Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 08:09 AM - Re: Re: 40amp Denso Aerosport Alternator (Robert L. Nuckolls, III)
2. 10:23 AM - Boost Pump Wiring (John Schroeder)
3. 06:49 PM - KT-76 Solder connector (Bill Judge)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 40amp Denso Aerosport Alternator |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckollsr@cox.net>
At 09:35 PM 6/13/2005 -0700, you wrote:
>--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: <gmcjetpilot@yahoo.com>
>
>
> >Bob N wrote:
> >Okay, it's your considered recommendation that if one
> >purchases p/n (xxxxx) from supplier (YYYYY) then OV
> >protection is not called for. You've cited data to support
> >your advice. Now, how do we get this information into
> >the hands of the greatest numbers of builders?
>
>
>Bob, my advice is from a ranked amateur and offer it with no warrantee.
>You have served to improve the knowledge and best interested of count less
>builders, including myself. I dont think we need to disseminate my opinion
>further than this list.
>
>
> >George, you seem to have completely missed the point
> >I've been trying to illustrate during this endless
> >thread. YOU and many like you are building ONE airplane.
> >You may have conversed with others to gather data
> >on and make selection of specific components in
> >which you have either trust supported by repeatable
> >experiments or faith supported by the gross weight of
> >anecdotal information. In either case, you're certainly
> >free to go forward with your choice and I wish you well.
>
>
>There are no one-size fits all solutions. I have not listed any specific
>part numbers because frankly I dont want the liability. Second I have been
>honest that getting detailed info on a Denso alternator and design in next
>to impossible since all the engineers are in Japan. As far as anecdotal
>evidence, I have tracked down as much info on how transistors fail, why
>and what characteristics different transistors have. It is not a fact but
>a widely held electronics industry expectation that transistor are VERY
>reliable. The external V-regulator and crow bar is no doubt more bullet
>proof. I take your word on it based on your experience and it makes
>sense. I think for most builders they take things on faith and standard
>practice. No need to reinvent the wheel.
>
>
>I think the hey my Denso has worked for 10 years with no problems is just
>that, anecdotal. I agree. As far as tests, sadly are in Japan and in
>Japanese. I hear the Japanese are good with electronics. I am sure Denso
>with 20-30 years making alternators with internal VRs have tested them and
>done failure analysis. Granted a car is not an airplane and I have no proof.
>
>
> >Please understand that I write for thousands of builders
> >working on thousands of airplanes being fabricated all
> >over the world. Their choices for selection of a suitable
> >alternator MIGHT include part number (xxxxx) and maybe
> >they have access to supplier (YYYYY) but I would be
> >remiss in my duties if I were to LIMIT my recommendations
> >to this narrow range of choices . . . especially when
> >I have no data from any repeatable experiments
> >to support my advice. Further, there are MILLIONS of
> >alternators with THOUSANDS of part numbers that will
> >perform very well and free of concerns if we drive
> >probability of hazardous failure down with layered
> >systems architecture . . . this is a major component
> >of FAILURE TOLERANT design. You ASSUME that a part
> >will fail and then incorporate protection -OR-
> >alternate technology (Plan B).
>
>
>Bob, I understand all your recommendations. I understand from your
>analysis, lack of information and judgment you cant endorse it. I think
>your opinions are the most conservative and will provide a method of DC
>power production in an aircraft that provides repeatable reliability and
>a level of safety required in certified aircraft designs. However for me
>in a VFR RV (experimental) with an engine that does not require electrical
>power (mechanical systems and self sustaining ignition), I can get away
>with an alternate path to electric DC power generation. This path is using
>an internal VR alternator with no extra external OV protection. I have OV
>warning (large flashing red light) and a manual way to disconnect the
>alternator output (b-lead) from the system thru a CB. Works for me and me
>only.
>
>
>Others have used the Denso 40 amp, aka Niagara, with good results. Again
>far from rigorous scientific proof, but a collection of general facts,
>anecdotes and opinion. My recommendation is inferior to the method of
>using an external alternator regulator and an OV module, aka crow-bar, in
>a rigorous scientific way. However my design will work OK as intended and
>be safe in my opinion, while being lighter, simpler, and cheaper.
>
>
> >When I handed control lock keys of an explosively
> >launched recovery parachute controller to the pilot who
> >was going to depend on that system to safe his life
> >and perhaps his airplane, I could look him right in
> >the eye and offer that I have done the best I know
> >how to do. When I write words on this List and for
> >the 'Connection, I believe am operating with that
> >same sense of duty to offer the best and most
> >universally useable information available. I am
> >pleased that you have discovered what you believe
> >is the ultimate solution to your system design
> >goals and parts procurement issues. Please fly them in
> >good health. The odds are definitely in your favor.
>
>
>Mr. Nuckolls not to pander to you in anyway, sincerely you have single
>handedly educated thousands of pilot/builders about electrical systems.
>The knowledge of the aviation community in general is the better for your
>contributions. The average aircraft (homebuilt) electrical system has
>improved due to your efforts. I dont mean to undermine your methods,
>analysis or opinions. However I do pick a choose what features I install
>in my electrical system. The most notably is the internal regulated
>alternator. I think you have said this yourself, If it can fail assume it
>will and what will happen when it does. I have analyzed my system and find
>that all alternator failures will be passive and not a threat to safety of
>flight FOR ME. (Dont try this at home, your mileage may vary and this info
>is provided for entertainment purposes only, Sincerely Georges Lawyers,
>Dwey-Cheat'em and Howe)
>
>
> >But understand that I've obligated myself to operate
> >in a wider arena and to offer advice that permits
> >me to look any builder in the eye and offer that
> >it's the best and most universally applicable
> >technology I know how to do right now. I have no
> >FAITH in the universal performance of all the
> >automotive alternators available to the OBAM aircraft
> >community around the world but I do have the
> >knowledge of countless REPEATABLE EXPERIMENTS
> >conducted to craft the most failure tolerant
> >and hazard free systems I know how to do today.
>
>
>Amen, I have no way, other than FAITH, that the Denso alternator will not
>hurt me or the airframe, and the level of risk, is appropriate and I am
>willing to accept it and understand it. I have determined that my old
>Collins transponder and new Icom A200 (without OV protected power supply)
>may likely be damaged. Other equipment is OV protected internally and if
>damaged the manufacture assured me the damage would be repairable at
>nominal cost. Plan A never have an electrical failure. My maintenance plan
>to assure reliability is checking electrical volts and amps carefully for
>any sign/trend of impending failure, replace battery on regular basis and
>never over load alternator. During flight test I will thermocouple
>alternator to determine operating temps are acceptable. Blast cooling tube
>will be installed.
>
>
> > I'm not here to argue against the gospel of
> >Nipon Denso or any other. I have tools called
> >Failure Mode Effects Analysis, decades of experience
> >with others who design, build and fly airplanes
> >and a personal goal of understanding how things
> >work and sharing that with anyone who has an
> >interest. I cannot advise a builder to adopt a
> >design philosophy that I do not understand or that
> >he cannot understand AND CONTROL.
>
>
>Bob, no one mounting the sermon; You are right you dont have ABSOLUTE
>control and dont have complete understanding how the IC chip and
>transistor works in a Denso. I have gone as far as I needed to see the
>truth, GOOD ENOUGH for me, no more or less. I really think alternators
>with internal regulators are getting better and soon will have failsafe
>internal regulators. The auto industry will demand it and we will benefit
>from it.
>
>
>Other alternators like Mitsubishi have also worked well, and from my
>research others like Delco/Motorola/Hitachi have had poor service history
>according to the Highway Safety foundation. The Denso has just happened to
>become the De-facto choice for homebuilders, proven to be reliable in
>cars, industrial equip and planes, size, weight and the dual internal fans.
>
>
>I looked at the problem of over voltage, load dump, transient voltage and
>equipment protection and found that it is acceptable that my system suffer
>an OV condition, so reliably is moot. However I prey that it will be as
>reliable as I think it will be and as others have experienced. The chance
>of fire or catastrophic failure of the alternator is nill. I do run the
>risk of some equipment damage if a rare OV occurred, but that may be
>limited to a few hundred dollars of damage. That is where I am putting my
>faith, but this is a special system design and meets my fault tolerance
>analysis.
>
>
>If it can fail it will and any failure should not cause a hazard. Amen, we
>shall now turn our Aeroelectric Hymnal to page XX.
>
>
> >Bob . . .
>
>
>All the best and I thank you again for forcing us to critically think thru
>out systems. Even if it is not the perfect solution for ALL at least it is
>MY system and I have knowledge of the risk and benefits. I am searching
>for the lightest and most reliable electrical system I can get, and I
>accept the risk of an OV as unlikely but an acceptable one. Bob I have
>learned a lot from your books and forum.
Carefully considered and well put sir . . . with one minor
exception. I hope I'm not "forcing" anyone to do anything,
even if it's to exercise the benefits of critical thinking.
I appreciate your participation here on the List. The quality
of our critical thinking can only grow when we have multiple
gray matter masses considering the questions!
Bob . . .
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Boost Pump Wiring |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "John Schroeder" <jschroeder@perigee.net>
Hello Bob -
Attached is a wire sheet showing the wiring for a Dukes Fuel pump that we
installed in our Lancair ES. For some reason, Dukes keeps voltage on the
lead that is not in use - as designated by the switch position. We
discovered this when we turned the pump on for a quick check and both
annunciator lights lit up.
We tested a solution of inserting diodes in line on each power lead to the
pump. This works great. We used the 1n5400 diodes, but I wonder if the 3
amp capacity is sufficient. Dukes recommends a 7.5 amp fuse for the device.
Any comments on:
(1) The wiring itself?
(2) The size of the diodes?
Many thanks,
John Schroeder
--
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | KT-76 Solder connector |
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Bill Judge <bjudge@gmail.com>
Hello All:
I'm installing a KT-76 in my RV-8 and would like to be able to easily
disconnect the transponder from the co-ax but it has a solder
termination rather than a BNC. Does anyone know if there is BNC
version of this connector?
If not then I'll put a connector down the line a few inches but that
would be adding more places for failure...
Thanks in advance.
Bill Judge
N84WJ
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|