AeroElectric-List Digest Archive

Mon 05/09/05


Total Messages Posted: 21



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 03:23 AM - Old Bose Headsets Cutting Out ()
     2. 04:06 AM - Re: Radio Noise Redux (William Yamokoski)
     3. 05:22 AM - Re: OV damage to avionics: Dynon, Icom, Collins (Ken)
     4. 06:19 AM - Re: Old Bose Headsets Cutting Out (BobsV35B@aol.com)
     5. 06:27 AM - Re: Old Bose Headsets Cutting Out (BobsV35B@aol.com)
     6. 06:37 AM - Re: Radio Noise Redux (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     7. 06:40 AM - Re: Airmaster AC200 manual switch? (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
     8. 06:50 AM - Re: radio noise redux (colyncase on earthlink)
     9. 07:19 AM - Re: OV damage to avionics: Dynon, Icom, (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    10. 07:26 AM - Re: Radio Noise Redux (John Schroeder)
    11. 07:47 AM - Re: OV damage to avionics: Dynon, Icom, Collins (Eric M. Jones)
    12. 09:10 AM - Save some cable ... maybe (Jerry Grimmonpre)
    13. 09:20 AM - Re: Old Bose Headsets Cutting Out (Leo Corbalis)
    14. 11:30 AM - Flap root extension (Fergus Kyle)
    15. 11:57 AM - Re: Re: OV damage to avionics: Dynon, Icom, Collins (Mickey Coggins)
    16. 12:19 PM - AW: Flap root extension (Europa (Alfred Buess))
    17. 01:37 PM - Re: Save some cable ... maybe (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
    18. 02:01 PM - Re: Flap root extension (Gerry Holland)
    19. 02:31 PM - Re: Flap root extension (David Glauser)
    20. 05:33 PM - Z-28 (Giffen A Marr)
    21. 09:55 PM - Re: Re: OV damage to avionics: Dynon, Icom, Collins (rwtalbot@purephotos.com.au.by.themail.purephotos.com.au.with.HTTP;Tue; (SquirrelMail authenticated user rwtalbot);,)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:23:04 AM PST US
    From: <psiegel@fuse.net>
    Subject: Old Bose Headsets Cutting Out
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: <psiegel@fuse.net> I have a 1946 Aeronca Champ just out of restoration. I have the older style portable Bose noise-cancelling headsets front and back. (The kind Bose no longer supports other than to take as a trade-in for their new headsets...don't get me started!) They can be powered by 12v-24v. I power them with a portable 10 x 1.2v 2400 mAh nicad pack. I also use this portable nicad pack as power for an A-22 Icom handheld radio which has its own 600 mAh internal nicad pack and a portable Sigtronics 2-person high noise intercom. The intercom also has an internal 9v "transistor radio" style back-up battery. My problem is that after about 10 minutes of flying the noise cancelling feature in the front (noisiest) seat kicks off. When I cycle the on-off switch it just comes back on for a few seconds. I swapped the headsets front and back and the problem persists. I tried different freshly cycled and fully charged nicad pack and the problem persists. I tried to power the front headset only with two 9v "transistor radio" batteries wired in series and the headsets work fine that way? I wonder why the front seat headset doesn't keep working with my shared 10 cell nicad pack? Any suggestions? Anybody know how long the old Bose headset will operate on the two "transistor radio" style batteries? Please be patient with me as I am new to this list! Paul Siegel


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:06:34 AM PST US
    From: "William Yamokoski" <yamokosk@lakemichigancollege.edu>
    Subject: Re: Radio Noise Redux
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "William Yamokoski" <yamokosk@lakemichigancollege.edu> Thanks OC....at this point all suggestions are most welcome. Even more importantly, I think I could install these things without making anything blow up! Thanks again. Bill Yamokoski >>> bakerocb@cox.net 05/08/05 12:06 PM >>> --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: <bakerocb@cox.net> 5/8/2005 Hello William Yamokoski, My sympathies to you with your on going radio problems which started out with a machine gun noise when transmitting (see both previous edited postings below). Maybe my experience will help. I eventually solved my problem by buying some split ferrite beads and installing them in several different arbitrarily selected places in my comm system -- not very scientific. The noise went away. I took a "what ever works" attiude and haven't delved any further into the cause. Good luck. OC 6/16/2004 Hello Brian Lloyd, and Other Willing Experts, I have a vexing problem with the VHF comm portion of my Garmin 430 installed in my KIS TR-1 that I'd like some help with. Here is the fundamental problem scenario: 1) Start engine, talk to ground control (121.8) using Lightspeed headset, pilot's push to talk button, and pilot's headset jacks. Everything works normally so taxi out and make engine run up. 2) Engine run up complete, switch to tower (133.1), try to talk using same arrangement as in 1). The result is a machine gun like sound when I key the transmitter -- impossible to transmit coherently. (Rapid intermittent making and breaking of ground contact for PTT?). Receiver works OK.....skip... 'OC' Baker, Builder of KIS TR-1 #116 4/14/97 - 11/17/03 previously from "William Yamokoski" <yamokosk@lakemichigancollege.edu> Subject: Radio Noise Redux Ok folks, here's the story...Been dealing with noise on transmission from my MicroAir 760. I have the following observations: Only occurs on transmission. Occurs no matter what headset or jacks (pilot/copilot) combination I use. At low rpm, sounds like a machine gun. Add a little rpm , the machine gun gets faster and maybe a little higher pitched. Keep adding rpm and the gun gets too fast to make out individual noises...gets to be a big blur.....skip........Bill Yamokoski, N4970Y


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:22:17 AM PST US
    From: Ken <klehman@albedo.net>
    Subject: Re: OV damage to avionics: Dynon, Icom, Collins
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Ken <klehman@albedo.net> So will a couple of 18volt transorbs after a 5 or 7.5 amp fuse offer any real protection to an icom A200 I wonder? I guess I could set up a test to at least confirm that the fuse pops. Ken gmcjetpilot@yahoo.com wrote: >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: <gmcjetpilot@yahoo.com> > > >What would happen to your avionics if an over voltage occurred? I did not know, so I called and asked. The over voltage would presumably be caused by a runaway alternator or regulator malfunction. The avionics I was most interested in was the: > > >-Dynon D-10 EFIS > >-Icom A200 panel mounted COM > >-Collins (S-Tec) TDR-950 transponder > > >The question: can it handle an over voltage and what damage could take place? > > >**Dynon EFIS D-10: all-in one EFIS unit that incorporates a color "glass" display of all flight instruments. Dynon meets the electronics industry standard, such as DO-160 and can handle input voltage of 10-30V and spikes of 60V for very short period (20ms?). The main electronics are always protected, but if the OV is extreme or duration too long, damage could occur to the unit. However the damage would be limited and repair cost nominal. > > >**Icom A200: digital flip-flop digital Com. They have a statement in the user manual that it must be off during start for protection of circuits. It also states power source over 16V will ruin the transceiver. I got thru to customer support. They were helpful but admitted they had limited technical information, and he was not one of the bench guy. However he was steadfast that the radio must be off during start and the max volts was 15.8 volts. He did not see anything in the circuit schematics that protected the main board from the power source (aircraft power). Therefore he speculates that any over voltage or spike would damage the radio? Obviously disappointed, I may check a little deeper. > > >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:19:11 AM PST US
    From: BobsV35B@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Old Bose Headsets Cutting Out
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: BobsV35B@aol.com In a message dated 5/9/2005 5:24:25 A.M. Central Standard Time, psiegel@fuse.net writes: I wonder why the front seat headset doesn't keep working with my shared 10 cell nicad pack? Any suggestions? Anybody know how long the old Bose headset will operate on the two "transistor radio" style batteries? Please be patient with me as I am new to this list! Paul Siegel Good Morning Paul, The symptoms you report are indicative of a voltage loss. I would check the voltage at the connection to the Bose headsets or within the Bose controller unit. I had a set of those first generation headsets and they worked great all the way until they were traded in on the newer light weight Bose Xs. However, I never did try to use them with a battery pack. Since they will operate on either fourteen or twenty-eight volts, your eighteen volt battery pack may be triggering a low voltage kickout by making the set think it should be getting twenty-eight volts. I have no idea how multiple voltage units work, but I have had problems with such devices when the voltages were between fourteen and twenty eight volts. Happy Skies, Old Bob AKA Bob Siegfried Ancient Aviator Stearman N3977A Brookeridge Airpark LL22 Downers Grove, IL 60516 630 985-8502


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:27:23 AM PST US
    From: BobsV35B@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Old Bose Headsets Cutting Out
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: BobsV35B@aol.com In a message dated 5/9/2005 5:24:25 A.M. Central Standard Time, psiegel@fuse.net writes: I have a 1946 Aeronca Champ just out of restoration. I have the older style portable Bose noise-cancelling headsets front and back. (The kind Bose no longer supports other than to take as a trade-in for their new headsets...don't get me started!) They can be powered by 12v-24v. I power them with a portable 10 x 1.2v 2400 mAh nicad pack. Good Morning Once Again Paul, I guess I goofed on when your problem was occurring. I had it in my mind that you had the problem when hitting the set with eighteen volts. I see it is the other way around. Twelve volts is awfully low for that set. I believe you will have better luck if you be sure your battery pack is up closer to fourteen volts when used with the Bose headsets. Happy Skies, Old Bob AKA Bob Siegfried Ancient Aviator Stearman N3977A Brookeridge Airpark LL22 Downers Grove, IL 60516 630 985-8502


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:37:21 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <b.nuckolls@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: Radio Noise Redux
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <b.nuckolls@cox.net> At 07:04 AM 5/9/2005 -0400, you wrote: >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "William Yamokoski" ><yamokosk@lakemichigancollege.edu> > >Thanks OC....at this point all suggestions are most welcome. Even more >importantly, I think I could install these things without making >anything blow up! Thanks again. >Bill Yamokoski Bill, if running the radio on a separate battery made the noise go away, then a 14v supply filter as suggested earlier is in order. The noise abatement process can be tedious but the technique is always the same. Isolate one potential propagation path and explore its characteristics. All of the ideas/solutions suggested have merit on some level but the vast majority of noise issues involve conducted (+14v input), ground loop (mic/headsets grounded in two or more places) and radiated (noise comes in through antenna). Until you have eliminated all of these as potential solutions, exploring all the long-shots is likely to be fruitless. Each experiment takes about the same amount of time to conduct so I'd make real sure that you've covered the big-dogs first. Bob . . .


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:40:46 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <b.nuckolls@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: Airmaster AC200 manual switch?
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <b.nuckolls@cox.net> At 06:24 PM 5/7/2005 -0400, you wrote: >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Ronald J. Parigoris" ><rparigor@suffolk.lib.ny.us> > >Hello Bob > >I will be using a Airmaster prop on 914UL Rotax. >The Airmaster Hub is called a AP332, it houses the electric motor and >articulation >mechanism while holding Warp drive Blades. You could use the AP332 like >this and just have >an adjustable pitch prop. > >Or you can add the AC200, which is a Constant speed black box controller. >http://www.airmasterpropellers.com/ >Or can try http://www.airmasterpropellers.com/wa.asp?idWebPage=3474 > >I am pretty certain your Schematic will work with just the AP332, if it >were plumbed direct >to the electric motor. > >When using the Constant speed black box controller, I downloaded as much >info as i could, >but it does not give enough detail as to what the switch does, perhaps it >controls the >motor direct somehow, or perhaps it is controlling some sort of circuit in >the AP332 that >is not direct to the motor. I suspect this is the case. The switch currents will be quite low and no boost relays will be necessary. However, it's possible that their switching logic has some hidden caveats . . . I'd recommend you talk to someone at the factory before you begin any non-standard installation. Bob . . .


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:50:36 AM PST US
    From: "colyncase on earthlink" <colyncase@earthlink.net>
    Subject: re: radio noise redux
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "colyncase on earthlink" <colyncase@earthlink.net> I just tuned into this thread so I may be missing some context. But here's one thing to look into. About a year ago I bought some brand new champion spark plug wires and started hearing noise in the headset that did seem to change with the engine rpm. I'll spare you all the blind alleys we went down. In the end, it turned out to be that the crimp to the shielding on the spark plug leads, at the mag end, was not adequately penetrating that cool new red spongy insulation. So I didn't have the shield grounded. Squeezed it through with the pliers a little and problem solved. Colyn Case


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:19:00 AM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <b.nuckolls@cox.net> Collins
    Subject: Re: OV damage to avionics: Dynon, Icom,
    Collins --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <b.nuckolls@cox.net> Collins At 08:21 AM 5/9/2005 -0400, you wrote: >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Ken <klehman@albedo.net> > >So will a couple of 18volt transorbs after a 5 or 7.5 amp fuse offer any >real protection to an icom A200 I wonder? I guess I could set up a test >to at least confirm that the fuse pops. Keep in mind that an OV even is DYNAMIC. It's modeled by a constant current source about 20% larger than alternator rating charging your battery. The rate of voltage rise is not spectacular as long as there's a good battery in the loop. The 18V transorb, when asked to sink a 50A source will clamp at some value well over 20v . . . Now, if there's a battery on line, then it may be that you can expect a fuse upstream of a transorb to open with sufficient speed. I've not seen test data to support this notion so until I can get onto a test stand and do my own measurements, I can't recommend the fuse/transorb approach to transient protection. It's been suggested that observance of operating parameters suggested by DO-160/M-Std-704 are "dated" or some sort of capitulation to outmoded technologies . . . but having lived in this design environment for over 25 years, I can tell you that it's not a simple task to put Band Aids on products not designed to live in this world. It would have been much easier to design transient immunity into the product than to add it later. Bob . . .


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:26:30 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Radio Noise Redux
    From: "John Schroeder" <jschroeder@perigee.net>
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "John Schroeder" <jschroeder@perigee.net> OC - Where did you get these? I'm wondering if the ones they put on computer cables would also work? If I remember correctly, they are also split. Thanks, John On Sun, 8 May 2005 12:06:22 -0400, <bakerocb@cox.net> wrote: > I eventually solved my problem by buying some split ferrite beads and > installing them in several > different arbitrarily selected > places in my comm system -- not very scientific. The noise went > away. --


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:47:23 AM PST US
    From: "Eric M. Jones" <emjones@charter.net>
    Subject: Re: OV damage to avionics: Dynon, Icom, Collins
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Eric M. Jones" <emjones@charter.net> > Subject: AeroElectric-List message posted by: <gmcjetpilot@yahoo.com> ...snip > **Dynon EFIS D-10: all-in one EFIS unit that incorporates a color "glass" display > of all flight instruments. Dynon meets the electronics industry standard, such > as DO-160 and can handle input voltage of 10-30V and spikes of 60V for very > short period (20ms?). The main electronics are always protected, but if the > OV is extreme or duration too long, damage could occur to the unit. However the > damage would be limited and repair cost nominal. It is remarkable that a little input protection can limit damage even from lightning. Typically if a phone-line connected fax machine or modem catches a lightning strike, you often find only a small amount of damage. Modern devices often incorporate a gap in the PCB foil traces meant to arc to ground in the event of a lightning strike. > However he was steadfast that the radio must > be off during start and the max volts was 15.8 volts. He did not see anything > in the circuit schematics that protected the main board from the power source > (aircraft power). Therefore he speculates that any over voltage or spike would > damage the radio? Obviously disappointed, I may check a little deeper. Protecting the radio would cost maybe a buck. You wonder what they were thinking........! > **Collins TDR-950: Collins transponder sold to Meggitt/S-Tec back in the late 90's. > This design goes back a decade or two, and TDR-950s made by S-Tec are the > same as units made by Collins. The TDR-950 does not have real over voltage protection > and could get fully toasted in a worst-case OV scenario. However it does > have some sacrificial components that often fail first, such as a capacitor, > transistor and series relay, saving the main boards. However if it gets past > these first few items, it can extensively damage the transponder. The Gent I > talk to is a real technical "bench guy and seen 14V units connected to 28-32volt > power. He suggest since it draws only 1.2 amps during TX a small 2 amp fuse > would protect it, since the unit will draw more amps with higher voltage, as > he stated it. Since I only have $300 into my TDR-950 I wont worry about it too > much, but may be a 1.5-2 amp fuse might be OK. Therefore if you have a TDR-950 > turn it off for engine start and shutdown. S-Tec stopped producing them several years > ago but still supports them (because Piper makes them). Good value on the used market. Another dollar.......man o' man,,,,,,, ...snip... > ALTERNATORS, INTERNAL VOLTAGE REGULATORS and OV > I asked two large auto electrical overhaul shops about the ND alternators and OV > failures. None seen but the common failure is an OPEN field, ie quite death > but no OV. George, I asked a couple places the same question and got the identical answer-- They said they used to have OV runaways in the distant past...but nobody has seem one in many years. Only "no-output" deaths. ...snip... > (PS check the capability of this IC. Note the application and protections. This > chip is not associated with any specific alternator, just interesting.) > > http://www.freescale.com/files/analog/doc/data_sheet/MC33099FS.pdf George, yes I thought so too. It took me 8 months to get some of these from Digikey and I have some prototype regulators built. Note on the data sheet that in the even of an OV problem the chip shut off a FET...politely disconnecting the field lead. No crowbars here. The helpful East Coast Alternator guy (John Anderika) says that many internally regulated alternators in demanding applications are converted to externally regulated devices...just so you can get to the field lead. Paul Messinger wrote an article for Contact Magazine some years back about a similar conversion. Regards, Eric M. Jones www.PerihelionDesign.com 113 Brentwood Drive Southbridge MA 01550-2705 Phone (508) 764-2072 Email: emjones@charter.net "Competition brings out the best in products and the worst in people." - David Sarnoff


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:10:05 AM PST US
    From: "Jerry Grimmonpre" <jerry@mc.net>
    Subject: Save some cable ... maybe
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Jerry Grimmonpre" <jerry@mc.net> Electric Bob & listers: This idea is offered-up as a possible way to save 3-4 feet of AWG-2 used for the starter/alternator power supply for a Lycoming RV. Strap the starter contactor to the side of the starter. Connect AWG-2 from the hot side of the battery contactor direct to the input side of the starter contactor. From the hot side of the starter contactor, jump over to the alternator B out put with suitable sized AWG. Connect a copper strap from the output of starter contactor to the input of the starter solenoid. Comments ... Thanks and best regards ... Jerry Grimmonpre RV7A building my workshop


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:20:08 AM PST US
    From: "Leo Corbalis" <leocorbalis@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: Old Bose Headsets Cutting Out
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Leo Corbalis" <leocorbalis@sbcglobal.net> Try adding an additional cell in series with the n-c pack. Freshly charged n-c cells put out about 1.4 volts. Measure the voltage when it happens. This is a WAG : the louder noise in the front seat takes more power to cancel and the headsets were designed to work on 14 volts which is normal in a working system. 12 volts is not enough. Pre wire your measurements, One test per flight. Leo Corbalis ----- Original Message ----- From: <psiegel@fuse.net> Subject: AeroElectric-List: Old Bose Headsets Cutting Out > --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: <psiegel@fuse.net> > > I have a 1946 Aeronca Champ just out of restoration. I have the older > style portable Bose noise-cancelling headsets front and back. (The kind > Bose no longer supports other than to take as a trade-in for their new > headsets...don't get me started!) They can be powered by 12v-24v. I > power them with a portable 10 x 1.2v 2400 mAh nicad pack. > > I also use this portable nicad pack as power for an A-22 Icom handheld > radio which has its own 600 mAh internal nicad pack and a portable > Sigtronics 2-person high noise intercom. The intercom also has an > internal 9v "transistor radio" style back-up battery. > > My problem is that after about 10 minutes of flying the noise cancelling > feature in the front (noisiest) seat kicks off. When I cycle the on-off > switch it just comes back on for a few seconds. > > I swapped the headsets front and back and the problem persists. I tried > different freshly cycled and fully charged nicad pack and the problem > persists. I tried to power the front headset only with two 9v "transistor > radio" batteries wired in series and the headsets work fine that way? > > I wonder why the front seat headset doesn't keep working with my shared 10 > cell nicad pack? Any suggestions? Anybody know how long the old Bose > headset will operate on the two "transistor radio" style batteries? > > Please be patient with me as I am new to this list! > > Paul Siegel > > >


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:30:33 AM PST US
    From: "Fergus Kyle" <VE3LVO@rac.ca>
    Subject: Flap root extension
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Fergus Kyle" <VE3LVO@rac.ca> Cheers, This message addresses itself to those who have gone before [really, about everybody] in the construction - specifically the root extension of the flaps to match the fuselage sides: The instructions in my manual actually say to 'fit' the extension foam forms to the root of the flaps. I took this to mean "cut to permit the forms to slide into the root closeout to approximate its original position" as an extension of the foam innards. If this were the case, they would lose about 3/4" of width but would more accurately match the flap itself. it would also mean quite a bit more addition of the forms to reach the fuselage. If you can warp your mind(s) back to that stage, can you remember what you did, and why? I know I should tip to Andy or Nev but presume them to be barely eyeballs above the time demands. Your comments gleefully accepted. Ferg A064 Fuselage and wings out in the back lawn, dodging gulls and dead branches.


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:57:14 AM PST US
    From: Mickey Coggins <mick-matronics@rv8.ch>
    Subject: Re: OV damage to avionics: Dynon, Icom, Collins
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Mickey Coggins <mick-matronics@rv8.ch> > > > Protecting the radio would cost maybe a buck. You wonder what they were > thinking........! > Sounds like another nice product for you, Eric. The Mini-Icom-Whack-OVP-Junior-Flux-Capacitor would be a good name for it! :-) -- Mickey Coggins http://www.rv8.ch/ #82007 Wiring


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:19:45 PM PST US
    From: "Europa (Alfred Buess)" <ykibuess@bluewin.ch>
    Subject: Flap root extension
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Europa (Alfred Buess)" <ykibuess@bluewin.ch> Hi Ferg, I just finished the filling job of my flap root extensions (and the flaps themselves). This allows me to make a comment about the quality of the root extensions of my conventional foam wings and flaps: I had made foam forms, that plugged into the flap roots and made a smooth extension of the flaps. This was achieved by sanding the oversized foam forms to the exact form of the flaps. The layups of bid "thickened" the root area slightly, but this was easily corrected with the filler. After filling you cannot see where the main part of the flap ends and where the root extension begins. Hope this helps a little bit to do that part of the building job. Regards, Alfred Alfred Buess Laenggasse 81, CH-3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland Tel.: +41 (0)31 911 63 32, Fax: +41 (0)31 911 56 32 E-Mail: ykibuess@bluewin.ch Europa XS #097, Monowheel, Foam shortwing, Rotax 912S, Airmaster 332 CS -----Ursprngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] Im Auftrag von Fergus Kyle Gesendet: Montag, 9. Mai 2005 19:32 An: aeroelectric-list@matronics.com Betreff: AeroElectric-List: Flap root extension --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Fergus Kyle" <VE3LVO@rac.ca> Cheers, This message addresses itself to those who have gone before [really, about everybody] in the construction - specifically the root extension of the flaps to match the fuselage sides: The instructions in my manual actually say to 'fit' the extension foam forms to the root of the flaps. I took this to mean "cut to permit the forms to slide into the root closeout to approximate its original position" as an extension of the foam innards. If this were the case, they would lose about 3/4" of width but would more accurately match the flap itself. it would also mean quite a bit more addition of the forms to reach the fuselage. If you can warp your mind(s) back to that stage, can you remember what you did, and why? I know I should tip to Andy or Nev but presume them to be barely eyeballs above the time demands. Your comments gleefully accepted. Ferg A064 Fuselage and wings out in the back lawn, dodging gulls and dead branches.


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:37:37 PM PST US
    From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <b.nuckolls@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: Save some cable ... maybe
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <b.nuckolls@cox.net> At 11:09 AM 5/9/2005 -0500, you wrote: >--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Jerry Grimmonpre" <jerry@mc.net> > >Electric Bob & listers: >This idea is offered-up as a possible way to save 3-4 feet of AWG-2 used for >the starter/alternator power supply for a Lycoming RV. > >Strap the starter contactor to the side of the starter. > >Connect AWG-2 from the hot side of the battery contactor direct to the input >side of the starter contactor. From the hot side of the starter contactor, >jump over to the alternator B out put with suitable sized AWG. > >Connect a copper strap from the output of starter contactor to the input of >the starter solenoid. Unless your battery is located in the tail, 4AWG is most adequate . . . in fact, a number of builders have used 2AWG only for the long run from battery contactor to starter contactor and 4AWG for all other segments. If your battery is up front, then 4AWG is fine throughout the chrarging/cranking path. The wire is much easier to work with than adding labor to fabricate a suitable hardware for mounting starter contactor on the starter. What you describe will function electrically. If that system is attractive to you, consider using the built-in starter contactor that comes with most modern starters. Use the boost relay circuit shown in Figure Z-22. Then jumper alternator b-lead to the starter contactor hot terminal using a Maxi-Fuse HHX inline holder. See page 13 of of http://www.bussmann.com/shared/library/catalogs/Buss_Auto-Fuse_Cat.pdf Maxi fuses can be found on page 3. Use MAX60 fuse on 40A alternator, MAX80 on a 60A alternator. Eliminate alternator loadmeter feature. The boost relay can mount on firewall. No new hardware bolted to engine. Bob . . .


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:01:49 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Flap root extension
    From: Gerry Holland <gnholland@onetel.com>
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Gerry Holland <gnholland@onetel.com> Wrong list Ferg! Could still get some useful advice I'm sure! Regards Gerry Do not archive


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:31:27 PM PST US
    Subject: Flap root extension
    From: "David Glauser" <david.glauser@xpsystems.com>
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "David Glauser" <david.glauser@xpsystems.com> Uh, Ferg - I think you meant this to go to the Europa list, not 'lectric Bob's, right? dg -----Original Message----- From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Fergus Kyle Subject: AeroElectric-List: Flap root extension --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Fergus Kyle" <VE3LVO@rac.ca> Cheers, This message addresses itself to those who have gone before [really, about everybody] in the construction - specifically the root extension of the flaps to match the fuselage sides: The instructions in my manual actually say to 'fit' the extension foam forms to the root of the flaps. I took this to mean "cut to permit the forms to slide into the root closeout to approximate its original position" as an extension of the foam innards. If this were the case, they would lose about 3/4" of width but would more accurately match the flap itself. it would also mean quite a bit more addition of the forms to reach the fuselage. If you can warp your mind(s) back to that stage, can you remember what you did, and why? I know I should tip to Andy or Nev but presume them to be barely eyeballs above the time demands. Your comments gleefully accepted. Ferg A064 Fuselage and wings out in the back lawn, dodging gulls and dead branches.


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:33:28 PM PST US
    From: "Giffen A Marr" <gamarr@charter.net>
    Subject: Z-28
    --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Giffen A Marr" <gamarr@charter.net> Bob Am I confused or is there a typo in the Z-28 figure on the right hand side. The Aux Bat and Main Bat are both shown connected to the right ignition. Is this right or am I missing something? Giff Marr LIVP/20B 35%


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:55:45 PM PST US
    From: rwtalbot@purephotos.com.au.by.themail.purephotos.com.au.with.HTTP;Tue; (SquirrelMail
    authenticated user rwtalbot);, 10 May 2005 14:54:31+1000@roxy.matronics.com (EST)
    Subject: Re: OV damage to avionics: Dynon, Icom, Collins
    > --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Eric M. Jones" > <emjones@charter.net> > >> Subject: AeroElectric-List message posted by: <gmcjetpilot@yahoo.com> > > > Protecting the radio would cost maybe a buck. You wonder what they were > thinking........! Eric, You mean other than - $ervices revenue, $ervices revenue, $ervices revenue, $ervices revenue, $$$ $$$ ? Richard




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   aeroelectric-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/AeroElectric-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse AeroElectric-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/aeroelectric-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --