Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 12:51 AM - Alternator Wiring (Neil Henderson)
2. 04:40 AM - Re: King KX 145 push to talk (mailbox bob at mail.flyboybob.com)
3. 07:42 AM - Voltage Stability Problems (Ken Harrill)
4. 07:42 AM - Fault Tree+ service (Fergus Kyle)
5. 12:57 PM - [ Richard Riley ] : New Email List Photo Share Available! (Email List Photo Shares)
6. 06:16 PM - Re: less expensive power supply with (Neil Clayton)
7. 08:07 PM - Re: less expensive power supply with Aeroflash heads (Larry Bowen)
Message 1
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Alternator Wiring |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Neil Henderson" <neil.mo51@btopenworld.com>
Listers
I have obtained an almost new Nipon Denzo alternator off a Toyota which I intend
fitting to a Lyco320 In my RV9.
I have a couple of questions. Firstly I assume it's internally regulated although
it has a 3 wire socket, what are the 3 connections for and is a mating plug
readily available. Van's sell one that looks as if fits.
Secondly it is currently fitted with a flat belt pulley which I need to change
this to a V belt. I seem to recall Bob Avery used to sell a larger dia pulley,
is this worth considering and if not could anyone direct me to source of standard
sized pulleys.
Thanks for your help.
Neil Henderson RV9-A n/r Aylesbury UK
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | King KX 145 push to talk |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "mailbox bob at mail.flyboybob.com" <bob@flyboybob.com>
Jeff,
According to the KK-145 Installation Manual the "Mic Key-Comm" is connected
to pin 7 of the P401 connector. Viewed from the rear, P401 is the top
connector and the pins are numbered from the right starting with pin 1.
Just as a double check, your receive coax should be connected to pins 9-11
of P401. I tried to scan the schematic to send to you but the manual is so
old that it took maximum resolution to get a readable copy. With that, the
file was 14Mb which is too big for e-mail.
Regards,
Bob Lee
______________________________
N52BL KR2 Suwanee, GA 30024
91% done only 51% to go!
Phone/Fax: 770/844-7501
mailto:bob@flyboybob.com
http://flyboybob.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Jeff
Deuchar
Subject: AeroElectric-List: King KX 145 push to talk
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Jeff Deuchar" <deucharj@telus.net>
Hi all,
Does any one have a wiring diagram for a King KX 145? If so, can you tell
me which wire(s) is for the push to talk activation?
Thanks in advance,
Jeff
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Voltage Stability Problems |
Bob,
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Ken Harrill <KHarrill@osa.state.sc.us>
I am using a generic Ford regulator and I am having problems with voltage
instability. If I connect the field terminal on the regulator (A and S)
directly to the buss terminal of the master contactor, the voltage becomes
stable. I tried connecting the field terminal to several points in the
circuit between the master contactor and the regulator. It seems that the
further downstream from the master contactor that I make the connection the
higher the resulting system voltage. The instability seems to be associated
with the circuit breaker ( I am using OV circuitry per the Aeroelectric
Connection). I have installed a new voltage regulator and tried two
different circuit breakers without improvement. My questions are:
1. Is the "S" terminal of the regulator the "sense" input? If so could I
connect this terminal permanently, thru a fuselink, to the buss terminal of
the master contactor?
2. Why would the circuit breaker cause instability? The two that I tried
are Klixon 5 AMP breakers. Both show .6 OHM resistance. I plan to buy
another breaker in case I have two bad ones.
3. What is a acceptable system voltage? When the field wire is connected
directly to the buss terminal of the master contactor, the system voltage is
14.4 and stable. When connected to the buss side of the breaker, the system
voltage is 14.7. When connected to the regulator side of the breaker, the
system voltage is 14.9 to 15.3 and is unstable.
Any help will be appreciated, as always.
Ken Harrill
RV-6, 235 hours
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Fault Tree+ service |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Fergus Kyle" <VE3LVO@rac.ca>
I sent out the message below. I just wanted to acknowledge Fault Tree's
Joe Belland
Technical Support, Isograph Direct
(949) 798-5607
who patiently pointed out the Windows path to uninstalling his program (to
someone who should have known).
That's diligent salesmanship.
Ferg Kyle
Time: 07:35:45 AM PST US
From: "Fergus Kyle" <VE3LVO@rac.ca>
Subject: AeroElectric-List: Fault tree
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Fergus Kyle" <VE3LVO@rac.ca>
With my hairtigger reaction, I neatly downloaded "Fault Tree" at the behest
of some worthy on net - thinking I would be miles ahead while I had the
time.
Unfortunately, it came to pass that it was not the fault system
which the group would find useful. It now sits like Oomph in my hard disc
and I find no easy way to "uninstall" it.
Is there some knowledgeable guardian who might advise me how to dump
the megas for all time?
Regards, Ferg
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | [ Richard Riley ] : New Email List Photo Share Available! |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Email List Photo Shares <pictures@matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available:
Poster: Richard Riley <richard@riley.net>
Subject: B&C Backup Alternator Failure
http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/richard@riley.net.09.27.2003/index.html
o Main Photo Share Index
http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
o Submitting a Photo Share
If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the
following information along with your email message and files:
1) Email List or Lists that they are related to:
2) Your Full Name:
3) Your Email Address:
4) One line Subject description:
5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic:
6) One-line Description of each photo or file:
Email the information above and your files and photos to:
pictures@matronics.com
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: less expensive power supply with |
Aeroflash heads
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Neil Clayton <harvey4@earthlink.net>
Mark....thanks for your interesting post. I saved your mail with the intent
of researching the references you cite at the RV archives. But I can't find
anything. I expect it's not the RV-8 list that I know about, but some
other. I need this info since I'm doing my strobe research now. Could you
point me where I can read everything you refer to?
Thanks
Neil
At 02:17 PM 9/5/03, you wrote:
>--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: czechsix@juno.com
>
>
>Guys, I did quite a bit of research before getting the XPak 904 and
>documented it in nauseating detail in the RV List archives, search for
>"cometflash on a beer budget". There were 2 or 3 posts with this subject
>line which will probably answer all your questions and some you haven't
>thought of yet : ) No reason to say it all over again here, but a few
>points of interest:
>
>You're correct that the Aeroflash bulbs cannot handle the output of the
>904....based on their specs it would burn them up pretty fast. Go with
>Whelen heads...I got 'em cheap at a salvage yard (strobes usually survive
>airplane accidents, so they have lots laying around).
>
>Yes these commercial power supplies have lots of neato strobe patterns but
>not all of them are legal for aircraft use. The regs spell out the
>acceptable flash rates (and I quoted them in the aformentioned archived
>material). If I recall correctly, the Xpak 904's "low power" mode had an
>unacceptably high flash rate so I would not use it.
>
>As for reducing the power output when only two strobe heads are installed,
>this depends on how you configure it. The 904 *can be* configured for
>full output meant for 4 strobes into only two strobes, which is the beauty
>of it, because the Whelen heads can handle this amount of energy (it's the
>same as what they get from Whelen's top of the line power supply, the
>HDA-CF Cometflash system).
>
>If you get a different power supply, you're on your own for making sure it
>meets the requirements and is compatible with the heads you're driving for
>power, flash rate, etc. NOVA has excellent customer support and the
>archived stuff I wrote a couple years ago is based on lengthy discussions
>with Eugene Able at NOVA.
>
>--Mark Navratil
>Cedar Rapids, Iowa
>RV-8A N2D in painting hell...
>
>Time: 12:49:18 PM PST US
>From: Sigma Eta Aero <sigmatero@yahoo.com>
>Subject: AeroElectric-List: less expensive power supply with Aeroflash heads
>
>--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Sigma Eta Aero <sigmatero@yahoo.com>
>
>Just got off the phone with Nova's tech guy and he pulled up the Aeroflash
>strobe
>specs and indeed the 90 watt X-Pac looks like it's a little hot for these.
>
>
>Called Strobes-N-More and it sounds like the best bang for the buck here
>is their
>EPS-40X Series which has the nice adjustable patterns and should fire up the
>10 joules just fine. About right if you don't need the blinding
>Whelans. Plus
>you can choose from lots of neato strobe patterns :)
>
>It has an output energy of 34 joules. I assume that the FAA reqs means 20
>joules
>*total* between the two strobes, right? That's the way the Aeroflashes get
>away with double 10 jouled ones??
>
>All said and done it's about $305 for this setup which is a lot nicer than
>$772
>for the Whelans and $430 for the Aeroflashes (with their supply).
>
>Don't want to get caught in the TANSTAAFL so what am I missing here?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Joa
>
>The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
>Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
>
>
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | less expensive power supply with Aeroflash heads |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Larry Bowen" <Larry@bowenaero.com>
The archives of the list that started it all: The RV-List
http://www.matronics.com/searching/
(I'm using the 904 too.)
-
Larry Bowen
Larry@BowenAero.com
http://BowenAero.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Clayton [mailto:harvey4@earthlink.net]
> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 9:16 PM
> To: aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: less expensive power supply
> with Aeroflash heads
>
>
> --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Neil Clayton
> --> <harvey4@earthlink.net>
>
> Mark....thanks for your interesting post. I saved your mail
> with the intent
> of researching the references you cite at the RV archives.
> But I can't find
> anything. I expect it's not the RV-8 list that I know about, but some
> other. I need this info since I'm doing my strobe research
> now. Could you
> point me where I can read everything you refer to?
>
> Thanks
> Neil
>
>
> At 02:17 PM 9/5/03, you wrote:
> >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: czechsix@juno.com
> >
> >
> >Guys, I did quite a bit of research before getting the XPak 904 and
> >documented it in nauseating detail in the RV List archives,
> search for
> >"cometflash on a beer budget". There were 2 or 3 posts with
> this subject
> >line which will probably answer all your questions and some
> you haven't
> >thought of yet : ) No reason to say it all over again here,
> but a few
> >points of interest:
> >
> >You're correct that the Aeroflash bulbs cannot handle the
> output of the
> >904....based on their specs it would burn them up pretty
> fast. Go with
> >Whelen heads...I got 'em cheap at a salvage yard (strobes
> usually survive
> >airplane accidents, so they have lots laying around).
> >
> >Yes these commercial power supplies have lots of neato
> strobe patterns
> >but
> >not all of them are legal for aircraft use. The regs spell out the
> >acceptable flash rates (and I quoted them in the
> aformentioned archived
> >material). If I recall correctly, the Xpak 904's "low
> power" mode had an
> >unacceptably high flash rate so I would not use it.
> >
> >As for reducing the power output when only two strobe heads are
> >installed,
> >this depends on how you configure it. The 904 *can be*
> configured for
> >full output meant for 4 strobes into only two strobes, which
> is the beauty
> >of it, because the Whelen heads can handle this amount of
> energy (it's the
> >same as what they get from Whelen's top of the line power
> supply, the
> >HDA-CF Cometflash system).
> >
> >If you get a different power supply, you're on your own for
> making sure
> >it
> >meets the requirements and is compatible with the heads
> you're driving for
> >power, flash rate, etc. NOVA has excellent customer support and the
> >archived stuff I wrote a couple years ago is based on
> lengthy discussions
> >with Eugene Able at NOVA.
> >
> >--Mark Navratil
> >Cedar Rapids, Iowa
> >RV-8A N2D in painting hell...
> >
> >Time: 12:49:18 PM PST US
> >From: Sigma Eta Aero <sigmatero@yahoo.com>
> >Subject: AeroElectric-List: less expensive power supply with
> Aeroflash
> >heads
> >
> >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Sigma Eta Aero
> >--> <sigmatero@yahoo.com>
> >
> >Just got off the phone with Nova's tech guy and he pulled up the
> >Aeroflash
> >strobe
> >specs and indeed the 90 watt X-Pac looks like it's a little
> hot for these.
> >
> >
> >Called Strobes-N-More and it sounds like the best bang for the buck
> >here
> >is their
> >EPS-40X Series which has the nice adjustable patterns and
> should fire up the
> >10 joules just fine. About right if you don't need the blinding
> >Whelans. Plus
> >you can choose from lots of neato strobe patterns :)
> >
> >It has an output energy of 34 joules. I assume that the FAA
> reqs means
> >20
> >joules
> >*total* between the two strobes, right? That's the way the
> Aeroflashes get
> >away with double 10 jouled ones??
> >
> >All said and done it's about $305 for this setup which is a
> lot nicer
> >than
> >$772
> >for the Whelans and $430 for the Aeroflashes (with their supply).
> >
> >Don't want to get caught in the TANSTAAFL so what am I missing here?
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >Joa
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|