AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Fri 04/30/04


Total Messages Posted: 12



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:59 AM - Re: Re: Trimmers etc. (Brian Lloyd)
     2. 03:03 AM - Re: Avionics Cooling fans - blowers (Brian Lloyd)
     3. 06:58 AM - KMA-20 Pinout ? (Pascal Gosselin)
     4. 07:04 AM - Re: Re: Trimmers etc. (Garrison Sem)
     5. 07:59 AM - Re: Coax placement (CardinalNSB@aol.com)
     6. 08:27 AM - Re: KMA-20 Pinout ? (Sean Spencer)
     7. 08:32 AM - Static Source (F1Rocket@comcast.net)
     8. 08:39 AM - Re: Re: Trimmers etc. (Brian Lloyd)
     9. 09:26 AM - Re: Re: Trimmers etc. (Jim Stone)
    10. 10:33 AM - Re: Static Source (Brian Lloyd)
    11. 10:52 AM - Re: Static Source (Sean Spencer)
    12. 11:17 AM - Re: Static Source (Chad Robinson)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:59:45 AM PST US
    From: Brian Lloyd <brianl@lloyd.com>
    Subject: Re: Trimmers etc.
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brianl@lloyd.com> Fiveonepw@aol.com wrote: > 3) How do you KNOW there is a trim runaway???? Uh, airplane pitches, rolls, or yaws in an undesired direction and it keeps getting worse. > You might only feel something > is really amiss. Or maybe you could figure it out but John Denver might not. Oh, you will know. And it will scare the s--t out of you when it happens. > FWIW- if an uncommanded out-of-trim condition manifests itself (gee, why am I > pointed at the ground?!) or any other odd situation grabs my attention while > life is good, my laser guided finger finds the Master switch pronto- damn, > didn't need at those distractions anyway- This does not work for IFR flight using a glass attitude indicator. Dark clouds and a dark panel do the anal sphincter no good. It is for this reason that I am quite wary of an all-power trim system without mechanical backup. A servo with a friction clutch driving a standard mechanical trim system strikes me as a good balance. An electric servo embedded in the horizontal stab as the only way to control pitch trim leaves a cold feeling in the pit of my stomach when I contemplate electric trim failure scenarios. Aircraft with low stick forces (the RV series comes to mind here) can be flown without too much difficulty in a serious out-of-trim situation. Aircraft with heavier stick forces might be unflyable. For this reason you should go try to fly your airplane with the trim set to both stops to verify you have the strength and control authority to land the airplane. Do it at altitude first please. My RV-4 had the original pitch trim lever on the throttle quadrant. It was a bit touchy but worked OK when you got used to it. It would have been relatively easy to add electric trim to that yet still be able to overpower a runaway servo. I know, electrical servos are very reliable but not as reliable as a push-pull cable in my book. -- Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza brianl@lloyd.com Suite 201 http://www.lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802 +1.340.998.9447 (voice) +1.360.838.9669 (fax) There is a time to laud one's country and a time to protest. A good citizen is prepared to do either as the need arises.


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:03:25 AM PST US
    From: Brian Lloyd <brianl@lloyd.com>
    Subject: Re: Avionics Cooling fans - blowers
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brianl@lloyd.com> Jeffrey W. Skiba wrote: > So other than the TSO paper work what else makes them so expensive?? Liability insurance for the manufacturer in addition to all the work they had to go through for FAA/PMA/STC approval for permanent installation in certified aircraft. Add that to the relatively small market and you have the formula for high cost. > Is there something special there doing to contain EMI - RFI ??? I mean > computer cooling fans are dirt cheap, and able to cool electronics parts in > computers, why can't they be used for Experimental aircraft ? That is the beauty of experimental. You are free to try what you want. Computer cooling fans are just fine. -- Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza brianl@lloyd.com Suite 201 http://www.lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802 +1.340.998.9447 (voice) +1.360.838.9669 (fax) There is a time to laud one's country and a time to protest. A good citizen is prepared to do either as the need arises.


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:58:28 AM PST US
    From: Pascal Gosselin <pascal@aeroteknic.com>
    Subject: KMA-20 Pinout ?
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Pascal Gosselin <pascal@aeroteknic.com> Would really appreciate it someone could email or fax me a KMA-20 pinout. fax (450) 676-2760 email pascal@aeroteknic.com -Pascal


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:04:32 AM PST US
    From: "Garrison Sem" <chasm711@msn.com>
    Subject: Re: Trimmers etc.
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Garrison Sem" <chasm711@msn.com> Get a three position switch, on, off, momentary on, wire it "up" normal on, "center" off, "down" momentary on reverse. If the relay or switch sticks you can turn it off and "bump" it back to in trim. That should cover most failure modes. On my airplane the trim system also has one of the few circutbreakers. If the servo fails its not a big deal in cruise and if the trim is towards the stop and fails you should just be taking off or landing so a quick return is easy. I worry more about pine bark beetles. Paul Schattauer rv8 #80009 N808PS 50 hrs and getting painted >From: Brian Lloyd <brianl@lloyd.com> >Reply-To: aeroelectric-list@matronics.com >To: aeroelectric-list@matronics.com >Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Re: Trimmers etc. >Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:58:31 +0100 > >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brianl@lloyd.com> > >Fiveonepw@aol.com wrote: > > > 3) How do you KNOW there is a trim runaway???? > >Uh, airplane pitches, rolls, or yaws in an undesired direction and it keeps >getting worse. > > > You might only feel something > > is really amiss. Or maybe you could figure it out but John Denver might >not. > >Oh, you will know. And it will scare the s--t out of you when it happens. > > > FWIW- if an uncommanded out-of-trim condition manifests itself (gee, why >am I > > pointed at the ground?!) or any other odd situation grabs my attention >while > > life is good, my laser guided finger finds the Master switch pronto- >damn, > > didn't need at those distractions anyway- > >This does not work for IFR flight using a glass attitude indicator. Dark >clouds and a dark panel do the anal sphincter no good. > >It is for this reason that I am quite wary of an all-power trim system >without mechanical backup. A servo with a friction clutch driving a >standard mechanical trim system strikes me as a good balance. An electric >servo embedded in the horizontal stab as the only way to control pitch trim >leaves a cold feeling in the pit of my stomach when I contemplate electric >trim failure scenarios. > >Aircraft with low stick forces (the RV series comes to mind here) can be >flown without too much difficulty in a serious out-of-trim situation. >Aircraft with heavier stick forces might be unflyable. For this reason you >should go try to fly your airplane with the trim set to both stops to >verify you have the strength and control authority to land the airplane. >Do it at altitude first please. > >My RV-4 had the original pitch trim lever on the throttle quadrant. It was >a bit touchy but worked OK when you got used to it. It would have been >relatively easy to add electric trim to that yet still be able to overpower >a runaway servo. > >I know, electrical servos are very reliable but not as reliable as a >push-pull cable in my book. > >-- >Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza >brianl@lloyd.com Suite 201 >http://www.lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802 >+1.340.998.9447 (voice) +1.360.838.9669 (fax) > >There is a time to laud one's country and a time to protest. >A good citizen is prepared to do either as the need arises. > > Watch LIVE baseball games on your computer with MLB.TV, included with MSN Premium!


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:59:10 AM PST US
    From: CardinalNSB@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Coax placement
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: CardinalNSB@aol.com Thank you all for the replies, it doesn't appear there are any reasons to "separate" the coax runs, I will keep the antennas separated as much as possible. I was planning on rg400 coax, I don't know about LMR400 coax. Cliff, the Monry 300 traffic detector is highly praised in the Cessna forum, as I understand the best reception is to put a transponder antenna top and bottam and run into a splitter instead of using the "portable" antenna. I haven't bought one yet but since I was in the "antenna" mode of the project I am going to put them in. I don't remember the type of splitter to use, I did email to the company and they explained what to use I can get it if you need. Sincerely, Skip Simpson


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:27:38 AM PST US
    From: "Sean Spencer" <sean.s@cnwltd.com>
    Subject: KMA-20 Pinout ?
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Sean Spencer" <sean.s@cnwltd.com> I just faxed it to that number if you cannot read it let me know and I will try to scan it and email it. Sean 509-886-1036 or 2516 -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Pascal Gosselin Subject: AeroElectric-List: KMA-20 Pinout ? --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Pascal Gosselin <pascal@aeroteknic.com> Would really appreciate it someone could email or fax me a KMA-20 pinout. fax (450) 676-2760 email pascal@aeroteknic.com -Pascal == == == == --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. ---


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:32:10 AM PST US
    From: F1Rocket@comcast.net
    Subject: Static Source
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: F1Rocket@comcast.net While organizing the "stuff" behind my panel, I realized that I have four instruments that require connection to the static line; altimeter, EFIS, autopilot, and blind encoder. Is it okay to just hook these up in series? Should I tee the line and put two on one branch and two on the other? Does it make any difference? Inquiring minds would like to know. Randy http://f1rocket.home.comcast.net/ > --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Pascal Gosselin <pascal@aeroteknic.com> > > > Would really appreciate it someone could email or fax me a KMA-20 pinout. > > fax (450) 676-2760 > > email pascal@aeroteknic.com > > -Pascal > > > > > >


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:39:20 AM PST US
    From: Brian Lloyd <brianl@lloyd.com>
    Subject: Re: Trimmers etc.
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brianl@lloyd.com> Garrison Sem wrote: > --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Garrison Sem" <chasm711@msn.com> > > > Get a three position switch, on, off, momentary on, wire it "up" normal on, > "center" off, "down" momentary on reverse. If the relay or switch sticks > you can turn it off and "bump" it back to in trim. That should cover most > failure modes. On my airplane the trim system also has one of the few > circutbreakers. If the servo fails its not a big deal in cruise and if the > trim is towards the stop and fails you should just be taking off or landing > so a quick return is easy. I worry more about pine bark beetles. RVs are less of a problem because of their low stick forces but a fair number of people will still have trouble landing their airplane with the trim at the stops. Before you dismiss my concerns so offhandedly I still suggest you try flying your airplane with the trim at the stops. My experience with trim runaway is that the first reaction is to freeze and ask what's going on and/or counter the trim force with the stick and *then* realize your trim servo is running away. The next momentary lapse will be to realize you have to pull the breaker/fuse/switch. I bet that more than a couple of seconds will elapse. Now your airplane is seriously out of trim. And whatever trim setting it is at is probably going to be something very very different from the trim setting you normally use on short final for landing. Better to find out at altitude when you are expecting the problem than when you are on short final and the switch sticks as you trim nose-up as you set up for flare. Most people have never had to hold forward pressure on the stick to land. Any other momentary lapse of attention is asking for a low-altitude stall incident (accident?) in that situation. Too many people think about how things work and not enough think about how they fail. I also know that few people have had an airplane totally scare the s--t out of them. > Paul Schattauer > rv8 #80009 N808PS > 50 hrs and getting painted -- Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza brianl@lloyd.com Suite 201 http://www.lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802 +1.340.998.9447 (voice) +1.360.838.9669 (fax) There is a time to laud one's country and a time to protest. A good citizen is prepared to do either as the need arises.


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:26:05 AM PST US
    From: "Jim Stone" <jrstone@insightbb.com>
    Subject: Re: Trimmers etc.
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Jim Stone" <jrstone@insightbb.com> "I worry more about pine bark beetles." Are they the ones that cause the smoke to escape from electronics? Jim Do not archive > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Garrison Sem" <chasm711@msn.com> Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Re: Trimmers etc. > --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Garrison Sem" <chasm711@msn.com> > > > Get a three position switch, on, off, momentary on, wire it "up" normal on, > "center" off, "down" momentary on reverse. If the relay or switch sticks > you can turn it off and "bump" it back to in trim. That should cover most > failure modes. On my airplane the trim system also has one of the few > circutbreakers. If the servo fails its not a big deal in cruise and if the > trim is towards the stop and fails you should just be taking off or landing > so a quick return is easy. > Paul Schattauer > rv8 #80009 N808PS > 50 hrs and getting painted > > >From: Brian Lloyd <brianl@lloyd.com> > >Reply-To: aeroelectric-list@matronics.com > >To: aeroelectric-list@matronics.com > >Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Re: Trimmers etc. > >Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:58:31 +0100 > > > >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brianl@lloyd.com> > > > >Fiveonepw@aol.com wrote: > > > > > 3) How do you KNOW there is a trim runaway???? > > > >Uh, airplane pitches, rolls, or yaws in an undesired direction and it keeps > >getting worse. > > > > > You might only feel something > > > is really amiss. Or maybe you could figure it out but John Denver might > >not. > > > >Oh, you will know. And it will scare the s--t out of you when it happens. > > > > > FWIW- if an uncommanded out-of-trim condition manifests itself (gee, why > >am I > > > pointed at the ground?!) or any other odd situation grabs my attention > >while > > > life is good, my laser guided finger finds the Master switch pronto- > >damn, > > > didn't need at those distractions anyway- > > > >This does not work for IFR flight using a glass attitude indicator. Dark > >clouds and a dark panel do the anal sphincter no good. > > > >It is for this reason that I am quite wary of an all-power trim system > >without mechanical backup. A servo with a friction clutch driving a > >standard mechanical trim system strikes me as a good balance. An electric > >servo embedded in the horizontal stab as the only way to control pitch trim > >leaves a cold feeling in the pit of my stomach when I contemplate electric > >trim failure scenarios. > > > >Aircraft with low stick forces (the RV series comes to mind here) can be > >flown without too much difficulty in a serious out-of-trim situation. > >Aircraft with heavier stick forces might be unflyable. For this reason you > >should go try to fly your airplane with the trim set to both stops to > >verify you have the strength and control authority to land the airplane. > >Do it at altitude first please. > > > >My RV-4 had the original pitch trim lever on the throttle quadrant. It was > >a bit touchy but worked OK when you got used to it. It would have been > >relatively easy to add electric trim to that yet still be able to overpower > >a runaway servo. > > > >I know, electrical servos are very reliable but not as reliable as a > >push-pull cable in my book. > > > >-- > >Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza > >brianl@lloyd.com Suite 201 > >http://www.lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802 > >+1.340.998.9447 (voice) +1.360.838.9669 (fax) > > > >There is a time to laud one's country and a time to protest. > >A good citizen is prepared to do either as the need arises. > > > > > > Watch LIVE baseball games on your computer with MLB.TV, included with MSN > Premium! > >


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:33:53 AM PST US
    From: Brian Lloyd <brianl@lloyd.com>
    Subject: Re: Static Source
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brianl@lloyd.com> F1Rocket@comcast.net wrote: > --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: F1Rocket@comcast.net > > While organizing the "stuff" behind my panel, I realized that I have > four instruments that require connection to the static line; > altimeter, EFIS, autopilot, and blind encoder. > > Is it okay to just hook these up in series? Yes. > Should I tee the line > and put two on one branch and two on the other? Not necessary. > Does it make any difference? No. The static line has no fluid flow in it so it just needs to ensure that all the attached devices are at the same pressure. Make sure there are no leaks and you are good to go. -- Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza brianl@lloyd.com Suite 201 http://www.lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802 +1.340.998.9447 (voice) +1.360.838.9669 (fax) There is a time to laud one's country and a time to protest. A good citizen is prepared to do either as the need arises.


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:52:24 AM PST US
    From: "Sean Spencer" <sean.s@cnwltd.com>
    Subject: Static Source
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Sean Spencer" <sean.s@cnwltd.com> Static air is just that there is no flow through it only pressure changes it will make no difference in the system how you route your lines. The system all comes from one point inless you have a alt. system, the only benift to running them in series or through a manifold would be organization some times its keeps the area behind the panel cleaner and easier to make changes later. -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of F1Rocket@comcast.net Subject: AeroElectric-List: Static Source --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: F1Rocket@comcast.net While organizing the "stuff" behind my panel, I realized that I have four instruments that require connection to the static line; altimeter, EFIS, autopilot, and blind encoder. Is it okay to just hook these up in series? Should I tee the line and put two on one branch and two on the other? Does it make any difference? Inquiring minds would like to know. Randy http://f1rocket.home.comcast.net/ > --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Pascal Gosselin <pascal@aeroteknic.com> > > > Would really appreciate it someone could email or fax me a KMA-20 pinout. > > fax (450) 676-2760 > > email pascal@aeroteknic.com > > -Pascal > > > > > > == == == == --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. ---


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:17:49 AM PST US
    From: Chad Robinson <crobinson@rfgonline.com>
    Subject: Re: Static Source
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Chad Robinson <crobinson@rfgonline.com> Brian Lloyd wrote: > No. The static line has no fluid flow in it so it just needs to ensure > that all the attached devices are at the same pressure. Make sure there > are no leaks and you are good to go. Another question on the same topic. I've seen people install static reservoirs, basically small sealed bottles on a T in the static line. I know these help stabilize instrument displays, especially altitude, especially in turbulence. But just how much do they help? Are they worth the effort, or is it really something for certain types of flying, like acrobatic, or hard-IFR? Regards, Chad




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --