AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Wed 09/17/03


Total Messages Posted: 11



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:16 AM - Re: Battery on Engine side of firewall (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     2. 06:01 AM - Signs of alt starting to fail (Scott Bilinski)
     3. 06:11 AM - Re: AVG / Grisoft antivirus (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     4. 06:19 AM - Re: AVG / Grisoft antivirus (George Bass)
     5. 07:39 AM - AOA Indicator (Eric M. Jones)
     6. 09:11 AM - Battery Ground ()
     7. 09:40 AM - Re: Failure analysis to plagiarize?  (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     8. 10:16 AM - LED position lights (Bob Kuc)
     9. 12:00 PM - Re: Battery Ground (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    10. 07:19 PM - Re: Signs of alt starting to fail (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    11. 08:05 PM - Fw: RV-List: Ground block location (David Carter)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:16:40 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <bob.nuckolls@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: Battery on Engine side of firewall
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <bob.nuckolls@cox.net> At 09:06 PM 9/16/2003 -0500, you wrote: >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Ralph E. Capen" ><recapen@earthlink.net> > >Fellow listers, > >The RV 7 and 9 crowds (with new recomendations to the 6 guys) are putting >their batteries (Odyssey)forward of the firewall according to the firewall >forward info I'm now getting from Vans with the firewall forward kit. > >Are there compelling reasons NOT to do this? > >I can think of heat....! Maybe those batteries are immune!? > >I'm not too far past this point - is it time to go back and make this so? > >Thanks, >Ralph Capen >Already put my grounding block where this new battery box is supposed to >go...... What reasons were given for the latest recommendations? Batteries have lived happily under the cowl, under seats, and back behind seats on hundreds of thousands of airplanes for over 60 years. There's no compelling environmental reason for selecting one over the other. Most batteries are positioned to satisfy space and/or weight and balance considerations. If you're happy with where your battery is now, I wouldn't change it. Bob . . . -------------------------------------------- ( Knowing about a thing is different than ) ( understanding it. One can know a lot ) ( and still understand nothing. ) ( C.F. Kettering ) --------------------------------------------


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:01:34 AM PST US
    From: Scott Bilinski <bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com>
    Subject: Signs of alt starting to fail
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Scott Bilinski <bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com> Is there any way to tell if your alternator is on its last leg? What are the signs? Scott Bilinski Eng dept 305 Phone (858) 657-2536 Pager (858) 502-5190


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:11:47 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <bob.nuckolls@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: AVG / Grisoft antivirus
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <bob.nuckolls@cox.net> At 10:47 PM 9/16/2003 -0700, you wrote: >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Rob W M Shipley" <rob@robsglass.com> > >NOT RV RELATED >I'm posting this to the list since I'm aware that many listers use this >antivirus software. >I've been using their free offering for a while now - in fact since turned >on to it by another lister. In the last week I've been making some >changes with my ISP and some server problems have arisen. >I am now unable to receive my scheduled updates and after a complete >reinstall on one computer I cannot get a response from AVG to the request >for a password to activate the new installation. >I would be very grateful if anyone can help me figure out if there is a >problem with AVG or my ISP's server. >I really would like to be able to continue using this program but since >there is no reply to the activation code request I'm wondering if they >have discontinued the free antivirus service. >Any help appreciated. We've used AVG here for years with excellent service. I checked the orders server this morning and it had automatically downloaded the latest update for the free version but the computer on my desk had not. I did a manual download but it was exceedingly slow . . . they usually take about 10 seconds, this one took several minutes. I suspect there is a bottleneck in their connection somewhere. If you're trying to install the free version, try 6-XFREE-522613-AVG for a serial number. Bob . . .


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:19:29 AM PST US
    From: "George Bass" <George_Bass_0@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Re: AVG / Grisoft antivirus
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "George Bass" <George_Bass_0@hotmail.com> Rob; I have no idea why you are experiencing the problem you stated, with the AVG folks, but, I can tell you that I had a similar problem a few days ago (maybe a wek now) with my copy of their anti-virus software. For some unknown reason, I was unable to do an update to the version/copy that I had on my system (tried several methods). Finally, I just did a COMPLETE un-install, re-booted the machine and went to the AVG site again & downloaded another copy, as a new user, and it has been working fine ever since. Sometimes these things seem to have a mind of their own and I would be very rich if I could come up with a method/device to analize one. Good luck with your efforts, as I don't know of any other software that is as good/any better than AVG for protection. George ---


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:39:20 AM PST US
    From: "Eric M. Jones" <emjones@charter.net>
    Subject: AOA Indicator
    HTML_MESSAGE --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Eric M. Jones" <emjones@charter.net> Check these out-- http://www.supercub.org/woe/woe0402.php http://www.allstar.fiu.edu/aerojava/PSSI.htm Then search Google (Whenever someone asks for info I shrug and say "Google", I wish they had named it something powerful and elegant-sounding, because we're probably going to wind up worshipping it!") Then consider that maybe the pressure type is not the best type. A small flying horizontal vane on the tail would work. As would two strain gauges on your pitot tube. A million way to do this job if you want to build your own. . Eric


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:11:29 AM PST US
    From: <jimk36@comcast.net>
    Subject: Battery Ground
    FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: <jimk36@comcast.net> Bob-- Re metal airframe, tractor engine, battery in aft fuselage -- do you recommend ground wire from battery to firewall ground? In addition to grounding to airframe at the battery location? Or not needed? Sorry to bother you with such a basic [read dumb] question but it wasn't clear to me in the "Connection". Jim


