RV10-Archive.digest.vol-bl

August 15, 2006 - September 07, 2006



        Subject: Re: RV10-List: AN Clocking (again)
      
         
      
        Jessie
      
        Where did you get the Fuel/Seal lube?
      
         
      
        Bob
      
         
      
         
      
         
      
         
      
        In a message dated 8/15/2006 9:30:45 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
      jesse(at)itecusa.org writes:
      
          will try to answer in a way that has been recommended and has 
      worked.  When we first started, we would take the fittings to the torque 
      value, then clock them from there.  Yes, this takes a TON of pressure 
      sometimes, which is not good.  In fact, we had some leak when this 
      happened.  It was recommended by a very experience A&P that we use some 
      kind of thread sealer, Fuel/Seal Lube works great, then just run them on 
      as tight as we can get them by hand, then clock them from there.  We did 
      this on two oil cooler 
      
         
      
      
      http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Listhttp://www.matronics.com/cont
      8/14/2006 
      
        --
        8/14/2006
      
      
      =========================
      ==========
      =========================
      ==========
      =========================
      ==========
      =========================
      ==========
      =========================
      ==========
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: NYTerminat(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 15, 2006
Subject: Re: fuel lube
I didn't see it in their catalogue, do you have a part number? I had used some that I borrowed from an A&P to seal the fuel sender in another plane and I wanted to get some for myself. Bob In a message dated 8/15/2006 10:33:15 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, dlm46007(at)cox.net writes: A lifetime supply is available in a can from Aircraft Spruce. One pound will last you through all the aircraft you will ever build. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: fuel lube
Date: Aug 15, 2006
From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com>
Aircraft Spruce part number 09-25200. Sealube. $20.80 for a 1 lb can, which as someone said will be a lifetime supply. I used it liberally on the last airplane I built and maybe used a couple of tablespoons. Jack Phillips #40610 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of NYTerminat(at)aol.com Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 12:14 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: fuel lube I didn't see it in their catalogue, do you have a part number? I had used some that I borrowed from an A&P to seal the fuel sender in another plane and I wanted to get some for myself. Bob In a message dated 8/15/2006 10:33:15 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, dlm46007(at)cox.net writes: A lifetime supply is available in a can from Aircraft Spruce. One pound will last you through all the aircraft you will ever build. ========================= ========== ========================= ========== ========================= ========== ========================= ========== ========================= ========== _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilege d, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it i n error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: fuel lube
Date: Aug 15, 2006
check http://aircraft-spruce.com/catalog/cspages/ezturnlube.php ----- Original Message ----- From: NYTerminat(at)aol.com To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 9:14 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: fuel lube I didn't see it in their catalogue, do you have a part number? I had used some that I borrowed from an A&P to seal the fuel sender in another plane and I wanted to get some for myself. Bob In a message dated 8/15/2006 10:33:15 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, dlm46007(at)cox.net writes: A lifetime supply is available in a can from Aircraft Spruce. One pound will last you through all the aircraft you will ever build. ========================= ========== ========================= ========== ========================= ========== ========================= ========== ========================= ========== ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "KiloPapa" <kilopapa(at)antelecom.net>
Subject: Re: Serious Front Axle Maintenance Issue on the RV-10
Date: Aug 15, 2006
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Testement" <jwt(at)roadmapscoaching.com>
Subject: Door seal adhesive
Date: Aug 15, 2006
I am not having much luck finding a good adhesive for the door seal. What are others having success with? John Testement HYPERLINK "mailto:jwt(at)roadmapscoaching.com"jwt(at)roadmapscoaching.com 40321 Richmond, VA Finish kit - gear legs and wheels -- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: L Aune <lcaune(at)cablelan.net>
Subject: New to the list
Date: Aug 15, 2006
Les I am a builder from Kelowna working on the doors at present. I am an AME-M and an AME-S teaching aircraft structures for BCIT. If you ever get out this way I'll give you a mini start-up course which will safely get you started on this great project. Drop by or call Len 250-766-5456. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 2006
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Subject: Re: Door seal adhesive
3M Super silicone sealant. NAPA and auto parts stores carry it, or can order a caulking tube of it. From what I can tell, it's almost or exactly like regualar GE clear silicone sealant you could by at the hardware store. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying John Testement wrote: > I am not having much luck finding a good adhesive for the door seal. > What are others having success with? > > John Testement > jwt(at)roadmapscoaching.com > 40321 > Richmond, VA > Finish kit - gear legs and wheels > > -- > 8/15/2006 > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jesse Saint" <jesse(at)itecusa.org>
Subject: Door seal adhesive
Date: Aug 15, 2006
Plain old Silicone is the only thing that we could get to work. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. HYPERLINK "mailto:jesse(at)itecusa.org"jesse(at)itecusa.org HYPERLINK "http://www.itecusa.org"www.itecusa.org W: 352-465-4545 C: 352-427-0285 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Testement Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 1:59 PM Subject: RV10-List: Door seal adhesive I am not having much luck finding a good adhesive for the door seal. What are others having success with? John Testement HYPERLINK "mailto:jwt(at)roadmapscoaching.com"jwt(at)roadmapscoaching.com 40321 Richmond, VA Finish kit - gear legs and wheels -- 8/15/2006 "http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List"http://www.matronics.com/Navig ator?RV10-List "http://www.matronics.com/contribution"http://www.matronics.com/contribution -- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: NYTerminat(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 15, 2006
Subject: Re: fuel lube
Thanks Jack, the confusion is there are other products that sound like the same thing such as EZ turn lubricant"EZ Turn is the functional equivalent of fuel lube" P/N 09-00306 In a message dated 8/15/2006 1:12:22 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com writes: Aircraft Spruce part number 09-25200. Sealube. $20.80 for a 1 lb can, which as someone said will be a lifetime supply. I used it liberally on the last airplane I built and maybe used a couple of tablespoons. Jack Phillips #40610 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Door seal adhesive
Date: Aug 15, 2006
Just remember that silicone sticks to paint but paint will not adhere to silicone. ----- Original Message ----- From: Jesse Saint To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 12:01 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Door seal adhesive Plain old Silicone is the only thing that we could get to work. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse(at)itecusa.org www.itecusa.org W: 352-465-4545 C: 352-427-0285 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Testement Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 1:59 PM To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RV10-List: Door seal adhesive I am not having much luck finding a good adhesive for the door seal. What are others having success with? John Testement jwt(at)roadmapscoaching.com 40321 Richmond, VA Finish kit - gear legs and wheels -- 8/15/2006 http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Listhttp://www.matronics.com/cont 8/14/2006 -- 8/14/2006 ========================= ========== ========================= ========== ========================= ========== ========================= ========== ========================= ========== ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Russell Daves" <dav1111(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: RE: 'Y' for SCAT ducting
Date: Aug 15, 2006
Dear Mark & all the RV-10 crowd: I added the Y vent off the back baffle scat tube flange. I ran scat tube from the straight exit of the Y vent down to the heat muff and then from the heat muff to one of the heater vents. I aimed the open Y of the Y Vent towards the firewall right above the heater boxes. On the left side forward baffle scat tube flange I ran scat tube from it back to the other heat muff and then from the heat muff to the other heater vent. In case somebody hasn't read my other postings about the heater vent corrective actions they were as follows: I installed a gasket between the firewall and the heater vents. I installed RTV around the heater vent opening and door (put wax paper between the RTV and door) and using the door opening vent cables on the panel closed the door openings on the heater vents fully closed. After setup of the RTV I removed the wax paper which now allows the door to seal real good. I then put RTV all around the outside of the heater boxes and the firewall. I insulated the inside firewall with foil backed insulation and installed foil backed insulation on the bottom of the tunnel floor, and 1/2" soundproofing between the floor panels and the bottom skin. To date the forward part of the tunnel gets warm but not to hot to lean my bare leg up against the tunnel (no carpet or covering on either the floor of the tunnel yet, just bare metal). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Ritter" <mritter509(at)msn.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 2:07 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: RE: 'Y' for SCAT ducting > > Russ, > > Did you put a scat tube on the outlet side of the heat muff to dump the > heat overbroad? > > Mark > > >>From: "Russell Daves" <dav1111(at)cox.net> >>Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >>To: >>Subject: Re: RV10-List: RE: 'Y' for SCAT ducting >>Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:08:06 -0500 >> >>I did one Y vent off the back baffle scat tube flange. I didn't run a >>hose down to the heater boxes, only aimed the open Y of the Y Vent towards >>the firewall right above the heater boxes. >> >>I am in Lubbock, Texas 3200 msl and daytime temps have been 95-100. >> >>Best regards, >> >>Russ Daves >>N710RV Flying >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Rob Kermanj >> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >> Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 5:40 AM >> Subject: Re: RV10-List: RE: 'Y' for SCAT ducting >> >> >> Did you do this on both vents? What is the result and how hot is it >> where you normally fly? >> >> ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: spray ceramic heat barrier
Date: Aug 15, 2006
From: "Chris Johnston" <CJohnston(at)popsound.com>
Hey all - Just thought I'd pass along a bit of info... I'm at the point in the fuse that I'm trying to head off any heat issues (you all know what I mean) and I ran across this stuff. http://www.lizardskin.com I just got off the phone with the guy, and it seems like this stuff will be helpful. It's not cheap though...$189 a gallon. Heat rejection, moderate fire protection, insulation. Sounds pretty good. Also, according to the guy, the weight of the product after drying is 3lbs per gallon. Pretty good. Also, he says that it will stick fine to epoxy primer, and stays pliable, no cracking etc. I've ordered a gallon, and I'm going to test it out a bit and see if it lives up to all the hype. Oh - don't go ordering the sound control formula - I think the guy said that stuff weighs somewhere around 13lbs per gallon! cj #40401 fuse finished rolling my fuse skins!! Only had to reorder one :) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Testement" <jwt(at)roadmapscoaching.com>
Subject: Door seal adhesive
Date: Aug 15, 2006
I tried GE Silicon II and it did not stick. Also tried 3M super trim adhesive, and Goop. Maybe I need to scuff the rubber some more. John Testement HYPERLINK "mailto:jwt(at)roadmapscoaching.com"jwt(at)roadmapscoaching.com 40321 Richmond, VA Finish kit - gear legs and wheels _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 3:01 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Door seal adhesive Plain old Silicone is the only thing that we could get to work. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. HYPERLINK "mailto:jesse(at)itecusa.org"jesse(at)itecusa.org HYPERLINK "http://www.itecusa.org"www.itecusa.org W: 352-465-4545 C: 352-427-0285 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Testement Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 1:59 PM Subject: RV10-List: Door seal adhesive I am not having much luck finding a good adhesive for the door seal. What are others having success with? John Testement HYPERLINK "mailto:jwt(at)roadmapscoaching.com"jwt(at)roadmapscoaching.com 40321 Richmond, VA Finish kit - gear legs and wheels -- 8/15/2006 http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List http://www.matronics.com/contribution -- 8/14/2006 "http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List"http://www.matronics.com/Navig ator?RV10-List "http://www.matronics.com/contribution"http://www.matronics.com/contribution -- ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: re: AN Clocking (again)
Date: Aug 16, 2006
From: "McGANN, Ron" <ron.mcgann(at)baesystems.com>
Thanks to all for the responses - particularly John for stirring the pot on my behalf. I spent a fair bit of time researching the matronics archives last night and the very useful link that Rick provided. Clocking the fittings while achieving an acceptable torque really does seem to be a bit of black magic. One of the more telling pieces of info came from Rick's link to aeroquip: "Q: How many times can I reuse my fittings and adapters? A: Inspect sealing surfaces and threaded connections for signs of damage. If they appear to be in good condition, they may be reused. Tapered pipe thread connections are distorted each time they are reinstalled. Often after 3 or 4 tightening sequences the threads are stretched or distorted beyond practical reuse. " If the NPT type threads are distorted after 3-4 tightening cycles, this suggests to me that you really do need to tighten them a fair bit. At this stage, I will 'wing it' - as tight as possible while achieving the required clocking. I was going to use fuel lube, but based on list feedback, I will give the teflon paste (locktite 565) a try. cheers, Ron ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 15, 2006
From: "Pascal" <pascalreid(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: spray ceramic heat barrier
let us know when the day comes that you test this. Looks like a nice solution. Thx ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Johnston" <CJohnston(at)popsound.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 3:45 PM Subject: RV10-List: spray ceramic heat barrier > > Hey all - > > Just thought I'd pass along a bit of info... I'm at the point in the > fuse that I'm trying to head off any heat issues (you all know what I > mean) and I ran across this stuff. > > http://www.lizardskin.com > > I just got off the phone with the guy, and it seems like this stuff will > be helpful. It's not cheap though...$189 a gallon. Heat rejection, > moderate fire protection, insulation. Sounds pretty good. Also, > according to the guy, the weight of the product after drying is 3lbs per > gallon. Pretty good. Also, he says that it will stick fine to epoxy > primer, and stays pliable, no cracking etc. I've ordered a gallon, and > I'm going to test it out a bit and see if it lives up to all the hype. > > Oh - don't go ordering the sound control formula - I think the guy said > that stuff weighs somewhere around 13lbs per gallon! > > cj > #40401 > fuse > finished rolling my fuse skins!! Only had to reorder one :) > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Onesixright
From: "RV10Aviator" <mani.ravee(at)us.army.mil>
Date: Aug 15, 2006
Guys, its me, Mani. Lost my ID and had to make a new one. Oh well. One six right is coming live to a selected cities around the place. In digital Sony 4x projection. Tickets are available online at the link. Go to tours and you can buy it online from there. Aviators need to see it. My whole family is going. http://www.onesixright.com/ Also enjoy the videos and reading about it. Mani Ravee Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=55065#55065 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Lubricating UHMW Blocks
Date: Aug 16, 2006
From: "McGANN, Ron" <ron.mcgann(at)baesystems.com>
Question for today . . . I was finishing off the control activation and flaps last night and noticed a significant amount of friction between the UHMW blocks and flap torque tubes. Given that there are four such tube/block interfaces, the total amount of friction may create significant startup torque on the flap motor. I understand that the UHMW blocks are teflon based and therefore self lubricating, but is there a recommended way of reducing the surface friction with the torques tubes? Is lightly sanding or polishing the paint from the torque tubes or inside of the bushing, or using an additional lubricant preferred?? thanks in advance (yet again) Ron #187 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jesse Saint" <jesse(at)itecusa.org>
Subject: Lubricating UHMW Blocks
Date: Aug 15, 2006
They do go in pretty tight, but that doesn=92t seem to make any difference on the functionality of the flaps. I am sure, with the torque on the flap motor, it is probably better to have them tight and add a little bit of torque than to have them loose and add the possibility of vibration/movement in the system. I would think that the amount of torque in the plastic blocks would be substantially less than the torque of dropping the flaps from 0 to 15 or 15 to 30 degrees at 100kts/mph, whichever the max flap speed is. We haven=92t used any lubrication or modified the parts at all. Anybody else out there with different experiences? Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. HYPERLINK "mailto:jesse(at)itecusa.org"jesse(at)itecusa.org HYPERLINK "http://www.itecusa.org"www.itecusa.org W: 352-465-4545 C: 352-427-0285 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of McGANN, Ron Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:05 PM Subject: RV10-List: Lubricating UHMW Blocks Question for today . . . I was finishing off the control activation and flaps last night and noticed a significant amount of friction between the UHMW blocks and flap torque tubes. Given that there are four such tube/block interfaces, the total amount of friction may create significant startup torque on the flap motor. I understand that the UHMW blocks are teflon based and therefore self lubricating, but is there a recommended way of reducing the surface friction with the torques tubes? Is lightly sanding or polishing the paint from the torque tubes or inside of the bushing, or using an additional lubricant preferred?? thanks in advance (yet again) Ron #187 ========================= ========== "http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List"http://www.matronics.com/Na vig ator?RV10-List ========================= ========== "http://forums.matronics.com"http://forums.matronics.com ========================= ========== "http://wiki.matronics.com"http://wiki.matronics.com ========================= ========== "http://www.matronics.com/contribution"http://www.matronics.com/contribut ion ========================= ========== 8/14/2006 -- 8/14/2006 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Marcus Cooper" <coop85(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Lubricating UHMW Blocks
Date: Aug 15, 2006
Ron, I opted for the light sanding and it seemed to help a lot. Marcus 40286 First flight (attempt) this Saturday! _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of McGANN, Ron Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:05 PM Subject: RV10-List: Lubricating UHMW Blocks Question for today . . . I was finishing off the control activation and flaps last night and noticed a significant amount of friction between the UHMW blocks and flap torque tubes. Given that there are four such tube/block interfaces, the total amount of friction may create significant startup torque on the flap motor. I understand that the UHMW blocks are teflon based and therefore self lubricating, but is there a recommended way of reducing the surface friction with the torques tubes? Is lightly sanding or polishing the paint from the torque tubes or inside of the bushing, or using an additional lubricant preferred?? thanks in advance (yet again) Ron #187 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Dunne" <acs(at)acspropeller.com.au>
Subject: Lubricating UHMW Blocks
Date: Aug 16, 2006
Ron, I used a scotchbrite pad on the tube...checked the flap motor with a 12V supply..minimum friction. John 40315 From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of McGANN, Ron Sent: Wednesday, 16 August 2006 12:05 PM Subject: RV10-List: Lubricating UHMW Blocks Question for today . . . I was finishing off the control activation and flaps last night and noticed a significant amount of friction between the UHMW blocks and flap torque tubes. Given that there are four such tube/block interfaces, the total amount of friction may create significant startup torque on the flap motor. I understand that the UHMW blocks are teflon based and therefore self lubricating, but is there a recommended way of reducing the surface friction with the torques tubes? Is lightly sanding or polishing the paint from the torque tubes or inside of the bushing, or using an additional lubricant preferred?? thanks in advance (yet again) Ron #187 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom Ganster" <tganster(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: please remove me from the list
Date: Aug 16, 2006
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 16, 2006
From: "John N. Strain II" <aircarepros(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Air Vent Recommendation
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 07:03:21 -0700 (PDT) From: "John N. Strain II" <aircarepros(at)yahoo.com> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Air Vent Recommendation I am attatching a photo of even another option for vents. These vents are the most highly styled available and provide more air movement than any of the others that have been mentioned. They were displayed in the Flightline AC booth as an upgrade option to our ac systems. They mount thru a skin (overhead or panel) by drilling a 2.5" hole and are held in place by a threaded fitting that can accept a 2.5" hose, or they are trimmed to allow for use in an overhead panel. They fully close off, partially open, and fully open via a telescoping mechanism and rotate 360' to be able to focus air movement. They are a machined aluminum part. They sell for $125.00 each. Flightline AC # is 541-330-5466 John S. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Lauritsen - Work" <mike(at)cleavelandtool.com>
Subject: Cleaveland Tool Sale
Date: Aug 16, 2006
I wanted to announce a rare sale that we are having at Cleaveland Aircraft Tool. We try and keep prices reasonable all the time rather than running specials, however our inventory level is just too high after the summer show season has come to an end. As a result we have decided to have an "inventory reduction sale" or a give-away sale as I like to call it as all of the items are at, near, or below our cost. Some of the items are: Clekos (you will never see Wedgeloc brand clekos at this price) 3M wheels Air Drills Wire Twisters Unibits and hole cutter sets Dimple dies Many others. Check out the whole list at http://www.cleavelandtoolstore.com/specials.asp be sure to click into the "special pricing" on each item to see the sale price. The items will drop off as inventory levels come down so act fast. Retroactive discounts will not be given for previous orders. Mike Lauritsen Cleaveland Aircraft Tool 2225 First St. Boone, Iowa 50036 515-432-6794 mike(at)cleavelandtool.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 16, 2006
From: "Pascal" <pascalreid(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: please remove me from the list- resolution
Although we are always willing to help with the buildiong, this is one you'll have to do for yourself. **************************************** *** How to Subscribe and Unsubscribe *** **************************************** Simply go to the Web Page shown below and enter your email address and select the List(s) that you wish to subscribe or unsubscribed from. You may also use the handy "Find" function to determine the exact syntax of your email address as it is subscribed to the List. Please see the complete instructions at the top of the Web Page for more information. The Subscribe/Unsubscribe web page is: http://www.matronics.com/subscribe ----- Original Message ----- From: Tom Ganster To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 4:09 AM Subject: RV10-List: please remove me from the list ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Air Vent Recommendation
Date: Aug 16, 2006
From: "Tim Dawson-Townsend" <Tdawson(at)avidyne.com>
Looks like the vent from an old Camaro. Your post got truncated at the most important part - the price! Don't leave us in suspense! TDT 40025 ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John N. Strain II Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 10:18 AM Subject: RV10-List: Air Vent Recommendation Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 07:03:21 -0700 (PDT) From: "John N. Strain II" <aircarepros(at)yahoo.com> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Air Vent Recommendation To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com I am attatching a photo of even another option for vents. These vents are the most highly styled available and provide more air movement than any of the others that have been mentioned. They were displayed in the Flightline AC booth as an upgrade option to our ac systems. They mount thru a skin (overhead or panel) by drilling a 2.5" hole and are held in place by a threaded fitting that can accept a 2.5" hose, or they are trimmed to allow for use in an overhead panel. They fully close off, partially open, and fully open via a telescoping mechanism and rotate 360' to be able to focus air movement. They are a machined aluminum part. They sell for ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hasbrouck" <jhasbrouck(at)woh.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Insurance for first flight
Date: Aug 16, 2006
The only instance that comes to mind for " required " insurance would be a lender requiring hull insurance if the plane was collateral for a loan. Other than that, you're on your own. ( at least here in Ohio ). The wisdom of "going naked" is different issue though. John Hasbrouck ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Byron Gillespie" <bgill1(at)charter.net>
Subject: Overhead Console - Lighting
Date: Aug 16, 2006
For some others that are utilizing the Chevrolet overhead console, I have found some decent LED lights that are a perfect retrofit. I wanted to ditch the factory white ones so began playing around fabricating some bulbs - they worked great but were time consuming to fabricate. I checked at my favorite store and found some options to investigate. I bought 4 Red LED bulbs for the map lights and a blue for the dome light. I bought several others to try out but these are the best I found. All look great. The seller on eBay that I used was "velocityled_1" there are likely others but he was super fast and very professional to deal with. They are set for 12V automotive application so are already set with resistors and diode for current protection. The power draw is 0.05A each - all 5 lights lit up .25A Eyeball - "VELOCITY LEDS SUPER RED HIGH POWER LED BULB 194 168 158" - 2 for 8.99+S&H Console - "SUPER BLUE HIGH POWER LED BULB 211-2 212-2 214-2" - 1 for 6.99 + S&H (can combine) Just another custom option. Byron - #40253 - N253RV assigned - more finishing, wiring, and firewall forward ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 16, 2006
From: "John N. Strain II" <aircarepros(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Air Vent Recommendation
$125.00 each Tim Dawson-Townsend wrote: v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) } Looks like the vent from an old Camaro. Your post got truncated at the most important part the price! Dont leave us in suspense! TDT 40025 --------------------------------- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John N. Strain II Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 10:18 AM Subject: RV10-List: Air Vent Recommendation Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 07:03:21 -0700 (PDT) From: "John N. Strain II" <aircarepros(at)yahoo.com> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Air Vent Recommendation I am attatching a photo of even another option for vents. These vents are the most highly styled available and provide more air movement than any of the others that have been mentioned. They were displayed in the Flightline AC booth as an upgrade option to our ac systems. They mount thru a skin (overhead or panel) by drilling a 2.5" hole and are held in place by a threaded fitting that can accept a 2.5" hose, or they are trimmed to allow for use in an overhead panel. They fully close off, partially open, and fully open via a telescoping mechanism and rotate 360' to be able to focus air movement. They are a machined aluminum part. They sell for --------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Belue, Kevin" <KBelue@drs-tem.com>
Subject: Overhead Console
Date: Aug 16, 2006
I have an overhead console from a '95 Chevy Blazer that I've decided not to use. It is in used condition and looks good, except for a slight cut in the fabric on one side. I'd like to sell it - $37 including shipping in the US only, which is what I paid. Kevin D. Belue ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "SteinAir, Inc." <stein(at)steinair.com>
Subject: Air Vent Recommendation
Date: Aug 16, 2006
You are correct. The small ones need a hole (OD) or 2", the large ones need a hole (OD) of 2.8" or nearly 3". Cheers, Stein. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Tim Dawson-Townsend Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 2:46 PM To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RE: RV10-List: Air Vent Recommendation So, Stein, you need about 2 inches of panel space for the 1.25 vent and 3 inches of space for the 2 vent? TDT 40025 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Testement" <jwt(at)roadmapscoaching.com>
Subject: Overhead Console
Date: Aug 16, 2006
Kevin I will take your console. I will be out of town until Monday. We can discuss details then. John Testement jwt(at)roadmapscoaching.com 40321 Richmond, VA Finish kit - gear legs and wheels -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Belue, Kevin Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 7:09 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Overhead Console I have an overhead console from a '95 Chevy Blazer that I've decided not to use. It is in used condition and looks good, except for a slight cut in the fabric on one side. I'd like to sell it - $37 including shipping in the US only, which is what I paid. Kevin D. Belue -- -- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Overhead Console - Lighting
Date: Aug 16, 2006
another link to LEDs. http://www.superbrightleds.com/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Byron Gillespie" <bgill1(at)charter.net> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 3:36 PM Subject: RV10-List: Overhead Console - Lighting > > For some others that are utilizing the Chevrolet overhead console, I > have found some decent LED lights that are a perfect retrofit. I wanted > to ditch the factory white ones so began playing around fabricating some > bulbs - they worked great but were time consuming to fabricate. I > checked at my favorite store and found some options to investigate. I > bought 4 Red LED bulbs for the map lights and a blue for the dome light. > I bought several others to try out but these are the best I found. All > look great. The seller on eBay that I used was "velocityled_1" there are > likely others but he was super fast and very professional to deal with. > They are set for 12V automotive application so are already set with > resistors and diode for current protection. > > The power draw is 0.05A each - all 5 lights lit up .25A > > Eyeball - "VELOCITY LEDS SUPER RED HIGH POWER LED BULB 194 168 158" > - 2 for 8.99+S&H > Console - "SUPER BLUE HIGH POWER LED BULB 211-2 212-2 214-2" > - 1 for 6.99 + S&H (can combine) > > Just another custom option. > > Byron - #40253 - N253RV assigned - more finishing, wiring, and firewall > forward > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Belue, Kevin" <KBelue@drs-tem.com>
Subject: Overhead Console
Date: Aug 17, 2006
Ok, John. Contact me off-list when you're ready. Kevin D. Belue > -----Original Message----- > From: John Testement [mailto:jwt(at)roadmapscoaching.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 6:56 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RE: RV10-List: Overhead Console > > > Kevin > > I will take your console. I will be out of town until Monday. We can > discuss details then. > > John Testement > jwt(at)roadmapscoaching.com > 40321 > Richmond, VA > Finish kit - gear legs and wheels > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Belue, Kevin > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 7:09 PM > To: 'rv10-list(at)matronics.com' > Subject: RE: RV10-List: Overhead Console > > > I have an overhead console from a '95 Chevy Blazer that I've decided not to > use. It is in used condition and looks good, except for a slight cut in the > fabric on one side. I'd like to sell it - $37 including shipping in the US > only, which is what I paid. > > Kevin D. Belue > > > > > > > -- > > > -- > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net>
Subject: Re: door seal (was Overhead Console)
Date: Aug 17, 2006
Thanks Larry, that's what I was trying to find. I actually had found it from a response from Mark Ritter, but thank you for responding. I also found out that Alex De Dominicis will be carrying them on his web site for a liitle bit less than what you can buy them for at AirCraft Door Seals. Here is Alex's web site address, if anyone is interested. I don't think they are posted yet be he has them available. http://www.rvtraining.com/html/aviationtechproducts.html Alex also does RV10 transition training here in the Dallas/Fort Worth area if anyone is interested in transition training. I will be doing my transition training with him. His RV10 has air conditioning for the hot weather here. Alex is an Air Traffic Controller here in the DFW area. http://www.rvtraining.com/ Wayne Edgerton #40336 gonna try and start on the wheel pants which everyone says is really great fun ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net>
Subject: Re: door seal (was Overhead Console)
Date: Aug 17, 2006
Hi again Larry, I forgot to answer your question on what I found out on price of the seals. The people at AIrcraft Door Seals said the seals would be $69.95 per door and $39.95 for the baggage door. I talked breifly with Alex on my cell when I was in Lowes yesterday so I can't remember his exact price but he was in the $56 per door range or something like that. I've got to call him back on the exact price. He said he should have in posted to his site real soon. Wayne Edgerton #40336 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net>
Subject: Re: Insurance for buildingInsurance for first flight
Date: Aug 17, 2006
HI Michael, I have mine insured (actually I just noticed underinsured) with Avemco. I currently have $100,000 coverage and it's costing me $865 a year. My notes say for $80,000 it would be $708. Wayne Edgerton #40336 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Ritter" <mritter509(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: door seal (was Overhead Console)
Date: Aug 17, 2006
My son and I did transition training with Alex. In addition to being a great guy you will love the A/C. It's going to be 104 today in Austin. Mark >From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: Re: RV10-List: door seal (was Overhead Console) >Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 06:48:06 -0500 > >Thanks Larry, that's what I was trying to find. I actually had found it >from a response from Mark Ritter, but thank you for responding. I also >found out that Alex De Dominicis will be carrying them on his web site for >a liitle bit less than what you can buy them for at AirCraft Door Seals. >Here is Alex's web site address, if anyone is interested. I don't think >they are posted yet be he has them available. > >http://www.rvtraining.com/html/aviationtechproducts.html > >Alex also does RV10 transition training here in the Dallas/Fort Worth area >if anyone is interested in transition training. I will be doing my >transition training with him. His RV10 has air conditioning for the hot >weather here. Alex is an Air Traffic Controller here in the DFW area. > >http://www.rvtraining.com/ > > >Wayne Edgerton #40336 > >gonna try and start on the wheel pants which everyone says is really great >fun ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Insurance for first flight
Date: Aug 17, 2006
From: "Lockamy, Jack L" <jack.lockamy(at)navy.mil>
Most public airports REQUIRE One-Million Dollars of LIABILITY Insurance before you can 'legally' hangar, tiedown, store or operate your aircraft on the airport public property. Check with the local Airport Manager. I had to name my airport on my insurance policy in order for the airport to be covered in case of a loss. I don't have a million dollars in my checking account so I had to purchase this coverage from somebody that does (Falcon Insurance Broker, AIG underwriter). HULL insurance or as some refer to it as 'collision', is NOT required. If you have deep pockets and/or can afford to self-insure your $100K plus RV-10, go for it. Most homebuilders I know can not afford to lose $100K, therefore we buy insurance. I had the million dollar liability insurance and NO HULL on my Sonex (N164JL) and had a very unfortunate crash that I tell others cost me $35K in less than 10 seconds when the prop hub disconnected from the crankshaft. That was a very big blow to my savings account and I learned the hard way. It can happen to anybody. Can you handle the financial loss if it happened to you? My current aircraft (RV-7A) is FULLY insured with both HULL and LIABILITY! :-) I'm no DAR, but I don't believe they 'give a hoot' whether you have insurance or not. Jack Lockamy RV-7A N174JL 210 hrs. RV-10 lurker... thinking about it Camarillo, CA www.jacklockamy.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 17, 2006
From: <seanblair(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: G ratings
I just had the opportunity to take a terrific ride in an AT-6 Texan this last weekend. Complete with all the aerobatics I cared to enjoy. What a blast!!! We got the G reading to just under 4. The secret to a calm stomach.....half a Diet Dr. Pepper for breakfast on the way there. Just out of curiousity.....what are the positive and negative G ratings of the ten? I haven't seen these published anywhere. I know we won't do the aerobatic thing in our 10, but out of comparison to my recent experience I want to know. Thanks, Sean Blair #40225 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: New Andair Fuel Valve.
From: "zackrv8" <zackrv8(at)verizon.net>
Date: Aug 17, 2006
Guys, At Oshkosh, I ordered the new Andair valve (FS20X7) (http://www.andair.co.uk/system/index.html) for my RV10. When I got home, I read Tim Olson's site and the problems he had with clearance with the male AN fittings. So, I sent an email to Andy and told him of the clearance problem on the RV10 with that valve. I was expecting him to send me a valve with female ends on it so that I could put my own 90 degree el's on it. Instead, he sent me this. Check out the pics below. Zack -------- RV8 #80125 RV10 # 40512 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=55380#55380 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc05666_742.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc05665_474.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc05656_278.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc05659_993.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 17, 2006
From: Les Kearney <kearney(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: New to the list
Hi Len Many thanks for the very kind offer - I just may make my way out to Kelowna to see your project. I have made contact with NAIT to see if they have a programme that will work with my schedule. I would like to take a course in metal work as I have never done this before. I have also been toying with taking a SportAir course or perhaps even trying one of the builder assist centers for the empennage. I would guess that after 8-10 days of intense work, I should acquire most of the skills required to complete the airframe. Fiberglass will be another thing! Cheers Les Kearney Edmonton, Alberta (780) 707-0169 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of L Aune Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 11:40 AM Subject: RV10-List: New to the list Les I am a builder from Kelowna working on the doors at present. I am an AME-M and an AME-S teaching aircraft structures for BCIT. If you ever get out this way I'll give you a mini start-up course which will safely get you started on this great project. Drop by or call Len 250-766-5456. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich(at)cox.net>
Subject: New Andair Fuel Valve.
Date: Aug 17, 2006
What part number goes with this? Carl -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of zackrv8 Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 8:27 PM Subject: RV10-List: New Andair Fuel Valve. Guys, At Oshkosh, I ordered the new Andair valve (FS20X7) (http://www.andair.co.uk/system/index.html) for my RV10. When I got home, I read Tim Olson's site and the problems he had with clearance with the male AN fittings. So, I sent an email to Andy and told him of the clearance problem on the RV10 with that valve. I was expecting him to send me a valve with female ends on it so that I could put my own 90 degree el's on it. Instead, he sent me this. Check out the pics below. Zack -------- RV8 #80125 RV10 # 40512 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=55380#55380 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc05666_742.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc05665_474.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc05656_278.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc05659_993.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Neal George" <neal(at)appaero.com>
Subject: New Andair Fuel Valve.
Date: Aug 17, 2006
Carl - The complete part number for the valve pictured is FS20X7T FS = Fuel Selector 20 = line diameter in 1/2-mm increments (10mm is about 3/8" or AN6) X = Male AN6 outlet fitting. Female outlet would be "F" T = 90-deg elbow AN6 inlet fittings. Or "M" for male, "F" for female. Neal E. George 2023 Everglades Drive Navarre, FL 32566 Home - 850-515-0640 Cell - 850-218-4838 What part number goes with this? Carl ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: New Andair Fuel Valve.
Date: Aug 17, 2006
From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder(at)sausen.net>
Yep, that's the best one to use from Andair at the moment. It's more aesthetically pleasing with the "Y" configuration and much easier to get lines attached. Check out various entries @: <http://www.mykitlog.com/users/category.php?user=msausen&project=22&cate gory=1703> Michael Sausen -10 #352 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of zackrv8 Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 7:27 PM Subject: RV10-List: New Andair Fuel Valve. Guys, At Oshkosh, I ordered the new Andair valve (FS20X7) (http://www.andair.co.uk/system/index.html) for my RV10. When I got home, I read Tim Olson's site and the problems he had with clearance with the male AN fittings. So, I sent an email to Andy and told him of the clearance problem on the RV10 with that valve. I was expecting him to send me a valve with female ends on it so that I could put my own 90 degree el's on it. Instead, he sent me this. Check out the pics below. Zack -------- RV8 #80125 RV10 # 40512 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=55380#55380 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc05666_742.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc05665_474.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc05656_278.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc05659_993.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: New Andair Fuel Valve.
From: "zackrv8" <zackrv8(at)verizon.net>
Date: Aug 17, 2006
carl.froehlich(at)cox.net wrote: > What part number goes with this? > > Carl > > -- Carl, My invoice says Part No. FS20X7-T Zack -------- RV8 #80125 RV10 # 40512 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=55406#55406 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: MVP-50 Fuel Flow Transducer
From: "zackrv8" <zackrv8(at)verizon.net>
Date: Aug 17, 2006
If anyone is going to use the MVP-50 from Electronis Intl like I am, you might save yourself some time and NOT install the fuel-flow transducer bracket in the tunnel. EI does NOT use the FlowScan transducer. They use their own that they designed. They do not want it mounted "rigid." They want it mounted on a flex line just before the fuel goes into the divider. They told me they reason for that is that they want fuel "PUSHED" into the Transducer and not possibly "PULLED" by the engine fuel pump. Zack -------- RV8 #80125 RV10 # 40512 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=55408#55408 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: LED Bulbs
Date: Aug 16, 2006
From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder(at)sausen.net>
Here is another company with lots of options. http://autolumination.com/ Michael Sausen -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Byron Gillespie Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 5:36 PM Subject: RV10-List: Overhead Console - Lighting For some others that are utilizing the Chevrolet overhead console, I have found some decent LED lights that are a perfect retrofit. I wanted to ditch the factory white ones so began playing around fabricating some bulbs - they worked great but were time consuming to fabricate. I checked at my favorite store and found some options to investigate. I bought 4 Red LED bulbs for the map lights and a blue for the dome light. I bought several others to try out but these are the best I found. All look great. The seller on eBay that I used was "velocityled_1" there are likely others but he was super fast and very professional to deal with. They are set for 12V automotive application so are already set with resistors and diode for current protection. The power draw is 0.05A each - all 5 lights lit up .25A Eyeball - "VELOCITY LEDS SUPER RED HIGH POWER LED BULB 194 168 158" - 2 for 8.99+S&H Console - "SUPER BLUE HIGH POWER LED BULB 211-2 212-2 214-2" - 1 for 6.99 + S&H (can combine) Just another custom option. Byron - #40253 - N253RV assigned - more finishing, wiring, and firewall forward ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 17, 2006
From: jsmcgrew(at)aol.com
Subject: My Tunnel Heat Fix
Second try to post this message: On my first 3 flights the tunnel got very warm. You could still hold your hand on it (just barely) but it was hot in there. Additionally, the belly of the aircraft just aft of the cowling was HOT after the flight. Now that I've made some easy changes the tunnel is cool to lukewarm and there is no appreciable heat on the belly after flight. I've been flying in 80 to 90+ degree weather with the heater scat tubing connected. I heard about the tunnel heat problem a little late and I built only a few preemptive things into the plane. I put ceramic gaskets behind the heater valves to keep heat from transfering to the firewall/tunnel. I installed a blast tube on the firewall forward of the tunnel. And I installed a computer fan in the tunnel cover just over the fuel pump (this actually made a big difference in tunnel heat once I turned it on.) These things didn't fix the problem, but here's what did. I was having CHT and oil temp overheating problems and one of the things I did to fix this problem was increase the cowl air exit area to improve air flow. As you can see from the photo I enlarged one of the louvers and added an additional one - this didn't make much difference alone. Then I trimmed the aft edge of the "reverse scoop" forward about an inch (see photo). This increases the exit area, but I think it also allows the hot air to move down and away from the fuse and disipate faster. I'm sure that I added extra drag to my plane, but the engine and tunnel are now cool. Jim McGrew 40134 - flying [Image Removed] ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: LED Bulbs
Date: Aug 16, 2006
From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder(at)sausen.net>
Here is another company with lots of options. http://autolumination.com/ Michael Sausen -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Byron Gillespie Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 5:36 PM Subject: RV10-List: Overhead Console - Lighting For some others that are utilizing the Chevrolet overhead console, I have found some decent LED lights that are a perfect retrofit. I wanted to ditch the factory white ones so began playing around fabricating some bulbs - they worked great but were time consuming to fabricate. I checked at my favorite store and found some options to investigate. I bought 4 Red LED bulbs for the map lights and a blue for the dome light. I bought several others to try out but these are the best I found. All look great. The seller on eBay that I used was "velocityled_1" there are likely others but he was super fast and very professional to deal with. They are set for 12V automotive application so are already set with resistors and diode for current protection. The power draw is 0.05A each - all 5 lights lit up .25A Eyeball - "VELOCITY LEDS SUPER RED HIGH POWER LED BULB 194 168 158" - 2 for 8.99+S&H Console - "SUPER BLUE HIGH POWER LED BULB 211-2 212-2 214-2" - 1 for 6.99 + S&H (can combine) Just another custom option. Byron - #40253 - N253RV assigned - more finishing, wiring, and firewall forward ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Sipp" <rsipp(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: G ratings
Date: Aug 17, 2006
Hi Sean: It's on page 21 of the final inspection and flight test section of the builder's manual. As Tim posted +3.8 and -1.9 at a gross weight of 2700 lbs. There are a couple of paragraphs on G loading and testing. This section has lots of other good "stuff"; it may not come until you order the finish kit if you are not that far along. There is no discussion about "rolling Gs" so you have to assume these limits are for none rolling conditions only. Pulling near limiting G loads at the same time as a roll input can easily overstress the down aileron wing. Any of the aerobatic RVs will fly rings around an AT6, sure miss the RV4. Bananas are good for breakfast too..they taste the same coming up as going down. All the best. Dick Sipp 40065 finish kit ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Marcus Cooper" <coop85(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: My Tunnel Heat Fix
Date: Aug 18, 2006
Jim, Great fix and I'm glad it worked so well, may end up doing that myself. The really impressive thing is the nerve to make the changes since they would be tough to undo. That's the great thing about homebuilts, think of a fix and act on it. Not everyone would have the conviction to do it though - great job! Marcus _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of jsmcgrew(at)aol.com Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 3:59 PM Subject: RV10-List: My Tunnel Heat Fix Second try to post this message: On my first 3 flights the tunnel got very warm. You could still hold your hand on it (just barely) but it was hot in there. Additionally, the belly of the aircraft just aft of the cowling was HOT after the flight. Now that I've made some easy changes the tunnel is cool to lukewarm and there is no appreciable heat on the belly after flight. I've been flying in 80 to 90+ degree weather with the heater scat tubing connected. I heard about the tunnel heat problem a little late and I built only a few preemptive things into the plane. I put ceramic gaskets behind the heater valves to keep heat from transfering to the firewall/tunnel. I installed a blast tube on the firewall forward of the tunnel. And I installed a computer fan in the tunnel cover just over the fuel pump (this actually made a big difference in tunnel heat once I turned it on.) These things didn't fix the problem, but here's what did. I was having CHT and oil temp overheating problems and one of the things I did to fix this problem was increase the cowl air exit area to improve air flow. As you can see from the photo I enlarged one of the louvers and added an additional one - this didn't make much difference alone. Then I trimmed the aft edge of the "reverse scoop" forward about an inch (see photo). This increases the exit area, but I think it also allows the hot air to move down and away from the fuse and disipate faster. I'm sure that I added extra drag to my plane, but the engine and tunnel are now cool. Jim McGrew 40134 - flying _____ [Image Removed] ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net>
Subject: Re: Nose Wheel Valve Clearance Solution
Date: Aug 18, 2006
I just spoke with the people at Matco about returning my front wheel for exchange and they said, like a previous poster had said, they will take it back if it hadn't been mounted yet. The only difference from the last post is that there is a small fee for returning it. The fee is $18.30 plus you pay the shipping charges. If it's been mounted, like mine was but the plane had never been moved, they have to evaluate whether they can accept it back as new or if the have to repair it or not. I couldn't see a scratch on mine but I'll have to wait and see what they say. I told the lady, Carolyn, that others said there was no charge if they hadn't been mounted yet and she told me that she has set up the receiving on all of these exchanges and they all were or would be charged the standard fee. For what ever it's worth. Wayne Edgerton #40336 front wheel off and going back ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Nose Wheel Valve Clearance Solution
Date: Aug 18, 2006
From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder(at)sausen.net>
I'm already deleting a whole bunch of stuff from the finish kit and I think this will be another item. No sense in paying for it to be shipped to me, returned, and have another handling fee and shipping fee assessed. Sure would be nice if Van's would just start using the correct part. I'm sure Matco has brought this up with them. Michael Sausen -10 #352 ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Wayne Edgerton Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 4:22 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Nose Wheel Valve Clearance Solution I just spoke with the people at Matco about returning my front wheel for exchange and they said, like a previous poster had said, they will take it back if it hadn't been mounted yet. The only difference from the last post is that there is a small fee for returning it. The fee is $18.30 plus you pay the shipping charges. If it's been mounted, like mine was but the plane had never been moved, they have to evaluate whether they can accept it back as new or if the have to repair it or not. I couldn't see a scratch on mine but I'll have to wait and see what they say. I told the lady, Carolyn, that others said there was no charge if they hadn't been mounted yet and she told me that she has set up the receiving on all of these exchanges and they all were or would be charged the standard fee. For what ever it's worth. Wayne Edgerton #40336 front wheel off and going bac ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Nose Wheel Valve Clearance Solution
Date: Aug 18, 2006
Since I was one of the first to exchange I believe there was a slight difference in list price. My total exchange cost $27 including freight IIRC. ----- Original Message ----- From: Wayne Edgerton To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 2:22 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Nose Wheel Valve Clearance Solution I just spoke with the people at Matco about returning my front wheel for exchange and they said, like a previous poster had said, they will take it back if it hadn't been mounted yet. The only difference from the last post is that there is a small fee for returning it. The fee is $18.30 plus you pay the shipping charges. If it's been mounted, like mine was but the plane had never been moved, they have to evaluate whether they can accept it back as new or if the have to repair it or not. I couldn't see a scratch on mine but I'll have to wait and see what they say. I told the lady, Carolyn, that others said there was no charge if they hadn't been mounted yet and she told me that she has set up the receiving on all of these exchanges and they all were or would be charged the standard fee. For what ever it's worth. Wayne Edgerton #40336 front wheel off and going back ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 18, 2006
From: PJ Seipel <seipel(at)seznam.cz>
Subject: Re: Installation drawing/picture of TruTrak Auto Pitch Trim
Does anyone with the TruTrak Auto Pitch Trim have a picture of how the "Link Trim Sensor" gets installed? The installation manual says "Note: The link sensor replaces the existing push-rod between the pitch servo and the control system. This sensor is required for the system to function; it is part of the fail safe design of the system.", but I can't figure out how the heck I'm supposed to do that. The link sensor has a rod end bearing on one end...what do I do with the other end? I've emailed trutrak, but guess I need to call them as I can't seem to get a response. This is one case where a picture would be worth a thousand words. > > Thanks, > PJ > RV-10 #40032 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: HTS
From: "zackrv8" <zackrv8(at)verizon.net>
Date: Aug 18, 2006
Guys, Here's what I am doing for the HTS (Hot Tunnel Syndrome). I made two brackets that raise up off the bottom floor by 1 inch. They are simple U-brackets made from .050 2024. The existing cradle brackets are then riveted on and three holes on each flange are then riveted to the Tunnel side walls. I have a"KoolMat" insulation layer laying on the floor followed by 1 inch of closed cell foam I bought from Wicks. The fuel lines will be firesleeved when I finish making them. SO much easier working in the Tunnel without the side skins on! Zack -------- RV8 #80125 RV10 # 40512 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=55650#55650 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc05668_130.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc05670_402.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc05674_261.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc05675_183.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Oil Filter Adapter
From: "bcondrey" <bob.condrey(at)baesystems.com>
Date: Aug 19, 2006
The correct spacer for the B&C unit is 1.4". Bob #40104 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=55733#55733 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 19, 2006
From: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Oil Filter Adapter
Also, if you are going to use the 20 amp B&C back up alternator you will require an angled adapter for the back up alternator. Larry bcondrey wrote: > > The correct spacer for the B&C unit is 1.4". > > Bob #40104 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=55733#55733 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 19, 2006
Subject: [ Bobby Hargrave ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Bobby Hargrave Lists: RV-List,RV4-List,RV6-List,RV7-List,RV8-List,RV9-List,RV10-List Subject: Sticky Exhaust Valve http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/bphargrave@worldnet.att.net.1.08.19.2006/index.html ---------------------------------------------------------- o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ---------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chris" <toaster73(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Flight aware dot com
Date: Aug 19, 2006
I was fooling around with this website and found it interesting to see the type of plane Tim has actually been flying. Check it out. See what the aircraft type comes up for his plane on his last IFR trip. -Chris #40072 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Russell Daves" <dav1111(at)cox.net>
Subject: Pre-Oiler
Date: Aug 20, 2006
I am using the GP301-12 pre-oiler from Infinity Aerospace ($230.00 plus shipping). http://www.infinityaerospace.com/ I obtained the check valve from a local plumbing supply house (don't get the flapper type) and the hoses were made locally. I mounted the pre-oiler on the right side firewall down low and ran the inlet line from an extra sump plug and the outlet line up to the ECI 90 degree adapter drain plug 1/4" even with the reduced line flow the pre-oiler works great. Russ Daves N710RV (Phase II - In Paint Shop) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Dawson-Townsend" <Tdawson(at)avidyne.com> Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2006 4:42 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: A few new photos and items posted Russ: What pre-oiler are you using? TDT 40025 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: PILOTDDS(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 20, 2006
Subject: Re: N585MR Flies!
I also trimed the baffles on one and two.It helped quite a bit they still run a little hotter than I would like and I adjust climbout accordingly.I ordered a Sam James plenum and will report the results.When OAT"s are in the 90"s #1 will hit 425 at a climbout of 120kts.Also Alex De dominicis developed louvres which he reports lowers chts quite a bit. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Pre-Oiler
Date: Aug 20, 2006
From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder(at)sausen.net>
If you want to save yourself about $100 on these, look around online. These are common Reverso pumps. JD doesn't even change the part numbers other than dropping the "H" off the end for high volume. He just sells them at list price. One example is here: http://www.marine-electronics-unlimited.com/Reverso+Oil+Gear+Pumps.html Interestingly enough, they only have a temperature rating of 140F. Michael Sausen -10 #352 Fuselage -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Russell Daves Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 5:17 AM Subject: RV10-List: Pre-Oiler I am using the GP301-12 pre-oiler from Infinity Aerospace ($230.00 plus shipping). http://www.infinityaerospace.com/ I obtained the check valve from a local plumbing supply house (don't get the flapper type) and the hoses were made locally. I mounted the pre-oiler on the right side firewall down low and ran the inlet line from an extra sump plug and the outlet line up to the ECI 90 degree adapter drain plug 1/4" even with the reduced line flow the pre-oiler works great. Russ Daves N710RV (Phase II - In Paint Shop) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Dawson-Townsend" <Tdawson(at)avidyne.com> Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2006 4:42 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: A few new photos and items posted Russ: What pre-oiler are you using? TDT 40025 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Peter Franke" <pfranke(at)tpg.com.au>
Subject: First Flights Down Under
Date: Aug 21, 2006
I'll throw another one into the mix. VH-VIO built by Andre Viljoen in Canberra has been flying for several months now. Cheers, Peter F > VH-ZEG Chris Zeitz - First flew late June/Early July in South Australia. > VH-TXD Terry Doe in Western AUS > > VH-NVL Neville Boyle #40107 in Victoria (and I should have answered my > earlier question) sorry. > > VH-DRS Scott Lewis who was selling his tail kit in South AUS > > VH-VDM Douglas Montague in Peakhurst NSW, AUS which I believe is flying > > VH-ELU John Jogodnik flying in May, 2006 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net>
Subject: Skybolt adjustable cam locks
Date: Aug 21, 2006
Don't know if any of you have considered cam locks vs hinges for your cowling. Skybolt has adjustable camlocks for the RV10 and they have a RV10 kit. The non adjustable camlocks would be a problem because they would loosen and damage the cowling. With the adjustable one you can keep them tight by adjusting them as they loosen. If anyone is interested here is their web site. Look around until you find the RV section. I'm just now installing mine. We'll see how well it goes. http://www.skybolt.com/ Here is their blurb. VANS RV SERIES AND OTHER KIT PLANE INSTALLATION Skybolt has perfected the installation of CLoc=AE Fasteners in hundreds of Vans RV 4,6,7,8,9 and 10 and other kit planes. The Skybolt design adds functionality and appearance to any cowling. Hinge is the perfect design for a pop-rivet aircraft. Skybolt CLoc=AE is the perfect design for a true investment in pride. Wayne Edgerton #40336 working installing camlocks ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Ritter" <mritter509(at)msn.com>
Subject: Skybolt adjustable cam locks
Date: Aug 21, 2006
Wayne, I used the Skybolt camlocks around the fuselage and they work great. I went with the piano hinge to connect the upper and lower cowls along the horizontal axis. I used the piano hinge because there are no curves along the sides (pins easy to get in and out) and they makes for a "clean" look. Mark (N410MR flying) >From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: RV10-List: Skybolt adjustable cam locks >Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:32:21 -0500 > >Don't know if any of you have considered cam locks vs hinges for your >cowling. Skybolt has adjustable camlocks for the RV10 and they have a RV10 >kit. The non adjustable camlocks would be a problem because they would >loosen and damage the cowling. With the adjustable one you can keep them >tight by adjusting them as they loosen. > >If anyone is interested here is their web site. Look around until you find >the RV section. I'm just now installing mine. We'll see how well it goes. > >http://www.skybolt.com/ > >Here is their blurb. > >VANS RV SERIES AND OTHER KIT PLANE INSTALLATION >Skybolt has perfected the installation of CLoc Fasteners in hundreds of >Vans RV 4,6,7,8,9 and 10 and other kit planes. The Skybolt design adds >functionality and appearance to any cowling. Hinge is the perfect design >for a pop-rivet aircraft. Skybolt CLoc is the perfect design for a true >investment in pride. > > >Wayne Edgerton #40336 > >working installing camlocks ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Skybolt adjustable cam locks
From: "Jim & Julie Wade" <jwadejr(at)hughes.net>
Date: Aug 21, 2006
Mark I did the same thing!! Adjustable camlock next to the fuselage and hinge on the half separation. When I realized I was going to have to do a lot of reenforcing the upper and lover half for the camlocks, I decided to go with the hinge. Not a lot of room for the camlocks next to the valve covers .I bought the RV-10 kit from Skybolt and didn't use but half of it. You might just want to buy enough camlocks just to do the back half. Finished everything, waiting on panel this week!!!! Jim 40383 Slow build Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=56112#56112 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: almost ready!!!!!
From: "Jim & Julie Wade" <jwadejr(at)hughes.net>
Date: Aug 21, 2006
Panel arriving this week!! A few weeks, should be up!!!! and Flying!!! Jim & Julie Wade 40383 slow build Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=56115#56115 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/imgp0037_119.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 21, 2006
From: Sean Stephens <sean(at)stephensville.com>
Subject: Re: almost ready!!!!!
Jim & Julie Wade wrote: > > Panel arriving this week!! A few weeks, should be up!!!! and Flying!!! > > Jim & Julie Wade > 40383 > slow build > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=56115#56115 > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/imgp0037_119.jpg > That's a very nice looking paint job! -Sean #40303 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: almost ready!!!!!
From: "Jim & Julie Wade" <jwadejr(at)hughes.net>
Date: Aug 21, 2006
Yea Sean that has been one of the hardest jobs. Finally took everything to a friends body shop and used his paint booth. Did all the priming in my own homemade booth, Sanded, then took it to paint. We are very happy with the results. Jim Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=56164#56164 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Neil McLeod" <neilmcleod(at)hughes.net>
Subject: Re: Skybolt adjustable cam locks
Date: Aug 21, 2006
I used the Skybolt camlocs on my RV-7. As I see it the advantage besides adjusting for wear is adjusting for the thickness of the cowling. Being a hand laid up fiberglass piece it is not a consistant thickness and the adjustable camlocs make it easy to set up on the original installation. I'm happy with thim so far but only have about 30 hours on them so far. I have not installed the retainers for the outer part that locks into the airframe yet because I'm still tweaking things. Neil ----- Original Message ----- From: Wayne Edgerton To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 6:32 AM Subject: RV10-List: Skybolt adjustable cam locks Don't know if any of you have considered cam locks vs hinges for your cowling. Skybolt has adjustable camlocks for the RV10 and they have a RV10 kit. The non adjustable camlocks would be a problem because they would loosen and damage the cowling. With the adjustable one you can keep them tight by adjusting them as they loosen. If anyone is interested here is their web site. Look around until you find the RV section. I'm just now installing mine. We'll see how well it goes. http://www.skybolt.com/ Here is their blurb. VANS RV SERIES AND OTHER KIT PLANE INSTALLATION Skybolt has perfected the installation of CLoc=AE Fasteners in hundreds of Vans RV 4,6,7,8,9 and 10 and other kit planes. The Skybolt design adds functionality and appearance to any cowling. Hinge is the perfect design for a pop-rivet aircraft. Skybolt CLoc=AE is the perfect design for a true investment in pride. Wayne Edgerton #40336 working installing camlocks ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Douglas" <bsponcil(at)belinblank.org>
Subject: Re: almost ready!!!!!
Date: Aug 22, 2006
Wow the paint came out great! I'm really interested to hear your perspective on the Blue Mountain stuff once you get flying. Keep us posted. -Brian N211BD Iowa City, IA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim & Julie Wade" <jwadejr(at)hughes.net> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 12:36 PM Subject: RV10-List: almost ready!!!!! > > > Panel arriving this week!! A few weeks, should be up!!!! and Flying!!! > > Jim & Julie Wade > 40383 > slow build > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=56115#56115 > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/imgp0037_119.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Window overspray
Date: Aug 22, 2006
From: "Vern W. Smith" <Vern(at)teclabsinc.com>
Hi, A product I had recommended to me by an A&P was DuPont's PrepSol ("5 Star" brand has the similar product called Wax and Grease Remover.) It should be available in the local car paint shop in quarts and gallons. I used it on a Cessna to clean some overspray off and it worked well without harming the Plexiglas. I have not used it on Van's windows so if you go this way try it on a scrap first. Vern (#40324 wings) > -----Original Message----- > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Cooper > Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 6:39 PM > > > Some time ago there were some great responses on how to remove overspray > from the windows. At the time I was scoffing the idea and didn't save > what > would now be some extremely valuable information. Any reposting, or at > least the proper search words (no luck on my part), would be deeply > appreciated. > > Thanks, > Marcus > 40286 - engine running, dangerously close to inspection time! If I can > just > get all the Gucci panels programmed I'll be in business. > > > > > -- > > > -- > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Serious Front Axle Maintenance Issue on the RV-10
Date: Aug 22, 2006
From: "Vern W. Smith" <Vern(at)teclabsinc.com>
Hi All, I've lost the email, but someone asked about ship dates of finishing kits and if they had the aluminum or stainless spacers (part number U-1032.) I checked and my kit was packed on 2-6-06 and included the stainless steel spacers. Vern (#40324) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Albert Gardner" <ibspud(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Battery Cable Routing
Date: Aug 22, 2006
I'm running the wires and finding the battery cable a puzzle. How have others routed the cable once you reach the front spar? In the tunnel and forward, through the firewall to the starter contactor? I'm not even sure where to mount the starter contactor. Albert Gardner Yuma, AZ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Kraus" <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net>
Subject: Battery Cable Routing
Date: Aug 22, 2006
I ran mine down the left side of the plane, under the baggage floor in the back then through the side wall under the door. The starter contactor bolts to the firewall on the middle left side. -Mike -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Albert Gardner Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 6:52 PM Subject: RV10-List: Battery Cable Routing I'm running the wires and finding the battery cable a puzzle. How have others routed the cable once you reach the front spar? In the tunnel and forward, through the firewall to the starter contactor? I'm not even sure where to mount the starter contactor. Albert Gardner Yuma, AZ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 22, 2006
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Battery Cable Routing
Al, I'm in the midst of doing the same thing. I grounded my batteries (dual batteries, dual alt) locally (@ their mounting point. This was discussed on Aero Electric connection and got Bob Nuckols blessing) and ran a #2 welding cable forward on the left side (for starter)+ 2 10 AWG for main batt bus & Aux batt bus. Ran #4 cable forward on the left side for Main bus + 10 awg for Aux Bus. Deems Davis # 406 Fuse/Finishing/Panel http://deemsrv10.com/ Albert Gardner wrote: > > >I'm running the wires and finding the battery cable a puzzle. How have >others routed the cable once you reach the front spar? In the tunnel and >forward, through the firewall to the starter contactor? I'm not even sure >where to mount the starter contactor. >Albert Gardner >Yuma, AZ > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jdalton77" <jdalton77(at)comcast.net>
Subject: GM LS2 Engine - opinions
Date: Aug 22, 2006
I'm a long way from engine selection, but I've been hearing a lot of good commentary on the GM LS2 engine (used in the 2005 Corvette). The ones I have seen on aircraft have been derated to a maximum of 4500 RPM (redline is over 6500 RPM) limiting the HP to 300HP. The engine new is less than $6k. Of course, all the mods will add up to closer to $20k altogether. Opinions? ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Serious Front Axle Maintenance Issue on the RV-10
From: "bcondrey" <bob.condrey(at)baesystems.com>
Date: Aug 22, 2006
I just received my new wheel from Matco today and already had the spacers so it was swap time. After reassembly and torque to standard value (160-190 in lbs) I was dismayed to see the spacers turning with the wheel. Only way this can happen is that the axle is slighly longer than the wheel/bearing/spacer assembly. I'm going to call Van's tomorrow to see what they recommend before shaving a bit off the axle or doing another mod like set screws through the fork, etc. Seems like with some preload they wouldn't be able to turn at all... Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=56548#56548 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Battery Cable Routing
Date: Aug 22, 2006
Why not run the battery to buss wire from the hot side of the starter relay to the primary buss.(less weight and wire) also hook the batteries in parallel so that either or both may be used to start. The grounding wires for the master switches need be only #20 to the hot side of the master contactor for each battery. Remember to put the diodes on the relays to protect the contactors. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Deems Davis" <deemsdavis(at)cox.net> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 6:21 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Battery Cable Routing > > Al, I'm in the midst of doing the same thing. I grounded my batteries > (dual batteries, dual alt) locally (@ their mounting point. This was > discussed on Aero Electric connection and got Bob Nuckols blessing) and > ran a #2 welding cable forward on the left side (for starter)+ 2 10 AWG > for main batt bus & Aux batt bus. Ran #4 cable forward on the left side > for Main bus + 10 awg for Aux Bus. > > Deems Davis # 406 > Fuse/Finishing/Panel > http://deemsrv10.com/ > > > Albert Gardner wrote: > >> >> >>I'm running the wires and finding the battery cable a puzzle. How have >>others routed the cable once you reach the front spar? In the tunnel and >>forward, through the firewall to the starter contactor? I'm not even sure >>where to mount the starter contactor. >>Albert Gardner >>Yuma, AZ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "KiloPapa" <kilopapa(at)antelecom.net>
Subject: Re: Window overspray
Date: Aug 22, 2006
Read the reply from John Cox in this thread before you use any solvents: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?t=5024 Kevin 40494 tail/empennage ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vern W. Smith" <Vern(at)teclabsinc.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 2:53 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Window overspray > > Hi, > > A product I had recommended to me by an A&P was DuPont's PrepSol ("5 > Star" brand has the similar product called Wax and Grease Remover.) It > should be available in the local car paint shop in quarts and gallons. I > used it on a Cessna to clean some overspray off and it worked well > without harming the Plexiglas. I have not used it on Van's windows so if > you go this way try it on a scrap first. > > Vern (#40324 wings) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 23, 2006
From: Larry R <_lr_@yahoo.com>
Subject: Build times - time to get restarted?
I was one of the first to buy a tail kit (#22), but life intruded and after some initial progress the kid has been untouched for the last 2 years. I'm now getting the itch to get hack into the project, but I'm wonder if I've bit off more than I can chew. I'd be interested in hearing from anyone who has completed, or nearly completed a Quick-Build RV-10, regard times to completion for each of the sub-kits (empecone, wings, etc). Did you try to optimize for lowest cost of fastest build time? What major obstacles did you hit? What words of advice/encouragement would you offer? Its getting depressing to see the tail parts hanging there every time I pull into the garage. Its time for me to either get my you-know-what in gear or admit to myself that this isn't going to happen and sell the tail kit. Replies directly to this email _lr_@yahoo.com are welcome. Thanks in advance, Larry Rachman ISP __________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Erickson" <john.erickson(at)cox.net>
Subject: Build times - time to get restarted?
Date: Aug 23, 2006
Larry, I've got kit #40208 and have also been getting discouraged now and then as I see guys with slowbuild numbers well after mine flying already. I'm military, have a couple kids, and while my building hasn't stopped (other than during a couple deployments), let's just say the wing flaps have taken me over 9 months so far, and not because the flaps are difficult. That being said, when I first started building a couple years ago, I set a goal of flying in 2 - 3 years. Obviously not going to happen. I changed my goal a year or so ago. I enjoy building. A lot. However, when I try to put a deadline on the project, it seems to turn from a fun project to a job. I've decided I'm going to work on it at whatever pace is enjoyable, and it will fly when it flies. (or as someone on the list said, I'll fly it when I run out of parts.) My recommendation. Get the tools out and get your shop set back up. Don't try to power through building your plane (besides, we're not building airplanes, we're building hundreds of small projects that end up flying in close formation). Spend 5 minutes out in the garage doing a little bit. Spend 4 hours if it feels good (and the family lets you). Just go out there a couple times a week and say hi to the project. Eventually it will be done. Don't worry about times for subcomponents or total build because then you WILL get depressed when, like me, you find it takes longer to build part X than Joe Bagodonuts took to do the same thing. Just my $0.02 worth... John #40208 Wings (still) -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Larry R Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 6:13 AM Subject: RV10-List: Build times - time to get restarted? I was one of the first to buy a tail kit (#22), but life intruded and after some initial progress the kid has been untouched for the last 2 years. I'm now getting the itch to get hack into the project, but I'm wonder if I've bit off more than I can chew. I'd be interested in hearing from anyone who has completed, or nearly completed a Quick-Build RV-10, regard times to completion for each of the sub-kits (empecone, wings, etc). Did you try to optimize for lowest cost of fastest build time? What major obstacles did you hit? What words of advice/encouragement would you offer? Its getting depressing to see the tail parts hanging there every time I pull into the garage. Its time for me to either get my you-know-what in gear or admit to myself that this isn't going to happen and sell the tail kit. Replies directly to this email _lr_@yahoo.com are welcome. Thanks in advance, Larry Rachman ISP __________________________________________________ __________ NOD32 1.1721 (20060823) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Serious Front Axle Maintenance Issue on the RV-10
From: "bcondrey" <bob.condrey(at)baesystems.com>
Date: Aug 23, 2006
I just talked w/Tom at Van's and his suggestion is to check spacing with a feeler gauge and adjust the axle accordingly. He also said that behavior would be possibly be very different with the wheel off the ground than with full weight on it. I guess I'll be measuring and adjusting the front axle length tonight... On related note - what's the best way to jack up the plane for nose wheel work? I've been using my engine hoist but assume there's another option for "in the field" work. Bob Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=56657#56657 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Ritter" <mritter509(at)msn.com>
Subject: Build times - time to get restarted?
Date: Aug 23, 2006
Larry, I purchased tail kit #43 November 1, 2003 (QB Fuse and wings). The plane was inspected on July 21 and I flew it on July 22, 2006. I worked on the project two or three days most weeks and didn't let it consume all my free time. Saving time for the grandchildren, fishing and a little time at the office around pay day was just as important as finishing the plane. I wanted to keep the project "fun". Some days you just have to say the hell with it and go do something else. Early on I decided not to keep track of my time or cost. It was going to take what it took and I sure didn't want to set any deadlines. I get enough of that stuff at my CPA office. In my case it seemed to be more fun when I could enlist the help of friends and enjoy a cold one at the end of a day bucking rivets. Most of my friends will work for beer. The plane is great and performs as advertised but I really enjoyed the building. Learning new skills and the sense of accomplishment is what it was all about for me. Mark >From: Larry R <_lr_@yahoo.com> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV10-List: Build times - time to get restarted? >Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:13:28 -0700 (PDT) > > >I was one of the first to buy a tail kit (#22), but life intruded and >after some initial progress the kid has been untouched for the last 2 >years. I'm now getting the itch to get hack into the project, but I'm >wonder if I've bit off more than I can chew. > >I'd be interested in hearing from anyone who has completed, or nearly >completed a Quick-Build RV-10, regard times to completion for each of >the sub-kits (empecone, wings, etc). Did you try to optimize for lowest >cost of fastest build time? What major obstacles did you hit? What >words of advice/encouragement would you offer? > >Its getting depressing to see the tail parts hanging there every time I >pull into the garage. Its time for me to either get my you-know-what in >gear or admit to myself that this isn't going to happen and sell the >tail kit. > >Replies directly to this email _lr_@yahoo.com are welcome. > >Thanks in advance, > >Larry Rachman >ISP > > >__________________________________________________ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Albert Gardner" <ibspud(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Battery Cable Routing
Date: Aug 23, 2006
Unless one runs the battery cable in the tunnel, it looks like there is no place to hide it between the front spar and the firewall. Does anyone have a picture of what their method of attaching the cable in this area looks like? Albert Gardner Yuma, AZ 40-422 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 23, 2006
From: Rick <ricksked(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Battery Cable Routing
Speaking of diodes for contactors, I know I read about protecting trim relays from the same, besides a solid state solution, I've already built the relay terminal boards, does anyone have a recommendation for diode rectifiers for trim relays? 1 amp, 50 v (can you oversize the amps?) is my guess and my plan unless anyone has different ideas. I know I could have purchased the trim relay decks from a vendor but these were fun to assemble and I saved $3.00. :) I've heard that you don't need them as well but that goes against all my info I have found to date Rick S. 40185 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Build times - time to get restarted?
From: "Jim & Julie Wade" <jwadejr(at)hughes.net>
Date: Aug 23, 2006
I work heat better that cold!!!! Big hanger can't heat well. I have a big water fan!!!! You know with the water trickling down the back grates. Drops the temp 15 degrees up to 30 feet in front of it. I have worked all summer in 100+ temps with no problem!!!! Back to the kit!! How do you eat an elephant????? One bite at a time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I to went through depressed times. Everyone will!!!!! Jim 383 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=56714#56714 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Battery Cable Routing
Date: Aug 23, 2006
From: "Condrey, Bob (US SSA)" <bob.condrey(at)baesystems.com>
Albert, Typical routing from the tailcone is under the baggage floor panels (and along the right side baggage wall behind the panel) and then along the side walls in the cabin area. The side walls have interior panels that screw on all the way to the F-1024 bulkheads. The instrument panel is actually aft of the F-1002 bulkheads so there's only a short span where they are exposed. If you purchase the electrical kit from Van's they provide you with a panel that screws onto the longeron in this area to cover wiring. For the tunnel area the wiring kit shows the wiring for the fuel flow and pump running aft and then over to the side using routing similar to the brake and fuel lines. Flap motor wiring runs aft to the flap torque tube area and then to the side. Alternatively, Flightline Interiors' kit provides finished side panels all the way to the F-1002 bulkheads. http://my.execpc.com/~erdmannb/rv10.html This may be true of other providers as well, but wouldn't be difficult to make. I've attached a couple of manual pages for reference in case there's a specific area in question. Bob #40105 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Albert Gardner Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 11:54 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Battery Cable Routing Unless one runs the battery cable in the tunnel, it looks like there is no place to hide it between the front spar and the firewall. Does anyone have a picture of what their method of attaching the cable in this area looks like? Albert Gardner Yuma, AZ 40-422 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Build times - time to get restarted?
Date: Aug 23, 2006
From: "Condrey, Bob (US SSA)" <bob.condrey(at)baesystems.com>
I have had numerous interruptions of weeks at a time due to work related travel. Frequently it's hard to get restarted but picking a specific task to work makes getting your arms around it a lot easier. I have done my plane using slow build versions of the kits. I was too optimistic for timing on both the wing and fuselage kits - they sat around for weeks/months before I completed the preceding kit and was ready to move on. One thing that is HUGE motivation is a ride in a friends' RV - check out your local EAA chapter and I'm sure you'll find somebody willing to take you up. Bob #40105 Back to engine baffling after a few week break for OSH and work travel... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 23, 2006
From: Sean Stephens <sean(at)stephensville.com>
Subject: OT: IFR Training With Six-Pack or G1000?
Soliciting a few opinions from list members... I recently completed my BFR after a long time off flying. I had the fortunate opportunity to get a G1000 signoff (school requires 3 hours training to rent a G1000 equipped plane) at the same time. I really enjoyed flying behind the G1000 in a 2006 air conditioned 172SP. :) It was my first EFIS experience. While I am in buildus interuptus mode I am planning on getting my IFR ticket. My question to the list is should I go through this with the G1000 or the standard six-pack? The flight sim which the school uses has the standard six-pack. And the King DVDs are geared around that also. But, I can also get the King G1000 DVDs to fill in the gaps. Has anyone on the list gone through their IFR training with a G1000 that can offer up advice? How does the checkride differ as far as the Examiner is concerned? Is it easier to just complete the IFR training with the six-pack, and then go through the procedures afterward with the G1000? One of the reasons I'd like to do it via the G1000 is because the G1000 planes available for rental have air conditioning also, which is a nice feature here in Phoenix, AZ. :) One thing that I realize is that I'm fortunate to have a G1000 plane available as I'm planning on having a glass panel in my -10. I imagine that time behind a G1000 will help me either way if I go with a Chelton for example. Thanks, -Sean #40303 (plane in IL, me in AZ) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Roger Standley" <taildragon(at)msn.com>
Subject: Jacks (Was Serious Front Axle...)
Date: Aug 23, 2006
Bob, At the hangar, I use a scissors jack. It compresses to less than 4 inches and will slip under the nose gear. I made a couple split pipe "jack heads" with a pin on the bottom for the main gear. Drilled a hole in the plate on top of the scissors jack for the jack head pin. This is simple and works great when pants and main fairings are removed. The scissors jack weights a lot so looking for a lighter weight solution to carry in the plane. What have others done? Roger 40291 ----- Original Message ----- From: bcondrey<mailto:bob.condrey(at)baesystems.com> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 7:43 AM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Serious Front Axle Maintenance Issue on the RV-10 > I just talked w/Tom at Van's and his suggestion is to check spacing with a feeler gauge and adjust the axle accordingly. He also said that behavior would be possibly be very different with the wheel off the ground than with full weight on it. I guess I'll be measuring and adjusting the front axle length tonight... On related note - what's the best way to jack up the plane for nose wheel work? I've been using my engine hoist but assume there's another option for "in the field" work. Bob Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=56657#56657 atronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=56657#56657> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List igator?RV10-List> http://www.matronics.com/contribution on> ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: OT: IFR Training With Six-Pack or G1000?
Date: Aug 23, 2006
From: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR(at)wernerco.com>
Sean I had the same questions when I started to get my IFR cert. I talked long and hard with several instructors, and while they all told me the same thing, the glass panel, GPS moving map, EFIS, and HITS that I will have in the RV10 will make it as easy as possible to fly IFR, but I still need to be able to fly the needles, in case I am in someone else's plane, or I chose to sell the 10 and do something else. They told me it is very easy to transition from standard gauges to glass, but very difficult to transition from glass back to standard, if you never learned it that way. So long story short, I do not think glass or GPS is going away, I made the decision to learn the harder way and transition to glass when the 10 was done. Besides, I bought a cheap Cherokee 140 to get my ticket in and will sell it to get my engine when I am done. Rather than renting a high end plane, buy a cheap, traditional IFR trainer, get your ticket, sell it, and with the money you save you can put air in the 10. Just my .02 Dan RV10E (N289DT) -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Sean Stephens Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 5:25 PM Subject: RV10-List: OT: IFR Training With Six-Pack or G1000? Soliciting a few opinions from list members... I recently completed my BFR after a long time off flying. I had the fortunate opportunity to get a G1000 signoff (school requires 3 hours training to rent a G1000 equipped plane) at the same time. I really enjoyed flying behind the G1000 in a 2006 air conditioned 172SP. :) It was my first EFIS experience. While I am in buildus interuptus mode I am planning on getting my IFR ticket. My question to the list is should I go through this with the G1000 or the standard six-pack? The flight sim which the school uses has the standard six-pack. And the King DVDs are geared around that also. But, I can also get the King G1000 DVDs to fill in the gaps. Has anyone on the list gone through their IFR training with a G1000 that can offer up advice? How does the checkride differ as far as the Examiner is concerned? Is it easier to just complete the IFR training with the six-pack, and then go through the procedures afterward with the G1000? One of the reasons I'd like to do it via the G1000 is because the G1000 planes available for rental have air conditioning also, which is a nice feature here in Phoenix, AZ. :) One thing that I realize is that I'm fortunate to have a G1000 plane available as I'm planning on having a glass panel in my -10. I imagine that time behind a G1000 will help me either way if I go with a Chelton for example. Thanks, -Sean #40303 (plane in IL, me in AZ) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 23, 2006
From: "Jack Lockamy" <jacklockamy(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Can and RV-10 be insured for two-seats only?
I would love to build an RV-10 but the recent post of insurance costing approx. $3800 a year for full coverage gave me reason to sit back and pause..... I'm currently paying approx. $1400 p/year for the RV-7A with full coverage. Like most, I am sure I would only fly with more than one-passenger rarely (if at all...). I like the RV-10 for it's cross-country capability and larger cabin. Therefore, for my type of flying (95% cross-country solo and/or maybe one passenger...), can an RV-10 be insured for two seats only? If so, what kind of rates have been quoted with a $100-125K hull value and the normal $1 million dollar liability policy? My girlfriend would like to be able to take three suitcases full of shoes so we really don't have space for passengers! :-) Jack Lockamy Camarillo, CA RV-7A N174JL 220 hrs. www.jacklockamy.com jacklockamy(at)verizon.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 23, 2006
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: OT: IFR Training With Six-Pack or G1000?
Tim Dawson-Townsend wrote: > a.) Training on a G1000 or Avidyne Entegra would include "partial panel" work using the conventional "steam gauge" backup instruments. Yep, but not likely to the same level of competence, because it will be using a totally different set of instruments than what they fly every day, requiring much bigger adjustment. > b.) Using a G1000 or Avidyne Entegra, etc, does not mean radio navigation is abandoned for GPS. Both systems feature VOR, LOC, and ILS capability, in addition to RNAV (GPS). Yes, but no NDB. ;-) Also, minimal use of unaided radio navigation...how well do they track without a moving map? > c.) In a parallel vein, training or lots of practice in effectively using your autopilot of choice in conjunction with whatever system of six-pack/EFIS/GPS/Nav you have is also important . . . Traditional training planes are not too likely to have working autopilots, especially the Cessnas of the late '70s. Better to learn to handle it all hand flying before you let Otto do it all. > d). Like it or not, there are folks entering the training stream that are never going to fly without glass (except maybe VFR). Also true, and they will have some hard lessons before the kinks are ironed out. Has happened with every advance in technology. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: EFDsteve(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 24, 2006
Subject: Re: GM LS2 Engine - opinions
I agree in concept that the LS2 engine might make a good airplane engine, but in talking to someone who did some extensive research on this topic, when fitted with the PSRU, the weight and balance become unworkable on the RV-10. I haven't seen the numbers, though. If you find a way to make this conversion work, please let us know! Steve Weinstock 40230 In a message dated 8/22/2006 9:16:26 P.M. Central Standard Time, jdalton77(at)comcast.net writes: I'm a long way from engine selection, but I've been hearing a lot of good commentary on the GM LS2 engine (used in the 2005 Corvette). The ones I have seen on aircraft have been derated to a maximum of 4500 RPM (redline is over 6500 RPM) limiting the HP to 300HP. The engine new is less than $6k. Of course, all the mods will add up to closer to $20k altogether. Opinions? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ddddsp1(at)juno.com" <ddddsp1(at)juno.com>
Date: Aug 24, 2006
Subject: Manifold pressure hole
I went to drill the hole in the firewall for the manifold pressure fitti ng............it says to drill a 3/8" hole. The fitting does NOT go thr ough the hole because it is too small. What am I not doing right? It a ppears to me the hole needs to be drilled to 7/16" for the fitting to go through. Is it a typo in the manual? Thanks, DEAN 40449 ________________________________________________________________________

I went to drill the hole in the firewall for the manifold press ure fitting............it says to drill a 3/8" hole.  The fitting d oes NOT go through the hole because it is too small.  What am I not doing right?  It appears to me the hole needs to be drilled to 7/1 6" for the fitting to go through.  Is it a typo in the manual?

Thanks,

DEAN

40449



______________________ __________________________________________________
Visit
http://www.juno.com/value to sign up today!

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net>
Subject: Re: Serious Front Axle Maintenance Issue on the RV-10
Date: Aug 24, 2006
Hi Bob - I saw this lift type thing the other day that might do the trick. http://www.rvtraining.com/html/handy_jack.html Wayne Edgerton #40336 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 24, 2006
From: "James K Hovis" <james.k.hovis(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Jacks (Was Serious Front Axle...)
How we use to do it was with a 55 gal. drum that was cut about 2 ft from the bottom and filled with concrete. A square steel tube was embedded in the concrete with the top cut into a clevis and a 3/8" hole drilled through with a pin of the same size. Whole thing was on a wheeled dolly. The clevis was set about three feet or so off the floor. To jack the front of a plane, wheel the contraption under the tail, push the tail down so the tie-down ring would be in the in the clevis, insert the pin. As long as the contraption weighed enough, the nose wheel would be held off the floor and you could still move it around the shop... JKH On 8/23/06, Roger Standley wrote: > > > Bob, > > At the hangar, I use a scissors jack. It compresses to less than 4 inches > and will slip under the nose gear. I made a couple split pipe "jack heads" > with a pin on the bottom for the main gear. Drilled a hole in the plate on > top of the scissors jack for the jack head pin. This is simple and works > great when pants and main fairings are removed. The scissors jack weights a > lot so looking for a lighter weight solution to carry in the plane. What > have others done? > > Roger > 40291 > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* bcondrey > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 23, 2006 7:43 AM > *Subject:* RV10-List: Re: Serious Front Axle Maintenance Issue on the > RV-10 > > > I just talked w/Tom at Van's and his suggestion is to check spacing with a > feeler gauge and adjust the axle accordingly. He also said that behavior > would be possibly be very different with the wheel off the ground than with > full weight on it. > > I guess I'll be measuring and adjusting the front axle length tonight... > > On related note - what's the best way to jack up the plane for nose wheel > work? I've been using my engine hoist but assume there's another option for > "in the field" work. > > Bob > > > Read this topic online here: > > > * > > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 24, 2006
From: "James K Hovis" <james.k.hovis(at)gmail.com>
Subject: So Cal Builders
To any So Cal Builders: ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 24, 2006
From: "James K Hovis" <james.k.hovis(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: So Cal Builders
Sorry about that, fat fingers hit the wrong button before I was done. See below: On 8/24/06, James K Hovis wrote: > > To any So Cal Builders: > > Is there anyone on this list building in the Garden Grove or Cypress CA areas? I'm on temporary assignment here until next Friday and would love to look at a project underway. Please let me know. James Hovis. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jdalton77" <jdalton77(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: GM LS2 Engine - opinions
Date: Aug 24, 2006
It's about 50lbs more than the IO-540 once you load the coolant. Of course, that includes air conditioning. It's smaller than 540 also. We would need to load two batteries pretty far back to account for the difference in CG. ----- Original Message ----- From: EFDsteve(at)aol.com To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 12:51 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: GM LS2 Engine - opinions I agree in concept that the LS2 engine might make a good airplane engine, but in talking to someone who did some extensive research on this topic, when fitted with the PSRU, the weight and balance become unworkable on the RV-10. I haven't seen the numbers, though. If you find a way to make this conversion work, please let us know! Steve Weinstock 40230 In a message dated 8/22/2006 9:16:26 P.M. Central Standard Time, jdalton77(at)comcast.net writes: I'm a long way from engine selection, but I've been hearing a lot of good commentary on the GM LS2 engine (used in the 2005 Corvette). The ones I have seen on aircraft have been derated to a maximum of 4500 RPM (redline is over 6500 RPM) limiting the HP to 300HP. The engine new is less than $6k. Of course, all the mods will add up to closer to $20k altogether. Opinions? ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: So Cal Builders
Date: Aug 24, 2006
From: "Chris Johnston" <CJohnston(at)popsound.com>
I'm in LA about 10 minutes north of LAX. A bit of a trek from garden grove, but I'd be happy to get together and talk RVs. cj #40410 fuse www.perfectlygoodairplane.net -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of James K Hovis Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 9:36 AM Subject: RV10-List: Re: So Cal Builders Sorry about that, fat fingers hit the wrong button before I was done. See below: On 8/24/06, James K Hovis wrote: To any So Cal Builders: Is there anyone on this list building in the Garden Grove or Cypress CA areas? I'm on temporary assignment here until next Friday and would love to look at a project underway. Please let me know. James Hovis. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net>
Subject: Servicing air in the tires
Date: Aug 24, 2006
Has anyone come up with a way to put air into the tires without removing the fairings? Wayne Edgerton #40336 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: panel access
Date: Aug 24, 2006
Has anyone cut access panels into the glareshield to provide access to the rear for easy access to connect/disconnect instruments. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Ritter" <mritter509(at)msn.com>
Subject: Servicing air in the tires
Date: Aug 24, 2006
Wayne cut a round hole in the fairing where the valve is. Mark the tire so you know when the hole is lined up with the valve. Wal Mart has some round disk you can use to cover the hole or Aircraft Spruce has a Camloc Access Door p/n KM713-16-064 for $25. Air Craft Extras sells a valve extension I may try www.aircraftextras.com. You might also want to try the Michelin AIRSTOP tubes. I hear they lose very little air. Mark >From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: RV10-List: Servicing air in the tires >Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:36:29 -0500 > >Has anyone come up with a way to put air into the tires without removing >the fairings? > >Wayne Edgerton #40336 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Lauritsen - Work" <mike(at)cleavelandtool.com>
Subject: Servicing air in the tires
Date: Aug 24, 2006
We have been selling them for 15 years now... http://cleavelandtoolstore.com/prodinfo.asp?number=VSE5 $11 plus shipping for the extension and three covers. Mike Lauritsen Cleaveland Aircraft Tool 2225 First St. Boone, Iowa 50036 515-432-6794 mike(at)cleavelandtool.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mark Ritter Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 4:42 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Servicing air in the tires Wayne cut a round hole in the fairing where the valve is. Mark the tire so you know when the hole is lined up with the valve. Wal Mart has some round disk you can use to cover the hole or Aircraft Spruce has a Camloc Access Door p/n KM713-16-064 for $25. Air Craft Extras sells a valve extension I may try www.aircraftextras.com. You might also want to try the Michelin AIRSTOP tubes. I hear they lose very little air. Mark >From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: RV10-List: Servicing air in the tires >Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:36:29 -0500 > >Has anyone come up with a way to put air into the tires without removing >the fairings? > >Wayne Edgerton #40336 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Roger Standley" <taildragon(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Servicing air in the tires
Date: Aug 24, 2006
Gave this some thought and decided I could add an access later. Basic objection is that if you pump up a flat tire and go fly, how do you know it will have air when you land? Probably better to replace the tire/tube. ----- Original Message ----- From: Mike Lauritsen - Work<mailto:mike(at)cleavelandtool.com> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 2:58 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Servicing air in the tires > We have been selling them for 15 years now... http://cleavelandtoolstore.com/prodinfo.asp?number=VSE5 ndtoolstore.com/prodinfo.asp?number=VSE5> $11 plus shipping for the extension and three covers. Mike Lauritsen Cleaveland Aircraft Tool 2225 First St. Boone, Iowa 50036 515-432-6794 mike(at)cleavelandtool.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mark Ritter Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 4:42 PM To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RE: RV10-List: Servicing air in the tires > Wayne cut a round hole in the fairing where the valve is. Mark the tire so you know when the hole is lined up with the valve. Wal Mart has some round disk you can use to cover the hole or Aircraft Spruce has a Camloc Access Door p/n KM713-16-064 for $25. Air Craft Extras sells a valve extension I may try www.aircraftextras.com<http://www.aircraftextras.com/>. You might also want to try the Michelin AIRSTOP tubes. I hear they lose very little air. Mark >From: "Wayne Edgerton" > >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: > >Subject: RV10-List: Servicing air in the tires >Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:36:29 -0500 > >Has anyone come up with a way to put air into the tires without removing >the fairings? > >Wayne Edgerton #40336 http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List igator?RV10-List> http://www.matronics.com/contribution on> ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Roger Standley" <taildragon(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: panel access
Date: Aug 24, 2006
David, I considered doing this but decided to cut the panel into three sections instead. This worked well for my simple VFR panel layout. Center section should not have to be removed. Side sections give plenty of access. Roger #40291 ----- Original Message ----- From: David McNeill<mailto:dlm46007(at)cox.net> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 1:31 PM Subject: RV10-List: panel access Has anyone cut access panels into the glareshield to provide access to the rear for easy access to connect/disconnect instruments.
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List igator?RV10-List> http://www.matronics.com/contribution on> ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: panel access
Date: Aug 24, 2006
I spoke with Van's today and they see no problem creating access panels. I plan to create two 3" by 8" slots about 3.5" aft of the panel ; they will each start about 2" either side of the center post. Van's suggested avoiding overkill on the doublers. match the thickness of the forward deck with the doubler. They suggested #6 screws but I will use #8s and nutplates. I will be necessary to use cap screws with internal hex head so that an Allen wrench can install and remove. I will install my defroster fan just forward of the left slot with some .625" standoffs ; I believe this will provide adequate air circulation to keep condensation at a minimum in rainy humid conditions. ----- Original Message ----- From: Roger Standley To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 5:57 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: panel access David, I considered doing this but decided to cut the panel into three sections instead. This worked well for my simple VFR panel layout. Center section should not have to be removed. Side sections give plenty of access. Roger #40291 ----- Original Message ----- From: David McNeill To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 1:31 PM Subject: RV10-List: panel access Has anyone cut access panels into the glareshield to provide access to the rear for easy access to connect/disconnect instruments. s.com/Navigator?RV10-List ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 24, 2006
Subject: Re: So Cal Builders
From: "Niko Napoli" <nikonapoli(at)comcast.net>
Actually I am going to be at El Segundo on business for a week starting today. Would love to get together with local builders. You can contact me at the number below. Niko 772 708-9080 -----Original Message----- From: "Chris Johnston" <CJohnston(at)popsound.com> Sent: 8/24/06 1:10:56 PM To: Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: So Cal Builders I'm in LA about 10 minutes north of LAX. A bit of a trek from garden grove, but I'd be happy to get together and talk RVs. cj #40410 fuse www.perfectlygoodairplane.net -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of James K Hovis Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 9:36 AM To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RV10-List: Re: So Cal Builders Sorry about that, fat fingers hit the wrong button before I was done. See below: On 8/24/06, James K Hovis wrote: To any So Cal Builders: Is there anyone on this list building in the Garden Grove or Cypress CA areas? I'm on temporary assignment here until next Friday and would love to look at a project underway. Please let me know. James Hovis. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Can and RV-10 be insured for two-seats only?
From: "ScottA" <s-aldrich(at)comcast.net>
Date: Aug 24, 2006
>From my experience just this week it makes no difference how you register the aircraft with the FAA, they will go by how many seats it "could" have. I have a Murphy Moose and they published on their website once that it could be a 4/6 seater. The insurance saw this and will only quote on it being a 6 seat aircraft now - complete PITA. FWIW Scott Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=57184#57184 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net>
Subject: Re: Servicing air in the tires
Date: Aug 25, 2006
Roger What do you do if your just a little low on air? Wayne Edgerton #40336 do no archive ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Roger Standley" <taildragon(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Servicing air in the tires
Date: Aug 25, 2006
Wayne, Why am I a little low on air? Roger ----- Original Message ----- From: Wayne Edgerton<mailto:wayne.e(at)grandecom.net> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 4:13 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Servicing air in the tires Roger What do you do if your just a little low on air? Wayne Edgerton #40336 do no archive http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List igator?RV10-List> http://www.matronics.com/contribution on> ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 25, 2006
From: Link McGarity <callsign(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Tire Pressure Loss
Aircraft tires, especially small ones, will lose air pressure due to a number of reasons, most of which do not warrant a tube/tire change. Have holes in my RV-6 wheel pants with pop out plugs for 2-3 years now. Just take a hole saw, support from back side, and cut. May have to dress up rim/edge of hole for durability. LM, RV-6/N42GF/FD38 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 25, 2006
From: "bruce breckenridge" <bbreckenridge(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Van's Homecoming
Any "homecomers"? Looks like decent weather out here on the west coast for Van's Homecoming. Bruce 40018 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 25, 2006
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Forest of Tabs
Where have people mounted their forest of grounding tabs? Deems Davis # 406 Fuse/Finishing/Panel
http://deemsrv10.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Roger Standley" <taildragon(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Jacks
Date: Aug 25, 2006
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "KiloPapa" <kilopapa(at)antelecom.net>
Subject: Aircraft Door Seal sample
Date: Aug 22, 2006
Below is a picture of the sample door seal from I received from Aircraft Door Seals, LLC. I looks to be a firm texture closed cell foam with a self-adhesive strip. www.aircraftdoorseals.com Kevin 40494 tail/empennage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Sipp" <rsipp(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Forest of Tabs
Date: Aug 26, 2006
----- Original Message ----- From: "Deems Davis" <deemsdavis(at)cox.net> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 4:20 PM Subject: RV10-List: Forest of Tabs > > Where have people mounted their forest of grounding tabs? > > Deems Davis # 406 > Fuse/Finishing/Panel > http://deemsrv10.com/ Here is one option. There are two similar ground connectors mounted above and below the triangular reinforcement where the firewall and top longeron meet. There are at least thirty ground pins available in each connector. The paint was removed under the mounting. I am planning to also terminate the large ground lead from the engine on the same triangular reinforcement. Dick Sipp #65 Finishing ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Roger Standley" <taildragon(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Jacks
Date: Aug 25, 2006
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hasbrouck" <jhasbrouck(at)woh.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Aircraft Door Seal sample
Date: Aug 26, 2006
How does this stuff differ from weatherstripping I can buy at Lowes? Sure looks the same! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Forest of Tabs
Date: Aug 26, 2006
One thing to consider here is that there are now two extra holes in a structural piece that were not envisioned by the aircraft designers. I usually try to avoid putting any additional holes in pieces that hold the engine or gear or flight surfaces securely ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Sipp" <rsipp(at)earthlink.net> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 9:08 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Forest of Tabs > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Deems Davis" <deemsdavis(at)cox.net> > To: > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 4:20 PM > Subject: RV10-List: Forest of Tabs > > >> >> Where have people mounted their forest of grounding tabs? >> >> Deems Davis # 406 >> Fuse/Finishing/Panel >> http://deemsrv10.com/ > > > Here is one option. There are two similar ground connectors mounted above > and below the triangular reinforcement where the firewall and top longeron > meet. There are at least thirty ground pins available in each connector. > The paint was removed under the mounting. I am planning to also terminate > the large ground lead from the engine on the same triangular > reinforcement. > > Dick Sipp #65 > Finishing > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steven DiNieri" <capsteve(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Forest of Tabs
Date: Aug 26, 2006
Where did you find those connectors? steve > > Where have people mounted their forest of grounding tabs? > > Deems Davis # 406 > Fuse/Finishing/Panel > http://deemsrv10.com/ Here is one option. There are two similar ground connectors mounted above and below the triangular reinforcement where the firewall and top longeron meet. There are at least thirty ground pins available in each connector. The paint was removed under the mounting. I am planning to also terminate the large ground lead from the engine on the same triangular reinforcement. Dick Sipp #65 Finishing -- -- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 26, 2006
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Aircraft Door Seal sample
It has a memory, so that once it has taken a set, it doesn't fight the door, but does provide a good seal. I don't think you will find any thing quite like it in the home depot/lowes type store. Contrary to Patrick's experience, I have it on my plane, no problem, but I rarely carry anyone but my SO..so maybe we are more careful than the average passenger. It isn't a big deal to splice in a replacement piece if it does get damaged. I'm curious about the comment that Dick Russ somehow changed the seal for the Cherokee? I don't see anything on his website to indicate any change. John Hasbrouck wrote: > > How does this stuff differ from weatherstripping I can buy at Lowes? > Sure looks the same! > > * > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Sipp" <rsipp(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Forest of Tabs
Date: Aug 27, 2006
----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven DiNieri" <capsteve(at)adelphia.net> Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 8:11 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Forest of Tabs > > Where did you find those connectors? > steve They were supplied with the panel by Aerotronics. Sorry I don't have the source, I am sure Aerotronics would be glad to help. Dick > >> >> Where have people mounted their forest of grounding tabs? >> >> Deems Davis # 406 >> Fuse/Finishing/Panel >> http://deemsrv10.com/ > > > Here is one option. There are two similar ground connectors mounted above > and below the triangular reinforcement where the firewall and top longeron > meet. There are at least thirty ground pins available in each connector. > The paint was removed under the mounting. I am planning to also terminate > the large ground lead from the engine on the same triangular > reinforcement. > > Dick Sipp #65 > Finishing ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GRANSCOTT(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 27, 2006
Subject: Re: Aircraft Door Seal sample
In a message dated 8/27/2006 12:32:49 AM Eastern Standard Time, kellym(at)aviating.com writes: Contrary to Patrick's experience, I have it on my plane, no problem, but I rarely carry anyone but my SO..so maybe we are more careful than the average passenger. It isn't a big deal to splice in a replacement piece if it does get damaged. Kelly for the most part the damage was caused by the rivet heads that pulled the tapped side away from the inside door...the damage/crap part was mainly on the inside door jam and not on the opening as Dick likes to discuss and tell us that is our going in and out of the door. The product from the guy in Washington State is placed on the door...the STC was written for the wrong location... Patrick ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: PIREP on XRX PCAS
Date: Aug 27, 2006
installed an XRX traffic unit in the Glastar. Having a unit to provide both distance and altitude to the traffic is quite helpful. We set the unit to check for transponder replies +- 2000 ft. The traffic is more easily spotted when the altitude is about our level. The previous unit the MRX simply gave distance which could have been far above or below. Also helpful to know whether the conflicting traffic is climbing into our altitude or descending into it. More useful than mode S because it identifies traffic that is interrogated by ATC, military aircraft and TCAS (airlines and corporate) equipped airplanes. At $500 it is far more cost effective than Mode S transponder ($3000) and TCAD at about $5000. In addition it provides an internal altimeter showing pressure altitude or/and your Mode A or Mode C data. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 27, 2006
From: Werner Schneider <glastar(at)gmx.net>
Subject: Re: PIREP on XRX PCAS
Hi David, interesting indeed, but I found it for 1795$ the MRX is 499$, if I can get it somewhere for 500$ it's a done deal, however the aircraft which are not flying with the transponder on are the most dangerouse one, I had more then one near in the last 3 weeks with such traffic. br Werner David McNeill wrote: > > installed an XRX traffic unit in the Glastar. Having a unit to provide > both distance and altitude to the traffic is quite helpful. We set the > unit to check for transponder replies +- 2000 ft. The traffic is more > easily spotted when the altitude is about our level. The previous unit > the MRX simply gave distance which could have been far above or > below. Also helpful to know whether the conflicting traffic is > climbing into our altitude or descending into it. > > More useful than mode S because it identifies traffic that is > interrogated by ATC, military aircraft and TCAS (airlines and > corporate) equipped airplanes. > > At $500 it is far more cost effective than Mode S transponder ($3000) > and TCAD at about $5000. > > In addition it provides an internal altimeter showing pressure > altitude or/and your Mode A or Mode C data. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JSMcGrew(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 27, 2006
Subject: Re: Avionics cooling
Marcus, I have a transponder that is overheating. As a temporary fix, I did exactly what you mentioned. I connected a piece of scat tubing to the passenger vent with a hose clamp and pointed it up toward the stack under the panel. Incidentally, I have been able to keep passengers happy in hot weather by pointing the left side vent across the cockpit. As a more permanent fix I plan on installing some strategically mounted computer fans. Jim In a message dated 8/27/2006 4:19:54 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, coop85(at)bellsouth.net writes: --> RV10-List message posted by: "Marcus Cooper" I have 12 hours on the RV-10 and for the most part all is going well. I have a fairly warm tunnel that I'll apply the techniques offered here to fix. I have two other issues I'll address in separate messages. My avionics are getting REALLY warm, in fact the DYNON is running really slow (hit the timer function and it counts up at about 30% normal speed). What sort of methods are you guys using to keep things under control. I remember several comments about computer fans and that seems like a good idea. I also considered running a blast tube off the ventilation scoop and direct fresh, cool air behind the panel at a slight loss to passenger comfort. Thanks, Marcus Do not archive ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Another Fuse Gotcha - step 29
Date: Aug 27, 2006
From: "Chris Johnston" <CJohnston(at)popsound.com>
hey all - i'm merrily riveting along towards the end of step 29, and as i'm riveting F-1040 (upper fuse channel), i notice that there are nutplate holes on the upper flange that have no nutplates. furthermore, after you rivet it to the bulkhead, you won't be able to get at one of the noles needed for one of the nutplates. I noticed many steps later that there's an access cover that screws into these nonexistant nutplates. i found a little reference to this in the archives and i'll be drilling out a couple rivets to install these nutplates now. NOTE - IT WOULD BE MUCH MORE DIFFICULT AFTER THE FORWARD FUSE SIDE SKIN IS RIVETED ON. this is yet another shortcoming in the (now becoming infamous around here) step 29. fyi cj #40410 fuse ________________________________________________________________________________
From: LessDragProd(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 27, 2006
Subject: Re: NAV Reception
Make certain that the base of the Archer antenna is grounded to the wing skin aluminum along the full length of the antenna base. Jim Ayers In a message dated 08/27/2006 1:25:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time, coop85(at)bellsouth.net writes: --> RV10-List message posted by: "Marcus Cooper" Second question: I am not getting any NAV signal to my Garmin 480 and the SL-30 is very weak, usually non-existent as I cruise around trying different stations. They are on separate antennas, one Bob Archer antenna in each wingtip. Any suggestions to improve the reception would be deeply appreciated. Marcus Do not archive ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ben Westfall" <rv10(at)sinkrate.com>
Subject: Rudder cable fairings
Date: Aug 27, 2006
I am in the middle of riveting the tailcone and wondering if anyone fitted the rudder cable fairings (from avery) at this time? Thought it would be a ton easier w/o the back deck in place. How are people attaching them? Also how far forward or back from the center of the hole do you have to install them to leave adequate room for the cable? I was planning to rivet and proseal them in place covering all but the last 1/3 of the hole or so. Anyone got any pictures or web links covering the installation? I know they are probably pretty simple but I thought I would ask. -Ben #40579 riveting the tailcone ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 27, 2006
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Aircraft Door Seal sample
Well, I guess the shop heads on Piper rivets are sharper than those on the Mooney door. Don't know why that would be the case. He does NOT have an STC. His seal is FAA/PMA approved for Piper, Mooney and Cessna aircraft. The difference is log book entry vs filing a 337. GRANSCOTT(at)aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 8/27/2006 12:32:49 AM Eastern Standard Time, > kellym(at)aviating.com writes: > > Contrary to Patrick's experience, I have it on my plane, no problem, > but > I rarely carry anyone but my SO..so maybe we are more careful than the > average passenger. It isn't a big deal to splice in a replacement piece > if it does get damaged. > > Kelly for the most part the damage was caused by the rivet heads that > pulled the tapped side away from the inside door...the damage/crap part > was mainly on the inside door jam and not on the opening as Dick likes > to discuss and tell us that is our going in and out of the door. The > product from the guy in Washington State is placed on the door...the STC > was written for the wrong location... > > Patrick > > * > > > * ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net>
Subject: Nose wheel problem
Date: Aug 27, 2006
A good friend of mine was down from Iowa this weekend, I'm in the Dallas area, to help me on my plane. He is a very good A&P and I'm very lucky to have his help. Anyway we discussed the front wheel bushing problems the 10 is having and here is the solution he suggested to fix the problem and I think it's a really a good idea. What we did was to take off the nose wheel fork and we drilled a 1/8inch hole into each side of the fork. We then inserted roll pins in each of the holes allowing them to protrude through into the inside by a small amount. We then took the newly supplied bushings and milled a small grove into the edge of the bushing which will allow the roll pin on the interior part of the fork to slide into. This method will definitely stop the bushing from turning. I've attached some photos, which I hope will make it easier to understand. The focus on the pictures wasn't as good as I would have liked but you will get the idea. If you can't retrieve the photos because they aren't on the summary distribution just e-mail me if you would like to see them I will forward them directly to you. Wayne Edgerton # 40336 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net>
Subject: Access to tries for air
Date: Aug 27, 2006
There has been discussions about our ability to pump air into the tires without removing the wheel fairings. I am researching the possibilty of getting access doors the same as some production planes have that allows you to open a small door to service the tire. If I have any luck I will pass it along. But someone gave me a suggestion that might eliminate the need for this. He said to fill the tires with nitrogen and the tires wont go down hardly ever. I think I'll probably give that a try also. Apparently this is done often. I'd never heard of it before. Wayne Edgerton # 40336 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 27, 2006
From: Bill DeRouchey <billderou(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Van's Homecoming
I'll be at Vans Homecoming. Currently have 18.5 hours and need 6.5 more before 9AM Friday when we depart for Aurora. Bill DeRouchey billderou(at)yahoo.com N939SB or #40029 bruce breckenridge wrote: Any "homecomers"? Looks like decent weather out here on the west coast for Van's Homecoming. Bruce 40018 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: PILOTDDS(at)AOL.COM
Date: Aug 27, 2006
Subject: Re: Van's Homecoming
728dd will be there ________________________________________________________________________________
From: LessDragProd(at)AOL.COM
Date: Aug 28, 2006
Subject: Re: NAV Reception
Clean the paint out of the dimple in the skin for the flush screw. Jim In a message dated 08/27/2006 6:49:01 PM Pacific Daylight Time, coop85(at)bellsouth.net writes: I attached the nutplates through the antenna base that hold the wingtips on per the instructions. Is anyone going beyond this? Marcus Do not archive ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 28, 2006
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Subject: Re: Nose wheel problem
That's basically what I had said was an excellent solution. I'd do it myself, but with the deep grove worn in my fork, I'm not sure how much I want to drill mine until I get a new fork. But, one thing about that solution is that as it wears in, you'll still have to worry about the bearing spinning against the inner edge of that spacer if you don't have lots of tension on it. The seal is draggy on that bearing, and you may end up having the bearing not turn, but turn on the axle shaft instead. If that happens, you're going to need to shave a little off your axle shaft to get the tension back. So you've got a great solution. Randy did about the same thing a couple weeks ago. Just make sure the preload is good on the bearings. Tim Wayne Edgerton wrote: > A good friend of mine was down from Iowa this weekend, I'm in the Dallas > area, to help me on my plane. He is a very good A&P and I'm very lucky > to have his help. > > Anyway we discussed the front wheel bushing problems the 10 is having > and here is the solution he suggested to fix the problem and I think > it's a really a good idea. What we did was to take off the nose wheel > fork and we drilled a 1/8inch hole into each side of the fork. We then > inserted roll pins in each of the holes allowing them to protrude > through into the inside by a small amount. We then took the newly > supplied bushings and milled a small grove into the edge of the bushing > which will allow the roll pin on the interior part of the fork to slide > into. This method will definitely stop the bushing from turning. > > I've attached some photos, which I hope will make it easier to > understand. The focus on the pictures wasn't as good as I would have > liked but you will get the idea. If you can't retrieve the photos > because they aren't on the summary distribution just e-mail me if you > would like to see them I will forward them directly to you. > > Wayne Edgerton # 40336 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Sargeant" <k5wiv(at)amsat.org>
Subject: Access to tries for air
Date: Aug 28, 2006
The main advantage to filling tires (and other things such as air/oil shocks, etc.) dry nitrogen rather than air is a much lower thermal expansion ratio so that pressure remains more constant with temperature changes. I suppose that being clean, dry and oxygen free it would result in less deterioration of the inner tube but most tires and tubes will be replaced before that becomes significant. Jack & Cecilia Sargeant 1127 Patricia St. Wichita, KS 67208-2642 316/683-5268 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Wayne Edgerton Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 9:34 PM To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RV10-List: Access to tries for air There has been discussions about our ability to pump air into the tires without removing the wheel fairings. I am researching the possibilty of getting access doors the same as some production planes have that allows you to open a small door to service the tire. If I have any luck I will pass it along. But someone gave me a suggestion that might eliminate the need for this. He said to fill the tires with nitrogen and the tires wont go down hardly ever. I think I'll probably give that a try also. Apparently this is done often. I'd never heard of it before. Wayne Edgerton # 40336 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Power settings used for Instrument Approaches
Date: Aug 28, 2006
From: "Doerr, Ray R [NTK]" <Ray.R.Doerr(at)sprint.com>
I am currently working on my Instrument ticket in my RV-10. I was wondering what power settings people are using for approach speeds? I was using something like 19" and 1900 rpm with 10 degree of flaps for a 90 Knot straight and level, but then when you are doing down the 3 degree glideslopp it would be like 1900 rpm and 13". But then this is no good if you need to go around. because now you have to bother with prop and throttle at a time where you only have 200 ft above the ground. I was going to try some power settings tomorrow with the rpm somewhere between 2400 - 2500 and then just figure out what MAP I need for staright and level at 90 knots and then what I need going down the glide slope. Can other share what they use for this? Thanks Ray Doerr ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: NAV Reception
Date: Aug 28, 2006
From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder(at)sausen.net>
I stole an idea from Dan Checkoway's site and used some aluminum HVAC tape to increase the contact area of the antenna/wing. You can look around his site for the info and I have a little info here: http://www.mykitlog.com/users/category.php?user=msausen&project=22&ca teg ory=624 Michael Sausen ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Cooper Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 8:47 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: NAV Reception I attached the nutplates through the antenna base that hold the wingtips on per the instructions. Is anyone going beyond this? Marcus ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of LessDragProd(at)aol.com Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 5:46 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: NAV Reception Make certain that the base of the Archer antenna is grounded to the wing skin aluminum along the full length of the antenna base. Jim Ayers In a message dated 08/27/2006 1:25:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time, coop85(at)bellsouth.net writes: Second question: I am not getting any NAV signal to my Garmin 480 and the SL-30 is very weak, usually non-existent as I cruise around trying different stations. They are on separate antennas, one Bob Archer antenna in each wingtip. Any suggestions to improve the reception would be deeply appreciated. Marcus ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <rvmail(at)thelefflers.com>
Subject: Re: Access to tries for air
Date: Aug 28, 2006
Nitrogen should be available at most FBOs. Pipers use nitrogen to inflate the struts. I've not encountered a problem getting nitrogen for my Cherokee 180. Although, I admit my sampling is small. > > From: "Marcus Cooper" <coop85(at)bellsouth.net> > Date: 2006/08/28 Mon AM 09:13:01 EDT > To: > Subject: RE: RV10-List: Access to tries for air > > practicality for GA airplanes. What is the availability of nitrogen at the > standard airport? Also, is there any danger in mixing Nitrogen and regular > compressed air if you do need to top it off a little and there's no Nitrogen > around? > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Serious Front Axle Maintenance Issue on the RV-10
Date: Aug 28, 2006
From: "Doerr, Ray R [NTK]" <Ray.R.Doerr(at)sprint.com>
I have a ratchet strap around 6 - 50 lbs bags of gravel (300 lbs total) that I connect to the tail tie down. Thank You Ray Doerr CDNI Principal Engineer Sprint PCS 16020 West 113th Street Lenexa, KS 66219 Mailstop KSLNXK0101 (913) 859-1414 (Office) (913) 226-0106 (Pcs) (913) 859-1234 (Fax) Ray.R.Doerr(at)sprint.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of bcondrey Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 9:44 AM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Serious Front Axle Maintenance Issue on the RV-10 I just talked w/Tom at Van's and his suggestion is to check spacing with a feeler gauge and adjust the axle accordingly. He also said that behavior would be possibly be very different with the wheel off the ground than with full weight on it. I guess I'll be measuring and adjusting the front axle length tonight... On related note - what's the best way to jack up the plane for nose wheel work? I've been using my engine hoist but assume there's another option for "in the field" work. Bob Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=56657#56657 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 28, 2006
From: Jay Brinkmeyer <jaybrinkmeyer(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: firewall eyeball question
I'm wanting to install firewall eyeballs in my firewall before attaching the side skins... The Vans store lists: Steel Bulkhead Fitting -- Part No: EYEBALL SE961-125S Bulkhead carry through assembly for control cables or wiring. Hole size 1/8", can be enlarged up to 0.26" as required. Does anyone know if this part provides adequate hole clearance for the ($500!) Vans RV-10 throttle quadrant cables? At the risk of starting a flame war... SS eyeballs are preferred, right? Thanks, Jay Slooow building everything __________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 28, 2006
From: Dan Masys <dmasys(at)cox.net>
Subject: Forest of Tabs
B&C has several different configurations of 'forest of tabs' grounding plates: http://www.bandcspecialty.com/cgi-bin/ez-catalog/cat_display.cgi?26X358218 -Dan Masys FWF and panel ---- Steven DiNieri wrote: > > Where did you find those connectors? > steve > > > > > Where have people mounted their forest of grounding tabs? > > > > Deems Davis # 406 > > Fuse/Finishing/Panel > > http://deemsrv10.com/ > > > > Here is one option. There are two similar ground connectors mounted above > and below the triangular reinforcement where the firewall and top longeron > meet. There are at least thirty ground pins available in each connector. > The paint was removed under the mounting. I am planning to also terminate > the large ground lead from the engine on the same triangular reinforcement. > > Dick Sipp #65 > Finishing > > -- > > > > -- > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Lauritsen - Work" <mike(at)cleavelandtool.com>
Subject: firewall eyeball question
Date: Aug 28, 2006
We sell both the Steel (plated not stainless) and the Aluminum pass-through. Both can be enlarged, but the Aluminum come out much nicer. My theory is that if you burn through the 3/4" of Aluminum, you have a bigger problem (like all of the 1/8" rivets going through the firewall). I don't know but I would guess the cables are larger than 1/4". The Aluminum eyeball you can drill up to 5/8" before running into problems. Mike Lauritsen Cleaveland Aircraft Tool 2225 First St. Boone, Iowa 50036 515-432-6794 mike(at)cleavelandtool.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jay Brinkmeyer Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 10:40 AM Subject: RV10-List: firewall eyeball question I'm wanting to install firewall eyeballs in my firewall before attaching the side skins... The Vans store lists: Steel Bulkhead Fitting -- Part No: EYEBALL SE961-125S Bulkhead carry through assembly for control cables or wiring. Hole size 1/8", can be enlarged up to 0.26" as required. Does anyone know if this part provides adequate hole clearance for the ($500!) Vans RV-10 throttle quadrant cables? At the risk of starting a flame war... SS eyeballs are preferred, right? Thanks, Jay Slooow building everything __________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: John Ackerman <johnag5b(at)cableone.net>
Subject: Re: Access to tries for air
Date: Aug 28, 2006
> The main advantage to filling tires... (with) dry nitrogen... isa > much lower thermal expansion ratio... _Gaseous_ air and nitrogen have very nearly identical thermal expansion ratios. The physical description of this follows from the gas laws, so that P1/P2 = T1/T2 where P is pressure and T is temperature on an absolute scale like Kelvin or Rankine is a very good aproximation. Worst case: If the "air" contains a mist of water droplets, this liquid water might keep on collecting inside the tire/tube with repeated fillings. If the the tire contains a heckuva lot of liquid water, and if it were to heat up under hard braking to, say, 250 F, the pressure increase due to evaporation of that water would be an additional 30 psi over that of a tire filled with "dry" (no liquid water) nitrogen or air. The dry-gas filled tire in this case would have about an 80% increase in pressure, assuming it were filled at 50 F. If it "only" heats to 180 F, the pressure increase due to evaporation would be about 8 psi. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vapor_pressure#Water_vapor_pressure or any chemical handbook, among many other sources. The "dry" part could conceivably be some advantage in mitigating corrosion of the wheels _internal_ to the tires, if the compressed air source were saturated with water, as many are. Thing is, most 10s will be using inner tubes, so the water may never see the metal parts (except the valve stem). In the heavy airplane case, it's another story entirely - higher temps would make all the difference, I think. Might they also be tubeless? No harm in using dry nitrogen, especially if the air you would otherwise be using is of particularly poor quality - like from a compressor that doesn't get drained periodically. > I suppose that being clean, dry and oxygen free it wouldresult > inless deterioration of the inner tube but most tires and tubes will > be replaced before that becomes significant. I agree. The thing is sitting in an air environment, after all. John Ackerman 40458 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 28, 2006
From: Jay Brinkmeyer <jaybrinkmeyer(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Kwikpath plenum corregated PVDF conduit for fuse cable runs
I found an outfit that will ship small quantities of fuse conduit used to plumb the cabin midsection. I believe this product is similar to that referred to in an eariler posting by TimO (he said 10 feet should do it). Note that the vendors I've spoken with in the past don't like to ship small or custom quantities... Accutech (see below) will ship whatever length desired. Cheers, Jay Product: Plenum Raceway (PVDF - no smoke) 1" conduit @ 1.35/ft + shipping partNumber: KPV100TR productCode: 124065 website: http://www.ipexinc.com/Content/EN_CA/2_0_Products/2_2_electrical_systems/2_2_1_8_Kwikpath.asp Search On: "KPV100TR" submit registration info (ugh!), and then open the doc "Kwikpath Communication Raceway System" Ordering:Accutech (http://www.accu-tech.com/branch_losangeles.html) Ask for... Mark Cutri (714)994-8000 __________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 28, 2006
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Access to tries for air
Also rather doubtful that it makes much difference in the thermal expansion or leak rate of tires with normal 30-50psi inflation. Probably the biggest advantage of compressed nitrogen is that it is moisture free, which a lot of compressed air is not. Quoting "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" : > Considering regular air is already 78% nitrogen, I doubt there would be > any problem adding compressed air to a nitrogen filled tire. > > Michael Sausen > > ________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 28, 2006
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Access to tries for air
I can buy the argument of nitrogen for turbine aircraft because they operate at much higher pressure and fly at altitudes where temps are in the -20 to -60 range. However, your statement that airline tires filled with air need to be thrown away defies logic. How do they keep air away from the tires from the time they are made until they are installed? How do they protect the tires being recapped? Why would it make any difference if the tire misfilled was simply deflated, dismounted, and any moisture wiped out? Is there some on line reference to this policy? The sum total mention of nitrogen in AC43-13-1B(chg 1) Chapter 9, page 9-11, consists of: "NOTE: The use of nitrogen to inflate tires is recommended. Do not use oxygen to inflate tires. Deflate tires prior to removing them from the air- craft or when built-up tire assemblies are being shipped." If there were hazards associated with air, you would think it would get mentioned there. The reference to oxygen is obviously pure oxygen which of course poses a fire hazard. Skydrol is much more fire resistant than 5606, so don't see why that should be an issue. I can see risks for tubeless tires, but GA planes all use tubes, so any moisture isn't going to get to the inside of the wheel anyway. If you have a brake fire severe enough to cause a leak or blowout in the tire, the tire is likely to blow a hole and release all the pressure very rapidly, and then what is in the tire makes little difference. Quoting "John W. Cox" : > Air carriers have to discard perfectly good tires if they are > accidently filled with air. Fire suppression upon a brake fire is > the other reason for nitrogen filled tires. But then air carriers > use phosphate ester (Skydrol) instead of H-5606 hydraulic fluid for > additional protection. > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Rudder cable fairings
Date: Aug 28, 2006
From: "Chris Johnston" <CJohnston(at)popsound.com>
Hey ben - I didn't see a response to your query, and I tried to post yesterday and I don't think it went through. I actually put k1100 nutplates and screws to hold the fairings, because I wanted them to really cover the opening, but if you do it that way, the cable is captured in there, and non-removeable (read serviceable). I stuck the rudder cable sleeve in there to position the fairing, then marked it and put the nutplates. I have a pic of it on this page... http://www.perfectlygoodairplane.net/Tailcone/tailcone8.htm Also, I did it before I riveted the skin on the tailcone. I think it would be a pain to do after. cj #40410 www.perfectlygoodairplane.net fuse -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ben Westfall Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 3:23 PM Subject: RV10-List: Rudder cable fairings I am in the middle of riveting the tailcone and wondering if anyone fitted the rudder cable fairings (from avery) at this time? Thought it would be a ton easier w/o the back deck in place. How are people attaching them? Also how far forward or back from the center of the hole do you have to install them to leave adequate room for the cable? I was planning to rivet and proseal them in place covering all but the last 1/3 of the hole or so. Anyone got any pictures or web links covering the installation? I know they are probably pretty simple but I thought I would ask. -Ben #40579 riveting the tailcone ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John R. Lewis" <john(at)aspzone.com>
Subject: Required tools for toolbox kit
Date: Aug 28, 2006
I spent a few hours bumming around Vans today, and came home with a stupid grin on my face because I got to ride in the RV-10. All I've ever flown in is a Cessna 172. I was absolutely amazed at how the RV-10 performed. I also came home with the toolbox kit. It seems that I am going to need quite a few tools. As I am not going to be building my RV-10 right away, I am going to have trouble convincing my wife that I need to order several hundred dollars worth of tools from Cleveland or Avery for this little toolbox project. What is the minimum list of tools I will need? Where is a good source for finding what I need used or otherwise discounted? --- John R. Lewis john(at)aspzone.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Dunne" <acs(at)acspropeller.com.au>
Subject: Required tools for toolbox kit
Date: Aug 29, 2006
Hi John. Try Cleaveland Tools for a starter kit for the RV Empennage. Around $750 USD. Well worth the investment and sets you up well for the rest of the kit. www.cleavelandtoolstore.com <http://www.cleavelandtoolstore.com/> Half your luck with the ride in the -10! John 40315 From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John R. Lewis Sent: Tuesday, 29 August 2006 4:38 PM Subject: RV10-List: Required tools for toolbox kit I spent a few hours bumming around Vans today, and came home with a stupid grin on my face because I got to ride in the RV-10. All I've ever flown in is a Cessna 172. I was absolutely amazed at how the RV-10 performed. I also came home with the toolbox kit. It seems that I am going to need quite a few tools. As I am not going to be building my RV-10 right away, I am going to have trouble convincing my wife that I need to order several hundred dollars worth of tools from Cleveland or Avery for this little toolbox project. What is the minimum list of tools I will need? Where is a good source for finding what I need used or otherwise discounted? --- John R. Lewis john(at)aspzone.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Schipper <mike(at)learningplanet.com>
Subject: Re: Required tools for toolbox kit
Date: Aug 29, 2006
John, One thing that you might want to consider is to find a local builder and ask for some assistance. It will give you a quick taste of what it's like to build, and you won't have to buy any tools. When I started my first RV I was fortunate enough to know a local builder and he patiently helped me work through the practice kit that I had bought. I bet you can find a local builder who would do the same for you. Regards, Mike Schipper RV-9A - N63MS - Flying (www.my9a.com) RV-10 #40576 - Empennage (www.rvten.com) On Aug 29, 2006, at 1:37 AM, John R. Lewis wrote: > I also came home with the toolbox kit. It seems that I am going to > need quite a few tools. As I am not going to be building my RV-10 > right away, I am going to have trouble convincing my wife that I > need to order several hundred dollars worth of tools from Cleveland > or Avery for this little toolbox project. > > > What is the minimum list of tools I will need? > > > Where is a good source for finding what I need used or otherwise > discounted? ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Required tools for toolbox kit
Date: Aug 29, 2006
From: "Condrey, Bob (US SSA)" <bob.condrey(at)baesystems.com>
John, I'd recommend finding a local builder and borrowing what you'll need - EAA chapter would be an excellent place to start. Specific answer to your question is that you need to be able to drill holes, dimple holes, debur holes and drive rivets. If you want to purchase tools, I think the only hole size you need a bit for is #40 and you can use whatever drill you already have. Since you are dealing with such a limited quantity of holes you can either purchase a purpose built tool or use a larger drill bit or hardware store countersink (size/angle is unimportant). For the edges you can use a file to remove shear marks and burrs. For dimples you could get by with a pop-rivet dimpler which just uses a standard pop-rivet squeezer, you would only need to purchase pop-rivet dimple dies for 3/32" rivets. At that point you've covered everything except driving rivets. Instead of buying a rivet squeezer of any sort you can almost certainly borrow a hand squeezer from any builder that has a pneumatic unit and not have to worry about being pressed for time. Every rivet on the toolbox, except for the ones that hold the handle on, can be set using a squeezer. I'm sure any builder would welcome you for a visit to drive those few. Of course, you could always spend several hundred dollars and have a REAL head start on what you'll need for the plane... Where are you located? Bob #40105 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John R. Lewis Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 1:38 AM Subject: RV10-List: Required tools for toolbox kit I spent a few hours bumming around Vans today, and came home with a stupid grin on my face because I got to ride in the RV-10. All I've ever flown in is a Cessna 172. I was absolutely amazed at how the RV-10 performed. I also came home with the toolbox kit. It seems that I am going to need quite a few tools. As I am not going to be building my RV-10 right away, I am going to have trouble convincing my wife that I need to order several hundred dollars worth of tools from Cleveland or Avery for this little toolbox project. What is the minimum list of tools I will need? Where is a good source for finding what I need used or otherwise discounted? --- John R. Lewis john(at)aspzone.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 29, 2006
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Access to tires for air
I wasn't questioning airline policy of using nitrogen. I was questioning policy that your first post said a tire was "thrown away" if accidently filled with air. Obviously you have now revised that to dismount and remount. Like Skydrol, nitrogen has its place in turbine aircraft. For piston aircraft you will do yourself a lot more of a favor to put a drier on your compressor and frequently drain the tank than having a compressed bottle of nitrogen around, that has no use other than airing up tires. Having that tank in your hangar is more of a hazard than any benefit to the tires. It isn't about cost or cutting corners. Just because the airlines do it doesn't mean that GA and experimentals need to follow their rigid and moribund path. Most airlines don't have a glass display that the pilot can monitor his progress on an airport taxiway..childs play for any good electronic flight bag that any GA pilot can use, such as a Garmin 496 or some of your built in glass panels. 49 people paid the ultimate price because airlines can't get avionics advances approved without a gazillion dollars and years of FAA lack of decision making. Airlines also employ a lot of uncertified folks working on their planes under supervision, so they can't allow any flexibility in thinking, just like the military. KM A&P/IA Quoting "John W. Cox" : > Not going to explain the Air Carrier policy. When air is installed > (by accident of course). Tire is required to be dismounted and > returned for safety inspection. It is replaced with a correctly > filled tire. > Kelly, may you fly boldly, long and safe. I just > thought there was value in the points made. Sorry for the bandwidth. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Albert Gardner" <ibspud(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Required tools for toolbox kit
Date: Aug 29, 2006
The minimum list of tools required for the toolbox will be much shorter than those required to build the plane. The required list breaks down into 2 parts: those you own yourself and those you can borrow from others. If it's expensive and/or seldom used suggest borrowing (and returning) the tool. Building a plane (and a toolbox) can be the best opportunity you might ever have to become acquainted with some of the world's greatest people. Join your local EAA chapter, visit builders, and let them educate and befriend you. Avery and Cleveland seem to have attracted the most vocal supporters but there are other sources. The RV list often has offers of used tools. I had a flat tire at an unfamiliar airport last week and I was hardly out of the plane before the locals began gathering to help. Made some friends and enjoyed the time spent fixing the tire. Albert Gardner Yuma, AZ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 29, 2006
From: "Pascal" <pascalreid(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Required tools for toolbox kit
John; I know the feeling! Check out Van's site http://www.vansaircraft.com/public/rqd-tool.htm this will tell you what is needed for the tool kit. someone recommended you get the starter kit from cleveland- http://www.cleavelandtoolstore.com/prodinfo.asp?number=EMPKITW that would be the easiest solution. I have the same kit and am slowly finding good tools on e-bay but eventually will buy everything from different vendors. I would recommend you take the sportair course. $300 or so dollars and you'll basically build the toolkit in a teaching environment, certainly less than buying tools before their time. If you're experienced and don't need the course, have an air compressor and plan to start the kit within the year buy the tools. I have spent numerous hours planning, so feel free to contact me with any further questions. Pascal ----- Original Message ----- From: John R. Lewis To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 11:37 PM Subject: RV10-List: Required tools for toolbox kit I spent a few hours bumming around Vans today, and came home with a stupid grin on my face because I got to ride in the RV-10. All I've ever flown in is a Cessna 172. I was absolutely amazed at how the RV-10 performed. I also came home with the toolbox kit. It seems that I am going to need quite a few tools. As I am not going to be building my RV-10 right away, I am going to have trouble convincing my wife that I need to order several hundred dollars worth of tools from Cleveland or Avery for this little toolbox project. What is the minimum list of tools I will need? Where is a good source for finding what I need used or otherwise discounted? --- John R. Lewis john(at)aspzone.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 29, 2006
From: Jay Brinkmeyer <jaybrinkmeyer(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Avionics cooling
I'll byte... What sort of "avionics" fan are you guys referring to and where does one get one? I'm guessing Spruce (like everything else), but I haven't looked. Anyone know if Dynon is using mil-spec parts? How about gluing on a heat sink? Seems like the Dynon engineering department might be interested in real world feedback. Does anyone have photos of where they are mounted said fans? Thanks, Jay looking forward to bending fuse skins - not! __________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Avionics cooling
Date: Aug 29, 2006
From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder(at)sausen.net>
Yep Spruce. It's a multi port fan that you can hook SCAT tube to. Not overly expensive either. Michael Sausen -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jay Brinkmeyer Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 12:15 PM Subject: RV10-List: Avionics cooling --> I'll byte... What sort of "avionics" fan are you guys referring to and where does one get one? I'm guessing Spruce (like everything else), but I haven't looked. Anyone know if Dynon is using mil-spec parts? How about gluing on a heat sink? Seems like the Dynon engineering department might be interested in real world feedback. Does anyone have photos of where they are mounted said fans? Thanks, Jay looking forward to bending fuse skins - not! __________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rob Wright" <armywrights(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Access to tires for air
Date: Aug 29, 2006
Kelly, you're fairly new to the list. What's your builder number? Wondering what we're up to now... Rob Wright #392 Riveting Bottom Wing Skins ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 29, 2006
From: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: NAV Reception
And I stole the idea from Michael who stole it from Dan. You can see some of my photos here <http://lrosen.nerv10.com/Construct/Log/Wings/Tips/index.html> Larry Rosen #356 RV Builder (Michael Sausen) wrote: > I stole an idea from Dan Checkoway's site and used some aluminum HVAC > tape to increase the contact area of the antenna/wing. You can look > around his site for the info and I have a little info here: > > http://www.mykitlog.com/users/category.php?user=msausen&project=22&category=624 > <http://www.mykitlog.com/users/category.php?user=msausen&project=22&category=624> > > Michael Sausen > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Marcus Cooper > *Sent:* Sunday, August 27, 2006 8:47 PM > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* RE: RV10-List: NAV Reception > > I attached the nutplates through the antenna base that hold the > wingtips on per the instructions. Is anyone going beyond this? > > > > Marcus > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of > *LessDragProd(at)aol.com > *Sent:* Sunday, August 27, 2006 5:46 PM > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* Re: RV10-List: NAV Reception > > > > Make certain that the base of the Archer antenna is grounded to the > wing skin aluminum along the full length of the antenna base. > > > > Jim Ayers > > > > In a message dated 08/27/2006 1:25:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time, > coop85(at)bellsouth.net writes: > > > > Second question: I am not getting any NAV signal to my Garmin 480 > and the > SL-30 is very weak, usually non-existent as I cruise around trying > different > stations. They are on separate antennas, one Bob Archer antenna > in each > wingtip. Any suggestions to improve the reception would be deeply > appreciated. > > Marcus > > > > * * > * * > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > *<>* > * * > * > > s.com/Navigator?RV10-List > > * > * > > > * ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 29, 2006
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Access to tires for air
Yet to be determined. I'm learning from all you folks before I commit to start. Hoping to get a test flight at Copperstate flyin. I've been lurking for probably 3-4 months. Rob Wright wrote: > > > Kelly, you're fairly new to the list. What's your builder number? > Wondering what we're up to now... > > > Rob Wright > #392 > Riveting Bottom Wing Skins > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: ADI Pilot II
Date: Aug 30, 2006
From: "McGANN, Ron" <ron.mcgann(at)baesystems.com>
All Anyone know when the 2 1/4" ADI Pilots will be available? I don't really want to install a Pictorial Pilot and Altrak, only to replace them in the near future. cheers, Ron 187 finishing ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: ADI Pilot II
Date: Aug 29, 2006
ADI Pilot III spoke to TT yesterday on that subject. they assured me that the 2.25" ADI would be available by December.I have a hole in the panel for the ADI as the third way to keep the wings level. ----- Original Message ----- From: McGANN, Ron To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 9:31 PM Subject: RV10-List: ADI Pilot II All Anyone know when the 2 1/4" ADI Pilots will be available? I don't really want to install a Pictorial Pilot and Altrak, only to replace them in the near future. cheers, Ron 187 finishing ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DAVE LEIKAM" <DAVELEIKAM(at)wi.rr.com>
Subject: tech counselor
Date: Aug 30, 2006
How often must I have a tech counselor check my work if at all? How elaborate should my log (picture) book be? I may be a little late asking these questions. Dave Leikam Muskego, WI N89DA #40496 - elevators ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Ritter" <mritter509(at)msn.com>
Subject: tech counselor
Date: Aug 30, 2006
Dave - My DAR came by only two or three times while I was building the plane (two and one half years). You might want to check with your DAR to see if he is interested in looking at the plane during the building process. As for my logbook all I did was initial and date each step in the plans as I completed the step. I took maybe 50 pictures with me posing with a tool of some sort in my hand. Mark (N410MR) >From: "DAVE LEIKAM" <DAVELEIKAM(at)wi.rr.com> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: "matronics" >Subject: RV10-List: tech counselor >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 00:41:05 -0500 > >How often must I have a tech counselor check my work if at all? How >elaborate should my log (picture) book be? I may be a little late asking >these questions. > >Dave Leikam >Muskego, WI >N89DA >#40496 - elevators > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DejaVu" <wvu(at)ameritel.net>
Subject: Re: ADI Pilot II
Date: Aug 30, 2006
ADI Pilot IIYou can temporarily put a TT 2.25" Turn&Bank in place of the ADI while waiting. When the ADI becomes available return the T&B and pay the difference for the ADI. Anh ----- Original Message ----- From: David McNeill To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 1:09 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: ADI Pilot II I spoke to TT yesterday on that subject. they assured me that the 2.25" ADI would be available by December.I have a hole in the panel for the ADI as the third way to keep the wings level. ----- Original Message ----- From: McGANN, Ron To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 9:31 PM Subject: RV10-List: ADI Pilot II All Anyone know when the 2 1/4" ADI Pilots will be available? I don't really want to install a Pictorial Pilot and Altrak, only to replace them in the near future. cheers, Ron 187 finishing s.com/Navigator?RV10-List ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Eric Parlow" <ericparlow(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Wiring Diagram and Software
Date: Aug 30, 2006
Two questions: 1.) Does anyone have a detailed wiring diagram available for reference and to use as a template based on the Aeroelectric recommendations? 2.) What software is available to make detailed wiring diagrams at a reasonable cost? ERic-- 40014 N104EP RV-10 Avionics ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Ritter" <mritter509(at)msn.com>
Subject: tech counselor
Date: Aug 30, 2006
Dave - I had an FAA guy from FSDO follow the DAR around during the inspection. He did not seem interested in my logbook (signed off plans) or pictures. He let me apply for my repairman certificate by mail which I now have. That was nice since the closest FSDO office is an 80 mile trip to San Antonio. Mark (N410MR) >From: "Mark Ritter" <mritter509(at)msn.com> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RE: RV10-List: tech counselor >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 05:02:56 -0500 > > >Dave - My DAR came by only two or three times while I was building the >plane (two and one half years). You might want to check with your DAR to >see if he is interested in looking at the plane during the building >process. As for my logbook all I did was initial and date each step in the >plans as I completed the step. I took maybe 50 pictures with me posing >with a tool of some sort in my hand. > >Mark (N410MR) > > >>From: "DAVE LEIKAM" <DAVELEIKAM(at)wi.rr.com> >>Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >>To: "matronics" >>Subject: RV10-List: tech counselor >>Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 00:41:05 -0500 >> >>How often must I have a tech counselor check my work if at all? How >>elaborate should my log (picture) book be? I may be a little late asking >>these questions. >> >>Dave Leikam >>Muskego, WI >>N89DA >>#40496 - elevators >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 30, 2006
From: Rick <ricksked(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Wiring Diagram and Software
Eric, Just in case you only have the book, got to the attached link and check out these diagrams. Especially Z-14 and Z-19 under DC power. Short of giving you the wiring diagrams for your avionics harnesses you should be able to wire the entire aircraft with the info in these pages. If it seems greek to you seek help from your local builder or ESS chapter. Bob's book is great on theory and short on actual "how to's". Many of the RV-10 and other RV builder sites have their own diagrams and power distribution for you to "borrow" for ideas ;) Tim has a Z diagram and William Curtis has a good schematic as well. http://www.aeroelectric.com/PPS Rick S. 40185 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rob Wright" <armywrights(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: gretz
Date: Aug 30, 2006
Wondering if anyone has pictures of how you plumbed your gretz pitot tube. Specifically, did you bend your copper tubing or connect your other line to it with a bend or with an elbow fitting? I'm also using the SafeAir tubing so any help on that would be great too. Rob Wright #392 Wings ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 30, 2006
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: gretz
I used aluminum formed with a bender to bulkhead fittings on the next wing rib - then poly tubing to the wing root. I got pictures at home - I'll try to get them to you soon, Ralph -----Original Message----- >From: Rob Wright <armywrights(at)adelphia.net> >Sent: Aug 30, 2006 9:41 AM >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV10-List: gretz > >Wondering if anyone has pictures of how you plumbed your gretz pitot tube. >Specifically, did you bend your copper tubing or connect your other line to >it with a bend or with an elbow fitting? I'm also using the SafeAir tubing >so any help on that would be great too. > > > >Rob Wright > >#392 > >Wings > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Avionics coolingAvionics cooling
Date: Aug 30, 2006
From: "Lockamy, Jack L" <jack.lockamy(at)navy.mil>
I purchased and installed an inexpensive ($18) 12-volt fan from Radio Shack. Here is a link: http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2102826&cp=&ori gkw=fan&kw=fan&parentPage=search Built a small bracket and mounted it on a rib behind the avionics stack. It is powered on automatically when I turn the Avionics Master switch on. It's quiet, small, lightweight, and seems to be doing the job. Just another suggestion... Jack Lockamy Camarillo, CA RV-7A N174JL 220 hrs RV-10... maybe www.jacklockamy.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: tech counselor
Date: Aug 30, 2006
From: "Vern W. Smith" <Vern(at)teclabsinc.com>
Dave, Keep in mind the building log is for your use long after the sign off. So if there is anything you might like a picture of in 10 years, for maintenance, take a picture of it. Also if there is any thing you do a little different from the plans or that isn't clear in the plans (that comes later in the fuel tank section), document it for future reference. I think tech counselor visits vary. Mine asked to see the skeleton of the rudder before skinning, the wings before closing them and during system installation. Talk to your counselor and see what he recommends. Again this is for your benefit. There is a lot to building an airplane and having extra eyes on a project is a good thing. If something's not quite right it's better to find out during the building process than during the FAA inspection or worse yet in the air. For what it's worth, Vern Smith (#40324 wings) _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of DAVE LEIKAM Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:41 PM Subject: RV10-List: tech counselor How often must I have a tech counselor check my work if at all? How elaborate should my log (picture) book be? I may be a little late asking these questions. Dave Leikam Muskego, WI N89DA #40496 - elevators ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 30, 2006
From: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: gretz
You can see how William Curtis ran the pitot tube here <http://wcurtis.nerv10.com/07Wings/index7.html> -- Larry Rosen RV-10 #356 http://lrosen.nerv10.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jdalton77" <jdalton77(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: tech counselor
Date: Aug 30, 2006
I've had my tech counselor out twice during the construction of the tailcone, and I'll have him out at least once more before this sub-kit is done. I ask him to come out whenever I reach a major milestone or when I have enough questions to make it worth our time for him to come out. ----- Original Message ----- From: Vern W. Smith To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 11:55 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: tech counselor Dave, Keep in mind the building log is for your use long after the sign off. So if there is anything you might like a picture of in 10 years, for maintenance, take a picture of it. Also if there is any thing you do a little different from the plans or that isn't clear in the plans (that comes later in the fuel tank section), document it for future reference. I think tech counselor visits vary. Mine asked to see the skeleton of the rudder before skinning, the wings before closing them and during system installation. Talk to your counselor and see what he recommends. Again this is for your benefit. There is a lot to building an airplane and having extra eyes on a project is a good thing. If something's not quite right it's better to find out during the building process than during the FAA inspection or worse yet in the air. For what it's worth, Vern Smith (#40324 wings) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of DAVE LEIKAM Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:41 PM To: matronics Subject: RV10-List: tech counselor How often must I have a tech counselor check my work if at all? How elaborate should my log (picture) book be? I may be a little late asking these questions. Dave Leikam Muskego, WI N89DA #40496 - elevators ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Lauritsen - Work" <mike(at)cleavelandtool.com>
Subject: Nose wheel problem
Date: Aug 30, 2006
FYI I just got off the phone with Ken K. the Engineer at Van's and he enlightened me on how the new parts are to be installed on this nose wheel. This may have been covered, but I didn't notice it. First the axle is supposed to be "floating" in between the fork not at such a length that it is compressed by the fork. I was under the impression that it was supposed to be just the right length so that when the spacers were tight against the bearing (causing the bearing to remain stationary) that the axle would then be tight. I saw something about using a feeler gauge and sanding the end of the axle. According to Ken the axle is used to support the bolt and keep the bearings centered, and it's length should be about 1/16" shorter than the sum of the other parts when torqued. Second the entire assembly should be torqued to the torque spec for the bolt that goes through the fork and axle. He says this seems like a lot of torque, but Matco says that it is fine for that bearing and it gives enough pressure for the new spacers to lock on to the bearing. He says the wheel will be draggy, but that is the way it is supposed to be. Again at this point the axle will be floating inside the assembly. The assembly can also be checked simply by re-torqueing during inspection. This method of adjustment skirts the 'this feels about right' method of adjustment. Mike Lauritsen Cleaveland Aircraft Tool 2225 First St. Boone, Iowa 50036 515-432-6794 mike(at)cleavelandtool.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Olson Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 1:23 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Nose wheel problem That's basically what I had said was an excellent solution. I'd do it myself, but with the deep grove worn in my fork, I'm not sure how much I want to drill mine until I get a new fork. But, one thing about that solution is that as it wears in, you'll still have to worry about the bearing spinning against the inner edge of that spacer if you don't have lots of tension on it. The seal is draggy on that bearing, and you may end up having the bearing not turn, but turn on the axle shaft instead. If that happens, you're going to need to shave a little off your axle shaft to get the tension back. So you've got a great solution. Randy did about the same thing a couple weeks ago. Just make sure the preload is good on the bearings. Tim Wayne Edgerton wrote: > A good friend of mine was down from Iowa this weekend, I'm in the Dallas > area, to help me on my plane. He is a very good A&P and I'm very lucky > to have his help. > > Anyway we discussed the front wheel bushing problems the 10 is having > and here is the solution he suggested to fix the problem and I think > it's a really a good idea. What we did was to take off the nose wheel > fork and we drilled a 1/8inch hole into each side of the fork. We then > inserted roll pins in each of the holes allowing them to protrude > through into the inside by a small amount. We then took the newly > supplied bushings and milled a small grove into the edge of the bushing > which will allow the roll pin on the interior part of the fork to slide > into. This method will definitely stop the bushing from turning. > > I've attached some photos, which I hope will make it easier to > understand. The focus on the pictures wasn't as good as I would have > liked but you will get the idea. If you can't retrieve the photos > because they aren't on the summary distribution just e-mail me if you > would like to see them I will forward them directly to you. > > Wayne Edgerton # 40336 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Nose wheel problem
Date: Aug 30, 2006
From: "Condrey, Bob (US SSA)" <bob.condrey(at)baesystems.com>
Sort of matches what I was told by Tom Green. Big difference is that I had the old axle and they shipped me new spacers without mentioning that the new axle was 1/16" shorter than the old! I had been making the bolt torque per standard spec for that size bolt but without the knowledge of the shortened axle you would never achieve proper fit of all parts. I haven't gotten around to pulling things apart again to trim the axle but have written with red Sharpie on the fork that it has to be done. Thanks for the diligence! Bob -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mike Lauritsen - Work Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 2:08 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Nose wheel problem FYI I just got off the phone with Ken K. the Engineer at Van's and he enlightened me on how the new parts are to be installed on this nose wheel. This may have been covered, but I didn't notice it. First the axle is supposed to be "floating" in between the fork not at such a length that it is compressed by the fork. I was under the impression that it was supposed to be just the right length so that when the spacers were tight against the bearing (causing the bearing to remain stationary) that the axle would then be tight. I saw something about using a feeler gauge and sanding the end of the axle. According to Ken the axle is used to support the bolt and keep the bearings centered, and it's length should be about 1/16" shorter than the sum of the other parts when torqued. Second the entire assembly should be torqued to the torque spec for the bolt that goes through the fork and axle. He says this seems like a lot of torque, but Matco says that it is fine for that bearing and it gives enough pressure for the new spacers to lock on to the bearing. He says the wheel will be draggy, but that is the way it is supposed to be. Again at this point the axle will be floating inside the assembly. The assembly can also be checked simply by re-torqueing during inspection. This method of adjustment skirts the 'this feels about right' method of adjustment. Mike Lauritsen Cleaveland Aircraft Tool 2225 First St. Boone, Iowa 50036 515-432-6794 mike(at)cleavelandtool.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Olson Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 1:23 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Nose wheel problem That's basically what I had said was an excellent solution. I'd do it myself, but with the deep grove worn in my fork, I'm not sure how much I want to drill mine until I get a new fork. But, one thing about that solution is that as it wears in, you'll still have to worry about the bearing spinning against the inner edge of that spacer if you don't have lots of tension on it. The seal is draggy on that bearing, and you may end up having the bearing not turn, but turn on the axle shaft instead. If that happens, you're going to need to shave a little off your axle shaft to get the tension back. So you've got a great solution. Randy did about the same thing a couple weeks ago. Just make sure the preload is good on the bearings. Tim Wayne Edgerton wrote: > A good friend of mine was down from Iowa this weekend, I'm in the Dallas > area, to help me on my plane. He is a very good A&P and I'm very lucky > to have his help. > > Anyway we discussed the front wheel bushing problems the 10 is having > and here is the solution he suggested to fix the problem and I think > it's a really a good idea. What we did was to take off the nose wheel > fork and we drilled a 1/8inch hole into each side of the fork. We then > inserted roll pins in each of the holes allowing them to protrude > through into the inside by a small amount. We then took the newly > supplied bushings and milled a small grove into the edge of the bushing > which will allow the roll pin on the interior part of the fork to slide > into. This method will definitely stop the bushing from turning. > > I've attached some photos, which I hope will make it easier to > understand. The focus on the pictures wasn't as good as I would have > liked but you will get the idea. If you can't retrieve the photos > because they aren't on the summary distribution just e-mail me if you > would like to see them I will forward them directly to you. > > Wayne Edgerton # 40336 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Marcus Cooper" <coop85(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: gretz
Date: Aug 30, 2006
I put an elbow fitting on mine, I was concerned that if I bent it much it might not pass through the mount very well. The tube is just the right length to put an elbow on the end and have the hose pass through the lightening hole. Marcus 40286 flying, and the pitot heat works. _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rob Wright Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 9:42 AM Subject: RV10-List: gretz Wondering if anyone has pictures of how you plumbed your gretz pitot tube. Specifically, did you bend your copper tubing or connect your other line to it with a bend or with an elbow fitting? I'm also using the SafeAir tubing so any help on that would be great too. Rob Wright #392 Wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net>
Subject: Re: Avionics coolingAvionics cooling
Date: Aug 31, 2006
I'm having Stein install avionics cooling fans for my panel but I also have put in a couple of computer fans in the glare shield for defrosting but I think this will also allow for some of the heat coming from the avionics to vent through these holes. I've attached a photo of the holes in my glare shield. The picture was before I installed the fans. I think these holes will also help with the cooling process. Wayne Edgerton #40336 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2006
From: Scott Lewis <rv10(at)tpg.com.au>
Subject: Re: gretz
G'day Rob, Rob Wright wrote: > Wondering if anyone has pictures of how you plumbed your gretz pitot > tube. Specifically, did you bend your copper tubing or connect your > other line to it with a bend or with an elbow fitting? Im also using > the SafeAir tubing so any help on that would be great too. I have the exact setup, haven't installed yet though. I am planning an AN822-4D fitting (Elbow with one pipe thread end) on the end of the Gretz tube which then connects directly to the Safeair tubing. Have fun, Scott Lewis RV-10 40172 Adelaide, South Australia ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rob Wright" <armywrights(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: gretz
Date: Aug 31, 2006
Yeah, thanks. I went with that idea and just got my fitting, nut, and sleeve in today from AS&S. Time to forge ahead with this so I can get the skins fully riveted on. Rob Wright #392 Bottom Wing Skins -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Scott Lewis Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 7:05 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: gretz G'day Rob, Rob Wright wrote: > Wondering if anyone has pictures of how you plumbed your gretz pitot > tube. Specifically, did you bend your copper tubing or connect your > other line to it with a bend or with an elbow fitting? I'm also using > the SafeAir tubing so any help on that would be great too. I have the exact setup, haven't installed yet though. I am planning an AN822-4D fitting (Elbow with one pipe thread end) on the end of the Gretz tube which then connects directly to the Safeair tubing. Have fun, Scott Lewis RV-10 40172 Adelaide, South Australia ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net>
Subject: Re: gretzgretz
Date: Sep 01, 2006
You know for what ever it's worth I also went with the Gretz pitot tube, I liked the idea of the auto on feature, and I installed the controller for it right on the back of the inspection plate right next to where it's mounted. I've attached a picture. I think it will make it very easy to work on if necessary. Also I think the tube is just a tad bit ugly so I call the owner who sells the Gretz unit and ask him if I could paint it and he told me that's not a problem. He said I could sand down the unit to smooth it up a little. I also talked to my paint guy and he said not a problem to paint it. Maybe if I paint it, it will blend into the underside and not look quite so ugly :>} Wayne Edgerton #40336 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jdalton77" <jdalton77(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Anyone actually FLYING with an alternative engine?
Date: Sep 01, 2006
Anything other than a "traditional" aircraft engine. Egg and Crossflow both "claim" that multiple -10 builders have bought their engines. Is anyone flying - or about to fly - with one of these (or another)? Inquiring minds want to know . . . Jeff ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 01, 2006
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: CS Crankshaft end - what's it look like
Reposting since my original post failed to make it...... Fellow listers, I'm trying to determine what the prop end of the crankshaft is supposed to look like when it is set up for a constant speed prop. Folks have written about plugs - but that doesn't tell me what to look for. If it's plugged, should I only see the plug? If it's not plugged, what does the inside look like? FWIW, I'm not seeing 'just a plug' - I'm seeing stuff in there - looks like a bar going across with a notch cut in to it...maybe to allow a tool to get all the way in to the back. Anyone have any drawings or photographs? I know this is one that I don't want to have the wrong way... Thanks, Ralph Capen ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: alternator belt
Date: Sep 01, 2006
MessageSearched the Van's site for the alternator belt for the IO540 with 9.75" pulley. It was not listed but the correct one for their 60a alternator is DAYCO 15355 11A0900 (0167E7?). the last number I don't think it is required. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Belue, Kevin" <KBelue@drs-tem.com>
Subject: CS Crankshaft end - what's it look like
Date: Sep 01, 2006
Ralph, I am not an A&P, but this is based on experience: Hollow Lycoming cranks have two plug locations. If a fixed-pitch prop is used, then a ~ 1.910" plug (Expansion Plug STD-1211) goes in the end of the crank opening with no plug in the back of the crank opening. The front plug is convex and is installed by tapping with a hammer so that it tightens in the hole as it expands. If a constant-speed prop is used, the front plug is not installed but there is a smaller plug installed deep in the back of the crank opening, behind the cross-tube. This plug can be difficult to install because the cross tube must not be damaged. I believe the cross tube is where the pressurized oil from the governor gets to the prop. Some rear plugs have a setscrew-type plug in them so you don't have to remove the whole plug, just the setscrew when you are using a fixed-pitch prop. The front and rear plug should not be installed at the same time, else the oil pressure can build up and blow out the front plug, loosing a lot of oil. Since you see the cross tube, it is setup for a constant-speed prop if the rear plug is installed. I've included a cross-section picture of the crank in this email, but if does not appear you can see it in: Service Bulletin 505B. Kevin D. Belue RV6A ~700 hrs. RV10 finish kit > -----Original Message----- > From: Ralph E. Capen [mailto:recapen(at)earthlink.net] > Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 10:46 AM > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com; rv6-list(at)matronics.com; rv10-list(at)matronics.com; > lycomingengines-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: CS Crankshaft end - what's it look like > > > Reposting since my original post failed to make it...... > > Fellow listers, > > I'm trying to determine what the prop end of the crankshaft is supposed to look > like when it is set up for a constant speed prop. > > Folks have written about plugs - but that doesn't tell me what to look for. > If it's plugged, should I only see the plug? If it's not plugged, what > does the inside look like? > > FWIW, I'm not seeing 'just a plug' - I'm seeing stuff in there - > looks like a bar going across with a notch cut in to it...maybe to allow a tool > to get all the way in to the back. > > Anyone have any drawings or photographs? > > I know this is one that I don't want to have the wrong way... > > Thanks, > Ralph Capen http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">

 

Ralph,

 

I am not an A&P, but this is based on experience:

 

Hollow Lycoming cranks have two plug locations.

 

If a fixed-pitch prop is used, then a ~ 1.910" plug (Expansion Plug STD-1211) goes in the end of the crank opening with no plug in the back of the crank opening. The front plug is convex and is installed by tapping with a hammer so that it tightens in the hole as it expands.

 

If a constant-speed prop is used, the front plug is not installed but there is a smaller plug installed deep in the back of the crank opening, behind the cross-tube. This plug can be difficult to install because the cross tube must not be damaged. I believe the cross tube is where the pressurized oil from the governor gets to the prop.

 

Some rear plugs have a setscrew-type plug in them so you don't have to remove the whole plug, just the setscrew when you are using a fixed-pitch prop.

 

The front and rear plug should not be installed at the same time, else the oil pressure can build up and blow out the front plug, loosing a lot of oil.

 

Since you see the cross tube, it is setup for a constant-speed prop if the rear plug is installed.

 

I've included a cross-section picture of the crank in this email, but if does not appear you can see it in: Service Bulletin 505B.

 

Kevin D. Belue

RV6A ~700 hrs.

RV10 finish kit

 

 

 

 

> -----Original Message-----

> Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 10:46 AM

> To: rv-list(at)matronics.com; rv6-list(at)matronics.com; rv10-list(at)matronics.com;

> lycomingengines-list(at)matronics.com

> Subject: RV10-List: CS Crankshaft end - what's it look like

>

> --> RV10-List message posted by: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>

>

> Reposting since my original post failed to make it......

>

> Fellow listers,

>

> I'm trying to determine what the prop end of the crankshaft is supposed to look

> like when it is set up for a constant speed prop.

>

> Folks have written about plugs - but that doesn't tell me what to look for.

> If it's plugged, should I only see the plug?  If it's not plugged, what

> does the inside look like?

>

> FWIW, I'm not seeing 'just a plug' - I'm seeing stuff in there -

> looks like a bar going across with a notch cut in to it...maybe to allow a tool

> to get all the way in to the back.

>

> Anyone have any drawings or photographs?

>

> I know this is one that I don't want to have the wrong way...

>

> Thanks,

> Ralph Capen

 

