AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Sun 08/24/03


Total Messages Posted: 16



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:35 AM - Re: RG-180 Coax? (Denny)
     2. 05:45 AM - RG180 coax? (Fergus Kyle)
     3. 07:35 AM - GPS Antenna Ground Plane (BAKEROCB@aol.com)
     4. 09:27 AM - Use of mobile TV LCD monitor? (Dr. Andrew Elliott)
     5. 09:37 AM - Re: Re: RV-List: GPS Antenna (Larry Bowen)
     6. 10:14 AM - Re: Re: RV-List: GPS Antenna (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     7. 10:41 AM - Re: Re: RV-List: GPS Antenna (Larry Bowen)
     8. 11:48 AM - Re: RG-180 Coax? (richard@riley.net)
     9. 02:04 PM - Transient suppression (Frederic Livesey)
    10. 02:21 PM - threaded BNC on GPS antenna? (Dan Checkoway)
    11. 02:58 PM - Re: threaded BNC on GPS antenna? (Jim Daniels)
    12. 03:35 PM - Re: threaded BNC on GPS antenna? (Dan Checkoway)
    13. 04:03 PM - Re: Re: RG-180 Coax? (LarryRobertHelming)
    14. 07:17 PM - RG180 coax? (richard@riley.net)
    15. 08:36 PM - BNC Connector (PeterHunt1@aol.com)
    16. 09:01 PM - Re: Transient suppression (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:35:34 AM PST US
    From: "Denny" <dennymortensen@cableone.net>
    Subject: RG-180 Coax?
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Denny" <dennymortensen@cableone.net> I may be wrong on this but the only reference I can find to RG-180 shows it as 95 ohms impedance. I think you will find that RG-400 is 52 ohms, the same as RG-58. If I am correct I believe you have just purchased a nice cloths line as it will not be good for use in your airplane. Also attenuation is the same as loss IE the bigger the number the worse it is. An example of this is 3db is the same as half the power. 10 watts in to the coax at the radio would mean 5 watts showing up at the antenna 6 db loss would mean 2.5 at the antenna. It has been a few years since electronics class so I am a bit rusty but I think you will have to find another batch of coax. Sorry for the bad news but just tell the miss what a great deal you just got on a new cloths line. Denny dennymortensen@cableone.net Cozy #1145 Just Starting -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of richard@riley.net Subject: AeroElectric-List: RG-180 Coax? --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: richard@riley.net I've just bought a large reel of RG-180 coax surplus. It's either the biggest bargain I've ever found, or it's money down the drain.


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:45:06 AM PST US
    From: "Fergus Kyle" <VE3LVO@rac.ca>
    Subject: RG180 coax?
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Fergus Kyle" <VE3LVO@rac.ca> --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: richard@riley.net I've just bought a large reel of RG-180 coax surplus. It's either the biggest bargain I've ever found, or it's money down the drain. Compared to RG-400, it's smaller, lighter, bends tighter and has more attenuation - at 1 ghz and 100', it's 19.2 DB lost, vrs 14.1 for RG 400. The center core is 7 strands instead of 19. The rest of the specs are: M17/95-RG180 Center Conductor.0120"(7/.004")SCCS Dielectric .102" PTFE Shield SPC Jacket FEP Diameter .141 Minimum Recommended Bend Radius 0.7 Temp. ( C) -55 +200 Weight (lbs./MFT) 19.8 M17/128-RG400 Center Conductor .0384"(19/.008")SC Dielectric .116" PTFE Shield SPC (2) Jacket FEP Diameter .195 Minimum Recommended Bend Radius 1.0 Temp. ( C) -55 +200 Weight (lbs./MFT) 50.0 Have I just bought myself a pile o'trouble, trying to find a crimp center connector that will fit the smaller center conductor? Richard, You may have a winner there, but have left off the most important quality - the impedance. The ohmage built into the coaxial cable by the dimensions chosen by the maker are what dictate its ability to transfer the signal seamlessly to the antenna. This value is nominally 50ohms - just the way early coax was built, so is a usual standard and most units and antennas are designed for 50. There are however many others - 70 for TV and entertainment, 90 for other uses, etc. While you CAN transfer impedance from one value to another electronically, it adds complexity, weight and cost to the project. I don't know what FEP is for a jacket, but doubtless Bob will. The only other necessary dimension is what connectors will fit the coax and match other units. Basically, most of us (unlike hams) use only 20 or 30 feet of coax to connect to antennas, so saving a lot of money is not possible by collaring industry or forces surplus. It's easier, not much more expensive and almost as efficient to go with the flow (RG400 or 58). The hams play around with impedance transfer because they are likely using 100ft or so and they're pikers when it comes to laying out industry dollars. Saving $100 is important, saving $2 on an aircraft can be a disaster. The stewradesses used to ask. "When can you tell a captain is cheap?". The answer is "when another one notices it". Ferg


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:35:23 AM PST US
    From: BAKEROCB@aol.com
    Subject: GPS Antenna Ground Plane
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: BAKEROCB@aol.com 8/24/2003 Hello Fellow Builders, The instructions that I received with the antenna that came with my Garmin GNS 430 said that a 15 inch diameter metal ground plane should be installed under the antenna. This did not make much sense to me so I called Garmin. The tech told me that the large ground plane was not required. When I told hiim where the antenna was going to be installed -- aft of the firewall inside the fiberglass skin area between the firewall and the windshield he made a suggestion. He suggested that some sort of metal sheilding be installed under the antenna. His reasoning was that there was a lot of electromagnetic garbage that existed in that area from various engine and avionic sources and a metal shield under the antenna would help diminish any adverse effects on the antenna's performance from those sources. I have mounted my GPS antenna on a small aluminum shelf suspended from the underside of the fiberglass skin between the firewall and the windshield. 'OC' Baker, Builder of KIS TR-1 #116 4/14/97 - ?/?/?


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:27:34 AM PST US
    From: "Dr. Andrew Elliott" <a.s.elliott@cox.net>
    Subject: Use of mobile TV LCD monitor?
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Dr. Andrew Elliott" <a.s.elliott@cox.net> Has anyone out there tried using one of the small monitors available for portable DVD players as the display for cockpit information, either GPS or instruments? The small screens, about 3x5", are less than $150. I know resolution isn't that high, but a PDA is only 240x320. Andy Elliott N48DE/AA-1(TD,160)/KFFZ "World's Fastest (Grumman) American" http://members.cox.net/n48de/forsale/


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:37:10 AM PST US
    From: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@BowenAero.com>
    Subject: RE: RV-List: GPS Antenna
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@BowenAero.com> Yes, a standard BNC will fit. Good news. What about this smaller wire? Its "RG174A/U MIL-C-17F". Will the same tools I use for the BNC/RG400 work with this smaller wire? Thx, - Larry Bowen Larry@BowenAero.com http://BowenAero.com 2003 - The year of flight! > -----Original Message----- > > --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" > --> <bob.nuckolls@cox.net> > > At 02:37 PM 8/23/2003 -0400, you wrote: > >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Larry Bowen" > >--> <Larry@BowenAero.com> > > > >Related, but different - > > > >I was planning on using the stock ant that came with the Garmin 196 > >(any reason why I shouldn't?), and mounting it on the glare shield. > >Only problem is the plug at the end is rather large, maybe 1/2" in > >diameter. So I'll have to drill a big hole in the glare > shield to pass > >it through. Any way to avoid this? Disassemble? Splice? Something > >else? > > Is the connector something nice like a BNC connector > like this . . . > http://www.aeroelectric.com/articles/RG58/RG58_Not5.jpg or something else? If it's a BNC or other popular connector, you could just cut it off and replace it. Bob . . .


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:14:28 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <bob.nuckolls@cox.net>
    Subject: RE: RV-List: GPS Antenna
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <bob.nuckolls@cox.net> At 12:37 PM 8/24/2003 -0400, you wrote: >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@BowenAero.com> > >Yes, a standard BNC will fit. Good news. > >What about this smaller wire? Its "RG174A/U MIL-C-17F". Will the same >tools I use for the BNC/RG400 work with this smaller wire? No, not if you put your connector on "the right way" . . . but try putting an RG-58/RG-400 connector on using technique described in http://www.aeroelectric.com/articles/RG58/RG58.html and I think it will be just fine. Bob . . .


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:41:12 AM PST US
    From: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@BowenAero.com>
    Subject: RE: RV-List: GPS Antenna
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@BowenAero.com> OK. So I'll use the existing RG174A/U MIL-C-17F, lop off the end, feed it through the small hole in the glare screen, attached a BNC using the technique outlined in the artcle below. Thanks, - Larry Bowen Larry@BowenAero.com http://BowenAero.com 2003 - The year of flight! > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert L. Nuckolls, III [mailto:bob.nuckolls@cox.net] > Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 1:14 PM > To: aeroelectric-list@matronics.com > Subject: RE: AeroElectric-List: RE: RV-List: GPS Antenna > > > --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" > --> <bob.nuckolls@cox.net> > > At 12:37 PM 8/24/2003 -0400, you wrote: > >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Larry Bowen" > >--> <Larry@BowenAero.com> > > > >Yes, a standard BNC will fit. Good news. > > > >What about this smaller wire? Its "RG174A/U MIL-C-17F". > Will the same > >tools I use for the BNC/RG400 work with this smaller wire? > > No, not if you put your connector on "the right way" . . . > but try putting an RG-58/RG-400 connector on using technique > described in http://www.aeroelectric.com/articles/RG58/RG58.html > and I think it will be just fine. > > Bob . . .


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:48:04 AM PST US
    From: richard@riley.net
    Subject: RE: RG-180 Coax?
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: richard@riley.net Fergus, you're right on the impedence mismatch. It's 90, vrs 50 for RG400. It was only $50, so no great loss.


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:04:01 PM PST US
    From: Frederic Livesey <fred.livesey@zetnet.co.uk>
    Subject: Transient suppression
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Frederic Livesey <fred.livesey@zetnet.co.uk> Hi, having just purchased a evaluation board for the Motorola Oncore 12+ GPS unit ( hoping to make Moving Map System) I find in the instructions the following:- The low cost Evaluation Board is NOT DESIGNED to be plugged directly into an automotive electrical system for power. Automotive systems are extremely noisy(spikes,transients, etc)and the evaluation board is not fitted with the requisite transient suppression circuitry. It will most likely work for a while, but operation under these conditions is not recommended. When running the board on a 12volt power supply the 5 volt regulator gets rather warm so I intend to make a separate power supply using the LM 317 regulator (adjustable) anyone have any ideas how to include the transient suppression circuitry or is this another of those magic tales Bob Regards Fred Chester UK


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:21:43 PM PST US
    From: "Dan Checkoway" <dan@rvproject.com>
    Subject: threaded BNC on GPS antenna?
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Dan Checkoway" <dan@rvproject.com> Whoa...I just started messing around with crimping BNC connectors for my antenna wires. Working great. But then I took a closer look at my GPS antenna, an "AeroAntenna Technology, Inc." AT575 antenna (http://www.aeroantenna.com/html/aviation.html) that came with my GX60. Lo and behold it sports a *threaded* TNCF connector. What the...? Is this typical among GPS antennas? Can anybody recommend a P/N for crimp-on connector for RG-400? Thanks in advance, )_( Dan RV-7 N714D http://www.rvproject.com


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:58:14 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: threaded BNC on GPS antenna?
    From: Jim Daniels <jwdanie@comcast.net>
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Jim Daniels <jwdanie@comcast.net> > Is this typical among GPS antennas? Can anybody recommend a P/N for > crimp-on connector for RG-400? Dan, look carefully in your GX60 stuff. My GX65 included an Amphenol 79875 connector. The Amphenol documentation lists two RG400 TNC connectors, the 79875 (clamp) and the 31-4452 (crimp) per this document: http://www.amphenolrf.com/products/CatalogPages/tnc_catalog.pdf Digi-Key: 79875 $17.35 yikes! Mouser: 79875 $9.23 31-4452 $8.75 Jim


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:35:03 PM PST US
    From: "Dan Checkoway" <dan@rvproject.com>
    Subject: Re: threaded BNC on GPS antenna?
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Dan Checkoway" <dan@rvproject.com> Nevermind (sort of)...looks like the AMP 31-2373 (Mouser 523-31-2373, at $5.71 it's $2 cheaper than Digikey) will do the trick. Please let me know if there's any reason I shouldn't go ahead and order this... Thanks, )_( Dan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Checkoway" <dan@rvproject.com> Subject: AeroElectric-List: threaded BNC on GPS antenna? > --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Dan Checkoway" <dan@rvproject.com> > > Whoa...I just started messing around with crimping BNC connectors for my > antenna wires. Working great. > > But then I took a closer look at my GPS antenna, an "AeroAntenna Technology, > Inc." AT575 antenna (http://www.aeroantenna.com/html/aviation.html) that > came with my GX60. Lo and behold it sports a *threaded* TNCF connector. > What the...? > > Is this typical among GPS antennas? Can anybody recommend a P/N for > crimp-on connector for RG-400? > > Thanks in advance, > )_( Dan > RV-7 N714D > http://www.rvproject.com > >


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:03:01 PM PST US
    From: "LarryRobertHelming" <lhelming@sigecom.net>
    Subject: Re: RE: RG-180 Coax?
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "LarryRobertHelming" <lhelming@sigecom.net> I know what you mean. I remember before getting on the slicky slope when $50 was real money. do not archive Indiana Larry, RV7 Tip-up TMX-O-360 ACS2002 Dynon CNS430 Digitrak Bought some stainless steel towel racks today for just $21. ----- Original Message ----- From: <richard@riley.net> Subject: AeroElectric-List: RE: RG-180 Coax? > --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: richard@riley.net > > Fergus, you're right on the impedence mismatch. It's > 90, vrs 50 for RG400. It was only $50, so no great > loss. > >


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:17:08 PM PST US
    From: richard@riley.net
    Subject: RG180 coax?
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: richard@riley.net Fergus, you're right, it's a different impedance, 90 vrs 50 for RG400. Ah, well, it was only $35.


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:36:32 PM PST US
    From: PeterHunt1@aol.com
    Subject: BNC Connector
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: PeterHunt1@aol.com Larry, If you are installing a Garmin 430 I suggest getting top of the line antenna lead-in and connectors. I just installed the antenna on my Garmin GNS 530. I purchased Coaxial cable (part number RG-142 Coax) and Amphenol RFX BNC connectors (part number 31-2-RFX) from Gulf Coast Avionics. 800-474-9714 or www.gulf-coast-avionics.com. This BNC connector is a male connector which fits the Garmin as well as Van's antennas. The feature which I like is that it requires no crimping (no need for a questionable crimping tool). A tiny male tip gets soldered to the internal wire. Then you just assemble the parts and screw the connector together. If the instructions on the Amphenol package are not clear, just let me know. The antenna cable I am suggesting is a little costly at $4.00 a foot. I just don't think it is wise to install an expensive Garmin 430 and then try to save $10 on cheap antenna lead-in and connectors. IMHO. Pete RV-6, panel N216PH reserved


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:01:43 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <bob.nuckolls@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: Transient suppression
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <bob.nuckolls@cox.net> At 10:02 PM 8/24/2003 +0100, you wrote: >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Frederic Livesey ><fred.livesey@zetnet.co.uk> > >Hi, having just purchased a evaluation board for the Motorola Oncore 12+ >GPS unit ( hoping to make Moving Map System) I find in the instructions >the following:- The low cost Evaluation Board is NOT DESIGNED to be >plugged directly into an automotive electrical system for power. >Automotive systems are extremely noisy(spikes,transients, etc)and the >evaluation board is not fitted with the requisite transient suppression >circuitry. It will most likely work for a while, but operation under >these conditions is not recommended. > When running the board on a 12volt power supply the 5 volt regulator >gets rather warm so I intend to make a separate power supply using the >LM 317 regulator (adjustable) anyone have any ideas how to include the >transient suppression circuitry or is this another of those magic tales >Bob >Regards >Fred >Chester >UK Take a peek at http://216.55.140.222/temp/Power_Cond.gif This circuit was shared with another reader wanting to put a good firewall between his 5v powered microcontrollers and the little dragons that live on the 28v bus of his airplane . . . in particular, he wanted an input power conditioning circuit that would pass DO-160. In his case, he also wanted backup battery support that would disconnect automatically if bus power was available. In a nutshell, here's how the parts work. The LM7805 fixed regulator (and even LM317 in the high voltage versions) wouldn't stand off 80v surge. In your case, you're looking for 40v parts which IS possible at the integrated circuit level. None the less, for small current draws (less than a couple hundred mils) I usually include a zener/capacitor paralleled across the input to the 3-terminal regulator and a healthy source-limiting resistor upstream. The notion is that none of the expected short transients will push past the capacitor, none of the long ones will push past the zener. The 3-terminal regulator can be depended on for voltage regulation and noise reduction (what it does best) without having to stand off full DO-160 stress levels. I'm pretty sure this philosophy will work well for your application too. Bob . . .




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --