RV10-Archive.digest.vol-br

November 03, 2006 - November 12, 2006



      the bulkhead....
      
      
      However, once past the GRT and Chelton obligitory time on the phone, and all
      are set up.....
      
      
      Wonderful displays - BOTH.  Can't wait to get my AHRS from Chelton to
      complete the setup.
      
      
      But, for those of you who really want to know what it's like to finally fly
      the RV-10...........It's superb.
      
      
      I have a data point or two to reference from.....F-105, A-7D, F-16A/B/C/D,
      F-117. F-15...
      
      
      So, Grumpy, what the hell are you telling me?
      
      
      The RV-10 is an outstanding airplane!  Flies with fingers only....responds
      beautifully to all inputs.  Flies formation almost like the Thunderbirds
      (thrust, not controls.....).  Beautifully handling and forgiving airframe.
      
      
      Try it......you'll like it!
      
      
      Now....who's going to help me with the interior<<<
      
      
      Check 6 - Grumpy
      
      
      P.S., Thanks for the checkout, Alex!!!!
      
      
        _____  
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DejaVu" <wvu(at)ameritel.net>
Subject: Re: Grumpy's RV-10 Flies!!!
Date: Nov 03, 2006
Congrats Grumpy! Isn't the A-7D an odd ball in the mix? Anh ----- Original Message ----- From: gengrumpy(at)aol.com To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 11:35 PM Subject: RV10-List: Grumpy's RV-10 Flies!!! Please pardon if in insult any of you. I am pleased to announce that N184JM, RV#40404, Rv-10, achieved first flight today, 3 Nov06. I got the DAR release from Mel, yesterday (who did the 2 beautiful birds in CO last year) yesterday. Mel was an absolute wonderful set of eyes to find things I had overlooked, and cleared me for flight yesterday. I strongly recommed Mel (Dallas Area) for any RV-10 clearances! Let me digress a little about N184JM. I began work on 184JM in June of 05 with the tail kit. (That's after my wife DeSha decided I should do this, prodeed by help from old AF friends.....). I decided to do my build in TX although we live in TN. Why did we do this??? Our good, long time friend Paul Orf lives in TX, and over several bottles of Beefeaters he convinced me that we should build this bird in his hangar facility in TX. He claimed that he had all the tools, so it would be easy and it wouldn't cost me as much.... So, the tooth fairy said what????? 18 months later, uncountable trips to TX, and wearing thin on my friends (and after we drained numeroous Beefeters bottles), N184JM flew on 3 Nov 2006. Today, I put 2 sorties on her, for a total of about 3.5 hrs total. Aerosport Power built IO-540 engine, special built 2 bladed prop by Johnnie Downs, the best prop guy in TX (now in Arkansas). Minor hiccups (as expected). Panel is from Davd Buckwalter of Avionice Systems in Leesburg, VA. Dual Cheltons plus GRT 6000 EIS. Programming manuals from both GRT and Cheltons are the pits. After lots of time on the phone, get all the bugs worked out. Except the AHRS from Chelton that has been promised for months now.....all I have is wires behind the bulkhead.... However, once past the GRT and Chelton obligitory time on the phone, and all are set up..... Wonderful displays - BOTH. Can't wait to get my AHRS from Chelton to complete the setup. But, for those of you who really want to know what it's like to finally fly the RV-10...........It's superb. I have a data point or two to reference from.....F-105, A-7D, F-16A/B/C/D, F-117. F-15... So, Grumpy, what the hell are you telling me? The RV-10 is an outstanding airplane! Flies with fingers only....responds beautifully to all inputs. Flies formation almost like the Thunderbirds (thrust, not controls.....). Beautifully handling and forgiving airframe. Try it......you'll like it! Now....who's going to help me with the interior<<< Check 6 - Grumpy P.S., Thanks for the checkout, Alex!!!! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 03, 2006
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Engine trouble shoots
DejaVu wrote: > Ran my engine again today with two new Slicks. Below is the summary. > I would appreciate if anyone can provide insights to the troublesome > numbers. > > 1. Fuel Pressure read 2.2psi at 1700rpm with boost pump off. 2.3psi > with the boost pump on. A little low don't you think? Right for carb, low by factor of ten for injection. > 2. Mags check resulted in about 100rpm drop on both mags. Normal. > 3. EGT on only #2 and #4 are high ~1500deg at 1700rpm. What up with this? Not too high. EGT relates to mixture, not power output. You can achieve same EGT at 1700 as at cruise, but at 1700 it isn't important, because you are at way below 50 percent power. > 4. When cycling the prop lever MAP does not decrease during the first > inch as I was pulling the lever back. Is this normal? Yes, you are putting more load on the engine with constant power. > 5. Pulling the mixture to idle cutoff resulted in no increase in rpm > before the engine quits - engine runs lean. Richened the adjustment on > the fuel servo one full turn in the direction of the "R-->"caused the > engine to run rough and quit after a few seconds at 1700rpm. That was > pro'ly too aggressive an adjustment but did I turn it in the correct > direction? Something else is involved. Adjusting the idle mixture one turn should not affect your partial power much, but if you have Bendix/Precision injection 1 full turn is too much. Make adjustments one notch at a time. Quarter turn is likely what you needed. > 6. Electrical system read 11.7V and -4Amp as measure by GRT EIS. > Hall effect sensor is installed on battery side. Cycling ALT switch > didn't appear to make a difference. Will check wiring. > > BTW, she weighed in at 1625lbs. > > Anh > #141 > * > > > * _- _- _- _- _- _- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Erickson" <john.erickson(at)cox.net>
Subject: Grumpy's RV-10 Flies!!!
Date: Nov 03, 2006
Hah, you think you envy his speed...Congrats Grumpy from another viper driver... John "Droopy" Erickson #40208 Wings _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rob Wright Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 8:41 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Grumpy's RV-10 Flies!!! Awesome. It's no race, but I envy your completion speed! Rob Wright #392 Tailcone attach _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of gengrumpy(at)aol.com Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 10:35 PM Subject: RV10-List: Grumpy's RV-10 Flies!!! Please pardon if in insult any of you. I am pleased to announce that N184JM, RV#40404, Rv-10, achieved first flight today, 3 Nov06. I got the DAR release from Mel, yesterday (who did the 2 beautiful birds in CO last year) yesterday. Mel was an absolute wonderful set of eyes to find things I had overlooked, and cleared me for flight yesterday. I strongly recommed Mel (Dallas Area) for any RV-10 clearances! Let me digress a little about N184JM. I began work on 184JM in June of 05 with the tail kit. (That's after my wife DeSha decided I should do this, prodeed by help from old AF friends.....). I decided to do my build in TX although we live in TN. Why did we do this??? Our good, long time friend Paul Orf lives in TX, and over several bottles of Beefeaters he convinced me that we should build this bird in his hangar facility in TX. He claimed that he had all the tools, so it would be easy and it wouldn't cost me as much.... So, the tooth fairy said what????? 18 months later, uncountable trips to TX, and wearing thin on my friends (and after we drained numeroous Beefeters bottles), N184JM flew on 3 Nov 2006. Today, I put 2 sorties on her, for a total of about 3.5 hrs total. Aerosport Power built IO-540 engine, special built 2 bladed prop by Johnnie Downs, the best prop guy in TX (now in Arkansas). Minor hiccups (as expected). Panel is from Davd Buckwalter of Avionice Systems in Leesburg, VA. Dual Cheltons plus GRT 6000 EIS. Programming manuals from both GRT and Cheltons are the pits. After lots of time on the phone, get all the bugs worked out. Except the AHRS from Chelton that has been promised for months now.....all I have is wires behind the bulkhead.... However, once past the GRT and Chelton obligitory time on the phone, and all are set up..... Wonderful displays - BOTH. Can't wait to get my AHRS from Chelton to complete the setup. But, for those of you who really want to know what it's like to finally fly the RV-10...........It's superb. I have a data point or two to reference from.....F-105, A-7D, F-16A/B/C/D, F-117. F-15... So, Grumpy, what the hell are you telling me? The RV-10 is an outstanding airplane! Flies with fingers only....responds beautifully to all inputs. Flies formation almost like the Thunderbirds (thrust, not controls.....). Beautifully handling and forgiving airframe. Try it......you'll like it! Now....who's going to help me with the interior<<< Check 6 - Grumpy P.S., Thanks for the checkout, Alex!!!! _____ http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rob Kermanj <flysrv10(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Grumpy's RV-10 Flies!!!
Date: Nov 04, 2006
Congratulations! Short building time, was it a QB Kit? Rob Kermanj On Nov 3, 2006, at 11:35 PM, gengrumpy(at)aol.com wrote: > Please pardon if in insult any of you. > > I am pleased to announce that N184JM, RV#40404, Rv-10, achieved > first flight today, 3 Nov06. I got the DAR release from Mel, > yesterday (who did the 2 beautiful birds in CO last year) > yesterday. Mel was an absolute wonderful set of eyes to find > things I had overlooked, and cleared me for flight yesterday. I > strongly recommed Mel (Dallas Area) for any RV-10 clearances! > > Let me digress a little about N184JM. > > I began work on 184JM in June of 05 with the tail kit. (That's > after my wife DeSha decided I should do this, prodeed by help from > old AF friends.....). I decided to do my build in TX although we > live in TN. Why did we do this??? > > Our good, long time friend Paul Orf lives in TX, and over several > bottles of Beefeaters he convinced me that we should build this > bird in his hangar facility in TX. He claimed that he had all the > tools, so it would be easy and it wouldn't cost me as much.... > > So, the tooth fairy said what????? > > 18 months later, uncountable trips to TX, and wearing thin on my > friends (and after we drained numeroous Beefeters bottles), N184JM > flew on 3 Nov 2006. > > Today, I put 2 sorties on her, for a total of about 3.5 hrs total. > Aerosport Power built IO-540 engine, special built 2 bladed prop by > Johnnie Downs, the best prop guy in TX (now in Arkansas). > > Minor hiccups (as expected). Panel is from Davd Buckwalter of > Avionice Systems in Leesburg, VA. Dual Cheltons plus GRT 6000 EIS. > > Programming manuals from both GRT and Cheltons are the pits. > After lots of time on the phone, get all the bugs worked out. > Except the AHRS from Chelton that has been promised for months > now.....all I have is wires behind the bulkhead.... > > However, once past the GRT and Chelton obligitory time on the > phone, and all are set up..... > > Wonderful displays - BOTH. Can't wait to get my AHRS from Chelton > to complete the setup. > > But, for those of you who really want to know what it's like to > finally fly the RV-10...........It's superb. > > I have a data point or two to reference from.....F-105, A-7D, F-16A/ > B/C/D, F-117. F-15... > > So, Grumpy, what the hell are you telling me? > > The RV-10 is an outstanding airplane! Flies with fingers > only....responds beautifully to all inputs. Flies formation almost > like the Thunderbirds (thrust, not controls.....). Beautifully > handling and forgiving airframe. > > Try it......you'll like it! > > Now....who's going to help me with the interior<<< > > Check 6 - Grumpy > > P.S., Thanks for the checkout, Alex!!!! > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jesse Saint" <jesse(at)itecusa.org>
Subject: Engine trouble shoots
Date: Nov 04, 2006
From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of DejaVu Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 11:03 PM Subject: RV10-List: Engine trouble shoots Ran my engine again today with two new Slicks. Below is the summary. I would appreciate if anyone can provide insights to the troublesome numbers. 1. Fuel Pressure read 2.2psi at 1700rpm with boost pump off. 2.3psi with the boost pump on. A little low don't you think? If it truly is that number, that would definitely be a little low. My question would be, =93are you absolutely sure you have the right sensor and the right sensor setting in your engine monitor?=94 Would the engine even start with this low of fuel pressure. 2. Mags check resulted in about 100rpm drop on both mags. Normal. This doesn=92t seem normal if your fuel pressure is truly 2.2PSI. Again, check that fuel pressure sensor. 3. EGT on only #2 and #4 are high ~1500deg at 1700rpm. What up with this? Try swapping sensors on 1&5 with 2&4 and see if you still get the same high readings. If so, then try hooking up the wires for 2 to the sensor for 6 (while it is still in 6) and see if it still reads that high. If so, then you either have bad sensors or bad wiring. 4. When cycling the prop lever MAP does not decrease during the first inch as I was pulling the lever back. Is this normal? No clue whatsoever. 5. Pulling the mixture to idle cutoff resulted in no increase in rpm before the engine quits - engine runs lean. Richened the adjustment on the fuel servo one full turn in the direction of the "R-->"caused the engine to run rough and quit after a few seconds at 1700rpm. That was pro'ly too aggressive an adjustment but did I turn it in the correct direction? 6. Electrical system read 11.7V and -4Amp as measure by GRT EIS. Hall effect sensor is installed on battery side. Cycling ALT switch didn't appear to make a difference. Will check wiring. The Alt field (as Van=92s calls it) switch makes about 3-5 Amps difference in my current draw on the Dynon ammeter shunt. Are you sure the alternator is working? If not, that would account for your low voltage, probably. You shouldn=92t be drawing 4 amps when the alternator is running, unless your sensor is in a place where you would see all current draw in the system not accounting for the amount of charging you are getting. We have ours setup between the battery and the bus/alternator (it sounds like this is where yours is) and it shows total/overall current into or out of the battery. BTW, she weighed in at 1625lbs. With or without the pilot? :-) Anh #141 "http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List"http://www.matronics.com/Na vig ator?RV10-List 11/3/2006 -- 11/3/2006 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jdalton77" <jdalton77(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Wing and Fuselage Dolly
Date: Nov 04, 2006
Wing and Fuselage DollyI bought two last week when I saw the add. They also have a 10% off coupon in their most recent mailer - so I got them for $26.99. Hard to build it for that. Jeff ----- Original Message ----- From: John W. Cox To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 6:58 PM Subject: RV10-List: Wing and Fuselage Dolly Harbor Freight is offering a 1,000 pound capacity, Model 94778 Dolly capable of being easily converted into a slick wing dolly or fuselage rotisserie. Can be used for inverting aircraft fuselage and completing difficult riveting, interior canopy sanding or instrument wiring tasks - inverted. http://www.harborfreight.com/manuals/94000-94999/94778.pdf price is $29.99 and worthy of competition to the wood unit displayed on Tim's site. No affiliation or business dealings, just information - "don't shoot the messenger". John Cox #40600 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Overhead Console
From: "johngoodman" <johngoodman(at)earthlink.net>
Date: Nov 04, 2006
It's a little early for me to commit (still doing elevators), but it looks interesting to me. Is there any head clearance issue with the back seat passengers? John -------- #40572 Empennage - starting Elevators! N711JG reserved Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=72269#72269 _- _- _- _- _- _- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 04, 2006
From: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Grumpy's RV-10 Flies!!!
Congratulations! I know it is not the highest on your priorities while flying the first few hours, but how is Accuracy Avionics overhead console working out. Are you getting enough air? Larry Rosen #356 gengrumpy(at)aol.com wrote: > Please pardon if in insult any of you. > > I am pleased to announce that N184JM, RV#40404, Rv-10, achieved first > flight today, 3 Nov06. I got the DAR release from Mel, yesterday (who > did the 2 beautiful birds in CO last year) yesterday. Mel was an > absolute wonderful set of eyes to find things I had overlooked, and > cleared me for flight yesterday. I strongly recommed Mel (Dallas > Area) for any RV-10 clearances! > > Let me digress a little about N184JM. > > I began work on 184JM in June of 05 with the tail kit. (That's after > my wife DeSha decided I should do this, prodeed by help from old AF > friends.....). I decided to do my build in TX although we live in > TN. Why did we do this??? > > Our good, long time friend Paul Orf lives in TX, and over several > bottles of Beefeaters he convinced me that we should build this bird > in his hangar facility in TX. He claimed that he had all the tools, > so it would be easy and it wouldn't cost me as much.... > > So, the tooth fairy said what????? > > 18 months later, uncountable trips to TX, and wearing thin on my > friends (and after we drained numeroous Beefeters bottles), N184JM > flew on 3 Nov 2006. > > Today, I put 2 sorties on her, for a total of about 3.5 hrs total. > Aerosport Power built IO-540 engine, special built 2 bladed prop by > Johnnie Downs, the best prop guy in TX (now in Arkansas). > > Minor hiccups (as expected). Panel is from Davd Buckwalter of > Avionice Systems in Leesburg, VA. Dual Cheltons plus GRT 6000 EIS. > > Programming manuals from both GRT and Cheltons are the pits. After > lots of time on the phone, get all the bugs worked out. Except the > AHRS from Chelton that has been promised for months now.....all I have > is wires behind the bulkhead.... > > However, once past the GRT and Chelton obligitory time on the phone, > and all are set up..... > > Wonderful displays - BOTH. Can't wait to get my AHRS from Chelton to > complete the setup. > > But, for those of you who really want to know what it's like to > finally fly the RV-10...........It's superb. > > I have a data point or two to reference from.....F-105, A-7D, > F-16A/B/C/D, F-117. F-15... > > So, Grumpy, what the hell are you telling me? > > The RV-10 is an outstanding airplane! Flies with fingers > only....responds beautifully to all inputs. Flies formation almost > like the Thunderbirds (thrust, not controls.....). Beautifully > handling and forgiving airframe. > > Try it......you'll like it! > > Now....who's going to help me with the interior<<< > > Check 6 - Grumpy > > P.S., Thanks for the checkout, Alex!!!! > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > * > > > * _- _- _- _- _- _- ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Overhead Console
From: "zackrv8" <zackrv8(at)verizon.net>
Date: Nov 04, 2006
John, No clearance problems for the rear seat pax. I have been in and out several times and my head doesn't even come close. When I first tried to stick a DVD player in it, I did have rear seat pax issues. After talking to Scott Schmidt, I decided to put my DVD screens/player in the rear of the front seats. There is plenty of head clearance with this overhead console. As a matter of fact, there is so much that we are doing another model just a little bit wider (because there is plenty of headroom). There is plenty of space underneath the console to hide GPS antennas and such. I'll take some more pics of the second prototype and post them as soon as I can. Zack johngoodman wrote: > It's a little early for me to commit (still doing elevators), but it looks interesting to me. Is there any head clearance issue with the back seat passengers? > John -------- RV8 #80125 RV10 # 40512 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=72290#72290 _- _- _- _- _- _- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DejaVu" <wvu(at)ameritel.net>
Subject: Re: Engine trouble shoots/Update
Date: Nov 04, 2006
Thanks to all who chimed in. Ran the engine (0SMOH D4A5) again today with the help of a local mechanic. Below are updates, only item 3 is still problematic: 1. Fuel Pressure read 2.2psi at 1700rpm with boost pump off. 2.3psi with the boost pump on. A little low don't you think? Reprograming the EIS-6000 fixed it. 2. Mags check resulted in about 100rpm drop on both mags. Normal. Still the same 3. EGT on only #2 and #4 are high ~1500deg at 1700rpm. What up with this? Same reading today. The mechanic confirmed CHT's on #2 &4 are also higher than the rest. He felt for sure there's a small lint or something inside the #2 and #4 injector lines going to the fuel distributor on top of the engine. He was surprised that I don't have a gascolator. Anyone installed a gascolator? and where is a convenient place to put it that gives access for draining. And what kind of filter is that that came with Van's fuel pump (Fuel Flow Performance). i.e. do you need a gascolator on top of this filter? 4. When cycling the prop lever MAP does not decrease during the first inch as I was pulling the lever back. Is this normal? No update. 5. Pulling the mixture to idle cutoff resulted in no increase in rpm before the engine quits - engine runs lean. Richened the adjustment on the fuel servo one full turn in the direction of the "R-->"caused the engine to run rough and quit after a few seconds at 1700rpm. That was pro'ly too aggressive an adjustment but did I turn it in the correct direction? Yesterday I though the engine ran lean. Today the mechanic thought my engine rans rich. Minor leaning of the mixture resulted in a small 20rmp rise before the engine quits. I couldn't hear the 20rpm difference but he did. 6. Electrical system read 11.7V and -4Amp as measure by GRT EIS. Hall effect sensor is installed on battery side. Cycling ALT switch didn't appear to make a difference. Will check wiring. Loose plug on the back of the alternator. Didn't realize there's a locking tab on top of the plug to prevent it from backing out. It read 14.5V/4Amp today. Anh #141 ----- Original Message ----- From: Jesse Saint To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 10:29 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Engine trouble shoots From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of DejaVu Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 11:03 PM To: RV10 Subject: RV10-List: Engine trouble shoots Ran my engine again today with two new Slicks. Below is the summary. I would appreciate if anyone can provide insights to the troublesome numbers. 1. Fuel Pressure read 2.2psi at 1700rpm with boost pump off. 2.3psi with the boost pump on. A little low don't you think? If it truly is that number, that would definitely be a little low. My question would be, =93are you absolutely sure you have the right sensor and the right sensor setting in your engine monitor?=94 Would the engine even start with this low of fuel pressure. 2. Mags check resulted in about 100rpm drop on both mags. Normal. This doesn=92t seem normal if your fuel pressure is truly 2.2PSI. Again, check that fuel pressure sensor. 3. EGT on only #2 and #4 are high ~1500deg at 1700rpm. What up with this? Try swapping sensors on 1&5 with 2&4 and see if you still get the same high readings. If so, then try hooking up the wires for 2 to the sensor for 6 (while it is still in 6) and see if it still reads that high. If so, then you either have bad sensors or bad wiring. 4. When cycling the prop lever MAP does not decrease during the first inch as I was pulling the lever back. Is this normal? No clue whatsoever. 5. Pulling the mixture to idle cutoff resulted in no increase in rpm before the engine quits - engine runs lean. Richened the adjustment on the fuel servo one full turn in the direction of the "R-->"caused the engine to run rough and quit after a few seconds at 1700rpm. That was pro'ly too aggressive an adjustment but did I turn it in the correct direction? 6. Electrical system read 11.7V and -4Amp as measure by GRT EIS. Hall effect sensor is installed on battery side. Cycling ALT switch didn't appear to make a difference. Will check wiring. The Alt field (as Van=92s calls it) switch makes about 3-5 Amps difference in my current draw on the Dynon ammeter shunt. Are you sure the alternator is working? If not, that would account for your low voltage, probably. You shouldn=92t be drawing 4 amps when the alternator is running, unless your sensor is in a place where you would see all current draw in the system not accounting for the amount of charging you are getting. We have ours setup between the battery and the bus/alternator (it sounds like this is where yours is) and it shows total/overall current into or out of the battery. BTW, she weighed in at 1625lbs. With or without the pilot? J Anh #141 http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List -- Release Date: 11/3/2006 -- 11/3/2006 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 04, 2006
From: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: tailcone
There should be lots of stuff in the archives addressing these issues. But, here is some. *You can see how Deems the static tubing here <http://www.deemsrv10.com/album/Sec%2035%20Access%20covers%20and%20Floor%20panels/index.html> look at pictures DSC03048, 49 & 50. The only change I would make is I would put the tee from the two ports in the center, with the outlet up. __l__ Look here for some photo's from Tim's site. <http://www.myrv10.com/N104CD/finishing/20051228/index.html>. Small kids work well if you wait until after the fuse is attached and the canopy is on. (Hay Tim remember those days when you were a BUILDER). If you look close you can see some of the wiring and static lines. Dan has a tip to use some 1/4" id tubing from a hardware store as an anti chafe on the tubing. Here: <http://www.myrv10.com/N104CD/finishing/20051228/index.html> Some routings here: <http://www.rvproject.com/20030210.html> <http://www.rvproject.com/20030212.html> <http://www.rvproject.com/20030831.html> Larry Rosen #356 Sean Blair wrote: > > Does anyone have good pics of the inside of the tailcone showing how > you plumbed the static lines, wire runs and/or conduit, coax, etc.? > This would really help. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Sean Blair > > (40225) > > * > > > * _- _- _- _- _- _- ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: AFS primer
From: "Eddie G." <silentlight(at)verizon.net>
Date: Nov 04, 2006
I got some info from Sanchem today, but wasn't much help. Do you clean with Safeguard CC-6100C and then apply AFS gray, or do you apply CC-6100A+B after the CC-6100C and before AFS? Thanx... [quote="Todd.Stovall(at)pentagon."]I just got through priming my VS, Rudder, and the rear spar to the HS this weekend. I used the AFS gray primer/sealer and liked the results. My application wasn't perfect, but I honestly believe it was my technique ( or lack there of) that was the culprit. I chose AFS because it's water based so lower flammability issues (I'm working in my basement), lower fumes, and toxicity. I still wore a mask, but no one upstairs complained and I did have a window and door open with a fan running. I really can't rank it because I haven't used anything else, but it was easy to apply (Harbor Freight HVLP gun) and cleanup. I'm going to start smashing rivets tonight so I'll let you know how it holds up to that process. So I tentatively give it a thumbs up, but we'll see for sure after I abuse it a little. FYI, I also chose to go the Sanchem route vs. alodine, again trying to avoid toxic chemicals to maximum extent possible. This was also easy to use, but it didn't give me a warm fuzzy that the treatment is actually took. The color change was pretty uneven in places and on the whole, very light. I followed the directions to the letter so hopefully all is well, but there's know way to know for sure. Todd > -- Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=72319#72319 _- _- _- _- _- _- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 04, 2006
From: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: tailcone rear nav light & static system
Not flying but..... The only rear nav/strobe light I know of is the Whelen from vans. Periheliondesign has an expensive ($139) retrofit to convert the nav light to led here <http://www.periheliondesign.com/ledlights.htm> Static ports from Cleaveland, Vans pop rivet style, Evans Aviation <http://www.evansaviationproducts.com/Other%20Products.htm> Safe Air 1 <http://www.safeair1.com/index.htm> See some info on my web site here: <http://lrosen.nerv10.com/options.html> Larry Rosen #356 Dave Leikam wrote: > For those who are flying, what are your opinions for the best choice > for a static system and rudder lighting? Thanks. > > Dave Leikam > 40496 > tailcone in clecos > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Sean Blair > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com > *Sent:* Friday, November 03, 2006 7:55 AM > *Subject:* RV10-List: tailcone > > Does anyone have good pics of the inside of the tailcone showing > how you plumbed the static lines, wire runs and/or conduit, coax, > etc.? This would really help. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Sean Blair > > (40225) > > * > > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > > * > > * > > > * _- _- _- _- _- _- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 04, 2006
From: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: tailcone rear nav light & static system
Not flying but..... The only rear nav/strobe light I know of is the Whelen from vans. Periheliondesign has an expensive ($139) retrofit to convert the nav light to led here <http://www.periheliondesign.com/ledlights.htm> Static ports from Cleaveland, Vans pop rivet style, Evans Aviation <http://www.evansaviationproducts.com/Other%20Products.htm> Safe Air 1 <http://www.safeair1.com/index.htm> See some info on my web site here: <http://lrosen.nerv10.com/options.html> Larry Rosen #356 Dave Leikam wrote: > For those who are flying, what are your opinions for the best choice > for a static system and rudder lighting? Thanks. > > Dave Leikam > 40496 > tailcone in clecos > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Sean Blair > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com > *Sent:* Friday, November 03, 2006 7:55 AM > *Subject:* RV10-List: tailcone > > Does anyone have good pics of the inside of the tailcone showing > how you plumbed the static lines, wire runs and/or conduit, coax, > etc.? This would really help. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Sean Blair > > (40225) > > * > > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > > * > > * > > > * _- _- _- _- _- _- ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: AFS primer
Date: Nov 05, 2006
From: "Stovall Todd Lt Col AF/A4RX" <Todd.Stovall(at)pentagon.af.mil>
Eddie, Clean with the "C", rinse, mix the "A" & "B" 1:1, apply, rinse and let air dry. Shooting with compressed iar will speed the process, just make sure you are wearing gloves when handling the parts so you don't contaminate them. Within 12 hours apply the AFS primer. This is the same sequense if you were using alumiprep (which I'm going to try next time vs. the "C" product), alodine, and any Brand-x epoxy primer. Todd ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com on behalf of Eddie G. Sent: Sat 11/4/2006 8:04 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: AFS primer I got some info from Sanchem today, but wasn't much help. Do you clean with Safeguard CC-6100C and then apply AFS gray, or do you apply CC-6100A+B after the CC-6100C and before AFS? Thanx... [quote="Todd.Stovall(at)pentagon."]I just got through priming my VS, Rudder, and the rear spar to the HS this weekend. I used the AFS gray primer/sealer and liked the results. My application wasn't perfect, but I honestly believe it was my technique ( or lack there of) that was the culprit. I chose AFS because it's water based so lower flammability issues (I'm working in my basement), lower fumes, and toxicity. I still wore a mask, but no one upstairs complained and I did have a window and door open with a fan running. I really can't rank it because I haven't used anything else, but it was easy to apply (Harbor Freight HVLP gun) and cleanup. I'm going to start smashing rivets tonight so I'll let you know how it holds up to that process. So I tentatively give it a thumbs up, but we'll see for sure after I abuse it a little. FYI, I also chose to go the Sanchem route vs. alodine, again trying to avoid toxic chemicals to maximum extent possible. This was also easy to use, but it didn't give me a warm fuzzy that the treatment is actually took. The color change was pretty uneven in places and on the whole, very light. I followed the directions to the letter so hopefully all is well, but there's know way to know for sure. Todd > -- Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=72319#72319 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: uneven tire wear
Date: Nov 05, 2006
For the flying 10s: Are the tires wearing evenly? Any uneven wear on the outboard edges of the mains? Trying to get some idea whether the toein for the 10 is properly set by the factory legs and pilot holes. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Marcus Cooper" <coop85(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Engine trouble shoots/Update
Date: Nov 04, 2006
I've got some thoughts on two of your issues. The gascolator is no factor and I think very few (if any) are installing them on the -10. My DAR (a very experienced guy that runs an A&P university) said since our fuel sump drains are the absolute lowest point in the system then a gascolator wouldn't be of any benefit. Mostly important for high wing airplanes. On the prop control movement, I have a thought but it's not based on anything scientific. I have the same response, although not quite a full inch before the prop responds. Since the prop is in high RPM and therefore full flat, it's the throttle that's increasing the RPM, since we stop it at whatever RPM you do your run-up at, then you are going to have to move the prop control back far enough to get to the point where it would finally command less RPM than you already have. Even at 2200 RPM you have to move it a ways before anything happens since it would happily be allowing 2500-2700 depending on the engine if there was enough power available. Hope that makes sense. If not, perhaps you can just rest well knowing that it's all probably just fine. If you get the same response at a full power static run, then I would say something was amiss. Marcus 40286 - rapidly approaching 100 hours TT _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of DejaVu Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 7:33 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Engine trouble shoots/Update Thanks to all who chimed in. Ran the engine (0SMOH D4A5) again today with the help of a local mechanic. Below are updates, only item 3 is still problematic: 1. Fuel Pressure read 2.2psi at 1700rpm with boost pump off. 2.3psi with the boost pump on. A little low don't you think? Reprograming the EIS-6000 fixed it. 2. Mags check resulted in about 100rpm drop on both mags. Normal. Still the same 3. EGT on only #2 and #4 are high ~1500deg at 1700rpm. What up with this? Same reading today. The mechanic confirmed CHT's on #2 &4 are also higher than the rest. He felt for sure there's a small lint or something inside the #2 and #4 injector lines going to the fuel distributor on top of the engine. He was surprised that I don't have a gascolator. Anyone installed a gascolator? and where is a convenient place to put it that gives access for draining. And what kind of filter is that that came with Van's fuel pump (Fuel Flow Performance). i.e. do you need a gascolator on top of this filter? 4. When cycling the prop lever MAP does not decrease during the first inch as I was pulling the lever back. Is this normal? No update. 5. Pulling the mixture to idle cutoff resulted in no increase in rpm before the engine quits - engine runs lean. Richened the adjustment on the fuel servo one full turn in the direction of the "R-->"caused the engine to run rough and quit after a few seconds at 1700rpm. That was pro'ly too aggressive an adjustment but did I turn it in the correct direction? Yesterday I though the engine ran lean. Today the mechanic thought my engine rans rich. Minor leaning of the mixture resulted in a small 20rmp rise before the engine quits. I couldn't hear the 20rpm difference but he did. 6. Electrical system read 11.7V and -4Amp as measure by GRT EIS. Hall effect sensor is installed on battery side. Cycling ALT switch didn't appear to make a difference. Will check wiring. Loose plug on the back of the alternator. Didn't realize there's a locking tab on top of the plug to prevent it from backing out. It read 14.5V/4Amp today. Anh #141 ----- Original Message ----- From: Jesse Saint <mailto:jesse(at)itecusa.org> Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 10:29 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Engine trouble shoots From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Lenhardt" <av8or(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Cables and heat
Date: Nov 05, 2006
Another way to address the problem is to wrap the exhaust pipe/header with exhaust heat wrap. A friend of mine, who's also an A&P, found the lower cowling on his RV-9A was getting to hot from the exhaust pipes from the discoloring of the inside. He used exhaust/header heat wrap with great success. It's available at your local auto parts stores like Advance Auto, Auto Zone, etc. They come in various widths and lengths. He used the 1" x 50' roll for about $35. Here's a weblink to one: http://www.partsamerica.com/ProductDetail.aspx?categorycode=3638B&mfrco de=DEI&mfrpartnumber=010101 John Lenhardt #40262 ----- Original Message ----- From: zackrv8 To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 1:14 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Cables and heat Tim, Where my throttle/mixture cables get close to the exhaust on my RV8, I wrapped them in firesleeve. Definetly would be a bummer if these cables melted and were not able to move. Zack Tim(at)MyRV10.com wrote: > I got a good look around with my lower cowling off yesterday. > I haven't had it off in quite a while, so with a full spark > plug swap it was necessary and provided a good time to check > all of the very bottom areas that I've not checked as often. > > I found one thing and now have a suggestion. My prop governor > cable was about 2-3" from the exhaust, just on the front edge > of the heat muff area. You could tell from the sagging green > plastic that this cable had been quite warm at least once. > The cable still operates smoothly, so it seems to be ok. I'm > sure there's a nylon guide inside, which hopefully was protected > from additional heat stress by being surrounded by that steel > sheath. My quick fix was to wrap that area in aluminum tape > to provide some reflection of the heat. I think I should have > taken one more step though. I have some fiberous, very high > temp cloth that's about 1/8" thick. I should have wrapped > the cable with some of that, and THEN surrounded that with > the aluminum tape. > > My fuel lines don't get too close to the exhaust, but I noticed > when Vic had his top cowl off that he had a couple of heat > shields that he had made and attached with band clamps around > a couple areas of his exhaust. He had them near one of > the fuel lines, to provide that air gap heat shield for > protection for the lines. I think this would be a good idea > in a couple areas. So, as you're assembling the engine area, > take a good look at your exhaust and if anything is within > 3" of it, start thinking of how you can shield it. > I think it might even be nice to put additional shielding > for heat rejection on those firesleeved lines. > > -- > Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying -------- RV8 #80125 RV10 # 40512 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=72416#72416 com] On Behalf Of DejaVu Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 11:03 PM Subject: RV10-List: Engine trouble shoots Ran my engine again today with two new Slicks. Below is the summary. I would appreciate if anyone can provide insights to the troublesome numbers. 1. Fuel Pressure read 2.2psi at 1700rpm with boost pump off. 2.3psi with the boost pump on. A little low don't you think? If it truly is that number, that would definitely be a little low. My question would be, "are you absolutely sure you have the right sensor and the right sensor setting in your engine monitor?" Would the engine even start with this low of fuel pressure. 2. Mags check resulted in about 100rpm drop on both mags. Normal. This doesn't seem normal if your fuel pressure is truly 2.2PSI. Again, check that fuel pressure sensor. 3. EGT on only #2 and #4 are high ~1500deg at 1700rpm. What up with this? Try swapping sensors on 1&5 with 2&4 and see if you still get the same high readings. If so, then try hooking up the wires for 2 to the sensor for 6 (while it is still in 6) and see if it still reads that high. If so, then you either have bad sensors or bad wiring. 4. When cycling the prop lever MAP does not decrease during the first inch as I was pulling the lever back. Is this normal? No clue whatsoever. 5. Pulling the mixture to idle cutoff resulted in no increase in rpm before the engine quits - engine runs lean. Richened the adjustment on the fuel servo one full turn in the direction of the "R-->"caused the engine to run rough and quit after a few seconds at 1700rpm. That was pro'ly too aggressive an adjustment but did I turn it in the correct direction? 6. Electrical system read 11.7V and -4Amp as measure by GRT EIS. Hall effect sensor is installed on battery side. Cycling ALT switch didn't appear to make a difference. Will check wiring. The Alt field (as Van's calls it) switch makes about 3-5 Amps difference in my current draw on the Dynon ammeter shunt. Are you sure the alternator is working? If not, that would account for your low voltage, probably. You shouldn't be drawing 4 amps when the alternator is running, unless your sensor is in a place where you would see all current draw in the system not accounting for the amount of charging you are getting. We have ours setup between the battery and the bus/alternator (it sounds like this is where yours is) and it shows total/overall current into or out of the battery. BTW, she weighed in at 1625lbs. With or without the pilot? :-) Anh #141 http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List -- Release Date: 11/3/2006 -- 11/3/2006 href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com /Navigator?RV10-List ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Marcus Cooper" <coop85(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Cables and heat
Date: Nov 05, 2006
I used some similar stuff on my Q-2 a long time ago and have a question for the group. I was cautioned after the fact about the wrap possibly holding moisture and causing long term problems for the pipes. As I think about it, holding moisture on something that gets really stinkin' hot is somewhat doubtful in my mind but I was wondering if anyone else had hear similar or other concerns about wrapping the pipes. Thanks, Marcus 40286 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Lenhardt Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 6:34 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Cables and heat Another way to address the problem is to wrap the exhaust pipe/header with exhaust heat wrap. A friend of mine, who's also an A&P, found the lower cowling on his RV-9A was getting to hot from the exhaust pipes from the discoloring of the inside. He used exhaust/header heat wrap with great success. It's available at your local auto parts stores like Advance Auto, Auto Zone, etc. They come in various widths and lengths. He used the 1" x 50' roll for about $35. Here's a weblink to one: http://www.partsamerica.com/ProductDetail.aspx?categorycode=3638B <http://www.partsamerica.com/ProductDetail.aspx?categorycode=3638B&mfrcode=D EI&mfrpartnumber=010101> &mfrcode=DEI&mfrpartnumber=010101 John Lenhardt #40262 ----- Original Message ----- From: zackrv8 <mailto:zackrv8(at)verizon.net> Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 1:14 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Cables and heat Tim, Where my throttle/mixture cables get close to the exhaust on my RV8, I wrapped them in firesleeve. Definetly would be a bummer if these cables melted and were not able to move. Zack Tim(at)MyRV10.com wrote: > I got a good look around with my lower cowling off yesterday. > I haven't had it off in quite a while, so with a full spark > plug swap it was necessary and provided a good time to check > all of the very bottom areas that I've not checked as often. > > I found one thing and now have a suggestion. My prop governor > cable was about 2-3" from the exhaust, just on the front edge > of the heat muff area. You could tell from the sagging green > plastic that this cable had been quite warm at least once. > The cable still operates smoothly, so it seems to be ok. I'm > sure there's a nylon guide inside, which hopefully was protected > from additional heat stress by being surrounded by that steel > sheath. My quick fix was to wrap that area in aluminum tape > to provide some reflection of the heat. I think I should have > taken one more step though. I have some fiberous, very high > temp cloth that's about 1/8" thick. I should have wrapped > the cable with some of that, and THEN surrounded that with > the aluminum tape. > > My fuel lines don't get too close to the exhaust, but I noticed > when Vic had his top cowl off that he had a couple of heat > shields that he had made and attached with band clamps around > a couple areas of his exhaust. He had them near one of > the fuel lines, to provide that air gap heat shield for > protection for the lines. I think this would be a good idea > in a couple areas. So, as you're assembling the engine area, > take a good look at your exhaust and if anything is within > 3" of it, start thinking of how you can shield it. > I think it might even be nice to put additional shielding > for heat rejection on those firesleeved lines. > > -- > Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying -------- RV8 #80125 RV10 # 40512 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=72416#72416 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JSMcGrew(at)AOL.COM
Date: Nov 05, 2006
Subject: Re: Cables and heat
For what it's worth: I remember in the literature included with the Vetterman exhaust system, Larry warned against using automotive pipe wrap on his exhausts. Jim In a message dated 11/5/2006 8:13:00 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, coop85(at)bellsouth.net writes: I used some similar stuff on my Q-2 a long time ago and have a question for the group. I was cautioned after the fact about the wrap possibly holding moisture and causing long term problems for the pipes. As I think about it , holding moisture on something that gets really stinkin=99 hot is some what doubtful in my mind but I was wondering if anyone else had hear similar or other concerns about wrapping the pipes. Thanks, Marcus 40286 ____________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-se rver(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Lenhardt Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 6:34 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Cables and heat Another way to address the problem is to wrap the exhaust pipe/header with exhaust heat wrap. A friend of mine, who's also an A&P, found the lower cowling on his RV-9A was getting to hot from the exhaust pipes from the discoloring of the inside. He used exhaust/header heat wrap with great su ccess. It's available at your local auto parts stores like Advance Auto, Auto Zone, etc . They come in various widths and lengths. He used the 1" x 50' roll for about $35. Here's a weblink to one: _http://www.partsamerica.com/ProductDetail.aspx?categorycode=3638B&mfrcode =DEI&mfrpartnumber=010101_ (http://www.partsamerica.com/ProductDetail.aspx?categorycode=3638B&mfrcode =DEI&mfrpartnumber=010101) John Lenhardt #40262 ----- Original Message ----- From: _zackrv8_ (mailto:zackrv8(at)verizon.net) Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 1:14 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Cables and heat (mailto:zackrv8(at)verizon.net) > Tim, Where my throttle/mixture cables get close to the exhaust on my RV8, I wrapped them in firesleeve. Definetly would be a bummer if these cables me lted and were not able to move. Zack Tim(at)MyRV10.com wrote: > I got a good look around with my lower cowling off yesterday. > I haven't had it off in quite a while, so with a full spark > plug swap it was necessary and provided a good time to check > all of the very bottom areas that I've not checked as often. > > I found one thing and now have a suggestion. My prop governor > cable was about 2-3" from the exhaust, just on the front edge > of the heat muff area. You could tell from the sagging green > plastic that this cable had been quite warm at least once. > The cable still operates smoothly, so it seems to be ok. I'm > sure there's a nylon guide inside, which hopefully was protected > from additional heat stress by being surrounded by that steel > sheath. My quick fix was to wrap that area in aluminum tape > to provide some reflection of the heat. I think I should have > taken one more step though. I have some fiberous, very high > temp cloth that's about 1/8" thick. I should have wrapped > the cable with some of that, and THEN surrounded that with > the aluminum tape. > > My fuel lines don't get too close to the exhaust, but I noticed > when Vic had his top cowl off that he had a couple of heat > shields that he had made and attached with band clamps around > a couple areas of his exhaust. He had them near one of > the fuel lines, to provide that air gap heat shield for > protection for the lines. I think this would be a good idea > in a couple areas. So, as you're assembling the engine area, > take a good look at your exhaust and if anything is within > 3" of it, start thinking of how you can shield it. > I think it might even be nice to put additional shielding > for heat rejection on those firesleeved lines. > > -- > Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying -------- RV8 #80125 RV10 # 40512 Read this topic online here: _http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=72416#72416_ (http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=72416#72416) www.aeroelectric.com www.kitlog.com http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List m/) l dersbooks.com/) (http://www.homebuilthelp.com/) (http://www.matronics.com/contribution) (http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List) Jim "Scooter" McGrew _http://www.mit.edu/~jsmcgrew_ (http://www.mit.edu/~jsmcgrew) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DejaVu" <wvu(at)ameritel.net>
Subject: Fuel Selector Valve Operation
Date: Nov 05, 2006
I have a stock selector valve. Fuel lines were installed by the book, expecting that the lever would operate pointing upward. i.e. up and left for left tank, up and right for right tank. I expected that it would also work with it pointing down and left or right. Well, I only get good fuel flow with it pointing down/left and down/right. I thought the design was simply two tunnels in the valve shaft in a "+" shape so that it would work in any of the four positions. Any idea why it didn't work pointing upward? Anh #141 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Cables and heat
From: "zackrv8" <zackrv8(at)verizon.net>
Date: Nov 05, 2006
Scooter, Roger that. I talked to Larry on the phone for about 15 minutes on this very subject. He is totally against wrapping the pipes and also against coating the pipes. I can't remember the exact converstaion (it was before LOE 2006), but it has something to do with the pipes being a heat sink on an aircooled engine. Zack quote="ScooterF15"]For what it's worth: I remember in the literature included with the Vetterman exhaust system, Larry warned against using automotive pipe wrap on his exhausts. Jim In a message dated 11/5/2006 8:13:00 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, coop85(at)bellsouth.net writes: [quote] I used some similar stuff on my Q-2 a long time ago and have a question for the group. I was cautioned after the fact about the wrap possibly holding moisture and causing long term problems for the pipes. As I think about it, holding moisture on something that gets really stinkin hot is somewhat doubtful in my mind but I was wondering if anyone else had hear similar or other concerns about wrapping the pipes. Thanks, Marcus 40286 From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Lenhardt Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 6:34 PM Subject: Re: Re: Cables and heat Another way to address the problem is to wrap the exhaust pipe/header with exhaust heat wrap.? A friend of mine, who's also an A&P, found the lower cowling on his RV-9A was getting to hot from the exhaust pipes from the discoloring of the inside. He used exhaust/header heat wrap with great success. It's available at your local auto parts stores like Advance Auto, Auto Zone, etc. They come in various widths and lengths. He used the 1" x 50' roll for about $35. Here's a weblink to one: http://www.partsamerica.com/ProductDetail.aspx?categorycode=3638B&mfrcode=DEI&mfrpartnumber=010101 (http://www.partsamerica.com/ProductDetail.aspx?categorycode=3638B&mfrcode=DEI&mfrpartnumber=010101) John Lenhardt #40262 > > --- -------- RV8 #80125 RV10 # 40512 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=72512#72512 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fuel Selector Valve Operation
From: "zackrv8" <zackrv8(at)verizon.net>
Date: Nov 05, 2006
Deja, I think the "pointer" end of the fuel slector valve that comes with Van's kits is supposed to filed down (not totally sure though). The longer "handle" end becomes your handle AND pointer. Of course, I have an Andair valve and am not totally sure if this is correct. Zack quote="wvu(at)ameritel.net"]I have a stock selector valve. Fuel lines were installed by the book, expecting that the lever would operate pointing upward. i.e. up and left for left tank, up and right for right tank. I expected that it would also work with it pointing down and left or right. Well, I only get good fuel flow with it pointing down/left and down/right. I thought the design was simply two tunnels in the valve shaft in a "+" shape so that it would work in any of the four positions. Any idea why it didn't work pointing upward? Anh #141 > [b] -------- RV8 #80125 RV10 # 40512 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=72513#72513 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steven DiNieri" <capsteve(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: aileron throw
Date: Nov 06, 2006
Can anyone (rv10) with their wings on tell me how much throw is in the control stick in the aileron direction? Probably be easiest to just measure from left sidewall to the stick deflected to the left and the distance from the left sidewall to the stick with right deflection of aileron. I'm scratch building a panel and need to ensure clearance.. thx Steve d 40205 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 06, 2006
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Wow, Cool! New List Feature... [Please Read]
Dear Listers, By popular suggestion, I've written a substantial new code module for the Matronics Email Lists system. Here's how it works... During each November, I send out quite a few PBS-like "Please make a Contribution to support your List" emails. Wouldn't it be cool if, once a member made a Contribution, they didn't have to receive my support pleas anymore for the rest of that year? Well, that's exactly what I've written! Following this posting, anyone that makes a List Contribution in 2006 will no longer receive my Contribution Pleas for the rest of the year! The best part is this not only applies to the Realtime distribution, but also the Digest distribution! For those that have made a Contribution, the Daily Digest email-version will be invisibly stripped of my requests as well! (Note that my requests will still be present in the online versions of the Digests, List Browse, and on the Forum site.) For those submitting their Contribution by personal Check, please be sure to include your email address along with your Check as this is what is used to determine eligibility. So, in a nutshell, here's how it works: Make a Contribution = No more "Please Make a Contribution" messages! How sweet is that? If that's not a great reason to jump on the Matronics Email List Contribution site and make your donation today, I don't know what is! Don't forget that there are some totally awesome free gifts to be had along with your List Contribution this year!! Don't wait a minute longer to support your Lists! http://www.matronics.com/contribution Thank you for your Support!! Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator ________________________________________________________________________________
From: EAAINC(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 06, 2006
Subject: Turbo Subaru
We flew the turbocharged Subaru H-6 yesterday. Lots of power. Maintained 1800 fpm to 10,000 feet. The Turbo is sized for 30" to 14,000 feet. Jan ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 06, 2006
From: Werner Schneider <glastar(at)gmx.net>
Subject: Re: Turbo Subaru
Hi Jan, sounds great, what aircraft was it in, what was your TOFF weight? Thx Werner EAAINC(at)aol.com wrote: > We flew the turbocharged Subaru H-6 yesterday. Lots of power. > Maintained 1800 fpm to 10,000 feet. The Turbo is sized for 30" to > 14,000 feet. > > Jan > >* > > >* > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: JSMcGrew(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 06, 2006
Subject: Re: aileron throw
Steve, I don't have my airplane handy, but I want to point out that I had to cut around 3 or 4 inches off the top of each stick for clearance reasons. That makes a big difference in clearance. Make sure that you take that into account when someone gives you a full left to full right measurement. Jim In a message dated 11/6/2006 2:12:47 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, capsteve(at)adelphia.net writes: --> RV10-List message posted by: "Steven DiNieri" Can anyone (rv10) with their wings on tell me how much throw is in the control stick in the aileron direction? Probably be easiest to just measure from left sidewall to the stick deflected to the left and the distance from the left sidewall to the stick with right deflection of aileron. I'm scratch building a panel and need to ensure clearance.. thx Steve d 40205 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Jim "Scooter" McGrew _http://www.mit.edu/~jsmcgrew_ (http://www.mit.edu/~jsmcgrew) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 06, 2006
From: Nikolaos Napoli <owl40188(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Baggage Door Hinge
I was going to rivet the Baggage Door Hinge Frame to the Side Skins this we ekend and noticed that once I do this it will be difficult to install the d oor and get the door hinge wire in place. It looks like on my installation once the door is installed one can't pull out the hinge wire. In fact I n eed to install the door hinge wire and door prior to riveting the door hing e frame. Is this typicall to what other builders experienced?=0A=0Athanks =0A =0ANiko=0A40188 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jesse Saint" <jesse(at)itecusa.org>
Subject: Baggage Door Hinge
Date: Nov 06, 2006
The design and the plans have it so the top of the hinge sticks out just a little bit so you can pull the pin from the top. It is all sits flush, you will have a very hard time removing the pin, which is what you are saying, I think. You might want to check the plans and make sure you didn=92t misread the way you were supposed to install it. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. HYPERLINK "mailto:jesse(at)itecusa.org"jesse(at)itecusa.org HYPERLINK "http://www.itecusa.org"www.itecusa.org W: 352-465-4545 C: 352-427-0285 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Nikolaos Napoli Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 9:40 AM Subject: RV10-List: Baggage Door Hinge I was going to rivet the Baggage Door Hinge Frame to the Side Skins this weekend and noticed that once I do this it will be difficult to install the door and get the door hinge wire in place. It looks like on my installation once the door is installed one can't pull out the hinge wire. In fact I need to install the door hinge wire and door prior to riveting the door hinge frame. Is this typicall to what other builders experienced? thanks Niko 40188 "http://www.aeroelectric.com"www.aeroelectric.com "http://www.buildersbooks.com"www.buildersbooks.com "http://www.kitlog.com"www.kitlog.com "http://www.homebuilthelp.com"www.homebuilthelp.com "http://www.matronics.com/contribution"http://www.matronics.com/contribut ion "http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List"http://www.matronics.com/Na vig ator?RV10-List 11/4/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. 11/4/2006 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Gonzalez" <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com>
Subject: Turbo Subaru
Date: Nov 06, 2006
Good news. John >From: EAAINC(at)aol.com >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV10-List: Turbo Subaru >Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 05:42:55 EST > >We flew the turbocharged Subaru H-6 yesterday. Lots of power. Maintained >1800 fpm to 10,000 feet. The Turbo is sized for 30" to 14,000 feet. > >Jan ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 06, 2006
From: Rick <ricksked(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Baggage Door Hinge
Niko, Don't know if my first response went through, Ditto for me, I had to keep the pin in the hinge to install the door but my install is pretty clean with nice, small rounded openings top and bottom. I followed the directions to a TEE so I'm not sure why we are different than others. If in the future I need to remove the door I'll have to open the top enough to remove the hinge pin. I'm not worried about wear so much and I polished the hinge parts prior to installing. I never planned to paint the hinge because of paint peeling/chipping I have seen on other hinges. Rick S. 40185 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 06, 2006
From: Nikolaos Napoli <owl40188(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Baggage Door Hinge
Jesse and Rob thanks yor your replies=0A=0AIt looked like I would have an e asier time inserting the pin from the bottom rather than the top, however, obviously this would not be acceptable as the pin could fall out during fli ght. My hinge does stick out just a slight bit but it sticks out about the same amount top and bottom. I didn't see anything in the manual talking a bout this. Well I can always cut the hinge if I need to take it out. Mayb e a light thinning of the diameter and some lubricating oil would get it in /out. =0A=0AThanks=0A =0ANiko=0A40188=0A=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message -- --=0AFrom: Jesse Saint <jesse(at)itecusa.org>=0ATo: rv10-list(at)matronics.com=0A Sent: Monday, November 6, 2006 10:01:35 AM=0ASubject: RE: RV10-List: Baggag e Door Hinge=0A=0A=0AThe design and the plans have it so the top of the hin ge sticks out just a little bit so you can pull the pin from the top. It i s all sits flush, you will have a very hard time removing the pin, which is what you are saying, I think. You might want to check the plans and make sure you didn=A2t misread the way you were supposed to install it.=0A =0AJe sse Saint=0AI-TEC, Inc.=0Ajesse(at)itecusa.org=0Awww.itecusa.org=0AW: 352-465- 4545=0AC: 352-427-0285=0A=0A=0A=0AFrom: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.co m [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Nikolaos Napol i=0ASent: Monday, November 06, 2006 9:40 AM=0ATo: Matronics=0ASubject: RV10 -List: Baggage Door Hinge=0A =0AI was going to rivet the Baggage Door Hinge Frame to the Side Skins this weekend and noticed that once I do this it wi ll be difficult to install the door and get the door hinge wire in place. It looks like on my installation once the door is installed one can't pull out the hinge wire. In fact I need to install the door hinge wire and door prior to riveting the door hinge frame. Is this typicall to what other bu ilders experienced?=0A =0Athanks=0A =0ANiko=0A40188=0A =0A =0A=0A=0A=0Aww w.aeroelectric.com=0Awww.kitlog.com=0A=0A=0A=0A=0Ahttp://www.matronics.com/ Navigator?RV10-List=0A =0A-- Release Date: 11/4/2006 =0A=0A--=0ANo virus f ================= ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rick Gray" <rickgray(at)roadrunner.com>
Subject: Re: Baggage Door Hinge
Date: Nov 06, 2006
OK....here's 2 options that I came up with that will allow EASY removal of the door with NO RISK of scratching the paint on the airplane: 1-install the cabin side of the hinge with platenuts....when/if you need to remove the door you simply remove the platenut screws and the door comes off WITH BOTH SIDES of the hinge....savvy?? 2-drill a 3/32 hole in the longeron ABOVE the hinge pin. Make the pin longer than it needs to be and you can easily remove the pin from INSIDE the airplane. The small portion of the pin inside can be 'dressed up', hidden, or covered by the headliner...your choice.....savvy?? Either option above allows you to recess the hinge more than the plans....read: your hinge is NOT hangin' out in the breeze. Again...NO CHANCE of scratching airplane paint. I chose option 2 and am very pleased with the result. No charge for this one :^). Rick in Ohio at the Buffalo Farm - too many projects to list - RV10 nearing completion http://rv6rick.tripod.com/ohiovalleyrvators/ ----- Original Message ----- From: Nikolaos Napoli To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 11:46 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Baggage Door Hinge Jesse and Rob thanks yor your replies It looked like I would have an easier time inserting the pin from the bottom rather than the top, however, obviously this would not be acceptable as the pin could fall out during flight. My hinge does stick out just a slight bit but it sticks out about the same amount top and bottom. I didn't see anything in the manual talking about this. Well I can always cut the hinge if I need to take it out. Maybe a light thinning of the diameter and some lubricating oil would get it in/out. Thanks Niko 40188 ----- Original Message ---- From: Jesse Saint <jesse(at)itecusa.org> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, November 6, 2006 10:01:35 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Baggage Door Hinge The design and the plans have it so the top of the hinge sticks out just a little bit so you can pull the pin from the top. It is all sits flush, you will have a very hard time removing the pin, which is what you are saying, I think. You might want to check the plans and make sure you didn=A2t misread the way you were supposed to install it. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse(at)itecusa.org www.itecusa.org W: 352-465-4545 C: 352-427-0285 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Nikolaos Napoli Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 9:40 AM To: Matronics Subject: RV10-List: Baggage Door Hinge I was going to rivet the Baggage Door Hinge Frame to the Side Skins this weekend and noticed that once I do this it will be difficult to install the door and get the door hinge wire in place. It looks like on my installation once the door is installed one can't pull out the hinge wire. In fact I need to install the door hinge wire and door prior to riveting the door hinge frame. Is this typicall to what other builders experienced? thanks Niko 40188 www.aeroelectric.comwww.kitlog.comhttp://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10 -List -- Release Date: 11/4/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. 11/4/2006 www.aeroelbuildersbooks.com/" target=_blank rel=nofollow>www.buildersbooks.comwwA href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List" target=_blank rel====== ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: seat belts and airbags
Date: Nov 06, 2006
I received an email from my AMSAFE contact regarding development of an airbag system for the RV10. My aircraft is setup for the four point inertial belts for all four seats. They are considering working with my aircraft for the airbag solution. After looking at their PDF of their system it is apparent that the most probable solution would be a three point airbag system for front seat occupants. Their timeframe for development is 2nd quarter 2007. Unlike the Cirrus (four point inertial harness) our seats are not designed to carry the compressed inflator bottles or the sensors internally. I will keep the list advise if and when there is any activity. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <mgeans(at)provide.net>
Subject: Enjoy a laugh
Date: Nov 06, 2006
All, Since some postings have not always been directly about building I was reviewing some mail and found this exerpt that just might let us all forget our stresses for a moment. Enjoy, Matt Geans Builder Wanna-be After every Qantas Airlines flight, pilots complete a gripe sheet which conveys to the mechanics problems encountered with the aircraft during the flight that need repair or correction. The form used is a piece of paper on which the pilot completes the top part listing the problem, which the mechanics read and then respond in writing on the lower half of the form what remedial action was taken, so the pilot on the next flight of that plane can review the formbefore taking off. > Never let it be said that ground crews and engineers lack a sense of humor. Here are some actual logged maintenance complaints and responses with P = the problem logged by the pilot, S = the solution and action taken by engineers. Qantas, by the way, is the only major airline that has never had an accident. > > > P: Left inside main tyre almost needs replacement. > S: Almost replaced left inside main tyre. > > P: Test flight OK, except auto-land very rough. > S: Auto-land not installed on this aircraft. > > P: Something loose in cockpit. > S: Something tightened in cockpit. > > P: Dead bugs on windshield. > S: Live bugs on back-order. > > P: Autopilot in altitude -hold mode produces a 200 feet > per minute > descent. > S: Cannot reproduce problem on ground. > > P: Evidence of leak on right main landing gear. > S: Evidence removed. > > P: DME volume unbelievably loud. > S: DME volume set to more believable level. > > P: Friction locks cause throttle levers to stick. > S: That's what they' re there for. > > P: IFF inoperative. > S: IFF always inoperative in OFF mode. > > P: Suspected crack in windshield. > S: Suspect you're right. > > P: Number 3 engine missing. > S: Engine found on right wing after brief search. > > P: Aircraft handles funny. > S: Aircraft warned to straighten up, fly right and be > serious. > > P: Target radar hums. > S: Reprogrammed target radar with lyrics. > > P: Mouse in cockpit. > S: Cat installed ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Sipp" <rsipp(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: uneven tire wear
Date: Nov 06, 2006
Because of the tilt (camber?) that the main gear assumes in flight, the outboard portion of the tire always contacts the runway first on touchdown and spin up. This characteristic of wearing the outboard portion of main tires is common to all RVs. More tire life can be had by rotating or "flipping" the tires on the rim once or twice during the life of the tire. Dick Sipp 40065 finishing ----- Original Message ----- From: David McNeill To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 3:12 PM Subject: RV10-List: uneven tire wear For the flying 10s: Are the tires wearing evenly? Any uneven wear on the outboard edges of the mains? Trying to get some idea whether the toein for the 10 is properly set by the factory legs and pilot holes. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Night before the big election - Flutter Article
Date: Nov 06, 2006
From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com>
R3JlYXQgYXJ0aWNsZSBvbiBQYWdlcyA5OC0xMDEgb2YgdGhlIFNlcHRlbWJlciAyMDA2LCBhZGRp dGlvbiBvZiBTcG9ydCBBdmlhdGlvbi4gIE9uZSBwYXNzYWdlIEkgZm91bmQgb2YgdmFsdWUgd2Fz IOKAnFdoYXQgc29tZSBwaWxvdHMgYW5kIGFpcmNyYWZ0IG93bmVycyBtYXkgbm90IHJlYWxpemUg aXMgdGhhdCBzaW1wbHkgcmVwYWludGluZyBjYW4gYWRkIHN1ZmZpY2llbnQgd2VpZ2h0IHRvIHVu YmFsYW5jZSB0aGUgcnVkZGVydmF0b3JzIGFuZCBtYWtlIHRoZW0gc3VzY2VwdGlibGUgdG8gZmx1 dHRlcuKAnS4gIFdlIGxlYXJuZWQgaW4gc2Nob29sIHRoYXQgYWxsIGNvbnRyb2wgc3VyZmFjZXMg QUxXQVlTIGdldCBiYWxhbmNlZCBhZnRlciBwYWludC4NCg0KSSBjb250aW51ZSB0byB0YWtlIGV4 Y2VwdGlvbiB0byB0aGUgcG9zaXRpb24gdGhhdCBWQU5TIGFpcmNyYWZ0IGRvIG5vdCBuZWVkIHRv IGJlIGJhbGFuY2VkIGFuZCBpZ25vcmluZyB0aGF0IFBhcnQgMTQ3IGFkdmlzZSBpcyBva2F5Lg0K DQpXb3J0aHkgb2YgY29uc2lkZXJhdGlvbiBldmVuIGlmIHlvdSBndXlzIGFyZW7igJl0IHBvc3Rp bmcgYW55IGFja25vd2xlZGdtZW50Lg0KDQpKb2huIENveA0KIzQwNjAwDQoNCg= ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Gonzalez" <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com>
Subject: Night before the big election - Flutter Article
Date: Nov 06, 2006
Thank you for the reminder even if your message was only found in the beginning of your subject. Who could forget! JOhn G. >From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: RV10-List: Night before the big election - Flutter Article >Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 18:35:19 -0800 > >Great article on Pages 98-101 of the September 2006, addition of Sport >Aviation. One passage I found of value was What some pilots and >aircraft owners may not realize is that simply repainting can add >sufficient weight to unbalance the ruddervators and make them susceptible >to flutter. We learned in school that all control surfaces ALWAYS get >balanced after paint. > >I continue to take exception to the position that VANS aircraft do not need >to be balanced and ignoring that Part 147 advise is okay. > >Worthy of consideration even if you guys arent posting any >acknowledgment. > >John Cox >#40600 > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ddddsp1(at)juno.com" <ddddsp1(at)juno.com>
Date: Nov 07, 2006
Subject: Slime HS
Anyone ever used SLIME HS from Sherwin-Williams to protect your windows when painting your plane? You spray it on and it dries to a protective film.............then wash it off when done painting. Was wondering if it would provide protection when glueing the window in also..........pro tect against accidental drips/runs of Weld-on. It is a bluish green liquid and comes in a gal. bottle. Dean 40449 ________________________________________________________________________

Anyone ever used SLIME HS from Sherwin-Williams to protect your windows when painting your plane?  You spray it on and it dries to a protective film.............then wash it off when done painting.  ; Was wondering if it would provide protection when glueing the window i n also..........protect against accidental drips/runs of Weld-on.

It is a bluish green liquid and comes in a gal. bottle.

Dean 40449



______________________ __________________________________________________
Visit http://www.juno.com/value to sign up today!

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Night before the big election - Flutter Article
Date: Nov 06, 2006
From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com>
I'm sure trying. JC -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Gonzalez Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 7:22 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Night before the big election - Flutter Article Thank you for the reminder even if your message was only found in the beginning of your subject. Who could forget! JOhn G. >From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: RV10-List: Night before the big election - Flutter Article >Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 18:35:19 -0800 > >Great article on Pages 98-101 of the September 2006, addition of Sport >Aviation. One passage I found of value was What some pilots and >aircraft owners may not realize is that simply repainting can add >sufficient weight to unbalance the ruddervators and make them susceptible >to flutter. We learned in school that all control surfaces ALWAYS get >balanced after paint. > >I continue to take exception to the position that VANS aircraft do not need >to be balanced and ignoring that Part 147 advise is okay. > >Worthy of consideration even if you guys arent posting any >acknowledgment. > >John Cox >#40600 > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 06, 2006
From: Rick <ricksked(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Night before the big election - Flutter Article
"Orange dot on the tire"....Where the valve stem exits the rim right? Rick S. 40185 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2006
From: Link McGarity <wv4i(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: aileron throwaileron throw
Sorry, but I have to chime in with John C. on this one. You should NEVER have restricted control movement by design. While it is true that the control stick box, rudder travel for that matter, is/are normally rather confined, especially at higher airpspeeds, there ARE situations, and in other than aerobatic flight, where full control movement may be required. I encourage anyone considering restricted control movement, by design, to give this latter point serious consideration. Example, and on the lighter side, a wake turbulence encounter.... A neighbor, the other day, reported substantial wake turbulence and control recovery effort after being "thumped" by an F-15 whilst on final to our airport. What TFR? What presidential visit in progress some 12-15nm away, hi? Intercept procedures and required response, huh? Anyway, point is to always consider the unexpected, and in this case the need for full control authority, always. Link McGarity #40622 elevators RV6/N42GF/flying, non builder ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Sargeant" <k5wiv(at)amsat.org>
Subject: Enjoy a laugh
Date: Nov 07, 2006
And then I don't remember the gripes (it's been almost 45 years), but there were the write-ups: "short between the headset." and "Loose nut on the control stick." Jack & Cecilia Sargeant 1127 Patricia St. Wichita, KS 67208-2642 316/683-5268 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of mgeans(at)provide.net Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 6:46 PM Subject: RV10-List: Enjoy a laugh All, Since some postings have not always been directly about building I was reviewing some mail and found this exerpt that just might let us all forget our stresses for a moment. Enjoy, Matt Geans Builder Wanna-be After every Qantas Airlines flight, pilots complete a gripe sheet which conveys to the mechanics problems encountered with the aircraft during the flight that need repair or correction. The form used is a piece of paper on which the pilot completes the top part listing the problem, which the mechanics read and then respond in writing on the lower half of the form what remedial action was taken, so the pilot on the next flight of that plane can review the formbefore taking off. > Never let it be said that ground crews and engineers lack a sense of humor. Here are some actual logged maintenance complaints and responses with P = the problem logged by the pilot, S = the solution and action taken by engineers. Qantas, by the way, is the only major airline that has never had an accident. > > > P: Left inside main tyre almost needs replacement. > S: Almost replaced left inside main tyre. > > P: Test flight OK, except auto-land very rough. > S: Auto-land not installed on this aircraft. > > P: Something loose in cockpit. > S: Something tightened in cockpit. > > P: Dead bugs on windshield. > S: Live bugs on back-order. > > P: Autopilot in altitude -hold mode produces a 200 feet > per minute > descent. > S: Cannot reproduce problem on ground. > > P: Evidence of leak on right main landing gear. > S: Evidence removed. > > P: DME volume unbelievably loud. > S: DME volume set to more believable level. > > P: Friction locks cause throttle levers to stick. > S: That's what they' re there for. > > P: IFF inoperative. > S: IFF always inoperative in OFF mode. > > P: Suspected crack in windshield. > S: Suspect you're right. > > P: Number 3 engine missing. > S: Engine found on right wing after brief search. > > P: Aircraft handles funny. > S: Aircraft warned to straighten up, fly right and be > serious. > > P: Target radar hums. > S: Reprogrammed target radar with lyrics. > > P: Mouse in cockpit. > S: Cat installed ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Douglas" <bsponcil(at)belinblank.org>
Subject: Re: Turbo Subaru
Date: Nov 07, 2006
Typical Eggenfellner. What could be an interesting and in depth write up is instead so terse it's nearly useless. Just my $.02 -Brian #40497 N211BD Iowa City, IA ----- Original Message ----- From: EAAINC(at)aol.com To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 4:42 AM Subject: RV10-List: Turbo Subaru We flew the turbocharged Subaru H-6 yesterday. Lots of power. Maintained 1800 fpm to 10,000 feet. The Turbo is sized for 30" to 14,000 feet. Jan ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2006
From: Nikolaos Napoli <owl40188(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Firewall Insulation Adhesive
Well its time to put in the Firewall insulation I got from Flightline Inter iors. Any suggestions on what adhesive to use? I am going to use the alum inum tape that Spruce sells around the edges.=0A=0AThanks=0A =0ANiko=0A4018 8 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Ritter" <mritter509(at)msn.com>
Subject: Slime HS
Date: Nov 07, 2006
I used Spray Lat purchased from A/S and it worked great. You put it on with a paint brush(thick) and then just peel it off when you have finished working with the plexiglas. Mark (N410MR Flying) >From: "ddddsp1(at)juno.com" <ddddsp1(at)juno.com> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV10-List: Slime HS >Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 03:26:13 GMT > >Anyone ever used SLIME HS from Sherwin-Williams to protect your windows >when painting your plane? You spray it on and it dries to a protective >film.............then wash it off when done painting. Was wondering if it >would provide protection when glueing the window in also..........protect >against accidental drips/runs of Weld-on. >It is a bluish green liquid and comes in a gal. bottle. >Dean 40449 > > >________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ Add a Yahoo! contact to Windows Live Messenger for a chance to win a free trip! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Jessen" <jjessen(at)rcn.com>
Subject: Before closing up the top of the TailconeBefore closing
up the top of the Tailcone
Date: Nov 07, 2006
So, is there a reason to locate where Russ has done, or to locate behind the F-1007, further away from the battery? I'm trying to keep the area above the battery free for a future hat shelf, but don't want to place things too far aft if there is a reason one should keep the AHRS and magnetometer closer to, say, the mid of the plane. If either is back further into the tailcone, could that mess up their readings? John Jessen 40328 (closing the tailcone as soon as I locate the shelf for the AHRS/magnetometer) _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Russell Daves Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:55 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Before closing up the top of the TailconeBefore closing up the top of the Tailcone I installed my most forward cross member as close to the F-1006 as possible, and just behind the bolts joining the F-1046 and F-1032 Longerons together, almost directly above the battery. I have had no problems with interference, except where I failed to use brass bolts and washers to install the magnameter onto the shelf. Since the duel AHRS and magnameters are all on a shelf next to each other in the center of the fuselage the left and right seat belt cables just cross above the cross members and are no problem. If you were to install the AHRS or magnameter next to the fuselage side wall they could cause interference. Best regards, Russ Daves N710RV flying "http://www.aeroelectric.com"www.aeroelectric.com "http://www.buildersbooks.com"www.buildersbooks.com "http://www.kitlog.com"www.kitlog.com "http://www.homebuilthelp.com"www.homebuilthelp.com "http://www.matronics.com/contribution"http://www.matronics.com/contribution "http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List"http://www.matronics.com/Navig ator?RV10-List -- No virus found in this outgoing message. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Gonzalez" <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: aileron throwaileron throw
Date: Nov 07, 2006
I am not arguing with any of this, but I also remember that airbus accident where the VS spar failed was also I believe due to wake turbulance and full rudder deflection by the pilot. This is how I remember the report. I think I would like to have the full range of throws, but one has to be careful at high speeds and turbulent conditions. Being an RCer, I have stalled high performance slope sailplanes at high speed due to putting too much up elevator too fast. It is an amazing thing to witness. The electronic radios have dual rates and things like that to accomodate this stuff. John G. >From: Link McGarity <wv4i(at)bellsouth.net> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV10-List: aileron throwaileron throw >Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 05:09:05 -0500 > > >Sorry, but I have to chime in with John C. on this one. You should NEVER >have restricted control movement by design. While it is true that the >control stick box, rudder travel for that matter, is/are normally rather >confined, especially at higher airpspeeds, there ARE situations, and in >other than aerobatic flight, where full control movement may be required. I >encourage anyone considering restricted control movement, by design, to >give this latter point serious consideration. > >Example, and on the lighter side, a wake turbulence encounter.... A >neighbor, the other day, reported substantial wake turbulence and control >recovery effort after being "thumped" by an F-15 whilst on final to our >airport. What TFR? What presidential visit in progress some 12-15nm away, >hi? Intercept procedures and required response, huh? >Anyway, point is to always consider the unexpected, and in this case the >need for full control authority, always. > >Link McGarity >#40622 elevators >RV6/N42GF/flying, non builder > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Douglas" <bsponcil(at)belinblank.org>
Subject: RV10 vs PA-28-235
Date: Nov 07, 2006
I went flying with a buddy of mine last week in his 235HP Pathfinder. On our way back from a $100 pulled pork sandwich, we had the benefit of a strong tailwind and my friend noted, with some satisfaction, that we were doing 180knots over the ground. Hmmmm, I thought. An RV-10 with the same engine would almost fly as fast in a still wind. I should also point out that my friend's pathfinder has EVERY speed mod you can buy (gap seals, fancy pants, wing fairings, etc). So the question is, given the same power and nearly identical size/weight, how come the -10 is 30-40 knots faster than the cherokee 235? Is the wing just THAT more efficient? Is it the cowl? Flush rivets? Prop? Combination of all four? Even more surprising is the fact that you seemingly don't have to pay a price for that speed advantage. The RV-10 lands shorter, takes off shorter, climbs as fast and yet has more interior space. Amazing. -Brian #40497 N211BD Iowa City, IA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jdalton77" <jdalton77(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: RV10 vs PA-28-235
Date: Nov 07, 2006
All of the above? Add 25HP, a more efficient wing, a lighter plane, and flush rivets and it will go way faster. Who knew? (obviously Van did) JEFF ----- Original Message ----- From: Brian Douglas To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:54 AM Subject: RV10-List: RV10 vs PA-28-235 I went flying with a buddy of mine last week in his 235HP Pathfinder. On our way back from a $100 pulled pork sandwich, we had the benefit of a strong tailwind and my friend noted, with some satisfaction, that we were doing 180knots over the ground. Hmmmm, I thought. An RV-10 with the same engine would almost fly as fast in a still wind. I should also point out that my friend's pathfinder has EVERY speed mod you can buy (gap seals, fancy pants, wing fairings, etc). So the question is, given the same power and nearly identical size/weight, how come the -10 is 30-40 knots faster than the cherokee 235? Is the wing just THAT more efficient? Is it the cowl? Flush rivets? Prop? Combination of all four? Even more surprising is the fact that you seemingly don't have to pay a price for that speed advantage. The RV-10 lands shorter, takes off shorter, climbs as fast and yet has more interior space. Amazing. -Brian #40497 N211BD Iowa City, IA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jdalton77" <jdalton77(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Turbo Subaru
Date: Nov 07, 2006
Maybe, but it's enough to make some of us look at it further. Jeff ----- Original Message ----- From: Brian Douglas To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:06 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Turbo Subaru Typical Eggenfellner. What could be an interesting and in depth write up is instead so terse it's nearly useless. Just my $.02 -Brian #40497 N211BD Iowa City, IA ----- Original Message ----- From: EAAINC(at)aol.com To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 4:42 AM Subject: RV10-List: Turbo Subaru We flew the turbocharged Subaru H-6 yesterday. Lots of power. Maintained 1800 fpm to 10,000 feet. The Turbo is sized for 30" to 14,000 feet. Jan href="http://www.aeroelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com href="http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com href="http://www.kitlog.com">www.kitlog.com href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronic s.com/Navigator?RV10-List ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rene Felker" <rene(at)felker.com>
Subject: aileron throwaileron throw
Date: Nov 07, 2006
The Airbus accident is a good example what I thought is true and what is really true. Before that accident, I believed that if I was flying below maneuvering speed that I did not have to worry about damaging my certified airplane with full control movements.......what I know now (at least as far as the rudder is concerned) is that the certification requirements are for the rudder to be able to go from the neutral position to full left or full right......not from full left to full right (or the other way around). Either way, I will make sure that my stick does not strike the panel or has any possibility of getting stuck underneath. Rene' Felker -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Gonzalez Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 8:52 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: aileron throwaileron throw I am not arguing with any of this, but I also remember that airbus accident where the VS spar failed was also I believe due to wake turbulance and full rudder deflection by the pilot. This is how I remember the report. I think I would like to have the full range of throws, but one has to be careful at high speeds and turbulent conditions. Being an RCer, I have stalled high performance slope sailplanes at high speed due to putting too much up elevator too fast. It is an amazing thing to witness. The electronic radios have dual rates and things like that to accomodate this stuff. John G. >From: Link McGarity <wv4i(at)bellsouth.net> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV10-List: aileron throwaileron throw >Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 05:09:05 -0500 > > >Sorry, but I have to chime in with John C. on this one. You should NEVER >have restricted control movement by design. While it is true that the >control stick box, rudder travel for that matter, is/are normally rather >confined, especially at higher airpspeeds, there ARE situations, and in >other than aerobatic flight, where full control movement may be required. I >encourage anyone considering restricted control movement, by design, to >give this latter point serious consideration. > >Example, and on the lighter side, a wake turbulence encounter.... A >neighbor, the other day, reported substantial wake turbulence and control >recovery effort after being "thumped" by an F-15 whilst on final to our >airport. What TFR? What presidential visit in progress some 12-15nm away, >hi? Intercept procedures and required response, huh? >Anyway, point is to always consider the unexpected, and in this case the >need for full control authority, always. > >Link McGarity >#40622 elevators >RV6/N42GF/flying, non builder > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2006
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Slime HS
I'd also like to hear from anyone who's used this or any other 'REMOVABLE' coating to protect their plexi during the install process. there was a thread posted recently about a builder that had developed optical 'waves' after removing some scratched incurred during the install. I'm nearing this step/s and have a selfish interest. Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ ddddsp1(at)juno.com wrote: > Anyone ever used SLIME HS from Sherwin-Williams to protect your > windows when painting your plane? You spray it on and it dries to a > protective film.............then wash it off when done painting. Was > wondering if it would provide protection when glueing the window in > also..........protect against accidental drips/runs of Weld-on. > > It is a bluish green liquid and comes in a gal. bottle. > > Dean 40449 > >* >* > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2006
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Before closing up the top of the TailconeBefore closing
up the top of the Tailcone Something I was reminded recently of was the issue of serviceability. There is a lot of space behind the baggage bulkhead, and potentially room for things like Oxygen, air Conditioning, AHRS, Strobe power supply, ELT, Elevator servo, Batteries, contactors, etc. etc. With the tailcone disconnected, and with the top fuse skin at the rear of the cabin off, it's easy to get to these areas, but how will that be accomplished when everything is riveted/bolted up, just a thought to throw into the mix, its caused me to think seriously about adding a hinged access door/panel that would be located behind the baggage bulkhead top skin and forward of the tailcone top skin. Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ John Jessen wrote: > So, is there a reason to locate where Russ has done, or to locate > behind the F-1007, further away from the battery? I'm trying to keep > the area above the battery free for a future hat shelf, but don't want > to place things too far aft if there is a reason one should keep the > AHRS and magnetometer closer to, say, the mid of the plane. If either > is back further into the tailcone, could that mess up their readings? > > John Jessen > 40328 (closing the tailcone as soon as I locate the shelf for the > AHRS/magnetometer) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of > *Russell Daves > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:55 AM > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* Re: RV10-List: Before closing up the top of the > TailconeBefore closing up the top of the Tailcone > > I installed my most forward cross member as close to the F-1006 as > possible, and just behind the bolts joining the F-1046 and F-1032 > Longerons together, almost directly above the battery. I have had > no problems with interference, except where I failed to use brass > bolts and washers to install the magnameter onto the shelf. > > Since the duel AHRS and magnameters are all on a shelf next to > each other in the center of the fuselage the left and right seat > belt cables just cross above the cross members and are no > problem. If you were to install the AHRS or magnameter next to > the fuselage side wall they could cause interference. > > Best regards, > > Russ Daves > N710RV flying > > >* > >href="http://www.aeroelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com >href="http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com >href="http://www.kitlog.com">www.kitlog.com >href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com >href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > >* > > -- No virus found in this Edition. Release Date: 11/6/2006 > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > 11/6/2006 > >* > > >* > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Ritter" <mritter509(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Slime HS
Date: Nov 07, 2006
Just removed my windshield due to a deep scratch on the inside as a result of a passenger putting their headset on the glare shield - bad idea to put anything on the glare shield that will scratch the windshield. Tried using Scratch Off using fingers to rub the compound as the space was to tight for a buffer. Bad idea as I managed to create an ugly distortion. The old window is out and the new one is trimmed to fit and ready to glue in. As posted earlier I coated all the plexiglas with Spray Lat (Aircraft Spruce) before trimming and installation. Worked great. Mark (N410MR - Was flying) >From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV10-List: Slime HS >Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 10:10:20 -0700 > > >I'd also like to hear from anyone who's used this or any other 'REMOVABLE' >coating to protect their plexi during the install process. there was a >thread posted recently about a builder that had developed optical 'waves' >after removing some scratched incurred during the install. I'm nearing this >step/s and have a selfish interest. > >Deems Davis # 406 >Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) >http://deemsrv10.com/ > >ddddsp1(at)juno.com wrote: > >>Anyone ever used SLIME HS from Sherwin-Williams to protect your windows >>when painting your plane? You spray it on and it dries to a protective >>film.............then wash it off when done painting. Was wondering if it >>would provide protection when glueing the window in also..........protect >>against accidental drips/runs of Weld-on. >> >>It is a bluish green liquid and comes in a gal. bottle. >> >>Dean 40449 >> >>* >>* >> > > _________________________________________________________________ Live Search! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rene Felker" <rene(at)felker.com>
Subject: Before closing up the top of the TailconeBefore closing
up the top of the Tailcone
Date: Nov 07, 2006
I put my self at the rear of the first bay, but it will be bolted in place. It will not be the simplest thing to remove, but it will be removable so I can do work on items on the shelf. Just started work on my O2 system. Got all the opinions I needed from the ME's here at work and will be mounting the tank on the back of the baggage area panel. A couple of doublers and I should be set. Question, how many ME's does it take to change a light bulb.... 0, they just call the double E to do it..... Rene' Felker 40322 Finish................. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:21 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Before closing up the top of the TailconeBefore closing up the top of the Tailcone Something I was reminded recently of was the issue of serviceability. There is a lot of space behind the baggage bulkhead, and potentially room for things like Oxygen, air Conditioning, AHRS, Strobe power supply, ELT, Elevator servo, Batteries, contactors, etc. etc. With the tailcone disconnected, and with the top fuse skin at the rear of the cabin off, it's easy to get to these areas, but how will that be accomplished when everything is riveted/bolted up, just a thought to throw into the mix, its caused me to think seriously about adding a hinged access door/panel that would be located behind the baggage bulkhead top skin and forward of the tailcone top skin. Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ John Jessen wrote: > So, is there a reason to locate where Russ has done, or to locate > behind the F-1007, further away from the battery? I'm trying to keep > the area above the battery free for a future hat shelf, but don't want > to place things too far aft if there is a reason one should keep the > AHRS and magnetometer closer to, say, the mid of the plane. If either > is back further into the tailcone, could that mess up their readings? > > John Jessen > 40328 (closing the tailcone as soon as I locate the shelf for the > AHRS/magnetometer) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of > *Russell Daves > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:55 AM > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* Re: RV10-List: Before closing up the top of the > TailconeBefore closing up the top of the Tailcone > > I installed my most forward cross member as close to the F-1006 as > possible, and just behind the bolts joining the F-1046 and F-1032 > Longerons together, almost directly above the battery. I have had > no problems with interference, except where I failed to use brass > bolts and washers to install the magnameter onto the shelf. > > Since the duel AHRS and magnameters are all on a shelf next to > each other in the center of the fuselage the left and right seat > belt cables just cross above the cross members and are no > problem. If you were to install the AHRS or magnameter next to > the fuselage side wall they could cause interference. > > Best regards, > > Russ Daves > N710RV flying > > >* > >href="http://www.aeroelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com >href="http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com >href="http://www.kitlog.com">www.kitlog.com >href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com >href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.co m/Navigator?RV10-List > >* > > -- No virus found in this Edition. Release Date: 11/6/2006 > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > 11/6/2006 > >* > > >* > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GRANSCOTT(at)AOL.COM
Date: Nov 07, 2006
Subject: Re: RV10 vs PA-28-235
Brian I own a 67 235...there's one condition that the 235 beats the pant off of an RV 10...it will haul more weight up in the air...on average 1400lbs...but it's slower for all the items you list...the fat wing is not a true laminar flow wing...under loading it will flex to create more lift loosing it's laminar flow...the cowl is a real speed spoiler along with gear that extends into the sllip stream no matter what pant one uses the tubes are exposed into the slip stream 8-15" above the pant and are uncowled...the plane has many rivets and there is a layer of dome rivets just before the MAC that slows the wing down but allows for more flex and lift. The wing is basically constant cord with a 2% twist further slowing the wing down but increasing lift. but for all it's hairy warts it's a real beast...is faster than a 182 and will fly about as fast as the Cherokee 6 with a 300 hp engine all the while, sipping 4-5 less gallons per hour. The plane does have a nose heavy feel and will Dutch roll given it's way. But given it's 1960's technology, they are still around whether as a 235 or 236 or the expanded versions, Cherokee 6, 6X, Lance or Toga's are still being made. If you can find a copy of Flying, August '68 there's a very good articles one on Laminar flow and the second on the Cherokee 235. Flush riveting and full cowling along with ram airflow will add a lot to tractor engine aircraft...to get even better numbers one needs pusher technology, seamless construction and greater airflow--less resistance...but that potentially may require better piloting techniques/skills over a T-shaped aircraft as well. Patrick N9284W Piper PA 28-235 '67 curises at 130 kts, can fly for 1000 miles and will carry 4 adults with fuel and luggage, hard combination to beat in many GA aircraft. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GRANSCOTT(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 07, 2006
Subject: Re: RV10 vs PA-28-235
Tim on the same note as ground speed I've seen our 235 at over 215kts of ground speed on 22" MP and 2200 rpm (CVG to PHL area 2 plus hours on 22 gallons of gas) but I've also seen 85 kts on 2350 squared in cruise. Had a trip last week where we were 195kts ground speed on 21.5" and 2250 rpm's but on the way up we burned the fuel into the wind to visit the Lycoming factory/tour...visiting ERic Parlow and others at Williamsport. The RV 10's numbers are really very nice numbers but Burt Rutan's designs will beat the 10 in many way's but not in seats per mile...or in ease of construction. I'm looking forward to riding in my buddy Pete's Velosity...but in the time he's spent building the V he could have built 3 RV 10's...but to each there own. P ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GRANSCOTT(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 07, 2006
Subject: RV10 vs PA-28-235
-----------------------------1162922968-- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GRANSCOTT(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 07, 2006
Subject: Re: Turbo Subaru
In a message dated 11/7/2006 10:12:46 AM Eastern Standard Time, bsponcil(at)belinblank.org writes: is instead so terse it's nearly useless. Brian don't you sort of wonder if they glided back down? LOL One hopes there are lots of power option out there for all, though. P ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2006
From: "Kelly McMullen" <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Before closing up the top of the TailconeBefore closing
up the top of the Tailcone Be careful. I would expect the exterior skins in that area to be considered part of the stressed monocoque. Might be better to have access panel as part of the rear baggage compartment panel, as many Cessnas do. On 11/7/06, Deems Davis wrote: > > Something I was reminded recently of was the issue of serviceability. > There is a lot of space behind the baggage bulkhead, and potentially > room for things like Oxygen, air Conditioning, AHRS, Strobe power > supply, ELT, Elevator servo, Batteries, contactors, etc. etc. With the > tailcone disconnected, and with the top fuse skin at the rear of the > cabin off, it's easy to get to these areas, but how will that be > accomplished when everything is riveted/bolted up, just a thought to > throw into the mix, its caused me to think seriously about adding a > hinged access door/panel that would be located behind the baggage > bulkhead top skin and forward of the tailcone top skin. > > Deems Davis # 406 > Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) > http://deemsrv10.com/ > > > John Jessen wrote: > > > So, is there a reason to locate where Russ has done, or to locate > > behind the F-1007, further away from the battery? I'm trying to keep > > the area above the battery free for a future hat shelf, but don't want > > to place things too far aft if there is a reason one should keep the > > AHRS and magnetometer closer to, say, the mid of the plane. If either > > is back further into the tailcone, could that mess up their readings? > > > > John Jessen > > 40328 (closing the tailcone as soon as I locate the shelf for the > > AHRS/magnetometer) > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of > > *Russell Daves > > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:55 AM > > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com > > *Subject:* Re: RV10-List: Before closing up the top of the > > TailconeBefore closing up the top of the Tailcone > > > > I installed my most forward cross member as close to the F-1006 as > > possible, and just behind the bolts joining the F-1046 and F-1032 > > Longerons together, almost directly above the battery. I have had > > no problems with interference, except where I failed to use brass > > bolts and washers to install the magnameter onto the shelf. > > > > Since the duel AHRS and magnameters are all on a shelf next to > > each other in the center of the fuselage the left and right seat > > belt cables just cross above the cross members and are no > > problem. If you were to install the AHRS or magnameter next to > > the fuselage side wall they could cause interference. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Russ Daves > > N710RV flying > > > > > >* > > > >href="http://www.aeroelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com > >href="http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com > >href="http://www.kitlog.com">www.kitlog.com > >href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com > >href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > > > >* > > > > -- No virus found in this Edition. Release Date: 11/6/2006 > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > 11/6/2006 > > > >* > > > > > >* > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2006
From: Les Kearney <kearney(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Slime HS
Mark How difficult was the windshield replacement. When looking at the -10 at Van's, I wondered how difficult replacement would be given that it is 'glassed in (or so it appeared). Inquiring minds need to know... Les Kearney #40643 - Started construction yesterday! -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mark Ritter Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:51 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Slime HS Just removed my windshield due to a deep scratch on the inside as a result of a passenger putting their headset on the glare shield - bad idea to put anything on the glare shield that will scratch the windshield. Tried using Scratch Off using fingers to rub the compound as the space was to tight for a buffer. Bad idea as I managed to create an ugly distortion. The old window is out and the new one is trimmed to fit and ready to glue in. As posted earlier I coated all the plexiglas with Spray Lat (Aircraft Spruce) before trimming and installation. Worked great. Mark (N410MR - Was flying) >From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV10-List: Slime HS >Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 10:10:20 -0700 > > >I'd also like to hear from anyone who's used this or any other 'REMOVABLE' >coating to protect their plexi during the install process. there was a >thread posted recently about a builder that had developed optical 'waves' >after removing some scratched incurred during the install. I'm nearing this >step/s and have a selfish interest. > >Deems Davis # 406 >Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) >http://deemsrv10.com/ > >ddddsp1(at)juno.com wrote: > >>Anyone ever used SLIME HS from Sherwin-Williams to protect your windows >>when painting your plane? You spray it on and it dries to a protective >>film.............then wash it off when done painting. Was wondering if it >>would provide protection when glueing the window in also..........protect >>against accidental drips/runs of Weld-on. >> >>It is a bluish green liquid and comes in a gal. bottle. >> >>Dean 40449 >> >>* >>* >> > > _________________________________________________________________ Live Search! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2006
From: Nikolaos Napoli <owl40188(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Before closing up the top of the TailconeBefore closing
up the top of the Tailcone I second that. I would be very careful putting any access panels in the ou ter skins.=0A =0ANiko=0A40188=0A=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message ----=0AFrom : Kelly McMullen =0ATo: rv10-list(at)matronics.com=0ASent: Tuesday, November 7, 2006 2:02:24 PM=0ASubject: Re: RV10-List: Before closi ng up the top of the TailconeBefore closing up the top of the Tailcone=0A =0A=0ABe careful. I would expect the exterior skins in that area to be=0Aco nsidered part of the stressed monocoque. Might be better to have=0Aaccess p anel as part of the rear baggage compartment panel, as many=0ACessnas do. =0A=0AOn 11/7/06, Deems Davis wrote:=0A> --> RV10-List message posted by: Deems Davis =0A>=0A> Something I wa s reminded recently of was the issue of serviceability.=0A> There is a lot of space behind the baggage bulkhead, and potentially=0A> room for things like Oxygen, air Conditioning, AHRS, Strobe power=0A> supply, ELT, Elevator servo, Batteries, contactors, etc. etc. With the=0A> tailcone disconnected , and with the top fuse skin at the rear of the=0A> cabin off, it's easy to get to these areas, but how will that be=0A> accomplished when everything is riveted/bolted up, just a thought to=0A> throw into the mix, its caused me to think seriously about adding a=0A> hinged access door/panel that wou ld be located behind the baggage=0A> bulkhead top skin and forward of the tailcone top skin.=0A>=0A> Deems Davis # 406=0A> Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! )=0A> http://deemsrv10.com/=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A> John Jessen wrote:=0A>=0A> > S o, is there a reason to locate where Russ has done, or to locate=0A> > behi nd the F-1007, further away from the battery? I'm trying to keep=0A> > the area above the battery free for a future hat shelf, but don't want=0A> > t o place things too far aft if there is a reason one should keep the=0A> > A HRS and magnetometer closer to, say, the mid of the plane. If either=0A> > is back further into the tailcone, could that mess up their readings?=0A> >=0A> > John Jessen=0A> > 40328 (closing the tailcone as soon as I locate the shelf for the=0A> > AHRS/magnetometer)=0A> >=0A> > --------------- ---------------------------------------------------------=0A> > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com=0A> > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-ser ver(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of=0A> > *Russell Daves=0A> > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:55 AM=0A> > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com =0A> > *Subject:* Re: RV10-List: Before closing up the top of the=0A> > TailconeBefore closing up the top of the Tailcone=0A> >=0A> > I in stalled my most forward cross member as close to the F-1006 as=0A> > po ssible, and just behind the bolts joining the F-1046 and F-1032=0A> > L ongerons together, almost directly above the battery. I have had=0A> > no problems with interference, except where I failed to use brass=0A> > bolts and washers to install the magnameter onto the shelf.=0A> >=0A> > Since the duel AHRS and magnameters are all on a shelf next to=0A> > each other in the center of the fuselage the left and right seat=0A> > belt cables just cross above the cross members and are no=0A> > proble m. If you were to install the AHRS or magnameter next to=0A> > the fus elage side wall they could cause interference.=0A> >=0A> > Best regards ,=0A> >=0A> > Russ Daves=0A> > N710RV flying=0A> >=0A> >=0A> >*=0A> >=0A> >href="http://www.aeroelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com>=0A> >hre f="http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com>=0A> >href="http ://www.kitlog.com">www.kitlog.com>=0A> >href="http://www.homebuilthelp.co m">www.homebuilthelp.com>=0A> >href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?R V10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List=0A> >=0A> >*=0A> > =0A> > -- No virus found in this Edition. Release Date: 11/6/2006=0A> > =0A> >=0A> > --=0A> > No virus found in this outgoing message.=0A> > 11/6/2 ======================= ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Cables and heat
Date: Nov 07, 2006
From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder(at)sausen.net>
Sounds like bubkis to me. You are better off keeping the heat in the pipe and getting it out of the cowling. Also, John Forsling has the exact opposite recommendation. That being to have pipes ceramic coated for the reason I mentioned. One big word of caution on using a wrap, the main reason a lot of people don't like it in aircraft is because it happens to be good at holding on to liquids like oil. Not something you want in large quantity in contact with a very hot exhaust and no way to pull over if it ignites. Michael Sausen -10 #352 (2 more weeks to retrieving my project in TX) -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of zackrv8 Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 9:23 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Cables and heat Scooter, Roger that. I talked to Larry on the phone for about 15 minutes on this very subject. He is totally against wrapping the pipes and also against coating the pipes. I can't remember the exact converstaion (it was before LOE 2006), but it has something to do with the pipes being a heat sink on an aircooled engine. Zack ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Slime HS
Date: Nov 07, 2006
From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder(at)sausen.net>
I know Spray Lat has been very popular with various builders. I recall it discussed in the past on the Canard list-serv and I think the RV list here. One important thing is make sure you put enough coats on so you can peel it off easily. If you get it on too thin it's not the most fun stuff in the world to get off. Michael -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 11:10 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Slime HS I'd also like to hear from anyone who's used this or any other 'REMOVABLE' coating to protect their plexi during the install process. there was a thread posted recently about a builder that had developed optical 'waves' after removing some scratched incurred during the install. I'm nearing this step/s and have a selfish interest. Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ ddddsp1(at)juno.com wrote: > Anyone ever used SLIME HS from Sherwin-Williams to protect your > windows when painting your plane? You spray it on and it dries to a > protective film.............then wash it off when done painting. Was > wondering if it would provide protection when glueing the window in > also..........protect against accidental drips/runs of Weld-on. > > It is a bluish green liquid and comes in a gal. bottle. > > Dean 40449 > >* >* > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: FW: [LML] Micromesh competition
Date: Nov 07, 2006
From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com>
>From my archives John C #600 -----Original Message----- From: fmoreno4(at)postoffice.pacbell.net [mailto:fmoreno4(at)postoffice.pacbell.net] Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2000 9:20 AM Subject: [LML] Micromesh competition <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> While at OSH I saw a demo in a 3M booth in which they showed their new plexiglas repair and polish products. Wonderful stuff. Starting with a Bosch (or similar) electrical orbital sander using a foam backed 5 inch disk, they removed a major set of scratches in about 5 minutes. You spray soapy water, sand for a minute with special coarse material, then go finer and finer (one minute each) and then hand rub with their finishing compound. They provide a complete kit on their web site, www.3m.com/finishingsystems They also have an aluminum polishing kit that uses WD-40 as a lubricant, and requires rubbing by hand, but it seems far superior to other buffing systems I have seen. I spoke at length to one of the representatives about using their products for final sanding and buffing of polyurethane paint (including clear coats) on the planes. He had just finished doing his personal Corvette using their products and the orbital sander eliminating a lot of hand labor. He used a thick, soft foam pad to support the sandpaper so he could follow the contours of the body. His recommendation was to sand with "3M Imperial Microfinishing Film" using 9 micron grade equivalent to 1200 US mesh grade (wet sanding), then to to 3 micron, then final buff with their "Finesse" compound. They sell sanding disks with both hook and loop attqchment and sticky attachment. The stickies seem to work fine, even on the flexible foam support pats (whch have a skin of flexible plastic to which the sticky stuff bonds). A note on abrasives. Apparently the old US grading system (100, 400, 600 1200 etc.) is based on using particle sizes that are sifted and thus the abrasive on the sandpaper is actually sized over a range of particle diameters. One can buy 1200 grit sandpaper that could have quite a few individual 600 grit (or larger) particles bonded on the paper. More expensive sand paper has narrow size ranges of particles. The 3M products for plexiglas are actually formed pyramids on the paper (you can see them in rows with a magnifying glass) and they are all the same size so you get very uniform results with no chance of scratching because of stray big particle on the sand paper. I tried it, and it is great stuff. I bought some of their coarser grades as well (100 micron, 60, 30) and I have been using them to flatten my prime coats with excellent results. The sandpaper does not load up, and the orbital sander is the way to go. I use long boards in some areas (I did wings exclusively this way) but for the curves of the fuselage, the results on the primer have been great. Fred Moreno >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye(at)olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Care of Aero Plastics
Date: Nov 07, 2006
From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com>
These two files should already be in your library <> <> John Cox #40600 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Ritter" <mritter509(at)msn.com>
Subject: Slime HS
Date: Nov 07, 2006
Les - We removed the window by cutting (die grinder) around the perimeter of the window. Then using a screw driver pried up the plexiglas that was glued (I used Hysol Glue not Weld 10) to the flanges (sides and top). Took several hours but it eventually came off. A router would also work. Sanded the flanges to get remaining glue off. The fiberglass on the fuselage popped off very easily. Don't know how difficult the job would have been if I had used Weld 10. If you use Spray Lat to protect the windows in addition to putting it on thick don't leave it on for more than a year. Mark (N410MR - Almost flying again) >From: Les Kearney <kearney(at)shaw.ca> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RE: RV10-List: Slime HS >Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 12:16:28 -0700 > > >Mark > >How difficult was the windshield replacement. When looking at the -10 at >Van's, I wondered how difficult replacement would be given that it is >'glassed in (or so it appeared). > >Inquiring minds need to know... > >Les Kearney >#40643 - Started construction yesterday! > > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mark Ritter >Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:51 AM >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV10-List: Slime HS > > >Just removed my windshield due to a deep scratch on the inside as a result >of a passenger putting their headset on the glare shield - bad idea to put >anything on the glare shield that will scratch the windshield. Tried using >Scratch Off using fingers to rub the compound as the space was to tight for >a buffer. Bad idea as I managed to create an ugly distortion. The old >window is out and the new one is trimmed to fit and ready to glue in. > >As posted earlier I coated all the plexiglas with Spray Lat (Aircraft >Spruce) before trimming and installation. Worked great. > >Mark (N410MR - Was flying) > > > >From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net> > >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > >Subject: Re: RV10-List: Slime HS > >Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 10:10:20 -0700 > > > > > >I'd also like to hear from anyone who's used this or any other >'REMOVABLE' > >coating to protect their plexi during the install process. there was a > >thread posted recently about a builder that had developed optical 'waves' > >after removing some scratched incurred during the install. I'm nearing >this > > >step/s and have a selfish interest. > > > >Deems Davis # 406 > >Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) > >http://deemsrv10.com/ > > > >ddddsp1(at)juno.com wrote: > > > >>Anyone ever used SLIME HS from Sherwin-Williams to protect your windows > >>when painting your plane? You spray it on and it dries to a protective > >>film.............then wash it off when done painting. Was wondering if >it > > >>would provide protection when glueing the window in >also..........protect > >>against accidental drips/runs of Weld-on. > >> > >>It is a bluish green liquid and comes in a gal. bottle. > >> > >>Dean 40449 > >> > >>* > >>* > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >_________________________________________________________________ >Live Search! > > _________________________________________________________________ Live Search! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2006
From: Les Kearney <kearney(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM
Hi All A few weeks ago I asked about priming. After a lot of thought, I decided against most of the products currently in use primarily because I didn't want to use really noxious chemicals in an attached garage. As well, volatile hydrocarbons may have been interesting to use in the presence of a natgas garage heater. The product I decided to use is Sherwin Williams DTM (direct to metal) primer. It is water based and not as chemically interesting as other products. Today was day 2 of construction and my first experience with priming. I found the DTM easy to use with a standard air sprayer. Odor wise, it wasn't all that bad although I did use a cartridge air mask just to be safe as it was too cold to do this outside. It takes only a couple of hours to dry and seems to be reasonably scratch resistant. Can any of the primer experts on the list provide guidance as to how thick primer should be applied? Looking at the results of my work, it is apparent that I wasn't consistent in the application. Some parts seemed to have a much heaver coat than others. On some parts the primer is translucent while on others it covers completely. My feeling is that I should go lighter rather than heavier but am not sure. Comments? Suggestions? Inquiring minds need to know . Les Kearney #40643 - Day 2 of long journey ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2006
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Before closing up the top of the TailconeBefore closing
up the top of the Tailcone Good point Kelly !, thanks for keeping this Dreamer grounded in a safer reality. Could it be accomplished by installing sufficient doublers around the opening? And rather than making it hinged, using closely spaced nutplates to attach the access? Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ Kelly McMullen wrote: > > Be careful. I would expect the exterior skins in that area to be > considered part of the stressed monocoque. Might be better to have > access panel as part of the rear baggage compartment panel, as many > Cessnas do. > > On 11/7/06, Deems Davis wrote: > >> >> Something I was reminded recently of was the issue of serviceability. >> There is a lot of space behind the baggage bulkhead, and potentially >> room for things like Oxygen, air Conditioning, AHRS, Strobe power >> supply, ELT, Elevator servo, Batteries, contactors, etc. etc. With the >> tailcone disconnected, and with the top fuse skin at the rear of the >> cabin off, it's easy to get to these areas, but how will that be >> accomplished when everything is riveted/bolted up, just a thought to >> throw into the mix, its caused me to think seriously about adding a >> hinged access door/panel that would be located behind the baggage >> bulkhead top skin and forward of the tailcone top skin. >> >> Deems Davis # 406 >> Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) >> http://deemsrv10.com/ >> >> >> >> John Jessen wrote: >> >> > So, is there a reason to locate where Russ has done, or to locate >> > behind the F-1007, further away from the battery? I'm trying to keep >> > the area above the battery free for a future hat shelf, but don't want >> > to place things too far aft if there is a reason one should keep the >> > AHRS and magnetometer closer to, say, the mid of the plane. If either >> > is back further into the tailcone, could that mess up their readings? >> > >> > John Jessen >> > 40328 (closing the tailcone as soon as I locate the shelf for the >> > AHRS/magnetometer) >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >> > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of >> > *Russell Daves >> > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:55 AM >> > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com >> > *Subject:* Re: RV10-List: Before closing up the top of the >> > TailconeBefore closing up the top of the Tailcone >> > >> > I installed my most forward cross member as close to the F-1006 as >> > possible, and just behind the bolts joining the F-1046 and F-1032 >> > Longerons together, almost directly above the battery. I have had >> > no problems with interference, except where I failed to use brass >> > bolts and washers to install the magnameter onto the shelf. >> > >> > Since the duel AHRS and magnameters are all on a shelf next to >> > each other in the center of the fuselage the left and right seat >> > belt cables just cross above the cross members and are no >> > problem. If you were to install the AHRS or magnameter next to >> > the fuselage side wall they could cause interference. >> > >> > Best regards, >> > >> > Russ Daves >> > N710RV flying >> > >> > >> >* >> > >> >href="http://www.aeroelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com >> >href="http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com >> >href="http://www.kitlog.com">www.kitlog.com >> >href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com >> >href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> >> > >> >* >> > >> > -- No virus found in this Edition. Release Date: 11/6/2006 >> > >> > >> > -- >> > No virus found in this outgoing message. >> > 11/6/2006 >> > >> >* >> > >> > >> >* >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ddddsp1(at)juno.com" <ddddsp1(at)juno.com>
Date: Nov 08, 2006
Subject: Slime HS
I wanted to use Spray Lat but it is NO LONGER available. DEAN 40440 ________________________________________________________________________

I wanted to use Spray Lat but it is NO LONGER available.

 

DEAN 40440



______________________ __________________________________________________
Visit http://www.juno.com/value to sign up today!

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM
Date: Nov 07, 2006
From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com>
The most tragic conclusion is finding that a specific selection of primer is not compatible for long term adhesion of the Top Coat selected later. The decisions need to go hand in hand. Choose Wisely. John Cox #600 ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Les Kearney Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 4:45 PM Subject: RV10-List: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM Hi All A few weeks ago I asked about priming. After a lot of thought, I decided against most of the products currently in use primarily because I didn't want to use really noxious chemicals in an attached garage. As well, volatile hydrocarbons may have been interesting to use in the presence of a natgas garage heater. The product I decided to use is Sherwin Williams DTM (direct to metal) primer. It is water based and not as chemically interesting as other products. Today was day 2 of construction and my first experience with priming. I found the DTM easy to use with a standard air sprayer. Odor wise, it wasn't all that bad although I did use a cartridge air mask just to be safe as it was too cold to do this outside. It takes only a couple of hours to dry and seems to be reasonably scratch resistant. Can any of the primer experts on the list provide guidance as to how thick primer should be applied? Looking at the results of my work, it is apparent that I wasn't consistent in the application. Some parts seemed to have a much heaver coat than others. On some parts the primer is translucent while on others it covers completely. My feeling is that I should go lighter rather than heavier but am not sure. Comments? Suggestions? Inquiring minds need to know ... Les Kearney #40643 - Day 2 of long journey ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Slime HS
Date: Nov 07, 2006
From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder(at)sausen.net>
Here's a couple places: http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/mepages/spraylat.php http://www.wicksaircraft.com/catalog/product_cat.php/subid=2235/index.h t ml Not sure who you checked with but try AS or Wicks. Michael ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of ddddsp1(at)juno.com Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 7:44 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Slime HS I wanted to use Spray Lat but it is NO LONGER available. DEAN 40440 ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chris" <toaster73(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Before closing up the top of the TailconeBefore closing
up the top of the Tailcone
Date: Nov 07, 2006
I'd consider the ability to keep it water tight as well. One other way of thinking about these considerations is just to not bother planning ahead. Just finish the airframe and then install the various pieces of gear. then you will be sure that it can be serviced later and you will have figured out the best way to contort yourself to get at it for the future maintenance. -Chris Lucas #40072 (cabin side skins) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Deems Davis" <deemsdavis(at)cox.net> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 8:22 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Before closing up the top of the TailconeBefore closing up the top of the Tailcone > > Good point Kelly !, thanks for keeping this Dreamer grounded in a safer > reality. Could it be accomplished by installing sufficient doublers around > the opening? And rather than making it hinged, using closely spaced > nutplates to attach the access? > > Deems Davis # 406 > Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) > http://deemsrv10.com/ > > Kelly McMullen wrote: > >> >> Be careful. I would expect the exterior skins in that area to be >> considered part of the stressed monocoque. Might be better to have >> access panel as part of the rear baggage compartment panel, as many >> Cessnas do. >> >> On 11/7/06, Deems Davis wrote: >> >>> >>> Something I was reminded recently of was the issue of serviceability. >>> There is a lot of space behind the baggage bulkhead, and potentially >>> room for things like Oxygen, air Conditioning, AHRS, Strobe power >>> supply, ELT, Elevator servo, Batteries, contactors, etc. etc. With the >>> tailcone disconnected, and with the top fuse skin at the rear of the >>> cabin off, it's easy to get to these areas, but how will that be >>> accomplished when everything is riveted/bolted up, just a thought to >>> throw into the mix, its caused me to think seriously about adding a >>> hinged access door/panel that would be located behind the baggage >>> bulkhead top skin and forward of the tailcone top skin. >>> >>> Deems Davis # 406 >>> Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) >>> http://deemsrv10.com/ >>> >>> >>> >>> John Jessen wrote: >>> >>> > So, is there a reason to locate where Russ has done, or to locate >>> > behind the F-1007, further away from the battery? I'm trying to keep >>> > the area above the battery free for a future hat shelf, but don't want >>> > to place things too far aft if there is a reason one should keep the >>> > AHRS and magnetometer closer to, say, the mid of the plane. If either >>> > is back further into the tailcone, could that mess up their readings? >>> > >>> > John Jessen >>> > 40328 (closing the tailcone as soon as I locate the shelf for the >>> > AHRS/magnetometer) >>> > >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >>> > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of >>> > *Russell Daves >>> > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:55 AM >>> > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com >>> > *Subject:* Re: RV10-List: Before closing up the top of the >>> > TailconeBefore closing up the top of the Tailcone >>> > >>> > I installed my most forward cross member as close to the F-1006 as >>> > possible, and just behind the bolts joining the F-1046 and F-1032 >>> > Longerons together, almost directly above the battery. I have had >>> > no problems with interference, except where I failed to use brass >>> > bolts and washers to install the magnameter onto the shelf. >>> > >>> > Since the duel AHRS and magnameters are all on a shelf next to >>> > each other in the center of the fuselage the left and right seat >>> > belt cables just cross above the cross members and are no >>> > problem. If you were to install the AHRS or magnameter next to >>> > the fuselage side wall they could cause interference. >>> > >>> > Best regards, >>> > >>> > Russ Daves >>> > N710RV flying >>> > >>> > >>> >* >>> > >>> >href="http://www.aeroelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com >>> >href="http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com >>> >href="http://www.kitlog.com">www.kitlog.com >>> >href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com >>> >href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >>> >>> > >>> >* >>> > >>> > -- No virus found in this Edition. Release Date: 11/6/2006 >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > No virus found in this outgoing message. >>> > 11/6/2006 >>> > >>> >* >>> > >>> > >>> >* >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2006
From: "Kelly McMullen" <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Before closing up the top of the TailconeBefore closing
up the top of the Tailcone Perhaps, but do you want to be the designer? I don't know how critical those areas are. I know you can safely go through the back panel of the baggage compartment..maybe not as convenient, but a lot less risky to the structure when you need to do a high G pull out. On 11/7/06, Deems Davis wrote: > > Good point Kelly !, thanks for keeping this Dreamer grounded in a safer > reality. Could it be accomplished by installing sufficient doublers > around the opening? And rather than making it hinged, using closely > spaced nutplates to attach the access? > > Deems Davis # 406 > Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) > http://deemsrv10.com/ > > Kelly McMullen wrote: > > > > > Be careful. I would expect the exterior skins in that area to be > > considered part of the stressed monocoque. Might be better to have > > access panel as part of the rear baggage compartment panel, as many > > Cessnas do. > > > > On 11/7/06, Deems Davis wrote: > > > >> > >> Something I was reminded recently of was the issue of serviceability. > >> There is a lot of space behind the baggage bulkhead, and potentially > >> room for things like Oxygen, air Conditioning, AHRS, Strobe power > >> supply, ELT, Elevator servo, Batteries, contactors, etc. etc. With the > >> tailcone disconnected, and with the top fuse skin at the rear of the > >> cabin off, it's easy to get to these areas, but how will that be > >> accomplished when everything is riveted/bolted up, just a thought to > >> throw into the mix, its caused me to think seriously about adding a > >> hinged access door/panel that would be located behind the baggage > >> bulkhead top skin and forward of the tailcone top skin. > >> > >> Deems Davis # 406 > >> Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) > >> http://deemsrv10.com/ > >> > >> > >> > >> John Jessen wrote: > >> > >> > So, is there a reason to locate where Russ has done, or to locate > >> > behind the F-1007, further away from the battery? I'm trying to keep > >> > the area above the battery free for a future hat shelf, but don't want > >> > to place things too far aft if there is a reason one should keep the > >> > AHRS and magnetometer closer to, say, the mid of the plane. If either > >> > is back further into the tailcone, could that mess up their readings? > >> > > >> > John Jessen > >> > 40328 (closing the tailcone as soon as I locate the shelf for the > >> > AHRS/magnetometer) > >> > > >> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > >> > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of > >> > *Russell Daves > >> > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:55 AM > >> > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com > >> > *Subject:* Re: RV10-List: Before closing up the top of the > >> > TailconeBefore closing up the top of the Tailcone > >> > > >> > I installed my most forward cross member as close to the F-1006 as > >> > possible, and just behind the bolts joining the F-1046 and F-1032 > >> > Longerons together, almost directly above the battery. I have had > >> > no problems with interference, except where I failed to use brass > >> > bolts and washers to install the magnameter onto the shelf. > >> > > >> > Since the duel AHRS and magnameters are all on a shelf next to > >> > each other in the center of the fuselage the left and right seat > >> > belt cables just cross above the cross members and are no > >> > problem. If you were to install the AHRS or magnameter next to > >> > the fuselage side wall they could cause interference. > >> > > >> > Best regards, > >> > > >> > Russ Daves > >> > N710RV flying > >> > > >> > > >> >* > >> > > >> >href="http://www.aeroelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com > >> >href="http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com > >> >href="http://www.kitlog.com">www.kitlog.com > >> >href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com > >> >href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > >> > >> > > >> >* > >> > > >> > -- No virus found in this Edition. Release Date: 11/6/2006 > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > No virus found in this outgoing message. > >> > 11/6/2006 > >> > > >> >* > >> > > >> > > >> >* > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2006
From: Rick <ricksked(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Before closing up the top of the TailconeBefore closing
up the top of the Tailcone Actually water tight is easy...the USAF way. Apply a light coat of proseal the the face of the joggle but not too close to the holes and not the panel. Place a sheet of the "good" plastic wrap like 1 or 2 mil visqueen tightly over the opening, no wrinkles, on top of the proseal AFTER using a hole punch to open up the screw holes, (line the holes up too) install the panel with a bit of petro jelly on each screw snug up the screws and let it sit for a day or two. Remove the panel and using a sharp razor knfe...X-acto works good trim the opening, a single edge razor blade works gfood to get the ozzed bead off the edge of the joggle outside of the skin. I've use this technique to reseal more access panels on the F-16 than I can think about. Rick S. 40185 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 08, 2006
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: If You Got This Email, You Haven't Made A Contribution Yet!
:-) If you received this particular Matronics List Email message, its because you haven't yet made a Contribution to support your Lists! This is the first PBS-like funds drive message under the new distribution system. The new system selectively sends out the Contribution messages ONLY to those that forgot to whip out the 'ol credit card this year to support the continued operation and upgrade of the Matronics Email Lists! Don't you wish PBS worked that way? :-) You heard that right. Once you make your Contribution, these support requests messages during November will suddenly stop coming to your personal email inbox! Pardon me if I seem kind of excited about the new feature. I've wanted to implement something like this for a number of years now, but it was always such a daunting task to modify the back-end List processing code, that I just kept putting it off. Finally this year, I just decided to bite the bullet and put the code-pounding time it to make it work. A few days later, bam! A working system! Anyway, I'll stop gushing now. I really do appreciate each and every one of your individual Contributions to support the Lists. It is your support that enables me to upgrade the hardware and software that are required to run a List Site like this. It also goes to pay for the Commercial-Grade Internet connection and to pay the rather huge electric bill to keep the computer gear running and the air conditioner powered up. Your personal Contribution matters because when combined with other Listers such as yourself, it pays the bills to keep this site up and running. I accept exactly ZERO advertising dollars for the Matronics Lists sites. I can't stand the pop-up ads and all other commercialism that is so prevalent on the Internet these days and I particularly don't want to have it on my Email List site. I'm pretty sure you don't either. If you appreciate the ad-free, grass-roots, down-home feel of the Matronics Email Lists, please make a Contribution today to keep it that way!! http://www.matronics.com/contribution Thank you! Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net>
Subject: Windshield replacement question
Date: Nov 08, 2006
One of the guys who hangars where I'm building had a bird hit his RV7 windshield and broke it. They told me they took a torch and heated up the area where it was bonded an it came right out with no problem. They took it out and had a new one in within a couple of hours. Wayne Edgerton #40336 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net>
Subject: Re: Cables and heatCables and heat
Date: Nov 08, 2006
I was talking to George OrnDorff about wrapping the pipes after reading it on Matronics and he told me that Larry Vetterman had told him that they shouldn't be wrapped. Something to do with moisture, can't remember the reason for sure. Wayne Edgerton #40336 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Perry Casson" <pcasson(at)sasktel.net>
Subject: flap bushing install
Date: Nov 08, 2006
Hi All, I'm building slow build and due to Canadian inspection rules we have to deviate from the construction sequence in the manual a fair bit. Somewhere along the way I've missed the instructions on installing the bushings into the 1025A flap brackets. We looked through the book for 20 min. last night and did not find it. Could someone please tell me what page it's on. Thanks, Perry Casson Regina, Canada ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 08, 2006
From: James Hein <n8vim(at)arrl.net>
Subject: Re: flap bushing install
Page 22-8 Pic attached. -Jim 40384 Perry Casson wrote: > Hi All, > > > > I'm building slow build and due to Canadian inspection rules we have > to deviate from the construction sequence in the manual a fair bit. > Somewhere along the way I've missed the instructions on installing the > bushings into the 1025A flap brackets. We looked through the book for > 20 min. last night and did not find it. Could someone please tell me > what page it's on. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Perry Casson > > Regina, Canada > >* > > >* > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 08, 2006
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: flap bushing install
Sec 22-8 step 13 figure # 4 Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ Perry Casson wrote: > Hi All, > > Im building slow build and due to Canadian inspection rules we have > to deviate from the construction sequence in the manual a fair bit. > Somewhere along the way Ive missed the instructions on installing the > bushings into the 1025A flap brackets. We looked through the book for > 20 min. last night and did not find it. Could someone please tell me > what page its on. > > Thanks, > > Perry Casson > > Regina, Canada > >* > > >* > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 08, 2006
From: <sam.marlow(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: If You Got This Email, You Haven't Made A Contribution
Yet! :-) YES I DID MAKE A CONTRIBUTION! ---- Matt Dralle wrote: > > If you received this particular Matronics List Email message, its because you haven't yet made a Contribution to support your Lists! This is the first PBS-like funds drive message under the new distribution system. The new system selectively sends out the Contribution messages ONLY to those that forgot to whip out the 'ol credit card this year to support the continued operation and upgrade of the Matronics Email Lists! Don't you wish PBS worked that way? :-) > > You heard that right. Once you make your Contribution, these support requests messages during November will suddenly stop coming to your personal email inbox! Pardon me if I seem kind of excited about the new feature. I've wanted to implement something like this for a number of years now, but it was always such a daunting task to modify the back-end List processing code, that I just kept putting it off. Finally this year, I just decided to bite the bullet and put the code-pounding time it to make it work. A few days later, bam! A working system! > > Anyway, I'll stop gushing now. I really do appreciate each and every one of your individual Contributions to support the Lists. It is your support that enables me to upgrade the hardware and software that are required to run a List Site like this. It also goes to pay for the Commercial-Grade Internet connection and to pay the rather huge electric bill to keep the computer gear running and the air conditioner powered up. > > Your personal Contribution matters because when combined with other Listers such as yourself, it pays the bills to keep this site up and running. I accept exactly ZERO advertising dollars for the Matronics Lists sites. I can't stand the pop-up ads and all other commercialism that is so prevalent on the Internet these days and I particularly don't want to have it on my Email List site. I'm pretty sure you don't either. > > If you appreciate the ad-free, grass-roots, down-home feel of the Matronics Email Lists, please make a Contribution today to keep it that way!! > > http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > Thank you! > > Matt Dralle > Matronics Email List Administrator > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rene Felker" <rene(at)felker.com>
Subject: flap bushing install
Date: Nov 08, 2006
I can not remember where the instructions were, but make sure you have your bottom skins on first before to press them in. Sorry, I do not have my plans here to find the reference. Rene' Felker _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Perry Casson Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 7:45 AM Subject: RV10-List: flap bushing install Hi All, I'm building slow build and due to Canadian inspection rules we have to deviate from the construction sequence in the manual a fair bit. Somewhere along the way I've missed the instructions on installing the bushings into the 1025A flap brackets. We looked through the book for 20 min. last night and did not find it. Could someone please tell me what page it's on. Thanks, Perry Casson Regina, Canada ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: flap bushing install
Date: Nov 08, 2006
From: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR(at)wernerco.com>
It is on page 22-8, Figure 4, bottom Hope this helps Dan 40269 (N289DT) _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Perry Casson Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 9:45 AM Subject: RV10-List: flap bushing install Hi All, I'm building slow build and due to Canadian inspection rules we have to deviate from the construction sequence in the manual a fair bit. Somewhere along the way I've missed the instructions on installing the bushings into the 1025A flap brackets. We looked through the book for 20 min. last night and did not find it. Could someone please tell me what page it's on. Thanks, Perry Casson Regina, Canada ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 08, 2006
From: Bill DeRouchey <billderou(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Before closing up the top of the TailconeBefore closing
up the top of the Tailcone My recommendation is to not button down the top three tail skins until everything else is completed on the entire aircraft. You can start and even perform slow taxi tests with these skins off. If you are going to install a remote magnetometer or AHRS you can swing the compass and relocate the unit as needed. Keep all clecos away from the AHRS as they are iron based. I have constructed a simple shelf aftmost between the main fuselage longeron and the elevator trim servo mechanism. My first AHRS in installed in that location was affected by the trim servo motor (not running). I scrapped this AHRS for other reasons and now tasked to locate the Cross-bow properly. You can not locate the AHRS just behind the baggage bulkhead no matter how high it is installed above the floor. Variable magnetic fields from the baggage will affect your heading information in uncontrollable ways. The Cross-bow has a good hard iron calibration routine so my next approach will be to locate it far aft and calibrate the magnetic interferrence from the trim servo motor out of the heading. With this approach there is only one source of interferrence. My suggestion is to delay installation of the three top skins to the very end. I will report back after I am satisfied with my AHRS installation. Bill DeRouchey billderou(at)yahoo.com N939SB, flying with a few pit stops Chris wrote: I'd consider the ability to keep it water tight as well. One other way of thinking about these considerations is just to not bother planning ahead. Just finish the airframe and then install the various pieces of gear. then you will be sure that it can be serviced later and you will have figured out the best way to contort yourself to get at it for the future maintenance. -Chris Lucas #40072 (cabin side skins) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Deems Davis" Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 8:22 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Before closing up the top of the TailconeBefore closing up the top of the Tailcone > > Good point Kelly !, thanks for keeping this Dreamer grounded in a safer > reality. Could it be accomplished by installing sufficient doublers around > the opening? And rather than making it hinged, using closely spaced > nutplates to attach the access? > > Deems Davis # 406 > Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) > http://deemsrv10.com/ > > Kelly McMullen wrote: > >> >> Be careful. I would expect the exterior skins in that area to be >> considered part of the stressed monocoque. Might be better to have >> access panel as part of the rear baggage compartment panel, as many >> Cessnas do. >> >> On 11/7/06, Deems Davis wrote: >> >>> >>> Something I was reminded recently of was the issue of serviceability. >>> There is a lot of space behind the baggage bulkhead, and potentially >>> room for things like Oxygen, air Conditioning, AHRS, Strobe power >>> supply, ELT, Elevator servo, Batteries, contactors, etc. etc. With the >>> tailcone disconnected, and with the top fuse skin at the rear of the >>> cabin off, it's easy to get to these areas, but how will that be >>> accomplished when everything is riveted/bolted up, just a thought to >>> throw into the mix, its caused me to think seriously about adding a >>> hinged access door/panel that would be located behind the baggage >>> bulkhead top skin and forward of the tailcone top skin. >>> >>> Deems Davis # 406 >>> Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) >>> http://deemsrv10.com/ >>> >>> >>> >>> John Jessen wrote: >>> >>> > So, is there a reason to locate where Russ has done, or to locate >>> > behind the F-1007, further away from the battery? I'm trying to keep >>> > the area above the battery free for a future hat shelf, but don't want >>> > to place things too far aft if there is a reason one should keep the >>> > AHRS and magnetometer closer to, say, the mid of the plane. If either >>> > is back further into the tailcone, could that mess up their readings? >>> > >>> > John Jessen >>> > 40328 (closing the tailcone as soon as I locate the shelf for the >>> > AHRS/magnetometer) >>> > >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >>> > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of >>> > *Russell Daves >>> > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:55 AM >>> > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com >>> > *Subject:* Re: RV10-List: Before closing up the top of the >>> > TailconeBefore closing up the top of the Tailcone >>> > >>> > I installed my most forward cross member as close to the F-1006 as >>> > possible, and just behind the bolts joining the F-1046 and F-1032 >>> > Longerons together, almost directly above the battery. I have had >>> > no problems with interference, except where I failed to use brass >>> > bolts and washers to install the magnameter onto the shelf. >>> > >>> > Since the duel AHRS and magnameters are all on a shelf next to >>> > each other in the center of the fuselage the left and right seat >>> > belt cables just cross above the cross members and are no >>> > problem. If you were to install the AHRS or magnameter next to >>> > the fuselage side wall they could cause interference. >>> > >>> > Best regards, >>> > >>> > Russ Daves >>> > N710RV flying >>> > >>> > >>> >* >>> > >>> >href="http://www.aeroelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com >>> >href="http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com >>> >href="http://www.kitlog.com">www.kitlog.com >>> >href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com >>> >href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >>> >>> > >>> >* >>> > >>> > -- No virus found in this Edition. Release Date: 11/6/2006 >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > No virus found in this outgoing message. >>> > 11/6/2006 >>> > >>> >* >>> > >>> > >>> >* >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Jessen" <jjessen(at)rcn.com>
Subject: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM
Date: Nov 08, 2006
Les, just make sure that the primer you use for the interior of the fuselage, which you might want to paint, is compatible with your paint. The rest of the interior can be whatever you want. It won't be painted. John Jessen #40328 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Les Kearney Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:06 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM Hmmm John, choosing wisely can be difficult if one is in the dark. From all I have been able to read, priming is a very dark art. That being said, my plan is to prime only interior components and to leave the exterior surfaces to the experts. On the other hand, I do know a very good paint shop and perhaps will have a chat with them just to be sure=85. Cheers Les Kearney RV10 # 40643 - Vertical Stab -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John W. Cox Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 7:57 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM The most tragic conclusion is finding that a specific selection of primer is not compatible for long term adhesion of the Top Coat selected later. The decisions need to go hand in hand. Choose Wisely. John Cox #600 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Les Kearney Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 4:45 PM Subject: RV10-List: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM Hi All A few weeks ago I asked about priming. After a lot of thought, I decided against most of the products currently in use primarily because I didn=92t want to use really noxious chemicals in an attached garage. As well, volatile hydrocarbons may have been interesting to use in the presence of a natgas garage heater. The product I decided to use is Sherwin Williams DTM (direct to metal) primer. It is water based and not as chemically interesting as other products. Today was day 2 of construction and my first experience with priming. I found the DTM easy to use with a standard air sprayer. Odor wise, it wasn=92t all that bad although I did use a cartridge air mask just to be safe as it was too cold to do this outside. It takes only a couple of hours to dry and seems to be reasonably scratch resistant. Can any of the primer experts on the list provide guidance as to how thick primer should be applied? Looking at the results of my work, it is apparent that I wasn=92t consistent in the application. Some parts seemed to have a much heaver coat than others. On some parts the primer is translucent while on others it covers completely. My feeling is that I should go lighter rather than heavier but am not sure. Comments? Suggestions? Inquiring minds need to know =85 Les Kearney #40643 ' Day 2 of long journey HYPERLINK "http://www.buildersbooks.com"www.buildersbooks.com HYPERLINK "http://www.kitlog.com"www.kitlog.com HYPERLINK "http://www.homebuilthelp.com"www.homebuilthelp.com HYPERLINK "http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List"http://www.matronics.com/Na vig ator?RV10-List www.aeroelectric.com www.buildersbooks.com www.kitlog.com www.homebuilthelp.com http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List "http://www.aeroelectric.com"www.aeroelectric.com "http://www.buildersbooks.com"www.buildersbooks.com "http://www.kitlog.com"www.kitlog.com "http://www.homebuilthelp.com"www.homebuilthelp.com "http://www.matronics.com/contribution"http://www.matronics.com/contribut ion "http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List"http://www.matronics.com/Na vig ator?RV10-List 11/7/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. 11/7/2006 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 08, 2006
From: Les Kearney <kearney(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM
John Thanks for the heads up. For the moment I am focused on the tail section. I am leaning towards a QB fuse / wings which I believe comes pre-primed. If I do go the with a slow build fuse your point becomes quite relevant. I hadn't (at this point) really thought about painted surfaces in the cockpit area. Cheers Les Kearney RV10 # 40643 - Vertical Stab -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Jessen Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 10:10 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM Les, just make sure that the primer you use for the interior of the fuselage, which you might want to paint, is compatible with your paint. The rest of the interior can be whatever you want. It won't be painted. John Jessen #40328 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Les Kearney Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:06 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM Hmmm John, choosing wisely can be difficult if one is in the dark. From all I have been able to read, priming is a very dark art. That being said, my plan is to prime only interior components and to leave the exterior surfaces to the experts. On the other hand, I do know a very good paint shop and perhaps will have a chat with them just to be sure.. Cheers Les Kearney RV10 # 40643 - Vertical Stab -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John W. Cox Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 7:57 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM The most tragic conclusion is finding that a specific selection of primer is not compatible for long term adhesion of the Top Coat selected later. The decisions need to go hand in hand. Choose Wisely. John Cox #600 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Les Kearney Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 4:45 PM Subject: RV10-List: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM Hi All A few weeks ago I asked about priming. After a lot of thought, I decided against most of the products currently in use primarily because I didn't want to use really noxious chemicals in an attached garage. As well, volatile hydrocarbons may have been interesting to use in the presence of a natgas garage heater. The product I decided to use is Sherwin Williams DTM (direct to metal) primer. It is water based and not as chemically interesting as other products. Today was day 2 of construction and my first experience with priming. I found the DTM easy to use with a standard air sprayer. Odor wise, it wasn't all that bad although I did use a cartridge air mask just to be safe as it was too cold to do this outside. It takes only a couple of hours to dry and seems to be reasonably scratch resistant. Can any of the primer experts on the list provide guidance as to how thick primer should be applied? Looking at the results of my work, it is apparent that I wasn't consistent in the application. Some parts seemed to have a much heaver coat than others. On some parts the primer is translucent while on others it covers completely. My feeling is that I should go lighter rather than heavier but am not sure. Comments? Suggestions? Inquiring minds need to know . Les Kearney #40643 - Day 2 of long journey <http://www.buildersbooks.com> www.buildersbooks.com www.kitlog.com www.homebuilthelp.com <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List www.aeroelectric.com www.buildersbooks.com www.kitlog.com www.homebuilthelp.com http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List href="http://www.aeroelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com href="http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com href="http://www.kitlog.com">www.kitlog.com href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronic s.com /Navigator?RV10-List -- No virus found in this Edition. Release Date: 11/7/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. 11/7/2006 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: LessDragProd(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 08, 2006
Subject: Re: Archives and willingness to comment
I hope your appeal doesn't fall on "deaf ears", as the saying goes. My experience has been that there is always at least one person that insists (demands) the list has to work "within the box" he has created. i.e., no independent thought. This eliminates the possibility of creating synergy on the list. As a result, there can be no creative development on the list. Perhaps it is enough to simply help each other understand the plans and the parts provided; in other to complete the aircraft as designed. NOT! Regards, Jim Ayers Modified HR2 :-) In a message dated 11/08/2006 9:52:12 AM Pacific Standard Time, jsmcgrew(at)aol.com writes: Here's my opinion on this subject: This list was (and is) a valuable resource to getting my RV-10 done. I do my best to send pictures and descriptions of how I did things in hope of helping out others. I have become a bit reluctant to comment as of late. It's frustrating to throw an idea or a question out there only to be met with soap box lectures on building practices. Everyone should feel comfortable sending out a post. Let's keep this a friendly and open sharing of ideas!!! Jim 40134 - Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: New WD-415
From: "johngoodman" <johngoodman(at)earthlink.net>
Date: Nov 08, 2006
Here is a photo of my new WD-415s from RivetHead that just arrived today. They are next to the ones from Van's - not Van's new WD-415-1s. -------- #40572 Empennage - starting Elevators! N711JG reserved Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=73197#73197 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/wd415s_214.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rob Wright" <armywrights(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: flap bushing install
Date: Nov 08, 2006
Having bottom skins on is not mandatory, just in case you're trying to now push them back out. You just have to gently spread the slot around the bushing as you attach the bottom skins. Rob Wright #392 Many safe iterations of bottom skin installs around the bushings. _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rene Felker Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 9:07 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: flap bushing install I can not remember where the instructions were, but make sure you have your bottom skins on first before to press them in. Sorry, I do not have my plans here to find the reference. Rene' Felker _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Perry Casson Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 7:45 AM Subject: RV10-List: flap bushing install Hi All, I'm building slow build and due to Canadian inspection rules we have to deviate from the construction sequence in the manual a fair bit. Somewhere along the way I've missed the instructions on installing the bushings into the 1025A flap brackets. We looked through the book for 20 min. last night and did not find it. Could someone please tell me what page it's on. Thanks, Perry Casson Regina, Canada www.aeroelectric.com www.kitlog.com http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List www.aeroelectric.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "jdalton77" <jdalton77(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: New WD-415
Date: Nov 08, 2006
I installed mine (and the rest of Dave's parts) and they save a lot of time and are of great quality. Well worth it! ----- Original Message ----- From: "johngoodman" <johngoodman(at)earthlink.net> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 5:23 PM Subject: RV10-List: New WD-415 > > Here is a photo of my new WD-415s from RivetHead that just arrived today. > They are next to the ones from Van's - not Van's new WD-415-1s. > > -------- > #40572 Empennage - starting Elevators! > N711JG reserved > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=73197#73197 > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/wd415s_214.jpg > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rob Wright" <armywrights(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM
Date: Nov 08, 2006
Les, The QB wings/fuse don't come primed in the sense you are probably thinking. The bare metal is still visible, although there is some kind of viscous protectant on it, and is presumably sprayed on after assembly to protect it during shipment across the ocean. Some folks have thought of it as some kind of transparent conversion coating a la alodining. Regardless of what the QB assemblers use, I think all of us primer users are priming all the areas we can get to, including removing floor and side access panels just to help out that much more. A little scrub with scotchbrite and spirits makes it ready to prime. Interior surfaces intended for painting will require more prep from even this stage. Rob Wright #392 Tailcone attached tonight! _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Les Kearney Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 12:08 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM John Thanks for the heads up. For the moment I am focused on the tail section. I am leaning towards a QB fuse / wings which I believe comes pre-primed. If I do go the with a slow build fuse your point becomes quite relevant. I hadn't (at this point) really thought about painted surfaces in the cockpit area. Cheers Les Kearney RV10 # 40643 - Vertical Stab -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Jessen Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 10:10 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM Les, just make sure that the primer you use for the interior of the fuselage, which you might want to paint, is compatible with your paint. The rest of the interior can be whatever you want. It won't be painted. John Jessen #40328 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Les Kearney Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:06 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM Hmmm John, choosing wisely can be difficult if one is in the dark. From all I have been able to read, priming is a very dark art. That being said, my plan is to prime only interior components and to leave the exterior surfaces to the experts. On the other hand, I do know a very good paint shop and perhaps will have a chat with them just to be sure.. Cheers Les Kearney RV10 # 40643 - Vertical Stab -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John W. Cox Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 7:57 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM The most tragic conclusion is finding that a specific selection of primer is not compatible for long term adhesion of the Top Coat selected later. The decisions need to go hand in hand. Choose Wisely. John Cox #600 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Les Kearney Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 4:45 PM Subject: RV10-List: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM Hi All A few weeks ago I asked about priming. After a lot of thought, I decided against most of the products currently in use primarily because I didn't want to use really noxious chemicals in an attached garage. As well, volatile hydrocarbons may have been interesting to use in the presence of a natgas garage heater. The product I decided to use is Sherwin Williams DTM (direct to metal) primer. It is water based and not as chemically interesting as other products. Today was day 2 of construction and my first experience with priming. I found the DTM easy to use with a standard air sprayer. Odor wise, it wasn't all that bad although I did use a cartridge air mask just to be safe as it was too cold to do this outside. It takes only a couple of hours to dry and seems to be reasonably scratch resistant. Can any of the primer experts on the list provide guidance as to how thick primer should be applied? Looking at the results of my work, it is apparent that I wasn't consistent in the application. Some parts seemed to have a much heaver coat than others. On some parts the primer is translucent while on others it covers completely. My feeling is that I should go lighter rather than heavier but am not sure. Comments? Suggestions? Inquiring minds need to know . Les Kearney #40643 - Day 2 of long journey <http://www.buildersbooks.com> www.buildersbooks.com www.kitlog.com www.homebuilthelp.com <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List www.aeroelectric.com www.buildersbooks.com www.kitlog.com www.homebuilthelp.com http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List href="http://www.aeroelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com href="http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com href="http://www.kitlog.com">www.kitlog.com href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com /Navigator?RV10-List -- No virus found in this Edition. Release Date: 11/7/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. 11/7/2006 <http://www.buildersbooks.com> www.buildersbooks.com www.kitlog.com www.homebuilthelp.com <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chris , Susie Darcy" <VHMUM(at)bigpond.com>
Subject: Gear leg thread
Date: Nov 09, 2006
Would anyone know what thread is on the gear leg?? Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 08, 2006
From: Perry Casson <pcasson(at)sasktel.net>
Subject: flap bushing install
Thanks for your help guys - My page 22-8 was rev 0 which does not have any mention of installing bushing or have a figure 4. Talked to Vans and saw the updated page James Hein sent and even found bushings. All is good. Perry Casson Regina, Canada ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 08, 2006
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Clarification On New Contribution Module Operation...
Dear Listers, A number of Listers emailed and indicated that, even though they had made a Contribution this year, they still received the Contribution message yesterday. I looked into it and I found a slight anomaly (ok, bug) in the new code specifically as it related to Listers that had made their Contribution through PayPal AND have a DIFFERENT email address for their PayPal account and for their Matronics List subscription. If your PayPal account email address is DIFFERENT than the email address you are subscribed to the Matronics List(s) as, then my new code module couldn't tell that you had made a Contribution, since it was using the PayPal email address instead of the List email. I've fixed this issue for any new PayPal Contributions, but I don't have any easy way of resolving this for any of the previous Contribtuions. Again, this is ONLY an issue if your PayPal and Matronics List email addresses ARE NOT the same. Otherwise, everything works great. If you made a PayPal Contribution before 11/09/06 AND your email addresses don't match, please drop me an email at " info(at)matronics.com " (do not reply to this message!) and give me your Name, and both Email Addresses and I will manually update the records so that things will work as advertised. Sorry for the hassle! New code; new bugs... :-) To make a Contribution, please see: http://www.matronics.com/contribution Thank you! Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administration ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Dunne" <acs(at)acspropeller.com.au>
Subject: Re: Gear leg thread
Date: Nov 09, 2006
Chris it looks like BSW 3/8" 16 John 40315 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 09, 2006
From: Link McGarity <wv4i(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: aileron throw
Sorry, but I have to chime in with John C. on this one. You should NEVER have restricted control movement by design. While it is true that the control stick box, rudder travel for that matter, is/are normally rather confined, especially at higher airpspeeds, there ARE situations, and in other than aerobatic flight, where full control movement may be required. I encourage anyone considering restricted control movement, by design, to give this latter point serious consideration. Example, and on the lighter side, a wake turbulence encounter.... A neighbor, the other day, reported substantial wake turbulence and control recovery effort after being "thumped" by an F-15 whilst on final to our airport. What TFR? What presidential visit in progress some 12-15nm away, hi? Intercept procedures and required response, huh? Anyway, point is to always consider the unexpected, and in this case the need for full control authority, always. Link McGarity #40622 elevators RV6/N42GF/flying, non builder ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Sipp" <rsipp(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Fuel Injection 101
Date: Nov 09, 2006
This past weekend I attended Airflow Performances' course; Fuel Injection 101. I am finishing up the installation of their fuel injection system and so the timing was right. The class covers fuel injection theory and practical application. It was particularly interesting to see the components actually functioning on a flow bench. Valuable information on the best ways to install supply lines, controls and sensors was also covered. An interesting session on fuel air ratio control and injector balancing completed the program. Don & Colleen Rivera were outstanding hosts and the class students enjoyed their hospitality. Highly recommended for anyone operating or considering any RSA type fuel injection system. http://www.airflowperformance.com/ Dick Sipp 40065 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 09, 2006
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Turbo 10
Patrick, I noticed that you builder # is listed as 40822. Normally that would imply Van's has sold at least 822 RV-10 kits. The highest number that I had seen to date was in the mid to upper 600's. Is there a special Van's numbering system for OZ? Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ Patrick Pulis wrote: > Gentlemen, the turbo 10 lives at Goolwa in South Australia and has > been modified by Jon Johansen, who has flow his RV-4 twice around the > world and once to Antarctica. As I understand it, the leading edges > have also been converted to a full span fuel tank, as have the tips. > Jon's RV has a completely wet wing, which has enabled it to have > endurance in excess of 16 hours. Jon also recently ferried an RV-8 > across the Pacific from the US. What I am trying to say here guys is > that there is an incredible amount of RV experience in this project. > > Regards > > Patrick > Adelaide, South Australia > RV-10 S/No. 40822 > >* >* > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Brian Douglas" <bsponcil(at)belinblank.org>
Subject: Re: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM
Date: Nov 09, 2006
Where'd you get the SW DTM primer? I've been looking for something a little less caustic, particularly since winter is looming over the midwest and my garage door will have to be mostly closed from now until March. I'm no expert but I think if you can't see underneath the primer, it's probably too thick. Unless you're planning to paint over it, you're goal is to put down an extra layer of corrosion protection. Ideally you want to achieve that aim with the minimum amount weight gain so the thinner the better - at least for parts that'll likely never be touched again. -Brian #40497 Iowa City, IA ------ Original Message ----- From: Les Kearney To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 6:45 PM Subject: RV10-List: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM Hi All A few weeks ago I asked about priming. After a lot of thought, I decided against most of the products currently in use primarily because I didn't want to use really noxious chemicals in an attached garage. As well, volatile hydrocarbons may have been interesting to use in the presence of a natgas garage heater. The product I decided to use is Sherwin Williams DTM (direct to metal) primer. It is water based and not as chemically interesting as other products. Today was day 2 of construction and my first experience with priming. I found the DTM easy to use with a standard air sprayer. Odor wise, it wasn't all that bad although I did use a cartridge air mask just to be safe as it was too cold to do this outside. It takes only a couple of hours to dry and seems to be reasonably scratch resistant. Can any of the primer experts on the list provide guidance as to how thick primer should be applied? Looking at the results of my work, it is apparent that I wasn't consistent in the application. Some parts seemed to have a much heaver coat than others. On some parts the primer is translucent while on others it covers completely. My feeling is that I should go lighter rather than heavier but am not sure. Comments? Suggestions? Inquiring minds need to know . Les Kearney #40643 - Day 2 of long journey ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 09, 2006
From: Nikolaos Napoli <owl40188(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Rudder Pedal Bolt Direction
Has everyone been reversing the rudder pedal bolt directions from those sho wn in the plans per what Randy had to do. I tried this and didn't like the results as the nut touches the steel tube pedal frame as it rotates. Addi tionally its difficult to put the cotter pin on as there isn't much room. I am thinking of leaving it per the plans and checking the cotter pins in t he preflight. Any suggestions / comments.=0A =0ANiko=0A40188 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 09, 2006
From: Les Kearney <kearney(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM
Brian I think you are right about the thickness. I have only done a few parts so far (the vertical stab skeleton) so it is not really an issue - just a lesson learned. I plan to just "mist" parts from now on so that I just have a thin primer film. I bought the paint from a Sherwin Williams outlet store. It is called SW DTM and can be found on their website at : http://makeashorterlink.com/?C1864622E Cheers Les Kearney #40643 - Day 3 of long journey -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Brian Douglas Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 8:38 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM Where'd you get the SW DTM primer? I've been looking for something a little less caustic, particularly since winter is looming over the midwest and my garage door will have to be mostly closed from now until March. I'm no expert but I think if you can't see underneath the primer, it's probably too thick. Unless you're planning to paint over it, you're goal is to put down an extra layer of corrosion protection. Ideally you want to achieve that aim with the minimum amount weight gain so the thinner the better - at least for parts that'll likely never be touched again. -Brian #40497 Iowa City, IA ------ Original Message ----- From: Les Kearney <mailto:kearney(at)shaw.ca> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 6:45 PM Subject: RV10-List: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM Hi All A few weeks ago I asked about priming. After a lot of thought, I decided against most of the products currently in use primarily because I didn't want to use really noxious chemicals in an attached garage. As well, volatile hydrocarbons may have been interesting to use in the presence of a natgas garage heater. The product I decided to use is Sherwin Williams DTM (direct to metal) primer. It is water based and not as chemically interesting as other products. Today was day 2 of construction and my first experience with priming. I found the DTM easy to use with a standard air sprayer. Odor wise, it wasn't all that bad although I did use a cartridge air mask just to be safe as it was too cold to do this outside. It takes only a couple of hours to dry and seems to be reasonably scratch resistant. Can any of the primer experts on the list provide guidance as to how thick primer should be applied? Looking at the results of my work, it is apparent that I wasn't consistent in the application. Some parts seemed to have a much heaver coat than others. On some parts the primer is translucent while on others it covers completely. My feeling is that I should go lighter rather than heavier but am not sure. Comments? Suggestions? Inquiring minds need to know . Les Kearney #40643 - Day 2 of long journey href="http://www.aeroelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com href="http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com href="http://www.kitlog.com">www.kitlog.com href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronic s.com /Navigator?RV10-List ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rene Felker" <rene(at)felker.com>
Subject: Rudder Pedal Bolt Direction
Date: Nov 09, 2006
I liked the idea of doing it as in the plans and just putting heat shrink over the nut and cotter pin so that it can not catch on the shoe. But I have not gotten to that type of finish work yet, it is on my very longggggggggg to do list. Rene' Felker 40322 Finish kit and more.. _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Nikolaos Napoli Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 8:55 AM Subject: RV10-List: Rudder Pedal Bolt Direction Has everyone been reversing the rudder pedal bolt directions from those shown in the plans per what Randy had to do. I tried this and didn't like the results as the nut touches the steel tube pedal frame as it rotates. Additionally its difficult to put the cotter pin on as there isn't much room. I am thinking of leaving it per the plans and checking the cotter pins in the preflight. Any suggestions / comments. Niko 40188 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 09, 2006
From: "Fred Williams, M.D." <drfred@cox-internet.com>
Subject: Fuel Injection 101
To Dick Sipp; I glad you were able to attend the recent class on fuel injection. For us that are still putting together the slow build wings, what do you consider are the benefits of going fuel injected? I'm concerned about initial cost, complexity, more to go wrong in flight, continued mantainence issues. I do understand that there is a fuel consumption saving and more efficiency. Thoughts? Thanks Fred Williams slow build wings. Just past getting the tanks done. Yea! no more pro seal for a while. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM
From: Michael D Chase <MChase(at)gdatp.com>
Date: Nov 09, 2006
I was wondering what you did to prep before paint? I am getting ready to pai nt my VIirticle tail this weekend. I am using dipping in Alidine before apply ing a self etching primer called SME. Michael Chase 40644 -------------------------- This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is for the sole use of th e intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is private, confiden tial, or exempt from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, copying, prin ting, disclosure, retention, or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply to this e- mail, and delete all copies without disclosing this message to others. Thank you. ----- Original Message ----- From: owner-rv10-list-server Sent: 11/09/2006 11:29 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM Brian I think you are right about the thickness. I have only done a few parts so far (the vertical stab skeleton) so it is not really an issue - just a lesson learned. I plan to just "mist" parts from now on so that I just have a thin primer film. I bought the paint from a Sherwin Williams outlet store. It is called SW DTM and can be found on their website at : http://makeashorterlink.com/?C1864622E Cheers Les Kearney #40643 - Day 3 of long journey -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Brian Douglas Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 8:38 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM Where'd you get the SW DTM primer? I've been looking for something a little less caustic, particularly since winter is looming over the midwest and my garage door will have to be mostly closed from now until March. I'm no expert but I think if you can't see underneath the primer, it's probably too thick. Unless you're planning to paint over it, you're goal is to put down an extra layer of corrosion protection. Ideally you want to achieve that aim with the minimum amount weight gain so the thinner the better - at least for parts that'll likely never be touched again. -Brian #40497 Iowa City, IA ------ Original Message ----- From: Les Kearney <mailto:kearney(at)shaw.ca> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 6:45 PM Subject: RV10-List: Priming - Sherwin Williams DTM Hi All A few weeks ago I asked about priming. After a lot of thought, I decided against most of the products currently in use primarily because I didn't want to use really noxious chemicals in an attached garage. As well, volatile hydrocarbons may have been interesting to use in the presence of a natgas garage heater. The product I decided to use is Sherwin Williams DTM (direct to metal) primer. It is water based and not as chemically interesting as other products. Today was day 2 of construction and my first experience with priming. I found the DTM easy to use with a standard air sprayer. Odor wise, it wasn't all that bad although I did use a cartridge air mask just to be safe as it was too cold to do this outside. It takes only a couple of hours to dry and seems to be reasonably scratch resistant. Can any of the primer experts on the list provide guidance as to how thick primer should be applied? Looking at the results of my work, it is apparent that I wasn't consistent in the application. Some parts seemed to have a much heaver coat than others. On some parts the primer is translucent while on others it covers completely. My feeling is that I should go lighter rather than heavier but am not sure. Comments? Suggestions? Inquiring minds need to know . Les Kearney #40643 - Day 2 of long journey href="http://www.aeroelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com href="http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com href="http://www.kitlog.com">www.kitlog.com href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com /Navigator?RV10-List ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 09, 2006
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's
What opinions are out there regarding which rivets to use to attach the cabin top to the fuse. I noticed that Tim started out using 426's and then switched to CS 4-4's. what experience have people had either way. Do the CS 4-4's interfere with the interior install?. Additionally, per previous posts regarding cracks and expansion between metal and fiberglass surfaces, Has anyone used the procedure that David McNeil posted regarding applying a thin fiberglass tape over the seam? inquiring minds want to know. Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ >* >* > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rene Felker" <rene(at)felker.com>
Subject: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's
Date: Nov 09, 2006
I used the CS 4-4's and plan on using David's suggestion on covering the seam. I will let you know how it turns out. I also put in the attach points for David's seat belts, but have not installed the belts because of my very slow pace on finishing the inside of the cabin. Rene' Felker 40322 Finish........ -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 12:35 PM Subject: RV10-List: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's What opinions are out there regarding which rivets to use to attach the cabin top to the fuse. I noticed that Tim started out using 426's and then switched to CS 4-4's. what experience have people had either way. Do the CS 4-4's interfere with the interior install?. Additionally, per previous posts regarding cracks and expansion between metal and fiberglass surfaces, Has anyone used the procedure that David McNeil posted regarding applying a thin fiberglass tape over the seam? inquiring minds want to know. Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ >* >* > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's
Date: Nov 09, 2006
CORRECTION: We are seaming around the windows and the rivet lines in the cowl to prevent rivet heads from working their way through the finished paint. We are not using a glass seam to cover the blinds in the lid attachment along the horizontal edge ----- only -----over the blinds on the top rear edge. Our goal is to prevent vibration of rivets in glass from working their way through the paint after a couple hundred hours. Just got a new camera and will attempt to show what I mean. We did it on my Glastar but missed a couple of places and it shows. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rene Felker" <rene(at)felker.com> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 12:59 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's > > I used the CS 4-4's and plan on using David's suggestion on covering the > seam. I will let you know how it turns out. I also put in the attach > points for David's seat belts, but have not installed the belts because of > my very slow pace on finishing the inside of the cabin. > > Rene' Felker > 40322 > Finish........ > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 12:35 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's > > > What opinions are out there regarding which rivets to use to attach the > cabin top to the fuse. I noticed that Tim started out using 426's and > then switched to CS 4-4's. what experience have people had either way. > Do the CS 4-4's interfere with the interior install?. > > Additionally, per previous posts regarding cracks and expansion between > metal and fiberglass surfaces, Has anyone used the procedure that > David McNeil posted regarding applying a thin fiberglass tape over the > seam? > > inquiring minds want to know. > > > Deems Davis # 406 > Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) > http://deemsrv10.com/ > > >>* >>* >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Thoughts after 35 hours
Date: Nov 09, 2006
From: "Scott Schmidt" <sschmidt(at)ussynthetic.com>
I now have 35 hours on the RV-10 and everything has gone almost perfect. I did want to point out the one issue that I did have about 6 hours ago and it may be something to look at. The tube that attaches on the left side of the baffles that feeds air to the oil cooler broke during flight. The ring has about 8 rivets in it but the tube is only tack welded in a couple of spots. My oil temps are normally around 185 and then they jumped to 213, it was still getting about =BD the air. Luckily it was 45 degrees out. I made four small brackets and reattached it so that it can't break again. That is a pretty weak piece though, you may want to reinforce to begin with. My #1 and #2 cylinders are running the hottest. I cut =BC" off the baffle that covers the #2 cylinder and it made a huge difference. Now #2 is 20 degrees cooler than #1. I am going to cut the other tonight. I had a bad Grand Rapids oil pressure sensor that was replaced. It would read either zero or 99. I hooked up a mechanical sensor and it showed 65 psi at a high idle so I replaced it. Apparently, they have had some issues with them so watch for that. One thing that I absolutely love is the throttle quadrant. I was afraid that I wouldn't get the fine tuning that I thought push pull controls give but I find myself pulling the throttle and the prop back together and I can adjust them much quicker and with more accuracy than the push pulls. I would highly recommend it if you are on the fence. The Cheltons are great but so are the Grand Rapids, I will have to write a side by side comparison as soon as I am more familiar with both. I am still tweaking the autopilot gains on both and learning the approach procedures on both. But I am very happy that I have the Cheltons, they are really nice. I love how the plane fly's with 3 or 4 people. With two you really need a little weight in the back to balance it out. My only problem now is that I can't stop flying long enough to paint the gear leg fairings. Scott Schmidt sschmidt(at)ussynthetic.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 09, 2006
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's
What are folks doing about the fiberglass to fuse seam then? It's cosmetically not very attractive. I would prefer not to leave it open, And previous posts warned bout filling gaps in dissimilar surfaces with body filler, due to uneven expansion rates. Why wouldn't the fiberglass tape technique work for this as well? Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ David McNeill wrote: > > CORRECTION: We are seaming around the windows and the rivet lines in > the cowl to prevent rivet heads from working their way through the > finished paint. We are not using a glass seam to cover the blinds in > the lid attachment along the horizontal edge ----- only -----over the > blinds on the top rear edge. Our goal is to prevent vibration of > rivets in glass from working their way through the paint after a > couple hundred hours. Just got a new camera and will attempt to show > what I mean. We did it on my Glastar but missed a couple of places and > it shows. > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rene Felker" <rene(at)felker.com> > To: > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 12:59 PM > Subject: RE: RV10-List: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's > > >> >> I used the CS 4-4's and plan on using David's suggestion on covering the >> seam. I will let you know how it turns out. I also put in the attach >> points for David's seat belts, but have not installed the belts >> because of >> my very slow pace on finishing the inside of the cabin. >> >> Rene' Felker >> 40322 >> Finish........ >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis >> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 12:35 PM >> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >> Subject: RV10-List: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's >> >> >> What opinions are out there regarding which rivets to use to attach the >> cabin top to the fuse. I noticed that Tim started out using 426's and >> then switched to CS 4-4's. what experience have people had either way. >> Do the CS 4-4's interfere with the interior install?. >> >> Additionally, per previous posts regarding cracks and expansion between >> metal and fiberglass surfaces, Has anyone used the procedure that >> David McNeil posted regarding applying a thin fiberglass tape over the >> seam? >> >> inquiring minds want to know. >> >> >> Deems Davis # 406 >> Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) >> http://deemsrv10.com/ >> >> >>> * >>> * >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's
Date: Nov 09, 2006
It may as well; we are checking with experts at the Big Airplane Co. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Deems Davis" <deemsdavis(at)cox.net> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 1:38 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's > > What are folks doing about the fiberglass to fuse seam then? It's > cosmetically not very attractive. I would prefer not to leave it open, And > previous posts warned bout filling gaps in dissimilar surfaces with body > filler, due to uneven expansion rates. Why wouldn't the fiberglass tape > technique work for this as well? > > Deems Davis # 406 > Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) > http://deemsrv10.com/ > > David McNeill wrote: > >> >> CORRECTION: We are seaming around the windows and the rivet lines in the >> cowl to prevent rivet heads from working their way through the finished >> paint. We are not using a glass seam to cover the blinds in the lid >> attachment along the horizontal edge ----- only -----over the blinds on >> the top rear edge. Our goal is to prevent vibration of rivets in glass >> from working their way through the paint after a couple hundred hours. >> Just got a new camera and will attempt to show what I mean. We did it on >> my Glastar but missed a couple of places and it shows. >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rene Felker" <rene(at)felker.com> >> To: >> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 12:59 PM >> Subject: RE: RV10-List: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's >> >> >>> >>> I used the CS 4-4's and plan on using David's suggestion on covering the >>> seam. I will let you know how it turns out. I also put in the attach >>> points for David's seat belts, but have not installed the belts because >>> of >>> my very slow pace on finishing the inside of the cabin. >>> >>> Rene' Felker >>> 40322 >>> Finish........ >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >>> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis >>> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 12:35 PM >>> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >>> Subject: RV10-List: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's >>> >>> >>> What opinions are out there regarding which rivets to use to attach the >>> cabin top to the fuse. I noticed that Tim started out using 426's and >>> then switched to CS 4-4's. what experience have people had either way. >>> Do the CS 4-4's interfere with the interior install?. >>> >>> Additionally, per previous posts regarding cracks and expansion between >>> metal and fiberglass surfaces, Has anyone used the procedure that >>> David McNeil posted regarding applying a thin fiberglass tape over the >>> seam? >>> >>> inquiring minds want to know. >>> >>> >>> Deems Davis # 406 >>> Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) >>> http://deemsrv10.com/ >>> >>> >>>> * >>>> * >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ddddsp1(at)juno.com" <ddddsp1(at)juno.com>
Date: Nov 09, 2006
Subject: Re: Thoughts after 35 hours
NOTHING in Nebraska?...........I usually read these post and blow most o f the snipes off....but not when you DIG on Nebraska. LOL. I will giv e both your families ROOM and BOARD if you meet in Grand Island, Nebrask a to check each others planes. It is a 2.5 hour flight for Tim and a 3. 8 hour flight(tailwind) for Scott to GI, NE. Plus 100LL is down to $3.17 per gal. Scott, I put a nice bead of PROSEAL around the oil cooler flange as I d id not like the tack welds on it either. I also put Proseal on the flan ge to seal/cushion it to the baffling. I love Proseal!!!! OK, with Free room and board and cheap gas............is it more enticin g to come to NE now TIM? :) You guys still make me envious when you discuss your flying... BUT, 805H L will be flying with the best YUGO panel ever .....SOON. Open invitation, Dean 40449 ________________________________________________________________________

NOTHING in Nebraska?...........I usually read these post and bl ow most of the snipes off....but not when you DIG on Nebraska.  LOL .   I will give both your families ROOM and BOARD if you meet in Grand Island, Nebraska to check each others planes.  It is a 2.5 hour flight for Tim and a 3.8 hour flight(tailwind) for Scott to G I, NE. Plus 100LL is down to $3.17 per gal.   

Scott,  I put a nice bead of PROSEAL around the oil cooler flang e as I did not like the tack welds on it either.  I also put Prosea l on the flange to seal/cushion it to the baffling.  I love Proseal !!!!

OK, with Free room and board and cheap gas............is it more enti cing to come to NE now TIM?  :)

You guys still make me envious when you discuss your flying... BUT, 8 05HL will be flying with the best YUGO panel ever .....SOON.

Open invitation,

Dean 40449



______________________ __________________________________________________
Visit http://www.juno.com/value to sign up today!

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: glassing rivets into glass
Date: Nov 09, 2006
Two pictures of my Glastar ; One had the rivets in the cowl seamed over with a single layer (1") of E glass. The rivets holding the oil access door did not have a layer of glass. The rivet heads appeared between 100-200 TT. The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments: IMG_0020 IMG_0021 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 09, 2006
From: Jack Lockamy <jacklockamy(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Weathermeister
For those who aren't aware... there is an OUTSTANDING new tool available for aviation weather info. Check out www.weathermeister.com This aviation weather website was developed and is maintained by Dan Checkoway (aka 'Sharpie') who is a SoCAL RV-7 builder/formation pilot and frequent contributor to Kitplanes Magazine. Many of you have probably visited his RV-7 website.... www.rvproject.com. Hands down the best RV builder website on the internet. Dan has created a MASTERPIECE!!! Weathermeister.com is a FREE web-based tool that will absolutely change the way you currently get your weather infomation when flying locally or coast-to-coast in your RV. After experiencing www.weathermeister.com, you will NEVER go back to DUATS. Weathermeister.com displays numerous weather charts, winds aloft info, best economy and best speed altitudes to fly based on up-to-the-minute winds aloft data, TFRs, forecast weather conditions at your destination and airports under your flight path, and much, much more. If you sign up for the premium service ($4.95 monthly or $49.95 yearly...), you can store your own aircraft info and frequently flown cross-country routes that will accurately give you fuel burn, ETE, etc. The premium service is an unbelievable value once you see how powerful, and easy to use the tools available really are. I encourage everyone to visit www.weathermeister.com., evaluate it's awesome capabilities, and sign-up for the premium service to keep the site alive! (NOTE: The Premium service provides a LOT more info than the free site.) As a government employee, I still don't understand how a fellow like Dan Checkoway can single-handedly provide such a useful tool for evaluating flight weather conditions when the entire government (read FAA...) can not provide readable or barely understandable weather info to us. Weathermeister.com displays it all so clearly. If you haven't checked out www.weathermeister.com, you owe it to yourself to try it. I use it EVERY time I intend to fly... Tell a friend about the site. They WILL thank you!!! Jack Lockamy RV-7A N174JL 250 hrs. Camarillo, CA www.jacklockamy.com NOTE: Although Dan C. is a friend of mine, he is not aware of this posting nor did he endorse this message. I am in no way affiliated with www.weathermeister.com. I'm just a a VERY grateful user that appreciates the weather tool Dan has created and wanted to share it with my fellow RV builders/pilots who may not have discovered it yet. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "gary" <speckter(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's
Date: Nov 09, 2006
Rough up the aluminum and it will work just fine. I plan on doing it that way. Gary Specketer 40274 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 3:39 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's What are folks doing about the fiberglass to fuse seam then? It's cosmetically not very attractive. I would prefer not to leave it open, And previous posts warned bout filling gaps in dissimilar surfaces with body filler, due to uneven expansion rates. Why wouldn't the fiberglass tape technique work for this as well? Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ David McNeill wrote: > > CORRECTION: We are seaming around the windows and the rivet lines in > the cowl to prevent rivet heads from working their way through the > finished paint. We are not using a glass seam to cover the blinds in > the lid attachment along the horizontal edge ----- only -----over the > blinds on the top rear edge. Our goal is to prevent vibration of > rivets in glass from working their way through the paint after a > couple hundred hours. Just got a new camera and will attempt to show > what I mean. We did it on my Glastar but missed a couple of places and > it shows. > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rene Felker" <rene(at)felker.com> > To: > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 12:59 PM > Subject: RE: RV10-List: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's > > >> >> I used the CS 4-4's and plan on using David's suggestion on covering the >> seam. I will let you know how it turns out. I also put in the attach >> points for David's seat belts, but have not installed the belts >> because of >> my very slow pace on finishing the inside of the cabin. >> >> Rene' Felker >> 40322 >> Finish........ >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis >> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 12:35 PM >> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >> Subject: RV10-List: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's >> >> >> What opinions are out there regarding which rivets to use to attach the >> cabin top to the fuse. I noticed that Tim started out using 426's and >> then switched to CS 4-4's. what experience have people had either way. >> Do the CS 4-4's interfere with the interior install?. >> >> Additionally, per previous posts regarding cracks and expansion between >> metal and fiberglass surfaces, Has anyone used the procedure that >> David McNeil posted regarding applying a thin fiberglass tape over the >> seam? >> >> inquiring minds want to know. >> >> >> Deems Davis # 406 >> Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) >> http://deemsrv10.com/ >> >> >>> * >>> * >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 09, 2006
From: Jack Lockamy <jacklockamy(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Weathermeister
For those who aren't aware... there is an OUTSTANDING new tool available for aviation weather info. Check out www.weathermeister.com This aviation weather website was developed and is maintained by Dan Checkoway (aka 'Sharpie') who is a SoCAL RV-7 builder/formation pilot and frequent contributor to Kitplanes Magazine. Many of you have probably visited his RV-7 website.... www.rvproject.com. Hands down the best RV builder website on the internet. Dan has created a MASTERPIECE!!! Weathermeister.com is a FREE web-based tool that will absolutely change the way you currently get your weather infomation when flying locally or coast-to-coast in your RV. After experiencing www.weathermeister.com, you will NEVER go back to DUATS. Weathermeister.com displays numerous weather charts, winds aloft info, best economy and best speed altitudes to fly based on up-to-the-minute winds aloft data, TFRs, forecast weather conditions at your destination and airports under your flight path, and much, much more. If you sign up for the premium service ($4.95 monthly or $49.95 yearly...), you can store your own aircraft info and frequently flown cross-country routes that will accurately give you fuel burn, ETE, etc. The premium service is an unbelievable value once you see how powerful, and easy to use the tools available really are. I encourage everyone to visit www.weathermeister.com., evaluate it's awesome capabilities, and sign-up for the premium service to keep the site alive! (NOTE: The Premium service provides a LOT more info than the free site.) As a government employee, I still don't understand how a fellow like Dan Checkoway can single-handedly provide such a useful tool for evaluating flight weather conditions when the entire government (read FAA...) can not provide readable or barely understandable weather info to us. Weathermeister.com displays it all so clearly. If you haven't checked out www.weathermeister.com, you owe it to yourself to try it. I use it EVERY time I intend to fly... Tell a friend about the site. They WILL thank you!!! Jack Lockamy RV-7A N174JL 250 hrs. Camarillo, CA www.jacklockamy.com NOTE: Although Dan C. is a friend of mine, he is not aware of this posting nor did he endorse this message. I am in no way affiliated with www.weathermeister.com. I'm just a a VERY grateful user that appreciates the weather tool Dan has created and wanted to share it with my fellow RV builders/pilots who may not have discovered it yet. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Marcus Cooper" <coop85(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Weathermeister
Date: Nov 09, 2006
Hmmm, as a government employee, how can you possibly not understand how an individual can develop a successful product that the entire government cannot. Sorry, couldn't be helped ;) Thanks for the link though! Marcus -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jack Lockamy Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 7:52 PM Subject: RV10-List: Weathermeister For those who aren't aware... there is an OUTSTANDING new tool available for aviation weather info. Check out www.weathermeister.com This aviation weather website was developed and is maintained by Dan Checkoway (aka 'Sharpie') who is a SoCAL RV-7 builder/formation pilot and frequent contributor to Kitplanes Magazine. Many of you have probably visited his RV-7 website.... www.rvproject.com. Hands down the best RV builder website on the internet. Dan has created a MASTERPIECE!!! Weathermeister.com is a FREE web-based tool that will absolutely change the way you currently get your weather infomation when flying locally or coast-to-coast in your RV. After experiencing www.weathermeister.com, you will NEVER go back to DUATS. Weathermeister.com displays numerous weather charts, winds aloft info, best economy and best speed altitudes to fly based on up-to-the-minute winds aloft data, TFRs, forecast weather conditions at your destination and airports under your flight path, and much, much more. If you sign up for the premium service ($4.95 monthly or $49.95 yearly...), you can store your own aircraft info and frequently flown cross-country routes that will accurately give you fuel burn, ETE, etc. The premium service is an unbelievable value once you see how powerful, and easy to use the tools available really are. I encourage everyone to visit www.weathermeister.com., evaluate it's awesome capabilities, and sign-up for the premium service to keep the site alive! (NOTE: The Premium service provides a LOT more info than the free site.) As a government employee, I still don't understand how a fellow like Dan Checkoway can single-handedly provide such a useful tool for evaluating flight weather conditions when the entire government (read FAA...) can not provide readable or barely understandable weather info to us. Weathermeister.com displays it all so clearly. If you haven't checked out www.weathermeister.com, you owe it to yourself to try it. I use it EVERY time I intend to fly... Tell a friend about the site. They WILL thank you!!! Jack Lockamy RV-7A N174JL 250 hrs. Camarillo, CA www.jacklockamy.com NOTE: Although Dan C. is a friend of mine, he is not aware of this posting nor did he endorse this message. I am in no way affiliated with www.weathermeister.com. I'm just a a VERY grateful user that appreciates the weather tool Dan has created and wanted to share it with my fellow RV builders/pilots who may not have discovered it yet. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 09, 2006
From: Bill DeRouchey <billderou(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's
I scrapped the pop rivets and used AN426A-3-10 "soft rivets" and cut the length to size. If you have already drilled the holes for pop rivets then use the AN426A-4. Set the rivet gun at 60 psi and hit it lightly. Crushing the fiberglass was a non-issue. Bill DeRouchey billderou(at)yahoo.com N939SB flying It may as well; we are checking with experts at the Big Airplane Co. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Deems Davis" Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 1:38 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's > > What are folks doing about the fiberglass to fuse seam then? It's > cosmetically not very attractive. I would prefer not to leave it open, And > previous posts warned bout filling gaps in dissimilar surfaces with body > filler, due to uneven expansion rates. Why wouldn't the fiberglass tape > technique work for this as well? > > Deems Davis # 406 > Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) > http://deemsrv10.com/ > > David McNeill wrote: > >> >> CORRECTION: We are seaming around the windows and the rivet lines in the >> cowl to prevent rivet heads from working their way through the finished >> paint. We are not using a glass seam to cover the blinds in the lid >> attachment along the horizontal edge ----- only -----over the blinds on >> the top rear edge. Our goal is to prevent vibration of rivets in glass >> from working their way through the paint after a couple hundred hours. >> Just got a new camera and will attempt to show what I mean. We did it on >> my Glastar but missed a couple of places and it shows. >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rene Felker" >> To: >> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 12:59 PM >> Subject: RE: RV10-List: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's >> >> >>> >>> I used the CS 4-4's and plan on using David's suggestion on covering the >>> seam. I will let you know how it turns out. I also put in the attach >>> points for David's seat belts, but have not installed the belts because >>> of >>> my very slow pace on finishing the inside of the cabin. >>> >>> Rene' Felker >>> 40322 >>> Finish........ >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >>> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis >>> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 12:35 PM >>> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >>> Subject: RV10-List: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's >>> >>> >>> What opinions are out there regarding which rivets to use to attach the >>> cabin top to the fuse. I noticed that Tim started out using 426's and >>> then switched to CS 4-4's. what experience have people had either way. >>> Do the CS 4-4's interfere with the interior install?. >>> >>> Additionally, per previous posts regarding cracks and expansion between >>> metal and fiberglass surfaces, Has anyone used the procedure that >>> David McNeil posted regarding applying a thin fiberglass tape over the >>> seam? >>> >>> inquiring minds want to know. >>> >>> >>> Deems Davis # 406 >>> Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) >>> http://deemsrv10.com/ >>> >>> >>>> * >>>> * >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 09, 2006
From: Eric Panning <ericmpmail-rv10(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: O540 crank issues?
All, While slowly building my RV-10 I also fly a Cherokee 180 and follow the piperowner board. Three issues with O540 failures not subject to the AD caught my attention and I decided to pass it on. "This is kind of disturbing, but two PA32 accidents in the last about 30 days have claimed a total of 4 lives. The scary thing is they were both engine failures with rods being thrown around the #6 journal, holes in the cases. That and seeing the pictures of Kent's crank busted up from a failure is making me wonder if an crank AD may be coming for the O540's." Larry KRHV http://www.aviationfeeds.com/feeds/accident.py?ev_id 061108X01626&key=1 http://www.aviationfeeds.com/feeds/accident.py?ev_id 061108X01628&key=1 description from Kent about initial problem with his Dakota: "Took our '79 Dakota out today to shake some bugs off. About 15 min into the flight engine acted as though it had been leaned too much and began loosing power, and shortly there after,began to vibrate. Oil pressure, oil temp, manifold pressure, prop and RPM were all OK. Applied carb heat and headed back to AP. Seemed like she was trying to run on 3 of 6. Flew about 6 min to home base, cleared traffic in the pattern and landed w/o further problems. A quick check revieled no apparent oil leaks to indicate cracked case and/or jugs, prop OK oil level OK. Does seem to be something binding when prop is hand pulled. Too Dark and late of Friday to go further. Towed it back to the T-hanger and will have mechanics run compressions, drain oil and, cut oil filter open next week. Anyone had something like this happen on their 0540 before? If so, what do you suggest we look for? I have a bad feeling that the loss in power might have something to do with valves, but the vibration is more disturbing. Engine is at about 1200hrs since major and has been flown regularly at least 15-20hr/month." Update: "Pulled the plugs and found oil in bottom of #4. Pulled #4 jug and it got worse. Turns out that the root cause is a broken crank. Disturbing in that this 0540 crank was not subject to the last two AD's. The break was clean and occured across the rear counterweight of the #4 journal. " I have some close up pics if anyone is interested. Hopefully this will not lead to yet another crank AD. I would say a rare event, but unfortunately not rare enough. FYI: Cherokee Chat on the www.piperowner.com site is a close knit group of very experienced piper owners and very informative. It is worth the membership even if you do not fly a piper and I plan on continuing my membership even after I sell. A handful of board members have started bulding RV's too. Eric ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's
Date: Nov 09, 2006
Its my understanding that the problem is not visual crushing of the glass but "fractures" in the matrix at the micro level. Same problem with Van's single hardpoint for the shoulder harnesses and a single #5 countersunk screw to hold the harness. over time the pulling on the belt will create micro fractures that will pull through quite easily in a crash. ----- Original Message ----- From: Bill DeRouchey To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 9:17 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's I scrapped the pop rivets and used AN426A-3-10 "soft rivets" and cut the length to size. If you have already drilled the holes for pop rivets then use the AN426A-4. Set the rivet gun at 60 psi and hit it lightly. Crushing the fiberglass was a non-issue. Bill DeRouchey billderou(at)yahoo.com N939SB flying David McNeill wrote: It may as well; we are checking with experts at the Big Airplane Co. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Deems Davis" To: Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 1:38 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's > > What are folks doing about the fiberglass to fuse seam then? It's > cosmetically not very attractive. I would prefer not to leave it open, And > previous posts warned bout filling gaps in dissimilar surfaces with body > filler, due to uneven expansion rates. Why wouldn't the fiberglass tape > technique work for this as well? > > Deems Davis # 406 > Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) > http://deemsrv10.com/ > > David McNeill wrote: > >> >> CORRECTION: We are seaming around the windows and the rivet lines in the >> cowl to prevent rivet heads from working their way through the finished >> paint. We are not using a glass seam to cover the blinds in the lid >> attachment along the horizontal edge ----- only -----over the blinds on >> the top rear edge. Our goal is to prevent vibration of rivets in glass >> from working their way through the paint after a couple hundred hours. >> Just got a new camera and will attempt to show what I mean. We did it on >> my Glastar but missed a couple of places and it shows. >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rene Felker" >> To: >> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 12:59 PM >> Subject: RE: RV10-List: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's >> >> >>> >>> I used the CS 4-4's and plan on using David's suggestion on covering the >>> seam. I will let you know how it turns out. I also put in the attach >>> points for David's seat belts, but have not installed the belts because >>> of >>> my very slow pace on finishing the inside of the cabin. >>> >>> Rene' Felker >>> 40322 >>> Finish........ >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >>> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis >>> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 12:35 PM >>> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >>> Subject: RV10-List: Cabin top attach - CS 4-4's or AN426-AD4's >>> >>> >>> What opinions are out there regarding which rivets to use to attach the >>> cabin top to the fuse. I noticed that Tim started out using 426's and >>> then switched to CS 4-4's. what experience have people had either way. >>> Do the CS 4-4's interfere with the interior install?. >>> >>> Additionally, per ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Turbo 10
Date: Nov 10, 2006
From: "Patrick Pulis" <patrick.pulis(at)seagas.com.au>
Sorry Deems, Alzheimer's setting in, should read 40299. -----Original Message----- From: Deems Davis [mailto:deemsdavis(at)cox.net] Sent: Friday, 10 November 2006 1:03 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Turbo 10 Patrick, I noticed that you builder # is listed as 40822. Normally that would imply Van's has sold at least 822 RV-10 kits. The highest number that I had seen to date was in the mid to upper 600's. Is there a special Van's numbering system for OZ? Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ Patrick Pulis wrote: > Gentlemen, the turbo 10 lives at Goolwa in South Australia and has > been modified by Jon Johansen, who has flow his RV-4 twice around the > world and once to Antarctica. As I understand it, the leading edges > have also been converted to a full span fuel tank, as have the tips. > Jon's RV has a completely wet wing, which has enabled it to have > endurance in excess of 16 hours. Jon also recently ferried an RV-8 > across the Pacific from the US. What I am trying to say here guys is > that there is an incredible amount of RV experience in this project. > > Regards > > Patrick > Adelaide, South Australia > RV-10 S/No. 40822 > >* >* > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 10, 2006
From: Niko <owl40188(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Baggage Door Hinge
Well , here are the pictures. I am really happy with the way this came ou t. Its a worthwhile mod.=0A=0ANiko=0A40188=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: David Maib <dmaib(at)mac.com>=0ATo: rv10-list(at)matronics.com=0ASen t: Thursday, November 9, 2006 10:23:32 AM=0ASubject: Re: RV10-List: Baggage Door Hinge=0A=0ANiko,=0AI would love to see some photos, if possible.=0A =0A=0ADavid Maib=0A40559=0A=0A=0AOn Nov 9, 2006, at 9:02 AM, Nikolaos Napol i wrote:=0A=0A=0AThis morning I drilled out the rivets holding the hinge to the frame and replaced them with number 6 nutplates and screws. It worked very well. The two things I did is not to fully countersink the hinge for the head of the screws as its not very thick and its not necessary as ther e is some clearance when the door is closed. Second I left out the nutplat e in the middle of the frame as it inteferes with the longeron. The longer on could be trimmed slightly at this location and the nutplate added if one deems this necessary as it ends at this location i.e. there can't be any l oad in it. Overall it took 2 hrs. Another item that makes is relatively f ast is that since the nutplate holes are considerably larger than the exist ing #3 rivet holes drilling out the rivets goes considerably faster as one does not have to be as carefull.=0A =0ANiko=0A40188=0A=0A=0A=0A----- Origin al Message ----=0AFrom: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>=0ATo: rv10-list@ma tronics.com=0ASent: Wednesday, November 8, 2006 10:38:19 AM=0ASubject: Re: s Davis =0A=0ANiko. I wasn't as smart as Rick, and didn 't think of his options. I =0Afound out that I had a clearance issue after I recessed the hinge more =0Athan the plans allowed for. I ended up removin g some of the fuse skin in =0Athe fwd upper corner sufficient to allow for pin insertion and removal =0Awhen the door is open. As you will see from th e pic in the link, it =0Aleaves a small gap, that I will close by pro-seali ng a piece of ,032 to =0Athe top corner of the baggage door, so that when i t's closed, the gap =0Awill close also.=0A=0Ahttp://deemsrv10.com/album/Sec %2034%20Baggage%20Door/slides/DSC02782.html=0A=0ADeems Davis # 406=0AFinish ing - ( A Misnomer ! )=0Ahttp://deemsrv10.com/=0A=0ANikolaos Napoli wrote: =0A=0A> Well I looked at method number 1 this morning and I don't think its =0A> such a good idea. The hole would have to be riding the radius of the =0A> longeron. Thats not such a good thing. I think I will use methond =0A> #2. Its also possible to remove the door and use method 2 later on by =0A> simply drilling out the rivets (door frame to hinge) =0A> =0A> Niko =0A> 40188=0A>=0A> ----- Original Message ----=0A> From: Nikolaos Napoli <o wl40188(at)yahoo.com>=0A> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com=0A> Sent: Monday, Novemb er 6, 2006 3:16:10 PM=0A> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Baggage Door Hinge=0A>=0A > Rick=0A> =0A> Those are good ideas. I will try #1.=0A> =0A> =0A> Do n ot archive=0A> =0A> Thanks again for all the responses.=0A> =0A>=0A> Niko =0A>=0A> 40182=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A> ----- Original Message ----=0A> From: Rick G ray =0A> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com=0A> Sent: Mon day, November 6, 2006 1:25:09 PM=0A> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Baggage Door H inge=0A>=0A> OK....here's 2 options that I came up with that will allow EAS Y =0A> removal of the door with NO RISK of scratching the paint on the airp lane:=0A> =0A> 1-install the cabin side of the hinge with platenuts....whe n/if you =0A> need to remove the door you simply remove the platenut screws and the =0A> door comes off WITH BOTH SIDES of the hinge....savvy??=0A> =0A> 2-drill a 3/32 hole in the longeron ABOVE the hinge pin. Make the pin =0A> longer than it needs to be and you can easily remove the pin from =0A> INSIDE the airplane. The small portion of the pin inside can be =0A> 'dres sed up', hidden, or covered by the headliner...your =0A> choice.....savvy?? =0A> =0A> Either option above allows you to recess the hinge more than the =0A> plans....read: your hinge is NOT hangin' out in the breeze. Again...N O =0A> CHANCE of scratching airplane paint.=0A> =0A> I chose option 2 and am very pleased with the result.=0A> =0A> No charge for this one :^).=0A> =0A> Rick in Ohio at the Buffalo Farm - too many projects to list - RV10 =0A> nearing completion=0A> http://rv6rick.tripod.com/ohiovalleyrvators/=0A >=0A> ----- Original Message -----=0A> *From:* Nikolaos Napoli =0A> *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com =0A> *Sent:* Monday, November 06, 2006 11:46 AM=0A> *Subject:* Re: RV10-List: Baggage Door Hinge=0A>=0A> =0A> Jess e and Rob thanks yor your replies=0A> =0A> It looked like I would have an easier time inserting the pin from=0A> the bottom rather than t he top, however, obviously this would not=0A> be acceptable as the pin could fall out during flight. My=0A> hinge does stick out just a sligh t bit but it sticks out about the=0A> same amount top and bottom. I di dn't see anything in the manual=0A> talking about this. Well I can alw ays cut the hinge if I need to=0A> take it out. Maybe a light thinning of the diameter and some=0A> lubricating oil would get it in/out. =0A> =0A> Thanks=0A> =0A>=0A> Niko=0A>=0A> 40188=0A>=0A> =0A>=0A> ----- Original Message ----=0A> From: Jesse Saint <jesse@i tecusa.org>=0A> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com=0A> Sent: Monday, Novem ber 6, 2006 10:01:35 AM=0A> Subject: RE: RV10-List: Baggage Door Hinge =0A>=0A> The design and the plans have it so the top of the hinge stick s=0A> out just a little bit so you can pull the pin from the top. It i s=0A> all sits flush, you will have a very hard time removing the pin, =0A> which is what you are saying, I think. You might want to check=0A > the plans and make sure you didn=A2t misread the way you were=0A> supposed to install it.=0A>=0A> =0A>=0A> Jesse Saint=0A>=0A> I-TEC, Inc.=0A>=0A> jesse(at)itecusa.org =0A>=0A > www.itecusa.org <http://www.itecusa.org/>=0A>=0A> W: 352-465-4545 =0A>=0A> C: 352-427-0285=0A>=0A> ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------=0A>=0A> *From:* owner-rv10-list- server(at)matronics.com=0A> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of=0A> *Nikolaos Napoli=0A> *Sent:* Monday, November 06, 2006 9:40 AM=0A> *To:* Matronics=0A> *Subject:* RV10-List: Baggage Door Hinge=0A>=0A> =0A>=0A> I was going to rivet the Baggage Door Hinge Frame to the Side=0A> Skins this weekend and noticed that once I do this it will be=0A> difficult to install the door and get the door hinge wire in=0A> place. It looks like on my installation once the doo r is=0A> installed one can't pull out the hinge wire. In fact I need t o=0A> install the door hinge wire and door prior to riveting the door =0A> hinge frame. Is this typicall to what other builders experienced? =0A>=0A> =0A>=0A> thanks=0A> =0A>=0A> Niko=0A>=0A> 40 188=0A>=0A>* *=0A>=0A>* *=0A>=0A>**=0A>=0A>**=0A>=0A>**=0A>=0A>*www.aeroe lectric.com*=0A>=0A>*www.kitlog.com*=0A>=0A>**=0A>=0A>**=0A>=0A>**=0A>=0A>* *=0A>=0A>*http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List*=0A>=0A>*=0A> *=0A> =0A> -- Release Date: 11/4/2006=0A>=0A> --=0A> No virus found i n this outgoing message.=0A> 11/4/2006=0A>=0A>*www.aeroelbuildersbooks. com/"; target=_blank rel=nofollow>www.buildersbooks.comwwA href="http ://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List"; target=_blank rel==== ====0A>=0A> <http://www.homebuilthelp.com/>*=0A>=0A>=0A> =0A>=0A>*=0A>=0A>href="http://www.aeroelectric.com ">www.aeroelectric.com* =0A>*href="http:// www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com>=0A>href="http://www.kitlog. com">www.kitlog.com>=0A>href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilt help.com>=0A>href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List" target ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matron ics.com/Navigator?RV10-List=0A>=0A>*=0A>=0A>*www.aeroelectric.com=0A>erowar e Enterprises www.homebuilthelp./www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List"; ta rget=_blank rel=nofollow>http===0A>=0A> <http://www.kitlog.com/>* =0A>=0A>=0A> <http://www.kitlog.com/>=0A>=0A>*www.aeroelectric.com< * Aer oware Enterprises * <http://www.kitlog.com/>*www.homebuilt//www.matronics.c om/Navigator?RV10-List"; target=_blank rel=nofollow>htt===0A>=0A> < http://www.kitlog.com/>*=0A&g -- Please Support Your bsp; * The Builder' s Bookstore www.homebbsp; -Matt Dralle, sp; - T he RV10-List Email Fom/Navigator?RV10-List" ==========0A =0A=0A -- Please Support Your Lists (And Get Some AWESOME FRE E November is the Annual List Fund Raiser. Click class="Apple-converted -space"> the Contribution link below to this year's Terrific class="Appl e-converted-space"> * AeroElectric www.aeroelectric.com * The Bui lder's Bookstore www.buildersbooks.com * Aeroware Enterprises www.kitlog. com * HomebuiltHELP www.homebuilthelp.com --> http://www.matronics.co m/contribution Thank you for your generous class="Apple-converted-space "> - The RV10-List Email Forum - class ="Apple-converted-space"> --> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Lis ====== ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 10, 2006
From: Les Kearney <kearney(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Electric Rudder Trim ala Vic Syracuse
Hi I have decided to add electric rudder trim before I complete the rudder. The theory being that it will be infinitely easier to do this before the rudder is completed. That being said, I want to shamelessly copy Vic's design as documented on Tim Olson's website (see http://myrv10.com/tips/mods/RudderTrim/index.html). The pictures are quire revealing (pun intended)! I see that the access panel is has a Ray Allen T2-7A servo and that the access panel sits on a flange that was riveted to the rudder skin. What I don't have are the dimensions of the access panel as well as its location on the rudder. I can guess but would prefer something a bit more accurate if available. Failing that, is the T2-7a servo dimensionally the same size as the T3-12A servo that came with the tail kit? If so, I can estimate the access panel size. Inquiring minds need to know ... Les Kearney RV10 # 40643 - Vertical Stab ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 10, 2006
From: Les Kearney <kearney(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Vertical Stab - The RV10 Signature Dent
Hi Whilst waiting my for my tools I spent some time trolling the list and builder websites for hints, tips & tricks. One =93gotcha=94 that was well discussed was the dent that comes from putting on the vertical stab skin and how to avoid it. In particular, the recommendation is to radius the VS1006, VS1013 and VS1005 vertical stab ribs in a manner similar to the instructions for the horizontal stab ribs (page 8-7 of the plans) taking off 1/8=94 or more. While attaching the vertical stab skin, I noticed a small dent forming even though had followed the instructions and radiused the corners of the ribs. The end result was I took the skin off before the dent became too noticeable and reworked the ribs. In this case I took considerably more material off the rib noses making the nose rounding much more pronounced that suggested by the Van=92s plans. The end result was no denting after all (just a barely noticeable bump on one side of the skin). For what it=92s worth, I found that the requirements shown for the horizontal stab are insufficient to prevent dents on the vertical stab. I ended up rounding the nose of each rib such that the side flanges were cut back by at least =BC=94. Les Kearney RV10 # 40643 - Vertical Stab : Ready to be rivetted! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Gonzalez" <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com>
Subject: Vertical Stab - The RV10 Signature Dent
Date: Nov 10, 2006
Les, You might consider bonding those nose ribs in place with a flexible epoxy or pro seal. I lubed my clecoes which made cleanup of the excess easy. The idea is to bond the ribs in while everything is clecoed. Then dissasemble and clean before riveting. Don't use these clecoes again while doing the fuel tanks, and or be sure to soak them in acetone. The result on the second VS I made was great. I did the same on the HS. Look in the archives. John G. 409 >From: Les Kearney <kearney(at)shaw.ca> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV10-List: Vertical Stab - The RV10 Signature Dent >Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 16:57:48 -0700 > >Hi > > >Whilst waiting my for my tools I spent some time trolling the list and >builder websites for hints, tips & tricks. One gotcha that was well >discussed was the dent that comes from putting on the vertical stab skin >and >how to avoid it. In particular, the recommendation is to radius the VS1006, >VS1013 and VS1005 vertical stab ribs in a manner similar to the >instructions >for the horizontal stab ribs (page 8-7 of the plans) taking off 1/8 or >more. > > >While attaching the vertical stab skin, I noticed a small dent forming even >though had followed the instructions and radiused the corners of the ribs. >The end result was I took the skin off before the dent became too >noticeable >and reworked the ribs. In this case I took considerably more material off >the rib noses making the nose rounding much more pronounced that suggested >by the Vans plans. The end result was no denting after all (just a barely >noticeable bump on one side of the skin). > > >For what its worth, I found that the requirements shown for the horizontal >stab are insufficient to prevent dents on the vertical stab. I ended up >rounding the nose of each rib such that the side flanges were cut back by >at >least . > > >Les Kearney > >RV10 # 40643 - Vertical Stab : Ready to be rivetted! > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 10, 2006
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Wiki...
Dear Listers, I added a new Wiki web site to the Matronics Email List features earlier this year. What's a Wiki, you ask? Well, here's the Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki) definition: A wiki (IPA: [ w .ki ] or [ wi .ki ] ) is a type of Web site that allows the visitors themselves to easily add, remove, and otherwise edit and change some available content, sometimes without the need for registration. This ease of interaction and operation makes a wiki an effective tool for collaborative authoring. The term wiki also can refer to the collaborative software itself (wiki engine) that facilitates the operation of such a Web site, or to certain specific wiki sites, including the computer science site (an original wiki), WikiWikiWeb, and on-line encyclopedias such as Wikipedia. Under the Matronics Email List Moniker, there is now a very nice List-specific Wiki available! It a place for Listers to put articles about any aviation topic that suits them. The purpose is to provide what the mailing lists do not: structure and persistence. The mailing lists are a fantastic resource to ask a question and get good (and bad and funny and annoying) answers. But once the question is asked and answered it is not in front of the List anymore. If a new person subscribes the next day, he/she does not see that information unless he/she goes to the trouble to search the archives, a hit or miss proposition. The result is that the same thread of conversation gets created and/or revisited. There are several things that happen as a result: 1. The person gets his or her question answered; 2. The information gets better as more people think about and answer the question; 3. The people who have seen the same question asked and answered get annoyed at seeing the same things over and over and over and ... So this is where the Wiki comes in. You know what questions you wanted answered. You may have asked or answered the question. You know the information is useful. So you put the information here, in the Matronics Email List Wiki! It doesn't matter that this information is 100% complete or correct. Just writing something creates a placeholder and makes useful information available immediately. It has the same immediacy as the mailing list but it has persistence and structure. But what if the information is incomplete or incorrect? No problem! Anyone else coming along can edit the article! If I write something and you discover something I have left out or stated incorrectly, you can fix it right then! So let's begin and make this the place for information about building, flying, maintaining, and understanding our airplanes. But what about whether something is "appropriate" or not? Don't worry. Write it down. Let the reader determine whether or not it is appropriate. If it is, he/she will read it. If it isn't, he/she won't. It's as simple as that. And when you do write that article you won't have to worry about whether some editor is going to decide whether or not to print it in a newsletter or whether the webmaster will have time to put it up on the web page. The last question I hear brewing out there is: if anyone can post anything, won't this just become a mass of garbage? Surprisingly, the answer is a resounding no. If you want proof, go visit the Wikipedia, a free-to-everyone encyclopedia written by whoever wants to write articles. The articles there are as good as anything I have read anywhere and anyone can add anything anytime they want to. So don't hesitate. Write it down. Put it here. It will never hurt anyone. The more information we get here, the more useful it will become to other people and the more information they will put here for YOU to use. Here's the URL to start (there are lots more bured under this starting place): http://www.matronics.com/wiki/index.php/Matronics:Community_Portal But please don't forget that this Wiki and all of the other Matronics Email List features are supported solely by YOUR Contributions!! November is List Fund Raiser month and there are lots of Free Gifts to be had with your qualifying Contribution. Please make a Contribution to support the continued operation and upgrade of these great services!!! Thank you! http://www.matronics.com/contribution Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steven DiNieri" <capsteve(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Electric Rudder Trim ala Vic Syracuse
Date: Nov 11, 2006
Just how necessary is this mod?? Has anyone flying their 10 had to put a wedge on the rudder to correct for an out of trim condition? I think it=92s a great idea just need to make sure its needed. Thinking about rudders=85. I=92m seriously considering mounting the nav/gs antenna in the rudder. I can=92t find a certified example with an external antenna in a control surface, I=92m not sure if that=92s on purpose. I=92m thinking that the rudder is fairly stationary in cruise and approach. So there shouldn=92t be a problem=85.. Steve 40205 Subject: RV10-List: Electric Rudder Trim ala Vic Syracuse Hi I have decided to add electric rudder trim before I complete the rudder. The theory being that it will be infinitely easier to do this before the rudder is completed. That being said, I want to shamelessly copy Vic=92s design as documented on Tim Olson=92s website (see HYPERLINK "http://myrv10.com/tips/mods/RudderTrim/index.html"http://myrv10.com/tips /mo ds/RudderTrim/index.html). The pictures are quire revealing (pun intended)! I see that the access panel is has a Ray Allen T2-7A servo and that the access panel sits on a flange that was riveted to the rudder skin. What I don=92t have are the dimensions of the access panel as well as its location on the rudder. I can guess but would prefer something a bit more accurate if available. Failing that, is the T2-7a servo dimensionally the same size as the T3-12A servo that came with the tail kit? If so, I can estimate the access panel size. Inquiring minds need to know ... Les Kearney RV10 # 40643 - Vertical Stab -- 11/10/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. 11/10/2006 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <mgeans(at)provide.net>
Subject: Possible insurance lead
Date: Nov 11, 2006
I know that the RV series is a VERY reputable aircraft and is probably one of the easiest to insure. Sometimes there are snags. As a "floater" on the Titan's T-51 list too, they are having typical insurance snafu's for a new airframe but one member posted a possible ray of light that may help some of you considering the Ellenfinger-miester (sp?) Subaru or other, this might be a good lead for you. The posting member wrote: No promises here, but a patient of mine gave me his card when I mentioned I may be building and flying a T-51. He is an insurance representative for AIR (Aviation Insurance Representatives) which is a division of Delta Pacific Services, Inc. Apparently he works extensively with EAA aircraft. His name is Bob Sorrell. You can call him at (888)265-0844 or email him at avinsrep(at)telebyte.com Let us know what you find out, I will CC this email to him. Roger Ludwig Jr F15DOC Poulbso WA Matt Geans Builder Wanna-be ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Ritter" <mritter509(at)msn.com>
Subject: Electric Rudder Trim ala Vic Syracuse
Date: Nov 11, 2006
I have to use a little right rudder to keep the ball centered. Without right rudder its about a half ball out to the right. Rudder trim is on my list of things to do. Mark (N410MR Flying) >From: "Steven DiNieri" <capsteve(at)adelphia.net> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: RE: RV10-List: Electric Rudder Trim ala Vic Syracuse >Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 01:52:43 -0500 > >Just how necessary is this mod?? Has anyone flying their 10 had to put a >wedge on the rudder to correct for an out of trim condition? I think its a >great idea just need to make sure its needed. > > >Thinking about rudders. Im seriously considering mounting the nav/gs >antenna in the rudder. I cant find a certified example with an external >antenna in a control surface, Im not sure if thats on purpose. Im >thinking that the rudder is fairly stationary in cruise and approach. So >there shouldnt be a problem.. > >Steve > >40205 > > >Subject: RV10-List: Electric Rudder Trim ala Vic Syracuse > > >Hi > > >I have decided to add electric rudder trim before I complete the rudder. >The >theory being that it will be infinitely easier to do this before the rudder >is completed. That being said, I want to shamelessly copy Vics design as >documented on Tim Olsons website (see HYPERLINK >"http://myrv10.com/tips/mods/RudderTrim/index.html"http://myrv10.com/tips/mo >ds/RudderTrim/index.html). > > >The pictures are quire revealing (pun intended)! I see that the access >panel >is has a Ray Allen T2-7A servo and that the access panel sits on a flange >that was riveted to the rudder skin. What I dont have are the dimensions >of the access panel as well as its location on the rudder. I can guess but >would prefer something a bit more accurate if available. Failing that, is >the T2-7a servo dimensionally the same size as the T3-12A servo that came >with the tail kit? If so, I can estimate the access panel size. > > >Inquiring minds need to know ... > > >Les Kearney > >RV10 # 40643 - Vertical Stab > > >-- >11/10/2006 > > >-- >No virus found in this outgoing message. >11/10/2006 > _________________________________________________________________ Add a Yahoo! contact to Windows Live Messenger for a chance to win a free trip! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 11, 2006
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Subject: Re: Electric Rudder Trim ala Vic Syracuse
I don't know of any RV-10's flying that don't either have a rudder tab wedge in place, or electric rudder trim. (I'm sure there's one somewhere though, but none that I know of....but they would probably not be flying perfectly straight) I myself have a wedge taped on. It looks fine, and works ok in cruise at lower power settings. The problem is, even adding 5-10kts is significant enough to make the wedge too much trim, and flying at lower speeds makes it too little. I didn't have any believe in rudder trim when I started. My previous plane didn't have it, and I didn't care. But as both my aircraft quality, and flying quality has improved with the RV-10, I now see it as a much more necessary item if you're going for a truly nice flying airplane. I wish I would have done it earlier, because it's harder to do after you've painted. As far as your antenna in the rudder, I would most certainly avoid that, from a balance standpoint, a wiring standpoint, and more. Even when doing the rudder trim, the builders who've checked with Van's had them recommend that the servo be mounted forward enough to balance the trim control on the aft side. I really think putting an antenna there is a bad idea...especially given the abundance of GOOD locations for the antenna. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying Steven DiNieri wrote: > Just how necessary is this mod?? Has anyone flying their 10 had to put a > wedge on the rudder to correct for an out of trim condition? I think > its a great idea just need to make sure its needed. > > > > Thinking about rudders. Im seriously considering mounting the nav/gs > antenna in the rudder. I cant find a certified example with an external > antenna in a control surface, Im not sure if thats on purpose. Im > thinking that the rudder is fairly stationary in cruise and approach. So > there shouldnt be a problem.. > > Steve > > 40205 > > > > *Subject:* RV10-List: Electric Rudder Trim ala Vic Syracuse > > I have decided to add electric rudder trim before I complete the rudder. > The theory being that it will be infinitely easier to do this before the > rudder is completed. That being said, I want to shamelessly copy Vics > design as documented on Tim Olsons website (see > http://myrv10.com/tips/mods/RudderTrim/index.html). > > > > The pictures are quire revealing (pun intended)! I see that the access > panel is has a Ray Allen T2-7A servo and that the access panel sits on a > flange that was riveted to the rudder skin. What I dont have are the > dimensions of the access panel as well as its location on the rudder. I > can guess but would prefer something a bit more accurate if available. > Failing that, is the T2-7a servo dimensionally the same size as the > T3-12A servo that came with the tail kit? If so, I can estimate the > access panel size. > > > Les Kearney > > RV10 # 40643 - Vertical Stab > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jesse Saint" <jesse(at)itecusa.org>
Subject: Electric Rudder Trim ala Vic Syracuse
Date: Nov 11, 2006
I would have to agree with Tim that putting antennas in the rudder might be a mistake. Not only with balance issues but also because of the wire wearing as the rudder moves. While it may remain fairly stationary in flight, it certainly moves a LOT while on the ground taxiing. I don=92t even like having the wires to the tail lights back there, but that is hard to avoid. As far as the need to rudder trim, all three -10=92s I have spent time in have electric trim and are regularly =93stepping on the ball=94, depending on how they are flying and how they are loaded. I also don=92t think I have seen one without at least the wedge. I don=92t know how much speed is lost when out of trim, but I imagine it is measureable enough to justify. If putting on just a wedge, I would recommend putting it on to trim for cruise, whether you like economy or speed. You definitely need some rudder in climb. With the options available (Aerotrim runs as little as $175 without the indicator), I think it is definitely a good mod to include. I have mentioned Aerotrim a number of times, so I will give a little more detail (I have no financial connection whatsoever). This guy is usually at the big shows with a little half-booth (and very not-impressive) and an airplane-through-the-head hat on. He is often sleeping, or at least playing with his dentures. He does, on the other hand, have a trim system that is STC=92ed or PMA=92ed for quite a few different certified airplanes. The servo supposedly has all metal gears, although I have not disassembled one to find out. The housing that the servo is in is not very professional, and the wires coming out of the servo or included with the system are very small (so are the Ray Allen=92s), but it works very well. There are two wires, so no real option for an indicator unless you use his, which I think comes centered just like the servo, and when you give power to run the servo, you are also sending the same power to the indicator that moves it. I haven=92t even considered using the indicator on the 10 trims that I have bought from him. The servo runs very slowly, which is fairly good for aileron or rudder trim, since those mostly need very minor adjustments during flight. The servo comes with a hinge that you rivet onto the trailing edge. It has a spring that keeps it from fluttering/shaking/vibrating. It comes from the factory/garage mechanically centered, so you want to attach the hinge to the arm coming out of the servo with it centered before you run the servo. It also comes with pop rivets to attach the servo to the skin of the aileron or rudder (it is VERY lightweight) after you cut the hole for it. On 4 of our installations we decided to use nutplates on the skin and #6 countersunk screws, which seems to be a good fit. The first 2 installations we made were done after the plane was flying and without removing either the aileron or rudder, so painting it ahead of time should make it a very easy installation for most people. For those considering it, I would recommend getting it without the toggle switch and without the bundle of wire that comes with it and without the indicator (you can easily see the state of the aileron trim in flight, and the ball is the indicator on the panel for the rudder trim). Well, that=92s it for now. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. HYPERLINK "mailto:jesse(at)itecusa.org"jesse(at)itecusa.org HYPERLINK "http://www.itecusa.org"www.itecusa.org W: 352-465-4545 C: 352-427-0285 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Steven DiNieri Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 1:53 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Electric Rudder Trim ala Vic Syracuse Just how necessary is this mod?? Has anyone flying their 10 had to put a wedge on the rudder to correct for an out of trim condition? I think it=92s a great idea just need to make sure its needed. Thinking about rudders=85. I=92m seriously considering mounting the nav/gs antenna in the rudder. I can=92t find a certified example with an external antenna in a control surface, I=92m not sure if that=92s on purpose. I=92m thinking that the rudder is fairly stationary in cruise and approach. So there shouldn=92t be a problem=85.. Steve 40205 Subject: RV10-List: Electric Rudder Trim ala Vic Syracuse Hi I have decided to add electric rudder trim before I complete the rudder. The theory being that it will be infinitely easier to do this before the rudder is completed. That being said, I want to shamelessly copy Vic=92s design as documented on Tim Olson=92s website (see HYPERLINK "http://myrv10.com/tips/mods/RudderTrim/index.html"http://myrv10.com/tips /mo ds/RudderTrim/index.html). The pictures are quire revealing (pun intended)! I see that the access panel is has a Ray Allen T2-7A servo and that the access panel sits on a flange that was riveted to the rudder skin. What I don=92t have are the dimensions of the access panel as well as its location on the rudder. I can guess but would prefer something a bit more accurate if available. Failing that, is the T2-7a servo dimensionally the same size as the T3-12A servo that came with the tail kit? If so, I can estimate the access panel size. Inquiring minds need to know ... Les Kearney RV10 # 40643 - Vertical Stab -- 11/10/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. 11/10/2006 "http://www.aeroelectric.com"www.aeroelectric.com "http://www.buildersbooks.com"www.buildersbooks.com "http://www.kitlog.com"www.kitlog.com "http://www.homebuilthelp.com"www.homebuilthelp.com "http://www.matronics.com/contribution"http://www.matronics.com/contribut ion "http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List"http://www.matronics.com/Na vig ator?RV10-List 11/10/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. 11/10/2006 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 11, 2006
From: "Pascal" <rv10builder(at)verizon.net>
Subject: AOPA engine vendor thoughts
This year there is an advantage to living in Southern California, that being that AOPA held the convention 1.5 hours drive away. So I took the drive up yesterday and took in all the sites. There were a lot of anxious companies ready to sell me their latest creations, some were really nice when I explained I had an "experimental RV-10 aircraft" (well we all know I don't, but I sure as heck wasn't going to go into details). Most, if not all of them, knew exactly what the plane was, which means there is a presence in the market, others were kind to explain their avionics cost as much as the completed RV-10 and yet 1 was short of completely brushing me off as "we don't have the time to spend selling to indivduals, have Van's contact us to work something out". Overall I had an enjoyable experience, this certainly isn't a Oshkosh but for me the distance made it well worth the effort. I spoke with Gus from Van's and he was great in taking all the time I needed to discuss the RV-10, I never led on that I knew he provided the Tech support nor that I had a clue about the RV-10. He kindly discussed the engineering of the wing and the idea of adding winglets (like the Lancairs Columbias have and the new option for the Husky') that adds 5mph in cruise and that it would add little to no benefit on the RV-10 shaped wings, which are different that the latter two. He also gave me his thoughts on the idea of sticking with a Lycoming 540 versus a Continental (higher weight and more GPH) and other "experimental engines". With that I went out and saw the vendors and tried to ascertain more knowledge for future planning. Lycoming Thunderbolt- I met up with Jon Delamarter and he gave me the latest on the Thunderbolt engines and the advancements they are making with a FADEC type concept as well as 10:1 pistons and a cold fusion system, I could tell he was really excited about the future technology that Thunderbolt is coming out with in the next year and the competitive pricing. I left pretty excited myself seeing where they have gotten since starting up and what is yet to come from them. SMA- I'll try to be nice here but I was totally disappointed with them. I figured they had a good case for less GPH higher TBO of 3K hrs, integrated engine monitoring and using diesel but the sales guy attitude mysteriusly diminished when I told them I wanted it for an experimental, he simply didn't see my as a potential customer, to the people around me they handed out brochures and went through it with them, with me there was nothing, no brochure no "need" to review and the advice to get everyone to tell Van's that they need to contact SMA so builders can use the engines but until Van's does (which I understand they have no interest in anything other than what Gus mentioned, the Lycoming) SMA has no interest in working with the builders- to hell with them I thought and moved on to better solutions. Superior XP400- Interesting is what I thought. They have the XP400SRE that can put out 250hp, it was tested in the Lancair @ the Reno races and seemed like an option, I found it interesting, maybe because there is only the one engine out there but the sales guy, although very nice, really didn't know much about the engine.. how much does.will it cost?, what is the GPH? what is the TBO? can I build this engine like the XP-360?, etc.. his response "I'll look that up in my binder... hmm nothing there.. sorry, shame on me but I don't have the answer" is what I got for each question. I saw numerous avionics in action, Op Tech, Dynon, Garmin, Chelton and they all have great features and nice looking displays, although Optech had the best support crew (in regards to explaining all the features and admitting future fixes for gaps, Chelton seemed to address those gaps headon with "current fix in new release" for people like Tim, I overheard there is a new code released for the Chelton that is far superior to the previous version, or so the sales person was telling a potential customer, it is either still beta or just released but worth looking into. Based on the convention I am sold on the Van's support from Gus, he took his time, never felt rushed and the answers were honest, well researched and to the point. Engine wise, I am even more sold on the Thunderbolt, a new engine with custom options and a rep that knew his engine, pricing, current developments and anxious to work with the RV-10 builders to get us the right engine for our plane.. the other vendors just didn't seem to even come close to this. Overall, a great experience! Pascal ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DejaVu" <wvu(at)ameritel.net>
Subject: Engine trouble shoots-High #2 & #4 EGTs -Update
Date: Nov 11, 2006
I ran my engine yesterday continuing to troubleshoot the high EGTs (~1500deg) on #2 & #4. I'm starting to think my spider is not performing consistently. Below is the summary. Swapped EGT probes. Problem did not follow the probes - sensors appear ok. CHT's consistently around 40deg higher for these cylinders. Noted exhaust discoloration on 2 & 4. No doubt these were running hotter than the rest. Swapped #1 and #4 injectors. #1 EGT (which now has #4 injector) was normal, leading me to believe #4 injector was fine. #4 EGT (which now has #1 injector) is still hot. Checked Slicks timing. All ok. In talking to David McNeill on the phone he gave me a few ideas to go after, which I did today: Fuel flow tested using 6 baby food jars in five "runs". Boost pump turned on for about 20 seconds. Indicated (EIS6000) fuel pressure around 23psi, fuel flow around 3.7gal/hr for all runs. Run 1: with injectors attached to their 1/8" lines. #2 &4 jars showed about 40% down in volume compared to the rest. See pictures. The jars a placed as you would see the cylinders from inside the aircraft. Run 2: without injectors. #4 jar now showed similar amount as the good cylinders (indicating #4 injector was partially clogged). However, none went in jar #2. Scratching my head on this one. Run 3: without injectors. Cleaned #2&4 injectors again. Same results as Run 2. Run 4: with injectors. Same results as Run 1. Really scratching my head. Why does fuel goes in jar #2 only when its injector is attached? Run 5: with injectors. Cleaned #2 & 4 lines from the spider to the injectors using 0.25 safety wire, brake cleaner, then compressed air. Results are the same as Run 4 - #2 & 4 are down by 40% compared to the rest. Not sure if you can see in the pictures but jar #5 has slightly less (maybe 5%) fuel than the others consistently. Anh #141 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Quadrant vs. Vernier Cables
Date: Nov 12, 2006
From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com>
A comment was made (I believe from Scott) which went unresponded to. For those few who have not made their decision or are still open to input on the subject of choice. It has been said that the Law of Primacy prevails in aviation. That item first learned by instruction or experience is most often retained. Example, most pilot who learn on High wing prefer High Wing. Those who learn on Low wing prefer low wing. Those who fly with Vernier cables, tend to choose cables for their RV-10. Those who have flown High Performance aircraft (those over 200 hp) with throttle quadrants on turboprop or turbine or multi then tend to chose throttle quadrants. The choice of throttle quadrants allows the competent pilot to control Throttle-Prop-Mixture with multiple digits - Simultaneously. Much like piano playing it is a learned skill. Add Multi-Engine into the mix and the more primitive cables are automatically replaced with a quadrant and the discussion is over. Just food for thought which no one commented on after the valuable observation. John Cox #40600 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steven DiNieri" <capsteve(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Quadrant vs. Vernier Cables
Date: Nov 12, 2006
There was a lister who pointed out the difference in price of the throttle quadrants from vans and aircraft spruce. I=92m ready to pick one up and am also curious as to the quality difference. Anyone have any experience with both from a comparison standpoint??? Steve 40205 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John W. Cox Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 3:34 AM Subject: RV10-List: Quadrant vs. Vernier Cables A comment was made (I believe from Scott) which went unresponded to. For those few who have not made their decision or are still open to input on the subject of choice. It has been said that the Law of Primacy prevails in aviation. That item first learned by instruction or experience is most often retained. Example, most pilot who learn on High wing prefer High Wing. Those who learn on Low wing prefer low wing. Those who fly with Vernier cables, tend to choose cables for their RV-10. Those who have flown High Performance aircraft (those over 200 hp) with throttle quadrants on turboprop or turbine or multi then tend to chose throttle quadrants. The choice of throttle quadrants allows the competent pilot to control Throttle-Prop-Mixture with multiple digits - Simultaneously. Much like piano playing it is a learned skill. Add Multi-Engine into the mix and the more primitive cables are automatically replaced with a quadrant and the discussion is over. Just food for thought which no one commented on after the valuable observation. John Cox #40600 "http://www.aeroelectric.com"www.aeroelectric.com "http://www.buildersbooks.com"www.buildersbooks.com "http://www.kitlog.com"www.kitlog.com "http://www.homebuilthelp.com"www.homebuilthelp.com "http://www.matronics.com/contribution"http://www.matronics.com/contribut ion "http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List"http://www.matronics.com/Na vig ator?RV10-List -- 11/11/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. 11/11/2006 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Quadrant vs. Vernier Cables
Date: Nov 12, 2006
From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com>
Just to benchmark the process. Take a look at the two variants used on Lancair IV and IVPT through Aerocraft Parts & Avionics. http://www.aerocraftparts.com/SearchForm.aspx?Search=Throttle%20Quadran t Then the A/S looks pretty nice. You get what you pay for. Seek "In the Left seat time" with flying RV-10s, cause it is worth the effort. Once you have flown proficiently with a quadrant, the discussion might just be closed. John ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Steven DiNieri Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 12:44 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Quadrant vs. Vernier Cables There was a lister who pointed out the difference in price of the throttle quadrants from vans and aircraft spruce. I'm ready to pick one up and am also curious as to the quality difference. Anyone have any experience with both from a comparison standpoint??? Steve 40205 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John W. Cox Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 3:34 AM Subject: RV10-List: Quadrant vs. Vernier Cables A comment was made (I believe from Scott) which went unresponded to. For those few who have not made their decision or are still open to input on the subject of choice. It has been said that the Law of Primacy prevails in aviation. That item first learned by instruction or experience is most often retained. Example, most pilot who learn on High wing prefer High Wing. Those who learn on Low wing prefer low wing. Those who fly with Vernier cables, tend to choose cables for their RV-10. Those who have flown High Performance aircraft (those over 200 hp) with throttle quadrants on turboprop or turbine or multi then tend to chose throttle quadrants. The choice of throttle quadrants allows the competent pilot to control Throttle-Prop-Mixture with multiple digits - Simultaneously. Much like piano playing it is a learned skill. Add Multi-Engine into the mix and the more primitive cables are automatically replaced with a quadrant and the discussion is over. Just food for thought which no one commented on after the valuable observation. John Cox ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jesse Saint" <jesse(at)itecusa.org>
Subject: Engine trouble shoots-High #2 & #4 EGTs -Update
Date: Nov 12, 2006
Something that comes to my mind is the possibility of some crud in the lines, possibly up in the spider. It could be a tiny piece of proseal or something like that which is too big to get through the line, but is small enough to be moved around, so sometimes more fuel gets through than other times. We found a piece of proseal (or something like that) in the injector on #5 on N256H within the first 50 hours or so, causing it to run rough, although much cooler, since very little fuel was getting to it. It did not do this all the time, but would be in flight and then the CHT and EGT on #5 would both drop drastically. In fact, I think we saw this on the way to OSH=9205. This would not explain anything with your #2 line only getting fuel through when the injector is attached. I would try that test again a few times and make absolutely sure that you can duplicate that symptom, as it sure doesn=92t seem to make sense, as you pointed out. Can you remind us where you got your engine? New or Used? Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. HYPERLINK "mailto:jesse(at)itecusa.org"jesse(at)itecusa.org HYPERLINK "http://www.itecusa.org"www.itecusa.org W: 352-465-4545 C: 352-427-0285 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of DejaVu Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 8:15 PM Subject: RV10-List: Engine trouble shoots-High #2 & #4 EGTs -Update I ran my engine yesterday continuing to troubleshoot the high EGTs (~1500deg) on #2 & #4. I'm starting to think my spider is not performing consistently. Below is the summary. Swapped EGT probes. Problem did not follow the probes - sensors appear ok. CHT's consistently around 40deg higher for these cylinders. Noted exhaust discoloration on 2 & 4. No doubt these were running hotter than the rest. Swapped #1 and #4 injectors. #1 EGT (which now has #4 injector) was normal, leading me to believe #4 injector was fine. #4 EGT (which now has #1 injector) is still hot. Checked Slicks timing. All ok. In talking to David McNeill on the phone he gave me a few ideas to go after, which I did today: Fuel flow tested using 6 baby food jars in five "runs". Boost pump turned on for about 20 seconds. Indicated (EIS6000) fuel pressure around 23psi, fuel flow around 3.7gal/hr for all runs. Run 1: with injectors attached to their 1/8" lines. #2 &4 jars showed about 40% down in volume compared to the rest. See pictures. The jars a placed as you would see the cylinders from inside the aircraft. Run 2: without injectors. #4 jar now showed similar amount as the good cylinders (indicating #4 injector was partially clogged). However, none went in jar #2. Scratching my head on this one. Run 3: without injectors. Cleaned #2&4 injectors again. Same results as Run 2. Run 4: with injectors. Same results as Run 1. Really scratching my head. Why does fuel goes in jar #2 only when its injector is attached? Run 5: with injectors. Cleaned #2 & 4 lines from the spider to the injectors using 0.25 safety wire, brake cleaner, then compressed air. Results are the same as Run 4 - #2 & 4 are down by 40% compared to the rest. Not sure if you can see in the pictures but jar #5 has slightly less (maybe 5%) fuel than the others consistently. Anh #141 -- 11/11/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. 11/11/2006 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 12, 2006
From: "Kelly McMullen" <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Quadrant vs. Vernier Cables
For balance, I'll give you the other side. I'm multi rated, have flown both twins, where, as you say, there is no argument, and Mooneys with both quadrant and pushpull. With the Mooney there is no question, the push pull is better. I recently flew one with a friend checking out an engine analyzer. It simply wasn't possible to make mixture adjustments to finer than 2-3 tenths gph, making achieving a desired 20 LOP for that particular flight very difficult to achieve. I've observed the same issue on twins for both mixture and trying to sync the props...it takes effort and concentration. Perhaps you get better at inducing minute changes with more hours...you are right about primacy, and I have probably 15 times more time in planes with push pull than quadrant, but my time in quadrant planes isn't all that small either. The nicety of being able to operate all three levers(or more) at once simply isn't needed on a single engine. The prop is rarely changed, perhaps 2-3 times per flight. The mixture needs to be finely adjusted for cruise and then mostly left alone. The throttle is the only control you will change more frequently. Then there is the maintenance side. Push pull is easier to install, adjust and maintain. Just the other side of the coin. Don't expect to change anyone's mind. On 11/12/06, John W. Cox wrote: > > > A comment was made (I believe from Scott) which went unresponded to. For > those few who have not made their decision or are still open to input on the > subject of choice. It has been said that the Law of Primacy prevails in > aviation. That item first learned by instruction or experience is most > often retained. Example, most pilot who learn on High wing prefer High > Wing. Those who learn on Low wing prefer low wing. Those who fly with > Vernier cables, tend to choose cables for their RV-10. Those who have flown > High Performance aircraft (those over 200 hp) with throttle quadrants on > turboprop or turbine or multi then tend to chose throttle quadrants. > > > The choice of throttle quadrants allows the competent pilot to control > Throttle-Prop-Mixture with multiple digits - Simultaneously. Much like > piano playing it is a learned skill. Add Multi-Engine into the mix and the > more primitive cables are automatically replaced with a quadrant and the > discussion is over. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 12, 2006
From: Ed <ed(at)muellerartcover.com>
Subject: Re: Quadrant vs. Vernier Cables
Kelly, Next time you want to make fine adjustments on a quadrant, try this (if I can explain it): get the mixture close to the proper setting then pull the lever towards you (rearward) slightly. Place your thumb on the faceplate sideways across the slot and against the stem of the lever. Holding your thumb solid against the faceplate, roll (don't push keep your thumb keep it stationary on the faceplate) your thumb forward, it will move the lever in very small increments. I personally like the quadrant. Ed Mueller #40525 Kelly McMullen wrote: > > For balance, I'll give you the other side. I'm multi rated, have flown > both twins, where, as you say, there is no argument, and Mooneys with > both quadrant and pushpull. With the Mooney there is no question, the > push pull is better. I recently flew one with a friend checking out an > engine analyzer. It simply wasn't possible to make mixture adjustments > to finer than 2-3 tenths gph, making achieving a desired 20 LOP for > that particular flight very difficult to achieve. I've observed the > same issue on twins for both mixture and trying to sync the props...it > takes effort and concentration. Perhaps you get better at inducing > minute changes with more hours...you are right about primacy, and I > have probably 15 times more time in planes with push pull than > quadrant, but my time in quadrant planes isn't all that small either. > The nicety of being able to operate all three levers(or more) at once > simply isn't needed on a single engine. The prop is rarely changed, > perhaps 2-3 times per flight. The mixture needs to be finely adjusted > for cruise and then mostly left alone. > The throttle is the only control you will change more frequently. > Then there is the maintenance side. Push pull is easier to install, > adjust and maintain. > Just the other side of the coin. Don't expect to change anyone's mind. > > On 11/12/06, John W. Cox wrote: >> >> >> >> A comment was made (I believe from Scott) which went unresponded to. >> For >> those few who have not made their decision or are still open to input >> on the >> subject of choice. It has been said that the Law of Primacy prevails in >> aviation. That item first learned by instruction or experience is most >> often retained. Example, most pilot who learn on High wing prefer High >> Wing. Those who learn on Low wing prefer low wing. Those who fly with >> Vernier cables, tend to choose cables for their RV-10. Those who >> have flown >> High Performance aircraft (those over 200 hp) with throttle quadrants on >> turboprop or turbine or multi then tend to chose throttle quadrants. >> >> >> >> The choice of throttle quadrants allows the competent pilot to control >> Throttle-Prop-Mixture with multiple digits - Simultaneously. Much like >> piano playing it is a learned skill. Add Multi-Engine into the mix >> and the >> more primitive cables are automatically replaced with a quadrant and the >> discussion is over. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ddddsp1(at)juno.com" <ddddsp1(at)juno.com>
Date: Nov 12, 2006
Subject: Re: Quadrant vs. Vernier Cables
Kelly, Your thoughts are great for those considering which option to go with. Like most other decisions we make while building they need to FIT your n eeds...........not your friends who you are trying to impress. The bott om line on these equipment choices is that "most" of the time both optio ns will fly the plane well. For newbies though it is nice to get differ ent perspectives as they may not know the questions to ask at that stage of the build. I know I am MUCH smarter now than 6 months ago largely d ue to posts and opinions on this list that made me consider other option s than my own. However, at the end of the day I make the choice on the equipment that fits my needs........quality, cost, type of flying, ergon omics, etc. I went vernier because I like an OPEN, SPACIOUS cabin. Q uadrants look cool but take up space albiet not much but appear to intru de into the cabin from the panel. Call me old fashion but I like a flat panel........contours are ok as long as it doesn't take away from my ca bin space. LOL If I could change the plans I would even eliminate the stick between my legs and go to the side joystick like Cirrus or Columb ia to give me more cabin "comfort" space. Anyway, for all the newbies.. ..don't discard the vernier controls just because you read a POST statin g how great a pilot loves his/her quadrant. Do what you want and what w ill meet your needs....looks only count on the ground. Just my 2 cents worth. Dean 40449 ________________________________________________________________________

Kelly,

Your thoughts are great for those considering which option to go with .  Like most other decisions we make while building they need to FI T your needs...........not your friends who you are trying to impress.&n bsp; The bottom line on these equipment choices is that "most" of the ti me both options will fly the plane well.  For newbies though it is nice to get different perspectives as they may not know the questions to ask at that stage of the build.  I know I am MUCH smarter now than 6 months ago largely due to posts and opinions on this list that made m e consider other options than my own.  However, at the end of the d ay I make the choice on the equipment that fits my needs........quality, cost, type of flying, ergonomics, etc.    I went vernier because I like an OPEN, SPACIOUS cabin.  Quadrants look cool but t ake up space albiet not much but appear to intrude into the cabin from t he panel.  Call me old fashion but I like a flat panel........conto urs are ok as long as it doesn't take away from my cabin space.  LO L   If I could change the plans I would even eliminate the sti ck between my legs and go to the side joystick like Cirrus or Columbia t o give me more cabin "comfort" space.  Anyway, for all the newbies. ...don't discard the vernier controls just because you read a POST stati ng how great a pilot loves his/her quadrant.  Do what you want and what will meet your needs....looks only count on the ground.

Just my 2 cents worth.

Dean 40449



______________________ __________________________________________________
Visit http://www.juno.com/value to sign up today!

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Robert Woods" <rwshooter(at)cox.net>
Subject: new -10 builder
Date: Nov 12, 2006
Hey all, After much debate and decision making with my wife and daughter, traveling around flying non-rv demos and yes a TON OF LURKING ,as Tim Olsen so put it, on this matronics stuff.....I'm building an RV-10. The final decision was made yesterday at the AOPA convention when I finally got to see one in person. I went there with the hope to fly a demo, but it wasn't available......but I got to see it, touch it and make a few "very quiet" airplane noises....not one for too much embarrassment......and then I noticed a grin to the left of my mouth....I'm hooked!.....I've known for about 6 months I was going to "build" our new plane so we bought an acre at Sky Ranch Estates (3L2), 20 minutes south of Las Vegas, four months ago and are about to start building our hangar and a new home. Yep, we are going to move there, build and live with our new -10......maybe even another RV later, and have a private runway to boot! This whole matronics list......most of witch I don't understand but I'll get it.....played a huge part in this decision....especially Tim's "commitment" statement......Thanks Tim!!.........Truly looking forward to this site for help from some fine people and offer any help I can give. I'm ordering the QB kit about Christmas time and should start building about feb or mar if all goes well with the hangar build. Now for my first question: Does anyone know the name of a school that offers an empennage building class?.......I stumbled on it one day while LURKING and never found it again Thanks Robert Woods N113RL.....about to send it in for reservation......my daughters birthday and first 2 initials ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steven DiNieri" <capsteve(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Electric Rudder Trim ala Vic Syracuse
Date: Nov 12, 2006
Thanks for all the input. It seems fairly unanimous that some form of rudder trim is preferred. Technically there's going to be two ways to make it happen. Bias spring/servo type on the pedals under dash somewhere or servo/tab in the rudder. I'll probably spend most of today scratching my head trying to find an elegant (read: simple) way to keep it under dash. Choice 2 would be to cut a tab into the trailing edge of the rudder. I'm not quite happy about hanging a hinge off the trailing edge. A couple of thoughts on the servo.....i do have an extra mac servo, but I might compare the torque to a large scale servo from the rc world. The servo would be lighter and the pwm operation would allow slide type control. A indicator wouldn't be necessary as the slide would reflect tab position - left on the slide is left trim, center slide is neutral trim......... I'll report on how badly I've mangled the rudder later......:) Steve 40205 > > I don't know of any RV-10's flying that don't either have a rudder > tab wedge in place, or electric rudder trim. (I'm sure there's one > somewhere though, but none that I know of....but they would probably > not be flying perfectly straight) I myself have a wedge taped on. > It looks fine, and works ok in cruise at lower power settings. > The problem is, even adding 5-10kts is significant enough to make > the wedge too much trim, and flying at lower speeds makes it too > little. > > I didn't have any believe in rudder trim when I started. My > previous plane didn't have it, and I didn't care. But as both my > aircraft quality, and flying quality has improved with the RV-10, > I now see it as a much more necessary item if you're going for a > truly nice flying airplane. I wish I would have done it earlier, > because it's harder to do after you've painted. > > As far as your antenna in the rudder, I would most certainly > avoid that, from a balance standpoint, a wiring standpoint, and > more. Even when doing the rudder trim, the builders who've > checked with Van's had them recommend that the servo be mounted > forward enough to balance the trim control on the aft side. I > really think putting an antenna there is a bad idea...especially > given the abundance of GOOD locations for the antenna. > > Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying > > > > Steven DiNieri wrote: > > Just how necessary is this mod?? Has anyone flying their 10 had to put a > > wedge on the rudder to correct for an out of trim condition? I think > > its a great idea just need to make sure its needed. > > > > > > > > Thinking about rudders. Im seriously considering mounting the nav/gs > > antenna in the rudder. I cant find a certified example with an external > > antenna in a control surface, Im not sure if thats on purpose. Im > > thinking that the rudder is fairly stationary in cruise and approach. So > > there shouldnt be a problem.. > > > > Steve > > > > 40205 > > > > > > > > *Subject:* RV10-List: Electric Rudder Trim ala Vic Syracuse > > > > > I have decided to add electric rudder trim before I complete the rudder. > > The theory being that it will be infinitely easier to do this before the > > rudder is completed. That being said, I want to shamelessly copy Vics > > design as documented on Tim Olsons website (see > > http://myrv10.com/tips/mods/RudderTrim/index.html). > > > > > > > > The pictures are quire revealing (pun intended)! I see that the access > > panel is has a Ray Allen T2-7A servo and that the access panel sits on a > > flange that was riveted to the rudder skin. What I dont have are the > > dimensions of the access panel as well as its location on the rudder. I > > can guess but would prefer something a bit more accurate if available. > > Failing that, is the T2-7a servo dimensionally the same size as the > > T3-12A servo that came with the tail kit? If so, I can estimate the > > access panel size. > > > > > > Les Kearney > > > > RV10 # 40643 - Vertical Stab > > > > > > > > > > -- > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: jdalton77(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: new -10 builder
Date: Nov 12, 2006
Robert, Welcome and congratulations! One of the main factors in my decision was the "user group" of builders. They all have differing opinions - some are conservative builders ("don't use auto paint, your plane will crash") and some not ("check out this jet mod i installed under each wing") so there is plenty of perspective. My advice? Have fun and get your friends and family involved. I put a cooler in the shop and when it's filled with drinks and snacks I get all kinds of visitors wanting to help. Good luck! Jeff Dalton Tail kit done, ordering wings -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Robert Woods" <rwshooter(at)cox.net> Hey all, After much debate and decision making with my wife and daughter, traveling around flying non-rv demos and yes a TON OF LURKING ,as Tim Olsen so put it, on this matronics stuff.....I'm building an RV-10. The final decision was made yesterday at the AOPA convention when I finally got to see one in person. I went there with the hope to fly a demo, but it wasn't available......but I got to see it, touch it and make a few "very quiet" airplane noises....not one for too much embarrassment......and then I noticed a grin to the left of my mouth....I'm hooked!.....I've known for about 6 months I was going to "build" our new plane so we bought an acre at Sky Ranch Estates (3L2), 20 minutes south of Las Vegas, four months ago and are about to start building our hangar and a new home. Yep, we are going to move there, build and live with our new -10......maybe even another RV later, and have a private runway to boot! This whole matronics list......most of witch I don't understand but I 'll get it.....played a huge part in this decision....especially Tim's "commitment" statement......Thanks Tim!!.........Truly looking forward to this site for help from some fine people and offer any help I can give. I'm ordering the QB kit about Christmas time and should start building about feb or mar if all goes well with the hangar build. Now for my first question: Does anyone know the name of a school that offers an empennage building class?.......I stumbled on it one day while LURKING and never found it again Thanks Robert Woods N113RL.....about to send it in for reservation......my daughters birthday and first 2 initials
Robert,
 
Welcome and congratulations!  One of the main factors in my decision was the "user group" of builders.  They all have differing opinions - some are conservative builders ("don't use auto paint, your plane will crash") and some not ("check out this jet mod i installed under each wing") so there is plenty of perspective.
 
My advice?  Have fun and get your friends and family involved.  I put a cooler in the shop and when it's filled with drinks and snacks I get all kinds of visitors wanting to help.
 
Good luck!
 
Jeff Dalton
Tail kit done, ordering wings
 
Hey all,
 
  After much debate and decision making with my wife and daughter, traveling around flying non-rv demos and yes a TON OF LURKING ,as Tim Olsen so put it, on this matronics stuff.....I'm building an RV-10.  The final decision was made yesterday at the AOPA convention when I finally got to see one in person.  I  went there with  the hope to fly a demo, but it wasn't available......but I got to see it, touch it and make a few "very quiet" airplane noises....not one for too much embarrassment......and then I noticed a grin to the left of my mouth....I'm hooked!.....I've known for about 6 months I was going to "build" our new plane so we bought an acre at Sky Ranch Estates (3L2), 20 minutes south of Las Vegas, four months ago and are about to start building our hangar and a new home.  Yep,  we are going to move there, build and live with our new -10......maybe even another RV later, and have a  ;priva te runway to boot!  This whole matronics list......most of witch I don't understand but I'll get it.....played a huge part in this decision....especially Tim's "commitment" statement......Thanks Tim!!.........Truly looking forward to this site for help from some fine people and offer any help I can give.  I'm ordering the QB kit about Christmas time and should start building about feb or mar if all goes well with the hangar build.  Now for my first question:  Does anyone know the name of a school that offers an empennage building class?.......I stumbled on it one day while LURKING and never found it again
 
Thanks
Robert Woods
N113RL.....about to send it in for reservation......my daughters birthday and first 2 initials

      
      
      

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: jdalton77(at)comcast.net
Subject: Long shot - Anyone have a slo-built wing kit for sale?
Date: Nov 12, 2006
I know this is a long-shot but I've seen a couple of folks over the last year selling sub-kits because they've either changed their mind, or wanted to change form slow-build to quick-build. I'm done with my tailkit and am ready to order my wings from Vans. Before I do, does anyone know of a slow-build wing kit for sale? Jeff jdalton77(at)comcast.net
I know this is a long-shot but I've seen a couple of folks over the last year selling sub-kits because they've either changed their mind, or wanted to change form slow-build to quick-build.
 
I'm done with my tailkit and am ready to order my wings from Vans.  Before I do, does anyone know of a slow-build wing kit for sale?
 
Jeff
jdalton77(at)comcast.net

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steven DiNieri" <capsteve(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Electric Rudder Trim ala Vic Syracuse
Date: Nov 12, 2006
Well, deep down I knew it was a bad idea. Thinking about it, if the antenna elements vibrated during flight (and I'm sure they do) they could contribute to flutter. So, I've decided to install the nav/gs antenna in the vertical stabilizer around the top hinge. I've yet to install the upper hinge doubler in the service bulletin, so when I'm in there Ill add a bracket. None of the other placements make as much sense to me. I think keeping it as far from the fuse as possible can't hurt, plus I have a few rugrats running around the hangar and keeping the eye poking devices to a minimum is important........ Steve 40205 > I would have to agree with Tim that putting antennas in the rudder might >be a mistake. Not only with balance issues but also because of the wire >wearing as the rudder moves. While it may remain fairly stationary in >flight, it certainly moves a LOT while on the ground taxiing. I dont even >like having the wires to the tail lights back there, but that is hard to >avoid >Jesse Saint >I-TEC, Inc. >jesse(at)itecusa.org > > As far as your antenna in the rudder, I would most certainly > avoid that, from a balance standpoint, a wiring standpoint, and > more. Even when doing the rudder trim, the builders who've > checked with Van's had them recommend that the servo be mounted > forward enough to balance the trim control on the aft side. I > really think putting an antenna there is a bad idea...especially > given the abundance of GOOD locations for the antenna. > > Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying > > > > Steven DiNieri wrote: > > Just how necessary is this mod?? Has anyone flying their 10 had to put a > > wedge on the rudder to correct for an out of trim condition? I think > > its a great idea just need to make sure its needed. > > > > > > > > Thinking about rudders. Im seriously considering mounting the nav/gs > > antenna in the rudder. I cant find a certified example with an external > > antenna in a control surface, Im not sure if thats on purpose. Im > > thinking that the rudder is fairly stationary in cruise and approach. So > > there shouldnt be a problem.. > > > > Steve > > > > 40205 > > > > > > > > *Subject:* RV10-List: Electric Rudder Trim ala Vic Syracuse > > > > > I have decided to add electric rudder trim before I complete the rudder. > > The theory being that it will be infinitely easier to do this before the > > rudder is completed. That being said, I want to shamelessly copy Vics > > design as documented on Tim Olsons website (see > > http://myrv10.com/tips/mods/RudderTrim/index.html). > > > > > > > > The pictures are quire revealing (pun intended)! I see that the access > > panel is has a Ray Allen T2-7A servo and that the access panel sits on a > > flange that was riveted to the rudder skin. What I dont have are the > > dimensions of the access panel as well as its location on the rudder. I > > can guess but would prefer something a bit more accurate if available. > > Failing that, is the T2-7a servo dimensionally the same size as the > > T3-12A servo that came with the tail kit? If so, I can estimate the > > access panel size. > > > > > > Les Kearney > > > > RV10 # 40643 - Vertical Stab > > > > > > > > > > -- > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: new -10 builder
Date: Nov 12, 2006
From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com>
Congrats: Synergy in Eugene is the closest. Alexander's in Georgia is the most prolific. They are all over the place. Van's can direct you to a close location. John Cox ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robert Woods Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 9:07 AM Subject: RV10-List: new -10 builder Hey all, After much debate and decision making with my wife and daughter, traveling around flying non-rv demos and yes a TON OF LURKING ,as Tim Olsen so put it, on this matronics stuff.....I'm building an RV-10. The final decision was made yesterday at the AOPA convention when I finally got to see one in person. I went there with the hope to fly a demo, but it wasn't available......but I got to see it, touch it and make a few "very quiet" airplane noises....not one for too much embarrassment......and then I noticed a grin to the left of my mouth....I'm hooked!.....I've known for about 6 months I was going to "build" our new plane so we bought an acre at Sky Ranch Estates (3L2), 20 minutes south of Las Vegas, four months ago and are about to start building our hangar and a new home. Yep, we are going to move there, build and live with our new -10......maybe even another RV later, and have a private runway to boot! This whole matronics list......most of witch I don't understand but I'll get it.....played a huge part in this decision....especially Tim's "commitment" statement......Thanks Tim!!.........Truly looking forward to this site for help from some fine people and offer any help I can give. I'm ordering the QB kit about Christmas time and should start building about feb or mar if all goes well with the hangar build. Now for my first question: Does anyone know the name of a school that offers an empennage building class?.......I stumbled on it one day while LURKING and never found it again Thanks Robert Woods N113RL.....about to send it in for reservation......my daughters birthday and first 2 initials ________________________________________________________________________________
From: David Maib <dmaib(at)mac.com>
Subject: Re: new -10 builder
Date: Nov 12, 2006
Two schools that I know of are SynergyAir in Eugene, OR and Alexander Technical Center in Griffin, GA. My wife and I attended the SynergyAir class and were extremely pleased. I have heard only good reports about Alexander Tech Center as well. I think there are others out there as well. It was money well spent for two very inexperienced builders. We left with a lot of knowledge, some self-confidence, and completed HS, VS, rudder, elevators, and trim tabs. David Maib 40559 tailcone On Nov 12, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Robert Woods wrote: Hey all, After much debate and decision making with my wife and daughter, traveling around flying non-rv demos and yes a TON OF LURKING ,as Tim Olsen so put it, on this matronics stuff.....I'm building an RV-10. The final decision was made yesterday at the AOPA convention when I finally got to see one in person. I went there with the hope to fly a demo, but it wasn't available......but I got to see it, touch it and make a few "very quiet" airplane noises....not one for too much embarrassment......and then I noticed a grin to the left of my mouth....I'm hooked!.....I've known for about 6 months I was going to "build" our new plane so we bought an acre at Sky Ranch Estates (3L2), 20 minutes south of Las Vegas, four months ago and are about to start building our hangar and a new home. Yep, we are going to move there, build and live with our new -10......maybe even another RV later, and have a private runway to boot! This whole matronics list......most of witch I don't understand but I'll get it.....played a huge part in this decision....especially Tim's "commitment" statement......Thanks Tim!!.........Truly looking forward to this site for help from some fine people and offer any help I can give. I'm ordering the QB kit about Christmas time and should start building about feb or mar if all goes well with the hangar build. Now for my first question: Does anyone know the name of a school that offers an empennage building class?.......I stumbled on it one day while LURKING and never found it again Thanks Robert Woods N113RL.....about to send it in for reservation......my daughters birthday and first 2 initials ============================================================ _- www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List_- =========================================================== ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "bob.kaufmann" <bob.kaufmann(at)cox.net>
Subject: new -10 builder
Date: Nov 12, 2006
Dave There are 4 RV-10s in Las Vegas, Mine, Rick S, Droopy and Chris's. All in different stages of construction. Come see them all. After going to a school, I made the choice. I went to the one in Corona. I am giving a toolbox school next weekend to a friend, if you want to, order one and come on by. You can email me off the list at bob.kaufmann(at)cox.net. You will be attached at the hip to Tim's site, bookmark it and go there often. He is also a great guy. Bob K Wiring and catch up stuff. 702 767-3587 cell _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of David Maib Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 9:34 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: new -10 builder Two schools that I know of are SynergyAir in Eugene, OR and Alexander Technical Center in Griffin, GA. My wife and I attended the SynergyAir class and were extremely pleased. I have heard only good reports about Alexander Tech Center as well. I think there are others out there as well. It was money well spent for two very inexperienced builders. We left with a lot of knowledge, some self-confidence, and completed HS, VS, rudder, elevators, and trim tabs. David Maib 40559 tailcone On Nov 12, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Robert Woods wrote: Hey all, After much debate and decision making with my wife and daughter, traveling around flying non-rv demos and yes a TON OF LURKING ,as Tim Olsen so put it, on this matronics stuff.....I'm building an RV-10. The final decision was made yesterday at the AOPA convention when I finally got to see one in person. I went there with the hope to fly a demo, but it wasn't available......but I got to see it, touch it and make a few "very quiet" airplane noises....not one for too much embarrassment......and then I noticed a grin to the left of my mouth....I'm hooked!.....I've known for about 6 months I was going to "build" our new plane so we bought an acre at Sky Ranch Estates (3L2), 20 minutes south of Las Vegas, four months ago and are about to start building our hangar and a new home. Yep, we are going to move there, build and live with our new -10......maybe even another RV later, and have a private runway to boot! This whole matronics list......most of witch I don't understand but I'll get it.....played a huge part in this decision....especially Tim's "commitment" statement......Thanks Tim!!.........Truly looking forward to this site for help from some fine people and offer any help I can give. I'm ordering the QB kit about Christmas time and should start building about feb or mar if all goes well with the hangar build. Now for my first question: Does anyone know the name of a school that offers an empennage building class?.......I stumbled on it one day while LURKING and never found it again Thanks Robert Woods N113RL.....about to send it in for reservation......my daughters birthday and first 2 initials * The Builder's Bookstore <http://www.buildersbooks.com> www.buildersbooks.com * HomebuiltHELP <http://www.homebuilthelp.com> www.homebuilthelp.com Thank you for your generous class="Apple-converted-space"> - The RV10-List Email Forum - class="Apple-converted-space"> --> <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Jessen" <jjessen(at)rcn.com>
Subject: new -10 builder
Date: Nov 12, 2006
Welcome, Robert! It sounds as if you and your family will be building a whole bunch for the next few cycles of time! Enjoy the journey. John Jessen #40328 When you get your builder number, let us know what it is so we know how many kits have been sold. Thanks. _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robert Woods Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 9:07 AM Subject: RV10-List: new -10 builder Hey all, After much debate and decision making with my wife and daughter, traveling around flying non-rv demos and yes a TON OF LURKING ,as Tim Olsen so put it, on this matronics stuff.....I'm building an RV-10. The final decision was made yesterday at the AOPA convention when I finally got to see one in person. I went there with the hope to fly a demo, but it wasn't available......but I got to see it, touch it and make a few "very quiet" airplane noises....not one for too much embarrassment......and then I noticed a grin to the left of my mouth....I'm hooked!.....I've known for about 6 months I was going to "build" our new plane so we bought an acre at Sky Ranch Estates (3L2), 20 minutes south of Las Vegas, four months ago and are about to start building our hangar and a new home. Yep, we are going to move there, build and live with our new -10......maybe even another RV later, and have a private runway to boot! This whole matronics list......most of witch I don't understand but I'll get it.....played a huge part in this decision....especially Tim's "commitment" statement......Thanks Tim!!.........Truly looking forward to this site for help from some fine people and offer any help I can give. I'm ordering the QB kit about Christmas time and should start building about feb or mar if all goes well with the hangar build. Now for my first question: Does anyone know the name of a school that offers an empennage building class?.......I stumbled on it one day while LURKING and never found it again Thanks Robert Woods N113RL.....about to send it in for reservation......my daughters birthday and first 2 initials "http://www.aeroelectric.com"www.aeroelectric.com "http://www.buildersbooks.com"www.buildersbooks.com "http://www.kitlog.com"www.kitlog.com "http://www.homebuilthelp.com"www.homebuilthelp.com "http://www.matronics.com/contribution"http://www.matronics.com/contribution "http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List"http://www.matronics.com/Navig ator?RV10-List -- No virus found in this outgoing message. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Ritter" <mritter509(at)msn.com>
Subject: new -10 builder
Date: Nov 12, 2006
Robert, I didn't know a thing about building an RV-10 when I started three years ago. To get started I did a three day builders course with George Orndorff and that got me off and running. I then had the fun of building the empennage in my hangar on my schedule. The epennage plans are great and easy to follow even for a left handed CPA. Mark (N410MR Flying) >From: "Robert Woods" <rwshooter(at)cox.net> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: RV10-List: new -10 builder >Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 09:07:07 -0800 > >Hey all, > > After much debate and decision making with my wife and daughter, >traveling around flying non-rv demos and yes a TON OF LURKING ,as Tim Olsen >so put it, on this matronics stuff.....I'm building an RV-10. The final >decision was made yesterday at the AOPA convention when I finally got to >see one in person. I went there with the hope to fly a demo, but it >wasn't available......but I got to see it, touch it and make a few "very >quiet" airplane noises....not one for too much embarrassment......and then >I noticed a grin to the left of my mouth....I'm hooked!.....I've known for >about 6 months I was going to "build" our new plane so we bought an acre at >Sky Ranch Estates (3L2), 20 minutes south of Las Vegas, four months ago and >are about to start building our hangar and a new home. Yep, we are going >to move there, build and live with our new -10......maybe even another RV >later, and have a private runway to boot! This whole matronics >list......most of witch I don't understand but I'll get it.....played a >huge part in this decision....especially Tim's "commitment" >statement......Thanks Tim!!.........Truly looking forward to this site for >help from some fine people and offer any help I can give. I'm ordering the >QB kit about Christmas time and should start building about feb or mar if >all goes well with the hangar build. Now for my first question: Does >anyone know the name of a school that offers an empennage building >class?.......I stumbled on it one day while LURKING and never found it >again > >Thanks >Robert Woods >N113RL.....about to send it in for reservation......my daughters birthday >and first 2 initials _________________________________________________________________ Find a local pizza place, music store, museum and morethen map the best route! http://local.live.com?FORM=MGA001 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Ritter" <mritter509(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Quadrant vs. Vernier Cables
Date: Nov 12, 2006
I've had a quadrant in a Piper Lance and vernier in a Bonanza. Went with the vernier cables in my RV-10 and find them very precise and easy to use. Mark (N410MR Flying) >From: "ddddsp1(at)juno.com" <ddddsp1(at)juno.com> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV10-List: Quadrant vs. Vernier Cables >Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:00:18 GMT > >Kelly, >Your thoughts are great for those considering which option to go with. >Like most other decisions we make while building they need to FIT your >needs...........not your friends who you are trying to impress. The bottom >line on these equipment choices is that "most" of the time both options >will fly the plane well. For newbies though it is nice to get different >perspectives as they may not know the questions to ask at that stage of the >build. I know I am MUCH smarter now than 6 months ago largely due to posts >and opinions on this list that made me consider other options than my own. >However, at the end of the day I make the choice on the equipment that fits >my needs........quality, cost, type of flying, ergonomics, etc. I went >vernier because I like an OPEN, SPACIOUS cabin. Quadrants look cool but >take up space albiet not much but appear to intrude into the cabin from the >panel. Call me old fashion but I like a flat panel........contours are ok >as long as it doesn't take away from my cabin space. LOL If I could >change the plans I would even eliminate the stick between my legs and go to >the side joystick like Cirrus or Columbia to give me more cabin "comfort" >space. Anyway, for all the newbies....don't discard the vernier controls >just because you read a POST stating how great a pilot loves his/her >quadrant. Do what you want and what will meet your needs....looks only >count on the ground. >Just my 2 cents worth. >Dean 40449 > > >________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ Try the next generation of search with Windows Live Search today! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rob Hunter" <rwhunter(at)integra.net>
Subject: Long shot - Anyone have a slo-built wing kit for sale?
Date: Nov 12, 2006
I have a Slow Build wing kit that has not been touched, other than the parts inventoried. I may have to go quick build because of a decrease in the time I have available to build. I'm wondering if someone would want to buy said wing kit if it were available for 2005 pricing and free shipping. John Jessen Rob Hunter -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of jdalton77(at)comcast.net Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 11:12 AM Subject: RV10-List: Long shot - Anyone have a slo-built wing kit for sale? I know this is a long-shot but I've seen a couple of folks over the last year selling sub-kits because they've either changed their mind, or wanted to change form slow-build to quick-build. I'm done with my tailkit and am ready to order my wings from Vans. Before I do, does anyone know of a slow-build wing kit for sale? Jeff jdalton77(at)comcast.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ddddsp1(at)juno.com" <ddddsp1(at)juno.com>
Date: Nov 12, 2006
Subject: Re: Quadrant vs. Vernier Cables
Tim & Kevin, Take a look at the pic attached. I believe this may fix the problem w ith the venier cables on Vans RV 10. With the much wider panel in the R V 10 the panel flexes and the controls are not as stiff and accurate. I put this on to strengthen the lower panel in the middle where the contr ol are. All but eliminates the flex when you push and pull on the contr ols. Just a thought, DEAN 40449 ________________________________________________________________________

Tim & Kevin,

  Take a look at the pic attached.  I believe this may fix the problem with the venier cables on Vans RV 10.  With the much wi der panel in the RV 10 the panel flexes and the controls are not as stif f and accurate.  I put this on to strengthen the lower panel in the middle where the control are.  All but eliminates the flex when yo u push and pull on the controls.

Just a thought,

DEAN 40449



______________________ __________________________________________________
Visit http://www.juno.com/value to sign up today!
/9j/4SdKRXhpZgAATU0AKgAAAAgACwEPAAIAAAAJAAAAkgEQAAIAAAAPAAAAnAESAAMAAAABAAEA AAEaAAUAAAABAAAArAEbAAUAAAABAAAAtAEoAAMAAAABAAIAAAExAAIAAAAmAAAAvAEyAAIAAAAU AAAA4gITAAMAAAABAAIAAIKYAAIAAAAFAAAA9odpAAQAAAABAAAA/AAABG5GVUpJRklMTQAARmlu ZVBpeCBBMjA1ICAAAAAAAEgAAAABAAAASAAAAAFEaWdpdGFsIENhbWVyYSBGaW5lUGl4IEEyMDUg ICBWZXIxLjAwADIwMDM6MDI6MDYgMDE6NDg6NDYAICAgIAAAACSCmgAFAAAAAQAAArKCnQAFAAAA AQAAArqIIgADAAAAAQACAACIJwADAAAAAQBkAACQAAAHAAAABDAyMjCQAwACAAAAFAAAAsKQBAAC AAAAFAAAAtaRAQAHAAAABAECAwCRAgAFAAAAAQAAAuqSAQAKAAAAAQAAAvKSAgAFAAAAAQAAAvqS AwAKAAAAAQAAAwKSBAAKAAAAAQAAAwqSBQAFAAAAAQAAAxKSBwADAAAAAQAFAACSCAADAAAAAQAA AACSCQADAAAAAQAZAACSCgAFAAAAAQAAAxqSfAAHAAABHgAAAzKgAAAHAAAABDAxMDCgAQADAAAA AQABAACgAgAEAAAAAQAABQCgAwAEAAAAAQAAA8CgBQAEAAAAAQAABFCiDgAFAAAAAQAAAyKiDwAF AAAAAQAAAyqiEAADAAAAAQADAACiFwADAAAAAQACAACjAAAHAAAAAQMAAACjAQAHAAAAAQEAAACk AQADAAAAAQAAAACkAgADAAAAAQAAAACkAwADAAAAAQAAAACkBgADAAAAAQAAAACkCgADAAAAAQAA AACkDAADAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAAAAAACgAAAlgAAAEsAAAAZDIwMDM6MDI6MDYgMDE6NDg6NDYAMjAw MzowMjowNiAwMTo0ODo0NgAAAAAeAAAACgAAAlgAAABkAAABQAAAAGQAAABNAAAAZAAAAAAAAABk AAABQAAAAGQAAAImAAAAZAAACXsAAAABAAAJewAAAAFGVUpJRklMTQwAAAAVAAAABwAEAAAAMDEz MAAQAgAIAAAADgEAAAEQAwABAAAAAwAAAAIQAwABAAAAAAAAAAMQAwABAAAAAAAAABAQAwABAAAA AAAAABEQCgABAAAAFgEAACAQAwABAAAAAAAAACEQAwABAAAAAAAAACIQAwABAAAAAAAAACMQAwAC AAAAgALgATAQAwABAAAAAAAAADEQAwABAAAAAAAAADIQAwABAAAAAQAAAAARAwABAAAAAAAAAAER AwABAAAAAAAAAAASAwABAAAAAAAAABASAwABAAAAAAAAAAATAwABAAAAAAAAAAETAwABAAAAAAAA AAITAwABAAAAAAAAAAAAAABOT1JNQUwgAAAAAAAKAAAAAAIAAQACAAAABFI5OAAAAgAHAAAABDAx MDAAAAAAAAgBAwADAAAAAQAGAAABEgADAAAAAQABAAABGgAFAAAAAQAABNQBGwAFAAAAAQAABNwB KAADAAAAAQACAAACAQAEAAAAAQAABOQCAgAEAAAAAQAAIlMCEwADAAAAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAASAAA AAEAAABIAAAAAf/Y/9sAxQAEBAQFBAMGBQQFBgYGBwkPCQkICAkSDQ4LDxYTFxYVExUUGBsjHRgZ IRoUFR4pHiEkJScnJxcdKy4qJi0jJiclAQQGBgkHCREJCRElGRQVJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUl JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUCBAYGCQcJEQkJESUZFBUlJSUlJSUlJSUl JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJf/EAaIAAAEFAQEBAQEBAAAA AAAAAAABAgMEBQYHCAkKCxAAAgEDAwIEAwUFBAQAAAF9AQIDAAQRBRIhMUEGE1FhByJxFDKBkaEI I0KxwRVS0fAkM2JyggkKFhcYGRolJicoKSo0NTY3ODk6Q0RFRkdISUpTVFVWV1hZWmNkZWZnaGlq c3R1dnd4eXqDhIWGh4iJipKTlJWWl5iZmqKjpKWmp6ipqrKztLW2t7i5usLDxMXGx8jJytLT1NXW 19jZ2uHi4+Tl5ufo6erx8vP09fb3+Pn6AQADAQEBAQEBAQEBAAAAAAAAAQIDBAUGBwgJCgsRAAIB AgQEAwQHBQQEAAECdwABAgMRBAUhMQYSQVEHYXETIjKBCBRCkaGxwQkjM1LwFWJy0QoWJDThJfEX GBkaJicoKSo1Njc4OTpDREVGR0hJSlNUVVZXWFlaY2RlZmdoaWpzdHV2d3h5eoKDhIWGh4iJipKT lJWWl5iZmqKjpKWmp6ipqrKztLW2t7i5usLDxMXGx8jJytLT1NXW19jZ2uLj5OXm5+jp6vLz9PX2 9/j5+v/AABEIAHgAoAMBIQACEQEDEQL/2gAMAwEAAhEDEQA/APNyDEQsKE8cMTgVUkDb8sVPHYdK BIg2qQdwJx07VBNCv2dHWVCWYgpg5XAGCeMYOexzwenGZKMu5dIIfOmIRQcZJwAal86O8sw5kRkI wCpyDj3/AArNotPoZhnith+7HI4zyc/rWh4i1a50K7vtEjt43VcIyyIRvG1TvyGz83XA6AD3pPTU 0hHmdkcjp+k300TPBZJOpQ/IkoDq2eCATk9uOcjdjpkMW33TSwwus6xuVEiZw3XBGecHHoKTTS1N G4y1iM/sm6diFibI7Yp8Hh65u1Pl4OASdvzYx1zj8KxvroGiWpt6bZvoNxIlwJMShW2smw98Hn8a 6O3Vr6QRWttcyuRjYsZJ/T8K8bFYOpUl7RI9XD42nRjyNlufw1qOkqDNp2o2KOc5lt3QP2/iWubv NDFxM1xNCGZsbmBZOOnPX+lc8fbU3eUTsU6M3eLLlz5l1p1vZSJKiW4CqRtOABgfpXJW3hKe5vyB Lb+Ru3Mw3CQjsMHj/wDVXTSxKTbZy1KElHl6G1deCbdrUrb3MoLDDZwc/pWC3he4sMrZSxMGXDbs g/1rphiW9JI5Z0Ve6Z7FKw6KBis985yTkGvcPGQ1/mQ5yO2KrsIjbsCknmbgVfcMAc5BGOSeOcjH PXPElIoT2kN5CsV0heIHcFyRzVFrS1RSkINoVUZ6vG5AA+YD5lJx1G4ZI4UDIl7GsHZ67ED2nl3P kTwiKbGRhgyuOzKwyGB6gjg10Gv6Xc3N/Z31zFLNLOvlXLygkrcoNrByF2pkBiEBJCqCQuQKy1kr G9lSe+jRWsojFeqsA2XCoZNq9QM45HIYHOMdCDjvirWv+HL2K1udfs40hniwk8JQ7uVO6TBJ3YKn PHHBPI3NfL7rTMIztNCZsdeYXOm2kosIggYTfvTE20BgSWI6g4Pyg4ztTO0aljcQWHlW7SIruSFh XsFHPIO3Az64OSewrSGq0MqseWVmReIZJUtftkIKvER5fJA5IB6YOcH1plvNexxgxXM4YjktIX59 RuzWpzbkl9f3c+jvZSgsDj5n5bAII549PQ1zMdiFZdysD2wMnP8ASoaNI2SN+2iRYSiXTI7cFMk/ mOmKjFtK+sNDaEyqMZVQM/dye3bOPwrllhqc9WjqjiKkFZMiuba8RyPMMZ9hgj25z/KqjTXWB5yM +O4wc/yrilhY7ROpV5WuzqCoHLY9s1C6huvH0r1WzzkiJoztIAxgbj9KryWMzRnOVVcHO7b0Oev4 c/lU37F7GgmhSeXJ5qyfLtwD8rNnuB3HB5HA49RTn0cQsjfuMMQcDJyMZxz/AJ9M0n5iTuykz2sp /wBIih1K3iff9kbdiRycMdylXTIP31/iCgggLjr/AAtcW9jrdxmK21KxvEAubOfbJJauWA80KeHB CjLR54AJAChKS8joTuuVnL+I/DUXhXWXguZRPcGTd5u0hDEFHluoOcD5pFwPQ571ZufEESaTDDBb 2dzMEJYsv3Y8lXVs4ySo/hyMN14IrS6MdOU4CwU6N4ou9OWfyoJ0DRb92WQ4ZA23p8pyevTp0rrz dyrdrJczrKuRGJCF3EKvEYyBtB4ByNxHephdbG1bkm05OzaKWsXJkt4bMuCzNuSORySckEkbewAA x87c5baAMbFsj+SVlQK6DBAYMOpGQRwRx1rRaHNLorWaHm28wZx700Wu3gjimQJ5IaZI1QtuIAx2 Paucs4Jr3UrnymZWmPCKxHU5zx0AGfwoEbK6Zq8UgCuCvs64P171aXS9TbJktoWHbkA/nk1jKKNY yexr2enQ38E8j3tvb+RC8v77d85U/cTAOWOO+B71gT3RtJHh+VTkKTsztGASe3+IzWjVtyVq7GlY XtvMuJZP4sb+y9QO2cYNXJZ7i2ZcQNBuBKtMPLLLnkjcSTyvb+7XJKry+6ldndTwzmudu0e7KFzr Q3tDFcllzlWtos5HzZ3MwBB4HRe/tWDJcT3KB2c7ckKZCXz3wMkeorN0J1Pjdl2R0xxFKj/Cjd93 /kXoo7GGIT+aILpHiEc5k+z7HO47t4JCYYKAdv8AECSoHFCDTo1mVotQcNvyuTh0bsRg+wIIz0rr cEkkjzudybbL8nixrqRNH8ao99pwby47tQRcWrEAbgepGeSCDnOeelYs2jeI7ia2On31rrunJGyQ XCsWVEAaQow6o3Vtvq2BknFCbexsuVRtJafkxNO0mfT9Rt7671CKw1C5cRffKCCMhkfdg5C42g+z sMGrdjqFxB4igARXlbb5bxrsMuDtGzjOWyoGAM8ccVtFWRw1Jc0vQ2BocFz50txGB5bNNGrqGCgn Jww7deeR06dultdHuTbpdXW22+UlRKQZAeoPBwTwO/1OOKWzL3jft/X+Zrp9n1C3Y3lsjSIBl0yj Afjg9j/nNc/rFomlzRIs5kEpO0MvQfX8qPQzOWu7yOKCdyzBkjONvqeAfzrM0K5a1MV3OhZTI2WA z/DtAz+dNgem2Os213GoIUgDsOR9RXSxKksYwFZSOOMiuSommb02mefXNugIjdnhBZcMFyODz3PY A8/pxVjUrC41B2lkjCyRqs7mAhkUOo5bBIGWdc9DuOODxXdKz0Rzq/U5yOd7eZJ4He0nhdWSSNyr RsDwRjpzjHPXpWY8EsBZZHJjkbeRu4Yjv9f8a5YuxvuXYoykzLILckAAeWFIG36Eg/dPXOQc981M 8UltGhRGCkBiCo56/Moz3wPyNatjSMnUpg2i3BVWKFRvaPG0YK5BJGOpXgcjjsa5W31WVTFZBpfs 5ULH5rghBnhcjoMmkkSy7czTPdsI4++3yZDv2kDnkfNjJGMj8TVu28y4Pn2Ud5D5OI2uYwVChi2A zr3IBOOnB9KhwvqaQk1p3LWq299qgsDPefaorZGEcqMB8z/M25sgAjhemPl4yOa9Q0XS9A1KSO4v tTGsXz5YRZ2Kr7ssVQgHBI5z1yT3OcoVb6Pc3qULK6Oxuo7LS9MMV2bSws40KFECgFe4J6dz+dcn pmqxSoLPTlWRkheQXT4YMoJ24HuMfr9K2scutmcZP4m1JWcSSo6SspIMY4ZQcAdyDubjOOByCAwT UdYn1AwyzW/yj5UdGzgcE8EfT8x0zW3kYWOevpWubZo4/k81lXaerDryO3IFTNp8lkVRoiuFAyB+ f15zUsZZjLIQ0RKsOmDjFdLpniWS0bE+WBPJI4/z7j8qlpSVmO9tUel3em2UdqkbfZA6T+TcAoUu VYGNx/rAo3Ft6gbflVjuLYUjhzZoLJkmuZby4Ill8izikDIY9zDzAVClNq5yCcYPC11VEloZUm92 c7dIsEctzcON5dy8TJ/qlVU6jvkluv8ASoLeZoRETbveWU3Tapdox+HJHuORXE+51R7D7zTHtIRd WcoktmbIOQSPTPtz1H+FOutRt5LNreCyLoGaSNZpMMAMlYWcFQwbccttGMfwgmnG2zKknujJmFrH pk1tceZBDJCIY2iBeMFGTIO4hlbIJO7B+YHGCDWdovhS9124kht9OuZ1QYJMyx4PUfwt+GeODzWm hEVKTse62Xwy0r7Cp1sXzSLt2F7xXHAxypjxnGB+HeotZ8E+GlsTHpDXdhqiqPLlabMYbOATGqeZ 0bjawGcHBAwYfmbRTcuSmr/1+B5Frd1PpmrtFqVuqXDgkXMSeUJgSQcpgKRnHy7V45PXNUdUu7e3 Mc6RSTwScR3MaRxMcAbyUEjY+Zsc4yMHAzgc0qfN7y0OlVeT3N7dURLdQalci5N2bh1GFaWQts47 Z+6MD2zXdeG9NvtNXTrydEFlIhgabeNufLY+ucZA56cij2yhZTIdJz5nA4m+c/ZSVxuXDAntjr+m atpKqxhZG2wvgtzjB7HPTHJ68DJOVyxPaeaYGsRMmpWlnsZcnzCe5DH+XGfoasrrtxbvsU5TgFeo wOwB4H8/fpSYzSg1S1ul3PGU5AJUHGT/APW98nB4rnr/AFRpmZLbKIcZY8Mf8P8APrU+RaPrHW7i 2g0tZ7zQZ9BaUebH/wATFNmxhkuYlhGIzg9AFyT6EDx+61Xw60rPLLcfa41QwvbTFwjLtwRhCpHy njPXuMYrdtJW6jhScrSbtEpjVrCO1EtirXAto9zJKSrKAQACcZP4cD2qhLcOmoeeY3tFutyS2sin LMSSSR/CQQ3YZyPbHNruzqtBq0Ft1Yx7ufRZ4JLCxlnjdwGitx1zwCgH8eccY59q0/7Kt9X0hNS0 cOM8vbsvzI3BIx2YEjj8u1ZtaBzJsbot9JZamiTT77YbZGuEQyPAAv8AdYjcBxnjOEzyF59Qg8EW +sww6xZaylqvlMILmyjWNt3IydpA9Qw69s8YqqcudXHUape60chN46Ph3V57HxL5etRRyYW+t58d ckB0B2g8dDjofvVzGt/EK+v7me00zydNsTOyxPbAB5F2na3IHXjpjHQkZzWll8zGVabjybR+77+5 540AvYYpIpJp7ghnnDBiHJHygkZPJIXBA5P3uRjsr3SpND8Wxadpk8s8aDLCJBLKAY87WXADDKjK nkrj+8abdiKa5rryPPVsBclNRDC2UgAiJQoVskYwMbfy9AKnsdQ1mzvnitXe8iD422zgkHGOVGec D+IHpWMop7nTzcq89PyOjbxVp16ZYNQsdpLsoKE/c4wuDznO7nPcdMZOuLG3njeLSb5LhY8qr7SM jJAbBAIHHGQKhJ09FsYytPfcybywlkd3ubc28lvH8jlSVkQjG0kZUHOcZ2nnvkYzBpk0TeZeJImX aMp0YMADzxx15HXjnHBro5k1oc/LZ2ZUeZ1kyj+Um0rhOOCMEfiBg+vfNZZdpTthwFU8t6/SmhvQ 39S16bU9wm4hBaSOMEcZ7Z7Dp7n9aNPkDSZZUYDBCs6gcdevB4HTqTirW+gSk3qz1PSfDV/eZOna fcyXjQhQZSCsJUAgsTxu34IXqBjPTJ7DRvg3MubvX9UVrkxGJyg3MDxtJduThVXjA/lSRrU91KP9 f0v8zEXTdR0eaOVVlieJ2i86NGVHZTglSex5Iz1H41W1WR5LmfWtMK2uqIFaSJQfJvsZyHUcB8Hg /XocGstU7Ep9StdR6d4n0KPXNDaN1mBE0AOfm/iUjsw7juCD3BPmmofbtL06SzgvbpdKmYsyJIQE YjGGHdTwPwGe1cyvCp5M7mlUp+aOl8AK+neD/Ed61rDcbkjhSF0LrI3zcFR1HzCuA/sm6sVillHm IzbWt1YeawUYfAI5wQenX6V17WPPdrs3dD+xnVtOlhkkkiScOyxKWc7SHIKk8YK+nQdasW+usvxX t7+b5EubzAlkyqiLAC499vX3xTe2hdNXkkyfxLZXl3rc9/5bRFppIo7hRhGjXcsY44I4X/Oa47Qt cuPDd6trNbRlGy/71pFAZ1AMgZSGUj5eRx8gBB5zi7SukdUpWSf9bI9Ru/Bdh4mtn1HQbu3v5WVp 5bYSqtxEPmY9gHCgDc2AoJAGcivOz4V1iOV1QtA4ciRJcptOeOvJPI4xnB6YpRk17sjFxT1idks1 3ZaUbZr2W4G5s3EigM+T0xk4GO2T1POMAc1JBNLOYreKaaRh8scaFmIHPQcnpW0UjBs5eaYzMQ4w np3P1pVfA+U+2KohnsHhz4P69q0iTXKxabbMQwM48yTaeR8g49AQxB56cYr2Kx+Gug+Hbq1W2Vpr 92DG4kbc0KqBuKjoCSPl4JBJ54o6G0LOST2/yPWrYMkCxWFusMSgKGcdB06Vla3rWi+H7P7V4h1C FFHA81gMnrgDufbrVWMJSbd3ueJa78a9L1K+XSLS2ngspyu68lXan3lIGDyAcdwP61y3i/V49B1N LaxjS+NwCXj88L9nIK4z1IyGOOD09+DRoEmjx2XxBqnh/wAXtfZgZJkTz4oV2RzDaDzyTuGThjz+ GRXpkdxa63pn9oaYokhkz5kbLyvqGHt+WOenNctWN16HdQlZ2MTyodDsJZbRpUO4uJCTt28fu2H1 XIPuQecGoJ7r7ezdbW6aMxAkNuC8Ejkjnrzwfyq4SUomNWLjIfHaW1ja3Gp28txBd28DFJo2wzkA 8NkYbOPSuF0zxDNpWpbtSsIblRGUVCiqec/MGGCD83Y84AIIxiZ9hUn17HuWjW9j4xmsIPCuvCPU 57zb/Z+pokiqA25WZ2Hlzj5hkYDEnAU5GZtb+F2q6FcqfFOnxvZqwAnj/eLNk4AQryDnscH2rnoQ abcjqrSXLaJw9n4QWx1GW5+1TLCx3xwK2Cp3ZAc/Qfw88jkEYrqZdRuJGnaeTzJLjPmvINzNlgxI JGQdwzke/qa7UjmjLUm07RG1iJmXEcanDSMMjPoPU1qX+kNpuhTppcUsMbqVa4Iy2ccFm9Aew9fU 80jnqvXlR4fq+hahollFc6pEsCyNjYW+ZeMgke+D+XOK6yHwhF/wjh+0RbbwqX3+YRtz0GOnHfgn rzxTWrKaPs5FnkUFnES45UDHf1+mK4Sbxj4f0Gae9u76G4uLjHkxxbmfywMDKkAg5zk9DgcmmOGi b+X9fK55z4o+LuqXWmONLY6aCf3asis+3jLcnCnPQAPnB6YGa2gX0fiX4Vaub+VWvbOZp3nlO6QJ 9/JxzjBdQPQY7U32IiuX3jwya4hgAgjhhljWQq1wAcyAshUYb5QAVOPlB+c5zwB0Nyt/BYtZ2UzR xxxKslu0xZHcbMlM4wxIDYwecDooNODUXqKonJbmLrWgXccKPc+S0TgkNCwZFcffTI4BBPbgggjI IJxvDviC58L6kSil7ZyPMjBwf95ff+f5EZyteyNIXS1Pa7J7LW7YTWTRywyA5TAwPUEf0rl9R0U2 Mw8xFazkcBp3IzDngCTuU9/64J44+5I7Ze/G63DXrmzjtoNP0+NLia9DReYkn+jj5BgqxA5ORgcj J+8MVylxoN/5iLd2M8ckqvLCkiEZAyCc4wQDkHByGGOtFVPRmdJpO5rr8N5rzXGm0q7FvpuY5Elm UsXUhSdgxhyCW7gfLgsDXuiardReF4dIub+9u4YMbVuJS/qACep2gKFHAA7ckneEXe/QznNctupz gCGbY3fgcVuReDDFELvU97pniKIHrn7rNjj8OcGtzjUuUbfXbcRx7UCD5VjGFX6YrJ8K+P2uPE19 psYgvbP7KWMjRKwRhIo3hsZJ6AEnpxUt2Wg6cbvU6u68i/ke5gjbcX2MQmdqgDrj1wOn86z9S0iW 10xdREjxb9xjh2PiVchSFIHI5fOTgbTzniueLcXyo+t+p0pYZ1m9djhLv4m61r16yTSrY2SAu6RH krxjcxHTcQOMcHHvXmLS+dcNM2ELNuyueB1P+c961lK58+o8sPUvrcbIZTP5U6+Wwbzi+ASMbvlO cjgjtkDIIyD3XwjvjZ+KrjTrghY76AptIPLryB+RenF3M5LSx59q2jLYavfWVxM8kSSmIwt8oBDY DcYz6j3IH+90lnq0cE6P5TK8qmIyBgERWG1jt2nqCT35JOOgF3SMdzuWWDxFHa2x0swxC28m5+zs 3YErM5O7LIzOzYHK5UYGK8j1rQ4NOMsDzJJIqqVIGBzyP0qHZ7FrzOQ0rXrvw/rAntiQBw8RPyuP 8fQ//XFfQmk6na+ItJW6snVkZSksMgGV45UjuDnH4+hBOM0dVOXQ4nUPDl5Z6xFFY2B1KzeQFEcl jbnjg88r068cc+te/abcand6Na2euSw3gtYRDbmWBcQJkZCdudqjPJG3AIBOXDV2M6nu6jprRXXy oVAIHHH5VzMmmXV7cG30+FnkbJJPQAdSSePSunY5Htc3rTT7XQwrBhc3W35pWGVT12A9/f27Zrqt N+Jtr4esCPEFnJd6ejgvFGiNv9AVbjGefqoqjn3Zwk9lovjqK4v9GnubWOYh5bZkjQRsScxL1yoy DjAwCBlsMa0rTQLHSFY2FjbwKcIxRVQSAcDJ749T711wwvtHFQ6pv5Xsc1THKl7SU9otJebtcppH Bo2p/bLJFGCU34yFOc42tkMOhAK49uKr6v4n1dtDutOuZEv4rgqfOdPnjCgDg9VHGODjArmlTcJ6 9D6CljVUwzprrazPna3VV0+8ZeJVRYweGUqxO4YI5PA6dMUumo11qMcUqyEORuWPkcHHf5RyQMnp muNITukju9K0N4NNije4lilliIc8rIq4KsgO4llZGGdwBBwOmc6KadaaCYdUtVkE1i6yls5JQMN/ HTJTcOlbLuccpalL4o2X2Xxit3GG2XkayBjjGR8pA/AA/jXJX6+Zp9u7f6lW3ZYZWPkc47fdHI9B mga2LWu+Pb66sZbfSrdbKwIxsUgFh792P+PQCuKvb0S3XmeZI8jjMu5cANk9Dk5GNpzgdcY4yUXb qYdxbickr97tXqfw+8F67Z3w1K7kbTbVhzDImXm56bcjb3wx9uCCalq+g1Ll1PcBLFbrlIwDkMMA dc9wetattI0yvIxCliWPGOfQCtYqyMW77m/p+kS3oWZ2MNsCQZD1Psvv79Bjv0rcuI4HtPJgQx7Q GZxgBlAwM4HX3p9TGUr6HO6/ot1p0oN1BuV13xsjfI6Y4IP/AOo/jXg/xC8MapqiRy2FxKYY18z7 HJHt7feB/iyOgP4dcVMr2sjSmkndnnPw/wDEEHh3Wp5p5ZUWSI4COQuQc9MHJ9P5c19Y2mtMsdi9 9ZvEs5VYknPl+aC+0/MxAA6jPQYNevldaMW+Z+h4ec0JyUeRaX1KniK60G5gVfD5nisApdpJ1G5n yCQSDzhSPYZ7nJPkuv8AiO3srVF0yZLiRnK7wwKxYAOTz6Hjt1+ledOTd2z2qcVFKK2OTtNH8+OS 3ncEW1w5lKISXAVQMcZPf8/wPcWunW1n88Maq+Apc8tgY4ye3A46VzxWh01p6R9P1M3S01Rb+e61 OQ+UycRg5AIP8IGcDr7njrU2l6jd6styL+ziitio2BW37gcqyk+uR0wOCOOQS4+ZhJLdHbWOnaX4 i8CWb67C08thDJahvMbIdflLEgj+5u549a8ZdkstZlsYHZrY/PEXYMdh5AJAwSOhI4yDQ9zRGVr9 gsumo8EYVYyTIAMZA6Ef1/8ArnFHRPCup+JZCNMt38tHIluZRsiTp1b177QCcc81O2xpe6s+h7r4 f8D6V4ZJkYfbbxTzPMgXYc5+VedpGBzyevIziuokmJXgjjPJ71qkc8ncxLq6gtYmmu5kSNeru2AB 715VqXxeWLUPs+kwSi12lXnYBZM9mjByBwM/MD16DHMydkVBXep9nRRPebWmbIbjYPX09q6bSNE0 28hurS64udrRpFIoYOOmM9Mc9/Wn5GUY6XOPsfM8P27+FL6ZBHAiwxm7cHeANqjJGAxPO7gAbuRW bL4dF7DdTzwXSrbwBnd/3azSNt2qp/ujcMsPpzmpldaI2jZ7nmV94f8AB2ga013LZXEuoy4lEx+R CrHDMCxPIYYDAc/Nn0PJ+O4H1Xw2qWMpikaQPGsTbVBB27TjJ6Mx/L0rVpRi2jO7lJXPNrPQntjv 1G5lvMDcuWOQB0wM89T+ffmp7kxmF42u44YMM6RyMwUyAhcBQpG5gOSdo/djngA4Q11N5XWh1lqq jVJJI0CecC5BYnJ4HAPIxj8gaq6pdalJcxwaWpUckyYGDgZ78D+vaqd0nYJpe7ft+rLV9JqcNoPs EcUzIB5jyDG7APAx0JP4dM+1ue+NukZkimdZHEe9Np2EkKCcn/aHQGlezMuW9rG5pOmre6Pr2lBo z9rXzY0K42vtABznnlV7cY6814ZY6dfL4gS08h5LnKhY4l35yoIxjOc5zx6027blR1PctK8E7ds+ ulcrhhaxsGU8/wAbA+3QevUYxXZxTG2R4Yre3WIrsjCJhUBIJOBgA9fzJ600nuS5FK5lVQSSWbuS a4nxF4tstDh/ft5tw4yluhBdvf2Huf8A61XsQtTxfVNdvNcu/Ov3/dK26OBfux8Y/E+59TjHSsO2 jtZPGWmR3QjW2e5iWbcMLs3AHPtisWzoSsfZ+h+OoXtbe7glWWSUlSYzvjVgShwcgkbgcMD75wc1 U0j4tXtvO0McSJKchpBnrnGAM5/Wto7mTWiSNjWPFUPiaGOSdc3EYIWXdg9uG6+gweCP0rjbn4rx 3893ptrPJYSQzFWidVKsR97byxJJjB4x27ZqZWumOCepjy+NJdc0q7t7W5vPPkBSeKRwGYFvvjAG QVO0qSTkAljnA5aZ3jHkPM8skTYlfdklgMbck4wAMdvyxVVH7oqe9iu4llZ13BHGCOmSfpmsa/Tb HJcK1wskI5kgk2O6HOVzjA3KSvfGenWuOL5TravoRR6msdgt7G/lMMMFbkNxkqcHoeAR7mujgvkn CyQHeki71JYfkeeD1+nNbp9DCrsh6zXJuHWfYV4KMnp6H3B79DW7pWn3WpsXtkCxLw0rnCjnB57k c8fyoTujJxs9D0HSrSKzsB9jRXL5/wBNmiJGTjlFyGdfTnbww3A8VHZabpmjee1haxxPM5d5SoZ3 yc4z2HT5Rxx0zzVpdxN20RO0jMpMmUHOBnmsy6vVjQ7cADnk8CtCDyjXPF811Kbfw/iVzkPcEZCA DkoDgEjGck4+teKS+eLx3vTK05PztKSWJHHOfpWTdzoirE0cmBgVWurT7Qd6cue2ahlLQntf7Xhs JbOzuGjguBiSMMOR3/PocdR7VspDq1xGBPq0yMq4BiyCfqRyfxpK43Y3vDEc2nu0SYhvSpWC5UAq 4/usDxnHTjBwO4GcrxO97Lr322+tlt52UFnjJKsRwCMn5eNowT29655XSsdEWpam94cf7UqyyO7z oCu9WIbsMHH48mu91Odbm1t5GUrIiGN85U4HQ++STn6Vrz3jZmbhaV0c2WCQkROwTBII5x7+nb8z Vd5olg+YqCeAQcZ6+v41Az//2QAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/9sAxQAEAQEBAQECAQEBAgICAgMFAwMCAgMG BAQDBQcGBwcHBgcHCAkLCggICwgHBwoOCgsMDA0NDQcJDg8ODA8LDQ0MAQQCAgMCAwYDAwYMCAcH DAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwCBAICAwID BgMDBgwIBwcMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwM DP/EAaIAAAEFAQEBAQEBAAAAAAAAAAABAgMEBQYHCAkKCxAAAgEDAwIEAwUFBAQAAAF9AQIDAAQR BRIhMUEGE1FhByJxFDKBkaEII0KxwRVS0fAkM2JyggkKFhcYGRolJicoKSo0NTY3ODk6Q0RFRkdI SUpTVFVWV1hZWmNkZWZnaGlqc3R1dnd4eXqDhIWGh4iJipKTlJWWl5iZmqKjpKWmp6ipqrKztLW2 t7i5usLDxMXGx8jJytLT1NXW19jZ2uHi4+Tl5ufo6erx8vP09fb3+Pn6AQADAQEBAQEBAQEBAAAA AAAAAQIDBAUGBwgJCgsRAAIBAgQEAwQHBQQEAAECdwABAgMRBAUhMQYSQVEHYXETIjKBCBRCkaGx wQkjM1LwFWJy0QoWJDThJfEXGBkaJicoKSo1Njc4OTpDREVGR0hJSlNUVVZXWFlaY2RlZmdoaWpz dHV2d3h5eoKDhIWGh4iJipKTlJWWl5iZmqKjpKWmp6ipqrKztLW2t7i5usLDxMXGx8jJytLT1NXW 19jZ2uLj5OXm5+jp6vLz9PX29/j5+v/dAAQABP/AABEIA8AFAAMBIQACEQEDEQL/2gAMAwEAAhED EQA/APH7ONiqqgEikZIbgVJbJJ5vMecgjaTxRbXQV+ZE8GmxsFXDjIwR6GnWtnLa/u45Ixnglh1p PsxtreJZtLWEgSLkMDjeOrVIllCzNGYmOf7wzz2oSdncW+4qW489R5eGYYwRjIFLd6REpMgUZZuV A4X0p2W4OzP/0PNbm0Mh2gFXP3ge4FJDpBuYHmjAXyeMAdabl0RKWvMRTeeilyPmHynYvSoS0UkQ E8bBTwGXoTUuyVkOEtCNsQy7LOZl3AY4yCKa0UquZ26DhdoyQaOa2qC/YRoWSMGRH255HUfn60Mo lDeUjblbgDjPt9ae60KSSR//0fIZbeRpBuyrKRgAYzTYw4curkcZwD+dKNrWCnFJ6j9sUpLSRAZI J4/lQI1kz+52hRngZwKYOz1RGDdEfPvBHB55xSSOigncxC87u1J36DuxkhuJW/iyOCSev0pjKoYM zSrIDyyDihLQFoj/0vGYbd+CiBVI3EAcHHtT5VjiiBMTqxYcZyP/ANdS4qfyG7Jakd1LIhV1Y7jw D7dsiopDK8+ZkIUnBxzg+oo0lZII6K4uo20SbLlAxC5AI6gmmwQwupDpgDJGe5/wpxTSsxpXdiNi


November 03, 2006 - November 12, 2006

RV10-Archive.digest.vol-br