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:40:33 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <bob.nuckolls@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: Failure analysis to plagiarize?
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <bob.nuckolls@cox.net> At 11:43 PM 9/15/2003 -0400, you wrote: >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Eric M. Jones" <emjones@charter.net> > >Type into Google "free fault tree analysis" and see what happens. > >Eric A "failure analysis" or as cited in my writings "failure mode effects analysis" (FMEA) is much different than a fault tree analysis. The later is used to guestimate the probability of any particular system becoming unusable due to failure of an associated component or sub-system. Those-who-would- protect-us-from-ourselves are fond of this tool for deciding whether or not some proposed system will be blessed for use in flight-for-hire aircraft . . . The goal of this tool is to help drive a system design down to less than 1 failure per million flight hours. Not easy, always difficult, and not particularly exact. FMEA is different. Here we can sort airframe components into two categories . . . necessary and convenient for comfortable completion of flight. When a component falls into the "necessary" category, what's required to make sure the services of this system and/or its backup are available? The basic reliability assumption we're making here is the probability of DUAL failure of primary and backup systems in any single three-hour flight is exceedingly low . . . Beyond that, system configuration by FMEA is more of a design and operating philosophy exercise where as fault tree analysis is an analytical approach to reliability prediction. I much prefer the latter because it makes us think in terms of failure tolerance as opposed to failure proofing . . . I'll suggest FMEA is much preferred for our purposes because it is so easy to understand and depends on perfectly ordinary logic and makes good use of inexpensive components. Bob . . .


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:16:08 AM PST US
    From: "Bob Kuc" <bkuc1@tampabay.rr.com>
    Subject: LED position lights
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Bob Kuc" <bkuc1@tampabay.rr.com> While sitting at the local FSDO, and looking through a few mags, there was an advertisement for Whelen. Apparently they now sell position and anti-collision LED lights that have been TSO'd. Bob ---


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:00:16 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <bob.nuckolls@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: Battery Ground
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <bob.nuckolls@cox.net> At 12:19 PM 9/17/2003 -0400, you wrote: >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: <jimk36@comcast.net> > >Bob-- > >Re metal airframe, tractor engine, battery in aft fuselage -- do you >recommend ground wire from battery to firewall ground? In addition to >grounding to airframe at the battery location? Or not needed? > >Sorry to bother you with such a basic [read dumb] question but it wasn't >clear to me in the "Connection". If it were my airplane, I'd avoid using any structure for electrical conductivity aside from the few components I've cited recently. Obviously, this argues with apparently successful machines that ground engines through the mounts and tie system grounds to what ever structure is handiest . . . Your system will not refuse to function if you choose the traditional route. Bob . . .


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:19:49 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <bob.nuckolls@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: Signs of alt starting to fail
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <bob.nuckolls@cox.net> At 06:00 AM 9/17/2003 -0700, you wrote: >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Scott Bilinski ><bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com> > >Is there any way to tell if your alternator is on its last leg? What are >the signs? Do you have a doubtful alternator? Progressive failures tend to be wear-out issues. Bearings getting noisy, brushes worn so that voltage regulator is having trouble keeping output steady . . . failure beyond these two issues tend to be catastrophic . . . something breaks rendering the alternator crippled or inoperative. A balanced ND alternator should run to TBO on your engine with no more effort than to keep a good belt on it and properly tensioned. Bob . . .


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:05:11 PM PST US
    From: "David Carter" <dcarter@datarecall.net>
    Subject: Fw: RV-List: Ground block location
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "David Carter" <dcarter@datarecall.net> Fwd'g this nice reply from Paul Bessing on the RV-list to Aeroelectric list - WHigg 1170 had asked a few days ago. (Very nice Website, Paul Besing!! Can you e-mail me off-list how you "do" that website? Special software? Lots of work?! <grin>) David Carter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Besing" <azpilot@extremezone.com> Subject: RV-List: Ground block location > --> RV-List message posted by: "Paul Besing" <azpilot@extremezone.com> > > Here is a picture of mine. Worked fine here. > > http://www.lacodeworks.com/besing/wiring.htm > > Paul Besing > RV-6A Sold (Waiting on the RV-10) > http://www.lacodeworks.com/besing > Kitlog Pro Builder's Log Software > http://www.kitlog.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Carter" <dcarter@datarecall.net> > To: "RV-list" <rv-list@matronics.com> > Subject: RV-List: Fw: AeroElectric-List: Ground block location > > > > --> RV-List message posted by: "David Carter" <dcarter@datarecall.net> > > > > Fwd'd from Aeroelectric List for RV-specific response. > > > > DC > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <bob.nuckolls@cox.net> > > To: <aeroelectric-list@matronics.com> > > Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Ground block location > > > > > > > --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" > > <bob.nuckolls@cox.net> > > > > > > At 12:18 PM 9/13/2003 -0400, you wrote: > > > >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: WHigg1170@aol.com > > > > > > > >Hello I have a question on the B&C 24 terminal ground block location. I > > don't > > > >have the engine or mount and I want to place the ground block on the > > cabin > > > >side of the firewall but don't know were to put it so it won't be in > the > > > >way and > > > >also still use vans #2 cables that came with the wiring harness kit. > > Thanks > > > > > > > >Bill > > > >RV-6 > > > > > > Can any RV builders help Bill out with this? > > > > > > Bob . . . > > > > > > > > > > > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --