RV10-Archive.digest.vol-ig

June 22, 2011 - July 11, 2011



      I complained some more, and they said, "Okay, but we'll charge shipping and handling
      on the other parts."  I said fine.
      
      They charged me $8 S&H for the other parts. These were so small and light that
      they had been stuffed into the battery box- it really didn't cost them anything
      more to ship them. Not a lot of money, just the principle.
      
      Bob
      
      --------
      Bob Turner
      RV-10 QB
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=343715#343715
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Aircraft Spruce Shipping - Always Beware
From: pilotdds <pilotdds(at)aol.com>
Date: Jun 22, 2011
Tim makes a good point to ask about shipping costs.It costs a lot to ship t he stuff we use-ask about crating and shipping a canopy frame from Oregon t o California-more than the cost of the frame,same with a canopy from Todds in Florida .I for one have found aircraft spruce invaluable with my various projects there huge inventory of parts shipped efficiently for the most pa rt and there catalog is an excellent reference and they have virtually ever ything .Nothing in my world is perfect but ACS has been a real asset for me .Also ACS has no minimum order and will ship us mail.Very efficient when yo u need two dollars worth of nuts and bolts. -----Original Message----- From: Bob Turner <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu> Sent: Tue, Jun 21, 2011 8:31 pm Subject: RV10-List: Re: Aircraft Spruce Shipping - Always Beware A few years ago I ordered an aircraft battery, plus about 8 oz of small par ts, rom ACS. The ACS catalog said "Free shipping on batteries". When I got it, there was a $25 shipping charge. When I complained, they sai d You didn't SPECIFY that you wanted free shipping". Duh. I complained some more, and they said, "Okay, but we'll charge shipping and andling on the other parts." I said fine. They charged me $8 S&H for the other parts. These were so small and light t hat hey had been stuffed into the battery box- it really didn't cost them anyth ing ore to ship them. Not a lot of money, just the principle. Bob -------- ob Turner V-10 QB ead this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=343715#343715 -= - The RV10-List Email Forum - -= Use the Matronics List Features Navigator to browse -= the many List utilities such as List Un/Subscription, -= Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, -= Photoshare, and much much more: - -= --> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List - -======================== -= - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - -= Same great content also available via the Web Forums! - -= --> http://forums.matronics.com - -======================== -= - List Contribution Web Site - -= Thank you for your generous support! -= -Matt Dralle, List Admin. -= --> http://www.matronics.com/contribution -======================== ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: AFS Engine Monitor - % Power info
From: "orchidman" <gary(at)wingscc.com>
Date: Jun 22, 2011
Byron, Have you input the settings from the manual? If you don't have the problem expressed by recapen, then if you have an IO-540 the settings are in the manual. -------- Gary Blankenbiller RV10 - # 40674 (N2GB Flying) Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=343743#343743 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: AFS Engine Monitor - % Power info
From: "Byron" <bgill1(at)charter.net>
Date: Jun 22, 2011
Got it. Just downloaded updated manual and now the tables are included. Thanks for the reply, Byron ------Original Message------ From: orchidman Sender: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com ReplyTo: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RV10-List: Re: AFS Engine Monitor - % Power info Sent: Jun 22, 2011 7:29 AM Byron, Have you input the settings from the manual? If you don't have the problem expressed by recapen, then if you have an IO-540 the settings are in the manual. -------- Gary Blankenbiller RV10 - # 40674 (N2GB Flying) Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=343743#343743 Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Install time for safety trim
From: Robert Brunkenhoefer <robertbrunk(at)me.com>
Date: Jun 22, 2011
I am having safety trim installed and my avionics man never did this one before. How long should it take. I have victory grips and a toggle switch to control the copilot activation. Robert N661G 300Hrs. Robert Brunkenhoefer Sent from my Apple iPad ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Install time for safety trim
From: "Byron" <bgill1(at)charter.net>
Date: Jun 22, 2011
I did mine in around 2 hours including mounting board and switch- but I was replacing another trim relay board so all the wires were there and I had excellent wire schematics from the panel builder (Stein). As Tim mentioned there are lots of variations in design and build. Running new wires etc would lengthen the operation significantly. Byron N253RV - Phase One ------Original Message------ From: Robert Brunkenhoefer Sender: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com ReplyTo: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RV10-List: Install time for safety trim Sent: Jun 22, 2011 8:56 AM I am having safety trim installed and my avionics man never did this one before. How long should it take. I have victory grips and a toggle switch to control the copilot activation. Robert N661G 300Hrs. Robert Brunkenhoefer Sent from my Apple iPad Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Albert Gardner" <ibspud(at)roadrunner.com>
Subject: East of Mississippi
Date: Jun 22, 2011
After leaving OSH the wife and I plan on flying all the states east of the Mississippi river to complete the lower 48. Will be stopping over in NYC for 5 or 6 days and then flying south. I'd like to fly the Hudson River Corridor so I thought that leaving the plane for those days at Westchester County (HPN) or Teterboro (TEB). Has anyone landed at either of those two or flown the corridor? Looks like fun. Took the FAA on-line driving course for NY and Washington SFRA and have placard with "Don't Shoot" in large letters to hold up to the window. Tim's excursions have motivated me to head off into what we in the Mountain States called "Babylon". Albert Gardner N991RV Yuma, AZ (not a mountain state) ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Install time for safety trim
From: Robert Brunkenhoefer <robertbrunk(at)mac.com>
Date: Jun 22, 2011
Thank you for the input. Robert On Jun 22, 2011, at 11:54 AM, Byron wrote: > > I did mine in around 2 hours including mounting board and switch- but I was replacing another trim relay board so all the wires were there and I had excellent wire schematics from the panel builder (Stein). As Tim mentioned there are lots of variations in design and build. Running new wires etc would lengthen the operation significantly. > > Byron > N253RV - Phase One > ------Original Message------ > From: Robert Brunkenhoefer > Sender: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > ReplyTo: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Install time for safety trim > Sent: Jun 22, 2011 8:56 AM > > > I am having safety trim installed and my avionics man never did this one before. How long should it take. I have victory grips and a toggle switch to control the copilot activation. Robert N661G 300Hrs. > > Robert Brunkenhoefer > Sent from my Apple iPad > > > > > > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 22, 2011
Subject: Re: East of Mississippi
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
CDW will be cheaper for overnight fees, although there is a landing fee which the town will bill you a month or two down the road. If you like smaller airports, Lincoln Park is also close by...don't know about their fees, but parking space is relatively limited, so call ahead. NYC terminal chart is essential. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Albert Gardner wro te: > *After leaving OSH the wife and I plan on flying all the states east of t he Mississippi river to complete the lower 48. Will be stopping over in NYC for 5 or 6 days and then flying south. I=92d like to fly the Hudson River Corridor so I thought that leaving the plane for those days at Westchester County (HPN) or Teterboro (TEB). Has anyone landed at either of those two o r flown the corridor? Looks like fun. Took the FAA on-line driving course f or NY and Washington SFRA and have placard with =93Don=92t Shoot=94 in larg e letters to hold up to the window. Tim=92s excursions have motivated me to head off into what we in the Mountain States called =93Babylon=94.* > > *Albert Gardner* > > *N991RV* > > *Yuma, AZ (not a mountain state)* > > * * > > * * > > * > =========== =========== =========== =========== > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "carl.froehlich(at)verizon.net" <carl.froehlich(at)verizon.net>
Date: Jun 22, 2011
Subject: Re: East of Mississippi
SSBsYW5kZWQgYXQgSFBOIG9uIGEgdHJpcCB0byBTdGFtZm9yZCwgQ1QuICBSZWFzb25hYmxlIHBs YWNlIGFuZCBnb29kIHNlcnZpY2UuICBJIGZsZXcgdGhlIEh1ZHNvbiBDb3JyaWRvciBvbiB0aGUg d2F5IGhvbWUsIG5vcnRoIHRvIHNvdXRoLCBhbmQgcmVjb21tZW5kIHRoYXQgcGF0aC4KCkZvbGxv dyB0aGUgcHJvY2VkdXJlcyBmb3IgcmVwb3J0cywgc3BlZWQgYW5kIGFsdGl0dWRlIGFuZCBlbmpv eSB0aGUgdHJpcC4gIFJlY29tbWVuZCBzdGF5aW5nIGNsZWFyIG9mIHRoZSBTdGF0dWUgb2YgTGli ZXJ0eSBhcyB0aGUgdG91ciBoZWxpY29wdGVycyB0ZW5kIHRvIGNvbmdyZWdhdGUgdGhlcmUuICBI YXZlIHlvdXIgcGFzc2VuZ2VyIGRvIHRoZSBwaG90b3Mgc28gdGhhdCB5b3Ugd2F0Y2ggZm9yIHRy YWZmaWMuCgpDYXJsCgpTZW50IGZyb20gbXkgcGhvbmUuwqAgUGxlYXNlIHJlYWQgcGFzdCB0aGUg dHlwb3MuCgotLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIG1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQpGcm9tOiBBbGJlcnQgR2FyZG5lciA8 aWJzcHVkQHJvYWRydW5uZXIuY29tPgpUbzogcnYxMC1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20KU2VudDog V2VkLCBKdW4gMjIsIDIwMTEgMTg6MTE6MzUgR01UKzAwOjAwClN1YmplY3Q6IFJWMTAtTGlzdDog RWFzdCBvZiBNaXNzaXNzaXBwaQoKQWZ0ZXIgbGVhdmluZyBPU0ggdGhlIHdpZmUgYW5kIEkgcGxh biBvbiBmbHlpbmcgYWxsIHRoZSBzdGF0ZXMgZWFzdCBvZiB0aGUKTWlzc2lzc2lwcGkgcml2ZXIg dG8gY29tcGxldGUgdGhlIGxvd2VyIDQ4LiBXaWxsIGJlIHN0b3BwaW5nIG92ZXIgaW4gTllDIGZv cgo1IG9yIDYgZGF5cyBhbmQgdGhlbiBmbHlpbmcgc291dGguIEknZCBsaWtlIHRvIGZseSB0aGUg SHVkc29uIFJpdmVyIENvcnJpZG9yCnNvIEkgdGhvdWdodCB0aGF0IGxlYXZpbmcgdGhlIHBsYW5l IGZvciB0aG9zZSBkYXlzIGF0IFdlc3RjaGVzdGVyIENvdW50eQooSFBOKSBvciBUZXRlcmJvcm8g KFRFQikuIEhhcyBhbnlvbmUgbGFuZGVkIGF0IGVpdGhlciBvZiB0aG9zZSB0d28gb3IgZmxvd24K dGhlIGNvcnJpZG9yPyBMb29rcyBsaWtlIGZ1bi4gVG9vayB0aGUgRkFBIG9uLWxpbmUgZHJpdmlu ZyBjb3Vyc2UgZm9yIE5ZIGFuZApXYXNoaW5ndG9uIFNGUkEgYW5kIGhhdmUgcGxhY2FyZCB3aXRo ICJEb24ndCBTaG9vdCIgaW4gbGFyZ2UgbGV0dGVycyB0byBob2xkCnVwIHRvIHRoZSB3aW5kb3cu IFRpbSdzIGV4Y3Vyc2lvbnMgaGF2ZSBtb3RpdmF0ZWQgbWUgdG8gaGVhZCBvZmYgaW50byB3aGF0 CndlIGluIHRoZSBNb3VudGFpbiBTdGF0ZXMgY2FsbGVkICJCYWJ5bG9uIi4KQWxiZXJ0IEdhcmRu ZXIKTjk5MVJWCll1bWEsIEFaIChub3QgYSBtb3VudGFpbiBzdGF0ZSkKIAogCgo ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fairing Construction - How to?
From: "nukeflyboy" <flymoore(at)charter.net>
Date: Jun 22, 2011
Just a minor point: Tim, you say "the theory is, the air coming in will hit the gear leg especially at higher angles of attack, and flow into that hole, adding pressure to the lower cowl, decreasing the differential between the upper and lower cowl". It doesn't work that way. You have to decrease the pressure at the outlet, increasing the differential pressure. It is differential pressure that drives the flow. Think of it this way - if the pressure was the same top and bottom there would be no driving force, no flow. So whatever it is that you are constructing, it needs to increase the delta P if you want more cooling flow. -------- Dave Moore RV-6 flying RV-10 QB - Need to start panel Rest almost done Breathing too much fiberglass dust Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=343813#343813 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rene Felker" <rene(at)felker.com>
Subject: Re: Fairing Construction - How to?
Date: Jun 22, 2011
Dave I think you miss read what Tim said. The problem is that the hole is there now, with no fairing, and thus there might be an increase in pressure in the lower cowl at higher angles of attack. It is my understanding that he is trying to build a fairing that will redirect the airflow and thus decrease the pressure in the lower cowl. I tried the same thing by putting a deflector on the back of the lower cowl. I saw no improvement so I took it off. I can't wait to see if Tim has any success with putting a fairing on the opening. During hot summer climbs I need all the cooling I can get. Rene' Felker N423CF 801-721-6080 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of nukeflyboy Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 3:41 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Fairing Construction - How to? Just a minor point: Tim, you say "the theory is, the air coming in will hit the gear leg especially at higher angles of attack, and flow into that hole, adding pressure to the lower cowl, decreasing the differential between the upper and lower cowl". It doesn't work that way. You have to decrease the pressure at the outlet, increasing the differential pressure. It is differential pressure that drives the flow. Think of it this way - if the pressure was the same top and bottom there would be no driving force, no flow. So whatever it is that you are constructing, it needs to increase the delta P if you want more cooling flow. -------- Dave Moore RV-6 flying RV-10 QB - Need to start panel Rest almost done Breathing too much fiberglass dust Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=343813#343813 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Cumins" <jcumins(at)jcis.net>
Subject: Re: Fairing Construction - How to?
Date: Jun 22, 2011
Ok I guess I will step in here. I use to own a Cardinal and heat issues and drag issues on the 1968 cardinal version was very normal. The lower cowl has a very large opening on the back edge. Thus causing a very large ram air affect adding to the pressure in the lower cowl. Thus lowering the differential pressure. Thus poor cooling and Increased drag. The fix was a large fairing that was attached to the cowl to close up the hole, a aero dynamic air exit, thus majorly lowering the lower cowl pressure and increasing the differential pressure. And it added 5-7 knots to the cruise speed. Looking at how tight the RV-10 cowl is, if I was a betting man. I think working on enlarging the air exit area, and somehow making sure the slot where the gear leg resides preventing any air from increasing the lower cowl pressure from ram air. Reshaping the lower firewall with a fairing, to cut the friction of the air exiting the cowl and helping the air make the 90 degree to go out the bottom cowl exit. I am not sure about how affective the slots I have seen people installed in the lower center portion are either . Maybe more slots are needed. Only problem is the slots also I suspect are not that affective due to the high speed air rushing over them building a boundary layer, and causing a restriction to the air trying to exit out the slot them self's. One more Cardinal trick that really worked well to assist in cylinder cooling was to increase the distance between the aft cylinder fins and the aft baffling. We would insert small strips of 1/8 to 3/16 pieces of Baffling material between the cylinders and the aft baffling material opening that distance just a bit and it really made a very large difference in cylinder temps Just a few thoughts. Anyone want to chime in on this. I am going to have this same discussion with engineer friend and see what his thoughts are about the best way to increase the differential pressure. Between the top and bottom of the cowl. John Cumins 40864 Dimpling wing skins SB Wings. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rene Felker Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 3:03 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Fairing Construction - How to? Dave I think you miss read what Tim said. The problem is that the hole is there now, with no fairing, and thus there might be an increase in pressure in the lower cowl at higher angles of attack. It is my understanding that he is trying to build a fairing that will redirect the airflow and thus decrease the pressure in the lower cowl. I tried the same thing by putting a deflector on the back of the lower cowl. I saw no improvement so I took it off. I can't wait to see if Tim has any success with putting a fairing on the opening. During hot summer climbs I need all the cooling I can get. Rene' Felker N423CF 801-721-6080 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of nukeflyboy Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 3:41 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Fairing Construction - How to? Just a minor point: Tim, you say "the theory is, the air coming in will hit the gear leg especially at higher angles of attack, and flow into that hole, adding pressure to the lower cowl, decreasing the differential between the upper and lower cowl". It doesn't work that way. You have to decrease the pressure at the outlet, increasing the differential pressure. It is differential pressure that drives the flow. Think of it this way - if the pressure was the same top and bottom there would be no driving force, no flow. So whatever it is that you are constructing, it needs to increase the delta P if you want more cooling flow. -------- Dave Moore RV-6 flying RV-10 QB - Need to start panel Rest almost done Breathing too much fiberglass dust Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=343813#343813 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Roxanne and Mike Lefever <roxianmike(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Main gear weldment too small
Date: Jun 22, 2011
I just posted on VAF that last night after another 6 hours of grinding=2C s anding etc. I was able to insert my gear legs..............after some discu ssion with Vans=2C I really could never determine wether the housing had no t been completly honed as appropriate or the many years my kit had been sit ting had contributed significantly to the problem.....................consi dering Vans has not had many of these issues and we have not seen it on Mat ronics or VAF as an issue I think the years of the corrosion were more the problem than the design or product quality................so its fixed and my baby stood on her own last night for the first time!! Of course we had heat health warnings here yesterday and I awoke this morni ng wondering if I had hallucinated about getting the gear on at 11pm last n ight so on my way to the office I drove by the hangar to verify I was remem bering the prior evening accurately and sure enough=2C there she stood! > Subject: RV10-List: Re: Main gear weldment too small > From: woxof(at)aol.com > Date: Mon=2C 20 Jun 2011 23:26:14 -0700 > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > > > Put mine in today with very little trouble. Much easier than I anticipate d actually. I did find that the hole in the leg top was slightly smaller t han the specified drill bit so I predrilled it on the drill press first. Th at made it much easier to final drill the receiver. > > -------- > Myron Nelson > Mesa=2C AZ > Emp completed=2C QB wings completed=2C legacy build fuse in mostly done =2C finishing kit in progress. > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=343620#343620 > > > > > > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fairing Construction - How to?
From: "nukeflyboy" <flymoore(at)charter.net>
Date: Jun 22, 2011
You are right - I misread what Tim is trying to do. I suspect that the gear can flex quite a bit so you need to account for it. Have you thought of using some kind of rubber or soft material? It would have to be stiff enough to withstand the air pressure without deflecting but would allow the gear leg impact without damaging anything. Something like those thick silicone gaskets with a slit in it for gear movement. It could stay in place even when removing the lower cowl and could be glued on the inside of the cowl. -------- Dave Moore RV-6 flying RV-10 QB - Need to start panel Rest almost done Breathing too much fiberglass dust Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=343839#343839 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fairing Construction - How to?
Date: Jun 22, 2011
From: "John Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com>
Chiming in just for the thrill of mixing it up. The lower cowl is an area of High Pressure in the region of laminar flow. The Upper deck has lower pressure flowing over it to the windshield where everything can break loose. Given Tim's desire to reduce problems inherent with the STOCK Vans nose gear leg. Louvers in the lower cowl do not assist the Delta T/Delta P equation. High Pressure in the top deck. Lower pressure and need for enhanced outflow in the lower deck. The firewall, assorted added obstructions and the gear leg work against the efficient flow of High pressure air over the cooling fins and an effective extraction of heat and energy laden airflow. Correct sizing of the High pressure deck, along with well designed flow characteristics of the High Pressure deck lend themselves to caressing the airflow out of the stagnant lower deck and efficiently into the slipstream of the lower cowl. LoPresti makes a living selling the concept of changing the amount of airflow out of the lower deck (Cowl Flaps) and into the slipstream. There is a whole body of data from Deems, Robin and others on the use of James plenums and dealing with airflow and oil temp control. Is there someone who can quantifiably support more louvers in the high pressure area aid additional extraction of air coming from the High Pressure Deck? Showplanes is said to be working on an improved cowl. Maybe OSH '11 is the year to keep a watchful eye open. The Cardinal baffling idea was used by both Cirrus and GAMI to assist Continental engines in those aft cylinders. It increase high pressure flow into the lower pressure chamber. That chamber has high pressure laminar flow waiting for more louvers to mix up the dynamic flow. Maybe Kelly can chime in from Arizona. I am an advocate of a high pressure chamber designed specifically for enhanced flow which has individual cylinder fins mounted to direct the need flow over the exhaust valve and cooling fins of each cylinder. Those who have used manometers might understand my desire. More louvers, too simple to understand but popular no less. John - OSH '11 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Cumins Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 5:47 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Fairing Construction - How to? Ok I guess I will step in here. I use to own a Cardinal and heat issues and drag issues on the 1968 cardinal version was very normal. The lower cowl has a very large opening on the back edge. Thus causing a very large ram air affect adding to the pressure in the lower cowl. Thus lowering the differential pressure. Thus poor cooling and Increased drag. The fix was a large fairing that was attached to the cowl to close up the hole, a aero dynamic air exit, thus majorly lowering the lower cowl pressure and increasing the differential pressure. And it added 5-7 knots to the cruise speed. Looking at how tight the RV-10 cowl is, if I was a betting man. I think working on enlarging the air exit area, and somehow making sure the slot where the gear leg resides preventing any air from increasing the lower cowl pressure from ram air. Reshaping the lower firewall with a fairing, to cut the friction of the air exiting the cowl and helping the air make the 90 degree to go out the bottom cowl exit. I am not sure about how affective the slots I have seen people installed in the lower center portion are either . Maybe more slots are needed. Only problem is the slots also I suspect are not that affective due to the high speed air rushing over them building a boundary layer, and causing a restriction to the air trying to exit out the slot them self's. One more Cardinal trick that really worked well to assist in cylinder cooling was to increase the distance between the aft cylinder fins and the aft baffling. We would insert small strips of 1/8 to 3/16 pieces of Baffling material between the cylinders and the aft baffling material opening that distance just a bit and it really made a very large difference in cylinder temps Just a few thoughts. Anyone want to chime in on this. I am going to have this same discussion with engineer friend and see what his thoughts are about the best way to increase the differential pressure. Between the top and bottom of the cowl. John Cumins 40864 Dimpling wing skins SB Wings. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rene Felker Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 3:03 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Fairing Construction - How to? Dave I think you miss read what Tim said. The problem is that the hole is there now, with no fairing, and thus there might be an increase in pressure in the lower cowl at higher angles of attack. It is my understanding that he is trying to build a fairing that will redirect the airflow and thus decrease the pressure in the lower cowl. I tried the same thing by putting a deflector on the back of the lower cowl. I saw no improvement so I took it off. I can't wait to see if Tim has any success with putting a fairing on the opening. During hot summer climbs I need all the cooling I can get. Rene' Felker N423CF 801-721-6080 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of nukeflyboy Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 3:41 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Fairing Construction - How to? Just a minor point: Tim, you say "the theory is, the air coming in will hit the gear leg especially at higher angles of attack, and flow into that hole, adding pressure to the lower cowl, decreasing the differential between the upper and lower cowl". It doesn't work that way. You have to decrease the pressure at the outlet, increasing the differential pressure. It is differential pressure that drives the flow. Think of it this way - if the pressure was the same top and bottom there would be no driving force, no flow. So whatever it is that you are constructing, it needs to increase the delta P if you want more cooling flow. -------- Dave Moore RV-6 flying RV-10 QB - Need to start panel Rest almost done Breathing too much fiberglass dust Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=343813#343813 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Main gear weldment too small
Date: Jun 22, 2011
From: "John Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com>
Myron, any ideas on the best routing on "WN" to get from the west coast to OSH '11? Last year was PDX-LAS-MKE. Return was MDW-RNO-PDX after 32 cancellations thru MDW. Would love to thank you for Copperstate Barbeques of the past (08/09/10) and discuss that gear weldment issue. YES, I will provide cold beer to Camp Swampy even without Gary and Bob+ wives. John Cox From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Roxanne and Mike Lefever Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 6:55 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Main gear weldment too small I just posted on VAF that last night after another 6 hours of grinding, sanding etc. I was able to insert my gear legs..............after some discussion with Vans, I really could never determine wether the housing had not been completly honed as appropriate or the many years my kit had been sitting had contributed significantly to the problem.....................considering Vans has not had many of these issues and we have not seen it on Matronics or VAF as an issue I think the years of the corrosion were more the problem than the design or product quality................so its fixed and my baby stood on her own last night for the first time!! Of course we had heat health warnings here yesterday and I awoke this morning wondering if I had hallucinated about getting the gear on at 11pm last night so on my way to the office I drove by the hangar to verify I was remembering the prior evening accurately and sure enough, there she stood! > Subject: RV10-List: Re: Main gear weldment too small > From: woxof(at)aol.com > Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 23:26:14 -0700 > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > > > Put mine in today with very little trouble. Much easier than I anticipated actually. I did find that the hole in the leg top was slightly smaller than the specified drill bit so I predrilled it on the drill press first. That made it much easier to final drill the receiver. > > -------- > Myron Nelson > Mesa, AZ > Emp completed, QB wings completed, legacy build fuse in mostly done, finishing kit in progress. > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=343620#343620 > > >======================== > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Date: Jun 22, 2011
Subject: Re: Fairing Construction - How to?
As a -10 (and 8A) James cowl & plenum owner (read: disgruntled) I can tell you that the single best modification we made for reducing high CHT's and Oil Temps was the addition of 4 louvers on the underside of the cowl. Not ideal but by that point we were willing to try anything. The temps are all manageable now just passing 225 hours TTSN. I can say with little hesitation that the stock Vans cowl with standard baffling is currently the proven best option for proper cooling, running LOP etc... I have been in relatively close contact with the nice folks at Showplanes. They are getting closer but not at production stage yet. Am I going to be a guinea pig twice? Hard to know but my long range plans are to replace the James cowl at some point. (yes John I remember you want it for testing...) Unless you are one that enjoys severe migraines and tinkering vs. flying, consider using stock cowl till there is a proven alternative. Robin -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Cox Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 7:42 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Fairing Construction - How to? Chiming in just for the thrill of mixing it up. The lower cowl is an area of High Pressure in the region of laminar flow. The Upper deck has lower pressure flowing over it to the windshield where everything can break loose. Given Tim's desire to reduce problems inherent with the STOCK Vans nose gear leg. Louvers in the lower cowl do not assist the Delta T/Delta P equation. High Pressure in the top deck. Lower pressure and need for enhanced outflow in the lower deck. The firewall, assorted added obstructions and the gear leg work against the efficient flow of High pressure air over the cooling fins and an effective extraction of heat and energy laden airflow. Correct sizing of the High pressure deck, along with well designed flow characteristics of the High Pressure deck lend themselves to caressing the airflow out of the stagnant lower deck and efficiently into the slipstream of the lower cowl. LoPresti makes a living selling the concept of changing the amount of airflow out of the lower deck (Cowl Flaps) and into the slipstream. There is a whole body of data from Deems, Robin and others on the use of James plenums and dealing with airflow and oil temp control. Is there someone who can quantifiably support more louvers in the high pressure area aid additional extraction of air coming from the High Pressure Deck? Showplanes is said to be working on an improved cowl. Maybe OSH '11 is the year to keep a watchful eye open. The Cardinal baffling idea was used by both Cirrus and GAMI to assist Continental engines in those aft cylinders. It increase high pressure flow into the lower pressure chamber. That chamber has high pressure laminar flow waiting for more louvers to mix up the dynamic flow. Maybe Kelly can chime in from Arizona. I am an advocate of a high pressure chamber designed specifically for enhanced flow which has individual cylinder fins mounted to direct the need flow over the exhaust valve and cooling fins of each cylinder. Those who have used manometers might understand my desire. More louvers, too simple to understand but popular no less. John - OSH '11 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Cumins Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 5:47 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Fairing Construction - How to? Ok I guess I will step in here. I use to own a Cardinal and heat issues and drag issues on the 1968 cardinal version was very normal. The lower cowl has a very large opening on the back edge. Thus causing a very large ram air affect adding to the pressure in the lower cowl. Thus lowering the differential pressure. Thus poor cooling and Increased drag. The fix was a large fairing that was attached to the cowl to close up the hole, a aero dynamic air exit, thus majorly lowering the lower cowl pressure and increasing the differential pressure. And it added 5-7 knots to the cruise speed. Looking at how tight the RV-10 cowl is, if I was a betting man. I think working on enlarging the air exit area, and somehow making sure the slot where the gear leg resides preventing any air from increasing the lower cowl pressure from ram air. Reshaping the lower firewall with a fairing, to cut the friction of the air exiting the cowl and helping the air make the 90 degree to go out the bottom cowl exit. I am not sure about how affective the slots I have seen people installed in the lower center portion are either . Maybe more slots are needed. Only problem is the slots also I suspect are not that affective due to the high speed air rushing over them building a boundary layer, and causing a restriction to the air trying to exit out the slot them self's. One more Cardinal trick that really worked well to assist in cylinder cooling was to increase the distance between the aft cylinder fins and the aft baffling. We would insert small strips of 1/8 to 3/16 pieces of Baffling material between the cylinders and the aft baffling material opening that distance just a bit and it really made a very large difference in cylinder temps Just a few thoughts. Anyone want to chime in on this. I am going to have this same discussion with engineer friend and see what his thoughts are about the best way to increase the differential pressure. Between the top and bottom of the cowl. John Cumins 40864 Dimpling wing skins SB Wings. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rene Felker Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 3:03 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Fairing Construction - How to? Dave I think you miss read what Tim said. The problem is that the hole is there now, with no fairing, and thus there might be an increase in pressure in the lower cowl at higher angles of attack. It is my understanding that he is trying to build a fairing that will redirect the airflow and thus decrease the pressure in the lower cowl. I tried the same thing by putting a deflector on the back of the lower cowl. I saw no improvement so I took it off. I can't wait to see if Tim has any success with putting a fairing on the opening. During hot summer climbs I need all the cooling I can get. Rene' Felker N423CF 801-721-6080 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of nukeflyboy Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 3:41 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Fairing Construction - How to? Just a minor point: Tim, you say "the theory is, the air coming in will hit the gear leg especially at higher angles of attack, and flow into that hole, adding pressure to the lower cowl, decreasing the differential between the upper and lower cowl". It doesn't work that way. You have to decrease the pressure at the outlet, increasing the differential pressure. It is differential pressure that drives the flow. Think of it this way - if the pressure was the same top and bottom there would be no driving force, no flow. So whatever it is that you are constructing, it needs to increase the delta P if you want more cooling flow. -------- Dave Moore RV-6 flying RV-10 QB - Need to start panel Rest almost done Breathing too much fiberglass dust Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=343813#343813 ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Albert Gardner" <ibspud(at)roadrunner.com>
Subject: Re: Fairing Construction - How to?
Date: Jun 23, 2011
I have had to lengthen the slot on the lower cowl for the gear leg to allow the lower cowl to be removed. I have an Aerocomposits 3 blade prop and the lower cowl has to drop straight down in order to clear the spinner when removing it. Even with the longer slot forward of the gear leg I still pull down the tail to allow the front gear to drop down as far as possible. Albert Gardner N991RV Yuma, AZ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Albert Gardner" <ibspud(at)roadrunner.com>
Subject: Re: Fairing Construction - How to?
Date: Jun 23, 2011
I suffered from hi oil temps and adding a second oil cooler among other things solved most of the problem, but the final solution was to add an opening on each side under the oil coolers on the bottom cowl to allow more exit air. Temp in Yuma yesterday was 113, temp in hell was 112, so yes, Yuma is hotter than hell. Albert Gardner N991RV Yuma, AZ -----Original Message----- As a -10 (and 8A) James cowl & plenum owner (read: disgruntled) I can tell you that the single best modification we made for reducing high CHT's and Oil Temps was the addition of 4 louvers on the underside of the cowl. Not ideal but by that point we were willing to try anything. The temps are all manageable now just passing 225 hours TTSN. I can say with little hesitation that the stock Vans cowl with standard baffling is currently the proven best option for proper cooling, running LOP etc... I have been in relatively close contact with the nice folks at Showplanes. They are getting closer but not at production stage yet. Am I going to be a guinea pig twice? Hard to know but my long range plans are to replace the James cowl at some point. (yes John I remember you want it for testing...) Unless you are one that enjoys severe migraines and tinkering vs. flying, consider using stock cowl till there is a proven alternative. Robin ________________________________________________________________________________
From: John Gonzalez <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com>
Subject: Ground hull insurance which includes trailer transport with
no distance exclusion, EAA
Date: Jun 23, 2011
Here is the qoute for this annual policy that covers the above. I expect th e painting to take six weeks. I believe the plane will be taxi ing in November or December. SO for this policy for the nexe five to six months=2C the lovely insurance company through EAA want $1=2C860.00 WOW! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2011
Subject: Re: Fairing Construction - How to?
From: David Hertner <effectus(at)rogers.com>
We need to press one of those little cameras into action and record the amount of movement on the front gear leg. Dave Hertner Sent from my Samsung Captivate(tm) on Rogers ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2011
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Need PDF of Section 44 - wing assembly
I left my plans at the airport. Can someone send me or point to a copy please? Thanks. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fairing Construction - How to?
From: Seano <sean(at)braunandco.com>
Date: Jun 23, 2011
I bounced mine and figured 2.5 inches was minimum for not chipping paint on the fairings. Mine was built strictly for lower cowl removal. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 23, 2011, at 10:31, David Hertner wrote: > > We need to press one of those little cameras into action and record the amount of movement on the front gear leg. > > Dave Hertner > > Sent from my Samsung Captivate(tm) on Rogers > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2011
Subject: James Cowls-update
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Those of you with Sam James cowls will be very interested to read the article by Amy Laboda on changes that Sam has made and they are now testing. Appears in the August issue of KitPlanes which showed up in my mailbox today. It does include large inlet rings and a revised plenum. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2011
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Subject: Re: Aircraft Spruce Shipping - Always Beware
I've got a follow-up surprise on this shipping thing.... I didn't contact ACS at all. I have been too busy to even think about it. But just now, I got an email from Jim Irwin himself, letting me know that he checked into my shipping costs and had info. Apparently many products do have prompts that appear in shipping, to let them notify the customer before they would package in a way that costs us lots of money. Turns out the prompts on these fiberglass items were missing...otherwise they'd have called me first. So, they calculated what my shipping would have been, had it not shipped oversize, and only shipped standard, and they credited me back the difference....all without me even contacting them. They somehow saw my post here, and wanted to reach out and make it right. I think they did a fantastic job, so I'm pretty pleased. I've been buying from them for many years, even before I started building a plane, and they're one of the first places I check for aircraft things, because even though shipping is from Georgia at the closest, things go out the door quick and arrive quick. So, I'm glad that not only have they been good in the past, but they made this "bad" .... good. Thanks Jim, if you're reading this, you done well. Thought y'all might want to see that, because when a company does that, it shows some integrity. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2011
Subject: Re: James Cowls-update
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Per one member's request, I now have the article scanned into a PDF file for anyone else that wants to see it. 2.5MB file in color. On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > Those of you with Sam James cowls will be very interested to read the > article by Amy Laboda on changes that Sam has made and they are now testing. > Appears in the August issue of KitPlanes which showed up in my mailbox > today. It does include large inlet rings and a revised plenum. > > * > > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: James Cowls-update
Date: Jun 23, 2011
Please send the link - I have a SJ cowl on my 6A and really love it! Hearing the trials and tribulations of the -10 crowd makes me think twice about putting it on the -10 I'm contemplating! From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kelly McMullen Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 6:17 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: James Cowls-update Per one member's request, I now have the article scanned into a PDF file for anyone else that wants to see it. 2.5MB file in color. On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote: Those of you with Sam James cowls will be very interested to read the article by Amy Laboda on changes that Sam has made and they are now testing. Appears in the August issue of KitPlanes which showed up in my mailbox today. It does include large inlet rings and a revised plenum. get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: James Cowls-update
From: "Eric_Kallio" <scout019(at)msn.com>
Date: Jun 23, 2011
I would like to see it too. I am still tweaking the Plenum to work the cooling issues. That is, I would be if I ever get it back from paint. Week 10 and counting... ugh! Eric Kallio N518RV phase 1 complete, in paint Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=343950#343950 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2011
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Need PDF of Section 44 - wing assembly
Thanks to everyone who responded. I've got what I needed. Bill On 6/23/2011 12:54 PM, Bill Watson wrote: > > I left my plans at the airport. Can someone send me or point to a > copy please? > > Thanks. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Aircraft Spruce Shipping - Always Beware
From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu>
Date: Jun 23, 2011
Me too! Jim Irwin read my rant about the shipping cost of the "free shipping" battery, sent me a private email apologizing, and credited my account with the shipping I did pay. I've always used ACS for their large inventory and convenience; this is now another reason to use them! Bob -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=343957#343957 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2011
Subject: Re: James Cowls-update
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
I'll send it to you directly On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Eric_Kallio wrote: > > I would like to see it too. I am still tweaking the Plenum to work the > cooling issues. That is, I would be if I ever get it back from paint. Week > 10 and counting... ugh! > > Eric Kallio > N518RV phase 1 complete, in paint > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=343950#343950 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Main gear weldment too small
From: "woxofswa" <woxof(at)aol.com>
Date: Jun 23, 2011
John, We're not huge in MKE yet until the Airtran thing gets melded. I think going through LAS like you did last year is the best bet for us. Thanks for the kind words for the Cstate nest. Looking forward to a great turnout this year. Btw, knock on wood, but I didn't have any issues (yet) with the gear. Got her up proud on her feet and then realized how much easier some remaining composite work would be with her back on the dolly and took the legs back off for a while. Cheers, -------- Myron Nelson Mesa, AZ Emp completed, QB wings completed, legacy build fuse in mostly done, finishing kit in progress. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=343963#343963 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 24, 2011
Subject: Plugging holes in fuselage sides
From: David Hertner <effectus(at)rogers.com>
Hi Everyone, I am wondering what everyone is doing to seal the two openings at the lower front sides of the fuselage close to where the leading edge of the wing intersects the fuselage. Dave Hertner Sent from my Samsung Captivate(tm) on Rogers ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Plugging holes in fuselage sides
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Date: Jun 24, 2011
I cut a block of wood to fit, then tacked down tar paper, then covered it with a small piece of asphalt shingle. Tim Honestly, I filled the hole with clear silicone and cut it when cured to roughly match the contour. It's not a real noticeable thing when done, but I'm sure some folks agonize over it and try fancier things. On Jun 24, 2011, at 9:00 AM, David Hertner wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I am wondering what everyone is doing to seal the two openings at the lower front sides of the fuselage close to where the leading edge of the wing intersects the fuselage. > > Dave Hertner > > Sent from my Samsung Captivate(tm) on Rogers > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rene Felker" <rene(at)felker.com>
Subject: Plugging holes in fuselage sides
Date: Jun 24, 2011
I used Silicone. Rene' Felker N423CF 801-721-6080 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of David Hertner Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 8:01 AM Subject: RV10-List: Plugging holes in fuselage sides Hi Everyone, I am wondering what everyone is doing to seal the two openings at the lower front sides of the fuselage close to where the leading edge of the wing intersects the fuselage. Dave Hertner Sent from my Samsung Captivate(tm) on Rogers ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DLM" <dlm34077(at)q.com>
Subject: Re: Plugging holes in fuselage sides
Date: Jun 24, 2011
nichts ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Hertner" <effectus(at)rogers.com> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 7:00 AM Subject: RV10-List: Plugging holes in fuselage sides > > Hi Everyone, > > I am wondering what everyone is doing to seal the two openings at the > lower front sides of the fuselage close to where the leading edge of the > wing intersects the fuselage. > > Dave Hertner > > Sent from my Samsung Captivate(tm) on Rogers > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Les Kearney <kearney(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: Plugging holes in fuselage sides
Date: Jun 24, 2011
Tim North of the 49th we use duct tape for a more professional finish. Wood / shingles???? How dclass can you get. Les Sent from my iPhone On 2011-06-24, at 8:24 AM, Tim Olson wrote: > > I cut a block of wood to fit, then tacked down tar paper, then covered it with a small piece of asphalt shingle. > Tim > > Honestly, I filled the hole with clear silicone and cut it when cured to roughly match the contour. It's not a real noticeable thing when done, but I'm sure some folks agonize over it and try fancier things. > > > > > On Jun 24, 2011, at 9:00 AM, David Hertner wrote: > >> >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I am wondering what everyone is doing to seal the two openings at the lower front sides of the fuselage close to where the leading edge of the wing intersects the fuselage. >> >> Dave Hertner >> >> Sent from my Samsung Captivate(tm) on Rogers >> >> >> >> > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 24, 2011
Subject: Re: Plugging holes in fuselage sides
From: Bob Condrey <condreyb(at)gmail.com>
Proseal works well. Avoid RTV or anything with silicone because of paint adhesion issues later. Bob On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:00 AM, David Hertner wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I am wondering what everyone is doing to seal the two openings at the lower > front sides of the fuselage close to where the leading edge of the wing > intersects the fuselage. > > Dave Hertner > > Sent from my Samsung Captivate(tm) on Rogers > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 25, 2011
From: David Hertner <effectus(at)rogers.com>
Subject: Re: Plugging holes in fuselage sides
Everyone, Thanks for all of the spirited answers. I like how I can get good information and a good chuckle from this list. Dave Hertner ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 25, 2011
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: A Kindred Spirit...
A 20-year Project A 42-foot schooner isn't a big project for a ship-building company. It's a different matter if you're the one doing all the work. In the early 1990s, Dr. John Vardiman decided to build one from scratch. It took over 20 years to complete. What an great story of perseverance... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SN4kmlAxvGU&feature=player_embedded I know just how he feels... :-) Matt - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Rebuild - Post Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 170+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: David <dmaib(at)mac.com>
Subject: Re: Plugging holes in fuselage sides
Date: Jun 25, 2011
Nada! David Maib 40559 Flying On Jun 24, 2011, at 10:00 AM, David Hertner wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I am wondering what everyone is doing to seal the two openings at > the lower front sides of the fuselage close to where the leading > edge of the wing intersects the fuselage. > > Dave Hertner > > Sent from my Samsung Captivate(tm) on Rogers > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Barry Marz <blalmarz(at)embarqmail.com>
Subject: James Cowl-Kitplanes Article
Date: Jun 26, 2011
My wife Amy wrote about the latest mod we have made to our SJ cowl and plenum setup. I have done some local and cross country flights and are happy with the results. My biggest problems before the new plenum and larger rings was I could not do a quick turn in warm conditions that we have in FL. without climbing out at a fast airspeed 140-150 kias with full power and keep #5 and #6 CHT under 400f and oil temp under 220f. After a stop with 100 OAT, we were able to climb at 130 kias and keep the CHT's around 390f and the oil at 205f. At cruise at 8000-10,000' ROP or LOP I could keep CHT's 380-390f and oil temp at 195f, burning 16gal/hr ROP at 184 ktas and LOP at 11.5 gal/hr at 173 ktas. As Amy stated, we have louvers on the bottom and sides of the cowl and have opened up the bottom of the cowl for more exit area. It is very important to seal around the plenum and the engine, and have a smooth transition from the rings to the ramp for the baffles. I have 1 slick mag and 1 EIS EI. I feel the EI is a must for running LOP smoothly. Sam is all about helping out if ya have a problem so give him a call; and call or email me if ya have any questions. Blue Skys Barry ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DLM" <dlm34077(at)q.com>
Subject: Re: James Cowl-Kitplanes Article
Date: Jun 26, 2011
For those who are seeing high CHTs, have you removed the air dams on #1 an #2? Even in current weather only three of the six are between 360F and 380F for a 100-105 kt climb. Picking up 115 kt climb will lower them to below 360F. One of the keys is to dial back the prop to 2200-2250 RPM; and run "oversquare" if necessary. We usually climb at 500-800 fpm at 105 KIAS using 65% and 12-13 gph. Additional fuel flow does not seem to lower CHTs but reduced rpm does. We routinely cruise 9000-13000 at 55% LOP with 150+ KTAS and about 9 gph. At LOP the CHTs all drop to high 200s/low 300s and EGTs drop to just below 1420F. I used standard cowl, standard baffling except used the 1/8" red silicone instead of the 3/32" black Vans supplied. Also I did not seal the airbox to the cowl and removed the air dams. my 2 cents in Phoenix ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barry Marz" <blalmarz(at)embarqmail.com> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 9:35 AM Subject: RV10-List: James Cowl-Kitplanes Article > > My wife Amy wrote about the latest mod we have made to our SJ cowl and > plenum setup. I have done some local and cross country flights and are > happy with the results. > My biggest problems before the new plenum and larger rings was I could > not do a quick turn in warm conditions that we have in FL. without > climbing out at a fast airspeed 140-150 kias with full power and keep #5 > and #6 CHT under 400f and oil temp under 220f. > After a stop with 100 OAT, we were able to climb at 130 kias and keep the > CHT's around 390f and the oil at 205f. At cruise at 8000-10,000' ROP or > LOP I could > keep CHT's 380-390f and oil temp at 195f, burning 16gal/hr ROP at 184 > ktas and LOP at 11.5 gal/hr at 173 ktas. > As Amy stated, we have louvers on the bottom and sides of the cowl and > have opened up the bottom of the cowl for more exit area. It is very > important to seal around the plenum and the engine, and have a smooth > transition from the rings to the ramp for the baffles. > I have 1 slick mag and 1 EIS EI. I feel the EI is a must for running LOP > smoothly. > Sam is all about helping out if ya have a problem so give him a call; and > call or email me if ya have any questions. Blue Skys Barry > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DLM" <dlm34077(at)q.com>
Subject: A380 damage
Date: Jun 27, 2011
they fixed this pictured damage overnight at the Paris Air Show. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: James Cowl-Kitplanes Article
From: "greghale" <ghale5224(at)aol.com>
Date: Jun 27, 2011
My CHT's were also running high in Oklahoma. I trimmed my front cylinder blocking plates as Tim Olson did, and my #1 cylinder that was running high has dropped to 330 degrees (was running 380). I did notice that doing this caused my #5 & 6 cylinder tempertures to rise. During the summer I climb out at 115kts and power set at 23'/2300. This helped keep my CHTs in the 350 degree range. At cruise running LOP all the CHTs are running 330-350 at 10000'. Greg... -------- Greg Hale rv10 -- N210KH www.nwacaptain.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344267#344267 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Date: Jun 27, 2011
Subject: Re: James Cowl-Kitplanes Article
Greg, you have the Van's cowl that was actually designed for the plane. The James cowl has undersized inlet area so running LOP and cooling the CHT/Oil is more difficult when one is choking the system through reduces inlet area. Try sprinting with your mouth & one nostril closed = James Cowl & Plenum. Robin -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of greghale Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 10:49 AM Subject: RV10-List: Re: James Cowl-Kitplanes Article My CHT's were also running high in Oklahoma. I trimmed my front cylinder blocking plates as Tim Olson did, and my #1 cylinder that was running high has dropped to 330 degrees (was running 380). I did notice that doing this caused my #5 & 6 cylinder tempertures to rise. During the summer I climb out at 115kts and power set at 23'/2300. This helped keep my CHTs in the 350 degree range. At cruise running LOP all the CHTs are running 330-350 at 10000'. Greg... -------- Greg Hale rv10 -- N210KH www.nwacaptain.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344267#344267 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: MP3 type Audio amplifier?
From: Michael Kraus <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net>
Date: Jun 27, 2011
My Garmin 696 doesn't output enough power to hear the XM radio it in my headsets very well. Is anyone using any type of audio amplifier to boost their mp3 player or similar? Any recommendations on what to get, or avoid? Thanks -Mike Kraus Sent from my iPhone ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Hartwell H-5000 oil door fastener
From: "Lew Gallagher" <lewgall(at)charter.net>
Date: Jun 28, 2011
I am helping another RV owner with his cowl and he wants to install the Hartwell H-5000 oil door fastener that he picked up at Sun 'N Fun. Looking at the Hartwell spec sheet, it looks like these come in various combinations of door thickness and skin thickness. The one he gave me is .102/-.102 (stamped on trigger and latch tongue). This looks like it would work on two flush surfaces instead of the door offset in the Van's cowl. Do you just cut the lip where the fasteners go, or are others using a different depth offset on the tongue? Later, - Lew -------- non-pilot crazy about building NOW OFICIALLY BUILDER #40549 Fly off completed ! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344363#344363 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Aircraft Spruce Shipping - Always Beware
From: "bill.peyton" <peyton.b(at)sbcglobal.net>
Date: Jun 28, 2011
I just had a similar experience with ACS and shipping. I ordered 4 pieces of piano hinge and specifically asked if the 6 ft lengths were oversize. If they were, I was will to have them cut down to 4 ft. The operator said standard shipping would apply. Guess what, $42 for the hinge and $25 for the shipping! What koolaid are these guys drinking? I'm in St. louis, next time I'll drive to Wicks. -------- Bill Peyton Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344407#344407 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dawson-Townsend,Timothy" <tdawson-townsend(at)aurora.aero>
Subject: Fisher House RV-10
Date: Jun 29, 2011
Paint is finally complete! Somewhere during the (long) building process, we decided to give N52KS a li ttle side mission to promote the Fisher House Foundation with the airplane. For those not familiar, the Fisher House Foundation constructs the Fisher Houses, which are a place to stay for family members while a loved one is undergoing treatment at a neighboring military hospital or VA medical cente r. Paint is by Prestige Aircraft in Swanton, VT. Look for us at Oshkosh, parked with the other Airventure Cup racers. (anyo ne else racing?) Cheers, Tim Dawson-Townsend N52KS #40025 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: James Cowl-Kitplanes Article
From: "AirMike" <Mikeabel(at)Pacbell.net>
Date: Jun 28, 2011
I agree with Dave. I have the standard Vans engine cowl, but I cut back the air dams and show good temps except a bit high on #6. -------- See you OSH '11 Q/B - flying 1 yr+ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344411#344411 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2011
Subject: Tank sealant lifetime?
From: Chris Colohan <rv10(at)colohan.com>
I have a 3.5oz tube of tank sealant sitting in the back of my fridge, where it has sat since I bought it about a year ago. I'm now at the point where I need to glue the foam wedges into my trim tabs with tank sealant. (Yeah, I'm a slow builder -- just had my first baby...) I fear that the sealant may have gone bad, since it is supposed to only have a 4 month lifetime. So I'm curious -- is there a way of telling if tank sealant is still good? AKA, will it be obvious to me if it is unusable when I try to mix it up, or will I never know until it unexpectedly releases inside my plane on some future date? Thanks! Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fisher House RV-10
From: "AirMike" <Mikeabel(at)Pacbell.net>
Date: Jun 28, 2011
Good for you guys..................mega kuddos. Fisher House is a great charity and you are great too ! -------- See you OSH '11 Q/B - flying 1 yr+ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344412#344412 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Pascal" <rv10flyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Tank sealant lifetime?
Date: Jun 28, 2011
if it=99s for the tank, buy a new batch if it=99s (aka wedges) for anything else, 3 years and it still sticks to anything I apply it to. You=99ll be fine. Pascal From: Chris Colohan Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 8:55 PM Subject: RV10-List: Tank sealant lifetime? I have a 3.5oz tube of tank sealant sitting in the back of my fridge, where it has sat since I bought it about a year ago. I'm now at the point where I need to glue the foam wedges into my trim tabs with tank sealant. (Yeah, I'm a slow builder -- just had my first baby...) I fear that the sealant may have gone bad, since it is supposed to only have a 4 month lifetime. So I'm curious -- is there a way of telling if tank sealant is still good? AKA, will it be obvious to me if it is unusable when I try to mix it up, or will I never know until it unexpectedly releases inside my plane on some future date? Thanks! Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2011
Subject: Re: Tank sealant lifetime?
From: Chris Colohan <rv10(at)colohan.com>
Thank you! Chris On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Pascal wrote: > if it=92s for the tank, buy a new batch if it=92s (aka wedges) for anyt hing > else, 3 years and it still sticks to anything I apply it to. You=92ll be fine. > Pascal > > *From:* Chris Colohan > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 28, 2011 8:55 PM > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* RV10-List: Tank sealant lifetime? > > I have a 3.5oz tube of tank sealant sitting in the back of my fridge, whe re > it has sat since I bought it about a year ago. > > I'm now at the point where I need to glue the foam wedges into my trim ta bs > with tank sealant. (Yeah, I'm a slow builder -- just had my first baby.. .) > > I fear that the sealant may have gone bad, since it is supposed to only > have a 4 month lifetime. So I'm curious -- is there a way of telling if > tank sealant is still good? AKA, will it be obvious to me if it is unusa ble > when I try to mix it up, or will I never know until it unexpectedly relea ses > inside my plane on some future date? > > Thanks! > > Chris > > * > > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronic s.com/Navigator?RV10-List > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c * > > * > =========== =========== =========== =========== > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2011
Subject: Re: Tank sealant lifetime?
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
As long as it mixes well, it will be fine, especially for gluing stuff like those wedges, rudder and elevator trailing edges. On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Chris Colohan wrote: > I have a 3.5oz tube of tank sealant sitting in the back of my fridge, where > it has sat since I bought it about a year ago. > I'm now at the point where I need to glue the foam wedges into my trim tabs > with tank sealant. (Yeah, I'm a slow builder -- just had my first baby...) > I fear that the sealant may have gone bad, since it is supposed to only have > a 4 month lifetime. So I'm curious -- is there a way of telling if tank > sealant is still good? AKA, will it be obvious to me if it is unusable when > I try to mix it up, or will I never know until it unexpectedly releases > inside my plane on some future date? > Thanks! > Chris > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Stella" <Sstella(at)incisaledge.com>
Subject: Fisher House RV-10
Date: Jun 29, 2011
Wow Tim the plane came out great, can't wait to go flying in it. Steve Stella Fuselage #40654 521RV reserved _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dawson-Townsend,Timothy Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 11:38 PM Subject: RV10-List: Fisher House RV-10 Paint is finally complete! Somewhere during the (long) building process, we decided to give N52KS a little side mission to promote the Fisher House Foundation with the airplane. For those not familiar, the Fisher House Foundation constructs the Fisher Houses, which are a place to stay for family members while a loved one is undergoing treatment at a neighboring military hospital or VA medical center. Paint is by Prestige Aircraft in Swanton, VT. Look for us at Oshkosh, parked with the other Airventure Cup racers. (anyone else racing?) Cheers, Tim Dawson-Townsend N52KS #40025 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Hartwell H-5000 oil door fastener
From: "AirMike" <Mikeabel(at)Pacbell.net>
Date: Jun 29, 2011
These fasteners are ultra-awesome. I believe that you are correct and that they do come in different offsets. On my oil door, mine there is a slight offset of about 1/8". You need the offset to secure the door to the cowl. You also need to reinforce the outer side of the door to resist the high internal air pressure. -------- See you OSH '11 Q/B - flying 1 yr+ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344464#344464 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Hartwell H-5000 oil door fastener
From: "AirMike" <Mikeabel(at)Pacbell.net>
Date: Jun 29, 2011
pic of inside of oil door -------- See you OSH '11 Q/B - flying 1 yr+ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344465#344465 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/pc250015_859.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Lew Gallagher" <lewgall(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Hartwell H-5000 oil door fastener
Date: Jun 29, 2011
Thanks Mike. I think the 1/8" offset would be about right ... but that's not what he's got. Tonight he mentioned that others on the -8 are just using a short piece of hinge as a fastener, and pulling the pin through the firewall (the -8 has a baggage compartment/access door right at that area which makes it easy to pull) -- so no fastener showing at all. I think I can make that idea work. Later, - Lew ----- Original Message ----- From: "AirMike" <Mikeabel(at)Pacbell.net> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 6:42 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Hartwell H-5000 oil door fastener > > These fasteners are ultra-awesome. I believe that you are correct and that > they do come in different offsets. On my oil door, mine there is a slight > offset of about 1/8". You need the offset to secure the door to the cowl. > You also need to reinforce the outer side of the door to resist the high > internal air pressure. > > -------- > See you OSH '11 > Q/B - flying 1 yr+ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Date: Jun 29, 2011
Subject: Re: Hartwell H-5000 oil door fastener
Mine have an offset too. I purchased a 6 pack on ebay and have used them on 2 planes. [image: http://painttheweb.com/painttheweb/rv-10/Images/SJ_Cowl/100_2440.jpg] [image: http://painttheweb.com/painttheweb/rv-10/Images/SJ_Cowl/Cowl_Left.jpg] -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of AirMike Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 3:43 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Hartwell H-5000 oil door fastener These fasteners are ultra-awesome. I believe that you are correct and that they do come in different offsets. On my oil door, mine there is a slight offset of about 1/8". You need the offset to secure the door to the cowl. You also need to reinforce the outer side of the door to resist the high internal air pressure. -------- See you OSH '11 Q/B - flying 1 yr+ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344464#344464 ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Date: Jun 29, 2011
Subject: Re: Hartwell H-5000 oil door fastener
Note: we crafted our own hidden hinge for both the forward baggage door and oil door. Robin [image: Fwd top skin clean-up 003.jpg] -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of AirMike Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 3:55 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Hartwell H-5000 oil door fastener pic of inside of oil door -------- See you OSH '11 Q/B - flying 1 yr+ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344465#344465 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/pc250015_859.jpg ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Leffler" <rv(at)thelefflers.com>
Subject: Baffle advice
Date: Jun 29, 2011
I ran into a couple "opportunities" at the hangar this evening that I'm soliciting opinions while I research for solutions. The first issue is that the rear support brace for the baffle and one of the fuel tubes want to occupy the same space. Since the fuel injector fuel lines were installed at Lycoming, I'm not quite sure how to proceed. I'm concerned that if I attempt to bend the fuel line up, I may put a crease in the line. I'm not sure if I should be concerned that with the other five cylinders are all horizontal in the same plane, if this line is elevated to get over this bracket. Another option I thought about was to cut a slot in the bracket and isolate the fuel line with a grommet. I haven't referenced 43.13 yet to see what guidance it may provide. The next issue probably falls in the category of me doing something wrong or not doing the obvious. What's the secret to get this baffle mounted without severely bending it? Any suggestions are appreciated. 25 days and counting.. bob ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2011
From: Linn Walters <pitts_pilot(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Baffle advice
If it were me, I'd mark the baffle where the tubing is, cut a 1/2 quarter size bite out of the bracket. Clean up the edges and re-install the bracket. I'm not there yet, so don't know if I'll have the same problem. Linn On 6/29/2011 8:55 PM, Bob Leffler wrote: > > I ran into a couple "opportunities" at the hangar this evening that > I'm soliciting opinions while I research for solutions. The first > issue is that the rear support brace for the baffle and one of the > fuel tubes want to occupy the same space. Since the fuel injector > fuel lines were installed at Lycoming, I'm not quite sure how to > proceed. I'm concerned that if I attempt to bend the fuel line up, I > may put a crease in the line. I'm not sure if I should be concerned > that with the other five cylinders are all horizontal in the same > plane, if this line is elevated to get over this bracket. Another > option I thought about was to cut a slot in the bracket and isolate > the fuel line with a grommet. I haven't referenced 43.13 yet to see > what guidance it may provide. > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2011
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Baffle advice
Bob, Your best guidance is Lyc SB 342E, page 25, a specific diagram of where the lines are required to be, per AD 2008-14-07 Lycoming Engines (formerly Textron Lycoming Division, AVCO Corporation): Amendment 39-15602. I won't get into the debate as to whether it is a requirement for experimentals. Main concern with those lines is weakening the fitting joints at either end and ensuring they are adequately supported so that they don't work harden from vibration. You can gently bend in the middle, keeping bending forces away from the ends as long as you keep large radius. I wouldn't worry about elevation. The fuel is under 4-10 psi in those lines, generally. I agree with Linn's advice, to first try to remove enough of the baffle support to allow the line to remain in the location Lycoming placed it. Kelly PS, I can email you the SB direct if you need it. On 6/29/2011 5:55 PM, Bob Leffler wrote: > > I ran into a couple opportunities at the hangar this evening that > Im soliciting opinions while I research for solutions. The first > issue is that the rear support brace for the baffle and one of the > fuel tubes want to occupy the same space. Since the fuel injector fuel > lines were installed at Lycoming, Im not quite sure how to proceed. > Im concerned that if I attempt to bend the fuel line up, I may put a > crease in the line. Im not sure if I should be concerned that with > the other five cylinders are all horizontal in the same plane, if this > line is elevated to get over this bracket. Another option I thought > about was to cut a slot in the bracket and isolate the fuel line with > a grommet. I havent referenced 43.13 yet to see what guidance it may > provide. > > The next issue probably falls in the category of me doing something > wrong or not doing the obvious. Whats the secret to get this baffle > mounted without severely bending it? > > Any suggestions are appreciated. > > 25 days and counting > > bob > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Geoff Combs" <g.combs(at)aerosportmodeling.com>
Subject: Baffle advice
Date: Jun 30, 2011
Bob make a nice half round cut out in the bracket. I had to cut mine out for my Ignition coil. See link http://cdn-3-service.phanfare.com/images/external/7068012_3161550_64301362_W eb_3/0_0_c6e7e93ae7bc906cc3c993621baec8f6_1 Geoff Combs President 614-834-5227p 614-834-5230f www.aerosportmodeling.com _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Leffler Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 8:55 PM Subject: RV10-List: Baffle advice I ran into a couple "opportunities" at the hangar this evening that I'm soliciting opinions while I research for solutions. The first issue is that the rear support brace for the baffle and one of the fuel tubes want to occupy the same space. Since the fuel injector fuel lines were installed at Lycoming, I'm not quite sure how to proceed. I'm concerned that if I attempt to bend the fuel line up, I may put a crease in the line. I'm not sure if I should be concerned that with the other five cylinders are all horizontal in the same plane, if this line is elevated to get over this bracket. Another option I thought about was to cut a slot in the bracket and isolate the fuel line with a grommet. I haven't referenced 43.13 yet to see what guidance it may provide. The next issue probably falls in the category of me doing something wrong or not doing the obvious. What's the secret to get this baffle mounted without severely bending it? Any suggestions are appreciated. 25 days and counting.. bob ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 30, 2011
From: "Fred Williams, M.D." <drfred(at)suddenlinkmail.com>
Subject: Re: Baffle advice
I cut a slot in mine right where you show. Rounded the hole. no problems 3+ years. Dr Fred 515FW. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 30, 2011
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Subject: Re: Baffle advice
Same here: http://www.myrv10.com/N104CD/engine/20051107/RV200511060004.html http://www.myrv10.com/N104CD/engine/20051107/RV200511060007.html The bracket will be fine. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD On 6/30/2011 7:11 AM, Geoff Combs wrote: > Bob make a nice half round cut out in the bracket. I had to cut mine out > for my Ignition coil. > > See link > > http://cdn-3-service.phanfare.com/images/external/7068012_3161550_64301362_Web_3/0_0_c6e7e93ae7bc906cc3c993621baec8f6_1 > > **Geoff Combs** > > President > > **614-834-5227p** > 614-834-5230f > > www.aerosportmodeling.com <http://www.aerosportmodeling.com> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:*owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Bob Leffler > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 29, 2011 8:55 PM > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* RV10-List: Baffle advice > > I ran into a couple opportunities at the hangar this evening that Im > soliciting opinions while I research for solutions. The first issue is > that the rear support brace for the baffle and one of the fuel tubes > want to occupy the same space. Since the fuel injector fuel lines were > installed at Lycoming, Im not quite sure how to proceed. Im concerned > that if I attempt to bend the fuel line up, I may put a crease in the > line. Im not sure if I should be concerned that with the other five > cylinders are all horizontal in the same plane, if this line is elevated > to get over this bracket. Another option I thought about was to cut a > slot in the bracket and isolate the fuel line with a grommet. I havent > referenced 43.13 yet to see what guidance it may provide. > > The next issue probably falls in the category of me doing something > wrong or not doing the obvious. Whats the secret to get this baffle > mounted without severely bending it? > > Any suggestions are appreciated. > > 25 days and counting > > bob > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chris Hukill" <cjhukill(at)cox.net>
Subject: complete window set for sale
Date: Jun 30, 2011
I have all four windows and windshield, never unpacked, for sale.Pick up in Las Vegas, or pay for shipping. $500 for all. Chris Hukill ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 30, 2011
Subject: Re: OSH 2011 and the HQ
From: Bob Condrey <condreyb(at)gmail.com>
Tim, Thanks for posting a reminder for folks - I had intended to post something again but have been buried at work. Hope to see all at OSH - I'll likely be in the same area as in years past which is just west of where Tim usually is. Bob ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: KIT CONTENTS
From: "mds4878" <mike(at)profishenterprises.com>
Date: Jun 30, 2011
Does anybody have a list of the contents in the finish kit bags? Thanks. Mike Schulz mike(at)profishenterprises.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344531#344531 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 30, 2011
Subject: Re: KIT CONTENTS
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
http://www.myrv10.com/tips/kits/index.html On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:10 PM, mds4878 wrote: > > Does anybody have a list of the contents in the finish kit bags? > Thanks. > > Mike Schulz > mike(at)profishenterprises.com > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344531#344531 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: KIT CONTENTS
From: "mds4878" <mike(at)profishenterprises.com>
Date: Jun 30, 2011
Thank You. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344536#344536 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Leffler" <rv(at)thelefflers.com>
Subject: Baffle advice
Date: Jun 30, 2011
Here's the final result. There's about 1/8" gap between the fuel line and the bracket. I may take a little more off, just for a safety margin. From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rob Kermanj Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 5:28 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Baffle advice Cut the bracket. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 30, 2011
From: Linn Walters <pitts_pilot(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: stick grip
I'm trying to decide which stick grip to install ..... the choices are not insignificant. I'd like to know what the flying RV-10s are using for their stick grip and their recommendations. A few questions: Which grip did you choose and why. Did it meet your expectations? Did you find that you needed more functions? Which ones? Would you list the buttons you have and their function? Do you wish you'd installed another grip, and why? If you want to reply directly, I'll post a summary in a week or two. Linn ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rene Felker" <rene(at)felker.com>
Subject: stick grip
Date: Jul 01, 2011
See answers below Rene' Felker N423CF 801-721-6080 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Linn Walters Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 8:33 PM Subject: RV10-List: stick grip I'm trying to decide which stick grip to install ..... the choices are not insignificant. I'd like to know what the flying RV-10s are using for their stick grip and their recommendations. A few questions: Which grip did you choose and why. Infinity....looked cool and had lots of buttons Did it meet your expectations? It exceeded my expectations Did you find that you needed more functions? Which ones? No...maybe one to many for day to day use. Would you list the buttons you have and their function? I put a grip on each stick....this is the pilots grip (left seat) Top left (Momentary ) -- Autopilot (works to both engage and disengage the autopilot) Top Middle (Top Hat) -- Trim, pitch and roll Top Right (On-off-(on)) -- Flaps Trigger -- Press to talk Thumb -- (Momentary) Freq Switch on comm one Pinky -- (Momentary) Ident Do you wish you'd installed another grip, and why? No But, have not really used the Ident switch. The next time I am in the panel, I am thinking of changing that switch to comm 1 vs comm 2 selection. If you want to reply directly, I'll post a summary in a week or two. Linn ________________________________________________________________________________
From: David <dmaib(at)mac.com>
Subject: Re: stick grip
Date: Jul 01, 2011
I have the Infinity grips. I chose them because I liked the feel and look, good reputation, and the number of possible functions. I have the coolie hat on top controlling elevator trim and aileron trim. Green button to the left flip-flops comm 1 frequencies, black button to the right is the Vertical Power "Acknowledge" button and checklist advance, red button halfway down on the right is autopilot disconnect/ CWS, the trigger switch is PTT for the comm radios, and I have a pinkie switch that is left-off-right for rudder trim. If I was doing it again, I would not put the rudder trim switch on the grip, but would have a starter button instead. Other than that, I am very happy with the grip and the functions. David Maib 40559 Flying On Jun 30, 2011, at 10:33 PM, Linn Walters wrote: > > > I'm trying to decide which stick grip to install ..... the choices > are not insignificant. I'd like to know what the flying RV-10s are > using for their stick grip and their recommendations. > A few questions: > > Which grip did you choose and why. > > Did it meet your expectations? > > Did you find that you needed more functions? Which ones? > > Would you list the buttons you have and their function? > > Do you wish you'd installed another grip, and why? > > > If you want to reply directly, I'll post a summary in a week or two. > Linn > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flying Magazine/Dan Lloyd/Aftermath
From: "billz" <billz(at)roadrunner.com>
Date: Jul 01, 2011
Here's the article from Flying Magazine. Looks like he was "an accident looking for a place to happen". Too bad! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344568#344568 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/rv_10_accident_2_585.pdf ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: stick grip
From: David Leikam <daveleikam(at)wi.rr.com>
Date: Jul 01, 2011
I really like my Tosten CS-8 grip very much. Good price, made well. I like having fewer buttons, and the grip is very comfortable. Trigger is talk, small button under the trigger is CWS or AP disconnect, hat is trim, left button is com 1 freq swap and right button is ident. David Leikam RV10 Flying On Jul 1, 2011, at 8:23 AM, David wrote: > > I have the Infinity grips. I chose them because I liked the feel and look, good reputation, and the number of possible functions. I have the coolie hat on top controlling elevator trim and aileron trim. Green button to the left flip-flops comm 1 frequencies, black button to the right is the Vertical Power "Acknowledge" button and checklist advance, red button halfway down on the right is autopilot disconnect/CWS, the trigger switch is PTT for the comm radios, and I have a pinkie switch that is left-off-right for rudder trim. If I was doing it again, I would not put the rudder trim switch on the grip, but would have a starter button instead. Other than that, I am very happy with the grip and the functions. > > David Maib > 40559 > Flying > > On Jun 30, 2011, at 10:33 PM, Linn Walters wrote: > >> >> I'm trying to decide which stick grip to install ..... the choices are not insignificant. I'd like to know what the flying RV-10s are using for their stick grip and their recommendations. >> A few questions: >> >> Which grip did you choose and why. >> >> Did it meet your expectations? >> >> Did you find that you needed more functions? Which ones? >> >> Would you list the buttons you have and their function? >> >> Do you wish you'd installed another grip, and why? >> >> >> If you want to reply directly, I'll post a summary in a week or two. >> Linn >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich(at)verizon.net>
Subject: stick grip
Date: Jul 01, 2011
I first did the starter button (pinky switch) on the Infinity grip on my 8A. In addition to the need to add another relay (the switch does not have the current rating to control the starter solenoid directly) I found it way too easy bump with the switch with the engine running. I disconnected it after a few hours. On the 10, the switches are: Trim (coolie hat) Flap AP engage/disengage PTT Comm flip/flop I do have a locking toggle switch on the panel to select who has control of trim and flaps (pilot or co-pilot). I do this by controlling the common ground wire. My thought was to prevent a non-pilot in the seat from doing something weird, and to have an installed spare switch if the pilot stick controls fail. Carl -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of David Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 9:23 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: stick grip I have the Infinity grips. I chose them because I liked the feel and look, good reputation, and the number of possible functions. I have the coolie hat on top controlling elevator trim and aileron trim. Green button to the left flip-flops comm 1 frequencies, black button to the right is the Vertical Power "Acknowledge" button and checklist advance, red button halfway down on the right is autopilot disconnect/ CWS, the trigger switch is PTT for the comm radios, and I have a pinkie switch that is left-off-right for rudder trim. If I was doing it again, I would not put the rudder trim switch on the grip, but would have a starter button instead. Other than that, I am very happy with the grip and the functions. David Maib 40559 Flying On Jun 30, 2011, at 10:33 PM, Linn Walters wrote: > > > I'm trying to decide which stick grip to install ..... the choices > are not insignificant. I'd like to know what the flying RV-10s are > using for their stick grip and their recommendations. > A few questions: > > Which grip did you choose and why. > > Did it meet your expectations? > > Did you find that you needed more functions? Which ones? > > Would you list the buttons you have and their function? > > Do you wish you'd installed another grip, and why? > > > If you want to reply directly, I'll post a summary in a week or two. > Linn > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flying Magazine/Dan Lloyd/Aftermath
From: "tsts4" <tsts4(at)verizon.net>
Date: Jul 01, 2011
Tim ought to get a royalty out of it. It did provide some insight that I previously didn't know, but that article was still at least 95% of what Tim wrote 4 years ago. And for those for whom this is new, Tim is the unnamed friend who implored Dan to slow down and learn his avionics (Cheltons in this case), and other unheeded advise. -------- Todd Stovall 728TT (reserved) RV-10 Empacone, Wings, Fuse Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344605#344605 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 2011
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: I'm putting the wings on and the rivet callouts on 44-10 seem
wrong I'm riveting on the wing fairing support angles and note that the rivet callouts are mostly pull rivets. Seems strange since most of the rivets are easily bucked. At the same time, 2 rivets squeezed in near the flap actuator and rear spar are called out as AN470 AD4s - they are the toughest of the bunch. Anyone know what I'm missing here? Thanks Bill "so close to finishing the wing attach" Watson ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich(at)verizon.net>
Subject: I'm putting the wings on and the rivet callouts on 44-10
seem wrong
Date: Jul 01, 2011
Just did the same thing a month ago. I let common sense be my guide (used solid rivets where I could buck, pull rivets otherwise). I also added one more nutplate - on the short angle on the bottom, forward of the wing spar. Carl -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Watson Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 2:27 PM Subject: RV10-List: I'm putting the wings on and the rivet callouts on 44-10 seem wrong I'm riveting on the wing fairing support angles and note that the rivet callouts are mostly pull rivets. Seems strange since most of the rivets are easily bucked. At the same time, 2 rivets squeezed in near the flap actuator and rear spar are called out as AN470 AD4s - they are the toughest of the bunch. Anyone know what I'm missing here? Thanks Bill "so close to finishing the wing attach" Watson ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 2011
Subject: KVNY
From: bruce breckenridge <bbreckenridge(at)gmail.com>
Dearest List of Impeccable Information; I'm flying into Van Nuys next Tuesday the 5th. I need to park for 2 nights and get a car. Which FBO is suggested? There must be at least 4 of 'em! Bruce Breckenridge Portalnd, OR RV-10 Wings Christavia MK-1 lots of parts C182 Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Date: Jul 01, 2011
Subject: KVNY
I always preferred BUR over VNY. Easier in/out and seemingly less to deal with in and around the airport plus much nicer area. We always flew into Million Air where the staff was really warm and helpful to the point where they knew my family members names and always asked about my daughter's career. Million Air has a nice pilots lounge with TV, couches, recliners and flight planning facility. I think they have Enterprise vehicles there. Of the ~40 times I flew in I think they charged me just a handful for tie down. I rarely got gas from the FBO. In VNY we loved Peterson Aviation but I believe they have closed. Robin -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of bruce breckenridge Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 1:21 PM Subject: RV10-List: KVNY Dearest List of Impeccable Information; I'm flying into Van Nuys next Tuesday the 5th. I need to park for 2 nights and get a car. Which FBO is suggested? There must be at least 4 of 'em! Bruce Breckenridge Portalnd, OR RV-10 Wings Christavia MK-1 lots of parts C182 Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flying Magazine/Dan Lloyd/Aftermath
From: "tsts4" <tsts4(at)verizon.net>
Date: Jul 01, 2011
I'm glad to see that I'm not the only who feels Mac is not a good fit with EAA. His articles and blog seem geared more towards the certified crowd as if he had never left Flying. I mean his latest blog is about the lack of maintenance rules for owners. Really? Maybe we can make a trade-- Mac for Peter G. -------- Todd Stovall 728TT (reserved) RV-10 Empacone, Wings, Fuse Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344629#344629 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flying Magazine/Dan Lloyd/Aftermath
From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu>
Date: Jul 01, 2011
My only complaint about this article is that it gives the uninformed the impression that if the engine quits, you must die. Ultimately, the PIC died because he either was incapable of, or, more likely, refused to accept, landing in a corn field. -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344637#344637 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: stick grip
From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu>
Date: Jul 01, 2011
I have the Tosten on the left stick, and like the feel of it. I just use 3 functions: top hat for trim, trigger for PTT, and right rear button for autopilot disconnect. The right stick has an inexpensive Allen (I think) grip with just PTT. I don't want passengers hitting the trim switch. I installed the Allen rocker trim switch in the right-center panel, easily reached by either pilot, as a second way of running trim from the left seat or the main way from the right. My Trio autopilot will also run the trim, automatically or manually. I have the trim speeds set so the left stick runs full speed; the panel rocker runs a little slower; and the Trio auto-adjusts to run fast when airspeed is low, and runs trim slowly when airspeed is high. -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344639#344639 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flying Magazine/Dan Lloyd/Aftermath
From: "cjay" <cgfinney(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jul 01, 2011
Bob, For those of us not familiar with the story, can you enlighten us about the avoiding landing in the corn field? cjay Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344644#344644 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: stick grip
From: Michael Kraus <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net>
Date: Jul 01, 2011
I used the Teak wooden grips on my RV-4 and liked them so much that I am usi ng them on my RV-10. I have the coolie hat for trim, a PTT and an autopilot d isconnect. I am very happy with them. -Mike Kraus 40013, 19.8 hours Sent from my iPhone On Jul 1, 2011, at 8:57 PM, "Bob Turner" wrote: > > I have the Tosten on the left stick, and like the feel of it. I just use 3 functions: top hat for trim, trigger for PTT, and right rear button for au topilot disconnect. The right stick has an inexpensive Allen (I think) grip w ith just PTT. I don't want passengers hitting the trim switch. I installed t he Allen rocker trim switch in the right-center panel, easily reached by eit her pilot, as a second way of running trim from the left seat or the main wa y from the right. My Trio autopilot will also run the trim, automatically or manually. > > I have the trim speeds set so the left stick runs full speed; the panel ro cker runs a little slower; and the Trio auto-adjusts to run fast when airspe ed is low, and runs trim slowly when airspeed is high. > > -------- > Bob Turner > RV-10 QB > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344639#344639 > > > > > > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > > >

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 2011
Subject: Re: stick grip
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Vans or other source? On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Michael Kraus wrote: > I used the Teak wooden grips on my RV-4 and liked them so much that I am using them on my RV-10. I have the coolie hat for trim, a PTT and an autopilot disconnect. I am very happy with them. > -Mike Kraus > 40013, 19.8 hours > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 2011
Subject: Re: stick grip
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Disregard. Didn't see the image attached . On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > Vans or other source? > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Michael Kraus > wrote: >> I used the Teak wooden grips on my RV-4 and liked them so much that I am using them on my RV-10. I have the coolie hat for trim, a PTT and an autopilot disconnect. I am very happy with them. >> -Mike Kraus >> 40013, 19.8 hours > > >> > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Les Kearney" <kearney(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Sold on whiskers - Redux
Date: Jul 01, 2011
Hi After reading this thread, I thought I would revisit my antenna decisions. Although I have a Bob Archer (uninstalled) antenna, I think the "sold on whiskers" thread makes this to be a less than optimal antenna choice. So my questions are: * Given a SL30 / GNS 430 WAAS combo, I expect that I will need a TRIPLEXER to split a single NAV signal into a NAV/GS for the 4030 and a NAV signal for the SL30 (which I understand has an internal splitter). Is this correct. * Is there any difference, other than cost, to the RA Allen and Comant VOR / LOC / GS antennas. One is $130 and the other $290 ($CDN). Inquiring minds need to know.... Cheers Les ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Dave Saylor <dave.saylor.aircrafters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Jul 01, 2011
Subject: Re: stick grip
I have the same setup as Mike. I'm happy with it, but it took a few changes. For one, I originally had the trim in the upper left corner, and the AP disconnect in the lower right corner. I'm describing the left side. The right side is a mirror image. Each one kind of felt natural under my thumb. But I found that especially on take-off, if I didn't have the trim quite right for the load, that it was pretty difficult to push on the stick (which happens with your thumb) while also reaching up with my thumb to trim the nose down. Many times I ended up pushing with one hand and trimming with the other. Two annuals ago I swapped the two buttons and now it's much easier to trim and push at the same time. The other change was to put a guard on the AP button. It was pretty easy to accidentally push it with a map, especially on the right side. It's just a simple dish that protects the button. Dave Saylor AirCrafters 140 Aviation Way Watsonville, CA 95076 831-722-9141 Shop 831-750-0284 Cell On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Michael Kraus wrote: > I used the Teak wooden grips on my RV-4 and liked them so much that I am using them on my RV-10. I have the coolie hat for trim, a PTT and an autopilot disconnect. I am very happy with them. > -Mike Kraus > 40013, 19.8 hours > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jul 1, 2011, at 8:57 PM, "Bob Turner" wrote: > >> >> I have the Tosten on the left stick, and like the feel of it. I just use 3 functions: top hat for trim, trigger for PTT, and right rear button for autopilot disconnect. The right stick has an inexpensive Allen (I think) grip with just PTT. I don't want passengers hitting the trim switch. I installed the Allen rocker trim switch in the right-center panel, easily reached by either pilot, as a second way of running trim from the left seat or the main way from the right. My Trio autopilot will also run the trim, automatically or manually. >> >> I have the trim speeds set so the left stick runs full speed; the panel rocker runs a little slower; and the Trio auto-adjusts to run fast when airspeed is low, and runs trim slowly when airspeed is high. >> >> -------- >> Bob Turner >> RV-10 QB >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344639#344639 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > =================================== > =================================== > =================================== > =================================== >> >> >> > >

      >
      >
      > 
> ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Dave Saylor <dave.saylor.aircrafters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Jul 02, 2011
Subject: Re: stick grip
Oops, I didn't see the image either--my grips are from Vans. Dave Saylor AirCrafters 140 Aviation Way Watsonville, CA 95076 831-722-9141 Shop 831-750-0284 Cell On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Dave Saylor wrote: > I have the same setup as Mike. I'm happy with it, but it took a few changes. > > For one, I originally had the trim in the upper left corner, and the > AP disconnect in the lower right corner. I'm describing the left > side. The right side is a mirror image. Each one kind of felt > natural under my thumb. But I found that especially on take-off, if I > didn't have the trim quite right for the load, that it was pretty > difficult to push on the stick (which happens with your thumb) while > also reaching up with my thumb to trim the nose down. Many times I > ended up pushing with one hand and trimming with the other. Two > annuals ago I swapped the two buttons and now it's much easier to trim > and push at the same time. > > The other change was to put a guard on the AP button. It was pretty > easy to accidentally push it with a map, especially on the right side. > It's just a simple dish that protects the button. > > Dave Saylor > AirCrafters > 140 Aviation Way > Watsonville, CA 95076 > 831-722-9141Shop > 831-750-0284Cell > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Michael Kraus > wrote: >> I used the Teak wooden grips on my RV-4 and liked them so much that I am using them on my RV-10. I have the coolie hat for trim, a PTT and an autopilot disconnect. I am very happy with them. >> -Mike Kraus >> 40013, 19.8 hours >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Jul 1, 2011, at 8:57 PM, "Bob Turner" wrote: >> >>> >>> I have the Tosten on the left stick, and like the feel of it. I just use 3 functions: top hat for trim, trigger for PTT, and right rear button for autopilot disconnect. The right stick has an inexpensive Allen (I think) grip with just PTT. I don't want passengers hitting the trim switch. I installed the Allen rocker trim switch in the right-center panel, easily reached by either pilot, as a second way of running trim from the left seat or the main way from the right. My Trio autopilot will also run the trim, automatically or manually. >>> >>> I have the trim speeds set so the left stick runs full speed; the panel rocker runs a little slower; and the Trio auto-adjusts to run fast when airspeed is low, and runs trim slowly when airspeed is high. >>> >>> -------- >>> Bob Turner >>> RV-10 QB >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Read this topic online here: >>> >>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344639#344639 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> =================================== >> =================================== >> =================================== >> =================================== >>> >>> >>> >> >>

      >>
      >>
      >> 
>> > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Sold on whiskers - Redux
From: Jesse Saint <jesse(at)saintaviation.com>
Date: Jul 02, 2011
Les, Actually, to use one antenna for an SL-30 and a GNS-430, you need two separate items. You need a special splitter for the SL-30 that gives both VOR and G/S to both outlets, because the SL-30 needs both into one antenna connector. Then you need a Diplexer that splits VOR from G/S and gives them each to a separate antenna connector in the 430. Stein should be able to tell you the actual parts used. Unless something has changed, this is how I have had to use one antenna for both the SL-30 and the GNS-430. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. jesse(at)saintaviation.com C: 352-427-0285 F: 815-377-3694 On Jul 1, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Les Kearney wrote: > > > * Given a SL30 / GNS 430 WAAS combo, I expect that I will need a TRIPLEXER > to split a single NAV signal into a NAV/GS for the 4030 and a NAV signal for > the SL30 (which I understand has an internal splitter). Is this correct. > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 2011
Subject: Re: Sold on whiskers - Redux
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
I think I heard the new 650 has single hookup like the SL30. You sure wouldn't want to be hooking up any obsolete stuff in that new airplane. ;-)) On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Les Kearney wrote: > > Hi > > After reading this thread, I thought I would revisit my antenna decisions. > Although I have a Bob Archer (uninstalled) antenna, I think the "sold on > whiskers" thread makes this to be a less than optimal antenna choice. > > So my questions are: > > * Given a SL30 / GNS 430 WAAS combo, I expect that I will need a TRIPLEXER > to split a single NAV signal into a NAV/GS for the 4030 and a NAV signal for > the SL30 (which I understand has an internal splitter). Is this correct. > > * Is there any difference, other than cost, to the RA Allen and Comant VOR / > LOC / GS antennas. One is $130 and the other $290 ($CDN). > > Inquiring minds need to know.... > > Cheers > > Les > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Les Kearney" <kearney(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Sold on whiskers - Redux
Date: Jul 02, 2011
Hi Jessie Thanks for the info. By any chance would this be what you are referring to (as a signal splitter so I can use use two radios off one antenna)? http://www.aircraftspruce.ca/catalog/avpages/comantsplitter5120.php I already have the GNS430 slitter to split the antenna signal into the the two 430 inputs. Regards Les -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint Sent: July-02-11 6:51 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Sold on whiskers - Redux Les, Actually, to use one antenna for an SL-30 and a GNS-430, you need two separate items. You need a special splitter for the SL-30 that gives both VOR and G/S to both outlets, because the SL-30 needs both into one antenna connector. Then you need a Diplexer that splits VOR from G/S and gives them each to a separate antenna connector in the 430. Stein should be able to tell you the actual parts used. Unless something has changed, this is how I have had to use one antenna for both the SL-30 and the GNS-430. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. jesse(at)saintaviation.com C: 352-427-0285 F: 815-377-3694 On Jul 1, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Les Kearney wrote: > > > * Given a SL30 / GNS 430 WAAS combo, I expect that I will need a > TRIPLEXER to split a single NAV signal into a NAV/GS for the 4030 and > a NAV signal for the SL30 (which I understand has an internal splitter). Is this correct. > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 2011
From: Sean Stephens <sean(at)stephensville.com>
Subject: Re: Sold on whiskers - Redux
From antenna to a Garmin 013-00112-00 (http://www.avionicsmall.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=8183) with one output direct to the SL-30 and the other into a Comant CI-507 diplexer (http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/avpages/coupler507.php) to feed the 430. -Sean On 7/2/11 8:43 AM, Les Kearney wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: "Les Kearney" > > Hi Jessie > > Thanks for the info. By any chance would this be what you are referring to > (as a signal splitter so I can use use two radios off one antenna)? > http://www.aircraftspruce.ca/catalog/avpages/comantsplitter5120.php > > I already have the GNS430 slitter to split the antenna signal into the the > two 430 inputs. > > Regards > > Les > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint > Sent: July-02-11 6:51 AM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Sold on whiskers - Redux > > --> RV10-List message posted by: Jesse Saint > > Les, > > Actually, to use one antenna for an SL-30 and a GNS-430, you need two > separate items. You need a special splitter for the SL-30 that gives both > VOR and G/S to both outlets, because the SL-30 needs both into one antenna > connector. Then you need a Diplexer that splits VOR from G/S and gives them > each to a separate antenna connector in the 430. Stein should be able to > tell you the actual parts used. Unless something has changed, this is how I > have had to use one antenna for both the SL-30 and the GNS-430. > > Jesse Saint > Saint Aviation, Inc. > jesse(at)saintaviation.com > C: 352-427-0285 > F: 815-377-3694 > > On Jul 1, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Les Kearney wrote: >> >> * Given a SL30 / GNS 430 WAAS combo, I expect that I will need a >> TRIPLEXER to split a single NAV signal into a NAV/GS for the 4030 and >> a NAV signal for the SL30 (which I understand has an internal splitter). > Is this correct. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Les Kearney <kearney(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: Sold on whiskers - Redux
Date: Jul 02, 2011
Kelly Its not obsolete (like us!). It's a classic. Cheers Les Sent from my iPhone On 2011-07-02, at 7:05 AM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > > I think I heard the new 650 has single hookup like the SL30. You sure > wouldn't want to be hooking up any obsolete stuff in that new > airplane. ;-)) > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Les Kearney wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> After reading this thread, I thought I would revisit my antenna decisions. >> Although I have a Bob Archer (uninstalled) antenna, I think the "sold on >> whiskers" thread makes this to be a less than optimal antenna choice. >> >> So my questions are: >> >> * Given a SL30 / GNS 430 WAAS combo, I expect that I will need a TRIPLEXER >> to split a single NAV signal into a NAV/GS for the 4030 and a NAV signal for >> the SL30 (which I understand has an internal splitter). Is this correct. >> >> * Is there any difference, other than cost, to the RA Allen and Comant VOR / >> LOC / GS antennas. One is $130 and the other $290 ($CDN). >> >> Inquiring minds need to know.... >> >> Cheers >> >> Les >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Airventure Camper Rentals Available
From: "bcondrey" <bob.condrey(at)baesystems.com>
Date: Jul 02, 2011
I received this today because of past involvement in coordinating with them for setting up RVs in the RV-10 group area. If interested please contact them directly. He mentions a donation to the "RV-10 group" for each camper but since there isn't a formal group this year maybe you can discuss a discount instead. Bob ------------------------------------------------------------- Bob, We have met you in the past when we have dropped off rental campers for some of your group. My wife Cindy and I have been renting campers at EAA Airventure for 13 years. First under our prior company Fox Valley RV Rental and now Event RV Rental as we have discontinued day to day rentals other than EAA. Your group can check out our website: www.eventrv.com to view the available campers. We have the units discounted as the event is getting close and we want to book all of our available campers. Make sure the renter mentions they are with the RV-10 group. Well keep a list and when we see you to drop the campers we will make our donation. I would like to see how this goes for 2011 and maybe we can continue the program into 2012. I am very big on network marketing as it goes much further than other modes. If you want to give us a call our phone number is 920-756-2494. Or you may e-mail us back at eventrv(at)frontier.com Dan & Cindy Push Event RV Rental, LLC Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344689#344689 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flying Magazine/Dan Lloyd/Aftermath
From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu>
Date: Jul 02, 2011
My understanding is that the engine quit while over a corn field. It appears he tried to stretch the glide to a nearby road? At any rate, the aircraft impacted a perfectly good field nose-first. Certainly appears to be an unintentional stall at too low an altitude to recover. -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344702#344702 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: John Ackerman <johnag5b(at)cableone.net>
Subject: Boulder area airports
Date: Jul 02, 2011
Hey folks- We'll be flying into Boulder, CO for a couple days to and from OSH. Any suggestions for airports/FBOs? On the way out, we'll probably take a fuel break at Las Vegas NM (KLVS.) Thanks Marlys and John Ackerman ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 2011
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Sold on whiskers - Redux
Figured I could get a rise.....with all these folks installing bleeding edge avionics. I assume you are putting in a trusty ADF or two to navigate around your fine country? I was just looking at the route along the AlCan Highway and I don't recall it being a dashed line in the past, and I didn't see VHF airways that I recall being their in the past. On 7/2/2011 7:55 AM, Les Kearney wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: Les Kearney > > Kelly > > Its not obsolete (like us!). It's a classic. > > Cheers > > Les > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2011-07-02, at 7:05 AM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > >> --> RV10-List message posted by: Kelly McMullen >> >> I think I heard the new 650 has single hookup like the SL30. You sure >> wouldn't want to be hooking up any obsolete stuff in that new >> airplane. ;-)) >> >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Les Kearney wrote: >>> --> RV10-List message posted by: "Les Kearney" >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> After reading this thread, I thought I would revisit my antenna decisions. >>> Although I have a Bob Archer (uninstalled) antenna, I think the "sold on >>> whiskers" thread makes this to be a less than optimal antenna choice. >>> >>> So my questions are: >>> >>> * Given a SL30 / GNS 430 WAAS combo, I expect that I will need a TRIPLEXER >>> to split a single NAV signal into a NAV/GS for the 4030 and a NAV signal for >>> the SL30 (which I understand has an internal splitter). Is this correct. >>> >>> * Is there any difference, other than cost, to the RA Allen and Comant VOR / >>> LOC / GS antennas. One is $130 and the other $290 ($CDN). >>> >>> Inquiring minds need to know.... >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Les >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 2011
From: Linn Walters <pitts_pilot(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Boulder area airports
On 7/2/2011 2:22 PM, John Ackerman wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: John Ackerman > > Hey folks- > We'll be flying into Boulder, CO for a couple days to and from OSH. Any suggestions for airports/FBOs? > On the way out, we'll probably take a fuel break at Las Vegas NM (KLVS.) And you think avgas is expensive!!! :-P Linn > Thanks > Marlys and John Ackerman > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 2011
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Boulder area airports
John, the Boulder airport itself if fine, but you need to be familiar with their glider pattern, and powered patterns. There is self-serve fuel. There really is only one FBO. There is an Enterprise office about 1 mi away if you need a car, but like most they are closed Sat. noon to Mon. morning. There may be a little cheaper fuel at Vance Brand, Longmont. I've never been in there so can't comment. Alomosa or Raton would be much cheaper fuel than LVS. When I go to Boulder, I usually top off at St. Johns, then go direct. On 7/2/2011 11:22 AM, John Ackerman wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: John Ackerman > > Hey folks- > We'll be flying into Boulder, CO for a couple days to and from OSH. Any suggestions for airports/FBOs? > On the way out, we'll probably take a fuel break at Las Vegas NM (KLVS.) > Thanks > Marlys and John Ackerman > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 2011
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: WxWorx REWX9ID USB Weather Receiver For Sale...
I have a 1-year old WxWorx REWX9ID USB XM Aircraft Weather and XM Audio receiver for sale. It was just removed from my RV-8 and is in perfect working order. Includes Antenna, Mount, Receiver Unit, and USB Interface. It is compatible with the Grand Rapids EFISs and a number of others. Gives text and graphical representations of weather including Rain, Wind, Temp, etc. Requires separate monthly XM subscription which is not included in this offering. Attached are some pictures of the actual unit for sale. Works great and I wouldn't fly without a similar product. I'm replacing the functionality with an ADS-B receiver. Additional information on the unit can be found here: https://www.wxworx.com/portable-receiver-overview https://www.wxworx.com/interface-modules Aircraft Spruce has the unit for $595: http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/avpages/fl190True.php I will take $400 firm for the unit as shown plus $10 for shipping. First come, first served. Email me with questions. I can accept PayPal http://www.paypal.com using "dralle@matronics.com" or I can accept Visa/MC directly. I will take a 2.5% discount for a check, but it will have to clear before I ship. Best regards, Matt Dralle - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Rebuild - Post Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 170+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flying Magazine/Dan Lloyd/Aftermath
From: "woxofswa" <woxof(at)aol.com>
Date: Jul 02, 2011
I joined the community right before this tragic accident. Rightly or wrongly, my impression after reading the article is to place more blame on the engine packager than I previously felt. -------- Myron Nelson Mesa, AZ Emp completed, QB wings completed, legacy build fuse in mostly done, finishing kit in progress. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344762#344762 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Sold on whiskers - Redux
From: Jesse Saint <jesse(at)saintaviation.com>
Date: Jul 03, 2011
The picture doesn't look what I used, but the description sounds like exactly what you would need. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. jesse(at)saintaviation.com C: 352-427-0285 F: 815-377-3694 On Jul 2, 2011, at 9:43 AM, Les Kearney wrote: > > Hi Jessie > > Thanks for the info. By any chance would this be what you are referring to > (as a signal splitter so I can use use two radios off one antenna)? > http://www.aircraftspruce.ca/catalog/avpages/comantsplitter5120.php > > I already have the GNS430 slitter to split the antenna signal into the the > two 430 inputs. > > Regards > > Les > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint > Sent: July-02-11 6:51 AM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Sold on whiskers - Redux > > > Les, > > Actually, to use one antenna for an SL-30 and a GNS-430, you need two > separate items. You need a special splitter for the SL-30 that gives both > VOR and G/S to both outlets, because the SL-30 needs both into one antenna > connector. Then you need a Diplexer that splits VOR from G/S and gives them > each to a separate antenna connector in the 430. Stein should be able to > tell you the actual parts used. Unless something has changed, this is how I > have had to use one antenna for both the SL-30 and the GNS-430. > > Jesse Saint > Saint Aviation, Inc. > jesse(at)saintaviation.com > C: 352-427-0285 > F: 815-377-3694 > > On Jul 1, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Les Kearney wrote: >> >> >> * Given a SL30 / GNS 430 WAAS combo, I expect that I will need a >> TRIPLEXER to split a single NAV signal into a NAV/GS for the 4030 and >> a NAV signal for the SL30 (which I understand has an internal splitter). > Is this correct. >> > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 2011
From: Linn Walters <pitts_pilot(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Flying Magazine/Dan Lloyd/Aftermath
On 7/3/2011 1:47 AM, woxofswa wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: "woxofswa" > > I joined the community right before this tragic accident. > > Rightly or wrongly, I think wrongly. > my impression after reading the article is to place more blame on the engine packager than I previously felt. When you know Dan's mindset .... OSH at all costs ..... there's no knowing what else he didn't do (besides not flying off phase one hours) in relation to the engine. I have no dog in this fight, but my experience tells me that no matter how long it took, it was an accident waiting to happen. The whole scenario is prime fodder for an accident seminar. I only know what I've read here and the NTSB report ..... and I never knew Dan ..... but I feel a loss nonetheless. I have this nagging thought that there must have been something someone could have done ..... but it seems he blew off those that tried to help. No matter what, it was a sad event and I hope we learned something from it. Linn > -------- > Myron Nelson > Mesa, AZ > Emp completed, QB wings completed, legacy build fuse in mostly done, finishing kit in progress. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344762#344762 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 2011
From: Matt Gabrielson <m.gabrielson(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Boulder area airports
Vance Brand does have cheaper fuel. The FBO fuel is fine and the other fuel is available back north of the hangars on a taxiway at the NE corner of the airport - its self serve only (a little competition). The FBO building isn't much but it has the bare basics. Not familiar with the rental cars (my folks live there) but there used to be an Enterprise relatively close. Watch for parachute jumping activity - they have a VERY active jump club. Matt Gabrielson ________________________________ From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com> Sent: Sat, July 2, 2011 3:31:29 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Boulder area airports John, the Boulder airport itself if fine, but you need to be familiar with their glider pattern, and powered patterns. There is self-serve fuel. There really is only one FBO. There is an Enterprise office about 1 mi away if you need a car, but like most they are closed Sat. noon to Mon. morning. There may be a little cheaper fuel at Vance Brand, Longmont. I've never been in there so can't comment. Alomosa or Raton would be much cheaper fuel than LVS. When I go to Boulder, I usually top off at St. Johns, then go direct. On 7/2/2011 11:22 AM, John Ackerman wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: John Ackerman > > Hey folks- > We'll be flying into Boulder, CO for a couple days to and from OSH. Any >suggestions for airports/FBOs? > On the way out, we'll probably take a fuel break at Las Vegas NM (KLVS.) > Thanks > Marlys and John Ackerman > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: stick grip
From: "rv10flyer" <wayne.gillispie(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jul 03, 2011
Fabricated my own out of African zebrawood. CWS/PTT on pilot side and PTT on copilot side. -------- Wayne Gillispie, A&P 5/93, PPC 10/08 Bldr# 40983 SB Started 12/1/09. Fuselage Sec 46 Eng mount/Gear- 1359 hrs to date. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344779#344779 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "gary" <speckter(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Flying Magazine/Dan Lloyd/Aftermath
Date: Jul 03, 2011
Dan blew off offers of help from several other folks too, He was not willing to listen to others. Gary Specketer -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Linn Walters Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 8:17 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Flying Magazine/Dan Lloyd/Aftermath On 7/3/2011 1:47 AM, woxofswa wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: "woxofswa" > > I joined the community right before this tragic accident. > > Rightly or wrongly, I think wrongly. > my impression after reading the article is to place more blame on the engine packager than I previously felt. When you know Dan's mindset .... OSH at all costs ..... there's no knowing what else he didn't do (besides not flying off phase one hours) in relation to the engine. I have no dog in this fight, but my experience tells me that no matter how long it took, it was an accident waiting to happen. The whole scenario is prime fodder for an accident seminar. I only know what I've read here and the NTSB report ..... and I never knew Dan ..... but I feel a loss nonetheless. I have this nagging thought that there must have been something someone could have done ..... but it seems he blew off those that tried to help. No matter what, it was a sad event and I hope we learned something from it. Linn > -------- > Myron Nelson > Mesa, AZ > Emp completed, QB wings completed, legacy build fuse in mostly done, finishing kit in progress. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344762#344762 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "preid" <rv10flyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Flying Magazine/Dan Lloyd/Aftermath
Date: Jul 03, 2011
Each one of us has a responsibility to fly the plane, know the details of the flight area and airports, and ultimately assure the plane will arrive at the destination safely (aka weather, winds, etc) Anyone who would fly a plane from Penn to Florida with no working instruments and a faulty engine , than deny hearing warning from expensive avionics and experienced builders needs to take full responsibilty, not the subpar engine builder. I just completed the transition training in Texas, Don McDonald gave me great insight and Alex great training, Dan decided to not get HP endorsement and training in a aircraft, to make matters worse he never setup all the ranges, than there is the shortcut of hours of training he needed. I have to admit after the training I did with Alex, Dan must have been a heck of a pilot to be able to do everything he did to fly the plane "blind". This is what makes it so sad, I think Dan was a great pilot he just made numerous bad decisions to deny him to be all he was capable of. Yes, the suburu and PSRU were "experimental" but regardless this falls completely on the PIC and the final decision on what to do regardless of any outside pressures. I agree, I initially felt there was outside pressures applied on Dan to get that engine to OSH. -------------------------------------------------- From: "woxofswa" <woxof(at)aol.com> Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2011 10:47 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Flying Magazine/Dan Lloyd/Aftermath > > I joined the community right before this tragic accident. > > Rightly or wrongly, my impression after reading the article is to place > more blame on the engine packager than I previously felt. > > -------- > Myron Nelson > Mesa, AZ > Emp completed, QB wings completed, legacy build fuse in mostly done, > finishing kit in progress. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344762#344762 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flying Magazine/Dan Lloyd/Aftermath
From: David Leikam <daveleikam(at)wi.rr.com>
Date: Jul 03, 2011
I was on the fence about using an engine package like Dan used. I talked to him on several occasions about his choice and was anxiously waiting to see his progress. After meeting him and seeing his plane at OSH, I realized two things: 1. The lack of care and attention to detail and safety in his build. 2. The engine package he chose was no where near being ready for a "plug and play" install as the vendor touted. I also was very disturbed that his engine provider was supporting his rushed and dangerous if not illegal progress. I quickly came off the fence, purchased a new IO-540 from Van's and have never looked back. That said, I believe his engine choice had very little if anything to do with his crash. It was simply Dan's dangerous rush to get the thing flying and sort out the details later. >From the pictures published at the time, it appears he was trying to get the plane over a road and into the next field but landed before the road and slid hard into the embankment which destroyed and burned the plane. The wreckage ended up in the middle of the road. Probably a good example of why we should all practice those engine out approaches to a forced landing. The few times I spoke with Dan he was a great guy to talk to. At that time, I was just getting started with my build and was eager to pick everyones brain who was ahead of me. No matter what question you asked of Dan, he would always try to lead you to believe he knew exactly what he was doing. RIP Dave Leikam On Jul 3, 2011, at 11:51 AM, gary wrote: > > Dan blew off offers of help from several other folks too, He was not willing > to listen to others. > > Gary Specketer > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Linn Walters > Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 8:17 AM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Flying Magazine/Dan Lloyd/Aftermath > > > On 7/3/2011 1:47 AM, woxofswa wrote: >> --> RV10-List message posted by: "woxofswa" >> >> I joined the community right before this tragic accident. >> >> Rightly or wrongly, > I think wrongly. >> my impression after reading the article is to place more blame on the > engine packager than I previously felt. > When you know Dan's mindset .... OSH at all costs ..... there's no > knowing what else he didn't do (besides not flying off phase one hours) > in relation to the engine. I have no dog in this fight, but my > experience tells me that no matter how long it took, it was an accident > waiting to happen. The whole scenario is prime fodder for an accident > seminar. I only know what I've read here and the NTSB report ..... and > I never knew Dan ..... but I feel a loss nonetheless. I have this > nagging thought that there must have been something someone could have > done ..... but it seems he blew off those that tried to help. No matter > what, it was a sad event and I hope we learned something from it. > Linn >> -------- >> Myron Nelson >> Mesa, AZ >> Emp completed, QB wings completed, legacy build fuse in mostly done, > finishing kit in progress. >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344762#344762 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Minimum disatance for multiple GPS antenna placement?
From: "jayb" <jaybrinkmeyer(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jul 03, 2011
Does anyone know if there's a min distance requirement for placing GPS Antennas? One for GNS430W and the other for Navworx ADS-B GPS... I have the GNS430W GPS Ant mounted just aft of the cabin top. Thanks, Jay Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344803#344803 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 2011
From: Linn Walters <pitts_pilot(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Minimum disatance for multiple GPS antenna placement?
Multiple GPS antennas work well side-by-side. I'd keep at least 2' spacing between GPS antennas and anything that transmits. The farther the better. Linn On 7/3/2011 4:19 PM, jayb wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: "jayb" > > Does anyone know if there's a min distance requirement for placing GPS Antennas? One for GNS430W and the other for Navworx ADS-B GPS... I have the GNS430W GPS Ant mounted just aft of the cabin top. > > Thanks, > Jay > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344803#344803 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Minimum disatance for multiple GPS antenna placement?
From: Seano <sean(at)braunandco.com>
Date: Jul 03, 2011
Garmin states min edge distance as 6" and offset from each other. That's from the g3x manual for distance between the g3x gps/XM and another gps antenna such as the 430w. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 3, 2011, at 14:19, "jayb" wrote: > > Does anyone know if there's a min distance requirement for placing GPS Antennas? One for GNS430W and the other for Navworx ADS-B GPS... I have the GNS430W GPS Ant mounted just aft of the cabin top. > > Thanks, > Jay > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344803#344803 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: WxWorx REWX9ID USB Weather Receiver For Sale...
From: "kevino" <kevino(at)worldwarehouse.com>
Date: Jul 03, 2011
Have been thinking about doing the same. Are you going with navworx? Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344811#344811 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Minimum disatance for multiple GPS antenna placement?
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Date: Jul 03, 2011
I can't remember but something about 18" or 24" comes to mind. Tim On Jul 3, 2011, at 3:19 PM, "jayb" wrote: > > Does anyone know if there's a min distance requirement for placing GPS Antennas? One for GNS430W and the other for Navworx ADS-B GPS... I have the GNS430W GPS Ant mounted just aft of the cabin top. > > Thanks, > Jay > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344803#344803 > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 2011
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Flying Magazine/Dan Lloyd/Aftermath
As builder and PIC, the blame cannot easily be laid elsewhere. However, I had a bit of contact with the plane and the people at OSH that year. I quickly surmised that there was an enabler of this unfortunate chain of events. I didn't like what I saw. > I also was very disturbed that his engine provider was supporting his rushed and dangerous if not illegal progress.... There is wisdom in the CW regarding accidents; they usually occur as the result of a chain of events. There's little value in assessing choices made on the fateful flight... it was just the end of an unfortunately unbroken chain. I wish I had a chance to meet and know Dan a bit. Sounded like a great guy. Bill "glowing after torquing the spar bolts" Watson ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 2011
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Re: ATSB Transceiver...
At 02:07 PM 7/3/2011 Sunday, you wrote: > >Have been thinking about doing the same. Are you going with navworx? I ordered the ADS600-B unit from NavWorx: <http://www.navworx.com/ads600-b.asp>http://www.navworx.com/ads600-b.asp Here's their main site: <http://www.navworx.com/index.asp>http://www.navworx.com/index.asp They're not exactly cheap. Here's the price list: <http://navworx.americommerce.com/store/c/21-Buy-Your-NavWorx-ADS600-or-PADS600-Online-Now.aspx>http://navworx.americommerce.com/store/c/21-Buy-Your-NavWorx-ADS600-or-PADS600-Online-Now.aspx I also ordered it with the WIFI module and the ARINC-429 for fun. Matt - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 170+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 2011
From: Patrick Pulis <rv10free2fly(at)yahoo.com.au>
Subject: RV-10 Fibreglass Plenum Vs Carbon Fibre
Can anyone please tell me if they have purchased and installed the fibregla ss RV-10 plenum available from the folks at 'rvbits' in South Africa?=0A- =0Ahttp://www.rvbits.com/=0A-=0Ahttp://rvbits.mybigcommerce.com/products/ RV10-GLASS-PLENUM-LID.html=0A-=0Ahttp://rvbits.mybigcommerce.com/products /RV10-CARBON-PLENUM-LID.html=0A-=0AHow well will the fibreglass hold up t o the heat of the engine compared with the carbon fibre please?=0A-=0AIs this a worthwhile modification to reduce engine temperatures?=0A-=0AThank you in advance for your responses.=0A-=0AKind regards=0A-=0APatrick Pu lis=0AAdelaide, South Australia=0A#40299 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Date: Jul 03, 2011
Subject: RV-10 Fibreglass Plenum Vs Carbon Fibre
As the owner of 3 planes with Plenums (2 fiberglass, 1 metal) I would (strongly) recommend the standard baffle system. After years of fiddling around with plenums unless I was building a race plane a lot of effort on aero improvements I don=92t see the value of a plenum, I only experienced t he headaches. Look at all the flying Cessna=92s, Cirrus=92, Corvallis etc=85 N one of those production planes need a Plenum. Add all the additional time it takes to remove the plenum top when doing injector balancing, spear plug removal, engine inspection, general maintanance for what gain? You may say how much time can it take to remove & install the plenum? Well my Plenum on the -10 has probably been on & off 300+ times (thank you James Cowl). Once you integrate a Plenum into your system and then you have issues like inability to easily fly LOP or CHT issues you are then stuck with another variable to consider in resolving the problems where the problem may actually be the Plenum. I look at most people=92s factory build with Vans cowl and basic baffles an d their planes generally fly LOP & have reasonable temps etc=85 If we build another -10 there will be NO Plenum. As an observation of the Plenums you listed. None of them follow the ideal theoretical design of a plenum which is a smooth transition to every expanding volume. The ideal plenum would be a mate to the underside of the cowl getting substantially taller as you work aft. Finally a plenum on an IO-360 is MUCH easier because you don=92t have the o il tube mid-deck that you have to build around. My recommendation is spend your time & money making a great looking & fitting baffle system and move on. Robin *From:* owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Patrick Pulis *Sent:* Sunday, July 03, 2011 3:57 PM *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com *Subject:* RV10-List: RV-10 Fibreglass Plenum Vs Carbon Fibre Can anyone please tell me if they have purchased and installed the fibreglass RV-10 plenum available from the folks at 'rvbits' in South Africa? http://www.rvbits.com/ http://rvbits.mybigcommerce.com/products/RV10-GLASS-PLENUM-LID.html http://rvbits.mybigcommerce.com/products/RV10-CARBON-PLENUM-LID.html How well will the fibreglass hold up to the heat of the engine compared wit h the carbon fibre please? Is this a worthwhile modification to reduce engine temperatures? Thank you in advance for your responses. Kind regards Patrick Pulis Adelaide, South Australia #40299 * * * * ===========* ===========* ===========* ===========* * * ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Leffler" <rv(at)thelefflers.com>
Subject: RV-10 Fibreglass Plenum Vs Carbon Fibre
Date: Jul 03, 2011
Patrick, I can't answer your question directly, but I suspect that Jan uses the same epoxy for both his carbon fiber and fiberglass layups. The epoxy would be more sensitive to heat than either the carbon or fiberglass. Epoxy that is room temperature cured is also going to be more sensitive to heat than epoxy that is cured in an oven. Jan is the only one to answer this question. I too would be interested in real test data that shows temperatures with and without the plenum. I wouldn't think that the carbon fiber would have any advantage other than weighing less. bob From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Patrick Pulis Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 6:57 PM Subject: RV10-List: RV-10 Fibreglass Plenum Vs Carbon Fibre Can anyone please tell me if they have purchased and installed the fibreglass RV-10 plenum available from the folks at 'rvbits' in South Africa? http://www.rvbits.com/ http://rvbits.mybigcommerce.com/products/RV10-GLASS-PLENUM-LID.html http://rvbits.mybigcommerce.com/products/RV10-CARBON-PLENUM-LID.html How well will the fibreglass hold up to the heat of the engine compared with the carbon fibre please? Is this a worthwhile modification to reduce engine temperatures? Thank you in advance for your responses. Kind regards Patrick Pulis Adelaide, South Australia #40299 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 2011
Subject: IO 540 hardware question
From: John Trollinger <john(at)trollingers.com>
Does anyone know if there are AN equivalents to the LW-25-XXX bolts used to mate the halves of the crankshaft case? thanks, John Trollinger ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 2011
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: IO 540 hardware question
No. The Lycoming bolts are coarse thread, 1/4 by 20 pitch. AN 4 bolts are 1/4 by 28 pitch. On 7/3/2011 5:43 PM, John Trollinger wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: John Trollinger > > Does anyone know if there are AN equivalents to the LW-25-XXX bolts > used to mate the halves of the crankshaft case? > > thanks, > > John Trollinger > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 2011
Subject: Greg Hale is in Sport Aviation this month
From: William Curtis <wcurtis(at)nerv10.com>
I don't do Facebook and so have previously ignored the Facebook icon on the Van's homepage. I decided to take a look at what was out there and I see Van's has a pretty pointed commentary on Greg's aircraft. The title of the article is "WHAT PRICE MASTERPIECE?<http://www.facebook.com/notes/vans-aircraft-inc/what-price-masterpiece-by-dick-vangrunsven/237594966250883> " http://www.facebook.com/notes/vans-aircraft-inc/what-price-masterpiece-by-dick-vangrunsven/237594966250883 The article touches on a number of items, increased gross weight, seats, shoulder harness and additional fuel tanks in the wings. The additional fuel in the wings is relevant to Matronics thread 75832<http://www.matronics.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=78532> . -- William N40237 - http://wcurtis.nerv10.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dawson-Townsend,Timothy" <tdawson-townsend(at)aurora.aero>
Subject: EGT probe?
Date: Jul 04, 2011
All of the sudden, one EGT (#3) is lagging about 200 degrees behind his bro thers, with no other symptoms from the engine. It's consistent despite pow er setting, leaning, one mag or the other. CHTs are fine, and engine is sm ooth. Is there a failure mode like that for GRT EIS EGT probes? Haven't tried swapping probes around yet, but will do that next to isolate it. Tim D-T N52KS ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: EGT probe?
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Date: Jul 03, 2011
I'd check any connections on that probe wire. Tim On Jul 3, 2011, at 11:18 PM, "Dawson-Townsend,Timothy" wrote: > All of the sudden, one EGT (#3) is lagging about 200 degrees behind his br others, with no other symptoms from the engine. It's consistent despite pow er setting, leaning, one mag or the other. CHTs are fine, and engine is smo oth. > > Is there a failure mode like that for GRT EIS EGT probes? > > Haven't tried swapping probes around yet, but will do that next to isolate it. > > Tim D-T > N52KS > > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 2011
From: Patrick Pulis <rv10free2fly(at)yahoo.com.au>
Subject: RV-10 Fibreglass Plenum Vs Carbon Fibre
Many thanks to all who responded to my enquiry, its really appreciated.- I really like you guys because of your openness, honesty and best of all yo ur experience.- I can't even imagine removing my cowls 300+ times, ouch. =0A-=0AIs it worthwhile upgrading the rubber baffle seal material as supp lied by Vans (black and rigid I think from memory), to a silicone sheet mat erial that is a little more supple and more easily conforms to the shape of the upper cowl?=0A-=0AI see that baffle material is availabe as follows: =0A-=0Ahttp://www.aeroinstock.com/products/Baffle-Seal/6211/0/product_cat /index.html=0A-=0Ahttp://www.skygeek.com/cs085x3x108g.html=0A-=0Ahttp:/ /www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/appages/ams3320siliconebaffleseal.php=0A- =0AAny further guidance would be appreciated please.=0A-=0AKind regards =0A-=0APat ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 2011
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: RV-10 Fibreglass Plenum Vs Carbon Fibre
Consider McFarlane's Baffle Saver silicone seal. A bit more money, prevents abrasion of cowling by silicone. On 7/3/2011 9:58 PM, Patrick Pulis wrote: > Many thanks to all who responded to my enquiry, its really > appreciated. I really like you guys because of your openness, honesty > and best of all your experience. I can't even imagine removing my > cowls 300+ times, ouch. > Is it worthwhile upgradingthe rubber baffle seal material as supplied > by Vans (black and rigid I think from memory), to a silicone sheet > material that is a little more supple and more easily conforms to the > shape of the upper cowl? > I see that baffle material is availabe as follows: > http://www.aeroinstock.com/products/Baffle-Seal/6211/0/product_cat/index.html > http://www.skygeek.com/cs085x3x108g.html > http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/appages/ams3320siliconebaffleseal.php > Any further guidance would be appreciated please. > Kind regards > Pat > * > > > * ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DLM" <dlm34077(at)q.com>
Subject: Re: EGT probe?
Date: Jul 03, 2011
Yes, you are about to burn off the tip; this is pretty standard for the GRT EIS probes, I burnt 4 in less than 300TT. I have since switched them all to he EI probes although still using the GRT EIS 6000. ----- Original Message ----- From: Dawson-Townsend,Timothy To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 9:18 PM Subject: RV10-List: EGT probe? All of the sudden, one EGT (#3) is lagging about 200 degrees behind his brothers, with no other symptoms from the engine. It's consistent despite power setting, leaning, one mag or the other. CHTs are fine, and engine is smooth. Is there a failure mode like that for GRT EIS EGT probes? Haven't tried swapping probes around yet, but will do that next to isolate it. Tim D-T N52KS ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 2011
From: Linn Walters <pitts_pilot(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: RV-10 Fibreglass Plenum Vs Carbon Fibre
I've been planning on a plenum ever since I started my -10 kit. I never thought about the problem of having to remove it to make changes during phase 1. What a wake-up call. However, I planned on attaching my plenum top to the standard baffles ..... which, of course, prevents me from buying a third-party plenum. So now I'm back to the plenum idea ..... but will do my phase 1 with the cowl baffle seal and then remove it, replacing it with the plenum top. I've always hated the cowl seal because making a perfect baffle seal is next to impossible and it always degrades over time making it a PITA to maintain instead of fly. Linn On 7/4/2011 1:04 AM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > > Consider McFarlane's Baffle Saver silicone seal. A bit more money, > prevents abrasion of cowling by silicone. > > > On 7/3/2011 9:58 PM, Patrick Pulis wrote: >> Many thanks to all who responded to my enquiry, its really >> appreciated. I really like you guys because of your openness, >> honesty and best of all your experience. I can't even imagine >> removing my cowls 300+ times, ouch. >> Is it worthwhile upgradingthe rubber baffle seal material as supplied >> by Vans (black and rigid I think from memory), to a silicone sheet >> material that is a little more supple and more easily conforms to the >> shape of the upper cowl? >> I see that baffle material is availabe as follows: >> http://www.aeroinstock.com/products/Baffle-Seal/6211/0/product_cat/index.html >> >> http://www.skygeek.com/cs085x3x108g.html >> http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/appages/ams3320siliconebaffleseal.php >> >> Any further guidance would be appreciated please. >> Kind regards >> Pat >> * >> >> >> * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 2011
Subject: Re: RV-10 Fibreglass Plenum Vs Carbon Fibre
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Sounds almost as much fun as fitting the doors................... On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Robin Marks wrote: > Snip>> I can't even imagine removing my cowls 300+ times, ouch > > Spoken like a man who hasnt gotten to installing his cowl yet. J > > > Robin ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 2011
Subject: F-1044B fabrition
From: Shannon Hicks <civeng123(at)gmail.com>
Good morning all! I am working on page 31-2 and am having some trouble figuring out exactly what F-1044B is supposed to look like when I am done. Do any of you guys have a picture of this piece? That 149 deg bend has me scratching my head today! Shannon ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: F-1044B fabrition
From: Ronald Walker <n520tx(at)gmail.com>
Date: Jul 04, 2011
> Good morning all! > > I am working on page 31-2 and am having some trouble figuring out > exactly what F-1044B is supposed to look like when I am done. Do any > of you guys have a picture of this piece? That 149 deg bend has me > scratching my head today! > > Shannon > Attached - 2 pictures, first showing the piece as fabricated, the second shows it 'in place'. Hope it helps. --Ron ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 2011
Subject: Re: F-1044B fabrition
From: William Curtis <wcurtis(at)nerv10.com>
It is the aluminum angle you see to the right in the picture at the below link: http://wcurtis.nerv10.com/08Fuselage/fuselage31f.html The rivet up against the firewall angle is hard to get to and you may want to put a nut and bolt there instead. On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Shannon Hicks wrote: > Good morning all! > > I am working on page 31-2 and am having some trouble figuring out exactly > what F-1044B is supposed to look like when I am done. Do any of you guys > have a picture of this piece? That 149 deg bend has me scratching my head > today! > > Shannon > > -- > William > N40237 - http://wcurtis.nerv10.com/ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 2011
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: F-1044B fabrition
Brain freeze perhaps. I don't have a picture but I know the part. Try rewording Step 2 to read, "Fabricate part F-1044B from AA6-125 x 3/4 x 3/4 angle as shown in Figure 2". That unfreeze the blockage. Bill On 7/4/2011 11:09 AM, Shannon Hicks wrote: > > Good morning all! > > I am working on page 31-2 and am having some trouble figuring out > exactly what F-1044B is supposed to look like when I am done. Do any > of you guys have a picture of this piece? That 149 deg bend has me > scratching my head today! > > Shannon > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 2011
Subject: Re: F-1044B fabrition
From: Shannon Hicks <civeng123(at)gmail.com>
Thanks Ron. I was confused about the orientation of the bend. I wasn't sure if I was supposed to cut the flange or not. On Jul 4, 2011 12:07 PM, "Ronald Walker" wrote: >> Good morning all! >> >> I am working on page 31-2 and am having some trouble figuring out >> exactly what F-1044B is supposed to look like when I am done. Do any >> of you guys have a picture of this piece? That 149 deg bend has me >> scratching my head today! >> >> Shannon >> > > Attached - 2 pictures, first showing the piece as fabricated, the second > shows it 'in place'. > > Hope it helps. > > --Ron > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: 4th of July Musing
From: "AirMike" <Mikeabel(at)Pacbell.net>
Date: Jul 04, 2011
A day to be grateful. We US types should take a moment to thank our stars that we live in a country where we can still fly where we want when we want with relatively few restrictions. In only a handful of countries is General Aviation flying free of onerous restrictions. Interestingly, the US, Canada, and Australia are among those few countries that inherited a tradition of individual rights and freedom that is reflected in our traditions to fly where we want - when we want. This is no accident. The brave warrior aviators that flew in the skies over England, Germany, France, Korea, and even Vietnam were a part of preserving that tradition. We RV10 builders must continue to fight for that tradition and those rights through EAA and our local chapters and pilot groups. As the US Declaration of Independence says, "We are endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights." Let us preserve those rights and not let governments steal them from us. -------- See you OSH '11 Q/B - flying 1 yr+ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344886#344886 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: EGT probe?
From: "AirMike" <Mikeabel(at)Pacbell.net>
Date: Jul 04, 2011
Yea - swap it to another cylinder and check the connection. Probably going south on you. EGT's and CHT probes are a constant maintenance item. Burned 'em out about every 300 hrs on my Cessna. -------- See you OSH '11 Q/B - flying 1 yr+ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344899#344899 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Dave Saylor <dave.saylor.aircrafters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Jul 04, 2011
Subject: Re: RV-10 Fibreglass Plenum Vs Carbon Fibre
Shameless promotion: I really like the big oil door we developed. Go to our website if you're interested. I think it's pertinent to this discussion since it's just about as good as taking the top cowl off for inspection. Probably not a lot of maintenance is going to get done, but being able to preflight the entire top of the engine and behind the accessory case is comforting to me. Also, note how the rear baffle is canted forward at an angle. That really helps when putting the cowl on (or closing the door) since normally the seal kind of wants to stand up straight and interfere with the cowl. This way it just lays down nicely. And notice the nice orange line from the baffle on the inside of the door. That's pretty indicative of a good seal. No temp problems so far. Approaching 900 hours. Dave Saylor AirCrafters 140 Aviation Way Watsonville, CA 95076 831-722-9141 Shop 831-750-0284 Cell On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > > Sounds almost as much fun as fitting the doors................... > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Robin Marks wrote : >> Snip>> I can't even imagine removing my cowls 300+ times, ouch >> >> Spoken like a man who hasn=99t gotten to installing his cowl yet. J >> >> >> >> Robin > > =========== =========== RUMS - =========== ite - - =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2--Matt Dralle, List Admin. =========== > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DLM" <dlm34077(at)q.com>
Subject: Re: EGT probe?
Date: Jul 04, 2011
depends on the quality of the probe. The Electronics International probes have a life comparable to engine TBO. In 3000 hours of flight with Insight supplied (Alcor?) probes I replaced 1 or 2 in my C177RG. Before I switched to EI on the 10, I had four GRT failures in the first 300 hours. Check them before you swap them; you will see whether it is even necessary. ----- Original Message ----- From: "AirMike" <Mikeabel(at)Pacbell.net> Sent: Monday, July 04, 2011 12:49 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: EGT probe? > > Yea - swap it to another cylinder and check the connection. Probably going > south on you. EGT's and CHT probes are a constant maintenance item. Burned > 'em out about every 300 hrs on my Cessna. > > -------- > See you OSH '11 > Q/B - flying 1 yr+ > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344899#344899 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Date: Jul 04, 2011
Subject: Re: RV-10 Fibreglass Plenum Vs Carbon Fibre
A fellow builder used my hanger for about a week. He installed the "shameless promotion oil door". Looked nice and practical. I can see the benefit. Robin Sent from my iPad2. On Jul 4, 2011, at 1:03 PM, Dave Saylor wrote: > Shameless promotion: > > I really like the big oil door we developed. Go to our website if > you're interested. > > I think it's pertinent to this discussion since it's just about as > good as taking the top cowl off for inspection. Probably not a lot of > maintenance is going to get done, but being able to preflight the > entire top of the engine and behind the accessory case is comforting > to me. > > Also, note how the rear baffle is canted forward at an angle. That > really helps when putting the cowl on (or closing the door) since > normally the seal kind of wants to stand up straight and interfere > with the cowl. This way it just lays down nicely. And notice the > nice orange line from the baffle on the inside of the door. That's > pretty indicative of a good seal. > > No temp problems so far. Approaching 900 hours. > > Dave Saylor > AirCrafters > 140 Aviation Way > Watsonville, CA 95076 > 831-722-9141 Shop > 831-750-0284 Cell > > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Kelly McMullen wrote: >> >> Sounds almost as much fun as fitting the doors................... >> >> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Robin Marks wrote: >>> Snip>> I can't even imagine removing my cowls 300+ times, ouch >>> >>> Spoken like a man who hasnt gotten to installing his cowl yet. J >>> >>> >>> >>> Robin >> >> > =========== > =========== > RUMS - > =========== > ite - > -Matt Dralle, List Admin. > =========== >> >> >> >> >> > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: John Gonzalez <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com>
Subject: Greg Hale is in Sport Aviation this month
Date: Jul 04, 2011
Way to go Dick! Think of all the people who have wanted to put a mustache on the Mona Lisa! Don't mess with DaVinci=2C Don't mess with Dick's creation. Thanks William for posting this. Date: Sun=2C 3 Jul 2011 21:57:49 -0400 Subject: RV10-List: Greg Hale is in Sport Aviation this month From: wcurtis(at)nerv10.com I don't do Facebook and so have previously ignored the Facebook icon on the Van's homepage. I decided to take a look at what was out there and I see Van's has a pretty pointed commentary on Greg's aircraft. The title of the article is "WHAT PRICE MASTERPIECE?" http://www.facebook.com/notes/vans-aircraft-inc/what-price-masterpiece-by-d ick-vangrunsven/237594966250883 The article touches on a number of items=2C increased gross weight=2C seats =2C shoulder harness and additional fuel tanks in the wings. The additiona l fuel in the wings is relevant to Matronics thread 75832. -- William N40237 - http://wcurtis.nerv10.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 2011
From: Patrick Pulis <rv10free2fly(at)yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Re: RV-10 Fibreglass Plenum Vs Carbon Fibre
Yeah, yeah, mate, us slow pokes will eventually get there.=C2- Just remem ber the story about the tortoise and the hair!=0A=C2-=0AIt will be finish ed when its finished.=0A=0AFrom: Robin Marks <robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>=0ATo: rv10-list(at)matronics.com=0ASent: Monday, 4 July 2011 5:43 PM=0ASubject: RE: RV10-List: RV-10 Fibreglass Plenum Vs Carbon Fibre=0A=0A=0ASnip>>I can't ev en imagine removing my cowls 300+ times, ouch=0ASpoken like a man who hasn =99t gotten to installing his cowl yet. J=0A=C2-=0ARobin=0ADo Not A rchive=0A=C2-=0AFrom:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-r v10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Patrick Pulis=0ASent: Sunday, J uly 03, 2011 9:58 PM=0ATo: rv10-list(at)matronics.com=0ASubject: RV10-List: RV -10 Fibreglass Plenum Vs Carbon Fibre=0A=C2-=0AMany thanks to all who res ponded to my enquiry, its really appreciated.=C2- I really like you guys because of your openness, honesty and best of all your experience.=C2- I can't even imagine removing my cowls 300+ times, ouch.=0A=C2-=0AIs it wor thwhile upgrading the rubber baffle seal material as supplied by Vans (blac k and rigid I think from memory), to a silicone sheet material that is a li ttle more supple and more easily conforms to the shape of the upper cowl? =0A=C2-=0AI see that baffle material is availabe as follows:=0A=C2-=0Ah ttp://www.aeroinstock.com/products/Baffle-Seal/6211/0/product_cat/index.htm l=0A=C2-=0Ahttp://www.skygeek.com/cs085x3x108g.html=0A=C2-=0Ahttp://www .aircraftspruce.com/catalog/appages/ams3320siliconebaffleseal.php=0A=C2- =0AAny further guidance would be appreciated please.=0A=C2-=0AKind regard s=0A=C2-=0APat=0A=C2-=0A=C2-=0Aw.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">h ttp://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV1=0Ahttp://www.matronics.com/contributi on========================0A =C2-======================= ==== ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 04, 2011
Subject: Re: EGT probe?
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
I doubt it. EI specifies 1.5" from flange for their probes. I've had no problems with them installed there. On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Linn Walters wrote: > I wonder if mounting them further from the flange might increase their > longevity??? > Linn > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 2011
From: Tim Lewis <TimRVator(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Fisher House RV-10
Cool! I noticed the ridge aft of the door on the cabin. Did you put a parachute recovery system on the plane? If so, I'd love to hear about it. Tim -- Tim Lewis -- HEF (Manassas, VA) RV-6A N47TD -- 1104 hrs - sold RV-10 N31TD -- 160 hrs Dawson-Townsend,Timothy said the following on 6/28/2011 11:38 PM: > > Paint is finally complete! > > Somewhere during the (long) building process, we decided to give N52KS > a little side mission to promote the Fisher House Foundation with the > airplane. For those not familiar, the Fisher House Foundation > constructs the Fisher Houses, which are a place to stay for family > members while a loved one is undergoing treatment at a neighboring > military hospital or VA medical center. > > Paint is by Prestige Aircraft in Swanton, VT. > > Look for us at Oshkosh, parked with the other Airventure Cup racers. > (anyone else racing?) > > Cheers, > > Tim Dawson-Townsend > N52KS #40025 > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Cylinder front baffle question
From: Michael Kraus <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net>
Date: Jul 05, 2011
Just curious what the size is of everyones front cylinder baffles, the little ones on the front of the cylinders to block airflow to the #1 and #2 cylinders? Stock size is about 2.5". Is anyone flying with them totally removed? Just curious what the different sizes are out there... -Mike Kraus Sent from my iPhone ________________________________________________________________________________
From: David <dmaib(at)mac.com>
Subject: Re: Cylinder front baffle question
Date: Jul 05, 2011
Mine are totally removed with my current inlet setup. Mine is a bit different than most due to the AC compressor installation that affects the LH inlet. Prior to this setup, I flew with the RH cut down about 50%. I believe there are many flying with partial or no front baffles. My hangar neighbor took both of his out to solve cooling issues on a stock setup. David Maib 40559 flying On Jul 5, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Michael Kraus wrote: > > > Just curious what the size is of everyones front cylinder baffles, > the little ones on the front of the cylinders to block airflow to > the #1 and #2 cylinders? Stock size is about 2.5". > > Is anyone flying with them totally removed? > > Just curious what the different sizes are out there... > -Mike Kraus > > Sent from my iPhone > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Cylinder front baffle question
From: Kevin Belue <kdbelue(at)charter.net>
Date: Jul 05, 2011
I never installed mine. CHT are all within 30. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 5, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Michael Kraus wrote: > > Just curious what the size is of everyones front cylinder baffles, the little ones on the front of the cylinders to block airflow to the #1 and #2 cylinders? Stock size is about 2.5". > > Is anyone flying with them totally removed? > > Just curious what the different sizes are out there... > -Mike Kraus > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 2011
From: Patrick Thyssen <jump2(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Minimum disatance for multiple GPS antenna placement?
Garmin also states to avoid mounting antenna closer than 3 inches from the windscreen to avoid degradation and to maintain a constant gain pattern. From 430W manual. So who ever put it under a plexi glass and right next to each other, if you have trouble that might be the reason. Patrick Thyssen N15PT ________________________________ From: Seano <sean(at)braunandco.com> Sent: Sun, July 3, 2011 1:59:00 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Minimum disatance for multiple GPS antenna placement? Garmin states min edge distance as 6" and offset from each other. That's from the g3x manual for distance between the g3x gps/XM and another gps antenna such as the 430w. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 3, 2011, at 14:19, "jayb" wrote: > > Does anyone know if there's a min distance requirement for placing GPS >Antennas? One for GNS430W and the other for Navworx ADS-B GPS... I have the >GNS430W GPS Ant mounted just aft of the cabin top. > > Thanks, > Jay > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344803#344803 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Cylinder front baffle question
From: "Strasnuts" <sean(at)braunandco.com>
Date: Jul 05, 2011
I cut mine exactly in half before I flew. Now my #5 cylinder is the hottest CHT. My #1 is fairly cool. Now I wish I had a little extra material on the front of #1 to even them out. I powder coated mine so I wanted the final size before I installed them. My #5 is still way under the limits and I still haven't taken the time to really seal the baffles. -------- 40936 RV-10 SB N801VR Flying Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344979#344979 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 2011
From: Bruce Johnson <bruce1hwjohnson(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Cylinder front baffle question
HI Michael, I took mine out after running them for-20 hrs. It reduced my temps about 20 degrees. Now instead of # 2 being the warmest # 6 is by abou t 25 degrees.-=0A=0A=0AFrom: Michael Kraus <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net> =0ATo: rv10-list(at)matronics.com=0ASent: Tuesday, July 5, 2011 8:38 AM=0ASubj ect: RV10-List: Cylinder front baffle question=0A=0A--> RV10-List message p osted by: Michael Kraus =0A=0AJust curious what the size is of everyones front cylinder baffles, the little ones on the fr ont of the cylinders to block airflow to the #1 and #2 cylinders?- Stock size is about 2.5".=0A=0AIs anyone flying with them totally removed?- =0A =0AJust curious what the different sizes are out there...=0A-Mike Kraus=0A ==================== ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Cylinder front baffle question
From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu>
Date: Jul 05, 2011
Note: I'm still in phase 1. My front cylinders were hotter than the others. I cut 1/2" off each air dam. #1 was still hottest, so I removed the air dam there. Result is that now #5 cht is hotter than #1. #2 is still slightly hotter than others on the left side. Now, I think: I need to cut another 1/2" off the #2 air dam, and put the #1 back on but with most of the material removed. -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344990#344990 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Leffler" <rv(at)thelefflers.com>
Subject: Re: Cylinder front baffle question
Date: Jul 05, 2011
That's my current "opportunity". I want to powder coat too, but the decision is if I powder coat them now, then I may have to deal with cooling issues later, or powder coat after the baffles are "tweaked", but then can I get the baffles clean enough to powder coat later? Bob -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Strasnuts Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 12:37 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Cylinder front baffle question I cut mine exactly in half before I flew. Now my #5 cylinder is the hottest CHT. My #1 is fairly cool. Now I wish I had a little extra material on the front of #1 to even them out. I powder coated mine so I wanted the final size before I installed them. My #5 is still way under the limits and I still haven't taken the time to really seal the baffles. -------- 40936 RV-10 SB N801VR Flying Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344979#344979 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 2011
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Cylinder front baffle question
We are only talking some pieces of flat 2024 with one right angle, correct? Why not make some identical trial pieces to get size right, then take the final pieces, adjust size and powder coat? They will just have 2-3 rivets holding them that won't be powder coated. Not sure it makes sense to try and finalize all the baffling and then powder coat as one unit. On 7/5/2011 12:27 PM, Bob Leffler wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: "Bob Leffler" > > That's my current "opportunity". I want to powder coat too, but the > decision is if I powder coat them now, then I may have to deal with cooling > issues later, or powder coat after the baffles are "tweaked", but then can I > get the baffles clean enough to powder coat later? > > Bob > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Strasnuts > Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 12:37 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Re: Cylinder front baffle question > > --> RV10-List message posted by: "Strasnuts" > > I cut mine exactly in half before I flew. Now my #5 cylinder is the hottest > CHT. My #1 is fairly cool. Now I wish I had a little extra material on the > front of #1 to even them out. I powder coated mine so I wanted the final > size before I installed them. My #5 is still way under the limits and I > still haven't taken the time to really seal the baffles. > > -------- > 40936 > RV-10 SB N801VR Flying > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344979#344979 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Seano" <sean(at)braunandco.com>
Subject: Re: Cylinder front baffle question
Date: Jul 05, 2011
so Bob, I know they are all different but if I was to do it over on mine, I would leave 3/4 on the 1,3,5 side and half on the 2,4,6 side. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Leffler" <rv(at)thelefflers.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 1:27 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Cylinder front baffle question > > That's my current "opportunity". I want to powder coat too, but the > decision is if I powder coat them now, then I may have to deal with > cooling > issues later, or powder coat after the baffles are "tweaked", but then can > I > get the baffles clean enough to powder coat later? > > Bob > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Strasnuts > Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 12:37 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Re: Cylinder front baffle question > > > I cut mine exactly in half before I flew. Now my #5 cylinder is the > hottest > CHT. My #1 is fairly cool. Now I wish I had a little extra material on > the > front of #1 to even them out. I powder coated mine so I wanted the final > size before I installed them. My #5 is still way under the limits and I > still haven't taken the time to really seal the baffles. > > -------- > 40936 > RV-10 SB N801VR Flying > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344979#344979 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 2011
Subject: Re: Cylinder front baffle question
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
If your rear cylinders are hotter than front you need some of the baffles. That is their purpose, to even up the cooling between front and rear. Finding the right size to minimize differences is part of your initial flight testing. On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote: > HI Michael, I took mine out after running them for20 hrs. It reduced my > temps about 20 degrees. Now instead of # 2 being the warmest # 6 is by about > 25 degrees. > > From: Michael Kraus <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net> > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2011 8:38 AM > Subject: RV10-List: Cylinder front baffle question > > > Just curious what the size is of everyones front cylinder baffles, the > little ones on the front of the cylinders to block airflow to the #1 and #2 > cylinders? Stock size is about 2.5". > > Is anyone flying with them totally removed? > > Just curious what the different sizes are out there. --> nbsp; > ====================== > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Seano" <sean(at)braunandco.com>
Subject: Re: Cylinder front baffle question
Date: Jul 05, 2011
I like it. Maybe have a bunch powdercoated and use little bolts on the front and trade them out until it is right. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kelly McMullen" <kellym(at)aviating.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 1:52 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Cylinder front baffle question > > We are only talking some pieces of flat 2024 with one right angle, > correct? Why not make some identical trial pieces to get size right, then > take the final pieces, adjust size and powder coat? They will just have > 2-3 rivets holding them that won't be powder coated. Not sure it makes > sense to try and finalize all the baffling and then powder coat as one > unit. > > > On 7/5/2011 12:27 PM, Bob Leffler wrote: >> --> RV10-List message posted by: "Bob Leffler" >> >> That's my current "opportunity". I want to powder coat too, but the >> decision is if I powder coat them now, then I may have to deal with >> cooling >> issues later, or powder coat after the baffles are "tweaked", but then >> can I >> get the baffles clean enough to powder coat later? >> >> Bob >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Strasnuts >> Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 12:37 PM >> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >> Subject: RV10-List: Re: Cylinder front baffle question >> >> --> RV10-List message posted by: "Strasnuts" >> >> I cut mine exactly in half before I flew. Now my #5 cylinder is the >> hottest >> CHT. My #1 is fairly cool. Now I wish I had a little extra material on >> the >> front of #1 to even them out. I powder coated mine so I wanted the final >> size before I installed them. My #5 is still way under the limits and I >> still haven't taken the time to really seal the baffles. >> >> -------- >> 40936 >> RV-10 SB N801VR Flying >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344979#344979 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rene Felker" <rene(at)felker.com>
Subject: Re: Cylinder front baffle question
Date: Jul 05, 2011
Just to throw a little gas on this fire. I did cut my baffles down a little, but was concerned with the other end of spectrum...shock cooling. My temps were real high over the first XX hours, but got better as the engine was broken in. I wish my cooling was better, but have not seen anything that would be worth trying....at least not beyond what I have already done. I just came out of ABQ yesterday and my oil temp got up to 225 and a couple of cylinders were at 410. I just slowed down my climb to get the temperatures in line and pressed on to my initial cruising altitude of 14500. I get many more shock cooling alarms then I do over temp......so I have decided to stick with what I got for right now. I may try to close up the gap in the lower cowl in front of the front gear leg, but that would only be if I open up the slot more to allow the lower cowl to be R&R'd easier. Rene' Felker N423CF 801-721-6080 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Seano Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 2:00 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Cylinder front baffle question so Bob, I know they are all different but if I was to do it over on mine, I would leave 3/4 on the 1,3,5 side and half on the 2,4,6 side. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Leffler" <rv(at)thelefflers.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 1:27 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Cylinder front baffle question > > That's my current "opportunity". I want to powder coat too, but the > decision is if I powder coat them now, then I may have to deal with > cooling > issues later, or powder coat after the baffles are "tweaked", but then can > I > get the baffles clean enough to powder coat later? > > Bob > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Strasnuts > Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 12:37 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Re: Cylinder front baffle question > > > I cut mine exactly in half before I flew. Now my #5 cylinder is the > hottest > CHT. My #1 is fairly cool. Now I wish I had a little extra material on > the > front of #1 to even them out. I powder coated mine so I wanted the final > size before I installed them. My #5 is still way under the limits and I > still haven't taken the time to really seal the baffles. > > -------- > 40936 > RV-10 SB N801VR Flying > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=344979#344979 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Cylinder front baffle question
From: Michael Kraus <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net>
Date: Jul 05, 2011
Thanks Kelly, I am aware of how they work, but that wasn't my question. I am working on balancing mine now. Mine seem best with them removed. 1 and 2 were my hottest, followed by #5 and #6. I'm just curious with what others are seeing and if others have them totally removed. It appears that lots of people do have them removed. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 5, 2011, at 3:59 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > > If your rear cylinders are hotter than front you need some of the > baffles. That is their purpose, to even up the cooling between front > and rear. Finding the right size to minimize differences is part of > your initial flight testing. > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Bruce Johnson > wrote: >> HI Michael, I took mine out after running them for 20 hrs. It reduced my >> temps about 20 degrees. Now instead of # 2 being the warmest # 6 is by about >> 25 degrees. >> >> From: Michael Kraus <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net> >> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >> Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2011 8:38 AM >> Subject: RV10-List: Cylinder front baffle question >> >> >> Just curious what the size is of everyones front cylinder baffles, the >> little ones on the front of the cylinders to block airflow to the #1 and #2 >> cylinders? Stock size is about 2.5". >> >> Is anyone flying with them totally removed? >> >> Just curious what the different sizes are out there. --> nbsp; >> ====================== >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rene Felker" <rene(at)felker.com>
Subject: Alternator
Date: Jul 05, 2011
Lost my alternator yesterday coming back from ABQ. I was about 150 NM (as the crow flies) from Ogden (OGD). I have an 8 amp standby alternator and it worked great. I turned off the FM radio, but left everything else running (no lights) and the alternator kept up (between 1 and 2 amp drain) as long as I was running cruse RPM. As I slowed down, the drain was higher. So, this is the first "real" test of my standby alternator. Here is my basic set up.... A battery in the standard location (925) with its own contactor A battery on the firewall (680) with its own contactor Vans 60 amp alternator in the standard position B&C 8 amp alternator on the vacuum pump pad I have one three way switch for the main battery and Alternator (off - Battery - Battery/Alternator) I have one three way switch for the backup battery and Alternator (off - Battery - Battery/Alternator) The only part I don't like about my system......I put the amp meter sensor on the line going to the main battery. That means I do not really know what is happening to the backup battery....from a charge/discharge point of view. So, once the main Alternator failed...I decided to isolate the main battery and run off the standby battery only, losing my charge/discharge reading. I brought the main battery back on line when I contact Ogden tower for landing...... FYI I have the old style Alternator Vans sold in the past, not the Plane Power one they sell today. Rene' Felker N423CF 801-721-6080 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dawson-Townsend,Timothy" <tdawson-townsend(at)aurora.aero>
Subject: Paint and chute
Date: Jul 05, 2011
A couple of folks asked about the unique ridge running down the side of our RV-10, and yes, that is a fairing over one of the riser cables for the bal listic parachute. Stop by at Oshkosh and check it out if you'd like. For us, it added about $10,000, 100 pounds, and a year to the project! But it was a fun engineering challenge! Tim N52KS ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Greg Hale is in Sport Aviation this month
From: "AirMike" <Mikeabel(at)Pacbell.net>
Date: Jul 05, 2011
While I am loathe to criticize Greg Hale, I appreciate the pointed comments of Van. In my humble opinion, the Vans planes are designed to be light, efficient, good load carriers. I built mine with that idea in mind , and at 1620 lbs. (including tow bar), I have 780 lbs. Of payload with full tanks. The factory seats are awesome, and the idea of making almost any modification to this design is, in my opinion, a poor decision. I have only 3 modifications to the original design - S/S air box , inspection panels to under flooring, and Bonaco fuel lines. Each mod adds weight even these modest changes probably added 1-2 lbs. and added man-hours to the build. I think that if you buy into the Vans concept, you will build quicker, have less challenges, and get more satisfaction out of your RV-10. Vans put a lot of engineering into the 10. Why re-invent the wheel. -------- See you OSH '11 Q/B - flying 1 yr+ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345039#345039 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 2011
Subject: Re: Cylinder front baffle question
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
You must have a tight cooling limit set on your system(maybe 20 or 30 degrees). There is no way you are going to "shock cool" a naturally aspirated engine with air cooling. If it were possible, engines flying through rain or operating in the arctic would be breaking all over the place. When you pull power, even from 410 degrees, the engine is only going to cool to 270, maybe 250 over 3-5 minutes. It heats a whole lot faster, in 10-20 seconds when you apply full power for take off. That is the quickest any temperature change is going to happen. I'd suggest changing your alarm to 50 degrees. It will be very rare for that to go off. Shock cooling in the context of naturally aspirated engines is simply an old wives tale. On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Rene Felker wrote: > > Just to throw a little gas on this fire. I did cut my baffles down a > little, but was concerned with the other end of spectrum...shock cooling. > My temps were real high over the first XX hours, but got better as the > engine was broken in. I wish my cooling was better, but have not seen > anything that would be worth trying....at least not beyond what I have > already done. I just came out of ABQ yesterday and my oil temp got up to > 225 and a couple of cylinders were at 410. I just slowed down my climb to > get the temperatures in line and pressed on to my initial cruising altitude > of 14500. > > I get many more shock cooling alarms then I do over temp......so I have > decided to stick with what I got for right now. I may try to close up the > gap in the lower cowl in front of the front gear leg, but that would only be > if I open up the slot more to allow the lower cowl to be R&R'd easier. > > Rene' Felker > N423CF > 801-721-6080 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 2011
Subject: Re: Greg Hale is in Sport Aviation this month
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Well, since you asked, about re-inventing the wheel, there is no way I would install the stock Van's nose wheel setup. I bought the full Matco setup, axle, spacers and proper wheel. It took me longer to read and absorb the instructions than it did for me to put it together. It is likely to be very low maintenance compared to the factory torque, shimmy, torque, find nose fork galled and try to figure a fix. Also would not consider flying with Van's door latches without modification. Sean's latch is a far better design than the factory weak attempt. No question mods add to the build time and take very careful consideration. On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:21 PM, AirMike wrote: > I think that if you buy into the Vans concept, you will build quicker, have less challenges, and get more satisfaction out of your RV-10. Vans put a lot of engineering into the 10. Why re-invent the wheel. > > -------- > See you OSH '11 > Q/B - flying 1 yr+ > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345039#345039 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Cylinder front baffle question
From: David Leikam <daveleikam(at)wi.rr.com>
Date: Jul 05, 2011
Totally removed them. Good temps. David Leikam RV10 Flying On Jul 5, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Michael Kraus wrote: > > Just curious what the size is of everyones front cylinder baffles, the little ones on the front of the cylinders to block airflow to the #1 and #2 cylinders? Stock size is about 2.5". > > Is anyone flying with them totally removed? > > Just curious what the different sizes are out there... > -Mike Kraus > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 2011
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Cylinder front baffle question
One other idea Bob. Don't install baffles for phase one. Experiment with aluminum tape pasted on the front cylinders. When you get it right, trim baffles to match, powder coat and install. On 7/5/2011 12:27 PM, Bob Leffler wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: "Bob Leffler" > > That's my current "opportunity". I want to powder coat too, but the > decision is if I powder coat them now, then I may have to deal with cooling > issues later, or powder coat after the baffles are "tweaked", but then can I > get the baffles clean enough to powder coat later? > > Bob > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rene" <rene(at)felker.com>
Subject: Re: Cylinder front baffle question
Date: Jul 05, 2011
I will look at that again, but I think it is set to 50 degrees a minute. If I remember right , it is a rate setting in the GRT system. I will check that tomorrow when I am at the hanger. Rene' 801-721-6080 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kelly McMullen Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 8:58 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Cylinder front baffle question You must have a tight cooling limit set on your system(maybe 20 or 30 degrees). There is no way you are going to "shock cool" a naturally aspirated engine with air cooling. If it were possible, engines flying through rain or operating in the arctic would be breaking all over the place. When you pull power, even from 410 degrees, the engine is only going to cool to 270, maybe 250 over 3-5 minutes. It heats a whole lot faster, in 10-20 seconds when you apply full power for take off. That is the quickest any temperature change is going to happen. I'd suggest changing your alarm to 50 degrees. It will be very rare for that to go off. Shock cooling in the context of naturally aspirated engines is simply an old wives tale. On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Rene Felker wrote: > > Just to throw a little gas on this fire. I did cut my baffles down a > little, but was concerned with the other end of spectrum...shock cooling. > My temps were real high over the first XX hours, but got better as the > engine was broken in. I wish my cooling was better, but have not seen > anything that would be worth trying....at least not beyond what I have > already done. I just came out of ABQ yesterday and my oil temp got up > to > 225 and a couple of cylinders were at 410. I just slowed down my > climb to get the temperatures in line and pressed on to my initial > cruising altitude of 14500. > > I get many more shock cooling alarms then I do over temp......so I > have decided to stick with what I got for right now. I may try to > close up the gap in the lower cowl in front of the front gear leg, but > that would only be if I open up the slot more to allow the lower cowl to be R&R'd easier. > > Rene' Felker > N423CF > 801-721-6080 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Greg Hale is in Sport Aviation this month
From: "greghale" <ghale5224(at)aol.com>
Date: Jul 05, 2011
Guys I understand where Van's coming from, but the whole idea of building my own airplane is to be able to personalize the airplane the way I want it. I have posted a '"My thoughts and explanations" on my web site to show my point of view. My gross weight is 2700#. http://www.nwacaptain.com/my_thoughts.pdf Greg... -------- Greg Hale rv10 -- N210KH www.nwacaptain.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345069#345069 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Desert sandstorm PHX area
From: "woxofswa" <woxof(at)aol.com>
Date: Jul 05, 2011
-------- Myron Nelson Mesa, AZ Emp completed, QB wings completed, legacy build fuse in mostly done, finishing kit in progress. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345071#345071 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Desert sandstorm PHX area
From: "woxofswa" <woxof(at)aol.com>
Date: Jul 05, 2011
These were from my backyard this evening. We were relaxing in the pool when my wife said "hey look at that". 10 mins later the vis was about ten feet. -------- Myron Nelson Mesa, AZ Emp completed, QB wings completed, legacy build fuse in mostly done, finishing kit in progress. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345072#345072 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 05, 2011
Subject: Re: Desert sandstorm PHX area
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Yup, went on for over an hour in Sun Lakes, deposited about 1/8" of fresh soil on the patio. Vis was definitely less than 100 ft most of the time with a few periods down around 10-20 ft. Not looking forward to cleaning hangar in the morning with whatever blew through the poor seals and deposited on the project. On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:32 PM, woxofswa wrote: > > These were from my backyard this evening. We were relaxing in the pool when my wife said "hey look at that". 10 mins later the vis was about ten feet. > > > -------- > Myron Nelson > Mesa, AZ > Emp completed, QB wings completed, legacy build fuse in mostly done, finishing kit in progress. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345072#345072 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne Edgerton" <w.edgerton(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Greg Hale is in Sport Aviation this month
Date: Jul 06, 2011
Number one I think Greg's plane looks really great. Mine is also quite heavy, 1750, and my rationale was the same as Greg's, I built it the way I wanted it and I said the weight will have to be what it will be. I also usually only fly alone or with one other person. On occasion I'll take folks up for a ride and fill the plane. I have a hangar mate who's a retired Air Force Col, former B52 pilot, and during his military flying years they concluded that carrying excess fuel was inefficient in many ways. He's now converted me, somewhat, to that idea and I usually only maintain 30 to 40 gals of fuel on board, thus reducing my weight up to 170 to 200 lbs. If I go cross country, depending on the distance, then I fill it up. But going cross country for me usually doesn't include a full load of passengers. Several years back I flew up through Alaska and stopped in at Van's for a tour of their factory. I found the tour very interesting. While I was on the ramp Van came out to talk. I told him right away that I know his mission and my mission with the plane is different. I told him I built it the way I wanted it and the weight is what it is. He said he understood but that he looks at everything as an engineer and to him weight is speed and other efficiencies that come with a lighter weight. We talked for about 30 minutes or more and he is an enjoyable person to talk to. He never made me feel I shouldn't have built it the way I did. He's a very interesting guy. Anyway I guess what I'm saying is that I'm with Greg. Your building a plane for your use so make it the way you want it as long as the changes you're making isn't outside the norm of tested things, i.e. items that haven't been completely tested, remember Dan Lloyd. Much of the weight on mine came from full interior, built in O2, and a few other avionic items. I've not yet experienced a problem with my plane weighing a little more than Van's and I also used the recommended gross weight of 2700 lbs. I really haven't seen that much loss of speed when compared to others. Wayne Edgerton N602WT Subject: Re: Greg Hale is in Sport Aviation this month From: "greghale" <ghale5224(at)aol.com> Guys I understand where Van's coming from, but the whole idea of building my own airplane is to be able to personalize the airplane the way I want it. I have posted a '"My thoughts and explanations" on my web site to show my point of view. My gross weight is 2700#. http://www.nwacaptain.com/my_thoughts.pdf Greg... -------- Greg Hale rv10 -- N210KH www.nwacaptain.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345069#345069 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "E & T Andrews" <etandrews(at)westnet.com.au>
Subject: External Brake Lines - crack
Date: Jul 07, 2011
Everyone, I have found a fatigue crack in one of my external brake lines just outside the fuselage where the aluminium tube curves back to the gear leg. I noticed my brake fluid down on the left hand side after my flight and then went to investigate. On my previous flight, I had inspected the wheel region and pumped up the tires and no leak was evident... so the final failure must have occurred on my last flight. I am now planning to replace the solid aluminium tube with flexible hoses as per Tim=99s web page. For the last 18 months I have operated out of a grass airfield that I expect has contributed to the extra movement in the gear during taxi and landing etc. Has anyone found any issues with use of flexible brake hoses and if so what hose type did you use? Evan Andrews RV10 150hrs Flying ====== Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.17870) http://www.pctools.com/ ====== ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "gary" <speckter(at)comcast.net>
Subject: External Brake Lines - crack
Date: Jul 06, 2011
I too fly on grass and had the same issue as you. I replaced them with Bonaco. They have the lengths you need, you don't even have to measure. Gary Specketer _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of E & T Andrews Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 5:47 PM Subject: RV10-List: External Brake Lines - crack Everyone, I have found a fatigue crack in one of my external brake lines just outside the fuselage where the aluminium tube curves back to the gear leg. I noticed my brake fluid down on the left hand side after my flight and then went to investigate. On my previous flight, I had inspected the wheel region and pumped up the tires and no leak was evident... so the final failure must have occurred on my last flight. I am now planning to replace the solid aluminium tube with flexible hoses as per Tim's web page. For the last 18 months I have operated out of a grass airfield that I expect has contributed to the extra movement in the gear during taxi and landing etc. Has anyone found any issues with use of flexible brake hoses and if so what hose type did you use? Evan Andrews RV10 150hrs Flying ====== Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.17870) http://www.pctools.com ======= ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bill Schlatterer" <billschlatterer(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: External Brake Lines - crack
Date: Jul 06, 2011
Bonoco will have the lines ready made for your make and model. Super quality with abrasion sleeving over braid. Using them on my 7 and love them. 50 hours and no apparent wear at all. Bill S 7a _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of E & T Andrews Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 5:47 PM Subject: RV10-List: External Brake Lines - crack Everyone, I have found a fatigue crack in one of my external brake lines just outside the fuselage where the aluminium tube curves back to the gear leg. I noticed my brake fluid down on the left hand side after my flight and then went to investigate. On my previous flight, I had inspected the wheel region and pumped up the tires and no leak was evident... so the final failure must have occurred on my last flight. I am now planning to replace the solid aluminium tube with flexible hoses as per Tim's web page. For the last 18 months I have operated out of a grass airfield that I expect has contributed to the extra movement in the gear during taxi and landing etc. Has anyone found any issues with use of flexible brake hoses and if so what hose type did you use? Evan Andrews RV10 150hrs Flying ====== Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.17870) http://www.pctools.com ======= ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 06, 2011
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Desert sandstorm PHX area
So is this the outflow from a big storm? Looks like the ones I've seen in TX and NM back in my glider days... at first I turned and ran but realized other racers were riding them.... nothing like it! No fun on the ground though, especially for a big city. Bill "working the punch list" Watson On 7/6/2011 10:10 AM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > For the benefit of those that don't know what we are discussing, and > what you *really* don't want to fly into, here is photo from front > page of today's Arizona Republic. > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 06, 2011
Subject: Re: Desert sandstorm PHX area
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Usually it is the leading edge of a big storm, yes, outflow. Storms often roll in off the mountains down from 7000 ft to 1000 ft elevation, so a lot of energy is incorporated. Yesterday's storm had 50-70mph winds for over an hour, and that picks up a lot of dirt from the desert. On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Bill Watson wrote: > > So is this the outflow from a big storm? > > Looks like the ones I've seen in TX and NM back in my glider days... at > first I turned and ran but realized other racers were riding them.... > nothing like it! No fun on the ground though, especially for a big city. > > Bill "working the punch list" Watson > > On 7/6/2011 10:10 AM, Kelly McMullen wrote: >> >> For the benefit of those that don't know what we are discussing, and >> what you *really* don't want to fly into, here is photo from front >> page of today's Arizona Republic. >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: External Brake Lines - crack
From: "rv10flyer" <wayne.gillispie(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jul 07, 2011
Bonaco on mine. -------- Wayne Gillispie, A&P 5/93, PPC 10/08 Bldr# 40983 SB Started 12/1/09. Fuselage Sec 46 Eng mount/Gear- 1359 hrs to date. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345243#345243 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Roger Standley" <taildragon(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: External Brake Lines - crack
Date: Jul 07, 2011
Tim, I was looking at your website and noticed that your original brake line installation went directly to the caliper. Did that work OK? Why did you loop around the axle on your Bonaco line install? Roger 40291 ----- Original Message ----- From: Bill Schlatterer<mailto:billschlatterer(at)sbcglobal.net> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 5:01 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: External Brake Lines - crack Bonoco will have the lines ready made for your make and model. Super quality with abrasion sleeving over braid. Using them on my 7 and love them. 50 hours and no apparent wear at all. Bill S 7a ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of E & T Andrews Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 5:47 PM To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Subject: RV10-List: External Brake Lines - crack Everyone, I have found a fatigue crack in one of my external brake lines just outside the fuselage where the aluminium tube curves back to the gear leg. I noticed my brake fluid down on the left hand side after my flight and then went to investigate. On my previous flight, I had inspected the wheel region and pumped up the tires and no leak was evident... so the final failure must have occurred on my last flight. I am now planning to replace the solid aluminium tube with flexible hoses as per Tim's web page. For the last 18 months I have operated out of a grass airfield that I expect has contributed to the extra movement in the gear during taxi and landing etc. Has anyone found any issues with use of flexible brake hoses and if so what hose type did you use? Evan Andrews RV10 150hrs Flying ====== Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.17870) http://www.pctools.com 51> ======= href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronic s.com/Navigator?RV10-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List igator?RV10-List> http://www.matronics.com/contribution on> ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: External Brake Lines - crack
From: "rv10flyer" <wayne.gillispie(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jul 07, 2011
31 1/2" -3 hose with -4 straight fittings on each end. Like Tim said they know exactly what you need. Everything fit fine on mine. The two hoses from copilot master cylinders to reservoir tee fitting were 1" too long but they still worked. +1 for 5052-O fuel/brake lines. Van's 3003-O is going to be hauled off for scrap this winter after flying. 5052-O would have broken too...it just takes twice as long. Back to wheel pants...oh I love fiberglass. At least the end is near as my pile of parts is getting real small. Ted Chang's BIG West trip on VAF has really got me motivated now. Looking forward to some cool fall test flying. -------- Wayne Gillispie, A&P 5/93, PPC 10/08 Bldr# 40983 SB Started 12/1/09. Fuselage Sec 46 Eng mount/Gear- 1359 hrs to date. Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345325#345325 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 07, 2011
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Inspiration - Ultimate Air-To-Air Shot...
Fellow RVers, If you feeling like you needed a little inspiration on that RV project, check out the attached photo. What an awesome shot of a P-51 Mustang leading a flight of 7 RVs!! Totally cool! Makes me wish my RV-8 was rebuilt. But then, what doesn't... ;-) Matt - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 170+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 2011
From: "Fred Williams, M.D." <drfred(at)suddenlinkmail.com>
Subject: Re: Inspiration - Ultimate Air-To-Air Shot...
That will make the desktop back round for a while. Dr Fred See you all at Oshkosh. Should be there Sunday through Tuesday. If anybody wants to team up on Sunday morning from Southern Kansas around Wichita let me know. I have to be at a wedding in Winfield on Saturday. On 7/7/2011 9:58 PM, Matt Dralle wrote: > Fellow RVers, > > If you feeling like you needed a little inspiration on that RV project, check out the attached photo. What an awesome shot of a P-51 Mustang leading a flight of 7 RVs!! Totally cool! Makes me wish my RV-8 was rebuilt. But then, what doesn't... ;-) > > Matt > > > - > Matt Dralle > RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" > http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log > http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log > http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel > Status: 170+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Pascal" <rv10flyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: New option for nose wheel
Date: Jul 08, 2011
For anyone who did not see this in VAF =97=8F BERINGER Introduces Nosewheel Solution for Van=99s RV-10 Tallard, France: BERINGER Wheels & Brakes=C2=AE, the high-performance leaders in light aircraft wheels and brakes, announces a new nosewheel and axle solution for the popular Van=99s RV-10. The new nosewheel kit includes the lightweight BERINGER wheel and a mounted tubeless tire, plus the unique 1-piece thru-axle and associated parts and hardware necessary for the installation. Builders have long battled the setup of the nose wheel, which, in the original configuration, often results in either too-tight or too-loose fitment, resulting in poor ground handling or excess wear. Not only is the sensitive problem of front-axle tension eliminated with the BERINGER thru-axle, the use of low-resistance ball bearings (instead of the usual tapered rollers) noticeably reduces rolling resistance. While this may not shorten your takeoff roll, you will appreciate it when you=99re parking your RV after a long flight. Retail is $649, and includes high-strength aluminum axle and spacer, plus the assembled wheel assembly with mounted and pressure-tested Michelin tire. 9.1 pounds, total. Beringer wheels feature sealed lifetime ball bearings, high-strength aluminum axles, and a tubeless tire design, saving weight and lowering temperature buildup while reducing the chance of a blowout. Beringer will exhibit at Oshkosh, Booth # 437, and the company plans to offer an =9Cexchange rate discount=9D for customers who pay with dollars. (The amount will depend on the prevailing exchange rate.) Spare and replacement parts are readily available in the USA through Aircraft Spruce. http://www.beringer.fr/aero.php ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 2011
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: New option for nose wheel
Seems to me, IIRC the prices I paid Matco for their solution, this is 2-3 times more expensive than getting the Matco axle and spacers to go with the correct Matco wheel. Beringer wheels are beautiful, but I suspect not all builders will want to spend for this deluxe wheel/axle. On 7/8/2011 7:45 AM, Pascal wrote: > For anyone who did not see this in VAF > > _BERINGER Introduces Nosewheel Solution for*Vans RV-10*_ > > Tallard, France: BERINGER Wheels & Brakes, the high-performance > leaders in light aircraft wheels and brakes, announces a new nosewheel > and axle solution for the popular Vans RV-10. > > The new nosewheel kit includes the lightweight BERINGER wheel and a > mounted tubeless tire, plus the unique 1-piece thru-axle and > associated parts and hardware necessary for the installation. > > Builders have long battled the setup of the nose wheel, which, in the > original configuration, often results in either > too-tight or too-loose fitment, resulting in poor ground handling or > excess wear. > > Not only is the sensitive problem of front-axle tension eliminated > with the BERINGER thru-axle, the use of low-resistance ball bearings > (instead of the usual tapered rollers) noticeably reduces rolling > resistance. While this may not shorten your takeoff roll, you will > appreciate it when youre parking your RV after a long flight. > > Retail is $649, and includes high-strength aluminum axle and spacer, > plus the assembled wheel assembly with mounted and pressure-tested > Michelin tire. 9.1 pounds, total. > > Beringer wheels feature sealed lifetime ball bearings, high-strength > aluminum axles, and a tubeless tire design, saving weight and lowering > temperature buildup while reducing the chance of a blowout. > > Beringer will exhibit at Oshkosh, Booth # 437, and the company plans > to offer an exchange rate discount for customers who pay with > dollars. (The amount will depend on the prevailing exchange rate.) > > Spare and replacement parts are readily available in the USA through > Aircraft Spruce. > > > http://www.beringer.fr/aero.php > > * > > > * ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 08, 2011
From: Linn Walters <pitts_pilot(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: New option for nose wheel
There's also the tire replacement problem. This is a tubeless tire which makes changing much like a car tire. Linn On 7/8/2011 11:11 AM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > > Seems to me, IIRC the prices I paid Matco for their solution, this is > 2-3 times more expensive than getting the Matco axle and spacers to go > with the correct Matco wheel. Beringer wheels are beautiful, but I > suspect not all builders will want to spend for this deluxe wheel/axle. > > > On 7/8/2011 7:45 AM, Pascal wrote: >> For anyone who did not see this in VAF >> >> _BERINGER Introduces Nosewheel Solution for*Vans RV-10*_ >> >> Tallard, France: BERINGER Wheels & Brakes, the high-performance >> leaders in light aircraft wheels and brakes, announces a new >> nosewheel and axle solution for the popular Vans RV-10. >> >> The new nosewheel kit includes the lightweight BERINGER wheel and a >> mounted tubeless tire, plus the unique 1-piece thru-axle and >> associated parts and hardware necessary for the installation. >> >> Builders have long battled the setup of the nose wheel, which, in the >> original configuration, often results in either >> too-tight or too-loose fitment, resulting in poor ground handling or >> excess wear. >> >> Not only is the sensitive problem of front-axle tension eliminated >> with the BERINGER thru-axle, the use of low-resistance ball bearings >> (instead of the usual tapered rollers) noticeably reduces rolling >> resistance. While this may not shorten your takeoff roll, you will >> appreciate it when youre parking your RV after a long flight. >> >> Retail is $649, and includes high-strength aluminum axle and spacer, >> plus the assembled wheel assembly with mounted and pressure-tested >> Michelin tire. 9.1 pounds, total. >> >> Beringer wheels feature sealed lifetime ball bearings, high-strength >> aluminum axles, and a tubeless tire design, saving weight and >> lowering temperature buildup while reducing the chance of a blowout. >> >> Beringer will exhibit at Oshkosh, Booth # 437, and the company plans >> to offer an exchange rate discount for customers who pay with >> dollars. (The amount will depend on the prevailing exchange rate.) >> >> Spare and replacement parts are readily available in the USA through >> Aircraft Spruce. >> >> >> http://www.beringer.fr/aero.php >> >> * >> >> >> * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "E & T Andrews" <etandrews(at)westnet.com.au>
Subject: Re: External Brake Lines - crack
Date: Jul 09, 2011
Many thanks everyone for your input. Vans should consider including the flexible hose lines in the RV10 kit... has this been raised with Vans before? all the best Evan Andrews VH-OSH Flying 154hrs -----Original Message----- From: rv10flyer Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 5:49 AM Subject: RV10-List: Re: External Brake Lines - crack 31 1/2" -3 hose with -4 straight fittings on each end. Like Tim said they know exactly what you need. Everything fit fine on mine. The two hoses from copilot master cylinders to reservoir tee fitting were 1" too long but they still worked. +1 for 5052-O fuel/brake lines. Van's 3003-O is going to be hauled off for scrap this winter after flying. 5052-O would have broken too...it just takes twice as long. Back to wheel pants...oh I love fiberglass. At least the end is near as my pile of parts is getting real small. Ted Chang's BIG West trip on VAF has really got me motivated now. Looking forward to some cool fall test flying. -------- Wayne Gillispie, A&P 5/93, PPC 10/08 Bldr# 40983 SB Started 12/1/09. Fuselage Sec 46 Eng mount/Gear- 1359 hrs to date. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345325#345325 ====== Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.17870) http://www.pctools.com/ ======= ====== Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.17870) http://www.pctools.com/ ====== ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John MacCallum" <vk2gcn(at)cirruscomms.com.au>
Subject: Re: External Brake Lines - crack
Date: Jul 09, 2011
G'day Evan, just thought I would say hello. Good to see another Aussie builder. I'm currently working on The brake lines myself and I was looking at the plans and thought that the solid lines going down The gear leg was not an ideal way to do it. Cheers John MacCallum Builder # 41016 VH-DUU -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of E & T Andrews Sent: Saturday, 9 July 2011 3:07 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: External Brake Lines - crack Many thanks everyone for your input. Vans should consider including the flexible hose lines in the RV10 kit... has this been raised with Vans before? all the best Evan Andrews VH-OSH Flying 154hrs -----Original Message----- From: rv10flyer Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 5:49 AM Subject: RV10-List: Re: External Brake Lines - crack 31 1/2" -3 hose with -4 straight fittings on each end. Like Tim said they know exactly what you need. Everything fit fine on mine. The two hoses from copilot master cylinders to reservoir tee fitting were 1" too long but they still worked. +1 for 5052-O fuel/brake lines. Van's 3003-O is going to be hauled off for scrap this winter after flying. 5052-O would have broken too...it just takes twice as long. Back to wheel pants...oh I love fiberglass. At least the end is near as my pile of parts is getting real small. Ted Chang's BIG West trip on VAF has really got me motivated now. Looking forward to some cool fall test flying. -------- Wayne Gillispie, A&P 5/93, PPC 10/08 Bldr# 40983 SB Started 12/1/09. Fuselage Sec 46 Eng mount/Gear- 1359 hrs to date. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345325#345325 ====== Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.17870) http://www.pctools.com/ ======= ====== Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.17870) http://www.pctools.com/ ====== ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Main gear fire
From: "kevino" <kevino(at)worldwarehouse.com>
Date: Jul 09, 2011
Yesterday flew to Bangor Maine. Has a very long taxi for rw 15 from ga ramp. Near end lost left brake. Ac did several loops getting it stopped. Called ground who is over a mile away and told him I lost brake and he advised I was on fire. Evacuated all four people and grabbed fire ext. Fire was in full force with flames close to reaching wing. Used ext 2.5 halon and snuffed flame. Restarted in about 15 sec. Did it again. Looked up and crash was on their way. They were there in two minutes from ground telling me was on fire. Never knew I had fire until they told me. The fire ext and outstanding crash rescue saved the day. Lost the tire, wheel pant, brakes. Maine aero jumped on the airplane when I finally worked thru the red tape and got it towed in. Replaced tire, rebuilt brakes, pulled wheel pants and flew home last nite. An outstanding response from the crash crew, airport crew and Maine aero, ray lane and his whole crew. Cause was probably brake slightly dragging and needing to keep hitting left brake for directional control while taxiing several miles. Thought you all might be interested. The lack of awareness that a fire had started was frightening.without ground telling me I would not have got it in time not to mention an air force crash crew that was outstanding. Anybody have a spare left wheel pant? Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345552#345552 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Subject: Re: Main gear fire
Date: Jul 09, 2011
Sorry to hear about the fire and associated headaches. Can you say which brake fluid you used....the high temp stuff or the standard stuff? That would be good info. Tim On Jul 9, 2011, at 7:22 AM, "kevino" wrote: > > Yesterday flew to Bangor Maine. Has a very long taxi for rw 15 from ga ramp. Near end lost left brake. Ac did several loops getting it stopped. Called ground who is over a mile away and told him I lost brake and he advised I was on fire. Evacuated all four people and grabbed fire ext. Fire was in full force with flames close to reaching wing. Used ext 2.5 halon and snuffed flame. Restarted in about 15 sec. Did it again. Looked up and crash was on their way. They were there in two minutes from ground telling me was on fire. Never knew I had fire until they told me. The fire ext and outstanding crash rescue saved the day. Lost the tire, wheel pant, brakes. Maine aero jumped on the airplane when I finally worked thru the red tape and got it towed in. Replaced tire, rebuilt brakes, pulled wheel pants and flew home last nite. An outstanding response from the crash crew, airport crew and Maine aero, ray lane and his whole crew. > Cause was probably brake slightly dragging and needing to keep hitting left brake for directional control while taxiing several miles. > Thought you all might be interested. The lack of awareness that a fire had started was frightening.without ground telling me I would not have got it in time not to mention an air force crash crew that was outstanding. > Anybody have a spare left wheel pant? > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345552#345552 > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 2011
Subject: Re: External Brake Lines - crack
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Van's would consider adding flex lines about the same time as they consider stocking the correct nose wheel. They won't change the nose wheel even though the correct one is exactly the same price. Flex lines could add over $100 to the cost, especially if you include flex lines in place of the crummy nylon lines in the cabin. Somehow we have been deluded into wanting durability similar to certified aircraft................what a crazy idea. On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:06 PM, E & T Andrews wrote: Vans should consider including the > flexible hose lines in the RV10 kit... has this been raised with Vans > before? > > all the best > > Evan Andrews ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 2011
Subject: Re: Main gear fire
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
That would be Mil 83282 brake fluid as opposed to Mil 5606. On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Tim Olson wrote: > > Sorry to hear about the fire and associated headaches. Can you say which brake fluid you used....the high temp stuff or the standard stuff? That would be good info. > Tim > > > On Jul 9, 2011, at 7:22 AM, "kevino" wrote: > >> >> Yesterday flew to Bangor Maine. Has a very long taxi for rw 15 from ga ramp. Near end lost left brake. Ac did several loops getting it stopped. Called ground who is over a mile away and told him I lost brake and he advised I was on fire. Evacuated all four people and grabbed fire ext. Fire was in full force with flames close to reaching wing. Used ext 2.5 halon and snuffed flame. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Main gear fire
From: "kevino" <kevino(at)worldwarehouse.com>
Date: Jul 09, 2011
5606. Hadn't thought about that Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345587#345587 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 2011
From: Linn Walters <pitts_pilot(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Main gear fire
What kind of brake line did you have attached to the wheel cylinder??? I'm guessing that the fire was due to a brake fluid leak ..... how did it escape??? Linn On 7/9/2011 8:22 AM, kevino wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: "kevino" > > Yesterday flew to Bangor Maine. Has a very long taxi for rw 15 from ga ramp. Near end lost left brake. Ac did several loops getting it stopped. Called ground who is over a mile away and told him I lost brake and he advised I was on fire. Evacuated all four people and grabbed fire ext. Fire was in full force with flames close to reaching wing. Used ext 2.5 halon and snuffed flame. Restarted in about 15 sec. Did it again. Looked up and crash was on their way. They were there in two minutes from ground telling me was on fire. Never knew I had fire until they told me. The fire ext and outstanding crash rescue saved the day. Lost the tire, wheel pant, brakes. Maine aero jumped on the airplane when I finally worked thru the red tape and got it towed in. Replaced tire, rebuilt brakes, pulled wheel pants and flew home last nite. An outstanding response from the crash crew, airport crew and Maine aero, ray lane and his whole crew. > Cause was probably brake slightly dragging and needing to keep hitting left brake for directional control while taxiing several miles. > Thought you all might be interested. The lack of awareness that a fire had started was frightening.without ground telling me I would not have got it in time not to mention an air force crash crew that was outstanding. > Anybody have a spare left wheel pant? > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345552#345552 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Main gear fire
From: "kevino" <kevino(at)worldwarehouse.com>
Date: Jul 09, 2011
Aluminum lines. No evidence of leaking prior to fire. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345592#345592 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Main gear fire
From: Marcus Cooper <coop85(at)verizon.net>
Date: Jul 09, 2011
Very well handled by all and I'm glad things didn't get any worse than they did. This is by no means a dig and may not apply to your situation, but food for thought for all based on some experiences I've seen regarding using the brakes. I've seen a lot of folks ride the brakes lightly during long taxis to avoid getting fast. Having flown little airplanes with great big engines and small wheels/brakes I was taught long ago to let the airplane roll, then apply moderate braking periodically to keep the speed under control. Brakes will heat up a lot more when a little pressure is applied over a long time than periodic more aggressive braking. We used to have an academic slide show that showed two guys sitting in two kettles of water, one that had a big, rapid fire that while unpleasant flashed over quickly with no big deal, while the other simmered over a low continuous fire until it boiled. Probably an odd analogy but pretty good overall. I saw an Airbus captain taxiing behind a very slow airplane do the same thing just a few days ago and we had to delay takeoff because of brakes temps. In short, let the airplane get going without brakes as fast as you are comfortable then hit the brakes and slow to a crawl, release the brakes and start over again and your brakes will be much happier and will also be there for you when you need them. Marcus 40286 On Jul 9, 2011, at 8:22 AM, kevino wrote: > > Yesterday flew to Bangor Maine. Has a very long taxi for rw 15 from ga ramp. Near end lost left brake. Ac did several loops getting it stopped. Called ground who is over a mile away and told him I lost brake and he advised I was on fire. Evacuated all four people and grabbed fire ext. Fire was in full force with flames close to reaching wing. Used ext 2.5 halon and snuffed flame. Restarted in about 15 sec. Did it again. Looked up and crash was on their way. They were there in two minutes from ground telling me was on fire. Never knew I had fire until they told me. The fire ext and outstanding crash rescue saved the day. Lost the tire, wheel pant, brakes. Maine aero jumped on the airplane when I finally worked thru the red tape and got it towed in. Replaced tire, rebuilt brakes, pulled wheel pants and flew home last nite. An outstanding response from the crash crew, airport crew and Maine aero, ray lane and his whole crew. > Cause was probably brake slightly dragging and needing to keep hitting left brake for directional control while taxiing several miles. > Thought you all might be interested. The lack of awareness that a fire had started was frightening.without ground telling me I would not have got it in time not to mention an air force crash crew that was outstanding. > Anybody have a spare left wheel pant? > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345552#345552 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Main gear fire
Date: Jul 09, 2011
From: "John Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com>
Great information. The mass of our rotors absorbs converted energy in the form of heat created through friction from the pad contact. Sustained "deep" heat is worse than momentary higher concentrated heat. Energy transfer is nearly the same. Vented, drilled rotors and cooling ductwork can help. More mass, more pad contact area, use of less flammable brake fluid H-83282 versus H-5606 can only help. On Recips, lower rpm often also can lead to clinkers forming on the lower plugs. It is all about appropriate tradeoffs. John -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Cooper Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 11:56 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Main gear fire Very well handled by all and I'm glad things didn't get any worse than they did. This is by no means a dig and may not apply to your situation, but food for thought for all based on some experiences I've seen regarding using the brakes. I've seen a lot of folks ride the brakes lightly during long taxis to avoid getting fast. Having flown little airplanes with great big engines and small wheels/brakes I was taught long ago to let the airplane roll, then apply moderate braking periodically to keep the speed under control. Brakes will heat up a lot more when a little pressure is applied over a long time than periodic more aggressive braking. We used to have an academic slide show that showed two guys sitting in two kettles of water, one that had a big, rapid fire that while unpleasant flashed over quickly with no big deal, while the other simmered over a low continuous fire until it boiled. Probably an odd analogy but pretty good overall. I saw an Airbus captain taxiing ! behind a very slow airplane do the same thing just a few days ago and we had to delay takeoff because of brakes temps. In short, let the airplane get going without brakes as fast as you are comfortable then hit the brakes and slow to a crawl, release the brakes and start over again and your brakes will be much happier and will also be there for you when you need them. Marcus 40286 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 2011
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Subject: Re: Main gear fire
I'm FAR from an expert on the stuff, as you can tell by how Kelly remembers the milspec numbers by heart and I can't even do that....but here is what Wiki says: Mil-H-5606: Mineral base, flammable, fairly low flashpoint, usable from -65 F (-54 C) to 275 F (135 C), red color Mil-H-83282: Synthetic hydrocarbon base, higher flashpoint, self-extinguishing, backward compatible to -5606, red color, rated to -40 F (-40 C) degrees. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_fluid Given that, it's pretty easy to see how brakes can heat up to over 275F on a long taxi. So with our castering nosewheel planes that kind of invite the bad habit of riding brakes, I think it's kind of a good idea to just switch it out. It's about $9 for plenty to do the whole plane and have a lot of spare. I can't find the flash point on the 83282 stuff, but, this link says it's over 200F HIGHER than the 5606. http://www.tpub.com/content/aviation/14018/css/14018_178.htm So that would be my first move now. I should add that to my page of things to definitely change or do. I think maybe we as a group should try to keep this info out there so that nobody uses 5606 at all....none of the fleet. A good friend of mine with an RV-10 had a wheel fire as well. Wrecked the tire and causes a bit of other damage. Just a no good situation. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD On 7/9/2011 10:45 AM, kevino wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: "kevino" > > 5606. Hadn't thought about that > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 2011
From: Linn Walters <pitts_pilot(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Main gear fire
Brake fires are caused by a failure of the system to contain the brake fluid. We know that cracking of the hard aluminum will allow fluid to escape. We also know that when brake pads are allowed to wear way down, the brake puck can extend out far enough so that fluid can escape around the O-ring. So far, we haven't heard how the fluid escaped or if "kevino" really knows. Years ago when the 'plastic' aircraft were all the rage, the failure was caused by the heat melting the plastic brake lines. Not so, in this case. So I started to search for some numbers. I found a document here: http://www.everyspec.com/MIL-SPECS/MIL+SPECS+%28MIL-H%29/MIL-H-83282C_6037/ which lists minimum flash point at 205 C (405 F) and minimum fire point at 245 C (473 F). Auto ignition is 345 C (653 F). Minimum pour point -55 C (-67 F). For 5606 minimum flash point at 82 C (180 F) (minimum fire point is missing). (Auto ignition is missing). Minimum pour point -60 C (-76 F). Different numbers from Tim's but still significantly different than 5606. So Tim's suggestion to go to 83282 is a good one. The 5606 spec was written in 1986 and 83282 in 1994. Linn On 7/9/2011 2:50 PM, Tim Olson wrote: > > I'm FAR from an expert on the stuff, as you can tell by > how Kelly remembers the milspec numbers by heart and I > can't even do that....but here is what Wiki says: > > > Mil-H-5606: Mineral base, flammable, fairly low flashpoint, usable > from -65 F (-54 C) to 275 F (135 C), red color > > > Mil-H-83282: Synthetic hydrocarbon base, higher flashpoint, > self-extinguishing, backward compatible to -5606, red color, rated to > -40 F (-40 C) degrees. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_fluid > > > Given that, it's pretty easy to see how brakes can heat up to over > 275F on a long taxi. So with our castering nosewheel planes that > kind of invite the bad habit of riding brakes, I think it's > kind of a good idea to just switch it out. It's about $9 > for plenty to do the whole plane and have a lot of spare. > I can't find the flash point on the 83282 stuff, but, this > link says it's over 200F HIGHER than the 5606. > > http://www.tpub.com/content/aviation/14018/css/14018_178.htm > > So that would be my first move now. I should add that to my > page of things to definitely change or do. I think maybe we > as a group should try to keep this info out there so that > nobody uses 5606 at all....none of the fleet. A good friend > of mine with an RV-10 had a wheel fire as well. Wrecked the > tire and causes a bit of other damage. Just a no good situation. > > Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD > > > On 7/9/2011 10:45 AM, kevino wrote: >> --> RV10-List message posted by: "kevino" >> >> 5606. Hadn't thought about that >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 2011
Subject: Re: Main gear fire
From: Dj Merrill <deej(at)deej.net>
On 7/9/2011 2:50 PM, Tim Olson wrote: > > I can't find the flash point on the 83282 stuff, but, this > link says it's over 200F HIGHER than the 5606. Skygeek has some specs on it: http://www.skygeek.com/royco-782-synthetic-fire-resistant-hydraulic-fluid.html then click the "Specifications" tab. Flash point 218C, 424F Fire point 251C, 483F -Dj -- Dj Merrill - N1JOV Sportsman 2+2 Builder #7118 N421DJ - http://deej.net/sportsman/ Glastar Flyer N866RH - http://deej.net/glastar/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Date: Jul 09, 2011
Subject: Re: Main gear fire
When swapping over to the high temp fluid I recall one has to replace all the seals is in the system. Is this correct? How much effort is involved in that change? Robin -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dj Merrill Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 1:07 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Main gear fire On 7/9/2011 2:50 PM, Tim Olson wrote: > > I can't find the flash point on the 83282 stuff, but, this > link says it's over 200F HIGHER than the 5606. Skygeek has some specs on it: http://www.skygeek.com/royco-782-synthetic-fire-resistant-hydraulic-fluid. html then click the "Specifications" tab. Flash point 218C, 424F Fire point 251C, 483F -Dj -- Dj Merrill - N1JOV Sportsman 2+2 Builder #7118 N421DJ - http://deej.net/sportsman/ Glastar Flyer N866RH - http://deej.net/glastar/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Miller John <gengrumpy(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Main gear fire
Date: Jul 09, 2011
For what it's worth, here is what I have been using in my bird since day one. Valvoline DEX/MERC automatic transmission fluid VV324, flash point 202=B0 C / 395=B0 F grumpy N184JM On Jul 9, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Tim Olson wrote: > > I'm FAR from an expert on the stuff, as you can tell by > how Kelly remembers the milspec numbers by heart and I > can't even do that....but here is what Wiki says: > > > Mil-H-5606: Mineral base, flammable, fairly low flashpoint, usable from -65 =B0F (-54 =B0C) to 275 =B0F (135 =B0C), red color > > > Mil-H-83282: Synthetic hydrocarbon base, higher flashpoint, self-extinguishing, backward compatible to -5606, red color, rated to -40 =B0F (-40 =B0C) degrees. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_fluid > > > Given that, it's pretty easy to see how brakes can heat up to over > 275F on a long taxi. So with our castering nosewheel planes that > kind of invite the bad habit of riding brakes, I think it's > kind of a good idea to just switch it out. It's about $9 > for plenty to do the whole plane and have a lot of spare. > I can't find the flash point on the 83282 stuff, but, this > link says it's over 200F HIGHER than the 5606. > > http://www.tpub.com/content/aviation/14018/css/14018_178.htm > > So that would be my first move now. I should add that to my > page of things to definitely change or do. I think maybe we > as a group should try to keep this info out there so that > nobody uses 5606 at all....none of the fleet. A good friend > of mine with an RV-10 had a wheel fire as well. Wrecked the > tire and causes a bit of other damage. Just a no good situation. > > Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD > > > > On 7/9/2011 10:45 AM, kevino wrote: >> --> RV10-List message posted by: "kevino" >> >> 5606. Hadn't thought about that >> > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 2011
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Main gear fire
What is the difference in viscosity of ATF vs mil spec brake fluid? I'm fairly certain that mil spec brake fluid has some requirements on viscosity at various temps and other characteristics that make it more desirable for brake applications. If you need to top up the resevoir at an airport, you are pretty sure to find 5606, not so much the ATF or 83282. You know that 5606 and 83282 are proven to be compatible, even if you lower the flash point some. ATF saves you maybe $5 over the high price 83282? On 7/9/2011 1:29 PM, Miller John wrote: > For what it's worth, here is what I have been using in my bird since > day one. > > Valvoline DEX/MERC automatic transmission fluid VV324,flash point > 202C / 395F > > grumpy > > N184JM > > * > * ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 2011
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Main gear fire
No seal replacement required. Remember 83282 is 100% compatible with 5606. If you want a slightly more durable seal you can go from MS seals to Viton. Don't know any reason to, other than it probably resists high temp better while is less flexible at low temps. If your mission is between ElK Mound and International Falls year round you probably want the standard 5606 and MS seals. The calipers are no more than popping the brake cylinder out of the caliper and changing the O-rings. At the master cylinders, you get to rebuild them...but they aren't ever going to see the temps the calipers do. All depends on how much effort you want to do, and what your normal mission profile is. Those that get OHare and Hartsfield taxi routes probably want the higher temps, like those of us on the southern fringe of the country. Do you want to go into procurement mode, get the fluid, get Viton O-rings after figuring out exact size needed, and so on, just like the rest of the build process? The mechanical work on the calipers is child's play. Draining your system should get you 90 percent of benefit, vs flushing system and then adding 83282. You get the fun of bleeding the system either way. On 7/9/2011 1:23 PM, Robin Marks wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: Robin Marks > > When swapping over to the high temp fluid I recall one has to replace all > the seals is in the system. Is this correct? How much effort is involved > in that change? > > Robin > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dj Merrill > Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 1:07 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Main gear fire > > --> RV10-List message posted by: Dj Merrill > > On 7/9/2011 2:50 PM, Tim Olson wrote: >> I can't find the flash point on the 83282 stuff, but, this >> link says it's over 200F HIGHER than the 5606. > Skygeek has some specs on it: > > http://www.skygeek.com/royco-782-synthetic-fire-resistant-hydraulic-fluid. > html > > then click the "Specifications" tab. > > Flash point 218C, 424F > Fire point 251C, 483F > > -Dj > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Main gear fire
From: Kevin Belue <kdbelue(at)charter.net>
Date: Jul 09, 2011
Another leak point is the piston seals - they leak when they get too hot. I had the same problem with brakes that got too hot while taxiing a long way with a cross wind. The brakes got very hot and leaked which smoked a lot, but no fire because I used the 83282 fluid. The original seals were bad due to the heat so I replaced them with viton seals which can stand a higher temperature. I would have had a fire if I had used the 5606 fluid..... Sent from my iPhone On Jul 9, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Linn Walters wrote: > > Brake fires are caused by a failure of the system to contain the brake fluid. We know that cracking of the hard aluminum will allow fluid to escape. We also know that when brake pads are allowed to wear way down, the brake puck can extend out far enough so that fluid can escape around the O-ring. So far, we haven't heard how the fluid escaped or if "kevino" really knows. Years ago when the 'plastic' aircraft were all the rage, the failure was caused by the heat melting the plastic brake lines. Not so, in this case. > > So I started to search for some numbers. I found a document here: http://www.everyspec.com/MIL-SPECS/MIL+SPECS+%28MIL-H%29/MIL-H-83282C_6037/ > which lists minimum flash point at 205 C (405 F) and minimum fire point at 245 C (473 F). Auto ignition is 345 C (653 F). Minimum pour point -55 C (-67 F). > For 5606 minimum flash point at 82 C (180 F) (minimum fire point is missing). (Auto ignition is missing). Minimum pour point -60 C (-76 F). > > Different numbers from Tim's but still significantly different than 5606. > > So Tim's suggestion to go to 83282 is a good one. > The 5606 spec was written in 1986 and 83282 in 1994. > > Linn > > > > > On 7/9/2011 2:50 PM, Tim Olson wrote: >> >> I'm FAR from an expert on the stuff, as you can tell by >> how Kelly remembers the milspec numbers by heart and I >> can't even do that....but here is what Wiki says: >> >> >> Mil-H-5606: Mineral base, flammable, fairly low flashpoint, usable from -65 F (-54 C) to 275 F (135 C), red color >> >> >> Mil-H-83282: Synthetic hydrocarbon base, higher flashpoint, self-extinguishing, backward compatible to -5606, red color, rated to -40 F (-40 C) degrees. >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_fluid >> >> >> Given that, it's pretty easy to see how brakes can heat up to over >> 275F on a long taxi. So with our castering nosewheel planes that >> kind of invite the bad habit of riding brakes, I think it's >> kind of a good idea to just switch it out. It's about $9 >> for plenty to do the whole plane and have a lot of spare. >> I can't find the flash point on the 83282 stuff, but, this >> link says it's over 200F HIGHER than the 5606. >> >> http://www.tpub.com/content/aviation/14018/css/14018_178.htm >> >> So that would be my first move now. I should add that to my >> page of things to definitely change or do. I think maybe we >> as a group should try to keep this info out there so that >> nobody uses 5606 at all....none of the fleet. A good friend >> of mine with an RV-10 had a wheel fire as well. Wrecked the >> tire and causes a bit of other damage. Just a no good situation. >> >> Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD >> >> >> >> On 7/9/2011 10:45 AM, kevino wrote: >>> --> RV10-List message posted by: "kevino" >>> >>> 5606. Hadn't thought about that >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Subject: Re: Main gear fire
Date: Jul 09, 2011
I didn't change my seals in the whole system. I DID go to viton seals in the caliper itself though. They're cheap. Tim On Jul 9, 2011, at 3:23 PM, Robin Marks wrote: > > When swapping over to the high temp fluid I recall one has to replace all > the seals is in the system. Is this correct? How much effort is involved > in that change? > > Robin > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dj Merrill > Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 1:07 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Main gear fire > > > On 7/9/2011 2:50 PM, Tim Olson wrote: >> >> I can't find the flash point on the 83282 stuff, but, this >> link says it's over 200F HIGHER than the 5606. > > Skygeek has some specs on it: > > http://www.skygeek.com/royco-782-synthetic-fire-resistant-hydraulic-fluid. > html > > then click the "Specifications" tab. > > Flash point 218C, 424F > Fire point 251C, 483F > > -Dj > > -- > Dj Merrill - N1JOV > Sportsman 2+2 Builder #7118 N421DJ - http://deej.net/sportsman/ > Glastar Flyer N866RH - http://deej.net/glastar/ > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Main gear fire
From: Miller John <gengrumpy(at)aol.com>
Date: Jul 09, 2011
And bleed from the bottom up!!! Far easier and a whole lot cleaner way to do it. Just get a qt pump-type oil can with flex tip on it, get some plastic tubing that fits over the bleed valve, put an overflow tube from the reservoir with a can to collect it, and pump away. Can't believe it took me so long to figure that one out........-:) grumpy N184JM On Jul 9, 2011, at 3:50 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > > No seal replacement required. Remember 83282 is 100% compatible with 5606. If you want a slightly more durable seal you can go from MS seals to Viton. Don't know any reason to, other than it probably resists high temp better while is less flexible at low temps. If your mission is between ElK Mound and International Falls year round you probably want the standard 5606 and MS seals. > The calipers are no more than popping the brake cylinder out of the caliper and changing the O-rings. At the master cylinders, you get to rebuild them...but they aren't ever going to see the temps the calipers do. > All depends on how much effort you want to do, and what your normal mission profile is. Those that get OHare and Hartsfield taxi routes probably want the higher temps, like those of us on the southern fringe of the country. > Do you want to go into procurement mode, get the fluid, get Viton O-rings after figuring out exact size needed, and so on, just like the rest of the build process? The mechanical work on the calipers is child's play. Draining your system should get you 90 percent of benefit, vs flushing system and then adding 83282. You get the fun of bleeding the system either way. > > > On 7/9/2011 1:23 PM, Robin Marks wrote: >> --> RV10-List message posted by: Robin Marks >> >> When swapping over to the high temp fluid I recall one has to replace all >> the seals is in the system. Is this correct? How much effort is involved >> in that change? >> >> Robin >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dj Merrill >> Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 1:07 PM >> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Main gear fire >> >> --> RV10-List message posted by: Dj Merrill >> >> On 7/9/2011 2:50 PM, Tim Olson wrote: >>> I can't find the flash point on the 83282 stuff, but, this >>> link says it's over 200F HIGHER than the 5606. >> Skygeek has some specs on it: >> >> http://www.skygeek.com/royco-782-synthetic-fire-resistant-hydraulic-fluid. >> html >> >> then click the "Specifications" tab. >> >> Flash point 218C, 424F >> Fire point 251C, 483F >> >> -Dj >> > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Cumins" <jcumins(at)jcis.net>
Subject: Re: Main gear fire
Date: Jul 09, 2011
Robin No seal changes are required to go to 83232 fluid. In 1985 when I was a crew chief in the air force on the c-5 we flushed and changed out all planes to 83232 hyd fluid with out any seals changed. They can even be mixed together if in a tight spot but I would not recommend it. I will be swapping out our Saratoga in the next oil change before we put the wheel [ants back on after the annual. John Cumins President 707-425-7100 707-425-7576 Fax -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robin Marks Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 1:24 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Main gear fire When swapping over to the high temp fluid I recall one has to replace all the seals is in the system. Is this correct? How much effort is involved in that change? Robin -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dj Merrill Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 1:07 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Main gear fire On 7/9/2011 2:50 PM, Tim Olson wrote: > > I can't find the flash point on the 83282 stuff, but, this link says > it's over 200F HIGHER than the 5606. Skygeek has some specs on it: http://www.skygeek.com/royco-782-synthetic-fire-resistant-hydraulic-fluid. html then click the "Specifications" tab. Flash point 218C, 424F Fire point 251C, 483F -Dj -- Dj Merrill - N1JOV Sportsman 2+2 Builder #7118 N421DJ - http://deej.net/sportsman/ Glastar Flyer N866RH - http://deej.net/glastar/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Dave Saylor <dave.saylor.aircrafters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Jul 09, 2011
Subject: Re: Main gear fire
I've had mixed results with the pump-can bleeder but we still use one in the field. I think the problem is that without sufficient flow, you can still trap bubbles at the top of an arced tube. The fluid just flows under the bubble. For the shop, we built a brake bleeder out of a power steering pump. We turn it with a drill motor. Added a return like John said, a reservoir and a little plumbing. It works like a champ at about 20-30 psi. Dave Saylor AirCrafters 140 Aviation Way Watsonville, CA 95076 831-722-9141 Shop 831-750-0284 Cell On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Miller John wrote: > > And bleed from the bottom up!!! > > Far easier and a whole lot cleaner way to do it. > > Just get a qt pump-type oil can with flex tip on it, get some plastic tubing that fits over the bleed valve, put an overflow tube from the reservoir with a can to collect it, and pump away. > > Can't believe it took me so long to figure that one out........-:) > > grumpy > N184JM > > > On Jul 9, 2011, at 3:50 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > >> >> No seal replacement required. Remember 83282 is 100% compatible with 5606. If you want a slightly more durable seal you can go from MS seals to Viton. Don't know any reason to, other than it probably resists high temp better while is less flexible at low temps. If your mission is between ElK Mound and International Falls year round you probably want the standard 5606 and MS seals. >> The calipers are no more than popping the brake cylinder out of the caliper and changing the O-rings. At the master cylinders, you get to rebuild them...but they aren't ever going to see the temps the calipers do. >> All depends on how much effort you want to do, and what your normal mission profile is. Those that get OHare and Hartsfield taxi routes probably want the higher temps, like those of us on the southern fringe of the country. >> Do you want to go into procurement mode, get the fluid, get Viton O-rings after figuring out exact size needed, and so on, just like the rest of the build process? The mechanical work on the calipers is child's play. Draining your system should get you 90 percent of benefit, vs flushing system and then adding 83282. You get the fun of bleeding the system either way. >> >> >> On 7/9/2011 1:23 PM, Robin Marks wrote: >>> >>> When swapping over to the high temp fluid I recall one has to replace all >>> the seals is in the system. Is this correct? How much effort is involved >>> in that change? >>> >>> Robin >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >>> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dj Merrill >>> Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 1:07 PM >>> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >>> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Main gear fire >>> >>> >>> On 7/9/2011 2:50 PM, Tim Olson wrote: >>>> I can't find the flash point on the 83282 stuff, but, this >>>> link says it's over 200F HIGHER than the 5606. >>> Skygeek has some specs on it: >>> >>> http://www.skygeek.com/royco-782-synthetic-fire-resistant-hydraulic-fluid. >>> html >>> >>> then click the "Specifications" tab. >>> >>> Flash point 218C, 424F >>> Fire point 251C, 483F >>> >>> -Dj >>> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 2011
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Bose A20 Headset - NR Power Button - Panel Power
Dear Listers, I bought a couple pairs of the new Bose A20's for the RV-8 and they are very nice. NR is better than the Bose X's and they seem to fit my head a little better too. But I quickly discovered that with the A20's you now have to hit the NR Power button *every time* you start the aircraft even if you have them panel powered. The older Bose X headsets have a slide switch for the NR power and so you can just put the slide switch in the On position and not worry about it. I really didn't like having to turn the NR on all the time and having to remind my passengers about it, so I came up with a modification that will automatically turn the NR on when panel power is applied. Its pretty simple, but requires some special tools. Its completely self-contained inside the Control Module and works great. The modification is generally only for installations that are panel-powered, but you could do the modification to a unit that is normally battery powered with no adverse effect. With the modification, the NR Power button will work normally in battery power installations. I created web page on the procedure including step-by-step photos and instructions. Feedback is welcome. http://www.matronics.com/BoseA20AutoOnModification/ Matt - Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 170+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 2011
From: Scott Schmidt <scottmschmidt(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Big Sky Air Race
Sean and I just got back from Three Forks, Montana and had a great time running in the race up there today. We represented our RV-10 group pretty good, I think. There were about 30 planes running in the race and the weather was perfect, the Sacajawea Hotel there is great with a very good restaurant and they did a good job organizing everything. If you are ever in the area it would be a fun place to stop over for a night and enjoy the quaint town and small town airport. It was a 126nm course and pretty flat. Sean's plane is still very new and I was surprised at how close we both were but we do have the same engine and prop. He is still breaking in the engine and we have some tweaking to do on the ailerons. I averaged 204.6 mph and Sean was 203.8. I don't have all the results but the -10 was right there and sometimes faster than the -6's, -7's and -8's. I'll do it again. Scott Schmidt ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 2011
From: Linn Walters <pitts_pilot(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: brake bleeding
I made a 'bottle' out of 2" PVC. Pipe plug in one end to fill with, cap on the other. Two holes below the pipe plug end. Plastic hose through one hole down to the bottom where the cap is and the other end goes on the bleed fitting. My air gun goes into the other hole. Bleeds almost any brake system quickly! Linn ..... got hand cramps from pumping that oil can!!! On 7/9/2011 9:36 PM, Dave Saylor wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: Dave Saylor > > I've had mixed results with the pump-can bleeder but we still use one > in the field. I think the problem is that without sufficient flow, > you can still trap bubbles at the top of an arced tube. The fluid > just flows under the bubble. > > For the shop, we built a brake bleeder out of a power steering pump. > We turn it with a drill motor. Added a return like John said, a > reservoir and a little plumbing. It works like a champ at about 20-30 > psi. > > Dave Saylor > AirCrafters > 140 Aviation Way > Watsonville, CA 95076 > 831-722-9141 Shop > 831-750-0284 Cell > > > On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Miller John wrote: >> --> RV10-List message posted by: Miller John >> >> And bleed from the bottom up!!! >> >> Far easier and a whole lot cleaner way to do it. >> >> Just get a qt pump-type oil can with flex tip on it, get some plastic tubing that fits over the bleed valve, put an overflow tube from the reservoir with a can to collect it, and pump away. >> >> Can't believe it took me so long to figure that one out........-:) >> >> grumpy >> N184JM >> >> >> On Jul 9, 2011, at 3:50 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote: >> >>> --> RV10-List message posted by: Kelly McMullen >>> >>> No seal replacement required. Remember 83282 is 100% compatible with 5606. If you want a slightly more durable seal you can go from MS seals to Viton. Don't know any reason to, other than it probably resists high temp better while is less flexible at low temps. If your mission is between ElK Mound and International Falls year round you probably want the standard 5606 and MS seals. >>> The calipers are no more than popping the brake cylinder out of the caliper and changing the O-rings. At the master cylinders, you get to rebuild them...but they aren't ever going to see the temps the calipers do. >>> All depends on how much effort you want to do, and what your normal mission profile is. Those that get OHare and Hartsfield taxi routes probably want the higher temps, like those of us on the southern fringe of the country. >>> Do you want to go into procurement mode, get the fluid, get Viton O-rings after figuring out exact size needed, and so on, just like the rest of the build process? The mechanical work on the calipers is child's play. Draining your system should get you 90 percent of benefit, vs flushing system and then adding 83282. You get the fun of bleeding the system either way. >>> >>> >>> On 7/9/2011 1:23 PM, Robin Marks wrote: >>>> --> RV10-List message posted by: Robin Marks >>>> >>>> When swapping over to the high temp fluid I recall one has to replace all >>>> the seals is in the system. Is this correct? How much effort is involved >>>> in that change? >>>> >>>> Robin >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >>>> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dj Merrill >>>> Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 1:07 PM >>>> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >>>> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Main gear fire >>>> >>>> --> RV10-List message posted by: Dj Merrill >>>> >>>> On 7/9/2011 2:50 PM, Tim Olson wrote: >>>>> I can't find the flash point on the 83282 stuff, but, this >>>>> link says it's over 200F HIGHER than the 5606. >>>> Skygeek has some specs on it: >>>> >>>> http://www.skygeek.com/royco-782-synthetic-fire-resistant-hydraulic-fluid. >>>> html >>>> >>>> then click the "Specifications" tab. >>>> >>>> Flash point 218C, 424F >>>> Fire point 251C, 483F >>>> >>>> -Dj >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Date: Jul 09, 2011
Subject: Big Sky Air Race
Scott, What general engine settings are you flying in a race like that. MP (max I assume), RPM? At what ALT is the race conducted plus fuel burn when racing? Thanks, Robin *From:* owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Scott Schmidt *Sent:* Saturday, July 09, 2011 6:51 PM *To:* RV-10 List *Subject:* RV10-List: Big Sky Air Race Sean and I just got back from Three Forks, Montana and had a great time running in the race up there today. We represented our RV-10 group pretty good, I think. There were about 30 planes running in the race and the weather was perfect, the Sacajawea Hotel there is great with a very good restaurant and they did a good job organizing everything. If you are ever in the area it would be a fun place to stop over for a night and enjoy the quaint town and small town airport. It was a 126nm course and pretty flat. Sean's plane is still very new and I was surprised at how close we both were but we do have the same engine and prop. He is still breaking in the engine and we have some tweaking to do on the ailerons. I averaged 204.6 mph and Sean was 203.8. I don't have all the results but the -10 was right there and sometimes faster than the -6's, -7's and -8's. I'll do it again. Scott Schmidt * * * * * * ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 2011
Subject: Re: External Brake Lines - crack
From: William Curtis <wcurtis(at)nerv10.com>
Kelly, I beg to differ but in certified aircraft that I am familiar, (Cessna) flexible lines are used only where absolutely necessary. The preference by certified aircraft designers is to use hard lines as much as practicable if only so that there is no life limit on the line. This was driven home to me when I stood on the rear door of a C-17 and looked up at all the hydraulic plumbing. With all those movable parts and doors, NOT a single flexible line --not even at the actuators. Where the line required movement, solid lines with mechanical (banjo style) flexible fluid couplings were used. I took a picture of it but I have to find it. I know some Pipers use a short flexible line between their fuel tanks and the fuselage fuel coupling. However on the Cardinal that; when in doubt I ask "what would Cessna do" just as with Vans, flexible lines are kept to a minimum and used only where absolutely necessary. In the Cardinal fuel system, there are NO flexible lines. In the Cardinal electro-hydraulic gear system there are only four short flexible lines at the nose and main gear actuators. In the retractable gear Cardinal, the brake line in the main gear is a solid line. A the top of the RG brake line is a solid mechanical swivel fitting and only on the lower portion by the wheel is a short easily replaced flexible line used--remember this is a retractable gear aircraft. The point in all this is that hard lines ARE the standard in the certified and military world in most areas and flexible lines are the exception. Flexible lines are used only where hard lines are impractical or expensive such as the movable mechanical (banjo type) fluid connectors. Just an alternative $0.02. William N237VX On Jul 9, 2011, at 10:25, Kelly McMullen wrote: > > Van's would consider adding flex lines about the same time as they > consider stocking the correct nose wheel. They won't change the nose > wheel even though the correct one is exactly the same price. Flex > lines could add over $100 to the cost, especially if you include flex > lines in place of the crummy nylon lines in the cabin. Somehow we have > been deluded into wanting durability similar to certified > aircraft................what a crazy idea. > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:06 PM, E & T Andrews wrote: > Vans should consider including the >> flexible hose lines in the RV10 kit... has this been raised with Vans >> before? >> >> all the best >> >> Evan Andrews ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 2011
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: External Brake Lines - crack
You will find that the vast majority of Cleveland brakes are connected via flex lines. Yes, there may be hard lines to somewhere nearby, but the movement of the gear leg and the movement of the caliper is a flex line. For example, the brake lines on my Mooney are flexible from the center of the gear well down the gear leg to the wheel, all flex line. While most fixed gear Cessnas had hard line down the gear leg, the connection to the caliper usually was flex line if Cleveland or McCauley brakes were used, because the caliper moves. With Goodyear brakes there was hard line all the way, because the caliper was fixed and the disk moved inside the wheel. Fuel lines are a combination. Most Cessnas (with wing struts) have flex line between the wing and the fuselage. My Mooney has flex line between the wing fuel pickup and the hard line to the selector. Where there is movement or vibration, like in the engine compartment, flex line is used. Where there are hard lines, they are made of higher quality tubing on production equipment, not out of soft line with hand tools. The only place I have seen tubing of similar low quality is the oil drainback tubes on Lycoming engines. I wouldn't call a C-17 a certified aircraft, because like most military only aircraft, it isn't. They have very different missions and different maintenance practices, not to mention vastly different pricing. On 7/9/2011 8:56 PM, William Curtis wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: William Curtis > > Kelly, > > > I beg to differ but in certified aircraft that I am familiar, (Cessna) > flexible lines are used only where absolutely necessary. The > preference by certified aircraft designers is to use hard lines as > much as practicable if only so that there is no life limit on the > line. > > This was driven home to me when I stood on the rear door of a C-17 and > looked up at all the hydraulic plumbing. With all those movable parts > and doors, NOT a single flexible line --not even at the actuators. > Where the line required movement, solid lines with mechanical (banjo > style) flexible fluid couplings were used. I took a picture of it but > I have to find it. > > I know some Pipers use a short flexible line between their fuel tanks > and the fuselage fuel coupling. However on the Cardinal that; when in > doubt I ask "what would Cessna do" just as with Vans, flexible lines > are kept to a minimum and used only where absolutely necessary. > > In the Cardinal fuel system, there are NO flexible lines. In the > Cardinal electro-hydraulic gear system there are only four short > flexible lines at the nose and main gear actuators. In the > retractable gear Cardinal, the brake line in the main gear is a solid > line. A the top of the RG brake line is a solid mechanical swivel > fitting and only on the lower portion by the wheel is a short easily > replaced flexible line used--remember this is a retractable gear > aircraft. > > The point in all this is that hard lines ARE the standard in the > certified and military world in most areas and flexible lines are the > exception. Flexible lines are used only where hard lines are > impractical or expensive such as the movable mechanical (banjo type) > fluid connectors. > > Just an alternative $0.02. > > William > N237VX > > > On Jul 9, 2011, at 10:25, Kelly McMullen wrote: > >> --> RV10-List message posted by: Kelly McMullen >> >> Van's would consider adding flex lines about the same time as they >> consider stocking the correct nose wheel. They won't change the nose >> wheel even though the correct one is exactly the same price. Flex >> lines could add over $100 to the cost, especially if you include flex >> lines in place of the crummy nylon lines in the cabin. Somehow we have >> been deluded into wanting durability similar to certified >> aircraft................what a crazy idea. >> >> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:06 PM, E& T Andrews wrote: >> Vans should consider including the >>> flexible hose lines in the RV10 kit... has this been raised with Vans >>> before? >>> >>> all the best >>> >>> Evan Andrews > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 2011
From: Linn Walters <pitts_pilot(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: External Brake Lines - crack
I think the decision ..... flex or hard ..... probably boiled down to weight and cost, and the hard lines win on both counts. Hard line failures on certified aircraft happen..... but mostly with many, many hours on them. I have no data, but I'd bet money on the RV brake line failures on poor flaring technique, or cheap equipment. Scoring the tubing with the flaring tool clamp is just asking for a stress fracture. For me it's really difficult to get a flare I'm happy with. I had to clean up my Rolo-Flair dies because of marks on the tubing. Linn On 7/9/2011 11:56 PM, William Curtis wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: William Curtis > > Kelly, > > > I beg to differ but in certified aircraft that I am familiar, (Cessna) > flexible lines are used only where absolutely necessary. The > preference by certified aircraft designers is to use hard lines as > much as practicable if only so that there is no life limit on the > line. > > This was driven home to me when I stood on the rear door of a C-17 and > looked up at all the hydraulic plumbing. With all those movable parts > and doors, NOT a single flexible line --not even at the actuators. > Where the line required movement, solid lines with mechanical (banjo > style) flexible fluid couplings were used. I took a picture of it but > I have to find it. > > I know some Pipers use a short flexible line between their fuel tanks > and the fuselage fuel coupling. However on the Cardinal that; when in > doubt I ask "what would Cessna do" just as with Vans, flexible lines > are kept to a minimum and used only where absolutely necessary. > > In the Cardinal fuel system, there are NO flexible lines. In the > Cardinal electro-hydraulic gear system there are only four short > flexible lines at the nose and main gear actuators. In the > retractable gear Cardinal, the brake line in the main gear is a solid > line. A the top of the RG brake line is a solid mechanical swivel > fitting and only on the lower portion by the wheel is a short easily > replaced flexible line used--remember this is a retractable gear > aircraft. > > The point in all this is that hard lines ARE the standard in the > certified and military world in most areas and flexible lines are the > exception. Flexible lines are used only where hard lines are > impractical or expensive such as the movable mechanical (banjo type) > fluid connectors. > > Just an alternative $0.02. > > William > N237VX > > > On Jul 9, 2011, at 10:25, Kelly McMullen wrote: > >> --> RV10-List message posted by: Kelly McMullen >> >> Van's would consider adding flex lines about the same time as they >> consider stocking the correct nose wheel. They won't change the nose >> wheel even though the correct one is exactly the same price. Flex >> lines could add over $100 to the cost, especially if you include flex >> lines in place of the crummy nylon lines in the cabin. Somehow we have >> been deluded into wanting durability similar to certified >> aircraft................what a crazy idea. >> >> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:06 PM, E& T Andrews wrote: >> Vans should consider including the >>> flexible hose lines in the RV10 kit... has this been raised with Vans >>> before? >>> >>> all the best >>> >>> Evan Andrews > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 2011
Subject: Re: External Brake Lines - crack
From: William Curtis <wwc4(at)njit.edu>
Kelly, I think we are all in agreement that the 3003 versa tube is crap and 5052 would be much better. Also, when I said NO flexible lines are used in the Cardinal fuel system, I meant from the firewall back. Naturally, firewall forward is one place where flexible lines are standard. William ----------- On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Linn Walters wrote: > > I think the decision ..... flex or hard ..... probably boiled down to > weight and cost, and the hard lines win on both counts. > Hard line failures on certified aircraft happen..... but mostly with many, > many hours on them. I have no data, but I'd bet money on the RV brake line > failures on poor flaring technique, or cheap equipment. Scoring the tubing > with the flaring tool clamp is just asking for a stress fracture. For me > it's really difficult to get a flare I'm happy with. I had to clean up my > Rolo-Flair dies because of marks on the tubing. > Linn > > > On 7/9/2011 11:56 PM, William Curtis wrote: > >> --> RV10-List message posted by: William Curtis >> >> Kelly, >> >> >> I beg to differ but in certified aircraft that I am familiar, (Cessna) >> flexible lines are used only where absolutely necessary. The >> preference by certified aircraft designers is to use hard lines as >> much as practicable if only so that there is no life limit on the >> line. >> >> This was driven home to me when I stood on the rear door of a C-17 and >> looked up at all the hydraulic plumbing. With all those movable parts >> and doors, NOT a single flexible line --not even at the actuators. >> Where the line required movement, solid lines with mechanical (banjo >> style) flexible fluid couplings were used. I took a picture of it but >> I have to find it. >> >> I know some Pipers use a short flexible line between their fuel tanks >> and the fuselage fuel coupling. However on the Cardinal that; when in >> doubt I ask "what would Cessna do" just as with Vans, flexible lines >> are kept to a minimum and used only where absolutely necessary. >> >> In the Cardinal fuel system, there are NO flexible lines. In the >> Cardinal electro-hydraulic gear system there are only four short >> flexible lines at the nose and main gear actuators. In the >> retractable gear Cardinal, the brake line in the main gear is a solid >> line. A the top of the RG brake line is a solid mechanical swivel >> fitting and only on the lower portion by the wheel is a short easily >> replaced flexible line used--remember this is a retractable gear >> aircraft. >> >> The point in all this is that hard lines ARE the standard in the >> certified and military world in most areas and flexible lines are the >> exception. Flexible lines are used only where hard lines are >> impractical or expensive such as the movable mechanical (banjo type) >> fluid connectors. >> >> Just an alternative $0.02. >> >> William >> N237VX >> >> >> On Jul 9, 2011, at 10:25, Kelly McMullen wrote: >> >> --> RV10-List message posted by: Kelly McMullen >>> >>> Van's would consider adding flex lines about the same time as they >>> consider stocking the correct nose wheel. They won't change the nose >>> wheel even though the correct one is exactly the same price. Flex >>> lines could add over $100 to the cost, especially if you include flex >>> lines in place of the crummy nylon lines in the cabin. Somehow we have >>> been deluded into wanting durability similar to certified >>> aircraft................what a crazy idea. >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:06 PM, E& T Andrews>> au > wrote: >>> Vans should consider including the >>> >>>> flexible hose lines in the RV10 kit... has this been raised with Vans >>>> before? >>>> >>>> all the best >>>> >>>> Evan Andrews >>>> >>> ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 09, 2011
Subject: Re: External Brake Lines - crack
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Understand. The Cardinal is a bit unique among Cessnas, with its construction and design. Many planes use short flex lines between wing tanks and hard lines in fuselage, for easy disconnect and absorbing wing flex. IIRC those swivel joints for the RG are a bit of a maintenance pain, although they don't need frequent attention. The brake flex lines on my Mooney are a piece of cake. Every 10-15 years when they get hard, just remove, make new lines and reinstall. They get significant flex every time the gear goes up or down. Just comes down to using good quality material with design that can give with flex without work hardening. Obviously builder's choice of what they want to use. On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 9:50 PM, William Curtis wrote: > Kelly, > > I think we are all in agreement that the 3003 versa tube is crap and 5052 > would be much better. Also, when I said NO flexible lines are used in the > Cardinal fuel system, I meant from the firewall back. Naturally, firewall > forward is one place where flexible lines are standard. > > William > ----------- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Scott Schmidt <scottmschmidt(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Big Sky Air Race
Date: Jul 09, 2011
The airport is at 4080 ft. Max power was 25 inches and I ran between 2500 and 2600 RPM. Fuel flow was 19-20 gph and I flew 500-1000 ft agl. -Scott Sent from my iPhone On Jul 9, 2011, at 9:06 PM, Robin Marks wrote: > Scott, > > What general engine settings are you flying in a race like that. MP (max I assume), RPM? At what ALT is the race conducted plus fuel burn when racing? > > > > Thanks, > > Robin > > > > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@ matronics.com] On Behalf Of Scott Schmidt > Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 6:51 PM > To: RV-10 List > Subject: RV10-List: Big Sky Air Race > > > > Sean and I just got back from Three Forks, Montana and had a great time ru nning in the race up there today. We represented our RV-10 group pretty goo d, I think. > > There were about 30 planes running in the race and the weather was perfect , the Sacajawea Hotel there is great with a very good restaurant and they di d a good job organizing everything. > > If you are ever in the area it would be a fun place to stop over for a nig ht and enjoy the quaint town and small town airport. > > It was a 126nm course and pretty flat. > > > > Sean's plane is still very new and I was surprised at how close we both we re but we do have the same engine and prop. He is still breaking in the eng ine and we have some tweaking to do on the ailerons. > > I averaged 204.6 mph and Sean was 203.8. > > I don't have all the results but the -10 was right there and sometimes fas ter than the -6's, -7's and -8's. > > I'll do it again. > > > Scott Schmidt > > > > > ==== > RV10-List Email Forum - > Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, > w.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV 1 > ====================== > m">http://forums.matronics.com > http://www.matronics.com/contribution > ====================== > > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Phillips" <pietflyr(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: External Brake Lines - crack
Date: Jul 10, 2011
Yet even Cessna hard lines can have problems. My Cessna 140 brake lines cracked and leaked at the top of the landing gear strut and had to be replaced. Of course, this was after over 4000 hours and 53 years of service, the last two of which were flying off a rough grass field. I do think that the key is using 5052 tubing rather than 3003 - 5052 has significantly higher fatigue strength. It is also critical to make good smooth flares without over flaring. Jack Phillips #40610 Wings -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of William Curtis Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 11:56 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: External Brake Lines - crack Kelly, I beg to differ but in certified aircraft that I am familiar, (Cessna) flexible lines are used only where absolutely necessary. The preference by certified aircraft designers is to use hard lines as much as practicable if only so that there is no life limit on the line. This was driven home to me when I stood on the rear door of a C-17 and looked up at all the hydraulic plumbing. With all those movable parts and doors, NOT a single flexible line --not even at the actuators. Where the line required movement, solid lines with mechanical (banjo style) flexible fluid couplings were used. I took a picture of it but I have to find it. I know some Pipers use a short flexible line between their fuel tanks and the fuselage fuel coupling. However on the Cardinal that; when in doubt I ask "what would Cessna do" just as with Vans, flexible lines are kept to a minimum and used only where absolutely necessary. In the Cardinal fuel system, there are NO flexible lines. In the Cardinal electro-hydraulic gear system there are only four short flexible lines at the nose and main gear actuators. In the retractable gear Cardinal, the brake line in the main gear is a solid line. A the top of the RG brake line is a solid mechanical swivel fitting and only on the lower portion by the wheel is a short easily replaced flexible line used--remember this is a retractable gear aircraft. The point in all this is that hard lines ARE the standard in the certified and military world in most areas and flexible lines are the exception. Flexible lines are used only where hard lines are impractical or expensive such as the movable mechanical (banjo type) fluid connectors. Just an alternative $0.02. William N237VX On Jul 9, 2011, at 10:25, Kelly McMullen wrote: > > Van's would consider adding flex lines about the same time as they > consider stocking the correct nose wheel. They won't change the nose > wheel even though the correct one is exactly the same price. Flex > lines could add over $100 to the cost, especially if you include flex > lines in place of the crummy nylon lines in the cabin. Somehow we have > been deluded into wanting durability similar to certified > aircraft................what a crazy idea. > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:06 PM, E & T Andrews wrote: > Vans should consider including the >> flexible hose lines in the RV10 kit... has this been raised with Vans >> before? >> >> all the best >> >> Evan Andrews ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Big Sky Air Race
From: "Strasnuts" <sean(at)braunandco.com>
Date: Jul 10, 2011
They updated the speeds from a miscalculation and now they are showing Scott averaged 211.91 mph Sean averaged 211.08 mph I thought second wasn't that bad until I realized Scott was the only other one in my class! -------- 40936 RV-10 SB N801VR Flying Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345824#345824 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 10, 2011
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Big Sky Air Race
Given the factory performance spec for 2200 gross, top speed is 211, I'd say you are right there. http://www.vansaircraft.com/public/rv-10per.htm On 7/10/2011 4:54 PM, Strasnuts wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: "Strasnuts" > > They updated the speeds from a miscalculation and now they are showing Scott averaged 211.91 mph > Sean averaged 211.08 mph > > I thought second wasn't that bad until I realized Scott was the only other one in my class! > > -------- > 40936 > RV-10 SB N801VR Flying > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345824#345824 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Dave Saylor <dave.saylor.aircrafters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Jul 10, 2011
Subject: Re: Big Sky Air Race
Sounds like fun. How do they judge the course? People on the ground? GPS trackers? I'm just wondering what strategy works best for the turns. Are there official rules somewhere? My wife flies the Hayward Air Rally every year. The rule book is pretty detailed. Dave Saylor AirCrafters 140 Aviation Way Watsonville, CA 95076 831-722-9141 Shop 831-750-0284 Cell On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Strasnuts wrote: > > They updated the speeds from a miscalculation and now they are showing Scott averaged 211.91 mph > Sean averaged 211.08 mph > > I thought second wasn't that bad until I realized Scott was the only other one in my class! > > -------- > 40936 > RV-10 SB N801VR Flying > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345824#345824 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Seano" <sean(at)braunandco.com>
Subject: Re: Big Sky Air Race
Date: Jul 10, 2011
They had 3 or 4 spots setup with spotters and wouldn't tell us which ones had them. They did a good job showing pictures of the turn sites and GPS coordinates. Once we were flying we used the GPS for the track and referenced the pics to get us over the right landmark. It made it easy. Having TCAS was great to see exactly where the plane in front and behind was. I passed an RV7 who was placed between Scott and me. Here is a link to their website. http://bigskyairrace.org/BSAR/The_Race.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Saylor" <dave.saylor.aircrafters(at)gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 6:57 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Big Sky Air Race > > > Sounds like fun. How do they judge the course? People on the ground? > GPS trackers? I'm just wondering what strategy works best for the > turns. > > Are there official rules somewhere? > > My wife flies the Hayward Air Rally every year. The rule book is > pretty detailed. > > Dave Saylor > AirCrafters > 140 Aviation Way > Watsonville, CA 95076 > 831-722-9141 Shop > 831-750-0284 Cell > > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Strasnuts wrote: >> >> They updated the speeds from a miscalculation and now they are showing >> Scott averaged 211.91 mph >> Sean averaged 211.08 mph >> >> I thought second wasn't that bad until I realized Scott was the only >> other one in my class! >> >> -------- >> 40936 >> RV-10 SB N801VR Flying >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345824#345824 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Dave Saylor <dave.saylor.aircrafters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Jul 10, 2011
Subject: Re: Big Sky Air Race
Nice. We'll have to give it a try. Thanks! Dave Saylor AirCrafters 140 Aviation Way Watsonville, CA 95076 831-722-9141 Shop 831-750-0284 Cell On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Seano wrote: > > They had 3 or 4 spots setup with spotters and wouldn't tell us which ones > had them. They did a good job showing pictures of the turn sites and GPS > coordinates. Once we were flying we used the GPS for the track and > referenced the pics to get us over the right landmark. It made it easy. > Having TCAS was great to see exactly where the plane in front and behind > was. I passed an RV7 who was placed between Scott and me. Here is a link > to their website. > > http://bigskyairrace.org/BSAR/The_Race.html > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Saylor" > > To: > Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 6:57 PM > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Big Sky Air Race > > >> >> >> Sounds like fun. How do they judge the course? People on the ground? >> GPS trackers? I'm just wondering what strategy works best for the >> turns. >> >> Are there official rules somewhere? >> >> My wife flies the Hayward Air Rally every year. The rule book is >> pretty detailed. >> >> Dave Saylor >> AirCrafters >> 140 Aviation Way >> Watsonville, CA 95076 >> 831-722-9141Shop >> 831-750-0284Cell >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Strasnuts wrote: >>> >>> >>> They updated the speeds from a miscalculation and now they are showing >>> Scott averaged 211.91 mph >>> Sean averaged 211.08 mph >>> >>> I thought second wasn't that bad until I realized Scott was the only >>> other one in my class! >>> >>> -------- >>> 40936 >>> RV-10 SB N801VR Flying >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Read this topic online here: >>> >>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345824#345824 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Date: Jul 10, 2011
Subject: Re: Big Sky Air Race
I am stunned at how close you two are when considering ALL the variables. I assume general piloting skills could make several MPH difference alone. What that difference percentage wise a third of one percent? >> Scott averaged 211.91 mph >> Sean averaged 211.08 mph Did you guys just go racing or did you tape up the gaps & seams. I assume flying solo, low fuel and all that? As Bill would sign off Robin "dreaming of formation flight but love hearing about racing" Marks -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Seano Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 8:36 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Big Sky Air Race They had 3 or 4 spots setup with spotters and wouldn't tell us which ones had them. They did a good job showing pictures of the turn sites and GPS coordinates. Once we were flying we used the GPS for the track and referenced the pics to get us over the right landmark. It made it easy. Having TCAS was great to see exactly where the plane in front and behind was. I passed an RV7 who was placed between Scott and me. Here is a link to their website. http://bigskyairrace.org/BSAR/The_Race.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Saylor" <dave.saylor.aircrafters(at)gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 6:57 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Big Sky Air Race > > > Sounds like fun. How do they judge the course? People on the ground? > GPS trackers? I'm just wondering what strategy works best for the > turns. > > Are there official rules somewhere? > > My wife flies the Hayward Air Rally every year. The rule book is > pretty detailed. > > Dave Saylor > AirCrafters > 140 Aviation Way > Watsonville, CA 95076 > 831-722-9141 Shop > 831-750-0284 Cell > > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Strasnuts wrote: >> >> They updated the speeds from a miscalculation and now they are showing >> Scott averaged 211.91 mph >> Sean averaged 211.08 mph >> >> I thought second wasn't that bad until I realized Scott was the only >> other one in my class! >> >> -------- >> 40936 >> RV-10 SB N801VR Flying >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345824#345824 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Scott Schmidt <scottmschmidt(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Big Sky Air Race
Date: Jul 10, 2011
Since I trained Sean in the RV-10 I would expect about the same results......we were trying to decide who is the "wingman" while we were up there. No taping or anything. I flew the same as I do any day I fly. I even had my bags and tools in the back. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 10, 2011, at 10:30 PM, Robin Marks wrote: > > I am stunned at how close you two are when considering ALL the variables. I > assume general piloting skills could make several MPH difference alone. What > that difference percentage wise a third of one percent? >>> Scott averaged 211.91 mph >>> Sean averaged 211.08 mph > Did you guys just go racing or did you tape up the gaps & seams. I assume > flying solo, low fuel and all that? > > As Bill would sign off > > Robin "dreaming of formation flight but love hearing about racing" Marks > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Seano > Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 8:36 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Big Sky Air Race > > > They had 3 or 4 spots setup with spotters and wouldn't tell us which ones > had them. They did a good job showing pictures of the turn sites and GPS > coordinates. Once we were flying we used the GPS for the track and > referenced the pics to get us over the right landmark. It made it easy. > Having TCAS was great to see exactly where the plane in front and behind > was. I passed an RV7 who was placed between Scott and me. Here is a link > to their website. > > http://bigskyairrace.org/BSAR/The_Race.html > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dave Saylor" <dave.saylor.aircrafters(at)gmail.com> > To: > Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 6:57 PM > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Big Sky Air Race > > >> >> >> Sounds like fun. How do they judge the course? People on the ground? >> GPS trackers? I'm just wondering what strategy works best for the >> turns. >> >> Are there official rules somewhere? >> >> My wife flies the Hayward Air Rally every year. The rule book is >> pretty detailed. >> >> Dave Saylor >> AirCrafters >> 140 Aviation Way >> Watsonville, CA 95076 >> 831-722-9141 Shop >> 831-750-0284 Cell >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Strasnuts wrote: >>> >>> They updated the speeds from a miscalculation and now they are showing >>> Scott averaged 211.91 mph >>> Sean averaged 211.08 mph >>> >>> I thought second wasn't that bad until I realized Scott was the only >>> other one in my class! >>> >>> -------- >>> 40936 >>> RV-10 SB N801VR Flying >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Read this topic online here: >>> >>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345824#345824 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Scott Schmidt <scottmschmidt(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Big Sky Air Race
Date: Jul 11, 2011
I really think my average speed was closer to 204mph for the race if we took out the tailwind we had. The majority of the time my TAS was right around 177knots. When we started the race we had a good tailwind going north and my GS was around 230 mph and then southbound I dropped lower and didn't have the same headwind. Either way I had not pushed the plane like that and measured my speeds. I am usually just climbing up and setting a nice cruise power setting. I was actually surprised at how the RV-10 compared with the -7's and -8's and there was one Bonanza that was there that ran 1 mph faster than us. I will forward the actual results. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 10, 2011, at 11:31 PM, Scott Schmidt wrote: > > Since I trained Sean in the RV-10 I would expect about the same results......we were trying to decide who is the "wingman" while we were up there. > > No taping or anything. I flew the same as I do any day I fly. I even had my bags and tools in the back. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jul 10, 2011, at 10:30 PM, Robin Marks wrote: > >> >> I am stunned at how close you two are when considering ALL the variables. I >> assume general piloting skills could make several MPH difference alone. What >> that difference percentage wise a third of one percent? >>>> Scott averaged 211.91 mph >>>> Sean averaged 211.08 mph >> Did you guys just go racing or did you tape up the gaps & seams. I assume >> flying solo, low fuel and all that? >> >> As Bill would sign off >> >> Robin "dreaming of formation flight but love hearing about racing" Marks >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Seano >> Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 8:36 PM >> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Big Sky Air Race >> >> >> They had 3 or 4 spots setup with spotters and wouldn't tell us which ones >> had them. They did a good job showing pictures of the turn sites and GPS >> coordinates. Once we were flying we used the GPS for the track and >> referenced the pics to get us over the right landmark. It made it easy. >> Having TCAS was great to see exactly where the plane in front and behind >> was. I passed an RV7 who was placed between Scott and me. Here is a link >> to their website. >> >> http://bigskyairrace.org/BSAR/The_Race.html >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Dave Saylor" <dave.saylor.aircrafters(at)gmail.com> >> To: >> Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 6:57 PM >> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Big Sky Air Race >> >> >>> >>> >>> Sounds like fun. How do they judge the course? People on the ground? >>> GPS trackers? I'm just wondering what strategy works best for the >>> turns. >>> >>> Are there official rules somewhere? >>> >>> My wife flies the Hayward Air Rally every year. The rule book is >>> pretty detailed. >>> >>> Dave Saylor >>> AirCrafters >>> 140 Aviation Way >>> Watsonville, CA 95076 >>> 831-722-9141 Shop >>> 831-750-0284 Cell >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Strasnuts wrote: >>>> >>>> They updated the speeds from a miscalculation and now they are showing >>>> Scott averaged 211.91 mph >>>> Sean averaged 211.08 mph >>>> >>>> I thought second wasn't that bad until I realized Scott was the only >>>> other one in my class! >>>> >>>> -------- >>>> 40936 >>>> RV-10 SB N801VR Flying >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Read this topic online here: >>>> >>>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=345824#345824 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >


June 22, 2011 - July 11, 2011

RV10-Archive.digest.vol-ig