Fw: Hartzell Composite three blade test against Van's N410RV


Subject:    Fw: Hartzell Composite three blade test against Van's N410RV
From:    pascal (pascal@rv10builder.net)
Date:    Wed Aug 27 - 7:10 PM
A few years ago there was the Vic Vans and Randy vans comparo..around 
the same altitude.
 I attached the sheet
Pascal


From: John Cumins 
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 3:17 PM
To: rv10-list@matronics.com 
Subject: RE: Hartzell Composite three blade test against 
Van's N410RV


Who out there in RV-10 land is running the MT 3 blade prop.  Can you 
post your average True airspeed at say 7500 or 8500 and what power 
setting are you using.  


This would be a nice data point to compare also.


John G. Cumins

#40864  Vstab done working on rudder


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------

From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com 
[mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Patrick 
Thyssen
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 2:34 PM
To: rv10-list@matronics.com
Subject: Re: Hartzell Composite three blade test against 
Van's N410RV


       Maybe van needs to balance the prop?

      Pat Thyssen

      --- On Wed, 8/27/08, RobHickman@aol.com <RobHickman@aol.com> 
wrote:

        From: RobHickman@aol.com <RobHickman@aol.com>
        Subject: Hartzell Composite three blade test against 
Van's N410RV
        To: rv10-list@matronics.com
        Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 1:23 PM

        Ken Krueger, from Van's, and I tested our RV-10 with the 
three-blade composite prop against Van's RV-10 N410RV with the metal 
two-blade prop.

         

        We flew both airplanes at 8,000' density altitude, 2500RPM, full 
throttle, 50F ROP for a total of about 75 miles out and back.   Our best 
estimate is that the three-blade prop is 7 kts slower than the blended 
airfoil metal prop.

       

      Ideally, we should test the two-blade blended airfoil prop on our 
RV-10 and use that as the comparison. This would eliminate the variables 
involved when using two separate planes. Keep in mind that our RV-10 is 
still unpainted and needs some cleanup on the fairings.

       

      After we both landed, Ken flew our RV-10 and was very impressed 
with how smooth the prop was. Ken's direct quote was, "it is 
dramatically smoother than N410RV, and it makes no difference if you run 
2300,  2400 or 2500 RPM, it is always extremely smooth".

       

      Even if it turns out to truly be 7 kts slower, there=A2s no way I 
would give up the smoothness for a little more speed.

       

       

      Rob Hickman

      N402RH  RV-10


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-

      It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel 
deal here.

  get=_blank 
rel=nofollow>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List=nofollow>ht
tp://forums.matronics.comblank 
rel=nofollow>http://www.matronics.com/contribution  

  http://www.matronics.com/contribution 




Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   RV10-List@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browsing
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Browse the List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --