AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Wed 10/20/04


Total Messages Posted: 20



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:18 AM - Re: Report on auto HID lights for aircraft (James Foerster)
     2. 04:39 AM - Re: Shielded serial cables (Brian Lloyd)
     3. 05:13 AM - Re: What's going on ??? (cgalley)
     4. 05:19 AM - Re: Rumination: Automatic standby fuel pump? (Ken)
     5. 06:08 AM - Re: Shielded serial cables (Lloyd, Daniel R.)
     6. 06:17 AM - Re: CoolSolder (Scott Bilinski)
     7. 06:23 AM - Re: Rumination: Automatic standby fuel pump? (Lloyd, Daniel R.)
     8. 07:00 AM - Re: Shielded serial cables (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     9. 07:08 AM - Re: Shielded serial cables (Lloyd, Daniel R.)
    10. 07:44 AM - Re: Re: Report on auto HID lights for aircraft (SportAV8R@aol.com)
    11. 07:55 AM - Re: Rumination: Automatic standby fuel pump? (Gary Casey)
    12. 08:01 AM - Re: Re: Report on auto HID lights for aircraft (Carlos Sa)
    13. 09:01 AM - Re: Re: Rumination: Automatic standby fuel (Richard Riley)
    14. 09:01 AM - Re: Re: Report on auto HID lights for (Richard Riley)
    15. 10:58 AM - automatic standby fuel pump (The Minearts)
    16. 03:25 PM - Flap Motor Wiring (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    17. 05:04 PM - Automatic standby fuel pump (Frankhsmit@wmconnect.com)
    18. 07:50 PM - Re: CoolSolder (Scott Jackson)
    19. 08:13 PM - Copper foil antenna question (mike_tailwind@att.net)
    20. 09:11 PM - Response to Copper foil antenna question (Jim Stone)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:18:38 AM PST US
    From: "James Foerster" <jmfpublic@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: Report on auto HID lights for aircraft
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "James Foerster" <jmfpublic@comcast.net> Steve, you asked: "Did you evaluate the xevision lights in your search and if so, why did you go this way? See: http://www.aerovisions.com/hid/hid_aircraft_kits.html#conversionkits I had run across this site about a year ago. They were not posting prices then, and when I called, the units ran about $700 each.. They now have more offerings, and the prices are better. The Hella unit is still two for $640, so if you know someone who also needs the HID light, this is a better price. I agree that XeVision is now a more reasonable buy, and I'm interested in the DC ballast that they talk about, but seem to not yet offer. Jim Foerster


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:39:27 AM PST US
    From: Brian Lloyd <brianl@lloyd.com>
    Subject: Re: Shielded serial cables
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brianl@lloyd.com> On Oct 20, 2004, at 2:14 AM, Terry Watson wrote: > --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Terry Watson" > <terry@tcwatson.com> > > Thanks, Brian. What I referred to as a keypad is actually a remote > location > for the buttons and knobs on the right side of the EFIS screen. Oh, that keypad. > I put them > on the left right above the throttle so I can completely control the > EFIS > with my left hand and won't have to let go of the stick in my right > hand. I > really like the way the combination of four buttons and two concentric > rotating knobs control everything. The keyBOARD won't be on board > unless > it's a cross country, and then it will be in the baggage compartment. I retract my comment then. Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza brianl@lloyd.com Suite 201 +1.340.998.9447 St. Thomas, VI 00802 There is a time to laud one's country and a time to protest. A good citizen is prepared to do either as the need arises.


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:13:04 AM PST US
    From: "cgalley" <cgalley@qcbc.org>
    Subject: Re: What's going on ???
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "cgalley" <cgalley@qcbc.org> Does the single light have full brightness or is it kind of reddish? Have you checked the landing light ground? It could be bad. Cy Galley - Chair, AirVenture Emergency Aircraft Repair A Service Project of Chapter 75 EAA Safety Programs Editor - TC EAA Sport Pilot ----- Original Message ----- From: "George Braly" <gwbraly@gami.com> Subject: AeroElectric-List: What's going on ??? > --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "George Braly" <gwbraly@gami.com> > > > We have a Bonanza with a peculiar electrical load issue. > > With everything electric ON - - pitot heat, nav, rotating beacon, radios, AND one (and only one) of two landing lights - - the 14V system charges just fine on the ground at about 1500 RPM, maintaining a full 14.x volts. > > Do the same thing with everything OFF, except the landing light - - and NOW - - add the second landing light, and the entire system discharges hard at the same 1500 RPM, down to a buss voltage of about 12.5. > > It doesn't make any difference which of the two landing lights you use, in either order, for the test. > > I am having a hard time understanding that one landing light is a much bigger load than the rest of the entire aircraft systems (including the pitot). > > It appears that there is some kind of short developing when both landing light switches are ON, rather than either one ON, by itself. > > Any thoughts or ideas? > > > --- > >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:19:02 AM PST US
    From: Ken <klehman@albedo.net>
    Subject: Re: Rumination: Automatic standby fuel pump?
    clamav-milter version 0.80c on juliet.albedo.net --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Ken <klehman@albedo.net> This mechanical solution may not the best idea. I am aware of some failed attempts to do that with efi pumps but vapour bubbles tend to form as the pressure drops across the relief valve and many pumps don't work well with bubbles in the inlet. If going this route it is usually necessary to return the fuel to a header tank or the main fuel tank. OTOH it might be adequate with a carbuerator pressures and avgas but I'd still be cautious. Some cars did something similar to control vapour lock but they also routed the return fuel back to the tank on the ones that I owned. Ken Brian Lloyd wrote: >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brianl@lloyd.com> > >On Oct 19, 2004, at 8:45 PM, Richard Riley wrote: > > > >>Now, one problem is that the electric pump makes higher pressure than >>the >>mechanical pump, so I'd have to do some kind of electronic or >>mechanical >>latch, to keep the pump on, rather than having it cycle on and off >>every >>couple of seconds. >> >>Any thoughts? >> >> > >This is a problem I would solve mechanically rather than electrically. >I would have an overpressure relief valve that just shunts the fuel >back to the inlet of the most-upstream pump. That would keep the >pressure at the inlet to your fuel metering system (carb, injection >system, whatever) from rising too high. Now you just turn on the boost >pump before take-off and don't worry about it. > >Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza >brianl@lloyd.com Suite 201 >+1.340.998.9447 St. Thomas, VI 00802 > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:08:16 AM PST US
    Subject: Shielded serial cables
    From: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR@wernerco.com>
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR@wernerco.com> Use Blackbox.com and under products is the custom cable wizard, makes it much easier. They will make the cable to your specs, and they are not expensive. -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Terry Watson Subject: AeroElectric-List: Shielded serial cables --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Terry Watson" --> <terry@tcwatson.com> I need to make some short 9 pin serial cables for my Blue Mountain EFIS/one keyboard and keypad, including a Y connector. Is there any reason that cables like these need to be shielded? They will be very close to my nav/com, transponder, and audio panel. Thanks, Terry == direct advertising on the Matronics Forums. == == ==


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:17:08 AM PST US
    From: Scott Bilinski <bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com>
    Subject: Re: CoolSolder
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Scott Bilinski <bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com> For 20 bucks dont expect much......especially battery powered, and 2 AA'a at that. At 06:42 PM 10/19/2004 -0500, you wrote: >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: jerb <ulflyer@verizon.net> > >OK Scott, so how is everyone to take your reply, for $20 don't expect it to >work, or for "only" $20 don't expect much? > > >At 02:29 PM 10/19/04 -0700, you wrote: > >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Scott Bilinski > ><bilinski@kyocera-wireless.com> > > > >$20.....that pretty much answers your question dosent it? On the other hand > >go ahead and buy it and let us know. > > > > > >At 04:46 PM 10/19/2004 -0400, you wrote: > > >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: echristley@nc.rr.com > > > > > >I've been seeing these adds on TV for a battery > > >operated soldering iron. It's supposed to heat up > > >and cool down very quickly and only when you stick > > >solder against the tip. > > > > > >Before I send them my $20+SH, I thought I'd ask if > > >anyone has tried one of these? > > > > > > > > > > > >Scott Bilinski > >Eng dept 305 > >Phone (858) 657-2536 > >Pager (858) 502-5190 > > > > > > Scott Bilinski Eng dept 305 Phone (858) 657-2536 Pager (858) 502-5190


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:23:34 AM PST US
    Subject: Rumination: Automatic standby fuel pump?
    From: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR@wernerco.com>
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR@wernerco.com> Rich Eggenfellner has dual electric pumps that do this same thing for the FWF package, it is layed out in the install manual, you can download it off of his site http://www.eggenfellneraircraft.com/ use the install link to find it. Gary Newstead designed it and it works well for them -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Richard Riley Subject: AeroElectric-List: Rumination: Automatic standby fuel pump? --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Richard Riley --> <richard@riley.net> I've now seen 2 small airplanes destroyed by engine driven fuel pumps that failed - one on take off, one on landing - and pilots who didn't get the backup electrical fuel pump on quickly enough for a re-start. Yes, they probably should have just had them on for takeoff and landing, but that wasn't the case. I'm thinking of wiring my fuel pump with a SPDT switch. Up would be ON, down would be AUTO. There'd be a pair of pressure switches - one sensing oil pressure, the other fuel pressure. If the swich was in auto, there was oil pressure, and fuel pressure fell below a pre-set limit, the pump would turn on. Now, one problem is that the electric pump makes higher pressure than the mechanical pump, so I'd have to do some kind of electronic or mechanical latch, to keep the pump on, rather than having it cycle on and off every couple of seconds. Any thoughts? == direct advertising on the Matronics Forums. == == ==


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:00:39 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <b.nuckolls@cox.net>
    Subject: Shielded serial cables
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <b.nuckolls@cox.net> At 09:03 AM 10/20/2004 -0400, you wrote: >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Lloyd, Daniel R." ><LloydDR@wernerco.com> > >Use Blackbox.com and under products is the custom cable wizard, makes it >much easier. They will make the cable to your specs, and they are not >expensive. > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com >[mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Terry >Watson >To: aeroelectric-list@matronics.com >Subject: AeroElectric-List: Shielded serial cables > >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Terry Watson" >--> <terry@tcwatson.com> > >I need to make some short 9 pin serial cables for my Blue Mountain >EFIS/one keyboard and keypad, including a Y connector. Is there any >reason that cables like these need to be shielded? They will be very >close to my nav/com, transponder, and audio panel. Probably not but if they turn out to radiate some noise into an adjacent system, they're easy to re-make with shielded wire. I use shielded wire routinely for such cables simply because you get all the wires you need for the task bundled up into a single assembly. We stock shielded pairs and trios by the thousands of feet. Using shielded wire is easier and doesn't hurt anything . . . I'd go for shielded. Bob . . . ---


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:08:45 AM PST US
    Subject: Shielded serial cables
    From: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR@wernerco.com>
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Lloyd, Daniel R." <LloydDR@wernerco.com> Terry I work in a manufacturing environment where space is limited and we have roll up keyboards for easy storage, if you would like the info email me direct -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Terry Watson Subject: RE: AeroElectric-List: Shielded serial cables --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Terry Watson" --> <terry@tcwatson.com> Thanks, Brian. What I referred to as a keypad is actually a remote location for the buttons and knobs on the right side of the EFIS screen. I put them on the left right above the throttle so I can completely control the EFIS with my left hand and won't have to let go of the stick in my right hand. I really like the way the combination of four buttons and two concentric rotating knobs control everything. The keyBOARD won't be on board unless it's a cross country, and then it will be in the baggage compartment. Terry RV-8A, BMA EFIS/one -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Brian Lloyd Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Shielded serial cables > AeroElectric-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brianl@lloyd.com> On Oct 19, 2004, at 6:24 PM, Terry Watson wrote: > --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Terry Watson" > <terry@tcwatson.com> > > I need to make some short 9 pin serial cables for my Blue Mountain > EFIS/one keyboard and keypad, including a Y connector. Is there any > reason that cables like these need to be shielded? They will be very > close to my nav/com, transponder, and audio panel. For RS-232, it shouldn't make any difference. And when are you going to use a keypad in flight? That strikes me as pretty tough to use while flying your airplane. Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza brianl@lloyd.com Suite 201 +1.340.998.9447 St. Thomas, VI 00802 == direct advertising on the Matronics Forums. == == ==


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:44:47 AM PST US
    From: SportAV8R@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Report on auto HID lights for aircraft
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: SportAV8R@aol.com There was some discussion of these lights before, and IIRC, someone pointed out that the color temperature of the HID lights so closely matched that of the daytime sky that they were less visible that the yellowish tungsten and halogen lamps now in common use. Just a potential downside to think about. Oh, yeah, and the post about the WW2 bombers that used rheostat-adjustable lights in their leading edges and nose to blend with the daytime sky - probably more of the same idea. Looks like we need HID for best light output in a night landing situation, and tungsten bulbs on a wig-wag for staying out of each other's way in the daytime. Bummer. -BB


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:55:00 AM PST US
    From: "Gary Casey" <glcasey@adelphia.net>
    Subject: Re: Rumination: Automatic standby fuel pump?
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Gary Casey" <glcasey@adelphia.net> from Richard Riley: <<I'm thinking of wiring my fuel pump with a SPDT switch. Up would be ON, down would be AUTO. There'd be a pair of pressure switches - one sensing oil pressure, the other fuel pressure. If the switch was in auto, there was oil pressure, and fuel pressure fell below a pre-set limit, the pump would turn on. Now, one problem is that the electric pump makes higher pressure than the mechanical pump, so I'd have to do some kind of electronic or mechanical latch, to keep the pump on.>> That's precisely what I'm putting in my ES. There will be a off-auto-on switch and in the auto mode a fuel pressure switch will turn on a latching relay that will keep the pump on. Idea is that before engine start you turn it to "auto" and the pump should come on and stay on - that tests the latching relay. Then before take-off turn it to auto and it will take care of itself. There is also a fuel pump light so that you can tell if the fuel pump turned on during flight. And I'm doing it for exactly the reasons you stated. Gary Casey


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:01:05 AM PST US
    From: Carlos Sa <carlosfsa@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Report on auto HID lights for aircraft
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Carlos Sa <carlosfsa@yahoo.com> I believe you cannot "wig-wag" HIDs... ? Carlos do not archive --- SportAV8R@aol.com wrote: > --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: SportAV8R@aol.com ... > Looks like we need HID for best light output in a night landing situation, and tungsten bulbs on > a wig-wag for staying out of each other's way in the daytime. Bummer. > > -BB


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:01:04 AM PST US
    From: Richard Riley <richard@RILEY.NET> pump?
    Subject: Re: Rumination: Automatic standby fuel
    pump? --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Richard Riley <richard@riley.net> pump? If it's a mechanically latching relay, and you turn your switch to "off" after it's been energized, won't it stay on? At 07:43 AM 10/20/04, you wrote: >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Gary Casey" <glcasey@adelphia.net> > >That's precisely what I'm putting in my ES. There will be a off-auto-on >switch and in the auto mode a fuel pressure switch will turn on a latching >relay that will keep the pump on. Idea is that before engine start you turn >it to "auto" and the pump should come on and stay on - that tests the >latching relay. Then before take-off turn it to auto and it will take care >of itself. There is also a fuel pump light so that you can tell if the fuel >pump turned on during flight. And I'm doing it for exactly the reasons you >stated. > >Gary Casey > >


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:01:52 AM PST US
    From: Richard Riley <richard@RILEY.NET> aircraft
    Subject: Re: Report on auto HID lights for
    aircraft --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Richard Riley <richard@riley.net> aircraft Correct. They take several seconds to turn on. You could do it with LCD shutters. But that would be a touch silly. At 07:57 AM 10/20/04, you wrote: >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Carlos Sa <carlosfsa@yahoo.com> > >I believe you cannot "wig-wag" HIDs... ?


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:58:33 AM PST US
    From: "The Minearts" <smineart@kdsi.net>
    Subject: automatic standby fuel pump
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "The Minearts" <smineart@kdsi.net> William Wynne (flycorvair.com) recently posted info on a dual-electric, automatically switched fuel pump system which sounds like what was brought up on the list 10/19. He has been flying with it in his Zodiac and recommends it for the firewall-forward installation of the Corvair conversion. Steve M., CH-601under construction


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:25:56 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <bob.nuckolls@cox.net>
    Subject: Flap Motor Wiring
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <bob.nuckolls@cox.net> >Bob, >Looking at your Schematic for flap system, suppose there are switches for >the front seater and the back seater, and the front seater is trying to >lower the flaps and the back seater accidently or otherwise hits the >"flaps up" switch (the flaps extend relay and the flaps retract relay are >both actuated at the same time). It appears, according to the schematic, >that the hot side of the buss will go to both sides of the flap >motor. What are the consequences of this occurring? Will it damage the >flap motor? Blow the flap motor fuse? > >Thanks. If you study any of the drawings I do on permanent magnet motor controls, you will see that with the system in a de-energized state (no pilot commands in progress) both direction relays are relaxed and the motor has a dead short across it. The short is part of dynamic breaking that takes advantage of a motor's counter-emf generated during spin-down . . . if you load this energy source with the short, the motor stops much faster. If either direction control relay is energized, one side of the motor gets (+) power applied while the other one remains at ground . . . the motor will run. If the opposite relay is energized, then power to the motor reverses polarity and it runs in the opposite direction. If the front and rear stick switches are simultaneously actuated for opposite directions, then both motor relays are energized. In this case, BOTH motor leads are elevated to (+) power which means no power is taken from the ship's DC power system, the motor has a dead short across it and it comes to a stop just as surely as when the two relays are de-energized. When one of the pilots releases the switch, the motor will run in the direction commanded by the switch still closed. This design insures that conflicting commands are ignored and no motion takes place until a single, unambiguous command is presented. Bob . . . ----------------------------------------- ( Experience and common sense cannot be ) ( replaced with policy and procedures. ) ( R. L. Nuckolls III ) -----------------------------------------


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:04:52 PM PST US
    From: Frankhsmit@wmconnect.com
    Subject: Automatic standby fuel pump
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Frankhsmit@wmconnect.com I have a RV-4 that has an IO360. The electric fuel pump will increase the pressure 2 or 3 psi, over the engine pump 15 psi when I turn it on for landing or takeoff. It has absolutely no affect on anything other than perhaps a slight increase in fuel flow, maybe from 8.0 gph to 8.1 gph. IMHO hook it up, turn it on and don't worry about it. Don't make it more complicated than needed. FWIW Frank


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:50:19 PM PST US
    From: "Scott Jackson" <jayeandscott@telus.net>
    Subject: Re: CoolSolder
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Scott Jackson" <jayeandscott@telus.net> My local avionics guy uses a soldering iron that runs off time-expired ELT battery packs. Appears to work great, and without any longer a heating time required, either. Scott in VAncouver ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <b.nuckolls@cox.net> Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: CoolSolder > --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" > <b.nuckolls@cox.net> > > At 04:23 PM 10/19/2004 -0700, you wrote: > >>--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "David Burton" >><dburton@nwlink.com> >> >>I really wanted this thing to work. It runs on AA's instead of the >>expensive rechargeable batteries that my (relatively expensive) portable >>soldering iron uses. I've tried using it and found it to be worthless. >>There may be an application that it will work for, but that's not good >>enough. It needs to be able to solder all of my jobs, not the occasional >>one. >>The way it works is to short circuit the 4 AA batteries it uses between >>the >>two part tip. The wire or whatever you are trying to solder completes the >>short circuit. In my experience it does not work. The degree of >>precision >>that the tip must be placed and held for it to work is beyond ridiculous. >>Save your money and buy an Isotip rechargeable if you need a portable >>iron. >>I use the large tip for most of what I do. It's not large compared to an >>electric soldering iron. The tiny tip is great for really small wires but >>doesn't hold the heat well enough for larger wires. > > Aha! I've seen that ad on TV too and was wondering about the technology > involved. Your description has saved me from having to buy one myself. > > The technology you're describing has been around in some form or another > for over a century and is called "resistance soldering". I've never > found > it attractive for my own work but I've known a number of technicians > who swear by it. I've used it to play with but find temperature > controlled > irons much simpler to use. Some examples of the tools can be seen at: > > http://www.ares-server.com/Ares/Ares.asp?MerchantID=RET01229&Action=Catalog&Type=Department&ID=81 > > http://www.torontosurplus.com/redirect.php?middleframe=http://www.torontosurplus.com/ind/ind40.htm > > http://www.micromark.com/html_pages/instructions/80417Ai/american_beauty.html > > > For my money, the premier soldering tools are made by METCAL. Go > to Ebay and searche on 'metcal'. You'll get about 100 hits > on solder stations, handles, tips and complete systems. I buy > the older PS2E power supplies separate. Folks don't seem to covet > the antique stations as much and when they don't come with handles > and tips, the prices don't get out of whack. I've picked up > several power supplies for under $150 and I usually just buy > new handles and tips from the electronics suppliers. I'll have > a really good solder station for under $250. But set your price > limit and bit those ebay systems. You'll probably get one > eventually and you can't find a finer soldering tool for the > money anywhere else. > > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=57012&item=3846728177&rd=1 > > Here's one that will probably go for under $150 > > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=1504&item=3846698506&rd=1 > > Here's a real clean one that I'd go up to $250 on. > > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=46413&item=4331721307&rd=1 > > Bob . . . > > > --- > > >


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:13:47 PM PST US
    From: mike_tailwind@att.net
    Subject: Copper foil antenna question
    0.01 RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE Received: by and from look like IP addresses --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: mike_tailwind@att.net I'm installing a copper foil Nav antenna in the wooden wing of my Tailwind project. I am placing the foil on the bottom skin. Each leg of the antenna has to go over two 1/4" thick x 1/2" wide cap strips. Because of this the linear length of the antenna leg is shortened about 1". What is teh effective lenght with these "joggles in teh foil? I was planning on 22.8" legs. Do I make them longer? Thanks, Mike Wilson


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:11:15 PM PST US
    From: "Jim Stone" <jsto1@tampabay.rr.com>
    Subject: Response to Copper foil antenna question
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Jim Stone" <jsto1@tampabay.rr.com> Mike, You do not want to change the length, since that is how the resonant frequency is set for the antenna. There may be a slight change is the reception sensitivity plot but it is minor compared to the potential shift in the frequency bandwidth. Jim Stone




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --