RV10-Archive.digest.vol-bx

January 02, 2007 - January 15, 2007



      cost of components for the brake lines so I haven't set the price for 
      them.
      
          I am putting this out to the list to gauge interest. I have most of 
      the pieces of the puzzle in place to begin selling them. I just need to 
      hear from you builders as to whether there is interest.
      
      
            
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: cloudvalley(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: New Design Brake Pedals and Stainless Brake Lines
Date: Jan 02, 2007
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Albert Gardner" <ibspud(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: New Design Brake Pedals and Stainless Brake Lines
Date: Jan 02, 2007
Dave-I'm interested but the pictures don't show details very well. Do you have any others that show details better? Albert Gardner Yuma, AZ -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dave Hertner Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 9:19 AM Subject: RV10-List: New Design Brake Pedals and Stainless Brake Lines RV-10 Listers, I have just completed my newly designed Brake Pedals and Teflon-cored braided stainless steel brake line system. I am considering offering this package up for sale. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 02, 2007
From: MauleDriver <MauleDriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: My experience with backrivet sets
I've been using the backrivet set from ATS and getting acceptable results. However, I recently had my first opportunity to use a 12" long backrivet from Cleaveland and discovered that it was easier to get good results. The ATS has a thick plastic collar that I had to grind a flat spot on in order to get squarely on the J stiffener rivets. I've hit it twice more with the grinder to ease access on other rivets. The ATS also has a convex face on the set. I found that unless the set was well centered and straight, it was easy to get tilted, concave shop heads. The Cleaveland 12" tool (or whoever's tool they distribute) has a thin plastic collar and I found it fit the J stiffeners very nicely. The face of the set is flatter and it's easier to get square, flat shop heads. I just ordered their normal length backrivet set and understand it is setup the same as the 12". Just sharing the experience. Bill (backriveting the tailcone & trying to finish those elevators) Watson ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <ricksked(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: My experience with backrivet sets
Date: Jan 02, 2007
That same set is great for backriveting your top wing skins on with as well....put the bucking bar on the rivet head and set the rivet using the 12" set from inside the wing. It took us about an hour and a half to do all of the top skins after placing the rivets and taping half of them in, removing clecos and repeating. Used the 3lb dumbell looking bucking bar from Cleavland. Not a blemish one on the top skins. Rick S. 40185 ----- Original Message ----- From: "MauleDriver" <MauleDriver(at)nc.rr.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 11:42 AM Subject: RV10-List: My experience with backrivet sets > > I've been using the backrivet set from ATS and getting acceptable results. > However, I recently had my first opportunity to use a 12" long backrivet > from Cleaveland and discovered that it was easier to get good results. > > The ATS has a thick plastic collar that I had to grind a flat spot on in > order to get squarely on the J stiffener rivets. I've hit it twice more > with the grinder to ease access on other rivets. > > The ATS also has a convex face on the set. I found that unless the set > was well centered and straight, it was easy to get tilted, concave shop > heads. > > The Cleaveland 12" tool (or whoever's tool they distribute) has a thin > plastic collar and I found it fit the J stiffeners very nicely. The face > of the set is flatter and it's easier to get square, flat shop heads. I > just ordered their normal length backrivet set and understand it is setup > the same as the 12". > > Just sharing the experience. > > Bill (backriveting the tailcone & trying to finish those elevators) Watson > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 02, 2007
From: "Mike Lauritsen - Work" <mike(at)cleavelandtool.com>
Subject: Re: New Design Brake Pedals and Stainless Brake Lines
I put the full size photos on our website at: www.cleavelandtool.com/filecab/brakes.htm On 1/2/07, Albert Gardner wrote: > > Dave-I'm interested but the pictures don't show details very well. Do you > have any others that show details better? > > Albert Gardner > > Yuma , AZ > > > -----Original Message----- > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto: > owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Dave Hertner > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 02, 2007 9:19 AM > *To:* RV10-List(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* RV10-List: New Design Brake Pedals and Stainless Brake Lines > > RV-10 Listers, > > > I have just completed my newly designed Brake Pedals and Teflon-cored > braided stainless steel brake line system. I am considering offering this > package up for sale. > > > * > > > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > http://forums.matronics.com > > * > > -- Mike Lauritsen Cleaveland Aircraft Tool 515-432-6794 www.cleavelandtool.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 02, 2007
From: "Mike Lauritsen - Work" <mike(at)cleavelandtool.com>
Subject: Re: My experience with backrivet sets
Thanks again Bill for the kind words. We designed and manufacture our own. We find it works better in a variety of areas. The thin collars occasionally fracture, but it is worth the risk, and we have replacements if that happens. Originally we made the collars out of aluminum. We had complaints that it marked the back side up. Although this is not really a problem functionally we switched to the delrin material. Mike -- Mike Lauritsen Cleaveland Aircraft Tool 515-432-6794 www.cleavelandtool.com On 1/2/07, MauleDriver wrote: > > > I've been using the backrivet set from ATS and getting acceptable > results. However, I recently had my first opportunity to use a 12" long > backrivet from Cleaveland and discovered that it was easier to get good > results. > > The ATS has a thick plastic collar that I had to grind a flat spot on in > order to get squarely on the J stiffener rivets. I've hit it twice more > with the grinder to ease access on other rivets. > > The ATS also has a convex face on the set. I found that unless the set > was well centered and straight, it was easy to get tilted, concave shop > heads. > > The Cleaveland 12" tool (or whoever's tool they distribute) has a thin > plastic collar and I found it fit the J stiffeners very nicely. The face > of the set is flatter and it's easier to get square, flat shop heads. I > just ordered their normal length backrivet set and understand it is > setup the same as the 12". > > Just sharing the experience. > > Bill (backriveting the tailcone & trying to finish those elevators) Watson > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Grimstad" <bldgrv10450(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: New Design Brake Pedals and Stainless Brake Lines
Date: Jan 02, 2007
Dave I am interested in your pedal design and the break line plumbing work. Does Matco advise and approve the inverted master cylinders? Is there a greater chance for leakage? Have you considered the weight change from the original design? Questions, questions, I know. Thanks for putting your effort into this design change. I have not liked the rudder pedal design from the beginning and agree with you 100% that it needs improvement. Paul Grimstad RV10 40450 fuselage Portland, OR 97219 ----- Original Message ----- From: Dave Hertner To: RV10-List(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 8:18 AM Subject: RV10-List: New Design Brake Pedals and Stainless Brake Lines RV-10 Listers, I have just completed my newly designed Brake Pedals and Teflon-cored braided stainless steel brake line system. I am considering offering this package up for sale. Brake Pedals I designed the brake pedals to eliminate a problem a number of RV pilots have shared with me. When coming in for a landing with a crosswind it is very easy to be applying the brake simultaneously with moderate rudder inputs. This leads to higher tire wear due to the application of brake at touchdown. In extreme cases the aircraft could veer unexpectedly upon touchdown. My design allows room for your toe and provides a separate pedal tread for rudder only application. When you are applying rudder the brake pedal is depressed OFF. You simply move your foot upward, placing your toe on the upper tread and the heal of your foot on the lower tread to apply the brakes. The brake pedal chassis are constructed from stainless steel so that there will be no di-electric issues in an area that sees moisture. The tabs are TIG welded and the assembly is screwed together using stainless steel hardware. The pedal treads are high quality rubber units that come from an automotive supplier. I have designed these brake pedals to exactly fit in place of Van's pedals and they align at the top when the bottom of the rudder hoops are aligned at the bottom. 3 bolts out, 3 bolts in. All you have to do is place the appropriate washers for proper spacing. Teflon-cored Braided Stainless Steel Brake Line System I also developed an upgrade to the Plastic brake line system that Vans provides with the kit. I have replaced the entire brake line system from the reservoir to the Matco Parking brake interface with the aluminium lines on the firewall. In this installation I have inverted the Matco master cylinders. This allows for a much neater installation and less clutter between your feet. I developed this system for a couple of reasons. First, I heard that there were some leakage issues with the plastic lines as well as some sponginess over time that has been attributed to the rubber lined braided hoses that Van's supplies. Secondly, there is aesthetics. I couldn't get over the fact that I am building an aircraft valued over $200,000 that has the same brake lines that are supplied with many ultralight kits. The footwell looks much more professional and much less cluttered. There are 3 photos below showing the entire system installed in my RV-10. I anticipate that the brake pedals are going to sell for $175.00 for one side and $300.00 for both sides. I have yet to receive the total cost of components for the brake lines so I haven't set the price for them. I am putting this out to the list to gauge interest. I have most of the pieces of the puzzle in place to begin selling them. I just need to hear from you builders as to whether there is interest. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 02, 2007
From: Eric Panning <ericmpmail-rv10(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: ELT? 406 vs 121.5
The 406 ELT's provide more precise position information to satellites, with a 2 mile dia search area vs ~ 12 miles for 121.5. They also transmit a unique code that can be looked up in a database and show contact info, etc. The GPS 406 systems offer a less than 0.5 nm radius as they transmit position as well. False error rate for 121.5 is ~ 97%, with 94% turned on at airports. Because the potential search radius is so large, and the signal is anonymous, lot's of resources can be spent looking for potential downed planes (that end up tied down at the airport). With 406, they can call your contact info, or call the tower and ask if your N number is on the field, or just departed, etc. This makes it much more likely that you will get an emergency response that makes a difference. As an example, what if you were flying and crashed 10 miles away before you could get a mayday out? With a 406 beacon, then would start calling contact info, home field, etc. If they called the field, and they said you just left and could not raise you - then the calvary could be sent out faster looking for you (and have a good idea where to start). Same situation with 121.5, you crashed close enough to the airport that they might assume you are another of the 97% false alarms and not do anything initially other than call the tower (who would ask local traffic to check their ELT and see if they hear 121.5). I'm not sure how many successful rescues, or even if faster would make much of a difference. But if faster closure is reached with family and friends than I think it is worth it. http://www.acc.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-060405-037.doc If you are traveling over water, or remote areas, a personal ELT is not a bad investment. This one is less than 700 bucks and is 406 + GPS, all in a small, water proof case. Bring it with you while hiking, biking, kayaking, climbing, etc. I have an older 121.5 personal ELT but am considering upgrading. http://www.westmarine.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/producte/10001/-1/10001/136072/0/0/406%20ELT/All_2/mode+matchallpartial/0/0 Happy Holidays, Eric 40150. Fuselage kit moving slowly, but I've started on my IFR ticket... --- rv10builder wrote: > > > While we're on the subject, is there any real > compelling reason to > install a 406Mhz ELT (other than the obvious > COSPAS-SARSAT discontinued > service in 02/09?). I don't recall ever hearing of > a GA aircraft being > located with the assistance of satellites, and I'm > not clear if this is > a mandate. One other question...is one mfg. of ELT > considered "trash" > whereas another as "treasure"? > > Brian > #40308 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: David Maib <dmaib(at)mac.com>
Subject: Re: New Design Brake Pedals and Stainless Brake Lines
Date: Jan 02, 2007
I would be interested. David Maib #40559 On Jan 2, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Dave Hertner wrote: RV-10 Listers, I have just completed my newly designed Brake Pedals and Teflon- cored braided stainless steel brake line system. I am considering offering this package up for sale. Brake Pedals I designed the brake pedals to eliminate a problem a number of RV pilots have shared with me. When coming in for a landing with a crosswind it is very easy to be applying the brake simultaneously with moderate rudder inputs. This leads to higher tire wear due to the application of brake at touchdown. In extreme cases the aircraft could veer unexpectedly upon touchdown. My design allows room for your toe and provides a separate pedal tread for rudder only application. When you are applying rudder the brake pedal is depressed OFF. You simply move your foot upward, placing your toe on the upper tread and the heal of your foot on the lower tread to apply the brakes. The brake pedal chassis are constructed from stainless steel so that there will be no di-electric issues in an area that sees moisture. The tabs are TIG welded and the assembly is screwed together using stainless steel hardware. The pedal treads are high quality rubber units that come from an automotive supplier. I have designed these brake pedals to exactly fit in place of Van's pedals and they align at the top when the bottom of the rudder hoops are aligned at the bottom. 3 bolts out, 3 bolts in. All you have to do is place the appropriate washers for proper spacing. Teflon-cored Braided Stainless Steel Brake Line System I also developed an upgrade to the Plastic brake line system that Vans provides with the kit. I have replaced the entire brake line system from the reservoir to the Matco Parking brake interface with the aluminium lines on the firewall. In this installation I have inverted the Matco master cylinders. This allows for a much neater installation and less clutter between your feet. I developed this system for a couple of reasons. First, I heard that there were some leakage issues with the plastic lines as well as some sponginess over time that has been attributed to the rubber lined braided hoses that Van's supplies. Secondly, there is aesthetics. I couldn't get over the fact that I am building an aircraft valued over $200,000 that has the same brake lines that are supplied with many ultralight kits. The footwell looks much more professional and much less cluttered. There are 3 photos below showing the entire system installed in my RV-10. I anticipate that the brake pedals are going to sell for $175.00 for one side and $300.00 for both sides. I have yet to receive the total cost of components for the brake lines so I haven't set the price for them. I am putting this out to the list to gauge interest. I have most of the pieces of the puzzle in place to begin selling them. I just need to hear from you builders as to whether there is interest. <004701c72e89$b55ff330$6501a8c0> <004801c72e89$b55ff330$6501a8c0> <004901c72e89$b55ff330$6501a8c0> ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: ELT? 406 vs 121.5
Date: Jan 02, 2007
From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder(at)sausen.net>
Personally, I'm going to go with a PLB for now and a standard ELT in the aircraft. Reasoning being that the price of the aircraft 406 should come down a bit over the next few years and I would rather have a PLB as I like to do a lot of out of the way things where there is no help if you run into trouble. If something would ever happen in the aircraft before I switch to a 406 ELT, hopefully I will still have the option of deploying the PLB and getting the same level of service. In other words still be conscious and able to reach the PLB. Michael Sausen -10 #352 limbo -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Eric Panning Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 3:18 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: ELT? 406 vs 121.5 The 406 ELT's provide more precise position information to satellites, with a 2 mile dia search area vs ~ 12 miles for 121.5. They also transmit a unique code that can be looked up in a database and show contact info, etc. The GPS 406 systems offer a less than 0.5 nm radius as they transmit position as well. False error rate for 121.5 is ~ 97%, with 94% turned on at airports. Because the potential search radius is so large, and the signal is anonymous, lot's of resources can be spent looking for potential downed planes (that end up tied down at the airport). With 406, they can call your contact info, or call the tower and ask if your N number is on the field, or just departed, etc. This makes it much more likely that you will get an emergency response that makes a difference. As an example, what if you were flying and crashed 10 miles away before you could get a mayday out? With a 406 beacon, then would start calling contact info, home field, etc. If they called the field, and they said you just left and could not raise you - then the calvary could be sent out faster looking for you (and have a good idea where to start). Same situation with 121.5, you crashed close enough to the airport that they might assume you are another of the 97% false alarms and not do anything initially other than call the tower (who would ask local traffic to check their ELT and see if they hear 121.5). I'm not sure how many successful rescues, or even if faster would make much of a difference. But if faster closure is reached with family and friends than I think it is worth it. http://www.acc.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-060405-037.doc If you are traveling over water, or remote areas, a personal ELT is not a bad investment. This one is less than 700 bucks and is 406 + GPS, all in a small, water proof case. Bring it with you while hiking, biking, kayaking, climbing, etc. I have an older 121.5 personal ELT but am considering upgrading. http://www.westmarine.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/producte/10001/-1/10 001/136072/0/0/406%20ELT/All_2/mode+matchallpartial/0/0 Happy Holidays, Eric 40150. Fuselage kit moving slowly, but I've started on my IFR ticket... --- rv10builder wrote: > > > While we're on the subject, is there any real > compelling reason to > install a 406Mhz ELT (other than the obvious > COSPAS-SARSAT discontinued > service in 02/09?). I don't recall ever hearing of > a GA aircraft being > located with the assistance of satellites, and I'm > not clear if this is > a mandate. One other question...is one mfg. of ELT > considered "trash" > whereas another as "treasure"? > > Brian > #40308 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net>
Subject: Installing elevators and rudders
Date: Jan 02, 2007
I am just finishing up installing my elevators and rudder and a fellow RV10 builder, Ron Grover, on the field where I'm at, Prop Wash Justin, TX, gave me a great tip and the loan of his tool that really made the job much easer. Actually Ron came over and help me install the elevators. Boy it's really nice to have someone help you that's done something before you. Ron has a beautiful RV8 he built and is working on his 10. Anyway the tool that Ron loaned me, see attachment 1-2-07-1, is for inserting temporarily in the attach brackets to hold the elevator or the rudder in place until you can get the bolt installed. I just put my hand in the picture as a reference to their size I can't remember off hand but I think he said he got them at Aircraft Spruce?. I've also attached a photo of them installed on the rudder if you're able to zoom in a little to see them.Probably everyone already knows about these tools except me :>} I've also attached the finished product 1-2-07-2. It obviously works the same way on the elevators. I've now got the elevators and rudder generally installed I just need to make the final touches. For what ever it's worth Wayne Edgerton #40336 Trying to get this thing finished and start flying if the vendors will just start co-operating :>} Props been delayed AGAIN ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: riveting forward fuse panel area
Date: Jan 02, 2007
From: "Chris Johnston" <CJohnston(at)popsound.com>
hey all - i have many questions!!! I'm now in week 2 of my vacation - been home working on the airplane the whole time... I've just finished the flap actuation section, and I'm into the panel area. I haven't really finalized my panel layout, or even which type of panel (aluminum or fiberglass) I'm going with. Question - Am I a fool to rivet the upper forward fuselage section to the aircraft? Is it really that tough to install the panel if you've done this already? I won't be able to move on if i don't rivet it on, but I don't want to hose myself. also, in this section, you're supposed to rivet on some hinges for the cowl. I'm using camlocs, but I haven't received them yet. should I just leave the rivets out of the firewall flange for now? I'm kinda lost here... it seems like you need the engine on before you can mount the camlocs right? or do you mount the receptacles now, and do the rest when you're doing the cowl? what the heck? thanks in advance! cj #40410 (con)fuse(d) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: LARSON36(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 02, 2007
Subject: Re: New Design Brake Pedals and Stainless Brake Lines
I would be interested, Larry Klein, 40206 _larson36(at)aol.com_ (mailto:larson36(at)aol.com) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: LARSON36(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 02, 2007
Subject: Re: New Design Brake Pedals and Stainless Brake Lines
Dave, I am interested as well Larry Klein 40206 Monterey, Ma. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 02, 2007
From: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: riveting forward fuse panel area
I am holding off riveting the forward fuse panel area. I still have it clecoed in place. I fit the canopy, fit the doors, I just installed the overhead in the canopy, I am working on wiring the plane, I want to get as many of the firewall penetrations completed, put the strips in for the camlocs, and then just before I complete the final install of the canopy, that is when I will rivet in the forward fuse plane. It is much easier working on the plane with the forward panel removable and the canopy off. Larry Rosen #356 Chris Johnston wrote: > hey all - > > i have many questions!!! I'm now in week 2 of my vacation - been home working on the airplane the whole time... I've just finished the flap actuation section, and I'm into the panel area. I haven't really finalized my panel layout, or even which type of panel (aluminum or fiberglass) I'm going with. Question - Am I a fool to rivet the upper forward fuselage section to the aircraft? Is it really that tough to install the panel if you've done this already? I won't be able to move on if i don't rivet it on, but I don't want to hose myself. > > also, in this section, you're supposed to rivet on some hinges for the cowl. I'm using camlocs, but I haven't received them yet. should I just leave the rivets out of the firewall flange for now? I'm kinda lost here... it seems like you need the engine on before you can mount the camlocs right? or do you mount the receptacles now, and do the rest when you're doing the cowl? what the heck? > > thanks in advance! > > cj > #40410 > (con)fuse(d) > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 02, 2007
From: Les Kearney <kearney(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: New Design Brake Pedals and Stainless Brake Lines
I would be interested, Les Kearney RV10 # 40643 - Lost in the empennage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Sipp" <rsipp(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: New Chelton EFIS un-official support group page
Date: Jan 02, 2007
Thanks for the forum work Tim. I tried to et D2A to sponsor one some time ago. Under the current circumstances the independent format is much better. Have had a couple of email/phone exchanges with Chelton, they appear to be in the customer status data collection mode. Certainly a better response than that first caustic lawyer type message. I have everything accept the ADHARS, my units shipped soon after D2A decided to go with the Pinpoint. Dick Sipp ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net>
Subject: Re: New Design Brake Pedals and Stainless Brake Lines
Date: Jan 03, 2007
Dave, I'm interested. I assume if I receive it and it's not what I thought it would be I would be able to return it. Wayne Edgerton 40336 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Russell Daves" <dav1111(at)cox.net>
Subject: Wheel Pant Spacer Bolts Breaking
Date: Jan 03, 2007
As I previously posted, my right main gear leg bolt, AN6A where it goes into U1004B extension (page 46-5 figure 2) broke off and the landings have not been hard at all. Since then my left bolt also broke with resulting significant damage to the wheel pant. I had thought the problem with the bolts breaking was probably a vibration issue, and after the second bolt break I consulted with another RV builder, A&P, and Machinist and we both decided that the problem was that the Van's supplied U1004B extension spacer was not big around enough where it bolted onto the axle hub nut and the large wheel pant was experiencing some in flight vibration causing the U1004B to flex up and down ever so slightly against the axle hub nut resulting in a stress fatigue fracture of the AN6A bolt even with the attachment point of the U1004B to the axle hub nut. We redesigned the U1004B extension spacer so that where it butted against the axle hub nut and the large washer fiberglassed into the wheel pant could not flex up and down. Pictures of the Van's supplied U1004B extension spacer (top) and the newly designed spacer (bottom) can be viewed at: http://img505.imageshack.us/my.php?image=wheelpantspacer3bz6.png In addition I also posted a picture of the new extension spacer mounted on the wheel at: http://img505.imageshack.us/my.php?image=wheelpantspacermountedrl3.png Best regards, Russ Daves N710RV - First Flight 7/28/06 - 95+ hours N65RV - RV-6A Sold RV-8 under construction ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GRANSCOTT(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 03, 2007
Subject: Re: ELT? 406 vs 121.5
Effective Jan 1 07 boaters are no longer authorized to use 121.5 beacons; this should take down the amount of false beacon reports...but I'm sure many boaters will continue to turn on their beacon accidentally and many will continue to be 121.5... Eric, even if the beacon is located near an airport, AFRCC does not ignore it, they will call the local airport owner/tower etc., and also the local CAP ES officer to investigate after two rotations...been on a number of these false beacons in parked aircraft, one was on the local hospital helo pad--hard landing set it off and it was so foggy the crew could not get back to base but we got called out and found the hot ELT... AFRCC does not know if the plane/boat/personal EPRB is in a hangar, driveway, tied down or just crashed near the airport. Please keep in mind that most off field landing happen within 5 nm radius of airports. With the accuracy of the current 121.5 system and even the newer GPS units investigations will continue to be called but hopefully with a little more accuracy. Also keep in mind that many ELT's do not activate due to a number of reasons after an impact..poor power, antenna crushed, etc. So continue to file before your flights or at least let someone know you're flying and where you're headed incase you become over due. P ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: You are a experimental airplane builder if.
Date: Jan 03, 2007
From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com>
Just came across this on another list, had to share it. You're an experimental airplane builder if... - You have ever had a conversation involving the words "mil-spec" and "AN." - The majority of your tools aren't available at Sears. - You always have fresh scars on your hands, even though you have a desk job. - People ask if you have a hobby and their follow up question is "are you nuts?" - You have at least 15 unfinished projects that aren't airplanes. - Your first reaction when purchasing any non-food item is "I can build that." - Your first reaction when purchasing any food item is "I gotta get some beer to go with that." - You know what Oshkosh is and where to find it. - You know that Alodine is not a place in Texas. - Someone says "hey look a Moose" and you look up in the sky. - You can't look at anything mechanical without thinking of a way to "improve" the design. - Cleveland is a brand, not a place in Ohio. - You'll pay hundreds of dollars to save two pounds in avionics, but you're 20 lbs overweight and somehow that's OK. - When people ask what you got for Christmas you have to explain what it is. - A dragon fly isn't an insect. - You know who Burt Rutan is and you think sideburns are kinda cool. - A lay up has nothing to do with basketball. - You haven't parked your car in your garage in years. Jack Phillips _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilege d, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it i n error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 03, 2007
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Oil Cooler Bracket
Jesse, I received mine recently and the scat tube ring is attached and it's not riveted but welded (tack) to the oil cooler bracket. Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ Mounting engine today !!!!!!! Jesse Saint wrote: > I have a question for those who have received FWF kits recently. In > the attached picture you can see the oil cooler bracket that I am > working on. Notice anything missing? Vans sent this to me, but it > doesnt have the flange for the scat tube. Is it possible that they > have modified the plans and we are supposed to rivet on a flange like > goes on the baffles? In the past it had the flange welded to the bracket. > > Anybody else seen this? I am going to call Vans, but they havent > opened yet. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Gonzalez" <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com>
Subject: Battery wiring
Date: Jan 03, 2007
Can anyone that is near completion or has completed the plane tell me were the battery cable goes once it is infront of the front seats. Does the cable stay along the side and avoid interfering with the rudder pedals and goes up into the upper consol or do they drop below into the space between the real floor and the floor beneath the pedals/ Thanks John G ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 03, 2007
From: Eric Panning <ericmpmail-rv10(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: ELT? 406 vs 121.5
Hi, Thanks for the info. Do you have more details or a story of an off airport ELT at a crash site? I suspect many are interested in the process. I recall the numbers were 94% airports and ~ 3% for boats, etc. Marine ELT's don't have a shock sensor so I suspect the false rate is lower as a result. Didn't know about the expiration date for Marine, thanks. How long for 2 rotations? I'm sorry if I implied that a search would not be instigated for an ELT near an airport. It does sound like it would take awhile to spin up a full search unless they had more specific info (like flight plan, or ground report of crash, overdue, etc). Have you taken part in any 406 ELT searches? Is the procedure different? Thanks! Eric --- GRANSCOTT(at)aol.com wrote: > Effective Jan 1 07 boaters are no longer authorized > to use 121.5 beacons; > this should take down the amount of false beacon > reports...but I'm sure many > boaters will continue to turn on their beacon > accidentally and many will > continue to be 121.5... > > Eric, even if the beacon is located near an airport, > AFRCC does not ignore > it, they will call the local airport owner/tower > etc., and also the local CAP > ES officer to investigate after two > rotations...been on a number of these > false beacons in parked aircraft, one was on the > local hospital helo pad--hard > landing set it off and it was so foggy the crew > could not get back to base but > we got called out and found the hot ELT... AFRCC > does not know if the > plane/boat/personal EPRB is in a hangar, driveway, > tied down or just crashed near > the airport. > > Please keep in mind that most off field landing > happen within 5 nm radius of > airports. With the accuracy of the current 121.5 > system and even the newer > GPS units investigations will continue to be called > but hopefully with a > little more accuracy. Also keep in mind that many > ELT's do not activate due to a > number of reasons after an impact..poor power, > antenna crushed, etc. So > continue to file before your flights or at least let > someone know you're flying > and where you're headed incase you become over due. > > P > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Reining" <wreining(at)gmail.com>
Subject: When Do the Pieces Come Together?
Date: Jan 03, 2007
I am about to build a workshop and need to know how big to make it. Due to hillside property constraints, it will be long and narrow, with the doors on the long side. If I'm not careful, I may not be able to get the fuselage back out again, once assembled. I guess I could sit down and read the plans from one end to the other, but thought the forum might produce answers more quickly, so here goes: Once all the individual "pieces" are assembled (e.g. vertical stab, horiz. stab. rudder, elevator, tail cone, wings, fuselage), in what order are they attached to one another? I assume the tail cone gets attached to the fuselage fairly soon, and then the cabin top, landing gear and engine. Obviously the wings aren't attached until you are practically at the airport, but when must the vertical & horizontal stab and elevators be attached? Please understand the purpose of these questions is to maximize work performed inside, while still being able to get the finished contraption out the door (which will probably be a removable wall of the shop). Bill Reining (with my son Jon) 40514 (tail cone) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dave Hertner" <effectus(at)rogers.com>
Subject: Re: New Design Brake Pedals and Stainless Brake Lines
Date: Jan 03, 2007
Wayne, The customer has to be happy or there is no point in offering it for sale. Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: Wayne Edgerton To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 8:10 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: New Design Brake Pedals and Stainless Brake Lines Dave, I'm interested. I assume if I receive it and it's not what I thought it would be I would be able to return it. Wayne Edgerton 40336 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- 03/01/2007 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 03, 2007
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Subject: Re: When Do the Pieces Come Together?
Bill, I don't think it's really too big a worry for you. The reason being that you really don't need to do any permanent assembly of the "winged" parts until you're ready for final assembly. You will want to test fit the wings and drill the rear spar and stuff like that, but that's only maybe 2 hours max...and you can pull it outside for that amount of time. Assembling the tail you put on the HS, VS, Elevators, and Rudder, basically in that order. You don't need to do much with them until final assembly again though. At most, just a quick assembly of the HS and VS so you can do the intersection fairing for a couple hours. So, just plan to build all the parts and not do much with them until you have to. The tailcone to fuselage is a little sooner than the others, as you've noticed. But, if you have a long area, then you're fine. If you have 20' x 6', you could in theory work on the fuse with tailcone. More than that and you're good to go. Push it to 22' or 23' long when you get the engine on and you're still fine. The hardest part, as you've noticed, is getting it out the door, if it's on the side of the shop. You may end up even busting a wall unless you can put a hole in one end of the building. Other than that, you probably will have no problem. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying Bill Reining wrote: > I am about to build a workshop and need to know how big to make it. Due > to hillside property constraints, it will be long and narrow, with the > doors on the long side. If Im not careful, I may not be able to get > the fuselage back out again, once assembled. I guess I could sit down > and read the plans from one end to the other, but thought the forum > might produce answers more quickly, so here goes: > > > > Once all the individual pieces are assembled (e.g. vertical stab, > horiz. stab. rudder, elevator, tail cone, wings, fuselage), in what > order are they attached to one another? I assume the tail cone gets > attached to the fuselage fairly soon, and then the cabin top, landing > gear and engine. Obviously the wings arent attached until you are > practically at the airport, but when must the vertical & horizontal stab > and elevators be attached? Please understand the purpose of these > questions is to maximize work performed inside, while still being able > to get the finished contraption out the door (which will probably be a > removable wall of the shop). > > > > Bill Reining (with my son Jon) > > 40514 (tail cone) > > * > > > * ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "gary" <speckter(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Avionics Escrow
Date: Jan 03, 2007
In light of the recent Chelton/Direct to Avionics mess and past kit manufactures bankrupsies, I called AOPA Escrow services and inquired about them holding funds until the avionics manufacture delivered. They can do that for any builder who doesn't want to send money direct. The rules of when the money is dispersed is negotiated between the parties before any money is sent. Looks like good protection for those who want it. Gary 40274 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 03, 2007
From: jerry petersen <bldanrv9a(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: When Do the Pieces Come Together?
We built ours in my oversized single stall garage. Rough dimensions were 13X26 ft with a 10X10 ft work area in the front. The door is 8ft by 6'6" high. We kept the fuselage on temporary gear for as long as we could and had to slide it out the door with the main wheels off. Many pieces were fitted and then removed to be reinstalled later. For example we used a nice summer day to push the tail out the door to mount the VS and HS. Final assembly is taking place in a hangar at the airport. We have pictures if you have a specific question I could answer. Jerry Petersen 40373 --- Bill Reining wrote: > I am about to build a workshop and need to know how > big to make it. Due to > hillside property constraints, it will be long and > narrow, with the doors on > the long side. If I'm not careful, I may not be > able to get the fuselage > back out again, once assembled. I guess I could sit > down and read the plans > from one end to the other, but thought the forum > might produce answers more > quickly, so here goes: > > > > Once all the individual "pieces" are assembled (e.g. > vertical stab, horiz. > stab. rudder, elevator, tail cone, wings, fuselage), > in what order are they > attached to one another? I assume the tail cone > gets attached to the > fuselage fairly soon, and then the cabin top, > landing gear and engine. > Obviously the wings aren't attached until you are > practically at the > airport, but when must the vertical & horizontal > stab and elevators be > attached? Please understand the purpose of these > questions is to maximize > work performed inside, while still being able to get > the finished > contraption out the door (which will probably be a > removable wall of the > shop). > > > > Bill Reining (with my son Jon) > > 40514 (tail cone) > > __________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 03, 2007
From: jerry petersen <bldanrv9a(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Installing elevators and rudders
We made similar pins with just a simple 90 degree bend. We found ourselves using them often for other alignments as well. Jerry Petersen 40373 --- Wayne Edgerton wrote: > I am just finishing up installing my elevators and > rudder and a fellow RV10 builder, Ron Grover, on the > field where I'm at, Prop Wash Justin, TX, gave me a > great tip and the loan of his tool that really made > the job much easer. Actually Ron came over and help > me install the elevators. Boy it's really nice to > have someone help you that's done something before > you. Ron has a beautiful RV8 he built and is working > on his 10. > > Anyway the tool that Ron loaned me, see attachment > 1-2-07-1, is for inserting temporarily in the attach > brackets to hold the elevator or the rudder in place > until you can get the bolt installed. I just put my > hand in the picture as a reference to their size I > can't remember off hand but I think he said he got > them at Aircraft Spruce?. I've also attached a photo > of them installed on the rudder if you're able to > zoom in a little to see them.Probably everyone > already knows about these tools except me :>} I've > also attached the finished product 1-2-07-2. It > obviously works the same way on the elevators. > > I've now got the elevators and rudder generally > installed I just need to make the final touches. > > For what ever it's worth > > Wayne Edgerton #40336 > > Trying to get this thing finished and start flying > if the vendors will just start co-operating :>} > Props been delayed AGAIN __________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 03, 2007
From: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: When Do the Pieces Come Together?
Jerry, Because or support columns in my 3 car garage, I will need to reorient my fuselage to sit in one of the car bays. It is only 20 feet long, so I will need to build a temporary extension. I was hoping to extend it by 4 feet. Making it 24 feet long.. Would 24' give me enough length to mount the engine, prop, and spinner onto the fuse (everything less wings, vertical stab and horizontal stab) and still be able to walk around the front? Larry Rosen #356 jerry petersen wrote: > > We built ours in my oversized single stall garage. > Rough dimensions were 13X26 ft with a 10X10 ft work > area in the front. The door is 8ft by 6'6" high. We > kept the fuselage on temporary gear for as long as we > could and had to slide it out the door with the main > wheels off. Many pieces were fitted and then removed > to be reinstalled later. For example we used a nice > summer day to push the tail out the door to mount the > VS and HS. Final assembly is taking place in a hangar > at the airport. We have pictures if you have a > specific question I could answer. > > Jerry Petersen > 40373 > --- Bill Reining wrote: > > >> I am about to build a workshop and need to know how >> big to make it. Due to >> hillside property constraints, it will be long and >> narrow, with the doors on >> the long side. If I'm not careful, I may not be >> able to get the fuselage >> back out again, once assembled. I guess I could sit >> down and read the plans >> from one end to the other, but thought the forum >> might produce answers more >> quickly, so here goes: >> >> >> >> Once all the individual "pieces" are assembled (e.g. >> vertical stab, horiz. >> stab. rudder, elevator, tail cone, wings, fuselage), >> in what order are they >> attached to one another? I assume the tail cone >> gets attached to the >> fuselage fairly soon, and then the cabin top, >> landing gear and engine. >> Obviously the wings aren't attached until you are >> practically at the >> airport, but when must the vertical & horizontal >> stab and elevators be >> attached? Please understand the purpose of these >> questions is to maximize >> work performed inside, while still being able to get >> the finished >> contraption out the door (which will probably be a >> removable wall of the >> shop). >> >> >> >> Bill Reining (with my son Jon) >> >> 40514 (tail cone) >> >> >> > > > __________________________________________________ > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Russell Daves" <dav1111(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Wheel Pant Spacer Bolts BreakingWheel Pant Spacer Bolts
Breaking
Date: Jan 04, 2007
Flat part in the middle is a wrench slot to tighten up the AN-6A bolt with the axle nut. Russ Daves ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net>
Subject: Re: Installing elevators and rudders
Date: Jan 04, 2007
Hi Jon, I purchased Accuracy Avionics overhead console for air and lights and this will be the air intake for the console. I've sent all of my build photos over to Tony at Accuracy Avionics http://www.accuracyavionics.com/v1/index.html and he said he will be posting them on his web site. If he doesn't, if anyone would like to see what I did, I can gladly forward them some photos. We'll see how well it works when I get into the air. It should work really well, in theory :>} Wayne Edgerton # 40336 starting instrument panel install today ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: Panel planning
Date: Jan 04, 2007
Don't know whether this has been posted here before but food for thought. Plan some backup for glass. http://www.alexisparkinn.com/nwpilot's_tranatlantic_flight.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Wheel Pant Spacer Bolts BreakingWheel Pant Spacer Bolts
Breaking
Date: Jan 04, 2007
From: "Scott Schmidt" <sschmidt(at)ussynthetic.com>
Are you going to make these available to purchase? Scott Schmidt sschmidt(at)ussynthetic.com ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Russell Daves Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 4:24 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Wheel Pant Spacer Bolts BreakingWheel Pant Spacer Bolts Breaking Flat part in the middle is a wrench slot to tighten up the AN-6A bolt with the axle nut. Russ Daves ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <gorejr(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Front rim issue
Date: Jan 04, 2007
I recall a while back someone recommended sending the unused front rim to a company and they would send the correct one in replacement for a fee. Could someone please refresh my memory on this issue? Thanks again for all of your support!!! Jim ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ddddsp1(at)juno.com" <ddddsp1(at)juno.com>
Date: Jan 04, 2007
Subject: Seeking sales position
After seeing the success Deems had getting results with the CONTACTS on this list I thought I would give it a shot myself. After 13 years selling Pharmaceuticals for Johnson & Johnson I was laid off last week in a RIF (reduction in force). If anyone is hiring Distri ct, Regional, or National Sales Reps I would love to talk to you about t he opportunity. I also have 6 years of Sales Management. Looking prefe rably in the Central Plains/Midwest but willl look at all opportunities. Why not, with an RV10 I can travel if I need too! I enjoy selling and hope to find another position in outside sales. If your company is looking or you know of successful companies that are se ekings sales reps I would certainly appreciate the tip. Thanks, DEAN SOMBKE 40449 ________________________________________________________________________ FREE for 30 Days! - Holiday eCards from AmericanGreetings.com http://track.juno.com/s/lc?s=197335&u=http://www.americangreetings.c om/index.pd?c=uol5637

After seeing the success Deems had getting results with the CON TACTS on this list I thought I would give it a shot myself.

After 13 years selling Pharmaceuticals for Johnson & Johnson I wa s laid off last week in a RIF (reduction in force).  If anyone is h iring District, Regional, or National Sales Reps I would love to talk to you about the opportunity.  I also have 6 years of Sales Managemen t.  Looking preferably in the Central Plains/Midwest but willl look at all opportunities.  Why not, with an RV10 I can travel if I nee d too!

I enjoy selling and hope to find another position in outside sales.&n bsp;  If your company is looking or you know of successful companie s that are seekings sales reps I would certainly appreciate the tip.&nbs p;

Thanks,

DEAN SOMBKE

40449



______________________ __________________________________________________
FREE for 30 Days! - Holiday e Cards from AmericanGreetings.com
Click HERE and start sending today!


      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 04, 2007
From: "Kelly McMullen" <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: is: HP listens ... was: Bad Day At Blackrock - what's wrong
with Customer service? So do dental drills handle #30 & #40 drill bits? Does the water reduce the burring? On 1/4/07, John Gonzalez wrote: > > I can read it, I can write it...this is exactly the way people sound when > their mouths are filled with water, my drill, the suction or their spit. > > Deems, my ear is always here for you. > > You mean guys! > > Damm, I hope I didn't miss the joke--was it on me? My spelling sucks! > > John G. > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Front rim issue
Date: Jan 04, 2007
From: "Condrey, Bob (US SSA)" <bob.condrey(at)baesystems.com>
There were several posts on this. I did this but there were several before me. If you contact Matco directly they will take care of you. Cost to exchange depends on condition of your current stock wheel. If it was never mounted, etc. the fee is small. They will also sell you the correct one outright if you desire. I will say that the new one has MUCH better clearance. If you do a search of the archives on "Matco" you'll probably find a lot more detail. Bob #40105 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of gorejr(at)bellsouth.net Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 12:07 PM Subject: RV10-List: Front rim issue I recall a while back someone recommended sending the unused front rim to a company and they would send the correct one in replacement for a fee. Could someone please refresh my memory on this issue? Thanks again for all of your support!!! Jim ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Gonzalez" <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: is: HP listens ... was: Bad Day At Blackrock - what's wrong
with Customer service?
Date: Jan 04, 2007
The dental drill turns at between 300,000 to 500,000 rpm so there is no need for deburring because any remnands from the cut are across the room against the wall or in my hair. #30 and #40 bits are a (bit) rough for the job, but in a pinch they might work. John G >From: "Kelly McMullen" <apilot2(at)gmail.com> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV10-List: is: HP listens ... was: Bad Day At Blackrock - >what's wrong with Customer service? >Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 11:41:23 -0700 > > >So do dental drills handle #30 & #40 drill bits? >Does the water reduce the burring? > >On 1/4/07, John Gonzalez wrote: >> >>I can read it, I can write it...this is exactly the way people sound when >>their mouths are filled with water, my drill, the suction or their spit. >> >>Deems, my ear is always here for you. >> >>You mean guys! >> >>Damm, I hope I didn't miss the joke--was it on me? My spelling sucks! >> >>John G. >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 04, 2007
From: Niko <owl40188(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Panel planning
Interesting,=0A=0AMy IFR instructor claims that the EFIS in the Cirrus he w as flying died while he was in the soup. If flying IFR backups are a must. =0A=0ANiko=0A40188=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: David McNeil l =0ATo: rv10-list(at)matronics.com=0ASent: Thursday, Januar y 4, 2007 7:53:26 AM=0ASubject: RV10-List: Panel planning=0A=0A=0ADon't kno w whether this has been posted here before but food for thought. Plan some backup for glass.=0A =0Ahttp://www.alexisparkinn.com/nwpilot's_tranatlantic ==== ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 04, 2007
From: Werner Schneider <glastar(at)gmx.net>
Subject: Re: Panel planning
Backup yes, but risk can be mitigated with a few things: -have some redundancy in power distribution, no single point should take out the whole system -have not all systems relaying on one vendor only, diff. hardware and software can be risk mitigation too -never rely on marketing hype, thoroughly test your systems for reliability Werner (all glass however VFR only so far) David McNeill wrote: > Don't know whether this has been posted here before but food for > thought. Plan some backup for glass. > > http://www.alexisparkinn.com/nwpilot's_tranatlantic_flight.htm > <http://www.alexisparkinn.com/nwpilot%27s_tranatlantic_flight.htm> > >* > > >* > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 04, 2007
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: is: Bad Day At Blackrock - Score at the end of 2 innings
- vendors 2, Deems 0 I think I need to take a vacation. 1st off, Judy is enjoying her new electro whizzy Gateway PC. :-* The Fed Ex driver rings the bell @ 12:30 pm, Ah Ha thats the CORRECT parts from Van's :-) Sure enough the sender on the label is Van's! A call goes out to John Ackerman, who is still in town " There here !" :-D "I'll be right over" says John. John arrives moments later After wiping salad dressing off my face, we head out to the shop eagerly anticipating the BIG MOMENT. 8-) We cut open the overnight box ............. Out drops 4 (count them four) sets of IO 540 engine bolts,nuts, and washers ? ? ? ? ? ? =-O Long pause ....... Blood pressure rises >:o Take a deep breath >:o >:o Blood pressure continues to rise >:o >:o >:o >:o Check the invoice ...... yep the invoice has the right Van's part description/number (EA DYNA VI IO-540 VIB ISO RV-10 Only) But the contents are 4 sets of (EA DYNA BOLT IO-540) commonly known as 'the bolt kit'. !#@$"*^%^&#@&^$%^&%_^$&&^##@*%(^%^___%(#@@^%*(^&@J@!$@^!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( ............ Well another call to Van's, after Ron politely listened to my diatribe, he promised to personally follow-up and pick/fill the order himself and to investigate why this problem was reoccurring! 15-20 minutes later I got a call back from Ron (NICE TOUCH!) who updated me on the status, promised to priority overnight them This time at their expense (last time I PAID!). He also followed up to determine where their process had broken down so that they could fix the root problem. Judy's gone shopping, when she gets back I'm going to take her to a movie (hopefully a comedy!) Tomorrow is another day Let's see what adventure that brings Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Van's shipping department, where did everyone go??
From: Michael D Chase <MChase(at)gdatp.com>
Date: Jan 04, 2007
Dave, What is Van's quoting for a lead time on the "standard" build wing kit these days. I am hoping to be done with my elevators this week and will be starting the "tunnel". Anyone have an hours estimate for finishing the tail cone so I can plan my ordering lead time? Michael Chase General Dynamics Armament and Technical Products 802-657-6029 Office 802-922-5930 Cell mchase(at)gdatp.com This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is private, confidential, or exempt from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, copying, printing, disclosure, retention, or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply to this e-mail, and delete all copies without disclosing this message to others. Thank you. "Dave Leikam" Sent by: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com 12/22/2006 05:02 PM Please respond to rv10-list To: cc: Subject: Re: RV10-List: Van's shipping department, where did everyone go?? I just confirmed my order for QB wings, fuse, and finishing kit today. Told the kits should be ready to ship late Feb. to mid March. I was told as of today there are 688 RV-10s being built. I ordered parts for a new right trim tab on 12/20. Parts came today Fed Ex. I was told they wouldn't arrive till after Xmas. Shipping is a bit high I guess, $24.83 to Milwaukee, WI (roughly). But I guess I can never complain about getting something delivered across the country in two days for $25.00. The game is to try not to have to many odds and ends shipped in between major orders. I am one who thinks the USPS should just raise their stamp rate to .50 and get it over with for a while. Never had a problem with anything from Van's yet. Still waiting on Creativeair lights since 12/12 though. Dave Leikam 40496 tail assembly ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Gonzalez" <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com> Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 2:08 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Van's shipping department, where did everyone go?? > > > Just because you guys request overnight or two day shipping does not bump > it up in the order department at Van's > > As Tim Olson and several others can attest too, including me, be very > reluctant to ship anything overnight or even two day. You will be blown > away by how much it costs. And absolutely, never get anything for Saturday > delivery. > > $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > Try it out or take my word for it...don't do it. > > John G > >>From: MauleDriver <MauleDriver(at)nc.rr.com> >>Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >>To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >>Subject: Re: RV10-List: Van's shipping department, where did everyone go?? >>Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 14:36:26 -0500 >> >> >>I think I'm experiencing that now. I ordered some parts Monday, it showed >>up on the "ship list" on Tuesday (that's good). But it's not in UPS's >>tracking system yet (which happens within minutes of actual pickup). I'm >>concluding that "ship list" means, "ordered rec'd and sent for >>picking/packing". >> >>The aircraft are so good, the kits so well engineered, and the overall >>experience so wonderful that I'm fine with Van's core compentencies being >>over in the design and engineering area. Receiving, picking, packing and >>otherwise processing parts orders is important for Amazon. I sense that >>suppling parts and accessories is a merely a requirement for Vans being >>in this business. >> >>Remember when it took 'everyone' 3 days to process an order for anything? >>Ship overnight? forgetaboutit! >> >>Bill "deburr, dimple, deburr, dimple, deburr dimple the tailcone" Watson >> >>Brian Douglas wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>Yeah, I've had similar experiences. One time after I got the "your order >>>has already shipped so we can't add to it" answer, my wife called FedEx >>>to confirm that (if you knew her this would make sense). Turns out FedEx >>>hadn't shown up at Vans yet so she called them on it and insisted they >>>add to my existing order. Most recently I ordered a replacement F-1010 >>>bulkhead 1st thing monday morning, only to have it shipped the following >>>Friday. >>> >>>Vans makes a tremendous product but I'd say the Marketing and Customer >>>Service deptments are somewhat subpar. Oh well. I think from now on, >>>I'll just plan to pay extra for the 2 day shipping to avoid extended >>>buildus interruptus. >>> >>>Just my $.02 >>> >>>-Brian >>> >>>Iowa City, IA >>>#40497 >>>Tailcone rivets this weekend! >>> >>>----- Original Message ----- From: "John Gonzalez" >>> >>>To: >>>Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 7:59 PM >>>Subject: RV10-List: Van's shipping department, where did everyone go?? >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>The last couple of times I have orderred parts through Van's I have been >>>>dissappointed in how long it took to get my stuff. >>>> >>>>Last Friday I orderred some accessories over the phone, just three or >>>>four and asked for standard UPS ground delivery. >>>> >>>>The following Monday morning, two and a half days later, I called to add >>>>a few small items, rivets and nuts. I was told that there was no way to >>>>include these items in my previous order so that shipping could be all >>>>together, no interest what so ever in even checking the status of my >>>>Friday order. >>>> >>>>Today I got a UPS confirmation that UPS received a package for shipment >>>>to me from Van's. For one week the order is sitting in Van's being >>>>filled before it even gets in the mail. So much for getting anything >>>>done on what I need to get done during this holiday weekend. >>>> >>>>Very frustrating and not the first time. >>>> >>>>I know that Aircraft, Spruce and Specialty has a west coast location, >>>>but i order through them anytime before 3pm and the next day it is >>>>sitting in my office. EVERYTIME! >>>> >>>>Just venting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>>> >>>>I always try to not order the small stuff through Van's for this very >>>>reason. EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!! >>>> >>>>John G. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: John Ackerman <johnag5b(at)cableone.net>
Date: Jan 04, 2007
Subject: (No subject header)
Actually, only two at-bats, Deems! We could still pull this inning out. Maybe-just maybe- the pan will even clear the engine mount! >I got a call back from Ron (NICE TOUCH!) I agree! Now about D2A... John Ackerman On Jan 4, 2007, at 2:46 PM, Deems Davis wrote: I think I need to take a vacation. 1st off, Judy is enjoying her new electro whizzy Gateway PC. :-* The Fed Ex driver rings the bell @ 12:30 pm, Ah Ha thats the CORRECT parts from Van's :-) Sure enough the sender on the label is Van's! A call goes out to John Ackerman, who is still in town " There here !" :-D "I'll be right over" says John. John arrives moments later After wiping salad dressing off my face, we head out to the shop eagerly anticipating the BIG MOMENT. 8-) We cut open the overnight box ............. Out drops 4 (count them four) sets of IO 540 engine bolts,nuts, and washers ? ? ? ? ? ? =-O Long pause ....... Blood pressure rises >:o Take a deep breath >:o >:o Blood pressure continues to rise >:o >:o >:o >:o Check the invoice ...... yep the invoice has the right Van's part description/number (EA DYNA VI IO-540 VIB ISO RV-10 Only) But the contents are 4 sets of (EA DYNA BOLT IO-540) commonly known as 'the bolt kit'. !#@$"*^%^&#@&^$%^&%_^$&&^##@*%(^%^___%(#@@^%*(^&@J@!$@^!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( ............ ---- Msg sent via CableONE.net MyMail - http://www.cableone.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 04, 2007
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Bad Day At Blackrock - what's wrong with Customer service?
Allen, Sorry about the dig @ Sooners, that was one amazing football game! When I talked to Gary Foster today, he said that you ground down the ridges/fins on the sump to provide extra room for the potential interference with the engine mount on the RV-10. I noticed mine didn't seem to be ground down. I ordered my engine mount from Van's well AFTER the problem was reported, BUT, when we had the engine up close and personal the other day (with the wrong mounts) it looked like it was going to be VERY tight. Once I finally get mounts that I can use I'll try again (tomorrow?) I'll let you know the outcome. I also spoke w/ Will James and Gary about induction/filtered air, Gary hasn't done anything so far and Will say's he woke up one morning @ 3am with a flash of inspiration and had a design worked out. I'm trying to encourage him to go ahead and follow up, any encouragement you can provide would be welcome. Gary has been very helpful, but he's getting to the point where he wants to finish and fly and not be in a builder support role. Deems ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Gonzalez" <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: is: Bad Day At Blackrock - Score at the end of 2 innings
- vendors 2, Deems 0
Date: Jan 04, 2007
May I recommend the Movie, "Stranger Than Fiction" A good movie for the two of you. >From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV10-List: is: Bad Day At Blackrock - Score at the end of 2 >innings - vendors 2, Deems 0 >Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 14:46:55 -0700 > > >I think I need to take a vacation. > >1st off, Judy is enjoying her new electro whizzy Gateway PC. :-* > >The Fed Ex driver rings the bell @ 12:30 pm, Ah Ha thats the CORRECT parts >from Van's :-) >Sure enough the sender on the label is Van's! A call goes out to John >Ackerman, who is still in town >" There here !" :-D >"I'll be right over" says John. >John arrives moments later >After wiping salad dressing off my face, we head out to the shop eagerly >anticipating the BIG MOMENT. 8-) >We cut open the overnight box >............. >Out drops 4 (count them four) sets of IO 540 engine bolts,nuts, and washers >? ? ? ? ? ? =-O >Long pause ....... >Blood pressure rises >:o >Take a deep breath >:o >:o >Blood pressure continues to rise >:o >:o >:o >:o >Check the invoice ...... yep the invoice has the right Van's part >description/number (EA DYNA VI IO-540 VIB ISO RV-10 Only) But the contents >are 4 sets of (EA DYNA BOLT IO-540) commonly known as 'the bolt kit'. >!#@$"*^%^&#@&^$%^&%_^$&&^##@*%(^%^___%(#@@^%*(^&@J@!$@^!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >:'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( ............ > >Well another call to Van's, after Ron politely listened to my diatribe, he >promised to personally follow-up and pick/fill the order himself and to >investigate why this problem was reoccurring! 15-20 minutes later I got a >call back from Ron (NICE TOUCH!) who updated me on the status, promised to >priority overnight them This time at their expense (last time I PAID!). He >also followed up to determine where their process had broken down so that >they could fix the root problem. > >Judy's gone shopping, when she gets back I'm going to take her to a movie >(hopefully a comedy!) > > >Tomorrow is another day > >Let's see what adventure that brings > >Deems Davis # 406 >Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Bad Day At Blackrock - what's wrong with Customer service?
Date: Jan 04, 2007
From: "BPA" <BPA(at)bpaengines.com>
Since this was brought up, when we built Jim Younkins IO-540 for his -10, his assistant found the same problem. So, we ground down the fins on the sump. This was about the same time we built Gary's engine. In the meantime, someone on the list found the interference with the standard C4B5-D4A5 sump as well and it was determined to be an issue with the mount itself. If I'm not mistaken, the issue of the mount has been resolved. But if there is a fit issue with the sump on any of the engines we have put CAS on, let me know so we can address. Does anyone have an inside to Van's to verify if a correction has been made to the mount? Hey Deems, I loved the ball game!!!! GO POKES!!!!! Allen -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 4:53 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Bad Day At Blackrock - what's wrong with Customer service? Allen, Sorry about the dig @ Sooners, that was one amazing football game! When I talked to Gary Foster today, he said that you ground down the ridges/fins on the sump to provide extra room for the potential interference with the engine mount on the RV-10. I noticed mine didn't seem to be ground down. I ordered my engine mount from Van's well AFTER the problem was reported, BUT, when we had the engine up close and personal the other day (with the wrong mounts) it looked like it was going to be VERY tight. Once I finally get mounts that I can use I'll try again (tomorrow?) I'll let you know the outcome. I also spoke w/ Will James and Gary about induction/filtered air, Gary hasn't done anything so far and Will say's he woke up one morning @ 3am with a flash of inspiration and had a design worked out. I'm trying to encourage him to go ahead and follow up, any encouragement you can provide would be welcome. Gary has been very helpful, but he's getting to the point where he wants to finish and fly and not be in a builder support role. Deems ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 04, 2007
From: rv10builder <rv10builder(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Wheel Pant Spacer Bolts BreakingWheel Pant Spacer Bolts
Breaking I second, /"When /are you going to make these available to purchase?" Brian #40308 Scott Schmidt wrote: > > Are you going to make these available to purchase? > > > > Scott Schmidt > > sschmidt(at)ussynthetic.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Russell Daves > *Sent:* Thursday, January 04, 2007 4:24 AM > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* Re: RV10-List: Wheel Pant Spacer Bolts BreakingWheel Pant > Spacer Bolts Breaking > > > > Flat part in the middle is a wrench slot to tighten up the AN-6A bolt > with the axle nut. > > > > Russ Daves > > * * > * * > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > * * > * > > > * ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rob Wright" <armywrights(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Front rim issue
Date: Jan 04, 2007
----=_NextPart_000_0049_01C7302D.550B3D50 ----=_NextPart_000_004D_01C7302D.550D8740 ----=_NextPart_000_0051_01C7302D.550D8740 ----=_NextPart_000_0055_01C7302D.550FF840 ----=_NextPart_000_0059_01C7302D.55126940-- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rob Wright" <armywrights(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: MATCO wheel
Date: Jan 04, 2007
I remember it also cost about $18.60 plus shipping. My Vans part was never unwrapped from the cellophane. I called, had them send the new one (complete assembly), and then sent theirs back to them (complete assembly). The boxes passed each other in the mail, I only paid the above amounts, and they took care of crediting my account, so I ended up with a zero balance. I've only done this since Christmas. The lady I talked to knew exactly what I meant when I said I needed the RV-10 nosewheel exchange and did the rest for me. Seems like they're getting pretty good at this. Rob Wright #392 Fuse ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rob Wright" <armywrights(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Nosewheel rim
Date: Jan 04, 2007
List stripped my attachments so here goes: search the archives for these subjects: Nose Wheel Valve Clearance Solution And Matco Contact You'll come up with at least 6 threads. Rob Wright #392 fuse ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Fixitauto(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 04, 2007
Subject: Re: Bad Day At Blackrock - OOPS
Anybody else out there missing James? Roger 40079 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Bad Day At Blackrock - OOPS
Date: Jan 04, 2007
From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com>
McClow was a valued institution before his wife put the skids on his live video performances. John 40600 ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com on behalf of Fixitauto(at)aol.com Sent: Thu 1/4/2007 5:34 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Bad Day At Blackrock - OOPS Anybody else out there missing James? Roger 40079 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: cloudvalley(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: Seeking sales position
Date: Jan 05, 2007
Hello! It's a small world. My wife and I both worked for J&J doing medical research in the La Jolla facility. We were told they were going to close the building. We were laid off with lots of other researchers there in 1994 and replaced with Chinese lower paid ones, using the H1-B visa program in a creative way. They built a new very large posh west-coast showcase research building instead of closing. We feel for you. Wish you luck. We have just started our empennage kit for our RV-10. Brian and Ruth Preston #40666 -------------- Original message -------------- From: "ddddsp1(at)juno.com" <ddddsp1(at)juno.com> After seeing the success Deems had getting results with the CONTACTS on this list I thought I would give it a shot myself. After 13 years selling Pharmaceuticals for Johnson & Johnson I was laid off last week in a RIF (reduction in force). If anyone is hiring District, Regional, or National Sales Reps I would love to talk to you about the opportunity. I also have 6 years of Sales Management. Looking preferably in the Central Plains/Midwest but willl look at all opportunities. Why not, with an RV10 I can travel if I need too! I enjoy selling and hope to find another position in outside sales. If your company is looking or you know of successful companies that are seekings sales reps I would certainly appreciate the tip. Thanks, DEAN SOMBKE 40449 ________________________________________________________________________ FREE for 30 Days! - Holiday eCards from AmericanGreetings.com Click HERE and start sending today!
Hello!
It's a small world. My wife and I both worked for J&J doing medical research in the La Jolla facility. We were told they were going to close the building. We were laid off with lots of other researchers there in 1994 and replaced with Chinese lower paid ones, using the H1-B visa program in a creative way. They built a new very large posh west-coast showcase research building instead of closing. We feel for you. Wish you luck. We have just started our empennage kit for our RV-10.
Brian and Ruth Preston
#40666
 

After seeing the success Deems had getting results with the CONTACTS on this list I thought I would give it a shot myself.

After 13 years selling Pharmaceuticals for Johnson & Johnson I was laid off last week in a RIF (reduction in force).  If anyone is hiring District, Regional, or National Sales Reps I would love to talk to you about the opportunity.  I also have 6 years of Sales Management.  Looking preferably in the Central Plains/Midwest but willl look at all opportunities.  Why not, with an RV10 I can travel if I need too!

I enjoy selling and hope to find another position in outside sales.   If your company is looking or you know of successful companies that are seekings sales reps I would certainly appreciate the tip. 

Thanks,

DEAN SOMBKE

40449



________________________________________________________________________
FREE for 30 Days! - Holiday eCards from AmericanGreetings.com
Click HERE and start sending today!


      
      
      

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Installing elevators and rudders
Date: Jan 05, 2007
From: "Patrick Pulis" <patrick.pulis(at)seagas.com.au>
Wayne, could you please send me your photos as I'm interested in the forced air from the overhead console. Did you install the vertical stabiliser scoop that they sell? Regards Patrick Pulis Adelaide, South Australia # 40299 _____ From: Wayne Edgerton [mailto:wayne.e(at)grandecom.net] Sent: Thursday, 4 January 2007 11:23 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Installing elevators and rudders Hi Jon, I purchased Accuracy Avionics overhead console for air and lights and this will be the air intake for the console. I've sent all of my build photos over to Tony at Accuracy Avionics http://www.accuracyavionics.com/v1/index.html and he said he will be posting them on his web site. If he doesn't, if anyone would like to see what I did, I can gladly forward them some photos. We'll see how well it works when I get into the air. It should work really well, in theory :>} Wayne Edgerton # 40336 starting instrument panel install today ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Albert Gardner" <ibspud(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: is: Bad Day At Blackrock - Score at the end of 2 innings
- vendors 2, Deems 0
Date: Jan 04, 2007
Better take in a drama or chick-flic, sounds like Van's is supplying all the comedy you need for the moment. Albert Gardner Yuma, AZ -----Original Message----- From: Deems Davis Judy's gone shopping, when she gets back I'm going to take her to a movie (hopefully a comedy!) Tomorrow is another day Let's see what adventure that brings Deems Davis # 406 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Russell Daves" <dav1111(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Wheel Pant Spacer Bolts BreakingWheel Pant Spacer Bolts
BreakingWheel Pant Spacer Bolts BreakingWheel Pant
Date: Jan 05, 2007
Dear Scott: My buddy, Linnard Griffin, and fellow RV-6 builder who is an A&P and machinist and has all the equipment to build would probably be happy to start taking orders if there were enough interest. If anyone wants to buy a set e-mail me direct at dav1111 at cox . net and I will start a list to see how much interest and let everyone know. Best regards, Russ Daves N710RV ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Gonzalez" <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com>
Subject: sirius VS XM, Throttle
Date: Jan 05, 2007
My wife got my a XM radio receiver for Christmas, but before I connected it to the car and hook it to the home stereo, I checked their programming. XM does not have NPR so I really need to go with Sirius. I have at least one more year before flying and my building hours require NPR. Garmin seems affiliated with XM and I wanted to have a 396 or 496. What systems are afiliated with Sirius for weather data link? Lastly, this is a crazy question. Back when I flew power, all the planes had yokes, so it was easy to fly left hand on the yoke and right hand on the throttle. I am so used to flying stick in the glider, 600+ hours (With no Throttle) that I really believe that landing the 10 and power adjustments will be strange, having to put the stick in the left hand and opperate the throttle with the right. Two choices, fly from the right seat or have dual throttle controls, one on the far left and one in the middle. Is this not an issue for anyone. Power to altitude, pitch to airspeed, that's what I was taught. On the glider even the spoilers are left hand operated and can be thought of as power. Anyone want to take a stab at this. John G. #409, everywhere and nowhere, and with a portable radioshack radio in the shop that keeps loosing reception. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "C Smith" <pilot4profit(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: sirius VS XM, Throttle
Date: Jan 05, 2007
On Behalf Of John Gonzalez Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 12:42 PM Subject: RV10-List: sirius VS XM, Throttle Garmin seems affiliated with XM and I wanted to have a 396 or 496. What systems are afiliated with Sirius for weather data link? Anyone want to take a stab at this. John G. John, there has been rumors of a possible weather data link from Sirius, but last I knew it wasn't up and running yet. Unfortunately, I don't remember the name of the provider, but they currently offer an aviation weather service for smart phones and such. Then they would need to get the avionics vendors on board as well. Anyone have any more current info? Craig Smith ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 05, 2007
From: "James K Hovis" <james.k.hovis(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: sirius VS XM, Throttle
John, The only thing I ever flew were yoke a/c (C172 & AA1A) until my CFI gave me a ride in his O-1 Birddog and let me take the stick for while. It took me a minute to learn right-hand stick handling (throttle is on left). I think it's the same as CFI's learning to fly from the right seat too, a skill that needs to be learned, but very masterable. I think you should set up the controls to be as comfortable to you as you want, but remember if you have to sell your bird in the future, anything "non-standard" might detract to the value of your bird to a potential buyer. I see a couple options beyond the as designed set-up if you're REALLY uncomfortable flying with left hand on stick: 1) install a left hand sidewall quadrant in addition to the center quadrant/push-pull engine controls. Main drawback is added weight for the interlocking linkage you'll need for the two controls. But, this maintains the "standard" right seat controls for dual pilot operations. 2) only go with controls on the left side. Saves weight, but you lose utility if you need dual training. Really, I don't think learning to fly left hand on a stick will be so difficult that you need to alter the designed set-up of the airplane. JKH On 1/5/07, John Gonzalez wrote: > > My wife got my a XM radio receiver for Christmas, but before I connected it > to the car and hook it to the home stereo, I checked their programming. XM > does not have NPR so I really need to go with Sirius. I have at least one > more year before flying and my building hours require NPR. > > Garmin seems affiliated with XM and I wanted to have a 396 or 496. What > systems are afiliated with Sirius for weather data link? > > Lastly, this is a crazy question. Back when I flew power, all the planes > had yokes, so it was easy to fly left hand on the yoke and right hand on the > throttle. I am so used to flying stick in the glider, 600+ hours (With no > Throttle) that I really believe that landing the 10 and power adjustments > will be strange, having to put the stick in the left hand and opperate the > throttle with the right. > > Two choices, fly from the right seat or have dual throttle controls, one on > the far left and one in the middle. Is this not an issue for anyone. Power > to altitude, pitch to airspeed, that's what I was taught. > > On the glider even the spoilers are left hand operated and can be thought of > as power. > > Anyone want to take a stab at this. > > John G. > > #409, everywhere and nowhere, and with a portable radioshack radio in the > shop that keeps loosing reception. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: sirius VS XM, Throttle
Date: Jan 05, 2007
From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com>
Not really a big deal. I like flying with the stick in my right hand, throttle in the left, as it is on my RV-4 and my Pietenpol Air Camper. The only time I've flown with a stick in my left hand was in my friend's RV-7, and it took about 2 minutes to get used to it. Far more difficult getting used to sitting on the left side of the plane when you are used to flying on the centerline. Jack Phillips #40610 Still working on the Elevators -----Original Message----- John, The only thing I ever flew were yoke a/c (C172 & AA1A) until my CFI gave me a ride in his O-1 Birddog and let me take the stick for while. It took me a minute to learn right-hand stick handling (throttle is on left). I think it's the same as CFI's learning to fly from the right seat too, a skill that needs to be learned, but very masterable. I think you should set up the controls to be as comfortable to you as you want, but remember if you have to sell your bird in the future, anything "non-standard" might detract to the value of your bird to a potential buyer. I see a couple options beyond the as designed set-up if you're REALLY uncomfortable flying with left hand on stick: 1) install a left hand sidewall quadrant in addition to the center quadrant/push-pull engine controls. Main drawback is added weight for the interlocking linkage you'll need for the two controls. But, this maintains the "standard" right seat controls for dual pilot operations. 2) only go with controls on the left side. Saves weight, but you lose utility if you need dual training. Really, I don't think learning to fly left hand on a stick will be so difficult that you need to alter the designed set-up of the airplane. JKH _________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 05, 2007
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Subject: Re: sirius VS XM, Throttle
John Gonzalez wrote: > Garmin seems affiliated with XM and I wanted to have a 396 or 496. What > systems are afiliated with Sirius for weather data link? > WSI will be the sirius related provider of weather datalink. They have the signal up now, and customers will move to it by about April 2007. A complete migration to sirius will be done by Septemer. Additionally, if you're looking for Sirius music, you should be highly interested in the PS Engineering 8000SR intercom/audio panel. I have the 8000 standard (no sirius) and it's fantastic. The 8000SR incorporates sirius satellite radio. > John G. > > #409, everywhere and nowhere, and with a portable radioshack radio in > the shop that keeps loosing reception. > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 05, 2007
From: "Kelly McMullen" <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: sirius VS XM, Throttle
On 1/5/07, James K Hovis wrote: > I see a couple options beyond the as designed set-up if you're REALLY > uncomfortable flying with left hand on stick: > > 1) install a left hand sidewall quadrant in addition to the center > quadrant/push-pull engine controls. Main drawback is added weight for > the interlocking linkage you'll need for the two controls. But, this > maintains the "standard" right seat controls for dual pilot > operations. > > 2) only go with controls on the left side. Saves weight, but you lose > utility if you need dual training. > > Really, I don't think learning to fly left hand on a stick will be so > difficult that you need to alter the designed set-up of the airplane. > > JKH Or you could design the panel so you could have EFIS on either side, and moving map on either side, so that you could be equally comfortable flying it from either seat. I'm really thinking of designing panel that way. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 05, 2007
From: MauleDriver <MauleDriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: sirius VS XM, Throttle
Re XM and Sirius I'm an NPR builder (WUNC) and a 396 owner. I thought I might feel your pain but I don't because: - I have high speed Web access in my shop - The best radio for NPR may be a Web connected PC streaming NPR from whatever you listen too. Since my local NPR outlet is streamed 24 hours, I can get exactly what I normally get, plus I can pick any of the other streaming sources and pickup shows I'm still discovering. YMMV - Almost all NPR shows are available as free podcasts. More work but a good option when you want something specific - My XM account allows me to stream (most of) XM's offerings on the Web. Does Sirius offer this? I use that a lot more than I use the actual satellite thru my 396 - There's a recent news item speculating that it may be time for XM to acquire Sirius or vice-a-versa. Potentially good and bad news I'd say Re: Sticks, yokes, gliders, power, quadrants, push pulls and verniers I've managed to fly all combinations at least a little bit and found very little adjustment required. And very little preference given the aircraft involved. After 5 hours, I'm not even thinking about it (except for the vernier throttle on my Maule - took at least 20 hours before it faded into proficiency). I flew 1000+ glider hours uninterrupted by vibrator flying and found the 10 hour transition back was mainly about that little wheel in the back. I wouldn't worry *at all* about power adjustments in the '10. The throttle will never work as well as spoilers but who needs a stink'n engine to hit a spot or grease it on? I'm still drilling myself on "go arounds" as in, "remember Mauledriver, if it doesn't look right you can go try it again". There are a few off-fields where I wish that was an option :-) Be Happy Bill (riveting and riveting the tailcone and still trying to finish those darn elevators while the QB dusts over) Watson John Gonzalez wrote: > > My wife got my a XM radio receiver for Christmas, but before I > connected it to the car and hook it to the home stereo, I checked > their programming. XM does not have NPR so I really need to go with > Sirius. I have at least one more year before flying and my building > hours require NPR. > > Garmin seems affiliated with XM and I wanted to have a 396 or 496. > What systems are afiliated with Sirius for weather data link? > > Lastly, this is a crazy question. Back when I flew power, all the > planes had yokes, so it was easy to fly left hand on the yoke and > right hand on the throttle. I am so used to flying stick in the > glider, 600+ hours (With no Throttle) that I really believe that > landing the 10 and power adjustments will be strange, having to put > the stick in the left hand and opperate the throttle with the right. > > Two choices, fly from the right seat or have dual throttle controls, > one on the far left and one in the middle. Is this not an issue for > anyone. Power to altitude, pitch to airspeed, that's what I was taught. > > On the glider even the spoilers are left hand operated and can be > thought of as power. > > Anyone want to take a stab at this. > > John G. > > #409, everywhere and nowhere, and with a portable radioshack radio in > the shop that keeps loosing reception. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: sirius VS XM, Throttle
Date: Jan 05, 2007
From: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR(at)wernerco.com>
Yeah, but you can get a dash mount or portable Sirius and plug it into the audio in jack on a regular 8000, for significantly less than the combo unit costs. Dan N289DT -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Olson Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 2:21 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: sirius VS XM, Throttle John Gonzalez wrote: > Garmin seems affiliated with XM and I wanted to have a 396 or 496. What > systems are afiliated with Sirius for weather data link? > WSI will be the sirius related provider of weather datalink. They have the signal up now, and customers will move to it by about April 2007. A complete migration to sirius will be done by Septemer. Additionally, if you're looking for Sirius music, you should be highly interested in the PS Engineering 8000SR intercom/audio panel. I have the 8000 standard (no sirius) and it's fantastic. The 8000SR incorporates sirius satellite radio. > John G. > > #409, everywhere and nowhere, and with a portable radioshack radio in > the shop that keeps loosing reception. > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 05, 2007
From: Phil Hall <phil(at)asibuildings.com>
Subject: RV10
If anyone is interested, I just put my 90% done, 90% to go 10 up for sale on the vansairforce.com Phil 888-583-5155 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: sirius VS XM, Throttle
Date: Jan 05, 2007
From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder(at)sausen.net>
You can stream Sirius from the Web and it's also carried on DISH but pared down a bit for duplicates like the news channels and such. This was discussed recently but you should try both before you buy if possible. I've had both for extended periods and ended up with Sirius as my final choice, and not because of that tool they paid 500 million to. :-) Michael -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of MauleDriver Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 1:50 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: sirius VS XM, Throttle Re XM and Sirius I'm an NPR builder (WUNC) and a 396 owner. I thought I might feel your pain but I don't because: - I have high speed Web access in my shop - The best radio for NPR may be a Web connected PC streaming NPR from whatever you listen too. Since my local NPR outlet is streamed 24 hours, I can get exactly what I normally get, plus I can pick any of the other streaming sources and pickup shows I'm still discovering. YMMV - Almost all NPR shows are available as free podcasts. More work but a good option when you want something specific - My XM account allows me to stream (most of) XM's offerings on the Web. Does Sirius offer this? I use that a lot more than I use the actual satellite thru my 396 - There's a recent news item speculating that it may be time for XM to acquire Sirius or vice-a-versa. Potentially good and bad news I'd say Re: Sticks, yokes, gliders, power, quadrants, push pulls and verniers I've managed to fly all combinations at least a little bit and found very little adjustment required. And very little preference given the aircraft involved. After 5 hours, I'm not even thinking about it (except for the vernier throttle on my Maule - took at least 20 hours before it faded into proficiency). I flew 1000+ glider hours uninterrupted by vibrator flying and found the 10 hour transition back was mainly about that little wheel in the back. I wouldn't worry *at all* about power adjustments in the '10. The throttle will never work as well as spoilers but who needs a stink'n engine to hit a spot or grease it on? I'm still drilling myself on "go arounds" as in, "remember Mauledriver, if it doesn't look right you can go try it again". There are a few off-fields where I wish that was an option :-) Be Happy Bill (riveting and riveting the tailcone and still trying to finish those darn elevators while the QB dusts over) Watson John Gonzalez wrote: > > My wife got my a XM radio receiver for Christmas, but before I > connected it to the car and hook it to the home stereo, I checked > their programming. XM does not have NPR so I really need to go with > Sirius. I have at least one more year before flying and my building > hours require NPR. > > Garmin seems affiliated with XM and I wanted to have a 396 or 496. > What systems are afiliated with Sirius for weather data link? > > Lastly, this is a crazy question. Back when I flew power, all the > planes had yokes, so it was easy to fly left hand on the yoke and > right hand on the throttle. I am so used to flying stick in the > glider, 600+ hours (With no Throttle) that I really believe that > landing the 10 and power adjustments will be strange, having to put > the stick in the left hand and opperate the throttle with the right. > > Two choices, fly from the right seat or have dual throttle controls, > one on the far left and one in the middle. Is this not an issue for > anyone. Power to altitude, pitch to airspeed, that's what I was taught. > > On the glider even the spoilers are left hand operated and can be > thought of as power. > > Anyone want to take a stab at this. > > John G. > > #409, everywhere and nowhere, and with a portable radioshack radio in > the shop that keeps loosing reception. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 05, 2007
From: Eric Panning <ericmpmail-rv10(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Avmap IV, Anywhere MAP, and Garmin 496 review
I've recently bought the AVMAP and gave it a brief test flight under IFR during a lesson (I have about 12 hrs IFR inst.) I ended up returning it for the following reasons. 1) It is big, which is great - but it is really too big for my Cherokee 180 yoke in horizontal and too tall vertical. 2) In map mode, it does not overlay an HSI. I really did not like this. It also jumped around from track up to north up, etc. I'm sure if I worked with it more I would have gotten it to settle down. However, in my scan - I have only ~ 2-3 seconds to spend looking at the GPS. Not enough time to worry about track vs north, etc. Also plane would jump around in position on the screen. The screen is big enough that it should always be centered. In vertical mode, the plane is far enough down on the screen that you are almost looking at your lap. 3) Screen is bright, very legible, but critical items are small on the screen. VOR, NDB's etc are hard to read. 4) Menu logic takes getting use to. small joy stick on unit was biggest disappointment. It was inconsistent in operation and did not provide positive feedback. 5) No easy way to export/import flight routes or tracks 6) ~ 90 min battery life 7) No XM Weather yet. They have a USB port but not audio out. 8) Database was 6+ months out of date on receipt and no free upgrade to current. 9) Antenna was fantastic and reception was very good even in the garage. They have apparently moved to 20 channel GPS but mine had 12 channel. (Old stock? Ordered from one of their largest dealers...) 10) Too wide to fit within the constraints of an audio stack panel mount. 11) Terrain was high res and nicely done 12) Did not use airways or approach features. 13) Only used for 2 hrs in flight + 5 hrs on the ground so consider this a first impression. Anywhere map: I've been using this system for years. I current use a Dell 50v, with a bluetooth GPS, and current anywhere map software. I've decided that I need a new option as touch screen is not good for IFR 1) Compromise. If you have and need a PDA, not a bad option. I have a blackberry now and don't use the PDA for anything else. 2) Screen is not very bright, not as good as IPAQ units (also had one of those). Washes out in direct sun and AR coating on screen not as good (wear a black shirt and not white... unless you want to see yourself in the screen.) 3) Zoom delay is significant - ~ 4 seconds for a detailed screen 4) Display is a little bit smaller than Garmin but display logic is not as good by far. non-tower Airports are in a magenta that washes out easily. Discussed this with them and they wanted to duplicate sectional - but doesn't make sense if you cannot read airport details 5) Touch screen interface is biggest liability. if it's bumpy, you will have trouble entering info and navigating menu's. This was key motivation for seeking a replacement. 6) I do not have XM weather for anywhere map, I think it is pricey 7) I will be selling this system soon, with yoke mount, GPS, etc... 8) If you lose the plane power, PDA battery drains quickly. Night dim on the 50V is still bright enough to be a distraction. Garmin 496: After trying potential options, I returned the AvMAP IV and bought a 496. I have not flown with it yet in the plane, but I have flown it all over the place using simulator mode (and car) First impressions: 1) Garmin has a polished product that really works 2) All the area where the PDA/AvMAP let me down, Garmin seems to have gotten right. Menu is very intuitive and easy to follow - despite complexity of the unit. Rocker button is excellent. 3) XM Weather is incredible. You can flip through weather charts on the ground and conduct your own pre-flight briefing - Nexrad, satellite, metar, TAF, freezing level, cloud tops, winds, TFR's, airmet, sigmet, etc in a couple of minutes. Great background for when you call the briefer... 4) Weather overlay with moving map is great. Easy to get rid and bring back all the weather too. Very fast screen updates. 5) Screen is 3.8", just a little bit bigger than Dell 50v. However, it is much brighter and display logic from Garmin is excellent. Everything you need to see is big, bold and easy to read from a distance. I can see how panel mounting would work for this unit. I think it would be way to far away for Anywhere map. This was one of my concerns when buying the unit and I am surprised how good it is. 6) approaches: Database has all the intersections but only the FAF and Runway for stored approaches. You can create routes that mimic the approach. I think best will be to make the intersections big on the map (weakness of Avmap) and use it as reference while setting up approach, then load approach while nearing FAF and fly as reference. I have not played with VNAV yet, but it seems one of the weaker features of the Garmin. 7) Support. Free update coupon with unit and existing database expired in November. 8) Ability to easily download tracks and import into google map, etc. (See www.vansairforce.net) 9) flight log - looks interesting, have not tried yet 10) panel page - fast refresh rate. Will try partial panel with this alone this weekend (with instructor of course!) 11) 496 comes with all the acessories (auto, yoke mount, Li-ION battery). AvMAP does not. Yoke is another 70-100, batteries ~ 50 (NiMH AA). No automount for the avmap (and no database). 12) I ordered full aviator XM package, easy to switch from one to the other. I also got the XM audio for 6.99 more. Wish they had NPR too, but BBC is ok. 13) Safetaxi is a nice feature. I never liked Anywhere maps version and never used it. It has my home field in it. I'm surprised it "comes on" at the map scale that it does and I thought it would wait until much closer (or more zoomed in). Perhaps a setting issue. I can't find any info on what airports are or are not in the Safetaxi database but it seems they picked mostly big tower fields with crossing runways. (makes sense) 14) I did drive along with the preloaded auto map. This works well and is very similar to the one in the car. Our 2nd car does not have mapping so perhaps I will take along on big trips. Is the Garmin 496 worth ~ 2800? I think so. Situational awareness is fantastic - XM pushes TFR's out as well and if you don't like it a year from now I bet you can find a buyer for a fair fraction of the original. I was surprised how little independent info was out on comparisions. That's why I took the time to write this up. Hopefully, some of you have found it useful.... I may eventually put in the RV-10 with an SL-30 and mode-S transponder. For less than 9k you could have ILS/VOR approaches, traffic, weather, XM-radio, linking to SL-30 for radio frequencies, and 496 can also drive an autopilot (via GPS to CDI conversion box. Dynon for Attitude, HSI display, etc for another ~ 3k. 1/5/07 Eric Panning Flying Cherokee and building 40150 (stuck on fuselage..) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steven DiNieri" <capsteve(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: prop hub space
Date: Jan 05, 2007
I've got my engine hung and am getting ready to fit the cowling, but I don't have a prop or hub. I do have the spinner, but need to know the exact size of the constant speed prop hub to ensure proper spacing. I figured I'd be able to insert a spacer between the spinner backplate and flywheel. I did check archives and vans does have a note online but I really need to hear some actual measured dimensions to be able to sleep at night. I'm sure some would also be interested in knowing if the MT and Hartzel are dimensionally the same. Any and all input would be greatly appreciated. Steve 40205 Iflyrv10.com Coming soon ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Fixitauto(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 05, 2007
Subject: Re: prop hub space
For the hartzel prop make that space 2.00 in. Roger 40079 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "C Smith" <pilot4profit(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: sirius VS XM, Throttle
Date: Jan 05, 2007
-----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Olson Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 2:21 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: sirius VS XM, Throttle WSI will be the sirius related provider of weather datalink. They have the signal up now, and customers will move to it by about April 2007. A complete migration to sirius will be done by Septemer. Additionally, if you're looking for Sirius music, you should be highly interested in the PS Engineering 8000SR intercom/audio panel. I have the 8000 standard (no sirius) and it's fantastic. The 8000SR incorporates sirius satellite radio. Yeah, WSI that's the one. You don't have any pricing on that service do you? Could you post a link to their website? Craig Smith ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 05, 2007
From: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: sirius VS XM, Throttle
I got my wife Sirius last Xmas because of that tool they paid 500 million to. ;-) I would suggest the portable route, this way you only have one subscription. Larry Rosen #356 RV Builder (Michael Sausen) wrote: > > You can stream Sirius from the Web and it's also carried on DISH but > pared down a bit for duplicates like the news channels and such. This > was discussed recently but you should try both before you buy if > possible. I've had both for extended periods and ended up with Sirius > as my final choice, and not because of that tool they paid 500 million > to. :-) > > Michael > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of MauleDriver > Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 1:50 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: sirius VS XM, Throttle > > > Re XM and Sirius > I'm an NPR builder (WUNC) and a 396 owner. I thought I might feel your > pain but I don't because: > - I have high speed Web access in my shop > - The best radio for NPR may be a Web connected PC streaming NPR from > whatever you listen too. Since my local NPR outlet is streamed 24 > hours, I can get exactly what I normally get, plus I can pick any of the > > other streaming sources and pickup shows I'm still discovering. YMMV > - Almost all NPR shows are available as free podcasts. More work but a > good option when you want something specific > - My XM account allows me to stream (most of) XM's offerings on the Web. > > Does Sirius offer this? I use that a lot more than I use the actual > satellite thru my 396 > - There's a recent news item speculating that it may be time for XM to > acquire Sirius or vice-a-versa. Potentially good and bad news I'd say > > Re: Sticks, yokes, gliders, power, quadrants, push pulls and verniers > I've managed to fly all combinations at least a little bit and found > very little adjustment required. And very little preference given the > aircraft involved. After 5 hours, I'm not even thinking about it > (except for the vernier throttle on my Maule - took at least 20 hours > before it faded into proficiency). I flew 1000+ glider hours > uninterrupted by vibrator flying and found the 10 hour transition back > was mainly about that little wheel in the back. I wouldn't worry *at > all* about power adjustments in the '10. The throttle will never work > as well as spoilers but who needs a stink'n engine to hit a spot or > grease it on? > > I'm still drilling myself on "go arounds" as in, "remember Mauledriver, > > if it doesn't look right you can go try it again". There are a few > off-fields where I wish that was an option :-) > > Be Happy > Bill (riveting and riveting the tailcone and still trying to finish > those darn elevators while the QB dusts over) Watson > > John Gonzalez wrote: > >> > > >> My wife got my a XM radio receiver for Christmas, but before I >> connected it to the car and hook it to the home stereo, I checked >> their programming. XM does not have NPR so I really need to go with >> Sirius. I have at least one more year before flying and my building >> hours require NPR. >> >> Garmin seems affiliated with XM and I wanted to have a 396 or 496. >> What systems are afiliated with Sirius for weather data link? >> >> Lastly, this is a crazy question. Back when I flew power, all the >> planes had yokes, so it was easy to fly left hand on the yoke and >> right hand on the throttle. I am so used to flying stick in the >> glider, 600+ hours (With no Throttle) that I really believe that >> landing the 10 and power adjustments will be strange, having to put >> the stick in the left hand and opperate the throttle with the right. >> >> Two choices, fly from the right seat or have dual throttle controls, >> one on the far left and one in the middle. Is this not an issue for >> anyone. Power to altitude, pitch to airspeed, that's what I was >> > taught. > >> On the glider even the spoilers are left hand operated and can be >> thought of as power. >> >> Anyone want to take a stab at this. >> >> John G. >> >> #409, everywhere and nowhere, and with a portable radioshack radio in >> the shop that keeps loosing reception. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: John Ackerman <johnag5b(at)cableone.net>
Subject: Re: sirius VS XM, Throttle
Date: Jan 05, 2007
Hey John Suggest you get some time in (preferably) a RV-10 or another left stick airplane, see how it goes. Just some personal experience: I transitioned to a left -hand stick in a Luscombe from various other yoke and center stick airplanes - seemed natural enough to me - never an issue. I might have had 3-400 hours at the time. I also took a few hours with Alex this last December in his 10, and the stick in the left hand was not an issue,. There were times when I wanted to use my right hand to operate the coolie hat trim, though- strength required on stick. That was my first stick flying since I sold my glider in about 1998. I'll bet you find this is not something to worry about. John Ackerman On Jan 5, 2007, at 10:41 AM, John Gonzalez wrote: > > > My wife got my a XM radio receiver for Christmas, but before I > connected it to the car and hook it to the home stereo, I checked > their programming. XM does not have NPR so I really need to go > with Sirius. I have at least one more year before flying and my > building hours require NPR. > > Garmin seems affiliated with XM and I wanted to have a 396 or 496. > What systems are afiliated with Sirius for weather data link? > > Lastly, this is a crazy question. Back when I flew power, all the > planes had yokes, so it was easy to fly left hand on the yoke and > right hand on the throttle. I am so used to flying stick in the > glider, 600+ hours (With no Throttle) that I really believe that > landing the 10 and power adjustments will be strange, having to put > the stick in the left hand and opperate the throttle with the right. > > Two choices, fly from the right seat or have dual throttle > controls, one on the far left and one in the middle. Is this not an > issue for anyone. Power to altitude, pitch to airspeed, that's > what I was taught. > > On the glider even the spoilers are left hand operated and can be > thought of as power. > > Anyone want to take a stab at this. > > John G. > > #409, everywhere and nowhere, and with a portable radioshack radio > in the shop that keeps loosing reception. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Van's shipping department, where did everyone go??
From: "Eric_Kallio" <scout019(at)msn.com>
Date: Jan 06, 2007
I just got my standard or slow-build wings in November. It took 8 weeks to get them shipped. I ordered some parts such as the fuel senders and some tubing. 2 weeks after the order was placed it finally showed up. As for the tailcone I spent about 85 hours on it. Eric Kallio 40518-leading edges Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85843#85843 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Kraus" <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net>
Subject: prop hub space
Date: Jan 06, 2007
We used the dimensions on Van's web site to set the cowl for the RV-7 we built before we had the prop. After we set the prop and reinstalled the cowl, there was interference. We then had to re-cut the back of the cowl to the fuselage and re-do that area, which then caused the cowl to not fit as nice as we would have liked (it puts added stress on the side hinges). On my -4 and on my -10, we had the prop prior to cowl install and they both turned out nice. Not to say it can't be done without the prop, but my recommendation is to have the prop and spinner on before setting the cowl and you know it will be right and will be able to sleep at night. -Mike Kraus -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Steven DiNieri Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 5:51 PM Subject: RV10-List: prop hub space --> I've got my engine hung and am getting ready to fit the cowling, but I don't have a prop or hub. I do have the spinner, but need to know the exact size of the constant speed prop hub to ensure proper spacing. I figured I'd be able to insert a spacer between the spinner backplate and flywheel. I did check archives and vans does have a note online but I really need to hear some actual measured dimensions to be able to sleep at night. I'm sure some would also be interested in knowing if the MT and Hartzel are dimensionally the same. Any and all input would be greatly appreciated. Steve 40205 Iflyrv10.com Coming soon ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 06, 2007
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: [Fwd: D2A announcement]
I received the following from Dexter Turner Owner/Pres of Op Tech. Which I'm am forwarding in the hope it might help/provide some relief to some of the folks caught in this awful situation. Best wishes Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ Deems, Youve probably heard along with everyone else about Direct2 closing its doors. We just announced a January discount program to allow ex-D2A customers to recover some or in some cases all of their losses and I was wondering if you could post our announcement to the vans mailing list. Thanks. Dexter Turner Op Technologies (503) 690-0800 ext 29 cell (503) 553-9106 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Gonzalez" <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com>
Subject: sirius!!
Date: Jan 06, 2007
Well, we got sirius and hooked it up and I can't believe I been building without this for over a year. The quality of the sound sounds so different from land based VHF, it takes a bit of getting used to. Ain't technology something!!!! Thanks to all who gave replys to the throttle and the XM vs Sirius. If I end up needing XM for my Garmin in the future, at least I'll remember how I first felt getting the service, it is worth it. JOhn G. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "gary" <speckter(at)comcast.net>
Subject: [Fwd: D2A announcement]
Date: Jan 06, 2007
I have already decided to go with OP Teck. However, I ordered my engine probes back in Sept and with the help of Stein making numerous calls and threats; I finally got them last week. My challenge to them is "Take care of your current customers before you go looking for more of them that you cannot 0r will not service in a timely manner. Gary 40274 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 2:45 PM Subject: RV10-List: [Fwd: D2A announcement] I received the following from Dexter Turner Owner/Pres of Op Tech. Which I'm am forwarding in the hope it might help/provide some relief to some of the folks caught in this awful situation. Best wishes Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ Deems, You've probably heard along with everyone else about Direct2 closing it's doors. We just announced a January discount program to allow ex-D2A customers to recover some or in some cases all of their losses and I was wondering if you could post our announcement to the vans mailing list. Thanks. Dexter Turner Op Technologies (503) 690-0800 ext 29 cell (503) 553-9106 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: D2A announcement]
Date: Jan 06, 2007
If I am not mistaken they (OPTECH) use the XBOW 420/425 AHRS. If you are happy with the XBOW then your cost to complete your Chelton system can be relatively low. My calculations to complete a Chelton system if you have your screens will be the 420/425 at a dealer cost of $2800-3000 and a $250 dealer cost air data unit (EAU) from Grand Rapids Technologies which D2A bought from GRT for delivery with their system if a customer was not using the GRT Engine info system (EIS). Magnetometer and GPS are integrated in the 420/425. ----- Original Message ----- From: "gary" <speckter(at)comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 2:28 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: [Fwd: D2A announcement] > > I have already decided to go with OP Teck. However, I ordered my engine > probes back in Sept and with the help of Stein making numerous calls and > threats; I finally got them last week. My challenge to them is "Take care > of your current customers before you go looking for more of them that you > cannot 0r will not service in a timely manner. > Gary > 40274 > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis > Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 2:45 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: [Fwd: D2A announcement] > > I received the following from Dexter Turner Owner/Pres of Op Tech. Which > I'm am forwarding in the hope it might help/provide some relief to some > of the folks caught in this awful situation. > > Best wishes > > Deems Davis # 406 > Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) > http://deemsrv10.com/ > > > Deems, > > You've probably heard along with everyone else about Direct2 closing > it's doors. We just announced a January discount program to allow ex-D2A > customers to recover some or in some cases all of their losses and I was > wondering if you could post our announcement to the vans mailing list. > > Thanks. > > Dexter Turner > > Op Technologies > > (503) 690-0800 ext 29 > > cell (503) 553-9106 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 06, 2007
From: MauleDriver <MauleDriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: sirius!!
Yep. I was enjoying the "black light/head phone" hour on XM's Deep Tracks channel last night. Hope none of those rivets flew off into 70's hyperspace. Wheeeee! John Gonzalez wrote: > > Well, we got sirius and hooked it up and I can't believe I been > building without this for over a year. > > The quality of the sound sounds so different from land based VHF, it > takes a bit of getting used to. > > Ain't technology something!!!! > > Thanks to all who gave replys to the throttle and the XM vs Sirius. > If I end up needing XM for my Garmin in the future, at least I'll > remember how I first felt getting the service, it is worth it. > > JOhn G. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Cabin top too rough?
Date: Jan 06, 2007
From: "Chris Johnston" <CJohnston(at)popsound.com>
Hey all - I'm merrily going along trimming my cabin top to fit, and the further I go, the more I wonder if other people's cabin tops are as rough as mine. I don't know diddley about fiberglass just yet. I expect to do a lot of smoothing, but is this ok? i've provided some pictures so you can see what i'm talking about. The front pilot side door post is basically a big blob of epoxy with lots of holes and voids. I think there's plenty of fiberglass layers underneath that, but I'm no expert. I hear people talking about having a hard time filling pin-holes in fiberglass pieces, but my holes are more like nail holes. Am I having a normal experience? cj #40410 fuse ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 06, 2007
From: MauleDriver <MauleDriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: OT - What a nice day and aren't pilots great
Durham NC: It was in the 70s today with a 10-15 knot breeze, deep blue skies and scattered cu. Some non-aviation friends had scheduled a mid-winter tandem jump at North Raleigh AP. We told them that we might fly up and watch while thinking, "mid-winter jump??....brrrrrr". Well it was an outrageously nice day so we flew up and just basked in the sun. Jumpers climbed into the Casa 20 at a time and technicolor polka dots broke out overhead every 45 minutes. Smiles were all around. What a day it was. When we first landed at the jump 'port, a pilot walked by and asked us what kind of plane we were flying. Told him it was a Maule and we exchanged pleasantries. I'm green with envy because I immediately know this guy is flying the Casas and the twin DeHavillands, two aircraft that fit my mind's eye like the small of my wife's back. I nonchalantly acknowledge that he must be flying the jump planes while answering his question abouts how long I've owned the Maule and whether I liked it. Well, I'm a little embarrassed by the bounce and waggle I performed for him during my crosswind landing but I know better than to mention it. After all, I did the best I could given the conditions. I tell him I used to fly gliders here but haven't been by in awhile. He tells me that he has lots of time in a Thrush (turbo duster?), twin tailed Beeches and other tailwheel stuff but now he's stuck flying these tri-gear things. As I walk away, I realize that we were both working hard to establish some sort of credibility with each other, as if we needed too. Sort of like 2 dogs giving each other a friendly sniff. The guy flies equipment I can only dream of and I did a passable crosswind landing in a tough spot with a tailwheel. Isn't flying great? Bill "just blew off 15mins of rivet time" Watson ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 06, 2007
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Cabin top too rough?
Chris, no pictures came through on my end. Unfortunately your experience matches mine exactly!!!!!!! The interior of the cabin cover looks like a relief map of the Himalayas. It took HOURS and HOURS of sanding/ filing, filling, and repeat to get an acceptable solution. If you are considering using an overhead plenum/duct for air vents, lights etc, you can save a small amount of that work. One lesson I learned (too late) was to avoid using Bondo as a filler. While it has the advantage of 'setting up quickly to sandable stage. Apparently it has a history of shrinking and opening up cracks. Unfortunately the effects are not realized/seen for a couple of years. Gary Spectecter put me on to 2 products that I'm using. Superfil , which is an epoxy based filler with microbaloons already mixed, and Superprime which is a primer/pinhole filler. The only downside to the SuperFil is that it requires an 8 hr cure time vs the minutes for the auto body fillers. If you haven't started on your doors your in for more of the same. come to think about it ALL of Van's fiberglass/composite parts require an inordinate amount of time to get them to a finished stage with acceptable appearance. Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Cabin top too rough?
Date: Jan 06, 2007
From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder(at)sausen.net>
Welcome to the wonderful world of Van's outsourced fiberglass work. Functional but absolutely crap for workmanship. Mine still has a whole bunch of vacuum bag stuck in between the folds of epoxy. One would normally expect a mat in between the bag and the part to help absorb excess resin but it doesn't look like they bothered on mine. I would be embarrassed to let a part go out the door like the fiberglass parts that Van's passes on to the customers. Not a new thing unfortunately, so I wouldn't expect them to do anything about it. Michael -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Chris Johnston Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 4:58 PM Subject: RV10-List: Cabin top too rough? Hey all - I'm merrily going along trimming my cabin top to fit, and the further I go, the more I wonder if other people's cabin tops are as rough as mine. I don't know diddley about fiberglass just yet. I expect to do a lot of smoothing, but is this ok? i've provided some pictures so you can see what i'm talking about. The front pilot side door post is basically a big blob of epoxy with lots of holes and voids. I think there's plenty of fiberglass layers underneath that, but I'm no expert. I hear people talking about having a hard time filling pin-holes in fiberglass pieces, but my holes are more like nail holes. Am I having a normal experience? cj #40410 fuse ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: The Chelton offer
Date: Jan 06, 2007
For those who paid their money to D2A directly or through a dealer and were shorted equipment, Chelton will sell a dual display system with Pinpoint GADAHRS components for addtional $10300. For those needing only an AHRS, they will sell the Pinpoint GADAHRS components for an additional $4000. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Cabin top too rough?
From: "zackrv8" <zackrv8(at)verizon.net>
Date: Jan 06, 2007
CJ, The top is bad enough, but wait till you get to the doors! In addition to filling and smooth voids, you have to work hard at the gap between the door and the cabin top. Way too much work. The fiberglass is really in a rough stage. Wish they could have made it a little better to save some time. Zack CJohnston(at)popsound.com wrote: > Hey all - > > I'm merrily going along trimming my cabin top to fit, and the further I go, the more I wonder if other people's cabin tops are as rough as mine. I don't know diddley about fiberglass just yet. I expect to do a lot of smoothing, but is this ok? i've provided some pictures so you can see what i'm talking about. The front pilot side door post is basically a big blob of epoxy with lots of holes and voids. I think there's plenty of fiberglass layers underneath that, but I'm no expert. I hear people talking about having a hard time filling pin-holes in fiberglass pieces, but my holes are more like nail holes. Am I having a normal experience? > > cj > #40410 > fuse -------- RV8 #80125 RV10 # 40512 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85962#85962 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 06, 2007
From: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Adding Extra Holes in Center Bulkhead
I need to add 2 additional holes in the vertical center bulkhead channels (F1004 C&D) to pass the electrical wires through. I will be adding a doubler to each channel. Is there a standard as to which side the doubler should be added? The outside or inside. Diagram if "[" is the channel then outside [ inside -- Larry Rosen RV-10 #356 http://lrosen.nerv10.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DejaVu" <wvu(at)ameritel.net>
Subject: N591VU Flies
Date: Jan 07, 2007
Gang, Short summary, WOW, what a sense of accomplishment! Flight was uneventful. D4A5 engine was healthy. Plane flew hands off. A fe w pictures of the grin attached. Enjoy! Keep pounding those rivets. Anh #141 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 07, 2007
From: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Cabin top too rough?
Prior to filling and priming the top remember to somehow mark or drill out the hard points for the front seat belts. There have been multiple requests on this list for the dimensions to locate the points, because they could no longer locate them since the top was no longer translucent. -- Larry Rosen RV-10 #356 http://lrosen.nerv10.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: N591VU Flies
From: "zackrv8" <zackrv8(at)verizon.net>
Date: Jan 07, 2007
Anh, Absolutely COOL! Great feeling, isn't it? Wish it could last forever. I'll be down to see you soon. Zack wvu(at)ameritel.net wrote: > Gang, > Short summary, WOW, what a sense of accomplishment! > Flight was uneventful. D4A5 engine was healthy. Plane flew hands off. A few pictures of the grin attached. Enjoy! > Keep pounding those rivets. > Anh > #141 -------- RV8 #80125 RV10 # 40512 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86023#86023 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: N591VU Flies
Date: Jan 07, 2007
From: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR(at)wernerco.com>
Congratulations! Can not wait to see it in person! Dan N289DT (40269) _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of DejaVu Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 1:47 AM Subject: RV10-List: N591VU Flies Gang, Short summary, WOW, what a sense of accomplishment! Flight was uneventful. D4A5 engine was healthy. Plane flew hands off. A few pictures of the grin attached. Enjoy! Keep pounding those rivets. Anh #141 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Boone" <david555(at)cox.net>
Subject: Fuel Filter Modifications
Date: Jan 07, 2007
My partner in crime, Richard Reynolds came up with a modification to address my concerns about the accessibility of the fuel filter in the tunnel "We" purchased two filters (approx $65 each) and installed one for each tank under the pilot and co-pilot seats. We also installed valves that can shut fuel off to the tanks so the tanks will not have to be drained in order to clean the filters. I used to be the quality manager of Holley Carb. and have seen significant automotive fuel contamination and suspect that the some of the same contamination issues apply to Avgas. Also the Left and Right filters add a little safety to the equation. If anyone is interested Richard can post some pictures in a couple weeks. 40138 David Boone and Richard Reynolds ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 07, 2007
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: N591VU Flies
I've been looking for this post and wondering when it would happen. Great Job, and Best Wishes for the uneventful hours of enjoyment ahead. Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Ritter" <mritter509(at)msn.com>
Subject: N591VU Flies
Date: Jan 07, 2007
Anh, Congratulations on quite an accomplishment. Just a word of caution - in the first photo I see your headsets on the glareshield. I had a passenger put his there and they left a nasty deep scratch. I ended up replacing the wind shield which was not fun. Mark (N410MR) >From: "DejaVu" <wvu(at)ameritel.net> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: "RV10" >Subject: RV10-List: N591VU Flies >Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 01:47:13 -0500 > >Gang, >Short summary, WOW, what a sense of accomplishment! >Flight was uneventful. D4A5 engine was healthy. Plane flew hands off. A >few pictures of the grin attached. Enjoy! >Keep pounding those rivets. >Anh >#141 ><< DSC_0040a.JPG >> ><< DSC_0013a.JPG >> ><< DSC_0032a.JPG >> ><< DSC_0034a.JPG >> _________________________________________________________________ Your Hotmail address already works to sign into Windows Live Messenger! Get it now ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dave Hertner" <effectus(at)rogers.com>
Subject: Re: N591VU Flies
Date: Jan 07, 2007
Ahn, Wonderful news ! Look at that RV grin ! Congratulations on putting another of our flock into the air. See you at the shows. Dave Hertner #40164 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "RAS" <deruiteraircraftservices(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Cabin top too rough?
Date: Jan 07, 2007
Hi All, If you want a quick(er) fix for pinholes in composites and don't mind spending a few dollars extra use "Static Conditioner" made by Akzo Aerospace. It fills pinholes quite fast, dries in about half hour and excess is then scraped of with a squeegee or similar. Use a tackrag to remove dust, Don't use compressed air, Don't use any thinners! Over this you spray a couple of coats of Laminar x-500 also by Akzo. It seals in the Static conditioner. spray until a uniform white layer covers all Static. Let this cure and wet sand to a smooth uniform surface, with either 240 or 320 grit paper, by hand or orbital sander. Look for pinholes, fill with bodyfiller, push hard on the filler to force into the holes, scrape the excess, you want to fill a hole not make your parts bigger or heavier. sand these spots either wet or dry and apply thin coat of primer to show other surface imperfections, fill them , sand and spot prime, apply topcoat. I personally prefer to use a metal adhesion spreader to apply body filler, the flex in the metal assists in forcing the filler into the hole, it also makes it easier to scrape of the excess. Remove as much excess as you can, it will save time, material and mess form sanding. I've painted numerous engine nacelles using above process when working for Bombardier Aerospace in Belfast, N.Ireland. Bombardier used to have a state of the art(years ago)composite factory which eventualy expanded into former DeLorean factory as well. The materials above are not the cheapest but they DO really work and don't take forever and a day (no pun intended) to cure. If the company who makes the composites for vans can be persuaded to use a two cure cycle rather than single cure the quality would be improved quite a bit. It requires the outer skin the be cured first, an adhesive ply and then the rest of the lay up. It apperas they use prepeg cloth, close condition control in the cleanroom and tmp control of the prepeg itself make a big difference as well. It's time and money. How much are you prepared to pay is really the big question. Marcel ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 07, 2007
From: Larry Rosen <LarryRosen(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Cabin top too rough?
So what is a "metal adhesion spreader"? Is it just a flexible metal dry wall knife? RAS wrote: > > > Hi All, > > If you want a quick(er) fix for pinholes in composites and don't mind > spending a few dollars extra use "Static Conditioner" made by Akzo > Aerospace. It fills pinholes quite fast, dries in about half hour and > excess is then scraped of with a squeegee or similar. Use a tackrag to > remove dust, Don't use compressed air, Don't use any thinners! > Over this you spray a couple of coats of Laminar x-500 also by Akzo. > It seals in the Static conditioner. spray until a uniform white layer > covers all Static. Let this cure and wet sand to a smooth uniform > surface, with either 240 or 320 grit paper, by hand or orbital sander. > Look for pinholes, fill with bodyfiller, push hard on the filler to > force into the holes, scrape the excess, you want to fill a hole not > make your parts bigger or heavier. sand these spots either wet or dry > and apply thin coat of primer to show other surface imperfections, > fill them , sand and spot prime, apply topcoat. > I personally prefer to use a metal adhesion spreader to apply body > filler, the flex in the metal assists in forcing the filler into the > hole, it also makes it easier to scrape of the excess. Remove as much > excess as you can, it will save time, material and mess form sanding. > > I've painted numerous engine nacelles using above process when working > for Bombardier Aerospace in Belfast, N.Ireland. Bombardier used to > have a state of the art(years ago)composite factory which eventualy > expanded into former DeLorean factory as well. > The materials above are not the cheapest but they DO really work and > don't take forever and a day (no pun intended) to cure. > > If the company who makes the composites for vans can be persuaded to > use a two cure cycle rather than single cure the quality would be > improved quite a bit. It requires the outer skin the be cured first, > an adhesive ply and then the rest of the lay up. It apperas they use > prepeg cloth, close condition control in the cleanroom and tmp control > of the prepeg itself make a big difference as well. It's time and money. > How much are you prepared to pay is really the big question. > > Marcel > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 07, 2007
From: MauleDriver <MauleDriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: N591VU Flies
Congrats!!! pound, pound, pound, ..... Bill "tailcone rivets" Watson DejaVu wrote: > Gang, > Short summary, WOW, what a sense of accomplishment! > Flight was uneventful. D4A5 engine was healthy. Plane flew hands > off. A few pictures of the grin attached. Enjoy! > Keep pounding those rivets. > Anh > #141 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: N591VU Flies
From: "Michael Wellenzohn" <michael(at)wellenzohn.net>
Date: Jan 07, 2007
Herzlich Glckwunsch Anh! Best Regards and many happy landings from Switzerland. Michael (wings) www.wellenzohn.net -------- RV-10 builder (wings) #511 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86125#86125 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rob Wright" <armywrights(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: N591VU Flies
Date: Jan 07, 2007
Wonderful news, Anh! Hopefully right behind you in 6 months or so. Rob Wright #392 Fuel sys -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Michael Wellenzohn Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 3:33 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: N591VU Flies Herzlich Glckwunsch Anh! Best Regards and many happy landings from Switzerland. Michael (wings) www.wellenzohn.net -------- RV-10 builder (wings) #511 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86125#86125 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 07, 2007
From: Les Kearney <kearney(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: N591VU Flies
Congrats from Canada! Les Kearney RV10 #40643 - Lost in the empennage -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of DejaVu Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 11:47 PM Subject: RV10-List: N591VU Flies Gang, Short summary, WOW, what a sense of accomplishment! Flight was uneventful. D4A5 engine was healthy. Plane flew hands off. A few pictures of the grin attached. Enjoy! Keep pounding those rivets. Anh #141 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Fixitauto(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 07, 2007
Subject: Re: extra parts?
I've got parts left over and don't know where I left them out. They are part # F-1015E & F and 2 F-1016G. Can't find any referances to them in the plans. Or maybe I just don't know where to look. Anybody else run across this. Slow build fuselage. ROGER 40079 (Hoping they don't belong somewhere important and really hard to get to) ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: N591VU Flies
Date: Jan 08, 2007
From: "McGANN, Ron" <ron.mcgann(at)baesystems.com>
Ditto from South Australia :-> Ron McGann #187 Congrats from Canada! Les Kearney RV10 #40643 - Lost in the empennage -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of DejaVu Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 11:47 PM Subject: RV10-List: N591VU Flies Gang, Short summary, WOW, what a sense of accomplishment! Flight was uneventful. D4A5 engine was healthy. Plane flew hands off. A few pictures of the grin attached. Enjoy! Keep pounding those rivets. Anh #141 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: extra parts?
Date: Jan 07, 2007
From: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR(at)wernerco.com>
1015f is shown on page 29-9 and looks like it is a spacer in between the bulkhead to skin and 1016 parts are used in the passenger footwell area Hope this helps as a starting point to look for them. Dan _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Fixitauto(at)aol.com Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 6:40 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: extra parts? I've got parts left over and don't know where I left them out. They are part # F-1015E & F and 2 F-1016G. Can't find any referances to them in the plans. Or maybe I just don't know where to look. Anybody else run across this. Slow build fuselage. ROGER 40079 (Hoping they don't belong somewhere important and really hard to get to) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 07, 2007
From: PJ Seipel <seipel(at)seznam.cz>
Subject: Re: extra parts?
F-1015E is on page 26-3, F-1015F is on 29-9 , and F-1016G is on page 26-4. If you've already riveted that stuff together, then yep they're probably hard to get to... PJ RV-10 #40032 Fixitauto(at)aol.com wrote: > I've got parts left over and don't know where I left them out. > They are part # F-1015E & F and 2 F-1016G. Can't find any referances > to them in the plans. > Or maybe I just don't know where to look. Anybody else run across this. > Slow build fuselage. > > > ROGER 40079 (Hoping they don't belong somewhere important and really > hard to get to) > * > > > * ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GenGrumpy(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 07, 2007
Subject: Chelton nav databases
Tim, I looked thru both Chelton and Jeppesen web sites and I couldn't find any reference to the Chelton Nav Database downloads....... Did I miss something somewhere? grumpy ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Roy & Debbie" <roy.debbie(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel Filter Modifications
Date: Jan 07, 2007
I'm interested in the pictures and part numbers. ----- Original Message ----- From: David Boone To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 9:46 AM Subject: RV10-List: Fuel Filter Modifications My partner in crime, Richard Reynolds came up with a modification to address my concerns about the accessibility of the fuel filter in the tunnel "We" purchased two filters (approx $65 each) and installed one for each tank under the pilot and co-pilot seats. We also installed valves that can shut fuel off to the tanks so the tanks will not have to be drained in order to clean the filters. I used to be the quality manager of Holley Carb. and have seen significant automotive fuel contamination and suspect that the some of the same contamination issues apply to Avgas. Also the Left and Right filters add a little safety to the equation. If anyone is interested Richard can post some pictures in a couple weeks. 40138 David Boone and Richard Reynolds ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rob Wright" <armywrights(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: fuel valve lever
Date: Jan 07, 2007
Poking around Van's site; they've got a new product, direct replacement lever for the ugly stock lever on the fuel valve. Looks strangely like an Andair one, but you can see differences. It's under New Products in the catalog or you can search for part number FUEL VALVE LEVER Rob Wright #392 Finishing Fuel system install with Andair and extension, ordering interior paint this week ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007(at)cox.net>
Subject: Fuel Filter Modifications
Date: Jan 07, 2007
----- Original Message ----- From: David McNeill Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 8:10 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Fuel Filter Modifications Why would you have to drain the tanks anyway unless your fuel selector valve has no off position? My Andair valve has a left/right/off and is between the tank and the tunnel filter. tunnel access is accomplished by splitting the tunnel into two pieces. If you locate the fuel filters under the seats then you must dissasemble a portion of the seat structure and remove the seats which means removal of the flap torque tube covers. ----- Original Message ----- From: Roy & Debbie To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 7:19 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Fuel Filter Modifications I'm interested in the pictures and part numbers. ----- Original Message ----- From: David Boone To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 9:46 AM Subject: RV10-List: Fuel Filter Modifications My partner in crime, Richard Reynolds came up with a modification to address my concerns about the accessibility of the fuel filter in the tunnel "We" purchased two filters (approx $65 each) and installed one for each tank under the pilot and co-pilot seats. We also installed valves that can shut fuel off to the tanks so the tanks will not have to be drained in order to clean the filters. I used to be the quality manager of Holley Carb. and have seen significant automotive fuel contamination and suspect that the some of the same contamination issues apply to Avgas. Also the Left and Right filters add a little safety to the equation. If anyone is interested Richard can post some pictures in a couple weeks. 40138 David Boone and Richard Reynolds href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronic s.com/Navigator?RV10-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Jessen" <jjessen(at)rcn.com>
Subject: Test 1.2.3
Date: Jan 07, 2007
Sorry, I'm sending but the posts are not being posted. So, testing, 1.2.3 John J -- 6:29 PM ________________________________________________________________________________
From: cknauf(at)comcast.net
Subject: Lycoming O-320 on ebay
Date: Jan 08, 2007
There's a used Lycoming O-320-B3B for sale on ebay: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=013&sspagename=STRK%3AMESE%3AIT&viewitem=&item=230075395949&rd=1,1

There's a used Lycoming O-320-B3B for sale on ebay: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=013&sspagename=STRK%3AMESE%3AIT&viewitem=&item=230075395949&rd=1,1


      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: N591VU Flies
Date: Jan 07, 2007
From: "Scott Schmidt" <sschmidt(at)ussynthetic.com>
Great job Anh. I know you have been working hard on that plane for sometime. Looking forward to seeing sometime this year at a fly-in. Keep it up! -Scott Schmidt ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com on behalf of DejaVu Sent: Sat 1/6/2007 11:47 PM Subject: RV10-List: N591VU Flies Gang, Short summary, WOW, what a sense of accomplishment! Flight was uneventful. D4A5 engine was healthy. Plane flew hands off. A few pictures of the grin attached. Enjoy! Keep pounding those rivets. Anh #141 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dave Leikam" <DAVELEIKAM(at)wi.rr.com>
Subject: Re: N591VU Flies
Date: Jan 07, 2007
Congrats from Muskego, WI. OSH is in my backyard to the North, maybe we'll see you and your masterpiece there. Dave Leikam 40496 Emp assembly ----- Original Message ----- From: "McGANN, Ron" <ron.mcgann(at)baesystems.com> Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 7:03 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: N591VU Flies Ditto from South Australia :-> Ron McGann #187 Congrats from Canada! Les Kearney RV10 #40643 - Lost in the empennage -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of DejaVu Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 11:47 PM Subject: RV10-List: N591VU Flies Gang, Short summary, WOW, what a sense of accomplishment! Flight was uneventful. D4A5 engine was healthy. Plane flew hands off. A few pictures of the grin attached. Enjoy! Keep pounding those rivets. Anh #141 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 08, 2007
From: "Mike Lauritsen - Work" <mike(at)cleavelandtool.com>
Subject: Re: fuel valve lever
We have designed one also. Van's will be stocking ours soon as well. http://www.cleavelandtoolstore.com/prodinfo.asp?number=RVFS1 Mike On 1/7/07, Rob Wright wrote: > > Poking around Van's site; they've got a new product, direct replacement > lever for the ugly stock lever on the fuel valve. Looks strangely like an > Andair one, but you can see differences. > > > It's under New Products in the catalog or you can search for part number > FUEL VALVE LEVER > > > Rob Wright > > #392 > > Finishing Fuel system install with Andair and extension, ordering interior > paint this week > > * > > > * > > -- Mike Lauritsen Cleaveland Aircraft Tool 515-432-6794 www.cleavelandtool.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 08, 2007
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Cabin top too rough?
I used every tool I had in the shop. including a belt sander! I also used a rasp and coarse files to address some of the large ridges which result from the vacuum bagging. (ruined several files!) I did virtually all of my sanding by hand. SuperFil comes in 2 sizes and it's relatively expensive, I ordered the larger size which ships as 3 one gallon buckets. (1 part A; 2 part B). I bought it from Wicks Aircraft supply. And ordered the Smooth Prime (1 gal) at the same time. I've primed my doors and the inside of the Cabin cover and have gone through about 1/2 of the SmoothPrime. I don't know about it's shelf life. I hope to not have to worry about that. Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ Jay Brinkmeyer wrote: > >Regarding "HOURS and HOURS of sanding...". Can some of the sanding be done w/ a >conture type sander versus by hand? How much Superfil did you use and who sells >it for a reasonable price? Does it have a long shelf life? > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 08, 2007
From: "W. Curtis" <wcurtis(at)core.com>
Subject: RE: Fuel Filter Modifications
> My partner in crime, Richard Reynolds came up with a modification to >address my concerns about the accessibility of the fuel filter in the >tunnel "We" purchased two filters (approx $65 each) and installed one >for each tank under the pilot and co-pilot seats. Make sure when addressing one concern, you do not create others. In addition to what David said, have you plumbed a bypass valve into these under-seat filters? The stock Vans setup includes a bypass valve should the filter become clogged. This is unlikely in your dual setup, but should be considered. William Curtis - 40237 - SB fuse/finish http://wcurtis.nerv10.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Cabin top too rough?
Date: Jan 08, 2007
From: "Chris Johnston" <CJohnston(at)popsound.com>
Well, after wondering about whether the cabin top was too rough, I just went with it. I think that the roughness is cosmetic, and while I might be spending a bunch of hours smoothing, I'm going with it. by the by, I got the cabin top fit to the fuselage, and the fit is excellent. I think that smoothing and shaping with power tools was definitely the way to go for me. It might be that all my time working with shaping steel and fabricating working on race cars has finally paid off. I'm not sure I'd recommend that for everyone, as it's easy to take off too much, but for me, it's how I'm used to working. Your mileage may vary. Also, I spent some time working on my website. I finally scrapped the software I was using, and went a different way. I had to completely redo everything, but now it's easy to update, and works pretty well. anyway, you can check my cabin top fit here http://www.perfectlygoodairplane.net/Perfectlygoodairplane/More%20Canopy %20Trimming.html sweet. cj #40410 fuse www.perfectlygoodairplane.net -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 8:40 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Cabin top too rough? I used every tool I had in the shop. including a belt sander! I also used a rasp and coarse files to address some of the large ridges which result from the vacuum bagging. (ruined several files!) I did virtually all of my sanding by hand. SuperFil comes in 2 sizes and it's relatively expensive, I ordered the larger size which ships as 3 one gallon buckets. (1 part A; 2 part B). I bought it from Wicks Aircraft supply. And ordered the Smooth Prime (1 gal) at the same time. I've primed my doors and the inside of the Cabin cover and have gone through about 1/2 of the SmoothPrime. I don't know about it's shelf life. I hope to not have to worry about that. Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ Jay Brinkmeyer wrote: > >Regarding "HOURS and HOURS of sanding...". Can some of the sanding be done w/ a >conture type sander versus by hand? How much Superfil did you use and who sells >it for a reasonable price? Does it have a long shelf life? > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 08, 2007
From: "W. Curtis" <wcurtis(at)core.com>
Subject: RE: N591VU Flies
Ahn, Congratulations! I was thinking about you last week as I was laid up after pulling a muscle my back. I remember you injured you leg (arm?) that also put your construction on hold for a while. Great to see it all come together for you. I have to fly down there to the DC ADIZ and have a closer look. William Curtis http://nerv10.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 08, 2007
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting
I'm looking for a source that can do laser or water jet cutting of some subpanels for my instrument panel. Since I'm using a 'non-standard' panel it's not one of those supported on epanelbuilder. I have the capability to produce and send AutoCad compatible files. anybody know of a source? Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 08, 2007
From: "Mike Lauritsen - Work" <mike(at)cleavelandtool.com>
Subject: Re: Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting
Witte Industries in South Dakota is a new RV10 Builder... Ask for Michael. I understand they do 1 off parts. You may have luck with Precision H2O in Spokane, WA also, but they are more geared toward production. Mike On 1/8/07, Deems Davis wrote: > > > I'm looking for a source that can do laser or water jet cutting of some > subpanels for my instrument panel. Since I'm using a 'non-standard' > panel it's not one of those supported on epanelbuilder. I have the > capability to produce and send AutoCad compatible files. anybody know of > a source? > > Deems Davis # 406 > Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) > http://deemsrv10.com/ > > > > > -- Mike Lauritsen Cleaveland Aircraft Tool 515-432-6794 www.cleavelandtool.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "noel(at)blueskyaviation.net" <noel(at)blueskyaviation.net>
Subject: Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting
Date: Jan 08, 2007
Yes Deems, I have water-jet cutting available to me just had a panel cut for an RV-7 we are building=2E Also I did my labeling using Solid Works c ame out Fantastic!!! Best panel I have ever done!!! Noel -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web=2Ecom/ =2E ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 08, 2007
From: Jay Wik <jwik(at)crary.com>
Subject: Re: Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting
I know of a small one person shop. I know she laser's primarily acrylics but is accustomed to very small quantity requirements and likes the small niche markets. I'll ask on her experience and willingness for aluminum (I'm sure her laser has the wattage needed) and AutoCad in the next day or two unless someone comes up with something better. I've forgotten where you are, I'm in Fergus Falls MN. I'm not even close to this stage so I'd need to know approximate size and gauge of the parts. Deems Davis wrote: > > I'm looking for a source that can do laser or water jet cutting of > some subpanels for my instrument panel. Since I'm using a > 'non-standard' panel it's not one of those supported on epanelbuilder. > I have the capability to produce and send AutoCad compatible files. > anybody know of a source? > > Deems Davis # 406 > Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) > http://deemsrv10.com/ > >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 08, 2007
From: "Kelly McMullen" <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting
Deems, Pacific Southwest Avionics at Stellar does it, although when I wanted a couple holes enlarged to 3 ATI size they weren't interested, too small a job. He is mostly into redoing entire panels on certified planes. http://www.psavionics.com/ On 1/8/07, Deems Davis wrote: > > I'm looking for a source that can do laser or water jet cutting of some > subpanels for my instrument panel. Since I'm using a 'non-standard' > panel it's not one of those supported on epanelbuilder. I have the > capability to produce and send AutoCad compatible files. anybody know of > a source? > > Deems Davis # 406 > Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) > http://deemsrv10.com/ > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jesse Saint" <jesse(at)itecusa.org>
Subject: Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting
Date: Jan 08, 2007
Double R Manufacturing in Ocala, FL does it. They have done work for us. They price is good, but they have to be convinced a little bit to do such a small job. You can get them at www.doublermfg.com. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse(at)itecusa.org www.itecusa.org Cell: 352-427-0285 Fax: 815-377-3694 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 4:58 PM Subject: RV10-List: Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting I'm looking for a source that can do laser or water jet cutting of some subpanels for my instrument panel. Since I'm using a 'non-standard' panel it's not one of those supported on epanelbuilder. I have the capability to produce and send AutoCad compatible files. anybody know of a source? Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ > -- 6:29 PM ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Boone" <david555(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting
Date: Jan 08, 2007
Deems, I have a water jet and a CNC router. Call me @ 757 236 5110 and I'll discuss the pros and cons of the approaches to cutting the panel with each of these machines. I have cut test panels out of scrap High pressure laminate in order to tweak the panel layout prior to cutting the final panel. I created a frame designed with four subpanels so that I could remove one section without removing the others. Good Luck David O Boone 40138 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Deems Davis" <deemsdavis(at)cox.net> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 4:58 PM Subject: RV10-List: Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting > > I'm looking for a source that can do laser or water jet cutting of some > subpanels for my instrument panel. Since I'm using a 'non-standard' panel > it's not one of those supported on epanelbuilder. I have the capability to > produce and send AutoCad compatible files. anybody know of a source? > > Deems Davis # 406 > Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) > http://deemsrv10.com/ > >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Doble (Home Office)" <mikedoble(at)wi.rr.com>
Subject: Thanks for the web sites
Date: Jan 08, 2007
Thanks to all of you who make the effort to put up web sites. It's a wealth of information and motivation to someone like just getting started. Mike Waiting on EMP delivery; but I have all the tools!...... _____________________________ Michael P. Doble, P.E. Home Office W.249 S.7180 Center Drive Waukesha, WI 53189 Home: 262-662-9745 Mobile: 414-708-9466 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Chris Johnston Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 11:50 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Cabin top too rough? Well, after wondering about whether the cabin top was too rough, I just went with it. I think that the roughness is cosmetic, and while I might be spending a bunch of hours smoothing, I'm going with it. by the by, I got the cabin top fit to the fuselage, and the fit is excellent. I think that smoothing and shaping with power tools was definitely the way to go for me. It might be that all my time working with shaping steel and fabricating working on race cars has finally paid off. I'm not sure I'd recommend that for everyone, as it's easy to take off too much, but for me, it's how I'm used to working. Your mileage may vary. Also, I spent some time working on my website. I finally scrapped the software I was using, and went a different way. I had to completely redo everything, but now it's easy to update, and works pretty well. anyway, you can check my cabin top fit here http://www.perfectlygoodairplane.net/Perfectlygoodairplane/More%20Canopy %20Trimming.html sweet. cj #40410 fuse www.perfectlygoodairplane.net -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 8:40 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Cabin top too rough? I used every tool I had in the shop. including a belt sander! I also used a rasp and coarse files to address some of the large ridges which result from the vacuum bagging. (ruined several files!) I did virtually all of my sanding by hand. SuperFil comes in 2 sizes and it's relatively expensive, I ordered the larger size which ships as 3 one gallon buckets. (1 part A; 2 part B). I bought it from Wicks Aircraft supply. And ordered the Smooth Prime (1 gal) at the same time. I've primed my doors and the inside of the Cabin cover and have gone through about 1/2 of the SmoothPrime. I don't know about it's shelf life. I hope to not have to worry about that. Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ Jay Brinkmeyer wrote: > >Regarding "HOURS and HOURS of sanding...". Can some of the sanding be done w/ a >conture type sander versus by hand? How much Superfil did you use and who sells >it for a reasonable price? Does it have a long shelf life? > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ddddsp1(at)juno.com" <ddddsp1(at)juno.com>
Date: Jan 09, 2007
Subject: Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting
Noel, Can Solid Works do labeling on TEXTURED painted panels? Love to talk to you about it. You have a number I can call you at? Dean 40449 ________________________________________________________________________ FREE Reminder Service - NEW from AmericanGreetings.com Click HERE and never forget a Birthday or Anniversary again! http://track.juno.com/s/lc?s=197335&u=http://www.americangreetings.c om/products/online_calendar.pd

Noel,

Can Solid Works do labeling on TEXTURED painted panels?  Love to talk to you about it.  You have a number I can call you at?

Dean  40449 



______________________ __________________________________________________
FREE Reminder Service - NEW from AmericanGreetings.com
Click HERE and never forget a Birthday or Anniversary again!
< br>

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Thanks for the web sites
From: "Michael Wellenzohn" <michael(at)wellenzohn.net>
Date: Jan 09, 2007
Hi Mike, I also use the websites before I go for the next steps. Sofar I didn't find many details regarding QB Wings but will post them on my website as I go along. Regarding your tools, I find out with every new Kit what tools I miss. Have fun building Michael (QB Wings) http://www.wellenzohn.net -------- RV-10 builder (wings) #511 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86508#86508 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "noel(at)blueskyaviation.net" <noel(at)blueskyaviation.net>
Date: Jan 09, 2007
Subject: Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting
Solid works just created the "art work" for the labiling. using trexure I think (the people on the list may know better) you will want silk screeaning witch will need the same Art work as I created for labeling. Blue Sky Aviation, Inc. 406-538-6574 www.blueskyaviation.net -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ . ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Eric Parlow" <ericparlow(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Removable Steps?
Date: Jan 09, 2007
Has anyone considered a removable step to reduce drag? ERic 40014 Finishing ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 09, 2007
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Removable Steps?
There is a retractable step kit for the 6A..... -----Original Message----- >From: Eric Parlow <ericparlow(at)hotmail.com> >Sent: Jan 9, 2007 1:15 PM >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV10-List: Removable Steps? > > >Has anyone considered a removable step to reduce drag? > >ERic >40014 >Finishing > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Gonzalez" <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com>
Subject: Removable Steps?
Date: Jan 09, 2007
Mine are removable, but not for drag reasons, but to get the fuselage out of my basement. Making them removable as I have, shows me that it is too difficult to take these on and off for the reasons of flight. You could make custom receivers that the step tube could insert into, but you would have to modify the existing step by cutting off the tube from the step and re welding a smaller tube that would go into the old one which is anchorred into the fuselage. Personally, I think its more work than its worth. Better to gap seal all your control surfaces. John G. #409 >From: "Eric Parlow" <ericparlow(at)hotmail.com> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV10-List: Removable Steps? >Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:15:29 -0500 > > >Has anyone considered a removable step to reduce drag? > >ERic >40014 >Finishing > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Derburring Rib Flange Slots
From: "arthurww" <arthur(at)cftech.co.uk>
Date: Jan 09, 2007
Looked at the ribs for the VS last night. Alot of head scratching... how on earth am I supposed to deburr those flange slots? How have you done it? Can anyone point me towards that magic tool? Regards Arthur -------- #40641 EMP Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86619#86619 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/p1010007_275.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 09, 2007
From: "Mike Lauritsen - Work" <mike(at)cleavelandtool.com>
Subject: Re: Derburring Rib Flange Slots
I drag scotch brite through folded in half On 1/9/07, arthurww wrote: > > > Looked at the ribs for the VS last night. > > Alot of head scratching... how on earth am I supposed > to deburr those flange slots? > How have you done it? > > Can anyone point me towards that magic tool? > Regards > Arthur > > -------- > #40641 EMP > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86619#86619 > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/p1010007_275.jpg > > -- Mike Lauritsen Cleaveland Aircraft Tool 515-432-6794 www.cleavelandtool.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 09, 2007
From: MauleDriver <MauleDriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Derburring Rib Flange Slots
I learned from the folks at the Alexander Tech Center to do it with the scotchbrite wheels. Not pretty but fast and effective. Don't know how I would explain it though. I'm curious what others do too. arthurww wrote: > > Looked at the ribs for the VS last night. > > Alot of head scratching... how on earth am I supposed > to deburr those flange slots? > How have you done it? > > Can anyone point me towards that magic tool? > Regards > Arthur > > -------- > #40641 EMP > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86619#86619 > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/p1010007_275.jpg > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 09, 2007
From: "Mike Lauritsen - Work" <mike(at)cleavelandtool.com>
Subject: Re: Derburring Rib Flange Slots
I do that to the outside... you get the inside? On 1/9/07, MauleDriver wrote: > > > I learned from the folks at the Alexander Tech Center to do it with the > scotchbrite wheels. Not pretty but fast and effective. Don't know how > I would explain it though. I'm curious what others do too. > > arthurww wrote: > > > > Looked at the ribs for the VS last night. > > > > Alot of head scratching... how on earth am I supposed > > to deburr those flange slots? > > How have you done it? > > > > Can anyone point me towards that magic tool? > > Regards > > Arthur > > > > -------- > > #40641 EMP > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86619#86619 > > > > > > > > > > Attachments: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/p1010007_275.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Mike Lauritsen Cleaveland Aircraft Tool 515-432-6794 www.cleavelandtool.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Van's shipping department, where did everyone go??
From: Michael D Chase <MChase(at)gdatp.com>
Date: Jan 09, 2007
Eric, Thanks sounds like I need to think about ordering now, or more accurately do my taxes to make sure I can afford to order them:-). You mentioned fuel sendors, over to the crowd what else do you I need to order with the wings? I am trying to go cheap so am not planning on doing anything to fancy, just lights and an attempt at a cheap IFR cockpit, if such a thing exists.. Michael Chase General Dynamics Armament and Technical Products 802-657-6029 Office 802-922-5930 Cell mchase(at)gdatp.com This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is private, confidential, or exempt from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, copying, printing, disclosure, retention, or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply to this e-mail, and delete all copies without disclosing this message to others. Thank you. "Eric_Kallio" Sent by: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com 01/06/2007 09:48 AM Please respond to rv10-list To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com cc: Subject: RV10-List: Re: Van's shipping department, where did everyone go?? I just got my standard or slow-build wings in November. It took 8 weeks to get them shipped. I ordered some parts such as the fuel senders and some tubing. 2 weeks after the order was placed it finally showed up. As for the tailcone I spent about 85 hours on it. Eric Kallio 40518-leading edges Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85843#85843 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Gonzalez" <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Derburring Rib Flange Slots
Date: Jan 09, 2007
Get one of those black emery boards with the cushioned backing at the pharmacy. They work great. Each side has a different coarseness. The round part of the flange can be down done with the deburring blade tool. JOhn G. >From: "Mike Lauritsen - Work" <mike(at)cleavelandtool.com> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: RV10-List: Derburring Rib Flange Slots >Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:13:59 -0600 > >I drag scotch brite through folded in half > > >On 1/9/07, arthurww wrote: >> >> >>Looked at the ribs for the VS last night. >> >>Alot of head scratching... how on earth am I supposed >>to deburr those flange slots? >>How have you done it? >> >>Can anyone point me towards that magic tool? >>Regards >>Arthur >> >>-------- >>#40641 EMP >> >> >> >> >>Read this topic online here: >> >>http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86619#86619 >> >> >> >> >>Attachments: >> >>http://forums.matronics.com//files/p1010007_275.jpg >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >-- >Mike Lauritsen >Cleaveland Aircraft Tool >515-432-6794 >www.cleavelandtool.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Derburring Rib Flange Slots
From: "arthurww" <arthur(at)cftech.co.uk>
Date: Jan 09, 2007
I am getting some emery cloth strip (p400) to try, but will have to work out a good way to hold the parts because you need 2 hands for the strip..... -------- #40641 EMP Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86663#86663 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 09, 2007
From: Rick <ricksked(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Derburring Rib Flange Slots
Lowes sells these mini scotchbrite wheels for Dremel tools and Sears has some cone shaped deburring bits made of similar material. They make quick work of doing the flanges..Hehe....glad I'm done with that task Drive on for all you guys looking at that stinking pile of wing ribs!! ;) Rick S. 40185 RV-10 composite parts ________________________________________________________________________________
From: kilopapa(at)antelecom.net
Subject: Re: Derburring Rib Flange Slots
Date: Jan 09, 2007
Try 600 silicon carbide sandpaper on a tongue depressor. Kevin 40494 > > >Looked at the ribs for the VS last night. > >Alot of head scratching... how on earth am I supposed >to deburr those flange slots? >How have you done it? > >Can anyone point me towards that magic tool? >Regards >Arthur > >-------- >#40641 EMP > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86619#86619 > > >Attachments: > >http://forums.matronics.com//files/p1010007_275.jpg > > >== > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ddddsp1(at)juno.com" <ddddsp1(at)juno.com>
Date: Jan 10, 2007
Subject: First 100 FLYING RV-10's List
I was browsing thru the website and ran across the list ( http://www.vansairforce.net/rv10.htm) that was started tracking the Fi rst 100 Flying RV-10's. Vic Syracuse was #11 (the last one to post his f lying RV-10). Maybe those currently flying wanna post their planes to ge t the list current? I know there should be 60 or more on the list by now ! (Tim, Jesse, Ray, Russ, Bill, etc.) BTW......I wanna thank Ray Doer r for giving me my first RV ride and FIRST (at full gross)RV-10 ride. I cannot say enough about how well the RV-10 performs. If only I could f ast forward the completion on mine to get in the air tomorrow. Good luc k on your IFR check ride RAY! Thanks again! Dean 40449 ________________________________________________________________________ FREE Reminder Service - NEW from AmericanGreetings.com Click HERE and never forget a Birthday or Anniversary again! http://track.juno.com/s/lc?s=197335&u=http://www.americangreetings.c om/products/online_calendar.pd
I was browsing thru the website and ran across the list
( http://www.vansairforce.net/rv10.htm>) that wa s started tracking the First 100 Flying RV-10's. Vic Syracuse was #11 (t he last one to post his flying RV-10). Maybe those currently flying wann a post their planes to get the list current? I know there should be 60 o r more on the list by now! (Tim, Jesse, Ray, Russ, Bill, etc.) &nbs p;
 
BTW......I wanna thank Ray Doerr for giving me my first RV ride and FIRST (at full gross)RV-10 ride.  I cannot say enough about how we ll the RV-10 performs.  If only I could fast forward the completion on mine to get in the air tomorrow.  Good luck on your IFR check r ide RAY!  Thanks again!

Dean 40449


______________________ __________________________________________________
FREE Reminder Service - NEW from AmericanGreetings.com
Click HERE and never forget a Birthday or Anniversary again!
< br>

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Distance between Mains revisited
Date: Jan 10, 2007
From: "McGANN, Ron" <ron.mcgann(at)baesystems.com>
G'day all, Significant progress over the holidays has seen installation of the mains, engine mount and nose gear/wheel assemblies. I remember a thread last year about distance between the mains and comments that an 8' door width should be ok. I checked my plans and the A0 orthographic drawing identified as DWG 1 shows a distance of 7'4" (88") between bottom main centres. I measured my door openings and they came in at 94" - no problemo (me thinks). The bad news came tonight. Because of the camber, the maximum distance between the outside edges of the mains is 94.5" (with no weight on the gear). !@#$%^&*( It will fit through if I remove the wheels. I have also read a suggestion to squeeze the legs together using a strap. Can anyone vouch for that method? Some rough geometry suggests the fuse will fit if it is manouvered sideways through the door (rather than straight through) - has anyone had any success? Looking for the path of least resistance. It's a pity Vans does not provide USEFUL measurements with their plans. not so cheery tonight Ron ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Stella" <sstella(at)incisaledge.com>
Subject: Derburring Rib Flange Slots
Date: Jan 10, 2007
I was able to use a scotchbrite wheel from the outside of the slot to get most of it, then I used the pads to finish it off. Steve Stella 40654 Emp -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of arthurww Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 4:01 PM Subject: RV10-List: Derburring Rib Flange Slots Looked at the ribs for the VS last night. Alot of head scratching... how on earth am I supposed to deburr those flange slots? How have you done it? Can anyone point me towards that magic tool? Regards Arthur -------- #40641 EMP Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86619#86619 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/p1010007_275.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 10, 2007
From: MauleDriver <MauleDriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Derburring Rib Flange Slots
I think we only hit the outside and touched up the inside with the pad - it's been awhile. Since then, I tried the various powered mini-wheels and pad holders but it looks like John G's nail file pads are the ticket. You definitely want a couple of those in the tool box. Mike Lauritsen - Work wrote: > I do that to the outside... you get the inside? > > On 1/9/07, *MauleDriver* > wrote: > > > > > I learned from the folks at the Alexander Tech Center to do it > with the > scotchbrite wheels. Not pretty but fast and effective. Don't > know how > I would explain it though. I'm curious what others do too. > > arthurww wrote: > > > > > > Looked at the ribs for the VS last night. > > > > Alot of head scratching... how on earth am I supposed > > to deburr those flange slots? > > How have you done it? > > > > Can anyone point me towards that magic tool? > > Regards > > Arthur > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting
Date: Jan 10, 2007
From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com>
Gary, just a question based on A & P school experience. Why would anyone grind a fin on an engine rather than have the errant clearance corrected by a properly modified engine mount? Does anyone know if VANS is yet properly modifying the mount or will Deems' be the first sole with a third generation modification? I am waiting with anticipation to hear that his mount was a first generation "non modified" variety. On a second note, How does BPA feel about kit builders grinding their engine components? This might just be an important point on Safety being passed over by the reading audience. John Cox (back from CES '2007) ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com on behalf of gary Sent: Wed 1/10/2007 3:59 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting I needed to grind off some of the fins on the bottom ob my cold air induction sump to give the clearance I was comfortable with. Gary 40274 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:11 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting I have an interference issue with the lower crossmember. With the 2 bottom mounts and bolts in place the bottom of the sump is resting on the cross member and the top ears/mounts are 1/8-3/16" off. I'm not sure if it's a problem with the mount, (unlikely) as Scott Risan @ Van's said the made a change to the position of the cross member after Tim reported his situation. It's more likely due to the Cold Air Induction system which has a custom cast oil sump that in all likelihood varies somewhat from Lycoming stock. When talking to Scott , who was EXTREMELY helpful. He said that after the change they made they had reports of some engines where the tolerance was VERY close, but mine was the 1st incident since of an obstruction. He wanted to check the mount to make sure something hadn't changed in their process. (I received my mount Aug 06). The mount is in transit to Van's this week, Scott said the fix only takes 1/2 hour and he'd return it as soon as possible. Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Seat adjustment lever
Date: Jan 10, 2007
From: "Tom Deutsch" <deutscht(at)rhwhotels.com>
I have ordered a set to these seat adjustment levers and one broke on first test use. They have a week spot where the lever attached to the lift pin for the seat adjustment. I sent it back to Greg, with no questions asked he acknowledged the problem, designed a fix and sent me a new set. I haven't tried the new ones yet but they look much better. Just be sure not to lift the handle too far and advise your passengers not to either. It's great to work with people like Greg. Tom Deutsch, #40545 Office 913 451-1222 Fax 913 451-6493 Cell 913 908-7752 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jim & Julie Wade Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2006 6:21 AM Subject: RV10-List: Seat adjustment lever This seat adjustment lever is great. Just bought if from Greg, I was to busy trying to finish to build one myself. His is well made and a good design. So much better that having to reach beside the seat and pull the lever. Here is his website, check it out for yourself. http://www.nwacaptain.com/ Blue Skies Jim 40383 DAR next saturday (I hope)!!!!! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=60549#60549 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "gary" <speckter(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting
Date: Jan 10, 2007
OK for you inquiring minds. BPA suggested grinding off the fins to fit the mount. BPA sump has very tall fins for cooling on it and it does not hurt it to grind off some for clearance. Vans won't talk to us BPA users because we are "Hot Roders". They told me I was on my own on that. Wonderful Aircraft and for the most part a good company, but sometimes they just drive you nuts. Gary 40274 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John W. Cox Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 3:44 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting Gary, just a question based on A & P school experience. Why would anyone grind a fin on an engine rather than have the errant clearance corrected by a properly modified engine mount? Does anyone know if VANS is yet properly modifying the mount or will Deems' be the first sole with a third generation modification? I am waiting with anticipation to hear that his mount was a first generation "non modified" variety. On a second note, How does BPA feel about kit builders grinding their engine components? This might just be an important point on Safety being passed over by the reading audience. John Cox (back from CES '2007) _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com on behalf of gary Sent: Wed 1/10/2007 3:59 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting I needed to grind off some of the fins on the bottom ob my cold air induction sump to give the clearance I was comfortable with. Gary 40274 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:11 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting I have an interference issue with the lower crossmember. With the 2 bottom mounts and bolts in place the bottom of the sump is resting on the cross member and the top ears/mounts are 1/8-3/16" off. I'm not sure if it's a problem with the mount, (unlikely) as Scott Risan @ Van's said the made a change to the position of the cross member after Tim reported his situation. It's more likely due to the Cold Air Induction system which has a custom cast oil sump that in all likelihood varies somewhat from Lycoming stock. When talking to Scott , who was EXTREMELY helpful. He said that after the change they made they had reports of some engines where the tolerance was VERY close, but mine was the 1st incident since of an obstruction. He wanted to check the mount to make sure something hadn't changed in their process. (I received my mount Aug 06). The mount is in transit to Van's this week, Scott said the fix only takes 1/2 hour and he'd return it as soon as possible. Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting
Date: Jan 10, 2007
From: "BPA" <BPA(at)bpaengines.com>
John, The area of the sump that seems to be causing interference issues on some of the RV-10 mounts are fins on the bottom of the sump in the very rear under the oil pickup on the casting. These fins are there for no particular reason other than aesthetics (looks cool). On the first couple of sumps that we supplied for the RV-10's with this interference problem, we used a die grinder and removed the fins without getting into the 'meat' or integral part of the sump. Tim had a fit issue with the standard sump and Van's determined that there may be slight differences in the PMA sump based most likely on vendor changes, and modified his mount. We've seen this as well on other components. From what I gathered through the RV-10 list the original design was modified to accept these variances. As it turns out, this may not be the case. There is no reason, safety wise that the fins cannot be removed for clearance purposes. A better solution in my opinion would be to change the bar on the bottom of the mount. This can be done by the vendor that supplies the mounts to Van's, or I have a contact here in Oklahoma who will gladly do the work. Regards, Allen Barrett Barrett Precision Engines, Inc. www.barretprecisionengines.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John W. Cox Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 2:44 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting Gary, just a question based on A & P school experience. Why would anyone grind a fin on an engine rather than have the errant clearance corrected by a properly modified engine mount? Does anyone know if VANS is yet properly modifying the mount or will Deems' be the first sole with a third generation modification? I am waiting with anticipation to hear that his mount was a first generation "non modified" variety. On a second note, How does BPA feel about kit builders grinding their engine components? This might just be an important point on Safety being passed over by the reading audience. John Cox (back from CES '2007) ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com on behalf of gary Sent: Wed 1/10/2007 3:59 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting I needed to grind off some of the fins on the bottom ob my cold air induction sump to give the clearance I was comfortable with. Gary 40274 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:11 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting I have an interference issue with the lower crossmember. With the 2 bottom mounts and bolts in place the bottom of the sump is resting on the cross member and the top ears/mounts are 1/8-3/16" off. I'm not sure if it's a problem with the mount, (unlikely) as Scott Risan @ Van's said the made a change to the position of the cross member after Tim reported his situation. It's more likely due to the Cold Air Induction system which has a custom cast oil sump that in all likelihood varies somewhat from Lycoming stock. When talking to Scott , who was EXTREMELY helpful. He said that after the change they made they had reports of some engines where the tolerance was VERY close, but mine was the 1st incident since of an obstruction. He wanted to check the mount to make sure something hadn't changed in their process. (I received my mount Aug 06). The mount is in transit to Van's this week, Scott said the fix only takes 1/2 hour and he'd return it as soon as possible. Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Gonzalez" <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com>
Subject: Seat adjustment lever
Date: Jan 10, 2007
Incorrect engine mount bolts, an engine mount that doesn't leave enough space for the engine and now a seat adjustment lever which breaks off. Hey Deems, what movie did you end up seeing the other night. John Cox, I am not passing over a safety issue, just hoping to install a different engine. Unfortunately can't change the seats out. I am a little perplexed about why this stuff is happening. JOhn G. >From: "Tom Deutsch" <deutscht(at)rhwhotels.com> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: RE: RV10-List: Seat adjustment lever >Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:58:09 -0600 > > >I have ordered a set to these seat adjustment levers and one broke on >first test use. They have a week spot where the lever attached to the >lift pin for the seat adjustment. I sent it back to Greg, with no >questions asked he acknowledged the problem, designed a fix and sent me >a new set. I haven't tried the new ones yet but they look much better. >Just be sure not to lift the handle too far and advise your passengers >not to either. > >It's great to work with people like Greg. > >Tom Deutsch, #40545 > >Office 913 451-1222 >Fax 913 451-6493 >Cell 913 908-7752 > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jim & >Julie Wade >Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2006 6:21 AM >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV10-List: Seat adjustment lever > > > >This seat adjustment lever is great. Just bought if from Greg, I was to >busy trying to finish to build one myself. His is well made and a good >design. So much better that having to reach beside the seat and pull the >lever. Here is his website, check it out for yourself. >http://www.nwacaptain.com/ > >Blue Skies >Jim >40383 >DAR next saturday (I hope)!!!!! > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=60549#60549 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Fuel level sender installation on QB Wings
From: "Michael Wellenzohn" <michael(at)wellenzohn.net>
Date: Jan 10, 2007
Hello, for those who chose QB wings do you know a "sophisticated" way to proberly ajust the fuel level sender in the tank. I feel like I would need to bend the lever by chance in a direction and try if it clears the vent line. I use the multimeter to measure the travel but I cant see what stops it to go all the way up. Thanks Michael www.wellenzohn.net -------- RV-10 builder (wings) #511 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86813#86813 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting
Date: Jan 10, 2007
From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com>
Thanks for the reply. Grinding can induce microscopic fractures. In school we had to Dye-Pen the work to confirm acceptance and no cracks. At work, we just yell for an NDT specialist to get off their butt and co-sign our artwork (its a little more complex than that actually). My partner in school thought he would be cute and sand blasted it which effectively hid the cracks. It was nearly a failure of the class for failing to willfully not following approved Lycoming procedures. I am a supporter of sound mods. Am guessing you have escaped the "Golden BB" on this one. For those who read these posts, I hope the exercise was of value. My solution, find an approved and certified aircraft welder of 4130 and make the mount correct. It sure seems we get shoe-horned into a tight pair at times. Now how lucky was Deem's to get Scott in a gracious moment to send it back to VANS for his BPA hot rod to get it done right at the source. Could there be a safety mod in the wind for us Slow Bloomers? John ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com on behalf of gary Sent: Wed 1/10/2007 1:27 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting OK for you inquiring minds. BPA suggested grinding off the fins to fit the mount. BPA sump has very tall fins for cooling on it and it does not hurt it to grind off some for clearance. Vans won't talk to us BPA users because we are "Hot Roders". They told me I was on my own on that. Wonderful Aircraft and for the most part a good company, but sometimes they just drive you nuts. Gary 40274 ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John W. Cox Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 3:44 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting Gary, just a question based on A & P school experience. Why would anyone grind a fin on an engine rather than have the errant clearance corrected by a properly modified engine mount? Does anyone know if VANS is yet properly modifying the mount or will Deems' be the first sole with a third generation modification? I am waiting with anticipation to hear that his mount was a first generation "non modified" variety. On a second note, How does BPA feel about kit builders grinding their engine components? This might just be an important point on Safety being passed over by the reading audience. John Cox (back from CES '2007) ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com on behalf of gary Sent: Wed 1/10/2007 3:59 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting I needed to grind off some of the fins on the bottom ob my cold air induction sump to give the clearance I was comfortable with. Gary 40274 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:11 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting I have an interference issue with the lower crossmember. With the 2 bottom mounts and bolts in place the bottom of the sump is resting on the cross member and the top ears/mounts are 1/8-3/16" off. I'm not sure if it's a problem with the mount, (unlikely) as Scott Risan @ Van's said the made a change to the position of the cross member after Tim reported his situation. It's more likely due to the Cold Air Induction system which has a custom cast oil sump that in all likelihood varies somewhat from Lycoming stock. When talking to Scott , who was EXTREMELY helpful. He said that after the change they made they had reports of some engines where the tolerance was VERY close, but mine was the 1st incident since of an obstruction. He wanted to check the mount to make sure something hadn't changed in their process. (I received my mount Aug 06). The mount is in transit to Van's this week, Scott said the fix only takes 1/2 hour and he'd return it as soon as possible. Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 10, 2007
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Engine mount
When I talked to Van's, I told Scott Risan that my engine was an experimental Lycoming built by BPE and Scott said that he knew "that those guys in OKLA cast there own sumps". It didn't seem to be an issue with him. Scott was EXTREMELY helpful, offered to pay the shipping. (I agreed to split it with him). I didn't think that grinding the rear of the fins would have given me the clearance I wanted/needed.With the fins ground, I _might_ have been able to get it hung and to get the upper mount/bolts in, but the clearance with the cross member would have been too tight to provide peace of mind for the engine settling when the mounts compress over time. Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ gary wrote: > OK for you inquiring minds. BPA suggested grinding off the fins to fit > the mount. BPA sump has very tall fins for cooling on it and it does > not hurt it to grind off some for clearance. > > Vans wont talk to us BPA users because we are Hot Roders. They told > me I was on my own on that. Wonderful Aircraft and for the most part a > good company, but sometimes they just drive you nuts. > > Gary > > 40274 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *John W. Cox > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 10, 2007 3:44 PM > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* RE: RV10-List: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet > cutting > > Gary, just a question based on A & P school experience. Why would > anyone grind a fin on an engine rather than have the errant clearance > corrected by a properly modified engine mount? > > Does anyone know if VANS is yet properly modifying the mount or will > Deems' be the first sole with a third generation modification? I am > waiting with anticipation to hear that his mount was a first > generation "non modified" variety. > > On a second note, How does BPA feel about kit builders grinding their > engine components? This might just be an important point on Safety > being passed over by the reading audience. > > John Cox > > (back from CES '2007) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com on behalf of gary > *Sent:* Wed 1/10/2007 3:59 AM > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* RE: RV10-List: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet > cutting > > > I needed to grind off some of the fins on the bottom ob my cold air > induction sump to give the clearance I was comfortable with. > Gary > 40274 > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:11 AM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet > cutting > > > I have an interference issue with the lower crossmember. With the 2 > bottom mounts and bolts in place the bottom of the sump is resting on > the cross member and the top ears/mounts are 1/8-3/16" off. I'm not sure > if it's a problem with the mount, (unlikely) as Scott Risan @ Van's said > the made a change to the position of the cross member after Tim reported > his situation. It's more likely due to the Cold Air Induction system > which has a custom cast oil sump that in all likelihood varies somewhat > from Lycoming stock. When talking to Scott , who was EXTREMELY helpful. > He said that after the change they made they had reports of some engines > where the tolerance was VERY close, but mine was the 1st incident since > of an obstruction. He wanted to check the mount to make sure something > hadn't changed in their process. (I received my mount Aug 06). The mount > is in transit to Van's this week, Scott said the fix only takes 1/2 > hour and he'd return it as soon as possible. > > Deems Davis # 406 > Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) > http://deemsrv10.com/ > >* > > >* > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Seat adjustment lever
Date: Jan 10, 2007
From: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR(at)wernerco.com>
The seat has a modification from the factory. There is nothing wrong with the seats as delivered, it is when you modify them and extend the lever out front that there is an issue. Dan -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Gonzalez Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 4:48 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Seat adjustment lever Incorrect engine mount bolts, an engine mount that doesn't leave enough space for the engine and now a seat adjustment lever which breaks off. Hey Deems, what movie did you end up seeing the other night. John Cox, I am not passing over a safety issue, just hoping to install a different engine. Unfortunately can't change the seats out. I am a little perplexed about why this stuff is happening. JOhn G. >From: "Tom Deutsch" <deutscht(at)rhwhotels.com> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: RE: RV10-List: Seat adjustment lever >Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:58:09 -0600 > > >I have ordered a set to these seat adjustment levers and one broke on >first test use. They have a week spot where the lever attached to the >lift pin for the seat adjustment. I sent it back to Greg, with no >questions asked he acknowledged the problem, designed a fix and sent me >a new set. I haven't tried the new ones yet but they look much better. >Just be sure not to lift the handle too far and advise your passengers >not to either. > >It's great to work with people like Greg. > >Tom Deutsch, #40545 > >Office 913 451-1222 >Fax 913 451-6493 >Cell 913 908-7752 > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jim & >Julie Wade >Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2006 6:21 AM >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV10-List: Seat adjustment lever > > > >This seat adjustment lever is great. Just bought if from Greg, I was to >busy trying to finish to build one myself. His is well made and a good >design. So much better that having to reach beside the seat and pull the >lever. Here is his website, check it out for yourself. >http://www.nwacaptain.com/ > >Blue Skies >Jim >40383 >DAR next saturday (I hope)!!!!! > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=60549#60549 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Seat adjustment lever
Date: Jan 10, 2007
From: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR(at)wernerco.com>
I also have these on order can you verify if they are hollow 1/2" tube or solid bar stock? THX Dan -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tom Deutsch Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 3:58 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Seat adjustment lever I have ordered a set to these seat adjustment levers and one broke on first test use. They have a week spot where the lever attached to the lift pin for the seat adjustment. I sent it back to Greg, with no questions asked he acknowledged the problem, designed a fix and sent me a new set. I haven't tried the new ones yet but they look much better. Just be sure not to lift the handle too far and advise your passengers not to either. It's great to work with people like Greg. Tom Deutsch, #40545 Office 913 451-1222 Fax 913 451-6493 Cell 913 908-7752 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jim & Julie Wade Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2006 6:21 AM Subject: RV10-List: Seat adjustment lever This seat adjustment lever is great. Just bought if from Greg, I was to busy trying to finish to build one myself. His is well made and a good design. So much better that having to reach beside the seat and pull the lever. Here is his website, check it out for yourself. http://www.nwacaptain.com/ Blue Skies Jim 40383 DAR next saturday (I hope)!!!!! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=60549#60549 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Distance between Mains revisited
Date: Jan 11, 2007
From: "McGANN, Ron" <ron.mcgann(at)baesystems.com>
Thanks Jesse, I'll give one/both methods a try. I have removed the 'do not arch...' from your response below - there is waaaay too much useful info that is excluded from the archives. cheers Ron -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com on behalf of Jesse Saint Sent: Wed 10/01/2007 22:54 Subject: RE: RV10-List: Distance between Mains revisited I can vouch both for the straps and for cocking it off to the side a little. The fuse will fit in a standard shipping container (without the rods for the wheel pants), but needs a strap and needs to be turned a little to fit in. Getting out of the garage door should not be too hard if you turn it to the side a little, get one wheel out and then slide it over a little to get the other out. Either or both of these methods should help you get the plane out without taking it off the gear. You will save a max of maybe an inch or two without the wheels on, I think, but it looks like you only need another half an inch. I think one of the above methods should take care of you for just half and inch. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse(at)itecusa.org www.itecusa.org Cell: 352-427-0285 Fax: 815-377-3694 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of McGANN, Ron Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 6:44 AM Subject: RV10-List: Distance between Mains revisited G'day all, Significant progress over the holidays has seen installation of the mains, engine mount and nose gear/wheel assemblies. I remember a thread last year about distance between the mains and comments that an 8' door width should be ok. I checked my plans and the A0 orthographic drawing identified as DWG 1 shows a distance of 7'4" (88") between bottom main centres. I measured my door openings and they came in at 94" - no problemo (me thinks). The bad news came tonight. Because of the camber, the maximum distance between the outside edges of the mains is 94.5" (with no weight on the gear). !@#$%^&*( It will fit through if I remove the wheels. I have also read a suggestion to squeeze the legs together using a strap. Can anyone vouch for that method? Some rough geometry suggests the fuse will fit if it is manouvered sideways through the door (rather than straight through) - has anyone had any success? Looking for the path of least resistance. It's a pity Vans does not provide USEFUL measurements with their plans. not so cheery tonight Ron ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Seat adjustment lever
Date: Jan 10, 2007
From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com>
Word from another more advanced builder (EH) was they are just too swamped at VANS to make the simple mods. That's good news for everyone... Right? In their defense, they are alway (well almost) willing to help builders complete a safe and exciting aircraft. You would not understand what hoops they have to jump through. Having written FAA Approved training manuals and finding a single word in the regs that was written incorrectly, I learned that it took two years and $400,000 to change published documents into the correct legaleze. ONE SINGLE WORD. No one likes a reality check. Just wait until carbon fiber replacement canopies with close tolerance door fitment, wingtips that fit the first time, aerodynamic wheelpants with 30% less frontal area and speed fairings are offered - After market. Just like the Wholly Cowl, if you build an improved product, a properly functioning marketplace will wear a grooved path to your door. It is all about market driven QC. Make it better, make it safer, make it quicker, make it cheaper, make it easy to locate. Then tell Tim about it. This list has been instrumental in moving the mountain one yard at a time in the best of all directions. Towards safe flight. John G, I have a record with several builders of helping with those Alternate engines choices. I even foster passion for a new engine cowl which will tackle other Lycoming variants. Just make sure the quality or safety is not compromised in the pursuit of improvement. Keep us informed. On the seat handle issue, I know Mike Dennis and he will not leave testing and product improvement to sit idle. Tell Oregon Aeroa about Greg Hales mousetrap. John c. ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com on behalf of John Gonzalez Sent: Wed 1/10/2007 1:48 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Seat adjustment lever Incorrect engine mount bolts, an engine mount that doesn't leave enough space for the engine and now a seat adjustment lever which breaks off. Hey Deems, what movie did you end up seeing the other night. John Cox, I am not passing over a safety issue, just hoping to install a different engine. Unfortunately can't change the seats out. I am a little perplexed about why this stuff is happening. JOhn G. >From: "Tom Deutsch" <deutscht(at)rhwhotels.com> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: RE: RV10-List: Seat adjustment lever >Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:58:09 -0600 > > >I have ordered a set to these seat adjustment levers and one broke on >first test use. They have a week spot where the lever attached to the >lift pin for the seat adjustment. I sent it back to Greg, with no >questions asked he acknowledged the problem, designed a fix and sent me >a new set. I haven't tried the new ones yet but they look much better. >Just be sure not to lift the handle too far and advise your passengers >not to either. > >It's great to work with people like Greg. > >Tom Deutsch, #40545 > >Office 913 451-1222 >Fax 913 451-6493 >Cell 913 908-7752 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Engine mount
Date: Jan 10, 2007
From: "Randy DeBauw" <Randy(at)abros.com>
Just to let everyone know, I talked to the guy at Van's that welds the engine mounts. They are made in house. I asked about the bar hitting on Tim's and he said that the bar was an after thought for some added strength. He said it could have gone anywhere between the two down tubes. On the 220RV it cleared just fine and on my engine that I bought used and had rebuilt if fit fine. He did say that they had moved the bar down and shouldn't be a problem any more if you have a pan like Tim's. Well it looks like they may have to move it again. Randy 40006 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 2:02 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Engine mount When I talked to Van's, I told Scott Risan that my engine was an experimental Lycoming built by BPE and Scott said that he knew "that those guys in OKLA cast there own sumps". It didn't seem to be an issue with him. Scott was EXTREMELY helpful, offered to pay the shipping. (I agreed to split it with him). I didn't think that grinding the rear of the fins would have given me the clearance I wanted/needed.With the fins ground, I _might_ have been able to get it hung and to get the upper mount/bolts in, but the clearance with the cross member would have been too tight to provide peace of mind for the engine settling when the mounts compress over time. Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ gary wrote: > OK for you inquiring minds. BPA suggested grinding off the fins to fit > the mount. BPA sump has very tall fins for cooling on it and it does > not hurt it to grind off some for clearance. > > Vans won't talk to us BPA users because we are "Hot Roders". They told > me I was on my own on that. Wonderful Aircraft and for the most part a > good company, but sometimes they just drive you nuts. > > Gary > > 40274 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *John W. Cox > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 10, 2007 3:44 PM > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* RE: RV10-List: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet > cutting > > Gary, just a question based on A & P school experience. Why would > anyone grind a fin on an engine rather than have the errant clearance > corrected by a properly modified engine mount? > > Does anyone know if VANS is yet properly modifying the mount or will > Deems' be the first sole with a third generation modification? I am > waiting with anticipation to hear that his mount was a first > generation "non modified" variety. > > On a second note, How does BPA feel about kit builders grinding their > engine components? This might just be an important point on Safety > being passed over by the reading audience. > > John Cox > > (back from CES '2007) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com on behalf of gary > *Sent:* Wed 1/10/2007 3:59 AM > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* RE: RV10-List: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet > cutting > > > I needed to grind off some of the fins on the bottom ob my cold air > induction sump to give the clearance I was comfortable with. > Gary > 40274 > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:11 AM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet > cutting > > > I have an interference issue with the lower crossmember. With the 2 > bottom mounts and bolts in place the bottom of the sump is resting on > the cross member and the top ears/mounts are 1/8-3/16" off. I'm not sure > if it's a problem with the mount, (unlikely) as Scott Risan @ Van's said > the made a change to the position of the cross member after Tim reported > his situation. It's more likely due to the Cold Air Induction system > which has a custom cast oil sump that in all likelihood varies somewhat > from Lycoming stock. When talking to Scott , who was EXTREMELY helpful. > He said that after the change they made they had reports of some engines > where the tolerance was VERY close, but mine was the 1st incident since > of an obstruction. He wanted to check the mount to make sure something > hadn't changed in their process. (I received my mount Aug 06). The mount > is in transit to Van's this week, Scott said the fix only takes 1/2 > hour and he'd return it as soon as possible. > > Deems Davis # 406 > Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) > http://deemsrv10.com/ > >* > > >* > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 10, 2007
From: "Kelly McMullen" <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Engine mount was - Source for Laser/WaterJet cutting
What's your target now John? Osh 2020? or Copperstate 2015? On 1/10/07, John W. Cox wrote: Could there be a safety mod in the wind for us Slow Bloomers? > > John > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 10, 2007
From: jerry petersen <bldanrv9a(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Distance between Mains revisited
Sounds like you could get by by removing one main wheel and devising a teporary caster wheel or slide to get it out the door and remount the main. We had to get ours lower and narrower to get it out the door and divised a temporary axle inside the hollow portion of the main gear and put a small wheel on it. Lots of ways to do it. Good luck. Jerry --- "McGANN, Ron" wrote: > > > Thanks Jesse, I'll give one/both methods a try. I > have removed the 'do not arch...' from your response > below - there is waaaay too much useful info that is > excluded from the archives. > > cheers > Ron > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com on behalf > of Jesse Saint > Sent: Wed 10/01/2007 22:54 > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RE: RV10-List: Distance between Mains > revisited > > > > I can vouch both for the straps and for cocking it > off to the side a little. > The fuse will fit in a standard shipping container > (without the rods for the > wheel pants), but needs a strap and needs to be > turned a little to fit in. > Getting out of the garage door should not be too > hard if you turn it to the > side a little, get one wheel out and then slide it > over a little to get the > other out. Either or both of these methods should > help you get the plane > out without taking it off the gear. You will save a > max of maybe an inch or > two without the wheels on, I think, but it looks > like you only need another > half an inch. I think one of the above methods > should take care of you for > just half and inch. > > Jesse Saint > I-TEC, Inc. > jesse(at)itecusa.org > www.itecusa.org > Cell: 352-427-0285 > Fax: 815-377-3694 > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On > Behalf Of McGANN, Ron > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 6:44 AM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Distance between Mains revisited > > G'day all, > > Significant progress over the holidays has seen > installation of the mains, > engine mount and nose gear/wheel assemblies. I > remember a thread last year > about distance between the mains and comments that > an 8' door width should > be ok. I checked my plans and the A0 orthographic > drawing identified as DWG > 1 shows a distance of 7'4" (88") between bottom main > centres. I measured my > door openings and they came in at 94" - no problemo > (me thinks). The bad > news came tonight. > > Because of the camber, the maximum distance between > the outside edges of the > mains is 94.5" (with no weight on the gear). > !@#$%^&*( > > It will fit through if I remove the wheels. I have > also read a suggestion > to squeeze the legs together using a strap. Can > anyone vouch for that > method? Some rough geometry suggests the fuse will > fit if it is manouvered > sideways through the door (rather than straight > through) - has anyone had > any success? > > Looking for the path of least resistance. > > It's a pity Vans does not provide USEFUL > measurements with their plans. > > not so cheery tonight > Ron > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 10, 2007
From: Les Kearney <kearney(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Stuff to order with the fuse kit.
Hi I just received notification from Van's that my fuse kit (slow build) will ship in early Feb. Is there anything I should be ordering from Van's as well? As I am doing QB wings, Van's advised that I need the wing center section so I have that covered. I have also ordered the RV10 flap positioner kit. I thought I might order 25' of plastic conduit for the fuse wiring as well. Should I get the strobe kit now or wait? All suggestions gratefully accepted. Inquiring minds need to know... Les Kearney RV10 # 40643 - Lost in the empennage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Gonzalez" <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com>
Subject: Stuff to order with the fuse kit.
Date: Jan 10, 2007
Get the fifty feet of conduit and save yourself a second shipping bill and handling fee. John G. 409 >From: Les Kearney <kearney(at)shaw.ca> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV10-List: Stuff to order with the fuse kit. >Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:13:34 -0700 > >Hi > > >I just received notification from Van's that my fuse kit (slow build) will >ship in early Feb. Is there anything I should be ordering from Van's as >well? As I am doing QB wings, Van's advised that I need the wing center >section so I have that covered. I have also ordered the RV10 flap >positioner >kit. > > >I thought I might order 25' of plastic conduit for the fuse wiring as well. >Should I get the strobe kit now or wait? All suggestions gratefully >accepted. > > >Inquiring minds need to know... > > >Les Kearney > >RV10 # 40643 - Lost in the empennage > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "RV_10" <john_rv10(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Fuel level sender installation on QB Wings
Date: Jan 11, 2007
Michael, We have just done that step. One side required no adjustment but the other needed to have the float offset about half an inch. Here's what we eventually did that worked well for us on the one we had to adjust:- * Mark on the skin where the rib is * Remove the sender and hold it parallel with the tank face and in line with the hole. Have the float resting on the skin outside the hole. * Note how far it has to be moved to fit between the rib and the breather tube * Hold the float wire in a vice between two pieces of wood and bend a =91dog leg=92 into the relevant straight piece to move the float sideways as much as you need and keep it parallel to where it originally was * Make sure the original right angle bends are retained at right angles otherwise the float will not move in the one plane I hope this is of some use, John -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Michael Wellenzohn Sent: Thursday, 11 January 2007 8:56 AM Subject: RV10-List: Fuel level sender installation on QB Wings Hello, for those who chose QB wings do you know a "sophisticated" way to proberly ajust the fuel level sender in the tank. I feel like I would need to bend the lever by chance in a direction and try if it clears the vent line. I use the multimeter to measure the travel but I can=C2=B4t see what stops it to go all the way up. Thanks Michael www.wellenzohn.net -------- RV-10 builder (wings) #511 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86813#86813 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fuel level sender installation on QB Wings
From: "Michael Wellenzohn" <michael(at)wellenzohn.net>
Date: Jan 11, 2007
Hello John, thank you for your help. I'll try this tonight! Michael -------- RV-10 builder (wings) #511 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86875#86875 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jesse Saint" <jesse(at)itecusa.org>
Subject: Stuff to order with the fuse kit.
Date: Jan 11, 2007
I wouldn't order the strobe kit yet. That mounts, normally, back by the battery in the tail. It might not be a bad idea to order Van's strobe/ELT mount kit so you can get that installed ahead of time. Some people at this point would order some antennas if they are going to be mounted in a place that will be hard to get to later. Some would go ahead and start on your wiring and panel installations. If you are going with Van's wiring harness (which really is a good place to start if you are a beginner in wiring and plan to do it yourself), then it would be a good thing to go ahead and get. The Flap Positioning system might be a good thing to order now if you are going to get it so you can find a good place to mount it before getting too far along. I would go ahead and decide what conduit you are going to use and get that as well as any mounting hardware you might want. If you are going to make access panels in the rear seat floors or baggage floors, you might want to get the access panel parts like were used in the stall warning installation in the wing. Go ahead and get some extra snap bushings if you are going to use more than that normal amount of wiring run holes. This is everything that comes to mind. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse(at)itecusa.org www.itecusa.org Cell: 352-427-0285 Fax: 815-377-3694 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Les Kearney Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 11:14 PM Subject: RV10-List: Stuff to order with the fuse kit. Hi I just received notification from Van's that my fuse kit (slow build) will ship in early Feb. Is there anything I should be ordering from Van's as well? As I am doing QB wings, Van's advised that I need the wing center section so I have that covered. I have also ordered the RV10 flap positioner kit. I thought I might order 25' of plastic conduit for the fuse wiring as well. Should I get the strobe kit now or wait? All suggestions gratefully accepted. Inquiring minds need to know... Les Kearney RV10 # 40643 - Lost in the empennage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Gonzalez" <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com>
Subject: Stuff to order with the fuse kit.
Date: Jan 11, 2007
Snap bushings, rubber grommets of many large sizes, extra rivets both solid and blind rivets, some extra aluminum to make the stiffners for the access panels, get the strobe wires, the wire for mics and headphone jacks. Wire for any interior lighting after you think about where it will be mounted. Get the battery cable you will be using. Sorry, this is all I can come up with but I know there is more. JOhn G. >From: "Jesse Saint" <jesse(at)itecusa.org> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: RE: RV10-List: Stuff to order with the fuse kit. >Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:07:51 -0500 > >I wouldn't order the strobe kit yet. That mounts, normally, back by the >battery in the tail. It might not be a bad idea to order Van's strobe/ELT >mount kit so you can get that installed ahead of time. Some people at this >point would order some antennas if they are going to be mounted in a place >that will be hard to get to later. Some would go ahead and start on your >wiring and panel installations. If you are going with Van's wiring harness >(which really is a good place to start if you are a beginner in wiring and >plan to do it yourself), then it would be a good thing to go ahead and get. >The Flap Positioning system might be a good thing to order now if you are >going to get it so you can find a good place to mount it before getting too >far along. I would go ahead and decide what conduit you are going to use >and get that as well as any mounting hardware you might want. If you are >going to make access panels in the rear seat floors or baggage floors, you >might want to get the access panel parts like were used in the stall >warning >installation in the wing. Go ahead and get some extra snap bushings if you >are going to use more than that normal amount of wiring run holes. > > >This is everything that comes to mind. > > >Jesse Saint > >I-TEC, Inc. > >jesse(at)itecusa.org > >www.itecusa.org > >Cell: 352-427-0285 > >Fax: 815-377-3694 > > _____ > >From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Les Kearney >Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 11:14 PM >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV10-List: Stuff to order with the fuse kit. > > >Hi > > >I just received notification from Van's that my fuse kit (slow build) will >ship in early Feb. Is there anything I should be ordering from Van's as >well? As I am doing QB wings, Van's advised that I need the wing center >section so I have that covered. I have also ordered the RV10 flap >positioner >kit. > > >I thought I might order 25' of plastic conduit for the fuse wiring as well. >Should I get the strobe kit now or wait? All suggestions gratefully >accepted. > > >Inquiring minds need to know... > > >Les Kearney > >RV10 # 40643 - Lost in the empennage > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Stuff to order with the fuse kit.
Date: Jan 11, 2007
From: "Vern W. Smith" <Vern(at)teclabsinc.com>
Van's has a strobe power supply mount you may want to look at. Also this is a good time to decide if you are going to stick with Van's aluminum heat bypass valves (part # TG 10 L & R they mount on the forward side of the fire wall) or replace them with stainless aftermarket valves. Don at www.aviacompworldwide.com makes a nice set. If you go this way delete the originals out of the fuselage kit and save the 20% restocking fee from Van's. Difference in cost between the stainless and aluminum original equipment is about $60. Do get the extra rivets. AN426 3-4; 3-4.5; 3-5; 4-5; 4-6; 4-7. I've run into a number of places were the rivets called out were too short or of marginal length. The primary offenders seem to need the 3-4 and 4-5. If you are thinking about a Trutrak autopilot you could get the servo mounts and wire harness. No need to get the servos yet. I've had great customer service from www.steinair.com. This is more of a wings item. Nice choice on QB wings and SB fuselage. I've done everything slow build and am really enjoying building fuselage. Vern (#324 fuselage) -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Gonzalez Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 7:48 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Stuff to order with the fuse kit. Snap bushings, rubber grommets of many large sizes, extra rivets both solid and blind rivets, some extra aluminum to make the stiffners for the access panels, get the strobe wires, the wire for mics and headphone jacks. Wire for any interior lighting after you think about where it will be mounted. Get the battery cable you will be using. Sorry, this is all I can come up with but I know there is more. JOhn G. >From: "Jesse Saint" <jesse(at)itecusa.org> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: RE: RV10-List: Stuff to order with the fuse kit. >Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:07:51 -0500 > >I wouldn't order the strobe kit yet. That mounts, normally, back by the >battery in the tail. It might not be a bad idea to order Van's strobe/ELT >mount kit so you can get that installed ahead of time. Some people at this >point would order some antennas if they are going to be mounted in a place >that will be hard to get to later. Some would go ahead and start on your >wiring and panel installations. If you are going with Van's wiring harness >(which really is a good place to start if you are a beginner in wiring and >plan to do it yourself), then it would be a good thing to go ahead and get. >The Flap Positioning system might be a good thing to order now if you are >going to get it so you can find a good place to mount it before getting too >far along. I would go ahead and decide what conduit you are going to use >and get that as well as any mounting hardware you might want. If you are >going to make access panels in the rear seat floors or baggage floors, you >might want to get the access panel parts like were used in the stall >warning >installation in the wing. Go ahead and get some extra snap bushings if you >are going to use more than that normal amount of wiring run holes. > > >This is everything that comes to mind. > > >Jesse Saint > >I-TEC, Inc. > >jesse(at)itecusa.org > >www.itecusa.org > >Cell: 352-427-0285 > >Fax: 815-377-3694 > > _____ > >From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Les Kearney >Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 11:14 PM >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV10-List: Stuff to order with the fuse kit. > > >Hi > > >I just received notification from Van's that my fuse kit (slow build) will >ship in early Feb. Is there anything I should be ordering from Van's as >well? As I am doing QB wings, Van's advised that I need the wing center >section so I have that covered. I have also ordered the RV10 flap >positioner >kit. > > >I thought I might order 25' of plastic conduit for the fuse wiring as well. >Should I get the strobe kit now or wait? All suggestions gratefully >accepted. > > >Inquiring minds need to know... > > >Les Kearney > >RV10 # 40643 - Lost in the empennage > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jay Rowe" <jfrjr(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel level sender installation on QB Wings
Date: Jan 11, 2007
Michael: I adjusted, readjusted, adjusted, readjusted, etc. and could never get good clearance---even had a old gastrocopy scope from work that gave me a very good picture of what was happening. Ended up rotating the float 90 degrees to get better clearance. Checked this with Van's and they said "no problem". Of course, I am only on the fuse now so it hasn't been "flight tested". Jay Rowe 40301 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Wellenzohn" <michael(at)wellenzohn.net> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 4:55 PM Subject: RV10-List: Fuel level sender installation on QB Wings > > > Hello, > > for those who chose QB wings do you know a "sophisticated" way to proberly > ajust the fuel level sender in the tank. > I feel like I would need to bend the lever by chance in a direction and > try if it clears the vent line. I use the multimeter to measure the travel > but I cant see what stops it to go all the way up. > > Thanks > Michael > > www.wellenzohn.net > > -------- > RV-10 builder (wings) > #511 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86813#86813 > > > -- > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Derburring Rib Flange Slots
From: "arthurww" <arthur(at)cftech.co.uk>
Date: Jan 11, 2007
I think I may have found that magic tool... 3M (of course) do a 3mm thick unitized cut & polish wheel. Available in 3 diameters 38, 50 & 75mm. Tried one tonight in a right angle die grinder... seemed to work very well and quite quick. Regards Arthur -------- #40641 EMP Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86986#86986 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: VS Rib Holes
From: "arthurww" <arthur(at)cftech.co.uk>
Date: Jan 11, 2007
Does anyone know what the 3/16 holes are for in the VS ribs? Regards Arthur -------- #40641 EMP Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86987#86987 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: VS Rib Holes
Date: Jan 11, 2007
From: "Randy DeBauw" <Randy(at)abros.com>
Tooling holes used to locate the part so it can be formed. Randy 40006 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of arthurww Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 3:49 PM Subject: RV10-List: VS Rib Holes Does anyone know what the 3/16 holes are for in the VS ribs? Regards Arthur -------- #40641 EMP Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86987#86987 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 11, 2007
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: VS Rib Holes
They are used in the manufacturing process to hold the material in position while it's being cut/formed. Deems Davis # 406 Finishing - ( A Misnomer ! ) http://deemsrv10.com/ arthurww wrote: > >Does anyone know what the 3/16 holes are for in the VS ribs? >Regards >Arthur > >-------- >#40641 EMP > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ddddsp1(at)juno.com" <ddddsp1(at)juno.com>
Date: Jan 12, 2007
Subject: Re: Fuel level sender installation on QB Wings
Jay, If you search the archives on this topic you will find several suggestio ns. Larry Rosen tipped me off on how to get them set up. I did what yo u did...........turn the float 90 degrees. Used an OHM meter to verify I had complete travel on both senders.. Dean 40449 ________________________________________________________________________ FREE Reminder Service - NEW from AmericanGreetings.com Click HERE and never forget a Birthday or Anniversary again! http://track.juno.com/s/lc?s=197335&u=http://www.americangreetings.c om/products/online_calendar.pd?c=uol5752

Jay,

If you search the archives on this topic you will find several sugges tions.  Larry Rosen tipped me off on how to get them set up.  I did what you did...........turn the float 90 degrees.   Used an OHM meter to verify I had complete travel on both senders..

Dean 40449



______________________ __________________________________________________
FREE Remin der Service - NEW from AmericanGreetings.com
Click HERE and never forget a Birthday or Anniversary again!
< br>

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fuel level sender installation on QB Wings
From: "Michael Wellenzohn" <michael(at)wellenzohn.net>
Date: Jan 12, 2007
Guys, just to make sure I got that right. You are actually turning the float that way that the circle surface points up, correct? Cheers Michael -------- RV-10 builder (wings) #511 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=87027#87027 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jay Rowe" <jfrjr(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel level sender installation on QB Wings
Date: Jan 12, 2007
Michael: That's correct. The float is postioned such that it's longest dimension is now vertical. It gives you a little more than a half inch clearance on each side of the float. You don't get quite as much "throw" on the lever arm as you would if the float was horizontally postioned but I plan to take that into consideration when I calibrate the fuel gauges. I wish I had taken some pictures but I don't have that capability on my gastroscope. Jay ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Wellenzohn" <michael(at)wellenzohn.net> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 3:43 AM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Fuel level sender installation on QB Wings > > > Guys, just to make sure I got that right. You are actually turning the > float that way that the circle surface points up, correct? > > Cheers > Michael > > -------- > RV-10 builder (wings) > #511 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=87027#87027 > > > -- > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fuel level sender installation on QB Wings
From: "Michael Wellenzohn" <michael(at)wellenzohn.net>
Date: Jan 12, 2007
Thanks Jay, I'll see how it works. Michael -------- RV-10 builder (wings) #511 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=87047#87047 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jeff Carpenter <jeff(at)westcottpress.com>
Subject: Re: Fuel level sender installation on QB Wings
Date: Jan 12, 2007
For what it's worth, Vans is working on Capacitance Senders for the 10... although last I checked they didn't have a ready date. I've left the baffles off the tanks for now and moved on. Plenty to do before I have to close them up. Jeff Carpenter 40304 Fuse Inventory Complete On Jan 11, 2007, at 2:20 PM, Jay Rowe wrote: > > Michael: I adjusted, readjusted, adjusted, readjusted, etc. and > could never get good clearance---even had a old gastrocopy scope > from work that gave me a very good picture of what was happening. > Ended up rotating the float 90 degrees to get better clearance. > Checked this with Van's and they said "no problem". Of course, I > am only on the fuse now so it hasn't been "flight tested". Jay > Rowe 40301 > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Wellenzohn" > > To: > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 4:55 PM > Subject: RV10-List: Fuel level sender installation on QB Wings > > >> >> >> Hello, >> >> for those who chose QB wings do you know a "sophisticated" way to >> proberly ajust the fuel level sender in the tank. >> I feel like I would need to bend the lever by chance in a >> direction and try if it clears the vent line. I use the multimeter >> to measure the travel but I cant see what stops it to go all the >> way up. >> >> Thanks >> Michael >> >> www.wellenzohn.net >> >> -------- >> RV-10 builder (wings) >> #511 >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86813#86813 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 12, 2007
From: "Mike Lauritsen - Work" <mike(at)cleavelandtool.com>
Subject: Re: Derburring Rib Flange Slots
If you guys want them, I can supply them. I found that both those and the bristle disks will wear very quickly, thus I didn't think they were a good value. But I am happy to stock anything that is in demand :) If you would like them email me directly. Thanks, Mike -- Mike Lauritsen Cleaveland Aircraft Tool 515-432-6794 www.cleavelandtool.com On 1/11/07, arthurww wrote: > > > I think I may have found that magic tool... > 3M (of course) do a 3mm thick unitized cut & polish wheel. > Available in 3 diameters 38, 50 & 75mm. > Tried one tonight in a right angle die grinder... seemed to work very well > and quite quick. > Regards > Arthur > > -------- > #40641 EMP > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=86986#86986 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: IFR Training and Checkride in an RV-10
Date: Jan 12, 2007
From: "Doerr, Ray R [NTK]" <Ray.R.Doerr(at)sprint.com>
As of Jan 11, 2007, I have successfully pass my IFR checkride with Ron Albertson (Awesome guy by the way). I just wanted to let other builders of the RV-10 know that it is awesome to receive your entire IRF training like I did in your own RV-10. And then be able to find an examiner willing to do the checkride in an experimental airplane. Ron had only one experience in an experimental prior to do the checkride in my RV-10. He flew a Burt Rutan design and told the owner "Thanks" but that he would never fly that again. Since that was his only experience with experimental, I made it my duty to try and change his mind. So after we finished the checkride, some of his comments were, "Awesome IFR Panel", this was mainly because he liked the Dynon EFIS and EMS and the dual Garmin 430's that he had 1,000 of hours flying behind. "Wow", this was when I climbed out at 100 Knots and 1500 Ft/Min with full fuel. "Very Stable IFR Platform", this was when he took the stick for unusual attitudes, better known as "Instructor Fun Time". After the checkride I was confident that I had changed the mind of this one very highly qualified Professional on the point of Experimental Aircraft, specifically the Van's RV-10. The checkride consisted of: File IFR to Topeka, KS Billard (KTOP) for the VOR 22 7 DME ARC. This was a non-precision approach using the autopilot. I was not ready for this because, I had thought he would have wanted this hand flown as I have practiced 10 times before. Anyway the TruTrak DigiFlight II with GPSS worked awesome. It flew us directly to the IAF (KUMGY) on the Arc, then the autopilot flew the Arc while I monitored the distance from the VOR. Then at DMARCY, and Intermediate fix, the autopilot cranked it 90 degrees to the left to fly the 25 degree radial (Heading 205) to the station, then after crossing the VOR, it changed to the 214 degree radial directly to the runway. All I had to do during this time is monitor the approach using the VOR driving the #1 CDI, while my #2 CDI was indicating if I was on the arc/radial via the GPS. Next up was the Missed approach back to the hold, where we did a couple of turns and then back into KTOP for the ILS 13 using Vectors from Kansas City Center. Center was extremely busy at this point and they forgot about me after the last 90 degree intercept they gave me. After blowing through the localizer (communication was none top, otherwise, I would have warned them) by 2 miles, they apologized and asked if I wanted to be vector around again or would take a hard left directly to the FAF. I told the hard left, and I crank it around, intercepted the localizer about 1 mile from the FAF, had to loose 1000 ft and get everything lined up. Examiner was pretty quiet at this time and minute later I had everything lined up and flew the needles in the doughnut the rest of the way down to minimums. Now it was time to go missed and cancel IFR and go out and do maneuvers. We did a couple of unusual attitudes, turns, climbs etc. Last up was the non-precision GPS approach back into my home airport (K34). Ron gave me vectors to final. This approach was flown with no Dynon EFIS, so I had to use my mechanical AIS, ALT, VSI and TruTrak Turn Coorinator. This approached ended by doing a circling to land at minimums. I hard a very smooth landing and Ron commented that I did an A+ job, and that I knew the airplane well. I guess anyone who has built there own airplane can definitely say that! In summary, I was a 100 hour pilot when I started flying my RV-10 (First flight May 26, 2006). I had logged a long cross country to Canada and Oshkosh in it and then other numerous smaller ones. I had received about 44 hours of dual from my CFII Andy Crabtree (Now building a RV-7) in my RV-10. I had 51 hours of Actual/Simulated IFR at the time of this checkride. Now I am at the 300 hour mark as a pilot and the plane has 212 on the Hobbs. This couldn't get any better than this. Sorry to be so wordy, but as you can tell, I was pumped! Thank You Ray Doerr CDNI Principal Engineer Sprint PCS 16020 West 113th Street Lenexa, KS 66219 Mailstop KSLNXK0101 (913) 859-1414 (Office) (913) 226-0106 (Pcs) (913) 859-1234 (Fax) Ray.R.Doerr(at)sprint.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jeff Carpenter <jeff(at)westcottpress.com>
Subject: Re: Derburring Rib Flange Slots
Date: Jan 12, 2007
Hi Mike, While you're talking about stocking things... I was on the ezburr (www.ezburr.com) website the other day and saw that they will custom manufacture bits that drill and deburr in one step. I didn't delve into it enough to determine the costs involved, but it seems to me that it's something that you could pursue and offer to the builders if the economies of scale work out. Jeff Carpenter 40304 I was on the Burr Away On Jan 12, 2007, at 7:08 AM, Mike Lauritsen - Work wrote: > If you guys want them, I can supply them. I found that both those > and the bristle disks will wear very quickly, thus I didn't think > they were a good value. But I am happy to stock anything that is > in demand :) If you would like them email me directly. > > Thanks, > Mike > > -- > Mike Lauritsen > Cleaveland Aircraft Tool > 515-432-6794 > www.cleavelandtool.com > > > On 1/11/07, arthurww wrote: > > I think I may have found that magic tool... > 3M (of course) do a 3mm thick unitized cut & polish wheel. > Available in 3 diameters 38, 50 & 75mm. > Tried one tonight in a right angle die grinder... seemed to work > very well > and quite quick. > Regards > Arthur > > -------- > #40641 EMP > > > Read this topic online here: > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 12, 2007
From: "Mike Lauritsen - Work" <mike(at)cleavelandtool.com>
Subject: Re: Derburring Rib Flange Slots
Checking into it. Stock they start at 3/8". These cutters were designed to use in a milling machine or a very rigid application. I know that builders have had mixed results, some swear by them, some swear at them. I am willing to try it to see if there is a better solution out there. For those that use them, do you still deburr the two sides that are between the parts (inside of the skin, outside of the substructure)? Mike On 1/12/07, Jeff Carpenter wrote: > > Hi Mike, > While you're talking about stocking things... I was on the ezburr ( > www.ezburr.com) website the other day and saw that they will custom > manufacture bits that drill and deburr in one step. I didn't delve into it > enough to determine the costs involved, but it seems to me that it's > something that you could pursue and offer to the builders if the economies > of scale work out. > > Jeff Carpenter > 40304 > > I was on the Burr Away > On Jan 12, 2007, at 7:08 AM, Mike Lauritsen - Work wrote: > > If you guys want them, I can supply them. I found that both those and the > bristle disks will wear very quickly, thus I didn't think they were a good > value. But I am happy to stock anything that is in demand :) If you would > like them email me directly. > > Thanks, > Mike > > -- > Mike Lauritsen > Cleaveland Aircraft Tool > 515-432-6794 > www.cleavelandtool.com > > > On 1/11/07, arthurww wrote: > > > > > > I think I may have found that magic tool... > > 3M (of course) do a 3mm thick unitized cut & polish wheel. > > Available in 3 diameters 38, 50 & 75mm. > > Tried one tonight in a right angle die grinder... seemed to work very > > well > > and quite quick. > > Regards > > Arthur > > > > -------- > > #40641 EMP > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > > > > > > > * > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com > * > > > * > > > * > > -- Mike Lauritsen Cleaveland Aircraft Tool 515-432-6794 www.cleavelandtool.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: IFR Training and Checkride in an RV-10
Date: Jan 12, 2007
From: "Tom Deutsch" <deutscht(at)rhwhotels.com>
Ray, you are to be commended for your efforts! It is quite a feat to become IFR rated with only 300 hours. (even though I have flown with you and know you are a good pilot) I look forward to having you teach me to fly my 10 IFR. Enjoy the rating and let's keep each other current! Tom Deutsch, Office 913 451-1222 Fax 913 451-6493 Cell 913 908-7752 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Doerr, Ray R [NTK] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 9:41 AM Subject: RV10-List: IFR Training and Checkride in an RV-10 As of Jan 11, 2007, I have successfully pass my IFR checkride with Ron Albertson (Awesome guy by the way). I just wanted to let other builders of the RV-10 know that it is awesome to receive your entire IRF training like I did in your own RV-10. And then be able to find an examiner willing to do the checkride in an experimental airplane. Ron had only one experience in an experimental prior to do the checkride in my RV-10. He flew a Burt Rutan design and told the owner "Thanks" but that he would never fly that again. Since that was his only experience with experimental, I made it my duty to try and change his mind. So after we finished the checkride, some of his comments were, "Awesome IFR Panel", this was mainly because he liked the Dynon EFIS and EMS and the dual Garmin 430's that he had 1,000 of hours flying behind. "Wow", this was when I climbed out at 100 Knots and 1500 Ft/Min with full fuel. "Very Stable IFR Platform", this was when he took the stick for unusual attitudes, better known as "Instructor Fun Time". After the checkride I was confident that I had changed the mind of this one very highly qualified Professional on the point of Experimental Aircraft, specifically the Van's RV-10. The checkride consisted of: File IFR to Topeka, KS Billard (KTOP) for the VOR 22 7 DME ARC. This was a non-precision approach using the autopilot. I was not ready for this because, I had thought he would have wanted this hand flown as I have practiced 10 times before. Anyway the TruTrak DigiFlight II with GPSS worked awesome. It flew us directly to the IAF (KUMGY) on the Arc, then the autopilot flew the Arc while I monitored the distance from the VOR. Then at DMARCY, and Intermediate fix, the autopilot cranked it 90 degrees to the left to fly the 25 degree radial (Heading 205) to the station, then after crossing the VOR, it changed to the 214 degree radial directly to the runway. All I had to do during this time is monitor the approach using the VOR driving the #1 CDI, while my #2 CDI was indicating if I was on the arc/radial via the GPS. Next up was the Missed approach back to the hold, where we did a couple of turns and then back into KTOP for the ILS 13 using Vectors from Kansas City Center. Center was extremely busy at this point and they forgot about me after the last 90 degree intercept they gave me. After blowing through the localizer (communication was none top, otherwise, I would have warned them) by 2 miles, they apologized and asked if I wanted to be vector around again or would take a hard left directly to the FAF. I told the hard left, and I crank it around, intercepted the localizer about 1 mile from the FAF, had to loose 1000 ft and get everything lined up. Examiner was pretty quiet at this time and minute later I had everything lined up and flew the needles in the doughnut the rest of the way down to minimums. Now it was time to go missed and cancel IFR and go out and do maneuvers. We did a couple of unusual attitudes, turns, climbs etc. Last up was the non-precision GPS approach back into my home airport (K34). Ron gave me vectors to final. This approach was flown with no Dynon EFIS, so I had to use my mechanical AIS, ALT, VSI and TruTrak Turn Coorinator. This approached ended by doing a circling to land at minimums. I hard a very smooth landing and Ron commented that I did an A+ job, and that I knew the airplane well. I guess anyone who has built there own airplane can definitely say that! In summary, I was a 100 hour pilot when I started flying my RV-10 (First flight May 26, 2006). I had logged a long cross country to Canada and Oshkosh in it and then other numerous smaller ones. I had received about 44 hours of dual from my CFII Andy Crabtree (Now building a RV-7) in my RV-10. I had 51 hours of Actual/Simulated IFR at the time of this checkride. Now I am at the 300 hour mark as a pilot and the plane has 212 on the Hobbs. This couldn't get any better than this. Sorry to be so wordy, but as you can tell, I was pumped! Thank You Ray Doerr CDNI Principal Engineer Sprint PCS 16020 West 113th Street Lenexa, KS 66219 Mailstop KSLNXK0101 (913) 859-1414 (Office) (913) 226-0106 (Pcs) (913) 859-1234 (Fax) Ray.R.Doerr(at)sprint.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Stella" <sstella(at)incisaledge.com>
Subject: IFR Training and Checkride in an RV-10
Date: Jan 12, 2007
Ray, Congrats on your check ride. It's nice to see that a low time pilot shouldn't have a problem flying the RV-10. I have about 70 hours right now and should have at least 100 or more by the time I finish the kit (I just started). Enjoy the RV experience (I'm jealous!). Steve #40654 Emp. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Doerr, Ray R [NTK] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 10:41 AM Subject: RV10-List: IFR Training and Checkride in an RV-10 As of Jan 11, 2007, I have successfully pass my IFR checkride with Ron Albertson (Awesome guy by the way). I just wanted to let other builders of the RV-10 know that it is awesome to receive your entire IRF training like I did in your own RV-10. And then be able to find an examiner willing to do the checkride in an experimental airplane. Ron had only one experience in an experimental prior to do the checkride in my RV-10. He flew a Burt Rutan design and told the owner "Thanks" but that he would never fly that again. Since that was his only experience with experimental, I made it my duty to try and change his mind. So after we finished the checkride, some of his comments were, "Awesome IFR Panel", this was mainly because he liked the Dynon EFIS and EMS and the dual Garmin 430's that he had 1,000 of hours flying behind. "Wow", this was when I climbed out at 100 Knots and 1500 Ft/Min with full fuel. "Very Stable IFR Platform", this was when he took the stick for unusual attitudes, better known as "Instructor Fun Time". After the checkride I was confident that I had changed the mind of this one very highly qualified Professional on the point of Experimental Aircraft, specifically the Van's RV-10. The checkride consisted of: File IFR to Topeka, KS Billard (KTOP) for the VOR 22 7 DME ARC. This was a non-precision approach using the autopilot. I was not ready for this because, I had thought he would have wanted this hand flown as I have practiced 10 times before. Anyway the TruTrak DigiFlight II with GPSS worked awesome. It flew us directly to the IAF (KUMGY) on the Arc, then the autopilot flew the Arc while I monitored the distance from the VOR. Then at DMARCY, and Intermediate fix, the autopilot cranked it 90 degrees to the left to fly the 25 degree radial (Heading 205) to the station, then after crossing the VOR, it changed to the 214 degree radial directly to the runway. All I had to do during this time is monitor the approach using the VOR driving the #1 CDI, while my #2 CDI was indicating if I was on the arc/radial via the GPS. Next up was the Missed approach back to the hold, where we did a couple of turns and then back into KTOP for the ILS 13 using Vectors from Kansas City Center. Center was extremely busy at this point and they forgot about me after the last 90 degree intercept they gave me. After blowing through the localizer (communication was none top, otherwise, I would have warned them) by 2 miles, they apologized and asked if I wanted to be vector around again or would take a hard left directly to the FAF. I told the hard left, and I crank it around, intercepted the localizer about 1 mile from the FAF, had to loose 1000 ft and get everything lined up. Examiner was pretty quiet at this time and minute later I had everything lined up and flew the needles in the doughnut the rest of the way down to minimums. Now it was time to go missed and cancel IFR and go out and do maneuvers. We did a couple of unusual attitudes, turns, climbs etc. Last up was the non-precision GPS approach back into my home airport (K34). Ron gave me vectors to final. This approach was flown with no Dynon EFIS, so I had to use my mechanical AIS, ALT, VSI and TruTrak Turn Coorinator. This approached ended by doing a circling to land at minimums. I hard a very smooth landing and Ron commented that I did an A+ job, and that I knew the airplane well. I guess anyone who has built there own airplane can definitely say that! In summary, I was a 100 hour pilot when I started flying my RV-10 (First flight May 26, 2006). I had logged a long cross country to Canada and Oshkosh in it and then other numerous smaller ones. I had received about 44 hours of dual from my CFII Andy Crabtree (Now building a RV-7) in my RV-10. I had 51 hours of Actual/Simulated IFR at the time of this checkride. Now I am at the 300 hour mark as a pilot and the plane has 212 on the Hobbs. This couldn't get any better than this. Sorry to be so wordy, but as you can tell, I was pumped! Thank You Ray Doerr CDNI Principal Engineer Sprint PCS 16020 West 113th Street Lenexa, KS 66219 Mailstop KSLNXK0101 (913) 859-1414 (Office) (913) 226-0106 (Pcs) (913) 859-1234 (Fax) Ray.R.Doerr(at)sprint.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: IFR Training and Checkride in an RV-10
Date: Jan 12, 2007
From: "Doerr, Ray R [NTK]" <Ray.R.Doerr(at)sprint.com>
It is not a hard airplane to fly, it is just fast and everything happen faster, and you need to be ready for that. The big issue with being a low time private pilot (No IFR Ticket) is going to be with getting any insurance or reasonable insurance. This fact makes no sense when you have RV-7's and 8's as fast as the RV-10 and more unstable to fly. But then the hull value on a RV-10 is going to be much higher. I can say I had to have a friend (Tom Deutsch on this list) help me change the minds of the underwriters at AIG to ensure me on my RV-10. Thank You Ray Doerr 40250 (N519RV Flying 212 Hrs) -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Steve Stella Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 10:41 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: IFR Training and Checkride in an RV-10 Ray, Congrats on your check ride. It's nice to see that a low time pilot shouldn't have a problem flying the RV-10. I have about 70 hours right now and should have at least 100 or more by the time I finish the kit (I just started). Enjoy the RV experience (I'm jealous!). Steve #40654 Emp. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Doerr, Ray R [NTK] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 10:41 AM Subject: RV10-List: IFR Training and Checkride in an RV-10 As of Jan 11, 2007, I have successfully pass my IFR checkride with Ron Albertson (Awesome guy by the way). I just wanted to let other builders of the RV-10 know that it is awesome to receive your entire IRF training like I did in your own RV-10. And then be able to find an examiner willing to do the checkride in an experimental airplane. Ron had only one experience in an experimental prior to do the checkride in my RV-10. He flew a Burt Rutan design and told the owner "Thanks" but that he would never fly that again. Since that was his only experience with experimental, I made it my duty to try and change his mind. So after we finished the checkride, some of his comments were, "Awesome IFR Panel", this was mainly because he liked the Dynon EFIS and EMS and the dual Garmin 430's that he had 1,000 of hours flying behind. "Wow", this was when I climbed out at 100 Knots and 1500 Ft/Min with full fuel. "Very Stable IFR Platform", this was when he took the stick for unusual attitudes, better known as "Instructor Fun Time". After the checkride I was confident that I had changed the mind of this one very highly qualified Professional on the point of Experimental Aircraft, specifically the Van's RV-10. The checkride consisted of: File IFR to Topeka, KS Billard (KTOP) for the VOR 22 7 DME ARC. This was a non-precision approach using the autopilot. I was not ready for this because, I had thought he would have wanted this hand flown as I have practiced 10 times before. Anyway the TruTrak DigiFlight II with GPSS worked awesome. It flew us directly to the IAF (KUMGY) on the Arc, then the autopilot flew the Arc while I monitored the distance from the VOR. Then at DMARCY, and Intermediate fix, the autopilot cranked it 90 degrees to the left to fly the 25 degree radial (Heading 205) to the station, then after crossing the VOR, it changed to the 214 degree radial directly to the runway. All I had to do during this time is monitor the approach using the VOR driving the #1 CDI, while my #2 CDI was indicating if I was on the arc/radial via the GPS. Next up was the Missed approach back to the hold, where we did a couple of turns and then back into KTOP for the ILS 13 using Vectors from Kansas City Center. Center was extremely busy at this point and they forgot about me after the last 90 degree intercept they gave me. After blowing through the localizer (communication was none top, otherwise, I would have warned them) by 2 miles, they apologized and asked if I wanted to be vector around again or would take a hard left directly to the FAF. I told the hard left, and I crank it around, intercepted the localizer about 1 mile from the FAF, had to loose 1000 ft and get everything lined up. Examiner was pretty quiet at this time and minute later I had everything lined up and flew the needles in the doughnut the rest of the way down to minimums. Now it was time to go missed and cancel IFR and go out and do maneuvers. We did a couple of unusual attitudes, turns, climbs etc. Last up was the non-precision GPS approach back into my home airport (K34). Ron gave me vectors to final. This approach was flown with no Dynon EFIS, so I had to use my mechanical AIS, ALT, VSI and TruTrak Turn Coorinator. This approached ended by doing a circling to land at minimums. I hard a very smooth landing and Ron commented that I did an A+ job, and that I knew the airplane well. I guess anyone who has built there own airplane can definitely say that! In summary, I was a 100 hour pilot when I started flying my RV-10 (First flight May 26, 2006). I had logged a long cross country to Canada and Oshkosh in it and then other numerous smaller ones. I had received about 44 hours of dual from my CFII Andy Crabtree (Now building a RV-7) in my RV-10. I had 51 hours of Actual/Simulated IFR at the time of this checkride. Now I am at the 300 hour mark as a pilot and the plane has 212 on the Hobbs. This couldn't get any better than this. Sorry to be so wordy, but as you can tell, I was pumped! Thank You Ray Doerr CDNI Principal Engineer Sprint PCS 16020 West 113th Street Lenexa, KS 66219 Mailstop KSLNXK0101 (913) 859-1414 (Office) (913) 226-0106 (Pcs) (913) 859-1234 (Fax) Ray.R.Doerr(at)sprint.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Derburring Rib Flange Slots
From: "arthurww" <arthur(at)cftech.co.uk>
Date: Jan 12, 2007
Ok Mike but they are cheap aren't they? Especially if you live in the UK. [Wink] -------- #40641 EMP Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=87097#87097 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 12, 2007
From: "Mike Lauritsen - Work" <mike(at)cleavelandtool.com>
Subject: Re: Derburring Rib Flange Slots
Sorry, I though we were talking about a 3M product ;-) On 1/12/07, arthurww wrote: > > > Ok Mike but they are cheap aren't they? > Especially if you live in the UK. [Wink] > > -------- > #40641 EMP > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Stella" <sstella(at)incisaledge.com>
Subject: IFR Training and Checkride in an RV-10
Date: Jan 12, 2007
Well it won't be easy to accumulate a lot of hours while I'm building but hopefully I will be able to free up enough time for some flying and some transition training when I get closer to completion. Steve 40654 Emp. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Doerr, Ray R [NTK] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 12:02 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: IFR Training and Checkride in an RV-10 It is not a hard airplane to fly, it is just fast and everything happen faster, and you need to be ready for that. The big issue with being a low time private pilot (No IFR Ticket) is going to be with getting any insurance or reasonable insurance. This fact makes no sense when you have RV-7's and 8's as fast as the RV-10 and more unstable to fly. But then the hull value on a RV-10 is going to be much higher. I can say I had to have a friend (Tom Deutsch on this list) help me change the minds of the underwriters at AIG to ensure me on my RV-10. Thank You Ray Doerr 40250 (N519RV Flying 212 Hrs) -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Steve Stella Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 10:41 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: IFR Training and Checkride in an RV-10 Ray, Congrats on your check ride. It's nice to see that a low time pilot shouldn't have a problem flying the RV-10. I have about 70 hours right now and should have at least 100 or more by the time I finish the kit (I just started). Enjoy the RV experience (I'm jealous!). Steve #40654 Emp. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Doerr, Ray R [NTK] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 10:41 AM Subject: RV10-List: IFR Training and Checkride in an RV-10 As of Jan 11, 2007, I have successfully pass my IFR checkride with Ron Albertson (Awesome guy by the way). I just wanted to let other builders of the RV-10 know that it is awesome to receive your entire IRF training like I did in your own RV-10. And then be able to find an examiner willing to do the checkride in an experimental airplane. Ron had only one experience in an experimental prior to do the checkride in my RV-10. He flew a Burt Rutan design and told the owner "Thanks" but that he would never fly that again. Since that was his only experience with experimental, I made it my duty to try and change his mind. So after we finished the checkride, some of his comments were, "Awesome IFR Panel", this was mainly because he liked the Dynon EFIS and EMS and the dual Garmin 430's that he had 1,000 of hours flying behind. "Wow", this was when I climbed out at 100 Knots and 1500 Ft/Min with full fuel. "Very Stable IFR Platform", this was when he took the stick for unusual attitudes, better known as "Instructor Fun Time". After the checkride I was confident that I had changed the mind of this one very highly qualified Professional on the point of Experimental Aircraft, specifically the Van's RV-10. The checkride consisted of: File IFR to Topeka, KS Billard (KTOP) for the VOR 22 7 DME ARC. This was a non-precision approach using the autopilot. I was not ready for this because, I had thought he would have wanted this hand flown as I have practiced 10 times before. Anyway the TruTrak DigiFlight II with GPSS worked awesome. It flew us directly to the IAF (KUMGY) on the Arc, then the autopilot flew the Arc while I monitored the distance from the VOR. Then at DMARCY, and Intermediate fix, the autopilot cranked it 90 degrees to the left to fly the 25 degree radial (Heading 205) to the station, then after crossing the VOR, it changed to the 214 degree radial directly to the runway. All I had to do during this time is monitor the approach using the VOR driving the #1 CDI, while my #2 CDI was indicating if I was on the arc/radial via the GPS. Next up was the Missed approach back to the hold, where we did a couple of turns and then back into KTOP for the ILS 13 using Vectors from Kansas City Center. Center was extremely busy at this point and they forgot about me after the last 90 degree intercept they gave me. After blowing through the localizer (communication was none top, otherwise, I would have warned them) by 2 miles, they apologized and asked if I wanted to be vector around again or would take a hard left directly to the FAF. I told the hard left, and I crank it around, intercepted the localizer about 1 mile from the FAF, had to loose 1000 ft and get everything lined up. Examiner was pretty quiet at this time and minute later I had everything lined up and flew the needles in the doughnut the rest of the way down to minimums. Now it was time to go missed and cancel IFR and go out and do maneuvers. We did a couple of unusual attitudes, turns, climbs etc. Last up was the non-precision GPS approach back into my home airport (K34). Ron gave me vectors to final. This approach was flown with no Dynon EFIS, so I had to use my mechanical AIS, ALT, VSI and TruTrak Turn Coorinator. This approached ended by doing a circling to land at minimums. I hard a very smooth landing and Ron commented that I did an A+ job, and that I knew the airplane well. I guess anyone who has built there own airplane can definitely say that! In summary, I was a 100 hour pilot when I started flying my RV-10 (First flight May 26, 2006). I had logged a long cross country to Canada and Oshkosh in it and then other numerous smaller ones. I had received about 44 hours of dual from my CFII Andy Crabtree (Now building a RV-7) in my RV-10. I had 51 hours of Actual/Simulated IFR at the time of this checkride. Now I am at the 300 hour mark as a pilot and the plane has 212 on the Hobbs. This couldn't get any better than this. Sorry to be so wordy, but as you can tell, I was pumped! Thank You Ray Doerr CDNI Principal Engineer Sprint PCS 16020 West 113th Street Lenexa, KS 66219 Mailstop KSLNXK0101 (913) 859-1414 (Office) (913) 226-0106 (Pcs) (913) 859-1234 (Fax) Ray.R.Doerr(at)sprint.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Derburring Rib Flange Slots
Date: Jan 12, 2007
From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder(at)sausen.net>
I Used the Cogsdill quite a bit and they were generally ok if you set the tension correctly. They were always a bit fragile though and changing the blade was a female dog. I don't know if the single step version of the ezburr would be useful because you still need to take the pieces apart in order to get both sides but their standard deburr tool looks greatly improved and much beefier than the Cogsdill. Michael Sausen From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mike Lauritsen - Work Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 10:33 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Derburring Rib Flange Slots Checking into it. Stock they start at 3/8". These cutters were designed to use in a milling machine or a very rigid application. I know that builders have had mixed results, some swear by them, some swear at them. I am willing to try it to see if there is a better solution out there. For those that use them, do you still deburr the two sides that are between the parts (inside of the skin, outside of the substructure)? Mike On 1/12/07, Jeff Carpenter wrote: Hi Mike, While you're talking about stocking things... I was on the ezburr (www.ezburr.com ) website the other day and saw that they will custom manufacture bits that drill and deburr in one step. I didn't delve into it enough to determine the costs involved, but it seems to me that it's something that you could pursue and offer to the builders if the economies of scale work out. Jeff Carpenter 40304 I was on the Burr Away On Jan 12, 2007, at 7:08 AM, Mike Lauritsen - Work wrote: If you guys want them, I can supply them. I found that both those and the bristle disks will wear very quickly, thus I didn't think they were a good value. But I am happy to stock anything that is in demand :) If you would like them email me directly. Thanks, Mike -- Mike Lauritsen Cleaveland Aircraft Tool 515-432-6794 www.cleavelandtool.com On 1/11/07, arthurww < arthur(at)cftech.co.uk > wrote: I think I may have found that magic tool... 3M (of course) do a 3mm thick unitized cut & polish wheel. Available in 3 diameters 38, 50 & 75mm. Tried one tonight in a right angle die grinder... seemed to work very well and quite quick. Regards Arthur -------- #40641 EMP Read this topic online here: href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List"> <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List href="http://forums.matronics.com"> http://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List http://forums.matronics.com -- Mike Lauritsen Cleaveland Aircraft Tool 515-432-6794 www.cleavelandtool.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ddddsp1(at)juno.com" <ddddsp1(at)juno.com>
Date: Jan 13, 2007
Subject: Re: IFR Training and Checkride in an RV-10
Ray, Congratulations, What a super accomplishment. First, you built a fanta stic plane and now you can fly it in the clouds! If you ever need IFR practice to KGRI let me know.......free taxi and lunch when you land. L arry L. called a few times this week for questions on the RV 10 but he s aid he calls you for all the Electronics questions! Maybe by the end o f this year we can fly a threesome formation (Larry L., you and me). FLY SAFE! Dean 40449 ________________________________________________________________________ FREE Reminder Service - NEW from AmericanGreetings.com Click HERE and never forget a Birthday or Anniversary again! http://track.juno.com/s/lc?s=197335&u=http://www.americangreetings.c om/products/online_calendar.pd?c=uol5752

Ray,

Congratulations,  What a super accomplishment.  First, you built a fantastic plane and now you can fly it in the clouds!   ; If you ever need IFR practice to KGRI let me know.......free taxi and lunch when you land.  Larry L. called a few times this week for que stions on the RV 10 but he said he calls you for all the Electronics que stions!   Maybe by the end of this year we can fly a threesome formation (Larry L., you and me). 

FLY SAFE!

Dean 40449



______________________ __________________________________________________
FREE Remin der Service - NEW from AmericanGreetings.com
Click HERE and never forget a Birthday or Anniversary again!
< br>

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net>
Subject: Panel install
Date: Jan 13, 2007
My first send of this message got kicked back to me saying that it was to large with the attachments I had so I've cut it down, I hope, to size. If any of you would like to see any of the other install pictures just e-mail me and I will forward them to you. Lets try this again :>} ----- Original Message ----- From: Wayne Edgerton Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 7:07 AM Subject: Panel install We are in the process of installing my instrument panel and I thought I would share a couple of photos with you. Stein's group built my panel and even though it has been a while in the making, it was well worth the wait for me. I think it turned out great. I'm certainly glad I didn't have to rely on my skill set to install this puppy or I would be in the deep you know what. I'm pretty much a neophyte when it comes to electrical stuff. For me it's seems at times I can get frustrated with the process and the delays one runs into in this journey we are all taking but when you see it coming together like this it all pops back into focus that this thing maybe is really going to fly someday :>} Stein was telling me that he just wrote an article for Kit Plane Magazine about panel building and installation and he said they will use some of the photos from my instrument install in that article. If some of you are like me and only receive the daily Matronics summary, which usually doesn't include photo attachments, and you would like to see the photos I'm sending, just e-mail me and I will forward them on to you. Wayne Edgerton #40336 getting the itch to fly this puppy ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Michael Schipper <mike(at)learningplanet.com>
Subject: Re: Little helper
Date: Jan 13, 2007
________________________________________________________________________________
From: cloudvalley(at)comcast.net
Subject: Empennage
Date: Jan 13, 2007
Hello, My wife and I have finished the empennage! Now we have a wait to get to the rest of the kit, in order to get other things ready to facilitate the building process, like a well-equipped shop! Exciting and frustrating already, and we are fairly new in the group. We were told the tail section is the most difficult if you are getting the quickbuild. Does anyone agree with that? Brian and Ruth Preston #40666
Hello,
 My wife and I have finished the empennage! Now we have a wait to get to the rest of the kit, in order to get other things ready to facilitate the building process, like a well-equipped shop! Exciting and frustrating already, and we are fairly new in the group. We were told the tail section is the most difficult if you are getting the quickbuild. Does anyone agree with that?
 
Brian and Ruth Preston
#40666

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Albert Gardner" <ibspud(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Image Resizer Utility
Date: Jan 13, 2007
Microsoft has a Powertoy utility called ImageResizer which is available here http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/downloads/powertoys/xppowertoys.mspx and will resize picture file by about 90%. The file name is ImageResizerPowertoySetup.exe and it is very useful not only for making picture files smaller (i.e., a 698KB jpg was resized to 56KB) to send to the list but also requires far less disk space for all those pictures we take of out projects. It works well, is very fast, and the pictures look very good after being compressed. All you do is select the picture file or files, right click, select resize and in a few seconds you have a copy of the file reduced in file while the original is not altered. Albert Gardner Yuma, AZ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 13, 2007
From: James Hein <n8vim(at)arrl.net>
Subject: Re: Image Resizer Utility
Microsoft.. Ick! Actually, I use Linux most of the time (even at work - we find it much more reliable for our medical devices that are used in the O.R. - Would you want a blue screen to happen there? ). There's a nice little tool to do the same thing, but gives you much more control over the process. for those so interested: (Those who want to try Linux without installing anything, there's a complete CD that you can boot to and it will give you a full system without touching your hard drive. http://www.knopper.net/knoppix/index-en.html) <http://www.knopper.net/knoppix/index-en.html> mogrify(1) mogrify(1) NAME mogrify - resize an image, blur, crop, despeckle, dither, draw on, flip, join, re-sample, and much more. Mogrify overwrites the original image file, whereas, convert(1) writes to a different image file. SYNOPSIS mogrify [options] input-file OVERVIEW The mogrify program is a member of the ImageMagick(1) suite of tools. Use it to resize an image, blur, crop, despeckle, dither, draw on, flip, join, re-sample, and much more. This tool is similiar to con- vert(1) except the original image file is overwritten with any changes you request. For more information about the mogrify command, point your browser to file:///usr/share/doc/ImageMagick-6.2.5/www/morify.html or http://www.imagemagick.org/script/mogrify.php. Run to get a summary of the mogrify command options. SEE-ALSO ImageMagick(1) COPYRIGHT Copyright (C) 1999-2005 ImageMagick Studio LLC. Additional copyrights and licenses apply to this software, see http://www.imagemag- ick.org/script/license.php ImageMagick Date: 2005/03/01 01:00:00 mogrify(1) -Jim 40384 Albert Gardner wrote: >Microsoft has a Powertoy utility called ImageResizer which is available here >http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/downloads/powertoys/xppowertoys.mspx and >will resize picture file by about 90%. The file name is >ImageResizerPowertoySetup.exe and it is very useful not only for making >picture files smaller (i.e., a 698KB jpg was resized to 56KB) to send to the >list but also requires far less disk space for all those pictures we take of >out projects. It works well, is very fast, and the pictures look very good >after being compressed. All you do is select the picture file or files, >right click, select resize and in a few seconds you have a copy of the file >reduced in file while the original is not altered. >Albert Gardner >Yuma, AZ > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 13, 2007
From: MauleDriver <MauleDriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Image Resizer Utility
Another option that I use is IRFAN. A very good piece of freeware for photoediting and handling tasks. Seems to have very compact code with lot's of function and little overhead. My default photo viewer. Just Google it if you want to take a look. Albert Gardner wrote: > Microsoft has a Powertoy utility called ImageResizer which is available here > http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/downloads/powertoys/xppowertoys.mspx and > will resize picture file by about 90%. The file name is > ImageResizerPowertoySetup.exe and it is very useful not only for making > picture files smaller (i.e., a 698KB jpg was resized to 56KB) to send to the > list but also requires far less disk space for all those pictures we take of > out projects. It works well, is very fast, and the pictures look very good > after being compressed. All you do is select the picture file or files, > right click, select resize and in a few seconds you have a copy of the file > reduced in file while the original is not altered. > Albert Gardner > Yuma, AZ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 13, 2007
From: linn Walters <pitts_pilot(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Image Resizer Utility .... slightly off-topic
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "ddddsp1(at)juno.com" <ddddsp1(at)juno.com>
Date: Jan 13, 2007
Subject: Empennage
I was told that there is a quickbuild fiberglass kit available. Trying to remember where I saw one........................oh yea.............. ..John Nye had some. Dean 40449 ________________________________________________________________________ FREE Reminder Service - NEW from AmericanGreetings.com Click HERE and never forget a Birthday or Anniversary again! http://track.juno.com/s/lc?s=197335&u=http://www.americangreetings.c om/products/online_calendar.pd?c=uol5752

I was told that there is a quickbuild fiberglass kit available.    Trying to remember where I saw one........................o h yea................John Nye had some.

 

 

Dean 40449



______________________ __________________________________________________
FREE Remin der Service - NEW from AmericanGreetings.com
Click HERE and never forget a Birthday or Anniversary again!
< br>

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Ritter" <mritter509(at)msn.com>
Subject: N410MR
Date: Jan 13, 2007
N410MR leaving Texas Aerocolor paint shop in Brady, Texas Mark _________________________________________________________________ The MSN Entertainment Guide to Golden Globes is here. Get all the scoop. http://tv.msn.com/tv/globes2007/?icid=nctagline2 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Ritter" <mritter509(at)msn.com>
Subject: N410MR leaving paint shop
Date: Jan 13, 2007
Hope I downsized the picture this time. Mark _________________________________________________________________ Communicate instantly! Use your Hotmail address to sign into Windows Live Messenger now. http://get.live.com/messenger/overview ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chris Hukill" <cjhukill(at)cox.net>
Subject: Computer Wars
Date: Jan 14, 2007
At the risk of starting a whole new war, let me say that I use Macs for all of my audio, video, photography needs. Just try it and you'll see why. My PCs are used only for business software compatibility issues, but I still run Windows 98 so I can maintain SCSI support for some of my old, pre USB / Firewire gear, and more importantly, because most of the a**holes that write bugs don't bother with '98 anymore. Chris Hukill still in home remodel hiatus back to gear fairings,soon ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne Edgerton" <wayne.e(at)grandecom.net>
Subject: Re: Empennage
Date: Jan 14, 2007
Brian and Ruth, If you disregard the canopy and the doors, I might agree with that. But I think the empennage was the hardest for me because I was, and probably still am, a novice so I was learning a lot of new skills that I hadn't ever had. Once I was finished with the empennage I had a lot more confidence and experience. Wayne Edgerton #40336 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 14, 2007
From: "W. Curtis" <wcurtis(at)core.com>
Subject: RE: Empennage
>They do, and it is $85k, goto the website for the Vans QB builders and >they have it listed for purchase. Do not know how you would get it >certified here though. >Dan > Dan, "They" who and to which website are your referring? I see no mention of this $85K on Van's (?) website. William Curtis -SB about to fit lid http://nerv10.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: N410MR
Date: Jan 14, 2007
From: "Scott Schmidt" <sschmidt(at)ussynthetic.com>
That paint looks great Mark! Great job with the design too. Scott Schmidt sschmidt(at)ussynthetic.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mark Ritter Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 7:42 PM Subject: RV10-List: N410MR N410MR leaving Texas Aerocolor paint shop in Brady, Texas Mark _________________________________________________________________ The MSN Entertainment Guide to Golden Globes is here. Get all the scoop. http://tv.msn.com/tv/globes2007/?icid=nctagline2 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 15, 2007
From: Niko <owl40188(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Cabin Cover Aft Flange Fit
I have been fitting the Cabin Cover on this past weekend. The fit of the C abin Cover aft flange to the tailcone skin is good at the top of the cabin cover however it opens up a bit (1/8) as one gets to the bottom of the Cabi n cover aft flange. There is still enough edge distance for the fasteners left (about 1/4 in).=0A=0AI am wondering if thats typicall of what others h ave seen. =0A=0AThanks=0A=0ANiko=0A40188 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: RE: Empennage
Date: Jan 15, 2007
From: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR(at)wernerco.com>
That is because it is not offered through Vans. The level of completion they build it to would not meet the US requirements for 51%, so I only provide this link for informational purposes and you can do with it what you want to.... http://www.bonanzametalcrafters.com/index.htm contact them for a price list and options available. Dan N289DT _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of W. Curtis Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 11:37 PM Subject: RV10-List: RE: Empennage >They do, and it is $85k, goto the website for the Vans QB builders and >they have it listed for purchase. Do not know how you would get it >certified here though. >Dan > Dan, "They" who and to which website are your referring? I see no mention of this $85K on Van's (?) website. William Curtis -SB about to fit lid http://nerv10.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: RE: Empennage
Date: Jan 15, 2007
From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com>
My question remains unanswered. How many builders would be interested and how much might they pay for an improved canopy with door fitment complete which meets the current FAA 51% rule? Carbon fiber, lighter weight, roll bars included, overhead air plenum, improved hinges, improved locks with fitment and alignment up to 21 century QC standards. This would like remain predicated on VANS continuing to do the right thing by crediting builders who find the composite components not up to the Builder's QC standard. We are the builders. I understand that $700 is the customary rebate for those going with a Wholly Cowl. John Cox #40600 ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Lloyd, Daniel R. Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 7:10 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: RE: Empennage That is because it is not offered through Vans. The level of completion they build it to would not meet the US requirements for 51%, so I only provide this link for informational purposes and you can do with it what you want to.... http://www.bonanzametalcrafters.com/index.htm contact them for a price list and options available. Dan N289DT ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of W. Curtis Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 11:37 PM Subject: RV10-List: RE: Empennage >They do, and it is $85k, goto the website for the Vans QB builders and >they have it listed for purchase. Do not know how you would get it >certified here though. >Dan > Dan, "They" who and to which website are your referring? I see no mention of this $85K on Van's (?) website. William Curtis -SB about to fit lid http://nerv10.com/ href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronic s .com/Navigator?RV10-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: RE: Empennage
Date: Jan 15, 2007
From: "Phillips, Jack" <Jack.Phillips(at)cardinal.com>
I would be interested, depending on cost. I also intend to buy a Wholly Cowl for my RV-10. Jack Phillips #40610 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John W. Cox Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 10:38 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: RE: Empennage My question remains unanswered. How many builders would be interested and how much might they pay for an improved canopy with door fitment complete which meets the current FAA 51% rule? Carbon fiber, lighter weight, roll bars included, overhead air plenum, improved hinges, improved locks with fitment and alignment up to 21 century QC standards. This would like remain predicated on VANS continuing to do the right thing by crediting builders who find the composite components not up to the Builder's QC standard. We are the builders. I understand that $700 is the customary rebate for those going with a Wholly Cowl. John Cox #40600 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Lloyd, Daniel R=2E Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 7:10 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: RE: Empennage That is because it is not offered through Vans. The level of completion they build it to would not meet the US requirements for 51%, so I only provide this link for informational purposes and you can do with it what you want to.... http://www.bonanzametalcrafters.com/index.htm contact them for a price list and options available. Dan N289DT _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of W. Curtis Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 11:37 PM Subject: RV10-List: RE: Empennage >They do, and it is $85k, goto the website for the Vans QB builders and >they have it listed for purchase. Do not know how you would get it >certified here though. >Dan > Dan, "They" who and to which website are your referring? I see no mention of this $85K on Van's (?) website. William Curtis -SB about to fit lid http://nerv10.com/ href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics .com/Navigator?RV10-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List> http://forums.matronics.com _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilege d, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it i n error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N ________________________________________________________________________________
From: John Ackerman <johnag5b(at)cableone.net>
Subject: Soldering
Date: Jan 15, 2007
Here's a compilation of links on how to (or not to) solder. I only looked at a couple - sorta juvenile, but could be useful. http://arstechnica.com/journals/thumbs.ars/2007/1/14/6613 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Gonzalez" <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com>
Subject: RE: Empennage
Date: Jan 15, 2007
I see a new war on the horizon. I would imagine that they could build an almost completed shell, ship it to you in a container and one would have to unrivet a lot of the work inorder to get the wiring and systems inplace. The pictures just go to show how big a business this really is. I personally am happy for the 51% rule and I am happy I am taking advantage of it. Whining because I only put in about 11 hours last weekend. Is anyone running anything under the pilot and co pilot floors before I close them up?????? John G. 409 need some fuel for the brain-motivation, chemical, spiritual or emotional. EEEHHHHH! MAybe need a break, maybe a trip to Hawaii would be good. >From: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR(at)wernerco.com> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: RE: RV10-List: RE: Empennage >Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:10:00 -0500 > >That is because it is not offered through Vans. The level of completion >they build it to would not meet the US requirements for 51%, so I only >provide this link for informational purposes and you can do with it what >you want to.... >http://www.bonanzametalcrafters.com/index.htm contact them for a price >list and options available. >Dan >N289DT > > _____ > >From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of W. Curtis >Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 11:37 PM >To: RV10-List(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV10-List: RE: Empennage > > > >They do, and it is $85k, goto the website for the Vans QB builders and > >they have it listed for purchase. Do not know how you would get it > >certified here though. > >Dan > > >Dan, > >"They" who and to which website are your referring? I see no mention of >this $85K on Van's (?) website. >William Curtis -SB about to fit lid >http://nerv10.com/ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 15, 2007
From: "Fred Williams, M.D." <drfred(at)suddenlinkmail.com>
Subject: Canopy
I'd be interested in a different canopy if it had a better fit/mods. Why not? Time is time and it sounds like a lot of time is spent on finishing the canopy and the doors. I do enjoy the building process but I do want to fly when I run out of parts. Fred Williams 40515 Wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Gonzalez" <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com>
Subject: RE: Empennage
Date: Jan 15, 2007
Haven't started on this section, but if things are as bad as people say, I would be interested in a better part. Price is an issue, but if the new part is that much improved and does as it claims, the value is realized and worth it. The vertical stab faring was almost a quarter of an inch short in its intersection with the rudder, that was unexceptable for me and I spend atleast two or more hours increasing its length. John G. >From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: RE: RV10-List: RE: Empennage >Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:38:18 -0800 > >My question remains unanswered. How many builders would be interested >and how much might they pay for an improved canopy with door fitment >complete which meets the current FAA 51% rule? Carbon fiber, lighter >weight, roll bars included, overhead air plenum, improved hinges, >improved locks with fitment and alignment up to 21 century QC standards. > > >This would like remain predicated on VANS continuing to do the right >thing by crediting builders who find the composite components not up to >the Builder's QC standard. We are the builders. I understand that $700 >is the customary rebate for those going with a Wholly Cowl. > > >John Cox >#40600 > >________________________________ > >From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Lloyd, Daniel >R. >Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 7:10 AM >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RE: RV10-List: RE: Empennage > > >That is because it is not offered through Vans. The level of completion >they build it to would not meet the US requirements for 51%, so I only >provide this link for informational purposes and you can do with it what >you want to.... > >http://www.bonanzametalcrafters.com/index.htm contact them for a price >list and options available. > >Dan > >N289DT > > >________________________________ > >From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of W. Curtis >Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 11:37 PM >To: RV10-List(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV10-List: RE: Empennage > > >They do, and it is $85k, goto the website for the Vans QB builders and > >they have it listed for purchase. Do not know how you would get it > >certified here though. > >Dan > > >Dan, > >"They" who and to which website are your referring? I see no mention of >this $85K on Van's (?) website. >William Curtis -SB about to fit lid >http://nerv10.com/ > > >href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics >.com/Navigator?RV10-List >href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: RE: Empennage - James Cowl
Date: Jan 15, 2007
From: "Chris Johnston" <CJohnston(at)popsound.com>
Just thought I'd chime in here - I just sent my check off for my Sam James RV-10 Cowl, and I do have my standard cowl here as well, so when the new cowl comes I'll give a pirep and snap some pics illustrating the differences in quality and shape. I got the RV-10 cowl for the standard, not the cold air induction. We'll see. cj #40410 fuse www.perfectlygoodairplane.net -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Phillips, Jack Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 7:53 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: RE: Empennage I would be interested, depending on cost. I also intend to buy a Wholly Cowl for my RV-10. Jack Phillips #40610 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John W. Cox Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 10:38 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: RE: Empennage My question remains unanswered. How many builders would be interested and how much might they pay for an improved canopy with door fitment complete which meets the current FAA 51% rule? Carbon fiber, lighter weight, roll bars included, overhead air plenum, improved hinges, improved locks with fitment and alignment up to 21 century QC standards. This would like remain predicated on VANS continuing to do the right thing by crediting builders who find the composite components not up to the Builder's QC standard. We are the builders. I understand that $700 is the customary rebate for those going with a Wholly Cowl. John Cox #40600 ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Lloyd, Daniel R. Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 7:10 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: RE: Empennage That is because it is not offered through Vans. The level of completion they build it to would not meet the US requirements for 51%, so I only provide this link for informational purposes and you can do with it what you want to.... http://www.bonanzametalcrafters.com/index.htm contact them for a price list and options available. Dan N289DT ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of W. Curtis Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 11:37 PM Subject: RV10-List: RE: Empennage >They do, and it is $85k, goto the website for the Vans QB builders and >they have it listed for purchase. Do not know how you would get it >certified here though. >Dan > Dan, "They" who and to which website are your referring? I see no mention of this $85K on Van's (?) website. William Curtis -SB about to fit lid http://nerv10.com/ href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronic s .com/Navigator?RV10-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List> http://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List> http://forums.matronics.com _________________________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete Dansk - Deutsch - Espanol - Francais - Italiano - Japanese - Nederlands - N ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 15, 2007
From: Niko <owl40188(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: RE: Empennage
Hi John,=0A=0A I haven't thought about this much, however, for a considerab ly lighter graphite canopy thats "almost ready to rivet in place" with an o verhead similar to what Accuracy Avionics provides here is where how much I would be willing to part with.=0A=0A- at 1K to 2K above Vans rebate it wou ld be a great deal and a no brainer for me.=0A- at 3K to 4K above Vans reba te I would have to think about it. Depends on how much lighter, and how go od the fit is.=0A- at 5K above Vans rebate it would a bit expensive to just ify.=0A=0ANiko=0A40188=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: John W. Cox =0ATo: rv10-list(at)matronics.com=0ASent: Monday, January 15, 2007 10:38:18 AM=0ASubject: RE: RV10-List: RE: Empennage=0A=0A =0AMy question remains unanswered. How many builders would be interested a nd how much might they pay for an improved canopy with door fitment complet e which meets the current FAA 51% rule? Carbon fiber, lighter weight, roll bars included, overhead air plenum, improved hinges, improved locks with f itment and alignment up to 21 century QC standards.=0A =0AThis would like r emain predicated on VANS continuing to do the right thing by crediting buil ders who find the composite components not up to the Builder=92s QC standar d. We are the builders. I understand that $700 is the customary rebate fo r those going with a Wholly Cowl.=0A =0AJohn Cox =0A#40600 =0A=0A=0A=0AFrom : owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matro nics.com] On Behalf Of Lloyd, Daniel R.=0ASent: Monday, January 15, 2007 7: 10 AM=0ATo: rv10-list(at)matronics.com=0ASubject: RE: RV10-List: RE: Empennage =0A =0AThat is because it is not offered through Vans. The level of complet ion they build it to would not meet the US requirements for 51%, so I only provide this link for informational purposes and you can do with it what yo u want to....=0Ahttp://www.bonanzametalcrafters.com/index.htm contact them for a price list and options available.=0ADan=0AN289DT=0A =0A=0A=0A=0AFrom: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matron ics.com] On Behalf Of W. Curtis=0ASent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 11:37 PM =0ATo: RV10-List(at)matronics.com=0ASubject: RV10-List: RE: Empennage=0A>They do, and it is $85k, goto the website for the Vans QB builders and=0A>they h ave it listed for purchase. Do not know how you would get it=0A>certified h ere though.=0A>Dan =0A>=0ADan,=0A=0A"They" who and to which website are you r referring? I see no mention of this $85K on Van's (?) website.=0AWilliam Curtis -SB about to fit lid=0Ahttp://nerv10.com/ =0A =0A =0Ahref="http:// www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?R V10-List=0Ahref="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com =0A =0A =0A =0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0Ahttp://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Li ================ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Ritter" <mritter509(at)msn.com>
Subject: RE: Empennage
Date: Jan 15, 2007
I just put some sound proofing material down before closing them up. Mark >From: "John Gonzalez" <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com> >Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RE: RV10-List: RE: Empennage >Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 08:11:33 -0800 > > >I see a new war on the horizon. > >I would imagine that they could build an almost completed shell, ship it to >you in a container and one would have to unrivet a lot of the work inorder >to get the wiring and systems inplace. > >The pictures just go to show how big a business this really is. I >personally am happy for the 51% rule and I am happy I am taking advantage >of it. > >Whining because I only put in about 11 hours last weekend. > >Is anyone running anything under the pilot and co pilot floors before I >close them up?????? > >John G. 409 > > >need some fuel for the brain-motivation, chemical, spiritual or emotional. >EEEHHHHH! >MAybe need a break, maybe a trip to Hawaii would be good. > > >>From: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR(at)wernerco.com> >>Reply-To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >>To: >>Subject: RE: RV10-List: RE: Empennage >>Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:10:00 -0500


January 02, 2007 - January 15, 2007

RV10-Archive.digest.vol-bx