RV-Archive.digest.vol-on

November 17, 2003 - November 24, 2003



      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 17, 2003
From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: Rivets and rivet guns, etc.
linn walters wrote: > > Lyle Peterson wrote: > > >>I apologize if you get several copies of this message. I am subscribed >>to several RV lists. >> > > Ah, my golden opportunity. Why do you subscribe to multiple lists. Let > me answer that. Because you want to get the best/most advice you can. > Same reason I do. I'm presently on 5 lists. Let's say you are too. > That's 5 posts that show up in my inbox. And then 5 really knowlegeable > folks answer on each list. We're up to 30. Then a few (like this one) > that don't really answer your question. 35. All from one post. Yeah, > you get the picture ..... and you're struggling too! Now, I can always > delete some of the replies .... but which ones? And what about the > replies that folks didn't change the subject on??? I feel a migraine > coming on! What to do, what to do. I don't have an real good answer, > folks, but I'm inundated with emails, and I haven't even ordered my -10 > kit yet!!! But I do have a suggestion: Send general questions to the > RV-LIST (like your rivet gun question .... which I want to know about > too, and what's the difference between 1X and 3X), and -10 specific > questions to the -10 list. That should cut down on the number of > messages somewhat. That's what I try to do. I have an even better suggestion. Use the archive search engine for the various lists. If you run a search on the RV-list archives for rivet guns instead of posting your question to the list, you will get nine gazillion hits with opinions on the various features of the different guns, and the rest of the list will be spared seeing all nine gazillion opinions repeated for the fourth gazillionth time. :-) Sam Buchanan ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Phil N" <pnewlon(at)toosan.com>
Subject: RE: Lyco engine #list
Date: Nov 17, 2003
If you have trouble with getting the engine spec list from the Lycoming site, I've copied it to my website: http://www.toosan.com/misc/SSP401.pdf Phil > Not Found > The requested object does not exist on this server. The link > you followed is either outdated, inaccurate, or the server > has been instructed not to let you have it. > > Copied direct from posting below and above is responce. They > must not like > me over there. Will try something else, thanks. KABONG ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 17, 2003
From: linn walters <lwalters2(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Rivets and rivet guns, etc.
Sam Buchanan wrote: > >linn walters wrote: > > >> >>Lyle Peterson wrote: >> >>> apologize if you get several copies of this message. I am subscribed >>>to several RV lists. >>> >> That should cut down on the number of >>messages somewhat. That's what I try to do. >> >>I have an even better suggestion. >> >>Use the archive search engine for the various lists. If you run a search >>on the RV-list archives for rivet guns instead of posting your question >>to the list, you will get nine gazillion hits with opinions on the >>various features of the different guns, and the rest of the list will be >>spared seeing all nine gazillion opinions repeated for the fourth >>gazillionth time. :-) >> >>Sam Buchanan >> Sam, you're absolutely right. Amazing how many times the same thread appears and again takes on a life of it's own. So, now we have three options: 1. Search the archives first. 2. Ask RV generic questions to the RV-LIST. 3. Ask RV-10 specific questions to the RV-10-LIST. Any other votes? Nah, really don't want to start a food fight!!!! Linn ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "rv6tc" <rv6tc(at)myawai.com>
Subject: Re: EAA Young Eagles paranoid concern....
Date: Nov 17, 2003
Smoky! Wow. Nice reference! And from a FIGHTER PILOT??????? Don't let the guys back at the Squadron find out. Keith Hughes RV-6 finish T-38, C-141, B-737 Denver ----- Original Message ----- From: "rob ray" <smokyray(at)yahoo.com> > > I for one think Shakespear was right. > > RR > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dan Checkoway" <dan(at)rvproject.com>
Subject: Re: GPS Antenna
Date: Nov 17, 2003
Neil...one word of advice. I chose to mount mine there as well. I haven't flown yet, but I made one tiny mistake when building the shelf. I didn't even think ahead about how the top cowl hinge would stick out about 3/4" from the top skin flange. The hinge does end up over the aft edge of the antenna very slightly. I'm not too worried about it being shadowed, since it's barely covered, but it's something to think about when you build yours...position your antenna with cowl fasteners in mind! Photos of my crappy installation on the bottom of this page: http://www.rvproject.com/20030824.html Hope this helps, )_( Dan RV-7 N714D http://www.rvproject.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Neil Henderson" <neil.mo51(at)btopenworld.com> Subject: RV-List: GPS Antenna > > Listers > > I'm planning on mounting my GPS antenna on a firewall forward bracket just under the top surface of the cowl, rather than on the scuttle under the windscreen or externally. This seems to be a favoured place adopted by many builders. My question is will this location work satisfactorily with the standard antenna supplied with a Garmin 196 or is this only appropriate with a powered active unit. Thanks for your input. > > Neil Henderson RV9A nr Aylesbury UK > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "rv6tc" <rv6tc(at)myawai.com>
Subject: Re: EAA Young Eagles paranoid concern....
Date: Nov 17, 2003
Hey Bruce, I just spilled my Starbucks all over my lap and ran my car into a Home Depot. Could you help me sue Starbucks, GMC, and Home Depot and help me (any you) make a few million dollars?? Yes, it's a broad brush. Yes to some it's unfair. But if you can't see what greedy trial lawyers have done to our economy..... Well, go buy a power tool or a toaster and look at all the disclaimers packaged therein. The Trial Lawyers have taken stupid behavior, like bathing with a blow dryer, and made it criminal negligence on the part of the manufacture, as well as VERY profitable for their profession. The associated costs get passed on to consumers (economics 101), many of whom do not have the ability to charge $300 + dollars per hour to pay for the increased costs. So before you get your feathers too ruffled, realize that many of us are just plain sick and tired of the lack of judgment shown in our current legal system. So taken out of context? Maybe. Lets take a poll and find out how many of us LIKE it taken out of context. I'll start with a vote in the affirmative. Have a tort day, Keith Hughes RV-6 finish Denver Paying too &%$& %$ much for insurance. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Green" <mailindex(at)juno.com> > > > So Rob Ray, now that you have demonstrated your ignorance of Shakespear, > do you still think he was right? > > Bruce Green > Eagle N110GM > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bobby Sather" <sather(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: EAA Young Eagles paranoid concern....
Date: Nov 17, 2003
I vote affirmative and believe an attorney should never hold office. ----- Original Message ----- From: rv6tc <rv6tc(at)myawai.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: EAA Young Eagles paranoid concern.... > > Hey Bruce, > > I just spilled my Starbucks all over my lap and ran my car into a Home > Depot. Could you help me sue Starbucks, GMC, and Home Depot and help me > (any you) make a few million dollars?? > > Yes, it's a broad brush. Yes to some it's unfair. But if you can't see > what greedy trial lawyers have done to our economy..... Well, go buy a power > tool or a toaster and look at all the disclaimers packaged therein. The > Trial Lawyers have taken stupid behavior, like bathing with a blow dryer, > and made it criminal negligence on the part of the manufacture, as well as > VERY profitable for their profession. The associated costs get passed on to > consumers (economics 101), many of whom do not have the ability to charge > $300 + dollars per hour to pay for the increased costs. So before you get > your feathers too ruffled, realize that many of us are just plain sick and > tired of the lack of judgment shown in our current legal system. > > So taken out of context? Maybe. Lets take a poll and find out how many of > us LIKE it taken out of context. I'll start with a vote in the affirmative. > > Have a tort day, > > Keith Hughes > RV-6 finish > Denver > Paying too &%$& > %$ much for insurance. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bruce Green" <mailindex(at)juno.com> > > > > > > > So Rob Ray, now that you have demonstrated your ignorance of Shakespear, > > do you still think he was right? > > > > Bruce Green > > Eagle N110GM > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Charles Rowbotham" <crowbotham(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: GPS Antenna
Date: Nov 17, 2003
Neil, We installed Getz's hockey puck GPS ant on top of the glare shield. It's flat black like our glareshield - small and has worked great. Chuck & Dave Rowbotham RV-8A >From: "Neil Henderson" <neil.mo51(at)btopenworld.com> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: RV-List: GPS Antenna >Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:22:51 -0000 > > >Listers > >I'm planning on mounting my GPS antenna on a firewall forward bracket just >under the top surface of the cowl, rather than on the scuttle under the >windscreen or externally. This seems to be a favoured place adopted by many >builders. My question is will this location work satisfactorily with the >standard antenna supplied with a Garmin 196 or is this only appropriate >with a powered active unit. Thanks for your input. > >Neil Henderson RV9A nr Aylesbury UK > > MSN Shopping upgraded for the holidays! Snappier product search... http://shopping.msn.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 17, 2003
From: rob ray <smokyray(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: EAA Young Eagles paranoid concern....
Amen. Unless they run on a platform of tort reform. Bobby Sather wrote: I vote affirmative and believe an attorney should never hold office. ----- Original Message ----- From: rv6tc Subject: Re: RV-List: EAA Young Eagles paranoid concern.... > > Hey Bruce, > > I just spilled my Starbucks all over my lap and ran my car into a Home > Depot. Could you help me sue Starbucks, GMC, and Home Depot and help me > (any you) make a few million dollars?? > > Yes, it's a broad brush. Yes to some it's unfair. But if you can't see > what greedy trial lawyers have done to our economy..... Well, go buy a power > tool or a toaster and look at all the disclaimers packaged therein. The > Trial Lawyers have taken stupid behavior, like bathing with a blow dryer, > and made it criminal negligence on the part of the manufacture, as well as > VERY profitable for their profession. The associated costs get passed on to > consumers (economics 101), many of whom do not have the ability to charge > $300 + dollars per hour to pay for the increased costs. So before you get > your feathers too ruffled, realize that many of us are just plain sick and > tired of the lack of judgment shown in our current legal system. > > So taken out of context? Maybe. Lets take a poll and find out how many of > us LIKE it taken out of context. I'll start with a vote in the affirmative. > > Have a tort day, > > Keith Hughes > RV-6 finish > Denver > Paying too &%$& > %$ much for insurance. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bruce Green" > > > > > > > So Rob Ray, now that you have demonstrated your ignorance of Shakespear, > > do you still think he was right? > > > > Bruce Green > > Eagle N110GM > > > > --------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 17, 2003
From: Rick Galati <rick6a(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Food Fight
Well....yes Sam (and others) are quite right......as far as the argument goes. I suppose a routine archival search would prove there is "nothing new under the sun". Who can deny that many basic questions we see posed again and again have long ago been suitably answered by many sources including (but by no means limited to) Van's "Preview Plans" or "21 Years of the RVator"? Potential and/or newbie RV builders benefit greatly from many builder experiences and will learn soon enough to divine an informed opinion from a stew of ill-informed fertilizer out there. As far as this list in concerned, I submit that archives, as valuable a resource as they are, do not provide the sort of dynamic immediacy that a timely opinion shared by an active list subscriber can offer, providing of course, he is willing to give it. To my mind, virtually everyone who participates on this list is here for one of two reasons, to either learn information or to share information. Is it really t oo much to ask to be patient with those who reasonably ask what you so long ago discovered in your own way? People and fashion come and go all the time. Were this not so, we'd have nothing to talk about as we silently pass each other on a nondescript two lane e-road leading into and out of the archives. Rick Galati RV-6A finishing Sam Buchanan wrote: I have an even better suggestion. Use the archive search engine for the various lists. If you run a search on the RV-list archives for rivet guns instead of posting your question to the list, you will get nine gazillion hits with opinions on the various features of the different guns, and the rest of the list will be spared seeing all nine gazillion opinions repeated for the fourth gazillionth time. :-) Sam Buchanan --------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John" <n1cxo320(at)salidaco.com>
Subject: Safety Concerns
Date: Nov 17, 2003
I have always timed my Lycoming with the #1 cylinder at TDC and the timing mark aligned with the case halves. This has worked for a long time. I now want to get more technical and have purchased a fancy digital timing light that has a LCD screen with direct read out. My concern is: How to use the light on a running engine...I have an RV6A and would have to be up on a step stool behind the prop in order to see what's going on. The notion of slipping off the stool, or otherwise getting tangled up in the prop has me, frankly, more than "concerned" -I can't see standing in from of the prop with the engine going and using the light.... What do you techies do in such a situation? (And, yes, I have checked the archives first.) John ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 17, 2003
From: Allen Mecum <mecum(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: EAA Young Eagles paranoid concern....
As a father of two sons who really did not have the love of flying as I do, I want to thank all of you who did take the risk and make it possible for kids to find out what it is like to "slip the silvery bonds of earth and touch the face of god". Both of my sons now love to fly. Thanks to my father Kabong, Gummibear and the Apple Valley EAA Chapter, we will be a flying family for another generation . I still remember my first flight and my sons tell their friends about thiers and show the video and as they tell the story the RV grin still shows up! Allen Mecum rob ray wrote: Amen. Unless they run on a platform of tort reform. Bobby Sather wrote: I vote affirmative and believe an attorney should never hold office. ----- Original Message ----- From: rv6tc Subject: Re: RV-List: EAA Young Eagles paranoid concern.... > > Hey Bruce, > > I just spilled my Starbucks all over my lap and ran my car into a Home > Depot. Could you help me sue Starbucks, GMC, and Home Depot and help me > (any you) make a few million dollars?? > > Yes, it's a broad brush. Yes to some it's unfair. But if you can't see > what greedy trial lawyers have done to our economy..... Well, go buy a power > tool or a toaster and look at all the disclaimers packaged therein. The > Trial Lawyers have taken stupid behavior, like bathing with a blow dryer, > and made it criminal negligence on the part of the manufacture, as well as > VERY profitable for their profession. The associated costs get passed on to > consumers (economics 101), many of whom do not have the ability to charge > $300 + dollars per hour to pay for the increased costs. So before you get > your feathers too ruffled, realize that many of us are just plain sick and > tired of the lack of judgment shown in our current legal system. > > So taken out of context? Maybe. Lets take a poll and find out how many of > us LIKE it taken out of context. I'll start with a vote in the affirmative. > > Have a tort day, > > Keith Hughes > RV-6 finish > Denver > Paying too &%$& > %$ much for insurance. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bruce Green" > > > > > > > So Rob Ray, now that you have demonstrated your ignorance of Shakespear, > > do you still think he was right? > > > > Bruce Green > > Eagle N110GM > > > > --------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 17, 2003
From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: Food Fight
Bob Hassel wrote: > > Rick and Phil, > > I agree with you totally! Something's change and evolve over time, like the > plans, the tools and if we're really lucky ourselves. Someone may even > actually have new insight to share or a new approach to an old problem. > > If you don't like the question - then use the delete key. Having a bad hair > day doesn't entitle anyone to give a bad hair day to everyone else. > > I've had my list of stupid questions and thankfully, everyone was generous > with their replies, insight and kindness to me. > > So thanks to everyone for putting up with another newbie, who really needs > and appreciates the wisdom, experience and the kindness that is so often > freely given on this list. > > Sam your experiences are greatly appreciated and sought after. I consider > you an incredible resource within a group of incredible resources so please > don't think I'm slamming or flaming here. > > Perhaps the newbie questions could be left to those who were recently > newbie's. Give the 'old timers' a break for the really tough nuts & give > the recently ex-newbie's a chance to share even if it is just limited > experience...just a thought. > There have been many good comments offered in this thread even though I am not sassified with the perceived value of one particular lister...... ;-) The main point I wished to make was, "check the archives first, and if a satisfactory answer can't be found, then let the questions fly". We were all newbies at one point and I am grateful to those who assisted me when the experimental aviation bug first bit. One thing that will make it easier to address questions is to make the questions fairly specific; it is much easier to answer "what is the difference between a 2X and 3X rivet gun" than to attempt to grapple with "what is the absolute best rivet gun for building airplanes?". Best wishes to all the builders who are just now embarking on the fascinating journey toward flying their home-built aircraft! Sam Buchanan ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 17, 2003
From: Kevin Horton <khorton01(at)rogers.com>
Subject: Re: EAA Young Eagles paranoid concern....
> > >OK... a little closer to home. Remember Van's demonstrator RV-8 crashed >with 100 or so hours, killing a Van's employee and prospective buyer. >Remember the disposition of this? According to Van's, the insurance company >representing Van's SETTLED with the parties bringing suit. Not I'm just a >dumb-ass West Texas boy, but why would you settle, after an independent >engineering company verified (very accurately) the calculated strength of >your design? Have you heard anything indicating that Van had a flaw in the >wing spar on the RV-8? Have you seen a change to the design? Or could it >be that the insurance company knew they would save themselves cash by >settling? Now.... who ULTIMATELY pays that bill? You did, I did, everyone >who buys ANYTHING at Van's does, because Van has to pay the insurance >company, and we have to pay Van. Now... were YOU culpable in the crash? I >know I wasn't, and I haven't seen anything that indicates that Van's >Aircraft was culpable. Did the lawyers that brought these suits get paid? >Where did that cash come from? Oh yeah.... and where were the Judges and >juries in the above? > I beg to differ on this example. I agree that there is no evidence that the design was at fault. The evidence seems to suggest that the accident was due to an overstress, i.e. pilot error. And the pilot-in-command was a Vans employee, flying a demo flight for Vans. So I suspect there is every chance a jury would have found that Vans was at fault, as the company had a duty to ensure that the demo flights were flown in a safe and prudent manner. -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (finishing kit) Ottawa, Canada http://go.phpwebhosting.com/~khorton/rv8/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 17, 2003
From: rob ray <smokyray(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Food Fight
Well said Y'All, I enjoy a good food fight every once in awhile...The positive side of this is the support for new people out there, keep it flowing! Some of us started our RV's way before there was an RV List, Van's website or side by side nosedraggers...sure would have been nice to get questions answered by somebody in the thick of it...rather than experimentation.... RR ps: BTW, I don't hate lawyers, just the law system... Sam Buchanan wrote: Bob Hassel wrote: > > Rick and Phil, > > I agree with you totally! Something's change and evolve over time, like the > plans, the tools and if we're really lucky ourselves. Someone may even > actually have new insight to share or a new approach to an old problem. > > If you don't like the question - then use the delete key. Having a bad hair > day doesn't entitle anyone to give a bad hair day to everyone else. > > I've had my list of stupid questions and thankfully, everyone was generous > with their replies, insight and kindness to me. > > So thanks to everyone for putting up with another newbie, who really needs > and appreciates the wisdom, experience and the kindness that is so often > freely given on this list. > > Sam your experiences are greatly appreciated and sought after. I consider > you an incredible resource within a group of incredible resources so please > don't think I'm slamming or flaming here. > > Perhaps the newbie questions could be left to those who were recently > newbie's. Give the 'old timers' a break for the really tough nuts & give > the recently ex-newbie's a chance to share even if it is just limited > experience...just a thought. > There have been many good comments offered in this thread even though I am not sassified with the perceived value of one particular lister...... ;-) The main point I wished to make was, "check the archives first, and if a satisfactory answer can't be found, then let the questions fly". We were all newbies at one point and I am grateful to those who assisted me when the experimental aviation bug first bit. One thing that will make it easier to address questions is to make the questions fairly specific; it is much easier to answer "what is the difference between a 2X and 3X rivet gun" than to attempt to grapple with "what is the absolute best rivet gun for building airplanes?". Best wishes to all the builders who are just now embarking on the fascinating journey toward flying their home-built aircraft! Sam Buchanan --------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Lenleg(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 17, 2003
Subject: Re: EAA Young Eagles paranoid concern....
I heard an ad today on a local radio station asking if you have ever lost money in the stock market ... 401K program, etc ... contact the law firm of _ _ _ you could be entitled to get all of your money back.... this is when I don't like lawyers ... encouraging frivilous suits ... for their pockets !!!! Len Leggette, RV-8A Greensboro, NC N910LL 166 hrs ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 17, 2003
From: Dan DeNeal <rv6apilot(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Remote control winch?
I have a winch that was left in my hangar from the last person that had the hangar. I thought I would never need it to pull my RV6a into the hangar since the RV's are easy to push or pull. The end or March this past year we had some snow that blanketed the area leaving the taxiway in front of my hangar very slippery. When I realized I couldn't push the plane back into the hangar because of the ice, I grabbed the cable on the winch and hooked it to the RV. The winch saved the day!!! The winch is an old winch and uses an extension wire you have to unwind all the way to the front of the plane. Then you have to hold down the switch while the cable is winding up while your other hand is steering the front wheel. Where can I buy something like a garage door remote control that I could use to replace the extension wire. I'm looking for the remote and the receiver. I can find remotes but all the receivers seem to be attached to the garage door mechanisam. It just needs to start and stop. Dan DeNeal RV6A N256GD I love my plane!!! __________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 17, 2003
From: Charlie & Tupper England <cengland(at)netdoor.com>
Subject: Re: Remote control winch?
Dan DeNeal wrote: > >I have a winch that was left in my hangar from the >last person that had the hangar. I thought I would >never need it to pull my RV6a into the hangar since >the RV's are easy to push or pull. > >The end or March this past year we had some snow that >blanketed the area leaving the taxiway in front of my >hangar very slippery. When I realized I couldn't push >the plane back into the hangar because of the ice, I >grabbed the cable on the winch and hooked it to the >RV. >The winch saved the day!!! > >The winch is an old winch and uses an extension wire >you have to unwind all the way to the front of the >plane. Then you have to hold down the switch while the >cable is winding up while your other hand is steering >the front wheel. > >Where can I buy something like a garage door remote >control that I could use to replace the extension >wire. I'm looking for the remote and the receiver. I >can find remotes but all the receivers seem to be >attached to the garage door mechanisam. It just needs >to start and stop. > >Dan DeNeal >RV6A N256GD >I love my plane!!! > The requirement to hold the button might become a very important damage-prevention feature. How about a switch you can hold in (activate with) your teeth, wired in parallel to the retract button on your current controller? It then becomes a 'dead man' switch if you drop it. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 17, 2003
From: Dan DeNeal <rv6apilot(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Remote control winch?
Not if you put a stop switch on the cable if it gets that far. -- Charlie & Tupper England wrote: > England > > Dan DeNeal wrote: > > > > > >I have a winch that was left in my hangar from the > >last person that had the hangar. I thought I would > >never need it to pull my RV6a into the hangar since > >the RV's are easy to push or pull. > > > >The end or March this past year we had some snow > that > >blanketed the area leaving the taxiway in front of > my > >hangar very slippery. When I realized I couldn't > push > >the plane back into the hangar because of the ice, > I > >grabbed the cable on the winch and hooked it to the > >RV. > >The winch saved the day!!! > > > >The winch is an old winch and uses an extension > wire > >you have to unwind all the way to the front of the > >plane. Then you have to hold down the switch while > the > >cable is winding up while your other hand is > steering > >the front wheel. > > > >Where can I buy something like a garage door remote > >control that I could use to replace the extension > >wire. I'm looking for the remote and the receiver. > I > >can find remotes but all the receivers seem to be > >attached to the garage door mechanisam. It just > needs > >to start and stop. > > > >Dan DeNeal > >RV6A N256GD > >I love my plane!!! > > > > The requirement to hold the button might become a > very important > damage-prevention feature. How about a switch you > can hold in (activate > with) your teeth, wired in parallel to the retract > button on your > current controller? It then becomes a 'dead man' > switch if you drop it. > > > > Click on the > this > generous > _-> > Contributions > any other > Forums. > > http://www.matronics.com/chat > > http://www.matronics.com/subscription > http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV-List.htm > http://www.matronics.com/archives > http://www.matronics.com/photoshare > http://www.matronics.com/emaillists > > > > > __________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "JOHN STARN" <jhstarn(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Remote control winch?
Date: Nov 17, 2003
You might consider the "dead man" switch. All my pipe machines have them, very heavy duty, looks like a slipper made of metal. OR a sewing machine foot switch (might be too light duty) that you slip your foot into and slide on the floor as required. Would think somewhere inbetween these two is right size. Both work by pushing on pedal that is spring loaded and shuts off when you lift or remove your foot. They are not remote but are available and cheap. Do Not Achive KABONG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charlie & Tupper England" <cengland(at)netdoor.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: Remote control winch? > > Dan DeNeal wrote: > > > > >I have a winch that was left in my hangar from the > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Lyle Peterson" <lyleap(at)access4less.net>
, ,
Subject: No subject as you will give it a new one shortly after you flame
me
Date: Nov 18, 2003
SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS It is so disheartening to learn that aviators are so narrow minded and selfish. If you people had used one tenth of the energy you expended on blasting my question to providing useful information, you could have written a book. As is it you only demonstrated that you 1. Don't know the answers, 2. Think that your knowledge is so unique that it can't be shared, 3. You have an immense amount of time to waste, 4. You have absolutely no respect for other people, whether they be builders or not. Someone suggested that the question was 'stupid.' The only stupid question is one that you can't answer! I checked the archives for the "gazillion" answers to be found there. I found four and not all of them pertained directly to my question. None of them covered all the questions I had posed. A few responded off list. They probably did not want to be caught by the lords of the list giving information to a new builder. I do thank those few for the information they so generously shared. They are very unlike the rest of the listers. Some two thousand people on these lists and only a very few are willing to answer. Rather, several find the time to waste flaming the questioner. The thread continues under the guise of a 'Food Fight.' How charming! So many messages use an existing subject because so few of you have figured out how to start a new thread on the list. Shame, shame. Look at the bottom of the message for the information you need. You don't even have to ask a question of the list, and thus get flamed for a stupid question. I did envision one day flying it to Oshkosh. If I do, which is doubtful, I will park it in the Vintage area. There are some folks there that will talk decently to you about airplanes and lots of other things. If you get too many copies of this email, use the delete key. Thanks for nothing, Lyle Peterson ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Nolan" <jamespnolan(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Food Fight Watson Reply
Date: Nov 18, 2003
Terry, Was going to reply to your post directly to you but since I've read some of the other posts I'll reply online. Ditto, Ditto, Ditto Smart people don't make others feel stupid. They usually have patience and understanding. That must go for the one asking the question as well as the one answering it. Jim Nolan N444JN ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Howard Crawford <crawfordh(at)mac.panasonic.com>
er you flame me
Subject: No subject as you will give it a new one shortly aft
er you flame me
Date: Nov 18, 2003
Lyle, You got my vote. This is the first and last message that I will send to the RV list. I am tired of reading all the messages that have nothing to do with building an airplane by the all American Boys Club. If you don't belong to the club don't talk to us. I'm going to the RV10 group on YAHOO. Gone. -----Original Message----- From: Lyle Peterson [mailto:lyleap(at)access4less.net] rv7-list(at)matronics.com; rv8-list(at)matronics.com; rv9-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RV-List: No subject as you will give it a new one shortly after you flame me It is so disheartening to learn that aviators are so narrow minded and selfish. If you people had used one tenth of the energy you expended on blasting my question to providing useful information, you could have written a book. As is it you only demonstrated that you 1. Don't know the answers, 2. Think that your knowledge is so unique that it can't be shared, 3. You have an immense amount of time to waste, 4. You have absolutely no respect for other people, whether they be builders or not. Someone suggested that the question was 'stupid.' The only stupid question is one that you can't answer! I checked the archives for the "gazillion" answers to be found there. I found four and not all of them pertained directly to my question. None of them covered all the questions I had posed. A few responded off list. They probably did not want to be caught by the lords of the list giving information to a new builder. I do thank those few for the information they so generously shared. They are very unlike the rest of the listers. Some two thousand people on these lists and only a very few are willing to answer. Rather, several find the time to waste flaming the questioner. The thread continues under the guise of a 'Food Fight.' How charming! So many messages use an existing subject because so few of you have figured out how to start a new thread on the list. Shame, shame. Look at the bottom of the message for the information you need. You don't even have to ask a question of the list, and thus get flamed for a stupid question. I did envision one day flying it to Oshkosh. If I do, which is doubtful, I will park it in the Vintage area. There are some folks there that will talk decently to you about airplanes and lots of other things. If you get too many copies of this email, use the delete key. Thanks for nothing, Lyle Peterson ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stucklen, Frederic IFC" <Fred.Stucklen(at)UTCFuelCells.com>
Subject: Traveling
Date: Nov 18, 2003
listers, I'm traveling to New Mexico next week in my new RV-6A. I'm planning stops at 29G, 1H0 (overnight), CLK & AEG. Final destination is NM69, a private strip SE of TCS. Anybody interested in seeing a nice IFR panel implementation can email me off list for details when I'll be at the above airports..... Fred Stucklen RV-6A N926RV * Wrk E-mail: fred.stucklen(at)utcfuelcells.com * Hm E-mail: wstucklen1(at)cox.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: RV Formation Clinic, Jan. 16-18 in Lakeland Florida
Date: Nov 18, 2003
From: "Stewart, Michael (ISS Atlanta)" <mstewart(at)iss.net>
, , , Howdy, As many of you know, there is an RV Fly-In held January 17-18 2003 in Lakeland Florida. This year Team RV's 2nd annual formation clinic is being held there. Warm weather, blue skies, great facilities, and big runways all come together to make the perfect location for our winter training this year. This is a clinic, meaning its hands on. You will receive both ground and air instruction. This course is focused on the beginner, with room for the advanced formation flyer. All skill sets are welcomed and encouraged. There will be experienced instructors there to help the newcomers, and the experienced pilots will be there to chip in and gain valuable stick time. We need as many experienced pilots as we do the new guys. The cost is FREE, the value is priceless. This is a 2 day event, starting with the ground school portion Friday night, January 16th at 7:00pm lasting 2 hours. We will have dinner during the ground school. Saturday will be spent flying. Lots of flying. Newbees will spend their first formation flight in the right/back seat of an experienced pilot so you can first see how its done. Then you will get to fly a 2 ship with an experienced pilot in YOUR right/back seat. Then you will progress as your skills dictate. This is tremendous fun and opportunity for all and I again look forward to putting this on along with the other Team RV members as well as Stu McCurdy, the certification program administrator and flight lead for Falcon Flight. I encourage those of you who have been to one of these to lets your formation friends, experienced and new, know what a fun and challenging experience this is. Chime in on the lists, and forward to your interested RV pilots. So jump on over to the clinics website at http://mstewart.net/michael/rv/teamrv/formationclinic/2004/index.htm read about the details, and register. We hope to see you there. Michael Stewart Team RV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Rozendaal" <dougr(at)petroblend.com>
Subject: Re: Lycoming model codes
Date: Nov 18, 2003
Here is a link to a page with all the different designations and the differences. http://www.prime-mover.org/Engines/Lycoming/Lyc_Cert_list.html Tailwinds, Doug Rozendaaal > > > > >Does anyone know where I could obtain a listing of the model code designations for the different models of Lycoming engines? > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Denk" <akroguy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: PIREP first flight
Date: Nov 18, 2003
RV-List message posted by: "MSices" > > >I want to thank all of you who replied with helping ideas concerning my >first flight jitters. In the end I found a great local pilot, Bill Bruns, >to do my first flight. First flight took place Friday, November 14 at >around 11am. Bill flew above the airport at about 3000 feet. After >landing, Bill rolled back the canopy and said, "you've got a good airplane >here." That afternoon, on her -real- first flight, I took her up and can >confirm that statement. Everything tracked straight and true. The plane >is >a lot easier to land than I had envisioned. Take-off is a blast - after >getting the tail up, I added full power, and it throws you back in your >seat! Those of you who indicated that the -8's want to wheel land were >correct - after touching down with the mains, I let the stick go neutral >thinking that the tail would drop on its own, but it didn't - it was just >happy to be on the mains for a while. Finally, I nudged the stick back to >finish out a nice landing. The stall is very benign - no wing drop at all. >What a thrill! > >Only sqwauks are slightly low vacuum pressure (regulator adjustment), and >the prop is hunting a little at high RPM (I think I have this one figured >out). According to my Vision Microsystem, the highest oil temps were 195 >(but mostly I saw it at 170) and CHT's 395 (mostly at 260-350), so I don't >seem to have the overheating yet that some report with the angle valve >engine (it was only 40 deg. outside though). I was too busy calming down >on >this short flight to look at speeds or climb rates or anything like that, >but I will say that I had to bring the throttle way back while I was on >crosswind in the pattern in order to level off and slow down by the time I >got abeam the numbers :>. > > >Thanks again for all of your support over the years - looking forward to >meeting more of you at fly-ins. And, oh yeah, keep squashing them rivets. >Wanted to type that for a long time. > CONGRATULATIONS, Mike! See, told ya it's a sweet airplane. ;) Keep it high and close to home for a while. HAVE FUN! Brian Denk RV8 N94BD 351 hrs. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 18, 2003
From: flmike <flmike2001(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Remote control winch?
You might be able to adapt a wireless starter or keyless entry system like the car alarm guys sell. I think they can be had for $30 range. Nifty key fob control. Just be sure it is a stand-alone unit, not an alarm add-on. If the winch is 12 VDC, then you have the right power supply too. Mike __________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Charles Rowbotham" <crowbotham(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: PIREP first flight
Date: Nov 18, 2003
Mike, CONGRATULATIONS and WELL DONE !! Chuck & Dave Rowbotham RV-8A >From: "MSices" <msices(at)core.com> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: RV-List: PIREP first flight >Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 07:20:50 -0600 > > >I want to thank all of you who replied with helping ideas concerning my >first flight jitters. In the end I found a great local pilot, Bill Bruns, >to do my first flight. First flight took place Friday, November 14 at >around 11am. Bill flew above the airport at about 3000 feet. After >landing, Bill rolled back the canopy and said, "you've got a good airplane >here." That afternoon, on her -real- first flight, I took her up and can >confirm that statement. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Phil N" <pnewlon(at)toosan.com>
Subject: 4130 parts showing rust through primer
Date: Nov 18, 2003
OK, I'll saddle up and be the first to bite! I'm stopping by Loeb Electric tonight after work to pick up my new infrared heater so that I can start priming the stack of parts that's accumulated on my bench over the last week. Before I do that, can you expound a little on the problems you've seen with 4130 parts showing rust through the primer? I'd sure hate to have the same problem, and if I'm using the primer in question I may reconsider or redouble my efforts at getting as near-perfect a surface before priming. TIA, Phil Getting sassified with a little work on the tail (I can spell that better than empennage :-) > Will probably post some .jpg's of the 4130 parts that are > showing rust through one of the most frequently mentioned primers. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 18, 2003
From: Sam Buchanan <sbuc(at)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: No subject as you will give it a new one shortly after
you flame me Lyle Peterson wrote: > > It is so disheartening to learn that aviators are so narrow minded and > selfish. Hmmmmm.....doesn't sound like the hundreds of aviators I have been honored to meet over the years..... > > Someone suggested that the question was 'stupid.' The only stupid > question is one that you can't answer! That is a stretch. One poster referred to his questions as "stupid". Matter of fact, I bet all of us have asked some stupid questions at one time or another! :-) > > I checked the archives for the "gazillion" answers to be found there. I > found four and not all of them pertained directly to my question. None > of them covered all the questions I had posed. Interesting. Here are the results of my searches in the archive with keywords from the original post: "rivet gun" 917 hits "3X" 555 hits "2X" 971 hits "rivet sets" 146 hits "C frame" 89 hits "swivel set" 70 hits "yokes" 226 hits "pneumatic" 968 hits "rivet squeezer" 291 hits Obviously nobody would want to read all those posts. But a ton of good info is in the archives, much more than just "four" posts. > I did envision one day flying it to Oshkosh. If I do, which is > doubtful, I will park it in the Vintage area. There are some folks > there that will talk decently to you about airplanes and lots of other > things. I am sure that is true. You will no doubt find the "Vintage" aviators to be very decent folks.......just as you will find the RVers to be if you change your mind and decide to park in their area. :-) Matter of fact, many of us have owned Vintage aircraft in the past. Matter of fact, some of US are beginning to be considered as "vintage"!?! :-) > Thanks for nothing, Lighten up, Lyle. Building an aircraft is going to require MUCH MUCH more patience than you have exhibited in your post. RV builders are a great resource as you progress along the path of putting your RV-6 in the air. Now is not the time to be burning bridges. Best regards, Sam Buchanan ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 18, 2003
From: Scott Bilinski <bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com>
Subject: Re: 4130 parts showing rust through primer
The way I understand it is most primers are not moisture/water proof. This is dated info though and the newer primers might be. Anyone know for sure? > >OK, I'll saddle up and be the first to bite! > >I'm stopping by Loeb Electric tonight after work to pick up my new >infrared heater so that I can start priming the stack of parts that's >accumulated on my bench over the last week. Before I do that, can you >expound a little on the problems you've seen with 4130 parts showing >rust through the primer? > >I'd sure hate to have the same problem, and if I'm using the primer in >question I may reconsider or redouble my efforts at getting as >near-perfect a surface before priming. > >TIA, Phil >Getting sassified with a little work on the tail (I can spell that >better than empennage :-) > >> Will probably post some .jpg's of the 4130 parts that are >> showing rust through one of the most frequently mentioned primers. > > Scott Bilinski Eng dept 305 Phone (858) 657-2536 Pager (858) 502-5190 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: Safety Concerns
Date: Nov 18, 2003
Your Lycoming is "hard" timed. It doesn't vary. That is why there are schemes to retard the fixed timing for starting... Impulses and show of sparks. Once running the stock mag doesn't change its timing. So static timing works very well for your engine. No need for a dynamic timing light. Now if you put on an electronic ignition, then and only then you might need a timing light. But even these are timed from a fixed point. With your car, they are load and rpm dependent so the need for dynamic timing. I would save my money for something else. Cy Galley, TC - Chair, Emergency Aircraft Repair, Oshkosh Editor, EAA Safety Programs cgalley(at)qcbc.org or experimenter(at)eaa.org Always looking for articles for the Experimenter ----- Original Message ----- From: "John" <n1cxo320(at)salidaco.com> Subject: RV-List: Safety Concerns > > I have always timed my Lycoming with the #1 cylinder at TDC and the timing > mark aligned with the case halves. This has worked for a long time. > > I now want to get more technical and have purchased a fancy digital timing > light that has a LCD screen with direct read out. > > My concern is: How to use the light on a running engine...I have an RV6A and > would have to be up on a step stool behind the prop in order to see what's > going on. The notion of slipping off the stool, or otherwise getting tangled > up in the prop has me, frankly, more than "concerned" -I can't see standing > in from of the prop with the engine going and using the light.... > > What do you techies do in such a situation? > > (And, yes, I have checked the archives first.) > > John > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Phil N" <pnewlon(at)toosan.com>
Subject: OT: Can I make this engine work in my -8 somehow?
Date: Nov 18, 2003
I don't think the battery in the tail will help much with the CG though. The wife might complain about the fuel burn, too. http://www.bath.ac.uk/~ccsshb/12cyl/ Phil ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: Remote control winch?
Date: Nov 18, 2003
I have made several winches using a coaster brake from a bike. One feature you should always use is a low voltage relay on the control cord. I used a heating pump relay that used 12 volts to control the 110 going to the motor. Then in bad weather or if you dropped the switch into a puddle, there would not be a shock hazard. The relay also eliminates the voltage drop from the long control cable and you can use very light cord for the control. If you really want to hold 110 AC in your hand, made sure that your winch is plugged into a Ground Fault Interrupter (GFI) These are cheap ($10) and work well. Cy Galley, TC - Chair, Emergency Aircraft Repair, Oshkosh Editor, EAA Safety Programs cgalley(at)qcbc.org or experimenter(at)eaa.org Always looking for articles for the Experimenter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charlie & Tupper England" <cengland(at)netdoor.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: Remote control winch? > > Dan DeNeal wrote: > > > > >I have a winch that was left in my hangar from the > >last person that had the hangar. I thought I would > >never need it to pull my RV6a into the hangar since > >the RV's are easy to push or pull. > > > >The end or March this past year we had some snow that > >blanketed the area leaving the taxiway in front of my > >hangar very slippery. When I realized I couldn't push > >the plane back into the hangar because of the ice, I > >grabbed the cable on the winch and hooked it to the > >RV. > >The winch saved the day!!! > > > >The winch is an old winch and uses an extension wire > >you have to unwind all the way to the front of the > >plane. Then you have to hold down the switch while the > >cable is winding up while your other hand is steering > >the front wheel. > > > >Where can I buy something like a garage door remote > >control that I could use to replace the extension > >wire. I'm looking for the remote and the receiver. I > >can find remotes but all the receivers seem to be > >attached to the garage door mechanisam. It just needs > >to start and stop. > > > >Dan DeNeal > >RV6A N256GD > >I love my plane!!! > > > > The requirement to hold the button might become a very important > damage-prevention feature. How about a switch you can hold in (activate > with) your teeth, wired in parallel to the retract button on your > current controller? It then becomes a 'dead man' switch if you drop it. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 18, 2003
From: Steven Eberhart <newtech(at)newtech.com>
Subject: Re: 4130 parts showing rust through primer
THe plane is an RV-8 that was delivered before Van's switched to powder coating the 4130 steel parts. We have had to clean up rust that was starting to show through the elevator and rudder brackets. It was like the primer was porous and didn't seal against moisture. The paint used was RM DP-40. THere seems to be a distinct difference between the RM DP primer and the PPG DP primer. I cleaned up the rust with a wire wheel on the Dremel and primed with NAPA rattle can self etching primer and then everything was primed with the same PPG DP-40LF that the entire plane was primed with. Color coats were PPG Concept. Steve Eberhart Finishing up the paint job on RV-8 N49KS and building RV-7A N14SE Phil N wrote: > > OK, I'll saddle up and be the first to bite! > > I'm stopping by Loeb Electric tonight after work to pick up my new > infrared heater so that I can start priming the stack of parts that's > accumulated on my bench over the last week. Before I do that, can you > expound a little on the problems you've seen with 4130 parts showing > rust through the primer? > > I'd sure hate to have the same problem, and if I'm using the primer in > question I may reconsider or redouble my efforts at getting as > near-perfect a surface before priming. > > TIA, Phil > Getting sassified with a little work on the tail (I can spell that > better than empennage :-) > > >>Will probably post some .jpg's of the 4130 parts that are >>showing rust through one of the most frequently mentioned primers. > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 18, 2003
From: linn walters <lwalters2(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: No subject as you will give it a new one shortly after
you flame me Sam Buchanan wrote: >Lighten up, Lyle. Building an aircraft is going to require MUCH MUCH >more patience than you have exhibited in your post. RV builders are a >great resource as you progress along the path of putting your RV-6 in >the air. Now is not the time to be burning bridges. > >Best regards, > >Sam Buchanan > Very true. Patience and a little thicker skin. From the posts, you've been around a long time. How long? Which RV? Linn (the instigator) Walters ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 18, 2003
From: linn walters <lwalters2(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: 4130 parts showing rust through primer
Steven Eberhart wrote: > >THe plane is an RV-8 that was delivered before Van's switched to powder >coating the 4130 steel parts. We have had to clean up rust that was >starting to show through the elevator and rudder brackets. It was like >the primer was porous and didn't seal against moisture. The paint used >was RM DP-40. THere seems to be a distinct difference between the RM DP >primer and the PPG DP primer. I cleaned up the rust with a wire wheel >on the Dremel and primed with NAPA rattle can self etching primer and >then everything was primed with the same PPG DP-40LF that the entire >plane was primed with. Color coats were PPG Concept. > >Steve Eberhart >Finishing up the paint job on RV-8 N49KS and building RV-7A N14SE > Well, I think I got it right. Preparation. Here's what I do, and it seems to work in the FL humidity. 1. Buy some Ospho from your local hardware store. 2. Let the steel get a little surface rust. Ospho works best when there isn't shiny steel. No, I don't know why. 3. Brush on the Ospho. If you HAVE to spray it, do so in well ventilated area and wear a RESPIRATOR. Not a paper mask. 4. Let it dry over a day or so. It will look real ugly with rough black crap all over it. Lightly sand off the ugly black crap. 5. Repeat step 3. 6. If you get more ugly black crap, do step 4. If not prime with paint of your choice. Ospho has acid in it (phosphoric, I think .... read the label. Well, read it anyway. It also has a dissoved plastic in it that will coat and seal the steel. the plastic is not durable so you must prime. Now, for what Steve's problem was. He's right. Primer is porous. It serves as a base to help make paint stick better. Paint doesn't stick to bare metal very well, and primer doesn't keep the moisture out. Together, however, they're a real good team. Steve didn't get the paint on soon enough. Been there, done that, and stripped it all off to start over. If you just try and kill the rust and paint over it though, it will come back later on. No, I'm not a paint expert, and don't play one on TV, but I've painted enough to know what has worked for me in the past. Ospho will also work on aluminum. I have test pieces 20 years old with good paint still on it. I also caution against mixing types of primer and paint. If you're going to use urethane paint, use urethane primer. Same with acrylic and the other flavors. Hope this helps! Linn Walters ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 18, 2003
From: "Richard V. Reynolds" <rvreynolds(at)macs.net>
Subject: Pressure (in H2O) versus Airspeed
I am trying to calibrate my airspeed meter with a water manometer. I know the relationship is approximately P=K*V N, where P = in-H2O, K = Constant, V = knots, N=exponent, 2. What is the "exact" formula for airpeed versus pressure (in-H2O) which includes air temperature? Richard Reynolds, Norfolk, VA, RV-6A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "rv6tc" <rv6tc(at)myawai.com>
Subject: Re: The natural progresion of lists - was Food Fight, etc.
Date: Nov 18, 2003
Steve, Well said. Now. Post those pictures..... I'm very interested in that. Keith Hughes RV-6 Finish Hoping I have the right primer! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven Eberhart" <newtech(at)newtech.com> > . When the RV lists settle down a > little I will discuss some of the problems I have found with some of the > "primer war" solutions that are in the archives. Will probably post > some .jpg's of the 4130 parts that are showing rust through one of the > most frequently mentioned primers. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jim Sears <sears(at)searnet.com>
Subject: Re: New anti-corrosion policy from Van's?
Date: Nov 18, 2003
Kevin's remarks below are news to me. If this is true, I feel it's appropriate to archive this piece of information for future reference. I'll sure peel plastic in the future! In fact, I'm going to forward this to my friend who just left us for the Yahoo group. :-) Jim Sears in KY > Just got started on my wing kit and found that I will have to buy a > complete set of wing skins before I get started due to corrosion. > > I've had both my emp & wing kit for a couple of years and haven't really > worked on the kits for a variety of reasons. Recently, I have gotten the > time and motivation to finish it. With emp done, I started on the wings > and had them ready for debur/dimple/priming when I started to peel the > plastic back to reveal what wasn't so apparent through the plastic. A > corrosion nightmare! > > Yeah, I had the kit for a couple of years, but it was stored in a dry > space and the emp kit sat just as long with no corrosion at all (plastic > still on!). After soliciting opinions/suggestions from several builders > in my chapter (EAA 326 - great chapter!!), I had the local FAA guy (also > a chapter member) come by and render the final fatal verdict. After a > close inspection, it appears that the plastic coating may have been > applied when the wing skins were damp since the corrosion is not only on > the edge, but everywhere. > > I called Van's today to beg for mercy and it was decided that I would > bring back the skins for their review and hopeful exchange (does not > appear likely). They did make a interesting comment that I suspect that > none of you have ever heard from them and the reason I am risking > getting flamed from our resident flamer(s). That is, why didn't I remove > the plastic "immediately" after receiving/inventoring the kit? Well, > that was news to me. Certainly I knew not to store in a wet/damp > environment, but it hadn't occurred to me that a dry environment was > just as bad. > > So builders beware, I guess the new Van's policy when receiving your > kit is to inventory and IMMEDIATELY remove ALL plastic coatings from > surfaces. While your admiring the pretty blue plastic after you've > carefully/skillfully/patiently removed the plastic where you'll be > riveting; leaving the remainder thinking you are protecting the surface > from scratches, it's corroding away leaving only the scratches from the > area that you DID peel the plastics! > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 18, 2003
From: Scott Bilinski <bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com>
Subject: Re: Pressure (in H2O) versus Airspeed
How do you tweak the ASI once you find it is off? > >I am trying to calibrate my airspeed meter with a water manometer. > >I know the relationship is approximately P=K*V >N, > >where P = in-H2O, K = Constant, V = knots, N=exponent, 2. > >What is the "exact" formula for airpeed versus pressure (in-H2O) which >includes air temperature? > >Richard Reynolds, Norfolk, VA, RV-6A > > Scott Bilinski Eng dept 305 Phone (858) 657-2536 Pager (858) 502-5190 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Pressure (in H2O) versus Airspeed
Date: Nov 18, 2003
Check the archives...one of the manufacturers of one of those all-in one flight display systems has instructions in it for making your own...it has the numbers in it. Don't remember which one- but I did print it off at home...I'll try to remember and scan it in.... Ralph Capen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard V. Reynolds" <rvreynolds(at)macs.net> Subject: RV-List: Pressure (in H2O) versus Airspeed > > I am trying to calibrate my airspeed meter with a water manometer. > > I know the relationship is approximately P=K*V > N, > > where P = in-H2O, K = Constant, V = knots, N=exponent, 2. > > What is the "exact" formula for airpeed versus pressure (in-H2O) which > includes air temperature? > > Richard Reynolds, Norfolk, VA, RV-6A > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Elsa & Henry" <elsa-henry@darlor-watch.com>
Subject: Re: New anti-corrosion policy from Van's?
Date: Nov 18, 2003
Kevin, That's unbelievable!! What the H**l is Alcad coating supposed to DO!? It sounds to me you got a bad batch of aluminum! I bought the entire kit at one time and peeled off the plastic in strips to allow riveting and peeled off the rest prior to priming and painting after 5 years and this was the white stuff that was hard to get off. The aluminum was pristine under the plastic!---Don't understand it! Cheers!!----Henry Hore ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 18, 2003
From: Kevin Horton <khorton01(at)rogers.com>
Subject: Re: Pressure (in H2O) versus Airspeed
> >How do you tweak the ASI once you find it is off? > >> >>I am trying to calibrate my airspeed meter with a water manometer. >> >>I know the relationship is approximately P=K*V >>N, >> >>where P = in-H2O, K = Constant, V = knots, N=exponent, 2. >> >>What is the "exact" formula for airpeed versus pressure (in-H2O) which > >includes air temperature? >> For the original poster, you can find the info you need at: http://members.rogers.com/khorton/rvlinks/asi.zip This unzips to become an Excel spreadsheet that will convert back and forth between ASI readings and water manometer readings. Contact me for assistance if you have any problems with it. For Scott: If the ASI has a big error, you send it back to the vendor, or throw it away. I've heard one report of an ASI that was over 10 mph in error. If the ASI has a small, but acceptable error, you live with it. Knowledge of the ASI error is a critical part of the process used to determine the position error in the static system, assuming you use one of the techniques that compares IAS against GPS based TAS. If you are going to fly IFR, it is probably smart to figure out how much static system error you have, as that translates into an error in the indicated altitude. It is also worthwhile making sure you don't have too big an error even if you only fly VFR, as TCAS equipped aircraft use the altitude from your transponder to determine whether to climb or dive as they approach you. If you've got an error in your static system that will affect the transponder too. And no, the transponder checks done by the avionics shop don't tell you anything about position error, as position error is due to the difference between the true ambient pressure and the pressure at the static port. That error will be zero in the hangar with the doors closed. There is lots more info on this subject on my web site: http://members.rogers.com/khorton/rvlinks/ssec.html http://go.phpwebhosting.com/~khorton/rv8/phplinks/index.php?&PID=47 -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (finishing kit) Ottawa, Canada http://go.phpwebhosting.com/~khorton/rv8/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 18, 2003
From: Paul Eastham <eastham(at)netapp.com>
Subject: spar tabs
Anyone have any advice for how to keep the little tabs on the ribs that fit inside the spar in alignment and sitting down flat? These are the tabs that will be riveted through the skin. (This is on a RV-9 HS but I think I've seen these tabs elsewhere in the various kits) I can usually bring them into alignment by pushing and prodding them, and can definitely get a cleco in, but I can't maintain this pressure and get a bucking bar in there at the same time. Bend them permanently, you say? Well, some are already riveted to the spar, the others...it's as if they are bent for a spar that was a little wider than mine. Flattening out the existing bend then rebending it seems pretty stressful on the metal to me. Still struggling with aligning this !#$!#@ HS skin. It is just way too tight. Problems on the main ribs too...my VS and rudder are going together fine so I don't think it's total incompetence on my part :) Paul http://hmb.dyndns.org/~eastham/rv PS regarding smoothness of skin rivets: a few are a little rougher on one side than the other, clearly they are not sitting perfectly flat. Acceptable to leave the rivet in place? Good task for a rivet shaver? (I know they are tricky to use, lots of mixed opinions in the archives) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 18, 2003
From: N13eer(at)aol.com
Subject: Traveling to Alabama
I'm planning a trip to Enterprise Alabama to visit my brother-in-law over Thanksgiving. I plan on heading down on Saturday and staying about a week depending on weather. Anyone got any advice on leaving a my -8 at the enterprise airport, or an empty hanger there? I have not had a chance to call the FBO but plan to do that tomorrow. Anyone have any must see sight while I'm in LA (lower Alabama) Thanks Alan Kritzman RV-8 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Greg Young" <gyoung@cs-sol.com>
Subject: First flight decisions
Date: Nov 18, 2003
Skill and confidence are certainly major factors in how the first flight gets conducted and by whom. I don't mean to trivialize it but if all goes well, as it normally does, it boils down to a bragging rights issue. What doesn't get enough discussion is consideration of the ugly consequences of bad and worst case scenarios, i.e. if the airplane gets bent/destroyed and/or the pilot hurt/killed. The normal discussion is limited to "be prepared to sacrifice the airplane" and "land straight ahead..." I was and did and it worked out partly because of some other, unconscious, but nonetheless right for me, decisions. I was shocked afterward by how many people told me how devastated they would be to lose their aircraft and those that would be unable to rebuild because of finances or other reasons. It made me realize that others might follow branches of the decision tree that I never touched. I always planned to make the first flight and I prepared for it, so I never considered the what-ifs of someone else flying my airplane. But maybe we all should. Will you blame or second guess yourself if you break the airplane? Can you handle someone else breaking your airplane? Would it be good to have a scapegoat if something goes wrong;-)? If you pay someone to test fly it and they get killed, can you rationalize it as a risk of his job? Can you live with it if it's a good friend doing it as a favor? Is your family better off if it's not you hurt or killed? I had full first flight insurance and am otherwise covered but not everyone is. Can you afford to fix or rebuild the airplane? Can your family afford the medical bills if you are injured or your loss if killed? Can you afford to be off work during your recovery? What if you don't fully recover? Can you afford the legal fallout if someone else flys and is hurt or killed? Will your spouse let you rebuild if you get hurt vs. a test pilot? Will you care? There are many more questions and no right or wrong, better or worse answers. I pruned much of the decision tree without realizing it and we all make some of these choices in our normal flying. But first flight and the test period is a different level of risk warranting a fresh look. Do some soul searching on the emotional and financial consequences to you and your family if things don't go well. You may be surprised what you discover. Regards, Greg Young - Houston (DWH) RV-6 N6GY ...project Phoenix Navion N5221K - just an XXL RV-6A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Vince Himsl" <vhimsl(at)turbonet.com>
Subject: RE: Safe travels, Glenn
Date: Nov 18, 2003
I care! And take care! Vince Himsl RV8-SB Moscow, ID ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6AOKC(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 18, 2003
Subject: Re: RE: Safe travels, Glenn
Be Safe Glenn and come back soon..... Best Wishes, Kurt Klewin, RV6A, OKC, OK Maj, USAFR, (Returned from Iraqi Freedom Deployment last May) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 18, 2003
From: RV6160hp(at)aol.com
Subject: Re: EAA Young Eagles paranoid concern....
I believe you will find the EAA minimum level is $100,000 of liability the pilot must have on himself before the EAA young Eagles policy kicks in for the Million I believe. Just being a member of EAA and filling out the forms - flying young eagles doesn't mean you are covered. FOrms must be filled out and signed before YE flight, pilot must be legal, current and BFR'd and so on....As well the local EAA chapter must have filled out the insurance coverage request from stating YE rides are to be given at that event too ... well in advance before it is a covered... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Glen Matejcek" <aerobubba(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Remote control winch?
Date: Nov 18, 2003
We've got a remote light switch that I believe we bought at Sears. It mounts in place of our orig stoop light switch and is controlled by the garage door opener remote. Sounds like it could be adapted to your needs pretty easily. Glen Matejcek aerobubba(at)earthlink.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Carter" <dcarter(at)datarecall.net>
Subject: Re: Pressure (in
H2O) versus Airspeed
Date: Nov 18, 2003
Rich, I've saved several e-mails w/info on manometers for pitot sys calibration. Since I don't think we can post attachments to the RV-list (please correct me if I'm wrong), I'll imbed them below - making this a long e-mail. These 4 e-mails include altimeter cal as well as airspeed. David Carter - - - - - - - - - - start of cut & paste e-mails E-mail #1 of 4: a test pilot, adds info after the table and explanation below) > >17.4/20 0.20 >26/30 0.44 >34.8/40 0.79 >43.5/50 1.23 >50/57.5 1.63 >69.6/80 3.16 >70/80 3.20 >86.9/100 4.94 >100/115 6.56 >104.3/120 7.13 >110/126.5 7.95 >120/138 9.48 >130/149.5 11.14 >130/150 11.18 >150/172.5 14.87 >173.9/200 20.04 >200/230 26.71 >217.4/250 31.63 > >First column is the airspeed in knots/MPH, second column is inches of >water. Very simple accurate manometer made with 4 feet if 1/4 inch clear >tubing from the hardware store and a yard stick and a wire tie. Wire tie >the tubing onto the yardstick in the form of a long, skinny "u" shape, >connect one end to the pitot tube and dribble water in the other end of >the "u" to calibrate AS indicator in your airplane. Leaks indicate >static or pitot connection leaks somewhere in your system, or AS >indicator problems. Don't allow water to enter the pitot tube. The >meniscus or "water level" or air-to-water lines indicate the pressure >differences as applied to the water coulomb in the poly tubing. The >length of differences between the two lines is what you are measuring >(as indicated in the second coulomb in the above table) > > >I've missed this handy table over the years and all the references at my >house don't have this table. I found this at the Rocky Mt. site, as >indicated by Jim Anders today.(A bunch of my friends don't have hi speed >internet or DSL to download the PDF file, or browsers that allow >external links. This ASCII version will be view able to all and also >reside in the archives. > Kevin added: I cranked up an Excel 4 spreadsheet that converts between height of the water column and the airspeed indicator reading. It will work in mph, kts or km/hr. The zipped spreadsheet file is at: http://members.rogers.com/khorton/rvlinks/asi.zip A lot of other good stuff can be found from my Flight Test Links page: http://members.rogers.com/khorton/ftlinks.html -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (fibreglas, yuck) Ottawa, Canada http://members.rogers.com/khorton/rv8.html - - - - - - - - - - - - E-mail #2 of 4: Jim and all, Thanks for the long post and all the new data. Your right about us as a community needing to relate our own experiences for the benefit of all so something like this won't be repeated. When I did the first flight on my plane last August I relayed the fact that my airspeed gage was 20 mph off on my first flight. In retrospect this was pretty irresponsible of me not to have checked this out before I flew. Since I have a Rocky Mtn Instruments Micro Encoder, all I had to do was go to the calibration section of the manual to find out how to build a simple manometer to check out the pitot system myself. The whole experience took me about 30 minutes to construct the tool ( a simple clear tubing and yard stick affair ) that only cost me about $10. Using the chart in the back of the manual you can tell down to about a mph where you are with regard to calibration. I have two airspeed indicators in my panel so I can verify one against the other. You can also use this system to determine if you have a leak. The manual for the encoder is on the Rocky Mountain site ( http://www.rkymtn.com/ ) for anyone to download. In encourage everyone to do this and construct this tool long before your first flight to insure that what happened to Scott doesn't happen to you. - Jim Andrews RV-8A ( out of the paint shop this weekend... Yippeeeeee ) rv8a.tripod.com - - - - - - - - - - end of e-mail #2 - - - - - - - E-mail #3 of 4: From another e-mail, here is the website for all the above plus vastly more detail on calibaration of pitot-static system: http://www.eaa1000.av.org/technicl/instcal/instcal.htm I just clicked it and it still works. I would go there, then File, Save it as a document on your hard drive so it won't be lost someday. - - - - - - - - - - E-mail # 4 of 4 - Altimeter calibration (not what you asked for, Rich, but save it.): ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Horton" <khorto1537(at)rogers.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: Altimeter calibration Formulae from Aviation Formulary, by Ed Williams: http://williams.best.vwh.net/avform.htm At sea-level on a standard day: the pressure, P_0 = 29.92126 "Hg = 1013.250 mB = 2116.2166 lbs/ft 2 = 760.0 mmHg = 101325.0 Pa = 14.69595 psi = 1.0 atm Variation of pressure with altitude: p= P_0*(1-6.8755856*10 -6 h) 5.2558797 h<36,089.24ft So, I cranked up a quick spreadsheet and got Variation of pressure with altitude: ft in H20 in hg mm hg mb psi 0 407.1 29.92126 760 1013.25 14.69595 1000 392.6 28.86 732.9 977.2 14.17 2000 378.5 27.82 706.7 942.1 13.66 3000 364.9 26.82 681.1 908.1 13.17 4000 351.6 25.84 656.4 875.1 12.69 5000 338.7 24.9 632.4 843.1 12.23 6000 326.2 23.98 609.0 812.0 11.78 7000 314.1 23.09 586.4 781.9 11.34 8000 302.4 22.22 564.5 752.6 10.92 9000 291.0 21.39 543.3 724.3 10.5 10000 280.0 20.58 522.7 696.8 10.11 But, I think this will be a difficult thing to measure unless you can find some specialized (read expensive) equipment. Kevin Horton RV-8 (spinner, cowling) Ottawa, Canada http://members.rogers.com/khorton/rv8.html Or you could just get out your AC 43.13-1A It has a table in inches of water for a water manometer and it is accurate and simple. New version unfortunately does NOT have the table nor instructions. - - - - - - - - - - - end of quoted e-mails on the topic. David Carter ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Cimino" <jcimino(at)echoes.net>
Subject: RV-Pilot Bed & Breakfast?
Date: Nov 18, 2003
There used to be an organization out there called the "Pilot's Bed & Breakfast", which if you were a member, you agreed to have traveling pilots stay at your home when they passed through town. I spent some time with these members and their families on some long trips in the early 90's and really enjoyed it. Has anyone though of organizing such a group for our fellow RV Pilots? We all love our RV's and we love to share them with others as well as talk about them. The thing that made the original organization great was that you had something in common with people all over the country and you could spend time with and meet people who you had already something in common. I think us RV drivers have a lot in common and I always enjoy meeting new people. I stayed with individuals from St. Louis to Los Angeles and really had a great time, and saved some money too. The only expense in the organization was for a yearly catalog which listed members contact information. With the web, I think this could easily be done without any expense. Anyone interested? James Cimino RV-8 SN 80039 100+ Hours 570-842-4057 http://www.geocities.com/jcimino.geo/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Sipp" <rsipp(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: The natural progresion of lists - was Food Fight, etc.
Date: Nov 18, 2003
I think Steve Eberhart is right on with his comments. I for one am very glad that after 20 some odd years of building kits the same way, Van listened when some young engineer said there is a better way with CAD/CNC technology. The 10 kit and documentation show what new ideas can produce. The kit is an absolute pleasure to assemble. Dick Sipp RV4 N250DS RV10 N110DV ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 18, 2003
From: Charlie & Tupper England <cengland(at)netdoor.com>
Subject: Re: RV-Pilot Bed & Breakfast?
Jim Cimino wrote: > >There used to be an organization out there called the "Pilot's Bed & Breakfast", which if you were a member, you agreed to have traveling pilots stay at your home when they passed through town. I spent some time with these members and their families on some long trips in the early 90's and really enjoyed it. Has anyone though of organizing such a group for our fellow RV Pilots? We all love our RV's and we love to share them with others as well as talk about them. The thing that made the original organization great was that you had something in common with people all over the country and you could spend time with and meet people who you had already something in common. I think us RV drivers have a lot in common and I always enjoy meeting new people. I stayed with individuals from St. Louis to Los Angeles and really had a great time, and saved some money too. The only expense in the organization was for a yearly catalog which listed members contact information. With th! >e web, I think this could easily be done without any expense. >Anyone interested? > >James Cimino >RV-8 SN 80039 >100+ Hours >570-842-4057 >http://www.geocities.com/jcimino.geo/ > try: http://www.vansairforce.net/rvtravelpages.htm or http://www.vansairforce.net/ & scroll down to RV Hotel. If you are passing through Mississippi, give us a call. Charlie ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 18, 2003
From: "thomas a. sargent" <sarg314(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: tip-up rear window fit
I have the rear window on my RV-6A tip-up close to its final size, but not yet drilled to the F-674 skin or the roll bar. When I clamp it in place I notice that it lays flat along the top of the roll bar, but along the sides of the roll bar, there is about 1/16" gap between the forward edge of the plexi and the surface of the roll bar. There the plexi contacts the roll bar only at its aft edge. When you think of the geometry of the situation, it seems to me that this is inescapable. The roll bar is built square, that is, the part that the plexi lays on is perpendicular to the bar's forward and aft faces. But the plexi tapers towards the back the same way the fuselage does. Since the roll bar is slanted back, its top edge is tilted at an angle that matches the angle of the plexi, but the tilt does almost nothing to change the angle that the sides make to the plexi. I never noticed noticed this gap on other planes before, but it seems like it's designed in. I guess one solution would be to cut the forward edge of the window back further. Right now it is trimmed to put its forward edge 3/8" back from the forward face of the roll bar - as the plan require. Have other people seen the same effect? How have you dealt with it? -- Tom Sargent RV-6A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Joe Hine" <joehine(at)rogers.com>
Subject: RV-Pilot Bed & Breakfast?
Date: Nov 19, 2003
Jim Doug Reeves has such a thing on his web site, he doesn't promote it too much but it is there with a list of Rvers who are willing to put up others. His site is http://www.vansairforce.net/ select RV hotel from the menu on the left. Joe Hine RV4 C-FYTQ -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Jim Cimino Subject: RV-List: RV-Pilot Bed & Breakfast? There used to be an organization out there called the "Pilot's Bed & Breakfast", which if you were a member, you agreed to have traveling pilots stay at your home when they passed through town. I spent some time with these members and their families on some long trips in the early 90's and really enjoyed it. Has anyone though of organizing such a group for our fellow RV Pilots? We all love our RV's and we love to share them with others as well as talk about them. The thing that made the original organization great was that you had something in common with people all over the country and you could spend time with and meet people who you had already something in common. I think us RV drivers have a lot in common and I always enjoy meeting new people. I stayed with individuals from St. Louis to Los Angeles and really had a great time, and saved some money too. The only expense in the organization was for a yearly catalog which listed members contact information. With th! e web, I think this could easily be done without any expense. Anyone interested? James Cimino RV-8 SN 80039 100+ Hours 570-842-4057 http://www.geocities.com/jcimino.geo/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Pardue" <n5lp(at)warpdriveonline.com>
Subject: Re: RV-Pilot Bed & Breakfast?
Date: Nov 18, 2003
High time you got acquainted with Doug Reeves. http://65.219.228.161/rvtravelpages.htm Larry Pardue Carlsbad, NM RV-6 N441LP Flying http://n5lp.net > > There used to be an organization out there called the "Pilot's Bed & Breakfast", which if you were a member, you agreed to have traveling pilots stay at your home when they passed through town. I spent some time with these members and their families on some long trips in the early 90's and really enjoyed it. Has anyone though of organizing such a group for our fellow RV Pilots? We all love our RV's and we love to share them with others as well as talk about them. The thing that made the original organization great was that you had something in common with people all over the country and you could spend time with and meet people who you had already something in common. I think us RV drivers have a lot in common and I always enjoy meeting new people. I stayed with individuals from St. Louis to Los Angeles and really had a great time, and saved some money too. The only expense in the organization was for a yearly catalog which listed members contact information. With th! > e web, I think this could easily be done without any expense. > Anyone interested? > > James Cimino > RV-8 SN 80039 > 100+ Hours > 570-842-4057 > http://www.geocities.com/jcimino.geo/ > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Michael D. Crowe" <tripacer(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: RV10 Tail kit Atlanta area?
Date: Nov 18, 2003
Does anyone in the Atlanta GA area have an RV10 tail kit I could come look at? Thank You Mike Crowe RV8A wings ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Wright brothers
Date: Nov 18, 2003
From: "David.vonLinsowe" <David.vonLinsowe(at)delphi.com>
Hi guys, I'm looking for a RV friendly airport in the vicinity of the Wright reenactment December 17th. If the weather cooperates I would rather take the RV instead of an airliner. It takes 6 1/2 hours travel time by airliner, not counting the extra time you need to be there early, and 3 1/2 hours air time by RV from Michigan. I already have tickets, ground transportation and hotel. Thanks, Dave RV-6 **************************************************************************************** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and thus protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. **************************************************************************************** ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
Subject: Remote control winch
From: j1j2h3(at)juno.com
Electrical departments in places like Home Depot sell remote control light switches. I think one of these would do the job for you. I used one once to replace a lost remote for my garage door opener. Jim Hasper - RV-7 just starting empennage (setting up shop in Franklin, Tennessee) (snip) >Where can I buy something like a garage door remote >control that I could use to replace the extension wire. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: "Richard V. Reynolds" <rvreynolds(at)macs.net>
Subject: Re: Wright brothers
In the Norfolrk, VA area, try: SFQ Suffolk, VA PVG Hampton Roads Exec (listed under Norfolk in the A/FD) CPK Cheaapeake Regional (listed under Norfolk in the A/FD) Due to hurricane Isabel, hangar space is limited as is marina space. Richard Reynolds, Norfolk, VA, RV-6A "David.vonLinsowe" wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I'm looking for a RV friendly airport in the vicinity of the Wright reenactment December 17th. If the weather cooperates I would rather take the RV instead of an airliner. It takes 6 1/2 hours travel time by airliner, not counting the extra time you need to be there early, and 3 1/2 hours air time by RV from Michigan. I already have tickets, ground transportation and hotel. > > Thanks, > > Dave > RV-6 > > **************************************************************************************** > > Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and thus protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. > > **************************************************************************************** > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom & Cathy Ervin" <tcervin(at)valkyrie.net>
Subject: Engine Plenum
Date: Nov 19, 2003
List, Getting ready to fabricate the engine baffles on my RV6-A with an 0-360A1A and was wondering if anybody who has went the route of a sealed Aluminum Plenum can give any feedback? 1) Would you do it again? 2) Notice better cooling? 3) Increased speed? Don Eaves had some great pictures on the List Photo Share but very little info in the archives. Tom in Ohio Cowling and paint ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Eaves" <doneaves(at)midsouth.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Engine Plenum
Date: Nov 19, 2003
Hello Tom - I've been flying My 6 for over 200 hours: Would I do it again? YES Cooling has never been a problem - Many "Non-Plenum" RV's have reported cooling problems. Increased Speed: In the spirit of Van - I have nothing to compare it to, so I cannot say if it is faster. If you have anymore questions just email me - If you would like to call me , email me (offline) your number and I will be glad to. Don Eaves doneaves(at)midsouth.rr.com RV 6 Flying 200 + Hrs. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom & Cathy Ervin" <tcervin(at)valkyrie.net> Subject: RV-List: Engine Plenum > > List, Getting ready to fabricate the engine baffles on my RV6-A with an 0-360A1A and was wondering if anybody who has went the route of a sealed Aluminum Plenum can give any feedback? > 1) Would you do it again? > 2) Notice better cooling? > 3) Increased speed? > Don Eaves had some great pictures on the List Photo Share but very little info in the archives. > Tom in Ohio > Cowling and paint > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dean" <dvanwinkle(at)royell.net>
Subject: Re: Traveling to Alabama
Date: Nov 18, 2003
Alan You might want to check out the Army Aviation Museum at Ft. Rucker which is only about 5 miles or so from Enterprise. I haven't been there since the new one opened, but understand that it is very good. Dean RV-9A Fuselage/Finish ----- Original Message ----- From: <N13eer(at)aol.com> Subject: RV-List: Traveling to Alabama > > I'm planning a trip to Enterprise Alabama to visit my brother-in-law over Thanksgiving. I plan on heading down on Saturday and staying about a week depending on weather. Anyone got any advice on leaving a my -8 at the enterprise airport, or an empty hanger there? I have not had a chance to call the FBO but plan to do that tomorrow. Anyone have any must see sight while I'm in LA (lower Alabama) > > Thanks > Alan Kritzman > RV-8 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: Scott Bilinski <bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com>
Subject: Re: Engine Plenum
I know 3 people who have gone the plenum route, and from what little info I have my impression is they are no better than the standard style baffling.........IF, you do a very good job on the baffling that is. My 8 and another 8 just flew for the first time this month I have standard baffles and he has the alum plenum. His head temps are 10~15 degrees hotter. I have dual electronic ign which should make my head temps 10~15 degrees hotter than his but they are lower. I spent a lot of time on my baffles sealing up everything. Where the baffles seal against the cowl I did this in 3 pieces and pre curved them to fit the cowl. I spent days getting this just right, but I am sure glad I did. > >List, Getting ready to fabricate the engine baffles on my RV6-A with an >0-360A1A and was wondering if anybody who has went the route of a sealed >Aluminum Plenum can give any feedback? > 1) Would you do it again? > 2) Notice better cooling? > 3) Increased speed? > Don Eaves had some great pictures on the List Photo Share but very >little info in the archives. > > Tom in Ohio > > Cowling and >paint > > Scott Bilinski Eng dept 305 Phone (858) 657-2536 Pager (858) 502-5190 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: Dan DeNeal <rv6apilot(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: IFR schools?
Their are 3 guys at our airport (DNV) that is looking to upgrade our tickets for VFR to IFR. What we are looking for is a concentrated course where you can spend a week and get your IFR rating. I remember seeing something like this but can't locate anybody that does it. Dan DeNeal RV6A - N256GD (130 hrs) __________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: linn walters <lwalters2(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: response to military question
glenn.williams(at)businessacft.bombardier.com wrote: > > >Listers I know this is off subject but someone asked and here is my >response. > > That's OK, mine is too! This is for Glenn and all the other military guys that are keeping us safe and sound. Speaking of sound, turn up those speakers!!! Makes me proud!!! Linn Watch this closely. It's so cool what the sea creatures end up doing. Please be patient as this takes about 1 minute to load...but it's worth it. Enjoy! (Be sure the sound is on.) http://www.jacquielawson.com/viewcard.asp?code=1483260750 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Greg Young" <gyoung@cs-sol.com>
Subject: First flight decisions
Date: Nov 19, 2003
> > Greg, I like your post. I also like the 'me' or 'him' > dilemma. I flew Thanks Linn. It's a dilema best sorted out ahead of time. > >if all goes well, as it normally does, it boils down to a > >bragging rights issue. > > > I agree to a point. For me it was more personal accomplishment than > anything else. And, I didn't know any other Pitts pilots! OK, bragging rights is too cavalier but it's still personal pride. It was for me too. Nothing wrong with that if it doesn't override other factors. > I looked up the NTSB report on your accident, but, of course, it says > the engine quit for unknown reasons. Do you have any theories? I My working theory is vapor lock precipitated by a rich mixture. In the next few weeks I plan to send the engine to Aerosport for teardown and rebuild. At OSH Bart said the teardown and test run should detect any problem. He also said he's seen other AFP servos that were too rich. Others saw black smoke on my startups but never mentioned it. I wish they had - never assume anything unusual you see has already been noted. > >it as a favor? Is your family better off if it's not you hurt or > >killed? > > > In today's litigous society, this is a very real problem. I would > rather leave a widow than make one. I'm sure most of us would sacrifice ourselves when faced with the hypothetical schoolyard full of kids but in this context it can be perfectly OK to let someone less risk adverse take the risk. Remember it's risk not certainty. If you really anticipate a problem, no one should fly it until resolved. > >I had full first flight insurance and am otherwise covered but not > >everyone is. > > > How much did that cost? Where did you get the coverage, abd > how did you > arrive at the coverage amount? I didn't know it existed. It's readily available for RVs, try Nationair or others. In my case I had builders insurance for several years along with the full coverage on my Citabria from AIG. About a year before I flew, I got an unsolicited rider saying I had first flight coverage on the RV. When I switched the RV to full coverage I set the amount based on replacement cost. Policies are "agreed value" so you don't want to set it lower than you're willing to sell it to the insurance company. > I think we all care. Was the medical expenses covered in the first > flight insurance, or was that a separate policy? Insurance > from work??? The bulk of the medical expense was paid by my regular health insurance. The aircraft policy had $2K for medical which just about covered my deductible and out of pocket. I own my own business so the time off was a non-issue. > IMHO, Greg made one mistake that got him caught. The > narrative said he > was returning to the airport when the engine quit. On my > initial flight > I climbed up to 3000' over my airport (the ceiling of class D at that > time) and never was very far from safe haven. As the hours > built up, I > flew farther .... but always with a lot of altitude. Even in hindsight I don't consider leaving the airport area a mistake. It was a conscious, reasoned choice. My field is tower controlled under a 2000' Class B floor and is surrounded by houses and trees. Open fields and higher floors start about 2-3 miles west of the field. That gave me unlimited forced landing sites and much more latitude (and altitude) to explore the airplane. I had a fresh O/H that needed to run WOT. Getting away made me more comfortable but others may choose differently or may still consider it a mistake. That's OK. The true bad choice was not climbing at the first indication of a mixture problem. I chose to carry extra speed but stay at pattern altitude. Altitude would have given me more options. Always climb at any hint of a problem. > Thanks for giving us something to dwell on while our 'first > flight' is > in the future!!! > Linn Walters If anyone gleans something from my experience it helps mitigate the loss. Of course not all lessons stick with us as they should as evidenced by the recently drilled #30 hole in my index finger. At least I've learned not to countersink it;-) Take care, Greg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: Gary Zilik <zilik(at)direcpc.com>
Subject: Re: Engine Plenum
Tom & Cathy Ervin wrote: > >List, Getting ready to fabricate the engine baffles on my RV6-A with an 0-360A1A and was wondering if anybody who has went the route of a sealed Aluminum Plenum can give any feedback? > 1) Would you do it again? > no > 2) Notice better cooling? > no > 3) Increased speed? > no Gary Zilik RV-6A ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: Hal Rozema <hartist1(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Remote control winch?
Home Depot Wireless Switch... electrical department Dan DeNeal wrote: > > I have a winch that was left in my hangar from the > last person that had the hangar. I thought I would > never need it to pull my RV6a into the hangar since > the RV's are easy to push or pull. > > The end or March this past year we had some snow that > blanketed the area leaving the taxiway in front of my > hangar very slippery. When I realized I couldn't push > the plane back into the hangar because of the ice, I > grabbed the cable on the winch and hooked it to the > RV. > The winch saved the day!!! > > The winch is an old winch and uses an extension wire > you have to unwind all the way to the front of the > plane. Then you have to hold down the switch while the > cable is winding up while your other hand is steering > the front wheel. > > Where can I buy something like a garage door remote > control that I could use to replace the extension > wire. I'm looking for the remote and the receiver. I > can find remotes but all the receivers seem to be > attached to the garage door mechanisam. It just needs > to start and stop. > > Dan DeNeal > RV6A N256GD > I love my plane!!! > > __________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "C. Rabaut" <crabaut(at)coalinga.com>
Subject: Re: First flight decisions
Date: Nov 19, 2003
Greg, Thank you VERY much for this (& all your previous posts). You may've in deed already saved someone else. BTW, I'm sure you didnot forget to deburr & prime that hole. :-} Chuck ----- Original Message ----- From: Greg Young <gyoung@cs-sol.com> > If anyone gleans something from my experience it helps mitigate the > loss. Of course not all lessons stick with us as they should as > evidenced by the recently drilled #30 hole in my index finger. At least > I've learned not to countersink it;-) > > Take care, > Greg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: rob ray <smokyray(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Wright brothers
Manteo, NC is the nicest and closest if you don't have reservations for FF airport. Go to Airnav.com for more info and cheap gas closeby. RR "David.vonLinsowe" wrote: Hi guys, I'm looking for a RV friendly airport in the vicinity of the Wright reenactment December 17th. If the weather cooperates I would rather take the RV instead of an airliner. It takes 6 1/2 hours travel time by airliner, not counting the extra time you need to be there early, and 3 1/2 hours air time by RV from Michigan. I already have tickets, ground transportation and hotel. Thanks, Dave RV-6 **************************************************************************************** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and thus protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. **************************************************************************************** --------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Rozendaal" <dougr(at)petroblend.com>
Subject: Re: IFR schools?
Date: Nov 19, 2003
Their is one in Albert Lea MN Called MN Aviation. They also have operations in other MN towns, they do a pretty good job. That is not too far from Danville. For 3 guys they might come to you. http://www.private2atp.com/details/1629.html The owner is Mike Nesbitt, he is a good guy, tell him I sent you. Tailwinds, Doug Rozendaal > > Their are 3 guys at our airport (DNV) that is looking > to upgrade our tickets for VFR to IFR. What we are > looking for is a concentrated course where you can > spend a week and get your IFR rating. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Doug Rozendaal" <dougr(at)petroblend.com>
Subject: Re: IFR schools?
Date: Nov 19, 2003
This is a better link to MN Aviation http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/roedder_gmbh/mike1.htm Doug Rozendaal ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Joe & Jan Connell" <jconnell(at)rconnect.com>
Subject: Evaluation of ICOM IC-A200 Transceiver
Date: Nov 19, 2003
Gentlemen (and ladies too), I had decided to install a UPS SL40 in my VFR RV-9A until the recent Garmin buyout. I'm now contemplating an ICOM IC-A200 instead. In reviewing the archives, I'm found only 4 postings. Do any of you have experience and comments about this radio? Thanks, Joe Connell RV-9A N95JJ (finishing kit stage) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: LeastDrag93066(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 19, 2003
Subject: Re: Engine Plenum
In a message dated 11/19/2003 6:36:26 AM Pacific Standard Time, bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com writes: I have dual electronic ign which should make my head temps 10~15 degrees hotter than his but they are lower. I heard one of the advertising claims for the electronic ignition was that it lowered the cylinder head temperature. Which electronic ignition manufacturer are you using? Jim Ayers ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: Frederick Oldenburg <foldenburg(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Drill Size???
When the plans call for a drill size (e.g. 3/16), as opposed to a number (e.g. #12) Am I supposed to use the exact drill size (3/16) or the numbered bit? For example, on DWG 3 in View A-A, as I understand it, the holes that call for an AN426AD4-6 or AN470AD4-6 rivet would get a #30 hole. I undertand how this works, the #30 (decimal 0.1285) is slightly larger then the rivet diameter (4/16 or 1/8 - decimal 0.1250) - no rocket science here. However, in this view, the plans call for "Enlarge/Drill 3/16 DIA in assembly with fuselage, 4 places." I assume this to mean that I do not drill this now, but wait until I am assembling with the fuse. When this happens....am I supposed to use a 3/16 bit? Are these assumptions correct? Thanks, Fred Fred Oldenburg RV-7A - Empennage http://www.rv.oldsack.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: Laird Owens <owens(at)aerovironment.com>
Subject: Re: IFR schools?
I've got to wonder about these one week courses. I just got my ticket 6 months ago, and it took several months of flying 2-3 times a week plus ground school studying. I think I had close to sixty hours of 172 time by the time I took my practical, and I didn't feel ready even then. Maybe I'm a slow learner (mom has said several times that I "MUST" have been dropped on my head at birth...) but I don't see how one could absorb that much info in that amount of time. Now if you have the ground school done, and 20 or so hours of previous hood time, I MIGHT be able to believe it could be done. Now I'm not trying to bust on the schools that do these intense week classes (I used PIC's text as a basis for real world IFR flying and thought it was a very good text) but it just makes me wonder..... Laird RV-6 SoCal (Flew solo in the clouds for the first time last week....freaky!) > >> >> Their are 3 guys at our airport (DNV) that is looking >> to upgrade our tickets for VFR to IFR. What we are >> looking for is a concentrated course where you can > > spend a week and get your IFR rating. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: Ken Balch <kbalch1(at)comcast.net>
Subject: FL tax question
Hey Guys, Can anyone tell me if Florida has a sales or use tax for aircraft? What am I likely to be hit with by the state when I move there in January and they get wind of my RV? Regards, Ken Balch RV-8 N118KB ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Phil N" <pnewlon(at)toosan.com>
Subject: IFR schools?
Date: Nov 19, 2003
I second this! Here's what my Flight Safety instructor told me: Your IFR rating is nothing more than a ticket to learn more. Nobody is ready to tackle hard weather without considerably more ACTUAL experience. To this day (16 years later), since I don't get enough time in actual IFR I typically take a safety pilot along with me if I know I am going to be in weather. If I hit it along the way, I am trained to handle it but I don't go looking for it solo. Read the NTSB reports and you'll be surprised to find how many guys take their newly minted Instrument Rating into the clouds and bury themselves. Phil > I got my ATP through one of those one week course, so I'm not > really one to talk. But please, do yourself a favor, and if > you do get a quick IFR ticket, make sure before you fly in > actual IFR, you get lots of practice with experienced pilots, > both under the hood and in actual IFR. Learning the > principals and rules is not at all difficult, but you really > do need more practice than you can get in a week. Ask anyone > that's flown a lot in the weather, there are times it can be > incredibly challenging. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: Rick Galati <rick6a(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Drill Size???
Fred, Yes, your assumptions are correct and strictly speaking you are to use a 3/16 drill bit. Now heres where I get anal about hole quality as insisted upon and my shop experience at McDonnell-Douglas. First, I would in assembly and using a drill block to insure perpendicularity, drill a #40 or #30 pilot hole through the assembly. Then, using various drill bit sizes on hand, bring the hole up to the .1800-.1850 range in as many steps as desired. Finally I would use a .1875 reamer marinated in boelube or similar for the final full size reaming. When you have an inspector ball gauge every bolt hole you drill, and the average hole can and will be rejected for being as little as 3 thousanths oversize or even less, you tend to learn quickly how little the range of acceptability really is, at least on combat aircraft. In a nutshell, any hole that will be filled with a bolt, close tolerance or otherwise, should in good practice be brought up to full size with a reamer. The steps I just outlined are certainly not necessary for the average subsonic homebuilt, but I dont think of my RV as merely average. Rick Galati RV-6A finishing When the plans call for a drill size (e.g. 3/16), as opposed to a number (e.g.#12) Am I supposed to use the exact drill size (3/16) or the numbered bit? For example, on DWG 3 in View A-A, as I understand it, the holes that call for an AN426AD4-6 or AN470AD4-6 rivet would get a #30 hole. I undertand how this works,the #30 (decimal 0.1285) is slightly larger then the rivet diameter (4/16or 1/8 - decimal 0.1250) - no rocket science here. However, in this view, the plans call for "Enlarge/Drill 3/16 DIA in assembly withfuselage, 4 places." I assume this to mean that I do not drill this now, but wait until I am assembling with the fuse. When this happens....am I supposed to use a 3/16 bit? Are these assumptions correct? Thanks, Fred Fred Oldenburg RV-7A - Empennage http://www.rv.oldsack.com --------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: rob ray <smokyray(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Traveling to Alabama
Since I live there most of the time and grew up in "LA", seeing Destin, FL (57nm) or Dog Island/Apalachicola on a day trip is a must. Stop by my place if you can (Skyranch, 1 nm North of the CEW VOR) 8 RV's are based on the grass strip, you're always welcome. I would see the Army aviation museum as mentioned also. Have fun. RR N13eer(at)aol.com wrote: I'm planning a trip to Enterprise Alabama to visit my brother-in-law over Thanksgiving. I plan on heading down on Saturday and staying about a week depending on weather. Anyone got any advice on leaving a my -8 at the enterprise airport, or an empty hanger there? I have not had a chance to call the FBO but plan to do that tomorrow. Anyone have any must see sight while I'm in LA (lower Alabama) Thanks Alan Kritzman RV-8 --------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Phil N" <pnewlon(at)toosan.com>
Subject: Deburring parts and squaring rib flanges
Date: Nov 19, 2003
I've been plugging along making a stack of deburred HS ribs this week. It takes me something like 20-30 minutes of deburring per piece to get what I consider a satisfactory part based on Van's instructions. Tedious is the word for this, but I thought it was what must be done. I was reading a RV8 website last night (can't remember which one) and the guy stated "it took two hours to deburr and square the flanges of the ribs for the HS". Sheesh, I have twice that already and am not even done deburring let alone squaring! Is 20-30 minutes per rib for deburring excessive (perfectionism)? (File, v-groove deburring tool, Scotchbrite wheel on exposed edges, hand sand nooks and crannies with 400 emery cloth) What about squaring the flange, do I just hand bend the edges to the point they look pretty close or do I need to get out my square and seamer and make sure they're perfect? Yup, there sure are references to squared flanges in the archives. But "straighten them or you'll see them" doesn't tell me if eyeballing is sufficient or if I need to get the square out. (OK, I need a little reassurance here..... I'll take my "insecure perfectionist" issues up with a shrink as soon as I am done building and have the spare time :-) While I'm at it, I'll ask about fluting to straighten the ribs. My ribs range from no bow to the worst being bowed 3/32 (HS806?) I figured to get the 3/32 ones down to the 1/16th range but leave the rest alone. Is 1/16th inch bow good, or should I spend another 5 minutes per part trying to get them closer than that? (and run the risk of ruining one....) It is my assumption that, as wide as the rib is, if I get it within 1/16th and properly positioned in relation to the PP holes, I will be good to go. Thanks! Phil ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: Scott Bilinski <bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com>
Subject: Re: Engine Plenum
I am using LightSpeed elect ign. It lowers exhaust gas temps and raises cylinder head temps. This is due to all the mixture burning in the combustion chamber and none in the exhaust. > >In a message dated 11/19/2003 6:36:26 AM Pacific Standard Time, >bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com writes: >I have dual electronic ign which should make my head temps 10~15 >degrees hotter than his but they are lower. >I heard one of the advertising claims for the electronic ignition was that it >lowered the cylinder head temperature. > >Which electronic ignition manufacturer are you using? > >Jim Ayers > > Scott Bilinski Eng dept 305 Phone (858) 657-2536 Pager (858) 502-5190 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Pat Hatch" <pat_hatch(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: FL tax question
Date: Nov 19, 2003
Ken, Depending on the county you are in, sales tax ranges from 6.5% and higher (7% here in Indian River County). There is no personal property tax here like there is in some states, like North Carolina for example. If you are moving to Florida and have already paid the sales tax on your car or airplane in another state, you do not owe Florida sales tax--unless it has been less than 6 months since you paid the sales tax. Sounds to me like you will not owe any sales tax at all...disclaimer: I am not a tax attorney and what I am telling you is my personal experience only! Hope this helps. Pat Hatch RV-4 RV-6 RV-7 QB (Building) Vero Beach, FL ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Balch" <kbalch1(at)comcast.net> Subject: RV-List: FL tax question > > Hey Guys, > > Can anyone tell me if Florida has a sales or use tax for aircraft? What > am I likely to be hit with by the state when I move there in January and > they get wind of my RV? > > Regards, > Ken Balch > RV-8 N118KB > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: Jim Oke <wjoke(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Denso Alternator Part #
Can anyone comment on the commercial usage of a Nippon Denso alternator part number 18504-6220? An alternative part number is 100211-1680, apparently the actual manufacturer is Ishikawajina and this is their part number. IOW, is there car make/model/year that utilizes this alternator? The situation is that I have one of this alternators on my -6A that came with an Aerosport O-320 (it's the 35 A alternator). It works really well and I would like to retrofit one to my RV-3 and a local autoparts house would be a convenient source. If someone could quote the Canadian Tire product number (they're a big chain of car parts places in the GWN) that would be worth some bonus points. thanks, Jim Oke Winnipeg, MB RV-6A C-GKGZ RV-3 C-FIZM ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Wheeler North <wnorth(at)sdccd.cc.ca.us>
Subject: Timing light
Date: Nov 19, 2003
John, let me add a little too much to Cy's response. First, roughly said, timing is set to cause the maximum average of pressure created to exchange the most amount of rotary force into the crankshaft. The rate of fuel burn (180-220ft per sec) doesn't vary much within normal oprating air/fuel ratios. So if the piston is coming up faster then one has to spark it earlier to achieve the above stated pressure cycle at the right time. This pressure timing point is known as Powell's magic angle (15 deg ATDC) and is true for all reciprocating engines. The other factors that effect the spark timing point is the rate that the induction and exhaust can ventilate the cylinder, and what RPM range the engine is designed to deliver its torque. In any event RPM is the big factor in spark timing. Because aircraft engines are coupled to their drive environment hydraulically (ie a prop in air) rather than in a fixed fashion like a tire on the road, and the fact that this prop has a fairly tight range of torque conversion to thrust (ie AOA of the wing shape only delivers load to the engine, or thrust from the engine in a fairly narrow range of RPM, where a car has to deliver high torque from just above idle to max RPM) they only really need to be timed for a narrow range of RPM. Its easier and more reliable to fix the timing for one RPM value, below that RPM they are over advanced, and above that RPM they are under advanced in timing. So lets say one sets the mags to be most efficent at 75% power which for a fixed pitch which might be 2400 RPM. (This may vary slightly with constant speed engines, but the usually aim for a similar timing RPM, and that said, a constant speed engine is one place that an advanced electronic ignition can really add to fuel efficiency) If the engine goes above this the timing is retarded for that RPM, which is good because it reduces detonation some. If it goes below then it is too far advanced, but who cares because at power settings below 75% a little advance will add power without causing detonation. In any event the total RPM range from 50% to 100% power might be 600 rpm rather than the 4000 rpm range you would find in a ground engine. The only time there is a problem is when starting, as the timing is way too advanced for 150-300 RPM. In this case they use devices to retard only during starting such as an impulse coupler or shower of sparks. Therefore having the time change in an aircraft engine doesn't do much. And having it right on to the 10th of a deg is meaningless becasue you are just saying it most effecient at 2400 rpm rather than 2410. Who cares. It is far more important to get both mags equal then it is to get them on the right deg. And most specs allow for a fairly wide range of error, say .5 to 1.5 degs. Given that the radius of the ring gear is roughly 10 inches, the circumference is 62.8", therefore each degree is roughly 3/16" of travel at the ring gear. With static timing methods that's a lot of sensitivity, there is no need to have a fancy dynamic device for setting this. The real advantage of dynamic timing is it allows one to also test the advancing features of the automotive distributor, but I can assure you that I can get an automotive distributor as accurately timed satically as I can dynamically. I've done it many times when its a bitch to get the timing gun aimed on the pully. This is probably far more than you ever wanted to know though. W From: "John" <n1cxo320(at)salidaco.com> Subject: RV-List: Safety Concerns I have always timed my Lycoming with the #1 cylinder at TDC and the timing mark aligned with the case halves. This has worked for a long time. I now want to get more technical and have purchased a fancy digital timing light that has a LCD screen with direct read out. My concern is: How to use the light on a running engine...I have an RV6A and would have to be up on a step stool behind the prop in order to see what's going on. The notion of slipping off the stool, or otherwise getting tangled up in the prop has me, frankly, more than "concerned" -I can't see standing in from of the prop with the engine going and using the light.... What do you techies do in such a situation? (And, yes, I have checked the archives first.) John ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Fiveonepw(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 19, 2003
Subject: Re: Oil for engine start
Thanks for the reply- Notes "imbedded" below.... > Well, let me ask why not change the oil and filter instead. Oil is > cheap. Filters are cheap. Your engine is not. Cheap insurance. > Agreed- just curious if the oil could actually "age" lying dormant in the engine four years- has had dessicant plugs in entire time and cover plates bolted to exhaust & carb openings- breather & all oil ports plugged... I mean, if there is nothing "wrong" with the oil, why toss it out? > > It has about 850TT on it, is an E3D (150hp) and has been rotated > regularly since > >purchased. > > > This was not really a good thing. Our engines hold all their oil in the > sump, and you cannot turn it over fast enough for the oil pump to do any > good. The oil will drain off everything, leaving a very thin film of > oil in the bottom of the cylinder walls. When you turn the crank, the > rings scrape that thin film off and you have metal to metal contact. > The oil will not stay there. > Clarification- Until bolting to the mount, it was on an engine stand and rotated, or flipped over to submerge the cam & coat the cylinders every couple of months. I also spun it with the starter (plugs out) about once a year until a gauge connected to it showed pressure, about 30-35 psi IIRC. > >Also, I have no idea how long since the Marvel carb that came with the > engine > >has been operated. Is there any particular risk with just bolting it up > and > >seeing if it is OK or is an overhaul normally recommended? > > > This isn't easy to answer, but I'll try. If the carb does NOT have a > throttle pump, I would fill it with fuel and operte the mixture control > to make sure it's fee and just bolt it on and go with no worries. If > there is a throttle pump, I'd fill it with fuel, operate the mixture > control, and work the throttle pump to see if it'll spray fuel down the > throat. If it's wimpy ..... overhaul it. If all seems to work well, > just bolt it on and go with no worries. > It has the pump- basically just checking that the pump seal is pliable enough not to leak? > Either way, the engine will run well or it won't, and if it won't then > there's always the overhauler. You'll run the engine a fair amount of > time before you're ready to fly so the overhauler time won't set you back. > Time's not the problem- it's the spare change to the overhauler that would be a setback- remember it's a USED engine!! 8-) Thanks again- Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Lenleg(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 19, 2003
Subject: Re: Evaluation of ICOM IC-A200 Transceiver
In a message dated 11/19/2003 11:40:35 AM Eastern Standard Time, jconnell(at)rconnect.com writes: Gentlemen (and ladies too), I had decided to install a UPS SL40 in my VFR RV-9A until the recent Garmin buyout. I'm now contemplating an ICOM IC-A200 instead. In reviewing the archives, I'm found only 4 postings. Do any of you have experience and comments about this radio? Thanks, Joe Connell RV-9A N95JJ (finishing kit stage) Joe: I have the ICOM ... have had no problems ... receive and transmit clearly. Wish it had standby freqency monitor though !!! Len Leggette, RV-8A Greensboro, NC N910LL 166 hrs ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: Richard Tasker <retasker(at)optonline.net>
Subject: Re: Deburring parts and squaring rib flanges
Of course my RV9A is not flying yet, so take my advice with a grain of salt... :-) I had the same concern you seem to have when I started. So I called Van's and they said that if you cannot cut yourself on the part you have deburred it enough. The only real problem that deburring must do is to eliminate stress risers that might cause fractures in the future. When the aluminum is cut there are small "bumps" where one set of cutters/shears end and another starts. These could be a problem over the long term. Therefore, they must be removed. Anything beyond that is gravy. If you continue doing what you are doing your plane may last longer than mine. On the other hand, they will both last longer than either one of us will care about! After I got into the groove of deburring, it didn't take all that long. What I ended up doing was to use a file or the 6" scotchbrite wheel to remove the tooling marks from the edges. Then I found that I could remove the sharp corners from the edges better with the standard deburring tool. I found that the dual (V-groove) tool tended to leave a burr unless I went over it several times. The standard deburring tool worked with one pass. Most nooks and crannies can be reached with the standard deburring tool. As far as fluting goes... The amount of bend depends on the curve of the part. You are going to have some parts bowed a whole lot more than the 3/32 you have seen so far as you move along to the wings and fuselage! Once you get the hang of it you will be able to flute a part in short order and will be able to judge how much to flute without constantly checking. When I reached that state, I would just flute the part completely and then do a quick check by laying it flat on my bench or other flat surface. I was usually able to get it within 1/16 on the first pass and then tweak one or two flutes to get it perfect. The bottom line is that it doesn't take long and when you get the hang of it you will be able to get it virtually perfect with little effort. I always did the flanges after the fluting and just bent them by hand in most cases. I checked them by using a square held against the flat side of the part and checking the squareness of the flange. Again, I have been able to get them square quite easily and quickly. I think that as you gain experience you will get faster and more able to do what you have to do by eye with just a final check with the square or the tabletop. Dick Tasker, RV9A, 90573 Fuselage Phil N wrote: > > >I've been plugging along making a stack of deburred HS ribs this week. >It takes me something like 20-30 minutes of deburring per piece to get >what I consider a satisfactory part based on Van's instructions. >Tedious is the word for this, but I thought it was what must be done. I >was reading a RV8 website last night (can't remember which one) and the >guy stated "it took two hours to deburr and square the flanges of the >ribs for the HS". Sheesh, I have twice that already and am not even >done deburring let alone squaring! > >Is 20-30 minutes per rib for deburring excessive (perfectionism)? (File, >v-groove deburring tool, Scotchbrite wheel on exposed edges, hand sand >nooks and crannies with 400 emery cloth) > >What about squaring the flange, do I just hand bend the edges to the >point they look pretty close or do I need to get out my square and >seamer and make sure they're perfect? > >Yup, there sure are references to squared flanges in the archives. But >"straighten them or you'll see them" doesn't tell me if eyeballing is >sufficient or if I need to get the square out. (OK, I need a little >reassurance here..... I'll take my "insecure perfectionist" issues up >with a shrink as soon as I am done building and have the spare time :-) > >While I'm at it, I'll ask about fluting to straighten the ribs. My ribs >range from no bow to the worst being bowed 3/32 (HS806?) I figured to >get the 3/32 ones down to the 1/16th range but leave the rest alone. Is >1/16th inch bow good, or should I spend another 5 minutes per part >trying to get them closer than that? (and run the risk of ruining >one....) It is my assumption that, as wide as the rib is, if I get it >within 1/16th and properly positioned in relation to the PP holes, I >will be good to go. > >Thanks! > >Phil > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: SportAV8R(at)aol.com
Subject: Re: Evaluation of ICOM IC-A200 Transceiver
Echo Len's sentiments on the A200. After 3 years or so, the rubber sleeves on the tuning and volume knobs dry-rotted and fell off, but I can still turn them fine with my fingers on the bare metal. I've been too lazy to contact ICOM for replacement part$. -Bill B ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: Gary Zilik <zilik(at)direcpc.com>
Subject: LED Warning Lamps
Netscape/7.1 (ax) Disclaimer - I have searched the archives I plan on using some small LED's as and enunciator panel for such things as low fuel, starter engaged, low volt, etc. I bought some neat little led's from mouser and the other night I wanted to see how bright they were. Well, I'm here to tell ya their real bright for a nanosecond when 12 volts is applied. It seems pretty obvious I need a simple power supply or something inline with them to lower the voltage. Any of you electronic geniuses have an easy fix???? Vondane??? Gary Zilik ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 18, 2003
Subject: rv-list stupid questions
From: smoothweasel(at)juno.com
To the new builder - keep asking the questions. Chuck Rowbotham RV-8A Thanks Chuck........... Joel "Weasel" Graber ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: JDaniel343(at)aol.com
Subject: Re: LED Warning Lamps
Try placing a 4.7V 1W Zener Diode on the positive lead to the LED and a 1/4 watt 620 Ohm Resistor on the negative lead of the LED. This should let you use a dimmer on the LED's also. Thank Randall Henderson for this. I used two LED's in my roll bar on the pilot side to illuminate the 6 flight instruments. All my other gauges are lighted. John Danielson RV-6 175 hrs. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Patrick Kelley" <webmaster(at)flion.com>
Subject: Drill Size???
Date: Nov 19, 2003
Yes, you will be using a 3/16" bit (or, for the a-retentive, a smaller size followed by a 3/16" close-tolerance reamer). If you look ahead in the plans, you will be using 3/16" bolts here, which is why you wait and drill in assembly (to ensure correct alignment). For your wing spar, you will be using close-tolerance bolts and holes; for the other attachment points it is not as critical but the closer the better. Generally, for bolts, you want a uniformly round hole loose enough for a slip fit (so as not to damage the bolt's shank when inserting it) and tight enough to prevent the joined parts from wiggling. Resist the urge to overtighten the bolt to prevent the latter; if you tighten a bolt enough to resist lateral forces you have almost certainly weakened the shank. I tightened my wing rib bolts by hand before acquiring a torque wrench and ended up replacing them all because I had overtorqued them by a factor of about 3! Generally, a fractional drill will do an adequate job for normal AN bolts, which are sized in 1/16" diameter increments but good practice is to drill the next number size smaller and ream to fit the particular bolt. Patrick Kelley - RV-6A - the hard way (still skinning the fuselage) -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Frederick Oldenburg Subject: RV-List: Drill Size??? When the plans call for a drill size (e.g. 3/16), as opposed to a number (e.g. #12) Am I supposed to use the exact drill size (3/16) or the numbered bit? For example, on DWG 3 in View A-A, as I understand it, the holes that call for an AN426AD4-6 or AN470AD4-6 rivet would get a #30 hole. I undertand how this works, the #30 (decimal 0.1285) is slightly larger then the rivet diameter (4/16 or 1/8 - decimal 0.1250) - no rocket science here. However, in this view, the plans call for "Enlarge/Drill 3/16 DIA in assembly with fuselage, 4 places." I assume this to mean that I do not drill this now, but wait until I am assembling with the fuse. When this happens....am I supposed to use a 3/16 bit? Are these assumptions correct? Thanks, Fred Fred Oldenburg RV-7A - Empennage http://www.rv.oldsack.com = = = = ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: New anti-corrosion policy from Van's?
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: "Condrey, Bob (US SSA)" <bob.condrey(at)baesystems.com>
S2V2aW4sIA0KIA0KSSBqdXN0IGNoZWNrZWQgbXkgUlYtMTAgbWFudWFsIGFnYWluIGFuZCBpdCBz aW1wbHkgc2F5cyB0aGF0IHRoZSBhZGhlc2l2ZSBzdHJlbmd0aGVucyB3aXRoIGFnZSBhbmQgc2hv dWxkIGJlIHJlbW92ZWQgd2l0aGluIGEgZmV3IHdlZWtzLiAgVGhlIHNwZWNpZmljIHJlZmVyZW5j ZSBpcyBvbiBwYWdlIDUtNSwgc2VjdGlvbiA1TS4NCiANCkJvYg0KDQoJLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBN ZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0gDQoJRnJvbTogS2V2aW4gQmVocmVudCBbbWFpbHRvOmtiZWhyZW50QGNhc2Nh ZGlhc29mdHdhcmUuY29tXSANCglTZW50OiBXZWQgMTEvMTkvMjAwMyAwMToyMiBQTSANCglUbzog cnYtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tIA0KCUNjOiANCglTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogUlYtTGlzdDogTmV3 IGFudGktY29ycm9zaW9uIHBvbGljeSBmcm9tIFZhbidzPw0KCQ0KCQ0KDQoJLS0+IFJWLUxpc3Qg bWVzc2FnZSBwb3N0ZWQgYnk6IEtldmluIEJlaHJlbnQgPGtiZWhyZW50QGNhc2NhZGlhc29mdHdh cmUuY29tPg0KCQ0KCUkndmUgY2hlY2tlZCBteSBpbnN0cnVjdGlvbnMgYW5kIG5vIHdoZXJlIGRv ZXMgaXQgc2F5IHRvIHJlbW92ZSB0aGUgcGxhc3RpYw0KCWNvdmVyaW5nIGFzIFZhbidzIHN1Z2dl c3RlZCBvbiB0aGUgcGhvbmUuIEkndmUgc2VlbiBpbiBvbmUgbWVzc2FnZSB0aHJlYWQgdGhhdCBp dA0KCWFwcGVhcnMgaW4gdGhlIFJWLTEwIGluc3RydWN0aW9ucywgYnV0IG9ubHkgdG8gYWR2aXNl IHRoYXQgdGhlIGJsdWUgZmlsbSBpcw0KCWVhc2llciB0byByZW1vdmUgaWYgaXQgaXMgcmVtb3Zl ZCBzb29uZXIgcmF0aGVyIHRoYW4gbGF0ZXIuDQoJDQoJSSB3aWxsIGJlIG1ha2luZyB0aGUgbG9u ZyBkcml2ZSB3aGVyZSBJIGxpdmUgaW4gV2FzaGluZ3RvbiBTdGF0ZSB0byBWYW4ncyB0aGlzDQoJ RnJpZGF5IHRvIGJyaW5nIHRoZSBza2lucyBmb3IgdGhlbSB0byBsb29rIGF0LiAgSSBkb24ndCBo b2xkIG11Y2ggaG9wZSBpbiB0aGVtDQoJaGVscGluZyByZXNvbHZlIHRoZSBwcm9ibGVtIG9ubHkg YmVjYXVzZSBJIGhhdmVuJ3QgaGFkIG11Y2ggbHVjayB3aXRoIHRoZW0uICBJJ3ZlDQoJYmVlbiBh c2tlZCBtYW55IHRpbWVzIHdoeSBJJ3ZlIHRha2VuIHNvIGxvbmcgb24gbXkga2l0LiBQdWJsaWNs eSwgSSd2ZSBzYWlkIEkgd2FzDQoJdG9vIGJ1c3ksIGJ1dCBjbG9zZSBmcmllbmRzIGtub3cgdGhh dCBJIHdhcyBmcnVzdHJhdGVkIHdpdGggdGhlIGtpdCBkdWUgdG8gdGhlDQoJcHJvYmxlbXMgYW5k IGxhY2sgb2Ygc3VwcG9ydCBJIGdvdCBmcm9tIFZhbidzLg0KCQ0KCUZvciBleGFtcGxlLCBteSBm aXJzdCBzZXQgb2YgaG9yeiBzdGFiIHNraW5zIHdlcmUgYm93ZWQgc28gYmFkIHRoYXQgdGhleSBj cmVhdGVkDQoJYSBlbm9ybW91cyBkZW50IGluIHRoZSBjZW50ZXIgcmlicyAoMS84IHNoaW1zIG9u IGJvdGggc2lkZXMgZGlkbid0IGNvbWUgY2xvc2UgdG8NCglmaXhpbmcpLiBJdCBhcHBlYXJlZCB0 aGF0IHRoZSBza2lucyBhY3R1YWxseSBoYWQgYSBjcmVhc2UgaXQgdGhlbSB3aGVuIHRoZXkNCglv cmlnaW5hbGx5IGJlbnQgdGhlIHNraW5zIHNvIHRoYXQgaXQgd2Fzbid0IGdvaW5nIHRvIGxheSBk b3duLiBJIGJvdWdodCBhIG5ldyBzZXQNCglhbmQgZHJvdmUgZG93biB0byBwaWNrIHRoZW0gdXAu IFdoZW4gSSBhcnJpdmVkLCB0aGUgc2tpbnMgd2VyZSBkdWN0ZWQgdGFwZSBjbG9zZWQNCglvbiBl YWNoIGVuZCB3aXRoIG5vdGhpbmcgaW4gdGhlIG1pZGRsZSB3aGljaCBjYXVzZWQgdGhlbSB0byBw b29jaCBvdXQgdGhhdA0KCWNyZWF0ZWQgYSBjcmVhc2UgaW4gdGhlIG1pZGRsZS4gSSBjb21wbGFp bmVkIGFuZCB3YXMgdG9sZCB0byB0YWtlIGl0IG9yIGxlYXZlDQoJaXQuICBXaGVuIEkgcmV0dXJu ZWQgaG9tZSwgSSBmb3VuZCB0aGF0IHRoZXkgZml0IHdvcnNlIHRoYW4gbXkgb3JpZ2luYWxzLg0K CU5lZWRsZXNzIHRvIHNheSwgaXQgdG9vayBhIHllYXIgb2YgaGVhdGluZywgYmVuZGluZywgc2hh cGluZyB0byBmaW5hbGx5IGdldCB0aGVtDQoJdG8gZml0IHJpZ2h0Lg0KCQ0KCVdoZW4gY29udGlu dWluZyB0byB3b3JrIG9uIHRoZSBlbXAsIEkgIGhhZCBwcm9ibGVtcyByZWxhdGluZyB0aGUgaW5z dHJ1Y3Rpb25zIHRvDQoJdGhlIGRyYXdpbmdzLiBPbmx5IGFmdGVyIHJldmlld2luZyBhbm90aGVy IHJ2LTkgYnVpbGRlcnMgcGxhbnMgZGlkIEkgZGlzY292ZXINCgl0aGF0IG15IGRyYXdpbmdzIHdl cmUgbWlzc2luZyBjb21wbGV0ZSBzZWN0aW9ucy4gIE5vdyBJIGtub3cgd2h5IHRoZXJlIHdhcyB0 ZXh0DQoJd2l0aCBhbiBhcnJvdyBwb2ludGluZyBpbnRvIGEgYmxhbmsgc3BhY2UhISAgSSBjYWxs ZWQgVmFuJ3MgYW5kIGFzIHVzdWFsIHRoZQ0KCWluZGl2aWR1YWwgSSBzcG9rZSB0byBkaWRuJ3Qg Y2FyZSBhbmQgc2ltcGx5IHdhbnRlZCB0byBTRUxMIG1lIHRoZSBwcmV2aWV3IHBsYW4NCglzZXQg KHdoaWNoIHdhcyBub3QgYXZhaWxhYmxlIHdoZW4gSSBvcmlnaW5hbGx5IGJvdWdodCBteSBraXQp LiBJIHJlc3BvbmRlZCwgIndoeQ0KCXNob3VsZCBJIGJ1eSBhIHByZXZpZXcgcGxhbiBzZXQgd2hl biBJIGFscmVhZHkgaGF2ZSBhIHNldCBvZiBwbGFucz8iLiBUaGV5DQoJd2VyZW4ndCB3aWxsaW5n IHRvIHNlbmQgbWUgYSByZXBsYWNlbWVudCBkcmF3aW5nKHMpIG5vciB3ZXJlIHRoZXkgd2lsbGlu ZyB0byBzZWxsDQoJbWUgbmV3IGNvcGllcyBvZiB0aGUgZHJhd2luZ3MgaW4gcXVlc3Rpb25zLiBB ZnRlciBtdWNoIGJlZ2dpbmcgYW5kIGxpc3RlbmluZyB0bw0KCXRoZSBWYW4ncyBlbXBsb3llZSBy YW50IGFib3V0IHRoZSBlZmZvcnQgaXQgd291bGQgdGFrZSBvbiBoaXMgcGFydCwgSSByZWNlaXZl ZA0KCXBob3RvY29waWVzIChwb29yIHF1YWxpdHkpIG9mIHRoZSBtaXNzaW5nIHNlY3Rpb25zIG9u IG15IGRyYXdpbmdzLiBOZWVkbGVzcyB0bw0KCXNheSwgSSBub3cgb3duIGEgc2V0IG9mIHByZXZp ZXcgcGxhbnMgdGhhbmtzIHRvIGEgZ2VuZXJvdXMgZ2lmdCBmcm9tIGEgZnJpZW5kLg0KCVRodXMg SSB3YXMgZmluYWxseSBhYmxlIHRvIGZpbmlzaCBteSBlbXAuDQoJDQoJQXQgdGhlIFZhbidzIGhv bWVjb21pbmcsIEkgbWFkZSB0aGUgbWlzdGFrZSBvZiBhc2tpbmcgb25lIG9mIHRoZSAid2VsbCBr bm93biINCglWYW4ncyBlbXBsb3llZXMgd2hhdCBraW5kIG9mIHdhc2ggcHJpbWVyIHdhcyBiZWlu ZyB1c2VkIG9uIHRoZSBRQiBraXRzLiBOb3csIEkndmUNCgliZWVuIGFyb3VuZCBsb25nIGVub3Vn aCB0byBrbm93IE5PVCB0byBhc2sgdGhlbSBhYm91dCB3aGV0aGVyIG9yIG5vdCB0byBwcmltZS4g SQ0KCXNpbXBseSB3YW50ZWQgdG8ga25vdyB0aGUgYnJhbmQsIG5vdCBoaXMgb3Bpbmlvbi4gSW5z dGVhZCwgSSBnb3QgYSBlYXIgZnVsbCBvZg0KCWhpcyBvcGluaW9uIG9mIG1lIGFza2luZyBzdWNo IGEgc3R1cGlkIHF1ZXN0aW9uIHRvIHRoZSBwb2ludCBJIHdhbGtlZCBhd2F5IGJlZm9yZQ0KCUkg ZW1iYXJhc3NlZCBteXNlbGYgYW5kIGdpdmUgaGltIG1pbmUhIE1pbmQgeW91IHRoYXQgaGlzIGJv c3Mgd2FzIHN0YW5kaW5nIG5leHQNCgl0byBoaW0gbG9va2luZyByZWFsbHkgdW5jb21mb3J0YWJs ZSBhYm91dCBoaXMgcmVhY3Rpb24sIGJ1dCBub3Qgd2lsbGluZyB0byBkbw0KCWFueXRoaW5nIGFi b3V0IGl0Lg0KCQ0KCUknbSBvbmx5IHRhbGtpbmcgYWJvdXQgYSBjb3VwbGUgb2YgaW5kaXZpZHVh bHMgaGVyZSBhbmQgbm90IHRoZSBlbnRpcmUgY29tcGFueS4gSQ0KCWFtIGNlcnRhaW5seSBub3Qg dGFsa2luZyBhYm91dCBWYW4gaGltc2VsZiwgb2Ygd2hpY2ggSSBoYXZlIHRoZSB1dG1vc3QgcmVz cGVjdA0KCWZvci4gQnV0LCBteSBleHBlcmllbmNlcyBhbmQgaGVhcmluZyBvdGhlciBzaW1pbGlh ciBvciBldmVuIHdvcnNlIGV4cGVyaWVuY2VzDQoJbGVhZHMgbWUgdG8gYmVsaWV2ZSB0aGF0IFZh bidzIHJlcHV0YXRpb24gZm9yIGN1c3RvbWVyIHN1cHBvcnQgaXMgcmVhbGx5IGF0IHJpc2sNCgli ZWNhdXNlIG9mIHRoZXNlIGluZGl2aWR1YWxzIGFuZCBWYW4ncyBtZ210IG5lZWQgdG8gYWRkcmVz cyBpdCBiZWZvcmUgaXQgYmVjb21lcw0KCXRoZSBub3JtLiAgR2l2aW5nIHRoZSBncm93aW5nIHNp emUgb2YgdGhlIG9wZXJhdGlvbiwgdGhleSBuZWVkIHRvIGJyaW5nIG9uIHBlb3BsZQ0KCXdobyBr bm93IGhvdyB0byBwcm92aWRlIGN1c3RvbWVyIHNlcnZpY2UgYW5kIHByb3Blcmx5IG1hbmFnZSBp dC4gU29tZSBvZiB0aGUNCglpbmRpdmlkdWFscyB0aGV5IGhhdmUgZG9uJ3QgaGF2ZSB0aGUgZXhw ZXJpZW5jZSwgYXR0aXR1ZGUgb3IgcHJvZmVzc2lvbmFsaXNtIHRvDQoJcHJvdmlkZSBpdC4gVGhl eSBhcmUgcHJvYmFibHkgYmVzdCBsZWZ0IGRlc2lnbmluZyB0aGUgbmV4dCBzZXJpZXMgb2YgUlZz Lg0KCQ0KCVNvLCBGcmlkYXkgaXMgYW4gaW1wb3J0YW50IGRheSBmb3IgbWUgYW5kIG15IHJlbGF0 aW9uc2hpcCB3aXRoIFZhbidzLiAgSSB3aWxsIGJlDQoJbWVldGluZyB3aXRoIHNvbWVvbmUgSSd2 ZSBuZXZlciBtZXQgYnV0IGhhdmUgaGVhcmQgZ29vZCB0aGluZ3MgYWJvdXQuIEkgZG9uJ3QNCglw bGFuIG9uIGJyaW5naW5nIG15IHBhc3QgZXhwZXJpZW5jZXMgdXAgYW5kIGNlcnRhaW5seSBob3Bl IHRoaXMgcGVyc29uIHdpbGwNCglleGVyY2lzZSBiZXR0ZXIgImN1c3RvbWVyIHN1cHBvcnQiIHRo YW4gSSBoYXZlIGV4cGVyaWVuY2VkIGluIHRoZSBwYXN0LiBPbmUgd2F5DQoJb3IgYW5vdGhlciwg SSB3aWxsIGJlIGJyaW5naW5nIGhvbWUgbmV3IHNraW5zLg0KCQ0KCVRoYW5rcyBmb3IgbGlzdGVu aW5nLiBObyBuZWVkIHRvIGNvbW1lbnQuIEkgZmVlbCBiZXR0ZXIsIGZvciBub3cuDQoJDQoJRG8g bm90IGFyY2hpdmUuDQoJDQoJDQoJbGlubiB3YWx0ZXJzIHdyb3RlOg0KCQ0KCT4gLS0+IFJWLUxp c3QgbWVzc2FnZSBwb3N0ZWQgYnk6IGxpbm4gd2FsdGVycyA8bHdhbHRlcnMyQGNmbC5yci5jb20+ DQoJPg0KCT4gSSdkIGxpa2UgdG8gbWFrZSBhIHN1Z2dlc3Rpb246ICBUYWtlIHBpY3R1cmVzIG9m IHRoZSBjb3Jyb3Npb24gYW5kIHNlbmQNCgk+IHRoZW0gdG8gVmFuLiAgSWYgeW91IGhhdmUgc21h bGwgcGllY2VzIG9mIGFsdW1pbnVtIHdpdGggdGhlIGNvcnJvc2lvbg0KCT4gLi4uLiBzZW5kIHRo ZW0gdG9vLiAgVGhlcmUgaXMgb2J2aW91c2x5IGEgcHJvYmxlbSB0aGF0IHNob3VsZCBiZQ0KCT4g YWRkcmVzc2VkLiAgSSBkbyBub3Qga25vdyB3aGVuIHRoZSBmaWxtIGlzIGFwcGxpZWQsIGJ1dCB0 aGUgYWRoZXNpdmUgbWF5DQoJPiBiZSB0aGUgY3VscHJpdC4gIE5vYm9keSB3aWxsIGtub3cgdW5s ZXNzIHRoZSBwcm9ibGVtIGlzIGFkZHJlc3NlZCAuLi4uDQoJPiBhbmQgVmFuIGlzIHRoZSBwcm9w ZXIgZm9jYWwgcG9pbnQuICBUaGUgYWx1bWludW0gc2hlZXRzIHdlIHVzZSBhcmUNCgk+IGNvYXRl ZCB3aXRoIHB1cmUgYWx1bWludW0uICBJdCdzIHZlcnkgdGhpbiwgYW5kIHNjcmF0Y2hlcyBjYW4g ZWFzaWx5DQoJPiBwZW5ldHJhdGUgdGhyb3VnaCB0aGUgY2xhZCB0byB0aGUgYmFzZSBhbHVtaW51 bSBhbGxveSBhbmQgcHJvZHVjZSB0aGUNCgk+IHBvc3NpYmlsaXR5IG9mIGNvcnJvc2lvbi4gIFRo aXMgaXMgd2h5IGl0J3MgZ29vZCB0byBwcm90ZWN0IHRoZSBjbGFkIGJ5DQoJPiBsZWF2aW5nIHRo ZSBmaWxtIG9uIGFuZCBvbmx5IHJlbW92aW5nIHRoZSBmaWxtIHdoZXJlIHJpdmV0aW5nLiAgU28s IGFzDQoJPiBpdCB3YXMgc28gZWxvcXVlbnRseSBwdXQgLi4uLiBiZXR3ZWVuIGEgcm9jayBhbmQg YSBoYXJkIHBsYWNlIC4uLi4gd2hhdA0KCT4gdG8gZG8uICBBbm90aGVyIGxpc3RlciByZWFkIGhp cyBwbGFucy9pbnN0cnVjdGlvbnMgLi4uIHdoaWNoIHNhaWQgcmVtb3ZlDQoJPiB0aGUgZmlsbS4g IFNlZW1zIGxpa2UgdGhhdCdzIHdoYXQgeSdhbGwgIHNob3VsZCBkby4NCgk+IExpbm4gV2FsdGVy cw0KCT4gRG8gbm90IGFyY2hpdmUNCgk+DQoJPiBDdXJ0IEhvZmZtYW4gd3JvdGU6DQoJPg0KCT4g Pi0tPiBSVi1MaXN0IG1lc3NhZ2UgcG9zdGVkIGJ5OiAiQ3VydCBIb2ZmbWFuIiA8Y2hvZmZtYW45 QGNpbmNpLnJyLmNvbT4NCgk+ID4NCgk+ID5UaGlzIHRocmVhZCB3b3JyaWVkIG15IHNvbWUgc28g SSB3ZW50IGRvd25zdGFpcnMgdG8gcHVsbCBvZmYgdGhlIHBsYXN0aWMgb24NCgk+ID5teSB3aW5n cy4gSSBoYXZlIGhhZCBteSB3aW5nIGtpdCBmb3IgYWJvdXQgdGhyZWUgeWVhcnMgbm93LiBMb25n IGVub3VnaCB0aGF0DQoJPiA+dGhlIHBsYXN0aWMgb24gdGhlIHdpbmdzIGlzIHRoZSBvbGQgY2xl YXIgc3R1ZmYgd2hpbGUgdGhlIHBsYXN0aWMgb24gdGhlDQoJPiA+dGFpbCBpcyBibHVlIChJIHdl bnQgYmFja3dhcmRzIHNpbmNlIEkgaGFkIGFscmVhZHkgYnVpbHQgYSB0YWlsIG9uIGEgLTYpLg0K CT4gPkFmdGVyIHJlbW92aW5nIGFsbCB0aGUgcGxhc3RpYyBJIGZvdW5kIHNvbWUgY29ycm9zaW9u LiBNb3N0bHkgd2FzIGxpdHRsZSBwaW4NCgk+ID5zcG90cyBoZXJlIGFuZCB0aGVyZSBidXQgb25l IG9mIHRoZSBib3R0b20gc2tpbnMgSSBoYXZlbid0IHJpdmV0ZWQgeWV0DQoJPiA+cGVuZGluZyBt eSBlbGVjdHJpY2FsIGRlY2lzaW9ucyAgaGFkIHF1aXRlIGEgYml0LiBMb29rZWQgbGlrZSBsaXR0 bGUgdGlueQ0KCT4gPmRvdHMuIEkgd2FzIGFibGUgdG8gcG9saXNoIHRoZW0gb3V0IHdpdGggc29t ZSBzY3J1YmJpbmcgd2l0aCBhIHNjb3RjaCBicml0ZQ0KCT4gPnBhZC4gVGhlIGluc2lkZXMgb2Yg YWxsIHRoZSBzdXJmYWNlcyB3ZXJlIGFsbCBmaW5lIHNpbmNlIEkgYWxvZGluZWQgYW5kDQoJPiA+ cHJpbWVyZWQgdGhlbS4NCgk+ID4NCgk+ID5BcyB0byB0aGUgb2xkIHBsYXN0aWMgZ2V0dGluZyBo YXJkIHRvIHJlbW92ZS0gaXQgaXMgYSBsb3QgZWFzaWVyIHRvIHJlbW92ZQ0KCT4gPnRoZSBvbGQg Y2xlYXIgcGxhc3RpYyBmcm9tIHRoZSB3aW5ncyB0aGVuIHRoZSBicmFuZCBuZXcgYmx1ZSBwbGFz dGljIG9mZiB0aGUNCgk+ID5ydWRkZXIgYW5kIGVsZXZhdG9ycy4gVGhhdCBibHVlIHN0dWZmIGlz IHRoaW5uZXIgYW5kIHN0aWNrcyBhIGxvdCBtb3JlLiBJDQoJPiA+dGhpbmsgYmVjYXVzZSBpdCBp cyB0aGlubmVyIGl0IHRlYXJzIC8gcHVuY3R1cmVzIGVhc2llciBpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIGp1c3QNCgk+ ID5wdWxsaW5nIG9mZi4NCgk+ID4NCgk+ID5JIGd1ZXNzIEkgaGFkIHNlZW4gc28gbWFueSBwaWN0 dXJlcyBvZiB3aW5ncyB3aXRoIG9ubHkgdGhlIHBsYXN0aWMgb3ZlciB0aGUNCgk+ID5yaXZldCBs aW5lcyByZW1vdmVkIEkgbGF0Y2hlZCBvbiB0byB0aGF0IHBsYW4uIEl0IGRvZXMgcHJvdGVjdCB0 aGUgc2tpbiBmcm9tDQoJPiA+c2NyYXRjaGVzIGJ1dCBhcyBub3RlZCBjYW4gY2F1c2Ugc29tZSBj b3Jyb3Npb24uIFJvY2tzIGFuZCBoYXJkIHBsYWNlcyBjb21lDQoJPiA+dG8gbWluZCBmb3IgdXMg c2xvdyBidWlsZGVycy4NCgk+ID4NCgk+ID5DdXJ0IEhvZmZtYW4NCgk+ID5SVi05QSB3aW5ncyBk b25lIGZvciBub3ctIHdvcmtpbmcgb24gdGFpbA0KCT4gPlF1aWNrIGJ1aWxkIGZ1c2VsYWdlIG5v dyBpbiBiYXNlbWVudA0KCT4gPlBpcGVyIENoZXJva2VlIE41MzIwVw0KCT4gPjE5NzQgVFI2DQoJ PiA+DQoJPg0KCQ0KCS0tDQoJS2V2aW4gQmVocmVudA0KCUNhc2NhZGlhIFNvZnR3YXJlLCBJbmMu DQoJMzYwMCBQb3J0IG9mIFRhY29tYSBSb2FkDQoJU3VpdGUgMjEwDQoJVGFjb21hLCBXQSA5ODQy NA0KCVdyazogKDI1MykgODk2LTQwMDAgeDEwNA0KCUZheDogKDI1MykgODk2LTM2ODANCglrYmVo cmVudEBjYXNjYWRpYXNvZnR3YXJlLmNvbQ0KCQ0KCQ0KCV8tPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0NCglfLT0N CglfLT0gICAgICAgLS0gUGxlYXNlIFN1cHBvcnQgWW91ciBMaXN0cyBUaGlzIE1vbnRoIC0tDQoJ Xy09ICAgICAgICAgICAoQW5kIEdldCBTb21lIEFXRVNPTUUgRlJFRSBHaWZ0cyEpDQoJXy09DQoJ Xy09ICAgTm92ZW1iZXIgaXMgdGhlIEFubnVhbCBMaXN0IEZ1bmQgUmFpc2VyLiAgQ2xpY2sgb24g dGhlDQoJXy09ICAgQ29udHJpYnV0aW9uIGxpbmsgYmVsb3cgdG8gZmluZCBvdXQgbW9yZSBhYm91 dCB0aGlzDQoJXy09ICAgeWVhcidzIFRlcnJpZmljIEZyZWUgR2lmdHMhIFRoYW5rIHlvdSBmb3Ig eW91ciBnZW5lcm91cw0KCV8tPSAgIHN1cHBvcnQhICAgIC1NYXR0IERyYWxsZSwgTGlzdCBBZG1p bi4NCglfLT0NCglfLT0gICAgICAgICAgIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9jb250cmli dXRpb24NCglfLT0NCglfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ0KCV8tPSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgLSBUaGUg UlYtTGlzdCBFbWFpbCBGb3J1bSAtDQoJXy09IFRoaXMgZm9ydW0gaXMgc3BvbnNvcmVkIGVudGly ZWx5IHRocm91Z2ggdGhlIENvbnRyaWJ1dGlvbnMNCglfLT0gb2YgTGlzdCBtZW1iZXJzLiAgWW91 J2xsIG5ldmVyIHNlZSBiYW5uZXIgYWRzIG9yIGFueSBvdGhlcg0KCV8tPSBmb3JtIG9mIGRpcmVj dCBhZHZlcnRpc2luZyBvbiB0aGUgTWF0cm9uaWNzIEZvcnVtcy4NCglfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PQ0KCV8tPSAhISBORVcgISENCglfLT0gQUxMIE5FVyBMSVNUIENIQVQhISBodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1h dHJvbmljcy5jb20vY2hhdA0KCV8tPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09DQoJXy09IExpc3QgUmVsYXRlZCBJ bmZvcm1hdGlvbg0KCV8tPSAgUG9zdCBNZXNzYWdlOiAgIHJ2LWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbQ0K CV8tPSAgVU4vU1VCU0NSSUJFOiAgIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9zdWJzY3JpcHRp b24NCglfLT0gIExpc3QgRkFROiAgICAgICBodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vRkFRL1JW LUxpc3QuaHRtDQoJXy09ICBTZWFyY2ggRW5naW5lOiAgaHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29t L3NlYXJjaA0KCV8tPSAgNy1EYXkgQnJvd3NlOiAgIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9i cm93c2UvcnYtbGlzdA0KCV8tPSAgQnJvd3NlIERpZ2VzdHM6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNz LmNvbS9kaWdlc3QvcnYtbGlzdA0KCV8tPSAgTGl2ZSBMaXN0IENoYXQ6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0 cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9jaGF0DQoJXy09ICBBcmNoaXZlczogICAgICAgaHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25p Y3MuY29tL2FyY2hpdmVzDQoJXy09ICBQaG90byBTaGFyZTogICAgaHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25p Y3MuY29tL3Bob3Rvc2hhcmUNCglfLT0gIExpc3QgU3BlY2lmaWM6ICBodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJv bmljcy5jb20vcnYtbGlzdA0KCV8tPSAgT3RoZXIgTGlzdHM6ICAgIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9u aWNzLmNvbS9lbWFpbGxpc3RzDQoJXy09ICBUcm91YmxlIFJlcG9ydCAgaHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRy b25pY3MuY29tL3Ryb3VibGUtcmVwb3J0DQoJXy09ICBDb250cmlidXRpb25zOiAgaHR0cDovL3d3 dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL2NvbnRyaWJ1dGlvbg0KCV8tPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09DQoJDQoJDQoJ DQoJDQoJDQoNCg= ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ron Walker" <ron(at)walker.net>
Subject: Re: LED Warning Lamps
Date: Nov 19, 2003
Your problem is that you need to add a resistor in series with the LED. Essentially the LED alone created a short circuit on the power supply until it burned out. Using ohms law of V = IR, re-arranging to resolve resistance R = V/I. So, voltage will be 12 - assuming a standard battery, current is the current rating of the LED - assuming 20ma, the resistance would be .... hmm ... well just read this web site page and it explains it MUCH better than me! http://www.theledlight.com/LED101.html Ron ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "J. R. Dial" <jrdial@hal-pc.org>
Subject: Cockpit Lights
Date: Nov 19, 2003
I am going to use three or four of the little "eyeball" lights from VANS for interior and panel lighting and I was wondering if people that have used these before have any recommendations on mounting locations. It is an RV6 slider. (Close to finished) Thanks, Dick Dial ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6(at)cox.net>
Subject: marvel carb fuel line attach question
Date: Nov 19, 2003
I am attaching the fuel line to the marvel carb on my 0-320. I need the fitting that screws into the carb for attaching the fuel line. Is that a special fitting or just a 1/8NPT or a flare fitting where it screws into the carb? Thanks, Jerry Calvert Edmond Ok RV6 N296JC res ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: LED Warning Lamps
Date: Nov 20, 2003
From: <John.Morrissey(at)csiro.au>
Hi Gary, All you need is a resistor to limit the current into the LED. Most leds require around 20 ma, so for 12 Volts at 20 ma try a 720 ohm resistor for about 16ma of current (E=IR or Volts = Current in Amps X Resistance in ohms) Have a look at http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/Sample_Projects/Ohms_Law/ohmslaw.html Why 720 ohms? That's a standard resistor size and allows a little leeway for voltage spikes Experiment!! Cheers John Morrissey -----Original Message----- From: Gary Zilik [mailto:zilik(at)direcpc.com] Subject: RV-List: LED Warning Lamps Disclaimer - I have searched the archives I plan on using some small LED's as and enunciator panel for such things as low fuel, starter engaged, low volt, etc. I bought some neat little led's from mouser and the other night I wanted to see how bright they were. Well, I'm here to tell ya their real bright for a nanosecond when 12 volts is applied. It seems pretty obvious I need a simple power supply or something inline with them to lower the voltage. Any of you electronic geniuses have an easy fix???? Vondane??? Gary Zilik = = = = ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John" <n1cxo320(at)salidaco.com>
Subject: Re: New anti-corrosion policy from Van's?
Date: Nov 19, 2003
fL34M34r3-K9348hJNDU JSDMNF I couldn't agree more ! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom & Cathy Ervin" <tcervin(at)valkyrie.net>
Subject: Engine Plenum
Date: Nov 19, 2003
John, Gary, Scott & Don......Thanks for all the input both on and off the list concerning Plenum VS. Plans Approach. Your time and input is much appreciated. DO NOT ARCHIVE Tom in Ohio ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom & Cathy Ervin" <tcervin(at)valkyrie.net> Subject: RV-List: Engine Plenum > > List, Getting ready to fabricate the engine baffles on my RV6-A with an 0-360A1A and was wondering if anybody who has went the route of a sealed Aluminum Plenum can give any feedback? > 1) Would you do it again? > 2) Notice better cooling? > 3) Increased speed? > Don Eaves had some great pictures on the List Photo Share but very little info in the archives. > Tom in Ohio > Cowling and paint > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stein Bruch" <stein(at)steinair.com>
Subject: LED Warning Lamps
Date: Nov 19, 2003
Go to radio shack, buy the $1.99 panel mount LED's (Green, Red, Amber) that take a 1/4" hole. Get the ones that already have the resistor in line which will handle 12 volts directly. I have one of these on my fuel pump toggle, so I have a small reminder and don't forget it's on! Cheers, Stein Bruch http://www.steinair.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Gary Zilik Subject: RV-List: LED Warning Lamps Disclaimer - I have searched the archives I plan on using some small LED's as and enunciator panel for such things as low fuel, starter engaged, low volt, etc. I bought some neat little led's from mouser and the other night I wanted to see how bright they were. Well, I'm here to tell ya their real bright for a nanosecond when 12 volts is applied. It seems pretty obvious I need a simple power supply or something inline with them to lower the voltage. Any of you electronic geniuses have an easy fix???? Vondane??? Gary Zilik ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jerry Isler" <jlisler(at)alltel.net>
Subject: Re: Traveling to Alabama
Date: Nov 19, 2003
Alan, If you want to see something impressive, cruise up to Troy, Alabama (KTOI) and drop in on the Wiley Sanders (of Wiley Sanders Truck Lines fame) hangers. It's less than 30 miles north of where you will be and is one of the most impressive personal collections of aircraft you will see. Fellow lister Craig Hiers and myself went there last Saturday to see what was new. This guy has the following: Two B-25's and one each of the following: P-51, T-28, L-19 Bird Dog, DC-3, AD-1 Skyraider, Beech 18, T-6, Stearman Biplane, Gulfstream II, Cessna Citation, S2 tracker, and the second T-2 Buckeye jet trainer in civilian hands. The T-2 was fresh out of rebuild and was absolutely beautiful in gleaming white with orange trim. There was also a Harmon Rocket and another Gulfstream II in the hangers that belonged to one of Sanders partners. I probably left something off the list. We were made welcome and were allowed free access to all the aircraft. It humbles me to see how the poor folks live........ Jerry Isler RV4 N455J Donalsonville, GA > > I'm planning a trip to Enterprise Alabama to visit my brother-in-law over Thanksgiving. I plan on heading down on Saturday and staying about a week depending on weather. Anyone got any advice on leaving a my -8 at the enterprise airport, or an empty hanger there? I have not had a chance to call the FBO but plan to do that tomorrow. Anyone have any must see sight while I'm in LA (lower Alabama) > > Thanks > Alan Kritzman > RV-8 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: Gert <gert(at)execpc.com>
Subject: Re: LED Warning Lamps
Bill In the end it depends on the voltage drop for your LED and the current through the LED. Not all LED are created equal so you will need those parameters, Radio Shack tends to print this info right on the back of the package. So, if a LED runs on 1.7 volts at 20 millAmp the resistor would be: (bus voltage - LED voltage ) divided by LED current, rounded to the nearest commercial resistor value. Aerolectrics website has a very good primer on LED's and how to calculate these values. of course you could gang several LED's in series to get close to the bus volatge in your airplane. try http://www.aeroelectric.com/articles/leds3.pdf Gert Gary Zilik wrote: > > Disclaimer - I have searched the archives > > I plan on using some small LED's as and enunciator panel for such things > as low fuel, starter engaged, low volt, etc. I bought some neat little > led's from mouser and the other night I wanted to see how bright they > were. Well, I'm here to tell ya their real bright for a nanosecond when > 12 volts is applied. It seems pretty obvious I need a simple power > supply or something inline with them to lower the voltage. Any of you > electronic geniuses have an easy fix???? Vondane??? > > Gary Zilik > > > > > > > > -- is subject to a download and archival fee in the amount of $500 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: Charlie & Tupper England <cengland(at)netdoor.com>
Subject: RV-7 E-607PP, E-606PP, & elevator center pivot assembly
Questions for you -7 & -8 fully prepunched tail builders: 1. Anyone else have an E-607PP trim tab spar that tapers faster than the E-606PP trim spar in the elevator? The forward, outboard corner of my tab is thinner by about 1/8" than the elevator where they 'meet'. 2. The instructions on DWG 5 for assembling the elevator horn weldments to the hor. stab. bearing say that you should use no more than 3 AN960-416's on each side of the bearing. All the parts of my tail assy have fit with the prepunched holes lining up properly, but I need at least 4 AN960-416's & an AN960-416L on one side & at least an additional AN960-416L on the other side to avoid stressing the other hinge brackets. Did anyone else go with the obvious solution of more washers & a longer bolt? Tip for those like me without a convenient lathe to make the bearing drill bushing (for drilling the horn weldments): I found a nylon standoff at the hardware store that was 1/4" outside & #4 screw size inside. I used whatever size drill from my drill index that was a snug fit in the standoff. Thanks, Charlie (hoping my wing skins haven't turned to powder sitting in the boxes over the last 5 months) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: Oil for engine start
Date: Nov 19, 2003
The "aged" oil doesn't bother me since it hasn't been contaminated by combustion. The Carb on the other hand should be checked for the proper float. There are 4 versions of the float. The old ADed metal, the first plastic float which will sink after being in fuel a while, an improved metal float and finally a second generation plastic. There should be some markings on the carb if indicating the float inside. Also the 2 piece venturi needs to be checked for looseness. If it isn't loose don't what every you do change to the one piece venturi. If it is loose you have to make the change which isn't always the best. You also should check with a mirror to see if the venturi has heat damage or is melted from a back fire. Cy Galley, TC - Chair, Emergency Aircraft Repair, Oshkosh Editor, EAA Safety Programs cgalley(at)qcbc.org or experimenter(at)eaa.org Always looking for articles for the Experimenter ----- Original Message ----- From: <Fiveonepw(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: Oil for engine start > > > Thanks for the reply- Notes "imbedded" below.... > > > Well, let me ask why not change the oil and filter instead. Oil is > > cheap. Filters are cheap. Your engine is not. Cheap insurance. > > > Agreed- just curious if the oil could actually "age" lying dormant in the > engine four years- has had dessicant plugs in entire time and cover plates bolted > to exhaust & carb openings- breather & all oil ports plugged... I mean, if > there is nothing "wrong" with the oil, why toss it out? > > > > It has about 850TT on it, is an E3D (150hp) and has been rotated > > regularly since > > >purchased. > > > > > This was not really a good thing. Our engines hold all their oil in the > > sump, and you cannot turn it over fast enough for the oil pump to do any > > good. The oil will drain off everything, leaving a very thin film of > > oil in the bottom of the cylinder walls. When you turn the crank, the > > rings scrape that thin film off and you have metal to metal contact. > > The oil will not stay there. > > > Clarification- Until bolting to the mount, it was on an engine stand and > rotated, or flipped over to submerge the cam & coat the cylinders every couple of > months. I also spun it with the starter (plugs out) about once a year until a > gauge connected to it showed pressure, about 30-35 psi IIRC. > > > >Also, I have no idea how long since the Marvel carb that came with the > > engine > > >has been operated. Is there any particular risk with just bolting it up > > and > > >seeing if it is OK or is an overhaul normally recommended? > > > > > This isn't easy to answer, but I'll try. If the carb does NOT have a > > throttle pump, I would fill it with fuel and operte the mixture control > > to make sure it's fee and just bolt it on and go with no worries. If > > there is a throttle pump, I'd fill it with fuel, operate the mixture > > control, and work the throttle pump to see if it'll spray fuel down the > > throat. If it's wimpy ..... overhaul it. If all seems to work well, > > just bolt it on and go with no worries. > > > > It has the pump- basically just checking that the pump seal is pliable enough > not to leak? > > > Either way, the engine will run well or it won't, and if it won't then > > there's always the overhauler. You'll run the engine a fair amount of > > time before you're ready to fly so the overhauler time won't set you back. > > > Time's not the problem- it's the spare change to the overhauler that would be > a setback- remember it's a USED engine!! 8-) > > Thanks again- > Mark > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: Heat Muff
Date: Nov 19, 2003
At least on the Cessna and my 48 Bellanca, the loop has a dump so there is always cooling air going thru the muff. When you nee heat, the air stream is diverted into the cabin. The air stream itself is never shut off, just rerouted. Even the carb heat is done this way in many airplanes. Cy Galley - Bellanca Champion Club Newsletter Editor & EAA TC www.bellanca-championclub.com Actively supporting Aeroncas every day Quarterly newsletters on time Reasonable document reprints ----- Original Message ----- From: "linn walters" <lwalters2(at)cfl.rr.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: Heat Muff > > smoothweasel(at)juno.com wrote: > > > > > > >Good Day to everyone!!! Today a follow RV builder was here to look at > >my project and was concerned that I did NOT have provisions to vent my > >heat muff when the heater is not in use. He seemed to think the exhaust > >needed some kind of cooling. Is there anyone out there flying that > >does not have these provisions? Thanx > > > >Joel "Weasel" Graber > >RV-4 trying to finish > >Brooksville MS > > > Take a look at a certified aircraft if you get the chance. My > experience says the cabin/windshield heat is a closed system with a > control to open the valve to the cockpit. No other vent if the heat is > not in use. > Linn > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Don Eaves" <doneaves(at)midsouth.rr.com>
Subject: Re: marvel carb fuel line attach question
Date: Nov 19, 2003
Jerry go to this link: http://home.kc.rr.com/pauljana/fwfhoses.gif Looks like an AN822-6D Don Don Eaves doneaves(at)midsouth.rr.com RV 6 Flying 200 + Hrs. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Calvert" <rv6(at)cox.net> Subject: RV-List: marvel carb fuel line attach question > > I am attaching the fuel line to the marvel carb on my 0-320. I need the fitting that screws into the carb for attaching the fuel line. > > Is that a special fitting or just a 1/8NPT or a flare fitting where it screws into the carb? > > Thanks, > Jerry Calvert > Edmond Ok RV6 > N296JC res > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: kempthornes <kempthornes(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Evaluation of ICOM IC-A200 Transceiver
> >Echo Len's sentiments on the A200. After 3 years or so, the rubber >sleeves on the tuning and volume knobs dry-rotted and fell off, but I can >still turn them fine with my fingers on the bare metal. I've been too >lazy to contact ICOM for replacement part$. Me too. I still have one of the rubber sleeves but guess I need to ask for two. Heat also warped the top of the plastic faceplate. It is, however, a nice low cost radio. hal kempthorne ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: kempthornes <kempthornes(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: LED Warning Lamps
> >All you need is a resistor to limit the current into the LED. Most leds >require around 20 ma, so for 12 Volts at 20 ma try a 720 ohm resistor >for about 16ma of current (E=IR or Volts = Current in Amps X Resistance >in ohms) For sure all you need is a resistor, mine has been working for over 150 hours now. What we need to limit is the voltage across the LED I think. More than about 5V blow them away. Since the LED draws about 20ma as you say, and this value is at 5V then the resistance of the LED is: E=IR 5 = 0.020 * R therefore R = 5 / 0.020 or 250 ohms the completed circuit, in order to drop to 5V should be E=IR 12 = 0.020 * (250 + R) therefore R = 350 --- I think I used a 470 ohms but maybe I guessed! Maybe the resistor is in parallel. This email is about as useless as some of the dull witted humor we see on the rvlist. Maybe we need electric bob? K. H. (Hal) Kempthorne RV6-a N7HK - Three trips to OSH now. PRB (El Paso de Robles, CA) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Darwin N. Barrie" <ktlkrn(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: tip-up rear window fit
Date: Nov 19, 2003
This was extremely frustrating. I thought everything would be very nice after the "Big Cut." Man was I wrong. I squared up the canopy part to my line on the roll bar by cutting, sanding. When satisfied with that I did the same to the rear window portion. Finally, when it was all close I taped everything down and ran the cutting disc between the two pieces for an exact spacing. Worked great but go slow. Darwin N. Barrie Chandler AZ ----- Original Message ----- From: "thomas a. sargent" <sarg314(at)earthlink.net> Subject: RV-List: tip-up rear window fit > > I have the rear window on my RV-6A tip-up close to its final size, but not yet drilled to the F-674 skin or the roll bar. When I clamp it in place I notice that it lays flat along the top of the roll bar, but along the sides of the roll bar, there is about 1/16" gap between the forward edge of the plexi and the surface of the roll bar. There the plexi contacts the roll bar only at its aft edge. > > When you think of the geometry of the situation, it seems to me that this is inescapable. The roll bar is built square, that is, the part that the plexi lays on is perpendicular to the bar's forward and aft faces. But the plexi tapers towards the back the same way the fuselage does. Since the roll bar is slanted back, its top edge is tilted at an angle that matches the angle of the plexi, but the tilt does almost nothing to change the angle that the sides make to the plexi. > > I never noticed noticed this gap on other planes before, but it seems like it's designed in. I guess one solution would be to cut the forward edge of the window back further. Right now it is trimmed to put its forward edge 3/8" back from the forward face of the roll bar - as the plan require. > > Have other people seen the same effect? How have you dealt with it? > > -- > Tom Sargent > RV-6A > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "GMC" <gmcnutt(at)intergate.ca>
Subject: Cockpit Lights
Date: Nov 19, 2003
I am going to use three or four of the little "eyeball" lights from VANS for interior and panel lighting and I was wondering if people that have used these before have any recommendations on mounting locations. It is an RV6 slider. (Close to finished) Thanks, Dick Dial Hi Dick Yes I like the eyeball lights, used three. Two on left side for flight instruments, one on right side with Vans internally lighted engine instruments. Left and right sides have separate rheostats. I located lights on forward side at base of roll bar on inside of the reinforcement plate. Made up a matching light mount plate and drilled/threaded flange of reinforcement (front angle) for tiny screws to hold light mounting plate. With two lights close to flight instruments you can aim each at different sections of panel and get good panel coverage, have no other RV to compare it to but I would think that if the lights were further aft or mounted lower they would light up too much area and cause distracting reflections. My instrument panel is black semi gloss and reflections are very minimal. IMHO it looks good and panel lighting is equivalent to or better than many certified aircraft. Would I do it that way again? The right side light has packed it in (wiring?) and will be repaired/replaced this weekend during annual inspection, so next time I will put two lights on right side for redundancy - same location. 6A slider - 220 hrs, about 6 at night - down for annual. George McNutt Langley B.C ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: Bobby Hester <bhester(at)hopkinsville.net>
OhioValleyRVators(at)yahoogroups.com
Subject: AeroElectric Connection Seminar
Anyone wanting to attend a AeroElectric Connection Wiring Seminar near Nashville,TN please goto: http://www.aeroelectric.com/seminars/Nashville.html and register. The date has not been set yet. I'm guessing because not enough people have signed up. If your getting close to wiring your plane and have not heard of the AeroElectric Connection Wiring Seminar then go here and read all about it: http://www.aeroelectric.com/seminars/seminars.html I have nothing to do with this seminar, I'm just wanting a date to be set so I can attend! -- Surfing the Web from Hopkinsville, KY Visit my web site at: http://www.geocities.com/hester-hoptown/RVSite/ RV7A Slowbuild wings-QB Fuse :-) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Eustace Bowhay" <ebowhay(at)jetstream.net>
Subject: First flight decisons
Date: Nov 19, 2003
In addition to all that has been said on this subject one of the most important items is the engine. If one is starting with a new or overhauled engine it is critical that ground running be kept to an absolute minimum. For me this would be a start-up and checking for any snags, clearing the snags if any then out to the runway and gone. The reason for this is the engine needs to be run at power settings high enough to seat the rings like 75% in cruise until the oil consumption stabilizes. Taxiing and running up and down the runway will glaze the cylinders and you will have a oil burner with the only cure being to pull the cylinders and deglaze and new rings. This mean that the first flight should be done by someone that is current on the RV and needs no practicing on the ground. Not trying to discourage anyone from doing the first flight but you have to be honest with yourself and ask if your prepared to go under these conditions. Eustace Bowhay Blind Bay, B.C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Eustace Bowhay" <ebowhay(at)jetstream.net>
Subject: New Anti-Corrosion Policy from Van's
Date: Nov 19, 2003
Over the years I have followed the posts regarding the problems some have had with removing the clear plastic protection from the skins in the kits. The recent posts regarding corrosion problems between the plastic and the metal is the first I had heard about it. I will pass along my experience in this area. I received my fuselage kit for the 6A in January/97 and during the building process removed the plastic on the rivet lines only. Being aware of the possibility of the plastic setting up with time I would occasionally check to see if it was getting hard to remove. There was no evidence of this so left it on until it was ready to paint (Sept/03), it came off with no trouble, no tearing or excessive pulling required. The only thing I noticed was that if it was pulled back parallel to the skin there was a tendency for it to leave a trace of the adhesive on the skins. By pulling it 90 degrees to the metal it came of clean. Corrosion between the plastic and the skin was not thought of at this time. There wasn't a trace of corrosion, all the skins looked the same as the day they came from Van's. The fuselage kit was stored and build in my shop which is heated when required and we are in a area of low humidity. The plastic was removed with the shop temperature at 24C (75F). Van's says the new blue vinyl strengthens with time and should be removed if parts are to be stored for longer than a few weeks. Eustace Bowhay Blind Bay, B.C ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 20, 2003
From: "Richard E. Tasker" <retasker(at)optonline.net>
Subject: Re: RV-7 E-607PP, E-606PP, & elevator center pivot assembly
Well, I have a 9A but I had the same situation. I had to get a longer bolt. If I remember correctly when I asked Van's about it they said extra washers were okay if necessary. Dick Tasker, 90573 Fuselage Charlie & Tupper England wrote: > >Questions for you -7 & -8 fully prepunched tail builders: > >1. Anyone else have an E-607PP trim tab spar that tapers faster than the >E-606PP trim spar in the elevator? The forward, outboard corner of my >tab is thinner by about 1/8" than the elevator where they 'meet'. > >2. The instructions on DWG 5 for assembling the elevator horn weldments >to the hor. stab. bearing say that you should use no more than 3 >AN960-416's on each side of the bearing. All the parts of my tail assy >have fit with the prepunched holes lining up properly, but I need at >least 4 AN960-416's & an AN960-416L on one side & at least an additional >AN960-416L on the other side to avoid stressing the other hinge >brackets. Did anyone else go with the obvious solution of more washers & >a longer bolt? > >Tip for those like me without a convenient lathe to make the bearing >drill bushing (for drilling the horn weldments): I found a nylon >standoff at the hardware store that was 1/4" outside & #4 screw size >inside. I used whatever size drill from my drill index that was a snug >fit in the standoff. > >Thanks, > >Charlie >(hoping my wing skins haven't turned to powder sitting in the boxes over >the last 5 months) > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 20, 2003
From: "Richard E. Tasker" <retasker(at)optonline.net>
Subject: Re: LED Warning Lamps
Actually the previous answer was more correct. Depending in the LED they run with a voltage of 1.6V (red) to more than 3V (green, white) across it. Most garden variety LEDs like working with 20mA of current. So, if we start with 14V (with the engine running) and are using a red LED, that gives us 12.4V to drop across a resistor so the LED doesn't burn up. 12.4V / 0.02 A = 620 ohms (which is conveniently a standard value). If you don't want the resistor to burn up you better get one with a 1/2 W power capability since the power across the resistor is 12.4V * 0.02A = 0.248W. If you use a standard 1/4 W resistor, it will be running quite hot. If the LED is used as a warning light (off most of the time) then the 1/4W resistor is probably okay. If the LED is on most or a significant amount of the time, then the 1/2 W is necessary. If you have any additional puzzlement, just email me. Dick Tasker, 90573 Fuselage kempthornes wrote: > > > >> >>All you need is a resistor to limit the current into the LED. Most leds >>require around 20 ma, so for 12 Volts at 20 ma try a 720 ohm resistor >>for about 16ma of current (E=IR or Volts = Current in Amps X Resistance >>in ohms) >> >> > >For sure all you need is a resistor, mine has been working for over 150 >hours now. > >What we need to limit is the voltage across the LED I think. More than >about 5V blow them away. Since the LED draws about 20ma as you say, and >this value is at 5V then the resistance of the LED is: > >E=IR 5 = 0.020 * R therefore R = 5 / 0.020 or 250 ohms > >the completed circuit, in order to drop to 5V should be > >E=IR 12 = 0.020 * (250 + R) therefore R = 350 --- I think I >used a 470 ohms but maybe I guessed! Maybe the resistor is in parallel. > >This email is about as useless as some of the dull witted humor we see on >the rvlist. Maybe we need electric bob? > >K. H. (Hal) Kempthorne >RV6-a N7HK - Three trips to OSH now. >PRB (El Paso de Robles, CA) > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "James E. Clark" <james(at)nextupventures.com>
Subject: Evaluation of ICOM IC-A200 Transceiver
Date: Nov 20, 2003
Does this mean that you have given up on the SL40? If so, why? It appears that they plan to keep it around for a while and it is a great radio. UPSAT/GARMIN-AT have made clear that the GX series is toast but as far as I can tell the SL40/30 is in good graces. Of course, I MAY BE WRONG. I do not have direct experience with the ICOM. Looked at it but concluded that the SL40 was better ... this was some time ago. James > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Joe & Jan > Connell > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 11:37 AM > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV-List: Evaluation of ICOM IC-A200 Transceiver > > > Gentlemen (and ladies too), > > I had decided to install a UPS SL40 in my VFR RV-9A until > the recent Garmin buyout. I'm now contemplating an ICOM > IC-A200 instead. In reviewing the archives, I'm found only 4 > postings. > > Do any of you have experience and comments about this radio? > > Thanks, > > Joe Connell RV-9A N95JJ (finishing kit stage) > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 19, 2003
From: Michael McGee <jmpcrftr(at)teleport.com>
Subject: Re: New anti-corrosion policy from Van's?
Kevin- Your time frame is similar to mine (storing and building). What is your serial number (builder number)? Also, when did you order and receive your wing kit? My tail and wing kit were over a year apart. The tail is done but I've yet to pull any plastic from the wing parts other than the rear spars. There have been a few parts where there were some spots under the plastic. Mike McGee 90221 At 12:02 2003-11-18, you wrote: > >Just got started on my wing kit and found that I will have to buy a >complete set of wing skins before I get started due to corrosion. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Roberto Giusti" <roby(at)mail.com>
Subject: F-821 Skin Fitting problem
Date: Nov 20, 2003
Listers, I am having a hard time installing the F-821 top front skin on my RV8 QB. If I align the top skin with the firewall the side edges don't end up parallel to the side skins (F-820). To get the sides parallel, the top skin needs to sit kind of crooked on the firewall (the front right corner about 1/8" forward and the front left corner 1/8" back). It will be difficult to rivet it to the firewall flange like this and it might create problems later when mounting the cowl (and it certainly doesn't look good!). Did anyone else come across this problem? Thanks, Roberto Giusti RV-8 QB Fuselage roby(at)mail.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Cockpit Lights
Date: Nov 20, 2003
From: "Stewart, Michael (ISS Atlanta)" <mstewart(at)iss.net>
JR mine are located, one on each side, on the slider rail support, just forward of the shoulder location. Good news is they light the panel very well. Bad news is that before my recent panel overhaul, I had 2 of 5 instruments lit from the instrument. Lit instruments are much easier to read than the flood lights. This looks and feels way better than the eyeball lights. But the eyeballs work just fine. Either get lit instruments or don't. But if you get some that are, and some that aren't, you will clearly see the difference and wish you had all your instruments lit internally. IT annoyed me for a long time. You can see exact locations of my eyeball lights here: http://www.mstewart.net/michael/rv/index.htm Select Finishing/interior. Mike 6A slider -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of J. R. Dial Subject: RV-List: Cockpit Lights I am going to use three or four of the little "eyeball" lights from VANS for interior and panel lighting and I was wondering if people that have used these before have any recommendations on mounting locations. It is an RV6 slider. (Close to finished) Thanks, Dick Dial = = = = ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 20, 2003
From: John Mcmahon <rv6(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Cockpit Lights
Dick Hope this helps John (RV6 near paint) GMC wrote: > > > I am going to use three or four of the little "eyeball" >lights from VANS for interior and panel lighting and I was wondering if >people that have used these before have any recommendations on mounting >locations. It is an RV6 slider. (Close to finished) > Thanks, > Dick Dial > > >Hi Dick > >Yes I like the eyeball lights, used three. Two on left side for flight >instruments, one on right side with Vans internally lighted engine >instruments. Left and right sides have separate rheostats. > >I located lights on forward side at base of roll bar on inside of the >reinforcement plate. >Made up a matching light mount plate and drilled/threaded flange of >reinforcement (front angle) for tiny screws to hold light mounting plate. > >With two lights close to flight instruments you can aim each at different >sections of panel and get good panel coverage, have no other RV to compare >it to but I would think that if the lights were further aft or mounted lower >they would light up too much area and cause distracting reflections. My >instrument panel is black semi gloss and reflections are very minimal. IMHO >it looks good and panel lighting is equivalent to or better than many >certified aircraft. > >Would I do it that way again? The right side light has packed it in >(wiring?) and will be repaired/replaced this weekend during annual >inspection, so next time I will put two lights on right side for >redundancy - same location. > > 6A slider - 220 hrs, about 6 at night - down for annual. > >George McNutt >Langley B.C > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Phil N" <pnewlon(at)toosan.com>
Subject: Cleated rivets - a record number?!
Date: Nov 20, 2003
I wonder what the record is for cleated rivets in a single part? Heh, heh..... Phil ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Pat Hatch" <pat_hatch(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Cockpit Lights
Date: Nov 20, 2003
Question for those who have used the eyeball lights...how well do you think they would work as map lights instead of instrument flood lights? Are they bright enough for this purpose do you think? Thanks. Pat Hatch RV-4 RV-6 RV-7 QB (Building) Vero Beach, FL ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stewart, Michael (ISS Atlanta)" <mstewart(at)iss.net> Subject: RE: RV-List: Cockpit Lights > > JR mine are located, one on each side, on the slider rail support, just > forward of the shoulder location. Good news is they light the panel very > well. Bad news is that before my recent panel overhaul, I had 2 of 5 > instruments lit from the instrument. Lit instruments are much easier to > read than the flood lights. This looks and feels way better than the > eyeball lights. But the eyeballs work just fine. Either get lit > instruments or don't. But if you get some that are, and some that > aren't, you will clearly see the difference and wish you had all your > instruments lit internally. > > IT annoyed me for a long time. > > You can see exact locations of my eyeball lights here: > http://www.mstewart.net/michael/rv/index.htm > Select Finishing/interior. > Mike > 6A slider > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of J. R. Dial > To: RV-List > Subject: RV-List: Cockpit Lights > > > I am going to use three or four of the little "eyeball" > lights from VANS for interior and panel lighting and I was wondering if > people that have used these before have any recommendations on mounting > locations. It is an RV6 slider. (Close to finished) > Thanks, > Dick Dial > > > > = > = > = > = > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Cup holders for RV-6(A)
Date: Nov 20, 2003
There is a brief flurry on Toyota cupholders in the archives back in '97. Anyone got any pictures of these things so I can see how bad I want one of these? Ralph Capen ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: New anti-corrosion policy from Van's?
Date: Nov 20, 2003
From: "Condrey, Bob (US SSA)" <bob.condrey(at)baesystems.com>
Not sure why my first post didn't work. I was trying to relate the specifics of the RV-10 manual reference for the plastic removal. It located in paragraph 5M and simply says that the vinyl should be removed within a few weeks because the adhesive strengthens with time. Bob -----Original Message----- From: John [mailto:n1cxo320(at)salidaco.com] Subject: Re: RV-List: New anti-corrosion policy from Van's? fL34M34r3-K9348hJNDU JSDMNF I couldn't agree more ! = direct advertising on the Matronics Forums. = = = ________________________________________________________________________________
From: BGCrook(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 20, 2003
Subject: Re: NEW PROJECT?
It's a single place moto-glider I believe. Bryon Crook RV-9A Emp. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 20, 2003
From: Kevin Behrent <kbehrent(at)cascadiasoftware.com>
Subject: Re: New anti-corrosion policy from Van's?
Mike, My serial # is 90126. I received my wing kit several weeks after my emp. I bought my kit when only the emp was available, but was early enough to get the wings as soon as they started shipping. My entire wing kit did not come all at once. If I recall, it took several seeks for all the bits and pieces to arrive. I would check those spots very closely. Some of my skins had what appeared to be little spots, hardly visible through the plastic, but when a scotch brite pad and a little alumiprep was applied, it not only was pitted, but in some cases a layer was removed and you can see the edges. Note, this was all done under the watchful eye of a FAA inspecter. This really raised his eyebrow! Michael McGee wrote: > > Kevin- > Your time frame is similar to mine (storing and building). What is your > serial number (builder number)? > > Also, when did you order and receive your wing kit? My tail and wing kit > were over a year apart. The tail is done but I've yet to pull any plastic > from the wing parts other than the rear spars. There have been a few parts > where there were some spots under the plastic. > > Mike McGee > 90221 > > At 12:02 2003-11-18, you wrote: > > > >Just got started on my wing kit and found that I will have to buy a > >complete set of wing skins before I get started due to corrosion. > -- Kevin Behrent Cascadia Software, Inc. 3600 Port of Tacoma Road Suite 210 Tacoma, WA 98424 Wrk: (253) 896-4000 x104 Fax: (253) 896-3680 kbehrent(at)cascadiasoftware.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ron Walker" <ron(at)walker.net>
Subject: Re: NEW PROJECT?
Date: Nov 20, 2003
Looks like they updated their web site already -- the RV11 is gonna be a motoglider! I was gonna suggest a 4 seat tandem aircraft muck like the relationship between the 7 and 8 ;o) Ron ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Knicholas2(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 20, 2003
Subject: Re: Cup holders for RV-6(A)
In a message dated 11/20/2003 6:32:30 AM Pacific Standard Time, recapen(at)earthlink.net writes: << There is a brief flurry on Toyota cupholders >> In my RV9A I built a center consule, similar to the one advertised on the Vans Airforce web site. I then made a trip to my local marine store and bought a removable, gimbled cup holder that screwed right onto the consule. Very cool. Kim Nicholas ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 20, 2003
From: Jim Oke <wjoke(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: New anti-corrosion policy from Van's?
Having read the various "my wing skins corroded under the plastic covering" horror stories over the past few days, one has to suspect there is dissimilar metal (or galvanic) action occurring to attack the alclad surface. Situations such as described below could reasonably be caused if flecks of foreign matter (such as iron filings or grit) became lodged in or under the plastic sheeting and the usual dissimilar metals exchange of electrons, etc. occurred to oxidize the surface. The plastic covering seems more to be put in place to prevent physical damage to the sheets (surface scratches from handling) rather than act as an impermeable membrane to keep moisture away from the surface. A small puncture cause by a piece of iron grit or similar would actually let moisture enter under the plastic which would then hold it in place against the alclad which would promote dissimilar metal effects. Parts that come without the covering would stay generally drier and simple handling would tend to remove any bits of foreign matter or shift them around on the surface. Introduction of foreign matter could occurred at the aluminums mill where the plastic covering was applied or during later handling or processing of the material. Unpacking wing skins and flopping them down on a workbench or shop floor contaminated by metal filings would be one way to cause this. Hopefully Vans has good house-keeping practices in place in their shop and storage facilities as well to prevent this sort of thing occurring. Looking at the problem from this standpoint, early removal of the plastic coating when inventorying a kit might be the best course of action. I used the soldering iron along the rivets lines technique myself and pulled the bulk of the plastic just before scotchbriting and painting my -6A, a complication I should probably have skipped. The plastic was on my wing skins for about three years with no noticeable ill effects. A close metallurgical analysis of some of the damaged sheets should be able to determine the cause. Hopefully if Vans can get hold of some samples this can be sorted out. Jim Oke RV-6A C-GKGZ Winnipeg, MB ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Behrent" <kbehrent(at)cascadiasoftware.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: New anti-corrosion policy from Van's? > > Mike, > > My serial # is 90126. I received my wing kit several weeks after my emp. I > bought my kit when only the emp was available, but was early enough to get the > wings as soon as they started shipping. My entire wing kit did not come all at > once. If I recall, it took several seeks for all the bits and pieces to arrive. > > I would check those spots very closely. Some of my skins had what appeared to be > little spots, hardly visible through the plastic, but when a scotch brite pad and > a little alumiprep was applied, it not only was pitted, but in some cases a layer > was removed and you can see the edges. Note, this was all done under the watchful > eye of a FAA inspecter. This really raised his eyebrow! > > Michael McGee wrote: > > > > > Kevin- > > Your time frame is similar to mine (storing and building). What is your > > serial number (builder number)? > > > > Also, when did you order and receive your wing kit? My tail and wing kit > > were over a year apart. The tail is done but I've yet to pull any plastic > > from the wing parts other than the rear spars. There have been a few parts > > where there were some spots under the plastic. > > > > Mike McGee > > 90221 > > > > At 12:02 2003-11-18, you wrote: > > > > > >Just got started on my wing kit and found that I will have to buy a > > >complete set of wing skins before I get started due to corrosion. > > > > -- > Kevin Behrent > Cascadia Software, Inc. > 3600 Port of Tacoma Road > Suite 210 > Tacoma, WA 98424 > Wrk: (253) 896-4000 x104 > Fax: (253) 896-3680 > kbehrent(at)cascadiasoftware.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 20, 2003
From: Charles Brame <charleyb(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Air/Oil Separator location
I plan to install an air/oil separator on my RV-6A firewall and drain the separator into a small removable container. I want to put the separator near the bottom of the firewall with enough space to put the drain container below the separator. Does it matter where the separator is located (high or low) with regard to the crankcase vent exit which is high on the rear of the engine? Charlie Brame RV-6A N11CB San Antonio ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "McFarland, Randy" <Randy.McFarland(at)novellus.com>
Subject: First flight decisons
Date: Nov 20, 2003
Does this caution apply to engines that are run in to some extent at the factory? Thx for the word of caution, I had not read that anywhere. R -----Original Message----- From: Eustace Bowhay [mailto:ebowhay(at)jetstream.net] Subject: RV-List: First flight decisons In addition to all that has been said on this subject one of the most important items is the engine. If one is starting with a new or overhauled engine it is critical that ground running be kept to an absolute minimum. For me this would be a start-up and checking for any snags, clearing the snags if any then out to the runway and gone. The reason for this is the engine needs to be run at power settings high enough to seat the rings like 75% in cruise until the oil consumption stabilizes. Taxiing and running up and down the runway will glaze the cylinders and you will have a oil burner with the only cure being to pull the cylinders and deglaze and new rings. This mean that the first flight should be done by someone that is current on the RV and needs no practicing on the ground. Not trying to discourage anyone from doing the first flight but you have to be honest with yourself and ask if your prepared to go under these conditions. Eustace Bowhay Blind Bay, B.C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "LarryRobertHelming" <lhelming(at)sigecom.net>
Subject: Re: 4130 parts showing rust through primer
Date: Nov 20, 2003
Seems that neither Home Depot and Lowes Hardware have a product called Ospho. Where did you buy it Linn? Indiana Larry, RV7 Tip-up TMX-O-360 ACS2002 Dynon CNS430 Digitrak On Finish Kit ----- Original Message ----- From: "linn walters" <lwalters2(at)cfl.rr.com> Subject: Re: RV-List: 4130 parts showing rust through primer > > Steven Eberhart wrote: > > > > >THe plane is an RV-8 that was delivered before Van's switched to powder > >coating the 4130 steel parts. We have had to clean up rust that was > >starting to show through the elevator and rudder brackets. It was like > >the primer was porous and didn't seal against moisture. The paint used > >was RM DP-40. THere seems to be a distinct difference between the RM DP > >primer and the PPG DP primer. I cleaned up the rust with a wire wheel > >on the Dremel and primed with NAPA rattle can self etching primer and > >then everything was primed with the same PPG DP-40LF that the entire > >plane was primed with. Color coats were PPG Concept. > > > >Steve Eberhart > >Finishing up the paint job on RV-8 N49KS and building RV-7A N14SE > > > Well, I think I got it right. Preparation. Here's what I do, and it > seems to work in the FL humidity. > 1. Buy some Ospho from your local hardware store. > 2. Let the steel get a little surface rust. Ospho works best when there > isn't shiny steel. No, I don't know why. > 3. Brush on the Ospho. If you HAVE to spray it, do so in well > ventilated area and wear a RESPIRATOR. Not a paper mask. > 4. Let it dry over a day or so. It will look real ugly with rough > black crap all over it. Lightly sand off the ugly black crap. > 5. Repeat step 3. > 6. If you get more ugly black crap, do step 4. If not prime with paint > of your choice. > > Ospho has acid in it (phosphoric, I think .... read the label. Well, > read it anyway. It also has a dissoved plastic in it that will coat and > seal the steel. the plastic is not durable so you must prime. > > Now, for what Steve's problem was. He's right. Primer is porous. It > serves as a base to help make paint stick better. Paint doesn't stick > to bare metal very well, and primer doesn't keep the moisture out. > Together, however, they're a real good team. Steve didn't get the paint > on soon enough. Been there, done that, and stripped it all off to start > over. If you just try and kill the rust and paint over it though, it > will come back later on. > > No, I'm not a paint expert, and don't play one on TV, but I've painted > enough to know what has worked for me in the past. Ospho will also work > on aluminum. I have test pieces 20 years old with good paint still on it. > > I also caution against mixing types of primer and paint. If you're > going to use urethane paint, use urethane primer. Same with acrylic and > the other flavors. > > Hope this helps! > Linn Walters > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Coers, John" <John.Coers(at)fkilogistex.com>
Subject: Anti corrosion policy from Vans
Date: Nov 20, 2003
Perhaps I'm losing it, but I can't get past the issue of corrosion under the plastic on new parts. For about three months now, I have had 3 pieces of scrap laying in the bed of my pickup truck in an attempt to win an argument with Jim Sears. I coated one piece of scrap with Zinc Chromate, another piece with Napa Zincrom and the third piece was left bare. Not only have I not found any corrosion on the coated pieces, but the bare piece looks just fine as well. I don't understand how aluminum covered with the vinyl from Vans could start corroding while sitting on a shelf awaiting use. Perhaps if the shelf it was sitting on was made of salt and the air was 90% saturated then perhaps I could see it. But, I'm having trouble seeing covered aluminum corroding when you can go to your local airport and see bare aluminum aircraft sitting there doing just fine. The only way I can see corrosion on new plastic covered skins would be for the skins to be covered in plastic while wet, even then the alclad should have protected them. My biggest concern right now is that I'm about to receive my wing kit and I'm trying to figure out what I should do for storage. Plastic - on or off? John Coers 90780 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Wheeler North <wnorth(at)sdccd.cc.ca.us>
Subject: metal inner cooling plenum
Date: Nov 20, 2003
1) Would you do it again? Yes 2) Notice better cooling? Not so much but I never ran without it. I can now run the engine without cowl, I have no upwards load on the cowl system and the cowl is much easier to get on and off as my inlet gap seals do not overlap, they edge butt to adaptors I made attached to the plenum. The key is to not lose volume, ie get the lid close to the inside of the top cowl as this reservoir needs to be as big as possible. 3) Increased speed? Won't effect speed unless you change the inlets ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 20, 2003
From: kempthornes <kempthornes(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Keep building WAS: New Anti-Corrosion Policy from Van's
> >I decided to devote my time to building the airplane................ Best advice to first time builders is to concentrate on building the airplane. Craftsmanship, certainly but don't get so distracted that you don't ever have a first flight! Get to work! K. H. (Hal) Kempthorne RV6-a N7HK - Three trips to OSH now. PRB (El Paso de Robles, CA) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Glenn S. Gordon" <ggordon(at)psiatms.com>
Subject: Hotel available for Kittyhawk 2003 Centennial Celebrations.
Date: Nov 20, 2003
Please contact me if you would like more information on the hotel room I have available. -Glenn Gordon ggordon(at)psiatms.com 847-955-0095 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 20, 2003
From: kempthornes <kempthornes(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: 4130 parts showing rust through primer
> > Paint doesn't stick > > to bare metal very well unless you spill some on the metal! I sprayed some Cessna orange paint on a spot (bare aluminum) on my RV6a and had a hell of a time getting it back off. It even resisted paint remover. hal ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Phil N" <pnewlon(at)toosan.com>
Subject: 4130 parts showing rust through primer
Date: Nov 20, 2003
The DoitBest hardware store carries it: http://doitbest.com/shop/dept.asp?paging_code=4&dept_id=3622 More data at: http://www.ospho.com/ Here's the description from their website. OSPHO Rust Primer (Skybryte) A metal treatment or primer that converts rust to an inert, hard substance that can be painted. Also can be used on new or clean metal to make subsequent paint coatings more effective in controlling rust. Recommended for use under oil-base primers and paints. Test a small area before using under epoxy or latex paints. Equally effective for exterior and interior work. Covers approximately 600 sq. ft. per gallon and normally requires overnight drying before topcoating. Contains phosphoric acid. Brushes and spray equipment can be cleaned with water. Avoid spreading OSPHO on adjacent areas such as painted surfaces, concrete, masonry, and stonework. If splashing occurs, flush immediately with water. Available in quart or gallon. Phil > Seems that neither Home Depot and Lowes Hardware have a > product called Ospho. Where did you buy it Linn? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 20, 2003
From: Gene Gottschalk <geneg(at)sled.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: Anti corrosion policy from Vans
I've seen several pieces corrode sitting on the shelf waiting for me to get to 'em. Don't know why, just that they did. After that I stripped all the plastic off. Haven't seen it since. Gene Gottschalk RV-6A N700RV > >Perhaps I'm losing it, but I can't get past the issue of corrosion under the >plastic on new parts. For about three months now, I have had 3 pieces of >scrap laying in the bed of my pickup truck in an attempt to win an argument >with Jim Sears. I coated one piece of scrap with Zinc Chromate, another >piece with Napa Zincrom and the third piece was left bare. Not only have I >not found any corrosion on the coated pieces, but the bare piece looks just >fine as well. I don't understand how aluminum covered with the vinyl from >Vans could start corroding while sitting on a shelf awaiting use. Perhaps if >the shelf it was sitting on was made of salt and the air was 90% saturated >then perhaps I could see it. But, I'm having trouble seeing covered aluminum >corroding when you can go to your local airport and see bare aluminum >aircraft sitting there doing just fine. The only way I can see corrosion on >new plastic covered skins would be for the skins to be covered in plastic >while wet, even then the alclad should have protected them. My biggest >concern right now is that I'm about to receive my wing kit and I'm trying to >figure out what I should do for storage. Plastic - on or off? > >John Coers >90780 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 20, 2003
From: Charlie & Tupper England <cengland(at)netdoor.com>
Subject: Re: RV-7 E-607PP, E-606PP, & elevator center pivot assembly
Dana Overall wrote: > > > >>From: Charlie & Tupper England <cengland(at)netdoor.com> >>Questions for you -7 & -8 fully prepunched tail builders: >> >>1. Anyone else have an E-607PP trim tab spar that tapers faster than the >>E-606PP trim spar in the elevator? The forward, outboard corner of my >>tab is thinner by about 1/8" than the elevator where they 'meet'. >> >> >> > >I certainly did not have that issue you envision. I'm betting the >difference lies in the fact those two spars do not touch one another as the >rivet lines in final assembly are actually 3/4" apart with one facing aft >and one facing forward. > snipped Dana Overall Understand that the spars aren't the same height. But in my case, the trim tab thickness on the outboard end (~midpoint of the elevator), where it is adjacent to the elevator, is tapered at a different rate from trailing edge to the spar. My elevator is about 1/8" thicker than the trim tab at that distance from the trailing edge. Charlie ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Elsa & Henry" <elsa-henry@darlor-watch.com>
Subject: New Anti-Corrosion Policy from Van's
Date: Nov 20, 2003
> > What worked for me was to use a small light soldering iron with a round > point. I polished the tip then marked the plastic using a metal straight > edge as a guide. The secret seems to be in the speed you move the iron along > the plastic, I found that you don't want to melt through to the metal just > score the plastic.I run two lines about an inch apart, sometimes the score > marks are not quite deep enough and the plastic will start to tear, in this > case just go back with the iron an lightly score again. This has worked well > for me, no marks on the metal. > > I like to leave the plastic on to prevent scratches during the long building > process. > > Eustace Bowhay Blind Bay,B.C. That's exactly what I did! I used my temperature controlled soldering station with the round tip. I practiced on the scrap pieces that were packed in the kit to get the right technique. and it worked fine,-no scratches. My skins had the white plastic that "sticks like s**t to a blanket" and required much "elbow grease" to remove the adhesive residue after getting the stuff off. One hell-of-a-job! Cheers!!----Henry Hore ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "lucky macy" <luckymacy(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: 4130 parts showing rust through primer
Date: Nov 20, 2003
When I owned a boat I used it on stainless steel parts like hand rails and bought the stuff at West Marine. Little goes a long way. >From: "LarryRobertHelming" <lhelming(at)sigecom.net> >Reply-To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: Re: RV-List: 4130 parts showing rust through primer >Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:53:10 -0500 > > >Seems that neither Home Depot and Lowes Hardware have a product called >Ospho. Where did you buy it Linn? > >Indiana Larry, RV7 Tip-up TMX-O-360 ACS2002 Dynon CNS430 Digitrak >On Finish Kit > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "linn walters" <lwalters2(at)cfl.rr.com> >To: >Subject: Re: RV-List: 4130 parts showing rust through primer > > > > > > Steven Eberhart wrote: > > > > > > > >THe plane is an RV-8 that was delivered before Van's switched to powder > > >coating the 4130 steel parts. We have had to clean up rust that was > > >starting to show through the elevator and rudder brackets. It was like > > >the primer was porous and didn't seal against moisture. The paint used > > >was RM DP-40. THere seems to be a distinct difference between the RM >DP > > >primer and the PPG DP primer. I cleaned up the rust with a wire wheel > > >on the Dremel and primed with NAPA rattle can self etching primer and > > >then everything was primed with the same PPG DP-40LF that the entire > > >plane was primed with. Color coats were PPG Concept. > > > > > >Steve Eberhart > > >Finishing up the paint job on RV-8 N49KS and building RV-7A N14SE > > > > > Well, I think I got it right. Preparation. Here's what I do, and it > > seems to work in the FL humidity. > > 1. Buy some Ospho from your local hardware store. > > 2. Let the steel get a little surface rust. Ospho works best when there > > isn't shiny steel. No, I don't know why. > > 3. Brush on the Ospho. If you HAVE to spray it, do so in well > > ventilated area and wear a RESPIRATOR. Not a paper mask. > > 4. Let it dry over a day or so. It will look real ugly with rough > > black crap all over it. Lightly sand off the ugly black crap. > > 5. Repeat step 3. > > 6. If you get more ugly black crap, do step 4. If not prime with paint > > of your choice. > > > > Ospho has acid in it (phosphoric, I think .... read the label. Well, > > read it anyway. It also has a dissoved plastic in it that will coat and > > seal the steel. the plastic is not durable so you must prime. > > > > Now, for what Steve's problem was. He's right. Primer is porous. It > > serves as a base to help make paint stick better. Paint doesn't stick > > to bare metal very well, and primer doesn't keep the moisture out. > > Together, however, they're a real good team. Steve didn't get the paint > > on soon enough. Been there, done that, and stripped it all off to start > > over. If you just try and kill the rust and paint over it though, it > > will come back later on. > > > > No, I'm not a paint expert, and don't play one on TV, but I've painted > > enough to know what has worked for me in the past. Ospho will also work > > on aluminum. I have test pieces 20 years old with good paint still on >it. > > > > I also caution against mixing types of primer and paint. If you're > > going to use urethane paint, use urethane primer. Same with acrylic and > > the other flavors. > > > > Hope this helps! > > Linn Walters > > > > > > Is there a gadget-lover on your gift list? MSN Shopping has lined up some good bets! http://shopping.msn.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Wheeler North <wnorth(at)sdccd.cc.ca.us>
"'mrobert569(at)hotmail.com'"
Subject: FARs Question for Das Fed
Date: Nov 20, 2003
Mike, We have been having an interpretive discussion in our dept about Exp built record keeping and who can do the maintenance. The first issue is that Part 43.1B excludes Exp from this part, but paragraphs or verbiage of Part 43 are referenced by Part 91. In particular 91.405 and 91.407 reference specific paragraphs of Part 43 by requiring the owner to maintain records and do not allow for continued operations unless record entries are made after maintenance is done in accordance with those paragraphs in Part 43. So the question is, does the Part 43.1B exclusion override the Part 91 specific references to part 43 paragraphs, or does the Part 91 claims to "any aircraft" override the 43.1B exclusion in those specific references. To me this seems purely interpretive on the part of the FAA, but I believe that Part 91 overrides the 43.1B exclusion given that the exclusion only excludes the part as a whole but makes no attempt to exclude references to chunks of the part by other parts. The other question is who can do the work and return the Exp aircraft back to service particularly when the original builder is no longer in the picture. This sort of falls under 91.403 which says nobody can do the work on an aircraft unless they are included (listed) in that subpart (E) or other applicable parts including 43. Well 43 is the only place that lets an A&P or anybody else do the work, but if 43 is excluded from this for EXP's by 43.1B, then nobody can do the work. And the rest of Part 91 Subpart E doesn't really list anybody else who can do this work except for a few places where it allows for the manufacturer to do things like a transponder check (91.413 C 3). So in this case 43 must be included or nobody can do the work, yet if it is then A&Ps must be in the picture for any maintenance done beyond PM on an EXP. Now I've never explored this because I've always been an A&P or the manufacturer, but I have a number of associates who are second owners who are not really following these requirements, particularly the record keeping. Certainly its reasonable to allow the manufacturer to maintain the aircraft even though the regs don't clearly indicate this, but a second owner could be a mere pilot with no skills at anything other than flying. I wouldn't want to be a passenger in an aircraft being maintained by someone of such limited stature. I guess I personally don't really care much, but I do believe that they are wasting their money on insurance as their aircraft are legally not airworthy as per these regs if they maintain or alter it. It seems like I am missing something here, or this is just being look at from afar as being beyond the current scope of the FAA. Any of your wisdom or thoughts would be appreciated, although I fully understand that Ms. Blakely's word is the only thing that really matters. ;{) Wheeler ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 20, 2003
From: Bill Dube <bdube(at)al.noaa.gov>
Subject: Re: LED Warning Lamps
> >Disclaimer - I have searched the archives > >I plan on using some small LED's as and enunciator panel for such things >as low fuel, starter engaged, low volt, etc. I bought some neat little >led's from mouser and the other night I wanted to see how bright they >were. Well, I'm here to tell ya their real bright for a nanosecond when >12 volts is applied. It's important to dim the warning lights when operating at night. An LED that shows nicely in daylight will nearly blind you at night. There are a bunch of ways to do this, but it must be done somehow. The brightness of an LED is directly proportional to the current flowing through it. The voltage across the LED is only very loosely associated with the brightness, so you are pretty much forced to dim the LED by controlling the current, rather than the voltage. You typically operate an LED on 12 volts by installing a series resistor to limit the current. As has been noted by others, the typical current is 20 mA, so you pick a resistor using Ohm's law to deliver that current. To make the LEDs dimmer, you must reduce the current. In a warning light, you want the circuit that does this to be as reliable as possible. You can reduce the current by either increasing the series resistance or by reducing the voltage that feeds the series resistor. Increasing the series resistance would likely be the simplest and most reliable. Some sort of "day/night" switch would probably be adequate. You could put two resistors in series on each warning light. You would then put a small diode at the connection between each of these series resistors. You would then connect the free end of each of these diodes to a "bypass" switch. The other terminal of the switch would be connected to plus 12 volts. When you close the bypass switch, it would cut out (bypass) one of the series resistors and make the LEDs brighter. When you open the switch, current would have to flow through both of the resistors and the light would be dim. Plus 12 V --------/\/\/\/\-------------o----/\/\/\/\-----(LED1) ---- ground ! ! Plus 12 V ---(switch)----o----!