RV-Archive.digest.vol-vq

December 29, 2012 - May 10, 2013



From: Robert Savage <bsavage22(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Countersink Bit for 4-40 Screw
Date: Dec 29, 2012
Here's a link to Cleveland Tool and their kit for wing tip attachment. I used this kit and their dimple die for the wing aluminum. I used a hand tool for countersinking the fiberglass. It is pricey though and time consuming but the result was very nice. I also used their #4 nutplate jig. http://www.cleavelandtool.com/prodinfo.asp?number=WHS220#.UN-WVKywXTo Bob From: sheldonb(at)frontiernet.net Subject: Re: RV-List: Countersink Bit for 4-40 Screw Date: Sat=2C 29 Dec 2012 17:57:28 -0700 I used 4-40s' on the tips (the kit came with the countersink) but I forgot who supplied the kit... But it was for wingtip install... However=2C I agree=2C use 6-32's instead... Sheldon ----- Original Message ----- From: Warren Brecheisen To: rv-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Saturday=2C December 29=2C 2012 5:44 PM Subject: RE: RV-List: Countersink Bit for 4-40 Screw I ran into this a couple of times on my -6. I simply used a pilotless countersink with the correct angle. I used a hand hole deburring tool that accepts tools with the =BC-20 thre ad (same as microstops). I went slowly and carefully=2C checking the result often and making corrections as I went. I did not use any 4-40 screws on structural components. If you are using them on your wings tips=2C my method is probably too labor intensive to complete in a reasonable amount of time. I used 6-32=92s on the tips. Warren href="http://www.aeroelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com href="http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/chr ef="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List">http://www.matronics.com/ Navigator?RV-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 29, 2012
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Matt's RV-8 Rebuild...
Dear fellow RV Builders and Flyers, I've been working hard on the RV-8 rebuild over the holidays and thought I'd share. Here the current status as of December 28 2012 on the new RV-8 2.0. This quick video highlights the new instrument panel including the recently finished cockpit audio output for the video camera. Line level output from the airplane's intercom is routed out through the RCA outputs in the rear of the cabin through some matching circuitry in the gold RCA connectors up to the camera's Mic input. The matching seems to be working pretty well. The audio in the video is coming right from the intercom and includes a mix of the intercom voice, the music or DVD output from the Kenwood stereo, and the audio output from the Garmin SL-30 Com unit (aircraft communications radio). Yet to be wired in is the audio outputs from the EFIS's, the VP-200, and the ADS600B. Note also that the video output from the camera is also routed in though the new A/V panel and then out through the headrest LCD display for the passenger. The video is also available on the pilot's Kenwood display. Everything is working pretty nicely. I'm particularly pleased with the new A/V panel I/O. Matt's HD YouTube Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xrTKAuDEyI&feature=share&list=PLB2F39639392A90DE - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 120+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 29, 2012
From: Viorel Nichols <viorel.nichols(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Auto-response
Away on holiday from the 22 December 2012 till 29 January 2013 Wishing you a happy festive season . Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year from Viorel ... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 30, 2012
From: Garey Wittich <gareywittich2000(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Looking for Countersink for 4-40 Screws that allows "tapping"
for screw threads I posed the original question. -The 4-40 screws I will be using (MS24693 formerly AN507) have the 100 Degree angle just like the the AN426AD rivets. -The -Countersink I am looking for needs to have a 100 degree angle an d have a 0.089" Diameter Guide Pin so the 0.089 Dia hole in the material ca n be "Tapped" for the 4-40 screw threads after countersinking. -Using a 1 00 Degree Deburring Tool Bit will be too time consuming because of the numb er of screws used. -Using #6 Screws or larger will be a problem. - Usin g the Countersink made by Cleveland for 4-40 screws has too big a diameter Guide Pin. - Any ideas where to get the above Countersink (100 Degree Ang le and 0.089" Dia Guide Pin) ?? -Many thanks, -Garey Wittich ________________________________________________________________________________
From: John Danielson <johnd(at)wlcwyo.com>
Date: Dec 31, 2012
Subject: Re: Looking for Countersink for 4-40 Screws that allows "tapping"
for screw threads Where are these #4's being used? Sent from Samsung Mobile Garey Wittich wrote: I posed the original question. The 4-40 screws I will be using (MS24693 fo rmerly AN507) have the 100 Degree angle just like the the AN426AD rivets. The Countersink I am looking for needs to have a 100 degree angle and have a 0.089" Diameter Guide Pin so the 0.089 Dia hole in the material can be " Tapped" for the 4-40 screw threads after countersinking. Using a 100 Degre e Deburring Tool Bit will be too time consuming because of the number of sc rews used. Using #6 Screws or larger will be a problem. Using the Counte rsink made by Cleveland for 4-40 screws has too big a diameter Guide Pin. Any ideas where to get the above Countersink (100 Degree Angle and 0.089" Dia Guide Pin) ?? Many thanks, Garey Wittich rsbooks.com> m> ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Warren Brecheisen" <n146wb(at)cfu.net>
Subject: Looking for Countersink for 4-40 Screws that allows "tapping"
for screw threads
Date: Dec 31, 2012
The only 100 degree countersinks I've run across that are even close to .089 are for #40 drill bit holes. Warren ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Hopperdhh(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 31, 2012
Subject: Re: Looking for Countersink for 4-40 Screws that allows "tapping"
f... Why not drill the holes first with #40 then countersink and then enlarge to .089? Dan Hopper RV-7A Flying since 2004 In a message dated 12/31/2012 4:46:47 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, n146wb(at)cfu.net writes: The only 100 degree countersinks I=99ve run across that are even clo se to .089 are for #40 drill bit holes. Warren (http://www.aeroelectric.com/) (http://www.buildersbooks.com/) (http://www.homebuilthelp.com/) (http://www.matronics.com/contribution) (http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Hopperdhh(at)aol.com
Date: Dec 31, 2012
Subject: Re: Looking for Countersink for 4-40 Screws that allows "tapping"
f... I know this has come up before, but my #40 countersink is undercut enough that it could be turned down to .089 and still cut at the root. That's only .009 to go from .098 to .089. That's only .0045 off the surface. Dan In a message dated 12/31/2012 4:46:47 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, n146wb(at)cfu.net writes: The only 100 degree countersinks I=99ve run across that are even clo se to .089 are for #40 drill bit holes. Warren (http://www.aeroelectric.com/) (http://www.buildersbooks.com/) (http://www.homebuilthelp.com/) (http://www.matronics.com/contribution) (http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 01, 2013
From: Carl Raichle <carlrai(at)aol.com>
Subject: Stay in touch with me through LinkedIn
LinkedIn ------------ I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. - Carl Carl Raichle National Training and Quality Manager at Vitality Foodservice, Inc. Miami/Fort Lauderdale Area Confirm that you know Carl Raichle: https://www.linkedin.com/e/-74up5n-hbf3k5ff-12/isd/10239802752/ArmrZoOP/?hs=false&tok=1oyvOKjwe07lA1 -- You are receiving Invitation to Connect emails. Click to unsubscribe: http://www.linkedin.com/e/-74up5n-hbf3k5ff-12/ku39PTJTA_8a_FwQkuHcae07A_ZAqpmckdEc35oLUaM/goo/rv-list-digest%40matronics%2Ecom/20061/I3406382996_1/?hs=false&tok=11mlIc2QS07lA1 (c) 2012 LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 03, 2013
From: Brett Herrick <first_flights(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: RV-6A Project for Sale
QuickBuild Kit =93 Tail, Wings and Fuselage are complete.=C2- All p arts are primed.=C2- Built by licensed engineer.=C2- Wings have Whelen A600 strobe/position lights, landing and taxi lights installed.=C2- Elect ric flaps, elevator trim and aileron trim installed.=C2- Van=99s Fi nish and Firewall Forward kits are being installed.=C2- It is ready to in stall the panel, interior and engine of your choice.=C2- =0A=C2-=0AFor more details, please view the Display Specs Page and pictures on Barnstorme rs.com=0A=C2-=0ABrett Herrick=0AColumbus, Indiana ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 03, 2013
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: All New RV-14 List At Matronics!
Dear RV'rs, I've just setup an all new RV-14 email list and forum on the Matronics servers. Please surf over and register for and email account and access to the Forums. To get email distribution, sign up here: http://www.matronics.com/subscribe and to view the new RV-14 forum directly go here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewforum.php?f=79 Enjoy! Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 129+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "charlie" <cheathco(at)cox.net>
Subject: AOA units
Date: Jan 04, 2013
I was reading about an AOA that seems easier to install and not terribly expensive. I would like to hear from those of you (if any) who have an AOA in your plane. How useful? Any Caveats? Thanks, Charlie ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: LASAR 500 Hour inspection Requirement
From: "Edwardoc" <Rv8tor(at)mac.com>
Date: Jan 04, 2013
I have 478 hours on my LASAR system at present and it has performed as advertised. My last contact with Champion indicated is was pretty expensive for them to tear down inspect and replace as necessary. Any experience out there with inspections/repairs to the LASAR mags for the 500 hour inspection? I was told the most critical thing was to get the Impulse coupler (Called the Bush Kit) inspected as it is on the internal engine side of the housing and if it comes apart, it can spread metal all through the engine and some of the clearances are critical on the coupler. I believe it is a standard Coupler and would like to just get it inspected and repaired as necessary and leave the rest of the mag alone as long as they are working fine or just have someone who repairs Mags inspect the hardware and leave the electronics as is. Any inputs appreciated. 8) Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=391598#391598 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 04, 2013
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: LASAR 500 Hour inspection Requirement
Interested also as I have these on my 6A...except without the bush kit. I am quite happy with their performance so far... Ralph RV6A N822AR "Patience" @ N06 -----Original Message----- >From: Edwardoc <Rv8tor(at)mac.com> >Sent: Jan 4, 2013 9:35 AM >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV-List: LASAR 500 Hour inspection Requirement > > >I have 478 hours on my LASAR system at present and it has performed as advertised. My last contact with Champion indicated is was pretty expensive for them to tear down inspect and replace as necessary. Any experience out there with inspections/repairs to the LASAR mags for the 500 hour inspection? I was told the most critical thing was to get the Impulse coupler (Called the Bush Kit) inspected as it is on the internal engine side of the housing and if it comes apart, it can spread metal all through the engine and some of the clearances are critical on the coupler. >I believe it is a standard Coupler and would like to just get it inspected and repaired as necessary and leave the rest of the mag alone as long as they are working fine or just have someone who repairs Mags inspect the hardware and leave the electronics as is. >Any inputs appreciated. 8) > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=391598#391598 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich(at)verizon.net>
Subject: AOA units
Date: Jan 04, 2013
I have 10 years in the RV-8A and never found a need for AOA ' the airplane provides a lot of feedback on high attack angles. I do however have AOA in the RV-10. This was a no cost extra from having the Dynon SkyView system with the Dynon heated pitot tube. The AOA works fine and the install is little more than running two =BC=94 poly tubes to the pitot instead of one. The AOA calibration is straight forward and accurate. Other than eliminating the need to install the Van=92s Stall Warning in the wing (the AOA provides auditable tone in the headset when approaching stall) I find I have little use for the function ' but since it was free I=92m happy. Carl From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of charlie Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 9:30 AM Subject: RV-List: AOA units I was reading about an AOA that seems easier to install and not terribly expensive. I would like to hear from those of you (if any) who have an AOA in your plane. How useful? Any Caveats? Thanks, Charlie ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 04, 2013
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: LASAR 500 Hour inspection Requirement
Do you have a copy of the F-1100 Slick Master Service Manual and the L-1500 LASAR Ignition System Master Service Manual? I am looking for these also as they should answer the questions that you have posed. -----Original Message----- >From: Edwardoc <Rv8tor(at)mac.com> >Sent: Jan 4, 2013 9:35 AM >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV-List: LASAR 500 Hour inspection Requirement > > >I have 478 hours on my LASAR system at present and it has performed as advertised. My last contact with Champion indicated is was pretty expensive for them to tear down inspect and replace as necessary. Any experience out there with inspections/repairs to the LASAR mags for the 500 hour inspection? I was told the most critical thing was to get the Impulse coupler (Called the Bush Kit) inspected as it is on the internal engine side of the housing and if it comes apart, it can spread metal all through the engine and some of the clearances are critical on the coupler. >I believe it is a standard Coupler and would like to just get it inspected and repaired as necessary and leave the rest of the mag alone as long as they are working fine or just have someone who repairs Mags inspect the hardware and leave the electronics as is. >Any inputs appreciated. 8) > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=391598#391598 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: LASAR 500 Hour inspection Requirement
From: "Edwardoc" <Rv8tor(at)mac.com>
Date: Jan 04, 2013
I do not have those manuals. All I have is the install manual which has an inspection/overhaul requirement at 500 hour intervals. I am hoping there is someone who had the inspection done out there who can shed some information on it. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=391605#391605 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 04, 2013
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: LASAR 500 Hour inspection Requirement
So, I'm a few hundred flight hours behind you..... -----Original Message----- >From: Edwardoc <Rv8tor(at)mac.com> >Sent: Jan 4, 2013 10:20 AM >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV-List: Re: LASAR 500 Hour inspection Requirement > > >I do not have those manuals. All I have is the install manual which has an inspection/overhaul requirement at 500 hour intervals. I am hoping there is someone who had the inspection done out there who can shed some information on it. > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=391605#391605 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6 Flyer <rv6_flyer(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: LASAR 500 Hour inspection Requirement
Date: Jan 04, 2013
http://www.championaerospace.com/support/technical-publications/ They are expensive IMHO. Gary A. Sobek "My Sanity" RV-6 N157GS O-320 Hartzell=2C 2=2C672+ Flying Hours So. CA=2C USA > Date: Fri=2C 4 Jan 2013 10:43:53 -0500 > From: recapen(at)earthlink.net > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: Re: LASAR 500 Hour inspection Requirement > > > > So=2C I'm a few hundred flight hours behind you..... > > -----Original Message----- > >From: Edwardoc <Rv8tor(at)mac.com> > >Sent: Jan 4=2C 2013 10:20 AM > >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > >Subject: RV-List: Re: LASAR 500 Hour inspection Requirement > > > > > >I do not have those manuals. All I have is the install manual which has an inspection/overhaul requirement at 500 hour intervals. I am hoping the re is someone who had the inspection done out there who can shed some infor mation on it. > > > > > > > > > >Read this topic online here: > > > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=391605#391605 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: LASAR 500 Hour inspection Requirement
Date: Jan 05, 2013
Wow you are correct - gotta find someone that has a set and borrow them for a case of beer... From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV6 Flyer Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 11:44 AM Subject: RE: RV-List: Re: LASAR 500 Hour inspection Requirement http://www.championaerospace.com/support/technical-publications/ They are expensive IMHO. Gary A. Sobek "My Sanity" RV-6 N157GS O-320 Hartzell, 2,672+ Flying Hours So. CA, USA > Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 10:43:53 -0500 > From: recapen(at)earthlink.net > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: Re: LASAR 500 Hour inspection Requirement > > > > So, I'm a few hundred flight hours behind you..... > > -----Original Message----- > >From: Edwardoc <Rv8tor(at)mac.com> > >Sent: Jan 4, 2013 10:20 AM > >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > >Subject: RV-List: Re: LASAR 500 Hour inspection Requirement > > > > > >I do not have those manuals. All I have is the install manual which has an inspection/overhaul requirement at 500 hour intervals. I am hoping there is someone who had the inspection done out there who can shed some information on it. > > > > > > > > > >Read this topic online here: > > > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=391605#391605 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: SLICK / LASAR manuals
Date: Jan 05, 2013
Does anyone have an electronic copy of the F-1100 Slick Master Service Manual (not just the index) and the L-1500 LASAR Ignition System Master Service Manual? Would like to borrow and figure out the 500 hour rebuild requirement.. Ralph Capen ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 05, 2013
From: Charles Kuss <chaskuss(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: SLICK / LASAR manuals
Ralph, =C2-I really have to wonder about you sometimes.=C2- =C2-=C2- Why w ould I only need to "loan" an electronic document???=C2- I do not have th e F-1100 manual. However, I DO have the L-1503 rev A Overhaul and Maintenan ce Manual, circa 2000. Chapter 4 outlines what needs to be done for the 500 hour service. Dis-assembly, inspection and reassembly are Chapters 7 thru 9. Chapter 11 has a parts break down. Will this work for you?? Charlie Kuss --- On Sat, 1/5/13, Ralph E. Capen wrote: From: Ralph E. Capen <recapen(at)earthlink.net> Subject: RV-List: SLICK / LASAR manuals Date: Saturday, January 5, 2013, 8:15 AM Does anyone have an electronic copy of the F-1100 Slick Master Service Manu al (not just the index) and the L-1500 LASAR Ignition System Master Service Manual? =C2-Would like to borrow and figure out the 500 hour rebuild req =======0A=0A ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 05, 2013
From: Charles Kuss <chaskuss(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: LASAR 500 Hour inspection Requirement
Ralph, =C2-I like Labatts or Ice House. No need for an entire case, as I only se nt you half of what you are looking for. If we ever meet, you can buy me a single beer. Do you ever get to Sun N' Fun? I ask, because I volunteer at t he SHEET METAL WORKSHOP there. Charlie Kuss PS Please forward a copy of the F-1100 manual to me, if you find it. --- On Sat, 1/5/13, Ralph E. Capen wrote: From: Ralph E. Capen <recapen(at)earthlink.net> Subject: RE: RV-List: Re: LASAR 500 Hour inspection Requirement Date: Saturday, January 5, 2013, 8:11 AM Wow you are correct =93 gotta find someone that has a set and borrow them for a case of beer.. =C2-From: owner-rv-list-server@matroni cs.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV6 Flyer Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 11:44 AM Subject: RE: RV-List: Re: LASAR 500 Hour inspection Requirement =C2-http: //www.championaerospace.com/support/technical-publications/ They are expensive IMHO. Gary A. Sobek "My Sanity" RV-6 N157GS O-320 Hartzell, 2,672+ Flying Hours So. CA, USA > Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 10:43:53 -0500 > From: recapen(at)earthlink.net > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: Re: LASAR 500 Hour inspection Requirement > > > > So, I'm a few hundred flight hours behind you..... > > -----Original Message----- > >From: Edwardoc <Rv8tor(at)mac.com> > >Sent: Jan 4, 2013 10:20 AM > >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > >Subject: RV-List: Re: LASAR 500 Hour inspection Requirement > > > > > >I do not have those manuals. All I have is the install manual which has an inspection/overhaul requirement at 500 hour intervals. I am hoping there is someone who had the inspection done out there who can shed some informa tion on it. > > > > > > > > > >Read this topic online here: > > > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=391605#391605 =C2- =C2 -http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-Listhttp://forums.matronics.comhtt ======0A=0A ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 05, 2013
Subject: AOA units
From: Vince Frazier <vincefrazier(at)gmail.com>
Charlie, I have the http://www.liftreserve.com/ gauge in my plane and am quite pleased with it. It requires no power to operate so in my opinion it makes a great backup to our electric panels... or any other panel. Not affiliated with LRI, just a happy customer. Thanks, Vince Frazier Flyboy Accessories 3963 Caborn Road North Mount Vernon, IN 47620 812-464-1839 1-888-8FLYBOY 1-888-835-9269 www.flyboyaccessories.com On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 2:02 AM, RV-List Digest Server wrote: > From: "charlie" <cheathco(at)cox.net> > Subject: RV-List: AOA units > > I was reading about an AOA that seems easier to install and not terribly > expensive. I would like to hear from those of you (if any) who have an > AOA in your plane. How useful? Any Caveats? Thanks, Charlie > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: SLICK / LASAR manuals
Date: Jan 05, 2013
And yes these would probably help. Thanks! From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Charles Kuss Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2013 2:11 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: SLICK / LASAR manuals Ralph, I really have to wonder about you sometimes. <http://mail.yimg.com/nq/mc/1_0_0/mesg/tsmileys2/11.gif> Why would I only need to "loan" an electronic document??? I do not have the F-1100 manual. However, I DO have the L-1503 rev A Overhaul and Maintenance Manual, circa 2000. Chapter 4 outlines what needs to be done for the 500 hour service. Dis-assembly, inspection and reassembly are Chapters 7 thru 9. Chapter 11 has a parts break down. Will this work for you?? Charlie Kuss --- On Sat, 1/5/13, Ralph E. Capen wrote: From: Ralph E. Capen <recapen(at)earthlink.net> Subject: RV-List: SLICK / LASAR manuals Date: Saturday, January 5, 2013, 8:15 AM Does anyone have an electronic copy of the F-1100 Slick Master Service Manual (not just the index) and the L-1500 LASAR Ignition System Master Service Manual? Would like to borrow and figure out the 500 hour rebuild requirement. Ralph Capen "http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List">http://www.matronics.com/Nav ig_blank" href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Valovich, Paul" <pvalovich(at)dcscorp.com>
Subject: Re: AOA unitsAOA units
Date: Jan 07, 2013
I have an AFS Pro AOA displayed on my 4500 in my -8A - and never use it. Never thought I'd say the above since I'm a former 30 year Navy carrier guy who never used airspeed for landing or maneuvering. I've spent a lot of time exploring the low speed flight envelope and am pre tty comfortable maneuvering the -8A by feel and an occasional glance at the 4500 airspeed readout and separate g meter. For me (your site picture / butt feel may vary) it was becoming very famili ar with the nose position required to hold 70 kts in a normal approach - an d being willing to respond to the weird short hair feelings when excessive angle of bank / g's are introduced in the pattern during an abnormal approa ch. And being willing to let go of the stick for instantaneous recovery dur ing acro. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 07, 2013
From: Linn <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: AOA unitsAOA units
I'm always amazed at the question in conversation about my Pitts ...... what airspeed do you flare at? How would I know? I'm far more interested in where I'm crashing than how fast it's happening!!!! :-P When you have a lot of hours in any airplane your senses will come into full play .... your hearing, stick forces, and sight picture will keep you out of trouble. Like me, it may take a few landings that aren't pretty ..... but I look at them as training aids. Having said that, I'm installing AOA in my RV-10 just because it's built into my MGL Odysseys. Never paid any attention to the stall warning horns before so I don't see that changing. Might be fun to play with though!!! Linn On 1/7/2013 10:18 AM, Valovich, Paul wrote: > > I have an AFS Pro AOA displayed on my 4500 in my -8A -- and never use it. > > Never thought I'd say the above since I'm a former 30 year Navy > carrier guy who never used airspeed for landing or maneuvering. > > I've spent a lot of time exploring the low speed flight envelope and > am pretty comfortable maneuvering the -8A by feel and an occasional > glance at the 4500 airspeed readout and separate g meter. > > For me (your site picture / butt feel may vary) it was becoming very > familiar with the nose position required to hold 70 kts in a normal > approach -- and being willing to respond to the weird short hair > feelings when excessive angle of bank / g's are introduced in the > pattern during an abnormal approach. And being willing to let go of > the stick for instantaneous recovery during acro. > > * > > > * > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John J" <n212pj(at)gmail.com>
Subject: AOA unitsAOA units
Date: Jan 15, 2013
AOA = cheap insurance for when your butt and brain are tired John From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Linn Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 8:21 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: AOA unitsAOA units I'm always amazed at the question in conversation about my Pitts ...... what airspeed do you flare at? How would I know? I'm far more interested in where I'm crashing than how fast it's happening!!!! :-P When you have a lot of hours in any airplane your senses will come into full play .... your hearing, stick forces, and sight picture will keep you out of trouble. Like me, it may take a few landings that aren't pretty ..... but I look at them as training aids. Having said that, I'm installing AOA in my RV-10 just because it's built into my MGL Odysseys. Never paid any attention to the stall warning horns before so I don't see that changing. Might be fun to play with though!!! Linn On 1/7/2013 10:18 AM, Valovich, Paul wrote: I have an AFS Pro AOA displayed on my 4500 in my -8A - and never use it. Never thought I'd say the above since I'm a former 30 year Navy carrier guy who never used airspeed for landing or maneuvering. I've spent a lot of time exploring the low speed flight envelope and am pretty comfortable maneuvering the -8A by feel and an occasional glance at the 4500 airspeed readout and separate g meter. For me (your site picture / butt feel may vary) it was becoming very familiar with the nose position required to hold 70 kts in a normal approach - and being willing to respond to the weird short hair feelings when excessive angle of bank / g's are introduced in the pattern during an abnormal approach. And being willing to let go of the stick for instantaneous recovery during acro. No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 01/07/13 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "charlie" <cheathco(at)cox.net>
Subject: Ground adjustable composit prop for RV's
Date: Feb 01, 2013
Sensenich will begin deliveries next month. Wondering if anyone with o-320 (which is what they are made for) is, or would consider installing one? Charlie H ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 01, 2013
From: TERRY MORTIMORE <terry.mortimore(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: Ground adjustable composit prop for RV's
Hi Charlie, I'm leaning that way. I've been admiring them for a few years now. I'm reluctant to be the first to adopt them, but I will not need it until the fall so I'm hoping there will be a few in service by then. Terry. ----- Original Message ----- From: charlie <cheathco(at)cox.net> Subject: RV-List: Ground adjustable composit prop for RV's Sensenich will begin deliveries next month. Wondering if anyone with o-320 (which is what they are made for) is, or would consider installing one? Charlie H ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 03, 2013
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: External Flight Plans - Dynon Skyview/Garmin 696
Dear Listers, Below is a dialog that I'm currently having with Dynon technical support regarding the support for External Flight Plans on the Dynon Skyview. I have a Garmin 696 connected serially to the Dynon and use it for primary GPS positional data. I would like to also have it transfer the current flight plan data as its a LOT easier to look up remote airports, etc. on the Garmin696. But, for some reason, the flight plan data doesn't seem to propagate to the Skyview; I can only assume because the Dynon is ignoring the GPRMB NMEA0182 data fields. In contrast, I have a King Skymap IIIc connected to the GRT HXs in the RV-8 (for testing) and I am able to easily get external flight plan data from the Skymap to the GRT HX over the serial line (see screen shots) Finally, with the new ADSB receiver on the Skyview, I'm no longer getting Traffic data on the Garmin 696. With just the Mode S transponder, I get traffic targets when I'm in traffic areas so the TIS data link (Skyvew->Garmin696) seems to be working. But as soon as I enable the ADSB receiver, I no longer get the traffic on the Garmin 696 even though the ADSB traffic is showing up on the Skyview Map and PDF displays. Below are some composite screen shots I made for Dynon with embedded comments and documentation to describe what I'm seeing. I thought I'd share with the rest of the group in case someone maybe had some feedback or thoughts. - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 120+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode At 10:36 AM 2/1/2013 Friday, you wrote: >Matt, > >Please do send some screen shots. We will fly a flight plan from the Garmin. Do you see the CDI on the HSI? > >I can make sense out of this with a picture. > >Mike H > >Dynon Avionics Technical Support >support(at)dynonavionics.com >Phone: 425-402-0433 - 07:00-17:00 Pacific weekdays >--- > >-----Original Message----- >From: "Matt Dralle" <dralle(at)matronics.com> >Reply-To: "Matt Dralle" >Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 10:01:39 -0800 >To: "Dynon Technical Support" >Cc: "dralle(at)matronics.com" , "michael Woolson" >Subject: Re: (Case 117228) Garmin GPS696 Input to Skyview > >>Hi Mike, >> >>That's not what I'm talking about. What I mean is when I go into the Garmin and enter in a flight plan. For example, KLVK to KEDU to KMRY. These destinations are being transmitted by the Garmin over the NMEA 0183 serial output but the Skyview isn't using them. I have to go into the Skyview and reenter the destinations. >> >>In contrast, on my Garmin to GRT HX installation, if I have a flight plan entered into the Garmin, that information is picked up and used by the GRT HX. If I don't have a flight plan on the Garmin, then the GRT HX uses whatever I enter in on the GRT HX. I can sent you some screen shots if you want. >> >>Matt >> >>At 09:26 AM 2/1/2013 Friday, you wrote: >> Hi Mike, Please see that attached two images. The first describes what I'm seeing on the Dynon/Garmin696 and the second shows what I'm getting on the GRT HX/SkymapIIIc. The third shot is of my Dynon and Garmin 696 configuration. Note that with the Dynon, there's no external flight plan data utiliation. Note on the GRT, there is full external flight plan data utilization. I've included the NMEA0183 data strings that include the flight plan data. Also note, the lack of ADSB traffic on the Garmin 696 when the ADSB is enabled. With the ADSB DISABLED, the Mode S traffic appears. Emacs! Emacs! Emacs! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 03, 2013
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: External Flight Plans - Dynon Skyview/Garmin 696
Dear Listers, Below is a dialog that I'm currently having with Dynon technical support regarding the support for External Flight Plans on the Dynon Skyview. I have a Garmin 696 connected serially to the Dynon and use it for primary GPS positional data. I would like to also have it transfer the current flight plan data as its a LOT easier to look up remote airports, etc. on the Garmin696. But, for some reason, the flight plan data doesn't seem to propagate to the Skyview; I can only assume because the Dynon is ignoring the GPRMB NMEA0182 data fields. In contrast, I have a King Skymap IIIc connected to the GRT HXs in the RV-8 (for testing) and I am able to easily get external flight plan data from the Skymap to the GRT HX over the serial line (see screen shots) Finally, with the new ADSB receiver on the Skyview, I'm no longer getting Traffic data on the Garmin 696. With just the Mode S transponder, I get traffic targets when I'm in traffic areas so the TIS data link (Skyvew->Garmin696) seems to be working. But as soon as I enable the ADSB receiver, I no longer get the traffic on the Garmin 696 even though the ADSB traffic is showing up on the Skyview Map and PDF displays. Below are some composite screen shots I made for Dynon with embedded comments and documentation to describe what I'm seeing. I thought I'd share with the rest of the group in case someone maybe had some feedback or thoughts. - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 120+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode At 10:36 AM 2/1/2013 Friday, you wrote: >Matt, > >Please do send some screen shots. We will fly a flight plan from the Garmin. Do you see the CDI on the HSI? > >I can make sense out of this with a picture. > >Mike H > >Dynon Avionics Technical Support >support(at)dynonavionics.com >Phone: 425-402-0433 - 07:00-17:00 Pacific weekdays >--- > >-----Original Message----- >From: "Matt Dralle" <dralle(at)matronics.com> >Reply-To: "Matt Dralle" >Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 10:01:39 -0800 >To: "Dynon Technical Support" >Cc: "dralle(at)matronics.com" , "michael Woolson" >Subject: Re: (Case 117228) Garmin GPS696 Input to Skyview > >>Hi Mike, >> >>That's not what I'm talking about. What I mean is when I go into the Garmin and enter in a flight plan. For example, KLVK to KEDU to KMRY. These destinations are being transmitted by the Garmin over the NMEA 0183 serial output but the Skyview isn't using them. I have to go into the Skyview and reenter the destinations. >> >>In contrast, on my Garmin to GRT HX installation, if I have a flight plan entered into the Garmin, that information is picked up and used by the GRT HX. If I don't have a flight plan on the Garmin, then the GRT HX uses whatever I enter in on the GRT HX. I can sent you some screen shots if you want. >> >>Matt >> >>At 09:26 AM 2/1/2013 Friday, you wrote: >> Hi Mike, Please see that attached two images. The first describes what I'm seeing on the Dynon/Garmin696 and the second shows what I'm getting on the GRT HX/SkymapIIIc. The third shot is of my Dynon and Garmin 696 configuration. Note that with the Dynon, there's no external flight plan data utiliation. Note on the GRT, there is full external flight plan data utilization. I've included the NMEA0183 data strings that include the flight plan data. Also note, the lack of ADSB traffic on the Garmin 696 when the ADSB is enabled. With the ADSB DISABLED, the Mode S traffic appears. Emacs! Emacs! Emacs! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 03, 2013
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Re: (Case 117320) VP-200 Compatibility with Dynon Skyview 5.1
EMS Data (I sent the message below to Dynon this afternoon. FYI -Matt) Dear Dynon Support, I was forwarded the text immediately below regarding the new Skyview Version 5.1 issue and EMS data stream compatibility with Vertical Power VP-200 I think that Dynon is kind of missing the point here. Dynon has, for all intents and purposes, developed a "standard" for this EMS data format. Whether arbitrary 3rd parties use it and/or communicate that use to Dynon is also beside the point. Dynon has committed to a certain format and as such cannot change it without incurring some serious, potentially negative and/or life threatening ramifications in the field. The designers of TCP/IP didn't just randomly decide to change the order and meaning byte values in the standard. A standard is a standard. When its done and released, *its done*. Version 1.0 cannot be updated. Adding a "version string" to the data stream doesn't work either as the devices listening to version 1.0 don't know the version string is there and are equally as broken. The only option is to version each new format and allow the user to select between the various version. Or, depending on the flexibility of the protocol, ADD new data strings to the format. But the original data strings *cannot* be changed. For example, in NMEA0183, $GPGGAxxx, $GPRMCxxx etc. allow for a progression of new formats to be added. But the format of $GPGGAxxx always has to remain the same. I work at a Government research laboratory in Livermore where I engineer and write embedded firmware for remote security terminals that are used throughout the Department of Energy sites. Part of that responsibility is to design, implement, and utilize serial protocols for communicating between various devices over both RS485 and Ethernet. If I were to make a change to our protocol like Dynon has done in the upgrade between 5.0 and 5.1, I would be fired. Plain and simple. Even IF everyone that is using the protocol happens to be notified of the change, there is still the issue of incrementally upgrading all of the end devices. I guess my point here is that Dynon needs to take their various "proprietary" serial protocols a whole lot more seriously. I believe this is now at least the *third* time that a protocol change has adversely impacted the user community. That is *not* acceptable. I would have probably been fired after the first indiscretion, if not strongly reprimanded. The second and third times would just not have happened. For protocol versioning control, Dynon needs to either add additional named strings to their protocol or they need to simply start versioning each change AND including support for all versions in their products. For example, the user should be able to select between EMS Version 1 or EMS Version 2 or EMS Version 3 from the configuration menu. The format of EMS Version 1 or any previous versions can never change; period. And finally, given Dynon's lackadaisical attitude toward their protocol specifications, I find it almost impossible to believe that a simple downgrade from Version 5.1 to 5.0 is, by default, disallowed? Why aren't the same Draconian version control practices imposed on the customers, applied to their software developers as well? Matt Dralle RV-8/RV-6/RV-4 >Forwarded Email (Originally from Dynon Support) > > We updated the serial stream because we had some important customers that asked for specific elements to be added to the stream. We knew this was a possibility since day one, and even put a version number in the serial stream so an application can tell that the stream has been changed. We would always prefer to not change the format, but at some point you need to balance the needs of a variety of customers, and we had a clear business case to support customers asking for new features in the serial stream. > >One of the issues here is that the VP-200 is not a product we "support." While we have official support for the VP-X, >Vertical Power used our serial stream for the VP-200 on their own accord without any input from us. This is fine and in fact the whole reason that we created a documented serial stream, but this means we didn't even really know they were using it so it's hard for us to realize that we were going to break anything. Compatibility is something that we test every release for products we support, but isn't something that we can promise for arbitrary 3rd party devices that few of our customers use. > >We only moved a few parameters around in the new serial stream, so it's unfortunate that it will take them months to fix this as it's likely just a few constants in their code to make it work again. > >It is possible to revert to 5.0 without much hassle. Contact support via email or phone and we can send you instructions. At 03:48 PM 2/1/2013 Friday, Dynon Technical Support wrote: >Matt: > >Another customer told us today that Vertical Power recommended not updating to v5.1 because of changes Dynon made to the streaming data format. > >We advise talking to Vertical Power first. > >Thanks, > >Steve > >Dynon Avionics Technical Support >support(at)dynonavionics.com >Phone: 425-402-0433 - 07:00-17:00 Pacific weekdays > >-----Original Message----- >From: "Matt Dralle" <dralle(at)matronics.com> >Reply-To: "Matt Dralle" >Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 15:26:51 -0800 >To: "support(at)dynonavionics.com" >Cc: "support(at)verticalpower.com" >Subject: VP-200 Compatibility with Dynon Skyview 5.1 EMS Data > >>With the release of Skyview 5.1, it seems there might be an issue with the new EMS data format from the Skyview and compatibility with the Vertical Power VP-200 EMS input. >> >>I haven't upgraded my Skyview from 5.0 to 5.1 but I was planning to on Saturday. Any thoughts? >> >>Here's the thread from the RV10-List Forum (towards the bottom): >> >>http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=393418#393418 >> >>Thanks for your help, >> >>Matt Dralle >> Matt G Dralle | Matronics | 581 Jeannie Way | Livermore | CA | 94550 925-606-1001 V | 925-606-6281 F | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ WWW | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DEAN PSIROPOULOS" <dean.psiropoulos(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Sensenich Composite Prop
Date: Feb 04, 2013
A friend who is a corporate pilot and uses his RV-6A to commute to work was the fortunate person who got to do the testing of this new prop (on his 160 Lycoming). Early on there were some serious issues that it looks like Sensenich has (mostly) solved. One of those issues was that the leading edge had a tendency to erode in rain and that was supposed to be fixed by installing a metal overlay that covers the material around and about a quarter inch back from leading edge. When I stopped to visit Ed last Saturday, I was looking at the prop and noticed that some of the surface of what looks like a resin top coat (that extends just slightly above the surface of the leading edge metal overlay about 1/16th inch) had chipped off behind the metal overlay in a few places. I didn't get a chance to ask Ed what had caused that so I don't know what his thoughts are on it. Ed does fly the RV-6A day/night in all kinds of weather and through the heavy afternoon Florida summer downpours and, he was getting tired of worrying about the leading edges of the wood prop he was using (didn't want to have to detour around heavy weather when he had to be at work ASAP). The prop was still on the airplane and he was obviously still flying it that way so it's not a structural issue (the only way I can think to describe it is if there had been a buildup of "bondo" behind the leading edge metal overlay and rain or some other substance had struck the edge of the "bondo" (that stuck up just behind the metal overlay) and just chipped the "bondo" away from the surface of the blade about 1/4 in back from the metal overlay and about 1/4 inch wide in a few places). The blade structure did not look compromised to me but, had I spent $3500.00 on that prop (and it's asthetically a beautiful looking prop) only to have some of the blade surface resin chip away, I would not be too happy about it. This resin to which I'm referring to may just be a very thick coat of epoxy paint but the chipping still ruins the asthetics of the prop when you look at it up close, something I'm sure their customers would not be happy about in any case. Sensenich also makes a smaller version of this prop that is used on the Rotax 912 (100HP) engines. Tampa Bay Aerosports installs this prop on their Revo weight shift trikes that they sell and I know some folks that own these trikes. They had returned one the blades to Sensenich for some work due to some of the resin chipping off similar to what I described above. Last I talked to them they had flown with the repaired blade for several hours only to have the problem recur (I inspected that blade and it looked a bit more serious like maybe a rock had struck the blade the second time so it may not have been a faulty repair, I won't know until I talk to them again). Obviously an issue like this resin chipping is not something one would want to have occur very often. The good part is that, IT IS Sensenich and they make these in Plant City Florida so if you live in the USA it will be a lot less inconvenient than sending an MT prop back to Germany. But, it would mean having the airplane not flyable for a few weeks while the prop is repaired and that's not something we all want to happen often. As far as the performance of the prop, Ed has great things to say about that, he loves it. Smooth, light and easy to adjust for the performance you want and he says it performs a lot like a CS prop without all the weight and complexity. So if they get this chipping resin problem solved I may have to consider one myself. Before I get the Plant City folks too ticked off at me though, let me recommend their metal RV props. I've been using their FP metal prop on a 180 HP RV-6A for several years and I love it. Yes it's a little heavier than wood or composite (40Lbs vs about 15 for wood and its mounting hardware) but it is very robust and even though it's a cruise prop that doesn't give me full RPM for takeoff, that's not an issue with extra power the RV has. Also, if you are going to fly with two people and baggage for long trips, you might need that extra weight up front to avoid weight and balance issues. I had considered composite and Hartzell CS props while building the RV and just couldn't justify spending the money when FP RVs have more than adequate power available for takeoff. Sure if you are flying out of a high altitude short strip, you might need every ounce of power you'd get from a CS installation but, very rarely and, I'd rather put the $3-5 thousand extra dollars in the gas tank and have that much more flying time. The MT props are beautiful smooth and light but, aside from the cost to purchase, having to remove them for maintenance and send them to Germany at great expense at fairly regular intervals makes even less sense than buying a Hartzell CS. Just one RV guy's opinion, consider what you paid for it. Dean Psiropoulos RV-6A 197DM 3+ years of flying fun ________________________________ Original Message _____________________________________ From: "charlie" <cheathco(at)cox.net> Subject: RV-List: Ground adjustable composit prop for RV's Sensenich will begin deliveries next month. Wondering if anyone with o-320 (which is what they are made for) is, or would consider installing one? Charlie H ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 04, 2013
From: Linn <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Sensenich Composite Prop
FYI .... MT is located on Deland FL airport .... next to the Gin Mill restaurant. Linn On 2/4/2013 2:12 AM, DEAN PSIROPOULOS wrote: > > A friend who is a corporate pilot and uses his RV-6A to commute to work was > the fortunate person who got to do the testing of this new prop (on his 160 > Lycoming). Early on there were some serious issues that it looks like > Sensenich has (mostly) solved. One of those issues was that the leading > edge had a tendency to erode in rain and that was supposed to be fixed by > installing a metal overlay that covers the material around and about a > quarter inch back from leading edge. When I stopped to visit Ed last > Saturday, I was looking at the prop and noticed that some of the surface of > what looks like a resin top coat (that extends just slightly above the > surface of the leading edge metal overlay about 1/16th inch) had chipped off > behind the metal overlay in a few places. > > I didn't get a chance to ask Ed what had caused that so I don't know what > his thoughts are on it. Ed does fly the RV-6A day/night in all kinds of > weather and through the heavy afternoon Florida summer downpours and, he was > getting tired of worrying about the leading edges of the wood prop he was > using (didn't want to have to detour around heavy weather when he had to be > at work ASAP). The prop was still on the airplane and he was obviously still > flying it that way so it's not a structural issue (the only way I can think > to describe it is if there had been a buildup of "bondo" behind the leading > edge metal overlay and rain or some other substance had struck the edge of > the "bondo" (that stuck up just behind the metal overlay) and just chipped > the "bondo" away from the surface of the blade about 1/4 in back from the > metal overlay and about 1/4 inch wide in a few places). The blade structure > did not look compromised to me but, had I spent $3500.00 on that prop (and > it's asthetically a beautiful looking prop) only to have some of the blade > surface resin chip away, I would not be too happy about it. This resin to > which I'm referring to may just be a very thick coat of epoxy paint but the > chipping still ruins the asthetics of the prop when you look at it up close, > something I'm sure their customers would not be happy about in any case. > > Sensenich also makes a smaller version of this prop that is used on the > Rotax 912 (100HP) engines. Tampa Bay Aerosports installs this prop on their > Revo weight shift trikes that they sell and I know some folks that own these > trikes. They had returned one the blades to Sensenich for some work due to > some of the resin chipping off similar to what I described above. Last I > talked to them they had flown with the repaired blade for several hours only > to have the problem recur (I inspected that blade and it looked a bit more > serious like maybe a rock had struck the blade the second time so it may not > have been a faulty repair, I won't know until I talk to them again). > Obviously an issue like this resin chipping is not something one would want > to have occur very often. The good part is that, IT IS Sensenich and they > make these in Plant City Florida so if you live in the USA it will be a lot > less inconvenient than sending an MT prop back to Germany. But, it would > mean having the airplane not flyable for a few weeks while the prop is > repaired and that's not something we all want to happen often. > > As far as the performance of the prop, Ed has great things to say about > that, he loves it. Smooth, light and easy to adjust for the performance > you want and he says it performs a lot like a CS prop without all the weight > and complexity. So if they get this chipping resin problem solved I may > have to consider one myself. > > Before I get the Plant City folks too ticked off at me though, let me > recommend their metal RV props. I've been using their FP metal prop on a 180 > HP RV-6A for several years and I love it. Yes it's a little heavier than > wood or composite (40Lbs vs about 15 for wood and its mounting hardware) but > it is very robust and even though it's a cruise prop that doesn't give me > full RPM for takeoff, that's not an issue with extra power the RV has. Also, > if you are going to fly with two people and baggage for long trips, you > might need that extra weight up front to avoid weight and balance issues. I > had considered composite and Hartzell CS props while building the RV and > just couldn't justify spending the money when FP RVs have more than adequate > power available for takeoff. Sure if you are flying out of a high altitude > short strip, you might need every ounce of power you'd get from a CS > installation but, very rarely and, I'd rather put the $3-5 thousand extra > dollars in the gas tank and have that much more flying time. The MT props > are beautiful smooth and light but, aside from the cost to purchase, having > to remove them for maintenance and send them to Germany at great expense at > fairly regular intervals makes even less sense than buying a Hartzell CS. > Just one RV guy's opinion, consider what you paid for it. > > Dean Psiropoulos > RV-6A 197DM > 3+ years of flying fun > ________________________________ Original Message > _____________________________________ > > > From: "charlie" <cheathco(at)cox.net> > Subject: RV-List: Ground adjustable composit prop for RV's > > Sensenich will begin deliveries next month. Wondering if anyone with > o-320 (which is what they are made for) is, or would consider installing > one? Charlie H > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 04, 2013
From: HCRV6(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: (Case 117320) VP-200 Compatibility with Dynon Skyview
5.1 EMS Data Matt, Please keep us in the loop when (IF?) Dynon reply's. Harry ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Dralle" <dralle(at)matronics.com> Sent: Sunday, February 3, 2013 4:17:59 PM Subject: RV-List: Re: (Case 117320) VP-200 Compatibility with Dynon Skyview 5.1 EMS Data (I sent the message below to Dynon this afternoon. FYI -Matt) Dear Dynon Support, I was forwarded the text immediately below regarding the new Skyview Version 5.1 issue and EMS data stream compatibility with Vertical Power VP-200 I think that Dynon is kind of missing the point here. Dynon has, for all intents and purposes, developed a "standard" for this EMS data format. Whether arbitrary 3rd parties use it and/or communicate that use to Dynon is also beside the point. Dynon has committed to a certain format and as such cannot change it without incurring some serious, potentially negative and/or life threatening ramifications in the field. The designers of TCP/IP didn't just randomly decide to change the order and meaning byte values in the standard. A standard is a standard. When its done and released, *its done*. Version 1.0 cannot be updated. Adding a "version string" to the data stream doesn't work either as the devices listening to version 1.0 don't know the version string is there and are equally as broken. The only option is to version each new format and allow the user to select between the various version. Or, depending on the flexibility of the protocol, ADD new data strings to the format. But the original data strings *cannot* be changed. For example, in NMEA0183, $GPGGAxxx, $GPRMCxxx etc. allow for a progression of new formats to be added. But the format of $GPGGAxxx always has to remain the same. I work at a Government research laboratory in Livermore where I engineer and write embedded firmware for remote security terminals that are used throughout the Department of Energy sites. Part of that responsibility is to design, implement, and utilize serial protocols for communicating between various devices over both RS485 and Ethernet. If I were to make a change to our protocol like Dynon has done in the upgrade between 5.0 and 5.1, I would be fired. Plain and simple. Even IF everyone that is using the protocol happens to be notified of the change, there is still the issue of incrementally upgrading all of the end devices. I guess my point here is that Dynon needs to take their various "proprietary" serial protocols a whole lot more seriously. I believe this is now at least the *third* time that a protocol change has adversely impacted the user community. That is *not* acceptable. I would have probably been fired after the first indiscretion, if not strongly reprimanded. The second and third times would just not have happened. For protocol versioning control, Dynon needs to either add additional named strings to their protocol or they need to simply start versioning each change AND including support for all versions in their products. For example, the user should be able to select between EMS Version 1 or EMS Version 2 or EMS Version 3 from the configuration menu. The format of EMS Version 1 or any previous versions can never change; period. And finally, given Dynon's lackadaisical attitude toward their protocol specifications, I find it almost impossible to believe that a simple downgrade from Version 5.1 to 5.0 is, by default, disallowed? Why aren't the same Draconian version control practices imposed on the customers, applied to their software developers as well? Matt Dralle RV-8/RV-6/RV-4 >Forwarded Email (Originally from Dynon Support) > > We updated the serial stream because we had some important customers that asked for specific elements to be added to the stream. We knew this was a possibility since day one, and even put a version number in the serial stream so an application can tell that the stream has been changed. We would always prefer to not change the format, but at some point you need to balance the needs of a variety of customers, and we had a clear business case to support customers asking for new features in the serial stream. > >One of the issues here is that the VP-200 is not a product we "support." While we have official support for the VP-X, >Vertical Power used our serial stream for the VP-200 on their own accord without any input from us. This is fine and in fact the whole reason that we created a documented serial stream, but this means we didn't even really know they were using it so it's hard for us to realize that we were going to break anything. Compatibility is something that we test every release for products we support, but isn't something that we can promise for arbitrary 3rd party devices that few of our customers use. > >We only moved a few parameters around in the new serial stream, so it's unfortunate that it will take them months to fix this as it's likely just a few constants in their code to make it work again. > >It is possible to revert to 5.0 without much hassle. Contact support via email or phone and we can send you instructions. At 03:48 PM 2/1/2013 Friday, Dynon Technical Support wrote: >Matt: > >Another customer told us today that Vertical Power recommended not updating to v5.1 because of changes Dynon made to the streaming data format. > >We advise talking to Vertical Power first. > >Thanks, > >Steve > >Dynon Avionics Technical Support >support(at)dynonavionics.com >Phone: 425-402-0433 - 07:00-17:00 Pacific weekdays > >-----Original Message----- >From: "Matt Dralle" <dralle(at)matronics.com> >Reply-To: "Matt Dralle" >Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 15:26:51 -0800 >To: "support(at)dynonavionics.com" >Cc: "support(at)verticalpower.com" >Subject: VP-200 Compatibility with Dynon Skyview 5.1 EMS Data > >>With the release of Skyview 5.1, it seems there might be an issue with the new EMS data format from the Skyview and compatibility with the Vertical Power VP-200 EMS input. >> >>I haven't upgraded my Skyview from 5.0 to 5.1 but I was planning to on Saturday. Any thoughts? >> >>Here's the thread from the RV10-List Forum (towards the bottom): >> >>http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=393418#393418 >> >>Thanks for your help, >> >>Matt Dralle >> Matt G Dralle | Matronics | 581 Jeannie Way | Livermore | CA | 94550 925-606-1001 V | 925-606-6281 F | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ WWW | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ralph Finch <ralphmariafinch(at)gmail.com>
Date: Feb 04, 2013
Subject: Re: (Case 117320) VP-200 Compatibility with Dynon Skyview
5.1 EMS Data The good news is that Vertical Power is working on a fix for this. My impression is that it won't take ages to deliver a firmware update for the VP-200. While Dynon's software release practices are poor, the burden is on VP and other users of Dynon's protocols to update their products, rather than Dynon take the lead. RF On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:34 PM, wrote: > Matt, Please keep us in the loop when (IF?) Dynon reply's. > > Harry > > ________________________________ > From: "Matt Dralle" <dralle(at)matronics.com> > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com, rv-list(at)matronics.com, rv8-list(at)matronics.com > Sent: Sunday, February 3, 2013 4:17:59 PM > Subject: RV-List: Re: (Case 117320) VP-200 Compatibility with Dynon Skyview > 5.1 EMS Data > > > (I sent the message below to Dynon this afternoon. FYI -Matt) > > > Dear Dynon Support, > > I was forwarded the text immediately below regarding the new Skyview Version > 5.1 issue and EMS data stream compatibility with Vertical Power VP-200 > > I think that Dynon is kind of missing the point here. Dynon has, for all > intents and purposes, developed a "standard" for this EMS data format. > Whether arbitrary 3rd parties use it and/or communicate that use to Dynon is > also beside the point. Dynon has committed to a certain format and as such > cannot change it without incurring some serious, potentially negative and/or > life threatening ramifications in the field. The designers of TCP/IP didn't > just randomly decide to change the order and meaning byte values in the > standard. A standard is a standard. When its done and released, *its > done*. Version 1.0 cannot be updated. > > Adding a "version string" to the data stream doesn't work either as the > devices listening to version 1.0 don't know the version string is there and > are equally as broken. > > The only option is to version each new format and allow the user to select > between the various version. Or, depending on the flexibility of the > protocol, ADD new data strings to the format. But the original data strings > *cannot* be changed. For example, in NMEA0183, $GPGGAxxx, $GPRMCxxx etc. > allow for a progression of new formats to be added. But the format of > $GPGGAxxx always has to remain the same. > > I work at a Government research laboratory in Livermore where I engineer and > write embedded firmware for remote security terminals that are used > throughout the Department of Energy sites. Part of that responsibility is > to design, implement, and utilize serial protocols for communicating between > various devices over both RS485 and Ethernet. If I were to make a change to > our protocol like Dynon has done in the upgrade between 5.0 and 5.1, I would > be fired. Plain and simple. Even IF everyone that is using the protocol > happens to be notified of the change, there is still the issue of > incrementally upgrading all of the end devices. > > I guess my point here is that Dynon needs to take their various > "proprietary" serial protocols a whole lot more seriously. I believe this > is now at least the *third* time that a protocol change has adversely > impacted the user community. That is *not* acceptable. I would have > probably been fired after the first indiscretion, if not strongly > reprimanded. The second and third times would just not have happened. > > For protocol versioning control, Dynon needs to either add additional named > strings to their protocol or they need to simply start versioning each > change AND including support for all versions in their products. For > example, the user should be able to select between EMS Version 1 or EMS > Version 2 or EMS Version 3 from the configuration menu. The format of EMS > Version 1 or any previous versions can never change; period. > > And finally, given Dynon's lackadaisical attitude toward their protocol > specifications, I find it almost impossible to believe that a simple > downgrade from Version 5.1 to 5.0 is, by default, disallowed? Why aren't > the same Draconian version control practices imposed on the customers, > applied to their software developers as well? > > Matt Dralle > RV-8/RV-6/RV-4 > > >>Forwarded Email (Originally from Dynon Support) >> >> We updated the serial stream because we had some important customers that >> asked for specific elements to be added to the stream. We knew this was a >> possibility since day one, and even put a version number in the serial >> stream so an application can tell that the stream has been changed. We would >> always prefer to not change the format, but at some point you need to >> balance the needs of a variety of customers, and we had a clear business >> case to support customers asking for new features in the serial stream. >> >>One of the issues here is that the VP-200 is not a product we "support." >> While we have official support for the VP-X, >>Vertical Power used our serial stream for the VP-200 on their own accord >> without any input from us. This is fine and in fact the whole reason that we >> created a documented serial stream, but this means we didn't even really >> know they were using it so it's hard for us to realize that we were going to >> break anything. Compatibility is something that we test every release for >> products we support, but isn't something that we can promise for arbitrary >> 3rd party devices that few of our customers use. >> >>We only moved a few parameters around in the new serial stream, so it's >> unfortunate that it will take them months to fix this as it's likely just a >> few constants in their code to make it work again. >> >>It is possible to revert to 5.0 without much hassle. Contact support via >> email or phone and we can send you instructions. > > > At 03:48 PM 2/1/2013 Friday, Dynon Technical Support wrote: >>Matt: >> >>Another customer told us today that Vertical Power recommended not updating >> to v5.1 because of changes Dynon made to the streaming data format. >> >>We advise talking to Vertical Power first. >> >>Thanks, >> >>Steve >> >>Dynon Avionics Technical Support >>support(at)dynonavionics.com >>Phone: 425-402-0433 - 07:00-17:00 Pacific weekdays >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: "Matt Dralle" <dralle(at)matronics.com> >>Reply-To: "Matt Dralle" >>Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 15:26:51 -0800 >>To: "support(at)dynonavionics.com" >>Cc: "support(at)verticalpower.com" >>Subject: VP-200 Compatibility with Dynon Skyview 5.1 EMS Data >> >>>With the release of Skyview 5.1, it seems there might be an issue with the >>> new EMS data format from the Skyview and compatibility with the Vertical >>> Power VP-200 EMS input. >>> >>>I haven't upgraded my Skyview from 5.0 to 5.1 but I was planning to on >>> Saturday. Any thoughts? >>> >>>Here's the thread from the RV10-List Forum (towards the bottom): >>> >>>http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=393418#393418 >>> >>>Thanks for your help, >>> >>>Matt Dralle >>> > > > Matt G Dralle | Matronics | 581 Jeannie Way | Livermore | CA | 94550 > 925-606-1001 V | 925-606-6281 F | dralle(at)matronics.com Email > http://www.matronics.com/ WWW | Featuring Products For Aircraft > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 04, 2013
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Fwd: [MARKETING] VP-200/Dynon SkyView Service Bulletin
Well, at least Vertical Power is listening. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [MARKETING] VP-200/Dynon SkyView Service Bulletin Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:01:09 -0500 (EST) From: Vertical Power Support <support(at)verticalpower.com> Having trouble viewing this email? Click Here <http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?llr=siapq6bab&v=0011-u4wRWTE7QK3xYDFGoAs1z-Oa8lqceMcIv0Z75QWQKlyzfoXLB3VtsIDYjde6TCk8cOWjxoRcaiKI8ecjVOvvTX0kYhu_2KRjq8l6cqPas%3D> *Vertical Power* Service Bulletin - February 2013 VP-X <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=00185byfISc7IAb1h4HHtD5wzOniT38PdUPxwMxeCcb9hjfgv3LdUb4D2y5vcnym-8xWHdjt4ubEC51xz-yUh5EmOMTmEpGm80rrpgGRd7DKXwXhVsRHSXmpCKL5vmjzAom> See the VP-X <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=00185byfISc7IDUyUD0HJfTbl8hW5YeOTzIYsSwGfPWpdcZxgMcDt2LfJhK8AvP_954N7V0KqAH3MZNbXa_VDnCMt0aMIn-Je4poDQCDp65i_ebGj6tnX1qeg==> See the VP-400 <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=00185byfISc7ICvq9BKuCqvLhtMfk8okGM0ZXcNnmP1VEu2viMveDTlQupWywYWiKzVzzApQ7Ol9etGNR3hvfTi_-c9XOjH8MfAdYGNQqNuPdrm9NlyTsP37NxEkvYqcDUj> <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=00185byfISc7ICpZ7hvjEOo1IulNzKQQXwO2gGPApJkoJiews3RhrEDQ2UTY4Cq2Hq6Vz60OVj1l215OqAJD1FaJt2byA7lUKL6DoYENiiAKT8yPLTdg7I6m7nHPzNYk0VI> Free! Click Here <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=00185byfISc7IAJsjoIjqd9RO5Wd5U0dxzmkmlFWZub5t2tHgAMJC0rN6MG2MCMZto0yi_4HsefFKsXe4ECNMw9B_fT6a4mRY2XBXCYaXP-i07z1PvzeO1AeqO8ogFsBqhL> <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=00185byfISc7IAqb8rgSijgFgylXcItCBawtFbiVK5fIiHxKyru14rq59vGAUFgsi1aOaw0QybHuEDb1Hg2Li55WsJSj22fiSEsP5K85ZaU1dhA3M57hL_1FpsMWE9pyTINwkTWnURUqFU=> Click to View <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=00185byfISc7IAqb8rgSijgFgylXcItCBawtFbiVK5fIiHxKyru14rq59vGAUFgsi1aOaw0QybHuEDb1Hg2Li55WsJSj22fiSEsP5K85ZaU1dhA3M57hL_1FpsMWE9pyTINwkTWnURUqFU=> On-Line Store <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=00185byfISc7ICkO51T66g8ATry9qbB1q-pzopiNaWOJUkVc_iFGpqrUdLhZzLOa7nEU-yozVpjBNvNdy-N2VExjQz_3uiJbRGTP-mj_SFoJpAlXakJXHrkHnkHW7fL2PrALEBP4rPbp9lOiOnvIIcfbg==> Join Our Mailing List <http://visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1101575717138> *Service Bulletin:* *VP-200 and Dynon SkyView* ** Dynon recently released SkyView 5.1 that added some new data logging features and at the same time affected the interface to the VP-200. If you have a VP-200 and Dynon SkyView installed, please do not upgrade to SkyView 5.1. *This does NOT affect VP-X customers. * We are investigating the issue and will have additional details in the future. Please contact Vertical Power directly (by replying to this e-mail) if you have any questions. <http://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=un&mse=0018OepQbqXwM3gE8xwRBNUfuRpTmwH3UA7&t=001RX2WnHmTjDdy47Le-E_2kg%3D%3D&reason=001IqezpQbqEsU%3D&llr=siapq6bab> <http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=news09> This email was sent to kellym(at)aviating.com by support(at)verticalpower.com | Update Profile/Email Address <http://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=oo&mse=0018OepQbqXwM3gE8xwRBNUfuRpTmwH3UA7&t=001RX2WnHmTjDdy47Le-E_2kg%3D%3D&reason=001IqezpQbqEsU%3D&llr=siapq6bab> | Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe <http://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=un&mse=0018OepQbqXwM3gE8xwRBNUfuRpTmwH3UA7&t=001RX2WnHmTjDdy47Le-E_2kg%3D%3D&reason=001IqezpQbqEsU%3D&llr=siapq6bab>^(TM) | Privacy Policy <http://ui.constantcontact.com/roving/CCPrivacyPolicy.jsp>. Vertical Power| 317 Commercial St, G-102| Albuquerque| NM| 87102 ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Pascal" <rv10flyer(at)live.com>
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Fwd: [MARKETING] VP-200/Dynon SkyView Service
Bulletin
Date: Feb 04, 2013
According to Dynon Support -We only moved a few parameters around in the new serial stream, so it's unfortunate that it will take them months to fix this as it's likely just a few constants in their code to make it work again. Hopefully =9CWe are investigating the issue and will have additional details in the future.=9D means they may release a fix much sooner than the expected Q2 that I was told last Friday. Granted this should not be VP issue, kudos, to Marc for at least providing a fix, even if it is a potential long wait. From: Kelly McMullen Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 12:50 PM Subject: RV10-List: Fwd: [MARKETING] VP-200/Dynon SkyView Service Bulletin Well, at least Vertical Power is listening. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [MARKETING] VP-200/Dynon SkyView Service Bulletin Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:01:09 -0500 (EST) From: Vertical Power Support mailto:support(at)verticalpower.com Reply-To: support(at)verticalpower.com To: kellym(at)aviating.com Having trouble viewing this email? Click Here Service Bulletin - February 2013 See the VP-X See the VP-400 Free! Click Here Click to View On-Line Store Service Bulletin: VP-200 and Dynon SkyView Dynon recently released SkyView 5.1 that added some new data logging features and at the same time affected the interface to the VP-200. If you have a VP-200 and Dynon SkyView installed, please do not upgrade to SkyView 5.1. This does NOT affect VP-X customers. We are investigating the issue and will have additional details in the future. Please contact Vertical Power directly (by replying to this e-mail) if you have any questions. This email was sent to kellym(at)aviating.com by support(at)verticalpower.com | Update Profile/Email Address | Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe=84=A2 | Privacy Policy. Vertical Power | 317 Commercial St, G-102 | Albuquerque | NM | 87102 No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 05, 2013
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: SD-20 Alternator / SB1B-14 regulator failure modes
Looking to see if anyone has ever experienced a failure of either of these two types of units. This is a backup unit be design so a failure might not get noticed - until you need it. My start-up checklist has me powering on the backup unit first, checking for amps generated and the warning light on...then power up the primary unit - I get more amps and the secondary light goes out... Not looking to bad-mouth anyone.....my back-up alternator did not come on-line during my start-up checklist. No biggie - I was going on a local VFR fun flight close enough to get back to home-plate if necessary. Anyone experienced anything with theirs - how did it present? what was the cause? How did you determine / diagnose? What did you do to repair? My line of troubleshooting thinking has me first checking to make sure the unit turns when the engine turns - then looking at the two ckt breakers and finally testing for current at the field wire on the back of the alternator. Thanks, Ralph Capen ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Carl Froehlich <carl.froehlich(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: SD-20 Alternator / SB1B-14 regulator failure modes
Date: Feb 05, 2013
Yep - had a neighbor with a failed unit on his 360 Lancair. After troubleshooting a mess of wiring, I told him to pull the alternator for bench testing. Turns out the alternator rotor shaft sheared at the coupling to the accessory drive gear. I think I remember this being a phenolic piece - but I could be wrong. When are you going to swing by Dogwood? Carl On Feb 5, 2013, at 8:08 AM, "Ralph E. Capen" wrote: > > Looking to see if anyone has ever experienced a failure of either of these two types of units. This is a backup unit be design so a failure might not get noticed - until you need it. My start-up checklist has me powering on the backup unit first, checking for amps generated and the warning light on...then power up the primary unit - I get more amps and the secondary light goes out... > > Not looking to bad-mouth anyone.....my back-up alternator did not come on-line during my start-up checklist. No biggie - I was going on a local VFR fun flight close enough to get back to home-plate if necessary. Anyone experienced anything with theirs - how did it present? what was the cause? How did you determine / diagnose? What did you do to repair? > > My line of troubleshooting thinking has me first checking to make sure the unit turns when the engine turns - then looking at the two ckt breakers and finally testing for current at the field wire on the back of the alternator. > > Thanks, > Ralph Capen > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 05, 2013
Subject: Re: SD-20 Alternator / SB1B-14 regulator failure modes
From: Larry Bowen <larry(at)bowenaero.com>
The one failure I happen to see was when I could turn the unit by hand. I could feel some resistance from the magnets, but not much else. I don't know the final diagnosis of that unit. On Tuesday, February 5, 2013, Ralph E. Capen wrote: > > > > Looking to see if anyone has ever experienced a failure of either of these > two types of units. This is a backup unit be design so a failure might not > get noticed - until you need it. My start-up checklist has me powering on > the backup unit first, checking for amps generated and the warning light > on...then power up the primary unit - I get more amps and the secondary > light goes out... > > Not looking to bad-mouth anyone.....my back-up alternator did not come > on-line during my start-up checklist. No biggie - I was going on a local > VFR fun flight close enough to get back to home-plate if necessary. Anyone > experienced anything with theirs - how did it present? what was the cause? > How did you determine / diagnose? What did you do to repair? > > My line of troubleshooting thinking has me first checking to make sure the > unit turns when the engine turns - then looking at the two ckt breakers and > finally testing for current at the field wire on the back of the alternator. > > Thanks, > Ralph Capen > > -- -- Larry Bowen Larry(at)BowenAero.com http://BowenAero.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 05, 2013
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: SD-20 Alternator / SB1B-14 regulator failure modes
Thanks - the shaft is not metal (IIRC) and is my first step in the diagnostics (after checking the two ckt breakers). Still trying to get my engine re-broke-in. The back-up alternator is keeping me in VMC and within battery-distance to homeplate for now. You're a short hop (over the bay and Pax River) so it's near the top of my list..... -----Original Message----- >From: Carl Froehlich <carl.froehlich(at)verizon.net> >Sent: Feb 5, 2013 10:31 AM >To: "rv-list(at)matronics.com" >Subject: Re: RV-List: SD-20 Alternator / SB1B-14 regulator failure modes > > >Yep - had a neighbor with a failed unit on his 360 Lancair. After troubleshooting a mess of wiring, I told him to pull the alternator for bench testing. Turns out the alternator rotor shaft sheared at the coupling to the accessory drive gear. I think I remember this being a phenolic piece - but I could be wrong. > >When are you going to swing by Dogwood? > >Carl > >On Feb 5, 2013, at 8:08 AM, "Ralph E. Capen" wrote: > >> >> Looking to see if anyone has ever experienced a failure of either of these two types of units. This is a backup unit be design so a failure might not get noticed - until you need it. My start-up checklist has me powering on the backup unit first, checking for amps generated and the warning light on...then power up the primary unit - I get more amps and the secondary light goes out... >> >> Not looking to bad-mouth anyone.....my back-up alternator did not come on-line during my start-up checklist. No biggie - I was going on a local VFR fun flight close enough to get back to home-plate if necessary. Anyone experienced anything with theirs - how did it present? what was the cause? How did you determine / diagnose? What did you do to repair? >> >> My line of troubleshooting thinking has me first checking to make sure the unit turns when the engine turns - then looking at the two ckt breakers and finally testing for current at the field wire on the back of the alternator. >> >> Thanks, >> Ralph Capen >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 06, 2013
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Skyview 5.1 to 5.0 Downgrade Successful...
Dear Listers, Good news. I was able to roll back to Skyview 5.0.0 using a special roll-back file supplied Mike Schofield at Dynon and carefully followed a procedure he outlined to accomplish the task at hand. I am again getting an EMS data feed from the Skyview to the VP-200. I haven't flown or started the engine yet, but I flipped on the Boost pump and saw fuel pressure so that's a good sign. Hopefully Vertical Power will have an update for the VP-200 soon... I had a long phone conversation with Mike Schofield, Marketing Manager at Dynon about the trials and tribulations of late. He was sympathetic to the plight of those of us utilizing their EMS protocol, but didn't seem like they were planning on really doing anything procedurally any different in the future with respect to not compromising the data integrity of the data format for devices such as the VP-200 in the field. I indicated that as a developer of products that might potentially use those protocols, I would be uncomfortable choosing to use those data feeds because of the lack of commitment to their stability and continuity by Dynon. I guess I got my point across. He went on to say that they hadn't intended for the protocol to be used by autonomous devices like the VP-200, but rather foresaw it simply being used as raw data that would be captured and used for post-analysis like with a spreadsheet. I countered that even in those applications, some consistency of format is expected and consumers of the data might very will write scripts and/or code to interpret the data and would be put off by constant format changes. Anyway, Dynon is a small company and they've got a lot on their plate and a lot of customers asking for a lot of different things. I think they get it, but it sometimes takes events like this to show them exactly why these things are important. - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 140+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Andrew Long - AANet" <along(at)aanet.com.au>
Subject: RE: RV10-List: Skyview 5.1 to 5.0 Downgrade Successful...
Date: Feb 07, 2013
Hi All, I would also like to add that here in Australia there is a big discussion around IFR avionics, certification and experimental avionics. One of these areas is the software development protocols. It would be of benefit that a standard protocol was adapted that may enhance the ability of these instruments to be looked at more favourably when it comes to the approval processes in different countries. My view looking at the world at the moment is that Oz is not going to be the last to deal with these issues and the better they are managed, the better the outcomes. PS: This is in no way a dispersion on development, just how we can manage the perception of "Experimental" Andrew. www.ozrv10.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Matt Dralle Sent: Thursday, 7 February 2013 2:18 PM Subject: RV10-List: Skyview 5.1 to 5.0 Downgrade Successful... --> RV10-List message posted by: Matt Dralle Dear Listers, Good news. I was able to roll back to Skyview 5.0.0 using a special roll-back file supplied Mike Schofield at Dynon and carefully followed a procedure he outlined to accomplish the task at hand. I am again getting an EMS data feed from the Skyview to the VP-200. I haven't flown or started the engine yet, but I flipped on the Boost pump and saw fuel pressure so that's a good sign. Hopefully Vertical Power will have an update for the VP-200 soon... I had a long phone conversation with Mike Schofield, Marketing Manager at Dynon about the trials and tribulations of late. He was sympathetic to the plight of those of us utilizing their EMS protocol, but didn't seem like they were planning on really doing anything procedurally any different in the future with respect to not compromising the data integrity of the data format for devices such as the VP-200 in the field. I indicated that as a developer of products that might potentially use those protocols, I would be uncomfortable choosing to use those data feeds because of the lack of commitment to their stability and continuity by Dynon. I guess I got my point across. He went on to say that they hadn't intended for the protocol to be used by autonomous devices like the VP-200, but rather foresaw it simply being used as raw data that would be captured and used for post-analysis like with a spreadsheet. I countered that even in those applications, some consistency of for! mat is expected and consumers of the data might very will write scripts and/or code to interpret the data and would be put off by constant format changes. Anyway, Dynon is a small company and they've got a lot on their plate and a lot of customers asking for a lot of different things. I think they get it, but it sometimes takes events like this to show them exactly why these things are important. - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 140+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 09, 2013
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: SD-20 Alternator / SB1B-14 regulator failure modes - update
In my case, it was the drive gear that goes in to the accessory case. There's a rubber thingy inside that was in a bunch of pieces. The safety catch did it's job so the parts didn't float in to the engine. It all came out together - but it was very obvious that the gear wasn't driving. Anyone know if that is replaceable? Looks like it could be - just maybe not by me.....I'll ask the folks @ B & C. Ralph Capen ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "charlie" <cheathco(at)cox.net>
Subject: Lift reserve indicator
Date: Feb 11, 2013
I have bought one and would like to see a pix of where anyone who has installed one, has put the pickup under the wing. I have a 6A, but Im thinking probably would be same for all models. First thought was to mount it on the inspection plate, what do you think? My email is cheathco(at)cox.net .( pix of glare shield indicator unit would be a plus) Charlie ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 11, 2013
Subject: Re: Lift reserve indicator
From: thomas sargent <sarg314(at)gmail.com>
Charlie: I installed mine in my 6A in the cover for the wing access to the aileron bell crank. The Lift Reserve guy suggested that location. Seems to work there. I should mention that I have a Catto three blade prop, which is 3 inches shorter in radius than most 2 bladed props used on 6A's. That may be important in this regard, but I doubt it. On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:04 AM, charlie wrote: > I have bought one and would like to see a pix of where anyone who has > installed one, has put the pickup under the wing. I have a 6A, but Im > thinking probably would be same for all models. First thought was to mount > it on the inspection plate, what do you think? My email is > cheathco(at)cox.net .( pix of glare shield indicator unit would be a plus) > Charlie > > -- Tom Sargent ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "JohnF" <n29cx(at)ridgeviewtel.us>
Subject: Re: Lift reserve indicator
Date: Feb 11, 2013
I also mounted my RV6A Lift Reserve Indicator on the bell crank inspection plate. I put the "meter" indicator atop the instrument panel cover so that it was within eyesight without moving my head. I could see it just by a slight shift in my eyeballs. I sold the plane and wish I had an LRI in my present plane. It is a great instrument. John ----- Original Message ----- From: thomas sargent To: rv-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 7:47 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: Lift reserve indicator Charlie: I installed mine in my 6A in the cover for the wing access to the aileron bell crank. The Lift Reserve guy suggested that location. Seems to work there. I should mention that I have a Catto three blade prop, which is 3 inches shorter in radius than most 2 bladed props used on 6A's. That may be important in this regard, but I doubt it. On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:04 AM, charlie wrote: I have bought one and would like to see a pix of where anyone who has installed one, has put the pickup under the wing. I have a 6A, but Im thinking probably would be same for all models. First thought was to mount it on the inspection plate, what do you think? My email is cheathco(at)cox.net .( pix of glare shield indicator unit would be a plus) Charlie -- Tom Sargent ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dale Ensing" <densing(at)carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Lift reserve indicator
Date: Feb 11, 2013
I also put the pick-up on the inspection plate at the aileron bellcrank. I did add a doubler plate to the inspection plate in the immediate area of the mounting. My meter is in the panel just below the glare-shield over hang but still in the field of vision. Would not change anything. Dale ----- Original Message ----- From: JohnF To: rv-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 10:02 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: Lift reserve indicator I also mounted my RV6A Lift Reserve Indicator on the bell crank inspection plate. I put the "meter" indicator atop the instrument panel cover so that it was within eyesight without moving my head. I could see it just by a slight shift in my eyeballs. I sold the plane and wish I had an LRI in my present plane. It is a great instrument. John ----- Original Message ----- From: thomas sargent To: rv-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 7:47 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: Lift reserve indicator Charlie: I installed mine in my 6A in the cover for the wing access to the aileron bell crank. The Lift Reserve guy suggested that location. Seems to work there. I should mention that I have a Catto three blade prop, which is 3 inches shorter in radius than most 2 bladed props used on 6A's. That may be important in this regard, but I doubt it. On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:04 AM, charlie wrote: I have bought one and would like to see a pix of where anyone who has installed one, has put the pickup under the wing. I have a 6A, but Im thinking probably would be same for all models. First thought was to mount it on the inspection plate, what do you think? My email is cheathco(at)cox.net .( pix of glare shield indicator unit would be a plus) Charlie -- Tom Sargent href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List">http://www.matronics. com/Navigator?RV-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 11, 2013
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: SD-20 Alternator / SB1B-14 regulator failure modes
As a follow up to my recent failure. The issue ended up being the gear coupling in the alternator. The gear coupling is a field replaceable item and I have one on the way. More when it happens.... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack" <wmjack1(at)t3cs.net>
Subject: External Flight Plans - Dynon Skyview/Garmin 696
Date: Feb 12, 2013
Matt, Thank you for sharing this Dynon email exchange with list readers. I act as the newsletter editor for EAA chapter 166 (KHFD) <http://www.166.eaachapter.org/> and am (very slowly) building a -9A. I would like your permission to use some excerpts from your exchange in an article for our <http://www.166.eaachapter.org/apps/documents/> newsletter as a cautionary note for builders not conversant with the potential pitfalls of systems integration. I spent many years at sea and learned early on to treat all electronics and buoyage as "aids to navigation" only rather than a 'magic wand' that would get you home no matter what. Batteries fail; buoys get moved off station by ice flows or other weather phenomena; electronic components go out of spec for no apparent reason, etc. When lack of common 'lingua franca' (e.g. EDI) between devices, non-adherence to APIs, or lack of an API in the first place, get tossed into the mix, bad things can happen as you point out. Again, thanks for sharing. Regards, Jack Jack Hilditch Newsletter Editor EAA Chapter 166 Hartford, CT (KHFD) Cell 860-729-6948 wmjack(at)t3cs.net _____ From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Matt Dralle Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 5:55 PM Subject: RV-List: External Flight Plans - Dynon Skyview/Garmin 696 Dear Listers, Below is a dialog that I'm currently having with Dynon technical support regarding the support for External Flight Plans on the Dynon Skyview. I have a Garmin 696 connected serially to the Dynon and use it for primary GPS positional data. I would like to also have it transfer the current flight plan data as its a LOT easier to look up remote airports, etc. on the Garmin696. But, for some reason, the flight plan data doesn't seem to propagate to the Skyview; I can only assume because the Dynon is ignoring the GPRMB NMEA0182 data fields. In contrast, I have a King Skymap IIIc connected to the GRT HXs in the RV-8 (for testing) and I am able to easily get external flight plan data from the Skymap to the GRT HX over the serial line (see screen shots) Finally, with the new ADSB receiver on the Skyview, I'm no longer getting Traffic data on the Garmin 696. With just the Mode S transponder, I get traffic targets when I'm in traffic areas so the TIS data link (Skyvew->Garmin696) seems to be working. But as soon as I enable the ADSB receiver, I no longer get the traffic on the Garmin 696 even though the ADSB traffic is showing up on the Skyview Map and PDF displays. Below are some composite screen shots I made for Dynon with embedded comments and documentation to describe what I'm seeing. I thought I'd share with the rest of the group in case someone maybe had some feedback or thoughts. - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 120+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode At 10:36 AM 2/1/2013 Friday, you wrote: Matt, Please do send some screen shots. We will fly a flight plan from the Garmin. Do you see the CDI on the HSI? I can make sense out of this with a picture. Mike H Dynon Avionics Technical Support support(at)dynonavionics.com Phone: 425-402-0433 - 07:00-17:00 Pacific weekdays --- -----Original Message----- From: "Matt Dralle" <dralle(at)matronics.com> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 10:01:39 -0800 Cc: "dralle(at)matronics.com" , "michael Woolson" Subject: Re: (Case 117228) Garmin GPS696 Input to Skyview >Hi Mike, > >That's not what I'm talking about. What I mean is when I go into the Garmin and enter in a flight plan. For example, KLVK to KEDU to KMRY. These destinations are being transmitted by the Garmin over the NMEA 0183 serial output but the Skyview isn't using them. I have to go into the Skyview and reenter the destinations. > >In contrast, on my Garmin to GRT HX installation, if I have a flight plan entered into the Garmin, that information is picked up and used by the GRT HX. If I don't have a flight plan on the Garmin, then the GRT HX uses whatever I enter in on the GRT HX. I can sent you some screen shots if you want. > >Matt > >At 09:26 AM 2/1/2013 Friday, you wrote: > Hi Mike, Please see that attached two images. The first describes what I'm seeing on the Dynon/Garmin696 and the second shows what I'm getting on the GRT HX/SkymapIIIc. The third shot is of my Dynon and Garmin 696 configuration. Note that with the Dynon, there's no external flight plan data utiliation. Note on the GRT, there is full external flight plan data utilization. I've included the NMEA0183 data strings that include the flight plan data. Also note, the lack of ADSB traffic on the Garmin 696 when the ADSB is enabled. With the ADSB DISABLED, the Mode S traffic appears. Emacs! Emacs! Emacs! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Subject: N880EE Exposed
Date: Feb 16, 2013
RV List I recently posted a First Flight on the Vans site and VAF. I thought I woul d share it with those on this list that didn't already know about 85. Robin http://www.vansairforce.com/community/showthread.php?p=744277 http://www.vansaircraft.com/public/first-flights.htm More photos can be seen at: http://www.painttheweb.com/painttheweb/RV-8A/ HD Video can be seen at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJ912gZyQ0U&feature=share&list=UU33RvU l-OACUdX3XIljn26w ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 15, 2013
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Re: N880EE Exposed
At 07:59 PM 2/15/2013 Friday, Robin Marks wrote: >RV List >I recently posted a First Flight on the Vans site and VAF. I thought I would share it with those on this list that didnt already know about 85. >Robin > > ><http://www.vansairforce.com/community/showthread.php?p=744277>http://www.vansairforce.com/community/showthread.php?p=744277 > >http://www.vansaircraft.com/public/first-flights.htm > > >More photos can be seen at: ><http://www.painttheweb.com/painttheweb/RV-8A/>http://www.painttheweb.com/painttheweb/RV-8A/ > >HD Video can be seen at: ><http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJ912gZyQ0U&feature=share&list=UU33RvUl-OACUdX3XIljn26w>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJ912gZyQ0U&feature=share&list=UU33RvUl-OACUdX3XIljn26w > VERY nice, Robin! Your workmanship is exquisite thorough out. Love the instrument panel! The paint-job quality looks absolutely fantastic. Who did the paint and airbrush work? Well done! - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 140+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 18, 2013
From: Jim Brown <acrojim7534(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Jim Brown
http://adulttoysstore.org/wp-content/themes/midnight/images/freelife.php?kqigg ++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The unleashed power of the atom has changed everything save our modes of thinking and we thus drift toward unparalleled catastrophe. Jim Brown ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 25, 2013
From: James Bean <jimbean6(at)optimum.net>
Subject: Parking brake check valve
I have misplaced the drawing on the dual check valve used for a parking brake on our RV's. I have a hazy recollection that the lever is perpendicular to the fluid flow when the check valves are operating. Anyone have this information or a steer to where I could download the drawing? thanks Jim Bean RV-8 81110 MN ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 25, 2013
From: Ed Godfrey <egodfrey(at)ameritech.net>
Subject: Re: Parking brake check valve
Jim, If you are referring to the Matco parking brake valve, you can find the information at http://www.matcomfg.com/PARKINGBRAKEVALVEDUAL-idv-3579-8.html Ed Godfrey 40717 On 2/25/2013 3:29 PM, James Bean wrote: > > I have misplaced the drawing on the dual check valve used for a > parking brake on our RV's. > I have a hazy recollection that the lever is perpendicular to the > fluid flow when the check valves are operating. > Anyone have this information or a steer to where I could download the > drawing? > thanks > Jim Bean > RV-8 81110 MN > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 25, 2013
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Parking brake check valve
Which valve? If I recall correctly, there are two. I have one installed on my 6A - don't remember the brand though. I'll see if I can dig out the documentation. Ralph -----Original Message----- >From: James Bean <jimbean6(at)optimum.net> >Sent: Feb 25, 2013 4:29 PM >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV-List: Parking brake check valve > > >I have misplaced the drawing on the dual check valve used for a parking >brake on our RV's. >I have a hazy recollection that the lever is perpendicular to the fluid >flow when the check valves are operating. >Anyone have this information or a steer to where I could download the >drawing? >thanks >Jim Bean >RV-8 81110 MN > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 25, 2013
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Parking brake check valve
This is not the one that I have - I'll continue looking. -----Original Message----- >From: Ed Godfrey <egodfrey(at)ameritech.net> >Sent: Feb 25, 2013 4:39 PM >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV-List: Parking brake check valve > > >Jim, > If you are referring to the Matco parking brake valve, you can find >the information at > >http://www.matcomfg.com/PARKINGBRAKEVALVEDUAL-idv-3579-8.html > >Ed Godfrey >40717 > >On 2/25/2013 3:29 PM, James Bean wrote: >> >> I have misplaced the drawing on the dual check valve used for a >> parking brake on our RV's. >> I have a hazy recollection that the lever is perpendicular to the >> fluid flow when the check valves are operating. >> Anyone have this information or a steer to where I could download the >> drawing? >> thanks >> Jim Bean >> RV-8 81110 MN >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 25, 2013
Subject: Re: Parking brake check valve
From: Dave Saylor <dave.saylor.aircrafters(at)gmail.com>
Generally the lever blocks flow when it's perpendicular to the line, open when it's parallel. I recall that it doesn't require a full 90* motion to open the valve. It's most likely either made by Matco or Grove. On Monday, February 25, 2013, James Bean wrote: > > I have misplaced the drawing on the dual check valve used for a parking > brake on our RV's. > I have a hazy recollection that the lever is perpendicular to the fluid > flow when the check valves are operating. > Anyone have this information or a steer to where I could download the > drawing? > thanks > Jim Bean > RV-8 81110 MN > > -- Dave Saylor 831-750-0284 CL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 25, 2013
From: Ed Holyoke <bicyclop(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: Parking brake check valve
The Matco valve that I have, earlier version than the one on the Matco site, wants the lever at 45 degrees to the body for both open and closed positions. I verified this by blowing through it while operating the lever. This orientation makes it easier to rig the cable, too. Make sure you have positive stops at both positions. Somebody I know didn't and the fire dept wound up opening his bleeder valves to get him off the taxiway so the jets could get by when he couldn't release the brakes. Ed Holyoke On 2/25/2013 3:19 PM, Dave Saylor wrote: > Generally the lever blocks flow when it's perpendicular to the line, > open when it's parallel. I recall that it doesn't require a full 90* > motion to open the valve. It's most likely either made by Matco or Grove. > > On Monday, February 25, 2013, James Bean wrote: > > > I have misplaced the drawing on the dual check valve used for a > parking brake on our RV's. > I have a hazy recollection that the lever is perpendicular to the > fluid flow when the check valves are operating. > Anyone have this information or a steer to where I could download > the drawing? > thanks > Jim Bean > RV-8 81110 MN > > =================================== > target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List > =================================== > MS - > k">http://forums.matronics.com > =================================== > e - > -Matt Dralle, List Admin. > t="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > =================================== > > > -- > Dave Saylor > 831-750-0284 CL > * > > > * ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Parking brake check valve
From: Bobby Hester <bobbyhester(at)twc.com>
Date: Feb 25, 2013
Here is my Matco parking brake https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/QZey-IEOJoYkfSdPBSRF4tMTjNZETYmyPJy0li ipFm0?feat=directlink Sent from my Verizon iPhone On Feb 25, 2013, at 3:29 PM, James Bean wrote: > > I have misplaced the drawing on the dual check valve used for a parking br ake on our RV's. > I have a hazy recollection that the lever is perpendicular to the fluid fl ow when the check valves are operating. > Anyone have this information or a steer to where I could download the draw ing? > thanks > Jim Bean > RV-8 81110 MN > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Parking brake check valve
From: Bobby Hester <bobbyhester(at)twc.com>
Date: Feb 25, 2013
Here is their newer model https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/FAuf5mb-Ct5eGfu10tZjrtMTjNZETYmyPJy0li ipFm0?feat=directlink Sent from my Verizon iPhone On Feb 25, 2013, at 3:29 PM, James Bean wrote: > > I have misplaced the drawing on the dual check valve used for a parking br ake on our RV's. > I have a hazy recollection that the lever is perpendicular to the fluid fl ow when the check valves are operating. > Anyone have this information or a steer to where I could download the draw ing? > thanks > Jim Bean > RV-8 81110 MN > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Parking brake check valve
From: vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Feb 25, 2013
Attached is the drawing of the Parker Cleveland Valve that I have. -GV -----Original Message----- From: Ralph E. Capen <recapen(at)earthlink.net> Sent: Mon, Feb 25, 2013 2:15 pm Subject: Re: RV-List: Parking brake check valve This is not the one that I have - I'll continue looking. -----Original Message----- >From: Ed Godfrey <egodfrey(at)ameritech.net> >Sent: Feb 25, 2013 4:39 PM >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV-List: Parking brake check valve > > >Jim, > If you are referring to the Matco parking brake valve, you can find >the information at > >http://www.matcomfg.com/PARKINGBRAKEVALVEDUAL-idv-3579-8.html > >Ed Godfrey >40717 > >On 2/25/2013 3:29 PM, James Bean wrote: >> >> I have misplaced the drawing on the dual check valve used for a >> parking brake on our RV's. >> I have a hazy recollection that the lever is perpendicular to the >> fluid flow when the check valves are operating. >> Anyone have this information or a steer to where I could download the >> drawing? >> thanks >> Jim Bean >> RV-8 81110 MN >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 26, 2013
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Parking brake check valve
This is the one I have - thanks Gary! -----Original Message----- From: vanremog(at)aol.com Sent: Feb 25, 2013 10:23 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Parking brake check valve Attached is the drawing of the Parker Cleveland Valve that I have. -GV -----Original Message----- From: Ralph E. Capen <recapen(at)earthlink.net> Sent: Mon, Feb 25, 2013 2:15 pm Subject: Re: RV-List: Parking brake check valve This is not the one that I have - I'll continue looking. -----Original Message----- >From: Ed Godfrey <egodfrey(at)ameritech.net> >Sent: Feb 25, 2013 4:39 PM >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV-List: Parking brake check valve > > >Jim, > If you are referring to the Matco parking brake valve, you can find >the information at > >http://www.matcomfg.com/PARKINGBRAKEVALVEDUAL-idv-3579-8.html > >Ed Godfrey >40717 > >On 2/25/2013 3:29 PM, James Bean wrote: >> >> I have misplaced the drawing on the dual check valve used for a >> parking brake on our RV's. >> I have a hazy recollection that the lever is perpendicular to the >> fluid flow when the check valves are operating. >> Anyone have this information or a steer to where I could download the >> drawing? >> thanks >> Jim Bean >> RV-8 81110 MN >> >> >> >> >> > > t="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 26, 2013
From: James Bean <jimbean6(at)optimum.net>
Subject: Parking brake check valve
Thanks all for the replies. I think I have the older model, have to look in the AC. I haven't fabricated a linkage for it, have just been using the lever. It seems that some hard landings can move the lever and give surprise braking. It looks like the new one allows the lever to be moved around. The reason for my not putting on a proper linkage is that the lever was moving opposite to a convenient cable hook up, I.E. would require a pull to release the brakes. I think that the next project is to put on the new valve and a cable. thanks again regards Jim Bean RV-8 N99JA 81110 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 26, 2013
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Parking brake check valve
Jim, Here's mine..... Hope this helps..... Ralph -----Original Message----- >From: James Bean <jimbean6(at)optimum.net> >Sent: Feb 26, 2013 3:15 PM >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV-List: Parking brake check valve > > >Thanks all for the replies. >I think I have the older model, have to look in the AC. I haven't >fabricated a linkage for it, have just been using the lever. >It seems that some hard landings can move the lever and give surprise >braking. >It looks like the new one allows the lever to be moved around. The >reason for my not putting on a proper linkage >is that the lever was moving opposite to a convenient cable hook up, >I.E. would require a pull to release the brakes. >I think that the next project is to put on the new valve and a cable. >thanks again >regards Jim Bean >RV-8 N99JA 81110 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 26, 2013
From: Ed Holyoke <bicyclop(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: Parking brake check valve
Use a locking or ratcheting cable so vibration doesn't move it. Put it on your side of the cabin so mate doesn't think it's for heat. You can use the outer cable as the stop on one end and set the other end to be brakes released when the knob is full forward. Ed Holyoke On 2/26/2013 12:15 PM, James Bean wrote: > > Thanks all for the replies. > I think I have the older model, have to look in the AC. I haven't > fabricated a linkage for it, have just been using the lever. > It seems that some hard landings can move the lever and give surprise > braking. > It looks like the new one allows the lever to be moved around. The > reason for my not putting on a proper linkage > is that the lever was moving opposite to a convenient cable hook up, > I.E. would require a pull to release the brakes. > I think that the next project is to put on the new valve and a cable. > thanks again > regards Jim Bean > RV-8 N99JA 81110 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Bill Judge <bjudge(at)gmail.com>
Date: Mar 01, 2013
Subject: Fwd: PGUM to KJAX
Fellow homebuilders: This is too good not to pass along. Bill Harrelson is flying direct in a Lancair 4(no turbo, no pressurization) from Guam to Jacksonville FL. He has built this plane specifically to break records. I haven't spoken with him in a while but I'm guessing this flight breaks some sort of record. Simply amazing. Bill ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Bill Harrelson Hi, Bill just took off from Guam headed for Jacksonville, FL. It should take between 33 and 34 hours, depending on winds. You can follow on FlightAware (which is off by 24 hours) or Spidertracks. go.spidertracks.com/fleetpro/public/zqpilot Thanks, Sue ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 01, 2013
Subject: Re: Fwd: PGUM to KJAX
From: David Leonard <wdleonard(at)gmail.com>
Wow, that is pretty impressive. He is almost over CONUS now. Well done, strong bladder! Rodoc On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Bill Judge wrote: > Fellow homebuilders: > This is too good not to pass along. > > Bill Harrelson is flying direct in a Lancair 4(no turbo, no > pressurization) from Guam to Jacksonville FL. > > He has built this plane specifically to break records. I haven't spoken > with him in a while but I'm guessing this flight breaks some sort of record. > > Simply amazing. > > Bill > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Bill Harrelson > > > Hi, > > Bill just took off from Guam headed for Jacksonville, FL. It should take > between 33 and 34 hours, > depending on winds. You can follow on FlightAware (which is off by 24 > hours) or Spidertracks. > > go.spidertracks.com/fleetpro/public/zqpilot > > Thanks, > > Sue > > * > > * > > -- David Leonard Turbo Rotary RV-6 N4VY http://N4VY.RotaryRoster.net http://RotaryRoster.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ken Cantrell" <kcflyrv(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Fwd: PGUM to KJAX
Date: Mar 02, 2013
Wow! Congratulations!!! He made it! Hooray for Bill!!! From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Judge Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 9:33 PM Subject: RV-List: Fwd: PGUM to KJAX Fellow homebuilders: This is too good not to pass along. Bill Harrelson is flying direct in a Lancair 4(no turbo, no pressurization) from Guam to Jacksonville FL. He has built this plane specifically to break records. I haven't spoken with him in a while but I'm guessing this flight breaks some sort of record. Simply amazing. Bill ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Bill Harrelson Hi, Bill just took off from Guam headed for Jacksonville, FL. It should take between 33 and 34 hours, depending on winds. You can follow on FlightAware (which is off by 24 hours) or Spidertracks. go.spidertracks.com/fleetpro/public/zqpilot Thanks, Sue ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 04, 2013
Subject: Infinity stick graphics
From: Christopher Cee Stone <rv8iator(at)gmail.com>
RVer's et al... I am doing placards for my -8 cockpit and noticed on Matt Dralle's post of his -8 interior he had a graphic of the Infinity stick grip with switch IDs. Does anyone have this as a .dwg or even a PDF? Looking not to have to re-invent the wheel... Chris Stone RV-8 Newberg, OR ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 04, 2013
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Re: Infinity stick graphics
At 11:11 AM 3/4/2013 Monday, you wrote: >RVer's et al... > >I am doing placards for my -8 cockpit and noticed on Matt Dralle's post of his -8 interior he had a graphic of the Infinity stick grip with switch IDs. Does anyone have this as a .dwg or even a PDF? > >Looking not to have to re-invent the wheel... > >Chris Stone >RV-8 Newberg, OR I drew that placecard myself in Corel Designer and had it printed at a local graphics shop. Originally I had it silk screened. Let me see what I've got. I can probably save it in a variety of different formats. Here's the original entry from my Log: http://www.mattsrv8.com/users/display_log.php?user=MattsRV8&project=638&category=2971&log008&row=38 - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 140+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 04, 2013
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Re: Infinity stick graphics (CAD Templates)
At 02:49 PM 3/4/2013 Monday, you wrote: > >At 11:11 AM 3/4/2013 Monday, you wrote: >>RVer's et al... >> >>I am doing placards for my -8 cockpit and noticed on Matt Dralle's post of his -8 interior he had a graphic of the Infinity stick grip with switch IDs. Does anyone have this as a .dwg or even a PDF? >> >>Looking not to have to re-invent the wheel... >> >>Chris Stone >>RV-8 Newberg, OR > > >I drew that placecard myself in Corel Designer and had it printed at a local graphics shop. Originally I had it silk screened. > >Let me see what I've got. I can probably save it in a variety of different formats. > >Here's the original entry from my Log: > >http://www.mattsrv8.com/users/display_log.php?user=MattsRV8&project=638&category=2971&log008&row=38 Here is a zip file that contains a variety of templates for the silkscreen and layout I used. http://www.matronics.com/MattsRV8/Silkscreen-InfinityStickGrip.zip - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 140+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 04, 2013
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Re: Infinity stick graphics
At 03:29 PM 3/4/2013 Monday, you wrote: >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "R. curtis" > > >>I drew that placecard myself in Corel Designer and had it printed at a local graphics shop. Originally I had it silk screened. >> >>Let me see what I've got. I can probably save it in a variety of different formats. >> >>Here's the original entry from my Log: >> >>http://www.mattsrv8.com/users/display_log.php?user=MattsRV8&project=638&category=2971&log008&row=38 > > > Matt, > > I get this when I try to open: Unable to find a work log with the specified id or no id was specified. > > Roger Sorry, fat-fingered the URL. Here is the correct one: http://www.mattsrv8.com/users/display_log.php?user=MattsRV8&project=638&category=2971&log=166114&row=38 Matt - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 140+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 08, 2013
From: Larry Mersek <1rv6flyer(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Fly-In Announcement
RV flyers and builders, Calaveras Airport Fly-In/Open House this year is Saturday April 20th. As always we welcome the great turn out of RV's flying in for this event and are looking forward to another great year! --Larry Mersek N336RV <http://www.eaa484.org/>www.eaa484.org EAA 484 serving a delicious Tri-Tip BBQ lunch Harmony Ranch serving a full breakfast Lions Club serving fabulous grilled bratwurst Music provided by the Calaveras Community Band Classic cars and Aircraft on static display Scenic $5 & $10 airplane rides Event Info: Kathy Zancanella (209) 736-2501 kz(at)mlode.com Airport Info: <http://co.calaveras.ca.us/cc/Departments/Administration/Airport.aspx>http://co.calaveras.ca.us/cc/Departments/Administration/Airport.aspx http://www.airnav.com/airport/CPU ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Need RV-8 empannage inventory sheet
From: Michael Kraus <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net>
Date: Mar 10, 2013
Does anyone have an RV-8 empannage inventory sheet they can email me? Old or new are fine. Thank you! -Mike Kraus RV-4 sold :-( RV-10 flying :-) KitFox SS7 Radial building :-) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 11, 2013
From: Charles Kuss <chaskuss(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Fw: Validate Your Yahoo! Email Address [Trojan Horse]
This is one way that people get a virus infection on their computer. This e mail is NOT from Yahoo. If you respond to it, you WILL get infected. Charlie Kuss PS I had to delete the web link provided in the original "nasty" email, as Yahoo's spam filters spotted it and blocked my ability to send this warning From: Yahoo! Alert <source(at)rewardsforjustice.net> Subject: Validate Your Yahoo! Email Address Date: Monday, March 11, 2013, 6:07 AM =0A=0A=0A =0A=0A=0A=0ADear Customer, =0A =0AYour E-mail=0Aaccount has exceeded its limit and needs to be verified, I f not=0Averified within-24hrs, we shall=0Aterminate your account. =0A =0A =0A =0AThanks. =0A=0A=0A ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 13, 2013
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Re: GPS Shelf FWF
At 11:55 AM 3/12/2013 Tuesday, you wrote: >Someone on the RV-10 list shared a photo of their GPS shelf mounted FWF that had 4+ GPS antenna mounted. I recall the shelf was painted black and connected the firewall with the motor mount? Can the owner share the photo again with the group? I need something similar for my 8A and cannot locate the post. > >Thanks, >Robin Hi Robin, Here are some pictures of how I did the GPS antenna installations on my RV-8. Works great. Blast tubes keeps them cool. No unsightly pucks on the dash! Matt - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 140+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 14, 2013
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Re: RV8a baffles
At 06:23 PM 3/13/2013 Wednesday, you wrote: >--> RV8-List message posted by: Dennis Fox > >nearing completion of FWFD, having trouble visualizing the baffle seal plan around the front of the top cowling. I have the Van's cowling and IO-360 angle valve engine. If anyone has good pics showing how to fit the seals to stop the air flow in the upper front center area, I would appreciate seeing them. Hi Dennis, I've got an IO-390 with a front-mounted prop governor, but the seal layout is about the same. Attached are some pictures of how I did mine. I had no problems with CHT or EGTs. - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 140+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Panama Red" <panamared505(at)brier.net>
Subject: Re: RV8a baffles
Date: Mar 14, 2013
Matt I am impressed. Great work. Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Dralle" <dralle(at)matronics.com> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:55 AM Subject: RV-List: Re: RV8a baffles > At 06:23 PM 3/13/2013 Wednesday, you wrote: >>--> RV8-List message posted by: Dennis Fox >> >>nearing completion of FWFD, having trouble visualizing the baffle seal >>plan around the front of the top cowling. I have the Van's cowling and >>IO-360 angle valve engine. If anyone has good pics showing how to fit the >>seals to stop the air flow in the upper front center area, I would >>appreciate seeing them. > > Hi Dennis, > > I've got an IO-390 with a front-mounted prop governor, but the seal layout > is about the same. Attached are some pictures of how I did mine. I had > no problems with CHT or EGTs. > > > - > Matt Dralle > > RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" > http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log > http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log > http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel > Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... > > RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" > http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log > Status: 140+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer > Mode > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich(at)verizon.net>
Subject: FW: Bill's polar flight - not RV related
Date: Mar 14, 2013
A neighbor at Dogwood (VA42) took off this morning to circumnavigate the globe, via the poles. Bill broke the distance record a couple of weeks ago, flying non-stop from Guam to Jacksonville Florida. His modified Lancair 4 holds 360 gallons of fuel, and the inherently efficient design allows him to cruise at 180 knots averaging less than 9gph fuel burn. Use the below link to follow his flight. He is up linking a data point every four minutes. His first refuel is southern Brazil, then the southern tip of Argentina, from there over the South Pole to New Zealand, then Hawaii, Fairbanks, then over the North Pole back to Bangor Maine. Carl Begin forwarded message: From: sh < <mailto:kitplanesue(at)gmail.com> kitplanesue(at)gmail.com> Subject: Bill's polar flight Good morning, In case you're interested in following Bill's attempt to fly around both poles, here's the web link: https://go.spidertracks.com/fleetpro/public/zqpilot There are 4 small icons at the top left, the airplane icon puts a panel at the left that shows what ZQ is doing. Use the plus to zoom in or the minus to zoom out. You use the pile of papers icon to determine the view. Try hybrid view. If you click the X, it will take you to a screen where you select Tracks and then click on the top latest date. Once he's flying this will get you Bill's track as it is reported by Spidertracks. (it also shows him taxiing while on the ground) You must click on the last little teardrop to get his latest position info in a box on the screen. As he gets closer to some interesting landmarks you can zoom in. Let's all keep our fingers crossed for a safe journey, Sue ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 17, 2013
From: HCRV6(at)comcast.net
Subject: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for RV-6
Has anyone out there got or know of and old style Vertical stab and rudder for an RV-6, kit or any stage of completion, that they want to part with. I think a -4 would also work. A friend of mine is building a -6and does not want to use the new larger RV-8 style vertical tail. Either reply here or call Bob Gorman directly at 408-828-6727 Harry Crosby RV-6 N16CX, 1060 hours ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Marty Helller <marty_away(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for RV-6
Date: Mar 17, 2013
You might want to advise your buddy that Vans made a larger tail for a rea son: especially if its a tail dragger or he puts in an engine larger than t he 160 hp. Even with the Rv-7 larger tail=2C I can't add full power until the tail is off the ground... Marty RV-7 75 hours Date: Sun=2C 17 Mar 2013 00:08:25 +0000 From: HCRV6(at)comcast.net Subject: RV-List: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for RV-6 Has anyone out there got or know of and old style Vertical stab and rudder for an RV-6=2C kit or any stage of completion=2C that they want to part wit h. I think a -4 would also work. A friend of mine is building a -6and doe s not want to use the new larger RV-8 style vertical tail. Either reply here or call Bob Gorman directly at 408-828-6727 Harry Crosby RV-6 N16CX=2C 1060 hours ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: =?utf-8?Q?RE:_RV-List:_Looking_for_old_style_vertical_stab_and_rudder_for?=
=?utf-8?Q?_RV-6?
Date: Mar 17, 2013
From: "R.C. Flyer" <smirdrv(at)hotmail.com>
V2hhdOKAmXMgdGhpcyBhYm91dCBhIGxhcmdlciB0YWlsIGZvciB0aGUgLTY/IEnigJltIGN1cnJl bnRseSB3b3JraW5nIG9uIG15IEZ1c2UgZm9yIHRoZSAtNiBhbmQgaXTigJlzIGEgVGFpbCBkcmFn Z2VyLiBJIGhhdmUgdGhlIG9yaWdpbmFsIFRhaWwgU2VjdGlvbiB0aGF0IEkgYnVpbHQgc2V2ZXJh bCB5ZWFycyBhZ28uICBIb3cgY3JpdGljYWwgaXMgdGhpcyBuZXcgdGFpbCBtb2QgZm9yIHRoZSB0 YWlsIHdoZWVsIHZlcnNpb24/ICBJcyB0aGlzIGluZm8gb24gdGhlIHdlYiBzaWdodCBvciBjYW4g aXQgYmUgZm91bmQgaGVyZSBvbiB0aGUgZm9ydW0/DQoNClIuQy4NCg0KIA0KDQpGcm9tOiBNYXJ0 eSBIZWxsbGVyDQpTZW50OiDigI5NYXJjaOKAjiDigI4xNuKAjiwg4oCOMjAxMyDigI424oCOOuKA jjQz4oCOIOKAjlBNDQpUbzogcnYtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSRTogUlYt TGlzdDogTG9va2luZyBmb3Igb2xkIHN0eWxlIHZlcnRpY2FsIHN0YWIgYW5kIHJ1ZGRlciBmb3Ig UlYtNg0KDQoNCg0KWW91IG1pZ2h0IHdhbnQgdG8gYWR2aXNlIHlvdXIgYnVkZHkgdGhhdCBWYW5z ICBtYWRlIGEgbGFyZ2VyIHRhaWwgZm9yIGEgcmVhc29uOiBlc3BlY2lhbGx5IGlmIGl0cyBhIHRh aWwgZHJhZ2dlciBvciBoZSBwdXRzIGluIGFuIGVuZ2luZSBsYXJnZXIgdGhhbiB0aGUgMTYwIGhw Lg0KDQpFdmVuIHdpdGggdGhlIFJ2LTcgbGFyZ2VyIHRhaWwsIEkgY2FuJ3QgYWRkIGZ1bGwgcG93 ZXIgdW50aWwgdGhlIHRhaWwgaXMgb2ZmIHRoZSBncm91bmQuLi4NCg0KTWFydHkNClJWLTcgNzUg aG91cnMNCg0KDQoNCkRhdGU6IFN1biwgMTcgTWFyIDIwMTMgMDA6MDg6MjUgKzAwMDANCkZyb206 IEhDUlY2QGNvbWNhc3QubmV0DQpUbzogUlYtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBS Vi1MaXN0OiBMb29raW5nIGZvciBvbGQgc3R5bGUgdmVydGljYWwgc3RhYiBhbmQgcnVkZGVyIGZv ciBSVi02DQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KSGFzIGFueW9uZSBvdXQgdGhlcmUgZ290IG9yIGtub3cgb2YgYW5k IG9sZCBzdHlsZSBWZXJ0aWNhbCBzdGFiIGFuZCBydWRkZXIgZm9yIGFuIFJWLTYsIGtpdCBvciBh bnkgc3RhZ2Ugb2YgY29tcGxldGlvbiwgdGhhdCB0aGV5IHdhbnQgdG8gcGFydCB3aXRoLiAgSSB0 aGluayBhIC00IHdvdWxkIGFsc28gd29yay4gIEEgZnJpZW5kIG9mIG1pbmUgaXMgYnVpbGRpbmcg YSAtNmFuZCBkb2VzIG5vdCB3YW50IHRvIHVzZSB0aGUgbmV3IGxhcmdlciBSVi04IHN0eWxlIHZl cnRpY2FsIHRhaWwuDQoNCkVpdGhlciByZXBseSBoZXJlIG9yIGNhbGwgQm9iIEdvcm1hbiBkaXJl Y3RseSBhdCA0MDgtODI4LTY3MjcNCg0KDQpIYXJyeSBDcm9zYnkNClJWLTYgTjE2Q1gsIDEwNjAg aG91cnMNCg0KDQoNCg0KdCIgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiPmh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNv bS9OYXZpZ2F0b3I/UlYtTGlzdA0KbGFuayI+aHR0cDovL2ZvcnVtcy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tDQpy Z2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiPmh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9jb250cmlidXRpb24NCg0KDQoN Cg0KXy09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT0NCl8tPSAgICAgICAgICAtIFRoZSBSVi1MaXN0IEVtYWlsIEZvcnVtIC0NCl8tPSBV c2UgdGhlIE1hdHJvbmljcyBMaXN0IEZlYXR1cmVzIE5hdmlnYXRvciB0byBicm93c2UNCl8tPSB0 aGUgbWFueSBMaXN0IHV0aWxpdGllcyBzdWNoIGFzIExpc3QgVW4vU3Vic2NyaXB0aW9uLA0KXy09 IEFyY2hpdmUgU2VhcmNoICYgRG93bmxvYWQsIDctRGF5IEJyb3dzZSwgQ2hhdCwgRkFRLA0KXy09 IFBob3Rvc2hhcmUsIGFuZCBtdWNoIG11Y2ggbW9yZToNCl8tPQ0KXy09ICAgLS0+IGh0dHA6Ly93 d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9OYXZpZ2F0b3I/UlYtTGlzdA0KXy09DQpfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ0KXy09ICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgLSBNQVRST05JQ1MgV0VCIEZPUlVNUyAtDQpfLT0gU2FtZSBncmVhdCBjb250ZW50 IGFsc28gYXZhaWxhYmxlIHZpYSB0aGUgV2ViIEZvcnVtcyENCl8tPQ0KXy09ICAgLS0+IGh0dHA6 Ly9mb3J1bXMubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbQ0KXy09DQpfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ0KXy09ICAgICAgICAgICAgIC0gTGlz dCBDb250cmlidXRpb24gV2ViIFNpdGUgLQ0KXy09ICBUaGFuayB5b3UgZm9yIHlvdXIgZ2VuZXJv dXMgc3VwcG9ydCENCl8tPSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIC1NYXR0IERyYWxs ZSwgTGlzdCBBZG1pbi4NCl8tPSAgIC0tPiBodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vY29udHJp YnV0aW9uDQpfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ= ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 16, 2013
From: Ed Holyoke <bicyclop(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for RV-6
First they increased the height of the stab and made a larger counterbalanced rudder, then they came out with the 7 with an even taller stab (I think) and quickly went to the riveted trailing edge rudder for better spin recovery. What I've experienced with my 6A and small rudder is a little hunting in turbulence and not enough authority for serious slips. Less wetted area makes for a faster airplane, if that's what you want. Marty is probably right about not using full power on the takeoff roll, but it'll accelerate and break ground with very little power and then, with more airspeed and control authority, you can bring in the rest of the power. Even an O-320 fixed pitch bird climbs just fine, not 3000fpm mind you but just fine. Pax, Ed On 3/16/2013 7:34 PM, R.C. Flyer wrote: > Whats this about a larger tail for the -6? Im currently working on > my Fuse for the -6 and its a Tail dragger. I have the original Tail > Section that I built several years ago. How critical is this new tail > mod for the tail wheel version? Is this info on the web sight or can > it be found here on the forum? > R.C. > *From:* Marty Helller > *Sent:* March 16, 2013 6:43 PM > *To:* rv-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* RE: RV-List: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder > for RV-6 > You might want to advise your buddy that Vans made a larger tail for > a reason: especially if its a tail dragger or he puts in an engine > larger than the 160 hp. > > Even with the Rv-7 larger tail, I can't add full power until the tail > is off the ground... > > Marty > RV-7 75 hours > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 00:08:25 +0000 > From: HCRV6(at)comcast.net > To: RV-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV-List: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for RV-6 > > Has anyone out there got or know of and old style Vertical stab and > rudder for an RV-6, kit or any stage of completion, that they want to > part with. I think a -4 would also work. A friend of mine is > building a -6and does not want to use the new larger RV-8 style > vertical tail. > > Either reply here or call Bob Gorman directly at 408-828-6727 > > HarryCrosby > RV-6 N16CX, 1060 hours > > * > > t" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List > lank">http://forums.matronics.com > rget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > * > * > > > * > ~,gM4Gqz.'8ER&j)EK j',.+- > 5h,x zfb+bz.r.+-R*m > !y:0ZwEhy!!i0fr(Z(Tm > 'ojj+ERM $NEC&z > j(lVj^Yfr(mfr(*'gJ+^8L+i1m)j|-&j',rr&*'i0fr((nb{nrfl== ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: =?utf-8?Q?RE:_RV-List:_Looking_for_old_style_vertical_stab_and_rudder_for?=
=?utf-8?Q?_RV-6?
Date: Mar 17, 2013
From: "R.C. Flyer" <smirdrv(at)hotmail.com>
SSBoYXZlIGFuIE8tMzIwLTE2MCBpbiBteSBUYWlsd2luZCBhbmQgd2FzIGNvbnNpZGVyaW5nIGFu IE8tMzYwLTE4MCBmb3IgdGhlIC02LiBJ4oCZbSBvbmx5IDEyMCMgYWZ0ZXIgYSBoZWF2eSBtZWFs LCBhbmQgc29ha2luZyB3ZXQsIHNvIHBhc3MgcGF5bG9hZCB3b3VsZG7igJl0IGJlIGFuIGlzc3Vl LiBJIGRvIG9jY2FzaW9uYWxseSBleGVjdXRlIGFnZ3Jlc3NpdmUgc2xpcHMgb24gYXBwcm9hY2gg d2hlbiBuZWNlc3NhcnkuLi4uIHdhcyB0aGlzIGFuIOKAnEFE4oCdIGZyb20gVmFu4oCZcz8gTWF5 YmUgIEkgc2hvdWxkIGNvbnNpZGVyIGFub3RoZXIgTy0zMjAtMTYwLi4uLi4uDQoNCiANCg0KUi5D Lg0KDQoNCkZyb206IEVkIEhvbHlva2UNClNlbnQ6IOKAjk1hcmNo4oCOIOKAjjE24oCOLCDigI4y MDEzIOKAjjjigI464oCONTPigI4g4oCOUE0NClRvOiBydi1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20NClN1 YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBSVi1MaXN0OiBMb29raW5nIGZvciBvbGQgc3R5bGUgdmVydGljYWwgc3RhYiBh bmQgcnVkZGVyIGZvciBSVi02DQoNCg0KRmlyc3QgdGhleSBpbmNyZWFzZWQgdGhlIGhlaWdodCBv ZiB0aGUgc3RhYiBhbmQgbWFkZSBhIGxhcmdlciBjb3VudGVyYmFsYW5jZWQgcnVkZGVyLCB0aGVu IHRoZXkgY2FtZSBvdXQgd2l0aCB0aGUgNyB3aXRoIGFuIGV2ZW4gdGFsbGVyIHN0YWIgKEkgdGhp bmspIGFuZCBxdWlja2x5IHdlbnQgdG8gdGhlIHJpdmV0ZWQgdHJhaWxpbmcgZWRnZSBydWRkZXIg Zm9yIGJldHRlciBzcGluIHJlY292ZXJ5LiANCg0KV2hhdCBJJ3ZlIGV4cGVyaWVuY2VkIHdpdGgg bXkgNkEgYW5kIHNtYWxsIHJ1ZGRlciBpcyBhIGxpdHRsZSBodW50aW5nIGluIHR1cmJ1bGVuY2Ug YW5kIG5vdCBlbm91Z2ggYXV0aG9yaXR5IGZvciBzZXJpb3VzIHNsaXBzLiBMZXNzIHdldHRlZCBh cmVhIG1ha2VzIGZvciBhIGZhc3RlciBhaXJwbGFuZSwgaWYgdGhhdCdzIHdoYXQgeW91IHdhbnQu IE1hcnR5IGlzIHByb2JhYmx5IHJpZ2h0IGFib3V0IG5vdCB1c2luZyBmdWxsIHBvd2VyIG9uIHRo ZSB0YWtlb2ZmIHJvbGwsIGJ1dCBpdCdsbCBhY2NlbGVyYXRlIGFuZCBicmVhayBncm91bmQgd2l0 aCB2ZXJ5IGxpdHRsZSBwb3dlciBhbmQgdGhlbiwgd2l0aCBtb3JlIGFpcnNwZWVkIGFuZCBjb250 cm9sIGF1dGhvcml0eSwgeW91IGNhbiBicmluZyBpbiB0aGUgcmVzdCBvZiB0aGUgcG93ZXIuIEV2 ZW4gYW4gTy0zMjAgZml4ZWQgcGl0Y2ggYmlyZCBjbGltYnMganVzdCBmaW5lLCBub3QgMzAwMGZw bSBtaW5kIHlvdSBidXQganVzdCBmaW5lLiANCg0KUGF4LA0KDQpFZA0KDQpPbiAzLzE2LzIwMTMg NzozNCBQTSwgUi5DLiBGbHllciB3cm90ZTogDQoNCg0KV2hhdOKAmXMgdGhpcyBhYm91dCBhIGxh cmdlciB0YWlsIGZvciB0aGUgLTY/IEnigJltIGN1cnJlbnRseSB3b3JraW5nIG9uIG15IEZ1c2Ug Zm9yIHRoZSAtNiBhbmQgaXTigJlzIGEgVGFpbCBkcmFnZ2VyLiBJIGhhdmUgdGhlIG9yaWdpbmFs IFRhaWwgU2VjdGlvbiB0aGF0IEkgYnVpbHQgc2V2ZXJhbCB5ZWFycyBhZ28uICBIb3cgY3JpdGlj YWwgaXMgdGhpcyBuZXcgdGFpbCBtb2QgZm9yIHRoZSB0YWlsIHdoZWVsIHZlcnNpb24/ICBJcyB0 aGlzIGluZm8gb24gdGhlIHdlYiBzaWdodCBvciBjYW4gaXQgYmUgZm91bmQgaGVyZSBvbiB0aGUg Zm9ydW0/DQoNClIuQy4NCg0KDQpGcm9tOiBNYXJ0eSBIZWxsbGVyDQpTZW50OiDigI5NYXJjaOKA jiDigI4xNuKAjiwg4oCOMjAxMyDigI424oCOOuKAjjQz4oCOIOKAjlBNDQpUbzogcnYtbGlzdEBt YXRyb25pY3MuY29tDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSRTogUlYtTGlzdDogTG9va2luZyBmb3Igb2xkIHN0eWxl IHZlcnRpY2FsIHN0YWIgYW5kIHJ1ZGRlciBmb3IgUlYtNg0KDQoNCg0KWW91IG1pZ2h0IHdhbnQg dG8gYWR2aXNlIHlvdXIgYnVkZHkgdGhhdCBWYW5zICBtYWRlIGEgbGFyZ2VyIHRhaWwgZm9yIGEg cmVhc29uOiBlc3BlY2lhbGx5IGlmIGl0cyBhIHRhaWwgZHJhZ2dlciBvciBoZSBwdXRzIGluIGFu IGVuZ2luZSBsYXJnZXIgdGhhbiB0aGUgMTYwIGhwLg0KDQpFdmVuIHdpdGggdGhlIFJ2LTcgbGFy Z2VyIHRhaWwsIEkgY2FuJ3QgYWRkIGZ1bGwgcG93ZXIgdW50aWwgdGhlIHRhaWwgaXMgb2ZmIHRo ZSBncm91bmQuLi4NCg0KTWFydHkNClJWLTcgNzUgaG91cnMNCg0KDQoNCkRhdGU6IFN1biwgMTcg TWFyIDIwMTMgMDA6MDg6MjUgKzAwMDANCkZyb206IEhDUlY2QGNvbWNhc3QubmV0DQpUbzogUlYt bGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSVi1MaXN0OiBMb29raW5nIGZvciBvbGQgc3R5 bGUgdmVydGljYWwgc3RhYiBhbmQgcnVkZGVyIGZvciBSVi02DQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KSGFzIGFueW9u ZSBvdXQgdGhlcmUgZ290IG9yIGtub3cgb2YgYW5kIG9sZCBzdHlsZSBWZXJ0aWNhbCBzdGFiIGFu ZCBydWRkZXIgZm9yIGFuIFJWLTYsIGtpdCBvciBhbnkgc3RhZ2Ugb2YgY29tcGxldGlvbiwgdGhh dCB0aGV5IHdhbnQgdG8gcGFydCB3aXRoLiAgSSB0aGluayBhIC00IHdvdWxkIGFsc28gd29yay4g IEEgZnJpZW5kIG9mIG1pbmUgaXMgYnVpbGRpbmcgYSAtNmFuZCBkb2VzIG5vdCB3YW50IHRvIHVz ZSB0aGUgbmV3IGxhcmdlciBSVi04IHN0eWxlIHZlcnRpY2FsIHRhaWwuDQoNCkVpdGhlciByZXBs eSBoZXJlIG9yIGNhbGwgQm9iIEdvcm1hbiBkaXJlY3RseSBhdCA0MDgtODI4LTY3MjcNCg0KDQpI YXJyeSBDcm9zYnkNClJWLTYgTjE2Q1gsIDEwNjAgaG91cnMNCg0KDQoNCg0KdCIgdGFyZ2V0PSJf YmxhbmsiPmh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9OYXZpZ2F0b3I/UlYtTGlzdA0KbGFuayI+ aHR0cDovL2ZvcnVtcy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tDQpyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiPmh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0 cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9jb250cmlidXRpb24NCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCu+/ve+/ve+/vX7vv73vv70s77+9 Z++/ve+/ve+/vU0077+9R++/vXHvv73vv73vv71677+977+977+977+9Lu+/vSfvv73vv73vv73v v73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv704RVLvv73vv70mailF77+977+9 77+9S++/vSDvv71q77+977+9JywuKy3mrbrvv73vv70177+94oGraO+/ve+/ve+/ve+/vSx4embv v73IuO+/ve+/ve+/vWLvv70rYnrvv70ucu+/vS4rLVJ/0rnvv73vv70qbe+/ve+/vSDvv70h77+9 77+9ee+/vdyEOjDvv71ad++/ve+/ve+/ve+/ve+/vceC77+977+9Re+/ve+/ve+/vWjvv73vv715 77+93Zrvv70h77+977+9Ie+/ve+/ve+/ve+/ve+/ve+/ve+/vWnvv73vv70w77+9Zu+/ve+/ve+/ ve+/vXLvv70o77+977+9Wu+/vSjvv73vv73vv71U77+977+977+9be+/ve+/ve+/ve+/vSDvv73v v73vv70n77+977+977+9b++/vWrvv71q77+9K0VS77+977+977+977+977+977+977+977+977+9 77+977+977+977+977+977+977+977+977+977+9Te+/vSAk77+9TkVDJnog77+9au+/vSjvv73X p++/ve+/vWzvv73vv73ailbvv73vv73vv73vv71q77+9Xlnvv73Fou+/ve+/ve+/ve+/ve+/ve+/ ve+/ve+/vd+i77+977+977+9Zu+/ve+/ve+/ve+/vXLvv70o77+9be+/ve+/vd+i77+977+977+9 Zu+/ve+/ve+/ve+/vXLvv70o77+977+977+977+977+977+977+977+977+977+977+977+977+9 77+977+977+977+977+977+977+9Kifvv73vv73vv73vv73YqO+/vWfvv71KK14477+9TO+/ve+/ ve+/vSvKi++/ve+/ve+/vd6u77+977+977+977+9ae+/ve+/vTHvv71t77+977+977+977+977+9 77+977+9KWrvv71877+977+977+977+9Jmrvv73vv70nLHLvv73vv71y77+977+9Ju+/vSon77+9 77+9ae+/ve+/vTDvv71m77+977+977+977+9cu+/vSjvv73vv70o77+977+977+9bu+/vWLvv71/ 77+977+977+977+977+977+977+977+977+977+977+977+977+977+977+977+977+936J7f++/ ve+/ve+/vW7vv71y77+9Zmw9PT0NCg0KXy09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0NCl8tPSAgICAgICAgICAtIFRoZSBSVi1MaXN0 IEVtYWlsIEZvcnVtIC0NCl8tPSBVc2UgdGhlIE1hdHJvbmljcyBMaXN0IEZlYXR1cmVzIE5hdmln YXRvciB0byBicm93c2UNCl8tPSB0aGUgbWFueSBMaXN0IHV0aWxpdGllcyBzdWNoIGFzIExpc3Qg VW4vU3Vic2NyaXB0aW9uLA0KXy09IEFyY2hpdmUgU2VhcmNoICYgRG93bmxvYWQsIDctRGF5IEJy b3dzZSwgQ2hhdCwgRkFRLA0KXy09IFBob3Rvc2hhcmUsIGFuZCBtdWNoIG11Y2ggbW9yZToNCl8t PQ0KXy09ICAgLS0+IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9OYXZpZ2F0b3I/UlYtTGlzdA0K Xy09DQpfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PQ0KXy09ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgLSBNQVRST05JQ1MgV0VCIEZPUlVNUyAtDQpf LT0gU2FtZSBncmVhdCBjb250ZW50IGFsc28gYXZhaWxhYmxlIHZpYSB0aGUgV2ViIEZvcnVtcyEN Cl8tPQ0KXy09ICAgLS0+IGh0dHA6Ly9mb3J1bXMubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbQ0KXy09DQpfLT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ0K Xy09ICAgICAgICAgICAgIC0gTGlzdCBDb250cmlidXRpb24gV2ViIFNpdGUgLQ0KXy09ICBUaGFu ayB5b3UgZm9yIHlvdXIgZ2VuZXJvdXMgc3VwcG9ydCENCl8tPSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgIC1NYXR0IERyYWxsZSwgTGlzdCBBZG1pbi4NCl8tPSAgIC0tPiBodHRwOi8vd3d3 Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vY29udHJpYnV0aW9uDQpfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ= ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 17, 2013
From: HCRV6(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for RV-6
FWIW, I have the old small tail on my RV-6 tail dragger with O-360 and fixe d pitch (Catto) and it slips just fine. Sure, you can't add full power unti l you get a little speed for full rudder authority on takeoff, my feeling i s so what, makes me think I'm flying a Mustang (in my dreams!). As for tail wag, I have flown an RV-7 tail dragger with the large tail and it wagged j ust as much as mine does in turbulence. Now, having said all that, if you are given to doing intentional spins, go with the large tail for faster spin recovery. I have never spun mine, and h ave no intention of ever doing so . BTW, R.C., if you are building a tail dragger and plan on a fixed pitch pro p, especially if it is a light composite prop, you are probably going to fi nd that you need to be concerned about aft CG issues. The heavier O-360 mig ht actually be a boon in that respect. Just passing on my own experience fo r whatever it's worth. Harry Crosby RV-6 N16CX, 1060 hours and counting ----- Original Message ----- From: "R.C. Flyer" <smirdrv(at)hotmail.com> Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 11:05:04 PM Subject: RE: RV-List: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for RV -6 I have an O-320-160 in my Tailwind and was considering an O-360-180 for the -6. I=99m only 120# after a heavy meal, and soaking wet, so pass pay load wouldn=99t be an issue. I do occasionally execute aggressive sli ps on approach when necessary.... was this an =9CAD=9D from Van =99s? Maybe I should consider another O-320-160...... R.C. From: Ed Holyoke Sent: =8EMarch=8E =8E16=8E, =8E2013 =8E 8=8E:=8E53=8E =8EPM Subject: Re: RV-List: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for RV -6 First they increased the height of the stab and made a larger counterbalanc ed rudder, then they came out with the 7 with an even taller stab (I think) and quickly went to the riveted trailing edge rudder for better spin recov ery. What I've experienced with my 6A and small rudder is a little hunting in tu rbulence and not enough authority for serious slips. Less wetted area makes for a faster airplane, if that's what you want. Marty is probably right ab out not using full power on the takeoff roll, but it'll accelerate and brea k ground with very little power and then, with more airspeed and control au thority, you can bring in the rest of the power. Even an O-320 fixed pitch bird climbs just fine, not 3000fpm mind you but just fine. Pax, Ed On 3/16/2013 7:34 PM, R.C. Flyer wrote: What=99s this about a larger tail for the -6? I=99m currently w orking on my Fuse for the -6 and it=99s a Tail dragger. I have the or iginal Tail Section that I built several years ago. How critical is this ne w tail mod for the tail wheel version? Is this info on the web sight or can it be found here on the forum? R.C. From: Marty Helller Sent: =8EMarch=8E =8E16=8E, =8E2013 =8E 6=8E:=8E43=8E =8EPM Subject: RE: RV-List: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for RV -6 You might want to advise your buddy that Vans made a larger tail for a reas on: especially if its a tail dragger or he puts in an engine larger than th e 160 hp. Even with the Rv-7 larger tail, I can't add full power until the tail is of f the ground... Marty RV-7 75 hours Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 00:08:25 +0000 From: HCRV6(at)comcast.net Subject: RV-List: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for RV-6 Has anyone out there got or know of and old style Vertical stab and rudder for an RV-6, kit or any stage of completion, that they want to part with. I think a -4 would also work. A friend of mine is building a -6and does not want to use the new larger RV-8 style vertical tail. Either reply here or call Bob Gorman directly at 408-828-6727 Harry Crosby RV-6 N16CX, 1060 hours t" target="_blank"> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List lank"> htt p://forums.matronics.com rget="_blank"> http://www.matronics.com/contribu tion =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD~=EF=BD=EF=BD,=EF=BDg=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BDM4=EF=BDG=EF=BDq=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDz=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD.=EF=BD'=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD8ER=EF=BD=EF=BD&j)E=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BDK=EF=BD =EF=BDj=EF=BD=EF=BD',.+-=E6=AD=BA=EF=BD =EF=BD5=EF=BD=81=ABh=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD,xzf=EF =BD=C8=B8=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDb=EF=BD+bz=EF=BD.r=EF=BD.+-R =7F=D2=B9=EF=BD=EF=BD*m=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD!=EF=BD=EF =BDy=EF=BD=DC=84:0=EF=BDZw=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF =BD=C7=82=EF=BD=EF=BDE=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDh=EF=BD=EF=BDy =EF=BD=DD=9A=EF=BD!=EF=BD=EF=BD!=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDi=EF=BD=EF=BD0=EF=BDf=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BDr=EF=BD(=EF=BD=EF=BDZ=EF=BD(=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BDT=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDm=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD'=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDo=EF=BD j=EF=BDj=EF=BD+ER=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDM=EF=BD $=EF=BDNEC&z =EF =BDj=EF=BD(=EF=BD=D7=A7=EF=BD=EF=BDl=EF=BD=EF=BD=DA=8A V=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDj=EF=BD^Y=EF=BD=C5=A2=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=DF=A2=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BDf=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDr=EF=BD(=EF =BDm=EF=BD=EF=BD=DF=A2=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDf=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BDr=EF=BD(=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD*'=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=D8=A8=EF=BDg=EF=BDJ+^8=EF=BDL=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD+=CA=8B=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=DE=AE=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BDi=EF=BD=EF=BD1=EF=BDm=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD)j=EF=BD|=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD&j=EF=BD=EF=BD',r=EF=BD=EF=BDr=EF=BD=EF=BD&=EF =BD*'=EF=BD=EF=BDi=EF=BD=EF=BD0=EF=BDf=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BDr=EF=BD(=EF=BD=EF=BD(=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD n=EF=BDb=EF=BD=7F=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=DF=A2{=7F=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDn=EF=BDr =EF=BDfl=== === =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD~=EF=BD=EF=BD,=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD%=EF=BD=EF=BDM4=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDx=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BDw=EF=BDr=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "JohnF" <n29cx(at)ridgeviewtel.us>
Subject: Re: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for RV-6
Date: Mar 17, 2013
I sold my RV6A a few years ago and built an RV-12 (ago creeping ip on me pretty fast) but about tail wag in tubrulence; when I put vortex generators on there was a very noticeable reduction in yawing in turbulence...a very noticeable reduction. FWIW ----- Original Message ----- From: HCRV6(at)comcast.net To: rv-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2013 1:53 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for RV-6 FWIW, I have the old small tail on my RV-6 tail dragger with O-360 and fixed pitch (Catto) and it slips just fine. Sure, you can't add full power until you get a little speed for full rudder authority on takeoff, my feeling is so what, makes me think I'm flying a Mustang (in my dreams!). As for tail wag, I have flown an RV-7 tail dragger with the large tail and it wagged just as much as mine does in turbulence. Now, having said all that, if you are given to doing intentional spins, go with the large tail for faster spin recovery. I have never spun mine, and have no intention of ever doing so. BTW, R.C., if you are building a tail dragger and plan on a fixed pitch prop, especially if it is a light composite prop, you are probably going to find that you need to be concerned about aft CG issues. The heavier O-360 might actually be a boon in that respect. Just passing on my own experience for whatever it's worth. Harry Crosby RV-6 N16CX, 1060 hours and counting ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- From: "R.C. Flyer" <smirdrv(at)hotmail.com> To: rv-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 11:05:04 PM Subject: RE: RV-List: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for RV-6 I have an O-320-160 in my Tailwind and was considering an O-360-180 for the -6. I=99m only 120# after a heavy meal, and soaking wet, so pass payload wouldn=99t be an issue. I do occasionally execute aggressive slips on approach when necessary.... was this an =9CAD=9D from Van=99s? Maybe I should consider another O-320-160...... R.C. From: Ed Holyoke Sent: =8EMarch=8E =8E16=8E, =8E2013 =8E8=8E:=8E53=8E =8EPM To: rv-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Re: RV-List: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for RV-6 First they increased the height of the stab and made a larger counterbalanced rudder, then they came out with the 7 with an even taller stab (I think) and quickly went to the riveted trailing edge rudder for better spin recovery. What I've experienced with my 6A and small rudder is a little hunting in turbulence and not enough authority for serious slips. Less wetted area makes for a faster airplane, if that's what you want. Marty is probably right about not using full power on the takeoff roll, but it'll accelerate and break ground with very little power and then, with more airspeed and control authority, you can bring in the rest of the power. Even an O-320 fixed pitch bird climbs just fine, not 3000fpm mind you but just fine. Pax, Ed On 3/16/2013 7:34 PM, R.C. Flyer wrote: What=99s this about a larger tail for the -6? I=99m currently working on my Fuse for the -6 and it=99s a Tail dragger. I have the original Tail Section that I built several years ago. How critical is this new tail mod for the tail wheel version? Is this info on the web sight or can it be found here on the forum? R.C. From: Marty Helller Sent: =8EMarch=8E =8E16=8E, =8E2013 =8E6=8E:=8E43=8E =8EPM To: rv-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RE: RV-List: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for RV-6 You might want to advise your buddy that Vans made a larger tail for a reason: especially if its a tail dragger or he puts in an engine larger than the 160 hp. Even with the Rv-7 larger tail, I can't add full power until the tail is off the ground... Marty RV-7 75 hours ------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 00:08:25 +0000 From: HCRV6(at)comcast.net To: RV-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RV-List: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for RV-6 Has anyone out there got or know of and old style Vertical stab and rudder for an RV-6, kit or any stage of completion, that they want to part with. I think a -4 would also work. A friend of mine is building a -6and does not want to use the new larger RV-8 style vertical tail. Either reply here or call Bob Gorman directly at 408-828-6727 Harry Crosby RV-6 N16CX, 1060 hours t" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List lank">http://forums.matronics.com rget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD~=EF=BD=EF=BD,=EF=BDg=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BDM4=EF=BDG=EF=BDq=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDz=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BD.=EF=BD'=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD8ER=EF=BD=EF=BD&j)E=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF =BDK=EF=BD =EF=BDj=EF=BD=EF=BD',.+-=E6=AD=BA=EF=BD=EF=BD5=EF=BD =81=ABh=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD,xzf=EF=BD=C8=B8=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BDb=EF=BD+bz=EF=BD.r=EF=BD.+-R=7F=D2=B9=EF=BD=EF =BD*m=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD!=EF=BD=EF=BDy=EF=BD=DC=84:0=EF=BDZw=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=C7=82=EF=BD=EF=BDE=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF =BDh=EF=BD=EF=BDy=EF=BD=DD=9A=EF=BD!=EF=BD=EF=BD!=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDi=EF=BD=EF =BD0=EF=BDf=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDr=EF=BD(=EF=BD =EF=BDZ=EF=BD(=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDT=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD m=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD'=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDo=EF=BDj=EF=BD j=EF=BD+ER=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDM=EF=BD $=EF=BDNEC&z =EF=BDj=EF=BD(=EF=BD=D7=A7=EF=BD=EF=BDl=EF=BD=EF=BD=DA =8AV=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDj=EF=BD^Y=EF=BD=C5=A2=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=DF=A2=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BDf=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDr=EF=BD(=EF =BDm=EF=BD=EF=BD=DF=A2=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDf=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BDr=EF=BD(=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD*'=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=D8=A8=EF=BDg=EF=BDJ+^8=EF=BDL=EF=BD =EF=BD=EF=BD+=CA=8B=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=DE=AE=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BDi=EF=BD=EF=BD1=EF=BDm=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD)j=EF=BD|=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD&j=EF=BD=EF=BD',r=EF=BD=EF=BDr=EF=BD=EF=BD& =EF=BD*'=EF=BD=EF=BDi=EF=BD=EF=BD0=EF=BDf=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BDr=EF=BD(=EF=BD=EF=BD(=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF =BDn=EF=BDb=EF=BD=7F=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=DF=A2{=7F=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDn=EF =BDr=EF=BDfl== t="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD~=EF=BD=EF=BD,=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD %=EF=BD=EF=BDM4=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BDx=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BDw=EF=BDr=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: =?utf-8?Q?RE:_RV-List:_Looking_for_old_style_vertical_stab_and_rudder_for?=
=?utf-8?Q?__RV-6?
Date: Mar 17, 2013
From: "R.C. Flyer" <smirdrv(at)hotmail.com>
R290Y2hhLCBIYXJyeS4gSSBoYWQgQ0cgY29uY2VybnMgaW4gbXkgVGFpbHdpbmQgYmVjYXVzZSB0 aGUgd2luZ3MgYXJlIHdldCAoanVzdCB1bmRlciA1MCBnYWwuKXdoaWNoIHBsYWNlcyB0aGUgYmFs YW5jZSBwb2ludCBhIGJpdCBmYXRoZXIgYWZ0LiBTbyBpdCBzb3VuZHMgbGlrZSBhbiBPLTM2MCB3 b3VsZG7igJl0IGJlIGEgcHJvYmxlbS4uLi4uIFRoYW5rcy4gSeKAmWxsIGNvbnRhY3QgVmFu4oCZ cyB0b21vcnJvdyBhbmQgc2VlIHdoYXQgdGhleSBoYXZlIHRvIHNheSBhYm91dCB0aGUgaXNzdWUu DQoNCiANCg0KUi5DLg0KDQoNClNlbnQgZnJvbSBXaW5kb3dzIE1haWwNCg0KDQpGcm9tOiBIQ1JW NkBjb21jYXN0Lm5ldA0KU2VudDog4oCOTWFyY2jigI4g4oCOMTfigI4sIOKAjjIwMTMg4oCOMTLi gI464oCONTjigI4g4oCOUE0NClRvOiBydi1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20NClN1YmplY3Q6IFJl OiBSVi1MaXN0OiBMb29raW5nIGZvciBvbGQgc3R5bGUgdmVydGljYWwgc3RhYiBhbmQgcnVkZGVy IGZvciBSVi02DQoNCg0KDQpGV0lXLCBJIGhhdmUgdGhlIG9sZCBzbWFsbCB0YWlsIG9uIG15IFJW LTYgdGFpbCBkcmFnZ2VyIHdpdGggTy0zNjAgYW5kIGZpeGVkIHBpdGNoIChDYXR0bykgYW5kIGl0 IHNsaXBzIGp1c3QgZmluZS4gIFN1cmUsIHlvdSBjYW4ndCBhZGQgZnVsbCBwb3dlciB1bnRpbCB5 b3UgZ2V0IGEgbGl0dGxlIHNwZWVkIGZvciBmdWxsIHJ1ZGRlciBhdXRob3JpdHkgb24gdGFrZW9m ZiwgbXkgZmVlbGluZyBpcyBzbyB3aGF0LCBtYWtlcyBtZSB0aGluayBJJ20gZmx5aW5nIGEgTXVz dGFuZyAoaW4gbXkgZHJlYW1zISkuICBBcyBmb3IgdGFpbCB3YWcsIEkgaGF2ZSBmbG93biBhbiBS Vi03IHRhaWwgZHJhZ2dlciB3aXRoIHRoZSBsYXJnZSB0YWlsIGFuZCBpdCB3YWdnZWQganVzdCBh cyBtdWNoIGFzIG1pbmUgZG9lcyBpbiB0dXJidWxlbmNlLg0KDQpOb3csIGhhdmluZyBzYWlkIGFs bCB0aGF0LCBpZiB5b3UgYXJlIGdpdmVuIHRvIGRvaW5nIGludGVudGlvbmFsIHNwaW5zLCBnbyB3 aXRoIHRoZSBsYXJnZSB0YWlsIGZvciBmYXN0ZXIgc3BpbiByZWNvdmVyeS4gIEkgaGF2ZSBuZXZl ciBzcHVuIG1pbmUsIGFuZCBoYXZlIG5vIGludGVudGlvbiBvZiBldmVyIGRvaW5nIHNvLg0KDQpC VFcsIFIuQy4sIGlmIHlvdSBhcmUgYnVpbGRpbmcgYSB0YWlsIGRyYWdnZXIgYW5kIHBsYW4gb24g YSBmaXhlZCBwaXRjaCBwcm9wLCBlc3BlY2lhbGx5IGlmIGl0IGlzIGEgbGlnaHQgY29tcG9zaXRl IHByb3AsIHlvdSBhcmUgcHJvYmFibHkgZ29pbmcgdG8gZmluZCB0aGF0IHlvdSBuZWVkIHRvIGJl IGNvbmNlcm5lZCBhYm91dCBhZnQgQ0cgaXNzdWVzLiAgVGhlIGhlYXZpZXIgTy0zNjAgbWlnaHQg YWN0dWFsbHkgYmUgYSBib29uIGluIHRoYXQgcmVzcGVjdC4gIEp1c3QgcGFzc2luZyBvbiBteSBv d24gZXhwZXJpZW5jZSBmb3Igd2hhdGV2ZXIgaXQncyB3b3J0aC4NCg0KDQpIYXJyeSBDcm9zYnkN Cg0KUlYtNiBOMTZDWCwgMTA2MCBob3VycyBhbmQgY291bnRpbmcNCg0KDQpGcm9tOiAiUi5DLiBG bHllciIgPHNtaXJkcnZAaG90bWFpbC5jb20+DQpUbzogcnYtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tDQpT ZW50OiBTYXR1cmRheSwgTWFyY2ggMTYsIDIwMTMgMTE6MDU6MDQgUE0NClN1YmplY3Q6IFJFOiBS Vi1MaXN0OiBMb29raW5nIGZvciBvbGQgc3R5bGUgdmVydGljYWwgc3RhYiBhbmQgcnVkZGVyIGZv ciBSVi02DQoNCg0KDQpJIGhhdmUgYW4gTy0zMjAtMTYwIGluIG15IFRhaWx3aW5kIGFuZCB3YXMg Y29uc2lkZXJpbmcgYW4gTy0zNjAtMTgwIGZvciB0aGUgLTYuIEnigJltIG9ubHkgMTIwIyBhZnRl ciBhIGhlYXZ5IG1lYWwsIGFuZCBzb2FraW5nIHdldCwgc28gcGFzcyBwYXlsb2FkIHdvdWxkbuKA mXQgYmUgYW4gaXNzdWUuIEkgZG8gb2NjYXNpb25hbGx5IGV4ZWN1dGUgYWdncmVzc2l2ZSBzbGlw cyBvbiBhcHByb2FjaCB3aGVuIG5lY2Vzc2FyeS4uLi4gd2FzIHRoaXMgYW4g4oCcQUTigJ0gZnJv bSBWYW7igJlzPyBNYXliZSAgSSBzaG91bGQgY29uc2lkZXIgYW5vdGhlciBPLTMyMC0xNjAuLi4u Li4NCg0KDQpSLkMuDQoNCg0KRnJvbTogRWQgSG9seW9rZQ0KU2VudDog4oCOTWFyY2jigI4g4oCO MTbigI4sIOKAjjIwMTMg4oCOOOKAjjrigI41M+KAjiDigI5QTQ0KVG86IHJ2LWxpc3RAbWF0cm9u aWNzLmNvbQ0KU3ViamVjdDogUmU6IFJWLUxpc3Q6IExvb2tpbmcgZm9yIG9sZCBzdHlsZSB2ZXJ0 aWNhbCBzdGFiIGFuZCBydWRkZXIgZm9yIFJWLTYNCg0KDQpGaXJzdCB0aGV5IGluY3JlYXNlZCB0 aGUgaGVpZ2h0IG9mIHRoZSBzdGFiIGFuZCBtYWRlIGEgbGFyZ2VyIGNvdW50ZXJiYWxhbmNlZCBy dWRkZXIsIHRoZW4gdGhleSBjYW1lIG91dCB3aXRoIHRoZSA3IHdpdGggYW4gZXZlbiB0YWxsZXIg c3RhYiAoSSB0aGluaykgYW5kIHF1aWNrbHkgd2VudCB0byB0aGUgcml2ZXRlZCB0cmFpbGluZyBl ZGdlIHJ1ZGRlciBmb3IgYmV0dGVyIHNwaW4gcmVjb3ZlcnkuIA0KDQpXaGF0IEkndmUgZXhwZXJp ZW5jZWQgd2l0aCBteSA2QSBhbmQgc21hbGwgcnVkZGVyIGlzIGEgbGl0dGxlIGh1bnRpbmcgaW4g dHVyYnVsZW5jZSBhbmQgbm90IGVub3VnaCBhdXRob3JpdHkgZm9yIHNlcmlvdXMgc2xpcHMuIExl c3Mgd2V0dGVkIGFyZWEgbWFrZXMgZm9yIGEgZmFzdGVyIGFpcnBsYW5lLCBpZiB0aGF0J3Mgd2hh dCB5b3Ugd2FudC4gTWFydHkgaXMgcHJvYmFibHkgcmlnaHQgYWJvdXQgbm90IHVzaW5nIGZ1bGwg cG93ZXIgb24gdGhlIHRha2VvZmYgcm9sbCwgYnV0IGl0J2xsIGFjY2VsZXJhdGUgYW5kIGJyZWFr IGdyb3VuZCB3aXRoIHZlcnkgbGl0dGxlIHBvd2VyIGFuZCB0aGVuLCB3aXRoIG1vcmUgYWlyc3Bl ZWQgYW5kIGNvbnRyb2wgYXV0aG9yaXR5LCB5b3UgY2FuIGJyaW5nIGluIHRoZSByZXN0IG9mIHRo ZSBwb3dlci4gRXZlbiBhbiBPLTMyMCBmaXhlZCBwaXRjaCBiaXJkIGNsaW1icyBqdXN0IGZpbmUs IG5vdCAzMDAwZnBtIG1pbmQgeW91IGJ1dCBqdXN0IGZpbmUuIA0KDQpQYXgsDQoNCkVkDQoNCk9u IDMvMTYvMjAxMyA3OjM0IFBNLCBSLkMuIEZseWVyIHdyb3RlOiANCg0KDQpXaGF04oCZcyB0aGlz IGFib3V0IGEgbGFyZ2VyIHRhaWwgZm9yIHRoZSAtNj8gSeKAmW0gY3VycmVudGx5IHdvcmtpbmcg b24gbXkgRnVzZSBmb3IgdGhlIC02IGFuZCBpdOKAmXMgYSBUYWlsIGRyYWdnZXIuIEkgaGF2ZSB0 aGUgb3JpZ2luYWwgVGFpbCBTZWN0aW9uIHRoYXQgSSBidWlsdCBzZXZlcmFsIHllYXJzIGFnby4g IEhvdyBjcml0aWNhbCBpcyB0aGlzIG5ldyB0YWlsIG1vZCBmb3IgdGhlIHRhaWwgd2hlZWwgdmVy c2lvbj8gIElzIHRoaXMgaW5mbyBvbiB0aGUgd2ViIHNpZ2h0IG9yIGNhbiBpdCBiZSBmb3VuZCBo ZXJlIG9uIHRoZSBmb3J1bT8NCg0KUi5DLg0KDQoNCkZyb206IE1hcnR5IEhlbGxsZXINClNlbnQ6 IOKAjk1hcmNo4oCOIOKAjjE24oCOLCDigI4yMDEzIOKAjjbigI464oCONDPigI4g4oCOUE0NClRv OiBydi1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20NClN1YmplY3Q6IFJFOiBSVi1MaXN0OiBMb29raW5nIGZv ciBvbGQgc3R5bGUgdmVydGljYWwgc3RhYiBhbmQgcnVkZGVyIGZvciBSVi02DQoNCg0KDQpZb3Ug bWlnaHQgd2FudCB0byBhZHZpc2UgeW91ciBidWRkeSB0aGF0IFZhbnMgIG1hZGUgYSBsYXJnZXIg dGFpbCBmb3IgYSByZWFzb246IGVzcGVjaWFsbHkgaWYgaXRzIGEgdGFpbCBkcmFnZ2VyIG9yIGhl IHB1dHMgaW4gYW4gZW5naW5lIGxhcmdlciB0aGFuIHRoZSAxNjAgaHAuDQoNCkV2ZW4gd2l0aCB0 aGUgUnYtNyBsYXJnZXIgdGFpbCwgSSBjYW4ndCBhZGQgZnVsbCBwb3dlciB1bnRpbCB0aGUgdGFp bCBpcyBvZmYgdGhlIGdyb3VuZC4uLg0KDQpNYXJ0eQ0KUlYtNyA3NSBob3Vycw0KDQoNCg0KRGF0 ZTogU3VuLCAxNyBNYXIgMjAxMyAwMDowODoyNSArMDAwMA0KRnJvbTogSENSVjZAY29tY2FzdC5u ZXQNClRvOiBSVi1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20NClN1YmplY3Q6IFJWLUxpc3Q6IExvb2tpbmcg Zm9yIG9sZCBzdHlsZSB2ZXJ0aWNhbCBzdGFiIGFuZCBydWRkZXIgZm9yIFJWLTYNCg0KDQoNCg0K DQpIYXMgYW55b25lIG91dCB0aGVyZSBnb3Qgb3Iga25vdyBvZiBhbmQgb2xkIHN0eWxlIFZlcnRp Y2FsIHN0YWIgYW5kIHJ1ZGRlciBmb3IgYW4gUlYtNiwga2l0IG9yIGFueSBzdGFnZSBvZiBjb21w bGV0aW9uLCB0aGF0IHRoZXkgd2FudCB0byBwYXJ0IHdpdGguICBJIHRoaW5rIGEgLTQgd291bGQg YWxzbyB3b3JrLiAgQSBmcmllbmQgb2YgbWluZSBpcyBidWlsZGluZyBhIC02YW5kIGRvZXMgbm90 IHdhbnQgdG8gdXNlIHRoZSBuZXcgbGFyZ2VyIFJWLTggc3R5bGUgdmVydGljYWwgdGFpbC4NCg0K RWl0aGVyIHJlcGx5IGhlcmUgb3IgY2FsbCBCb2IgR29ybWFuIGRpcmVjdGx5IGF0IDQwOC04Mjgt NjcyNw0KDQoNCkhhcnJ5IENyb3NieQ0KUlYtNiBOMTZDWCwgMTA2MCBob3Vycw0KDQoNCg0KDQp0 IiB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL05hdmlnYXRvcj9SVi1M aXN0DQpsYW5rIj5odHRwOi8vZm9ydW1zLm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20NCnJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+aHR0 cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL2NvbnRyaWJ1dGlvbg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0K77+977+977+9 fu+/ve+/vSzvv71n77+977+977+9TTTvv71H77+9ce+/ve+/ve+/vXrvv73vv73vv73vv70u77+9 J++/ve+/ve+/ve+/ve+/ve+/ve+/ve+/ve+/ve+/ve+/ve+/ve+/ve+/ve+/ve+/vThFUu+/ve+/ vSZqKUXvv73vv73vv71L77+9IO+/vWrvv73vv70nLC4rLeatuu+/ve+/vTXvv73igato77+977+9 77+977+9LHh6Zu+/vci477+977+977+9Yu+/vStieu+/vS5y77+9ListUn/Sue+/ve+/vSpt77+9 77+9IO+/vSHvv73vv71577+93IQ6MO+/vVp377+977+977+977+977+9x4Lvv73vv71F77+977+9 77+9aO+/ve+/vXnvv73dmu+/vSHvv73vv70h77+977+977+977+977+977+977+9ae+/ve+/vTDv v71m77+977+977+977+9cu+/vSjvv73vv71a77+9KO+/ve+/ve+/vVTvv73vv73vv71t77+977+9 77+977+9IO+/ve+/ve+/vSfvv73vv73vv71v77+9au+/vWrvv70rRVLvv73vv73vv73vv73vv73v v73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv71N77+9ICTvv71ORUMmeiDv v71q77+9KO+/vden77+977+9bO+/ve+/vdqKVu+/ve+/ve+/ve+/vWrvv71eWe+/vcWi77+977+9 77+977+977+977+977+977+936Lvv73vv73vv71m77+977+977+977+9cu+/vSjvv71t77+977+9 36Lvv73vv73vv71m77+977+977+977+9cu+/vSjvv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73v v73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv70qJ++/ve+/ve+/ve+/vdio77+9Z++/vUor Xjjvv71M77+977+977+9K8qL77+977+977+93q7vv73vv73vv73vv71p77+977+9Me+/vW3vv73v v73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv70pau+/vXzvv73vv73vv73vv70mau+/ve+/vScscu+/ve+/vXLvv73v v70m77+9Kifvv73vv71p77+977+9MO+/vWbvv73vv73vv73vv71y77+9KO+/ve+/vSjvv73vv73v v71u77+9Yu+/vX/vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73vv73v v73vv73font/77+977+977+9bu+/vXLvv71mbD09PQ0KDQp0PSJfYmxhbmsiPmh0dHA6Ly93d3cu bWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9OYXZpZ2F0b3I/UlYtTGlzdA0KdHA6Ly9mb3J1bXMubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNv bQ0KX2JsYW5rIj5odHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vY29udHJpYnV0aW9uDQoNCg0K77+9 77+977+9fu+/ve+/vSzvv73vv73vv70l77+977+9TTTvv73vv73vv71477+977+977+977+9d++/ vXLvv73vv73vv73vv70NCg0KXy09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0NCl8tPSAgICAgICAgICAtIFRoZSBSVi1MaXN0IEVtYWls IEZvcnVtIC0NCl8tPSBVc2UgdGhlIE1hdHJvbmljcyBMaXN0IEZlYXR1cmVzIE5hdmlnYXRvciB0 byBicm93c2UNCl8tPSB0aGUgbWFueSBMaXN0IHV0aWxpdGllcyBzdWNoIGFzIExpc3QgVW4vU3Vi c2NyaXB0aW9uLA0KXy09IEFyY2hpdmUgU2VhcmNoICYgRG93bmxvYWQsIDctRGF5IEJyb3dzZSwg Q2hhdCwgRkFRLA0KXy09IFBob3Rvc2hhcmUsIGFuZCBtdWNoIG11Y2ggbW9yZToNCl8tPQ0KXy09 ICAgLS0+IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9OYXZpZ2F0b3I/UlYtTGlzdA0KXy09DQpf LT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PQ0KXy09ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgLSBNQVRST05JQ1MgV0VCIEZPUlVNUyAtDQpfLT0gU2Ft ZSBncmVhdCBjb250ZW50IGFsc28gYXZhaWxhYmxlIHZpYSB0aGUgV2ViIEZvcnVtcyENCl8tPQ0K Xy09ICAgLS0+IGh0dHA6Ly9mb3J1bXMubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbQ0KXy09DQpfLT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ0KXy09ICAg ICAgICAgICAgIC0gTGlzdCBDb250cmlidXRpb24gV2ViIFNpdGUgLQ0KXy09ICBUaGFuayB5b3Ug Zm9yIHlvdXIgZ2VuZXJvdXMgc3VwcG9ydCENCl8tPSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgIC1NYXR0IERyYWxsZSwgTGlzdCBBZG1pbi4NCl8tPSAgIC0tPiBodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJv bmljcy5jb20vY29udHJpYnV0aW9uDQpfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ= ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Warrenbrecheisen <n146wb(at)cfu.net>
Subject: Re: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for RV-6
Date: Mar 18, 2013
I echo the cg issue. I have an O-320 in my -6. Even with a metal fixed pit ch prop and -7 battery installation the cg is further back than I would like (about 1/3rd from forward most). Forget the 100 lb luggage capacity. You w on't be able to use it unless you are alone. I spun mine unintentionally du ring the test phase and recovery was good, but every plane is different. Warren On Mar 17, 2013, at 6:56 PM, "R.C. Flyer" wrote: > Gotcha, Harry. I had CG concerns in my Tailwind because the wings are wet ( just under 50 gal.)which places the balance point a bit father aft. So it so unds like an O-360 wouldn=C3=A2=82=AC=84=A2t be a problem..... Thanks. I=C3=A2=82=AC=84=A2ll contact Van=C3=A2=82=AC=84=A2s tomorrow a nd see what they have to say about the issue. > > R.C. > > Sent from Windows Mail > > From: HCRV6(at)comcast.net > Sent: =C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BDMarch=C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BD =C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BD 17=C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BD, =C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BD2013 =C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BD12=C3 =A2=82=AC=C5=BD:=C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BD58=C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BD =C3=A2=82 =AC=C5=BDPM > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for R V-6 > > FWIW, I have the old small tail on my RV-6 tail dragger with O-360 and fix ed pitch (Catto) and it slips just fine. Sure, you can't add full power unt il you get a little speed for full rudder authority on takeoff, my feeling i s so what, makes me think I'm flying a Mustang (in my dreams!). As for tail wag, I have flown an RV-7 tail dragger with the large tail and it wagged ju st as much as mine does in turbulence. > > Now, having said all that, if you are given to doing intentional spins, go with the large tail for faster spin recovery. I have never spun mine, and h ave no intention of ever doing so. > > BTW, R.C., if you are building a tail dragger and plan on a fixed pitch pr op, especially if it is a light composite prop, you are probably going to fi nd that you need to be concerned about aft CG issues. The heavier O-360 mig ht actually be a boon in that respect. Just passing on my own experience fo r whatever it's worth. > > Harry Crosby > RV-6 N16CX, 1060 hours and counting > From: "R.C. Flyer" <smirdrv(at)hotmail.com> > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 11:05:04 PM > Subject: RE: RV-List: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for R V-6 > > I have an O-320-160 in my Tailwind and was considering an O-360-180 for th e -6. I=C3=A2=82=AC=84=A2m only 120# after a heavy meal, and soaking w et, so pass payload wouldn=C3=A2=82=AC=84=A2t be an issue. I do occasi onally execute aggressive slips on approach when necessary.... was this an =C3 =A2=82=AC=C5=93AD=C3=A2=82=AC=C2=9D from Van=C3=A2=82=AC=84=A2s? Maybe I should consider another O-320-160...... > > R.C. > > From: Ed Holyoke > Sent: =C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BDMarch=C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BD =C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BD 16=C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BD, =C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BD2013 =C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BD8=C3 =A2=82=AC=C5=BD:=C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BD53=C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BD =C3=A2=82 =AC=C5=BDPM > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV-List: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for R V-6 > > First they increased the height of the stab and made a larger counterbalan ced rudder, then they came out with the 7 with an even taller stab (I think) and quickly went to the riveted trailing edge rudder for better spin recove ry. > > What I've experienced with my 6A and small rudder is a little hunting in t urbulence and not enough authority for serious slips. Less wetted area makes for a faster airplane, if that's what you want. Marty is probably right abo ut not using full power on the takeoff roll, but it'll accelerate and break g round with very little power and then, with more airspeed and control author ity, you can bring in the rest of the power. Even an O-320 fixed pitch bird c limbs just fine, not 3000fpm mind you but just fine. > > Pax, > > Ed > > On 3/16/2013 7:34 PM, R.C. Flyer wrote: > What=C3=A2=82=AC=84=A2s this about a larger tail for the -6? I=C3=A2 =82=AC=84=A2m currently working on my Fuse for the -6 and it=C3=A2=82 =AC=84=A2s a Tail dragger. I have the original Tail Section that I built s everal years ago. How critical is this new tail mod for the tail wheel vers ion? Is this info on the web sight or can it be found here on the forum? > R.C. > > From: Marty Helller > Sent: =C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BDMarch=C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BD =C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BD 16=C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BD, =C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BD2013 =C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BD6=C3 =A2=82=AC=C5=BD:=C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BD43=C3=A2=82=AC=C5=BD =C3=A2=82 =AC=C5=BDPM > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RE: RV-List: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for R V-6 > > You might want to advise your buddy that Vans made a larger tail for a re ason: especially if its a tail dragger or he puts in an engine larger than t he 160 hp. > > Even with the Rv-7 larger tail, I can't add full power until the tail is o ff the ground... > > Marty > RV-7 75 hours > > Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 00:08:25 +0000 > From: HCRV6(at)comcast.net > To: RV-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV-List: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for RV-6 > > Has anyone out there got or know of and old style Vertical stab and rudder for an RV-6, kit or any stage of completion, that they want to part with. I think a -4 would also work. A friend of mine is building a -6and does not w ant to use the new larger RV-8 style vertical tail. > > Either reply here or call Bob Gorman directly at 408-828-6727 > > Harry Crosby > RV-6 N16CX, 1060 hours > > > > t" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List > lank">http://forums.matronics.com > rget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > > > > =C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD~=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BD,=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDg=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF =C2=C2=BDM4=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDG=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDq=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF =C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDz=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD.=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD'=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD =C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF =C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD8ER=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD&j)E=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDK=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD =C3=AF=C2 =C2=BDj=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD',.+-=C3=C2=AD=C2=BA=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD5=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=A2=C2=81=C2=ABh=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD,xzf=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BD=C3=88=C2=B8=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDb=C3=AF =C2=C2=BD+bz=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD.r=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD.+-R=7F=C3=92=C2=B9=C3=AF =C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD*m=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD =C3 =AF=C2=C2=BD!=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDy=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=9C =9E:0=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDZw=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=87=9A=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD =C3=AF=C2=C2=BDE=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDh=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDy=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=9D=C5=A1=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD!=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD!=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BDi=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD0=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDf=C3=AF =C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDr=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD(=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDZ=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD(=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDT=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDm=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD =C3=AF=C2=C2=BD =C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD'=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDo=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDj=C3=AF =C2=C2=BDj=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD+ER=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF =C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD =C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF =C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDM=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD $=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDNEC&z =C3=AF=C2=C2=BDj=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD(=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=97=C2=A7=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDl=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=9A=C5-V=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDj=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD^Y=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=85 =C2=A2=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD =C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=9F =C2=A2=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDf=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDr=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD (=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDm=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=9F=C2=A2=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDf=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDr=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD(=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD*'=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF =C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=98=C2=A8=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDg=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BDJ+^8=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDL=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BD+=C3=8A=B9=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3 =9E=C2=AE=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BDi=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD1=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDm=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD =C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF =C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD)j=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD|=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD&j=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD',r=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDr=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD&=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD*'=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDi=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD0=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDf=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDr=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD(=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD =C3=AF=C2=C2=BD(=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDn=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BDb=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=7F=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=9F=C2=A2{=7F=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDn=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDr=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDfl=== > > > t="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List > tp://forums.matronics.com > _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > =C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD~=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3 =AF=C2=C2=BD,=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD%=C3=AF =C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDM4=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BDx=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2 =C2=BDw=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDr=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD=C3=AF=C2=C2 =BD=C3=AF=C2=C2=BD > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > > =C2=C2=B7=BA~=B0=C3=AD=C2=B2,=C3=9E=C3=99=C3=8A%=C2=A2=C2=BD 4=C3=93M4}=C2=A7=1Er=B9=C2=AB=B0=C3=C3=A7{=07(=C2=BA=C2=B8=C5 =BE=C2=AD8^ER=C3=A2=C2=B2=C3=91&j)E=C2=A2=C2=BB=C2R=C3=87=C2=AD=C3 =A3=1A=C2=B6=C2=BA'=B0=C3=8B=0B=C5-=C3=8BEy=C2=ABn=C2=AD=C3=AB j=C3=B8 j=C3=9A+=C2=B6-=C3=AB=C2=A3=0B=1E=C2=B6=17=C2j|=B9=C5-=C3 =8Bn=C2=B6)b=C2=B6'=C2=AC=C2=B2=C3=A7!j=C3=82=C3=A2=C2=B2=C3-'=C3=BD+ =BA=C2=B1=C3=8A=C3=A2=C2=C3=98=C2=A8=C5=93 =C3=9C-+=C3=9EI=C3=C2 =ABr=10=C3=A8=C3=82yhi=C3=9E=C3=83k k=C2=A3=0B=1E =16=C2=AD=14=04=0F- =B9h=C2=B2=16=C2=ABy=C2=A9=C3=9D=C5=A1=C3=A7!=C5=A1=C3=A7!=C5=A1=C5- =C3=9Ej=1A=C3=9E~=1Bm=C2=A7=C3=C3=B0=C3=83 =C5=A1=C2=B6=C2=BA'=B0 =C3=8B=1C=C2=A2o=C3=8Dj=C3=B8 j=C3=9A+ER=C3=A2=C2=B2=C3=98m=C2=B6=C5=B8=C3 =C3=83=0C&j=C3=9A=C3=A8=C5=BE',r=B0=C25=C2=AB=C3=A2=C2=81=C2=ABh=C2 =AD=15K=C5-=C3=8B=7Fh=C3=13D=C3=A3H %=9E=04S=98P=C3 =84=99jg =C2=AD=C3=C2=ADr=B0=C3=ADz{Z=93=C3=8A=1A=C2=BD =C2=A8=C2=A5i=C2=B9^=C2=BE&=C2=AD=C3=A5=C5=BElZ+=C2=BAk=1A- =C2=B7=C5=B8-=C3=9Bi=C3=C3=B7=C3=A8=C2=AE=C3=A9=C2=AC=84=A2=C2 =ABk=C2=A2x=C5=93=C2=B1=C3=8A&-=C3=9Bi=C3=C3=B7=C3=A8=C2=AE=C3=A9 =C2=AC=84=A2=C2=ABk=C2=A2x=C5=93=C2=B1=C3=8A&=C3=BD=C2=A2=C3=A2=C2=B2=C3=90 =C2=A8=C5=BE=C3=9A=C3=A2n=C3=ABb=C2=A2u=C5=BEm(=C2=ADy8Z=C5=BEL=C2=A8=C2=B9=C3 =BA+=C3=8A=B9=C2=AB=C2=81=C3=A9=C3=9E=C2=AE=B9=C2=AC=C2=B2=C3 i=C2=A2=C2=BBLj=C3=9BC=C2=AD=C2=A9ex=C2=B8=C2=AC=C2=B4=07f=C5-v=C2=A1=C2=AD =C3=A7=C3=A1=C2=B6=C3=9A=7F=C3=0C0=84=A2=C2=ABk=C2=A2x=C5=93=C2=B1=C3=8A &=C3=BD=C3=8A'=C2=B6=C2=B8=BA=C2=BA=C3=98=C2=A8=C5=BE=1Bm=C2=A7=C3=C3 =B0=C3=83 =C5=A1=C2=B6=C2=BA'=B0=C3=8B=1C=C2=A2o=C3=9C=C2=A2{k =B0=C2=BB=C2=AD=C5-=B0=C3k=C3=B6=C3~=B0=C3=AD=C3=BE=C5 =A1=C3=9E=C3=BD=C2=BA=1D=C3=8B=C3=B8m=C5=A1 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2013
Subject: RV-6 rudder
From: Max <maxfly55(at)gmail.com>
Harry, I have an early, completed vertical fin and rudder assembly. Where are you located? Thomas Phy 541-306-1500 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ralph Finch <ralphmariafinch(at)gmail.com>
Date: Mar 18, 2013
Subject: Re: internet sales taxes
I think I hear violins playing...or is it whining? *"If this happens, it will drive many small companies, like Flyboy Accessories, right out of business."* So you admit your business model depends on unfair subsidies from those who DO pay taxes. *"There is NO way that we'd be able to handle the additional work required to track sales taxes for 49 other states (including those who don't currently have a sales tax... we'd still have to track it!)."* Oh, dear, that IS a chore, tracking 50 different tax entities! You poor thing, you'll have to stay up all night keeping track! Of course, it's not 50 states you'd track, it's a few thousand tax boundaries (counties, cities, etc). Of course, no enterprising 3rd party company will ever be created to track these for you and the hundreds of thousands of other on-line businesses...naw, that's too obvious. *"Currently, the buyer (you) are responsible to remit sales taxes to your state on anything you buy from out of state. I know that compliance to this regulation is sometimes slim, but that is no reason to shift the liability to the innocent merchant!"* I DO pay my use taxes each year on my out-of-state purchases. Since I can track my purchases, I see no hardship to the "innocent" merchant. *"2. Don't be fooled, real people don't want new tax burdens of any kind on the Internet." * Screw you. Real people don't want corporate subsidies.* *Flyboy Accessories will never get my business...and building an RV-9A, I spend a lot. Ralph Finch ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2013
Subject: Re: internet sales taxes
From: John Trollinger <john(at)trollingers.com>
Ralph, Actually it is not a corporate subsidy, it is a subsidy for those buying the product, as the business is still paying its taxes, it is the consumer who is not paying their taxes. Right or wrong what the internet next is trying to do is force the business to collect the consumers portion of the tax for them and then pay it to the state that it is owed. It is hard to see why it should be the job of a company that operates out of state A being forced to follow the tax codes of state B just because consumers are not following the law the way you are Ralph. john On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Ralph Finch wrote: > I think I hear violins playing...or is it whining? > > > *"If this happens, it will drive many small companies, like Flyboy > Accessories, right out of business."* > > So you admit your business model depends on unfair subsidies from those > who DO pay taxes. > > > *"There is NO way that we'd be able to handle the additional work > required to track sales taxes for 49 other states (including those who > don't currently have a sales tax... we'd still have to track it!)."* > > Oh, dear, that IS a chore, tracking 50 different tax entities! You poor > thing, you'll have to stay up all night keeping track! Of course, it's not > 50 states you'd track, it's a few thousand tax boundaries (counties, > cities, etc). Of course, no enterprising 3rd party company will ever be > created to track these for you and the hundreds of thousands of other > on-line businesses...naw, that's too obvious. > > > *"Currently, the buyer (you) are responsible to remit sales taxes to your > state on anything you buy from out of state. I know that compliance to > this regulation is sometimes slim, but that is no reason to shift the > liability to the innocent merchant!"* > > I DO pay my use taxes each year on my out-of-state purchases. Since I can > track my purchases, I see no hardship to the "innocent" merchant. > > > *"2. Don't be fooled, real people don't want new tax burdens of any kind > on the Internet." > > * > Screw you. Real people don't want corporate subsidies.* > > *Flyboy Accessories will never get my business...and building an RV-9A, I > spend a lot. > > Ralph Finch > > * > > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2013
From: Linn <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: internet sales taxes
Sorry Ralph, but I think you're way out of line. What sales business experience do you have? I've had a few in my lifetime and the paperwork (which I absolutely hate) and crappy customers killed them all. Vince asked to not start a war ... but you had to respond .... and yes, I am too. I'm in FL, and the FL IRS says if you have physical presence in the state then you must collect sales tax. Pretty much the same in other states. It's just another way for bloated state Gov't to add another tax without doing anything to support those vendors in other states. Yep, you spend a lot through catalogs and internet sales and report your sales tax .... as you should but now you want to place that onus on small businesses. That's a shame. Linn .... last call On 3/18/2013 11:11 AM, Ralph Finch wrote: > I think I hear violins playing...or is it whining? > > /"If this happens, it will drive many small companies, like Flyboy > Accessories, right out of business."/ > > So you admit your business model depends on unfair subsidies from > those who DO pay taxes. > > /"There is NO way that we'd be able to handle the additional work > required to track sales taxes for 49 other states (including those who > don't currently have a sales tax... we'd still have to track it!)."/ > > Oh, dear, that IS a chore, tracking 50 different tax entities! You > poor thing, you'll have to stay up all night keeping track! Of course, > it's not 50 states you'd track, it's a few thousand tax boundaries > (counties, cities, etc). Of course, no enterprising 3rd party company > will ever be created to track these for you and the hundreds of > thousands of other on-line businesses...naw, that's too obvious. > > /"Currently, the buyer (you) are responsible to remit sales taxes to > your state on anything you buy from out of state. I know that > compliance to this regulation is sometimes slim, but that is no reason > to shift the liability to the innocent merchant!"/ > > I DO pay my use taxes each year on my out-of-state purchases. Since I > can track my purchases, I see no hardship to the "innocent" merchant. > > /*"2. Don't be fooled, real people don't want new tax burdens of any > kind on the Internet." > > */ > Screw you. Real people don't want corporate subsidies./* > > */Flyboy Accessories will never get my business...and building an > RV-9A, I spend a lot. > > Ralph Finch > * > > > * > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2013
From: HCRV6(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: RV-6 rudder
Max, Thanks, I have forwarded your phone number to Bob Gorman, my pal who is looking for the fin and rudder. Harry ----- Original Message ----- From: "Max" <maxfly55(at)gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 5:43:49 AM Subject: RV-List: RV-6 rudder Harry, I have an early, completed vertical fin and rudder assembly. Where are you located? ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Speaking of rudders...
From: Charlie E <ceengland7(at)gmail.com>
Date: Mar 18, 2013
Is anyone missing one? This one was found on the side of the road on Highway 49 N near Pocahontas M S. Charlie Sent from my iPhone

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 18, 2013
From: Linn <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Speaking of rudders...
Not mine! But look at the size of that trim tab!!! Linn On 3/18/2013 5:00 PM, Charlie E wrote: > Is anyone missing one? > This one was found on the side of the road on Highway 49 N near Pocahontas MS. > > Charlie ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Subject: Speaking of rudders...
Date: Mar 18, 2013
I have a friend that has 3 RV rudders mounted like trophy's in his hangar. He has backed out 2 RV's from his hangar w/o the bi-fold door being fully up. Yes he did it TWICE with one RV. When he calls Vans now the first thing they ask is if he wants to buy another set rudder parts. My friend has no opinion on large vs. small rudders but I know he probably wishes Vans made a short rudder. Robin ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Panama Red" <panamared505(at)brier.net>
Subject: Re: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for RV-6
Date: Mar 19, 2013
I have been flying my IO 360 RV-6 for 12 years and numerous RV 6s before that. I have never had a problem with not enough rudder on take off or otherwise. I do agressive slips, so aggressive that the Internnational Aerobatic Club calls them knife edge maneuvers. If you have the small rudder, I wouldn't worry about it. Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: R.C. Flyer To: rv-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 10:34 PM Subject: RE: RV-List: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for RV-6 What=99s this about a larger tail for the -6? I=99m currently working on my Fuse for the -6 and it=99s a Tail dragger. I have the original Tail Section that I built several years ago. How critical is this new tail mod for the tail wheel version? Is this info on the web sight or can it be found here on the forum? R.C. From: Marty Helller Sent: =8EMarch=8E =8E16=8E, =8E2013 =8E6=8E:=8E43=8E =8EPM To: rv-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RE: RV-List: Looking for old style vertical stab and rudder for RV-6 You might want to advise your buddy that Vans made a larger tail for a reason: especially if its a tail dragger or he puts in an engine larger than the 160 hp. Even with the Rv-7 larger tail, I can't add full power until the tail is off the ground... Marty RV-7 75 hours ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2013
Subject: internet sales taxes coming?
From: Vince Frazier <vincefrazier(at)gmail.com>
Ralph, I'm sorry if you feel that I have somehow wronged you by pointing out that internet sales taxes WILL make your online purchases more expensive. To me, this seems like a topic that homebuilders would want to know about before it happens due to the enormous amount of money we all spend online or out of state. As a small businessman I fully understand how the federal and Indiana state governments already expect me to work for free. Forgive me if I don't want to do that for 49 other states and countless municipalities. There is no need to threaten me with the loss of your business. Like 99% of other small, homebuilder related businesses, I have a full time day job. I won't starve if you buy elsewhere. Thanks to all who supported my email. We're all in this together. Thanks, Vince Frazier Flyboy Accessories 3963 Caborn Road North Mount Vernon, IN 47620 812-464-1839 1-888-8FLYBOY 1-888-835-9269 www.flyboyaccessories.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2013
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: internet sales taxes coming?
Sorry if my post was taken that way - that was not the intent. I still plan to purchase online - and from you if there is a product that fits my needs. I really like the variety of things that are available - just not the future hidden alligators. I actually have things out there too...and a day job. We may have been 'violently' agreeing! Again - no harm intended - hope this clears things. Ralph -----Original Message----- From: Vince Frazier Sent: Mar 19, 2013 9:54 AM Subject: RV-List: internet sales taxes coming? Ralph, I'm sorry if you feel that I have somehow wronged you by pointing out that internet sales taxes WILL make your online purchases more expensive. To me, this seems like a topic that homebuilders would want to know about before it happens due to the enormous amount of money we all spend online or out of state. As a small businessman I fully understand how the federal and Indiana state governments already expect me to work for free. Forgive me if I don't want to do that for 49 other states and countless municipalities. There is no need to threaten me with the loss of your business. Like 99% of other small, homebuilder related businesses, I have a full time day job. I won't starve if you buy elsewhere. Thanks to all who supported my email. We're all in this together. Thanks, Vince Frazier Flyboy Accessories 3963 Caborn Road North Mount Vernon, IN 47620 812-464-1839 1-888-8FLYBOY 1-888-835-9269 www.flyboyaccessories.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2013
From: James Bean <jimbean6(at)optimum.net>
Subject: Sales tax
hi all, The way I handled the tax was to register the plane as soon as I bought the kit. Then I reported the purchase and paid the tax on the kit. When the registration came through to the state (NY) they showed it already paid. So I avoided paying double tax on the rest of the parts (about 75% of the final cost.). regards Jim Bean RV-8 N99JA ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: =?utf-8?Q?FW:_RV-6_Vertical_Tail_and_Rudder?
Date: Mar 19, 2013
From: "R.C. Flyer" <smirdrv(at)hotmail.com>
SSBjb250YWN0ZWQgVmFucyB0byBhc2sgYWJvdXQgdGhpcyBpc3N1ZSBhbmQgaGVyZeKAmXMgd2hh dCB0aGUgcmVzcG9uc2Ugd2FzOg0KDQoNCkZyb206IEpvZSBCbGFuaw0KU2VudDog4oCOTWFyY2ji gI4g4oCOMTjigI4sIOKAjjIwMTMg4oCOMuKAjjrigI4wOeKAjiDigI5QTQ0KVG86IFIuQy4gRmx5 ZXINClN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBSVi02IFZlcnRpY2FsIFRhaWwgYW5kIFJ1ZGRlcg0KDQoNCiANClJD LCANCg0KDQogIA0KDQpZb3VyIChvbGRlcikgVi9TIGFuZCBSdWRkZXIgd2lsbCB3b3JrIGZpbmUu ICBUaGUgdXBncmFkZSB3YXMgYWN0dWFsbHkgZm9yIHRoZSBSVi03LzdBIGluIGl0J3MgZWFybGll ciB5ZWFycy4gIEEgc2xpZ2h0bHkgdGFsbGVyIFYvUyAmIFJ1ZGRlciB3YXMgb2ZmZXJlZCB0byBp bml0aWFsIFJWLTYgYnVpbGRlcnMgdGhhdCBvbmx5IGhhZCB0aGUgRW1wZW5uYWdlIGtpdCBhcyB0 aGV5IHdvdWxkIGJlIGJ1aWxkaW5nL2ZpbmlzaGluZyB0aGVpciBhaXJjcmFmdCBhcyBhbiBSVi03 LzdBLiAgIA0KDQoNCiAgDQoNClRoZSBSVi03IG5lZWRlZCBhIHNsaWdodGx5IHRhbGxlciB0YWls IHRvIGFpZCBpbiBzcGluIHJlY292ZXJ5IHNpbmNlIGl0IGhhZCBzbGlnaHRseSBsb25nZXIgd2lu Z3NwYW4gY29tcGFyZWQgdG8gYW4gUlYtNi4gDQoNCg0KICANCg0KQmVzdCBSZWdhcmRzLCANCg0K DQogICANCg0KSm9lIEJsYW5rIA0KDQpBaXJzaG93IENvb3JkaW5hdGlvbiAtIEJ1aWxkZXIgU3Vw cG9ydCANCg0Kam9lYkB2YW5zYWlyY3JhZnQuY29tIA0KDQp3d3cudmFuc2FpcmNyYWZ0LmNvbSAN Cg0KNTAzLTY3OC02NTQ1IA0KDQpncmFwaGljDQoNCg0KICAgDQoNCg0KICAgDQoNCioqKipFLU1B SUwgUFJJVklMRUdFRCBJTkZPUk1BVElPTioqKiogDQoNCihhcHBsaWNhYmxlIHRvIGFueSBlbWFp bCBzZW50IGZyb20gVmFuJ3MgQWlyY3JhZnQsIEluYy4gb3IgYW55IGVtcGxveWVlIG9mIFZhbidz IEFpcmNyYWZ0LCBJbmMuKSANCg0KVGhpcyBlbWFpbCBtZXNzYWdlIGlzIGZvciB0aGUgc29sZSB1 c2Ugb2YgdGhlIGludGVuZGVkIHJlY2lwaWVudChzKSBhbmQgbWF5IGNvbnRhaW4gY29uZmlkZW50 aWFsIA0KDQphbmQgcHJpdmlsZWdlZCBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbi4gQW55IHVuYXV0aG9yaXplZCByZXZp ZXcsIHVzZSwgZGlzY2xvc3VyZSBvciBkaXN0cmlidXRpb24gaXMgcHJvaGliaXRlZC4gIA0KDQpJ ZiB5b3UgYXJlIG5vdCB0aGUgaW50ZW5kZWQgcmVjaXBpZW50LCBwbGVhc2UgY29udGFjdCB0aGUg c2VuZGVyIGJ5IHJlcGx5IGVtYWlsIGFuZCBkZXN0cm95IGFsbCBjb3BpZXMgDQoNCm9mIHRoZSBv cmlnaW5hbCBtZXNzYWdlLiBJZiB5b3UgYXJlIHRoZSBpbnRlbmRlZCByZWNpcGllbnQsIHBsZWFz ZSBiZSBhZHZpc2VkIHRoYXQgdGhlIGNvbnRlbnQgb2YgdGhpcyANCg0KbWVzc2FnZSBpcyBzdWJq ZWN0IHRvIGFjY2VzcywgcmV2aWV3IGFuZCBkaXNjbG9zdXJlIGJ5IHRoZSBzZW5kZXIncyBFbWFp bCBTeXN0ZW0gQWRtaW5pc3RyYXRvci4gDQoNCg0KICANCg0KDQogIA0KDQotLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLSANCg0KT24gMTggTWFyIDIwMTMg YXQgMDo0MywgUi5DLiBGbHllciB3cm90ZTogDQoNCg0KICANCg0KRm9yd2FyZGVkIGJ5OiAgICAg ICAgICAgICJTdXBwb3J0IiA8U3VwcG9ydD4gDQoNCkZvcndhcmRlZCB0bzogICAgICAgICAgICAg am9lQiANCg0KRGF0ZSBmb3J3YXJkZWQ6ICAgICAgICAgIE1vbiwgMTggTWFyIDIwMTMgMDU6MjM6 MjQgLTA4MDAgDQoNClN1YmplY3Q6ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgUlYtNiBWZXJ0aWNhbCBU YWlsIGFuZCBSdWRkZXIgDQoNClRvOiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBWYW4ncyBB aXJjcmFmdCA8c3VwcG9ydEB2YW5zYWlyY3JhZnQuY29tPiANCg0KRGF0ZSBzZW50OiAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgIE1vbiwgMTggTWFyIDIwMTMgMDA6NDM6NTAgKzAwMDAgDQoNCkZyb206ICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICJSLkMuIEZseWVyIiA8c21pcmRydkBob3RtYWlsLmNvbT4gDQoN Cg0KICANCg0KSGVsbG8uICBJIHdhcyBtb25pdG9yaW5nIHRoZSBSViBZYWhvbyBGb3J1bSB3aGVu IHNvbWVvbmUgcmVxdWVzdGVkIGFuIOKAnG9sZCBzdHlsZSBWZXJ0aWNhbCBhbmQgUnVkZGVy4oCd LiBBcHBhcmVudGx5IHRoZXJlIGhhZCBiZWVuIGEgY2hhbmdlIGZyb20gdGhlIG9yaWdpbmFsIGVt cGVubmFnZSBiZWNhdXNlIG9mIHNsb3cgc3BlZWQvc3BpbiBhdXRob3JpdHkgaXNzdWVzLiBNeSBL aXQgU046MjUzMTUgIHB1cmNoYXNlZCBpbiDigJg5OCBvciBzby4gQ3VycmVudGx5IEnigJltIHdv cmtpbmcgb24gdGhlIGZ1c2VsYWdlIGFuZCBoYXZlbuKAmXQgY29tZSB0byB0aGUgcG9pbnQgb2Yg aW5zdGFsbGluZyB0aGUgdGFpbCBzZWN0aW9uLiBXYXMgdGhlcmUgYSBjaGFuZ2UgaW4gdGhlIFJ1 ZGRlciBhbmQgVmVydGljYWwgdGhhdCBJIHNob3VsZCBoYXZlIGJlZW4gYXdhcmUgb2YsIG9yIHNo b3VsZCBJIHBsYW4gb24gYnVpbGRpbmcgYW5vdGhlciBSdWRkZXIgYW5kIHZlcnRpY2FsPyBJ4oCZ bSBwbGFubmluZyBvbiBpbnN0YWxsaW5nIGFuIE8tMzYwLTE4MCBmb3IgdGhlIEZXRi4gIEFueSBp c3N1ZXMgSSBzaG91bGQgYmUgYXdhcmUgb2Y/ICBUaGFua3MgaW4gYWR2YW5jZS4gIA0KDQpSLkMu ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ralph Finch <ralphmariafinch(at)gmail.com>
Date: Mar 19, 2013
Subject: Re: internet sales taxes coming?
"I'm sorry if you feel that I have somehow wronged you by pointing out that internet sales taxes WILL make your online purchases more expensive." You don't get it. You assumed that everybody on the RV List is a far-right, anti-government, pro-tax-cheat like yourself. Collecting sales tax online won't make my purchases more expensive, because I pay them once a year anyway. Instead, your fellow cheaters will have to pay what's due. That doesn't bother me, in fact I welcome it, but I can see how you guys wouldn't like it. As a state water engineer who helps support California's trillion dollar economy, I fully understand how you expect government employees to work for free. I won't ask your forgiveness for telling you you're nuts. Personally, I object to $2 trillion wars based on lies, and an enormously bloated Pentagon budget, and the red states sucking dollars from the blue states, but that's just me. I don't post here expressing those views. The point is, eliminating tax cheaters is to everyone's benefit, and it will be no burden to online businesses because the free market will ensure (if it hasn't already) that sales tax rates will be instantly available to calculate final costs, given one's address. On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Vince Frazier wrote: > Ralph, > > I'm sorry if you feel that I have somehow wronged you by pointing out that > internet sales taxes WILL make your online purchases more expensive. To > me, this seems like a topic that homebuilders would want to know about > before it happens due to the enormous amount of money we all spend online > or out of state. > > As a small businessman I fully understand how the federal and Indiana > state governments already expect me to work for free. Forgive me if I > don't want to do that for 49 other states and countless municipalities. > > There is no need to threaten me with the loss of your business. Like 99% > of other small, homebuilder related businesses, I have a full time day > job. I won't starve if you buy elsewhere. > > Thanks to all who supported my email. We're all in this together. > > Thanks, > > Vince Frazier > Flyboy Accessories > 3963 Caborn Road North > Mount Vernon, IN 47620 > 812-464-1839 > 1-888-8FLYBOY > 1-888-835-9269 > www.flyboyaccessories.com > > * > > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RV6 Flyer <rv6_flyer(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: internet sales taxes coming?
Date: Mar 19, 2013
>From what I am reading it says: "... and the politics of the moment suggest the bill is barely keeping its head above water." Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/03/supporters-of-internet-sal es-tax-battle-headwinds-89040.html#ixzz2O1X1miKH I agree that we do not want to see an internet tax but we may be over react ing at this time. I am putting my efforts in to protecting my U.S. 2nd Amendment Rights at th is time. I want less Gov't not more. Gary A. Sobek "My Sanity" RV-6 N157GS O-320 Hartzell=2C 2=2C694+ Flying Hours So. CA=2C USA =0A ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 20, 2013
From: Linn <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: internet sales taxes coming?
On 3/20/2013 12:19 AM, Dave Saylor wrote: snip > Now...I just found some corrosion near the battery in my tail cone and > I'm wishing I'd primed at least that area. Anybody? What caused the corrosion??? Battery acid??? Primer will only slow down battery acid. I'm going to fab a FG box to contain any battery acid, even though I'm going to use a sealed gel-cell battery. Cases crack and the battery isn't in a spot that's easy to check. Linn > > Dave Saylor > 831-750-0284 CL ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 19, 2013
From: Ed Holyoke <bicyclop(at)pacbell.net>
Subject: Battery caused corrosion
Are you still using those obsolete flooded batteries? I haven't seen any corrosion problems related to RG batteries. They have to overcharge badly before they will vent. Ed On 3/19/2013 9:19 PM, Dave Saylor wrote: > > Now...I just found some corrosion near the battery in my tail cone and > I'm wishing I'd primed at least that area. Anybody? > > Dave Saylor > 831-750-0284 CL > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 20, 2013
Subject: internet taxes
From: Vince Frazier <vincefrazier(at)gmail.com>
I apologize to all who may have been offended by my post on taxes. However, let me make something clear, I am not a tax cheat, or a freeloader, and for anyone to say so only reflects on them. I fully understand the brick and mortar -vs- online retail issues, however, please don't forget that online retailers must charge for outbound shipping. So, assuming that everyone is honest when they pay their sales tax (as required by law in most states), online should be MORE expensive. This was not the point of my post though. The point of my post was this: Shifting the tax collection responsibility for hundreds of taxing bodies to online retailers WILL make stuff more expensive and WILL drive some of us to simply close the doors. You'll have fewer choices in where to purchase unusual items, like airplane parts. I have tried to post my opinions as related to AVIATION purchases. There was no "right-wing conspiracy" intended. How politics got into this discussion befuddles me. I cannot speak to other states, but if you pay your sales tax on aircraft kits, engines, etc ahead of time in INDIANA,( i.e. before the state of Indiana recognizes your new airworthiness certificate from the FAA) there is a very good chance that you'll pay for it twice. YMMV. I hope some of you have found something useful in my posts. If you did not, kindly leave the flames to some other forum. Comment all you want, but flaming personal attacks are uncalled for. Thanks, Vince Frazier Flyboy Accessories 3963 Caborn Road North Mount Vernon, IN 47620 812-464-1839 1-888-8FLYBOY 1-888-835-9269 www.flyboyaccessories.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: internet sales taxes coming?
From: Hal Benjamin <halbenjamin101(at)gmail.com>
Date: Mar 20, 2013
The corrosion is probably caused by taxes. Hal Benjamin RV-4 Long Island, NY First flight in about a month Sent from my iPad On Mar 20, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Linn wrote: > > On 3/20/2013 12:19 AM, Dave Saylor wrote: > snip >> Now...I just found some corrosion near the battery in my tail cone and >> I'm wishing I'd primed at least that area. Anybody? > What caused the corrosion??? Battery acid??? Primer will only slow down battery acid. I'm going to fab a FG box to contain any battery acid, even though I'm going to use a sealed gel-cell battery. Cases crack and the battery isn't in a spot that's easy to check. > Linn > >> >> Dave Saylor >> 831-750-0284 CL > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: FW: Bill's polar flight - not RV related
From: Jack <n81jg(at)aol.com>
Date: Mar 20, 2013
What an adventure! Who is Bill? Do you have some tech info on plane, engine, etc? John Greaves RV7A & Varieze Redding, CA Sent from my iPhone On Mar 14, 2013, at 4:25 PM, "Carl Froehlich" w rote: > A neighbor at Dogwood (VA42) took off this morning to circumnavigate the g lobe, via the poles. Bill broke the distance record a couple of weeks ago, f lying non-stop from Guam to Jacksonville Florida. His modified Lancair 4 ho lds 360 gallons of fuel, and the inherently efficient design allows him to c ruise at 180 knots averaging less than 9gph fuel burn. > > Use the below link to follow his flight. He is up linking a data point ev ery four minutes. His first refuel is southern Brazil, then the southern ti p of Argentina, from there over the South Pole to New Zealand, then Hawaii, Fairbanks, then over the North Pole back to Bangor Maine. > > Carl > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > From: sh <kitplanesue(at)gmail.com> > > Subject: Bill's polar flight > > Good morning, > > In case you're interested in following Bill's attempt to fly around both p oles, > here's the web link: > > https://go.spidertracks.com/fleetpro/public/zqpilot > > There are 4 small icons at the top left, the airplane icon puts a panel at the left that shows what ZQ is doing. > Use the plus to zoom in or the minus to zoom out. You use the pile of pape rs icon to determine the view. Try hybrid view. > > If you click the X, it will take you to a screen where you select Tracks a nd then click on the top latest date. > Once he's flying this will get you Bill's track as it is reported by Spide rtracks. (it also shows him taxiing while on the ground) > You must click on the last little teardrop to get his latest position info in a box on the screen. > As he gets closer to some interesting landmarks you can zoom in. > > Let's all keep our fingers crossed for a safe journey, > > Sue > > > > > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich(at)verizon.net>
Subject: FW: Bill's polar flight - not RV related
Date: Mar 20, 2013
Here is the EAA article that covered his Guam to Jacksonville flight: http://www.eaa.org/news/2013/2013-03-05_long-distance-lancair.asp Bill is stuck at the southern tip of Chile waiting for a break in the weather. Current condition have icing over Drake Passage. It looks like Friday at the earliest for his over the South Pole trip to Christ Church. Carl From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jack Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:47 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: FW: Bill's polar flight - not RV related What an adventure! Who is Bill? Do you have some tech info on plane, engine, etc? John Greaves RV7A & Varieze Redding, CA Sent from my iPhone On Mar 14, 2013, at 4:25 PM, "Carl Froehlich" wrote: A neighbor at Dogwood (VA42) took off this morning to circumnavigate the globe, via the poles. Bill broke the distance record a couple of weeks ago, flying non-stop from Guam to Jacksonville Florida. His modified Lancair 4 holds 360 gallons of fuel, and the inherently efficient design allows him to cruise at 180 knots averaging less than 9gph fuel burn. Use the below link to follow his flight. He is up linking a data point every four minutes. His first refuel is southern Brazil, then the southern tip of Argentina, from there over the South Pole to New Zealand, then Hawaii, Fairbanks, then over the North Pole back to Bangor Maine. Carl Begin forwarded message: From: sh < <mailto:kitplanesue(at)gmail.com> kitplanesue(at)gmail.com> Subject: Bill's polar flight Good morning, In case you're interested in following Bill's attempt to fly around both poles, here's the web link: https://go.spidertracks.com/fleetpro/public/zqpilot There are 4 small icons at the top left, the airplane icon puts a panel at the left that shows what ZQ is doing. Use the plus to zoom in or the minus to zoom out. You use the pile of papers icon to determine the view. Try hybrid view. If you click the X, it will take you to a screen where you select Tracks and then click on the top latest date. Once he's flying this will get you Bill's track as it is reported by Spidertracks. (it also shows him taxiing while on the ground) You must click on the last little teardrop to get his latest position info in a box on the screen. As he gets closer to some interesting landmarks you can zoom in. Let's all keep our fingers crossed for a safe journey, Sue ================================== /www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List ================================== cs.com ================================== matronics.com/contribution ================================== ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: internet sales taxes coming?
From: Jerry Isler <jlisler(at)windstream.net>
Date: Mar 20, 2013
Everyone knows taxes can be corrosive. Left unchecked, they will errode away your ability to fly. Is Cuomo going to let you fly that homemade flying machine? You might be OK as long as you don't try to fly with a Big Gulp, a cigarette, or an assault rifle. Good luck on the upcoming first flight. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 20, 2013, at 10:57 AM, Hal Benjamin wrote: > > The corrosion is probably caused by taxes. > > Hal Benjamin > RV-4 > Long Island, NY > First flight in about a month > > Sent from my iPad > > On Mar 20, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Linn wrote: > >> >> On 3/20/2013 12:19 AM, Dave Saylor wrote: >> snip >>> Now...I just found some corrosion near the battery in my tail cone and >>> I'm wishing I'd primed at least that area. Anybody? >> What caused the corrosion??? Battery acid??? Primer will only slow down battery acid. I'm going to fab a FG box to contain any battery acid, even though I'm going to use a sealed gel-cell battery. Cases crack and the battery isn't in a spot that's easy to check. >> Linn >> >>> >>> Dave Saylor >>> 831-750-0284 CL >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: FW: Bill's polar flight - not RV related
From: Denis Walsh <denis.walsh(at)comcast.net>
Date: Mar 20, 2013
General Steve Lorenz USAF(ret), '73 USAFA ENDOWMENT CEO, our guest speaker. =46rom the iPhone of D. Walsh On Mar 20, 2013, at 12:47, Jack wrote: > What an adventure! Who is Bill? Do you have some tech info on plane, engin e, etc? > > John Greaves > RV7A & Varieze > Redding, CA > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Mar 14, 2013, at 4:25 PM, "Carl Froehlich" wrote: > >> A neighbor at Dogwood (VA42) took off this morning to circumnavigate the g lobe, via the poles. Bill broke the distance record a couple of weeks ago, f lying non-stop from Guam to Jacksonville Florida. His modified Lancair 4 ho lds 360 gallons of fuel, and the inherently efficient design allows him to c ruise at 180 knots averaging less than 9gph fuel burn. >> >> Use the below link to follow his flight. He is up linking a data point e very four minutes. His first refuel is southern Brazil, then the southern t ip of Argentina, from there over the South Pole to New Zealand, then Hawaii, Fairbanks, then over the North Pole back to Bangor Maine. >> >> Carl >> >> >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> From: sh <kitplanesue(at)gmail.com> >> >> Subject: Bill's polar flight >> >> Good morning, >> >> In case you're interested in following Bill's attempt to fly around both p oles, >> here's the web link: >> >> https://go.spidertracks.com/fleetpro/public/zqpilot >> >> There are 4 small icons at the top left, the airplane icon puts a panel a t the left that shows what ZQ is doing. >> Use the plus to zoom in or the minus to zoom out. You use the pile of pap ers icon to determine the view. Try hybrid view. >> >> If you click the X, it will take you to a screen where you select Tracks a nd then click on the top latest date. >> Once he's flying this will get you Bill's track as it is reported by Spid ertracks. (it also shows him taxiing while on the ground) >> You must click on the last little teardrop to get his latest position inf o in a box on the screen. >> As he gets closer to some interesting landmarks you can zoom in. >> >> Let's all keep our fingers crossed for a safe journey, >> >> Sue >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ========================= ========= >> /www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List >> ========================= ========= >> cs.com >> ========================= ========= >> matronics.com/contribution >> ========================= ========= >> > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Marty Helller <marty_away(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: FW: Bill's polar flight - not RV related
Date: Mar 20, 2013
Last I checked=2C he was still by Tierra Del Fuego.....This is the current news release from EAA http://www.eaa.org/news/2013/2013-03-15_harrelson-att empting-flight-over-poles.asp This link below was his flight the other week from Guam to Jacksonville (7 =2C000+ NM). (and airplane info) http://www.eaa.org/news/2013/2013-03-05_l ong-distance-lancair.asp I am lucky enough to know Bill and his wife Sue =3B both professional aviators and the nicest people. Marty HellerRV-7 Subject: Re: RV-List: FW: Bill's polar flight - not RV related From: denis.walsh(at)comcast.net Date: Wed=2C 20 Mar 2013 16:01:38 -0600 General Steve Lorenz USAF(ret)=2C '73 USAFA ENDOWMENT CEO=2C our guest spea ker. >From the iPhone of D. Walsh On Mar 20=2C 2013=2C at 12:47=2C Jack wrote: What an adventure! Who is Bill? Do you have some tech info on plane=2C engi ne=2C etc? John GreavesRV7A & Varieze Redding=2C CA Sent from my iPhone On Mar 14=2C 2013=2C at 4:25 PM=2C "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich@verizon .net> wrote: A neighbor at Dogwood (VA42) took off this morning to circumnavigate the gl obe=2C via the poles. Bill broke the distance record a couple of weeks ago =2C flying non-stop from Guam to Jacksonville Florida. His modified Lancai r 4 holds 360 gallons of fuel=2C and the inherently efficient design allows him to cruise at 180 knots averaging less than 9gph fuel burn.Use the belo w link to follow his flight. He is up linking a data point every four minu tes. His first refuel is southern Brazil=2C then the southern tip of Argen tina=2C from there over the South Pole to New Zealand=2C then Hawaii=2C Fai rbanks=2C then over the North Pole back to Bangor Maine.Carl Begin forwarded message: From: sh <kitplanesue(at)gmail.com> Subject: Bill's polar flight Good morning=2C In case you're interested in following Bill's attempt to fly around both po les=2C here's the web link: https://go.spidertracks.com/fleetpro/public/zqpilot There are 4 small icons at the top left=2C the airplane icon puts a panel a t the left that shows what ZQ is doing. Use the plus to zoom in or the minus to zoom out. You use the pile of paper s icon to determine the view. Try hybrid view. If you click the X=2C it will take you to a screen where you select Tracks and then click on the top latest date. Once he's flying this will get you Bill's track as it is reported by Spider tracks. (it also shows him taxiing while on the ground) You must click on the last little teardrop to get his latest position info in a box on the screen. As he gets closer to some interesting landmarks you can zoom in. Let's all keep our fingers crossed for a safe journey=2C Sue ========= /www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List ========= cs.com ========= matronics.com/contribution ========= ========= /www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List ========= cs.com ========= matronics.com/contribution ========= ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 20, 2013
From: <be35(at)cox.net>
Subject: FW: Bill's polar flight - not RV related
Held for weather issues. He mentioned a possible window Saturday. If still no-go he will scrub and try again down the road. ---- Marty Helller wrote: > > Last I checked, he was still by Tierra Del Fuego.....This is the current news release from EAA http://www.eaa.org/news/2013/2013-03-15_harrelson-attempting-flight-over-poles.asp > This link below was his flight the other week from Guam to Jacksonville (7,000+ NM). (and airplane info) http://www.eaa.org/news/2013/2013-03-05_long-distance-lancair.asp I am lucky enough to know Bill and his wife Sue; both professional aviators and the nicest people. Marty HellerRV-7 > > > > > > Subject: Re: RV-List: FW: Bill's polar flight - not RV related > From: denis.walsh(at)comcast.net > Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:01:38 -0600 > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com > > General Steve Lorenz USAF(ret), '73 USAFA ENDOWMENT CEO, our guest speaker. > > >From the iPhone of D. Walsh > > On Mar 20, 2013, at 12:47, Jack wrote: > > What an adventure! Who is Bill? Do you have some tech info on plane, engine, etc? > John GreavesRV7A & Varieze Redding, CA > > Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 14, 2013, at 4:25 PM, "Carl Froehlich" wrote: > > A neighbor at Dogwood (VA42) took off this morning to circumnavigate the globe, via the poles. Bill broke the distance record a couple of weeks ago, flying non-stop from Guam to Jacksonville Florida. His modified Lancair 4 holds 360 gallons of fuel, and the inherently efficient design allows him to cruise at 180 knots averaging less than 9gph fuel burn.Use the below link to follow his flight. He is up linking a data point every four minutes. His first refuel is southern Brazil, then the southern tip of Argentina, from there over the South Pole to New Zealand, then Hawaii, Fairbanks, then over the North Pole back to Bangor Maine.Carl > > Begin forwarded message: > > From: sh <kitplanesue(at)gmail.com> > > Subject: Bill's polar flight > > Good morning, > > In case you're interested in following Bill's attempt to fly around both poles, > here's the web link: > > https://go.spidertracks.com/fleetpro/public/zqpilot > > There are 4 small icons at the top left, the airplane icon puts a panel at the left that shows what ZQ is doing. > Use the plus to zoom in or the minus to zoom out. You use the pile of papers icon to determine the view. Try hybrid view. > > If you click the X, it will take you to a screen where you select Tracks and then click on the top latest date. > Once he's flying this will get you Bill's track as it is reported by Spidertracks. (it also shows him taxiing while on the ground) > You must click on the last little teardrop to get his latest position info in a box on the screen. > As he gets closer to some interesting landmarks you can zoom in. > > Let's all keep our fingers crossed for a safe journey, > > Sue > > > > > > > > > ========= > /www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List > ========= > cs.com > ========= > matronics.com/contribution > ========= > > > > > ========= > /www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List > ========= > cs.com > ========= > matronics.com/contribution > ========= > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Ralph Finch <ralphmariafinch(at)gmail.com>
Date: Mar 20, 2013
Subject: Re: internet sales taxes coming?
You right-wing conspiracy kooks just can't let it go, can you? Take your kooky ideas to some other forum. On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Jerry Isler wrote: > > Everyone knows taxes can be corrosive. Left unchecked, they will errode > away your ability to fly. > > Is Cuomo going to let you fly that homemade flying machine? You might be > OK as long as you don't try to fly with a Big Gulp, a cigarette, or an > assault rifle. > Good luck on the upcoming first flight. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Mar 20, 2013, at 10:57 AM, Hal Benjamin > wrote: > > > > > The corrosion is probably caused by taxes. > > > > Hal Benjamin > > RV-4 > > Long Island, NY > > First flight in about a month > > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > On Mar 20, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Linn wrote: > > > >> > >> On 3/20/2013 12:19 AM, Dave Saylor wrote: > >> snip > >>> Now...I just found some corrosion near the battery in my tail cone and > >>> I'm wishing I'd primed at least that area. Anybody? > >> What caused the corrosion??? Battery acid??? Primer will only slow > down battery acid. I'm going to fab a FG box to contain any battery acid, > even though I'm going to use a sealed gel-cell battery. Cases crack and > the battery isn't in a spot that's easy to check. > >> Linn > >> > >>> > >>> Dave Saylor > >>> 831-750-0284 CL > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "William Greenley" <wgreenley(at)gmail.com>
Subject: internet sales taxes coming?
Date: Mar 20, 2013
Enough, whatever your thoughts on sales tax, I believe in the constitution, unlike many in government today. If that makes me a right wing nut, than I am proud to be so, but given the great country that has grown from that document, I have other ideas as to who the nuts are. The biggest taxes we are facing are how incredibly expensive it is getting to do anything due to the huge increases we have all faced and will continue to face in government regulation. BUT, this has diverged far from aviation, could we please get back to RV's. I sat in my RV-10 fuselage for the first time yesterday, working on the brake lines. Looking forward to the seats becoming a little more comfortable. Bill Greenley From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ralph Finch Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 7:04 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: internet sales taxes coming? You right-wing conspiracy kooks just can't let it go, can you? Take your kooky ideas to some other forum. On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Jerry Isler wrote: Everyone knows taxes can be corrosive. Left unchecked, they will errode away your ability to fly. Is Cuomo going to let you fly that homemade flying machine? You might be OK as long as you don't try to fly with a Big Gulp, a cigarette, or an assault rifle. Good luck on the upcoming first flight. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 20, 2013, at 10:57 AM, Hal Benjamin wrote: > > The corrosion is probably caused by taxes. > > Hal Benjamin > RV-4 > Long Island, NY > First flight in about a month > > Sent from my iPad > > On Mar 20, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Linn wrote: > >> >> On 3/20/2013 12:19 AM, Dave Saylor wrote: >> snip >>> Now...I just found some corrosion near the battery in my tail cone and >>> I'm wishing I'd primed at least that area. Anybody? >> What caused the corrosion??? Battery acid??? Primer will only slow down battery acid. I'm going to fab a FG box to contain any battery acid, even though I'm going to use a sealed gel-cell battery. Cases crack and the battery isn't in a spot that's easy to check. >> Linn >> >>> >>> Dave Saylor >>> 831-750-0284 CL >> >> >> >> >> > > ========== get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List ========== http://forums.matronics.com ========== le, List Admin. ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution ========== ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: internet sales taxes coming?
From: Jerry Isler <jlisler(at)windstream.net>
Date: Mar 20, 2013
Ralph, Do you not see the humor in this post? It was a joke man. It was meant for Hal. I know him from his Tallahassee, Fl a. days. Chill out. Jerry Isler Sent from my iPad On Mar 20, 2013, at 7:03 PM, Ralph Finch wrote: > You right-wing conspiracy kooks just can't let it go, can you? > Take your kooky ideas to some other forum. > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Jerry Isler wrot e: > > Everyone knows taxes can be corrosive. Left unchecked, they will errode aw ay your ability to fly. > > Is Cuomo going to let you fly that homemade flying machine? You might be O K as long as you don't try to fly with a Big Gulp, a cigarette, or an assaul t rifle. > Good luck on the upcoming first flight. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Mar 20, 2013, at 10:57 AM, Hal Benjamin wrot e: > > > > > The corrosion is probably caused by taxes. > > > > Hal Benjamin > > RV-4 > > Long Island, NY > > First flight in about a month > > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > On Mar 20, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Linn wrote: > > > >> > >> On 3/20/2013 12:19 AM, Dave Saylor wrote: > >> snip > >>> Now...I just found some corrosion near the battery in my tail cone and > >>> I'm wishing I'd primed at least that area. Anybody? > >> What caused the corrosion??? Battery acid??? Primer will only slow do wn battery acid. I'm going to fab a FG box to contain any battery acid, eve n though I'm going to use a sealed gel-cell battery. Cases crack and the ba ttery isn't in a spot that's easy to check. > >> Linn > >> > >>> > >>> Dave Saylor > >>> 831-750-0284 CL > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ========== > get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List > ========== > http://forums.matronics.com > ========== > le, List Admin. > ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > ========== > > > > > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 21, 2013
Subject: Stop the madness...
From: "Alan" <alan(at)reichertech.com>
Can we please kill the internet sales tax fight and get back to RV discussions? 8 out of 13 posts... - Alan On Thu, March 21, 2013 3:01 am, RV-List Digest Server wrote: ... > =============================================== > EMail Version of Today's List Digest Archive > =============================================== > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > RV-List Digest Archive > --- > Total Messages Posted Wed 03/20/13: 13 > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > Today's Message Index: > ---------------------- > > 1. 07:05 AM - Re: internet sales taxes coming? (Mike Kellems) > 2. 07:19 AM - Re: internet sales taxes coming? (Robin Marks) > 3. 07:19 AM - internet taxes (Vince Frazier) > 4. 08:58 AM - Re: internet sales taxes coming? (Hal Benjamin) > 5. 11:48 AM - Re: FW: Bill's polar flight - not RV related (Jack) > 6. 12:20 PM - Re: FW: Bill's polar flight - not RV related (Carl > Froehlich) > 7. 02:07 PM - Re: internet sales taxes coming? (Jerry Isler) > 8. 03:02 PM - Re: FW: Bill's polar flight - not RV related (Denis > Walsh) > 9. 03:21 PM - Re: FW: Bill's polar flight - not RV related (Marty > Helller) > 10. 03:37 PM - Re: FW: Bill's polar flight - not RV related () > 11. 04:04 PM - Re: internet sales taxes coming? (Ralph Finch) > 12. 04:22 PM - Re: internet sales taxes coming? (William Greenley) > 13. 05:02 PM - Re: internet sales taxes coming? (Jerry Isler) > ... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Warrenbrecheisen <n146wb(at)cfu.net>
Subject: Re: Stop the madness...
Date: Mar 21, 2013
It does no good to talk about it anyway. The jerks in Washington are gridlocked and can't get anything done,especially if it's something that might jeopardize getting reelected. They only care about keeping their ticket to the gravy train. Warren Sent from my iPad On Mar 21, 2013, at 6:18 AM, "Alan" wrote: > > > Can we please kill the internet sales tax fight and get back to RV > discussions? 8 out of 13 posts... > > - Alan > > > On Thu, March 21, 2013 3:01 am, RV-List Digest Server wrote: > ... >> =============================================== >> EMail Version of Today's List Digest Archive >> =============================================== >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> RV-List Digest Archive >> --- >> Total Messages Posted Wed 03/20/13: 13 >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> Today's Message Index: >> ---------------------- >> >> 1. 07:05 AM - Re: internet sales taxes coming? (Mike Kellems) >> 2. 07:19 AM - Re: internet sales taxes coming? (Robin Marks) >> 3. 07:19 AM - internet taxes (Vince Frazier) >> 4. 08:58 AM - Re: internet sales taxes coming? (Hal Benjamin) >> 5. 11:48 AM - Re: FW: Bill's polar flight - not RV related (Jack) >> 6. 12:20 PM - Re: FW: Bill's polar flight - not RV related (Carl >> Froehlich) >> 7. 02:07 PM - Re: internet sales taxes coming? (Jerry Isler) >> 8. 03:02 PM - Re: FW: Bill's polar flight - not RV related (Denis >> Walsh) >> 9. 03:21 PM - Re: FW: Bill's polar flight - not RV related (Marty >> Helller) >> 10. 03:37 PM - Re: FW: Bill's polar flight - not RV related () >> 11. 04:04 PM - Re: internet sales taxes coming? (Ralph Finch) >> 12. 04:22 PM - Re: internet sales taxes coming? (William Greenley) >> 13. 05:02 PM - Re: internet sales taxes coming? (Jerry Isler) >> > ... > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Subject: Airport Tower Closures
Date: Mar 23, 2013
I was reviewing the published list of 149 airport tower closure s and was really surprised that I have landed 26 of the 149 on the list. I was further surprised that one of my home airports Whiteman (WHP) is slated for tower closure. Now I totally understand that if some towers MUST be cl osed than choices need to be made and I further understand the NIMBY attitu de of sure close some towers but not MY towers. That being said let me desc ribe WHP to you and you can decide if this tower closure is a good idea. WHP is a one runway airport that sits under the Los Angeles Cla ss B veil for LAX. WHP is 4 miles from Burbank commercial airport and 4 mil es from Van Nuys airport both very busy hubs if aviation. Furthermore WHP s its near the Newhall pass which is a bit of a funnel for aircraft feeding i nto and out the San Fernando Valley. Additionally WHP hosts 5 of LA's news helicopters which park and hover taxi maybe 90 feet from the runway centerl ine adjacent to the 30 run up area. Whitman is also home for the CDF (Calif ornia Fire Department) heavy lift fire helicopters. Wikipedia says that Cal Fire is "one of the largest non-military air programs in the country that includes 11 UH01H Super Huey helicopters flying out of WHP. I know because they park and take off right behind my WHP hangar. The launch/landing area for CDF is "not visible" from the tower and requires extra tower control ca re for transitioning in and out of this area. WHP also hosts a modest amoun t of student training. Not a great deal of student training because costs h ave driven away many who may be interested in learning to fly. Additionall y there is a fair amount of police helicopter activity in the area because WHP is near some major highways 5, 118, 405, 101, 134, 210. Police tent to hover right at TPA for WHP. So the typical WHP weekend scenario is the student pilot doing T & G's while 3 737's are queued up to land Burbank as Golf streams are roc keting out of VNY with police helicopters hovering over the nearby freeways while the news choppers hover taxi back to their landing pad after their m ornings work and small aircraft transition into and out of BUR or VNY. All while CDF heavy lift choppers fly in and out of their compound directly und er the Left Downwind but blind to what is happening on and around the activ e runway. This is all occurring under LAX's Class B vial, under the VNY air space and in a little carve out of the Burbank airspace (SFC/4800'). All th is with mountain peaks covering 180 degrees and within 5 miles of WHP. I ha ve heard the tower chew out oblivious pilots dozens and dozens of times for clueless & illegal transitioning of the airspace. I literally fear what i t will be like w/o any control. It is not unusual for me to see 15+ traffic targets on my display. Last week I flew into WHP VFR but reporting 3 miles and haze. N ot that uncommon. I have flown into WHP well over 500 times and it was very difficult for me to pick up the runway 3 miles out even though I am quite familiar with the topography. I am fortunate to have beautiful large PFD/MF D with traffic but I am painfully aware that most aircraft in the area do n ot have nearly my experience and knowledge of the area or my selection of e quipment. This is just one story of 149. I hope it does not end up a horr or story. Robin ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 23, 2013
From: Scott <acepilot(at)bloomer.net>
Subject: Re: Airport Tower Closures
You could always move to the upper midwest where we have several towers slated for closure that probably won't even be missed. The strangest one on the list to me is Oshkosh. How will they do the big airshow? They just built that new huge tower a few years ago. Maybe they can turn it into an apartment complex for pilots. ;) On 3-23-2013 17:06, Robin Marks wrote: > > I was reviewing the published list of 149 airport tower > closures and was really surprised that I have landed 26 of the 149 on > the list. > -- ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Airport Tower Closures
From: Tracy <rwstracy(at)gmail.com>
Date: Mar 23, 2013
There may well be some closed towers that are really needed but I'm wonderin g why there is no coverage of the opposite side of the story. Here in Florida we had the most tower closures. I thought for sure the Her nando County airport would be among them as the recently built tower was a w aste of money in my opinion. No commercial operations and I've never had t o wait for traffic landing or taking off, so light is the use. But nope, H ernando's tower will not be affected. Tracy Crook RV-4 1900 hrs RV-8 130 hrs Sent from my iPad On Mar 23, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Scott wrote: > You could always move to the upper midwest where we have several towers sl ated for closure that probably won't even be missed. The strangest one on t he list to me is Oshkosh. How will they do the big airshow? They just buil t that new huge tower a few years ago. Maybe they can turn it into an apart ment complex for pilots. ;) > > > On 3-23-2013 17:06, Robin Marks wrote: >> >> I was reviewing the published list of 149 airport tower closu res and was really surprised that I have landed 26 of the 149 on the list. > > -- > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Airport Tower Closures
From: vanremog(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 23, 2013
There certainly is a case to be made for some of these towers to continue w ith moderate and/or sporadic traffic, if it can be shown that they are high ly useful for training purposes. I know my little airport at Livermore CA is a sleepy little place during the week that gets a little gnarly on the n ice weekends. How this situation might be best staffed is really the question. Furthermo re, there needs to be some objective way to evaluate these cases for keepin g them open other than you happen to have a Senator who is owed a favor, or knows where the bodies are buried. BTW, I don't think that KOSH is that crowded most of the time and I would t hink that they have controllers falling all over themselves to work during Airventure week. -GV -----Original Message----- From: Tracy <rwstracy(at)gmail.com> Sent: Sat, Mar 23, 2013 1:32 pm Subject: Re: RV-List: Airport Tower Closures There may well be some closed towers that are really needed but I'm wonderi ng why there is no coverage of the opposite side of the story. Here in Florida we had the most tower closures. I thought for sure the He rnando County airport would be among them as the recently built tower was a waste of money in my opinion. No commercial operations and I've never ha d to wait for traffic landing or taking off, so light is the use. But nop e, Hernando's tower will not be affected. Tracy Crook RV-4 1900 hrs RV-8 130 hrs Sent from my iPad On Mar 23, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Scott wrote: You could always move to the upper midwest where we have seve ral towers slated for closure that probably won't even be missed. The strangest one on the list to me is Oshkosh. How will they do the big airshow? They just built that new huge tower a few years ago. Maybe th ey can turn it into an apartment complex for pilots. ;) On 3-23-2013 17:06, Robin Marks wrote: I was reviewing the published list of 149 airport to wer closures and was really surprised that I have landed 26 of the 149 on the list. -- 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "mail.comcast.net" <bcollinsrv7a(at)comcast.net>
Date: Mar 23, 2013
Subject: Re: Airport Tower Closures
Is Hernando an FAA tower or a contract tower. Busier contract towers are being closed before sleepy FAA towers. Connected by DROID on Verizon Wireless -----Original message----- From: Tracy <rwstracy(at)gmail.com> Sent: Sat, Mar 23, 2013 20:31:29 GMT+00:00 Subject: Re: RV-List: Airport Tower Closures There may well be some closed towers that are really needed but I'm wondering why there is no coverage of the opposite side of the story. Here in Florida we had the most tower closures. I thought for sure the Hernando County airport would be among them as the recently built tower was a waste of money in my opinion. No commercial operations and I've never had to wait for traffic landing or taking off, so light is the use. But nope, Hernando's tower will not be affected. Tracy Crook RV-4 1900 hrs RV-8 130 hrs Sent from my iPad On Mar 23, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Scott wrote: > You could always move to the upper midwest where we have several towers slated for closure that probably won't even be missed. The strangest one on the list to me is Oshkosh. How will they do the big airshow? They just built that new huge tower a few years ago. Maybe they can turn it into an apartment complex for pilots. ;) > > > On 3-23-2013 17:06, Robin Marks wrote: >> >> I was reviewing the published list of 149 airport tower closures and was really surprised that I have landed 26 of the 149 on the list. > > -- > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 28, 2013
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: AOPA flight planner
Anyone having any success with AOPA's new flight planning software? What is your secret? This thing was changed with little or no warning and is not even close to being the replacement for what they had! Alternatively, what are you using successfully? Ralph Capen ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 28, 2013
From: Linn <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: AOPA flight planner
I too was disappointed .... Had to enter all my information (again!) just to get very little planning capability. Go ahead and say it .... the new software sucks. Linn On 3/28/2013 12:25 PM, Ralph E. Capen wrote: > > Anyone having any success with AOPA's new flight planning software? > What is your secret? > > This thing was changed with little or no warning and is not even close to being the replacement for what they had! > > Alternatively, what are you using successfully? > > Ralph Capen > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "G Lee" <gene.lee(at)gte.net>
Subject: AOPA flight planner
Date: Mar 28, 2013
WHAT?!?! Did I miss some notice that they would be stripping down what they had, and why? The one thing it used to do that I liked was seeing the profile view showing airspaces/moa/etc that the flight altitude would be passing through. That appears to be gone now. I HATE Apple products but I totally love Foreflight, so I guess I'll keep sucking it up. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Linn Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 11:44 AM Subject: Re: RV-List: AOPA flight planner I too was disappointed .... Had to enter all my information (again!) just to get very little planning capability. Go ahead and say it .... the new software sucks. Linn On 3/28/2013 12:25 PM, Ralph E. Capen wrote: > --> > > Anyone having any success with AOPA's new flight planning software? > What is your secret? > > This thing was changed with little or no warning and is not even close to being the replacement for what they had! > > Alternatively, what are you using successfully? > > Ralph Capen > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: AOPA flight planner
From: Bobby Hester <bobbyhester(at)twc.com>
Date: Mar 28, 2013
Has anyone told AOPA? Doesn't do much good to complain to each other. I'm not an AOPA member, but I if I remember correctly didn't there app come about from the Voyager FreeFlight app? You might want to check it out and see if it is like what The AOPA is use to be. Sent from my Verizon iPhone On Mar 28, 2013, at 10:44 AM, Linn wrote: > > I too was disappointed .... Had to enter all my information (again!) just to get very little planning capability. Go ahead and say it .... the new software sucks. > Linn > > On 3/28/2013 12:25 PM, Ralph E. Capen wrote: >> >> Anyone having any success with AOPA's new flight planning software? >> What is your secret? >> >> This thing was changed with little or no warning and is not even close to being the replacement for what they had! >> >> Alternatively, what are you using successfully? >> >> Ralph Capen >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 28, 2013
From: Linn <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: AOPA flight planner
On 3/28/2013 1:55 PM, Bobby Hester wrote: > > Has anyone told AOPA? I did. Y'all should BCC this thread to AOPA Linn > Doesn't do much good to complain to each other. > I'm not an AOPA member, but I if I remember correctly didn't there app come about from the Voyager FreeFlight app? You might want to check it out and see if it is like what The AOPA is use to be. > > Sent from my Verizon iPhone > > On Mar 28, 2013, at 10:44 AM, Linn wrote: > >> >> I too was disappointed .... Had to enter all my information (again!) just to get very little planning capability. Go ahead and say it .... the new software sucks. >> Linn >> >> On 3/28/2013 12:25 PM, Ralph E. Capen wrote: >>> >>> Anyone having any success with AOPA's new flight planning software? >>> What is your secret? >>> >>> This thing was changed with little or no warning and is not even close to being the replacement for what they had! >>> >>> Alternatively, what are you using successfully? >>> >>> Ralph Capen >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> No virus found in this message. >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> >> >> >> > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Collins" <bcollinsrv7a(at)comcast.net>
Subject: AOPA flight planner
Date: Mar 28, 2013
Yes, I've had several communications with them. After the fact, of course. They weren't particularly apologetic for making the change, though they apologized for having so many bugs once they did. I've moved on. Your AOPA dues this year will go to pay for the constant mailings to get me to renew. :*) -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bobby Hester Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 12:56 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: AOPA flight planner Has anyone told AOPA? Doesn't do much good to complain to each other. I'm not an AOPA member, but I if I remember correctly didn't there app come about from the Voyager FreeFlight app? You might want to check it out and see if it is like what The AOPA is use to be. Sent from my Verizon iPhone On Mar 28, 2013, at 10:44 AM, Linn wrote: > > I too was disappointed .... Had to enter all my information (again!) just to get very little planning capability. Go ahead and say it .... the new software sucks. > Linn > > On 3/28/2013 12:25 PM, Ralph E. Capen wrote: >> --> >> >> Anyone having any success with AOPA's new flight planning software? >> What is your secret? >> >> This thing was changed with little or no warning and is not even close to being the replacement for what they had! >> >> Alternatively, what are you using successfully? >> >> Ralph Capen >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 31, 2013
From: Mike De Lange <squishyoleo(at)yahoo.ca>
Subject: Hi!!!
http://www.sagona-rc.com/rjd/hci.wvqhs?sm Mike De Lange 3/31/2013 11:25:43 PM tbriuksouqamng wmgyure ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 01, 2013
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Canopy Mid Retention Block
Hey fellow RV-8 builders, On Dwg 44, right in the middle, it talks about a "1/2" x 1/2" UHMW "Canopy Mid Retention Block" for holding the canopy half open. I guess I'm just not getting "how" this is suppose to work. Does anyone have any pictures of their installation that shows the what, where, how of this thing? On Ruby 1.0 I had this little black knob on the right hand side of the canopy that had a pin that would stick down into a hole in the rail. It worked pretty well in theory, but in practice, it would jump out of the hole and drag along the canopy rail top and scratch the paint off. Needless to say, I wasn't diggin' that. Here's a little picture of it before I moved it to the right side: Emacs! Anyway, I'm wondering if this little 1/2" x 1/2" UHMW block is somehow more magical than this knob arrangement...? - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 120+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 01, 2013
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Canopy Lock Source...
Fellow Builders, On Ruby 1.0 I engineered a custom canopy lock that I really liked. I worked really well and in 172 hours of flying I never had a problem with it. (See attached pictures.) I also really liked having that lock sticking out right there because it made it really easy to open the canopy and pop the back end of the canopy up. For Ruby 2.0 I plan to do the same thing, but I would really like to fine a higher quality lock. The one I used I got from the hardware store and is really kind of a piece of garbage. It seems like a Chinese copy of something that was actually good. Does anyone know where I could get a similar lock, but of exceptionally high quality and maybe made out of stainless? Thanks! - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 120+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 02, 2013
Subject: Canopy automatic latch
From: Vince Frazier <vincefrazier(at)gmail.com>
Matt, We have an automatic canopy latch that is very easy to use. You may have seen it on other RV-8s. They are made by Mike Zeller. Check them out at www.flyboyaccessories.com Vince ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 03, 2013
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Re: Canopy Lock Source...
At 05:09 PM 4/2/2013 Tuesday, you wrote: >In a message dated 4/2/2013 11:37:58 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, dralle(at)matronics.com writes: >[] >[] > >Fellow Builders, > >On Ruby 1.0 I engineered a custom canopy lock that I really liked. I worked really well and in 172 hours of flying I never had a problem with it. (See attached pictures.) I also really liked having that lock sticking out right there because it made it really easy to open the canopy and pop the back end of the canopy up. > >For Ruby 2.0 I plan to do the same thing, but I would really like to fine a higher quality lock. The one I used I got from the hardware store and is really kind of a piece of garbage. It seems like a Chinese copy of something that was actually good. > >Does anyone know where I could get a similar lock, but of exceptionally high quality and maybe made out of stainless? > >Thanks! >Matt Dralle Thanks to all that have replied both on and off List. I found these babies today and, at least in the pictures, look pretty manly. I ordered one and it should be here tomorrow. Hopefully it will be better quality than the pot-metal ones from Home Depot. At $33.49/ea, they cost literally about 10-times as much as Home Depot units. So, that HAVE to be 10-times better, right? ;-/ http://www.rockler.com/product.cfm?page=664 After I ordered the ones above, I found an "Olympus" brand of something similar for even more money ($50/ea). These look even more manly, although they have a 1/125" dia barrel which is starting to get a little too big: http://buyaccess.com/olympus-lock-800sc-deadbolt-cabinet-drawer-lock?gdftrk=gdfV22700_a_7c1040_a_7c4922_a_7c800SC I'll post some pictures when I get the Rockler units in the mail. Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 120+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 05, 2013
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Re: RV8-List: Landing/Taxi Light Options
At 11:58 AM 4/5/2013 Friday, you wrote: >I would like some feedback on this subject as it is one of the loose ends in planning my electrical system. I have settled on AeroLED for the position lights/strobes, but am having difficulty sorting through all the landing/taxi light options. Plan A would be to use LED lights in the tips, but I am not sure what all will or will not fit there. Although I understand that leading edge lights are an easy installation, I would just prefer not to incur the additional work to do the leading edge cutouts. Another question: Given the landing attitude of the 8, are separate landing and taxi lights required? Seems to me that maybe a combination of the right output and targeting angle could work using single light sources in each tip. > >Stan Loer >RV8 QB I installed two Duckworks 50w HID lights, one in each wing tip; one angled for Taxi, one for Landing. Installation was straightforward. Brightness of the HID lights is amazing! On final approach, I light the whole runway up! Like landing during the day! I highly recommend the Duckworks product; one in each wing. I've got no question that I'm going to be able to make a safe landing with the amount and position of light I get from the installation. And that's really what its all about. Here is a detailed installation log on my experience: <http://www.mykitlog.com/users/display_log.php?user=MattsRV8&project=638&category=2982&log=81622&row=175>http://www.mykitlog.com/users/display_log.php?user=MattsRV8&project=638&category=2982&log=81622&row=175 There are 9 parts to the log, so be sure to click through all of the various pictures and log entries related. Best, - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 120+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 08, 2013
Subject: locking up the plane
From: thomas sargent <sarg314(at)gmail.com>
It's kind of late to ask this, but how do folks secure their plane when they park it away from their home airport? I built my 6A canopy latch exactly as shown in the plans - it's two flimsy 1/8" pieces of aluminum. I could have drilled a hole in the 2 pieces to accept a small padlock, but I never did. It seemed pointless. The lock could snipped and my radios swiped in a minute. Does any one have any ideas/philosophy on this issue? -- Tom Sargent RV-6A ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: locking up the plane
From: Dale Ensing <densing(at)carolina.rr.com>
Date: Apr 08, 2013
I have a 6A slider. My lock is in the slider side panel and goes into the ro ller track. Works well, at least as a deterrent. Sent from my iPhone On Apr 8, 2013, at 18:52, thomas sargent wrote: > It's kind of late to ask this, but how do folks secure their plane when th ey park it away from their home airport? > > I built my 6A canopy latch exactly as shown in the plans - it's two flimsy 1/8" pieces of aluminum. I could have drilled a hole in the 2 pieces to ac cept a small padlock, but I never did. It seemed pointless. The lock could snipped and my radios swiped in a minute. > > Does any one have any ideas/philosophy on this issue? > > -- > Tom Sargent > RV-6A > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "G Lee" <gene.lee(at)gte.net>
Subject: locking up the plane
Date: Apr 08, 2013
I have the =98flimsy padlock=99 method on my 7. It works well to keep the =98honest=99 people out. Sadly, the dishonest ones will get in no matter what kind of lock you put on it From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of thomas sargent Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 5:52 PM Subject: RV-List: locking up the plane It's kind of late to ask this, but how do folks secure their plane when they park it away from their home airport? I built my 6A canopy latch exactly as shown in the plans - it's two flimsy 1/8" pieces of aluminum. I could have drilled a hole in the 2 pieces to accept a small padlock, but I never did. It seemed pointless. The lock could snipped and my radios swiped in a minute. Does any one have any ideas/philosophy on this issue? -- Tom Sargent RV-6A ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 08, 2013
From: Tim Farrell <tim(at)AirCraftersLLC.com>
Subject: Re: locking up the plane
Did anyone post the Cleaveland Tool option yet? http://www.cleavelandtool.com/Canopy-Lock-for-Sliders-6-7-8-9/productinfo/RVCL/#.UWNNrcqGeO0 On 4/8/2013 4:05 PM, Dale Ensing wrote: > I have a 6A slider. My lock is in the slider side panel and goes into > the roller track. Works well, at least as a deterrent. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Apr 8, 2013, at 18:52, thomas sargent > wrote: > >> It's kind of late to ask this, but how do folks secure their plane >> when they park it away from their home airport? >> >> I built my 6A canopy latch exactly as shown in the plans - it's two >> flimsy 1/8" pieces of aluminum. I could have drilled a hole in the 2 >> pieces to accept a small padlock, but I never did. It seemed >> pointless. The lock could snipped and my radios swiped in a minute. >> >> Does any one have any ideas/philosophy on this issue? >> >> -- >> Tom Sargent >> RV-6A >> * >> >> >> * > * > > > * -- Tim Farrell - Aircrafters - Owner/Manager - (831) 722-9141 - www.aircraftersLLC.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stein Bruch" <stein(at)steinair.com>
Subject: locking up the plane
Date: Apr 08, 2013
Hi Tom, Ever since we had a customer get his airplane broken in to so the thieves could quickly steal his headsetsI quit locking my plane. You see, in the aforementioned case the customer with a 185 had recently installed all new glass (windows, windscreen, etc..) to the tune of over $5K on his plane; only to have the door wrecked and the window in the door broke so the thieves could steal a few hundred dollars in headsets! In our first RV6 we built in some good solid locks, but since then I just leave it unlocked. My opinion is now the best deterrent you can have is a nice quality canopy cover =93 it=99s likely that folks are looking for easy and fast targets and the canopy cover helps that out. Also note I had another very old friend many years ago with a C150 in an open hangar that got broke into; his solution was to drill a hole in both doors and run a rod all the way through the airplane with a padlock on it. All that did was mean the next time the criminals broke the window trying to get in! Just my 2 cents as usual. Cheers, Stein From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of thomas sargent Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 5:52 PM Subject: RV-List: locking up the plane It's kind of late to ask this, but how do folks secure their plane when they park it away from their home airport? I built my 6A canopy latch exactly as shown in the plans - it's two flimsy 1/8" pieces of aluminum. I could have drilled a hole in the 2 pieces to accept a small padlock, but I never did. It seemed pointless. The lock could snipped and my radios swiped in a minute. Does any one have any ideas/philosophy on this issue? -- Tom Sargent RV-6A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Subject: locking up the plane
Date: Apr 08, 2013
V2hlbiBJIGhhZCBhIFRpcCBVcCA2QSBJIHBsYWNlZCBhIHRvd2VsIG9uIHRoZSBkYXNoIHRoYXQg Y292ZXJlZCB0aGUgcGFuZWwgdG8gcHJvdGVjdCBmcm9tIHRoZSBzdW4uIEJ1dCBpdCBhbHNvIHBy ZXZlbnRlZCBwZW9wbGUgZnJvbSBrbm93aW5nIGV4YWN0bHkgd2hhdCB3YXMgaW4gbXkgcGFuZWwg dy9vIGJyZWFraW5nIGluLiBJZiBvdmVybmlnaHQgSSBhbHNvIHVzZWQgYSBjYW5vcHkgY292ZXIg bm90IHRoYXQgaXQgaXMgYSBkZXRlcnJlbnQgYnV0IGl0IGlzIGFub3RoZXIgc3RlcCB0aGV5IGhh dmUgdG8gdGFrZSBqdXN0IHRvIHNlZSBpZiB0aGVyZSBpcyBhbnl0aGluZyB3b3J0aCB0YWtpbmcu IEkgZGlkIGhhdmUgYW4gaW50ZWdyYXRlZCBsb2NrIG9uIHRoZSBjYW5vcHkgYnV0IGFnYWluIGlm IHRoZXkgd2FudCBzb21ldGhpbmcgbW9yZSBkYW1hZ2UgY2FuIGJlIGRvbmUgZ2FpbmluZyBhY2Nl c3MgdGhhbiB0YWtpbmcgdGhlIGVsZWN0cm9uaWNzLg0KTGlrZSBtb3N0IHRoaW5ncyB0aGUgdWx0 aW1hdGUgYW5zd2VyIGlzIHN0aWxsIHlvdXIgaW5zdXJhbmNlIHBvbGljeS4NCg0KUm9iaW4NCg0K RnJvbTogb3duZXItcnYtbGlzdC1zZXJ2ZXJAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbSBbbWFpbHRvOm93bmVyLXJ2 LWxpc3Qtc2VydmVyQG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb21dIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiBUaW0gRmFycmVsbA0KU2Vu dDogTW9uZGF5LCBBcHJpbCAwOCwgMjAxMyA0OjA4IFBNDQpUbzogcnYtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3Mu Y29tDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogUlYtTGlzdDogbG9ja2luZyB1cCB0aGUgcGxhbmUNCg0KRGlkIGFu eW9uZSBwb3N0IHRoZSBDbGVhdmVsYW5kIFRvb2wgb3B0aW9uIHlldD8NCg0KaHR0cDovL3d3dy5j bGVhdmVsYW5kdG9vbC5jb20vQ2Fub3B5LUxvY2stZm9yLVNsaWRlcnMtNi03LTgtOS9wcm9kdWN0 aW5mby9SVkNMLyMuVVdOTnJjcUdlTzANCg0KT24gNC84LzIwMTMgNDowNSBQTSwgRGFsZSBFbnNp bmcgd3JvdGU6DQpJIGhhdmUgYSA2QSBzbGlkZXIuIE15IGxvY2sgaXMgaW4gdGhlIHNsaWRlciBz aWRlIHBhbmVsIGFuZCBnb2VzIGludG8gdGhlIHJvbGxlciB0cmFjay4gV29ya3Mgd2VsbCwgYXQg bGVhc3QgYXMgYSBkZXRlcnJlbnQuDQoNClNlbnQgZnJvbSBteSBpUGhvbmUNCg0KT24gQXByIDgs IDIwMTMsIGF0IDE4OjUyLCB0aG9tYXMgc2FyZ2VudCA8c2FyZzMxNEBnbWFpbC5jb208bWFpbHRv OnNhcmczMTRAZ21haWwuY29tPj4gd3JvdGU6DQpJdCdzIGtpbmQgb2YgbGF0ZSB0byBhc2sgdGhp cywgYnV0IGhvdyBkbyBmb2xrcyBzZWN1cmUgdGhlaXIgcGxhbmUgd2hlbiB0aGV5IHBhcmsgaXQg YXdheSBmcm9tIHRoZWlyIGhvbWUgYWlycG9ydD8NCkkgYnVpbHQgbXkgNkEgY2Fub3B5IGxhdGNo IGV4YWN0bHkgYXMgc2hvd24gaW4gdGhlIHBsYW5zIC0gaXQncyB0d28gZmxpbXN5IDEvOCIgcGll Y2VzIG9mIGFsdW1pbnVtLiAgSSBjb3VsZCBoYXZlIGRyaWxsZWQgYSBob2xlIGluIHRoZSAyIHBp ZWNlcyB0byBhY2NlcHQgYSBzbWFsbCBwYWRsb2NrLCBidXQgSSBuZXZlciBkaWQuICBJdCBzZWVt ZWQgcG9pbnRsZXNzLiAgVGhlIGxvY2sgY291bGQgc25pcHBlZCBhbmQgbXkgcmFkaW9zIHN3aXBl ZCBpbiBhIG1pbnV0ZS4NCkRvZXMgYW55IG9uZSBoYXZlIGFueSBpZGVhcy9waGlsb3NvcGh5IG9u IHRoaXMgaXNzdWU/DQoNCi0tDQpUb20gU2FyZ2VudA0KUlYtNkENCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoN Cg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCi0tDQoNClRpbSBGYXJyZWxsIC0NCg0KQWlyY3JhZnRlcnMgLQ0KDQpPd25l ci9NYW5hZ2VyIC0NCg0KKDgzMSkgNzIyLTkxNDEgLQ0KDQp3d3cuYWlyY3JhZnRlcnNMTEMuY29t PGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuYWlyY3JhZnRlcnNMTEMuY29tPg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCl8tPT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09DQoNCl8tPSAg ICAgICAgICAtIFRoZSBSVi1MaXN0IEVtYWlsIEZvcnVtIC0NCg0KXy09IFVzZSB0aGUgTWF0cm9u aWNzIExpc3QgRmVhdHVyZXMgTmF2aWdhdG9yIHRvIGJyb3dzZQ0KDQpfLT0gdGhlIG1hbnkgTGlz dCB1dGlsaXRpZXMgc3VjaCBhcyBMaXN0IFVuL1N1YnNjcmlwdGlvbiwNCg0KXy09IEFyY2hpdmUg U2VhcmNoICYgRG93bmxvYWQsIDctRGF5IEJyb3dzZSwgQ2hhdCwgRkFRLA0KDQpfLT0gUGhvdG9z aGFyZSwgYW5kIG11Y2ggbXVjaCBtb3JlOg0KDQpfLT0NCg0KXy09ICAgLS0+IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cu bWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9OYXZpZ2F0b3I/UlYtTGlzdA0KDQpfLT0NCg0KXy09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0NCg0KXy09ICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgLSBNQVRST05JQ1MgV0VCIEZPUlVNUyAtDQoNCl8tPSBTYW1lIGdyZWF0IGNv bnRlbnQgYWxzbyBhdmFpbGFibGUgdmlhIHRoZSBXZWIgRm9ydW1zIQ0KDQpfLT0NCg0KXy09ICAg LS0+IGh0dHA6Ly9mb3J1bXMubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbQ0KDQpfLT0NCg0KXy09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0NCg0KXy09ICAg ICAgICAgICAgIC0gTGlzdCBDb250cmlidXRpb24gV2ViIFNpdGUgLQ0KDQpfLT0gIFRoYW5rIHlv dSBmb3IgeW91ciBnZW5lcm91cyBzdXBwb3J0IQ0KDQpfLT0gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAtTWF0dCBEcmFsbGUsIExpc3QgQWRtaW4uDQoNCl8tPSAgIC0tPiBodHRwOi8vd3d3 Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vY29udHJpYnV0aW9uDQoNCl8tPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09DQoNCg0KDQpfX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KTm8gdmlydXMgZm91bmQgaW4gdGhpcyBtZXNzYWdlLg0KQ2hl Y2tlZCBieSBBVkcgLSB3d3cuYXZnLmNvbTxodHRwOi8vd3d3LmF2Zy5jb20+DQpWZXJzaW9uOiAy MDEzLjAuMjkwNCAvIFZpcnVzIERhdGFiYXNlOiAyNjQxLzYyMDcgLSBSZWxlYXNlIERhdGU6IDAz LzI3LzEzDQpJbnRlcm5hbCBWaXJ1cyBEYXRhYmFzZSBpcyBvdXQgb2YgZGF0ZS4NCg= ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <kboatright1(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: locking up the plane
Date: Apr 08, 2013
I don=99t lock mine either. The canopy is easily a thousand dollars of parts, plus paint and another 100 hours of labor to rebuild if someone damaged it. My spare time is easily worth $100/hour to me, and shop rates are $75/hr, so a canopy replacement is pushing $10k in parts and labor (or opportunity cost). Add to that the downtime and the fact that the airplane is most likely to get broken into =9Con the road=9D where I=99d be SOL in many ways (away from home, no tools, no place to put the airplane, no place to do the work, etc) and I=99d much prefer that a thief just slide the canopy open and take what s/he wants. Kyle From: Stein Bruch Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 7:17 PM Subject: RE: RV-List: locking up the plane Hi Tom, Ever since we had a customer get his airplane broken in to so the thieves could quickly steal his headsetsI quit locking my plane. You see, in the aforementioned case the customer with a 185 had recently installed all new glass (windows, windscreen, etc..) to the tune of over $5K on his plane; only to have the door wrecked and the window in the door broke so the thieves could steal a few hundred dollars in headsets! In our first RV6 we built in some good solid locks, but since then I just leave it unlocked. My opinion is now the best deterrent you can have is a nice quality canopy cover =93 it=99s likely that folks are looking for easy and fast targets and the canopy cover helps that out. Also note I had another very old friend many years ago with a C150 in an open hangar that got broke into; his solution was to drill a hole in both doors and run a rod all the way through the airplane with a padlock on it. All that did was mean the next time the criminals broke the window trying to get in! Just my 2 cents as usual. Cheers, Stein From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of thomas sargent Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 5:52 PM Subject: RV-List: locking up the plane It's kind of late to ask this, but how do folks secure their plane when they park it away from their home airport? I built my 6A canopy latch exactly as shown in the plans - it's two flimsy 1/8" pieces of aluminum. I could have drilled a hole in the 2 pieces to accept a small padlock, but I never did. It seemed pointless. The lock could snipped and my radios swiped in a minute. Does any one have any ideas/philosophy on this issue? -- Tom Sargent RV-6A http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-Listhttp://forums.matronics.comhttp ://www.matronics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 08, 2013
From: Linn <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: locking up the plane
Go ahead and put on the flimsy lock. And buy a canopy cover. If they see something they want and can't get in easily they'll smash the canopy and get it. If they can't see in then that removes one of the criteria. the flimsy lock will keep out the 'mostly honest' and they'll go somewhere else. A simple cabinet lock will be much prettier ..... if you have somewhere to put it. Linn On 4/8/2013 6:52 PM, thomas sargent wrote: > It's kind of late to ask this, but how do folks secure their plane > when they park it away from their home airport? > > I built my 6A canopy latch exactly as shown in the plans - it's two > flimsy 1/8" pieces of aluminum. I could have drilled a hole in the 2 > pieces to accept a small padlock, but I never did. It seemed > pointless. The lock could snipped and my radios swiped in a minute. > > Does any one have any ideas/philosophy on this issue? > > -- > Tom Sargent > RV-6A > * > > > * > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 08, 2013
From: Tim Farrell <tim(at)AirCraftersLLC.com>
Subject: Re: locking up the plane
Kyle, You are right. Replacing an 8 canopy takes a long time. We are very familiar with the process. It's more like 40-50 hours in our shop, but we are still talking about 1000s of dollars. Out of sight out of mind seems like the best approach to me as well. If there is one place I would want to have the lock, however, it would be at AirVenture or other airshows. That way people can see the inside of your amazing airplane, yet you keep out the occasional over curious person. -Tim On 4/8/2013 5:29 PM, kboatright1(at)comcast.net wrote: > I dont lock mine either. The canopy is easily a thousand dollars of > parts, plus paint and another 100 hours of labor to rebuild if someone > damaged it. My spare time is easily worth $100/hour to me, and shop > rates are $75/hr, so a canopy replacement is pushing $10k in parts and > labor (or opportunity cost). Add to that the downtime and the fact > that the airplane is most likely to get broken into on the road > where Id be SOL in many ways (away from home, no tools, no place to > put the airplane, no place to do the work, etc) and Id much prefer > that a thief just slide the canopy open and take what s/he wants. > Kyle > *From:* Stein Bruch > *Sent:* Monday, April 08, 2013 7:17 PM > *To:* rv-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* RE: RV-List: locking up the plane > > Hi Tom, > > Ever since we had a customer get his airplane broken in to so the > thieves could quickly steal his headsetsI quit locking my plane. You > see, in the aforementioned case the customer with a 185 had recently > installed all new glass (windows, windscreen, etc..) to the tune of > over $5K on his plane; only to have the door wrecked and the window in > the door broke so the thieves could steal a few hundred dollars in > headsets! In our first RV6 we built in some good solid locks, but > since then I just leave it unlocked. My opinion is now the best > deterrent you can have is a nice quality canopy cover its likely > that folks are looking for easy and fast targets and the canopy cover > helps that out. Also note I had another very old friend many years > ago with a C150 in an open hangar that got broke into; his solution > was to drill a hole in both doors and run a rod all the way through > the airplane with a padlock on it. All that did was mean the next > time the criminals broke the window trying to get in! > > Just my 2 cents as usual. > > Cheers, > > Stein > > *From:*owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *thomas sargent > *Sent:* Monday, April 08, 2013 5:52 PM > *To:* rv-list > *Subject:* RV-List: locking up the plane > > It's kind of late to ask this, but how do folks secure their plane > when they park it away from their home airport? > > I built my 6A canopy latch exactly as shown in the plans - it's two > flimsy 1/8" pieces of aluminum. I could have drilled a hole in the 2 > pieces to accept a small padlock, but I never did. It seemed > pointless. The lock could snipped and my radios swiped in a minute. > > Does any one have any ideas/philosophy on this issue? > > > -- > Tom Sargent > > RV-6A > > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > *http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List* > ** > ** > *http://forums.matronics.com* > ** > ** > ** > ** > *http://www.matronics.com/contribution* > ** > ** > * > > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c > * > * > > > * -- Tim Farrell - Aircrafters - Owner/Manager - (831) 722-9141 - www.aircraftersLLC.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 10, 2013
Subject: locking up the plane
From: GLEN MATEJCEK <fly4grins(at)gmail.com>
I have face mounted avionics, which make them relatively difficult to steal. Additionally, the MO of avionics thieves seems to be to steal radios from plane A and then install them in plane B, selling the radios from plane B. That way the serial numbers don't turn up as being stolen. The relative rarity of face mounted radios makes that process exponentially more difficult. I do have a canopy lock, a desk drawer type that locks in the 0, 90, and 180 degree positions. The lock is in a beefed up and faired area of the aft canopy skirt and is oriented such that the canopy can open, lock closed, or stop the canopy about four inches open for secure ventilation on a hot, sunny stop on a ramp. A locking canopy cover will round out the protection. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Collins" <bcollinsrv7a(at)comcast.net>
Subject: locking up the plane
Date: Apr 10, 2013
I have a canopy cover but not a LOCKING canopy cover. I've never heard of such a thing. Tell me more. From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of GLEN MATEJCEK Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 6:50 AM Subject: RV-List: locking up the plane I have face mounted avionics, which make them relatively difficult to steal. Additionally, the MO of avionics thieves seems to be to steal radios from plane A and then install them in plane B, selling the radios from plane B. That way the serial numbers don't turn up as being stolen. The relative rarity of face mounted radios makes that process exponentially more difficult. I do have a canopy lock, a desk drawer type that locks in the 0, 90, and 180 degree positions. The lock is in a beefed up and faired area of the aft canopy skirt and is oriented such that the canopy can open, lock closed, or stop the canopy about four inches open for secure ventilation on a hot, sunny stop on a ramp. A locking canopy cover will round out the protection. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Baron Mobile Link System for sale
From: "CFCNX" <tomgoddard(at)ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Apr 10, 2013
Did you sell your system yet. If not I am interested. Tom Goddard Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=398417#398417 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 11, 2013
Subject: locking up the plane
From: GLEN MATEJCEK <fly4grins(at)gmail.com>
HI Bob- All it takes is a couple of webbing straps at the leading and training edges of the cover, with brass grommets at the ends. Token brass padlocks to connect them under the fusselage, and the semi-honest can't get access to look without doing permanent damage. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <John.Morrissey(at)csiro.au>
Subject: locking up the plane
Date: Apr 12, 2013
You guys have got it all wrong :) Borrow your kids pet Carpet Snake and leave it sitting on the seat while yo ur away from the plane - Not many people will open your canopy then :) In Australia we are required to provide some form of locking since the 9/11 security stuff came in. Cheers John Morrissey From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matro nics.com] On Behalf Of GLEN MATEJCEK Sent: Friday, 12 April 2013 9:51 AM Subject: RV-List: locking up the plane HI Bob- All it takes is a couple of webbing straps at the leading and training edge s of the cover, with brass grommets at the ends. Token brass padlocks to c onnect them under the fusselage, and the semi-honest can't get access to lo ok without doing permanent damage. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Subject: G3X certified WAAS GPS
Date: Apr 12, 2013
Save thousands on GPS 400W installed with G3X January 9, 2013 - posted in In the Air<http://garmin.blogs.com/promotions/i n-the-air/>, [G3X 2-screen]<http://featherfiles.aviary.com/2012-12-31/f77694d11/2f897e60 7236406b9108b6e1b83ca78f_hires.png>If you own a G3X flight display system o r if you're planning to purchase a G3X, you can take advantage of special r educed pricing on an IFR-certified GPS. Now through 12/31/13, the GPS 400W is available for just $3,995 when installed with a G3X system. Having a WAAS-certified navigator, like the GPS 400W, allows the pilot to f ly GPS and LPV approaches. It also provides the WAAS position source needed to comply with the requirements for ADS-B. [GPS 400]<http://garmin.blogs.com/.a/6a00d83451bb7069e2017c352c549f970b-pi> ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 14, 2013
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: RV-8 Canopy Half-Open Latch...
I found a pretty ingenious canopy half-open latch system from fellow RV-8 builder Mike Zeller. The pictures pretty much tell the story along with my YouTube video of the system in operation. The system has a free spinning cam and a latch that allows the canopy to be fully opened and closed normally. If you open the canopy just past half way, then pull it forward slowly, the cam will line up and fall into the latch perfectly and then will keep the canopy from sliding back any further! To close the canopy, you just pull on it and close it. To open it all the way, you just pull it forward a few inches, then slide it back all the way. The best part is that there is no chance of scratches on any paint and it seems to hold the canopy *very* securely in the half-open position. A pretty amazing piece of engineering. Van's should just include this system as a part of the stock canopy installation. The latch kit only comes with the black plastic parts and that little machined aluminum fitting. I needed a .125" spacer and wanted to use flush screws, so I fabricated some additional plates to go on either side of the latch. To give the whole thing a bit more strength, I made a backing plate out of .063" and added a couple of platenuts. All of the bits and pieces will get black power coated to match everything else in the cockpit, so you won't even notice its there when all's said and done! Super Cool! Here's a YouTube video I made of the cam and latch system in action: http://youtu.be/f0BSlcYxU4M Pretty cool. - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 120+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 15, 2013
Subject: RV-8 canopy latch
From: Vince Frazier <vincefrazier(at)gmail.com>
Available here: http://www.flyboyaccessories.com/store/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=82&products_id=277 Another video showing it in action: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goWhjqpzIIY&feature=youtu.be Thanks, Vince Frazier Flyboy Accessories 3963 Caborn Road North Mount Vernon, IN 47620 812-464-1839 1-888-8FLYBOY 1-888-835-9269 www.flyboyaccessories.com > From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com> > Subject: RV-List: RV-8 Canopy Half-Open Latch... > > > I found a pretty ingenious canopy half-open latch system from fellow RV-8 > builder Mike Zeller. The pictures pretty much tell the story along with my > YouTube video of the system in operation. The system has a free spinning > cam and a latch that allows the canopy to be fully opened and closed > normally. If you open the canopy just past half way, then pull it forward > slowly, the cam will line up and fall into the latch perfectly and then > will keep the canopy from sliding back any further! To close the canopy, > you just pull on it and close it. To open it all the way, you just pull it > forward a few inches, then slide it back all the way. The best part is > that there is no chance of scratches on any paint and it seems to hold the > canopy *very* securely in the half-open position. A pretty amazing piece > of engineering. Van's should just include this system as a part of the > stock canopy installation. The latch kit only comes with the black plastic > parts and that little machined aluminum fitting. I needed a .125" spacer > and wanted to use flush screws, so I fabricated some additional plates to > go on either side of the latch. To give the whole thing a bit more > strength, I made a backing plate out of .063" and added a couple of > platenuts. All of the bits and pieces will get black power coated to match > everything else in the cockpit, so you won't even notice its there when > all's said and done! Super Cool! > > Here's a YouTube video I made of the cam and latch system in action: > > http://youtu.be/f0BSlcYxU4M > > Pretty cool. > > > - > Matt Dralle > > RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" > http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log > http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log > http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel > Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... > > RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" > http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log > Status: 120+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer > Mode ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Subject: LOP Article - FLYING magazine
Date: Apr 23, 2013
There is an article on LOP operations in the April issue of FLYING. Yes I k now the May issue is in hand but I am just getting around to it. The articl e has a simple graph and discusses the physics of LOP ops. It also discusse s some history of why LOP ops and why there may be some historical misunder standing or the procedure. Peter Garrison is an advocate of LOP operations as I am but he even goes LOP right after takeoff and climbs out at 65% powe r or less. Not sure I would get acceptable climb rates but I may give it a try at some point. Article Name: The Passion of Mixture Robin ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Bill Judge <bjudge(at)gmail.com>
Date: Apr 23, 2013
Subject: Fwd: CALL TO ACTION
Greetings, So the fine folks at the forestry service have left recreational aviation out of many places in the planning directives that will serve as guidance for public land use for the next 25 or so years. Now is your opportunity to write them and ask that they keep aviation in the mix. Many of the airstrips in question are ones that are easily within the capability of any of the RV series of aircraft so this is in the best interest of all of us. Having places to fly sure is nice. If you want to write a letter please have at it, instructions to get you started are below. If you what to plagiarizer mine I welcome it: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p-6qb2m5O7Ji_NMoEyWWrprQB0NkMm2pgoxCotE 6Po0/edit?usp=sharing Try to change a few things at least... Take care, Bill RV-8, N84WJ, 889 hrs rv-8.blogspot.com ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Recreational Aviation Foundation <contact(at)theraf.org> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 1:46 AM Subject: CALL TO ACTION Dear William, *RAF CRITICAL call to action* *WE need your immediate help-------- Please Take action not later than April 29* *Background:* In 2012, through a collaborative effort involving the RAF<http://theraf.org/sites/all/modules/civicrm/extern/url.php?u2&qid =195669>, the USFS/USDA published a new Planning Rule<http://theraf.org/sites/all/modules/civicrm/extern/url.php?u3&qid =195669> to develop, revise and amend FS land management plans. This rule will replace the previous one written in the 1980s and will be the planning =93Bible=94 for the next 20-25 years. Through a collaborative process, the RAF and others were able to interject recreational aviation and the importance of recognizing airstrips as a valid part of USFS infrastructure into the *2 012 Planning *Rule<http://theraf.org/sites/all/modules/civicrm/extern/url.php?u 3&qid=195669> . Recently, the USFS released and is seeking public comment on the proposed * 2012 Planning Rule* *Directives<http://theraf.org/sites/all/modules/civicrm/exte rn/url.php?u4&qid=195669> *, a key set of agency guidance documents that will direct implementation of the 2012 Planning Rule. The proposed *Directives<http://theraf.org/sites/all/modules/civicrm/extern/url.php?u= 804&qid=195669> *contain agency policies that serve as the primary basis for internal forest planning management. *The Directives are critical to recreational aviation and USFS airfields*since they provide procedures and techniques to be used by resource specialists and planning staff engaged in land management planning for the national forests and grasslands. If we can get the proposed Directives to recognize aviation interests, the document will influence USFS planners and managers actions concerning airstrips for the next 20 years or more; and therefore, will positively impact the destiny of those airstrips. *In the past, neither the old Planning Rule nor the old Directives held any direct references to USFS airstrips.* Roads, trails, historic sites, and many other common infrastructure classifications were discussed in detail, but *not* airstrips. *Regrettably, the USFS draft of the new Directives is also devoid of references to recreational aviation or airstrips.* The new Directives will control planning on USFS lands for many years; therefore, we need your help to correct these critical omissions in the proposed Directives. *Prior to April 29th*, The RAF is asking you to please submit your comments and ideas concerning the proposed Directives via both email, and the U.S. Postal System mail: *USFS DIRECTIVES PUBLIC COMMENT EMAIL LINK<http://theraf.org/sites/all/modules/civicrm/extern/url.php?u5&qid =195669> * *Next, snail mail a copy of your comments to:* *USDA/FS Planning Directives Comments* *P.O. Box 40088* *Portland, OR 97240 * *Note: you can copy and paste into and out of the comments section of the USFS email page.* *Here are some key points you can build on while drafting your comments concerning the proposed Directives:* =D8 USFS airstrips are an important recreational and operational part of t he USFS infrastructure. Please ask the FS to change all instances in the Directives where *=93trails and roads=94* are referenced, to read *=93trail s, roads, and airstrips=94*. =D8 Some airstrips (built on natural meadows) predate historical trails an d roads. Therefore, some existing airstrips *may* also be historical sites; however, no mention of this possibility is made in the proposed Directives. Historic trails, roads, and buildings are discussed in detail, but not airfields. Please ask the FS to revise the proposed Directives to direct planners to explore whether any airstrips in their planning area may have historical significance. =D8 In many places throughout the proposed document, various forms of recreation are listed and discussed. The 2012 Planning Rule mentions aviation as a valid form of recreation. However, the proposed Directives do not mention aviation activities. Please ask the FS to include aviation as a recreational activity in the Directives wherever recreational activities are listed and discussed. =D8 Many USFS airstrips are maintained through joint efforts of the USFS a nd volunteer groups, (including the RAF). Please ask the FS to revise the proposed Directives to include guidance for planners on the importance of coordinating with volunteer groups within their planning area, when gathering information on airstrips. =D8 The Chief of the USFS, the heads of other agencies such as the BLM, an d the U.S. Congress, have all published comments on the significance of airstrips as part of an overall balanced public lands transportation system. Unfortunately, not all USFS planners and managers are familiar with the airstrips within their planning area. Please ask the FS to place greater emphasis on their airstrip infrastructure through direct inclusion of airstrip guidance and instructions to planners in the proposed Directives. =D8 The FS owns the airstrips; it makes little sense for them to be exclud ed from the Directives. Airstrips need to be an integral part of forest plans. Including them in the Assessment, Land Management, Monitoring, and Wilderness Evaluation Chapters of the Directives puts airstrips on the same planning level as roads, trails, and historical sites when forest plans are being constructed or revised. Please ask the FS to revise Chapters 10, 20, 30, and 70 to place airstrips and recreational aviation on the same planning footing as other listed infrastructure and recreational activities . =D8 Forrest Planners who may not have detailed knowledge of airstrips with in their planning area need to be given instructions on where that information can be found. The proposed Directives clearly outlines sources of information when accessing and planning for roads, trails, historic sites, utility corridors, and etc. Airstrips need the same considerations so planners will fully understand airfield planning requirements and issues. Please ask the FS to include sources of information on airstrips to planners by including sources of information about airfields in the proposed Directives. =D8 A revolution is coming within the next 10 years involving inexpensive to purchase, operate, and maintain electric powered airplanes. When this happens, recreational aviation pressures on USFS airstrips will increase. The Directives must provide planners the tools to recognize, assess, and adapt to this increasing demand. Adopting the proposed directives in their current form will not accomplish this task. Please ask the FS to revise the proposed directives to include recreational aviation and airstrips in order to encompass potential future demand on airstrips. *Hints to make your comments effective:* - When you write your comments, put them in your own words. Form letters and mass emails that are all the same are usually not counted as individual responses. - Be courteous and give constructive comments. FS planners have worked hard to make the proposed Directives the best they can. We=92re helping them see items they have overlooked. - Be sure to email your comments ASAP and for certain, no later than April 29, 2013. To date, the RAF has been very impressed by the collaborative process the USFS/USDA has put together to get this tough job done. There are a lot of dedicated FS folks out there who just don=92t think about aviation when planning. They=92ve never been required to do so; and, they may be ignoran t of the aviation thing we do. Our purpose is to change that situation so every time a plan is built or revised, any airstrips in that area will be included and provided for within that plan. That=92s not happening now; bu t, *with your help, we can change that situation.* Thank you for your continued support and participation in the RAF mission. Taking a few minutes now to assure recreational aviation's inclusion within the USFS Directives is a quick and easy investment for you; but, it will yield long term rewards for your children and grandchildren who may someday wish to enjoy the same aviation privileges you have. Helping now goes a long way towards protecting, preserving, and creating recreational airstrips on USFS lands. Those are the reasons you joined the RAF; so, let=92s get this done. *Questions? * Contact Bob Kay: rkay(at)theraf.org or Ron Normandeau: rnormandeau(at)theraf.org *Recreational Aviation Foundation* 1711 West College Street Bozeman, MT 59715-4913 United States 406-582-1RAF (406-582-1723) theraf.org<http://theraf.org/sites/all/modules/civicrm/extern/url.php?u=8 07&qid=195669> Join Team RAF! RAF Mission: =93Keeping the legacy of recreational aviation strong by preserving, maintaining and creating public use recreational and backcountry airstrips nationwide=94 ------------------------------ Click here to unsubscribe from RAF Emails<http://theraf.org/civicrm/mailing/optout?reset=1&jid=938&qid=1 95669&h=04a4cafd9259597f> ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jon Finley" <jon(at)finleyweb.net>
Subject: Fwd: CALL TO ACTION
Date: Apr 23, 2013
Totally agree Bill!! Even if you don=92t use these resources, please do the rest of general aviation a favor and send a letter. I use these strips for camping in my RV-3. They are a wonderful resource! A few examples from my blog: http://jdfinley.com/double-circle-airstrip-landing-video/ http://jdfinley.com/grapevine-arizona-backcountry-camping-trip/ http://jdfinley.com/negrito-fly-incamping/ http://jdfinley.com/me-own-backcountry-flightride/ http://jdfinley.com/saturday-at-3u2/ If you haven=92t already ' get out there and give them a shot! Jon From: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Judge Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 10:53 AM Subject: RV-List: Fwd: CALL TO ACTION Greetings, So the fine folks at the forestry service have left recreational aviation out of many places in the planning directives that will serve as guidance for public land use for the next 25 or so years. Now is your opportunity to write them and ask that they keep aviation in the mix. Many of the airstrips in question are ones that are easily within the capability of any of the RV series of aircraft so this is in the best interest of all of us. Having places to fly sure is nice. If you want to write a letter please have at it, instructions to get you started are below. If you what to plagiarizer mine I welcome it: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p-6qb2m5O7Ji_NMoEyWWrprQB0NkMm2pgoxCo tE6 Po0/edit?usp=sharing Try to change a few things at least... Take care, Bill RV-8, N84WJ, 889 hrs rv-8.blogspot.com <http://rv-8.blogspot.com/> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Recreational Aviation Foundation <contact(at)theraf.org> Date: Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 1:46 AM Subject: CALL TO ACTION Dear William, RAF CRITICAL call to action WE need your immediate help-------- Please Take action not later than April 29 Background: In 2012, through a collaborative effort involving the RAF <http://theraf.org/sites/all/modules/civicrm/extern/url.php?u2&qid= 195669 > , the USFS/USDA published a new Planning Rule <http://theraf.org/sites/all/modules/civicrm/extern/url.php?u3&qid= 195669 > to develop, revise and amend FS land management plans. This rule will replace the previous one written in the 1980s and will be the planning =93Bible=94 for the next 20-25 years. Through a collaborative process, the RAF and others were able to interject recreational aviation and the importance of recognizing airstrips as a valid part of USFS infrastructure into the 2012 Planning Rule <http://theraf.org/sites/all/modules/civicrm/extern/url.php?u3&qid= 195669 > . Recently, the USFS released and is seeking public comment on the proposed 2012 Planning Rule Directives <http://theraf.org/sites/all/modules/civicrm/extern/url.php?u4&qid= 195669 > , a key set of agency guidance documents that will direct implementation of the 2012 Planning Rule. The proposed Directives <http://theraf.org/sites/all/modules/civicrm/extern/url.php?u4&qid= 195669 > contain agency policies that serve as the primary basis for internal forest planning management. The Directives are critical to recreational aviation and USFS airfields since they provide procedures and techniques to be used by resource specialists and planning staff engaged in land management planning for the national forests and grasslands. If we can get the proposed Directives to recognize aviation interests, the document will influence USFS planners and managers actions concerning airstrips for the next 20 years or more; and therefore, will positively impact the destiny of those airstrips. In the past, neither the old Planning Rule nor the old Directives held any direct references to USFS airstrips. Roads, trails, historic sites, and many other common infrastructure classifications were discussed in detail, but not airstrips. Regrettably, the USFS draft of the new Directives is also devoid of references to recreational aviation or airstrips. The new Directives will control planning on USFS lands for many years; therefore, we need your help to correct these critical omissions in the proposed Directives. Prior to April 29th, The RAF is asking you to please submit your comments and ideas concerning the proposed Directives via both email, and the U.S. Postal System mail: USFS DIRECTIVES PUBLIC COMMENT EMAIL LINK <http://theraf.org/sites/all/modules/civicrm/extern/url.php?u5&qid= 195669 > Next, snail mail a copy of your comments to: USDA/FS Planning Directives Comments P.O. Box 40088 Portland, OR 97240 Note: you can copy and paste into and out of the comments section of the USFS email page. Here are some key points you can build on while drafting your comments concerning the proposed Directives: =D8 USFS airstrips are an important recreational and operational part of the USFS infrastructure. Please ask the FS to change all instances in the Directives where =93trails and roads=94 are referenced, to read =93trails, roads, and airstrips=94. =D8 Some airstrips (built on natural meadows) predate historical trails and roads. Therefore, some existing airstrips may also be historical sites; however, no mention of this possibility is made in the proposed Directives. Historic trails, roads, and buildings are discussed in detail, but not airfields. Please ask the FS to revise the proposed Directives to direct planners to explore whether any airstrips in their planning area may have historical significance. =D8 In many places throughout the proposed document, various forms of recreation are listed and discussed. The 2012 Planning Rule mentions aviation as a valid form of recreation. However, the proposed Directives do not mention aviation activities. Please ask the FS to include aviation as a recreational activity in the Directives wherever recreational activities are listed and discussed. =D8 Many USFS airstrips are maintained through joint efforts of the USFS and volunteer groups, (including the RAF). Please ask the FS to revise the proposed Directives to include guidance for planners on the importance of coordinating with volunteer groups within their planning area, when gathering information on airstrips. =D8 The Chief of the USFS, the heads of other agencies such as the BLM, and the U.S. Congress, have all published comments on the significance of airstrips as part of an overall balanced public lands transportation system. Unfortunately, not all USFS planners and managers are familiar with the airstrips within their planning area. Please ask the FS to place greater emphasis on their airstrip infrastructure through direct inclusion of airstrip guidance and instructions to planners in the proposed Directives. =D8 The FS owns the airstrips; it makes little sense for them to be excluded from the Directives. Airstrips need to be an integral part of forest plans. Including them in the Assessment, Land Management, Monitoring, and Wilderness Evaluation Chapters of the Directives puts airstrips on the same planning level as roads, trails, and historical sites when forest plans are being constructed or revised. Please ask the FS to revise Chapters 10, 20, 30, and 70 to place airstrips and recreational aviation on the same planning footing as other listed infrastructure and recreational activities. =D8 Forrest Planners who may not have detailed knowledge of airstrips within their planning area need to be given instructions on where that information can be found. The proposed Directives clearly outlines sources of information when accessing and planning for roads, trails, historic sites, utility corridors, and etc. Airstrips need the same considerations so planners will fully understand airfield planning requirements and issues. Please ask the FS to include sources of information on airstrips to planners by including sources of information about airfields in the proposed Directives. =D8 A revolution is coming within the next 10 years involving inexpensive to purchase, operate, and maintain electric powered airplanes. When this happens, recreational aviation pressures on USFS airstrips will increase. The Directives must provide planners the tools to recognize, assess, and adapt to this increasing demand. Adopting the proposed directives in their current form will not accomplish this task. Please ask the FS to revise the proposed directives to include recreational aviation and airstrips in order to encompass potential future demand on airstrips. Hints to make your comments effective: * When you write your comments, put them in your own words. Form letters and mass emails that are all the same are usually not counted as individual responses. * Be courteous and give constructive comments. FS planners have worked hard to make the proposed Directives the best they can. We=92re helping them see items they have overlooked. * Be sure to email your comments ASAP and for certain, no later than April 29, 2013. To date, the RAF has been very impressed by the collaborative process the USFS/USDA has put together to get this tough job done. There are a lot of dedicated FS folks out there who just don=92t think about aviation when planning. They=92ve never been required to do so; and, they may be ignorant of the aviation thing we do. Our purpose is to change that situation so every time a plan is built or revised, any airstrips in that area will be included and provided for within that plan. That=92s not happening now; but, with your help, we can change that situation. Thank you for your continued support and participation in the RAF mission. Taking a few minutes now to assure recreational aviation's inclusion within the USFS Directives is a quick and easy investment for you; but, it will yield long term rewards for your children and grandchildren who may someday wish to enjoy the same aviation privileges you have. Helping now goes a long way towards protecting, preserving, and creating recreational airstrips on USFS lands. Those are the reasons you joined the RAF; so, let=92s get this done. Questions? Contact Bob Kay: rkay(at)theraf.org or Ron Normandeau: rnormandeau(at)theraf.org Recreational Aviation Foundation 1711 West College Street Bozeman, MT 59715-4913 United States 406-582-1RAF (406-582-1723 ) theraf.org <http://theraf.org/sites/all/modules/civicrm/extern/url.php?u7&qid= 195669 > Join Team RAF! RAF Mission: =93Keeping the legacy of recreational aviation strong by preserving, maintaining and creating public use recreational and backcountry airstrips nationwide=94 _____ Click here to unsubscribe from RAF Emails <http://theraf.org/civicrm/mailing/optout?reset=1&jid=938&qid=19566 9&h=04a4c afd9259597f> ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 24, 2013
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Damaged aircraft @ GAI
A friend of mine was doing some night work the other day @ GAI and noticed a small plane at the approach end of 14 @ GAI. Later she also saw some deer - thinking they may have been related. Hopefully all are OK - and the deer are now locked behind the fence again. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Paul Rice <rice737(at)msn.com>
Subject: Sniffle Valve
Date: Apr 24, 2013
I landed my RV8 the other day and noticed that my engine was idling 100 to 200 rpm higher than normal with the throttle pulled all the way back agains t the stop. I suspected an air leak somewhere but no one egt was significa ntly higher than an other. I found that the sniffle valve was leaking air back into the induction system (not closing under vacuum) leaning out the m ixture causing a higher idle. Valve is 6 years old. Anyone else had this happen to them? PaulRV8360 hours ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Unleaded aviation fuel - what are our General Aviation champions
doing to make 91/96UL AVGAS available? (was Avgas UL 91 approved by Lycoming for the IO-540-D models)
Date: Apr 24, 2013
Not really RV related, so delete now if you like. While Lycoming is taking a much needed step toward a fuel that we can actually afford, I'm afraid our aviation champions simply reject any option other than a still non-existent 100LL drop in replacement. Below is an email I wrote to both the EAA and AOPA last January. EAA did not respond. AOPA sent a disjointed response about auto fuel availability in Virginia. Perhaps if we all pinged on AOPA and EAA they may hear us over the turbine noise. Carl I note with interest articles such as in General Aviation on aviation fuel predictions: http://www.generalaviationnews.com/2013/01/predictions-aviation-fuel-in-2013 /?utm_source=The+Pulse+Subscribers <http://www.generalaviationnews.com/2013/01/predictions-aviation-fuel-in-201 3/?utm_source=The+Pulse+Subscribers&utm_campaign=6f588e756e-TP2013&utm_mediu m=email> &utm_campaign=6f588e756e-TP2013&utm_medium=email After a couple of decades of study and discussion, my evaluation is we are on a trajectory toward avgas prices that simply end the private pilot aspect of general aviation. We no longer have the luxury of time to cling to the only acceptable option for 100LL as a full replacement drop in. I have reviewed the "70%/30%" argument; 70% of all piston GA aircraft can run on non-ethanol unleaded premium auto fuel based avgas such as 91/96UL, but the remaining 30% of the piston GA aircraft that need 100LL consume 70% of the fuel. This logic has run its course and now needs to be revised in the light of current realities. I also question if we can rely on this argument's base assumptions as they are untested by market demand as no affordable unleaded aviation fuel is readily available, and is a backward look at the legacy engine/aircraft population, not new engines/aircraft that would be tailored for a 91/96UL environment. For the private pilot segment of general aviation, a non-ethanol premium auto fuel type product like 91/96UL is exactly the right solution and the market base for the fuel makes it continued availability, at reasonable prices, assured. While it is not a perfect, the clock is running out on producing a 100LL replacement fuel. If such a full replacement is ever delivered, the price for this novelty fuel is already estimated to be $.50 to $1 per gallon more than today's 100LL. The added cost will accelerate the private pilot death spiral. Although there are a few FBOs offering non-ethanol premium auto fuel the market penetration is dismal. I also note little evidence of organized efforts to promote widespread FBO, engine and aircraft manufacture embracing of existing unleaded aviation fuel options. I recommend a new strategy. I believe we have opportunity to bridge this fuel gap by a managed portfolio of options. Some FBOs may choose to carry both 100LL and the lower octane unleaded fuel, others may carry only one or the other based on their customer demand. What is needed is advocacy to establish the required policies and regulations, and collaboration with fuel suppliers, FBOs, aircraft and engine manufactures, state and federal agencies. This will mitigate the primary obstacle for 91/96UL adoption, legal risk. While continued study of aviation fuel options is needed I believe we are at a tipping point. $6+ per gallon is not sustainable for the majority of private pilots paying for fuel out of their pocket. At the very least an affordable unleaded aviation fuel option would help slow the continued decline in the number of active private pilots. Immediate action is needed to make an affordable 91/96UL type aviation fuel widely available . -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mike Whisky Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 2:48 PM Subject: RV10-List: Abgas UL 91 approved by Lycoming for the IO-540-D models --> RV10-List message posted by: "Mike Whisky" < rv-10(at)wellenzohn.net> See press release from today <http://www.lycoming.com/news-and-events/press-releases/release-4-23-2013.ht ml> http://www.lycoming.com/news-and-events/press-releases/release-4-23-2013.htm l Not sure what the price difference of UL91 is compared to 100LL. Mike -------- RV-10 builder (final assembly) #511 Read this topic online here: <http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=399293#399293> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=399293#399293 http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List http://www.matronics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 24, 2013
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: RV10-List: Unleaded aviation fuel - what are our General
Aviation champions doing to make 91/96UL AVGAS available? (was Avgas UL 91 approved by Lycoming for the IO-540-D models) So far testing has not ruled out either the Swift Fuels 100UL, nor the GAMI 100UL as drop-in replacements. Since nearly 80% of all 100LL is burned by 20% of the fleet that requires it, you are unlikely to see any FBOs willing to carry two grades of fuel, thus a 100UL fuel will be the only choice. As it is, most of the recip cargo planes are already operating at reduced power from the 115/145 they were designed for. (Think DC-6, DC-7, etc.) Other commercial aircraft like C414, C402, C421, PA-31. etc. also require 100 octane minimum. The privately flown lower compression aircraft that can operate on 96 or lower octane only purchase something less than 20 % of avgas sold, so are very unlikely to ever have a separate fuel stocked for them. When FBOs needed to stock Jet A, that spelled the end of 80/87, as no one is going to spend the money to have 3 sets of tanks and pumps. On 4/24/2013 5:48 PM, Carl Froehlich wrote: > > Not really RV related, so delete now if you like. > > While Lycoming is taking a much needed step toward a fuel that we can > actually afford, I'm afraid our aviation champions simply reject any > option other than a still non-existent 100LL drop in replacement. > Below is an email I wrote to both the EAA and AOPA last January. EAA > did not respond. AOPA sent a disjointed response about auto fuel > availability in Virginia. > > Perhaps if we all pinged on AOPA and EAA they may hear us over the > turbine noise. > > Carl > > I note with interest articles such as in General Aviation on aviation > fuel predictions: > http://www.generalaviationnews.com/2013/01/predictions-aviation-fuel-in-2013/?utm_source=The+Pulse+Subscribers&utm_campaign=6f588e756e-TP2013&utm_medium=email > > After a couple of decades of study and discussion, my evaluation is we > are on a trajectory toward avgas prices that simply end the private > pilot aspect of general aviation. We no longer have the luxury of time > to cling to the only acceptable option for 100LL as a full replacement > drop in. I have reviewed the 70%/30% argument; 70% of all piston GA > aircraft can run on non-ethanol unleaded premium auto fuel based avgas > such as 91/96UL, but the remaining 30% of the piston GA aircraft that > need 100LL consume 70% of the fuel. This logic has run its course and > now needs to be revised in the light of current realities. I also > question if we can rely on this arguments base assumptions as they > are untested by market demand as no affordable unleaded aviation fuel > is readily available, and is a backward look at the legacy > engine/aircraft population, not new engines/aircraft that would be > tailored for a 91/96UL environment. > > For the private pilot segment of general aviation, a non-ethanol > premium auto fuel type product like 91/96UL is exactly the right > solution and the market base for the fuel makes it continued > availability, at reasonable prices, assured. While it is not a > perfect, the clock is running out on producing a 100LL replacement > fuel. If such a full replacement is ever delivered, the price for this > novelty fuel is already estimated to be $.50 to $1 per gallon more > than todays 100LL. The added cost will accelerate the private pilot > death spiral. > > Although there are a few FBOs offering non-ethanol premium auto fuel > the market penetration is dismal. I also note little evidence of > organized efforts to promote widespread FBO, engine and aircraft > manufacture embracing of existing unleaded aviation fuel options. I > recommend a new strategy. I believe we have opportunity to bridge this > fuel gap by a managed portfolio of options. Some FBOs may choose to > carry both 100LL and the lower octane unleaded fuel, others may carry > only one or the other based on their customer demand. What is needed > is advocacy to establish the required policies and regulations, and > collaboration with fuel suppliers, FBOs, aircraft and engine > manufactures, state and federal agencies. This will mitigate the > primary obstacle for 91/96UL adoption, legal risk. > > While continued study of aviation fuel options is needed I believe we > are at a tipping point. $6+ per gallon is not sustainable for the > majority of private pilots paying for fuel out of their pocket. At the > very least an affordable unleaded aviation fuel option would help slow > the continued decline in the number of active private pilots. > > Immediate action is needed to make an affordable 91/96UL type aviation > fuel widely available . > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mike Whisky > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 2:48 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Abgas UL 91 approved by Lycoming for the IO-540-D > models > > --> RV10-List message posted by: "Mike Whisky" > > > See press release from today > > http://www.lycoming.com/news-and-events/press-releases/release-4-23-2013.html > > Not sure what the price difference of UL91 is compared to 100LL. > > Mike > > -------- > > RV-10 builder (final assembly) > > #511 > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=399293#399293 > > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > > http://forums.matronics.com > > http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > * > > > * ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jef Vervoort" <jef.vervoortw(at)telenet.be>
Subject: LOP Article - FLYING magazine
Date: Apr 26, 2013
Robin, I would like to read this article. Do you know if it is available somewhere on the net? Jef Vervoort, Belgium. RV9A with XIO-320 and Airflow Performance, needs leaning on the ground, near sea level. Van: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] Namens Robin Marks Verzonden: dinsdag 23 april 2013 4:12 Aan: rv10-list(at)matronics.com; rv-list(at)matronics.com Onderwerp: RV-List: LOP Article - FLYING magazine There is an article on LOP operations in the April issue of FLYING. Yes I know the May issue is in hand but I am just getting around to it. The article has a simple graph and discusses the physics of LOP ops. It also discusses some history of why LOP ops and why there may be some historical misunderstanding or the procedure. Peter Garrison is an advocate of LOP operations as I am but he even goes LOP right after takeoff and climbs out at 65% power or less. Not sure I would get acceptable climb rates but I may give it a try at some point. Article Name: The Passion of Mixture Robin ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 28, 2013
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Canopy Cutting Made Easy!
The first step with any Van's canopy installation is cutting the plexiglass bubble out of the molding frame. For me, this went smoothly mostly thanks to an awesome tool called a "Roto-Zip" that is available from a local Lowes hardware store. I have a right-angle cut-off wheel attachment for it. I can't remember if this came with it or if I bought it separately as an accessory. In either case, it is a must have for this Plexi cutting. I got some 3.5" "metal cutting wheels" for it and I have to say it is the cat's meow when it comes to cutting the canopies out. The tool has plenty of power and doesn't bog down, yet it is very controllable and accurate cutting is pretty easy. Don't get me wrong, this is definitely a manly tool and it requires a fair amount of respect. But it has just the right weight and fits nicely in your hand. The right-angle attachment can be unlatched and spun in any direction in relation to the handle and cord, which is really nice. Highly recommend! - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 150+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DEAN PSIROPOULOS" <dean.psiropoulos(at)verizon.net>
Subject: LOP Article
Date: Apr 29, 2013
What prop do you have on the engine Jeff? I have an 0-360 with AFP conversion and I was using a wood prop for first flights. The thing had trouble with off idle acceleration and idling when hot. After 5 months of tinkering I finally discovered it was the flow divider. Don fixed it for free and things worked well for a few months. The airplane ran great, idled great and then seemed to revert to its prior condition but, after rechecking, it wasn't the flow divider and I never did figure out what exactly it was. When I was at 35 hours I installed a Sensenich FP metal prop which is at least 25 pounds heavier with a lot more inertia than the wood prop. The engine didn't have any more problems with quitting after landing because the inertia of the metal prop kept the engine turning through the roughness that would normally cause the engine to quit with the lighter wood prop installed. I finally messed with the idle mixture on the servo enough that the engine would idle smooth without the rough running cycles but that seemed to be a little too lean for off idle acceleration. When I would push the throttle in during a recovery from a power off stall or during touch and gos, the engine would sputter and run rough for the first 1/4 throttle and then smooth out and run well. It never quit under these conditions but it did bother me so I decided to richen the idle mixture a bit to stop that from happening. When I did that, the old rough running idle cycles reared their ugly head again but, at least no more sputtering off idle when hot. These rough running idle cycles occur after the engine has warmed up. When I start the engine (cold) it idles solidly at Don's suggested RPM (750) until CHTs get over 150 and the under cowl temps get warm. Then, suddenly it goes into this mode where the prop will spin several blades at 750 RPM and then the RPM will drop to apppx 600 for a few blades and then back to 750 RPM and, the cycle repeats itself. I think these RPM drops are caused by the engine loading up after it is warmed up but I can't be sure. When I first discovered the flow divider was sticking, it was acting that way but when Don repaired it, it was rock solid (after a mixture adjustment) at 750 RPM for a couple months, even with low inertia wood prop in the middle of a hot Florida summer. Then it reverted to its old self and caused some nuisance engine quitting after landing and taxiing. I checked the flow divider again but that was not the problem. When I've got the cowl off I always check the intake tube bolts and hose clamps to make sure they aren't loose and letting the idle go lean (but if my hypothesis is that the engine is loading up with excess fuel then an intake leak is not likely to be the problem so go figure). Bottom line is that if I leave the mixture full rich while idling and taxiing it is not nearly as big an issue with the metal prop due to inertia. But when I hear the engine start into the rough idle, that's my clue to lean the mixture and things smooth right out. I've been going to fly up to Don's and have him look at it and try adjusting it but haven't had the time. Leaning at idle works well and I would rather have to do that than have the engine sputtering during a stall recovery or go around. Just my observations after flying with the setup for four years. Regards Dean Psiropoulos RV-6A N197DM Tarpon Sprgs, FL (25 Meters MSL) ________________________________ Original Message _____________________________________ From: "Jef Vervoort" <jef.vervoortw(at)telenet.be> Subject: RE: RV-List: LOP Article - FLYING magazine RV9A with XIO-320 and Airflow Performance, needs leaning on the ground, near sea level. Jef Vervoort, Belgium. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jef Vervoort" <jef.vervoortw(at)telenet.be>
Subject: LOP Article
Date: Apr 29, 2013
Dean, My prop is an MT 3 blade. I also should correct myself: I do not have an AFP, but a Precision Airmotive Silverhawk EX5 VA1. The roughness in my case is best experienced after start-up when it turns some 1000-1200 RPM; I try to stabilize the RPM and then lean and see the RPM rise with some 200 to 250 RPM until I hear the engine is turning smooth and is at its maximum RPM. I did not have a real problem in the sense of the engine quit in the 40 hours of flying of the all new RV9A. I found the reading of the article by Peter Garrison very interesting, and understandable. What I also did is reading the complete instructions of Precision Airmotive, and I realize now that, apart from the installation instructions that I studied and followed with great care, I did not pay enough attention to the appendix that explains the Idle Speed and Mixture Adjustments. I will work on that one as soon as possible. Thanks for your reply and best wishes, Jef Vervoort, Antwerp County, Belgium. ---Oorspronkelijk bericht----- or Van: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] Namens DEAN PSIROPOULOS Verzonden: maandag 29 april 2013 7:21 Aan: rv-list(at)matronics.com Onderwerp: RV-List: LOP Article --> What prop do you have on the engine Jeff? I have an 0-360 with AFP conversion and I was using a wood prop for first flights. The thing had trouble with off idle acceleration and idling when hot. After 5 months of tinkering I finally discovered it was the flow divider. Don fixed it for free and things worked well for a few months. The airplane ran great, idled great and then seemed to revert to its prior condition but, after rechecking, it wasn't the flow divider and I never did figure out what exactly it was. When I was at 35 hours I installed a Sensenich FP metal prop which is at least 25 pounds heavier with a lot more inertia than the wood prop. The engine didn't have any more problems with quitting after landing because the inertia of the metal prop kept the engine turning through the roughness that would normally cause the engine to quit with the lighter wood prop installed. I finally messed with the idle mixture on the servo enough that the engine would idle smooth without the rough running cycles but that seemed to be a little too lean for off idle acceleration. When I would push the throttle in during a recovery from a power off stall or during touch and gos, the engine would sputter and run rough for the first 1/4 throttle and then smooth out and run well. It never quit under these conditions but it did bother me so I decided to richen the idle mixture a bit to stop that from happening. When I did that, the old rough running idle cycles reared their ugly head again but, at least no more sputtering off idle when hot. These rough running idle cycles occur after the engine has warmed up. When I start the engine (cold) it idles solidly at Don's suggested RPM (750) until CHTs get over 150 and the under cowl temps get warm. Then, suddenly it goes into this mode where the prop will spin several blades at 750 RPM and then the RPM will drop to apppx 600 for a few blades and then back to 750 RPM and, the cycle repeats itself. I think these RPM drops are caused by the engine loading up after it is warmed up but I can't be sure. When I first discovered the flow divider was sticking, it was acting that way but when Don repaired it, it was rock solid (after a mixture adjustment) at 750 RPM for a couple months, even with low inertia wood prop in the middle of a hot Florida summer. Then it reverted to its old self and caused some nuisance engine quitting after landing and taxiing. I checked the flow divider again but that was not the problem. When I've got the cowl off I always check the intake tube bolts and hose clamps to make sure they aren't loose and letting the idle go lean (but if my hypothesis is that the engine is loading up with excess fuel then an intake leak is not likely to be the problem so go figure). Bottom line is that if I leave the mixture full rich while idling and taxiing it is not nearly as big an issue with the metal prop due to inertia. But when I hear the engine start into the rough idle, that's my clue to lean the mixture and things smooth right out. I've been going to fly up to Don's and have him look at it and try adjusting it but haven't had the time. Leaning at idle works well and I would rather have to do that than have the engine sputtering during a stall recovery or go around. Just my observations after flying with the setup for four years. Regards Dean Psiropoulos RV-6A N197DM Tarpon Sprgs, FL (25 Meters MSL) ________________________________ Original Message _____________________________________ From: "Jef Vervoort" <jef.vervoortw(at)telenet.be> Subject: RE: RV-List: LOP Article - FLYING magazine RV9A with XIO-320 and Airflow Performance, needs leaning on the ground, near sea level. Jef Vervoort, Belgium. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 29, 2013
From: Tim Farrell <tim(at)AirCraftersLLC.com>
Subject: Re: LOP Article
Jef, Sorry to jump in here, and honetly I haven't had time to read all the thread, but if you are getting a 200-250 rpm rise when you pull back the mixture, you are running very very rich. You need to lean the mixture at the mixture screw. At sea level you should be set up slightly rich at full mixture, but not that rich. When you pull the throttle back (very slowly) while at idle (around 800 rpm) you should see a 25-50 rpm rise, right before the engine cuts out. Once you have the mixture leaned, then you can set the idle speed. Before that, back the idle speed screw off and just adjust with the throttle. We do this with two people, with the engine running. After each adjustment we clear the engine by running it up to 1500 rpm. Obviously, unless you are around competent airplane people who are comfortable working around a spinning propeller, you should probably shutdown between adjustments. One tip, to set the idle speed after you have everything dialed in, set the rpm to your desired idle rpm and pull the mixture, but don't touch the throttle. Then all you have to do is set the idle screw to touch the idle arm in that position. Engines are really expensive. I highly suggest paying a professional to give you a few hours of training on how to set them up, monitor them, check them, etc. It's money well spent. All the best. Tim On 4/29/2013 11:20 AM, Jef Vervoort wrote: > > Dean, > > My prop is an MT 3 blade. > I also should correct myself: I do not have an AFP, but a Precision > Airmotive Silverhawk EX5 VA1. > The roughness in my case is best experienced after start-up when it turns > some 1000-1200 RPM; I try to stabilize the RPM and then lean and see the RPM > rise with some 200 to 250 RPM until I hear the engine is turning smooth and > is at its maximum RPM. > I did not have a real problem in the sense of the engine quit in the 40 > hours of flying of the all new RV9A. > > I found the reading of the article by Peter Garrison very interesting, and > understandable. > What I also did is reading the complete instructions of Precision Airmotive, > and I realize now that, apart from the installation instructions that I > studied and followed with great care, I did not pay enough attention to the > appendix that explains the Idle Speed and Mixture Adjustments. > I will work on that one as soon as possible. > > Thanks for your reply and best wishes, > > Jef Vervoort, Antwerp County, Belgium. > > ---Oorspronkelijk bericht----- or > Van: owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv-list-server(at)matronics.com] Namens DEAN PSIROPOULOS > Verzonden: maandag 29 april 2013 7:21 > Aan: rv-list(at)matronics.com > Onderwerp: RV-List: LOP Article > > --> > > What prop do you have on the engine Jeff? I have an 0-360 with AFP > conversion and I was using a wood prop for first flights. The thing had > trouble with off idle acceleration and idling when hot. After 5 months of > tinkering I finally discovered it was the flow divider. Don fixed it for > free and things worked well for a few months. The airplane ran great, idled > great and then seemed to revert to its prior condition but, after > rechecking, it wasn't the flow divider and I never did figure out what > exactly it was. When I was at 35 hours I installed a Sensenich FP metal > prop which is at least 25 pounds heavier with a lot more inertia than the > wood prop. The engine didn't have any more problems with quitting after > landing because the inertia of the metal prop kept the engine turning > through the roughness that would normally cause the engine to quit with the > lighter wood prop installed. I finally messed with the idle mixture on the > servo enough that the engine would idle smooth without the rough running > cycles but that seemed to be a little too lean for off idle acceleration. > When I would push the throttle in during a recovery from a power off stall > or during touch and gos, the engine would sputter and run rough for the > first 1/4 throttle and then smooth out and run well. It never quit under > these conditions but it did bother me so I decided to richen the idle > mixture a bit to stop that from happening. When I did that, the old rough > running idle cycles reared their ugly head again but, at least no more > sputtering off idle when hot. > > > These rough running idle cycles occur after the engine has warmed up. When > I start the engine (cold) it idles solidly at Don's suggested RPM (750) > until CHTs get over 150 and the under cowl temps get warm. Then, suddenly > it goes into this mode where the prop will spin several blades at 750 RPM > and then the RPM will drop to apppx 600 for a few blades and then back to > 750 RPM and, the cycle repeats itself. I think these RPM drops are caused > by the engine loading up after it is warmed up but I can't be sure. When I > first discovered the flow divider was sticking, it was acting that way but > when Don repaired it, it was rock solid (after a mixture adjustment) at 750 > RPM for a couple months, even with low inertia wood prop in the middle of a > hot Florida summer. Then it reverted to its old self and caused some > nuisance engine quitting after landing and taxiing. I checked the flow > divider again but that was not the problem. When I've got the cowl off I > always check the intake tube bolts and hose clamps to make sure they aren't > loose and letting the idle go lean (but if my hypothesis is that the engine > is loading up with excess fuel then an intake leak is not likely to be the > problem so go figure). Bottom line is that if I leave the mixture full rich > while idling and taxiing it is not nearly as big an issue with the metal > prop due to inertia. But when I hear the engine start into the rough idle, > that's my clue to lean the mixture and things smooth right out. I've been > going to fly up to Don's and have him look at it and try adjusting it but > haven't had the time. Leaning at idle works well and I would rather have to > do that than have the engine sputtering during a stall recovery or go > around. Just my observations after flying with the setup for four years. > Regards > > Dean Psiropoulos > RV-6A N197DM > Tarpon Sprgs, FL (25 Meters MSL) > > ________________________________ Original Message > _____________________________________ > > From: "Jef Vervoort" <jef.vervoortw(at)telenet.be> > Subject: RE: RV-List: LOP Article - FLYING magazine > > RV9A with XIO-320 and Airflow Performance, needs leaning on the ground, near > sea level. > > Jef Vervoort, Belgium. > > > > > -- Tim Farrell - Aircrafters - Owner/Manager - (831) 722-9141 - www.aircraftersLLC.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 03, 2013
Subject: Constant Speed Prop leaking Grease
From: MLE <rv6awingman(at)gmail.com>
I've been flying my RV-6A behind a Hartzell CS prop for 3 years now and about 250 hours since new. For about a year, I've been noticing grease escaping where the prop halfs meet. I notice the grease on the back of one prop blade. Is this something that I should be concerned about? Prop has never been over greased. Marty ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 04, 2013
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Re: Constant Speed Prop leaking Grease
At 10:35 AM 5/3/2013 Friday, you wrote: >I've been flying my RV-6A behind a Hartzell CS prop for 3 years now and about 250 hours since new. For about a year, I've been noticing grease escaping where the prop halfs meet. I notice the grease on the back of one prop blade. Is this something that I should be concerned about? Prop has never been over greased. >Marty Hey Marty, I have a Hartzell on my IO-390 powered RV-8. I bought it new from Van's about 1999 and then it sat behind my couch until 2010 and I finally mounted it. At installation, I lubed it per the manual. I flew it 172 hours the first year and didn't have any problems with it, with the one exception of the small grease splatters on the back of the blades like you describe. Never got worse during that time, maybe got a little better. I attributed my splatter to the fact that it sat for so long and the seals got a little flat in storage for so long. Matt - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 150+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 04, 2013
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Top Aft Skin Question...
Well, its unbelievable, but I was cleaning the shop this morning and accidentally pushed the bandsaw (on a rollaround) into the back of the fuselage and put a scratch and dent into the Aft Top Skin. It wasn't yet riveted, but I was all finished and dimpled. I guess at least it wasn't the side of the fuselage where replacement would be nearly impossible. But still. Waa. Anyway, I went to order a replacement today and put in the part number "F-825" (F-825-1) is on the plans. I got two hits back: TOP SKIN, AFT F-825-1 $126.40 TOP SKIN, AFT -8 F-825PP $124.00 What's the difference? The PP suffix probably means "pre-punched", but I think the F-825-1 is probably pre-punched as well. My fuselage is late model, order last year in QB form. Thanks, Matt - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 150+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 04, 2013
From: Linn <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Top Aft Skin Question...
It must be a huge dent/scratch!!! I'm not anal enough to order a new skin .... I'd use the same lightweight body filler that I use on the other small dents. Of course I'm not going with a polished airplane!!! Linn On 5/4/2013 6:13 PM, Matt Dralle wrote: > > > Well, its unbelievable, but I was cleaning the shop this morning and accidentally pushed the bandsaw (on a rollaround) into the back of the fuselage and put a scratch and dent into the Aft Top Skin. It wasn't yet riveted, but I was all finished and dimpled. I guess at least it wasn't the side of the fuselage where replacement would be nearly impossible. But still. Waa. > > Anyway, I went to order a replacement today and put in the part number "F-825" (F-825-1) is on the plans. I got two hits back: > > TOP SKIN, AFT > F-825-1 > $126.40 > > > TOP SKIN, AFT -8 > F-825PP > $124.00 > > What's the difference? The PP suffix probably means "pre-punched", but I think the F-825-1 is probably pre-punched as well. > > My fuselage is late model, order last year in QB form. > > Thanks, > > Matt > > - > Matt Dralle > > RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" > http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log > http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log > http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel > Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... > > RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" > http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log > Status: 150+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 05, 2013
From: Bill Settle <billsettle(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Top Aft Skin Question...
Matt, I don't have the answer to your question and I don't want to change your thought process if that is the way you need to go, but as an alternative, have you considered one of the mobile auto body guys who do paintless dent repair? Depending on the scratch, they can do some pretty amazing things with dents. Bill RV-8 ________________________________ From: Linn <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com> Sent: Sat, May 4, 2013 6:52:50 PM Subject: Re: RV-List: Top Aft Skin Question... It must be a huge dent/scratch!!! I'm not anal enough to order a new skin .... I'd use the same lightweight body filler that I use on the other small dents. Of course I'm not going with a polished airplane!!! Linn On 5/4/2013 6:13 PM, Matt Dralle wrote: > > > Well, its unbelievable, but I was cleaning the shop this morning and >accidentally pushed the bandsaw (on a rollaround) into the back of the fuselage >and put a scratch and dent into the Aft Top Skin. It wasn't yet riveted, but I >was all finished and dimpled. I guess at least it wasn't the side of the >fuselage where replacement would be nearly impossible. But still. Waa. > > Anyway, I went to order a replacement today and put in the part number "F-825" >(F-825-1) is on the plans. I got two hits back: > > TOP SKIN, AFT > F-825-1 > $126.40 > > > TOP SKIN, AFT -8 > F-825PP > $124.00 > > What's the difference? The PP suffix probably means "pre-punched", but I think >the F-825-1 is probably pre-punched as well. > > My fuselage is late model, order last year in QB form. > > Thanks, > > Matt > > - > Matt Dralle > > RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" > http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log > http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log > http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel > Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... > > RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" > http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log > Status: 150+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Dave Saylor <dave.saylor.aircrafters(at)gmail.com>
Date: May 05, 2013
Subject: Re: Top Aft Skin Question...
I second that. We use a guy out of Hollister pretty regularly. He built a GlaStar. You might be out of his regular range but that's just an excuse to go flying! Justin @ Advanced Dent Repair: 831-636-3366 Dave Saylor 831-750-0284 CL On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Bill Settle wrote: > Matt, I don't have the answer to your question and I don't want to change > your thought process if that is the way you need to go, but as an > alternative, have you considered one of the mobile auto body guys who do > paintless dent repair? Depending on the scratch, they can do some pretty > amazing things with dents. > > Bill > RV-8 > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Linn > *To:* rv-list(at)matronics.com > *Sent:* Sat, May 4, 2013 6:52:50 PM > *Subject:* Re: RV-List: Top Aft Skin Question... > > > It must be a huge dent/scratch!!! > I'm not anal enough to order a new skin .... I'd use the same > lightweight body filler that I use on the other small dents. > Of course I'm not going with a polished airplane!!! > Linn > > On 5/4/2013 6:13 PM, Matt Dralle wrote: > > > > > > Well, its unbelievable, but I was cleaning the shop this morning and > accidentally pushed the bandsaw (on a rollaround) into the back of the > fuselage and put a scratch and dent into the Aft Top Skin. It wasn't yet > riveted, but I was all finished and dimpled. I guess at least it wasn't > the side of the fuselage where replacement would be nearly impossible. But > still. Waa. > > > > Anyway, I went to order a replacement today and put in the part number > "F-825" (F-825-1) is on the plans. I got two hits back: > > > > TOP SKIN, AFT > > F-825-1 > > $126.40 > > > > > > TOP SKIN, AFT -8 > > F-825PP > > $124.00 > > > > What's the difference? The PP suffix probably means "pre-punched", but > I think the F-825-1 is probably pre-punched as well. > > > > My fuselage is late model, order last year in QB form. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Matt > > > > - > > Matt Dralle > > > > RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" > > http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log > > http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log > > http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel > > Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... > > > > RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" > > http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log > > Status: 150+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer > Mode > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > No virus found in this message. > > Checked by AVG - > > * > > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 05, 2013
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Re: Top Aft Skin Question...
Well, according to Vans catalog, a new F-825-1 is $126. Any sort of "repair" is going to cost that much. I'll have to come clean and say that there are also a couple of rivet holes that got over dimpled and caused a weird border, so it doesn't really hurt my feelings too much to have to just replace it. None of the other "issues" were bad enough for a replacement, but yesterday's indiscretion kind of sealed the deal. I've rebuilt whole elevators for smaller imperfections. I'm just saying... ;-) Matt At 08:25 AM 5/5/2013 Sunday, you wrote: >I second that. We use a guy out of Hollister pretty regularly. He built a GlaStar. You might be out of his regular range but that's just an excuse to go flying! > >Justin @ Advanced Dent Repair: 831-636-3366 > >Dave Saylor >831-750-0284 CL > > >On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Bill Settle <billsettle(at)bellsouth.net> wrote: >Matt, I don't have the answer to your question and I don't want to change your thought process if that is the way you need to go, but as an alternative, have you considered one of the mobile auto body guys who do paintless dent repair? Depending on the scratch, they can do some pretty amazing things with dents. > >Bill >RV-8 > > >From: Linn <<mailto:flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com>flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com> >To: rv-list(at)matronics.com >Sent: Sat, May 4, 2013 6:52:50 PM >Subject: Re: RV-List: Top Aft Skin Question... > > >It must be a huge dent/scratch!!! >I'm not anal enough to order a new skin .... I'd use the same >lightweight body filler that I use on the other small dents. >Of course I'm not going with a polished airplane!!! >Linn > >On 5/4/2013 6:13 PM, Matt Dralle wrote: >> >> >> Well, its unbelievable, but I was cleaning the shop this morning and accidentally pushed the bandsaw (on a rollaround) into the back of the fuselage and put a scratch and dent into the Aft Top Skin. It wasn't yet riveted, but I was all finished and dimpled. I guess at least it wasn't the side of the fuselage where replacement would be nearly impossible. But still. Waa. >> >> Anyway, I went to order a replacement today and put in the part number "F-825" (F-825-1) is on the plans. I got two hits back: >> >> TOP SKIN, AFT >> F-825-1 >> $126.40 >> >> >> TOP SKIN, AFT -8 >> F-825PP >> $124.00 >> >> What's the difference? The PP suffix probably means "pre-punched", but I think the F-825-1 is probably pre-punched as well. >> >> My fuselage is late model, order last year in QB form. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Matt >> - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 150+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 06, 2013
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Re: Gear tower
At 09:02 AM 5/6/2013 Monday, you wrote: >--> RV8-List message posted by: Miller John > >New to the list and I did not find the answer in the archives (RV10 builder now building an 8). > >Asked Van's about cutting out the area between the lower and middle lightening holes to improve access to that area, especially the attach bolts. KenS sent me the following reply this morning: "We know that some builders have done this, but we've never found the need. We have no engineering data one way or another on such a mod so we have no basis for advice." > >Have any of the 8 builders done this modification and were you able to do any engineering analysis on resulting tower? > >I plan to cover this area with a plate using plate nuts as was described in one of the forums. > >Thanks - John Miller (Grumpy) John, I wouldn't do it. My experience has been that the gear towers in the -8 are a little underwhelming in terms of strength to begin with. The attached pictures show what happened to my RV-8 when I got it sideways during a high speed taxi incident. I had already landed and was making the turn off the runway onto the taxiway. I wish there was some engineered, accepted way of beefing up these gear towers. It would have been a lot less work than having to rebuild a whole new fuselage... - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 172+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer" http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log Status: 150+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MLWynn(at)aol.com
Date: May 06, 2013
Subject: Re: Top Aft Skin Question...
Hi Matt, Somewhere about four years ago the fuselage went from mostly pre-punched to matched hole. The pre-punched needed a jig for assembly and the matched hole did not. I got one of the first matched holes and it went together pretty painlessly without jigging. The question is, which one for your fuselage. I suspect your recent QB was done with the F-825-1 but you really ought to check with Vans. I understand perfectly the desire to get it perfect. I am busy polishing my fuselage (199 LVK if you want to stop by) and every little scratch and ding from assembly takes lots of work to polish out. There are a couple of little dents that I haven't figured out how to fix and/or hind. Have fun, Michael Wynn RV 8 Finishing San Ramon, CA In a message dated 5/4/2013 3:14:52 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, dralle(at)matronics.com writes:


December 29, 2012 - May 10, 2013

RV-Archive.digest.vol-vq