil should never be used however, > since ash deposits will > > eventually form in the combustion chamber, > presenting a very real danger in > > terms of preignition." There are other > discussions on sludge, circulation, > > and etc.......Chapter 7 discusses additives and is > very enlightening on > > their effectiveness. I recommend investigating > this > > info............CHEERS!!!!!..........Good luck > Steve Mullins...........Gene > > Smith. Original > Message ----- > > From: old ogre <jollyd(at)ipns.com> > > To: > > Subject: Re: RV4-List: Auto Oil? > > > > > --> RV4-List message posted by: old ogre > > > > > > > I tried it in an emergency situation a while > back, and found that it was > > NOT > > > satisfactory....if you value your engine and > your skin..don't do it!..blue > > skys > > > to you!...jolly, the oger in aurora, or. > > > > > > Steve Mullins wrote: > > > > > > > --> RV4-List message posted by: "Steve > Mullins" > > > > > > > > Hey Guys and Gals, > > > > > > > > I recently heard (or read) about the use of > auto engine oil in Lyc and > > Cont > > > > a/c engines in exp a/c? > > > > Does anyone have any experience/knowledge > about this? > > > > > > > > Steve (always looking for a safe way to save a > buck) Mullins, Ph.D. > > > > Associate Professor of Economics > > > > Drury University > > > > 417.889.5609 (home) > > > > 417.873.7299 (office) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Contributions of > any other form > > latest messages. > other List members. > > http://www.matronics.com/subscription > http://www.matronics.com/photoshare > http://www.matronics.com/search > http://www.matronics.com/archives > http://www.matronics.com/emaillists > > > > > http://sports.yahoo.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: SSPRING83(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Subject: Auto Oils
Hello Listers: l,ve been following the chatter about auto vs aviation oil with interest these last few days and would like to throw in my two cents worth on it. First l would not endorse either one as the beauty of a homebuilt is that we are pretty much free to decide what we want to run in our engines and when and how much. However l have to give thought to those engines that run in these race cars such as Datona and even the Indy 500 as well as numerous other tracks thruout our great nation. Consider the Porsche's that run . Here is an engine pretty much the same design as the 0320 or 360. Aircooled, runs an oil cooler, has a dry sump and probably about the same compression ratio,maybe a little higher, and runs about three times the revs for an entire 24 hrs without the oil breaking down and burning anything up. Consider the abuse that that engine has to endure and the length of time it has to endure it. Now having said that, can anyone say that that oil has shown itself to be inferior in any way to what we have been trained to believe , is the far superior Aviation Oil? I agree with Rob Ray when he states that there are no dumb questions, However l think that the real dumb question is the one that we were afraid to ask, for fear of the ridicule that we may subject ourselves to. I think that we should open our eyes, question what we want to know and then make our own decisions from the info that we have available. l pray that l hav,nt offended anyone with my thoughts on oils, they are my own. l wish you all blue skys and CAVU. George Spring Chester, Ct. RV-4 4375J ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DFCPAC(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Subject: Re: RV4-List: Auto Oils
While reading the list on oil, marvel mystery oil was mentioned. can you put it in avgas? how much is added? is it really good for the engine? or just a precaution? thanks dan carley rv-4 N2275S ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard D. Fogerson" <rickf(at)velocitus.net>
Subject: Navaid in RV 3, Order Motor Mount with Fuselage
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Hi Everyone, I have a couple of questions: 1) Has anyone installed a Navaid in an RV 3? I'm just wondering if it can be installed under the seat like it can be with the larger kits. 2) I thought it might be a good idea to get the motor mount with the fuselage kit since I have heard some stories of people having misalignments with the holes that come in the firewall and the mount when they get it later in the finish kit. Van's doesn't think it's necessary and it would be an extra $860 now rather than later. Any opinions out there? Thanks Rick Fogerson RV3 fuselage soon (yeehaw!) Boise, ID ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard D. Fogerson" <rickf(at)velocitus.net>
Subject: Navaid in RV 3, Order Motor Mount with Fuselage
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Hi Everyone, I have a couple of questions: 1) Has anyone installed a Navaid in an RV 3? I'm just wondering if it can be installed under the seat like it can be with the larger kits. 2) I thought it might be a good idea to get the motor mount with the fuselage kit since I have heard some stories of people having misalignments with the holes that come in the firewall and the mount when they get it later in the finish kit. Van's doesn't think it's necessary and it would be an extra $860 now rather than later. Any opinions out there? Thanks Rick Fogerson RV3 fuselage soon (yeehaw!) Boise, ID ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2002
From: Mike Thompson <grobdriver(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: 1/8 Inch Copper Priming Line Source
Hi Folks, I don't remember how I went about estimating how much of the 1/8-inch copper tubing I would need to plumb the primer, but I have come up 6 inches short. I have not found any in that size at the usual places (Home Depot, Lowes, Hobby store) and am wondering if anyone has found an unexpected local-to-a-fair-sized-city source of this stuff. I've padded the subject line for the future because it appears from an archive search that others are more clever then me and haven't run into this problem. Haven't been to a small-motor shop (read lawn-mower repair) but don't even know if those type machines even use it. Hate to order a foot and pay their shipping and worst of all, have to wait! At this end of the project things get impatient, as some of you know. Thanks! Mike Thompson Austin, TX -6 N140RV (Reserved) Firewall Forward http://sports.yahoo.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Konrad Werner" <Connywerner(at)wans.net>
Subject: Re: RV4-List: Auto Oils
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Dear Dan, The red Marvelous Mystery Bottle reads as follows: For best results add 4 ounces to each 10 gallons of gasoline or diesel fuels. For fleet use in bulk tanks add 1quart (32oz.) to each 100 gallons of gasoline or diesel fuel. (I do know that the diesel part has no relevance, so please don't ask if you can now run diesel fuel in your RV!). . . . . . Treat yourself to a bottle in the next Auto Parts store, they run less than $3.00 / 32oz.(quart) around here. I use it mainly as a precaution (or better supplement) and to just baby my internal combustion toys around here. Konrad ----- Original Message ----- From: <DFCPAC(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: RV4-List: Auto Oils > --> RV4-List message posted by: DFCPAC(at)aol.com > > While reading the list on oil, marvel mystery oil was mentioned. can you put > it in avgas? how much is added? is it really good for the engine? or just a > precaution? > > thanks > dan carley > > rv-4 N2275S ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Austin" <6430(at)axion.net>
Subject: Pinholes
Date: Jan 04, 1980
Hi Listers, I spent 4 hours yesterday shooting primer on all my fibreglass parts and was blown away..no pun intended...at the appearance of pinholes in the S cowl.... Until you shoot a prime on it, it is just not visible as to how porous it looks. GAWD, it looks just like screen mesh for a screen door....I know my primer ain't going to fill that..have you seen the same ? What is the best remedy to fill before thinking about top color ? I did try some superfill and epoxy over part of it but the results were not too great and it is very labor intensive for such a big area....what have you guys done ?? Any input appreciated. Thanks, Austin Vancouver. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Mullins" <smullins(at)drury.edu>
Subject: Re: RV4-List: There are no dumb questions....
Date: Mar 18, 2002
>>Rob said.. >>I am a fighter pilot with 3000 hours in >>the F16 You really know how to hurt a guy, Rob. My dad was AAF and flew Thunderbolts in WWII. I wanted to fly military as well, but eyesight kept me out. Do you feel guilty for being PAID to fly Falcons? (Just kidding, I know it is hard, dangerous work.) Cheers! Steve Mullins, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Economics Drury University 417.889.5609 (home) 417.873.7299 (office) ----- Original Message ----- From: "rob ray" <smokyray(at)yahoo.com> Subject: RV4-List: There are no dumb questions.... > --> RV4-List message posted by: rob ray > > Steve; > > Thanks for bringing this subject out to the world. I > have wondered about it myself. By the way for guys > like the Ogre, I am a fighter pilot with 3000 hours in > the F16 and THERE ARE NO DUMB QUESTIONS! Keep asking > my friend! Thanks. > > Rob Ray > N557RR > --- old ogre wrote: > > --> RV4-List message posted by: old ogre > > > > > > thanks , Jene...I did have a bad experience with > > using it just a few hours..(to > > get home)..and pre-ign..(that I didn't hear) really > > messed up the engine..wound > > up re-building the thing after only 590hrs on a new > > engine..and you should have > > seen the crud that came out of the sump! jolly in > > aurors > > > > Gene Smith wrote: > > > > > --> RV4-List message posted by: "Gene Smith" > > > > > > > > I don't know what experience the "Jolly Ogre" had > > with auto oil, or how long > > > it was used, however, that advice is apparently > > correct.....A wonderful > > > source is Light Plane Maintenance Library: > > 1-800-241-7529, 75 Holly Hill > > > Lane/P.O. Box 2626/Greenwich, Ct. > > 06836-2626..........Their book on "Fuel & > > > Oil Systems," chapter 8 (Lubrication Requirements) > > page 103 says: > > > "Automotive oil should never be used however, > > since ash deposits will > > > eventually form in the combustion chamber, > > presenting a very real danger in > > > terms of preignition." There are other > > discussions on sludge, circulation, > > > and etc.......Chapter 7 discusses additives and is > > very enlightening on > > > their effectiveness. I recommend investigating > > this > > > info............CHEERS!!!!!..........Good luck > > Steve Mullins...........Gene > > > Smith. Original > > Message ----- > > > From: old ogre <jollyd(at)ipns.com> > > > To: > > > Subject: Re: RV4-List: Auto Oil? > > > > > > > --> RV4-List message posted by: old ogre > > > > > > > > > > I tried it in an emergency situation a while > > back, and found that it was > > > NOT > > > > satisfactory....if you value your engine and > > your skin..don't do it!..blue > > > skys > > > > to you!...jolly, the oger in aurora, or. > > > > > > > > Steve Mullins wrote: > > > > > > > > > --> RV4-List message posted by: "Steve > > Mullins" > > > > > > > > > > Hey Guys and Gals, > > > > > > > > > > I recently heard (or read) about the use of > > auto engine oil in Lyc and > > > Cont > > > > > a/c engines in exp a/c? > > > > > Does anyone have any experience/knowledge > > about this? > > > > > > > > > > Steve (always looking for a safe way to save a > > buck) Mullins, Ph.D. > > > > > Associate Professor of Economics > > > > > Drury University > > > > > 417.889.5609 (home) > > > > > 417.873.7299 (office) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Contributions of > > any other form > > > > latest messages. > > other List members. > > > > http://www.matronics.com/subscription > > http://www.matronics.com/photoshare > > http://www.matronics.com/search > > http://www.matronics.com/archives > > http://www.matronics.com/emaillists > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://sports.yahoo.com/ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Saindon" <wfsaindon(at)clinic.net>
Subject: Re: RV3-List: Navaid in RV 3, Order Motor Mount with Fuselage
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Rick, I can't answer your question about the navaid. But when I built my RV3 I didn't have any problems with with my engine mount holes lining up. If I remember right you only drill the holes to 3/16th or so until you get your mount. Mine lined up perfectly. Bill Saindon RV3 15.6 flying time (Painting A/C) Bowdoinham, Me ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard D. Fogerson" <rickf(at)velocitus.net> Subject: RV3-List: Navaid in RV 3, Order Motor Mount with Fuselage > --> RV3-List message posted by: "Richard D. Fogerson" > > Hi Everyone, > I have a couple of questions: > > 1) Has anyone installed a Navaid in an RV 3? I'm just wondering if it > can be installed under the seat like it can be with the larger kits. > > 2) I thought it might be a good idea to get the motor mount with the > fuselage kit since I have heard some stories of people having > misalignments with the holes that come in the firewall and the mount > when they get it later in the finish kit. Van's doesn't think it's > necessary and it would be an extra $860 now rather than later. Any > opinions out there? > > Thanks > Rick Fogerson > RV3 fuselage soon (yeehaw!) > Boise, ID > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: KBoatri144(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Subject: Re: Pinholes
In a message dated 3/18/02 7:40:12 PM Eastern Standard Time, 6430(at)axion.net writes: << Hi Listers, I spent 4 hours yesterday shooting primer on all my fibreglass parts and was blown away..no pun intended...at the appearance of pinholes in the S cowl.... Until you shoot a prime on it, it is just not visible as to how porous it looks. GAWD, it looks just like screen mesh for a screen door....I know my primer ain't going to fill that..have you seen the same ? What is the best remedy to fill before thinking about top color ? I did try some superfill and epoxy over part of it but the results were not too great and it is very labor intensive for such a big area....what have you guys done ?? Any input appreciated. Thanks, Austin Vancouver. >> My recommendation is an epoxy/micro mix squeegied into the cowl, then sanded smooth, then primed. I used the "smoothprime" pinhole filling product, and thought it was OK, but I'd skip it and just do the microballoon thing if I was going to repeat the task. The archives have quite a bit of information on this subject. Kyle Boatright 0-320/Aymar Demuth RV-6 Slider Kennesaw, GA http://www.angelfire.com/my/rv6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ferdfly(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Subject: Re: RV-6A Firewall
In a message dated 3/17/2002 7:50:39 PM Pacific Standard Time, ABAYMAN(at)aol.com writes: > > this will be your break line holding point. in other words, you will need > to > secure your lines from the peddles to this block. the they run from there > on > to the rest of the sysytem. > > This is a good place to install your parking brake valve too. Fred (Flintstone) LaForge RV-4 180 cs EAA Tech Counselor in SO.CAL. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Konrad Werner" <Connywerner(at)wans.net>
Subject: Re: Auto Oils
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Dear George, > However l have to give thought to those engines that run in these > race cars such as Datona and even the Indy 500 as well as numerous other > tracks thruout our great nation. Consider the Porsche's that run . Here is an > engine pretty much the same design as the 0320 or 360. Aircooled, runs an > oil cooler, has a dry sump and probably about the same compression > ratio, maybe a little higher, and runs about three times the revs for an > entire 24 hrs without the oil breaking down and burning anything up. **My first two cents: And the Porsche engine has tighter tolerances, maybe higher compression, even twin turbo charged and best of all, a beltdriven FORCED FAN AIR COOLING! If the belt(s) goes, you are talking about a rapid meltdown of the engine! Our beloved A/C Engines use fuel to aid cooling on climbout, 'cause they miss the fan, and have tolerances you can drop a penny thru, etc. etc. BTW: The meltdown test is less costly to try on a Beatle-Engine vs. the Porsche. Ever wondered why the VW Aero Conversions never developed the power the same engine would easily get in the VW-cars? Excessive HEAT, or better the lack of sufficient removel of same from the engine during its operation! > Consider the abuse that that engine has to endure and the length of time it has to > endure it. Now having said that, can anyone say that that oil has shown > itself to be inferior in any way to what we have been trained to believe, is > the far superior Aviation Oil? **Another two cents: The Oil is only a part of the big picture, the oil does the job it is intended for, consider this: I use a (diesel specific) mineral Chevron Delo 400-15W40 in the Cummins Engine year round with engine heater, but use synthetic Mobil 1-15W50 in both our cars in the summer and Mobil 1-10W30 in the colder months. So why don't I use the far "superior" synthetic Mobil 1 in the Diesel Engine too? Because that is not what it was designed for! It just can't handle the Soot concentrations present there, but it does just great with high revving & hot running gas engines. So, it has somewhat to do with the fueling of the powerplant, doesn't it? How about this one: "Would I be running Aeroshell of any kind in a Porsche engine?" Oh Lord no, unless Shell formulates it for use in a tightly toleranced, high performance, hotrunning (aircooled or watercooled) small displacement engine. And about "Superior Aviation Oil": It is highly, but also only-, superior in the environment it was designed for! Slow turning, big volumed A/C Engines! Ever wondered how the manufacturers got newer cars to run on 10W30, then 5W30 and now even 5W20 all year round. In the hot summers, the viscosity must be a just a little above water on the last one. It's all in the tolerances which effect the ever tighter emmission regulations mandated by the Fed's, and thinner oil gives better fuel mileage as well. How come a Rotax 912 should use Mobil 1? Same tight reason, and because it comes with liquid cooled heads as well for better Head Temp.-Control. And because the Austrian's designed (and therefore recommend) their little highrevving engine to be run on Auto-Oil !!!! So, I am shelling out the $4.00 for the Mobil-1 for my Cars, then $1.50 for the Delo-400 for the Diesel Truck. And the specialized Aero-Oil (which runs here about $2.25 single / $4.25 multi viscosity) is right in there in cost as well, so what would anyone prove in using the Auto-Oil in the Aviation environment??? What exactly is the Point that I miss in the equation of savings vs. benefits? Or maybe it is just a way to come up with another wrongful death lawsuit by suing an (Auto-)Oil Co. after the ensuing fire that followed the crash of a beloved Test-Pilot ?? No offense, but i think Aeroshell, etc. is my best bacon insurance Konrad ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Subject: Re: Duckworks Landing Lights: Lens Shape
From: Joe L Cabe <jscabe(at)juno.com>
Randall, I read your post and recognized your name. You have a great web site and I plan to refer to it as I build my fuselage. Joe ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2002
From: "Builder's Bookstore" <winterland(at)rkymtnhi.com>
Subject: Re: Pinholes
> Hi Listers, > I spent 4 hours yesterday shooting primer on all my > fibreglass parts and was blown away..no pun intended...at the appearance of > pinholes in the S cowl The long answer is that there is a green putty that comes in a tube that is available at all auto body and auto paint retailers that does a good job in filling those little holes. Sorry, I forgot what the stuff is called, but its a common material and if you ask for it by this description you'll get the right stuff. You apply it with a small plastic squeegie and sand off the excess. The short answer is to be happy you're not building a Lancair. Andy ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2002
From: Jim Ahman <ahmanrv4(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: RV4-List: RV-4 Project FOR SALE
Not sure what he is asking, but as a reference I purchased my second hand '82 vintage Empennage & Wing kits (without hardware such as hinges which had been used by the owner for other projects) for $800 total. Best regards, Jim Ahman RV-4, Empennage ----- Original Message ----- From: "rob ray" <smokyray(at)yahoo.com> Subject: Re: RV4-List: RV-4 Project FOR SALE > --> RV4-List message posted by: rob ray > > Hi Konrad; > > What are you asking for your kit? > > Rob > --- Konrad Werner wrote: > > --> RV4-List message posted by: "Konrad Werner" > > > > > > My fellow RVators, > > > > RV-4 Tail & Wing Kits FOR SALE > > Early 1980's Kit, Serial number is in the two > > digits. A VIRGIN (i.e. > > nearly untouched). > > Today's cost from Vans would be over $5400 for the > > same Kit (-with > > predrilled parts). > > > > This is a great opportunity to get started on a > > Van's RV-4, while at the > > same time saving some serious (engine) money over > > buying new! > > Please contact me OFF LIST if you are interested, > > and then make me a > > reasonable offer for the two Kits! > > > > Sincerely, > > Konrad Werner > > Albuquerque, NM. > > Connywerner(at)wans.net > > > > > > > > Contributions of > > any other form > > > > latest messages. > > other List members. > > > > http://www.matronics.com/subscription > > http://www.matronics.com/photoshare > > http://www.matronics.com/search > > http://www.matronics.com/archives > > http://www.matronics.com/emaillists > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://sports.yahoo.com/ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2002
From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: Navaid in RV 3, Order Motor Mount with Fuselage
The Navaid servo can be easily mounted at the wing tip of *any* RV. Click here: http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal/navaid.html I think this is the mounting method now recommended by the Navaid guys; they now include hardware and drawings with the servo for the wing tip installation. Sam Buchanan (RV-6) "The RV Journal" http://thervjournal.com ====================== "Richard D. Fogerson" wrote: > > > Hi Everyone, > I have a couple of questions: > > 1) Has anyone installed a Navaid in an RV 3? I'm just wondering if it > can be installed under the seat like it can be with the larger kits. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: KBoatri144(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Subject: Pre-Flight Passenger Briefings
I had an interesting experience the other day that reminded me of how important preflight passenger briefings are. A gentleman called me at work, introduced himself as someone I met at an EAA meeting, and asked if he could get a ride in the RV. I remembered one guy from our last meeting who was considering an RV-4, and had asked for a ride whenever we could get together. Being terrible with names, I form a mental picture of the RV-4 guy who is maybe 5'9, 170 lbs, and say OK. We make arrangements to meet at an airport convenient to him. After work, off I go, and meet him at the designated airport. After landing, I'm directed to park on the ramp beside a BeechJet. I stop the airplane, recognize my passenger on sight, and realize that this isn't the person I expected. This guy is 6'2, 300+ pounds. With me sitting in the cockpit and him standing on the pilot's side of the airplane, we chit chat for a minute, and the BeechJet pilots come up and ask if I want to trade airplanes for a trip around the pattern. I told the BeechJet guys that I'd be glad to, but they would have to show me how to start the engines, and I was kind of in a hurry. Maybe next time? They look disappointed. About then, I tell my passenger "Let's get you in the airplane, 'cause its gonna be dark in an hour and I want to be home before then". Before I can untangle myself from the headsets and unbuckle the harness, he darts around the plane and is quickly standing on the right wing. I'm thinking "I hope he only stepped on the wing walk, not a flap or something". Before this thought clears, he begins to climb into the cockpit using the sliding canopy and the roll-over fairing as his handholds. I tell him "WOAH Big Fella", and explain what he can and CANNOT grab as he climbs in. About that time, I'm thinking that we're right at my gross weight of 1675 pounds, and he simply isn't gonna get a very good ride, because I don't yank the airplane around at those weights, and takeoff and climb performance are degraded. We get him buckled in, I crank the engine, and go to retract the flaps. His butt is in the way of the flap handle. With some deft manipulation he pulls his left cheek out of the way so I can raise the flaps. As I'm talking to ground control and (later) the tower, he's just talking away over there, without regard to whether I need to hear what the FAA guys are saying. In my one smart move of the day, I have him remove the copilot's stick just to make sure I have full control movement (big stomach and thighs on this guy) on takeoff. Finally, we launch, using a lot of runway (for an RV, anyway), and as we depart, he's still talking. Despite my hints, he continued to talk for almost the entire flight. Later, when we returned to the field, I finally had to ask him to keep quiet unless he saw something wrong. The flight itself was uneventful. After a while, I had him reinstall the stick on the copilot's side, and allowed him to fly for a while. The first minute or so, I kept my hand on the stick as a damper, and made sure to remind him of how sensitive the airplane was. This was a good move too, because he was inclined to overcontrol. Once he got the feel of the airplane, he was fine... I did have him remove the copilots stick before we landed. After I dropped him off and returned to my home field, I checked the sheet metal on the right wing. It was getting dark, but I could see heel marks where his shoes had scuffed across the wing. The heel marks rubbed out with thumb pressure, and I don't THINK there are any dents, but it was too dark to tell. I'll check later. What did I learn for next time? 1) I'll know exactly who I'm giving a ride to before I agree. I'll also have a good idea of their size. If there is any question, I'll clarify before agreeing to give the ride. 2) I'll make sure the prospective passenger knows not to touch the aircraft until I explicitly explain where the handholds and footholds are. (Aside: Why is it that people who walk up to your airplane when you're sitting in it like to lean on the canopy? Also, why do people at airshows do the same thing when they want to look at the panel? I HATE it when people touch the plexi. Too expensive, too much time to build, too fragile, too easily scratched, and too hard to repair!) 3) I'll explain my "quiet cockpit" rule, which applies within 10 miles of ANY airport. This rule is that unless the passenger sees a potential traffic conflict, or sees something else amiss, s/he needs to be quiet so I can hear the radio. Believe it or not, I have always followed these three rules (until this flight). In this case, I got sloppy because of time considerations. This fellow isn't on the RV-list, so I don't feel bad about publishing this here. However, I ask that it NOT be posted elsewhere. No need to embarrass the guy if he goes web-searching one day... Kyle Boatright 0-320/Aymar Demuth RV-6 Slider Kennesaw, GA http://www.angelfire.com/my/rv6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Bundy" <ebundy(at)velocitus.net>
Subject: Re: 1/8 Inch Copper Priming Line Source
Date: Mar 18, 2002
This stuff can be really tricky to find. I ended up finding 2 local auto parts stores that had it. The big chains like Shucks didn't have it but I found some in 2 of the smaller, local, more expensive type places. Call every auto parts place in the yellow pages and you might get lucky. Ed Bundy - RV6A N427EM 450+ hours 160hp 0320 w/Sensenich 70x78 Eagle, ID ebundy(at)velocitus.net > I don't remember how I went about estimating how much of the 1/8-inch > copper tubing I would need to plumb the primer, but I have come up 6 > inches short. > > I have not found any in that size at the usual places (Home Depot, > Lowes, Hobby store) and am wondering if anyone has found an unexpected > local-to-a-fair-sized-city source of this stuff. I've padded the > subject line for the future because it appears from an archive search > that others are more clever then me and haven't run into this problem. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Alex Peterson" <alexpeterson(at)usjet.net>
Subject: Fantastic Tip
Date: Mar 18, 2002
I renamed Bill Marvel's post and reposted it, as this tip is definitely one of the most valuable in a long time (wish I had known about this in the car-head days of my youth) > Hint for many uses: get a can of fuel lube, available from most aviation > suppliers. Aside from its obvious use of lubing threads, valves, etc. in fuel > systems, it has another incredibly valuable property. The stuff is really sticky > and allows you to attach washers, nuts, rivets, etc to your finger or to a piece > of sheet metal used as an extension for holding the part in difficult areas to > reach. The stuff is not called fuel lube anymore, but if you call Spruce and ask for it they will tell you what it is now called. Alex Peterson Maple Grove, MN 6A N66AP flying 102 hours ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Starn" <jhstarn(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: RV financing (without longevity at residence or job)
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Over the years (62 of them) I've come to the understanding that banks etc. want you to prove you don't need a loan before you can get one. KABONG ----- Original Message ----- From: Dan Checkoway <dan(at)rvproject.com> Subject: RV-List: RV financing (without longevity at residence or job) > I just got turned down for financing from NAFCO because I just moved and I ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Alex Peterson" <alexpeterson(at)usjet.net>
Subject: Re: RV6A rail bolts:
Date: Mar 18, 2002
> Has anyone devised a simple way of installing the nuts on the underside > of the sliding canopy side rails on an RV 6A? Nutplates are the way to go here. Additionally, the two little stepped brackets which are under the rollover bar are good candidates for large nutplates. Alex Peterson Maple Grove, MN 6A N66AP flying 102 hours ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Jewell" <jjewell(at)telus.net>
Subject: Re: RV3-List: Navaid in RV 3, Order Motor Mount with Fuselage
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Rick, Navaid question, I can't help you much. Engine mount question: Buy mount now or later? It's a matter of choice. The pre drilled locating holes in the firewall are small enough to allow the mount to be placed on the firewall to find best average position. Moving the mount over the holes and finding two of the holes that when centered offer the best overall fit. Clamp the mount in place, drill and bolt the first two holes thereby locking the mount in place. Next use the remaining engine mount bolt position bosses as guides to drill out the rest of the holes. If you are concerned that this method might damage the engine mount bosses use a piece of tube that will slide inside the mount bosses. Use a drill that will fit inside. Grease this drill guide, drill with a drill that will fit inside it. Now the holes will be on center and can be final drilled to spec without fear of undue damage to the mount. If the mount bosses and holes are off center so bad that this procedure seems scary!, They were likely drilled wrong at source, check hole position against drawing callouts. Call the boys at Vans. Jim in Kelowna From: "Bill Saindon" <wfsaindon(at)clinic.net> Subject: RV-List: Re: RV3-List: Navaid in RV 3, Order Motor Mount with Fuselage > Rick, I can't answer your question about the navaid. But when I built my RV3 > I didn't have any problems with with my engine mount holes lining up. If I > remember right you only drill the holes to 3/16th or so until you get your > mount. Mine lined up perfectly. > > Bill Saindon From: "Richard D. Fogerson" <rickf(at)velocitus.net> > Subject: RV3-List: Navaid in RV 3, Order Motor Mount with Fuselage > > > Hi Everyone, > > I have a couple of questions: > > > > 1) Has anyone installed a Navaid in an RV 3? I'm just wondering if it > > can be installed under the seat like it can be with the larger kits. > > > > 2) I thought it might be a good idea to get the motor mount with the > > fuselage kit since I have heard some stories of people having > > misalignments with the holes that come in the firewall and the mount > > when they get it later in the finish kit. Van's doesn't think it's > > necessary and it would be an extra $860 now rather than later. Any > > opinions out there? > > > > Thanks > > Rick Fogerson ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Sipp" <rsipp(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: RV financing (without longevity at residence or job)
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Subject: RV-List: RV financing (without longevity at residence or job) > > I just got turned down for financing from NAFCO because I just moved and I > just started my job a few months ago. They said my credit was fine, it was > just the longevity factors. I spoke to the head honcho over there and he > admitted that my credit was good but he had to stick by the rules. This > sucks! If the option is available, a home equity loan may provide a lower and perhaps also tax deductable interest payment on a loan. Dick Sipp RV4 250DS Savannah ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CW9371(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 18, 2002
Subject: Re: RV financing (without longevity at residence or job)
In a message dated 3/18/2002 10:50:44 PM Central Standard Time, rsipp(at)earthlink.net writes: > I just got turned down for financing from NAFCO because I just moved and I > > just started my job a few months ago. They said my credit was fine, it > was > > just the longevity factors. I spoke to the head honcho over there and he > > admitted that my credit was good but he had to stick by the rules. This > > sucks! > > If the option is available, a home equity loan may provide a lower and > perhaps also tax deductable interest payment on a loan. > > > Dick Sipp > RV4 250DS > Savannah Talk to textron, they finance RV's ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rob A" <racker(at)rmci.net>
Subject: Fantastic Tip
Date: Mar 18, 2002
> > The stuff is not called fuel lube anymore, but if you call Spruce and ask > for it they will tell you what it is now called. Spruce always has to do things different, and take a long time doing it (my last order took seven months to get right). My preferred supplier, Wicks, calls it fuel lube and the part number is FUEL-LUBE. Checkout http://wicks.overcoffee.com/gotopage.php?page=52 . Rob Acker (RV-6). ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randall Henderson" <randallh(at)attbi.com>
Subject: Re: RV4-List: Auto Oil? (Bad Language)
Date: Mar 18, 2002
> PS:I for one buy my Aeroshell wholesale from a > distributor in large lots, snip How large of lots, and at what kind of savings? I've always thohght our local RV group, with more than 45 flying RVs, ought to be able to come up with some sort of group purchase arrangement.... Randall Henderson, RV-6 N6R (~300 hrs) Portland, OR www.vanshomewing.org ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2002
From: ernie billing <ebilling(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Pneumatic squeezer overhaul?
I found a Chicago Pneumatic CP214 (just like Avery's) squeezer on EBay for $150. Its almost in working order but I think it needs a re-seal. Barely squeezes a -3 rivet at 100PSI. Anyone around sell kits for this or can anyone recommend someone to send it to? Ernie Billing ebilling(at)yahoo.com RV7 - Still on HS San Luis Obispo, CA http://sports.yahoo.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2002
From: John Lawson <jwlawson(at)hargray.com>
Subject: re: Pneumatic squeezer overhaul?
Ernie - send it to Fred Kunkel - he did a terrific job of fixing my squeezer after I tested it for being Marine-proof (i.e., I knocked it off my workbench!). I haven't heard from him lately, but I presume he's still in business - Fred, you up on frequency, and can you help Ernie out? John RV-6 (left wing fuel tank) > From: ernie billing <ebilling(at)yahoo.com> > Subject: RV-List: Pneumatic squeezer overhaul? > > > I found a Chicago Pneumatic CP214 (just like Avery's) > squeezer on EBay for $150. Its almost in working > order but I think it needs a re-seal. Barely squeezes > a -3 rivet at 100PSI. Anyone around sell kits for > this or can anyone recommend someone to send it to? > > Ernie Billing > ebilling(at)yahoo.com > RV7 - Still on HS > San Luis Obispo, CA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Linzel Gray Civ 43CES/CECP <Gray.Linzel(at)pope.af.mil>
Subject: RE: RV3-List Digest: 2 Msgs - 03/18/02
Date: Mar 19, 2002
I ordered my complete rv-3 kit from vans in 1994. It came with a dynafocal mount. Before I finished the plane 18 months later I found a conical mount 0-320 and had to exchange gear and mount that came with my kit. There were no problems that I can remember. Also, I don't believe there was a single pre-drilled hole in the entire kit anyway. Can't help on navaid question. Floating compass is all I have. Gray Southern Pines, NC --> RV3-List message posted by: "Richard D. Fogerson" Hi Everyone, I have a couple of questions: 1) Has anyone installed a Navaid in an RV 3? I'm just wondering if it can be installed under the seat like it can be with the larger kits. 2) I thought it might be a good idea to get the motor mount with the fuselage kit since I have heard some stories of people having misalignments with the holes that come in the firewall and the mount when they get it later in the finish kit. Van's doesn't think it's necessary and it would be an extra $860 now rather than later. Any opinions out there? Thanks Rick Fogerson RV3 fuselage soon (yeehaw!) Boise, ID ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Donald Mei" <don_mei(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: Preflight Briefing
Date: Mar 19, 2002
Whew Kyle, I was about to tell you how much of a WACKO you were to put a 300# Pax in an RV-4. You said you were worried about gross, and I'm thinking what the hell about CG, man this guy is dead in 2 years if he didn't come back from that flight thinking that that was the spookiest airplane he'd ever flown. Then I realized you had a '6. Sorry for doubting you. Don Mei (no 300# pax please) RV-4 3B9 - Chester, CT ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Pinholes
From: Eric.J.Henson(at)chase.com
Date: Mar 19, 2002
08:07:41 AM Austin, get some K36 from the local ppg dealer. Reduce it a bit with MEK and just pour it ahead of a squeegee. Just trowl the thing as you go. Then when it drys do an initial sand with about 180 grit and your pinhole problems will be gone. I learned this from a guy who de-pinholed an entire Thunder Mustang in about 8 hours, the conventional way would have taken weeks. Eric "Austin" <6430(at)axion.net>(at)matronics.com on 01/04/80 07:02:35 PM Please respond to rv-list(at)matronics.com Sent by: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com cc: Subject: RV-List: Pinholes Hi Listers, I spent 4 hours yesterday shooting primer on all my fibreglass parts and was blown away..no pun intended...at the appearance of pinholes in the S cowl.... Until you shoot a prime on it, it is just not visible as to how porous it looks. GAWD, it looks just like screen mesh for a screen door....I know my primer ain't going to fill that..have you seen the same ? What is the best remedy to fill before thinking about top color ? I did try some superfill and epoxy over part of it but the results were not too great and it is very labor intensive for such a big area....what have you guys done ?? Any input appreciated. Thanks, Austin Vancouver. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ABAYMAN(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 19, 2002
Subject: Re: anyone has more info?
IDENTIFICATION Regis#: 491T Make/Model: EXP Description: EXP-1991 RV-4 Date: 03/15/2002 Time: 2145 Event Type: Accident Highest Injury: Fatal Mid Air: N Missing: N Damage: Destroyed LOCATION City: JACUMBA State: CA Country: US DESCRIPTION EXPERIMENTAL ACFT CRASHED UNDER UNKNOWN CIRCUMSTANCES AND WAS DESTROYED BY FIRE, THE PILOT/SOLE OCCUPANT SUFFERED FATAL INJURIES, JACUMBA, CA. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2002
Subject: Re: Pre-Flight Passenger Briefings
From: Denis Walsh <deniswalsh(at)earthlink.net>
Good thoughts, Ken. This is a real safety issue, and I hope everyone reads and heeds your guidance. I am up to about 300 dual rides in my RV-6A, and a few scary events while in the Air Force. One thing I would add. My procedures evolved to ever more simple rules as I had experiences like yours. One perhaps worth passing on to add to your excellent words: My rule is to ALWAYS stand beside the passenger and point to where he/she is to step, where to put hands where to place butt, and how to step on my beloved seat (with a towel on it). When they get in, I personally strap them in, regardless of age, weight or sex. (one time of having the starboard seat belt enclose the rudder cable is enough). I then show them how to adjust the straps, put the headset on them, and go to the other side. At this point you can decide about the stick removal. If I had a tandem, the rule would be always remove the stick. > From: KBoatri144(at)aol.com > Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 21:33:42 EST > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV-List: Pre-Flight Passenger Briefings > > > I had an interesting experience the other day that reminded me of how > important preflight passenger briefings are. > > A gentleman called me at work, introduced himself as someone I met at an EAA > meeting, and asked if he could get a ride in the RV. I remembered one guy > from our last meeting who was considering an RV-4, and had asked for a ride > whenever we could get together. Being terrible with names, I form a mental > picture of the RV-4 guy who is maybe 5'9, 170 lbs, and say OK. We make > arrangements to meet at an airport convenient to him. After work, off I go, > and meet him at the designated airport. > > After landing, I'm directed to park on the ramp beside a BeechJet. I stop > the airplane, recognize my passenger on sight, and realize that this isn't > the person I expected. This guy is 6'2, 300+ pounds. With me sitting in the > cockpit and him standing on the pilot's side of the airplane, we chit chat > for a minute, and the BeechJet pilots come up and ask if I want to trade > airplanes for a trip around the pattern. I told the BeechJet guys that I'd > be glad to, but they would have to show me how to start the engines, and I > was kind of in a hurry. Maybe next time? They look disappointed. > > About then, I tell my passenger "Let's get you in the airplane, 'cause its > gonna be dark in an hour and I want to be home before then". Before I can > untangle myself from the headsets and unbuckle the harness, he darts around > the plane and is quickly standing on the right wing. I'm thinking "I hope he > only stepped on the wing walk, not a flap or something". Before this thought > clears, he begins to climb into the cockpit using the sliding canopy and the > roll-over fairing as his handholds. I tell him "WOAH Big Fella", and explain > what he can and CANNOT grab as he climbs in. > > About that time, I'm thinking that we're right at my gross weight of 1675 > pounds, and he simply isn't gonna get a very good ride, because I don't yank > the airplane around at those weights, and takeoff and climb performance are > degraded. > > We get him buckled in, I crank the engine, and go to retract the flaps. His > butt is in the way of the flap handle. With some deft manipulation he pulls > his left cheek out of the way so I can raise the flaps. As I'm talking to > ground control and (later) the tower, he's just talking away over there, > without regard to whether I need to hear what the FAA guys are saying. > > In my one smart move of the day, I have him remove the copilot's stick just > to make sure I have full control movement (big stomach and thighs on this > guy) on takeoff. > > Finally, we launch, using a lot of runway (for an RV, anyway), and as we > depart, he's still talking. Despite my hints, he continued to talk for > almost the entire flight. Later, when we returned to the field, I finally > had to ask him to keep quiet unless he saw something wrong. > > The flight itself was uneventful. After a while, I had him reinstall the > stick on the copilot's side, and allowed him to fly for a while. The first > minute or so, I kept my hand on the stick as a damper, and made sure to > remind him of how sensitive the airplane was. This was a good move too, > because he was inclined to overcontrol. Once he got the feel of the > airplane, he was fine... > > I did have him remove the copilots stick before we landed. > > After I dropped him off and returned to my home field, I checked the sheet > metal on the right wing. It was getting dark, but I could see heel marks > where his shoes had scuffed across the wing. The heel marks rubbed out with > thumb pressure, and I don't THINK there are any dents, but it was too dark to > tell. I'll check later. > > What did I learn for next time? > > 1) I'll know exactly who I'm giving a ride to before I agree. I'll also have > a good idea of their size. If there is any question, I'll clarify before > agreeing to give the ride. > > 2) I'll make sure the prospective passenger knows not to touch the aircraft > until I explicitly explain where the handholds and footholds are. (Aside: > Why is it that people who walk up to your airplane when you're sitting in it > like to lean on the canopy? Also, why do people at airshows do the same thing > when they want to look at the panel? I HATE it when people touch the plexi. > Too expensive, too much time to build, too fragile, too easily scratched, and > too hard to repair!) > > 3) I'll explain my "quiet cockpit" rule, which applies within 10 miles of > ANY airport. This rule is that unless the passenger sees a potential traffic > conflict, or sees something else amiss, s/he needs to be quiet so I can hear > the radio. > > Believe it or not, I have always followed these three rules (until this > flight). In this case, I got sloppy because of time considerations. > > This fellow isn't on the RV-list, so I don't feel bad about publishing this > here. However, I ask that it NOT be posted elsewhere. No need to embarrass > the guy if he goes web-searching one day... > > Kyle Boatright > 0-320/Aymar Demuth RV-6 Slider > Kennesaw, GA > http://www.angelfire.com/my/rv6 > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2002
From: Al Mojzisik <prober(at)iwaynet.net>
Subject: Re: anyone has more info?
This is from Landings......Don't know if he was flying it though..... My condolences to family and friends.......... AL N-number : N491T Aircraft Serial Number : 891 Aircraft Manufacturer : TRENTI MARIO FRANK Model : RV-4 Engine Manufacturer : LYCOMING Model : 0-320 SERIES Aircraft Year : 1991 Owner Name : TRENTI MARIO F Owner Address : PO BOX 546 JACUMBA, CA, 91934-0546 Registration Date : 30-Oct-1990 Airworthiness Certificate Type : Experimental Approved Operations : Amateur Built > >IDENTIFICATION > Regis#: 491T Make/Model: EXP Description: EXP-1991 RV-4 > Date: 03/15/2002 Time: 2145 > > Event Type: Accident Highest Injury: Fatal Mid Air: N Missing: N > Damage: Destroyed > >LOCATION > City: JACUMBA State: CA Country: US > >DESCRIPTION > EXPERIMENTAL ACFT CRASHED UNDER UNKNOWN CIRCUMSTANCES AND WAS DESTROYED BY > FIRE, THE PILOT/SOLE OCCUPANT SUFFERED FATAL INJURIES, JACUMBA, CA. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bruce Meacham" <bruce_meacham(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: RV3-List: Navaid in RV 3, Order Motor Mount with Fuselage
Date: Mar 19, 2002
Rick, I think your on your own. When your done, would you mind posting your results? I'd be interested in reading how it went. Thanks, -Bruce ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard D. Fogerson" <rickf(at)velocitus.net> Subject: RV3-List: Navaid in RV 3, Order Motor Mount with Fuselage > --> RV3-List message posted by: "Richard D. Fogerson" > > Hi Everyone, > I have a couple of questions: > > 1) Has anyone installed a Navaid in an RV 3? I'm just wondering if it > can be installed under the seat like it can be with the larger kits. > > 2) I thought it might be a good idea to get the motor mount with the > fuselage kit since I have heard some stories of people having > misalignments with the holes that come in the firewall and the mount > when they get it later in the finish kit. Van's doesn't think it's > necessary and it would be an extra $860 now rather than later. Any > opinions out there? > > Thanks > Rick Fogerson > RV3 fuselage soon (yeehaw!) > Boise, ID > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Joe Larson" <jpl(at)showpage.org>
Subject: RV-7 construction speed
Date: Mar 19, 2002
> The new tail was completed yesterday after about 10 hours of very easy work. > Only had to drill out one rivet. 10 hours? For crying out loud! I know I'm not Mr. Speedy, but I think I had around 200 hours on my RV-6 tail. I know, it should have been less than that, but still.... 10 hours. Dana, is the rest of the kit done to a similar level as the tail? For instance, are the wing ribs pre-punched? I think I'm going to go cry now. I'd be further along in my kit if I'd waited for the RV-7 than starting 5 years before it came out. (Of course, two moves, one divorce, several rather extensive job contracts, and a number of home improvement projects DID interfere, but I'd STILL be further ahead now...) -J ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Pre-Flight Passenger Briefings
Date: Mar 19, 2002
> > >Good thoughts, Ken. This is a real safety issue, and I hope everyone reads >and heeds your guidance. > Yes indeed. After one old timer in the back seat of my -8 almost tore the wings off the plane by hamfisting the stick, I have since conducted all dual flights/rides as if they no NOTHING about airplanes. They do not approach the airplane for the flight without me being right next to them. They do not get in without me telling them exactly how to do so. I strap them in, show them what they can and cannot touch, and how the flight will be conducted. They do not insert the stick (which is stowed in broomstick clips on the seat back) to fly until I say so, and they follow me through on some turns while being cautioned as to the sensitivity of the controls. This is especially emphasized for pitch inputs, with the more aft CG when flying dual. When they are flying the airplane, my hand is very close to the stick, to arrest any sudden inputs. This has worked well so far. Brian Denk RV8 N94BD MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Konrad Werner" <Connywerner(at)wans.net>
Subject: Re: anyone has more info?
Date: Mar 19, 2002
As per a www.landings.com database search, the RV-4 was registered as follows: N-number : N491T Aircraft Serial Number : 891 Aircraft Manufacturer : TRENTI MARIO FRANK Model : RV-4 Engine Manufacturer : LYCOMING Model : 0-320 SERIES Aircraft Year : 1991 Owner Name : TRENTI MARIO F Owner Address : PO BOX 546 / JACUMBA, CA, 91934-0546 Registration Date : 30-Oct-1990 Airworthiness Certificate Type : Experimental Approved Operations : Amateur Built I have no info on the cause of the accident. K. ----- Original Message ----- From: <ABAYMAN(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: anyone has more info? > > IDENTIFICATION > Regis#: 491T Make/Model: EXP Description: EXP-1991 RV-4 > Date: 03/15/2002 Time: 2145 > > Event Type: Accident Highest Injury: Fatal Mid Air: N Missing: N > Damage: Destroyed > > LOCATION > City: JACUMBA State: CA Country: US > > DESCRIPTION > EXPERIMENTAL ACFT CRASHED UNDER UNKNOWN CIRCUMSTANCES AND WAS DESTROYED BY > FIRE, THE PILOT/SOLE OCCUPANT SUFFERED FATAL INJURIES, JACUMBA, CA. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2002
From: "Rodney Boyd" <rboyd(at)dcccd.edu>
Subject: Re: anyone has more info?
Name is not familiar. RV listers are also asking who..... >>> prober(at)iwaynet.net 3/19/02 8:23:23 AM >>> This is from Landings......Don't know if he was flying it though..... My condolences to family and friends.......... AL N-number : N491T Aircraft Serial Number : 891 Aircraft Manufacturer : TRENTI MARIO FRANK Model : RV-4 Engine Manufacturer : LYCOMING Model : 0-320 SERIES Aircraft Year : 1991 Owner Name : TRENTI MARIO F Owner Address : PO BOX 546 JACUMBA, CA, 91934-0546 Registration Date : 30-Oct-1990 Airworthiness Certificate Type : Experimental Approved Operations : Amateur Built > >IDENTIFICATION > Regis#: 491T Make/Model: EXP Description: EXP-1991 RV-4 > Date: 03/15/2002 Time: 2145 > > Event Type: Accident Highest Injury: Fatal Mid Air: N Missing: N > Damage: Destroyed > >LOCATION > City: JACUMBA State: CA Country: US > >DESCRIPTION > EXPERIMENTAL ACFT CRASHED UNDER UNKNOWN CIRCUMSTANCES AND WAS DESTROYED BY > FIRE, THE PILOT/SOLE OCCUPANT SUFFERED FATAL INJURIES, JACUMBA, CA. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2002
From: "Builder's Bookstore" <winterland(at)rkymtnhi.com>
Subject: breakway stick - was Pre-Flight Briefings
> Yes indeed. After one old timer in the back seat of my -8 almost tore the > wings off the plane by hamfisting the stick, It would be interesting, and probably not too hard to build some type of break-away function into the rear stick. Perhaps some type of plastic link in the rear stick that would quickly fail in the event that the pilot and passenger got themselves into some kind of arm wrestle at 200 kts. Andy ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Patty Gillies" <d020205(at)vm.sc.edu>
Subject: Cessna wrinkle paint
Date: Mar 19, 2002
Bob, We powder coated our panel a textured gray and it looks great. Patty Gillies RV-6 gillies-patty(at)sc.edu -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Bob Japundza Subject: RV-List: Cessna wrinkle paint Hi Folks, Could anyone tell me a where I can get the grey wrinkle paint that Cessna uses on the panels of their new 172/182/206's? I'm sure it'd be three times the cost if I ordered it from Cessna. Bob Japundza RV-6 N244BJ O-360CS flying 275 hours building F1 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2002
From: Bill VonDane <bvondane(at)cso.atmel.com>
Subject: Hinge Pins
"Rv8list@Egroups" Hi all... I need to get some new hinge pins for my flaps... Can someone tell me the diameter of the pin? I forgot to bring one with me today... I am going to get some SS pins from the local welding supply house... The reason I am getting new pins is that the original method I planned to use will not work: http://vondane.com/rv8a/wing/wings5.htm, the aileron bracket hit the pin and doesn't allow full travel... So now I am going to remove an eye in the middle of the flap hinge and use two pins that go out from the center... The tails of the pins will be bent in such a way that they will hook into holes in the flap brace to hold them in place... I have seen pictures of this installation, but can't remember where... If you know where these pictures are, please post them here for others to see... -Bill VonDane Colorado Springs, CO RV-8A - N8WV http://vondane.com/rv8a/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Nellis" <mike(at)bmnellis.com>
Subject: Re: [rv8list] Hinge Pins
Date: Mar 19, 2002
That's cause you don't pay attention to anything I do or say. http://bmnellis.com/images/Wings/Flaps/DCP01831.JPG Mike ----- Original Message ----- From: Bill VonDane To: Rv-List ; vansairforce(at)yahoogroups.com ; Rv8list@Egroups Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:34 AM Subject: [rv8list] Hinge Pins Hi all... I need to get some new hinge pins for my flaps... Can someone tell me the diameter of the pin? I forgot to bring one with me today... I am going to get some SS pins from the local welding supply house... The reason I am getting new pins is that the original method I planned to use will not work: http://vondane.com/rv8a/wing/wings5.htm, the aileron bracket hit the pin and doesn't allow full travel... So now I am going to remove an eye in the middle of the flap hinge and use two pins that go out from the center... The tails of the pins will be bent in such a way that they will hook into holes in the flap brace to hold them in place... I have seen pictures of this installation, but can't remember where... If you know where these pictures are, please post them here for others to see... -Bill VonDane Colorado Springs, CO RV-8A - N8WV http://vondane.com/rv8a/ ADVERTISEMENT Information exchange for builders of Vans Aircraft RV-8 kits. IF YOU WISH TO UNSUBSCRIBE, PLEASE SEND AN EMAIL TO : rv8list-unsubscribe(at)egroups.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Michel Boucher" <michelboucher594(at)rogers.com>
Subject: Navaid in RV 3, Order Motor Mount with Fuselage
Date: Mar 19, 2002
I had installed my S-tec servo under the left hand step panel of my RV3. This was done when the wings were off for its modification. Had managed to attach the torque tube directly to the bolt at the control stick. Snug fit but it worked perfectly for some 4 years. Unfortunately don't have any pictures and I have recently removed it to install it in the 8 I'm building. Sure preferred the simple torque tube set-up then the cable nightmare that is recommended for the 8. Michel 81117 RV-3 C-GGRV 1,100 hrs -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Richard D. Fogerson Subject: RV-List: Navaid in RV 3, Order Motor Mount with Fuselage Hi Everyone, I have a couple of questions: 1) Has anyone installed a Navaid in an RV 3? I'm just wondering if it can be installed under the seat like it can be with the larger kits. 2) I thought it might be a good idea to get the motor mount with the fuselage kit since I have heard some stories of people having misalignments with the holes that come in the firewall and the mount when they get it later in the finish kit. Van's doesn't think it's necessary and it would be an extra $860 now rather than later. Any opinions out there? Thanks Rick Fogerson RV3 fuselage soon (yeehaw!) Boise, ID ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2002
From: "Owens, Laird" <Owens(at)aerovironment.com>
Subject: Pre-Flight Passenger Briefings
Bill, I leave mine unpinned and the PTT switch is on the panel. That way I can take it out at a seconds notice and beat my passenger with it in case they start acting up.....Of course I don't tell them it's removable in case they want to beat me with it after some "adventurous manoeuvre" they didn't appreciate. Laird SoCal From: rv-list(at)matronics.com on Tue, Mar 19, 2002 9:23 AM Subject: RE: RV-List: Pre-Flight Passenger Briefings What are you guys using to install the rear or pax sticks? Bolts, or pins or what? -Bill -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Brian Denk Subject: Re: RV-List: Pre-Flight Passenger Briefings > > >Good thoughts, Ken. This is a real safety issue, and I hope everyone >reads and heeds your guidance. > Yes indeed. After one old timer in the back seat of my -8 almost tore the wings off the plane by hamfisting the stick, I have since conducted all dual flights/rides as if they no NOTHING about airplanes. They do not approach the airplane for the flight without me being right next to them. They do not get in without me telling them exactly how to do so. I strap them in, show them what they can and cannot touch, and how the flight will be conducted. They do not insert the stick (which is stowed in broomstick clips on the seat back) to fly until I say so, and they follow me through on some turns while being cautioned as to the sensitivity of the controls. This is especially emphasized for pitch inputs, with the more aft CG when flying dual. When they are flying the airplane, my hand is very close to the stick, to arrest any sudden inputs. This has worked well so far. Brian Denk RV8 N94BD MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: anyone has more info?
