Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 12:25 AM - Voice annunciation. (Rob W M Shipley)
2. 03:43 AM - Re: Re: 02/07/05 A Forced Landing (Chuck Jensen)
3. 04:22 AM - Re: Voice annunciation. (Ken)
4. 08:38 AM - Re: Voice annunciation. (Dan Checkoway)
5. 08:49 AM - Two trim switches (Charlie Burton)
6. 09:36 AM - Re: Two trim switches (Gerry Holland)
7. 11:14 AM - Re: Voice annunciation. (Tony Babb)
8. 11:32 AM - Re: Voice annunciation. (Mickey Coggins)
9. 02:09 PM - Re: Corbalis' Buzzer (Leo J. Corbalis)
10. 04:45 PM - Re: Fuseable Link question (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
11. 05:29 PM - Re: Fuseable Link question (rv-9a-online)
12. 08:04 PM - Re: 2-10 switched fuel pump (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
13. 08:05 PM - Re: Audio isolation amp board (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
14. 10:22 PM - Re: 2-10 switched fuel pump (TimRhod@aol.com)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Voice annunciation. |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Rob W M Shipley" <rob@robsglass.com>
" Actually there are a number of aircraft and other vehicles where
voice annunciation is found appropriate . . . you'd want a VERY
distinct voice so that it doesn't go unnoticed amongst the chatter
on approach control. Hmmm . . . how about Jerry Lewis? Shucks, I've
got one of those stand-out voices. I'll record your phrases for
you at no charge!
Bob . . ."
Now if you wanted a nice cultured(!) English accent you could always give me a
call .................
Rob (the ex pat)
Rob W M Shipley
N919RV (res) Fuselage .....still!
La Mesa, CA. (next to San Diego)
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 02/07/05 A Forced Landing |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Chuck Jensen" <cjensen@dts9000.com>
I don't know if the story is true, but it should be. That's a good one.
Do Not Archive
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Tom
Brusehaver
Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Re: 02/07/05 A Forced Landing
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Tom Brusehaver" <cozytom@mn.rr.com>
I was originally thinking, yea, blinking lights might be more
of a problem than help, could be the FAA folks were thinking.
Then I went to work, started reading the spec's for some new
FAA software I am working on, and holy cow! talk about blinking.
It is their CHI (Computer Human Interface) spec, and they
got all kinds of stuff blinking, and at different rates! You
do a hand off from your sector to another sector, it blinks
the datablock at one rate. A flight is transitioning your sector
to an airport to land, but is controlled by another controller, the
datablock blinks at another rate. It seems everything has a
possible different rate (configurable software).
Then thinking about audio alerts. We had a controller tell us
about a cessna 337 that landed gear up a couple years ago. The
controller called 'em several times on the radio, "your gear
is up, go around". After they ground to a stop, the controller
got a chance to talk to the pilot, "didn't you hear me tell
you your gear is up?". "We couldn't hear nothing, there was
a loud buzzer going off".
> --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Ken <klehman@albedo.net>
>
> Sounds like silly FAA deskjockey talk to me! I agree that status
> indicators should not flash but warning and caution lights?
> Surely nobody ignores a flashing light until explaining it. Removing a
> faulted flickering light bulb on extremely rare occasion is trivial.
> Flickering is not likely to be confused with flashing anyway. A
> light that isn't noticed is useless.
> Ken
>
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Voice annunciation. |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Ken <klehman@albedo.net>
Sorry guys but I also recall reading studies that proved that male
pilots are much more likely to notice and respond to certain female
voices compared to male voice warnings.... ;)
Ken
Rob W M Shipley wrote:
>--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Rob W M Shipley" <rob@robsglass.com>
>
>
> " Actually there are a number of aircraft and other vehicles where
> voice annunciation is found appropriate . . . you'd want a VERY
> distinct voice so that it doesn't go unnoticed amongst the chatter
> on approach control. Hmmm . . . how about Jerry Lewis? Shucks, I've
> got one of those stand-out voices. I'll record your phrases for
> you at no charge!
> Bob . . ."
>
>Now if you wanted a nice cultured(!) English accent you could always give me a
call .................
>Rob (the ex pat)
>Rob W M Shipley
>N919RV (res) Fuselage .....still!
>La Mesa, CA. (next to San Diego)
>
>
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Voice annunciation. |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Dan Checkoway" <dan@rvproject.com>
The ACS2002 and AF-2500 have a female voice for aural warnings.
http://www.advanced-control-systems.com
It definitely gets your attention! This thing kicks butt.
)_( Dan
RV-7 N714D
http://www.rvproject.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken" <klehman@albedo.net>
Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Voice annunciation.
> --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Ken <klehman@albedo.net>
>
> Sorry guys but I also recall reading studies that proved that male
> pilots are much more likely to notice and respond to certain female
> voices compared to male voice warnings.... ;)
> Ken
>
>
> Rob W M Shipley wrote:
>
> >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Rob W M Shipley"
<rob@robsglass.com>
> >
> >
> > " Actually there are a number of aircraft and other vehicles where
> > voice annunciation is found appropriate . . . you'd want a VERY
> > distinct voice so that it doesn't go unnoticed amongst the chatter
> > on approach control. Hmmm . . . how about Jerry Lewis? Shucks, I've
> > got one of those stand-out voices. I'll record your phrases for
> > you at no charge!
> > Bob . . ."
> >
> >Now if you wanted a nice cultured(!) English accent you could always give
me a call .................
> >Rob (the ex pat)
> >Rob W M Shipley
> >N919RV (res) Fuselage .....still!
> >La Mesa, CA. (next to San Diego)
> >
> >
>
>
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Two trim switches |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Charlie Burton" <notrubce@hotmail.com>
I'm converting a single panel mounted Ray Allen trim switch to two stick mounted
hat switches. I realize I need a relay deck to convert the SPST stick switches
to DPDT but do I need to install two relay decks, one for each stick switch,
or can I simply joint the wires from each switch together before they connect
to the relay deck?
Charlie Burton
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Two trim switches |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Gerry Holland <gnholland@onetel.com>
Charlie Hi
> I'm converting a single panel mounted Ray Allen trim switch to two stick
> mounted hat switches.
Matt who hosts this List has a neat device call a Governor' that does what
you want on his Matronics Website:
http://www.matronics.com/governor/index.htm
I have fitted one with a Panel TRIM Sx for back up and to Coolie Hats on
Control sticks. It's fine.
Regards
Gerry
Europa 384 G-FIZY
Trigear with Rotax 912 and Arplast CS Prop.
Dynon EFIS, KMD 150, Icom A-200 and SL70 Transponder.
PSS AoA Fitted.
http://www.g-fizy.com
Mobile: +44 7808 402404
WebFax: +44 870 7059985
gnholland@onetel.com
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Voice annunciation. |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Tony Babb" <tonybabb@alejandra.net>
I respond well to my wife's voice - many years of training.....
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken" <klehman@albedo.net>
Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Voice annunciation.
> --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Ken <klehman@albedo.net>
>
> Sorry guys but I also recall reading studies that proved that male
> pilots are much more likely to notice and respond to certain female
> voices compared to male voice warnings.... ;)
> Ken
>
>
> Rob W M Shipley wrote:
>
> >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Rob W M Shipley"
<rob@robsglass.com>
> >
> >
> > " Actually there are a number of aircraft and other vehicles where
> > voice annunciation is found appropriate . . . you'd want a VERY
> > distinct voice so that it doesn't go unnoticed amongst the chatter
> > on approach control. Hmmm . . . how about Jerry Lewis? Shucks, I've
> > got one of those stand-out voices. I'll record your phrases for
> > you at no charge!
> > Bob . . ."
> >
> >Now if you wanted a nice cultured(!) English accent you could always give
me a call .................
> >Rob (the ex pat)
> >Rob W M Shipley
> >N919RV (res) Fuselage .....still!
> >La Mesa, CA. (next to San Diego)
> >
> >
>
>
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Voice annunciation. |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Mickey Coggins <mick-matronics@rv8.ch>
On recent flight I was in an exit row, and the flight attendant
started her little orientation to us by saying they have a rule
that any men in the exit row must be married, because we are
used to taking orders from women.
Mickey
Tony Babb wrote:
> --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Tony Babb" <tonybabb@alejandra.net>
>
> I respond well to my wife's voice - many years of training.....
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken" <klehman@albedo.net>
> To: <aeroelectric-list@matronics.com>
> Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List: Voice annunciation.
>
>
>
>>--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Ken <klehman@albedo.net>
>>
>>Sorry guys but I also recall reading studies that proved that male
>>pilots are much more likely to notice and respond to certain female
>>voices compared to male voice warnings.... ;)
>>Ken
>>
--
Mickey Coggins
http://www.rv8.ch/
#82007 Wiring
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Corbalis' Buzzer |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Leo J. Corbalis" <leocorbalis@sbcglobal.net>
Yes. Its a stupid buzzer. If the light comes on the buzzer comes on too. I
turn the master ON - yell CLEAR - and turn the key to start. The EIS takes a
few seconds to boot up so no beep. I also have an "ice cube" relay in
paralell with the starter solonoid which disconnects all the electronics for
protection during the start. NC contacts rated at 40 amps. which restarts
the EIS at switch release. Its only a couple of seconds and then the EIS
senses 20 psi. oil pr. and stops or never starts the light and beep. Then I
turn ON the radios.
Works great
Leo Corbalis
----- Original Message -----
From: <Speedy11@aol.com>
Subject: AeroElectric-List: Corbalis' Buzzer
> --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Speedy11@aol.com
>
> Leo,
> Sounds like a good design you have. Do you have a means to mute the
buzzer
> once it has your attention? Does it start buzzing when you apply
electrical
> power and stop once you get the engine running?
> Stan Sutterfield
> Tampa
> www.rv-8a.net
>
> In a message dated 2/18/2005 2:57:36 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> aeroelectric-list-digest@matronics.com writes:
> When I built my Zodiac 601 HDS I put in a GRT engine monitor. The blinking
> light from no oil pressure was supposed to remind me turn off the battery
> switch. After the second flight, parked facing the late afternoon sun on
the
> ramp, I missed the light and ran the battery totally flat. I put a simple
2
> 1/2 or 3 inch Radio Shack buzzer in paralell with the light. The light has
a
> blinker circuit so just get a simple steady tone one. The buzzer is stuck
to
> the back side of the panel with 3M double sided foam tape. Its been there
7
> years.
> The buzzer is loud enough to hear clearly at full power thru my Peltor
7000
> passive headset. The tone is probably higher than the ANR headsets try to
> cancel.
>
>
Message 10
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Fuseable Link question |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <b.nuckolls@cox.net>
At 08:20 PM 2/18/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Charlie Kuss <chaztuna@adelphia.net>
>
>Bob & Listers,
> If I understand Bob's book correctly, Bob feels that any bus supply wire
>which is 6" long or less, does not need circuit protection. I can not get
>my main bus power supply wire that short (minimum bend radius and
>obstruction considerations).
First, know that the "6-inch rule" is a hand-me-down from
the darkest ages of electrical systems installations in airplanes.
I recall statements at Cessna in 1964 that short wires tied to
the bus behind the breaker panel did not need to be protected
because they were less than 6" in length.
Now, where did that number come from? The folks who thought it
up are probably dead. Was there some careful consideration of
the amount of smoke one could expect from then popular nylon
over PVC wire? Hmmm . . . if tefzel smoke is more/less, unpleasant/
hazardous then perhaps the rule of thumb should be 4 inches/10 inches.
I'll bet we could get them to debate this for at least a couple of
years before generating a new rule.
> My main power supply circuit will go through a LittelFuse, 60 amp maxi
>fuse and holder. However, I must run a 6AWG wire about 9" to reach this
>fuse holder. Should I make a 10AWG fuseable link? This wire will be in free
>air. It will be the supply line to both my main bus power and to the
>alternator B lead. Or should I simply run 6 AWG wire to the fuse holder
>without concern for a possible short in this 9" supply wire? If I use a 10
>AWG wire (fuseable link), I can reduce this distance from 9" to 7". Since
>this is the supply wire for my main bus, I'm concerned about voltage drop
>here. Am I making mountains out of mole hills? How much of a
>voltage/efficiency loss would be taken by installing the fuseible link?
Run a solid piece of wire for whatever length it takes to do the
job neatly and with good craftsmanship.
Bob . . .
Message 11
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Fuseable Link question |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: rv-9a-online <rv-9a-online@telus.net>
Good advice. At some point, you can't protect everything. The
probability of a wiring short is proportional to the number of
connections it makes, the number of corners it turns, the number of
adjacent wires in the bundle, and the vibration it is susceptible to.
I don't think length matters in this equation.
Murphy will get you, though... at some point you'll drop a wrench across
two terminals. I did this on a 200V battery pack for an electic
vehicle. It's a good way to cut steel and burst your eardrums in one
move.
Vern Little, RV-9A
Robert L. Nuckolls, III wrote:
>--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <b.nuckolls@cox.net>
>
>At 08:20 PM 2/18/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>
>
>
>>--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Charlie Kuss <chaztuna@adelphia.net>
>>
>>Bob & Listers,
>> If I understand Bob's book correctly, Bob feels that any bus supply wire
>>which is 6" long or less, does not need circuit protection. I can not get
>>my main bus power supply wire that short (minimum bend radius and
>>obstruction considerations).
>>
>>
>
> First, know that the "6-inch rule" is a hand-me-down from
> the darkest ages of electrical systems installations in airplanes.
> I recall statements at Cessna in 1964 that short wires tied to
> the bus behind the breaker panel did not need to be protected
> because they were less than 6" in length.
>
> Now, where did that number come from? The folks who thought it
> up are probably dead. Was there some careful consideration of
> the amount of smoke one could expect from then popular nylon
> over PVC wire? Hmmm . . . if tefzel smoke is more/less, unpleasant/
> hazardous then perhaps the rule of thumb should be 4 inches/10 inches.
> I'll bet we could get them to debate this for at least a couple of
> years before generating a new rule.
>
>
>
>> My main power supply circuit will go through a LittelFuse, 60 amp maxi
>>fuse and holder. However, I must run a 6AWG wire about 9" to reach this
>>fuse holder. Should I make a 10AWG fuseable link? This wire will be in free
>>air. It will be the supply line to both my main bus power and to the
>>alternator B lead. Or should I simply run 6 AWG wire to the fuse holder
>>without concern for a possible short in this 9" supply wire? If I use a 10
>>AWG wire (fuseable link), I can reduce this distance from 9" to 7". Since
>>this is the supply wire for my main bus, I'm concerned about voltage drop
>>here. Am I making mountains out of mole hills? How much of a
>>voltage/efficiency loss would be taken by installing the fuseible link?
>>
>>
>
>
> Run a solid piece of wire for whatever length it takes to do the
> job neatly and with good craftsmanship.
>
> Bob . . .
>
>
>
>
Message 12
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 2-10 switched fuel pump |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <b.nuckolls@cox.net>
At 07:42 PM 2/18/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: TimRhod@aol.com
>
>Hi Bob I was reading in past articles that you recommended a 2-10 switch
>for wiring a dukes fuel pump in the configuration of off- low- high. I have
>the switch and in trying to figure it out the only way I can see to get high
>is to also have low on at the same time. Is this correct? Any harm to the
>pump to power both high and low wires together? Thanks Tim
If this is the pump I'm thinking of, the hi/lo power wires are taps
on a series wound motor. Tying them both together would get you
high speed and powering just the low speed wire would get you
low speed. The wiring for a 2-10 switch to power one wire at a time
is posted at:
http://www.aeroelectric.com/Pictures/2-10_Hi-Lo_Boost.pdf
Bob . . .
Message 13
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Audio isolation amp board |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <b.nuckolls@cox.net>
At 09:22 AM 2/17/2005 -0800, you wrote:
>--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Dee L. Conger" <dee@ansatainc.com>
>
>Bob - is the circuit board for your isolation amp available? If so,
>where?
>
Yes. See
http://aeroelectric.com/Catalog/AECcatalog.html
Bob . . .
Message 14
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 2-10 switched fuel pump |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: TimRhod@aol.com
In a message dated 2/19/2005 11:05:18 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
b.nuckolls@cox.net writes:
http://www.aeroelectric.com/Pictures/2-10_Hi-Lo_Boost.pdf
Bob I think that drawing may be incorrect Should not #5 be jumped to #1
instead of #3.
While I have you how would you wire a pump on light to show pump on in both
high and low configurations. One Light on with either high or low? Thanks
Tim
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|