________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 01, 2006
From: <rickgray(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: CS Crankshaft end - what's it look like
Correct on 'most' of this. Clarification: the 'crossover' tube is NOT where the oil from the govenor enters the crank.....that oil is introduced forward of the crossover tube.....you can see the hole if you look inside of the crank (if it's set up for C/S). The crossover tube, also called a 'slinger' tube or a 'sludge' tube is where oil that seeps through the large front bearing #1/#2 ends up. The tube is slightly off center....the oil enters from both ends of the tube from the surrounding bearing and is eventually thrown out of the CENTER of the tube where centrifugal force will throw any impurities to the inner sidewall of the hollow crankshaft....and the oil will run back down the shaft into the sump. If/when you remove a prop for conversion or whatever you'll typically see a buildup of sludge in this area....don't be alarmed.....just make a little 'hoe' out of some soft .020 and drag it out then clean things up. Hope this helps. Rick in Ohio at the Buffalo Farm - Ohio Valley RVators - too many RV's to list http://rv6rick.tripod.com/ohiovalleyrvators/ > > Ralph, > > > > I am not an A&P, but this is based on experience: > > > > Hollow Lycoming cranks have two plug locations. > > > > If a fixed-pitch prop is used, then a ~ 1.910" plug (Expansion Plug > STD-1211) goes in the end of the crank opening with no plug in the back of > the crank opening. The front plug is convex and is installed by tapping with > a hammer so that it tightens in the hole as it expands. > > > > If a constant-speed prop is used, the front plug is not installed but there > is a smaller plug installed deep in the back of the crank opening, behind > the cross-tube. This plug can be difficult to install because the cross tube > must not be damaged. I believe the cross tube is where the pressurized oil > from the governor gets to the prop. > > > > Some rear plugs have a setscrew-type plug in them so you don't have to > remove the whole plug, just the setscrew when you are using a fixed-pitch > prop. > > > > The front and rear plug should not be installed at the same time, else the > oil pressure can build up and blow out the front plug, loosing a lot of oil. > > > > Since you see the cross tube, it is setup for a constant-speed prop if the > rear plug is installed. > > > > I've included a cross-section picture of the crank in this email, but if > does not appear you can see it in: Service Bulletin 505B. > > > > Kevin D. Belue > > RV6A ~700 hrs. > > RV10 finish kit > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Ralph E. Capen [mailto:recapen(at)earthlink.net] > > > Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 10:46 AM > > > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com; rv6-list(at)matronics.com; > rv10-list(at)matronics.com; > > > lycomingengines-list(at)matronics.com > > > Subject: RV10-List: CS Crankshaft end - what's it look like > > > > > > > > > > Reposting since my original post failed to make it...... > > > > > > Fellow listers, > > > > > > I'm trying to determine what the prop end of the crankshaft is supposed to > look > > > like when it is set up for a constant speed prop. > > > > > > Folks have written about plugs - but that doesn't tell me what to look > for. > > > If it's plugged, should I only see the plug? If it's not plugged, what > > > does the inside look like? > > > > > > FWIW, I'm not seeing 'just a plug' - I'm seeing stuff in there - > > > looks like a bar going across with a notch cut in to it...maybe to allow a > tool > > > to get all the way in to the back. > > > > > > Anyone have any drawings or photographs? > > > > > > I know this is one that I don't want to have the wrong way... > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Ralph Capen > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 01, 2006
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: CS Crankshaft end - what's it look like
Thanks Kevin! -----Original Message----- >From: "Belue, Kevin" <KBelue@drs-tem.com> >Sent: Sep 1, 2006 1:53 PM >To: "'rv10-list(at)matronics.com'" >Subject: RE: RV10-List: CS Crankshaft end - what's it look like > > > >Ralph, > > > >I am not an A&P, but this is based on experience: > > > >Hollow Lycoming cranks have two plug locations. > > > >If a fixed-pitch prop is used, then a ~ 1.910" plug (Expansion Plug >STD-1211) goes in the end of the crank opening with no plug in the back of >the crank opening. The front plug is convex and is installed by tapping with >a hammer so that it tightens in the hole as it expands. > > > >If a constant-speed prop is used, the front plug is not installed but there >is a smaller plug installed deep in the back of the crank opening, behind >the cross-tube. This plug can be difficult to install because the cross tube >must not be damaged. I believe the cross tube is where the pressurized oil >from the governor gets to the prop. > > > >Some rear plugs have a setscrew-type plug in them so you don't have to >remove the whole plug, just the setscrew when you are using a fixed-pitch >prop. > > > >The front and rear plug should not be installed at the same time, else the >oil pressure can build up and blow out the front plug, loosing a lot of oil. > > > >Since you see the cross tube, it is setup for a constant-speed prop if the >rear plug is installed. > > > >I've included a cross-section picture of the crank in this email, but if >does not appear you can see it in: Service Bulletin 505B. > > > >Kevin D. Belue > >RV6A ~700 hrs. > >RV10 finish kit > > > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Ralph E. Capen [mailto:recapen(at)earthlink.net] > >> Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 10:46 AM > >> To: rv-list(at)matronics.com; rv6-list(at)matronics.com; >rv10-list(at)matronics.com; > >> lycomingengines-list(at)matronics.com > >> Subject: RV10-List: CS Crankshaft end - what's it look like > >> > > >> > >> Reposting since my original post failed to make it...... > >> > >> Fellow listers, > >> > >> I'm trying to determine what the prop end of the crankshaft is supposed to >look > >> like when it is set up for a constant speed prop. > >> > >> Folks have written about plugs - but that doesn't tell me what to look >for. > >> If it's plugged, should I only see the plug? If it's not plugged, what > >> does the inside look like? > >> > >> FWIW, I'm not seeing 'just a plug' - I'm seeing stuff in there - > >> looks like a bar going across with a notch cut in to it...maybe to allow a >tool > >> to get all the way in to the back. > >> > >> Anyone have any drawings or photographs? > >> > >> I know this is one that I don't want to have the wrong way... > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Ralph Capen > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 01, 2006
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: CS Crankshaft end - what's it look like
Thanks Rick! -----Original Message----- >From: rickgray(at)adelphia.net >Sent: Sep 1, 2006 2:16 PM >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RE: RV10-List: CS Crankshaft end - what's it look like > > >Correct on 'most' of this. >Clarification: the 'crossover' tube is NOT where the oil from the govenor enters the crank.....that oil is introduced forward of the crossover tube.....you can see the hole if you look inside of the crank (if it's set up for C/S). The crossover tube, also called a 'slinger' tube or a 'sludge' tube is where oil that seeps through the large front bearing #1/#2 ends up. The tube is slightly off center....the oil enters from both ends of the tube from the surrounding bearing and is eventually thrown out of the CENTER of the tube where centrifugal force will throw any impurities to the inner sidewall of the hollow crankshaft....and the oil will run back down the shaft into the sump. If/when you remove a prop for conversion or whatever you'll typically see a buildup of sludge in this area....don't be alarmed.....just make a little 'hoe' out of some soft .020 and drag it out then clean things up. > >Hope this helps. > >Rick in Ohio at the Buffalo Farm - Ohio Valley RVators - too many RV's to list >http://rv6rick.tripod.com/ohiovalleyrvators/ > > >> >> Ralph, >> >> >> >> I am not an A&P, but this is based on experience: >> >> >> >> Hollow Lycoming cranks have two plug locations. >> >> >> >> If a fixed-pitch prop is used, then a ~ 1.910" plug (Expansion Plug >> STD-1211) goes in the end of the crank opening with no plug in the back of >> the crank opening. The front plug is convex and is installed by tapping with >> a hammer so that it tightens in the hole as it expands. >> >> >> >> If a constant-speed prop is used, the front plug is not installed but there >> is a smaller plug installed deep in the back of the crank opening, behind >> the cross-tube. This plug can be difficult to install because the cross tube >> must not be damaged. I believe the cross tube is where the pressurized oil >> from the governor gets to the prop. >> >> >> >> Some rear plugs have a setscrew-type plug in them so you don't have to >> remove the whole plug, just the setscrew when you are using a fixed-pitch >> prop. >> >> >> >> The front and rear plug should not be installed at the same time, else the >> oil pressure can build up and blow out the front plug, loosing a lot of oil. >> >> >> >> Since you see the cross tube, it is setup for a constant-speed prop if the >> rear plug is installed. >> >> >> >> I've included a cross-section picture of the crank in this email, but if >> does not appear you can see it in: Service Bulletin 505B. >> >> >> >> Kevin D. Belue >> >> RV6A ~700 hrs. >> >> RV10 finish kit >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> >> > From: Ralph E. Capen [mailto:recapen(at)earthlink.net] >> >> > Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 10:46 AM >> >> > To: rv-list(at)matronics.com; rv6-list(at)matronics.com; >> rv10-list(at)matronics.com; >> >> > lycomingengines-list(at)matronics.com >> >> > Subject: RV10-List: CS Crankshaft end - what's it look like >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > Reposting since my original post failed to make it...... >> >> > >> >> > Fellow listers, >> >> > >> >> > I'm trying to determine what the prop end of the crankshaft is supposed to >> look >> >> > like when it is set up for a constant speed prop. >> >> > >> >> > Folks have written about plugs - but that doesn't tell me what to look >> for. >> >> > If it's plugged, should I only see the plug? If it's not plugged, what >> >> > does the inside look like? >> >> > >> >> > FWIW, I'm not seeing 'just a plug' - I'm seeing stuff in there - >> >> > looks like a bar going across with a notch cut in to it...maybe to allow a >> tool >> >> > to get all the way in to the back. >> >> > >> >> > Anyone have any drawings or photographs? >> >> > >> >> > I know this is one that I don't want to have the wrong way... >> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > Ralph Capen >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Anyone actually FLYING with an alternative engine?
Date: Sep 02, 2006
From: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR(at)wernerco.com>
Eggenfellner has not shipped it to me yet, but I will be flying 3-4 months after I get it. Dan 40269 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of jdalton77 Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 10:59 AM Subject: RV10-List: Anyone actually FLYING with an alternative engine? Anything other than a "traditional" aircraft engine. Egg and Crossflow both "claim" that multiple -10 builders have bought their engines. Is anyone flying - or about to fly - with one of these (or another)? Inquiring minds want to know . . . Jeff ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 04, 2006
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Hello?
Hey RV10'ers, There hasn't been a post since Friday and I'm wondering where all the traffic went...? Lots of RV guys are probably at Van's Homecoming this weekend, but there got to be a couple of us still hanging around the hanger... Matt ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Sargeant" <k5wiv(at)amsat.org>
Subject: Hello?
Date: Sep 04, 2006
I've been wondering the same thing. Not much traffic on the -7 or -9 groups either. Jack & Cecilia Sargeant 1127 Patricia St. Wichita, KS 67208-2642 316/683-5268 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Matt Dralle Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 1:07 PM Subject: RV10-List: Hello? Hey RV10'ers, There hasn't been a post since Friday and I'm wondering where all the traffic went...? Lots of RV guys are probably at Van's Homecoming this weekend, but there got to be a couple of us still hanging around the hanger... Matt ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jdalton77" <jdalton77(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines,
primer, and painting?
Date: Sep 04, 2006
H aha ha. Seriously, any way to not spend 40k on an engine? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 04, 2006
From: James Hein <n8vim(at)arrl.net>
Subject: Re: alternative engines
I'll bite! I'm in the same position, that is I can't see spending $40k for a new engine, so I'm about 80% sure at this point I'm going to go with the Eggenfellner Subaru engine (H6) on my -10. I recently had an impressive ground demonstration (weather sucked for flying) of an RV-9A with the Egg 4-cylinder engine on it. Very impressive to say the least. Very quiet, lots of torque, and smooth... very smooth... As an engineer, I like the liquid cooling since tolerances can be much closer in the engine (and hence, less oil burning), etc. I won't need an engine for 2-3 years (due to financial reasons), so I'm keeping my options open right now. As for primer, I'm Alodining and Epoxy priming (PPG DP50LF) everything I can. My plane won't be a hangar queen with what I get paid around here! :) I am lucky in one respect though; Here in taxachusetts, would you beleive there is NO tax on airplanes or airplane parts? This is my opinion; What's yours? -Jim 40384, Drilling bottom wing skins... jdalton77 wrote: > H aha ha. > > Seriously, any way to not spend 40k on an engine? > >* > > >* > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Albert Gardner" <ibspud(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Engines?
Date: Sep 04, 2006
I have located an IO-540-M1B5D. It has several aspects that need to be changed to make it suitable for an RV-10. It has up exhaust, rear air intake, and the dual mag setup but my plan was to get a serviceable case and crank and then put new cylinder assemblies on it. I am assuming I can then get the correct sump to move the air intake forward and maybe even a different accessory cover to allow separate mags. If the case and crank are good, this might be a pretty good deal since there is a Hartzell 3 blade included. Has anyone had any success with changing sumps and/or accessory drive covers on a similar engine? Albert Gardner Yuma, AZ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <millstees(at)ameritech.net>
Subject: Re: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative
engines, primer, and painting?
Date: Sep 04, 2006
I am going with the Eggenfellner H-6 turbocharged on my -10. I will be receiving the engine in November, and am going to Florida for a demo ride in Jan's H-6 equipped RV this coming weekend. The cost is $25K firewall forward. Yes, I have heard all the negative press, but seems to me, that there are lots of advantages that offset the minor loss in horsepower, and that minor loss goes away at higher altitudes because of the turbocharging. And, all those people who are criticizing the engine, for the most part, have not flown it. Steve Mills 40486 fuselage, Naperville Illinois ----- Original Message ----- From: jdalton77 To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 4:06 PM Subject: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? H aha ha. Seriously, any way to not spend 40k on an engine? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Evan and Megan Johnson" <evmeg(at)snowcrest.net>
Subject: Re: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative
engines, primer, and painting?
Date: Sep 04, 2006
as far as I can tell the Eggenfellner Subaru seems to be the best choice.....I really wish those clowns at Honda would go ahead with their program, it looked really promising. Evan ----- Original Message ----- From: jdalton77 To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 2:06 PM Subject: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? H aha ha. Seriously, any way to not spend 40k on an engine? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Albert Gardner" <ibspud(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Engines?
Date: Sep 04, 2006
I am reposting this note because it didn't have any end-of-line indicators when I downloaded it and was very hard to read. So here goes-again: I have located an IO-540-M1B5D. It has several aspects that need to be changed to make it suitable for an RV-10. It has up exhaust, rear air intake, and the dual mag setup but my plan was to get a serviceable case and crank and then put new cylinder assemblies on it. I am assuming I can then get the correct sump to move the air intake forward and maybe even a different accessory cover to allow separate mags. If the case and crank are good, this might be a pretty good deal since there is a Hartzell 3 blade included. Has anyone had any success with changing sumps and/or accessory drive covers on a similar engine? Albert Gardner Yuma, AZ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative
engines, primer, and painting?
Date: Sep 04, 2006
From: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR(at)wernerco.com>
You could spend $25K on an Eggenfellner... Dan RV10E 40269 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of jdalton77 Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 5:06 PM Subject: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? H aha ha. Seriously, any way to not spend 40k on an engine? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jdalton77" <jdalton77(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: alternative engines
Date: Sep 04, 2006
Nice to hear "Taxachusettes" isn't. It's hard to tell with all the campaign commercial - but you're comments tell another story - at least regarding airplanes. We're not so lucky here in MI with 6%. I'm leaning toward Egg myself. We'll have to see what happens when a few of his engines fly in RV-10's by the end of the year. I hear there are a few being delivered in October. I'm priming interior and exterior using rattle-can self-etching primer for the small parts before assembly and POR-15 Self-Etching primer for the exterior and assembled parts inside. So far it's worked out really well - though a bit pricey at $145/gallon. ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Hein" <n8vim(at)arrl.net> Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 5:35 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: alternative engines > > I'll bite! > I'm in the same position, that is I can't see spending $40k for a new > engine, so I'm about 80% sure at this point I'm going to go with the > Eggenfellner Subaru engine (H6) on my -10. > > I recently had an impressive ground demonstration (weather sucked for > flying) of an RV-9A with the Egg 4-cylinder engine on it. Very impressive > to say the least. Very quiet, lots of torque, and smooth... very smooth... > > As an engineer, I like the liquid cooling since tolerances can be much > closer in the engine (and hence, less oil burning), etc. > > I won't need an engine for 2-3 years (due to financial reasons), so I'm > keeping my options open right now. > > As for primer, I'm Alodining and Epoxy priming (PPG DP50LF) everything > I can. My plane won't be a hangar queen with what I get paid around here! > :) I am lucky in one respect though; Here in taxachusetts, would you > beleive there is NO tax on airplanes or airplane parts? > > This is my opinion; What's yours? > > -Jim 40384, Drilling bottom wing skins... > > jdalton77 wrote: > >> H aha ha. >> Seriously, any way to not spend 40k on an engine? >> >>* >> >> >>* >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jdalton77" <jdalton77(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative
engines, primer, and painting?
Date: Sep 04, 2006
I agree with your assessment. I'm looking forward to hearing how it flies and how your demo flight goes. It will be interesting to hear how 220HP flies in the -10. ----- Original Message ----- From: millstees(at)ameritech.net To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 5:56 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? I am going with the Eggenfellner H-6 turbocharged on my -10. I will be receiving the engine in November, and am going to Florida for a demo ride in Jan's H-6 equipped RV this coming weekend. The cost is $25K firewall forward. Yes, I have heard all the negative press, but seems to me, that there are lots of advantages that offset the minor loss in horsepower, and that minor loss goes away at higher altitudes because of the turbocharging. And, all those people who are criticizing the engine, for the most part, have not flown it. Steve Mills 40486 fuselage, Naperville Illinois ----- Original Message ----- From: jdalton77 To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 4:06 PM Subject: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? H aha ha. Seriously, any way to not spend 40k on an engine? s.com/Navigator?RV10-List ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jdalton77" <jdalton77(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Engines?
Date: Sep 04, 2006
I've heard that Barrett Precision Engines has done this. They have a web site. ----- Original Message ----- From: Albert Gardner To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 8:01 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Engines? I am reposting this note because it didn't have any end-of-line indicators when I downloaded it and was very hard to read. So here goes-again:I have located an IO-540-M1B5D. It has several aspects that need to be changed to make it suitable for an RV-10. It has up exhaust, rear air intake, and the dual magsetup but my plan was to get a serviceable case and crank and then put new cylinder assemblies on it. I am assuming I can then get the correct sump to move the airintake forward and maybe even a different accessory cover to allow separate mags. If the case and crank are good, this might be a pretty good deal since there is a Hartzell 3 blade included. Has anyone had any success with changing sumps and/or accessory drive covers on a similar engine?Albert GardnerYuma, AZ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Alisia Campbell" <alisiakay(at)msn.com>
Subject: Please Unsubscribe me!!!
Date: Sep 04, 2006
Unsubscribe!!!! ----- Original Message ----- From: RV10-List Digest Server Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 2:17 AM Subject: RV10-List Digest: 0 Msgs - 09/03/06 * ======================== Online Versions of Today's List Digest Archive ======================== Today's complete RV10-List Digest can also be found in either of the two Web Links listed below. The .html file includes the Digest formatted in HTML for viewing with a web browser and features Hyperlinked Indexes and Message Navigation. The .txt file includes the plain ASCII version of the RV10-List Digest and can be viewed with a generic text editor such as Notepad or with a web browser. HTML Version: http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list/Digest.RV10-List.2006-09-03 .html Text Version: http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list/Digest.RV10-List.2006-09-03 .txt ====================== EMail Version of Today's List Digest Archive ====================== ---------------------------------------------------------- RV10-List Digest Archive --- Total Messages Posted Sun 09/03/06: 0 ---------------------------------------------------------- Today's Message Index: ---------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Albert Gardner" <ibspud(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Please Unsubscribe me!!!
Date: Sep 04, 2006
At the bottom of every message is self-service instructions! Unsubscribe!!!! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DAVE LEIKAM" <DAVELEIKAM(at)wi.rr.com>
Subject: Re: alternative engines
Date: Sep 04, 2006
I have not primed a thing yet. Currently working on elevators. I plan to take assembled empennage parts to a local coating shop and have them alodined. The exterior will be primed before paint of course. I'm waiting until I am ready to order an engine before trying to decide on one. There are so many choices, I am just watching, listening and learning now. Dave Leikam Muskego, WI N89DA #40496 elevators ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Hein" <n8vim(at)arrl.net> Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 4:35 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: alternative engines > > I'll bite! > I'm in the same position, that is I can't see spending $40k for a new > engine, so I'm about 80% sure at this point I'm going to go with the > Eggenfellner Subaru engine (H6) on my -10. > > I recently had an impressive ground demonstration (weather sucked for > flying) of an RV-9A with the Egg 4-cylinder engine on it. Very impressive > to say the least. Very quiet, lots of torque, and smooth... very smooth... > > As an engineer, I like the liquid cooling since tolerances can be much > closer in the engine (and hence, less oil burning), etc. > > I won't need an engine for 2-3 years (due to financial reasons), so I'm > keeping my options open right now. > > As for primer, I'm Alodining and Epoxy priming (PPG DP50LF) everything > I can. My plane won't be a hangar queen with what I get paid around here! > :) I am lucky in one respect though; Here in taxachusetts, would you > beleive there is NO tax on airplanes or airplane parts? > > This is my opinion; What's yours? > > -Jim 40384, Drilling bottom wing skins... > > jdalton77 wrote: > >> H aha ha. >> Seriously, any way to not spend 40k on an engine? >> >>* >> >> >>* >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ben Westfall" <rv10(at)sinkrate.com>
Subject: Static port question
Date: Sep 04, 2006
Does anyone have any pictures of how they ran their static port tubing? Did you drill out holes for bushings in the ribs and what size did you use? I went with the Van's pop-rivet kit because I never got around to researching anything else and the time has come to install. Any pointers would be appreciated. -Ben Westfall #40579 Tailcone. still ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 04, 2006
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Engines?
BPE has a cold air induction system for the IO-540 which replaces the old sump and intake manifolds. Deems jdalton77 wrote: > I've heard that Barrett Precision Engines has done this. They have a > web site. > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Albert Gardner > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com > *Sent:* Monday, September 04, 2006 8:01 PM > *Subject:* RE: RV10-List: Engines? > >*I am reposting this note because it didnt have any end-of-line indicators when I downloaded it and was very hard to read. So here goes-again:* > >*I have located an IO-540-M1B5D. It has several aspects that need to be changed to * > >*make it suitable for an RV-10. It has up exhaust, rear air intake, and the dual mag* > >*setup but my plan was to get a serviceable case and crank and then put new cylinder * > >*assemblies on it. I am assuming I can then get the correct sump to move the air* > >*intake forward and maybe even a different accessory cover to allow separate mags. * > >*If the case and crank are good, this might be a pretty good deal since there is a * > >*Hartzell 3 blade included. Has anyone had any success with changing sumps and/or * > >*accessory drive covers on a similar engine?* > >*Albert Gardner* > >*Yuma, AZ * > >* * > > > >* > >s.com/Navigator?RV10-List > >* > >* > > >* > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2006
From: "David M." <ainut(at)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: Anyone actually FLYING with an alternative engine?
There are several Mustang II's that are flying with engines originally destined for automobiles. David M. jdalton77 wrote: > Anything other than a "traditional" aircraft engine. Egg and > Crossflow both "claim" that multiple -10 builders have bought their > engines. > > Is anyone flying - or about to fly - with one of these (or another)? > > Inquiring minds want to know . . . > > Jeff > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: intake alternate air
Date: Sep 05, 2006
For those operating the IO540 D4A5, are you installing both hinged alternate door on the front of the box and the emergency air door on the bottom of the box? ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: intake alternate air
Date: Sep 05, 2006
From: "Doerr, Ray R [NTK]" <Ray.R.Doerr(at)sprint.com>
I just installed the one on the bottom of the Box. This is just in case the air filter is blocked by ice or anything else. Thank You Ray Doerr N519RV (40250) 125 hours. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of David McNeill Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 12:05 PM Subject: RV10-List: intake alternate air For those operating the IO540 D4A5, are you installing both hinged alternate door on the front of the box and the emergency air door on the bottom of the box? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2006
From: Bill DeRouchey <billderou(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Static port question
Sorry no pictures - but - I believe the only critical item is routing both ports up to the highest point on the nearest bulkhead and then tee off for a single run to the panel. This will drain the water back out the port and not into the instrumentation. It would also be a good idea to perform a leak test and a flying test. Without a correct static port no instrumentation on your panel can be be accurate. A simple flying test, derived from a very few observations, is to open your static line inside the cockpit during a flight. The altitude should increase 200 feet (or so). If it decreases then your static port is drawing a vacuum and your airspeeds will be incorrectly low and your altitudes high. Bill DeRouchey N939SB, Flying billderou(at)yahoo.com Ben Westfall wrote: Does anyone have any pictures of how they ran their static port tubing? Did you drill out holes for bushings in the ribs and what size did you use? I went with the Vans pop-rivet kit because I never got around to researching anything else and the time has come to install. Any pointers would be appreciated. -Ben Westfall #40579 Tailcone still ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2006
From: Tom Gesele <tgesele(at)optonline.net>
Subject: Airflow Performance Purge Line
Can anyone with an airflow performance fuel injection system installed on the -10 tell me where they penetrated the firewall for the purge line. I'm planning on installing a 45 deg bulkhead fitting in the same location (opposite side) as the fitting for the fuel line and want to ensure there are no interference issues with running the purge line from there. Also, if anyone has a picture of the setup from the engine side that they could forward, I'd appreciate it. Thanks, Tom Gesele #473 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Avidyne TAS600
Date: Sep 05, 2006
From: "Chris Johnston" <CJohnston(at)popsound.com>
Hey all - I'm considering putting the TAS600 active traffic system into my 10, so I called up Avidyne and asked if they have an install kit that you can buy. I'm working on the fuse, so now would be the time to install the antennas and such. Also, it splits up the investment into a couple smaller payments that don't look quite so bad. The part number for the kit with all antennas and tray is 71-2026 for anyone else who is interested. It's $3055 according to the guy at Avidyne. Total cost for the system is $9900. My question is - the sales rep said something about having to have an IA inspect the install of the unit, or do the install. Really? He said something like "it's the same thing you have to do after you install your chelton..." Really? Someone has to inspect my installation of my avionics? I certainly don't pretend to be very knowledgeable about what's required legally when you build, but I'd have thought I would have heard a bit about that. Anyone have any thoughts about this? cj #40410 (con)fuse(ed) www.perfectlygoodairplane.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chris , Susie Darcy" <VHMUM(at)bigpond.com>
Subject: Re: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative
engines, primer, and painting?
Date: Sep 06, 2006
Yes we cannot aford 40 grand so we are going with an overhauled engine saving about 15 grand! Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: jdalton77 To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 10:31 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? I agree with your assessment. I'm looking forward to hearing how it flies and how your demo flight goes. It will be interesting to hear how 220HP flies in the -10. ----- Original Message ----- From: millstees(at)ameritech.net To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 5:56 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? I am going with the Eggenfellner H-6 turbocharged on my -10. I will be receiving the engine in November, and am going to Florida for a demo ride in Jan's H-6 equipped RV this coming weekend. The cost is $25K firewall forward. Yes, I have heard all the negative press, but seems to me, that there are lots of advantages that offset the minor loss in horsepower, and that minor loss goes away at higher altitudes because of the turbocharging. And, all those people who are criticizing the engine, for the most part, have not flown it. Steve Mills 40486 fuselage, Naperville Illinois ----- Original Message ----- From: jdalton77 To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 4:06 PM Subject: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? H aha ha. Seriously, any way to not spend 40k on an engine? s.com/Navigator?RV10-List s.com/Navigator?RV10-List ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jdalton77" <jdalton77(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Static port question
Date: Sep 05, 2006
Since we're on the static port question, and for those of you in the know, is there any significant reason, other than appearance, to go with the SafeAir vs. the Vans "pop rivet?" For those who have installed the Cleveland, how about that one. It sure looks nice and it's a lot cheaper than the SafeAir. ----- Original Message ----- From: Bill DeRouchey To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 3:11 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Static port question Sorry no pictures - but - I believe the only critical item is routing both ports up to the highest point on the nearest bulkhead and then tee off for a single run to the panel. This will drain the water back out the port and not into the instrumentation. It would also be a good idea to perform a leak test and a flying test. Without a correct static port no instrumentation on your panel can be be accurate. A simple flying test, derived from a very few observations, is to open your static line inside the cockpit during a flight. The altitude should increase 200 feet (or so). If it decreases then your static port is drawing a vacuum and your airspeeds will be incorrectly low and your altitudes high. Bill DeRouchey N939SB, Flying billderou(at)yahoo.com Ben Westfall wrote: Does anyone have any pictures of how they ran their static port tubing? Did you drill out holes for bushings in the ribs and what size did you use? I went with the Van's pop-rivet kit because I never got around to researching anything else and the time has come to install. Any pointers would be appreciated. -Ben Westfall --> http://forums.matronics.com http://wiki.matronics.com =========== ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jdalton77" <jdalton77(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative
engines, primer, and painting?
Date: Sep 05, 2006
I wish I knew how to do that - I'm not an engine junkie. I can do the rest, including all the electronics no problem, but I'm no expert with a piston. ----- Original Message ----- From: Chris , Susie Darcy To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 5:38 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? Yes we cannot aford 40 grand so we are going with an overhauled engine saving about 15 grand! Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: jdalton77 To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 10:31 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? I agree with your assessment. I'm looking forward to hearing how it flies and how your demo flight goes. It will be interesting to hear how 220HP flies in the -10. ----- Original Message ----- From: millstees(at)ameritech.net To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 5:56 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? I am going with the Eggenfellner H-6 turbocharged on my -10. I will be receiving the engine in November, and am going to Florida for a demo ride in Jan's H-6 equipped RV this coming weekend. The cost is $25K firewall forward. Yes, I have heard all the negative press, but seems to me, that there are lots of advantages that offset the minor loss in horsepower, and that minor loss goes away at higher altitudes because of the turbocharging. And, all those people who are criticizing the engine, for the most part, have not flown it. Steve Mills 40486 fuselage, Naperville Illinois ----- Original Message ----- From: jdalton77 To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 4:06 PM Subject: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? H aha ha. Seriously, any way to not spend 40k on an engine? s.com/Navigator?RV10-List s.com/Navigator?RV10-List s.com/Navigator?RV10-List ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Kraus" <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net>
Subject: Airflow Performance Purge Line
Date: Sep 05, 2006
Just did this last week. I ran a second 45 degree fitting below the current fuel 45 fitting on the firewall. Ran the line down the right side of the tunnel, and put in a 90 degree bend into the left tank line. I plan on Adel clamping the line to the right side wall of the tunnel soon. I also had to finagle a #4 line into a #6 line with some fitting magic, but it was no big deal (the purge line is #4). -Mike Kraus -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tom Gesele Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 3:33 PM Subject: RV10-List: Airflow Performance Purge Line Can anyone with an airflow performance fuel injection system installed on the -10 tell me where they penetrated the firewall for the purge line. I'm planning on installing a 45 deg bulkhead fitting in the same location (opposite side) as the fitting for the fuel line and want to ensure there are no interference issues with running the purge line from there. Also, if anyone has a picture of the setup from the engine side that they could forward, I'd appreciate it. Thanks, Tom Gesele #473 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2006
From: rv10builder <rv10builder(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Airflow Performance Purge Line
Here is how I routed mine... http://www.mykitlog.com/users/display_log.php?user=rv10builder&project=7&category=501&log=15056&row=19 Brian 40308 Tom Gesele wrote: > > Can anyone with an airflow performance fuel injection system installed on > the -10 tell me where they penetrated the firewall for the purge line. I'm > planning on installing a 45 deg bulkhead fitting in the same location > (opposite side) as the fitting for the fuel line and want to ensure there > are no interference issues with running the purge line from there. Also, if > anyone has a picture of the setup from the engine side that they could > forward, I'd appreciate it. > > Thanks, > Tom Gesele #473 > > > > . > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jesse Saint" <jesse(at)itecusa.org>
Subject: intake alternate air
Date: Sep 05, 2006
We've done both and haven't used either in over 300 hours of flying yet, but haven't had an emergency yet. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse(at)itecusa.org www.itecusa.org W: 352-465-4545 C: 352-427-0285 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of David McNeill Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 1:05 PM Subject: RV10-List: intake alternate air For those operating the IO540 D4A5, are you installing both hinged alternate door on the front of the box and the emergency air door on the bottom of the box? -- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2006
From: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Static port question
*You can see how Deems the static tubing here <http://www.deemsrv10.com/album/Sec%2035%20Access%20covers%20and%20Floor%20panels/index.html> look at pictures DSC03048, 49 & 50. * ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2006
From: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Matco Parking Break Installation
Many have installed the Matco parking break valve on the inside of the firewall like Deemes <http://www.deemsrv10.com/album/Sec%2036%20Brake%20Lines/slides/DSC02527.html> William <http://wcurtis.nerv10.com/08fuselage/fuselage03w.html> Scott <http://scottandranae.smugmug.com/gallery/425029/2/17824900> Has anyone routed / connected up the control cable yet? How did you do it? Any pictures? -- Larry Rosen RV-10 #356 http://lrosen.nerv10.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rob Wright" <armywrights(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative
engines, primer, and painting?
Date: Sep 05, 2006
How about $32K for a first run IO-540 with new cylinders, EIS ignition, and overhaul? Rob Wright #392 Closed up Left Wing tonight... _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of jdalton77 Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 4:06 PM Subject: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? H aha ha. Seriously, any way to not spend 40k on an engine? ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Avidyne TAS600
Date: Sep 06, 2006
From: "Tim Dawson-Townsend" <Tdawson(at)avidyne.com>
Chris: I concur with Tim. Do you have the name of who you talked to? I'll be sure to set them straight . . . We've got a TAS system going in our -10 and Debbie Dewey's already got one flying, I think . . . Tim D-T 40025 ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com on behalf of Chris Johnston Sent: Tue 9/5/2006 5:09 PM Subject: RV10-List: Avidyne TAS600 Hey all - I'm considering putting the TAS600 active traffic system into my 10, so I called up Avidyne and asked if they have an install kit that you can buy. I'm working on the fuse, so now would be the time to install the antennas and such. Also, it splits up the investment into a couple smaller payments that don't look quite so bad. The part number for the kit with all antennas and tray is 71-2026 for anyone else who is interested. It's $3055 according to the guy at Avidyne. Total cost for the system is $9900. My question is - the sales rep said something about having to have an IA inspect the install of the unit, or do the install. Really? He said something like "it's the same thing you have to do after you install your chelton..." Really? Someone has to inspect my installation of my avionics? I certainly don't pretend to be very knowledgeable about what's required legally when you build, but I'd have thought I would have heard a bit about that. Anyone have any thoughts about this? cj #40410 (con)fuse(ed) www.perfectlygoodairplane.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Albert Gardner" <ibspud(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Matco Parking Break Installation
Date: Sep 05, 2006
Here is one way. The kit included a bracket for the TruTrak pitch servo that didn't work as well as the one TruTrak provided with the pitch servo they sent me so I used it to make the bracket that holds the push/pull cable that those excellent guys at Spruce sent me. Albert Gardner RV-10 #422 Yuma, AZ Many have installed the Matco parking break valve on the inside of the firewall Has anyone routed / connected up the control cable yet? How did you do it? Any pictures? Larry Rosen RV-10 #356 http://lrosen.nerv10.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2006
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Birthday boy
Rumor has it that Rick Sked ce;ebrated a borthday today! Happy B'Day Rick !!!! Deems ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2006
From: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Matco Parking Brake (Break) Installation
Thanks Albert. For you old timers sorry about the James McClow. Albert Gardner wrote: > Here is one way. The kit included a bracket for the TruTrak pitch servo that > didn't work as well as the one TruTrak provided with the pitch servo they > sent me so I used it to make the bracket that holds the push/pull cable that > those excellent guys at Spruce sent me. > Albert Gardner > RV-10 #422 > Yuma, AZ > > Many have installed the Matco parking break valve on the inside of the > firewall Has anyone routed / connected up the control cable yet? > How did you do it? Any pictures? > Larry Rosen > RV-10 #356 > http://lrosen.nerv10.com > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2006
From: Rick <ricksked(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Birthday boy
Thanks Deem's!! Yup I did. Rick S. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2006
From: pilotdds(at)aol.com
Subject: Converting fixed pitch to constant speed
Could any of you folks knowledgable about the conversion advise me if external oil lines are necesary when making this conversion.My understanding is that the outside plug must be removed a 1/8 plug must be placed inside the crankshaft and external oil lines are necesary for rear mounte governors but not front mounted type. Is this correct? 728dd-flying ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2006
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: ATG goes w/ Op Tech
FYI, Another vendor just made Op Tech their EFIS. Here's a link from Aero News announcing ATG's decision to make Op Tech their Glass panel vendor: http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?ContentBlockID=98e9caf0-593b-4468-9030-528ee62b8329&#d Deems Davis # 406 Wiring Op Tech Panel http://deemsrv10.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Jessen" <jjessen(at)rcn.com>
Subject: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative
engines, primer, and painting?
Date: Sep 06, 2006
Got more specifics? Who overhauled it, etc? John J _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rob Wright Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 11:18 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? How about $32K for a first run IO-540 with new cylinders, EIS ignition, and overhaul? Rob Wright #392 Closed up Left Wing tonight... _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of jdalton77 Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 4:06 PM Subject: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? H aha ha. Seriously, any way to not spend 40k on an engine? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2006
From: pilotdds(at)aol.com
Subject: Re: intake alternate air
Make sure you are aware of vans servce bulletin to replace the hinge on the alternate air.My engine ingested the magnet.No damage but scary. -----Original Message----- From: dlm46007(at)cox.net Sent: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:04 AM Subject: RV10-List: intake alternate air For those operating the IO540 D4A5, are you installing both hinged alternate door on the front of the box and the emergency air door on the bottom of the box? ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Required tools for toolbox kit
Date: Sep 06, 2006
From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com>
My rule of thumb is "Don't buy anything from Sears that requires gasoline or electricity." Their hand tools are ok. Seriously, I've got a Sears 12" bandsaw and with a metal cutting balde, it is fine for most of the aluminum cutting you will be doing. Jack Phillips #40610 Horizontal Stabilizer -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kelly McMullen Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 12:50 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Required tools for toolbox kit In a slightly more serious light, what tools would you suggest purchasing in the Sears Craftsman line, given that I already know my current compressor is too light duty, too noisey, don't have any shop power tools like grinder, band saw, drill press etc. and just happen to have a nice credit balance there to play with. I anticipate getting the majority of riveting/sheet metal tools from Cleaveland, Avery & other aircraft sources. So I'm just looking at non-aviation specific stuff to buy at Sears. _________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2006
Subject: Re: Required tools for toolbox kit
From: "Kelly McMullen" <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Thank you for the recommendation. Any issues with oil lubed pump to be concerned with? I was aware they tend to run quieter than the oiless pumps. That would be a big plus. > if you want a good 110v compressor?- less noisey and can do most of the > plane - short of painting Craftsman 25Gallon > > if the link fails > www.sears.com > search for item # 00919541000 > > That should clear up that credit quick! > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2006
From: Patrick Thyssen <jump2(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: ATG goes w/ Op Tech
Deems, I got OP Tech efis intergrated system at Sun n Fun and having my panel cut this week. At Oshkosh We bought a Pcas system XRX by Zaon, Using it in my C310,and got OP( DEXTER) and them to talk. Dexter is suppose to see if we can get it talking and diplay on the screeen FYI. It has a 232 port. I finally bought a power supply and fired up both displays, They look pretty good if I say so myself. Pat Thyssen Houston area #257 Deems Davis wrote: FYI, Another vendor just made Op Tech their EFIS. Here's a link from Aero News announcing ATG's decision to make Op Tech their Glass panel vendor: http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?ContentBlockID=98e9caf0-593b-4468-9030-528ee62b8329&#d Deems Davis # 406 Wiring Op Tech Panel http://deemsrv10.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Javier Henderson <javier(at)kjsl.com>
Subject: Re: Required tools for toolbox kit
Date: Sep 06, 2006
On Sep 6, 2006, at 2:20 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > Thank you for the recommendation. Any issues with oil lubed pump to be > concerned with? I was aware they tend to run quieter than the oiless > pumps. They are quieter, and they last longer than the dry pumps, indeed. -jav ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Cram" <johncram(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: ATG goes w/ Op Tech
Date: Sep 06, 2006
Pat, what part of the Houston area are you. We are going to be building there also. John Cram 40569 Emp. ----- Original Message ----- From: Patrick Thyssen<mailto:jump2(at)sbcglobal.net> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 2:36 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: ATG goes w/ Op Tech Deems, I got OP Tech efis intergrated system at Sun n Fun and having my panel cut this week. At Oshkosh We bought a Pcas system XRX by Zaon, Using it in my C310,and got OP( DEXTER) and them to talk. Dexter is suppose to see if we can get it talking and diplay on the screeen FYI. It has a 232 port. I finally bought a power supply and fired up both displays, They look pretty good if I say so myself. Pat Thyssen Houston area #257 Deems Davis wrote: FYI, Another vendor just made Op Tech their EFIS. Here's a link from Aero News announcing ATG's decision to make Op Tech their Glass panel http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List igator?RV10-List> http://www.matronics.com/contribution on> ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2006
From: Rick <ricksked(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Static port question
That's not all that unusual, it seems a bit extreme but it does allow the air to breakup over the actual port. If I recall the oply problems folks have had with the Cleaveland ports (I'm using those) is making them flush with the skin. I think Mike piped in about the face of the port needs to be a thousandth or so above the actual aircraft skin otherwise the hole will act like a venturi and create a negative static pressure as the airflow passes over the static port. Rick S. 40185 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Gonzalez" <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com>
Subject: Static port question
Date: Sep 06, 2006
Not that I really know, but doesn't this venturi happen anyway and isn't that why there is a port on both sides of the fuselage to cancel out the negatives and positives of the other port? My sailplane has a total of six in the tail boom located 120 degrees apart and they are as flush as they can be. John G. >From: Rick <ricksked(at)earthlink.net> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RE: RV10-List: Static port question >Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 12:43:31 -0700 (GMT-07:00) > > >That's not all that unusual, it seems a bit extreme but it does allow the >air to breakup over the actual port. If I recall the oply problems folks >have had with the Cleaveland ports (I'm using those) is making them flush >with the skin. I think Mike piped in about the face of the port needs to be >a thousandth or so above the actual aircraft skin otherwise the hole will >act like a venturi and create a negative static pressure as the airflow >passes over the static port. > >Rick S. >40185 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Sargeant" <k5wiv(at)amsat.org>
Subject: Required tools for toolbox kit
Date: Sep 06, 2006
I wouldn't even consider an oil less. But with the oil lubed, you will need a good oil separator/filter for use with a rivet squeezer and with painting equipment. Jack & Cecilia Sargeant 1127 Patricia St. Wichita, KS 67208-2642 316/683-5268 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Kelly McMullen Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 1:20 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Required tools for toolbox kit Thank you for the recommendation. Any issues with oil lubed pump to be concerned with? I was aware they tend to run quieter than the oiless pumps. That would be a big plus. > if you want a good 110v compressor?- less noisey and can do most of the > plane - short of painting Craftsman 25Gallon > > if the link fails > www.sears.com > search for item # 00919541000 > > That should clear up that credit quick! > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: spinner fitting
Date: Sep 06, 2006
Just got the spinner directions out to prepare the spinner for the prop. The directions refer to a section 12 of the builders manual. Unable to find same; it probably contains a template for cutting the blade cutouts and the callouts for the nutplates and spinner prep. Any clues on where to look? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2006
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: ATG goes w/ Op Tech
I'm in the process of wiring my panel for dual Op Tech portrait screens. (non-integrated with a Garmin stack + Freeflight WAAS). I've had the power to them several times, and run them in DEMO mode for hours. I have NO experience in ANY glass/EFIS environment, so I don't have any frame of reference for Op Tech vs Chelton or any other EFIS/MFD but I"M TOTALLY BLOWN AWAY by the functionality that I see here. I love how you can get Sooooo much info presented on a single screen, and then you can configure the other screen for full page views, etc. or you can have them mirror the main. I also love the embedded IFR charts, I've "flown' several approaches in DEMO mode and it's so cool the way if flies the approach as well as the 'missed' and it shows you your progress (on the chart) down the approach path (vertically and horizontally!). I believe that this potentially can/will take a lot of the workload out of IFR. RE XRX , if ZAON has an RS 232 hardware interface it should just be a matter of software for Dexter. I hope they do it! Are you doing your own install? Please keep us posted on your progress. I'm not to the point where I'm ready to power things up yet, and all of this wiring stuff is a whole new set of skills I'm learning/slowly acquiring. Deems Davis # 406 Fuse
http://deemsrv10.com/ Patrick Thyssen wrote: > Deems, I got OP Tech efis intergrated system at Sun n Fun and having > my panel cut this week. At Oshkosh We bought a Pcas system XRX by > Zaon, Using it in my C310,and got OP( DEXTER) and them to talk. Dexter > is suppose to see if we can get it talking and diplay on the screeen > FYI. It has a 232 port. > I finally bought a power supply and fired up both displays, They look > pretty good if I say so myself. > Pat Thyssen > Houston area #257 > > */Deems Davis /* wrote: > > > FYI, Another vendor just made Op Tech their EFIS. Here's a link from > Aero News announcing ATG's decision to make Op Tech their Glass panel > >* > > >* > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: elhershb(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: spinner fitting
Date: Sep 07, 2006
I just checked my build manual and the instructions for fitting the spinner are found in section 47, pages 2 &3. -------------- Original message -------------- From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net> > > Just got the spinner directions out to prepare the spinner for the prop. The > directions refer to a section 12 of the builders manual. Unable to find > same; it probably contains a template for cutting the blade cutouts and the > callouts for the nutplates and spinner prep. Any clues on where to look? > > > > > >
I just checked my build manual and the instructions for fitting the spinner are found in section 47, pages 2 &3.
 
much

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: spinner fitting
Date: Sep 06, 2006
Thanks: ----- Original Message ----- From: elhershb(at)comcast.net To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 5:56 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: spinner fitting I just checked my build manual and the instructions for fitting the spinner are found in section 47, pages 2 &3. much ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hasbrouck" <jhasbrouck(at)woh.rr.com>
Subject: Required tools
Date: Sep 06, 2006
My $.02 regarding tools. I bought the tool kit from Cleaveland and have been satisfied with the quality and service I've received from them. Sears supplied the rest of the stuff I've been using. 9" band saw, bench top drill press, bench grinder, Dremel tool with flexible extension, air compressor ( oiless) and torque wrenches. My space was limited and to be honest I'd have bought a larger band saw and drill press if the room was available but these have been fine. The compressor is a noisy SOB and would buy an oiled version if I had to do it over. I don't plan on painting the plane myself so an oiled compressor without the driers and oil/air seperator would work great. The Dremel tool has been indispensible for trimming and polishing. It occasionally has been used to final drill a hole ( using the flexible extension) when nothing else would work. All torque wrenches should be certified yearly or after being dropped if you want to use them for aircraft construction. I have an independent lab in town that my IA sent me to to do this and the Sears wrenches have always been dead on. Hope this helps! John Hasbrouck #40264 Attaching tailcone ________________________________________________________________________________
From: EFDsteve(at)aol.com
Date: Sep 06, 2006
Subject: Re: Required tools for toolbox kit
I also have the Craftsman 12" band saw with the metal cutting blade, and I've never had a problem with it. Also, I have the Craftsman floor standing drill press, which is also good. For a grinder to put the scotch brite wheel on, I just used the Harbor Freight model and bought it when it was on sale. You'll never match their price at Sears, and it also works great. Steve Weinstock 40230 In a message dated 9/6/2006 12:01:41 P.M. Central Standard Time, Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com writes: --> RV10-List message posted by: "Phillips, Jack" My rule of thumb is "Don't buy anything from Sears that requires gasoline or electricity." Their hand tools are ok. Seriously, I've got a Sears 12" bandsaw and with a metal cutting balde, it is fine for most of the aluminum cutting you will be doing. Jack Phillips #40610 Horizontal Stabilizer -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kelly McMullen Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 12:50 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Required tools for toolbox kit In a slightly more serious light, what tools would you suggest purchasing in the Sears Craftsman line, given that I already know my current compressor is too light duty, too noisey, don't have any shop power tools like grinder, band saw, drill press etc. and just happen to have a nice credit balance there to play with. I anticipate getting the majority of riveting/sheet metal tools from Cleaveland, Avery & other aircraft sources. So I'm just looking at non-aviation specific stuff to buy at Sears. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2006
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Required tools for toolbox kit
Thanks so much for all the ideas. I'm sure I'll be acquiring some of those items. EFDsteve(at)aol.com wrote: > I also have the Craftsman 12" band saw with the metal cutting blade, and > I've never had a problem with it. Also, I have the Craftsman floor > standing drill press, which is also good. For a grinder to put the > scotch brite wheel on, I just used the Harbor Freight model and bought > it when it was on sale. You'll never match their price at Sears, and it > also works great. > > Steve Weinstock > 40230 > > In a message dated 9/6/2006 12:01:41 P.M. Central Standard Time, > Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com writes: > > > > My rule of thumb is "Don't buy anything from Sears that requires > gasoline or electricity." Their hand tools are ok. > > Seriously, I've got a Sears 12" bandsaw and with a metal cutting balde, > it is fine for most of the aluminum cutting you will be doing. > > Jack Phillips > #40610 > Horizontal Stabilizer > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rob Wright" <armywrights(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative
engines, primer, and painting?
Date: Sep 06, 2006
AirTech, near Orlando, FL. Richard Waters owns it and is who I dealt with. My engine came off of a R44 in France with 1400 hours on it. Engine had been in his shop and pickled since 2003 or 2004. He reconfigured it to IO540 C4B5/D4A5 from the helicopter config, overhauled, installed new cylinders, Fuel injection spider, and shipped the EIS boxes in the crate with the engine. Straight overhaul was about $27K, added the other ~$7K for Cylinders and EIS. Cores are fairly rare. He says he likes to deal with European suppliers because they're fairer about the raw product he buys. Dunno, but he's been in business around 30+ years. Remember, the only difference between C4B5 and D4A5 is how you operate it. Engine is in the crate at the airport wrapped up waiting for me to get the fuse on the gear Rob Wright #392 Closed up Right Wing tonight. Ordered Hartzell Prop today _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Jessen Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 9:23 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? Got more specifics? Who overhauled it, etc? John J _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rob Wright Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 11:18 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? How about $32K for a first run IO-540 with new cylinders, EIS ignition, and overhaul? Rob Wright #392 Closed up Left Wing tonight... _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of jdalton77 Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 4:06 PM Subject: RV10-List: Since there is no one here can we talk about alternative engines, primer, and painting? H aha ha. Seriously, any way to not spend 40k on an engine? s.com/Navigator?RV10-List ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rob Wright" <armywrights(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: spinner fitting
Date: Sep 06, 2006
I think I recall some papers in the bag-o-stuff that comes with the spinner's subkit; Section 12 may be in there. Rob Wright #392 Finish kit inventoried but not quite there yet! -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of David McNeill Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 7:31 PM Subject: RV10-List: spinner fitting Just got the spinner directions out to prepare the spinner for the prop. The directions refer to a section 12 of the builders manual. Unable to find same; it probably contains a template for cutting the blade cutouts and the callouts for the nutplates and spinner prep. Any clues on where to look? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Russell Daves" <dav1111(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Build times - time to get restarted?
Date: Sep 07, 2006
Larry: First let me give you my background so you have some perspective to work from. I am a 60 year old first time builder with 1500+ hours flying time, an instrument ticket, and a full time law practice. My first five airplanes were three C182's, a C-177, and a Bellance Super Viking. My sixth airplane was an RV-6A which I purchased. I loved it so much that when the RV-10 came out I decided I had to build it in order to have both an RV and a four place airplane. From October of 2003 until about July of 2004 I worked on the Emp/Tailcone kit getting it mostly built. I had an A&P friend who taught me the basic building skills and gave me a hand at times when it really helps to have a second pair of hands (there are a lot of those times). When the QB wings arrived I did a little work on them while finishing up on the Emp/Tailcone but the wings I basically set aside after receiving the QB fuselage and worked on it until about March of 2005 when one of my best friends (and RV-10 builder) passed away. I spent most of my spare time over the next three months helping his widow get his RV-10, engine, and prop sold. I then had three major surgeries during the period of May-August of 2005. When I recovered and got back to building in November of 2005 I pushed ahead with every free waking hour (average 6 hours sleep a night) until I finished my RV-10 and flew it on 7/28/06. Thirty three months from start to finish including the over 8 months of down time, and keeping my solo law office afloat. Would I do it again? In a heart beat!! I have enjoyed the building process even though the last three months were hell on wheels because of the deadline I set for myself of flying to OSH2006. I flew the week of OSH2006 just not to OSH2006. So close yet so far away. My -10 is in the paint shop at GLO Custom Paint and I am due to get it back next week. I can hardly wait. Had I not sold my RV-6A early during the building process I would not have pushed myself so hard to get the RV-10 built by OSH2006, but on the other hand I am really glad I sold when I did as I obtained a really good price and it helped pay for the RV-10 build. If you are not going to make a commitment to build, now is the time to sell your Emp/Tail kit. Building an RV-10 takes both a commitment of time as well as money. From a time standpoint you will be better off committing a regular consistent amount of time, whether that is 10 hours a week or closer to 20 hours a week for part time building. The long layoff's and stop/start of the building process is not helpful and will cause you to have to spend a lot of extra time just getting back up to speed in the building process. >From a money standpoint, I did not build cheap, however I probably have about $150,000.00 in my RV-10, but I didn't go as expensive as some who I am sure will have $200,000 or more in their RV-10. I doubt you can do a decent job of building a quality RV-10 for less than about $125,000.00. I hope this helps you make a decision. One thing I assure you of, if you decide to the building commitment there are a lot of really great guys out there who can help you with advise, pictures, and encouragement. The RV community is one of the best groups of guys and girls you will ever come across. If you are not active in a local EAA chapter I would also encourage you to get active as the EAA group is great as well. Russ Daves N710RV flying > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Larry R > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 9:13 AM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Build times - time to get restarted? > > > I was one of the first to buy a tail kit (#22), but life intruded and > after > some initial progress the kid has been untouched for the last 2 years. I'm > now getting the itch to get hack into the project, but I'm wonder if I've > bit off more than I can chew. > > I'd be interested in hearing from anyone who has completed, or nearly > completed a Quick-Build RV-10, regard times to completion for each of the > sub-kits (empecone, wings, etc). Did you try to optimize for lowest cost > of > fastest build time? What major obstacles did you hit? What words of > advice/encouragement would you offer? > > Its getting depressing to see the tail parts hanging there every time I > pull > into the garage. Its time for me to either get my you-know-what in gear or > admit to myself that this isn't going to happen and sell the tail kit. > > Replies directly to this email _lr_@yahoo.com are welcome. > > Thanks in advance, > > Larry Rachman > ISP > > > __________________________________________________ > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 07, 2006
From: Patrick Thyssen <jump2(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: ATG goes w/ Op Tech
I'm at David Wayne Hooks airport, Northwest corner of HOUSTON, between Spring and Tomball. What about Yourself? Pat Thyssen 257 John Cram wrote: Pat, what part of the Houston area are you. We are going to be building there also. John Cram 40569 Emp. ----- Original Message ----- From: Patrick Thyssen To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 2:36 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: ATG goes w/ Op Tech Deems, I got OP Tech efis intergrated system at Sun n Fun and having my panel cut this week. At Oshkosh We bought a Pcas system XRX by Zaon, Using it in my C310,and got OP( DEXTER) and them to talk. Dexter is suppose to see if we can get it talking and diplay on the screeen FYI. It has a 232 port. I finally bought a power supply and fired up both displays, They look pretty good if I say so myself. Pat Thyssen Houston area #257 Deems Davis wrote: --> RV10-List message posted by: Deems Davis FYI, Another vendor just made Op Tech their EFIS. Here's a link from Aero News announcing ATG's decision to make Op Tech their Glass panel s.com/Navigator?RV10-List ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Paint $$
Date: Sep 07, 2006
From: "Tim Dawson-Townsend" <Tdawson(at)avidyne.com>
Russ or any others: What has been the approximate cost of having your -10 painted at GLO Custom? TDT 40025 ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com on behalf of Russell Daves Sent: Thu 9/7/2006 6:01 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Build times - time to get restarted? Larry: First let me give you my background so you have some perspective to work from. I am a 60 year old first time builder with 1500+ hours flying time, an instrument ticket, and a full time law practice. My first five airplanes were three C182's, a C-177, and a Bellance Super Viking. My sixth airplane was an RV-6A which I purchased. I loved it so much that when the RV-10 came out I decided I had to build it in order to have both an RV and a four place airplane. From October of 2003 until about July of 2004 I worked on the Emp/Tailcone kit getting it mostly built. I had an A&P friend who taught me the basic building skills and gave me a hand at times when it really helps to have a second pair of hands (there are a lot of those times). When the QB wings arrived I did a little work on them while finishing up on the Emp/Tailcone but the wings I basically set aside after receiving the QB fuselage and worked on it until about March of 2005 when one of my best friends (and RV-10 builder) passed away. I spent most of my spare time over the next three months helping his widow get his RV-10, engine, and prop sold. I then had three major surgeries during the period of May-August of 2005. When I recovered and got back to building in November of 2005 I pushed ahead with every free waking hour (average 6 hours sleep a night) until I finished my RV-10 and flew it on 7/28/06. Thirty three months from start to finish including the over 8 months of down time, and keeping my solo law office afloat. Would I do it again? In a heart beat!! I have enjoyed the building process even though the last three months were hell on wheels because of the deadline I set for myself of flying to OSH2006. I flew the week of OSH2006 just not to OSH2006. So close yet so far away. My -10 is in the paint shop at GLO Custom Paint and I am due to get it back next week. I can hardly wait. Had I not sold my RV-6A early during the building process I would not have pushed myself so hard to get the RV-10 built by OSH2006, but on the other hand I am really glad I sold when I did as I obtained a really good price and it helped pay for the RV-10 build. If you are not going to make a commitment to build, now is the time to sell your Emp/Tail kit. Building an RV-10 takes both a commitment of time as well as money. From a time standpoint you will be better off committing a regular consistent amount of time, whether that is 10 hours a week or closer to 20 hours a week for part time building. The long layoff's and stop/start of the building process is not helpful and will cause you to have to spend a lot of extra time just getting back up to speed in the building process. >From a money standpoint, I did not build cheap, however I probably have about $150,000.00 in my RV-10, but I didn't go as expensive as some who I am sure will have $200,000 or more in their RV-10. I doubt you can do a decent job of building a quality RV-10 for less than about $125,000.00. I hope this helps you make a decision. One thing I assure you of, if you decide to the building commitment there are a lot of really great guys out there who can help you with advise, pictures, and encouragement. The RV community is one of the best groups of guys and girls you will ever come across. If you are not active in a local EAA chapter I would also encourage you to get active as the EAA group is great as well. Russ Daves N710RV flying > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Larry R > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 9:13 AM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com


August 15, 2006 - September 07, 2006

RV10-Archive.digest.vol-bl