RV10-Archive.digest.vol-kd

August 30, 2014 - September 21, 2014



      >>> 1) Connected in the B-Lead (to measure the output of the ALT).
      >>> 
      >>> 2) Connected to the battery (to measure the load on the battery; but it m
      isses the contributions of electrons coming from the ALT to the main buss.)
      >>> 
      >>> Location 3 seems to be the most logical spot for me.
      >>> 
      >>> 3) Immediately before the main buss.  So the ALT and Battery can be send
      ing electrons to the buss and I'll be measuring them before they enter the b
      uss as they're consumed.  Then I'm getting a measurement of true load (minus
       the start).
      >>> 
      >>> 
      >>> Where have most of you installed yours?  I really like option 3 but want
       to make sure I'm not missing something.  I'm also curious to know where you
      rs is installed? I'm thinking of putting it on the aft side of the sub panel
      , so I can yank a G3X screen and access it.
      >>> 
      >>> Thanks,
      >>> Phil
      >>> 
      >>> 
      >>> 
      >>> 
      >>> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
      D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      
      >>> List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
      >>> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
      D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      
      >>> //forums.matronics.com
      >>> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
      D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      
      >>> ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      >>> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
      D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      
      >>> 
      >> 
      >> 
      >> get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
      >> tp://forums.matronics.com
      >> _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      >> 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
      D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
      D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
      D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
      D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      > 
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 30, 2014
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Shunt - Location
You really only have two choices. Either between Alternator and buss, or between starter relay and buss. The latter tells you what you expect, positive charge or discharge. You would have difficulty connecting between battery and starter relay because it is #4 wire, requiring bigger terminals than the shunt is intended to take, and I don't think any shunt is designed for over 100 amps, while starter pulls 2-3 times that. So your #2 and #3 necessarily have to be the same place and probably will be your choice. On 8/30/2014 8:33 AM, Phillip Perry wrote: > Good feedback so far. > > Jessie, on your position, I assume it's inline and handles the start > without any issue. (That's where Garmin suggests) > > What do you actually see on your digital readouts? Do you see 0 Amps > on a charged battery and typically -1 or so inflight? > > I'm just trying to understand the difference between what would be > seen monitoring a batteries charge vs monitoring a load at the buss input. > > Very helpful stuff everyone.... Keep the thoughts coming please. > > Phil > > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Jesse Saint > wrote: > > I prefer to know what my battery is doing. If it goes more than a > couple of amps negative with the engine running, then you have > problems. Also, right after start you will see 25+ amps positive > which is a great indication that your alternator is working well > enough to recharge your battery while powering the bus. Knowing > what the bus is drawing is good for load shedding, but that's all. > The one from the alternator is good too, so you will know if it > isn't putting out amperage. > > The battery info is my favorite and most informative one. > > Jesse Saint > I-TEC, Inc. > jesse(at)itecusa.org > www.itecusa.org <http://www.itecusa.org> > www.mavericklsa.com <http://www.mavericklsa.com> > C: 352-427-0285 > O: 352-465-4545 > F: 815-377-3694 > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug 30, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Phillip Perry > wrote: > >> Last night I was thinking about shunt locations and it seems like >> there are 3 different electrical locations for it. >> >> 1) Connected in the B-Lead (to measure the output of the ALT). >> >> 2) Connected to the battery (to measure the load on the battery; >> but it misses the contributions of electrons coming from the ALT >> to the main buss.) >> >> Location 3 seems to be the most logical spot for me. >> >> 3) Immediately before the main buss. So the ALT and Battery can >> be sending electrons to the buss and I'll be measuring them >> before they enter the buss as they're consumed. Then I'm getting >> a measurement of true load (minus the start). >> >> >> Where have most of you installed yours? I really like option 3 >> but want to make sure I'm not missing something. I'm also >> curious to know where yours is installed? I'm thinking of putting >> it on the aft side of the sub panel, so I can yank a G3X screen >> and access it. >> >> Thanks, >> Phil >> >> >> * >> >> D============================================ >> List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> D============================================ >> //forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com> >> D============================================ >> ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> D============================================ >> >> * > > * > > get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > tp://forums.matronics.com > _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > * > > > * > > > * ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 30, 2014
Subject: Re: Shunt - Location
From: Phillip Perry <philperry9(at)gmail.com>
I'm not sure that's true and it's part of what I'm wrestling with..... This is a direct quote from the G3X installation manual and from this text, it leads me to believe that it could be placed anywhere in the #2 wire and it would read the charge or discharge rates of that battery. Am I missing something? An alternator ammeter shunt should be installed inline in the alternator output (=9CB=9D terminal). *A battery ammeter shunt should be i nstalled between the battery positive terminal and the battery contactor.* Depending on the location of the alternator or battery relative to its supported electrical bus, it is typically desirable to install the shunt on the firewall near where the alternator or battery output would normally penetrate the firewall. On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote : > > You really only have two choices. Either between Alternator and buss, or > between starter relay and buss. The latter tells you what you expect, > positive charge or discharge. You would have difficulty connecting betwee n > battery and starter relay because it is #4 wire, requiring bigger termina ls > than the shunt is intended to take, and I don't think any shunt is design ed > for over 100 amps, while starter pulls 2-3 times that. So your #2 and #3 > necessarily have to be the same place and probably will be your choice. > > On 8/30/2014 8:33 AM, Phillip Perry wrote: > >> Good feedback so far. >> >> Jessie, on your position, I assume it's inline and handles the start >> without any issue. (That's where Garmin suggests) >> >> What do you actually see on your digital readouts? Do you see 0 Amps on >> a charged battery and typically -1 or so inflight? >> >> I'm just trying to understand the difference between what would be seen >> monitoring a batteries charge vs monitoring a load at the buss input. >> >> Very helpful stuff everyone.... Keep the thoughts coming please. >> >> Phil >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Jesse Saint > > wrote: >> >> I prefer to know what my battery is doing. If it goes more than a >> couple of amps negative with the engine running, then you have >> problems. Also, right after start you will see 25+ amps positive >> which is a great indication that your alternator is working well >> enough to recharge your battery while powering the bus. Knowing >> what the bus is drawing is good for load shedding, but that's all. >> The one from the alternator is good too, so you will know if it >> isn't putting out amperage. >> >> The battery info is my favorite and most informative one. >> >> Jesse Saint >> I-TEC, Inc. >> jesse(at)itecusa.org >> www.itecusa.org <http://www.itecusa.org> >> www.mavericklsa.com <http://www.mavericklsa.com> >> C: 352-427-0285 >> O: 352-465-4545 >> F: 815-377-3694 >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Aug 30, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Phillip Perry > > wrote: >> >> Last night I was thinking about shunt locations and it seems like >>> there are 3 different electrical locations for it. >>> >>> 1) Connected in the B-Lead (to measure the output of the ALT). >>> >>> 2) Connected to the battery (to measure the load on the battery; >>> but it misses the contributions of electrons coming from the ALT >>> to the main buss.) >>> >>> Location 3 seems to be the most logical spot for me. >>> >>> 3) Immediately before the main buss. So the ALT and Battery can >>> be sending electrons to the buss and I'll be measuring them >>> before they enter the buss as they're consumed. Then I'm getting >>> a measurement of true load (minus the start). >>> >>> >>> Where have most of you installed yours? I really like option 3 >>> but want to make sure I'm not missing something. I'm also >>> curious to know where yours is installed? I'm thinking of putting >>> it on the aft side of the sub panel, so I can yank a G3X screen >>> and access it. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Phil >>> >>> >>> * >>> >>> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >>> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> //forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com> >>> >>> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >>> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> >>> * >>> >> >> * >> >> get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> tp://forums.matronics.com >> _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> >> * >> >> >> * >> >> >> * >> > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 30, 2014
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Shunt - Location
I suppose there might be some aircraft with battery on the firewall where you might do that, but it makes no sense. What information are you going to get by having the shunt at the battery? So you have a shunt that can handle the current, it will have less resolution of low current movement. (all shunts are designed for 0-50mv, where 50 mv equals full scale). The only current you see at the battery besides what goes to the buss is the starter and anything else that you bypass the buss for some reason. You really don't want to be splicing #2 or #4 wire to install a shunt. #8 from starter relay to the buss will tell you all the information you want. I don't have a clue why Garmin wrote that. I'm not aware of any certified aircraft that do it that way. On 8/30/2014 5:32 PM, Phillip Perry wrote: > I'm not sure that's true and it's part of what I'm wrestling with..... > This is a direct quote from the G3X installation manual and from this > text, it leads me to believe that it could be placed anywhere in the > #2 wire and it would read the charge or discharge rates of that > battery. Am I missing something? > > An alternator ammeter shunt should be installed inline in the > alternator output (B terminal). */A battery ammeter shunt should > be installed between the battery positive terminal and the battery > contactor./* Depending on the location of the alternator or > battery relative to its supported electrical bus, it is typically > desirable to install the shunt on the firewall near where the > alternator or battery output would normally penetrate the firewall. > > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kelly McMullen > wrote: > > > > > You really only have two choices. Either between Alternator and > buss, or between starter relay and buss. The latter tells you what > you expect, positive charge or discharge. You would have > difficulty connecting between battery and starter relay because it > is #4 wire, requiring bigger terminals than the shunt is intended > to take, and I don't think any shunt is designed for over 100 > amps, while starter pulls 2-3 times that. So your #2 and #3 > necessarily have to be the same place and probably will be your > choice. > > On 8/30/2014 8:33 AM, Phillip Perry wrote: > > Good feedback so far. > > Jessie, on your position, I assume it's inline and handles the > start without any issue. (That's where Garmin suggests) > > What do you actually see on your digital readouts? Do you see > 0 Amps on a charged battery and typically -1 or so inflight? > > I'm just trying to understand the difference between what > would be seen monitoring a batteries charge vs monitoring a > load at the buss input. > > Very helpful stuff everyone.... Keep the thoughts coming please. > > Phil > > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Jesse Saint > > >> wrote: > > I prefer to know what my battery is doing. If it goes more > than a > couple of amps negative with the engine running, then you have > problems. Also, right after start you will see 25+ amps > positive > which is a great indication that your alternator is > working well > enough to recharge your battery while powering the bus. > Knowing > what the bus is drawing is good for load shedding, but > that's all. > The one from the alternator is good too, so you will know > if it > isn't putting out amperage. > > The battery info is my favorite and most informative one. > > Jesse Saint > I-TEC, Inc. > jesse(at)itecusa.org > > > www.itecusa.org <http://www.itecusa.org> > www.mavericklsa.com <http://www.mavericklsa.com> > <http://www.mavericklsa.com> > C: 352-427-0285 > > O: 352-465-4545 > > F: 815-377-3694 > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug 30, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Phillip Perry > > >> wrote: > > Last night I was thinking about shunt locations and it > seems like > there are 3 different electrical locations for it. > > 1) Connected in the B-Lead (to measure the output of > the ALT). > > 2) Connected to the battery (to measure the load on > the battery; > but it misses the contributions of electrons coming > from the ALT > to the main buss.) > > Location 3 seems to be the most logical spot for me. > > 3) Immediately before the main buss. So the ALT and > Battery can > be sending electrons to the buss and I'll be measuring > them > before they enter the buss as they're consumed. Then > I'm getting > a measurement of true load (minus the start). > > > Where have most of you installed yours? I really like > option 3 > but want to make sure I'm not missing something. I'm also > curious to know where yours is installed? I'm thinking > of putting > it on the aft side of the sub panel, so I can yank a > G3X screen > and access it. > > Thanks, > Phil > > > * > > > D============================================ > List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > > D============================================ > //forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com> > <http://forums.matronics.com> > > > D============================================ > ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > D============================================ > > * > > > * > > get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > tp://forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com> > _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > * > > > * > > > * > > > =================================== > -List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > =================================== > FORUMS - > _blank">http://forums.matronics.com > =================================== > b Site - > -Matt Dralle, List Admin. > target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > =================================== > > > * > > > * ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 30, 2014
From: Linn Walters <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Shunt - Location
If the #2 wire goes to the starter solenoid and the buss is connected to that same point with #8 then the shunt can be placed in the #8 line and not carry starter current. Then the shunt will read the charge current minus the load current. It all depends on what data you're interested in. I want to know the health of my alternator and my battery ..... I don't care what the 'load' is. Putting the shunt in the buss to battery link gives me what I am looking for. Also, a voltmeter .... seems like every accessory has one in it .... will tell you the other half of the data you should have. I agree with Kelly .... you don't want anything in that #2 cable between the battery and the starter .... except the starter solenoid and master solenoid. Anyway a 300+A shunt is pricey. Linn On 8/30/2014 8:32 PM, Phillip Perry wrote: > I'm not sure that's true and it's part of what I'm wrestling with..... > This is a direct quote from the G3X installation manual and from this > text, it leads me to believe that it could be placed anywhere in the > #2 wire and it would read the charge or discharge rates of that > battery. Am I missing something? > > An alternator ammeter shunt should be installed inline in the > alternator output (B terminal). */A battery ammeter shunt should > be installed between the battery positive terminal and the battery > contactor./* Depending on the location of the alternator or > battery relative to its supported electrical bus, it is typically > desirable to install the shunt on the firewall near where the > alternator or battery output would normally penetrate the firewall. > > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kelly McMullen > wrote: > > > > > You really only have two choices. Either between Alternator and > buss, or between starter relay and buss. The latter tells you what > you expect, positive charge or discharge. You would have > difficulty connecting between battery and starter relay because it > is #4 wire, requiring bigger terminals than the shunt is intended > to take, and I don't think any shunt is designed for over 100 > amps, while starter pulls 2-3 times that. So your #2 and #3 > necessarily have to be the same place and probably will be your > choice. > > On 8/30/2014 8:33 AM, Phillip Perry wrote: > > Good feedback so far. > > Jessie, on your position, I assume it's inline and handles the > start without any issue. (That's where Garmin suggests) > > What do you actually see on your digital readouts? Do you see > 0 Amps on a charged battery and typically -1 or so inflight? > > I'm just trying to understand the difference between what > would be seen monitoring a batteries charge vs monitoring a > load at the buss input. > > Very helpful stuff everyone.... Keep the thoughts coming please. > > Phil > > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Jesse Saint > > >> wrote: > > I prefer to know what my battery is doing. If it goes more > than a > couple of amps negative with the engine running, then you have > problems. Also, right after start you will see 25+ amps > positive > which is a great indication that your alternator is > working well > enough to recharge your battery while powering the bus. > Knowing > what the bus is drawing is good for load shedding, but > that's all. > The one from the alternator is good too, so you will know > if it > isn't putting out amperage. > > The battery info is my favorite and most informative one. > > Jesse Saint > I-TEC, Inc. > jesse(at)itecusa.org > > > www.itecusa.org <http://www.itecusa.org> > www.mavericklsa.com <http://www.mavericklsa.com> > <http://www.mavericklsa.com> > C: 352-427-0285 > > O: 352-465-4545 > > F: 815-377-3694 > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug 30, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Phillip Perry > > >> wrote: > > Last night I was thinking about shunt locations and it > seems like > there are 3 different electrical locations for it. > > 1) Connected in the B-Lead (to measure the output of > the ALT). > > 2) Connected to the battery (to measure the load on > the battery; > but it misses the contributions of electrons coming > from the ALT > to the main buss.) > > Location 3 seems to be the most logical spot for me. > > 3) Immediately before the main buss. So the ALT and > Battery can > be sending electrons to the buss and I'll be measuring > them > before they enter the buss as they're consumed. Then > I'm getting > a measurement of true load (minus the start). > > > Where have most of you installed yours? I really like > option 3 > but want to make sure I'm not missing something. I'm also > curious to know where yours is installed? I'm thinking > of putting > it on the aft side of the sub panel, so I can yank a > G3X screen > and access it. > > Thanks, > Phil > > > * > > > D============================================ > List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > > D============================================ > //forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com> > <http://forums.matronics.com> > > > D============================================ > ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > D============================================ > > * > > > * > > get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > tp://forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com> > _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > * > > > * > > > * > > > =================================== > -List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > =================================== > FORUMS - > _blank">http://forums.matronics.com > =================================== > b Site - > -Matt Dralle, List Admin. > target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > =================================== > > > * > > > * > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jesse Saint <jesse(at)saintaviation.com>
Subject: Re: Shunt - Location
Date: Aug 30, 2014
I agree. From your earlier email, though, there are actually all 3 choices. You could see how much the bus is using by connecting the alternator to the battery side of the shunt and the bus to the other side. As I mentioned earlier, though, this doesn't give valuable information compared to the other two options. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. 352-427-0285 jesse(at)saintaviation.com Sent from my iPad > On Aug 30, 2014, at 9:04 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > > > I suppose there might be some aircraft with battery on the firewall where you might do that, but it makes no sense. > What information are you going to get by having the shunt at the battery? So you have a shunt that can handle the current, it will have less resolution of low current movement. (all shunts are designed for 0-50mv, where 50 mv equals full scale). The only current you see at the battery besides what goes to the buss is the starter and anything else that you bypass the buss for some reason. > You really don't want to be splicing #2 or #4 wire to install a shunt. #8 from starter relay to the buss will tell you all the information you want. > I don't have a clue why Garmin wrote that. I'm not aware of any certified aircraft that do it that way. > >> On 8/30/2014 5:32 PM, Phillip Perry wrote: >> I'm not sure that's true and it's part of what I'm wrestling with..... This is a direct quote from the G3X installation manual and from this text, it leads me to believe that it could be placed anywhere in the #2 wire and it would read the charge or discharge rates of that battery. Am I missing something? >> >> An alternator ammeter shunt should be installed inline in the >> alternator output (B terminal). */A battery ammeter shunt should >> be installed between the battery positive terminal and the battery >> contactor./* Depending on the location of the alternator or >> battery relative to its supported electrical bus, it is typically >> desirable to install the shunt on the firewall near where the >> alternator or battery output would normally penetrate the firewall. >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kelly McMullen > wrote: >> >> > >> >> You really only have two choices. Either between Alternator and >> buss, or between starter relay and buss. The latter tells you what >> you expect, positive charge or discharge. You would have >> difficulty connecting between battery and starter relay because it >> is #4 wire, requiring bigger terminals than the shunt is intended >> to take, and I don't think any shunt is designed for over 100 >> amps, while starter pulls 2-3 times that. So your #2 and #3 >> necessarily have to be the same place and probably will be your >> choice. >> >> On 8/30/2014 8:33 AM, Phillip Perry wrote: >> >> Good feedback so far. >> >> Jessie, on your position, I assume it's inline and handles the >> start without any issue. (That's where Garmin suggests) >> >> What do you actually see on your digital readouts? Do you see >> 0 Amps on a charged battery and typically -1 or so inflight? >> >> I'm just trying to understand the difference between what >> would be seen monitoring a batteries charge vs monitoring a >> load at the buss input. >> >> Very helpful stuff everyone.... Keep the thoughts coming please. >> >> Phil >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Jesse Saint >> >> > >> wrote: >> >> I prefer to know what my battery is doing. If it goes more >> than a >> couple of amps negative with the engine running, then you have >> problems. Also, right after start you will see 25+ amps >> positive >> which is a great indication that your alternator is >> working well >> enough to recharge your battery while powering the bus. >> Knowing >> what the bus is drawing is good for load shedding, but >> that's all. >> The one from the alternator is good too, so you will know >> if it >> isn't putting out amperage. >> >> The battery info is my favorite and most informative one. >> >> Jesse Saint >> I-TEC, Inc. >> jesse(at)itecusa.org >> > >> www.itecusa.org <http://www.itecusa.org> >> www.mavericklsa.com <http://www.mavericklsa.com> >> <http://www.mavericklsa.com> >> C: 352-427-0285 > > >> O: 352-465-4545 > > >> F: 815-377-3694 > > >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Aug 30, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Phillip Perry >> >> > >> wrote: >> >> Last night I was thinking about shunt locations and it >> seems like >> there are 3 different electrical locations for it. >> >> 1) Connected in the B-Lead (to measure the output of >> the ALT). >> >> 2) Connected to the battery (to measure the load on >> the battery; >> but it misses the contributions of electrons coming >> from the ALT >> to the main buss.) >> >> Location 3 seems to be the most logical spot for me. >> >> 3) Immediately before the main buss. So the ALT and >> Battery can >> be sending electrons to the buss and I'll be measuring >> them >> before they enter the buss as they're consumed. Then >> I'm getting >> a measurement of true load (minus the start). >> >> >> Where have most of you installed yours? I really like >> option 3 >> but want to make sure I'm not missing something. I'm also >> curious to know where yours is installed? I'm thinking >> of putting >> it on the aft side of the sub panel, so I can yank a >> G3X screen >> and access it. >> >> Thanks, >> Phil >> >> >> * >> >> D============================================ >> List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> D============================================ >> //forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com> >> <http://forums.matronics.com> >> >> D============================================ >> ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> D============================================ >> >> * >> >> >> * >> >> get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> tp://forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com> >> _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> >> * >> >> >> * >> >> >> * >> >> >> >> =================================== >> -List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> =================================== >> FORUMS - >> _blank">http://forums.matronics.com >> =================================== >> b Site - >> -Matt Dralle, List Admin. >> target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> =================================== >> >> >> >> >> * >> >> >> * > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 30, 2014
Subject: Re: Shunt - Location
From: Phillip Perry <philperry9(at)gmail.com>
I dug my Aeroelectric book out of one of our moving boxes and I'll try to read it with a cup of coffee in the morning. I'm mostly interested in understanding charge or discharge rates. I can build a reference load chart (by running on battery only during a test session) to determine exactly what each piece of equipment pulls and how I might be able to shed load if needed. Phil On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote : > > I suppose there might be some aircraft with battery on the firewall where > you might do that, but it makes no sense. > What information are you going to get by having the shunt at the battery? > So you have a shunt that can handle the current, it will have less > resolution of low current movement. (all shunts are designed for 0-50mv, > where 50 mv equals full scale). The only current you see at the battery > besides what goes to the buss is the starter and anything else that you > bypass the buss for some reason. > You really don't want to be splicing #2 or #4 wire to install a shunt. #8 > from starter relay to the buss will tell you all the information you want . > I don't have a clue why Garmin wrote that. I'm not aware of any certified > aircraft that do it that way. > > > On 8/30/2014 5:32 PM, Phillip Perry wrote: > >> I'm not sure that's true and it's part of what I'm wrestling with..... >> This is a direct quote from the G3X installation manual and from this te xt, >> it leads me to believe that it could be placed anywhere in the #2 wire a nd >> it would read the charge or discharge rates of that battery. Am I missi ng >> something? >> >> An alternator ammeter shunt should be installed inline in the >> alternator output (=9CB=9D terminal). */A battery ammete r shunt should >> >> be installed between the battery positive terminal and the battery >> contactor./* Depending on the location of the alternator or >> >> battery relative to its supported electrical bus, it is typically >> desirable to install the shunt on the firewall near where the >> alternator or battery output would normally penetrate the firewall. >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kelly McMullen > > wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> You really only have two choices. Either between Alternator and >> buss, or between starter relay and buss. The latter tells you what >> you expect, positive charge or discharge. You would have >> difficulty connecting between battery and starter relay because it >> is #4 wire, requiring bigger terminals than the shunt is intended >> to take, and I don't think any shunt is designed for over 100 >> amps, while starter pulls 2-3 times that. So your #2 and #3 >> necessarily have to be the same place and probably will be your >> choice. >> >> On 8/30/2014 8:33 AM, Phillip Perry wrote: >> >> Good feedback so far. >> >> Jessie, on your position, I assume it's inline and handles the >> start without any issue. (That's where Garmin suggests) >> >> What do you actually see on your digital readouts? Do you see >> 0 Amps on a charged battery and typically -1 or so inflight? >> >> I'm just trying to understand the difference between what >> would be seen monitoring a batteries charge vs monitoring a >> load at the buss input. >> >> Very helpful stuff everyone.... Keep the thoughts coming please . >> >> Phil >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Jesse Saint >> >> > >> >> wrote: >> >> I prefer to know what my battery is doing. If it goes more >> than a >> couple of amps negative with the engine running, then you ha ve >> problems. Also, right after start you will see 25+ amps >> positive >> which is a great indication that your alternator is >> working well >> enough to recharge your battery while powering the bus. >> Knowing >> what the bus is drawing is good for load shedding, but >> that's all. >> The one from the alternator is good too, so you will know >> if it >> isn't putting out amperage. >> >> The battery info is my favorite and most informative one. >> >> Jesse Saint >> I-TEC, Inc. >> jesse(at)itecusa.org >> > >> www.itecusa.org <http://www.itecusa.org> >> >> www.mavericklsa.com <http://www.mavericklsa.com> >> <http://www.mavericklsa.com> >> C: 352-427-0285 > > >> O: 352-465-4545 > > >> F: 815-377-3694 > >> > >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Aug 30, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Phillip Perry >> >> > >> >> wrote: >> >> Last night I was thinking about shunt locations and it >> seems like >> there are 3 different electrical locations for it. >> >> 1) Connected in the B-Lead (to measure the output of >> the ALT). >> >> 2) Connected to the battery (to measure the load on >> the battery; >> but it misses the contributions of electrons coming >> from the ALT >> to the main buss.) >> >> Location 3 seems to be the most logical spot for me. >> >> 3) Immediately before the main buss. So the ALT and >> Battery can >> be sending electrons to the buss and I'll be measuring >> them >> before they enter the buss as they're consumed. Then >> I'm getting >> a measurement of true load (minus the start). >> >> >> Where have most of you installed yours? I really like >> option 3 >> but want to make sure I'm not missing something. I'm als o >> curious to know where yours is installed? I'm thinking >> of putting >> it on the aft side of the sub panel, so I can yank a >> G3X screen >> and access it. >> >> Thanks, >> Phil >> >> >> * >> >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D >> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D >> List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D >> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D >> //forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com> >> <http://forums.matronics.com> >> >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D >> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D >> ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D >> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D >> >> * >> >> >> * >> >> get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> tp://forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com> >> >> _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> >> * >> >> >> * >> >> >> * >> >> >> >> ====================== ============= >> -List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Lis t >> ====================== ============= >> FORUMS - >> _blank">http://forums.matronics.com >> ====================== ============= >> b Site - >> -Matt Dralle, List Admin. >> target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> ====================== ============= >> >> >> >> >> * >> >> >> * >> > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 30, 2014
From: Linn Walters <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Shunt - Location
Knowing which piece draws X amps is a good exercise, but what do you do with the data? With modern equipment the load is comparatively small and with the transponder and strobes off a good battery should outlast your fuel supply. Alternator states are typically good charge (depending on battery level) or no charge. A slipping belt will be in-between. Batteries are more insidious .... they fail slowly at first and then gather steam towards useless. A good battery health indicator is the battery voltage just before start ..... how much did it lose since you last flew? I have a desulfator trickle charger that I hook up after each flight so my 'settling time' is rather short. IMHO, of course! Linn On 8/30/2014 9:42 PM, Phillip Perry wrote: > I dug my Aeroelectric book out of one of our moving boxes and I'll try > to read it with a cup of coffee in the morning. > > I'm mostly interested in understanding charge or discharge rates. I > can build a reference load chart (by running on battery only during a > test session) to determine exactly what each piece of equipment pulls > and how I might be able to shed load if needed. > > Phil > > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Kelly McMullen > wrote: > > > > > I suppose there might be some aircraft with battery on the > firewall where you might do that, but it makes no sense. > What information are you going to get by having the shunt at the > battery? So you have a shunt that can handle the current, it will > have less resolution of low current movement. (all shunts are > designed for 0-50mv, where 50 mv equals full scale). The only > current you see at the battery besides what goes to the buss is > the starter and anything else that you bypass the buss for some > reason. > You really don't want to be splicing #2 or #4 wire to install a > shunt. #8 from starter relay to the buss will tell you all the > information you want. > I don't have a clue why Garmin wrote that. I'm not aware of any > certified aircraft that do it that way. > > > On 8/30/2014 5:32 PM, Phillip Perry wrote: > > I'm not sure that's true and it's part of what I'm wrestling > with..... This is a direct quote from the G3X installation > manual and from this text, it leads me to believe that it > could be placed anywhere in the #2 wire and it would read the > charge or discharge rates of that battery. Am I missing > something? > > An alternator ammeter shunt should be installed inline in the > alternator output (B terminal). */A battery ammeter > shunt should > > be installed between the battery positive terminal and the > battery > contactor./* Depending on the location of the alternator or > > battery relative to its supported electrical bus, it is > typically > desirable to install the shunt on the firewall near where the > alternator or battery output would normally penetrate the > firewall. > > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kelly McMullen > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > You really only have two choices. Either between > Alternator and > buss, or between starter relay and buss. The latter tells > you what > you expect, positive charge or discharge. You would have > difficulty connecting between battery and starter relay > because it > is #4 wire, requiring bigger terminals than the shunt is > intended > to take, and I don't think any shunt is designed for over 100 > amps, while starter pulls 2-3 times that. So your #2 and #3 > necessarily have to be the same place and probably will be > your > choice. > > On 8/30/2014 8:33 AM, Phillip Perry wrote: > > Good feedback so far. > > Jessie, on your position, I assume it's inline and > handles the > start without any issue. (That's where Garmin suggests) > > What do you actually see on your digital readouts? Do > you see > 0 Amps on a charged battery and typically -1 or so > inflight? > > I'm just trying to understand the difference between what > would be seen monitoring a batteries charge vs > monitoring a > load at the buss input. > > Very helpful stuff everyone.... Keep the thoughts > coming please. > > Phil > > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Jesse Saint > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > I prefer to know what my battery is doing. If it > goes more > than a > couple of amps negative with the engine running, > then you have > problems. Also, right after start you will see 25+ > amps > positive > which is a great indication that your alternator is > working well > enough to recharge your battery while powering the > bus. > Knowing > what the bus is drawing is good for load shedding, but > that's all. > The one from the alternator is good too, so you > will know > if it > isn't putting out amperage. > > The battery info is my favorite and most > informative one. > > Jesse Saint > I-TEC, Inc. > jesse(at)itecusa.org > > > > >> > www.itecusa.org <http://www.itecusa.org> > <http://www.itecusa.org> > > www.mavericklsa.com <http://www.mavericklsa.com> > <http://www.mavericklsa.com> > <http://www.mavericklsa.com> > C: 352-427-0285 > > > >> > O: 352-465-4545 > > > >> > F: 815-377-3694 > > > > >> > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug 30, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Phillip Perry > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > Last night I was thinking about shunt > locations and it > seems like > there are 3 different electrical locations for it. > > 1) Connected in the B-Lead (to measure the > output of > the ALT). > > 2) Connected to the battery (to measure the > load on > the battery; > but it misses the contributions of electrons > coming > from the ALT > to the main buss.) > > Location 3 seems to be the most logical spot > for me. > > 3) Immediately before the main buss. So the > ALT and > Battery can > be sending electrons to the buss and I'll be > measuring > them > before they enter the buss as they're > consumed. Then > I'm getting > a measurement of true load (minus the start). > > > Where have most of you installed yours? I > really like > option 3 > but want to make sure I'm not missing > something. I'm also > curious to know where yours is installed? I'm > thinking > of putting > it on the aft side of the sub panel, so I can > yank a > G3X screen > and access it. > > Thanks, > Phil > > > * > > D============================================ > > List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > D============================================ > //forums.matronics.com > <http://forums.matronics.com> > <http://forums.matronics.com> > > D============================================ > ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > D============================================ > > * > > > * > > > get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > tp://forums.matronics.com > <http://forums.matronics.com> > > _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > * > > > * > > > * > > > =================================== > -List" > target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > =================================== > FORUMS - > _blank">http://forums.matronics.com > =================================== > b Site - > -Matt Dralle, List Admin. > target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > =================================== > > > * > > > * > > > =================================== > -List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > =================================== > FORUMS - > _blank">http://forums.matronics.com > =================================== > b Site - > -Matt Dralle, List Admin. > target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > =================================== > > > * > > > * > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 30, 2014
Subject: Re: Shunt - Location
From: Phillip Perry <philperry9(at)gmail.com>
I think I just sorted it out in my head. I was thinking that the #8 B-Lead, #2 Battery, and #8 Buss feed wires would all bind at the battery-side post of the starter solenoid. This would mean I have a single feed to the 'real' buss bar. I'm now 99% sure that's not the case. I need to look at it closer, but I believe I've got a connection for the B-Lead on one end of the buss and on the other end of the buss I have a battery connection. That makes perfect sense when someone says to put it "in the battery lead". I won't be back at the hangar until Tuesday, but I'm pretty sure I just figured it out. Sometimes I'm dense! Phil On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Linn Walters wrote : > Knowing which piece draws X amps is a good exercise, but what do you do > with the data? With modern equipment the load is comparatively small and > with the transponder and strobes off a good battery should outlast your > fuel supply. > > Alternator states are typically good charge (depending on battery level) > or no charge. A slipping belt will be in-between. Batteries are more > insidious .... they fail slowly at first and then gather steam towards > useless. A good battery health indicator is the battery voltage just > before start ..... how much did it lose since you last flew? I have a > desulfator trickle charger that I hook up after each flight so my 'settli ng > time' is rather short. > IMHO, of course! > Linn > > > On 8/30/2014 9:42 PM, Phillip Perry wrote: > > I dug my Aeroelectric book out of one of our moving boxes and I'll try to > read it with a cup of coffee in the morning. > > I'm mostly interested in understanding charge or discharge rates. I can > build a reference load chart (by running on battery only during a test > session) to determine exactly what each piece of equipment pulls and how I > might be able to shed load if needed. > > Phil > > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Kelly McMullen > wrote: > >> >> I suppose there might be some aircraft with battery on the firewall >> where you might do that, but it makes no sense. >> What information are you going to get by having the shunt at the battery ? >> So you have a shunt that can handle the current, it will have less >> resolution of low current movement. (all shunts are designed for 0-50mv, >> where 50 mv equals full scale). The only current you see at the battery >> besides what goes to the buss is the starter and anything else that you >> bypass the buss for some reason. >> You really don't want to be splicing #2 or #4 wire to install a shunt. # 8 >> from starter relay to the buss will tell you all the information you wan t. >> I don't have a clue why Garmin wrote that. I'm not aware of any certifie d >> aircraft that do it that way. >> >> >> On 8/30/2014 5:32 PM, Phillip Perry wrote: >> >>> I'm not sure that's true and it's part of what I'm wrestling with..... >>> This is a direct quote from the G3X installation manual and from this t ext, >>> it leads me to believe that it could be placed anywhere in the #2 wire and >>> it would read the charge or discharge rates of that battery. Am I miss ing >>> something? >>> >>> An alternator ammeter shunt should be installed inline in the >>> alternator output (=9CB=9D terminal). */A battery amme ter shunt should >>> >>> be installed between the battery positive terminal and the battery >>> contactor./* Depending on the location of the alternator or >>> >>> battery relative to its supported electrical bus, it is typically >>> desirable to install the shunt on the firewall near where the >>> alternator or battery output would normally penetrate the firewall. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kelly McMullen >> > wrote: >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> You really only have two choices. Either between Alternator and >>> buss, or between starter relay and buss. The latter tells you what >>> you expect, positive charge or discharge. You would have >>> difficulty connecting between battery and starter relay because it >>> is #4 wire, requiring bigger terminals than the shunt is intended >>> to take, and I don't think any shunt is designed for over 100 >>> amps, while starter pulls 2-3 times that. So your #2 and #3 >>> necessarily have to be the same place and probably will be your >>> choice. >>> >>> On 8/30/2014 8:33 AM, Phillip Perry wrote: >>> >>> Good feedback so far. >>> >>> Jessie, on your position, I assume it's inline and handles the >>> start without any issue. (That's where Garmin suggests) >>> >>> What do you actually see on your digital readouts? Do you see >>> 0 Amps on a charged battery and typically -1 or so inflight? >>> >>> I'm just trying to understand the difference between what >>> would be seen monitoring a batteries charge vs monitoring a >>> load at the buss input. >>> >>> Very helpful stuff everyone.... Keep the thoughts coming pleas e. >>> >>> Phil >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Jesse Saint >>> >>> >> >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> I prefer to know what my battery is doing. If it goes more >>> than a >>> couple of amps negative with the engine running, then you >>> have >>> problems. Also, right after start you will see 25+ amps >>> positive >>> which is a great indication that your alternator is >>> working well >>> enough to recharge your battery while powering the bus. >>> Knowing >>> what the bus is drawing is good for load shedding, but >>> that's all. >>> The one from the alternator is good too, so you will know >>> if it >>> isn't putting out amperage. >>> >>> The battery info is my favorite and most informative one. >>> >>> Jesse Saint >>> I-TEC, Inc. >>> jesse(at)itecusa.org >>> > >>> www.itecusa.org <http://www.itecusa.org> >>> >>> >>> www.mavericklsa.com <http://www.mavericklsa.com> >>> <http://www.mavericklsa.com> >>> C: 352-427-0285 >> > >>> O: 352-465-4545 >> > >>> F: 815-377-3694 >> >>> > >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Aug 30, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Phillip Perry >>> >>> >> >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> Last night I was thinking about shunt locations and it >>> seems like >>> there are 3 different electrical locations for it. >>> >>> 1) Connected in the B-Lead (to measure the output of >>> the ALT). >>> >>> 2) Connected to the battery (to measure the load on >>> the battery; >>> but it misses the contributions of electrons coming >>> from the ALT >>> to the main buss.) >>> >>> Location 3 seems to be the most logical spot for me. >>> >>> 3) Immediately before the main buss. So the ALT and >>> Battery can >>> be sending electrons to the buss and I'll be measuring >>> them >>> before they enter the buss as they're consumed. Then >>> I'm getting >>> a measurement of true load (minus the start). >>> >>> >>> Where have most of you installed yours? I really like >>> option 3 >>> but want to make sure I'm not missing something. I'm al so >>> curious to know where yours is installed? I'm thinking >>> of putting >>> it on the aft side of the sub panel, so I can yank a >>> G3X screen >>> and access it. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Phil >>> >>> >>> * >>> >>> >>> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D >>> List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >>> >>> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D >>> //forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com> >>> <http://forums.matronics.com> >>> >>> >>> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D >>> ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >>> >>> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D >>> >>> * >>> >>> >>> * >>> >>> get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >>> tp://forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com> >>> >>> _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >>> >>> * >>> >>> >>> * >>> >>> >>> * >>> >>> >>> >>> ====================== ============= >>> -List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Li st >>> ====================== ============= >>> FORUMS - >>> _blank">http://forums.matronics.com >>> ====================== ============= >>> b Site - >>> -Matt Dralle, List Admin. >>> target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >>> ====================== ============= >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> * >>> >>> >>> * >>> >> >> >> ======================== =========== >> -List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> ======================== =========== >> FORUMS - >> _blank">http://forums.matronics.com >> ======================== =========== >> b Site - >> -Matt Dralle, List Admin. >> target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> ======================== =========== >> >> >> >> > > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > 08/30/14 > > > * > =========== onics.com/Navigator?RV10-List> =========== =========== om/contribution> =========== > > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Undercarriage
From: Patrick Pulis <rv10free2fly(at)yahoo.com.au>
Date: Aug 31, 2014
Oh bugger! Warm regards Patrick > On 29 Aug 2014, at 20:16, Rodger Todd wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > If you haven't seen this on Vansairforce.net I strongly suggest you read h ttp://www.vansairforce.com/community/showthread.php?t=116171 > > What Dave Brown has reported is greatly worrying. > > Best wishes to all, > > Rodger > > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 30, 2014
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Shunt - Location
Yes, that is what you want. One more failure state to an alternator that wasn't mentioned, is the failure of one or two diodes. That will result in an alternator that will produce 10-20 amps, but no more. You would see it as a small discharge on your battery, and not going to 25+ amps right after start as it should. (similar to loose and slipping belt results) Otherwise, you will have full alt output or no output in most cases. On 8/30/2014 7:20 PM, Phillip Perry wrote: > I think I just sorted it out in my head. I was thinking that the #8 > B-Lead, #2 Battery, *and #8 Buss feed wires* would all bind at the > battery-side post of the starter solenoid. This would mean I have a > single feed to the 'real' buss bar. It also means you are are seeing the entire system except for the starter draw, and will know whether the battery is being charged or discharged. > > I'm now 99% sure that's not the case. I need to look at it closer, > but I believe I've got a connection for the B-Lead on one end of the > buss and on the other end of the buss I have a battery connection. > That makes perfect sense when someone says to put it "in the battery > lead". > > I won't be back at the hangar until Tuesday, but I'm pretty sure I > just figured it out. Sometimes I'm dense! > > Phil > > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Linn Walters > wrote: > > Knowing which piece draws X amps is a good exercise, but what do > you do with the data? With modern equipment the load is > comparatively small and with the transponder and strobes off a > good battery should outlast your fuel supply. > > Alternator states are typically good charge (depending on battery > level) or no charge. A slipping belt will be in-between. > Batteries are more insidious .... they fail slowly at first and > then gather steam towards useless. A good battery health indicator > is the battery voltage just before start ..... how much did it > lose since you last flew? I have a desulfator trickle charger > that I hook up after each flight so my 'settling time' is rather > short. > IMHO, of course! > Linn > > > On 8/30/2014 9:42 PM, Phillip Perry wrote: >> I dug my Aeroelectric book out of one of our moving boxes and >> I'll try to read it with a cup of coffee in the morning. >> >> I'm mostly interested in understanding charge or discharge rates. >> I can build a reference load chart (by running on battery only >> during a test session) to determine exactly what each piece of >> equipment pulls and how I might be able to shed load if needed. >> >> Phil >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Kelly McMullen >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> I suppose there might be some aircraft with battery on the >> firewall where you might do that, but it makes no sense. >> What information are you going to get by having the shunt at >> the battery? So you have a shunt that can handle the current, >> it will have less resolution of low current movement. (all >> shunts are designed for 0-50mv, where 50 mv equals full >> scale). The only current you see at the battery besides what >> goes to the buss is the starter and anything else that you >> bypass the buss for some reason. >> You really don't want to be splicing #2 or #4 wire to install >> a shunt. #8 from starter relay to the buss will tell you all >> the information you want. >> I don't have a clue why Garmin wrote that. I'm not aware of >> any certified aircraft that do it that way. >> >> >> On 8/30/2014 5:32 PM, Phillip Perry wrote: >> >> I'm not sure that's true and it's part of what I'm >> wrestling with..... This is a direct quote from the G3X >> installation manual and from this text, it leads me to >> believe that it could be placed anywhere in the #2 wire >> and it would read the charge or discharge rates of that >> battery. Am I missing something? >> >> An alternator ammeter shunt should be installed >> inline in the >> alternator output (B terminal). */A battery ammeter >> shunt should >> >> be installed between the battery positive terminal >> and the battery >> contactor./* Depending on the location of the >> alternator or >> >> battery relative to its supported electrical bus, it >> is typically >> desirable to install the shunt on the firewall near >> where the >> alternator or battery output would normally penetrate >> the firewall. >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kelly McMullen >> >> > >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> You really only have two choices. Either between >> Alternator and >> buss, or between starter relay and buss. The latter >> tells you what >> you expect, positive charge or discharge. You would have >> difficulty connecting between battery and starter >> relay because it >> is #4 wire, requiring bigger terminals than the shunt >> is intended >> to take, and I don't think any shunt is designed for >> over 100 >> amps, while starter pulls 2-3 times that. So your #2 >> and #3 >> necessarily have to be the same place and probably >> will be your >> choice. >> >> On 8/30/2014 8:33 AM, Phillip Perry wrote: >> >> Good feedback so far. >> >> Jessie, on your position, I assume it's inline >> and handles the >> start without any issue. (That's where Garmin >> suggests) >> >> What do you actually see on your digital >> readouts? Do you see >> 0 Amps on a charged battery and typically -1 or >> so inflight? >> >> I'm just trying to understand the difference >> between what >> would be seen monitoring a batteries charge vs >> monitoring a >> load at the buss input. >> >> Very helpful stuff everyone.... Keep the thoughts >> coming please. >> >> Phil >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Jesse Saint >> > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>> wrote: >> >> I prefer to know what my battery is doing. If >> it goes more >> than a >> couple of amps negative with the engine >> running, then you have >> problems. Also, right after start you will >> see 25+ amps >> positive >> which is a great indication that your >> alternator is >> working well >> enough to recharge your battery while >> powering the bus. >> Knowing >> what the bus is drawing is good for load >> shedding, but >> that's all. >> The one from the alternator is good too, so >> you will know >> if it >> isn't putting out amperage. >> >> The battery info is my favorite and most >> informative one. >> >> Jesse Saint >> I-TEC, Inc. >> jesse(at)itecusa.org >> > >> > > >> >> www.itecusa.org <http://www.itecusa.org> >> <http://www.itecusa.org> >> >> www.mavericklsa.com <http://www.mavericklsa.com> >> <http://www.mavericklsa.com> >> <http://www.mavericklsa.com> >> C: 352-427-0285 >> > > >> >> >> O: 352-465-4545 >> > > >> >> >> F: 815-377-3694 >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Aug 30, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Phillip Perry >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >>> wrote: >> >> Last night I was thinking about shunt >> locations and it >> seems like >> there are 3 different electrical >> locations for it. >> >> 1) Connected in the B-Lead (to measure >> the output of >> the ALT). >> >> 2) Connected to the battery (to measure >> the load on >> the battery; >> but it misses the contributions of >> electrons coming >> from the ALT >> to the main buss.) >> >> Location 3 seems to be the most logical >> spot for me. >> >> 3) Immediately before the main buss. So >> the ALT and >> Battery can >> be sending electrons to the buss and I'll >> be measuring >> them >> before they enter the buss as they're >> consumed. Then >> I'm getting >> a measurement of true load (minus the start). >> >> >> Where have most of you installed yours? >> I really like >> option 3 >> but want to make sure I'm not missing >> something. I'm also >> curious to know where yours is installed? >> I'm thinking >> of putting >> it on the aft side of the sub panel, so I >> can yank a >> G3X screen >> and access it. >> >> Thanks, >> Phil >> >> >> * >> >> D============================================ >> >> List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> D============================================ >> //forums.matronics.com >> <http://forums.matronics.com> >> <http://forums.matronics.com> >> >> D============================================ >> ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> D============================================ >> >> * >> >> >> * >> >> >> get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> tp://forums.matronics.com >> <http://forums.matronics.com> >> >> _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> >> * >> >> >> * >> >> >> * >> >> >> >> =================================== >> -List" >> target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> =================================== >> FORUMS - >> _blank">http://forums.matronics.com >> =================================== >> b Site - >> -Matt Dralle, List Admin. >> target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> =================================== >> >> >> >> >> * >> >> >> * >> >> >> >> =================================== >> -List" >> target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> =================================== >> FORUMS - >> _blank">http://forums.matronics.com >> =================================== >> b Site - >> -Matt Dralle, List Admin. >> target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> =================================== >> >> >> >> >> * >> >> >> * >> >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> >> 08/30/14 >> > > * > > get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > tp://forums.matronics.com > _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution * > > > * > > > * ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 30, 2014
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Undercarriage
Inspected mine today, more as an exercise in determining how much effort it will take to install the doubler. Did see there was a little interference between top shock disk and the rear tubes, so that will get eliminated before I reassemble. I just used engine hoist to lift nose after I had compressed disks by jacking under tail tiedown, removed retaining bolt, then removed jack to allow tail to go down. Not a lot of work, could have waited to first condition inspection, but I decided I wanted to get the doubler before any problem shows up, as I sure wouldn't want to have to remove the engine mount to have it weld repaired. On 8/30/2014 8:26 PM, Patrick Pulis wrote: > Oh bugger! > > Warm regards > > Patrick > > On 29 Aug 2014, at 20:16, Rodger Todd > wrote: > >> Hi Folks, >> >> If you haven't seen this on Vansairforce.net >> <http://Vansairforce.net> I strongly suggest you read >> http://www.vansairforce.com/community/showthread.php?t=116171 >> >> What Dave Brown has reported is greatly worrying. >> >> Best wishes to all, >> >> Rodger >> * >> >> >> * > * > > > * ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Shunt - Location
From: "rv10flyer" <wayne.gillispie(at)gmail.com>
Date: Aug 30, 2014
I have three hall effect current sensors on my GRT. Main Bat feed , Aux Bat feed and Alt feed. A toggle can be switched between the Bat and Alt sensors. Does Garmin not work with the hall effect type sensors? -------- Wayne G. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=429669#429669 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2014
Subject: Re: Shunt - Location
From: Phillip Perry <philperry9(at)gmail.com>
The toggle switch on a pair of hall effect sensors is a good idea The Garmin does work with them but I already own a pair of shunts. And at this point in the project, I'll take advantage of the stuff I own and try to keep from spending any more money than I have to. Phil On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 11:32 PM, rv10flyer wrote: > > I have three hall effect current sensors on my GRT. Main Bat feed , Aux > Bat feed and Alt feed. A toggle can be switched between the Bat and Alt > sensors. Does Garmin not work with the hall effect type sensors? > > -------- > Wayne G. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=429669#429669 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: SB 2014-08-29
From: "Barry" <blmarzaa(at)gmail.com>
Date: Aug 31, 2014
Two thoughts 1. With the WD-1001K-MOD doubler installed it looks like there will be more clearence so the metal plates of the elastomers may clear the support tubes 2. With the added thickness of the doubler, you may need fewer U-1002 washers to take up the slack. I wonder if three washers will still be the max allowed Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=429679#429679 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2014
Subject: Re: Shunt - Location
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
So put one shunt on the alternator B+ line and one one the starter relay to buss line and you will know both what the battery is providing and what the alternator is providing. On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Phillip Perry wrote: > The toggle switch on a pair of hall effect sensors is a good idea > > The Garmin does work with them but I already own a pair of shunts. And at > this point in the project, I'll take advantage of the stuff I own and try > to keep from spending any more money than I have to. > > Phil > > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 11:32 PM, rv10flyer > wrote: > >> >> I have three hall effect current sensors on my GRT. Main Bat feed , Aux >> Bat feed and Alt feed. A toggle can be switched between the Bat and Alt >> sensors. Does Garmin not work with the hall effect type sensors? >> >> -------- >> Wayne G. >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=429669#429669 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ========== >> -List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> ========== >> FORUMS - >> _blank">http://forums.matronics.com >> ========== >> b Site - >> -Matt Dralle, List Admin. >> target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> ========== >> >> >> >> > * > > > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2014
Subject: Re: SB 2014-08-29
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Interesting points. I looked at whether I would need an additional washer as my nose gear and engine have been mounted for more than a year. So far it is fine with the original one washer, and the double will add more compression. My -10 has been in my Aridzona uncooled hangar all of its life. On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Barry wrote: > > Two thoughts > > 1. With the WD-1001K-MOD doubler installed it looks like there will be > more clearence so the metal plates of the elastomers may clear the support > tubes > > 2. With the added thickness of the doubler, you may need fewer U-1002 > washers to take up the slack. I wonder if three washers will still be the > max allowed > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=429679#429679 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DLM" <dlm34077(at)cox.net>
Subject: SB
Date: Aug 31, 2014
How many aircraft have cracks? ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Shunt - Location
From: "bill.peyton" <peyton.b(at)sbcglobal.net>
Date: Aug 31, 2014
You are over thing it. The shunt should always be place on the output lead of the alternator. The aircraft does not run on the battery, it derives it's power from the alternator. The only time the battery is used in the aircraft, or an automobile for that manner, is when you start the engine, or if the alternator fails. The bus voltage can be used to trigger the g3x to provide you a warning and also a status if the alternator fails. I. Addition, the plane power alternators have a separate lead that you can hook up to an indicator light on the panel to indicate an alternator failure. In summary, you should be monitoring the current being drawn from the alternator, and set up the G3x to alarm you during overcurrent and under current situations. You should also set up a voltage level alarm for over voltage and under voltage on both your primary and secondary battery. In addition, you should have a load shed plan in case of the alternator failure. Use this plane to de-power the high current unnecessary items on the bus. -------- Bill WA0SYV Aviation Partners, LLC Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=429687#429687 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <lewgall(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: SB
Date: Aug 31, 2014
Just checked Wes=99s N620EB an hour ago. No cracks, some normal wear, top metal part of top doughnut is bent where it hits the aft braces. 5+ yrs. flying, a couple of pretty hard nose landings, not many grass landings. REALLY appreciate the catch. Later, =93 Lew From: DLM Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 10:40 AM Subject: RV10-List: SB How many aircraft have cracks? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Subject: Re: SB 2014-08-29
Date: Aug 31, 2014
I was thinking exactly the same things. I think you're right. Tim > On Aug 31, 2014, at 9:07 AM, "Barry" wrote: > > > Two thoughts > > 1. With the WD-1001K-MOD doubler installed it looks like there will be more clearence so the metal plates of the elastomers may clear the support tubes > > 2. With the added thickness of the doubler, you may need fewer U-1002 washers to take up the slack. I wonder if three washers will still be the max allowed > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=429679#429679 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Shunt - Location
From: "woxofswa" <woxof(at)aol.com>
Date: Aug 31, 2014
Wiring the traditional way of consumptive drain on the battery still gives a lot of info options. With everything running, the meter will still spike with new items energized as a back up indication that the wizzie is getting power. You can also get the draw of individual items by checking them with the ALT off. That is nice to be able to check and note during construction or adding new items. (I used a ground power plug during construction). Obviously that is usually done on the ground with the engine not running, but it doesn't have to be. I know there is controversy about turning the alt off with the engine running, but Socata used to have just such a check as part of the run up. If you need to know the total draw on the ALT, turning it off (after batt has been start replenished). -------- Myron Nelson Mesa, AZ Flew May 10 2014 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=429698#429698 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Justin Jones <jmjones2000(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Shunt - Location
Date: Aug 31, 2014
This is a perfect discussion for the aeroelectric list I'm sure Bob has some insight. I have CC'd the aeroelectric list email address Justin On Aug 30, 2014, at 6:47, Phillip Perry wrote: > Last night I was thinking about shunt locations and it seems like there ar e 3 different electrical locations for it. > > 1) Connected in the B-Lead (to measure the output of the ALT). > > 2) Connected to the battery (to measure the load on the battery; but it mi sses the contributions of electrons coming from the ALT to the main buss.) > > Location 3 seems to be the most logical spot for me. > > 3) Immediately before the main buss. So the ALT and Battery can be sendin g electrons to the buss and I'll be measuring them before they enter the bus s as they're consumed. Then I'm getting a measurement of true load (minus t he start). > > > Where have most of you installed yours? I really like option 3 but want t o make sure I'm not missing something. I'm also curious to know where yours is installed? I'm thinking of putting it on the aft side of the sub panel, s o I can yank a G3X screen and access it. > > Thanks, > Phil > > > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Shunt - Location
From: Justin Jones <jmjones2000(at)mindspring.com>
Date: Aug 31, 2014
Begin forwarded message: > From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com> > Date: August 31, 2014, 16:48:24 AKDT > To: aeroelectric-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Re: RV10-List: Shunt - Location > Reply-To: aeroelectric-list(at)matronics.com > > > On Aug 30, 2014, at 6:47, Phillip Perry wrote: > > Last night I was thinking about shunt locations and it seems like there ar e 3 different electrical locations for it. > > 1) Connected in the B-Lead (to measure the output of the ALT). > > If you're going to measure current anywhere, this is the > FIRST choice . . . I will elaborate later . . . > > 2) Connected to the battery (to measure the load on the battery; but it mi sses the contributions of electrons coming from the ALT to the main buss.) > > This is how it was done on cars and some airplanes for > decades. Useful ONLY to the individual who KNOWS about > how a battery behaves with a lot of electro-whizzies > wrapped around it. Good diagnostic tool but it requires > attention, memory (monitoring of trends) and an understanding > of battery physics. I don't recommend it. > > > 3) Immediately before the main buss. So the ALT and Battery can be sendin g electrons to the buss and I'll be measuring them before they enter the bus s as they're consumed. Then I'm getting a measurement of true load (minus t he start). > > But you KNOW what that number is . . . right? This is > the FIRST task for crafting an electrical system is to > list everything that needs power, separate to appropriate > bus, tabulate the total bus energy needed under various > flight configurations. It's called a Load Analysis and > EVERY TC aircraft is blessed with one. > > You won't find an ammeter in series with any bus structure > on a biz jet . . . ammeters monitor generator loads. > > The PRIMARY electrical system monitor is active notification > of LOW VOLTS. When the light comes on, you look to see if > the alternator is putting out ANYTHING . . . MAYBE it has > popped a diode and is still putting out some energy but > at a reduced rate. You have the option of reducing load > until the light goes out. > > Are we talking actual SHUNTS or Hall-Effect Current Sensors. > If the latter, one sensor can be used to monitor the output > of both alternators in a dual system like Z-12 or Z-13/8 > > > http://tinyurl.com/kgg8nva > > > http://tinyurl.com/ag46m2f > > > Check out any of the architecture figures at > > > http://tinyurl.com/5wxzn7 > > > You will not find an ammeter shunt anywhere except on > the alternator B-leads . . . > > > Your NUMBER ONE tool for dealing with electrical system > malfunction is active notification of low voltage. Your > response to that event should be . . . at most . . . > the repositioning of a couple of switches whereupon you > assume Plan-B for getting comfortably on the ground. > > > If your Plan-B calls for reading displays, flipping > switches, pushing/pulling breakers, fiddling with > fuses and/or WONDERING how long the battery is going > to last . . . then you blew it before your airplane's > first flight. > > > > For the most part, an ammeter is useful for figuring > things out AFTER you get back on the ground. Not having > one available in flight should NOT be a matter of concern. > > Bob . . . > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 31, 2014
Subject: Re: Leaking Tank Blues
From: Rob Kochman <rv10rob(at)gmail.com>
"now that my wings are off for paint" How'd it go removing the wings? I've always thought that would be an enormous pain. On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > I would have thought the gas would be greener on the other side of the > border. 8^) > > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:23 PM, kearney wrote: > >> >> Hi >> >> For the past year or so I have been fighting a weeping tank rivet on the >> top my QB tanks. I tried loctite but that didn't work at all. >> >> Anyway, now that my wings are off for paint, I tried introducing proseal >> through the fuel sender hole. >> >> After some discussion with a local A&P, I decided to drill out the rivet >> and replace it with a Cherry Max. Fortunately the wing was inverted on a >> table so I was able to use a vaccuum to draw out most chips as I drilled >> out the rivet. Next I opened the hole and hand countersunk it. >> >> My concerns were that there would be a few small chips inside the tank as >> well the rivet might not completely seal even when coated in proseal. To >> deal with this, I introduced a couple of a small amount of proseal into the >> hole with a small syringe. I then installed a cherry max rivet that was >> completely coated in proseal. >> >> A quick check today indicates the leak is gone! >> >> Cheers >> >> Les >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=429620#429620 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ========== >> target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> ========== >> ">http://forums.matronics.com >> ========== >> le, List Admin. >> ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> ========== >> >> >> >> > * > > > * > > -- Rob Kochman RV-10 Flying since March 2011 Woodinville, WA http://kochman.net/N819K ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Leaking Tank Blues
From: Les Kearney <kearney(at)shaw.ca>
Date: Aug 31, 2014
Rob Not so much. I used a mallet to ease the bolts out and a couple of lifts to t ake most of the weight off the wings. It was not much more difficult than putting them on. I had quick disconnects for wiring in the wing root so that was trivial. Likewise for the Pitot sta tic lines. That being said, I wouldn't want to do it too often. Cheers Les Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 31, 2014, at 9:22 PM, Rob Kochman wrote: > > "now that my wings are off for paint" > > How'd it go removing the wings? I've always thought that would be an enor mous pain. > > >> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote : >> I would have thought the gas would be greener on the other side of the bo rder. 8^) >> >> >>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:23 PM, kearney wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> For the past year or so I have been fighting a weeping tank rivet on the top my QB tanks. I tried loctite but that didn't work at all. >>> >>> Anyway, now that my wings are off for paint, I tried introducing proseal through the fuel sender hole. >>> >>> After some discussion with a local A&P, I decided to drill out the rivet and replace it with a Cherry Max. Fortunately the wing was inverted on a ta ble so I was able to use a vaccuum to draw out most chips as I drilled out t he rivet. Next I opened the hole and hand countersunk it. >>> >>> My concerns were that there would be a few small chips inside the tank a s well the rivet might not completely seal even when coated in proseal. To d eal with this, I introduced a couple of a small amount of proseal into the h ole with a small syringe. I then installed a cherry max rivet that was compl etely coated in proseal. >>> >>> A quick check today indicates the leak is gone! >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Les >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Read this topic online here: >>> >>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=429620#429620 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ========== >>> target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >>> ========== >>> ">http://forums.matronics.com >>> ========== >>> le, List Admin. >>> ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >>> ========== >> >> >> >> get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> tp://forums.matronics.com >> _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> > > > > -- > Rob Kochman > RV-10 Flying since March 2011 > Woodinville, WA > http://kochman.net/N819K > > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: RV-10 Paint Quantity
From: "fdombroski" <f.dombroski(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Sep 02, 2014
I am ordering paint for the RV-10. Does anyone that used PPG Deltron 2000 know the paint quantity required for the base color and clear coat? Also the quantity of Epoxy Primer needed? Many Thanks, Frank -------- Frank Dombroski RV-10 2.0 N46VT soon to be flying KSMQ Somerset Airport NJ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=429872#429872 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 02, 2014
From: Linn Walters <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: RV-10 Paint Quantity
I really can't answer the question because I'm just getting ready to paint the fuselage. I bought a gallon of Grey primer and a gallon of white from Sherwin Williams Auto Paint. I can buy more as I need it. I do not want to do base/clear coat ..... I look at all the cars with peeling clear coat and think "If the best experienced paint shops can't paint clear coat without it peeling .... what chance do I have of getting it right???" Linn On 9/2/2014 5:43 PM, fdombroski wrote: > > I am ordering paint for the RV-10. Does anyone that used PPG Deltron 2000 know the paint quantity required for the base color and clear coat? > > Also the quantity of Epoxy Primer needed? > > Many Thanks, > Frank > > -------- > Frank Dombroski > RV-10 2.0 N46VT soon to be flying > KSMQ Somerset Airport NJ > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=429872#429872 > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich(at)verizon.net>
Subject: RV-10 Paint Quantity
Date: Sep 02, 2014
PPG base/clear coat is very high quality and forgiving to the amateur painter (like me). I did two planes with this and will do the next one the same. The first plane is now 10 years after painting and still looks like the day it came out of the paint booth. For the RV-10, start with a gallon of PPG DP-40LF primer but you will most likely need another two quarts. Assuming you will do a primary, secondary and then some accents in another color, start with a gallon of primary color, two or three quarts of secondary and one quart of the accent color (get more as needed). You will need two gallons of clear. You will need about four gallons of PPG reducer (get the right one for the temperature that you will be painting). Plan on ~$2500 for materials. I am just 4 miles from a PPG distributor. If you have to order and such then get more to start. Use PPG Alumi Prep with ScotchBrite pads, one good coat of primer, two coats of color, two coats of clear. If you are using a tri coat (like a lot of metallic reds or pearl yellows) do two coats of base, two coats of pearl (or candy) and then two coats of clear. Follow the times listed with the product for flash, recoat, tape and top coat exactly. Paint with the wings, empennage, ailerons, flaps, doors and cowl off. The RV-10 is so big your arm will get tired so be prepared. Paint the wings first as they are the easiest so you get the hang of it. Prep, prime, color and top coat the wings in one weekend, the cowl and doors the next, then empennage and control surfaces, and the fuselage last (the hardest part as it is so big and you get to spend a lot of time on your back). Attached is a homemade air/water separator that did a very nice job for me. Note the water drain valve. Fill the tub with water and ice. Carl -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of fdombroski Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 5:43 PM Subject: RV10-List: RV-10 Paint Quantity I am ordering paint for the RV-10. Does anyone that used PPG Deltron 2000 know the paint quantity required for the base color and clear coat? Also the quantity of Epoxy Primer needed? Many Thanks, Frank -------- Frank Dombroski RV-10 2.0 N46VT soon to be flying KSMQ Somerset Airport NJ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=429872#429872 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 02, 2014
From: Linn Walters <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: RV-10 Paint Quantity
Thanks for the data Carl! More questions on the water separator ...... which is air in and out? Describe the stuff at the bottom of the vertical pipe .... and the drain valve ... that's hidden by the tub. Linn On 9/2/2014 9:38 PM, Carl Froehlich wrote: > PPG base/clear coat is very high quality and forgiving to the amateur > painter (like me). I did two planes with this and will do the next one the > same. The first plane is now 10 years after painting and still looks like > the day it came out of the paint booth. > > For the RV-10, start with a gallon of PPG DP-40LF primer but you will most > likely need another two quarts. Assuming you will do a primary, secondary > and then some accents in another color, start with a gallon of primary > color, two or three quarts of secondary and one quart of the accent color > (get more as needed). You will need two gallons of clear. You will need > about four gallons of PPG reducer (get the right one for the temperature > that you will be painting). Plan on ~$2500 for materials. I am just 4 > miles from a PPG distributor. If you have to order and such then get more > to start. > > Use PPG Alumi Prep with ScotchBrite pads, one good coat of primer, two coats > of color, two coats of clear. If you are using a tri coat (like a lot of > metallic reds or pearl yellows) do two coats of base, two coats of pearl (or > candy) and then two coats of clear. Follow the times listed with the > product for flash, recoat, tape and top coat exactly. > > Paint with the wings, empennage, ailerons, flaps, doors and cowl off. The > RV-10 is so big your arm will get tired so be prepared. Paint the wings > first as they are the easiest so you get the hang of it. Prep, prime, color > and top coat the wings in one weekend, the cowl and doors the next, then > empennage and control surfaces, and the fuselage last (the hardest part as > it is so big and you get to spend a lot of time on your back). > > Attached is a homemade air/water separator that did a very nice job for me. > Note the water drain valve. Fill the tub with water and ice. > > Carl > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of fdombroski > Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 5:43 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: RV-10 Paint Quantity > > > I am ordering paint for the RV-10. Does anyone that used PPG Deltron 2000 > know the paint quantity required for the base color and clear coat? > > Also the quantity of Epoxy Primer needed? > > Many Thanks, > Frank > > -------- > Frank Dombroski > RV-10 2.0 N46VT soon to be flying > KSMQ Somerset Airport NJ > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=429872#429872 > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Aero Composites
From: "chazking" <airplane-lists(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 02, 2014
Weighed the ACS and it's 52.2# with McCauley 4" hub (same size as Hartzell). Hartzell support told me their 2 blade is 52#. No difference between the two, weigh-wise. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=429892#429892 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich(at)verizon.net>
Subject: RV-10 Paint Quantity
Date: Sep 03, 2014
Linn, There are a lot of ways to do this. This example uses a coil of 3/8=94 aluminum tubing from Aircraft Spruce and some standard fittings. The coil shape is maintained by three pieces of wood and tie wraps. The air goes in at the top (red hose). The coil ends at a PVC =93T=94 fitting. The opposite side of the =93T=94 fitting connects via PVC fittings, out a hole in the side of the tub and to the brass drain valve. The top of the =93T=94 fitting goes up out of the water where you see the yellow air out hose connected. I also ran the out hose 6 feet or so vertically so any condensed but still entrained water would drain back down into the PVC pipe. I blew the water out of the tub every hour or so. I made some ice blocks from gallon milk jugs and floated about four of them in the water while painting. When not in use empty the tube as the aluminum coil will corrode if left in water. This water separator was the third in line from my compressor. The first is a 10=92 up run of =BD=94 copper pipe, then a standard air filter, then this. Without this finally water separator I got water at the paint gun. With it I was always dry. Have fun. After painting an RV-10 you will find out why commercial paint shops get so much money for a paint job. Carl From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Linn Walters Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 10:27 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: RV-10 Paint Quantity Thanks for the data Carl! More questions on the water separator ...... which is air in and out? Describe the stuff at the bottom of the vertical pipe .... and the drain valve ... that's hidden by the tub. Linn On 9/2/2014 9:38 PM, Carl Froehlich wrote: PPG base/clear coat is very high quality and forgiving to the amateur painter (like me). I did two planes with this and will do the next one the same. The first plane is now 10 years after painting and still looks like the day it came out of the paint booth. For the RV-10, start with a gallon of PPG DP-40LF primer but you will most likely need another two quarts. Assuming you will do a primary, secondary and then some accents in another color, start with a gallon of primary color, two or three quarts of secondary and one quart of the accent color (get more as needed). You will need two gallons of clear. You will need about four gallons of PPG reducer (get the right one for the temperature that you will be painting). Plan on ~$2500 for materials. I am just 4 miles from a PPG distributor. If you have to order and such then get more to start. Use PPG Alumi Prep with ScotchBrite pads, one good coat of primer, two coats of color, two coats of clear. If you are using a tri coat (like a lot of metallic reds or pearl yellows) do two coats of base, two coats of pearl (or candy) and then two coats of clear. Follow the times listed with the product for flash, recoat, tape and top coat exactly. Paint with the wings, empennage, ailerons, flaps, doors and cowl off. The RV-10 is so big your arm will get tired so be prepared. Paint the wings first as they are the easiest so you get the hang of it. Prep, prime, color and top coat the wings in one weekend, the cowl and doors the next, then empennage and control surfaces, and the fuselage last (the hardest part as it is so big and you get to spend a lot of time on your back). Attached is a homemade air/water separator that did a very nice job for me. Note the water drain valve. Fill the tub with water and ice. Carl -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of fdombroski Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 5:43 PM Subject: RV10-List: RV-10 Paint Quantity I am ordering paint for the RV-10. Does anyone that used PPG Deltron 2000 know the paint quantity required for the base color and clear coat? Also the quantity of Epoxy Primer needed? Many Thanks, Frank -------- Frank Dombroski RV-10 2.0 N46VT soon to be flying KSMQ Somerset Airport NJ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=429872#429872 ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 03, 2014
From: Werner Schneider <glastar(at)gmx.net>
Subject: Re: SB 2014-08-29
On 29.08.2014 21:23, Tim Olson wrote: > > ........ > glue or JB weld or something would be warranted to keep that > plate from spinning. > > I guess I'll know more after I have mine apart and see which > fix I need to perform. > Hi Tim, what is the outcome of your investigation? And did you talk with Van's about "glueing" the new plate to the mount? Cheers Werner ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 03, 2014
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Subject: Re: SB 2014-08-29
Hi, I posted it that same day. The Van's tech team guys were just talking about it when I called. They agree that it should probably be prevented from moving. Either by welding it along the edge, or by proseal or similar to bond it in place. Tim On 9/3/2014 9:05 AM, Werner Schneider wrote: > > > On 29.08.2014 21:23, Tim Olson wrote: >> >> ........ >> glue or JB weld or something would be warranted to keep that >> plate from spinning. >> >> I guess I'll know more after I have mine apart and see which >> fix I need to perform. >> > Hi Tim, > > what is the outcome of your investigation? And did you talk with Van's > about "glueing" the new plate to the mount? > > Cheers Werner > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: SB 2014-08-29
From: Michael Kraus <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net>
Date: Sep 03, 2014
Data point.... 180 hours exclusively off of grass. No cracks. Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 3, 2014, at 10:05 AM, Werner Schneider wrote: > > > >> On 29.08.2014 21:23, Tim Olson wrote: >> >> ........ >> glue or JB weld or something would be warranted to keep that >> plate from spinning. >> >> I guess I'll know more after I have mine apart and see which >> fix I need to perform. > Hi Tim, > > what is the outcome of your investigation? And did you talk with Van's about "glueing" the new plate to the mount? > > Cheers Werner > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 03, 2014
From: Werner Schneider <glastar(at)gmx.net>
Subject: Re: SB 2014-08-29
Thanks for the update on that Tim, I've not seen that posting strange but I know now. I guess there will then be an SB update on that. Cheers Werner On 03.09.2014 16:46, Tim Olson wrote: > > Hi, > I posted it that same day. The Van's tech team > .......... > > Tim > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Carlos Trigo" <trigo(at)mail.telepac.pt>
Subject: SB 2014-08-29
Date: Sep 03, 2014
Hello Werner If you decide to order the parts for this SB, count with1 set for me. Regards Carlos -----Mensagem original----- De: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] Em nome de Werner Schneider Enviada: 3 de setembro de 2014 16:27 Para: rv10-list(at)matronics.com Assunto: Re: RV10-List: SB 2014-08-29 glastar(at)gmx.net> Thanks for the update on that Tim, I've not seen that posting strange but I know now. I guess there will then be an SB update on that. Cheers Werner On 03.09.2014 16:46, Tim Olson wrote: Tim(at)myrv10.com> > > Hi, > I posted it that same day. The Van's tech team .......... > > Tim > > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List http://www.matronics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 03, 2014
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: SB 2014-08-29
I sent email request to Van's support late Friday and had reply yesterday morning. Parts are being supplied free. Just contact them with your builder number. On 9/3/2014 8:45 AM, Carlos Trigo wrote: > > Hello Werner > > If you decide to order the parts for this SB, count with1 set for me. > > Regards > > Carlos > > -----Mensagem original----- > De: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] Em nome de Werner Schneider > Enviada: 3 de setembro de 2014 16:27 > Para: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Assunto: Re: RV10-List: SB 2014-08-29 > > > > > Thanks for the update on that Tim, I've not seen that posting strange > but I know now. > > I guess there will then be an SB update on that. > > Cheers Werner > > On 03.09.2014 16:46, Tim Olson wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > I posted it that same day. The Van's tech team .......... > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > > http://forums.matronics.com > > http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > * > > > * ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 03, 2014
From: Sean Stephens <sean(at)stephensville.com>
Subject: Knocking In Lord Mount at Idle
I am experiencing a "knocking" which sounds kinda like metal on metal in the top right lord mount when the engine is at full idle (~750 RPM) or right at shutdown when the vibration is the most. I took the lord mount off and inspected, but all looks right. Well, there does seem to be a very minute amount of play with the lord mount inside the ears. Took me a while to isolate it to the top right mount, but finally arrived there with and extra pair of hands. Has anyone experienced anything similar to this with their lord mounts? Not sure what is actually causing the knocking sound. One further note is that this knocking sound is not present at greater than idle and the engine is very smooth otherwise. Thanks, -Sean #40303 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Knocking In Lord Mount at Idle
From: Justin Jones <jmjones2000(at)mindspring.com>
Date: Sep 03, 2014
Was it loose at all when you removed it? There should be an insert in there that will rattle around when loose or cracked. On Sep 3, 2014, at 16:26, Sean Stephens wrote: > > I am experiencing a "knocking" which sounds kinda like metal on metal in the top right lord mount when the engine is at full idle (~750 RPM) or right at shutdown when the vibration is the most. I took the lord mount off and inspected, but all looks right. Well, there does seem to be a very minute amount of play with the lord mount inside the ears. > > Took me a while to isolate it to the top right mount, but finally arrived there with and extra pair of hands. > > Has anyone experienced anything similar to this with their lord mounts? Not sure what is actually causing the knocking sound. > > One further note is that this knocking sound is not present at greater than idle and the engine is very smooth otherwise. > > Thanks, > > -Sean #40303 > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 03, 2014
Subject: Re: Knocking In Lord Mount at Idle
From: Phillip Perry <philperry9(at)gmail.com>
I'd try a stethoscope with a long probe on it to isolate it first. They work very well with knocks and cost less than 10 bucks usually. You can find them in just about any parts store, sears, or harbor freight. You certainly want to know that it's not a lifter knocking with low oil pressure (idle or shutdown). But I'd isolate it for sure so I know 100% where it's coming from. Phil On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Justin Jones wrote: > > Was it loose at all when you removed it? There should be an insert in > there that will rattle around when loose or cracked. > > > On Sep 3, 2014, at 16:26, Sean Stephens wrote: > > > > > I am experiencing a "knocking" which sounds kinda like metal on metal in > the top right lord mount when the engine is at full idle (~750 RPM) or > right at shutdown when the vibration is the most. I took the lord mount > off and inspected, but all looks right. Well, there does seem to be a very > minute amount of play with the lord mount inside the ears. > > > > Took me a while to isolate it to the top right mount, but finally > arrived there with and extra pair of hands. > > > > Has anyone experienced anything similar to this with their lord mounts? > Not sure what is actually causing the knocking sound. > > > > One further note is that this knocking sound is not present at greater > than idle and the engine is very smooth otherwise. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Sean #40303 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Gordon <mregoan(at)hispeed.ch>
Subject: Re: Knocking In Lord Mount at Idle
Date: Sep 04, 2014
Hi Sean, If the mounts are old and sagged, or the assembly is off center, additional movement from shutdown vibration can cause the bolt sleeve to knock against the inside bore of the mounts. That should be a metal on rubber contact, but might cause the mount to tap on the bore in the ear giving a metal to metal contact. Good luck with the search. Gordon 41015 Switzerland On 04.09.2014, at 02:57, Justin Jones wrote: > > Was it loose at all when you removed it? There should be an insert in there that will rattle around when loose or cracked. > > > > On Sep 3, 2014, at 16:26, Sean Stephens wrote: > >> >> I am experiencing a "knocking" which sounds kinda like metal on metal in the top right lord mount when the engine is at full idle (~750 RPM) or right at shutdown when the vibration is the most. I took the lord mount off and inspected, but all looks right. Well, there does seem to be a very minute amount of play with the lord mount inside the ears. >> >> Took me a while to isolate it to the top right mount, but finally arrived there with and extra pair of hands. >> >> Has anyone experienced anything similar to this with their lord mounts? Not sure what is actually causing the knocking sound. >> >> One further note is that this knocking sound is not present at greater than idle and the engine is very smooth otherwise. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Sean #40303 >> >> >> >> > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 04, 2014
From: Sean Stephens <sean(at)stephensville.com>
Subject: Re: Knocking In Lord Mount at Idle
I'll check the mount again. From page FF1-5 of the plans... Gordon, the J-3804-20 spacer is supposed to float around inside the J-3804-20 durometer, but may be contacting the inside wall of the durometer? I'll check again to see if there are signs of that happening. Another possibility that I just thought of is that if the hole in the WD-1001 motor mount that the AN7-26 bolt passes through has too much play, then the bolt itself could be rattling in there? The bolt was torqued to ~40 ft. lbs. according to Section 5V. The engine has been hung on the mounts for roughly a year and the engine has about 50 tach hours on it, so hoping it is not because they are old. -Sean > Gordon > September 4, 2014 at 12:55 AM > > Hi Sean, If the mounts are old and sagged, or the assembly is off > center, additional movement from shutdown vibration can cause the bolt > sleeve to knock against the inside bore of the mounts. That should be > a metal on rubber contact, but might cause the mount to tap on the > bore in the ear giving a metal to metal contact. > > Good luck with the search. > > Gordon > 41015 Switzerland > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 04, 2014
From: Flight_Time <lljjss22(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Knocking In Lord Mount at Idle
I had the same problem early on. Found that the through bolt was not tightened/torqued properly. Torqued the bolts on all four mounts and never had the problem again. Jearl Strickland ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Gordon <mregoan(at)hispeed.ch>
Subject: Re: Knocking In Lord Mount at Idle
Date: Sep 04, 2014
Sean, not quite. The spacer and durometers should be clamped as a rigid stack to the engine mount by the bolt if properly torqued. When the engine shakes the durometers deform in shear, allowing the dynafocal engine mount boss to move laterally. There should normally be enough clearance, but if the elastomers are already deformed when static this clearance can be used up. Another thought - perhaps the stack could be loose if the nut is torqued up onto the runout of the bolt thread. I ran into this problem on one of my mounts and added another washer under the nut to prevent it. Gordon On 04.09.2014, at 15:06, Sean Stephens wrote: > > I'll check the mount again. From page FF1-5 of the plans... > > Gordon, the J-3804-20 spacer is supposed to float around inside the J-3804-20 durometer, but may be contacting the inside wall of the durometer? I'll check again to see if there are signs of that happening. Another possibility that I just thought of is that if the hole in the WD-1001 motor mount that the AN7-26 bolt passes through has too much play, then the bolt itself could be rattling in there? The bolt was torqued to ~40 ft. lbs. according to Section 5V. > > The engine has been hung on the mounts for roughly a year and the engine has about 50 tach hours on it, so hoping it is not because they are old. > > -Sean > >> Gordon >> September 4, 2014 at 12:55 AM >> >> Hi Sean, If the mounts are old and sagged, or the assembly is off center, additional movement from shutdown vibration can cause the bolt sleeve to knock against the inside bore of the mounts. That should be a metal on rubber contact, but might cause the mount to tap on the bore in the ear giving a metal to metal contact. >> >> Good luck with the search. >> >> Gordon >> 41015 Switzerland >> >> >> >> >> > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 04, 2014
From: Sean Stephens <sean(at)stephensville.com>
Subject: Re: Knocking In Lord Mount at Idle
Gordon, you are the man. It was indeed because the nut torqued on the bolt thread runout. Added a washer and problem solved. No more knocking. If we ever cross paths I owe you a cold one. Thanks! -Sean > Gordon > September 4, 2014 at 1:44 PM > > Sean, not quite. The spacer and durometers should be clamped as a > rigid stack to the engine mount by the bolt if properly torqued. When > the engine shakes the durometers deform in shear, allowing the > dynafocal engine mount boss to move laterally. There should normally > be enough clearance, but if the elastomers are already deformed when > static this clearance can be used up. > > Another thought - perhaps the stack could be loose if the nut is > torqued up onto the runout of the bolt thread. I ran into this problem > on one of my mounts and added another washer under the nut to prevent it. > > Gordon > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: SB 2014-08-29
From: "Mike Whisky" <rv-10(at)wellenzohn.net>
Date: Sep 06, 2014
Sorry Carlos the order was sent already to Vans. I wasn't aware that you need this. Please send me your details and I can include you in my RV-10 distribution list going forward. To all I think it's more helpful to report cycles from grass rather then flight hours. Kind regards Michael -------- RV-10 builder (flying) #511 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430093#430093 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Acceptable CHT spread
From: "Mike Whisky" <rv-10(at)wellenzohn.net>
Date: Sep 07, 2014
Hi I was wondering what CHT spread is acceptable in cruise. I currently have a spread if 32 between my hottest and coolest cylinder in LOP cruise. I understand that a spread of 0 would be the ultimate goal but what spread do other see in average. Mike -------- RV-10 builder (flying) #511 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430163#430163 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 07, 2014
Subject: Re: Acceptable CHT spread
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Acceptable to whom? I would call your spread very acceptable if it is hottest to coolest. If it were plus or minus 30 some degrees I might try to get it a bit closer, but many certified planes are no better than that. If you can get the EGT's to peak within 0.5gph or less, then CHT differences are going to mostly depend on baffling caused airflow differences. They can be fine tuned with the dams in front of #1 and #2 cylinders. On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Mike Whisky wrote: > > Hi > I was wondering what CHT spread is acceptable in cruise. > I currently have a spread if 32 between my hottest and coolest cylinder in > LOP cruise. > I understand that a spread of 0 would be the ultimate goal but what spread > do other see in average. > > Mike > > -------- > RV-10 builder (flying) > #511 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430163#430163 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jesse Saint <jesse(at)saintaviation.com>
Subject: Re: Acceptable CHT spread
Date: Sep 07, 2014
The most important thing is that all CHT's be within acceptable limits. After that, the lower the spread the better. In my experience 32 degrees is quite good. I wouldn't worry about getting them closer than that. If you have one or two that are significantly different (ie, 5 are within 5 degrees and one is 30 degrees out), then you could do a little something, but if all are in the mid 300's, then I'd leave it alone. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. 352-427-0285 jesse(at)saintaviation.com Sent from my iPad > On Sep 7, 2014, at 4:20 PM, "Mike Whisky" wrote: > > > Hi > I was wondering what CHT spread is acceptable in cruise. > I currently have a spread if 32 between my hottest and coolest cylinder in LOP cruise. > I understand that a spread of 0 would be the ultimate goal but what spread do other see in average. > > Mike > > -------- > RV-10 builder (flying) > #511 > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430163#430163 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Acceptable CHT spread
Date: Sep 07, 2014
Agree with all the comments. Now for me, after injector balancing I have EGTs all peak within 0.2 GPH but #3 CHT is always the hottest by 30 degrees on climb out, 25 degrees in LOP cruise (#3 hottest, #4 coolest in both cases, the rest of the cylinders within a few degrees of #4 CHT). As #3 is in the middle, do I trim the cylinder inter baffles that came with the engine to cool off #3 or what? I already looked for casting flanges and such to clear between the cooling fins on #3 - no joy. Carl -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2014 4:36 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Acceptable CHT spread The most important thing is that all CHT's be within acceptable limits. After that, the lower the spread the better. In my experience 32 degrees is quite good. I wouldn't worry about getting them closer than that. If you have one or two that are significantly different (ie, 5 are within 5 degrees and one is 30 degrees out), then you could do a little something, but if all are in the mid 300's, then I'd leave it alone. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. 352-427-0285 jesse(at)saintaviation.com Sent from my iPad > On Sep 7, 2014, at 4:20 PM, "Mike Whisky" wrote: > > > Hi > I was wondering what CHT spread is acceptable in cruise. > I currently have a spread if 32 between my hottest and coolest cylinder in LOP cruise. > I understand that a spread of 0 would be the ultimate goal but what spread do other see in average. > > Mike > > -------- > RV-10 builder (flying) > #511 > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430163#430163 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Pascal" <rv10flyer(at)live.com>
Subject: Re: Acceptable CHT spread
Date: Sep 07, 2014
#3 for me as well, except my #3 is by far the coolest by 30F from the others on climb and within 5 degrees of #4 in cruise but still 30-40F off from #6 my hottest. -----Original Message----- From: Carl Froehlich Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2014 2:49 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Acceptable CHT spread Agree with all the comments. Now for me, after injector balancing I have EGTs all peak within 0.2 GPH but #3 CHT is always the hottest by 30 degrees on climb out, 25 degrees in LOP cruise (#3 hottest, #4 coolest in both cases, the rest of the cylinders within a few degrees of #4 CHT). As #3 is in the middle, do I trim the cylinder inter baffles that came with the engine to cool off #3 or what? I already looked for casting flanges and such to clear between the cooling fins on #3 - no joy. Carl -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2014 4:36 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Acceptable CHT spread The most important thing is that all CHT's be within acceptable limits. After that, the lower the spread the better. In my experience 32 degrees is quite good. I wouldn't worry about getting them closer than that. If you have one or two that are significantly different (ie, 5 are within 5 degrees and one is 30 degrees out), then you could do a little something, but if all are in the mid 300's, then I'd leave it alone. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. 352-427-0285 jesse(at)saintaviation.com Sent from my iPad > On Sep 7, 2014, at 4:20 PM, "Mike Whisky" wrote: > > > Hi > I was wondering what CHT spread is acceptable in cruise. > I currently have a spread if 32 between my hottest and coolest cylinder in LOP cruise. > I understand that a spread of 0 would be the ultimate goal but what spread do other see in average. > > Mike > > -------- > RV-10 builder (flying) > #511 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430163#430163 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 07, 2014
Subject: Re: Acceptable CHT spread
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Push the normalize button on the engine analyzer, if it has that feature, so they all appear to be same temp, and ignore the difference. There is no value in attempting to get it more balanced. On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Carl Froehlich wrote: > carl.froehlich(at)verizon.net> > > Agree with all the comments. > > Now for me, after injector balancing I have EGTs all peak within 0.2 GPH > but > #3 CHT is always the hottest by 30 degrees on climb out, 25 degrees in LOP > cruise (#3 hottest, #4 coolest in both cases, the rest of the cylinders > within a few degrees of #4 CHT). As #3 is in the middle, do I trim the > cylinder inter baffles that came with the engine to cool off #3 or what? > > I already looked for casting flanges and such to clear between the cooling > fins on #3 - no joy. > > Carl > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint > Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2014 4:36 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Acceptable CHT spread > > > The most important thing is that all CHT's be within acceptable limits. > After that, the lower the spread the better. In my experience 32 degrees is > quite good. I wouldn't worry about getting them closer than that. If you > have one or two that are significantly different (ie, 5 are within 5 > degrees > and one is 30 degrees out), then you could do a little something, but if > all > are in the mid 300's, then I'd leave it alone. > > Jesse Saint > Saint Aviation, Inc. > 352-427-0285 > jesse(at)saintaviation.com > > Sent from my iPad > > > On Sep 7, 2014, at 4:20 PM, "Mike Whisky" wrote: > > > > > > Hi > > I was wondering what CHT spread is acceptable in cruise. > > I currently have a spread if 32 between my hottest and coolest cylinder > in > LOP cruise. > > I understand that a spread of 0 would be the ultimate goal but what > spread > do other see in average. > > > > Mike > > > > -------- > > RV-10 builder (flying) > > #511 > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430163#430163 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 08, 2014
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Subject: Re: SB 2014-08-29
Go Back VAF Forums > Model Specific > RV-10 Reload this Page SERVICE BULLETIN 14-08-29 User Name Remember Me? Password Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Reply Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3 View First Unread View First Unread Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes #21 Unread Yesterday, 08:27 AM Bill.Peyton's Avatar Bill.Peyton Bill.Peyton is offline Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: St. Louis, MO Posts: 1,110 Default Scott, I agree with Vic. My concern is as the elastomer donuts contract, space develops between the donuts and the weldment when it is unloaded in flight. I have had this happen twice in 300 hours, and had to insert shims to remedy. You can here it rattle during taxi. When this occurs, my concern is that the edges of the new plate insert will rub on the 4 tubes going into the current bracket. We can see this as currently evidenced by the elastomer metal washer today. I do agree that adhesive in between the new plate and the old one may not be the right answer, but using a thin enough layer might prevent this situation from occurring I don't have the answer other than to weld the new reinforcement plate even on the non-cracking mounts. Did engineering look at this situation Scott? __________________ Bill Peyton RV-10 - 290hrs First Flight Oct 2012 WA0SYV Aviation Partners, LLC Reply With Quote #22 Unread Yesterday, 05:25 PM rdoerr01 rdoerr01 is offline Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 79 Default I completed the no-crack SB on my RV-10 this morning. I painted the plate yesterday and let it dry over night. This morning I put a small ring of red RTV on the plate half way between the inner circle and the outer edge. I stuck this into position to ensure the plate doesn't come close to any of the engine mount tubes at the corners. Then I lowered the airplane and a little of the pro seal squeeze out the side. Cleaned that up and then install the top cap with a single washer spacer. I like Vic told Van's that it needs some way to stop the plate from vibrating around and destroying the engine mount tube and they agreed, but didn't really suggest anything. Thanks Ray Doerr N519RV (1140 hours) 40250 Reply With Quote #23 Unread Yesterday, 05:36 PM rvbuilder2002 rvbuilder2002 is offline Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Oregon Posts: 3,511 Default Quote: Originally Posted by Bill.Peyton View Post Did engineering look at this situation Scott? Yes, it was looked at. That is why my previous post mentioned Quote: Originally Posted by rvbuilder2002 View Post If the doubler is installed without welding (as done in the case of no cracks found) and is installed as prescribed, with some compression pre-load on the elastomers even when the nose gear leg is hanging free, and it is maintained in this state; Yes, it will take some effort on owners part to occasionally check for loss of preload in the nose gear elastomers. It has always been a design intent that there not be play in this location. It is in fact possible that some level of play can have contributed to damage in some cases. N410RV went almost 2000 hrs using the originally installed elastomers, but it did require some periodic adjustment by adding an additional spacer washer. The need for that periodic check should probably have been better conveyed to those with flying RV-10's. As a result of the continued airworthiness program for the RV-12, I think we are beginning to do a better job with that type of thing. __________________ Any opinions expressed in this message are my own and not those of my employer. Reply With Quote #24 Unread Yesterday, 07:44 PM RV10inOz's Avatar RV10inOz RV10inOz is offline Join Date: May 2008 Location: Brisbane Qld. Aust. Posts: 1,786 Default Ours is welded in about now.new bits going in this afternoon Hopefully flying tomorrow! I will post pictures later. __________________ ______________________________ David Brown Advanced Pilot Seminars-Australia The two best investments you can make, by any financial test, an EMS and APS! Reply With Quote #25 Unread Yesterday, 08:53 PM rvbuilder2002 rvbuilder2002 is offline Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Oregon Posts: 3,511 Default Quote: Originally Posted by rdoerr01 View Post I like Vic told Van's that it needs some way to stop the plate from vibrating around and destroying the engine mount tube and they agreed, but didn't really suggest anything. Actually Van's didn't agree, which is why the NOTIFICATION was issued without that recommendation. Since you used some RTV (or proseal? you mention both...), report back at your next inspection and let me know if it is still holding the plate in place or not. __________________ Any opinions expressed in this message are my own and not those of my employer. Reply With Quote #26 Unread Today, 03:59 AM RV10inOz's Avatar RV10inOz RV10inOz is offline Join Date: May 2008 Location: Brisbane Qld. Aust. Posts: 1,786 Default All went together really well. The aviation welder did a beautiful job. Fixed a cracked step too! I forgot pics today but I will be zip tie crazy in the morning tethering all the wires, and I will take some then. Only problem has been the extra nose height gained from new rubbers, new nose wheel tyre (higher quality one is bigger in diameter) and the extra thickness has dropped outr tail down. The Comanche now will not pass its stabilator under our tail. Ohh welltime to fix that problem. But it is a good problem to have. Total man hours to date; Strip down and have ready for welding 10 hrs. Welding repairs 4-5 hrs approx. Reassemble 9 hrs. Tidy up and re cowl and paper work estimate 3-4 hrs. All up about 27-28 hours I guess. The fix with the spacer ring looks really solid. I assume that the doubler insertion actually achieves the same result. __________________ ______________________________ David Brown Advanced Pilot Seminars-Australia The two best investments you can make, by any financial test, an EMS and APS! Reply With Quote #27 Unread Today, 08:09 AM vic syracuse vic syracuse is online now Super Moderator Join Date: May 2005 Location: Locust Grove, GA Posts: 1,014 Default Nose sits higher Yes, I noticed that the nose sits a little more proud now. I measured it at about a 1" gain. Mine has both the new plate and the doubler. I noticed it as well when I was cleaning the vertical fin, as I could reach up quite a bit higher. And it sounds much more solid when taxiing now, too. Scott, I did religiously make certain the elastomers were tight. I had 4 of the washers in mine. I see now that the service bulletin recommends replacement when 3 are needed. Vic __________________ Vic Syracuse Built RV-4, RV-6, 2-RV-10's, RV-7A, RV-8, Prescott Pusher, Kitfox Model II, Kitfox Speedster, Kitfox 7 Super Sport, DAR, A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor, CFII-ASMEL/ASES Base Leg Aviation Mallards Landing, GA (GA04) Reply With Quote #28 Unread Today, 09:13 AM rvbuilder2002 rvbuilder2002 is offline Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Oregon Posts: 3,511 Default Quote: Originally Posted by vic syracuse View Post Yes, I noticed that the nose sits a little more proud now. I measured it at about a 1" gain. Mine has both the new plate and the doubler. I noticed it as well when I was cleaning the vertical fin, as I could reach up quite a bit higher. And it sounds much more solid when taxiing now, too. Scott, I did religiously make certain the elastomers were tight. I had 4 of the washers in mine. I see now that the service bulletin recommends replacement when 3 are needed. Vic I think the recommendation is to replace if you need MORE than 3. __________________ Any opinions expressed in this message are my own and not those of my employer. Reply With Quote #29 Unread Today, 09:54 AM vic syracuse vic syracuse is online now Super Moderator Join Date: May 2005 Location: Locust Grove, GA Posts: 1,014 Default Yep. Yep, more than 3. Vic __________________ Vic Syracuse Built RV-4, RV-6, 2-RV-10's, RV-7A, RV-8, Prescott Pusher, Kitfox Model II, Kitfox Speedster, Kitfox 7 Super Sport, DAR, A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor, CFII-ASMEL/ASES Base Leg Aviation Mallards Landing, GA (GA04) Reply With Quote #30 I did my SB work this weekend. I ended up using a thin layer of RTV but did it over the entire surface, and then jacked the back end up so squeeze everything out that I could. In the end, there is really almost zero gap between the 2 plates, and there shouldn't easily be any moisture that gets in there. I believe the SB should prevent much worry about that particular part breaking, but I do have one area of concern that will linger. The shaft that the elastomers ride on, directly contacts the hole in the engine mount. The doubler is slightly larger, so there won't be an issue with that. But, when you look at the shaft, right at the top of the topmost elastomer, one side of my shaft was chafing on the hole of the engine mount. This led to a slight thinning of the shaft in one area. One other thing I noticed is that the shaft had a bit of rust inside. I believe that: 1) people should prime (NOT liquid plumber, but liquid PRIMER) the inside of that shaft before initial assembly. 2) That shaft won't last forever. At 1070 hours, it's showing wear. I'm sure it'll go 2000 hours. But, since this thing was designed with no replaceable wear surfaces, it won't last forever. I would love to see a sleeve over that part of the shaft, that can be replaced, but doing so would require that the elastomers were made with a larger hole, and the tophat shaped retainer would have to be wider too. So this isn't likely to be an easy thing to fix. So, I think people are going to have to pull that shaft and inspect it (I'd recommend maybe a 500hour inspection at least) and replace as necessary. On Van's end, I'd hope that they keep a dozen of these in stock, because it's going to be considered a wear part on higher time RV-10's. I don't know what that part costs, but it would be nice if there was some sort of bushing there to protect it...either on the hole side, or the shaft side, that could be replaced. Maybe Planearound should re-engineer for a bushing. :) Tim On 8/31/2014 9:07 AM, Barry wrote: > > Two thoughts > > 1. With the WD-1001K-MOD doubler installed it looks like there will be more clearence so the metal plates of the elastomers may clear the support tubes > > 2. With the added thickness of the doubler, you may need fewer U-1002 washers to take up the slack. I wonder if three washers will still be the max allowed > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=429679#429679 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 08, 2014
Subject: Re: SB 2014-08-29
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Having owned a Mooney for 16 yrs with the exact same shock disks as those on the nose of the RV-10, I am a bit surprised that they would lose that much height. They are installed with more compression on the Mooney, requiring sizable tools to compress, they only lose height on the newer, heavier models. My E model is about 1645 lbs empty with 2575 gross. It uses 4 disks on the mains and 3 on the nose. After 14 yrs they still meet spec for tension, with no added spacers. Perhaps the RV could use more compression........... On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Tim Olson wrote: > > > Scott, > I agree with Vic. > My concern is as the elastomer donuts contract, space develops between the > donuts and the weldment when it is unloaded in flight. I have had this > happen twice in 300 hours, and had to insert shims to remedy. You can here > it rattle during taxi. When this occurs, my concern is that the edges of > the new plate insert will rub on the 4 tubes going into the current > bracket. We can see this as currently evidenced by the elastomer metal > washer today. I do agree that adhesive in between the new plate and the old > one may not be the right answer, but using a thin enough layer might > prevent this situation from occurring I don't have the answer other than to > weld the new reinforcement plate even on the non-cracking mounts. > Did engineering look at this situation Scott? > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: SB 2014-08-29
From: "johngoodman" <johngoodman(at)earthlink.net>
Date: Sep 08, 2014
I found no cracks, and ordered the WD-1001K-MOD today from Van. They told me that it was backordered, so it will be a few weeks. I don't plan on installing it until my next Condition. John -------- #40572 Phase One complete in 2011 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430197#430197 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 08, 2014
From: Linn Walters <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: SB 2014-08-29
I didn't find any cracks .... and no grass field ops ....... ;-) I'm not flying yet so if someone needs one (and I'm not on the backorder list too :-P ) let me know. All I got was an email saying they'd send it out. Linn On 9/8/2014 4:44 PM, johngoodman wrote: > > I found no cracks, and ordered the WD-1001K-MOD today from Van. They told me that it was backordered, so it will be a few weeks. I don't plan on installing it until my next Condition. > John > > -------- > #40572 Phase One complete in 2011 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430197#430197 > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 08, 2014
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: SB 2014-08-29
I requested mine last week, got it today. If someone is AOG and really needs it, could forward. Planning on painting this pm and mount in the next day or two. On 9/8/2014 1:57 PM, Linn Walters wrote: > > I didn't find any cracks .... and no grass field ops ....... ;-) > > I'm not flying yet so if someone needs one (and I'm not on the > backorder list too :-P ) let me know. All I got was an email saying > they'd send it out. > Linn > > On 9/8/2014 4:44 PM, johngoodman wrote: >> >> >> I found no cracks, and ordered the WD-1001K-MOD today from Van. They >> told me that it was backordered, so it will be a few weeks. I don't >> plan on installing it until my next Condition. >> John >> >> -------- >> #40572 Phase One complete in 2011 >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430197#430197 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Conduit in the wing
From: "jeffwhip" <jeffwhip(at)me.com>
Date: Sep 08, 2014
I was wondering what size of conduit to buy? Did you buy it from Van's? Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430210#430210 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Conduit in the wing
Date: Sep 09, 2014
3/4" plastic coil tubing from the Aviation Department at Lowes. Carl -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of jeffwhip Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 10:38 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Conduit in the wing I was wondering what size of conduit to buy? Did you buy it from Van's? Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430210#430210 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 09, 2014
Subject: RV-10 Houston - Bad News - Apparently Good Ending
From: Phillip Perry <philperry9(at)gmail.com>
http://abc13.com/news/scary-moments-for-two-people-on-small-plane-in-se-harris-co/301532/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jesse Saint <jesse(at)saintaviation.com>
Subject: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL
Date: Sep 10, 2014
I have been wanting to do this for a while, and have done it in the past. In the next month or so I would like to have a day, probably a Saturday, that we can get a bunch of RV-10's together from the SE to our place at X35. We would plan to BBQ and hang out and talk RV-10's, but I was just thinking that it might be a great time to get people together to do the new SB inspections and fix, probably at least for no-cracks planes. Please post here if you would be interested in something like this and what day or days would work best in the next 4-6 weeks to do it. A plus is that we have equipment to powder coat and also have some spare parts for those areas in case they are needed. For those traveling further than comfortable for a single day, we could probably arrange either accommodations, or a place to camp, or a ride to a hotel as needed. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. 352-427-0285 jesse(at)saintaviation.com Sent from my iPad ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Pascal" <rv10flyer(at)live.com>
Subject: Re: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL
Date: Sep 10, 2014
great idea Jesse! Sorry! done my Florida trip for the year, but I would have joined to finally make it out to X35. Pascal -----Original Message----- From: Jesse Saint Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 6:53 PM Subject: RV10-List: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL I have been wanting to do this for a while, and have done it in the past. In the next month or so I would like to have a day, probably a Saturday, that we can get a bunch of RV-10's together from the SE to our place at X35. We would plan to BBQ and hang out and talk RV-10's, but I was just thinking that it might be a great time to get people together to do the new SB inspections and fix, probably at least for no-cracks planes. Please post here if you would be interested in something like this and what day or days would work best in the next 4-6 weeks to do it. A plus is that we have equipment to powder coat and also have some spare parts for those areas in case they are needed. For those traveling further than comfortable for a single day, we could probably arrange either accommodations, or a place to camp, or a ride to a hotel as needed. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. 352-427-0285 jesse(at)saintaviation.com Sent from my iPad ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Danny Riggs <jdriggs49(at)msn.com>
Subject: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL
Date: Sep 10, 2014
Where is X35??! > From: rv10flyer(at)live.com > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL > Date: Wed=2C 10 Sep 2014 19:14:39 -0700 > > > great idea Jesse! Sorry! done my Florida trip for the year=2C but I would have > joined to finally make it out to X35. > Pascal > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jesse Saint > Sent: Wednesday=2C September 10=2C 2014 6:53 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL > > > I have been wanting to do this for a while=2C and have done it in the pas t. In > the next month or so I would like to have a day=2C probably a Saturday=2C that > we can get a bunch of RV-10's together from the SE to our place at X35. W e > would plan to BBQ and hang out and talk RV-10's=2C but I was just thinkin g > that it might be a great time to get people together to do the new SB > inspections and fix=2C probably at least for no-cracks planes. Please pos t > here if you would be interested in something like this and what day or da ys > would work best in the next 4-6 weeks to do it. A plus is that we have > equipment to powder coat and also have some spare parts for those areas i n > case they are needed. > > For those traveling further than comfortable for a single day=2C we could > probably arrange either accommodations=2C or a place to camp=2C or a ride to a > hotel as needed. > > Jesse Saint > Saint Aviation=2C Inc. > 352-427-0285 > jesse(at)saintaviation.com > > Sent from my iPad > > > > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jesse Saint <jesse(at)saintaviation.com>
Subject: Re: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL
Date: Sep 11, 2014
It's near Ocala in north Florida. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. 352-427-0285 jesse(at)saintaviation.com Sent from my iPad > On Sep 10, 2014, at 11:08 PM, Danny Riggs wrote: > > Where is X35??! > > > From: rv10flyer(at)live.com > > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > > Subject: Re: RV10-List: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL > > Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:14:39 -0700 > > > > > > great idea Jesse! Sorry! done my Florida trip for the year, but I would h ave > > joined to finally make it out to X35. > > Pascal > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jesse Saint > > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 6:53 PM > > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > > Subject: RV10-List: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL > > > > > > I have been wanting to do this for a while, and have done it in the past . In > > the next month or so I would like to have a day, probably a Saturday, th at > > we can get a bunch of RV-10's together from the SE to our place at X35. W e > > would plan to BBQ and hang out and talk RV-10's, but I was just thinking > > that it might be a great time to get people together to do the new SB > > inspections and fix, probably at least for no-cracks planes. Please post > > here if you would be interested in something like this and what day or d ays > > would work best in the next 4-6 weeks to do it. A plus is that we have > > equipment to powder coat and also have some spare parts for those areas i n > > case they are needed. > > > > For those traveling further than comfortable for a single day, we could > > probably arrange either accommodations, or a place to camp, or a ride to a > > hotel as needed. > > > > Jesse Saint > > Saint Aviation, Inc. > > 352-427-0285 > > jesse(at)saintaviation.com > > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > > > > > > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > > > > > > > > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2014
From: Linn Walters <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL
On 9/10/2014 11:08 PM, Danny Riggs wrote: > Where is X35??! There is a little-known (obviously) site called airnav ..... http://www.airnav.com/ where you can click on 'airports', type in X35 (or any other designator) and pull up the info. I'll make it easier for ya .... http://www.airnav.com/airport/X35. Linn ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rob Kermanj <flysrv10(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL
Date: Sep 11, 2014
Count me in jesse. Great idea. On Sep 11, 2014, at 7:26 AM, Jesse Saint wrote: > It's near Ocala in north Florida. > > Jesse Saint > Saint Aviation, Inc. > 352-427-0285 > jesse(at)saintaviation.com > > Sent from my iPad > > On Sep 10, 2014, at 11:08 PM, Danny Riggs wrote: > >> Where is X35??! >> >> > From: rv10flyer(at)live.com >> > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >> > Subject: Re: RV10-List: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL >> > Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:14:39 -0700 >> > >> > >> > great idea Jesse! Sorry! done my Florida trip for the year, but I would have >> > joined to finally make it out to X35. >> > Pascal >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Jesse Saint >> > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 6:53 PM >> > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >> > Subject: RV10-List: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL >> > >> > >> > I have been wanting to do this for a while, and have done it in the past. In >> > the next month or so I would like to have a day, probably a Saturday, that >> > we can get a bunch of RV-10's together from the SE to our place at X35. We >> > would plan to BBQ and hang out and talk RV-10's, but I was just thinking >> > that it might be a great time to get people together to do the new SB >> > inspections and fix, probably at least for no-cracks planes. Please post >> > here if you would be interested in something like this and what day or days >> > would work best in the next 4-6 weeks to do it. A plus is that we have >> > equipment to powder coat and also have some spare parts for those areas in >> > case they are needed. >> > >> > For those traveling further than comfortable for a single day, we could >> > probably arrange either accommodations, or a place to camp, or a ride to a >> > hotel as needed. >> > >> > Jesse Saint >> > Saint Aviation, Inc. >> > 352-427-0285 >> > jesse(at)saintaviation.com >> > >> > Sent from my iPad >> > >> > >> > >> &======================== == --> http://www====================== ========= >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D >> List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D >> //forums.matronics.com >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D >> ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D >> > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Side windows
From: "jrlark" <jrlark(at)bmts.com>
Date: Sep 11, 2014
Hi all, I'm trying to decide how to finish the little gap between my side windows and the inside of the canopy. I have used Geoff Combs adhesive and will not have a head liner. First thing to mind is black silicon, but there are rubber butyl and urethane caulks out there as well. What have others used? Thx Rick #40956 Southampton, ont Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430361#430361 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2014
Subject: Re: Side windows
From: Ed Kranz <ed.kranz(at)gmail.com>
I'm actually just putting together a video about this process. First, I masked the inside of the windows, with about 1/4" extra exposed for the fillet. When you're bonding the windows in place, you will have some extra lord adhesive squeeze out on the inside. You can just use your fingers (in rubber gloves) to form a nice fillet. While I am going with a headliner, on the door windows, this is going to be my finished transition. I'll be painting the adhesive along with the rest of the inside of the door. This looks as good as any car window transition that I've seen. On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:55 AM, jrlark wrote: > > Hi all, I'm trying to decide how to finish the little gap between my side > windows and the inside of the canopy. I have used Geoff Combs adhesive and > will not have a head liner. First thing to mind is black silicon, but > there are rubber butyl and urethane caulks out there as well. > What have others used? > Thx > > Rick > #40956 > Southampton, ont > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430361#430361 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2014
From: Linn Walters <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Side windows
I painted the inside of the cabin with Zolatone. I have to spray the rivet backing strips anyway so I'll mask off the windows .... again .... and spray around the windows too. Linn .... slather, sand, spray, sand ..... finishing around the outside of the cabin top/cowl with UV Smoothprime. On 9/11/2014 9:55 AM, jrlark wrote: > > Hi all, I'm trying to decide how to finish the little gap between my side windows and the inside of the canopy. I have used Geoff Combs adhesive and will not have a head liner. First thing to mind is black silicon, but there are rubber butyl and urethane caulks out there as well. > What have others used? > Thx > > Rick > #40956 > Southampton, ont > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430361#430361 > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Side windows
From: "rv10flyer" <wayne.gillispie(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 11, 2014
I did as Ed...used my finger to form a fillet using Weld-On 45(thicker version of 10). No liner. Painted interior gray. We like it al lot. Ed, I think he said in the above post that he "used" Geoff's adhesive, so I am guessing it is cured. The outside joint with a thin layer of fg on the other hand has small paint cracks in some areas due to different expansion rates. -------- Wayne G. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430376#430376 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Sandra & Rick" <jrlark(at)bmts.com>
Subject: Re: Side windows
Date: Sep 11, 2014
Hey guys, yes it's the Lord Adhesive I used several weeks ago. The adhesive is white which I don't want to see as the interior of the canopy is/will be light grey. So my intention is to add a decorative bead between the window and the fibreglass. Does anyone know if the Lord adhesive can be painted. By the looks of it I would doubt it. Thx, Rick -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of rv10flyer Sent: September-11-14 12:24 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Side windows I did as Ed...used my finger to form a fillet using Weld-On 45(thicker version of 10). No liner. Painted interior gray. We like it al lot. Ed, I think he said in the above post that he "used" Geoff's adhesive, so I am guessing it is cured. The outside joint with a thin layer of fg on the other hand has small paint cracks in some areas due to different expansion rates. -------- Wayne G. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430376#430376 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: LEON EVERETT <leeverett(at)msn.com>
Subject: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL
Date: Sep 11, 2014
Sounds great! I'd be interested. 2.7 hours from 2M2. Oct 4 or 11? Leon Everett From: jesse(at)saintaviation.com Subject: Re: RV10-List: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL Date: Thu=2C 11 Sep 2014 07:26:42 -0400 It's near Ocala in north Florida. Jesse SaintSaint Aviation=2C Inc.352-427-0285jesse(at)saintaviation.com Sent from my iPad On Sep 10=2C 2014=2C at 11:08 PM=2C Danny Riggs wrote: Where is X35??! > From: rv10flyer(at)live.com > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL > Date: Wed=2C 10 Sep 2014 19:14:39 -0700 > > > great idea Jesse! Sorry! done my Florida trip for the year=2C but I would have > joined to finally make it out to X35. > Pascal > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jesse Saint > Sent: Wednesday=2C September 10=2C 2014 6:53 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL > > > I have been wanting to do this for a while=2C and have done it in the pas t. In > the next month or so I would like to have a day=2C probably a Saturday=2C that > we can get a bunch of RV-10's together from the SE to our place at X35. W e > would plan to BBQ and hang out and talk RV-10's=2C but I was just thinkin g > that it might be a great time to get people together to do the new SB > inspections and fix=2C probably at least for no-cracks planes. Please pos t > here if you would be interested in something like this and what day or da ys > would work best in the next 4-6 weeks to do it. A plus is that we have > equipment to powder coat and also have some spare parts for those areas i n > case they are needed. > > For those traveling further than comfortable for a single day=2C we could > probably arrange either accommodations=2C or a place to camp=2C or a ride to a > hotel as needed. > > Jesse Saint > Saint Aviation=2C Inc. > 352-427-0285 > jesse(at)saintaviation.com > > Sent from my iPad > > > &======================== == --> http://www================= ============== > > > D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D //forums.matronics.com D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D ot=3B">http://www.matronics.com/contribution D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Geoff Combs" <g.combs(at)aerosportmodeling.com>
Subject: Re: Side windows
Date: Sep 11, 2014
The lord adhesive is urethane and will expect paint very nice. Just make a real nice fillet with the lord adhesive when putting in the Windows and then tape-off the window right up to your bead and paint to your desired color. It looks great. I would not use silicone or a sealer that would peel off in time. Geoff Combs -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Sandra & Rick Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 12:45 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Side windows Hey guys, yes it's the Lord Adhesive I used several weeks ago. The adhesive is white which I don't want to see as the interior of the canopy is/will be light grey. So my intention is to add a decorative bead between the window and the fibreglass. Does anyone know if the Lord adhesive can be painted. By the looks of it I would doubt it. Thx, Rick -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of rv10flyer Sent: September-11-14 12:24 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Side windows I did as Ed...used my finger to form a fillet using Weld-On 45(thicker version of 10). No liner. Painted interior gray. We like it al lot. Ed, I think he said in the above post that he "used" Geoff's adhesive, so I am guessing it is cured. The outside joint with a thin layer of fg on the other hand has small paint cracks in some areas due to different expansion rates. -------- Wayne G. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430376#430376 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rick Lark <larkrv10(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Side windows
Date: Sep 11, 2014
Thx Geoff I never thought of painting the Lord adhesive so that will make the whole process way easier. I never left a fillet when I installed the windows, so I'll go back and do that, and then paint the cabin top. Rick Sent from my iPad > On Sep 11, 2014, at 6:02 PM, "Geoff Combs" wrote: > > > The lord adhesive is urethane and will expect paint very nice. Just make a > real nice fillet with the lord adhesive when putting in the > Windows and then tape-off the window right up to your bead and paint to your > desired color. It looks great. I would not use > silicone or a sealer that would peel off in time. > > > Geoff Combs > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Sandra & Rick > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 12:45 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Side windows > > > Hey guys, yes it's the Lord Adhesive I used several weeks ago. The adhesive > is white which I don't want to see as the interior of the canopy is/will be > light grey. So my intention is to add a decorative bead between the window > and the fibreglass. Does anyone know if the Lord adhesive can be painted. > By the looks of it I would doubt it. > > Thx, Rick > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of rv10flyer > Sent: September-11-14 12:24 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Re: Side windows > > > I did as Ed...used my finger to form a fillet using Weld-On 45(thicker > version of 10). > > No liner. Painted interior gray. We like it al lot. > > Ed, I think he said in the above post that he "used" Geoff's adhesive, so I > am guessing it is cured. > > The outside joint with a thin layer of fg on the other hand has small paint > cracks in some areas due to different expansion rates. > > -------- > Wayne G. > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430376#430376 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 12, 2014
From: Tim Lewis <TimRVator(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Engine marathon: Case crack, bad cam, high CHT, stumbling
Case crack: During my RV-10 2014 Condition Inspection I found a small crack in the crank case under the #2 cylinder on my RV-10's IO-540. I had rebuilt the engine 500 hours earlier. I knew it was a high time case (6500 hours) with overhauled but high time cylinders, so I had paid extra attention to looking for cracks. Unfortunately, I found one (confirmed by dye penetrant). So, of course, the engine had to come of the airplane and be completely disassembled for crank case replacement. Ruined cam: Upon splitting the case, I found significant pitting on several of the tappet bodies. The cam shaft had to be replaced, as did several tappet bodies. I got a lot of engine assembly assistance from a well regarded local repair station (Tom Schweitz at Aero Engines in Winchester, VA he's a super guy to work with). Tom told me that the cam & tappet damage was caused by rust forming on the cam shaft wear surface. I fly the RV-10 about 120 hours per year, which was apparently not adequate to prevent rust on the cam shaft wear surface. Following Tom's recommendation, I now use a Tempest engine dehumidifier to try to prevent a recurrence. CHTs too high (defective electronic ignition): Aero Engines provided me a very good price on a low time (1500 TTSN) narrow deck crank case. Since I had the engine torn down anyway, I elected to replace my existing cylinders (high time, but servicable) with new Lycoming cylinders. So I was expecting higher than normal CHTs on my first flights. I found, however, that CHTs remained high even after oil consumption had stabilized (beyond 10 hours). CHTs would climb above 430 on take off unless I reduced power at about 1000'. CHTs were nearly 430 in low level full throttle flight with mixture full rich. Baffling checks and all the other proven RV-10 cooling tips from Tim Olsen's wonderful web site didn't seem to help much. Eventually I began to suspect advanced timing (thanks, Mike Busch). I found that when I switched off the Lightspeed electronic ignition all my CHTs in climb and full power operation were normal. My mag timing was fine. Using an automotive strobe timing light, I discovered that the Lightspeed electronic ignition (EI) was stuck at 43 degrees BTDC (!!), and did not change timing based on manifold pressure. This is a very risky situation advanced timing reduces detonation margin. A borescope inspection revealed no signs of detonation damage. A recent Mike Busch webinar describes a brand new engine being destroyed by advanced timing, so I feel I dodged a bullet. I paid Lightspeed to repair the defective EI computer (bad connection on a timing capacitor, according to Klaus) and to update the hardware to the latest revision. After reinstalling the EI computer, all CHTs are now normal. Power stumble (air leak): At this point, I was hyper attuned to any engine performance abnormality. I noticed an occasional slight power reduction for a second or two at a time, when operating at lower power settings. Based on discussion with a Lycoming tech rep during OSH, I went on a hunt for any air leaking into the fuel lines. The Lycoming rep suggested the fuel flow transducer (red cube) as a frequent source of trouble (including cavitation bubbles). I torqued all fuel fittings firewall forward. Inside the cabin, I removed the red cube, and discovered evidence of a fuel seep at the fitting on the forward side of the cube. After considerable fiddling, I was able to achieve another turn on the fuel fitting without exceeding the red cube's torque spec. After reinstalling the red cube, the occasional power stumble in flight has not recurred. Several airplane experts have been very helpful to me in this process. Dick Koehler (IA, tech counselor, EAA Hints for Homebuilders webinar presenter) was an invaluable source of advice. Tom Schweitz at Winchester Aero Engines was fabulous to work with. He saved me a bunch of money on parts, and provided invaluable help getting the project finished. -- Tim Lewis -- HEF (Manassas, VA) A&P RV-6A N47TD -- 1104 hrs - sold RV-10 N31TD -- 500 hrs ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jesse Saint <jesse(at)saintaviation.com>
Subject: Re: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL
Date: Sep 12, 2014
I know there is another fly-in that weekend, but most responses have one back for October 11th. We will talk to the airport manager about camping onsite. We will see what we can work out. If it is ok, we will let everybody know. Please continue responding if you plan to make it. The weather should be cooler by then. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. 352-427-0285 jesse(at)saintaviation.com Sent from my iPad > On Sep 10, 2014, at 9:53 PM, Jesse Saint wrote: > > > I have been wanting to do this for a while, and have done it in the past. In the next month or so I would like to have a day, probably a Saturday, that we can get a bunch of RV-10's together from the SE to our place at X35. We would plan to BBQ and hang out and talk RV-10's, but I was just thinking that it might be a great time to get people together to do the new SB inspections and fix, probably at least for no-cracks planes. Please post here if you would be interested in something like this and what day or days would work best in the next 4-6 weeks to do it. A plus is that we have equipment to powder coat and also have some spare parts for those areas in case they are needed. > > For those traveling further than comfortable for a single day, we could probably arrange either accommodations, or a place to camp, or a ride to a hotel as needed. > > Jesse Saint > Saint Aviation, Inc. > 352-427-0285 > jesse(at)saintaviation.com > > Sent from my iPad > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: David Saylor <saylor.dave(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 12, 2014
Subject: Re: Engine marathon: Case crack, bad cam, high CHT, stumbling
Tim, thanks for your notes. Can you tell us what kind of oil you were using? Any additives? --Dave On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Tim Lewis wrote: > > Case crack: During my RV-10 2014 Condition Inspection I found a small > crack in the crank case under the #2 cylinder on my RV-10's IO-540. I had > rebuilt the engine 500 hours earlier. I knew it was a high time case (650 0 > hours) with overhauled but high time cylinders, so I had paid extra > attention to looking for cracks. Unfortunately, I found one (confirmed by > dye penetrant). So, of course, the engine had to come of the airplane and > be completely disassembled for crank case replacement. > > Ruined cam: Upon splitting the case, I found significant pitting on > several of the tappet bodies. The cam shaft had to be replaced, as did > several tappet bodies. I got a lot of engine assembly assistance from a > well regarded local repair station (Tom Schweitz at Aero Engines in > Winchester, VA =93 he's a super guy to work with). Tom told me that the cam & > tappet damage was caused by rust forming on the cam shaft wear surface. I > fly the RV-10 about 120 hours per year, which was apparently not adequate > to prevent rust on the cam shaft wear surface. Following Tom's > recommendation, I now use a Tempest engine dehumidifier to try to prevent a > recurrence. > > CHTs too high (defective electronic ignition): Aero Engines provided me a > very good price on a low time (1500 TTSN) narrow deck crank case. Since I > had the engine torn down anyway, I elected to replace my existing cylinde rs > (high time, but servicable) with new Lycoming cylinders. So I was expecti ng > higher than normal CHTs on my first flights. I found, however, that CHTs > remained high even after oil consumption had stabilized (beyond 10 hours) . > CHTs would climb above 430 on take off unless I reduced power at about > 1000'. CHTs were nearly 430 in low level full throttle flight with mixtur e > full rich. Baffling checks and all the other proven RV-10 cooling tips fr om > Tim Olsen's wonderful web site didn't seem to help much. Eventually I beg an > to suspect advanced timing (thanks, Mike Busch). I found that when I > switched off the Lightspeed electronic ignition all my CHTs in climb and > full power operation were normal. My mag timing was fine. Using an > automotive strobe timing light, I discovered that the Lightspeed electron ic > ignition (EI) was stuck at 43 degrees BTDC (!!), and did not change timin g > based on manifold pressure. This is a very risky situation =93 adva nced > timing reduces detonation margin. A borescope inspection revealed no sign s > of detonation damage. A recent Mike Busch webinar describes a brand new > engine being destroyed by advanced timing, so I feel I dodged a bullet. > > I paid Lightspeed to repair the defective EI computer (bad connection on a > timing capacitor, according to Klaus) and to update the hardware to the > latest revision. After reinstalling the EI computer, all CHTs are now > normal. > > Power stumble (air leak): At this point, I was hyper attuned to any engin e > performance abnormality. I noticed an occasional slight power reduction f or > a second or two at a time, when operating at lower power settings. Based on > discussion with a Lycoming tech rep during OSH, I went on a hunt for any > air leaking into the fuel lines. The Lycoming rep suggested the fuel flow > transducer (red cube) as a frequent source of trouble (including cavitati on > bubbles). I torqued all fuel fittings firewall forward. Inside the cabin, I > removed the red cube, and discovered evidence of a fuel seep at the fitti ng > on the forward side of the cube. After considerable fiddling, I was able to > achieve another turn on the fuel fitting without exceeding the red cube's > torque spec. After reinstalling the red cube, the occasional power stumbl e > in flight has not recurred. > > Several airplane experts have been very helpful to me in this process. > Dick Koehler (IA, tech counselor, EAA =9CHints for Homebuilders =9D webinar > presenter) was an invaluable source of advice. Tom Schweitz at Winchester > Aero Engines was fabulous to work with. He saved me a bunch of money on > parts, and provided invaluable help getting the project finished. > > -- > Tim Lewis -- HEF (Manassas, VA) > A&P > RV-6A N47TD -- 1104 hrs - sold > RV-10 N31TD -- 500 hrs > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 12, 2014
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Subject: Re: Engine marathon: Case crack, bad cam, high CHT, stumbling
Wow Tim, you really had the adventure lately! Thanks for posting. Great tips for things people can look for. I'm hoping I don't get rust on my cams, considering I'm not down to about 100 hours per year or maybe even less. What oil are you using, and are you using camguard? I'm still using exxon elite for now, but bought 4 cases of Phillips X/C at OSH. Camguard from everything I've read, is actually a worthwhile rust preventative, so I'm going to stick with using it. Lots of good info from Aviation consumer on it. Also, i think I just read within the last week or two that Continental is going to be testing camguard. It sounds like they find it intriguing as well. Maybe they'll make it one of their recommendations officially some day. Anyway, just some questions for you. Tim On 9/12/2014 7:59 PM, Tim Lewis wrote: > > Case crack: During my RV-10 2014 Condition Inspection I found a small > crack in the crank case under the #2 cylinder on my RV-10's IO-540. I > had rebuilt the engine 500 hours earlier. I knew it was a high time case > (6500 hours) with overhauled but high time cylinders, so I had paid > extra attention to looking for cracks. Unfortunately, I found one > (confirmed by dye penetrant). So, of course, the engine had to come of > the airplane and be completely disassembled for crank case replacement. > > Ruined cam: Upon splitting the case, I found significant pitting on > several of the tappet bodies. The cam shaft had to be replaced, as did > several tappet bodies. I got a lot of engine assembly assistance from a > well regarded local repair station (Tom Schweitz at Aero Engines in > Winchester, VA he's a super guy to work with). Tom told me that the > cam & tappet damage was caused by rust forming on the cam shaft wear > surface. I fly the RV-10 about 120 hours per year, which was apparently > not adequate to prevent rust on the cam shaft wear surface. Following > Tom's recommendation, I now use a Tempest engine dehumidifier to try to > prevent a recurrence. > > CHTs too high (defective electronic ignition): Aero Engines provided me > a very good price on a low time (1500 TTSN) narrow deck crank case. > Since I had the engine torn down anyway, I elected to replace my > existing cylinders (high time, but servicable) with new Lycoming > cylinders. So I was expecting higher than normal CHTs on my first > flights. I found, however, that CHTs remained high even after oil > consumption had stabilized (beyond 10 hours). CHTs would climb above 430 > on take off unless I reduced power at about 1000'. CHTs were nearly 430 > in low level full throttle flight with mixture full rich. Baffling > checks and all the other proven RV-10 cooling tips from Tim Olsen's > wonderful web site didn't seem to help much. Eventually I began to > suspect advanced timing (thanks, Mike Busch). I found that when I > switched off the Lightspeed electronic ignition all my CHTs in climb and > full power operation were normal. My mag timing was fine. Using an > automotive strobe timing light, I discovered that the Lightspeed > electronic ignition (EI) was stuck at 43 degrees BTDC (!!), and did not > change timing based on manifold pressure. This is a very risky situation > advanced timing reduces detonation margin. A borescope inspection > revealed no signs of detonation damage. A recent Mike Busch webinar > describes a brand new engine being destroyed by advanced timing, so I > feel I dodged a bullet. > > I paid Lightspeed to repair the defective EI computer (bad connection on > a timing capacitor, according to Klaus) and to update the hardware to > the latest revision. After reinstalling the EI computer, all CHTs are > now normal. > > Power stumble (air leak): At this point, I was hyper attuned to any > engine performance abnormality. I noticed an occasional slight power > reduction for a second or two at a time, when operating at lower power > settings. Based on discussion with a Lycoming tech rep during OSH, I > went on a hunt for any air leaking into the fuel lines. The Lycoming rep > suggested the fuel flow transducer (red cube) as a frequent source of > trouble (including cavitation bubbles). I torqued all fuel fittings > firewall forward. Inside the cabin, I removed the red cube, and > discovered evidence of a fuel seep at the fitting on the forward side of > the cube. After considerable fiddling, I was able to achieve another > turn on the fuel fitting without exceeding the red cube's torque spec. > After reinstalling the red cube, the occasional power stumble in flight > has not recurred. > > Several airplane experts have been very helpful to me in this process. > Dick Koehler (IA, tech counselor, EAA Hints for Homebuilders webinar > presenter) was an invaluable source of advice. Tom Schweitz at > Winchester Aero Engines was fabulous to work with. He saved me a bunch > of money on parts, and provided invaluable help getting the project > finished. > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Engine marathon: Case crack, bad cam, high CHT, stumbling
From: Justin Jones <jmjones2000(at)mindspring.com>
Date: Sep 12, 2014
Plus one more for ASL Camguard! Justin On Sep 12, 2014, at 18:00, Tim Olson wrote: > > Wow Tim, you really had the adventure lately! Thanks for posting. > Great tips for things people can look for. > I'm hoping I don't get rust on my cams, considering I'm not down > to about 100 hours per year or maybe even less. What oil are you > using, and are you using camguard? I'm still using exxon elite > for now, but bought 4 cases of Phillips X/C at OSH. Camguard from > everything I've read, is actually a worthwhile rust preventative, > so I'm going to stick with using it. Lots of good info from Aviation > consumer on it. Also, i think I just read within the last week or > two that Continental is going to be testing camguard. It sounds like > they find it intriguing as well. Maybe they'll make it one of their > recommendations officially some day. > > Anyway, just some questions for you. > Tim > > > On 9/12/2014 7:59 PM, Tim Lewis wrote: >> >> Case crack: During my RV-10 2014 Condition Inspection I found a small >> crack in the crank case under the #2 cylinder on my RV-10's IO-540. I >> had rebuilt the engine 500 hours earlier. I knew it was a high time case >> (6500 hours) with overhauled but high time cylinders, so I had paid >> extra attention to looking for cracks. Unfortunately, I found one >> (confirmed by dye penetrant). So, of course, the engine had to come of >> the airplane and be completely disassembled for crank case replacement. >> >> Ruined cam: Upon splitting the case, I found significant pitting on >> several of the tappet bodies. The cam shaft had to be replaced, as did >> several tappet bodies. I got a lot of engine assembly assistance from a >> well regarded local repair station (Tom Schweitz at Aero Engines in >> Winchester, VA he's a super guy to work with). Tom told me that the >> cam & tappet damage was caused by rust forming on the cam shaft wear >> surface. I fly the RV-10 about 120 hours per year, which was apparently >> not adequate to prevent rust on the cam shaft wear surface. Following >> Tom's recommendation, I now use a Tempest engine dehumidifier to try to >> prevent a recurrence. >> >> CHTs too high (defective electronic ignition): Aero Engines provided me >> a very good price on a low time (1500 TTSN) narrow deck crank case. >> Since I had the engine torn down anyway, I elected to replace my >> existing cylinders (high time, but servicable) with new Lycoming >> cylinders. So I was expecting higher than normal CHTs on my first >> flights. I found, however, that CHTs remained high even after oil >> consumption had stabilized (beyond 10 hours). CHTs would climb above 430 >> on take off unless I reduced power at about 1000'. CHTs were nearly 430 >> in low level full throttle flight with mixture full rich. Baffling >> checks and all the other proven RV-10 cooling tips from Tim Olsen's >> wonderful web site didn't seem to help much. Eventually I began to >> suspect advanced timing (thanks, Mike Busch). I found that when I >> switched off the Lightspeed electronic ignition all my CHTs in climb and >> full power operation were normal. My mag timing was fine. Using an >> automotive strobe timing light, I discovered that the Lightspeed >> electronic ignition (EI) was stuck at 43 degrees BTDC (!!), and did not >> change timing based on manifold pressure. This is a very risky situation >> advanced timing reduces detonation margin. A borescope inspection >> revealed no signs of detonation damage. A recent Mike Busch webinar >> describes a brand new engine being destroyed by advanced timing, so I >> feel I dodged a bullet. >> >> I paid Lightspeed to repair the defective EI computer (bad connection on >> a timing capacitor, according to Klaus) and to update the hardware to >> the latest revision. After reinstalling the EI computer, all CHTs are >> now normal. >> >> Power stumble (air leak): At this point, I was hyper attuned to any >> engine performance abnormality. I noticed an occasional slight power >> reduction for a second or two at a time, when operating at lower power >> settings. Based on discussion with a Lycoming tech rep during OSH, I >> went on a hunt for any air leaking into the fuel lines. The Lycoming rep >> suggested the fuel flow transducer (red cube) as a frequent source of >> trouble (including cavitation bubbles). I torqued all fuel fittings >> firewall forward. Inside the cabin, I removed the red cube, and >> discovered evidence of a fuel seep at the fitting on the forward side of >> the cube. After considerable fiddling, I was able to achieve another >> turn on the fuel fitting without exceeding the red cube's torque spec. >> After reinstalling the red cube, the occasional power stumble in flight >> has not recurred. >> >> Several airplane experts have been very helpful to me in this process. >> Dick Koehler (IA, tech counselor, EAA Hints for Homebuilders webinar >> presenter) was an invaluable source of advice. Tom Schweitz at >> Winchester Aero Engines was fabulous to work with. He saved me a bunch >> of money on parts, and provided invaluable help getting the project >> finished. > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 12, 2014
From: Tim Lewis <TimRVator(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Engine marathon: Case crack, bad cam, high CHT, stumbling
I used Phillips XC 20W50 and Camguard for the whole 500 hours, except for break in. Oil analysis (every 50 hours) revealed nothing concerning. Oil filter inspection sometimes revealed a few very small amounts of tiny ferrous "hairs." Based on that data, I was quite surprised when we split my case and I saw the cratered face of a couple of my tappets. According to Tom at Aero Engines (a well regarded shop in this area), they almost never see this with flight school airplanes (which fly daily), but it is not uncommon with owner-flown aircraft. Tom showed me a pitted set from a recent Continental overhaul, to demonstrate that Lycomings aren't the only ones that have this happen. -- Tim Lewis -- HEF (Manassas, VA) A&P RV-6A N47TD -- 1104 hrs - sold RV-10 N31TD -- 500 hrs Tim Olson said the following on 9/12/2014 10:00 PM: > > Wow Tim, you really had the adventure lately! Thanks for posting. > Great tips for things people can look for. > I'm hoping I don't get rust on my cams, considering I'm not down > to about 100 hours per year or maybe even less. What oil are you > using, and are you using camguard? I'm still using exxon elite > for now, but bought 4 cases of Phillips X/C at OSH. Camguard from > everything I've read, is actually a worthwhile rust preventative, > so I'm going to stick with using it. Lots of good info from Aviation > consumer on it. Also, i think I just read within the last week or > two that Continental is going to be testing camguard. It sounds like > they find it intriguing as well. Maybe they'll make it one of their > recommendations officially some day. > > Anyway, just some questions for you. > Tim > > > On 9/12/2014 7:59 PM, Tim Lewis wrote: >> >> Case crack: During my RV-10 2014 Condition Inspection I found a small >> crack in the crank case under the #2 cylinder on my RV-10's IO-540. I >> had rebuilt the engine 500 hours earlier. I knew it was a high time case >> (6500 hours) with overhauled but high time cylinders, so I had paid >> extra attention to looking for cracks. Unfortunately, I found one >> (confirmed by dye penetrant). So, of course, the engine had to come of >> the airplane and be completely disassembled for crank case replacement. >> >> Ruined cam: Upon splitting the case, I found significant pitting on >> several of the tappet bodies. The cam shaft had to be replaced, as did >> several tappet bodies. I got a lot of engine assembly assistance from a >> well regarded local repair station (Tom Schweitz at Aero Engines in >> Winchester, VA he's a super guy to work with). Tom told me that the >> cam & tappet damage was caused by rust forming on the cam shaft wear >> surface. I fly the RV-10 about 120 hours per year, which was apparently >> not adequate to prevent rust on the cam shaft wear surface. Following >> Tom's recommendation, I now use a Tempest engine dehumidifier to try to >> prevent a recurrence. >> >> CHTs too high (defective electronic ignition): Aero Engines provided me >> a very good price on a low time (1500 TTSN) narrow deck crank case. >> Since I had the engine torn down anyway, I elected to replace my >> existing cylinders (high time, but servicable) with new Lycoming >> cylinders. So I was expecting higher than normal CHTs on my first >> flights. I found, however, that CHTs remained high even after oil >> consumption had stabilized (beyond 10 hours). CHTs would climb above 430 >> on take off unless I reduced power at about 1000'. CHTs were nearly 430 >> in low level full throttle flight with mixture full rich. Baffling >> checks and all the other proven RV-10 cooling tips from Tim Olsen's >> wonderful web site didn't seem to help much. Eventually I began to >> suspect advanced timing (thanks, Mike Busch). I found that when I >> switched off the Lightspeed electronic ignition all my CHTs in climb and >> full power operation were normal. My mag timing was fine. Using an >> automotive strobe timing light, I discovered that the Lightspeed >> electronic ignition (EI) was stuck at 43 degrees BTDC (!!), and did not >> change timing based on manifold pressure. This is a very risky situation >> advanced timing reduces detonation margin. A borescope inspection >> revealed no signs of detonation damage. A recent Mike Busch webinar >> describes a brand new engine being destroyed by advanced timing, so I >> feel I dodged a bullet. >> >> I paid Lightspeed to repair the defective EI computer (bad connection on >> a timing capacitor, according to Klaus) and to update the hardware to >> the latest revision. After reinstalling the EI computer, all CHTs are >> now normal. >> >> Power stumble (air leak): At this point, I was hyper attuned to any >> engine performance abnormality. I noticed an occasional slight power >> reduction for a second or two at a time, when operating at lower power >> settings. Based on discussion with a Lycoming tech rep during OSH, I >> went on a hunt for any air leaking into the fuel lines. The Lycoming rep >> suggested the fuel flow transducer (red cube) as a frequent source of >> trouble (including cavitation bubbles). I torqued all fuel fittings >> firewall forward. Inside the cabin, I removed the red cube, and >> discovered evidence of a fuel seep at the fitting on the forward side of >> the cube. After considerable fiddling, I was able to achieve another >> turn on the fuel fitting without exceeding the red cube's torque spec. >> After reinstalling the red cube, the occasional power stumble in flight >> has not recurred. >> >> Several airplane experts have been very helpful to me in this process. >> Dick Koehler (IA, tech counselor, EAA Hints for Homebuilders webinar >> presenter) was an invaluable source of advice. Tom Schweitz at >> Winchester Aero Engines was fabulous to work with. He saved me a bunch >> of money on parts, and provided invaluable help getting the project >> finished. >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Engine marathon: Case crack, bad cam, high CHT, stumbling
From: Justin Jones <jmjones2000(at)mindspring.com>
Date: Sep 12, 2014
Maybe it's time for a heated hangar. Engine overhauls get expensive!! On Sep 12, 2014, at 18:37, Tim Lewis wrote: > > I used Phillips XC 20W50 and Camguard for the whole 500 hours, except for break in. Oil analysis (every 50 hours) revealed nothing concerning. Oil filter inspection sometimes revealed a few very small amounts of tiny ferrous "hairs." Based on that data, I was quite surprised when we split my case and I saw the cratered face of a couple of my tappets. > > According to Tom at Aero Engines (a well regarded shop in this area), they almost never see this with flight school airplanes (which fly daily), but it is not uncommon with owner-flown aircraft. Tom showed me a pitted set from a recent Continental overhaul, to demonstrate that Lycomings aren't the only ones that have this happen. > > -- > Tim Lewis -- HEF (Manassas, VA) > A&P > RV-6A N47TD -- 1104 hrs - sold > RV-10 N31TD -- 500 hrs > > Tim Olson said the following on 9/12/2014 10:00 PM: >> >> Wow Tim, you really had the adventure lately! Thanks for posting. >> Great tips for things people can look for. >> I'm hoping I don't get rust on my cams, considering I'm not down >> to about 100 hours per year or maybe even less. What oil are you >> using, and are you using camguard? I'm still using exxon elite >> for now, but bought 4 cases of Phillips X/C at OSH. Camguard from >> everything I've read, is actually a worthwhile rust preventative, >> so I'm going to stick with using it. Lots of good info from Aviation >> consumer on it. Also, i think I just read within the last week or >> two that Continental is going to be testing camguard. It sounds like >> they find it intriguing as well. Maybe they'll make it one of their >> recommendations officially some day. >> >> Anyway, just some questions for you. >> Tim >> >> >> On 9/12/2014 7:59 PM, Tim Lewis wrote: >>> >>> Case crack: During my RV-10 2014 Condition Inspection I found a small >>> crack in the crank case under the #2 cylinder on my RV-10's IO-540. I >>> had rebuilt the engine 500 hours earlier. I knew it was a high time case >>> (6500 hours) with overhauled but high time cylinders, so I had paid >>> extra attention to looking for cracks. Unfortunately, I found one >>> (confirmed by dye penetrant). So, of course, the engine had to come of >>> the airplane and be completely disassembled for crank case replacement. >>> >>> Ruined cam: Upon splitting the case, I found significant pitting on >>> several of the tappet bodies. The cam shaft had to be replaced, as did >>> several tappet bodies. I got a lot of engine assembly assistance from a >>> well regarded local repair station (Tom Schweitz at Aero Engines in >>> Winchester, VA he's a super guy to work with). Tom told me that the >>> cam & tappet damage was caused by rust forming on the cam shaft wear >>> surface. I fly the RV-10 about 120 hours per year, which was apparently >>> not adequate to prevent rust on the cam shaft wear surface. Following >>> Tom's recommendation, I now use a Tempest engine dehumidifier to try to >>> prevent a recurrence. >>> >>> CHTs too high (defective electronic ignition): Aero Engines provided me >>> a very good price on a low time (1500 TTSN) narrow deck crank case. >>> Since I had the engine torn down anyway, I elected to replace my >>> existing cylinders (high time, but servicable) with new Lycoming >>> cylinders. So I was expecting higher than normal CHTs on my first >>> flights. I found, however, that CHTs remained high even after oil >>> consumption had stabilized (beyond 10 hours). CHTs would climb above 430 >>> on take off unless I reduced power at about 1000'. CHTs were nearly 430 >>> in low level full throttle flight with mixture full rich. Baffling >>> checks and all the other proven RV-10 cooling tips from Tim Olsen's >>> wonderful web site didn't seem to help much. Eventually I began to >>> suspect advanced timing (thanks, Mike Busch). I found that when I >>> switched off the Lightspeed electronic ignition all my CHTs in climb and >>> full power operation were normal. My mag timing was fine. Using an >>> automotive strobe timing light, I discovered that the Lightspeed >>> electronic ignition (EI) was stuck at 43 degrees BTDC (!!), and did not >>> change timing based on manifold pressure. This is a very risky situation >>> advanced timing reduces detonation margin. A borescope inspection >>> revealed no signs of detonation damage. A recent Mike Busch webinar >>> describes a brand new engine being destroyed by advanced timing, so I >>> feel I dodged a bullet. >>> >>> I paid Lightspeed to repair the defective EI computer (bad connection on >>> a timing capacitor, according to Klaus) and to update the hardware to >>> the latest revision. After reinstalling the EI computer, all CHTs are >>> now normal. >>> >>> Power stumble (air leak): At this point, I was hyper attuned to any >>> engine performance abnormality. I noticed an occasional slight power >>> reduction for a second or two at a time, when operating at lower power >>> settings. Based on discussion with a Lycoming tech rep during OSH, I >>> went on a hunt for any air leaking into the fuel lines. The Lycoming rep >>> suggested the fuel flow transducer (red cube) as a frequent source of >>> trouble (including cavitation bubbles). I torqued all fuel fittings >>> firewall forward. Inside the cabin, I removed the red cube, and >>> discovered evidence of a fuel seep at the fitting on the forward side of >>> the cube. After considerable fiddling, I was able to achieve another >>> turn on the fuel fitting without exceeding the red cube's torque spec. >>> After reinstalling the red cube, the occasional power stumble in flight >>> has not recurred. >>> >>> Several airplane experts have been very helpful to me in this process. >>> Dick Koehler (IA, tech counselor, EAA Hints for Homebuilders webinar >>> presenter) was an invaluable source of advice. Tom Schweitz at >>> Winchester Aero Engines was fabulous to work with. He saved me a bunch >>> of money on parts, and provided invaluable help getting the project >>> finished. > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Glassing over cowl rivets
From: "rvdave" <rv610dave(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 12, 2014
Just wondering the best method for covering cowl hinge rivets. I don't want a high buildup so I'm thinking about one layer of glass topped with resin/ flox or glass fibers for better sanding. Or should I skip the glass and just go with a sand able product. I've been using 2 part Fiber-Fil mixed with acetone with good results for pinholes and overall feathering but need something with a little higher buildup without going extreme. What have your experiences been for something like this? -------- Dave Ford RV6 flying RV10 building Cadillac, MI Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430465#430465 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 12, 2014
From: Linn Walters <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Glassing over cowl rivets
I'm using UV Smoothprime. Fills and sands great. I really hate to spend all that money to spray the stuff on and sand most of it off!!! Linn On 9/12/2014 10:47 PM, rvdave wrote: > > Just wondering the best method for covering cowl hinge rivets. I don't want a high buildup so I'm thinking about one layer of glass topped with resin/ flox or glass fibers for better sanding. Or should I skip the glass and just go with a sand able product. I've been using 2 part Fiber-Fil mixed with acetone with good results for pinholes and overall feathering but need something with a little higher buildup without going extreme. What have your experiences been for something like this? > > -------- > Dave Ford > RV6 flying > RV10 building > Cadillac, MI > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430465#430465 > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: David Saylor <saylor.dave(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 12, 2014
Subject: Re: Glassing over cowl rivets
Best practice would be a layer of very light cloth over the rivet line. Something like ACS P/N 1080-50 would be ideal. Works over the window joints too. --Dave On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 7:47 PM, rvdave wrote: > > Just wondering the best method for covering cowl hinge rivets. I don't > want a high buildup so I'm thinking about one layer of glass topped with > resin/ flox or glass fibers for better sanding. Or should I skip the glass > and just go with a sand able product. I've been using 2 part Fiber-Fil > mixed with acetone with good results for pinholes and overall feathering > but need something with a little higher buildup without going extreme. > What have your experiences been for something like this? > > -------- > Dave Ford > RV6 flying > RV10 building > Cadillac, MI > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430465#430465 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Danny Riggs <jdriggs49(at)msn.com>
Subject: Glassing over cowl rivets
Date: Sep 12, 2014
Presuming I have adequately set the rivets=2C they will be in a slight depr ession and I've used micro balloons and resin. Works well and sands well. > Subject: RV10-List: Glassing over cowl rivets > From: rv610dave(at)gmail.com > Date: Fri=2C 12 Sep 2014 19:47:35 -0700 > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > > > Just wondering the best method for covering cowl hinge rivets. I don't w ant a high buildup so I'm thinking about one layer of glass topped with res in/ flox or glass fibers for better sanding. Or should I skip the glass an d just go with a sand able product. I've been using 2 part Fiber-Fil mixed with acetone with good results for pinholes and overall feathering but need something with a little higher buildup without going extreme. What have y our experiences been for something like this? > > -------- > Dave Ford > RV6 flying > RV10 building > Cadillac=2C MI > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430465#430465 > > > > > > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Engine marathon: Case crack, bad cam, high CHT, stumbling
From: "Mike Whisky" <rv-10(at)wellenzohn.net>
Date: Sep 13, 2014
Does any engineer or metallurgist now why parts like cam shafts are not made of an none corrosive steel alloy? Just reviewing to understand why not the root cause has been tackled in the past by the engine manufacturers. I guess that problems like this won't appear in automotive engines. Just my 20cc Mike -------- RV-10 builder (flying) #511 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430483#430483 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 13, 2014
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Engine removal for SB 14-08-29
Has anyone been successful mounting the engine to the engine mount with the prop installed? During initial construction, I had the opportunity demount and remount the engine. During this the second mounting I attempted to keep the prop installed on the engine but found it difficult/impossible to get the assembly on the engine mount. I then removed the prop and found the process to once again be quite easy. Any insight or experience here welcome. Bill "executing delay maneuvers before tackling engine removal" Watson ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 13, 2014
From: Linn Walters <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Engine removal for SB 14-08-29
I've done it both ways .... and both ways are a PITA. Can't say which way was easier. Instead of using both lift rings (no prop) I used the aft ring and a strap around the prop blades at the hub (with prop). I find it easier to put the engine on the mount using smaller dia. bolts and then replacing them, one at a time, with the correct bolts. Linn On 9/13/2014 2:04 PM, Bill Watson wrote: > > Has anyone been successful mounting the engine to the engine mount > with the prop installed? > > During initial construction, I had the opportunity demount and remount > the engine. During this the second mounting I attempted to keep the > prop installed on the engine but found it difficult/impossible to get > the assembly on the engine mount. > > I then removed the prop and found the process to once again be quite > easy. > > Any insight or experience here welcome. > > Bill "executing delay maneuvers before tackling engine removal" Watson > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rene" <rene(at)felker.com>
Subject: Engine removal for SB 14-08-29
Date: Sep 13, 2014
During my initial build I found a crack in my nose wheel strut. Vans sent me a new one. To replace it. I left the engine mounted to the engine mount and removed the engine mount from the firewall. Replaced the strut and then remounted the assembly to the firewall. I did not have all the wiring done at that time...... Just FYI, not sure it is an option since you have to remove more than the strut to affect the repair. Rene' N423CF 801-721-6080 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Watson Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2014 12:04 PM Subject: RV10-List: Engine removal for SB 14-08-29 Has anyone been successful mounting the engine to the engine mount with the prop installed? During initial construction, I had the opportunity demount and remount the engine. During this the second mounting I attempted to keep the prop installed on the engine but found it difficult/impossible to get the assembly on the engine mount. I then removed the prop and found the process to once again be quite easy. Any insight or experience here welcome. Bill "executing delay maneuvers before tackling engine removal" Watson ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 13, 2014
From: Werner Schneider <glastar(at)gmx.net>
Subject: Re: Engine marathon: Case crack, bad cam, high CHT, stumbling
On 13.09.2014 02:59, Tim Lewis wrote: > Ruined cam: Upon splitting the case, I found significant pitting on > several of the tappet bodies. The cam shaft had to be replaced, as did > several tappet bodies. I got a lot of engine assembly assistance from > a well regarded local repair station (Tom Schweitz at Aero Engines in > Winchester, VA he's a super guy to work with). Tom told me that the > cam & tappet damage was caused by rust forming on the cam shaft wear > surface. I fly the RV-10 about 120 hours per year, which was > apparently not adequate to prevent rust on the cam shaft wear surface. > Following Tom's recommendation, I now use a Tempest engine > dehumidifier to try to prevent a recurrence. Tim, I know how painful this is, I had an O-320 with exactly that issue, I can tell you, if you see in the filter this fine shiny metal flakes be aware to expect cam shaft troubles. I had as well oil analysis done all the time, it showed a bit higher metal values but nowhere in an area regarded as dangerous. I was as well far away from the Coming SL describing how much metal you can have. At the end Lycoming steered me to their SB 480 http://www.lycoming.com/Portals/0/techpublications/servicebulletins/SB%20480E%20%2804-13-2005%29/Oil%20and%20Filter%20Change%20and%20Screen%20Cleaning;%20Oil%20Filter-Screen%20Content%20Inspection.pdf which more or less tells you latest all 4 month you have to change oil and filter .... Cheers Werner ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Engine marathon: Case crack, bad cam, high CHT, stumbling
From: Justin Jones <jmjones2000(at)mindspring.com>
Date: Sep 13, 2014
Has anyone considered the Ney Nozzels? I have heard of one guy that had oil pressure issues after he had them put in, but I'm not sure if it was ever attributed to the nozzles or another defective part. If memory serves me correctly, he may have found a missing oil galley plug on a subsequent shut down. The nozzles will help while the engine is running, but most if the corrosion comes from the aircraft sitting out in the elements. Condensation builds on the camshaft after a warm engine is shut down. This is where ASL Camguard claims to help. It is not suppose to shear off of the camshaft after shutdown, leaving a coat of oil covering the cam and stopping corrosion. The other thing that will wear a camshaft down quickly is allowing the lycoming to idle below 1,000 rpm. I am not advocating to set the idle higher than the manufacturer recommends, but our lycoming engines rely on splash oil to lubricate the camshaft. There is simply not enough splash oil below 1000 rpm to sufficiently lubricate the cam. I try to limit my time below 1000 rpm. The dehydrating plugs couldn't hurt to slide in after shutdown. Hope this helps Justin On Sep 13, 2014, at 11:48, Werner Schneider wrote: > > > On 13.09.2014 02:59, Tim Lewis wrote: > >> Ruined cam: Upon splitting the case, I found significant pitting on several of the tappet bodies. The cam shaft had to be replaced, as did several tappet bodies. I got a lot of engine assembly assistance from a well regarded local repair station (Tom Schweitz at Aero Engines in Winchester, VA he's a super guy to work with). Tom told me that the cam & tappet damage was caused by rust forming on the cam shaft wear surface. I fly the RV-10 about 120 hours per year, which was apparently not adequate to prevent rust on the cam shaft wear surface. Following Tom's recommendation, I now use a Tempest engine dehumidifier to try to prevent a recurrence. > > Tim, I know how painful this is, I had an O-320 with exactly that issue, I can tell you, if you see in the filter this fine shiny metal flakes be aware to expect cam shaft troubles. I had as well oil analysis done all the time, it showed a bit higher metal values but nowhere in an area regarded as dangerous. I was as well far away from the Coming SL describing how much metal you can have. At the end Lycoming steered me to their SB 480 > > http://www.lycoming.com/Portals/0/techpublications/servicebulletins/SB%20480E%20%2804-13-2005%29/Oil%20and%20Filter%20Change%20and%20Screen%20Cleaning;%20Oil%20Filter-Screen%20Content%20Inspection.pdf > > which more or less tells you latest all 4 month you have to change oil and filter .... > > Cheers Werner > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 13, 2014
Subject: Re: Engine marathon: Case crack, bad cam, high CHT, stumbling
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
The Lycoming is particularly vulnerable because the cam is in the top of the crankcase, and isn't operated daily. The cam normally is nitrided which makes it more vulnerable to corrosion. (OTOH it makes the wear surface very hard to withstand the high loads of the cam lobes.) Auto engines run lower temps, get more oil, usually with positive lube of the cam, where Lycomings generally are splash lubricated. Reground cams are a mixed bag, depending on the quality of the regrind and whether the lifters are new, how well the cam is nitrided after grinding, etc. I had to overhaul a 200 hp Lycoming at 1300 hours, 11 yrs after it had been overhauled, due to cam and lifters badly spalled. So frequency of use didn't help it much either. On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Mike Whisky wrote: > > Does any engineer or metallurgist now why parts like cam shafts are not > made of an none corrosive steel alloy? Just reviewing to understand why not > the root cause has been tackled in the past by the engine manufacturers. I > guess that problems like this won't appear in automotive engines. > > Just my 20cc > Mike > > -------- > RV-10 builder (flying) > #511 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430483#430483 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 13, 2014
Subject: Re: Engine removal for SB 14-08-29
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
One very helpful item is to have a load leveling bar on the hoist, which lets you tilt the engine quite a bit forward or aft as needed. IIRC they are not terribly expensive at Harbor freight, or you may be able to borrow one. On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Rene wrote: > > During my initial build I found a crack in my nose wheel strut. Vans sent > me a new one. To replace it. I left the engine mounted to the engine > mount > and removed the engine mount from the firewall. Replaced the strut and > then > remounted the assembly to the firewall. I did not have all the wiring done > at that time...... > > Just FYI, not sure it is an option since you have to remove more than the > strut to affect the repair. > > Rene' > N423CF > 801-721-6080 > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Watson > Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2014 12:04 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Engine removal for SB 14-08-29 > > > Has anyone been successful mounting the engine to the engine mount with the > prop installed? > > During initial construction, I had the opportunity demount and remount > the engine. During this the second mounting I attempted to keep the > prop installed on the engine but found it difficult/impossible to get the > assembly on the engine mount. > > I then removed the prop and found the process to once again be quite easy. > > Any insight or experience here welcome. > > Bill "executing delay maneuvers before tackling engine removal" Watson > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Fuel valve plate
From: "rvdave" <rv610dave(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 14, 2014
Looking to get and mount Vans fuel valve plate but it says not for the Rv10. I thought I've seen others use that so wondering what's up with that? -------- Dave Ford RV6 flying RV10 building Cadillac, MI Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430535#430535 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fuel valve plate
From: "rvdave" <rv610dave(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 14, 2014
I did find a thread regarding not fitting the newer style Vans valve but I have the older valve apparently with aerosport console so not sure about dimensions of the plate--anyone have photos of similar install or info? -------- Dave Ford RV6 flying RV10 building Cadillac, MI Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430537#430537 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fuel valve plate
From: Jesse Saint <jesse(at)saintaviation.com>
Date: Sep 14, 2014
I have used it before. I think I had to drill out the center hole a little bigger than it comes. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse(at)itecusa.org www.itecusa.org www.mavericklsa.com C: 352-427-0285 O: 352-465-4545 F: 815-377-3694 Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 14, 2014, at 5:35 PM, "rvdave" wrote: > > > Looking to get and mount Vans fuel valve plate but it says not for the Rv10. I thought I've seen others use that so wondering what's up with that? > > -------- > Dave Ford > RV6 flying > RV10 building > Cadillac, MI > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430535#430535 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
From: "bill.peyton" <peyton.b(at)sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sep 15, 2014
I completed installation of the SB this last week. Approximately 2 years and 325 hours. I had installed two shims in the 325 hours flown thus far. All operations were paved runways. No cracks were found, just a slight wearing of the powder coat. I did note that slight abrasion was occurring on one side of the strut where it was rubbing on the engine mount inside hole diameter similar to what Tim O had noticed. I reinstalled strut using 1 1/2 shims with a 200 lb preload at propeller. I also used a bead of high-temp RTV to attach the shim. the entire shim was painted prior to installation -------- Bill WA0SYV Aviation Partners, LLC Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430559#430559 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 15, 2014
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
I'm curious why folks are choosing RTV over ProSeal to attach the doubler. ProSeal has much stronger bond, is impervious to most oils and gas, which RTV is not, etc. I suppose those with QB wings might not have any on hand, but I would expect everyone that did fuel tanks would have some left over. Making a 5 gram batch isn't hard, was just enough for the doubler...really a little much with what oozed out. On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:45 AM, bill.peyton wrote: > > I completed installation of the SB this last week. Approximately 2 years > and 325 hours. I had installed two shims in the 325 hours flown thus far. > All operations were paved runways. No cracks were found, just a slight > wearing of the powder coat. I did note that slight abrasion was occurring > on one side of the strut where it was rubbing on the engine mount inside > hole diameter similar to what Tim O had noticed. I reinstalled strut using > 1 1/2 shims with a 200 lb preload at propeller. I also used a bead of > high-temp RTV to attach the shim. the entire shim was painted prior to > installation > > -------- > Bill > WA0SYV > Aviation Partners, LLC > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430559#430559 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Phillip Perry <philperry9(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
Date: Sep 15, 2014
Good points. I was thinking of a mechanical bond with #8 screws and possibly sealing with proseal. I don't have the parts, so I don't know if that's possible. Curious to hea r if thats possible. Phil Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 15, 2014, at 1:22 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > > I'm curious why folks are choosing RTV over ProSeal to attach the doubler. ProSeal has much stronger bond, is impervious to most oils and gas, which R TV is not, etc. > I suppose those with QB wings might not have any on hand, but I would expe ct everyone that did fuel tanks would have some left over. Making a 5 gram b atch isn't hard, was just enough for the doubler...really a little much with what oozed out. > >> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:45 AM, bill.peyton wro te: >> >> I completed installation of the SB this last week. Approximately 2 years a nd 325 hours. I had installed two shims in the 325 hours flown thus far. All operations were paved runways. No cracks were found, just a slight wearing of the powder coat. I did note that slight abrasion was occurring on one s ide of the strut where it was rubbing on the engine mount inside hole diamet er similar to what Tim O had noticed. I reinstalled strut using 1 1/2 shims with a 200 lb preload at propeller. I also used a bead of high-temp RTV to attach the shim. the entire shim was painted prior to installation >> >> -------- >> Bill >> WA0SYV >> Aviation Partners, LLC >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430559#430559 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ========== >> target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> ========== >> ">http://forums.matronics.com >> ========== >> le, List Admin. >> ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> ========== > > > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 15, 2014
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
I had proseal available from the RV-14 build, but, I still used RTV. Part of it was BECAUSE it has an easier bond to break, actually. It will allow at least an easier possibility of removing the part at a later date. It also is good for >500F in temp, and I had it at the hangar. It's a very very thin layer as you noticed, so gas/oil really won't be an issue either way...and RTV is a sealer for oil pans and such anyway. So I did it because it was simpler and quick. Also, if Van's doesn't see a need to even secure it in the first place, then sticking it together with RTV should be a big step up from that. I don't see that Proseal would really do any more for the situation other than be harder to separate some day. In fact, the paint will probably peel off before the proseal or RTV would anyway. So in short, I just didn't see that it was necessary to go that far. Tim On 9/15/2014 1:22 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > I'm curious why folks are choosing RTV over ProSeal to attach the > doubler. ProSeal has much stronger bond, is impervious to most oils and > gas, which RTV is not, etc. > I suppose those with QB wings might not have any on hand, but I would > expect everyone that did fuel tanks would have some left over. Making a > 5 gram batch isn't hard, was just enough for the doubler...really a > little much with what oozed out. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jesse Saint <jesse(at)saintaviation.com>
Subject: Re: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL
Date: Sep 15, 2014
We are planning for October 11. Hope to see you here. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. jesse(at)saintaviation.com C: 352-427-0285 F: 815-377-3694 On Sep 11, 2014, at 2:21 PM, LEON EVERETT wrote: > Sounds great! I'd be interested. 2.7 hours from 2M2. Oct 4 or 11? > Leon Everett > > From: jesse(at)saintaviation.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL > Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 07:26:42 -0400 > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > > It's near Ocala in north Florida. > > Jesse Saint > Saint Aviation, Inc. > 352-427-0285 > jesse(at)saintaviation.com > > Sent from my iPad > > On Sep 10, 2014, at 11:08 PM, Danny Riggs wrote: > > Where is X35??! > > > From: rv10flyer(at)live.com > > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > > Subject: Re: RV10-List: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL > > Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:14:39 -0700 > > > > > > great idea Jesse! Sorry! done my Florida trip for the year, but I would have > > joined to finally make it out to X35. > > Pascal > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jesse Saint > > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 6:53 PM > > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > > Subject: RV10-List: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL > > > > > > I have been wanting to do this for a while, and have done it in the past. In > > the next month or so I would like to have a day, probably a Saturday, that > > we can get a bunch of RV-10's together from the SE to our place at X35. We > > would plan to BBQ and hang out and talk RV-10's, but I was just thinking > > that it might be a great time to get people together to do the new SB > > inspections and fix, probably at least for no-cracks planes. Please post > > here if you would be interested in something like this and what day or days > > would work best in the next 4-6 weeks to do it. A plus is that we have > > equipment to powder coat and also have some spare parts for those areas in > > case they are needed. > > > > For those traveling further than comfortable for a single day, we could > > probably arrange either accommodations, or a place to camp, or a ride to a > > hotel as needed. > > > > Jesse Saint > > Saint Aviation, Inc. > > 352-427-0285 > > jesse(at)saintaviation.com > > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > > > > &======================== == --> http://www================== ============= > > > > > > > > > D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D > List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D > //forums.matronics.com > D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D > ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D > > > > ist" target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > ank>http://forums.matronics.com > rget=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL
From: David Jones <d.j.goneflyin(at)earthlink.net>
Date: Sep 15, 2014
Hi Jesse, I will be returning from Kennebunkport, Me. on Oct. 18, so I will miss y our Barbecue. Mary Elizabeth went to your last one several years ago and really enjoyed. M aybe some other time. Best Regard, David Jones Cell: 941-661-4926 Sent from my iPad > On Sep 15, 2014, at 3:38 PM, Jesse Saint wrote: > > We are planning for October 11. Hope to see you here. > > Jesse Saint > Saint Aviation, Inc. > jesse(at)saintaviation.com > C: 352-427-0285 > F: 815-377-3694 > >> On Sep 11, 2014, at 2:21 PM, LEON EVERETT wrote: >> >> Sounds great! I'd be interested. 2.7 hours from 2M2. Oct 4 or 11? >> Leon Everett >> >> From: jesse(at)saintaviation.com >> Subject: Re: RV10-List: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL >> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 07:26:42 -0400 >> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >> >> It's near Ocala in north Florida. >> >> Jesse Saint >> Saint Aviation, Inc. >> 352-427-0285 >> jesse(at)saintaviation.com >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On Sep 10, 2014, at 11:08 PM, Danny Riggs wrote: >> >> Where is X35??! >> >> > From: rv10flyer(at)live.com >> > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >> > Subject: Re: RV10-List: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL >> > Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:14:39 -0700 >> > >> > >> > great idea Jesse! Sorry! done my Florida trip for the year, but I would have >> > joined to finally make it out to X35. >> > Pascal >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Jesse Saint >> > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 6:53 PM >> > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >> > Subject: RV10-List: RV-10 Fly-in and SB day in FL >> > >> > >> > I have been wanting to do this for a while, and have done it in the pas t. In >> > the next month or so I would like to have a day, probably a Saturday, t hat >> > we can get a bunch of RV-10's together from the SE to our place at X35. We >> > would plan to BBQ and hang out and talk RV-10's, but I was just thinkin g >> > that it might be a great time to get people together to do the new SB >> > inspections and fix, probably at least for no-cracks planes. Please pos t >> > here if you would be interested in something like this and what day or d ays >> > would work best in the next 4-6 weeks to do it. A plus is that we have >> > equipment to powder coat and also have some spare parts for those areas in >> > case they are needed. >> > >> > For those traveling further than comfortable for a single day, we could >> > probably arrange either accommodations, or a place to camp, or a ride t o a >> > hotel as needed. >> > >> > Jesse Saint >> > Saint Aviation, Inc. >> > 352-427-0285 >> > jesse(at)saintaviation.com >> > >> > Sent from my iPad >> > >> > >> > >> &======================== == --> http://www=================== ============ >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> //forums.matronics.com >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> >> >> >> ist" target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> ank>http://forums.matronics.com >> rget=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> >> >> >> href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronic s.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> href="http://forums.matronics.com/">http://forums.matronics.com >> href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c ontribution >> > > > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
From: "dmaib(at)me.com" <dmaib(at)me.com>
Date: Sep 15, 2014
Started my nose gear SB last week and could not get the WD-1015 collar assembly off. Tried hard for a couple of days, but it would not budge. Called Jesse Saint over in Dunnellon at X35 and arranged to take the airplane to him this morning. Jesse and his team finally managed to get the collar off. A bit of corrosion on the top of the link assembly was the reason I could not get it off, as we suspected. Anyway, no cracks. :D The whole job took just a bit over two hours, which included removing and reinstalling the cowling. Jesse and his team at Saint Aviation are excellent and I would recommend them to anyone needing some professional help with RV-10 maintenance. 750 hours in 5 1/2 years operated on hard surface most of the time. Most of the grass strips I have landed on have been exceptionally smooth. The only exception to that is some transition training I did for a couple of pilots that requested grass field work. I used Pierson, FL, 2j8, and Bob Lee Strip, 1j6, near Deland, FL and they were both pretty rough. I have used the airplane for Transition Training for the past three years, so had some concerns because of the high number of landings. (I have not kept track of the number of landings on the airplane) Happy to report that the nose gear was in great shape. Jesse and I talked about the use of RTV on the doubler, and he, of course, said it was up to me whether to use it or not. He has used it on the other airplanes he has done. I elected to use it for the same reasons Tim Olson listed. If you are in central FL, stop at X35 and visit Jesse. His operation is impressive. Some of the cheapest 100LL in the area, as well. -------- David Maib RV-10 #40559 New Smyrna Beach, FL Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430582#430582 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu>
Date: Sep 15, 2014
Dave, Any particular trick they used to get the collar off? I recall that on installation mine was very tight; I'm not looking forward to removing it. Bob -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430585#430585 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jesse Saint <jesse(at)saintaviation.com>
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
Date: Sep 15, 2014
Maybe we should keep that between us. Actually, we pulled the nose gear, put a pipe wrench on the hat and a rod in the bottom of the shaft and two guys were able to "break" the corrosion, then it popped right off. We cleaned the corrosion and greased it and put it back together. The pipe wrench made surprisingly small nicks in the top of the hat, which we filed off and painted. We had a backup in case it was damaged beyond comfortable reuse, but with the strength of the hat, it was not enough damage to replace it. That is not the weak link in the nose gear anyway (ask me how I know). Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. 352-427-0285 jesse(at)saintaviation.com Sent from my iPad > On Sep 15, 2014, at 5:53 PM, "Bob Turner" wrote: > > > Dave, > > Any particular trick they used to get the collar off? I recall that on installation mine was very tight; I'm not looking forward to removing it. > > Bob > > -------- > Bob Turner > RV-10 QB > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430585#430585 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
From: "Mike Whisky" <rv-10(at)wellenzohn.net>
Date: Sep 16, 2014
I just thought to post a picture of the doubler. Michael -------- RV-10 builder (flying) #511 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430596#430596 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/image_869.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 16, 2014
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
FWIW, I wasn't looking forward to that particular step but mine came right off. Could be a coastal problem or something. Bill "slowly removing the engine" Watson On 9/15/2014 5:53 PM, Bob Turner wrote: > > Dave, > > Any particular trick they used to get the collar off? I recall that on installation mine was very tight; I'm not looking forward to removing it. > > Bob > > -------- > Bob Turner > RV-10 QB > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430585#430585 > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 16, 2014
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Probably a good idea to grease the inside of the collar before re-installing. I greased the washer/shim as well. Don't know that there is much movement or corrosion risk, but why not minimize risk. On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Bill Watson wrote: > > FWIW, I wasn't looking forward to that particular step but mine came right > off. Could be a coastal problem or something. > > Bill "slowly removing the engine" Watson > > On 9/15/2014 5:53 PM, Bob Turner wrote: > >> >> Dave, >> >> Any particular trick they used to get the collar off? I recall that on >> installation mine was very tight; I'm not looking forward to removing it. >> >> Bob >> >> -------- >> Bob Turner >> RV-10 QB >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430585#430585 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 16, 2014
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
Mine came off easily, thanks to the engine oil leaks I've had over the past year. :) Thankfully no oil on the rubber elastomers though. When I reassembled, I cleaned it all up and also greased inside the cap, on the upper shaft, on the shim washers, and down to the very top of the elastomers...hoping that maybe this would at least help against further shaft wear. Tim On 9/16/2014 2:33 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > Probably a good idea to grease the inside of the collar before > re-installing. I greased the washer/shim as well. Don't know that there > is much movement or corrosion risk, but why not minimize risk. > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Trip interest
From: PReid <Rv10flyer(at)live.com>
Date: Sep 16, 2014
Reviving to see if this idea is still on the table? > On Aug 16, 2014, at 10:22 AM, Deems Davis wrote: > > Myron, > > Ed Hayden just called and poked me about this. Judy and I have taken trips with Ed & Shelia before and have had a ball. We're interested . I don't en vy you trying to put this togethe, but hope you suceed? What's the smallest g roup that makes this viable? would love to > > >> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:16 AM, woxofswa wrote: >> >> One of my first flying jobs almost 30 years ago was as a dashing young to ur pilot in the Grand Canyon, Lake Powell, Monument Valley area. >> I am looking into the potential interest of putting together a Color Coun try Caravan of 6-10 RV-10's (10ish couples) who would be interested in a 3 d ay 2 night joint loosely guided expedition in that area with overnights at B ar10 ranch (GC) and >> Goulding's lodge (MV). >> >> I'm thinking a Thurs/Fri/Sat type thing starting in Sedona perhaps late S ept. >> >> I am just gauging interest prior to coming up with a hard itinerary/cost/ reservations, etc. >> >> Myron >> woxof(at)aol.com >> 602 421-2868 >> >> -------- >> Myron Nelson >> Mesa, AZ >> Flew May 10 2014 >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=428451#428451 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ========== >> -List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> ========== >> FORUMS - >> _blank">http://forums.matronics.com >> ========== >> b Site - >> -Matt Dralle, List Admin. >> target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> ========== > > > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 16, 2014
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Trip interest
Last I talked to Myron he was planning the trip with Deems and one other couple. I believe the issue was number of simultaneous reservations that could be obtained. However, Myron has been dealing with his engine squirting oil from underneath the starter, where there are no oil passages, and no evidence where it is coming from(everywhere above, in front of and behind the starter are dry except for areas downwind or below the starter). I don't know at this point how that impacts his trip. On 9/16/2014 4:32 PM, PReid wrote: > Reviving to see if this idea is still on the table? > > On Aug 16, 2014, at 10:22 AM, Deems Davis > wrote: > >> Myron, >> >> Ed Hayden just called and poked me about this. Judy and I have taken >> trips with Ed & Shelia before and have had a ball. We're interested >> . I don't envy you trying to put this togethe, but hope you suceed? >> What's the smallest group that makes this viable? would love to >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:16 AM, woxofswa > > wrote: >> >> > >> >> One of my first flying jobs almost 30 years ago was as a dashing >> young tour pilot in the Grand Canyon, Lake Powell, Monument >> Valley area. >> I am looking into the potential interest of putting together a >> Color Country Caravan of 6-10 RV-10's (10ish couples) who would >> be interested in a 3 day 2 night joint loosely guided expedition >> in that area with overnights at Bar10 ranch (GC) and >> Goulding's lodge (MV). >> >> I'm thinking a Thurs/Fri/Sat type thing starting in Sedona >> perhaps late Sept. >> >> I am just gauging interest prior to coming up with a hard >> itinerary/cost/reservations, etc. >> >> Myron >> woxof(at)aol.com >> 602 421-2868 >> >> -------- >> Myron Nelson >> Mesa, AZ >> Flew May 10 2014 >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=428451#428451 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ========== >> -List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> ========== >> FORUMS - >> _blank">http://forums.matronics.com >> ========== >> b Site - >> -Matt Dralle, List Admin. >> target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> ========== >> >> >> >> >> * >> >> >> * > * > > > * ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 16, 2014
Subject: Re: Trip interest
From: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
I think this is till something that Myron is planning on. He ran into an issue with reservations for the number of people that were interested. The end of Sept is the end of the season for the places he was planning on, and they were mostly booked and couldn't accommodate a large group. I think he plans on targeting next spring. On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:32 PM, PReid wrote: > Reviving to see if this idea is still on the table? > > On Aug 16, 2014, at 10:22 AM, Deems Davis wrote: > > Myron, > > Ed Hayden just called and poked me about this. Judy and I have taken trips > with Ed & Shelia before and have had a ball. We're interested . I don't > envy you trying to put this togethe, but hope you suceed? What's the > smallest group that makes this viable? would love to > > > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:16 AM, woxofswa wrote: > >> >> One of my first flying jobs almost 30 years ago was as a dashing young >> tour pilot in the Grand Canyon, Lake Powell, Monument Valley area. >> I am looking into the potential interest of putting together a Color >> Country Caravan of 6-10 RV-10's (10ish couples) who would be interested in >> a 3 day 2 night joint loosely guided expedition in that area with >> overnights at Bar10 ranch (GC) and >> Goulding's lodge (MV). >> >> I'm thinking a Thurs/Fri/Sat type thing starting in Sedona perhaps late >> Sept. >> >> I am just gauging interest prior to coming up with a hard >> itinerary/cost/reservations, etc. >> >> Myron >> woxof(at)aol.com >> 602 421-2868 >> >> -------- >> Myron Nelson >> Mesa, AZ >> Flew May 10 2014 >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=428451#428451 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ========== >> -List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> ========== >> FORUMS - >> _blank">http://forums.matronics.com >> ========== >> b Site - >> -Matt Dralle, List Admin. >> target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> ========== >> >> >> >> > > > * > > > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Trip interest
From: PReid <Rv10flyer(at)live.com>
Date: Sep 16, 2014
Works for me, better actually. Thanks for update. Pascal > On Sep 16, 2014, at 5:37 PM, Deems Davis wrote: > > I think this is till something that Myron is planning on. He ran into an i ssue with reservations for the number of people that were interested. The en d of Sept is the end of the season for the places he was planning on, and th ey were mostly booked and couldn't accommodate a large group. I think he pla ns on targeting next spring. > >> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:32 PM, PReid wrote: >> Reviving to see if this idea is still on the table? >> >>> On Aug 16, 2014, at 10:22 AM, Deems Davis wrote: >>> >>> Myron, >>> >>> Ed Hayden just called and poked me about this. Judy and I have taken tri ps with Ed & Shelia before and have had a ball. We're interested . I don't e nvy you trying to put this togethe, but hope you suceed? What's the smallest group that makes this viable? would love to >>> >>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:16 AM, woxofswa wrote: >>>> >>>> One of my first flying jobs almost 30 years ago was as a dashing young t our pilot in the Grand Canyon, Lake Powell, Monument Valley area. >>>> I am looking into the potential interest of putting together a Color Co untry Caravan of 6-10 RV-10's (10ish couples) who would be interested in a 3 day 2 night joint loosely guided expedition in that area with overnights at Bar10 ranch (GC) and >>>> Goulding's lodge (MV). >>>> >>>> I'm thinking a Thurs/Fri/Sat type thing starting in Sedona perhaps late Sept. >>>> >>>> I am just gauging interest prior to coming up with a hard itinerary/cos t/reservations, etc. >>>> >>>> Myron >>>> woxof(at)aol.com >>>> 602 421-2868 >>>> >>>> -------- >>>> Myron Nelson >>>> Mesa, AZ >>>> Flew May 10 2014 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Read this topic online here: >>>> >>>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=428451#428451 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ========== >>>> -List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >>>> ========== >>>> FORUMS - >>>> _blank">http://forums.matronics.com >>>> ========== >>>> b Site - >>>> -Matt Dralle, List Admin. >>>> target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >>>> ========== >>> >> >> >> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> > > > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 16, 2014
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
From: Rick Lark <larkrv10(at)gmail.com>
Hey all Had a fellow in my assembly facility (garage) today who suggested using epoxy that is specifically made for metal, to bond the doubler plate to the nose gear plate. Has anyone else used epoxy? Sounds like a good idea to me. Opinions???? Rick #40956 Southampton, Ont On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Tim Olson wrote: > > Mine came off easily, thanks to the engine oil leaks I've had over > the past year. :) Thankfully no oil on the rubber elastomers > though. > > When I reassembled, I cleaned it all up and also greased inside > the cap, on the upper shaft, on the shim washers, and down to the > very top of the elastomers...hoping that maybe this would > at least help against further shaft wear. > > Tim > > On 9/16/2014 2:33 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > >> Probably a good idea to grease the inside of the collar before >> re-installing. I greased the washer/shim as well. Don't know that there >> is much movement or corrosion risk, but why not minimize risk. >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jesse Saint <jesse(at)saintaviation.com>
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
Date: Sep 16, 2014
Is he referring to something like JB Weld? As Tim O mentioned, that would ma ke it very hard to remove for inspection later down the road. I think, as ot hers have said, that simply something to keep it from bouncing around as the tension on the elastomers is reduced over time is sufficient. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. 352-427-0285 jesse(at)saintaviation.com Sent from my iPad > On Sep 16, 2014, at 9:09 PM, Rick Lark wrote: > > Hey all > Had a fellow in my assembly facility (garage) today who suggested using ep oxy that is specifically made for metal, to bond the doubler plate to the no se gear plate. Has anyone else used epoxy? > > Sounds like a good idea to me. > > Opinions???? > > Rick > #40956 > Southampton, Ont > >> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Tim Olson wrote: >> >> Mine came off easily, thanks to the engine oil leaks I've had over >> the past year. :) Thankfully no oil on the rubber elastomers >> though. >> >> When I reassembled, I cleaned it all up and also greased inside >> the cap, on the upper shaft, on the shim washers, and down to the >> very top of the elastomers...hoping that maybe this would >> at least help against further shaft wear. >> >> Tim >> >>> On 9/16/2014 2:33 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote: >>> Probably a good idea to grease the inside of the collar before >>> re-installing. I greased the washer/shim as well. Don't know that there >>> is much movement or corrosion risk, but why not minimize risk. >> >> ========================= >> -List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> ========================= >> FORUMS - >> _blank">http://forums.matronics.com >> ========================= >> b Site - >> -Matt Dralle, List Admin. >> target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> ========================= > > > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Rick Lark <larkrv10(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
Date: Sep 17, 2014
Hi yeah that is exactly what we talked about. I guess it appears we all wil l have to inspect this area on a regular basis, so maybe high temp RTV is be st. Thx Jesse. Rick Sent from my iPad > On Sep 16, 2014, at 10:20 PM, Jesse Saint wrote: > > Is he referring to something like JB Weld? As Tim O mentioned, that would m ake it very hard to remove for inspection later down the road. I think, as o thers have said, that simply something to keep it from bouncing around as th e tension on the elastomers is reduced over time is sufficient. > > Jesse Saint > Saint Aviation, Inc. > 352-427-0285 > jesse(at)saintaviation.com > > Sent from my iPad > >> On Sep 16, 2014, at 9:09 PM, Rick Lark wrote: >> >> Hey all >> Had a fellow in my assembly facility (garage) today who suggested using e poxy that is specifically made for metal, to bond the doubler plate to the n ose gear plate. Has anyone else used epoxy? >> >> Sounds like a good idea to me. >> >> Opinions???? >> >> Rick >> #40956 >> Southampton, Ont >> >>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Tim Olson wrote: >>> >>> Mine came off easily, thanks to the engine oil leaks I've had over >>> the past year. :) Thankfully no oil on the rubber elastomers >>> though. >>> >>> When I reassembled, I cleaned it all up and also greased inside >>> the cap, on the upper shaft, on the shim washers, and down to the >>> very top of the elastomers...hoping that maybe this would >>> at least help against further shaft wear. >>> >>> Tim >>> >>>> On 9/16/2014 2:33 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote: >>>> Probably a good idea to grease the inside of the collar before >>>> re-installing. I greased the washer/shim as well. Don't know that there >>>> is much movement or corrosion risk, but why not minimize risk. >>> >>> ======================== =========== >>> -List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >>> ======================== =========== >>> FORUMS - >>> _blank">http://forums.matronics.com >>> ======================== =========== >>> b Site - >>> -Matt Dralle, List Admin. >>> target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >>> ======================== =========== >> >> >> >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> //forums.matronics.com >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> > > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 17, 2014
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
I must be missing something. I don't see that there will be any need to remove the doubler in the future. If the doubler is undamaged and still in place, I don't see that there would be any need to inspect the original plate at all. I guess it depends whether you believe the cracks were caused by the shock disks hammering on the original plate, or the retainer hammering from the top side, or both. Obviously the key is to ensure the shock disks are always in compression, even with the nose wheel off the ground. Kelly On 9/17/2014 5:56 AM, Rick Lark wrote: > Hi yeah that is exactly what we talked about. I guess it appears we > all will have to inspect this area on a regular basis, so maybe high > temp RTV is best. Thx Jesse. > Rick > > Sent from my iPad > > On Sep 16, 2014, at 10:20 PM, Jesse Saint > wrote: > >> Is he referring to something like JB Weld? As Tim O mentioned, that >> would make it very hard to remove for inspection later down the road. >> I think, as others have said, that simply something to keep it from >> bouncing around as the tension on the elastomers is reduced over time >> is sufficient. >> >> Jesse Saint >> Saint Aviation, Inc. >> 352-427-0285 >> jesse(at)saintaviation.com >> >> Sent from my iPad >> ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
From: Gary <speckter(at)comcast.net>
Date: Sep 17, 2014
When the shock discs compress and then are released the top retaining hat hammers on the plate. The more the discs are compressed and the quicker the release the harder the hammering. Thus it is this builders opinion that the reinforce ing plate needs to be secured to the old plate. Thus I am using both pro seal and Cherrymax rivets to assure the strongest plate possible. > On Sep 17, 2014, at 10:11 AM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > > > I must be missing something. I don't see that there will be any need to remove the doubler in the future. If the doubler is undamaged and still in place, I don't see that there would be any need to inspect the original plate at all. I guess it depends whether you believe the cracks were caused by the shock disks hammering on the original plate, or the retainer hammering from the top side, or both. Obviously the key is to ensure the shock disks are always in compression, even with the nose wheel off the ground. > Kelly >> On 9/17/2014 5:56 AM, Rick Lark wrote: >> Hi yeah that is exactly what we talked about. I guess it appears we all will have to inspect this area on a regular basis, so maybe high temp RTV is best. Thx Jesse. >> Rick >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On Sep 16, 2014, at 10:20 PM, Jesse Saint > wrote: >>> >>> Is he referring to something like JB Weld? As Tim O mentioned, that would make it very hard to remove for inspection later down the road. I think, as others have said, that simply something to keep it from bouncing around as the tension on the elastomers is reduced over time is sufficient. >>> >>> Jesse Saint >>> Saint Aviation, Inc. >>> 352-427-0285 >>> jesse(at)saintaviation.com >>> >>> Sent from my iPad > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 17, 2014
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
I have a cracked plate and now have the engine off so I can view it easily. The way I interpret the cracking is that it is from the elastomers pressing/striking the plate. The plate is clearly deformed by the pressure/striking. The crack(s) seem to emanate from the hole in the middle. The material around the hole would be in tension as it deforms. My guess is that a knick or weak spot around that hole would be enough to allow the cracking to start. I'm not clear on how the retainer interacts with the plate... more inspection required. Bill "I never wanted to pull the engine until overhaul time" Watson On 9/17/2014 10:11 AM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > > I must be missing something. I don't see that there will be any need > to remove the doubler in the future. If the doubler is undamaged and > still in place, I don't see that there would be any need to inspect > the original plate at all. I guess it depends whether you believe the > cracks were caused by the shock disks hammering on the original plate, > or the retainer hammering from the top side, or both. Obviously the > key is to ensure the shock disks are always in compression, even with > the nose wheel off the ground. > Kelly > On 9/17/2014 5:56 AM, Rick Lark wrote: >> Hi yeah that is exactly what we talked about. I guess it appears we >> all will have to inspect this area on a regular basis, so maybe high >> temp RTV is best. Thx Jesse. >> Rick >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On Sep 16, 2014, at 10:20 PM, Jesse Saint > > wrote: >> >>> Is he referring to something like JB Weld? As Tim O mentioned, that >>> would make it very hard to remove for inspection later down the >>> road. I think, as others have said, that simply something to keep it >>> from bouncing around as the tension on the elastomers is reduced >>> over time is sufficient. >>> >>> Jesse Saint >>> Saint Aviation, Inc. >>> 352-427-0285 >>> jesse(at)saintaviation.com >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: SB nose wheel report
From: Terry Moushon <tmoushon(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 17, 2014
I completed the SB for the RV10 today and have a couple observations. Background: First, the plane is NOT flying... The engine was installed on 7-22-2014 and has had the engine weight on the nose wheel ever since. I installed only one U-1002 isolation washer and when I put on the WD-1015 collar assembly, it was about 1/2 bolt hole off (tight). With the right leverage, the bolt did go in as planned...but very tight. Today, when I took the pressure off the nose wheel....the bolt slid right out...in fact had about .030 gap....meaning my assembly with only ONE isolation washer was loose. I added the painted doubler and RTV and reassembled it to find it was again 1/2 bolt hole off (tight). After a little coaxing again, it fit just fine. So just the weight of the engine and a couple months compressed the elastomers enough to make it loose when the weight is removed. As I am at least 12 months from flying, I plan to check it one more time just before I take to the sky. Terry ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 17, 2014
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Engine removal for SB 14-08-29
So I have removed my engine and will remove the mount this evening. Questions for the list: - I'm planning on replacing the engine mount elastomers. At 500 hours, why not except for $$$. Thoughts? - I don't know about replacing the nose wheel elastomers. Afterall, they are already compressed and 'set'. Thoughts? Bill ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 17, 2014
From: Linn Walters <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Engine removal for SB 14-08-29
I would think this comes under the heading of 'if it ain't broke .... don't fix it'. They will continue to compress, but the rate slows down over time. They should last for 10 years or more. I'd keep adding spacers until you see cracks in the elastomer. Linn On 9/17/2014 4:06 PM, Bill Watson wrote: > > So I have removed my engine and will remove the mount this evening. > > Questions for the list: > - I'm planning on replacing the engine mount elastomers. At 500 > hours, why not except for $$$. Thoughts? > - I don't know about replacing the nose wheel elastomers. Afterall, > they are already compressed and 'set'. Thoughts? > > Bill > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: SB nose wheel report
From: Michael Kraus <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net>
Date: Sep 17, 2014
Interesting.... I've been flying for 180 hours on a grass strip and with one washer mine was still tight when I disassembled for the addition of the SB plate.... -Mike Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 17, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Terry Moushon wrote: > > > I completed the SB for the RV10 today and have a couple observations. > Background: First, the plane is NOT flying... The engine was installed on 7-22-2014 and has had the engine weight on the nose wheel ever since. I installed only one U-1002 isolation washer and when I put on the WD-1015 collar assembly, it was about 1/2 bolt hole off (tight). With the right leverage, the bolt did go in as planned...but very tight. > Today, when I took the pressure off the nose wheel....the bolt slid right out...in fact had about .030 gap....meaning my assembly with only ONE isolation washer was loose. I added the painted doubler and RTV and reassembled it to find it was again 1/2 bolt hole off (tight). After a little coaxing again, it fit just fine. So just the weight of the engine and a couple months compressed the elastomers enough to make it loose when the weight is removed. As I am at least 12 months from flying, I plan to check it one more time just before I take to the sky. > Terry > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 17, 2014
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: SB nose wheel report
While not flying yet, my engine has been mounted for about 18 months, and nose was still plenty tight with 1 washer, and required perhaps more than 100lbs up force on the tail to adequately compress nose to install the top hat...more than it took to originally assemble the nose gear. On 9/17/2014 5:40 PM, Michael Kraus wrote: > > Interesting.... I've been flying for 180 hours on a grass strip and with one washer mine was still tight when I disassembled for the addition of the SB plate.... > -Mike > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Sep 17, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Terry Moushon wrote: >> >> >> I completed the SB for the RV10 today and have a couple observations. >> Background: First, the plane is NOT flying... The engine was installed on 7-22-2014 and has had the engine weight on the nose wheel ever since. I installed only one U-1002 isolation washer and when I put on the WD-1015 collar assembly, it was about 1/2 bolt hole off (tight). With the right leverage, the bolt did go in as planned...but very tight. >> Today, when I took the pressure off the nose wheel....the bolt slid right out...in fact had about .030 gap....meaning my assembly with only ONE isolation washer was loose. I added the painted doubler and RTV and reassembled it to find it was again 1/2 bolt hole off (tight). After a little coaxing again, it fit just fine. So just the weight of the engine and a couple months compressed the elastomers enough to make it loose when the weight is removed. As I am at least 12 months from flying, I plan to check it one more time just before I take to the sky. >> Terry >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: SB nose wheel report
From: Carl Froehlich <carl.froehlich(at)verizon.net>
Date: Sep 17, 2014
Did the SB today. No cracks. One washer was not adequate - two required a little upward force on the tail. I had two washers in before the SB. Carl > On Sep 17, 2014, at 8:48 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > > > While not flying yet, my engine has been mounted for about 18 months, and nose was still plenty tight with 1 washer, and required perhaps more than 100lbs up force on the tail to adequately compress nose to install the top hat...more than it took to originally assemble the nose gear. >> On 9/17/2014 5:40 PM, Michael Kraus wrote: >> >> Interesting.... I've been flying for 180 hours on a grass strip and with one washer mine was still tight when I disassembled for the addition of the SB plate.... >> -Mike >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Sep 17, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Terry Moushon wrote: >>> >>> >>> I completed the SB for the RV10 today and have a couple observations. >>> Background: First, the plane is NOT flying... The engine was installed on 7-22-2014 and has had the engine weight on the nose wheel ever since. I installed only one U-1002 isolation washer and when I put on the WD-1015 collar assembly, it was about 1/2 bolt hole off (tight). With the right leverage, the bolt did go in as planned...but very tight. >>> Today, when I took the pressure off the nose wheel....the bolt slid right out...in fact had about .030 gap....meaning my assembly with only ONE isolation washer was loose. I added the painted doubler and RTV and reassembled it to find it was again 1/2 bolt hole off (tight). After a little coaxing again, it fit just fine. So just the weight of the engine and a couple months compressed the elastomers enough to make it loose when the weight is removed. As I am at least 12 months from flying, I plan to check it one more time just before I take to the sky. >>> Terry > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chris" <toaster73(at)embarqmail.com>
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
Date: Sep 17, 2014
How about this thought.... I would think if the doubler does its job, (it really is just serving as a giant) that the next problem which would be seen is a crack in the welds on the tubes. The doubler /washer is going to transfer the load out across the flat plate surface and now the welds could pick up more of the cyclic load that the insufficient thickness current plate was experiencing. The current plate most likely developed its cracks due to the cyclic bending in its center and outward thus preventing the welds from taking on the entire cyclic loads. It will be interesting to see, if in many many hours on from now for the rough field flyers, if they start to get cracks in the welds. This fix is just transferring the problem out to the welds and tubes, which of course if done right won't be a problem, because the load will be transferred better to the welds and the tubes - hopefully all of those items will have a much higher fatigue life which we will never see the end of. I would see no reason not to JB Weld it- if there is a problem in that area again it will be in the welds I suspect or tubes -not likely (hopefully). -Chris N919AR From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 10:21 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report Is he referring to something like JB Weld? As Tim O mentioned, that would make it very hard to remove for inspection later down the road. I think, as others have said, that simply something to keep it from bouncing around as the tension on the elastomers is reduced over time is sufficient. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. 352-427-0285 jesse(at)saintaviation.com Sent from my iPad On Sep 16, 2014, at 9:09 PM, Rick Lark wrote: Hey all Had a fellow in my assembly facility (garage) today who suggested using epoxy that is specifically made for metal, to bond the doubler plate to the nose gear plate. Has anyone else used epoxy? Sounds like a good idea to me. Opinions???? Rick #40956 Southampton, Ont On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Tim Olson wrote: Mine came off easily, thanks to the engine oil leaks I've had over the past year. :) Thankfully no oil on the rubber elastomers though. When I reassembled, I cleaned it all up and also greased inside the cap, on the upper shaft, on the shim washers, and down to the very top of the elastomers...hoping that maybe this would at least help against further shaft wear. Tim On 9/16/2014 2:33 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote: Probably a good idea to grease the inside of the collar before re-installing. I greased the washer/shim as well. Don't know that there is much movement or corrosion risk, but why not minimize risk. -List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List FORUMS - _blank">http://forums.matronics.com b Site - -Matt Dralle, List Admin. target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D List"">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D //forums.matronics.com D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D ot;">http://www.matronics.com/contribution D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chris Hukill" <cjhukill(at)cox.net>
Subject: the other nose gear issue
Date: Sep 18, 2014
I=99m not flying yet and have been holding off doing the SB until the last minute as I am still waiting to hear from Vans about the OTHER failure of the nose gear assembly. A couple of months ago, someone wrote in about the failure of the welds of the vertical post to the gear leg, down by the wheel. He wrote that upon a normal landing, the welds failed and the wheel flew back into the fuselage and wing causing major damage to the aircraft and engine. He inspected the welds and found improper penetration of the welds, and sent the parts to Vans for analysis . There has been no further comments on this issue from anyone on the list or Vans. If there is going to be a need to remove, bead blast and inspect/modify that portion of this Achilles heal, I only want to remove it once. Has anyone heard any follow up on this issue? here is the original post: From: ibspud(at)roadrunner.com Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rusty RV-8 Steel Parts and other problems Date: Wed=2C 23 Jul 2014 12:19:55 -0700 Danny Riggs wrote: I'll give you my tail of woe! Last Sunday I was making a routine landing at my home airport and on the ro llout the nose gear departed the plane and then the gear strut stuck into t he pavement and when the plane continued over it folded up underneath. It w as a main gear landing at a slow speed. Prop strike=2C very badly mangled f irewall where the nose gear strut cut into it=2C big gouge on left side whe re the nose wheel hit fusalage and then into the left flap. All at low spee d. Gas everywhere. I was fortunate that it didn't roll over when the strut dug into the pavement. The insurance adjustor come out today and looked it over. His opinion agreed with me as to cause of accident. The gear strut br oke at the weld where it attaches to the upright spindle on the wheel assem bly. Looks to be a very poor weld and not a very robust design to boot. The weld was very small in width and didn't penetrate very deep. Split right down the middle of the weld=2C I wonder how many ticking time bombs are out there ready to blow off the nose gears. Not in a place to check very often either. Dan> Date: Sun=2C 13 Jul 2014 11:28:20 -0700 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: the other nose gear issue
From: "bill.peyton" <peyton.b(at)sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sep 18, 2014
Was this an RV8 or 10? -------- Bill WA0SYV Aviation Partners, LLC Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430714#430714 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Danny Riggs <jdriggs49(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: the other nose gear issue
Date: Sep 18, 2014
UlYtMTAuICBIYXBwZW5lZCBhYm91dCBhIG1vbnRoIGFnby4gVmFuJ3MgaGFzIGJlZW4gdHJ5aW5n IHRvIGJsYW1lIG1lIGZvciBpdC4gT2YgY291cnNlISEg8J+YoPCfmKBFdmVyeWJvZHkgdGhhdCBs b29rcyBhdCBpdCBzYXlzIGl0cyBhIGxvdXN5IHdlbGQuIEF0IDM0IGhvdXJzIG9mIHVzZSBub3Ro aW5nIHNob3VsZCBiZSBicmVha2luZyBldmVuIGlmIGxhbmRlZCBoYXJkIGEgY291cGxlIG9mIHRp bWUuIChJdCB3YXNuJ3QpLiBUaGluayBvZiBhbGwgdGhlIENlc3NuYXMgdGhhdCBoYXZlIGJlZW4g bGFuZGVkIG9uIHRoZSBub3NlIGdlYXIgcmVwZWF0YWJseSBieSBzdHVkZW50cyB3aXRoIG5vIGJy ZWFrcy4gSSB3YXMgcmVhbGx5IHN1cnByaXNlZCB3aGVuIGl0IGhhcHBlbmVkIGFzIHRoZXJlIGhh ZCBiZWVuIG5vIHJlYXNvbiBmb3IgaXQgdG8gZmFpbC4gRGFuDQoNCj4gU3ViamVjdDogUlYxMC1M aXN0OiBSZTogdGhlIG90aGVyIG5vc2UgZ2VhciBpc3N1ZQ0KPiBGcm9tOiBwZXl0b24uYkBzYmNn bG9iYWwubmV0DQo+IERhdGU6IFRodSwgMTggU2VwIDIwMTQgMDY6MTE6MTEgLTA3MDANCj4gVG86 IHJ2MTAtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tDQo+IA0KPiAtLT4gUlYxMC1MaXN0IG1lc3NhZ2UgcG9z dGVkIGJ5OiAiYmlsbC5wZXl0b24iIDxwZXl0b24uYkBzYmNnbG9iYWwubmV0Pg0KPiANCj4gV2Fz IHRoaXMgYW4gUlY4IG9yIDEwPw0KPiANCj4gLS0tLS0tLS0NCj4gQmlsbCANCj4gV0EwU1lWDQo+ IEF2aWF0aW9uIFBhcnRuZXJzLCBMTEMNCj4gDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gDQo+IFJlYWQgdGhpcyB0b3Bp YyBvbmxpbmUgaGVyZToNCj4gDQo+IGh0dHA6Ly9mb3J1bXMubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS92aWV3dG9w aWMucGhwP3A9NDMwNzE0IzQzMDcxNA0KPiANCj4gDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gXy09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT0NCj4gXy09ICAgICAgICAgIC0gVGhlIFJWMTAtTGlzdCBFbWFpbCBGb3J1bSAtDQo+IF8tPSBV c2UgdGhlIE1hdHJvbmljcyBMaXN0IEZlYXR1cmVzIE5hdmlnYXRvciB0byBicm93c2UNCj4gXy09 IHRoZSBtYW55IExpc3QgdXRpbGl0aWVzIHN1Y2ggYXMgTGlzdCBVbi9TdWJzY3JpcHRpb24sDQo+ IF8tPSBBcmNoaXZlIFNlYXJjaCAmIERvd25sb2FkLCA3LURheSBCcm93c2UsIENoYXQsIEZBUSwN Cj4gXy09IFBob3Rvc2hhcmUsIGFuZCBtdWNoIG11Y2ggbW9yZToNCj4gXy09DQo+IF8tPSAgIC0t PiBodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vTmF2aWdhdG9yP1JWMTAtTGlzdA0KPiBfLT0NCj4g Xy09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT0NCj4gXy09ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgLSBNQVRST05JQ1MgV0VCIEZPUlVNUyAtDQo+IF8t PSBTYW1lIGdyZWF0IGNvbnRlbnQgYWxzbyBhdmFpbGFibGUgdmlhIHRoZSBXZWIgRm9ydW1zIQ0K PiBfLT0NCj4gXy09ICAgLS0+IGh0dHA6Ly9mb3J1bXMubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbQ0KPiBfLT0NCj4g Xy09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT0NCj4gXy09ICAgICAgICAgICAgIC0gTGlzdCBDb250cmlidXRpb24gV2ViIFNpdGUgLQ0K PiBfLT0gIFRoYW5rIHlvdSBmb3IgeW91ciBnZW5lcm91cyBzdXBwb3J0IQ0KPiBfLT0gICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAtTWF0dCBEcmFsbGUsIExpc3QgQWRtaW4uDQo+IF8tPSAg IC0tPiBodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vY29udHJpYnV0aW9uDQo+IF8tPT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09DQo+IA0K PiANCj4gDQogCQkgCSAgIAkJICA ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 18, 2014
Subject: Re: the other nose gear issue
From: Phillip Perry <philperry9(at)gmail.com>
Sorry to hear about that and I'm sorry I missed it earlier. That's a disaster. Did you snap any photos before sending it back to Van's for analysis? On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Danny Riggs wrote: > RV-10. Happened about a month ago. Van's has been trying to blame me for > it. Of course!! [image: Emoji][image: Emoji]Everybody that looks at it > says its a lousy weld. At 34 hours of use nothing should be breaking even > if landed hard a couple of time. (It wasn't). Think of all the Cessnas that > have been landed on the nose gear repeatably by students with no breaks. I > was really surprised when it happened as there had been no reason for it to > fail. Dan > > > Subject: RV10-List: Re: the other nose gear issue > > From: peyton.b(at)sbcglobal.net > > Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 06:11:11 -0700 > > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > > > > > > > Was this an RV8 or 10? > > > > -------- > > Bill > > WA0SYV > > Aviation Partners, LLC > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430714#430714 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Danny Riggs <jdriggs49(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: the other nose gear issue
Date: Sep 18, 2014
DQpZZWFoIEkgZGlkLg0KQWxzbyBoYWQgdGhyZWUgQSZQcyBhbmQgdHdvIHdlbGRpbmcgZXhwZXJ0 cyBsb29rIGF0IGl0LiBUaGV5IGFsbCBzYWlkIGl0IHdhcyBhIGJhZCB3ZWxkLiBEaXNhc3RlciB0 byB0aGUgdHVuZSBvZiAkOTBrLi7wn5iC8J+YgvCfmKBEYXRlOiBUaHUsIDE4IFNlcCAyMDE0IDA5 OjM4OjI5IC0wNTAwDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogUlYxMC1MaXN0OiBSZTogdGhlIG90aGVyIG5vc2Ug Z2VhciBpc3N1ZQ0KRnJvbTogcGhpbHBlcnJ5OUBnbWFpbC5jb20NClRvOiBydjEwLWxpc3RAbWF0 cm9uaWNzLmNvbQ0KDQpTb3JyeSB0byBoZWFyIGFib3V0IHRoYXQgYW5kIEknbSBzb3JyeSBJIG1p c3NlZCBpdCBlYXJsaWVyLiAgVGhhdCdzIGEgZGlzYXN0ZXIuDQpEaWQgeW91IHNuYXAgYW55IHBo b3RvcyBiZWZvcmUgc2VuZGluZyBpdCBiYWNrIHRvIFZhbidzIGZvciBhbmFseXNpcz8NCk9uIFRo dSwgU2VwIDE4LCAyMDE0IGF0IDk6MjYgQU0sIERhbm55IFJpZ2dzIDxqZHJpZ2dzNDlAbXNuLmNv bT4gd3JvdGU6DQoKCgpSVi0xMC4gIEhhcHBlbmVkIGFib3V0IGEgbW9udGggYWdvLiBWYW4ncyBo YXMgYmVlbiB0cnlpbmcgdG8gYmxhbWUgbWUgZm9yIGl0LiBPZiBjb3Vyc2UhISBFdmVyeWJvZHkg dGhhdCBsb29rcyBhdCBpdCBzYXlzIGl0cyBhIGxvdXN5IHdlbGQuIEF0IDM0IGhvdXJzIG9mIHVz ZSBub3RoaW5nIHNob3VsZCBiZSBicmVha2luZyBldmVuIGlmIGxhbmRlZCBoYXJkIGEgY291cGxl IG9mIHRpbWUuIChJdCB3YXNuJ3QpLiBUaGluayBvZiBhbGwgdGhlIENlc3NuYXMgdGhhdCBoYXZl IGJlZW4gbGFuZGVkIG9uIHRoZSBub3NlIGdlYXIgcmVwZWF0YWJseSBieSBzdHVkZW50cyB3aXRo IG5vIGJyZWFrcy4gSSB3YXMgcmVhbGx5IHN1cnByaXNlZCB3aGVuIGl0IGhhcHBlbmVkIGFzIHRo ZXJlIGhhZCBiZWVuIG5vIHJlYXNvbiBmb3IgaXQgdG8gZmFpbC4gRGFuDQoNCj4gU3ViamVjdDog UlYxMC1MaXN0OiBSZTogdGhlIG90aGVyIG5vc2UgZ2VhciBpc3N1ZQ0KPiBGcm9tOiBwZXl0b24u YkBzYmNnbG9iYWwubmV0DQo+IERhdGU6IFRodSwgMTggU2VwIDIwMTQgMDY6MTE6MTEgLTA3MDAN Cj4gVG86IHJ2MTAtbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tDQo+IA0KPiAtLT4gUlYxMC1MaXN0IG1lc3Nh Z2UgcG9zdGVkIGJ5OiAiYmlsbC5wZXl0b24iIDxwZXl0b24uYkBzYmNnbG9iYWwubmV0Pg0KPiAN Cj4gV2FzIHRoaXMgYW4gUlY4IG9yIDEwPw0KPiANCj4gLS0tLS0tLS0NCj4gQmlsbCANCj4gV0Ew U1lWDQo+IEF2aWF0aW9uIFBhcnRuZXJzLCBMTEMNCj4gDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gDQo+IFJlYWQgdGhp cyB0b3BpYyBvbmxpbmUgaGVyZToNCj4gDQo+IGh0dHA6Ly9mb3J1bXMubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS92 aWV3dG9waWMucGhwP3A9NDMwNzE0IzQzMDcxNA0KPiANCj4gDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gb3I/UlYxMC1M aXN0IiB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL05hdmlnYXRvcj9S VjEwLUxpc2Y9Imh0dHA6Ly9mb3J1bXMubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbSIgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiPmh0 dHA6Ly9mb3J1bXMubWF0cm9uaWNzbS9jb250cmlidXRpb24iIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj5odHRw Oi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vY29udHJpYnV0aW9uPT09PT09PT09PT09PT0NCj4gDQo+IA0K PiANCiAJCSAJICAgCQkgIAoNCgoKCgpfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQpfLT0gICAgICAgICAgLSBUaGUgUlYxMC1MaXN0 IEVtYWlsIEZvcnVtIC0KXy09IFVzZSB0aGUgTWF0cm9uaWNzIExpc3QgRmVhdHVyZXMgTmF2aWdh dG9yIHRvIGJyb3dzZQpfLT0gdGhlIG1hbnkgTGlzdCB1dGlsaXRpZXMgc3VjaCBhcyBMaXN0IFVu L1N1YnNjcmlwdGlvbiwKXy09IEFyY2hpdmUgU2VhcmNoICYgRG93bmxvYWQsIDctRGF5IEJyb3dz ZSwgQ2hhdCwgRkFRLApfLT0gUGhvdG9zaGFyZSwgYW5kIG11Y2ggbXVjaCBtb3JlOgpfLT0KXy09 ICAgLS0+IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9OYXZpZ2F0b3I/UlYxMC1MaXN0Cl8tPQpf LT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PQpfLT0gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAtIE1BVFJPTklDUyBXRUIgRk9SVU1TIC0KXy09IFNhbWUg Z3JlYXQgY29udGVudCBhbHNvIGF2YWlsYWJsZSB2aWEgdGhlIFdlYiBGb3J1bXMhCl8tPQpfLT0g ICAtLT4gaHR0cDovL2ZvcnVtcy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tCl8tPQpfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQpfLT0gICAgICAgICAg ICAgLSBMaXN0IENvbnRyaWJ1dGlvbiBXZWIgU2l0ZSAtCl8tPSAgVGhhbmsgeW91IGZvciB5b3Vy IGdlbmVyb3VzIHN1cHBvcnQhCl8tPSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIC1NYXR0 IERyYWxsZSwgTGlzdCBBZG1pbi4KXy09ICAgLS0+IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9j b250cmlidXRpb24KXy09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0KCiAJCSAJICAgCQkgIA= ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Pascal" <rv10flyer(at)live.com>
Subject: Re: the other nose gear issue
Date: Sep 18, 2014
After reading about Vic & Bill and his airport , I would think they would have suffered the same demise as you did by now. Really sorry about this happening to you Dan! Bill and or Vic; Please check that area of your gear for us and tell us what you see since it=99s all apart anyway, as this is very concerning. I really feel for you and the work needed to comply with the SB. From: Danny Riggs Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 9:35 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: the other nose gear issue Yeah I did. Also had three A&Ps and two welding experts look at it. They all said it was a bad weld. Disaster to the tune of $90k.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:38:29 -0500 Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: the other nose gear issue From: philperry9(at)gmail.com Sorry to hear about that and I'm sorry I missed it earlier. That's a disaster. Did you snap any photos before sending it back to Van's for analysis? On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Danny Riggs wrote: RV-10. Happened about a month ago. Van's has been trying to blame me for it. Of course!! Everybody that looks at it says its a lousy weld. At 34 hours of use nothing should be breaking even if landed hard a couple of time. (It wasn't). Think of all the Cessnas that have been landed on the nose gear repeatably by students with no breaks. I was really surprised when it happened as there had been no reason for it to fail. Dan > Subject: RV10-List: Re: the other nose gear issue > From: peyton.b(at)sbcglobal.net > Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 06:11:11 -0700 > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > > > Was this an RV8 or 10? > > -------- > Bill > WA0SYV > Aviation Partners, LLC > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430714#430714 > > > > > or?RV10-List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Lisf="http:// forums.matronics.com" target="_blank">http://forums.matronicsm/contribution" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution====== ======= > > > =EF=BD=EF=BD=EF=BD~=EF=BD=EF=BD,=EF=BD=03g(=EF=BD=EF =BD=EF=BDM=EF=BDGq=EF=BDz=EF=BD=EF=BD ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 18, 2014
From: Werner Schneider <glastar(at)gmx.net>
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
Thanks Bill, interesting, your crack pattern is totally different to the others, without disassembling you would not find it! And I wonder, it seems the compression under load did crack inside the dynafocal ring, so the plate will add some stiffness, but the load transfer to the ring would only be fully covered by welding another ring inside the dynafocal cup (like in the crack fix). So for "non cracked" the same repair might be the better approach.... Time will tell and this will as well request a total disassembly of the nose gear strut for inspection every then and now to detect your type of failure... Cheers Werner On 13.09.2014 19:54, Bill Watson wrote: > Nose Wheel Mount Status: Cracked at 3rd Condition Inspection. 4 donuts > installed since first flight. There was play in link assembly when > weight is removed from nosewheel > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chris Hukill" <cjhukill(at)cox.net>
Subject: other nose gear issue
Date: Sep 19, 2014
Is there anything that we as group can do to put pressure on Vans to determine if this was a faulty weld or design? Even if they won't admit fault, we could get someone to design a fix. I have already had an expert welder look at mine, without the paint removed. He says that the penetration SEEMS ok, however you can't really tell without further tests. He has come up with a reinforcing strap that would increase it's strength, and I may have it done when I remove the assembly for the SB. Danny, can I get copies of the photos that you took of the failed welds to see exactly where they broke? Thanks Chris Hukill ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 19, 2014
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
Yes it is quite true, disassembly is required. The SB correctly requires disassembly to determine whether there is cracking. Upon closer inspection I can see a number of hairline cracks radiating out from the hole. There are 3 main cracks at 90 degrees from each other and a number of smaller hairline cracks. There is significant deformation of the plate itself. I have a strong sense that the deformation causes expansion and therefore tension around the circumference of the hole which leads to the cracking. As I've said previously, I base out of a relatively rough field that contributed to a cracked front wheel found during last year's condition inspection. There is no doubt that the 'crack fix' is much more substantial than the 'doubler-only fix'. Is it worth the extra cost and effort if not cracks are found? I doubt it because while the cracks are inevitable if the plate is deformed, they will not occur at all if the plate remains relatively 'un-deformed' and flat. Adding the doubler should insure that the plates do not deform and therefore should not crack. So my thinking is: - if I had a flying aircraft with no cracks, adding the doubler will adequately ensure no deformation in the future. After all, there are many '10s flying many more hours than mine without any cracking (and presumably little or no deformation) using the current design. - If I had a non-flying plane with the engine installed, I'd add the doubler and fly. - If I have a non-flying plane with engine in the box, I'd be hard pressed not to exchange it for the new design, whatever that is. ...just my very uninformed and qualitative opinion Bill "both airport owners are welders so I've taken them thru my SB woes looking for welding help and NOT to foment guilt" Watson On 9/18/2014 5:31 PM, Werner Schneider wrote: > > Thanks Bill, > > interesting, your crack pattern is totally different to the others, > without disassembling you would not find it! > > And I wonder, it seems the compression under load did crack inside the > dynafocal ring, so the plate will add some stiffness, but the load > transfer to the ring would only be fully covered by welding another > ring inside the dynafocal cup (like in the crack fix). > > So for "non cracked" the same repair might be the better approach.... > > Time will tell and this will as well request a total disassembly of > the nose gear strut for inspection every then and now to detect your > type of failure... > > Cheers Werner > > On 13.09.2014 19:54, Bill Watson wrote: > >> Nose Wheel Mount Status: Cracked at 3rd Condition Inspection. 4 donuts >> installed since first flight. There was play in link assembly when >> weight is removed from nosewheel >> > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu>
Date: Sep 19, 2014
Bill points out an alternative means of compliance: buy a new, improved engine mount from Vans. Has anyone priced this out? I could not find it on Vans "list". -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430792#430792 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Danny Riggs <jdriggs49(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
Date: Sep 19, 2014
I have had to buy a new because of the extensive damage caused to the front end when the nose gear failed. $1100 and still waiting! > Subject: RV10-List: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report > From: bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu > Date: Fri=2C 19 Sep 2014 11:13:08 -0700 > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > > > Bill points out an alternative means of compliance: buy a new=2C improved engine mount from Vans. > Has anyone priced this out? I could not find it on Vans "list". > > -------- > Bob Turner > RV-10 QB > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430792#430792 > > > > > > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 19, 2014
From: Sean Stephens <sean(at)stephensville.com>
Subject: VA-144 Nose Gear Bushing
I had the nose lifted off the ground to start the recent service bulletin (no cracks) and noticed another issue. One of my VA-144 bushings, which is used where the nose gear leg attaches to the engine mount (plans page 46-5) has a lot of play in it. I can grab the nose gear leg and make it rock left to right and hear the play in the bushing in the engine mount. Only ~60 hours on the plane, so I'm sure it has been that way since the beginning, but just noticed it now. I recall someone else mentioning that issue and having a fix for it, but I can't locate the conversation in the search. Can't remember if they had a new bushing made. Anyone recall the person that posted about this a year or two ago? Thanks, -Sean #40303 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: VA-144 Nose Gear Bushing
From: Gary <speckter(at)comcast.net>
Date: Sep 20, 2014
That was Robin Marks. But I don't remember more about it. Gary SPECKETER > On Sep 19, 2014, at 7:38 PM, Sean Stephens wrote: > > > I had the nose lifted off the ground to start the recent service bulletin (no cracks) and noticed another issue. > > One of my VA-144 bushings, which is used where the nose gear leg attaches to the engine mount (plans page 46-5) has a lot of play in it. I can grab the nose gear leg and make it rock left to right and hear the play in the bushing in the engine mount. Only ~60 hours on the plane, so I'm sure it has been that way since the beginning, but just noticed it now. > > I recall someone else mentioning that issue and having a fix for it, but I can't locate the conversation in the search. Can't remember if they had a new bushing made. Anyone recall the person that posted about this a year or two ago? > > Thanks, > > -Sean #40303 > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chris" <toaster73(at)embarqmail.com>
Subject: VA-144 Nose Gear Bushing
Date: Sep 20, 2014
I had this problem last inspection. I only had about 70 hours too. I am not sure if they actually wore or not, they may have gone in tight only because of paint and then with paint wearing the problem shows up. I think the engine mount holes are too big from the start though. Anyway, the fix was the below parts from Van's. They have these oversized bushings ready, but not really listed online. Once I got these parts I borrowed some pin gauges from the machine shop to check my engine mount boss diameters precisely. I picked the gauge that fit in the boss with the best feel not too tight, but no play. Then I had the machine shop machine the oversized bushings outside diameter to that pin gauge size (+/-.002). It is nice and smooth action now with no wobble. The bolts were fine as were the bolt holes in the bushings, all the play was between the bushing and engine mount boss. I have not done bulletin yet. Good Luck Chris Lucas N919AR -----Original Message----- From: Sterling Langrell [mailto:sterling(at)vansaircraft.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 11:06 AM Subject: Re: RV-10 Nose gear leg? We do have an oversized bushing available but it will require you modify it to fit your mount. In most cases the problem has been between the bushing and the engine mount and not the bolt and the bushing. You will want to address this and eliminate the movement. Sterling BUSH-ST 313X780X1.563 R0 VA-144 OVSZ OVERSIZED BUSHING -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Sean Stephens Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 7:39 PM Subject: RV10-List: VA-144 Nose Gear Bushing I had the nose lifted off the ground to start the recent service bulletin (no cracks) and noticed another issue. One of my VA-144 bushings, which is used where the nose gear leg attaches to the engine mount (plans page 46-5) has a lot of play in it. I can grab the nose gear leg and make it rock left to right and hear the play in the bushing in the engine mount. Only ~60 hours on the plane, so I'm sure it has been that way since the beginning, but just noticed it now. I recall someone else mentioning that issue and having a fix for it, but I can't locate the conversation in the search. Can't remember if they had a new bushing made. Anyone recall the person that posted about this a year or two ago? Thanks, -Sean #40303 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
From: David Leikam <arplnplt(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 20, 2014
I have about 300 hours and found no cracks while completing the SB. #40496, first flight in March 2011, only landed on grass twice so far. However, after reading Garys post regarding the hammering affect of the cap on the top of the plate has anyone considered replacing the spacer washer with a soft washer to cushion the hammering? Dave Leikam On Sep 19, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Bill Watson wrote: > > Yes it is quite true, disassembly is required. The SB correctly requires disassembly to determine whether there is cracking. > > Upon closer inspection I can see a number of hairline cracks radiating out from the hole. There are 3 main cracks at 90 degrees from each other and a number of smaller hairline cracks. There is significant deformation of the plate itself. I have a strong sense that the deformation causes expansion and therefore tension around the circumference of the hole which leads to the cracking. As I've said previously, I base out of a relatively rough field that contributed to a cracked front wheel found during last year's condition inspection. > > There is no doubt that the 'crack fix' is much more substantial than the 'doubler-only fix'. Is it worth the extra cost and effort if not cracks are found? I doubt it because while the cracks are inevitable if the plate is deformed, they will not occur at all if the plate remains relatively 'un-deformed' and flat. Adding the doubler should insure that the plates do not deform and therefore should not crack. > > So my thinking is: > > - if I had a flying aircraft with no cracks, adding the doubler will adequately ensure no deformation in the future. After all, there are many '10s flying many more hours than mine without any cracking (and presumably little or no deformation) using the current design. > > - If I had a non-flying plane with the engine installed, I'd add the doubler and fly. > > - If I have a non-flying plane with engine in the box, I'd be hard pressed not to exchange it for the new design, whatever that is. > > ...just my very uninformed and qualitative opinion > > Bill "both airport owners are welders so I've taken them thru my SB woes looking for welding help and NOT to foment guilt" Watson > > On 9/18/2014 5:31 PM, Werner Schneider wrote: >> >> Thanks Bill, >> >> interesting, your crack pattern is totally different to the others, without disassembling you would not find it! >> >> And I wonder, it seems the compression under load did crack inside the dynafocal ring, so the plate will add some stiffness, but the load transfer to the ring would only be fully covered by welding another ring inside the dynafocal cup (like in the crack fix). >> >> So for "non cracked" the same repair might be the better approach.... >> >> Time will tell and this will as well request a total disassembly of the nose gear strut for inspection every then and now to detect your type of failure... >> >> Cheers Werner >> >> On 13.09.2014 19:54, Bill Watson wrote: >> >>> Nose Wheel Mount Status: Cracked at 3rd Condition Inspection. 4 donuts >>> installed since first flight. There was play in link assembly when >>> weight is removed from nosewheel >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> >> > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 20, 2014
From: Sean Stephens <sean(at)stephensville.com>
Subject: Re: VA-144 Nose Gear Bushing
Thanks for the info Chris. Will get a couple of these ordered. -Sean > Chris > September 20, 2014 at 8:44 AM > > I had this problem last inspection. I only had about 70 hours too. I > am not > sure if they actually wore or not, they may have gone in tight only > because > of paint and then with paint wearing the problem shows up. I think the > engine mount holes are too big from the start though. Anyway, the fix was > the below parts from Van's. They have these oversized bushings ready, but > not really listed online. Once I got these parts I borrowed some pin > gauges > from the machine shop to check my engine mount boss diameters precisely. I > picked the gauge that fit in the boss with the best feel not too > tight, but > no play. Then I had the machine shop machine the oversized bushings > outside > diameter to that pin gauge size (+/-.002). It is nice and smooth > action now > with no wobble. The bolts were fine as were the bolt holes in the > bushings, > all the play was between the bushing and engine mount boss. > I have not done bulletin yet. > Good Luck > Chris Lucas > N919AR > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sterling Langrell [mailto:sterling(at)vansaircraft.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 11:06 AM > To: Chris > Subject: Re: RV-10 Nose gear leg? > > We do have an oversized bushing available but it will require you > modify it > to fit your mount. > In most cases the problem has been between the bushing and the engine > mount > and not the bolt and the bushing. You will want to address this and > eliminate the movement. > > Sterling > > BUSH-ST 313X780X1.563 > R0 VA-144 OVSZ > OVERSIZED BUSHING > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Sean Stephens > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 7:39 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: VA-144 Nose Gear Bushing > > > I had the nose lifted off the ground to start the recent service bulletin > (no cracks) and noticed another issue. > > One of my VA-144 bushings, which is used where the nose gear leg > attaches to > the engine mount (plans page 46-5) has a lot of play in it. > I can grab the nose gear leg and make it rock left to right and hear the > play in the bushing in the engine mount. Only ~60 hours on the plane, so > I'm sure it has been that way since the beginning, but just noticed it > now. > > I recall someone else mentioning that issue and having a fix for it, but I > can't locate the conversation in the search. Can't remember if they had a > new bushing made. Anyone recall the person that posted about this a > year or > two ago? > > Thanks, > > -Sean #40303 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
From: "dmaib(at)me.com" <dmaib(at)me.com>
Date: Sep 20, 2014
arplnplt(at)gmail.com wrote: > I have about 300 hours and found no cracks while completing the SB. #40496, first flight in March 2011, only landed on grass twice so far. > However, after reading Garys post regarding the hammering affect of the cap on the top of the plate has anyone considered replacing the spacer washer with a soft washer to cushion the hammering? > > Dave Leikam > > > > Will there be a hammering effect if the preload is maintained on the rubber elastomers with the use of the U-1002 isolator washers? -------- David Maib RV-10 #40559 New Smyrna Beach, FL Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430828#430828 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 20, 2014
From: speckter(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
A rubber or similar cushion on the top side of the plate under the hat woul d not help much.=C2- The force of the hat heading downward from the compr ession of the elastomers=C2-is cancelled out by the remaining compression on=C2-elastomers.=C2- However what is not cancelled out is the mass of the gear,wheel, pant etc accelerating downward.=C2- That is what causes the hat to hammer the top of the plate which flexes slightly downward and t hen is flexed back upward by the next compression of the elastomers.=C2- A classic case of metal fatigue. The thicker plate if adhered properly by e ither welding or rivets will solve that issue.=C2- That is this builders analysis. =C2- Gary=C2- =C2- ----- Original Message ----- From: dmaib(at)me.com Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2014 11:51:56 AM Subject: RV10-List: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report arplnplt(at)gmail.com wrote: > I have about 300 hours and found no cracks while completing the SB. =C2 -#40496, first flight in March 2011, only landed on grass twice so far. > However, after reading Gary=C3=AF=C2=C2=BDs post regarding the hammeri ng affect of the cap on the top of the plate has anyone considered replacin g the spacer washer with a soft washer to cushion the hammering? > > Dave Leikam > > > =C2- > Will there be a hammering effect if the preload is =C2-maintained on the rubber elastomers with the use of the U-1002 isolator washers? -------- David Maib RV-10 #40559 New Smyrna Beach, FL Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430828#430828 =========== =========== MS - =========== e - =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2- =C2--Matt Dralle, List Admin. =========== ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu>
Date: Sep 20, 2014
Gary is correct; on the down stroke the impulse load delivered from the top hat/washer to the plate is due to the momentum of the nose gear assembly, which has been accelerated downward due to the compressed donuts. This is an interesting engineering problem which is very complicated. I've just started to think about it, but my thoughts are as follows. In the real world, everything bends (a little). If you hit a bump, the tire flexes, the nose gear flexes, and if the force applied to the donuts exceeds their static loading (weight on them, plus preload), they compress and the top hat goes up. Now if the back side of the bump ends abruptly, the donuts and the slightly flexed nose gear, plus gravity (pretty negligible here) accelerate the tire downwards. But in the meantime the tire is somewhat unloaded, and expands to a more-round shape (especially since it's rotating). If the ground is the same height as before the bump, the tire hits slightly before the hat; the tire compresses and then the hat hits. So there is some shock absorption. OTOH if the bump is followed by a "hole", the wheel is driven downward until the top hat hits. All this depends on the time constants involved (how fast, how wide is the bump, etc.). With no calculation at all, my gut feeling is that if the hat was hitting hard enough to damage the plate, we would also be seeing damage to the AN5 bolt that ties it to the donut shaft. (They both see the same load). I do not see the value of gluing the new plate to the old plate, as far as the downward load imposed by the hat is concerned. In all cases that new plate is being held up against the mount by hundreds, I think, of pounds of force, from the compressed donuts; more than RTV could ever hold. The glue may be useful for keeping the plate from creeping against the other parts of the mount over time. But frankly I don't see that happening, unless you grease both sides of the new plate. I need to think about this some more. -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430838#430838 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
From: Gary <speckter(at)comcast.net>
Date: Sep 20, 2014
This is a great expansion of my thoughts. Thus my recommendation of riveting or welding the new plate. The bolt on the hat is in shear and thus not susceptible to the flexion that affects the plate. It is the flexion that causes the thin plate to flex and thus to fail. Gary > On Sep 20, 2014, at 6:00 PM, "Bob Turner" wrote: > > > Gary is correct; on the down stroke the impulse load delivered from the top hat/washer to the plate is due to the momentum of the nose gear assembly, which has been accelerated downward due to the compressed donuts. > > This is an interesting engineering problem which is very complicated. I've just started to think about it, but my thoughts are as follows. In the real world, everything bends (a little). If you hit a bump, the tire flexes, the nose gear flexes, and if the force applied to the donuts exceeds their static loading (weight on them, plus preload), they compress and the top hat goes up. Now if the back side of the bump ends abruptly, the donuts and the slightly flexed nose gear, plus gravity (pretty negligible here) accelerate the tire downwards. But in the meantime the tire is somewhat unloaded, and expands to a more-round shape (especially since it's rotating). If the ground is the same height as before the bump, the tire hits slightly before the hat; the tire compresses and then the hat hits. So there is some shock absorption. OTOH if the bump is followed by a "hole", the wheel is driven downward until the top hat hits. All this depends on the time constants involved (how fast,! > how wide is the bump, etc.). > With no calculation at all, my gut feeling is that if the hat was hitting hard enough to damage the plate, we would also be seeing damage to the AN5 bolt that ties it to the donut shaft. (They both see the same load). > > I do not see the value of gluing the new plate to the old plate, as far as the downward load imposed by the hat is concerned. In all cases that new plate is being held up against the mount by hundreds, I think, of pounds of force, from the compressed donuts; more than RTV could ever hold. The glue may be useful for keeping the plate from creeping against the other parts of the mount over time. But frankly I don't see that happening, unless you grease both sides of the new plate. > > I need to think about this some more. > > -------- > Bob Turner > RV-10 QB > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430838#430838 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Phillip Perry <philperry9(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: SB Nose Wheel Report
Date: Sep 20, 2014
Could it be fastened with screws and made more resilient than rivets? Haven't done the modification yet and I don't have the parts in my hand to know if it's possible.... Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 20, 2014, at 6:13 PM, Gary wrote: > > > This is a great expansion of my thoughts. Thus my recommendation of riveting or welding the new plate. > The bolt on the hat is in shear and thus not susceptible to the flexion that affects the plate. It is the flexion that causes the thin plate to flex and thus to fail. > > Gary > >> On Sep 20, 2014, at 6:00 PM, "Bob Turner" wrote: >> >> >> Gary is correct; on the down stroke the impulse load delivered from the top hat/washer to the plate is due to the momentum of the nose gear assembly, which has been accelerated downward due to the compressed donuts. >> >> This is an interesting engineering problem which is very complicated. I've just started to think about it, but my thoughts are as follows. In the real world, everything bends (a little). If you hit a bump, the tire flexes, the nose gear flexes, and if the force applied to the donuts exceeds their static loading (weight on them, plus preload), they compress and the top hat goes up. Now if the back side of the bump ends abruptly, the donuts and the slightly flexed nose gear, plus gravity (pretty negligible here) accelerate the tire downwards. But in the meantime the tire is somewhat unloaded, and expands to a more-round shape (especially since it's rotating). If the ground is the same height as before the bump, the tire hits slightly before the hat; the tire compresses and then the hat hits. So there is some shock absorption. OTOH if the bump is followed by a "hole", the wheel is driven downward until the top hat hits. All this depends on the time constants involved (how fas! > t,! >> how wide is the bump, etc.). >> With no calculation at all, my gut feeling is that if the hat was hitting hard enough to damage the plate, we would also be seeing damage to the AN5 bolt that ties it to the donut shaft. (They both see the same load). >> >> I do not see the value of gluing the new plate to the old plate, as far as the downward load imposed by the hat is concerned. In all cases that new plate is being held up against the mount by hundreds, I think, of pounds of force, from the compressed donuts; more than RTV could ever hold. The glue may be useful for keeping the plate from creeping against the other parts of the mount over time. But frankly I don't see that happening, unless you grease both sides of the new plate. >> >> I need to think about this some more. >> >> -------- >> Bob Turner >> RV-10 QB >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=430838#430838 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >


August 30, 2014 - September 21, 2014

RV10-Archive.digest.vol-kd