Date: Mar 19, 2002
N-number : N491T Aircraft Serial Number : 891 Aircraft Manufacturer : TRENTI MARIO FRANK Model : RV-4 Engine Manufacturer : LYCOMING Model : 0-320 SERIES Aircraft Year : 1991 Owner Name : TRENTI MARIO F Owner Address : PO BOX 546 JACUMBA, CA, 91934-0546 Registration Date : 30-Oct-1990 Airworthiness Certificate Type : Experimental Approved Operations : Amateur Built ----- Original Message ----- From: <ABAYMAN(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: anyone has more info? IDENTIFICATION Regis#: 491T Make/Model: EXP Description: EXP-1991 RV-4 Date: 03/15/2002 Time: 2145 Event Type: Accident Highest Injury: Fatal Mid Air: N Missing: N Damage: Destroyed LOCATION City: JACUMBA State: CA Country: US DESCRIPTION EXPERIMENTAL ACFT CRASHED UNDER UNKNOWN CIRCUMSTANCES AND WAS DESTROYED BY FIRE, THE PILOT/SOLE OCCUPANT SUFFERED FATAL INJURIES, JACUMBA, CA. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rick Caldwell" <racaldwell(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Pre-Flight Passenger Briefings
Date: Mar 19, 2002
> >Good thoughts, Ken. This is a real safety issue, and I hope everyone >reads > >and heeds your guidance. I used to like carrying passengers but after some unpleasant and/or eyeopening experiences, that we all chance into, I've stopped asking people if they want to ride. If I'm asked and the asker fits the right profile, then it's OK with me. Sometimes I think I might as well have a single seater now. A couple more experiences to add to those already given. I keep my passenger stick & headset out of the plane except when needed. My headset is plugged into the Pilot side of the intercom. I hand the passenger (who's flown many times with me) their headset and plug it into the intercom. I then get everything situated, crank up, taxi out & call Ground. My radio is very garbbled, they say. After sitting there forever it seemed swapping wires, radio checks, etc. I then realized my passenger put on my headset, not the one I handed to 'em. They both look alike. Another time I had my passenger seated and I reached over to fasten their seatbelt. As I pulled it tight, he freaked out. Got a bad case of closterphobia. He almost ripped of my rollbar fairing trying to get out. Good thing I was sitting on the ground in front of my hangar. Another time I had had just started some 3D flight about 20 miles south. A steep turn, a wingover, then a barrel roll. Then, I had no problem telling that my passenger had banana pancakes for breakfast a little earlier. Another time I had a former fighter pilot in the right seat. I asked what manuever would he do if he had someone trying to shoot his tail off. He showed me. He pulled 6 g's continously throughout a barrel roll. Fortunately we are both 140 pounders & only half fuel on board. No problems with the airframe. At least now I know the RV-6 is a capable 2 person aerobatic machine. But if I knew before hand I would be testing the airframe beyond previous limits, I'd be wearing my parachute. I'm almost positive my next project will be a single seater. Rick Caldwell RV-6 320 hrs Melbourne, FL Do Not Achive ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2002
From: Bill VonDane <bvondane(at)cso.atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [rv8list] Hinge Pins
vansairforce(at)yahoogroups.com This is not the picture I was referring to... What I am talking about it taking the tails that you have bent to 90 degrees and keeping them longer so they can hook into the flap brace holes to secure them... -Bill -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mike Nellis Subject: RV-List: Re: [rv8list] Hinge Pins That's cause you don't pay attention to anything I do or say. http://bmnellis.com/images/Wings/Flaps/DCP01831.JPG Mike ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "lucky macy" <luckymacy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Pre-Flight Passenger Briefings
Date: Mar 19, 2002
you should've waited for the 8qb kit and built it. You just put the people baggagge in the back with a bag and ignore them until the wheels are "back in the chalks" at the end of the flight. lucky a sometimes rick caldwell passenger and real slow RV-8A builder :-) >From: "Rick Caldwell" <racaldwell(at)hotmail.com> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV-List: Pre-Flight Passenger Briefings >Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 17:59:28 +0000 > > > > >Good thoughts, Ken. This is a real safety issue, and I hope everyone > >reads > > >and heeds your guidance. > > >I used to like carrying passengers but after some unpleasant and/or >eyeopening experiences, that we all chance into, I've stopped asking people >if they want to ride. If I'm asked and the asker fits the right profile, >then it's OK with me. Sometimes I think I might as well have a single >seater >now. A couple more experiences to add to those already given. > >I keep my passenger stick & headset out of the plane except when needed. My >headset is plugged into the Pilot side of the intercom. I hand the >passenger >(who's flown many times with me) their headset and plug it into the >intercom. I then get everything situated, crank up, taxi out & call Ground. >My radio is very garbbled, they say. After sitting there forever it seemed >swapping wires, radio checks, etc. I then realized my passenger put on my >headset, not the one I handed to 'em. They both look alike. > >Another time I had my passenger seated and I reached over to fasten their >seatbelt. As I pulled it tight, he freaked out. Got a bad case of >closterphobia. He almost ripped of my rollbar fairing trying to get out. >Good thing I was sitting on the ground in front of my hangar. > >Another time I had had just started some 3D flight about 20 miles south. A >steep turn, a wingover, then a barrel roll. Then, I had no problem telling >that my passenger had banana pancakes for breakfast a little earlier. > >Another time I had a former fighter pilot in the right seat. I asked what >manuever would he do if he had someone trying to shoot his tail off. He >showed me. He pulled 6 g's continously throughout a barrel roll. >Fortunately >we are both 140 pounders & only half fuel on board. No problems with the >airframe. At least now I know the RV-6 is a capable 2 person aerobatic >machine. But if I knew before hand I would be testing the airframe beyond >previous limits, I'd be wearing my parachute. > >I'm almost positive my next project will be a single seater. > >Rick Caldwell >RV-6 320 hrs Melbourne, FL >Do Not Achive > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dana Overall" <bo124rs(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: RV-7 construction speed
Date: Mar 19, 2002
> > > The new tail was completed yesterday after about 10 hours of very easy >work. > > Only had to drill out one rivet. > >10 hours? For crying out loud! I know I'm not Mr. Speedy, but I think >I had around 200 hours on my RV-6 tail. I know, it should have been less >than that, but still.... > Joe the 10 hours max was on the VS alone. My CPA practice is in my home and I don't start until 9AM. My son gets on the bus at 7:30 so I have about an hour in the morning to piddle. A little time at lunch and about 1.5 hrs in the evening. With this sch. I will have the HS done this weekend and start on the control surfaces. I am truly not rushing it. I have the HS skeleton clecoed together now. I'll take it apart this evening and start deburring. I'll cleco it back together probably Friday and rivet over the weekend. Everything, and I mean everything (that is except for the HS405 & 406) is predrilled perfectly. I spend most of my time deburring, that is the truth. They just started shipping the totally pre punched emps in January. I'm figuring less than 50 hours to do the entire emp., and that is with a lot of head scratching. I've been a little leary of posting this:-), for fear of retaliation but what the heck:-). Three weeks, part time work and you will have the new "slow build" emp. together. You can see the 10 hours of work at the bottom of the emp. page listed below. You can also see a shot of the pre drilled ribs. Ordered my wings today!! I'm sure it will slow down here pretty soon. Life in the slow lane!! Dana Overall Richmond, KY 7 emp. http://63.69.213.180/newtech/danas_airplane_factory/project.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HCRV6(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 19, 2002
Subject: Panel labeling questions
Just curious. What are you folks who are using crinkle type finishes on your instrument panel using to label your switches, etc.? A related question; I have seen some really nice engraved strips (plastic I think) that mount under a row of switches but I was never able to find out how or where they were made. Anybody out there know of a source for these things? Harry Crosby Pleasanton, California RV-6, electrical ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JusCash(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 19, 2002
Subject: Crotch Strap Mount
Does anyone know of a web site with picture's showing how the crotch strap anchors where installed? Cash Copeland Oakland, Ca ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "C. Rabaut" <crabaut(at)coalinga.com>
Subject: Gascolator pressure Limits
Date: Mar 19, 2002
Hi Guys (& gals), I just pressure tested my new plumbing for my IO-320 boost pump from "Airflow Performance" (cost $508.58 O.T.D.). The pump went to almost 50 PSI when I first flipped it on and blew out my rubber seal on my gascolator (the one I bought from Van's). Other folks have told me that Van's gascolator could/would support the boost pumps up to about 40-50 PSI. Anyone with any comments, suggestions, humorous remarks... ? Yes, I will probably cough-up the bucks and buy an AnAir gascolator (anyone got one for sale/re-sale?), if I have too... But I was tryin' to save up for the Christen inverted oil system (anyone got one of these for cheap?). I called "Don" at Airflow Performance and he said their boost pump should normalize at about 30 PSI and he even commented that Van's gascolator should work okay, "Other guys have used them...". Okay, I'll take my replies "off-air". Thanks, Chuck ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Pre-Flight Passenger Briefings
Date: Mar 19, 2002
> >My hats off to any of you guys who actually will give somebody a ride in >your RV. I have come to the conclusion that my 8 will probably be the first >RV I fly in. I have walked around RVs with $100.00 bills hanging out of my >pockets as gas money and I have indeed asked (very courteously ) for a >trip >around the pattern so I could actually feel what it was I was building , >but >to no avail.I weigh 200 and a slim 200 at that, so the excuses about CG and >over weight seem not to hold water. It's really OK though, everyone has the >right to fly whomever and whenever they choose in their plane, and I do >understand that is only through generousity that I'll get the ride. Hell, I >even flew commercial to Lakeland to the mini fly in hopeing to catch a ride >with no luck. I did however see some great planes and pick a few brains and >walk the beach with the wife, so it was a good trip just the same. I >promise >that when I finish, the back seat of my 8 will be available to new builders >who need some inspiration. > >Tom in Ky. RV 8 1012 waiting on finish kit Tom, 200 lbs?? No problem! Get yer butt over to New Mexico and you can ride with me anytime. Don't need $100 either. Lunch and Beer works for me. Brian Denk RV8 N94BD happy ride giver and proud of it ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Albwertz(at)cs.com
Date: Mar 19, 2002
Subject: Re: Hinge Pins
The diagram appeared in the "AVIATOR" ....Van's publication. regards ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stein Bruch" <stein(at)steinair.com>
Subject: Gascolator pressure Limits
Date: Mar 19, 2002
Hi Chuck, I'm assuming you have the Airflow performance filter also?? Personally, I would not want a gascolator in my system since I'm using the higher pressure fuel injection. I know this may start a war, but I'd leave the gascolator out all together. It's just another point to induce leaks into the system. Normal systems are picky about leaks, but the injection is even pickier about small air leaks. Hope this helps, Stein Bruch P.S., Call wentworth aircraft and see if they have a Christen setup. I got mine off a ground looped pitts for about 60% of new cost. Subject: RV-List: Gascolator pressure Limits Hi Guys (& gals), I just pressure tested my new plumbing for my IO-320 boost pump from "Airflow Performance" (cost $508.58 O.T.D.). The pump went to almost 50 PSI when I first flipped it on and blew out my rubber seal on my gascolator (the one I bought from Van's). Other folks have told me that Van's gascolator could/would support the boost pumps up to about 40-50 PSI. Anyone with any comments, suggestions, humorous remarks... ? Yes, I will probably cough-up the bucks and buy an AnAir gascolator (anyone got one for sale/re-sale?), if I have too... But I was tryin' to save up for the Christen inverted oil system (anyone got one of these for cheap?). I called "Don" at Airflow Performance and he said their boost pump should normalize at about 30 PSI and he even commented that Van's gascolator should work okay, "Other guys have used them...". Okay, I'll take my replies "off-air". Thanks, Chuck ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "C J Heitman" <cjh(at)execpc.com>
Subject: Gascolator pressure Limits
Date: Mar 19, 2002
Chuck, My Airflow Performance pump assembly was furnished with a 25 psi pressure relief valve plumbed into it. Yours may be stuck closed, installed backwards or somehow plumbed incorrectly. I have mine piped back to the outlet of the fuel selector so that the fuel has a chance to cool before returning to the pump when being bypassed. I would be concerned with damaging the injection servo with a pressure that high. Chris Heitman Dousman WI RV-9A N94ME (reserved) http://www.execpc.com/~cjh/rv9a.html -----Original Message----- Hi Guys (& gals), I just pressure tested my new plumbing for my IO-320 boost pump from "Airflow Performance" (cost $508.58 O.T.D.). The pump went to almost 50 PSI when I first flipped it on and blew out my rubber seal on my gascolator (the one I bought from Van's). Other folks have told me that Van's gascolator could/would support the boost pumps up to about 40-50 PSI. Anyone with any comments, suggestions, humorous remarks... ? Yes, I will probably cough-up the bucks and buy an AnAir gascolator (anyone got one for sale/re-sale?), if I have too... But I was tryin' to save up for the Christen inverted oil system (anyone got one of these for cheap?). I called "Don" at Airflow Performance and he said their boost pump should normalize at about 30 PSI and he even commented that Van's gascolator should work okay, "Other guys have used them...". Okay, I'll take my replies "off-air". Thanks, Chuck ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Planejoel(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 19, 2002
Subject: Re: Pre-Flight Passenger Briefings
Tom I have taken people up in my 6A. During my building time I did bum a couple rides. I think what makes the guy's a little reluctant is law suite. It's really a shame we have to pay the legal system a percentage of anything we do. I think the MAFIA was better. RV6A Joe ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2002
From: Larry Bowen <lcbowen(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Hinge Pins
Maybe here: http://Bowenaero.com/pix/wings22.jpg Not flying yet .... -Larry http://BowenAero.com --- Bill VonDane wrote: > > Hi all... > > I need to get some new hinge pins for my flaps... Can someone tell me > the diameter of the pin? I forgot to bring one with me today... I am > going to get some SS pins from the local welding supply house... > > The reason I am getting new pins is that the original method I planned > to use will not work: http://vondane.com/rv8a/wing/wings5.htm, the > aileron bracket hit the pin and doesn't allow full travel... > > So now I am going to remove an eye in the middle of the flap hinge and > use two pins that go out from the center... The tails of the pins will > be bent in such a way that they will hook into holes in the flap brace > to hold them in place... > > I have seen pictures of this installation, but can't remember where... > If you know where these pictures are, please post them here for others > to see... > > -Bill VonDane > Colorado Springs, CO > RV-8A - N8WV > http://vondane.com/rv8a/ > > > > > > > > http://sports.yahoo.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Eustace Bowhay" <ebowhay(at)jetstream.net>
Subject: Re: 1/8 Inch Copper Priming Line Source
Date: Mar 19, 2002
Hi Mike: Did you find the tubing? If not I have some on hand, let me know the length and could put it in the mail (priority post) and you should have it in 3-4 days. Eustace Bowhay ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Thompson" <grobdriver(at)yahoo.com> Subject: RV-List: 1/8 Inch Copper Priming Line Source > > Hi Folks, > > I don't remember how I went about estimating how much of the 1/8-inch > copper tubing I would need to plumb the primer, but I have come up 6 > inches short. > > I have not found any in that size at the usual places (Home Depot, > Lowes, Hobby store) and am wondering if anyone has found an unexpected > local-to-a-fair-sized-city source of this stuff. I've padded the > subject line for the future because it appears from an archive search > that others are more clever then me and haven't run into this problem. > > Haven't been to a small-motor shop (read lawn-mower repair) but don't > even know if those type machines even use it. > > Hate to order a foot and pay their shipping and worst of all, have to > wait! > > At this end of the project things get impatient, as some of you know. > > Thanks! > > Mike Thompson > Austin, TX > -6 N140RV (Reserved) > Firewall Forward > > > http://sports.yahoo.com/ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2002
From: Larry Bowen <lcbowen(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Pre-Flight Passenger Briefings
Are all these reasons discussed, justification for significantly shortening the rear stick, so the PIC has the mechanical advantage over the pax? -Larry --- Brian Denk wrote: > > Yes indeed. After one old timer in the back seat of my -8 almost tore the > wings off the plane by hamfisting the stick, I have since conducted all dual > flights/rides as if they no NOTHING about airplanes. They do not approach > the airplane for the flight without me being right next to them. They do > not get in without me telling them exactly how to do so. I strap them in, > show them what they can and cannot touch, and how the flight will be > conducted. They do not insert the stick (which is stowed in broomstick > clips on the seat back) to fly until I say so, and they follow me through on > some turns while being cautioned as to the sensitivity of the controls. > This is especially emphasized for pitch inputs, with the more aft CG when > flying dual. When they are flying the airplane, my hand is very close to > the stick, to arrest any sudden inputs. This has worked well so far. > > Brian Denk > RV8 N94BD > http://sports.yahoo.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Pre-Flight Passenger Briefings
Date: Mar 19, 2002
> > >Are all these reasons discussed, justification for significantly shortening >the >rear stick, so the PIC has the mechanical advantage over the pax? > >-Larry > > I wouldn't recommend it. A shorter stick will only exaggerate the "sensitivity factor" felt by an RV8 newbie. If you have to get into a tug of war with the GIB, you made a reeallly bad choice to let him/her in there in the first place. All ya gotta do is smack 'em on the shins to get their attention. Aforementioned shins are usually right next to you and are prime targets of opportunity. :) Brian Denk RV8 N94BD ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JusCash(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 19, 2002
Subject: Crotch Strap
Does anyone know of a web site with picture's showing how the crotch strap anchors where installed? Cash Copeland Oakland, Ca ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Nellis" <mike(at)bmnellis.com>
Subject: Re: Pre-Flight Passenger Briefings
Date: Mar 19, 2002
I don't know the dia. of the hinge pin since everything is packed away. Sorry ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stan Blanton" <stanb(at)door.net>
Subject: Re: Crotch Strap Mount
Date: Mar 19, 2002
> Does anyone know of a web site with picture's showing how the crotch strap > anchors where installed? > > Cash Copeland > Oakland, Ca > Here's some pictures of an installation. http://www.edt.com/homewing/rhproject/restraints.html Stan Blanton ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2002
From: Rob Prior <rv7(at)b4.ca>
Subject: Re: Pre-Flight Passenger Briefings
Sounds like a perfect job for the canopy breaking hammer/tool... Tool, meet shins. Shins, meet tool. Ah, now I have control again. Perfect! (making a mental note to wear shin-guards the next time I get a ride in the back of an RV-8... 8-) -RB4 Brian Denk wrote: >I wouldn't recommend it. A shorter stick will only exaggerate the >"sensitivity factor" felt by an RV8 newbie. If you have to get into a tug >of war with the GIB, you made a reeallly bad choice to let him/her in there >in the first place. All ya gotta do is smack 'em on the shins to get their >attention. Aforementioned shins are usually right next to you and are prime >targets of opportunity. :) > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2002
From: Rob Prior <rv7(at)b4.ca>
Subject: Re: RV-7 construction speed
Dana, are you drilling out the pre-punched holes, or just dimpling them and riveting away? -RB4 RV-7 extreme slow build... Empennage has spars & skins drilled, but no holes in the ribs. Grrr. Dana Overall wrote: > > >>>The new tail was completed yesterday after about 10 hours of very easy >>> >>work. >> >>> Only had to drill out one rivet. >>> >>10 hours? For crying out loud! I know I'm not Mr. Speedy, but I think >>I had around 200 hours on my RV-6 tail. I know, it should have been less >>than that, but still.... >> > >Joe the 10 hours max was on the VS alone. My CPA practice is in my home and >I don't start until 9AM. My son gets on the bus at 7:30 so I have about an >hour in the morning to piddle. A little time at lunch and about 1.5 hrs in >the evening. With this sch. I will have the HS done this weekend and start >on the control surfaces. I am truly not rushing it. I have the HS skeleton >clecoed together now. I'll take it apart this evening and start deburring. >I'll cleco it back together probably Friday and rivet over the weekend. >Everything, and I mean everything (that is except for the HS405 & 406) is >predrilled perfectly. I spend most of my time deburring, that is the truth. > They just started shipping the totally pre punched emps in January. I'm >figuring less than 50 hours to do the entire emp., and that is with a lot of >head scratching. > >I've been a little leary of posting this:-), for fear of retaliation but >what the heck:-). > >Three weeks, part time work and you will have the new "slow build" emp. >together. > >You can see the 10 hours of work at the bottom of the emp. page listed >below. You can also see a shot of the pre drilled ribs. > >Ordered my wings today!! I'm sure it will slow down here pretty soon. Life >in the slow lane!! > >Dana Overall >Richmond, KY >7 emp. >http://63.69.213.180/newtech/danas_airplane_factory/project.html > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2002
From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: Finish kit fairings
racker(at)rmci.net wrote: > > > I dread that stuff too. Got the emp fairing from fairings-etc, gear leg > fairings from Team Rocket (not mounted yet). Both are of great quality, > and both companies first rate to deal with. > > Sam Buchanan's website has a review on the Team Rocket stuff. > > Rob Acker (RV-6). > http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal/fairings.htm Sam Buchanan ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Bobpaulo(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 19, 2002
Subject: Chery Max question
Will a typical hand pop rivet puller be effective in setting the smaller cherrymax rivets? Thanks, Bob ________________________________________________________________________________
From: KBoatri144(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 19, 2002
Subject: Re: Chery Max question
In a message dated 3/19/02 7:59:27 PM Eastern Standard Time, Bobpaulo(at)aol.com writes: << Will a typical hand pop rivet puller be effective in setting the smaller cherrymax rivets? Thanks, Bob >> Yes. The pull is harder than on the simple pop rivets used in most places, but my Wal-mart rivet puller works just fine on 'em. Kyle Boatright 0-320/Aymar Demuth RV-6 Slider Kennesaw, GA http://www.angelfire.com/my/rv6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dana Overall" <bo124rs(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: RV-7 construction speed
Date: Mar 19, 2002
>From: Rob Prior <rv7(at)b4.ca> >Dana, are you drilling out the pre-punched holes, or just dimpling them >and riveting away? > You mean I'm supposed to drill these holes again???????? Only kidding, yes I'm drilling however, with all the ribs pre-punched and matching up, it is very easy and quick. Just pay attention to the scheme of drilling, outboard in or inboard out. This evening I had to clamp on the HS405 inboard rib and drill that one (it came off the 8). It is the only rib in the emp. not pre-punched. What a drag that one rib was:-) (ducking into my foxhole after that comment:-). Dana Overall Richmond, KY 7 emp. http://63.69.213.180/newtech/danas_airplane_factory/project.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ned Bowers" <nedbowers(at)peoplepc.com>
Subject: Chery Max question
Date: Mar 19, 2002
Dear Bob: Skybolt has used and sold CherryMax for 20 years. We have sold a puller made by Cherry for quite some time, although, I am under the impression that even it may disappear. The best tool I have in my tool box for the 1/8 or even 5/32 dia CherryMax is a good Craftsman puller. Even a cheap one will pull the 1/8 OK for a short while. I beleive you will have good results with the standard blind rivet Craftsman tool. By the way, the CherryMax is a great product and it is structural, all of the Q rivets and POP rivets are not. The Q rivets claim structural, but you won't find them in any production airplane. The other problem with them is that the stem breaks well above the head, meaning you must clip or grind them flush. Not fun. The CherryMax breaks very clean. Just be sure that you respect the grip range. Now the disadvantage. Be sure you are riveting for good. Trying to drill out a CherryMax is very difficult. Happy Riveting! Ned Bowers, President, Skybolt Fasteners -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Bobpaulo(at)aol.com Subject: RV-List: Chery Max question Will a typical hand pop rivet puller be effective in setting the smaller cherrymax rivets? Thanks, Bob ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Jewell" <jjewell(at)telus.net>
Subject: Re: Chery Max question
Date: Mar 19, 2002
Hello Ned, Actually drilling out a CherryMax rivet is quite easy. The trick is to use a small diameter pin punch and drive the steel center pin out before trying to drill the rivet. If you intend to use Cherrymax rivets be sure to use the correct number drill to prepare the holes. For instance the CherryMax rivets that I used recently called for a #26 drill. Ask the people that supply the CherryMax rivets to you to advise as to the drill size, minimum and maximum grip lengths etc. Jim in Kelowna ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ned Bowers" <nedbowers(at)peoplepc.com> Subject: RE: RV-List: Chery Max question > > Dear Bob: > > Skybolt has used and sold CherryMax for 20 years. We have sold a puller > made by Cherry for quite some time, although, I am under the impression that > even it may disappear. > > The best tool I have in my tool box for the 1/8 or even 5/32 dia CherryMax > is a good Craftsman puller. Even a cheap one will pull the 1/8 OK for a > short while. I beleive you will have good results with the standard blind > rivet Craftsman tool. > > By the way, the CherryMax is a great product and it is structural, all of > the Q rivets and POP rivets are not. The Q rivets claim structural, but you > won't find them in any production airplane. The other problem with them is > that the stem breaks well above the head, meaning you must clip or grind > them flush. Not fun. The CherryMax breaks very clean. Just be sure that > you respect the grip range. Now the disadvantage. Be sure you are riveting > for good. Trying to drill out a CherryMax is very difficult. > > Happy Riveting! > > Ned Bowers, President, Skybolt Fasteners > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Bobpaulo(at)aol.com > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV-List: Chery Max question > > > Will a typical hand pop rivet puller be effective in setting the smaller > cherrymax rivets? > Thanks, Bob > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2002
From: Jerry Springer <jsflyrv(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Auto Oils
Listers, Doug Rozendaal used to be a regular on this list and heard I was talking about him. :) He asked me to post the following on the RV-LIST. As Doug is president of PetroBlend Corp. a lube oil manufacturer I would really heed what he has to say on the subject. -------------------------Begin post---------------------------- DO NOT use auto oil in your lycosaurus. It contains metalic detergents and antiwear additives which will clog up your valve stems, grind up your valve seats, and generally raise hell in your engine. These engine see very high temps in the valve train and the additives come apart at those temps and make nasty deposits and chemical reactions get started that form acids and all sorts of bad things. There were some guys working with flooded rocker boxes on lycomings. I never heard how far they got, my guess is they had high consumption and very greasy engines. IF (note Big IF) we could lower the temps in an engine to some safe levels, we could add antiwear technology and increase engine life dramatically, but I don't see lycoming doing it. Tailwinds, Doug Rozendaal the pink panther & President, PetroBlend Corp. ( lube oil manufacturer) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: 1/8 Inch Copper Priming Line Source
Date: Mar 19, 2002
Hi Mike, Did you get some copper line? If not, give me an address and I will mail you a foot. Jerry Calvert ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Thompson" <grobdriver(at)yahoo.com> Subject: RV-List: 1/8 Inch Copper Priming Line Source > > Hi Folks, > > I don't remember how I went about estimating how much of the 1/8-inch > copper tubing I would need to plumb the primer, but I have come up 6 > inches short. > > I have not found any in that size at the usual places (Home Depot, > Lowes, Hobby store) and am wondering if anyone has found an unexpected > local-to-a-fair-sized-city source of this stuff. I've padded the > subject line for the future because it appears from an archive search > that others are more clever then me and haven't run into this problem. > > Haven't been to a small-motor shop (read lawn-mower repair) but don't > even know if those type machines even use it. > > Hate to order a foot and pay their shipping and worst of all, have to > wait! > > At this end of the project things get impatient, as some of you know. > > Thanks! > > Mike Thompson > Austin, TX > -6 N140RV (Reserved) > Firewall Forward > > > http://sports.yahoo.com/ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2002
From: gert <gert(at)execpc.com>
Subject: Re: Pneumatic squeezer overhaul?
Try "the Yard" they helped me with mine, I believe Avery has done it in the past too ernie billing wrote: > > > I found a Chicago Pneumatic CP214 (just like Avery's) > squeezer on EBay for $150. Its almost in working > order but I think it needs a re-seal. Barely squeezes > a -3 rivet at 100PSI. Anyone around sell kits for > this or can anyone recommend someone to send it to? > > Ernie Billing > ebilling(at)yahoo.com > RV7 - Still on HS > San Luis Obispo, CA > > http://sports.yahoo.com/ > -- is subject to a download and archival fee in the amount of $500 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2002
From: Jeff Bertsch <mach25(at)swbell.net>
Subject: Engine angle
Hello RV List I have been reading the list for a few weeks and finally have my first question for you experts! I recently bought an almost new RV-4 -- only 60 hours total time. (Don't hold it against me that I did not build it myself. I've wanted an RV for nearly 14 years and knew that I could never build one myself -- and finally I'm fortunate enough to have found one.) Anyway... I've noticed that the spinner backplate is much closer to the cowling at the top than it is at the bottom. It appears that the engine & prop are canted up just a little bit. Why is this? I've been told it is built that way and as the engine mounts "settle" the engine will drop down straight. True? If so how long does that take? Thanks! Jeff Bertsch mach25(at)swbell.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom Gummo" <t.gummo(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Engine angle
Date: Mar 19, 2002
What part of the world are you located? You might be able to find a local builder to look over the plane. Tom Gummo Apple Valley, CA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Bertsch" <mach25(at)swbell.net> Subject: RV-List: Engine angle > > Hello RV List > I have been reading the list for a few weeks and finally have my first > question for you experts! > I recently bought an almost new RV-4 -- only 60 hours total time. (Don't > hold it against me that I did not build it myself. I've wanted an RV for > nearly 14 years and knew that I could never build one myself -- and finally > I'm fortunate enough to have found one.) Anyway... I've noticed that the > spinner backplate is much closer to the cowling at the top than it is at > the bottom. It appears that the engine & prop are canted up just a little > bit. Why is this? I've been told it is built that way and as the engine > mounts "settle" the engine will drop down straight. True? If so how long > does that take? > Thanks! > Jeff Bertsch > mach25(at)swbell.net > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2002
From: Dan Masys <dmasys(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: anyone has more info?
>N-number : N491T >Aircraft Serial Number : 891 >Aircraft Manufacturer : TRENTI MARIO FRANK > Model : RV-4 >Engine Manufacturer : LYCOMING > Model : 0-320 SERIES >Aircraft Year : 1991 >Owner Name : TRENTI MARIO F >Owner Address : PO BOX 546 / JACUMBA, CA, 91934-0546 >Registration Date : 30-Oct-1990 >Airworthiness Certificate Type : Experimental >Approved Operations : Amateur Built > > >I have no info on the cause of the accident. >K. The San Diego papers noted 2 fatalities and opined that the winds, which were howling at up to 50kts in the mountains where the Jacumba airport is located and where the accident occurred on landing, played a role in the accident. With strong gusting crosswinds at that location, it wouldn't be hard to imagine getting blown off the side of the runway or groundlooping, and flipping over. The flight had departed Gillespie field in El Cajon, CA 20 minutes earlier. -Dan Masys -7A fuse, San Diego ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rob W M Shipley" <Rob(at)RobsGlass.com>
Subject: A loss.
Date: Mar 19, 2002
According to a local paper, (Union Tribune), we lost one of our own last Friday, March 15th. An RV4 out of Gillespie Field (SEE) hit the ground and overturned catching fire alongside the small rural strip at Jacumba - about 50 miles East of San Diego. The name(s) of pilot and owner weren't given and no cause other than a reference to winds of 20 to 25 mph at the time. This is a SMALL strip, from memory no more than 25' wide, and a crosswind landing in the gusty winds which are very common in the high desert would be challenging. If anyone has more news perhaps they would post it and let us all know. My sympathies and best wishes to all the pilot's friends and family. Rob Rob W M Shipley RV9a Fuse ordered. N919RV resvd. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2002
From: Jeff Bertsch <mach25(at)swbell.net>
Subject: Re: Engine angle
Tom, I'm in the Houston, TX area. Ellington Field actually, south of Houston.. Jeff Bertsch mach25(at)swbell.net houston, tx ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randall Henderson" <randallh(at)attbi.com>
Subject: Re: Crotch Strap Mount
Date: Mar 19, 2002
That other link someone posted is an old one -- the updated page that shows my crotch strap mount is at http://www.edt.com/homewing/rhproject/interior.html I should get rid of that old one -- the main difference in the newer one was the merging with the rest of the interior stuff, plus some updated text that makes note of Van's crotch strap mounts. Frankly my deal was way over-engineered, so I'm not necessarily recommending it. But I'm leaving it up so people can see what I did anyway. Randall Henderson, RV-6 N6R (~300 hrs) Portland, OR www.vanshomewing.org ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stephen J. Soule" <SSoule(at)pfclaw.com>
Subject: Engine angle
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Jeff, My engine sagged into alignment at about 50 hours. Aerobatic flight seemed to do the trick. Steve Soule Huntington, Vermont RV-6A N227RV -----Original Message----- I have been reading the list for a few weeks and finally have my first question for you experts! I recently bought an almost new RV-4 -- only 60 hours total time. (Don't hold it against me that I did not build it myself. I've wanted an RV for nearly 14 years and knew that I could never build one myself -- and finally I'm fortunate enough to have found one.) Anyway... I've noticed that the spinner backplate is much closer to the cowling at the top than it is at the bottom. It appears that the engine & prop are canted up just a little bit. Why is this? I've been told it is built that way and as the engine mounts "settle" the engine will drop down straight. True? If so how long does that take? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 14, 2002
Subject: FW: Hartzell Propeller For Sale (Correction)....
From: czechsix(at)juno.com
I corresponded a bit with Chuck Graves, the guy selling this prop. He removed it from his Glasair I to install a Whirlwind prop instead. The Hartzell has about 200 hours since overhaul completed in '98. But it has an old hub...not only is it not a -B hub, but it's not even an -A hub. The recent AD requires immediate hub replacement if you do any acro at all, and if you don't do acro you're supposed to get an eddy current inspection of the hub every 150 hours (!) and replace the hub at next overhaul. I talked to Hartzell and American Propeller (who overhauled this prop in '98) and they both told me not to even consider it at this price because I'd end up paying as much or more than a new one from Vans by the time I got the hub replaced. The only way I can see it making sense for any RV driver is if you don't care about following the SB/AD (since you are Experimental and not required to comply with the AD). In that case you could save $1500 off a new Hartzell from Vans and fly it at your own risk. I wouldn't do it though... BTW, a couple other comments....first of all I think Chuck Graves seems like a great guy and isn't trying to rip somebody off (for the right buyer who's willing to do the eddy current inspections, doesn't do acro and doesn't have access to Van's OEM prices, $3500 is probly a fair asking price considering these props are over $9K outright from Hartzell). Also for those of you who have an -A hub (which you probly have if you bought Hartzell's back before April of '97 when the new -B hubs came out), Hartzell is running a free hub replacement right now if you meet certain criteria...not sure what they all are but one thing is it must be completed by June 30....there may be some other criteria that makes you ineligible but I'd give Hartzell a call asap if you have an -A hub. --Mark Navratil Cedar Rapids, Iowa RV-8A...still haven't found a deal on a C.S. prop that's better than Van's new OEM prices....so the Sensenich continues to sit on the entertainment center in the living room awaiting installation... : ) From: "Tim Lewis" <timrv6a(at)earthlink.net> Subject: Re: RV-List: FW: Hartzell Propeller For Sale (Correction).... > Hartzell HC-C2YK-1BF > Blades F7666A-2 (74") > 205 hours Since Newly Overhauled July 22, 1998 > Include Spinner (Fits Glasair I but may work for RV's?) > > $3500.00 Does this prop have the new -B hub? If so, it's free from the AD and SB that address hub cracking with aerobatic use. Having just paid $1300 to upgrade mine from -A to -B hub, I'm a tad sensitive to that issue! Tim ****** Tim Lewis -- HEF (Manassas, VA) RV-6A N47TD - First Flight 18 Dec 99 http://www.geocities.com/timrv6a ****** ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Jordan" <jrjordan(at)tcinternet.net>
Subject: new address
Date: Mar 20, 2002
I have a new e-mail address. Please update me in your records. New address: jrjordan(at)mn.rr.com Old address: jrjordan(at)tcinternet.net Thank you. John Jordan 952-937-6233 ----- Original Message ----- From: "RV-List Digest Server" <rv-list-digest(at)matronics.com> Subject: RV-List Digest: 91 Msgs - 03/19/02 > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dana Overall" <bo124rs(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Engine angle
Date: Mar 20, 2002
>From: Jeff Bertsch <mach25(at)swbell.net> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: "'rv-list(at)matronics.com'" >Subject: RV-List: Engine angle >Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 22:03:10 -0600 > > >Hello RV List >I have been reading the list for a few weeks and finally have my first >question for you experts! >I recently bought an almost new RV-4 -- only 60 hours total time. (Don't >hold it against me that I did not build it myself. I've wanted an RV for >nearly 14 years and knew that I could never build one myself -- and finally >I'm fortunate enough to have found one.) Anyway... I've noticed that the >spinner backplate is much closer to the cowling at the top than it is at >the bottom. It appears that the engine & prop are canted up just a little >bit. Why is this? I've been told it is built that way and as the engine >mounts "settle" the engine will drop down straight. True? If so how long >does that take? >Thanks! >Jeff Bertsch >mach25(at)swbell.net > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dana Overall" <bo124rs(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Engine angle
Date: Mar 20, 2002
(Don't >hold it against me that I did not build it myself. I've wanted an RV for >nearly 14 years and knew that I could never build one myself -- and finally >I'm fortunate enough to have found one.) This is not an engine answer, but Jeff and I are on a Bonanza list together and recongnized names betweent he two lists. If we could persuade him to post a few pictures of is airplane (beautiful paint, HSI.........the list goes on), you would be impressed. If not, I have a couple shots and will throw them out there. Dana Overall Richmond, KY 7 emp. http://63.69.213.180/newtech/danas_airplane_factory/project.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: KBoatri144(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Subject: Re: Engine angle
In a message dated 3/19/02 11:03:09 PM Eastern Standard Time, mach25(at)swbell.net writes: << Hello RV List I have been reading the list for a few weeks and finally have my first question for you experts! I recently bought an almost new RV-4 -- only 60 hours total time. (Don't hold it against me that I did not build it myself. I've wanted an RV for nearly 14 years and knew that I could never build one myself -- and finally I'm fortunate enough to have found one.) Anyway... I've noticed that the spinner backplate is much closer to the cowling at the top than it is at the bottom. >> Believe it or not, the spinner backplate to cowling difference is greater at the bottom on many RV's. I don't know if Van makes his molds that way intentionally or not, but it does make the bottom cowl (at least on my RV-6) slightly easier to remove and reattach than if the gap was as small at the bottom as it is at the top. Kyle Boatright 0-320/Aymar Demuth RV-6 Slider Kennesaw, GA http://www.angelfire.com/my/rv6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Donald Mei" <don_mei(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: PAX briefing
Date: Mar 20, 2002
No offense to the sender, but this passage: It would be interesting, and probably not too hard to build some type of break-away function into the rear stick. Perhaps some type of plastic link in the rear stick that would quickly fail in the event that the pilot and passenger got themselves into some kind of arm wrestle at 200 kts. is something we need to try to avoid. Adding hardware and complexity to take the place of common sense. I've heard a lot of good ideas in this thread. Things I hadn't thought of, that I will incorporate into my preflight and inflight briefing. One thing that I hadn't heard , that I do if I am going to let the passenger try a hand at flying the plane is to slow it down to well below maneuvering speed. I don't want to get into a debate about what maneuvering speed REALLY is, but the bottom line is that at 130mph, its pretty darned near impossible to rip the wings off. That way if the pax ham fists it in the worst way we don't die. This is precisely how, it was finally determined, Vans lost their RV-8 demonstrator. One other thought, while they're following me on the stick, I ask them if they've ever ridden a motorcycle. A fair number of them will reply that yes, they have. If yes, then I ask them to remember how, once at speed, you steer the motorcycle more with PRESSURE on the bars, than with MOVEMENT. Most will get it pretty quick. In this way, most non-pilots have an easier time adapting to an RV than those who are used to the huge control movements necessary to fly a Cessna or Piper. Blue Skys Don Mei Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "MacInnes, Bruce" <bmacinnes(at)skipbarber.com>
Subject: FW: Charging system problem...Bad news.
Date: Mar 20, 2002
> -----Original Message----- > From: MacInnes, Bruce > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:03 AM > To: 'rv-list(at)matronics.com' > Subject: Charging system problem...Bad news. > > A curious anominaly has developed in the electrical system of my RV-4. On > cold start-up my volt-meter pegs itself (over 19 volts) and the amp meter > reads 20A. I switch off the alternator, fly for 10 minuets, then turn it > back on and all is ok. I am very careful to not operate any radios or > accessories unless the system is charging properly. My local ignition shop > feels it might be a bad ground somewhere in the system... Any ideas? > > I just read of the fatal RV-4 (N-491T) crash on March 15th in Jacumba, > Ca. Does anyone know the cause of this accident? My sympathy goes out to > the family of the pilot. > > Bruce MacInnes- N-14FT,365 hours ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 20, 2002
From: Bill Marvel <bmarvel(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: FW: Charging system problem...Bad news.
Bruce: Sounds like a classic case of a voltage regulator problem. It is telling your alternator to go to max output and the alternator complies. If you can check the reg separately or replace it with a known good one, that is the place to start. Bill Marvel 8A waiting for DAR inspection > > A curious anominaly has developed in the electrical system of my RV-4. On > > cold start-up my volt-meter pegs itself (over 19 volts) and the amp meter > > reads 20A. I switch off the alternator, fly for 10 minuets, then turn it > > back on and all is ok. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Bundy" <ebundy(at)velocitus.net>
Subject: Re: Pre-Flight Passenger Briefings
Date: Mar 20, 2002
I leave mine unpinned as well. I know the idea probably bothers some people, but think about it - whenever someone is flying from the right seat (unless it's someone I know is capable) my hand is never more than a few inches away from the stick. And if someone is putting enough upward pressure (!) on the stick to pull it out, the flight will most likely smooth out from removing the PIO's. Ed Bundy - RV6A N427EM 450+ hours 160hp 0320 w/Sensenich 70x78 Eagle, ID ebundy(at)velocitus.net > I leave mine unpinned and the PTT switch is on the panel. That way I can take it out at a seconds notice and beat my passenger with it in case they start acting up.....Of course I don't tell them it's removable in case they want to beat me with it after some "adventurous manoeuvre" they didn't appreciate. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Charles Rowbotham" <crowbotham(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: PAX briefing
Date: Mar 20, 2002
All, A couple of items: 1. Our rear seat stick is consideribly shorter than the front stick and we always stay on the stick. 2. We also keep the speed below Va when our guest is flying and remind them to use pressure rather than movements. Safe flying and Good Building, Chuck & Dave Rowbotham RV-8A (Nianitc, CT) MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 20, 2002
From: philip condon <pcondon(at)mitre.org>
Subject: Re: pinholes pinhole fiberglass prep FRP
pinholes pinhole fiberglass prep holes paint prep painting fairings FRP (search keywords) for future e-searching of Matt's archives Filling pinholes in Fiberglass Austin, get some K36 from the local ppg dealer. Reduce it a bit with MEK and just pour it ahead of a squeegee. Just trowl the thing as you go. Then when it drys do an initial sand with about 180 grit and your pinhole problems will be gone. I learned this from a guy who de-pinholed an entire Thunder Mustang in about 8 hours, the conventional way would have taken weeks. Eric ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Bundy" <ebundy(at)velocitus.net>
Subject: Re: Pre-Flight Passenger Briefings
Date: Mar 20, 2002
I know exactly how you feel Tom. Eight years ago when I was building my 6A there where only a few flying RV's in the area. I gently let each of the owners know that I would love to go for a very short ride just to know what I was getting into. Lots of head-nodding, and "sure, one of these days" answers. It became obvious that they weren't interested, and I didn't push it. I also understand completely. A lot of effort, blood, money, and liability goes along with building an airplane and offering someone a ride in it. Then there is the other side. When I was a month or so away from my first flight, I scheduled some time with Mike Seager. I had remembered that Jerry Springer lived near there, and I sent him an Email letting him know that I was going to be in the area for a couple of days and that I'd like to get together and chat if he had the time. I called him after I arrived in Portland and when he found out that I had not been able to get a ride in an RV he was almost outraged. I told him I was getting checked out with Mike the next day and it wasn't a problem, but he wouldn't have any of it and insisted that I meet him at his hangar immediately. After a wonderful ride he then insisted on taking my wife up as well. I will never forget the generosity and "RV spirit" that I got from Jerry that day. Thanks Jerry. Having said that, I'm very cautious about giving rides. When your insurance policy only covers passengers to the tune of $100k, you are flying naked financially. As has been posted on this thread, there are riders that inadvertently, or through stupidity, damage your airplane or risk the safety of the flight. I will always, without question, happily, go out of my way to give a ride to anyone that is building an RV and has never been in one, or needs a motivational ride to get out of a building rut. Anyone in this category generally has the right attitude about flying in general, and flying in an RV in particular. I have a couple of friends that have an "RV mentality" that can go with me anytime I have a spare seat (strangely, most of them are building RV's as well ). I will also give a ride to someone that I know personally, and don't feel is a risk. I will not give rides to people that are just looking for a free airplane ride. That may seem harsh to some, but I've had enough bad experiences to feel it just isn't worth it. So Tom, if you ever get out to Boise, the airplane's warmed up and ready to go. Ed Bundy - RV6A N427EM 450+ hours 160hp 0320 w/Sensenich 70x78 Eagle, ID ebundy(at)velocitus.net > My hats off to any of you guys who actually will give somebody a ride in > your RV. I have come to the conclusion that my 8 will probably be the first > RV I fly in. I have walked around RVs with $100.00 bills hanging out of my > pockets as gas money and I have indeed asked (very courteously ) for a trip > around the pattern so I could actually feel what it was I was building , but > to no avail.I weigh 200 and a slim 200 at that, so the excuses about CG and > over weight seem not to hold water. It's really OK though, everyone has the > right to fly whomever and whenever they choose in their plane, and I do > understand that is only through generousity that I'll get the ride. Hell, I > even flew commercial to Lakeland to the mini fly in hopeing to catch a ride > with no luck. I did however see some great planes and pick a few brains and > walk the beach with the wife, so it was a good trip just the same. I promise > that when I finish, the back seat of my 8 will be available to new builders > who need some inspiration. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Vince Himsl" <vhimsl(at)turbonet.com>
Subject: Rivet question.
Date: Mar 20, 2002
It is mostly a matter of appearance. When in doubt, I put the manufactured head where it will be seen and/or possibly scraped against by the people in and outside the plane. Regards Vince Himsl RV8-canoe Moscow, ID ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Vince Himsl" <vhimsl(at)turbonet.com>
Subject: RE: RV8-List: VS-808PP
Date: Mar 20, 2002
I used the 'fly type' sold by Avery. But use it in a drill press. It does a pretty good job as the center drill bit holds the piece on center. I did the lightening holes in the beginning but later started judging the weight saving (or lack thereof) with the work involved on the smaller pieces and opted not to drill the holes in some cases. Regards, Vince Himsl RV8 - Canoe Moscow, ID USA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MeangreenRV4(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Subject: Re: Engine angle
In a message dated 3/19/2002 8:03:02 PM Pacific Standard Time, mach25(at)swbell.net writes: > Hello RV List > I have been reading the list for a few weeks and finally have my first > question for you experts! > I recently bought an almost new RV-4 -- only 60 hours total time. (Don't > hold it against me that I did not build it myself. I've wanted an RV for > nearly 14 years and knew that I could never build one myself -- and finally > > I'm fortunate enough to have found one.) Anyway... I've noticed that the > > spinner backplate is much closer to the cowling at the top than it is at > the bottom. It appears that the engine & prop are canted up just a little > bit. Why is this? I've been told it is built that way and as the engine > mounts "settle" the engine will drop down straight. True? If so how long > does that take? > Thanks! > The reason you have a larger gap on the bottom of your cowl than on the top is when you go to remove the bottom cowl you need the space to get the cowl off and clear the spinner backplate, where as the top cowl can be lifted straight up. Tim Barnes Meangreen RV-4 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Charles Graves" <cgraves(at)secor.com>
Subject: FW: Hartzell Propeller For Sale (Correction)....
Date: Mar 20, 2002
More info...I just got quotes for Eddy Current inspection ($300.00) and the hub does not have to be replaced at overhaul...that only applies to -A hubs which this is not. Basically, if you're not not going to do acro then it wouldn't make sense to replace the hub unless you plan on keeping the airplane for over 10 years. ($3100.00 for hub replacement). -Chuck -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of czechsix(at)juno.com Subject: RV-List: FW: Hartzell Propeller For Sale (Correction).... I corresponded a bit with Chuck Graves, the guy selling this prop. He removed it from his Glasair I to install a Whirlwind prop instead. The Hartzell has about 200 hours since overhaul completed in '98. But it has an old hub...not only is it not a -B hub, but it's not even an -A hub. The recent AD requires immediate hub replacement if you do any acro at all, and if you don't do acro you're supposed to get an eddy current inspection of the hub every 150 hours (!) and replace the hub at next overhaul. I talked to Hartzell and American Propeller (who overhauled this prop in '98) and they both told me not to even consider it at this price because I'd end up paying as much or more than a new one from Vans by the time I got the hub replaced. The only way I can see it making sense for any RV driver is if you don't care about following the SB/AD (since you are Experimental and not required to comply with the AD). In that case you could save $1500 off a new Hartzell from Vans ! and fly it at your own risk. I wouldn't do it though... BTW, a couple other comments....first of all I think Chuck Graves seems like a great guy and isn't trying to rip somebody off (for the right buyer who's willing to do the eddy current inspections, doesn't do acro and doesn't have access to Van's OEM prices, $3500 is probly a fair asking price considering these props are over $9K outright from Hartzell). Also for those of you who have an -A hub (which you probly have if you bought Hartzell's back before April of '97 when the new -B hubs came out), Hartzell is running a free hub replacement right now if you meet certain criteria...not sure what they all are but one thing is it must be completed by June 30....there may be some other criteria that makes you ineligible but I'd give Hartzell a call asap if you have an -A hub. --Mark Navratil Cedar Rapids, Iowa RV-8A...still haven't found a deal on a C.S. prop that's better than Van's new OEM prices....so the Sensenich continues to sit on the entertainment center in the living room awaiting installation... : ) From: "Tim Lewis" <timrv6a(at)earthlink.net> Subject: Re: RV-List: FW: Hartzell Propeller For Sale (Correction).... > Hartzell HC-C2YK-1BF > Blades F7666A-2 (74") > 205 hours Since Newly Overhauled July 22, 1998 > Include Spinner (Fits Glasair I but may work for RV's?) > > $3500.00 Does this prop have the new -B hub? If so, it's free from the AD and SB that address hub cracking with aerobatic use. Having just paid $1300 to upgrade mine from -A to -B hub, I'm a tad sensitive to that issue! Tim ****** Tim Lewis -- HEF (Manassas, VA) RV-6A N47TD - First Flight 18 Dec 99 http://www.geocities.com/timrv6a ****** ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 20, 2002
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Van's Flap Motor - Need Info...
RV-Listers, Would someone be so kind as to forward me some information on the flap motor Van's uses? As I recall, the manufacture had a web page on the specs for the unit. I need a similar functionality for a different project, but I suspect that the stock unit from Van's won't have enough power. I know that the company makes larger versions with various throws. If anyone happens to have the name of the company and/or the web site address I would be forever grateful. Thanks!! Matt Dralle Matt G Dralle | Matronics | PO Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 925-606-1001 V | 925-606-6281 F | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ WWW | Featuring Products For Aircraft They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ken Harrill <KHarrill(at)osa.state.sc.us>
Subject: More Hartzell Propeller AD Info
Date: Mar 20, 2002
I talked with my prop shop today about my prop that has no "A" or "B" suffix. He stated that this AD does not apply to my prop and that I could make that entry in the log book. He said that RV's are not considered aerobatic in regards to this AD. He had a reference list of aircraft that the AD applied to and RV's were not on the list. It would be good if someone could verify this with another prop shop. Ken Harrill RV-6, almost ready to fly ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rv8don(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Subject: Re: Van's Flap Motor - Need Info...
Matt, My -8 flap motor is from Motion Systems Corporation in Eatontown, NJ. The web site is:http://www.motionsystem.com/ I believe Van is using a different souce now. Regards, -Don Rv8 NJ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bruce Gray" <bruce.gray(at)snet.net>
Subject: Van's Flap Motor - Need Info...
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Motion Systems refuses to sell to any aviation application. Bruce -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Rv8don(at)aol.com Subject: Re: RV-List: Van's Flap Motor - Need Info... Matt, My -8 flap motor is from Motion Systems Corporation in Eatontown, NJ. The web site is:http://www.motionsystem.com/ I believe Van is using a different souce now. Regards, -Don Rv8 NJ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Neil McLeod" <bedrock(at)theriver.com>
Subject: Re: Gascolator pressure Limits
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Why "off air" ? Some of us would like to know if this set up will in fact work. Neil ----- Original Message ----- From: "C. Rabaut" <crabaut(at)coalinga.com> Subject: RV-List: Gascolator pressure Limits > > Hi Guys (& gals), > > I just pressure tested my new plumbing for my IO-320 boost pump from > "Airflow Performance" (cost $508.58 O.T.D.). The pump went to almost 50 PSI > when I first flipped it on and blew out my rubber seal on my gascolator (the > one I bought from Van's). Other folks have told me that Van's gascolator > could/would support the boost pumps up to about 40-50 PSI. Anyone with any > comments, suggestions, humorous remarks... ? Yes, I will probably cough-up > the bucks and buy an AnAir gascolator (anyone got one for sale/re-sale?), if > I have too... But I was tryin' to save up for the Christen inverted oil > system (anyone got one of these for cheap?). I called "Don" at Airflow > Performance and he said their boost pump should normalize at about 30 PSI > and he even commented that Van's gascolator should work okay, "Other guys > have used them...". Okay, I'll take my replies "off-air". Thanks, > > Chuck > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 20, 2002
From: Greg Puckett <rv8er(at)concentric.net>
Subject: RE: Van's Flap Motor - Need Info...
Matt, The website for this is: http://www.motionsystem.com/ Greg Puckett ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Subject: Re: Pinholes
From: Don Jordan <dons6a(at)juno.com>
Ask for some high build primer/filler . I think Dupont is URO, I got a gallon of Europrime from the dupont store that was $65.00 Lay it on & sand it off. Don Jordan - N6DJ - 6A Arlington, Tx ****************************** > > Hi Listers, > I spent 4 hours yesterday shooting primer on all > my > fibreglass parts and was blown away..no pun intended...at the > appearance of > pinholes in the S cowl.... > Until you shoot a prime on it, it is just not visible as to how > porous it > looks. > GAWD, it looks just like screen mesh for a screen door....I know my > primer > ain't going to fill that..have you seen the same ? > What is the best remedy to fill before thinking about top color ? > I did try some superfill and epoxy over part of it but the results > were not > too great and it is very labor intensive for such a big area....what > have > you guys done ?? > Any input appreciated. > Thanks, > Austin > Vancouver. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: Re: Pinholes
Date: Mar 20, 2002
> Austin, get some K36 from the local ppg dealer. Reduce it a bit with MEK > and just pour it ahead of a squeegee. Just trowl the thing as you go. Then > when it drys do an initial sand with about 180 grit and your pinhole > problems will be gone. I learned this from a guy who de-pinholed an entire > Thunder Mustang in about 8 hours, the conventional way would have taken > weeks. K38 replaced K36, works even better. Randy Lervold RV-8 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Greg Young" <gyoung@cs-sol.com>
Subject: Van's Flap Motor - Need Info...
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Not surprising... lots of vendors won't sell to a company in or freshly out of bankruptcy. Greg > > > Motion Systems will no longer sell to Glasair (Stoddard-Hamilton) > > Bruce > Glasair III > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 20, 2002
From: "Owens, Laird" <Owens(at)aerovironment.com>
Subject: Pinholes
I have some Claus Savier wheelpants I'm working on right now. I tried the experment at lunch today using K36 both thinned and unthinned. I found the unthinned mix worked better. Laird RV-6 (speed upgrade work in progress) > Austin, get some K36 from the local ppg dealer. Reduce it a bit with MEK > and just pour it ahead of a squeegee. Just trowl the thing as you go. Then > when it drys do an initial sand with about 180 grit and your pinhole > problems will be gone. I learned this from a guy who de-pinholed an entire > Thunder Mustang in about 8 hours, the conventional way would have taken > weeks. K38 replaced K36, works even better. Randy Lervold RV-8 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rv6238(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Subject: Pinholes
Need to prep my fiberglass. Sounds like you guys are onto a good thing. What is and where do you get K-36/K-38? What is PPG? Thanks, Bill ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rick Jory" <rickjory(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Pinholes
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Both should be available (K36 and K38) . . . however, I think the K38 is about twice the price of K36. Rick Jory RV8A > > K38 replaced K36, works even better. > > Randy Lervold > RV-8 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 20, 2002
From: Mark Antenbring <mantenbring(at)slcl.net>
Subject: need tools
Is anyone willing to part with their tools? If no one has any, which company should I go to buy a new set? A few people say Avery is the one, but it seems that they are much more expensive. Is it worth it? Is it easy to sell the tools once you are done? Thanks, Mark RV7 tail - 0% complete ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rv6238(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Subject: Matt, we have a problem
Matt, Looks like we have a problem child on the list. How can we eliminate it? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stein Bruch" <stein(at)steinair.com>
Subject: List Issues
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Hi Matt, Undoubtedly you've seen the message below. I am familiar with the individual who was banned from the "other" list, and why. It was very justified. I urge you to send him a kind warning not to use your list as a sounding board for personal problems with other people, he needs to take this stuff offline. Additionaly, the profanity used below has no place in this group and is unnaceptable. The high level of professionalism on this list is what makes it great. We simply do not need people who degrade the rest of the members. Keep up the good work! Stein Bruch, RV6, Minneapolis. ------------- -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv7-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv7-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Clifford Dow Subject: Re: RV7-List: Welcome Cliff.... if.... --> RV7-List message posted by: Clifford Dow Don't get smart and bossy with me Jerry or i'll have to slap you silly!!!! not much when it comes to being told what do my friend. I'm a pround member of the Matronics list and on a mission to harrass that list that ban me -ban me for freaking life - what's up with that!!!!! - that little prick son of a bitch dirt bag sum sucking jerk face maget scum sucking ying yang!!!!!!!!! Control Freak!!! cliff dow jr cdowjr(at)yahoo.com PS Oh yah did I call you a control freak!!!!!!!!! yah doug - you!!!!!!!!! --- Jerry2DT(at)aol.com wrote: > --> RV7-List message posted by: Jerry2DT(at)aol.com > > Dear Cliff... > > You should realize that lots of RV builders like > myself are members of more > than one list, so are fully aware of the problems > that got you bounced from > Doug's list. If I remember correctly, you were only > bounced after multiple > warnings, so have only yourself to blame. I think > you have a lot to > contribute to this list and your enthusiasm for RV's > is unquestioned. And as > long as you stay on subject, which is the > furtherance of the enjoyment we all > share with our projects, I have little doubt you > will be welcomed by all. > Let's avoid the subjects that offended many on > Doug's list. Hope you take > this in the constructive spirit it was meant, and > best to you. > > Sincerely, > Jerry Cochran > Wilsonville, OR > RV6a 50% done, 90% to go.... > > In a message dated 3/19/02 11:54:38 PM, > rv7-list-digest(at)matronics.com writes: > > << Im building an RV-7A QB in Maine. I succeeded in > getting myself ban for > life from Doug Reeves Vansaircraft.NET builders chat > group for chatting too > much & off the topic postings. Whatever happened to > freedom of speech? Not > only am I ban for life from posting but I cannot > even read the archives as > non-members are able to do on this matronics site. > >> > > > Contributions of > any other form > > latest messages. > other List members. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 20, 2002
From: "Owens, Laird" <Owens(at)aerovironment.com>
Subject: Positive GA/Custom Built Story
Here's a link to a good, positive story about homebuilders .....whoops...Custom Builders and why we build these things in a local paper here in Southern California. Just happens that the stars of the piece are Paul and Victoria Rosales. (How do they get SO much press? I guess I need to fire my press agent......) Regardless of who's the star is, it's great to see some postive press on GA and Homebuilding. Thought you all might enjoy it. See: http://www.avpress.com/ If you don't see it, click on: http://www.avpress.com/n/indexwe.hts Regards, Laird RV-6 SoCal ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 20, 2002
From: "Owens, Laird" <Owens(at)aerovironment.com>
Subject: Pinholes
And that K36 ain't cheap.... BTW, they're PPG products. Laird From: rv-list(at)matronics.com on Wed, Mar 20, 2002 3:38 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Pinholes Both should be available (K36 and K38) . . . however, I think the K38 is about twice the price of K36. Rick Jory RV8A > > K38 replaced K36, works even better. > > Randy Lervold > RV-8 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tim Lewis" <timrv6a(at)earthlink.net>
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Subject: Re: More Hartzell Propeller AD Info
> > > I talked with my prop shop today about my prop that has no "A" or "B" > suffix. He stated that this AD does not apply to my prop and that I > could make that entry in the log book. He said that RV's are not > considered aerobatic in regards to this AD. He had a reference list > of aircraft that the AD applied to and RV's were not on the list. See the attached from John Popel, Hartzell Product Support: From: Ryan, Kevin Subject: FW: Service bulletin HC-SB-61-227 Guys: Here was my answer to the RV guy. A brilliant piece of work, if I do say so myself. Kevin Mark: You essentially have two issues here. The first is "is a homebuilt aircraft subject to an AD?" The second is "If I determine that my homebuilt aircraft is subject to an AD, am I subject to this one?" I have an opinion on the first issue, and solid info on the second. Lets look at the first issue first - is a homebuilt aircraft subject to an AD? I believe that a homebuilt aircraft using a type certified propeller and engine are subject to airworthiness directives affecting those type certified components. I do not know what the FAA's position is on this subject, but am making an effort to find out. I do know one thing, that even if you are not subject to the law of the land, you are still subject to the laws of physics. In other words, if an propeller is showing a problem on a type certified aircraft, using a type certified engine, and you are operating said engine/propeller on your aircraft, I would think seriously about complying with the AD, whether I was required to by law or not. The second question is a little easier to answer. The AD in question (2001-23-08) affects certain aircraft, such as PA-32's, Britten-Norman's, etc. It also affects any aircraft operated as an agricultural aircraft, or as an aerobatic aircraft. Your RV-8 is not a PA-32, or an Islander, and I am certain it is not being used for agricultural purposes, so the only way this AD would apply to you is if it is aerobatic. The FAA defines what and what is not an aerobatic aircraft as follows (this is right from the FAR's): Sec. 23.3 Airplane categories. (a) The normal category is limited to airplanes that have a seating configuration, excluding pilot seats, of nine or less, a maximum certificated takeoff of 12,500 pounds or less, and intended for nonacrobatic operation. Nonacrobatic operation includes: (1) Any maneuver incident to normal flying; (2) Stalls (except whip stalls); and (3) Lazy eights, chandelles, and steep turns, in which the angle of bank is not more than 60 degrees. (b) The utility category is limited to airplanes that have a seating configuration, excluding pilot seats, of nine or less, a maximum certificated takeoff weight of 12,500 pounds or less, and intended for limited acrobatic operation. Airplanes certificated in the utility category may be used in any of the operations covered under paragraph (a) of this section and in limited acrobatic operations. Limited acrobatic operation includes: (1) Spins (if approved for the particular type of airplane); and (2) Lazy eights, chandelles, and steep turns, or similar maneuvers, in which the angle of bank is more than 60 degrees but not more than 90 degrees. (c) The acrobatic category is limited to airplanes that have a seating configuration, excluding pilot seats, of nine or less, a maximum certificated takeoff weight of 12,500 pounds or less, and intended for use without restrictions, other than those shown to be necessary as a result of required flight tests. In other words, if you are performing any maneuvers other than normal flying; stalls (not including whip stalls); Lazy eights; chandelles; steep turns or similar maneuvers, in which the angle of bank is not more than 90 degrees; and spins, you are operating an aerobatic aircraft. If you don't perform these maneuvers, you are not operating an aerobatic aircraft. If you are performing aerobatic maneuvers (as defined), you are operating an aerobatic aircraft. If you are not operating aerobatic aircraft, you are not affected by the AD. If you are, I would suggest you look into the regs, or talk to the EAA and/or FAA about your requirements to conform with AD's. I hope this answers your questions. If it doesn't (or raises even more questions), write me back. Kevin M. Ryan Hartzell Product Support. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Steffensen [mailto:steffco1(at)home.com] Subject: Service bulletin HC-SB-61-227 Sir, I have a Hartzell model HC-C2YK-1B in my Van's RV8A. The engine & propeller came from a 67 Mooney E. Engine is a IO-360A1A the serial number for the propeller is CH358. In reviewing the Service Bulletin, I do not believe that my propeller is effected by this AD. Can you please confirm this. I have 200 hours on the propeller since a overhaul. Please advise. Thanks....Mark Mark Steffensen 520 Saginaw Ct. Allen, TX 75013 972 359-0423 ****** Tim Lewis -- HEF (Manassas, VA) RV-6A N47TD - First Flight 18 Dec 99 http://www.geocities.com/timrv6a ****** ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ABAYMAN(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Subject: Re: need tools
mark if you tell bob avery you are on this list and ask for your 10% off, his prices suddenly become the best out of all. i did a very good comparison on Excell spreadsheet a few years ago when i was gearing up to buy my tools. at 1st glance Averys were more expensive, but since i got the 10 % off, it brought his prices better or the same as everyone else. not knowing how the other tool vendors operate, but i have never had a problem with their deliveries, service, etc.... by the way ,Bob helps Vans out at the fly ins. i know this 1st hand as for at sun n fun a few years ago when Bill & Jeremy, didn't make it to the show, Bob Avery, his crew, George & Becky Orndolf, and a few of us local builders jumped in to help set up their tent and displays. i support those who support our community. hope this helps scott tampa he even gave me a discount on replacing all my tools when he found out they got stolen. he earned my buisness ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 20, 2002
From: Jim Duckett <perfeng(at)3rivers.net>
Subject: Need tools
Mark, I don't know where your looking for tools but, for just about everything I've needed Bob Avery has had it and at generally a better price than say U.S. Industrial or Cleveland and others. It's like the old saying, "you get what you pay for". Don't skimp on the tools man... you'll end up fighting the task and hating your project in the end. You do need to do a little shopping though. As an example, I 've seen cleco's go for as much as $6.00 each and as low as .35 to .40 each (Avery) The shop pretty much uses Snap-On for just about everything other than specialized aircraft. You want expensive, compare a Snap-On pneumatic squeezer at almost 3 grand to Avery's 214 knock off at $500.00. Cost is not always the driving force. Avery's squeezer is all that the Snap-On one is except it's not all polished and chromed. I'm not trying to do a commercial for Avery but, Bob and his folks have really done a great job of putting together "Builder kits" with the minimum tools need to work on a specific project. Sure, you may get some of the consumables cheaper locally but when it comes down to the actual tools, IMHO, I think their hard to beat. Just don't go looking for the cheapest. Go for the best bang for the buck. seeing 426AD3-XX in my sleep now... Jim Duckett, N708JD RV-7a ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Hurlbut" <hurlbut_steve(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Engine choice gone
Date: Mar 20, 2002
We'll today was the most frusterating day in my RV building career. After searching for an engine for over 1 year I found the one of my dreams. The AEIO-360 B4A with 81 hrs SMOH. Unfortunately the owner just sold it from under my nose after agreeing that it was mine. Its amazing what money will do to people (hes not a RV guy). Next week I'll talk to a lawyer and sue for reinbursement of phone calls and research time. In the meantime back to the fuselage with my chin up. Anybody have an engine? Just kidding! Steve RV-7A MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CW9371(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Subject: Re: need tools
In a message dated 3/20/2002 5:24:02 PM Central Standard Time, mantenbring(at)slcl.net writes: > > Is anyone willing to part with their tools? If no one has any, which > company > should I go to buy a new set? A few people say Avery is the one, but it > seems that they are much more expensive. Is it worth it? Is it easy to sell > the tools once you are done? > Thanks, > Mark > bestquality tools brown avery and cleaveland. Brown is cheapest avery most expensive. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: Re: Engine angle
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Jeff, sounds like you're really describing "thrust angle", and it is important to how your plane flies. The good news is that it is fairly easy to check. I did a fair amount of research on this while building my RV-8. You can see what I learned on my web site at... http://www.rv-8.com/Engine.htm Blue skies, Randy Lervold RV-8, #80500, 152 hrs. > Hello RV List > I have been reading the list for a few weeks and finally have my first > question for you experts! > I recently bought an almost new RV-4 -- only 60 hours total time. (Don't > hold it against me that I did not build it myself. I've wanted an RV for > nearly 14 years and knew that I could never build one myself -- and finally > I'm fortunate enough to have found one.) Anyway... I've noticed that the > spinner backplate is much closer to the cowling at the top than it is at > the bottom. It appears that the engine & prop are canted up just a little > bit. Why is this? I've been told it is built that way and as the engine > mounts "settle" the engine will drop down straight. True? If so how long > does that take? > Thanks! > Jeff Bertsch > mach25(at)swbell.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Edward Cole" <edwardmcole(at)attbi.com>
Subject: VM1000 For Sale
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Listers, I have a Vision Microsystems VM1000 for sale with the optional temperature OAT/CAT gauge. CAT can be carb. temp or if you have fuel injection you can use it for cabin air temperature. The unit has less than 10 hrs on it and has been checked out by the factory and a new 15 yr. battery installed within the past 2 weeks. This is a complete system with all sensors and thermocouples included. The current prices at ACS are $3145 for the VM1000 unit and $285 for the optional temp. monitor for at total of $3430. I understand there is quite a lead time from the factory on these units. I will sell for $2700 and include free overnight shipping. If you are interested, please contact me personally at edwardmcole(at)attbi.com Ed Cole RV6A N2169D Flying RV6A N648RV Finishing ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DFCPAC(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Subject: propeller
does anyone know anything about ed sturber propellers? it was off an rv6 with an o-320. pitch is 70x72. would this be good for an rv4 with an 0-320 lyc. thanks dan carley ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 20, 2002
From: "Tim Bryan" <tim(at)bryantechnology.com>
Subject: Re: Pre built fuel tanks.
Mark, Would that also be true with a pre punched kit? Seems like maybe it would be inherently fixed. Tim Bryan RV-6 Slider Finishing forever and ever. This summer I keep telling myself N616TB -------Original Message------- Dana, I had Evan do my tanks and although I haven't flown or put gasoline in them yet, the workmanship appears to be quite good. Having said this, if I had to do it all again, I'd build the tanks myself. Why? Because they will fit your wing spar and skins perfectly. Evan, and anyone else in the tank building business, uses a standard jig to build the tanks and that jig will not be the same as your wing. Yes, it's messy (so I hear!) and takes more time, but I think you'll end up with the best fit possible that way. Mark ----- Original Message ----- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Konrad Werner" <Connywerner(at)wans.net>
Subject: Re: need tools
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Dear Scott, Thanks for sharing your great experience with Avery Tools. It's very valuable to many of us who are shopping for fair tool prices. Thanks again, Konrad ----- Original Message ----- From: <ABAYMAN(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: need tools > > mark > if you tell bob avery you are on this list and ask for your 10% off, his > prices suddenly become the best out of all. i did a very good comparison on > Excell spreadsheet a few years ago when i was gearing up to buy my tools. at > 1st glance Averys were more expensive, but since i got the 10 % off, it > brought his prices better or the same as everyone else. not knowing how the > other tool vendors operate, but i have never had a problem with their > deliveries, service, etc.... by the way ,Bob helps Vans out at the fly ins. i > know this 1st hand as for at sun n fun a few years ago when Bill & Jeremy, > didn't make it to the show, Bob Avery, his crew, George & Becky Orndolf, and > a few of us local builders jumped in to help set up their tent and displays. > i support those who support our community. > hope this helps > scott > tampa > he even gave me a discount on replacing all my tools when he found out they > got stolen. he earned my buisness > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HCRV6(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Subject: Re: Under-seat Navaid Install for 6/7/9
In a message dated 3/19/02 11:57:32 AM Pacific Standard Time, ripsteel(at)edge.net writes: << Does anyone have photos of the "between the ribs" underseat Navaid installation discussed here a few months ago? >> I called Navaid about a year ago and they sent me photos of an under seat install on an RV-6 and instructions provided to them by several builders. I used these to design my own installation to suit. Harry Crosby Pleasanton, California RV-6, finish kit stuff ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 20, 2002
From: Jim Duckett <perfeng(at)3rivers.net>
Subject: Pinholes
Austin, Like a few others have recommended, use a production primer (like DuPont Chroma-Prime) and glaze the area with a polyester glaze. we use a product called "Icing" made by USC. It mixes like filler but, is very thin-bodied. Block sand the area back down below the final primer base, lightly re-prime and final sand for your finish. Due to the texture and finish of most fiberglas/ gel coats, we "Ice" everything in the manner I described. Just priming over will "bridge" instead of fill the pinholes and eventually will cause blemishes in the finish because of captured moisture in the pinholes. As with all work but especially with glas, be sure to use a good cleaner between tasks. Like DuPont Final Kleen or similar. For God's sake, don't use Coleman fuel or something like I've seen on here before. If your still in dought, ask your local PBE supplier for some recommendations. Jim Duckett, N708JD Performance Engineering ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HCRV6(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Subject: Re: Chery Max question
In a message dated 3/19/02 4:59:21 PM Pacific Standard Time, Bobpaulo(at)aol.com writes: << Will a typical hand pop rivet puller be effective in setting the smaller cherrymax rivets? >> My hand puller has worked fine for up to and including 5/32 CherryMax. Harry Crosby Pleasanton, California RV-6, finish kit stuff ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Konrad Werner" <Connywerner(at)wans.net>
Subject: Re: Engine choice gone
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Steve, Could you wait a little before hiring your lawyer (or "Attorney", that's how fancy lawyers want to be addressed)? Let me sign up for Law School early tomorrow morning to help you. Honestly, I mean it! I do offer to represent you, but not on a contingency, but rather $/hr spent, once done with law school!! That will become some of the best and easiest money I ever made. But we all know you were just joking about hiring a willing lawyer! Oh well, farewell my imaginary easy-cash. Too bad it didn't work out, but let go, as the other guy does not stand to his word (or probably any other commitment he makes for this matter). Sorry for your lost opportunity though. I know it hurts, it just hurts. Konrad ABQ-NM ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Hurlbut" <hurlbut_steve(at)hotmail.com> Subject: RV-List: Engine choice gone > > We'll today was the most frusterating day in my RV building career. After > searching for an engine for over 1 year I found the one of my dreams. The > AEIO-360 B4A with 81 hrs SMOH. Unfortunately the owner just sold it from > under my nose after agreeing that it was mine. Its amazing what money will > do to people (hes not a RV guy). Next week I'll talk to a lawyer and sue for > reinbursement of phone calls and research time. > > In the meantime back to the fuselage with my chin up. > > Anybody have an engine? Just kidding! > Steve > RV-7A > > > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 20, 2002
From: rob ray <smokyray(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: RV4-List: propeller
Hi Dan; I had an Ed Sterba 68X72 prop on my RV4 for 4 years. I have a 150HP 0-320 Rose IGN and I climbed at 1200 fpm at 2350/2000 msl, cruised at 150 knots at 2575 and max speed of 170 knots at 3k/2800 rpm. It was easy to repair, handled rain well within Ed's 2200 rpm retsriction and gave me 500 hours of good service in everything from FL grass to ID gravel for a price of $450. Excellent service. I now run a Craig Catto composite. Rob Ray N557RR --- DFCPAC(at)aol.com wrote: > --> RV4-List message posted by: DFCPAC(at)aol.com > > does anyone know anything about ed sturber > propellers? it was off an rv6 with > an o-320. pitch is 70x72. would this be good for an > rv4 with an 0-320 lyc. > > thanks > dan carley > > > > Contributions of > any other form > > latest messages. > other List members. > > http://www.matronics.com/subscription > http://www.matronics.com/photoshare > http://www.matronics.com/search > http://www.matronics.com/archives > http://www.matronics.com/emaillists > > > > > http://movies.yahoo.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Terry Benzer" <TerryBenzer(at)prodigy.net>
Subject: Fuel Tank Dimple Dies
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Is it helpful to use the fuel tank dimple dies when building the fuel tanks? Pros,Cons? Thanks ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark D. Dickens" <mddickens(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Pre built fuel tanks.
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Since I don't have a matched hole kit, I can't say for sure, but I'd think it would reduce the variation tremendously. Still, I'd think there'd be some difference from one builder to another...JMHO. Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Bryan" <tim(at)bryantechnology.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: Pre built fuel tanks. > > Mark, Would that also be true with a pre punched kit? Seems like maybe it > would be inherently fixed. > > Tim Bryan > RV-6 Slider > Finishing forever and ever. This summer I keep telling myself > N616TB > > > -------Original Message------- > > > Dana, I had Evan do my tanks and although I haven't flown or put gasoline in > them yet, the workmanship appears to be quite good. Having said this, if I > had to do it all again, I'd build the tanks myself. Why? Because they will > fit your wing spar and skins perfectly. Evan, and anyone else in the tank > building business, uses a standard jig to build the tanks and that jig will > not be the same as your wing. Yes, it's messy (so I hear!) and takes more > time, but I think you'll end up with the best fit possible that way. > > Mark > ----- Original Message ----- > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 20, 2002
From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel Tank Dimple Dies
Terry Benzer wrote: > > > Is it helpful to use the fuel tank dimple dies when building the fuel tanks? > Pros,Cons? Thanks Yes. All pros, no cons. http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal/tankdies.html Sam Buchanan "The RV Journal" http://thervjournal.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Bobpaulo(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Subject: Re: Fuel Tank Dimple Dies
Although I did use the tank dies, I did not make a comparison. I can now see they are advantageous due to the proseal. I have found from experienced 2X builders that they STRONGLY advise on using the tank dies. Hey, what the heck, what's $30 bucks when you going to end up spending THOUSANDS? Bob in Arkansas finishing wings. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HalBenjamin(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Subject: Re: Fuel Tank Dimple Dies
In a message dated 03/20/2002 9:39:43 PM Eastern Standard Time, TerryBenzer(at)prodigy.net writes: > Is it helpful to use the fuel tank dimple dies when building the fuel tanks? > Pros,Cons? Thanks Terry, I used the set from Cleaveland. They worked well for me. Hal Benjamin RV-4 Scrounging up $ Long Island, NY ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 20, 2002
From: Steven Eberhart <newtech(at)newtech.com>
Subject: Re: Fuel Tank Dimple Dies
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Terry Benzer wrote: > > Is it helpful to use the fuel tank dimple dies when building the fuel tanks? > Pros,Cons? Thanks > I will let you know next week. I bought the dies. I am installing the capacitive fuel sensors right now. Taking a week off next week then it is on to dimpling using the tank dimple dies and then the dreaded proseal. Steve Eberhart RV-7A - just a whole bunch of aluminum, in various states of attachment, filling up my half of the garage. Some of it looks like it might belong on the back end of an airplane. The rest looks like it might, some day, help hold it up in the air.... but what do I know. N14SE reserved ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Konrad Werner" <Connywerner(at)wans.net>
Subject: Re: Slippery stuff
Date: Mar 20, 2002
Dear Dave, Please take no offense to my naive questions earlier, but they are still somewhat unanswered. So does this fisherman's friend: A: "Get financially compensated" for his services to be a fishspotter, at which time, to the best of my limited (non fish!) knowledge, he does in fact need to have a commercial license, and his aircraft may need some Part "xxx" certification? B: In your original post below, you state that this one of my "friends flies a (certificated Cessna) 172" in his endeavors to look for the big fish? Don't get me wrong, I don't care what this person put's in his engine on whatever mission s/he flies! I don't care, if s/he flies for cash without the appropriate ticket. However, I DO CARE about giving people the wrong idea on what could, or better yet, what should not be done to the typical airplane engine without knowing ALL the fact's available to make an educated decision on their well being? Now that I hopefully clearly explained my reasons, I ask you this question: "Is this fish-spotting pilot" your actual friend (like quoted in the first post), or rather just some second hand story from someone else you just heard somewhere (as stated in the second post). The truth may save someone a few bucks on an oil change OR save lives in a preventable enginefailure to a non-mechanically inclined pilot! YOUR CALL! BTW: Did you read Doug Rozendaal's response? If not, let me know, and I'll dig it back up and mail it to you! Like I said, no offense to you, and please, prove me wrong with verifiable facts? Sincerely, Konrad Werner / ABQ-NM BTW: What was or is the benefit of running Castrol 20W50 vs. Aeroshell etc.? It can't be the small difference in the amount of money? So what is ?? * * > > Konrad, you're assuming quite a bit about fish spotting operations here. > This is second hand info (from a local fish spotter) but I'm told that they do > NOT have to be commercial rated or fly certified aircraft for fish spotting > operations. In fact, he's building his own airplane specifically for fish > spotting and yes, he has checked with the Feds. Of course if he IS flying a > certified plane than he'd have to follow the rules... > > Dave * * > > > > > To counter someone's remarks: One of my friends flies a 172 off the VA > > coast doing fish spotting and has used Castrol 20W50 and auto gas in his > > 3000 HOUR 0-320 with no ill effects, burning 1 qt per 7 hours. In fact, he > > has worn out 5 engines in 24,000 hours of fish spotting so I think he might > > have a clue. I'm sure alot of the problems would be related to FAA/PMA and > > other Fed bureaucracy. It's nice to ask why rather than blindly following > > OLD TRENDS.... > > > > My two cents worth: > > A commercial pilot I assume, flying in a stringent Part 135 operation, with > > a certificated Airframe (Cessna 172) and the mighty fine Castrol 20W50 > > AUTO-OIL? And he does care about having an Auto-Gas STC for his > > (commercially used) Airframe/Engine Combo, right? > > By saying he flew 3000 hrs. with the engine, does that mean that this fellow > > flew it for 3000 hrs. without the mandatory overhaul (again, P.135?) at 2000 > > hrs.? > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Sears" <sears(at)searnet.com>
Subject: Re: Pre built fuel tanks.
Date: Mar 21, 2002
> Did you guys hear that, Jim Sears called me a $% @#$%. I just may > have to hop in the Bonanza, fly to the next airport west and...............go > have lunch with Jim and talk RV's:-) (don't worry gang, I hate to admit it > but I know Jim). That's funny. They'll have no idea what you're talking about. I don't put everything on the list, like some people seem to do these days. I sent my note directly to you. :-) The list is growing way too fast with junk talk. Could be done off line and keep down our messages. That's why mine went directly to you. I was kidding with you and saw that it didn't need to be on the list. I'm getting over 100 per day just from the list. That's about double what I used to get. I'm going to wear out the delete key. :-) Jim ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 21, 2002
From: Kevin Horton <khorton(at)cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: More Hartzell Propeller AD Info
> > >I talked with my prop shop today about my prop that has no "A" or "B" >suffix. He stated that this AD does not apply to my prop and that I could >make that entry in the log book. He said that RV's are not considered >aerobatic in regards to this AD. He had a reference list of aircraft >that the AD applied to and RV's were not on the list. > RVs won't be on the list of aircraft in the AD because RVs are not type certificated aircraft. However the laws of physics don't distinguish between homebuilts and type certificated aircraft, so we should only ignore ADs if we are prepared to experience the type of failure they are trying to prevent. -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (installing engine & electrics) Ottawa, Canada http://members.rogers.com/khorton/rv8.html http://eccentrix.com/misc/rv8/rv8.html ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 21, 2002
From: Kevin Horton <khorton(at)cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: Message for Kevin Horton
> >Hello Kevin > I tried to have a look at your project tonight and everytime I got >a message saying"Could not open page", trying your web site address thru >Van's site ended with the same results. > Have you change your web site' address?? > I've been monitoring your progress from the start and I'll like to >know when you're gonna fly this thing.You also have some very good links on >your site. > >So Kevin,don't let us in the dark..lol > >Bruno Dionne Eccentrix, my free web page hoster, has been a bit up and down lately. High speed internet finally became available out in the sticks where we are, so I've just got a new ISP. My web page is now mirrored at: <http://members.rogers.com/khorton/rv8.html> I'm not sure yet which location will be the most reliable. -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (installing engine & electrics) Ottawa, Canada http://members.rogers.com/khorton/rv8.html http://eccentrix.com/misc/rv8/rv8.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rick Jory" <rickjory(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: need tools
Date: Mar 21, 2002
Mark . . . you'll get a number of different opinions on this. I think Avery, Cleaveland, Brown are excellent companies for tools. The only differentiator I'd share is that the Avery hand squeezer, IMHO, is better than the Tatco (I've owned both and sold the Tatco). I ended up with a Sioux "palm drill" and like its small size/weight. Anyway, good luck, Rick Jory RV8A ----- Original Message ----- From: Mark Antenbring <mantenbring(at)slcl.net> Subject: RV-List: need tools > > Is anyone willing to part with their tools? If no one has any, which company > should I go to buy a new set? A few people say Avery is the one, but it > seems that they are much more expensive. Is it worth it? Is it easy to sell > the tools once you are done? > Thanks, > Mark > > RV7 tail - 0% complete > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Wheeler North <wnorth(at)sdccd.cc.ca.us>
Subject: 1991 RV-4
Date: Mar 21, 2002
Mario was a very nice old gentleman, His hangar was directly behind mine at SEE Sky Harbor. I have no details as to accident. He was very familiar with area as he landed there often. Was high wind day is all I know so far. Scuttlebutt is the plane hit upright, skipped and flipped before engaging in fire. He was a quiet type so many folks probably never met him. He came by to check progress on my plane often, never staying long enough to be a disruption, but he really loved flying. Although he was not very active locally he will be missed at our corner of the airport. If I find out more I'll post it. W From: ABAYMAN(at)aol.com Subject: Re: RV-List: anyone has more info? IDENTIFICATION Regis#: 491T Make/Model: EXP Description: EXP-1991 RV-4 Date: 03/15/2002 Time: 2145 Event Type: Accident Highest Injury: Fatal Mid Air: N Missing: N Damage: Destroyed LOCATION City: JACUMBA State: CA Country: US DESCRIPTION EXPERIMENTAL ACFT CRASHED UNDER UNKNOWN CIRCUMSTANCES AND WAS DESTROYED BY FIRE, THE PILOT/SOLE OCCUPANT SUFFERED FATAL INJURIES, JACUMBA, CA. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ABAYMAN(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 21, 2002
Subject: Re: first flight insurance
hi guys that is what guys we have left on this list, i was wondering when do i purchase insurance on my rv. i think the builders risk policy covers the 1st flight (s). can i just call and get a binder after the 1st flight? do i have to prepurchase a policy? john helms, wanta step in and inform me. thanks scott tampa getting ready for inspection ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Helms" <jhelms(at)i1.net>
Subject: Re: first flight insurance
Date: Mar 21, 2002
Builders Risk coverages DO NOT cover first flight... they are GROUND NOT IN MOTION coverages. Ground not in motion is just like it sounds.... it would not cover you while taxiing the aircraft. However, transitioning a Builders risk to an in-motion policy takes a phone call. (to save you and I the headache and heartache of not getting it done on your cell phone while waiting to crank her up, try to call me as soon as you know the day you would potentially move the airplane under its own power.) I recommend that if you are going to taxi it in a couple of days, give me a call. As I indicated above, this is best as I am usually swamped with phone calls (like all good brokers are) and you may have to leave a message. My suggestion would be to leave a detailed message like "I need to switch to in motion coverage on xx/xx date." This will move your message to the top of the list. JT ----- Original Message ----- From: <ABAYMAN(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: first flight insurance hi guys that is what guys we have left on this list, i was wondering when do i purchase insurance on my rv. i think the builders risk policy covers the 1st flight (s). can i just call and get a binder after the 1st flight? do i have to prepurchase a policy? john helms, wanta step in and inform me. thanks scott tampa getting ready for inspection ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Eustace Bowhay" <ebowhay(at)jetstream.net>
Subject: Safety and operating costs
Date: Mar 21, 2002
----- Original Message ----- From: "Eustace Bowhay" <ebowhay(at)jetstream.net> Subject: Re: RV-List: Safety and operating costs > Hi Marty: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <emrath(at)comcast.net> > To: > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 7:34 PM > Subject: Re: RV-List: Safety and operating costs > > > > Eustace, While I'm using FI and no primer is needed, I think your readers > > would find it helpful to know the following: > > > > 1. Did you "T" into the supply line from the Gascolator to the mechanical > > fuel pump and, > > No the fuel supply was taken from the plug in the top of the gascolator. > > > 2. are you priming more than one cylinder since you indicate "T" into the > > "primer lines" on the back of the engine and, > > Yes I primed three cylinders and the fouth was used for manifold pressure. > > > 3. is there one 3" loop at the solenoid and at the "T" into the primer > > lines? > > The loops (probably more like 2 1/2 inches) were side by side between the > solonoid and the back baffle. > > When I switched to fuel injection the gascolator went into the wing root, > for two reasons.One to make it more accesable for draining and cooler, the > other to avoid having it pressured up by putting the boost pump down stream > from the gascolator. > > Eustace > > > > Marty in Brentwood TN > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Eustace Bowhay" <ebowhay(at)jetstream.net> > > To: "rv list" > > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:36 PM > > Subject: RV-List: Safety and operating costs > > > > > > > > > > Following the discussion on primers, associated problems and the need > > > for them I would like to throw in my two cents worth. > > > > > > When I built my RV 6 I started out with a carburated engine and when the > > > time came to address the primer question it wasn't a question of > > > should I install one but what was the best way to do it. I don't want to > > > keep this discussion going but the need for a primer I guess varies > > > with the conditions one is operating in and the expertise of the > > > individual,and to certain extent the condition of the aircraft. > > > > > > In my case I am in a cool climate and although as I have mentioned I > > > preheat for the first start anytime the temperature is below freezing it > > > still needs priming to start.The reason I preheat even at the freezing > > > point is to save the wear and tear on the starter and battery and to > > > keep the oil pressure down a bit on start up. Priming with the throttle > > > in the right conditions and done properly works well but some day when > > > the temperatures are down and the battery or starter is just not right > > > up to snuff and maybe a mag is in need of some attention you get a > > > backfire and you will have a fire. I have seen several over the years in > > > two instances the aircraft where destroyed. > > > > > > My priorities when installing the primer were simplicity and a accurate > > > way to get the right amount of prime as well as a safe installation. At > > > that time my gascolator was firewall mounted on the lower left. To use a > > > plunger type would mean a lot of plumbing and more firewall > > > penetrations. A electric solenoid mounted on the firewall with a six > > > inch run of flexible firesleeved #3 line to the gascolator and a spring > > > loaded switch to off made a tidy installation. From the solenoid to the > > > tee on the primer lines on the back of the engine was 1/8 copper with a > > > double three inch loop. > > > > > > This virtually eliminates any possibly of having any fuel leaked into > > > the engine compartment in flight. It wouldn't matter if the copper line > > > broke the solenoid would be closed preventing and fuel from leaking. > > > > > > To prime with this system is boost pump on, primer on and count 1234 or > > > whatever is required. > > > > > > Eustace Bowhay Blind Bay, B.C. Wiring and fiberglass fairings 6A. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ken Harrill <KHarrill(at)osa.state.sc.us>
Subject: More Hartzell Propeller AD Info
Date: Mar 21, 2002
RVs won't be on the list of aircraft in the AD because RVs are not type certificated aircraft. However the laws of physics don't distinguish between homebuilts and type certificated aircraft, so we should only ignore ADs if we are prepared to experience the type of failure they are trying to prevent. -- Kevin, I could not agree with you more. I was passing along my experience with my prop shop as information only, to be used in addressing the compliance with regulations/AD's, etc. The more pressing question is: how much risk am I taking by doing RV type aerobatics with this prop? Is the risk so great that I should replace the hub($$$), or is an eddy current inspection every 150 hours, as required by the AD, adequate? I don't know these answers and would appreciate the opinions of other, more knowledgeable members of the List. Tim Lewis, thanks for posting the comments by Kevin Ryan from Hartzell. Ken Harrill RV-6, almost ready to fly ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 21, 2002
Subject: Re: Engine choice gone
From: Denis Walsh <deniswalsh(at)earthlink.net>
If I were you I would rejoice. Would you really have rather bought a Lycoming engine from a (slightly) dishonest person?? Not Me. You are far better off having found out he is a liar, than to have gained a questionable engine. > From: "Konrad Werner" <Connywerner(at)wans.net> > Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 19:11:09 -0700 > To: > Subject: Re: RV-List: Engine choice gone > > > Steve, > > Could you wait a little before hiring your lawyer (or "Attorney", that's how > fancy lawyers want to be addressed)? > Let me sign up for Law School early tomorrow morning to help you. Honestly, > I mean it! I do offer to represent you, but not on a contingency, but rather > $/hr spent, once done with law school!! That will become some of the best > and easiest money I ever made. > But we all know you were just joking about hiring a willing lawyer! Oh well, > farewell my imaginary easy-cash. > > Too bad it didn't work out, but let go, as the other guy does not stand to > his word (or probably any other commitment he makes for this matter). > Sorry for your lost opportunity though. > I know it hurts, it just hurts. > > Konrad > ABQ-NM > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve Hurlbut" <hurlbut_steve(at)hotmail.com> > To: ; > Subject: RV-List: Engine choice gone > > >> >> We'll today was the most frusterating day in my RV building career. After >> searching for an engine for over 1 year I found the one of my dreams. The >> AEIO-360 B4A with 81 hrs SMOH. Unfortunately the owner just sold it from >> under my nose after agreeing that it was mine. Its amazing what money will >> do to people (hes not a RV guy). Next week I'll talk to a lawyer and sue > for >> reinbursement of phone calls and research time. >> >> In the meantime back to the fuselage with my chin up. >> >> Anybody have an engine? Just kidding! >> Steve >> RV-7A >> >> >> MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: >> http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx >> >> > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "C. Rabaut" <crabaut(at)coalinga.com>
Subject: Gascolator pressure Limits
Date: Mar 21, 2002
Chris, My pressure settled down to about 28 PSI after running it plugged after the mechanical pump (per "Don" at Airflow Performance's recommendation to let it "normalize"). I replaced the rubber seal in the gascolator and it "SEEMS" to be holding. I might dump the gascolator all together (I do have the Airflow Performance in-line filter prior to the boost pump). Chuck ----- Original Message ----- From: C J Heitman <cjh(at)execpc.com> Subject: RE: RV-List: Gascolator pressure Limits > > Chuck, > > My Airflow Performance pump assembly was furnished with a 25 psi pressure > relief valve plumbed into it. Yours may be stuck closed, installed backwards > or somehow plumbed incorrectly. I have mine piped back to the outlet of the > fuel selector so that the fuel has a chance to cool before returning to the > pump when being bypassed. I would be concerned with damaging the injection > servo with a pressure that high. > > Chris Heitman > Dousman WI > RV-9A N94ME (reserved) > http://www.execpc.com/~cjh/rv9a.html > > -----Original Message----- > > > Hi Guys (& gals), > > I just pressure tested my new plumbing for my IO-320 boost pump from > "Airflow Performance" (cost $508.58 O.T.D.). The pump went to almost 50 PSI > when I first flipped it on and blew out my rubber seal on my gascolator (the > one I bought from Van's). Other folks have told me that Van's gascolator > could/would support the boost pumps up to about 40-50 PSI. Anyone with any > comments, suggestions, humorous remarks... ? Yes, I will probably cough-up > the bucks and buy an AnAir gascolator (anyone got one for sale/re-sale?), if > I have too... But I was tryin' to save up for the Christen inverted oil > system (anyone got one of these for cheap?). I called "Don" at Airflow > Performance and he said their boost pump should normalize at about 30 PSI > and he even commented that Van's gascolator should work okay, "Other guys > have used them...". Okay, I'll take my replies "off-air". Thanks, > > Chuck > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Perry" <eperry(at)san.rr.com>
"Rv-List(at)Matronics.Com" ,
Subject: Hartzell prop for sale on eBay
Date: Mar 21, 2002
I don't know if this is good for anybody but it sure looks like it's nice. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item1712850348 Ed Perry eperry(at)san.rr.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: LeastDrag93066(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 21, 2002
Subject: Re: More Hartzell Propeller AD Info
Hi All, I have a hartzell prop with the Rev. A hub from a HR2 for my HR2. When I talked to Hartzell, I was told that, since it came off of an aerobatic airplane, and is going onto an aerobatic airplane, it qualified for the free hub replacement. (However, it needs to go through a prop shop for an overhaul to get the free hub.) My prop is in the prop shop now. I'll post the results when I get the prop back in a couple weeks. Jim Ayers RV-3 N47RV LOM M332A engine RV-4 with Harmon mod kit :-) IO-540-C4B5 with Monty Barrett mod kit :-) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Van Artsdalen, Scott" <svanarts(at)unionsafe.com>
Subject: Pinholes
Date: Mar 21, 2002
A recent Rvator had an article on prepping the cowling for paint. Sorry I can't remember the exact issue or process but perhaps it will jog somone's memory who might have their Rvator handy. I can summarize when I get home if no one beats me to it. It did talk specifically about filling pinholes on the S cowl. Scott VanArtsdalen, MCSE, CCNA Network Administrator Union Safe Deposit Bank 209-946-5116 -----Original Message----- From: Austin [mailto:6430(at)axion.net] Subject: RV-List: Pinholes Hi Listers, I spent 4 hours yesterday shooting primer on all my fibreglass parts and was blown away..no pun intended...at the appearance of pinholes in the S cowl.... Until you shoot a prime on it, it is just not visible as to how porous it looks. GAWD, it looks just like screen mesh for a screen door....I know my primer ain't going to fill that..have you seen the same ? What is the best remedy to fill before thinking about top color ? I did try some superfill and epoxy over part of it but the results were not too great and it is very labor intensive for such a big area....what have you guys done ?? Any input appreciated. Thanks, Austin Vancouver. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stephen Johnson" <spjohnsn(at)ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: More Hartzell Propeller AD Info
Date: Mar 21, 2002
Ken, As I understand the physics of the situation, the extra stress on the prop would be from gyroscopic forces in maneuvers like snap rolls. I don't intend to snap my RV-8, so the easy answer would be to forget it. On the other hand, a spin would put the same kind of forces on the prop, and RV's are known to be fast spinners. I don't think I'll be doing many spins, but a spin is always possible when doing aerobatics. Steve Johnson RV-8 Finishing wings ----- Original Message ----- > > > The more pressing question is: how much risk am I taking by doing RV type > aerobatics with this prop? Is the risk so great that I should replace the > hub($$$), or is an eddy current inspection every 150 hours, as required by > the AD, adequate? I don't know these answers and would appreciate the > opinions of other, more knowledgeable members of the List. > > Tim Lewis, thanks for posting the comments by Kevin Ryan from Hartzell. > > > Ken Harrill > RV-6, almost ready to fly ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Joe Larson" <jpl(at)showpage.org>
Subject: Re: RV-List Digest: 88 Msgs - 03/20/02
Date: Mar 21, 2002
I dunno -- most of those lightening holes are behind the CG, and RVs tend to have problems bumping into the aft limits. Dropping even a few ounces off the tail is probably worth a lot more than a few pounds up front. -Joe > I did the lightening holes in the beginning but later started judging > the weight saving (or lack thereof) with the work involved on the > smaller pieces and opted not to drill the holes in some cases. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: VS-809PP
Date: Mar 21, 2002
From: "Kendall R. Simmons" <ken(at)truckstop.com>
I did some quick calculations on the VS-808PP and came up with a weight savings of about 3 ounces. It doesn't seem like much, but that far aft it might make a difference especially on a plane with electric elevator trim and rudder nav light(like mine). Ken I dunno -- most of those lightening holes are behind the CG, and RVs tend to have problems bumping into the aft limits. Dropping even a few ounces off the tail is probably worth a lot more than a few pounds up front. -Joe > I did the lightening holes in the beginning but later started judging > the weight saving (or lack thereof) with the work involved on the > smaller pieces and opted not to drill the holes in some cases. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "RV4" <VansRV4GRVMJ(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: form 8130
Date: Mar 21, 2002
Hi listers, Does anyone know if a Form 8130 applies to secondhand aircraft parts bought from Ebay for export from the US? Marcel ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Sears" <sears(at)searnet.com>
Subject: Re: VS-809PP
Date: Mar 21, 2002
> I did some quick calculations on the VS-808PP and came up with a weight > savings of about 3 ounces. It doesn't seem like much, but that far aft > it might make a difference especially on a plane with electric elevator > trim and rudder nav light(like mine). It still won't make that much difference. I have manual trim, which is really heavy due to the cable going to the back. I also have the tail light and a strobe back there. I have my ELT and strobe power pack behind the baggage compartment bulkhead. I didn't cut out any holes, like that. If you have a metal prop, especially constant speed, you're going to offset quite a bit of weight at the rear. The battery's being moved forward into the engine compartment will not hurt things, either. I even have a light weight starter in mine. The CG is in good shape. Of course, I do have the nose gear; but, I also have the O320 150hp engine that may take off some of that. Personally, I'd accept the extra strength and not do the holes. Even with the tandem seating, I'm betting you have plenty of CG range. Jim Sears in KY RV-6A N198JS EAA Tech Counselor ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Carter" <dcarter(at)datarecall.net>
"aeroelectric-list"
Subject: Electrical shop tools - good price on solder gun & heat gun
Date: Mar 21, 2002
Just burned out my 2nd Archer (Radio Shack) 100 watt solder gun. Wasn't heating 16 gage wire very fast (would melt solder but not heat the wires very fast) - kept it on way too long and eventuall something inside went "poof" and smoked. Did search on internet and found Weller brand, Model 8200 100/150 watt solder gun for $27.50 ($32.50 in kit with extra parts) at www.elexp.com (Electronics Express), 1-800-972-2225, 8:30-5 Eastern. Also ordered their Taiwanese RD7346B 600/1000 watt heat gun for heat shrink for $34.50. - Shipping will be $10 or less. Other web site prices for the Weller 8200 were $31.50 ($36.77 for kit) at www.unionel.com; ($39.99 for kit at Tools Plus www.tools-plus.com in CT); $38.38 ($44.70 for kit) at action-electronics.com in Santa Ana, CA. David Carter RV-6 QB Tail lights ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Randy Lervold" <randy@rv-8.com>
Subject: Condition inspection checklist
Date: Mar 21, 2002
The time for my very first condition inspection is fast approaching. There have been several references over the years to condition inspection checklists various builders have developed. Thinking that was a lifetime away I frankly didn't pay much attention to the topic -- yikes, now I need one. Can anyone point me to examples of a well developed checklist for an RV? I know we should comply with a certain section of the FARs (don't have


March 17, 2002 - March 21, 2002

RV-Archive.digest.vol-mo